alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Denali Commission","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.denali.gov","author_name":"denaliadmin","author_url":"https:\/\/www.denali.gov\/author\/denaliadmin\/","title":"Congressional Budget Justification","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"5Ns3UoLpNP\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.denali.gov\/congressional-budget-justification\/\">Congressional Budget Justification<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.denali.gov\/congressional-budget-justification\/embed\/#?secret=5Ns3UoLpNP\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Congressional Budget Justification” — Denali Commission\" data-secret=\"5Ns3UoLpNP\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.denali.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/04\/dco-20-logo-vert-1.png","thumbnail_width":194,"thumbnail_height":548}
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 499 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 499

       To repeal the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 7, 2013

 Mr. Vitter (for himself and Mr. Cruz) introduced the following bill; 
     which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
       To repeal the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Patient Choice Restoration Act''.

SEC. 2. REPEAL.

    (a) In General.--The following Acts, and the amendments made by 
such Acts, are repealed:
            (1) The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (Public 
        Law 111-148).
            (2) The Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act of 
        2010 (Public Law 111-152).
    (b) Effect of Law.--The provisions of law amended by the Acts 
referred to in subsection (a) are restored as if such Acts had never 
been enacted.
                                 <all>
```
```

[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 172 (Wednesday, September 5, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Page 45149]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-19164]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE

Product Change--Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail, & First-
Class Package Service Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal ServiceTM.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Date of required notice: September 5, 2018.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Elizabeth Reed, 202-268-3179.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
August 29, 2018, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a USPS 
Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail, & First-Class 
Package Service Contract 45 to Competitive Product List. Documents are 
available at www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2018-216, CP2018-298.

Elizabeth Reed,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2018-19164 Filed 9-4-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
```
----

**Exhibit        32.1**

**CERTIFICATION        PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

|   | (1) | The                  Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or                  15(d) of                  the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                  and |
|--------|-----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The                  information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                  respects, the financial condition and results of operations of                  the                  Company. |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | /s/                  Jeffrey I. Badgley Jeffrey                  I. BadgleyPresident                  and Co-Chief Executive Officer |
|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT
OF 2002



In connection with the quarterly report of BioPower Operations
Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending February 28, 2013, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Robert Kohn, Principal Accounting and Financial Officer, Chief Executive Officer and
Chief Financial Officer, Secretary and Director of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant
to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



| | 1. | The quarterly report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
and
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the quarterly report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of the Company.
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------





|Date:  August 21, 2013 |  | BioPower Operations Corporation                                  
|---------------------- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------
|                       |  |                                                                  
|                       |  | By /s/ ROBERT D. KOHN                                            
|                       |  | Robert D. Kohn, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer,
|                       |  | Principal Accounting and Financial Officer and Director
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING

MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

MOISES RUBIO, DOC #H47218, )

)

Appellant, )

)

v. ) Case No. 2D18-2344

)

STATE OF FLORIDA, )

)

Appellee. )

)

Opinion filed July 12, 2019.

Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 

9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Polk 

County; Wayne M. Durden, Judge.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

SILBERMAN, BLACK, and BADALAMENTI, JJ., Concur.
| 1.     | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                                                                 |
|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                  |
| 2.     | The information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of ALTERNATIVE ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS, INC. |

| By:          | /s/ Scott Williams                                       |
|--------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Name:   | Scott Williams                                                                                                                                                                                                                                         |
| Title:  | President, Chief Executive Officer, Director                                                                                                                                                                                                           |
|         | (Principal Executive Officer)                                                                                                                                                                                                                          |
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

MALACHI BRITTINGHAM,

Defendant Below,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF DELAWARE,

Plaintiff Below,

Appellee.

§

§ 

§ No. 127, 2020

§

§ Court Below—Superior Court

§ of the State of Delaware

§ 

§ Cr. ID Nos. 1901009608, 

§ 1902011833, 1902017523 (N)

§

§

Submitted: April 30, 2020

Decided: May 4, 2020

Before SEITZ, Chief Justice; VALIHURA and VAUGHN, Justices.

ORDER

Having considered the notice to show cause and the response, it appears to the 

Court that:

(1) On March 27, 2020, the appellant, Malachi Brittingham, filed a notice 

of appeal from a Superior Court order refusing to consider his pro se motion to 

dismiss pending criminal charges because he was represented by counsel.

1

 The

Senior Court Clerk issued a notice directing Brittingham to show cause why this 

appeal should not be dismissed for this Court’s lack of jurisdiction to consider a 

 

1 Under Superior Court Criminal Rule 47, the Superior Court “will not consider pro se applications 

by defendants who are represented by counsel unless the defendant has been granted permission 

to participate with counsel in the defense.”
2

criminal interlocutory appeal. In his response to the notice to show cause,

Brittingham argues that review of his interlocutory appeal would serve a beneficial 

purpose.

(2) This Court may only review a final judgment in a criminal case.2 The 

Superior Court order refusing to consider Brittingham’s pro se motion to dismiss is 

not a final order.3 This appeal must be dismissed. 

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED, under Supreme Court Rule 29(b),

that this appeal is DISMISSED. 

BY THE COURT:

/s/ Karen L. Valihura

Justice 

 

2 Del. Const. art. IV, § 11(1)(b). See also Gottlieb v. State, 697 A.2d 400, 401 (Del. 1997) (holding 

this Court lacks jurisdiction to review interlocutory orders in criminal cases).

3 Cf. Brunhammer v. State, 2016 WL 611822, at *1 (Del. Feb. 12, 2016) (dismissing appeal from 

Superior Court order denying a motion to dismiss an indictment).
p.1 

OAR Box 1828 

Prepped by Ollie Stewart 

Document Number: 

113) ll-K-(B)-102 

Docket Number: 

A-83-27 

Printed 11/12/2008 11:12:52 AM Sheet 113 of 325 
P.2 

A-83-27 

ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS, INC. 

II-K-(B)-102 

April 6, 1983 

Ms. Judi Greenwald 

Office of Policy Analysis (PM-220) 

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 

401 M Street, S.W. 

Washington, D.C. 20461 

Subject: 1995 Projected Coal Demand in New Industrial Boilers 

for Basecase and 1.0 lb/MMBtu SO NSPS 

Dear Judi: 

Attached, as requested, are projected 1995 coal demand for new industrial boilers under a basecase and a 1.0 lb/MMBtu S02 NSPS. These IFCAM 

results are from previous model runs in August 1981, which is the most 

recent analysis of an S0? standard. 

I hope that this information satisfies your need, 

if you have any questions. 

Please give me a call 

Respectfully yours, 

Karl F. Held 

KFH:mk 

Attachment 

cc: Robert Short (EPA) 

Al Wehe (EPA) 
TABLE 1 

1995 PROJECTED COAL DEMAND IN NEW INDUSTRIAL BOILERS 1/2/ 

1. 

2. 

3. 

4. 

5. 

6. 

7. 

8. 

9. 

10. 

New England 

New York/New Jersey 

Middle Atlantic 

South Atlantic 

Midwest 

Southwest 

Central 

North Central 

West 

Northwest 

TOTAL 

Low 

(< 1 

sulfur coal 

.2 lb SO,) 

50 

0 

160 

2,410 

420 

760 

0 

550 

240 

230 

4,820 

(103 tons) 

Base Case 

High 

(> 

sulfur coal 

L.2 lb S0„) 

210 

1,270 

1,450 

6,010 

8,460 

33,760 

1,960 

1,970 

4,920 

1,620 

61,630 

1.0 

Low sulfur 

lb/MMBtu 

coal 

(< 1.2 lb S0„) 

160 

400 

680 

7,580 

4,960 

4,260 

590 

2,310 

0 

610 

21,550 

NSPS 

High 

(> 

3/ Case ' 

sulfur coal 

L.2 lb SOJ 

80 

780 

870 

0 

2,720 

23,610 

1,030 

110 

4,210 

990 

34,400 

1/ 

2/ 

3/ 

Outputs from IFCAM runs of August 11, 1981. These results are the latest available, but are obsolete for 

analyzing the NSPS. However, they can be used for sensitivity purposes in the preliminary evaluation of low 

sulfur coal availability and low sulfur coal prices. 

Industrial fuel use growth, its regional distribution, and fossil fuel prices are based on EIA's Annual Report to 

Congress, 1980. Projections use the medium price scenario, which assume 1985 and 1995 world crude oil prices of 

$34.00/barrel and $45.90/barrel, respectively (1978 $). 

1.0 lb SO standard applies to all new industrial coal boilers £ 10 MMBtu/hr. A PM standard of .05 lb/MMBtu also 

applies to all new coal boilers. In addition, the current NSPS for oil- and gas-fired boilers is extended to 

cover all new boilers £ 10 MMBtu/hr. 

CO
II 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 756 

To allow funds under title II of the Elementary and Secondary Education 

Act of 1965 to be used to provide training to school personnel regarding 

how to recognize child sexual abuse. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

APRIL 17, 2013 

Mrs. FEINSTEIN (for herself and Mr. BLUNT) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions 

A BILL 

To allow funds under title II of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 to be used to provide 

training to school personnel regarding how to recognize 

child sexual abuse. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Helping Schools Pro5 tect Our Children Act of 2013’’. 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 756 IS

1 SEC. 2. TRAINING TEACHERS TO RECOGNIZE CHILD SEX2 UAL ABUSE. 

3 (a) STATE ACTIVITIES.—Section 2113(c) of the Ele4 mentary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 

5 6613(c)) is amended by adding at the end the following: 

6 ‘‘(19) Providing training for all school per7 sonnel, including teachers, principals, and pupil serv8 ices personnel, regarding how to recognize child sex9 ual abuse.’’. 

10 (b) LOCAL EDUCATIONAL AGENCY ACTIVITIES.— 

11 Section 2123(a) of the Elementary and Secondary Edu12 cation Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 6623(a)) is amended by 

13 inserting after paragraph (8) the following: 

14 ‘‘(9) Providing training for all school personnel, 

15 including teachers, principals, and pupil services per16 sonnel, regarding how to recognize child sexual 

17 abuse.’’. 

18 (c) ELIGIBLE PARTNERSHIP ACTIVITIES.—Section 

19 2134(a) of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act 

20 of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 6634(a)) is amended— 

21 (1) in paragraph (1)(B), by striking ‘‘and’’ 

22 after the semicolon; 

23 (2) in paragraph (2)(C), by striking the period 

24 at the end and inserting ‘‘; and’’; and 

25 (3) by adding at the end the following: 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 756 IS

1 ‘‘(3) providing training for school personnel, in2 cluding teachers, principals, and pupil services per3 sonnel, regarding how to recognize child sexual 

4 abuse.’’. 

Æ 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
EXHIBIT 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of SSI Investments II Limited (the "Company") for the period ended October 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned, Charles E. Moran, Chief Executive Officer of the Company hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that, to his knowledge:





(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





SSI INVESTMENTS II LIMITEDDate: December 15, 2010
By:
/s/ Charles E. MoranCharles E. MoranPresident and Chief Executive Officer
EXHIBIT 31.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

I, Michael S. Gross, Chief Executive Officer of
Solar Senior Capital Ltd., certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Solar Senior Capital Ltd.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material
fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all
material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for
the registrant and have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which
this report is being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the
registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over
financial reporting; and

5. The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.

Dated this day of August 2, 2011



|                       
|-----------------------
|/S/    MICHAEL S.
GROSS
|Michael S. Gross
Exhibit 32.2


                                 CERTIFICATION

In connection with the annual report of Movie Gallery, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Thomas D.
Johnson, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that, to my knowledge:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company
     as of and for the periods covered in the report.


Date:   March 16, 2007


/s/ Thomas D. Johnson
-----------------------------------
Name: Thomas D. Johnson
Its:  Chief Financial Officer
I

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 3973

To expand the boundaries of the Piscataway National Park, and for other

purposes.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 8, 1994

Mr. HOYER (for himself and Mr. MORAN) introduced the following bill; which

was referred to the Committee on Natural Resources

A BILL

To expand the boundaries of the Piscataway National Park,

and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Piscataway National

5 Park Expansion Act of 1994’’.

6 SEC. 2. ACQUISITION OF LAND.

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subject to subsection (b), the Sec8 retary of the Interior is authorized to acquire land or in9 terests in land generally depicted on the drawing entitled
2

•HR 3973 IH

1 ‘‘Proposed Boundary Map—Piscataway Park’’, numbered

2 838–80137, and dated November 17, 1993.

3 (b) MEANS OF ACQUISITION.—The Secretary may ac4 quire the land or interests in land described in subsection

5 (a) by purchase, donation, exchange, or otherwise.

6 SEC. 3. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.

7 There is authorized to be appropriated such sums as

8 are necessary to carry out this Act.

Æ