alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Úřední věstník C 33A/8. ú

| | ISSN 1725-5163 |
| --- | --- |
| Úřední věstník
  Evropské unie | C 33A |
| | |
| České vydání | Informace a oznámení | Svazek 488. února 2005 |

ISSN 1725-5163

Úřední věstník

Evropské unie

C 33A

České vydání

Informace a oznámení

Svazek 488. února 2005

---

| Oznámeníč. | Obsah | Strana |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | III   Oznámení |
| | Evropská obranná agentura |
| 2005/C 033A/1 | Oznámení o volných místech | 1 |

Oznámeníč.

Obsah

Strana

III   Oznámení

Evropská obranná agentura

2005/C 033A/1

Oznámení o volných místech

1

| CS | |
| --- | --- |

CS

---

III Oznámení

Evropská obranná agentura

| 8.2.2005 | CS | Úřední věstník Evropské unie | CA 33/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.2.2005

CS

Úřední věstník Evropské unie

CA 33/1

---

OZNÁMENÍ O VOLNÝCH MÍSTECH

(2005/C 33 A/01)

Evropská obranná agentura má v úmyslu přijmout:

| — | pro útvar plánování a politiky

  1 vedoucího asistenta (čj. EDA/A/2005/006) |
| --- | --- |

—

pro útvar plánování a politiky

1 vedoucího asistenta (čj. EDA/A/2005/006)

| — | pro ředitelství pro kapacity

  1 tajemníka/administrativního pracovníka (čj. EDA/A/2005/028) |
| --- | --- |

—

pro ředitelství pro kapacity

1 tajemníka/administrativního pracovníka (čj. EDA/A/2005/028)

| — | pro ředitelství pro vyzbrojování

  1 vedoucího úředníka pro politiku vyzbrojování (čj. EDA/A/2005/045)
  2 vedoucí úředníky pro spolupráci v oblasti vyzbrojování (čj. EDA/A/2005/048 a 049) |
| --- | --- |

—

pro ředitelství pro vyzbrojování

1 vedoucího úředníka pro politiku vyzbrojování (čj. EDA/A/2005/045)

2 vedoucí úředníky pro spolupráci v oblasti vyzbrojování (čj. EDA/A/2005/048 a 049)

| — | pro ředitelství pro průmysl a trh

  1 vedoucího úředníka pro obranný průmysl (čj. EDA/A/2004/054)
  1 vedoucího úředníka pro obranný trh (čj. EDA/A/2004/057)
  1 vedoucího úředníka (čj. EDA/A/2004/58) |
| --- | --- |

—

pro ředitelství pro průmysl a trh

1 vedoucího úředníka pro obranný průmysl (čj. EDA/A/2004/054)

1 vedoucího úředníka pro obranný trh (čj. EDA/A/2004/057)

1 vedoucího úředníka (čj. EDA/A/2004/58)

| — | pro ředitelství pro výzkum a techniku

  4 úředníky pro technické plánování (čj. EDA/A/2005/037, 038, 039 a 040) |
| --- | --- |

—

pro ředitelství pro výzkum a techniku

4 úředníky pro technické plánování (čj. EDA/A/2005/037, 038, 039 a 040)

| — | pro ředitelství pro administrativní služby

  2 úředníky pro smluvní otázky (čj. EDA/A/2005/064 a 065)
  1 vedoucího úředníka — oddělení infrastruktury (čj. EDA/A/2005/074) |
| --- | --- |

—

pro ředitelství pro administrativní služby

2 úředníky pro smluvní otázky (čj. EDA/A/2005/064 a 065)

1 vedoucího úředníka — oddělení infrastruktury (čj. EDA/A/2005/074)

Lhůta: 25. únor 2005, přičemž rozhodující je otisk razítka podací pošty.

Více informací (dostupných v angličtině) a přihlášky lze získat na internetové adrese Rady: http://ue.eu.int (kontakty/nabídka zaměstnání)

---
**Exhibit 31.2**

**CERTIFICATION**

I, Samuel A. Hamood, certify that: 

1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q of TransUnion Corp.; 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessaryto make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cashflows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

4. The registrant’s other certifyingofficer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report ourconclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’sfourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control overfinancial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function): 

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, thatinvolves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

DateMay 9, 2011 

 

 
34
**Exhibit 23.1**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT**

**REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

American Technology Corporation 

San Diego, California 

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Forms S-8 (File No. 333-09265, File No. 333-09269, FileNo. 333-23845, File No. 333-59929, File No 333-54034, File No. 333-101279, File No. 333-125454 and File No. 333-128263) and Forms S-3 (File No. 333-99675, File No. 333-105740, File No. 333-107635, FileNo. 333-127534 and File No. 333-137289) of American Technology Corporation of our report dated January 5, 2007, relating to the consolidated financial statements and consolidated financial schedule and management’s assessment ofthe effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of American Technology Corporation appearing in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year endedSeptember 30, 2006. 

/s/ Swenson Advisors, LLP 

SanDiego, CA 

January 5, 2007
(April 11, 1991)

#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Dennis Brown, Appellant.

Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Sullivan County (Hanofee, J.), rendered October 20, 1989, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crime of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree.

Upon pleading guilty to criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree, defendant was sentenced to a prison term of 2 to 6 years. Defendant’s only contention on appeal is that his sentence is excessive and should be reduced in light of the fact that he had no prior criminal record. Although defendant did not receive the most lenient sentence allowed by statute *(see,*Penal Law § 70.00 [3] [b]), he also did not receive the harshest sentence *(see,*Penal Law § 70.00 [2] [b]). Even more significant, defendant entered his plea knowing that he would receive the sentence ultimately imposed by County Court, and one other charge was dropped as a result of the plea agreement. Under these circumstances, we find no abuse of discretion by County Court in imposing sentence *(see, People v Mackey,*136 AD2d 780, 781, *lv denied*71 NY2d 899; *People v Neira,*130 AD2d 518, *lv denied*70 NY2d 715).

Judgment affirmed. Mahoney, P. J., Weiss, Mikoll, Crew III and Harvey, JJ., concur.
! ‘/1 ,’ 

I ‘. 

c 

0 

P 

Y 

The State of Texas 

OFFICE OF THE ATTOFNEYGENRRAL OF TEXAS 

Austin 

GeraEd.'C. Mann 

AM&nay General 

Eionorabl eFrank D. Quinn 

\i;, ., :; 

jTxeout+ive Secretary 

Texas State Farks Board 

Austin, Texas 

Dear Sir: 

Opinion NO. o-3506 

Re: Use by State Parks Board 

or State Park .Fund to aubserlbe to magazines dealing 

with the admlnlstratlon of 

State parks. 

We have your letter or May 3, 19&l, requesting 

the opinion ot this department upon the question whether 

you are pansl~4~ed to use monay iromthe State Parks Fund 

ror subscrlpt&ons to %rlous reareatlonal magazines whlah 

"' deal with the WmI.nlstratlon of State parks. 

The appropriation provided by the Legislature 

for the ourre.@t blennlum (Senate Bill 427, Aota 16th Leg.,) 

oontalns the f+owing ltmmg 

*MaNtananao and Ml8oellaneousr 

"1. Stationery, prfntlng, equipment, supplies, telephones, postage, rent, and contingent 

..** . . . . . ~4,,000.00. 

a* t* 

*All of the previous annual balanoe ln,the 

special pju?k rund and ail ruture reoelpts deposited In the speolal park fund are hereby approprlateh and re-appEoprIated ror eaoh year of 

the biennium ror maintenance and Improvement of 

the State parks. Provided, however, the Sta,te 

Farks Board shflll not have the authority to employ any additional help out of said rebeipta 

except seasonal help. All maintenance items 

.: j 

,:-i' 

i 
Honorable Brank D. Quinn, Page 2 

may be supplemented with Federal funds." 

If t,he xriate$lal contained In the publltxitlone 

to which you refer is of such a nature that it will be 

helpful to you, in discharging your duty to provide for 

the maintenance and Improvement of the State parks under 

your jurisdiction, you are advised. that the subscriptions 

may be bought and paid for out of' either of the items of 

appropriation above quoted. The usa of the word "maintenanceW, in the rider appropriating the Slxcial Parks Fund, 

renders the appropriation broad enouch to cover those items 

of expendlture whphioh may be required in order to keep the 

Board advised conoerning the best means and methods for 

improving and~mafntainlng State parks, as developed from 

the experlenot of othera, for the duty and the authority 

to maintain a&d Improve neoeesarily involves the duty and 

authority to ~)ormul.ate plans end preeorlbe the methods by 

whloh auoh ma&ntenanoe and Improvement are to be done. See 

our opinions Ros. 0-2540, O-1885, O-2211, and o-1990, aople? 

OS each of whloh are enclosed herewith. 

Your0 very truly 

ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS 

By /s/ R. W. Fairohlld 

R, W. Falrohlld 

Arsisttmt 

/a/ Grover Se3,lers 

FlRST ASSISTm 

ATTORNEY GElfEkAL
#### Maria Pichardo, as Administratrix of the Estate of Adriano J. Martinez, Deceased, Respondent, v North Patchogue Medford Youth Athletic Assoc., Inc., et al., Appellants, et al., Defendants.

In an action to recover damages for wrongful death and conscious pain and suffering, the defendants North Patchogue Medford Youth Athletic Assoc., Inc., d/b/a Patchogue Medford Team and/or North Patchogue Ball Club, Eastern Suffolk Baseball Umpires Assoc., Inc., Stephen Tellekamp, Anthony Greco, Vincent Carrabis, Michael Abba*815tello and Charles Wynkoop separately appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Jones, J.), entered December 13, 1989, which denied their motions for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as it is asserted against them.

Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with one bill of costs payable to the appellants appearing separately and filing separate briefs, the motions are granted, the complaint is dismissed insofar as it is asserted against the appellants, and the action against the remaining defendants is severed.

Although we are aware of the general rule that negligence cases do not easily lend themselves to being decided on motions for summary judgment *(see, Andre v Pomeroy,*35 NY2d 361), we nevertheless conclude that, based upon the record before us, it cannot reasonably be inferred that the defendants breached any duty to the plaintiff.

The plaintiff’s decedent, who was nearly 19 years old at the time, was playing shortstop for a Connie Mack summer league baseball team when he was struck and killed by lightning on the evening of August 7, 1984. The plaintiff contends, *inter alia,*that the defendants were negligent in "allowing a baseball game to continue when threatening weather became apparent”. However, by electing to continue to play baseball in weather conditions which were readily apparent (at some point in the game, thunder was heard and some lightning was seen in the distance), the plaintiff’s decedent assumed the risks inherent in continued play *(see, Turcotte v Fell,*68 NY2d 432, 439; *Gallagher v Town of N. Hempstead,*144 AD2d 637).

Moreover, the plaintiff has failed to present any evidence that the decedent was ordered to continue to play or that there existed an economic compulsion or other circumstance which impelled the decedent to continue to play. Therefore, there has been no showing of an "inherent compulsion” which would negate a voluntary assumption of the risk *(see, Benitez v New York City Bd. of Educ.,*73 NY2d 650). Thompson, J. P., Brown, Kunzeman and Balletta, JJ., concur.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 97-2275
M. D. WILKINS, Plaintiff - Appellant, and M. D. WILKINS FUNERAL HOME, Plaintiff, versus JANET RENO, Attorney General of the UnitedStates; U. S. ATTORNEY FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA; EUGENE LUDWIG, Comptroller of the Currency; SIGNET BANKING CORPORATION; FEDERAL RESERVE BOARD OF GOVERNORS, Defendants - Appellees.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, District Judge. (CA-97-331) Submitted: November 20, 1997 Decided: December 9, 1997 Before MURNAGHAN, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.2 M. D. Wilkins, Appellant Pro Se. Richard Parker, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia; Ronald Edward Kuykendall, SIGNET BANK, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the district court's order denying relief on his complaint alleging civil rights violations. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Wilkins v. Reno , No. CA-97-331 (E.D. Va. Aug. 15, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Intelligence AgencyCOMMITTED TO EXCELLENCE IN DEFENSE OF THE NATION

Search
Search

Search
                    - Facilities Operating Status
                    - Employee Resources

-  Home		 
-  About    -  FAQs             
  -  Organization      -  Locations             
    -  Missile and Space Intelligence Center             
    -  Joint Military Attache School             
    -  Joint Military Intelligence Training Center 
  -  Open Source Intelligence             
  -  Equal Opportunity & Diversity             
  -  History      -  DIA Museum             
    -  George Washington Letters             
    -  Directors of DIA             
    -  The Historians 
  -  Sexual Assault Prevention and Response             
  -  Contact Us 
-  News & Features    -  Articles             
  -  Press Releases             
  -  Videos             
  -  DIA in the News             
  -  Threat Reports             
  -  Photo Gallery             
  -  No FEAR             
  -  Podcasts 
-  Careers & Opportunities    -  Career Fields      -  Analysis             
    -  Counterintelligence             
    -  Finance & Acquisition             
    -  Human Intelligence             
    -  Human Services             
    -  Information Technology             
    -  Inspector General             
    -  Legal             
    -  Mission Management             
    -  Office Management & Infrastructure             
    -  Science & Technology             
    -  Security 
  -  Search Vacancies             
  -  Apply to DIA             
  -  Hiring Process             
  -  Internships             
  -  Veteran Programs 
-  Business    -  Contractor Personnel Security             
  -  SIA3             
  -  SITE III             
  -  Innovation             
  -  NeedipeDIA             
  -  Office of Small Business Programs             
  -  Small Business FAQs 

HOMENEWS & FEATURES

Search

Search

                            - All Images 
                            - Other 

                            - Upload Date
                            - Photo Date
                            - Title

Share

----

Download Image: Small ()Medium ()Full Size (0.69 MB)

Tags:Marine Heavy Helicopter Squadron 461, Djibouti, Marine Corps, Pararescuemen, CH-53E Super Stallion helicopter

Photo by:VIRIN: 

Photo Gallery
_- 

356 

OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS 

AUSTIN 

Honarablo Qhr1.a H. Thoohld 

oouat7 At tora.7 

aalrertoa OouatJ 

(hlr48ton, Texas 

thir department oa 

fitat* of Teu88,' 

luder the Uni~erso, 

-iOIJ 8Xld it8 pO8- 

l o ur o p inio n ar to 

d,. in~1Ud.811 th. other 

t8d btat88, 8d fOl'@i@h 

8 %lthout the airit or 8ph.W 

8ma8tioa81 Diotionary. 
Eoaor8blo Chrlo8 8. Th8ob8ld, ?8ge 2 

VI find nothing In the proYI810n8 of Artlole 4477 

t0 bdiO8te th8t thm 9h'88* V88 th.N int8Xld.d t0 hV0 8 

dliiennt Be-. 

It '18'tb#nfOn OW OpiniOYI th8t, 8I used in raid 

Artlolo 1477, Itub 5b, the phra80 “born apt8Ide of th8 

St8k Of tOXa8,' Inoludm 811 the world be7ond th8 boundarIr8 Ot thI8 St8t@. 

CO9108 OS our Opinion8 808. 0-3858 and O-1)190, 

WJUO8t.d b7 7ou, 8Z'O enolorod hrrowlth.
FIFTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

Case No. 5D23-2231

LT Case No. 1201519225

 2006-DR-1218

_____________________________

MARK HENRY,

Appellant,

v.

DEPARTMENT of REVENUE o/b/o

DEBRA YOUNG-HENRY,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Seminole County.

Susan Stacy, Judge.

Thomas W. Sculco and Shannon McLin, of Florida Appeals, 

Orlando, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Toni C. Bernstein, Senior 

Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

March 1, 2024

ON CONCESSION OF ERROR

PER CURIAM.

Appellant appeals the trial court’s Supplemental Final 

Judgment on Report and Recommendations of the Hearing Officer. 
2

Appellee has filed a concession of error as to Appellant’s due 

process argument. We accept the concession of error, reverse the 

order, and remand for further proceedings. Based on the need for 

further proceedings, Appellant’s second issue on appeal is 

rendered moot.

REVERSED and REMANDED.

WALLIS, EISNAUGLE, and MACIVER, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLAImages

# DLA Images

Search

Search

                                  - All Images 
                                  - Other 

                                  - Upload Date
                                  - Photo Date
                                  - Title

Share

----

Download Image: Small ()Medium ()Full Size (0.63 MB)

Tags:DLA Distribution, Defense Logistics Agency Distribution, DLA Distribution Susquehanna, dla, Defense Logistics Agency

Photo by:VIRIN: 

Photo Gallery
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion

should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited

circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

August 8, 2007

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-50045

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

EFREN SERRANO-ROSALES, also known as Juan Zepeda

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. 3:06-CR-1492-1

Before DENNIS, CLEMENT, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Efren Serrano-Rosales raises

arguments that are foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S.

224, 235 (1998), which held that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) is a penalty provision and

not a separate criminal offense. The Government's motion for summary

affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.