alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
##### 



Exhibit 1.1
 (English translation)




---



##### 



(Ley
de Inversión Extranjera)
     2




---



##### 



3




---



##### 



(Ley General de Sociedades
Mercantiles).
     Ley General de Sociedades
Mercantiles),
 4




---



##### 



Ley General
de Sociedades Mercantiles),
 (Ley General de Sociedades Mercantiles), (Ley General de Sociedades Mercantiles)
 5




---



##### 



(Ley General de
Sociedades Mercantiles)
      6




---



##### 



(Ley del Mercado de Valores).
     7




---



##### 



(Ley del Mercado
de Valores).
          8




---



##### 



(Ley General de Sociedades Mercantiles), or limited voting power
shareholders referred in such Article 113,
 9




---



##### 



10




---



##### 



11




---



##### 



12




---



##### 



13




---



##### 



(Ley General de Sociedades Mercantiles)
     (Ley General de Sociedades Mercantiles),
    (Lev General de Sociedades
Mercantiles),
 (Ley General de Sociedades Mercantiles). (Ley General de Sociedades Mercantiles).
  14




---



##### 



(Iev General de
Sociedades Mercantiles). of (Lev General de Sociedades
Mercantiles) of
  (Ley General de Sociedades Mercantiles).
 (Ley General de Sociedades Mercantiles)
    15




---



##### 



(Ley General de Sociedades Mercantiles) Ley General de Sociedades Mercantiles
     (Ley General de Sociedades
Mercantiles), any (Ley General de Sociedades Mercantiles).
      16




---



##### 



(Lev General de Sociedades Mercantiles).
   17
#### In the Matter of Harry Panish, as Executor of Anna Moret, Deceased, Appellant.

Decree unanimously affirmed with costs for reasons stated in decision at Queens County Surrogate’s Court, Laurino, S. (Appeal from Decree of Queens County Surrogate’s Court, Laurino, S.—Judicial Settlement.) Present—Callahan, J. P., Denman, Green, Balio and Davis, JJ.
EXHIBIT 32




<PAGE>

     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Americann,  Inc. (the "Company")
on Form  10-Q  for the  period  ending  December  31,  2014 as  filed  with  the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"),  Timothy Keogh, the Company's
Principal   Executive  Officer  and  Benjamin  Barton  the  Company's  Principal
Financial and Accounting Officer,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, that to
the best of their knowledge:

     (1)  The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects the financial condition and results of the Company.


February 23, 2015                       /s/ Timothy Keogh
                                        -----------------------------------
                                        Timothy Keogh, Principal Executive
                                        Officer


February 23, 2015                       /s/ Banjamin J. Barton
                                        -----------------------------------
                                        Benjamin Barton, Principal Financial
                                        and Accounting Officer
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Gary W. Woodside, Jr., Appellant.

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Defendant was convicted of criminally negligent homicide for shooting Lawrence Trawick during the evening of November 4, 1987. On appeal defendant contends that the court erred in failing to instruct the jury that the prosecution had the burden of disproving his alibi defense and by making specific reference to defendant as an interested witness without making similar specific reference to other witnesses. Additionally, defendant contends that the prosecutor’s summation remarks deprived him of a fair trial.

*1053Defendant made no specific request for a jury instruction, did not except to the charge as given, and raised no objection during the prosecutor’s summation. As a result, the issues raised by defendant have not been preserved for appellate review *(see,*CPL 470.05 [2]; *People v Lipton,*54 NY2d 340, 351; *People v Dawson,*50 NY2d 311, 324). There is no basis for the exercise of our discretionary power of review. The court adequately informed the jury regarding the People’s burden of proof on the alibi defense *(see, People v Azzara,*138 AD2d 495, 496, *lv denied 71*NY2d 1023). The court also properly described defendant as an interested witness as a matter of law and set forth the factors the jury should consider in assessing whether other witnesses were interested in the outcome of the trial *(see,*1 CJI[NY] 7.03, at 269-270). Although the prosecutor impermissibly impugned the defense, the remarks were not part of a pervasive pattern of misconduct and were not so egregious as to deprive defendant of a fair trial *(see, People v Rosemond,*126 AD2d 962, *lv denied*69 NY2d 886; *People v Widger,*126 AD2d 962, *lv denied*69 NY2d 1011). Moreover, the court’s admonition to the prosecutor and its prompt curative instruction minimized or negated any prejudice to defendant *(see, People v Panepinto,*161 AD2d 1192, *lv denied*76 NY2d 862). (Appeal from Judgment of Jefferson County Court, Clary, J.—Criminally Negligent Homicide.) Present— Callahan, J. P., Doerr, Green, Balio and Lowery, JJ.
----

----

I Teave

Komisjon

----

Euroopa Keskpanga poolt peamistel refinantseerimistoimingutel rakendatav intressimäär: (1)

2,09 % 1. jaanuar 2005

Euro vahetuskursid (2)

4. jaanuar 2005

(2005/C 2/01)

1 euro= 

----

(1)  Kurss kohaldatud viimastele tomingutele, mis on sooritatud enne osutatud kuupäeva. Muutuva intressimääraga pakkumismenetluse puhul on tegemist marginaalse intressimääraga.

(2)

Allikas: EKP avaldatud viitekurss.

----

III Teatised

Komisjon

----

Konkursikutse energeetika valdkonnas läbi viidavate tegevuste korraldamiseks programmi “Intelligent Energy – Europe” raames (Euroopa Nõukogu ja Parlamendi 26.6.2003 otsus 1230/2003/EÜ, ELT L 176, 15.7.2003).

(2005/C 2/02)

Käesolevaga esitab Euroopa Komisjon konkursikutse ettepanekute esitamiseks 2004. aasta valikumenetluseks “Intelligent Energy – Europe” programmi raames. Ettepanekute esitamise viimane tähtaeg tüüp 1 ja tüüp 2 tegevuste puhul on 23. märts 2005 ning tüüp 3 tegevuste puhul 31. jaanuar 2005 ja 31. mai 2005.

Teave konkursikutse eeskirjade kohta ja juhised projektide esitamiseks on kättesaadavad veebilehel:

http://europa.eu.int/comm/energy/intelligent/index_en.html

“Intelligent Energy – Europe” programmi kasutajatoe poole võib pöörduda e-posti aadressil TREN-Intelligentenergy@cec.eu.int.

----
<PAGE>

                                                               Exhibit 10.23.1

                         BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE
                             AMENDMENT NO. 1

This Amendment No. 1 is effective as of the date this Amendment is executed,
and amends the Agreement to Issue Shares of Common Stock (thereto, the
"Agreement"), dated as of February 16, 1999, between MedicaLogic/Medscape,
Inc. ("Medscape") and Baylor College of Medicine ("BCM").

     The parties agree as follows:

     1.    Except as specifically provided in this Amendment No. 1, all other
           terms of the Agreement remain in effect.

     2.    Amend Section 3.1 as follows:

           Medscape will issue Shares to BCM according to the following
           formula:

           N=R DIVIDED BY P

           -  N = the number of Shares to be issued by Medscape to BCM
           -  R = 25% percent of the license fees received by Medscape from
              the sale of licenses for the Software to BCM from the date of this
              Amendment through December 31, 2004 other than pursuant to the
              Purchase Order.
           -  P = the fair market value of Medscape's Common Stock

     3.    Amend Section 4.0 to extend the term of the Agreement through
           12/31/2004.

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Amendment No. 1
     effective as of 12/27, 2000.

                                       MedicaLogic/Medscape, Inc.
                                       20500 NW Evergreen Parkway
                                       Hillsboro, OR 97124

                                       By: /s/ David C. Moffenbeier
                                          --------------------------------
                                          David C. Moffenbeier

                                       Title:    CEO
                                             -----------------------------


                                       Baylor College of Medicine
                                       One Baylor Plaza
                                       Houston, TX 77030

                                       By: /s/ Ralph D. Feigin
         [SEAL]                           --------------------------------
                                          Ralph D. Feigin, M.D.

                                       Title:
                                             -----------------------------
4

DIAI 1401.001

E1. Civilian Mobility Agreement

DEFENSE INTELLIGENCE AGENCY

Civilian Mobility Agreement

1. Position Title:

 (job series) (office symbol)

2. Employee Agreement:

I, , accept assignment to the position identified in paragraph 1. I 

understand that this position is subject to the DIA Civilian Mobility Program (CMP) and affirm that I 

have been provided and have reviewed DIAI 1401.001 “Civilian Mobility Program.”

Further, I understand that if I refuse to accept a geographic relocation while serving under this 

Agreement, to include unaccompanied tours as directed by the Director, DIA or his designee, my 

employment with DIA may be terminated.

I understand that temporary release form this Civilian Mobility Agreement for extreme personal, 

family, or financial hardship; documented medical condition; or in the best interest of DIA, is subject to 

the approval by the Director, DIA or his designee. I understand and agree that the discretion of the 

Director, DIA or his designee, is final and not subject to grievance or appeal.

I understand that geographic relocation for career development will require no more than two 

permanent relocations between initial employment and the completion of training necessary for the 

placement at the full performance level in my career field.

I understand that the duration of any geographic relocation is set by established DIA internal 

policies and subject to change based upon the mission needs of the Agency. Temporary duty may be 

required during any tour of duty under the CMP. I understand that DIA management will consider, but is 

not obligated to fulfill, my geographic preferences for relocation while serving under this Agreement.

3. Certification:

I hereby certify that I have read, fully understand, acknowledge and execute this Agreement as a 

Condition of Employment with DIA.

(SIGNATURE) (DATE)
ex101.htm


Exhibit 10.1







NEWFIELD EXPLORATION COMPANY


2010 EMPLOYEE STOCK PURCHASE PLAN







Amendment No. 1







This Amendment No. 1 (this “Amendment”) to the Newfield Exploration Company 2010 Employee Stock Purchase Plan (the “Plan”) is made by the Compensation & Management Development Committee (the “Committee”) of the Board of Directors of Newfield Exploration Company (the “Company”), as follows:


 


WHEREAS, the Company sponsors the Plan for the benefit of its eligible employees;


 


WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 10.2 of the Plan, the Committee may amend the Plan at any time; and


 


WHEREAS, the Committee desires to amend the Plan to increase the maximum number of shares a participant may purchase during an offering period.


 


NOW, THEREFORE, pursuant to the Plan, the Committee hereby amends the Plan as follows:


 


1. Share Limitation.  The last sentence of Section 4.4 of the Plan shall be deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following:


 


“Notwithstanding any other provision of the Plan, unless the Administrative Committee, with the advance approval of the Compensation & Management Development Committee, determines otherwise with respect to an Offering the maximum number of shares of Common Stock that that a Participant shall be permitted to purchase during an Offering Period is 1,000 shares.”


 


2.           Effect on Plan.  Except as otherwise set forth in this Amendment No. 1, the Plan shall remain in full force and effect.


 


3.           Effective Date of this Amendment.  This Amendment shall become effective as of February 5, 2014.


 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Committee, by its duly authorized member, has executed this  Amendment No. 1 on this 5th day of February, 2014.


 







COMPENSATION & MANAGEMENT DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE:












By:           /s/ John R. Kemp, III 


John R. Kemp III


Chair of the Committee
An official website of the United States government                

----

end of header

Census.govNewsroom

# Newsroom Archive

Skip left menu navigation                          - About the Newsroom
                          - Facts for Features
                          - **News Releases**
                          - Press Kits
                          - Tip Sheets

## Anthony Caruso

### Project Manager, Company Statistics DivisionU.S. Census Bureau

Anthony Caruso is a statistician and project manager for the Survey of Business Owners program at the U.S. Census Bureau.  Before joining the Census Bureau several years ago, he taught high school mathematics in Manassas, Virginia.  Mr. Caruso holds a Bachelor's degree in secondary mathematics education from Lock Haven University of Pennsylvania and a graduate certificate in project management from The George Washington University.  

CONNECT WITH US**********

                            - Information Quality
                            - Data Linkage Infrastructure
                            - Data Protection and Privacy Policy
                            - Accessibility
                            - FOIA
                            - Inspector General
                            - No FEAR Act
                            - U.S. Department of Commerce
                            - USA.gov

----

Measuring America's People, Places, and Economy

Is this page helpful?
YesNo

NO THANKS

255 characters maximum255 characters maximum reached

Thank you for your feedback.Comments or suggestions? 

PIO@census.gov
I

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 4157

To transfer the lands administered by the Bureau of Land Management

to the State in which the lands are located.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 24, 1994

Mr. THOMAS of Wyoming (for himself, Mr. HANSEN, Mr. SKEEN, Mr. ALLARD, Mr. BOEHNER, Mr. CALVERT, Mr. CUNNINGHAM, Mr. DELAY, Mr.

DOOLITTLE, Mr. DUNCAN, Mr. EMERSON, Mr. GALLEGLY, Mr. HEFLEY,

Mr. KOLBE, Mr. LEWIS of California, Mr. LIVINGSTON, Mr. MCCANDLESS, Mr. MCINNIS, Mr. POMBO, Mr. ROBERTS, Mr. SCHAEFER, Mr.

SMITH of Oregon, Mr. STUMP, Mr. TAYLOR of North Carolina, Mrs.

VUCANOVICH, and Mr. YOUNG of Alaska) introduced the following bill;

which was referred to the Committee on Natural Resources

A BILL

To transfer the lands administered by the Bureau of Land

Management to the State in which the lands are located.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. TRANSFER OF BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT

4 LANDS.

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subject to valid existing rights

6 and except as otherwise provided in this section, the Sec7 retary of the Interior shall offer to transfer in accordance
2

•HR 4157 IH

1 with this section all right, title, and interest (including the

2 surface and subsurface estates), as well as related water

3 rights, of the United States in and to all lands adminis4 tered by the Bureau of Land Management to the State

5 in which such lands are located. A State may only accept

6 the total offer of all such lands or reject such offer. Any

7 transfer under this section shall be effective on September

8 30, 1998.

9 (b) VALID LEASES AND MINING CLAIMS.—Each

10 State receiving lands under subsection (a) shall honor

11 valid existing leases, permits, and mining claims on such

12 lands for the term of such lease or permit, or until such

13 mining claims are patented or otherwise extinguished.

14 (c) RESTRICTIVE COVENANT.—Lands transferred

15 under this section that are not encumbered by a lease or

16 permit may only be used for public purposes. Such lands

17 shall revert to the United States if a State does not use

18 them for public purposes.

19 (d) EXEMPTED LANDS.—Lands administered by the

20 Bureau of Land Management are exempt from transfer

21 under this Act if such lands are—

22 (1) wilderness;

23 (2) wilderness study areas;

24 (3) areas of critical environmental concern; or
3

•HR 4157 IH

1 (4) determined by the Secretary to be too costly

2 for the United States to decontaminate.

Æ
**EXHIBIT 8.2**

 

**June25, 2010**

 

**Securitiesand Exchange Commission**

**100 FStreet, N.E.**

**Washington,DC 20549**

 

**Commissioners:**

 

**We haveread the statements made by Embotelladora Andina S.A. (copy attached), which weunderstand will be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, pursuantto Item 16F of Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2009, dated June 29,2010.**

 

**Weagree with the statements concerning our Firm pursuant to Item 16F.**

 

**Verytruly yours,**

 

 

**/s/PricewaterhouseCoopers**

 

----
1

28 Dec 2007

MARRIED TO A FOREIGN NATIONAL

THE CANDIDATE MUST BRING THIS INFORMATION TO THE SECURITY 

INTERVIEW. PROMISES TO PROVIDE THIS INFORMATION IN THE 

FUTURE IS NOT ACCEPTABLE

The Candidate must complete a SF 86 for himself with no omissions or time gaps. If 

there is a divorce or divorces, they must be all listed on the SF 86. The Candidate must 

bring to the security interview a copy of the final divorce decree for each divorce.

A dated and signed SF 86 completed by the Candidate's spouse from the date of the 

spouse's date of birth to present. The SF 86 can not have any omissions or time gaps. 

The Candidate must bring the spouse's SF 86 to the security interview. 

The spouse must list in their SF 86 all first degree relatives (immediate family members) 

to include their full name, relationship to the spouse, their date of birth, place of birth, 

residential address, occupation and identity/address of their employer. The same 

information is required for any friends or second degree relatives (aunts, uncles, 

nephews, etc) who are employed by a foreign government. If a first degree relative is 

deceased, they still have to be listed in the foreign national's SF 86 along with that 

relative's date/place of birth; relationship to the spouse, and the deceased's date/location 

of death.

A copy of the spouse's birth certificate (or other evidence of current citizenship) together 

with a CERTIFIED English translation of the document must be brought to the interview. 

At this time, a photocopy of the certified document is unacceptable. You have to be able 

to feel the seal on the certifying document.

A dated and signed statement from the spouse addressed "To Whom It May Concern" in 

which the spouse states their intention towards future U.S. citizenship.

A dated and signed letter from the Candidate addressed "To Whom It May Concern" in 

which the following is addressed:

Detailed circumstances in which the Candidate met their spouse. Inclusive 

periods of association and nature of that association prior to the decision to marry.

List of spouse's relatives whom the Candidate has met; the frequency/nature of 

those contacts.

A statement of the Candidate's feelings of affection/obligation to members of the 

spouse's immediate family.
2

MARRIED TO A FOREIGN NATIONAL (CONTINUED)

Whether the spouse or members of the spouse's immediate family are involved in any 

kind of political activity in their native land and a description of that activity and political 

affiliation. If they are not politically active, the Candidate should say so in the letter.

Whether the spouse of any of the spouse's relatives have shown any kind of interest in or 

have questioned the Candidate about their job/duties with the DIA or about any classified 

information to which the Candidate may have access.

Acknowledgement by the Candidate that marriage to a foreign national may 

adversely affect their assignment and/or their security clearance and access.
* The Honorable Howard F. Sachs, Senior United States District Judge for the

Western District of Missouri.



## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 01-2073

___________ United States of America, * * Appellee, * Appeal from the United States

* District Court for the Western v. * District of Missouri. * Tyree L. West, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellant. *

___________ Submitted: September 13, 2001 Filed: September 20, 2001

___________ Before WOLLMAN, Chief Judge, RICHARD S. ARNOLD and FAGG, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Tyree L. West was arrested for possessing a firearm (firearm I) after a felony convic tion. West was released pending further investigation, then indicted and rearrested. West possessed another firearm (firearm II) at the time of his second arrest. Having waived his right to a jury trial, West was convicted by the district court * for possessing firearm I. West now appeals, arguing the court impermissibly admitted-2-

evidence of firearm II in violation of Federal Rule of Evidence 404(b). We disagree. Inour view, the district court did not admit the disputed evidence. Stating it would rule on West’s continuing Rule 404(b) objection after the case was submitted, the district court provisionally received the government’s offer of proof of West’s possession of firearm II. The district court then sustained the objection when the government attemptedto cross examine West about this firearm. Additionally, the district court neither mentioned nor considered the government’s evidence about firearm II in its findings of West’s guilt. We thus affirm West’s conviction. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
A true copy. Attest: CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATIONS

I, Elwood G. Norris, certify that:



|1. | I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K/A of American Technology Corporation;
|-- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: March 24, 2006



|                                                                        
|------------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ ELWOOD G. NORRIS                                                    
|Elwood G. Norris, Chairman of the Board (Co-Principal
Executive Officer)