July 6, 2015

Exemption No. 11982

Regulatory Docket No. FAA–2015–1378

Mr. Sam Crimm II

President

Middle Tennessee Aerial Photography

306 East Lauderdale Street

Tullahoma, TN 37388

Dear Mr. Crimm:

This letter is to inform you that we have granted your request for exemption. It transmits our 

decision, explains its basis, and gives you the conditions and limitations of the exemption, 

including the date it ends.

By letter dated April 29, 2015, you petitioned the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) on 

behalf of Middle Tennessee Aerial Photography (hereinafter petitioner or operator) for an 

exemption. The petitioner requested to operate an unmanned aircraft system (UAS) to 

conduct aerial photography and videography.

See Appendix A for the petition submitted to the FAA describing the proposed operations and 

the regulations that the petitioner seeks an exemption.

The FAA has determined that good cause exists for not publishing a summary of the petition 

in the Federal Register because the requested exemption would not set a precedent, and any 

delay in acting on this petition would be detrimental to the petitioner.

Airworthiness Certification

The UAS proposed by the petitioner is a DJI Inspire 1.

The petitioner requested relief from 14 CFR part 21, Certification procedures for products 

and parts, Subpart H—Airworthiness Certificates. In accordance with the statutory criteria 

provided in Section 333 of Public Law 112−95 in reference to 49 U.S.C. § 44704, and in 
2

consideration of the size, weight, speed, and limited operating area associated with the 

aircraft and its operation, the Secretary of Transportation has determined that this aircraft 

meets the conditions of Section 333. Therefore, the FAA finds that the requested relief from 

14 CFR part 21, Certification procedures for products and parts, Subpart H—Airworthiness 

Certificates, and any associated noise certification and testing requirements of part 36, is 

not necessary.

The Basis for Our Decision

You have requested to use a UAS for aerial data collection1. The FAA has issued grants of 

exemption in circumstances similar in all material respects to those presented in your petition. 

In Grants of Exemption Nos. 11062 to Astraeus Aerial (see Docket No. FAA−2014−0352), 

11109 to Clayco, Inc. (see Docket No. FAA−2014−0507), 11112 to VDOS Global, LLC (see

Docket No. FAA−2014−0382), and 11213 to Aeryon Labs, Inc. (see Docket No. 

FAA−2014−0642), the FAA found that the enhanced safety achieved using an unmanned 

aircraft (UA) with the specifications described by the petitioner and carrying no passengers or 

crew, rather than a manned aircraft of significantly greater proportions, carrying crew in 

addition to flammable fuel, gives the FAA good cause to find that the UAS operation enabled 

by this exemption is in the public interest.

Having reviewed your reasons for requesting an exemption, I find that—

 They are similar in all material respects to relief previously requested in Grant of 

Exemption Nos. 11062, 11109, 11112, and 11213;

 The reasons stated by the FAA for granting Exemption Nos. 11062, 11109, 11112, and 

11213 also apply to the situation you present; and 

 A grant of exemption is in the public interest.

Our Decision

In consideration of the foregoing, I find that a grant of exemption is in the public interest. 

Therefore, pursuant to the authority contained in 49 U.S.C. 106(f), 40113, and 44701, 

delegated to me by the Administrator, Middle Tennessee Aerial Photography is granted an 

exemption from 14 CFR §§ 61.23(a) and (c), 61.101(e)(4) and (5), 61.113(a), 61.315(a), 

91.7(a), 91.119(c), 91.121, 91.151(a)(1), 91.405(a), 91.407(a)(1), 91.409(a)(1) and (2), and 

91.417(a) and (b), to the extent necessary to allow the petitioner to operate a UAS to perform 

aerial data collection. This exemption is subject to the conditions and limitations listed 

below.

 

1 Aerial data collection includes any remote sensing and measuring by an instrument(s) aboard the UA. 

Examples include imagery (photography, video, infrared, etc.), electronic measurement (precision surveying, RF 

analysis, etc.), chemical measurement (particulate measurement, etc.), or any other gathering of data by 

instruments aboard the UA.
3

Conditions and Limitations

In this grant of exemption, Middle Tennessee Aerial Photography is hereafter referred to as 

the operator.

Failure to comply with any of the conditions and limitations of this grant of exemption will be 

grounds for the immediate suspension or rescission of this exemption.

1. Operations authorized by this grant of exemption are limited to the DJI Inspire 1 when 

weighing less than 55 pounds including payload. Proposed operations of any other 

aircraft will require a new petition or a petition to amend this exemption.

2. Operations for the purpose of closed-set motion picture and television filming are 

not permitted. 

3. The UA may not be operated at a speed exceeding 87 knots (100 miles per hour). The 

exemption holder may use either groundspeed or calibrated airspeed to determine 

compliance with the 87 knot speed restriction. In no case will the UA be operated at 

airspeeds greater than the maximum UA operating airspeed recommended by the 

aircraft manufacturer.

4. The UA must be operated at an altitude of no more than 400 feet above ground level 

(AGL). Altitude must be reported in feet AGL.

5. The UA must be operated within visual line of sight (VLOS) of the PIC at all times. 

This requires the PIC to be able to use human vision unaided by any device other than 

corrective lenses, as specified on the PIC’s FAA-issued airman medical certificate or 

U.S. driver’s license.

6. All operations must utilize a visual observer (VO). The UA must be operated within 

the visual line of sight (VLOS) of the PIC and VO at all times. The VO may be used 

to satisfy the VLOS requirement as long as the PIC always maintains VLOS 

capability. The VO and PIC must be able to communicate verbally at all times; 

electronic messaging or texting is not permitted during flight operations. The PIC 

must be designated before the flight and cannot transfer his or her designation for the 

duration of the flight. The PIC must ensure that the VO can perform the duties 

required of the VO.

7. This exemption and all documents needed to operate the UAS and conduct its 

operations in accordance with the conditions and limitations stated in this grant of 

exemption, are hereinafter referred to as the operating documents. The operating 

documents must be accessible during UAS operations and made available to the 

Administrator upon request. If a discrepancy exists between the conditions and 

limitations in this exemption and the procedures outlined in the operating documents, 
4

the conditions and limitations herein take precedence and must be followed. 

Otherwise, the operator must follow the procedures as outlined in its operating 

documents. The operator may update or revise its operating documents. It is the 

operator’s responsibility to track such revisions and present updated and revised 

documents to the Administrator or any law enforcement official upon request. The 

operator must also present updated and revised documents if it petitions for extension 

or amendment to this grant of exemption. If the operator determines that any update 

or revision would affect the basis upon which the FAA granted this exemption, then 

the operator must petition for an amendment to its grant of exemption. The FAA’s 

UAS Integration Office (AFS−80) may be contacted if questions arise regarding 

updates or revisions to the operating documents.

8. Any UAS that has undergone maintenance or alterations that affect the UAS operation 

or flight characteristics, e.g., replacement of a flight critical component, must undergo 

a functional test flight prior to conducting further operations under this exemption. 

Functional test flights may only be conducted by a PIC with a VO and must remain at 

least 500 feet from other people. The functional test flight must be conducted in such 

a manner so as to not pose an undue hazard to persons and property.

9. The operator is responsible for maintaining and inspecting the UAS to ensure that it is 

in a condition for safe operation.

10. Prior to each flight, the PIC must conduct a pre-flight inspection and determine the 

UAS is in a condition for safe flight. The pre-flight inspection must account for all 

potential discrepancies, e.g., inoperable components, items, or equipment. If the 

inspection reveals a condition that affects the safe operation of the UAS, the aircraft is 

prohibited from operating until the necessary maintenance has been performed and the 

UAS is found to be in a condition for safe flight.

11. The operator must follow the UAS manufacturer’s maintenance, overhaul, 

replacement, inspection, and life limit requirements for the aircraft and 

aircraft components.

12. Each UAS operated under this exemption must comply with all manufacturer 

safety bulletins.

13. Under this grant of exemption, a PIC must hold either an airline transport, 

commercial, private, recreational, or sport pilot certificate. The PIC must also hold a 

current FAA airman medical certificate or a valid U.S. driver’s license issued by a 

state, the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, a territory, a possession, or the Federal 

government. The PIC must also meet the flight review requirements specified in 

14 CFR § 61.56 in an aircraft in which the PIC is rated on his or her pilot certificate.
5

14. The operator may not permit any PIC to operate unless the PIC demonstrates the 

ability to safely operate the UAS in a manner consistent with how the UAS will be 

operated under this exemption, including evasive and emergency maneuvers and 

maintaining appropriate distances from persons, vessels, vehicles and structures. PIC 

qualification flight hours and currency must be logged in a manner consistent with 

14 CFR § 61.51(b). Flights for the purposes of training the operator’s PICs and VOs 

(training, proficiency, and experience-building) and determining the PIC’s ability to 

safely operate the UAS in a manner consistent with how the UAS will be operated 

under this exemption are permitted under the terms of this exemption. However, 

training operations may only be conducted during dedicated training sessions. During 

training, proficiency, and experience-building flights, all persons not essential for 

flight operations are considered nonparticipants, and the PIC must operate the UA 

with appropriate distance from nonparticipants in accordance with 14 CFR § 91.119.

15. UAS operations may not be conducted during night, as defined in 14 CFR § 1.1. All 

operations must be conducted under visual meteorological conditions (VMC). Flights 

under special visual flight rules (SVFR) are not authorized.

16. The UA may not operate within 5 nautical miles of an airport reference point (ARP) as 

denoted in the current FAA Airport/Facility Directory (AFD) or for airports not 

denoted with an ARP, the center of the airport symbol as denoted on the current 

FAA-published aeronautical chart, unless a letter of agreement with that airport’s 

management is obtained or otherwise permitted by a COA issued to the exemption 

holder. The letter of agreement with the airport management must be made available 

to the Administrator or any law enforcement official upon request.

17. The UA may not be operated less than 500 feet below or less than 2,000 feet 

horizontally from a cloud or when visibility is less than 3 statute miles from the PIC.

18. If the UAS loses communications or loses its GPS signal, the UA must return to a 

pre-determined location within the private or controlled-access property.

19. The PIC must abort the flight in the event of unpredicted obstacles or emergencies.

20. The PIC is prohibited from beginning a flight unless (considering wind and forecast 

weather conditions) there is enough available power for the UA to conduct the 

intended operation and to operate after that for at least five minutes or with the reserve 

power recommended by the manufacturer if greater.

21. Air Traffic Organization (ATO) Certificate of Waiver or Authorization (COA). All 

operations shall be conducted in accordance with an ATO-issued COA. The 

exemption holder may apply for a new or amended COA if it intends to conduct 

operations that cannot be conducted under the terms of the attached COA.
6

22. All aircraft operated in accordance with this exemption must be identified by serial 

number, registered in accordance with 14 CFR part 47, and have identification 

(N−Number) markings in accordance with 14 CFR part 45, Subpart C. Markings must 

be as large as practicable.

23. Documents used by the operator to ensure the safe operation and flight of the UAS and 

any documents required under 14 CFR §§ 91.9 and 91.203 must be available to the 

PIC at the Ground Control Station of the UAS any time the aircraft is operating. 

These documents must be made available to the Administrator or any law enforcement 

official upon request.

24. The UA must remain clear and give way to all manned aviation operations and 

activities at all times. 

25. The UAS may not be operated by the PIC from any moving device or vehicle. 

26. All Flight operations must be conducted at least 500 feet from all nonparticipating 

persons, vessels, vehicles, and structures unless:

a. Barriers or structures are present that sufficiently protect nonparticipating persons 

from the UA and/or debris in the event of an accident. The operator must ensure 

that nonparticipating persons remain under such protection. If a situation arises 

where nonparticipating persons leave such protection and are within 500 feet of 

the UA, flight operations must cease immediately in a manner ensuring the safety 

of nonparticipating persons; and

b. The owner/controller of any vessels, vehicles or structures has granted permission 

for operating closer to those objects and the PIC has made a safety assessment of 

the risk of operating closer to those objects and determined that it does not 

present an undue hazard.

The PIC, VO, operator trainees or essential persons are not considered 

nonparticipating persons under this exemption.

27. All operations shall be conducted over private or controlled-access property with 

permission from the property owner/controller or authorized representative. 

Permission from property owner/controller or authorized representative will be 

obtained for each flight to be conducted.

28. Any incident, accident, or flight operation that transgresses the lateral or vertical 

boundaries of the operational area as defined by the applicable COA must be reported 

to the FAA's UAS Integration Office (AFS−80) within 24 hours. Accidents must be 

reported to the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) per instructions 

contained on the NTSB Web site: www.ntsb.gov.
7

If this exemption permits operations for the purpose of closed-set motion picture and 

television filming and production, the following additional conditions and limitations apply.

29. The operator must have a motion picture and television operations manual (MPTOM) 

as documented in this grant of exemption.

30. At least 3 days before aerial filming, the operator of the UAS affected by this 

exemption must submit a written Plan of Activities to the local Flight Standards 

District Office (FSDO) with jurisdiction over the area of proposed filming. The 3-day 

notification may be waived with the concurrence of the FSDO. The plan of activities 

must include at least the following:

a. Dates and times for all flights;

b. Name and phone number of the operator for the UAS aerial filming conducted 

under this grant of exemption;

c. Name and phone number of the person responsible for the on-scene operation of 

the UAS;

d. Make, model, and serial or N−Number of UAS to be used;

e. Name and certificate number of UAS PICs involved in the aerial filming;

f. A statement that the operator has obtained permission from property owners 

and/or local officials to conduct the filming production event; the list of those 

who gave permission must be made available to the inspector upon request;

g. Signature of exemption holder or representative; and

h. A description of the flight activity, including maps or diagrams of any area, city, 

town, county, and/or state over which filming will be conducted and the altitudes 

essential to accomplish the operation.

31. Flight operations may be conducted closer than 500 feet from participating persons 

consenting to be involved and necessary for the filming production, as specified in the 

exemption holder’s MPTOM.

Unless otherwise specified in this grant of exemption, the UAS, the UAS PIC, and the UAS 

operations must comply with all applicable parts of 14 CFR including, but not limited to, 

parts 45, 47, 61, and 91.
8

This exemption terminates on July 31, 2017, unless sooner superseded or rescinded.

Sincerely,

John S. Duncan

Director, Flight Standards Service

Enclosures
Date: April 29, 2015 

U. S . Department of Transportation 

Docket Management System 

1200 New Jersey Ave., 

S E Washington , DC 20590 _ 

Sam Crimm II- President 

Middle Tennessee Aerial Photography 

306 East Lauderdale Street 

Tullahoma,Tn 37388 

931-580-9677 

- ,. 

- .. ~ ... ! -- . ~ ; i: ! 3 

RE: Petition of Middle Tennessee Aerial Photography for Exemption Pursuant to section 333. 

of the FAA Reform Act 

Attn: To whom it may concern 

Pursuant to Section 333 of the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012 (the Reform Act) and 

14 C.F.R. Part 11, Middle Tennessee Aerial Photography, operator of Small Unmanned Aircraft 

Systems (sUASs) equipped to conduct aerial photography and videography, hereby applies for 

an exemption from the listed Federal Aviation Regulations ("FARs") to allow commercial 

operation of its sUASs, so long as such operations are conducted within and under the 

conditions outlined herein or as may be established by the FAA as required by Section 333.1 

Middle Tennessee Aerial Photography has been in business since 2006 and Sam Crimm II is a 

license commercial pilot with over 5300 hours,a pilot for 45 years. In recent history we have 

been bidding on jobs that have been bid by drone operators in our area and we find it difficult to 

compete with them. Therefore, we would like to add drone aircraft to our feet. Additionally we 

have a long history of radio control aircraft operation. All of our drone operators will be rated 

pilots. As described more fully below, the requested exemption would permit the operation of 

small, unmanned and relatively inexpensive sUAS under controlled conditions in airspace that is 

1. limited 2. predetermined and 3. controlled. The proposed exemption, if granted, would 

allow Middle Tennessee Aerial Photography to conduct commercial operations of small, 

unmanned aircraft systems ("UAS") meeting or exceeding all of the operational and 

safety requirements Congress has set forth in Section 333. 
Page 2 

Middle Tennessee Aerial Photography is a media/technology company that plans to exploit the 

capabilities of Unmanned Aerial Systems to offer a multitude of services, including: 

- Aerial surveying 

- Remote sensing 

- Agricultural support 

Real Estate Photography 

- Aerial film making and photography 

- Construction site inspections and monitoring 

Wildlife and forestry monitoring 

- Educational and research operations 

Statutory Authority Section 333, titled "Special Rules for Certain Unmanned Aircraft 

Systems", provides a mechanism for seeking expedited FAA authorization of safe civil 

UAS operations in the NAS. Section 333(a) states that the FAA "shall determine if 

certain unmanned aircraft systems may operate safely in the national airspace system 

before completion of the (comprehensive) plan and rule making required by section 

332(b)(1) of this Act or the guidance required by section 334 of this Act." In Section 

332(b)(1 ), Congress made it clear that Section 333 provides a mechanism for "expedited 

operation authorization" if several factors are met. Petitioner meets all requirements to 

permit FAA approval of commercial UAS operations. 

The Petitioner Requests Relief From the Following: 

Regulations from which the exemption is requested: 

14 C.F.R. Part 21 

14 C.F.R. 45.23 (b) 

14 C.F.R. 61.113(a) and (b) 

14 C.F.R. 91.7 (a) 

14 C.F.R. 91.9 (b) (2) 

14 C.F.R. 91.109 

14 C.F.R. 91.119 

14 C.F.R. 91.121 

14 C.F.R. 91.151(a) 

14 C.F.R. 91.203 (a) & (b) 

14 C.F.R. 91.205 (b) 

14 C.F.R. 91.215 

14C.F.R. (91.401-91.417) 
Page 3 

Unmanned Aircraft System 

sUAVs are oftentimes seen as superior to helicopters due to the smaller devices cheaper 

equipment and personnel cost, reduced noise and as such, a much smaller environmental 

impact which promotes public safety. · 

We are petitioning for exemption to enable Middle Tennessee Aerial Photography to operate a OJI 

Inspire 1 equipped with a three-axis gimbals and using High-Def cameras. This sUAV has a 

built-in capability to limit the height it flies above the ground, to limit the radius of the distance it 

flies from the operator and to exclude it from Class 8, C and D airspace including a no-fly zone 

feature. The Inspire 1 also has the fail safe function of the Naza-M autopilot system which 

means when the communication between the Main Controller and the transmitter is 

disconnected, the outputs of all command sticks from controller will go to the center position. If 

the GPS signal is good enough, the system will automatically trigger Return to Home and will 

land safely. 

The above specifications meet with the Model Aircraft Operating Standards as set 

below: 

• Middle Tennessee Aerial Photography will only operate its sUAS in line of sight of a pilot and/or 

observer and will operate at sites that are a 'sufficient distance' from populated areas within the 

sterile area described in the FOPM. Such operations will insure that the sUAS will "not create a 

hazard to users of the national airspace system or the public." 

• When flying sUAV within 5 miles of an airport, airport operators will be notified and the 

operator will give the right of way to avoid flying in the proximity of full-scale aircraft. 

• Maximum flight time for each operational flight will be 20 minutes. 

· Flights will be terminated at 25% battery power reserve should that occur prior to the 

20 minute limit. 

· The sUAV will be programmed so that it will not be operated at an altitude of no more 

than 400 feet AGL, and not more than 200 feet above an elevated platform from 

which filming is planned. 

· Minimum crew for each operation will consist of the sUAS Pilot, and Visual Observer. 

· The sUAS operated by the petitioner weighs less than 55 pounds, including the 

payload (i.e. camera, lens, and gimbal) . 

. The sUAV will operate at speeds of no more than 50 knots, can hover, and can 

simultaneously move vertically and horizontally . 

. Given the small size of the sUAS and the restricted sterile environment within which 

they will operate, our sUAS operations adhere to the Reform Act's safety 

requirements. 
Page 4 . ~·. . . . 

The UA, powered by batteries, is smaller, lighter and more maneuverable than larger aircraft 

running on combustible fuel, it operates at lower altitudes with no people on board and will 

thereby reduce current risk levels and thereby enhance safety and diminish the likelihood of 

death or serious bodily injury. With a small payload and maximum flight time of only 20 

minutes, this is offers little or no risk to national security. 

Low level oblique photos and video from several angles are far more effective than ground 

based imagery for displaying the characteristics of large, complex properties with several 

buildings· and large trees. The applicants in the past have chartered 2-seat full-sized 

helicopters for this purpose, which has proven more costly than many potential clients have 

been able to afford. The benefits of reduced cost and improved quality of presentation from 

the UA will be valuable to and benefit many buyers and sellers of real property. 

Additionally, we request that we be allowed to use our system to benefit first responders 

nearby who might require assistance, including fire fighters, the police, the sheriff, et al., 

while remaining subject to all limitations cited in this application as we do so. 

(a) No flight will be made with a Gross weight exceeding 55 pounds; 

(b)AII operations must occur in FAA Class G airspace at no more than 400 ft AGL, at 

an airspeed of no more than 25 knots and no further than 1/8th NM from the PIC; 

(c)AII operations must utilize a visual observer (VO). The VO and PIC must be able 

to communicate by voice at all times during a flight operation; 

(d)Operations will be restricted to flights over private property with the permission of the 

property owner; 

(e) All required permits will be obtained from state and local government prior to operation; 

(f) Middle Tennessee Aerial Photography, will not be operate over densely populated areas; 

(g) Middle Tennessee Aerial Photography, will not be operating over any open-air assembly of 

people; 

(h) Middle Tennessee Aerial Photography, will not be operating over heavily tracked roads; 

(i) Middle Tennessee Aerial Photography, will not be operating within 5 NM of an airport or heliport 

without prior permission. 

We respectfully request exemption under Section 333 to enable Middle Tennessee Aerial 

Photography, to operate efficient, limited, low-risk commercial sUAV operations for the activities 

stated respecting at all times the space and privacy of citizens and property whilst keeping our 

skies safe. 

Sincerely 

Sam Crimm II 

Middle Tennessee Aerial Photography 
Page 5 ... : ... 

EXEMPTION REQUESTS AND EQUIVALENT LEVEL OF SAFETY 

Middle Tennessee Aerial Photography requests an exemption from the following regulations as well as 

any . 

additional regulations that may technically apply to the operation of the sUAV System: 

14 CFR Part 21, Airworthiness Certificates 

This part establishes the procedures for the issuance of an airworthiness certificate. While the 

FAA continues to work to develop airworthiness standards for Unmanned Aerial Systems, we 

request an experimental certificate be issued for the DJI Inspire 1 under either or both of the 

following provisions: 

21.191 Experimental certificates. Experimental certificates are issued for the following purposes: 

(a) Research and development. Testing new aircraft design concepts, new aircraft equipment, 

new aircraft installations, new aircraft operating techniques, or new uses for aircraft. 

(b) Showing compliance with regulations. Conducting flight tests and other operations to 

show compliance with the airworthiness regulations including flights to show compliance for 

issuance of type and supplemental type certificates, flights to substantiate major design 

changes, and flights to show compliance with the function and reliability requirements of the 

regulations. Since the experimental certificate can be used for commercial purposes such as 

market surveys, sales demonstrations, and customer crew training, we would expect that an 

experimental certificate would permit our commercial purpose as well. The aircraft will not carry 

persons or property, will not carry fuel, and will only fly under strict operational requirements. 

Combined with the UA's light weight, being constructed primarily of carbon fiber and plastic, we 

propose that the UA will be at least as safe, if not safer, than a conventionally certificated 

aircraft performing the same mission. If an experimental airworthiness certificate is not 

appropriate for this application, then we request an exemption of 14 CFR Part 21, Subpart H. 

and the requirement for an airworthiness certificate in general. citing the equivalent level of 

safety outlined in the previous paragraph. 

14 CFR 45.23 Display of marks; general and 45.29 Size of marks. These regulations provide 

that each aircraft must display "N" and the aircraft's registration number in letters at least 3 

inches high. Additionally, the aircraft must display the word "EXPERIMENTAL" in letters at least 

2 inches high near the entrance to the cabin, cockpit, or pilot station. The sUAV does not have 

an entrance in which the word "EXPERIMENTAL" can be placed, and may not have a 

registration number assigned to it by the FAA. We propose to achieve an equivalent level of 

safety by including the word "EXPERIMENTAL" in the placard on the top of the aircraft, as 

shown above, where the PIC (Pilot In Control), VO (Visual Observer) and others in the vicinity of 

the aircraft while it is preparing for launch will be able to see the designation. Additionally, we 

feel that the permanent placard discussed in the previous paragraph will provide the aircraft's 

registration information at the ground station. Finally, we will display at the ground station a high 

contrast flag or banner that contains the words "Unmanned Aircraft Ground Station" in letters 3 

inches high or greater. Since the aircraft will operate within 3/4 NM of the ground station, the 

banner should be visible to anyone that observes the aircraft and chooses to investigate its 

point of origin. 
Page 6 

14 CFR 61.113 Private pilot privileges and ll,;i~~ti~ns~ Pilot in Command and 61.133 

Commercial pilot privileges and limitations. 

The regulation provides that no person that holds a Private Pilot certificate may act as pilot in 

Command of an aircraft for compensation or hire. Subparagraph (b) allows a private pilot to act 

as pilot in command of an aircraft in connection with any business or employment if: (1) The 

flight is only incidental to that business or employment; and (2) The aircraft does not carry 

passengers or property for compensation or hire. Our proposed operations require that the PIC 

must hold at least a Private Pilot Certificate issued by the FAA and since the aircraft cannot 

carry passengers or property, we feel we meet the intent of 61.113 Subparagraph (b) even 

though the intent of this application is to conduct a business. 

14 CFR 91.7 Prohibits the Operation of an aircraft without an airworthiness certificate. As 

no such certificate will be applicable in the form contemplated by the FARs, this Regulation is 

inapplicable. 

14 CFR 91.9 Civil aircraft flight manual, marking, and placard requirements. This regulation 

provides that no person may operate an aircraft unless a current, approved flight manual is in 

the aircraft. We assume that the intent of this requirement is to ensure that flight manual 

information is available to the aircrew while operating the aircraft. We request an exemption to 

this requirement since the aircraft is not only too small to carry documentation, the 

documentation would not be available to the crew during flight operations. To obtain an 

equivalent level of safety and meet the intent of 91.9, we propose that a current, approved sUAS 

Flight Manual must be available to the crew at the ground station anytime the aircraft is in, or 

preparing for, flight. 

14 CFR 91.109 Flight Instruction; Simulated instrument flight and certain flight tests The 

regulation states that "No person may operate a civil aircraft that is being used for flight 

instruction unless that aircraft has fully functioning dual controls." The sUAS System ground based 

control station consists of a small hand-held radio transmitter and while it does not offer a 

second set of "controls", both the student and instructor can, and will, operate the single set of 

controls simultaneously. With both student and instructor having "hands-on" the controls during 

flight, we feel that this technique meets the intent 91.109 and provides an equivalent level of 

safety. · 

91.119 Minimum safe altitudes: General. The regulation states that over sparsely populated 

areas the aircraft cannot be operated closer than 500 feet to any person, vessel, vehicle, or 

structure. Since the typical mission of the sUAS would be photography or survey of persons, 

vessels, vehicles or structures it would be necessary to operate closer than 500 feet to the items 

listed. Operations will only be flown over property or persons where permission has been 

obtained and careful pre-planned has been performed. The aircraft will be operated at a low 

altitude allowing, if a power unit fails, an emergency landing without undue hazard to persons or 

property on the surface. Therefore we maintain that due to the small size of the UAS, the hazard 

to persons, vehicles and structures is minimal compared to manned aircraft, which should be 

considered in granting the exemption. · 

CFR 91.121 Altimeter settings. The regulation requires that aircraft shall maintain cruising 

altitudes by reference to an altimeter setting available within 100 NM of the aircraft. The sUAS 

will always fly below 400 feet AGL and will not need to maintain cruising altitudes in order to 

prevent conflict with other aircraft. An Above Ground Level altimeter measurement above the 

Page 9 . 

takeoff point is transmitted via radio from the sUAS on-board computer to the d1splay screen 

held by the PIC, providing a constantly updated AGL readout. 
Page 7 

14 CFR 91.151 Fuel requirements for flight in VFR conditions. 

The regulation provides that no person may begin a flight in an airplane under day-VFR 

conditions unless there is enough fuel to fly to the first point of intended landing and to fly after 

that for at least 30 minutes. We feel the intention of this paragraph is to provide an energy 

reserve as a safety buffer for delays to landing. The sUAV is battery operated and the maximum 

duration of flight from a single battery charge is 18 minutes with a 20% reserve. Since the 

aircraft will never fly more than 1/8 NM from the point of intended landing, a full battery charge 

at launch will ensure that we meet the reserve energy requirement of this paragraph. We request 

an exemption to the word "fuel" and ask for an equivalent interpretation with the word 

"energy". 

14 CFR 91.203(a) & (b) Civil aircraft: Certifications required. 

The regulation provides that an airworthiness certificate, with the registration number assigned 

to the aircraft and a registration certificate must be aboard the aircraft. Additionally, 

subparagraph (b) provides that the airworthiness certificate be "displayed at the cabin or cockpit 

entrance so that it is legible to passengers or crew." At a maximum gross weight of 5.3 pounds, 

the sUAS is too small to carry documentation, does not have an entrance, and is not capable of 

carrying passengers or crew. To obtain an equivalent level of safety and· meet the intent of 

91.203, we propose that documents deemed appropriate for this aircraft by the FAA will be colocated 

with the crew at the ground control station and available for inspection upon request. In 

order to identify the aircraft, we propose that the information found on airworthiness and 

registration certificates be permanently affixed to the aircraft via placard containing the following 

information plus the word "EXPERIMENTAL" to satisfy the requirement of 14 CFR 45.23. 

14 CFR Subpart E (91.401- 91.417)- Maintenance, Preventive Maintenance, Alterations The 

regulation provides that the operator is primarily responsible for maintaining the aircraft in an 

airworthy condition, including compliance with part 39 and 43. Paragraphs 91.407 and 91.409 

require that the aircraft be "approved for return to service by a person authorized under 43. 7" 

after maintenance and inspection. It is our intention that the PIC perform maintenance and 

inspection of the aircraft and "be authorized to approve the aircraft for return to service." The 

Page 10 

PIC will ensure that the aircraft is in an airworthy condition prior to every flight and in addition 

conduct detailed inspections after every two hours of flight. Maintenance performed by the PIC 

is limited to repairing small cracks, replacing a propeller, checking electrical connections and 

updating software and firmware for the on-board computer. All other maintenance will be 

performed by the manufacturer or their designated repair facility. The PIC will document work 

performed in accordance with 91.417. We feel that due to the size, construction, and simplicity 

of the aircraft, the PIC can ensure an equivalent level of safety. 
Page 8 

Safety and Benefits of the UAS 

Middle Tennessee Aerial Photography will be using the UAS in a variety of applications that generally 

require 

expensive full-size manned aircraft to complete. Small, light, unmanned aerial vehicles offer 

myriad benefits over the use of full-sized manned aircraft for electric power line inspection, 

oil/gas pipeline inspection, advanced agriculture, film and still photography, just to name a few. 

Replacing significantly larger manned aircraft carrying crew and flammable fuel with small UAS 

carrying no passengers or crew creates a much greater margin of safety for the pilots and crew. 

By granting Toledo Middle Tennessee Aerial Photography's requested exemptions, the FAA will help 

drive 

development of safe and successful commercial UAS operations and will advance the public 

knowledge base for such operations. Middle Tennessee Aerial Photography is committed to promoting 

the UAS research efforts of policymakers including the FAA, NASA, DOD and DARPA by sharing 

data from its commercial UAS operations and serving as a resource for future UAS research 

operations. Thus, the FAA has good cause to grant this Petition. 

Conclusion 

As pointed out in this application, all the SUAs which our company would use, under 

authorization by the US DOT-FAA, are small, light-weight devices operated within the line of 

sight of the Pilot-in-Command (PIC), less than 400 feet above the ground and outside 5 miles 

from any airport, heliport, seaplane base, spaceport, or other location with aviation activities, 

unless the air traffic control authorities (ATC) have been notified and have authorized each flight 

within a radius of this distance. 

Page II 

All our SUAs have proven capability for controlled flight. They are devices offered for general 

sale on the market around the world and have often been used as Model Aircraft in the USA. 

We a re certain that the studies conducted until now by the FAA, about Section 332, Public Law 

112 -95, 2014, have already provided you with the assurances on the airworthiness of SUAs 

such as ours. 

For the foregoing reasons, the exemptions requested herein should be granted and Aerial 

Associates Photography should be permitted to conduct small UAS operations in accordance 

with its manuals and all other operating parameters deemed necessary and appropriate by the 

FAA. The submission of this application and its contents is the best demonstration that indeed it 

is possible to pursue the authorization proc.ess so that some SUAs may be used for legitimate 

commercial activities and under reasonably safe conditions.