alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 4.1



COMMON STOCK                          COMMON STOCK
PAR VALUE $.01                                    PAR VALUE $.01
        SHARES
SEE REVERSE FOR CERTAIN
DEFINITIONS AND LIMITATIONS  CUSIP 462211103

IONIC FUEL TECHNOLOGY, INC.
INCORPORATED UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

THIS CERTIFIES THAT
IS THE OWNER OF
FULLY PAID AND NON-ASSESSABLE SHARES OF COMMON STOCK, OF
IONIC FUEL TECHNOLOGY, INC. (hereinafter called the Corporation) transferable on
the  books of the  Corporation  or by the  holder  hereof,  in person or by duly
authorized Attorney,  upon surrender of this Certificate properly endorsed. This
Certificate  is not valid until  countersigned  and  registered  by the Transfer
Agent and Registrar.

WITNESS the facsimile seal of the  Corporation  and the facsimile  signatures of
its duly authorized officers.

Dated:

Countersigned and Registered:

CONTINENTAL STOCK TRANSFER & TRUST COMPANY
Transfer Agent and Registrar


AUTHORIZED SIGNATURE
SECRETARY
PRESIDENT

The following  abbreviations,  when used in the  inscription on the face of this
certificate,  shall  be  constured  as  though  they  were  written  out in full
according to applicable laws or regulations:

TEN COM - as tenants in common
TEN ENT - as tenants by the entireties
JT TEN - as joint  tenants  with  right of  survivorship  and not as  tenants in
common UNIF GIFT MIN ACT - Custodian
                    (Cust)       (Minor)
                    Under Uniform Gifts to Minor Act
                                  (State)
Addtional abbreviations may also be used though not in the above list.



For Value received          hereby sell, assign and transfer unto


                                                                   32

<PAGE>



PLEASE INSERT SOCIAL SECURITY OR OTHER
IDENTIFYING NUMBER OF ASSIGNEE


(NAME AND ADDRESS OF TRANSFEREE SHOULD BE PRINTED OR TYPEWRITTEN)

Shares of the Common Stock  represented by the within  Certificate and do hereby
irrevocably  constitute  and appoint  Attorney to transfer the said stock on the
books of the within-named Corporation with
full power of substitution in the premises.

Dated
SIGNATURE

Signature(s) Guaranteed


By

THE SIGNATURE(S) MUST BE GUARANTEED BY AN ELIGIBLE GUARANTOR INSTITUTION (Banks,
Stockbrokers, Savings and Loan Associations and Credit Unions WITH MEMBERSHIP IN
AN APPROVED SIGNATURE GUARANTEE PROGRAM) PURSUANT TO S.E.C. RULE 17Ad-1 5.

NOTICE:     The signature of this assignment must correspond with name(s) as
written upon the face of the certificate in every particular without alteration
or enlargement or any change whatever.


                                                                   33

<PAGE>
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 174 (Friday, September 7, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Page 45469]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-19550]



[[Page 45469]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Foreign Claims Settlement Commission

[F.C.S.C. Meeting and Hearing Notice No. 8-18]


Sunshine Act Meeting

    The Foreign Claims Settlement Commission, pursuant to its 
regulations (45 CFR part 503.25) and the Government in the Sunshine Act 
(5 U.S.C. 552b), hereby gives notice in regard to the scheduling of 
open meetings as follows:
    Tuesday, September 18, 2018: 9:30 a.m.--Issuance of Proposed 
Decisions in claims against Iraq.
    10:30 a.m.--Issuance of Proposed Decisions under the Guam World War 
II Loyalty Recognition Act, Title XVII, Public Law 114-328.

Status: Open.
    All meetings are held at the Foreign Claims Settlement Commission, 
601 D Street NW, Suite 10300, Washington, DC. Requests for information, 
or advance notices of intention to observe an open meeting, may be 
directed to: Patricia M. Hall, Foreign Claims Settlement Commission, 
601 D Street NW, Suite 10300, Washington, DC 20579. Telephone: (202) 
616-6975.

Brian M. Simkin,
Chief Counsel.
[FR Doc. 2018-19550 Filed 9-5-18; 11:15 am]
 BILLING CODE 4410-BA-P
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE

F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

O RDER

Appellate case name: Victor Keith Wilson v. The State of Texas

Appellate case number: 01

- 18

- 00509

- CR

Trial court case number: 95CR0904

Trial court: 10th District Court of Galveston County

Although the supplemental record indicates that a copy of the record was sent to appellant
by the trial court clerk, appellant has filed a motion asserting that he did not receive the record and
requests (1) another copy of the record and (2) an ex tension of time to file his pro se response to appointed counsel’s Anders brief . The motion is GRANTED.

The trial court clerk shall , no later than 10 days from the date of this order, provide a nother copy of the record, including the clerk’s record, the r eporter’s record, and any supplemental
records, to appellant. The trial court clerk shall further certify to this Court, within 15 days of the
date of this order, the date upon which delivery of the record to appellant is made.

Appellant’s pro se response to appointed counsel’s brief shall be filed within 6 0 days of

the date of this order . No further extensions will be granted.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature:

___

/s/ Sarah B eth Landau

_____

Acting individually

Date:

__ May 23, 2019

_
II 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 5 

To reauthorize the Violence Against Women Act of 1994. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 22 (legislative day, JANUARY 3), 2013 

Mr. REID (for himself, Mr. DURBIN, Mr. SCHUMER, Ms. STABENOW, Mrs. 

GILLIBRAND, Mr. UDALL of New Mexico, Mrs. SHAHEEN, Mr. WARNER, 

Mr. SCHATZ, Mrs. FEINSTEIN, Mr. BROWN, Mr. TESTER, Mr. COONS, 

Mr. WHITEHOUSE, Mr. BAUCUS, Ms. HIRONO, Mr. BEGICH, Mr. SANDERS, Mr. CASEY, Mr. BLUMENTHAL, Ms. KLOBUCHAR, Mr. LAUTENBERG, Mrs. BOXER, Mr. LEVIN, Mr. ROCKEFELLER, and Mr. HEINRICH) 

introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the 

Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To reauthorize the Violence Against Women Act of 1994. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SENSE OF THE SENATE. 

4 It is the sense of the Senate that Congress should— 

5 (1) reauthorize the Violence Against Women 

6 Act of 1994 (42 U.S.C. 13925 et seq.) (referred to 

7 in this section as ‘‘VAWA’’), a landmark bipartisan 

8 bill that has dramatically improved the national re9 sponse to domestic and sexual violence; 


pwalker on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with 
2 

•S 5 IS

1 (2) renew the commitment of the United States 

2 to providing the resources necessary to combat all 

3 forms of domestic violence, sexual assault, dating vi4 olence, and stalking, including important new initia5 tives to reduce homicides, increase the focus on pre6 venting and responding to sexual assault, and make 

7 women on college campuses safer from domestic and 

8 sexual violence; 

9 (3) build upon the success of VAWA in trans10 forming the criminal justice and community-based 

11 response to abuse by bolstering and streamlining the 

12 programs, grants, and coalitions created by VAWA 

13 and expanding the reach of VAWA to meet the re14 maining unmet needs of victims; 

15 (4) continue to provide the training, tools, and 

16 resources necessary for law enforcement officers and 

17 victim service providers to hold the perpetrators of 

18 domestic and sexual violence accountable and to 

19 keep victims safe; and 

20 (5) ensure that all victims of domestic and sex21 ual violence, including Native American women, gay 

22 and lesbian victims, and battered immigrant women, 

23 receive the support and protections provided by 

24 VAWA. 

Æ 


pwalker on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Charles Pelto, Appellant.

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Defendant, who chose to defend himself *pro se*at his trial, contends on appeal that the trial court erred by allowing him to represent himself because he did not knowingly, intelligently and voluntarily waive his right to counsel. We disagree. The record reveals that, at each of the various *1028pretrial proceedings and again immediately prior to the trial, defendant was fully advised by the court of his right to counsel and of the dangers and disadvantages attendant upon his waiver of that fundamental right. Further, the court appointed counsel as an advisor to assist defendant if defendant so desired. Pursuant to CPL 730.30, the court ordered a competency examination which found defendant competent to assist in his defense. We conclude, therefore, that defendant’s decision to proceed *pro se*was based upon an intelligent, knowing, voluntary and unequivocal waiver of his right to counsel *(see, People v McIntyre,*36 NY2d 10, 17; *see also, People v Smith,*68 NY2d 737, *cert denied*479 US 953; *People v Sawyer,*57 NY2d 12, 22, *cert denied*459 US 1178).

We find that the trial court properly concluded, pursuant to CPL 65.30, that a witness was a vulnerable child warranting the use of two-way closed-circuit televised testimony out of the presence of defendant *(see,*CPL art 65; *People v Cintron,*75 NY2d 249). We find no basis to modify the sentence imposed. The imposition of consecutive terms of imprisonment was proper since these crimes involve disparate and distinct acts *(see, People v Brathwaite,*63 NY2d 839, 842-843; *People v Barber,*162 AD2d 955, *lv denied*76 NY2d 937). (Appeal from Judgment of Ontario County Court, Houston, J.—Rape, 2nd Degree.) Present—Doerr, J. P., Boomer, Balio, Lawton and Davis, JJ.
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NO. AP-76,646

EX PARTE SHERRI FREDERICK, Applicant

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

CAUSE NO. 1277741-B IN THE 339 JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT

TH

FROM HARRIS COUNTY

Per curiam.

O P I N I O N

Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the

clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte

Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant pleaded guilty to possession of a

controlled substance and was sentenced to six months’ state jail imprisonment. She did not appeal

her conviction. 

Applicant contends that she is actually innocent of the offense to which she pleaded guilty. 

Applicant was arrested on September 12, 2010. The substance she possessed was sent to the

Houston Police Department crime lab for testing, but testing was not completed until February 23,
2

2011. The results of the testing were not available until more than four months after Applicant

entered a negotiated plea of guilty, on October 1, 2010. The results of the testing showed no

controlled substance in the evidence gathered from Applicant’s arrest. 

The trial court has determined that Applicant is entitled to relief on the basis of actual

innocence. See Ex parte Tuley, 109 S.W.3d 388 (Tex. Crim. App. 2002). Relief is granted. The

judgment in Cause No. 1277741 in the 339th Judicial District Court of Harris County is set aside,

and Applicant is remanded to the custody of the sheriff of Harris County to answer the charges as

set out in the indictment. The trial court shall issue any necessary bench warrant within 10 days after

the mandate of this Court issues.

Copies of this opinion shall be sent to the Texas Department of Criminal Justice–Correctional

Institutions Division and Pardons and Paroles Division.

Delivered: September 28, 2011

Do Not Publish
----

----

I Tiedonantoja

Komissio

----

Euron kurssi (1)

22. huhtikuuta 2005

(2005/C 99/01)

1 euro= 

----

(1)

Lähde: Euroopan keskuspankin ilmoittama viitekurssi.

----

----

Ennakkoilmoitus yrityskeskittymästä

(Asia COMP/M.3776 — Vodafone/Oskar Mobile)

(2005/C 99/02)

(ETA:n kannalta merkityksellinen teksti)

----

(1)EUVL L 24, 29.1.2004, s. 1.

----

----

Ilmoitetun keskittymän vastustamatta jättäminen

(Asia COMP/M.3716 — AS Watson/Marionnaud)

(2005/C 99/03)

(ETA:n kannalta merkityksellinen teksti)

Komissio päätti 7. huhtikuuta 2005 olla vastustamatta edellä mainittua keskittymää ja julistaa, että se soveltuu yhteismarkkinoille. Päätös perustuu neuvoston asetuksen (EY) N:o 139/2004 6 artiklan 1 kohdan b alakohtaan. Päätöksen koko teksti on saatavissa vain englannin kielellä, ja se julkistetaan sen jälkeen, kun siitä on poistettu kaikki sen mahdollisesti sisältämät liikesalaisuudet. Se on saatavissa:

----

----

Komission ilmoitus polkumyyntitullien palauttamisesta

(2005/C 99/04)

Euroopan yhteisöjen virallisessa lehdessä julkaistiin 29. toukokuuta 2002 ilmoitus 2002/C 127/06 (1), jossa esitettiin suuntaviivat neuvoston asetuksen (EY) N:o 384/96 (2) polkumyyntitullien palauttamista koskevan 11 artiklan 8 kohdan soveltamiseksi.

Euroopan yhteisön laajennuttua 1. toukokuuta 2004 kyseinen ilmoitus on käännetty yhteisöön liittyneiden valtioiden kielille, ja kaikkien osapuolten yhdenvertaisen ja oikeudenmukaisen kohtelun varmistamiseksi ilmoitus julkaistaan nyt uudelleen Euroopan unionin virallisessa lehdessä yhteisön uusilla virallisilla kielillä.

----

(1)EYVL C 127, 29.5.2002, s.10.

(2)EYVL L 56, 6.3.1996, s. 1. Asetus sellaisena kuin se on viimeksi muutettuna asetuksella (EY) N:o 461/2004 (EUVL L 77, 13.3.2004, s. 12).

----
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 175 (Monday, September 10, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Page 45595]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-19504]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE


Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request

    The Department of Commerce will submit to the Office of Management 
and Budget (OMB) for clearance the following proposal for collection of 
information under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 
U.S.C. Chapter 35).
    Agency: National Institute of Standards and Technology, Commerce.
    Title: Analysis of Exoskeleton-Use for Enhancing Human Performance 
Data Collection.
    OMB Control Number: 0693-XXXX.
    Form Number(s): None (new submission).
    Type of Request: Regular.
    Number of Respondents: 180.
    Average Hours per Response: 10 minutes.
    Burden Hours: 30 hours.
    Needs and Uses: NIST's Engineering Laboratory will be developing 
methods to evaluate performance of exoskeletons in two key areas (1) 
The fit and motion of the exoskeleton device with respect to the users' 
body and (2) The impact that using an exoskeleton has on the 
performance of users executing tasks that are representative of 
activities in industrial settings. The results of these experiments 
will inform future test method development at NIST, other 
organizations, and under the purview of the new American Society for 
Testing Materials (ASTM) Committee F48 on Exoskeletons and Exosuits.
    Affected Public: Individuals participating in the study.
    Frequency: On occasion.
    Respondent's Obligation: Voluntary.
    This information collection request may be viewed at reginfo.gov. 
Follow the instructions to view Department of Commerce collections 
currently under review by OMB.
    Written comments and recommendations for the proposed information 
collection should be sent within 30 days of publication of this notice 
to <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#6e21273c2f313d1b0c03071d1d0701002e01030c400b011e40090118"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="713e3823302e2204131c180202181e1f311e1c135f141e015f161e07">[email protected]</span></a> or fax to (202) 395-5806.

Sheleen Dumas,
Departmental Lead PRA Officer, Office of the Chief Information Officer.
[FR Doc. 2018-19504 Filed 9-7-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 3510-13-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
----

Action brought on 11 February 2005 by European Dynamics S.A. against the European Food Safety Authority

(Case T-69/05)

(2005/C 106/70)

Language of the case: English

An action against the European Food Safety Authority was brought before the Court of First Instance of the European Communities on 11 February 2005 by European Dynamics S.A., established in Athens (Greece), represented by N. Korogiannakis, lawyer.

The applicant claims that the Court should:

Pleas in law and main arguments

The applicant company filed a bid in response to EFSA's call for tenders EFSA/IT/00012 (1) for the software and services for establishing an Extranet between the Members States' national agencies, EFSA and the European Commission. By the contested decision the applicant's bid was rejected and the contract awarded to another bidder.

In support of its application to annul the contested decisions the applicant contends that the defendant violated the Financial Regulation (2) as well as Article 17(1) of Directive 92/50 (3) by using evaluation criteria, that were not well specified in the call for tenders. According to the applicant, by accepting without any further processing and cross-checking the opinion of officers of the tenderer's clients, EFSA attributed part of its evaluation rights to third parties. The applicant further argues that under Directive 92/50 the satisfaction of a bidder's clients cannot be taken into account in order to exclude the bidder but can only be used as an ‘award criterion’.

The applicant also claims that the defendant committed manifest errors of appreciation in the evaluation of the bid it had submitted. The applicant contests certain statements contained in the report of the Evaluation Committee, regarding the fact that one of the applicant's clients had neither purchased nor used the product offered by the applicant and the fact that another Community institution was not satisfied with the applicant's product. The applicant also considers, in the same context, that the method used by EFSA during the evaluation procedure, consisting in simple telephone calls without any official requests nor cross-checks of the information received, was inadequate and in itself suffices in order to establish a manifest error of assessment.

The applicant finally submits that the defendant failed to provide adequate reasons for its decision, in violation of Article 253 EC.

----

(1)  OJ 2004/S 153-132262.

(2)  Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002 of 25 June 2002 on the Financial Regulation applicable to the general budget of the European Communities, OJ L 248, 16/09/2002, p. 1.

(3)  Council Directive 92/50/EEC of 18 June 1992 relating to the coordination of procedures for the award of public service contracts, OJ L 209, 24/07/1992, p. 1.

----
PETITION FOR EXEMPTION - FAA 333

Edgar Allen Mixon 104 Via Sonoma San Clemente, Ca 92673 I am currently a licensed Private Pilot. Airplane Single Engine Land. Instrument Airplane. This license was issued 11 - 27 - 1994. Certificate no. 549463827 I intend to use an unmanned aircraft for the purpose of photography work, primarily in the Real Estate industry for commercial purposes. The use of this device is to help promote public awareness regarding subject properties that may be considered for purchase . Operations will be during daylight hours, and conducted outside of any restricted areas, or any other situation that might be considered unsafe. All operations will be constrained to line - of- sight. The unit also has a visual display, which allows complete control of the operation and the data associated with it. Height will be constrained to less than 400 feet above ground level. The product I am using is a DJI quad - copter model Phantom 3 Professional, using a Sony camera, which is permanently attached. Additional information regarding this unit may be obtained at www.DJI.com
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 170 (Friday, August 31, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Pages 44638-44639]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-18904]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of General Medical Sciences; Notice of Closed 
Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of General Medical 
Sciences Special Emphasis Panel; Review of Support of Competitive 
Research (SCORE) Award Applications.
    Date: October 15, 2018.

[[Page 44639]]

    Time: 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: Hyatt Regency Bethesda, One Bethesda Metro Center, 7400 
Wisconsin Avenue, Bethesda, MD 20814.
    Contact Person: Brian R. Pike, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, 
Office of Scientific Review, National Institute of General Medical 
Sciences, National Institutes of Health, 45 Center Drive, Room 
3AN18, Bethesda, MD 20892, 301-594-3907, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#295940424c4b5b694448404507474041074e465f"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="25554c4e4047576548444c490b4b4c4d0b424a53">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.375, 
Minority Biomedical Research Support; 93.821, Cell Biology and 
Biophysics Research; 93.859, Pharmacology, Physiology, and 
Biological Chemistry Research; 93.862, Genetics and Developmental 
Biology Research; 93.88, Minority Access to Research Careers; 93.96, 
Special Minority Initiatives; 93.859, Biomedical Research and 
Research Training, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: August 27, 2018.
David D. Clary,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2018-18904 Filed 8-30-18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>