alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
pol

ProcessIDstateIDcountyIDyearI D source TypeIDfuel TypeI D IM ProgramIDinspect

Freq test

StandardsI D begModel

YearID endModel

YearID useIMyn compliance Factor 101 47 471572006 21 1 1 1 11 1974 1995N 83.16 101 47 471572006 21 1 10 1 51 1996 2004N 83.16 101 47 471572006 31 1 1 1 11 1974 1995N 83.16 101 47 471572006 31 1 10 1 51 1996 2004N 83.16 101 47 471572006 32 1 1 1 11 1974 1995N 83.16 101 47 471572006 32 1 10 1 51 1996 2004N 83.16 101 47 471572006 52 1 1 1 11 1974 1995N 83.16 101 47 471572006 52 1 10 1 51 1996 2004N 83.16 102 47 471572006 21 1 1 1 11 1974 1995N 83.16 102 47 471572006 21 1 10 1 51 1996 2004N 83.16 102 47 471572006 31 1 1 1 11 1974 1995N 83.16 102 47 471572006 31 1 10 1 51 1996 2004N 83.16 102 47 471572006 32 1 1 1 11 1974 1995N 83.16 102 47 471572006 32 1 10 1 51 1996 2004N 83.16 102 47 471572006 52 1 1 1 11 1974 1995N 83.16 102 47 471572006 52 1 10 1 51 1996 2004N 83.16 112 47 471572006 21 1 8 1 43 1996 2004N 83.16 112 47 471572006 31 1 8 1 43 1996 2004N 83.16 112 47 471572006 32 1 8 1 43 1996 2004N 83.16 112 47 471572006 52 1 7 1 41 1996 2004N 83.16 112 47 471572006 52 1 8 1 43 2007 2004N 83.16 113 47 471572006 21 1 8 1 43 1996 2004N 83.16 113 47 471572006 31 1 8 1 43 1996 2004N 83.16 113 47 471572006 32 1 8 1 43 1996 2004N 83.16 113 47 471572006 52 1 7 1 41 1996 2004N 83.16 113 47 471572006 52 1 8 1 43 2007 2004N 83.16 301 47 471572006 21 1 10 1 51 1996 2004N 83.16 301 47 471572006 31 1 10 1 51 1996 2004N 83.16 301 47 471572006 32 1 10 1 51 1996 2004N 83.16 301 47 471572006 52 1 10 1 51 1996 2004N 83.16 302 47 471572006 21 1 10 1 51 1996 2004N 83.16 302 47 471572006 31 1 10 1 51 1996 2004N 83.16 302 47 471572006 32 1 10 1 51 1996 2004N 83.16 302 47 471572006 52 1 10 1 51 1996 2004N 83.16
Exhibit 10.20

 

BEIJING LEASE AMENDMENT

 

Beijing New Talent Academy (hereinafter referred to as Party A)

Address: Anhua 9 Houshayu, Shunyi District, Beijing, China
 Zip code: 100300

Tel: [             ], Fax:[      ]

Representative: Lan Chun Title: Principal

 

Nord Anglia Education Ltd (hereinafter referred to as Party B)

 

	
Address:
    	
Nord   House,
    
	
 
    	
Third   Avenue, Centrum 100
    
	
 
    	
Burton-upon-Trent,   Staffordshire
    
	
 
    	
DE14   2WD
    
	
 
    	
U.K.
    


Zip code:

Tel:[ 44-1283-496900], Fax:[ 44-1283-496541]

Representative: ANDREW FITZMAURICE Title: Chief Executive Officer

 

Objective: Party B has got the school license from the Ministry Of Education to opening an international school in Shunyi. In order to ensure the implementation of lease contract between Nord Anglia Education Ltd and New Talent Academy, both parties would like to make amendment to the lease contract and the management contract as follows.

 

	
 
    	

    	

    


 

Page 1 of 2











 

·                                          The lease commencement date shall be 1 September 2009 and the lease shall run for 21 years from this date. Notice of 5 year extension would therefore be made by 1 September 2029. Clause 3.1 of the lease to be amended accordingly.

 

·                                          Party B will pay Party A RMB 23,400,000 as fitting out fees upon signing the agreement and Party A will issue the invoice to Party B as fitting out fees at the same time. Party B should make payment within 2 weeks upon receiving the invoice.

 

·                                          Party B can not claim any compensation from Party A on the fitting out fees whenever the lease contract is terminated by any parties or reasons.

 

·                                          In consideration of the fitting out fees, Party A will waive its entitlement to any penalty under the lease. Clause 7.2.7 of the lease to be deleted.

 

·                                          Party A will agree to waive off the rent from 1st September 2009 to 31st August 2010. Both Parties will follow the terms and conditions in the signed lease contract by both parties during the period.

 

·                                          The lease amendment becomes effective from the date of signing by both parties.

 

 

	

    	

    


 

Date of Execution:                         , 2009

 

Page 2 of 2
113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 540 

AN ACT 

To designate the air route traffic control center located in 

Nashua, New Hampshire, as the ‘‘Patricia Clark Boston 

Air Route Traffic Control Center’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

†S 540 ES

1 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION OF PATRICIA CLARK BOSTON 

2 AIR ROUTE TRAFFIC CONTROL CENTER. 

3 (a) IN GENERAL.—The air route traffic control cen4 ter located in Nashua, New Hampshire, and any successor 

5 air route traffic control center at that location, shall be 

6 known and designated as the ‘‘Patricia Clark Boston Air 

7 Route Traffic Control Center’’. 

8 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg9 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

10 States to the air route traffic control center referred to 

11 in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the 

12 ‘‘Patricia Clark Boston Air Route Traffic Control Cen13 ter’’. 

Passed the Senate March 21, 2013. 

Attest: 

Secretary. 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 540 

AN ACT 

To designate the air route traffic control center loter’’. cia Clark Boston Air Route Traffic Control Cen- cated in Nashua, New Hampshire, as the ‘‘Patri-
#### STATE of Oklahoma ex rel. Robert J. HICKS, Director of the Oklahoma State Bureau of Investigation, Petitioner, v. The Honorable Donald D. THOMPSON, Judge of the District Court in and for Creek County, State of Oklahoma, Respondent.

No. 80855.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma.

May 3, 1993.

*ORDER*

Petitioner has filed an application to assume original jurisdiction and petition for writ of prohibition prohibiting enforcement of trial court’s order dated December 21, 1992 modifying its protective order of June 25, 1990 by permitting discovery of OSBI evidence and reports concerning its investigation of Mark Wojciewhowski and allowing parties in civil lawsuit to take the deposition of OSBI agent John (sic) Huntington by notice and subpoena. Having reviewed the files and arguments of counsel we find that the OSBI-procured evidence and reports concerning its investigation are privileged and confidential records under 74 O.S. § 150.5(D). The fact that the investigation is closed does not alter the confidential nature of those records. We therefore assume original jurisdiction and issue writ prohibiting Respondent from enforcing his order of December 21, 1992.

APPLICATION TO ASSUME ORIGINAL JURISDICTION GRANTED; WRIT OF PROHIBITION ISSUE.

HODGES, C.J., LAVENDER, V.C.J., SIMMS, HARGRAVE, OPALA, ALMA WILSON, SUMMERS and WATT, JJ., concur.

KAUGER, J., recused.
Exhibit 32.1





Certification of Chief Executive Officer


Pursuant to


Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)





In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2011 (the “Report”) of GSV Capital Corp. (the “Registrant”), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Michael T. Moe, the Chief Executive Officer of the Registrant, hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge, that:





(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.




/s/Michael T. MoeName:
Michael T. MoeDate:
November 10, 2011
Federal Aviation

Administration

Memorandum

Date: December 6, 2016

To: Docket FAA-2014-0504

From: Sheri Pippin, Air Transportation Division

Subject: Pilot Professional Development Notice of Proposed Rulemaking: 

Document Formatting

The FAA has received questions about the meaning of the dots in the proposed tables for 

part 121 appendices E and F.

The Federal Register has used ellipsis (i.e., the dots) to indicate spacing. It has no bearing 

on the substantive matters presented in the proposal.
Electronically Filed 

Supreme Court 

SCWC-29314 

01-AUG-2011 

SCWC-29314 10:02 AM 

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI'I 

STATE OF HAWAI'I,


Respondent/Plaintiff-Appellee,
 

vs.
 

JAMES WAYNE SHAMBLIN aka STEVEN J. SOPER,


Petitioner/Defendant-Appellant.


(CR. NO. 06-1-0507(4))
 

STATE OF HAWAI'I,


Respondent/Plaintiff-Appellee,
 

vs.
 

JAMES WAYNE SHAMBLIN aka STEVEN J. SOPER,


Petitioner/Defendant-Appellant.


(CR. NO. 07-1-016(4))
 

CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS
 

(CR. NO. 06-1-0507(4) and CR.NO. 07-1-0161(4))
 

ORDER REJECTING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI
 

(By: McKenna, J., for the court 1)


The Application for Writ of Certiorari filed on
 

June 27, 2011 by Petitioner/Defendant-Appellant James Wayne
 

Shamblin aka Steven J. Soper is hereby rejected.
 

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai'i, August 1, 2011. 

FOR THE COURT: 

Matthew S. Kohm for 

Petitioner on the 

application 

/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna 

Associate Justice 

1
 Considered by: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, Acoba, Duffy, and McKenna JJ.
1 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF IDAHO

Docket No. 40978

STATE OF IDAHO ,
Plaintiff-Respondent ,

v.

SHANNON LYNN MADISON ,
Defendant-Appellant

. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 2014 Unpublished Opinion No. 305

Filed: January 6, 2014

Stephen W. Kenyon, Clerk

THIS IS AN UNPUBLISHED OPINION AND SHALL NOT BE CITED AS AUTHORITY

Appeal from the District Court of the Fourth Judicial District, State of Idaho, Ada County. Hon. Lynn G. Norton , District Judge.

Judgment of conviction and unified sentence of five years, with a minimum period of confinement of six months , for misappropriation of persona l identifying information , and concurrent six

- month determinate sentence for petit theft, affirmed

.
Sara B. Thomas, State Appellate Public Defender; Shawn F. Wilkers on, Deputy Appellate Public Defender, Boise, for appellant.

Hon. Lawrence G. Wasden, Attorney General; Lori A. Fleming, Deputy Attorney General, Boise, for respondent.

________________________________________________ Before GUTIERREZ, Chief Judge; LANSING, Judge; and MELANSON, Judge

PER CURIAM
Shannon Lynn Madison was convicted of misappropriation of personal identifying

information , Idaho Code §§ 18

- 3126, 18

- 3128, and misdemeanor petit theft, I.C. §§ 18

- 2403(1),

18

- 2407(2). The district court sentenced Madison to a unified term of five years, with a
minimum period of confinement of six months

, for the misappropriation charge and a concurrent

determ inate term of six months for the petit theft. Madison appeals, contending that her sentence

is excessive.2 Sentencing is a matter for the trial court’s discretion. Both our st andard of review and the
factors to be considered in evaluating the reasonableness of the sentence are well established and
need not be repeated here. See State v. Hernandez , 121 Idaho 114, 117

- 18, 822 P.2d 1011, 1014

- 15 (Ct. App. 1991); State v. Lopez , 1 06 Idaho 447, 449

- 51, 680 P.2d 869, 871

- 73 (Ct. App.
1984); State v. Toohill , 103 Idaho 565, 568, 650 P.2d 707, 710 (Ct. App. 1982). When reviewing
the length of a sentence, we consider the defendant’s entire sentence. State v. Oliver , 144 Idaho
722, 726 , 170 P.3d 387, 391 (2007). Applying these standards, and having reviewed the record
in this case, we cannot say that the district court abused its discretion.
Therefore, Madison ’s judgment of conviction and sentence are affirmed.
#### In the Matter of Cleo K-H. New York City Department of Social Services, Respondent; Kim H., Appellant.

In a child abuse proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 10, the appeal is from a dispositional order of the Family Court, Kings County (Sparrow, J.), entered October 12, 1988, which, after a hearing, *inter alia,*extended placement of the child with the New York City Department of Social Services for 18 months. The appeal brings up for review an order of the same court, entered June 23, 1988, which, after a hearing, found that the subject child was abused by the appellant mother.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The determination by the Family Court that the appellant mother had sexually and physically abused her daughter, the subject of this proceeding, is supported by a preponderance of the evidence *(see,*Family Ct Act § 1046 [b]; *Matter of Nicole V.,*71 NY2d 112, 117; *Matter of Tammie Z.,*66 NY2d 1). A review of the record establishes that the petitioner presented a prima facie showing of abuse. The child’s out-of-court statements to her foster mother, to a clinical social worker, and to a caseworker, were sufficiently corroborated by medical evidence *(see, Matter of Jesse S.,*152 AD2d 581; Family Ct Act § 1046 [a] [vi]). Where, as here, the hearing court was confronted primarily with issues of credibility, its factual findings must be accorded great weight *(see, Matter of Sheila L.,*141 AD2d 730, 731). On this record, we find no basis upon which to disturb the court’s disposition of the issues *(see, Matter of Irene O.,*38 NY2d 776, 778; *Matter of Sheila L., supra,*at 731). *525Moreover, the appellant’s claims with respect to the manner in which the hearing was conducted and several of the evidentiary rulings and statements by the Family Court are either without basis in fact or lacking in merit. Brown, J. P., Harwood, Miller and O’Brien, JJ., concur.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Janice Richardson, Appellant.

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Counsel’s application to withdraw granted *(see, People v Crawford,*71 AD2d 38). (Appeal from Judgment of Ontario County Court, Henry, Jr., J.—Forgery, 2nd Degree.) Present— Denman, J. P., Boomer, Pine, Lawton and Davis, JJ.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

JERON BROWN,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 522 WAL 2016

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 6th day of July, 2017, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE
OFFICER AND PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT
OF 2002



The undersigned hereby certifies, in his
capacity as the Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer of Apollo Acquisition Corp.(the “Company”),
for the purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best
of his knowledge:



(1)           The
Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2012 (the “Report”) fully complies with
the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)           The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.



|Dated:   November 21, 2012 | /s/ Gregg Jaclin                                                                                           
|-------------------------- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                           | Gregg Jaclin, Chief Executive Officer
        (Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer)



This certification accompanies each Report
pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of §18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.



A signed original of this written statement
required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### John Christina, Respondent, v Edward Schielein et al., Appellants.

In an action to recover a deposit paid on a contract for the sale of real property, the defendants appeal from (1) an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Brucia, J.), entered September 23, 1989, which granted the plaintiffs motion for summary judgment, and (2) a judgment of the same court, entered December 5, 1989, which is in favor of the plaintiff and against them in the principal sum of $28,000.

Ordered that the appeal from the order is dismissed; and it is further,

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed; and it is further,

Ordered that the plaintiff is awarded one bill of costs.

The appeal from the intermediate order must be dismissed because the right of direct appeal therefrom terminated with the entry of judgment in the action *(see, Matter of Aho,*39 NY2d 241, 248). The issues raised on appeal from the order are brought up for review and have been considered on appeal from the judgment *(see,*CPLR 5501 [a] [1]).

The plaintiff entered into a contract to purchase a home owned by the defendants Edward and Immaculata Schielein for $280,000. Upon signing the contract, the plaintiff paid a deposit in the amount of $28,000, which was held in escrow by the defendant law firm. Pursuant to the contract, the plaintiff was obligated to make a "truthful and proper” application for a mortgage loan in the amount of $224,000 for a period of 30 years. The plaintiff claimed, and the Supreme Court found, that he had made a good-faith, truthful, albeit unsuccessful, attempt to obtain a mortgage, and was therefore entitled under the contract to a return of his deposit. We agree. The documentary evidence contained in the record which includes, *inter alia,*the plaintiffs 1988 W-2 wage statement, supports his claim that his application was truthful. Moreover, the rejection letters from two lending institutions specifically indicated that the plaintiff was turned down for a mortgage because he had insufficient income and not because he was unable or unwilling to verify his income. Accordingly, the record before us indicates that the plaintiff submitted "truthful and proper” applications and made a good faith attempt to obtain a mortgage. Since the plaintiff submitted every relevant document he had, which verified the veracity of the pertinent information contained in his applications, his failure *795to comply with the defendants’ discovery demands does not, as the defendants suggest, render a decision on the merits premature. Bracken, J. P., Sullivan, Miller and Ritter, JJ., concur.
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)

In connection with this Report on Form 10-Q for the three and six months ended March 31, 2013, or the Report, of PennantPark
Floating Rate Capital Ltd., or the Registrant, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Aviv Efrat, Chief Financial Officer of the Registrant, hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|              
|--------------
|/s/ Aviv Efrat
|Aviv Efrat    
|May 9, 2013
Exhibit 32 

Certification of CEO and CFO Pursuant to 

18 U.S.C. Section 1350, 

as Adopted Pursuant to 

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 

In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of TPG Specialty Lending, Inc. (the “Company”) for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2015, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), Joshua Easterly and Michael Fishman, as Co-Chief Executive Officers of the Company, and Alan Kirshenbaum, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to such officer’s knowledge: 

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

 

|                      |                            |
|----------------------|----------------------------|
| /s/ Joshua Easterly  |
| Name:                | Joshua Easterly            |
| Title:               | Co-Chief Executive Officer |
| Date:                | August 4, 2015             |
|                 |
| /s/ Michael Fishman  |
| Name:                | Michael Fishman            |
| Title:               | Co-Chief Executive Officer |
| Date:                | August 4, 2015             |
|                 |
| /s/ Alan Kirshenbaum |
| Name:                | Alan Kirshenbaum           |
| Title:               | Chief Financial Officer    |
| Date:                | August 4, 2015             |

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.