In the United States Court of Federal Claims 

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS 

No. 16-0052V 

Filed: June 2, 2016 

UNPUBLISHED 

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * 

DIANA HAGERMAN, * 

 * 

 Petitioner, * Damages Decision Based on Proffer; 

v. * Influenza (“Flu”) Vaccine; Shoulder 

 * Injury Related to Vaccine Administration 

SECRETARY OF HEALTH * (“SIRVA”); Special Processing Unit 

AND HUMAN SERVICES, * (“SPU”) 

 * 

 Respondent. * 

 * 

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * 

Maximillian J. Muller, Muller Brazil, LLP, Dresher, PA, for petitioner. 

Ann Donohue Martin, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent. 

DECISION AWARDING DAMAGES1

Dorsey, Chief Special Master: 

 On January 12, 2016, Diana Hagerman (“petitioner”) filed a petition for 

compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. 

§300aa-10, et seq.,

2 (the “Vaccine Act”). Petitioner alleges that she suffered injuries to 

her right shoulder which were caused-in-fact by an influenza (“flu”) vaccine she received 

on November 4, 2014. Petition at 1. The case was assigned to the Special Processing 

Unit of the Office of Special Masters. 

On April 27, 2016, a ruling on entitlement was issued, finding petitioner entitled to 

compensation. On June 2, 2016, respondent filed a proffer on award of compensation 

(“Proffer”) indicating petitioner should be awarded $130,000.00. Proffer at 1. In the 

Proffer, respondent represented that petitioner agrees with the proffered award. Based 

 

1 Because this unpublished decision contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, the 

undersigned intends to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website, in accordance with 

the E-Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of 

Electronic Government Services). In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), petitioner has 14 days to 

identify and move to redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an 

unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, the undersigned agrees that the identified material fits 

within this definition, the undersigned will redact such material from public access. 

2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for 

ease of citation, all “§” references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. § 

300aa (2012). 
2 

on the record as a whole, the undersigned finds that petitioner is entitled to an award as 

stated in the Proffer. 

 Pursuant to the terms stated in the attached Proffer, the undersigned awards 

petitioner a lump sum payment of $130,000.00, in the form of a check payable to 

petitioner, Diana Hagerman. This amount represents compensation for all damages 

that would be available under § 300aa-15(a). 

The clerk of the court is directed to enter judgment in accordance with this 

decision.3 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

 s/Nora Beth Dorsey 

 Nora Beth Dorsey 

 Chief Special Master 

 

3 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment can be expedited by the parties’ joint filing of notice 

renouncing the right to seek review.
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

____________________________________

 )

DIANA HAGERMAN, )

)

Petitioner, )

) No. 16-52V

v. ) Chief Special Master Dorsey 

) ECF

SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND ) 

HUMAN SERVICES, )

)

Respondent. )

____________________________________) 

RESPONDENT’S PROFFER ON AWARD OF COMPENSATION

I. Items of Compensation

Based upon the evidence of record, respondent proffers that petitioner should be awarded 

$130,000.00, which represents all elements of compensation to which petitioner would be 

entitled under 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a).1 Petitioner agrees. 

II. Form of the Award

The parties recommend that the compensation provided to petitioner should be made 

through a lump sum payment of $130,000.00 in the form of a check payable to petitioner. 

Petitioner agrees. 

Respectfully submitted, 

BENJAMIN C. MIZER

Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General

RUPA BHATTACHARYYA

Director

Torts Branch, Civil Division

 1 Should petitioner die prior to entry of judgment, the parties reserve the right to move the Court 

for appropriate relief. In particular, respondent would oppose any award for future pain and 

suffering. 
2

CATHARINE E. REEVES

Acting Deputy Director

Torts Branch, Civil Division

LINDA S. RENZI

Senior Trial Counsel

Torts Branch, Civil Division

s/ ANN D. MARTIN 

ANN D. MARTIN

Senior Trial Attorney

Torts Branch, Civil Division

U.S. Department of Justice

P.O. Box 146

Benjamin Franklin Station

Washington, D.C. 20044-0146

Tel.: (202) 307-1815

DATED: June 2, 2016