alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### In the Matter of the P. Children. Commissioner of Social Services of the City of New York, Respondent; Sherry P., Appellant.

In a child protective proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 10, the mother appeals from a dispositional order of the Family Court, Kings County (Palmer, J.), dated April 9, 1990, which, upon a fact-finding order of the same court, dated February 9, 1990, determining that her three children were abused, after a hearing, placed the children with the Commissioner of Social Services of the City of New York for one year.

*840Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

It is undisputed that the petitioner made out a prima facie case of abuse by establishing that the appellant mother’s two-year-old daughter, Janiqua had contracted gonorrhea. Once a prima facie case was established by the petitioner, the burden of going forward shifted to the parent or person responsible for Janiqua to offer a satisfactory explanation for the occurrence of the injuries *(see, Matter of Jesse S.,*152 AD2d 581; *Matter of Marcus S.,*123 AD2d 702; *see also, Matter of Jacinta J.,*140 AD2d 990). In this case, the mother did not offer a satisfactory explanation to rebut the petitioner’s evidence, which included, *inter alia,*the injury to Janiqua and the mother’s own positive test results for gonorrhea. Consequently, we find that the Family Court could properly find that the mother’s conduct either caused or contributed to the abuse of Janiqua and endangered the other children *(see,*Family Ct Act § 1012 [g]; *Matter of Jacinta J., supra).*Thompson, J. P., Brown, Kunzeman and Balletta, JJ., concur.
Exhibit






 Exhibit 10.1
2016 Cash Incentive Compensation Plan


Eligible Employees:  All non-Section 16 officers (“Vice Presidents”) and senior executives (Section 16) officers (“Executive Officers”) of the Company are eligible for participation in the Company’s 2016 Cash Incentive Compensation Plan.  


Applicable Period:  The 2016 Cash Incentive Plan applies to performance during the Company’s fiscal year ending December 31, 2016.  


 Components of the Plan and Criteria to Fund:  The 2016 Cash Incentive Compensation Plan consists of the following four components (1) revenue performance on core products, (2) revenue performance on new products, (3) earnings- per-share, and (4) defined impact goals.  Each component of the 2016 Cash Incentive Compensation Plan includes targets at minimum, plan, and maximum payout. The minimum targets serve as the threshold upon which the incentive pool will begin to fund for that component.  Achievement of the components at plan/target will earn the target cash incentive opportunity.  Payout will be calculated along a linear continuum from minimum to plan/target and from plan/target to maximum with the maximum target serving as the point at which the management team will earn the highest possible cash incentive opportunity.


The minimum performance target must be met in order for a portion of the bonus to be paid relative to any one of the four components.  Each component will be measured separately.  Bonus payout to Executive Officers will be based seventy (70%) percent on achievement of revenue and earnings-per-share goals and thirty (30%) percent on corporate impact goals.  Bonus payout to Vice Presidents will be based seventy (70%) percent on achievement of revenue and earnings-per-share goals and thirty (30%) percent on individual impact goals.


The following table below represents the target bonus and maximum bonus for each of the Company’s Vice Presidents and above and as a percent of such employee’s annual base salary.  


	
				
	Executive Officer


	Target
	Maximum

	President and CEO
	125%
	150%

	Executive Officers (other than President and CEO)
	75%
	90%

	Vice Presidents
	50%
	60%
#### Grace M. Van Loon, Respondent, v Steven Moskowitz et al., Appellants.

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendants appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Richmond County (Sangiorgio, J.), dated October 6, 1989, which denied their application to unseal the records of a certain criminal action.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The plaintiff commenced this action against the defendants, alleging that she injured her ankle when she tripped over a defect in the defendants’ driveway. The defendants moved to unseal certain criminal records in order to advance their contention that the plaintiff incurred this injury when she was assaulted by her boyfriend. The plaintiff does not dispute that she was the victim of an assault on the same day which resulted in a criminal complaint and that the records of the criminal action were subsequently sealed pursuant to CPL 160.50. The defendants concede that they are not entitled to access to the records under CPL 160.50 (1) (d) but request that the court exercise its inherent power to unseal the records in the interest of justice *(see, Matter of Hynes v Karassik,*47 NY2d 659).

We find that the court properly denied the defendants’ application. The court’s inherent power to unseal records should be exercised rarely and only in extraordinary circumstances *(see, Matter of Hynes v Karassik, supra).*Such circumstances are not present in this case. We note that there is no indication in the record before us that the defendant in the criminal action was provided an opportunity to be heard in opposition to the motion to unseal the records in that criminal action. The information is sought primarily for impeachment purposes, and there are other sources of this information available to the defendants. Finally, since the defendant in the criminal action is not a party to this civil action, the defendants may not rely on the theory of an implied waiver of the protection of CPL 160.50 *(see, e.g., Taylor v New York City Tr. Auth.,*131 AD2d 460; *Gebbie v Gertz Div.,*94 AD2d 165). Kunzeman, J. P., Kooper, Lawrence and O’Brien, JJ., concur.
## u.s. DEPARTMENT oF TRANSPORTATioR

# ECEIVED FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION OFFICE OF HEARINGS

WASHINGTON, D.C. In the Matter ofLincoln Park Aviation 2011EA250037 Judge Not Assigned 

## i-11.A <90 15 ·O"J l'i NOTICE OF APPEARANCE 

### DEC 11 2013 

### HEARING DOCKET

Complainant, Federal Aviation Administration, hereby notifies the United States Department of Transportation, Office ofHearings, and the Respondent, pursuant to 14 C.F.R. §13 .204(b), that it shall be represented in the above-stated action by the attorney listed below. All communications, notices, pleadings, or documents are respectfully requested to be forwarded as follows:: Zachary M. Berman Federal Aviation Administration Office ofRegional Counsel 1Aviation Plaza Jamaica, NY 11434 Telephone: 718 553-3258 Facsimile: 718 995-5699 Respectfully submitted, Alfred R. Johnson, Jr. Regional Counsel



### Hy

# z,ohmy1l~ Attorney

# Dated:_\~0+-----{ 11--L'II

# ~----CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certifY that on this day copies ofthe foregoing Notice ofAppearance were placed in the United States mail, postage prepaid, Certified Mail

- Retnm Receipt Requested addressed as follows: Frank R. Galella Lincoln Park Aviation 425 Beaverbrook Road Lincoln Park, NJ 07035 Federal Aviation Administration (Original and one copy) 800 Independence Avenue, S.W. Washington, D.C. 20591 Attn: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 Wilbur Wright Building- Room 2014**~IF** FILING BY FEDERAL EXPRESS Federal Aviation Administration (Original and one copy) 600 Independence Avenue, SW Wilbur Wright Building- Room 2014 Washington, DC 20591 Attn: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430

Date: 

### DEC

- 3 

### 201:1 Paralegal Specialist Office ofRegional Counsel 1Aviation Plaza Jamaica, NY 11434
Exhibit
23.01




CONSENT
OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM




We
consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No.
333-01560, 333-60295, 333-110959, and 333-130405 on Form S-8 of our reports
dated February 28, 2008, relating to the financial statements and financial
statement schedules of Central European Media Enterprises Ltd. (which report
expresses an unqualified opinion) and management’s report on the effectiveness
of internal control over financial reporting, appearing in this Annual Report on
Form 10-K of Central European Media Enterprises Ltd. for the year ended December
31, 2007.




DELOITTE
& TOUCHE LLP




London,
United Kingdom




February
28, 2008
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLAImages

# DLA Images

Search

Search

                                  - All Images 
                                  - Other 

                                  - Upload Date
                                  - Photo Date
                                  - Title

Share

----

Download Image: Small ()Medium ()Full Size (0.18 MB)

Tags:DLA Hall of Fame, dla, hall of fame, People and Culture, Defense Logistics Agency

Photo by:VIRIN: 

Photo Gallery
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 174 (Friday, September 7, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Page 45455]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-19454]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES


Charter Renewal for the Advisory Committee on Organ 
Transplantation

AGENCY: Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA), The 
Department of Health and Human Services (HHS).

ACTION: Notice of charter renewal.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: HHS is hereby giving notice that the Advisory Committee on 
Organ Transplantation (ACOT) has been rechartered. The effective date 
of the renewed charter is August 31, 2018.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Robert Walsh, Executive Secretary, 
Advisory Committee on Organ Transplantation, Health Resources and 
Services Administration, Department of Health and Human Services, Room 
08W60, 5600 Fishers Lane, Rockville, Maryland 20857. Phone: (301) 443-
6839; fax: (301) 594-6095; email: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#1b696c7a7768735b7369687a357c746d"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="314346505d425971594342501f565e47">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:  The ACOT was authorized by section 121.12 
of the amended Final Rule of the Organ Procurement and Transplantation 
Network (OPTN) (42 CFR part 121). In accordance with the Federal 
Advisory Committee Act (FACA), Public Law 92-463, it was initially 
chartered on September 1, 2000, and was renewed at the appropriate 
intervals.
    The ACOT provides advice to the Secretary on all aspects of organ 
donation, procurement, allocation, and transplantation, and on such 
other matters that the Secretary determines. The recommendations of the 
ACOT will facilitate the Department's efforts to oversee the Organ 
Procurement and Transplantation Network (OPTN), as set forth in the 
National Organ Transplant Act of 1984, as amended.
    The charter renewal for the ACOT was approved on August 31, 2018, 
which will also stand as the filing date. Renewal of the ACOT charter 
gives authorization for the Committee to operate until August 31, 2020.
    A copy of the ACOT charter is available on the ACOT website at: 
http://www.organdonor.gov/legislation/advisory.html. A copy of the 
charter can also be obtained by accessing the FACA database that is 
maintained by the Committee Management Secretariat under the General 
Services Administration. The website for the FACA database is http://www.facadatabase.gov/.

Amy P. McNulty,
Acting Director, Division of the Executive Secretariat.
[FR Doc. 2018-19454 Filed 9-6-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4165-15-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
----

**Exhibit      32.01**

**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

| 1 | the                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|---|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2 | the                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the                Company                as of the dates and for the periods explained in the                report. |
|---|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| /s/                Michael Garin       | /s/                Wallace Macmillan   |
|----------------------------------------|----------------------------------------|
| Michael                Garin           | Wallace                Macmillan       |
| Chief                Executive Officer | Chief                Financial Officer |
|                                   |                                   |
| March                15, 2006          |                                   |

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                                                     5
<LEGEND>
     This schedule  contains summary  financial  information  extracted from the
financial   statements   of  Global   Telecommunication   Solutions,   Inc.  and
subsidiaries  as of  December  31,  1997 and is  qualified  in its  entirety  by
reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                           Year
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                       DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                          JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                            DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                  7,867,566
<SECURITIES>                            0
<RECEIVABLES>                           3,206,878
<ALLOWANCES>                            570,000
<INVENTORY>                             174,112
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                        6,872,255
<PP&E>                                  2,164,940
<DEPRECIATION>                          679,892
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                          16,252,858
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                   10,251,318
<BONDS>                                 0
<COMMON>                                50,648
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                   0
<PREFERRED>                             0
<OTHER-SE>                              1,463,960
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>            16,252,858
<SALES>                                 18,234,640
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                        18,234,640
<CGS>                                   16,249,773
<TOTAL-COSTS>                           26,406,488
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                        0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                        0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                      1,368,307
<INCOME-PRETAX>                         (25,535,939)
<INCOME-TAX>                            0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                     (25,535,939)
<DISCONTINUED>                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                         0
<CHANGES>                               0
<NET-INCOME>                            (25,535,939)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                           (7.47)
<EPS-DILUTED>                           (7.47)
        


</TABLE>
Order entered December 19 , 2019

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05 - 19 - 01229 - CV KALEI MERRILL, Appellant /Cross - Appellee V. MITCHELL CURRY, MELI NDA DEFELICE AND TAM IRA GRIFFIN, EACH INDIVIDUALLY AS DEFE NDANTS, Appellee s /Cross - Appellants On Appeal from the 380th Judicial District Court

Collin County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 380 - 01827 - 2019



### O RDER Before the Court is appellant /cross

- appellee ’s December 16, 2019 unopp osed motion for a fourteen

- day extension of time t o file her combined appellant’s reply and cross

- appellee’s response brief. We GRANT the order and extend the time to January 14, 2020
. /s/ KEN MOLBERG JUSTICE
| (1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                    | By:    |   /s/ Avner Gal                                     |
|-------------------------|--------|----------------------------------------------------------|
| Date: December 29, 2011 |   |   Avner Gal                                         |
|                    |   |   Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer |

----
Exhibit 32.1




Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the


Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002




I, John J. Patrick, Chief Executive Officer and President of First Connecticut Bancorp, Inc., a Maryland corporation (the “Company”), certify in my capacity as an officer of the Company that I have reviewed the quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2011 (the “Report”) and that to the best of their knowledge:




1.
the Report fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




2.
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Date: November 14, 2011

/s/ John J. PatrickJohn J. Patrick, Jr.Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer




A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Potomac Bancshares, Inc. (the
company) on Form 10-K/A for the period ending December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Gayle Marshall Johnson, Sr. Vice President and Chief Financial
Officer of the company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the company.



|                                              
|----------------------------------------------
|/s/ Gayle Marshall Johnson                    
|Gayle Marshall Johnson                        
|Sr. Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
|April 30, 2009                                



9
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Anthony Malatesta, Appellant.

Appeal by the defendant from two judgments of the County Court, Suffolk County (Mazzei, J.), both rendered March 9, 1990, convicting him of burglary in the third degree under Indictment Number 1814/ 88, and criminal possession of stolen property in the third degree under Indictment Number 391/89, upon his pleas of guilty, and imposing sentences.

Ordered that the judgments are affirmed.

The defendant contends that the County Court erred by not affording him an opportunity to withdraw his pleas of guilty before imposing sentences higher than those originally negotiated in the plea agreement. Although that is the usual rule *(see, Santobello v New York,*404 US 257), it does not apply in the instant case. Taken as a whole, the record indicates the clear intent of the court to condition the promised sentences upon the defendant’s appearance on the date scheduled for sentencing. Because defendant failed to appear on the scheduled date, the court was no longer bound by its promise and was free to impose higher sentences *(see, People v Parker,*172 *693AD2d 697 [decided herewith]; *People v Gamble,*111 AD2d 869; *People v McDaniels,*111 AD2d 876). Thompson, J. P., Kunzeman, Eiber, Rosenblatt and Ritter, JJ., concur.