alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### D. LEWIS, d/b/a Lewis Plasterers, Milton Construction Company, d/b/a Miami Modern Homes and National Union Fire Insurance Company, Petitioners, v. Edward MUNDY and the Florida Industrial Commission, Respondents. LEWIS PLASTERERS and Milton Construction Company, Petitioners, v. Edward MUNDY, Respondent.

Nos. 38021, 38031.

Supremo Court of Florida.

Feb. 19, 1969.

Alfred D. Bieley for D. Lewis, and Highsmith & Ezzo and James O. Nelson, Miami, for Milton Construction Co., petitioners.

L. Bary Keyfetz, of Ser, Greenspahn, Keyfetz & Gallagher, Miami, Patrick H. Mears and J. Franklin Garner, Tallahassee, for respondents.

*36PER CURIAM.

The above-styled matters are before us on petition for writ of certiorari to review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission dated October 16, 1968, affirming an order of a judge of industrial claims dated November IS, 1967, which awarded certain workmen’s compensation benefits to respondent Mundy.

Respondent has moved to dismiss the petition of Lewis because when he sought review by the respondent Commission he did not comply with the appeal bond requirements of Fla.Stat. § 440.25(4) (a) (1967), F.S.A., although at the time he was an uninsured employer.

Respondent has moved to dismiss the petition of Milton because its application for review was filed with respondent Commission too late under the cited statute.

We have considered both petitions on the record and supporting briefs. We find that further argument would serve no useful purpose and it is, therefore, dispensed with pursuant to Fla.App.Rule 3.10, subd. e, 32 F.S.A. Our consideration of the matter leads us to conclude that the order under review is supported by competent, substantial evidence and further that there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of the law.

Our view on the merits makes it unnecessary to pass on the motions to dismiss which have become moot.

Respondent Mundy’s application for an attorney’s fee is granted in the amount of $350.00.

The petitions for certiorari are denied.

It is so ordered.

ERVIN, C. J., and ROBERTS, DREW, THORN AL and CALDWELL (Retired), JJ., concur.
Exhibit 10.18(j)








Exhibit 10.18(j)
AMENDMENT No 10 TO LETTER OF AGREEMENT DCT-026/2003












This Amendment No. 10 to Letter of Agreement DCT-026/2003, dated as of November 18th, 2010 (“Amendment 10”) relates to Letter Agreement DCT-026/2003 between Embraer - Empresa Brasileira de Aeronáutica S.A. (“Embraer”) and JetBlue Airways Corporation (“Buyer”) dated June 9, 2003 as amended from time to time (collectively referred to herein as “Letter Agreement”).  This Amendment 10 is between Embraer and Buyer, collectively referred to herein as the “Parties”.
This Amendment 10 sets forth further agreements between Embraer and Buyer.  All capitalized terms used in this Amendment 10 and not defined herein, shall have the meaning given in the Purchase Agreement, and in case of any conflict between this Amendment 10, the Letter Agreement, the terms of this Amendment 10 shall control.
Now, therefore, for good and valuable consideration, which is hereby acknowledged, Embraer and Buyer hereby agree as follows:
1. [***]


Pursuant to Amendment No. 4 to Letter of Agreement DCT-026/2003, dated as of October 17, 2007 (“Amendment 4”), Embraer [***]. The Parties hereto shall [***].
All other terms and conditions of the Letter Agreement, which are not specifically amended by this Amendment 10, shall remain in full force and effect without any change.
[Signature page follows]




____________________
[***]    Represents material which has been redacted and filed separately with the Commission pursuant to a request for confidential treatment pursuant to Rule 24b-2 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
		
	Amendment No 10 to the Letter Agreement DCT-026/2003
	Page 1 of 2


COM0293-10











Exhibit 10.18(j)
AMENDMENT No 10 TO LETTER OF AGREEMENT DCT-026/2003


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Embraer and Buyer, by their duly authorized officers, have entered into and executed this Amendment 10 to the Letter Agreement to be effective as of the date first written above.
	
		
	Embraer S.A.
By:/s/ Flávio Rímoli
Name:Flávio Rímoli
Title:Executive Vice President & 
General Counsel
	JetBlue Airways Corporation
By:/s/ Mark D. Powers
Name:Mark D. Powers
Title:SVP Treasurer

	By:/s/ José Luis D’Avila Molina
Name:José Luis D’Avila Molina
Title:Vice President, Contracts 
Airline Market
	 

	Date:Nov. 18, 2010
Place:São José dos Campos - S
Witness:/s/ Fernando Bueno
Name:Fernando Bueno
	Date:12/2/10
Place:Forest Hills, NY
Witness:/s/ Ryan Schroeter
Name:Ryan Schroeter




































		
	Amendment No 10 to the Letter Agreement DCT-026/2003
	Page 1 of 2


COM0293-10
**
**EXHIBIT 32.3**

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**

**PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)**

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2020 (the “Report”) of Solar Senior Capital Ltd. (the “Registrant”), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, RICHARD L.PETEKA, the Chief Financial Officer of the Registrant, hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge, that: 

(1) The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and 

(2) Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant. 

 
  
/S/ RICHARD L. PETEKA
**Name:** **Richard L. Peteka****Date:** **August 4, 2020****
p. 1



# OAR Box 1828 Prepped byOllie Stewart



## Document

Number: 

# 113 ) ll-K-(B)-10 2 Docket Number: 

# A-83-2 7

Printed 11/12/200811:12:52 AM Sheet 113 of 325P. 2 

# A-83-27 ENERGYAN D ENVIRONMENTA L ANALYSIS , INC . II-K-(B)-10 2

Apri l 6 , 198 3

Ms . Jud i Greenwal d Offic e o f Polic yAnalysi s (PM-220 ) U.S . Environmenta l Protectio n Agenc y 40 1 MStreet , S.W . Washington , D.C . 2046 1 Subject : 199 5 Projecte d Coa l Demand i n Ne wIndustria l Boiler s

fo r Basecas e an

d 1. 0 lb/MMBt u S O NSP S Dea r Judi : Attached , a s requested , ar e projecte d 199 5 coa l demand fo r ne windus

tria l boiler s unde r a basecas e an d a 1. 0 lb/MMBt u S0 2 NSPS . Thes e IFCA M result s ar e frompreviou s mode l run s i n Augus t 1981 , whic hi s th e mos t recen t analysi s o f a n S0 ? standard . I hop e tha t thi s informatio n satisfie s you r need , i f yo u hav e an

yquestions . Pleas e giv e m e a cal l Respectfull yyours ,

Kar l F . Hel d KFH:m k Attachmen t cc : Rober t Shor t (EPA ) A l Weh e (EPA )TABL E 1 199 5 PROJECTE D COAL DEMAND I NNE WINDUSTRIAL BOILER S 1/2 /

1 . 2 . 3 . 4 . 5 . 6 . 7 . 8 . 9 . 10 . Ne wEngland Ne wYork/Ne wJersey Middl e Atlanti c Sout hAtlanti c Midwes t Southwes t Centra l Nort hCentra l Wes t Northwes t TOTAL Lo w ( < 1 sulfu r coa l

. 2 l bSO, ) 5 0 0 16 0 2,41 0 42 0 76 0 0 55 0 24 0 23 0 4,82 0 (10 3 tons )

Bas e Cas e Hig h ( > sulfur coa l L. 2 l bS0„ ) 21 0 1,27 0 1,45 0 6,01 0 8,46 0 33,76 0 1,96 0 1,97 0 4,92 0 1,62 0 61,63 0 1. 0 Lo wsulfu r lb/MMBt u

coa l ( < 1. 2 l bS0„ ) 16 0 40 0 68 0 7,58 0 4,96 0 4,26 0 59 0 2,31 0 0 61 0 21,55 0 NSP S

Hig h ( > 3 / Cas e ' sulfu r coa l L. 2 lbSO J 8 0 78 0 87 0 0 2,72 0 23,61 0 1,03 0 11 0 4,21 0 99 0 34,40 0 1 /



### 2 /

3 / Output s fromIFCA

Mrun s o f Augus t 11 , 1981 . Thes e result s ar e the lates t available , bu t ar e obsolet e fo r analyzing th e NSPS . However , theycan b e use d fo r sensitivit ypurpose s i n th e preliminar yevaluatio n o f low sulfu r coa l availabilit yan d lowsulfu r coa l prices . Industria l fue l us e growth , it s regiona l distribution , an d fossi l fue l price s ar e base d o n EIA' s Annua l Repor t t o Congress , 1980 . Projection s us e the mediumpric e scenario , whic hassum e 198 5 an d 199 5 worl d crud e oi l price s o f $34.00/barre l an

d $45.90/barrel , respectivel y(197 8 $) . 1. 0 lbS O standar d applie s t o al l ne windustria l coa l boiler s £ 1 0 MMBtu/hr . AP Mstandar d o f .0 5 lb/MMBt u als o applie s t o al l ne wcoa l boilers . I n addition , the curren t NSP S fo r oil

- an d gas-fire d boiler s i s extende d t o cove r al l ne wboiler s £ 1 0 MMBtu/hr .

C O
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

 

In connection with the Annual Report of Movie Gallery, Inc. (the“Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ending January 4, 2004 asfiled with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the“Report”), I, J. Steven Roy, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)                                  The Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of1934; and

 

(2)                                  The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

 
| Date:  March 11, 2004    |
|------------------------------------|
|                               |
|                               |
| /s/  J. Steven Roy            |   |
| Name:  J. Steven Roy          |
| Its:  Chief Financial Officer |

 

 

A signed original of this written statement required bySection 906 has been provided to Movie Gallery, Inc. and will be retainedby Movie Gallery, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commissionor its staff upon request.

 

----
EXHIBIT 32.2

 

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)

 

In connection with this Report on Form 10-Q for the three and nine months ended June 30, 2022 (the “Report”) of PennantPark Floating Rate Capital, Ltd. (the “Registrant”), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Richard T. Allorto, Jr., Chief Financial Officer of the Registrant, hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge, that:

 

(1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

(2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.

 

|                             |        |                         |
|-----------------------------|--------|-------------------------|
| /s/ Richard T. Allorto, Jr. |
| Name:                       |   | Richard T. Allorto, Jr. |
| Title:                      |   | Chief Financial Officer |
| Date:                       |   | August 3, 2022          |

 

 

----
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Robert Jones, Appellant.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Juviler, J.), rendered November 19, 1986, convicting him of criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree and criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant contends that certain inconsistencies rendered the complainant’s testimony incredible. However, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution *(see, People v Contes,*60 NY2d 620), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Moreover, resolution of issues of credibility, as well as the weight to be accorded the evidence presented, are primarily questions to be determined by the jury, which saw and heard the witnesses *(see, People v Gaimari,*176 NY 84, 94). Its determination should be accorded great weight on appeal and should not be disturbed unless clearly unsupported by the record *(see, People v Garafolo,*44 AD2d 86, 88). Upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict was not against the weight of the evidence *(see,*CPL 470.15 [5]).

Furthermore, the trial court did not improvidently exercise its discretion in ruling that the prosecutor could cross-examine the defendant with respect to two of five prior crimes in the event that he elected to testify *(see, People v Sandoval,*34 NY2d 371). Significantly, both convictions which the court declined to preclude involved theft-related offenses, and demonstrated the defendant’s willingness to place his own interests ahead of the interests of society *(see, People v Sandoval, supra; People v Branch,*155 AD2d 475). Moreover, the prior convictions were not so remote in time as to mandate preclusion *(see, People v Salcedo,*133 AD2d 129; *see also, People v Damon,*150 AD2d 479).

We have examined the defendant’s remaining contentions, including those raised in his supplemental *pro se*brief, and find that they are either unpreserved for appellate review, or are without merit. Lawrence, J. P., Eiber, Balletta and Ritter, JJ., concur.
##### 



Exhibit 23 Independent Auditors Consent The Board of Directors
DiamondCluster International, Inc.: We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements
(No. 333-31965, No. 333-88155, No. 333-92213,
No. 333-50834, No. 333-47830, No.
333-64276, No. 333-71208, No. 333-64278 and No. 333-67899) on Form S-8 of
DiamondCluster International, Inc. of our reports dated April 25, 2004, with
respect to the consolidated balance sheets of DiamondCluster International,
Inc. as of March 31, 2003 and 2004, and the related consolidated statements of
operations and comprehensive loss, stockholders equity, and cash flows for
each of the years in the three-year period ended March 31, 2004, and the
related financial statement schedule, which reports appear in the March 31,
2004, annual report on Form 10-K of DiamondCluster International, Inc. Our
report on the consolidated financial statements contains an explanatory
paragraph that describes the Companys changes in its method of accounting for
stock based compensation effective April 1, 2003, and its method of accounting
for goodwill as of January 1, 2002. (signed) KPMG LLP Chicago, Illinois
April 25, 2004
II 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 581 

To amend section 1105(a) of title 31, United States Code, to require that 

annual budget submissions of the President to Congress provide an 

estimate of the cost per taxpayer of the deficit, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 14, 2013 

Mr. COATS (for himself and Mr. DONNELLY) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on the Budget 

A BILL 

To amend section 1105(a) of title 31, United States Code, 

to require that annual budget submissions of the President to Congress provide an estimate of the cost per 

taxpayer of the deficit, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. REQUIREMENT IN BUDGET SUBMISSION WITH 

4 RESPECT TO THE COST PER TAXPAYER OF 

5 THE DEFICIT. 

6 Section 1105(a) of title 31, United States Code, is 

7 amended— 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 581 IS

1 (1) by redesignating paragraph (37) (relating to 

2 the list of outdated or duplicative plans and reports) 

3 as paragraph (39); and 

4 (2) by adding at the end the following: 

5 ‘‘(40) in the case of a fiscal year in which the 

6 budget is projected to result in a deficit, an estimate 

7 of the pro rata cost of such deficit for taxpayers who 

8 will file individual income tax returns for taxable 

9 years ending during such fiscal year.’’. 

Æ 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
**Exhibit 23.2**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT**

**REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

American Technology Corporation 

San Diego, CA 

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Forms S-8 (File No. 333-09265, File No. 333-09269, FileNo. 333-23845, File No. 333-59929, File No. 333-54034, File No. 333-101279, File No. 333-125454 and File No. 333-128263) and Forms S-3 (File No. 333-99675, File No. 333-105740, File No. 333-107635, FileNo. 333-127534 and File No. 333-137289) of our report dated November 10, 2004, except for Note 1 as it pertains to fiscal years 2004 and prior, as to which the date is January 5, 2007, relating to the 2004 financial statements andschedule of American Technology Corporation appearing in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended September 30, 2006. 

/s/    BDO Seidman, LLP 

Costa Mesa, CA 

January 5, 2007
#### In the Matter of John Marcondes, Petitioner, v Benjamin Ward, as New York City Police Commissioner, et al., Respondents.

Determination of respondent Commissioner, dated October 5, 1989, which after a hearing, dismissed peti*319tioner from the New York City Police Department upon the finding that petitioner violated certain departmental rules and regulations, unanimously confirmed, the petition denied, and the proceeding transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, New York County (Eve Preminger, J.), entered April 4, 1990, dismissed, without costs.

Petitioner was found to have committed several infractions the most serious of which were being absent without leave, failing to properly safeguard his service revolver, and impeding an investigation into the loss of that weapon. The Hearing Officer’s determination that the petitioner’s testimony was not credible, when taken together with the other evidence adduced, constituted substantial evidence and sufficiently supported his determination. *(Matter of Berenhaus v Ward,*70 NY2d 436, 443.) The penalty of dismissal from the force was not inappropriate considering the misconduct detailed here, the petitioner’s previous delinquent record, and the compelling interest of maintaining internal discipline in the police department. *(Richichi v Galligan,*136 AD2d 616.) Concur— Murphy, P. J., Carro, Kupferman and Smith, JJ.
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 3513

To terminate the gas turbine-modular helium reactor program of the

Department of Energy, and to dedicate the savings to deficit reduction.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

NOVEMBER 16, 1993

Ms. BYRNE introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee

on Science, Space, and Technology

A BILL

To terminate the gas turbine-modular helium reactor program of the Department of Energy, and to dedicate

the savings to deficit reduction.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. TERMINATION OF GAS TURBINE-MODULAR HE4 LIUM REACTOR PROGRAM.

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding the provisions of

6 sections 2121 through 2126 of the Energy Policy Act of

7 1992 (106 Stat. 3081; 42 U.S.C. 13491 et seq.), the Sec8 retary of Energy shall take such actions as may be nec9 essary to terminate, as soon as possible, the gas turbine-
2

•HR 3513 IH

1 modular helium reactor program of the Department of

2 Energy.

3 (b) TRANSFER OF PROJECT FUNDS TO DEFICIT RE4 DUCTION FUND.—Of the funds made available under the

5 heading ‘‘Department of Energy—Energy Supply, Re6 search and Development Activities’’ in the Energy and

7 Water Development Appropriations Act, 1994 (Public

8 Law 103–126), $12,000,000 shall be transferred to the

9 Deficit Reduction Fund established by Executive Order

10 12858 (58 Fed. Reg. 42185). Such sum shall be in addi11 tion to the amounts specified in section 2(b) of such order,

12 but shall be subject to the requirements and limitations

13 set forth in sections 2(c) and 3 of such order.

Æ
II 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 703 

To amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to provide for the eligibility 

of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region for designation for 

participation in the visa waiver program for certain visitors to the United 

States. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

APRIL 11, 2013 

Ms. HIRONO (for herself and Mr. HATCH) introduced the following bill; which 

was read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to provide 

for the eligibility of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region for designation for participation in the visa 

waiver program for certain visitors to the United States. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 703 IS

1 SECTION 1. ELIGIBILITY OF HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMIN2 ISTRATIVE REGION FOR DESIGNATION FOR 

3 PARTICIPATION IN VISA WAIVER PROGRAM 

4 FOR CERTAIN VISITORS TO THE UNITED 

5 STATES. 

6 Section 217(c) of the Immigration and Nationality 

7 Act (8 U.S.C. 1187(c)) is amended by adding at the end 

8 the following new paragraph: 

9 ‘‘(12) ELIGIBILITY OF CERTAIN REGION FOR

10 DESIGNATION AS PROGRAM COUNTRY.—The Hong 

11 Kong Special Administrative Region of the People’s 

12 Republic of China— 

13 ‘‘(A) shall be eligible for designation as a 

14 program country for purposes of this sub15 section; and 

16 ‘‘(B) may be designated as a program 

17 country for purposes of this subsection if such 

18 region meets requirements applicable for such 

19 designation in this subsection.’’. 

Æ 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended
June 30, 2015 (the Report) of Solar Senior Capital Ltd. (the Registrant), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, MICHAEL S. GROSS, the Chief Executive Officer of the Registrant,
hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) The information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.



|      |  |                        
|----- |  | -----------------------
|      |  | /S/    MICHAEL S.
GROSS
|Name: |  | Michael S. Gross       
|Date: |  | August 4, 2015
#### Mitchell Drenckhahn, Respondent, v Harry Simmons et al., Appellants.

Order unanimously affirmed with costs. Memorandum: In moving for summary judgment, defendants failed to negate the existence of a factual issue whether the injury or impairment prevented plaintiff from performing substantially all of his usual and customary daily activities for at least 90 of the first 180 days following the accident *(see,*Insurance Law § 5102 [d]). Summary judgment was, therefore, properly denied *(cf., Alvarez v Prospect Hosp.,*68 NY2d 320, 324). (Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Queens County, Hentel, J.—Summary Judgment.) Present—Callahan, J. P., Denman, Green, Balio and Davis, JJ.