alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
V

Private Calendar No. 15

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 3917

[Report No. 103–837]

For the relief of Arthur A. Carron, Jr.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

FEBRUARY 24, 1994

Mr. STUPAK introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on the Judiciary

OCTOBER 5, 1994

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House and ordered to be printed

A BILL

For the relief of Arthur A. Carron, Jr.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. WAIVER OF TIME LIMITATIONS.

4 The time limitations set forth in section 3702(b) of

5 title 31, United States Code, shall not apply with respect

6 to a claim by Arthur A. Carron, Jr., of Bark River, Michi7 gan, for amounts due to him by the Department of the

8 Navy. The amounts due are represented by the following
2

HR 3917 RH

1 checks that were received but not negotiated by Arthur

2 A. Carron, Jr.:

3 (1) Treasury check number 2,831,843, dated

4 October 18, 1966, in the amount of $10,850.74 for

5 salary and expenses.

6 (2) Treasury check number 10,445,856, dated

7 January 29, 1971, in the amount of $1,361.00 for

8 salary and expenses.

9 (3) Treasury check number 71,681,041, dated

10 April 1, 1971, in the amount of $562.25 for retire11 ment pay.

12 SEC. 2. DEADLINE.

13 Section 1 shall apply only if Arthur A. Carron, Jr.,

14 or his authorized representative, submits a claim pursuant

15 to such section before the expiration of the 3-month period

16 beginning on the date of the enactment of this Act.

Private Calendar No. 15

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 3917

[Report No. 103–837]

A BILL

For the relief of Arthur A. Carron, Jr.

OCTOBER 5, 1994

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House and

ordered to be printed
REPORT OF THE AUDIT COMMITTEE


The  following  Report of the Audit  Committee  does not  constitute  soliciting
material and should not be deemed filed or  incorporated  by reference  into any
other Company  filing under the  Securities  Act of 1933 or the  Securities  and
Exchange  Act of  1934,  except  to the  extent  that the  Company  specifically
requests that the information be treated as soliciting  material or specifically
incorporates this report by reference therein.

During 2000,  the Audit  Committee of the Board of Directors  developed an Audit
Committee  Charter for (the "Charter"),  which was approved by the full Board on
March 27, 2000. During 2002, the Board of Directors  re-examined the Charter, as
well as the composition of the Audit  Committee,  in light of applicable law and
the adoption by the New York Stock Exchange  ("NYSE") of rules  governing  audit
committees.  Based upon this  examination,  the Board confirmed that the Charter
met all  requirements  of applicable laws and the NYSE rules and that members of
the Audit Committee are  "independent"  and  "financially  literate"  within the
meaning of the NYSE's rules as  interpreted  by the Board and within the meaning
of the Company's Audit Committee  Charter.  In addition,  the required number of
Audit Committee members have accounting and financial management experience,  as
the Board  interprets those terms in its business  judgment.  In accordance with
its Charter, the Audit Committee reports as follows:

          (i)  Management has reviewed the audited financial statements with the
               Audit  Committee,  including a  discussion  of the quality of the
               accounting principles applied and significant judgments affecting
               the Company's financial statements;

          (ii) the  independent  outside  auditors  have  discussed  the matters
               required by SAS-61 with the Audit Committee including the outside
               auditor's  judgment of the quality of those principles as applied
               and judgments referenced in (i) above under the circumstances;

          (iii)the  members  of  the  Audit  Committee  have  discussed  amongst
               themselves,  without  management or the outside auditor  present,
               the information disclosed to the Audit Committee and described in
               (i) and (ii) above; and

          (iv) the Audit  Committee,  in reliance on the review and  discussions
               conducted with management and the outside auditor pursuant to (i)
               and (ii) above,  believe that the Company's financial  statements
               are  fairly  presented  in  conformity  with  generally  accepted
               accounting principles in all material respects.

Audit Committee Members

         Peter J. Tanous (Chairman)
         T. Wayne Davis
         John R. Kennedy
         William M. Isaac
#### RESERVE INSURANCE COMPANY, an Illinois Corporation, et al., Appellants, v. Willie H. POLLOCK, as Administrator of the Estate of Joseph Daniels, Appellee.

No. 72-974.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Dec. 15, 1972.

Cowart & Onett, Miami, for appellants.

Abraham H. Shukat, Miami Beach, for appellee.

Before BARKDULL, C. J., and PEARSON and HAVERFIELD, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

This is an interlocutory appeal taken by defendant-appellant, Reserve Insurance Company, to review an adverse partial summary judgment on liability granted by the lower court.

Plaintiff-appellee, Willie H. Pollock, is the administrator of the estate of Joseph Daniels who died as a result of a collision with an uninsured automobile. Seeking to collect damages under the uninsured motorist provision of his insurance policy, plaintiff filed a lawsuit against his insurance carrier, Reserve Insurance Company, and the uninsured motorist.

Defendant insurance company moved to dismiss plaintiff’s complaint or to compel arbitration pursuant to the insurance policy. The court below then ordered arbitration and a dismissal of the complaint without prejudice. Plaintiff’s petition for rehearing was denied and he took an appeal to this court. The subsequent opinion, Pollock v. Reserve Insurance Company, Fla.App.1972, 258 So.2d 328, reversed the lower court and remanded the case for further proceedings on the basis that the insurance company waived its right to arbitration. Following compliance by the lower court with that opinion, plaintiff moved for a partial summary judgment as to the insurance company’s liability. The motion was granted and this appeal ensued.

As a matter of law defendant insurance company admitted coverage under the policy by the filing of its application for arbitration. Volkswagen Insurance Company v. Taylor, Fla.App.1967, 201 So.2d 624; Netherlands Insurance Company v. Moore, Fla.App.1966, 190 So.2d 191. We hold that defendant-appellant admitted its liability under the policy when it moved for arbitration, and it is estopped from taking an inconsistent position on this subsequent appeal. Palm Beach Co. v. Palm Beach Estates, 110 Fla. 77, 148 So. 544 (1933).

The judgment of the trial court should be affirmed, and it is so ordered.

Affirmed.
EXHIBIT 10.6a







FIRST AMENDMENT


TO


EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT







THIS AMENDMENT ( the “First Amendment”) is made as of the 18th day of November 2004, between The United Illuminating Company, a Connecticut Corporation (the “Company”) and John J. Prete (the “Executive”),







WITNESSETH THAT







WHEREAS, the Company previously entered into an employment agreement with the Executive dated as of March 19, 2004 (the “Employment Agreement”); and







WHEREAS, the Company and the Executive desire to amend the Employment Agreement by this First Amendment, effective as of November __, 2004, to reflect certain changes to the severance provisions under the Employment Agreement and to make two other clarifying revisions to the Employment Agreement;







NOW THEREFORE, the following Sections of the Agreement are hereby amended as follows:







1.                   The first sentence of Section 1(b) of the Agreement is revised to read as follows:







The term of this Agreement shall be for a period commencing on the date hereof and ending on the second anniversary of the date hereof, unless this Agreement is earlier terminated as provided in Section 5 (the “Initial Term”).







2.                    Section 6(a)(i) is revised to read as follows:







(i) The Executive’s Base Salary, earned but unpaid as of the Date of Termination, and Accrued Incentive Compensation (as defined in Section 4(b));







3.                    Section 6(c)(iv)(2), which describes, in part,  the severance that the Executive is entitled to upon a termination without cause is hereby revised to read as follows:







(2) the short-term annual incentive compensation payment to which the Executive would be entitled, calculated as if he had been employed by the Company on the last day of the year of his termination, as if both personal goals and Company goals had been achieved ‘at target’, without pro-ration for the fact that the Executive was employed only a portion of such year. Except for the assumption








that such goals shall have been achieved at target, personal and Company goals shall be defined and determined as set forth in Section 4(b) of this Agreement.







All of the other terms and conditions of the Employment Agreement shall remain in full force and effect.







	
 

	
 

	
THE UNITED ILLUMINATING COMPANY

	
	
 

	
 

	
 

	
 

	
	
Attest:

	
 

	
 

	
 

	
	
 

	
 

	
 

	
 

	
	
/s/ Susan E. Allen

	
 

	
By

	
/s/ Nathaniel D. Woodson

	
	
Susan E. Allen

	
 

	
Nathaniel D. Woodson

	
	
UIL Vice President Investor Relations

	
 

	
Its Chief Executive Officer

	
	
Corporate Secretary & Assistant Treasurer

	
 

	
 

	
	
 

	
 

	
 

	
 

	
	
 

	
 

	
/s/ John J. Prete

	
	
 

	
 

	
John J. Prete
REGULATORY EVALUATION

Directorate Identifier: 2010-NM-224-AD

Executive Order 12866:

Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action”?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:

Is the AD significant?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)

Regulatory Flexibility Act:

Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)

Intrastate Aviation in Alaska:

This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is it appropriate to include specific 

requirements for aircraft operated in Alaska, where aviation might be the only mode of 

transportation?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)
----

ORDER OF THE PRESIDENT OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

of 10 November 2004

in Case T-316/04: R Wam SpA v Commission of the European Communities

(State aid - Loans at reduced rates intended to enable an undertaking to become established in certain non-member countries - Obligation to recover - Application for interim measures - Suspension of operation - Urgency - None)

(2005/C 31/44)

Language of the case: Italian

In Case T-316/04 R: Wam SpA, established in Cavezzo di Modena (Italy), represented by E. Giliani, lawyer, against the Commission of the European Communities (Agents: V. Di Bucci and E. Righini, with an address for service in Luxembourg) – application for suspension of the operation of Commission Decision C(2004) 1812 final of 19 May 2004 on State aid C-4/2003 (ex NN 102/2002) – the President of the Court of First Instance made an order on 10 November 2004, the operative part of which is as follows:

----
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





The undersigned, Lester Esguerra Martinez, President, Secretary and Treasurer of Stevia Agritech Corp. (formerly Kids Only Market Inc.), hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
the report on Form 10-Q of Stevia Agritech Corp. (formerly Kids Only Market Inc.) for the period ended June 30, 2012 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Stevia Agritech Corp. (formerly Kids Only Market Inc.).





Dated: August 13, 2012





/s/ Lester Esguerra Martinez


Lester Esguerra Martinez


President, Secretary and Treasurer


(Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer)





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Stevia Agritech Corp. (formerly Kids Only Market Inc.) and will be retained by Stevia Agritech Corp. (formerly Kids Only Market Inc.) and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE

F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

O RDER

Appellate case name: Eil Sasson on behalf of 78 Acres, LP and Inwood Partners, LP v.

Schatte, Andrew, et al.

Appellate case number: 01

- 14

- 00633

- CV

Trial court case number: 2010

- 08868

Trial court: 189th District Court of Harris County

On August 28, 2014, appellees filed a joint motion for re consideration of this Court’s

order of August 26, 2014. The motion is DENIED

.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Rebeca Huddle

X Ac ting individually

Date: September 18, 2014
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                           5
       
<S>                                               <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                     12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                                       JAN-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                                          NOV-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                                            DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                                                 1430607
<SECURITIES>                                                                 0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                          2955344
<ALLOWANCES>                                                                 0
<INVENTORY>                                                                  0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                                             0
<PP&E>                                                                 3203853
<DEPRECIATION>                                                               0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                        51082266
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                                        0
<BONDS>                                                               36776659
<COMMON>                                                                     0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                                        0
<PREFERRED>                                                                  0
<OTHER-SE>                                                             1397281
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                          51082266
<SALES>                                                                      0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                                       4795653
<CGS>                                                                        0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                                0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                       2010545
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                             0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                                     3953210
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                                         225883
<INCOME-TAX>                                                                 0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                                     225883
<DISCONTINUED>                                                               0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                              0
<CHANGES>                                                                    0
<NET-INCOME>                                                            225883
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                                0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                                0
        

</TABLE>
No. 00-7401.

#### Corliss *v.*Washington Department of Corrections.

Sup. Ct. Wash. Certiorari denied.
Exhibit 32.2

SARBANES-OXLEY SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION

In connection with the Quarterly Report of American Renal Holdings, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Jonathan L. Wilcox, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that, to my knowledge:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                        |  | 
|--------------------------------------- |  | 
|/s/ Jonathan Wilcox                    
|Jonathan Wilcox
Chief Financial Officer

May 13, 2011
```

[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 230 (Friday, November 29, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Page 71611]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-28712]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS EXAMINATION COUNCIL

[Docket No. AS13-24]

Appraisal Subcommittee; Notice of Meeting

AGENCY: Appraisal Subcommittee of the Federal Financial Institutions 
Examination Council.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

    Description: In accordance with Section 1104 (b) of Title XI of the 
Financial Institutions Reform, Recovery, and Enforcement Act of 1989, 
as amended, notice is hereby given that the Appraisal Subcommittee 
(ASC) will meet in closed session:
    Location: Federal Reserve Board--International Square location, 
1850 K Street NW., 4th Floor, Washington, DC 20006.
    Date: December 11, 2013.
    Time: 10:00 a.m.
    Status: Closed
    Matters To Be Considered:

October 9, 2013 minutes--Closed Session
Preliminary discussion of State Compliance Reviews
Personnel

    Dated: November 25, 2013.
James R. Park,
Executive Director.
[FR Doc. 2013-28712 Filed 11-27-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6700-01-P
```
DHR-2013.12.31-EX-10.16












Exhibit 10.16


Danaher Corporation
Description of Non-Management Director Compensation Arrangements


Effective as of July 2013, each non-management director receives:
		
	•
	an annual cash retainer of $100,000, paid in four, equal installments following each quarter of service;


		
	•
	if a director attends more than twenty (20) Board and Board committee meetings in aggregate during a calendar year, such director will receive a cash meeting fee of $2,000 for each Board and committee meeting attended during such year in excess of such threshold, paid in aggregate following completion of such year;


		
	•
	an annual equity award with a target award value of $140,000, divided equally between options and RSUs. The stock options will be immediately exercisable upon grant. The RSUs will vest upon the earlier of (1) the first anniversary of the grant date, or (2) the date of, and immediately prior to, the next annual meeting of Danaher’s shareholders following the grant date, but the underlying shares are not issued until the earlier of the director’s death or the first day of the seventh month following the director’s retirement from the Board; and


		
	•
	reimbursement for Danaher-related out-of-pocket expenses, including travel expenses.




In addition, the chair of the Audit Committee receives an annual cash retainer of $25,000, the chair of the Compensation Committee receives an annual cash retainer of $20,000, the chair of the Nominating and Governance Committee receives an annual cash retainer of $15,000 and the lead independent director receives an annual cash retainer of $15,000, in each case paid in four, equal installments following each quarter of service.


Each non-management director can elect to defer all or a part of the cash director fees that he or she receives with respect to a particular year under the Non-Employee Directors’ Deferred Compensation Plan, which is a sub-plan under the 2007 Stock Incentive Plan. Amounts deferred under the plan are converted into a particular number of phantom shares of Danaher Common Stock, calculated based on the closing price of Danaher’s Common Stock on the date that such quarterly fees would otherwise have been paid. A director may elect to have his or her plan balance distributed upon cessation of Board service, or one, two, three, four or five years after cessation of Board service. All distributions from the plan are in the form of shares of Danaher Common Stock.