Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Department of Commerce International Trade Administration [A-201-836]
 AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce.
 SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce (Commerce) preliminarily determines that Maquilacero S.A. de C.V. (Maquilacero) and Regiomontana de Perfiles y Tubos S.A. de C.V. (Regiopytsa) made sales of subject merchandise at less than normal value during the period of review (POR) August 1, 2016, through July 31, 2017. Interested parties are invited to comment on these preliminary results.
 DATES: Applicable September 6, 2018.
 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Madeline Heeren or Kent Boydston, AD/CVD Operations, Office VI, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-9179 or (202) 482-5649, respectively.


SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:  Background On October 16, 2017, we published the notice of initiation for this administrative review.[1]
                    
                     For a complete description of the events that followed the initiation of the review, 
                    *see*
                     the Preliminary Decision Memorandum.[2]
                    
                     Commerce exercised its discretion to toll deadlines for the duration of the closure of the Federal Government from January 20 through 22, 2018,[3]
                    
                     moving the deadline for the preliminary results to May 6, 2018.[4]
                    
                     On April 5, 2018, we extended the time limit for completion of the preliminary results of the review to no later than August 31, 2018.[5]
                    
                     A list of topics included in the Preliminary Decision Memorandum is included in the Appendix to this notice. The Preliminary Decision Memorandum is a public document and is on file electronically 
                    *via*
                     Enforcement and Compliance's Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS). ACCESS is available to registered users at 
                    *https://access.trade.gov*
                     and to all parties in the Central Records Unit, located in room B8094 of the main Department of Commerce building. In addition, a complete version of the Preliminary Decision Memorandum can be accessed directly at 
                    *http://enforcement.trade.gov/​frn/​.*
                     The signed and the electronic versions of the Preliminary Decision Memorandum are identical in content. Scope of the Order The scope of this order covers certain welded carbon-quality light-walled steel pipe and tube, of rectangular (including square) cross section, having a wall thickness of less than 4 mm. The term carbon-quality steel includes both carbon steel and alloy steel which contains only small amounts of alloying elements. Specifically, the term carbon-quality includes products in which none of the elements listed below exceeds the quantity by weight respectively indicated; 1.80 percent of manganese, or 2.25 percent of silicon, or 1.00 percent of copper, or 0.50 percent of aluminum, or 1.25 percent of chromium, or 0.30 percent of cobalt, or 0.40 percent of lead, or 1.25 percent of nickel, or 0.30 percent of tungsten, or 0.10 percent of molybdenum, or 0.10 percent of niobium, or 0.15 percent of vanadium, or 0.15 percent of zirconium. The description of carbon-quality is intended to identify carbon-quality products within the scope. The welded-carbon quality rectangular pipe and tube subject to the order is currently classified under the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS) subheadings 7306.61.50.00 and 7306.61.70.60. This tariff classification is provided for convenience and Customs purposes; however, the written description of the scope of the order is dispositive. Methodology Commerce is conducting this review in accordance with sections 751(a)(1)(B) and (2) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act). Export price was calculated in accordance with section 772 of the Act. Normal value was calculated in accordance with section 773 of the Act. For a full description of the methodology underlying our conclusions, 
                    *see*
                     the Preliminary Decision Memorandum. Preliminary Results of Review We preliminarily determine that, for the period August 1, 2016, through July 31, 2017, the following weighted-average dumping margins exist: Producer/Exporter
Weighted-
                             average 
                             margin 
                             (percent)Maquilacero S.A. de C.V.
4.48Perfiles y Herrajes LM, S.A. de C.V.6
10.80Productos Laminados de Monterrey S.A. de C.V.
10.80Regiomontana de Perfiles y Tubos S.A. de C.V.
16.23
 Disclosure and Public Comment We 
                    
                    will disclose to parties to the proceeding any calculations performed in connection with these preliminary results of review within five days after the date of publication of this notice.[7]
                    
                     Interested parties may submit case briefs not later than 30 days after the date of publication of this notice in the 
                    **Federal Register**
                    .[8]
                    
                     Rebuttal briefs, limited to issues raised in the case briefs, may be filed not later than five days after the date for filing case briefs.[9]
                    
                     Parties who submit case or rebuttal briefs in this proceeding are encouraged to submit with each argument: (1) A statement of 
                    ( print page 45212)
                    the issue; (2) a brief summary of the argument; and (3) a table of authorities.[10]
                    
                     Case and rebuttal briefs should be filed using ACCESS.[11] Interested parties who wish to request a hearing must submit a written request to the Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance within 30 days of the date of publication of this notice.[12]
                    
                     Requests should contain: (1) The party's name, address and telephone number; (2) the number of participants; and (3) a list of issues parties intend to discuss. Issues raised in the hearing will be limited to those raised in the respective case and rebuttal briefs. If a request for a hearing is made, we intend to hold the hearing at the U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230, at a date and time to be determined.[13]
                    
                     Parties should confirm by telephone the date, time, and location of the hearing two days before the scheduled date. Unless extended, we intend to issue the final results of this administrative review, which will include the results of our analysis of all issues raised in the case and rebuttal briefs, within 120 days of publication of these preliminary results in the 
                    **Federal Register**
                    , pursuant to section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act. Assessment Rates Upon issuance of the final results, Commerce will determine, and U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) shall assess, antidumping duties on all appropriate entries covered by this review.[14]
                    
                     If a respondent's weighted-average dumping margin is not zero or 
                    *de minimis*
                     in the final results of this review and the respondent reported reliable entered values, we will calculate importer-specific 
                    *ad valorem*
                     assessment rates for the merchandise based on the ratio of the total amount of dumping calculated for the examined sales made during the period of review to each importer to the total entered value of those same sales in accordance with 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1). If the respondent has not reported reliable entered values, we will calculate a per-unit assessment rate for each importer by dividing the total amount of dumping for the examined sales made during the period of review to that importer by the total sales quantity associated with those transactions. Where an importer-specific 
                    *ad valorem*
                     assessment rate is zero or 
                    *de minimis,*
                     we will instruct CBP to liquidate the appropriate entries without regard to antidumping duties in accordance with 19 CFR 351.106(c)(2). If the respondent's weighted-average dumping margin is zero or 
                    *de minimis*
                     in the final results of review, we will instruct CBP not to assess duties on any of its entries in accordance with the 
                    *Final Modification for Reviews, i.e.,*
                     “ {w}here the weighted-average margin of dumping for the exporter is determined to be zero or 
                    *de minimis,*
                     no antidumping duties will be assessed.” [15] Regarding entries of subject merchandise during the period of review that were produced by Maquilacero and Regiopytsa and for which they did not know that the merchandise was destined for the United States, we will instruct CBP to liquidate un-reviewed entries at the all-others rate of 3.76 percent, as established in the less-than-fair-value investigation of the order, if there is no rate for the intermediate company(ies) involved in the transaction.[16]
                    
                     For a full discussion of this matter, 
                    *see Assessment Policy Notice.*[17] For the firms covered by this review, we intend to issue liquidation instructions to CBP 15 days after publication of the final results of this review. Cash Deposit Requirements The following cash deposit requirements will be effective upon publication of the final results of this administrative review for all shipments of the subject merchandise entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or after the publication date of the final results of this administrative review, as provided by section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) The cash deposit rate for Maquilacero and Regiopytsa and other companies listed above will be equal to the weighted-average dumping margin established in the final results of this administrative review; (2) for previously reviewed or investigated companies not listed above, the cash deposit rate will continue to be the company-specific rate published for the most recently completed segment of this proceeding in which they were reviewed; (3) if the exporter is not a firm covered in this review, a prior review, or in the investigation but the producer is, the cash deposit rate will be the rate established for the most recently completed segment of this proceeding for the producer of the merchandise; and (4) the cash deposit rate for all other producers or exporters will continue to be the all-others rate of 3.76 percent. These cash deposit requirements, when imposed, shall remain in effect until further notice. Notification to Importers This notice also serves as a reminder to importers of their responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation of the relevant entries during this review period. Failure to comply with this requirement could result in the Department's presumption that reimbursement of antidumping duties occurred and the subsequent assessment of double antidumping duties. Notification to Interested Parties We are issuing and publishing this notice in accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.221(b)(4). Dated: August 29, 2018. Christian Marsh, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance.
 Appendix List of Topics Discussed in the Preliminary Decision Memorandum 1. Summary 2. Background 3. Scope of the Order 4. Companies Not Selected for Individual Examination 5. Discussion of the Methodology 6. Date of Sale 7. Comparisons to Normal Value A. Determination of Comparison Method B. Results of the Differential Pricing Analysis 8. Product Comparisons 9. Export Price 10. Normal Value A. Home Market Viability as Comparison Market B. Level of Trade C. Sales to Affiliates D. Cost of Production 1. Calculation of Cost of Production 2. Test of Comparison Market Sales Prices 3. Results of the Cost of Production Test E. Calculation of Normal Value Based on Comparison Market Prices F. Price-to-Constructed Value Comparison 11. Currency Conversion
                        ( print page 45213) 12. Recommendation


# Footnotes

1.
    
                         
                        *See Initiation of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews,*82 FR 48051 (October 16, 2017) (
                        *Initiation Notice*). Back to Citation
 2.
    
                         
                        *See*
                         Memorandum, “Decision Memorandum for Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review: Light-Walled Rectangular Pipe and Tube from Mexico; 2016-2017”, dated concurrently with this notice. Back to Citation
 3.
    
                         If the new deadline falls on a non-business day, in accordance with Commerce's practice, the deadline will become the next business day. Back to Citation
 4.
    
                         
                        *See*
                         Memorandum for The Record from Christian Marsh, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance, performing the non-exclusive functions and duties of the Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance, “Deadlines Affected by the Shutdown of the Federal Government” (Tolling Memorandum), dated January 23, 2018. All deadlines in this segment of the proceeding have been extended by 3 days. The new deadline falls on Sunday, May 6, 2018. The next business day is Monday, May 7, 2018. Back to Citation
 5.
    
                         
                        *See*
                         Memorandum, “Light-Walled Rectangular Pipe and Tube form Mexico: Extension of Deadline for Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2016/2017,” dated April 5, 2018. Back to Citation
 6.
    
                         
                        *See Light-Walled Rectangular Pipe and Tube from Mexico: Initiation and Expedited Preliminary Results of Changed Circumstances Review,*82 FR 54322 (November 17, 2017) and accompanying Preliminary Decision Memorandum, unchanged in 
                        *Light-Walled Rectangular Pipe and Tube from Mexico: Final Results of Changed Circumstances Review,*83 FR 13475 (March 29, 2018) (Commerce determined that Perfiles LM, S.A. de C.V. is the successor-in-interest to Perfiles y Herrajes). Back to Citation
 7.
    
                         
                        *See*19 CFR 351.224(b) Back to Citation
 8.
    
                         
                        *See*19 CFR 351.309(c)(1)(ii). Back to Citation
 9.
    
                         
                        *See*19 CFR 351.309(d)(1). Back to Citation
 10.
    
                         
                        *See*19 CFR 351.309(c)(2) and (d)(2). Back to Citation
 11.
    
                         
                        *See*19 CFR 351.303. Back to Citation
 12.
    
                         
                        *See*19 CFR 351.310(c) Back to Citation
 13.
    
                         
                        *See*19 CFR 351.310(d). Back to Citation
 14.
    
                         
                        *See*19 CFR 351.212(b)(1). Back to Citation
 15.
    
                         
                        *See Antidumping Proceedings: Calculation of the Weighted-Average Dumping Margin and Assessment Rate in Certain Antidumping Proceedings: Final Modification,*77 FR 8101, 8102 (February 14, 2012) (
                        *Final Modification for Reviews*). Back to Citation
 16.
    
                         
                        *See Certain Steel Nails from the Republic of Korea, Malaysia, the Sultanate of Oman, Taiwan, and the Socialist Republic of Vietnam: Antidumping Duty Orders,*80 FR 39994 (July 13, 2015). Back to Citation
 17.
    
                         
                        *See Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties,*68 FR 23954 (May 6, 2003) (
                        *Assessment Policy Notice*). Back to Citation


[FR Doc. 2018-19337 Filed 9-5-18; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P