# Proposed SIP Requirements Rule for 

# the 2008 Ozone NAAQS Southern Transportation & Air Quality Summit September 23, 2013

# Overview

• Rulemaking timeline

• SIP Requirements Rule

– SIP requirements for areas that are nonattainment for 2008 ozone NAAQS

– Anti
- backsliding requirements for 1
- hour and 1997 ozone NAAQS nonattainment areas



# • Discussion/Questions

2

# Timeline

• Proposal signed by Administrator: May 29, 2013

– Posted to the EPA web page same day



## • Published in the Federal Register June 6, 2013

– (78 FR 34178)



## • Public comment period began June 6, 2013

– Public hearing in Washington, DC on June 25, 2013

– Comment period ended September 4, 2013

– 54 comments received



## • Anticipated final rule in May 2014
3

# SIP Requirements for Areas 

# that are Nonattainment for the 2008 Ozone NAAQS

4

# Purposes of the Rulemaking

• To provide states with clear rules and guidance for meeting the 2008 ozone NAAQS in designated nonattainment areas.



# • To translate ozone implementation requirements contained in the 1990 Clean Air Act Amendments (written specific for the 1
- hour standard) into meaningful requirements for the 2008 8
- hour ozone 

# NAAQS.

• To revoke the 1997 8
- hour ozone NAAQS and establish in order to provide additional flexibility to 

# areas still working to complete the control requirements of that NAAQS.
5

# Preamble Outline of SIP Requirements Rule

A. Nonattainment area SIP deadlines B. Modeling and attainment demonstration requirements C. RFP requirements D. RACM and RACT requirements E. Vehicle I/M F. Transportation conformity G. General conformity H. Contingency measures I. NSR J. Emission inventory and emission statement requirements K. Ambient monitoring requirements L. 1
- year attainment deadline extensions M. Transport of ground
- level ozone for rural nonattainment areas, multi
- state nonattainment areas, and international transport N. Section 182(f) NOx provisions O. Emissions benefits of energy efficiency/renewable energy programs, land use planning, and travel efficiency P. Multi
- pollutant approach to developing SIPs Q. Tribes R. Ozone Transport Regions (OTRs) S. Additional requirements related to enforcement and compliance T. Emergency episodes U. Clean Data Policy V. Assistance W. Section 185 penalty fee provision for Severe and Extreme areas

6

# CAA Nonattainment Area SIP

Submittal Deadlines

• Note: Infrastructure SIPs were due March 2011.The EPA already made findings of failure to submit, and started FIP clocks for states that did not submit a complete SIP.

• The CAA establishes maximum statutory deadlines for submitting various 

### SIP elements.

– Emission inventories and emission statement SIPs are due from states with Marginal and higher areas 2 years after the effective date of designation (July 20, 2014).

– RACT SIPs are due from Moderate and higher areas, and all states within the OTR, 2 years after the effective date of designation (July 20, 2014).

– 15% RFP SIPs are due 3 years after the effective date of designation (July 20, 2015).

– Attainment plan (RACM) and attainment demonstration SIPs due 3 or 4 years after designation (July 20, 2015 for Moderate areas; July 20, 2016, for Serious and higher areas)

– RFP SIPs showing an average of 3% reductions in emissions per year after the initial 6
- year period are due 4 years after the effective date of designations from Serious and higher areas (July 20, 2016).

– § 185 penalty fee program SIPs are due from Severe and Extreme areas within 10 years (July 20, 2022)


### • If EPA determines that an area attains before SIPs are due, the planning SIP submittal requirements due at 3 years can be suspended (Clean Data Policy).

7

# Proposed SIP Due Dates

• We are proposing two options for deadlines for nonattainment area SIPs (RACT SIPs, attainment demonstration SIPs, and RFP SIPs):

– Option 1: timeframe provided by statute.

– Option 2 (preferred): states may choose to submit SIPs in timeframe provided by statute, or they may submit a combined submittal of emissions inventory, emission statement, RACT, RFP, attainment plan (RACM), and attainment demonstration SIPs at 30 months (November 20, 2014).



## • Serious and above areas have 4 years to develop attainment demonstration and RFP SIPs.

• SIP Deadline for Severe/Extreme Areas Penalty Fee Programs ( § 185).

– Propose deadline of 10
- years from effective date of designations (July 20, 2022).

– Similar to CAA requirement for 1
- hour standard.

8

# Modeling Attainment Demonstrations

9 

## • Serious and above areas (and multi
- state Moderate areas) are 

## required to use photochemical grid modeling to demonstrate attainment.

• Moderate areas are required to use photochemical modeling as well. However, an alternative approach can be used for Moderate areas if the Administrator determines that it is at least as effective.



## • Model results are used to determine the amount of VOC and/or NOx emission reductions that are needed for the area to attain the NAAQS.



## • EPA has specified approved models and has issued guidance. http://www.epa.gov/scram001/guidance/guide/final
- 03
- pm - rh
- guidance.pdf.



## • The rule directs the reader to the current modeling guidance.

• The guidance addresses how high electricity demand days (HEDDs) can be characterized.

• EPA does plan to update the guidance for the 2008 ozone NAAQS.

# Reasonable Further Progress (RFP)

Proposals

• Recommend areas use 2011 as a base year for RFP.

– Corresponds to PEI year



### • Allow areas to choose base year for RFP calculations that pre
- dates 2011.

– Allows areas that began early reductions in 2008 when standard was set to take credit for those reductions in RFP plans.

– In exchange for flexibility, areas need to provide additional 3% per year RFP for each year that is prior to 2011 (e.g., a 2008 baseline year would require 15% + 3x3% = 24% reduction for years 2009 through 2017).



### • Credit for reductions only from within the same nonattainment area.

– We are requesting specific comment on a legal basis for crediting reductions from outside the nonattainment area toward RFP.



### • Eliminate “pre
- 1990 adjustments” calculation for RFP.

– Proposing that states no longer need to calculate and deduct emissions related to pre
1990 motor vehicle, RVP, and vehicle I/M program corrections (per CAA section 182(b)(1)(D)).

– Credit reductions are very small and the calculations are tedious.

10

# Options for 15 % VOC Reduction for First

6 Years (RFP)

• 15% reduction plan is required for Moderate and above areas and all areas of the OTR.

– CAA requires these reductions to be VOC
- only, even though NOx reductions are now known in some cases to be more effective at reducing ozone.

– Additional VOC reductions could be difficult to achieve for some existing nonattainment areas
.


### • Proposing to allow all areas to substitute NOx for VOC in the 15% SIP, including any area that previously met 15% RFP 1
- hr or 1997 NAAQS, and any area that can demonstrate achievement of 15% VOC reduction from 1990 baseline.

– Alternatively, proposing to allow such substitution for OTR areas that can demonstrate achievement of a 15% VOC reduction from 1991
- 1996.



### • Areas classified Serious and higher are required to achieve an average of 

### 3%/year reduction in emissions (can be VOC, NOx or a combination) starting 6 years after designation until the attainment date.
11

# Vehicle and Fuels Requirements

• Gasoline vapor recovery

– ORVR is now in sufficient use that the requirement for Stage II vapor recovery systems at fuel dispensing stations can be waived in non
- OTR areas. Stage II previously applied to Serious and above areas. (77 FR 28772)

– EPA issued separate guidance on phasing out existing SIP
- approved Stage II programs


### • Vehicle inspection and maintenance programs are required in all Moderate and above ozone nonattainment areas with a population over 200,000 (or over 100,000 for OTR).

– There are currently no new I/M areas.



### • In this proposal, EPA solicits comment on aligning the I/M SIP deadline with the attainment SIP deadline.

• EPA also notes ability to approve alternative mobile source controls getting equivalent reductions in place of I/M.

• Lastly, EPA identifies implementation flexibilities for I/M programs made possible by predominance of onboard diagnostics (OBD) in current fleet.

12

# Anti - Backsliding Requirements 

# for 1 - hour and 1997 Ozone NAAQS Nonattainment Areas

# Anti - backsliding

• Proposing revocation of the 1997 ozone NAAQS on the date the final SIP Requirements Rule is published in the Federal Register.

• Areas still designated nonattainment for the 1997 or 1
- hour NAAQS on that date will be subject to anti
- backsliding requirements.

• Proposed anti
- backsliding requirements reflect D.C. Circuit decisions on anti
- backsliding and would codify approaches we use now in implementing 1
- hour NAAQS anti
- backsliding.

– Section 185 fee programs, contingency measures for failure to make RFP or attain, and nonattainment NSR are “applicable requirements” 

### that, in accordance with court decisions, continue to apply after 1997 ozone NAAQS is revoked.

– Two valid paths to fulfilling anti
- backsliding requirements (more detail on next slide).



## • For 2008 NAAQS nonattainment areas with unmet SIP obligations for the 1997 NAAQS, we encourage states to develop 2008 NAAQS SIPs that achieve goals of both 1997 and 2008 ozone NAAQS. 14

# Anti - backsliding summary

15 Designation for 2008 NAAQS Designation for

previous NAAQS (at time of revocation) Proposed NSR/PSD obligations Other proposed transition obligations

1. Attainment Attainment/

Maintenance PSD remains in effect

- Area remains subject to existing section 175A maintenance plan for the previous ozone NAAQS and requirements already in the SIP, subject to revision consistent with sections 110(l) and 193

- Section 175A maintenance plan satisfies maintenance requirement under section 110(a)(1). 2. Attainment Nonattainment for

1997 ozone NAAQS only; or nonattainment for 1997 and 1

- hour NAAQS Nonattainment NSR

in effect until revocation of the 1997 ozone NAAQS; then PSD applies - Area remains subject to measures to meet nonattainment

requirements already in its adopted SIP. Removable only with a section 110(l) demonstration and a section 193 demonstration if applicable.

- Two alternatives to address section 110(a)(1) maintenance provision: a) Area’s approved PSD SIP satisfies section 110(a)(1) maintenance provision, or b) additional maintenance showing under section 110(a)(1) 3. Nonattainment Attainment/

Maintenance Nonattainment NSR

applies based on 2008 ozone NAAQS classification - Area remains subject to existing section 175A maintenance plan

for the previous NAAQS and requirements already in the SIP, subject to revision consistent with sections 110(l) and 193 4. Nonattainment Nonattainment for

1997 ozone NAAQS only; or nonattainment for 1997 and 1

- hour ozone NAAQS Nonattainment NSR

applies based on highest applicable classification - Area subject to all applicable anti

- backsliding requirements for 1

-

hr and/or 1997 NAAQS

- Anti

- backsliding obligations lifted when the area either is redesignated to attainment for the 2008 ozone NAAQS, or the EPA approves a redesignation substitute for the revoked 1

- hour or 1997 NAAQS

- EPA solicits comment on additional options for lifting anti

backsliding obligations.

# Questions?

Karl Pepple, Ph.D. 

# OAQPS/AQPD/SLPG pepple.karl@epa.gov 

# 206.553.1778

16

# APPENDICES

17Area Designations for 2008 Ozone NAAQS (Effective July 20, 2012)

St. Louis S heboygan

Chicago

Dallas Upper Green River Basin

Uintah Basin Denver

Houston Memphis

Baton Rouge Atlanta Cincinnati

Knoxville Charlotte Columbus Cleveland Jamestown

Pittsburgh Washington DC/VA Baltimore

Seaford DE New York Philadelphia Greater Connecticut Allentown Dukes MA
Lancaster Reading

Phoenix San Diego Calaveras Co

San Luis Obispo

Tuscan Buttes

Ventura Co Morongo Tribe Pechanga Tribe Chico

Mariposa Co San Francisco Sacramento

San Joaquin Valley

Riverside Co Nevada Co

LA - South Coast West Mojave

E. Kern Co

Imperial Co

1819 Morongo Tribe

Pechanga Tribe X N ONATTAINMENT A REAS FOR 2008 O ZONE NAAQS BY C LASSIFICATION

(E FFECTIVE J ULY 20, 2012)