alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 602 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 602

To amend the Public Health Service Act to provide for the participation 
   of physical therapists in the National Health Service Corps Loan 
               Repayment Program, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 19, 2013

Mr. Tester (for himself and Mr. Wicker) introduced the following bill; 
     which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, 
                     Education, Labor, and Pensions

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Public Health Service Act to provide for the participation 
   of physical therapists in the National Health Service Corps Loan 
               Repayment Program, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Physical Therapist Workforce and 
Patient Access Act of 2013''.

SEC. 2. NATIONAL HEALTH SERVICE CORPS; PARTICIPATION OF PHYSICAL 
              THERAPISTS IN LOAN REPAYMENT PROGRAM.

    (a) Mission of Corps; Definition of Primary Health Services.--
Section 331(a)(3)(D) of the Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 
254d(a)(3)(D)) is amended by striking ``or mental health,'' and 
inserting ``mental health, or physical therapy,''.
    (b) Loan Repayment Program.--Section 338B of the Public Health 
Service Act (42 U.S.C. 254l-1) is amended--
            (1) in subsection (a)(1), by striking ``and physician 
        assistants;'' and inserting ``physician assistants, and 
        physical therapists;''; and
            (2) in subsection (b)(1)--
                    (A) in subparagraph (A), by inserting before the 
                semicolon at the end the following: ``, or have a 
                doctoral or master's degree in physical therapy'';
                    (B) in subparagraph (B), by inserting ``physical 
                therapy,'' after ``mental health,''; and
                    (C) in subparagraph (C)(ii), by inserting 
                ``physical therapy,'' after ``dentistry,''.
                                 <all>
```
EX-10.44



 Exhibit 10.44 
 SUMMARY OF COMPENSATION ARRANGEMENTS 
 WITH NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTORS

 (Effective as of December 31, 2013) 
 The following summarizes the compensation and benefits received by the non-employee Directors of CryoLife as of December 31, 2013. It is intended to be a summary of compensation arrangements, and in no
way is intended to provide any additional rights to any non-employee Director. 
 Annual Retainer and Committee Chair Fees 

Each of the non-employee Directors of the Board of Directors of CryoLife receives an annual cash retainer of $40,000. Each committee chair
also receives a fee in addition to the annual cash retainer in the amounts shown in the following table. 
  

					
	 Annual Fees For Committee Chairs
	  	 	 
	 Audit Committee
	  	$	15,000	  
	 Compensation Committee
	  	$	10,000	  
	 Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee
	  	$	7,500	  
	 Regulatory Affairs and Quality Assurance Policy Committee
	  	$	7,500	  

 The Presiding Director also receives an additional $25,000 retainer paid in cash. CryoLife pays all cash
retainers on a monthly basis. Currently, the Presiding Director is also the Chairman of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and he does not receive any additional compensation for his position as Chairman of that committee. 

Effective June 1, 2013, each committee member other than the Presiding Director also receives a fee, in addition to the annual cash
retainer, in the amounts shown in the following table. 
  

					
	 Annual Fees For Committee Members
	  	 	 
	 Audit Committee
	  	$	7,500	  
	 Compensation Committee
	  	$	5,000	  
	 Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee
	  	$	3,750	  
	 Regulatory Affairs and Quality Assurance Policy Committee
	  	$	3,750	  

 Restricted Stock Grants 
 Non-employee Directors of CryoLife are eligible for equity grants, which are generally made in May of each year. The annual equity portion of nonemployee Director compensation for fiscal 2013 was paid in
the form of a grant of 10,000 shares of restricted stock. These shares were issued following the annual meeting of stockholders and vest on the first anniversary of issuance. The size and terms of the annual equity grant are subject to annual
reevaluation by the Compensation Committee. If a Director ceases to serve as a Director for any reason, he will forfeit any unvested portion of the award.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v John Dunnell, Appellant.

Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Richard Price, J.), rendered on September 23, 1988, convicting defendant, upon a plea of guilty of attempted murder in the second degree and robbery in the first degree and sentencing defendant to concurrent indeterminate terms of imprisonment of 5 to 15 years on each count, unanimously affirmed.

We are unpersuaded that the sentence imposed was unduly harsh or severe. Taking into account, "among other things, the crime charged, the particular circumstances of the individual before the court and the purpose of a penal sanction”, we perceive no abuse of discretion warranting a reduction in sentence. *(People v Farrar,*52 NY2d 302, 305.)

Further, defendant was sentenced in accordance with his plea bargain and within statutory guidelines. "Having received the benefit of his bargain, defendant should be bound by its terms.” *(People v Felman,*141 AD2d 889, 890, *lv denied*
      *40872 NY2d 918.) Concur—Rosenberger, J. P., Kupferman, Kassal and Rubin, JJ.
Exhibit 32.1

Securities and Exchange Commission

100 F Street, N.E.

Washington, D.C. 20549



|RE: | Certification pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350)
|--- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Ladies and Gentlemen:

In connection with the Quarterly Report of SandRidge Mississippian Trust I (the Trust) on Form 10-Q for the
quarterly period ended September 30, 2012 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, not in its individual capacity but solely as the Trustee of the Trust, certifies
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, that to its knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Trust.
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The above certification is furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350) and is not being filed as part of the Form 10-Q or as a separate disclosure document.



/s/ Michael J. UlrichMichael J. UlrichVice PresidentThe Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A., as Trustee of SandRidge Mississippian Trust I


November 13, 2012
wern-20131231ex102




EXHIBIT 10.2


WERNER ENTERPRISES, INC.
NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTOR COMPENSATION




Non-employee members of the Board of Directors (the “Board”) of Werner Enterprises, Inc. (the “Company”) receive annual cash retainers and cash meeting fees summarized in the table below.  Such fees were approved on August 14, 2007 by the Compensation Committee (the “Committee”) of the Board.
	
			
	 
Fee or Retainer
	 
	

Amount

	Annual Retainer for Board Membership
	 
	$15,000
(paid in quarterly installments of $3,750 each)

	 
	 
	 

	Annual Retainer for the Audit Committee Chair
	 
	$10,000
(paid in quarterly installments of $2,500 each)

	 
	 
	 

	Annual Retainer for the Compensation Committee Chair
	 
	$5,000
(paid in quarterly installments of $1,250 each)

	 
	 
	 

	Board of Directors Meeting Fee
	 
	$2,000
(paid for each Board meeting)

	 
	 
	 

	Board Committee Meeting Fee
	 
	$2,000
(paid for each committee meeting not held on the same day as a Board meeting)






Non-employee directors are also eligible to receive equity awards, at the sole discretion of the Committee.  Equity awards are granted pursuant to the terms of the Werner Enterprises, Inc. Amended and Restated Equity Plan and either the Form of Notice of Grant of Nonqualified Stock Option or the Form of Restricted Stock Award Agreement, all of which are filed as exhibits to the Company’s Form 10-K.  To the extent required by SEC regulations, equity awards granted to the Company’s non-employee directors are reported on Form 4 filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission.


We also reimburse each non-employee director at cost for all of their reasonable out-of-pocket travel expenses incurred in connection with their attendance at Board and Board committee meetings and for other reasonable out-of-pocket expenses directly related to their Board and Board committee service.
#### Diane W. Gaca, Appellant, v Michele E. Nash, Respondent.

Order unanimously affirmed without costs for the reasons stated in decision at Onondaga County Family Court, Bersani, J. (Appeal from Order of Onondaga County Family Court, Bersani, J.—Custody.) Present—Callahan, J. P., Doerr, Denman, Pine and Lawton, JJ.
Report of the

U.S. International Development Finance Corporation On

Workforce Demographic Data

As of March 2023

Submitted Pursuant to House Report 117-401
Veterans

End FY21 End FY22 Current

Non Veteran 88.9% 88.8% 87.7%

Veteran 11.1% 11.2% 12.3%

0.0%

20.0%

40.0%

60.0%

80.0%

100.0%

120.0%

Veteran Status over Time

Veteran Non Veteran

62

12%

443

88%

Current Veteran Status

Veteran Non Veteran
Disability

80.4%

7.9%

11.7%

Current Disability Status

None Not Identified Disabilities

82.0%

8.2% 9.9%

81.4%

8.7% 10.0%

80.4%

7.9%

11.7%

0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%

70.0%

80.0%

90.0%

None Not Identified Disabilities

Disability Status over Time

End FY21 End FY22 Current
Race and National Origin

1.0%

0.6%

56.4%

0.4%

18.8%

13.5%

0.4%

8.9%

None Specified

Two or More

White

Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander

Black/African American

Asian

American Indian/Alaskan Native

Hispanic/Latino

DFC Current Demographics %

1.0%

0.6%

56.4%

0.4%

18.8%

13.5%

0.4%

8.9%

2.1%

67.5%

0.2%

12.3%

4.4%

0.6%

13.0%

None Specified

Two or More

White

Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander

Black/African American

Asian

American Indian/Alaskan Native

Hispanic/Latino

DFC vs. Civilian Labor Force (CLF)

CLF DFC Current
Race and National Origin: 2021- Current
Gender

45.10%

54.90%

51.80%

48.20%

0.00%

10.00%

20.00%

30.00%

40.00%

50.00%

60.00%

Male Female

DFC (Current) vs Civilian Labor Force

DFC CLF

45.2% 45.6% 45.1%

54.8% 54.4% 54.9%

0.0%

20.0%

40.0%

60.0%

80.0%

100.0%

120.0%

End FY21 End FY22 Current

Gender Distribution over Time

Male Female
----

EDICOM Grants Programme

Projects that may benefit from a Eurostat grant during the year 2005 under the EDICOM programme

Public information

(2005/C 77/09)

The actions listed in the Edicom 2005 grants programme are open for proposals. However, since these actions are directly linked to activities relating to the collection, production and dissemination of official statistics to be transmitted to the Commission (Eurostat), applicants must have the appropriate powers and responsibilities to meet the objectives in question.

The electronic file, which gives the title and aims of the project, the legislative basis, the total amount, the results expected, the timetable and the operational unit can be found on the EUROPA server(http://europa.eu.int).

From the Europa initial page you may reach the Grants Programme through the following path: ‘Institutions’, ‘Commission’, ‘Statistics’, ‘Eurostat activities’, ‘Other activities’, ‘Calls for tenders and grants’ and then ‘EDICOM Grant Programme for 2005’.

Please read the information accompanying this file carefully, and you are kindly requested to inform us of your interest in participating in this programme by writing to:

You will receive acknowledgement that your expression of interest has been received.

Deadline for sending proposals of interest to participate: 30 April 2005 (date as post-marked). Failure to respect this deadline will automatically result in refusal of your application.

----
Consent of Independent Auditors


We  consent  to the  incorporation  by  reference  in  the  Amendment  No.  2 to
Registration  Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-45847) of Ionic Fuel Technology,  Inc.
and in the related  Prospectus of our report dated August 28, 1998, with respect
to the consolidated  financial statements and schedule of Ionic Fuel Technology,
Inc.  included  in this  Annual  Report  (Form 10-K) for the year ended June 30,
1998.



                                         /s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP


Stamford, Connecticut
September 28, 1998
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

 v.

JUAN LEON-CORDOVA,

Defendant-Appellant.

No. 15-50527

D.C. No. 3:15-cr-01494-LAB

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of California

Larry A. Burns, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted February 14, 2017**

Before: GOODWIN, FARRIS, and FERNANDEZ, Circuit Judges.

Juan Leon-Cordova appeals from the district court’s judgment and 

challenges the 60-month sentence following his jury-trial conviction for being a 

removed alien found in the United States, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. We 

have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

FILED

FEB 22 2017

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 15-50527 

Leon-Cordova contends that the district court erred by enhancing his 

sentence under section § 1326(b). Specifically, he argues that Almendarez-Torres 

v. United States, 523 U.S. 224 (1998), which permits an enhancement based on the 

existence of a prior felony, is invalid under Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 

490 (2000). As Leon-Cordova acknowledges, this argument is foreclosed. See 

United States v. Pacheco-Zepeda, 234 F.3d 411, 414 (9th Cir. 2000) (Apprendi

“unmistakably carved out an exception for ‘prior convictions’ that specifically 

preserved the holding of Almendarez-Torres”); see also Alleyne v. United States, 

133 S. Ct. 2151, 2160 n.1 (2013) (declining to revisit Almendarez-Torres).

AFFIRMED.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Samuel Rose, Appellant.

Appeal from judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (William T. Martin, J., at *Sandoval*Hearing, jury trial, and sentence), entered April 18, 1988, convicting defendant of the crime of rape in the first degree (Penal Law § 130.35 [1]), and sentencing him, as a second violent felony offender, to an indeterminate term of imprisonment of from eight to sixteen years, is unanimously held in abeyance, and the matter remanded to Criminal Term for an evidentiary hearing, as to whether defendant was present at the *Sandoval*Hearing.

On appeal, defendant contends that his conviction should be reversed, since his due process right, to be personally present at all material stages of the trial *(see, People v Mehmedi,*69 NY2d 759, 760 [1987]; CPL 260.20), was violated by his absence, without waiver, from the *Sandoval*Hearing *(People v Sandoval,*34 NY2d 371 [1974]). In view of the fact that our examination of the transcript of the *Sandoval*Hearing does not clearly indicate whether the defendant was present, we hold the appeal in abeyance, and remand the matter to Criminal Term for a hearing on that issue. Concur—Sullivan, J. P., Rosenberger, Ross, Asch and Smith, JJ.
Exhibit 32.2





Certification of Principal Financial Officer


Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to


Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of PinstripesNYC, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Clifford Teller, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:





(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/ Clifford Teller_______

Clifford Teller

Principal Financial Officer

November 24, 2010
----

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.3639 — Bridgepoint/SEA)

(2005/C 11/07)

(Text with EEA relevance)

On 20 December 2004, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in Italian and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

----
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 170 (Friday, August 31, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Pages 44564-44565]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-19085]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

BROADCASTING BOARD OF GOVERNORS


Sunshine Act Meetings

TIME AND DATE: Wednesday, September 5, 2018, 10:30 a.m. ET.

PLACE: Cohen Building, Room 3321, 330 Independence Ave. SW, Washington, 
DC 20237.

[[Page 44565]]


STATUS: This meeting will be open to the public.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: The Broadcasting Board of Governors (Board) 
will be meeting at the time and location listed above. The Board will 
vote on a consent agenda consisting of the minutes of its June 6, 2018 
meeting and a resolution honoring the 55th anniversary of Voice of 
America's English to Africa Service. The Board will receive a report 
from the Chief Executive Officer and Director of BBG.
    This meeting will be available for public observation via streamed 
webcast, both live and on-demand, on the agency's public website at 
www.bbg.gov. Information regarding this meeting, including any updates 
or adjustments to its starting time, can also be found on the agency's 
public website.
    The public may also attend this meeting in person at the address 
listed above as seating capacity permits. Members of the public seeking 
to attend the meeting in person must register at https://bbgboardmeetingsept2018.eventbrite.com by 12:00 p.m. (ET) on September 
4. For more information, please contact BBG Public Affairs at (202) 
203-4400 or by email at <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#04747166656262446666632a636b72"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="3b4b4e595a5d5d7b59595c155c544d">[email protected]</span></a>.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Persons interested in obtaining 
more information should contact Oanh Tran at (202) 203-4545.

Oanh Tran,
Managing Director.
[FR Doc. 2018-19085 Filed 8-29-18; 11:15 am]
 BILLING CODE 8610-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
|Section 5: EX-32.2
|------------------



Exhibit 32.2



Certification of Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)



In connection with the
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2012 (the “Report”) of GSV Capital Corp. (the “Registrant”),
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Stephen D. Bard, the Chief Financial Officer of the
Registrant, hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge, that:



(1) The Report fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and



(2) The information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.



|      |  | /s/ Stephen D. Bard
|----- |  | -------------------
|Name: |  | Stephen D. Bard    
|Date: |  | May 7, 2012
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

____________________________________________________

US AIRLINE PILOTS ASSOCIATION,

Plaintiff,

v. 1:09-CV-1675

 (FJS/JMF)

PENSION BENEFIT GUARANTY CORPORATION,

Defendant.

____________________________________________________

APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL

BINGHAM MCCUTCHEN LLP David J. Butler, Esq.

2020 K Street, NW Thomas R. Lotterman, Esq.

Washington, D.C. 20006 William S. D. Cravens, Esq.

Attorneys for Plaintiff

PENSION BENEFIT GUARANTY Joseph M. Kretteck, Esq.

CORPORATION Garth D. Wilson, Esq.

1200 K Street, NW Paula J. Connelly, Esq.

Suite 340

Washington, D.C. 20005

Attorneys for Defendant

SCULLIN, Senior Judge

ORDER

Currently before the Court are Plaintiff's motion for summary judgment, see Dkt. No. 57,

and Defendant's cross-motion for judgment on the pleadings or, in the alternative, for summary

judgment, see Dkt. No. 58. The Court heard oral argument in support of, and in opposition to,

these motions on March 13, 2012. 

After hearing the parties' oral arguments, the Court advised counsel that there were issues

of fact regarding whether Defendant had breached its fiduciary duties, which precluded granting
the parties the relief they sought. In addition, the Court questioned Defendant's counsel about the

current status of the new plan asset evaluation that Defendant had undertaken for all four

terminated US Airways pension plans, including the plan at issue in this case.

1

Accordingly, after considering the parties' submissions and oral arguments and the

relevant law, and for the reasons the Court stated at oral argument, the Court hereby

ORDERS that Plaintiff's motion for summary judgment is DENIED; and the Court

further

ORDERS that Defendant's cross-motion for judgment on the pleadings or, in the

alternative, for summary judgment is DENIED; and the Court further

ORDERS that Defendant shall file with the Court and serve on opposing counsel a report

addressing the current status of the new plan asset evaluation on or before April 13, 2012; and

the Court further

ORDERS that counsel shall appear for a status conference with the Court on April 18,

2012, at 10:00 a.m.; and the Court further

 On February 3, 2012, Defendant's counsel notified Magistrate Judge Facciola and 1

Plaintiff's counsel that Defendant estimated that this new plan asset evaluation would be

completed by September 30, 2012. See Dkt. No. 76.

-2-
ORDERS that Plaintiff's unopposed motion for an expedited hearing and consideration

of the parties' cross-motions for summary judgment is DENIED as moot.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: March 19, 2012

Syracuse, New York

-3-