alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
|   | (1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                             | Summit Hotel OP, LP                                                                                |
|----------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                             | By: Summit Hotel GP, LLC, its general partner                                                      |
|                             | By: Summit Hotel Properties, Inc., its sole member                                                 |
|                             |                                                                                               |
| Date:  August 15, 2011 | By:   /s/  Stuart J. Becker                                               |
|                             | Stuart J. BeckerExecutive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer) |
EXHIBIT 32



November 9, 2023



Via EDGAR



Securities and Exchange Commission

Judiciary Plaza

450 Fifth Street, N.W.

Washington, D.C. 20549



Re: Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



Ladies and Gentlemen:



In connection with the Quarterly Report of VOC
Energy Trust (the “Trust”) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2023 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, not in its individual capacity but solely as the
trustee of the Trust, certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that to its knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Trust.
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



The above certification is furnished solely pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350) and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure
document.



| | The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A.
| | -----------------------------------------------
| | Trustee for VOC Energy Trust                   
| |                                                
| | By:                                            
| |                                                
| |
#### The PEOPLE of the State of Colorado, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Larry G. RETALLACK, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 89CA1447.

Colorado Court of Appeals, Div. III.

Dec. 6, 1990.

John Suthers, Dist. Atty., Robert M. Brown, Chief Deputy Dist. Atty., Jeanne M. Smith, Asst. Dist. Atty., Colorado Springs, for plaintiff-appellant.

Thomas A. Barnes, Jr., Colorado Springs, for defendant-appellee.

Opinion by

Judge RULAND.

The People appeal the trial court’s order granting the Crim.P. 35(b) motion to reduce sentence of defendant, Larry Retallaek. We dismiss the appeal.

Defendant pled guilty to two counts of sexual exploitation of children. On December 12, 1988, he was sentenced to the Colorado Department of Corrections for two terms of eight years, to be served consecutively. Defendant and his attorney timely filed separate Crim.P. 35(b) motions for reduction of that sentence. A copy of each of these motions was mailed to the prosecution.

On June 14, 1989, the trial court reduced defendant’s sentence to five years on each count, to be served consecutively. On July 17, the prosecution filed a motion with the trial court to reconsider its order reducing the defendant’s sentence. The trial court conducted a hearing on this motion and denied it on August 7. On August 24, more than 45 days after the trial court granted defendant’s motion to reduce his sentence, the prosecution filed this appeal in which it asserts that the court erred by acting on defendant’s motion without conducting a hearing.

In its appellate brief the prosecution requests that: “[T]his court reverse the trial court, vacate the reduction of sentence and remand the case to the trial court for further proceedings and hearing on the motion for reduction of sentence.” In effect, the prosecution is seeking review of the trial court’s decision to resentence.

The procedure for appellate review of resentencing is set forth in C.A.R. 4(c). C.A.R. 4(c)(l)(II)(A) provides that:

> “If the appeal is to review a sentence following a plea of guilty or nolo conten-dere, or resentencing, where the imposition of sentence was the only issue before the court, then the following abbreviated procedure for appellate review of sentences will be utilized:”

> “(A) The notice of appeal must be filed within forty-five days from the date of the imposition of sentence.”

Further, the time for filing the notice of appeal may be extended only by the appellate court.

Here, the prosecution failed to file its notice of appeal within the 45 days as required by the applicable rule and failed to request an extension of time. Contrary to the prosecution’s contention, a motion filed after entry of the order challenged on appeal does not extend the time for the prose*280cution to file its notice pursuant to C.A.R. 4(b)(2). *See People v. Chesnick,*797 P.2d 812 (Colo.App.1990). Therefore, this court is without jurisdiction to consider the issues raised.

The appeal is dismissed.

METZGER and NEY, JJ., concur.
EXHIBIT 32.1

 

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)

 

In connection with this Report on Form 10-Q for the three and nine months ended June 30, 2022 (the “Report”) of PennantPark Floating Rate Capital, Ltd. (the “Registrant”), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Arthur H. Penn, Chief Executive Officer of the Registrant, hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge, that:

 

(1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

(2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.

 

|                    |        |                         |
|--------------------|--------|-------------------------|
| /s/ Arthur H. Penn |
| Name:              |   | Arthur H. Penn          |
| Title:             |   | Chief Executive Officer |
| Date:              |   | August 3, 2022          |

 

 

----
,l(EPJKABHA ABIAI(IHHA CJlY)KEA YKPAIHH ():(EMKABIACJIY)KEA YKPAIHH)

YKpatHa, 01135, M. KHiB, np. TlepeMom, 14 Ten:+38(044) 461-54-0 I <t>rucc:+38(044) 486-92

- 92 Be6: www.avia.gov.ua E-mail: vdz@avia.gov.ua 

### l. 16 - . .. 

## p-1 5" 1; b**. ~**  2. 

### 'Lo-13 Mr. Paul L.Gretch Director Office of International Aviation U S Department of Transportation 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE Washington DC 20591 Dear 

### Mr. Gretch, 

### STATE AVIATION ADMINISTRATION OF UKRAINE

14. Peremogy ave., 01135. Kyiv. Ukraine Tel.:

- r38(044) 461-54-01 Fax: +38(044) 486-92-92 Web: W\V\V.avia.gov.ua E-mail: vdz ® avia.gov.ua

The State Aviation Administration of Ukraine presents its compliments to you and taking into account the U.S. Department of Transportation ' s rule requiring a statement of reciprocity every six months with re spect to charter applications filed by Ukrainian airli nes to the U.S. Depattment of Transportation would like to confirm that it wi ll accord the same privileges to U . S. airlines to operate cargo charter fljghts w ith Fifth, Sixth and Seventh Freedom to the extent that the U.S
. D epartment of Transportation grants reciprocal privileges to Ukrainian airlines according to the submjtted applications. Yours sincerely ,
Oleksandr Grechko Senior Deputy Chairman



# 005950
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR
. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR
. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED August 8, 2007 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk 

### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-50045 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff-Appellee

v. EFREN SERRANO-ROSALES, also known as Juan Zepeda Defendant-Appellant
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 3:06-CR-1492-1
Before DENNIS, CLEMENT, and PRADO, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Efren Serrano-Rosales raises arguments that are foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998), which held that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) is a penalty provision and not a separate criminal offense. The Government's motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and thejudgment ofthe district court isAFFIRMED.
EXHIBIT 31.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

I, Nicholas Radesca, Chief Financial Officer of
Solar Senior Capital Ltd., certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Solar Senior Capital Ltd.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material
fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all
material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for
the registrant and have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which
this report is being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the
registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over
financial reporting; and

5. The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.

Dated this day of August 2, 2011



|                       
|-----------------------
|/S/    NICHOLAS
RADESCA
|Nicholas Radesca
**EXHIBIT 32**

 

August 9, 2016

 

Via EDGAR

 

Securities and Exchange Commission

Judiciary Plaza

450 Fifth Street, N.W.

Washington, D.C. 20549

 

Re:                             Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

 

Ladies and Gentlemen:

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of VOC Energy Trust (the “Trust”) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2016 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, not in its individual capacity but solely as the trustee of the Trust, certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to its knowledge:

 

(1)                                 The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

(2)                                 The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Trust.

 

The above certification is furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350) and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.

 
|     | The Bank   of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A. |
|----------|---------------------------------------------------|
|     | Trustee   for VOC Energy Trust                    |
|     |                                              |   |
|     | By:                                               | /s/   MICHAEL J. ULRICH |
|     |                                              | Michael   J. Ulrich |
| * * | * *                                          | *Vice President and Trust Officer* |

 

1

----
#### Kenneth Wilpon, Respondent, v RJW Brokerage Corp. et al., Appellants.

In an action to recover damages for breach of contract, the defendants appeal from an order of the *606Supreme Court, Richmond County (Cusick, J.), dated June 19, 1989, which denied their motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs, for reasons stated by Justice Cusick at the Supreme Court. Bracken, J. P., Kunzeman, Sullivan and Rosenblatt, JJ., concur.
TSO10K2013-EX.04.7


Exhibit 4.7


U.S. Bank National Association
535 Griswold, Suite 550 
Detroit, Michigan 48226
Attention: Corporate Trust Administration


September 10, 2013
Tesoro Corporation 
19100 Ridgewood Parkway 
San Antonio, Texas 78259 
Attention: Corporate Secretary 

Re:    Release of Guarantors 
    
Reference is made to (i) the Indenture, dated as of June 5, 2009 (as supplemented and amended from time to time, the “2009 Indenture”), among Tesoro Corporation (the “Company”), the guarantors named therein and the U.S. Bank National Association, as trustee (the “Trustee”), relating to the Company’s 9.75% Senior Notes due 2019; (ii) the Indenture, dated as of September 27, 2012 (as supplemented and amended from time to time, the “2012 Indenture” and, together with the 2009 Indenture, the “Indentures” and each individually, an “Indenture”), among the Company, the guarantors named therein and the Trustee, as trustee, relating to the Company’s 4.250% Senior Notes due 2017 and the Company’s 5.375% Senior Notes due 2022; and (iii) the Officers’ Certificate of the Company dated September 10, 2013 relating to the sale of all of the Capital Stock of Tesoro Hawaii, LLC (“Tesoro Hawaii”), a Restricted Subsidiary of the Company and a Guarantor, and the release of Tesoro Hawaii and its wholly owned subsidiary, Smiley’s Super Service Inc. (“Smiley’s”),  as Guarantors under each Indenture (the “Sale and Release”)  (capitalized terms used herein without definition have the meanings assigned to them in the applicable Indenture).
The Trustee hereby acknowledges (i) the receipt of the foregoing Officer’s Certificate delivered by the Company pursuant to Section 10.04 of each of the Indentures in connection with the Sale and Release and (ii) that Tesoro Hawaii and Smiley’s have been released from their obligations under the Guarantees under each Indenture. This instrument shall serve to evidence such release.



        








	
					
	U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Trustee

	 

	By:
	 
	   /s/ JAMES KOWALSKI

	 
	 
	Name:
	 
	James Kowalski

	 
	 
	Title:
	 
	Vice President







[Tesoro Hawaii Guarantor Release – Trustee Acknowledgment]
### Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h
Elizabeth A. Weave r

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathaway,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk May 27, 2009

0518 

# Order

May 27, 2009

138377

DEBORAH A. PERCIVAL, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 138377 COA: 287745 WCAC: 07-000046 OAKLAND COUNTY, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application fo r leave to appeal th e February 18, 2009 order of the Court of Appeals is consider ed, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented s hould be reviewed by this Court.
Exhibit




FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE
GRAPHIC PACKAGING RETIREMENT PLAN
(As Amended and Restated Effective January 1, 2015)


WHEREAS, the Compensation and Benefits Committee of the Board of Directors of Graphic Packaging Holding Company has delegated to the Retirement Committee (the “Retirement Committee”) of Graphic Packaging International, Inc. (the “Company”) the responsibility to make certain amendments to the Graphic Packaging Retirement Plan (the “Plan”); and


WHEREAS, the Retirement Committee deems it desirable to amend the Plan, in accordance with recent collective bargaining agreements, to exclude from participation in the Plan new hires, rehires, and transfers at the Company’s Menasha, Wisconsin Carton Plant and Wausau, Wisconsin Carton Plant represented by Local 2-0148 and Local 2-0224 of the United Steel, Paper and Forestry, Rubber, Manufacturing, Energy, Allied-Industrial and Service Workers International Union;


NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, effective as of the date that this amendment is executed, that the Plan be, and it hereby is, amended in the following respects:


1.    Section 3.1 of Appendix 3 is amended by adding a new sentence at the end thereof to read as follows:


“Notwithstanding any other provision of the Plan, an Employee who is hired or who would otherwise become an Eligible Employee as a result of a transfer as described in Section 4.1 on or after January ___, 2015 shall not become a Member under this Appendix 3 after January ___, 2015.”


2.    Section 3.2 of Appendix 3 is amended by adding a new sentence at the end thereof to read as follows:


“Notwithstanding any other provision of the Plan, an Employee who is reemployed on or after January ___, 2015 shall not accrue any additional benefit under the terms of this Appendix 3 on and after his date of reemployment.”
















[signatures on the following page]





1




BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Retirement Committee has approved this First Amendment to the Graphic Packaging Retirement Plan this 6th day of January, 2015.


GRAPHIC PACKAGING INTERNATIONAL, INC. RETIREMENT COMMITTEE MEMBERS


    
By:  /s/ Brad Ankerholz                
Brad Ankerholz


By:  /s/ Carla J. Chaney                
Carla J. Chaney


By:  /s/ Debbie Frank                    
Debbie Frank


By:  /s/ Stephen Scherger                
Stephen Scherger


By:  /s/ Brian A. Wilson                
Brian A. Wilson










W: \4577.007\Docs\1st Amend Graphic Packaging Retirement Plan (1-1-2015 restatement).docx

2
#### The People of the State of New York ex rel. Richard Scholl, Appellant, v Commissioner of New York City Department of Correction, Respondent. The People of the State of New York ex rel. Roy Hatch, Appellant, v Commissioner of New York City Department of Correction, Respondent.

Two orders, Supreme Court, New York County (George Roberts, J.), each entered October 17, 1990, which denied and dismissed petitioners’ respective writs for habeas corpus, unanimously reversed, on the law, and on the facts, and in the exercise of discretion, without costs or disbursements, and petitioners’ bail reduced from $1,000,000 to $500,000, insurance company bail bond or cash, for each petitioner.

Based on our review of the record, we find the bail as originally set to be excessive to the extent indicated. If, indeed, the use of petitioner Scholl’s Pennsylvania estate as collateral for the previously obtained surety bond violates the federal court order restricting the transfer of such property, as claimed, respondent’s remedy lies in an examination as to the sufficiency of the surety. *(See,*CPL 520.30.) Concur—Murphy, P. J., Sullivan, Carro, Wallach and Kupferman, JJ.
EXHIBIT 32





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350





In connection with the quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Superior Growth Corporation (the “Company”) for the quarter ended March 31, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Joseph Rozelle, President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge that:





1.
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








Date: My 13, 2011





/s/ Joseph RozelleJoseph Rozelle

President

(Principal Executive and Financial Officer)











The foregoing certification is being furnished as an exhibit to the Report pursuant to Item 601(b)(32) of Regulation S-K and  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code) and, accordingly, is not being filed as part of the Report for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not incorporated by reference into any filings of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.