alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>
 
                                                                      EXHIBIT 21
                                                                      ----------

                        Subsidiaries of the Registrant
                        ------------------------------
<TABLE> 
<CAPTION> 
Name                                         State of Organization
----                                         ---------------------
<S>                                          <C> 
Century Holdings, Inc.                       Tennessee
Champion Carrier Corporation                 Delaware
Miller Industries Towing Equipment, Inc.     Delaware
Century Wrecker (Canada) Ltd.                Ontario, Canada
Miller Industries International, Inc.        Tennessee
Boniface Engineering Limited                 England and Wales
Jige International                           France
Miller Financial Services Group, Inc.        Delaware
Miller/Greeneville, Inc.                     Tennessee
Vulcan Equipment Company, Inc.               Mississippi
Vulcan International, Inc.                   Mississippi
Financial Services Group                     Tennessee
</TABLE> 

The Registrant owns 33 towing service subsidiaries operating in the United
States.

The Registrant owns 8 towing equipment distributor subsidiaries operating in the
United States and 2 towing equipment subsidiaries operating in foreign
countries.
Exhibit 31.1

                                 CERTIFICATIONS

I, Roy Israel, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of  clickNsettle.com,  Inc.
(the "registrant");

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact  necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the  circumstances  under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.  Based  on my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and  other  financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial  condition,  results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.  The  registrant's  other  certifying  officer  and  I  are  responsible  for
establishing and maintaining  disclosure  controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a) designed such disclosure  controls and procedures,  or caused such disclosure
controls and  procedures to be designed  under our  supervision,  to ensure that
material  information  relating to the  registrant,  including its  consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,  particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) evaluated  the  effectiveness  of the  registrant's  disclosure  controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions  about the effectiveness
of the disclosure  controls and procedures,  as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over
financial  reporting that occurred during the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter
that has materially affected,  or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed,  based on our
most recent  evaluation of internal  control over  financial  reporting,  to the
registrant's  auditors  and the audit  committee  of the  registrant's  board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

      a)    All significant  deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
            control over  financial  reporting  which are  reasonably  likely to
            adversely  affect  the  registrant's  ability  to  record,  process,
            summarize and report financial information; and

      b)    Any fraud,  whether or not  material,  that  involves  management or
            other  employees  who have a  significant  role in the  registrant's
            internal control over financial reporting.

Date: October 3, 2005


/s/ Roy Israel
------------------------------------
Roy Israel - Chairman of the Board, CEO and President


                                       26
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

Securities and Exchange Commission

100 F Street, N.E.

Washington, D.C. 20549

 

RE:     Certification pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350)

 

Ladies and Gentlemen:

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of SandRidge Mississippian Trust I (the “Trust”) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2017 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, not in its individual capacity but solely as the Trustee of the Trust, certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, that to its knowledge:

 

(1)                                     The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

(2)                                     The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Trust.

 

The above certification is furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350) and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.

 
|   | /s/ Sarah Newell                                                                                 |
|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   | Sarah Newell                                                                                     |
|   | Vice President                                                                                   |
|   | The Bank of New York   Mellon Trust Company, N.A., as Trustee of SandRidge Mississippian Trust I |

 

May 10, 2017

 

----
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-7471

MELVIN DOUGLAS SMITH, JR.,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

GENE M. JOHNSON,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, District

Judge. (CA-03-802)

Submitted: January 26, 2005 Decided: February 17, 2005

Before LUTTIG, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Melvin Douglas Smith, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Kathleen Beatty

Martin, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond,

Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Melvin Douglas Smith, Jr., seeks to appeal the district

court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.

§ 2254 (2000). An appeal may not be taken from the final order in

a § 2254 proceeding unless a circuit justice or judge issues a

certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A

certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial

showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C.

§ 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by

demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that his

constitutional claims are debatable and that any dispositive

procedural rulings by the district court are also debatable or

wrong. See Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336 (2003);

Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee, 252 F.3d

676, 683 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the

record and conclude that Smith has not made the requisite showing.

Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the

appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process. 

DISMISSED
Exhibit 99.2


                               CERTIFICATION UNDER
                       EXCHANGE ACT RULES 13a-14 OR 15d-14

I, Patricia Giuliani-Rheaume, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of clickNsettle.com, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and I have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this annual report is being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this annual
report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

c) presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the
Evaluation Date;

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's board of directors:

a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls
which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's
auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and


<PAGE>


6. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have indicated in this annual
report whether there were significant changes in internal controls or in other
factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date
of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Date: September 24, 2002

                                   /s/ Patricia Giuliani-Rheaume
                                   -------------------------------------------
                                   Patricia Giuliani-Rheaume - Vice President,
                                   Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
#### In the Matter of Dormitory Authority of the State of New York, Appellant, Relative to Acquiring Title to Real Property for Baruch College in the Borough of Manhattan. Milo Press, Inc., Respondent.

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Stanley Parness, J.), entered November 21, 1990, which, *inter alia,*denied petitioner’s motion for partial summary judgment (CPLR 3212), unanimously affirmed, without costs.

*402Petitioner, Dormitory Authority (the "Authority”) acquired title, through a condemnation order, to the building in which claimant leased space and operated a business. Article 3 of claimant’s lease provides: "All fixtures and all paneling, partitions, railings and like installations, installed in the premises at any time, either by Tenant or by Owner on Tenant’s behalf, shall, upon installation, become the property of Owner and shall remain upon and be surrendered with the demised premises”. The same Article also provides: "Nothing in the Article shall be construed to give Owner title to or to prevent Tenant’s removal of trade fixtures, moveable office furniture and equipment”.

Claimant moved from the premises and removed some items with it. Its current Notice of Claim against the Authority demands compensation for the loss of and damages sustained to certain trade fixtures totalling $2,782,590. The Authority has moved for partial summary judgment as to items which total $1,026,012 on the grounds that, these items are not "trade fixtures”, are not still on the premises and that the replacement cost alleged by claimant for the items inappropriately includes sales tax.

We agree with the IAS court that triable issues exist as to the "compensability of the items as business fixtures”. At this juncture, it is unclear as to what constitutes "trade fixtures” under the instant circumstances. As was stated in *J.K.S.P. Rest. v County of Nassau*(127 AD2d 121, 127), "[t]here is no single test to determine when an object is a trade rather than an ordinary fixture, and such determination is generally a mixed question of law and fact.” Here, the intent of the parties cannot be easily determined from the record and must await further examination. *(Cf., Matter of City of New York [G & C Amusements],*55 NY2d 353, 361.)

As to the question of sales tax allowance, whether sales tax is an "expenditure * * * that reasonably and necessarily [is] to be expected” *(Matter of City of New York [Salvation Army],*43 NY2d 512, 516) for the items in question is a triable issue inappropriate for summary judgment under the instant circumstances.

Finally, while the Authority’s appraiser could not locate certain items at the premises on claimant’s list, and thereby argues that claimant should not be compensated for these items, a question remains as to whether the items are actually at the premises. Concur—Murphy, P. J., Wallach, Asch and Smith, JJ.
## R e q u e s t f

o r I n f o r m a t i o n

­ F A

A

­ 2 0 1 5

­ 0 7 0 5

9

­ A W A

­ A V S

­ 3 3 3 E x e m p t i o n s ( F A

A )

S e n t : M o n d a y

, A u g u s t 1 0

, 2 0 1 5 2 : 2 3 P M

T o : I n f o @ G o w d y B r o t h e r s

. c o m ; A n t h o n y @ 3 6 0 d e o r b i t t o u r s

. c o m

D e a r M r

. P a s t o r i z a :

T h i s l e t t e r i s t o i n f o r m y o u t h a t t h e f

o l l o w i n g i n f

o r m a t i o n i s m i s s i n g f r o m y

o u r p e t i t i o n ( D o c k

e t N o

. F A A

− 2 0 1 5

− 0 7 0 5 )

. T h i s i n f o r m a t i o n i s n e c e s s a r y f

o r t h e F e d e r a l A v i a t i o n A d m i n i s t r a t i o n ( F A A ) t o p r o c e s s y o u r p e t i t i o n

.

P r o v i d e a c o p y o f t h e M o t i o n P i c t u r e a n d T e l e v i s i o n O p e r a t i o n s M a n u a l ( M P T O M ) w h i c h i s r e q u i r e d b y O r d e r

8 9 0 0

. 1

, V o l u m e 3

, C h a p t e r 8

, S e c t i o n 1

. I f y o u w i s h f o r u s t o p r o c e e d w i t h o u t t h i s m a n u a l a n d r e m o v e

c l o s e d

‐ s e t f i l m i n g f r o m y

o u r p r o p o s e d o p e r a t i o n p l e a s e i n f o r m o f u s o f y

o u r i n t e n t i o n b y t h e r e q u e s t e d

r e s p o n s e d a t e l i s t e d b e l o w

.

P l e a s e s u b m i t t h e a d d i t i o n a l i n f o r m a t i o n ( n o n

‐ p r o p r i e t a r y ) t o y o u r d o c k e t a t w w w

. r e g u l a t i o n s

. g o v a n d s u b m i t a n y

p r o p r i e t a r y i n f

o r m a t i o n t o t h e F A A H e a d q u a r t e r s o r e l e c t r o n i c a l l y v i a e m a i l t o 3 3 3 e x e m p t i o n s @ f a a

. g o v

. I f y

o u w a n t

u s t o p r o c e s s y

o u r r e q u e s t a n y f u r t h e r

, w e m u s t r e c e i v e t h e i n f o r m a t i o n d e s c r i b e d a b o v

e b y 8 / 2 4 / 2 0 1 5

. I f w e d o n o t

r e c e i v e t h e i n f o r m a t i o n

, w e w i l l c l o s e t h e d o c k e t w i t h o u t n o t i f

y i n g y o u f u r t h e r

.

I f y o u h a v e a n y q u e s t i o n s

, p l e a s e f

e e l f r e e t o c o n t a c t m e a t ( 2 0 2 ) 2 6 7

­ 9 6 7 7

.

S i n c e r e l y

,

D a n N g o

F A A O f f i c e o f R u l e m a k i n g
EX-10.23



 Exhibit 10.23 

AMENDMENT NO. 4 TO 

AMENDED AND RESTATED EXECUTIVE AGREEMENT 

This Amendment No. 4 to Amended and Restated Executive Agreement (the “Amendment”) is effective as of September 23,
2013 and amends that certain Amended and Restated Executive Agreement effective as of June 24, 2008 (the “Original Agreement”), as amended by Amendment No. 1 to Amended and Restated Executive Agreement effective as of
September 25, 2009 (“the “First Amendment”), as further amended by Amendment No. 2 to Amended and Restated Executive Agreement effective as of September April 12, 2010 (“the “Second
Amendment”), as further amended by Amendment No. 3 to Amended and Restated Executive Agreement effective as of November 21, 2011 (“the “Third Amendment”) (the Original Agreement, as amended by the First
Amendment, the Second Amendment and the Third Amendment, the “Agreement”) between Huttig Building Products, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), and Jon Vrabely (the “Executive”). All
capitalized terms used but not defined herein shall have the meanings ascribed to them in the Original Agreement. 
 NOW, THEREFORE, in
consideration of the mutual covenants set forth in this Amendment, the parties hereto agree that the Agreement is amended as follows effective as of the date first above written: 

1. Base Salary Increase. Paragraph 3(a)(i) of the Original Agreement is hereby amended so that, effective for pay periods beginning on and after
September 23, 2013, the Executive’s annual base salary of Three Hundred Sixty Thousand Dollars ($360,000.00) shall be increased by 5% to an annual base salary of Three Hundred Seventy-Eight Thousand Dollars ($378,000.00). 

2. No Effect on Severance Payments. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Executive’s original base salary as set forth in the Original Agreement of
Four Hundred Thousand Dollars ($400,000.00) (or such higher base salary as may be in effect from time to time pursuant to action of the Board) shall be deemed to be his base salary for the purposes of the calculation of any Severance Payment payable
to the Executive pursuant to Paragraph 4(a)(i) of the Original Agreement or any termination payment payable to the Executive pursuant to Paragraph 4(b)(iii)(3) of the Original Agreement. 

3. No Other Changes; Execution in Counterparts. Except as specifically modified by this Amendment, all of the terms and conditions of the Original
Agreement shall continue in full force and effect. This Amendment may be executed in counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original, but of which shall constitute one and the same instrument. 

 

									
	Huttig Building Products, Inc.	 		 		 	EXECUTIVE:
					
	By:	 	 /s/ Robert S. Evans
	 		 		 	 /s/ Jon Vrabely

	Name:	 	Robert S. Evans	 		 		 	Jon Vrabely
	Title:	 	Chairman
Exhibit 32

Certification of CEO and CFO Pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

as Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the
quarterly report on Form 10-Q of TPG Specialty Lending, Inc. (the Company) for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2012, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), Michael
Fishman, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and John Viola, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to
such officers knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                    |  |                        
|------------------- |  | -----------------------
|/s/ Michael Fishman
|Name:               |  | Michael Fishman        
|Title:              |  | Chief Executive Officer
|Date:               |  | August 13, 2012        
|                   
|/s/ John E. Viola  
|Name:               |  | John E. Viola          
|Title:              |  | Chief Financial Officer
|Date:               |  | August 13, 2012        

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350 and is not being
filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLAImages

# DLA Images

Search

Search

                                  - All Images 
                                  - Other 

                                  - Upload Date
                                  - Photo Date
                                  - Title

Share

----

Download Image: Small ()Medium ()Full Size (0.02 MB)

Tags:DLA Distribution, Defense Logistics Agency Distribution, dla, Naval Supply Systems Command, Jane McMullen, senior executive service, Defense Logistics Agency

Photo by:VIRIN: 

Photo Gallery
Order entered January 4. 2021

In the

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-19-00851-CR

DESMOND RENARD FISHER, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 7

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. F19-00024-Y

ORDER

Before the Court is appellant’s December 29, 2020 motion for an extension 

of time to file his brief. We GRANT the motion and ORDER appellant’s brief due 

by January 27, 2021.

/s/ CORY L. CARLYLE 

JUSTICE