alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31

Certification

I, Michael J. Ulrich, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of SandRidge Mississippian Trust I, for which The Bank of New York Mellon Trust
Company, N.A., acts as Trustee;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all
material respects the financial condition of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. I am
responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) or for causing such controls and procedures to be established and maintained, for the registrant and I have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be
designed under my supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to me by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report my conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred
during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over
financial reporting; and

5. I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation, to the registrants auditors:

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over
financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves any persons who have a significant role in the registrants
internal control over financial reporting.

In giving the foregoing certifications in paragraphs 4 and 5, I have relied to the extent I
consider reasonable on information provided to me by SandRidge Energy, Inc.



/s/ Michael J. UlrichMichael J. Ulrich
Vice President The Bank of New York Mellon Trust
Company, N.A.


Date: November 14, 2011
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLAImages

# DLA Images

Search

Search

                                  - All Images 
                                  - Other 

                                  - Upload Date
                                  - Photo Date
                                  - Title

Share

----

Download Image: Small ()Medium ()Full Size (0.14 MB)

Tags:Defense Logistics Agency Energy, DLA Energy Middle East, DLA Energy , Retirement

Photo by:VIRIN: 

Photo Gallery
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3917 Reported in House (RH)]

                                                Private Calendar No. 15
103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 3917

                          [Report No. 103-837]

                For the relief of Arthur A. Carron, Jr.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 24, 1994

  Mr. Stupak introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

                            October 5, 1994

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House and ordered to be printed

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
                For the relief of Arthur A. Carron, Jr.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. WAIVER OF TIME LIMITATIONS.

    The time limitations set forth in section 3702(b) of title 31, 
United States Code, shall not apply with respect to a claim by Arthur 
A. Carron, Jr., of Bark River, Michigan, for amounts due to him by the 
Department of the Navy. The amounts due are represented by the 
following checks that were received but not negotiated by Arthur A. 
Carron, Jr.:
            (1) Treasury check number 2,831,843, dated October 18, 
        1966, in the amount of $10,850.74 for salary and expenses.
            (2) Treasury check number 10,445,856, dated January 29, 
        1971, in the amount of $1,361.00 for salary and expenses.
            (3) Treasury check number 71,681,041, dated April 1, 1971, 
        in the amount of $562.25 for retirement pay.

SEC. 2. DEADLINE.

    Section 1 shall apply only if Arthur A. Carron, Jr., or his 
authorized representative, submits a claim pursuant to such section 
before the expiration of the 3-month period beginning on the date of 
the enactment of this Act.
                                     

                                                Private Calendar No. 15

103d CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 3917

                          [Report No. 103-837]

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

                For the relief of Arthur A. Carron, Jr.

_______________________________________________________________________

                            October 5, 1994

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House and ordered to be printed
```
EXHIBIT 32





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350





In connection with the quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Formative Growth Corporation (the “Company”) for the quarter ended December 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Joseph Rozelle, President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge that:





1.
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








Date: February 8, 2011





/s/ Joseph RozelleJoseph Rozelle

President

(Principal Executive and Financial Officer)











The foregoing certification is being furnished as an exhibit to the Report pursuant to Item 601(b)(32) of Regulation S-K and  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code) and, accordingly, is not being filed as part of the Report for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not incorporated by reference into any filings of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.
<PAGE>   1





                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1





                   CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS


         As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the
incorporation of our report dated January 31, 1997 included in this Form 10-K,
into the Company's previously filed Registration Statement on Form S-8 (No.
33-94256) of the Rock Bottom Restaurants, Inc. Non-Employee Directors' Stock
Option Plan dated June 3, 1994 and Rock Bottom Restaurants, Inc. Equity
Incentive Plan dated June 3, 1994.

                                        /s/ ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP



Denver, Colorado,
   March 25, 1997.
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS




         We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements  on  Form  S-8  (Nos.  333-38561,  333-25435,  333-49081,  333-53079,
333-59905,  333-61085,  333-06385, 333-01046, 33-83832, 333-44046, 333-58066 and
333-84827) of Spectrian  Corporation of our reports dated April 17, 2001, except
for Note 14 which is as of May 23, 2001,  relating to the financial  statements,
which appear in this Form 10-K.



/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

San Jose, California
June 1, 2001






                                       S-1
EXHIBIT 32.1
   
 
 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
 PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
   In connection with the accompanying quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Health in Harmony Inc. for the quarter ended April 30, 2011, I certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to my knowledge, that:
  (1) the quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Health in Harmony Inc. for the quarter ended April 30, 2011 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
  (2) the information contained in the quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended April 30, 2011, fairly presents in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Health in Harmony Inc..
   /s/ Tammy DuPerron
 By: Tammy DuPerron
 Title: President and Chief Executive Officer
   Date: May 16, 2011
#### Gerrieann Bramble et al., Respondents, v Sears, Roebuck & Co., Appellant.

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries and damage to personal property, etc., the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Held, J.), dated October 13, 1989, which denied its motion for summary judgment.

Ordered that the order is reversed, with costs, and the matter is remitted to the Supreme Court, Kings County, for a new determination in accordance herewith; and it is further,

Ordered that the plaintiffs, within 30 days after service upon them of a copy of this decision and order, with notice of entry, shall serve upon the defendant and file with the Supreme Court, Kings County, copies of their unredacted expert affidavits.

Since it is readily apparent from the record that the plaintiffs mistakenly believed in good faith that they were not required to name their experts or their qualifications *(cf., Rubenstein v Columbia Presbyt. Med. Center,*139 Misc 2d 349), we remit the matter to the Supreme Court in order to allow the plaintiffs an opportunity to resubmit the affidavits from " 'named expert[s] which shall set forth [their] qualifications as * * * expert[s] and the evidentiary facts upon which [they base their] opinion’ ” *(Maust v Arseneau,*116 AD2d 1012, *7941013, quoting from *Coley v Michelin Tire Corp.,*88 AD2d 651). Lawrence, J. P., Eiber, Balletta and Ritter, JJ., concur.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v William J. Risalek, Appellant.

Crew III, J.

Appeals (1) from a judgment of the County Court of Broome County (Mathews, J.), rendered December 14, 1987, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crime of attempted rape in the first *871degree, and (2) by permission, from an order of said court (Monserrate, J.), entered January 11, 1989, which denied defendant’s motion pursuant to CPL 440.10 to vacate the judgment of conviction, without a hearing.

Defendant, indicted for rape in the first degree, has been convicted upon his plea of guilty of attempted rape in the first degree for which he was sentenced to an indeterminate term of imprisonment of 5 to 15 years. Following his conviction defendant unsuccessfully moved to vacate the judgment on the grounds that it was procured by fraud and coercion and that he was denied effective assistance of counsel. On this appeal defendant asserts that the plea allocution was inadequate and that his CPL article 440 application was improperly denied.

Defendant failed to raise an objection to the adequacy of the plea allocution before County Court and has, therefore, failed to preserve that issue for our review *(see, People v Lopez,*71 NY2d 662, 665). In any event, defendant pleaded guilty to a lesser crime than that with which he was charged and may not now challenge the factual basis for the plea *(see, People v Pelchat,*62 NY2d 97, 108; *People v Buitrago,*125 AD2d 322). Finally, it is clear that after defendant disclaimed memory of certain of the criminal events giving rise to the charge, County Court made more than sufficient inquiry to ensure that he was knowingly entering his plea *(see, People v Wedge-wood,*106 AD2d 674).

Defendant’s CPL article 440 application was properly denied without a hearing. His allegations concerning fraud and coercion are contradicted by the transcript of the minutes of the plea allocution which clearly demonstrate that he knowingly entered his plea. Defendant’s allegations that his trial counsel failed to interview witnesses who would allegedly demonstrate the involuntariness of admissions made to the police at the station house were not supported by other evidence or affidavits and, under the circumstances of this case, there was no reasonable possibility that they were true (CPL 440.30 [4] [d]). We find defendant’s other contentions equally without merit.

Judgment and order affirmed. Casey, J. P., Weiss, Mercure, Crew III and Harvey, JJ., concur.
Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCWC-11-0000613 09-APR-2012 01:32 PM

NO. SCWC-11-0000613
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI ' I
ARYN NAKAOKA, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Petitioner/Plaintiff-Appellee/Cross-Appellant,

vs. HILTON HAWAIIAN VILLAGE, LLC, dba HILTON HAWAIIAN VILLAGE BEACH RESORT AND SPA, Respondent/Defendant-Appellant/Cross-Appellee.

CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS (CIVIL NO. 08-1-2512-12)
ORDER ACCEPTING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI AND AFFIRMING ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION (By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, Acoba, and McKenna, JJ. and Circuit Judge Trader, in place of Duffy, J., recused)
Petitioner/plaintiff-appellee/cross-appellant Aryn Nakaoka filed an application for writ of certiorari on February 27, 2012 to review the ICA’s January 27, 2012 order dismissing petitioner’s cross-appeal for lack of appellate jurisdiction. Petitioner cross-appealed from the June 2, 2011 Final Judgment entered in Civil No. 08-1-2512-12, but the ICA dismissed the cross-appeal for lack of jurisdiction upon concluding that the cross-appeal was untimely. We conclude that the ICA lacked jurisdiction because the cross-appeal was premature, notuntimely. Petitioner’s circuit court complaint in Civil No. 08-1­ 2512-12 asserted claims for “unfair or deceptive acts or practices in the conduct of a trade or commerce and/or unfair methods of competition.” The claim for unfair methods of competition was resolved in favor of the defendant by an October 20, 2010 summary judgment order. The claim for unfair or deceptive practices was resolved in favor of petitioner by a July 7, 2011 summary judgment order on liability, a February 2, 2011 jury verdict on damages, and the June 2, 2011 Final Judgment. The June 2, 2011 judgment entered judgment “in favor of [petitioner] and against [the defendant] in the amount of $ 337,435.32 [.]” The judgment did not identify the claim -­ unfair or deceptive practices -- for which the judgment was entered, nor did it enter judgment in favor of the defendant on claim for unfair methods of competition. The judgment, which purported to be the final judgment in Civil No. 08-1-2512-12, was not an appealable final judgment pursuant to HRCP 58 and Jenkins

v. Cades Schutte Fleming & Wright , 76 Hawai ' i 115, 119, 869 P.2d 1334, 1338 (1994) (in a multiple claim circuit court action, the judgment entered pursuant to HRCP 58 must identify the claims for which the judgment is entered and must, on its face, show finality as to all claims). Petitioner’s cross-appeal from the June 2, 2011 Final Judgment was premature and the ICA lacked appellate jurisdiction. Therefore,

- 2 ­IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: (1) the application for writ of certiorari, filed on February 27, 2012, is accepted and (2) the ICA’s January 27, 2012 order dismissing the cross-appeal for lack of jurisdiction is affirmed for the reason that the cross- appeal was premature. DATED: Honolulu, Hawai ' i, April 9, 2012. /s/ Mark E. Recktenwald /s/ Paula A. Nakayama /s/ Simeon R. Acoba, Jr. /s/ Sabrina S. McKenna /s/ Rom A. Trader

- 3 ­
<PAGE>   1
               Consent of Ernst & Young LLP, Independent Auditors


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form
S-8 No. 333-18899) pertaining to the Amended and Restated 1994 Stock Option Plan
and the Outside Directors Stock Option Plan of OmniAmerica, Inc. (formerly
Specialty Teleconstructors, Inc) of our report dated September 16, 1998, with
respect to the consolidated financial statements of OmniAmerica, Inc. (formerly
Specialty Teleconstructors, Inc.) included in the Annual Report (Form 10-KSB)
for the year ended June 30, 1998.


                                             /s/ Ernst & Young LLP


Dallas, Texas
September 24, 1998
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                              5
<RESTATED>

<S>                                    <C>                 <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                          12-MOS              6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                      DEC-31-1995         JUN-30-1996
<PERIOD-START>                         JAN-1-1995          JAN-1-1996
<PERIOD-END>                           DEC-31-1995         JUN-30-1996
<CASH>                                 3,707,100           2,504,603
<SECURITIES>                           0                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                          0                   2,000,000
<ALLOWANCES>                           0                   0
<INVENTORY>                            0                   0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                       3,718,157           4,522,232
<PP&E>                                 167,963             172,018
<DEPRECIATION>                         67,259              89,512
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                         3,820,452           3,649,095
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                  299,632             1,254,174
<BONDS>                                0                   0
<COMMON>                               60,100              61,719
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                  0                   0
<PREFERRED>                            7,025               8,075
<OTHER-SE>                             3,453,695           3,579,301
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>           3,820,452           4,903,269
<SALES>                                0                   0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                       0                   0
<CGS>                                  0                   0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                          2,374,983           2,631,769
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                       0                   0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                       0                   0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                     0                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                        (2,122,435)         (1,054,757)
<INCOME-TAX>                           0                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                    0                   0
<DISCONTINUED>                         0                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                        0                   0
<CHANGES>                              0                   0
<NET-INCOME>                           (2,122,435)         (1,054,757)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                          (.35)               (.17)
<EPS-DILUTED>                          (.35)               (.17)