UNITED STATES
 SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
 Washington D.C. 20549
  FORM 10-Q/A
 Amendment No. 1
  (Mark One)
  x
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
  For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2011
   ̈
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
  For the transition period from _________________ to _________________
  Commission File No.: 333-167960
  IZEA HOLDINGS, INC.
 (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
  Nevada

37-1530765(State or other jurisdiction of

incorporation or organization)

(I.R.S. Employer

Identification No.)
  150 N. Orange Avenue
 Suite 412
 Orlando, FL 32801
 (Address of principal executive offices)
  Issuer’s telephone number:   (407) 674-6911
  Check whether the registrant filed all documents and reports required to be filed by Section 12, 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.   Yes   x  No   o
  Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).  Yes  o    No  o
  Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
  Large accelerated filter   ̈

Accelerated filter   ̈Non-accelerated filter   ̈
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
Smaller reporting company x
  Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.  Yes    o   No   x
  APPLICABLE ONLY TO CORPORATE ISSUERS
  As of August 22, 2011, there were 38,136,031 shares of our common stock outstanding.
  Transitional Small Business Disclosure Format:    Yes    ̈   No   x
  
  EXPLANATORY NOTE
  Izea Holdings, Inc. (the "Company," "we," "us" and "our") is filing this Amendment No. 1 to its Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A (the "Amended 10-Q") to amend its Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2011, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "SEC") on August 22, 2011 (the "Original 10-Q"). This Amended 10-Q is being filed to amend and restate our consolidated financial statements and related disclosures for the quarter ended June 30, 2011 as discussed in Note 10 to the accompanying restated financial statements.
  Background of the Restatement
  As noted in our Original 10-Q, our independent registered public accounting firm had not completed their SAS 100 review of the quarter ended June 30, 2011 since the Company was in the process of determining the accounting impact related to the issuance of common and preferred stock and warrants in a financing arrangement which occurred on May 24, 2011 and May 26, 2011 as further described in Note 4 to the accompanying restated financial statements (the “Financing Arrangement”). Management of the Company has completed its analysis of the Financing Arrangement and has concluded its unaudited financial statements included in the Company's Original 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2011 cannot be relied upon. We have determined the warrants issued in connection with the Financing Arrangement require a classification in liabilities as derivative warrants. In addition, we determined the units sold to the Company’s Chief Executive Officer in connection with the Financing Arrangement resulted in compensation expense.  The accounting for the financing arrangement and related derivative financial instruments are discussed further in Notes 4 and 5 to the accompanying restated financial statements, and an explanation of the errors and their impact on the Company’s financial statements is discussed in Note 10 to the accompanying restated financial statements.
  Amendments to the Original 10-Q
  For the convenience of the reader, this Amended 10-Q sets forth the Original 10-Q, as modified and superseded where necessary to reflect the restatement. The following items have been amended principally as a result of, and to reflect, the restatement:
  ·
Part I – Item 1. Financial Statements and Notes to Financial Statements
 ·
Part I - Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
 
  In accordance with applicable SEC rules, this Amended 10-Q includes certifications from our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer dated as of the date of this filing. Except for the items noted above, no other information included in the Original 10-Q is being amended by this Amended 10-Q. The Amended 10-Q continues to speak as of the date of the Original 10-Q, and we have not updated the filing to reflect events occurring subsequently to the Original 10-Q date, other than those associated with the restatement of the Company's financial statements and the furnishing of Exhibit 101. Accordingly, this Amended 10-Q should be read in conjunction with our filings made with the SEC subsequent to the filing of the Original 10-Q.
  
  QuarterlyReport on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2011
  Table of Contents
  PagePART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATIONItem 1. Financial StatementsConsolidated Balance Sheets
4Consolidated Statements of Operations
6Consolidated Statement of Stockholders’ Equity (Deficit)
7Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
8Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements :
9Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
20Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
25Item 4. Controls and Procedures
25PART II. OTHER INFORMATIONItem 6. Exhibits
26
  
  PART 1: FINANCIAL INFORMATION
  ITEM 1 – FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
   Financial StatementsConsolidated Balance Sheets as of June 30, 2011 (unaudited) and December 31, 2010
4
–
5Unaudited Consolidated Statements of Operations for three and six months ended June 30, 2011, and 2010


6Unaudited Consolidated Statement of Stockholders’ Equity (Deficit) for the six months ended June 30, 2011


7Unaudited Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010


8Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements
9
–
19
  
  IZEA Holdings, Inc.
 Consolidated Balance Sheets
  June 30,


December 31,2011


2010(unaudited)AssetsCurrent:Cash and cash equivalents

$
2,091,988


$
1,503,105Accounts receivable


389,134



391,114Other receivables


1,000



39,105Prepaid expenses and other assets


1,258,634



24,568Total current assets


3,740,756



1,957,892Property and Equipment, net


122,091



140,918Other assets:Loan costs, net of accumulated amortization of $6,957 and $5,060


1,898



3,795Security deposits


8,340



8,340Total assets

$
3,873,085


$
2,110,945
  See accompanying notes to financial statements.
  4
  IZEA Holdings, Inc.
 Consolidated Balance Sheets
  June 30,2011

(As Restated

See Note 10)


December 31,

2010(unaudited)Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity (Deficit)Current liabilities:Accounts payable

$
671,952


$
633,506Related party payable


6,128



3,358Accrued expenses


104,184



81,014Unearned revenue


1,228,956



1,097,466Current portion of notes payable


186,807



351,568Total current liabilities


2,198,027



2,166,912Notes payable, less current portion


-



10,569Deferred rent


3,950



9,220Warrant liability


1,037,419



–Total liabilities


3,239,396



2,186,701Stockholders’ equity (deficit):Series A convertible preferred stock; $.0001 par value; 2,958,786 shares authorized; 762,907 shares issued and outstanding (liquidation preference at December 31, 2010, $1,070,473)


-



76Series A-1 convertible preferred stock; $.0001 par value; 3,609,326 shares authorized; 778,307 shares issued and outstanding (liquidation preference at December 31, 2010, $2,221,992)


-



78Series A-2 convertible preferred stock; $.0001 par value; 13,099,885 shares authorized; 12,259,334 shares issued and outstanding (liquidation preference at December 31, 2010, $10,674,017)


-



1,226Series A common stock; $.0001 par value; 24,832,003 shares authorized; 504,270 shares issued and outstanding


-



50Series B nonvoting common stock; $.0001 par value; 500,000 shares authorized, issued and outstanding


-



50Series A convertible preferred stock; $.0001 par value; 240 shares authorized; 230 and 0 shares issued and outstanding


-



-Common Stock, $.0001 par value; 500,000,000 shares authorized; 37,984,516 and 0 issued and outstanding


3,798



-Additional paid-in capital


16,029,306



14,074,956Accumulated deficit


(15,399,415
)


(14,152,192
)Total stockholders’ equity (deficit)


633,689



(75,756
)Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity (deficit)

$
3,873,085


$
2,110,945
  See accompanying notes to financial statements.
  5
  IZEA Holdings, Inc.
 Consolidated Statements of Operations
 For the Three and Six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010
 (unaudited)
  Three Months Ended June 30,


Six Months Ended June 30,2011

(As Restated

See Note 10)


2010


2011

(As Restated

See Note 10)


2010Revenue

$
845,901


$
794,018


$
1,768,679


$
1,426,861Cost of sales


381,199



420,199



822,734



749,211Gross profit


464,702



373,819



945,945



677,650Operating expenses:General and administrative


1,000,517



914,677



1,933,639



1,685,909Sales and marketing


78,702



87,899



276,224



223,686Total operating expenses


1,079,219



1,002,576



2,209,863



1,909,595Loss from operations


(614,517
)


(628,757
)


(1,263,918
)


(1,231,945
)Other income (expense):Interest income


11



30



38



34Interest expense


(6,179
)


(20,693
)


(13,134
)


(51,630
)Change in fair value of warrant liability


29,791



–



29,791



–Other income (expense), net


–



185



-



(276
)Total other income (expense)


23,623



(20,478
)


16,695



(51,872
)Net loss

$
(590,894
)

$
(649,235
)

$
(1,247,223
)

$
(1,283,817
)Weighted average common shares outstanding – basic and diluted


20,976,718



645,602



10,867,323



645,602Loss per common share – basic and diluted

$
(.03
)

$
(1.01
)

$
(.12
)

$
(1.99
)
  See accompanying notes to financial statements.
  6
  IZEA Holdings, Inc.
 Consolidated Statement of Stockholders’ Equity (Deficit)
 For the Six months ended June 30, 2011
 (unaudited)
  IZEA, Inc.
  Series A

Convertible

Preferred Stock


Series A-1ConvertiblePreferred Stock


Series A-2ConvertiblePreferred Stock


Series ACommon Stock


Series B

Nonvoting

Common StockShares


Amt


Shares


Amt


Shares


Amt


Shares


Amt


Shares


AmtBalance, December 31, 2010


762,907


$
76



778,307


$
78



12,259,334


$
1,226



504,270


$
50



500,000


$
50Reverse merger and recapitalization


(762,907
)


(76
)


(778,307
)


(78
)


(12,259,334
)


(1,226
)


(504,270
)


(50
)


(500,000
)


(50
)Balance, June 30, 2011


-



-



-



-



-



-



-



-



-



-
 
 IZEA Holdings, Inc.
  Series A

Convertible

Preferred Stock


Common Stock


Additional

Paid-In


Accumulated


Total

Stockholders’ EquityShares


Amt


Shares


Amt


Capital


Deficit


(Deficit)Balance, December 31, 2010


–



–



–



–


$
14,074,956


$
(14,152,192
)

$
(75,756
)Reverse merger and recapitalization


–



–



35,000,000



3,500



(2,020
)


–



–Sale of common stock and warrants and exchange of promissory note, net of offering costs






–



2,969,694



297



573,578



–



573,875Sale of  preferred stock and warrants and exchange of promissory note, net of offering costs and beneficial conversion feature on preferred stock


230



–



–



–



1,382,388



–



1,382,388Exercise of stock options


–



–



14,822



1



404



–



405Net loss


–



–



–



–



–



(1,247,223
)


(1,247,223
)Balance, June 30, 2011 (as restated, see Note 10)


230


$
–



37,984,516


$
3,798



16,029,306


$
(15,399,415
)

$
633,689
  See accompanying notes to financial statements.
  7
  IZEA Holdings, Inc.
 Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
 (unaudited)
  Six Months Ended June 30,2011

(As Restated

See Note 10)


2010Cash flows from operating activities:Net loss

$
(1,247,223
)

$
(1,283,817
)Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used for operating activities:Depreciation and amortization


18,827



48,365Amortization of loan costs


1,897



1,897Stock-based compensation


16,000



–Loss on disposal of equipment


-



608Change in fair value of warrant liability


(29,791
)


–Cash provided by (used for):Accounts receivable


1,980



(125,359
)Other receivables


38,105



(34,086
)Prepaid expenses and other assets


(1,234,066
)


(31,486
)Accounts payable


38,446



76,993Related party payable


2,770



-Accrued expenses


23,170



45,556Unearned revenue


131,490



257,127Deferred rent


(5,270
)


-Net cash used for operating activities


(2,243,665
)


(1,039,010
)Cash flows from investing activities:Purchase of property and equipment


-



(8,464
)Security deposit


-



7,250Net cash used for investing activities


-



(1,214
)Cash flows from financing activities:Proceeds from the issuance of series A2 preferred stock


-



2,659,554Proceeds  from issuance of convertible notes payable


-



600,000Proceeds from issuance of promissory note


500,000



-Proceeds from issuance of common and preferred stock and warrants, net


2,507,473



-Proceeds from exercise of stock options


405



918Payments on notes payable


(175,330
)


(166,667
)Net cash provided by financing activities


2,832,548



3,093,805Net increase in cash and cash equivalents


588,883



2,053,581Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of year


1,503,105



515,446Cash and cash equivalents, end of year

$
2,091,988


$
2,569,027Supplemental cash flow information:Cash paid during year for interest

$
12,023


$
19,593Non-cash financing and investing activities::Series A2 Preferred Stock issued for conversion of notes payable plus accrued interest

$
-


$
1,444,800Promissory note exchanged in financing arrangement


500,000



-Warrants issued in financing arrangement


1,067,210



-
  See accompanying notes to financial statements.
  8
  IZEA Holdings, Inc.
 Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
 (unaudited)
  NOTE 1.                 SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
  Unaudited Interim Financial Information
 The accompanying consolidated balance sheet as of June 30, 2011, the consolidated statements of operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, the consolidated statement of stockholders' equity (deficit) for the six months ended June 30, 2011 and the consolidated statements of cash flows for the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010 are unaudited but include all adjustments that are, in the opinion of management, necessary for a fair presentation of our financial position at such dates and our results of operations and cash flows for the periods then ended in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“US GAAP”). The consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2010 has been derived from the audited consolidated financial statements at that date and included in our Form 8-K dated May 12, 2011. Operating results for the six months ended June 30, 2011 are not necessarily indicative of results that may be expected for the entire fiscal year. These unaudited consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included herein.
  Nature of Business and Reverse Merger and Recapitalization
 IZEA, Inc. is the leading marketplace for consumer generated advertising, connecting advertisers with content creators such as bloggers, tweeters and other consumer content creators in order to develop and distribute compelling content throughout the blogosphere and social networks. Advertisers compensate content creators to promote their products, services and websites. The Company is headquartered in Orlando, Florida, and was incorporated as PayPerPost, Inc. in the State of Florida in February 2006. Effective September 19, 2006, the Company was reorganized and incorporated in the State of Delaware. Effective November 2, 2007, the Company changed its name to IZEA, Inc.
  On May 12, 2011, IZEA, Inc. (“IZEA”) entered into a Share Exchange Agreement (the “Exchange”) with a public shell company, IZEA Holdings, Inc., formerly known as Rapid Holdings, Inc, (“IZEA Holdings”).  IZEA’s shareholders transferred all of their issued and outstanding common and preferred shares of IZEA in exchange for shares of common stock of IZEA Holdings as more fully described in Note 3. Such Exchange caused IZEA to become a wholly-owned subsidiary of IZEA Holdings and IZEA shareholders became the majority shareholders of IZEA Holdings. The Exchange is being accounted for as a reverse-merger and recapitalization and IZEA is considered the accounting acquirer for accounting purposes and IZEA Holdings the acquired company.  The business of IZEA became the business of IZEA Holdings. Consequently, the assets and liabilities and the operations reflected in the historical financial statements prior to the Exchange are those of IZEA and are recorded at the historical cost basis of IZEA.
  Principles of Consolidation
 The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the IZEA Holdings Inc as of the date of the reverse merger, and its wholly owned subsidiary, IZEA, Inc (collectively, the “Company”).  All significant intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.
  Going Concern and Management’s Plans
 The Company has incurred significant losses from operations since inception and has an accumulated deficit of $15,399,415 as of June 30, 2011.  The Company’s financial statements have been prepared on the basis that it is a going concern, which contemplates the realization of assets and the satisfaction of liabilities in the normal course of business. The Company’s continuation as a going concern is dependent upon attaining profitable operations through achieving revenue growth targets while maintaining current fixed expense levels. The Company initiated cost reductions during 2010 and plans to maintain these cost improvements through recent headcount and overhead cost reductions. However, it will have additional expenses related to now being a public company. As a result of the approximately $3.0 million of net proceeds received from the sale of stock units (see Note 4) , the Company believes it will have sufficient cash to satisfy the Company’s projected working capital and capital expenditure needs, and debt obligations through June 30, 2012. However, if cash provided by operations is not sufficient, management plans to obtain additional debt or equity financing.  There are no assurances that the Company will be successful in meeting its cash flow requirements, however, management is confident that, if necessary, there are alternatives available to fund operations and meet cash requirements through June 30, 2012.
  9
 IZEA Holdings, Inc.
 Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
 (unaudited)
  Cash and Cash Equivalents and Concentration
 For purposes of the statement of cash flows, the Company considers all highly liquid debt instruments purchased with a maturity of three months or less to be cash equivalents.
  Cash and cash equivalents are maintained at financial institutions and, at times, balances may exceed federally insured limits. The Company has never experienced any losses related to these balances. All non-interest bearing cash balances were fully insured at June 30, 2011 due to a temporary federal program in effect from December 31, 2010 through December 31, 2012. Under the program, there is no limit to the amount of insurance for eligible accounts. Beginning 2013, insurance coverage will revert to $250,000 per depositor at each financial institution, and the Company's non-interest bearing cash balances may again exceed federally insured limits. Interest-bearing amounts on deposit in excess of federally insured limits at June 30, 2011 approximated $1,500,000.
  Accounts Receivable and Concentration of Credit Risk
 Accounts receivable are customer obligations due under normal trade terms. Uncollectability of accounts receivable is not significant since most customers are not bound by contract and are required to fund the Company for all the costs of an “opportunity”, defined as an order created by an advertiser for a blogger to write about the advertiser’s product. If a portion of the account balance is deemed uncollectible, the Company will either write-off the amount owed or provide a reserve based on the uncollectible portion of the account. Management determines the collectability of accounts by regularly evaluating individual customer receivables and considering a customer’s financial condition, credit history and current economic conditions. The Company has not recorded a reserve for doubtful accounts at December 31, 2010 and June 30, 2011.
  Concentrations of credit risk with respect to accounts receivable are limited because a large number of geographically diverse customers make up the Company’s customer base, thus spreading the trade credit risk. The Company also controls credit risk through credit approvals, credit limits and monitoring procedures. The Company performs credit evaluations of its customers but generally does not require collateral to support accounts receivable. At June 30, 2011, two customers, each of who accounted for more than 10% of the Company’s accounts receivable, accounted for 31% of total accounts receivable in aggregate.
  Property and Equipment
 Depreciation and amortization is computed using the straight-line method and half-year convention over the estimated useful lives of the assets as follows:
  Equipment

3 yearsFurniture and fixtures

10 yearsSoftware

3 yearsLeasehold improvements

3 years
  Major additions and improvements are capitalized, while replacements, maintenance and repairs, which do not improve or extend the life of the respective assets, are expensed as incurred. When assets are retired or otherwise disposed of, related costs and accumulated depreciation and amortization are removed and any gain or loss is reported as other income or expense. Depreciation and amortization expense for the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010 was $18,827 and $48,365, respectively.
  10
 IZEA Holdings, Inc.
 Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
 (unaudited)
  Impairment of Long-Lived Assets
 The Company reviews its long-lived assets for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. Recoverability of assets to be held and used is measured by a comparison of the carrying amount of an asset to future undiscounted cash flows expected to be generated by the asset. If such assets are considered to be impaired, the impairment to be recognized is measured by the amount by which the carrying amounts of the assets exceed the fair value of the assets.
  Revenue Recognition
 Revenue consists of content creator fees, service fees to establish and maintain advertiser accounts, and listing fees associated with advertiser “opportunities”. Revenue is recognized when opportunities are posted on the Company’s websites and when related payments are made to the content creators after their content has been listed for the requisite period. Customers prepay for the Company’s services, which are recorded as unearned revenue. The Company recognizes revenue in accordance with Accounting Standards Codification on Principal Agent Considerations. The Company records its revenue on the gross amount earned since the Company generally is the primary obligor in the arrangement, establishes the pricing and determines the service specifications.
  Advertising Costs
 Advertising costs are charged to expense as they are incurred, including payments to contact creators to promote the Company.  Advertising expense charged to operations for the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010 was approximately $270,298 and $223,665, respectively, and are included in sales and marketing expense in the accompanying statements of operations.
  Deferred Rent
 The Company’s operating lease for its office facilities contains predetermined fixed increases of the base rental rate during the lease term which is being recognized as rental expense on a straight-line basis over the lease term. The Company records the difference between the amounts charged to operations and amounts payable under the lease as deferred rent in the accompanying balance sheets.
  Income Taxes
 The Company has not recorded current income tax expense due to the generation of net operating losses. Deferred income taxes are accounted for using the balance sheet approach which requires recognition of deferred tax assets and liabilities for the expected future consequences of temporary differences between the financial reporting basis and the tax basis of assets and liabilities. A valuation allowance is provided when it is more likely than not that a deferred tax asset will not be realized.
  The Company identifies and evaluates uncertain tax positions, if any, and recognizes the impact of uncertain tax positions for which there is a less than more-likely-than-not probability of the position being upheld when reviewed by the relevant taxing authority. Such positions are deemed to be unrecognized tax benefits and a corresponding liability is established on the statement of financial position. The Company has not recognized a liability for uncertain tax positions. If there were an unrecognized tax benefit, the Company would recognize interest accrued related to unrecognized tax benefits in interest expense and penalties in operating expenses. The Company’s remaining open tax years subject to examination by the Internal Revenue Service include the years ended December 31, 2007 through 2010.
  Preferred Stock
 The Company accounts for its preferred stock under the provisions of Accounting Standards Codification on DistinguishingLiabilities from Equity, which sets forth the standards for how an issuer classifies and measures certain financial instruments with characteristics of both liabilities and equity. This standard requires an issuer to classify a financial instrument that is within the scope of the standard as a liability if such financial instrument embodies an unconditional obligation to redeem the instrument at a specified date and/or upon an event certain to occur. The Company has determined that its preferred stock does not meet the criteria requiring liability classification as its obligation to redeem these instruments is not based on an event certain to occur. Future changes in the certainty of the Company’s obligation to redeem these instruments could result in a change in classification.
  11
 IZEA Holdings, Inc.
 Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
 (unaudited)
  Derivative Financial Instruments
 The Company accounts for derivative instruments in accordance with FASB ASC 815, Derivatives and Hedging (“ASC 815”), which requires additional disclosures about the Company’s objectives and strategies for using derivative instruments, how the derivative instruments and related hedged items are accounted for, and how the derivative instruments and related hedging items affect the financial statements. The Company does not use derivative instruments to hedge exposures to cash flow, market or foreign currency risk. Terms of convertible debt and equity instruments are reviewed to determine whether or not they contain embedded derivative instruments that are required under ASC 815 to be accounted for separately from the host contract, and recorded on the balance sheet at fair value. The fair value of derivative liabilities, if any, is required to be revalued at each reporting date, with corresponding changes in fair value recorded in current period operating results. Pursuant to ASC 815, an evaluation of specifically identified conditions is made to determine whether the fair value of warrants issued is required to be classified as equity or as a derivative liability.
  Beneficial Conversion and Warrant Valuation
 The Company records a beneficial conversion feature (“BCF”) related to the issuance of convertible debt and equity instruments that have conversion features at fixed rates that are in-the-money when issued, and the fair value of warrants issued in connection with those instruments. The BCF for the convertible instruments is recognized and measured by allocating a portion of the proceeds to warrants, based on their relative fair value, and as a reduction to the carrying amount of the convertible instrument equal to the intrinsic value of the conversion feature. The discounts recorded in connection with the BCF and warrant valuation are recognized a) for convertible debt as interest expense over the term of the debt, using the effective interest method or b) for preferred stock as dividends at the time the stock first becomes convertible.
  Fair Value of Financial Instruments
 The Company’s financial instruments are recorded at fair value. Fair value is defined as the exchange price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date. There are three levels of inputs that may be used to measure fair value:
  ·
Level 1–Valuation based on quoted market prices in active markets for identical assets and liabilities.
  ·
Level 2–Valuation based on quoted market prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets.
  ·
Level 3–Valuation based on unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity, therefore requiring management’s best estimate of what market participants would use as fair value.
  Fair value estimates discussed herein are based upon certain market assumptions and pertinent information available to management as of June 30, 2011. The Company uses the market approach to measure fair value of its Level 1 financial assets, which include cash equivalents of $1,163,062 and $1,741,476 at December 31, 2010 and June 30, 2011, respectively. The market approach uses prices and other relevant information generated by market transactions involving identical or comparable assets or liabilities.
  The Company does not have any Level 2 financial assets or liabilities.The Company’s Level 3 financial liabilities measured at fair value consisted of the warrant liability as of June 30, 2011 (see Note 5).
  The respective carrying value of certain on-balance-sheet financial instruments approximated their fair values due to the short-term nature of these instruments. These financial instruments include cash, accounts receivable, other receivables, accounts payable, related party payable and accrued expenses. The fair value of the Company’s notes payable approximate their carrying value based upon current rates available to the Company.
  12
 IZEA Holdings, Inc.
 Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
 (unaudited)
  Stock-Based Compensation
 Stock-based compensation cost related to stock options granted under the 2011 Equity Incentive Plan (the “Plan” – see Note 6) is measured at grant date, based on the fair value of the award, and is recognized as an expense over the employee’s requisite service period.  The Company estimates the fair value of each option award issued under the Plan on the date of grant using a Black-Scholes option-pricing model that uses the assumptions noted in the table below. The Company estimates the volatility of its common stock at the date of grant based on the volatility of comparable peer companies which are publicly traded. The Company determines the expected life based on historical experience with similar awards, giving consideration to the contractual terms, vesting schedules and post-vesting forfeitures. The Company uses the risk-free interest rate on the implied yield currently available on U.S. Treasury issues with an equivalent remaining term approximately equal to the expected life of the award. The Company has never paid any cash dividends on its common stock and does not anticipate paying any cash dividends in the foreseeable future. In addition, the Company separates the grants into homogeneous groups and analyzes the assumptions for each group.  The Company used the following assumptions for options granted during the six months ended June 30, 2011:
  Six months ended June 30,
2011
2010Expected term (in years)
6.59
5.0Weighted average volatility
54.91%
59.6%Risk free rate
3.21%
2.65%Expected dividends
0
0
  The Company estimates forfeitures when recognizing compensation expense and this estimate of forfeitures is adjusted over the requisite service period based on the extent to which actual forfeitures differ, or are expected to differ, from such estimates.  Changes in estimated forfeitures are recognized through a cumulative catch-up adjustment, which is recognized in the period of change, and also impact the amount of unamortized compensation expense to be recognized in future periods.  Current expected forfeiture rates ranged from 16.22% to 47.69% and the weighted average forfeiture rate was 18.67% and 48.0% during the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively.
  Use of Estimates
 The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
  Recent Accounting Pronouncements
 There are several new accounting pronouncements issued by the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") which are not yet effective.  Management does not believe any of these accounting pronouncements will be applicable and therefore will not have a material impact on the Company's financial position or operating results.
  NOTE 2.     NOTES PAYABLE
  Note Payable – Bank
 On July 15, 2008, IZEA entered into a $1,000,000 Loan and Security Agreement (“Note Payable”) with Silicon Valley Bank, with an interest rate of 8% per annum, payable monthly.  Interest only was payable through December 31, 2008.  Repayment of principal is due in thirty-six consecutive equal monthly installments beginning in January 2009, or approximately $333,333 per year through December 31, 2011. The Note Payable is secured by all assets of IZEA. The principal balance outstanding on the note payable was $333,333 and $166,667 at December 31, 2010 and June 30, 2011, respectively.
  13
 IZEA Holdings, Inc.
 Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
 (unaudited)
  In conjunction with the issuance of the Note Payable, IZEA also issued initial warrants to purchase 2,216 shares of common stock (as amended in connection with reverse merger transaction – see Note 3), immediately exercisable, at an exercise price of $0.2039 (as adjusted) per share. Per the terms of the Note Payable, IZEA also issued 1,108 (as adjusted) additional warrants, containing similar terms as the initial warrants, for a total of 3,324 (as adjusted) warrants issued under the Note Payable. As the result of the exchange discussed in Note 3, these warrants were assumed by the Company. The fair value associated with the warrants was not recorded since the amount was insignificant to the financial statements. The warrants expire on July 15, 2015 and automatically convert to common stock on this date if the fair market value of the Company’s common stock is greater than the warrant exercise price.
  Capital Lease
 During 2010, IZEA entered into a capital lease for equipment which expires in June 2012. The balance outstanding under this lease was $20,140 at June 30, 2011, which is included in current portion of notes payable on the accompanying balance sheet.
  NOTE 3.    STOCKHOLDER’S EQUITY
  Pre-Reverse Merger Transactions
 On September 21, 2006, IZEA issued 762,907 shares of Series A Preferred Stock with a par value of $0.0001 for $3,000,000 less issuance costs of $23,000. Series A Preferred stockholders were entitled to a preferential dividend, which accrued and accumulated on such shares on an annual basis at a rate of $.0236 per share subject to adjustment in accordance with certain anti-dilution provisions. Such dividends accrued from day to day whether or not they have been declared or whether or not there were funds legally available to the Company for payment. At December 31, 2010, dividends of $770,498 had accrued but had not been declared, therefore, no provision for the Series A Preferred Stock dividends was included in these financial statements.
  During 2007, IZEA issued a total of 778,307 shares of Series B Preferred Stock with a par value of $0.0001 for $7,025,000, less issuance costs of $72,612. On May 10, 2010, IZEA renamed its Series B Preferred Stock to Series A-1 Preferred Stock. All rights and preferences under the renamed Series A-1 Preferred Stock remained the same.  Series A-1 Preferred stockholders were entitled to a preferential dividend, which accrued and accumulated on such shares on an annual basis at a rate of $.05415 per share subject to adjustment in accordance with certain anti-dilution provisions.  Such dividends accrued whether or not they have been declared or whether or not there were funds legally available to IZEA, Inc. for payment.  At December 31, 2010, dividends of $1,519,493 had accrued but had not been declared, therefore, no provision for Series A-1 Preferred Stock dividends was included in these financial statements.
  On May 10, 2010, IZEA issued a total of 7,537,771 shares of Series A-2 Preferred Stock with a par value of $0.0001 for consideration of $2,713,600 less issuance costs of $54,046. Series A-2 Preferred stockholders are entitled to a preferential dividend, which accrued and accumulated on such shares on an annual basis at a rate of $.80 subject to adjustment in accordance with certain anti-dilution provisions on such shares of Series A-2 Preferred Stock. Such dividends accrued whether or not they have been declared or whether or not there were funds legally available to IZEA for payment.  At December 31, 2010 dividends of $9,807,467 had accrued but had not been declared, therefore, no provision for the Series A-2 Preferred stock dividends has been included in these financial statements.
  14
 IZEA Holdings, Inc.
 Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
 (unaudited)
  On May 10, 2010, IZEA’s board of directors declared a ten-for-one (10:1) reverse stock split on the shares of IZEA’s common and preferred stock, increased the number of authorized shares of common and preferred stock, renamed the Series B Preferred Stock to Series A-1 Preferred Stock and created a new Series A-2 Preferred Stock. The preferred stock shares included herein were adjusted for the 10:1 reverse stock split.
  On May 6, 2011, all of the Series A preferred stockholders and certain of the Series A-1 and A-2 preferred stockholders transferred their shares, along with all their rights and preferences, to IZEA, Inc.’s CEO and CFO for an aggregate price of $1 each. The total shares purchased by management of IZEA were 762,907 Series A Preferred Shares, 766,047 Series A-1 Preferred Shares and 12,217,669 Series A-2 Preferred Shares.
  In May 2011, prior to the reverse merger transaction discussed below, all remaining outstanding shares of Series A, A-1 and A-2 Preferred Stock were converted into IZEA common stock in contemplation of the exchange of these shares for common shares of IZEA Holdings common stock.
  Reverse MergerTransaction
 On May 12, 2011, IZEA and its shareholders entered into a Share Exchange Agreement (the “Exchange Agreement”) with IZEA Holdings, Inc., formerly known as Rapid Holdings, Inc., a publicly traded shell company incorporated as a Nevada Corporation on March 22, 2010.  At the closing of the exchange, each share of IZEA’s Series A, A-1 and A-2 preferred stock and Series A and Series B common stock issued and outstanding immediately prior to the closing of the exchange was exchanged for the right to receive shares of common stock of IZEA Holdings. Accordingly, an aggregate of 22,500,000 shares of IZEA Holdings common stock were issued to the IZEA shareholders. Additionally, immediately prior to the exchange, IZEA had outstanding options to purchase an aggregate of 3,712,365 shares of common stock and an outstanding warrant to purchase 3,324 shares of Series A-1 common stock (See Note 2). Upon the closing of the exchange, the Company cancelled the options of IZEA and authorized the issuance of the same number of options to these option-holders pursuant to its newly created 2011 Equity Incentive Plan (see Note 6). Furthermore, upon closing of the exchange, the Company assumed the outstanding warrants of IZEA.
  Immediately following the closing of the exchange, under an Agreement of Conveyance, Transfer and Assignment of Assets and Assumption of Obligations, IZEA Holdings transferred all of its pre-exchange assets and liabilities to a wholly-owned subsidiary, RTL Holdings, Inc. (“SplitCo”) and thereafter, pursuant to a stock purchase agreement, transferred all of the outstanding capital stock of SplitCo to a former officer and director of IZEA Holdings, in exchange for the cancellation of shares of the IZEA Holdings common stock he owned. There were 12,500,000 shares of common stock held by persons who acquired such shares in purchases from stockholders of IZEA Holdings prior to the exchange that remained outstanding. Following the closing of the exchange and the cancellation of shares in the Split-Off, there were 35,000,000 shares of common stock issued and outstanding. Approximately 64.29% of such issued and outstanding shares were held by the IZEA shareholders.
  Authorization of Convertible Preferred Stock
 In May 2011, the Board of Directors designated 240 shares of its Preferred Stock as Series A Preferred Stock.  Each share of Series A Preferred Stock is convertible into 30,303 shares of common stock at the option of the preferred holder.
  NOTE 4.    FINANCING ARRANGEMENT
  On May 24, 2011 and May 26, 2011 the Company entered into Subscription Agreements (the “Agreements”) with certain investors (the “Investors”) whereby it sold an aggregate of 328 units (the “Units”) at a purchase price of $10,000 per Unit (the “Offering”) for an aggregate purchase price of $3,280,000. Of the gross proceeds received, (i) $500,000 was received on May 11, 2011 under a promissory note that was contractually exchangeable into 50 Units under the Offering, and (ii) $50,000 was received for the purchase of 5 Units from the Company’s Chief Executive Officer. Each Unit consisted of either (i) 30,303 shares of the Company’s common stock or (ii) one share of the Company’s recently designated Series A Preferred Stock, which is convertible into 30,303 shares of Common Stock (See Note 3), plus a five-year warrant to purchase 18,182 shares of Common Stock for $9,091 or $0.50 per linked Common Share (the “Warrants”).
  15
 IZEA Holdings, Inc.
 Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
 (unaudited)
  As a result of the Offering, Investors who purchased 230 Units elected to receive preferred stock and Investors who purchased 98 Units elected to receive Common Stock. Accordingly, the Company issued (i) 2,969,694 shares of Common Stock, (ii) 230 shares of Series A Preferred Stock, which are linked by conversion to 6,969,690 shares of Common Stock, and (iii) 328 Warrant Contracts that are linked by exercise to an aggregate of 5,963,696 shares of Common Stock.
  Direct expenses associated with the Offering amounted to $290,127 and included (i) placement agent, legal and other fees for cash of $272,527, and (ii) a warrant to the placement agent to purchase 100,000 shares of Common Stock under the same terms and conditions as the Warrants, which had a fair value of $17,600. Accordingly, net cash proceeds from the Offering amounted to $3,007,473.
  The Company has entered into registration rights agreements (the “Registration Rights Agreements”) with the Investors, pursuant to which the Company has agreed to file a “resale” registration statement with the SEC covering all shares of the Common Stock sold in the Offering and underlying any Warrants, as well as Common Stock underlying the warrants issued to the placement agent(s) within six (6) months (the “Filing Date”). The Company has agreed to maintain the effectiveness of the registration statement from the effective date until all securities have been sold or are otherwise able to be sold pursuant to Rule 144. The Company has agreed to use its reasonable best efforts to have the registration statement declared effective within nine (9) months (the “Effectiveness Deadline”). The Company is obligated to pay to Investors a fee of 1% per month of the Investors’ investment, payable in cash, for every thirty (30) day period up to a maximum of 6%, (i) following the Filing Date that the registration statement has not been filed and (ii) following the Effectiveness Deadline that the registration statement has not been declared effective; provided, however, that the Company shall not be obligated to pay any such liquidated damages if the Company is unable to fulfill its registration obligations as a result of rules, regulations, positions or releases issued or actions taken by the SEC pursuant to its authority with respect to “Rule 415”, provided the Company registers at such time the maximum number of shares of common stock permissible upon consultation with the staff of the SEC and provided further that the Company shall not be obligated to pay liquidated damages at any time following the one year anniversary of the Final Closing Date (as defined in the Registration Rights Agreements). For a period of 18 months following the Final Closing Date, the Company has agreed not to file any registration statement on Form S-8 with the SEC without the approval of holders of a majority of the Shares sold in the offering.
  In applying current accounting standards to the financial instruments issued in the Offering, the Company first considered the classification of the Series A Preferred Stock under ASC 480 Distinguishing Liabilities from Equity, and the Warrants (including the warrants issued to the placement agent) under ASC 815 Derivatives and Hedging. The Series A Preferred Stock is perpetual preferred stock without redemption or dividend provisions, contingent or otherwise. Further, the Series A Preferred Stock is convertible into a fixed number of shares of Common Stock with adjustments to the conversion price solely associated with equity restructuring events such a stock splits and recapitalization. Generally redemption provisions that provide for the mandatory payment of cash to the Investor to settle the contract or certain provisions that cause the number of linked shares of Common Stock to vary result in liability classification; and, in some instances, classification outside of stockholders’ equity. There being no such provisions associated with the Series A Preferred Stock, it is classified as a component of stockholders’ equity. The Warrants and the placement agent warrants were also evaluated for purposes of classification. These financial instruments embody two features that are not consistent with the concept of stockholders’ equity. First, the exercise price of $0.50 is subject to adjustment upon the issuance of common stock or common share linked contracts at prices below the contractual exercise prices. This particular provision is in place for the first two years of the contractual term of five years. Second, the financial instruments extend a fair-value (defined as Black-Scholes) cash redemption right to the Investors in the event of certain fundamental transactions, certain of which are not within the control of the Company. This particular provision is a written put and current accounting standards provide that such provisions are not consistent with the concept of stockholders’ equity. As a result, the Warrants and the placement agent warrant require classification in liability as derivative warrants. Derivative warrants are carried both initially and subsequently at fair value with changes in fair value reflected in income (see Note 5).
  16
 IZEA Holdings, Inc.
 Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
 (unaudited)
  The second classification-related accounting consideration related to the possibility that the conversion option embedded in the Series A Preferred Stock may require classification outside of stockholders’ equity. Generally, an embedded feature in a hybrid financial instrument (such as the Series A Preferred Stock) that both meets the definition of a derivative financial instrument and is not clearly and closely related to the host contract in term of risks would require bifurcation and accounting under derivative standards. The embedded conversion option is a feature that embodies risks of equity. The Company has concluded that the Series A Preferred Stock is a contract that affords solely equity risks. Accordingly, the embedded conversion option is, in fact, clearly and closely related to the host contract and bifurcation is not required.
  Another distinction that the Company made in accounting for the Offering was to separate the Units sold to the Company’s Chief Executive Officer from the financing for purposes of determining whether the arrangement constituted any form of compensation. As mentioned in the introductory paragraph above, 5 Units were sold to the Company’s Chief Executive Officer for $50,000. Generally, under ASC 718 Compensation – Stock Compensation the amount that the fair value of financial instruments issued to an employee in excess of amounts contributed by the employee give rise to compensation expense for accounting purposes. As illustrated in the table below, compensation expense of $16,000 arose from this element of the Offering.
  The following table summarizes the components of the Offering, their fair values (which is further discussed later) and the allocation that was given effect in the Company's financial statements:
  17
 IZEA Holdings, Inc.
 Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
 (unaudited)
  Financing


Compensation


Direct Expenses


TotalCommon stock and common stock

equivalents:Common stock


2,969,694



--



--



2,969,694Common shares that are linked to

other contracts:Series A Preferred Stock


6,818,175



151,515



--



6,969,690Warrants


5,872,786



90,910



100,000



6,063,69615,660,655



242,425



100,000



16,003,080Fair value of the financial

Instruments:Common stock (1)

$
979,999


$
--


$
--


$
979,999Series A Preferred Stock (2)


2,249,998



50,000



--



2,299,998Warrants (3)


1,033,610



16,000



17,600



1,067,210$
4,263,607


$
66,000


$
17,600


$
4,347,207Allocation of the transaction

basis for accounting:Common stock

$
(666,397
)

$
--


$
92,522


$
(573,875
)Series A Preferred Stock


(825,567
)


(34,421
)


197,605



(662,383
)Derivative warrants


(1,033,610
)


(16,000
)


(17,600
)


(1,067,210
)Paid-in capital (BCF)(4)


(704,426
)


(15,579
)






(720,005
)Compensation expense


--



16,000



--



16,000$
(3,230,000
)

$
(50,000
)

$
272,527


$
(3,007,473
)Cash consideration (expense)

$
2,730,000


$
50,000


$
(272,527
)

$
2,507,473Advances on exchange


500,000



--







500,000$
3,230,000


$
50,000


$
(272,527
)

$
3,007,473
  (1)  The fair value of the Company's Common Stock was established based upon the price paid by the Investors in the Offering.
  (2)  The fair value of the Company's Series A Preferred Stock was established based upon its Common Stock Equivalent Value (“CSE”). All other features included in the Company's Series A Preferred Stock, such as the liquidation preference did not give rise to significant incremental value above the CSE Value. The Series A Preferred Stock does provide for dividends or redemptions in cash.
  (3)  The derivative warrants were valued using the Binomial Lattice Valuation Technique and gives effect to the incremental value associated with down-round financing anti-dilution protection features. See Note 5 for more information on the Company's derivative warrants and valuation methodologies.
  (4)  A Beneficial Conversion Feature (“BCF”) arises when convertible securities, such as the Series A Preferred Stock, have effective conversion prices that are lower than the fair value of the Common Stock into which they are convertible. Effective conversion prices are calculated as the allocable proceeds (or basis) over the number of linked common shares.
  18
 IZEA Holdings, Inc.
 Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
 (unaudited)
  The basis in the transactions outlined above, which represent the cash received from the Investors and the fair value of the financial instruments that were subject to compensation consideration, were allocated to the financial instruments following current accounting standards. The basis of the financing was allocated first to derivative financial instruments because those financial instruments are required under ASC 815 to be carried both initially and subsequently at their fair values. To the extent that the fair value of the derivatives exceeded the basis, the Company is required to record a charge to income for the difference. The financial instruments issued under the arrangement that required compensation consideration were recorded at their fair values and the difference between those amounts and the consideration received by the Company was recorded as stock-based compensation expense. The direct expenses are represented by a combination of the cash that the Company paid plus the fair value of the warrants that were issued.
  NOTE 5. DERIVATIVE FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
  Derivative financial instruments are defined as financial instruments or other contracts that contain a notional amount and one or more underlying (e.g. interest rate, security price or other variable), require no initial net investment and permit net settlement. Derivative financial instruments may be free-standing or embedded in other financial instruments. Further, derivative financial instruments are initially, and subsequently, measured at fair value and recorded as liabilities or, in rare instances, assets. The Company generally does not use derivative financial instruments to hedge exposures to cash-flow, market or foreign-currency risks. However, the Company has entered into the Financing Arrangement discussed in Note 4 that gave rise to derivative warrants. As required by ASC 815, these financial instruments are required to be carried as derivative liabilities, at fair value, in our financial statements.
  The following table summarizes the Company's derivative activity for the period from the date of the Financing Arrangement discussed in Note 4 to June 30, 2011:
  Linked Common

Shares


Warrant Liability AmountBeginning balance


--


$
--Issuance of derivative warrants in connection with

the financing arrangement in Note 4


6,063,696



1,067,210Exercise or expiration


--



--Change in fair value of warrant liability


--



(29,791
)Ending balance at June 30, 2011


6,063,696


$
1,037,419
  Changes in the fair value of derivative financial instruments are required to be recorded in income.
  19
 IZEA Holdings, Inc.
 Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
 (unaudited)
  The derivative warrants were valued using Binomial Lattice Option Valuation Technique (“Binomial”). Significant inputs into this technique are as follows:
  Inception Dates

May 24 and 26, 2011
June 30, 2011Fair market value of asset (1)
$0.33
$0.33Exercise price
$0.50
$0.50Term (2)
5.0 Years
4.9 YearsImplied expected life derived from Binomial (3)
4.9 Years
4.8 YearsVolatility range (4)
64.4%--95.8%
61.6%--95.0%Equivalent volatility derived from Binomial (3)
76.9%
75.7%Risk-free rate range (5)
0.11%--1.81%
0.10%--0.81%Equivalent risk-free rate derived from Binomial (3)
0.50%
0.47%
  (1)  The fair market value of the asset was determined using the price paid by the Investors in the Offering. See the paragraph below discussing how the fair market value of the asset varies in Binomial when the contract is subject to down-round financing protection.
  (2)  The term is the contractual remaining term. For purposes of Binomial, the contractual remaining term is allocated to intervals within which exercise may or may not occur.
  (3)  The implied expected life and equivalent amounts are derived from Binomial as the averages associated with all iterations that were performed.
  (4)  The Company does not have a trading market value upon which to base its forward-looking volatility. Accordingly, the Company selected peer companies that provided a reasonable basis upon which to calculate volatility for each of the intervals described in (1), above.
  (5)  The risk-free rates used in Binomial represent the yields on zero coupon US Government Securities with periods to maturity consistent with the intervals described in (1), above.
  The Warrants and placement agent warrants embody features that result in adjustment to the exercise price when the Company sells Common Stock or other Common Stock linked contracts below the $0.50 exercise price. Since anti-dilution risk is present when the trading market price is below or projected to be below the stated exercise price, a random walk Brownian motion technique was used to estimate the future market price and the probability that the stock price would be below the stated exercise price during the implied expected life of the warrant. These values were used to develop assumptions which were used as inputs in the Binomial model used to value the warrants. A stochastic process is a sequence of events or paths generated by probabilistic laws and Brownian motion is a continuous stochastic process that is widely used in financing for modeling random behavior that evolves over time. At each valuation date, the model is run using monthly steps based upon the following inputs: the current trading market price, the implied expected life of the warrants and the estimated volatility over the implied expected life. The simulation returns the mean stock price (New Price) and the probability of the stock price falling below the exercise price (SPP). These values are used as inputs into the Binomial, since it is assumed a market participant would consider changes in the Company’s market price when considering the value to assign to the anti-dilution protection.
  20
 IZEA Holdings, Inc.
 Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
 (unaudited)
  NOTE 6.     STOCK OPTIONS
  In February 2007, IZEA’s Board of Directors adopted the 2007 Equity Incentive Plan (the “2007 Plan”). The 2007 Plan allowed the Company to provide options as an incentive for employees and consultants.  On May 11, 2011, the 2007 Plan was amended to increase the number available for issuance under the 2007 Plan from 2,313,317 to 4,889,829 shares of Series A common stock. In connection with the reverse merger on May 12, 2011, IZEA canceled all of their outstanding stock options under the 2007 Plan effectively canceling the 2007 Plan. The Company simultaneously issued new options to the same employees under a new 2011 Equity Incentive Plan of IZEA Holdings, Inc. adopted on May 12, 2011. The cancellation and replacement of the stock options under the 2007 Plan are accounted for as a modification of the terms of the canceled award. There was no incremental difference required to be recorded in the financial statements since the fair value of the cancelled options exceeded the fair value of the options replaced at the date of cancellation and replacement.
  The Board of Directors determines the price to be paid for the shares, the period within which each option may be exercised, and the terms and conditions of each option. The exercise price of the incentive stock options shall be equal to 100% of the fair market value per share of the Company’s common stock on the grant date. If an individual owns stock representing more than 10% of the outstanding shares, the price of each share of an incentive stock option shall be 110% of fair market value. The exercise price for nonqualified stock options may be less than fair market value of the stock, as determined by the Board of Directors. Unless otherwise determined by the Board of Directors at the time of grant, the right to purchase shares covered by any options under the 2011 Plan shall vest over the requisite service period as follows: one-fourth of options shall vest one year from the date of grant and the remaining options shall vest monthly, in equal increments over the remaining three-year period. The term of the options is up to 10 years.
  21
 IZEA Holdings, Inc.
 Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
 (unaudited)
  A summary of option activity under the 2007 and 2011 Options Plans as of June 30, 2011 and for the six months then ended is presented below:
  2007 PlanOptions

Shares


Weighted Average

Exercise Price


Weighted Average

Remaining Life

(Years)Outstanding at December 31, 2010


69,970


$
1.1



2Granted


3,788,620



0.03Exercised


(14,822
)


0.03Forfeited


(50,803
)


0.03Canceled


(3,792,965
)


0.05Outstanding at May 12, 2011 (date Plan was canceled)


–


$
–



–2011 PlanOptions

Shares


Weighted Average

Exercise Price


Weighted Average

Remaining Life

(Years)Outstanding at December 31, 2010


–


$
–



–Granted


4,042,365



0.39



6.6Exercised


–



–



–Forfeited


–



–



–Outstanding at June 30, 2011


4,042,365


$
0.39



6.6Exercisable at June 30, 2011


1,924,991


$
0.39



6.6
  The following table contains summarized information about nonvested 2007 stock options outstanding at May 12, 2011 and nonvested 2011 stock options outstanding at June 30, 2011:
  2007 PlanShares


Weighted Average

Grant Date

Fair ValueNonvested at December 31, 2010


16,851


$
0.60Granted


3,788,620



0.03Vested


(1,895,797
)


0.01Forfeited


(50,803
)


0.03Canceled


(1,858,872
)


0.02Nonvested at May 12, 2011 (date plan was cancelled)


–


$
–2011 PlanShares


Weighted Average

Grant Date

Fair ValueNonvested at December 31, 2010


–


$
–Granted


4,042,365



0.04Vested


(1,924,991
)


0.02Forfeited


–



–Nonvested at June 30, 2011


2,117,374


$
0.05
  22
 IZEA Holdings, Inc.
 Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
 (unaudited)
  Stock-based compensation expense recognized on awards outstanding during the six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2011 was not recorded since amounts were not significant to the financial statements. Future compensation related to nonvested awards is $10,379 for the remainder of fiscal 2011, $36,444 for fiscal 2012, $22,843 for fiscal 2013, $15,822 for fiscal 2014 and $566 for fiscal 2015.
  NOTE 7.     RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
  During 2006, IZEA entered into a General Services Agreement (“GSA”) with an entity owning 100% of IZEA’s Series B common stock. The GSA consisted of the purchase of certain marketing deliverables and equipment, as well as marketing consulting services. Cash paid to this related party during the six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2011 was approximately $15,545 and $8,757 respectively. Expenses associated with the GSA were approximately $15,545 and $14,885 for the six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2011, respectively, and are included in sales and marketing expenses in the accompanying statements of operations. The contract is on a month-to-month basis until terminated by either party.
  The amount due to this related party was $3,358 and $6,128 at December 31, 2010 and June 30, 2011, respectively.
  As part of the Company’s exchange, as more fully discussed in Note 4, the Company sold an aggregate of $50,000 worth of Units which were sold to the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and an entity under the control of the Chief Executive Officer.
  NOTE 8.     LOSS PER COMMON SHARE
  Net losses were reported during the three and six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2011.  As such, the Company excluded the impact of its potential Common shares related to stock options and warrants of 4,042,365 and 6,067,220, respectively, as of June 30, 2011 in the computation of dilutive earnings per share for these periods as their effect would be anti-dilutive. Potential Common shares of 6,969,690 upon conversion of preferred stock were also excluded from diluted loss per share since they were anti-dilutive.
  23
 IZEA Holdings, Inc.
 Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
 (unaudited)
  NOTE 9.    COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
  On May 24, 2011, the Company entered into an Investors Relations Consulting Agreement to provide investor relations services for two months beginning August 1, 2011 (as amended). The Company paid $1,190,000 with proceeds from the Offering of which $595,000 is held in escrow at June 30, 2011, and will issue 500,000 shares of Common Stock.  A total of $1,190,000 related to these amounts is included in prepaid expenses and other assets on the accompanying balance sheet as of June 30, 2011.  As of June 30, 2011, the 500,000 shares of Common Stock had not yet been issued and a measurement date had not been reached.
  NOTE 10.    RESTATEMENT
  As discussed further in Notes 4 and 5, in May 2011 the Company sold Units of common and preferred stock and warrants for net proceeds of $3,007,473 and the Company determined the warrants require classification in liabilities as derivative warrants in accordance with ASC 815. Derivative warrants are carried both initially and subsequently at fair value with changes in fair value reflected in income. In addition, the Company determined the Units sold to the Company’s Chief Executive Officer resulted in compensation expense in accordance with ASC 718. The impact of the application of ASC 815 and ASC 718 on the affected line items of the Company's quarterly financial statements for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 is set forth below:
  Balance Sheet
 As of June 30, 2011
  As Previously Reported
Adjustment
As RestatedWarrant liability
$               -
$1,037,419
$1,037,419Total liabilities
2,201,977
1,037,419
3,239,396Additional paid-in capital
17,080,516
(1,051,210)
16,029,306Accumulated deficit
(15,413,206)
13,791
(15,399,415)Total stockholders’ equity
1,671,108
(1,037,419)
633,689
  Statement of Operations
 Three Months Ended June 30, 2011
  As Previously Reported
Adjustment
As RestatedGeneral and administrative expenses
$984,517
$16,000
$1,000,517Total operating expenses
1,063,219
16,000
1,079,219Loss from operations
(598,517)
16,000
(614,517)Change in fair value of warranty liability
-
29,791
29,791Total other income (expense)
(6,168)
29,791
23,623Net loss
(604,685)
13,791
(590,894)
  Statement of Operations
 Six Months Ended June 30, 2011
  As Previously Reported
Adjustment
As RestatedGeneral and administrative expenses
1,917,639
$16,000
1,933,639Total operating expenses
2,193,863
16,000
2,209,863Loss from operations
(1,247,918)
16,000
(1,263,918)Change in fair value of warranty liability
-
29,791
29,791Total other income (expense)
(13,096)
29,791
16,695Net loss
(1,261,014)
13,791
(1,247,223)
  24
  ITEM 2 – MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS.
  General
  The following discussion and analysis is provided to increase the understanding of, and should be read in conjunction with, our unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements and related notes included elsewhere in this Report.  Historical results and percentage relationships among any amounts in these financial statements are not necessarily indicative of trends in operating results for any future period. This report contains “forward-looking statements”.  The statements, which are not historical facts contained in this Report, including this Management’s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operation, and notes to our unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements, particularly those that utilize terminology such as “may” “will,” “should,” “expects,” “anticipates,” “estimates,” “believes,” or “plans” or comparable terminology are forward-looking statements. Such statements are based on currently available operating, financial and competitive information, and are subject to various risks and uncertainties. Future events and our actual results may differ materially from the results reflected in these forward-looking statements. Factors that might cause such a difference include, but are not limited to, dependence on existing and future key strategic and strategic end-user customers, limited ability to establish new strategic relationships, ability to sustain and manage growth, variability of operating results, our expansion and development of new service lines, marketing and other business development initiatives, the commencement of new engagements, competition in the industry, general economic conditions, dependence on key personnel, the ability to attract, hire and retain personnel who possess the technical skills and experience necessary to meet the service requirements of our clients, the potential liability with respect to actions taken by our existing and past employees, risks associated with international sales, and other risks described herein and in our other filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
  The safe harbor for forward-looking statements provided by Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 excludes issuers of “penny stock” (as defined under Rule 3a51-1 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934). Our common stock currently falls within that definition.
  All forward-looking statements in this document are based on information currently available to us as of the date of this report, and we assume no obligation to update any forward-looking statements.  Forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause the actual results to differ materially from any future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements.
  Company History
  IZEA Holdings, Inc. (the “Company” “we” or “us”) was incorporated as a Nevada corporation on March 22, 2010 for the purpose of entering the business of making loans which are fully secured by a first lien on a customer’s automobile.  On May 11, 2011, we filed an amendment to our Articles of Incorporation in order to change our name from “Rapid Holdings, Inc.” to “IZEA Holdings, Inc.” On May 11, 2011, our board of directors declared a dividend of an additional 14.28117 shares of common stock on each share of our common stock outstanding on May 11, 2011 with a payment date of May 23, 2011.
  25
  On May 12, 2011, we entered into a Share Exchange Agreement (the “Exchange Agreement”) with IZEA, Inc., a privately held Delaware corporation (“IZEA”) and the shareholders of IZEA. Upon closing of the transaction contemplated under the Exchange Agreement, on May 12, 2011, the shareholders of IZEA transferred all of the issued and outstanding capital stock of IZEA to us in exchange for shares of our common stock. Such exchange caused IZEA to become our wholly-owned subsidiary. Immediately following the closing of the exchange, under an Agreement of Conveyance, Transfer and Assignment of Assets and Assumption of Obligations, the Company transferred all of its pre-exchange assets and liabilities to a wholly-owned subsidiary, RTL Holdings, Inc. (“SplitCo”) and thereafter, pursuant to a stock purchase agreement, transferred all of the outstanding capital stock of SplitCo to Anthony Barron, our former officer and director, in exchange for the cancellation of shares of our common stock he owned. Upon closing of the exchange, the business of IZEA became our business.
  IZEA, Inc. was incorporated in the state of Florida in February 2006 and reincorporated in the state of Delaware in September 2006.
  Company Overview
  We are a leader in social media sponsorships (SMS), a rapidly growing segment within social media that connects social media publishers with advertisers. We accomplish this through our five online marketplaces: WeReward.com, SponsoredTweets.com, SocialSpark.com, PayPerPost.comand InPostLinks.com. Our customers include a wide range of small and large businesses, including Fortune 500 companies, as well as advertising agencies. We generate our revenue through the sale of social media sponsorships to our customers.  We fulfill these sponsorships through our marketplace platforms connecting social media publishers such as bloggers, tweeters and mobile application users.
  Comparison of Three Months Ended June 30, 2011 to June 30, 2010
  Revenues
  Revenues for the three months ended June 30, 2011 increased to $845,901 from $794,018 as compared to the same period in 2010, an increase of 6%.  The increase is primarily attributable to growth of our customer base through our expanded sales force and through budget increases among existing customers in all of our product lines.
  Given the continued overall growth in online advertising, coupled with other strategic initiatives undertaken by IZEA, including the continued enhancement of our technology platform and our continued ability to acquire bloggers, tweeters, and other consumer content creators, we expect to continue to increase our advertising customer base and revenues for the foreseeable future.
  Cost of Sales and Gross Profit
  Cost of sales for the three months ended June 30, 2011 decreased to $381,199 from $420,199 as compared to the same period in 2010, a decrease of 9%.  The decrease is primarily attributable to the increased fees charged to manage advertising campaigns and inactivity fees, resulting in revenue for the three months ended June 30, 2011 of approximately $200,000.  There is no associated cost of sales for these revenue classes, resulting in the decrease in cost of sales for the three months ended June 30, 2011 compared to June 30, 2010. Cost of sales is comprised primarily of the amounts we pay to social media publishers in IZEA’s online network.  Cost of sales represented 45% of revenues for the three months ended June 30, 2011 compared to 53% of revenues for the same period in 2010.
  26
  Gross profit for the three months ended June 30, 2011 increased to $464,702 from $373,819 for the same period in 2010, an increase of 24%.  Our gross margin increased to 55% for the three months ended June 30, 2011 as compared to 47% for the same period in 2010. The gross margin increase is primarily attributable to increased fees charged to manage advertising campaigns and inactivity fees, resulting in revenue for the three months ended June 30, 2011 of approximately $200,000.
  Operating Expenses
  Operating expenses consist of general and administrative and sales and marketing expenses.  Total operating expenses for the three months ended June 30, 2011 increased to $1,079,219 from $1,002,576 for the same period in 2010, an increase of 7.6%.  The increase is primarily attributable to increased payroll and operating expenses offset by a slight decrease in sales and marketing expenses.
  General and administrative expenses consist primarily of executive, administrative, operations and product development and support compensation, facilities costs, insurance, depreciation, professional fees, investor relations fees and bad debt expense.  General and administrative expenses for the three months ended June 30, 2011 increased to $1,000,517 from $914,677 for the same period in 2010, an increase of 9.4%. The increase is primarily attributable to increased payroll and operating expenses due to increased activity in all of our platforms.
  Sales and marketing expenses consist primarily of compensation for sales and marketing and related support resources, sales commissions and trade show expenses. Sales and marketing expenses for the three months ended June 30, 2011 decreased to $78,702 from $87,899 for the same period in 2010, a decrease of 10%.   The decrease is primarily attributable to decreased marketing expenses
  Interest Expense
  Interest expense decreased to $(6,179) during the three months ended June 30, 2011 as compared to $(20,693) during the same period in the prior year as a result of principal payments made on our note payable to the bank.
  Change in Fair Value of Warrant Liability
  We recognized other income for a change in fair value of our warrant liability of $29,791 during the three months ended June 30, 2011 related to warrants issued in connection with a Financing Arrangement in May 2011 as further discussed below.
  Net Loss
  Net loss for the three months ended June 30, 2011was $(590,894) which is fairly consistent with the net loss of $(649,235) for the same period in 2010.  As discussed above, although gross profit increased over the prior quarter due to increased revenue and interest expense declined as a result of the conversion of debt in 2010, this was offset by an increase in operating expenses attributable to increased headcount and sales and marketing expenses.
  Comparison of Six Months Ended June 30, 2011 to June 30, 2010
  Revenues
  Revenues for the six months ended June 30, 2011 increased to $1,768,679 from $1,426,861 as compared to the same period in 2010, an increase of 24%.   The increase is primarily attributable to growth of our customer base through our expanded sales force and through budget increases among existing customers in all of our product lines.
  Given the continued overall growth in online advertising, coupled with other strategic initiatives undertaken by IZEA, including the continued enhancement of our technology platform and our continued ability to acquire bloggers, tweeters, and other consumer content creators, we expect to continue to increase our advertising customer base and revenues for the foreseeable future.
  27
  Cost of Sales and Gross Profit
  Cost of sales for the six months ended June 30, 2011 increased to $822,734 from $749,211 as compared to the same period in 2010, an increase of 10%.   The increase is primarily attributable to the growth in advertising campaigns requiring the purchase of appropriate levels of sponsorships from publishers. Cost of sales is comprised primarily of the amounts we pay to social media publishers in IZEA’s online network.  Cost of sales represented 47% of revenues for the six months ended June 30, 2011 compared to 53% of revenues for the same period in 2010.
  Gross profit for the six months ended June 30, 2011 increased to $945,945 from $677,650 for the same period in 2010, an increase of 40%.  Our gross margin increased to 53% for the six months ended June 30, 2011 as compared to 47% for the same period in 2010. The gross margin increase is primarily attributable to increase in fees charged to manage advertising campaigns and inactivity fees, resulting in revenue for the six months ended June 30, 2011 of approximately $350,000.
  Operating Expenses
  Operating expenses consist of general and administrative, and sales and marketing expenses.  Total operating expenses for the six months ended June 30, 2011 increased to $2,209,863 from $1,909,595 for the same period in 2010, an increase of 15.7%.  The increase is primarily attributable to increased payroll, operating expenses and increased sales and marketing expenses.
  General and administrative expenses consist primarily of executive, administrative, operations and product development and support compensation, facilities costs, insurance, depreciation, professional fees, investor relations fees and bad debt expense.  General and administrative expenses for the six months ended June 30, 2011 increased to $1,933,639 from $1,685,909 for the same period in 2010, an increase of 14.7%. The increase is primarily attributable to increased payroll and operating expenses due to increased activity in all of our platforms.
  Sales and marketing expenses consist primarily of compensation for sales and marketing and related support resources, sales commissions and trade show expenses. Sales and marketing expenses for the six months ended June 30, 2011 increased to $276,224 from $223,686 for the same period in 2010, an increase of 23%.   The increase is primarily attributable to our increased sales-force expansion focusing primarily on SocialSpark.com and SponsoredTweets.com.
  Interest Expense
  Interest expense decreased to $(13,134) during the six months ended June30, 2011 as compared to $(51,630) during the same period in the prior year as a result of the conversion of $1,444,800 of related party notes payable in May 2010 and principal payments made on our note payable to the bank .
  Change in Fair Value of Warrant Liability
  We recognized other income for a change in fair value of our warrant liability of $29,791 during the six months ended June 30, 2011 related to warrants issued in connection with a Financing Arrangement in May 2011 as further discussed below.
  28
  Net Loss
  Net loss for the six months ended June 30, 2011was $(1,247,223) which is fairly consistent with the net loss of $(1,283,817) for the same period in 2010.  As discussed above, although gross profit increased over the prior quarter due to increased revenue and interest expense declined as a result of the conversion of debt in 2010, this was offset by an increase in operating expenses attributable to increased headcount and sales and marketing expenses.
  Capital Resources and Liquidity
  Our cash position was $2,091,988 as of June 30, 2011 as compared to $1,503,105 as of December 31, 2010, an increase of $588,883.  Cash used for operating activities was $(2,243,665) during the six months ended June 30, 2011 and was primarily a result of our net loss during the period of $(1,247,223) and prepayment of future marketing and other expenses of $(1,234,066).  Cash provided by financing activities was $2,832,548 during the six months ended June 30, 2011 primarily as a result of net proceeds of $3,007,473 received from the issuance of common and preferred stock and warrants and exchange of promissory notes in a financing arrangement as further discussed below.  This was offset by scheduled principal payments of $(175,330) on our bank note payable.
  Significant losses from operations have been incurred since inception and there is an accumulated deficit of $(15,399,415) as of June 30, 2011.  Continuation as a going concern is dependent upon attaining profitable operations through achieving revenue growth targets while maintaining current fixed expense levels. Cost reductions were implemented during 2010 through headcount and overhead cost reductions. Cash provided by operations is relied upon to satisfy the Company’s projected working capital, capital expenditure needs and debt obligations through June 30, 2012.
  On May 24, 2011 and May 26, 2011, the Company entered into Subscription Agreements (the “Agreements”) with certain investors (the “Investors”) whereby it sold an aggregate of 328 units (the “Units”) at a purchase price of $10,000 per Unit (the “Offering”) for an aggregate purchase price of $3,280,000. Of the gross proceeds received, (i) $500,000 was received on May 11, 2011 under a promissory note that was contractually exchangeable into 50 Units under the Offering, and (ii) $50,000 was received for the purchase of 5 Units from the Company’s Chief Executive Officer. Each Unit consisted of either (i) 30,303 shares of the Company’s common stock or (ii) one share of the Company’s recently designated Series A Preferred Stock, which is convertible into 30,303 shares of Common Stock, plus a five-year warrant to purchase 18,182 shares of Common Stock for $9,091 or $0.50 per linked Common Share (the “Warrants”).
  As a result of the Offering, Investors who purchased 230 Units elected to receive preferred stock and Investors who purchased 98 Units elected to receive Common Stock. Accordingly, the Company issued (i) 2,969,694 shares of Common Stock, (ii) 230 shares of Series A Preferred Stock, which are linked by conversion to 6,969,690 shares of Common Stock and (iii) 328 Warrant Contracts that are linked by exercise to an aggregate of 5,963,696 shares of Common Stock.
  Direct expenses associated with the Offering amounted to $290,127 and included (i) placement agent, legal and other fees for cash of $272,527 and (ii) a warrant to the placement agent to purchase 100,000 shares of Common Stock under the same terms and conditions as the Warrants, which had a fair value of $17,600. Accordingly, net cash proceeds from the Offering amounted to $3,007,473.
  The Company has entered into registration rights agreements (the “Registration Rights Agreements”) with the Investors, pursuant to which the Company has agreed to file a “resale” registration statement with the SEC covering all shares of the Common Stock sold in the Offering and underlying any Warrants, as well as Common Stock underlying the warrants issued to the placement agent(s) within six (6) months (the “Filing Date”). The Company has agreed to maintain the effectiveness of the registration statement from the effective date until all securities have been sold or are otherwise able to be sold pursuant to Rule 144. The Company has agreed to use its reasonable best efforts to have the registration statement declared effective within nine (9) months (the “Effectiveness Deadline”). The Company is obligated to pay to Investors a fee of 1% per month of the Investors’ investment, payable in cash, for every thirty (30) day period up to a maximum of 6%, (i) following the Filing Date that the registration statement has not been filed and (ii) following the Effectiveness Deadline that the registration statement has not been declared effective; provided, however, that the Company shall not be obligated to pay any such liquidated damages if the Company is unable to fulfill its registration obligations as a result of rules, regulations, positions or releases issued or actions taken by the SEC pursuant to its authority with respect to “Rule 415”, provided the Company registers at such time the maximum number of shares of common stock permissible upon consultation with the staff of the SEC and provided further that the Company shall not be obligated to pay liquidated damages at any time following the one year anniversary of the Final Closing Date (as defined in the Agreements). For a period of 18 months following the Final Closing Date, the Company has agreed not to file any registration statement on Form S-8 with the SEC without the approval of holders of a majority of the Shares sold in the offering.
  29
  On May 24, 2011, we entered into an investor relations agreement with a consulting company to provide investor relations services for a period of two months for fees of $1,190,000 in cash and the issuance of 500,000 shares of our common stock.
  On July 15, 2008, IZEA entered into a $1,000,000 Loan and Security Agreement (“Note Payable”) with Silicon Valley Bank, with an interest rate of 8% per annum, payable monthly.  Interest only was payable through December 31, 2008.  Repayment of principal is due in thirty-six consecutive equal monthly installments beginning in January 2009, or approximately $333,333 per year through December 31, 2011. The Note Payable is secured by all assets of IZEA. The principal balance outstanding on the note payable was $250,000 at March 31, 2011 and will be repaid during fiscal 2011.
  On September 23, 2009, February 25, 2010 and April 16, 2010 IZEA entered into unsecured convertible promissory notes (“Convertible Notes”) with IZEA’s then current preferred stockholders to fund operations until alternative financing could be closed.  Proceeds under the Convertible Notes totaled $798,561, $300,000 and $300,000 respectively for a total of $1,398,561. The Convertible Notes were senior to all obligations other than the debt owed to Silicon Valley Bank, and accrued interest at the rate of 8% per annum.  In May 2010, all of the holders of the Convertible Notes converted their $1,444,800 notes payable (including accrued interest) into 4,721,563 shares of IZEA’s newly created Series A-2 Preferred Stock in connection with the sale of Series A-2 Preferred Stock.
  Off Balance Sheet Arrangements
  We do not engage in any activities involving variable interest entities or off-balance sheet arrangements.
  Critical Accounting Policies and Use of Estimates
  Accounts receivable are customer obligations due under normal trade terms and are typically considered collectible since most customers are not bound by contract and are required to fund the Company for all the costs of an “opportunity”, defined as an order created by an advertiser for a blogger to write about the advertiser’s product. If a portion of the account balance is deemed uncollectible, the Company will either write-off the amount owed or provide a reserve based on the uncollectible portion of the account. Management determines the collectibility of accounts by regularly evaluating individual customer receivables and considering a customer’s financial condition, credit history and current economic conditions. The Company has not recorded a reserve for doubtful accounts at December 31, 2010 and June 30, 2011.
  Revenue consists of content creator fees, service fees to establish and maintain advertiser accounts, and listing fees associated with advertiser “opportunities”. Revenue is recognized when opportunities are posted on the Company’s websites and when related payments are made to the content creators after their content has been listed for the requisite period. Customers prepay for the Company’s services, which are recorded as unearned revenue. The Company recognizes revenue in accordance with Accounting Standards Codification on Principal Agent Considerations. The Company records its revenue on the gross amount earned since the Company generally is the primary obligor in the arrangement, establishes the pricing and determines the service specifications.
  30
  Stock based compensation is measured at grant date, based on the fair value of the award, and is recognized as an expense over the employee’s requisite service period.  We estimate the fair value of each stock option as of the date of grant using the Black-Scholes-Merton pricing model.  Options vest ratably over four years with one-fourth of options vesting one year from the date of grant and the remaining options  vesting monthly, in equal increments over the remaining three-year period  and generally have ten-year contract lives.  The Company estimates the volatility of its common stock at the date of grant based on the volatility of comparable peer companies which are publicly traded. The Company determines the expected life based on historical experience with similar awards, giving consideration to the contractual terms, vesting schedules and post-vesting forfeitures. The Company uses the risk-free interest rate on the implied yield currently available on U.S. Treasury issues with an equivalent remaining term approximately equal to the expected life of the award. The Company has never paid any cash dividends on its common stock and does not anticipate paying any cash dividends in the foreseeable future. In addition, the Company separates the grants into homogeneous groups and analyzes the assumptions for each group.
  The Company accounts for derivative instruments in accordance with FASB ASC 815, Derivatives and Hedging, which requires additional disclosures about the Company’s objectives and strategies for using derivative instruments, how the derivative instruments and related hedged items are accounted for, and how the derivative instruments and related hedging items affect the financial statements. The Company does not use derivative instruments to hedge exposures to cash flow, market or foreign currency risk. Terms of convertible debt and equity instruments are reviewed to determine whether or not they contain embedded derivative instruments that are required under ASC 815 to be accounted for separately from the host contract, and recorded on the balance sheet at fair value. The fair value of derivative liabilities, if any, is required to be revalued at each reporting date, with corresponding changes in fair value recorded in current period operating results. Pursuant to ASC 815, an evaluation of specifically identified conditions is made to determine whether the fair value of warrants issued is required to be classified as equity or as a derivative liability.
  The Company records a beneficial conversion feature (“BCF”) related to the issuance of convertible debt and equity instruments that have conversion features at fixed rates that are in-the-money when issued, and the fair value of warrants issued in connection with those instruments. The BCF for the convertible instruments is recognized and measured by allocating a portion of the proceeds to warrants, based on their relative fair value, and as a reduction to the carrying amount of the convertible instrument equal to the intrinsic value of the conversion feature. The discounts recorded in connection with the BCF and warrant valuation are recognized a) for convertible debt as interest expense over the term of the debt, using the effective interest method or b) for preferred stock as dividends at the time the stock first becomes convertible.
  Recent Accounting Pronouncements
  There are several new accounting pronouncements issued by the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") which are not yet effective.  Management does not believe any of these accounting pronouncements will be applicable and therefore will not have a material impact on the Company's financial position or operating results.
  ITEM 3 – QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES AND MARKET RISK
  N/A
  ITEM 4 – CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
  Disclosure controls and procedures are controls and other procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we file or submit under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”) is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and forms.  Disclosure controls and procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we file under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our principal executive and financial officers, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosures.
  Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
  The Company's management, under the supervision and with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, carried out an evaluation of the effectiveness of the design and operation of the Company's disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) of the Exchange Act) as of June 30, 2011.  Based on the results of this assessment, our management concluded that our internal controls over financial reporting were not effective as of June 30, 2011 based on such criteria for the reasons discussed below.
  In the course of management's evaluation, each of our Company's CEO and CFO considered the incompletion of our assessment of the accounting impact of the issuance of complex and non-standard debt and equity instruments in May 2011 were the result of a material weakness. To address our Company's material weakness related to the accounting and disclosure for complex and non-standard debt and stockholders' equity transactions, we are in the process of enhancing our internal control processes in order to be able to comprehensively review the accounting and disclosure implications of such transactions on a timely basis.
  Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
  There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting identified in connection with the evaluation required by paragraph (d) of Rule 13a-15 or 15d-15 under the Exchange Act that occurred during the quarter ended June 30, 2011 that have materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting, except for the material weakness noted above.
  31
  PART II:  OTHER INFORMATION
  ITEM 6 – EXHIBITS
   31.1
Certification by Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of Sarbanes Oxley Act of 200231.2
Certification by Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of Sarbanes Oxley Act of 200232.1
Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 135032.2
Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350
  32
  SIGNATURES
  Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
  IZEA HOLDINGS, INC.

a Nevada corporationSeptember 9, 2011
By:
/s/ Edward MurphyEdward Murphy

President, Chief Executive Officer,

and a Director

(Principal Executive Officer)
 
  September 9, 2011
By:
/s/ Donna MackenzieDonna Mackenzie

Chief Financial Officer and Secretary

(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
 
  33