alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3669 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3669

To amend the Public Health Service Act with respect to determining the 
   amount of a supplemental grant under the emergency relief program 
              regarding the human immunodeficiency virus.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           November 22, 1993

  Mr. Nadler introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                    Committee on Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Public Health Service Act with respect to determining the 
   amount of a supplemental grant under the emergency relief program 
              regarding the human immunodeficiency virus.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``HIV Emergency Supplemental Grants 
Amendments of 1993''.

SEC. 2. DETERMINATION OF AMOUNT OF SUPPLEMENTAL GRANT UNDER EMERGENCY 
              RELIEF PROGRAM REGARDING HUMAN IMMUNODEFICIENCY VIRUS.

    (a) In General.--Section 2603(b)(3) of the Public Health Service 
Act (42 U.S.C. 300ff-13(b)(3)) is amended by inserting before the 
period the following: ``, and such amount shall be based primarily on 
the need of the eligible area for such a grant as indicated by the 
information provided in the application under paragraph (1) of such 
section''.
    (b) Conforming Amendment Regarding Applications for Supplemental 
Grants.--Section 2605(b) of the Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 
300ff-15(b)) is amended--
            (1) by redesignating paragraphs (1) through (4) as 
        paragraphs (2) through (5), respectively; and
            (2) by inserting before paragraph (2) (as so redesignated) 
        the following paragraph:
            ``(1) the cumulative number of cases reported and confirmed 
        under section 2601(a)(1)s;''.

SEC. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE.

    This Act takes effect October 1, 1993, or upon the date of the 
enactment of this Act, whichever occurs later.

                                 <all>
```
EX-10.07



Exhibit 10.07


 
 
 
      
            February 13, 2014
 
 
 
 

Mr. Andrew H. Tisch

667 Madison Avenue

New York, New York, 10065


 
 Dear Mr.
Tisch:
 
 
 Reference is made to your Amended and Restated Employment Agreement with Loews Corporation (the "Company") dated February 14,
2012, as amended on February 12, 2013 (the "Employment Agreement").
 
 
 This will confirm our agreement that the Employment Agreement is amended as follows:


 
 1.      Term of Employment.  The period of your employment under and pursuant to the Employment
Agreement is hereby extended for an additional period through and including March 31, 2015 upon all the terms, conditions and provisions of the Employment Agreement, as hereby amended.
 



2.   
   Compensation.  You shall be paid as basic compensation (the "Basic Compensation") for your services to the Company and its subsidiaries under and pursuant to
the Employment Agreement a salary at the rate of Nine Hundred Seventy-Five Thousand ($975,000) Dollars per annum through March 31, 2015.  Basic Compensation shall be payable
in accordance with the Company's customary payroll practices as in effect from time to time, and shall be subject to such increases as the Board of Directors of the Company, in its sole discretion, may from time to time determine.


 
 3.      Incentive Compensation Plan.  In addition to receipt of Basic Compensation under the
Employment Agreement, you shall participate in the Incentive Compensation Plan for Executive Officers of the Company (the "Compensation Plan") and shall be eligible to receive incentive compensation under the Compensation Plan as may be awarded in
accordance with its terms.
 
 
 4.      Other
Compensation.  The compensation provided pursuant to this Letter Agreement shall be exclusive of compensation and fees, if any, to which you may be entitled as an officer or director of a subsidiary of the Company.


 
 Except as herein modified or amended, the Employment Agreement shall remain in full force and effect.
 
 

 
     
 
    
  
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 

Mr. Andrew H. Tisch

February 13, 2014

Page 2
 


 
 
 If the foregoing is in accordance with your understanding, would you please sign the enclosed duplicate copy of this Letter Agreement at the place indicated below and return the same to us for our
records.
 
 
 
 
 
	
     
 	
     
 	 Very truly yours,
 
	  	  	  
	
     
 	
     
 	 LOEWS CORPORATION
 

 
 
 
 
	
     
 	
     
 	  	  
	
     
 	
     
 	  	  
	
     
 	
     
 	 By:
 	 /s/  Gary W. Garson
 
	
     
 	
     
 	  	
      Gary W. Garson
 
	
     
 	
     
 	  	
      Senior Vice President
 
	      

	
     
 	  	
     
 
	 Accepted and Agreed to:
 	
     
 	  	
     
 
	  	
     
 	  	
     
 
	 /s/ Andrew H. Tisch
 	
     
 	  	
     
 
	 Andrew H. Tisch
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Denali Commission","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.denali.gov","author_name":"rdata","author_url":"https:\/\/www.denali.gov\/author\/rdata\/","title":"Parking Information","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"liAzQrykLA\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.denali.gov\/parking-information\/\">Parking Information<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.denali.gov\/parking-information\/embed\/#?secret=liAzQrykLA\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Parking Information” — Denali Commission\" data-secret=\"liAzQrykLA\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n"}
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended
June 30, 2015 (the Report) of Solar Senior Capital Ltd. (the Registrant), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, RICHARD L. PETEKA, the Chief Financial Officer of the Registrant,
hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) The information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.



|      |  |                         
|----- |  | ------------------------
|      |  | /S/    RICHARD L.
PETEKA
|Name: |  | Richard L. Peteka       
|Date: |  | August 4, 2015
(April 9, 1991)

#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Edgar English, Appellant.

Judgment of the Supreme Court, New York County (Gold, J.), rendered September 27, 1989, convicting defendant after a jury trial of rape in the first degree, for which he was sentenced as a second felony offender to 6 to 12 years, unanimously affirmed.

The evidence in this case established that as the victim waited for a friend in front of her building, defendant drove by and offered to smoke crack with her. She entered his car, and smoked crack, during which time defendant made several allusions to her providing oral sex. She ignored him. They *216drove around for some time, before stopping in a Manhattan parking lot, and smoking more crack. At this point, defendant forcibly sodomized the victim, and commenced a 45 minute random drive which at least in part occurred in the Bronx. The victim testified that she did not know where they were driving, and at one point saw a sign for Yonkers. At some point in the drive, defendant pulled off to the side of the road, forced the victim to undress, demanded more oral sex, smoked more crack, and then raped her. At some point, they ended up back in Manhattan, where he dropped her off at her home. With respect to defendant’s jurisdictional challenge to the New York County venue, we cannot conclude that the People proved by a preponderance of the evidence *(People v Tullo,*34 NY2d 712) that it was impossible to determine in what county the rape occurred, permitting venue in any county through which the vehicle passed. (CPL 20.40 [4] [g].) The evidence does not lead us to conclude as a matter of law that the exact location of the rape can be ascertained *(cf., People v Moore,*46 NY2d 1). Additionally, we do not find that the jury erred in concluding that one element of the offense occurred in New York County pursuant to CPL 20.40 (1) (a). We have examined defendant’s remaining contentions and find them to be without merit. Concur—Murphy, P. J., Carro, Wallach, Kupferman and Asch, JJ.
**EXHIBIT 32**

 

November 9, 2016

 

Via EDGAR

 

Securities and Exchange Commission

Judiciary Plaza

450 Fifth Street, N.W.

Washington, D.C. 20549

 

Re:                             Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

 

Ladies and Gentlemen:

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of VOC Energy Trust (the “Trust”) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2016 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, not in its individual capacity but solely as the trustee of the Trust, certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to its knowledge:

 

(1)                                 The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

(2)                                 The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Trust.

 

The above certification is furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350) and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.

 
|     |     | The Bank   of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A. |
|----------|----------|---------------------------------------------------|
|     |     | Trustee   for VOC Energy Trust                    |
|     |     |                                              |
|     |     | By:                                               | /s/   MICHAEL J. ULRICH |
|     |     |                                              | Michael   J. Ulrich |
| * * | * * | * *                                          | *Vice President and Trust Officer* |

 

----
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Kenneth H. Marks, Appellant.

(Appeal No. 2.)

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Same Memorandum as in *People v Marks*([appeal No. 1] 172 AD2d 1069 [decided herewith]). (Appeal from Judgment of Erie County Court, D’Amico, J.—Attempted Criminal Possession Stolen Property, 3rd Degree.) Present— Doerr, J. P., Boomer, Green, Pine and Davis, JJ.
#### Ann Smith et al., Appellants, v Emkay Fifth Avenue, Inc., Respondent.

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the plaintiffs appeal from a judgment of *657the Supreme Court, Kings County (Garry, J.), dated July 21, 1989 which, upon a jury verdict, is in favor of the defendant and against them on the issue of liability.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

We find that the trial court properly precluded the plaintiff from bolstering her trial testimony by use of a prior consistent statement contained in a hospital record. An impeached witness cannot be rehabilitated by his or her antecedent consistent statements unless the cross-examiner has created the inference of, or directly characterized the testimony as, a recent fabrication *(see, People v McClean,*69 NY2d 426, 428). The cross-examination here was an attempt to challenge the reliability of the plaintiff Ann Smith’s account of how the incident in question occurred, but was not an attempt to show that her testimony was a recent fabrication *(see, Fishman v Scheuer,*39 NY2d 502, 504). Sullivan, J. P., Eiber, Rosenblatt and Ritter, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 32.2

                Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C Section 1350,
      as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of  clickNsettle.com,  Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-KSB for the year ended June 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange  Commission  on the  date  hereof  (the  "Form  10-KSB"),  I,  Patricia
Giuliani-Rheaume, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18
U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that;

      (3)   The Form 10-KSB  fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section
            13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m
            or 78o(d)); and

      (4)   The information contained in the Form 10-KSB fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.

Dated: October 3, 2005


/s/ Patricia Giuliani-Rheaume
-------------------------------------------------
Patricia Giuliani-Rheaume - Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and
Treasurer


                                       29
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended
September 30, 2012 (the Report) of Solar Senior Capital Ltd. (the Registrant), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, MICHAEL S. GROSS, the Chief Executive Officer of the Registrant,
hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) The information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.

|      |  |                        
|----- |  | -----------------------
|      | 
|      |  | /S/    MICHAEL S.
GROSS
|Name: |  | Michael S. Gross       
|Date: |  | November 1, 2012
<page>					  EXHIBIT 32.02


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Annual Report of Morgan Stanley Spectrum
Strategic L.P. (the "Partnership") on Form 10-K for the period
ended December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Kevin Perry,
Chief Financial Officer, Demeter Management Corporation, the
general partner of the Partnership, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-
Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

	(1)		The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

	(2)	The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Partnership.








By:	/s/Kevin Perry

Name:	   Kevin Perry
Title:	   Chief Financial Officer

Date:	   March 31, 2005
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Inter-American Foundation

# TIME AND DATE:

September 6, 2018, 11:00 a.m.-12:00 p.m.

# PLACE:

Via tele-conference hosted at Inter-American Foundation, 1331 Pennsylvania Ave. NW, Suite 1200, Washington, DC 20004.

# STATUS:

Meeting of the Board of Directors, Open to the public.

# MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:

    - Commemorating the IAF's 50th Anniversary

# FOR DIAL-IN INFORMATION CONTACT:

Karen Vargas, Executive Assistant, (202) 524-8869.

# CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION:

Paul Zimmerman, General Counsel, (202) 683-7118.

Paul Zimmerman,

General Counsel.

[FR Doc. 2018-19190 Filed 8-30-18; 11:15 am]

 BILLING CODE 7025-01-P
Here's how you know
 **Official websites use .mil** .mil
 **Secure .mil websites use HTTPS** lock () https://


Skip to main content (Press Enter).
 Toggle navigation
                
                Defense Intelligence Agency
                        COMMITTED TO EXCELLENCE IN DEFENSE OF THE NATION
                    Defense Intelligence Agency
            Search
                        Search DIA:
                            Search
                    Search DIA:
                        Search
                        
                        Facilities Operating StatusEmployee Resources
    Home

    About
    
        FAQs

    Organization
        
        Locations

    Missile and Space Intelligence Center

    Joint Military Attache School

    Joint Military Intelligence Training Center

    Office of the Inspector General

    Equal Opportunity & Diversity

    Military Integration Office

    History
        
        DIA Museum

    George Washington Letters

    Directors of DIA

    The Historians

    Patriots Memorial

    Sexual Assault Prevention and Response

    Contact Us

    News & Features
    
        Articles

    Videos

    DIA in the News

    Threat Reports

    Photo Gallery

    No FEAR

    Podcasts

    DIA Comics

    Careers & Opportunities
    
        Career Fields
        
        Analysis

    Counterintelligence

    Finance & Acquisition

    Human Intelligence

    Human Services

    Information Technology

    Inspector General

    Legal

    Mission Management

    Office Management & Infrastructure

    Science & Technology

    Security

    Search Vacancies

    Apply to DIA

    Hiring Process

    Internships

    Veteran Programs

    Business
    
        Contractor Personnel Security

    SIA3

    SITE III

    Innovation

    NeedipeDIA

    Office of Small Business Programs

    Small Business FAQs  HOME About
 Recipient: Choose a RecipientSmall Business ProgramsDIA ENGAGEMENT OPPORTUNITIESSIA 3SITE IIIMILITARY INTEGRATION OFFICEDIA PUBLIC AFFAIRS OFFICEBUSINESS AND CONTRACTING QUESTIONSCONTRACTOR PERSONNEL SECURITYOFFICE OF THE INSPECTOR GENERALEQUAL OPPORTUNITY AND DIVERSITY OFFICEREASONABLE ACCOMMODATIONS TEAMMILITARY EQUAL OPPORTUNITY PMEEO COUNSELORDIA PREPUBLICATION REVIEWSMALL AND DISADVANTAGE  BUSINESS UTILIZATION
 Your Name:
 Your Email Address:
 Subject:
 Message:
 Contact Me: A response is requested.
 **Mailing Address:** Defense Intelligence Agency Office of Corporate Communications (OCC) 7400 Pentagon Washington, DC 20301
 Link Disclaimer
 Web Policy
 No FEAR Act
 DIA Inspector
                                                General
 OPM.gov
 DIA Facility Status
 Equal Opportunity & Diversity
 Employee Resources
 Web Policy & Security
 Defense.gov
 Intel.gov
 FOIA
 Contact Us
 Open GOV
 Site Map
 Back to top
            Upward pointing chevron graphic
 Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil
EXHIBIT 23.1
                                                                   ------------







                    CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the incorporation of our
report included in this Annual Report on Amendment No. 1 to Form 10-K, into the
Company's previously filed registration statements on Form S-3 (File No.'s
333-44367, 333-95333, 333-53656 and 333-73680) and Form S-8 (File No.'s
33-95194, 33-95192, 33-98688, 333-35540, 333-76656 and 333-76658).


                                                   /s/ Arthur Andersen LLP
                                                   -----------------------

Boston, Massachusetts,
January 17, 2002
#### Manufacturers Hanover Trust Company, Respon*1030dent, v John Schultz Construction Company et al., Appellants.

(Appeal No. 2.)

? Appeal unanimously dismissed without costs *(see, Hughes v Nussbaumer, Clarke & Velzy,*140 AD2d 988; *Chase Manhattan Bank v Roberts & Roberts,*63 AD2d 566, 567). (Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Erie County, Rath, Jr., J.—Summary Judgment.) Present—Doerr, J. P., Boomer, Balio, Lawton and Davis, JJ.