alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of SquareTwo Financial Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March, 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), each of the undersigned officers of the Company hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to such officer’s knowledge:

 

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 
|                      | By:    | /s/    Paul   A. Larkins |
|---------------------------|--------|----------------------------------------------|
| Date:   May 12, 2011 | Name:  | Paul A. Larkins                              |
|                      | Title: | Chief   Executive Officer                    |

 

 
| Date:   May 12, 2011 |   |                                                |
|---------------------------|--------|-----------------------------------------------------|
|                      | By:    | /s/    L.   Heath Sampson       |
|                      | Name:  | L. Heath Sampson                                    |
|                      | Title: | Senior   Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |

 

----
#### UNARCO MATERIALS STORAGE, Petitioner, *v.*TEILHABER MANUFACTURING COMPANY, a Colorado corporation, Respondent.

No. 90SC32.

Supreme Court of Colorado, En Banc.

Jan. 18, 1991.

ORDER OF COURT

BY THE COURT.

Upon consideration of the Record on Appeal, together with the Written and Oral Arguments of counsel,

IT IS ORDERED that the Writ of Certio-rari be, and hereby is, DENIED as having been improvidently granted.
EXHIBIT 23.1





CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM





We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 333-48364, 333-38420, 333- 31696, 333-93117, 333-92327, 333-11294, 333-88421, 333-39553, 333-106742, 333-118776, 333-121123, 333-123738, 333- 126229, 333-148958 and 333-162535) and the Registration Statements on Form S-3 (No. 333-115059, 333-120456, 333-123567, 333-124822, 333-126347, 333-126931, 333-133403, 333-137165, 333-143385, 333-144663, 333-148974, 333-156001, 333- 159880 and 333-164053) of our report dated March 31, 2011 relating to our audits of the consolidated financial statements of Digital Angel Corporation and subsidiaries, which report includes an explanatory paragraph stating that there is substantial doubt about the company's ability to continue as a going concern and is included in the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010. We also consent to the reference to our firm as Experts in the Registration Statements on Form S-3.




/s/ EisnerAmper LLP





New York, New York




March 31, 2011
##### 



Certification of the Principal Executive Officer
Pursuant to 15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)
(Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of the Company;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statement made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4.
    
    The Companys other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining
disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e))
for the Company and have:
 (a)
    
    designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the Company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made
known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which
this report is being prepared;(b)
    
    evaluated the effectiveness of the Companys disclosure controls and procedures
and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure
controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on
such evaluation; and(c)
    
    disclosed in this report any change in the Companys internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by this report that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Companys
internal control over financial reporting; and
 5.
    
    The Companys other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Companys auditors and the
audit committee of the Companys board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
 (a)
    
    all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely
affect the Companys ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; and(b)
    
    any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
who have a significant role in the Companys internal control over financial reporting.
  /s/ Miguel Rincón
•'^A1 / ; /OW 

'' JCKET 

-. r I i UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION § 

ADMINISTRATION, § 

Complainant, § ^^> 

vs. § FAA Docket No. CP09SW0004 

§ DMS No. FAA-2009-0735 . 

Roslyne Marie Elder § •^'° " ^^^ 

Respondent, § 

COMPLAINANT'S NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AS COUNSEL 

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE THAT Yolanda Ayala Bernal, Federal Aviation Administration 

(FAA), Southwest Region, 2601 Meacham Blvd., Fort Wortin, Texas, 76137 enters iner 

appearance as counsel on behalf of the FAA. 

Respectfully submitted. 

LYNETTE WORD 

Regional Counsel 

Southwest Region 

By: 

Yolanda Ayal^ Bernal 

Attorney 

(817)222-5070 

FAX (817) 222-5945 

Dated: May 26, 2010 
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I hereby certify that on this date the original and a copy of Complainant's Notice 

of Appearance as Counsel were sent by Federal Express mail, to: 

Federal Aviation Administration 

600 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Wilbur Wright Building - Room 2W1000 

Washington, DC 20591 

Att:: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

I hereby certify that a copy of this Complainant's Notice of Appearance as 

Counsel was sent this date by Federal Express Mail to: 

The Honorable Isaac D. Benkin 

Administrative Law Judge 

Office of Hearings, M-20 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. 

East Building Ground Floor, Room El2-320 

Washington, DC 20590 

Ms. Roslyne Marie Elder 

835 Sierra Vista Drive, Apt 326 

LasN^gas, NV 89169 

G. Gay Whittirigton-Hopkins , Management Program Analyst 

Federal Aviation Administration 

Fort Worth, Texas 76137 

Dated: May 26, 2010
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Denali Commission","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.denali.gov","author_name":"denaliadmin","author_url":"https:\/\/www.denali.gov\/author\/denaliadmin\/","title":"FUNDING ASSISTANCE FOR REGIONAL SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT PLANNING","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"WkxGxI7gel\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.denali.gov\/funding-assistance-for-regional-solid-waste-management-planning\/\">FUNDING ASSISTANCE FOR REGIONAL SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT PLANNING<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.denali.gov\/funding-assistance-for-regional-solid-waste-management-planning\/embed\/#?secret=WkxGxI7gel\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“FUNDING ASSISTANCE FOR REGIONAL SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT PLANNING” — Denali Commission\" data-secret=\"WkxGxI7gel\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.denali.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/09\/cropped-low-res-from-web-150x150-1.png","thumbnail_width":150,"thumbnail_height":150}
EXHIBIT 15

                             IRURITA ABOGADOS, S.C.

                      CAMINO AL AJUSCO NO. 130 DESPACHO 203
                 COL. JARDINES EN LA MONTANA, 14210 MEXICO, D.F.
                          TEL: 5631-5190 FAX: 5632-4468

                                                          June 23, 2004

Grupo Elektra, S.A. de C.V.
Avenida Insurgentes Sur 3579
Col. Tlalpan la Joya
14000 Mexico, D.F.

Dear Sirs:

      We have acted as special Mexican counsel to you, Grupo Elektra, S.A. de
C.V. (the "Company"), a limited liability corporation with variable capital
(sociedad anonima de capital variable) organized and existing under the laws of
the United Mexican States in connection with the reportable related-party
transactions under Item 7.B.2 of Form 20-F.

      This opinion is given to you pursuant to Item 7.B.3 of Form 20-F.

      Banco Azteca, S.A., Institucion de Banca Multiple, subsidiary of the
Company ("Banco Azteca"), is duly organized and validly existing and holds the
proper authorization to operate as a credit institution (institucion de banca
multiple), organized and existing under the laws of the United Mexican States.
Pursuant to the foregoing, Banco Azteca is subject to the Mexican banking laws,
rules and regulations, specially the Credit Institutions Law (Ley de
Instituciones de Credito) ("LIC"). There also, Banco Azteca is under the
supervision of the Ministry of Finance and Public Credit (Secretaria de Hacienda
y Credito Publico) as well as the National Banking and Securities Commission
(Comision Nacional Bancaria y de Valores) ("CNBV").

      In connection with the foregoing, we have reviewed the laws, rules and
regulations that we have deemed appropriate, and in this regard, section 117 of
the LIC prohibits credit institutions to disclose information on the deposits,
services or any other type of operations to any other person than the
corresponding depositor, creditor, holder or beneficiary or its legal
representatives, as well as any Mexican judicial authority as a result of a
subpoena and to tax authorities by request of the CNBV.

      Based on the foregoing, we are of the opinion that Banco Azteca,
subsidiary of the Company, cannot disclose to the Company the information
required to be set forth in Item 7.B.3 of Form 20-F.

      This opinion is limited to matters of Mexican law in force on the date
hereof. We express no opinion with respect to the law of any other jurisdiction.

<PAGE>

                                       2

                             IRURITA ABOGADOS, S.C.

      This opinion is given as at the date hereof and we disclaim any obligation
or undertaking to advise any person of any change in law or fact which may come
to our attention after the date hereof.

      This opinion is being furnished by us as your special counsel on the
aspects described herein above and is solely for your benefit.

                                               Very Truly Yours,

                                               IRURITA ABOGADOS, S.C.


                                               /s/ Miguel Irurita Tomasena
                                               ---------------------------
. \, .: 

### CORPORATION

.. ·; ,, May 16,2013 Mr. Dennis DeVany Chief, Essential Air Service Division Office ofAviation Analysis US Department ofTransportation 1200 NewJersey Avenue SE Washington, DC 20590 Dear Mr. DeVany, RE: Continuation ofAlaska Airlines' fSSential Air Service atAdak, Alaska, Docket DOT-OST-2000-8556 ,/ The Aleut Corporation, the regional native corporation representing the Aleutian area, strongly supports the resolution submitted by Adak City Manager Layton Locketttitled: A RESOLUTION REQUESTING THE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION TO SELECT ALASKA AIRLINES AS THE ESSENTIAL AIR SERVICE PROVIDER FOR ADAK, ALASKA Many miles separate the island ofAdak from the major passenger and cargo hub in Anchorage and without a majorjetcarrier itwill be cut offfrom the lifeline of infrastructure. The Adak-based fisheries have relied on Alaska Airlines for shipping fish and transporting employees for manyyears. In accordance with the Adak Strategic Development Plan, jetservice by Alaska Airlines is vital to the enhanced economic development on the island. The Aleut Corporation sincerely thanks the Department ofTransportation forthe Essential Air Service program and looks forward to continued air service to Adak.

Thomas Mack, President Aleut Corporation
[DO NOT PUBLISH]

In the

United States Court of Appeals

For the Eleventh Circuit

____________________

No. 23-11821

Non-Argument Calendar

____________________

AMY HENSON, 

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

WALKER COUNTY, 

LARRY UNDERWOOD, 

Former Sheriff of Walker County, 

individually and in his official capacity,

SHERIFF, WALKER COUNTY, 

TRENT MCCLUSKEY, 

Former Jail Administrator, 

individually and in his official capacity,

JOSHUA DILL, 

in his official capacity,

USCA11 Case: 23-11821 Document: 21-1 Date Filed: 10/04/2023 Page: 1 of 3
2 Opinion of the Court 23-11821

JIM UNDERWOOD, 

Former Walker County Sheriff,

Defendants-Appellees,

WALKER COUNTY COMMISSION, et al.,

Defendants.

____________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Alabama

D.C. Docket No. 7:20-cv-00071-LSC

____________________

Before JILL PRYOR, GRANT, and ABUDU, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:

The appellees’ motion to dismiss this appeal as untimely is 

GRANTED. Because the district court entered its final order granting the remaining defendant’s motion for summary judgment in a 

document apart from a memorandum opinion, the separate document requirement for judgments was satisfied. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 

58(a). Amy Henson was thus required to file a notice of appeal on 

or before January 13, 2023, which was 30 days following the date 

judgment was deemed entered on December 14, 2022. See 28 

USCA11 Case: 23-11821 Document: 21-1 Date Filed: 10/04/2023 Page: 2 of 3
23-11821 Opinion of the Court 3

U.S.C. § 2107(a); Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(A), (7)(A)(ii). However, 

Henson did not file her notice of appeal until May 30, 2023.

Additionally, Henson did not seek relief from the appeal 

deadline under Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure 4(a)(5) or 

4(a)(6), and there is no basis in the record for such relief. Accordingly, the notice of appeal is untimely and cannot invoke our appellate jurisdiction. See Green v. Drug Enf’t Admin., 606 F.3d 1296, 

1300 (11th Cir. 2010) (noting that the timely filing of a notice of 

appeal in a civil case is a jurisdictional requirement, and we cannot 

entertain an appeal that is out of time).

Accordingly, this appeal is DISMISSED.

USCA11 Case: 23-11821 Document: 21-1 Date Filed: 10/04/2023 Page: 3 of 3
----

----

|   | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Corporation. |
|--------|----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                |   |   |   |                                                                                      |
|---------------------|--------|--------|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Date: June 11, 2015 |   |   |   | /s/ Thomas Roger Sawyer                                                                   |
|                |   |   |   | Thomas Roger Sawyer                                                                       |
|                |   |   |   | Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer (Acting Principal Accounting Officer) |

----

----
`Exhibit 31.2

                            Section 302 Certification
                            of Robert A. Comey (CFO)`

---

`CERTIFICATION


     I, Robert A. Comey, certify that:

     1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of MACC Private Equities
Inc.;

     2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement
of a  material  fact or  omit to sate a  material  fact  necessary  to make  the
statements made, in light of the circumstances  under which such statements were
made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

     3. Based on my knowledge,  the financial  statements,  and other  financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
condition,  results of  operations  and cash flows of the  registrant as of, and
for, the periods presented in this report;

     4. The  registrant's  other  certifying  officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining  disclosure  controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

          a) Designed such disclosure  controls and  procedures,  or caused such
     disclosure controls or procedures to be designed under our supervision,  to
     ensure that material information relating to the registrant,  including its
     consolidated  subsidiaries,  is made  known to us by  others  within  those
     entities,  particularly  during the  period in which  this  report is being
     prepared;

          b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
     and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
     controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report
     based on such evaluation; and

          c) Presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
     the disclosure  controls and  procedures  based on our evaluation as of the
     Evaluation Date;

     6. The registrant's other certifying  officers and I have disclosed,  based
on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial  reporting,  to
the  registrant's  auditors  and the audit  committee of  registrant's  board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

          a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
     control over financial  reporting which are reasonably  likely to adversely
     affect the registrant's  ability to record,  process,  summarize and report
     financial information; and

          b) any fraud,  whether or not material,  that  involves  management or
     other employees who have a significant  role in the  registrant's  internal
     controls.`

---

`Date: December 28, 2006


           /s/ Robert A. Comey
         ---------------------------
         Robert A. Comey
         Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer`
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Stephen J. Markman, Chief Justice

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano 

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 March 22, 2017

s0315

Order 

Clerk

March 22, 2017

153145

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 153145

COA: 329711

Wayne CC: 09-010770-FC

REGINALD DESHAWN WALKER, Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the December 16, 2015 

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has 

failed to meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D).