alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
From: Bart Brashers <bbrashers@environcorp.com>

Sent: Thursday, June 12, 2014 3:42 PM

To: Krivo, Stan

Cc: Shepherd, Lorinda; Jill Webster (Jill_Webster@fws.gov); Michael Carbon
Subject: Statoil: More information requested on VISIBILTY modeling

Attachments: Otto_Candies

- Peyton.pdf

Stan,

In response to your phone call today, here’s more information on the Statoil modeling. This is “for the

record”.

24

- hour VISIBILITY modeling:

The VOLUME sources were based on ship dimensions. In the CALPUFF input files, you can find (for each of the sources VOL01 through VOL100):

Effective height = 3.66 m

Base Elevation = 0 m
Initial Sigma Y = 4.26 m
Initial Sigma Z = 1.70 m

The file Otto_Candies_Peyton.pdf (enclosed) shows the beam (listed as “Beam Molded” ) is 18.3 m, and the height (listed as “Depth Molded”) is 7.32 m.

The effective height is half the physical height: 7.32 / 2 = 3.66 m.

The base elevation is sea level. The initial Sigma Y is the physical width divided by 4.3: 18.3 / 4.3 = 4.29 m (note th e conservative typo). The initial Sigma Z is the physical height divided by 4.3: 7.32 / 4.3 = 1.70 m.

This follows the guidance from the ISCST3 user manual, which is also referenced in the AERMOD

manual. It’s also very similar to the recommendations of the Haul Roads Working Group.

Note: because Sigma Z used the physical height divided by 4.3 (not divided by 2.15; i.e. the full plume, not the half plume) the center of the plume is at half the physical height, which is why the effe ctive height parameter is the physical height divided by 2.

The emission rate for each VOLUME source is simply the summed maximum short

- term (hourly)
emission rate divided by the number of volume sources used, i.e. 100. The summed maximum short

term emis sion rate is just the sum of the emission rates of two OSVs and the two Crewboats.

Please let me know if the above answers your questions about the VISIBILITY modeling I sent to Jill Webster (FWS).

I will send you a separate email about the Annual Modeli ng shortly.

BartBart Brashers | Atmospheric Scientist

Senior Manager, ENVIRON International Corporation

19020 33 rd Ave W Ste 310 | Lynnwood WA 98036

T: +1 425

- 412

- 1812 | F: +1 425

- 412

- 1840 | M: +1 206

- 550

- 2606 bbrashers@environcorp.com



### This message contains information that may be confidential, privileged or otherwise protected by

law from disclosure. It is intended for the exclusive u se of the Addressee(s). Unless you are the addressee or authorized agent of the addressee, you may not review, copy, distribute or disclose to anyone the message or any information contained within. If you have received this message in error, please contac t the sender by electronic reply to email@environcorp.com and immediately delete all copies of the message.
**
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**

**PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)**

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2017 (the “Report”) of Solar Senior Capital Ltd. (the “Registrant”), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I,RICHARD L. PETEKA, the Chief Financial Officer of the Registrant, hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge, that: 

(1) The Reportfully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and 

(2) Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant. 

 
 
/s/    RICHARD L. PETEKA
**Name:** **Richard L. Peteka****Date:** **November 2, 2017****
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLAImages

# DLA Images

Search

Search

                                  - All Images 
                                  - Other 

                                  - Upload Date
                                  - Photo Date
                                  - Title

Share

----

Download Image: Small ()Medium ()Full Size (0.09 MB)

Tags:DLA Distribution, Defense Logistics Agency Distribution, DLA Distribution Headquarters, PBL, F-100 series, dla, performance based logistics, DoD, Defense Logistics Agency

Photo by:VIRIN: 

Photo Gallery
#### STATE of Florida ex rel. Elpidio MORALEZ, Relator, v. Honorable Gene WILLIAMS, Circuit Judge of the Eleventh Judicial Circuit of Florida, Criminal Division, Respondent.

No. 73-297.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

March 13, 1973.

PER CURIAM.

Prohibition dismissed.
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4037 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4037

 To amend title 23, United States Code, to provide for designation of 
          the National Highway System, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 15, 1994

 Mr. Rahall (for himself, Mr. Mineta, Mr. Shuster, and Mr. Petri) (all 
 by request) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
              Committee on Public Works and Transportation

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend title 23, United States Code, to provide for designation of 
          the National Highway System, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``National Highway System Designation 
Act of 1994''.

SEC. 2. NATIONAL HIGHWAY SYSTEM DESIGNATION.

    Section 103 of title 23, United States Code, is amended by 
inserting after subsection (b) the following:
    ``(c) Designation.--
            ``(1) Submission.--The National Highway System as submitted 
        by the Secretary of Transportation is hereby designated within 
        the United States, including the District of Columbia and the 
        Commonwealth of Puerto Rico.
            ``(2) Modifications.--At the request of a State, the 
        Secretary may add new National Highway System segments, 
        including intermodal connections, and delete existing route 
        segments and connections provided that the total National 
        Highway System miles do not exceed 165,000 miles (265,542 
        kilometers). The States shall establish that the requested 
        route changes have been identified cooperatively with local 
        officials through the metropolitan and statewide transportation 
        planning processes carried out in accordance with sections 134 
        and 135 of this title. The Secretary shall determine that the 
        requested changes meet criteria established for the National 
        Highway System and shall determine that the requested changes 
        enhance the national transportation characteristics of the 
        National Highway System.''.

                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF DORSEY TRAILERS, INC. FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
1996 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>   1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                             101
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    8,464
<ALLOWANCES>                                       168
<INVENTORY>                                     19,002
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               300,389
<PP&E>                                          17,474
<DEPRECIATION>                                   7,793
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  45,019
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           27,533
<BONDS>                                         12,576
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            49
<OTHER-SE>                                       5,566
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    45,019
<SALES>                                        157,366
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               157,366
<CGS>                                          156,214
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  156,214
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 8,753
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 408
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (8,009)
<INCOME-TAX>                                    (3,084)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (4,925)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (4,925)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .99
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .99


</TABLE>
#### 10 Ellicott Square Court Corporation, Appellant, v Dun & Bradstreet, Inc., Respondent.

Order unanimously reversed on the law with costs, motion denied and complaint reinstated. Memorandum: Defendant is a Delaware corporation, licensed and doing business in the State of New York. Plaintiff’s service of process on defendant’s registered agent in Delaware was sufficient to confer personal jurisdiction over defendant in this State *(see,*CPLR 311 [1]; 313; *Shepard v Morning Pride Mfg.,*138 AD2d 74, 76; *see also,*CPLR 318; *Public Adm’r of County of N. Y. v Royal Bank,*19 NY2d 127, 130; *Decisionware, Inc. v Systems Equip. Lessors,*45 AD2d 971; McLaughlin, Practice Commentaries, McKinney’s Cons Laws of NY, Book 7B, CPLR C313:l, at 427). (Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Erie County, Doyle, J.—Dismiss Complaint.) Present—Denman, J. P., Green, Balio, Lowery and Davis, JJ.
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT IRA BERNARD PARKER, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D17-3147 ) STATE OF FLORIDA, ) ) Appellee. ) ) Opinion filed March 7, 2018. Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Pasco County; Susan G. Barthle, Judge. Ira Bernard Parker, pro se.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

CASANUEVA, CRENSHAW, and SALARIO, JJ., Concur.
<TABLE>

                                                                    Exhibit 11.1

                     SPECTRIAN CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
                   COMPUTATION OF NET INCOME (LOSS) PER SHARE
                      (In thousands, except per share data)
<CAPTION>

                                                           Years ended March 31,
                                                        1997       1996      1995
                                                      -------    -------   -------
<S>                                                   <C>        <C>       <C>    
Net income (loss)                                     $(3,991)   $ 5,480   $ 5,473
                                                      =======    =======   =======
Weighted average number of shares outstanding
used in computation:
  Common stock                                          8,152      7,702     4,679
  Preferred stock                                        --         --       1,469
  Common stock equivalents as a result of
   stock options outstanding (1)                         --          491     1,147
Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 83 - stock options         --         --          58
Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 83 - preferred shares      --         --          82
                                                      -------    -------   -------

Shares use in computing per share amounts               8,152      8,193     7,435
                                                      =======    =======   =======

Net income (loss) per share                           $ (0.49)   $  0.67   $  0.74

<FN>
(1) The modified treasury stock method was used when shares obtainable  exceeded
20% of the aggregate of Common and Preferred Stock outstanding at the end of the
period.  The assumed reduced interest expense  resulting from the application of
this method is immaterial.
</FN>
</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1



Certification of Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)



In connection with the
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2013 (the “Report”) of GSV Capital Corp. (the “Registrant”),
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Michael T. Moe, the Chief Executive Officer of the
Registrant, hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge, that:



(1) The Report fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and



(2) The information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.



| |       |  | /s/ Michael T. Moe
| | ----- |  | ------------------
| | Name: |  | Michael T. Moe    
| | Date: |  | May 9, 2013
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

The Board of Directors and Stockholders
Spectrian Corporation:

We consent to incorporation  by reference in the  registration  statements (Nos.
333-38561,  333-25435,  333-49081,  and  333-53079)  on  Form  S-8 of  Spectrian
Corporation  of our report  dated April 22, 1998,  relating to the  consolidated
balance sheets of Spectrian  Corporation  and  subsidiaries as of March 31, 1998
and 1997, and the related consolidated  statements of operations,  stockholders'
equity,  and cash  flows for each of the years in the  three-year  period  ended
March 31, 1998, and the related schedule,  which report appears in the March 31,
1998, annual report on Form 10-K of Spectrian Corporation.

                                   /s/ KPMG Peat Marwick LLP

Mountain View, California
May 19, 1998
I

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 4146

To amend the Federal Deposit Insurance Act to clarify provisions intended

to protect the Corporation from having bank loans or other assets diluted

by secret side agreements.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 24, 1994

Mr. MCCOLLUM (for himself, Mr. DEUTSCH, Mr. TORKILDSEN, and Mr. ROWLAND) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee

on Banking, Finance and Urban Affairs

A BILL

To amend the Federal Deposit Insurance Act to clarify provisions intended to protect the Corporation from having

bank loans or other assets diluted by secret side agreements.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. CLARIFICATION.

4 Section 11(d)(9)(A) of the Federal Deposit Insurance

5 Act (12 U.S.C. 1821(d)(9)(A)) is amended by striking

6 ‘‘any agreement which does not meet the requirements set

7 forth in section 13(e)’’ and inserting ‘‘any agreement

8 which tends to diminish or defeat the interest of the Cor-
2

•HR 4146 IH

1 poration in any asset acquired by the Corporation as secu2 rity for a loan, by purchase, or as receiver of an insured

3 depository institution, and which does not meet the re4 quirements of section 13(e).’’.

5 SEC. 2. APPLICABILITY.

6 Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the

7 amendment made by section 1 shall apply to any claim

8 pending, under judicial review, or on appeal on or after

9 October 1, 1993.

Æ
# C_2015225EN.01000301.xml

| 10.7.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 225/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.7.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 225/3

---

Notice for the attention of the data subjects to whom the restrictive measures provided for in Council Regulation (EU) 2015/735 concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in South Sudan apply

(2015/C 225/02)

The attention of data subjects is drawn to the following information in accordance with Article 12 of Regulation (EC) No 45/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council (1):

1

The legal basis for this processing operation is Council Regulation (EU) 2015/735 (2).

2

The controller of this processing operation is the Council of the European Union represented by the Director-General of DG C (Foreign Affairs, Enlargement, Civil Protection) of the General Secretariat of the Council and the department entrusted with the processing operation is Unit 1C of DG C, which can be contacted at:

| Council of the European Union |
| --- |
| General Secretariat |
| DG C 1C |
| Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175 |
| 1048 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |
| Email: sanctions@consilium.europa.eu |

Council of the European Union

General Secretariat

DG C 1C

Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175

1048 Bruxelles/Brussel

BELGIQUE/BELGIË

Email: sanctions@consilium.europa.eu

The purpose of the processing operation is the establishment and updating of the list of persons subject to restrictive measures in accordance with Regulation (EU) 2015/735.

The data subjects are the natural persons who fulfil the listing criteria as laid down in that Regulation.

The personal data collected includes data necessary for the correct identification of the person concerned, the Statement of Reasons and any other data related thereto.

The personal data collected may be shared as necessary with the European External Action Service and the Commission.

Without prejudice to restrictions provided for in Article 20(1)(a) and (d) of Regulation (EC) No 45/2001, requests for access, as well as requests for rectification or objection will be answered in accordance with section 5 of Council Decision 2004/644/EC (3).

3

Personal data will be retained for 5 years from the moment the data subject has been removed from the list of persons subject to the asset freeze or the validity of the measure has expired, or for the duration of court proceedings in the event they had been started.

Data subjects may have recourse to the European Data Protection Supervisor in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 45/2001.

---

(1)  OJ L 8, 12.1.2001, p. 1.

1

(2)  OJ L 117, 8.5.2015, p. 13.

2

(3)  OJ L 296, 21.9.2004, p. 16.

3

---
**EXHIBIT 32**

 

**STATEMENT PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350AS REQUIRED BYSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with theAnnual Report of John Deere Capital Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Kfor the year ending October 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned herebycertify that to the best of our knowledge:

 

1.          TheReport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.          Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| December 21, 2005 | */s/ R. W. Lane*      |   | Chairman and Principal Executive Officer               |
|------------------------|-----------------------|--------|--------------------------------------------------------|
|                   |                  |   |                                                   |
|                   |                  |   |                                                   |
| December 21, 2005 | */s/ Nathan J. Jones* |   | Senior Vice President and Principal Financial  Officer |

 

 

Asigned original of this written statement required by Section 906 has beenprovided to John Deere Capital Corporation and will be retained by John DeereCapital Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission orits staff upon request.

 

61

----