alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32 

Certification of CEO and CFO Pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

as Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Sixth Street Specialty Lending, Inc. (the “Company”) for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2020, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), Joshua Easterly as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Ian Simmonds, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to such officer’s knowledge: 

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

 

| /s/ Joshua Easterly |
|---------------------|
| Name:               |   | Joshua Easterly |
| Title:              |   | Chief Executive Officer |
| Date:               |   | November 4, 2020 |

  

| /s/ Ian Simmonds |
|------------------|
| Name:            |   | Ian Simmonds |
| Title:           |   | Chief Financial Officer |
| Date:            |   | November 4, 2020 |

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLAImages

# DLA Images

Search

Search

                                  - All Images 
                                  - Other 

                                  - Upload Date
                                  - Photo Date
                                  - Title

Share

----

Download Image: Small ()Medium ()Full Size (0.23 MB)

Tags:DLA Distribution, Defense Logistics Agency Distribution, DLA Distribution Red River, LtCol Milton Kelly. LtCol Anthony Stoeger, Hail and Fairwell, dla, Defense Logistics Agency

Photo by:VIRIN: 

Photo Gallery
----

|   | 1. | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company as of the dates and for the periods explained in the Report. |
|--------|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| /s/ Adrian Sarbu                       |   |                          | /s/ David Sach |   |
|---------------------------------------------|--------|-------------------------------|----------------|--------|
|  Adrian Sarbu                          |   | David Sach                    |
|  President and Chief Executive Officer |   | Chief Financial Officer       |
|  (Principal Executive Officer)         |   | (Principal Financial Officer) |
|  April 20, 2012                   |   | April 20, 2012                |

----
2013-Q4 Exhibit 10.13






Exhibit 10.13


Exhibit 10.13


The following current executive officers have entered into Executive Severance Agreements with the Company in the form filed herewith. The information listed below is inserted into the blanks for the respective executive officer’s Executive Severance Agreement.
	
							
	 
	 
	Salary Multiplier Rate
	 
	Termination Period
	 
	Change of Control
Continuation Period

	 
	 
	(Section 4(a)(4))
	 
	(Section 1(n))
	 
	(Section 2)

	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 

	Michael Jeppesen
	 
	2
	 
	2 years
	 
	24 months
**EXHIBIT 13.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVEOFFICER**

**PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS**

**ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

Inconnection with the Annual Report of Embotelladora Andina S.A (the “Company”)on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008, as filedwith the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),I, Jaime Garcia, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002, that:

 

(1)      The Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)      The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

 

 
| /s/ JAIME GARCIA           |   |
|----------------------------|--------|
| Jaime García          |   |
| Chief Executive Officer    |   |
| Embotelladora Andina  S.A. |   |
| Dated: June 30,  2009 |   |

 

A signed original of thiswritten statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Companyand will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities andExchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

----
Exhibit 10.24


 


Escalade, Incorporated


Schedule of Executive Officer Compensation


 


Compensation for the executive officers
of Escalade, Incorporated consists of a base salary, bonuses and long-term incentives in the form of stock option grants or restricted
stock unit grants.


 


Base Salary


In general, base salaries are set at the
beginning of each year based upon changes in the employee’s level of responsibility, individual performance reviews conducted
by the Company’s Compensation Committee and changes in the cost of living.


 


Bonuses


The Company’s Compensation Committee
has established a profit incentive plan that provides for the payment of cash bonuses if certain performance targets are achieved.
Under the plan, the Compensation Committee establishes target performance levels early in each fiscal year, subject to potential
changes that the Committee may determine appropriate. Virtually all employees are eligible to participate in the profit incentive
plan. In conjunction with the completion of the Company’s annual audited financial statements, the bonus pool is finalized
based on actual results achieved. Allocation of the bonus pool to individual executive officers is determined at the Compensation
Committee’s discretion based upon a review of the overall Company’s performance relative to budget, the Company’s
strategic position, and individual executive officer’s performance relative to budget. There are no pre-defined methods for
allocating the bonus pool to any of the Company’s executive officers.


 


Long-Term Incentives


Under the terms of the Escalade, Incorporated
2007 Incentive Plan, executive officers of the Company are eligible to receive long term incentive compensation in various forms
including stock options and restricted stock units. The Company’s Compensation Committee has full discretion over the form,
amount and timing of these grants which historically have been annual grants. In its determination of annual grants, the Compensation
Committee considers performance of both the individual and the Company.


 


Additional Benefits


Executive officers are eligible to participate
in the Company’s 401(k) retirement plan and receive Company matching contributions in accordance with the plan terms. The
Company also pays group term life insurance benefits on behalf of executive officers.
**Exhibit
      32.2**




**Certification
      Pursuant to 18 U.S.C Section 1350,**


**as
      Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
      2002**





In
      connection with the Annual Report of clickNsettle.com, Inc. (the “Company”) on
      Form 10-KSB for the year ended June 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and
      Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Form 10-KSB”), I, Patricia
      Giuliani-Rheaume, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify pursuant
      to 18
      U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
      that;





(3)
            The
                Form 10-KSB fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
                or 15(d)
                of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d));
                and





(4)
            The
                information contained in the Form 10-KSB fairly presents, in all
                material
                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
                Company.




Dated:
      September 18, 2007




/s/
      Patricia Giuliani-Rheaume


Patricia
      Giuliani-Rheaume - Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and
      Treasurer





22
##### 



Certification of the Principal Financial Officer
Pursuant to 15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)
(Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of the Company;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statement made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4.
    
    The Companys other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining
disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e))
for the Company and have:
 (a)
    
    designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the Company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made
known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which
this report is being prepared;(b)
    
    evaluated the effectiveness of the Companys disclosure controls and procedures
and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure
controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on
such evaluation; and(c)
    
    disclosed in this report any change in the Companys internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by this report that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Companys
internal control over financial reporting; and
 5.
    
    The Companys other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Companys auditors and the
audit committee of the Companys board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
 (a)
    
    all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely
affect the Companys ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; and(b)
    
    any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
who have a significant role in the Companys internal control over financial reporting.
  /s/ Mayela Rincón de Velasco
#### Kenneth Lamont ROBINSON, Appellant, v. The STATE of Oklahoma, Appellee.

No. F-86-625.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma.

Sept. 8, 1990.

ORDER

E. Alvin Schay, Appellate Public Defender, has filed a motion requesting this Court to determine whether attorneys in the Appellate Public Defender System can be court appointed for the purpose of appeals remanded to the district court for post-examination competency hearings. *See Thomas v.*State, *777*P.2d 399 (Okl.Crim. App.1989).

Having carefully considered the application, and being fully advised in the premises, we adopt the following procedure with regard to appointment of counsel on appeals remanded for post-examination competency hearings:

> 1. The district court should first consider appointing the original trial counsel when possible.

> 2. Where the original trial counsel is not available, the district court shall have the responsibility of appointing counsel other than the Appellate Public Defender’s Office.

> IT IS SO ORDERED.

/s/ Ed Parks ED PARKS, Presiding Judge

/s/ James F. Lane JAMES F. LANE, Vice Presiding Judge

/s/ Hez J. Bussey HEZ J. BUSSEY, Judge

/s/ Tom Brett TOM BRETT, Judge

/s/ Gary L. Lumpkin GARY L. LUMPKIN, Judge
Exhibit 31.2





CERTIFICATION




Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350




(Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)




I, Michelle Sibley, certify that:




1.  I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of SCG Financial Acquisition Corp.;




2.  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;




3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;




4.  The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant have:




a)       Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;




b)       [Omitted pursuant to the transition period exemption for newly public companies;]




c)       Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and




d)       Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.




5.  The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors:









a)       All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and




b)       Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.




Dated: May 20, 2011

/s/ Michelle SibleyMichelle SibleyChief Financial Officer, Treasurer and Secretary(Principal financial and accounting officer)
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Curtis Revell, Appellant.

Judgment of the Supreme Court, New York County (Martin H. Rettinger, J.), rendered May 31, 1988, which convicted defendant, after jury trial, of assault in the second degree, criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree and reckless endangerment in the first degree, and sentenced him to concurrent indeterminate terms of imprisonment of from 1 to 3 years on the assault and reckless endangerment convictions and from 2 to 6 years on the weapons’ possession conviction, unanimously affirmed.

People’s witnesses Reggie Burns and John Mason saw their friends Eric Coles, Ward Jones and Tracy Reddick arguing with defendant, Harold King and an individual known as "Jay” in a hallway of the Prince George Hotel, during the course of which defendant displayed a pistol. The argument resumed outside the hotel on 28th Street and Madison Avenue. As Reddick and Burns threw bottles at defendant and his friends, defendant fired his gun once into the air. A chase ensued, with Burns and Mason and their friends running *357north on Madison Avenue after defendant and his two companions, who entered a grey Mercury Capri. After a bottle was thrown at the vehicle by Reddick, defendant fired one shot as he drove by, striking Reddick in the leg.

Defendant was apprehended at 34th Street and Second Avenue after a chase, during which the Capri ran two traffic lights. An operable .32 caliber automatic pistol was recovered from underneath the front passenger seat. A bullet fragment, exhibiting the same general characteristics as bullets test-fired from the pistol, was recovered at the scene.

The prosecutor’s remarks on summation do not warrant reversal of the conviction. During the course of his summation, defense counsel noted that Mason and Burns had been compelled to testify, characterizing their testimony as “amazing” and suggesting that it was rehearsed. The prosecutor responded that the People’s witnesses had no motive to lie and that, had they been motivated by a desire to frame defendant, it would not have been necessary to compel their testimony. We conclude that the prosecutor’s remarks were a fair response to the argument advanced by defense counsel *(People v Sims,*162 AD2d 384, *lv denied*76 NY2d 990). Concur—Murphy, P. J., Milonas, Ellerin, Ross and Rubin, JJ.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                           3,618
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  167,502
<ALLOWANCES>                                    83,000
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               103,625
<PP&E>                                          25,441
<DEPRECIATION>                                  13,732
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 154,832
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           49,587
<BONDS>                                            339
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           158
<OTHER-SE>                                     101,403
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   154,832
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               408,520
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  379,653
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,134
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 27,589
<INCOME-TAX>                                    10,898
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             16,691
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    16,691
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.04
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.04


</TABLE>
1

David Metz

From: Hastry, Mike <Mike.Hastry@dep.state.nj.us>

Sent: Friday, October 19, 2012 3:54 PM

To: Tripp Burwell

Subject: NJ CESQG info

Attachments: NJ CESQG 2010.xls

Trip,  

Attached pls find an excel workbook.  The first sheet lists the CESQG’s we have on file and their SIC/NAICs

codes/description (if available).  The second sheet id’s the waste volumes and waste codes based on manifest data.

‘Multiples’ indicate that the company made more than one manifest shipment for 2010.  The two sheets won’t match in

number as not all our CESQG’s use a manifest nor are they required.  Anything else, just let me know ‐ thanks

Michael R. Hastry , Chief 

Bureau of Hazardous Waste & UST Compliance and Enforcement 

New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection 

Tel. No. (609) 943-4989 

Fax. No. (609) 292-3970 

 

For information on the Hazardous Waste program, click 

http://www.nj.gov/dep/enforcement/hw.html

For information on the Underground Storage Tank program, click 

http://www.nj.gov/dep/srp/bust/bust.htm

 

For information on the Medical Waste program, click 

http://www.nj.gov/dep/dshw/rrtp/rmw.htm

 

For information on no cost Compliance Assistance Seminars, click 

http://www.state.nj.us/dep/enforcement/hw_seminar.html
#### The People of the State of New York, Appellant, v Jamel Martin, Respondent.

Appeal by the People from an *565order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Calabretta, J.), dated April 6, 1989, which granted that branch of the defendant’s omnibus motion which was to suppress physical evidence.

Ordered that the order is affirmed *(see, People v Bennett,*170 AD2d 516). Mangano, P. J., Lawrence, Rosenblatt and Miller, JJ., concur.