alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 21
- 1229

JOSE CONTRERAS

- CARRILLO , Petitioner ,

v. MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General , Respondent

.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals.

Submitted : September 29, 2021 Decided: October 26, 2021

Before MOTZ and FLOYD , Circuit Judges , and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge

.
Petition denied by un published per curiam opinion

. Mark J. Devine, Charleston, South Carolina, for Petitioner. Brian Boynton, Acting Assistant Attorney General, Mary Jane Candaux, Assistant Director, Remi Da Rocha

Afodu, Trial Attorney, Office of Immigration Litigation, Civil Division, UNITED STATES DEPAR TMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Jose Contreras

- Carrillo, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appea ls ( “ Board ” ) dismissing his appeal from the i mmigration j udge’s decision denying his application for cancellation of removal under 8 U.S.C. § 1229b(b)(1). The denial of relief was based o n the finding that Contreras

- Carrillo failed to show that his remova l would be an exceptional and extremely unusual hardship to his three citizen

- sons. We review this determination as a mixed question of fact and law. Gonzalez Galvan v. Garland , 6 F.4th 552, 559

- 60 (4th Cir. 2021). We have reviewed the record and conclu de that there is no error. We have considered Contreras

- Carrillo’s claim that his removal would violate his citizen

- sons’ rights under the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments and find th is claim to be without merit. See Marin

- Garcia v. Holder , 647 F.3d 666, 672 (7th Cir. 2011); Payne

- Barahona v. Gonzales , 474 F.3d 1, 3 (1st Cir. 2007); Gallanosa v. United States , 785 F.2d 116, 120 (4th Cir. 1986). Accordingly, we deny the petition for review. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal questions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. PETITION DENIED
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLAImages

# DLA Images

Search

Search

                                  - All Images 
                                  - Other 

                                  - Upload Date
                                  - Photo Date
                                  - Title

Share

----

Download Image: Small ()Medium ()Full Size (0.24 MB)

Tags:DLA Distribution, Defense Logistics Agency Distribution, Col Karen Stoff, dla, Defense Logistics Agency, AIR FORCE, Retirement

Photo by:VIRIN: 

Photo Gallery
Exhibit
32.1

Certification of Principal
Executive Officer
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report
of Bridgeway Acquisition Corp. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended April 30, 2011 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Keri B. Bosch, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|Date: June 13, 2011 |                                                         | /s/ Keri B. Bosch
|------------------- | ------------------------------------------------------- | -----------------
|                    | Name: Keri B. Bosch
        Principal Executive Officer
<PAGE>
                                                                               .
                                                                               .
                                                                               .
                                                                       Exhibit 8



                              LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                                               JURISDICTION OF
SUBSIDIARY COMPANY                                                              ORGANIZATION
------------------                                                              --------------

<S>     <C>                                                                      <C>
I.      EMPAQUES DE CARTON TITAN, S.A. DE C.V.                                   Mexico

        A.   Envases y Empaques de Mexico, S.A. de C.V.                          Mexico

        B.   Cartonpak, S.A. de C.V.                                             Mexico

        C.   Cajas y Corrugados de Chihuahua, S.A. de C.V.                       Mexico

        D.   Central de Envases y Empaques, S.A. de C.V.                         Mexico

        E.   Papelera Heda, S.A. de C.V.                                         Mexico

        F.   Ectsa International, Inc.                                           Texas, U.S.A.

II.     DURANGO INTERNATIONAL, INC.                                              New Mexico, U.S.A.

        A.   Durango McKinley Paper Company                                      New Mexico, U.S.A.

        B.   Fiber Management of Texas                                           Texas, U.S.A.

III.    COMPANIA PAPELERA DE ATENQUIQUE, S.A. DE C.V.                            Mexico

        A.   Forestal de Jalisco, S.A. de C.V.                                   Mexico

IV.     PONDEROSA INDUSTRIAL DE MEXICO, S.A. DE C.V.                             Mexico

V.      PORTEADORES DE DURANGO, S.A. DE C.V.                                     Mexico

VI.     ADMINISTRACION CORPORATIVA DE DURANGO, S.A. DE C.V.                      Mexico

VII.    GRUPO PIPSAMEX, S.A. DE C.V.                                             Mexico

        A.   Fabricas de Papel Tuxtepec, S.A. de C.V.                            Mexico

        B.   Fabrica Mexicana de Papel, S.A. de C.V.                             Mexico

        C.   Productora Nacional de Papel, S.A. de C.V.                          Mexico

        D.   Fibras de Durango, S.A. de C.V.                                     Mexico

        F.   Papeles Forma-Todo, S.A. de C.V.                                    Mexico

VIII.   Industrias Centauro, S.A. de C.V.                                        Mexico


</TABLE>
#### Walter Mazurick et al., Respondents, v Michael Chalos et al., Appellants, et al., Defendants.

In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the defendant Michael Chalos appeals from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Roberto, J.), entered October 31, 1989, as denied his motion pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) (1) and (7) to dismiss the complaint insofar as asserted against him, and the defendant Michele Chalos separately appeals from so much of the same order as denied her motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against her.

Ordered that the order is reversed insofar as appealed from, on the law, with one bill of costs, the motions are granted, the complaint is dismissed insofar as asserted against Michael Chalos and Michele Chalos, and the action against the remaining defendants is severed.

Although "the unilateral actions of a party in seeking summary judgment on a CPLR 3211 (a) (7) motion cannot constitute 'adequate notice’ to the other party in compliance with the requirement of CPLR 3211 (c)” *(Mihlovan v Grozavu,*72 NY2d 506, 508, n), we find that, based on the record before us, the parties were "deliberately charting a summary judgment course” *(Four Seasons Hotels v Vinnik,*127 AD2d 310, 320; *see also, Mihlovan v Grozavu, supra).*Therefore, the defendant Michael Chalos’ motion pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) (1) and (7) may properly be treated as one for summary judgment. Additionally, although Michele Chalos’ separate motion pursuant to CPLR 3212 was not properly before the court, since issue had not yet been joined, the court may search the record and grant summary judgment to Michele Chalos, based upon the motion of Michael Chalos pursuant to CPLR 3211 (c).

*806Where an owner of property is no longer in possession and control of the property, and retains no right to reenter for purposes of inspection and repair, then he cannot be held liable for defects in the property *(see, Worth Distribs. v Latham,*59 NY2d 231; *Bowles v City of New York,*154 AD2d 324). Here, the property upon which the alleged accident occurred had been in the possession and control of a court-appointed temporary receiver for approximately two years. The temporary receiver had the authority and funds to make necessary repairs, and indeed, spent over $10,000 on repairs, and the defendants, Michael Chalos and Michele Chalos, were enjoined from interfering with the receiver. Even if the alleged defective condition on the property had existed prior to the appointment of the receiver, the owners’ liability for that condition ended when possession and control passed prior to the injury, and the receiver had a reasonable time to discover and repair the condition *(see, Pharm v Lituchy,*283 NY 130; *Camillery v Getty Ref. & Mktg. Co.,*170 AD2d 567). We find that two years was a reasonable amount of time to discover and repair the condition. Bracken, J. P., Sullivan, Miller and Ritter, JJ., concur.
<PAGE>


                                                                      Exhibit 11

                               OccuSystems, Inc.
                         Net Income for 1996 and 1995
                Numbers, except per share amounts, in thousands

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                Year Ended
                                                            ------------------
                                                            12/31/96  12/31/95
                                                            --------  --------
<S>                                                         <C>       <C>
Net Income                                                  $11,033   $ 3,220

Interest on Common Stock Equivalents, net of tax                146       366
                                                            -------   -------
Primary Earnings                                            $11,179   $ 3,586
                                                            =======   =======

Wtd. Average Shares                                          22,029    19,115

Net Income Per Share                                        $  0.51   $  0.19

Weighted Common Shares Outstanding                           20,766    17,474

Weighted Common Share Equivalents Outstanding                 1,262     1,641
                                                            -------   -------
Weighted Average Shares Outstanding                          22,029    19,115
                                                            =======   =======

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 659 Reported in Senate (RS)]

                                                       Calendar No. 130
113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 659

                          [Report No. 113-73]

 To reauthorize the Reclamation States Emergency Drought Relief Act of 
                     1991, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 22, 2013

   Mr. Wyden introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
       referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources

                             July 15, 2013

                Reported by Mr. Wyden, with an amendment
  [Omit the part struck through and insert the part printed in italic]

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To reauthorize the Reclamation States Emergency Drought Relief Act of 
                     1991, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF RECLAMATION STATES EMERGENCY DROUGHT RELIEF ACT 
              OF 1991.

    (a) Termination of Authority.--Section 104(c) of the Reclamation 
States Emergency Drought Relief Act of 1991 (43 U.S.C. 2214(c)) is 
amended by striking ``2012'' and inserting ``2018''.
<DELETED>    (b) Authorization of Appropriations.--Section 301 of the 
Reclamation States Emergency Drought Relief Act of 1991 (43 U.S.C. 
2241) is amended--</DELETED>
        <DELETED>    (1) by striking ``$90,000,000'' and inserting 
        ``$110,000,000''; and</DELETED>
        <DELETED>    (2) by striking ``2012'' and inserting 
        ``2018''.</DELETED>
    (b) Authorization of Appropriations.--Section 301 of the 
Reclamation States Emergency Drought Relief Act of 1991 (43 U.S.C. 
2241) is amended by striking ``2012'' and inserting ``2018''.
                                                       Calendar No. 130

113th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                                 S. 659

                          [Report No. 113-73]

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 To reauthorize the Reclamation States Emergency Drought Relief Act of 
                     1991, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                             July 15, 2013

                       Reported with an amendment
```
```

[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 96 (Thursday, May 17, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 29321-29322]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-11977]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

National Coal Council

AGENCY: Department of Energy.

ACTION: Notice of open meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice announces a meeting of the National Coal Council 
(NCC). The Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463, 86 Stat. 
770) requires that public notice of these meetings be announced in the 
Federal Register.

DATES: Thursday, June 7, 2012, 10:00 a.m. to 3:00 p.m.

ADDRESSES: Crowne Plaza Chicago O'Hare, 5440 North River Road, 
Rosemont, Illinois 60018.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dr. Robert J. Wright, U.S. Department 
of Energy; 4G-036/Forrestal Building, 1000 Independence Avenue SW., 
Washington, DC 20585-1290; Telephone: 202-586-0429.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 
    Purpose of Meeting: The Coal Policy Committee of the National Coal 
Council will review the draft of a report requested by Secretary of 
Energy Steven Chu in a letter dated October 28, 2011, to the Council.

Tentative Agenda

    [squf] Review and action on the report.
    [squf] Adjourn.
    Public Participation: The meeting is open to the public. If you 
would like to file a written statement with the Committee, you may do 
so either before or after the meeting. If you would like to make oral 
statements regarding any potential items on the agenda, you should 
contact Dr. Robert J. Wright, 202-586-0429 or Robert.wright@hq.doe.gov 
(email). You must make your request for an oral statement at least 5 
business days before the meeting. Reasonable provision will be made to 
include the scheduled oral

[[Page 29322]]

statements on the agenda. The Chairperson of the Committee will conduct 
the meeting to facilitate the orderly conduct of business. Public 
comment will follow the 10-minute rule.
    Minutes: The NCC will prepare meeting minutes within 45 days of the 
meeting. The minutes will be posted on the NCC Web site at http://www.nationalcoalcouncil.org/.

    Dated: Issued at Washington, DC, on May 11, 2012.
LaTanya R. Butler,
Acting Deputy Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 2012-11977 Filed 5-16-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450-01-P
```
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLAImages

# DLA Images

Search

Search

                                  - All Images 
                                  - Other 

                                  - Upload Date
                                  - Photo Date
                                  - Title

Share

----

Download Image: Small ()Medium ()Full Size (1.81 MB)

Tags:DLA Distribution, Defense Logistics Agency Distribution, dla, Process excellence, Defense Logistics Agency

Photo by:VIRIN: 

Photo Gallery
**From:** Bean, Greg [mailto:greg.bean@weyerhaeuser.com]

**Sent:** Friday, May 04, 2012 5:05 PM **To:** a - and - r - docket@epa.gov **Cc:** PPSURVEY; Schrock.Bill@epa.gov; Bradfield.john@epa.gov; Woock, Steve; Crapo, Ann; Wood, Brian; Wood, Mike; Johnson, Ken; Haynes, Tim **Sub ject:**  Attention Docket ID No. EPA- HQ - OAR 2007 0544 The attached files are being submitted for corrections to Subpart S data & Facility

- Wide Risk Modeling Results for Weyerhaeuser NR Company, Longview, WA. An explanation of the corrections is included in the attached cover letter (scanned pdf copy of the signed letter, plus a clean pdf copy without the signature). Two NCASI guidance documents are also included for reference. The corrected data is in the attached Excel spreadsheet. Gregory R. Bean Sr. Environmental Engineer Weyerhaeuser NR Company greg.bean@weyerhaeuser.com (360)578

- 4445
Exhibit 32.1





Securities and Exchange Commission


100 F Street, N.E.


Washington, D.C. 20549





RE:     Certification pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350)





Ladies and Gentlemen:





In connection with the Quarterly Report of SandRidge Mississippian Trust I (the “Trust”) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2017 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, not in its individual capacity but solely as the Trustee of the Trust, certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, that to its knowledge:





|    |                                                                                                                                                  
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




|    |                                                                                                                                                   
|--- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Trust.




The above certification is furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350) and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.





/s/ Sarah NewellSarah NewellVice PresidentThe Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A., as Trustee of SandRidge Mississippian Trust I





November 7, 2017