45196 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 173 / Thursday, September 6, 2018 / Rules and Regulations 

health or environmental effects, using 

practicable and legally permissible 

methods, under Executive Order 12898 

(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994). 

In addition, the SIP is not approved 

to apply on any Indian reservation land 

or in any other area where EPA or an 

Indian tribe has demonstrated that a 

tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of 

Indian country, the rule does not have 

tribal implications and will not impose 

substantial direct costs on tribal 

governments or preempt tribal law as 

specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 

FR 67249, November 9, 2000). 

The Congressional Review Act, 5 

U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small 

Business Regulatory Enforcement 

Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides 

that before a rule may take effect, the 

agency promulgating the rule must 

submit a rule report, which includes a 

copy of the rule, to each House of the 

Congress and to the Comptroller General 

of the United States. EPA will submit a 

report containing this action and other 

required information to the U.S. Senate, 

the U.S. House of Representatives, and 

the Comptroller General of the United 

States prior to publication of the rule in 

the Federal Register. A major rule 

cannot take effect until 60 days after it 

is published in the Federal Register. 

This action is not a ‘‘major rule’’ as 

defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2). 

Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean 

Air Act, petitions for judicial review of 

this action must be filed in the United 

States Court of Appeals for the 

appropriate circuit by November 5, 

2018. Filing a petition for 

reconsideration by the Administrator of 

this final rule does not affect the finality 

of this action for the purposes of judicial 

review nor does it extend the time 

within which a petition for judicial 

review may be filed, and shall not 

postpone the effectiveness of such rule 

or action. This action may not be 

challenged later in proceedings to 

enforce its requirements. (See section 

307(b)(2).) 

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52 

Environmental protection, Air 

pollution control, Carbon monoxide, 

Incorporation by reference, 

Intergovernmental relations, Lead, 

Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone, Particulate 

matter, Reporting and recordkeeping 

requirements, Sulfur oxides, Volatile 

organic compounds. 

Dated: August 31, 2018. 

Alexandra Dunn, 

Regional Administrator, EPA Region 1. 

Part 52 of chapter I, title 40 of the 

Code of Federal Regulations is amended 

as follows: 

PART 52—APPROVAL AND 

PROMULGATION OF 

IMPLEMENTATION PLANS 

■ 1. The authority citation for part 52 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq. 

Subpart UU—Vermont 

■ 2. Section 52.2370 is amended in 

paragraph (e) table by adding the entry 

‘‘Submittals to meet Section 110(a)(2) 

Infrastructure Requirements for the 2012 

PM2.5 NAAQS’’ after the entry ‘‘Vermont 

Regional Haze Five-Year Progress 

Report’’ to read as follows: 

§ 52.2370 Identification of plan. 

* * * * * 

(e) * * * 

VERMONT NON-REGULATORY

Name of nonregulatory 

SIP provision 

Applicable geographic 

or nonattainment area 

State 

submittal date/ 

effective date 

EPA approval date Explanation 

*******

Submittals to meet Section 110(a)(2) Infrastructure Requirements for the 2012 

PM2.5 NAAQS.

Statewide ..................... 10/31/2015 9/6/2018, [Insert Federal Register citation].These submittals are approved with respect to 

the following CAA elements or portions thereof: 110(a)(2) (A), (B), (C), (D), (E)(1), E(2), 

(F), (G), (H), (J1), (J2), (J3), (K), (L), and (M). 

[FR Doc. 2018–19291 Filed 9–5–18; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR 

Bureau of Land Management 

43 CFR Part 8365 

[17X.LLUTW01100.L12200000.AL0000] 

Prohibition of Target Shooting on 

Public Lands in the Eastern Lake 

Mountains, Utah County, Utah 

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, 

Interior. 

ACTION: Interim final supplementary 

rule. 

SUMMARY: The Bureau of Land 

Management (BLM) Utah State Director 

hereby establishes an interim final 

supplementary rule (rule) prohibiting 

target shooting within a 2,004-acre area 

on BLM-administered public lands in 

the Eastern Lake Mountains area of the 

Salt Lake Field Office, Eastern Lake 

Mountains, Utah County, Utah. The rule 

is necessary to implement and enforce 

this long-term prohibition to provide for 

public safety and historic properties 

(specifically Native American 

petroglyphs), as authorized in the 

Decision Record for the Eastern Lake 

Mountains Target Shooting Resource 

Management Plan Amendment (RMPA). 

The rule does not restrict other public 

activities in or access to or through the 

Lake Mountains, including legal 

hunting. 

DATES: The rule is effective on 

September 6, 2018. You may submit 

comments to the BLM on or before 

November 5, 2018. 

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments 

by any of the following methods: 

Mail: Bureau of Land Management, 

Attention: Matt Preston, Salt Lake Field 

Office, 2370 South Decker Lake 

Boulevard, West Valley City, Utah 

84119. 

Email: blm_ut_sl_comments@blm.gov. 

NEPA Register: https://go.usa.gov/ 

xXBNF. 

The environmental assessment, 

Decision Record, and RMPA are 

available for public review at the 

mailing and NEPA Register website 

addresses in this section. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Matt 

Preston, BLM Salt Lake Field Manager, 

Bureau of Land Management at 801– 

977–4300. Persons who use a 

telecommunications device for the deaf 

(TDD) may call the Federal Relay 

Service (FRS) at 1–800–877–8339 to 

contact the above individual. The FRS 


daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 173 / Thursday, September 6, 2018 / Rules and Regulations 45197 

is available 24 hours a day, 7 days a 

week. You will receive a reply during 

normal business hours. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The BLM 

is establishing this rule under the 

authority of 43 Code of Federal 

Regulations (CFR) 8365.1–6, which 

allows State Directors to establish 

supplementary rules for the protection 

of persons, property, and the public 

lands and resources. This provision 

allows the BLM to issue rules of less 

than national effect by publishing the 

rule in the Federal Register, but without 

codifying it in the CFR. This rule 

applies to 2,004 acres of public lands 

managed by the BLM Salt Lake Field 

Office in the Eastern Lake Mountains 

within Utah County, Utah. 

This Notice and the map of the 

affected area can be obtained by visiting 

or contacting the Salt Lake Field Office 

(see ADDRESSES). The BLM will post this 

Notice and the map to the National 

Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) 

Register (see ADDRESSES). 

I. Public Comment Procedures 

Please submit your written comments 

on issues related to this rule to one of 

the addresses shown in the ADDRESSES

section above. Comments on the rule 

should be specific, confined to issues 

pertinent to the rule, and explain the 

reason for any recommended change. 

Comments requesting changes to the 

Decision Record, environmental 

assessment, or the RMPA are outside the 

scope of this rule. 

The BLM is not obligated to consider, 

or include in the Administrative Record 

for the rule, comments delivered to an 

address other than those listed above 

(see ADDRESSES), or comments that the 

BLM receives after the close of the 

comment period (see DATES), unless 

they are postmarked or electronically 

dated before the deadline. 

The BLM will make your comments, 

including your name and address, 

available for public review at the Salt 

Lake Field Office address listed in 

ADDRESSES above during regular 

business hours (8:00 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., 

Monday through Friday, except Federal 

holidays). Before including your 

address, phone number, email address, 

or other personally identifiable 

information in your comment, you 

should be aware that your entire 

comment—including your personally 

identifiable information—may be made 

publicly available at any time. While 

you can ask the BLM in your comment 

to withhold your personally identifiable 

information from public review, we 

cannot guarantee that we will be able to 

do so. 

II. Discussion of Interim Final 

Supplementary Rule 

The rule is necessary to implement 

and enforce the long-term target 

shooting closure authorized in the 

Decision Record for the Eastern Lake 

Mountains Target Shooting RMPA. The 

long-term closure covers 2,004 acres of 

public lands in Utah County, Utah. This 

rule replaces and expands the previous 

target shooting closure orders 

implemented by the BLM in the Eastern 

Lake Mountains since 2012 (81 FR 

90864, 79 FR 74111, 77 FR 75186). The 

expanded closure area identified in this 

supplementary rule is necessary in 

order to provide additional protection 

for public health and safety to those 

who may be endangered by target 

shooting and for protection of historic 

properties (specifically Native American 

petroglyphs) damaged by target 

shooting, outside the previous closure 

area. 

The BLM determined that a long-term 

target shooting closure was necessary 

due to a variety of concerns, including: 

Several serious public safety incidents 

of errant gunfire endangering lives and 

property, the high incidence of target 

shooting-caused wildfires annually, 

documented and irreparable damage to 

historic properties (specifically Native 

American petroglyphs), and the large 

amounts of litter and hazardous waste 

that result from target shooting. In 

addition, the area is not considered safe 

for target shooting due to the lack of 

proper backstops in lower elevations, 

nearby homes, and its proximity to State 

Highway 68. Public outreach and 

education efforts to address these 

problems have not been successful. 

The BLM has determined that this 

rule is necessary to allow immediate 

implementation of the long-term 

closure, thereby providing for public 

safety and protection of important 

historic and pre-historic properties. 

In accordance with section 553(b)(B) 

of the Administrative Procedure Act 

(APA) (5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B)), the BLM 

finds good cause that publishing a 

proposed supplementary rule, accepting 

public comment on the proposed 

supplementary rule, and then, 

publishing a final supplementary rule 

are contrary to the public interest. The 

urgency and magnitude of the need to 

reduce the risks to public safety and 

health, and historic properties 

(specifically Native American 

petroglyphs) associated with target 

shooting in the Eastern Lake Mountains 

warrants expedited action. Furthermore, 

the planning process for the Eastern 

Lake Mountains Target Shooting RMPA 

offered extensive opportunities for 

public comment, including public 

notices, an extended scoping period, an 

extended comment period, a protest 

period on the proposed land use plan 

decision, and a Governor’s consistency 

review. 

Under section 553(d)(3) of the APA (5 

U.S.C. 553(d)(3)), good cause also exists 

for making these rules effective 

immediately because a variety of 

government and public stakeholders 

have asked the BLM to take immediate 

and affirmative action to curtail the 

public safety risks and the damage to 

historic properties (specifically Native 

American petroglyphs) caused by the 

target shooting. The environmental 

assessment for the RMPA discussed the 

need to establish a supplementary rule, 

and thus, the public was on notice 

during that process that this 

supplementary rule would follow 

completion of the RMPA. A summary of 

the planning process, including public 

participation periods, is described 

below in Section III. Procedural Matters, 

National Environmental Policy Act 

(NEPA). 

The BLM invites public comment on 

this interim final supplementary rule 

until November 5, 2018. If any 

substantive comments are received in 

response to this notice, the BLM will 

determine whether or not to modify this 

rule. The BLM will publish a Notice 

establishing the final supplementary 

rule only if substantive comments are 

received. If no substantive comments 

are received, the rule will become a 

final supplementary rule without 

another published notice. 

III. Procedural Matters 

Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 

Regulatory Planning and Review 

The rule prohibits target shooting on 

a limited area of public lands in the 

Eastern Lake Mountains. The rule is not 

a significant regulatory action and is not 

subject to review by the Office of 

Management and Budget under 

Executive Order 12866 or 13563. The 

rule would not have an annual effect of 

$100 million or more on the economy; 

and it would not adversely affect in a 

material way the economy, productivity, 

competition, jobs, the environment, 

public health or safety, or state, local, or 

tribal governments, or communities. 

The rule would not create a serious 

inconsistency or otherwise interfere 

with an action taken or planned by 

another agency; and it would not 

materially alter the budgetary effects of 

entitlements, grants, user fees, or loan 

programs, or the rights or obligations of 

their recipients; nor does it raise novel 

legal or policy issues. This rule 


daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with RULES
45198 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 173 / Thursday, September 6, 2018 / Rules and Regulations 

implements and supports enforcement 

of the long-term target shooting closure 

authorized in the Decision Record for 

the Eastern Lake Mountains Target 

Shooting RMPA. 

Clarity of the Supplementary Rule 

Executive Order 12866 requires each 

agency to write regulations that are 

simple and easy to understand. The 

BLM invites your comments on how to 

make this rule easier to understand, 

including answers to questions such as 

the following: 

(1) Are the requirements in the rule 

clearly stated? 

(2) Does the rule contain technical 

language or jargon that interferes with 

its clarity? 

(3) Does the format of the rule 

(grouping and order of sections, use of 

headings, paragraphing, etc.) aid or 

reduce its clarity? 

(4) Would the rule be easier to 

understand if it was divided into more 

(but shorter) sections? 

(5) Is the description of the rule in the 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section of 

this preamble helpful in understanding 

the rule? How could this description be 

more helpful in making the rule easier 

to understand? 

Please send any comments you have 

on the clarity of the rule to one of the 

addresses specified in the ADDRESSES

section. 

National Environmental Policy Act 

(NEPA) 

The rule implements a land use plan 

decision to prohibit target shooting on 

2,004 acres to provide for public safety 

and protect historic properties 

(specifically Native American 

petroglyphs) as authorized in the 

Decision Record for the Eastern Lake 

Mountains Target Shooting RMPA 

(DOI–BLM–UT–W010–2015–0023–EA). 

The BLM analyzed and disclosed the 

environmental consequences of the 

long-term target shooting closure 

identified in an environmental 

assessment completed on December 14, 

2016. The BLM found that the long-term 

target shooting closure, including the 

rule, would not have a significant 

individual or cumulative effect on the 

quality of the human environment 

under Section 102(2) of the National 

Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 

U.S.C. 4332(2)(C)). 

The Eastern Lake Mountains Target 

Shooting RMPA was initiated under a 

Notice of Intent published in the 

Federal Register on June 12, 2015 (80 

FR 33547). A 30-day public scoping 

period began on June 12, 2015, with 

public open houses on August 4 and 5, 

2015, and was subsequently extended 

through August 20, 2015. The BLM 

released the Draft RMPA and associated 

environmental assessment for a 30-day 

public comment period beginning on 

April 15, 2016, with an open house on 

May 11, 2016; and subsequently 

extended the comment period through 

May 31, 2016. The BLM released the 

Proposed RMPA and associated 

environmental assessment for a 30-day 

public protest period and 60-day 

Governor’s consistency review on 

December 14, 2016. The BLM informed 

the public of the scoping period and 

associated open houses, comment 

period and associated open house, and 

the protest period through news 

releases, NEPA register postings, BLM 

website postings, flyers on local bulletin 

boards, and public mailings to a project 

mailing list of more than 300 addresses. 

The environmental assessment, 

Decision Record, and RMPA are 

available for public review at the 

locations identified in the ADDRESSES

section. 

Regulatory Flexibility Act 

Congress enacted the Regulatory 

Flexibility Act (RFA) of 1980, as 

amended (5 U.S.C. 601–612) to ensure 

that Government regulations do not 

unnecessarily or disproportionately 

burden small entities. The RFA requires 

a regulatory flexibility analysis if a rule 

would have a significant economic 

impact, either detrimental or beneficial, 

on a substantial number of small 

entities. This rule does not pertain 

specifically to commercial or 

governmental entities of any size, but to 

public recreational use of specific 

public lands. This rule establishes a rule 

of conduct for recreational use of certain 

public lands in the Eastern Lake 

Mountains. Therefore, the BLM has 

determined, under the RFA, that this 

rule would not have a significant 

economic impact on a substantial 

number of small entities. 

Small Business Regulatory Enforcement 

Fairness Act 

This rule does not constitute a ‘‘major 

rule’’ as defined at 5 U.S.C 804(2). This 

rule establishes a rule of conduct for 

recreational use of certain public lands 

in the Eastern Lake Mountains and 

would not affect business, commercial, 

or industrial use of the public lands. 

Unfunded Mandates Reform Act 

This rule would not impose an 

unfunded mandate on state, local, or 

tribal governments or the private sector, 

of more than $100 million per year; nor 

would it have a significant or unique 

effect on small governments. This rule 

would have no effect on governmental 

or tribal entities and would impose no 

requirements on any of these entities. 

This rule establishes a rule of conduct 

for recreational use of certain public 

lands in the Eastern Lake Mountains 

and does not affect business, 

commercial, or industrial use of these 

public lands. Therefore, the BLM is not 

required to prepare a statement 

containing the information required by 

the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act (2 

U.S.C. 1531 et seq.). 

Executive Order 12630, Governmental 

Actions and Interference With 

Constitutionally Protected Property 

Rights (Takings) 

This rule does not represent a 

Government action capable of 

interfering with constitutionally 

protected property rights. This rule does 

not address property rights in any form 

and does not cause the impairment of 

anyone’s property rights. This rule 

establishes a rule of conduct for 

recreational use of certain public lands 

in the Eastern Lake Mountains. 

Therefore, the BLM has determined that 

this rule would not cause a ‘‘taking’’ of 

private property or require preparation 

of a takings assessment under this 

Executive Order. 

Executive Order 13132, Federalism 

This rule would not have a substantial 

direct effect on the States, on the 

relationship between the Federal 

Government and the States, or on the 

distribution of power and 

responsibilities among the various 

levels of government. This rule applies 

to a limited area of land in only one 

State, Utah, and would not conflict with 

any Utah state statute or regulation. 

Therefore, in accordance with Executive 

Order 13132, the BLM has determined 

that this rule does not have sufficient 

Federalism implications to warrant 

preparation of a Federalism Assessment. 

Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice 

Reform 

Under Executive Order 12988, the 

BLM has determined that this rule 

would not unduly burden the judicial 

system and that it meets the 

requirements of sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) 

of the Order. 

Executive Order 13175, Consultation 

and Coordination With Indian Tribal 

Governments 

In accordance with Executive Order 

13175, the BLM consulted and 

coordinated with Indian tribal 

governments on this rule during the 

development of the Eastern Lake 

Mountains Target Shooting RMPA, 

which included an implementationVerDate Sep<11>2014 15:59 Sep 05, 2018 Jkt 244001 PO 00000 Frm 00006 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\06SER1.SGM 06SER1

daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 173 / Thursday, September 6, 2018 / Rules and Regulations 45199 

level decision to establish this interim 

final supplementary rule through 

publication in the Federal Register. 

The Salt Lake Field Manager sent 

project information and invited the 

initiation of formal consultation with 

the following Native American Tribes 

via certified letter dated June 29, 2015: 

Jemez Pueblo, Skull Valley Band of 

Goshute Indians of Utah, Confederated 

Tribes of the Goshute Reservation, 

Paiute Indian Tribe, Ute Indian Tribe, 

and Eastern Shoshone. The BLM 

contacted these same tribes via phone 

between July 1 and 7, 2015, to schedule 

telephone conferences with the Salt 

Lake Field Manager, if desired. The 

Paiute Indian Tribe requested a meeting 

and a presentation was made to the 

Paiute Tribal Council on July 16, 2015, 

at which the tribe expressed their 

support for the Eastern Lake Mountains 

Target Shooting RMPA. Additionally, 

these tribes received formal invitations 

to participate in the planning process as 

a consulting party and/or cooperating 

agency; none of the tribes accepted 

either role. These same tribes were 

included on the project mailing list and 

received notification of the scoping 

period and associated open houses, the 

public comment period and associated 

open house, and the protest period. 

Only the Paiute Indian Tribe of Utah 

submitted a comment letter during the 

public comment period expressing 

concern over preserving and protecting 

Native American petroglyphs. To 

discuss this in detail with the tribe, the 

BLM attended a Paiute Tribal Council 

meeting on November 1, 2016, in which 

the tribal leaders expressed their 

support for the Proposed RMPA. 

The Salt Lake Field Manager and staff 

also attended the November 15, 2016 

Utah Tribal Leaders Conference in 

Wendover, Nevada, at which time tribal 

leaders of the Confederated Tribes of the 

Goshute Reservation, Paiute, Ute, and 

Eastern Shoshone were informed of the 

Proposed RMPA and invited to make 

comments. Tribal leaders asked 

questions and made verbal comments in 

support of the Proposed RMPA. A final 

letter was mailed to these same tribes on 

December 14, 2016, inviting them to 

consult on the Proposed RMPA and 

associated environmental assessment. 

The BLM also contacted these tribes via 

telephone. No further comments were 

received. 

Executive Order 13352, Facilitation of 

Cooperative Conservation 

Under Executive Order 13352, the 

BLM has determined that this rule 

would not impede the facilitation of 

cooperative conservation. This rule 

would take appropriate account of and 

consider the interests of persons with 

ownership or other legally recognized 

interests in land or other natural 

resources; properly accommodate local 

participation in the Federal decisionmaking process; and provide that the 

programs, projects, and activities are 

consistent with protecting public health 

and safety. 

Executive Order 13211, Actions 

Concerning Regulations That 

Significantly Affect Energy Supply, 

Distribution, or Use 

This rule does not constitute a 

‘‘significant energy action,’’ as defined 

in Executive Order 13211. The rule 

would not have an adverse effect on 

energy supplies, production, or 

consumption and has no connection 

with energy policy. 

Paperwork Reduction Act 

This rule does not contain 

information collection requirements that 

the Office of Management and Budget 

must approve under the Paperwork 

Reduction Act of 1995, 44 U.S.C. 3501 

et seq. 

IV. Interim Final Supplementary Rule 

For the reasons stated in the 

preamble, and under the authority of 43 

CFR 8365.1–6, the State Director 

establishes a rule for 2,004 acres of 

public lands managed by the BLM in the 

Lake Mountains in Utah County, Utah, 

subject to the Pony Express Resource 

Management Plan, to read as follows: 

Prohibited Act 

Target shooting is prohibited within 

the area described below, including 

2,004 acres, in Utah County, Utah. 

Exemptions 

The following persons are exempt 

from this rule: Any Federal, state, local, 

and/or military employees acting within 

the scope of their official duties; 

members of any organized rescue or fire 

fighting force performing an official 

duty; and persons who are expressly 

authorized or approved by the BLM. 

Legal Land Description 

The legal description of the affected 

public lands is: 

Salt Lake Meridian, Utah 

T. 7 S, R. 1 E, 

Sec. 6, lot 1 and NE1⁄4SE1⁄4; 

Sec. 7, lot 1. 

T. 7 S, R. 1 W, 

Sec. 13, lots 2 thru 4, lots 9 thru 12, and 

W1⁄2; 

Sec. 22, those portions of lots 5, 11, and 

12 lying southwesterly of the top of a 

ridgeline, bears northwest and southeast, 

on the south side of Pfeiffer Canyon, the 

easterly end of the ridgeline being 

approximately 460 feet northerly of the 

south one quarter section corner of 

section 22 along the north-south 

centerline of section 22 and the westerly 

end of the ridgeline being approximately 

1,780 feet northerly of the southwest 

corner of section 22 along the section 

line between sections 21 and 22; 

Sec. 24, lots 1 thru 3, lots 10 thru 13, lots 

17 and 18, and NW1⁄4; 

Sec. 26, NW1⁄4NE1⁄4, N1⁄2NW1⁄4, and 

NW1⁄4SW1⁄4; 

Sec. 27, SW1⁄4NE1⁄4; 

Sec. 28, N1⁄2 and SE1⁄4. 

The areas described contain approximately 

2,004 acres. 

Definition 

Target shooting: The discharge or use 

of a firearm or other dangerous weapon 

(e.g. bow-and-arrows, projectile 

weapons, etc.) for the purposes of 

recreational shooting not associated 

with lawful hunting practices. 

Enforcement 

Any person who violates this rule 

may be tried before a United States 

Magistrate and fined in accordance with 

18 U.S.C. 3571, imprisoned no more 

than 12 months under 43 U.S.C. 1733(a) 

and 43 CFR 8360.0–7, or both. In 

accordance with 43 CFR 8365.1–7, State 

or local officials may also impose 

penalties for violations of Utah law. 

Edwin L. Roberson, 

State Director. 

[FR Doc. 2018–19300 Filed 9–5–18; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4310–DQ–P 

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND 

SECURITY 

Federal Emergency Management 

Agency 

44 CFR Part 64 

[Docket ID FEMA–2018–0002; Internal 

Agency Docket No. FEMA–8545] 

Suspension of Community Eligibility 

AGENCY: Federal Emergency 

Management Agency, DHS. 

ACTION: Final rule. 

SUMMARY: This rule identifies 

communities where the sale of flood 

insurance has been authorized under 

the National Flood Insurance Program 

(NFIP) that are scheduled for 

suspension on the effective dates listed 

within this rule because of 

noncompliance with the floodplain 

management requirements of the 

program. If the Federal Emergency 

Management Agency (FEMA) receives 

documentation that the community has 


daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with RULES