alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Crop Amount

Commodities 2,419

NPMA food processing structures 200

Mills and processors 74,510

Dried Cured Pork 3,730

Total Post Harvest 80,859

Cucurbits 59,500

Eggplant - field 6,904

Forest nursery 34,230

Nursery stock - fruit, nut, flower 1,591

Orchard replant 18,324

Ornamentals 48,164

Peppers - field 28,366

Strawberry - field 678,004

Strawberry runners 3,752

Tomatoes - field 54,423

Sweet potato slips 8,709

Total Pre-Plant 941,967

Total Use Limit 1,022,826

as % of baseline 4.0%

CRITICAL USES in DECISION XXII/6 (kg)
Pre-plant total use (as percent of total use) 92.1%

Total pre-plant 

CUA Allowances 699,683

Post-harvest total use (as percent of total use) 7.9%

Total postharvest 

CUA Allowances 60,061

Sum of above percentages 100.0% Total CUAs 759,744

As % of baseline 3.0%

CUA Allocation Calculations

PRE-PLANT vs. POST-HARVEST CUA ALLOCATIONS (kg)
Company

Relative 

Share

Pre-Plant 

Allocation

Post Harvest 

Allocation

Chemtura Corp. 0.6077 425,197 36,499

Albermarle 0.2499 174,851 15,009

ICL-IP (Ameribrom) 0.1381 96,626 8,294

Trical 0.0043 3,009 258

Subtotal 1.0000 699,683 60,061

Total (kg) 759,744

Company Specific CUA Allowances

Proposed CUE Allowance Allocation
Albemarle ICL-IP America

Bill Clark Pest Control, Inc. Industrial Fumigant Co.

Burnside Services, Inc. Pacific Ag

Cardinal Professional Products Pest Fog Sales Corp.

Chemtura Corp. Prosource One

Crop Production Services Reddick Fumigants

Degesch America, Inc. Trical, Inc.

Helena Chemical Co. Trident Agricultural Products

Hendrix and Dail Univar

Hy-Yield Products, LLC Western Fumigation

Total (kilograms) 263,082

CRITICAL STOCK ALLOCATIONS

Note: Specific company stocks data are CBI material. EPA has company 

specific data in the classified portion of the docket.
# United States Court **of Appeals**  **f or the Fifth Circuit** 

No. 19

- 40930 Summary Calendar

**United States of America,**
Plaintiff

— Appellee **,**

versus
**Keelon Jmar Senegal,**
Defendant

— Appellant

**.**

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 3:16

- CV

- 163

Before **King, Higginson,**  and **Willett,** Circuit Judges

**. Per Curiam**  **:** * Keelon Jmar Senegal, federal prisoner # 45142

- 079, appeals the denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion in which he challenged his Armed Career Criminal Act (ACCA) sentence in light of Johnson v. United States , 576 U.S. 591 (2015). He argues that he has demonstrated that it is more likely than not

* Pursuant to **5th Cir cuit**  **R ule**  47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in **5th Cir cuit**  **R ule**  47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED September 30, 2022 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 19-40930 Document: 00516491725 Page: 1 Date Filed: 09/30/2022No. 19

- 40930

2 that the district court relied on the residual clause at sentencing and that the reliance on the residual clause was not harmless. We do not address the Government’ s argument , raised for the first time here, that Senegal procedurally defaulted his Johnson claim. In light of t he legal landscape at the time of Senegal’s sentencing , see, e.g. , United States v. Davis , 487 F.3d 282, 287 (5th Cir. 2007) , Senegal has

met his burden of showing that it is more likely than not that the sentencing court relied on the residual clause at sentencing. See United States v. Clay , 921 F.3d 550, 559 (5th Cir. 2019)

. However, as we recently held, a Texas robbery

- by

- threat conviction satisfies the ACCA’s elements clause. See United States v. Garrett , 24 F.4th 485, 489 (5th Cir. 2022)

. Thus , any reliance on the residual clause at sentencing was harmless. See United States v. Griffin , 946 F.3d 759, 761

- 62 (5th Cir. 2020). Senegal’s a rgument that Garrett was wrongly decided is unavailing. See United States v. Montgomery , 974 F.3d 587, 590 n.4 (5th Cir. 2020) , cert. denied , 141 S. Ct. 2823 (2021)

. **AFFIRMED**

. Case: 19-40930 Document: 00516491725 Page: 2 Date Filed: 09/30/2022
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Commerce

###### Foreign-Trade Zones Board

          - [B-28-2018]

On April 30, 2018, Takasago International Corp. (U.S.A.) submitted a notification of proposed production activity to the FTZ Board for its facility within FTZ 37—Site 10, in Harriman, New York.

                    The notification was processed in accordance with the regulations of the FTZ Board (15 CFR part 400), including notice in the                     **Federal Register**                     inviting public comment (83 FR 20033, May 7, 2018). On August 28, 2018, the applicant was notified of the FTZ Board's decision that no further review of the activity is warranted at this time. The production activity described in the notification was authorized, subject to the FTZ Act and the FTZ Board's regulations, including Section 400.14.                

Dated: August 28, 2018.

Andrew McGilvray,

Executive Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2018-19209 Filed 9-4-18; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
# ©©~~ 

# _., .**-~** 

# · · RECEIVED**B~~~~:~f~~RAL** AVIATION

# ~MINISTRATION r;"'· /. 

### l 

## 2012 ·,,·., ..; ...:.;:('DEl''

### rf#Jlt~norableJ.E. Sullivan 

# H
. .

.. ):\\:!
.

## ..~...

## ::{f\,k)N~) 

# EARING DOCKET
In the Matter Of: 

### lU

## lZ JUL •· 3 ,L\ 

## q: L! 

## 8

# ~ BRENDANAIRWAYS, LLC d/b/a USA 3000 Respondent 

### ) ) ) ) 

### ) Docket No. FAA-2012-0020
Case No. 2011 EA 170024

NOTICE OF ALTERNATE PHONE NUMBER On April23, 2012, inthe Order SettingR1.lle 1.6 Litigation Scheduling Conference;'-aiid.DirecHng Rule 26(f) Planning and Submission (Order), the Court scheduled a Rule 16 Conference to occ'ur Wednesday, June 27,2012 at 11:00 am Eastern time. The Orderprovided that the Office ofHearings is to initiate the Conference by telephone call to each party's telephone number ofrecord. The Order also statedthat a party may provide an alternate telepohone number bynotifYing the Office ofHearings at least 24 hours prior to the Conference. 

### See Order at 1. On June 21, 2012 Respondent's Counsel contacted the Office ofHearings to provide notice ofan alternate telephone number for attorney Jason Dickstein: (202) 365-2422. This Notice serves to reaffirm the alternative number to The Honorable J.E. Sullivan at the Office ofHearings and notifY Complainant's Counsel Zachary M. Berman ofthe alternate phone number.

RESPONDENT USA 3000 NOTICE OF ALTERNATE PHONE NUMBER Associate Washington Aviation Group, PC and the

Law Offices ofJason A. Dickstein 2233 Wisconsin Avenue, NW, Suite 503 Washington, DC 20007· Tel: (202) 628-8947

### CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

### RE: Brendan Airways, LLC, Respondent, DocketNumber: FAA-2012-0020, Case Number: 2011EA170024. The undersigned hereby certifies that he caused the attached -Notice ofAlternate Phone Number 

### to be filed/served onthe persons at the addresses listed below by first class mail, certified, return receipt requested, and by a courtesy copy via facsimile transmission, on the date indicated below. ORIGINAL AND ONE COPY 

### Federal Aviation Administration 800 Independence Avenue, SW Washington, DC 20591 Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430, Wilbur Wright Building

- Suite 2Wl000
ONE COPY 

### Zachary M. Berman, 

### Complainant's Counsel Office ofthe Regional Counsel, AS0-7 Eastern Region Federal Aviation Administration I 

### Aviation Plaza Jamaica, NY 11434 FAX: 718.995.5699 The Honorable J. E. Sullivan, Administrative Law Judge Office ofHearings, M-20 US Dept. ofTransportation 1200 New Jersey Avenue, 

## SE Washington, DC 

### 20590 FAX: 202.366.7536

RESPONDENT BRENDAN AIRWAYS, LLC CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

### June 21, 2012 Date Washington Aviation Group, PC and the Law Offices ofJason A. Dickstein 2233 WisconsinAvenue, NW, Suite 503 Washington, DC 20007 ·Tel: 202-628-6776
EXHIBIT 13.2

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT

TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Embotelladora Andina S.A. (the Company) on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended December 31,
2006, as filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Osvaldo Garay, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                         
|-------------------------
|                         
|/s/ OSVALDO GARAY        
|Osvaldo Garay            
|Chief Financial Officer  
|Embotelladora Andina S.A.
|Dated: June 29, 2007     

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will
be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### Marc Kernes, Respondent, v Pine Plains Central School et al., Appellants.

Mahoney, P. J.

Appeal (transferred to this court by order of the Appellate Division, Second Department) from an order of the Supreme Court (Juiduce, J.), entered February 23, 1990 in Dutchess County, which denied defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

On January 25, 1986, plaintiff and defendant Rodney Bath-rick were involved in an automobile accident near the Taconic State Parkway in the Town of La Grange, Dutchess County. Plaintiff subsequently commenced this action against Bathrick and defendant Pine Plains Central School as owner of the Bathrick vehicle. Plaintiff alleged that defendants’ negligence resulted in damage to his back constituting serious injury as defined by Insurance Law § 5102 (d). Defendants subsequently learned through discovery that plaintiff had been injured in a previous automobile accident occurring in July 1984, which also resulted in injury to plaintiff’s back. Plaintiff had commenced a lawsuit to recover for the back injuries sustained in the 1984 accident and had previously settled that case for $35,000 in January 1987. Defendants herein moved for summary judgment on the grounds, *inter alia,*that plaintiff did not suffer a serious injury from the 1986 accident because the injuries he allegedly sustained therefrom were essentially the same as those caused by the 1984 accident and that plaintiff has been fully compensated therefor. In opposition, plaintiff submitted, *inter alia,*the affidavit of a doctor stating that plaintiff’s injuries from the 1986 accident were different from those sustained in the 1984 accident. Supreme Court denied the motion and this appeal followed.

We affirm. As this court has often stated, summary judgment is extreme and therefore appropriate only where there is no doubt as to the lack of triable issues of fact *(see, e.g., Passonno v Hall,*125 AD2d 767). Here, the affidavit of Dr. Nathaniel Shafer is sufficient to create triable issues of fact and defeat defendants’ motion for summary judgment. Shafer stated that the injuries to plaintiff’s back resulting from the 1986 accident "are substantially different, severe, and more *982disabling than those relating to his 1984 accident”. Shafer diagnosed those injuries as a "disabling condition” of chronic sciatic syndrome which has rendered plaintiff "disabled from employment” since the 1986 accident. This opinion is sufficiently based on the examination and treatment of plaintiff after the 1986 accident to create triable issues of fact as to the degree of injury sustained by plaintiff therein as opposed to those injuries sustained in his earlier accident *(see, Lopez v Senatore,*65 NY2d 1017; *Whiteford v Smith,*168 AD2d 885; *Petrone v Thornton,*166 AD2d 513).

Order affirmed, without costs. Mahoney, P. J., Casey, Levine, Mercure and Harvey, JJ., concur.
#### In the Matter of Jennifer D. and Others, Infants.

.Order insofar as appealed from unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Respondents appeal from an order that terminated their parental rights with respect to three of their children and denied their motion to stay entry of judgment terminating their parental rights. The order also denied their request for permission "to prepare a petition seeking extension of the suspended judgment.” In a prior order, the court had ordered that in one year judgment would be entered terminating respondents’ parental rights unless, before the end of one year, any interested party petitioned the court for return of one or more of the children "or for extension of the Order of suspended judgment.” The prior order further provided that a petition seeking an extension would be granted only if the Erie County Department of Social Services and Child and Family Services "can assure the Court that substantial progress” has been made by respondents toward goals set forth in the order. Respondents’ motion seeking permission "to prepare a petition” was made 27 days after the expiration of one year.

Although respondents are correct that the court failed to state the facts it deemed essential to its decision (CPLR 4213 [b]), that failure does not require remittitur because the record is sufficient for this court to make its own findings *(see, Matter of Jose L.I.,*46 NY2d 1024; *Matter of Apker v Malchak,*112 AD2d 518). We find that, even if respondents had made a timely petition to extend judgment, the court would have been correct in denying that petition based on respondents’ failure to meet the condition in the order suspending judgment. *1024Rather than "assuring” the court that progress had been made, the Department of Social Services and Child and Family Services emphatically recommended termination of parental rights in response to respondents’ motion. (Appeal from Order of Erie County Family Court, Sedita, J.—Terminate Parental Rights.) Present—Dillon, P. J., Callahan, Denman, Green and Pine, JJ.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Daniel J. Jackson, Appellant.

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Counsel’s application to withdraw granted *(see, People v Crawford,*71 AD2d 38). (Appeal from Judgment of Genesee County Court, Morton, J.—Felony Driving While Intoxicated.) Present—Callahan, J. P., Denman, Balio, Lawton and Lowery, JJ.
#### The State of Ohio, Appellee, *v.*Rector, Appellant.

(No. 30567

Decided January 23, 1946.)

*Mr. Frank T. Cullitan,*prosecuting attorney, *Mr. Norman S. Minor*and *Miss Gertrude M. Bauer,*for appellee.

*Mr. Louis Fernberg*and *Mr. Myron S. Stanford,*for appellant.

It is ordered and adjudged that this appeal as of right be, and the same hereby is, dismissed for the reason that no debatable constitutional question is involved.-

*Appeal dismissed.*

Weygandt, C. J., Zimmerman, Bell, Williams, Turner, Matthias and Hart, JJ., concur.
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned hereby certifies that the
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2011 of Conex MD,
Inc. (the "Company") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information
contained in such report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: May 13, 2011


/s/ Dr. Ely Steinberg
-----------------------------------------
Dr. Ely Steinberg, President and Director
(Principal Executive Officer)
**EXHIBIT 13.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT**

**TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906**

**OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Annual Report of  Embotelladora Andina S.A. (the “Company”) on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2014, as filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Andrés Wainer, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)                 The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)                 The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| /s/ ANDRÉS WAINER     |   |
|----------------------------|--------|
| Andrés Wainer         |   |
| Chief Financial Officer    |   |
| Embotelladora Andina S.A.  |   |
| Dated: April 30, 2015 |   |

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

----
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 569 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 569

 To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to count a period of 
    receipt of outpatient observation services in a hospital toward 
  satisfying the 3-day inpatient hospital requirement for coverage of 
           skilled nursing facility services under Medicare.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 14, 2013

   Mr. Brown introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to count a period of 
    receipt of outpatient observation services in a hospital toward 
  satisfying the 3-day inpatient hospital requirement for coverage of 
           skilled nursing facility services under Medicare.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Improving Access to Medicare 
Coverage Act of 2013''.

SEC. 2. COUNTING A PERIOD OF RECEIPT OF OUTPATIENT OBSERVATION SERVICES 
              IN A HOSPITAL TOWARD THE 3-DAY INPATIENT HOSPITAL 
              REQUIREMENT FOR COVERAGE OF SKILLED NURSING FACILITY 
              SERVICES UNDER MEDICARE.

    (a) In General.--Section 1861(i) of the Social Security Act (42 
U.S.C. 1395x(i)) is amended by adding at the end the following: ``For 
purposes of this subsection, an individual receiving outpatient 
observation services shall be deemed to be an inpatient during such 
period, and the date such individual ceases receiving such services 
shall be deemed the hospital discharge date (unless such individual is 
admitted as a hospital inpatient at the end of such period).''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) shall 
apply to receipt of outpatient observation services beginning on or 
after January 1, 2013, but applies to a period of post-hospital 
extended care services that was completed before the date of the 
enactment of this Act only if an administrative appeal is or has been 
made with respect to such services not later than 90 days after the 
date of the enactment of this Act. Notwithstanding any other provision 
of law, the Secretary of Health and Human Services may implement such 
amendment through an interim final regulation, program instruction, or 
otherwise.
                                 <all>
```
----

Prior notification of a concentration

(Case COMP/M.3695 — BT/Radianz)

(2005/C 73/04)

(Text with EEA relevance)

----

(1)OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

----
BILL OF SALE


     County  of  Chautauqua  Industrial  Development  Agency,  a public  benefit
corporation  of the State of New York having an address at 200 Harrison  Street,
Jamestown,  New York 14701 (the "Grantor"),  for the consideration of One Dollar
($1.00) cash in hand paid, and other good and valuable consideration received by
the  Grantor  from  Dunkirk  International  Glass and  Ceramics  Corporation,  a
Delaware  corporation  having  its  principal  office at 181  Stegelske  Avenue,
Dunkirk,  New York  14048  (the  "Grantee"),  the  receipt  of  which is  hereby
acknowledged  by the Grantor,  hereby  sells,  transfers  and delivers  unto the
Grantee,  and its successors and assigns, all those items of equipment and other
tangible personal property (collectively,  the "Equipment") acquired in whole or
in part with the proceeds of those certain Solid Waste  Disposal  Facility Bonds
(Dunkirk  International Glass and Ceramics  Corporation  Project),  Series 1995,
issued by the Grantor  pursuant to that  certain  Trust  Indenture,  dated as of
March 1, 1995,  between the Grantor and United States Trust Company of New York,
as Trustee,  together with any additions to such Equipment, any replacements and
substitutes therefor and any proceeds thereof and including, without limitation,
all  equipment and other  tangible  personal  property  described in Exhibit A-1
attached hereto and made a part hereof.

     TO HAVE AND TO HOLD  the same  unto the  Grantee,  and its  successors  and
assigns forever.

     The Grantor  makes this sale to the Grantee "AS IS,  WHERE IS," WITHOUT ANY
WARRANTY,  EXPRESS OR IMPLIED,  AS TO ANY MATTER WHATSOEVER  INCLUDING,  WITHOUT
LIMITATION,  THE CONDITION OF THE EQUIPMENT,  ITS MERCHANTABILITY OR ITS FITNESS
FOR GENERAL PURPOSES OR FOR ANY SPECIFIC PURPOSE.  THIS SALE IS WITHOUT RECOURSE
AGAINST GRANTOR

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF,  the Grantor caused this Bill of Sale to be executed as
of September 4, 1997.

                                            COUNTY OF CHAUTAUQUA
                                            INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AGENCY


                                            By: /s/ Donald H. Burdick
                                                ---------------------
                                            Name:  Donald H. Burdick
                                            Title: Director