alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
From: Frey, Nathan J. <Nathan_J._Frey@omb.eop.gov> 

Sent: Saturday, July 18, 2015 2:52 PM 

To: Culligan, Kevin; Harvey, Reid; Vasu, Amy 

Cc: Szabo, Aaron; Grossman, Andrea 

Subject: RE: Summary of Interagency Comments Under EO12866 and 13563 -- Evaluation 

Measurement and Verification (EM&V) Guidance for CPP 

Attached please find an additional summary of interagency comments under EO 12866 and 13563 

on the draft EPA Evaluation Measurement and Verification (EM&V) Guidance for Demand-Side 

Energy Efficiency (EE). 

 

Thank you and please let me know if you have any questions. 

Nathan 

<< SummaryofinteragencycommentsunderEO12866_13563_EO 12866_EM&V 

Guidance7182015.docx >> 

 
Summary	of	Interagency	Working	Comments	on	Draft	Language	under

EO12866/13563	Interagency	Review.		Subject	to	Further	Policy	Review.   

1. Reviewers recognizes that comments pertaining to the “guidance” document may be addressed

in a separate document which describes the “regulatory requirements.” Are the regulatory

requirements included in the preamble or a separate TSD?  

2. Reviewer recommend that the guidance should clearly delineate the methods and protocols

that are pre‐approved or likely to be approved versus those that may be approved subject to

further EPA review.

a. Instead of providing a list of resources, reviewer recommend providing more specific

direction about what EM&V is required to generate efficiency ERCs.

b. Reviewer suggest using the terms: “likely to be approved” and “may be approved

pending review” – This structure would give entities some level of regulatory certainty,

while still allowing maximum flexibility. Reviewers believe entities will choose more

regulatory certain methods, which will likely reduce the administrative burden to EPA.  

c. Reviewers recommend that protocols from the Uniform Methods Project are listed

under the “likely to be approved” category.

3. Reviewers recommend adding a discussion of CHP and a discussion of T&D savings.  

4. Reviewers recommend that this guidance should explicitly be linked to the federal plan,

indicating that energy efficiency ERCs and allowances could be used under the federal plan if

they are created in accordance with the guidance.  

5. Reviewer recommend including (or referencing the location in the preamble or the TSD) the

steps required to generate efficiency ERCs. It would also be useful to include examples of roles

and responsibilities.

6. Reviewers recommend issuing a standard savings reporting form that includes a description of

evaluation methods. The Northeast Energy Efficiency Partnership standard reporting form could

serve as an example. Reviewers offer to provide technical assistance in this effort.
### C O U R T O F 

### A P P E A L S

S E C O N D D I S T R I C T O F T E X A S

CHIEF JUSTICE

BONNIE SUDDERTH

JUSTICES

LEE GABRIEL

ELIZABETH KERR

MARK T. PITTMAN

J. WADE BIRDWELL

DABNEY BASSEL

DANA WOMACK TIM CURRY CRIMINAL JUSTICE CENTER

401 W. BELKNAP, SUITE 9000

FORT WORTH, TEXAS 76196-0211

TEL: (817) 884-1900

FAX: (817) 884-1932

www.txcourts.gov/2ndcoa CLERK

DEBRA SPISAK

CHIEF STAFF ATTORNEY

LISA M. WEST

GENERAL COUNSEL

CLARISSA HODGES

April 18, 2019

Hon. Kimberly C. McCary

Judge, County Court at Law No. 1

210 S. Woodrow Ln.

Denton, TX 76205

* DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL *

Catherine Luft

Assistant Criminal District Attorney

1450 East McKinney, Ste. 3100

Denton, TX 76209

* DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL *

E. V.

Prudence Sanchez

Prudence Sanchez Attorney At Law,

PLLC

721 W. Mulberry St.

Denton, TX 76209

* DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL * C. A.

Juvenile Court Clerk, Denton County

Charlie J. Cole Bldg.

210 South Woodrow Lane

Denton, TX 76205-6304

* DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL *

Hon. David L. Evans

Regional Presiding Judge

Tom Vandergriff Civil Courts Building

100 N. Calhoun, 4th Floor

Fort Worth, TX 76196

* DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL *

RE: Court of Appeals Number: 02-19-00060-CV

02-19-00061-CV

Trial Court Case Number: JV-2017-00561

JV-2018-00016

Style: In the Matter of C.A., Jr.

Today the Second Court of Appeals issued an opinion and judgment in the

above-referenced cause. Copies of the opinion and judgment are attached and can

also be viewed on our Court’s webpage at: http://www.txcourts.gov/2ndcoa

.02-19-00060-CV

April 18, 2019

Page 2

Respectfully yours,

DEBRA SPISAK, CLERK
EXHIBIT 32.1

Exhibit 32.1Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) of the Exchange Act and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the annual report on Form 10-K of Advant-e Corporation (the Company) for the year ended December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the report), the undersigned, Jason K. Wadzinski, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:

(1) The report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and

(2) The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.



|                      |  |  |  |     |  |                        
|--------------------- |  |  |  | --- |  | -----------------------
|Dated: March 27, 2009 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/ Jason K. Wadzinski 
|                      |  |  |  |     |  | Jason K. Wadzinski     
|                      |  |  |  |     |  | Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit






Exhibit 10-O-9


Performance-Based Restricted Stock Unit Award Metrics for 2016


On February 10, 2016, the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of the Company approved the specific performance goals and business criteria to be used for purposes of determining any future performance-based restricted stock unit final awards for the 2016 performance-year for participants, including executive officers, under the Company’s shareholder-approved 2008 Long-Term Incentive Plan (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2008).


The performance-based restricted stock unit grant is a target opportunity; however, participants will have the opportunity to earn a maximum of up to 200% of the target.  The performance-based restricted stock unit grant has a three-year performance period (2016-2018), after which the Compensation Committee will determine the final award based on corporate performance-to-objectives. The maximum performance level that can be achieved for any single metric for the 2016 Performance Unit grants is 200%. 75% of the final award will be based on financial metrics and 25% will be based on relative Total Shareholder Return of Ford’s common stock compared to a peer group of companies over the three-year performance period.  The metrics and weightings are summarized below:


	
		
	Financial Metrics - 75%
	 

	Metrics 


Automotive Revenue
Automotive Operating Margin*
Ford Credit Profit Before Tax
Automotive Operating-Related Cash Flow*
	Weighting


25%
40%
10%
25%
100%

	 
	 




	
		
	 
	 

	Total Shareholder Return - 25%
	 

	Metric 


Total Shareholder Return (TSR)
	Weighting


100%




 


* Excludes special items
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk's Office, Atlanta, November 13, 2018. I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written. , Clerk. 

# Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA, November 13, 2018 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order A19D0135. IN THE INTEREST OF C. S. et al., CHILDREN (MOTHER) .
Upon consideration of the Application for Discretionary Appeal, it is ordered that it be hereby DENIED.
LC NUMBERS: 1801428 1801429
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Maritime Commission

          - [Docket No. 18-07]

Notice is given that a complaint has been filed with the Federal Maritime Commission (Commission) by Marine Transport Logistics, Inc., hereinafter “Complainant”, against CMA-CGM (America), LLC, hereinafter “Respondent”. Complainant states that it is a Non-Vessel Operating Common Carrier (NVOCC) located in Bayonne, New Jersey and is licensed with the Commission. Complainant asserts that Respondent is a Vessel Operating Common Carrier (VOCC) located in East Rutherford, New Jersey.

Complainant states that Respondent was contracted to ship nine containers of cars to Yemen in December 2017 and those containers were not delivered.

Specifically, Complainant alleges that the Respondent violated:

a. “. . . Section 41102(c) of the Shipping Act in that such respondent failed to establish, observe, and enforce just reasonable regulations and practices relating to or connected with receiving, handling, or delivering of property . . .”;

b. “. . . Section 41104(9) of the Shipping Act in that, such Respondent imposed undue and unreasonable prejudice or disadvantage . . .”; and

c. “. . . Section 41104 (10) of the Shipping Act in that, such Respondent unreasonably refused to deal or negotiate . . .”

                    Complainant seeks reparations and other relief. The full text of the complaint can be found in the Commission's Electronic Reading Room at                     *www.fmc.gov/​18-07/​.*                     This proceeding has been assigned to the Office of Administrative Law Judges.                

The initial decision of the presiding officer in this proceeding shall be issued by September 6, 2019, and the final decision of the Commission shall be issued by March 20, 2020.

Rachel E. Dickon, 

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2018-19638 Filed 9-10-18; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE 6731-AA-P
#### In re Petition of KSL TV (CHANNEL 5), KUTV, INC. (Channel 2), KTVX (Channel 4), KUED (Channel 7) and KBYU (Channel 11) for Modification of Canon 3(A)(7) and (8) of the Utah Code of Judicial Conduct.

No. 910368.

Supreme Court of Utah.

Sept. 16, 1991.

MINUTE ENTRY

That part of the petition requesting authorization of electronic media coverage in the Utah Court of Appeals is hereby granted, subject to the following conditions.

Installation of all necessary wiring and associated facilities needed to permit the use of television cameras shall be at the petitioners’ expense and shall be to the court’s satisfaction.

Furthermore, the notice provisions and general guidelines published in the Appendix to the Petition of Society of Professional Journalists, for Modification of Canon 3(A)(7) etc., published at 727 P.2d 200, shall apply equally to the Utah Supreme Court and the Utah Court of Appeals with one amendment. Appendix A sub-section (5) is hereby amended to read: “At least two working days’ written notice requesting media access shall be given to the court, unless good cause exists to justify shorter notice.”
```

[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 173 (Thursday, September 6, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Page 45233]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-19269]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. ER18-2335-000]

Supplemental Notice That Initial Market-Based Rate Filing 
Includes Request for Blanket Section 204 Authorization: Josco Energy 
USA, LLC

    This is a supplemental notice in the above-referenced proceeding 
Josco Energy USA, LLC's application for market-based rate authority, 
with an accompanying rate tariff, noting that such application includes 
a request for blanket authorization, under 18 CFR part 34, of future 
issuances of securities and assumptions of liability.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest should file with the 
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE, Washington, 
DC 20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's 
Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). Anyone 
filing a motion to intervene or protest must serve a copy of that 
document on the Applicant.
    Notice is hereby given that the deadline for filing protests with 
regard to the applicant's request for blanket authorization, under 18 
CFR part 34, of future issuances of securities and assumptions of 
liability, is September 19, 2018.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and 
interventions in lieu of paper, using the FERC Online links at http://www.ferc.gov. To facilitate electronic service, persons with internet 
access who will eFile a document and/or be listed as a contact for an 
intervenor must create and validate an eRegistration account using the 
eRegistration link. Select the eFiling link to log on and submit the 
intervention or protests.
    Persons unable to file electronically should submit an original and 
5 copies of the intervention or protest to the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE, Washington, DC 20426.
    The filings in the above-referenced proceeding are accessible in 
the Commission's eLibrary system by clicking on the appropriate link in 
the above list. They are also available for electronic review in the 
Commission's Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an 
eSubscription link on the website that enables subscribers to receive 
email notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). 
For assistance with any FERC Online service, please email 
[email protected] or call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For TTY, 
call (202) 502-8659.

    Dated: August 30, 2018.
Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2018-19269 Filed 9-5-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
```
Exhibit 31.4

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

EXCHANGE ACT RULES 13a-14(a) AND 15d-14(a),

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Brant Meleski, certify that:

| 1. | I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of InfraREIT, Inc.; |
|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; and |
|----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 3. | Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report. |
|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

| Date: November 13, 2018 | /s/ Brant Meleski                                 |
|-------------------------|---------------------------------------------------|
|                    | Brant Meleski                                     |
|                    | Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
|                    | (Principal Financial Officer)                     |
I

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 4096

To ensure that certain unresolved commercial disputes between American

firms and Saudi Arabia are resolved satisfactorily.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 21, 1994

Mr. HILLIARD introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Foreign Affairs

A BILL

To ensure that certain unresolved commercial disputes between American firms and Saudi Arabia are resolved

satisfactorily.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. STEPS TO RESOLVE COMMERCIAL DISPUTES

4 WITH SAUDI ARABIA.

5 The President is encouraged to take, within 60 days

6 after the date of enactment of this Act, all necessary and

7 appropriate steps to ensure that the unresolved American

8 commercial claims against Saudi Arabia are resolved satis9 factorily. Such steps should include the issuance of a dip10 lomatic demarche to the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia re-
2

•HR 4096 IH

1 questing that American firms be quickly and justly com2 pensated for damage resulting from their contract dis3 putes with the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.

4 SEC. 2. REPORTING REQUIREMENT.

5 Not later than 30 days after the date of enactment

6 of this Act, the President shall report to the appropriate

7 committees of the Congress on the specific steps that the

8 United States Government has taken, in accordance with

9 this Act and section 9140(b) of the Department of De10 fense Appropriations Act, 1993 (Public Law 102–396), to

11 ensure that the unresolved American commercial claims

12 against Saudi Arabia are resolved satisfactorily.

13 SEC. 3. DEFINITIONS.

14 For purposes of this Act—

15 (1) the term ‘‘resolved satisfactorily’’ means the

16 settlement of an unresolved American commercial

17 claim against Saudi Arabia—

18 (A) that results in the signing by the

19 American firm of a legally executable release;

20 and

21 (B) that is consistent with the commitment

22 of the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia to resolve such

23 claims on a ‘‘mutually fair basis’’, such commit24 ment having been communicated to the Con25 gress in the report of the Secretary of Defense
3

•HR 4096 IH

1 dated March 6, 1993 that was submitted pursu2 ant to section 9140(c) of the Department of

3 Defense Appropriations Act, 1993 (Public Law

4 102–396); and

5 (2) the term ‘‘unresolved American commercial

6 claims against Saudi Arabia’’ means those claims of

7 American firms against the Kingdom of Saudi Ara8 bia—

9 (A) that were identified by the Department

10 of Commerce in a letter dated May 27, 1992,

11 to the Subcommittee on Europe and the Middle

12 East of the Committee on Foreign Affairs of

13 the United States House of Representatives;

14 (B) that were referred to in section 9140

15 of the Department of Defense Appropriations

16 Act, 1993 (Public Law 102–396); and

17 (C) that have not been resolved satisfac18 torily.

Æ
#### Barbara FLETCHER, Personal Representative and Next of Kin of Lawrence R. Lamb, Deceased, Appellant, v. AMITY CARE, INC., d/b/a Convalescent Center of Shattuck, Appellee.

No. 74258.

Court of Appeals of Oklahoma, Division 3.

April 30, 1991.

Mitchell A. Lee and Timothy W. Green, Oklahoma City, for appellant.

Mary Hanan, Oklahoma City, for appel-lee.

HUNTER, Chief Judge:

Appellant seeks reversal of the trial court’s denial of her motion for new trial.

Appellant filed her petition against Ap-pellee for damages arising out of the alleged wrongful death of her father. After discovery, Appellee filed a motion to dismiss on the basis that the court lacked jurisdiction because Kenneth Wayne Lamb, the decedent’s son had previously been appointed administrator of the estate of Lawrence R. Lamb and, as such, was the only authorized person, under the law, who could bring a wrongful death action on behalf of the estate. Appellant admitted that Kenneth Wayne Lamb had been duly appointed administrator of the estate but argued that the closing of the estate and *835discharge of the administrator made it possible for her to bring the action because the administrator declined to do so. The trial court dismissed the action on the basis that it was improperly brought. Appellant filed a motion for new trial alleging that the decision was contrary to law. Upon denial of the motion for new trial this appeal was timely commenced.

An action for wrongful death is purely statutory and, by statute, may only be brought by a person expressly authorized to do so. *Moon v. Ellis,*677 P.2d 668 (Okla.App.1984). The next of kin may not bring a wrongful death action when a personal representative has been appointed. Title 12 O.S.1981 § 1054. Appellant was never the duly appointed personal representative of the deceased. Unquestionably the trial court’s ruling was correct and is AFFIRMED.

GARRETT, P.J., and HANSEN, J., concur.
#### Robert Blumenthal, Respondent-Appellant, v Syracuse Savings Bank, Appellant-Respondent.

Motion to dismiss cross appeal denied. Memorandum: Defendant has not demonstrated that a notice of entry of the order was served with the order. Absent service of a written notice of entry, the time to take an appeal does not begin to run *(Malvin v Schwartz,*65 AD2d 769, *affd*48 NY2d 693). Present—Callahan, J. P., Doerr, Denman, Boomer and Pine, JJ.
Order entered January 14, 2013

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

 

No. 05-13-00927-CV

JASON MICHAEL SPENCER, Appellant

V.

DEXTRAL CAPITAL, LP, A DELAWARE LIMITED PARTNERSHIP AND DEXTRAL 

CAPITAL MANAGEMENT FUND, LP, A DELAWARE LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, Appellees

On Appeal from the 134th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 11-15530

ORDER

On December 5, 2013, we ordered court reporter Vielica Dobbins to file the reporter’s record no 

later than January 7, 2014. To date, the record has not been filed. Accordingly, we ORDER Vielica 

Dobbins, Official Court Reporter, to file the record no later than January 24, 2014. Arrangements for a 

substitute reporter must be made, if necessary, as no further extensions will be granted absent exigent 

circumstances. See TEX. R. APP. P. 35.3(c).

We DIRECT the Clerk of the Court to send a copy of this order by electronic transmission to (1) 

Vielica Dobbins, (2) the Honorable Dale Tillery, Presiding Judge of the 134th Judicial District Court, and 

(3) the parties.

/Elizabeth Lang-Miers/

ELIZABETH LANG-MIERS

JUSTICE
<page>			       EXHIBIT 32.01


CERTIFICATION OF PRESIDENT PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Annual Report of Morgan Stanley Spectrum
Strategic L.P. (the ?Partnership?) on Form 10-K for the period
ended December 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the ?Report?), I, Walter Davis,
President of Demeter Management Corporation, the general partner of
the Partnership, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that, to the best of my knowledge:

	(1)		The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

	(2)	The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of the Partnership.








By:	/s/Walter Davis

Name:	   Walter Davis
Title:	   President

Date:	   March 8, 2007