alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit






EXHIBIT 10(xli)




FIRST AMENDMENT TO 
ANADARKO PETROLEUM CORPORATION
2008 DIRECTOR COMPENSATION PLAN  



WHEREAS, Anadarko Petroleum Corporation (the “Company”) has heretofore established and currently maintains the Anadarko Petroleum Corporation 2008 Director Compensation Plan (the “Plan”) for the benefit of non-employee members of the Company’s Board of Directors (the “Board”); and
WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 16.7 of the Plan, the Plan may be amended at any time, and from time to time, by the Compensation and Benefits Committee of the Board (the “Committee”); and
WHEREAS, the Committee desires to amend the Plan on behalf of the Company to impose certain limitations on the compensation that the Company may pay to the non-employee members of the Board; 


NOW, THEREFORE, effective as of February 8, 2016, the Plan is hereby amended as follows:
1.The Plan is hereby amended by adding the following new Section 16.12 to the end of Section 16 of the Plan:
“16.12    Compensation and Award Limitations
Notwithstanding any provisions to the contrary in the Plan, in any other incentive compensation plan of the Company or any of its subsidiaries (including, without limitation, the Company’s 2012 Omnibus Incentive Compensation Plan or any successor plan thereto), or any other compensatory policy or program of the Company applicable to the Eligible Directors (collectively, the “Director Programs”), the sum of “A” and “B” for any individual Eligible Director for any single calendar year beginning on or after January 1, 2016 shall not exceed $750,000, where:
		
	“A”
	equals the aggregate grant date fair value (computed as of the date of grant in accordance with applicable financial accounting rules) of all awards granted under the Director Programs (other than with respect to compensation described in “B” below) to such Eligible Director during such calendar year; and


		
	“B”
	equals the aggregate cash value of such Eligible Director’s retainer, meeting attendance fees, committee assignment fees, lead director retainer, committee chair and member retainers and other Board fees related to service on the Board or committee(s) of the Board that are initially denominated as a cash amount or any other property other than Common Stock (whether paid currently or on a deferred basis or in cash or other property (including Common Stock)) for such calendar year;











provided, however, that the limitation described in this sentence shall be determined without regard to grants of awards under the Director Programs and compensation, if any, paid to an Eligible Director during any period in which such individual was an employee, consultant or independent contractor providing services to the Company or any of its subsidiaries (other than in the capacity of an Eligible Director).”
2.As amended hereby, the Plan is specifically ratified and reaffirmed.


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this First Amendment to the Plan to be executed on this 8th day of February 2016.
    
	
		
	ANADARKO PETROLEUM CORPORATION

	 
	 

	 
	 

	By:
	/s/ Julia A. Struble

	 
	Julia A. Struble

	 
	Vice President, Human Resources






           

-2-
# Materials Not Included in **Airworthiness Directive (AD) Docket**

Docket Number: F AA - 2013 - 0425 Directorate Identifier: 2012NM224AD

747 - 53A2427, R6 --- 7/14/11

Name/Description of Item(s) Not Included in FDMS Docket and Maintained in the Supplemental AD Docket 

### MA **Y BE VIEWED AT:** Federal Aviation Administration

Transport Airplane Directorate Rules Docket 1601 Lind Ave. SW., Renton, WA 98057 425.227.1221 **DURING THE HOURS OF:** 9 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. Form Date: 0 3/05/2008
Consent of Independent Certified Public Accountants

Consent of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

September 8, 1999

We consent to the  incorporation by reference in the registration  statements of
Modis Professional Services,  Inc. on Form S-3 (Reg. Nos. 333-17715,  333-18695,
333-49505  and  333-67271)  and on Form  S-8  (Reg.  Nos.  33-99262,  333-06899,
333-15701,  333-16043,  333-30455,  333-41305,  333-49495, 333-49493, 333-58261,
333-69915  and  333-79001)  of our report dated March 26, 1999, on our audits of
the consolidated financial statements of Modis Professional Services, Inc. as of
December 31, 1998 and 1997,  and for each of the three years in the period ended
December 31,  1998,  which  report is included in the  Company's  filing on Form
10-K/A.


PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Jacksonville, Florida
**Exhibit 32**

 

 

**Certification of Chief Executive Officerand Principal Financial Officer**

**Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as AdoptedPursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

I, James P. Foran, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C.Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the quarterly report on Form 10-Q forthe quarterly period ended March 31, 2013 of JPX Global, Inc. fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of JPX Global, Inc.

 

Date: May 20, 2013

 

By:	*/s/ James P. Foran*	

James P. Foran

Chief Executive Officer

and Principal Financial Officer
#### Hedwig Moore, Respondent, v Round Hill Management Company, Appellant.

Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Lewis R. Friedman, J.), entered December 13, 1989, which found in favor of plaintiff against defendant in the sum of $61,546, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Plaintiff commenced this action to recover damages for personal injury sustained when she fell down the allegedly defective stairs of defendant’s apartment building. Plaintiff’s expert opined that the stairwell did not meet applicable standards. Both parties made reference to the New York City Building Code although the building was constructed prior to its enactment. The court charged, *inter alia,*that the jury could consider violation of the Code as some evidence of negligence. The court found liability against defendant and apportioned responsibility at 60% for plaintiff and 40% for defendant.

The weight of credible evidence supports the jury’s liability verdict against defendant based upon a combination of plaintiff’s testimony and the expert testimony with respect to the stairway geometry and lighting. Further, defendant had, at minimum, constructive notice of the structural defects *(see, Batton v Elghanayan,*43 NY2d 898). Although the building was constructed prior to enactment of the Building Code, plaintiff’s expert testified regarding uniform standards of construction over two hundred years that were included in the Code. Defendant’s expert thereafter testified that the treads and risers had comported with the Code. While it would normally have been error for the court to instruct the jury that a Code violation might constitute some evidence of negli*407gence *(Biener v City of New York,*47 AD2d 520, 521), as defendant exploited the expert testimony regarding the Code, defendant may not now claim the instructions should not have been given. In effect, the parties charted their own course, which is the law of the case. Concur—Sullivan, J. P., Ellerin, Kupferman, Ross and Rubin, JJ.
Exhibit
23.1


CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT
REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM


American Technology Corporation
San Diego, California

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the
Registration Statements on Forms S-8 (File No. 333-09265, File No. 333-09269,
File No. 333-23845, File No. 333-59929, File No 333-54034 and File No.
333-101279) and Forms S-3 (File No. 333-27455, File No. 333-36003, File No.
333-71351, File No. 333-99675, File No. 333-36000, File No. 333-105740, File No.
333-107635 and 333-122264) of our report dated November 10, 2004, except for
Note 14 as to which the date is December 23, 2004, relating to the financial
statements of American Technology Corporation appearing in the Company's Annual
Report on Form 10-K/A Amendment #2 for the year ended September 30, 2004.

/s/ BDO Seidman, LLP

Costa Mesa, CA
March 16, 2005
[Cite as Ferrell v. Ohio State Univ. Med. Ctr., 2023-Ohio-4890.]

IN THE COURT OF CLAIMS OF OHIO

{¶1} On December 28, 2023, in M.F. v. Ohio State Univ. Med. Ctr., 10th Dist. 

Franklin No. 23AP-297, 2023-Ohio-4799, ¶ 23, the Tenth District Court of Appeals 

reversed this Court’s judgment and remanded this matter for further proceedings in 

accordance with law and consistent with the court of appeals’ decision. In M.F. at ¶ 19, 

the court of appeals instructed: “[W]e are not remanding the case for a new trial; rather, 

we are remanding the case for the Court of Claims to review Dr. Duboe’s videorecorded 

trial deposition testimony and determine whether that testimony alters its previous 

disposition on M.F.’s claims.”

{¶2} The Court has reviewed the two-plus hour videorecorded trial testimony of 

Fred J. Duboe, M.D., as directed by the Tenth District Court of Appeals.1 After reviewing 

Dr. Duboe’s videorecorded trial testimony, the Court finds that Dr. Duboe’s videorecorded 

trial testimony does not alter the Court’s previous disposition of the claims (including 

M.F.’s claims) in this case. The Court is unable to determine the proximate cause of 

Cameroun Ferrell's injuries. Based upon the testimony of all witnesses, as well as Dr. 

Duboe’s videorecorded trial testimony, the Court determines that the weight of the

evidence is equally balanced and, consequently, Plaintiffs have failed to prove their 

1 A written copy of the deposition was not filed with the court.

MEGAN FERRELL, et al.

 Plaintiffs

 v. 

THE OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY 

MEDICAL CENTER, et al.

 Defendants

Case No. 2018-00002JD

Judge Dale A. Crawford

DECISION
Case No. 2018-00002JD -2- DECISION

claims by a preponderance of the evidence in this matter. Judgment will again be entered 

in favor of Defendants.

DALE A. CRAWFORD

Judge
[Cite as Ferrell v. Ohio State Univ. Med. Ctr., 2023-Ohio-4890.]

IN THE COURT OF CLAIMS OF OHIO

{¶3} For reasons stated in the Decision filed concurrently herewith, judgment is 

entered in favor of Defendants. Court costs are assessed equally against Plaintiffs. The

Clerk shall serve upon all parties notice of this judgment and its date of entry upon the 

journal.

DALE A. CRAWFORD

Judge

Filed December 29, 2023

Sent to S.C. Reporter 1/30/24

MEGAN FERRELL, et al.

 Plaintiffs

 v. 

THE OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY 

MEDICAL CENTER, et al.

 Defendants

Case No. 2018-00002JD

Judge Dale A. Crawford

JUDGMENT ENTRY
# Az Európai Unió C 262I/2021

| | ISSN 1977-0979 |
| --- | --- |
| Az Európai Unió
  Hivatalos Lapja | C 262I |
| | |
| Magyar nyelvű kiadás | Tájékoztatások és közlemények | 64. évfolyam2021. július 5. |

ISSN 1977-0979

Az Európai Unió

Hivatalos Lapja

C 262I

Magyar nyelvű kiadás

Tájékoztatások és közlemények

64. évfolyam2021. július 5.

---

| Tartalom | Oldal |
| --- | --- |
| | IV   Tájékoztatások |
| | A TAGÁLLAMOKTÓL SZÁRMAZÓ TÁJÉKOZTATÁSOK |
| 2021/C 262 I/01 | A tagállamok által a halászat tilalmával összefüggésben nyújtott tájékoztatás | 1 |

Tartalom

Oldal

IV   Tájékoztatások

A TAGÁLLAMOKTÓL SZÁRMAZÓ TÁJÉKOZTATÁSOK

2021/C 262 I/01

A tagállamok által a halászat tilalmával összefüggésben nyújtott tájékoztatás

1

---

| HU | |
| --- | --- |

HU

---

IV Tájékoztatások

A TAGÁLLAMOKTÓL SZÁRMAZÓ TÁJÉKOZTATÁSOK

| 2021.7.5. | HU | Az Európai Unió Hivatalos Lapja | CI 262/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2021.7.5.

HU

Az Európai Unió Hivatalos Lapja

CI 262/1

---

A tagállamok által a halászat tilalmával összefüggésben nyújtott tájékoztatás

(2021/C 262 I/01)

A közös halászati politika szabályainak betartását biztosító uniós ellenőrző rendszer létrehozásáról szóló, 2009. november 20-i 1224/2009/EK tanácsi rendelet (1) 35. cikke (3) bekezdésének megfelelően olyan határozat született, amely halászati tilalmat rendel el az alábbi táblázatban foglaltak szerint:

| A tilalom bevezetésének dátuma és időpontja | 2021.6.3. |
| --- | --- |
| Időtartam | 2021.6.3. – 2021.12.31. |
| Tagállam | Franciaország |
| Állomány vagy állománycsoport | ANF/8C3411 |
| Faj | Ördöghalfélék (Lophiidae) |
| Övezet | 8c, 9 és 10; a CECAF 34.1.1 övezet uniós vizei |
| Halászhajótípus(ok) | --- |
| Hivatkozási szám | 08/TQ92 |

A tilalom bevezetésének dátuma és időpontja

2021.6.3.

Időtartam

2021.6.3. – 2021.12.31.

Tagállam

Franciaország

Állomány vagy állománycsoport

ANF/8C3411

Faj

Ördöghalfélék (Lophiidae)

Övezet

8c, 9 és 10; a CECAF 34.1.1 övezet uniós vizei

Halászhajótípus(ok)

---

Hivatkozási szám

08/TQ92

---

(1)  HL L 343., 2009.12.22., 1. o.

---
```

[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 173 (Thursday, September 6, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Pages 45298-45299]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-19228]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 10533]

Notice of Determinations; Culturally Significant Objects Imported 
for Exhibition--Determinations: ``The Charterhouse of Bruges: Jan Van 
Eyck, Petrus Christus, and Jan Vos'' Exhibition

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: I 
hereby determine that certain objects to be included in the exhibition 
``The Charterhouse of Bruges: Jan Van Eyck, Petrus Christus, and Jan 
Vos,'' imported from abroad for temporary exhibition within the United 
States, are of cultural significance. The objects are imported pursuant 
to loan agreements with the foreign owners or custodians. I also 
determine that the exhibition or display of the exhibit objects at The 
Frick Collection, New York, New York, from on or about September 18, 
2018, until on or about January 13, 2019, and at possible additional 
exhibitions or venues yet to be determined, is in the national 
interest. I have ordered that Public Notice of these determinations be 
published in the Federal Register.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Elliot Chiu, Attorney-Adviser, Office 
of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State (telephone: 202-632-
6471; email: [email protected]). The mailing address is U.S. 
Department of State, L/PD, SA-5, Suite 5H03, Washington, DC 20522-0505.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The foregoing determinations were made

[[Page 45299]]

pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 
(79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), E.O. 12047 of March 27, 1978, the 
Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 Stat. 2681, 
et seq.; 22 U.S.C. 6501 note, et seq.), Delegation of Authority No. 234 
of October 1, 1999, and Delegation of Authority No. 236-3 of August 28, 
2000.

Marie Therese Porter Royce,
Assistant Secretary for Educational and Cultural Affairs, Department of 
State.
[FR Doc. 2018-19228 Filed 9-5-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4710-05-P
```
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Cardo Medical, Inc. (the "Company") for the year ended December 31, 2010
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Andrew A. Brooks, Chief Executive
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  §1350, as adopted pursuant to  §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to
my knowledge:

1.	The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended, and

2.	The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.



| | /s/ Andrew A. Brooks
                      Andrew A. BrooksChief Executive Officer
| | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date:  March 31, 2011

---
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A18A1444. DAVID BRITT v. THE STATE.

In 2015, David Britt pled guilty to failing to register as a sex offender, and the

trial court sentenced him to eight years, with 421 days to serve in confinement and

the remainder on probation. In 2017, Britt filed a motion to vacate a void sentence

and conviction. The trial court denied the motion, and Britt appeals.

“[A] petition to vacate or modify a judgment of conviction is not an appropriate

remedy in a criminal case.” Harper v. State, 286 Ga. 216, 218 (1) (686 SE2d 786)

(2009). Any appeal from an order denying or dismissing such a motion must be

dismissed. See id. at 218 (2); Roberts v. State, 286 Ga. 532, 532 (690 SE2d 150)

(2010). A direct appeal may lie from an order denying a motion to vacate or correct

a void sentence, but only if the defendant raises a colorable claim that the sentence

is, in fact, void. See Harper, supra at 217 n.1; Burg v. State, 297 Ga. App. 118, 119

(676 SE2d 465) (2009). “Motions to vacate a void sentence generally are limited to

claimsthat – even assuming the existence and validity of the conviction for which the

sentence was imposed – the law does not authorize that sentence, most typically

because it exceedsthe mostsevere punishment for which the applicable penalstatute

provides.” von Thomas v. State, 293 Ga. 569, 572 (2) (748 SE2d 446) (2013). Thus,

when a sentence is within the statutory range of punishment, it is not void. Jones v.

State, 278 Ga. 669, 670 (604 SE2d 483) (2004).

Here, Britt assertsthat he has already served his sentence for the underlying sex

crime. He contends that any requirement that he register for a lifetime as a sex

offender is thus void. This argument, however, has been rejected by the Supreme

Court. See Hollie v. State, 287 Ga. 389, 390-391 (2) (696 SE2d 642) (2010). Because

May 15, 2018
Britt’s sentence falls within the statutory range of punishment, he has not alleged a

colorable void sentence claim.See OCGA § 42-1-12 (n) (punishmentrangesfromone

to 30 years). Accordingly, this appeal is hereby DISMISSED.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

05/15/2018
# Jornal Oficial C 262I/2021

| | ISSN 1977-1010 |
| --- | --- |
| Jornal Oficial
  da União Europeia | C 262I |
| | |
| Edição em língua portuguesa | Comunicações e Informações | 64.° ano5 de julho de 2021 |

ISSN 1977-1010

Jornal Oficial

da União Europeia

C 262I

Edição em língua portuguesa

Comunicações e Informações

64.° ano5 de julho de 2021

---

| Índice | Página |
| --- | --- |
| | IV   Informações |
| | INFORMAÇÕES DOS ESTADOS-MEMBROS |
| 2021/C 262 I/01 | Informações comunicadas pelos Estados-Membros a respeito do encerramento da pesca | 1 |

Índice

Página

IV   Informações

INFORMAÇÕES DOS ESTADOS-MEMBROS

2021/C 262 I/01

Informações comunicadas pelos Estados-Membros a respeito do encerramento da pesca

1

---

| PT | |
| --- | --- |

PT

---

IV Informações

INFORMAÇÕES DOS ESTADOS-MEMBROS

| 5.7.2021 | PT | Jornal Oficial da União Europeia | CI 262/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.7.2021

PT

Jornal Oficial da União Europeia

CI 262/1

---

Informações comunicadas pelos Estados-Membros a respeito do encerramento da pesca

(2021/C 262 I/01)

Em conformidade com o artigo 35.o, n.o 3, do Regulamento (CE) n.o 1224/2009 do Conselho, de 20 de novembro de 2009, que institui um regime de controlo da União a fim de assegurar o cumprimento das regras da política comum das pescas (1), foi decidido encerrar a pesca como indicado no quadro seguinte:

| Data e hora do encerramento | 3.6.2021 |
| --- | --- |
| Duração | 3.6.2021 – 31.12.2021 |
| Estado-Membro | França |
| Unidade populacional ou grupo de unidades populacionais | ANF/8C3411 |
| Espécie | Tamboril (Lophiidae) |
| Zona | 8c, 9, 10; águas da União da zona CECAF 34.1.1 |
| Tipo(s) de navio de pesca | --- |
| Número de referência | 08/TQ92 |

Data e hora do encerramento

3.6.2021

Duração

3.6.2021 – 31.12.2021

Estado-Membro

França

Unidade populacional ou grupo de unidades populacionais

ANF/8C3411

Espécie

Tamboril (Lophiidae)

Zona

8c, 9, 10; águas da União da zona CECAF 34.1.1

Tipo(s) de navio de pesca

---

Número de referência

08/TQ92

---

(1)  JO L 343 de 22.12.2009, p. 1.

---
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLAImages

# DLA Images

Search

Search

                                  - All Images 
                                  - Other 

                                  - Upload Date
                                  - Photo Date
                                  - Title

Share

----

Download Image: Small ()Medium ()Full Size (0.1 MB)

Tags:DLA Distribution, Defense Logistics Agency Distribution, dla, Defense Logistics Agency

Photo by:VIRIN: 

Photo Gallery