alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Angel Rivera, Appellant.

(Appeal No. 1.)

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Defendant contends that the suppression court erred in denying his motion to suppress the evidence seized at his home. Because, as found by the suppression court, the police officers had articulable facts that warranted reasonably prudent officers in believing that the attic of defendant’s home might harbor an individual posing a danger to those on the scene, the officers properly conducted a limited protective sweep search of that area in conjunction with their arrest of defendant *(see, Maryland v Buie,*494 US 325; *People v Febus,*157 AD2d 380, 384-385, *lv granted*76 NY2d 898, *appeal dismissed*77 NY2d 835). Further, because the murder weapons were found in plain view during the course of the protective sweep, they were properly seized by the police *(see, People v Febus, supra; see also, People v Myrtetus,*43 NY2d 758, 759-760). Additionally, we find that there is no merit to defendant’s contention that the trial court erred in denying his mid-trial motion for a severance because the codefendant’s defense was not in irreconcilable conflict with defendant’s defense *(cf., People v Mahboubian,*74 NY2d 174). Defendant further contends that the *1060trial court committed reversible error by failing to strike Officer Pace’s unresponsive answer to codefendant’s counsel’s questioning. Although the officer’s answer was unresponsive and should have been stricken, the error was harmless because the proof of defendant’s guilt was overwhelming and there is no significant probability that the jury would have acquitted defendant but for this error *(see, People v Crimmins, 36*NY2d 230).

We have reviewed defendant’s remaining contentions and find them to be either unpreserved or without merit. (Appeal from Judgment of Supreme Court, Erie County, Rossetti, J.— Murder, 2nd Degree.) Present—Denman, J. P., Boomer, Pine, Lawton and Davis, JJ.
**Final Listing of Questionnaire Files for Steam Electric Rulemaking Record**

**Plant ID 04741**  **Removed from Public**  **(Non-CBI) Docket**  **1 Copyright** 

**Flag 2**  **File Name Description**  04741\04741_HardcopyLog.doc EPA log of hardcopy documents submitted x 04741\04741_Part A.xls Plant submitted survey file x 04741\04741_Part B.xls Plant submitted survey file x 04741\04741_Part C.xls Plant submitted survey file x 04741\04741_Part D.xls Plant submitted survey file x 04741\04741_Part H.xls Plant submitted survey file

04741\Certification Statement Plant ID 04741.pdf Plant certification statement x 04741\Follow-up\North_Branch_Power_Station_04741.doc Follow-up correspondence and materials for the survey. x 04741\Supplemental Documents\04741_NB_A5-2_site plan.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x x 04741\Supplemental Documents\04741_NB_A5-3_water balance.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 04741\Supplemental Documents\04741_NB_D3-1 diagram.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 04741\Supplemental Documents\04741_NB_D3-1 diagram.ppt Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 04741\04741_Checklist.xls EPA Technical Review Checklist Workbook

04741\04741_Completeness_Checklist.xls EPA Completeness Review Checklist 04741\04741_Cover Letter.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

1Final reviewed survey responses are located in the Steam Electric Technical Questionnaire Database

. 2Copyright documents are available from the docket.
LNT 12.31.2013 10-K Ex 10.14






Exhibit 10.14
ALLIANT ENERGY CORPORATION
INTERSTATE POWER AND LIGHT COMPANY
WISCONSIN POWER AND LIGHT COMPANY


Summary of Compensation and Benefits for
Non-Employee Directors 
Effective January 1, 2014


Effective January 1, 2014, the aggregate compensation for non-employee members of the Board of Directors (the “Board”) of Alliant Energy Corporation, Interstate Power and Light Company and Wisconsin Power and Light Company will be as follows:
Non-employee members of the Board will be entitled to receive the following annual retainers as applicable:
•$170,000 for each non-employee director;
•$20,000 for the Lead Independent Director of the Board;
•$13,500 for the Chairperson of the Audit Committee of the Board;
•$3,500 for each member of the Audit Committee of the Board other than the Chairperson; and
		
	•
	$7,500 for the Chairperson of each of the Compensation and Personnel Committee, the Nominating and Governance Committee, and the Safety, Environmental, Policy and Operations Committee of the Board.




Payments of all retainers shall be in cash and shall be paid quarterly in advance.


Each director may, and is encouraged to, voluntarily elect an amount of any of the cash compensation retainers to purchase common stock of Alliant Energy Corporation under the Shareowner Direct Plan or to have an amount be deferred in the Alliant Energy Deferred Compensation Plan Stock Account.


Alliant Energy Corporation maintains a Director's Charitable Award Program for directors who were elected or appointed to the Board on or prior to January 1, 2005. Under the Program, when a director dies, Alliant Energy Corporation will donate a total of $500,000 to one qualified charitable organization or divide that amount among a maximum of five qualified charitable organizations selected by the individual director. All deductions for charitable contributions are taken by Alliant Energy Corporation, and the donations are funded by Alliant Energy Corporation through life insurance policies on the directors.
**
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION OF CO-CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

**PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)**

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2019 (the“Report”) of Solar Senior Capital Ltd. (the “Registrant”), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, MICHAEL S. GROSS, the Co-Chief Executive Officer ofthe Registrant, hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge, that: 

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements ofSection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and 

(2) The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant. 

 
  
/s/ MICHAEL S. GROSS
**Name:**  **Michael S. Gross****Date:**  **November 4, 2019****
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

ROBERT KING, III, 

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 372 MAL 2022

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 20th day of December, 2022, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED.
#### Jacob Kraitenberger, Respondent, v Aloow Realty Corp., Also Known as Alow Realty Corp., Defendant, and Eunhee Park et al., Appellants.

In an action for specific performance of a contract for the sale of real property, the defendants Eunhee Park and Ohkil Park appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Rader, J.H.O.), dated June 13, 1989, which, after a nonjury trial, granted the plaintiff specific performance.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

On September 13, 1982, the plaintiff, as buyer, and the defendant Aloow Realty Corp., as seller, entered into a contract for the purchase of real property. The contract contained a number of conditions which required the seller to make certain repairs and alterations prior to the closing. None of the conditions were met, and the buyer refused to proceed with the closing. The seller eventually resold the property to the appellants but not before the plaintiff filed a lis pendens and commenced the instant action.

The trial court awarded the plaintiff buyer specific performance, and ordered the appellants to deliver title to him. The appellants claim that the buyer’s refusal to proceed to closing was unreasonable because the seller was not required to comply with the agreed-upon conditions prior to the closing.

Where the buyer’s refusal to close is based upon the seller’s failure to comply with minor or insignificant terms of the contract, the buyer’s refusal is unreasonable and the buyer is not entitled to specific performance of the contract *(see, Wong v Weissman,*133 AD2d 821; *Garibaldi Realty & Constr. Co. v Santangelo,*164 App Div 513, *affd*221 NY 673). However, in the present case, the contract conditions, which were exten*648sively negotiated and fully understood by the plaintiff buyer and the seller prior to entering into the contract, cannot be characterized as minor. Therefore, the court correctly found that it was within the plaintiff buyer’s right to refuse to close and the contract remained in full force and effect. Therefore, the plaintiff buyer was entitled to specific performance. Sullivan, J. P., Eiber, Rosenblatt and Ritter, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In connection with the Quarterly Report of Tesoro Logistics LP (the “Partnership”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Gregory J. Goff, Chief Executive Officer of Tesoro Logistics GP, LLC, the general partner of the Partnership, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





|    |                                                                                                                       
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




|    |                                                                                                                                                         
|--- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.




/s/ GREGORY J. GOFFGregory J. GoffChief Executive Officer  of Tesoro Logistics GP, LLC(the general partner of Tesoro Logistics LP)May 26, 2011





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Partnership and will be retained by the Partnership and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### Willie ABRAM, Petitioner, v. The STATE of Florida, Respondent.

No. 40724.

Supreme Court of Florida.

March 22, 1971.

Certiorari denied. 242 So.2d 215.

ROBERTS, C. J., and ERVIN, BOYD, McCAIN and DEKLE, JJ., concur.
Dismissed and Opinion Filed October 3, 2018.

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05

- 18

- 00621

- CV

URBAN LEAGUE OF GREA TER DALLAS AND NORTH CENTRAL TEXAS DBA

URBAN COMMUNITY CENT ER , Appellant

V. COMERICA BANK, A TEX AS BANKING ASSOCIATI ON , Appellee

On Appeal from the 14th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC

- 17

- 07418



### MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Chief Justice Wright, Justice Myers, and Justice Evans

Opinion by Justice Evans Before the Court is appellee’s motion to dismiss the appeal based on appellant ’ s failure to

file the clerk’s record

. Our records reflect Dallas County District Clerk Felicia Pitre informed the
Court July 9, 2018 that the clerk’s record was being held for non

- payment of the clerk’s fee. That
same day, w e directed appellant to file, within ten days, written verification it had paid or made
arrangements to pay for the clerk’s record. Although we cautioned appellant that failure to comply
could result in dismissal of the appeal without further notice, appellant ha s not responded. See

T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 37.3(b). Accordingly, we grant appellee’s motion and dismiss the appeal. See id.
42.3(b),(c).

180621F.P05 /David Evans/ DAVID EVANS JUSTICE– 2

– 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

JUDGMENT

URBAN LEAGUE OF GREATER DALLAS AND NORTH CENTRAL TEXAS DBA URBAN COMMUNITY CENTER, Appellant

No. 05

- 18

- 00621

- CV V.

COMERICA BANK, A TEXAS BANKING ASSOCIATION, Appellee On Appeal from the 14th Judicial District Court, Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC

- 17

- 07418. Opinion delivered by Justice Evans, Chief Justice Wright and Justice Myers participating.

In accordance with this Court’s op inion of this date, we DISMISS the appeal.

We ORDER appellee Comerica Bank, a Texas Banking Association, recover its costs, if any, of this appeal from appellant Urban League of Greater Dallas and North Central Texas dba Urban Community Center.

Judgment entered this 3 rd day of October, 2018.
SNAP CBI Substantiation Letter - Sanitized
ex10-3.htm - Generated by SEC Publisher for SEC Filing



 





 



Debt Assignment


 


 


Date:               1 July 2013


 


Between          Federal Mining Resources Limited (“Assignor”)


Located at       Suite 4703, Central Plaza, 18 Harbour Road, Wanchai, Hong Kong 


 


And                  Gold Billion Global Limited (“Assignee”)


Located at       Unit 1503, 15/F., The Phoenix, 21-25 Luard Road, Wanchai, Hong Kong


 


In consideration of the payment of US$1 paid by the Assignee, the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, the Assignor now assigns to the Assignee the sum of money in the amount of US Dollars Three Hundred Nine Thousand Three Hundred Thirty One And Cents Ninety Two Only (US$ 309,331.92), now due to the Assignee from Champmark Sdn Bhd (“Debtor”), under the financing obligation from the Assignor to the Debtor from time to time.


 


The Assignee is authorized to perform all necessary acts to collect the sum of money.


 


Both parties have carefully reviewed this Agreement, agreed to and accept all of its terms and conditions. This Agreement is executed as of the Effective Date above. 


 


 


 


Federal Mining Resources Limited                                Gold Billion Global Limited


 


 


 


/s/ Andy Kui Shing Lai                                                     /s/ Ming Ding Wu


                                                                                                                                         


Andy Kui Shing Lai                                                           Ming Ding Wu


Director                                                                           Director
The Honorable Paul A. Magnuson, Chief Judge, United States Distr ict Court for 1 theDistrict of Minnesota, adopting the report and recommendation of the Honorable Arthur J. Boylan, United States Magistrate Judge for the District of Minnesota. United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 97-1921

___________ John T. Maclin, * * Appellant, * * Appeal from the Unite d States v. * District Court for the * District of Minnesota. John J. Callahan, Commissioner of * Social Security, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellee. *

___________ Submitted: October 16, 199 7 Fi led: October 31, 1997

___________ Before WOLLMAN, LOKEN, and HANSEN, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. John T. Maclin appeals the district court & s orde r 1 gran ting summary judgment affirming the Commissioner & s decis ion to deny Maclin disability insurance benefit s (DIB ) and supplemental security income (SSI). After a careful review of the reco rd and the parties & submissions we conclude substantial evidence on the recor d as a whole-2-

supports the ALJ & s conclusion that Maclin was engaged i n substantia l gainful activity during the period for which he se eks benefits, and thus was ineligible for DIB o r SSI. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of th e district court. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. A true copy.
Attest: CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
Exhibit 32 

Certification of CEO and CFO Pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

as Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of TPG Specialty Lending, Inc. (the “Company”) for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2017, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), Joshua Easterly and Michael Fishman, as Co-Chief Executive Officers of the Company, and Ian Simmonds, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to such officer’s knowledge: 

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

 

| /s/ Joshua Easterly |
|---------------------|
| Name:               |   | Joshua Easterly |
| Title:              |   | Co-Chief Executive Officer |
| Date:               |   | August 2, 2017 |

 

| /s/ Michael Fishman |
|---------------------|
| Name:               |   | Michael Fishman |
| Title:              |   | Co-Chief Executive Officer |
| Date:               |   | August 2, 2017 |

 

| /s/ Ian Simmonds |
|------------------|
| Name:            |   | Ian Simmonds |
| Title:           |   | Chief Financial Officer |
| Date:            |   | August 2, 2017 |

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.
#### Allan N. FERGUSON, Jr., and Fred Munro Ferguson, Appellants, v. Lillian A. FERGUSON et al., Appellees.

No. 2127.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Fourth District.

March 28, 1969.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Broward County; James F. Minnet, Judge.

Appeal dismissed.
AFS-11-196-E April 1, 2011 Exemption No. 9890A Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2009-0416

Mr. Thomas E. Fosko Vice President, Regulatory Affairs Air Transport International, LLC

2800 Cantrell Road Little Rock, AR 72202

Dear Mr. Fosko:

This letter is to inform you that we have granted your petition to extend Exemption No. 9890. It explains the basis for our decision and describes its effect.

The Basis for Our Decision

By letter dated February 23, 2011, you petitioned the Federal Aviation Administration on behalf of Air Transport International, LLC (A TI), for an extension of Exemption No. 9890. That exemption from § 121.310(d)(4) of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR) allows ATI’s McDonnell Douglas DC–8 airplanes to carry passengers without a cockpit control device for each emergency light.

In your petition you indicate there has been no change in the conditions and reasons relative to public interest and safety that were the basis for granting the original exemption.

The FAA has determined that good cause exists for not publishing a summary of the petition

in the Federal Register . The requested extension of the exemption would not set a precedent, and any delay in acting on this petition would be detrimental to ATI.

Our Decision

In consideration of the foregoing, I find that a grant of exemption is in the public interest. Therefore, under the authority provided by 49 U.S.C. §§ 40113 and 44701, delegated to me by the Administrator, I grant your petition.2

The Effect of Our Decision

Our decision extends the termination date of Exemption No. 9890 to June 30, 2013, unless sooner superseded or rescinded.

All conditions and limitations of Exemption No. 9890 remain the same. This letter must be attached to, and is a part of, Exemption No. 9890.

Sincerely,

/s/ Raymond Towles Acting Director, Flight Standards

Service
PRK-EX10.6(b)-2013.12.31-10K






Exhibit 10.6(b)


Schedule identifying Non-Employee Directors 
of Park National Corporation covered by form 
of Split-Dollar Agreement,  made and 
  entered into effective as of December 28, 2007  


The following directors of Park National Corporation (“Park”) are covered by Split-Dollar Agreements (the “Split-Dollar Agreements”) as identified below, which Split-Dollar Agreements are identical to the form of Split-Dollar Agreement, to be made and entered into effective as of December 28, 2007, filed as Exhibit 10.2(a) to Park’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated and filed on January 2, 2008 (File No. 1-13006):


	
			
	Name of Director
	Subsidiary of Park which is a Party to
Split-Dollar Agreement
	Date of Split-
Dollar Agreement

	 
	 
	 

	Donna M. Alvarado
	The Park National Bank
	December 28, 2007

	Maureen H. Buchwald
	The Park National Bank (as successor by merger to The First-Knox National Bank of Mount Vernon)
	December 28, 2007

	F. William Englefield IV
	The Park National Bank
	December 28, 2007

	Dr. Charles W. Noble, Sr.
	The Park National Bank
	December 28, 2007

	John J. O’Neill
	The Park National Bank
	December 28, 2007

	Robert E. O’Neill
	The Park National Bank
	December 28, 2007

	Rick R. Taylor
	The Park National Bank (as successor by merger to The Richland Trust Company)
	December 28, 2007

	Leon Zazworsky
	The Park National Bank
	December 28, 2007
EXHIBIT 32





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350





In connection with the quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Superior Growth Corporation (the "Company") for the quarter ended September 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Joseph Rozelle, President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge that:





1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








Date: November 23, 2010





/s/ Joseph RozelleJoseph Rozelle

President

(Principal Executive and Financial Officer)











The foregoing certification is being furnished as an exhibit to the Report pursuant to Item 601(b)(32) of Regulation S-K and  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code) and, accordingly, is not being filed as part of the Report for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not incorporated by reference into any filings of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAI I REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER

NO. CAAP-22-0000388

IN THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF HAWAI I

IN THE MATTER OF THE RESIDUARY TRUST CREATED UNDER THE BETTY C. LEU REVOCABLE TRUST DATED MAY 25, 2006, AS AMENDED

APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIRST CIRCUIT

(TRUST NO. 1CTR-22-0000012)

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO DISMISS APPEAL (By: Leonard, Presiding Judge, McCullen and Chan, JJ.) Upon consideration of Respondent-Appellant Lester K.M. Leu's March 3, 2023 Motion to Dismiss Appeal, the papers in support, and the record,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the motion is granted and the appeal is dismissed, under Hawai i Rules of Appellate Procedure Rule 42(b). The parties shall bear their own attorneys' fees and costs on appeal.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai i, March 9, 2023. /s/ Katherine G. Leonard Presiding Judge /s/ Sonja M.P. McCullen Associate Judge /s/ Derrick H.M. Chan Associate Judge

Electronically Filed Intermediate Court of Appeals CAAP-22-0000388 09-MAR-2023 07:54 AM Dkt. 86 OGMD