# DRAFT Work Plan/Sampling and Analysis Plan Monitoring Well Installation
RED HILL BULK FUEL STORAGE FACILITY JOINT BASE PEARL HARBOR-HICKAM, HAWAII DOH FACILITY ID: 9-102271 DOH RELEASE ID: 990051, 010011, 020028, 140010

11 July 2014



### Department of the Navy Naval Facilities Engineering Command, Hawaii 400 Marshall Road JBPHH, HI 96860-3139

Contract No. N62583-11-D-0515, Delivery Order No. KB01

# DRAFT Work Plan/Sampling and Analysis Plan Monitoring Well Installation
RED HILL BULK FUEL STORAGE FACILITY JOINT BASE PEARL HARBOR-HICKAM, HAWAII DOH FACILITY ID: 9-102271 DOH RELEASE ID: 990051, 010011, 020028, 140010

11 July 2014



### Prepared for:

Department of the Navy Naval Facilities Engineering Command, Hawaii 400 Marshall Road JBPHH, HI 96860-3139
Prepared by: 

### PARSONS 10235 South Jordan Gateway Suite 300 South Jordan, UT 84095
Prepared under : 

### Contract No. N62583-11-D-0515, Delivery Order No. KB01Work Plan/Sampling and Analysis Plan, Monitoring Well Installation 

## DRAFT WORK PLAN/SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS PLAN MONITORING WELL INSTALLATON RED HILL BULK FUEL STORAGE FACILITY JOINT BASE PEARL HARB OR-HICKAM, HAWAII
Prepared For 

## Department of the Navy Naval Facilities Engine ering Command, Hawaii 400 Marshall Road JBPHH, HI 96860-3139
Contract Number: N62583-11-D-0515

Delivery Order Number: KB01 

### July 2014 Prepared By



### parsons 10235 South Jordan Gateway Suite 300 South Jordan, Utah 84095

Review Signature: Gene Wright/Parsons Project Manager Date
Review Signature: Carolyn Scala/Battelle Project Manager Date
Approval Signature: Bruce Tsuitsui / Navy Remedial Project Manager DateWork Plan/Sampling and Analysis Plan, Monitoring Well Installation i 

### TABLE OF CONTENTS

LIST OF TABLES ................................................................................................................ ......... iv LIST OF FIGURES ............................................................................................................... ........ iv ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS ........................................................................................v
SECTION 1.0 INTRODUCTION.................................................................................. 1-1
1.1 PROJECT PURPOSE .......................................................................................... 1-1 1.2 LOCATION AND SETTING .............................................................................. 1-1 1.3 SITE HISTORY ................................................................................................... 1-2 1.4 REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS................................................................... 1-3 SECTION 2.0 PROJECT ORGANIZATION .............................................................. 2-1
2.1 ROLE AND RESPONSIBILITIES ..................................................................... 2-1 2.1.1 NAFAC Remedial Project Manager .................................................. 2-1 2.1.2 Battelle Project Manager .................................................................... 2-1 2.1.3 Parsons Project Manager .................................................................... 2-2 2.1.4 Field Task Manager ............................................................................ 2-2 2.1.5 Site Safety and Health Officer ........................................................... 2-2 2.1.6 Chemist .............................................................................................. 2-3 2.1.7 QA Manager ....................................................................................... 2-3 2.1.8 Subcontractors .................................................................................... 2-4 2.2 PLANNING ......................................................................................................... 2-4 2.3 PERMITTING ..................................................................................................... 2-4 2.4 PROJECT SCHEDULE ....................................................................................... 2-4 2.5 HEALTH AND SAFETY REQUIREMENTS .................................................... 2-5 SECTION 3.0 FIELD ACTIVITI ES AND METHODOLOGY ................................. 3-1
3.1 PRE-INVESTIGATION ACTIVITIES ............................................................... 3-1 3.2 SCOPE OF FIELD ACTIVITIES ........................................................................ 3-2 3.3 ANALYTICAL METHODS AND REGULATORY COMP ARISON CRITERIA ........................................................................................................... 3-3 3.4 DRILLING LOCATION ACCESS, SITE PREPARATI ON, AND FENCING . 3-4 3.5 TRAFFIC CONTROL ......................................................................................... 3-5Work Plan/Sampling and Analysis Plan, Monitoring Well Installation ii 

### TABLE OF CONTENTS (CONTINUED)
3.6 DRILLING, WELL INSTALLA TION, AND SAMPLE COLLECTION ACTIVITIES........................................................................................................ 3-5 3.6.1 Drilling and Soil Sampling ................................................................ 3-5 3.6.1.1 Hollow Stem Auger ......................................................... 3-6 3.6.1.2 Rock Coring ..................................................................... 3-6 3.6.1.3 Air Rotary ........................................................................ 3-7 3.6.2 Monitoring Well Installation .............................................................. 3-7 3.6.3 Monitoring Well Development, Pump Installation and Groundwater Sampling ............................................................................................ 3-8 3.6.3.1 Monitoring Well Development ........................................ 3-8 3.6.3.2 Dedicated Groundwater Pump System Installation ......... 3-9 3.6.3.3 Groundwater Depth Monitoring, Purging, and Sampling 3-9 3.7 SAMPLE IDENTIFICATION, HA NDLING, AND SHIPPING ...................... 3-10 3.8 EQUIPMENT DECONTAMINATION ............................................................ 3-11 3.9 INVESTIGATION-DERIVED WASTE MANAGEMENT ............................. 3-11 3.10 SURVEYING .................................................................................................... 3-12 SECTION 4.0 QUALITY ASSUR ANCE PROJECT PLAN ...................................... 4-1 4.1 SUMMARY OF THE DATA QUALIT Y OBJECTIVES PROCESS ................ 4-1 4.1.1 Statement of the Problem ................................................................... 4-1 4.1.2 Identify the Goals ............................................................................... 4-1 4.1.3 Identify the Information ..................................................................... 4-2 4.1.4 Define the Boundaries of the Study ................................................... 4-2 4.1.5 Develop the Analytical Approach ...................................................... 4-2 4.1.6 Specify Performance Acceptance Criteria ......................................... 4-2 4.1.7 Develop the Plan for Obtaining Data ................................................. 4-2 4.2 QA/QC SAMPLING AND SAMPLE HANDLING PROCEDURES ................ 4-3 4.2.1 Sample Collection Method ................................................................. 4-3 4.2.2 Field QC Samples .............................................................................. 4-3 4.2.2.1 Duplicates ......................................................................... 4-3 4.2.2.2 MS/MSD .......................................................................... 4-3 4.2.2.3 Trip Blanks ....................................................................... 4-3Work Plan/Sampling and Analysis Plan, Monitoring Well Installation iii 

### TABLE OF CONTENTS (CONTINUED)
4.2.3 Sample Containers ............................................................................. 4-4 4.2.4 Sample Labeling ................................................................................ 4-4 4.2.5 Field Instrument Calibration/Documentation .................................... 4-4 4.3 LABORATORY REQUIREMENTS .................................................................. 4-5 4.3.1 Project Analytes ................................................................................. 4-5 4.3.2 Reporting Limits ................................................................................ 4-5 4.4 ANALYTICAL DATA QUALITY REVIEW .................................................... 4-6 4.4.1 Accuracy ............................................................................................ 4-6 4.4.2 Precision ............................................................................................. 4-6 4.4.3 Completeness ..................................................................................... 4-7 4.4.4 Representativeness ............................................................................. 4-7 4.4.5 Comparability ..................................................................................... 4-7 4.4.6 Sensitivity ........................................................................................... 4-7 4.5 DATA REPORTING AND DOCUMENTATION ............................................. 4-7 4.6 OVERSIGHT AND ASSESSMENT ................................................................... 4-8 4.7 CORRECTIVE ACTION .................................................................................... 4-8 4.7.1 Field Corrective Action ...................................................................... 4-9 4.7.2 Laboratory Corrective Action .......................................................... 4-10 4.7.3 Corrective Action Following Data Assessment ............................... 4-10 SECTION 5.0 REPORTING ......................................................................................... 5-1 SECTION 6.0 REFERENCES ....................................................................................... 6-1Work Plan/Sampling and Analysis Plan, Monitoring Well Installation iv 

### LIST OF FIGURES
FIGURE 1 Site Plan Map FIGURE 2 Proposed Monitoring Wells



### LIST OF TABLES
TABLE 1 Key Personnel TABLE 2 Soil Analytical Methods, Project Ac tion Levels, and Laboratory Specific Limits TABLE 3 Groundwater Analytical Methods, Proj ect Action Levels, and Laboratory Specific Limits TABLE 4 Analytical Methods, Sample Contai ners, Preservation, and Holding Times for Groundwater Sampling



### APPENDICES
APPENDIX A Monitoring Well Installation Schedule APPENDIX B Project Safety, H ealth, and Environment Plan APPENDIX C Project FormsWork Plan/Sampling and Analysis Plan, Monitoring Well Installation v 

### ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS

amsl above mean sea level bgs below ground surface BPM Battelle Project Manager BTEX benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, and xylenes BWS Board of Water Supply °C degrees Celsius CFR Code of Federal Regulations COC Chain of Custody COPCs Contaminants or Constituents of Potential Concern DLNR State of Hawaii Department of Land and Natural Resources DO dissolved oxygen DoD Department of Defense HDOH State of Hawaii De partment of Health DQO data quality objectives EAL Environmental Action Level EPA U.S. Environmental Protection Agency ESI Environmental Science International F-76 marine diesel fuel FISC Fleet and Industrial Supply Center FM Field Task Manager HAR Hawaii Administrative Rules HDOH State of Hawaii De partment of Health HECo Hawaiian Electric Company HPWS Hawaii rules relating to public water systems HSA Hollow-stem auger ID Identification IDW Investigation-derived waste JBPHH Joint Base Pearl Harbor-Hickam JP-5 Jet Fuel Propellant-5 JP-8 Jet Fuel Propellant-8 LCS laboratory control samples LD laboratory duplicate L/min liters per minute LOQ limit of quantitation LTM long-term groundwater and soil vapor monitoring MDL method detection limit MCL maximum contaminant level MS matrix spikeWork Plan/Sampling and Analysis Plan, Monitoring Well Installation vi 

### ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS (Continued)
MSD matrix spike duplicate NAVFAC Naval Facilities Engineering Command NAVSUP FLC Naval Supply Systems Co mmand Fleet Logistics Center Navy United States Navy NPDES National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System NPDW National Primary Drinking Water Act OSHA Occupational Safety a nd Health Administration OWDF Oily Waste Disposal Facility ORP oxidation-reduction potential PAHs polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons PAL Project Action Level pH potential of hydroge n (hydrogen activity) PID photo-ionization detector PM Project Manager POC Point of Contact PPE personal protective equipment PPM Parsons Project Manager PSHEP Project Safety, Hea lth, and Environment Plan PVC Polyvinyl chloride QA Quality Assurance QA/QC Quality Assurance/ Quality Control QAPP Quality Assurance Project Plan QC Quality Control RCRA Resource Conservation and Recovery Act RHMW Red Hill Monitoring Well RHSF Red Hill Bulk Fuel Storage Facility RI/FS Remedial Investigation/Feasibility Survey RPD relative percent difference RPM Remedial Project Manager SDWA Safe Drinking Water Act SSHO Site Safety and Health Officer TEC The Environmental Company, Inc. TPH Total petroleum hydrocarbons TPH-DRO Total petroleum hydrocar bons-diesel range organics TPH-GRO Total petroleum hydrocar bons-gasoline range organics TPH-RRO Total petroleum hydrocar bons-residual range organics US United States USACE United States Army Corp of EngineersWork Plan/Sampling and Analysis Plan, Monitoring Well Installation vii 

### ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS (Continued)
USCS Unified Soil Classification System USFWS United States Fish and Wildlife Service UST Underground storage tank UTM Universal Transverse Mercator VOA Volatile Organic Analysis VOCs Volatile Organic Compounds WP/SAP Work Plan/Sampling and Analysis PlanWork Plan/Sampling and Analysis Plan, Monitoring Well Installation 1-1 

### SECTION 1 INTRODUCTION This Work/Sampling and Analysis Plan describes the purpose and methodology for installing two groundwater monitoring wells north of the Red Hill Bulk Fuel Storage Facility, Joint Base Pearl Harbor-Hickam (JBPHH), Hawaii, hereafter referred to as the “Facility”. The Facility is part of the JBPHH and is located on the Island of Oahu (F igure 1). The State of Hawaii Department of Health (DOH) Facility I.D. number for the Facility is 9-102271. The HDOH Release I.D. numbers are 990051, 010011, 020028, and 140010. Parsons has prepared this document for Naval Facilities Engin eering Command (NAVFAC) Hawaii, under NAVFAC Pacific Prime Contract No. N62583-11-D-0515/DO KB01.



### 1.1 PROJECT PURPOSE The purpose of this project is to install groundwater monitoring wells near the north perimeter boundary of the Facility to evaluate potential off-site migration of petroleum-related contamination in groundwater and to provide additional monitoring points to determine the distribution of hydraulic head for in put into an existing groundwater mo del of this area. It is the United States Navy’s (Navy) intention to co ntinue compliance with DOH release response requirements for a reported release from Facility Tank 5. These requirements are documented in letters from DOH to the Navy da ted 12 February 2014 and 26 Fe bruary 2014 and are addressed by installing two monitoring wells along the border of the Facility. These locations have been agreed to in subsequent discussi ons and correspondence with the DOH.



### 1.2 LOCATION AND SETTING The Facility is located on th e island of Oahu, Hawaii, approx imately 2.5 miles northeast of Pearl Harbor (Figure 1). The Facility is located on a low ri dge on the western edge of the Koolau Mountain Range that divi des Halawa Valley from Moanalua Valley. The Facility is bordered on the north by Halawa Correctional Facility and privat e businesses, on the west by the U.S. Coast Guard reservation, on the south by residential neighborhoo ds, and on the east by Moanalua Valley. A quarry is located less than a quarter mile away to the northwest. TheWork Plan/Sampling and Analysis Plan, Monitoring Well Installation 1-2 Facility occupies 144 acres and the elevation ranges from approximately 200 to 500 feet above mean sea level (amsl). The Facility is located above the boundary of the Waimalu and Moanalua Aquifer Systems of the Pearl Harbor and Honolul u Aquifer Sector, respectively. Both aquifers are sources of potable water for several public water supply systems, including the Board of Water Supply (BWS) Halawa Shaft Pump Station (2353-01) approximately 3000 feet northwest from the Facility and the Navy Red Hill Pumping Stati on (designated 2254-01), located approximately 2,500 feet hydraulically down-grad ient from the Facility. Information obtained from the City and Count y of Honolulu Department of Planning and Permitting indicates that the Facility is located on federal government land (zoned F1- Military and Federal).



### 1.3 SITE HISTORY The Facility was constructed by the U.S. Go vernment in the early 1940s. The Facility contains 18 active and 2 inactive underground stor age tanks (USTs) that are operated by Naval Supply Fleet Logistics Center (NAVSUP FLC) Pearl Harbor (f ormerly Fleet and Industrial Supply Center [FISC]). The 20 USTs and a series of t unnels were field constructed in -place as a self-contained underground unit deep within a ba salt ridge at Red Hill. The US Ts were constructed of plate steel encased in 2-4 feet of concrete between the steel plate and surrounding basalt. The USTs are 245 feet long and 100 feet in diameter and are a ligned vertically such th at the upper domes of the tanks are between 100 feet and 200 feet be low ground surface (bgs). The lower dome of each tank rests on an approximate 50-foot wide by 20-foot thick concrete pad that was placed prior to the construction of the tanks. The botto ms of the USTs are lo cated between 80 and 100 above the underlying water table. The USTs currently contain jet fuel propellant (J P-5 and JP-8) and marine diesel fuel (F-76). Several tanks in the past have st ored Navy special fuel oil, Navy distillate, aviation gasoline, and motor gasoline (Environet, 2010).
Various environmental activities have been c onducted at the Facility since the late 1990s. Site Investigations (SIs) were conducted in 1996 (Ogden Environmental and Energy Services Co., Inc. [Ogden]), 2002 (AMEC Earth and Envir onmental, Inc. [AMEC]), and 2007 (TEC, Inc.Work Plan/Sampling and Analysis Plan, Monitoring Well Installation 1-3 [TEC]). A groundwater flow and contaminant tr ansport model was comple ted as part of the 2007 TEC investigation and updated in 2010 by TEC. A Groundwater Pr otection Plan (GPP) was developed in 2008 based on results of the SIs, modeling, and Tier 3 Ri sk Assessment, also conducted by TEC in 2007. The GPP was updated in 2009. The Navy has been conducting quarterly samp ling of existing groundwater monitoring wells located inside and outside of the Red Hill tunne l since 2008. Currently, there are four monitoring wells located in the tunnel, one sample point locat ed at the Red Hill Shaf t, and two monitoring wells located outside of the t unnel that are sampled quarterly.



### 1.4 REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS Groundwater sampling of the newly installed monitoring wells will be conducted in accordance with established LTM procedures at th e Facility and applicable federal regulations that include the Resource Conservation and Recove ry Act (RCRA) and Title 29 of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) describing Occupationa l Safety and Health Standards. Based on the history of the Site, the State a nd Federal regulatory requirements that apply to the Facility include the following:

 Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA) and Nati onal Primary Drinking Water Act (NPDW); the NPDW regulations are located in 40 CFR Part 141 and the regulations implement the provisions of the SDWA. They establish th e maximum contaminant levels (MCLs) for various substances in potable water.

 Hawaii Rules Relating to Public Water Systems (HPWS) – The DOH HPWS (Hawaii Administrative Rules (HAR) Title 11, Chapte r 20) sets forth the MCLs of certain chemicals in public and private drinking water systems. These MCLs are analogous to those in the NPDW regulations.

 State of Hawaii UST Regulations (HAR, Title 19, Chapter 342L and HAR, Title 11, Chapter 281). Owners and operato rs of USTs that contain regulated substances such as petroleum are required to take specific actions when investigating releases from their USTs. Regulations and requireme nts are explained in detail in the Technical Guidance Manual for Underground Storage Tank Clos ure and Release Response (DOH, 2000).Work Plan/Sampling and Analysis Plan, Monitoring Well Installation 2-1 

### SECTION 2 PROJECT ORGANIZATION This section provides a summary of the key pr oject personnel, subcon tractors, the project organizational structure, planni ng, schedule, and project safety.



### 2.1 ROLE AND RESPONSIBILITIES A clear understanding of each individual and organization’s role and responsibilities will be instrumental in the completion of this pr oject. Key personnel and organizations for this project are included in Table 1 (tables are provi ded at the end of this work plan). This organizational structure is designed to ensure that all personnel involved with the project will receive proper instructions and information. Appropriate project safety and quality assurance (QA) procedures will be followed. The roles and re sponsibilities of key personnel directly involved with work planning, field, data review, and reporti ng activities are included below. 

### 2.1.1 NAFAC Remedial Project Manager Mr. Bruce Tsutsui is the NAVFAC Remedial Project Manager (RPM) and oversees the Red Hill Phase 1B Monitoring Well Installation pr ogram for NAVFAC and is responsible for providing Navy technical guidance for the project and coordinating access to monitoring well locations. 

### 2.1.2 Battelle Project Manager Ms Carolyn Scala is the Battelle Project Manager (BPM) and is responsible for the overall management of the project and reports to the NAVFAC RPM. Th e BPM is responsible for the operations of the overall project and ensuring activities are conducte d in accordance with the project scope and within contract terms and conditi ons. The BPM will provide management and direction to the project personnel assigned to the project including Parsons and other subcontractors. The BPM is responsible for ensuring completion of the work in accordance with applicable codes and standards, including Battelle corpor ate, Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), and any client-specific requirements, and ensuring compliance withWork Plan/Sampling and Analysis Plan, Monitoring Well Installation 2-2 programs and procedures applicable to the pr oject. The BPM is also responsible for coordination with the NAVFAC RPM. 

### 2.1.3 Parsons Project Manager Mr. Gene Wright, P.G. is the Parsons Projec t Manager (PPM) and is responsible for the management of the work planning, field, and repor ting activities subcontracted to Parsons and reports to the Battelle Project Manager. Th e PPM is responsible for the daily operations of Parsons personnel assigned to th e project and ensuring daily activities are conducted in accordance with the project scope and within subc ontract terms and conditions. The PPM will provide management and direction to the Parsons personne l assigned to the project and subcontractors as directed by Battelle. The PPM is responsible for ensuring completion of the field tasks in accordance with applicable codes and standards, ensuring compliance with environmental, health, and safety requirements, including Parsons corporate, OSHA, and any client-specific requirements, and ensuring complia nce with programs and procedures applicable to the project. In addition, the PPM is also responsible for coordination with the NAVFAC RPM within the scope of the subcontract. 

### 2.1.4 Field Task Manager Mr. Thomas (Mitch) Jensen, P.G., is the Field Task Manager (FM) and reports to the PPM. The FM will be responsible for the management of site activit ies and personnel. The FM is responsible for the following: s upervising site personnel, coordi nating with subcontractors and vendors (as approved by Battelle), ensuring completion of the field tasks in accordance with the contract documents, applicable codes and standards, ensuring compliance with environmental, health, and safety requirements, including Parsons corpor ate, OSHA, and a ny client-specific requirements, and ensuring compliance with programs and procedures applicable to the project. Mr. William Stohler, P.G., and Mr. John Hall, P.G ., P.E., are Alternate FMs and will have the same responsibilities as Mr. Jensen. 

### 2.1.5 Site Safety and Health Officer Mr. Jensen will also serve as Site Safety and Health Officer (SSHO) and has the responsibility and authority to implement the Project Safety, Health, and E nvironment Plan (PSHEP) and to verify compliance. Mr. William Stohler, P.G., is the Alternate SSHO and also has responsibilityWork Plan/Sampling and Analysis Plan, Monitoring Well Installation 2-3 and authority to implement the PSHEP, and to verify compliance. The SSHO or Alternate SSHO has the authority to halt site work if unsafe conditions are detected. The specific responsibilities of the SSHO include managing the safety and health functions on-site; serving as the project’s Point of Cont act (POC) for safety and health matters; ensuring site monitoring, worker training, and effective selec tion and use of personal protective equipment (PPE); assessing site conditions for unsafe acts and conditions and providing corrective action; maintaining effective safety and health records as described in the PSHEP; coordinating with the PPM and others as necessary for safety and health efforts. Mr. Stohler may also serve as the Alternate FM.


### 2.1.6 Chemist Ms Tammy Chang is the Project Chemist is responsible for reviewing analytical data to ensure that the data meet the data qualit y objectives for the proj ect. Upon receipt of analytical data from Battelle, Ms. Chang or designated al ternate will perform a check to verify that contract deliverables have been met; will perfor m a review of sample custody, receipt conditions, and holding times; and will perform a revi ew of sample results (including limits of quantitation and results for field duplicates). The Project Chemist will be responsible for communicating any deviations from the Work Plan to the BPM and PPM. The chemist will work with the BPM and PPM to make any decisions based on laboratory Quality Assurance/Qu ality Control (QA/QC) issues. 

### 2.1.7 QA Manager The BPM and PPM will serve as QA Managers and will be responsible for implementing and maintaining the QA program; monitoring QA activities to ensure conformance with authorized policies, procedures, and sound practices; conduct meetings with personnel covering the QA procedures and requirements, as appropriate; identi fying and resolving non-conformances in accordance with the requirements of appli cable procedures and policies; monitoring corrective action documentation for conditions advers e to quality; trac king and verifying implementation of corrective actions; providing clos eout documentation upon completion of corrective action; ensuring that records, logs , permits, regulatory-required documentation, manufacturers’ instructions, warrantees, st andard procedures, and project plans are maintained and stored in aWork Plan/Sampling and Analysis Plan, Monitoring Well Installation 2-4 retrievable manner and that controlled copies of standard proce dures and project plans are available to appropriate personnel.


### 2.1.8 Subcontractors All subcontractors will report to the BPM and furnish all personnel, equipment, and materials required to complete their tasks. Th e inspection and approval of all subcontracted work will be the responsibility of Parsons on behalf of Battelle.



### 2.2 PLANNING The BPM and PPM are responsible for the proj ect set-up and planning. The planning tasks include the following.

 Obtaining RAPIDGate or temporary secur ity passes for all pe rsonnel and vehicles requiring access to the Facility and surrounding pr operties. All member of the field team will have a valid background check including fingerprinting, as required by NAVFAC Hawaii, prior to commencing any fieldwork.

 Acquiring additional information which in cludes utility maps, as-built drawings and record drawings, historical data, and any other pertinent information.

 Obtaining all federal, state, and local permits and approvals required to perform the fieldwork.

 Identifying the staging and decontamination area, and material storage.

 Attending site visits and other meetings.

 Preparing and submitting draft and final planning documents prior to initiating fieldwork.


### 2.3 PERMITTING All work will be perfor med in compliance with all applicable federal regulations. In addition, the work will be performed to meet the requ irements of state and local laws, rules, and regulations.



### 2.4 PROJECT SCHEDULE
Fieldwork will be scheduled between Monda y and Friday, between the hours of 0700 to 1700 hours. Parsons assumes normal work schedule a ccess within the security fence perimeter of theWork Plan/Sampling and Analysis Plan, Monitoring Well Installation 2-5 Facility and neighboring properties. The project schedule is provi ded in Appendix A. The task on the schedule specific to this work plan is Task D, Field Work Phase 1B – Monitoring Well Installation. As shown on the sc hedule, it is anticipated that field work will commence on or before 1 September 2014 and be comple ted on or about 7 November 2014. The sequence and estimated durati on of the drilling program is an ticipated to be as follows:

 Conduct site preparation to include vegetati on clearance and installation of a temporary perimeter fence;

 Drill location (1) shown on Figure 2 first a nd allow three weeks for drilling and well installation and development;

 Drill location (2) shown on Figure 2 and allow three weeks for drilling and well installation and development;

 Sample wells, and;

 Survey well locations; and

 Restore site to include permanent perimeter fence. Additional drilling and fencing de tails are provided in Section 3.



### 2.5 HEALTH AND SAFE TY REQUIREMENTS All members of the field team are required to read, and sign the PSHEP as verification that they understand the plan. Parsons will take a ll necessary measures to provide a safe work environment during field activities. The PSHEP in cludes appropriate Activity Hazard Analyses, and outlines personnel risk minimization thr ough compliance with OSHA and the U.S. Army Corp of Engineers (USACE) safety regulati ons. The PSHEP is pr ovided as Appendix B.Work Plan/Sampling and Analysis Plan, Monitoring Well Installation 3-1 

### SECTION 3 FIELD ACTIVITIES AND METHODOLOGY This section comprises the Facility sampli ng and analysis plan and describes the preinvestigation activities, drilling, well installation, developmen t, soil and groundwater sampling, and related procedures to inst all two monitoring wells at the Facilit y. Field activities are proposed that utilize field screening technologi es and appropriate real-time co mmunication and decision-making, if needed. Therefore, the work plan is intended to be flexible to adapt to unforeseen conditions.



### 3.1 PRE-INVESTIGATION ACTIVITIES Pre-investigation activities to be completed prior to and/or concur rent with field mobilization are described in this subsection. The two proposed m onitoring wells are located within the Facility property boundary. Pre-inves tigation activities include:
1. Conducting site reconnaissan ce surveys, including:

 Inspecting drill locations for aboveground and buried utilities, temporary fence layout, vegetation clearance, and drill rig set-up area and configuration needed for all drilling equipment and support vehicles.

 Reviewing available maps showing utilitie s in the area of the drilling locations.

 Identifying site-specific hazards and performi ng hazards analysis assessments to protect employees, subcontractors, visitors, and JBPH H personnel from any potential job-related accidents and injuries during field work.
2. Obtaining NAVFAC clearances and approvals, a nd generating traffic control plans. The following clearance, approvals, and plan may be required:

 Temporary fence installation appr oval from Physical Security.

 Realigned permanent fence appr oval from Physical Security.

 Informal traffic control plan, which include s drawings and traffic control management (signs).
3. Locating underground utilities. The Hawaii One Call Center (phone : 866-423-7287) will be the initial contact point for util ity clearances for pub lic utilities that may cross Navy property. However, the following types of ut ilities and responsible entities may also be contacted in the process of obtaining clearances for public utilities that may cr oss Navy property:Work Plan/Sampling and Analysis Plan, Monitoring Well Installation 3-2  Municipal Water/Sewer (City and County of Honolulu, Board of Water Supply)

 Electric (Hawaiian Electric Company)

 Natural Gas (The Gas Company)

 Telephone/Communications (H awaiian Telcom/AT&T) In addition, drilling locations wi ll be cleared by a geophysical utility locating subcontractor.

4. Implementing best management practices. A Na tional Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit is required if dire ct or indirect discha rge to storm drains is anticipated and if the area affected by site clearance operations is larger than one acre. A NPDES permit will not be required for the site activities being conduc ted. There will be no direct or indirect discharges to storm drains and substantially less than one acre of ground will be affected by site clearance operations . Best management practices will be implemented, including but not limited to: preservation of existing vegetati on where possible; using waste (trash) and investigation-derived waste (IDW) containers; street sweeping; and dust suppression of drill cuttings.

5. Abiding by the National Historic Preservation Act. The Nationa l Historic Preservation Act, Section 106 [36 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 800], requires fede ral agencies to take into account the effects of thei r undertakings on historic prope rties and afford a reasonable opportunity to comment on such undertakings. As part of pre-investigat ion activities for this project, Section 106 was discussed with th e NAVFAC Environmenta l Cultural Resource personnel. As a result of this discussion, a Section 106 compliance request is not required.

6. Abiding by the Endangered Species Act. The Endangered Species Act, Section 7, requires federal agencies to take into account the eff ects of their undertakings on endangered species. As part of pre-investigation activities for this project, site conditions and endangered species issues were discussed with the NAVFAC Envir onmental Natural Resources personnel. As a result of this discussion, a Section 7 compliance request is not required.



### 3.2 SCOPE OF FI ELD ACTIVITIES Field work at Facility is scheduled to begin on or before September 1, 2014. The work will include:

 Site and drilling location preparation and planning;Work Plan/Sampling and Analysis Plan, Monitoring Well Installation 3-3  Rock coring and geologic logging including field screening, corehole reaming, and installation of monitoring wells in the Pearl Harbor Basal Aquifer at two locations along and near the north lower access road within the Facility property boundary;

 Sampling soil/saprolite to the competent ba salt contact at both monitoring wells for logging descriptions, field screening, and pot ential laboratory analys is of samples for contaminants of potential concern (COPCs);

 Sampling core for potential labor atory analysis of basalt for CO PCs if visible staining or odor is detected;

 Determining well deviation with downhole instruments;

 Sounding the monitoring wells for groundwater elevation and poten tial free product and making any necessary corrections to water le vels based on the well deviation and/or presence of free product;

 Casing off overburden sediments from the be drock within the boreholes to facilitate coring/drilling and to mitigate potential vertical migration of contamination to groundwater;

 Constructing above-ground wellhead completions with concrete pads, protective bollards, and secure, tamper-proof protective casings;

 Developing monitoring wells, installi ng dedicated bladder pumps, and sampling groundwater monitoring wells for potential COPCs;

 Surveying monitoring wells to establish north ing and easting coordinates and elevations;

 Managing IDW generated during the dr illing and sampling activities; and

 Restoring the drilling locations.


### 3.3 ANALYTICAL METHODS AND REGU LATORY COMPARIS ON CRITERIA The soil and groundwater samples collected for labor atory analysis will be analyzed for gasoline and diesel range TPH, volatil e organic compounds (VOCs), polyc yclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) to include naphthalenes, and dissolved lead. Groundwater also will be analyzed for methane and the general water chemistry anions. The co rresponding soil and groundwater analytical methods are provided in Table 2 - Soil Analytical Methods, Project Action Limits, and Laboratory Specific Limits and in Table 3 - Groundwater Analytical Methods, Project Action Limits, and Laboratory Specific Limits. DOH environmental action levels (EALs) for so il and groundwater will be used for comparison purposes (DOH, 2012) and are provided in Table 2 - Soil Analytical Methods, Project Action Limits and Laboratory Specific Limits and in Table 3 - Groundwater Analytical Methods, Project Action Limits and Laboratory Specific Limits.Work Plan/Sampling and Analysis Plan, Monitoring Well Installation 3-4 

### 3.4 DRILLING LOCATION ACCESS, SI TE PREPARATION, AND FENCING Proposed drilling locations along the lower access road will requ ire varying degrees of site preparation to include installation of a temporar y security fence and pe rimeter security fence removal (discussed below), vegetation removal, site grooming if needed, and permanent reconfiguration of the perimeter fence to incorporate the new monitoring wells and allow future access for groundwater sampling activi ties. In addition to vegetati on removal, the area may be groomed to remove tire hazards, and the ground surface graded or filled as needed to provide a level base for the drill rigs if the ground slope is greate r than leveling timbers can correct. Additionally, vegetation including trees must be cleared a minimum of 10 feet away from the outside of the temporary of the temporary fence per NAVFAC security requirements. The following sequence for temporary secur ity fence installation will be followed.

1. The temporary security fence will be installe d completely before taking down the permanent perimeter security fence. The temporary fence area will allow sufficient space to accommodate drill rigs, support vehicles, and IDW roll-off c ontainers without encroaching onto the access road. The temporary fence posts will be driven approximately tw o feet into the ground rather than boring holes and placing posts in concrete as done for permanent posts. Physical Security will approve these temporary fencing assumptions or provide alternatives for construction. The drill site area and temporary security fence configurations will depend on ground conditions and how the drill rigs will be oriented relative to the existing security fence. The drill rig orientations may be approximately para llel or perpendicular to the existing security fence. The temporary fence panels will be 13 feet wide by 6 feet tall

2. After the temporary security fence is installed, the permanent fence fabric will be rolled back and the fence posts will be cut flush with the co ncrete. Only a necessary number of posts will be removed for equipment access.

3. Perform the required drilling, installation of th e monitoring well, and completion of the well with a reinforced concrete pad (2 feet thick) , steel protective casing a nd cap with protective hood for the lock, and steel bollard s at each corner of the concrete pad. The monitoring well will be sampled prior to permanent security fence reconstruction.

4. Prior to the temporary security fence removal, the new security fence configuration will be marked around the monitoring well. The concrete around the cut-off posts that will be neededWork Plan/Sampling and Analysis Plan, Monitoring Well Installation 3-5 for the new construction will be hammered out a few inches below ground surface, the cut posts will be welded back on, and new concrete will be poured around the reinstalled posts. The new concrete will extend above the weld so the weld will not be visible.

5. The new security fencing around the monitori ng well will be constructed approximately perpendicular to existing security fence line. The fencing around the monitoring well and up to the existing fence line will be attached to new posts set in bored holes and concrete. The existing security fence will be rolled back to the new fence corner posts at the entrance to the monitoring well access. The reconstructed permanent perimeter fence will be built in accordance with Navy fencing specifications.

6. After the reconstructed permanent perimeter fen ce is in place, the temporary fence and posts will be taken down and removed from the drilling locations and Facility.



### 3.5 TRAFFIC CONTROL Traffic control will be implemented as necessar y. A minimum 12-foot cl earance is required for emergency access along the lower access road. Traffi c cones and signs (if wa rranted) will be placed along the roadway near the drilling operations to provide warning to JBPHH personnel and contractors of work al ong the lower access road.


### 3.6 DRILLING, WELL INSTALLA TION, AND SAMPLE COLLECTION ACTIVITIES Monitoring wells will be drilled and installed at the approximate loca tions shown on Figure 2. The locations may be moved as required from the shown locations due to the actual ground conditions and siting concerns related to drill ri g set up and orientation, and safety. Proposed monitoring wells 1 and 2 will be installed near the lower access road north of the permanent security fence. The anticipated drilling depths of the wells are approximately 300 feet bgs. 

### 3.6.1 Drilling and Soil Sampling A Mobile B-59 or similar drill ri g will used to advance hollow- stem augers (HSAs) into the incompetent soil/saprolite overlying basalt and for rock coring in basalt ben eath the soil/saprolite. A larger, air rotary drilling rig (Atl as Copco T3 or Mobile B90) will be used to enlarge the boreholes within the soil/saprolite to set 12-inch-diameter c onductor casing and to enla rge the coreholes to 8-Work Plan/Sampling and Analysis Plan, Monitoring Well Installation 3-6 inch diameter for installation of monitoring well s. Conductor casing will be grouted in place from the bedrock surface to ground surface. 

### 3.6.1.1 Hollow Stem Auger Initially, the boreholes will be ad vanced to refusal using HSAs and soil core samples will be collected at 10-foot intervals with 2-inch-d iameter split spoons. Near-surface petroleum contamination is not expected at these downgrad ient locations; however, if high photo-ionization detector (PID) readings, petroleu m odor, visual staining, or other in dications of soil contamination are encountered, soil samples will be collected and submitted for laboratory chemical analysis. PID screening results, logging informati on, and depth of auger refusal will be recorded in the field book and computer-generated geologic logs with all pertinent information will be constructed. The depth of auger refusal could be shallow, depending on the location and subs urface conditions. For instance, if basalt boulders were to be encountered or if saprolite contains competent layers, augering will not be possible. Conductor casing will be set at the depth of auger refusal or the larger, air rotary drilling rig will be utilized to further extend the depth of the conductor casing. Soil/saprolite will be described according to standard logging procedures using the unified soil classification system (USCS) and a MunsellTM soil color ch art will be used for co lor determination. If soil samples are collected, soil samples for VO C analysis for benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, and xylenes (BTEX) will be collected in EnCore ® samplers. Samples for other analyses will be collected in analyte appropriate containers supplied by the laboratory. So il samples will be handled in accordance with the quality assurance project plan (QAPP) in Section 4. 

### 3.6.1.2 Rock Coring Rock coring will commence at the depth where competent bedrock is contacted. Because the proposed monitoring wells (1 and 2) are located n ear or within a natural drainage, a substantial thickness of saprolite and/or alluvi um may be encountered. If the thickness of this material extends much greater than 50 feet bgs such that the conductor casing also extends to this depth, coring within the conductor casing becomes difficu lt due to wobble of the rock cori ng drill stem w ithin the largediameter conductor casing. In the event that this potential wobble cannot be overcome, rock coring may not be possible, unless a sepa rate borehole is drille d with small diametercasing installed.
Continuous rock cores will be obtained in a 5 -foot-long HQ core barrel (approximate 4-inch outside diameter yielding an approximate 2.75 inch rock core) using a wireline and quad-latch retrieval system. Rock coring wi ll advance to a depth of approxi mately 20 feet below the waterWork Plan/Sampling and Analysis Plan, Monitoring Well Installation 3-7 table. Compressed air will be used for circulati on fluid at shallower depths. Compressed air mixed with clean, potable water will be used for the circulation fluid at increasing depths. An accessible source of potable water will be required for rock co ring and drilling use. This source of clean water may be an on-site Navy fire hydrant or off-site BWS fire hydrant. The potable water will be analyzed prior to use. A 55-gallon drum with an ai r stack filter on the top w ill be used to catch and mitigate fine drilling dust.
Rock cores will be described in accordance with standard logging procedures. A summary rock core chart will be used in the field as a guide to aid in the descriptions. In general, rock color; texture; strength; degree and orie ntation of fracturing; shape, si ze and volume of voids; weathering; and secondary staining or mineralization will be no ted on the geologic logs. The Geological Society of America rock color chart with MunsellTM color chips will be used for color determination. Lithologic descriptions, PID scr eening results and other observati ons will be provided on a geologic log. 

### 3.6.1.3 Air Rotary The coreholes will be reamed or over-drilled to 8- inch diameter. The borehole will be advanced to total depth using conventional, open-hole air rotary with an air hammer. A diverter will be bolted to the top of the conductor casing to discharge entrai ned air, water, and rock cuttings via a large hose to a cyclone mounted on a roll-off bin. Li mited amounts of clean, potable water and environmentally safe drilling foam (as required) w ill be injected during drilling to mitigate dust and to increase fluidization to remove cuttings from th e boreholes. Cuttings return using this method can be variable, therefore, limiting th e ability to log the rock form ation where rock coring is not conducted. 

### 3.6.2 Monitoring Well Installation The monitoring wells will be installed in basalt a nd screened within the basal aquifer. Four-inch diameter, Schedule 80 polyvinyl chloride (PVC) mon itoring wells with 20 feet of 0.020-inch slotted, Schedule 80 PVC screens will be constructed within the 8-inch boreholes. The 20-foot screens will straddle the water table such that about 15 feet of screen is below the water table and 5 feet is above to allow for water level fluctuation. The wireline on the Mobile B-59 or si milar drilling rig will be used to place the sections of sc reen and blank casing. Additiona lly, a 1-inch diameter PVC sounding tube for the purpose of measuring water levels will be attached to the outside of each well casing and placed with the well during constr uction. The sounding tubes will be slotted and screened over the same interval as the monitoring wells. A sounding tube is necessary to obt ain accurate water levelsWork Plan/Sampling and Analysis Plan, Monitoring Well Installation 3-8 because the tape of a water leve l indicator can become entangled in the dedicated-pump sample tubing within the well. Depth to water in the open well casing (prior to pump installation) and in the sounding tube will be measured and compared and a ny differences will be not ed. For consistency, all water levels will be measured w ith the same water level indicator. Coarse #3 Monterey silica sand will be tremied in the borehol e annulus beneath, within, and approximately 5 to 8 feet above the well screen, fo llowed by a bentonite pellet seal, then bentonite chips or viscous, wet bentonite grout up to the bo ttom of the conductor casi ng (less viscous cementbentonite grout should not be used because of high rock porosity). Dry bentonite pellets and chips where used will be tremied and hydr ated with clean, potable water. The annular space between the well casing and conductor cas ing will be finished with cement-bent onite grout to near surface. Well construction diagrams will be provided on the geologic logs. The monitoring wells will be completed about 2.5- feet above ground with an 8-inch-diameter steel protective casing fitted with a locking, tamper proof lid that covers the protective casing and well head. The lock will be recessed or covered fo r added protection. The steel casings will be set in concrete at the wellhead for strength, securit y, and to provide a surface seal. A 3.5-foot by 3.5- foot square by 2-foot-thick conc rete pad will be instal led around each protective steel casing. Steel bollards (4) will be placed slightly beyond each corner of the pa d. The bollards will extend below ground surface about 2 feet and above ground surface ab out 3 feet with each individually set in concrete. The protective steel ca sings also will extend about 3 feet above ground so there is about 6 inches of clearance between the wellhead and lock ing lid. Coarse sand will be poured into the space between the well and protective casin g to a level of about 6 inches below the wellhead. The bollards and protective steel casing will be painted bright yellow for high visibility. 

### 3.6.3 Monitoring Well Development, Pump Installation and Groundwater Sampling 3.6.3.1 Monitoring Well Development Monitoring well development will consist of su rging and bailing groundwater until fines are removed and the water clarifies. This normally occurs between a minimum of five well volumes and a maximum of 10 well volumes and ensures that form ation water enters the well and that the water affected by drilling is removed. The paramete rs of dissolved oxygen (DO), oxidation-reduction potential (ORP), potential of hydrogen (pH), temper ature, specific conductance, and turbidity will be monitored during the development cycle. Beca use DO and ORP are affected by the agitation of surging and bailing, the values ob tained for these parameters duri ng development may vary. If the development water is not relatively clear and sediment free after 10 well volumes, it will be assumedWork Plan/Sampling and Analysis Plan, Monitoring Well Installation 3-9 that further development will not be beneficial, and development will end. Development activities will be recorded in the field book and computer ge nerated well development forms with all pertinent information will be constructed. 

### 3.6.3.2 Dedicated Groundwater Pump System Installation Dedicated pneumatic bladder pump sampling system s will be installed in each monitoring well after well development. The sampling system will consist of a stainless-steel bladder pump with the screen intake 3-feet below the top of the pump, sm all-diameter teflon coated stainless steel safety cable, 1/4-inch inside-diameter by 3/8-inch outside-diameter polyeth ylene air and discharge tubing, and a well cap assembly with fittings. The bl adder pumps will be installed with the intake approximately 8 feet below the wate r table to allow for a decrease in water table elevation. The predetermined, exact length of tubing and safety cabl e will be requested when ordered. Cable ties will be applied about every 10 feet to secure the tubing to the safety cable. Pump installation will require two or more workers to lower the pump assembly into the well. The sampling ports of the bladder pump system terminate in a PVC pl ate and are part of a well cap asse mbly that consists of the plate and a 4-inch sleeve. This sleeve assembly slips over the 4-inch well casing at the wellhead. The sounding tubes will be finished at approximately the same elevation datum as the well cap assembly. All water level measurements will be from the sounding tube measuring-point datum. 

### 3.6.3.3 Groundwater Depth Monitoring, Purging, and Sampling Depths to groundwater will be measured with a water level interface pr obe through the sounding tubes installed with each well. Because the monitori ng wells will be installed at depths greater than 200 feet bgs, vertical deviation of monitoring wells will be meas ured after development using a WellNavTM (or similar) centralized camera system provided and opera ted by the drilling contractor. Deviations of less than 3 degrees are expected. Groundwater elevations will be corrected if need, based on the measured deviations. This is necessary to obtain more accurate groundwater elevations for evaluation of hydraulic head. Groundwater purging and sampling with a bladder pump is a low flow or micropurge technique that is considered applicable for use in permeable formations that have minimal water level drawdown, such as in the Pearl Harbor Basal Aqui fer. For this techni que, water level drawdown should be less than approximately 0.33 foot duri ng purging. Drawdown measured in the monitoring wells during purging is anticipated to be ne gligible because of high formation permeability. Low flow purging requires water in the well to be in equ ilibrium with the aquifer formation and flow into the pump intake to be horizontal and laminar so that mixing from turbulence does not occur.Work Plan/Sampling and Analysis Plan, Monitoring Well Installation 3-10 Therefore, this technique minimizes disturbance in the well screen and aquifer, which reduces turbidity, aeration, mixing, and loss of VOCs. The pumping flow rates should av erage about 0.5 liters per pump cycle, which is within the acceptable range of 0.1- to 0.5-liters pe r minute (L/min) for low flow purging

. Liquefied nitrogen gas will be used as the compresse d gas source for operation of the bl adder pumps. It is anticipated that one or two large bottles of compressed gas w ill be needed to complete the purge and sample cycle including collecting quality assu rance/quality control (QA/QC) samples. During purging the water quality parameters of DO, ORP, temperature, pH, specific conductance, and turbidity will be measured and recorded. These groundwater sampling parameters will be measured continuously through use of a flow-thru cell connected to a U-52 multi-parameter meter, or similar meter. The sampling parameters a nd other pertinent sampli ng information will be included on the groundwater sampling form that is provided in Appendix C. Stabilization of the water quality parameters is the criterion for sample collection. Samples will be collected after three successive measurements of the water quality fi eld parameters have st abilized according to the criteria shown on the groundwater sampling form. It is anticipated that about 5 gallons of water will be purged from each well. Following purging, the flow-through cell will be bypassed so that samples are collected directly from the pump disc harge line. Approximately 1.25 gallons (5 liters) of water will be collected for each sample set. In total, about 6.25 gallons will be removed from each well during the low-flow purging and sampling process. Groundwater samples will be analyzed for the COPCs listed on the groundwater sampling Form (Appendix C). The analytical me thods, container types and volum es, and preservation also are shown on the form. Additional details incl uding holding times are provided on Table 4. Only initial baseline samples will be collecte d from the monitoring wells after installation and development to determine if contamination is present. Results of the initial samples will be provided in a data summary report. Future monitori ng and frequency will be determined by NAVFAC pending the analytical groundwater results.


### 3.7 SAMPLE IDENTIFICATION, HANDLING, AND SHIPPING Soil and groundwater samples will be identified on sample containers and on the chain-of-custody (CoC) forms in accordance with the existing site prot ocol and nomenclature. The last well installed at the Facility was RHMW05. Therefore, the next wells installed will be RHMW06 and RHMW07. Soil samples will be designated with an SO identif ier followed by the sample depth. For example,Work Plan/Sampling and Analysis Plan, Monitoring Well Installation 3-11 RHMW06-SO-10 indicates a soil samp le collected at 10 feet bgs. Groundwater samples will be designated with a GW identifier followed by th e sequential sample number. For example, RHMW06-GW-01 indicates the first groundwater sample from well RHMW06. Standard COC protocol will be maintained dur ing sample collection, handling, management, and shipment to the laboratory. Soil and water samples will be kept on ice after collection to keep them cool (4 +/-2 degrees Celsius [°C]) and packaged in coolers to be shipped to the laboratory as expeditiously as possible (normally the same day of collection). The EnCore ® soil samples, if collected, which require preservation to 0°C, will be packed with dry ice to keep them frozen following collection and during tran sportation. With the exception of coolers containing dry ice, a temperature blank (a vial filled with distilled water) will be included in every cooler to determine the internal temperature of the cool er upon receipt at the laboratory. Soil samples and water samples will be shipped separately, and the samples for VOC analysis will be combined in one cooler and shipped with a trip blank. All samples will be shi pped to APPL Inc. in Clovis, California via Federal Express for the earliest next day delivery to ensure th at the samples arrive at the proper temperature. Copies of the laboratory provided CoC with signatures will be retained for verification and documentation. The field manager will coordinate shipment to the laboratory, and the project manager will contact the laboratory to determine any discrepancies or deficiencies upon receipt of the samples.


### 3.8 EQUIPMENT DECONTAMINATION All down-hole-drilling and sampli ng tools will be cleaned prior to and after each use. A previously used staging area near the Adit 3 entrance at the Facility or anot her acceptable location will be used for decontamination. Liquids will be captured and containerized in properly labeled DOT approved 55-gallon drums or other suitable temporary containers.



### 3.9 INVESTIGATION-DERI VED WASTE MANAGEMENT IDW will include soil and rock cuttings genera ted during borehole drilling operations, well development and purge water, and decontamination water. Non-hazardous waste labels with the required labeling information will be placed on th e IDW containers. These labels will include contract information, site activity, date, conten ts, project type, comments, and NAVFAC contact information. IDW will be properly disposed of pending analytical results. Off-site disposal will be coordinated with the NAVFAC environmental direct orate for approval and si gning of non-hazardousWork Plan/Sampling and Analysis Plan, Monitoring Well Installation 3-12 waste manifests. Documentation will be maintained and included as required in the applicable reports.



### 3.10 SURVEYING Surveying of the monitoring wells and other pertinen t site features will be performed as needed. The monitoring wells will be survey ed after individual completion, or after they are both installed, and tied into an established control point at the Facility. Northing and easting coordinates will be referenced to the Universal Transverse Mercator (UTM) projection and gr id system (Zone 4). Ground surface and well datum elevations (in feet) will be referenced to mean sea level. The survey data will be provided on the geol ogic and well constructi on logs and compiled in a data table.Work Plan/Sampling and Analysis Plan, Monitoring Well Installation 4-1 

### SECTION 4 QUALITY ASSURANCE PROJECT PLAN This QAPP further defines the sampling and analysis discussed in Section 3 with procedures and methods incorporated. The QAPP includes the discussions of the following:

 Summary of the data quality objectives (DQO) process,

 QA/QC sampling and sample handling procedures,

 Laboratory QC,

 Field QC,

 Analytical data quality review,

 Data reporting and documentation,

 Oversight and assessment, and

 Corrective action. This QAPP is based on the previously approv ed work plan/sampling and analysis plan prepared by ESI (2012).


### 4.1 SUMMARY OF THE DATA QU ALITY OBJECTIVES PROCESS The overall sampling and analysis strategy was developed using the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Guidance for Quality Assurance Project Plans, EPA QA/G-5, Quality Assurance Management Systems (EPA, 2001).


### 4.1.1 Statement of the Problem Petroleum constituents have been detected in gr oundwater beneath the USTs at the Facility at concentrations above DOH EALs. These cons tituents may have the potential to impact groundwater production wells in the area. 

### 4.1.2 Identify the Goals The purpose of this project is to provide mo nitoring locations near the north perimeter boundary of the Facility to ev aluate potential off-site mi gration of petroleum-related contamination in groundwater and to provide additional monitoring points to determine the distribution of hydraulic head for input into an existing groundwater model of this area.Work Plan/Sampling and Analysis Plan, Monitoring Well Installation 4-2 

### 4.1.3 Identify the Information The decisions will be made by comparing the groundwater analytical results to the DOH EALs for a site where groundwater is a cu rrent or potential drinking water source and a surface water body is located gr eater than 150 meters from the site (DOH, 2012). The Project Action Levels (PALs) are the mo st conservative of either the drinking water toxicity level or the gross contamination level and were previously agreed upon by the DOH and Navy for the Red Hill LTM program (ESI, 2012). The PA Ls for soil and groundwater are provided in Tables 2 and 3, respectively. 

### 4.1.4 Define the Boundaries of the Study The monitoring is limited to one round of baseline groundw ater sampling of the new monitoring wells to be located within the Facility along the nor thern perimeter fence and lower access road. 

### 4.1.5 Develop the Analytical Approach

 If COPC concentrations at a groundwater m onitoring well exceeds the screening criteria, then the potential risk to groundwater exposure needs to be evaluated.

 If COPC concentrations in groundwater do not exceed the screening criteria, then further monitoring needs to be conducted and fate a nd transport of COPCs in groundwater need to be evaluated. 

### 4.1.6 Specify Performance Acceptance Criteria The probability of procedural errors will be controlled through the consistent application of the standard sampling and analysis procedures and sound data quality management. 

### 4.1.7 Develop the Plan for Obtaining Data The monitoring well locations were chosen based upon previous investigations and monitoring, and groundwater modeling requirements. The analytical met hods and criteria are presented in subsequent sections. Also discussed are field and laboratory QA, data management, and data evaluation.Work Plan/Sampling and Analysis Plan, Monitoring Well Installation 4-3 

### 4.2 QA/QC SAMPLING AND SA MPLE HANDLING PROCEDURES All QA/QC sampling and sampling handling pro cedures will be perf ormed in accordance Technical Guidance Manual for Undergr ound Storage Tank Closure and Release Response (DOH, 2000). 

### 4.2.1 Sample Collection Method Collection and handling procedures have been designed to ensure that project personnel will be able to collect, label, preserve, and transport sample s in a consistent manner to maintain sample integrity for the intended purposes. Field activities will be perf ormed in accordance with the procedures described in Section 3. Analytes, sample containers, preservation, and holding times for water samples are provided in Table 4. Groundw ater samples collected for dissolved lead analysis will be field filtered. 

### 4.2.2 Field QC Samples The field QC samples for this project will consist of duplicates, matrix spike/matrix spike duplicates (MS/MSDs), and trip blanks. 

### 4.2.2.1 Duplicates Field duplicate samples are used to document th e overall precision of the sample collection program. Field duplicate samples will be collected at a minimum of ten percent. The field duplicate sample will be assigned a unique id entification number. The duplicate will be analyzed for the same parameters as project samples.


### 4.2.2.2 MS/MSD Laboratory MS and MSD analysis are used to assess analytical accuracy and precision in response to potential matrix interfere nce. If all of the MS and MSD recoveries are within specified ranges, then all the data is considered accurate. 

### 4.2.2.3 Trip Blanks Trip blanks are used to de tect VOC contamination attri butable to shipping and field handling procedures. The trip blanks will be pr epared by the analytical laboratory using reagent grade water in 40 milliliter volat ile organic analysis (VOA) vials. Trip blanks will accompany every cooler that contain samples to be analyzed for VOCs and TPH-GRO. The trip blanks willWork Plan/Sampling and Analysis Plan, Monitoring Well Installation 4-4 travel with the cooler from th e analytical laboratory to the fi eld and will be returned to the analytical laboratory along with the project samples. The trip blanks will be analyzed for the same VOCs and TPH-GRO as the project samples with which they are shipped. 

### 4.2.3 Sample Containers The groundwater samples for chemical analyses w ill be placed in the sample containers listed in Table 4, preserved as indicat ed, and analyzed within the hol ding times. These containers, preservatives, and holding times are specified in the respective analytical methods. The contract laboratory will supply the required sample containers. 

### 4.2.4 Sample Labeling Soil and groundwater samples will be identifie d on sample containers and on the CoC forms in accordance with the existing site protocol and nomenclature as described in Section 3.7. The new wells installed at the Site will be identified as RHMW06 and RHMW07.


### 4.2.5 Field Instrument Calibration/Documentation The following activities and documentation will be performed and maintained for all field equipment requiring periodic calibration:

 Electronic equipment requiring calibration will be calibrated prior to use by those persons directly responsible for the equipm ent, such as the field staff.

 Field equipment will be checked daily to verify that all of the equipment is calibrated according to the manufacturer’s instructions and is operating properly prior to use.

 Field equipment that has been dropped, damaged, or is believed to be inaccurate will be tagged as in operable, removed from servic e and recalibrated. Field equipment that cannot be repaired or recalibrated will be replaced.

 Documentation pertinent to the calibration and maintenance of field equipment will be maintained in a bound field logbook. Entries made into the logbook regarding the status of field equipment will contain, but are not necessarily limited to, the following information:

o Date, time, and calibration readings;

o Name of person conducting calibration; and

o Type of field equipment being serv iced and identification number (e.g., serial number) and refere nce standard used for calibration (e.g., pH of buffer solution).Work Plan/Sampling and Analysis Plan, Monitoring Well Installation 4-5 The field logbook or photocopies of applicable pa ges will be made part of the permanent project record upon completion of the project.



### 4.3 LABORATORY REQUIREMENTS All laboratory activities will be performed in accordance with the Department of Defense (DoD) Quality Systems Manual for Environmen tal Laboratories, Version 4.2 (DoD, 2010). 

### 4.3.1 Project Analytes Analytical data will be ge nerated using EPA methodologies published in “Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste, Physical/Chemical Methods SW-846” (EPA, 1996). The following analytical methods will be us ed during this investigation:

 TPH-GRO – EPA Method 8015B;

 TPH-DRO – EPA Method 8015B;

 VOCs – EPA Method 8260B;

 PAHs – EPA Method 8270C SIM;

 Dissolved Lead – EPA Method 6020;

 Methane – RSK SOP 175

 Alkalinity – EPA 310.1

 Sulfate – EPA 9056A

 Nitrate/Nitrite as N – EPA Method 353.2. Standard sample preparation and extraction pr ocedures for each analytical method will be used by the laboratory. Soil samples, if collected for VOC, PAH, and the TPH hydrocarbon fraction range analyses, will be analyzed by th e same methods as the water samples with the same holding times. 

### 4.3.2 Reporting Limits Reporting limits are established by the laborator y based on the limits of quantitation (LOQs), historical data, and EPA limits established for the analytical methods employed. The reporting limits for samples may require adjustment due to the matrix interference or if high analyte concentrations necessitate sample dilution before analysis. Matrix interference and sample dilutions have the effect of increasing the re porting limits. Failure to meet the specifiedWork Plan/Sampling and Analysis Plan, Monitoring Well Installation 4-6 reporting limits will be described in the sample delivery group case narrative and summarized in the data review reports.


### 4.4 ANALYTICAL DATA QUALITY REVIEW Data quality will be assessed by evaluating the accuracy, precision, representativeness, completeness, comparability, and sensitivity parameters. 

### 4.4.1 Accuracy Accuracy is defined as the degree of agreement of a measurement to an accepted reference or true value. When applied to a set of obser ved values or measurements, accuracy will be a combination of random and systematic error. An alytical accuracy will be defined as the percent recovery of an analyte in a reference standard or spiked sample. Accuracy limits for laboratory control samples are established by individual laboratories. The acceptance criteria for accuracy are dependent on the analytical method, and are base d on historical laborato ry data. Failure to meet the accuracy limits will be described in the sample delivery group as a case narrative and summarized in the data review reports. The percent differences of the continuing cali bration are also an indication of accuracy. Sample results are qualified “UJ” for non-detects and “J” for detect s, if the percent differences for a continuing calibration is out of the acceptable range, this will be reported by the laboratory in the analytical analysis.


### 4.4.2 Precision Precision is defined as the agreement betwee n a set of replicate measurements without assumption or regard about the true value. Precision limits for the laboratory measurements will be evaluated from the sample/sample duplicate analyses results. Field sampling precision will be evaluated from the field duplicate sample analyses results. The relative percent difference (RPD) measured between two duplicate samples will serve as the quantitative measure of pr ecision. Precision for sampling is evaluated separately from precision for analytical data. Field co-located samples help clarify the distinction between uncertainty due to analytical variability and he terogeneity of the samp le matrix. Laboratory control samples (LCS) and duplicate LCS analyses results will be used to assess analytical precision.Work Plan/Sampling and Analysis Plan, Monitoring Well Installation 4-7 

### 4.4.3 Completeness Completeness is defined as the overall percenta ge of valid analytical results (including estimated results) compared to the total number of analytical results reported by the analytical laboratory. The completeness goal for this project is 90 percent. Successful completion of data acquisition can only be accomplished if both the fiel d and laboratory portions of the project are performed according to the procedures described in the QAPP. 

### 4.4.4 Representativeness Representativeness is the de gree that data accurately and precisely represents a characteristic of a population, parameter variati ons at a sampling point, or an environmental condition. Representativeness wi ll be achieved by conducting samp ling in compliance with the sample collection procedures described in Section 3. F ield duplicate samples will be collected and used as a means to assess field representativeness. 

### 4.4.5 Comparability Comparability expresses the confidence with which one data set can be compared to another data set. Comparability can be related to accuracy and precision because these quantities are measures of data reliability. Data are c onsidered comparable if collection techniques, measurement procedures, methods, and reporting are equivalent for the samples within a sample set. Comparability for sampling will be determined to be acceptable based on the following criteria: a consistent approach to sampling was applied throughout the program; samples were consistently preserved; and samples were collected under similar physical conditions. 

### 4.4.6 Sensitivity Sensitivity is defined as the ability of an analyt ical method or instrument to detect the target analytes at the level of interest. Sensitivity is assessed based on calibration criteria, and instrument method detection limits (MDLs) a nd LOQs, which are presented in Table 2 and Table 3. Sensitivity will be measured by including a calibration standard for the analytes at or close to the quantitation limit.


### 4.5 DATA REPORTIN G AND DOCUMENTATION The laboratory will prepare and retain full analytical and QC documentation. The following items present the key component s of the hard copy deliverable s that will be generated:Work Plan/Sampling and Analysis Plan, Monitoring Well Installation 4-8  Data packages along with supporting QC data,

 Original copy CoC forms or certified copies,

 Cover sheet listing the samples included in the report and narrative comments describing problems encountered during the analysis,

 Tabulated presentation of analytical results for all samples including reporting limits for all analyses and any laboratory assigned data qualifiers (data qualifiers will be defined and documented in the case narrative),

 Tabulated presentation of the results for all method and preparation blanks as applicable, and

 Analytical results for all laboratory QC samp le analyses (LCS results and recoveries, surrogate recoveries, recoveries, and RPDs, laboratory duplicate (LD) , and serial dilution results).


### 4.6 OVERSIGHT AND ASSESSMENT The QA/QC protocols and procedures will be implemented for all project activities. The plans and procedures implemented in the fiel d and laboratory will be evaluated by direct oversight of activities, surveilla nce, and review of the documentation and data. The oversight and assessment of project activities will be performe d by the BPM, PPM, or designated alternate. If problems or incidences of nonconformance are identified, the following section identifies personnel that will deal with them and corre ctive measures that will be implemented.



### 4.7 CORRECTIVE ACTION The BPM and PPM are responsible for maintaini ng quality throughout this project. The FM is responsible for ensuring the day- to-day quality of field activities. All incidences of nonconformance with the esta blished QC procedures will be expeditiously identified and controlled. No additional work that is depende nt on a nonconforming activity that potentially affects data quality will be perf ormed until the identified nonconformance is corrected. Documentation describing the nonconform ity will be submitted to the BPM and PPM. The documentation will include corrective measur es to prevent nonconformity from recurring. When errors, deficiencies, or out-of-contro l situations exist, the QA program provides systematic procedures, called “corrective actions,” to resolv e problems and restore properWork Plan/Sampling and Analysis Plan, Monitoring Well Installation 4-9 functioning to the analytical sy stem. Laboratory personnel are al erted that corrective actions may be necessary if:

 QC data are outside acceptable limits for precision and accuracy;

 Blanks or LCS contain contaminants above acceptable limits;

 There are unusual changes in detection limits;

 Deficiencies are detected during internal or external audits or from the results of performance evaluation samples; or

 Inquiries concerning data quality are received from clients. Corrective action procedures are often handled at the bench level by th e analyst, who reviews the preparation or extraction procedure for possi ble errors, checks the instrument calibration, spike and calibration mixes, and instrument sens itivity. If the problem persists or cannot be identified, the matter is referred to the laborator y technical personnel, Laboratory PM, and/or QA managers (BPM and PPM) for further investig ation. Once the problem is resolved, full documentation of the corrective ac tion procedure will be filed w ith the QA managers through an anomaly or non-conformance form. This form will be kept by both QA managers. Corrective action documentation is routinely reviewed by the QA managers. Corrective action is dictated by the type and extent of th e non-conformance. Corrective action may be initiated and carri ed out by non-supervisory staff, but final approval and data review by management is necessary before repo rting any information. All potentially affected data must be thoroughly reviewed for acceptance or rejection. Samples are monitored closely so that they can be analyzed within the recommen ded holding time. Howeve r, should a sample be analyzed outside of the specified holding time, a Holding Time Violation Notification is filled out and the Laboratory PM is info rmed immediately. It is the Laboratory PM’s responsibility to inform the BPM and PPM so that a d ecision can be made to re-sample. The Laboratory PM or QA offi cer share the responsibility of reviewing all laboratory analytical activities to ensure compliance with th e QC requirements outlined in this QAPP. This review serves as a control function in that it sh ould be conducted frequently so deviations from method requirements will be immedi ately identified and corrected. 

### 4.7.1 Field Corrective Action The FM will review the proced ures being implemented in the field for consistency with the established protocols. Sample collection procedur es will be checked for completeness. WhenWork Plan/Sampling and Analysis Plan, Monitoring Well Installation 4-10 procedures are not strictly in compliance with the established protocol, the deviation will be documented and reported to the BPM and PPM. Non-conformances will be expeditiously identified and controlled. No additional work that is depende nt on a nonconforming activity that potentially affects data quality will be perf ormed until the identified nonconformance is corrected. Corrective actions will be defined by the BPM and PPM a nd documented as appropriate. After implementation of the corrective action, the FM will provide the BPM and PPM with a written memorandum documenting field implemen tation. The memorandum will become part of the project files. 

### 4.7.2 Laboratory Corrective Action The Laboratory QA/QC officer or designated al ternate will be respons ible for initiating corrective action as necessary. Non-conformance or problems occurring at the laboratory will be reported to the BPM and PPM within one working day of identification. Appropriate corrective action will be required if analys es of QC samples or laboratory conditions do not meet criteria specified in the respectiv e methods, the laboratory QAPP, or this work plan. The chemist or designated alternat e will review the field and labor atory data generated for this project to determine if the project QA objectives are met. If any non-conformance is found in the laboratory analytical results or documen tation procedures during data assessment and validation, the impact of those non-conformances on the overall project QA objectives will be assessed. Appropriate actions, including resampli ng or reanalysis, may be recommended to the BPM and PPM, so that the objectives can be achieved.


### 4.7.3 Corrective Action Fo llowing Data Assessment The chemist or designated alternat e will review the field and labor atory data generated for this project to determine if project QA objectives are met. If non-conformances are found in the field procedures, sample collection pro cedures, field documentation proc edures, laboratory analytical and documentation procedures, or data review procedures, the im pact of those non-conformances on the overall project obj ectives will be evaluated. Appropr iate actions, including resampling or reanalysis, will be recommended to the BPM and PPM so that the project objectives can be achieved.Work Plan/Sampling and Analysis Plan, Monitoring Well Installation 5-1 

### SECTION 5 REPORTING A Remedial Investigation (RI) report that documents drilling, well installation, and groundwater sampling activities and presents resu lts of soil and groundwater sampling will be prepared. Supporting figures, tables, and calculati ons will be included. The RI report will be submitted in draft and final versions. A response to comments on the draft submittal indicating how each Government/regulatory comment was a ddressed will be prepared. The reporting schedule is provided in Appendix A. A tentative outline for the RI Report is as follows:
1. Introduction and Background Information 2. Remedial Investigation Activities 3. Remedial Investigation Results 4. Conclusions 5. References Appendices: Boring Logs and Well Completio n Diagrams, Field Data, Survey Data, Laboratory Analytical Reports, and An alytical Data Quality Assessment Reports.Work Plan/Sampling and Analysis Plan, Monitoring Well Installation 6-1 

### SECTION 6 REFERENCES
AMEC Earth and Environmental Inc. (AMEC), 2002. Red Hill Bulk Fuel Storage Facility Investigation Report . Prepared for NAVFAC Pacific, August. Department of Defense (DoD). 2010. Department of Defense Q uality Systems Manual for Environmental Laboratories, Version 4.2 . October. Environet. 2010. Work Plan, Long-Term Monitoring, Red Hill Bulk Fuel Storage Facility, Pearl Harbor, Oahu, Hawaii . September. Environmental Science In ternational (ESI). 2012. Work/Sampling and Anal ysis Plan, Long-Term Groundwater and Soil Vapor Monitoring, Red Hill Bu lk Fuel Storage Facility, Joint Base Pearl Harbor-Hickam . October. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). 1996. Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste, SW846, 3 rd ed. Final Update III, Washington, GPO . November. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). 2001. EPA Requirements for Quality Assurance Project Plans, EPA QA/R-5, EPA/240/B- 01/003, Quality Assurance Division . March. Hawaii Department of Health (DOH). 2000. Hawaii Department of Health, Technical Guidance Manual for Underground Storage Tank Closure and Release Response . March. DOH, 2012, Hawaii Department of Health, Evaluation of Environmental Hazards at Sites with Contaminated Soil and Groundwater. Updated January 2012. Ogden Environmental and Energy Services Co., Inc. (Ogden). 1996. Phase I Remedial Investigation Report, Red Hill Oily Waste Disposal Facility, Fleet Industrial Supply Center. January. TEC, Inc (TEC). 2007. Red Hill Bulk Fuel Storage Facil ity Final Technical Report, Pearl Harbor, Hawaii (and Appendices) . August. TEC. 2009. Quarterly Groundwater Monitoring Repor t, Red Hill Fuel Storage Facility . Prepared for Navy Region Hawaii, Pearl Harbor, Hawaii, September. TEC. 2009. Red Hill Bulk Fuel Storage Facility, Final Groundwater Protection Plan, Pearl Harbor, Hawaii. January 2008, revised in December 2009.Work Plan/Sampling and Analysis Plan, Monitoring Well Installation 6-2 TEC. Inc 2010. Final Summary Report, Red Hill Bulk Fuel Storage Facility, Pearl Harbor, Oahu, Hawaii, Latitude: 21 degrees 22’ 15” N, Longitude: 157 degrees, 53’33” W. August. United States Army Corps of Engineers (UASCE). 2008. Safety and Health Requirements Engineering Manual (EM) 385-1-1 , September.

## FIGURESSITE PLAN MAP !(

!( !(

!( !(

!(

!( !(

!( OWDFMW1 HDMW2253-03 2354-01 Halawa Shaft Pump Station

2254-01 U.S. Navy Pumping Station at Red Hill Red Hill Fuel Storage Facility H-3 Freeway

Halawa Industrial

Park Halawa Correctional

Facility

Red Hill Oily Waste Disposal Facility S o u t h H a l a w

a S t r e a m

RHMW04

RHMW03

RHMW02 RHMW01

Moanalua Village

M

o a n a l u a S t r e a m RHMW05 Adit No. 3 Lower Access Road Upper Access Road

5
6 7 9

8
4 3

2 1 19

16 17
18 20 15

14 10 13

12 11

0 375 750 Feet 

### LEGEND



# K

X:\GISCADD\projects\Red_Hill\Mapfiles\Mon_Well_Install\RH_siteplan.mxd 7/10/2014 PARSONS FIGURE 1 Existing Monitoring Well Pumping Station

Boundary of Red Hill Fuel Storage Facility !( !(

Red Hill UST ID Number Red Hill Tunnels

Halawa Correctional Facility Boundary Access Road 

# ^ _ O'ahu, Hawaii

Red Hill Fuel Storage Facility

Monitoring Well Installation Red Hill Fuel Storage Facility Joint Base Pearl Harbor - Hickam Hawaii

South Jordan, Utah 1PROPOSED MONITORING WELLS 

# !( 

# !( !(

!( !(

!( !(

!(

!( !(

!( OWDFMW1 HDMW2253-03 2354-01 Halawa Shaft Pump Station

2254-01 U.S. Navy Pumping Station at Red Hill Red Hill Fuel Storage Facility H-3 Freeway

Halawa Industrial

Park Halawa Correctional

Facility

Red Hill Oily Waste Disposal Facility S o u t h H a l a w

a S t r e a m

RHMW04

RHMW03

RHMW02 RHMW01

Moanalua Village

M

o a n a l u a

S t r e a m RHMW05 Adit No. 3 Lower Access Road Upper Access Road Location 2

Location 1

5
6 7 9

8
4 3

2 1 19

16 17
18 20 15

14 10 13

12 11

0 375 750 Feet 

### LEGEND



# K

X:\GISCADD\projects\Red_Hill\Mapfiles\Mon_Well_Install\RH_proposed.mxd 7/10/2014 PARSONS FIGURE 2 Existing Monitoring Well Pumping Station

Boundary of Red Hill Fuel Storage Facility !( !(

Red Hill UST ID Number
Red Hill Tunnels

Halawa Correctional Facility Boundary Access Road

Monitoring Well Installation Red Hill Fuel Storage Facility Joint Base Pearl Harbor - Hickam Hawaii

South Jordan, Utah

Proposed Monitoring Well 

# !(

1

## TABLESWork Plan/Sampling and Analysis Plan, Monitoring Well Installation Page 1 of 1 

### TABLE 1 KEY PERSONNEL Monitoring Well Installation Red Hill Fuel Storage Facility Joint Base Pearl Harbor-Hickam

Name Title Address Phone/Fax E-mail
Bruce Tsutsui NAVFAC Hawaii Remedial Project Manager 400 Marshall Road, Building X-11 JBPHH, HI 96860-3139 Ph: 808-471-1171 x353 bruce.tsutsui@navy.mil

Peter Nakamura NAVFAC Hawaii Alternate Remedial Project Manager 400 Marshall Road, Building X-11 JBPHH, HI 96860-3139 Ph: 808-471-1171 x260 peter.nakamura@navy.mil

Russell Sirabian Battelle Program Manager 50 Main Street, Suite 1000 White Plains, NY 10606 Ph: 914-682-2179 Cell: 914-557-2931 sirabianr@battelle.org Carolyn Scala Battelle Project Manager 301 S. State Street, Ste. N001 Newtown, PA 18940 Ph: 215-504-5003 Cell: 609-548-6082 scalac@battelle.org

Ed Heyse Parsons Program Manager 401 Diamond Drive, Northwest Huntsville, Alabama Ph: 256-217-2573 Cell: 303-563-9452 ed.heyse@parsons.com

Gene Wright Parsons Project Manager 10235 South Jordan Gateway, 3 rd Floor South Jordan, UT 84095 Ph: 801-553-3317 Cell: 801-592-4276 gene.wright@parsons.com

John Ratz Parsons Technical Resource 1776 Lincoln Avenue, Suite 600 Denver, CO 80290 Ph: 303- 764-8718 Cell: 808- 330-3432 john.ratz@parsons.com

Mitch Jensen Parsons Field Task Manager for Site Characterization 10235 South Jordan Gateway, 3 rd Floor South Jordan, UT 84095 Ph: 801- 553-3311 Cell: 801- 380-1375 mitch.jensen@parsons.com

William Stohler Parsons Alternate Field Task / Safety Manager for Characterization Honolulu Hi, Works from home Cell: 808- 258-7371 william.stohler@parsons.com

John Hall Parsons Alternate Field Task / Safety Manager for Characterization Grand Junction CO, Works from home Cell: 970- 244-8829 john.f.hall@parsons.com

Tammy Chang Parsons Project Chemist 8000 Centre Park Dr., Ste. 200 Austin, TX 78754 Ph: 512-719-6092 tammy.chang@parsons.comWork Plan/Sampling and Analysis Plan, Monitoring Well Installation Page 1 of 1 

### TABLE 2 SOIL ANALYTICAL METHODS, PROJECT ACTI ON LEVELS, AND LABORATORY SPECIFIC LIMITS Monitoring Well Installation Red Hill Fuel Storage Facility Joint Base Pearl Harbor-Hickam

Analytes DOH EAL (mg/kg) PAL (mg/kg) PQL Goal (mg/kg) Laboratory Specific Limits Gross Contamination Leaching & Groundwater

Protection LOQ (mg/kg) LOD (mg/kg) MDL (mg/kg) Analytical Group: BTEX (EPA 8260C) Benzene 500 0.3 0.3 0.03 0.005 0.0020 0.0006 Toluene 500 3.2 3.2 0.32 0.005 0.0020 0.0006 Ethylbenzene 480 3.7 3.7 0.37 0.005 0.0020 0.0006 Xylenes 390 2.1 2.1 0.21 0.01 0.002 0.001 Analytical Group: PAHs (EPA 8270C SIM) Acenaphthene 1,000 120 120 12 0.005 0.0017 0.0010 Acenaphthylene 500 100 100 10 0.005 0.0017 0.0009 Anthracene 500 59 59 5.9 0.005 0.0017 0.0008 Benzo[a]anthracene 500 10 10 1 0.005 0.0017 0.0009 Benzo[g,h,i]perylene 500 35 35 3.5 0.005 0.0017 0.0013 Benzo[a]pyrene 500 20 20 2 0.005 0.0017 0.0009 Benzo[b]fluoranthene 500 9.2 9.2 0.92 0.005 0.0017 0.0011 Benzo[k]fluoranthene 500 39 39 3.9 0.005 0.0017 0.0010 Chrysene 1,000 30 30 3 0.005 0.0017 0.0008 Dibenzo[a,h]anthracene 500 12 12 1.2 0.005 0.0017 0.0009 Fluoranthene 500 1,200 500 50 0.005 0.0017 0.0012 Fluorene 500 370 370 37 0.005 0.0017 0.0010 Ideno[1,2,3-cd]pyrene 500 30 30 3 0.005 0.0017 0.0009 1,-methylnaphthalene 500 1.8 1.8 0.18 0.005 0.0017 0.0010 2,-methylnaphthalene 500 4.1 4.1 0.41 0.005 0.0017 0.0009 Naphthalene 500 4.4 4.4 0.44 0.005 0.0017 0.0009 Phenanthrene 500 570 500 50 0.005 0.0017 0.0011 Pyrene 500 610 500 50 0.005 0.0017 0.0012

Analytical Group: TPH (EPA 8015) TPH as Gasoline Range Organics 100 100 100 10 2.0 0.80 0.34 TPH as Diesel Range Organics 500 100 100 10 5.0 1.00 0.65 Analytical Group: Metals (EPA 6020A) Lead 1,000 73 (1) 73 7.3 0.1 0.05 0.02
Notes: (1) The background concentration for le ad in soil will be used for pr eliminary data screening purposes. DOH EAL – State of Hawaii Department of Health Hazard Evaluation and Emergency Res ponse Office Environm ental Action Levels for sites where groundwater is a current drinking water source an d surface water is greater than 150 meters from the site – Jan uary 2012. LOD – Limit of Detec tion LOQ – Limit of Quantification MDL – Method Detection Limit PAL – Project Action Level PQL – Project Quantification LimitWork Plan/Sampling and Analysis Plan, Monitoring Well Installation Page 1 of 2 TABLE 3 GROUNDWATER ANALYTICAL METHODS, PROJEC T ACTION LEVELS, AND LABORATORY SPECIFIC LIMITS Monitoring Well Installation Red Hill Fuel Storage Facility Joint Base Pearl Harbor-Hickam

Analytes DOH EAL (ug/L) PAL (ug/L) PQL Goal (ug/L) Laboratory Specific Limits Drinking

Water Toxicity Gross Contamination LOQ (ug/L) LOD (ug/L) MDL (ug/L) Analytical Group: BTEX (EPA 8260C) Benzene 5 170 5 0.5 1.0 0.30 0.16 Toluene 1,000 40 40 4 1.0 0.30 0.17 Ethylbenzene 700 30 30 3 1.0 0.50 0.23 Xylenes 10,000 20 20 2 2.0 0.30 0.19 Analytical Group: PAHs (EPA 8270C SIM) Acenaphthene 370 20 20 2 0.2 0.10 0.06 Acenaphthylene 240 2,000 240 24 0.2 0.10 0.06 Anthracene 1,800 22 22 2.2 0.2 0.10 0.05 Benzo[a]anthracene 0.092 4. 7 0.092 0.0092 0.2* 0.10 0.07 Benzo[g,h,i]perylene 1,500 0.13 0.13 0.013 0.2* 0.10 0.08 Benzo[a]pyrene 0.2 0.81 0.2 0.02 0.2 0.10 0.06 Benzo[b]fluoranthene 0.092 0.75 0.092 0.0092 0.2* 0.10 0.06 Benzo[k]fluoranthene 0.92 0.4 0.4 0.04 0.2 0.10 0.07 Chrysene 9.2 1 1 0.1 0.2 0.10 0.05 Dibenzo[a,h]anthracene 0.0092 0.52 0.0092 0.00092 0.2* 0.10 0.05 Fluoranthene 1,500 130 130 13 0.2 0.10 0.08 Fluorene 240 950 240 24 0.2 0.10 0.06 Ideno[1,2,3-cd]pyrene 0.092 0.095 0.092 0.0092 0.2* 0.10 0.07 1,-methylnaphthalene 4.7 10 4.7 0.47 0.2 0.10 0.06 2,-methylnaphthalene 24 10 10 1 0.2 0.10 0.06 Naphthalene 17 21 17 1.7 0.2 0.10 0.05 Phenanthrene 240 410 240 24 0.2 0.10 0.07 Pyrene 180 68 68 6.8 0.2 0.10 0.08 Analytical Group: TPH (EPA 8015) TPH as Gasoline Range Organics 100 100 100 10 20 18.0 8.6 TPH as Diesel Range Organics 190 100 100 10 150 50.0 40.4 Analytical Group: Metals (EPA 6020) Dissolved Lead 15 50,000 15 1.5 3 0.4 0.19Work Plan/Sampling and Analysis Plan, Monitoring Well Installation Page 2 of 2 TABLE 3 (Continued) GROUNDWATER ANALYTICAL METHODS, PROJEC T ACTION LEVELS, AND LABORATORY SPECIFIC LIMITS Monitoring Well Installation Red Hill Fuel Storage Facility Joint Base Pearl Harbor-Hickam

Analytes DOH EAL (ug/L) PAL (ug/L) PQL Goal (ug/L) Laboratory Specific Limits Drinking

Water Toxicity Gross Contamination LOQ (ug/L) LOD (ug/L) MDL (ug/L) General Chemistry Methane (RSK-175) NA NA NA NA 1.0 0.45 0.25 Sulfate (9056A) NA NA NA NA 1.0 mg/L 0.198 mg/L 0.090 mg/L Nitrate/Nitrite (353.2) NA NA NA NA 0.1 mg/L 0.1 mg/L 0.028 mg/L Alkalinity (SM2320B) NA NA NA NA 2.0 mg/L 1.7 mg/L 0.85 mg/L
Notes:

DOH EAL – State of Hawaii Department of Health Hazard Eval uation and Emergency Response Office Environmental Action Levels for sites where groundwater is a curr ent drinking water source and surface water is greater than 150 meters from the sit e. LOD – Limit of Detection LOQ – Limit of Quantification MDL – Method Detection Limit PAL – Project Action Level PQL – Project Quantification Limit NA – Not applicable * - In the case where an EAL for a specific chemical is less than the LOQ for a commercial laboratory, it is generally acceptab le to consider the LOQ in plac e of the actions level.Work Plan/Sampling and Analysis Plan, Monitoring Well Installation Page 1 of 1 

### TABLE 4 ANALYTICAL METHODS, SAMPLE CO NTAINERS, PRESERVATION, AND HOLDING TIMES FOR GROUNDWATER SAMPLING Monitoring Well Installation Red Hill Fuel Storage Facility Joint Base Pearl Harbor-Hickam, Hawaii

Analyte Number/ Type of Containers per Sample Preservative Holding Time
Extraction Analysis

TPH-DRO 1-Liter amber glass 4° Celsius 7 days 40 days

TPH-GRO Three 40 milliliter glass vials with Teflon-lined septum 4° Celsius - 7 days

VOCs Three 40 milliliter glass vials with Teflon-lined septum 4° Celsius - 7 days

Methane Three 40 milliliter glass vials with Teflon-lined septum 4° Celsius - 28 days

PAHs Two 1-liter amber glass bottle 4° Celsius 7 days 40 days Alkalinity/

Sulfate One 250 milliliter polyethylene bottle 4° Celsius

- 14 days/ 28 days

Nitrate/Nitrite One 125 milliliter polyethylene bottle sulfuric acid

- 28 days

Dissolved Lead One 500 milliliter polyethylene bottle HNO 3 to pH < 2, 4 o Celsius

-- 180 days

TPH-DRO Total Petroleum Hydrocarbon-Diesel Range Organics TPH-RRO Total Petroleum Hydrocarbon-Residual Range Organics TPH-GRO Total Petroleum Hydrocarbon-Gasoline Range Organics PAH Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons VOC Volatile Organic Hydrocarbons HNO 3 Nitric Acid Note: Dissolved lead will be field filtered.