alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Update to AgInfomatics Meeting Minutes from January 22, 2015 Meeting

The links provided below take you to each report on the Value of Neonicotinoids completed by 

the study sponsors and made available to the US EPA. 

The Value of Neonicotinoids in North American Agriculture: An Economic Assessment of 

the Benefits of Nitroguanidine Neonicotinoid Insecticides in the United States and Canada

http://growingmatters.org/studies/economic/study/

The Value of Neonicotinoids in North American Agriculture: Executive Summary

http://growingmatters.org/studies/ag-executive/study/

The Value of Neonicotinoids in North American Agriculture: A Meta-Analysis Approach 

to Estimating the Yield Effects of Neonicotinoids

http://growingmatters.org/studies/yield/

The Value of Neonicotinoids in Turf and Ornamentals: Executive Summary 

http://growingmatters.org/studies/toexecutive/

The Value of Neonicotinoids in Turf and Ornamentals: The Value of Neoicotinoids in Turf 

and Ornamental Professionals

http://growingmatters.org/studies/professional/

The Value of Neonicotinoids in Turf and Ornamentals: A Case Study of Neonicotinoids Use 

for Controlling Emerald Ash Borer – The Naperville, Illinois Experience

http://growingmatters.org/studies/eab/

The Value of Neonicotinoids in Turf and Ornamentals: A Case Study of Neonicotinoids Use 

for Controlling Chinch Bug in Florida, St. Augustine grass

http://growingmatters.org/studies/turf/

The Value of Neonicotinoids in Turf and Ornamentals: A Case Study of Neonicotinoids Use 

for Controlling Silverleaf Whitefly in Ornamentals

http://growingmatters.org/studies/whitefly/

The Value of Neonicotinoids in North American Agriculture: Estimated Impact of 

Neonicotinoid Insecticides on Pest Management Practices and Costs for U.S. Corn, 

Soybean, Wheat, Cotton and Sorghum Farmers

http://growingmatters.org/studies/estimating/
The Value of Neonicotinoids in Turf and Ornamentals: Estimating the Economic Value of 

Neonicotinoid Insecticides on Flowers, Shrubs, Home Lawns and Trees in the Homescape

http://growingmatters.org/studies/homescape/

The Value of Neonicotinoids in North American Agriculture: Value of Insect Pest 

Management to U.S. and Canadian Corn, Soybean and Canola Farmers

http://growingmatters.org/studies/value/

The Value of Neonicotinoids in North American Agriculture: Methods and Assumptions 

for Estimating the Impact of Neonicotinoid Insecticides on Pest Management Practices and 

Costs for U.S. Corn, Soybean, Wheat, Cotton and Sorghum Farmers

http://growingmatters.org/studies/methods/

The Value of Neonicotinoids in North American Agriculture: Case Study: Neonicotinoid 

Use in Florida Citrus

http://growingmatters.org/studies/citrus/

The Value of Neonicotinoids in North American Agriculture: Case Study: Neonicotinoid 

Use in Mid-South Cotton

http://growingmatters.org/studies/cotton/

The Value of Neonicotinoids in North American Agriculture: Case Study: A Summary of 

Grower and Agri-Professional Perspectives From Regional Listening Sessions in the United 

States and Canada

http://growingmatters.org/studies/listening/
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Intelligence AgencyCOMMITTED TO EXCELLENCE IN DEFENSE OF THE NATION

Search
Search

Search
                    - Facilities Operating Status
                    - Employee Resources

-  Home		 
-  About    -  FAQs             
  -  Organization      -  Locations             
    -  Missile and Space Intelligence Center             
    -  Joint Military Attache School             
    -  Joint Military Intelligence Training Center 
  -  Open Source Intelligence             
  -  Equal Opportunity & Diversity             
  -  History      -  DIA Museum             
    -  George Washington Letters             
    -  Directors of DIA             
    -  The Historians 
  -  Sexual Assault Prevention and Response             
  -  Contact Us 
-  News & Features    -  Articles             
  -  Videos             
  -  DIA in the News             
  -  Threat Reports             
  -  Photo Gallery             
  -  No FEAR             
  -  Podcasts 
-  Careers & Opportunities    -  Career Fields      -  Analysis             
    -  Counterintelligence             
    -  Finance & Acquisition             
    -  Human Intelligence             
    -  Human Services             
    -  Information Technology             
    -  Inspector General             
    -  Legal             
    -  Mission Management             
    -  Office Management & Infrastructure             
    -  Science & Technology             
    -  Security 
  -  Search Vacancies             
  -  Apply to DIA             
  -  Hiring Process             
  -  Internships             
  -  Veteran Programs 
-  Business    -  Contractor Personnel Security             
  -  SIA3             
  -  SITE III             
  -  Innovation             
  -  NeedipeDIA             
  -  Office of Small Business Programs             
  -  Small Business FAQs 

HOMENEWS & FEATURES

Search

Search

                            - All Images 
                            - Other 

                            - Upload Date
                            - Photo Date
                            - Title

Share

----

Download Image: Small ()Medium ()Full Size (0.12 MB)

Tags:

Photo by:VIRIN: 

Photo Gallery
**Exhibit 3.3**

**AMENDMENT NO. 1**

**TO**

**AMENDED AND RESTATED TRUST AGREEMENT**

**OF**

**SANDRIDGE MISSISSIPPIAN TRUST I**

WHEREAS, SandRidge Mississippian Trust I (the “Trust”) has determined that defects exist in (i) the second sentence ofSection 6.02(a) of the Amended and Restated Trust Agreement of the Trust, dated as of April 12, 2011 (“Trust Agreement”), in that the phrase “an unsecured lien,” which has no cognizable legal meaning, appears; and(ii) Section 6(c) of Annex A to the Trust Agreement, in that a party unrelated to the Trust and its U.S. federal income tax affairs is named as the “Tax Matters Partner” therein; and 

WHEREAS, in accordance with Section 10.02(a) of the Trust Agreement, the Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A., as trustee(“the Trustee”), may amend the Trust Agreement to correct such defects without the approval of the unitholders of the Trust; and 

WHEREAS, the Trustee wishes to correct such defects by executing this Amendment; 

NOW, THEREFORE, the Trust Agreement shall be amended as follows: 

1. The second sentence of Section 6.02(a) is amended by removing “an unsecured lien” and replacing such phrase with “a lien”; and 

2. Section 6(c) of Annex A is amended by removing “Energy Corporation of America” and replacing such phrase with“SandRidge Exploration and Production, LLC”. 

*     *     *
Exhibit 32.1




Certification of Principal Executive Officer


Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to


Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of WRASP 34, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Richard A. Rappaport, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:





(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/ Richard A. RappaportRichard A. RappaportPrincipal Executive OfficerMay 11, 2011
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM MARCH 31,
1997 QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED> 
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                          48,990
<SECURITIES>                                    14,468
<RECEIVABLES>                                  517,555
<ALLOWANCES>                                    67,954
<INVENTORY>                                    100,744
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               718,959
<PP&E>                                       2,124,987
<DEPRECIATION>                                 961,299
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,303,246
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          831,531
<BONDS>                                        433,693
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                    576,379
<COMMON>                                        93,620
<OTHER-SE>                                     668,873
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,303,246
<SALES>                                        773,882
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               773,882
<CGS>                                          398,408
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  398,408
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 5,605
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              10,012
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 79,365
<INCOME-TAX>                                    34,132
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             45,233
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    45,233
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .37
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .36
        

</TABLE>
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Denali Commission","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.denali.gov","author_name":"denaliadmin","author_url":"https:\/\/www.denali.gov\/author\/denaliadmin\/","title":"DEADLINE EXTENDED for August 2023 Biomass Gap Funding Request for Statements of Interest, now due 5:00 P.M. AKDT on Friday, 20 October 2023","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"ggSWPkgdCs\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.denali.gov\/august-2023-biomass-gap-funding-request-for-statements-of-interest-due-500-p-m-akdt-on-friday-22-september-2023\/\">DEADLINE EXTENDED for August 2023 Biomass Gap Funding Request for Statements of Interest, now due 5:00 P.M. AKDT on Friday, 20 October 2023<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.denali.gov\/august-2023-biomass-gap-funding-request-for-statements-of-interest-due-500-p-m-akdt-on-friday-22-september-2023\/embed\/#?secret=ggSWPkgdCs\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“DEADLINE EXTENDED for August 2023 Biomass Gap Funding Request for Statements of Interest, now due 5:00 P.M. AKDT on Friday, 20 October 2023” — Denali Commission\" data-secret=\"ggSWPkgdCs\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.denali.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/cropped-low-res-from-web-150x150-1.png","thumbnail_width":150,"thumbnail_height":150}
# The Beginnings of DIA

/ Published May 1, 2015

On Oct. 1, 1961, with only 25 personnel and borrowed space in the Pentagon, the Defense Intelligence Agency was born.

The Agency would go on to manage and direct an increasing array of missions and functions that provide intelligence support to the national command authority and the warfighter.

The Department of Defense issued DoD Directive 5105.21 (referred to as DIA’s charter) in August 1961, which directed the establishment of the DIA.

The creation of the Agency was the result of recommendations contained in a 1960 report prepared by the Joint Study Group on Foreign Intelligence Activities of the United States Government, and from Secretary of Defense Robert McNamara’s own desire to achieve unity of effort in the production of military intelligence through a more effective management of DoD intelligence resources.

It is important to note that the DIA charter explicitly states that the chain of command “shall run from the Secretary of Defense, through the Joint Chiefs of Staff to the Director, DIA.”To accomplish McNamara’s goals, DoDD 5105.21 outlined 19 discrete functions for the new agency with two more functions added by 1963. In fact, the 23 functions originating from the 1960s represent the lion’s share of the functions marking the Agency’s historical evolution. Some of the more important functions included:

     • The development and production of all DoD intelligence estimates, as well as DoD information and contributions to national estimates.     • The assembly, integration and validation of all DoD intelligence requirements and the assignment of relative priorities.     • Establishing a single DoD collection requirements registry and facility.     • Providing plans, programs, policies and procedures for DoD collection activities.     • Providing the Department of Defense with current intelligence.     • Establishing and maintaining the DoD Indications Center.Other functions included the improvement of managerial and economic efficiencies, research and development requirements, planning and integration of DoD intelligence and counterintelligence training, cooperation with other intelligence organizations for mutual support, and integration of DoD intelligence automatic data processing plans and programs.Sixty years later, DIA is now responsible for over 80 critical national security and defense functions.
#### In the Matter of J. Paul Troue, for Reinstatement as an Attorney.

Application for reinstatement granted and petitioner, J. Paul Troue, reinstated as an attorney and counselor at law in the State of New York, effective immediately. Order entered. Weiss, J. P., Yesawich, Jr., Mercure, Crew III and Harvey, JJ. concur.
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Intelligence AgencyCOMMITTED TO EXCELLENCE IN DEFENSE OF THE NATION

Search
Search

Search
                    - Facilities Operating Status
                    - Employee Resources

-  Home		 
-  About    -  FAQs             
  -  Organization      -  Locations             
    -  Missile and Space Intelligence Center             
    -  Joint Military Attache School             
    -  Joint Military Intelligence Training Center 
  -  Open Source Intelligence             
  -  Equal Opportunity & Diversity             
  -  History      -  DIA Museum             
    -  George Washington Letters             
    -  Directors of DIA             
    -  The Historians 
  -  Sexual Assault Prevention and Response             
  -  Contact Us 
-  News & Features    -  Articles             
  -  Videos             
  -  DIA in the News             
  -  Threat Reports             
  -  Photo Gallery             
  -  No FEAR             
  -  Podcasts 
-  Careers & Opportunities    -  Career Fields      -  Analysis             
    -  Counterintelligence             
    -  Finance & Acquisition             
    -  Human Intelligence             
    -  Human Services             
    -  Information Technology             
    -  Inspector General             
    -  Legal             
    -  Mission Management             
    -  Office Management & Infrastructure             
    -  Science & Technology             
    -  Security 
  -  Search Vacancies             
  -  Apply to DIA             
  -  Hiring Process             
  -  Internships             
  -  Veteran Programs 
-  Business    -  Contractor Personnel Security             
  -  SIA3             
  -  SITE III             
  -  Innovation             
  -  NeedipeDIA             
  -  Office of Small Business Programs             
  -  Small Business FAQs 

HOMENEWS & FEATURES

Search

Search

                            - All Images 
                            - Other 

                            - Upload Date
                            - Photo Date
                            - Title

Share

----

Download Image: Small ()Medium ()Full Size (3.16 MB)

Tags:Mountain Home Air Force Base, 25th anniversary, Desert Storm

Photo by:VIRIN: 

Photo Gallery
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.
1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of UBI Blockchain
Internet, LTD (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q/A for the three months ended November 30, 2016, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Tony Liu, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
to the best of my knowledge and belief, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

| | i. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C.
78m(a) or 78o(d)); and
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | ii. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: April 14, 2017





/s/ Tony Liu

Tony Liu,

(Principal Executive Officer)
Exhibit 32.2





STATEMENT FURNISHED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of China Hefeng Rescue Equipment, Inc. (the "Company") for the quarter ended June 30, 2012:





I, Wenqi Yao, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that:





1.            Such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending June 30, 2012, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.            The information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending June 30, 2012, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date: August 17, 2012
By:
/s/ Wenqi YaoWenqi YaoChief Financial Officer(Principal Financial Officer)
----

Authorisation of State aid pursuant to Article 61 of the EEA Agreement and Article 1(3) in Part I of Protocol 3 to the Surveillance and Court Agreement

The EFTA Surveillance Authority has decided that the notified measure is compatible with the EEA Agreement

(2005/C 103/11)

Date of adoption: 

EFTA State: Norway

Aid No: 55363

Title: Prolongation of a temporary grant scheme for the shipbuilding industry

Objective: To offset the adverse effects caused by the unfair competitive practices of the Republic of Korea

Legal basis: Act relating to State aid (‘Lov om offentlig støtte av 27 november 1992’) and Regulation amending Regulation on State Aid to Shipbuilding (‘Forskrift om endring av forskrift 19. mars 1999 nr. 246 om gjennomføring av EØS-avtalens bestemmelser om offentlig støtte til skipsbyggingsindustrien’) implementing Council Regulation (EC) No 502/2004 amending Regulation (EC) No 1177/2002 concerning a temporary mechanism to shipbuilding as incorporated into Annex XV to the EEA Agreement by EEA Joint Committee Decision No 80/2004 of 8 June 2004.

Budget: NOK 300 million, some EUR 37 million (the total period from 15 March 2003 until 31 March 2005)

Duration: Prolongation from 1 April 2004 until 31 March 2005.

----
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Keith Verdon, Appellant.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Nassau County (Harrington, J.), rendered January 22, 1990, convicting him of criminal possession of a weapon in the fourth degree (two counts), upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, and the matter is remitted to the County Court, Nassau County, for further proceedings pursuant to CPL 460.50 (5).

Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution *(see, People v Contes,*60 NY2d 620), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Moreover, resolution of issues of credibility, as well as the weight to be accorded the evidence, are primarily questions to be determined by the jury, which saw and heard the witnesses *(see, People v Gaimari,*176 NY 84, 94). Its determination should be accorded great weight on appeal and should not be disturbed unless clearly unsupported by the record *(see, People v Garafolo,*44 AD2d 86, 88). Upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict was not against the weight of the evidence *(see,*CPL 470.15 [5]).

The defendant’s contention that the trial court erred in refusing to charge justification as a defense to criminal possession of a weapon in the fourth degree is without merit. At trial, the defendant testified that he "grabbed the golf club” in *864order "to get my property back” from several teenagers he believed had stolen some items from his car. However, since no reasonable view of the defendant’s testimony supports the conclusion that he intended to use the golf club as a potential weapon in order to "prevent or terminate” the commission of a larceny, he was not entitled to a justification charge pursuant to Penal Law § 35.25. Sullivan, J. P., Eiber, Rosenblatt and Ritter, JJ., concur.