alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 31.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

I, Nicholas Radesca, Chief Financial Officer of
Solar Senior Capital Ltd., certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Solar Senior Capital Ltd.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material
fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all
material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for
the registrant and have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which
this report is being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the
registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over
financial reporting; and

5. The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.

Dated this day of November 1, 2011



|                       
|-----------------------
|/S/    NICHOLAS
RADESCA
|Nicholas Radesca
#### Chris Evert, Respondent, v Banco Popular de Puerto Rico, Appellant.

Appeal from an order of Supreme Court, New York County (Harold Tompkins, J.), entered on January 25, 1990, which denied defendant’s motion pursuant to CPLR 327 for dismissal on the ground of *forum non conveniens,*granted plaintiff’s cross-motion for summary judgment pursuant to CPLR 3212, and directed entry of judgment in favor of the plaintiff, is deemed an appeal from a judgment of the same Court entered on April 16, 1990, in favor of the plaintiff and against the defendant in the total amount of $39,356.25, and the said judgment is unanimously affirmed, with costs.

The letter of credit at issue in this action was expressly to guarantee the plaintiff’s participation in a tennis tournament. The letter did not, however, make such participation a condition for payment, although certain other conditions were established under "Special Instructions.” Accordingly, the IAS Court properly concluded that the defendant was required to honor the letter when all actual conditions of that letter were satisfied *(see, Fertico Belgium v Phosphate Chems. Export Assn.,*100 AD2d 165). There is no reason why the doctrine of independent contracts *(see, First Commercial Bank v Gotham Originals,*64 NY2d 287) should not apply to stand-by letters of *325credit. That doctrine was appropriately applied by the IAS Court in this case. Defendant’s opposition to plaintiffs cross-motion for summary judgment consisted solely of an affirmation of counsel containing no allegations of fact, and was therefore insufficient to sustain defendant’s burden in opposing the summary judgment motion *(see, Tobron Off. Furniture Corp. v King World Prods.,*161 AD2d 355). Concur—Murphy, P. J., Carro, Kupferman and Smith, JJ.
ITRI EX-10.2 12.31.13






 Exhibit 10.2


CHANGE IN CONTROL AGREEMENTS


Richard B. Christensen
Richard J. Christensen
Michel C. Cadieux
Mark de Vere White
Barbara J. Doyle
Steven M. Helmbrecht
John W. Holleran
Byron Jackson
Phillip Le Bris
Chuck McAtee
Philip C. Mezey
Sharelynn F. Moore
Simon Pontin
Marcel Regnier *
Jared P. Serff
Russell E. Vanos
Shannon M. Votava








	
			
	 	*
	Mr. Regnier's change in control agreement includes a modification relating to French laws (Filed as Exhibit 10.2 to Itron, Inc.’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on April 2, 2012 - File No. 0-22418)
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### International Trade Commission

          - [USITC SE-18-040]

# Agency Holding the Meeting:

 United States International Trade Commission.

# TIME AND DATE:

 September 7, 2018 at 11:00 a.m.

# PLACE:

 Room 101, 500 E Street SW, Washington, DC 20436, Telephone: (202) 205-2000.

# STATUS:

 Open to the public.

# MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:

1. Agendas for future meetings: None.

2. Minutes.

3. Ratification List.

4. Vote on Inv. No. 731-TA-344 (Fourth Review) (Tapered Roller Bearings from China). The Commission is currently scheduled to complete and file its determination and views of the Commission by September 24, 2018.

5. Outstanding action jackets: None.

                    In accordance with Commission policy, subject matter listed above, not                           ( print page 44305)                        disposed of at the scheduled meeting, may be carried over to the agenda of the following meeting.                

By order of the Commission:

Issued: August 28, 2018.

William Bishop,

Supervisory Hearings and Information Officer.

[FR Doc. 2018-18987 Filed 8-28-18; 4:15 pm]

 BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
Exhibit 21.1



                         SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT



                        Company:                       Jurisdiction:
                        --------                       -------------
                 Marker Deutschland GmbH               Germany
                 Marker USA                            Utah
                 Marker Japan Co. Ltd.                 Japan
                 Marker Austria GmbH                   Austria
                 Marker Canada, Ltd.                   Canada
                 Marker Ltd.                           Utah
                 Marker AG                             Switzerland
                 DNR USA, Inc.                         Delaware
                 DNR North America, Inc.               Delaware
                 DNR Japan Co. Ltd.                    Japan
                 DNR Sportsystem, Ltd.1                Switzerland



                 1 An 80% owned Subsidiary of Marker AG
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

CHRISTOPHER PACE, CATERINA ITZI, 

and ADAM CRAWSHAW,

Appellants,

v.

ACES AUTOS, LLC and LENTEGRITY, 

LLC,

Appellees.

§

§

§

§

§

§

No. 08-23-00127-CV

Appeal from the

438th Judicial District Court

of Bexar County, Texas

(TC# 2021CI26178)

J U D G M E N T

The Court has considered this cause on the record and concludes the trial court’s judgment 

should be affirmed in part and reversed in part. The trial court’s take-nothing judgment in favor of 

Appellees’ is affirmed. The portion of the trial court’s judgment directing Crawshaw to pay 

Appellees $11,920 in attorney’s fees and $470.40 in costs as sanctions is reversed.

We further order that Appellants and Appellees shall each pay one-half of the costs of 

appeal, for which let execution issue. See TEX. R. APP. P. 43.5. This decision shall be certified 

below for observance.

IT IS ORDERED THIS 22ND DAY OF MARCH 2024.

JEFF ALLEY, Chief Justice

Before Alley, C.J., Palafox and Soto, JJ.
<partyblock><br><br><div align="center"><b><font size="+1">The People of the State of New York, Respondent,<br><br>against<br><br>Christopher Thomas, Defendant-Appellant.</font></b></div><br><br><p>Defendant appeals from a judgment of the Criminal Court of the City of New York, New York County (Robert M. Mandelbaum, J.), rendered June 1, 2012, after a nonjury trial, convicting him of attempted assault in the third degree and harassment in the second degree, and imposing sentence.</p><p>Per Curiam.</p><p>Judgment of conviction (Robert M. Mandelbaum, J.), rendered June 1, 2012, affirmed.</p><p>The verdict, in which the court rejected defendant's justification defense, was not against the weight of the evidence (<i>see People v Danielson</i>, 9 NY3d 342, 348-349 [2007]). There is no basis upon which to disturb the court's determinations concerning credibility. The victim's testimony, corroborated by that of a disinterested witness, established that defendant punched the retreating victim without provocation and then kicked him while he was on the ground (<a href="../2004/2004_05346.htm" target="_blank"><i>see People v Artis</i>, 8 AD3d 135</a>, 135 [2004]<i>, lv denied </i>3 NY3d 670 [2004]). </p><p>THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE COURT.</p><br>I concur I concur I concur<br>Decision Date: October 17, 2016<br><br><div align="center"><form method="LINK" action="../../slipidx/at_1_idxtable.shtml"><input type="submit" value="Return to Decision List"></form></div></partyblock>
CERTIFICATION OFCHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICERPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 I, Alexandre Frigon, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Xumanii, Inc. (the “Company”), hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge: (i)the annual report on Form 10-Q of the Company, for the period  ended January 31, 2013, and to which this certification is attached as Exhibit 32 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and(ii)the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  By:/s/Alexandre FrigonName:Alexandre FrigonTitle:Chief Executive Officer and ChiefFinancial OfficerDate:March 18, 2013 A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request. This certification accompanies the Form 10-Q to which it relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (whether made before or after the date of the Form 10-Q), irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.
Exhibit 32

Certification of CEO and CFO Pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

as Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the
quarterly report on Form 10-Q of TPG Specialty Lending, Inc. (the Company) for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2012, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), Michael
Fishman, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and John Viola, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to
such officers knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                    |  |                        
|------------------- |  | -----------------------
|/s/ Michael Fishman
|Name:               |  | Michael Fishman        
|Title:              |  | Chief Executive Officer
|Date:               |  | May 15, 2012           
|                   
|/s/ John E. Viola  
|Name:               |  | John E. Viola          
|Title:              |  | Chief Financial Officer
|Date:               |  | May 15, 2012           

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350 and is not being
filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly
Report of USMD Holdings, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Christopher Dunleavy, Chief Financial Officer of USMD Holdings, Inc., certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge and belief:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchanges Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of USMD Holdings, Inc.
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: September 8 2011



By:

/s/ Christopher DunleavyChristopher DunleavyChief Financial Officer


The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350; it is not
being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Registrant, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation
language in such filing.
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D18-1432

_____________________________

NORDEEN MAHMOUDI,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County.

Marianne L. Aho, Judge.

April 15, 2019

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

WETHERELL, OSTERHAUS, and WINOKUR, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________
2

Andy Thomas, Public Defender, and Steven L. Seliger, Assistant 

Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
Exhibit


EXHIBIT 10.17.3


Name:  David Heede


Address:  Weaver View, Bentley Fold, Ellastone, Ashbourne, Derbyshire, DE6 2GX  
United Kingdom


Date of Birth:  1 May 1961


In Burton on Trent on 1st April 2014
 David,
Secondment to Molson Coors Europe s.r.o.


Further to your secondment letter dated 24 September 2013, I confirm the following change to your employment Terms & Conditions, effective from 1st April 2014.


2.     DURING THE SECONDMENT


During the secondment:


(b) You will be a mobile worker maintaining a permanent residence in the UK.  You will be required to attend group locations throughout MCE as required of your duties, with a minimum requirement to spend at least 25% of your time in the performance of your duties in the United Kingdom (an average of 6 working days per month over the tax year).


With the exception of the above, all other Terms & Conditions set out in your original secondment letter dated 24 September 2013 remain the same.


Please sign, date and return the attached copy of this Letter to MCBC UK, at 137 High Street, Burton Upon Trent, Staffordshire DE 14 1JZ to the attention of Kate Holden, Head of ER Policy and Recruitment, MCBC UK within 5 working days of receipt, at the latest, to indicate your acceptance of the change in clause 2(b) of your original secondment letter dated 24 September 2013.  By your acceptance of the terms and conditions of this Letter this Letter shall form an agreement between you and MCBC UK on the terms and conditions of your secondment to MCE.


Yours sincerely,


Molson Coors Brewing Company (UK) Limited


name:  Anita Adam


authorization:  /s/ Anita Adam


Molson Coors Brewing Company (UK) Limited


name:  Kate Pearce


authorization:  /s/ Kate Pearce






To:    Molson Coors Brewing Company (UK) Limited


attn.:  Anita Adam and Kate Pearce (Designation of Officer)





EXHIBIT 10.17.3




		
	1.
	I hereby accept the terms and conditions of my secondment by Molson Coors Brewing Company (UK) Limited, whose registered office is at 137 High Street, Burton Upon Trent, DE14 1JZ, Staffordshire, United Kingdom, to Molson Coors Europe s.r.o., whose registered office is at Nádražni 84, Postal Code 150 54, Prague 5, Czech Republic, Identification Number: 289 85 630 registered in the Commercial Registry maintained by the Municipal Court in Prague, Section C, Insert 157920, on the terms and conditions set out in the Second Letter dated [         ], of which the above is a copy.








Date:        5.9.2014 


Place:        Burton 


Name:        David Heede


Address:    Weaver View, Bentley Fold, Ellastone


Date of Birth:      1.5.1961


Signature:    /s/ David Heede
Exhibit 32.1 Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350) In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2016 (the Report) of GSV Capital Corp. (the Registrant), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Michael T. Moe, the Chief Executive Officer of the Registrant, hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge, that: (1)

          The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and (2)

          The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant. /s/ Michael T. MoeName: Michael T. Moe Date:  August 9, 2016
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IRCUIT R ULE 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IRCUIT R ULE 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

____________________ No. 97-30812 Summary Calendar

____________________
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v. JAMES A NORRIS, JR, Defendant-Appellant.

_________________________________________________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana

(97-CR-30007-1)

_________________________________________________________________ June 9, 1998 Before KING, HIGGINBOTHAM, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Defendant-appellant James A. Norris, Jr. appeals the district court’s denial of his motion to dismiss his indictment for perjury pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1623. The indictment alleged that, on four separate occasions, Norris lied under oath when he told the bankruptcy court that he burned United States currency in the amount of $500,000. He argues that this prosecution2

violates the Double Jeopardy Clause of the Constitution because he had already been punished for his alleged misrepresentations by being imprisoned pursuant to a civil contempt order. The Double Jeopardy Clause protects against only successive criminal prosecutions for the same offense. See Hudson v. United States , 118 S. Ct. 488, 493 (1997). Double jeopardy does not bar Norris’s prosecution for perjury because his imprisonment pursuant to the civil contempt order did not amount to a criminal penalty. See id. ; cf. Norris v. Johnson (In re Norris) , No. 96- 30146, at 24 (5th Cir. Apr. 11, 1997) (unpublished) (rejecting Norris’s argument on appeal of the bankruptcy court proceeding that the civil contempt order was really criminal). AFFIRMED.