alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
SAT Report

PMN Number: P-12-0416

SAT Date: 7/17/2012

Print Date: 1/8/2013

Related cases:

Concern levels:

Type of Concern: Health Eco Comments

Level of Concern: 2 1

 Persistence Bioaccum Toxicity Comments

3 31

Exposure Based Review:

Health: No

Ecotox: No

Routes of exposure: Health: Dermal Inhalation 

Ecotox: No releases to water

Fate: ;

Keywords:

 Keywords: LUNG, ONCO-LUNG, UNCERT-IMMUNO/MUTA

Summary of Assessment:

 Fate:

Fate Summary: P-12-0416-19

FATE: 

Solid 

S < 0.001 mg/L at 25 C (E)

VP < 1.0E-6 torr at 25 C (E)

BP > 400 C (E)

H < 1.00E-8 (E)
POTW removal (%) = 0-90 via sorption

Time for complete ultimate aerobic biodeg > mo

Sorption to soils/sediments = low - v.strong

PBT Potential: P3B3

*CEB FATE: Migration to ground water = negl – rapid

 Health:

 Health Summary: Absorption is poor all routes based on analogs. There is 

concern for lung effects from lung overload and lung cancer if inhaled for poorly soluble 

respirable particulates and carbon nanotubes and uncertain concern for mutagenicity and 

immunotoxicity for nano materials. Moderate concern. 

 Test Data: test material is P12-0417, study summaries only, study 

reports not available to the submitter:

negative in Salmonella and E coli

negative for chromosome aberrations in Chinese hamster ovary fibroblasts

negative in mouse micronucleus assay, ip

acute oral study in rats - no effect at 300 mg/kg’acute dermal study in rats - no effect at 2000 

mg/kg

28-day oral study in rats (25, 50, 100 mg/kg) - no dose related effects, decreased hemoglobin at 

25 mg/kg and decreased kidney weights at 50 mg/kg, no effect noted at 100 mg/kg

6-hr inhalation study in rats - no effect at 1 and 3 mg/m3 

 Ecotox:

Test Organism Test 

Type

Test End 

Point

Predicted Measured Comments

fish 96-h LC50 *

daphnid 48-h LC50 *

green algal 96-h EC50 *

fish _ chronic value *

daphnid _ chronic 

value

*

algal _ chronic 

value

*

Sewage Sludge 3-h EC50 _

Sewage Sludge _ Chronic 

Value

_

Ecotox Values Comments: Predictions are based on SARs for nonionic polymers; SAR 

chemical class = polymer - nonionic - carbon; MW > 1,000,000; solid with mp unknown (P); S 

< 0.001 mg/L at 20 C (P); pH7; effective concentrations based on 100% active ingredients and 

mean measured concentrations; hardness <150.0 mg/L as CaCO3; and TOC <2.0 mg/L;

Factors Values Comments

Assessment Factor 10
Concentration of Concern 

(ppb)

*

SARs nonionic polymers

SAR Class polymer-nonioinic-carbon

Ecotox Category Nonionic Polymers

Ecotox Factors Comments: 

 SAT Chair: Becky Jones
... . STATE OF COLORI\00 , ~· ------------------------------------------------------------------------

John W. Hickenlooper, Governor 

Christopher E. Urbina, MD, MPH 

Executive Director and Chief Medical Officer 

Dedicated to protecting and improving the health and environment of the people of Colorado 

4300 Cherry Creek Dr. S. Laboratory Services Division 

Denver, Colorado 80246-1530 8100 Lowry Blvd. 

Phone (303) 692-2000 Denver, Colorado 80230-6928 

Located in Glendale, Colorado (303) 692-3090 

http://www.cdphe.state.co.us 

Carl Daly 

Air Director 

U.S. EPA Region 8 

80C-EISC 

1595 Wynkoop Street 

Denver, Colorado 80202-1129 

March 19,2013 

RE: Sewage Sludge Incineration Units, Negative Declaration Letter 

Dear Mr. Daly, 

Colorado Department 

of Public Health 

and Environment 

The Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment, Air Pollution Control Division ("APCD") has 

completed a state-wide source identification for sources potentially subject to the United States Environmental 

Protection Agency ("EPA") Emission Guidelines and Compliance Times for Existing Sewage Sludge 

Incineration ("SSI") Units that Commenced Construction on or Before October 14,2010 (76 Fed. Reg. 15372, 

March 21 , 2011 ). The APCD identified no SSI units affected by these Emission Guidelines. 

Per 40 C.F.R. 60.23(b) the State of Colorado is submitting this negative declaration letter to exempt Colorado 

from the requirement to submit a Section l11(d) Plan for SSI Units. 

Please contact me at 303-692-3114 if you have any questions regarding this correspondence. 

st·t~ William Allison 

Director, Air Pollution Control Division 

Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment 
r• 

.. 

'
## 

EXHIBIT 23.1

Consent of Independent Accountants

We
hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on Form S-8 (No. 33-35368) of Minntech Corporation of our report dated August 15, 2000 relating to the
financial statements of Minntech Corporation Profit Sharing and Retirement Plan and Trust, which appears in this Form 11-K.

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Minneapolis, Minnesota
September 25, 2000

E-1

---

## QuickLinks
#### Clemente RODRIGUEZ, Petitioner, v. CITY OF MIAMI, Respondent.

No. 70-799.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Dec. 3, 1970.

Rehearing Denied Dec. 22, 1970.

PER CURIAM.

Certiorari denied.
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Denali Commission","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.denali.gov","author_name":"Bryan Meshke","author_url":"https:\/\/www.denali.gov\/author\/bryan\/","title":"Agency Financial Reports","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"wzCaF1F3sJ\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.denali.gov\/finance\/agency-financial-reports\/\">Agency Financial Reports<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.denali.gov\/finance\/agency-financial-reports\/embed\/#?secret=wzCaF1F3sJ\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Agency Financial Reports” — Denali Commission\" data-secret=\"wzCaF1F3sJ\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.denali.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/12\/AFR-2021-Cover.png","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":777}
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTIONAGENCY WASHINGTON D.C., 20460 OFFICE OF PREVENTION, PESTICIDES, AND TOXIC SUBSTANCES 

### NOV 19 2009

-c Michael A

. Santoro Director Environmental, Health, Safety, and Regulatory Affairs 3M Company 3M Center, Building 0236-01-B-10 St. Paul, MN 55144-1000 RE: November 12 Conference Call to discuss 3M Work Plan and EPA Comments Dear Mr. Santoro, During the November 12 conference call to discus the 3M Work Plan, EPA comments, and 3M's response to the EPA comments, EPA agreed that 3M will move forward with the implementation of the Phase 3 Work Plan. Regarding the Vegetative Uptake Study, EPAand 3M agreed that 3M

would consult with EPA after collectiMand analysis of additional soil samples and the agricultural survey. The purpose of tl~ consultation will be to discuss the concentrations of PFOAto be included within t~ Vegetative Uptake Study which will be completed by 3M as part of Phase 3 of thet `~' MemorandumOf Understanding between EPA and 3m .

cc: EPA Docket ID No. : OPPT-2004-0113 Cathy Fehrenbacher - Mail Code 7406M Lawrence Libelo - Mail Code 7406M Deborah Sherer - Mail Code 7406M Ilis, Director ical Control Division (7405M)



## CONTAINS NOCB!
N O T FO R PUB L ICAT IO N UNITED STATES C OUR T OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH C IR C UIT
FR ANC ISC O R

UB EN LUGOGONZALEZ, Pe titione r,
v. LORETTA E. LYNC H, Attorne y Ge ne ra l, R

e sponde nt . No. 13-71076 Age n c y No. A088-884-115
M EM O R ANDUM *

On Pe tition for Re vie w of a n Orde r of the B oa rd of Im m igration Appe a ls Subm itte d

June 22, 2015 ** B e fore : HAW K INS, GR AB ER , a nd W . FLETC H ER , C irc uit Judge s . Franc isc o R

ube n Lugo-Gonz a le z , a

native an d

c itiz e n of M e x ic o, pe titions for re vie w of the B o a

rd of Im m igration Appe a ls’ (“ B IA” ) orde r de ny ing his
m otion to re o pe n . W e have jurisdic tion unde r 8 U.S.C . § 1252. W e re vie w for an 

# FIL ED JUN 30 2015 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U
. S. CO URT O F APPEALS

* This disposition is not a ppropria te for public at ion a

nd is not pre c e de nt e xc e pt a s provide d

by 9th C ir. R . 36-3. ** The pa

ne l una nim ously c onc lude s this c a se is suita ble for de c ision without oral a

rgum e nt. Se eFe d. R . App. P. 34(a)(2).a

buse o f disc re tion the B IA’ s de nia l of a m otion to re o pe n. C

a no-Me r ida v . IN

S , 311 F.3d 960, 964 (9th C ir. 2002). W e de ny the pe t ition for re vie w. The B IA did not a

buse its disc re tion in deny ing Lugo-Gonz a le z ’ s m otion to
re ope n a s to his C onve ntion Against Torturec la im be c a use the e vide nc e he provide d wa s not pa

rtic u la r to him and did not e sta

b lish it is m

ore like ly tha n not he will betorture d by

the M e xic an gove rnm e nt or with its c onse nt or a c quie sc e nc e . Se e IN S v . Abudu , 485 U.S. 94, 104 (1988) (the B IA m ay de ny a m otion to re ope n for fa ilure to e sta

blish a prim a fa c ie c a se for the re l ie f sought). Lugo-Gonz a le z doe s not c ha l le nge the B IA’ s de nia l of his m otion to re ope n a s to his a sy lum and withholding of rem o v a l c la im s. Se eMartine z-Se rrano v . IN

S , 94 F.3d 1256, 1259- 60 (9th C ir. 1996) (issue s not spe c ific a lly ra ise d a nd a rgue d in a pa rty ’ s ope ning brie f are wa ive d). W e re

je c t Lugo-Gonz a l e z ’ s c onte ntion tha t the B IA m i ssta

te d the re c ord. Thus, we de ny the pe tition for re vie w. PE T IT IO N FO R RE V IE WDE NIE D.

1 3
- 7 1 0 7 6 2
#### Willie Joe GADSON, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 72-1059.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

May 8, 1973.

Alvin E. Entin, Miami, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., and Joel D. Rosenblatt, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appel-lee.

Before PEARSON, CHARLES CARROLL and HAVERFIELD, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Defendant-appellant, Willie Joe Gadson, was tried by a jury and convicted of robbery.

On appeal, he contends that the trial court committed reversible error in admitting the testimony of police officers relative to the identification of a recorded statement taken from the defendant’s accomplice.

To support his contention, appellant relies primarily upon Bruton v. United States, 391 U.S. 123, 88 S.Ct. 1620, 20 L.Ed.2d 476 (1968), wherein the U. S. Supreme Court held that in a joint trial a confession of a codefendant who fails to take the stand cannot be introduced into evidence. The Bruton case can be distinguished factually from the case sub judice in that there is no joint trial, the recorded statement of the defendant’s accomplice was merely identified but not introduced into evidence, and the testimony of police officers, not a confession of a codefendant, is the subject of concern. Therefore, we reject Bruton as binding.

Moreover, where, as in the case sub judice, evidence of guilt is overwhelming, a violation of Bruton is harmless error. Harrington v. California, 395 U.S. 250, 89 S.Ct. 1726, 23 L.Ed.2d 284 (1969).

We hold that the testimony of the police officers with regard to the identification of the statement taken from defendant’s accomplice, if error, was harmless error in light of the fact that the evidence of guilt was ample and compelling. See Williams v. State, Fla.App. 1971, 243 So.2d 215 and cases cited therein.

No reversible error having been demonstrated, we affirm the judgment of the trial court.

Affirmed.
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned officer of Preventia, Inc. (the "Company"), hereby
certifies, to such officer's knowledge, that the Company's Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2011 (the "Report")
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.

                                 /s/ Murray Friedman, DDS
                                 ----------------------
                                 Murray Friedman
                                 Chief Executive Officer
                                 Principal Financial Officer

August 15, 2011
----

HOLIDAYS IN 2005

(2005/C 65/03)

----
Comment Info: =================

General Comment:Petition for Exemption/Rulemaking

1. Operator's name and address

 Zachary E Linn

 101 Bayshore Ct.

 Hendersonville, TN 37075

2. The specific applicable regulations from which relief is required 

(CFRs)

 Application for Section 333 Exemption

3. How the operator will maintain an equivalent level of safety or no 

adverse impact to safety.

 I will be adhering to all rules regulating UAS flight including 

Visual Flight Rules (VFR) conditions within visual-line-of-sight (VLOS) 

of the pilot, and certain distances away from airports or heliports. 

4. How granting the exemption would be in the public interest.

 Approving this petition will allow us to provide better service to 

our roofing and real estate customers.

 

5. The proposed operations; and, The make and model of the aircraft for 

proposed operations.

 I will be flying a DJI Phantom 3 Advanced for the purpose of 

capturing aerial footage of constructions job sites for our customers.
EXHIBIT 23


               Consent of Independent Certified Public Accountants

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form
S-3 No. 333-5035 and No. 333-57067 and Form S-8 No. 333-50797) of Technical
Chemicals and Products, Inc. and in the related Prospectus of our report dated
March 3, 1999, with respect to the consolidated financial statements and
schedule of Technical Chemicals and Products, Inc. included in this Annual
Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 1998.


                                             /s/ Ernst & Young LLP

Miami, Florida
March 29, 1999

                                    60 of 61
<page>					                  EXHIBIT 32.02


CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Annual Report of Morgan Stanley Spectrum
Technical L.P. (the ?Partnership?) on Form 10-K for the period
ended December 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the ?Report?), I, Christian
Angstadt, Chief Financial Officer of Demeter Management
Corporation, the general partner of the Partnership, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my
knowledge:
(1)	The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
(2)	The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Partnership.









By:	  /s/	Christian Angstadt

Name:		Christian Angstadt
Title:	        Chief Financial Officer

Date:		March 31, 2009
#### In the Matter of Luis Avincola, Petitioner, v Thomas A. Coughlin, as Commissioner of the Department of Correctional Services, et al., Respondents.

Determination unanimously confirmed and petition dismissed *(see, People ex rel. Vega v Smith,*66 NY2d 130). (Article 78 Proceeding Transferred by Order of Supreme Court, Wyoming County, Dadd, J.) Present—Doerr, J. P., Green, Pine, Balio and Lawton, JJ.
----

----

I Ανακοινώσεις

Συμβούλιο

----

ΣΥΜΠΈΡΑΣΜΑΤΑ ΤΟΥ ΣΥΜΒΟΥΛΊΟΥ

της 21ης Φεβρουαρίου 2005

για την εκπαίδευση και την κατάρτιση στα πλαίσια της ενδιάμεσης επανεξέτασης της στρατηγικής της Λισαβόνας

(2005/C 85/01)

ΤΟ ΣΥΜΒΟΥΛΙΟ ΤΗΣ ΕΥΡΩΠΑΪΚΗΣ ΕΝΩΣΗΣ

Έχοντας υπόψη:

ΥΠΟΓΡΑΜΜΙΖΕΙ ΤΑ ΕΞΗΣ:

ΥΠΕΝΘΥΜΙΖΕΙ ΤΑ ΕΞΗΣ:

ΣΥΝΙΣΤΑ ΤΑ ΕΞΗΣ:

ΚΑΛΕΙ ΤΟ ΕΥΡΩΠΑΪΚΟ ΣΥΜΒΟΥΛΙΟ:

----

----

ΣΥΜΠΈΡΑΣΜΑΤΑ ΤΟΥ ΣΥΜΒΟΥΛΊΟΥ

της 21ης Φεβρουαρίου 2005

για την παιδεία στα πλαίσια της ενδιάμεσης επανεξέτασης της στρατηγικής της Λισαβόνας

(2005/C 85/02)

ΤΟ ΣΥΜΒΟΥΛΙΟ ΤΗΣ ΕΥΡΩΠΑΪΚΗΣ ΕΝΩΣΗΣ

Έχοντας υπόψη:

ΥΠΟΓΡΑΜΜΙΖΕΙ:

ΣΥΜΜΕΡΙΖΕΤΑΙ:

EΚΤΙΜΑ ΟΤΙ:

ΚΑΛΕΙ ΤΟ ΕΥΡΩΠΑΪΚΟ ΣΥΜΒΟΥΛΙΟ:

----

Επιτροπή

----

Ισοτιμίες του ευρώ (1)

6 Απριλίου 2005

(2005/C 85/03)

1 ευρώ= 

----

(1)

Πηγή: Ισοτιμίες αναφοράς που δημοσιεύονται από την Ευρωπαϊκή Κεντρική Τράπεζα.

----

----

Κατάλογος των κατάλληλων πιστοποιητικών που έχουν αναγνωρισθεί βάσει της διαδικασίας του άρθρου 18 παράγραφος 3 της οδηγίας 2001/25/EΚ για το ελάχιστο επίπεδο εκπαίδευσης των ναυτικών (1)

(Κατάσταση της 31ης Δεκεμβρίου 2004)

(2005/C 85/04)

(Κείμενο που παρουσιάζει ενδιαφέρον για τον ΕΟΧ)

----

(1)  Οι Κάτω Χώρες και το Ηνωμένο Βασίλειο δεν προέβησαν στην αναγνώριση μεμονωμένων ιδρυμάτων ναυτικής εκπαίδευσης και επιμόρφωσης και έχουν επιλέξει την αναγνώριση όλων των ιδρυμάτων ναυτικής εκπαίδευσης και επιμόρφωσης που έχουν εγκριθεί από τις αντίστοιχες τρίτες χώρες.

----

----

Προηγούμενη γνωστοποίηση συγκέντρωσης

(Υπόθεση αριθ. COMP/M.3773 — Lehman Brothers/Europe Realty/IHG Portfolio)

Υπόθεση υποψήφια για απλοποιημένη διαδικασία

(2005/C 85/05)

(Κείμενο που παρουσιάζει ενδιαφέρον για τον ΕΟΧ)

----

(1)ΕΕ L 24 της 29.1.2004, σ. 1.

(2)  Διατίθεται στην ιστοσελίδα της ΓΔ COMP:

http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/legislation/consultation/simplified_tru.pdf.

----

Διορθωτικά

----

Διορθωτικό στην πρόσκληση υποβολής προτάσεων έμμεσης δράσης ΕΤΑ στο πλαίσιο του ειδικού προγράμματος έρευνας, τεχνολογικής ανάπτυξης και επίδειξης Δόμηση του Ευρωπαϊκού Χώρου Έρευνας

(Επίσημη Εφημερίδα της Ευρωπαϊκής Ένωσης C 63 της 15ης Μαρτίου 2005)

(2005/C 85/06)

Στη σελίδα 15, στο παράρτημα, σημείο 8, στον πίνακα πρώτη στήλη πρώτη σειρά:

αντί:

«1.2.4.2.2»

διάβαζε:

«1.2.3.3».

Στη σελίδα 16, στο παράρτημα, σημείο 13, στον πίνακα τελευταία στήλη πρώτη σειρά:

αντί:

«1.2.4.2.1»

διάβαζε:

«1.2.3.3».

----
I

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 3924

To amend title 18, United States Code, to provide enhanced sentences to

repeat violent offenders.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 1, 1994

Mr. CARR of Michigan introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on the Judiciary

A BILL

To amend title 18, United States Code, to provide enhanced

sentences to repeat violent offenders.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Two-Time Loser Act

5 of 1994’’.

6 SEC. 2. LIFE IMPRISONMENT FOR TWO TIME VIOLENT OF7 FENDERS.

8 Section 3581 of title 18, United States Code, is

9 amended by adding at the end the following:

10 ‘‘(c) PUNISHMENT OF CERTAIN VIOLENT FELONS.—
2

•HR 3924 IH

1 ‘‘(1) GENERAL RULE.—Notwithstanding any

2 other provision of this title or any other law, in the

3 case of a conviction for a Federal violent felony, the

4 court shall sentence the defendant to prison for life,

5 if the defendant has previously been convicted of an6 other State or Federal violent felony which occurred

7 during a separate criminal episode.

8 ‘‘(2) DEFINITION.—As used in this section the

9 term ‘violent felony’ is a crime—

10 ‘‘(A) that involves as an element of the of11 fense the threatened use, use, or the risk of use

12 of physical force against the person of another;

13 ‘‘(B) for which the maximum authorized

14 imprisonment exceeds 15 years; and

15 ‘‘(C) which is not designated a mis16 demeanor by the law that defines the offense.

17 ‘‘(3) EFFECT ON DEATH PENALTY.—This sub18 section shall not be construed to prevent the imposi19 tion of the death penalty.’’.

Æ
#### In the Matter of Terry S. Triades et al., Appellants, v Manuel Mirabal, as Deputy Commissioner of the Division of Housing and Community Renewal, et al., Respondents.

In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the New York State Division of Housing and Com*542munity Renewal, dated November 5, 1987, which found that the petitioners’ premises constituted a horizontal multiple dwelling subject to rent regulation, the petitioners appeal from so much of a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Di Tucci, J.), dated November 16, 1988, as denied their petition in part.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs to the respondent Division of Housing and Community Renewal.

It is well established that horizontal multifamily structures may be subject to rent regulation provided that they share common facilities and services so as to warrant treating the housing as an integral unit *(see, Matter of Salvati v Eimicke,*72 NY2d 784, 792; *Matter of Krakower v State of N. Y. Div. of Hous. & Community Renewal,*137 AD2d 688; *Matter of Barn-beck v State Div. of Hous. & Community Renewal,*129 AD2d 51, 58). Prior to 1979, the subject premises had been one horizontal eight-family structure, under common ownership, with a single heating system. At that time, gas and electric meters were situated in the basement of one unit. Thereafter, the then landlord installed separate boilers, moved the electrical meters, and made an application to divide the existing tax lot. Under the circumstances, we are satisfied that the determination that the subject premises constituted a horizontal multiple dwelling subject to rent regulation, notwithstanding its conversion into independent buildings *(see,*9 NYCRR 2520.11 [d]), was not irrational nor arbitrary and capricious.

In addition, we note that the order dated November 3, 1983, of the Queens County District Rent Director, which purported to terminate the administrative proceeding on the ground that the premises did not fall under rent regulation, did not bar Division of Housing and Community Renewal (hereinafter the DHCR) from reinstating the administrative proceeding. That order was not released to the parties. Therefore, the parties were not given an opportunity to challenge the finding therein, and it cannot be deemed a final order precluding further action by the DHCR. Brown, J. P., Kooper, Harwood and Miller, JJ., concur.