alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                  Exhibit 3.1(b)




                 CERTIFICATE OF MERGER OF RSJ ACQUISITION CO.
                      WITH AND INTO CITATION CORPORATION
                         AS EFFECTIVE DECEMBER 1, 1999

                                      90

<PAGE>

                                                                  EXHIBIT 3.1(b)

                             CERTIFICATE OF MERGER
                                      OF
                              RSJ ACQUISITION CO.
                                 WITH AND INTO
                             CITATION CORPORATION

                       (Under Section 251 of the General
                   Corporation Law of the State of Delaware)

     Citation Corporation, a Delaware corporation, hereby certifies that:

     1.   The name and state of incorporation of each of the constituent
corporations is as follows:

          (a) RSJ Acquisition Co., a Delaware corporation ("Merger Co."); and

          (b) Citation Corporation, a Delaware corporation (the "Company").

     2.   The Agreement and Plan of Merger and Recapitalization, dated as of
June 24, 1999, by and between Merger Co. and the Company, as amended by
Amendment No. 1 to the Agreement and Plan of Merger and Recapitalization, dated
as of September 3, 1999, by and between Merger Co. and the Company, and
Amendment No. 2 to the Agreement and Plan of Merger and Recapitalization, dated
as of October 12, 1999, by and between Merger Co. and the Company (the
"Agreement and Plan of Merger") has been approved, adopted, certified, executed
and acknowledged by each of the constituent corporations in accordance with
Section 251 (and, with respect to Merger Co., by the written consent of its sole
stockholder in accordance with Section 228) of the General Corporation Law of
the State of Delaware.

     3.   The name of the surviving corporation is Citation Corporation (the
"Surviving Corporation").

     4.   The Certificate of Incorporation of the Company as in effect
immediately prior to the merger shall be the Certificate of Incorporation of the
Surviving Corporation.

     5.   The executed Agreement and Plan of Merger is on file at the principal
place of business of the Surviving Corporation at 2 Office Park Circle, Suite
204, Birmingham, Alabama 35223.

     6.   A copy of the Agreement and Plan of Merger will be furnished by the
Surviving Corporation, on request and without cost, to any stockholder of any
constituent corporation.

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this certificate to be signed as
of the 30th day of November, 1999.

                           CITATION CORPORATION

                           By:     /s/ Frederick F. Sommer
                              ------------------------------------------------
                                   Name: Frederick F. Sommer
                                   Office: President and Chief Executive Officer

                                      91
EX-10.1



 Exhibit 10.1 

AMENDMENT TO CHANGE IN CONTROL AGREEMENT 

This Amendment to the Change in Control Agreement (this “Amendment”) is entered into to be effective as of January 1,
2014 and amends that certain Change in Control Agreement dated as of             ,             (the “CIC
Agreement”), by and among Humana Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), and             (the “Employee”). Capitalized terms used herein,
but not otherwise defined, shall have the meaning ascribed to such terms in the CIC Agreement. 
 NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the
premises and the mutual covenants and agreements contained herein and in the CIC Agreement, for good and valuable consideration, including eligibility for Employee to participate in the Company’s equity award program in 2014, the receipt and
sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties do hereby agree as follows: 
 1. Amendment to the CIC Agreement. Section 2(i)(b) of
the CIC Agreement is hereby amended by replacing the phrase, “maximum target amount,” with the phrase “target amount,” and the word “maximum” with the word “target.” 

2. Effect on CIC Agreement. Except as set forth in this Amendment, the CIC Agreement shall remain in full force and effect in accordance with its
original terms. 
 3. Governing Law. This Amendment shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the parties hereto and their respective
successors and assigns and shall be governed by, construed, interpreted, and applied in accordance with the laws of Delaware, excluding any choice of law rules which would refer the matter to the laws of another jurisdiction. 

4. Headings. Section headings in this Amendment are included herein for convenience of reference only and shall not constitute a part of this Amendment
for any other purpose. 
 5. Counterparts, Facsimile Signatures. This Amendment may be executed in two or more counterparts, each of which shall be
deemed an original, but all of which constitute but one agreement. 
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this Amendment to be
executed on its behalf by its duly authorized officer and the Employee has executed this Amendment, each as of the day and year set forth above. 
  

											
	HUMANA INC.	  		  	EMPLOYEE
					
	BY:	  	  
	  		  	BY:	  	  

	Name:	  	Bruce D. Broussard	  		  	Name:	  	
	Title:	  	President and Chief Executive Officer	  		  		  	
				
	ATTEST:	  		  		  	
					
	BY:	  	  
	  		  		  	
		  	    Name:	  	Joan O. Lenahan	  		  		  	
		  	    Title:	  	Vice President and Corporate Secretary
<PAGE>

                                                                 EXHIBIT 23.1


                        CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements 
and in the related prospectuses (Form S-3 No. 33-96756, Form S-3 No. 
33-95952, Form S-3 No. 333-17805, Form S-3 No. 19879, Form S-3 No. 
333-19879-01 and Form S-8 No. 33-90668) of Evans Withycombe Residential, Inc. 
of our report dated January 31, 1997, with respect to the consolidated 
financial statements and schedule of Evans Withycombe Residential, Inc. 
included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K/A) for the year ended December 31, 
1996.


                                            ERNST & YOUNG LLP


Phoenix, Arizona
March 10, 1997
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Kenneth H. Marks, Appellant.

(Appeal No. 1.)

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Defendant did not preserve for review his contention that his convictions under indictment No. 89-1415 must be reversed *(see,*CPL 470.05 [2]; *People v Lopez,*71 NY2d 662, 665-666; *People v Bouges,*129 AD2d 967). Moreover, defendant waived his right to appeal this issue as part of his plea bargain *(see, People v Seaberg,*74 NY2d 1, 7, 10). In any event, the record establishes that defendant did in fact knowingly and voluntarily plead guilty to each count of the indictment. (Appeal from Judgment of Erie County Court, D’Amico, J.—Grand Larceny, 4th Degree.) Present—Doerr, J. P., Boomer, Green, Pine and Davis, JJ.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                              5
<MULTIPLIER>                           1,000

<S>                                    <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                          12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                      DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                         JAN-1-1999
<PERIOD-END>                           DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                 30,752
<SECURITIES>                            4,011
<RECEIVABLES>                             207
<ALLOWANCES>                                0
<INVENTORY>                                 0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                       35,204
<PP&E>                                  1,384
<DEPRECIATION>                            429
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                         36,309
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                   3,951
<BONDS>                                     0
<COMMON>                                  174
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                       0
<PREFERRED>                                 0
<OTHER-SE>                             32,358
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>           36,309
<SALES>                                     0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            0
<CGS>                                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                          19,794
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                            0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                       (17,743)
<INCOME-TAX>                                0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                   (17,743)
<DISCONTINUED>                              0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                             0
<CHANGES>                                   0
<NET-INCOME>                          (17,743)
<EPS-BASIC>                           (1.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                           (1.02)
#### Robert Hiram EDWARDS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 970.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Fourth District.

Jan. 18, 1968.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
#### Frances Solomon, Respondent, v Leonard Solomon et al., Respondents. Sidney H. Gittelson, Nonparty Appellant.

Order unanimously reversed on the law without costs and motion granted. Memorandum: Plaintiffs attorney’s motion to be relieved as plaintiffs attorney (CPLR 321 [b] [2]) should have been granted. In support of his motion, plaintiffs attorney asserted that plaintiff refused to pay disbursements in violation of their retainer agreement, and that he had warned her that he would so move if she did not pay them. He also asserted that plaintiff had failed to comply with his *1082requests that she complete certain necessary forms, including her net worth statement. Plaintiff failed to submit opposing papers. Plaintiff’s attorney thus demonstrated sufficient cause to be permitted to withdraw *(see, Dordal v Laces Roller Corp.,*143 AD2d 727; *Holmes v Y.J.A. Realty Corp.,*128 AD2d 482) and a 30-day stay should have been ordered to enable plaintiff to obtain new counsel (CPLR 321 [c]). Plaintiff’s attorney also is entitled to a determination of the reasonable value of his legal services *(see,*Judiciary Law § 475; *Rosen v Rosen,*97 AD2d 837; *Goldman v Rafel Estates,*269 App Div 647). (Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Nassau County, Mellon, J.H.O.—Withdrawal of Counsel.) Present—Doerr, J. P., Boomer, Pine, Lawton and Lowery, JJ.
Exhibit 32.1 Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350) In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for period ended March 31, 2015 (the Report) of GSV Capital Corp. (the Registrant), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Michael T. Moe, the Chief Executive Officer of the Registrant, hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge, that: (1)

          The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and (2)

          The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant. /s/ Michael T. MoeName: Michael T. MoeDate:  May 11, 2015
(function ($) {

  $(document).ready(function(){

    // quick hack to apply slick slider outside Drupal config
    $('.field--name-field-hero').slick({
      autoplay: true,
      arrows: false,
      dots: true,
      autoplaySpeed: 4500,
      adaptiveHeight: true,
      focusOnChange: false,
      pauseOnDotsHover: false,
      accessibility: true,
      slidesToScroll: 1,
      slidesToShow: 1,
      infinite: true
    });

    // Add role = img to sortable tables column sorts (i.e., tables on /publication pages)
    $('.usa-table .usa-table__header__button .usa-icon').attr('role', 'img');

    // Add aria-labelledby and title to arrow icons on sortable tables ie publications page files
    $('.usa-table th:first .usa-table__header__button.usa-table__header__button .usa-icon').append("<desc id='sortDesc1'>Attachment column arrow image representing sort order (up is ascending, down is descending, and up/down is unsorted.</desc>");
    $('.usa-table th:first .usa-table__header__button .usa-icon').attr('aria-labelledby', 'sortDesc1');

    $('.usa-table th:nth-child(2) .usa-table__header__button.usa-table__header__button .usa-icon').append("<desc id='sortDesc2'>Ext. column arrow image representing sort order (up is ascending, down is descending, and up/down is unsorted.</desc>");
    $('.usa-table th:nth-child(2) .usa-table__header__button .usa-icon').attr('aria-labelledby', 'sortDesc2');

    $('.usa-table th:nth-child(3) .usa-table__header__button.usa-table__header__button .usa-icon').append("<desc id='sortDesc3'>Size column arrow image representing sort order (up is ascending, down is descending, and up/down is unsorted.</desc>");
    $('.usa-table th:nth-child(3) .usa-table__header__button .usa-icon').attr('aria-labelledby', 'sortDesc3');

    $('.usa-table th:nth-child(4) .usa-table__header__button.usa-table__header__button .usa-icon').append("<desc id='sortDesc4'>Date column arrow image representing sort order (up is ascending, down is descending, and up/down is unsorted.</desc>");
    $('.usa-table th:nth-child(4) .usa-table__header__button .usa-icon').attr('aria-labelledby', 'sortDesc4');

    // Add role = presentation to google search box for 508 purposes
    $('.header-inner .gsc-search-box').attr("role", "presentation");
    $('.header-inner .gsc-input').attr("role", "presentation");

    // 508 Fix for mobile menu when tabbing out of last primary parent item
    // Formerly, focus would got to main without closing mobile menu DHSGOV-3249
    $("ul.usa-nav__primary.usa-accordion li:last-child button").focusout(function() {
      if($("ul.usa-nav__primary.usa-accordion li:last-child .usa-nav__submenu").is(":hidden")){
          //alert("The submenu  is hidden. Go to X.");
          $('.usa-nav__close').focus();
      }
    });

  });

}(jQuery));
September 20, 2016

Exemption No. 14248A

Regulatory Docket No. FAA–2015–4863

Mr. Thomas Jennings

CEO

CloudD8ta LLC

505 Fairway Drive

PO Box 1185

Tahoe City, CA 96145

Dear Mr. Jennings:

This letter is to inform you that we have granted your petition for an amendment. It explains 

the basis for our decision, describes its effect, and lists any changes to the original conditions 

and limitations.

By letter dated April 21, 2016, you petitioned the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) on 

behalf of CloudD8ta LLC (hereinafter petitioner or operator) for an amendment to your 

current exemption. That exemption from §§ 61.23(a) and (c), 61.101(e)(4) and (5), 61.113(a), 

61.315(a), 91.7(a), 91.119(c), 91.121, 91.151(a)(1), 91.405(a), 91.407(a)(1), 91.409(a)(1) and 

(2), and 91.417(a) and (b) of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR) allows the 

petitioner to conduct UAS operations. You requested an amendment to change the company 

name from Thomas Jennings to CloudD8ta LLC.

1

In your petition, you indicate that there has been no change in the conditions and reasons 

relative to public interest and safety that were the basis for granting the original exemption.

The FAA has determined that good cause exists for not publishing a summary of the petition 

in the Federal Register because the requested amendment to the exemption would not set a 

precedent, and any delay in acting on this petition would be detrimental to the petitioner. 

 

1 The petitioner also requested to add aircraft and operations. At this time, the FAA is unable to act on these

requests. When the FAA is ready to act, we will proceed accordingly and no further action will be required by 

the petitioner.
2

Our Decision

The FAA has determined that the justification for the issuance of Exemption No. 14248

remains valid and is in the public interest. Therefore, under the authority contained 

in 49 U.S.C. 106(f), 40113, and 44701, delegated to me by the Administrator, the operator is 

granted an amendment to change the operator name.

The operator shall add this amendment to its original exemption.

 

Conditions and Limitations

In this grant of amendment, CloudD8ta LLC is hereafter referred to as the operator. All 

conditions and limitations within Grant of Exemption No. 14248 remain in effect. 

Failure to comply with any of the conditions and limitations of this grant of exemption will be 

grounds for the immediate suspension or rescission of this exemption. 

This exemption terminates on January 31, 2018, unless sooner superseded or rescinded.

Sincerely,

/s/

John S. Duncan

Director, Flight Standards Service
<PAGE>   1
 
                                                                      EXHIBIT 21
 
                    SUBSIDIARIES OF THE TIMES MIRROR COMPANY
 
                            AS OF DECEMBER 31, 1997*
 
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                STATE (OR
                                                               COUNTRY) OF
                            NAME                              INCORPORATION
                            ----                              -------------
<S>                                                           <C>
The Baltimore Sun Company...................................  Maryland
The Hartford Courant Company................................  Connecticut
Jeppesen & Co., GmbH**......................................  Germany
Jeppesen Sanderson, Inc.....................................  Delaware
Matthew Bender & Company, Incorporated**....................  New York
The Morning Call, Inc.......................................  Pennsylvania
Mosby, Inc..................................................  Missouri
Newsday, Inc.**.............................................  New York
Shepard's, Inc..............................................  Delaware
Times Mirror Magazines, Inc.**..............................  New York
Times Mirror Training, Inc..................................  Florida
</TABLE>
 
---------------
 * The names of certain other subsidiaries have been omitted because, considered
   in the aggregate as a single subsidiary, they would not constitute a
   significant subsidiary. The Los Angeles Times is a division of The Times
   Mirror Company.
 
** 100% owned by a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Registrant. (All other
   subsidiaries listed above are directly wholly-owned by the Registrant.)
 
                                       67
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 553 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 553

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide for an exclusion 
 for assistance provided to participants in certain veterinary student 
                loan repayment or forgiveness programs.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 13, 2013

Mr. Johnson of South Dakota (for himself, Mr. Crapo, Ms. Collins, Mrs. 
 Gillibrand, Ms. Hirono, Mr. Isakson, Ms. Klobuchar, Ms. Landrieu, Mr. 
Merkley, Mr. Moran, Mr. Roberts, Ms. Stabenow, Mr. Tester, Mr. Bennet, 
 Mr. Cochran, and Mr. Risch) introduced the following bill; which was 
          read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide for an exclusion 
 for assistance provided to participants in certain veterinary student 
                loan repayment or forgiveness programs.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Veterinary Medicine Loan Repayment 
Program Enhancement Act''.

SEC. 2. EXCLUSION FOR ASSISTANCE PROVIDED TO PARTICIPANTS IN CERTAIN 
              VETERINARY STUDENT LOAN REPAYMENT OR FORGIVENESS 
              PROGRAMS.

    (a) In General.--Paragraph (4) of section 108(f) of the Internal 
Revenue Code of 1986 is amended--
            (1) by striking ``or'' after ``such Act,'',
            (2) by striking the period at the end and inserting ``, 
        under section 1415A of the National Agricultural Research, 
        Extension, and Teaching Policy Act of 1977 (7 U.S.C. 3151a), or 
        under any other State loan repayment or loan forgiveness 
        program that is intended to provide for increased access to 
        veterinary services in such State.'', and
            (3) by striking ``state'' in the heading and inserting 
        ``other''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply to amounts received by an individual in taxable years beginning 
after December 31, 2012.
                                 <all>
```
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Carmen Figueroa, Appellant.

Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Arlene R. Silverman, J.), rendered June 27, 1989, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree and sentencing her, as a second felony offender, to a term of from four and one-half to nine years imprisonment, unanimously affirmed.

In this "buy and bust” case, defendant has failed to preserve for review her claim that the arresting officer’s testimony constituted *Trowbridge*error, pursuant to *People v Trowbridge*(305 NY 471). He had testified that defendant matched the description given to him by the undercover police officer who had made the heroin purchase, that defendant remained under arrest after a drive by and receipt of a radio transmission from the undercover officer and that, generally, suspects are released if not identified by the undercover during a confirmatory identification. Had these alleged errors been preserved for review, we would, in any event, find the bolstering claims meritless, since there is no contested issue of identification. *(People v Murray,*154 AD2d 292.) Defendant testified that she was the person who had spoken with the undercover police officer but alleged that she answered no in response, to his request for drugs, rather than participating in the transaction. Given these circumstances and defendant’s failure to present any issue of identification, the court’s re*388fusal to give the jury an identification charge was not error. *(People v Reedy,*126 AD2d 681.) Concur—Sullivan, J. P., Rosenberger, Wallach, Asch and Kassal, JJ.