alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Rebecca McPherson Office ofGeneral Counsel Regulation & Enforcement Div. 800 Independence Ave SW Room 915A Washington, D.C. 20591

I justreading an article in one ofthe magazines I subscribe to about the Air France Air Bus crash that left Brazil and was headed to France about 2 years ago. Killing allthe people onboard

. One ofthe items that I found interesting and would like the FAA to look into is that although the Air Bus is a state-of-the-art aircraft, I think it has one fatal flaw. The competition, BOEING, does not have this flaw. Apparently from everythingthe investigators were able get from the BLACK BOX, RED BOX and whatever else they had to look at. Itwas determined that the Co-Pilot [sitting in the RH seat] had is right hand pullingback on his JOY Stickthe whole time

. Apparently there is no feedback circuit on any Air Bus plane to alert the Pilotor Co-Pilotwhen someone else is trying to make a control move. All BoeingAircraft have this redundant feature. AlthoughI do not like regulation, this is one area I would like to see the US Government step in. I don't fly as much as I used to, but I still do travel and I am now concerned for my safety. The proposal I would like to see implemented immediately would be that all commercial passengercarrying aircraft within US Airspace have direct feedback for flight controls between Pilot and Co-Pilot. This mightputAir Bus on notice thatthey have an unsafe product and also give the US Company BOEING an advantage

.

:fred :Jferscfie{man 3760 

### 'Wtnrfina Pine Vr. 

## x. :M.etamora, 

### :MI48455**Tritz~z6o@tir.com**
# RECH/V i U.S
. DEPARTMEN T O FTRANSPORTATIO N' ' j ^ y ^- ^ FEDERA LAVIATIO N ADMINISTRATIO N ^'' ^ 

## ^^OCKP T I n th e Matte r

of : FA A Docke t No
. CP09NM001 0 FA A Cas e No
. 2007NM70015 6 Federa l Expres s Corporation ,

Responden t Judg e Goodwi n 

## fpp i <3J&0^'C>7X /

RESPONDENT' S RESPONS ET O ADMINISTRATOR' S MOTIO N T O

RESCHEDUL EHEARIN G
Federal Expres s Corporation , b y an dthroug hit s attorneys , an dpursuan t t o sectio n 13.21 8 o f th e Federa l Aviatio n Administration' s Rule s o f Practic e i nCivi l Penalty Proceedings , 1 4 CF R§ 13.218 , file s thi s Respons e t o th e Administrator' s Motio nt o Reschedul e Hearing , an di n support thereo f states : 1
. O nMay 26 , 2010 , Judg e Goodwi n issue da norde r settin g th e hearing fo r

th e abov e cas e o n Jul y 2 7 an d28 , 2010
. 2
. O nJun e 1,2010 , th e Administrato r file damotio nseekin g t o reschedul e th e hearing du e t o aschedulin g conflic t o f it s primary witness
. 3
. Witnesses an dattorney s for Federa l Expres s Corporatio nar e availabl e Augus t 2"^ * throug hAugus t

13*
. WHEREFORE , Federa l Expres s Corporatio n respectfull y request s that th e Court reschedul e th e hearing a

t atim e tha t

th e witnesse s an dattorney s for Federa l Expres s Corporatio nare available.Respectfull y submitted ,

FEDERA LEXPRES S CORPORATIO N Courtne y E
. Felt s Senio r Attorney , Regulatory Affair s 362 0 Hack s Cros s Road , Buildin g B , 3" ^ Floo r Memphis , TlS

f 3812 5 (901 ) 434-863 2 (901 ) 434-828 3 FA X
CERTIFICAT EO FSERVIC E I hereb y certif

y that atru e an dcorrec t

cop y o f th e foregoin g was forwarde dvi a FedE x Overnigh t

delivery o n th e M ' da

y o f June , 201 0 to : Th e Honorabl e Richar dC
. Goodwin , Administrativ e La w Judg e Offic e o f Hearings , M-2 0 U.S
. Departmen t

o f Transportatio n 120 0 New Jerse y Avenue , S E Eas t Buildin g Groun dFloor , Roo mE12-32 0 Washington , D C 2059 0 Federal Aviatio n Administratio n 80 0 Independenc e Avenue , S W Wilbu r Wrigh t Building , Suit e 2W100 0 Washington , D C 2059 1 Attn : Hearin g Docke t

Clerk , AGC-43 0 Mr
. Jame s Conneel y Attorne y Federa l Aviatio n Administratio n Offic e o f th e Chie f Counse l Enforcemen t

Division , AGC-3 0 80 0 Independenc e Avenue , S W Room912- C Washington , D C 2059 1Lawrenc e W
. Bierlei n 110 1 30thStreet , NW , Suite 50 0 Washington , D C 2000 7 (202 ) 625-835 5 (202 ) 625-436 3 FA X

Courtne y E
. Felt s
Order entered April 2, 2015

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-14-01152-CV

THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER, Appellant

V.

JOHNNY FELIPE MUNOZ, Appellee

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 5

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. CC-10-00309-E

ORDER

We GRANT court reporter Vikki Ogden’s March 31, 2015 request for an extension of 

time to file the reporter’s record. The reporter’s record shall be filed by JUNE 5, 2015.

/s/ ELIZABETH LANG-MIERS 

JUSTICE
STATE OF CONNECTICUT / 

DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

May 2, 2011 

Mr. Dave Conroy, Chief of Air Programs Branch 

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 1 

5 Post Office Square 

Mail Code OEP05-02 

Boston, MA 02109-3912 

Re: Notification to Nearby States in Connecticut's Prevention of Significant Deterioration Permit 

Program 

Dear Mr. Conroy, 

In the proposed approval of Connecticut's infrastructure State Implementation Plan (SIP) for the 1997 

ozone national ambient air quality standard (76 FR 16358 ; March 23, 2011), EPA notes that 

Connecticut's prevention of significant deterioration (PSD) program regulation does not specifically 

provide for notice to nearby states per Section 126 of the Clean Air Act (CAA). However, EPA proposes 

to approve our infrastructure SIP based on our long-standing business practice of making such 

notifications . This letter is intended to notify EPA of planned revisions to Connecticut's PSD program 

procedural requirements to adopt a formal requirement to notify nearby states as required by the CAA. 

We have prepared an internal draft of revisions to section 22a-174-2a of the Regulations of Connecticut 

State Agencies, which sets out the procedural requirements associated with the PSD program. Those 

revisions include an expansion of our required notice to nearby states consistent with CAA section 126 

and 40 Code of Federal Regulations section 51 .166(q) . We intend to move these revisions forward 

through the required state regulatory adoption procedures, including seeking input from our many 

stakeholders prior to initiating a formal rulemaking. We understand that EPA would like to receive the 

revised final regulations in the form of a SIP revision by May 31, 2012, and we commit to pursue the 

adoption of the regulatory revisions with the desired date in mind. However, please be aware the State of 

Connecticut is dealing with an unprecedented budget crisis and staffing resources are severely 

constrained . 

While we are shepherding these regulatory revisions through the required state process, we will continue 

to provide notice to nearby states concerning our tentative determination to issue any major source permit 

or modification under our PSD program . 

I will keep you informed on our progress in seeking approval for the regulatory revisions . Please call 

Richard Pirolli at 860-424-4152 at any time you wish to know the state of our progress . 

Sincerely yours, 

Anne R. Gobin, Chief 

Bureau of Air Management 

cc: Anne Arnold, EPA Region I 

(Printed on Recycled Paper) 

79 Elm Street 9 Hartford, CT 06106-5127 

www.ct .gov/dep 

An Equal Opportunity Employer
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 408 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 408

                 To provide a veterans bill of rights.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 5, 1993

 Mr. Stearns introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                     Committee on Veterans' Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
                 To provide a veterans bill of rights.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Veterans Bill of Rights Act''.

SEC. 2. ADMINISTRATION OF RIGHTS AND BENEFITS.

    The Secretary of Veterans Affairs shall take any action necessary 
to ensure that any rights and benefits provided under title 38, United 
States Code, to veterans who qualify for the rights and benefits--
            (1) are made available to the veterans in any 1 State or 
        geographic location to the same extent as the rights and 
        benefits are made available to the veterans in any other State 
        or geographic location; and
            (2) are not denied to any veteran on the basis of race, 
        ethnicity, sex, religion, age, or geographic location.

SEC. 3. DEFINITION.

    For purposes of this Act, the term ``State'' has the same meaning 
given such term in section 101(20) of title 38, United States Code.

                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 10.15

June 30, 2007

John W. Henry & Company, Inc.
301 Yamato Road, Suite 2200
Boca Raton, Fl. 33431-4931

Attn: Mr. Ken Webster

Re:    Management Agreement Renewals

Dear Mr. Webster:

We are writing with respect to your management agreements concerning the commodity pools to which reference is made below (the ‘‘Management Agreements’’). We are extending the term of the Management Agreements through June 30, 2008 and all other provisions of the Management Agreements will remain unchanged.

| |   |                               
| | - | ------------------------------
| | • | Shearson Mid-West Futures Fund

| |   |                                                  
| | - | -------------------------------------------------
| | • | Shearson Lehman Select Advisors Futures Fund L.P.

| |   |                                           
| | - | ------------------------------------------
| | • | Smith Barney Mid-West Futures Fund L.P. II

| |   |                                        
| | - | ---------------------------------------
| | • | Smith Barney Westport Futures Fund L.P.

| |   |                                                 
| | - | ------------------------------------------------
| | • | Hutton Investors Futures Fund, L.P. II (HIFF II)

| |   |            
| | - | -----------
| | • | AURORA 2001

| |   |           
| | - | ----------
| | • | AURORA III

| |   |                                                        
| | - | -------------------------------------------------------
| | • | Salomon Smith Barney Diversified 2000 Futures Fund L.P.

| |   |                        
| | - | -----------------------
| | • | Citibank NA (Alera 100)

| |   |                                         
| | - | ----------------------------------------
| | • | JWH Strategic Allocation Master Fund LLC

| |   |                                   
| | - | ----------------------------------
| | • | Citigroup Diversified Futures Fund

| |   |                                       
| | - | --------------------------------------
| | • | CMF Institutional Futures Portfolio LP

---



Page 2

June 30, 2007

Please acknowledge receipt of this modification by signing one copy of this letter and returning it to the attention of Mr. Daniel McAuliffe at the address above or fax to 212-793-1986. If you have any questions I can be reached at 212-559-5043.

Very truly yours,

CITIGROUP MANAGED FUTURES LLC

By:


/s/ Jennifer MagroJennifer Magro
Chief Financial Officer & DirectorJOHN W. HENRY & COMPANY, INC.By:


/s/ Ken WebsterPrint Name:Ken Webster


DRMcA/sr

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF WATERSIDE CAPITAL CORPORATION AS PRESENTED IN
THE FORM 10-K FOR THE YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS' LEGEND.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                           1,269
<SECURITIES>                                    24,342
<RECEIVABLES>                                      540
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 2,081
<PP&E>                                             119
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  27,110
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              544
<BONDS>                                         12,300
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,492
<OTHER-SE>                                      12,579
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    27,110
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 2,897
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 1,387
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 418
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,092
<INCOME-TAX>                                        51
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,041
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                          (4)
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,037
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .70
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .70




</TABLE>
May 15, 2014

JUDGMENT

The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

JULIO C CANAS, Appellant

NO. 14-12-00959-CR V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

________________________________

This cause was heard ON REMAND from the Court of Criminal Appeals 

on the transcript of the record of the court below. The record reveals no error in the 

judgment. The Court orders the judgment be AFFIRMED.

We further order appellant pay all costs expended in the appeal.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.
----

Berichtigung der Aufforderung(en) zur Einreichung von Vorschlägen für indirekte FTE-Maßnahmen im Rahmen des spezifischen Programms für Forschung, technologische Entwicklung und Demonstration „Ausgestaltung des Europäischen Forschungsraums“

(Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union C 309 vom 15. Dezember 2004)

(2005/C 25/04)

Seite 11, Anhang, Punkt 10 erster Gedankenstrich:

anstatt:

muss es heißen:

----
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with this annual report of BMB Munai, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K/A-2 for the year ended March 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Gamal Kulumbetov, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the            Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 

 

|   | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

|   | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company. |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

| Date: November 12, 2009 | /s/ Gamal Kulumbetov                      |
|-------------------------|-------------------------------------------|
|                    | Gamal Kulumbetov, Chief Executive Officer |
Exhibit
10.64   THIRD AMENDMENT TO LEASE  This Third Amendment to
Lease (Third Amendment), dated as of December 3, 2002, is entered into by and
between TBI-Madrone I LLC, a California limited liability company (Landlord)
and Media Arts Group, Inc., a Delaware corporation (Tenant). RECITALS A.            Landlord and Tenant entered into a Lease dated December
20, 1999, and amended by a First Amendment to Lease dated July 21, 2000, and a
Second Amendment to Lease dated October 18, 2000 (collectively, the Lease) for
those certain premises at 900 Lightpost Way, Morgan Hill, California. B.            Landlord and Tenant now desire to amend the Lease to
remove certain rights of first offer to purchase and to payment on sale of the
Premises, and an option to expand, all of which were originally granted to
Tenant under the Lease. AGREEMENT In consideration of the
mutual covenants set forth herein, and other valuable consideration, receipt of
which is hereby acknowledged, Landlord and Tenant agree to amend the Lease as
follows: 1.             Right of First Offer to Purchase. Paragraph 41 of
the Lease is hereby deleted in its entirety. 2.             Payment to Tenant Upon Sale of Property.
Paragraph 42 of the Lease is hereby deleted in its entirety. 3.             Option to Expand. Paragraph 43 of the Lease is
hereby deleted in its entirety. Except as set forth in
this Third Amendment, the Lease is unmodified and in full force and effect. LANDLORD
  
  TENANTTBI-Madrone I, LLC, a California
  
  Media Arts Group, Inc., a Delawarelimited liability company
  
  corporationBy
  TBI-Lightpost I, a California
  By
  /s/ Herbert D. Montgomerylimited partnership, ManagerIts
  CFOBy
  Toeniskoetter & Breeding, Inc.Development, a California corporation,General PartnerBy
  /s/  Brad
  KrouskupIts
  President  -1-
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 172 (Wednesday, September 5, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Page 45119]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-19213]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY


Secretary of Energy Advisory Board; Noice of Renewal

AGENCY: Department of Energy, Office of the Secretary.

ACTION: Notice of renewal.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Pursuant to the Federal Advisory Committee Act, and following 
consultation with the Committee Management Secretariat, General 
Services Administration, notice is hereby given that the Secretary of 
Energy Advisory Board (SEAB) will be renewed for a two-year period 
beginning on August 29, 2018.
    The Committee will provide advice and recommendations to the 
Secretary of Energy on a range of energy-related issues.
    Additionally, the renewal of the SEAB has been determined to be 
essential to conduct business of the Department of Energy and to be the 
in the public interest in connection with the performance of duties 
imposed upon the Department of Energy, by law and agreement. The 
Committee will continue to operate in accordance with the provisions of 
the Federal Advisory Committee Act, adhering to the rules and 
regulations in implementation of that Act.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Michelle Sneed, Director, Office of 
Secretarial Boards and Councils, (202) 287-6793.

    Issued at Washington, DC, on August 29, 2018.
Wayne D. Smith,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 2018-19213 Filed 9-4-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6450-01-P
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3533 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3533

    To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to treat geological, 
  geophysical, and surface casing costs like intangible drilling and 
               development costs, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           November 18, 1993

Mr. Andrews of Texas introduced the following bill; which was referred 
                   to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to treat geological, 
  geophysical, and surface casing costs like intangible drilling and 
               development costs, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. GEOLOGICAL, GEOPHYSICAL, AND SURFACE CASING COSTS TREATED 
              LIKE INTANGIBLE DRILLING AND DEVELOPMENT COSTS.

    (a) In General.--Subsection (c) of section 263 of the Internal 
Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to intangible drilling and development 
costs in the case of oil and gas wells and geothermal wells) is amended 
by inserting before the last sentence the following new sentence: ``In 
the case of oil and gas wells, the tax treatment which applies to the 
taxpayer's intangible drilling and development costs shall also apply 
to surface casing costs and to geological and geophysical costs for the 
purpose of ascertaining the existence, location, extent, or quality of 
any deposit of oil or gas within the United States (within the meaning 
of section 638(1)) or a possession of the United States (within the 
meaning of section 638(2)).''.
    (b) Conforming Amendment.--Subparagraph (B) of section 57(a)(2) of 
such Code is amended by adding at the end the following new flush 
sentence:
                ``For purposes of clause (i), the term `intangible 
                drilling and development costs' includes surface casing 
                costs and geological and geophysical costs described in 
                section 263(c).''.
    (c) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply to costs paid or incurred after the date of the enactment of this 
Act in taxable years ending after such date.

                                 <all>
```
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned officer of RJD Green, Inc. (the "Company"), hereby certifies, to such officer's knowledge, that the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended February 28, 2013 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

/s/Zahoor Ahmad

Zahoor Ahmad

Chief Executive Officer

Chief Financial Officer

May 10, 2013
# I iS%
-IHr
COA# 08-12-00253-CR OFFENSE: 19.03 

# CTVIP. Alfredo Holguinv. The Sta¥of C0|JNTY: E| paso o I YLt. Iexas . COA DISPOSITION: Affirm 

## DATE: 09/12/2014 Publish: No TC CASE#: 20120D01334 TRIAL COURT: 243rd District Court



## THF rniiRT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS IN THE CPU Fl ECTRONIC RECORD Alfredo Holguin v. The State of STYLE: Texas ; PRO S£ Petition 

### FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW IN CCA IS: 

### K^H/ft 

# DATE: 0^jlil^)lf JUDGE

## : t*r* JaAju*— CCA#: CCA Disposition: DATE: JUDGE: SIGNED: PUBLISH:
REHEARING IN CCA IS: JUDGE: . 

# VW' / <*' PC:_ DNP:

MOTION FOR