alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906  Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, the undersigned officer of LED Lighting Company (the "Company"), hereby certify to my knowledge that:  The Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2014 of the Company fully complies, in all material respects, with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained in the Report fairly represents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.  Date: May 15, 2014  /s/ Kevin Kearney Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
Appeal Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed September 25 , 2018

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14

- 18

- 00581

- CR

CRAIG DOUGHTY , Appellant

V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

On Appeal from the 412th District Court Brazoria County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 78393

- CR

MEMORANDUM OPINION Appellant pleaded guilty to one count of sexual assault of a child, criminal episode, and two counts of aggravated sexual assault of a child, criminal episode

. In accordance with the terms of a plea bargain agreement with the State, the trial court sentenced appellant to 25 years’ imprisonment for the first count and 25 years’ total for the second and third counts, with the sentences to r un concurrently. We dismiss the appeal.

The trial court entered a certification of the defendant’s right to appeal in2 which the court certified that this is a plea bargain case and the defendant has no right of appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(a)(2). The trial court’s certification is included in the record on appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(d). The record support s the trial court’s certification. See Dears v. State , 154 S.W.3d 610, 615 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005).
Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal.

PER CU RIAM

Panel consists of Justices Donovan, Wise , and Jewell

. Do Not Publish — Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b)
Fr om: "Steve M. Calderon" < Calderon.Steve@azdeq.gov >

To: Colleen McKaughan/R9/USEPA/US@EPA

Cc: "Lisa M. Tomczak" < Tomczak.Lisa@azdeq.gov >, Bryan Paris < Paris.Bryan@azdeq.gov > Date: 12/19/2012 02:55 PM Subject: Pinal County PM2.5 Clean Data Finding

December 19, 2012

Dear Mrs. McKaughan:

The Arizona Department of Environmental Quality (ADEQ) would like to formally request from the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) a clean data finding for Pinal County, Arizona for PM 2.5 for the period of 2009 through 2011. Thus far, Pinal County has recorded no exceedances of the PM 2.5 standard through December 19, 2012 from the Cowtown mon itor.

If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at: 602

- 771

- 2352.

Sincerely,

Steven M. Calderon, Manager State Implementation Plan Section Air Quality Division Arizona Department of Environmental Quality 1110 W. Washington Street

60 2

- 771

- 2352 smc@azdeq.gov

NOTICE: This e

- mail (and any attachments) may contain PRIVILEGED OR CONFIDENTIAL information and is intended only for the use of the specific individual(s) to whom it is addressed. It may contain information that is privileged and confidential under state and federal law. This information may be used or disclosed only in accordance with law, and you may be subject to penalties under law for improper use or further disclosure of the inf ormation in this e

- mail and its attachments. If you have received this e

- mail in error, please immediately notify the person named above by reply e

- mail, and then delete the original e

- mail. Thank you.
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk's Office, Atlanta, February 10, 2020. I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written. , Clerk. 

# Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA, February 10, 2020 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order A20I0162. U. S. BANK TRUST NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AS DELAWARE TRUSTEE v. CHIEFTAIN ATLANTA, L.P.
Upon consideration of the Application for Interlocutory Appeal, it is ordered that it be hereby GRANTED. The Appellant may file a Notice of Appeal within 10 days of the date of this order. The Clerk of Superior Court is directed to include a copy of this order in the record transmitted to the Court of Appeals.
LC NUMBERS: 18A00283
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 621 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 621

To amend the Controlled Substances Act to make any substance containing 
                    hydrocodone a schedule II drug.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 20, 2013

 Mr. Manchin (for himself, Mr. Kirk, Mrs. Feinstein, Mr. Rockefeller, 
Mrs. Gillibrand, and Mr. Schumer) introduced the following bill; which 
     was read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Controlled Substances Act to make any substance containing 
                    hydrocodone a schedule II drug.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Safe Prescribing Act of 2013''.

SEC. 2. HYDROCODONE AMENDMENT.

    (a) In General.--Schedule III(d) in section 202 of the Controlled 
Substances Act (21 U.S.C. 812) is amended by--
            (1) striking paragraphs (3) and (4); and
            (2) redesignating paragraphs (5), (6), (7), and (8) as 
        paragraphs (3), (4), (5), and (6), respectively.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendments made by subsection (a) shall 
take effect on the date that is 6 months after the date of enactment of 
this Act.

SEC. 3. PHYSICAL SECURITY REQUIREMENTS.

    Notwithstanding the amendments made by section 2, the Attorney 
General shall immediately, without regard to chapter 5 of title 5, 
United States Code, amend section 1301.72 of title 21, Code of Federal 
Regulations, relating to the physical security controls for non-
practitioners, narcotic treatment programs and compounders for narcotic 
treatment programs, and storage areas for controlled substances, to 
allow, for the 3-year period beginning on the date of enactment of this 
Act, manufacturers and distributors to store hydrocodone combination 
products in accordance with the physical security requirements for 
schedule III, IV, and V controlled substances.

SEC. 4. GAO REPORT.

    (a) In General.--Not later than 18 months after the date of 
enactment of this Act, the Comptroller General of the United States 
shall submit to Congress a report on the reclassification of 
hydrocodone products under this Act.
    (b) Contents.--The report required under subsection (a) shall 
include--
            (1) an assessment of the degree to which the 
        reclassification of hydrocodone products under this Act impacts 
        the ability of patients with legitimate medical needs, 
        particularly those in rural areas and nursing home facilities, 
        to access adequate pain management; and
            (2) recommendations necessary to address issues, if any, 
        relating to patient access to adequate pain management.
                                 <all>
```
```

                                                                    EXHIBIT 31.1

                                 CERTIFICATIONS

I, Joseph Fewer certify that:

1.   I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of
     GroGenesis, Inc.; and

2.   Based on my knowledge, this Quarterly Report does not contain any untrue
     statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
     make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
     statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
     this quarterly report.

Date: May 14, 2015

By: /s/ Joseph Fewer
   -----------------------------------
   Joseph Fewer
   Chief Executive Officer and
   Chief Financial Officer
```
```

[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 129 (Friday, July 5, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Page 40545]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-16077]

[[Page 40545]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 8368]

Designation of Abd Al-Ra'Ouf Abu Zaid Mohamed Hamza, also known 
as Abdul Rauf Abuzaid, also known as Abdel Raouf Abu Zayid Hamza, also 
known as Abdelraouf Abu Zaid Mohamed Hamzza Yasir, also known as Abdel 
Raouf Abu Zaid Mohamed, also known as Abd-al-Ra'uf Abu Zayd Muhammad 
Hamza, also known as Abdul Raouf Abu Zeid Muhammad Hamza, as a 
Specially Designated Global Terrorist Pursuant to Section 1(b) of 
Executive Order 13224, as Amended

    Acting under the authority of and in accordance with section 1(b) 
of Executive Order 13224 of September 23, 2001, as amended by Executive 
Order 13268 of July 2, 2002, and Executive Order 13284 of January 23, 
2003, I hereby determine that the individual known as Abd Al-Ra'Ouf Abu 
Zaid Mohamed Hamza, also known as Abdul Rauf Abuzaid, also known as 
Abdel Raouf Abu Zayid Hamza, also known as Abdelraouf Abu Zaid Mohamed 
Hamzza Yasir, also known as Abdel Raouf Abu Zaid Mohamed, also known as 
Abd-al-Ra'uf Abu Zayd Muhammad Hamza, also known as Abdul Raouf Abu 
Zeid Muhammad Hamza, committed, or poses a significant risk of 
committing, acts of terrorism that threaten the security of U.S. 
nationals or the national security, foreign policy, or economy of the 
United States.
    Consistent with the determination in Section 10 of Executive Order 
13224 that ``prior notice to persons determined to be subject to the 
Order who might have a constitutional presence in the United States 
would render ineffectual the blocking and other measures authorized in 
the Order because of the ability to transfer funds instantaneously,'' I 
determine that no prior notice needs to be provided to any person 
subject to this determination who might have a constitutional presence 
in the United States, because to do so would render ineffectual the 
measures authorized in the Order.
    This notice shall be published in the Federal Register.

    Dated: June 20, 2013.
John F. Kerry,
Secretary of State.
[FR Doc. 2013-16077 Filed 7-3-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-10-P
```
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT 

No. 08-8569

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 Plaintiff - Appellee, 

 v. 

KOJI S. STEWART, a/k/a Bling, 

 Defendant - Appellant. 

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western 

District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Frank D. Whitney, 

District Judge. (3:05-cr-00104-FDW-CH-5; 3:08−cv−00487−FDW) 

Submitted: June 22, 2009 Decided: June 26, 2009 

Before MICHAEL, TRAXLER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. 

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. 

Koji S. Stewart, Appellant Pro Se. Amy Elizabeth Ray, Assistant 

United States Attorney, Asheville, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 
2 

PER CURIAM: 

Koji S. Stewart seeks to appeal the district court’s 

order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 2008) 

motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or 

judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. 

§ 2253(c)(1) (2006). A certificate of appealability will not 

issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a 

constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006). A 

prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that 

reasonable jurists would find that any assessment of the 

constitutional claims by the district court is debatable or 

wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by the district 

court is likewise debatable. Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 

322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); 

Rose v. Lee, 252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001). We have 

independently reviewed the record and conclude that Stewart has 

not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a 

certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We 

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the 

court and argument would not aid the decisional process. 

DISMISSED
### T E X A S C O U R T O F A P P E A L S , T H I R D D I S T R I C T , A T A U S T I N

NO. 03-12-00470- CV

S. E. T ., Jr., Appellant

v. The State of Texas, App ellee

F ROM TH E DISTRI CT COURT O F WI LLIAM SO N COUNTY , 368 TH JUDICI AL DISTRICT

NO. 12- 0476 -C36 8, H ONO RAB LE B URT CARNES, JUDGE P RESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

I t a ppear s that S.E.T., Jr., is a ttempting to appea l from the trial court’s denial of his petition for expunction, which the court’s docket sheet indicates occur red on J u n e 1 8 , 2 012.
Howeve r, the rec ord does not include a s i gn ed copy of an order or judgme nt ref lecting final dispositi on of the case . On Oct o b er 2 6 , 2 0 1 2 , this Court sent counsel for S.E.T., J r., a letter informing appellant that the clerk’s record did not include a final j udg ment, direc ting a ppellant to obtain a final judgme nt from the trial court and ensure that i t wa s fi l ed in a supplemental cler k’s

rec ord by November 9, and informing appellant that failure to do so would result in dismiss al of the
appea l for want of jurisdiction. This Court was informed by the cler k of the trial court that no final order has bee n submitt ed and the ref ore no suppleme ntal rec ord will be filed. Wit h exceptions not applicable here , an appea l may only be prosec uted from a final judgme nt. North E. Indep. Sch. Dist. v. Aldridge , 400 S.W .2d 893, 895 (Tex. 1966). The rec ord inthis case does not include a signe d copy of an order or judgme nt finally disposing of the case . The

docket entry does not sa tisfy this re quirement beca use docket entries are made only for the c ourt’s convenie nce and m ay b e unreliable , and an appellate court may not consider them. State Farm 1
Fire & Cas. Co. v. Ree d , 826 S.W .2d 659, 661 (Tex. App.—Houston [14t h Dist.] 1992), a f f ’d , 8 7 3 S

. W

. 2 d 698 (Tex. 1993). We do not acc ept the trial court’s docket entry here as a fi n al judgme nt and, conseque ntly , we dismiss the appea l for lack of jurisdiction. Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(a)

.

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ J . Woodfin J ones, Chief Just ice
Be fore Chief J ustice Jones, J ustices Rose and Goodw in Dismissed for Want of J urisdiction Filed: De cembe r 7, 2012

Docke t entries may be considere d in cer tain situations, none of which exis ts in the prese nt 1 case . See E

scobar v. Esc obar , 711 S.W .2d 230, 232 (Tex. 1986) (to deter mine whether court had authority to rende r judgme nt nunc pro tunc); Buffalo Bag Co. v. Joachim , 704 S.W .2d 482, 484 (Tex. App.—Houston [14t h Dist.] 1986, writ ref ’d n.r.e.) (to deter

mine whether motion for new trial lost by cler k was filed); Pruet v. Coasta l S t a t es Trading, Inc. , 715 S.W .2d 702, 705 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 1986, no writ) (to deter mine cler ical err or in nunc pro tunc proce eding ). 2
# Europos Sąjungos C 222I/2021

| | ISSN 1977-0960 |
| --- | --- |
| Europos Sąjungos
  oficialusis leidinys | C 222I |
| | |
| Leidimas lietuvių kalba | Informacija ir pranešimai | 64 metai2021m. birželio 11d. |

ISSN 1977-0960

Europos Sąjungos

oficialusis leidinys

C 222I

Leidimas lietuvių kalba

Informacija ir pranešimai

64 metai2021m. birželio 11d.

---

| Turinys | Puslapis |
| --- | --- |
| | II   Komunikatai |
| | EUROPOS SĄJUNGOS INSTITUCIJŲ, ĮSTAIGŲ IR ORGANŲ PRIIMTI KOMUNIKATAI |
| | Taryba |
| 2021/C 222 I/01 | Komisijos pareiškimas | 1 |

Turinys

Puslapis

II   Komunikatai

EUROPOS SĄJUNGOS INSTITUCIJŲ, ĮSTAIGŲ IR ORGANŲ PRIIMTI KOMUNIKATAI

Taryba

2021/C 222 I/01

Komisijos pareiškimas

1

---

| LT | |
| --- | --- |

LT

---

II Komunikatai

EUROPOS SĄJUNGOS INSTITUCIJŲ, ĮSTAIGŲ IR ORGANŲ PRIIMTI KOMUNIKATAI

Taryba

| 2021 6 11 | LT | Europos Sąjungos oficialusis leidinys | CI 222/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2021 6 11

LT

Europos Sąjungos oficialusis leidinys

CI 222/1

---

Komisijos pareiškimas

(2021/C 222 I/01)

Komisija pripažįsta bendros licencijavimo ir vykdymo užtikrinimo gebėjimų stiprinimo bei mokymo programos svarbą veiksmingai ES eksporto kontrolės sistemai užtikrinti. Siekdama nustatyti gebėjimų stiprinimo ir mokymo programos rengimo ir įgyvendinimo būdus, Komisija, konsultuodamasi su dvejopo naudojimo prekių kontrolės koordinavimo grupe, įsipareigoja tirti, kokį poveikį tokia programa gali turėti žmogiškiesiems ir finansiniams ištekliams.

---
Exhibit 32.2

AMERICAN REALTY CAPITAL PROPERTIES, INC.

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of American Realty Capital Properties, Inc. (the Company) for the
fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2014 (the Report), I, Michael Sodo, Executive Vice President, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify to my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                    |  |  |  |     |  |                                                                
|------------------- |  |  |  | --- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: March 2, 2015 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/ Michael Sodo                                               
|                    |  |  |  |     |  | Michael Sodo                                                   
|                    |  |  |  |     |  | Executive Vice President, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and
will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
H. R. 4122

One Hundred Third Congress

of the

United States of America

AT THE SECOND SESSION

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,

the twenty-fifth day of January, one thousand nine hundred and ninety-four

An Act

To temporarily extend certain provisions of the Marine Mammal Protection Act.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled, That section

114(a)(1) of the Marine Mammal Protection Act of 1972 (16 U.S.C.

1383a(a)(1)), is amended by striking ‘‘April 1, 1994,’’ and inserting

in lieu thereof ‘‘May 1, 1994.’’.

Speaker of the House of Representatives.

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
Exhibit 32.1

Certification of
Principal Executive OfficerPursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Phoenix Agri Enterprises, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period
ended April 30, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Benjamin
Chen, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained
in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

|Date: August 22, 2011 |                                                         | /s/ Benjamin Chen
|--------------------- | ------------------------------------------------------- | -----------------
|                      | Name: Benjamin Chen
        Principal Executive Officer
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT

MOISES RUBIO, DOC #H47218, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D18-2344 ) STATE OF FLORIDA, ) ) Appellee. ) ) Opinion filed July 12, 2019. Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Polk County; Wayne M. Durden, Judge.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
SILBERMAN, BLACK, and BADALAMENTI, JJ., Concur.
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLAImages

# DLA Images

Search

Search

                                  - All Images 
                                  - Other 

                                  - Upload Date
                                  - Photo Date
                                  - Title

Share

----

Download Image: Small ()Medium ()Full Size (0.36 MB)

Tags:senior enlisted leader, fort belvoir, McNamara Headquarters Complex, Air Force Lt. Gen. Andy Busch, Defense Logistics Agency Director, Army Command Sgt. Maj. Charles Tobin, dla, People and Culture, Defense Logistics Agency

Photo by:VIRIN: 

Photo Gallery