alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EX-10.23.2



 Exhibit 10.23.2 

SECOND AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT 

This Second Amendment (“Amendment”) to the Employment Agreement (as defined below) is made and entered into as of
February 13, 2014 (the “Effective Date”), by and between RetailMeNot, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), and Steven Pho, an individual (the “Executive”).

 WHEREAS, the Company (then operating as WhaleShark Media, Inc.) and Executive previously entered into an Employment Agreement effective
as of March 1, 2013, as amended by that certain Amendment to Employment Agreement dated October 15, 2013 (the “Employment Agreement”); and 

WHEREAS, the Company and Executive wish to amend the Employment Agreement in the manner set forth herein, pursuant to Executive’s
request. 
 NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of their mutual promises and agreements contained in the Employment Agreement and other good and
valuable consideration, the Company and Executive agree as follows: 
  

	 	1.	Section 1.6.1 of the Employment Agreement shall be amended and restated to read in its entirety to read as follows: 


“1.6.1. Voluntary Termination, Termination for Cause, Termination for Death or Disability. In the case of a termination of
Executive’s employment hereunder for Death or Disability in accordance with Section 1.5.1 above, Executive’s Voluntary termination of employment hereunder in accordance with Section 1.5.2 above, or a termination of
Executive’s employment hereunder for Cause in accordance with Section 1.5.3 above, (i) Executive shall not be entitled to receive payment of, and the Company shall have no obligation to pay, any severance or similar
compensation attributable to such termination, other than Base Salary earned but unpaid, vested benefits under any employee benefit plan, and any unreimbursed expenses pursuant to Section 1.4.3 hereof incurred by Executive as of the
Termination Date, and (ii) the Company’s other obligations under this Agreement shall immediately cease.” 
  

	 	2.	Section 1.6.4 of the Employment Agreement shall be amended and restated in its entirety to read as follows: 


“1.6.4. Immediate Partial Vesting Upon Change of Control. Upon the occurrence of a Change in Control (as defined in
Section 1.6.2 above), twenty-five percent (25%) of any unvested shares subject to any equity grants issued to Executive by Company shall immediately accelerate and vest and become exercisable in full, subject to Executive’s continued
employment with the Company through the date of such event.” 
  

	 	3.	Except as specifically amended, the Employment Agreement shall remain in full force and effect as originally executed. 

  

	 	4.	This Amendment may be signed in counterparts, each of which shall be an original, with the same effect as if the signatures were upon the same instruments. 


  
 1 








 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Amendment is hereby executed to be effective as of the date set forth
above. 
  

			
	 “COMPANY”
  

RETAILMENOT, INC.

		
	By:	 	/s/ G. Cotter Cunningham
	Name:	 	G. Cotter Cunningham
	Title:	 	President and Chief Executive Officer
	
	 “EXECUTIVE”
  

STEVEN PHO

	
	/s/ Steven Pho
	By: Steven Pho



  
 2
### THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13

- 23

- 00582

- CV

IN THE MATTER OF THE MARRIAGE OF ROXANNA HERNANDEZ AND ALEX HERNANDEZ JR.

On Appeal from the 117th District Court of Nueces County , Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2020

- FAM

- 3088

- B

JUDGMENT THE THIRTEENTH C OURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on appeal, concludes the appeal should be dismissed . The Court orders the appeal DISMISSED in accordance with its opinion . Costs of the appeal are adjudged against appellant. We further order this decision cert ified below for observance. January 11, 2024
**Exhibit
      23.02**





**CONSENT
      OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**





We
      consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No.
      333-01560, 333-60295, 333-110959, and 333-130405 on Form S-8 of our report
      dated
      23 February 2006, 15 March 2006, as to the subsequent event discussed in Note
      1,
      relating to the financial statements of Slovenska Televizna Spolocnost, s.r.o.
      appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of Central European Media
      Enterprises Ltd. for the year ended December 31, 2005.











Deloitte
      Audit s.r.o.


Bratislava,
      Slovak Republic


March
      15,
      2006
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 _________________________________________

 Clerk

September 24, 2012

h0917

Order 

September 24, 2012

145173 & (55)

OLD REPUBLIC INSURANCE COMPANY,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v SC: 145173

COA: 302384

Wayne CC: 09-015360-CK

MICHIGAN CATASTROPHIC CLAIMS

ASSOCIATION,

Defendant-Appellee.

______________________________________/

On order of the Court, the motion for miscellaneous relief is GRANTED. The 

application for leave to appeal the April 17, 2012 judgment of the Court of Appeals is 

considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented 

should be reviewed by this Court.

HATHAWAY, J., not participating because she has a professional relationship with a 

member of a law firm involved in this matter.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CURRENCY> U.S.
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                           8,001
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    3,384
<ALLOWANCES>                                       954
<INVENTORY>                                         74
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                12,214
<PP&E>                                           1,836
<DEPRECIATION>                                   2,370
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  14,669
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            7,528
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           124
<OTHER-SE>                                       7,017
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    14,669
<SALES>                                         15,089
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                20,010
<CGS>                                            3,890
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   23,171
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               (6,538)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 325
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (188)
<INCOME-TAX>                                        27
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (215)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (215)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.02)
        

</TABLE>
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack

, Chief Justice

David F. Viviano,

Chief Justice Pro Tem

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

Octo ber 2 , 2020 

# Order

Clerk Octo ber 2 , 2020

162057(3)

ZACK B. BROWN,

Plaintiff,

SC: 162057

v AGC: 20

- 0965

ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION,

Defendant.

_______ __________________________________ /

On order of the Chief Justice, the motion of plaintiff to waive the filing fees in this

matter is GRANTED.
.

.

. **AUSTIN** 

### . . '?qz?E
. rionorableI.?rede&i : cwl?eston,

Texas . D&Z.-SirI

.18 '*nS I a?i'unnblleio rind any.lew.autborblz~ the pu&xm~ bf.~the.aut~bilen-roquosted In the rsoolutlon quoted abovs, X kindly ask that ,oou +-aahr ai0 lni9n 83 tapw$&ei-.'5 am, authorized to advert 30 ,fm:eettd.,o~@ .&I@, fsQn '. 3 a wMl?dlt fbyc the. pisa'ent cd 33m.. " .., .**- .** **. .**  **.- ...**  **.- ’**  **4:**

**. I**  **I ‘**  **. :**  **. .** 

. .



### . . T&letter &~Z~11'1,.194~,.mopt&nting the **-abbve** 

### raentioneU,~letter **r43do lo.**  

### pLpt: Tn 8iy lotter addresad: 

### tri$mo&!~ester2laJi for. aa~opiniou

with reXorcnua

to tba pubhase 

### or mtonobLts8 as **84t** 

### aat in the Sesolutlti.af ~!YJ. '~dlohers~ Court aud. quotml

**by** 

### *e f **bvs~r** 

### looked to advbe. 

### ';hat

he two atttnaobhes

are' in-- tentlet! awlnillbe **ased** 

### by ths Countyt2oz&aaloaQr(l'or Preolnwt

??oooi 1and-a%?oliiot1Fo;

4 ln-tu8 ooonty* reforrr. to **T&4** 

### Court

Order,

a8 

### pou.wlll

OSsarve, the C&I of the aUtofi?obiles tar. road 

### mpervlalon

but doesnot atatethat.tha County ~seioner irlll‘bo QI ~o~fsesd6a

of 8aseey

. &any oountiea opemte unaey%yaolui &?&a lam &oh
. **..prohdo** .~ert$.ly.~orora nore effloient x~nd **system** in suoh comtls3, and osgiia~y.proy~de~ror ‘the paymat bi ‘cioootit~

. . that &~5untp.ia not authofized to e&end Ate &&s for

‘QL~ ~puriSi~a tit autoEoblle@ to.. E8 

### umd **b7 ’**  **tho ’**  oC&nSs8~~ers In mumotion with thehcir duties Zn &.n~ $9’ aud

## ,rrca th6lr renerrpeotlv+3

**193t;riots ixi**  **couu%y** buslnosti or **La** ~oyvmtt‘ **or** repatr ana r+tcrat;o. ‘bllls on mob auto;robiIes; 4%~ enql~se .a oopy o$.this .opinioa **f?r** your. oqw~hi~~oo.~

. Wh also alreotl your attgntlon to .our ojAal&-%s; **O-752** an6 O-996 **regardtug** al&la2 qumMon8.~ ..a eaaloee **o?ples** of -them. .opiniom he&with..

fn ii& 0f the r&&w igiakia aid iie’ 

### author- : ities cited tbereln, M rc~~ectmX1~ sncnar-‘ *%m ebwe **stated** qmstlon **.df-t+e.** no~atlvo. **. ’** 

.

. . . :~

. . . ‘. . . . . .

. \ I 8._’ i -. , * - . . . . .

. .. . :.

.

. . - . mwialQ‘T. ifr&scni,.k4~ b. . : . 

## IQ**00LmeotfQll**

**al*** **the sor4golus** 

**n4 All**  **your. atten&**  **to opinloaa** 

**Koi. ’**  O-SllD **afid 04569**  **af this**  **p** l .p @ SOllt, COpi 

## Of

**Whibb ’**  **lU ’**  **5**

SXlOlO306. . . :

. __ -. .Elmwmxs .-, . -. .. . : . .: .; .:.. ..a:“? _ ., .- : : ‘.- .;.i’ - # -

. ,. :
. ., _ . .. ~ :. .. .,:; * . .* :’ .-. ‘: _..’ . :: ..: .;. :. . . . 1 .,
EXHIBIT 32: Rule 13a-14(b) Certifications





The undersigned officers certify that this report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and that the information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of China Sure Water (USA) Inc.





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to China Sure Water (USA) Inc. and will be retained by China Sure Water (USA) Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





May 23, 2011
/s/ Xinhong GuoXinhong Guo (Chief Executive Officer)May 23, 2011
/s/ Xiaojie GuoXiaojie Guo (Chief Financial Officer)
## In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

No. 02

- 22

- 00005

- CR

I RA H ENRY III

, Appellant

V

.

T HE S TATE OF T EXAS §

§

§

§

§ On A p p eal from the 297th District Court

of Tarrant County ( 0644657A )

March 24, 2022

Memorandum Opinion by Justice Walker

(nfp)

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that the

appeal should be dismissed. It is ord e r ed that the appeal is dismissed

.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

By /s/ Brian Walker

Justice Brian Walker
James Burke Jarreau (Cross 

Appellant)Appellee

Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

September 4, 2015

No. 04-15-00313-CR

The STATE of Texas,

Appellant

v.

James Burke JARREAU (Cross Appellant),

Appellee

From the 216th Judicial District Court, Gillespie County, Texas

Trial Court No. 5552

Honorable N. Keith Williams, Judge Presiding

ORDER

Cross-appellant filed a notice of appeal, and thereafter, a cross-appellant’s brief. In 

response, the State filed a motion to strike the cross-points raised in cross-appellant’s brief. We 

ORDER cross-appellant to file a written response to the State’s motion to strike, and further 

ORDER such response to be filed in this court on or before September 14, 2015.

_________________________________

Marialyn Barnard, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 4th day of September, 2015.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
EXHIBIT 21

SCHEDULE OF SUBSIDIARIES OF REGISTRANT



|                                    |  |              |   |  |                                         
|----------------------------------- |  | ------------ | - |  | ----------------------------------------
|                                    |  | PercentOwned |   |  | JurisdictionofIncorporation/Organization
|1. Security Bank of Bibb County (a) |  | 100          | % |  | Georgia                                 
|2. Security Bank of Houston County  |  | 100          | % |  | Georgia                                 
|3. Security Bank of Jones County    |  | 100          | % |  | Georgia                                 
|4. Security Bank of North Metro     |  | 100          | % |  | Georgia                                 
|5. Security Bank of North Fulton    |  | 100          | % |  | Georgia                                 
|6. Security Bank of Gwinnett County |  | 100          | % |  | Georgia                                 
|7. CFS Wealth Management            |  | 100          | % |  | Georgia                                 
|8. Statutory Trust I                |  | 100          | % |  | Georgia                                 
|9. Statutory Trust II               |  | 100          | % |  | Georgia                                 
|10. Rivoli Bancorp Capital Trust I  |  | 100          | % |  | Georgia                                 



|(a) | Fairfield Financial, Inc. is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Security Bank of Bibb County.
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
#### In the Matter of Ariel Nunez et al., Petitioners, v Benjamin Ward, as Police Commissioner of the City of New York, et al., Respondents.

Determination of respondent Police Commissioner dated February 2, 1989, which, *inter alia,*suspended petitioners for twenty (20) days and placed petitioners on disciplinary probation for one year, is unanimously confirmed, the petition denied, and this proceeding brought pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of Supreme Court, New York County [C. Beauchamp Ciparick, J.], entered on or about January 22, 1990), is dismissed, without costs.

There was substantial evidence to support the Commissioner’s determination that petitioners used unnecessary and excessive force while effectuating an arrest. An independent witness testified to seeing one officer holding the defendant and another striking him on the head with a club. That witness went to the home of a friend and called 911. The complainant also testified to being held and struck with a club. While police officers denied the use of a club, the decision by the Administrative Law Judge to credit the testimony of the independent witness cannot be said to be erroneous and is supported by the record. Concur—Milonas, J. P., Kupferman, Asch, Kassal and Smith, JJ.
**EXHIBIT 13.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIALOFFICER PURSUANT**

**TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, ASADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906**

**OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

Inconnection with the Annual Report of Embotelladora Andina S.A. (the “Company”)on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008, as filedwith the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),I, Osvaldo Garay, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002, that:

 

(1)      The Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)      The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

 

 
| /s/ OSVALDO GARAY          |   |
|----------------------------|--------|
| Osvaldo Garay              |   |
| Chief Financial Officer    |   |
| Embotelladora Andina  S.A. |   |
| Dated: June 30,  2009 |   |

 

A signed original of thiswritten statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Companyand will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities andExchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

----
**EXHIBIT 13.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT**

**TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS**

**ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Annual Report of Embotelladora Andina S.A. (the “Company”) on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015, as filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Andrés Wainer, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)                  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)                  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| /s/ ANDRÉS WAINER       |   |
|------------------------------|--------|
| Andrés Wainer           |   |
| Chief Financial Officer      |   |
| Embotelladora Andina   S.A.  |   |
| Dated: April 28,   2016 |   |

 

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

----
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court 

Lansing, Michigan 

October 31, 2005 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

128668 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

REYNALDO C. VARGAS,

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices 

v SC: 128668 

 COA: 259645 

WCAC: 03-000370 

KAYDON CORPORATION and TRAVELERS 

INSURANCE COMPANY, 

Defendants-Appellants. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the April 6, 2005 order 

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded 

that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

t1024 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

October 31, 2005 

Clerk
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Cesar A. Viven, Appellant.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Orange County (Byrne, J.), rendered September 8, 1989, convicting him of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the second degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant contends that the County Court erred in summarily denying his motion to withdraw his guilty plea on the ground that he and his codefendant had been represented by the same attorney at the plea and, as a consequence, he was denied his right to the effective assistance of counsel. We disagree. At arraignment, the County Court adequately ascertained, on the record, that the defendant was aware of the potential risks involved in joint representation and had knowingly chosen that course *(see, People v Cruz,*63 NY2d 848, 849; *People v Gomberg,*38 NY2d 307, 313-314). In any event, the defendant failed to demonstrate that a conflict of interest, or at least a significant possibility thereof, operated *(see, People v Recupero,*73 NY2d 877).

We have considered the defendant’s remaining contentions and find them to be without merit. Thompson, J. P., Brown, Kunzeman and Balletta, JJ., concur.
# National Preparedness Month, 2018

National Preparedness Month is a time to focus our attention on the importance of preparing our families, homes, businesses, and communities for disasters that threaten our lives, property, and homeland. During this time, we also honor the brave men and women who selflessly respond to crises and disasters, rendering aid to those in need. These first responders, who work tirelessly to safeguard our Nation and protect our citizens, deserve our utmost gratitude and appreciation.

Over the past year, communities nationwide and across the Territories have witnessed and endured damage from multiple hurricanes, wildfires, tornadoes, floods, volcanic eruptions, and other natural disasters. The historic hurricane season of 2017 included three catastrophic storms that made landfall within a month, and was followed by a destructive series of wildfires in California. Combined, these natural disasters affected 47 million people and tens of thousands were mobilized to provide aid, comfort, and assistance. We are also especially mindful of those currently affected by ongoing wildfires in California, Oregon, and Colorado. In spite of tremendous challenges, the resilience of the American people continues to prevail.

                    Tragedies are somber reminders that preparedness is a shared responsibility and that it is critical to maintain readiness. All Americans can prepare for potential disasters by developing and practicing a family emergency response plan, assembling a disaster supply kit, signing up for alerts on mobile devices, setting aside emergency savings, and maintaining adequate insurance policies for their homes and businesses. The Federal Emergency Management Agency's                     *Ready Campaign*                     outlines other important steps to best prepare for a major disaster.                

This month, I encourage all Americans to take the opportunity to ensure they have an emergency response plan in place and ready to be properly executed. Emergencies and disasters test the resilience and strength of families, communities, and our Nation. It is impossible to avoid every challenge and threat, but we can and must prepare for them. By doing so, we can help protect our communities and save lives.

NOW, THEREFORE, I, DONALD J. TRUMP, President of the United States of America, by virtue of the authority vested in me by the Constitution and the laws of the United States, do hereby proclaim September 2018 as National Preparedness Month. I encourage all Americans, including Federal, State, and local officials, to take action to be prepared for disaster or emergency by making and practicing their emergency response plans. Each step we take to become better prepared makes a real difference in how our families and communities will respond and persevere when faced with the unexpected.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this thirty-first day of August, in the year of our Lord two thousand eighteen, and of the Independence of the United States of America the two hundred and forty-third.

[FR Doc. 2018-19509

Billing code 3295-F8-P