alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                                CERTIFICATION OF
                             CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                                OF GADZOOKS, INC.

This certification is provided pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002 and accompanies the annual report on Form 10-K (the "Form 10-K") for the
year ended January 31, 2004 of Gadzooks, Inc. (the "Issuer").

I, James A. Motley, the Chief Financial Officer of the Issuer certify that to
the best of my knowledge:

            (i)   the Form 10-K fully complies with the requirements of section
                  13(a) or section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
                  (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and

            (ii)  the information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Issuer.

Dated: May 14, 2004

/s/ James A. Motley
-------------------------------------
    James A. Motley
    Chief Financial Officer

Subscribed and sworn to before me
this ____ day of ____________, 2004.

___________________________________
Name:______________________________
Title: Notary Public

My commission expires:

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
                  provided to Gadzooks, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and
                  Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
The State of



# Fourth Court of Appeals
**San Antonio, Texas**

August 4, 2015

N o. 04

- 15

- 00183

- CR

Richard LARES

, Appellant

v.

The STATE of Tex as, Appellee

From the 399th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2006CR10110 Honorable Juanita A. Vasquez

- Gardner, Judge Presiding



### ORDER

On July 21, 2015, we granted Appellant’s motion for extension of time to file his pro se brief until August 20, 2015. Before Appellant received the order granting his motion , Appellant
mailed what he describes as an “incomplete” brief

. Thereafter, Appellant filed a “Motion for Leave to Amend Appellant’s Brief” which we construe as a motion to file a pro se brief.

Appellant’s motion to file a pro se brief is GRANTED. The pro se brief Appellant filed on July 30, 2015, is deemed timely filed.

On that date, Appellant also filed a motion to amend his pro se brief in which he seeks “permission to file an Amended P ro Se B rief to complete his Appellate Brief.” Appellant’s motion is GRANTED. Appellant may file an amen ded brief

— which would completely replace his July 30, 2015 brief

— or a supplemental brief

— which would be added to his July 30, 2015 brief. Appellant’s amended or supplemental brief must be filed by August 20, 2015.

_________________________________ Patricia O. Alvarez, JusticeIN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 4th day of August, 2015

.

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle Clerk of Court
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Denali Commission","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.denali.gov","author_name":"denaliadmin","author_url":"https:\/\/www.denali.gov\/author\/denaliadmin\/","title":"Updated Public Comment Session.","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"Uw9vVawnTJ\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.denali.gov\/upcoming-public-comment-session-2\/\">Updated Public Comment Session.<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.denali.gov\/upcoming-public-comment-session-2\/embed\/#?secret=Uw9vVawnTJ\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Updated Public Comment Session.” — Denali Commission\" data-secret=\"Uw9vVawnTJ\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.denali.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/02\/cropped-low-res-from-web.png","thumbnail_width":512,"thumbnail_height":512}
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT MONTERIUS DESEAN SHARP, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D17-1379 ) STATE OF FLORIDA, ) ) Appellee. ) ) Opinion filed February 2, 2018. Appeal from the Circuit Court for Hillsborough County; Chet A. Tharpe and Samantha L. Ward, Judges. Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public Defender, and Joanna Beth Conner, Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

CRENSHAW, MORRIS, and BLACK, JJ., Concur.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Herman Robinson, Appellant.

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Defendant contends that the trial court erred in admitting into evidence at his second trial his redacted testimony from his previous trial. He asserts that the testimony was inadmissible at his retrial because it was the fruit of the illegally seized evidence that this court suppressed when it granted him a new trial *(see, People v Robinson,*144 AD2d 960).

If testimony at a defendant’s first trial was compelled by the People’s introduction of illegally seized evidence, that testimony was tainted and cannot be used at his retrial *(see, Harrison v United States,*392 US 219; *People v Levan,*62 NY2d 139, 145-146). Further, it is the People’s burden to prove that their use of the illegally obtained evidence did not compel defendant to testify *(see, Harrison v United States, supra,*at 225-226).

Hqfe, defense counsel objected to the admission of defendant’s prior testimony and asserted that it was compelled by the introduction of the illegally seized evidence that included the knife used in the murder. In response thereto, the People wholly failed to provide any showing that defendant’s testimony was not induced by the introduction of the illegally seized evidence. Because the People failed to establish that the underlying illegality did not taint defendant’s testimony, the court erred in admitting defendant’s testimony into evidence *(see, Harrison v United States, supra,*at 224-226). The erroneous admission of defendant’s testimony, however, does not require reversal because its introduction was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt *(see, People v Almestica,*42 NY2d 222, 226; *People v Crimmins,*36 NY2d 230, 242). There was overwhelming evidence of defendant’s guilt in the record and we conclude that there was no reasonable possibility that defendant’s testimony contributed to his conviction *(see, People v Crimmins, supra).*

We have reviewed defendant’s remaining contentions and find them to be without merit. (Appeal from Judgment of Supreme Court, Monroe County, Bergin, J.—Murder, 2nd Degree.) Present—Dillon, P. J., Doerr, Boomer, Pine and Law-ton, JJ.
#### Beatrice Haenel et al., Individually and as Trustees of Jack Epstein and Another, Deceased, Appellants, v November and November et al., Respondents.

Order of the Supreme Court, New York County (Eugene L. Nardelli, J.), dated October 1, 1990, which granted the motion by defendants for an order striking the matter from the trial calendar and directed the plaintiffs to respond to prior requests for discov*183ery and inspection of trust and tax records, is unanimously modified, on the law, the facts and in the exercise of discretion, to vacate that portion of the order directing plaintiffs to produce individual and trust tax returns or authorizations for such returns and other trust records solely reflecting income and expenses, and otherwise affirmed, with costs and disbursements payable to plaintiffs.

Plaintiffs commenced this legal malpractice action individually and as trustees under the wills of Jack and Mollie Epstein based upon their holdings and the holding of Jack and Mollie Epstein of shares of stock in Allmetal Screw Products Company, Inc. They allege that as a result of defendants’ malpractice, in drafting an agreement in 1977 subsequently held invalid, Morris Epstein another shareholder in charge of the corporation’s operations, was enabled to engage in corporate waste, resulting in the diminution of the sale price received by plaintiffs for their shares. Plaintiffs also seek legal fees allegedly expended in their efforts to enforce the negligently drawn and invalid agreement of 1977.

Plaintiffs’ tax returns have no bearing on the issue of liability or damages stemming from the decrease in value of Allmetal’s stock and the expenditure of legal fees arising out of defendants’ legal malpractice. Accordingly, the requests for both individual and trust tax returns and other records reflecting income and expenses are improper since defendants have not established the requisite "strong showing of necessity” to justify their disclosure *(Roth v American Colonial Ins. Co.,*159 AD2d 370). Defendants assert that plaintiffs failed to timely move for a protective order. The general rule under such circumstances ordinarily forecloses inquiry into the propriety of such a notice (CPLR 3122, 3133). However, where the material sought is privileged under CPLR 3101 or the disclosure requests are palpably improper, as herein, this rule is not strictly observed. *(See, Spancrete Northeast v Elite Assocs.,*148 AD2d 694, 695.) Concur—Murphy, P. J., Sullivan, Rosenberger, Ross and Asch, JJ.
## In the Court of Appeals Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

No. 02

- 24

- 00151

- CV

B RIAUNNA D ANIELS

, Appellant

V

.

T EXAS W ORKFORCE C OMMISSION

AND A MERICREDIT F INANCIAL

S ERVICES

, I NC

. , Appellees §

§

§

§ On A ppeal from the 48th District Court

of Tarrant County ( 048

- 342675

- 23 )

May 23, 2024

Memorandum Opinion by Justice Kerr

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that the

appeal should be dismissed. It is ordered t ha t the appeal is dismissed for want of

jurisdiction

.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

By _ /s/ Elizabeth Kerr

__________________ Justice Elizabeth Kerr
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Denali Commission","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.denali.gov","author_name":"Brian Aldridge","author_url":"https:\/\/www.denali.gov\/author\/baldridge\/","title":"Cordova Harbor Rebuild Project. Finding of No Significant Impact.","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"qmX7iGWTDO\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.denali.gov\/cordova-harbor-rebuild-project-finding-of-no-significant-impact\/\">Cordova Harbor Rebuild Project. Finding of No Significant Impact.<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.denali.gov\/cordova-harbor-rebuild-project-finding-of-no-significant-impact\/embed\/#?secret=qmX7iGWTDO\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Cordova Harbor Rebuild Project. Finding of No Significant Impact.” — Denali Commission\" data-secret=\"qmX7iGWTDO\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.denali.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/09\/cropped-low-res-from-web-150x150-1.png","thumbnail_width":150,"thumbnail_height":150}
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markm an Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_________________________________________ Clerk September 24, 2012

h0917 

# Order

September 24, 2012

145211

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 145211

COA: 309332

Muskegon CC: 07

- 055605

- FH

CALVIN RANDOLPH, JR.,

Defendant

- Appellant.

____________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the May 9, 2012 order of

the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that

the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.
| /s/ Joseph G. Kaveski                     |   | /s/ Nicholas G.Berchtold                                   |
|-------------------------------------------|--------|------------------------------------------------------------|
| Joseph      G. Kaveski                    |   | Nicholas      G. Berchtold                                 |
| Chief      Executive Officer and Director |   | Vice      President of Finance and Chief Financial Officer |
| Principal      Executive Officer          |   | Principal      Financial and Accounting Officer            |
|                                      |   |                                                       |
| /s/ John M. Davenport                     |   | /s/ Laurence V. Goddard                                    |
| John      M. Davenport                    |   | Laurence      V. Goddard                                   |
| President      and Director               |   | Director                                                   |
|                                      |   |                                                       |
| /s/ Michael A. Kasper                     |   | /s/ Paul von Paumgartten                                   |
| Michael      A. Kasper                    |   | Paul      von Paumgartten                                  |
| Director                                  |   | Director                                                   |
|                                      |   |                                                       |
| /s/ David N. Ruckert                      |   | /s/ Philip E. Wolfson                                      |
| David      N. Ruckert                     |   | Philip      E. Wolfson                                     |
| Director                                  |   | Director                                                   |
|                                      |   |                                                       |
| /s/ J. James Finnerty                     |   |                                                       |
| J.      James Finnerty                    |   |                                                       |
| Director                                  |   |                                                       |

----
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 166 (Monday, August 27, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Pages 43659-43660]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-18474]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

RIN 0648-XG437


Mid-Atlantic Fishery Management Council (MAFMC); Public Meeting

AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and 
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.

ACTION: Notice; public meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Mid-Atlantic Fishery Management Council's (Council) 
Ecosystem and Ocean Planning (EOP) Committee will hold a meeting.

DATES: The meeting will be held on Wednesday, September 12, 2018, from 
10 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. See SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION for agenda details.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will take place at the Royal Sonesta Harbor 
Court, 550 Light Street, Baltimore, MD 21202; telephone (410) 234-0550.
    Council address: Mid-Atlantic Fishery Management Council, 800 N 
State Street, Suite 201, Dover, DE 19901; telephone: (302) 674-2331; 
website: www.mafmc.org.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Christopher M. Moore, Ph.D., Executive 
Director, Mid-Atlantic Fishery Management Council, telephone: (302) 
526-5255.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The purpose of the meeting is for the EOP

[[Page 43660]]

Committee to utilize the information from the approved Risk Assessment 
and identify scientific and management priorities, as outlined in the 
Ecosystem Approach to Fisheries Management (EAFM) guidance document. 
The Committee will consider different ways to evaluate the Risk 
Assessment to help identify priorities for Council consideration. In 
addition, the Committee may take up any other business as necessary. A 
detailed agenda and any pertinent background documents will be made 
available on the Council's website (www.mafmc.org) prior to the 
meeting.

Special Accommodations

    The meeting is physically accessible to people with disabilities. 
Requests for sign language interpretation or other auxiliary aid should 
be directed to M. Jan Saunders, (302) 526-5251, at least 5 days prior 
to the meeting date.

    Dated: August 22, 2018.
Tracey L. Thompson,
Acting Deputy Director, Office of Sustainable Fisheries, National 
Marine Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 2018-18474 Filed 8-24-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 3510-22-P
<PAGE>


                                                                    Exhibit 23.2

                          INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

         We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration
statements on Form S-8 No's. 333-38521, 333-38523, 333-38525, 333-38527,
333-38531, 333-38533, 333-38537, 333-48167, 333-38539, 333-61395, 333-65688,
333-65704, Form S-4 No's. 333-61401 and 333-47926 and Form S-3 No. 333-64979 of
Security Capital Group of our reports dated January 30, 2001, except as to Note
16, which is as of February 28, 2001, with respect to the balance sheets of
Archstone Communities Trust as of December 31, 2000 and 1999, and the related
statements of earnings, shareholders' equity, and cash flows for each of the
years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2000, and the related
schedule, which reports appear in the December 31, 2001 annual report on Form
10-K/A of Security Capital Group Incorporated.



                                                        KPMG LLP

Chicago, Illinois
April 11, 2002
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement
No. 33-72293 of Golden State Vintners, Inc. on Form S-8 of our report dated
August 15, 2000, appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Golden State
Vintners, Inc. for the year ended June 30, 2000.

Fresno, California
August 15, 2000
#### The State, ex rel. Greenstein, Appellant, *v.*Clifford et al., Judges, Appellees.

(No. 30364

Decided November 21, 1945.)

*79
      *Mr. Hugh M. Bennett,*for appellant.

*Messrs. Stump, Wardlaw, King & Mitchell,*for appellees.

By the Court.

The petition in prohibition, which was filed in the Court of Appeals, has attached thereto and made a part thereof a copy of the amended petition filed by Thai in the Court of Common Pleas. It is apparent from both petitions that Thai was seeking a money judgment on an agreement or a contract of employment.

Section 11215, General Code, confers on the Court of Common Pleas original jurisdiction in all civil cases where the sum or matter in dispute exceeds the jurisdiction of justices of the peace.

*80General jurisdiction of the subject matter having-been conferred by statute upon the Court of Common Pleas, a writ of prohibition should not issue denying that court the right to determine whether such jurisdiction attaches under the facts of a particular case. *Wisner*v. *Probate Court,*145 Ohio St., 419, 61 N. E. (2d), 889.

The writ of prohibition may not be invoked as a substitute for appeal. 32 Ohio Jurisprudence, 586, Section 24; *State, ex rel. Levy,*v. *Savord,*143 Ohio St., 451, 55. N. E. (2d), 735.

The judgment of the Court of Appeals is affirmed.

*Judgment affirmed.*

Weygandt, C. J., Zimmerman, Bell, Williams, Turner, Matthias and Hart, JJ., concur.