alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Liliam CENTENO, Petitioner, v. U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL, Department of Justice, Respondents.

No. 05-13003

Non-Argument Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.

Feb. 17, 2006.

Mario M. Lovo, Law Firm of Mario M. Lovo, Miami, FL, for Centeno.

Barry J. Pettinato, David V. Bernal, Russell J.E. Verby, U.S. Dept, of Justice, OIL, Washington, DC, for Respondents.

Before MARCUS, WILSON and HILL, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Liiiam Centeno, a native and citizen of Nicaragua, seeks review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) decision, affirming the Immigration Judge’s (“IJ”) order denying her application for adjustment of status under the Nicaraguan Adjustment and Central American Relief Act of 1997 (“NACARA”), Pub.L.No. 105-100, § 202, 111 Stat. 2160, 2193 (1998). The IJ found that Centeno had provided no statutorily sufficient evidence to establish her presence in the United States prior to December 1995, and, therefore, she was *905statutorily ineligible for permanent resident status.

Centeno argues that she presented sufficient evidence to establish her presence in the United States prior to December 1995, because 8 C.F.R. 245.13 uses permissive language, and, thus, the types of evidence enumerated there are illustrative, rather than exhaustive. Therefore, she contends, an envelope bearing a Nicaraguan postal mark reading “Navidad 1995” and addressed to her in Miami, Florida, was sufficient proof of her presence in the United States, especially since the address contained on that envelope was consistent with the information contained in a Department of Justice “Biographical Information” form, also submitted to the court.

Before considering the merits of a petition, we “must first consider whether we have subject matter jurisdiction to hear the petition at all.” *Resendiz-Alcaraz v. U.S. Att’y Gen.,*383 F.3d 1262, 1266 (11th Cir.2004). Section 202(f) of NACARA states that “[a] determination by the Attorney General as to whether the status of any alien should be adjusted under this section is final and shall not be subject to review by any court.” *Id.*Additionally, we have held that “[a] decision by the Attorney General regarding whether an alien established that his status should be adjusted under NACARA is not review able by any court.” *Ortega v. U.S. Att’y Gen.,*416 F.3d 1348, 1350 (11th Cir.2005). As the IJ, affirmed by the BIA, has denied Centeno’s application for adjustment of status under the NACARA, we are without jurisdiction to review this decision, and the petition must be dismissed.

Accordingly, the petition is

DISMISSED.
EXHIBIT 24 -- POWERS OF ATTORNEY

POWER OF ATTORNEY


	KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS, that the undersigned, John Belknap, 
appoints Robert E. Swanson and Martin V. Quinn, and each of them, as his true 
and lawful attorneys-in-fact with full power to act and do all things 
necessary, advisable or appropriate, in their discretion, to execute on his 
behalf as an Independent Trustee of Ridgewood Electric Power Trust I and of  
Ridgewood Electric Power Trust IV, the Annual Reports on Form 10-K for the 
year ended December 31, 1997 for each of the above-named trusts, and all 
amendments or documents relating thereto.

	IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Power of Attorney 
this 30th day of March, 1998, at Fort Lauderdale, Florida.

					    /s/John Belknap
						John Belknap

POWER OF ATTORNEY


	KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS, that the undersigned, Richard 
Propper, M.D., appoints Robert E. Swanson and Martin V. Quinn, and each of 
them, as his true and lawful attorneys-in-fact with full power to act and do 
all things necessary, advisable or appropriate, in their discretion, to 
execute on his behalf as an Independent Trustee of Ridgewood Electric Power 
Trust I and of  Ridgewood Electric Power Trust IV, the Annual Reports on Form 
10-K for the year ended December 31, 1997 for each of the above-named trusts, 
and all amendments or documents relating thereto.

	IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Power of Attorney 
this 30th day of March, 1998, at Fort Lauderdale, Florida.

					     /s/Richard Propper, M.D.
						Richard Propper, M.D.
**AD Economic Evaluation**

Docket No . FAA - 2012 - 0716 Directorate ID : 2012 - SW - 011 - AD Helicopter Model: Bell Helicopter Textron Canada Model 407 and 427 Helicopters Number of Helicopters (U.S. Operators): 582 Helicopters in the US Registry . Reason : The actions of this AD are intended to detect any loose or misaligned parts in the hydraulic servo actuators that could lead to failure of the servo and subsequent loss of helicopter control. Costs : Parts per Helicopter $ 33,000 L abor per Helicopter ( 0.5 x $ 8 5 /work - hour for the inspection) (2 x $85/work - hour for the replacement) $ 43 $170 Other (Explain) Total Cost per Helicopter $ 43 for the inspection $33,170 for the replacement Total US Fleet Cost $25,026 for the inspection Executive Order 12866 : Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action?” Yes ( ) No (  ) DOT Regulatory

Policies and Procedures : Is the AD significant? Yes ( ) Explain Below No (  ) Regulatory

Flexibility

Act : Will the AD have a s ignificant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? Yes ( ) No (  ) Project Engineer : Matt Wilbanks
CNP_Exhibit 10(mm)_12.31.2013






Exhibit 10(mm)
 
CenterPoint Energy, Inc.
Summary of Senior Executive Officer Compensation
 
The following is a summary of compensation paid to the Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and Executive Vice Presidents identified below (to whom we collectively refer as our “senior executive officers”) of CenterPoint Energy, Inc. (the “Company”). For additional information regarding the compensation of the senior executive officers, please read the definitive proxy statement relating to the Company’s 2014 annual meeting of shareholders to be filed pursuant to Regulation 14A.


Base Salary. The following table sets forth the annual base salary of the Company’s senior executive officers effective April 1, 2014:
	
					
	Name and Position
	 
	Base Salary

	Scott M. Prochazka
President and Chief Executive Officer
	 
	$
	900,000
	


	 
Gary L. Whitlock
Executive Vice President
and Chief Financial Officer
	 
	$
	600,000
	


	 
Scott E. Rozzell
Executive Vice President, General
Counsel and Corporate Secretary
	 
	$
	530,000
	


	 
Thomas R. Standish
Executive Vice President 
	 
	$
	512,000
	





     
Short Term Incentive Plan. Annual bonuses are paid to the Company’s senior executive officers pursuant to the Company’s short term incentive plan, which provides for cash bonuses based on the achievement of certain performance objectives approved in accordance with the terms of the plan at the commencement of the year. Information regarding awards to the Company’s senior executive officers under the short term incentive plan is provided in definitive proxy statements relating to the Company’s annual meeting of shareholders.


Long Term Incentive Plan. Under the Company’s long term incentive plan, the Company’s senior executive officers may receive grants of (i) stock option awards, (ii) stock appreciation rights, (iii) stock awards, (iv) restricted stock unit awards, (v) cash awards and (vi) performance awards. The current forms of the applicable award agreements pursuant to the Company’s long term incentive plan are included as exhibits hereto.
----

COUNCIL DECISION

of 29 November 2004

appointing a member of the Advisory Committee of the Euratom Supply Agency

(2004/C 305/02)

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Atomic Energy Community, and in particular the second and third paragraphs of Article 54 thereof,

Having regard to Article X of the Statutes of the Euratom Supply Agency (1), as last amended by Decision 95/1/EC, Euratom, ECSC of 1 January 1995 (2),

Having regard to the Council Decision of 22 September 2003 appointing the members of the Advisory Committee of the Euratom Supply Agency (3),

Having regard to the opinion of the Commission,

Whereas:

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Sole Article

Ms Jeanne MARCUCCI is hereby appointed a member of the Advisory Committee of the Euratom Supply Agency for the remainder of the Committee's term of office, ending on 28 March 2005.

Done at Brussels, 29 November 2004.

For the Council

The President

L. J. BRINKHORST

----

(1)OJ 27, 6.12.1958, p. 534/58.

(2)OJ L 1, 1.1.1995, p. 1.

(3)OJ C 232, 27.9.2003, p. 1.

----
Andrew W. Bonney

Senior Vice President of Planning

660 Barnstable Rd., Hyannis, MA 02601

Direct:508 862-9719 Fax:508 862-9791

Email: andrew.bonney@capeair.com

Kevin Schlemmer, Director

EAS Program, U. S. Department of Transportation

1200 New Jersey Ave. SE

Washington D.C. 20590

,"-1'

t' ~ ;-)

Reference DOT-OST-2000-7856

Dear Kevin,

February 17,2014

Cape Air is honored to be a robust partner for the US DOT in the Essential Air Service

Program. We are presently flying for 20 EAS communities and ridership in all is strong.

As Cape Air's service for small communities seems to be working for the communities,

the Department and our airline, over time we would like to pursue serving additional

EAS communities. This letter is to infonn you that we are considering proposing service

to some of the EAS communities in Alabama and Mississippi when next they come up

for bid. We are confident that our fonnula of high-frequency small-aircraft service will

increase ridership and decrease the Department's per-passenger cost, as has happened at

other EAS communities we serve. While we have a tremendous amount of homework to

do before pursuing a proposal, we envision the creation of a new Cape Air EAS hublet at

Memphis or Nashville, based on the model we have successfully expanded from Boston

to St. Louis and Billings, MT.

One of the cities in which we are interested is Muscle Shoals, Alabama. We understand

that Muscle Shoals' traffic has declined recently from between 15,000 and 17,000 annual

passengers to under 5,000 annual passengers. Based on our recent history in the EAS

program-and the strong fundamentals at Muscle Shoals-we believe that Cape Air

service will likely be able to resurrect ridership. We hope your department will re-RFP

Muscle Shoals.

Thank you for any consideration of our interest in this matter.

Best regards,
#### Mary R. Proia, Respondent, v Rosalie Proia, as Personal Representative of Carl T. Proia, Deceased, Appellant.

? Order unanimously affirmed without costs for the reasons stated in decision at Supreme Court, Patlow, J. (Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Monroe County, Patlow, J.—Declaratory Judgment.) Present—Dillon, P. J., Doerr, Boomer, Pine and Lawton, JJ.
I

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 3925

To authorize and request a posthumous commission in the Army for Johnson

Chesnut Whittaker.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 1, 1994

Mr. CLYBURN introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Armed Services

A BILL

To authorize and request a posthumous commission in the

Army for Johnson Chesnut Whittaker.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. REQUEST FOR POSTHUMOUS APPOINTMENT AS

4 A COMMISSIONED OFFICER IN THE ARMY.

5 The President is authorized and requested to issue,

6 or have issued, a posthumous commission in the name of

7 Johnson Chesnut Whittaker of South Carolina in the

8 grade of second lieutenant in the regular Army, as

9 recompense for the unjust separation of Johnson Chesnut

10 Whittaker from the Corps of Cadets of the United States
2

•HR 3925 IH

1 Military Academy and the United States Army in the early

2 1880’s.

3 SEC. 2. BENEFITS.

4 Section 1523 of title 10, United States Code, shall

5 apply to a commission issued as requested in section 1.

Æ
DISMISSED and Opinion Filed March 21, 2013

S

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-12-00156-CV

COLONIAL COUNTY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY AND 

NATIONWIDE INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellants

V.

GREGORY DUANE FRAZIER, TRUSTEE OF THE R&P ARLEDGE 

CHILDREN'S TRUST, AS SOLE SHAREHOLDER AND BENEFICIAL OWNER OF 

THE ASSETS OF EXPRESSWAY FINANCIAL, INC., Appellee

On Appeal from the 134th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 10-02020

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Chief Justice Wright and Justices Lang-Miers and Lewis 

Opinion by Chief Justice Wright

Before the Court is the parties’ February 27, 2013 agreed motion to dismiss the appeal. 

The parties have informed the Court that they have settled their differences. Accordingly, we 

grant the parties’ motion and dismiss the appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(2).

120156F.P05

/Carolyn Wright/

CAROLYN WRIGHT

CHIEF JUSTICE
1200156.R.docx 2

Court of 

S

Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

JUDGMENT

COLONIAL COUNTY MUTUAL 

INSURANCE COMPANY AND 

NATIONWIDE INSURANCE COMPANY, 

Appellants

No. 05-12-00156-CV V.

GREGORY DUANE FRAZIER, TRUSTEE 

OF THE R&P ARLEDGE CHILDREN'S 

TRUST, AS SOLE SHAREHOLDER AND 

BENEFICIAL OWNER OF THE ASSETS 

OF EXPRESSWAY FINANCIAL, INC., 

Appellee

On Appeal from the 134th Judicial District 

Court, Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 10-02020.

Opinion delivered by Chief Justice Wright. 

Justices Lang-Miers and Lewis participating.

In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, the appeal is DISMISSED.

It is ORDERED that each party bear its own costs of the appeal.

Judgment entered March 21, 2013.

/Carolyn Wright/

CAROLYN WRIGHT

CHIEF JUSTICE
----

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

of 1 March 2005

in Case T-143/03 Elisabeth Saskia Smit v European Police Office (Europol) (1)

(Temporary staff - Europol staff - Non-extension of employment contract)

(2005/C 106/52)

Language of the case: Dutch

In Case T-143/03: Elisabeth Saskia Smit, a former member of the staff of Europol, residing in Scheveningen (Netherlands), represented by F. Baltussen, P. de Casparis and D.C. Coppens, lawyers, against the European Police Office (Europol), the seat of which is at The Hague (Netherlands) (Agents: D. Heimans and K. Hennessy-Massaro, and, at the hearing, N. Urban) — application for annulment of Europol's decision not to extend the term of the applicant's contract of employment and for compensation for the loss allegedly suffered — the Court of First Instance (Second Chamber), composed of J. Pirrung, President, A.W.H. Meij and I. Pelikánova, Judges; J. Plingers, Administrator, for the Registrar, has given a judgment on 1 March 2005, in which it:

----

(1)OJ C 213 of 6.9.2003.

----
Exhibit 32

Certification of CEO and CFO Pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

as Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of TPG Specialty Lending, Inc. (the Company) for the quarterly period ended
June 30, 2016, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), Joshua Easterly and Michael Fishman, as Co-Chief Executive Officers of the Company, and Ian Simmonds, as Chief Financial Officer of
the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to such officers knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.



|                    |  |                           
|------------------- |  | --------------------------
|/s/ Joshua Easterly
|Name:               |  | Joshua Easterly           
|Title:              |  | Co-Chief Executive Officer
|Date:               |  | August 3, 2016            
|                   
|/s/ Michael Fishman
|Name:               |  | Michael Fishman           
|Title:              |  | Co-Chief Executive Officer
|Date:               |  | August 3, 2016            
|                   
|/s/ Ian Simmonds   
|Name:               |  | Ian Simmonds              
|Title:              |  | Chief Financial Officer   
|Date:               |  | August 3, 2016            

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350 and is not being filed
as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.
1 

FY 2022 Report to the US Congress on Activities 

DFC’s Independent Accountability Mechanism 

(IAM)/Office of Accountability (OA) 

Message from the Director 

As with the IAMs associated with other international and bilateral development finance 

institutions, the last year was a particularly challenging one for us due to COVID. The Office of 

Accountability typically does not receive more than one or two eligible complaints and this past 

year we did not receive any. 

The OA’s main activity centered around the development of a new Outreach Strategy and 

beginning the revision of the “Operational Guidelines Handbook for Problem-Solving and 

Compliance Review Services.” 

The Office has also established a working relationship with DFC’s Office of the Inspector 

General and begun referring ineligible complaints to the OA involving procurement, contractual 

or purely commercial issues to the IG Office. We are also working with the IG Office to set up 

joint reporting to DFC’s Board of Directors. 

Highlights 

Case Management 

The OA did not receive any submissions regarding problem-solving or compliance review in the 

last fiscal year. The lack of submissions was probably due to some extent to the COVID 

pandemic. Another reason, however, might have been the lack of awareness on the part of 

effected communities and CSOs where DFC projects take place, that the Office of 

Accountability exists and how to contact it. For this reason we decided to undertake an 

assessment of the way in which DFC clients have been informing their employees and affected 

communities on the existence of the Office of Accountability and how they might contact it. On 

the basis of that assessment, an Outreach Strategy to increase utilization of the mechanism and 

meet board requirements in the latest Board Resolution (BDR(22)45) will be prepared. The 

Outreach Strategy will be submitted to the Board for their information and approval in early 

2023. 
2 

Resources 

The OA/IAM’s expenses are included in the overall budget for the Office of the President. The 

Director is authorized to hire consultants and incur other expenses as needed for both casespecific and other functions. For FY 2022, besides the Director’s salary and benefits, the OA 

incurred expenses of $156,346.00 paid to Dalberg Advisors for carrying out the “Assessment 

and advisory report to assist DFC clients in disclosing information about the Office of 

Accountability” described above.

William Kennedy 

Director, Office of Accountability 

.
#### In the Matter of Gerrard B., Appellant.

In a juvenile delinquency proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 3, the appeal is from an order of disposition of the Family Court, Queens County (De Phillips, J.), dated November 4, 1988, which, upon a fact-finding order of the same court, dated October 24, 1988, made after a hearing, finding that the appellant had committed acts which, if committed by an adult, would have constituted the crimes of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree and criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree, adjudged him to be a juvenile delinquent and placed him with the New York State Division for Youth, Title II, for a period not to exceed 18 months. The appeal brings up for review the fact-finding order dated October 24, 1988.

Ordered that the order of disposition is affirmed, without *661costs or disbursements *(see, Matter of Luther R.,*172 AD2d 672 [decided herewith]). Lawrence, J. P., Harwood, Balletta and Rosenblatt, JJ., concur.
EXHIBIT 32


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, the
undersigned officer of the Oakwood Acquisition Corporation
(the "Company"), hereby certify to my knowledge that:

The Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30,
2011 of the Company fully complies, in all material respects,
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained in the
Report fairly represents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by
the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.


                             /s/ James M. Cassidy
                                 President, Director,
                                 Chief Executivie Officer,
                                 Chief Financial Officer and
                                 Principal Accounting Officer
Date: August 15, 2011
#### 730 Supermarket Corp., Appellant, v Byron Boyce Co., Inc., et al., Defendants, and Myron Boyce et al., Respondents.

In an action, *inter alia,*to compel the conveyance of real property, the plaintiff appeals, as limited by its notice of appeal and brief, from so much of a judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Zeck, J.H.O.), entered April 19, 1989, as, after a nonjury trial, dismissed the complaint insofar as asserted against the respondents.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

The plaintiff’s complaint is premised on the failure of the defendant Sirbo Holdings Corp. to honor a right of first refusal to purchase premises in accordance with one of the provisions *512of a lease formerly existing between these two parties. The Supreme Court found the failure to have been without justification. The plaintiff, which has since assigned the lease and sold the supermarket business it operated on the premises, settled this action as against the defendants David and Leah Kaplan, to whom the defendant Sirbo Holdings Corp. sold those premises, thus precluding equitable relief normally available in cases such as this *(see, Cortese v Connors,*1 NY2d 265; *Tarallo v Norstar Bank,*144 AD2d 157; *Quigley v Capolongo, 53*AD2d 714, *affd*43 NY2d 748).

We agree with the plaintiff that the Supreme Court, in declining to award damages, erroneously regarded this case as if it were one for breach of an option to purchase rather than the different right of first refusal *(see, LIN Broadcasting Corp. v Metromedia, Inc.,*74 NY2d 54, 60; *Metropolitan Transp. Auth. v Bruken Realty Corp.,*67 NY2d 156, 163; *R.I. Realty Co. v Terrell,*254 NY 121; *see also, Cortese v Connors, supra,).*We nonetheless agree with the Supreme Court’s conclusion that the plaintiff is not entitled to damages representing , the difference between the value of its business if it owned the realty on which that business was conducted and the value of the business absent such ownership. The plaintiff has failed to demonstrate that the claimed loss in value was within the contemplation of the parties to the lease at the time they executed it or that the loss was an incidental damage flowing from the breach relied upon *(cf., Kenford Co. v County of Erie,*67 NY2d 257, 261; *Witherbee v Meyer,*155 NY 466). Since the plaintiff offered no proof of damages stemming from the loss of its bargain for the right of first refusal, the Supreme Court properly concluded that no damage had been sustained. Brown, J. P., Kooper, Harwood and Miller, JJ., concur.