alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EX-10.11



 IMAX CORPORATION 

EXHIBIT 10.11 

AMENDING AGREEMENT No.2 
 This
Amendment to Services Agreement dated as of (the “Amending Agreement”) is made between:  
 IMAX CORPORATION, a corporation
incorporated under the laws of Canada (hereinafter referred to as the “Company”), 
 and 

BRAD WECHSLER (the “Executive”) 
 WHEREAS,
the Company wishes to enter into this Amending Agreement No. 2 to amend and extend the Services Agreement dated as of December 11, 2008 , as amended by Amending Agreement dated February 14, 2011, (collectively the
“Agreement”). 
 NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and of the mutual covenants and agreements herein contained, the parties
hereto agree as follows: 
  

	1.	The following will be added as the final “Whereas clause” on page 1 of the Agreement: 


“WHEREAS the Board and the Chairman each recognize and acknowledge their fiduciary duties to the Company.” 

 

	2.	Section 1 of the Agreement shall be deleted and replaced with the following: 

 1. Term.
The term of the Agreement shall begin on the Effective Date and continue until such time as the Board determines to terminate the services of the Chairman. Any such termination shall be communicated to Chairman with ninety (90) days written
notice, unless termination is made for Cause, as that term is defined in the Employment Agreement, in which case no notice shall be required. Unless the Chairman’s services are terminated as aforesaid, the Board agrees continue to nominate him
for re-election to the Board and to make all reasonable efforts to solicit shareholder approval of his re-election to the Board. 
  

	3.	Section 3 of the Agreement shall be deleted and replaced with the following: 

 3.
Compensation and Benefits. During the Term, Chairman shall receive a cash stipend of $230,000 for each year served as Chairman of the Board, payable in equal parts fifteen (15) days after the end of each calendar quarter (the “Fee”).
The Company shall also reimburse Chairman for all reasonable out-of-pocket expenses in the performance of his obligations under this Agreement for which documentation reasonably satisfactory to IMAX is provided, including expenses relating to
Chairman’s travel and performance of duties outside of his office in New York. The Company shall additionally provide Chairman with reimbursement of all reasonable automobile expenses, office space in the Company’s New York office and an
assistant throughout the Term. 








	4.	General. Except as amended herein, all other terms of the Agreement shall remain in full force and unamended. 


DATED as of April 1, 2013 

AGREED AND ACCEPTED: 
  

	
	
	/s/ Bradley J. Wechsler
	Bradley J. Wechsler
	
	IMAX CORPORATION
	
	/s/ Robert D. Lister
	 Robert D. Lister
  

Chief Legal Officer
 Chief Business Development
Officer

	
	/s/ Joseph Sparacio
	 Joseph Sparacio
  

Executive Vice President and
 Chief Financial
Officer
Exhibit
13.2



Certification
of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to

Title
18, United States Code, Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to

Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



I,
James Vandeberg, Chief Financial Officer of Reg Technologies Inc., certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that, to the best of my knowledge:



|1. | The
    Annual Report on Form 20-F of Reg Technologies Inc. for the year ended April 30, 2015 (the “Report”) fully complies
    with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and
|-- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                         
|2. | The
    information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
    of Reg Technologies Inc.                                                                                   



|Date:
    September 1, 2015 | /s/
    “James Vandeberg”    
|--------------------------- | -----------------------------
|                            | James Vandeberg              
|                            | (Chief Financial
    Officer)



A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Reg Technologies Inc. and will be retained
by Reg Technologies Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
# DIA releases updated report on Russia’s use of lethal Iranian unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) in Ukraine; UAV display to continue

/ Published Aug. 25, 2023
JOINT BASE ANACOSTIA-BOLLING , “Iranian UAVs in Ukraine: A Visual Comparison.”dia-pao@dodiis.mil*DIA’s mission is to provide intelligence on foreign militaries to prevent and decisively win wars.**DIA officers are united in a common vision — to be the indispensable source of defense intelligence expertise for the nation. For 60**years, DIA has met the full range of security challenges faced by the United States. DIA intelligence officers operate around the world, supporting customers from forward-deployed warfighters to national policymakers.*Military Power Publications and Threat Reports page here.or by clicking here
I

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 3996

To suspend for the period January 1, 1994, to April 30, 1994, the duty

on frozen onions.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 10, 1994

Mr. CRANE introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee

on Ways and Means

A BILL

To suspend for the period January 1, 1994, to April 30,

1994, the duty on frozen onions.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. TEMPORARY DUTY SUSPENSION ON FROZEN

4 ONIONS.

5 Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized Tar6 iff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting

7 in numerical sequence the following new heading:

‘‘ 9902.07.11 Onions, frozen

(provided for in

subheading

0710.80.97) ........... Free No change No change On or before

4/30/94 ’’.
2

•HR 3996 IH

1 SEC. 2. EFFECTIVE DATE.

2 (a) IN GENERAL.—The amendment made by section

3 1 applies with respect to goods entered, or withdrawn from

4 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after

5 the date of the enactment of this Act.

6 (b) RELIQUIDATION.—Notwithstanding section 514

7 of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1514) or any other

8 provision of law, upon proper request filed with the appro9 priate customs officer on or before the date which is 90

10 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, any entry,

11 or withdrawal from warehouse for consumption, that was

12 made—

13 (1) after December 31, 1993, and before the

14 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act,

15 and

16 (2) with respect to which there would have been

17 no duty if the amendment made by section 1 applied

18 to such entry or withdrawal,

19 shall be liquidated or reliquidated as though such amend20 ment applied to such entry or withdrawal.

Æ
EXHIBIT 12.1


                                DENAMERICA CORP.
                        RATIO OF INCOME TO FIXED CHARGES
                                  (000 OMITTED)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                         FISCAL YEAR
                                     -------------------------------------------------------
                                      1995       1996       1997         1998         1999
                                     ------    -------    --------     --------     --------
<S>                                  <C>       <C>        <C>          <C>          <C>
Income (Loss) Before Income Taxes
    and Extraordinary Item ......    $  505    $ 2,485    $(17,719)    $ (6,942)    $(28,748)
Fixed Charges:
    Rental Expense ..............     2,499      7,660      10,132        9,094        8,825
    Interest ....................     2,467      9,255      11,962       11,070       11,528
    Debt Expense Amortization ...       144        350       1,939        1,722        2,061
                                     ------    -------    --------     --------     --------
       Total Fixed Charges ......     5,110     17,265      24,023       21,886       22,414
                                     ------    -------    --------     --------     --------
Net Income as Adjusted ..........    $5,615    $19,750    $  6,314     $ 14,944     $ (6,334)
                                     ======    =======    ========     ========     ========
Ratio ...........................      1.10       1.14
                                     ======    =======
Amount Inadequate to Cover
    Fixed Charges ...............                         $ 17,719     $  6,942     $ 28,748
                                                          ========     ========     ========
</TABLE>
Exhibit 10.10

**SHORT TERM ADVANCE**

  

| **$175,000****** |   | **October 15, 2002****** |
|------------------|--------|--------------------------|

**FOR VALUE RECEIVED**, the undersigned, MediaBin, Inc., a Georgia corporation (the “Borrower”), promises to pay to Venturos AS, a Norwegian corporation (the“Lender”), at P.O. Box 113, 4552 Farsund, Norway (or at such other place as the Lender may designate in writing to the Borrower), in lawful money of the United States of America, the principal sum of one hundred seventy-five thousanddollars ($175,000), without interest, as hereinafter provided.

The indebtedness evidenced by this Advance shall be due and payable on January 1, 2003, ashereinabove provided.

To secure all of its obligations hereunder the Company hereby grants to the Lender a security interest in all of the Accounts Receivableof the Company (as evidenced by invoices sent to customers), whether now existing or subsequently acquired (the “Collateral”). The Company, at its own expense, will promptly execute anddeliver or file all financing statements and similar documents and take such further actions that the Lender may reasonably request from time to time in order to perfect and/or maintain the security interest hereby granted. The Lenders are entitledto all of the rights and remedies of a secured party under the Uniform Commercial Code as in force in the State of Georgia, which rights and remedies will be cumulative and not exclusive of any other rights and remedies. 

The Company hereby agrees (i) the Company shall not knowingly and of its own volition create, incur, assume, or suffer to exist any encumbrance of any kind on the Collateralwithout the express written consent of the Lender, and (ii) the security interest in the Collateral granted to the Lender pursuant to this Advance shall rank senior in priority to any security interest in the Collateral hereafter granted orexisting.

The Borrower hereby waives presentment for payment, demand, notice of non-payment or dishonor, protest and notice of protest, or any other notice ofany kind with respect thereto.

Time is of the essence of this Advance.

This Advance shall be deemed to be made pursuant to the laws of the State of Georgia.

**IN WITNESS WHEREOF**, the duly authorized officers of theBorrower have executed, sealed, and delivered this Advance, as of the day and year first above written.

 

|   | MEDIABIN, INC. |                                                        |   |
|--------|----------------|-------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|   | By:       | */s/ DAVID MORAN*                                      |   | Attest: |   */s/ HAINES HARGRETT*  |
|   |           |                                                             |   |   |  |
|   |           | **David P. Moran****President and Chief Executive Officer** |   |   |   **Haines H. Hargrett**  **Secretary** |
#### Anne M. Harris et al., Individually and as Parents and Natural Guardians of Margaret Harris, an Infant, Respondents, v Robert Kasperak, Appellant.

Order unanimously reversed on the law without costs, motion granted and complaint dismissed. Memorandum: In this action commenced by plaintiffs to recover for personal injuries sustained by the infant plaintiff when defendant’s Irish Setter dog allegedly bit her about her face, defendant moved for summary judgment dismissing the complaint. Supreme Court denied his motion. We reverse.

An owner of a domestic animal is not liable for injuries caused by the animal unless he knows or should have known of its vicious propensities *(see, Muller v McKesson,*73 NY 195; *DeVaul v Carvigo Inc.,*138 AD2d 669, *appeal dismissed*72 NY2d 914, *lv denied*72 NY2d 806; *Russell v Lepre,*99 AD2d 489; *Wheaton v Guthrie,*89 AD2d 809, 810; *O’Connor v Larson,*74 AD2d 734, 735). Defendant demonstrated his entitlement to judgment in his favor as a matter of law *(see,*CPLR 3212 [b]; *Zuckerman v City of New York,*49 NY2d 557, 562) by the submission of evidentiary proof in admissible form that his dog did not possess vicious propensities.

In response, plaintiffs failed to tender evidentiary proof in admissible form to show the existence of triable issues of fact. In opposing defendant’s motion, plaintiffs submitted their *1063deposition testimony in which they essentially concurred with defendant’s assessment that the dog was friendly and not vicious. Although plaintiff Brian Harris averred that several neighbors told him that they would "sign sworn statements” to the effect that the dog was "wild”, "uncontrollable” and "dangerous”, those conclusory assertions are without evidentiary value and thus unavailing *(see, Zuckerman v City of New York, supra).*Plaintiffs failed either to proffer those affidavits in opposition to defendant’s motion or to provide an acceptable excuse for their failure to do so. Moreover, that evidence would not, without more, raise an issue of fact with respect to defendant’s knowledge that his dog "habitually tended to do acts which might endanger persons” *(Fontecchio v Esposito,*108 AD2d 780, 781). (Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Erie County, Flaherty, J.—Summary Judgment.) Present— Denman, J. P., Boomer, Pine, Lawton and Davis, JJ.
**
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION OF CO-CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

**PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)**

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2020 (the“Report”) of Solar Senior Capital Ltd. (the “Registrant”), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, MICHAEL S. GROSS, the Co-Chief Executive Officer ofthe Registrant, hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge, that: 

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements ofSection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and 

(2) The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant. 

 
 /S/ MICHAEL S. GROSS**Name:** **Michael S. Gross****Date:** **August 4, 2020****
Order entered December 6 , 2021

In The 

### Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
No. 05
- 21
- 00967
- CV IN THE INTEREST OF T.S., ET AL., CHILD REN On Appeal from the 305th Judicial District Cou rt

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. JC
- 19
- 818
- X

O RDER The reporter’s record in this accelerated appeal from a parental termination case is overdue. Accordingly, we ORDER Pamela Sumler, Official Court Reporter for the 305 th Judicial D istrict Co urt, to file the record no later than December 1 6 , 2021. As the reporter’s record was first due November 15, 2021, extensions will not be granted absent exigent circumstances and t he trial court must arrange for a substitute reporter if necessary to ensur e the timely filing of the record

. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 28.4(b)(1).We DIRECT the Clerk of the Court to send a copy of this order to the

Honorable Cheryl Lee Shannon, Presiding Judge of the 305th Judicial District Court ; Ms. Sumler; and, the parties. /s / KEN MOLBERG JUSTICE
4824-2042-8134.1

Sean M. Higgins

24 Greenway Plaza, Suite 1400

Houston, Texas 77046

Sean.Higgins@lewisbrisbois.com

Direct: 832.460.4630

May 21, 2018 File No. 34273.22

ARIZONA • CALIFORNIA • COLORADO • CONNECTICUT • FLORIDA • GEORGIA • ILLINOIS • INDIANA • KANSAS • KENTUCKY

LOUISIANA • MARYLAND • MASSACHUSETTS • MISSOURI • NEVADA • NEW JERSEY • NEW MEXICO • NEW YORK

NORTH CAROLINA • OHIO • OREGON • PENNSYLVANIA • RHODE ISLAND • TEXAS • WASHINGTON • WEST VIRGINIA

VIA E-FILE 

Keith E. Hottle 

Clerk of the Court 

Fourth Court of Appeals 

300 Dolorosa, Suite 3200 

San Antonio, Texas 78205-3037 

Re: Court of Appeals No.: 04-18-00103-CV; Westwind Homes d/b/a Westwind 

Development, G.P. – Laredo, LLC vs Fernando Ramirez and Minerva Ramirez in 

the 4th Court of Appeals District, San Antonio 

Dear Mr. Hottle: 

Appellant Westwind Homes d/b/a Westwind Development, G.P. – Laredo, LLC writes to 

inform the Court that the parties have agreed to mediate this case before Louis P. Selig on June 

13, 2018. Mr. Selig’s address is: The Caroline Center for Dispute Resolution, 5009 Caroline 

Street, Ste. 100, Houston, Texas 77004-5750. 

Very truly yours, 

/s/ Sean M Higgins 

Sean M. Higgins of 

LEWIS BRISBOIS BISGAARD & SMITH LLP

SMH 

ACCEPTED

04-18-00103-CV

FOURTH COURT OF APPEALS

SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS

5/21/2018 11:04 AM

 FILED IN 4th COURT OF APPEALS SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS 5/21/2018 11:04:00 AM KEITH E. HOTTLE CLERK
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 20-7808

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

DEAN ASHTON BELCHER, a/k/a Deano,

 Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at 

Norfolk. Rebecca Beach Smith, Senior District Judge. (2:18-cr-00191-RBS-RJK-2;

2:20-cv-00438-RBS)

Submitted: May 20, 2021 Decided: May 25, 2021

Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Dean Ashton Belcher, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Dean Ashton Belcher seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his

28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge 

issues a certificate of appealability. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B). A certificate of 

appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional 

right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a 

prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists could find the 

district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims debatable or wrong. See Buck v. 

Davis, 137 S. Ct. 759, 773-74 (2017). When the district court denies relief on procedural 

grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is 

debatable and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. 

Gonzalez v. Thaler, 565 U.S. 134, 140-41 (2012) (citing Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473,

484 (2000)). 

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Belcher has not made 

the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the 

appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process. 

DISMISSED
Lucas Energy, Inc. 8-K 




Exhibit 10.2


		450
Gears Rd,

Houston, TX 77067

Phone: (713) 528-1881

Fax: (713) 337-1510


 


 


February 2, 2016


 


 


	Mr. John Chambers, Principal	VIA EMAIL AT:
	Silver Star Oil Company	JCHAMBERS@SILVERSTAROIL.COM
	3631 Fairmount Street, Ste. 101 Dallas Texas 75219	 
	Phone: (214) 305 2655	 


 


 


		Re:	LUCAS
ENERGY, INC. (“Lucas”); NON-REVOLVING
LINE OF CREDIT AGREEMENT,

Entered into on August 30, 2015, and the associated Convertible Notes



 


 


Dear Mr. Chambers:


 


I am writing to provide
Silver Star Energy Company (“Silver Star”) the required thirty days’ written notice of Lucas’
intent to prepay those certain four (4) outstanding Convertible Promissory Notes each in the amount of $200,000, dated September
28, 2015, October 23, 2015 to be effective October 21, 2015, November 25, 2015 to be effective on November 23, 2015, and January
4, 2016 to be effective on December 31, 2015 (collectively, the “Notes”), pursuant to Section 5(a)
of such Notes.


 


Additionally,
Silver Star has not yet paid Lucas the $200,000 owed for January 2016, which is required to be paid by Silver Star by February
1, 2016, pursuant to the terms of that certain Non-Revolving
Line of Credit Agreement dated August 30, 2016. Lucas formally makes written demand for the immediate payment of such $200,000
tranche.


 


Lucas is inclined to take
no further action at this time, while reserving our right to do so, in exchange for your agreement to amend our agreement(s) as
follows:


 


		1.	Silver Star waives its right to consent(s) under the following sections
in the Line of Credit: Section 1.1h, Section 7.9, Section 7.10, and Section 7.11,



 


		2.	Silver Star agrees to issue to Lucas the balance ($1.4 to $1.6 million)
of the Line of Credit by February 19, 2016, or if said payment not made, forego the thirty notice period in each outstanding note,
by replacing the existing language of Section 5(a) of each note and replace it with the following language: “a. This Note
may be prepaid in whole or in part at any time without penalty.”
	 	 	 





    	 



    	 



    

 


		450
Gears Rd,

Houston, TX 77067

Phone: (713) 528-1881

Fax: (713) 337-1510





 


 


Finally,
we have been advised that a company seeking to raise capital may suffer significant adverse consequences from engaging an unlicensed
intermediary. Therefore, we advise you to refrain from contacting third parties regarding making direct investments in Lucas. Obviously,
Silver Star is free to seek whatever business and financial arrangements it may choose. This is a serious issue and “finders”
and unregistered broker-dealers
have been subject to permanent injunctions and penalties for failing to register and then selling securities.


 


 


John, I would hope
you are agreeable to the above as we advance the company for the benefit of all parties.


 


Kind Regards,


 


 


LUCAS ENERGY,INC.


	By:  	
	Anthony C. Schnur

Chief Executive Officer


 


 


Agreed (Outlined as Item 1 & 2 Above):


SILVER STAR OIL COMPANY
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Christopher Jamison, Appellant.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Rotker, J.), rendered September 13, 1989, convicting him of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

We have reviewed the record and agree with the defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted *(see, Anders v California,*386 US 738; *People v Paige,*54 AD2d 631; *cf., People v Gonzalez,*47 NY2d 606). Thompson, J. P., Kunzeman, Eiber, Rosenblatt and Ritter, JJ., concur.