alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Order entered October 26, 2017

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05

- 17

- 00238

- CR

JOSE EDUARDO GUERRER O, Appellant

V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the Cr iminal District Court No. 6

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. F15

- 75211

- X



### O RDER
By order dated September 26, 2017, we granted Kelly Simmons’s request and ordered the reporter’s record filed by October 17, 2017. We caution ed Ms. Simmons that if the reporter’s
record was not filed by that date, the Court w ould , on its own motion, order that she not sit until the complete reporter’s record is filed. To date, no reporter’s record has been filed.
We ORDER that Kelly Simmons NOT SIT as a court report er until she has filed the complete reporter’s record in this appeal.

We DIRECT the Clerk to send copies of this order to the Honorable Jeanine Howard, Presiding Judge, Criminal District Court No. 6 ; to Jan Williams, official court reporter , Criminal
Distr ict Court No. 6 ; to Kelly Simmons, court reporter; to the Dallas County Auditor’s Office; and to all counsel for all parties.

/s/ LANA MYERS JUSTICE
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended
June 30, 2016 (the Report) of Solar Senior Capital Ltd. (the Registrant), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, RICHARD L. PETEKA, the Chief Financial Officer of the Registrant, hereby
certify, to the best of my knowledge, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.



|      |  |                         
|----- |  | ------------------------
|      |  | /S/    RICHARD L.
PETEKA
|Name: |  | Richard L. Peteka       
|Date: |  | August 2, 2016
exhibit10_204q13.htm



EXHIBIT 10.20


 


AMENDMENT NUMBER TWO


TO THE


HENRY SCHEIN, INC.


DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN


EFFECTIVE AS OF JANUARY 1, 2011












WHEREAS, Henry Schein, Inc. (the “Company”) maintains the Henry Schein, Inc. Deferred Compensation Plan, effective as of January 1, 2011, as amended (the “Plan”);


 


WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 8.2 of the Plan, the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of Henry Schein, Inc. (the “Committee”) is authorized to amend the Plan; and


 


WHEREAS, the Committee wishes to amend the Plan to allow the Committee as well as the Board to approve Associated Companies as participating employers under the Plan.


 


NOW, THEREFORE, the Plan is hereby amended effective as of January 1, 2011 as follows:


 



	
1.

	
Section 2.19 of the Plan is hereby amended in its entirety to read as follows:


 


	  	
“‘Employer’ means the Company and any Associated Company which is approved as a participating employer hereunder by the Board or the Committee.”












IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this amendment has been executed this 10th day of May, 2013.


 


 


HENRY SCHEIN, INC.



 



	  	
By: /s/ Michael S. Ettinger


	  	
Title:   Senior Vice President and General Counsel
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AS OF 3-29-98, AND THE CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT
OF INCOME FOR THE FIFTY-TWO WEEKS ENDED 3-29-98, OF AMERILINK CORPORATION AND 
IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-29-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             MAR-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-29-1998
<CASH>                                           8,723
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   14,119
<ALLOWANCES>                                       234
<INVENTORY>                                      1,656
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                30,757
<PP&E>                                           7,585<F1>
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0<F1>
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  38,528
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            7,208
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        24,017
<OTHER-SE>                                       7,303
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    38,528
<SALES>                                         85,646
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                85,646
<CGS>                                           52,616
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   77,799
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   230
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 188
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  7,659
<INCOME-TAX>                                     3,073
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              4,586
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     4,586
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.20
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.15
<FN>
<F1>PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT IS REPORTED NET OF ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION 
ON THE CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
#### Marcus KEEL, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 67-251.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Second District.

Jan. 19, 1968.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
II 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 705 

To amend title 36, United States Code, to ensure that memorials commemorating the service of the United States Armed Forces may contain 

religious symbols, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

APRIL 11, 2013 

Mr. BURR (for himself, Mr. JOHANNS, Mr. RUBIO, Mr. ISAKSON, and Mr. 

BOOZMAN) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL 

To amend title 36, United States Code, to ensure that memorials commemorating the service of the United States 

Armed Forces may contain religious symbols, and for 

other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘War Memorial Protec5 tion Act of 2013’’. 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 705 IS

1 SEC. 2. INCLUSION OF RELIGIOUS SYMBOLS AS PART OF 

2 MILITARY MEMORIALS. 

3 (a) AUTHORITY.—Chapter 21 of title 36, United 

4 States Code, is amended by adding at the end the fol5 lowing: 

6 ‘‘§ 2115. Inclusion of religious symbols as part of mili7 tary memorials 

8 ‘‘(a) INCLUSION OF RELIGIOUS SYMBOLS AUTHOR9 IZED.—To recognize the religious background of members 

10 of the United States Armed Forces, religious symbols may 

11 be included as part of— 

12 ‘‘(1) a military memorial that is established or 

13 acquired by the United States Government; or 

14 ‘‘(2) a military memorial that is not established 

15 by the United States Government, but for which the 

16 American Battle Monuments Commission cooperated 

17 in the establishment of the memorial. 

18 ‘‘(b) MILITARY MEMORIAL DEFINED.—In this sec19 tion, the term ‘military memorial’ means a memorial or 

20 monument commemorating the service of the United 

21 States Armed Forces. The term includes works of archi22 tecture and art described in section 2105(b) of this title.’’. 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 705 IS

1 (b) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections 

2 at the beginning of such chapter is amended by adding 

3 at the end the following: 

‘‘2115. Inclusion of religious symbols as part of military memorials.’’. 

Æ 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
EXHIBIT 32.2 
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
 18 U.S.C. 1350
 (SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002)
 
 I, James A. Graf, Chief Financial Officer of Global Eagle Acquisition Corp. (the “Company”), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that, to the best of my knowledge:
 
 (1) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2011 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and
 
 (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
  Date: August 15, 2011
/s/ James A. GrafName: James A. GrafTitle: Chief Financial Officer

(principal financial officer)
 A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Toggle Navigation
        Toggle Search
        
        Defense Information Systems Agency
        Please enter only alphanumeric characters
                
                Facebook
                    Twitter
                    Youtube
                    LinkedIn About Toggle Submenu
			  Our Work / DISA 101
				  Our Leaders
				  Our Strategic Plan
				  Our History
				  DISA Policy/Issuances
				  Fact Sheets
				  Industry Partners
				  Contact Us
			News and Events Toggle Submenu
			  News
				  Events
				  Training
				  Media Resources
			Services and Capabilities News & Events
        
        
          
            2023
 Print
                    Share
 News
        
                Events
            
                Training
            
                Media Resources
 “This development allows our team to be better positioned to meet the needs of our [customers] and secures our position as an organization at the ‘tip of the spear’ in defending the DODIN,” said Darrell Fountain, DISA CSSP Services chief.
 DISA is one of the few DOD service providers that can offer this level of protection to Microsoft Azure cloud environments. Learn more aboutDISA CSSP services.
 Learn More Follow us on Twitter, LinkedIn, and Facebook to learn more about how DISA is strengthening the nation and warfighter communications. Subscribe to receive the latest DISA news.  DISA: Trusted to Connect, Protect, and Serve Learn more
 Our Work
    Our Leaders
    Our Organization Structure
    Our History
    Small Business Programs
    Issuances/Policy
    **News & Events**
    News
    Events
    Training
    Media Resources
                        **Careers at DISA**
    Employment Opportunities
    Learning and Development
    New Employees
    New Military Employees
    Quality of Work Life
    Recruiting Events
    SDC Recruitment
    Search for Opportunities
    WHCA Recruitment
                        ****Legal & Regulatory****
    Accessibility Notice
    Data Rights/Intellectual Property
    FOIA
    Inspector General
    Inventories & Schedules
    Linking Policy
    No Fear Act
    Privacy Impact Assessments
    Privacy Office
    Security/Privacy
    Whistleblower
            **Defense Information Systems Agency**
                        
                        Contact Us
                    Subscribe to DISA email updates:
                        Email
<PAGE>


                                                                    Exhibit 21.1

                         SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT


 ON Technology U.K. Limited, a corporation organized under the laws of England
 Wilma 96 Vermogensverwaltungs, a German GmbH (a)
 ON Technology Geschaftsuhrungs GmbH, a German GmbH (a)
 ON Technology Europe GmbH, a German GmbH
 ON Technology Schweiz GmbH, a Swiss GmbH
 ON Technology France SRL, a corporation organized under the laws of France
 ON Technology Securities Corporation, a corporation organized under the laws of
 Massachusetts

        (a) - these subsidiaries, in turn, own 100% of ON Technology Europe GmbH

                                       72
U.S. flag
              An official website of the United States government Skip to main content   end of header Census.gov Newsroom Releases Miscellaneous
 Newsroom Archive
 Skip left menu navigation
 About the Newsroom
 				Facts for Features
 				**News Releases**
 				Press Kits
 				Tip Sheets
 Release Information CB12-R.38 **Contact:**  Public Information Office
301-763-3030
 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:  FRIDAY, OCT. 12, 2012 Census Bureau Names Ditas Katague to National Advisory Committee on Racial, Ethnic and Other Populations The U.S. Census Bureau announced today the establishment of the National Advisory Committee on Racial, Ethnic and Other Populations and has named Ditas Katague as a member of the committee. The National Advisory Committee will advise the Census Bureau on a wide range of variables that affect the cost, accuracy and implementation of the Census Bureau’s programs and surveys, including the once-a-decade census. The committee, which is comprised of 32 members from multiple disciplines, will advise the Census Bureau on topics such as housing, children, youth, poverty, privacy, race and ethnicity, as well as lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender and other populations. “We expect that the expertise of this committee will help us meet emerging challenges the Census Bureau faces in producing statistics about our diverse nation,” said Thomas Mesenbourg, the Census Bureau’s acting director. “By helping us better understand a variety of issues that affect statistical measurement, this committee will help ensure that the Census Bureau continues to provide relevant and timely statistics used by federal, state and local governments as well as business and industry in an increasingly technologically oriented society.” The National Advisory Committee members, who serve at the discretion of the Census Bureau director, are chosen to serve based on expertise and knowledge of the cultural patterns, issues and/or statistical needs of hard-to-count populations. **Ditas Katague** has more than 20 years of experience at federal, state and local government agencies. Currently, she is chief of staff to California Public Utilities Commissioner Catherine Sandoval. While in the Governor’s Office of Planning and Research, she served as California’s 2010 Census director as well as the 2000 Census chief deputy director — overseeing and directing the statewide outreach and coordination. She received her bachelor’s degree in social science and practice of art from University of California, Berkeley and her master’s of public administration in organization development and intergovernmental management from the University of Southern California's Sol Price School of Public Policy.
  CONNECT WITH US

Information Quality
                    Data Linkage Infrastructure
                    Data Protection and Privacy Policy
                    Accessibility      
                    FOIA
                    Inspector General
                    No FEAR Act
                    U.S. Department of Commerce
                    USA.gov
                   Measuring America's People, Places, and Economy
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Form 10K and
is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              SEP-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 OCT-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                             548,576
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      267,771
<ALLOWANCES>                                             0
<INVENTORY>                                              0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 1,851,952
<PP&E>                                             780,745
<DEPRECIATION>                                     647,875
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  17,677,343
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            7,658,057
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                               295
<OTHER-SE>                                       9,958,220
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    17,677,343
<SALES>                                                  0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 3,991,539
<CGS>                                              852,506
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    6,499,711
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 2,375,753
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,503,864
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (5,736,431)
<INCOME-TAX>                                        29,977
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (5,736,431)
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (5,825,980)
<EPS-BASIC>                                        (0.20)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        (0.20)



</TABLE>
Exhibit 10.40


 


 


 


Non-Employee
Director Compensation 


 


The Chairman of the
Board of Directors receives an annual retainer of $120,000 for his services as
Chairman and his attendance at meetings of the Board of Directors and
committees of the Board. Each other non-employee director (the “non-employee
directors”) receives an annual retainer of $60,000 for his or her services as a
director.  In addition, the Chairman of the Board of Directors receives an
annual grant of restricted stock with a value equal to $160,000, and each other
non-employee director receives an annual grant of restricted stock with a value
equal to $125,000. Chairmen of the Audit, Compensation and Nominating and
Governance Committees receive an annual retainer of $35,000, $25,000 and $20,000,
respectively. Non-chair members of the Audit Committee receive an annual
retainer of $20,000, and non-chair members of the Compensation and Nominating
and Governance Committee receive an annual retainer of $10,000 and $7,500,
respectively. 


 


From time to time,
the Board of Directors of the Company may form ad hoc committees. Each
non-employee director who serves on an ad hoc committee receives $1,000 for
each meeting of the ad hoc committee that he or she attends, whether in person
or via telephone, except that the Chair of any ad hoc committee receives $2,000
for each such meeting that he or she attends. 


 


The Company maintains
a supplemental executive and director retirement savings plan pursuant to which
non-employee directors may defer up to 100 percent of their cash director fees
and make pre-tax contributions to an investment account established in their
name.  Participants in the supplemental executive and director retirement
savings plan are fully vested in their contributions to the plan, and direct
the investment of their accounts in investment alternatives that the Company
selects.  All contributions to the plan are subject to claims of our creditors.


 


The Company also
reimburses each non-employee director for his or her out-of-pocket expenses
incurred in attending Board of Directors’ meetings and committee meetings.
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 732 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 732

 To modify the criteria used by the Corps of Engineers to dredge small 
                                 ports.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             April 16, 2013

   Mr. Paul introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
       referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To modify the criteria used by the Corps of Engineers to dredge small 
                                 ports.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. MODIFICATION OF CORPS OF ENGINEERS CRITERIA TO DREDGE SMALL 
              PORTS.

    (a) Minimum Tonnage Requirement.--Notwithstanding any other 
provision of law (including regulations), effective beginning on the 
date of enactment of this Act, the tonnage requirement with respect to 
the consideration of dredging of small ports by the Corps of Engineers 
shall be a minimum of 500,000 tons, as calculated in accordance with 
subsection (b).
    (b) Calculation.--For purposes of subsection (a) and any other 
activity of the Corps of Engineers carried out on or after the date of 
enactment of this Act, tonnage shall be calculated by each relevant 
port authority and submitted to the Corps of Engineers.
                                 <all>
```