alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Vincent Mela, Appellant.

Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from so much of a sentence of the County Court, Westchester County (Silverman, J.), imposed December 18, 1989, as, after a hearing, directed him to make restitution in the amount of $3,000 and to pay a mandatory surcharge, upon his conviction of criminal possession of stolen property in the third degree, after a plea of guilty.

Ordered that the sentence is reversed insofar as appealed from, on the law and as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice, the requirement that the defendant pay a surcharge *631is deleted, and the matter is remitted to the County Court, Westchester County, for a new hearing and determination concerning the amount of restitution and the manner of payment.

The defendant was afforded what purported to be a hearing on the amount of restitution to be made to the insurer of the stolen vehicle he illegally possessed *(see,*Penal Law § 60.27 [2]; *see also, People v Chery,*126 AD2d 659). However, the colloquy between the court and counsel and a review of an insurance company bill concerning the cost of a variety of repairs which the defendant did not concede warranted restitution and for which the court did not determine responsibility did not satisfy the requirement that the court conduct a hearing and determine the amount of the loss and the manner of payment (Penal Law § 60.27 [2]; *cf.,*CPL 400.30). There is, in any event, insufficient information in the hearing record regarding the manner in which the sentencing court ascertained the amount of restitution *(see, People v Collins,*163 AD2d 608; *People v Walker,*140 AD2d 655; *cf., People v Kade,*153 AD2d 907).

We reject the defendant’s contention that the People are barred from again attempting to establish the amount of damage caused by the offense *(see,*Penal Law § 60.27 [2]; *cf.,*CPL 400.30 [4]; *People v Sailor,*65 NY2d 224; *People v Havelka,*45 NY2d 636, 641-644). A new hearing and determination as to the amount of restitution to be made to the insurer is required. The defendant may at that time raise the issue of his financial inability to make restitution *(cf.,*CPL 420.10 [4]). Moreover, we agree with the defendant that it was error for the court to direct him to both make restitution and pay a surcharge *(see,*Penal Law § 60.35), since the two directives are inconsistent with each other *(see, People v Willis,*168 AD2d 470; *People v Turco,*130 AD2d 785, 788). Mangano, P. J., Kunzeman, Eiber, Harwood and Rosenblatt, JJ., concur.
#### In the Matter of Oscar Smukler.

Order entered reinstating petitioner as an attorney and counselor at law. Present—Boomer, ? J. P., Pine, Balio, Lawton and Davis, JJ.
Exhibit 32.1   CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Quarterly Report of Hazlo! Technologies, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Alejandra J. De La Torre, Chief Executive and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:  1.  The Report fully complies with requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.   Dated:  April 29, 2011  /s/ Alejandra J. De La Torre Alejandra J. De La Torre Title: Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE
OFFICER
Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350)



In connection with this Report on Form 10-Q
for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2017 (the "Report") of Garrison Capital Inc. (the "Registrant"), as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Joseph Tansey, Chief Executive Officer of the Registrant,
hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Registrant.
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------







|/s/ Joseph Tansey | 
|----------------- | 



Joseph Tansey

Chief Executive Officer

May 9, 2017
SEI-EX10.23_2013.12.31-K






EXHIBIT 10.23




SECOND AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT


WHEREAS, Seitel, Inc., a Delaware corporation (together with its successor and assigns, the "Company")  and Robert D. Monson (the "Executive")  have entered in an employment agreement dated January 30, 2007 (the "Agreement"); and


WHEREAS, Executive's Base Salary on April 30, 2009 was $630,000; and


WHEREAS, effective May 1, 2009 Executive voluntarily determined to reduce his Base Salary
as in effect on April 30, 2009 by 10% through December 31, 2009; and


WHEREAS, effective January 1, 2010 Executive has voluntarily determined to continue this 10% reduction in his Base Salary through December 31, 2010 and after December 31, 2010 his Base Salary shall return to the annual amount as in effect on April 30, 2009; and


WHEREAS, the Company and the Executive acknowledge that such a voluntary reduction in Executive's Base Salary by Executive is not the occurrence of a Good Reason as defined in the Agreement; and


WHEREAS, the Executive and the Company acknowledge and agree that this reduction is not in exchange for any other payment or benefit; and


WHEREAS, the Company and the Executive acknowledge and agree that the Company shall not be required to pay the amount of this 10% reduction in Base Salary to Executive at any time in the future.


NOW, THEREFORE, for the purposes of clarity, the Executive and Company hereby agree to add the following at the end of Section 4:


"During the calendar years 2009 and 2010 for all purposes under this Agreement respecting benefits payable upon termination of employment, Executive's Base Salary shall mean the amount of $630,000 as in effect on April 30, 2009 as previously  approved by the Company (or if applicable  any increase by  the  Company  above  such  amount)  shall  not  be  reduced  by  any  voluntary reduction in Base Salary by Executive."


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have executed this Agreement on January 25, 2010.


SEITEL, INC.
	
			
	By:
	/s/
	Marcia H. Kendrick

	Name:
	Marcia H. Kendrick

	Title:
	Senior Vice President








EXECUTIVE:
	
		
	/s/
	Robert D. Monson

	Robert D. Monson
Exhibit 32.1  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  The undersigned hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to their knowledge, the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A for the period ended March 31, 2012 of VB Clothing, Inc. (the Company) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and the information contained in such periodic report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in such report.  Very truly yours,   /s/ Anthony PasqualeAnthony PasqualeChief Executive Officer/s/ Anthony PasqualeAnthony PasqualeChief Financial OfficerDated: December 4, 2012   A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to VB Clothing, Inc. and will be furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

April 24, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor,
Chief Justice
131457 & (46) Michael F. Cavanagh

Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan Robert P. Young, Jr. JAMES GILLESPIE, Stephen J. Markman, Plaintiff-Appellee, Justices

v SC: 131457 COA: 268263 Wayne CC: 04-431052-CK RUSSELL FILTRATION, INC., and RANDAL J. ARMSTRONG, Defendants-Appellants.

________________ _______________ __________/

By order of September 26, 2006, this case was remanded to the Court of Appeals for an explanation of the conclusion that the defendants’ application for leave to appeal grossly disregarded the requirements of a fair pr esentation of the issues to the court. On March 8, 2007, the Court of Ap peals issued an opinion stati ng reasons for the sanctions it imposed pursuant to MCR 7.216 (C)(1)(b). On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the May 5, 2006 order of th e Court of Appeals is again considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.

s0416 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

April 24, 2007

Clerk
### THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13

- 17

- 00494

- CR

The State of Texas v. Ricardo Mata
On Appeal from the 93rd District Court of Hidalgo County , Texas Trial Cause No. CR

- 2611

- 16

- B

JUDGMENT THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause o n appeal, concludes that the judgment of the trial court should be affirmed in part and reversed in part, and the case should be remanded to the trial court . The Court orders the judgment of the trial court AFFIRMED IN PART and REVERSED IN PART, and the

c ase REMANDED for further proceedings consistent with its opinion

. We further order this decision certified below for observance. July 11, 2019
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 663 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 663

 To provide for the inclusion of the State of California as a separate 
    Federal milk marketing order upon the petition and approval of 
             California dairy producers of such inclusion.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 22, 2013

Mrs. Feinstein introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
   referred to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To provide for the inclusion of the State of California as a separate 
    Federal milk marketing order upon the petition and approval of 
             California dairy producers of such inclusion.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``California Milk Marketing Order 
Act''.

SEC. 2. INCLUSION OF CALIFORNIA AS SEPARATE MILK MARKETING ORDER.

    (a) Inclusion Authorized.--Upon the petition and approval of 
California dairy producers in the manner provided in section 8c of the 
Agricultural Adjustment Act (7 U.S.C. 608c), reenacted with amendments 
by the Agricultural Marketing Agreement Act of 1937, the Secretary of 
Agriculture shall designate the State of California as a separate 
Federal milk marketing order.
    (b) Special Considerations.--If designated under subsection (a), 
the order covering California shall have the right to reblend and 
distribute order receipts to recognize quota value.
                                 <all>
```
```

[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 170 (Thursday, September 1, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 54524]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-22396]

[[Page 54524]]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Office of the Secretary

Notice of Applications for Certificates of Public Convenience and 
Necessity and Foreign Air Carrier Permits Filed Under Subpart B 
(Formerly Subpart Q) during the Week Ending August 20, 2011

    The following Applications for Certificates of Public Convenience 
and Necessity and Foreign Air Carrier Permits were filed under subpart 
B (formerly subpart Q) of the Department of Transportation's Procedural 
Regulations (See 14 CFR 301.201 et seq.). The due date for Answers, 
Conforming Applications, or Motions to Modify Scope are set forth below 
for each application. Following the Answer period DOT may process the 
application by expedited procedures. Such procedures may consist of the 
adoption of a show-cause order, a tentative order, or in appropriate 
cases a final order without further proceedings.
    Docket Number: DOT-OST-2011-0150.
    Date Filed: August 15, 2011.
    Due Date for Answers, Conforming Applications, or Motion To Modify 
Scope: September 6, 2011.
    Description:
    Application of Universal Jet Aviation, Inc. (``Universal'') 
requesting a certificate of public convenience and necessity 
authorizing Universal to engage in foreign charter air transportation 
of persons, property and mail.
    Docket Number: DOT-OST-2011-0151.
    Date Filed: August 15, 2011.
    Due Date for Answers, Conforming Applications, or Motion To Modify 
Scope: September 6, 2011.
    Description:
    Application of Universal Jet Aviation, Inc. (``Universal'') 
requesting a certificate of public convenience and necessity 
authorizing Universal to engage in interstate charter air 
transportation of persons, property and mail with a Boeing Business Jet 
aircraft.
    Docket Number: DOT-OST-2003-16308.
    Date Filed: August 16, 2011.
    Due Date for Answers, Conforming Applications, or Motion To Modify 
Scope: September 6, 2011.
    Description:
    Application of Grupo Aereo Monterrey, S.A. de C.V., d/b/a 
Magnicharters requesting a foreign air carrier permit and supplement to 
application for an exemption to engage in charter foreign air 
transportation of passengers between the United States and Mexico and 
to conduct other passenger charter operations in accordance with 14 CFR 
part 212.

Renee V. Wright,
Program Manager, Docket Operations, Federal Register Liaison.
[FR Doc. 2011-22396 Filed 8-31-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-9XP
```
Exhibit 32.1

                Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C Section 1350,
      as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of  clickNsettle.com,  Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-KSB for the year ended June 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Form 10-KSB"), I, Roy Israel, Chief
Executive  Officer of the  Company,  certify,  pursuant  to 18 U.S.C.  1350,  as
adopted pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that;

      (1)   The Form 10-KSB  fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section
            13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m
            or 78o(d)); and

      (2)   The information contained in the Form 10-KSB fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.

Dated:  September 18, 2006

/s/ Roy Israel
------------------------------------
Roy Israel - Chairman of the Board, CEO and President
EXHIBIT 13

                  SARBANES-OXLEY ACT SECTION 906 CERTIFICATIONS

      In connection with the annual report on Form 20-F, as amended by this Form
20-F/A, of Grupo Elektra, S.A. de C.V. for the period ended December 31, 2002,
Javier Sarro Cortina, Chief Executive Officer of Grupo Elektra, S.A. de C.V. and
Rodrigo Pliego Abraham, Chief Financial Officer of Grupo Elektra, S.A. de C.V.,
each hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C.ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant toss.906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      1. The Form 20-F, as amended by this Form 20-F/A, for the period ended
December 31, 2002 fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      2. The information contained in the Form 20-F, as amended by this Form
20-F/A, for the period ended December 31, 2002 fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Grupo Elektra,
S.A. de C.V.

Date: July 16, 2003
                                       /s/ Javier Sarro Cortina
                                       -------------------------------------
                                       Javier Sarro Cortina
                                       Chief Executive Officer
                                       (Principal Executive Officer)

Date: July 16, 2003
                                       /s/ Rodrigo Pliego Abraham
                                       -------------------------------------
                                       Rodrigo Pliego Abraham
                                       Chief Financial Officer
                                       (Principal Financial Officer)

      A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to Grupo Elektra, S.A. de C.V. and will be retained by Grupo
Elektra, S.A. de C.V. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
its staff upon request.
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court 

Lansing, Michigan 

November 29, 2005 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 129226 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman, PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Justices 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 129226 

 COA: 260689 
 Wayne CC: 00-008201

ROBERT EARL WALKER,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the July 26, 2005 order 

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has 

failed to meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D). 

d1121 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

November 29, 2005 

Clerk
Certification of CEO and CFO Pursuant to 
18 U.S.C. Section 1350,



As Adopted Pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Firsthand Technology Value Fund, Inc. (the “Company”) for the quarter ended June 30, 2019, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), Kevin Landis and Omar Billawala, as Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:



|(1) | The report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 134; and
|--- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                                     | 
|-------------------------------------------------------------------- | 
|Name: Kevin LandisTitle: Chief Executive OfficerDate: August 9, 2019 | 
|                                                                     | 
|Name: Omar BillawalaTitle: Financial OfficerDate: August 9, 2019     |
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Ramon Guzman, Appellant.

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Shirley Levittan, J.), rendered on June 27, 1989, convicting defendant upon a plea of guilty of three counts of robbery in the second degree and sentencing defendant to indeterminate terms of imprisonment of *SVz*to 10 *Vi*years to run concurrently, unanimously affirmed.

We are unpersuaded that the sentence imposed was unduly harsh or severe. Taking into account, "among other things, the crime charged, the particular circumstances of the individual before the court and the purpose of a penal sanction”, we perceive no abuse of discretion warranting a reduction in sentence. *(People v Farrar,*52 NY2d 302, 305.)

Further, defendant was sentenced in accordance with his plea bargain and within statutory guidelines. "Having received the benefit of his bargain, defendant should be bound by its terms.” *(People v Felman,*141 AD2d 889, 890, *lv denied*72 NY2d 918.) Concur—Sullivan, J. P., Wallach, Asch and Smith, JJ.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Potomac Bancshares, Inc. (the company) on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Gayle Marshall Johnson, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

| | 1)          The   Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the   Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                              
| | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |                                                                                                                                                                    
| | 2)          The   information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material   respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the company.

|/s/  GAYLE MARSHALL   JOHNSON                | 
|-------------------------------------------- | 
|                                             | 
|Gayle   Marshall Johnson                     | 
|Vice   President and Chief Financial Officer | 
|March 30, 2005                               |