alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 174 (Friday, September 7, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Page 45436]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-19396]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket Nos. CP17-178-000]

Notice of Anticipated Schedule of Final Order for the Alaska 
Gasline Development Corporation Alaska LNG Project

    On April 17, 2017, Alaska Gasline Development Corporation filed an 
application in Docket No. CP17-178-000, pursuant to section 3 of the 
Natural Gas Act and Part 153 of the Commission's regulations, for 
authorization to site, construct, and operate a new liquefied natural 
gas (LNG) export terminal and associated facilities on the eastern 
shore of Cook Inlet in the Nikiski area of the Kenai Peninsula in 
Alaska, and to construct approximately 871 miles of natural gas 
pipeline and associated facilities, all within the State of Alaska. The 
proposed project, known as the Alaska LNG (Project), would liquefy and 
export up to 20.0 million metric tons per annum of LNG.
    In accordance with Title 41 of the Fixing America's Surface 
Transportation Act, enacted on December 4, 2015, agencies are to 
publish completion dates for all federal environmental reviews and 
authorizations. This notice identifies the Commission's anticipated 
schedule for issuance of the final order for the Project, which is 
based on the anticipated date of issuance of the final Environmental 
Impact Statement. Accordingly, we currently anticipate issuing a final 
order in the Project no later than:

Issuance of Final Order--February 6, 2020

    If a schedule change becomes necessary for the final order, an 
additional notice will be provided so that interested parties and 
government agencies are kept informed of the Project's progress.

    Dated: August 31, 2018.
Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2018-19396 Filed 9-6-18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
```
EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned hereby certifies that the
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2011 of Conex MD,
Inc. (the "Company") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information
contained in such report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: May 13, 2011


/s/ Dr. Jacob Bar-Ilan
------------------------------------------
Dr. Jacob Bar-Ilan, Secretary, Treasurer
and Director (Principal Accounting Officer
and Principal Financial Officer)
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Denali Commission","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.denali.gov","author_name":"Brian Aldridge","author_url":"https:\/\/www.denali.gov\/author\/baldridge\/","title":"Denali Commission Fiscal Year 2023 Funding Opportunity","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"c42vU2MW69\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.denali.gov\/denali-commission-fiscal-year-2023-funding-opportunity\/\">Denali Commission Fiscal Year 2023 Funding Opportunity<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.denali.gov\/denali-commission-fiscal-year-2023-funding-opportunity\/embed\/#?secret=c42vU2MW69\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Denali Commission Fiscal Year 2023 Funding Opportunity” — Denali Commission\" data-secret=\"c42vU2MW69\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.denali.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/02\/logo-1.png","thumbnail_width":189,"thumbnail_height":188}
EXHIBIT 32





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350





In connection with the quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Apollo Acquisition Corporation (the “Company”) for the quarter ended March 31, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Joseph Rozelle, President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge that:





1.
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








Date: My 13, 2011





/s/ Joseph RozelleJoseph Rozelle

President

(Principal Executive and Financial Officer)











The foregoing certification is being furnished as an exhibit to the Report pursuant to Item 601(b)(32) of Regulation S-K and  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code) and, accordingly, is not being filed as part of the Report for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not incorporated by reference into any filings of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Gregory Richardson, Appellant.

Judgment, Supreme Court, *439New York County (Rena Uviller, J.), rendered September 18, 1989, convicting defendant of two counts of robbery in the first degree, and one count of burglary in the first degree, and sentencing him as a violent predicate felon, to three concurrent terms of 12 *Vi*to 25 years, unanimously affirmed.

Defendant and an accomplice gained entry to the victims’ apartment, and stole a television, a VCR and other items. During the robbery, the defendant threatened the victims with a 10 inch knife, and hit one of the victims over the head, knocking him down.

A week later, one victim was awakened in the middle of the night by police sirens. Looking out of his window, he saw defendant, handcuffed, being led away in police custody. He notified police on the following day. The other victim identified defendant in a lineup, and both victims positively identified defendant in court.

Defendant’s challenge to the prosecutor’s comment on summation that although the People had "files and files full of paperwork,” their failure to produce physical evidence at trial was not relevant in view of the credible testimonial evidence, was inaptly phrased. However, it is clear from the context of the entire passage that the prosecutor was only distinguishing the quantum of physical evidence from the testimonial evidence. In any event, the objection was not preserved by specific objection at trial, waiving the claim for review (CPL 470.05 [2]; *People v Balls,*69 NY2d 641), and we perceive no basis to review in the interest of justice.

Defendant failed to object to the Court’s instructions in the identification charge, that identity must be proven by the People with "sufficient certainty to preclude any reasonable possibility” of mistaken identification. As such, defendant has failed to preserve the issue for review. Although we note that "reasonable certainty” language has been condemned, and the present instruction is improper *(see, People v Reyes,*151 AD2d 435; *People v Morris,*100 AD2d 600), in view of the strong identification evidence, and the absence of other errors which affect the substantive rights of defendant, we decline to review in the interest of justice.

Finally, when counsel, on cross-examination, elicited that the victim saw defendant on a later occasion but did not call the police, the People could properly establish on re-direct that the victim had seen defendant being arrested on an unrelated crime, thus obviating any imminent need to call police. The court then provided a limiting instruction with *440respect to this testimony, that it must not be considered as proof of the charged crime. Defendant failed to object to the court’s limiting instruction, thereby waiving it for review. As such no review in the interest of justice is warranted. Concur —Murphy, P. J., Carro, Ellerin, Wallach and Asch, JJ.
## F IFTH 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________ C ase No. 5D 23- 720 LT Case No. 2020

- CF

- 002541 -A

_____________________________ J OSEPH K ING , A ppellant,

v. S TATE OF F LORIDA , A ppellee.

_____________________________
On a ppeal from the Circuit Court f or Duval County

. Mark B orello , J udge

. Matthew J

. M etz, Public D efender, a nd Ali L. H ansen , Assistant Public D e fender, Daytona B e ach, for A ppe llant. Ashley M oody, A ttorney G e neral, an d Michael Scha ub , Assistant Attorney G eneral, Tallahassee , for A ppellee. April 9, 2024

P ER C URIAM

. A FFIRMED

. W ALLIS , B OATWRIGHT , and P RATT , JJ., concur .2 _____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331
.

_____________________________
#### John MANNING, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 67-250.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Second District.

Oct. 13, 1967.

Rehearing Denied Nov. 13, 1967.

Robert E. Jagger, Public Defender, and Carleton L. Weidemeyer, Asst. Public Defender, Clearwater, for appellant.

Earl Faircloth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Robert R. Crittenden, Asst. Atty. Gen., Lakeland, for appellee.

SHANNON, Judge.

This is an appeal from an order denying without a hearing a motion for postconviction relief filed pursuant to Fla.R.Crim.P. 1, F.S.A. ch. 924 Appendix.

Appellant John Manning was charged with breaking and entering a building other than a dwelling house with intent to commit a felony. After originally pleading not guilty, he substituted a plea of guilty and was sentenced to a prison term of six months to five years. As grounds for his postconviction motion he asserted denial of pretrial benefit of counsel, failure to be informed of his right against self-incrimination, unfair trial and promise of a lighter sentence by his court-appointed counsel inducing him to plead guilty.

It is very well established that a voluntary plea of guilty waives all defects not jurisdictional or fundamental. Thomas v. State, Fla.App. 1967, 201 So.2d 834, 835; Hines v. State, Fla.App.1967, 195 So.2d 605, 606; Childs v. State, Fla.App.1966, 190 So.2d 605, 606. The fact that a plea of guilty is entered because of the defense *361attorney’s promise of a lighter sentence does not render such plea involuntary. Baker v. State, Fla.App.1966, 188 So.2d 346; Pitts v. State, Fla.App.1966, 181 So.2d 739, 740; Manning v. State, Fla.App.1965, 176 So.2d 380, 381. This is equally the law where the defense attorney is court-appointed. Pitts v. State, supra 181 So.2d at 740. A criminal defendant cannot be given the option of rejecting his uncoerced plea of guilty if his sentence fails to conform with his expectations.

Therefore, appellant’s plea of guilty must be considered voluntary. As such, it has the effect of waiving all defects alleged by appellant, none of which are jurisdictional or fundamental.

Accordingly, the order denying appellant’s motion must be and is affirmed.

Affirmed.

LILES, C. J., and PIERCE, J., concur.
EXHIBIT 32.02








CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002














In connection with the Annual Report of Morgan Stanley Spectrum Smith Barney Global Balanced L.P. (the “Partnership”) on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Christian Angstadt, Chief Financial Officer of Demeter Management LLC, the general partner of the Partnership, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:




(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.




















By:             /s/            Christian Angstadt





Name:                       Christian Angstadt


Title:                      Chief Financial Officer of Demeter Management LLC,


general partner of the registrant





Date:                      March 29, 2010
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

Securities and Exchange Commission

100 F Street, N.E.

Washington, D.C. 20549

 

RE:     Certification pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350)

 

Ladies and Gentlemen:

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of SandRidge Mississippian Trust I (the “Trust”) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2015 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, not in its individual capacity but solely as the Trustee of the Trust, certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, that to its knowledge:

 

(1)                                     The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

(2)                                     The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Trust.

 

The above certification is furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350) and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.

 

 
|   | /s/   Sarah Newell                                                                                  |
|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   | Sarah   Newell                                                                                      |
|   | Vice   President                                                                                    |
|   | The   Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A.,

as   Trustee of SandRidge Mississippian Trust I |

 

August 7, 2015

 

----
----

Action brought on 10 January 2005 by France Télécom against Commission of the European Communities

(Case T-17/05)

(2005/C 82/63)

Language of the case: French

An action against the Commission of the European Communities was brought before the Court of First Instance of the European Communities on 10 January 2005 by France Télécom, having its principal place of business in Paris, represented by Antoine Gosset-Grainville and Laurent Godfroid, lawyers.

The applicant claims that the Court should:

Pleas in law and main arguments

The pleas in law and main arguments put forward by the applicant in the present case are identical to those which it put forward in Case T-427/04.

----
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Allen Black, Appellant.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Westchester County (Cowhey, J.), rendered May 5, 1987, convicting him of manslaughter in the first degree, attempted murder in the second degree, and criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree (two counts), upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant contends that his conviction should be reversed because numerous errors were committed by the court in its charge to the jury, and by the People in their summation. He also contends that the court erred when it failed to instruct the jury with respect to the lesser included offenses of manslaughter in the second degree and attempted assault in the first degree. Further, the defendant claims that the jury’s verdict was against the weight of the evidence, and that the court imposed an excessive sentence. We find that the alleged errors claimed by the defendant have either been unpreserved for our review *(see,*CPL 470.05 [2]), or lack merit. Thompson, J. P., Brown, Harwood and Balletta, JJ., concur.
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 536 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 536

To require a study and report by the Comptroller General of the United 
           States regarding the costs of Federal regulations.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 12, 2013

   Mr. Rubio introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To require a study and report by the Comptroller General of the United 
           States regarding the costs of Federal regulations.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Regulation Costs to America Act''.

SEC. 2. GAO STUDY ON THE COST OF FEDERAL REGULATIONS.

    (a) In General.--The Comptroller General of the United States shall 
conduct an annual study of the total costs of Federal regulations.
    (b) Requirement.--In conducting the study required under subsection 
(a), the Comptroller General of the United States shall use a 
methodology substantially similar to the methodology used in conducting 
the study described in the report entitled ``The Impact of Regulatory 
Costs on Small Firms'' (September 2010), prepared on behalf of the 
Office of Advocacy of the Small Business Administration.
    (c) Report.--Not later than 1 year after the date of enactment of 
this Act, and every year thereafter, the Comptroller General of the 
United States shall submit to Congress a report on the findings of the 
study conducted under subsection (a), which shall include an estimate 
of the total annual costs of Federal regulations by agency, as such 
term is defined in section 551 of title 5, United States Code.
    (d) Funding.--The General Accountability Office shall carry out 
this section using unobligated funds otherwise made available to the 
General Accountability Office.
    (e) Sense of Congress.--It is the sense of Congress that no 
additional funds should be made available to carry out this section.
                                 <all>
```
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 173 (Thursday, September 6, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Page 45285]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-19425]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL TRANSPORTATION SAFETY BOARD


Sunshine Act Meeting

TIME AND DATE:  9:00 a.m., Tuesday, September 25, 2018.

PLACE:  NTSB Conference Center, 429 L'Enfant Plaza SW, Washington, DC 
20594.

STATUS:  The two items are open to the public.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: 
58357 Highway Special Investigation of Pedestrian Safety
58387 Aircraft Incident Report--Taxiway Overflight, Air Canada Flight 
759, Airbus A320-211, C-FKCK, San Francisco, California, July 7, 2017

NEWS MEDIA CONTACT:  Telephone: (202) 314-6100.
    The press and public may enter the NTSB Conference Center one hour 
prior to the meeting for set up and seating.
    Individuals requesting specific accommodations should contact 
Rochelle McCallister at (202) 314-6305 or by email at 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#fba99498939e97979ed5b698b89a979792888f9e89bb958f8899d59c948d"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="f9ab969a919c95959cd7b49aba989595908a8d9c8bb9978d8a9bd79e968f">[email protected]</span></a> by Wednesday, September 19, 2018.
    The public may view the meeting via a live or archived webcast by 
accessing a link under ``News & Events'' on the NTSB home page at 
www.ntsb.gov.
    Schedule updates, including weather-related cancellations, are also 
available at www.ntsb.gov.

FOR MORE INFORMATION CONTACT:  Candi Bing at (202) 314-6403 or by email 
at <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#ddbfb4b3babe9db3a9aebff3bab2ab"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="25474c4b4246654b5156470b424a53">[email protected]</span></a>.

FOR MEDIA INFORMATION CONTACT:  Christopher O'Neil at (202) 314-6100 or 
by email at <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#a5c6cdd7ccd6d1cad5cdc0d78bcacbc0ccc9c9e5cbd1d6c78bc2cad3"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="8eede6fce7fdfae1fee6ebfca0e1e0ebe7e2e2cee0fafdeca0e9e1f8">[email protected]</span></a> for the Highway Special 
Investigation of Pedestrian Safety and Keith Hollow at (202) 314-6100 
or by email at <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#f79c929e839fd99f989b9b9880968eb799838495d9909881"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="c8a3ada1bca0e6a0a7a4a4a7bfa9b188a6bcbbaae6afa7be">[email protected]</span></a> for the Aircraft Accident 
Report.

    Tuesday, September 4, 2018.
Candi R. Bing,
Federal Register Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. 2018-19425 Filed 9-4-18; 11:15 am]
 BILLING CODE 7533-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>