alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32 

Certification of CEO and CFO Pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

as Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of TPG Specialty Lending, Inc. (the “Company”) for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2017, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), Joshua Easterly and Michael Fishman, as Co-Chief Executive Officers of the Company, and Ian Simmonds, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to such officer’s knowledge: 

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

 

| /s/ Joshua Easterly |
|---------------------|
| Name:               |   | Joshua Easterly |
| Title:              |   | Co-Chief Executive Officer |
| Date:               |   | November 7, 2017 |

 

| /s/ Michael Fishman |
|---------------------|
| Name:               |   | Michael Fishman |
| Title:              |   | Co-Chief Executive Officer |
| Date:               |   | November 7, 2017 |

 

| /s/ Ian Simmonds |
|------------------|
| Name:            |   | Ian Simmonds |
| Title:           |   | Chief Financial Officer |
| Date:            |   | November 7, 2017 |

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

February 27, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice
130172 Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, Justices

v SC: 130172 COA: 265616 Saginaw CC: 98-016662-FC JOE LEE JACKSON, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the November 7, 2005 order of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.

s0221 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

February 27, 2006

Clerk
EXHIBIT 99

Supplementary Trust Data

|1. The total amount of cash distributed to Certificateholders in 2000 per $1,000 of Certificates                                              | $241.50        
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ---------------
|2. The total amount of the distribution set forth in paragraph l which represents principal payments on the Certificates                      | $173.50        
|3. The amount of outstanding balances in the Accounts which were 30 or more days delinquent as of the end of the December 2000 Monthly Period | $576,410,372.93
|4. The total amount of the Monthly Servicing Fee paid to the Servicer by the Trust in 2000                                                    | $175,664,014.83
#### Robert Cockrell, Appellant, v Diane Cockrell, Respondent.

Judgment unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Plaintiff appeals from portions of a judgment of divorce that directed him to pay 70% of the actual private college expenses for his daughter Terri Lynn incurred to the beginning of the term of September, 1990 to a maximum of $8,000 per year, and ordered him to pay defendant maintenance of $250 per week until July 13, 1999 and $125 per week thereafter to continue until June 2, 2006. Defendant cross-appeals, arguing that the court’s award of child support for Terri Lynn should be increased and that the court abused its discretion in awarding attorney’s fees.

Defendant established special circumstances to require plaintiff to pay for Terri Lynn’s private college education as ordered by the court *(see, Hirsch v Hirsch,*142 AD2d 138, 144; *"Lord” v "Lord”,*96 Misc 2d 434, 439). Throughout the marriage, the parties placed a strong emphasis on the education of their children. Special education was arranged at private schools to meet each child’s particular needs. Terri Lynn attended a private school to meet her special needs. Plaintiff’s financial condition permits him to pay the college expenses as the court ordered. Terri Lynn applied to a public college but was not accepted. Under these circumstances the court did not abuse its discretion in this regard *(see, Keehn v Keehn,*137 AD2d 493, 497-498).

The court also did not abuse its discretion in awarding defendant maintenance. The court properly considered the statutory factors *(see,*Domestic Relations Law § 236 [B] [6] [a] [1]-[11]). Defendant devoted most of her married life to raising the children and caring for the home, enabling plaintiff to attend college, obtain an engineering degree and earn a substantial income. Defendant did not graduate from high school and has limited ability to become self-supporting. During this 30 year marriage the parties enjoyed a fairly affluent lifestyle. Under these circumstances the court’s award of maintenance was proper in both duration and amount *(see, Reck v Reck,*149 AD2d 934; *Wilkinson v Wilkinson,*149 AD2d 842; *Di Bella v Di Bella,*140 AD2d 292).

*1025Addressing the issues raised on the cross appeal, we conclude that the court’s award of child support was adequate and that the court did not abuse its discretion in determining the amount of attorney’s fees. (Appeal from Judgment of Supreme Court, Erie County, Forma, J.—Divorce.) Present— Dillon, P. J., Callahan, Denman, Green and Pine, JJ.
AFS-13-166-E February 22, 2013

Exemption No. 10713 Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2013-0035

Mr. Mike Lott Parent of Brayden Lott

256 Gallant Fox Lane Webster, NY 14580

Dear Mr. Lott:

This letter is to inform you that we have granted your request for exemption. It transmits our decision, explains its basis, and lists the conditions and limitations of the exemption, including the date it ends.

The Basis for Our Decision

By letter received January 15, 2013, you petitioned the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) on behalf of Brayden Lott for an exemption from § 121.311(b)(2)(iii)(B) of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR). That exemption, if granted, would allow Brayden to exceed the specified weight limit for an FAA-approved child restraint system (CAReS, manufactured by AmSafe Corporation) during use of that child restraint system (CRS) aboard a United States (U.S.) aircraft.

The FAA has determined that good cause exists for not publishing a summary of the petition

in the Federal Register because the requested exemption would not set a precedent and any delay in acting on this petition would be detrimental to Brayden.

The FAA has issued grants of exemption in circumstances similar in all material respects to those presented in your petition. In Grant of Exemption No. 9834 (copy enclosed), the FAA2

found that numerous people with physical challenges had previously completed flights using restraint systems that addressed unique physical needs regarding safety, support, and security in the same manner of operations as described in this petition. The FAA further found that the petition, if granted, would not set any new precedents regarding the use of restraint systems by persons with disabilities.

Having reviewed your reasons for requesting an exemption, I find that—

 they do not differ materially from those presented by the petitioner in the enclosed grant.

 the reasons stated by the FAA for granting the enclosed exemption also apply to the situation you present; and

 a grant of exemption is in the public interest.

Our Decision

Under the authority contained in 49 U.S.C. 40113 and 44701, which the FAA Administrator has delegated to me, I hereby grant Brayden Lott exemption from 14 CFR § 121.311(b)(2)(iii)(B). In addition, any air carrier or commercial operator operating under part 121 while Brayden is aboard its aircraft is granted an exemption from 14 CFR § 121.311(b)(2)(iii)(B) to the extent necessary to allow Brayden to exceed the specified weight limit for an FAA-approved CRS during use of that CRS aboard a U.S.

aircraft.

All operations under this exemption must be conducted with at least one of Brayden’s parents or a caregiver accompanying him. Brayden Lott may only occupy a passenger seat with no passenger seated behind him. In addition, Brayde n’s parent or caregiver must carry a copy of this exemption and advise the air carrier about the contents of the exemption at least 48 hours before the date of each flight.

This exemption terminates on February 28, 2015, unless sooner superseded or rescinded.

Sincerely,

/s/

Michael J. Zenkivich Acting Deputy Director, Flight Standards

Service

Enclosure
UNITED STATES

                       SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

                             WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

                                    FORM 10-K

                  Annual Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d)

                     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

                   For the fiscal year ended December 31, 1998

Commission File Number 0-24280

                         SHEARSON MID-WEST FUTURES FUND
             (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

         New York                                       13-3634370        
    (State or other jurisdiction of                  (I.R.S. Employer
     incorporation or organization)                 Identification No.)

                    c/o Smith Barney Futures Management Inc.
                           390 Greenwich St. - 1st Fl.
                            New York, New York 10013
              (Address and Zip Code of principal executive offices)

                               (212) 723-5424 
              (Registrant's telephone number, including area code)

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:  None

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:  None

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required
to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during
the  preceding 12 months (or for such  shorter  period that the  registrant  was
required  to file  such  reports),  and  (2) has  been  subject  to such  filing
requirements for the past 90 days.

                                    Yes X No

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent  filers  pursuant to Item 405
of Regulation  S-K is not contained  herein,  and will not be contained,  to the
best of registrant's  knowledge,  in definitive proxy or information  statements
incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this
form 10-K [X]

As of February 28, 1999  Limited  Partnership  Units with an aggregate  value of
$57,721,067 were outstanding and held by non-affiliates.

                       DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

                                      None
II 

Calendar No. 35 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 680 

To rescind amounts appropriated for fiscal year 2013 for the Department 

of Defense for the Medium Extended Air Defense System, and for 

other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

APRIL 9, 2013 

Ms. AYOTTE (for herself and Mr. BEGICH) introduced the following bill; which 

was read the first time 

APRIL 10, 2013 

Read the second time and placed on the calendar 

A BILL 

To rescind amounts appropriated for fiscal year 2013 for 

the Department of Defense for the Medium Extended 

Air Defense System, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 680 PCS

1 SECTION 1. RESCISSION OF AMOUNTS FOR FISCAL YEAR 

2 2013 FOR THE DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE 

3 FOR THE MEDIUM EXTENDED AIR DEFENSE 

4 SYSTEM. 

5 (a) RESCISSION.—The amount appropriated or other6 wise made available by title IV of division C of the Consoli7 dated and Further Continuing Appropriations Act, 2013 

8 (Public Law 113–6) under the heading ‘‘RESEARCH, DE9 VELOPMENT, TEST AND EVALUATION, ARMY’’ for the Me10 dium Extended Air Defense System (MEADS), namely 

11 $380,900,000, is hereby rescinded. 

12 (b) INCREASE IN AMOUNT FOR OPERATION AND

13 MAINTENANCE.—The aggregate amount appropriated by 

14 title II of division C of the Consolidated and Further Con15 tinuing Appropriations Act, 2013 is increased by 

16 $205,000,000, with the amount to be allocated among ac17 counts funded by that title in a manner determined appro18 priate by the Secretary of Defense. The Secretary shall 

19 submit to Congress a report describing the allocation of 

20 funds among accounts pursuant to this subsection. 


sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with BILLS

sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Calendar No. 35 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 680 

A BILL 

To rescind amounts appropriated for fiscal year 

other purposes. dium Extended Air Defense System, and for 2013 for the Department of Defense for the MeAPRIL 10, 2013 

Read the second time and placed on the calendar 


sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

DANIEL STEVE DIXON,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

 v.

S. LAROSA, Correctional Officer; et al.,

Defendants-Appellees.

No. 15-15812

D.C. No. 2:10-cv-01441-TLNKJN

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of California

Troy L. Nunley, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted July 26, 2016** 

Before: SCHROEDER, CANBY, and CALLAHAN, Circuit Judges.

California state prisoner Daniel Steve Dixon appeals pro se from the district

court’s summary judgment in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action arising out of an

allegedly retaliatory cell search. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. 

We review de novo, Toguchi v. Chung, 391 F.3d 1051, 1056 (9th Cir. 2004), and

FILED

AUG 04 2016

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

 * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

 ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
we affirm.

The district court properly granted summary judgment on Dixon’s retaliation

claim against defendant LaRosa because Dixon failed to raise a genuine dispute of

material fact as to whether LaRosa was aware of any protected activity when he

searched Dixon’s cell. See Rhodes v. Robinson, 408 F.3d 559, 567-68 (9th Cir.

2005) (setting forth elements of a retaliation claim in the prison context).

To the extent that Dixon intended to challenge the dismissal of his retaliation

claim against defendant Keenan, we do not consider this issue because it was not

specifically and distinctly raised and argued in the opening brief. See Padgett v.

Wright, 587 F.3d 983, 985 n.2 (9th Cir. 2009).

AFFIRMED.

2 15-15812
```

[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 173 (Thursday, September 6, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Page 45237]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-19450]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FARM CREDIT ADMINISTRATION

Sunshine Act Meeting; Farm Credit Administration Board

AGENCY: Farm Credit Administration.

ACTION: Notice, regular meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the Government in the 
Sunshine Act, of the regular meeting of the Farm Credit Administration 
Board (Board).

DATES: The regular meeting of the Board will be held at the offices of 
the Farm Credit Administration in McLean, Virginia, on September 13, 
2018, from 9:00 a.m. until such time as the Board concludes its 
business.

ADDRESSES: Farm Credit Administration, 1501 Farm Credit Drive, McLean, 
Virginia 22102-5090. Submit attendance requests via email to 
[email protected]. See SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION for further 
information about attendance requests.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dale L. Aultman, Secretary to the Farm 
Credit Administration Board, (703) 883-4009, TTY (703) 883-4056, 
[email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Parts of this meeting of the Board will be 
open to the public (limited space available) and parts will be closed 
to the public. Please send an email to [email protected] at least 
24 hours before the meeting. In your email include: name, postal 
address, entity you are representing (if applicable), and telephone 
number. You will receive an email confirmation from us. Please be 
prepared to show a photo identification when you arrive. If you need 
assistance for accessibility reasons, or if you have any questions, 
contact Dale L. Aultman, Secretary to the Farm Credit Administration 
Board, at (703) 883-4009. The matters to be considered at the meeting 
are:

Open Session

A. Approval of Minutes
     August 9, 2018
B. Report
     Quarterly Report on Economic Conditions and FCS Condition 
and Performance
C. New Business
     Final Rule: Farmer Mac Investment Eligibility
     Revised Bookletter: Director Election Nomination 
Procedures

Closed Session\*\

 Office of Examination Quarterly Report

    Dated: September 4, 2018.
Dale L. Aultman,
Secretary, Farm Credit Administration Board.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \*\ Session Closed--Exempt pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(8) and 
(9).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

[FR Doc. 2018-19450 Filed 9-4-18; 4:15 pm]
 BILLING CODE 6705-01-P
```
EXHIBIT 32.1

                  CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND
                           CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER OF
                            JASPER EXPLORATIONS INC.
             FORM 10-Q FOR THE SIX MONTH PERIOD ENDED JUNE 30, 2012
                 PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Robert Denman, am the Chief Executive Officer and acting Chief Financial
Officer of Jasper Explorations Inc., a Nevada corporation (the "Company"). I am
delivering this certificate in connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q
of the Company for the Six month period ended June 30, 2012 and filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission ("Quarterly Report").

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I hereby certify that, to the best of my knowledge,
the Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information
contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Date: August 24, 2012                    By: /s/ Robert Denman
                                             -----------------------------------
                                             Robert Denman
                                             Chief Executive Officer, President,
                                             acting Chief Financial Officer,
                                             acting Principal Accounting Officer
                                             and Director
<PAGE>   1

                                                                      EXHIBIT 21

                    SUBSIDIARIES OF THE TIMES MIRROR COMPANY

                            AS OF DECEMBER 31, 1999*

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                              STATE (OR COUNTRY)
                            NAME                               OF INCORPORATION
                            ----                              ------------------
<S>                                                           <C>
AchieveGlobal, Inc..........................................  Florida
The Baltimore Sun Company...................................  Maryland
Eagle New Media Investments, LLC**..........................  Delaware
Eagle Publishing Investments, LLC**.........................  Delaware
E Z Buy & E Z Sell Recycler Corporation.....................  Delaware
The Hartford Courant Company................................  Connecticut
Jeppesen & Co., GmbH***.....................................  Germany
Jeppesen Sanderson, Inc.....................................  Delaware
The Morning Call, Inc.......................................  Pennsylvania
Newsday, Inc.***............................................  New York
The StayWell Company........................................  Delaware
Times Mirror Magazines, Inc.***.............................  New York
</TABLE>

---------------
  * The names of certain other subsidiaries have been omitted because,
    considered in the aggregate as a single subsidiary, they would not
    constitute a significant subsidiary. The Los Angeles Times is a division of
    The Times Mirror Company.

 ** Affiliates that are controlled by the Registrant as described in Note 5 to
    the consolidated financial statements.

*** 100% owned by a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Registrant. (All other
    subsidiaries listed above are directly wholly-owned by the Registrant.)
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the accompanying quarterly report of Kosmos Energy Ltd. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, W. Greg Dunlevy, Chief Financial Officer and Executive Vice President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

 
| (1) |   | The   Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or   15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                      |
|-----|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| (2) |   | The   information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material   respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |

 
| Date:   June 6, 2011 | */s/ W. Greg Dunlevy*                                                                   |
|---------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                      | W.   Greg Dunlevy                                                                       |
|                      | Chief   Financial Officer and Executive Vice President    (Principal Financial Officer) |

 

*A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.*

 

----