alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 33 (Thursday, February 19, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 8921]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-03497]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 9042]

Culturally Significant Objects Imported for Exhibition 
Determinations: ``Ships, Clocks & Stars: The Quest for Longitude''

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: 
Pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 
(79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), Executive Order 12047 of March 27, 
1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 
Stat. 2681, et seq.; 22 U.S.C. 6501 note, et seq.), Delegation of 
Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, and Delegation of Authority No. 
236-3 of August 28, 2000 (and, as appropriate, Delegation of Authority 
No. 257 of April 15, 2003), I hereby determine that the objects to be 
included in the exhibition ``Ships, Clocks & Stars: The Quest for 
Longitude,'' imported from abroad for temporary exhibition within the 
United States, are of cultural significance. The objects are imported 
pursuant to loan agreements with the foreign owners or custodians. I 
also determine that the exhibition or display of the exhibit objects at 
the Folger Shakespeare Library, Washington, DC, from on or about March 
16, 2015, until on or about August 23, 2015, the Mystic Seaport Museum, 
Mystic, Connecticut, from on or about September 14, 2015, until on or 
about March 28, 2016, and at possible additional exhibitions or venues 
yet to be determined, is in the national interest. I have ordered that 
Public Notice of these Determinations be published in the Federal 
Register.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For further information, including a 
list of the imported objects, contact Paul W. Manning, Attorney-
Adviser, Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State 
(telephone: 202-632-6469). The mailing address is U.S. Department of 
State, SA-5, L/PD, Fifth Floor (Suite 5H03), Washington, DC 20522-0505.

    Dated: February 11, 2015.
Kelly Keiderling,
Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary, Bureau of Educational and 
Cultural Affairs, Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2015-03497 Filed 2-18-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-05-P
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                          20,774
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    9,852
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,191
<INVENTORY>                                      2,323
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                35,486
<PP&E>                                          10,368
<DEPRECIATION>                                   4,527
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  44,142
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           10,139
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           110
<OTHER-SE>                                      33,493
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    44,142
<SALES>                                         50,165
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                51,792
<CGS>                                           11,951
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   49,990
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                18,700
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 250
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (15,764)
<INCOME-TAX>                                      (97)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (15,861)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (15,861)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (1.46)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.46)


</TABLE>
United States Court of Appeals

for the Fifth Circuit

No. 19-40930

Summary Calendar

United States of America, 

Plaintiff—Appellee,

versus

Keelon Jmar Senegal, 

Defendant—Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 3:16-CV-163

Before King, Higginson, and Willett, Circuit Judges.

Per Curiam:*

Keelon Jmar Senegal, federal prisoner # 45142-079, appeals the denial 

of his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion in which he challenged his Armed Career 

Criminal Act (ACCA) sentence in light of Johnson v. United States, 576 U.S. 

591 (2015). He argues that he has demonstrated that it is more likely than not 

* Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this 

opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited 

circumstances set forth in 5th Circuit Rule 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

September 30, 2022

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Case: 19-40930 Document: 00516491725 Page: 1 Date Filed: 09/30/2022
No. 19-40930

2

that the district court relied on the residual clause at sentencing and that the 

reliance on the residual clause was not harmless. We do not address the 

Government’s argument, raised for the first time here, that Senegal 

procedurally defaulted his Johnson claim. 

In light of the legal landscape at the time of Senegal’s sentencing, see, 

e.g., United States v. Davis, 487 F.3d 282, 287 (5th Cir. 2007), Senegal has 

met his burden of showing that it is more likely than not that the sentencing 

court relied on the residual clause at sentencing. See United States v. Clay, 

921 F.3d 550, 559 (5th Cir. 2019). However, as we recently held, a Texas 

robbery-by-threat conviction satisfies the ACCA’s elements clause. See

United States v. Garrett, 24 F.4th 485, 489 (5th Cir. 2022). Thus, any reliance 

on the residual clause at sentencing was harmless. See United States v. 

Griffin, 946 F.3d 759, 761-62 (5th Cir. 2020). Senegal’s argument that 

Garrett was wrongly decided is unavailing. See United States v. Montgomery, 

974 F.3d 587, 590 n.4 (5th Cir. 2020), cert. denied, 141 S. Ct. 2823 (2021).

AFFIRMED.

Case: 19-40930 Document: 00516491725 Page: 2 Date Filed: 09/30/2022
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL
EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002



In connection with the Annual Report of
CannaVEST Corp. (the “Registrant”) on Form 10-Q for the three months ended March 31, 2014 (the “Report”),
I, Michael J. Mona, Jr., President and Chief Executive Officer of the Registrant, do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350,
as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



(1) the Report, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and



(2) the information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.



|                    |    
|------------------- | ---
|Dated: May 15, 2014 | By:
|                    |
Exhibit 23

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statements Nos. 333-123524 and 333-197757 on Form S-3 and Registration Statement Nos. 333-104258, 333-123521, 333-165098, 333-165101, 333-54266, 333-64171, 333-64173 and 333-79741 on Form S-8 of our report relating to the consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedule of SurModics, Inc. and subsidiaries dated December 4, 2015, and our report related to the effectiveness of SurModics, Inc.’s and subsidiaries internal control over financial reporting dated December 4, 2015, May 10, 2016 as to the effects of the material weakness described in Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting (Revised), (which report expresses an adverse opinion on the effectiveness of SurModics, Inc.’s internal control over financial reporting because of a material weakness), appearing in this Amendment No. 1 to Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of SurModics, Inc. for the year ended September 30, 2015. 

/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

 

Minneapolis, Minnesota

May 10, 2016
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Finance and Accounting Service Providing payment services for the U.S. Department of Defense

Search
Search

Search

              - 
              - 
              - 
              - 
              - 

-  Military Member		 
-  Retired Military & Annuitant		 
-  Civilian Employee		 
-  Contractor & Vendor		 

HomemilitaryseparationsFinalPay

                        - How to Avoid Debt
                        - How to update your myPay account before separating
                        - When will I get my final pay?
                        - How to get your W2

## When you’ll get paid

When you’ll get your final pay depends on a variety of factors, like when you started the separation process and which service you are separating from.

It’s important to know that if your military pay account is flagged with a debt, you could wait 120 days or more for your final pay check while your account gets audited.

Learn more about separation debt.

### Stay Connected

Department of Defense     Department of Veterans Affairs     Military Employment Verification     Warrior Care Website     Defense Contract Mgmt Agency  DoD Forms     Department of State     Civilian Personnel Mgmt Service     DTS Travel Center     System for Award Mgmt (SAM)    Congressional/LegislationPersonnel Force Innovation     Freedom of Information Act     DFAS Hotline   Contact Us     Accessibility / Section 508    EEO / No Fear Act  

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil
Order entered January 11 , 2023

In The 

### Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05 - 22 - 00558 - CR No. 05 - 22 - 00559 - CR JACOB ANDREW ALBIAR , Appellant

V. THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee On A ppeal from the 194th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. F18 - 56926 - M , F18 - 56927 - M

O RDER The State’s second motion for extension of time to file it s brief is GRANTED , and the brief received January 10 , 2023 is ORDERED filed as of the date of this order.

/s/ ERIN A. NOWELL JUSTICE
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended
March 31, 2014 (the Report) of Solar Senior Capital Ltd. (the Registrant), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, RICHARD L. PETEKA, the Chief Financial Officer of the Registrant,
hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) The information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.

|      |  |                         
|----- |  | ------------------------
|      | 
|      |  | /S/    RICHARD L.
PETEKA
|Name: |  | Richard L. Peteka       
|Date: |  | May 5, 2014
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                             JUN-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                JUL-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                  JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                          312,227
<SECURITIES>                                          0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   344,986
<ALLOWANCES>                                          0
<INVENTORY>                                     363,264
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                              1,086,653
<PP&E>                                          756,584
<DEPRECIATION>                                  508,330
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                1,839,793
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           620,936
<BONDS>                                               0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                 0
<PREFERRED>                                           0
<COMMON>                                        112,833
<OTHER-SE>                                      270,512
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  1,334,907
<SALES>                                         266,351
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                608,608
<CGS>                                           310,526
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                 2,225,556
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                (20,578)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                      0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               50,545
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (1,957,441)
<INCOME-TAX>                                          0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (1,957,441)
<DISCONTINUED>                                        0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                       0
<CHANGES>                                             0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (1,957,441)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.26)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (0.26)



</TABLE>
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 13

- 40834 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee

v.
MIGUEL ANGEL ECHEVARRIA

- JIMENEZ , Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 1:12

- CR

- 962

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DENNIS, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Miguel Angel Echevarria

- Jimenez (Echevarria) appeals the 57

- month sentence imposed following his guilty plea conviction for being unlawfully found in the United St ates after deportation, having previously been convicted of a felony. Echevarria argues that the 16

- level enhancement for being found in the United States after a felony drug trafficking offense was not warranted because his 2008 conviction for possession with intent to deliver a controlled

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED April 15, 2014 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 13-40834 Document: 00512597158 Page: 1 Date Filed: 04/15/2014No. 13

- 40834
substance could have been charged as a misdemeanor under federal law and, as a result, the conviction was n ot a “felony” for purposes of U.S.S.G. § 2L1.2(b)(1). Echevarria also argues that counsel rendered ineffective assistance by failing to argue that the 2008 conviction was not a felony for purposes of § 2L1.2(b)(1). He contends that the appeal waiver in his plea agreement does not preclude him from raising an ineffective assistance of counsel claim on direct appeal

. The Government moves for dismissal because Echevarria’s appeal is barred by the waiver of appeal in the plea agreement. In the alternative, the Government requests an extension of time to file its appellate brief. A review of the record show s that Ech evarria kn owingly and voluntarily waived his right to appeal his sentence, see United States v. Portillo , 18 F.3d 290, 292 (5th Cir. 1994), and that his arguments are barred by the appeal waiver. Therefore, the appeal is DISMISSED. The Government’s alternative motion to extend the time to file its brief is DENIED as moot

.

2 Case: 13-40834 Document: 00512597158 Page: 2 Date Filed: 04/15/2014
II 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 721 

To amend the Communications Act of 1934 to require a provider of a 

commercial mobile service or an IP-enabled voice service to provide call 

location information concerning the user of such a service to law enforcement agencies in order to respond to a call for emergency services 

or in an emergency situation that involves risk of death or serious 

physical harm. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

APRIL 15, 2013 

Mr. ROBERTS (for himself and Mr. MORAN) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, 

Science, and Transportation 

A BILL 

To amend the Communications Act of 1934 to require a 

provider of a commercial mobile service or an IP-enabled 

voice service to provide call location information concerning the user of such a service to law enforcement 

agencies in order to respond to a call for emergency 

services or in an emergency situation that involves risk 

of death or serious physical harm. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Kelsey Smith Act’’. 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 721 IS

1 SEC. 2. REQUIRED DISCLOSURE OF CALL INFORMATION 

2 LOCATION. 

3 Title II of the Communications Act of 1934 (47 

4 U.S.C. 201) is amended by inserting after section 222 the 

5 following new section: 

6 ‘‘SEC. 222A. REQUIRED DISCLOSURE OF CALL LOCATION IN7 FORMATION. 

8 ‘‘(a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding section 222, at 

9 the request of a law enforcement agency, a telecommuni10 cations carrier shall provide call location information con11 cerning the user of a commercial mobile service (as such 

12 term is defined in section 332(d)) or the telecommuni13 cations device of the user of an IP-enabled voice service 

14 (as such term is defined in section 7 of the Wireless Com15 munications and Public Safety Act of 1999 (47 U.S.C. 

16 615b)) to a law enforcement official, in order to respond 

17 to the user’s call for emergency services or to respond to 

18 an emergency situation that involves the risk of death or 

19 serious physical harm. 

20 ‘‘(b) HOLD HARMLESS.—No cause of action shall lie 

21 in any court against any provider of a commercial mobile 

22 service or an IP-enabled voice service, its officers, employ23 ees, or agents for providing call location information under 

24 subsection (a) while acting in good faith and in accordance 

25 with this section and any regulations promulgated pursu26 ant to this section. 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 721 IS

1 ‘‘(c) DEFINITION.—For the purpose of this section, 

2 the term ‘emergency services’ have the meaning given such 

3 term in section 222.’’. 

Æ 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Norman Monroe, Appellant.

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Evaluating the circumstances of this case in light of the five relevant factors identified by the Court of Appeals in *People v Taranovich*(37 NY2d 442), we conclude that defendant was not deprived of his constitutional right to a speedy trial. We note that the extent of the delay was neither unusual nor unreasonable, that defendant was responsible for most of the delay between his arraignment and his motion to dismiss on speedy trial grounds, and that defendant did not allege or establish any prejudice to his defense as a result of the delay in prosecution. (Appeal from Judgment of Oneida County Court, Buckley, J.—Criminal Possession Forged Instrument, 2nd Degree.) Present—Denman, J. P., Boomer, Pine, Lawton and Davis, JJ.
The State of 

Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

August 4, 2015

No. 04-15-00183-CR

Richard LARES,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 399th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2006CR10110

Honorable Juanita A. Vasquez-Gardner, Judge Presiding

ORDER

On July 21, 2015, we granted Appellant’s motion for extension of time to file his pro se 

brief until August 20, 2015. Before Appellant received the order granting his motion, Appellant 

mailed what he describes as an “incomplete” brief. Thereafter, Appellant filed a “Motion for 

Leave to Amend Appellant’s Brief” which we construe as a motion to file a pro se brief.

Appellant’s motion to file a pro se brief is GRANTED. The pro se brief Appellant filed 

on July 30, 2015, is deemed timely filed.

On that date, Appellant also filed a motion to amend his pro se brief in which he seeks 

“permission to file an Amended Pro Se Brief to complete his Appellate Brief.” Appellant’s 

motion is GRANTED. Appellant may file an amended brief—which would completely replace 

his July 30, 2015 brief—or a supplemental brief—which would be added to his July 30, 2015 

brief. Appellant’s amended or supplemental brief must be filed by August 20, 2015.

_________________________________

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 4th day of August, 2015.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
#### Connie J. WIMER, Petitioner, v. The PEOPLE of the State of Colorado, Respondent.

No. 90SC522.

Supreme Court of Colorado, En Banc.

April 25, 1991.

ORDER OF COURT

Upon consideration of the Record on Appeal, together with the Written and Oral Arguments of Counsel, and now being sufficiently advised in the premises,

IT IS THIS DAY ORDERED that the Petition for Writ of Certiorari heretofore *999granted be, and is, DENIED as having been improvidently granted.
<page>	       EXHIBIT 32.01


CERTIFICATION OF PRESIDENT PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Annual Report of Morgan Stanley Spectrum
Strategic L.P. (the ?Partnership?) on Form 10-K for the period
ended December 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the ?Report?), I, Walter Davis,
President of Demeter Management Corporation, the general partner
of the Partnership, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

	(1)		The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

	(2)	The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Partnership.








By:	/s/Walter Davis

Name:	   Walter Davis
Title:	   President

Date:	   March 31, 2009