alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32

Certification of CEO and CFO Pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

as Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q of TPG Specialty Lending, Inc. (the Company) for the quarter ended March 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), Michael Fishman, as Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, and John Viola, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                    |  |                        
|------------------- |  | -----------------------
|/s/ Michael Fishman
|Name:               |  | Michael Fishman        
|Title:              |  | Chief Executive Officer
|Date:               |  | May 13, 2011           
|                   
|/s/ John E. Viola  
|Name:               |  | John E. Viola          
|Title:              |  | Chief Financial Officer
|Date:               |  | May 13, 2011
TabLe 1.

¡ rb

Classification Cr:iteria for

rl ß

Íi¿*äT.i".åtl::ry hazard conc¡r¡r for rqurrlc orsaa'rr er¡rored ro 

a

bcsthic orgaaltlr or asi¡¡l¡ rrtlcb È¡: dry weight sedi-aent and s 100.0 nE/kg

cr

j:lr, â:::: roríciÈv ha¡¡rd cosc.r'r for rrrr¡rrrfrr rildlif¡ r¡reclrr via

ErcE COtfCERtf :__-- lpro = 50.0 ng/kq ¡roDERÀÎE cotrcERN: Þ;; , 5õro- tttli and s soo.o as/ks

_ 

rþw cotfcERx: LD,'l > 5OO.O ma/ka

1.0 ng/L !r! ry/t and s 100.0 ng/L 100,0 mq/L

(5) tcutr torl,crËy Þ¡¡¡id coac¡à¡ for ¡lrratr r¡d rorl orgaatr¡¡ tbrough rotl coac¡åtsrttãi¡i--

Environmental Toxicity.

ÍfL:lï"?-t.-::::ctiy br.sd coac¡r¡¡ for. eque.tc r¡rerrr. rr¡ro.d

EIGE COI|CERI: ggro s t.O rig/kg dry reiEhÈ ¡oil HoDER.ÈIE coNcERN, !!;; I l:9 gstxt.oá ,-lõõ.0-åiire Iflll.COrCERtf : _eCr, > tOO .O-lliihl

cbr¡,lcrl l,¡ rttort -f-' -r¡-b's -¡Es¿'r l¡Itcll Erca COÑCZ_n¡¡, ch¡oaic "ío" c 0.1 gle/L HODERÀTE CONCERI: eb¡'onic vatue, õ.i -_ã71 æd 1 . tO.O ¡rE/L rotf cotfcERrf : . chro¡ic viruð , ió.0-ñsi',-.- ---- -l

.a. (7) .tpo.!d ctroolc ÈorJ,elÈ¡z h¡r¡rd coac.EÀr for be¡tåic orgaatrr¡ oa ¡¡ii¡t¡ tà¡t ttrosgb cooÈuls¡t¡d t¡¿f¡¡ãt¡i---

iösË"r#"äãilå"",,, :i:::i:;:ii: Í i.i EäiH îi*;,fftii".

coac.Fa! for Ë¡rs¡¡triel rildltfr r¡recirt via

:99.9 asl.kE dr¡r .weigbr food

?99:0-^Elï-g a¡á s ¡õ00,0 nE/ks . 1000. 0 ¡'a/ka

dl¡t or food¡

õvyÉã.¡.sl. r,vñrJE¡r¡r: cnron¡c valuc ? 9:t-Àçr/!-g ¡¡¿ f ¡{t.O.urE/kg IPI{ COttCER¡ta cb¡onic value > 10. O åaito-

{i}"ül':]iï :!Iå:å:Litî:::: coEc.FEr for pr't¡ ¡¡d rou orsrar,¡r¡ rr¡,o'd

c v¡lue -s iq O mgt-l<Z dry weight food . e v¡luc ì ?9:o-rEr!_s aaä r rõ0-o-iã/rg c value > t00.0 nqlka

.clt¡r b¡¡¡¡d coac.aa. for È¡s¡rrtirrl rlldltf¡ rprciÚ vJ.a

EfGE CONCER!| : . chroaic valuc. 

g.l DE/

\E dry weight soil 

À

b

i

l

å 
Table 2.

when only thê octanol/rate¡ patÈÍtion

4.3 and s g. O 3.5 and < {.3 3.5

cLassification

the bioconcent¡aÈion factor gug a¡rd the gCF ia based on t iD eater:

0

a¡¡d < -1000

atl

criteria Environ¡nentaL Fate.

(3) ffii.gtüË:rff;ä3.,t'*l',tlro Go¡rricr¡¡t (t'e 4') ' srROl¡G soRpfroll .-.--' .- ¡.s, bur < a.5 lþDERÀrE sonpt¡orr I z.s, bur < 3.5

- Iótf SORglfOtl ,- r Ê L¡-r

({) llodrgrredrÈÍoa.

¡{Ecr.rcrBpE soRprrox . i:;

of, s f ¿¡yg of s 28 dåye of s 28 dri, cl > 2a d,ave

\

i0,000 ppn

J:!00 ppr 19 lo, ooo ppn r00 pFtr to 1,000 ppn"

9.1 ppr Êo too pFrtar coattUtr- Ia

> l0-¡ < l0-¡, but : < lO't. but ¡ < lo-t, bi¡c : < lo't ¡t¡-rt/rol¡). I 0't I 0't ¡o't
a
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

## FILED July 8, 2004 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-50988 Summary Calendar

EARLEEN PINE; ET AL., Plaintiffs
EARLEEN PINE; HOYLE S. KRUSE; DONALD B. DULIN; PATRICIA A. DULIN; MARY V. RENTON; TENA J. SHEPHERD; MICHAEL L. SHEPARD; JACK FITTS; JAN FITTS, Plaintiffs-Appellants

versus CITY OF MIDLAND, also known as City of Midland, Texas; RICK MENCHACA; GARY SAUNDERS, Defendants-Appellees.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. MO-02-CV-112

-------------------- Before BARKSDALE, EMILIO M. GARZA, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * The appellants-property owners appeal from the summary judgment dismissal of their 42 U.S.C. § 1983 claims as barred by the statute of limitations. Applying the same test as theNo. 03-50988 -2- district court, we affirm. See Deas v. River West, L.P. , 152 F.3d 471, 475 (5th Cir. 1998). We hold that the district court did not err in its determination that equitable tolling did not apply in the instant case and, therefore, that the § 1983 claims were barred by Texas’s two-year limitations period for personal injury actions.
See Owens v. Okure , 488 U.S. 235, 249-50 (1989); Henson-El v. Rogers , 923 F.2d 51, 52 (5th Cir. 1991). We do not consider the appellants arguments raised for the first time on appeal that (1) application of the two-year limitations period is unconstitutional as applied to their Fifth Amendment takings claims and (2) fairness mandates the application of the equitable doctrine of laches. See Leverette v. Louisville Ladder Co. , 183 F.3d 339, 342 (5th Cir. 1999).
AFFIRMED.
#### STATE ex rel. LAWRENCE v. TURNER.

No. 37064.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Feb. 1968.

Certiorari denied without opinion.
Exhibit 10.40


 


AMENDMENT NO. 2 TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT







This Amendment No. 2 to Employment Agreement (this "Amendment") is entered into this __ day of February 2014, by and among PINNACLE BANK, a Tennessee state-chartered bank (the "Bank"), PINNACLE FINANCIAL PARTNERS, INC., a Tennessee corporation (the "Company") (collectively, the Bank and the Company are referred to hereinafter as the "Employer") and MICHAEL TERRY TURNER (the "Executive").







WHEREAS, the Bank, the Company and the Executive are parties to that certain Employment Agreement dated January 1, 2008 (the "Employment Agreement"), pursuant to which the Executive serves as President and Chief Executive Officer of the Bank and the Company;







WHEREAS, the Bank, the Company and the Executive are parties to that certain Amendment No. 1 to Employment Agreement dated November 20, 2012; and







WHEREAS, each of the Bank, the Company and the Executive desires to further amend the Employment Agreement.







NOW THEREFORE, the parties, intending to be legally bound, hereby agree as follows:







1.            Capitalized Terms.  Capitalized terms used and not otherwise defined herein shall have the meanings ascribed thereto in the Employment Agreement.







2.            Amendment to Employment Agreement. The Employment Agreement is hereby amended as follows:







(a)            Section 4.7 of the Employment Agreement is hereby deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following:







4.7 VACATION.  On a non-cumulative basis, the Executive shall be entitled to six (6) weeks of vacation in each successive twelve-month period during the Term, during which his compensation shall be paid in full.







3.            Except as expressly modified hereby, the Employment Agreement shall remain in full force and effect.







4.            This Amendment may be executed in counterparts, each of which will be deemed an original, but all of which shall constitute one and the same instrument.







[remainder of page intentionally left blank]









      IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Amendment No. 2 to be executed as of the date first above written.







PINNACLE FINANCIAL PARTNERS, INC.







	
 

	
PINNACLE FINANCIAL PARTNERS, INC.


	
 

	
By:

	
/s/ Harold R. Carpenter


	
 

	
Name:

	
Harold R. Carpenter


	
 

	
Title:

	
Chief Financial Officer


	
 

	
 

	
 


	
 

	
PINNACLE BANK


	
 

	
By:

	
/s/ Harold R. Carpenter


	
 

	
Name:

	
Harold R. Carpenter


	
 

	
Title:

	
Chief Financial Officer


	
 

	
 

	
 


	
 

	
EXECUTIVE


	
 

	
 

	
/s/ M. Terry Turner


	
 

	
 

	
Michael Terry Turner
<page>





					  EXHIBIT 32.02


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Annual Report of Morgan Stanley Spectrum
Strategic L.P. (the "Partnership") on Form 10-K for the period
ended December 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Jeffrey D. Hahn,
Chief Financial Officer, Demeter Management Corporation, the
general partner of the Partnership, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-
Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

	(1)		The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

	(2)	The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Partnership.








By:	/s/Jeffrey D. Hahn

Name:	   Jeffrey D. Hahn
Title:	   Chief Financial Officer

Date:	   March 15, 2004
DENIED and Opinion Filed December 1, 2023 

# S

In The 

### Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-23-01198-CV IN RE CHI YEN TRAN, Relator Original Proceeding from the 469th Judicial District Court Collin County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 469-55653-2018 MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Partida-Kipness, Carlyle, and Garcia Opinion by Justice Garcia In her November 28, 2023 petition for writ of manda mus, relator contends that the trial court’s July 7, 2023 Agr eed Final Judgment is void and should be vacated. Entitlement to mandamus relief requires a relator to show that the trial court clearly abused its discretion and that the re lator lacks an adequa te appellate remedy. In re Prudential Ins. Co. of Am. , 148 S.W.3d 124, 135–36 (Tex. 2004) (orig. proceeding). After reviewing relator’s petiti on and the record before us, we conclude that relator has failed to demonstrate entitlement to mandamus relief.–2– Accordingly, we deny the petition for writ of mandamus. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 52.8(a). We also strike relator’s petition and attached appendix because it contains unredacted sensitive data in violation of rule 9.9. See T EX . R. A PP . P. 9.9.

231198F.P05 /Dennise Garcia/ DENNISE GARCIA JUSTICE
United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 99-2837

___________

Executive Corners Office Building; *

Irvin Galstad, Dr., DDS, Ltd.; John *

Mahowald, dba Dacotah Leather *

Company; Team Electronics, dba *

Electronics Marketing, Inc.; W & L, *

Inc., dba Cherished Moments; *

Johnston-Miller, Inc., dba Lifestyles; *

Ram Enterprises, Inc., dba Hanky Panky *

Gift Shoppe and Gallery; Daniel L. *

Spiros, dba Service Shoe Shop; Pure *

Plus Dry Cleaners, Inc., dba Pure Plus *

Cleaners, dba Hour Glass Cleaners; * Appeal from the United States

SMS, Inc., dba The Bottle Shop; Ivan R. * District Court for the District

Jensen; JCM, Inc., dba Miller's True * of North Dakota.

Value Hardware; Red River Optical, *

Inc., dba Duling Optical; Don Lindgren, * [UNPUBLISHED]

dba Sorlie Building, 319-323 Demers; *

Stan's Communication, Inc., *

*

Appellants, *

*

v. *

*

Maryland Insurance Company, *

*

Appellee. *

___________

Submitted: May 10, 2000

Filed: May 18, 2000 
*The Honorable Jimm Larry Hendren, Chief Judge, United States District Court

for the Western District of Arkansas, sitting by designation.

-2-

___________

Before WOLLMAN, Chief Judge, FAGG, Circuit Judge, and HENDREN,* District

Judge.

___________

PER CURIAM.

This diversity-based lawsuit concerns a coverage dispute between the Appellants

and Maryland Insurance Company. Contrary to the Appellants' view that the policy

provided coverage for sewer and drain backup damage, the district court concluded the

policy language excluding coverage was unambiguous and granted the insurance

company summary judgment. We review a grant of summary judgment under a wellestablished standard. Because this is a diversity case, we review de novo questions of

state law. After reviewing the record and the parties' briefs, we are satisfied the district

court correctly applied state law and properly resolved the coverage dispute. Believing

that an extended opinion by this court would have no precedential value in this diversity

case, we affirm on the basis of the district court's ruling without further discussion. See

8th Cir. R. 47B.

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 13-6167

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

TSAIKUWN ALDAGO HAIRSTON,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western 

District of Virginia, at Danville. Jackson L. Kiser, Senior 

District Judge. (4:08-cr-00022-JLK-RSB-1; 4:12-cv-80403-JLKRSB)

Submitted: June 13, 2013 Decided: June 17, 2013

Before NIEMEYER, KING, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Tsaikuwn Aldago Hairston, Appellant Pro Se. Ronald Andrew 

Bassford, Assistant United States Attorney, Roanoke, Virginia, 

for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Tsaikuwn Aldago Hairston seeks to appeal the district 

court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 

Supp. 2012) motion. The order is not appealable unless a 

circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 

28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B) (2006). A certificate of 

appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of 

the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) 

(2006). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a 

prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that 

reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s 

assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. 

Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller-El v. 

Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003). When the district court 

denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must 

demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is 

debatable, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the 

denial of a constitutional right. Slack, 529 U.S. at 484-85. 

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude 

that Hairston has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, 

we deny Hairston’s motion for a certificate of appealability and 

dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the 

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the 
3

materials before this court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process.

DISMISSED
# Diario Oficial C 222I/2021

| | ISSN 1977-0928 |
| --- | --- |
| Diario Oficial
  de la Unión Europea | C 222I |
| | |
| Edición en lengua española | Comunicaciones e informaciones | 64.° año11 de junio de 2021 |

ISSN 1977-0928

Diario Oficial

de la Unión Europea

C 222I

Edición en lengua española

Comunicaciones e informaciones

64.° año11 de junio de 2021

---

| Sumario | Página |
| --- | --- |
| | II   Comunicaciones |
| | COMUNICACIONES PROCEDENTES DE LAS INSTITUCIONES, ÓRGANOS Y ORGANISMOS DE LA UNIÓN EUROPEA |
| | Consejo |
| 2021/C 222 I/01 | Declaración de la Comisión | 1 |

Sumario

Página

II   Comunicaciones

COMUNICACIONES PROCEDENTES DE LAS INSTITUCIONES, ÓRGANOS Y ORGANISMOS DE LA UNIÓN EUROPEA

Consejo

2021/C 222 I/01

Declaración de la Comisión

1

---

| ES | |
| --- | --- |

ES

---

II Comunicaciones

COMUNICACIONES PROCEDENTES DE LAS INSTITUCIONES, ÓRGANOS Y ORGANISMOS DE LA UNIÓN EUROPEA

Consejo

| 11.6.2021 | ES | Diario Oficial de la Unión Europea | CI 222/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.6.2021

ES

Diario Oficial de la Unión Europea

CI 222/1

---

Declaración de la Comisión

(2021/C 222 I/01)

La Comisión reconoce la importancia de un programa común de capacitación y formación en materia de concesión de licencias y control del cumplimiento para un sistema eficaz de control de las exportaciones. La Comisión, en consulta con el Grupo de coordinación sobre productos de doble uso, se compromete a estudiar las repercusiones en términos de recursos humanos y financieros que pueda implicar dicho programa, con vistas a determinar las opciones para el diseño, las modalidades y el desarrollo de un programa de capacitación y formación.

---
EXHIBIT 32.2



CERTIFICATION



I, Greg S. Lea, Chief Financial Officer of Pemstar Inc. (the Company), certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that;



| | 1. | The Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the annual period ended March 31, 2004 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
Seurities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Date: June 11, 2004



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ Greg S. Lea        
|Greg S. Lea            
|Chief Financial Officer
### Martin , Michae l (OST ) Po" ^ -QS r - ^to)?^

- n^4( ^ From : leedru m[leedrum@att.net ] Sent : Monday , April 19 , 201 0 8:0 1 A M To : EA S (OST ) Subject : Re : Altoona-Blair Co , P Aservice Th e Altoon a Mirro r ha s publishe d a narticl e statin g tha t yo u ar e collectin g comment s regardin g commercia l servic e a t thi s airport . I ama n Altoon a residen t tha t ha s bee nusin g thi s airpor t sinc e I lef t fo r th e Armyi n 196 9 (AlleghenyAi r a t tha t time) . Ove r th e year s I hav e see n servic e declin e and the n ge t better . I hav e bee n mostl ysatisfie d wit hth e curren t servic e provide d b yColga n fro mDulles . Mos t o f m yflight s hav e bee n o ntim e and comfortable . I woul d recommen d tha t yo u retai n thei r service . Than k you j Le e Applema n 240 0 Bel l Avenu e ;-? Altoona , PA16602-331 0 z i leedrum(a)att.ne t 'C D

C 5
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Brian Humphrey, Appellant.

(Appeal No. 1.)

Appeal unanimously dismissed. Memorandum: There is ample evidence in the record of the plea proceedings to establish that defendant’s waiver of his right to appeal, which was part of his negotiated plea bargain, was knowingly, voluntarily and intelligently entered *(see, People v Moissett,*76 NY2d 909; *People v Seaberg,*74 NY2d 1; *People v Lesesne,*172 AD2d 1070 [decided herewith]). Accordingly, the defendant’s appeals are dismissed. (Appeal from Judgment of Supreme Court, Erie County, Rossetti, J.—Criminal Possession Forged Instrument, 3rd Degree.) Present—Callahan, J. P., Denman, Green, Pine and Lowery, JJ.
#### ROBINSON v. WALDREP DAIRY, INC.

No. 29323.

Supreme Court of Florida.

March 1970.

Certiorari denied without opinion. 228 So.2d 610.
#### In the Matter of Richard H. Cataldi, an Attorney, Respondent. Grievance Committee of the Eighth Judicial District, Petitioner.

Resignation accepted, name stricken from the roll of attorneys and restitution ordered. Present— Boomer, J. P., Pine, Balio, Lawton and Davis, JJ. (Order entered Apr. 17, 1991.)
Exhibit 8LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES         Jurisdiction of  Subsidiary Company OrganizationI. EMPAQUES DE CARTON TITAN, S.A. DE C.V. Mexico  A. Cartonpack, S.A. de C.V. Mexico  B. Envases y Empaques de México, S.A. de C.V. Mexico  C. Industrias Centauro, S.A. de C.V. MexicoII. DURANGO INTERNACIONAL, S.A. DE C.V. Mexico  A. Empaques del Norte, S.A. de C.V. MexicoIII. DURANGO INTERANTIONAL, INC. New Mexico, U.S.A.  A. Durango McKinley Paper Company New Mexico, U.S.A.  B. Fiber Management of Texas, Inc. Texas, U.S.A.IV. COMPANIA PAPELERA DE ATENQUIQUE, S.A. DE C.V. MexicoV. PONDEROSA INDUSTRIAL DE MEXICO, S.A. DE C.V. Mexico  A. Inmobiliaria Industrial Tizayuca, S.A. de C.V. Mexico  B. Papel y Empaques Tizayuca, S.A. de C.V. MexicoVI. PORTEADORES DE DURANGO, S.A. DE C.V. Mexico  A. Reciclajes Centauro, S.A. de C.V. Mexico  B. Compañia Norteamericana de Inversiones enCelulosa y Papel, S.A. de C.V. MexicoVII. ADMINISTRACION CORPORATIVA DE DURANGO, S.A. DE C.V. Mexico  A. Lineas Aéreas Ejecutivas de Durango, S.A. de C.V. MexicoVIII. GRUPO PIPSAMEX, S.A. DE C.V. Mexico  A. Fabricas de Papel Tuxtepec, S.A. de C.V. Mexico  B. Fabrica Mexicana de Papel, S.A. de C.V. Mexico  C. Fibras de Durango, S.A. de C.V. Mexico  D. Papeles Forma-Todo, S.A. de C.V. Mexico  F.Immobiliaria Industrial de Durango, S.A. de C.V. MexicoIX. COMPANIA FORESTAL DE DURANGO, S.A. DE C.V. Mexico  A. Servicios Industriales Tizayuca, S.A. de C.V. Mexico
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Election Commission

# TIME AND DATE:

 Thursday, September 6, 2018 at 2:00 p.m.

# PLACE:

 1050 First Street NE, Washington, DC.

# STATUS:

 This meeting will be closed to the public.

      ( print page 44877)    

# MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:

Compliance matters pursuant to 52 U.S.C. 30109

Matters concerning participation in civil actions or proceedings or arbitration

* * * * *

# CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION:

 Judith Ingram, Press Officer, Telephone: (202) 694-1220.

Laura E. Sinram,

Deputy Secretary of the Commission.

[FR Doc. 2018-19230 Filed 8-30-18; 4:15 pm]

 BILLING CODE 6715-01-P