alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Pascual A. Soto, Also Known as Pasquale Soto, Appellant.

Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Arlene R. Silver-man, J.), rendered May 16, 1989, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the second degree and sentencing him to an indeterminate term of imprisonment of from three years to life, unanimously reversed, on the law, and the matter remanded for a new trial.

Defendant, the sole occupant of a car from which the police recovered more than two ounces of cocaine, testified that other persons also had access to the vehicle, thereby suggesting that they could have placed the narcotics there. Over defendant’s objection, the People were permitted to call an expert rebuttal witness to testify to the street value of the narcotics. The *voir dire*was conducted in front of the jury, also over defendant’s objection. While limited evidence as to the monetary value of the cocaine was admissible, the breadth of the examination of the expert rebuttal witness was prejudicial to defendant and requires reversal.

Particularly prejudicial was the expert’s testimony regarding the various methods by which the narcotics could be distributed and their value increased and the relationship between the Narcotics Division, to which the witness was assigned, and the Federal Drug Enforcement Administration and other narcotics agencies. Such evidence shifted the focus from the central issues in the case to the drug trade in general. *(See, People v Negron,*136 AD2d 523, 526; *People v Maldonado,*50 AD2d 556.) In this connection, we note that defendant was not charged with possessing the drugs with intent to sell.

We find no error in the court’s charge, as claimed. In view of our determination, we find it unnecessary to reach defendant’s remaining contention, especially since the circumstances upon which it is based are unlikely to recur. Concur— Murphy, P. J., Sullivan, Carro, Wallach and Kupferman, JJ.
#### In the Matter of 258 Riverside Drive Co., Appellant, v New York State Division of Housing and Community Renewal et al., Respondents.

Order and judgment (one paper), Supreme Court, New York County (Michael Dontzin, J.), entered June 19, 1990, which denied petitioner’s application pursuant to CPLR article 78 challenging orders of the New York State Division of Housing and Community Renewal, and dismissed the proceeding, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

A rent reduction was imposed on apartments in petitioner’s residential building for service reductions, including an inoperative elevator, unclean public areas, soft spots on the roof of the building, lack of heat and hot water, an inoperative intercom system, and loose tiles on the first four floors of the building. The factual issues raised by petitioner were for the administrative agency to determine, and the record shows that the determinations challenged herein have a rational basis, and were not arbitrary or capricious *(see, e.g., Matter of 230 E. 52nd St. Assocs. v State Div. of Hous. & Community Renewal,*131 AD2d 349). The Agency was not required to give the petitioner notice of an inspection *(Matter of Albert v Eimicke,*151 AD2d 746). Concur—Sullivan, J. P., Rosenberger, Kupferman, Ross and Smith, JJ.
# C o u rt o f

A p p ea ls

o f t h e S t a te o f

G eo rg ia

ATLANTA,_

_ _ __ _ _ __ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ __ _

Th e Co u rt

o f Ap p ea l s h er eb y p a s s es t h e f

o ll owi n g o r der :

A1 8 A0 63 6 . CALVI N SMI TH v . THE STATE.

In t h i s cri m i n al act i o n , t h e t ri al co u rt en t ered a n o r d er o n Au g us t 11

, 2 0 1 7,

d en y i n g sev eral p ret ri al m o t i on s fi l ed b y d efen d an t Cal v i n Sm i t h

, in cl ud i ng m o t i on s

i n wh i ch Sm i t h rai s ed d o u b le jeo p ard y an d s tat u t o ry s p eed y t ri al cl ai m s. On Au g u s t

2 1

, 2 0 1 7

, Sm i t h fi l ed a n ot i ce o f ap p eal

, s eek i n g rev iew o f t he Au gu s t 1 1 o rd er. T h at

ap p eal h as b een d o ck et ed i n t h is Co u rt as Cas e No . A1 8 A0 4 6 4.

On Sep t em

ber 1 3, 2 0 1 7, Sm i t h fi l ed a s eco n d no t i ce o f ap peal

, ag ai n s eek i n g

rev i ew o f t h e Au g u st 1 1 o rd er. Th at a p p e a l h as b een d o ck et ed i n t h i s Co u rt as t h e

i n s t an t cas e, No . A1 8 A0 6 3 6

.

A n o t i ce o f ap p eal m

u s t b e fi l ed w i t hi n 3 0 d ay s o f en t ry of t h e o rd er s o u g h t to

b e ap p eal ed

. OCGA § 5 -6 -3 8 (a). Th e p ro p er an d ti m el y fi l in g o f a n o t i ce o f ap p eal

i s an ab s o l u t e req u i rem en t t o co n fer j u ri sd i ct i o n o n t h i s Co u rt

. Ro wl a n d v. S t a t e , 2 6 4

Ga. 87 2

, 8 7 2 (1 ) (4 5 2 SE2 d 7 5 6 ) (1 9 9 5 ). Sm i t h ’ s n ot i ce of a p p e a l i n Cas e

No

. A1 8 A0 6 3 6 i s u n t i m el y , as i t was fi l e d 3 3 d ay s aft er en t ry o f t h e t ri al co urt ’ s

o rd er. Th e ap p eal i n Cas e N o

. A1 8A0 6 3 6 al so i s d u p l i cat iv e o f th e cu rren tl y p en d i n g

ap p eal i n Cas e No

. A1 8 A 0 4 6 4

. Co ns eq u en t l y , Cas e No

. A1 8 A0 6 3 6 i s h ereb y November 27, 2017DISM ISSED as u n t i m el y an d s u p erfl u o u s

. T he p art ies are DIRECTED t o s u b m i t al l

fu t u re fi l i n g s i n t h i s ap p eal u n d er Cas e No . A1 8 A 0 4 6 4

.

C o u r t o f A p p e a l s o f t h e S t a t e o

f G e o r g ia

C le r k ’ s O f f i c e

, A t la n t a

,

_

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ I c e r ti fy t h a t t h e a b o v e is a t r u e e x t r a c t f r o m

t h e m i n u t e s o

f t h e C o u r t o

f A p p e a l s o f G e o r g i a

. W i tn e s s m y s i g n a t u r e a n d th e s e a l o

f s a i d c o u r t

h e r e t o a f f i x e d t h e d a y a n d y e a r l a s t a b o v e w r i t t e n

.

, C l e r k

. 11/27/2017
----

List of bodies designated by the Member States to supply and award contracts for fresh fruit and vegetables withdrawn from the market for use as animal feed, for distillation, and for non-food uses

(2005/C 92/03)

This list is published in accordance with Article 18(3) of Regulation (EC) No 103/2004 (OJ L 16, 23.1.2004, p. 3).

----
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-1164

In Re: KEVIN WAYNE MCDANIELS,

Petitioner.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. 

(1:14-cv-03728-TLW; 1:14-cv-04197-TLW)

Submitted: June 25, 2015 Decided: June 29, 2015

Before GREGORY, FLOYD, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Kevin Wayne McDaniels, Petitioner Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Kevin Wayne McDaniels petitions for a writ of mandamus seeking 

an order directing the recusal of certain district court judges, 

reopening of his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012), proceedings or his trial, 

and the refund of filing fees he has paid. We conclude that

McDaniels is not entitled to mandamus relief.

Mandamus relief is a drastic remedy and should be used only 

in extraordinary circumstances. Kerr v. U.S. Dist. Court, 426 

U.S. 394, 402 (1976); United States v. Moussaoui, 333 F.3d 509, 

516-17 (4th Cir. 2003). Further, mandamus relief is available 

only when the petitioner has a clear right to the relief sought. 

In re First Fed. Sav. & Loan Ass’n, 860 F.2d 135, 138 (4th Cir. 

1988). The relief sought by McDaniels is not available by way of 

mandamus. Accordingly, we deny the petition and amended petitions 

for writ of mandamus as well as McDaniels’ motion for return of 

filing fees. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and 

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before 

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLAImages

# DLA Images

Search

Search

                                  - All Images 
                                  - Other 

                                  - Upload Date
                                  - Photo Date
                                  - Title

Share

----

Download Image: Small ()Medium ()Full Size (0.9 MB)

Tags:DSCC, DLA Land & Maritime, Navy Rear Adm. John King, DLA Land and Maritime Commander, columbus, Events, People and Culture

Photo by:VIRIN: 

Photo Gallery
----

----

I Informācija

Komisija

----

Euro maiņas kurss (1)

2005. gada 8. aprīlis

(2005/C 87/01)

1 euro= 

----

(1)

Datu avots: atsauces maiņas kursu publicējusi ECB.

----

III Paziņojumi

Komisija

----

Grozījums paziņojumā par konkursu attiecībā uz ievedmuitas nodokļa samazinājumu par kukurūzu, ko ieved no trešajām valstīm

(“Eiropas Savienības Oficiālais Vēstnesis” C 325, 2004. gada 31. decembris)

(2005/C 87/02)

I sadaļā “Temats” 8. lpp. 2. punktu aizstāj ar šādu tekstu:

----

Labojums

----

Labojums Komisijas paziņojumam atbilstīgi Padomes Regulas (EEK) Nr. 2408/92 4. panta 1. punkta a) apakšpunktam – Īrijas veiktā sabiedrisko pakalpojumu sniegšanas saistību pārskatīšana attiecībā uz regulāro gaisa satiksmi starp Gelveju (Galway) un Dublinu

(“Eiropas Savienības Oficiālais Vēstnesis” C 39, 2005. gada 16. februāris)

(2005/C 87/03)

4. lappusē, 2.4. punkta a) apakšpunkta i) punktā:

tekstu:

“augstākais 80 % sēdvietu dienā... sākot no 75 euro vienā virzienā”

lasīt kā:

“vismaz 80 % sēdvietu dienā ... maksimums 75 euro vienā virzienā”.

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM SEEC, INC.
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE YEAR ENDED MARCH 31, 2000 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                      18,404,429
<SECURITIES>                                 7,797,247
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,118,740
<ALLOWANCES>                                 (100,000)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            27,703,902
<PP&E>                                       1,824,315
<DEPRECIATION>                               (689,016)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              31,945,623
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,348,705
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        63,092
<OTHER-SE>                                  29,533,826
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                31,945,623
<SALES>                                      2,566,262
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             6,315,805
<CGS>                                          142,217
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,219,186
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            10,675,907
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                59,299
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (5,123,831)
<INCOME-TAX>                                 (395,000)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (4,728,831)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (4,728,831)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.79)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.79)


</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3915 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 3915

  To prevent States from taxing Federal military retirement annuities 
  while not taxing State retirement annuities on the basis of whether 
          there are employee contributions for such annuities.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 24, 1994

Mr. Torkildsen (for himself, Mr. Blute, and Mr. Studds) introduced the 
  following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To prevent States from taxing Federal military retirement annuities 
  while not taxing State retirement annuities on the basis of whether 
          there are employee contributions for such annuities.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. LIMITATION ON FEDERAL CONSENT TO TAX MILITARY RETIREMENT 
              ANNUITIES.

    (a) In General.--Section 111 of title 4, United States Code, is 
amended by inserting before the period ``or, in the case of retired or 
retainer pay payable by reason of service in the uniformed services (as 
defined in section 101 of title 10), whether there are employee 
contributions toward such pay''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) shall 
apply to taxable years beginning after January 1, 1994.

                                 <all>
```
II 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 518 

To authorize the issuance of H2O nonimmigrant visas for aliens temporarily 

performing labor in the seafood processing industry. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 11, 2013 

Mr. BEGICH introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To authorize the issuance of H2O nonimmigrant visas for 

aliens temporarily performing labor in the seafood processing industry. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘H2O Visa for Seafood 

5 Processing Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. AVAILABILITY OF H2O NONIMMIGRANT VISAS FOR 

7 SEAFOOD PROCESSING INDUSTRY. 

8 (a) TECHNICAL AMENDMENTS; AVAILABILITY OF

9 H2O NONIMMIGRANT VISAS FOR ALIENS WORKING IN

10 SEAFOOD PROCESSING INDUSTRY.—Section 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 518 IS

1 101(a)(15)(H) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 

2 U.S.C. 1101(a)(15)(H)) is amended— 

3 (1) in clause (i)— 

4 (A) by striking ‘‘an alien (i) (b) subject’’ 

5 and inserting the following ‘‘an alien— 

6 ‘‘(i)(b) subject’’; 

7 (B) in subclause (b), by striking ‘‘section 

8 212(n)(1), or’’ and inserting ‘‘section 

9 212(n)(1);’’; 

10 (C) in subclause (b1), by striking ‘‘section 

11 212(t)(1), or’’ and inserting ‘‘section 

12 212(t)(1);’’; and 

13 (D) in subclause (c), by striking ‘‘or’’ at 

14 the end; and 

15 (2) in clause (ii)— 

16 (A) in subclause (a), by striking ‘‘nature, 

17 or’’ and inserting ‘‘nature;’’; 

18 (B) in subclause (b), by striking ‘‘or’’ at 

19 the end; and 

20 (C) by adding at the end the following: 

21 ‘‘(o) having a residence in a foreign 

22 country, which the alien has no intention 

23 of abandoning, who is coming temporarily 

24 to the United States to perform labor in 

25 the seafood processing industry; or’’. 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 518 IS

1 (b) STATE CONSULTATION REQUIREMENT.—Section 

2 212(a)(5)(A) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 

3 U.S.C. 1182(a)(5)(A)) is amended— 

4 (1) in clause (i), by striking ‘‘Attorney General’’ 

5 and inserting ‘‘Secretary of Homeland Security’’; 

6 and 

7 (2) by adding at the end the following: 

8 ‘‘(v) SEAFOOD PROCESSING.—The 

9 Secretary of Labor may not make a certifi10 cation under clause (i) with respect to the 

11 seafood processing industry without first 

12 consulting with the governor and the labor 

13 commissioner of the State in which the 

14 alien is to perform such labor.’’. 

Æ 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
# Il-Ġurnal Uffiċjali C NaN/12 t

| | ISSN 1725-5015 |
| --- | --- |
| Il-Ġurnal Uffiċjali
  ta’ l-Unjoni Ewropea | C NaN |
| | |
| Edizzjoni bil-Malti | Informazzjoni u Avviżi | Volum 4812 ta' April 2005 |

ISSN 1725-5015

Il-Ġurnal Uffiċjali

ta’ l-Unjoni Ewropea

C NaN

Edizzjoni bil-Malti

Informazzjoni u Avviżi

Volum 4812 ta' April 2005

---

| Avviż Nru | Werrej | Paġna |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | III   Avviżi |
| | Il-Kunsill |
| 2005/C /1 | Avviż ta' post temporanju battal — Ref. B/018 — Assistent soċjali | 1 |

Avviż Nru

Werrej

Paġna

III   Avviżi

Il-Kunsill

2005/C /1

Avviż ta' post temporanju battal — Ref. B/018 — Assistent soċjali

1

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Din il-Ħarġa Speċjali bil-Malti hija ppubblikata bil-lingwi uffiċjali ta' l-istituzzjonijiet ta' l-Unjoni Ewropea fil-ĠU C 88 A. |

---

(1)   Din il-Ħarġa Speċjali bil-Malti hija ppubblikata bil-lingwi uffiċjali ta' l-istituzzjonijiet ta' l-Unjoni Ewropea fil-ĠU C 88 A.

1

| MT | |
| --- | --- |

MT

---

III Avviżi

Il-Kunsill

| 12.4.2005 | MT | Il-Ġurnal Uffiċjali ta’ l-Unjoni Ewropea | C NaN/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.4.2005

MT

Il-Ġurnal Uffiċjali ta’ l-Unjoni Ewropea

C NaN/1

---

AVVIŻ TA' POST TEMPORANJU BATTAL

Ref. B/018

ASSISTENT SOĊJALI

(2005/C 88 A/01)

Is-Segretarjat Ġenerali tal-Kunsill ta' l-Unjoni Ewropea qed ifittex li jimla' impjieg temporanju battal għal xogħol li jaqa' taħt il-kategorija B*, grad 5 fid-Direttorat A 1B, Persunal u Amministrazzjoni, fi Brussell.

Is-Servizz Soċjali tas-Segretarjat Ġenerali tal-Kunsill ta' l-Unjoni Ewropea jipprovdi għajnuna u sostenn f'sitwazzjonijiet diffiċli lill-uffiċjali u lill-familji tagħhom, kif ukoll lill-uffiċjali li rtiraw. Id-dmirijet ewlenin tiegħu/tagħha jinkludu l-faċilitazzjoni ta' l-integrazzjoni ta' uffiċjali ġodda u l-familji tagħhom kif ukoll ir-rikonċiljazzjoni tal-ħajja privata u dik professjonali u l-istabbiliment ta' rabtiet mill-qrib ma' kollegi li rtiraw.

Aktar informazzjoni u formoli ta' applikazzjoni jistgħu jinkisbu billi tikkuntattja lid-Dipartiment għas-Selezzjoni u r-Reklutaġġ f'dan l-indirizz:

service.recrutement@consilium.eu.int

jew fil-websajt:

http://ue.eu.int/concours.

Terminu perentorju: 10/05/2005, it-timbru tal-posta jservi bħala prova.

---
Exhibit 32.2



Certification of Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)



In connection with the
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2013 (the “Report”) of GSV Capital Corp. (the “Registrant”),
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Stephen D. Bard, the Chief Financial Officer of the
Registrant, hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge, that:



(1) The Report fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and



(2) The information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.



| |       |  | /s/ Stephen D. Bard
| | ----- |  | -------------------
| | Name: |  | Stephen D. Bard    
| | Date: |  | May 9, 2013
##### 



Exhibit 13.1 CORPORACIÓN DURANGO, S.A. DE C.V.
SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER I, Miguel Rincón, Chief Executive Officer of Corporación Durango, S.A. de
C.V. (the Company), hereby certify pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that: 1. The Companys annual report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31,
2003, as amended by the Form 20-F/A to which this statement is filed as an
exhibit (the Report), fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. Date: July 22, 2004 /s/ Miguel RincónBy: Miguel RincónTitle: Chief Executive Officer
#### King Lemon et al., Respondents, v Nivram Realty Corp., Appellant.

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Anita Florio, J.), entered on November 13, 1989, upon a jury verdict in favor of plaintiff King Lemon in the sum of $510,375.75, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

Reviewing the jury’s verdict in the light most favorable to the prevailing party, we conclude that the jury’s findings of negligence on the part of the defendant-landlord are sufficiently supported by the evidence, and that the award of damages does not deviate materially from what would be reasonable compensation (CPLR 5501 [c]; *see, Christopher v Great Atl. & Pac. Tea Co.,*76 NY2d 1003). There was sufficient evidence that the plaintiff sustained injury to his head and neck when a portion of the bathroom ceiling collapsed while he was shaving.

*289The jury was in the best position to resolve the conflicting medical testimony as to the extent of his injuries, and we find no basis to interfere with their conclusions *(Furia v Mellucci,*163 AD2d 88). Contrary to defendant’s claim, no reasonable view of the evidence justifies a comparative negligence charge arising from plaintiffs failure to repair the ceiling or to shave elsewhere in the apartment.

We have considered defendant’s other claims and find them to be without merit. Concur—Sullivan, J. P., Wallach, Asch and Smith, JJ.