alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT 13.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

**PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS**

**ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Annual Report of Embotelladora Andina S.A (the “Company”) on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015, as filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Miguel Ángel Peirano, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)                  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)                  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| /s/MIGUEL ÁNGEL PEIRANO |   |
|------------------------------|--------|
| Miguel Ángel Peirano    |   |
| Chief Executive Officer      |   |
| Embotelladora Andina S.A.    |   |
| Dated: April 28,   2016 |   |

 

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

----
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLAImages

# DLA Images

Search

Search

                                  - All Images 
                                  - Other 

                                  - Upload Date
                                  - Photo Date
                                  - Title

Share

----

Download Image: Small ()Medium ()Full Size (0.14 MB)

Tags:Defense Logistics Agency Energy, dla, DLA Energy , Defense Logistics Agency

Photo by:VIRIN: 

Photo Gallery
#### David ADKINS v. STATE.

4 Div. 198.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

Dec. 11, 1973.

After Remandment

CATES, Presiding Judge.

The sale alleged in the indictment was consummated, according to the tendencies of the State’s proof, by (1) the undercover agent’s giving Adkins four dollars (2) Adkins told the agent to go out and look in a certain car where he would find marijuana in a plastic bag. Apparently the agent was put on the honor system, because Adkins only sold the agent about half of the contents of the bag. Mirabile dictu, the agent, too, was honorable.

Adkins’ version was quite variant. First, there was no marijuana. Second, the agent was pestering Adkins and his brother, asking about grass and drugs. The four dollars was left on a table in a night club, the agent asking Adkins to take the money to buy marijuana if he came across any. Before Adkins could tell the agent, “No,” he was gone.

The jury’s verdict obviously accorded credibility to the tendencies of the State’s evidence. We cannot as a matter of law say that the verdict was erroneous.

We pretermit speculation as to what the Supreme Court’s decision presages in the area of pre-trial discovery. See Heflin, C. J., dissenting.

We have examined the entire record and consider that no erroneous adverse ruling appears therein. The judgment below is, therefore,

Affirmed.

All the Judges concur.
#### Kennedy v. Gauli et al.

1. Mechanic’s Lien: practice in the supreme court: trial. While an action to enforce a mechanic’s lien is to be prosecuted by equitable proceedings, yet if no motion nor order is made that the testimony be reduced to writing, the ease is not triable *de novo*in the Supreme Court.

*Appeal from Clayton Circuit Court.*

Monday, October 23.

This suit was brought to recover for mason-work in building a stone church. The petition asks for the establishment of a mechanic’s lien. It was claimed by the defendants that the work was unskillfully done. There was judgment for the plaintiff; defendants appeal.

*Satnuel*Murdoch, for appellants.

*J. O. Crosby*and *8. K.*Adams, for appellee.

Adams, J.

i..mechanic’s in'tiie1^-106 preme Court: trial. I. A question is raised in this case as to whether it is triable *de novo.*An action to enforce a mechanic’s lien is to be prosecuted by equitable proceedings. Code, section 2510. Either party had . , , ,. . , . 1 . , a right to move for a trial on written evidence. *Sherwood v. Sherwood, ante,*p. 192. Neither party, however, did so move, nor was any order made that the testimony be reduced to writing. We think that the case is not triable *de novo. Walker v. Plummer,*41 Iowa, 677; *Hammersham v. Fairall, ante,*p. 462.

II. The structure is evidently defective. Whether the defects are attributable to the unskillfulness of the plaintiff, or to circumstances which he could not control, the evidence does not clearly show. On this point there is conflict. We are of the opinion, therefore, that the decree of the Circuit Court must be

Affirmed.
Exhibit 11

               CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS


We have issued our report dated August 28, 2002, accompanying the consolidated
financial statements included in the Annual Report of clickNsettle.com, Inc. and
Subsidiaries on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2002. We hereby
consent to the incorporation by reference of said report in the Registration
Statement of clickNsettle.com, Inc. and Subsidiaries on Form S-8 (File No.
33-73402, effective November 15, 2001).


/s/GRANT THORNTON LLP


Melville, New York
August 28, 2002
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-21-00609-CR

Ronald Rudolph Rodriguez, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

FROM THE 207TH DISTRICT COURT OF COMAL COUNTY

NO. CR2015-395, THE HONORABLE R. BRUCE BOYER, JUDGE PRESIDING

O R D E R A N D M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

PER CURIAM

Appellant’s brief was originally due April 29, 2022. On May 9, 2022, this Court 

sent a notice to appellant informing him that his brief was overdue and that a failure to file a 

satisfactory response by May 19, 2022, would result in the referral of this case to the trial 

court for a hearing under Rule 38.8(b) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. To date, no 

appellant’s brief has been filed.

The appeal is abated and remanded to the trial court. The trial court shall conduct 

a hearing to determine whether appellant desires to prosecute this appeal and, if so, whether 

counsel has abandoned this appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(b)(2), (3). The court shall make 

appropriate written findings and recommendations. See id. If necessary, the court shall appoint 

substitute counsel who will effectively represent appellant in this appeal. Following the hearing, 

which shall be transcribed, the trial court shall order the appropriate supplemental clerk’s and 
2

reporter’s records—including all findings and orders—to be prepared and forwarded to this 

Court no later than July 8, 2022. See id. R. 38.8(b)(3).

It is so ordered June 7, 2022.

Before Justices Goodwin, Baker, and Triana

Abated and Remanded

Filed: June 7, 2022

Do Not Publish
Board of Directors Meeting 

Wednesday, March 8, 2023 

This event is closed to the public 

Information summaries for the below listed projects can be found on dfc.gov 

Meeting Agenda 

 

I. CHAIRMAN OPENS MEETING 

II. PROJECT APPROVALS

a. ISQ Climate Fund – Global 

b. Akbank T.A.S. – Turkey 

 

 

III. ADMINISTRATIVE APPROVALS 

IV. RISK COMMITTEE REPORT 

V. PRESENTATIONS

a. Market Mapping 

 

b. Sub-Board Aggregate Statistics: FY22 

Location: Meeting will be held in a hybrid virtual/in-person environment
#### In the Matter of Rosemarie Saladino, Appellant, v Cesar A. Perales, as Commissioner of the New York State Department of Social Services, et al., Respondents.

In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to compel the respondents to comply with a Decision After Fair Hearing dated September 3, 1986, and to recompute the petitioner’s food stamps authorization for a specified period, the petitioner appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Smith, J.), entered August 31, 1989, which dismissed the proceeding.

Ordered that the judgment is reversed, on the law, with one bill of costs, and the petition is granted to the extent that the respondent Commissioner of the New York City Department of Social Services is directed to (1) comply with the Decision After Fair Hearing issued by Cesar Perales on September 3, *8421986, (2) render an accounting to the petitioner of the exact amount of food stamps to which she is entitled, and (3) issue her the food stamps to which she is entitled.

The record indicates that all of the documentation necessary to recalculate the petitioner’s food stamp benefits in accordance with the Decision After Fair Hearing are available in the files of the Department of Social Services of the City of New York. This being the case, there is no reason for the delay in complying with the Decision After Fair Hearing.

With respect to the petitioner’s claim for attorneys’ fees, her cause of action merely concerns the respondents’ failure to abide by a State regulation with respect to requiring social service officials to promptly comply with directives set forth in the Decision After Fair Hearing *(see,*18 NYCRR former 358.22). There was no showing by the petitioner of a violation of any constitutional right, or the violation by the State of any right created by Federal law *(see, Matter of Williams v D’Elia,*119 AD2d 678). Accordingly, the petitioner failed to raise a bona fide civil rights claim pursuant to 42 USC § 1988 so as to entitle her to an award of attorneys’ fees *(see, Matter of Middleton v Perales,*160 AD2d 800; *Matter of Kross v Perales,*156 AD2d 451; *Matter of Rozier v Perales,*149 AD2d 710; *Matter of Gelin v Perales,*149 AD2d 593). Bracken, J. P., Sullivan, Miller and Ritter, JJ., concur.
#### People v William Davis.

Upon the Court’s own motion, its order entered on November 14, 1989 (155 AD2d 286) vacated, in its entirety; poor-person relief previously granted is continued, counsel to serve brief on defendant’s appeal from order of August 1, 1988 on or before July 15, 1991, with his brief on defendant’s appeal from the judgment to remain in effect, the appeals, sua sponte, consolidated for the October 1991 Term, and defendant permitted to file supplemental pro se brief for said Term, all as indicated. Concur—Carro, J. P., Kupferman, Ross, Asch and Smith, JJ.
Exhibit32

 

                      CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO

                        18U.S.C. SECTION 1350

                        ASADOPTED PURSUANT TO

               SECTION906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of USChina Venture IIInc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commissionon the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned, Chief Executive Officer & Chief Financial Officer, certifiespursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:

 

   1. The report fully complies with the requirementsof Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

   2. The information contained in the Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 

 

 Date:  July 7, 2011                  By:/s/ Andrew Chien

                                       -------------------------------

                                       AndrewChien, CEO and CFO
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NOS. 02-11-00300-CR

 02-11-00301-CR

MARK TIMOTHY GOMEZ APPELLANT

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS STATE

------------

FROM COUNTY CRIMINAL COURT NO. 1 OF DENTON COUNTY

------------

MEMORANDUM OPINION1 AND JUDGMENT

----------

We have considered appellant’s “Motion To Dismiss Appeal.” The motion 

complies with rule 42.2(a) of the rules of appellate procedure. Tex. R. App. P.

42.2(a). No decision of this court having been delivered before we received this 

motion, we grant the motion and dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P.

42.2(a), 43.2(f).

 

1See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.
2

PER CURIAM

PANEL: DAUPHINOT, J.; LIVINGSTON, C.J.; and WALKER, J.

DO NOT PUBLISH

Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b)

DELIVERED: December 15, 2011
Exhibit 32.1


                                 CERTIFICATION

In connection with the annual report of Movie Gallery, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form l0-K for the year ended December 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, J. T. Malugen,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my
knowledge:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company
     as of and for the periods covered in the report.


Date:  March 16, 2007


/s/  J. T. Malugen
------------------------------------
Name:  J. T. Malugen
Its:  Chief Executive Officer
VI 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 580 

For the relief of Maha Dakar. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 14, 2013 

Mr. BROWN introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

For the relief of Maha Dakar. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. ADJUSTMENT OF STATUS. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding any other provi5 sion of law, for the purposes of the Immigration and Na6 tionality Act (8 U.S.C. 1101 et seq.), Maha Dakar shall 

7 be deemed to have been lawfully admitted to, and re8 mained in, the United States, and shall be eligible for ad9 justment of status to that of an alien lawfully admitted 

10 for permanent residence under section 245 of the Immi11 gration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1255) upon filing 

12 an application for such adjustment of status. 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 580 IS

1 (b) APPLICATION AND PAYMENT OF FEES.—Sub2 section (a) shall apply only if Maha Dakar files an applica3 tion for adjustment of status, with appropriate fees, not 

4 later than 2 years after the date of the enactment of this 

5 Act. 

6 (c) REDUCTION OF IMMIGRANT VISA NUMBERS.— 

7 Upon the granting of permanent resident status to Maha 

8 Dakar, the Secretary of State shall instruct the proper of9 ficer to reduce by 1, during the current or subsequent fis10 cal year, the total number of immigrant visas that are 

11 made available to natives of the country of the birth of 

12 Maha Dakar under section 202(a)(2) of the Immigration 

13 and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1152(a)(2)). 

Æ 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
SCOTTIE D. LOWE

,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

,

Appellee

. IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D 13

- 4567

________ _____________________/

Opinion filed May 5, 2015.

An appeal from an order of the Circuit Court for Leon County

. James C. Hankinson , Judge

.

Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender, and Steven L. Seliger and Joel Arnold,

Assistant Public Defender s , Tallahassee

, for Appellant; Scottie D. Lowe, pro se,

Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee

.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

WOLF, ROWE, and SWANSON, JJ., CONCUR.
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 170 (Friday, August 31, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Page 44681]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-19129]



[[Page 44681]]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

OVERSEAS PRIVATE INVESTMENT CORPORATION


Sunshine Act Meetings

FEDERAL REGISTER CITATION OF PREVIOUS ANNOUNCEMENT: 83 FR 40095.

PREVIOUSLY ANNOUNCED TIME AND DATE OF THE MEETING: 1 p.m., September 5, 
2018.

CHANGES IN THE MEETING: OPIC's Sunshine Act notice of its Public 
Hearing in Conjunction with each Board meeting was published in the 
Federal Register (Volume 83, Number 156, Pages 40095-40096) on Monday, 
August 13, 2018. No requests were received to provide testimony or 
submit written statements for the record; therefore, OPIC's public 
hearing scheduled for 1 p.m., September 5, 2018, in conjunction with 
OPIC's September 13, 2018, Board of Directors meeting has been 
cancelled.

CONTACT PERSON FOR INFORMATION: Information on the hearing cancellation 
may be obtained from Catherine F.I. Andrade at (202) 336-8768, or via 
email at <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#1e5d7f6a767b6c77707b305f707a6c7f7a7b5e716e777d30797168"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="97d4f6e3fff2e5fef9f2b9d6f9f3e5f6f3f2d7f8e7fef4b9f0f8e1">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Dated: August 29, 2018.
Catherine F.I. Andrade,
OPIC Corporate Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2018-19129 Filed 8-29-18; 4:15 pm]
 BILLING CODE 3210-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 611 

AN ACT 

To make a technical amendment to the T’uf Shur Bien 

Preservation Trust Area Act, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

†S 611 ES

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Sandia Pueblo Settle3 ment Technical Amendment Act’’. 

4 SEC. 2. SANDIA PUEBLO SETTLEMENT TECHNICAL AMEND5 MENT. 

6 Section 413(b) of the T’uf Shur Bien Preservation 

7 Trust Area Act (16 U.S.C. 539m–11(b)) is amended— 

8 (1) in the first sentence of paragraph (4), by 

9 striking ‘‘conveyance’’ and inserting ‘‘title to be con10 veyed’’; and 

11 (2) by adding at the end the following: 

12 ‘‘(6) FAILURE TO EXCHANGE.— 

13 ‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—If the land exchange 

14 authorized under paragraph (1) is not com15 pleted by the date that is 30 days after the date 

16 of enactment of this paragraph, the Secretary, 

17 on request of the Pueblo and the Secretary of 

18 the Interior, shall transfer the National Forest 

19 land generally depicted as ‘Land to be Held in 

20 Trust’ on the map entitled ‘Sandia Pueblo Set21 tlement Technical Amendment Act’ and dated 

22 October 18, 2013, to the Secretary of the Inte23 rior to be held in trust by the United States for 

24 the Pueblo— 

25 ‘‘(i) subject to the restriction enforced 

26 by the Secretary of the Interior that the 
3 

†S 611 ES

1 land remain undeveloped, with the natural 

2 characteristics of the land to be preserved 

3 in perpetuity; and 

4 ‘‘(ii) consistent with subsection (c). 

5 ‘‘(B) OTHER TRANSFERS.—After the 

6 transfer under subparagraph (A) is complete, 

7 the Secretary of the Interior, with the consent 

8 of the Pueblo, shall— 

9 ‘‘(i) transfer to the Secretary, con10 sistent with section 411(c)— 

11 ‘‘(I) the La Luz tract generally 

12 depicted on the map entitled ‘Sandia 

13 Pueblo Settlement Technical Amend14 ment Act’ and dated October 18, 

15 2013; and 

16 ‘‘(II) the conservation easement 

17 for the Piedra Lisa tract generally de18 picted on the map entitled ‘Sandia 

19 Pueblo Settlement Technical Amend20 ment Act’ and dated October 18, 

21 2013; and 

22 ‘‘(ii) grant to the Secretary a right-of23 way for the Piedra Lisa Trail within the 

24 Piedra Lisa tract generally depicted on the 

25 map entitled ‘Sandia Pueblo Settlement 
4 

†S 611 ES

1 Technical Amendment Act’ and dated Oc2 tober 18, 2013.’’. 

Passed the Senate March 12, 2014. 

Attest: 

Secretary. 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 611 

AN ACT 

To make a technical amendment to the T’uf Shur 

purposes. Bien Preservation Trust Area Act, and for other
Order issued May 29, 2013.

In The

Court of Appeals 

For The 

First District of Texas 

————————————

NO. 01-13-00421-CV

———————————

IN RE JULIE NICOLE VIRGIN AND GREG ENOS, Relators

Original Proceeding on Petition for Writ of Mandamus

ORDER1

Lance Whitworth, the real party in interest, has requested that we abate the 

mandamus to allow for consideration of the challenged rulings by the successor 

judge. He indicates that his motion is unopposed and certifies that he conferred 

with all of the parties to the case, including the Attorney General and the relators,

Julie Nicole Virgin and Greg Enos. 

 

1

The underlying case is In re K.V., cause number 07FD2250, pending in the County 

Court at Law No. 3 of Galveston County, Texas, the Hon. Christopher Dupuy 

presiding.
2

Based on the foregoing, we abate this mandamus proceeding until May 31, 

2013 and order that the relators and the real party in interest provide this Court 

with a status report by 5:00 P.M. on that date. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Jane Bland

Justice

Panel consists of Justices Keyes, Higley, and Bland.