Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 174 / Friday, September 7, 2018 / Notices 45417 

17See Antidumping Proceedings: Calculation of 

the Weighted-Average Dumping Margin and 

Assessment Rate in Certain Antidumping 

Proceedings: Final Modification, 77 FR 8101, 8102 

(February 14, 2012) (Final Modification for 

Reviews). 

18See Large Power Transformers from the 

Republic of Korea: Antidumping Duty Order, 77 FR 

53177 (August 31, 2012). 

19See Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 

Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 68 

FR 23954 (May 6, 2003) (Assessment Policy Notice). 

20See Large Power Transformers from the 

Republic of Korea: Antidumping Duty Order, 77 FR 

53177 (August 31, 2012). 

sales made during the period of review 

to each importer to the total entered 

value of those same sales in accordance 

with 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1). If the 

respondent has not reported reliable 

entered values, we will calculate a perunit assessment rate for each importer 

by dividing the total amount of 

dumping for the examined sales made 

during the period of review to that 

importer by the total sales quantity 

associated with those transactions. 

Where an importer-specific ad valorem 

assessment rate is zero or de minimis, 

we will instruct CBP to liquidate the 

appropriate entries without regard to 

antidumping duties in accordance with 

19 CFR 351.106(c)(2). If the 

respondent’s weighted-average dumping 

margin is zero or de minimis in the final 

results of review, we will instruct CBP 

not to assess duties on any of its entries 

in accordance with the Final 

Modification for Reviews, i.e., ‘‘{w}here 

the weighted-average margin of 

dumping for the exporter is determined 

to be zero or de minimis, no 

antidumping duties will be assessed.’’ 17

If the preliminary results are 

unchanged for the final results, we will 

instruct CBP to apply an ad valorem 

assessment rate of 60.81 percent to all 

entries of subject merchandise during 

the period of review which were 

produced and/or exported by Hyundai. 

Regarding entries of subject 

merchandise during the period of 

review that were produced by Hyosung 

and Hyundai and for which they did not 

know that the merchandise was 

destined for the United States, we will 

instruct CBP to liquidate un-reviewed 

entries at the all-others rate of 22.00 

percent, as established in the less-thanfair-value investigation of the order, if 

there is no rate for the intermediate 

company(ies) involved in the 

transaction.18 For a full discussion of 

this matter, see Assessment Policy 

Notice.19

We intend to issue liquidation 

instructions to CBP 15 days after 

publication of the final results of this 

review. 

Cash Deposit Requirements 

The following cash deposit 

requirements will be effective upon 

publication of the final results of this 

administrative review for all shipments 

of the subject merchandise entered, or 

withdrawn from warehouse, for 

consumption on or after the publication 

date of the final results of this 

administrative review, as provided by 

section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) The 

cash deposit rate for Hyosung and 

Hyundai and other companies listed 

above will be equal to the weightedaverage dumping margin established in 

the final results of this administrative 

review; (2) for previously reviewed or 

investigated companies not listed above, 

the cash deposit rate will continue to be 

the company-specific rate published for 

the most recently completed segment of 

this proceeding in which they were 

reviewed; (3) if the exporter is not a firm 

covered in this review, a prior review, 

or in the investigation but the producer 

is, the cash deposit rate will be the rate 

established for the most recently 

completed segment of this proceeding 

for the producer of the merchandise; 

and (4) the cash deposit rate for all other 

producers or exporters will continue to 

be the all-others rate of 22.00 percent, 

the rate established in the investigation 

of this proceeding.20 These cash deposit 

requirements, when imposed, shall 

remain in effect until further notice. 

Notification to Importers 

This notice also serves as a reminder 

to importers of their responsibility 

under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a 

certificate regarding the reimbursement 

of antidumping duties prior to 

liquidation of the relevant entries 

during this review period. Failure to 

comply with this requirement could 

result in Commerce’s presumption that 

reimbursement of antidumping duties 

occurred and the subsequent assessment 

of double antidumping duties. 

Notification to Interested Parties 

We are issuing and publishing this 

notice in accordance with sections 

751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act. 

Dated: August 31, 2018. 

Gary Taverman, 

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping 

and Countervailing Duty Operations, 

performing the non-exclusive functions and 

duties of the Assistant Secretary for 

Enforcement and Compliance. 

Appendix—List of Topics Discussed in 

the Preliminary Decision Memorandum 

I. Summary 

II. Background 

III. Deadline for Submission of Updated Sales 

and Cost Information 

IV. Scope of the Order 

V. Discussion of the Methodology 

A. Determination of Comparison Method 

B. Results of the Differential Pricing 

Analysis 

C. Home Market Viability as Comparison 

Market 

D. Level of Trade 

E. Cost of Production 

F. Calculation of Normal Value Based on 

Comparison Market Prices 

G. Price-to-Constructed Value Comparison 

VI. Application of Facts Available and Use of 

Adverse Inference 

A. Application of Facts Available 

B. Use of Adverse Inference 

C. Selection and Corroboration of the 

Adverse Facts Available Rate 

VII. Discussion of The Issues 

A. Hyundai-Specific Issues 

VIII. Rate for Non-Selected Companies 

IX. Parts 

X. Recommendation 

[FR Doc. 2018–19428 Filed 9–6–18; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–570–010] 

Certain Crystalline Silicon Photovoltaic 

Products From the People’s Republic 

of China: Notice of Partial Rescission 

of Antidumping Duty Administrative 

Review; 2017–2018 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce 

(Commerce) is rescinding, in part, the 

administrative review of the 

antidumping duty (AD) order on certain 

crystalline silicon photovoltaic products 

from the People’s Republic of China 

(China) for the period of review (POR), 

February 1, 2017, through January 31, 

2018. 

DATES: Applicable September 7, 2018. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jeff 

Pedersen, AD/CVD Operations, Office 

IV, Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 

Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, 

DC 20230, telephone: (202) 482–2769. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On February 1, 2018, Commerce 

published in the Federal Register, a 

notice of opportunity to request an 

administrative review of the AD order 

on certain crystalline silicon 

photovoltaic products from China (the 

Order) covering the period February 1, 


daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with NOTICES
45418 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 174 / Friday, September 7, 2018 / Notices 

1See Antidumping or Countervailing Duty Order, 

Finding, or Suspended Investigation; Opportunity 

To Request Administrative Review, 83 FR 4639 

(February 1, 2018). 

2See Initiation of Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews, 83 FR 

16298 (April 16, 2018) (Initiation Notice). 

3See Appendix. As stated in Change in Practice 

in NME Reviews, Commerce will no longer consider 

the non-market economy (NME) entity as an 

exporter conditionally subject to administrative 

reviews. See Antidumping Proceedings: 

Announcement of Change in Department Practice 

for Respondent Selection in Antidumping Duty 

Proceedings and Conditional Review of the 

Nonmarket Economy Entity in NME Antidumping 

Duty Proceedings, 78 FR 65963 (November 4, 2013). 

The China-wide entity is not subject to this 

administrative review because no interested party 

requested a review of the entity. See Initiation 

Notice. 

1See Multilayered Wood Flooring from the 

People’s Republic of China: Final Results of 

Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, Final 

Determination of No Shipments, and Partial 

Rescission; 2015–2016, 83 FR 35461 (July 26, 2018) 

(Final Results). 

2See Changzhou Hawd Flooring Co., et al. v. 

United States, Ct. No. 12–20, Slip Op. 18–82 (Court 

of Int’l Trade July 3, 2018); see also Changzhou 

Hawd Flooring Co., et al. v. United States, Ct. No. 

12–20, Dkt. No. 199 (Court of Int’l Trade Aug. 15, 

2018). 

2017, through January 31, 2018.1

Commerce received multiple timely 

requests for an administrative review of 

the Order. On April 16, 2018, in 

accordance with section 751(a) of Tariff 

Act of 1930, as amended (the Act) and 

19 CFR 351.221(c)(1)(i), Commerce 

published in the Federal Register a 

notice initiating an administrative 

review of the Order with respect to 12 

companies or groups of companies 

covering the period February 1, 2017, 

through January 31, 2018.2 All 

requesting parties subsequently timely 

withdrew their requests to review the 

nine companies listed in the Appendix 

to this notice. 

Rescission of Review, in Part 

Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.213(d)(1), 

Commerce will rescind an 

administrative review, in whole or in 

part, if the parties that requested the 

review withdraw their requests within 

90 days of the date of publication of the 

notice of initiation of the requested 

review. All requesting parties withdrew 

their respective requests for an 

administrative review of the nine 

companies or group of companies listed 

in the Appendix to this notice within 90 

days of the date of publication of the 

Initiation Notice. Accordingly, 

Commerce is rescinding this review 

with respect to these companies in 

accordance with 19 CFR 351.213(d)(1).3

The administrative review will continue 

with respect to all other firms for which 

a review was requested and initiated. 

Assessment 

Commerce will instruct U.S. Customs 

and Border Protection (CBP) to assess 

antidumping duties on all subject 

merchandise exported by the companies 

listed in the Appendix to this notice 

that was entered, or withdrawn from 

warehouse, for consumption during the 

period of review. The entries shall be 

assessed AD duties that are equal to the 

cash deposit of estimated AD duties 

required at the time of entry, or 

withdrawal from warehouse, for 

consumption, in accordance with 19 

CFR 351.212(c)(1)(i). Commerce intends 

to issue appropriate assessment 

instructions to CBP 15 days after 

publication of this notice in the Federal 

Register. 

Notification to Importers 

This notice serves as the only 

reminder to importers whose entries 

will be liquidated as a result of this 

rescission notice, of their responsibility 

under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a 

certificate regarding the reimbursement 

of AD duties prior to liquidation of the 

relevant entries during this review 

period. Failure to comply with this 

requirement could result in the 

presumption that reimbursement of the 

AD duties occurred and the subsequent 

assessment of doubled AD duties. 

Notification Regarding Administrative 

Protective Orders 

This notice also serves as a reminder 

to parties subject to administrative 

protective order (APO) of their 

responsibility concerning the 

disposition of proprietary information 

disclosed under an APO in accordance 

with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3), which 

continues to govern business 

proprietary information in this segment 

of the proceeding. Timely written 

notification of the return or destruction 

of APO materials, or conversion to 

judicial protective order, is hereby 

requested. Failure to comply with the 

regulations and terms of an APO is a 

sanctionable violation. 

This notice is issued and published in 

accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 

777(i)(1) of the Act, and 19 CFR 

351.213(d)(4). 

Dated: August 31, 2018. 

James Maeder, 

Associate Deputy Assistant Secretary for 

Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 

Operations performing the duties of Deputy 

Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Operations. 

Appendix 

• BYD (Shangluo) Industrial Co., Ltd. 

• Changzhou Trina Solar Energy Co., Ltd./ 

Trina Solar (Changzhou) Science and 

Technology Co., Ltd./Yangcheng Trina 

Solar Energy Co., Ltd./Turpan Trina Solar 

Energy Co., Ltd./Hubei Trina Solar Energy 

Co., Ltd. 

• Chint Solar (Zhejiang) Co., Ltd. 

• Hefei JA Solar Technology Co., Ltd. 

• Perlight Solar Co., Ltd. 

• Shanghai BYD Co., Ltd. 

• Shenzhen Letsolar Technology Co., Ltd. 

• Sunny Apex Development Ltd. 

• Wuxi Suntech Power Co., Ltd. 

[FR Doc. 2018–19427 Filed 9–6–18; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–570–970] 

Multilayered Wood Flooring From the 

People’s Republic of China: Correction 

to the Final Results of Antidumping 

Duty Administrative Review; 2015– 

2016 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

DATES: Applicable September 7, 2018. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Michael Bowen, AD/CVD Operations, 

Office VIII, Enforcement and 

Compliance, International Trade 

Administration, U.S. Department of 

Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue 

NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: 

202–482–0768. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On July 

26, 2018, the Department of Commerce 

(Commerce) published the Final Results 

of the 2015–2016 administrative review 

of the antidumping duty order on 

multilayered wood flooring from the 

People’s Republic of China (China).1

The period of review (POR) is December 

1, 2015, through November 30, 2016. 

Commerce is issuing this notice to 

correct a ministerial error in the Final 

Results, and to amend the partial 

rescission of certain companies from the 

administrative review to include Double 

F Limited. Specifically, in the Final 

Results, Commerce inadvertently 

misspelled Dalian Guhua Wooden 

Product Co., Ltd.’s name as Dalian 

Guhua Wood Product Co., Ltd. 

Commerce corrected this error in the 

cash deposit and liquidation 

instructions issued to U.S. Customs and 

Border Protection following the 

publication of the Final Results. 

Further, in accordance with the Court of 

International Trade’s August 15, 2018, 

order amending the Court’s July 3, 2018, 

judgment in Changzhou Hawd Flooring 

Co., Ltd., et al. v. United States,2 we 


daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with NOTICES