16456 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 62 / Thursday, April 1, 2010 / Notices 

FERC Online links at http:// 

www.ferc.gov. To facilitate electronic 

service, persons with Internet access 

who will eFile a document and/or be 

listed as a contact for an intervenor 

must create and validate an 

eRegistration account using the 

eRegistration link. Select the eFiling 

link to log on and submit the 

intervention or protests. 

Persons unable to file electronically 

should submit an original and 14 copies 

of the intervention or protest to the 

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 

888 First St. NE., Washington, DC 

20426. 

The filings in the above proceedings 

are accessible in the Commission’s 

eLibrary system by clicking on the 

appropriate link in the above list. They 

are also available for review in the 

Commission’s Public Reference Room in 

Washington, DC. There is an 

eSubscription link on the Web site that 

enables subscribers to receive e-mail 

notification when a document is added 

to a subscribed dockets(s). For 

assistance with any FERC Online 

service, please e-mail 

FERCOnlineSupport@ferc.gov. or call 

(866) 208–3676 (toll free). For TTY, call 

(202) 502–8659. 

Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time 

Monday, April 5, 2010. 

Kimberly D. Bose, 

Secretary. 

[FR Doc. 2010–7303 Filed 3–31–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6717–01–P 

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY 

Federal Energy Regulatory 

Commission 

[Project No. 12783–003] 

Inglis Hydropower, LLC; Notice 

Soliciting Scoping Comments 

March 26, 2010. 

Take notice that the following 

hydroelectric application has been filed 

with the Commission and is available 

for public inspection. 

a. Type of Application: Original Major 

License. 

b. Project No.: P–12783–003. 

c. Date filed: July 22, 2009. 

d. Applicant: Inglis Hydropower, LLC. 

e. Name of Project: Inglis Hydropower 

Project. 

f. Location: The proposed project 

would be located at the existing Inglis 

Bypass Channel and Spillway on the 

Withlacoochee River, west of Lake 

Rousseau and the existing Inglis Dam, 

within the town of Inglis, in Levy, 

Citrus, and Marion counties, Florida. No 

federal lands would be occupied by the 

proposed project. 

g. Filed Pursuant to: Federal Power 

Act 16 U.S.C. 791(a)–825(r). 

h. Applicant Contacts: Mr. Dean 

Edwards, P.O. Box 1565, Dover, FL 

33527, (813) 659–3014; and Mr. Kevin 

Edwards, P.O. Box 143, Mayodan, NC 

27027, (336) 589–6138. 

i. FERC Contact: Jennifer Adams at 

(202) 502–8087, or 

jennifer.adams@ferc.gov. 

j. Deadline for filing scoping 

comments: 30 days from the issuance 

date of this notice, or April 25, 2010. 

All documents may be filed 

electronically via the Internet. See 18 

CFR 385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the 

instructions on the Commission’s Web 

site (http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/ 

ferconline.asp) under the ‘‘eFiling’’ link. 

For a simpler method of submitting text 

only comments, click on ‘‘Quick 

Comment.’’ For assistance, please 

contact FERC Online Support at 

FERCOnlineSupport@ferc.gov; call tollfree at (866) 208–3676; or, for TTY, 

contact (202) 502–8659. Although the 

Commission strongly encourages 

electronic filing, documents may also be 

paper-filed. To paper-file, mail an 

original and eight copies to: Kimberly D. 

Bose, Secretary, Federal Energy 

Regulatory Commission, 888 First 

Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426. 

The Commission’s Rules of Practice 

require all intervenors filing documents 

with the Commission to serve a copy of 

that document on each person on the 

official service list for the project. 

Further, if an intervenor files comments 

or documents with the Commission 

relating to the merits of an issue that 

may affect the responsibilities of a 

particular resource agency, they must 

also serve a copy of the document on 

that resource agency. 

k. This application is not ready for 

environmental analysis at this time. 

l. The proposed 2.0-megawatt project 

would consist of: (1) A 45-foot-long by 

100-foot-wide intake conveying water 

from the Bypass Channel; (2) a 130-footlong penstock consisting of two 14-foot 

by 14-foot reinforced concrete conduits; 

(3) a 60-foot-long by 80-foot-wide by 30- 

foot-high concrete powerhouse 

containing two 0.8 megawatt (MW) and 

one 0.4 MW vertical shaft turbines; (4) 

a 100-foot-long concrete discharge 

channel carrying the water from the 

powerhouse back into the Bypass 

Channel below the spillway; (5) a new 

substation adjacent to the powerhouse; 

(6) a 120-foot long, 24-kilovolt 

transmission line connecting the project 

substation to the local utility; and (7) 

appurtenant facilities. The Inglis Project 

would generate approximately 12,300 

Megawatt-hours. 

m. A copy of the application is 

available for review at the Commission 

in the Public Reference Room, or may be 

viewed on the Commission’s website at 

http://www.ferc.gov using the ‘‘eLibrary’’ 

link. Enter the docket number, 

excluding the last three digits in the 

docket number field, to access the 

document. For assistance, contact FERC 

Online Support. A copy is available for 

inspection and reproduction at the 

address in item h above. 

You may also register online at 

http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/ 

esubscription.asp to be notified via email of new filings and issuances 

related to this or other pending projects. 

For assistance, contact FERC Online 

Support. 

n. Scoping Process: 

The Commission staff intends to 

prepare a single Environmental 

Assessment (EA) for the Inglis 

Hydropower Project in accordance with 

the National Environmental Policy Act. 

The EA will consider both site-specific 

and cumulative environmental impacts 

and reasonable alternatives to the 

proposed action. 

Commission staff does not propose to 

conduct any on-site scoping meetings at 

this time. Instead, we are soliciting 

comments, recommendations, and 

information on the Scoping Document 

(SD) issued on March 26, 2010. 

Copies of the SD outlining the subject 

areas to be addressed in the EA were 

distributed to the parties on the 

Commission’s mailing list and the 

applicant’s distribution list. Copies of 

the SD may be viewed on the Web at 

http://www.ferc.gov, using the 

‘‘eLibrary’’ link. Enter the docket 

number, excluding the last three digits 

in the docket number field, to access the 

document. For assistance, call 1–866– 

208–3676 or for TTY, (202) 502–8659. 

Kimberly D. Bose, 

Secretary. 

[FR Doc. 2010–7304 Filed 3–31–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6717–01–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

[EPA–R06–OAR–2008–0932; FRL–9132–9] 

Adequacy Status of the Beaumont-Port 

Arthur, TX Maintenance Plan; 8-Hour 

Ozone Motor Vehicle Emission 

Budgets for Transportation Conformity 

Purposes 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA). 

mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES

Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 62 / Thursday, April 1, 2010 / Notices 16457 

ACTION: Notice of adequacy 

determination. 

SUMMARY: EPA is notifying the public 

that it has found that the motor vehicle 

emissions budgets (MVEB) in the 

Beaumont-Port Arthur, Texas (BPA) 

Redesignation Request/Maintenance 

Plan State Implementation Plan (SIP) 

revision, submitted on December 16, 

2008, by the Texas Commission on 

Environmental Quality (TCEQ) are 

adequate for transportation conformity 

purposes. As a result of EPA’s finding, 

the BPA area must use these budgets for 

future conformity determinations for the 

1997 8-hour ozone standard. 

DATES: These budgets are effective April 

16, 2010. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

The essential information in this 

notice will be available at EPA’s 

conformity Web site: http:// 

www.epa.gov/otaq/stateresources/ 

transconf/adequacy.htm. You may also 

contact Mr. Jeffrey Riley, Air Planning 

Section (6PD–L), U.S. Environmental 

Protection Agency, Region 6, 1445 Ross 

Avenue, Dallas, Texas 75202–2733, 

telephone (214) 665–8542, E-mail 

address: Riley.Jeffrey@epa.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Throughout this document ‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us,’’ 

and ‘‘our’’ refers to EPA. The word 

‘‘budget(s)’’ refers to the mobile source 

emissions budget for volatile organic 

compounds (VOCs) and the mobile 

source emissions budget for nitrogen 

oxides (NOX). 

On December 16, 2008, we received a 

State Implementation Plan (SIP) 

revision from the Texas Commission on 

Environmental Quality (TCEQ). This 

revision consisted of a Redesignation 

Request/Maintenance Plan SIP for the 

Beaumont-Port Arthur (BPA) ozone 

nonattainment area. This submission 

established the motor vehicle emissions 

budgets (MVEB) for the BPA area for the 

year 2021. The MVEB is the amount of 

emissions allowed in the state 

implementation plan for on-road motor 

vehicles; it establishes an emissions 

ceiling for the regional transportation 

network. The MVEB is provided in 

Table 1: 

TABLE 1—BEAUMONT/PORT ARTHUR

NOX AND VOC MVEB 

[Summer season tons per day] 

2021 

NOX .............................................. * 7.24 

VOC .............................................. 4.77 

** Includes an allocation of 1 tpd from the 

available NOX safety margin. 

On April 15, 2009, EPA posted the 

availability of the BPA area budget on 

EPA’s Web site, as part of the adequacy 

process, for the purpose of soliciting 

public comments. The comment period 

closed on May 15, 2009, and we 

received no comments. 

Today’s notice is simply an 

announcement of a finding that EPA has 

already made. EPA Region 6 sent a letter 

to TCEQ on March 4, 2010, finding that 

the MVEB in the BPA Redesignation 

Request/Maintenance Plan SIP, 

submitted on December 16, 2008, is 

adequate and must be used for 

transportation conformity 

determinations in the BPA area. This 

finding has also been announced on 

EPA’s conformity Web site: http:// 

www.epa.gov/otaq/stateresources/ 

transconf/adequacy.htm. 

Transportation conformity is required 

by section 176(c) of the Clean Air Act. 

EPA’s conformity rule, 40 Code of 

Federal Regulations (CFR) part 93, 

requires that transportation plans, 

programs and projects conform to state 

air quality implementation plans and 

establishes the criteria and procedures 

for determining whether or not they do 

so. Conformity to a SIP means that 

transportation activities will not 

produce new air quality violations, 

worsen existing violations, or delay 

timely attainment of the national 

ambient air quality standards. 

The criteria by which EPA determines 

whether a SIP’s MVEB is adequate for 

transportation conformity purposes are 

outlined in 40 CFR 93.118(e)(4). We 

have also described the process for 

determining the adequacy of submitted 

SIP budgets in our July 1, 2004, final 

rulemaking entitled, ‘‘Transportation 

Conformity Rule Amendments for the 

New 8-hour Ozone and PM2.5 National 

Ambient Air Quality Standards and 

Miscellaneous Revisions for Existing 

Areas; Transportation Conformity Rule 

Amendments: Response to Court 

Decision and Additional Rule Changes’’ 

(69 FR 40004). Please note that an 

adequacy review is separate from EPA’s 

completeness review, and it should not 

be used to prejudge EPA’s ultimate 

approval of the BPA Redesignation 

Request/Maintenance Plan SIP revision 

submittal. Even if EPA finds a budget 

adequate, the Redesignation Request/ 

Maintenance Plan SIP revision 

submittal could later be disapproved. 

Within 24 months from the effective 

date of this notice, the transportation 

partners will need to demonstrate 

conformity to the new MVEB if the 

demonstration has not already been 

made, pursuant to 40 CFR 93.104(e). 

See, 73 FR 4419 (January 24, 2008). 

Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq. 

Dated: March 24, 2010. 

Lawrence E. Starfield, 

Acting Regional Administrator, Region 6. 

[FR Doc. 2010–7314 Filed 3–31–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

[EPA–HQ–OECA–2009–0530; FRL–9132–7] 

Agency Information Collection 

Activities; Submission to OMB for 

Review and Approval; Comment 

Request; NSPS for Wool Fiberglass 

Insulation Manufacturing Plants and 

NESHAP for Wool Fiberglass 

Manufacturing (Renewal), EPA ICR 

Number 1160.09, OMB Control Number 

2060–0114 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA). 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: In compliance with the 

Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 

3501 et seq.), this document announces 

that an Information Collection Request 

(ICR) has been forwarded to the Office 

of Management and Budget (OMB) for 

review and approval. This is a request 

to renew an existing approved 

collection. The ICR which is abstracted 

below describes the nature of the 

collection and the estimated burden and 

cost. 

DATES: Additional comments may be 

submitted on or before May 3, 2010. 

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, 

referencing docket ID number EPA–HQ– 

OECA–2009–0530, to (1) EPA online 

using http://www.regulations.gov (our 

preferred method), or by e-mail to 

docket.oeca@epa.gov, or by mail to: EPA 

Docket Center (EPA/DC), Environmental 

Protection Agency, Enforcement and 

Compliance Docket and Information 

Center, mail code 28221T, 1200 

Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., 

Washington, DC 20460, and (2) OMB at: 

Office of Information and Regulatory 

Affairs, Office of Management and 

Budget (OMB), Attention: Desk Officer 

for EPA, 725 17th Street, NW., 

Washington, DC 20503. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Robert C. Marshall, Jr., Office of 

Compliance, Mail code: 2223A, 

Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 

Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., 

Washington, DC 20460; telephone 

number: (202) 564–7021; fax number: 

(202) 564–0050; e-mail address: 

marshall.robert@epa.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: EPA has 

submitted the following ICR to OMB for 

mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES