# U.S. EPA Data Request

Emissions Test Report

Prepared for:



# Johns Manville

Winder Plant

713 Bankhead Hwy.

Winder, GA 30680

Project No. 11-4191.05

February 22, 2012

BT Environmental Consulting, Inc.

4949 Fernlee Avenue

Royal Oak, Michigan 48073

(248) 548-8070

# Johns Manville Winder BTEC Project No. 11-4191.05

U.S. EPA Emissions Test Report February 22, 2012 i 

# Executive Summary

For the purpose of assisting in the development of any emission standa rd under Section 7412 of

the Clean Air Act (CAA), Section 114 of the CAA gives the United States Environmental

Protection Agency (U.S. EPA) authority to requi re that persons who operate any emission source

“sample such emissions (in accordance with such procedures or methods, at such locations, at

such intervals, during such periods and in such manner as the Administrator shall prescribe)”

. Consistent with this authority, U.S. EPA has re quired that Johns Manville (JM) sample emissions

for the purpose of providing resi dual risk-related data for the National Emission Standards for

Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) for Wool Fiberglass Manufacturing 1



# .

To assist in collecting the ag reed upon data, BT Environmental Consulting, Inc. (BTEC) was

retained by JM to evaluate emission rates of the following pollutants from two exhaust stacks

associated with Lines 105 and 106 located at the JM plant in Winder, Georgia:

• Filterable particulate matter (PM) using U.S. EPA Methods 5/29

• Filterable chromium (FCr) using U.S. EPA Method 29

• Vaporous chromium (VCr) using U.S. EPA Method 29

• Total chromium (TCr) using U.S. EPA Method 29

• Hexavalent chromium (Cr +6 

# ) using SW-846 Method 0061

• TCr using SW-846 Method 0061

Tables I and II on the following page summarize th e overall results of the emissions test program

for Lines 105 and 106, respectively.

1 

# Codified at 40 CFR 63, Subpart NNN

# Johns Manville Winder BTEC Project No. 11-4191.05

U.S. EPA Emissions Test Report February 22, 2012 ii 

# Table I

Overall Emissions Test Results Summary

Line 105

Test Dates: January 25 th 

# and 26 th 

# , 2012

Test Methods Pollutant MDL

used Emission

Rate

(lbs/hour) Emission

Rate

(lbs/ton) Emission

Rate

(mg/dscm)

USEPA

Method 5/29 Filterable PM < 5.8 x 10 -2 

# 4.9 x 10 -1



# Filterable Chromium

(FCr) 3.2 x 10 -5 

# 2.6 x 10 -4



# Vaporous Chromium

(VCr) < 2.8 x 10 -6 

# 2.4 x 10 -5 

# USEPA

Method 29

Total Chromium (TCr) < 3.4 x 10 -5 

# 2.9 x 10 -4



# Hexavalent Chromium

(Cr +6 

# ) < 5.6 x 10 -6 

# 4.9 x 10 -5 

# USEPA

Method 0061 Total Chromium (TCr) < 9.9 x 10 -5 

# 8.7 x 10 -4



# Table II

Overall Emissions Test Results Summary

Line 106

Test Dates: January 23rd and 24th, 2012

Test Methods Pollutant MDL

used Emission

Rate

(lbs/hour) Emission

Rate

(lbs/ton) Emission

Rate

(mg/dscm)

USEPA

Method 5/29 Filterable PM < 1.3 x 10 -2 

# 1.8 x 10 -1



# Filterable Chromium

(FCr) 8.4 x 10 -5 

# 7.3 x 10 -4



# Vaporous Chromium

(VCr) < 3.6 x 10 -6 

# 3.1 x 10 -5 

# USEPA

Method 29

Total Chromium (TCr) < 4.3 x 10 -5 

# 3.7 x 10 -4



# Hexavalent Chromium

(Cr +6 

# ) < 8.5 x 10 -6 

# 7.2 x 10 -5 

# USEPA

Method 0061 Total Chromium (TCr) < 1.6 x 10 -4 

# 1.4 x 10 -3



# Notes: (1) Pollutant emission rates in terms of mg/dscm were not corrected to 7% O 2 

# because exhaust from the

process is essentially ambient (i.e., approximately 20.9% O 2 

# ).

(2) The “less than” symbol (<) included in the table indicates that the emission rate was calculated using the method

detection limit (MDL) value instead of zero because the an alytical result was below the MDL for one or more of the

sample fractions.

# Johns Manville Winder BTEC Project No. 11-4191.05

U.S. EPA Emissions Test Report February 22, 2012 iii 

# TABLE OF CONTENTS

1.0 INTRODUCTION............................................................................................................... 1

2.0 PROCESS DESCRIPTION ............................................................................................... 2

2.1 P ROCESS 

# M ONITORING 

# ....................................................................................................... 2

3.0 SAMPLING AND ANALYTICAL METHODOLOGIES.............................................. 2

3.1 E XHAUST 

# G AS 

# V ELOCITY



# , M OLECULAR 

# W EIGHT



# , AND 

# M OISTURE 

# C ONTENT 

# .................... 2

3.2 PM, FC R



# , VC R



# , AND 

# TC R 

# C ONCENTRATIONS AND 

# E MISSION 

# R ATES 

# ................................. 3

3.3 C R +6 

# AND 

# TC R 

# C ONCENTRATIONS AND 

# E MISSION 

# R ATES 

# ................................................... 3

4.0 TEST RESULTS ................................................................................................................. 3

TABLES

Table 1 –Test Personnel

Table 2 – Line 105 Overall Emi ssion Test Results Summary

Table 3 – Line 106 Overall Emi ssion Test Results Summary

Table 4 – Line 105 Method 0061 Emission Rate Results Summary

Table 5 – Line 105 Method 5/29 Emission Rate Results Summary

Table 6 – Line 106 Method 0061 Emission Rate Results Summary

Table 7 – Line 106 Method 5/29 Emission Rate Results Summary

FIGURES

Figure 1 – Line 106 Exhaust Stack Traverse Point Diagram

Figure 2 – Method 3A Sampli ng Train Schematic Drawing

Figure 3 – Method 5/29 Sampli ng Train Schematic Drawing

Figure 4 – Method 0061 Sampli ng Train Schematic Drawing

APPENDICES

Appendix A – Field and Co mputer Generated Raw Data and Field Notes

Appendix B – Process Data

Appendix C – Equipment Calibration Documents

Appendix D – Laboratory Analytical Reports

# Johns Manville Willows BTEC Project No. 11-4191.05

U.S. EPA Emissions Test Report February 22, 2012 1 

# 1.0 Introduction

For the purpose of assisting in the development of any emission standa rd under Section 7412 of

the Clean Air Act (CAA), Section 114 of the CAA gives the United States Environmental

Protection Agency (U.S. EPA) authority to requi re that persons who operate any emission source

“sample such emissions (in accordance with such procedures or methods, at such locations, at

such intervals, during such periods and in such manner as the Administrator shall prescribe)”

. Consistent with this authority, U.S. EPA has re quired that Johns Manville (JM) sample emissions

for the purpose of providing resi dual risk-related data for the National Emission Standards for

Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) for Wool Fiberglass Manufacturing 2



# .

To assist in collecting the ag reed upon data, BT Environmental Consulting, Inc. (BTEC) was

retained by JM to evaluate emission rates of the following pollutants from two exhaust stacks

associated with Line 105 and 106 located at the JM plan t in Winder, Georgia:

• Filterable particulate matter (PM) using U.S. EPA Methods 5/29

• Filterable chromium (FCr) using U.S. EPA Method 29

• Vaporous chromium (VCr) using U.S. EPA Method 29

• Total chromium (TCr) using U.S. EPA Method 29

• Hexavalent chromium (Cr +6 

# ) using SW-846 Method 0061

• TCr using SW-846 Method 0061

The emissions test program was conducted on January 23 through 26, 2012. The test program

consisted of triplicate emission tests for each parameter. The field sampling portion of the

emissions test program included the personnel summarized by Table 1.

Table 1

Emissions Test Program Personnel

Personnel Affiliation

Jim Sharp BTEC

Paul Molenda BTEC

Paul Draper BTEC

Jeff Peitzsch BTEC

Patti Blevins Johns Manville

2 

# Codified at 40 CFR 63, Subpart NNN

# Johns Manville Willows BTEC Project No. 11-4191.05

U.S. EPA Emissions Test Report February 22, 2012 2 

# 2.0 Process Description

Line 106 electric melters are charged with batch and cullet feeds. The gla ss melt is then sent to

the forming and curing sections. The three me lters in Line 105 all exhaust through a common

baghouse to a single stack. The two melters in Line 106 both exhaust through a common

baghouse to one stack.

2.1 Process Monitoring

Process and control equipment data collected during the emissions test program includes the

following:

(1) Melter Rate (lbs/hr)

(2) Melter dust collector pr essure drop (inches H 2 

# O)

Process production data is availabl e in Appendix B. Control equipm ent data will be available to

U.S. EPA on request.

3.0 Sampling and Analytical Methodologies

Sampling and analytical methodologies for the em issions test program can be separated into

three categories as follows:

(1) Measurement of exhaust gas velocity, mo lecular weight, and moisture content;

(2) Measurement of exhaust gas PM, FCr, VCr, and TCr concentrations and emission rates

using Methods 5/29; and

(3) Measurement of exhaust gas CR +6 

# and TCr concentrations and emission rates using

Method 0061.

Descriptions of sampling and analytical methodologies by cate gory are summarized by Sections

3.1 through 3.3, respectively.

3.1 Exhaust Gas Velocity, Molecular Weight, and Moisture Content

Measurement of exhaust gas velocity, molecula r weight, and moisture content were conducted

using the following reference test methods codifi ed at Title 40, Part 60, Appendix A of the Code

of Federal Regulations (40 CFR 60, Appendix A):

• Method 1 - “Sample and Velocity Trave rses for Stationary Sources”

• Method 2 - “Determination of Stack Gas Velo city and Volumetric Flowrate”

• Method 3A - “Determination of Molecular Weight of Dry Stack Gas”

(Integrated tedlar bags)

• Method 4 - “Determination of Moisture Content in Stack Gases”

These test methods were used to evaluate e xhaust gas flowrates in conjunction with the

isokinetic sampling methodologies.

# Johns Manville Willows BTEC Project No. 11-4191.05

U.S. EPA Emissions Test Report February 22, 2012 3 

# Stack gas velocity traverses we re conducted in accordance with the procedures outlined in

Method 1 and Method 2 (see Figure 1 for a traverse location drawing). An S-type pitot tube with

a thermocouple assembly, calibrated in accordance with Method 2, Section 4.1.1, was used to

measure exhaust gas velocity pressures (using a manometer) and temperatures at each location

during testing. The S-type pito t tube dimensions was within specified limits, therefore, a

baseline pitot tube coefficient of 0.84 (dimensionless) was assigned.

Molecular weight was determined according to USEPA Method 3A, “Determination of Oxygen

and Carbon Dioxide Concentrations in Emi ssions from Stationary Sources”. The O 2 

# content of

the exhaust gas was measured us ing an M&C Products PMA 100-L O 2 

# gas analyzer and the CO 2 

# content of the exhaust gas was measured usi ng a California Analytical Instruments (CAI) 600

Series CO 2 

# gas analyzer. A sample of the gas streamwas drawn through an insulated stainlesssteel probe into a heated sample line. The sample was then connected to sample conditioner to

remove the moisture from the sample before it en tered the analyzers. Data was recorded at 4-

second intervals on a PC equipped with data acquisition software.

Exhaust gas moisture content was evaluated usin g Method 4. Exhaust gas moisture content was

determined gravimetrically.

3.2 

# PM, FCr, VCr, and TCr Concen trations and Emission Rates

PM, FCr, VCr, and TCr concentrations and emi ssion rates were measured using the procedures

of 40 CFR 60, Appendix A, Methods 5 and 29. Se lected metals concentrations and emission

rates were measured using BTEC’s Nutech ® Model 2010 modular isokinetic stack sampling

system. This system consisted of (1) a borosi licate glass or quartz no zzle, (2) a steel probe

w/glass liner, (3) a heated quartz fiber filter assembly, (4) a set of four GS impingers, (5) a

length of sample line, and (6) a Nutech ® control case equipped with a pump, dry gas meter, and

calibrated orifice. Prior to each test, the first two impingers were filled with 100 ml of a 5%

nitric acid (HNO 3 

# )/10% hydrogen peroxide solution, the third impinger was empty, and the

fourth contained approximately 300 g of silica gel desiccant. A schematic drawing of the

PM/metals sampling train is provided as Figure 3.

3.3 Cr +6 

# and TCr Concentrations and Emission Rates

Measurement of Cr +6 

# and TCr concentrations and emissi on rates were measured using the

procedures Method 0061. Cr +6 

# and TCr concentrations and emission rates were measured using

BTEC’s Nutech ® Model 2010 modular isokinetic stack samp ling system. This system consisted

of (1) a glass nozzle, (2) a heated steel probe with a glass probe liner, (4) a Teflon tee with a

recirculating pump, (5) five GS impingers, (6 ) a length of sample line, and (7) a Nutech ® control

case equipped with a pump, dry gas meter, and calibrated orifice. Prior to each test, the first

impinger was filled with 150 mL of 0.1N KOH, the next two were fille d with 75 mL of 0.1 N

KOH, the fourth was empty, and the last impinge r contained approximately 300 g of silica gel

desiccant. A schematic drawing of the Me thod 0061 sampling train is provided as Figure 4.

4.0 Test Results

# Johns Manville Willows BTEC Project No. 11-4191.05

U.S. EPA Emissions Test Report February 22, 2012 4 

# The overall results of the emissions test program for Lines 105 and 106 are summarized by

Tables 2 and 3, respectively.

Table 2

Overall Emissions Test Results Summary

Line 105

Test Dates: January 25 th 

# and 26 th 

# , 2012

Test Methods Pollutant MDL

used Emission

Rate

(lbs/hour) Emission

Rate

(lbs/ton) Emission

Rate

(mg/dscm)

USEPA

Method 5/29 Filterable PM < 5.8 x 10 -2 

# 4.9 x 10 -1



# Filterable Chromium

(FCr) 3.2 x 10 -5 

# 2.6 x 10 -4



# Vaporous Chromium

(VCr) < 2.8 x 10 -6 

# 2.4 x 10 -5 

# USEPA

Method 29

Total Chromium (TCr) < 3.4 x 10 -5 

# 2.9 x 10 -4



# Hexavalent Chromium

(Cr +6 

# ) < 5.6 x 10 -6 

# 4.9 x 10 -5 

# USEPA

Method 0061 Total Chromium (TCr) < 9.9 x 10 -5 

# 8.7 x 10 -4



# Notes: (1) Pollutant emission rates in terms of mg/dscm were not corrected to 7% O 2 

# because exhaust from the

process is essentially ambient (i.e., approximately 20.9% O 2 

# ).

(2) The “less than” symbol (<) included in the table indicates that the emission rate was calculated using the method

detection limit (MDL) value instead of zero because the an alytical result was below the MDL for one or more of the

sample fractions.

# Johns Manville Willows BTEC Project No. 11-4191.05

U.S. EPA Emissions Test Report February 22, 2012 5 

# Table 3

Overall Emissions Test Results Summary

Line 106

Test Dates: January 23 rd 

# and 24 th 

# , 2012

Test Methods Pollutant MDL

used Emission

Rate

(lbs/hour) Emission

Rate

(lbs/ton) Emission

Rate

(mg/dscm)

USEPA

Method 5/29 Filterable PM < 1.3 x 10 -2 

# 1.8 x 10 -1



# Filterable Chromium

(FCr) 8.4 x 10 -5 

# 7.3 x 10 -4



# Vaporous Chromium

(VCr) < 3.6 x 10 -6 

# 3.1 x 10 -5 

# USEPA

Method 29

Total Chromium (TCr) < 4.3 x 10 -5 

# 3.7 x 10 -4



# Hexavalent Chromium

(Cr +6 

# ) < 8.5 x 10 -6 

# 7.2 x 10 -5 

# USEPA

Method 0061 Total Chromium (TCr) < 1.6 x 10 -4 

# 1.4 x 10 -3



# Notes: (1) Pollutant emission rates in terms of mg/dscm were not corrected to 7% O 2 

# because exhaust from the

process is essentially ambient (i.e., approximately 20.9% O 2 

# ).

(2) The “less than” symbol (<) included in the table indicates that the emission rate was calculated using the method

detection limit (MDL) value instead of zero because the an alytical result was below the MDL for one or more of the

sample fractions.



# Detailed results for individual emission test runs are summarized in Tables 3 and 4. Field and

computer-generated data sheets are included in A ppendix A. Process data associated with the

emissions test program is provided in Appe ndix B. Equipment calibration documents are

provided in Appendix C. Labor atory analytical results are available in Appendix D.

# Johns Manville Willows BTEC Project No. 11-4191.05

U.S. EPA Emissions Test Report February 22, 2012 6 

# Limitations

The information and opinions rendered in this re port are exclusively for use by Johns Manville.

BTEC will not distribute or pub lish this report without Johns Manville’s consent except as

required by law or court order. BTEC accepts re sponsibility for the competent performance of

its duties in executing the assignment and prep aring reports in accordance with the normal

standards of the profession, but disclaims a ny responsibility for consequential damages.

This report was prepared by:

Brandon Chase

Staff Environmental Engineer

This report was reviewed by:

Randal J. Tysar

Senior Environmental Engineer

# Tables

# Table 3

Line 89 Melter Dust Collector Method 5/29 Emission Rate Results Summary

Company JM Winder

Source Designation 105

Test Date 1/25/2012 1/26/2012 1/26/2012

Meter/Nozzle Information P-1 P-2 P-3 Average

Meter Temperature Tm (F) 79.8 76.9 87.6 81.4

Meter Pressure - Pm (in. Hg) 30.5 30.3 30.3 30.4

Measured Sample Volume (Vm) 226.6 222.0 231.6 226.7

Sample Volume (Vm-Std ft3) 225.5 220.8 225.8 224.0

Sample Volume (Vm-Std m3) 6.39 6.25 6.39 6.34

Condensate Volume (Vw-std) 3.739 4.885 5.946 4.856

Gas Density (Ps(std) lbs/ft3) (wet) 0.0741 0.0739 0.0739 0.0740

Gas Density (Ps(std) lbs/ft3) (dry) 0.0745 0.0745 0.0746 0.0745

Total weight of sampled gas (m g lbs) (wet) 16.98 16.68 17.13 16.93

Total weight of sampled gas (m g lbs) (dry) 16.80 16.45 16.85 16.70

Nozzle Size - An (sq. ft.) 0.000369 0.000369 0.000369 0.000369

Isokinetic Variation - I 99.8 98.3 100.6 99.6

Production Data

Production Data (lb/hr)

Stack Data

Average Stack Temperature - Ts (F) 114.0 112.7 117.7 114.8

Molecular Weight Stack Gas- dry (Md) 28.83 28.8 28.9 28.8

Molecular Weight Stack Gas-wet (Ms) 28.65 28.6 28.6 28.6

Stack Gas Specific Gravity (Gs) 0.989 0.987 0.987 0.988

Percent Moisture (Bws) 1.63 2.16 2.57 2.12

Water Vapor Volume (fraction) 0.0163 0.0216 0.0257 0.0212

Pressure - Ps ("Hg) 30.3 30.1 30.1 30.1

Average Stack Velocity -Vs (ft/sec) 46.5 46.6 47.2 46.8

Area of Stack (ft2) 12.6 12.6 12.6 12.6

Exhaust Gas Flowrate

Flowrate f t 3 

# ( Actual ) 35,05 8 35,152 35,59 5 35,269

Flowrate f t 3 

# ( Standard Wet ) 32,60 6 32,573 32,69 8 32,62 6

Flowrate f t 3 

# ( Standard Dr y) 32,07 4 31,867 31,86 0 31,93 4

Flowrate m 3 

# ( standard dr y) 90 8 902 902 90 4

Total Particulate Weights (mg)

Acetone Rinse 3.6 1.8 2.5 2.6

Filter < 0.3 < 0.3 < 0.3 0.3

Total < 3.9 < 2.1 < 2.8 2.9

Total Particulate Concentration

lb/1000 lb (wet) < 5.1E-04 < 2.8E-04 < 3.6E-04 3.8E-04

lb/1000 lb (dry) < 5.1E-04 < 2.8E-04 < 3.7E-04 3.9E-04

mg/dscm (dry) < 6.1E-01 < 3.4E-01 < 4.4E-01 4.6E-01

gr/dscf < 2.7E-04 < 1.5E-04 < 1.9E-04 2.0E-04

Total Particulate Emission Rate

lb/ hr < 7.37E-02 < 4.0E-02 < 5.2E-02 5.5E-02

lb/ ton product

Filterable Chromium Weights (ug)

Front Half Chromium (Filterable) 3.26 1.22 0.52 1.67

Filterable Chromium Concentrations

lb/1000 lb (wet) 4.2E-07 1.6E-07 6.7E-08 2.2E-07

lb/1000 lb (dry) 4.3E-07 1.6E-07 6.8E-08 2.2E-07

mg/dscm (dry) 5.1E-04 2.0E-04 8.1E-05 2.6E-04

gr/dscf 2.2E-07 8.5E-08 3.6E-08 1.1E-07

Filterable Chromium Emission Rate

lb/ hr 6.16E-05 2.3E-05 9.7E-06 3.2E-05

lb/ ton product

Vaporous Chromium Weights (ug)

Back Half Chromium (Vaporous) < 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15

Vaporous Chromium Concentrations

lb/1000 lb (wet) < 1.9E-08 2.0E-08 1.9E-08 2.0E-08

lb/1000 lb (dry) < 2.0E-08 2.0E-08 2.0E-08 2.0E-08

mg/dscm (dry) < 2.3E-05 2.4E-05 2.3E-05 2.4E-05

gr/dscf < 1.0E-08 1.0E-08 1.0E-08 1.0E-08

Vaporous Chromium Emission Rate

lb/ hr < 2.8E-06 2.9E-06 2.8E-06 2.8E-06

lb/ ton product

Total Chromium Weights (ug)

Total Chromium < 3.41 1.37 0.67 1.82

Total Chromium Concentrations

lb/1000 lb (wet) < 4.4E-07 1.8E-07 8.6E-08 2.4E-07

lb/1000 lb (dry) < 4.5E-07 1.8E-07 8.8E-08 2.4E-07

mg/dscm (dry) < 5.3E-04 2.2E-04 1.0E-04 2.9E-04

gr/dscf < 2.3E-07 9.6E-08 4.6E-08 1.2E-07

Total Chromium Emission Rate

lb/ hr < 6.44E-05 2.6E-05 1.3E-05 3.4E-05

lb/ ton product

# Table 4

Line 105 Method 0061 Emission Rate Results Summary

Company JM Winder

Source Designation 105

Test Date 1/25/2012 1/26/2012 1/26/2012

Meter/Nozzle Information P-1 P-2 P-3 Average

Meter Temperature Tm (F) 71.5 74.3 77.2 74.3

Meter Pressure - Pm (in. Hg) 30.5 30.3 30.3 30.3

Measured Sample Volume (Vm) 223.9 225.0 196.6 215.2

Sample Volume (Vm-Std ft3) 227.0 225.5 195.8 216.1

Sample Volume (Vm-Std m3) 6.43 6.39 5.55 6.12

Condensate Volume (Vw-std) 5.375 5.427 5.686 5.496

Gas Density (Ps(std) lbs/ft3) (wet) 0.0740 0.0740 0.0738 0.0739

Gas Density (Ps(std) lbs/ft3) (dry) 0.0746 0.0746 0.0746 0.0746

Total weight of sampled gas (m g lbs) (wet) 17.19 17.08 14.88 16.38

Total weight of sampled gas (m g lbs) (dry) 16.94 16.83 14.61 16.13

Nozzle Size - An (sq. ft.) 0.000369 0.000369 0.000369 0.000369

Isokinetic Variation - I 100.5 100.4 100.6 100.5

Production Data

Production Data (lb/hr)

Stack Data

Average Stack Temperature - Ts (F) 116.0 114.1 110.4 113.5

Oxygen Concentration (%) 20.6 20.6 20.6

Molecular Weight Stack Gas- dry (Md) 28.9 28.9 28.9 28.9

Molecular Weight Stack Gas-wet (Ms) 28.6 28.6 28.6 28.6

Stack Gas Specific Gravity (Gs) 0.988 0.988 0.986 0.988

Percent Moisture (Bws) 2.31 2.35 2.82 2.49

Water Vapor Volume (fraction) 0.0231 0.0235 0.0282 0.0249

Pressure - Ps ("Hg) 30.3 30.1 30.1 30.1

Average Stack Velocity -Vs (ft/sec) 47.0 46.9 40.6 44.8

Area of Stack (ft2) 12.6 12.6 12.6 12.6

Exhaust Gas Flowrate

Flowrate ft 3 

# (Actual) 35,41 6 35,32 3 30,56 9 33,76 9

Flowrate ft 3 

# (Standard Wet) 32,827 32,65 4 28,43 9 31,307

Flowrate ft 3 

# (Standard Dry) 32,067 31,88 6 27,637 30,53 0

Flowrate m 3 

# (standard dry) 908 90 3 78 3 86 5

Total Hexavalent Chromium Weight (ug)

Hexavalent Chromium < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 0.30

Total Hexavalent Chromium Concentration

lb/1000 lb (wet) < 3.8E-08 < 3.9E-08 < 4.4E-08 4.1E-08

lb/1000 lb (dry) < 3.9E-08 < 3.9E-08 < 4.5E-08 4.1E-08

mg/dscm (dry) < 4.7E-05 < 4.7E-05 < 5.4E-05 4.9E-05

Total Hexavalent Chromium Emission Rate

lb/ hr < 5.6E-06 < 5.6E-06 < 5.6E-06 5.6E-06

lb/ ton product

Total Chromium Weight (ug)

Back Half Chromiu m < 4.00 < 4.00 < 4.00 4.00

Front Half Chromium 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 0.30

Rinse Chromium < 1.00 < 1.00 < 1.00

Total Chromium < 5.30 < 5.30 < 5.30 5.30

Total Chromium Concentration

lb/1000 lb (wet) < 6.8E-07 < 6.8E-07 < 7.9E-07 7.2E-07

lb/1000 lb (dry) < 6.9E-07 < 6.9E-07 < 8.0E-07 7.3E-07

mg/dscm (dry) < 8.2E-04 < 8.3E-04 < 9.6E-04 8.7E-04

Total Chromium Emission Rate

lb/ hr < 9.9E-05 < 9.9E-05 < 9.9E-05 9.9E-05

lb/ ton product

# Table 6

Line 106 Method 0061 Emission Rate Results Summary

Company JM Winder

Source Designation 106

Test Date 1/23/2012 1/24/2012 1/24/2012

Meter/Nozzle Information P-1 P-2 P-3 Average

Meter Temperature Tm (F) 59.2 76.6 83.8 73.2

Meter Pressure - Pm (in. Hg) 30.0 30.3 30.3 30.2

Measured Sample Volume (Vm) 170.2 173.6 173.6 172.5

Sample Volume (Vm-Std ft3) 174.0 173.2 171.0 172.7

Sample Volume (Vm-Std m3) 4.93 4.90 4.84 4.89

Condensate Volume (Vw-std) 3.711 3.711 0.000 2.474

Gas Density (Ps(std) lbs/ft3) (wet) 0.0739 0.0739 0.0745 0.0741

Gas Density (Ps(std) lbs/ft3) (dry) 0.0745 0.0745 0.0745 0.0745

Total weight of sampled gas (m g lbs) (wet) 13.14 13.07 12.74 12.98

Total weight of sampled gas (m g lbs) (dry) 12.96 12.90 12.74 12.87

Nozzle Size - An (sq. ft.) 0.000369 0.000369 0.000369 0.000369

Isokinetic Variation - I 100.0 100.1 98.4 99.5

Production Data

Production Data (lb/hr)

Stack Data

Average Stack Temperature - Ts (F) 121.4 124.7 132.4 126.2

Oxygen Concentration (%) 20.6 20.6 20.6

Molecular Weight Stack Gas- dry (Md) 28.8 28.8 28.8 28.8

Molecular Weight Stack Gas-wet (Ms) 28.6 28.6 28.8 28.7

Stack Gas Specific Gravity (Gs) 0.988 0.988 0.995 0.990

Percent Moisture (Bws) 2.09 2.10 0.00 1.40

Water Vapor Volume (fraction) 0.0209 0.0210 0.0000 0.0140

Pressure - Ps ("Hg) 29.9 30.2 30.2 30.1

Average Stack Velocity -Vs (ft/sec) 36.8 36.5 36.4 36.6

Area of Stack (ft2) 15.9 15.9 15.9 15.9

Exhaust Gas Flowrate

Flowrate ft 3 

# (Actual) 35,11 4 34,84 1 34,68 5 34,88 0

Flowrate ft 3 

# (Standard Wet) 31,91 3 31,74 9 31,197 31,62 0

Flowrate ft 3 

# (Standard Dry) 31,247 31,08 3 31,197 31,17 5

Flowrate m 3 

# (standard dry) 88 5 88 0 88 3 88 3

Total Hexavalent Chromium Weight (ug)

Hexavalent Chromium 0.36 < 0.40 < 0.30 0.35

Total Hexavalent Chromium Concentration

lb/1000 lb (wet) 6.0E-08 < 6.7E-08 < 5.2E-08 6.0E-08

lb/1000 lb (dry) 6.1E-08 < 6.8E-08 < 5.2E-08 6.0E-08

mg/dscm (dry) 7.3E-05 < 8.2E-05 < 6.2E-05 7.2E-05

Total Hexavalent Chromium Emission Rate

lb/ hr 8.6E-06 < 9.5E-06 < 7.3E-06 8.5E-06

lb/ ton product

Total Chromium Weight (ug)

Back Half Chromiu m < 4.00 < 5.00 < 4.00 4.33

Front Half Chromium < 0.30 < 0.30 0.90 0.50

Rinse Chromium < 2.00 < 2.00 < 2.00

Total Chromium < 6.30 < 7.30 < 6.90 6.83

Total Chromium Concentration

lb/1000 lb (wet) < 1.1E-06 < 1.2E-06 < 1.2E-06 1.2E-06

lb/1000 lb (dry) < 1.1E-06 < 1.2E-06 < 1.2E-06 1.2E-06

mg/dscm (dry) < 1.3E-03 < 1.5E-03 < 1.4E-03 1.4E-03

Total Chromium Emission Rate

lb/ hr < 1.5E-04 < 1.7E-04 < 1.7E-04 1.6E-04

lb/ ton product

# Table 7

Line 106 Method 5/29 Emission Rate Results Summary

Company JM Winder

Source Designation 106

Test Date 1/23/2012 1/24/2012 1/24/2012

Meter/Nozzle Information P-1 P-2 P-3 Average

Meter Temperature Tm (F) 64.5 84.7 96.6 82.0

Meter Pressure - Pm (in. Hg) 30.1 30.3 30.3 30.2

Measured Sample Volume (Vm) 174.9 173.7 177.4 175.4

Sample Volume (Vm-Std ft3) 176.8 170.1 170.1 172.3

Sample Volume (Vm-Std m3) 5.01 4.82 4.82 4.88

Condensate Volume (Vw-std) 3.145 3.112 2.150 2.802

Gas Density (Ps(std) lbs/ft3) (wet) 0.0740 0.0740 0.0742 0.0741

Gas Density (Ps(std) lbs/ft3) (dry) 0.0745 0.0745 0.0745 0.0745

Total weight of sampled gas (m g lbs) (wet) 13.32 12.82 12.77 12.97

Total weight of sampled gas (m g lbs) (dry) 13.17 12.68 12.67 12.84

Nozzle Size - An (sq. ft.) 0.000369 0.000369 0.000369 0.000369

Isokinetic Variation - I 101.2 99.9 99.4 100.2

Production Data

Production Data (lb/hr)

Stack Data

Average Stack Temperature - Ts (F) 120.0 123.0 131.8 124.9

Molecular Weight Stack Gas- dry (Md) 28.8 28.8 28.8 28.8

Molecular Weight Stack Gas-wet (Ms) 28.6 28.6 28.7 28.7

Stack Gas Specific Gravity (Gs) 0.989 0.989 0.991 0.989

Percent Moisture (Bws) 1.75 1.80 1.25 1.60

Water Vapor Volume (fraction) 0.0175 0.0180 0.0125 0.0160

Pressure - Ps ("Hg) 30.0 30.2 30.2 30.1

Average Stack Velocity -Vs (ft/sec) 36.7 35.8 36.2 36.2

Area of Stack (ft2) 15.9 15.9 15.9 15.9

Exhaust Gas Flowrate

Flowrate f t 3 

# ( Actual ) 34,99 1 34,099 34,562 34,55 0

Flowrate f t 3 

# ( Standard Wet ) 31,94 4 31,163 31,11 6 31,40 8

Flowrate f t 3 

# ( Standard Dr y) 31,38 6 30,60 4 30,72 8 30,90 6

Flowrate m 3 

# ( standard dr y) 889 867 87 0 87 5

Total Particulate Weights (mg)

Acetone Rinse 3.4 2.7 6.0 4.0

Filter < 0.3 < 0.3 < 0.3 0.3

Total < 3.7 < 3.0 < 6.3 4.3

Total Particulate Concentration

lb/1000 lb (wet) < 6.1E-04 < 5.2E-04 < 1.1E-03 7.4E-04

lb/1000 lb (dry) < 6.2E-04 < 5.2E-04 < 1.1E-03 7.5E-04

mg/dscm (dry) < 7.4E-01 < 6.2E-01 < 1.3E+00 8.9E-01

gr/dscf < 3.2E-04 < 2.7E-04 < 5.7E-04 3.9E-04

Total Particulate Emission Rate

lb/ hr < 8.7E-02 < 7.2E-02 < 1.5E-01 1.0E-01

lb/ ton product

Filterable Chromium Weights (ug)

Front Half Chromium (Filterable) 1.78 6.11 2.67 3.52

Filterable Chromium Concentrations

lb/1000 lb (wet) 2.9E-07 1.1E-06 4.6E-07 6.0E-07

lb/1000 lb (dry) 3.0E-07 1.1E-06 4.6E-07 6.1E-07

mg/dscm (dry) 3.6E-04 1.3E-03 5.5E-04 7.3E-04

gr/dscf 1.6E-07 5.5E-07 2.4E-07 3.2E-07

Filterable Chromium Emission Rate

lb/ hr 4.2E-05 1.5E-04 6.4E-05 8.4E-05

lb/ ton product

Vaporous Chromium Weights (ug)

Back Half Chromium (Vaporous) < 0.15 < 0.15 < 0.15 0.15

Vaporous Chromium Concentrations

lb/1000 lb (wet) < 2.5E-08 < 2.6E-08 < 2.6E-08 2.6E-08

lb/1000 lb (dry) < 2.5E-08 < 2.6E-08 < 2.6E-08 2.6E-08

mg/dscm (dry) < 3.0E-05 < 3.1E-05 < 3.1E-05 3.1E-05

gr/dscf < 1.3E-08 < 1.4E-08 < 1.4E-08 1.3E-08

Vaporous Chromium Emission Rate

lb/ hr < 3.5E-06 < 3.6E-06 < 3.6E-06 3.6E-06

lb/ ton product

Total Chromium Weights (ug)

Total Chromium < 1.93 < 6.26 < 2.82 3.67

Total Chromium Concentrations

lb/1000 lb (wet) < 3.2E-07 < 1.1E-06 < 4.9E-07 6.3E-07

lb/1000 lb (dry) < 3.2E-07 < 1.1E-06 < 4.9E-07 6.3E-07

mg/dscm (dry) < 3.9E-04 < 1.3E-03 < 5.9E-04 7.6E-04

gr/dscf < 1.7E-07 < 5.7E-07 < 2.6E-07 3.3E-07

Total Chromium Emission Rate

lb/ hr < 4.5E-05 < 1.5E-04 < 6.8E-05 8.8E-05

lb/ ton product

# Figures

# Diameter:

54.00 in

Points Distance "

12 1.1

11 3.6

10 6.4

9 9.6

8 13.5

7 19.2

6 34.8

5 40.5

4 44.4

3 47.6

2 50.4

1 52.9

Site:

Johns Manville

Winder, GA

Line 106 Melter 

# Figure 1

BT Environmental Consulting, Inc.

4949 Fernlee

Royal Oak, Michigan 48073 Not to Scale <0.5 diameters

<2 diameters

# Bags Samples

to analyzers



# Figure 2

Site:

USEPA Method 3A

Johns Manville

Winder, Georgia BT Environmental Consulting,

Inc.

4949 Fernlee

Royal Oak, Michigan 48073

Data Acquisition System



# Calibration Gases

(Fed to Probe Tip) Environics Gas

Dilution System M&C Model 100-L

O

2 

# Analyzer CAI Series 600

CO

2 

# Analyzer pump tedlar

bagFigure 3Site:USEPA Methods 5/29Johns ManvilleWinder, GeorgiaBT Environmental Consulting Inc.4949 Fernlee Royal OakMichigan 48073PumpSilica gel100 mL 5% HNO3 / 10% H2O2 solutionHeated Filter BoxS-Type Pitot w/ ThermocoupleHeated Probe w/ Glass Liner & NozzleMeter RigTemp.ProbeFilterOnOff-+00:001 2 3 4 5Figure 4Site:USEPA Method 0061Johns ManvilleWinder, GeorgiaBT Environmental Consulting, Inc.4949 FernleeRoyal Oak, Michigan 48073PumpMeter RigTemp.ProbeFilterOnOff-+00:001 2 3 4 5150 mL 0.1 N KOHEmptySilica GelPerastaltic pumpTeflon tee75 mL 0.1 N KOH

# Appendix A

Field and Computer Generate d Raw Data and Field NotesCompanyJM WinderSource Designation105Test Date1/25/2012Assumed Moisture (Bws)2Test Number1Condensate Volume (Vlc)58.3OperatorPMSilica Gel Weight Gain (Vlc)21Filter Number11121405Nozzle Diameter (in.)0.26Barometric Pressure (Pb)30.29Leak Rate Initial.000@10"'Stack Static Pressure (Pg)-0.52Leak Rate Final.001@10"Stack Dimensions 1 (in.)48Traverse points24*Stack Dimensions 2 (in.)Pitot Corr. Factor (Cp)0.84Pitot Tube Number5ft BMeter Corr. Factor (Y)0.998Meter NumberMB 3Orsat Results (%)Meter Isokinetic Factor (Kiso)CO20.03Delta∆H@1.77O220.57Traverse Sampling Time Sampling Stack Temp.Velocity Pres.Desired Orifice Actual OrificeSample VolumeDry Gas Meter Temp. Last Impinger Probe Filter Box Expected IsokineticPoint (Minutes) Clock Time Train Vac. (F) ("H2O) Differential Differential (cubic feet) Inlet Outlet Temperature Temperature Temperature DGM VariationNumber ø (24 hour) ("Hg) Ts∆Ps ("H2O)∆H ("H2O)∆H Vm (F) Tm (F) Tm (F)(F)(F) (cubic feet) %10 9:48 0 110 0.56 2.44 2.35 184.90 54 53 52250251 189.13 100.1253 110 0.56 2.44 2.35 189.14 62 54 52248251 193.41 99.93103 110 0.57 2.49 2.40 193.41 64 56 53247248 197.73 100.34153 110 0.57 2.49 2.41 197.75 68 58 53252251 202.10 100.05203 110 0.61 2.66 2.59 202.10 70 59 57251251 206.61 100.06253 110 0.61 2.66 2.60 206.61 72 61 61250249 211.14 99.87304 111 0.65 2.84 2.78 211.13 73 62 62248249 215.81 100.38354 111 0.65 2.84 2.78 215.82 75 63 63248251 220.51 100.29404 111 0.71 3.10 3.05 220.52 76 65 65249251 225.44 100.110454 111 0.71 3.10 3.05 225.44 78 67 64247250 230.38 99.911504 111 0.73 3.18 3.15 230.37 79 68 64248250 235.39 100.212554 111 0.73 3.18 1.15 235.39 81 69 63250249 240.42 99.813604 111 0.70 3.05 3.05 240.43 82 71 62252249 245.37 99.914654 111 0.70 3.05 3.04 245.36 83 72 62253251 250.31 100.115704 111 0.65 2.84 2.84 250.31 84 73 61250252 255.09 100.116754 111 0.65 2.84 2.84 255.09 86 75 60250251 259.89 100.417804 111 0.61 2.66 2.68 259.90 86 76 60248250 264.55 100.018854 111 0.61 2.66 2.68 264.55 87 77 59247251 269.21 100.019904 113 0.57 2.49 2.52 269.21 87 78 59248250 273.71 99.820954 113 0.57 2.49 2.51 273.70 87 79 59247251 278.20 100.3211004 114 0.55 2.40 2.44 278.22 87 79 60249250 282.64 100.4221054 114 0.55 2.40 2.43 282.66 88 80 60250251 287.09 100.0231103 114 0.54 2.36 2.40 287.09 88 80 61250250 291.48 100.0241153 114 0.54 2.36 2.40 291.48 88 80 62247249 295.87 100.0120 11:48295.871120 11:53 3 114 0.60 2.62 2.68 295.87 83 80 60252250 300.47 99.921253 115 0.60 2.62 2.68 300.47 87 81 61249251 305.09 100.231303 115 0.61 2.66 2.73 305.10 88 81 61247250 309.76 100.241353 116 0.61 2.66 2.73 309.77 89 81 62250250 314.43 100.251404 116 0.67 2.92 3.01 314.44 89 82 62248251 319.33 100.061454 116 0.67 2.92 3.00 319.33 90 82 62250249 324.23 100.271504 116 0.69 3.01 3.11 324.23 90 82 63252250 329.20 100.381554 116 0.69 3.01 3.11 329.21 90 83 63250250 334.18 100.291604 116 0.74 3.23 3.35 334.19 90 83 63248249 339.34 100.4101654 116 0.74 3.23 3.34 339.35 90 82 63247249 344.50 100.2111704 116 0.77 3.36 3.49 344.50 90 83 64250251 349.76 100.1121754 116 0.77 3.36 3.49 349.75 90 82 63250250 355.00 100.4131804 116 0.74 3.23 3.36 355.01 90 83 64248251 360.16 100.4141854 117 0.74 3.23 3.36 360.17 90 83 63247250 365.32 100.2151904 117 0.71 3.10 3.24 365.32 91 83 63249249 370.37 100.2161954 117 0.71 3.11 3.24 370.37 91 83 64250249 375.42 100.6172004 117 0.65 2.85 2.97 375.44 90 83 63250250 380.26 100.0182054 118 0.65 2.85 2.97 380.26 89 83 64247251 385.08 100.2192104 118 0.57 2.50 2.61 385.08 89 82 63246251 389.59 99.9202154 118 0.57 2.51 2.61 389.58 89 83 64247251 394.09 100.2212204 118 0.55 2.42 2.53 394.10 89 82 64250250 398.53 100.1222254 118 0.55 2.42 2.53 398.53 89 83 64253250 402.96 100.0232304 118 0.51 2.25 2.35 402.96 89 83 65250251 407.23 100.8242354 118 0.51 2.25 2.35 407.26 89 83 64250250 411.53 100.1240 13:53411.53Average 240114.0 0.64 2.78 2.78 226.630 83.9 75.6 61.4 249.1 250.2 299.7 100.179.76CompanyJM WinderSource Designation105Test Date1/26/2012Assumed Moisture (Bws)2Test Number2Condensate Volume (Vlc)53OperatorPMSilica Gel Weight Gain (Vlc)50.6Filter Number11121407Nozzle Diameter (in.)0.26Barometric Pressure (Pb)30.11Leak Rate Initial.001@10"Stack Static Pressure (Ps)-0.52Leak Rate Final.000@8"Stack Dimensions 1 (in.)48Traverse points24*Stack Dimensions 2 (in.)Pitot Corr. Factor (Cp)0.84Pitot Tube Number5ft BMeter Corr. Factor (Y)0.998Meter NumberMB 3Orsat Results (%)Meter Isokinetic Factor (Kiso)CO20.03Delta∆H@1.77O220.57Traverse Sampling Time Sampling Stack Temp.Velocity Pres.Desired Orifice OrificeSample VolumeDry Gas Meter Temp. Last Impinger Probe Filter Box Expected IsokineticPoint (Minutes) Clock Time Train Vac. (F) ("H2O) Differential Differential (cubic feet) Inlet Outlet Temperature Temperature Temperature DGM VariationNumber ø (24 hour) ("Hg) Ts∆Ps ("H2O)∆H ("H2O)∆H Vm (F) Tm (F) Tm (F)(F)(F) (cubic feet) %10 7:56 0 110 0.54 2.35 2.26 411.40 53 53 51250251 415.56 99.8255 110 0.54 2.35 2.26 415.56 60 56 50250249 419.77 100.03105 110 0.55 2.40 2.32 419.77 63 57 51247249 424.03 99.94155 111 0.55 2.40 2.32 424.03 67 58 51247251 428.31 99.85205 111 0.64 2.80 2.72 428.30 69 60 52249250 432.93 100.06256 113 0.64 2.80 2.72 432.93 71 61 53247250 437.57 100.17306 113 0.68 2.98 2.91 437.57 73 62 53250251 442.36 99.88356 113 0.68 2.98 2.91 442.35 74 64 53249250 447.16 100.29406 113 0.70 3.07 3.01 447.16 75 64 55248251 452.04 99.910456 113 0.70 3.08 3.01 452.03 76 66 56249251 456.93 100.211506 113 0.73 3.21 3.15 456.93 77 67 57249250 461.94 100.012556 113 0.73 3.22 3.15 461.93 78 68 58251250 466.95 100.013606 113 0.71 3.13 3.08 466.94 79 69 58253250 471.90 100.614656 113 0.71 3.13 3.08 471.92 80 70 60252251 476.89 100.015706 112 0.69 3.05 3.01 476.88 80 71 59251250 481.79 100.216756 112 0.69 3.05 3.00 481.79 81 71 59251250 486.70 99.917806 112 0.66 2.92 2.89 486.69 81 72 60249252 491.50 100.118856 113 0.66 2.93 2.88 491.50 82 73 61252249 496.31 100.019906 113 0.65 2.89 2.86 496.31 82 73 60251250 501.09 100.020956 113 0.65 2.89 2.85 501.08 83 74 61251250 505.86 99.8211006 113 0.56 2.49 2.46 505.85 83 74 60251251 510.29 100.4221055 113 0.56 2.50 2.46 510.31 83 75 60249250 514.75 100.3231105 113 0.55 2.45 2.43 514.77 83 75 61249249 519.17 100.1241155 113 0.55 2.46 2.43 519.18 83 75 61251251 523.58 99.9120 9:56523.581120 10:01 0 112 0.53 2.37 2.36 523.58 78 76 58252250 527.89 100.421255 112 0.53 2.38 2.35 527.91 80 75 60247249 532.23 100.331305 113 0.55 2.47 2.45 532.24 82 76 60249251 536.64 100.341355 113 0.55 2.47 2.45 536.66 83 76 57249250 541.07 100.051405 113 0.60 2.70 2.68 541.07 83 76 57249250 545.67 100.661455 113 0.60 2.70 2.68 545.70 84 76 57250250 550.31 100.371505 113 0.64 2.88 2.87 550.32 84 77 56251249 555.08 100.481556 113 0.64 2.89 2.87 555.10 85 77 58249250 559.87 100.191606 113 0.71 3.21 3.20 559.87 86 78 59251250 564.90 100.3101656 113 0.71 3.21 3.20 564.91 86 78 58250251 569.94 100.1111706 113 0.75 3.40 3.38 569.94 86 78 59248248 575.11 100.5121756 113 0.75 3.40 3.39 575.13 87 79 58248249 580.31 100.4131806 114 0.77 3.49 3.49 580.32 87 79 58248251 585.57 100.1141856 114 0.77 3.50 3.48 585.56 88 80 60249250 590.82 100.3151906 114 0.73 3.32 3.32 590.82 88 80 60249249 595.94 100.6161956 114 0.73 3.32 3.32 595.96 88 80 59249250 601.08 100.2172006 113 0.65 2.96 2.95 601.08 88 80 60251251 605.91 100.7182056 113 0.65 2.97 2.96 605.94 89 81 60252250 610.78 100.3192106 113 0.61 2.79 2.79 610.79 89 81 60250249 615.48 100.0202156 113 0.61 2.79 2.78 615.48 89 81 61249251 620.17 100.0212206 113 0.55 2.52 2.52 620.17 89 81 60251250 624.62 100.1222256 113 0.55 2.52 2.52 624.63 89 82 61251250 629.09 100.0232305 113 0.51 2.34 2.34 629.09 89 82 61249251 633.38 99.9242355 113 0.51 2.34 2.34 633.38 89 82 61251250 637.67 -8673.9240 12:09260.840Average 240112.7 0.64 2.84 2.81 221.980 81 73 58250250526-8376.89CompanyJM WinderSource Designation105Test Date1/26/2012Assumed Moisture (Bws)2Test Number3Condensate Volume (Vlc)78.6OperatorPMSilica Gel Weight Gain (Vlc)47.5Filter Number11081871Nozzle Diameter (in.)0.26Barometric Pressure (Pb)30.11Leak Rate Initial.000@10"Stack Static Pressure (Ps)-0.52Leak Rate Final.000@10"Stack Dimensions 1 (in.)48Traverse points24*Stack Dimensions 2 (in.)Pitot Corr. Factor (Cp)0.84Pitot Tube Number5ft BMeter Corr. Factor (Y)0.998Meter NumberMB 3Orsat Results (%)Meter Isokinetic Factor (Kiso)CO20.3Delta∆H@1.77O220.57Traverse Sampling Time Sampling Stack Temp.Velocity Pres.Desired Orifice OrificeSample VolumeDry Gas Meter Temp. Last Impinger Probe Filter Box Expected IsokineticPoint (Minutes) Clock Time Train Vac. (F) ("H2O) Differential Differential (cubic feet) Inlet Outlet Temperature Temperature Temperature DGM VariationNumber ø (24 hour) ("Hg) Ts∆Ps ("H2O)∆H ("H2O)∆H Vm (F) Tm (F) Tm (F)(F)(F) (cubic feet) %10 12:47 0 109 0.54 2.37 2.37 638.09 77 77 54249252 642.45 100.6253 109 0.54 2.37 2.37 642.48 79 78 57252252 646.85 100.13103 110 0.55 2.42 2.42 646.86 81 78 56251253 651.28 100.04153 110 0.55 2.42 2.42 651.28 83 78 52252250 655.70 99.85203 111 0.58 2.55 2.56 655.70 87 78 53249250 660.26 100.16253 113 0.58 2.55 2.56 660.26 85 78 53249251 664.80 100.67303 114 0.61 2.68 2.70 664.83 86 79 53252251 669.49 100.08353 115 0.61 2.68 2.70 669.49 87 79 54253250 674.15 100.49403 116 0.68 2.99 3.02 674.17 87 79 54251250 679.09 100.210453 116 0.68 2.99 3.01 679.09 87 80 54251250 684.01 99.911503 117 0.72 3.17 3.20 684.00 88 80 54251250 689.06 100.312554 117 0.72 3.17 3.20 689.07 89 81 55251250 694.14 100.313604 117 0.75 3.30 3.34 694.15 89 81 55248251 699.33 100.014654 117 0.75 3.30 3.33 699.32 90 82 56248250 704.51 100.015704 117 0.70 3.08 3.12 704.50 90 82 57250250 709.51 100.716754 117 0.70 3.08 3.12 709.54 90 82 57250250 714.55 100.317804 117 0.68 2.99 3.04 714.56 91 83 58249250 719.51 100.518854 118 0.68 2.99 3.04 719.53 91 83 58251250 724.47 100.019904 118 0.65 2.86 2.92 724.47 92 84 58251249 729.31 100.220953 119 0.65 2.86 2.92 729.32 92 84 58249250 734.16 100.5211003 118 0.61 2.68 2.74 734.18 93 85 58249251 738.88 100.0221053 118 0.61 2.68 2.74 738.88 94 86 58250250 743.59 100.1231103 118 0.57 2.51 2.57 743.59 94 86 59251251 748.14 100.4241153 118 0.57 2.51 2.57 748.16 94 86 59250250 752.71 99.7120 14:47752.701120 14:52 0 120 0.60 2.64 2.73 752.70 89 87 62252251 757.34 100.621253 120 0.60 2.64 2.73 757.37 92 87 60251250 762.03 99.631303 120 0.61 2.68 2.77 762.01 93 87 60249250 766.71 100.041353 120 0.61 2.68 2.76 766.71 93 87 60248250 771.41 100.251404 120 0.68 2.99 3.09 771.42 93 87 59251250 776.38 100.361454 120 0.68 2.99 3.09 776.39 93 87 61249250 781.35 100.371504 119 0.69 3.03 3.15 781.36 93 87 61250250 786.36 100.381554 119 0.69 3.03 3.15 786.37 93 87 61250249 791.37 100.191604 119 0.73 3.21 3.34 791.37 93 87 62251250 796.52 100.2101654 119 0.73 3.21 3.33 796.52 93 87 62250249 801.67 100.4111704 120 0.76 3.34 3.47 801.68 94 87 61249250 806.93 100.2121754 120 0.76 3.34 3.48 806.93 94 87 63250251 812.18 100.4131804 120 0.74 3.25 3.40 812.19 94 87 63251251 817.37 100.3141854 120 0.74 3.26 3.39 817.38 95 87 64251249 822.57 100.2151904 120 0.71 3.13 3.27 822.57 95 88 63249250 827.65 100.3161954 120 0.71 3.13 3.27 827.66 95 88 63251249 832.74 100.1172004 121 0.65 2.87 3.00 832.74 96 88 63251250 837.61 100.2182054 121 0.65 2.87 2.99 837.61 96 88 62249250 842.48 99.8192104 121 0.61 2.70 2.81 842.46 96 88 62249250 847.17 100.6202153 121 0.61 2.70 2.81 847.20 95 88 62251252 851.91 100.1212203 120 0.56 2.49 2.59 851.91 94 88 61251251 856.42 99.9222253 120 0.56 2.49 2.59 856.42 94 88 61250250 860.93 100.4232303 120 0.52 2.31 2.41 860.95 94 88 61249249 865.30 99.8242353 120 0.52 2.32 2.41 865.29 93 88 61250250 869.63 100.1240 16:52869.64Average 240117.7 0.65 2.84 2.92 231.550 91.0 84.3 58.7 250.2 250.3 755.7 100.287.64CompanyJM WinderSource Designation105Test Date1/25/2012Assumed Moisture (Bws)2Test Number1Condensate Volume (Vlc)53.1OperatorJPSilica Gel Weight Gain (Vlc)60.9Filter NumberNozzle Diameter (in.)0.26Barometric Pressure (Pb)30.29Leak Rate Initial0.000 @ 10"Stack Static Pressure (Pg)-0.52Leak Rate Final0.000 @ 6"Stack Dimensions 1 (in.)48Traverse points24*Stack Dimensions 2 (in.)Pitot Corr. Factor (Cp)0.84Pitot Tube Number5 ft CMeter Corr. Factor (Y)1.002Meter NumberMB 5Orsat Results (%)Meter Isokinetic Factor (Kiso)CO20.3Delta∆H@1.55O220.57Traverse Sampling Time Sampling Stack Temp.Velocity Pres.Desired Orifice Actual OrificeSample VolumeDry Gas Meter Temp. Last Impinger Probe Filter Box Filter Box Exit Expected IsokineticPoint (Minutes) Clock Time Train Vac. (F) ("H2O) Differential Differential (cubic feet) Inlet Outlet Temperature Temperature Temperature Temperature DGM VariationNumber ø (24 hour) ("Hg) Ts∆Ps ("H2O)∆H ("H2O)∆H Vm (F) Tm (F) Tm (F)(F)(F)(F) (cubic feet) %10 9:48 3.5 111 0.62 2.33 2.25 253.37 51 50 56NANANA 257.77 99.5253.5 112 0.62 2.33 2.26 257.75 55 51 52NANANA 262.17 99.53103.5 112 0.63 2.37 2.31 262.15 58 51 52NANANA 266.62 100.64153.5 112 0.63 2.37 2.31 266.65 61 52 53NANANA 271.14 99.85204 113 0.67 2.52 2.47 271.13 63 53 55NANANA 275.77 99.86254 113 0.67 2.53 2.47 275.76 65 54 58NANANA 280.41 100.47304 113 0.68 2.57 2.52 280.43 68 55 60NANANA 285.14 100.88354 113 0.68 2.57 2.52 285.17 70 57 61NANANA 289.89 99.69404 113 0.72 2.72 2.68 289.87 72 58 63NANANA 294.75 100.410454 113 0.72 2.73 2.69 294.76 73 59 63NANANA 299.64 101.011504 114 0.76 2.88 2.84 299.69 75 61 63NANANA 304.72 100.712554 114 0.76 2.88 2.85 304.75 76 62 63NANANA 309.79 100.113604 114 0.72 2.74 2.71 309.79 77 63 63NANANA 314.71 100.214654 115 0.72 2.74 2.71 314.71 79 65 63NANANA 319.64 100.515704 115 0.68 2.59 2.57 319.66 80 66 63NANANA 324.46 100.516754 115 0.68 2.59 2.57 324.48 80 67 61NANANA 329.29 100.017804 115 0.61 2.33 2.31 329.28 81 69 61NANANA 333.84 100.818854 116 0.61 2.33 2.32 333.88 81 69 60NANANA 338.44 99.619903.5 116 0.58 2.22 2.21 338.42 81 71 59NANANA 342.88 100.520953.5 116 0.58 2.22 2.21 342.90 81 71 59NANANA 347.36 100.3211003.5 116 0.56 2.15 2.14 347.37 80 72 58NANANA 351.75 100.9221053.5 116 0.56 2.15 2.15 351.79 79 71 58NANANA 356.16 100.7231103.5 116 0.54 2.08 2.07 356.19 78 71 57NANANA 360.48 99.8241153.5 116 0.54 2.08 2.08 360.47 77 71 57NANANA 364.75 99.9120 11:48364.751120 11:53 3.5 116 0.56 2.16 2.16 364.75 73 70 55NANANA 369.09 101.121253.5 116 0.56 2.16 2.16 369.14 79 70 57NANANA 373.51 99.831303.5 116 0.59 2.28 2.28 373.50 80 71 56NANANA 377.99 99.841353.5 117 0.59 2.28 2.29 377.98 80 71 57NANANA 382.47 100.651403.5 117 0.63 2.44 2.44 382.49 81 72 58NANANA 387.13 99.561453.5 117 0.63 2.44 2.45 387.11 81 72 57NANANA 391.75 100.271504 117 0.67 2.60 2.61 391.76 81 72 58NANANA 396.55 101.281554 117 0.67 2.61 2.61 396.60 81 73 58NANANA 401.39 100.991604 118 0.71 2.76 2.77 401.43 80 73 58NANANA 406.36 99.6101654 118 0.71 2.77 2.77 406.33 80 73 58NANANA 411.26 100.8111704 118 0.74 2.89 2.90 411.29 80 72 58NANANA 416.31 100.5121754 118 0.74 2.89 2.90 416.33 81 73 58NANANA 421.36 100.5131804 118 0.72 2.82 2.83 421.38 81 73 59NANANA 426.34 99.6141854 118 0.72 2.82 2.83 426.32 81 73 59NANANA 431.28 100.0151904 118 0.68 2.67 2.68 431.28 80 73 58NANANA 436.10 100.9161954 118 0.68 2.67 2.68 436.14 79 72 58NANANA 440.95 99.9172004 118 0.67 2.63 2.64 440.94 79 73 58NANANA 445.72 100.5182054 118 0.67 2.64 2.65 445.74 78 72 58NANANA 450.51 100.9192104 119 0.64 2.52 2.53 450.55 79 72 58NANANA 455.21 100.8202154 119 0.64 2.52 2.53 455.25 79 72 59NANANA 459.91 100.2212203.5 119 0.57 2.25 2.26 459.92 78 72 59NANANA 464.32 100.5222253.5 119 0.57 2.25 2.26 464.34 78 71 59NANANA 468.73 100.4232303.5 119 0.54 2.14 2.14 468.75 79 72 59NANANA 473.03 100.1242353.5 119 0.54 2.14 2.15 473.04 79 72 59NANANA 477.32 99.7240 13:53477.31Average 240116.0 0.65 2.49 2.47 223.945 76.0 67.0 58.5 #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0!100.371.52CompanyJM WinderSource DesignationLine 105Test Date1/26/2012Assumed Moisture (Bws)2Test Number2Condensate Volume (Vlc)65.5OperatorJPSilica Gel Weight Gain (Vlc)49.6Filter NumberNozzle Diameter (in.)0.26Barometric Pressure (Pb)30.11Leak Rate Initial.000 @ 11"Stack Static Pressure (Ps)-0.52Leak Rate Final.000 @ 8"Stack Dimensions 1 (in.)48Traverse points24*Stack Dimensions 2 (in.)Pitot Corr. Factor (Cp)0.84Pitot Tube Number5 ft CMeter Corr. Factor (Y)1.002Meter Number5Orsat Results (%)Meter Isokinetic Factor (Kiso)CO20.3Delta∆H@1.55O220.57Traverse Sampling Time Sampling Stack Temp.Velocity Pres.Desired Orifice OrificeSample VolumeDry Gas Meter Temp. Last Impinger Probe Filter Box Filter Box Exit Expected IsokineticPoint (Minutes) Clock Time Train Vac. (F) ("H2O) Differential Differential (cubic feet) Inlet Outlet Temperature Temperature Temperature Temperature DGM VariationNumber ø (24 hour) ("Hg) Ts∆Ps ("H2O)∆H ("H2O)∆H Vm (F) Tm (F) Tm (F)(F)(F)(F) (cubic feet) %10 7:56 5.5 109 0.60 2.27 2.20 477.95 52 52 48NANANA 482.32 99.6255.5 112 0.61 2.31 2.23 482.30 59 55 47NANANA 486.74 99.43105.5 113 0.63 2.39 2.32 486.71 64 56 51NANANA 491.24 99.64155.5 113 0.63 2.39 2.33 491.22 67 57 51NANANA 495.77 100.55205.5 114 0.66 2.51 2.45 495.79 69 58 51NANANA 500.45 100.86255.5 114 0.66 2.51 2.46 500.49 71 59 51NANANA 505.17 99.77306 114 0.68 2.59 2.53 505.15 72 60 50NANANA 509.91 99.98356 114 0.68 2.59 2.54 509.90 73 61 51NANANA 514.67 100.09406 114 0.70 2.67 2.62 514.66 74 61 50NANANA 519.50 100.510456 115 0.70 2.68 2.63 519.52 74 62 50NANANA 524.36 99.511506.5 115 0.74 2.83 2.78 524.33 75 63 50NANANA 529.32 100.412556.5 115 0.74 2.84 2.79 529.33 76 64 50NANANA 534.33 100.213606 115 0.72 2.76 2.72 534.33 77 65 51NANANA 539.27 99.814656 115 0.72 2.77 2.72 539.25 78 66 51NANANA 544.20 99.615706 114 0.65 2.50 2.46 544.17 78 66 51NANANA 548.87 100.616756 114 0.65 2.50 2.47 548.90 79 67 51NANANA 553.61 99.817805.5 114 0.61 2.35 2.32 553.60 79 68 51NANANA 558.17 100.018855.5 114 0.61 2.35 2.33 558.17 79 68 51NANANA 562.74 100.319905.5 114 0.58 2.24 2.22 562.75 79 68 51NANANA 567.21 100.820955.5 114 0.58 2.24 2.22 567.24 79 69 51NANANA 571.70 99.6211005 115 0.55 2.13 2.11 571.68 80 69 51NANANA 576.02 100.6221055 114 0.55 2.13 2.11 576.05 80 70 51NANANA 580.40 99.9231105 114 0.52 2.02 2.00 580.40 80 70 52NANANA 584.63 100.4241155 114 0.52 2.02 2.00 584.65 81 70 51NANANA 588.88 100.3120 9:56588.901120 10:01 5 114 0.55 2.14 2.13 588.90 74 71 51NANANA 593.23 100.721255 114 0.55 2.15 2.13 593.26 80 71 51NANANA 597.62 99.931305 114 0.58 2.26 2.25 597.61 81 72 50NANANA 602.09 99.541355 114 0.58 2.27 2.25 602.07 83 72 50NANANA 606.56 100.951405.5 114 0.64 2.50 2.49 606.60 84 73 50NANANA 611.32 100.461455.5 114 0.64 2.51 2.49 611.34 84 73 51NANANA 616.06 100.471506 114 0.66 2.59 2.58 616.08 85 74 51NANANA 620.89 100.881556 114 0.66 2.59 2.58 620.92 85 74 51NANANA 625.73 100.691606 115 0.70 2.75 2.74 625.75 85 75 51NANANA 630.70 100.5101656 115 0.70 2.76 2.75 630.72 85 75 52NANANA 635.67 100.7111706.5 115 0.74 2.92 2.91 635.70 85 75 52NANANA 640.79 100.2121756.5 115 0.74 2.92 2.91 640.79 85 75 52NANANA 645.88 99.6131806 115 0.71 2.80 2.80 645.85 85 75 53NANANA 650.84 100.6141856 115 0.71 2.81 2.80 650.86 86 76 53NANANA 655.85 100.0151906 114 0.68 2.69 2.69 655.85 86 76 54NANANA 660.74 100.7161956 114 0.68 2.69 2.69 660.77 86 76 55NANANA 665.66 99.9172006 114 0.68 2.70 2.70 665.65 86 76 55NANANA 670.54 100.9182056 114 0.68 2.70 2.70 670.58 87 77 55NANANA 675.48 99.7192106 114 0.65 2.58 2.59 675.46 87 77 56NANANA 680.25 100.7202156 114 0.65 2.59 2.59 680.28 87 77 56NANANA 685.07 100.3212205.5 114 0.57 2.27 2.27 685.08 87 78 57NANANA 689.57 100.4222255.5 114 0.57 2.27 2.27 689.59 87 78 57NANANA 694.08 99.3232305.5 114 0.56 2.24 2.24 694.05 87 78 57NANANA 698.50 100.0242355.5 114 0.56 2.24 2.24 698.50 88 78 57NANANA 702.96 99.9240 12:01702.95Average 240114.1 0.64 2.49 2.47 225.000 79 69 52 #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0!100.274.33CompanyJM WinderSource DesignationLine 105Test Date1/26/2012Assumed Moisture (Bws)2Test Number3Condensate Volume (Vlc)62OperatorJPSilica Gel Weight Gain (Vlc)58.6Filter NumberNozzle Diameter (in.)0.26Barometric Pressure (Pb)30.11Leak Rate Initial.008 @ 13"Stack Static Pressure (Ps)-0.52Leak Rate Final.000 @ 7"Stack Dimensions 1 (in.)48Traverse points24*Stack Dimensions 2 (in.)Pitot Corr. Factor (Cp)0.84Pitot Tube Number5 ft CMeter Corr. Factor (Y)1.002Meter Number5Orsat Results (%)Meter Isokinetic Factor (Kiso)CO20.3Delta∆H@1.55O220.57Traverse Sampling Time Sampling Stack Temp.Velocity Pres.Desired Orifice OrificeSample VolumeDry Gas Meter Temp. Last Impinger Probe Filter Box Filter Box Exit Expected IsokineticPoint (Minutes) Clock Time Train Vac. (F) ("H2O) Differential Differential (cubic feet) Inlet Outlet Temperature Temperature Temperature Temperature DGM VariationNumber ø (24 hour) ("Hg) Ts∆Ps ("H2O)∆H ("H2O)∆H Vm (F) Tm (F) Tm (F)(F)(F)(F) (cubic feet) %10 12:45 4 111 0.50 1.92 2.23 892.25 72 72 59nanana896.39 100.1254 111 0.50 1.92 2.23 896.39 73 72 55nanana900.53 98.83104 110 0.49 1.88 2.19 900.48 75 72 53nanana904.59 100.24154 110 0.49 1.88 2.19 904.60 77 72 54nanana908.72 99.65204 110 0.48 1.84 2.15 908.70 78 72 55nanana912.78 100.06254 110 0.48 1.84 2.15 912.78 78 72 57nanana916.86 99.57304 110 0.48 1.84 2.15 916.84 79 72 58nanana920.93 99.98354 110 0.46 1.76 2.06 920.92 79 72 58nanana924.92 99.39404 110 0.48 1.84 2.15 924.89 79 73 59nanana928.98 99.610454 110 0.48 1.84 2.15 928.96 80 73 60nanana933.05 99.211504 110 0.50 1.92 2.25 933.02 80 73 61nanana937.20 99.912554 110 0.50 1.92 2.25 937.19 80 73 61nanana941.37 99.413604 111 0.54 2.07 2.43 941.34 80 74 62nanana945.68 99.214654 111 0.54 2.07 2.43 945.64 81 74 62nanana949.99 99.515704 111 0.52 1.99 2.34 949.96 81 74 62nanana954.22 99.816754 111 0.53 2.03 2.38 954.21 81 74 63nanana958.52 100.017804 110 0.54 2.07 2.43 958.51 81 74 63nanana962.86 100.118854 110 0.54 2.07 2.43 962.86 81 74 64nanana967.21 100.119904 110 0.54 2.07 2.43 967.21 81 74 64nanana971.56 100.620954 110 0.54 2.07 2.43 971.58 81 74 64nanana975.93 100.4211004 110 0.49 1.88 2.21 975.94 81 74 64nanana980.08 99.5221054 110 0.49 1.88 2.21 980.06 81 74 64nanana984.20 98.8231104 109 0.47 1.80 2.12 984.15 81 75 64nanana988.22 100.7241154 110 0.47 1.80 2.12 988.24 81 75 65nanana992.30 101.0120 14:45992.34nanana1120 14:52 4 111 0.52 1.99 2.34 992.34 77 74 64nanana996.59 99.221254 111 0.52 1.99 2.34 996.55 78 74 64nanana 1000.80 100.031304 111 0.51 1.95 2.30 1000.80 80 74 63nanana 1005.02 100.641354 111 0.50 1.92 2.25 1005.04 81 74 64nanana 1009.22 100.051404 111 0.49 1.88 2.21 1009.22 81 75 65nanana 1013.36 99.761454 111 0.49 1.88 2.21 1013.35 81 75 65nanana 1017.49 100.071504 111 0.50 1.92 2.25 1017.49 82 75 66nanana 1021.68 100.881554 111 0.50 1.92 2.25 1021.71 82 75 65nanana 1025.90 101.091604 111 0.52 1.99 2.34 1025.94 82 75 61nanana 1030.21 99.8101654 111 0.52 1.99 2.34 1030.200 82 75 57nanana 1034.47 100.0111704 111 0.54 2.07 2.43 1034.470 82 75 55nanana 1038.82 99.6121754 111 0.54 2.07 2.43 1038.800 82 75 53nanana 1043.15 99.1131804 111 0.47 1.80 2.12 1043.110 82 75 52nanana 1047.17 100.0141854 111 0.47 1.80 2.12 1047.170 82 75 52nanana 1051.23 101.7151904 111 0.45 1.73 2.03 1051.300 82 76 51nanana 1055.28 98.1161954 110 0.45 1.73 2.04 1055.200 82 76 51nanana 1059.18 98.0172004 110 0.42 1.62 1.9 1059.100 82 76 51nanana 1062.95 100.1182054 110 0.42 1.62 1.9 1062.950 82 76 51nanana 1066.80 99.0192104 110 0.4 1.54 1.82 1066.760 82 76 51nanana 1070.51 101.7202154 110 0.35 1.35 1.59 1070.580 81 70 51nanana 1074.07 104.2212204 110 0.37 1.43 1.68 1074.220 81 76 51nanana 1077.83 101.4222254 110 0.37 1.43 1.69 1077.880 81 76 51nanana 1081.49 100.6232304 110 0.38 1.47 1.73 1081.510 81 76 51nanana 1085.17 99.8242354 110 0.38 1.47 1.74 1085.160 81 76 51nanana 1088.82 99.5240 16:521088.800Average 240110.4 0.48 1.85 2.17 196.550 80.2 74.1 58.5 #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0!100.077.17CompanyJM WinderSource Designation106Test Date1/23/2012Assumed Moisture (Bws)2Test Number1Condensate Volume (Vlc)27.7OperatorPMSilica Gel Weight Gain (Vlc)39Filter Number11121401Nozzle Diameter (in.)0.26Barometric Pressure (Pb)29.98Leak Rate Initial.001@15"Stack Static Pressure (Pg)0.31Leak Rate Final.000@8"Stack Dimensions 1 (in.)54Traverse points24*Stack Dimensions 2 (in.)Pitot Corr. Factor (Cp)0.84Pitot Tube Number5ft BMeter Corr. Factor (Y)0.998Meter NumberMB 3Orsat Results (%)Meter Isokinetic Factor (Kiso)CO20Delta∆H@1.77O220.63Traverse Sampling Time Sampling Stack Temp.Velocity Pres.Desired Orifice Actual OrificeSample VolumeDry Gas Meter Temp. Last Impinger Probe Filter Box Expected IsokineticPoint (Minutes) Clock Time Train Vac. (F) ("H2O) Differential Differential (cubic feet) Inlet Outlet Temperature Temperature Temperature DGM VariationNumber ø (24 hour) ("Hg) Ts∆Ps ("H2O)∆H ("H2O)∆H Vm (F) Tm (F) Tm (F)(F)(F) (cubic feet) %10 16:47 0 119 0.49 2.06 2.00 657.46 47 47 43250250 661.37 102.4254 120 0.49 2.06 2.00 661.46 54 50 41250251 665.41 101.43104 120 0.50 2.11 2.05 665.46 59 51 39249249 669.47 100.64154 120 0.50 2.11 2.06 669.49 61 52 40249252 673.51 101.85204 121 0.48 2.03 1.99 673.58 63 54 43248251 677.53 101.56254 120 0.48 2.03 1.99 677.59 64 54 44250251 681.55 101.17304 120 0.49 2.08 2.04 681.59 64 56 47248250 685.60 101.48354 120 0.49 2.08 2.04 685.65 65 56 49249252 689.66 101.59404 121 0.47 2.00 1.97 689.72 66 58 53250250 693.66 101.210454 120 0.47 2.00 1.97 693.70 66 58 54248251 697.64 101.311504 121 0.45 1.92 1.89 697.69 67 59 57249250 701.55 101.412554 121 0.45 1.92 1.89 701.60 67 60 59252251 705.47 102.013604 120 0.43 1.84 1.81 705.54 67 60 58250250 709.32 100.814654 120 0.43 1.84 1.81 709.35 68 60 58248250 713.14 102.115704 121 0.35 1.50 1.48 713.21 68 61 59249248 716.63 101.316753 121 0.35 1.50 1.48 716.67 68 61 57252251 720.09 101.917803 120 0.37 1.59 1.57 720.15 68 61 57250250 723.67 101.618853 120 0.37 1.59 1.57 723.72 68 62 58250250 727.24 101.219903 120 0.33 1.42 1.41 727.28 68 62 57252252 730.60 101.720953 120 0.33 1.42 1.41 730.66 68 62 56248249 733.98 101.7211003 121 0.28 1.21 1.20 734.04 69 63 56249249 737.10 101.8221053 118 0.28 1.21 1.20 737.16 68 63 53249250 740.23 101.0231103 118 0.27 1.17 1.16 740.26 68 63 52251250 743.27 101.8241153 118 0.27 1.17 1.16 743.33 68 63 54248250 746.34 101.5120 18:47746.391120 18:52 0 118 0.37 1.60 1.59 746.39 65 63 49252251 749.91 102.121253 118 0.37 1.61 1.59 749.98 67 63 50248251 753.50 101.931303 118 0.39 1.69 1.69 753.57 68 64 51249251 757.20 101.641353 118 0.39 1.70 1.69 757.25 69 64 53250250 760.88 101.551403 120 0.42 1.83 1.82 760.93 69 64 53248250 764.69 101.261453 120 0.42 1.83 1.82 764.73 69 64 55249250 768.49 101.271503 121 0.43 1.88 1.87 768.53 70 64 56248241 772.33 101.381553 121 0.43 1.88 1.87 772.38 70 64 56250249 776.18 101.691603 120 0.42 1.84 1.83 776.24 70 64 57248249 780.00 101.6101653 120 0.42 1.84 1.83 780.06 70 64 57249250 783.82 101.9111703 121 0.39 1.71 1.70 783.89 70 65 58248250 787.52 101.3121753 120 0.39 1.71 1.70 787.56 70 65 57250250 791.19 101.5131803 120 0.37 1.63 1.62 791.24 71 65 58251251 794.78 101.5141853 120 0.37 1.63 1.62 794.83 71 65 56249250 798.37 101.8151903 121 0.36 1.59 1.58 798.43 71 65 57251250 801.92 101.8161953 120 0.36 1.59 1.58 801.98 71 65 55248251 805.47 101.5172003 120 0.35 1.54 1.54 805.52 71 66 55249250 808.96 101.6182053 120 0.35 1.55 1.54 809.02 71 66 54251249 812.46 101.3192103 121 0.33 1.46 1.46 812.51 71 66 54250250 815.85 101.7202153 121 0.33 1.46 1.46 815.91 71 66 52252252 819.25 101.4212203 120 0.31 1.37 1.37 819.30 72 66 53251250 822.55 101.1222253 120 0.31 1.38 1.37 822.58 72 66 52248250 825.83 101.4232303 120 0.30 1.33 1.33 825.87 72 67 52251251 829.07 101.7242353 120 0.30 1.33 1.33 829.12 72 67 51250250 832.32 101.4240 20:52832.36Average 240120.0 0.39 1.68 1.67 174.900 67.5 61.5 53.0 249.5 250.1 749.1 101.564.54CompanyJM WinderSource Designation106Test Date1/24/2012Assumed Moisture (Bws)2Test Number2Condensate Volume (Vlc)21.9OperatorPMSilica Gel Weight Gain (Vlc)44.1Filter Number11121402Nozzle Diameter (in.)0.26Barometric Pressure (Pb)30.17Leak Rate Initial.001 @10"Stack Static Pressure (Ps)0.31Leak Rate Final.000 @7"Stack Dimensions 1 (in.)54Traverse points24*Stack Dimensions 2 (in.)Pitot Corr. Factor (Cp)0.84Pitot Tube Number5ft BMeter Corr. Factor (Y)0.998Meter NumberMB 3Orsat Results (%)Meter Isokinetic Factor (Kiso)CO20Delta∆H@1.77O220.63Traverse Sampling Time Sampling Stack Temp.Velocity Pres.Desired Orifice OrificeSample VolumeDry Gas Meter Temp. Last Impinger Probe Filter Box Expected IsokineticPoint (Minutes) Clock Time Train Vac. (F) ("H2O) Differential Differential (cubic feet) Inlet Outlet Temperature Temperature Temperature DGM VariationNumber ø (24 hour) ("Hg) Ts∆Ps ("H2O)∆H ("H2O)∆H Vm (F) Tm (F) Tm (F)(F)(F) (cubic feet) %10 9:12 0 118 0.29 1.26 1.19 833.21 49 49 49250251 836.23 100.4253 118 0.29 1.26 1.19 836.24 59 55 49250251 839.30 100.23103 118 0.30 1.31 1.25 839.31 62 56 47249248 842.44 100.04153 118 0.30 1.31 1.24 842.44 64 57 46250252 845.58 99.45203 119 0.33 1.44 1.39 845.56 67 59 46249250 848.86 100.26253 119 0.33 1.45 1.38 848.87 69 60 45250251 852.18 99.97303 121 0.34 1.49 1.43 852.18 71 62 47252251 855.55 100.38353 122 0.34 1.49 1.43 855.56 73 63 47249251 858.94 99.89403 122 0.36 1.58 1.53 858.93 74 65 50248250 862.41 99.610453 122 0.36 1.58 1.53 862.40 76 67 51250252 865.90 100.111503 122 0.38 1.67 1.62 865.90 78 68 54249250 869.50 100.512553 122 0.38 1.68 1.62 869.52 79 70 56252250 873.13 100.01360 10:12 3 122 0.46 2.03 1.97 873.13 81 71 56248250 877.12 99.71465 10:23 3 122 0.46 2.03 1.97 877.10 80 75 55250251 881.10 100.215703 122 0.49 2.17 2.11 881.10 82 76 56248250 885.24 100.016753 122 0.49 2.17 2.11 885.23 84 76 55248251 889.38 99.817803 122 0.47 2.09 2.03 889.36 86 78 57251250 893.43 100.018853 121 0.47 2.09 2.03 893.43 88 79 60248250 897.52 100.419903 120 0.43 1.91 1.87 897.53 89 80 62248251 901.45 100.120953 122 0.43 1.91 1.87 901.45 90 81 62248252 905.37 99.8211003 123 0.40 1.78 1.75 905.36 91 82 63249250 909.15 99.9221053 124 0.40 1.79 1.75 909.14 92 84 63248249 912.93 100.2231103 124 0.38 1.70 1.67 912.94 93 85 63250250 916.64 99.9241153 124 0.38 1.70 1.67 916.64 93 86 63250251 920.35 100.1120 11:22920.3511203 122 0.31 1.39 1.37 920.35 90 88 60250251 923.70 100.221253 124 0.31 1.39 1.37 923.71 93 88 61251251 927.07 99.831303 124 0.32 1.44 1.42 927.06 94 88 60250250 930.47 100.241353 124 0.32 1.44 1.42 930.48 94 89 60248250 933.90 100.251403 124 0.31 1.40 1.38 933.90 95 89 59249252 937.26 99.661453 124 0.31 1.40 1.38 937.25 95 90 58248249 940.62 99.871503 124 0.33 1.49 1.47 940.61 96 90 58251251 944.09 100.181553 124 0.33 1.49 1.48 944.09 96 91 57250250 947.57 100.391603 124 0.33 1.49 1.48 947.58 97 91 59251249 951.06 100.2101653 124 0.33 1.49 1.48 951.07 98 92 58248249 954.56 99.7111703 125 0.37 1.68 1.67 954.55 98 92 59251248 958.24 100.5121753 125 0.37 1.68 1.67 958.26 99 93 58252241 961.96 100.1131803 124 0.43 1.95 1.94 961.96 99 93 59251250 965.95 100.6141853 125 0.43 1.96 1.94 965.97 99 94 60252251 969.96 100.1151903 125 0.40 1.82 1.81 969.96 100 94 61248251 973.81 100.3161953 125 0.40 1.82 1.82 973.82 101 94 62248249 977.68 100.5172003 126 0.41 1.87 1.87 977.69 101 94 62251250 981.59 100.3182053 126 0.41 1.87 1.87 981.60 101 95 63253251 985.50 99.7192103 126 0.39 1.78 1.78 985.49 101 96 62247248 989.30 100.3202153 126 0.39 1.79 1.78 989.31 102 96 62250252 993.12 100.0212203 126 0.33 1.51 1.51 993.12 102 96 63250249 996.63 100.1222253 126 0.33 1.52 1.51 996.63 102 96 63251248 1000.14 100.3232303 126 0.31 1.43 1.42 1000.15 102 96 62250250 1003.55 100.0242353 126 0.31 1.43 1.43 1003.55 102 97 62248252 1006.95 99.9240 13:321006.95Average 240123.0 0.37 1.66 1.62 173.740 88 81 5725025092110084.72CompanyJM WinderSource Designation106Test Date1/24/2012Assumed Moisture (Bws)2Test Number3Condensate Volume (Vlc)13OperatorPMSilica Gel Weight Gain (Vlc)32.6Filter Number11121404Nozzle Diameter (in.)0.26Barometric Pressure (Pb)30.17Leak Rate Initial.001@10"Stack Static Pressure (Ps)0.31Leak Rate Final.000@7"Stack Dimensions 1 (in.)54Traverse points24*Stack Dimensions 2 (in.)Pitot Corr. Factor (Cp)0.84Pitot Tube Number5ft BMeter Corr. Factor (Y)0.998Meter NumberMB 3Orsat Results (%)Meter Isokinetic Factor (Kiso)CO20Delta∆H@1.77O220.63Traverse Sampling Time Sampling Stack Temp.Velocity Pres.Desired Orifice OrificeSample VolumeDry Gas Meter Temp. Last Impinger Probe Filter Box Expected IsokineticPoint (Minutes) Clock Time Train Vac. (F) ("H2O) Differential Differential (cubic feet) Inlet Outlet Temperature Temperature Temperature DGM VariationNumber ø (24 hour) ("Hg) Ts∆Ps ("H2O)∆H ("H2O)∆H Vm (F) Tm (F) Tm (F)(F)(F) (cubic feet) %10 14:07 0 122 0.31 1.36 1.38 7.25 95 94 6025025110.63 100.1254 123 0.31 1.36 1.38 10.64 96 94 6025125214.03 100.43104 125 0.32 1.40 1.42 14.04 97 95 6025025217.48 100.34154 125 0.32 1.41 1.42 17.49 99 95 5825025120.94 100.15204 127 0.35 1.54 1.56 20.94 99 95 5825024924.54 100.16254 128 0.35 1.54 1.56 24.54 100 95 5924825128.14 100.17304 130 0.34 1.50 1.51 28.14 100 95 5824925031.68 100.38354 131 0.34 1.50 1.51 31.69 101 96 5925125035.2399.69404 131 0.35 1.55 1.56 35.22 101 96 6024925038.8199.910454 131 0.35 1.55 1.56 38.81 101 96 6125125042.40 100.411504 131 0.37 1.64 1.65 42.42 101 96 6025325246.12 100.412554 131 0.37 1.64 1.65 46.13 101 96 6124925049.83 100.413604 131 0.40 1.78 1.79 49.84 101 96 6024825053.68 100.014654 131 0.40 1.78 1.79 53.68 101 96 6025025257.52 100.315704 132 0.43 1.91 1.93 57.53 101 96 6124925161.51 100.116754 132 0.43 1.92 1.93 61.51 101 96 6024824965.4999.817804 132 0.45 2.01 1.97 65.48 101 96 6125025269.55 100.118854 132 0.45 2.01 1.97 69.55 101 96 6024825173.6299.819904 133 0.43 1.92 1.93 73.61 101 96 6024825277.59 100.220955 133 0.43 1.92 1.94 77.59 101 96 6124924981.57 100.4211005 133 0.37 1.66 1.67 81.58 101 96 6224925085.27 100.1221055 133 0.37 1.66 1.67 85.27 101 96 6125325288.9699.8231105 133 0.35 1.57 1.58 88.95 101 96 6225224992.54 100.1241155 133 0.35 1.57 1.58 92.54 101 96 6225324996.13 100.1120 16:0796.131120 16:15 4 132 0.29 1.31 1.31 96.13 96 95 6224925199.3899.621254 132 0.29 1.31 1.31 99.37 97 95 62249249 102.62 99.531304 132 0.30 1.36 1.36 102.61 97 95 61251249 105.92 100.341354 132 0.30 1.36 1.36 105.93 98 94 61249250 109.24 100.051404 132 0.32 1.45 1.45 109.24 98 94 59247251 112.66 99.761454 132 0.32 1.45 1.46 112.65 99 94 58252250 116.07 100.271504 132 0.35 1.59 1.59 116.08 99 94 58253251 119.66 100.681554 132 0.35 1.59 1.60 119.68 99 94 58247249 123.26 100.191604 133 0.33 1.50 1.51 123.26 99 95 56248252 126.74 100.4101654 133 0.33 1.50 1.51 126.75 99 95 57247250 130.23 100.4111704 134 0.32 1.46 1.46 130.24 99 95 58249250 133.66 100.3121754 134 0.32 1.46 1.46 133.67 98 94 57251251 137.08 99.6131804 133 0.42 1.92 1.92 137.07 98 94 58249251 140.98 99.8141854 133 0.42 1.92 1.93 140.97 98 94 57250251 144.88 100.3151904 134 0.44 2.02 2.02 144.89 98 94 58249249 148.89 100.1161954 134 0.44 2.02 2.02 148.89 97 93 57248251 152.89 100.5172004 135 0.46 2.11 2.12 152.90 97 93 57251250 156.98 100.1182054 135 0.46 2.11 2.12 156.98 97 93 58250250 161.06 100.4192104 135 0.45 2.07 2.07 161.07 97 93 59249251 165.11 100.5202154 135 0.45 2.07 2.07 165.12 96 92 58248249 169.15 99.9212204 135 0.43 1.98 1.98 169.14 96 92 59250250 173.08 100.1222254 135 0.43 1.99 1.99 173.08 95 91 58248248 177.01 100.1232304 135 0.41 1.89 1.90 177.01 94 91 60249252 180.85 99.7242354 135 0.41 1.90 1.90 180.83 93 90 59248250 184.66 100.1240184.66Average 240131.8 0.37 1.69 1.69 177.410 98.7 94.6 59.4 249.6 250.496.6100.196.63CompanyJM WinderSource Designation106Test Date1/23/2012Assumed Moisture (Bws)2Test Number1Condensate Volume (Vlc)44OperatorJPSilica Gel Weight Gain (Vlc)34.7Filter NumberNozzle Diameter (in.)0.26Barometric Pressure (Pb)29.92Leak Rate Initial.003 @ 15 "Stack Static Pressure (Pg)0.31Leak Rate Final.000 @ 6"Stack Dimensions 1 (in.)54Traverse points24*Stack Dimensions 2 (in.)Pitot Corr. Factor (Cp)0.84Pitot Tube NumberMeter Corr. Factor (Y)1.002Meter Number5Orsat Results (%)Meter Isokinetic Factor (Kiso)CO20Delta∆H@1.55O220.63Traverse Sampling Time Sampling Stack Temp.Velocity Pres.Desired Orifice Actual OrificeSample VolumeDry Gas Meter Temp. Last Impinger Probe Filter Box Filter Box Exit Expected IsokineticPoint (Minutes) Clock Time Train Vac. (F) ("H2O) Differential Differential (cubic feet) Inlet Outlet Temperature Temperature Temperature Temperature DGM VariationNumber ø (24 hour) ("Hg) Ts∆Ps ("H2O)∆H ("H2O)∆H Vm (F) Tm (F) Tm (F)(F)(F)(F) (cubic feet) %10 16:47 4 122 0.42 1.53 1.50 732.80 49 49 46NANANA 736.42 100.1254 123 0.42 1.53 1.50 736.42 49 49 45NANANA 740.04 100.23104 123 0.41 1.50 1.46 740.04 50 49 45NANANA 743.62 100.44154 123 0.41 1.50 1.47 743.63 52 49 45NANANA 747.21 99.45204 123 0.44 1.60 1.58 747.19 53 49 46NANANA 750.91 100.26254 122 0.44 1.60 1.58 750.91 55 49 47NANANA 754.64 100.27304 122 0.45 1.64 1.62 754.64 56 50 48NANANA 758.42 99.78354 123 0.45 1.64 1.62 758.40 57 50 48NANANA 762.18 99.79404 122 0.41 1.50 1.48 762.16 58 51 48NANANA 765.77 100.510454 122 0.41 1.50 1.48 765.79 59 51 48NANANA 769.41 100.711504 122 0.38 1.39 1.38 769.43 59 51 48NANANA 772.91 100.512554 122 0.38 1.39 1.38 772.93 60 52 48NANANA 776.42 99.813604 122 0.36 1.31 1.31 776.41 60 52 49NANANA 779.81 100.114654 121 0.36 1.31 1.31 779.81 61 53 48NANANA 783.22 100.115703.5 121 0.35 1.28 1.28 783.22 61 53 49NANANA 786.58 100.416753.5 121 0.35 1.28 1.28 786.59 61 53 48NANANA 789.95 100.917803.5 120 0.35 1.28 1.28 789.98 62 54 48NANANA 793.35 100.118853.5 120 0.35 1.28 1.28 793.35 62 54 48NANANA 796.72 99.519903.5 121 0.32 1.17 1.18 796.70 62 55 48NANANA 799.92 100.620953.5 121 0.32 1.17 1.18 799.94 63 55 48NANANA 803.16 99.2211003.5 121 0.31 1.13 1.14 803.14 63 55 48NANANA 806.31 99.6221053.5 121 0.31 1.13 1.15 806.30 63 55 48NANANA 809.47 100.8231103.5 121 0.30 1.09 1.11 809.50 63 56 47NANANA 812.62 98.9241153.5 121 0.30 1.09 1.11 812.59 63 56 47NANANA 815.71 99.5120 18:47815.701120 18:52 4.5 120 0.45 1.64 1.67 815.70 58 56 46NANANA 819.51 99.321254.5 120 0.45 1.64 1.68 819.48 61 57 46NANANA 823.31 99.731304.5 120 0.48 1.75 1.79 823.29 63 57 47NANANA 827.25 99.941354.5 121 0.48 1.75 1.79 827.24 64 57 48NANANA 831.20 100.451404.5 121 0.49 1.79 1.83 831.21 65 57 48NANANA 835.21 99.861454.5 121 0.49 1.79 1.84 835.20 65 58 49NANANA 839.21 99.971504.5 121 0.48 1.75 1.80 839.20 66 58 50NANANA 843.17 99.981554.5 122 0.48 1.75 1.80 843.16 66 58 50NANANA 847.13 100.291604.5 121 0.45 1.64 1.69 847.13 66 59 51NANANA 850.98 100.4101654.5 121 0.45 1.64 1.70 850.99 67 59 51NANANA 854.84 100.3111704.5 122 0.45 1.64 1.70 854.85 68 60 52NANANA 858.71 100.5121754.5 122 0.45 1.64 1.70 858.72 68 60 52NANANA 862.58 100.5131804 122 0.41 1.50 1.55 862.59 68 60 52NANANA 866.27 100.9141854 122 0.41 1.50 1.55 866.30 68 60 51NANANA 869.98 100.3151904 122 0.36 1.32 1.37 869.99 68 61 52NANANA 873.44 100.5161954 122 0.36 1.32 1.37 873.46 68 61 50NANANA 876.91 99.7172003.5 122 0.35 1.28 1.33 876.90 68 61 50NANANA 880.30 99.9182053.5 122 0.35 1.28 1.33 880.30 68 61 50NANANA 883.70 99.9192103.5 122 0.32 1.18 1.22 883.70 69 62 49NANANA 886.96 100.6202153.5 122 0.32 1.18 1.22 886.98 69 62 49NANANA 890.24 99.0212203.5 122 0.32 1.18 1.23 890.21 69 62 50NANANA 893.47 99.3222253.5 121 0.32 1.18 1.23 893.45 69 62 49NANANA 896.71 99.9232303.5 118 0.29 1.07 1.11 896.71 69 62 49NANANA 899.83 100.8242353.5 118 0.29 1.07 1.12 899.85 69 63 49NANANA 902.97 99.4240 20:52902.95Average 240121.4 0.39 1.42 1.44 170.150 62.5 55.9 48.5 #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0!100.059.20CompanyJM WinderSource DesignationLine 106Test Date1/24/2012Assumed Moisture (Bws)2Test Number2Condensate Volume (Vlc)44OperatorJPSilica Gel Weight Gain (Vlc)34.7Filter NumberNozzle Diameter (in.)0.26Barometric Pressure (Pb)30.17Leak Rate Initial.000 @ 12"Stack Static Pressure (Ps)0.31Leak Rate Final.000 @ 6"Stack Dimensions 1 (in.)54Traverse points24*Stack Dimensions 2 (in.)Pitot Corr. Factor (Cp)0.84Pitot Tube Number5 ft CMeter Corr. Factor (Y)1.002Meter Number5Orsat Results (%)Meter Isokinetic Factor (Kiso)CO20Delta∆H@1.55O220.63Traverse Sampling Time Sampling Stack Temp.Velocity Pres.Desired Orifice OrificeSample VolumeDry Gas Meter Temp. Last Impinger Probe Filter Box Filter Box Exit Expected IsokineticPoint (Minutes) Clock Time Train Vac. (F) ("H2O) Differential Differential (cubic feet) Inlet Outlet Temperature Temperature Temperature Temperature DGM VariationNumber ø (24 hour) ("Hg) Ts∆Ps ("H2O)∆H ("H2O)∆H Vm (F) Tm (F) Tm (F)(F)(F)(F) (cubic feet) %10 9:12 2.5 122 0.30 1.12 1.08 904.90 52 51 60NANANA 907.96 100.3252.5 122 0.30 1.13 1.08 907.97 53 51 56NANANA 911.03 99.53102.5 122 0.30 1.13 1.08 911.02 55 52 56NANANA 914.09 99.94152.5 122 0.30 1.13 1.08 914.09 57 52 56NANANA 917.17 100.35202.5 122 0.31 1.17 1.12 917.18 59 53 57NANANA 920.32 99.16252.5 123 0.31 1.17 1.12 920.29 61 53 58NANANA 923.43 99.97302.5 123 0.34 1.28 1.23 923.43 62 54 58NANANA 926.73 99.58352.5 123 0.34 1.28 1.24 926.71 63 55 58NANANA 930.01 99.99402.5 123 0.35 1.32 1.28 930.01 65 56 57NANANA 933.37 99.410452.5 123 0.35 1.33 1.28 933.35 65 56 58NANANA 936.71 100.611502.5 123 0.37 1.40 1.36 936.73 66 57 58NANANA 940.19 99.712552.5 123 0.37 1.40 1.36 940.18 67 58 59NANANA 943.65 100.01360 10:12/10:22 3 123 0.40 1.52 1.47 943.65 67 58 59NANANA 947.26 99.914653 124 0.40 1.52 1.47 947.25 69 60 57NANANA 950.87 100.115703 124 0.41 1.56 1.52 950.87 72 62 57NANANA 954.55 99.216753 125 0.42 1.60 1.55 954.52 75 63 56NANANA 958.26 101.017803 124 0.44 1.68 1.63 958.29 78 65 56NANANA 962.14 99.418853 124 0.44 1.68 1.64 962.11 80 66 56NANANA 965.97 99.719903 124 0.44 1.68 1.64 965.95 81 68 56NANANA 969.82 101.020953 124 0.44 1.69 1.64 969.85 82 70 57NANANA 973.73 100.4211003 124 0.41 1.57 1.53 973.74 84 71 57NANANA 977.49 100.5221053 124 0.41 1.57 1.54 977.51 84 72 58NANANA 981.27 100.1231103 125 0.39 1.50 1.47 981.27 85 73 58NANANA 984.94 99.6241153 125 0.39 1.50 1.47 984.92 87 75 57NANANA 988.60 100.6120 11:22988.621120 11:31 2.5 122 0.30 1.16 1.13 988.62 82 78 53NANANA 991.85 99.021252.5 124 0.30 1.16 1.14 991.82 88 79 56NANANA 995.07 99.531302.5 125 0.31 1.20 1.18 995.05 90 80 56NANANA 998.36 101.041352.5 125 0.31 1.20 1.18 998.39 91 81 54NANANA 1001.70 98.751402.5 125 0.32 1.24 1.22 1001.66 91 81 54NANANA 1005.03 99.561452.5 125 0.32 1.24 1.22 1005.01 91 82 54NANANA 1008.38 99.471502.5 126 0.34 1.32 1.30 1008.36 92 82 55NANANA 1011.83 100.581552.5 126 0.34 1.32 1.31 1011.85 92 83 55NANANA 1015.33 99.691602.5 126 0.36 1.40 1.39 1015.31 93 84 56NANANA 1018.89 100.2101652.5 126 0.36 1.40 1.39 1018.90 94 84 56NANANA 1022.49 99.6111703 126 0.40 1.56 1.55 1022.47 94 84 57NANANA 1026.25 100.9121753 127 0.40 1.56 1.55 1026.28 94 85 56NANANA 1030.06 100.8131803 127 0.44 1.72 1.71 1030.09 93 86 56NANANA 1034.06 100.5141853 127 0.44 1.72 1.71 1034.07 94 86 57NANANA 1038.04 99.1151903 127 0.45 1.76 1.75 1038.00 94 86 57NANANA 1042.01 100.3161953 127 0.45 1.77 1.76 1042.02 94 86 58NANANA 1046.03 99.5172003 127 0.47 1.85 1.84 1046.01 94 86 58NANANA 1050.11 99.9182053 128 0.47 1.85 1.84 1050.10 94 87 58NANANA 1054.20 100.6192103 127 0.47 1.85 1.84 1054.22 94 86 59NANANA 1058.32 99.6202153 127 0.47 1.85 1.85 1058.30 94 87 60NANANA 1062.41 100.0212203 127 0.46 1.82 1.81 1062.40 93 87 60NANANA 1066.46 100.7222253 126 0.46 1.82 1.81 1066.48 93 87 61NANANA 1070.54 99.4232303 126 0.44 1.74 1.74 1070.51 93 87 61NANANA 1074.48 100.6242353 126 0.44 1.74 1.74 1074.50 92 87 62NANANA 1078.47 100.42401078.48Average 240124.7 0.38 1.48 1.46 173.580 81 72 57 #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0!100.076.61CompanyJM WinderSource DesignationLine 106Test Date1/24/2012Assumed Moisture (Bws)2Test Number3Condensate Volume (Vlc)OperatorJPSilica Gel Weight Gain (Vlc)Filter NumberNozzle Diameter (in.)0.26Barometric Pressure (Pb)30.17Leak Rate Initial.000 @ 12"Stack Static Pressure (Ps)0.31Leak Rate Final.000 @ 6"Stack Dimensions 1 (in.)54Traverse points24*Stack Dimensions 2 (in.)Pitot Corr. Factor (Cp)0.84Pitot Tube Number5 ft CMeter Corr. Factor (Y)1.002Meter Number5Orsat Results (%)Meter Isokinetic Factor (Kiso)CO20Delta∆H@1.55O220.63Traverse Sampling Time Sampling Stack Temp.Velocity Pres.Desired Orifice OrificeSample VolumeDry Gas Meter Temp. Last Impinger Probe Filter Box Filter Box Exit Expected IsokineticPoint (Minutes) Clock Time Train Vac. (F) ("H2O) Differential Differential (cubic feet) Inlet Outlet Temperature Temperature Temperature Temperature DGM VariationNumber ø (24 hour) ("Hg) Ts∆Ps ("H2O)∆H ("H2O)∆H Vm (F) Tm (F) Tm (F)(F)(F)(F) (cubic feet) %10 14:07 3 122 0.30 1.12 1.14 78.67 83 83 66NANANA81.9299.4253 123 0.30 1.12 1.14 81.90 84 83 65NANANA85.1599.13103 124 0.30 1.12 1.14 85.12 85 83 65NANANA88.37 100.34153 124 0.30 1.12 1.14 88.38 86 83 65NANANA91.6399.95203 123 0.32 1.20 1.22 91.63 86 83 65NANANA94.9999.36253 132 0.32 1.20 1.22 94.97 87 83 65NANANA98.31 100.97303 132 0.33 1.24 1.26 98.34 87 83 64NANANA 101.73 99.48353 132 0.33 1.24 1.26 101.71 87 83 64NANANA 105.10 100.59403 132 0.35 1.31 1.34 105.12 88 83 64NANANA 108.62 99.310453 132 0.35 1.31 1.34 108.59 87 83 64NANANA 112.08 100.211503.5 132 0.39 1.46 1.49 112.09 87 83 64NANANA 115.78 100.712553.5 132 0.39 1.46 1.49 115.80 88 83 64NANANA 119.49 99.513603.5 132 0.42 1.57 1.61 119.47 88 83 64NANANA 123.30 100.614653.5 132 0.42 1.57 1.61 123.32 88 83 64NANANA 127.15 100.415703.5 133 0.45 1.69 1.73 127.16 88 83 64NANANA 131.12 99.816753.5 133 0.45 1.69 1.73 131.11 88 83 64NANANA 135.07 100.417803.5 133 0.46 1.72 1.77 135.08 88 83 65NANANA 139.08 100.518853.5 133 0.46 1.72 1.77 139.10 88 84 64NANANA 143.11 99.419903.5 133 0.46 1.72 1.77 143.08 89 84 65NANANA 147.09 100.620953.5 133 0.46 1.72 1.77 147.11 89 84 64NANANA 151.12 99.6211003.5 133 0.45 1.69 1.74 151.10 88 84 63NANANA 155.06 100.0221053.5 133 0.45 1.69 1.74 155.06 88 84 63NANANA 159.02 100.3231103.5 133 0.44 1.65 1.70 159.03 88 84 63NANANA 162.95 100.9241153.5 133 0.44 1.65 1.70 162.98 88 84 64NANANA 166.90 100.4120 16:07166.911120 16:15 3 133 0.29 1.09 1.12 166.91 84 83 60NANANA 170.08 99.421253 133 0.29 1.09 1.12 170.06 85 83 61NANANA 173.23 100.631303 133 0.30 1.12 1.16 173.25 86 83 59NANANA 176.48 99.141353 133 0.30 1.12 1.17 176.45 86 83 57NANANA 179.68 101.351403 134 0.30 1.12 1.17 179.72 86 82 55NANANA 182.94 100.261453 134 0.30 1.12 1.17 182.95 86 82 55NANANA 186.17 99.671503 134 0.34 1.27 1.33 186.16 86 82 55NANANA 189.59 100.681553 134 0.34 1.27 1.33 189.61 86 82 55NANANA 193.04 99.491603 134 0.35 1.31 1.37 193.02 86 82 55NANANA 196.50 100.3101653 134 0.35 1.31 1.37 196.51 85 82 55NANANA 199.99 101.0111703 135 0.38 1.42 1.49 200.02 85 81 55NANANA 203.64 100.7121753 135 0.38 1.42 1.49 203.66 85 81 55NANANA 207.28 100.4131803 135 0.40 1.50 1.57 207.29 85 81 55NANANA 211.00 100.9141853 135 0.40 1.50 1.57 211.03 85 80 55NANANA 214.74 100.7151903 135 0.40 1.50 1.57 214.76 84 80 55NANANA 218.46 98.9161953 135 0.41 1.54 1.61 218.42 84 80 54NANANA 222.17 100.4172003.5 135 0.43 1.62 1.69 222.18 83 79 55NANANA 226.01 100.3182053.5 135 0.43 1.62 1.69 226.02 83 79 54NANANA 229.85 99.5192103.5 135 0.43 1.62 1.69 229.83 83 78 53NANANA 233.66 100.1202153.5 135 0.43 1.63 1.70 233.66 82 78 53NANANA 237.49 100.2212203 133 0.40 1.51 1.58 237.49 82 78 52NANANA 241.19 100.4222253 134 0.40 1.52 1.58 241.20 81 77 52NANANA 244.89 100.7232303 134 0.40 1.52 1.58 244.91 81 77 52NANANA 248.60 100.4242353 134 0.40 1.52 1.58 248.61 80 76 51NANANA 252.29 100.4240252.30Average 240132.4 0.38 1.42 1.47 173.630 85.7 81.8 59.6 #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0!100.183.75

# Appendix B

Process Data

# Appendix C

Equipment Calibration DocumentsOxygen and Carbon Dioxide Concentration Results SummaryJohns Manville - Winder, GABTEC Project No. 11-4191.01Sampling Dates: 1/23/12-1/26/12Source: 106ParameterRun 1 Run 2 Run 3 AverageTest Run Date1/23/2012 1/24/2012 1/24/2012Test Time21:24 15:35 19:22Oxygen concentration (%)20.73 20.75 20.75 20.74Oxygen concentration (%) (corrected as per USEPA 3A)20.63 20.65 20.62 20.63Carbon Dioxide concentration (%)0.00 0.01 0.02 0.01Carbon Dioxide concentration (%) (corrected as per USEPA 3A)-0.07 0.00 0.01 -0.02CO2CorrectionO2Correction1 2 31 2 3Co0.07 0.01 0.01Co-0.01 0.02 0.01Cma10.20 10.20 10.20Cma9.95 9.95 9.95Cm10.14 10.16 10.05Cm10.00 10.01 10.02Co= Average of initial and final zero gasesCma=Actual concentration of the calibration gasCm= Average of initial and final calibration gasesOxygen and Carbon Dioxide Concentration Results SummaryJohns Manville - Winder, GABTEC Project No. 11-4191.01Sampling Dates: 1/23/12-1/26/12Source: 105ParameterRun 1 Run 2 Run 3 AverageTest Run Date1/25/2012 1/26/2012 1/26/2012Test Time14:40 14:33 14:36Oxygen concentration (%)20.76 20.67 20.73 20.72Oxygen concentration (%) (corrected as per USEPA 3A)20.65 20.51 20.57 20.57Carbon Dioxide concentration (%)0.02 0.01 0.10 0.04Carbon Dioxide concentration (%) (corrected as per USEPA 3A)0.01 0.00 0.09 0.03CO2CorrectionO2Correction1 2 31 2 3Co0.01 0.01 0.02Co-0.01 0.06 0.06Cma10.20 10.20 10.20Cma9.95 9.95 9.95Cm10.26 10.32 10.22Cm10.00 10.06 10.06Co= Average of initial and final zero gasesCma=Actual concentration of the calibration gasCm= Average of initial and final calibration gasesMETHOD 5 DRY GAS METER CALIBRATION USING CRITICAL ORIFICES1) Select three critical orifices to calibrate the dry gas meter which bracket the expected operating range.2) Record barometric pressure before and after calibration procedure.3) Run at tested vacuum (from Orifice Calibration Report), for a period of timenecessary to achieve a minimum total volume of 5 cubic feet.4) Record data and information in theGREENcells, YELLOW cells are calculated.INITIAL FINAL AVG (Pbar)DATE: 1/13/2012 METER SERIAL #: C-5000BAROMETRIC PRESSURE (in Hg): 29.54 29.54 29.54IF Y VARIATION EXCEEDS 2.00%,METER PART #: MB3CRITICAL ORIFICE SET SERIAL #: 1447ORIFICE SHOULD BE RECALIBRATEDK' TESTEDTEMPERATURES °FELAPSEDFACTOR VACUUMDGM READINGS (FT3)AMBIENT DGM INLET DGM OUTLET DGM TIME (MIN) DGM∆H(1)(2)(3)YORIFICE # RUN # (AVG) (in Hg)INITIAL FINALNET (Vm)INITIAL FINAL INITIAL FINAL AVGθ(in H2O) Vm(STD) Vcr(STD)YVARIATION (%)∆H@1 0.8778 16602.70 609.330 6.63067 52 54 50 52 526.004.1 6.82066.77920.9941.862 0.8778 16609.330 615.980 6.65066 54 57 52 53 546.004.1 6.81466.78570.9961.853 0.8778 16615.980 622.670 6.69066 57 61 53 55 56.56.004.1 6.82246.78570.9951.84AVG = 0.995-0.281 0.5057 16623.0 628.760 5.76065 60 63 56 58 59.25 9.001.3 5.80255.86941.0121.732 0.5057 16628.760 634.550 5.79066 63 66 58 60 61.75 9.001.3 5.80485.86381.0101.733 0.5057 16634.550 640.340 5.79067 66 68 60 62 649.001.3 5.77985.85831.0141.72AVG = 1.0121.421 0.3367 16640.50 645.810 5.31066 66 68 62 64 6512.00 0.58 5.28115.20560.9861.722 0.3367 16645.810 651.120 5.31067 68 70 64 65 66.75 12.00 0.58 5.26365.20060.9881.723 0.3367 16651.120 656.460 5.34067 70 70 65 67 6812.00 0.58 5.28085.20060.9851.72AVG = 0.986-1.14AVERAGE DRY GAS METER CALIBRATION FACTOR, Y =0.998AVERAGE∆H@=1.77(1)=Net volume of gas sample passed through DGM, corrected to standard conditionsK1=17.64oR/in. Hg (English), 0.3858oK/mm Hg (Metric)Tm=Absolute DGM avg. temperature (oR - English,oK - Metric)∆H@=0.75θ∆H Vm(std)Vcr(std)Vm(2)=Volume of gas sample passed through the critical orifice, corrected to standard conditionsTamb=Absolute ambient temperature (oR - English,oK - Metric)K' = Average K' factor from Critical Orifice Calibration(3)=DGM calibration factor321812ENVIRONMENTAL SUPPLY COMPANYUSING THE CRITICAL ORIFICES AS CALIBRATION STANDARDS:The following equations are used to calculate the standard volumes of air passed through the DGM, Vm(std), and the criticalorifice, Vcr(std), and the DGM calibration factor, Y. These equations are automatically calculated in the spreadsheet above.()2()TmHPbarVmKVmstd)6.13/(1)(∆+∗∗=TambPbarKVcrstdΘ∗∗=')()()(stdstdVmVcrY=Meter box 3 calsMETHOD 5 DRY GAS METER CALIBRATION USING CRITICAL ORIFICES1) Select three critical orifices to calibrate the dry gas meter which bracket the expected operating range.2) Record barometric pressure before and after calibration procedure.3) Run at tested vacuum (from Orifice Calibration Report), for a period of timenecessary to achieve a minimum total volume of 5 cubic feet.4) Record data and information in theGREENcells, YELLOW cells are calculated.INITIAL FINAL AVG (Pbar)DATE: 1/20/2012 METER SERIAL #: 1672BAROMETRIC PRESSURE (in Hg): 30.27 30.29 30.28IF Y VARIATION EXCEEDS 2.00%,METER PART #: MB5CRITICAL ORIFICE SET SERIAL #: 1447ORIFICE SHOULD BE RECALIBRATEDK' TESTEDTEMPERATURES °FELAPSEDFACTOR VACUUMDGM READINGS (FT3)AMBIENT DGM INLET DGM OUTLET DGM TIME (MIN) DGM∆H(1)(2)(3)YORIFICE # RUN # (AVG) (in Hg)INITIAL FINALNET (Vm)INITIAL FINAL INITIAL FINAL AVGθ(in H2O) Vm(STD) Vcr(STD)YVARIATION (%)∆H@1 0.8778 15679.220 685.945 6.72555 55 55 55 55 556.003.7 7.04187.02960.9981.592 0.8778 15685.945 692.708 6.76355 55 56 55 55 55.25 6.003.7 7.07827.02960.9931.593 0.8778 15692.708 699.442 6.73455 56 59 55 56 56.56.003.7 7.03087.02961.0001.58AVG = 0.997-0.521 0.5057 16699.442 705.210 5.76855 59 61 56 56 589.001.2 5.96866.07461.0181.532 0.5057 16705.210 710.990 5.78060 61 62 56 57 599.001.2 5.96956.04531.0131.553 0.5057 16710.990 716.767 5.77761 62 64 57 58 60.25 9.001.2 5.95216.03951.0151.54AVG = 1.0151.281 0.3367 16716.767 722.024 5.25762 64 65 58 60 61.75 12.00 0.53 5.39205.35640.9931.532 0.3367 16722.024 727.285 5.26162 65 66 60 61 6312.00 0.53 5.38325.35640.9951.533 0.3367 16727.285 732.552 5.26763 66 67 61 63 64.25 12.00 0.53 5.37645.35130.9951.53AVG = 0.995-0.76AVERAGE DRY GAS METER CALIBRATION FACTOR, Y =1.002AVERAGE∆H@=1.55(1)=Net volume of gas sample passed through DGM, corrected to standard conditionsK1=17.64oR/in. Hg (English), 0.3858oK/mm Hg (Metric)Tm=Absolute DGM avg. temperature (oR - English,oK - Metric)∆H@=0.75θ∆H Vm(std)Vcr(std)Vm(2)=Volume of gas sample passed through the critical orifice, corrected to standard conditionsTamb=Absolute ambient temperature (oR - English,oK - Metric)K' = Average K' factor from Critical Orifice Calibration(3)=DGM calibration factor321812ENVIRONMENTAL SUPPLY COMPANYUSING THE CRITICAL ORIFICES AS CALIBRATION STANDARDS:The following equations are used to calculate the standard volumes of air passed through the DGM, Vm(std), and the criticalorifice, Vcr(std), and the DGM calibration factor, Y. These equations are automatically calculated in the spreadsheet above.()2()TmHPbarVmKVmstd)6.13/(1)(∆+∗∗=TambPbarKVcrstdΘ∗∗=')()()(stdstdVmVcrY=Meter box 5 cals

# Appendix D

Laboratory Analytical ResultsAcetoneRinseVolume(mL)ParticulateWeight inAcetoneRinse (mg)ParticulateWeight onFilter (mg)ParticulateWeight inAcetoneRinse (mg)CombinedParticulateWeight(mg)Run 1873.80.063.63.9Run 2892.00.061.82.1Run 3952.70.062.52.8Blank240 0.5 0.06Note:Run detection limits of 0.3 mg on the filter were used.Method 5 PM Lab ResultsCorrectedSampling Date: January 23-26, 2012BTEC job #11-4191.05Winder, Georgia Line 105Johns ManvilleAcetoneRinseVolume(mL)ParticulateWeight inAcetoneRinse (mg)ParticulateWeight onFilter (mg)ParticulateWeight inAcetoneRinse (mg)CombinedParticulateWeight(mg)Run 1120 3.6 0.06 3.43.7Run 2120 2.9 0.10 2.73.0Run 3876.20.066.06.3Blank240 0.5 0.06Note:Run detection limits of 0.3 mg on the filter were used.Method 5 PM Lab ResultsCorrectedSampling Date: January 23 and 26, 2012BTEC job #11-4191.05Winder, GeorgiaJohns ManvilleCompound/FractionBlankFilterResult(μg)BlankFilterDetectionLimit(μg)Run 1Result(μg)Run 2Result(μg)Run 3Result(μg)Test RunDetectionLimit(μg)Run 1(μg)Run 2(μg)Run 3(μg)Back Half Chromium (Vaporous) 1.11 0.151.04 1.12 0.970.150.15 0.15 0.15Front Half Chromium (Filterable) 1.56 0.303.34 7.67 4.230.601.78 6.11 2.67Note:For Runs 1, 2, and 3, the test run detection limit of 0.15 μg was used for the back half result.Johns ManvilleMethod 29 Lab ResultsCorrectedSampling Date: January 23 and 26, 2012BTEC job #11-4191.05Winder, GeorgiaCorrectedTotal Volume(ml)Impinger KOH(ml)HexavalentChromium,Cr6+ [μg] RDLHexavalentChromium,Cr6+ [μg]Run 19376570.80 0.300.36Run 210437730.80 0.400.40Run 39526720.60 0.300.30Blank KOH6000.40 0.20CorrectedTotal Volume(ml)Impinger KOH(ml)Back HalfChromium(μg)Back HalfRDLFront HalfChromium(μg)Front HalfRDLRinseChromium(μg)RinseRDLTotalChromium,Cr [μg]Run 19376572.004.000.200.30 1.00 2.006.30Run 210437733.005.000.200.30 1.00 2.007.30Run 39526722.004.000.900.30 1.00 2.006.90Blank KOH600 1.00 2.00 0.20 0.30 1.00 2.00Note: No blank correction applied. RDL used for all fractions except Run 3 front half.Method 0061 Lab ResultsSampling Date: January 23 and 26, 2012BTEC job #11-4191.05Winder, GeorgiaJohns Manville

# Your Project #: 11-4191.05

Site Location: JM WINDER - LINE 105 & 106

Attention: Barry

Boulianne

BT Environmental Consulting

4949 Fernlee Avenue

Royal Oak, MI

USA 48073

Report Date: 2012/02/10



# CERTIFICATE

OF ANALYSIS

MAXXAM JOB #: B213471

Received: 2012/01/28, 11:35

Sample Matrix: Stack Sampling Train

# Samples Received: 8

Date Date Method

Analyses Quantity Extracted Analyzed Laboratory Method Reference

Hexavalent Chromium (M0061) 8 2012/02/01 2012/02/01 BRL SOP-00106 EPA 7199 (M0061)

Chromium on Filter by ICP 7 2012/02/03 2012/02/03 CAM SOP-00408 / BRL EPA M0061

SOP-00102

Chromium in Impinger by ICP 8 2012/02/03 2012/02/04 CAM SOP-00408 / BRL EPA M0061

SOP-00102

Chromium in Train Rinse by ICP 7 2012/02/03 2012/02/04 CAM SOP-00408 / BRL EPA M0061

SOP-00102

Final Volume of KOH Impinger 8 N/A 2012/02/01

Final Volume of Train Rinse 7 N/A 2012/02/03

* RPDs calculated using raw data. The rounding of final results may result in the apparent difference.

U = Undetected at the limit of quantitation.

J = Estimated concentration between the EDL & RDL.

B = Blank Contamination.

Q = One or more quality control criteria failed.



# Encryption Key

Please direct all questions regarding this Certificate of Analysis to your Project Manager.

CLAYTON JOHNSON, Project Manager

Email: CJohnson@maxxam.ca

Phone# (905) 817-5769

==================================================================== Maxxam has procedures in place to guard against improper use of the electronic signature and have the required "signatories", as per section

5.10.2 of ISO/IEC 17025:2005(E), signing the reports. For Service Group specific validation please refer to the Validation Signature Page.

Total cover pages: 1

Page 1 of 8

# BT Environmental Consulting

Maxxam Job #: B213471 Client Project #: 11-4191.05

Report Date: 2012/02/10 Site Location: JM WINDER - LINE 105 & 106



# RESULTS OF ANALYSES OF STACK SAMPLING TRAIN

Maxxam ID M J 5 2 8 3 M J 5 2 8 4 M J 5 2 8 5 M J 5 2 8 5 M J 5 2 8 6

Sampling Date 2012/01/26 2012/01/26 2012/01/25 2012/01/25 2012/01/26

U n i t s BLANK BLANK-M0061 RDL RUN RUN RUN RDL QC Batch

H20-M0061 1-105-M0061 1-105-M0061 2-105-M0061

Lab-Dup

Potassium Hydroxide Volume ml 411 300 1 696 646 1 2751510

Rinse Volume ml 300 1 220 230 1 2754786

Hexavalent Chromium (Cr 6+) ug 0.03 U 0.4 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.3 2752204

RDL = Reportable Detection Limit

QC Batch = Quality Control Batch

Maxxam ID M J 5 2 8 7 M J 5 2 8 8 M J 5 2 8 9 M J 5 2 9 0

Sampling Date 2012/01/26 2012/01/23 2012/01/24 2012/01/24

U n i t s RUN RDL RUN RDL RUN RDL RUN RDL QC Batch

3-105-M0061 1-106-M0061 2-106-M0061 3-106-M0061

Potassium Hydroxide Volume ml 713 1 657 1 773 1 672 1 2751510

Rinse Volume ml 230 1 280 1 270 1 280 1 2754786

Hexavalent Chromium (Cr 6+) ug 0.29 J 0.4 0.8 0.3 0.8 0.4 0.6 0.3 2752204

RDL = Reportable Detection Limit

QC Batch = Quality Control Batch

Page 2 of 8

# BT Environmental Consulting

Maxxam Job #: B213471 Client Project #: 11-4191.05

Report Date: 2012/02/10 Site Location: JM WINDER - LINE 105 & 106



# ELEMENTS BY ICP-AES (STACK SAMPLING TRAIN)

Maxxam ID M J 5 2 8 3 M J 5 2 8 4 M J 5 2 8 5 M J 5 2 8 5 M J 5 2 8 6

Sampling Date 2012/01/26 2012/01/26 2012/01/25 2012/01/25 2012/01/26

U n i t s BLANK BLANK-M0061 RDL RUN RUN RUN RDL QC Batch

H20-M0061 1-105-M0061 1-105-M0061 2-105-M0061

Lab-Dup

Back Half Chromium (Cr) ug 1 U 1 U 2 2 U 2 U 2 U 4 2754781

Front Half Chromium (Cr) ug 0.2 U 0.3 0.2 U 0.2 U 0.2 U 0.3 2754784

Rinse Chromium (Cr) ug 1 U 2 0.5 U 0.5 U 0.5 U 1 2754785

RDL = Reportable Detection Limit

QC Batch = Quality Control Batch

Maxxam ID M J 5 2 8 7 M J 5 2 8 8 M J 5 2 8 9 M J 5 2 9 0

Sampling Date 2012/01/26 2012/01/23 2012/01/24 2012/01/24

U n i t s RUN RDL RUN RDL RUN RDL RUN RDL QC Batch

3-105-M0061 1-106-M0061 2-106-M0061 3-106-M0061

Back Half Chromium (Cr) ug 2 U 4 2 U 4 3 U 5 2 U 4 2754781

Front Half Chromium (Cr) ug 0.2 U 0.3 0.2 U 0.3 0.2 U 0.3 0.9 0.3 2754784

Rinse Chromium (Cr) ug 0.5 U 1 1 U 2 1 U 2 1 U 2 2754785

RDL = Reportable Detection Limit

QC Batch = Quality Control Batch

Page 3 of 8

# BT Environmental Consulting

Maxxam Job #: B213471 Client Project #: 11-4191.05

Report Date: 2012/02/10 Site Location: JM WINDER - LINE 105 & 106



# Test Summary

Maxxam ID MJ5283 Collected 2012/01/26

Sample ID BLANK H20-M0061 Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2012/01/28

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Hexavalent Chromium (M0061) IC/SPEC 2752204 2012/02/01 2012/02/01 LANG LE

Chromium in Impinger by ICP ICP 2754781 2012/02/03 2012/02/04 SUBAN KANAPATHIPPLLAI

Final Volume of KOH Impinger 2751510 N/A 2012/02/01 FRANK MO

Maxxam ID MJ5284 Collected 2012/01/26

Sample ID BLANK-M0061 Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2012/01/28

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Hexavalent Chromium (M0061) IC/SPEC 2752204 2012/02/01 2012/02/01 LANG LE

Chromium on Filter by ICP ICP 2754784 2012/02/03 2012/02/03 SUBAN KANAPATHIPPLLAI

Chromium in Impinger by ICP ICP 2754781 2012/02/03 2012/02/04 SUBAN KANAPATHIPPLLAI

Chromium in Train Rinse by ICP ICP 2754785 2012/02/03 2012/02/04 SUBAN KANAPATHIPPLLAI

Final Volume of KOH Impinger 2751510 N/A 2012/02/01 FRANK MO

Final Volume of Train Rinse 2754786 N/A 2012/02/03 FRANK MO

Maxxam ID MJ5285 Collected 2012/01/25

Sample ID RUN 1-105-M0061 Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2012/01/28

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Hexavalent Chromium (M0061) IC/SPEC 2752204 2012/02/01 2012/02/01 LANG LE

Chromium on Filter by ICP ICP 2754784 2012/02/03 2012/02/03 SUBAN KANAPATHIPPLLAI

Chromium in Impinger by ICP ICP 2754781 2012/02/03 2012/02/04 SUBAN KANAPATHIPPLLAI

Chromium in Train Rinse by ICP ICP 2754785 2012/02/03 2012/02/04 SUBAN KANAPATHIPPLLAI

Final Volume of KOH Impinger 2751510 N/A 2012/02/01 FRANK MO

Final Volume of Train Rinse 2754786 N/A 2012/02/03 FRANK MO

Maxxam ID MJ5285 D u p Collected 2012/01/25

Sample ID RUN 1-105-M0061 Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2012/01/28

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Hexavalent Chromium (M0061) IC/SPEC 2752204 2012/02/01 2012/02/01 LANG LE

Chromium on Filter by ICP ICP 2754784 2012/02/03 2012/02/03 SUBAN KANAPATHIPPLLAI

Chromium in Impinger by ICP ICP 2754781 2012/02/03 2012/02/04 SUBAN KANAPATHIPPLLAI

Chromium in Train Rinse by ICP ICP 2754785 2012/02/03 2012/02/04 SUBAN KANAPATHIPPLLAI

Maxxam ID MJ5286 Collected 2012/01/26

Sample ID RUN 2-105-M0061 Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2012/01/28

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Hexavalent Chromium (M0061) IC/SPEC 2752204 2012/02/01 2012/02/01 LANG LE

Chromium on Filter by ICP ICP 2754784 2012/02/03 2012/02/03 SUBAN KANAPATHIPPLLAI

Chromium in Impinger by ICP ICP 2754781 2012/02/03 2012/02/04 SUBAN KANAPATHIPPLLAI

Chromium in Train Rinse by ICP ICP 2754785 2012/02/03 2012/02/04 SUBAN KANAPATHIPPLLAI

Final Volume of KOH Impinger 2751510 N/A 2012/02/01 FRANK MO

Final Volume of Train Rinse 2754786 N/A 2012/02/03 FRANK MO

Page 4 of 8

# BT Environmental Consulting

Maxxam Job #: B213471 Client Project #: 11-4191.05

Report Date: 2012/02/10 Site Location: JM WINDER - LINE 105 & 106



# Test Summary

Maxxam ID MJ5287 Collected 2012/01/26

Sample ID RUN 3-105-M0061 Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2012/01/28

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Hexavalent Chromium (M0061) IC/SPEC 2752204 2012/02/01 2012/02/01 LANG LE

Chromium on Filter by ICP ICP 2754784 2012/02/03 2012/02/03 SUBAN KANAPATHIPPLLAI

Chromium in Impinger by ICP ICP 2754781 2012/02/03 2012/02/04 SUBAN KANAPATHIPPLLAI

Chromium in Train Rinse by ICP ICP 2754785 2012/02/03 2012/02/04 SUBAN KANAPATHIPPLLAI

Final Volume of KOH Impinger 2751510 N/A 2012/02/01 FRANK MO

Final Volume of Train Rinse 2754786 N/A 2012/02/03 FRANK MO

Maxxam ID MJ5288 Collected 2012/01/23

Sample ID RUN 1-106-M0061 Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2012/01/28

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Hexavalent Chromium (M0061) IC/SPEC 2752204 2012/02/01 2012/02/01 LANG LE

Chromium on Filter by ICP ICP 2754784 2012/02/03 2012/02/03 SUBAN KANAPATHIPPLLAI

Chromium in Impinger by ICP ICP 2754781 2012/02/03 2012/02/04 SUBAN KANAPATHIPPLLAI

Chromium in Train Rinse by ICP ICP 2754785 2012/02/03 2012/02/04 SUBAN KANAPATHIPPLLAI

Final Volume of KOH Impinger 2751510 N/A 2012/02/01 FRANK MO

Final Volume of Train Rinse 2754786 N/A 2012/02/03 FRANK MO

Maxxam ID MJ5289 Collected 2012/01/24

Sample ID RUN 2-106-M0061 Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2012/01/28

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Hexavalent Chromium (M0061) IC/SPEC 2752204 2012/02/01 2012/02/01 LANG LE

Chromium on Filter by ICP ICP 2754784 2012/02/03 2012/02/03 SUBAN KANAPATHIPPLLAI

Chromium in Impinger by ICP ICP 2754781 2012/02/03 2012/02/04 SUBAN KANAPATHIPPLLAI

Chromium in Train Rinse by ICP ICP 2754785 2012/02/03 2012/02/04 SUBAN KANAPATHIPPLLAI

Final Volume of KOH Impinger 2751510 N/A 2012/02/01 FRANK MO

Final Volume of Train Rinse 2754786 N/A 2012/02/03 FRANK MO

Maxxam ID MJ5290 Collected 2012/01/24

Sample ID RUN 3-106-M0061 Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2012/01/28

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Hexavalent Chromium (M0061) IC/SPEC 2752204 2012/02/01 2012/02/01 LANG LE

Chromium on Filter by ICP ICP 2754784 2012/02/03 2012/02/03 SUBAN KANAPATHIPPLLAI

Chromium in Impinger by ICP ICP 2754781 2012/02/03 2012/02/04 SUBAN KANAPATHIPPLLAI

Chromium in Train Rinse by ICP ICP 2754785 2012/02/03 2012/02/04 SUBAN KANAPATHIPPLLAI

Final Volume of KOH Impinger 2751510 N/A 2012/02/01 FRANK MO

Final Volume of Train Rinse 2754786 N/A 2012/02/03 FRANK MO

Page 5 of 8

# BT Environmental Consulting

Maxxam Job #: B213471 Client Project #: 11-4191.05

Report Date: 2012/02/10 Site Location: JM WINDER - LINE 105 & 106

GENERAL COMMENTS

Results relate only to the items tested.

Page 6 of 8

# BT Environmental Consulting

Attention: Barry Boulianne

Client Project #: 11-4191.05

P.O. #:

Site Location: JM WINDER - LINE 105 & 106



# Quality Assurance Report

Maxxam Job Number: GB213471

QA/QC Date

Batch Analyzed

Num Init QC Type Parameter yyyy/mm/dd Value %Recovery Units QC Limits

2752204 LLE Matrix Spike

(MJ5285) Hexavalent Chromium (Cr 6+) 2012/02/01 113 % 80 - 120

Spiked Blank Hexavalent Chromium (Cr 6+) 2012/02/01 95 % 90 - 110

Method Blank Hexavalent Chromium (Cr 6+) 2012/02/01 0.03 U, MDL=0.03 ug

RPD -

Sample/Sample

Dup Hexavalent Chromium (Cr 6+) 2012/02/01 NC % 20

2754781 SUK Matrix Spike

(MJ5285) Back Half Chromium (Cr) 2012/02/04 97 % 80 - 120

Matrix Spike DUP

(MJ5285) Back Half Chromium (Cr) 2012/02/04 95 % 80 - 120

MS/MSD RPD Back Half Chromium (Cr) 2012/02/04 1.6 % 20

Spiked Blank Back Half Chromium (Cr) 2012/02/04 96 % 90 - 110

Spiked Blank DUP Back Half Chromium (Cr) 2012/02/04 95 % 90 - 110

RPD Back Half Chromium (Cr) 2012/02/04 1.6 % 20

Method Blank Back Half Chromium (Cr) 2012/02/04 0.3 U, MDL=0.3 ug

RPD -

Sample/Sample

Dup Back Half Chromium (Cr) 2012/02/04 NC % 20

2754784 SUK Matrix Spike

(MJ5285) Front Half Chromium (Cr) 2012/02/03 108 % 80 - 120

Spiked Blank Front Half Chromium (Cr) 2012/02/03 105 % 90 - 110

Spiked Blank DUP Front Half Chromium (Cr) 2012/02/03 106 % 90 - 110

RPD Front Half Chromium (Cr) 2012/02/03 0.6 % 20

Method Blank Front Half Chromium (Cr) 2012/02/03 0.2 U, MDL=0.2 ug

RPD -

Sample/Sample

Dup Front Half Chromium (Cr) 2012/02/03 NC % 20

2754785 SUK Matrix Spike

(MJ5285) Rinse Chromium (Cr) 2012/02/04 102 % 80 - 120

Matrix Spike DUP

(MJ5285) Rinse Chromium (Cr) 2012/02/04 103 % 80 - 120

MS/MSD RPD Rinse Chromium (Cr) 2012/02/04 1.4 % 20

Spiked Blank Rinse Chromium (Cr) 2012/02/04 103 % 90 - 110

Spiked Blank DUP Rinse Chromium (Cr) 2012/02/04 102 % 90 - 110

RPD Rinse Chromium (Cr) 2012/02/04 0.4 % 20

Method Blank Rinse Chromium (Cr) 2012/02/04 0.3 U, MDL=0.3 ug

RPD -

Sample/Sample

Dup Rinse Chromium (Cr) 2012/02/04 NC % 20

Duplicate: Paired analysis of a separate portion of the same sample. Used to evaluate the variance in the measurement.

Matrix Spike: A sample to which a known amount of the analyte of interest has been added. Used to evaluate sample matrix interference.

Spiked Blank: A blank matrix to which a known amount of the analyte has been added. Used to evaluate analyte recovery.

Method Blank: A blank matrix containing all reagents used in the analytical procedure. Used to identify laboratory contamination.

NC (RPD): The RPD was not calculated. The level of analyte detected in the parent sample and its duplicate was not sufficiently significant to permit a

reliable calculation.

Page 7 of 8

# Validation Signature Page

Maxxam Job #: B213471

The analytical data and all QC contained in this report were reviewed and validated by the following individual(s).

FRANK MO, B.Sc., Inorganic Lab. Manager

====================================================================

Maxxam has procedures in place to guard against improper use of the electronic signature and have the required "signatories", as per section 5.10.2 of

ISO/IEC 17025:2005(E), signing the reports. For Service Group specific validation please refer to the Validation Signature Page.

Page 8 of 8

# Your Project #: 11-4191.05

Site Location: JM WINDER - LINE 105 & 106

Attention: Barry

Boulianne

BT Environmental Consulting

4949 Fernlee Avenue

Royal Oak, MI

USA 48073

Report Date: 2012/02/09



# CERTIFICATE

OF ANALYSIS

MAXXAM JOB #: B213506

Received: 2012/01/28, 11:35

Sample Matrix: Stack Sampling Train

# Samples Received: 7

Date Date Method

Analyses Quantity Extracted Analyzed Laboratory Method Reference

Metals B.H. in H2O2/HNO3 Imp.(6020) 7 2012/02/07 2012/02/08 BRL SOP-00103 / BRL EPA 6020 / M29

SOP-00102

Metals F.H. in Filter + Rinses (6020) 7 2012/02/07 2012/02/08 BRL SOP-00103/ BRL EPA 6020 / M29

SOP-00102

Particulates/Acetone Rinse (M5/315/M201) 7 2012/02/01 2012/02/06 BRL SOP-00109 EPA 5/315

Particulates/Filter (M5/315/NJATM1/M201) 7 N/A 2012/02/01 BRL SOP-00109 EPA 5/315/NJATM1

Final Volume of Acetone Probe Rinse 7 N/A 2012/02/02 BRL SOP-00109

* RPDs calculated using raw data. The rounding of final results may result in the apparent difference.

U = Undetected at the limit of quantitation.

J = Estimated concentration between the EDL & RDL.

B = Blank Contamination.

Q = One or more quality control criteria failed.



# Encryption Key

Please direct all questions regarding this Certificate of Analysis to your Project Manager.

CLAYTON JOHNSON, Project Manager

Email: CJohnson@maxxam.ca

Phone# (905) 817-5769

==================================================================== Maxxam has procedures in place to guard against improper use of the electronic signature and have the required "signatories", as per section

5.10.2 of ISO/IEC 17025:2005(E), signing the reports. For Service Group specific validation please refer to the Validation Signature Page.

Total cover pages: 1

Page 1 of 8

# BT Environmental Consulting

Maxxam Job #: B213506 Client Project #: 11-4191.05

Report Date: 2012/02/09 Site Location: JM WINDER - LINE 105 & 106



# RESULTS OF ANALYSES OF STACK SAMPLING TRAIN

Maxxam ID M J 5 3 9 7 M J 5 3 9 8 M J 5 3 9 9 M J 5 4 0 0

Sampling Date 2012/01/23 2012/01/25 2012/01/26 2012/01/26

U n i t s FIELD RUN RUN RUN RDL QC Batch

BLANK-M5/29 1-105-M5/29 2-105-M5/29 3-105-M5/29

Acetone Rinse Particulate Weight in Acetone Rinse mg 0.5 3.8 2.0 2.7 0.5 2752043

Front Half Particulate Weight on Filter mg 0.060 U 0.060 U 0.060 U 0.060 U 0.30 2752042

Acetone Rinse Volume ml 240 87 89 95 1 2752044

RDL = Reportable Detection Limit

QC Batch = Quality Control Batch

Maxxam ID M J 5 4 0 1 M J 5 4 0 2 M J 5 4 0 3

Sampling Date 2012/01/23 2012/01/24 2012/01/24

U n i t s RUN RUN RUN RDL QC Batch

1-106-M5/29 2-106-M5/29 3-106-M5/29

Acetone Rinse Particulate Weight in Acetone Rinse mg 3.6 2.9 6.2 0.5 2752043

Front Half Particulate Weight on Filter mg 0.060 U 0.100 J 0.060 U 0.30 2752042

Acetone Rinse Volume ml 120 120 87 1 2752044

RDL = Reportable Detection Limit

QC Batch = Quality Control Batch

Page 2 of 8

# BT Environmental Consulting

Maxxam Job #: B213506 Client Project #: 11-4191.05

Report Date: 2012/02/09 Site Location: JM WINDER - LINE 105 & 106



# ELEMENTS BY ICP/MS (STACK SAMPLING TRAIN)

Maxxam ID M J 5 3 9 7 M J 5 3 9 8 M J 5 3 9 8 M J 5 3 9 9 M J 5 4 0 0 M J 5 4 0 1

Sampling Date 2012/01/23 2012/01/25 2012/01/25 2012/01/26 2012/01/26 2012/01/23

U n i t s FIELD RDL RUN RUN RUN RUN RUN RDL QC Batch

BLANK-M5/29 1-105-M5/29 1-105-M5/29 2-105-M5/29 3-105-M5/29 1-106-M5/29

Lab-Dup

Back Half Chromium (Cr) ug 1.11 0.15 0.86 0.89 1.07 1.20 1.04 0.15 2757470

Front Half Chromium (Cr) ug 1.56 0.30 4.82 4.88 2.78 2.08 3.34 0.60 2757471

RDL = Reportable Detection Limit

QC Batch = Quality Control Batch

Maxxam ID M J 5 4 0 2 M J 5 4 0 3

Sampling Date 2012/01/24 2012/01/24

U n i t s RUN RUN RDL QC Batch

2-106-M5/29 3-106-M5/29

Back Half Chromium (Cr) ug 1.12 0.97 0.15 2757470

Front Half Chromium (Cr) ug 7.67 4.23 0.60 2757471

RDL = Reportable Detection Limit

QC Batch = Quality Control Batch

Page 3 of 8

# BT Environmental Consulting

Maxxam Job #: B213506 Client Project #: 11-4191.05

Report Date: 2012/02/09 Site Location: JM WINDER - LINE 105 & 106



# Test Summary

Maxxam ID MJ5397 Collected 2012/01/23

Sample ID FIELD BLANK-M5/29 Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2012/01/28

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Metals B.H. in H2O2/HNO3 Imp.(6020) ICP1/MS 2757470 2012/02/07 2012/02/08 NAN RAYKHA

Metals F.H. in Filter + Rinses (6020) ICP1/MS 2757471 2012/02/07 2012/02/08 NAN RAYKHA

Particulates/Acetone Rinse (M5/315/M201) BAL 2752043 2012/02/01 2012/02/06 BRENDA MOORE

Particulates/Filter (M5/315/NJATM1/M201) BAL 2752042 N/A 2012/02/01 BRENDA MOORE

Final Volume of Acetone Probe Rinse 2752044 N/A 2012/02/02 BRENDA MOORE

Maxxam ID MJ5398 Collected 2012/01/25

Sample ID RUN 1-105-M5/29 Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2012/01/28

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Metals B.H. in H2O2/HNO3 Imp.(6020) ICP1/MS 2757470 2012/02/07 2012/02/08 NAN RAYKHA

Metals F.H. in Filter + Rinses (6020) ICP1/MS 2757471 2012/02/07 2012/02/08 NAN RAYKHA

Particulates/Acetone Rinse (M5/315/M201) BAL 2752043 2012/02/01 2012/02/06 BRENDA MOORE

Particulates/Filter (M5/315/NJATM1/M201) BAL 2752042 N/A 2012/02/01 BRENDA MOORE

Final Volume of Acetone Probe Rinse 2752044 N/A 2012/02/02 BRENDA MOORE

Maxxam ID MJ5398 D u p Collected 2012/01/25

Sample ID RUN 1-105-M5/29 Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2012/01/28

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Metals B.H. in H2O2/HNO3 Imp.(6020) ICP1/MS 2757470 2012/02/09 2012/02/08 NAN RAYKHA

Metals F.H. in Filter + Rinses (6020) ICP1/MS 2757471 2012/02/09 2012/02/08 NAN RAYKHA

Maxxam ID MJ5399 Collected 2012/01/26

Sample ID RUN 2-105-M5/29 Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2012/01/28

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Metals B.H. in H2O2/HNO3 Imp.(6020) ICP1/MS 2757470 2012/02/07 2012/02/08 NAN RAYKHA

Metals F.H. in Filter + Rinses (6020) ICP1/MS 2757471 2012/02/07 2012/02/08 NAN RAYKHA

Particulates/Acetone Rinse (M5/315/M201) BAL 2752043 2012/02/01 2012/02/06 BRENDA MOORE

Particulates/Filter (M5/315/NJATM1/M201) BAL 2752042 N/A 2012/02/01 BRENDA MOORE

Final Volume of Acetone Probe Rinse 2752044 N/A 2012/02/02 BRENDA MOORE

Maxxam ID MJ5400 Collected 2012/01/26

Sample ID RUN 3-105-M5/29 Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2012/01/28

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Metals B.H. in H2O2/HNO3 Imp.(6020) ICP1/MS 2757470 2012/02/07 2012/02/08 NAN RAYKHA

Metals F.H. in Filter + Rinses (6020) ICP1/MS 2757471 2012/02/07 2012/02/08 NAN RAYKHA

Particulates/Acetone Rinse (M5/315/M201) BAL 2752043 2012/02/01 2012/02/06 BRENDA MOORE

Particulates/Filter (M5/315/NJATM1/M201) BAL 2752042 N/A 2012/02/01 BRENDA MOORE

Final Volume of Acetone Probe Rinse 2752044 N/A 2012/02/02 BRENDA MOORE

Page 4 of 8

# BT Environmental Consulting

Maxxam Job #: B213506 Client Project #: 11-4191.05

Report Date: 2012/02/09 Site Location: JM WINDER - LINE 105 & 106



# Test Summary

Maxxam ID MJ5401 Collected 2012/01/23

Sample ID RUN 1-106-M5/29 Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2012/01/28

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Metals B.H. in H2O2/HNO3 Imp.(6020) ICP1/MS 2757470 2012/02/07 2012/02/08 NAN RAYKHA

Metals F.H. in Filter + Rinses (6020) ICP1/MS 2757471 2012/02/07 2012/02/08 NAN RAYKHA

Particulates/Acetone Rinse (M5/315/M201) BAL 2752043 2012/02/01 2012/02/06 BRENDA MOORE

Particulates/Filter (M5/315/NJATM1/M201) BAL 2752042 N/A 2012/02/01 BRENDA MOORE

Final Volume of Acetone Probe Rinse 2752044 N/A 2012/02/02 BRENDA MOORE

Maxxam ID MJ5402 Collected 2012/01/24

Sample ID RUN 2-106-M5/29 Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2012/01/28

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Metals B.H. in H2O2/HNO3 Imp.(6020) ICP1/MS 2757470 2012/02/07 2012/02/08 NAN RAYKHA

Metals F.H. in Filter + Rinses (6020) ICP1/MS 2757471 2012/02/07 2012/02/08 NAN RAYKHA

Particulates/Acetone Rinse (M5/315/M201) BAL 2752043 2012/02/01 2012/02/06 BRENDA MOORE

Particulates/Filter (M5/315/NJATM1/M201) BAL 2752042 N/A 2012/02/01 BRENDA MOORE

Final Volume of Acetone Probe Rinse 2752044 N/A 2012/02/02 BRENDA MOORE

Maxxam ID MJ5403 Collected 2012/01/24

Sample ID RUN 3-106-M5/29 Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2012/01/28

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Metals B.H. in H2O2/HNO3 Imp.(6020) ICP1/MS 2757470 2012/02/07 2012/02/08 NAN RAYKHA

Metals F.H. in Filter + Rinses (6020) ICP1/MS 2757471 2012/02/07 2012/02/08 NAN RAYKHA

Particulates/Acetone Rinse (M5/315/M201) BAL 2752043 2012/02/01 2012/02/06 BRENDA MOORE

Particulates/Filter (M5/315/NJATM1/M201) BAL 2752042 N/A 2012/02/01 BRENDA MOORE

Final Volume of Acetone Probe Rinse 2752044 N/A 2012/02/02 BRENDA MOORE

Page 5 of 8

# BT Environmental Consulting

Maxxam Job #: B213506 Client Project #: 11-4191.05

Report Date: 2012/02/09 Site Location: JM WINDER - LINE 105 & 106

RESULTS OF ANALYSES OF STACK SAMPLING TRAIN

Particulates/Filter (M5/315/NJATM1/M201): Negative results observed

ELEMENTS BY ICP/MS (STACK SAMPLING TRAIN)

Metals B.H. in H2O2/HNO3 Imp.(6020): Post digestion duplicate and spike was done on sample MJ5398.

Metals F.H. in Filter + Rinses (6020): Extra 2x dilution was required for all samples except MJ5397, due to the matrix

Post digestion duplicate and spike was done on sample MJ5398.

Results relate only to the items tested.

Page 6 of 8

# BT Environmental Consulting

Attention: Barry Boulianne

Client Project #: 11-4191.05

P.O. #:

Site Location: JM WINDER - LINE 105 & 106



# Quality Assurance Report

Maxxam Job Number: GB213506

QA/QC Date

Batch Analyzed

Num Init QC Type Parameter yyyy/mm/dd Value %Recovery Units QC Limits

2752043 RSU Method Blank Acetone Rinse Particulate Weight in Acetone 2012/02/06 0.1 J, MDL=0.1 mg

2757470 N_R Matrix Spike

(MJ5398) Back Half Chromium (Cr) 2012/02/08 99 % 70 - 130

Matrix Spike DUP

(MJ5398) Back Half Chromium (Cr) 2012/02/08 101 % 70 - 130

MS/MSD RPD Back Half Chromium (Cr) 2012/02/08 2.0 % 20

Spiked Blank Back Half Chromium (Cr) 2012/02/08 108 % 85 - 115

Spiked Blank DUP Back Half Chromium (Cr) 2012/02/08 102 % 85 - 115

RPD Back Half Chromium (Cr) 2012/02/08 6.0 % 20

Method Blank Back Half Chromium (Cr) 2012/02/08 0.070 U, MDL=0.070 ug

Method Blank DUP Back Half Chromium (Cr) 2012/02/08 0.070 U, MDL=0.070 ug

RPD Back Half Chromium (Cr) 2012/02/08 NC % 20

RPD -

Sample/Sample

Dup Back Half Chromium (Cr) 2012/02/08 3.1 % 20

2757471 N_R Matrix Spike

(MJ5398) Front Half Chromium (Cr) 2012/02/08 104 % 70 - 130

Matrix Spike DUP

(MJ5398) Front Half Chromium (Cr) 2012/02/08 104 % 70 - 130

MS/MSD RPD Front Half Chromium (Cr) 2012/02/08 0 % 20

Spiked Blank Front Half Chromium (Cr) 2012/02/08 100 % 85 - 115

Spiked Blank DUP Front Half Chromium (Cr) 2012/02/08 101 % 85 - 115

RPD Front Half Chromium (Cr) 2012/02/08 1.7 % 20

Method Blank Front Half Chromium (Cr) 2012/02/08 0.10 U, MDL=0.10 ug

Method Blank DUP Front Half Chromium (Cr) 2012/02/08 0.10 U, MDL=0.10 ug

RPD Front Half Chromium (Cr) 2012/02/08 NC % 20

RPD -

Sample/Sample

Dup Front Half Chromium (Cr) 2012/02/08 1.4 % 20

Duplicate: Paired analysis of a separate portion of the same sample. Used to evaluate the variance in the measurement.

Matrix Spike: A sample to which a known amount of the analyte of interest has been added. Used to evaluate sample matrix interference.

Spiked Blank: A blank matrix to which a known amount of the analyte has been added. Used to evaluate analyte recovery.

Method Blank: A blank matrix containing all reagents used in the analytical procedure. Used to identify laboratory contamination.

NC (RPD): The RPD was not calculated. The level of analyte detected in the parent sample and its duplicate was not sufficiently significant to permit a

reliable calculation.

Page 7 of 8

# Validation Signature Page

Maxxam Job #: B213506

The analytical data and all QC contained in this report were reviewed and validated by the following individual(s).

FRANK MO, B.Sc., Inorganic Lab. Manager

====================================================================

Maxxam has procedures in place to guard against improper use of the electronic signature and have the required "signatories", as per section 5.10.2 of

ISO/IEC 17025:2005(E), signing the reports. For Service Group specific validation please refer to the Validation Signature Page.

Page 8 of 8