alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Finance and Accounting Service Providing payment services for the U.S. Department of Defense

Search
Search

Search

              - 
              - 
              - 
              - 
              - 

-  Military Member		 
-  Retired Military & Annuitant		 
-  Civilian Employee		 
-  Contractor & Vendor		 

Homedebtandclaimsnonmilitarydebts

**866-912-6488 **Mon-Fri:7:30 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. ESTContact UsPrivacy Information

askDFAS

                        - Make a Payment
                        - Installment Payments
                        - Education Debt Information                            - Types of Education Debts
                          - Student Deferment
                          More
                        - Waivers and Remissions                            - Current or Former Military
                          - Retiree
                          - Annuitants
                          - Civilian Employees
                          - Former Spouse
                          - Completing Your Application
                          - Finance Officials - Waivers
                          - Finance Officials - Remissions
                          More
                        - Check Payment Status
                        - Update Mailing Address
                        - Travel Advance Debts
                        - Protesting Your Debt                            - Base Level Debt
                          - Non Base Level
                          More
                        - Payment in Arrears                            - Submitting a Claim
                          - Disability Severance Tax Refunds
                          More
                        - Correction of Records
                        - Bankruptcy
                        - Failure to Pay a Debt
                        - Frequently Asked Questions

### Stay Connected

Department of Defense     Department of Veterans Affairs     Military Employment Verification     Warrior Care Website     Defense Contract Mgmt Agency  DoD Forms     Department of State     Civilian Personnel Mgmt Service     DTS Travel Center     System for Award Mgmt (SAM)    Congressional/LegislationPersonnel Force Innovation     Freedom of Information Act     DFAS Hotline   Contact Us    DoD Accessibility / Section 508   DFAS Section 508 Instruction  EEO / No Fear Act  

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil
Exhibit 32.1   CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Quarterly Report of Exclusive Building Services, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Qfor the period ended January 31, 2012 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Patricia G. Skarpa, Chief Executive and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:  1. The Report fully complies with requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.   Dated: March 13, 2012  /s/ Patricia G. Skarpa Patricia G. Skarpa Title: Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer     1
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3817 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 3817

                To amend the Fishermen's Protective Act.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 8, 1994

     Mr. Manton (for himself, Mr. Studds, and Mr. Young of Alaska) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                     Merchant Marine and Fisheries

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
                To amend the Fishermen's Protective Act.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled, That section 7 of the 
Fishermen's Protective Act of 1967 (22 U.S.C. 1977) is amended--
            (1) in subsection (c)--
                    (A) by deleting the third sentence, and
                    (B) by inserting after the first sentence--``Such 
                fees may be collected whether or not they are needed to 
                replenish the Fund.''; and
            (2) in subsection (e) by striking ``October 1, 1993'' and 
        inserting in lieu thereof ``October 1, 1996''.

                                 <all>
```
I

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 4107

To amend the Radiation Exposure Compensation Act to remove the requirement that exposure resulting in stomach cancer occur before age 30,

and for other purposes.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 22, 1994

Mrs. MINK introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee

on the Judiciary

A BILL

To amend the Radiation Exposure Compensation Act to remove the requirement that exposure resulting in stomach

cancer occur before age 30, and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. REMOVAL OF REQUIREMENT THAT EXPOSURE

4 RESULTING IN STOMACH CANCER OCCUR BE5 FORE AGE 30.

6 Section 4(b)(2) of the Radiation Exposure Com7 pensation Act (42 U.S.C. 2210 note) is amended by strik8 ing ‘‘(provided initial exposure occurred before age 30)’’.
2

•HR 4107 IH

1 SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE CLAIMS FORMERLY

2 BARRED.

3 Section 8 of the Radiation Exposure Compensation

4 Act (42 U.S.C. 2210 note) is amended—

5 (1) by inserting ‘‘(a) IN GENERAL.—’’ before

6 ‘‘A claim’’; and

7 (2) by adding at the end the following new sub8 section:

9 ‘‘(b) STOMACH CANCER CLAIMS FORMERLY

10 BARRED.—

11 ‘‘(1) EXTENSION OF TIME.—A claim by an indi12 vidual described in section 4(a)(2), who submits the

13 documentation required by such section to show that

14 the individual contracted cancer of the stomach after

15 initial exposure that occurred at or after age 30,

16 shall be barred unless filed within 20 years after the

17 date of the enactment of this subsection.

18 ‘‘(2) CLAIMS PREVIOUSLY DENIED.—An indi19 vidual may reapply for payment under this Act if the

20 individual’s claim under section 4(a)(2) was denied

21 before the date of the enactment of this subsection

22 on the grounds that the specific disease claimed by

23 the individual was cancer of the stomach and the

24 initial exposure of the individual did not occur before

25 age 30.’’.

Æ
### SAT Report PMN Number: P-12-0416 SAT Date: 7/17/2012 Print Date: 1/8/2013

Related cases :

Concern levels : Type of Concern: Health Eco Comments Level of Concern: 2 1

Persistence Bioaccum Toxicity Comments 3 31

Exposure Based Review : Health: N o Ecotox: N o
Routes of exposure : Health: Dermal Inhalation Ecotox: N o releases to water Fate: ; Keywords : Keywords: LUNG, ONCO-LUNG, UNCERT-IMMUNO/MUTA
Summary of Assessment :

Fate : Fate Summary: P-12-0416-19 FATE: Solid S < 0.001 mg/L at 25 C (E) VP < 1.0E-6 torr at 25 C (E) BP > 400 C (E) H < 1.00E-8 (E)POTW removal (%) = 0-90 via sorption Time for complete ultimate aerobic biodeg > mo Sorption to soils/sediments = low - v.strong PBT Potential: P3B3 *CEB FATE: Migration to ground water = negl – rapid

Health : Health Summary: Absorption is poor all routes based on analogs. There is concern for lung effects from lung overload and lung cancer if inhaled for poorly soluble respirable particulates and carbon nanotubes and uncertain concern for mutagenicity and immunotoxicity for nano materials. Moderate concern. Test Data: test material is P12-0417, study summaries only, study reports not available to the submitter: negative in Salmonella and E coli negative for chromosome aberrations in Chinese hamster ovary fibroblasts negative in mouse micronucleus assay, ip acute oral study in rats - no effect at 300 mg/kg’acute dermal study in rats - no effect at 2000 mg/kg 28-day oral study in rats (25, 50, 100 mg/kg) - no dose related effects, decreased hemoglobin at 25 mg/kg and decreased kidney weights at 50 mg/kg, no effect noted at 100 mg/kg 6-hr inhalation study in rats - no effect at 1 and 3 mg/m3

Ecotox :
Test Organism Test Type Test End Point Predicted Measured Comments

fish 96-h LC50 * daphnid 48-h LC50 * green algal 96-h EC50 * fish

_ chronic value * daphnid

_ chronic value *

algal

_ chronic value *

Sewage Sludge 3-h EC50

_ Sewage Sludge

_ Chronic Value _

Ecotox Values Comments: Predictions are based on SARs for nonionic polymers; SAR chemical class = p olyme r - nonionic - carbon; MW > 1,000,000; solid with mp unknown (P); S < 0.001 mg/L at 20 C (P); p H7; effective concentrations based on 100% active ingredients and mean measured concentrations; hardness <150.0 mg/L as CaCO3; and TOC <2.0 mg/L;

Factors Values Comments Assessment Factor 10Concentration of Concern ( p pb) *

SARs nonionic polymers SAR Class p olyme r -nonioinic-carbon Ecotox Category N onionic Polymers

Ecotox Factors Comments:

SAT Chair: Becky Jones
EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In  connection  with this  Amendment No. 3 to the Annual Report of Applied
Digital  Solutions,  Inc.  (the  "Company") on Form 10-K/A for the period ending
December 31, 2003 as filed with the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the
date hereof (the "Report"),  I, Evan C. McKeown,  Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (1) The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and result of  operations of the
Company.

/s/ Evan C. McKeown
-----------------------------
Evan C. McKeown
Chief Financial Officer
September 22, 2004

A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has been
provided  to Applied  Digital  Solutions,  Inc.  and will be retained by Applied
Digital Solutions,  Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or its staff upon request
```

                                  Exhibit 31.2

                            Section 302 Certification
                           of Robert A. Comey (CFO)

                                  CERTIFICATION

         I, Robert A. Comey, certify that:

1    I have reviewed  this annual  report on Form 10-K/A of MACC Private  Equities
     Inc.;

2.   Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of
     a  material  fact or omit to sate a  material  fact  necessary  to make the
     statements made, in light of the circumstances  under which such statements
     were made,  not  misleading  with  respect  to the  period  covered by this
     report;

3.   Based on my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and  other  financial
     information  included  in  this  report,  fairly  present  in all  material
     respects  the  condition,  results  of  operations  and  cash  flows of the
     registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.   The  registrant's  other  certifying  officers  and I are  responsible  for
     establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
     in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

     a)   Designed  such  disclosure  controls  and  procedures,  or caused such
          disclosure   controls  or   procedures   to  be  designed   under  our
          supervision,  to ensure  that  material  information  relating  to the
          registrant,  including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to
          us by others within those entities,  particularly during the period in
          which this report is being prepared;

     b)   Evaluated the  effectiveness of the registrant's  disclosure  controls
          and presented in this report our conclusions  about the  effectiveness
          of the controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by
          this report based on such evaluation; and

     c)   Presented in this report our conclusions  about the  effectiveness  of
          the disclosure  controls and procedures  based on our evaluation as of
          the Evaluation Date;

5.   The registrant's other certifying  officers and I have disclosed,  based on
     our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to
     the registrant's  auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of
     directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

     c)   all  significant  deficiencies  in the design or operation of internal
          control  over  financial  reporting  which  are  reasonably  likely to
          adversely  affect  the  registrant's   ability  to  record,   process,
          summarize and report financial information; and

     d)   any fraud, whether or not material,  that involves management or other
          employees who have a  significant  role in the  registrant's  internal
          controls.

Date: June 16, 2005

           /s/ Robert A. Comey
         -----------------------------------
         Robert A. Comey
         Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
```
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of Smith-Midland Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2014 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), we, Rodney I. Smith and William A. Kenter, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, respectively, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





|    |                                                                                                                      
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




|    |                                                                                                                                                     
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




/s/ Rodney I. SmithRodney I. SmithChief Executive Officer(principal executive officer)/s/ William A. KenterWilliam A. KenterChief Financial Officer(principal financial and accounting officer)Dated:January 8, 2016
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Finance and Accounting Service Providing payment services for the U.S. Department of Defense

Search
Search

Search

              - 
              - 
              - 
              - 
              - 

-  Military Member		 
-  Retired Military & Annuitant		 
-  Civilian Employee		 
-  Contractor & Vendor		 

Homefoiapublicliaison

## Freedom of Information Act (FOIA)

                          - Overview
                          - Information Required to Conduct a Search 
                          - Expedited Processing and Fees
                          - Submit a FOIA Request
                          - Frequently Asked Questions

## Privacy Act (PA)

                          - Overview
                          - Submit a Privacy Act Request 
                          - System of Records Notices (SORN)
                          - Privacy Impact Assessments (PIA)
                          - Frequently Asked Questions

## Other FOIA Information

                          - Subpoenas & Court Orders
                          - Request Records on behalf of an Individual other than Yourself
                          - State Agencies
                          - Public Liaison/Contact Us
                          - Reading Room

### FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT LIAISON

##### **If you have concerns regarding the service you received, you may contact our FOIA Public Liaison:**

Gregory L. OutlawDefense Finance and Accounting ServiceCorporate Communications – FOIA/PA8899 E. 56th StreetIndianapolis, IN 46249-0150Phone: (317) 212-4591Email:**dfas.foia@mail.mil****For assistance with FOIA and Privacy Act requests, please contact us via the methods below:**

**Email:****dfas.foia@mail.mil**  **Fax:****(317) 275-0391** **Postal Mail:**Defense Finance and Accounting ServiceCorporate Communications – FOIA/PA8899 E. 56th StreetIndianapolis, IN 46249-0150 

Page updated January 30, 2024

 

### Stay Connected

Department of Defense     Department of Veterans Affairs     Military Employment Verification     Warrior Care Website     Defense Contract Mgmt Agency  DoD Forms     Department of State     Civilian Personnel Mgmt Service     DTS Travel Center     System for Award Mgmt (SAM)    Congressional/LegislationPersonnel Force Innovation     Freedom of Information Act     DFAS Hotline   Contact Us     Accessibility / Section 508    EEO / No Fear Act  

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil
#### People v Clainto Carr, Defendant.

Motion to extend time to take appeal denied. Memorandum: There was no improper conduct by defense counsel. Counsel complied with 22 NYCRR 1022.11 (a) by giving defendant the required written notice and defendant acknowledged in writing that he “did not wish to appeal”. Present—Callahan, J. P., Doerr, Boomer, Lawton and Davis, JJ.
Exhibit  32 

SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION 

In connection with the Annual Report of SpectRx, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Mark A. Samuels, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge: 

(1)   the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange  Act of 1934; and 

(2)   the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

Date: April 27, 2007

/s/ MARK A. SAMUELS Name: Mark A. Samuels 

Title: Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 32.1

Certification of
Principal Executive OfficerPursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Bridgeway Acquisition Corp. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended
January 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Keri B.
Bosch, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements
of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

|Date: March 22, 2011 |                                                         | /s/ Keri B. Bosch
|-------------------- | ------------------------------------------------------- | -----------------
|                     | Name: Keri B. Bosch
        Principal Executive Officer
#### Schapiro & Reich, Esqs., Appellant, v Jacob D. Fuchsberg, Respondent.

Order unanimously reversed on the law without costs and motion denied. Memorandum: Supreme Court improvidently exercised its discretion in granting defendant’s motion seeking a change of venue pursuant to CPLR 510 (3) upon the ground that "the convenience of material witnesses and the ends of justice will be promoted by the change”. The affidavits offered by defendant in support of his motion were legally insufficient to support the change of venue from Suffolk County to Westchester County. There is no showing that venue in Suffolk County would cause inconvenience to nonparty material witnesses and the convenience of the parties is not relevant unless the inconvenience relates to a party’s health, a situation not argued here *(see, DArgenio v Monroe Radiological Assocs.,*124 AD2d 541, 542; *Messinger v Festa,*94 AD2d 792). Additionally, the attorney’s affirmation suggesting that there is less calendar congestion in Westchester County is equivocal and, under the circumstances pre*1081sented here, is not a basis for granting a change of venue pursuant to CPLR 510 (3) *(see, A.M.I. Intl, v Gary Pool Sales & Serv.,*94 AD2d 890, 891; *see also,*7A Carmody-Wait 2d, NY Prac § 48:71, at 189).

Moreover, defendant is not entitled to an order changing venue as of right because Suffolk County is a proper county *(see,*CPLR 503 [d]; 510 [1]).

Accordingly, the order granting a change of venue is reversed and defendant’s motion denied. Plaintiff’s cross motion is not properly before us. (Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Suffolk County, Jones, J.—Change of Venue.) Present— Callahan, J. P., Denman, Green, Balio and Davis, JJ.