alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
## IN THE COURT O F CRIMINA L A PPEA LS OF TEXA S

N O . P D
- 1 1 9 9
- 1 7

A N D R E W L E E W I L L I A M S , A p p e l l a n t

v . T H E S T A T E O F T E X A S
O N A P P E L L A N T ’ S P E T I T I O N F O R D I S C R E T I O N A R Y R E V I E W F R O M T H E F O U R T E E N T H C O U R T O F A P P E A L S

B R A Z O R I A C O U N T Y
K E L L E R , P . J . , f

i l e d a c o n c u r r i n g o p i n i o n . The Court corr ectly identifies the iss u e i n this case as whether , in a cer tificate of analy sis under Article 38.41, “someone other than the analy st who conducte d the t es t i n g can serve as the 1 aff iant.” The Court corr ectly answe rs this question “y es.” I do not join the Court’s opinion beca use it addre sses issues that are not befor e us, are not briefe d by the parties, and are not nece ssary to the resolution of the c ase. First, the Court does not need to consider the meaning of “substantial compliance .” Be cause

T E X
. C O D E C R I M
. P R O C . art. 38.41. 1WILLIAMS CONCURRENCE — 2

the only defe ct alleg ed by Appellant is not a defe ct at all, what “substantial compliance ” means has

no bear ing on the outcome of this case . The parties addre ss only § 5 of the statute and not § 3. The Court’s holding that “ substantial compliance” require s satisfy ing a ll seven re quirements set out in § 3 is not an issue addre ssed by the par ties. Second, the Court say s that the cer tificate of analy sis in this case is missing at least one item of information require d by § 3. Ag ain, Appellant has never claimed that the State failed to comply with § 3. Third, even if Appellant had complained in this Co u rt ab o u t § 3, the C ourt conclude s that Appellant forf

eited that claim beca

use he failed to raise it at trial. I f he has forf eited a § 3 claim, we do not need to addr ess the mer its of a § 3 claim. And fi n al l y , it is not clea r to me that the Court’s holding on the meaning of “substantial compliance ” is corr ect. I cannot think of an instance when, under the Court’s holding, “substantial” compliance would not also be full compliance

. And, of course , we have no g uidance from the parties on what “substantial c ompliance” means with re spect to § 3. I ag ree with the Court’s holding that Article 3 8.41 does not require the aff iant to be the analy st. I would not g o further than that holding to comment on matters that are not befor e us. Such
statements ar e dicta

. I concur in the Court’s judgme nt. 2

Filed: Oc tober 9, 2019 Publis h

See State v . Ross , 573 S.W .3d 817, 827 & n.59 ( Tex. Crim . App. 2019).

2
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Intelligence AgencyCOMMITTED TO EXCELLENCE IN DEFENSE OF THE NATION

Search
Search

Search
                    - Facilities Operating Status
                    - Employee Resources

-  Home		 
-  About    -  FAQs             
  -  Organization      -  Locations             
    -  Missile and Space Intelligence Center             
    -  Joint Military Attache School             
    -  Joint Military Intelligence Training Center 
  -  Office of the Inspector General             
  -  Equal Opportunity & Diversity             
  -  Military Integration Office             
  -  History      -  DIA Museum             
    -  George Washington Letters             
    -  Directors of DIA             
    -  The Historians 
  -  Patriots Memorial             
  -  Sexual Assault Prevention and Response             
  -  Contact Us 
-  News & Features    -  Articles             
  -  Videos             
  -  DIA in the News             
  -  Threat Reports             
  -  Photo Gallery             
  -  No FEAR             
  -  Podcasts             
  -  DIA Comics 
-  Careers & Opportunities    -  Career Fields      -  Analysis             
    -  Counterintelligence             
    -  Finance & Acquisition             
    -  Human Intelligence             
    -  Human Services             
    -  Information Technology             
    -  Inspector General             
    -  Legal             
    -  Mission Management             
    -  Office Management & Infrastructure             
    -  Science & Technology             
    -  Security 
  -  Search Vacancies             
  -  Apply to DIA             
  -  Hiring Process             
  -  Internships             
  -  Veteran Programs 
-  Business    -  Contractor Personnel Security             
  -  SIA3             
  -  SITE III             
  -  Innovation             
  -  NeedipeDIA             
  -  Office of Small Business Programs             
  -  Small Business FAQs 

HOMENEWS & FEATURES

Search

Search

                            - All Images 
                            - Other 

                            - Upload Date
                            - Photo Date
                            - Title

Share

----

Download Image: Small ()Medium ()Full Size (0.83 MB)

Tags:

Photo by:VIRIN: 

Photo Gallery
# Defense Intelligence Agency leaders kick-off DoDIIS Worldwide Conference with technology and asymmetric threats

/ Published May 1, 2015

Tampa, Florida – Standing before an audience of more than 2,200 attendees, Defense Intelligence Agency Chief Information Officer Jack Gumtow opened the Department of Defense Intelligence Information Systems Worldwide Conference with a message about modernization and what it means for the intelligence sector.

He explained that in today’s international security environment, the government and intelligence agencies need to be prepared to adapt by identifying key strengths and having a realistic mindset on areas where partnerships with industry can increase resiliency, redundancy and security - the theme of this year’s conference.

“To achieve our goals, we need your help,” Gumtow said. “I need proactive collaboration with our partners. This is a journey, we are moving forward. I need you as my partners, to help me and our collective community to achieve strategic success.”Following Gumtow, DIA Director Lt. Gen. Robert P. Ashley, Jr. reiterated the importance of partnerships and the significance of having allies at the table as systems are being modernized and infrastructure is being built.

Ashley went on to speak about the significance data now plays in everyday life, highlighting that 2.5 quintillion bytes of data is created every single day and the data market is projected to reach $11.52 billion by 2022.

Ashley explained how as data grows, so too does the necessity to process and analyze the growing amount of information in the public domain. This is where open source intelligence and the Machine-assisted Analytic Rapid-repository System play a significant role in the future of intelligence.

“MARS is our shot,” said Ashley. “That flagship capability, speed and scale allows analysts to think and process the information and gives more time to solve problems.”

While serving as an enabling technology, Ashley made a point to say that MARS does not take the individual out of the decision-making loop. Assessments still need to be explained and put into the larger context for policymakers and warfighters to act upon.

Ashley and Gumtow closed the opening plenary with a call to action, highlighting that while there are inherent risks with the increased volume of information, there is also increased access to truth.
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Monroe
Capital Corporation (the “Company”) for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2022, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Theodore L. Koenig, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and I, Aaron
D. Peck, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to
our knowledge:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|Date: May 3, 2022 |                                                               
|----------------- | --------------------------------------------------------------
|                  |                                                               
|                  | /s/ Theodore L. Koenig                                        
|                  | Theodore L. Koenig                                            
|                  | Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and Director                
|                  | (Principal Executive Officer)                                 
|                  | Monroe Capital Corporation                                    
|                  |                                                               
|                  | /s/ Aaron D. Peck                                             
|                  | Aaron D. Peck                                                 
|                  | Chief Financial Officer, Chief Investment Officer and Director
|                  | (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)                  
|                  | Monroe Capital Corporation
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEFFINANCIAL OFFICER**

**PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

I, Wu Ming Ding, certify,as of the dates hereof, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adoptedpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that theQuarterly Report of Verde Resources, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the period ended December 31, 2013 fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Form 10-Q fairlypresents in all material respects the financial condition and results ofoperations of Verde Resources, Inc. at the dates and for the periods indicated.

Date: February 21, 2014 

 

|   |   |                    |
|--------|--------|-------------------------|
| By:    |   | */s/ Wu Ming Ding*      |
|   |   | Wu Ming Ding            |
|   |   | Chief Executive Officer |

I, Balakrishnan B S Muthu,certify, as of the dates hereof, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, asadopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, thatthe Quarterly Report of Verde Resources, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the period endedDecember31,2013 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Form10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition andresults of operations of Verde Resouces, Inc. at the dates and for the periodsindicated. 

Date: February 21, 2014 

 

|   |   |                         |
|--------|--------|------------------------------|
| By:    |   | */s/ Balakrishnan B S Muthu* |
|   |   | Balakrishnan B S Muthu       |
|   |   | Chief Financial Officer      |

A signed original of thiswritten statement required by Section 906 has been provided to VerdeResources, Inc. and will be retained by Verde Resources, Inc. andfurnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### Adams Drug Company, Inc., Appellant, v Franklin Knobel et al., Respondents.

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Stuart C. Cohen, J.), entered on or about October 17, 1990, which found that defendants’ termination of plaintiff’s lease was proper, and dismissed plaintiff’s third and fourth causes of action, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The history of this matter is set forth in our opinion on a prior appeal (129 AD2d 401). On retrial, the court, pursuant to the stipulation of the parties, made its decision based on transcripts, documents, and other submissions of evidence adduced at the prior trial.

Plaintiff failed to meet its burden of proof that defendants’ termination of plaintiff’s tenancy was made in bad faith. The evidence adduced supported the view that defendant decided against rebuilding the premises because of its perceived inability to do so within 120 days, as provided by the lease, and its inability to finance the project. Plaintiff’s reliance upon subsequent statements made by defendants before the Building Department is not dispositive of the issue of defendants’ good faith. The distinct time frames with respect to these admittedly conflicting claims preclude application of the doctrine of estoppel, since defendants have not asserted any inconsistent positions with respect to the issue of good faith as of the time the notice of termination was served. *(See, Kimco of N. Y. v Devon,*163 AD2d 573.)

The Court committed no error in considering the prior trial testimony of defendants, given the stipulation of the parties, and the fact that plaintiff relied upon portions of the testimony of these defendants but omitted other portions. *(Grattan v Metropolitan Life Ins. Co.,*92 NY 274; 57 NY2d Jur 2d, Evidence and Witnesses, § 386.)

Lastly, plaintiff was properly precluded from resurrecting the claim that notice of termination was invalid because executed by an attorney, rather than the owner/landlord. *(Siegel v Kentucky Fried Chicken,*67 NY2d 792.) Plaintiff abandoned this claim when it failed to raise the issue on *471appeal to the Court of Appeals from a prior determination in this matter (64 NY2d 768, *revg*102 AD2d 735; *Matter of Pessano,*269 App Div 337, *affd*296 NY 564). Concur—Sullivan, J. P., Rosenberger, Kupferman, Ross and Smith, JJ.
<PAGE>

                                    EXHIBIT 23.1



                          CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS


                 We consent to the incorporation by reference in the  
Registration Statements (Form S-8 No. 33-96424) pertaining to: (i) AmeriLink 
Corporation 1994 Stock Incentive Plan, (ii) the Stock Option Agreement dated 
as of August 19, 1994, between AmeriLink Corporation and Joseph L. Govern, 
and (iii) the Stock Option Addendum to Executive Employment Agreement dated 
August 19, 1994, between AmeriLink Corporation and Larry R. Linhart and (Form 
S-3 No. 33-96422) pertaining to registration of 100,000 shares of its common 
stock of our report dated May 15, 1998, with respect to the consolidated 
financial statements of AmeriLink Corporation included in its Annual Report 
(Form 10-K) for the year ended March 29, 1998.

                                                         /s/ Ernst & Young LLP
Columbus, Ohio
June 22, 1998
# The JELA Experience

## Joint Enterprise License Agreement

## Fact Sheet 2023

## Benefits of the JELA Experience:

              - Centralized  Governance
              - Enhanced Negotiation Positions
              - Improved Operational Efficiencies
              - Standardized and Reduced Pricing
              - Cost Savings
              - Transferability of Licenses Between Services/Agencies
              - Sharing of Best Practices and Lessons Learned
              - Increased Asset Visibility

              - Builds upon existing strategic sourcing agreements, such as DOD Enterprise Software Initiative
              - Provides established contractual agreements    with set pricing and specific terms and conditions such as: consolidated orders, deeply discounted pricing (due to expansive consolidation and bulk buying power) and committed funding
              - Offers streamlined program and contract management
              - Federal Contracting Officer Representative    structure (per enrollment)

                - ➢Strengthen DoDs Buying ➢Power
                - ➢Price Reductions
                - ➢Access to Faster Product Delivery

                - ➢Consistent Terms & ➢Conditions
                - ➢Reutilization of Commodity
                - ➢Visibility of Spend

                - ➢Process Improvements to ➢Reduce Internal cost
                - ➢Reduced Transactions ➢Improves Ordering ➢Efficiencies
                - ➢Standardized Requirements

## For more information email disa.meade.bd.mbx.disa-jela-team@mail.mil.
- BL_Ecuador-07-09-1993
- BL_Ecuador-09-04-1963
- BL_Ecuador-11-28-1984
**EXHIBIT 13.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

**PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS**

**ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

Inconnection with the Annual Report of Embotelladora Andina S.A (the “Company”)on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009, as filedwith the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,Jaime Garcia, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002, that:

 

(1)                  The Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

(2)                  The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

 

 
| /s/  JAIME GARCIA          |   |
|----------------------------|--------|
| Jaime  García         |   |
| Chief  Executive Officer   |   |
| Embotelladora  Andina S.A. |   |
| Dated:  June 30, 2010 |   |

 

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company andfurnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request. 

 

----
Exhibit 32

Certification of CEO and CFO Pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

as Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the
quarterly report on Form 10-Q of TPG Specialty Lending, Inc. (the Company) for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2014, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), Joshua
Easterly and Michael Fishman, as Co-Chief Executive Officers of the Company, and Alan Kirshenbaum, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to such officers knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                     |  |                           
|-------------------- |  | --------------------------
|/s/ Joshua Easterly 
|Name:                |  | Joshua Easterly           
|Title:               |  | Co-Chief Executive Officer
|Date:                |  | May 8, 2014               
|                    
|/s/ Michael Fishman 
|Name:                |  | Michael Fishman           
|Title:               |  | Co-Chief Executive Officer
|Date:                |  | May 8, 2014               
|                    
|/s/ Alan Kirshenbaum
|Name:                |  | Alan Kirshenbaum          
|Title:               |  | Chief Financial Officer   
|Date:                |  | May 8, 2014               

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350 and is not being
filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk's Office, Atlanta, February 10, 2020.

I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes 

of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto 

affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Court of Appeals 

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA, February 10, 2020

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order

A20I0162. U. S. BANK TRUST NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AS DELAWARE 

TRUSTEE v. CHIEFTAIN ATLANTA, L.P.

Upon consideration of the Application for Interlocutory Appeal, it is ordered that it be 

hereby GRANTED. The Appellant may file a Notice of Appeal within 10 days of the date of 

this order. The Clerk of Superior Court is directed to include a copy of this order in the record 

transmitted to the Court of Appeals.

LC NUMBERS:

18A00283
SCOTTIE D. LOWE,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D13-4567

_____________________________/

Opinion filed May 5, 2015.

An appeal from an order of the Circuit Court for Leon County.

James C. Hankinson, Judge.

Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender, and Steven L. Seliger and Joel Arnold, 

Assistant Public Defenders, Tallahassee, for Appellant; Scottie D. Lowe, pro se, 

Appellant. 

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

WOLF, ROWE, and SWANSON, JJ., CONCUR.
Report on the 

U.S.-Colombia 

Growth Initiative 

May 2022

dfc.gov
REPORT ON THE U.S.-COLOMBIA GROWTH INITIATIVE Page 2

Introduction

August 18, 2020, Colombia and the United States announced the launch of the “United States-Colombia 

Growth Initiative” (USCGI) to unleash economic potential, develop human capital, and strengthen 

security and rule of law. The USCGI was intended to dramatically reduce the flow of cocaine to the 

United States, building on traditional drug interdiction, security, and assistance with a private sector-led 

model of sustainable economic growth and alternative development programs. While this is still a goal 

of the United States Government, it will not utilize the framework under the USCGI to achieve it.

DFC Portfolio in Colombia 

DFC has 33 active projects in Colombia, totaling $1.3 billion. These span sectors such as: oil extraction, 

construction, finance and insurance, forestry, real estate, and telecommunications. Latin American 

Agribusiness Development, a regional lender with half of it’s DFC-funded portfolio in Colombia, will 

remain a key partner as DFC considers opportunities through the USCGI.

Next Steps

With new leadership at DFC, the Corporation looks forward to taking a more expansive view of our 

investment potential in Colombia. These investments are driven by collaboration on specific 

opportunities for supporting catalytic private sector investment in Colombia that advance our shared 

priorities. This will be the final report transmitted by DFC.

DFC is committed to investing in rural Colombia to support development through projects that support 

long-term sustainable growth and prosperity. This includes enabling private sector investment in climate 

mitigation, adaptation, and resilience. DFC will also look to support investments in gender equity, 

financial inclusion, and recovery from COVID-19. The DFC is also looking into identify and invest in 

projects that support the integration of Venezuelan migrants into receptor communities within 

Colombia, particularly through increasing access to sustainable housing and capital for small and 

medium enterprises. 

Building on DFC’s current portfolio of investments in the country, new investments will continue to 

support prosperity, development, and U.S. foreign policy. Additionally, DFC will work closely with the 

U.S Agency for International Development Mission in Colombia to pursue investment in the most 

impactful projects in the most underserved communities in Colombia.