alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
This opinion is subject to administrative correction before final disposition.

Before 

STEPHENS, ATTANASIO, and DEERWESTER

Appellate Military Judges

_________________________

UNITED STATES

Appellee

v.

David I. WEAVER

Aviation Machinist’s Mate Third Class (E-4), U.S. Navy

Appellant

No. 202100194

_________________________

Decided: 15 March 2022

Appeal from the United States Navy-Marine Corps Trial Judiciary 

Military Judge: 

Hayes C. Larsen

Sentence adjudged 14 April 2021 by a special court-martial convened at 

Naval Station Norfolk, Norfolk, Virginia, consisting of a military judge 

sitting alone. Sentence in the Entry of Judgment: reduction to E-1, confinement for 180 days, and a bad-conduct discharge.

For Appellant: 

Captain Daniel J. McCoy, JAGC, USN

_________________________

This opinion does not serve as binding precedent under 

NMCCA Rule of Appellate Procedure 30.2(a).

_________________________
United States v. Weaver, NMCCA No. 202100194

Opinion of the Court

2

PER CURIAM:

After careful consideration of the record, submitted without assignment of 

error, we have determined that the findings and sentence are correct in law 

and fact and that no error materially prejudicial to Appellant’s substantial 

rights occurred.1

The findings and sentence are AFFIRMED.

FOR THE COURT:

RODGER A. DREW, JR.

Clerk of Court

 

1 Articles 59 & 66, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. §§ 859, 866.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     (Replace this text with the legend)
</LEGEND>
                   
                      
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              MAR-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 APR-01-1997  
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                                4241
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        31710
<ALLOWANCES>                                          1697
<INVENTORY>                                          37223
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     77614
<PP&E>                                               34435
<DEPRECIATION>                                       16733
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                      105120
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                70868
<BONDS>                                              10000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                               111
<OTHER-SE>                                           12296
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                        105120
<SALES>                                              94271
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     94271
<CGS>                                                63917
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        41703
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                      (152)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                    5794
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     (16991)
<INCOME-TAX>                                          (522)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 (17329)
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                 0
<NET-INCOME>                                        (17329)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        (1.56)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        (1.56)
        


</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 04-7471

MELVIN DOUGLAS SMITH, JR., Petitioner - Appellant, versus GENE M. JOHNSON, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, District Judge. (CA-03-802) Submitted: January 26, 2005 Decided: February 17, 2005 Before LUTTIG, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Melvin Douglas Smith, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Kathleen Beatty Martin, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: Melvin Douglas Smith, Jr., seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000). An appeal may not be taken from the final order in a § 2254 proceeding unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that his constitutional claims are debatable and that any dispositive procedural rulings by the district court are also debatable or wrong. See Miller-El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee , 252 F.3d 676, 683 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Smith has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4087 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4087

  To amend title 18, United States Code, to prevent Federal prisoners 
  from engaging in activities to increase their strength or fighting 
                        ability while in prison.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 17, 1994

Ms. Pryce of Ohio (for herself and Mr. Stupak) introduced the following 
       bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend title 18, United States Code, to prevent Federal prisoners 
  from engaging in activities to increase their strength or fighting 
                        ability while in prison.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Prison Security Enhancement Act of 
1994''.

SEC. 2. PRISON SECURITY.

    (a) In General.--Chapter 303 of title 18, United States Code, is 
amended by adding at the end the following new section:
``Sec. 4047. Strength-training of prisoners prohibited
    ``The Bureau of Prisons shall take care that--
            ``(1) prisoners under its jurisdiction do not engage in any 
        activities designed to increase their physical strength or 
        their fighting ability; and
            ``(2) that all equipment designed for this purpose be 
        removed from Federal correctional facilities.''.
    (b) Clerical Amendment.--The table of sections at the beginning of 
chapter 303 of title 18, United States Code, is amended by adding at 
the end the following new item:

``4047. Strength-training of prisoners prohibited.''.

                                 <all>
```
----

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.3706 — Övag/Investkredit)

(2005/C 101/07)

(Text with EEA relevance)

On 15 April 2005, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in German and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

----
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLAImages

# DLA Images

Search

Search

                                  - All Images 
                                  - Other 

                                  - Upload Date
                                  - Photo Date
                                  - Title

Share

----

Download Image: Small ()Medium ()Full Size (0.47 MB)

Tags:Port Hueneme, DLA Distribution, Defense Logistics Agency Distribution, DLA Distribution San Diego, LGTB Awareness, transgender, dla, Defense Logistics Agency

Photo by:VIRIN: 

Photo Gallery
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Finance and Accounting Service Providing payment services for the U.S. Department of Defense

Search
Search

Search

              - 
              - 
              - 
              - 
              - 

-  Military Member		 
-  Retired Military & Annuitant		 
-  Civilian Employee		 
-  Contractor & Vendor		 

HomedebtandclaimspaymydebtDebt Repayment OptionsLump Sum Payment

**866-912-6488 **Mon-Fri:7:30 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. ESTContact UsPrivacy Information

askDFAS

                        - Pay My Debt                            - Debt Repayment Options
                          - Student Deferment Applications
                          - If I Don't Pay My Debt
                        - Military Debts                            - I am in the military
                          - I was in the military
                          - I Disagree with my Debt
                          - I have an education debt
                        - Non-Military Debts                            - I am a current Federal Employee
                          - Former Federal Employee
                          - Spouse or Child of Former Military Member
                        - Out of Service Debt                            - Out-of-Service Debt Payment Status Tool
                          - Refer an Out-of-Service Debt
                          - More Information
                          - COVID-19 Out of Service Debt Information
                        - Travel or Transportation Debt
                        - Bankruptcy
                        - Submit a Claim
                        - Forms
                        - Waivers and Remissions

#### **Lump Sum Payment**

----

##### **Payment Methods:**

                        - **Online Payments (Pay.gov****)**
**​****Pay.gov****click here **                        - **payDFAS App**
**eTutorial.**                        - **Checks and Money Orders**
**Link here to learn more.**
**Payment mailing addresses:**
Return to Debt Repayment Options
Page updated February 8, 2021

### Stay Connected

Department of Defense     Department of Veterans Affairs     Military Employment Verification     Warrior Care Website     Defense Contract Mgmt Agency  DoD Forms     Department of State     Civilian Personnel Mgmt Service     DTS Travel Center     System for Award Mgmt (SAM)    Congressional/LegislationPersonnel Force Innovation     Freedom of Information Act     DFAS Hotline   Contact Us    DoD Accessibility / Section 508   DFAS Section 508 Instruction  EEO / No Fear Act  

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil
#### Dennis West, Respondent-Appellant, v Daun West, Appellant-Respondent.

Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: The trial court’s order awarding defendant $750 on her application for counsel fees for enforcement proceedings in a divorce action, as opposed to the $5,553.73 requested, should be affirmed. A large portion of counsel’s services was devoted to support defendant’s dilatory tactics in obstructing the return of personal property required by prior court order. The amount that the trial court did award is reasonable compensation for the additional time expended because of plaintiffs failure to timely procure financing to buy out defendant’s share of the marital residence. Plaintiff previously paid $3,000 for defendant’s counsel fees and funds are readily available for defendant to pay her own fees. Given the financial circumstances of the parties and the particular circumstances of this case, the trial court’s refusal to grant the full amount of the application was not an abuse of discretion. (Appeals from Order, of Supreme Court, Erie County, Rath, Jr., J.—Enforce Divorce Decree.) Present—Denman, J. P., Boomer, Pine, Lawton and Davis, JJ.
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended
September 30, 2016 (the Report) of Solar Senior Capital Ltd. (the Registrant), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, RICHARD L. PETEKA, the Chief Financial Officer of the Registrant,
hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) The information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.



|      |  |                         
|----- |  | ------------------------
|      |  | /S/    RICHARD L.
PETEKA
|Name: |  | Richard L. Peteka       
|Date: |  | November 2, 2016
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Intelligence AgencyCOMMITTED TO EXCELLENCE IN DEFENSE OF THE NATION

Search
Search

Search
                    - Facilities Operating Status
                    - Employee Resources

-  Home		 
-  About    -  FAQs             
  -  Organization      -  Locations             
    -  Missile and Space Intelligence Center             
    -  Joint Military Attache School             
    -  Joint Military Intelligence Training Center 
  -  Open Source Intelligence             
  -  Equal Opportunity & Diversity             
  -  History      -  DIA Museum             
    -  George Washington Letters             
    -  Directors of DIA             
    -  The Historians 
  -  Sexual Assault Prevention and Response             
  -  Contact Us 
-  News & Features    -  Articles             
  -  Videos             
  -  DIA in the News             
  -  Threat Reports             
  -  Photo Gallery             
  -  No FEAR             
  -  Podcasts 
-  Careers & Opportunities    -  Career Fields      -  Analysis             
    -  Counterintelligence             
    -  Finance & Acquisition             
    -  Human Intelligence             
    -  Human Services             
    -  Information Technology             
    -  Inspector General             
    -  Legal             
    -  Mission Management             
    -  Office Management & Infrastructure             
    -  Science & Technology             
    -  Security 
  -  Search Vacancies             
  -  Apply to DIA             
  -  Hiring Process             
  -  Internships             
  -  Veteran Programs 
-  Business    -  Contractor Personnel Security             
  -  SIA3             
  -  SITE III             
  -  Innovation             
  -  NeedipeDIA             
  -  Office of Small Business Programs             
  -  Small Business FAQs 

HOMENEWS & FEATURES

Search

Search

                            - All Images 
                            - Other 

                            - Upload Date
                            - Photo Date
                            - Title

Share

----

Download Image: Small ()Medium ()Full Size (2.79 MB)

Tags:

Photo by:VIRIN: 

Photo Gallery
EXHIBIT 32.2

Exhibit 32.2Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) of the Exchange Act and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the annual report on Form 10-K of Advant-e Corporation (the Company) for the year ended December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the report), the undersigned, James E. Lesch, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:

(1) The report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and

(2) The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.



|                      |  |  |  |     |  |                        
|--------------------- |  |  |  | --- |  | -----------------------
|Dated: March 27, 2009 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/ James E. Lesch     
|                      |  |  |  |     |  | James E. Lesch         
|                      |  |  |  |     |  | Chief Financial Officer
# C_2014065EN.01000101.xml

| 5.3.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 65/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.3.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 65/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.7154 — World Fuel Services Corporation/Watson Petroleum Limited)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2014/C 65/01

On 28 February 2014, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32014M7154. EUR-Lex is the online access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32014M7154. EUR-Lex is the online access to the European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
#### In the Matter of Vito Carnazza, Individually and as Limited Guardian of His Children, Gaetano E. Carnazza and Others, Infants, Respondent. Emile E. Gouiran, Appellant.

? Order unanimously affirmed with costs for reasons stated in decision at Supreme Court, Amann, Jr., J. (Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Richmond County, Amann, Jr., J.—Remove Trustee.) Present—Callahan, J. P., Denman, Green, Balio and Davis, JJ.
#### LeRoy MITCHELL, Jr., Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 68-859.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Third District.

March 18, 1969.

LeRoy Mitchell, Jr., in pro. per.

Earl Faircloth, Atty. Gen., for appellee.

Before CHARLES CARROLL, C. J., and PEARSON and SWANN, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

This court, proceeding in the manner outlined and recommended by the Supreme Court of the United States in Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 744, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493, having deferred rul*17ing tin a motion of the public defender to withdraw as counsel for the indigent defendant-appellant, and having furnished appellant with a copy of the public defender’s memorandum brief, and having allowed the appellant a reasonable specified time within which to raise any points that he chose in support of his appeal, and the appellant having failed to respond thereto, on consideration thereof upon full examination of the proceedings we conclude that the appeal is wholly frivolous. Whereupon the public defender’s said motion to withdraw is granted, and the order or judgment appealed is hereby affirmed.