p. 1


# OAR Box 1384 Prepped by Charmelle Mathews



# Document

Number: 

# m23*0ll-E-19 4 Docket Number: 

# A-94-5 2

Printed 7/2/2008 8:42:11 AM

Sheet 234 of 264f E3BEH ESg ^ 0 

# MEMORANDU M DATE : Octobe

r 13,199 8 SUBJECT : Minute s o f

Septembe r 11,199 8 Smal

l Busines s Open Mqlding.Qufreach Meetin g fo r th e Reinforce d Plastic s MAC T Standar d P. 2



# A - <H'52 -

LOCATION : EP

A / Environmenta

l Research Cente

r / Auditorium Research Triangl e Park , N C 9:00 a.m.-3:0 0 p.m . PARTICIPANTS : .^/"^OC^T"" ^ 

## Mr . Mar k Ake r Mr . Daniel Boyd Ms . Lind aChappell Mr . Rick Colye r Mr . Allen DeBusk Mr . Benn y Duvall Ms . Debora

h Elmor e Mr . Jac k Hanle y Ms . Miss y Henricksen Mr . Charle s Heste

r Mr . Davi d R . Hilli s Mr . Willia mHoltzcla

w Mr . Michae

l Hoo d Mr . Rober t Jemiso n Mr . Ke n Kensingto n Ms . Patrici aKoma

n Mr . Ji mLe e Mr . Jo n Lhommedie

u Mr . Georg e McAlliste

r Ms . Shawn McKee Mr . Phi l McMillia

n Mr . Stev e McNall

y Mr . Ke n Meardo n Ms . Jane t Meye r Mr . Lowel l Mile s Mr . Richar

d Moor e Mr . Gar y Multanen Ake

r Plastics , Inc . Societ y o f the Plastic s Industr

y (SPI) / Composite s Institut

e (CI ) EPA/OAQPS/AQSSD/ISEG EPA/OAQPS/ESD/CCP

G Appalachia

n Plastics , Inc . Ake r Plastics , Inc . EPA/OAQPS/ITPID/ITG Proces s Technologies , Inc . Composit e Fabricator s Associatio n (CFA) PE S Eas t CarolinaUniversit

y Holtec , LT D representin g MF G Justin Tanks , Inc . Hoo dManufacturing , Inc . PE S Viatec , Inc . EPA/OAQPS/ESD/CCP

G Palme r o f Texas , Inc . Alte c Engineering , Inc . Aqu aBath , Inc . PE S Frees , Inc . CF A PE S EPA/OAQPS/ESD/CCP

G Mile s Fiberglas s & Plastics , Inc . Arrowhea d Plasti c Engineering , Inc . Fiberglas s Systems , Inc . (304)263-252 5 (410)827-624 4 (919)541-286 4 (919)541-526 2 (540)429-258 1 (304)263-252 5 (919)541-543 7 (219)365-996 4 (703)525-051 1 (919)941-033 3 (252)328-414 7 (302)856-352 1 (714)979-768 1 (919)941-033 3 (616)948-386 0 (919)541-412 0 (915)523-590 4 (219)293-196 5 (615)227-001 7 (919)941-033 3 (318)424-256 4 (703)525-051 1 (919)941-033 3 (919)541-525 4 (503)775-775 5 (765)286-053 3 (208)342-682 3

## Madelein e Stru m Octobe r 2,199 8 Pag e 2 P. 3



## PARTICIPANT S (Continued) : Mr . Mar k Naylor Mr . JimNoona

n Mr . Nei l Olse

n Ms . Melani e Proctor Mr . Dic k Putna m Mr . Fran k Ranson Mr . Joh n Schweitze

r Mr . Jonatha

n Spaulding Ms . Madeleine Stru

m Ms . Ki mTea l Ake

r Plastics , Inc . Indian aClea

n Mfg . Technology & Saf e Material s Institut

e Xerxe s Corporation PE S Eckle r Industries , Inc . The Phil Carte

r System , Inc . CF A Nort h En dComposites , Inc . EPA/OAQPS/ESD/CCP

G EPA/OAQPS/ESD/CCP

G (304)263-252 5

(765)463-474 9 (612)887-182 1 (919)941-033 3 (407)269-968 0 (734)622-016 2 (207)594-882 1 (919)541-238 3 (919)541-558 0 GOAL S AN

D OBJECTIVE S Ms . Stru mbega n th e meeting b

y reviewing th e meeting agend a(se e Attachmen t 1) . Thi s review wa s followe

d b y abrief roun d o f introductions . Afte

r th e introductions , Ms . Stru

mbega n by discussin g EPA' s mai

n goal s an d objective s fo

r th e meeting (se e Attachmen t 2) . Ms . Stru

mstate d tha t EPA' s mai

n goal s an d objective s fo

r th e meeting wer

e t o shar e informatio n abou

t th e progres s o f th e propose d rul e fo

r th e reinforce dplastic s industry , an dgathe r feedbac k fro mth e attendees . Ms . Stru masked if

the attendee s ha

d an y additiona

l goal s fo r th e meeting . Th

e attendee s di d no t offe r an y additiona

l goals . Afte

r discussing th

e goal s an dobjectives , Ms . Stru

mcontinue dwit

h th e briefing . BRIEFIN G O

N TH E MAC T RUL E DEVELOPMEN

T AN D TH E REQUIREMENT S CURRENTL

Y BEIN G CONSIDERE

D FO RPROPOSA

L (See Attachmen

t 3 ) During the briefing , Ms . Stru mcoveredthe followin

g items : lega

l requirements , standard s development , statu s o

f MAC T development , EPA' s approach fo r developin g MACT fo

r existin g ope n moldin g sources , an

d MACT standard s being consideredfo r existin g ope

n moldin g sources . Legal Requirements Ms . Stru mreviewed th e lega

l issue s an dterms associate

dwit h th e rule-making process . Ms . Stru mexplained tha

t maximu machievable control technology , o r "MACT, " i s th e ter

mcommonl

y use d to describ e th e standard s mandatedb y section 11 2 o

f th e Clea n Ai r Ac t (CAA) . EP

A i s 

# 2P. 4



## Madelein e Stru

m Octobe r 2,199 8 Pag e 3 required by th e CA

A to lis t categorie s o

f majo r source s of

HA P an ddevelop MAC T standard s fo r thes e categories . Reinforced plastic s productio n wa s on e of the majo r categorie s listed . Standards Development Ms . Stru mexplained the MAC

T floo r represent s the minimu

mleve l of stringenc y mandated b y the CAA . The MAC

T floo r fo r existing source s i s the average o f the bes t performing 1 2 percent of source s fo

r acategor y o r subcategor

y of mor e tha n 3 0 sources , o

r th e averag e o f

th e bes t performin g fiv e source s if ther e ar e les s tha n 3 0 sources . Th

e averag e ca

n b e th e media

n or th e mean . Ms . Stru

mals o indicate d tha

t subcategorie s ca

n b e basedo n classes , types , o r size s o f sources . Fo r

th e Reinforced Plastic s sourc e category , th e averag e (withi n eac h subcategory ) wa s take n to b e th e media

n facilit y (sixt h percentile) . Mr . Hoo d inquired if

resin s use d during polyme

r castin g coul db e averagedwit

h th e ge l coat s applied by afacilit

y tha t use s polyme

r casting . Ms . Stru

mrespondedin th e negativ e andindicate d tha t facilitie s using polyme

r casting coul

donl y averag e amon

g th e ge l coat s used . Ms . Stru

mstate d tha t becaus e polyme

r castin g i s aseparat

e subcategor

y fro mope n moldin g an dtha t averagin g i s no t allowe d acros s subcategories , averaging betwee n polyme r casting an dge l coatin g i s no t

allowed . Ms . Stru madded tha

t a12-mont h rollin g averag e optio n (fo r ope n molding ) i s bein g considere d t o ad d flexibility . Mr . Olse n aske d fo r a n explanation o

f the difference betwee

n "setting " an

d"calculating " th e MACT floor . Ms . Koma

n state d tha

t th e MACT floors ar

e calculate ddurin g th e rul e making process , and tha

t th e decision s ar

e se t whe n th e Federa

l Registe r proposa l notic e i s signedb

y th e Administrator . Ms . Koma

n adde d tha t comments ar

e take n afte r the proposa

l i n th e Federa

l Register , an d tha t change s ma

y b e mad e a s aresul

t of th e comments . Afte

r the commen

t period , th e rul e i s promulgated in the Federa

l Register . Mr . Olse

n inquire das t o whe n facilitie s mus t

compl y wit h th e limit s in th e rule . Ms . Koma n state d tha

t facilitie s ar

e no t require dt o compl y wit h th e MACT standar d unti l afte r th e final rule i s promulgated . Mr . Olse n aske dwhe n the rul e wouldb e proposed . Ms . Stru mreplie d the rule shoul

d b e proposedduring Novembe r 1999 . Ms . Elmor

e state dtha

t th e curren t MACT floors represen

t th e dat atha t EP A ha s gatheredthrough survey s an dtha t attendee s ar e welcom e t o offe r dat atha t the y fee l migh t aidi n th e setting of

th e MACT floors . Open Molding Source Approach - Existing Mr . Spaulding aske

d wha t EP A i s considering fo

r the definitio

n of corrosio n resistance . Ms . Strumstate d tha

t th e EP A ha s not developedadefinition a

t thi s time . Ms . Stru

maddedtha

t bot h the EP A and CF A have suggeste

d definition s to

# 

## one another , bu

t n o definitio n ha s been acceptabl e a t thi s point . 

# 3P. 5



## Madelein e Strum Octobe r 2 , 199 8 Pag e 4 Mr . Multane n asked abou t processe s tha

t ar e no t listed , suc h a s resi n pouring . Ms . Stru m state d tha t pourin g int

o a n ope n mol d wouldb e considere dmanua l ope n molding . Mr . Multanen expresse d concer

n tha t an y definition not

explicitly wordedi

n th e rul e coul db e misinterprete d by inspectors . Ms . Elmor

e suggested puttin g concern s an dsuggestion s int

o writin g andsubmitting , themthroug h th e trad e association . Ms . Elmor e addedtha

t EP A need s written documentatio n to) properl y tak e concern s int

o consideration . Mr . Kensington statedtha t definition s writte n b y peopl e unfamilia r wit h th e industr

y ma y no t b e accurate , s o th e chanc e to giv e feedbac k about th e definition s would b e beneficial . Mr . Colye r state dtha t EP A i s concernedabou

t proper definition s a s well , an d tha t suggestion s abou

t clarifying definition s wouldb e helpful . Mr . Mile s aske d i f th e rul e coul d b e modifie d o

r clarified afte

r th e final rul e wa s promulgated . Mr . Colye r replie d tha

t question s o n applicabilit

y o r interpretatio n ar

e sen t to EP A Regiona l Office s first

fo r arulin g and the n to EP

A Headquarters , if

necessary . Ms . Koma

n statedtha

t som e issue s ca

n b e handle d b y publishe d guidanc e material s an d other s b y technica l rul e revisions . Ms . Meye r indicate d tha

t definition s ca

n stil l b e clarified afte

r the rul e i s promulgated , bu t change s ar

e preferabl e befor

e promulgation . Mr . McNally expressed hi s strong concer n regardin g EPA' s decisio n to include adhesive s in the Plasti c Part s Surfac e Coating s MAC T Standar drathe r tha n th e ReinforcedPlastic s MACT Standard . Mr . McNally continued b y stating tha

t th e remova

l o f adhesive s fro

mth e scop e of

th e Reinforce d Plastic s Composite s MAC T i s problemati c fo

r the industry . Ms . Tea

l indicate dtha

t th e EP A grou p addressin g th e issu

e i s still collecting dat

aan d ha s no t ye t mad e afinal decisio n o n which MAC T standar d shoul d addres s adhesives . Severa l EP A representative s state dtha t informatio n i s bein g collecte d and suggestion s wouldb e welcome . Mr . McNall y indicate dtha

t no written comments wer

e necessar y an d th e EP A shoul d"jus t d o it. " Mr . Mile s indicatedtha t thi s issu e i s a

n importan t on e becaus e adhesive s ar

e being usedmor

e an dmor e in th e reinforcedplastic s industry . Ms . Stru masked ho w adhesive s ar

e applied . Mr . Mile s statedtha t th e adhesive s ar

e applie d using eithe r manua l or mechanica

l resin application . Mr . Mile s addedtha t th e mor e effective adhesive s generally contai n methy l methacrylate . Ms . Elmor e suggestedtha

t one possibl e wa

y to addres s adhesive s i s t

o creat e aseparat e subcategor

y fo r adhesive s i

n th e sam e wa y tha t EP A ha s create d a separat e subcategor

y fo r cleaning materials . Mr . Holtzcla

w indicated tha

t mos t adhesive s ar

e resin s i n past e for man dinquire da s to th e difference between aresin past e an d aresin . Mr . Mile s state

dtha t on e difference i s tha

t aresin past

e i s significantl

y mor e viscou s tha

n aresin i n liquidform . Mr . Hoo

dexpressedhi s concer

n tha t ther e ma y be difference s in th e wa

y tha t a n inspector

an dafacilit y defin e the differenc e between aresi n an d a n adhesiv e whic h coul d lea d t o complianc e problem s fo

r th e facility . Mr . Mile s state d tha t i t woul d b e undesirabl e fo

r afacilit y t o have t o compl y wit h anothe r MAC T standar dsimply becaus e the facilit y use d adhesives . Mr . Hoo dstatedtha

t complying wit

h aseparat

e MACT standar

d fo r adhesive s woul d resul t

i n a n inordinat e amoun t of extrawor k fo r afacilit y tha t onl y use s acoupl e o f tube s of adhesive s ayear . 

# 4P. 6



## Madeleine Stru

m Octobe r 2 , 199 8 Pag e 5 Point Value System Ms . Stru mexplaine d th e poin

t value syste

mbeing consideredfo

r ope n molding . Ms . Stru m pointe d out

tha t th e systemi s no t

astandar demissio n limi t

or a n emissio n factor . Ms . Strum explained tha

t th e goa l of th e syste mi s t o reflect th e overall effectivenes s of contro l methods . Ms . Stru mcontinued b

y stating tha

t averagin g i s allowedwithin th e 1 0 ope n molding proces s grouping s an d tha t a n effectivenes s tes t

fo r vapo r suppresse dresin s i s stil l being developedwit h the aido f

CF A representatives . Compliance Options Ms . Stru mstate d tha

t th e option s fo

r complianc e include lowe

r HA P conten t resins , non atomize d applications , add-o n contro l devices , vapo r suppresse dresins , an

dvacuu mbagging . Mr . McNall y aske d Ms . Stru

mwher e sh e ha dpersonally witnesse dth e vacuu mbagging process . Ms . Stru mindicate d tha

t she ha d witnessedvacuu

mbaggin g a

t aboa t manufacturing facility . Mr . McNall y asked if Ms . Stru mha d witnessedvacuu

mbaggin g a t afacilit y tha t i s par t of the Reinforced Plastic s sourc e category . Ms . Stru mrespondedin th e negativ e but addedtha t EP A representative s hav e calle d facilitie s in th e ReinforcedPlastic s sourc e categor y t o collec t information about

th e vacuumbaggin g process . Mr . McNall y askedfo r a n exampl e of

aproduct create dwit

h vacuum baggin g wher e th e vacuu

mba g i s appliedimmediatel

y afte r resi n application . Mr . Mile s provide d a n exampl e o f recreationa

l vehicle sidewal

l manufacturin

g wher e the vacuu

mba g i s applie dshortl y afte r resin application . Mr . McNall y state dtha t h e didnot kno w of to o man y application s wher

e th e ba g i s appliedimmediatel

y afte r the resi n i s appliedt

o the mold . Mr . McNall

y continuedby statin g tha t usuall y bleede r material s ar

e appliedfirst, the

n th e bag . Mr . McNall

y indicate dtha

t he would lik e t o kno w exactl

y ho w th e EP

A i s definin

g vacuu mbagging . Mr . Mile s aske

dMs . Stru mi f EPA' s definitio n of vacuu mbagging include

d th e placemen

t of bleede r materia l prior t o th e applicatio n of the bag . Ms . Stru

mresponde d i

n the affirmative . Mr . Holtzcla

w stated tha

t vacuu mbagging i s aprocess , no

t acontrol technology . Mr . Mile s replie d tha

t vacuu mbaggin g could b e considere dacontro l technolog y becaus e i t doe s resul t

i n closing the mol

d afte r th e application o

f resin . Mr . McNall

y statedtha

t vacuu mbaggin g i s don e fo

r reason s othe

r tha n reducing emissions . Mr . Mile s statedtha t afacilit y shoul dreceive credi

t fo r usin g vacuu mbaggin g eve

n i f i t wa s originall

y intende dfo

r purpose s othe

r tha n emissio n control . Mr . McNally inquire d whethe

r o r not applyin g avacuu mwa s necessar

y t o obtain credit . Ms . Procto r indicated tha

t th e successfu

l application of

avacuu mwouldprovide assuranc e tha t acomplet e sea l wa s achieved . Mr . Spaulding asked ho w aresin i s distribute dwit

h vacuu mbagging andwhethe

r roll-out i s allowe d withi n th e EPA' s definition o f vacuu mbagging . Ms . Stru

mindicate dtha

t th e EP A did not wan t to assig n the sam

e leve l o f credi t fo r vacuu mbagging which wouldb e don e afte r roll-ou t a s vacuu mbagging whic

h woul dbe don e withou t roll-out . Ms . Stru

mcontinue dby statin g tha t th e 45 % reductio n credi t

presentl y being assignedt

o vacuu mbagging i s fo

r vacuu mbaggin g 

# 5P. 7



## Madeleine Stru

m Octobe r 2,199 8 Pag e 6 withou t roll-out . Mr . Holtzcla

w statedtha

t th e applicatio n of

afilmt o th e mol d(afte

r resi n applicatio n an

d roll-out ) ma y represen t apotentia l contro l technolog y misse dby th e EPA . Severa l attendee s state d tha

t the y covere d th e filament

woun dpar t wit h aba g afte r filamen t windin g and state d tha t thi s was a

n emissio n reductio n techniqu e tha t shoul db e considere di n th e point valu e system . Ms . Procto

r asked ho w th e EP

A woul dassign a n emission reduction credi

t t o suc h acontro l technology withou

t an y data . Mr . Hoo

d state dtha t sinc e the appliedfil

mca n bloc k HA P emission s fro mescaping , the credi

t assigned to suc

h acontrol technique shouldb e simila r t o the credit

assigned t o vacuu mbagging . Mr . Holtzcla

w statedtha

t the emissio n reductio n credit shoul db e simila

r t o vapo r suppressed resins . Mr . Schweitze

r stated tha t he did no t believe tha

t an y companie s ar

e successfull

y using vapo

r suppressed resin s i

n corrosion resistant

application s requirin g secondar y bonding . Mr . Schweitze

r added tha t whe n making acorrosio n resistan t product , secondar

y bondin g problem s ofte

n prohibi t th e usag e o

f vapo r suppressed resins . Severa

l attendee s expresse dconcer n tha t th e point value s fo r th e corrosio n resistant

subcategorie s ar

e low enoug

h t o force companie s to us e vapor suppresse d resin s t o compl

y wit h th e standar

d whic h couldcaus e secondar

y bondin g problems . Ms . Proctor indicate d tha

t facilitie s i

n th e corrosio n grouping s d o no t hav e to us e VS Ran

dtha t ther e ar e n o facilitie s within the MAC

T floo r tha t ar e usin g VSR . Mr . Kensingto n askedabou t th e origi n of

th e vapo r suppresse d resin effectivenes s numbers . Ms . Stru mstatedtha

t th e 35 % effectivenes s credit fo r unfilled resin s cam

e fromtes t dataan dtha t test s of filled resin system s indicat

e tha t suppressant s i n filled system s ar

e generall y ineffective . Ms . Stru

madde dtha t th e standar

dwoul drequir e cas e b y cas e testin g t

o determine th e effectivenes s o f the vapo r suppressant s usedby individua l facilities . Mr . McNall

y questione d th e effectivenes s o f vapo r suppressant s i n reducin g methyl methacrylat e emissions . Mr . Holtzcla

w stated tha

t du e to secondar

y bondin g issues , corrosion resistan

t tank s an d fittings ofte

n have t o b e mad e fro mth e sam e material , making mixin g part s mad e fro mhighe r an d lowe r HA P resin s impossible . Mr . Olse n suggeste dtha t EP A pu t a n asteris k on the maximu

mpoin t value fo r mechanica

l application an

d not e tha t th e poin t value als o applie s t

o al l secondar y part s an d t o attachin g secondar

y part s to th e primar

y part , wher

e th e primar

y par t i s mad e b y mechanica

l application . Ms . Stru

mindicated tha

t th e facilitie s i

n the floor

fo r manua l operation s ar

e als o doing secondar y bonding an

d s o ther e i s no reason t

o separat e ou t secondar y bonding applications . Sh e adde d tha t sh e did not understan d th e issue sinc e ther e wer e facilitie s in th e floo

r fo r manua l operation s tha

t conduc t secondar y bonding . Ms . Koma

n statedtha

t asmall grou

p of peopl e shoul d loo k int o the secondar

y bondin g issu e further . Person s indicatin g they wouldparticipat e included : Joh n Schweitzer , Bil l Holtzclaw , Da n Boyd , an dNei l Olsen . Mr . Kensingto n state d tha t h e believedtha

t the dat afo r facilitie s settin g th e corrosio n resistan t floo r wer e incorrec t an d tha t EP A neede dt o visi t thes e facilities . EP

A explaine dtha

t th e facilitie s confirme

d the datain writing . Mr . Schweitze r als o state dtha

t he believe dth e datai

n th e databas e wer

e wrong . Afte

r additiona l discussion , i

t wa s agreedtha

t EP A wouldsen

dth e CF A th e



# <3 >P. 8



## Madeleine Stru

m Octobe r 2 , 199 8 Pag e 7 databas e wer

e wrong . Afte

r additiona l discussion , i

t was agreedtha

t EP A wouldsen

dth e CF A th e copie s o f contac t report s fo r companie s settin g the MAC T floo r s o tha t CF A coul drevie w th e information . Mr . DeBus k

asked wh y ther e i s adifferenc e in th e poin t valu e limi t

fo r filledandunfille d mechanica l resi n application . Ms . Stru mindicatedtha

t non-atomize dapplicatio n (pressure-fe d rollers , flow-coaters ) was no t consideredaviabl e control option fo r fille dresin system s an

dtherefor e the EP A decided t

o separat e unfille d an dfilled mechanica

l resin application . Ms . Stru madded tha

t test s done bot

h by CF A an d elsewher e have show

n tha t th e effectivenes s of

vapor suppressant s ar

e greatly reduce d i

n filled resin s a s comparedt o unfilledresins . Mr . DeBus k indicate dtha

t hi s compan y wa s applying afille

d resin syste

musing pressure-fe

drollers . Ms . Procto

r askedwha

t typ e of fille r wa s containe d in th e filled resi n syste mappliedwit

h pressure-fe drollers . Mr . DeBus k indicated tha

t th e fille r was aluminu

mtrihydrate . Ms . Procto

r indicate dtha

t i f filled resi n system s could b e applied wit

h non-atomized application , then it ma y b e possibl e fo

r th e EP A t o recombin e filled and unfille d mechanica l resi n application . Mr . DeBusk inquire dwh

y th e EP A had no t separate d filament

winding applicatio n int

o filledan dunfilledgroupings . Ms . Proctor responde d tha t ther e were ver

y fe w facilitie s i

n th e filament

winding databas e tha

t usedfilledresi n systems . Mr . DeBusk

responded tha

t approximatel

y 80 % o f the resin tha

t hi s facilit y usedto produc e filament woun d part s i s filled. Mr . Schweitze

r asked i f an y of the representative s i

n attendanc e knew i f

their facilitie s use d styren e fo r cleaning purposes . Mr . Multane n answere di n the affirmative , bu

t statedtha t the y reused the styrene afterward s i

n th e fabrication process . Mr . Multane n aske dif afacilit y reuse s styren

e afte r cleaning , i s thi s us e considere d cleaning o

r par t o f the fabricatio

n process . Mr . Schweitze

r stated tha t cleanin g wit

h styrene should no t

b e prohibite das long a s th e styrene i s reuse di n th e productio n process . Ms . Stru

mstated tha

t th e EP A wouldnee

dt o addres s thi s issue . Mr . Holtzcla

w asked abou

t th e propose drequiremen

t fo r mixer s t o b e completely covere d wit h no visibl e gap s aroun

d th e mixing shaft . Mr . Holtzcla w state dtha

t resin s wer

e ofte n mixed in 5 5 gallo n drum s wit

h the mixin g shaf

t going through th e bung hol e locate di n th e top of

th e 55

- gallon drum . Mr . Mile s indicated tha t alarg e numbe

r o f ge l coat s ar e als o mixedi

n 5 5 gallon drums . Mr . Holtzcla

w asked i f th e propose d standar

dfo r mixing woul dallo w fo

r avisibl e ga

p aroun d th e mixin g shaf t fo r thi s typ e of

mixing . Ms . Procto

r responde di n the negative an

daskedMr . Holtzcla

w i f facilitie s could sea

l the mixin g shaf t i n som e way . Mr . Holtzcla

w responde di

n th e negative . Mr . Kensington stated tha

t coverin g the mixe r i s goodenoug

h an dtha t arequiremen

t fo r n o visibl e gap s o r seal s i s no t

necessary . Mr . Spaulding askedi f the mixing cove

r requiremen

t coul db e change d t o "mostly covered " o

r "substantially covered " o

r "reasonable covered" . Ms . Elmor e state d tha

t thos e term s wer

e unenforceabl

e (due to being vague) an

dtha t an y cove r requiremen

t wouldhav e t o b e expresse d in enforceable terms . Mr . Spaulding askedif th e standar

dcoul db e writte n t

o allo w fo r acertain maximu

mga p size . Ms . Stru

mindicate dtha t th e EP A wouldinvestigat

e th e allowanc e

"= *P. 9



## Madelein e Strum Octobe r 2 , 199 8 Pag e 8

o f aga p betwee n th e mixing shaf

t an d th e mixe r cover . Ms . Stru

maskedwha

t siz e ga p woul d b e needed . Attendee s suggested allowing atwo-inc h gap , aon e an dahal f inch gap , or

ahal f inc h visibl e ga p aroun d th e mixe

r shaft , a s well a s determining a n allowabl e ga

p a s afacto

r of th e diamete r of th e mixe r shaft . Mr . DeBus

k statedtha t filler i s ofte n addeddurin g th e mixin g proces s and inquire d i f

th e standar

d would allo w th e mixe

r t o b e ope n whe n addin g filler. Ms . Procto r indicated tha

t th e curren t EP A approac h wouldallo w the mixe

r t o b e ope n fo r th e purpos e o f

adding materials . Mr . McNall

y stated tha

t the CF A ha s recommendedtha

t mixing vessel s wit

h les s tha n a25

- gallon capacit

y b e exempted fromamixe

r cove r requirement . Mr . McNall

y then inquiredi f

the EP A woul d provid e atechnica

l recommendation on ho w to supplan t small batc h mixer s tha

t hav e les s tha n 25 gallon s o f

capacit y o r i f the EP A wouldallo w asiz e cutoff . Ms . Stru mindicate dtha

t th e EP A coul d examin e whethe

r asiz e cutof

f fo r mixin g vessel s wa s warranted . Mr . Holtzcla w indicated manua

l mixing i n a5-gallo n pail i s acommo

n practic e i n industr y an dinquiredif

thi s typ e of mixing woul d requir

e acover . Ms . Stru

mindicatedtha

t th e EP A intendedto exemp

t han dmixing fro mthe mixing cove

r requirement . It

wa s inquire dwhethe

r han dmixing wit

h amotorize ddevic e suc h a s amixin g shaf

t o n adril l moto r wouldb e exempt . Ms . Stru manswere din th e negativ e an d state d tha t EP A woul d nee

d to develop adefinitio n of han dmixing . Mr . Holtzclaw asked if

EPA' s requiremen

t fo r coveredstorag e container s differentiate d betwee n whe n th e materia

l i s bein g use dan dwhe n the materia

l i s being stored . Ms . Meye r inquired i f thi s wa s a

n issu e tha

t EP A needed t

o clarify . Mr . Multane

n responde din th e affirmative . Mr . Multanen state d tha

t i n hi s facility , hi s employee s frequentl y us e small container s of

resi n whe n fabricating products . Mr . Multane n askedi f hi s employee s wouldhav e to cove r thos e container s wheneve r they se t th e containe

r down . Ms . Elmor

e suggestedtha

t on e wa y t o addres s th e issu e raise d b y Mr . Holtzcla

w an d Mr . Multanen wouldb e to se t amaximu

mlengt h of time tha t a container coul d b e uncovered . Mr . Kensingto n askedif ther e was asiz e cutof

f fo r th e covered storag e container

requirement . Ms . Stru

mresponde d i

n the negative . Mr . Kensingto n hel d u p a coffe e cu p and state d tha

t ther e wer e temporar y container s i

n us e a t hi s facilit y tha t wer e a s small a s th e coffe

e cu p he hel d i n hi s hand . Mr . Kensingto n als o statedtha t container s thi s small shoul d no t b e subject t o th e storag e containe

r requirement . Mr . McNall

y indicatedtha

t i t wa s unreasonable fo r th e EP A t o requir

e cover s o n smal l storag e containers . Mr . McNall y continue dby statin g tha

t thi s was especially tru e sinc e the CF A ha dsubmitte dt

o th e EP A emission s datatha

t indicate d tha

t HA P emission s fro

msmal l container s wer

e insignificant . Mr . Mile s state d tha

t industr y need s controlle dspraying i n orde r to mee t th e poin t valu e limit s require d by th e standard . Mr . Mile s state dtha t testin g ha s demonstrate dtha t controlle d sprayin g reduce s emission s an d tha t industr y shoul db e providedwit

h incentive s (in th e standard ) t o us e controlle d spraying . Mr . Mile s als o indicate dtha t controlle dsprayin g coul db e mad e enforceable . Mr . Multane

n inquire d wh y controlledspraying was not considere denforceable . Ms . 

# 8P.1 0



## Madelein e Stru m Octobe r 2 , 199 8 Pag e 9 Stru mindicate dtha t

th e CF A controlle d sprayin g progra mha d bee n rule d unenforceabl e b y EPA' s Offic e o f Enforcement . Ms . Stru madde d tha t operato r trainin g woul d b e include d a s par t o f th e standar da s arequire dwor k practice , but

controlle d sprayin g woul d not b e include d a s acontro l optio n i n th e poin t

valu e syste mfo

r ope n molding . Mr . Mile s state d tha t i f afacility wa s operatin g acontrolle dsprayin g progra mi n amanner simila r t o an IS O 900 0 typ e o f

quality assuranc e progra m tha t i t shoul db e enforceable . Mr . Schweitzer state d tha t

industry representative s shoul d b e allowe d t o presen t

t o EPA' s Offic e o f

Enforcemen t

amodifie d versio n o f

CFA' s progra mo f

controlle d sprayin g tha t

i s designe dt o addres s EPA' s enforceabilit y concerns . Ms . Meye r

inquire d a s t o whe n th e CF A woul dhav e amodifie dproposal read y t o presen t t o th e EPA , an d Mr . Schweitze r state d tha t h e woul dprovid e EP A with adat e b y Septembe r 22,199 8 whe n th e CFA woul d b e read y t o presen t amodifie dcontro l sprayin g proposal . Mr . Hoo draise daquestio n abou t th e ability o f

companie s t o mee t

MAC T standard s whil e under agovernmen t

contrac t requirin g the mt o us e particula r resins . Mr . Hoo d state d tha t th e U.S . Military an dgovernmenta l agencie s ofte n hav e specifi c requirement s for resin s use d i n fire-retardant applications . H e gav e a n exampl e o f buildin g cod e requirement s i n Lo s Angele s whic h requir e th e us e o f fire-proof

panels . H e sai dtha

t thes e panel s mus t

b e manufacture d fromClas s 1 fire retardan t resin s whic h hav e aHA P conten t hig h enoug h t o mak e the mdifficul t t o us e unde r

th e propose d MAC T standards . Ms . Koma n aske di f alis t o f thos e require d resin s coul d b e provide d t o EPA . Mr . Hoo dthe n aske dabou t

corrosio n resistan t

an d fire retardan t

resin s bein g interchangeabl e unde r th e propose drule . Ms . Procto r state dtha t

th e curren t

EP A approac h doe s not

conside r afire-retardant produc t o r applicatio n t o automaticall y b e acorrosio n resistan t produc t o r application . Mr . Hoo d state dtha t

i f thes e resin s coul db e classifie d i n th e corrosio n resistan t produc t grouping , th e hig h HA P conten t

woul dnot

caus e a s muc h o f

acomplianc e issu e for

facilitie s usin g th e resins . Mr . Hoo dinquire dabou t th e definitio n o f

corrosio n resistance . After adiscussio n o n commo n use s o f

thes e resin s an dth e possibility o f definin g corrosio n resistanc e base d o n chemistry , Ms . Procto r

state dtha t

th e definitio n o f

"corrosio n resistant " need s t o b e define d b y th e application . Mr . Multane n state dtha t

ther e ar e currentl y man y application s for highe r HA P corrosio n resistan t resin s i n non-corrosio n resistan t application s du e t o thei r hig h quality an d lo w shrinkage . Fo r example , certai n section s o f th e tu b an d showe r

unit s produce d b y Mr . Multanen' s compan y for a major hote l chai n ar e produce dusin g acorrosio n resistan t resin . Mr . Multane n adde d tha t changin g t o lowe r HA P corrosio n resistan t

resin s may not

b e economicall y feasible . Ms . Koma n asked tha t suc h situation s b e documente dan dsubmitte d t o EP A t o ai d i n th e economi c analysis . Ms . Koma n adde dtha t

an y compan y whic h doe s no t wan t th e informatio n t o b e publi c recor d ca n submi t i t a s confidentia l busines s information . Mr . Mile s aske dabou t

th e economi c impac t

analysis . Ms . Chappel l explaine d th e economi c impac t analysi s i s currentl y underway an d state d that informatio n tha

t woul d b e helpfu l i n th e costin g proces s include s annua l revenues , unit s produced , sale s figures , chang e i n sales , profi t margins , an d



# < ?P.1 1



## Madelein e Stru m Octobe r 2 , 199 8 Pag e 1 0
cost s o f switchin g materials . Sh e state d tha t i t woul d b e particularl y usefu l t o kno w i f th e MAC T standar dwoul dcaus e facilitie s t o chang e thei r produc t production . Som e manufacturer s agree d t o provid e thi s informatio n i f i t woul db e kep t

confidential . Ms . Chappel l agree d t o sen d alis t o f question s abou t

neede dfacility informatio n t o th e CFA . Mr . Spauldin g indicate dhi s belie f that resin s use d for

mol d manufacturin g shoul d b e groupe d wit h corrosio n resistan t

applications . H e state d tha t becaus e toolin g ge l coats wer e broke n ou t separatel y fromothe r

ge l coats , toolin g resin s shoul d b e broke n ou t separatel y fromothe r

resins . Mr . Spauldin g adde dtha t

i t woul db e unnecessary t o creat e anothe r process/produc t

groupin g fo r

mol d manufacturing . Mr . Hoo dstate dtha t isophthali c resin s wer e typicall y use d fo r mol d makin g an d thes e resin s require dhighe r HA P contents . Ms . Stru maske d i f viny l este r

resin s wer e eve r

use d i n th e industr y for

mol dmanufacturing . Mr . Spauldin g indicate d tha t viny l este r

resin s wer e occasionall y use db y th e industry . Ms . Stru mpointe d ou t tha t dat afro mth e boa t

manufacturin g industr y indicate dtha t

severa l boa t

facilitie s us e lo w HA P viny l este r resin s t o buil d molds . Mr . Multane n state dtha t

mold s ar e constantl y spraye d wit h chemical s tha t contai n styren e ( acorrosiv e chemical ) an da s suc h shoul db e considere d acorrosion-resistan t application . Ms . Stru mindicate d tha t sh e di dno t

se e adifferenc e betwee n aboa t mol d bein g spraye d with aresi n an d amol d use d t o produc e anon-boa t

product . Mr . DeBus k

aske dabou t

th e possibilit y o f

exemption s for

uniqu e products . H e sai d tha t Appalachia n Plastic s develope daproduc t with performanc e characteristic s tha t ca n onl y b e achieve d with amodifie dacryli c resi n tha t contain s 60 % HA P (mostl y methy l methacrylate. ) Mr . DeBus k state dthat currentl y th e facilit

y i s considere d amino r

source , bu t

with th e anticipate d growth for thi s product , i t coul dbecom e amajo r

source . Mr . DeBus k

state d tha t

h e coul d currentl y mak e th e uniqu e produc t unde r th e propose dstandar db

y averagin g i n anothe r

produc t tha t use s alo w HA P resin , bu t hi s continuin g ability t o d o s o woul ddepen d o n th e marke t for th e latte r product . Furthermore , Mr . DeBus k sai dtha t thi s highe r

HA P resi n had man y application s an d th e curren t requirement s woul d not allo w hi s company t o grow . Mr . DeBus k state d tha t

the y currentl y canno t

afford acontro l device . Mr . Noona n aske dwhethe r th e operatio n utilizin g th e 60 % b y weight HA P resi n wa s filled. Mr . DeBus k

state dtha t

it was highl y filled. Mr . Noona n sai d tha t th e proble mwa s EPA' s treatmen t o f filledresins . Mr . McNall y disagreed , indicatin g tha t thi s uniqu e produc t

wa s agoo d exampl e o f wher e th e industry wa s heade dan draise d th e questio n abou t ho w futur

e product s wit h similar

issue s woul db e addresse dunde r th e standard . Mr . McNall y adde d tha t h e fel t ther e i s n o MAC T floo r

fo r thi s industry . Ms . Meye r aske dMr . McNall y t o provid e arational e fo r thi s position . Man y attendee s expresse dconcern ove r Ake r Plastics , Inc . presenc e i n th e ge l coa t floo r becaus e o f

thei r us e o f alo w HA P ge l coa

t tha t i s no t applicabl e t o product s i n th e industry tha t nee d t o withstan dweathering . Ms . Procto r indicate d tha t

Coo k carrie s lo w HA P ge l coat s for othe r applications , for

example , marin e applications . Mr . Spauldin g indicate d tha t hi s Coo k Composite s Representativ e di dno t

recommen dthi s lo w HA P ge l coat . Mr . Schweitze r expresse d concer n ove r


# IOP.1 2



## Madelein e Stru

m Octobe r 2 , 199 8 Pag e 1 1 using information fromsuppliers fo r regulator y development . H

e statedtha

t suppliers ofte

n indicat e the y have ane

w product befor e al l of the problem s have bee

n worke dou t an dtha t supplier s hav e ha

d to pull paper s the

y have prepared fromconference s a t the las t minut e becaus e their

produc t wa s no t ready . Mr . Hoo d state d tha t h e di d no t believ e tha

t th e 24.3 % gel coa

t mad e by Coo k Composite s wa s widel y availabl e to all companies . H e saidtha t hi s distributor

doe s no t hav e thi s gel coat . Mr . Multane n state d tha

t som e companie s ma

y have specia

l relationship s wit

h resin andgel coa

t manufacturer s an

d distributor s which allo w the mto purchas e awide

r selectio n o f

resin s an d gel coat s a t alowe r cost . Mr . Schweitze

r statedtha t he believedmos t

lo w HA P ge l coat s t o stil l b e unde r developmen

t or inaccessible to man

y companies . Ms . Procto

r indicate dtha

t sh e woul d chec k bac k on th e availabilit

y o f th e Coo k lo w HA P ge l coa t an ddiscus s whethe

r th e compan

y recommend s tha

t th e low HA

P marine ge

l coa t no t b e used . Mr . Mar k Ake r spok e abou t hi s experienc e wit

h th e lo w HA

P gel coat . H

e state dtha

t Ake r Plastic s use s mor

e tha n 3,000,00 0 pound s pe

r yea r an d have bee n using th e low HA

P ge l coa t fo r tw o years . Mr . Ake

r continued b

y statin g tha

t i t initially took

six month s t

o adjus t t o the new gel coat . Mr . Ake r added tha t althoug h the gel coa

t cost s mor e pe r pound , les s i s neededt

o produc e products , thu s actuall

y reducing overal

l production costs . Mr . Ake r als o statedtha

t th e application o

f thi s resin mus t b e controlle d to athicknes s o f 3 mil s i n orde r t o b e cos t effective . Man

y attendee s state d tha

t the y would no t

b e abl e t o achiev e tha

t tigh t o f aspecification . Mr . Ake

r conclude dby statin g tha

t h e could not

sa y tha t thei r low HA P ge l coa t woul dwor k fo r al l companie s but

tha t he als o fel

t tha t som e companie s i

n the industr

y wer e simpl y goin g t o have to "ste

p u p to th e plate " an

dtr y th e new lo w HA P ge l coat s an d resins . Mr . Naylo

r sai dtha t i t i s possible tha

t companie s tha

t mak e repetitiv e product s ma

y b e a t a n advantag e whe

n changin g thei r ge l coats t o lowe r HA P versions . Mr . Naylo r added tha t if acompan y make s avariet

y o f products wit

h differen t require dphysica

l propertie s tha

t it woul d hav e to tes t

ou t awide r variet y o f low-HA P ge l coat s (i n orde

r t o obtain th e require d produc t properties ) an

d thu s coul d encounte

r additiona l cost s o r technica l difficulties . Attendee s identified thi s a s asmal

l busines s issue , noting tha

t whil e abi g compan

y lik e Ake r woul dhav e th e technical resource s t

o mak e the lo w HA

P ge l coa t work , smal

l businesse s d

o not hav e resource s neede d to d

o this . The

y als o note d tha

t thi s was acustomproduct

versu s repetitiv e produc t

issue , in tha t facilitie s making repetitiv e product s wouldb e mor e focuse do n th e on

e produc t an d coul d devot e th e resource s t

o tha t product .



# uP.1 3



## Madelein e Stru m Octobe r 2 , 199 8 Pag e 1 2

Actio n Item s for

Industr y Representatives : 1 . B y Septembe r

22 , wil l giv e adat e b y whic h proposa l t o addres s concern s abou t th e controlle d sprayin g complianc e optio n wil l b e completed . 2 . Repor t

o f industry grou p o n secondary bondin g issue s durin g th e wee k o f Septembe r

22 . 3 . Submi t

specifi c informatio n regardin g concern s an d suggestion s t o EP A directl y o r throug h CFA . Helpfu l informatio n includes : annua l revenues , unit s produced , sale s figures , chang e i n sales , profi t margins , cost s o f

switchin g materials . 4 . Provid e example s o f governmen t

specification s o r

requirement s for

us e o f certai n highe r HA P resins . Actio n Item s for

EPA : 1 . Pos t

meetin g summary o n th e web . 2 . Pos t

averagin g exampl e o n th e we b tha t illustrate s th e averagin g allowe d betwee n th e process/produc t

grouping s o f

th e ope n moldin g subcategory . Afte r further thought , th e EP A decide dtha t

sinc e thi s exampl e i s no t self-explanator

y an d tha t

i t woul d b e counte r productiv e t o includ e i t o n th e website . However , th e EP A wil l giv e a n averagin g demonstratio n at

th e CFA' s Annua l Conventio n o n Octobe r 23 , 1998 . 3 . Sen dcontac t

report s t o CFA . (Sen t

Septembe r

21,1998 ) 4 . Reinvestigat e controlle dsprayin g with th e Offic e o f Enforcemen t

an d Complianc e Assuranc e (OECA ) whe n th e ne w informatio n i s receive d fro mth e CFA . (CF A informatio n was sen t t o OEC A o n Octobe r

2 , 1998 ) 5 . Explor e secondary bondin g issu e wit h smal l grou p identifie d a t meeting . (Additional 1 

## informatio n requeste dfro mCF A Octobe r 5 , 1998 ) 6 . Sen dlis t

o f economi c question s t o CF A t o assis t EP A i n economi c impac t analysis . 

# \ZP.1 4 

# ^•fJa'hMSni

I
DRAF T 8/20/9 8 SMAL L BUSINES S OPE N MOLDING OUTREAC H MEETIN G SEPTEMBE

R11,199 8 MEETING AGEND

A WELCOM

E AND INTRODUCTION S 9:00a m- 9:30a m W e wil l g o aroun dth e rooman dparticipant s wil l stat

e thei r names , affiliation , alittl e abou t thei r rol e i n th e organizatio n (i f

it s atrad e grou

p o r EPA ) or typ e o f busines s they hav e (fo

r smal l busines s participants ) GOAL S AND OBJECTIVE S 9:30a m-10:00a m EP A rul e developmen t

staf f wil l shar e thei r goal s an d objective s fo

r th e meeting . We wil l als o ask meetin g participant s t o shar e thei r

goal s an dobjectives . W

e wil l recor

d their inpu t an d attemp t t o addres s thes e goal s an dobjective s throughout th e day . BRIEFIN G O N TH E MAC T RUL E DEVELOPMEN

T 10:00a

m- 11:00a

m AN D THE REQUIREMENT S CURRENTL Y BEIN G CONSIDERE

D FO RPROPOSA

L Th e EP A rul e development

projec t lea dwill giv e abriefin g regardin g rul e development , status , an d th e requirement s bein g considered . Ther e wil l b e aQ&

A sessio n immediately following . Question s ma y als o b e aske ddurin g th e presentation . BREA K 11:00am

- 11:15a m SMAL L BUSINES S FEEDBAC K INCLUDIN

G 11:15a m- 12:30p

m DISCUSSIO N O F EMISSION REDUCTIO N TECHNIQUES BEING CONSIDERED AND/ORUSE D W e wil l g o aroun dth e roo

man dgiv e everyone a

n opportunit

y to speak . W

e wil l recor

d informatio n o n fli p charts . LUNCH I N EP A CAFETERI

A 12:30p m- 1:30p m AVERAGING DEMONSTRATION 1:30p m- 2:00p m W e wil l sho w ho w averagin g acros s th e variou s process/produc t grouping s ca

n b e use d t o mee t

th e open moldin g requirement s bein g considered . REVIE W O F FEEDBACK/IDEA S 2:00pm- 3:00p m



# 1 5P.1 5



## DRAFT : 8/20/9 8 

# Goal s an

d Objective s

• Provid e information t o small businesse s potentiall y affecte

d b y th e reinforce d plastic s MACT standar

d Lega l requirement s an d backgroun d Statu s o f MAC T developmen t EPA' s approac h fo

r developin g MAC T fo r existin g ope n moldin g source s MAC T standard s bein g considere dfor existin g ope n moldin g source s Averagin g withi n ope n moldin g


# • Obtai n feedbac

k fromsmall businesse s o n th e MACT standard s bein g considere d fo

r ope n moldin g Discus s smal l businesses ' operations , pollutio n prevention/emissio n reductio n experience s Liste n t o smal l businesses ' reaction s t o th e standard s bein g considere d Collec t idea s t o minimiz e cos t

impact s fo r smal l businesses , whil e stil l meetin g legal requirement s andobjective s



# AP.1 6 

# // A th mm /

'S

REINFORCED PLASTIC S MAC T STANDARD S DEVELOPMEN T FOR EXISTIN G OPE

N MOLDIN

G SOURCE S

Briefing Package forOutreach Meeting with Small

Businesses September 11,199 8 Madelein e Strum

, Projec tLea d Offic e o f Ai r Qualit

y Planning an

d Standard

s Emissio n Standard

s Divisio n Coating s and Consume

r Product s Grou p
DRAFT : 9/10/9 1



## Outlin e Lega l requirements an

d backgroun

d Status o f reinforced plastics MAC

T developmen t EPA' s approac

h fo r developin g MAC T fo r existin g ope n molding source s MAC T standards being considere d for existin g ope n molding sources

DRAFT: Ilium



# >5 >

## Lega l Requirement

s an d Backgroun

d Lega l Requirement s • MAC T = "maximu

m achievabl e contro

l technology. " Thi s ter

m i s commonly use d to describ e the standard

s mandate d b y sectio n 11 2 o f

the Clea n Ai r Ac t
• La w contains a lis to f

hazardou s ai r pollutant s (HAP ) tha

tth e EP A i s mandate

d to regulat e (e.g. , styrene , methyl methacrylate , others )
• La w require s EP A to lis tindustr

y categorie s o f

major source s o f

HA P (major : potentia

l t o emit1 0 ton s pe

r yea r o f a singl e HA P o r 2 3 o f

a combinatio n o f HAP ) an d develo p MAC T standard s fo r the m • EP A liste d mor

e tha n 20 0 majo

r sourc e categories - - Reinforced Plastic s Composite s Productio

n i s on e o f

the m
DRAFT : 9/IIV9 I

Standard s Developmen t

• La w prescribes the minimu

m leve l o f stringenc y o f the standard, denote d a s th e "MACT floor "
• Stringenc

y ca n b e differen

tfo r ne w versus existin g source s • Fo r existin g sources :

- th e MAC T floo r i s th e averag e o f th e bes t performin g 1 2 percen to f th e existin g source s i f there ar e 3 0 o r more source s i n th e categor y o r subcategor y

- th e MAC T floo r i s th e averag e o f th e bes t performin g 5 source s i f

ther e ar e les s than 3 0 source s in th e categor y o r subcategor y

- ih e averag e o f

th e bes tperformin g source s ca n b e th e mea n o r th e media n • Subcategories ca

n b e based o n classes , types , an d size s o f source s

DRAFT : 9/IU/9 8


# KPP.1 8

Differen tsubcategorie s ca

n have differen

t floor s ~ canno tallo w sources t o averag e acros s subcategories MAC T floor for ne w sources i s th e leve l o f emissio n control tha

ti s achieve d in practic e b y the bes tcontrolle

d similar sourc e Timin g • Thi s MAC T standar

d i s du e i n th e year 200 0 (proposa

l i s usuall y a yea r before rule i s final )
• Complianc

e dat e established b

y rule , bu t generall y can b e n o mor

e tha n 3 years afte

r rule i s fina

l

DRAFT : 9/IIV9 I



## Statu s o f MAC T Standar d Developmen

t Stil l in pre-proposa

l rul e development phase . Subcategories currentl

y being considere d are :

- ope n moldin g

- close d molding

- polyme r casting

- pultrusio

n

- continuous lamination/casting

- SM C manufacturin

g

- equipmen

tcleaning

- mixin g o f HAP-containing material s

- storag e o f HAP-containin

g material s MACT floor

s hav e bee n calculate d Costdat a t o determin

e economi c impact

s hav e bee n collecte d an

d costs ar e bein g compute d

DRAFT : 9/ltVJ t



# i l lP.1 9

EPA' s Approac h fo r Developin g MAC T fo r Existin g Ope n Moldin g Source s Currently , th e ope n moldin g subcategory ha s bee n broke n out

int o process/produc t groupings , fo

r whic h individua l MAC T floor s hav e bee n establishe d Lates t approac h t o determin e MAC T floor s i s th e us e o f

a"poin t value " syste m involvin g averagin g Thi s typ e o f

a n approac h wa s suggeste d b y industr y representative s i n Septembe r 199 7

DRAFT : 9/IIW S

Th e Ope n Moldin g Product/Proces s Groupin g Currentl

y Bein g Considere d Are :

• Mechanical resi n operation s (e.g. , spray gun s tha t atomize , flo w coaters , pressure fe drollers )

- corrosio n

- no n corrosio n fille d

- no n corrosio n unfille d • Manua l resi n operation s (e.g. , bucket-and

brush , bucket-and-tool )

- corrosio n

- non corrosio n • Filamen t

winding/centrifugal castin g

- corrosio n

- non corrosio n • Ge l coa t operation s

- toolin g

- clea r

- pigmente d

DRAFT : 9/IUfl l



# l&P.2 0



### Wha t i s aPoint Valu e System ?
I ti s a metho d t o combine specifi c emissio n reduction technique s int

o a numeric standar d The poiri tvalu e determine

s the extentt o which emissio n reduction techniques ar e employe d & thei r combined effectivenes s A poin tvalu e limiti s nota

n emissio n limi t A MAC T pointvalu e limiti s determine d for eac h product/proces s groupin g withi n th e open moldin g subcategor y Facilitie s tha

thav e mor

e tha n on e product/proces s grouping ca n averag e

DRAFT : 9/III/9 J

Question : How d o I kno w i f

I a m meeting the poin

t value limit(s ) in the MACT standard ? Answer : Plu g in you r HA

P content, application method an

d other emissio n reduction technique s int

o th e MAC T Mode

l Mode l consist s o f

equations for : • atomized resin (mechanical )
• non-atomize d resi n (mechanica l o r manual )
• filamen

twinding/centrifuga

l casting • ge l coa t Mode l wil l contai n method

s t o incorporate :

- vapo r suppresse d resin s (VSR )

- vacuu m baggin g

- add-o n contro l
DRAFT : 9/IUI9 I 

# ftP.2 1

Th e emissio n reductio

n technique s bein g considered i n th e mode l are :

- lowe r HA P resin s an d ge l coat s

- no n atomize d resi n applicatio n technolog y

- vapo r suppresse d resin s (VSR )

- vacuu m baggin g (immediatel y afte r resi n application )

- add-o n contro l devic e Yo u ma y need t o d o mor

e tha n on e o f th e above t o mee tthe limit s We ar e plannin g t o incorporat

e a procedur

e int o th e rul e which wil l allo w yo u t o us e other enforceable emissio n reductio n techniques which ar

e notaddressed b y th e poin tvalu e system

DRAFT : 9/111/9 1



### Poin t Value SystemSummar

y Eac h product/process grouping wil l hav e a MAC T poin

tvalue "limit " Us e MAC T mode l t o determin

e i f you r emissio n reductio

n technique s mee tth e poin tvalu e limit s Facilit y ha s the optio n t

o meeta weighte d averag e limitfor al l o f

its product/proces s grouping s o n a time-averaged basi s (1 2 month s rolling average)

DRAFT : 9/I1K9I



# "2JOP.2 2



### MAC T Standard s Bein g Considered fo r Existin g Open Moldin g Sources Wha t ar e th e MAC T poin t

valu e limit

s an d som e correspondin g potentia

l complianc e option

s fo r th e ope n molding process/produc

tgroupings ?

DRAFT : 9/l(V9 »

Th e followin g note s appl y t o th e complianc e

option s listed :
• Al l % HA

P limit s ar e i n term s o f % by weigh t an d ar e base d o n th e HAP conten

to f th e nea t resin an d an y added HA P (fille r no

tincluded )

• VS Reffectivenes s i s assume d t o b e 35 % excep t fo r filled resins where i ti s assume d to b e 0 . Fo r MAC T compliance purpose s a VS R effectivenes s tes tneed s to b e conducted . Therefore, HA

P contents presente

d in compliance option s wit

h VS Rar e approximate . Th e actua l HAP contentallowe d wil l b e based o n th e result s o f the effectivenes s test.

• Vacuu m baggin g effectivenes s i s assume d t o b e 45% . Thi s wil l b e furthe

r investigated . Therefore , HA

P content s presented in compliance option s wit

h vacuu m bagging coul d change .

DRAFT : 9/KI/9 I



# VLP.2 3

Mechanica

l Resi n Operation

s

- no n corrosion unfille

d point value = 9 0 pound s o f

HAP/to n o f resi n use d Som e complianc e option s tha

twill mee tth e abov e poin t value : 28. 1 % HA

P an datomize do r 36.0 % HA P an dnon-atomize d o

r 33.1 % HA P an datomizedwit

h VS Ro r 43.6 % HA

P an dnon-atomize

d wit h VS Ro r 35.3 % HA P an datomized wit

h vacuu m baggin g o r 46.9 % HA P an dnon-atomize d wit

h vacuu m baggin g

DRAFT : 9/11V98

Mechanica

l Resi n Operation

s (continued )

- no n corrosion filled poin t value - 16

0 pound s o f

HAP/to n o f resi n use d Som e complianc e option s tha

t wil l mee tthe abov e poin t value : 35.0 % HA P an d atomize do r 44.0 % HA P an datomize dwit

h vacuu m baggin g o r dependin g o

n VS Reffectivenes s fo r fille dresins , ther

e ma y also be a highe

r HA P resi n optio n wit

h the us e o f VS R

DRAFT : 9/II19 I



# £2 -P.2 4

Mechanica l Resi n Operation s (concluded )

Corrosio n poin tvalu e = 16 0 pound s o f HAP/to n o f

resi n use d Som e complianc e option s tha twil l mee tth e abov e poin tvalue : 35.0 % HA P an d atomize d o r 46.4 % HA P an d non-atomize d o r 41.3 % HA P an d atomize d wit h VS Ro r 56.3 % HA P an d non-atomize d wit h VS Ro r 44.0 % HA P an d atomize d with vacuu m baggin g o r 60.5 % HA P an d non-atomize d with vacuu m baggin g

DRAFT : 9/1CW

J

Manual Resi n Operation s

- no n corrosio n poin tvalu e = 7 1 pound s o f HAP/to n o f

resi n use d Som e complianc e option s tha twil l mee tth e abov e poin tvalue : 32.3 % HA P o r 39.1 % HA P wit h VS Ro r 42.1 % HA P with vacuu m baggin g

- corrosio n poin tvalu e = 8 5 pound s o f HAP/to n o f

resi n use d Som e complianc e option s tha twil l mee tth e abov e poin tvalue : 35.0 % HA P o r 42.4 % HA P wit h VS Ro r 45.6 % HA P with vacuu m baggin g

DRAFT : 9/IOT I



# 12>Filamen tWinding/Centrifuga

l Castin g

- no n corrosio n poin tvalu e = 13 0 pound s o f HAP/to n o f

resi n use d Som e complianc e option s thatwil l mee tth e abov e poin tvalue : 35.0 % HA P o r 48.8 % HA P wit h VS R

- corrosio n poin tvalu e = 14 8 pound s o f HAP/to n o f

resi n use d Som e complianc e option s thatwil l mee tth e abov e poin tvalue : 38.7 % HA P o r 54.0 % HA P wit h VS R

DRAFT : MUS I

Ge l Coatin g

- clea r productio n poin tvalu e = 51 8 pound s o f HAP/to n o f

ge l coa tuse d A complianc e optio n tha twil l mee tth e abov e poin tvalue : 44.0 % HA P

- pigmente d productio n poin tvalu e =

• 27 4 pound s o f

HAP/to n o f

ge l coa tuse d A complianc e optio n tha twil l mee tth e abov e poin tvalue : 31.2 % HA P

DRAFT : 9/lltt t



### • 

# -2-

4 P.2 5 J 1



# t oP.2 6

Ge l Coatin g (concluded ) Toolin g poin tvalu e = 43 1 pound

s o f HAP/to n o f ge l coa tuse d A complianc

e optio n tha twil l mee tth e abov e poin tvalue : 39.8 % HA

P

DRAFT : 9/1IV9 I



### Reinforce d plastic s MAC T standar d wil l als o addres s ancillary emissio n point s

• Cleaning : potentia l requiremen twil l b e thatcleanin g material s contai n n o HA P

• Mixin g o f

HAP-containin g materials : potentia l requiremen twil l b e tha tmixer s ar e t o b e close d o r covere d durin g mixin g (excep twhe n material s ar e adde d o r remove d fro m th e vessel ) suc h tha tther e ar e n o visibl e gap s an d ther e i s n o activ e ventin g

• Storag e o f

HAP-containin g materials : potentia l requiremen twil l b e tha t container s ar e t o b e covere d (excep twhe n material s ar

e adde d o r remove d fro m th e vessel )

DRAFT : WHW I



### 1 1 

# (LOEP A MAC T Mode l Poin t Values 1

HA P Conten t (%bywL ) 26. 0 27. 0 28. 0 29. 0 30. 0 31. 0 32. 0 33. 0 34. 0 35. 0 36. 0 37. 0 38. 0 39. 0 40. 0 41. 0 42. 0 43. 0 44. 0 45. 0 46. 0 47. 0 48. 0 49. 0 50. 0 Manua l Resi n Applicatio n

(Han d Lay-Up/Bucke t & Too l Application ) Non-Vapo r Suppresse d 4 3 4 7 5 1 5 5 6 0 6 4 6 9 7 4 7 9 8 5 9 0 9 6 10 2 10 8 11 4 12 1 12 8 13 5 14 2 14 9 15 7 16 5 17 3 18 1 18 9 Vapo r

Suppresse d 2 8 3 1 3 3 3 6 3 9 4 2 4 5 4 8 5 2 5 5 5 9 6 2 6 6 7 0 7 4 7 9 8 3 8 7 9 2 9 7 10 2 10 7 11 2 11 7 12 3 Vacuu m

Baggin g 2 4 2 6 2 8 30 3 3 3 5 3 8 4 1 4 4 4 7 50 5 3 5 6 5 9 6 3 6 6 7 0 7 4 7 8 8 2 8 6 9 0 9 5 9 9 10 4 Mechanica l Resi n Applicatio n Atomize d Applicatio n Non-Vapo r Suppresse d 7

_ 4 8 1 8 9 9 6 10 7 11 7 12 7 13 7 14 9 .160 17 3 18 5 19 9 21 3 22 7 24 3 25 8 27 5 29 2 30 9 32 8 34 7 36 6 38 7 40 7 Vapo r

Suppresse d 4 8 5 3 5 8 6 4 70 7 6 8 2 8 9 9 7 10 4 11 2 12 1 12 9 13 8 14 8 15 8 16 8 17 9 19 0 20 1 21 3 22 5 23 8 25 1 26 5 Vacuu m 3 Baggin g 4 1 4 5 4 9 5 4 5 9 6 4 7 0 7 6 8 2 8 8 9 5 10 2 10 9 11 7 12 5 13 3 14 2 15 1 16 0 17 0 18 0 19 1 20 1 21 3 22 4 Non-Atomize d Applicatio n

Non-Vapo r Suppresse d 4 3 4 7 5 1 5 5 6 0 6 4 6 9 7 4 7 9 8 5 90 9 6 10 2 10 8 11 4 12 1 12 8 13 5 14 2 14 9 15 7 16 5 17 3 18 1 18 9 Vapo r

Suppresse d 2 8 3 1 3 3 3 6 3 9 4 2 4 5 4 8 5 2 5 5 5 9 6 2 6 6 7 0 7 4 7 9 8 3 8 7 9 2 9 7 10 2 10 7 11 2 11 7 12 3 Vacuu m

Baggin g 2 4 2 6 2 8 3 0 3 3 3 5 3 8 4 1 4 4 4 7 5 0 5 3 5 6 5 9 6 3 6 6 7 0 7 4 7 8 8 2 8 6 9 0 9 5 9 9 10 4 Filamen t Winding /

Centifuga l Castin g Non-Vapo r Suppresse d 8 8 9 3 9 7 10 2 10 6 11 1 11 6 12 0 12 5 13 0 13 5 13 9 14 4 14 9 15 4 15 9 16 4 16 9 17 5 18 0 18 5 19 0 19 5 20 1 20 6 Vapo r

Suppresse d 5 7 6 0 6 3 6 6 6 9 7 2 7 5 7 8 8 1 8 4 8 7 9 1 9 4 9 7 10 0 10 4 10 7 11 0 11 3 11 7 12 0 12 4 12 7 13 0 13 4 Ge l Coa t

Applicatio n Atomize d Applicatio n 19 4 20 8 22 2 23 7 25 3 26 9 28 6 30 2 32 0 33 8 35 6 37 5 39 4 41 3 43 3 45 4 47 5 49 6 51 8 54 0 56 3 58 6 61 0 63 4 65 8 Not e 1 : MAC T Mode l poin t value s ar e i n units o f pound s o

f HA P pe r to n of resi n o r ge l coa t Not e 2 : Th e MAC T Mode l poin t value s show n fo r vapo r suppresse d resin s applie d b y manua l resi n application , mechanica l resi n application , an d filament winding/centrifuga l castin g ar e applicabl e fo r unfille d resi n system s only . I n th e cas e o f fille d resi n systems , th e non-vapo r suppresse d poin t value s shoul d b e used , regardles s o f whethe r o r no t th e resi n syste m contain s a vapo r suppressan t Th e poin t value s show n fo r vapo r suppresse d resin s assum e a 35 % reductio n i n emission s whe n a vapo r suppresse d resi n i s use d i n a n unfille d resi n system . Th e poin t value s fo r a vapo r suppresse d resi n use d b y a facilit y t o compl y wit h th e MAC T standar d wil l b e obtaine d fro m a n equatio n tha t use s result s of a laborator y tes t conducte d o n th e facility' s vapo r suppresse d resin . Not e 3 : Th e MAC T Mode l poin t value s show n fo r application s wit h vacuu m baggin g assume d tha t th e us e o f vacuu m baggin g reduce d HA P emission s b y 45 % whe n th e ba g an d vacuu m wer e applie d t o th e mol d immediatel y afte r th e applicatio n o f th e resi n an d n o roll-ou t of th e applie d resi n occurred . EP A ma y modif y th e vacuu m baggin g credi t use d t o generat e th e MAC T Mode l poin t value s show n abov e t o reflect mor

e recen t emission s dat a afte r furthe r study . Therefore , th e vacuu m baggin g poin t value s show n abov e ar e subject t o change .P.2 8



# Averagin g withi n Ope n Moldin g Facilitie s doin g bette r

tha n th e poin t

valu e limi t i n on e open moldin g product/proces s groupin g ca

n averag e with another product/proces s groupin g tha t exceed s th e poin t valu e limit . Standar d i s me t i f weighte d averag e poin t

valu e limit s ar e met . Averagin g wil l b e over

a12-mont

h rollin g period . That

means , every month , yo u ca n comput e you r

poin t value(s ) b y takin g th e previou s 1 2 month s o f

resi n an d ge l coat data .

£ 7P.2 9



## Corrosio n - Resistan t Manua l Resi n Applicatio n Draf t Summar

y Tabl e (09/04/98 ) Importan t Notes : 1 ) Th e poin t value s use d i n thi s summar y tabl e shoul d no t b e use d t o determin e actua l emission s a t a specifi c facility . Th e poin t valu e approac h doe s not take Int o accoun t al l o f th e variou s parameter s tha t ca n affect e specifi c facility' s emissions . (2 ) Thi s databas e onl y contain s facilitie s fo r whic h th e Administrato r ha s information . Othe r facilitie s tha t shoul d b e par t o f thi s databas e ma y exis t (3 ) Fo r th e purpos e o f thi s summar y table , vapo r suppresse d resin s (VSR ) wer e assume d t o reduc e emission s by 35% . Th e poin t valu e fo r a VS R use d by a facilit y t o compl y wit h th e MAC T standar d wil l b e obtaine d fro m a n equatio n tha t use s results o f a laborator y tes t conducte d o n th e facility' s vapo r suppresse d resin .

Ban k 1 2 3 4 5 B 0 7 8 9 1 0 1 1 1 2 1 3 1 4 1 5 1 6 1 7 1 8 1 9 20 2 1 2 2 23 2 4 2 5 2 7 29 30 3 1 3 2 3 3 3 4 3 5 3 6 3 7 38 3 9 4 0 4 2

aoTh e atthef i b»Poi i Plan t Name. ' x Weighte d Averag e % HA P I n nea t resi n plu s a

Velasc o Scal e Co . (Plastic s Oiv. ) I 38. 7 Resolit e I 39. 0 Hartze U Fan , Inc . (Bld g 275 ) 1 . M . Penna , Inc . Magnu m Plastics , Inc . Beetl e Plastics , Inc . 40. 0 40. 0 40. 0 41. 0

Industria l Linings , Inc . AB C Industries , Inc . (Gran d Junction , CO ) AB C Industries , Inc . (Wallace , ID ) AB C Industries , Inc . (Winon a Lake , IN ) Appalachia n Plastics , Inc . Fibercas t Co . Fibergrat a Corp . Rave n Industries , Inc . (Siou x Falls ) Rubbe r & Plasti c Applicator s Smit h Fiberglas s Products , Inc . (Littl e Rock ) Xerxe s Corp . (Avon ) 42. 0 43. 4 • •;... • :43. 4

• • •43.4 , • . ' • . 'SiRaWK^ssBSS'S s *«mS43;4::«S:5S«| S •?8feS8^4SBMBS ;, 8! ; • '43.4 : • • 43. 4 • SffiS§M434#gf*S & iSljl§iS^i&^Ha@ # MAC T Mode l Poin t Vahi e (befor e MACT ) (IbsAonL b 7 9 6 5 8 5 10 8 10 8 11 4 11 4 11 4 12 1 128 12 8 128 12 8 12 8 13 7 137 13 7 13 7 13 7 13 7 13 7 13 7 13 7 13 7 Hasting s Reinforce d Plastics-Viate c (Hastings ) | 44. 4 J 14 5 Owens-Comin g (Moun t Union ) Owens-Comin g Tank s (Valparaiso ) Peterso n Product s Picken' s Plastics , Inc . 45. 0 45. 0 45. 0 45. 0
Internationa l Reinforce d Plastic s Nov a Group , Inc . Parkso n Aeratio n & Fibergla s Corp. . Inc . Ne wEnglan d Plasti c Coate d Products , Inc . MF G Justi n Tanks . Inc . Ashwort h Plasti c Product s 46. 0 46. 0 46. 3 46. 7 48. 9 50. 0 14 9 14 9 14 9 14 9 15 1 15 6 15 7 15 7 15 9 162 180 189 Beden-Bsug h Products , Inc . | 56. 9 [ 25 3 Average : Legend : Assumed'values-'Nb'dat a pro w
Footnotes : HA P percentage s ar e i n tenn s o f weigh t percen t an d the y ar e base d o n th e HA P o jcjlit y (filler s no

t included) , i t value s er e expresse d a s pound s o f HA P pe r to n o f nea t resi n plus . Other;.:'' ' Emissio n Reductio n Technique s :



### _^_^_^_^_^_l__^_^_^_^_^_^_ ^ 

## B__^_^_^_^_^9_^_^_^_^_^_H n

43. 4

onten t o f th e nea t resi n plu s i

1 

# 26 1

m y HA P tha t i s adde d lot h e resi nP.3 0



## Noncorrosio n - Resistan t Manua l Resi n Applicatio n Draf t Summar

y Tabl e (09/04/98 ) Importan t Notes : (1 ) Th e poin t value s use d I n thi s summary tabl e shoul d no t b e use d t o determin e actua l emission s at a spedfi c fecOity. Th e poin t valu e approac h doe s no t tak e Int o accoun t al l o f fh e variou s pararmter e tha t ca n affe d a specifi c facBiy s emissions . (2)TO*a_ab_*oritycorttairufaeBtiesfwwtt ^ (3 ) Fo r th a purpos e o f thi s summar y table , vapo r suppresse d rash* (VSR ) wer e assume d to reduce amission s by 35% . Th « pot t value fo r a VS R use d b y a facSa y t o compl y wit h th e MAC T standar d wi n b e obtaine d fro m a n ee^auo n tha t use s resut e o f a laborator y test condude d o n to suppresse d resin. (4 ) Va_u m b«ggir«fclose d mol d airin g wa s assume d to re_R ^ suc h tha t n o roll-ou t take s place . Thi s assumptio n mayb e modifie d afte r furthe r study .

Ban k •'- ' ' i 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1 0 1 1 1 2 1 3 1 4 1 5 1 6 1 7 1 8 1 9 2 0 2 1 2 2 2 3 2 4 2 5 2 6 2 7 2 8 2 9 3 0 3 1 3 2 3 3 3 4 3 5 3 6 3 7 3 8 3 9 4 0 4 1 4 2 4 3 4 4 4 5 4 8 4 7 4 8 4 9 S O Plan t Nam e CeremlcCeoljnpJ£we_Co_^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ ^
Bowi e Manufacturing , Inc . Willia m Kreysle r & Associates , tn t MonarohPtasticJria^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ ^
Johnso n Truc k

Bodie s Ne wYor k

Blowe r C a (Plan t #2 ) Nlanar a Fiberglass . Inc . Universa l Plasties . Inc . Teco . Inc . Eckte r Industrie s Retterbus h Injectio n Molde d Fiberglas s Corp . Custo m FSirealas s Manufacturin g C a Pickerf t Plasties , In a Fiber-Tec h Industries . Inc . Prototyp e Concepts , Inc . Diamon d Coac h Corp . IMC O Reinforce d Plastics . Inc . Plasti c Composite s Corp . Robro v Industries , In a (Beldino . Ml ) Sea l Reinforce d Fiberglas s Warminste r Fiberglas s C a (Jacksonville ) Warminste r Fiberglas s Co . (Southampton ) Ffoerotas s Industries , In a Aer o Transportatio n Product s E D Industries , In a (Sportsma n Picku p Covers ) McClart n Plasties , In a S . R . Smith . In a Arrowhead Plasti c Engineering , In a Chanc e Operations , In a Hv-Te c Ftoergtass . In a Gormen-Hup p Co . IK G Industrie s Norto n Performanc e Plastic s Corp . > Centur y Manufacturin g Co . Blu e Dolphi n Fiberglas s Pool s Grube r Systems . In a Larso n C a Oxfor d CMP . In a pmra i F.R.P . Simon-TeWed , In a Fowle r Manufacturing . In a M.C . Gff l Corp . Weighte d Average * HAP r I n nmr t resi n plug' s • .
32. 0

33. 5 33. 6 ______iS____
_

35. 0 35. 0 35. 0 35. 0 35. 4 37. 0 37. 0 44. 9 45. 0 38. 0 46. 0 40. 0 40. 0 40. 0 40. 0 40. 0 40. 0 40. 0 41. 0 •iSv^asSi'ir^-iH^SA?
. S^'^i^^ilyv*®^.?; 1 ;

••: ••41 7 <'•••.••'•:• • ^riM^^4V*S;*giJ»j S

43. 0 43. 0 43. 0 44. 0 45. 0 47. 0 48. 0 50. 0 50. 0 50. 0 50. 0 50. 0 50. 0 50. 5 57. 4 MAC T Moda l Poin t Valu e (befor e MACT ) fibs/ton ) b • 4 7 6 3 6 9 7 1 7 4 7 7 7 7 7 8 7 8 8 4 8 5 8 5 8 5 8 5 8 7 9 6 9 8 9 6 9 7 10 2 10 2 11 4 11 4 11 4 11 4 11 4 11 4 11 4 12 1 12 6 12 6 12 6 12 6 13 5 13 5 13 5 14 2 14 9 16 5 17 3 18 9 18 9 18 9 18 9 18 9 18 9 1 19 3 25 8 Othe r Emissio n Reductio n • . • .Tec&laui M • • •.' -

Vacuu m Beggin g

VS R VS R VS R

Average : 41 7


# 29iP.3 1



## Noncorrosio n - Resistan t Manua l Resi n Applicatio n Draf t Summar

y Tabl e (09/04/98 ) Legend : As8um^val-^»feq_tfpreihte ^

a • Th e HA P percentage s ar e i n term s o f weigh t percen t an d the y ar e base d o n th e HA P conten t o f th e nea t resi n plu s an y HA P that i s adde d t o th e resi n a t Ih e fadlit y (filler s no

t included) . b • Po W value s ar e expresse d a s pound s o f HA P pe r to n o f nea t resin plus .



### &>P.3 2



### Corrosio n - Resistan t Mechanica l Resi n Applicatio n Draf t Summar y Tabl e (09/04/98 )

Importan t Notes : (1 ) Th a poin t value s use d I n thi s summar y tabl e shoul d no t b e use d to determin e actua l emission s al e specifi c facility . Th e pot t valu e approac h doe s no t tak e Int o aeooun t al l o f th e variou s parameter s tha t ca n affe d a specifi c fadlily's emissions . (2 ) Thi s databas e onl y contain s fa—Hie s fo r whic h th e Admirustrato r h u Information . Olhe r facilitie s tha t shoul d b e par t o f thi s databas e ma y exis t

Ban k : 1 1 2 ? 3
• 4 5 6 7 8 9 1 1 1 2 1 3 1 4 1 5 1 6 1 7 1 8 1 9 20 2 1 22 23 2 4 2 5 26 2 7 28 2 9 3 0 3 1 3 2 3 3 3 4 3 5 3 6 3 7 3 8 3 9 4 0 4 1 4 2 4 3 4 4 4 5 4 6 4 7 4 8 4 9 S O 5 1 5 2 5 3 5 4 Plan t Nan a
pSfieTanKUi^^^^^^^^T^^^^^^^^^^^v!^ ! F.E . Meyer

s vetaso o Scal e Co . (Plastic

s Dtv. ) HEMCOCorp . L M . Pema . In a Magnu m Plastics , In a Yanke e Plasti c Co . Beetl e Plastics , In a Delt a Fiberglas

s Structures , In a Keamey/Weste m Powe r Product s Hartze B Fan , In a (Bld g 275 ) Appalachia n Plastics,'In a MF G - Molde d Fibe r Glas s Co . (Unio n City ) No n Metalli c Resources , In a Rave n Industries , In a (Siou x Falls) Smit h Ffcergtas s Products , h a (LttB e Rock) Xerxe s Corp . (Avon ) Xerxe s Corp . (Lakeland ) Xerxe s Corp . (Seguin ) Xerxe s Corp . (Tipton ) Xerxe s Corp . (Wmiamsport )

Owens-Comin g (Aubumdale ) Owens-Cornin g (Moun t Union ) Owens-Comin o Ffoergta s (Conroe ) Owens-Comin g Tank s (Valparaiso ) Pickenr s Plastics , In a Nov a Group , In a RedEwald , m a Bradle y Specialtie s Corp . GPICorp . Hasting s Reinforce d Plastic s • Viate c (Hastings ) Parkso n Aeratio n & Ffeergta s Corp. . In a H & R Industries . In a Ne wEnglan d Plasti c Coate d Products , In a Diamon d Fiberglas s Fabricators . In a Spear s Fabricatio n MF G Justi n Tanks . In a Ashwort h Plasti e Product s MBes Fiberglas s » Plasties . In a Owens-Comin g Fbergja s (Bakersfiekf ) Beden-Baug h products . In a Weighte d Averag e % HA P I n nea t resi n phi s a

35. 6 S,®^»s.»3;iMisiiS ^

38. 0 38. 7 40. 0 40. 0 40. 0 40. 0 41. 0 41. 0 42. 0 42. 3 S^i.a^i^B'KSV^;^ ! :•.:.—•:..'43.8^- : v;-- i ;^;£;5w*;S418.tt;Vss»s% S gS5&*8^a^ssj£ & «iSSS«43S»^i2 « ^SS^ijSJSiiSas® ® 

### g^j@®o;8^sis s i?!^iS®?4a8|asjgigij ® ai®ig®»3JJS!lSS!i®J

45. 0 45. 0 45. 0 45. 0 45. 0 45. 1 45. 5 48. 0 46. 0 48. 2 46. 3 46. 3 46. 7 47. 0 

### _-_-_J__-_-_ -

48. 9 50. 0 50. 0 50. 0 56. 9 MAC T Mode l Pot t Valu e (befor e MACT ) flbsftonib 11 4 12 0 152 16 0 168 18 5 19 3
• 19 9 20 9 22 7 22 7 22 7 . 227 243 24 3 25 8 25 8 25 8 26 3 28 8 28 8 28 8 28 8 28 8 28 8 28 8 28 8 28 8 28 8 29 0 309 309 309 309 30 9 30 9 30 9 31 1 31 8 32 8 32 8 33 1 333 333 34 1 34 7 34 7 384 40 7 40 7 40 7 570 Other./' : Emissio n ReducBo n

•j".;-...". - :>.••:

• •'.*&£ •:.V.:M,tfK%.''?'.> : V-'^jrF 7 " 7 ]



### _____^___^^^IHH^^H|M H 

# ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ H 

# —B—i——IHI1_B__^_l_l__^__ |

LH_i_H_B__H-_H-_ i

Average : 43. 8 liOgentt Asaime*v_^-»>lo—ttpn»Madg,&^ ^



# iS 'P.3 3



## Corrosio n - Resistan t Mechanica l Resi n Applicatio n Draf t Summar

y Tabl e (09/04/98 )

a » Th e HA P percentage s ar e I n term s o f weigh t percen t an d the y ar e base d o n th e HA P conten t o f th e nea t resin pu s an y HA P tha t I s adde d t o Ih e resin a t th e fadlit y (filler s rot incused) . b • Poin t value s ar e expresse d a s pound s o f HA P pe r to n o f nea t resi n pus .



# £L\P.3 4



## Noncorrosio n - Resistan t Unfille d Mechanica l Resi n Applicatio n Draf t Summar

y Tabl e (09/04/98 )
Importan t Notes : (1 ) Th e poin t value s use d i n thi s summar y tabl e shoul d no t b e use d to determin e actua l emission s a t a specffl c facility . Th e pot t valu e approac h doe s no t tak e int o accoun t a O o f th e variou s paramete r tha t ca n aife d a specifi c fad^ s emissions , (2 ) Th b databas e onl y contain s facilitie s fo r whic h th e AdmWstratorr_ i information . Othe r fac—la s tha t shoul d b e par t o f thi s databas e ma y exis t (3 ) Fo r th e purpos e o f thi s summar y table , vapo r suppresse d restis (VSR ) wer e assume d to reduce emission s by 35% . Th e poin t value fo r a VS R use d b y a facult y t o compl y wit h th e MAC T standar d wil l b e obtaine d fro m e n eolatio n tha t usmresult e o f a laborator y te d condude d o n tt a suppresse d resin. (4 ) Vacuu m bagging/close d mol d curin g wa s assume d to reduc e emission s b y 45 % wne n dose d mol d curirxjoecuraimmedlalefyef ^ suc h tha t n o roll-ou t take s place . Thi s assumptio n ma y b e modifie d alte r furthe r study .

Plan * Nam e Weighte d Averag e % HA P h nea t resin. pJus

, a ' MAC T Mode l

PottVau e (befor e MACT ) (fbjflgflXb .

Lawrenc e Wltlma n SCO. . In a 3 3 5 9 74 7 8 8 3 9 0 10 2 11 2 11 4 11 7 12 1 12 1 12 1 137 14 3 148 Other

VS R 1 8 lOrayso n Too l Co . 1 9 2 0 Into ! Manufacturing , tn a 34. 0 14 9 14 9 15 0 16 0 VS R 22 2 3 2 4 - 2 5 26 2 7 2 8 29 30 3 1 3 2 3 3 3 4 3 5 38 3 7 3 8 3 9 4 0 4 1 4 2 4 3 4 4 4 5 46 4 7 4 8 49 5 0 5 1 ACM E ReWbree d Plastics . In a Epoc h tndustrifl s • G&bo n Fiberglas s Reprod. , In a Gtesspe c Associates . Ltd . Johnso n Truc k

Bodie s Marle y Coolin a Towe r C a Ne w Yor k

Blowe r Co . (Plan t #2 ) Newpor t Laminate s Styl e Cres t Product s Universa l Plastics , In a VM C Ffeeralas s Products . Ino/Tri-Gla s Kreide r Manufacturing , m a Molde d Plasti c Industries . In a Comtee h Antenn a Systems . In a Do w Chemica l (Russeftvffle . AR ) Fix e Bod y Industries , m a RetterbushMedioi^AoWedr ^ Continenta l Campe r Ca . In a Pickerr s Plastics . In a Murph y Bod y Co . Allianc e Eauomen t Co. . In a Covermaster . In a Fbergtas s Forms , In a Fberglas s Specialties . In a r_— i lin e o f Asts—a . m a Ph D Carte r System , h a Piedmon t Ffeerglass . m a Ptos-Tech , Ltd . 35. 0 • - o 35.0 - . •

• • 35.0'--' " 35. 0 35. 0 35. 0 35. 0 35. 0 35. 0 35. 0 35. 0 35. 3 38. 0 37. 0 37. 0 37. 0 _—___!£__—_—_ i

38. 0 45. 0 39. 5 40. 0 40. 0 40. 0 40. 0 40. 0 40. 0 40. 0 40. 0 160 160 160 160 160 16 0 16 0 16 0 160 16 0 16 0 16 4 17 3 18 5 18 5 18 5 185 19 9 20 1 22 0 227 22 7 227 227 22 7 227 227 22 7 • " '\, ,, ; ' ' ' '

VS R



# idP.3 5



## Noncorrosio n • Resistan t Unfille d Mechanica l Resi n Applicatio n Draf t Summar

y Tabl e (09/04/98 ) 5 2 S 3 5 4 ' 55 5 6 5 7 5 8 5 9 6 0 8 1 6 2 6 3 8 4 6 5 6 8 6 7 6 8 6 9 ^7 0 7 1 72 73 7 4 7 5 7 6 7 7 7 8 7 9 8 0 8 1 8 2 B 3 8 4 8 5 .-'••8 8 8 7 8 8 8 9 9 0 9 1 9 2 93 9 4 9 5 9 8 9 7 9 8 9 9 10 0 10 1 10 2 Sea l Reinforce d Fiberglas s iyntechnic s Warminste r Fiberglas s Co . (Jacksonville ) Warminste r Fiberglas s Co . (Southampton ) Aer o Transportatio n Product s C & KFiberglas s Plastics . In a Delt a Fiberglas s & Environmenta l Products , In a Fiberglas s Plu s Recreationa l Industries , Inc . Gta s Master , m a (Plan t #1 ) Gla s Master , m a (Pbnt«2 ) GP M Industries , m a Mlchlan a Fiberglass,In a •><• ' Olympi c Ffeerglas s Industries , Inc . Plastj-Fab , Inc
. To m Smit h Ffeergtass , Inc . Ffeerglas s Industries , m a Lun d Industries , m a Northwes t Bodies . In a Elmor e Truc k

Accessories , In a Ffeerglas s & Plasti c Fab. . In a Globa l Glass . In a Standar d Glas , In a Bal a Product s Ltd . (Salisbury ) U.S . Ffeerglas s Products . In a Arrowhea d Plasti c Engineering , In a ' Chanc e Operations . In a Ffeerdome . m a (Ptenttl ) Gorman-RuppCo . ? Margui s Corp . Monarc h Plastic , In a Spectaft y Plastic s Associates . In e Arrow Dynamics , In a Beave r Moto r Coaches , m a Evelsnds , In a Flberglas i Engineerin g Corp . Mothe r Manufacturin g Co. . In a Peterso n Product s Pifflng s F.R.P . Sknon-Teleled , Inc . Tra B Wagons . In a KB KIndustries , In a Baj a Products (Tucson ) Attba r Plastics . In a Fibe r Pad , In a Pear l Baths , In a A m tec h Corp . Krrttfs , h a Plasti c Developmen t Co . Ultra/Gte s o f Lakevill e 40. 0 40. 0 40. 0 40. 0 iiSSSpSiw^i^iiiS ? i*ffiKSSaSol2'Sti®Si i llJMSJio^iimi l !&SiS§40l2l§8lli§ S 

### #3SII^MJilISI 8 

# E^^ian i iif^SSiiblSS^IMI i ^^S*_SM?i i Si^iiilii^^ S

40. 3 44. 0 41. 0 41. 0 41. 5 42. 0 42. 0 42. 0 42.0 ' 47. 5 46. 0 43. 0 43. 0 '•:':

• •• , > ' . 43. 0 • • •

. 44.o^,v«;v-;ft" ' 44. 0 44. 0 ' 44. 0 45. 0 • 45. 0 '

• ' 45.6'C ' 45. 0 45. 0 45. 0 45. 0 45. 0 45. 0 46. 0 47. 5 48. 0 48. 0 48. 7 50. 0 50. 0 50. 0 50. 0 227 22 7 22 7 22 7 23 0 23 0 23 0 23 0 23 0 23 0 23 0 23 0 23 0 23 2 24 1 24 3 243 25 0 25 8 25 8 25 8 25 8 26 3 28 4 "•••-'' .:>..'275' : '• " 275 :? .' -

### m:is292 ' ' 29 2 29 2 29 2 29 2 30 9 30 9 30 9 •309 J '''- ; UV' ' '30 9 • 309
--• • 30 9 30 9 309 32 8 34 7 35 8 368 366 380 407 40 7 40 7 407 Som e VS R

.,.'(••.",.'. - •:•• = .-. • > :

VS R (75% ) Carbo n filters . VS R (50% )

• •'•'• ' • • '"T-.; : " ' .• •< -...?'

'•'•'••.• '•"-V" ' .:••: . :'% ' ' '• ' \y. >;•: •

'•" • • • •••. 1 '--.;:^""- " - . •";•• • .'•••' • > •

• : " - ' •'••• • •;'.'.«/,:.. : •

- " • ' ••":' ; '••••.•.' " -> : ? •

Average : 40. 2

a • Th e HA P percentage s ar e i n term s o f weigh t percen t en d the y ar e base d o n th e HA P conten t o f th e nea t resi n pu s an y HA P tha t i s adde d t o th e resi n a t th e faettt y (ffler s m l induderf l b • Po W va— N ar a expresse d a s pound s o f HA P pe r to n o f nea t resi n put . 

# s\P.3 6



## Noncorrosio n - Resistan t Fille d Mechanica l Resi n Applicatio n Draf t Summar

y Tabl e (09/04/98 )
Importan t Notes : (1 ) Th e poin t value s use d i n thi s summar y tabl e shoul d no t b e use d t o detanTiln e actua l emission s a t a specifi c facffly . Th e pot t value approac h doe s no t tak e Int o accoun t a S o f th e variou s parameter a tha t ca n affe d a specatefecBiy s emissions . (2 ) TH s databas e onl y contain s facMie s fo r whic h th e Administrato r Ir a information . Othe r faefflie s tha t shoul d b e par t o f thi s databas e ma y exis t (3 ) N a emissio n reduction credi t wa s give n fo r th e us e o f vapo r suppressant s b i fille d resin systems . (4 ) Vacuu m bagging/dose d mol d curin g wa s assume d to reduc e emtestar a b y 45 % whe n dose d mol d curin g occur s immecOmely afte r reshape suc h tha t n o roll-out lake s place . Thi s assumptio n ma y b e modifie d alta r furthe r study .

Rank , 1 1 ' 2 3
' 4 ."-' 5 6 7 8 9 1 0 1 1 1 2 1 3 U 1 5 1 6 1 7 1 8 1 9 2 0 2 1 2 2

- 2 3 2 4 2 5 2 8 2 7 28 2 9 3 0 3 1 3 2 3 3 3 4 3 5 3 8 3 7 3 8 3 9 4 0 4 1 42 43 4 4 4 5 46 47 48 4 9 5 0 5 1 5 2 Plan t Nam e .•.•.?._• :

:'•••:-'':- 7 •'L-

t :":-""'T-=- - -- , .----_---- - -^—_•- - "..-T-T^--" - z-^.s - —~ -

Glasstss . m a Ffeergles s Products . In a Astori a Industries , In a Americ h Corp . (Hollywood , CA ) Hes s Count

y Industrie s o f WV , In a MF G -Molde d Fibe r Glas s C a (Adelanto ) S.W.C . Industries , m a (SwH-Wa y Dtv. ) Odo m Ffeerglass , In a Eckto r Industrie s Tornkkt s - LASC O Bathwar e (EBzabethtown ) Accr a Industries , In a Fleetwoo d (Fontan a - formerl y Gol d Shield ) America n Reinforce d Plastie s Ceda r Manufacturing , In a (Breme n Glas ) Tomkkt s • LASC O Bathwar e (Lancaster ) A F t E , m a (Moun t Eaton ) 20t h Centur

y Ffeemtass . In a (Plan t #4 ) A- 1 Ffeerglass . In a Clar k Manufacturin g Jaso n International , In a (N . tittl e Rock . AR ) KbhterC a Mr . Tubs , m a Plasti c Composite s Corp . Universa l Rundl e Corp . (Unio n Pott ) Fleetwoo d (Decatu r - formerl y Gol d Shield ) Cr—lam a Fiberglass , In a Bathcraftln a TomMn s - LASC O Bathwar e (Sout h Boston ) Electric-Glass . Inc . Hoi—a y Ramble r Corp. . Plan t 3 6 en d 3 7 Aqu a Bat h Co. . In a Aqu a Glas s Corp . (Klamat h Falls ) Associate d Plasties , In a E D Industries , m a (Sportsma n Picku p Covers ) Efe r Pumbingwar e (Wilson ) Glaso o Plastics . In a Image s Product s Corp . Jaso n Industries . Inc . (Elkhar t IN ) Lee r Midwest MeCtari n Plasties , Inc . Mired s Recreatio n Co . S . a Smith . In a Acm e Ffeerglass , m a AKE R P—— 3 Co. , In a (Plymouth . N Oa k Rd ) AKE R Plastic s Co. , m a (Plymouth . Pide o Or ) Weighte d Averag e % HA P I n nea t resi n nfct

t f t

35. 0 35. 0 35. 0 35. 0 35. 0 35. 0 35. 0 37. 0 47. 7 37. 5 37. 8 37. 9 38. 0 47 7 38. 5 40. 0 40. 0 40. 0 40. 0 40. 0 40. 0 40. 0 40. 0 40. 2 41. 0 41. 2 48. 1 42. 0 42. 0

. '42.6'' . •• ^Al'lA^Si O 42^>Si~'Y-'&^ ; A: : ;S^W^S?4_B'S5feSf^X?Si l

: ;•.•:•.. •••;•,.42.6 • v .•':••• • : ;®^SsS?4—S^fSiiKfiS ; '!-I*.'.T.- . t.ii.l^^i. 0 y . .-.1VV.V.-.V . • •'•.••:•:••'.'• . '426' . •':'•;::•'• ' 

### ?$&mmM&m$^M i^&??MitiSsis^MsMi 

### ?m^$w$W6^iw^ '£&&^$4$&$8£&&&^$ S^M^aj^MSSSS

43. 0 43. 0 43. 0 MAC T Mode l Pot t Valu e (befor e MACT ) (Tbs/tonj b

. 1 3 . 1 3 1 7 10 7 16 0 16 0 16 0 16 0 16 0 160 16 0 16 1 18 5 18 9 19 2 19 6 19 7 199 203 ' 20 6 227 227 227 22 7 22 7 227 227 22 7 23 0 243 248 256 25 8 25 8 268 268 268 26 8 268 28 8 26 8 26 8 268 268 26 8 26 8 27 5 275 27 5 • •/• , ';'v:'.--pihiir^i:: -! V - '' " kv'v. ' :•..• ; EmtssjcnRe_|dion..s,v;••;',.> • . , :> , :•?•*'•'•'• . .'..i.'\ x \v<:1Mhntau«,''.^'i}:'|...'..\ i i. > .C',. i '.•• "

VS R (Fille d Resi n Systems )

Therma l Oxidize r (47.6 % Control) . VS R (Fled )

VS R (Fille d Res h Systems ) ' "•'••••• VS R (File d Resi n Systems ) '.* V Therma l Oxidize r (43.7 % Control) . VS R IFOed l

. . '..
. .V. ' .;'•• • .•;',•• , M ;'..-:

. . •

•

VS R (50% . Fille d Resi n Systems ) VS R (Fille d Resi n Systems ) Therma l Oxidize r (30.2 % Control) . VS R (72% . Fined )

C8 I

VS R (FBe d Resi n Systems ) VS R (FBted Resi n Systems ) VS R (Fffle d Resi n Systems ) 

# 36P.3 7



## Noncorrosio n - Resistan t Fille d Mechanica l Resi n Applicatio n Draf t Summar

y Tabl e (09/04/98 ) S 3 54 55 S B 5 7 5 8 5 9 6 0 i6 1 6 2 6 3 ''6 4 6 5 6 6 *e»> - '-es " 6 9 7 0 

### ^ir'- 72 73 7 4 7 5 78 .v77 : - 7 8 7 9 6 0 Americ h Corp . (Charlotte . NC ) Aqu a Glas s Corp . (AdamsviDe ) Armorcas t Product s Co . Sunse t Plastics , Inc . Breme n Glas , In a Custo m Fireglas s Manufacturin g Co . Brurn d Product s o f Florida , m a G . W . Ffeerglass , Inc . McClur e Industries , Inc . Countr y Coach , m a UrwmsaM—idleCorp?(Oth.ifitwa ) '" ' B]erManufactunng(Va)oosta ) Tbrnkta - LASC O Bathwar e (Moapa ) . " V TomWns 7 - IXSCQBaOrm n (Anaheim ) Tomldn s - LASC O Bathwar e (Thre e Rivera ) Tomldns-LASC O Bathwar e (Cordate ) Nationa l Fibe r Glas s Products , In a • Nordi c Fiberglass . Ire . (Devil s Lake ) Nordi c Ffeerglass . h a (Warren ) Fiberglas s Systems , In a Oasi s Industries . In a Spac e Tables , In a Accurat e Glass , In a Grea t Lake s Plastic s Corp . Larso n Co . DascoPro.ln a Untversal-Rundl e Corp . (Ne wCastle ) 43. 0 43. 0 43. 0 43. 0 44. 0 44. 9 45. 0 45. 0 45. 0

•• ' ; 45. 9 -•-.••'• : 46. 5 47 0 47 0 47. 7 47. 7 47 8 48. 0 48 5 48 5 49. 0 49. 0 49. 0 60. 0 50. 0 50. 0 55. 0 60. 2 275 275 27 5 27 5 29 2 30 8 30 9 .-.^30 9 ..... . 30 9 32 6 33 4 33 7 34 7 34 7 36 0 36 0 36 2 36 8 37 6 376 387 387 38 7 40 7 407 407 52 3 66 2 VS R (FUe d Resi n Systems ) VS R (Fille d Resi n Systems ) VS R (Fille d Res m Systems )

x--- . .-. -.••• , -.•;• . -.;.•••->•:*;•..
. • • •-•••. •

VS R (Fine d Resi n Systems )

. .-n\ V . .-...:. . VS R (Fille d Resi n Systems ) v^R(Fttle d Resi n SYStems) < VS R (FHIe d Res m Systems) " VS R (FISe d Resi n Systems ) VS R (Fille d Resi n Systems )
' VS R (Fille d Resi n Systems )

:-',: \ .
Average : 42. 8 AJs-toMe^aMaamade ^

ai « Th e HA P percentage s ere I n term s o f weigh ! percen t an d the y ar e base d o n th e HA P conten t o f th e net t res m p— i an y HA P that badoe d to th e ras h a t th e fee—

y (fillers no t Included) . bi « Poin t value s ar e expresse d a s pound s o f HA P pe r to n o f nea t resi n plus .



# &u>P.3 8



## Corrosio n - Resistan t Filamen t Winding/Centrifuga l Castin g Draf t Summar

y Tabl e (09/04/98 ) Importan t Notes : (1 ) Th e poin t value s use d I n thi s summary tabl e shoul d no t b e use d to determin e actua l emission s a t a specifi c fadlity . Th e poin t valu e approac h doe s no t tak e int o accoun t al l o f th e variou s parameter s tha t ca n affe d a spedfi c fadltt/ s emissions . (2 ) Thi s databas e ctt y cartain s facilitie s fo r whic h th e Administrato r ha s Wbmiatio n Othe r fac—ie s tha t shoul d b e part o f thi s databas e ma y exis t

Ban k 1
••'2 "' 3 •'"' 4 5 6 7 8 9 1 0 1 1 1 2 1 3 1 4 1 5 1 6 1 7 1 8 1 9 2 0 2 1 22 2 3 24 2 5 26 2 7 28 2 9 3 0 3 1 3 2 3 3 3 4 3 5 3 6 3 7 3 8 3 9 4 0 4 1 42 43 Plan t Nam e •...-.* "

Velasc o Scal e Co.(Plastic s Dlv. ) ..::.. : ___^

_;
Xeno n Co. , In a Industria l Ffeerglas s Spec—ties , In a
Beetl e Plastics , In a

Xerxes Corp . (Avon ) Xerxe s Corp . (Anaheim ) Smit h Fiberglas s Products , In a (Littl e Rock ) Smit h Fiberglas s Products , In a (Wichita ) Ssnon-Telelec t In a Internationa l Pape r (Hampton ) AB C Industries . In a (Winon a Lake . IN ) AB C Industries . In a (Wallace , ID ) AB C Industries . In a (Gran d Junction . CO ) Rubbe r & Plasti c Applicators RedEwald . In a Owens-Comin a Tank

s (Valparaiso ) Owens-Comin a Ffeergla s (Conroe ) Owens-Comin g (Moun t Union ) Owens-Comin g (Aubumdale ) Fowle r Manufacturing , In a Ameron , In a (Burkbumett ) Nov a Group . In a Internationa l Reinforce d Plastic s GP I Corp . Specialt y Plastics . In a Ecowate r System s Hasting s Group . Inc.-vlate c (Belding ) MF G Justi n Tanks , In a Diamon d Fiberglas s Fabricators . In a Owens-Comin g Fibergla s (Bakersfield ) ConleyCorp . Weighte d Averag e % HA P i n neat res m pu s a 48. 0 ;^^^87_-_
_ 42. 0 ^^^42j()^ ^

42. 2 iiSssS44lBiJiifSS ; ISSS&l44!tfSPfS:sS

^ ^SS^ielfiSiS ' SSStsMesiM^S S *SiKV:>::^r:^"S441S^^.^'^i^:V^V.v' : !SiKSi®44jjSs?iSS5 t

44. 8 §I§is£4^S«SS : ^t§lM8Si*S§; §

45. 0 45. 0 45. 0 45. 0 45. 0 45. 0

45. 0 45. 1 46. 0 46. 0 47. 0 48. 0 48. 5 48. 9 49. 0 50. 0 50. 0 MAC T Mode l

Poin t Valu e (befor e MACT ) (lbs/ton ) b 5 2 14 4 14 8 15 4 15 4 18 4 16 4 16 4 16 4 16 5 16 7 16 9 17 8 17 9 17 9 17 9 17 9 17 9 17 9 17 9 17 9 17 9 18 0 18 0 18 0 18 0 18 0 18 0 18 0 18 0 18 0 18 5 18 5 19 0 19 5 19 8 200 20 1 20 1 20 6 208 Othe r Emissio n Reductio n

^ • •••••:•" ' ' •

~ . •: -^ - • ^ |

'



# •H--M- I

Average : Legen d Assume d value s - n o dat a

Footnotes : a • Th e HA P percentage s ar e i n term s o f weigh t perce t

i an d the y ar e base d o n th e HA P ocntert o f th e nea t res m plu s an y HA P tha t b adde d t o th e resin a t th e facilit

y (filler s no

t included) . b <• Poin t value s ar e expresse d a s pound s o f HA P pe r ton o f nea t resi n pus . 

# 31P.3 9



## Noncorrosio n - Resistan t Filamen t Winding/Centrifuga l Castin g Draf t Summar

y Tabl e (09/04/98 )
Importan t Notes : (1 ) Th e poin t value s use d I n thi s summar y tabl e shoul d no t b e use d t o determin e actua l emission s a t a specifi c facility . Th e poin t valu e approac h doe s no t tak e into accoun t al l o f th e variou s parameter s that ca n affec t a spedfi c facility' s emissions . (2 ) Th b databas e onl y contain s facilitie s fo r whic h th e Administrato r ha s Informatio n Othe r facilitie s tha t shoul d b e par t o f th' o databas e may exis t (3 ) Fo r th e purpos e o f thi s summary table , vapo r suppresse d resins (VSR ) wer e assume d t o reduc e emission s b y 35% . Th e poin t valu e fo r a VS R use d by a facilit y to compl y wit h th e MAC T standiard wil l b e obtaine d fro m a n equatio n that use s resulte o f a laborator y ta d oondude d o n th e fadlity s vapo r suppresse d resin

Ban k 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 • ' " E'ant ^ Nam e ;• ' ••.••'' • • . .' •

Emsi g Manufacturin g Corp . Henderson . Blac k

& Green , In a Sherma n Pole s weighted.;. . Averag e % HAP ; ^^mneatresinptoiB^ ^

35. 1 35. 5 ^^^^37^^^^ ^ MAC T Mode l Pot t Valu e (befor e MACT ) (lbs/ton ) fa 11 7 12 0 130 13 0 13 2 14 2 17 7 18 1 20 1 . Other. ' Emissio n Reductio n •••'.' • Techniques': ' •.' • ' " '••^ i - ''; '

Averag e 40. 0

a « Th e HA P percentage s ar a I n term s o f weigh t percen t an d the y ar e base d o n th e HA P conten t o f th e nea t resi n pu s an y HA P tha t b adde d t o th e resi n a t Ih e fadlit y (filler s rat Included) . b « Poin t value s ar e expresse d a s pound s o f HA P pe r to n o f nea t resi n pus .



# 3f cP.4 0


## Pigmente d Productio n Ge l Coa t Draf t Summar

y Tabl e (09/04/98 )
Importan t Notes : (1 ) Th e pot t value s use d h th b summar y tabl e shoul d no t b e use d t o de—rnin e actua l emission s a t a soecifk ; facility . Th e po W value approac h doe s no t tak e int o accoun t B B o f th a variou s parameter e tha t ca n affa d a specifi c fadlity' s emissions . (2 ) Th b databas e onl y centalInstac—ie s far whic h th e Admin—ra W has Infonnatkin . Othe r facilitie s tha t shoul d b e par t o f th b databas e ma y exis t Weighte d Averag e % HA P i n Nea t Ge l Coa t plu s a MAC T Mode l Poin t Vatu a (before MACT ) (Ibsfton^ q t—nfnlo n Rtductlo n ThemuilCoca—r

(90 % Control ) Trarrr-C-ftg»(85 % Control ) Ca—V_C—llzarW1%Cbntrol )

"W- ! ' , i : .\"'"-' ' Therma l OxkBze r (47.5 % Controf l Therma l Oxidize r (47.5 % Connor )

'>Si^'*'#*v''''- v ' . ><\< S »»:-• • •!'• " ••••. ^ '

2 8 20t h Century Ffeerglass . In a (Plan t «4 ) 303 303

35. 0 33 8 A- 1 Ffeerglass . In a 35. 0 33 8 30 Aer o Transportatio n Product s 35. 0 33 8 Alte c Industries . In a (Midwes t Oper. ) 35. 0 33 8 Americ h Corp . (Charlotte . NC ) 35. 0 33 8 Americ h Corp . (Hollywood . CA ) 35. 0 33 8 3 4 Arro wDynamics . In a 35. 0 33 8 3 5 AMba r Plastics . In a 35. 0 33 8 3 8 C & KFfeerglas s Plastics , m a 35. 0 33 8 3 7 Century Manufacturin g Co . 35. 0 33 8 Cl—tan a Ffeerglass . to— 35. 0 33 8 3 9 [Covarmaster . m a

_ l

_ 1 4 2 |Fl»erdome , m a (Plan t «1 ) 3 5 0 33 8 Glasspe e Associates . Ltd . 35. 0 33 8 Grea t Lake s Plastic s Corp . 35. 0 33 8 HEMCOCorp . 35. 0 33 8 Her—p a Marbl e o f Ohio . In a 35. 0 33 8 4 7 Hofiday Ramble r Corp. . Plan s 3 6 an d 3 7 35. 0 33 8 KKratra.m a 35. 0 33 8 *4 9 KrusoarMamationattnc . 

## I»~!J_HI_HHH_I 1
5 3 5 4 Lawrenc e WWma n 8 , Co . m a Lee r Eas t In a Leer Midwes

t McCtari n Plastics . In a 35 0 33 B 33 8 35. 0 35. 0 35. 0 35. 0 33 8 33 8 33 8 33 8 

# &lP.4 1 • « • ". ' ' ' ' i 

## Pigmente d Productio n Ge l Coa t Draf t Summar

y Tabl e (09/04/98) 5 5 5 8 5 7 5 8 5 9 6 0 6 1 6 2 6 3 6 4 6 5 ''68 ' • ' 6 7 6 8
.-,:«

_.• • 70 7 1 7 2 7 3

•• ; 74>-- - '•?7 5 ' Melche r Manufacturin g Co. , In a Molde d Plasti c Industries , In a Murph y Bod y C a Osborn e Industries , in a Peterso n Product s Ph O Carte r System , in a Pickerf s Plastics , m a Piedmon t Ffeerglass , In a Plasti c Developmen t Co . Retterbua h Wectjo n Molde d Ffeerglas s Corp . Robro y Industries , he . (BekJlno . Ml ) Sea l Reinforce d Fiberglas s . -" " " ' Shion-Telelec t In a Standar d Glas . In a '.'•••K;U StytoCrestPrbduct s To m Smit h Ffeerglass . m a Trai l Waaons . In a Universa l Plastics , m a Universa l Rundta Com . (Unio n PoW ) Univeraal-Rundl e Corp . (Ne w Castle ) Xero t \ Cci , ma''& > •."••v-

' 35. 0 35. 0 35. 0 35. 0 35. 0 35. 0 35. 0 35. 0 35. 0 35. 0 35. 0 35. 0 35. 0 35. 0 35. 0 35 0 35. 0 35. 0 35. 0
' 35:0'- : :•..•••'.•:; ' 3S.o:' : 33 8 33 8 33 8 33 8 33 8 33 8 33 8 33 8 33 8 33 8 33 8 33 8 33 8 33 8 33 8 33 8 33 8 33 8 33 8 33 8 33 8 7 7 iNort—Fiberglass . IrxirDev-Lake ) 1 35 —1 34 1

= 7 9 iRaventndi_Sle^1r_(SleuxFalls): . iSf?* ; . > ;S;Sii»H. ; 'i->^' ,¥ —_^^.'-'S:|-. . .•'"••'841 . 8 0 8 1 82 8 3 8 4 8 5 8 8 8 7 8 8 6 9 9 0 9 1 9 2 9 3 9 4 95 9 8 9 7 9 8 9 9 10 0 10 1 10 2 10 3 10 4 10 5 10 8 10 7 10 8 10 9 11 0 11 1 11 2 11 3 11 4 '11 5 11 6 11 7 11 8 11 9 12 0 NordieFibergfassJneJWan^ ^

Edue r Industrie s 1 35 > H & R Industries , m a >\ 35. 9 EJerMarwfecturkwWaldost* ) Ffeerglas s &Plasti e Fab. , In a FioridsLmeofAstatulam a Hy-Te c Ffeerglass , trie . Newpor t Laminate s Northwes t Bodies , In a Oasi s Industries , In a Primero , In a Verte x Plasties , h a Pear l Baths , In a Tomkh s - LASC O Bathware (Anaheim ) Tomkin s - LASC O Bathware (Cordate ) Tomkh s - LASC O Bathwar e (Moapa ) Tomkh s - LASC O Bathware (Thre e Rivers ) Tomkh s - LASC O Bathwar e (Yean ) Arrowhea d Plasti c Engineering , In a Sunse t Plasties , m a ^^^^^^^ i Ete r P—nbhgwar e (Wilson ) Accurat e Glass , h e Ffer e Bod y Industries , In a Monarc h Ptastt a m a Nationa l Ffee r Glas s Products . In a Aqu a Glas s Corp . (Klamat h Fads ) Diamon d Fbarg— u Fabrics—rs . h a E-T-MEr—rprises . h a E D Industries , In a (Sportsma n Picku p Covers ) Gtasst—' . m a 38. 0 36. 0 38. 0 36. 0 • .,,. , sa o 38. 0 36. 0 38. 0 36. 0 36. 0 36. 2 36. 4 36. 4 36. 4 38. 4 36. 4 36. 6 36. 6 36. 8 37. 0 37. 0 37. 0 37. 0 -^a^jjjjvji^ - <—kSKsia!—?"-^

' NssSi&aeJi^Sft'

^ ^>jr.Mtf^-H. " '•<-i^3a9^v v s 34 7 34 9 35 0 35 1 35 3 35 6 35 6 35 6 35 6 35 8 35 6 35 8 35 6 35 8 35 6 36 0 384 364 364 364 364 36 7 36 7 37 1 37 5 375 373 375 373 373 373 37 3 373 

### •

• 

### ^ " V

''"- ' ' ;: - ' " •'•'•" • ' ••^' - -••••' • ""^jl"^ji^W - ^S~^~^~f^ - ~^^^~vl~^^ ^

• ' ••"•'•• ' •' • - ; " ' ,-vfc;; ; " ' W ' ••:'•£: '

1 \

s 4 

### <

: - •''-;*•• •

2P.4 2



## Pigmente d Productio n Ge l Coat Draf t Summar

y Tabl e (09/04/98 ) 12 1 12 2 12 3 12 4 12 5 12 6 12 7 '•••'i28> " 12 9 130 13 1 132 13 3 13 4 13 5 13 8 13 7 13 8 13 9 14 0 141 14 2 14 3 14 4 14 5 14 8 14 7 14 8 14 9 15 0 15 1 15 2 15 3 15 4

. 15 5 15 8 15 7 15 8 15 9 16 0 161 16 2 16 3 16 4 16 5 16 3 16 7 16 8 16 9 17 0 171 17 2 17 3 17 4 17 5 17 6 17 7 17 8 17 9 18 0 16 1 18 2 18 3 18 4 18 5 18 6 Hoo d Mar—aduring , In a Jaso n Industries , h a (Elkhar t IN ) Mirad e Recreatio n Co . Odo m Ffeerglass , h a P_df e Composite s Corp . S.W.C . Industries , h a (Swirt-We y Div. ) Xerxe s Corp . (Seguh ) Xerxe s Corp . (Waaamsport ) An—c h Corp . • " " F_*Fab.m a ACM E ReWoree d Plastics , In a Aqu a Glas s Corp . (AdamsviOe) " Blu e Dotoh h Fiberglas s Pod s Epoc h Industrie s Appi—cliia n Plastics , m a Associate d Plastics , h a Fleetwoo d (Fori—i a - formerl y Gol d Shield )

3 . R . Smith . In a A R E. , in a (Moun t Eaton ) EaoJ a Craf t In a Universal-Rundl e Corp . (Ottumwa ) Beave r Moto r Coaches , In a KB KIndustries . Inc . -".•,••' : 38.9.- . . ^il?385Kiis ^ «t§li363l^l S 

### 5^^3§3l1S^ P *m-£>9lr-& R ^^3l3i^ # ®J?^_t9liS§t?I J B8-agaBB B *SSSSS«B3?SSKSSS8i 5 37. 4 37. 5 37. S 37. 5 37. 5 37. 5 37. 5 37. 8 37. 5 38. 0 38. 0 38. 0 38. 0 38. 5 38. 5 FberPad,h a 1 38. 8 Spac e Tables , fn a 1 39. 0



### . : • '.':. '

. - -....- . . - ' Accr a Industries , h a Acm e Ffeerglass , h a Affianc e Equipmen t Co. , m a Astori a Industries , h a Bradley Specialtie s Corp . Cerami c Coolin g Towe r C a Chanc e Operations , In a Comtee h Antenn a Systems , In a Continenta l Campe r Co. , h a Delt a Ffeerglas s Structures , m a Diamon d Coac h Corp . Elmore Truc k

Accessories , m a Ffeerglas s Forms , In a Ffeerglas s Plu s Recreationa l Industries , In a Ffeerglas s Products . In a Fbergtes s Spedsllies . In a Ffeerglas s Systems , h a G . W . Ffeergtess , In a Gfebe n Ffeerglas s Reared. , In a Gtasg o Plastics , In a GrevsonTodCo . LM.Pema.ln a KeameyrWeste m Powe r Product s KohlerCo . 40. 0 40. 0 40. 0 40. 0 40. 0 40. 0 40. 0 40. 0 40. 0 40. 0 40. 0 40. 0 40. 0 40. 0 40. 0 40. 0 40. 0 40. 0 40. 0 40. 0 40. 0 40. 0 40. 0 40. 0 37 3

37 3 37 3 37 3 37 3 373 37 3 •;'< : -4 v --'373--''v . -•'" ' 37 3 38 2 38 4 38 4 38 4 38 4 38 5 38 5 38 5 38 5 39 3 394 39 4 394 40 4 40 4 40 9 41 4 41 5 41 6 41 9 43 4 43 4 43 4 43 4 43 4 43 4 43 4 43 4 43 4 43 4 43 4 43 4 43 4 43 4 43 4 43 4 43 4 43 4 43 4 43 4 43 4 43 4 43 4 43 4 

### , .

. .

' • • •• - •*" • :;••• A - . • ,-• - ..- • : •;.;.•.••;:.•.•. • .<. •

. . '..i-j^ * • •

'•.'• • > ' • ' •'•' • ..,^.v•'W , ^ , •(. '

. ' . '•'.*• ' ••' * '* ' • ^- c 'Vv ; *: • . . -.

. • . •.•:*;
. o

. .W ' •

• • "' : : ; '• ' ' • •..'.•.i-. l .": , A: v r;•:.-;•' : - '

\\t\ : '- ' ' • , .

• • . ,- . .-, . ,•!•.' •

• ' i l ' '"' :

Larso n C o 1 40. 0 ^ 1 43 4 i | Marto y Coofin o Towe r C a MF G - Molde d Ffee r Glas s Co . (Adelanto ) Nbosr a Ffeergtess . h a No n Me—ti c Resources , h a Peci V Tank . Lt d Prototype 1 Concopts , Inc . RedEwakth a 40. 0 40. 0 40. 0 40. 0 40. 0 40. 0 40. 0 43 4

43 4 43 4 43 4 43 4 43 4 43 4 

# HIP.4 3

« A 4


## Pigmente d Productio n Ge l Coa t Draf t Summar

y Tabl e (09/04/98 ) 18 7 188 189 190 19 1 19 2 19 3 19 4 :"19 5 :• ' 196 '.197-i' v 19 8 199 20 0 ; '20l " 20 2 20 3 20 4 20 5 20 6 Syntechnic s Taco . b — Warminste r Fiberglas s C a (Jacksonville ) Warminste r Ffeerglas s C a (Southampton ) Yanke e Plasti c Co . Custo m Fbreglas s Manufacturin g Co . America n Reinforce d Plastie s GPICorp . •• : r Fleetwoo d (Decatu r • formerl y Gd d Shield ) Bristo l Ffeeriit e Industrie s GormavRuppCo . . . Bninne l Product s o f Florida , m a . Ffeerglas s Engineerin g Cor a Unite d Pane l In a MFG-Molde d Fibe r Gtes s Co . (Unio n City ) Mart—cas t Products , h a Rynon e Mar—acturh g Corp . (Sayr e Plant ) 40. 0 40. 0 40. 0 4tt 0 40. 0 40. 4 40. 5 41. 0 41. 4 41. 4 42. 0 45. 0 45. 0 45. 0 49. 0 50. 0 50, 0 43 4

43 4 43 4 43 4 43 4 44 2 44 4 45 4 46 2

. 46 3 47 5 54 1 54 1 54 1 63 4 65 8 65 8 '•. ' ^>^c : ..•.,'... , .. • :::}.• ::\-y;>-:

.:'•' ...'.'?•••. ' " " ' ' ' .'''•• ' A '

Average : 36. 9

AssumedvBk^s.nodal a

a • Th e HA P percer—ga s ar e h term s o f weig M per—r a an d lh ^ a t th e facility . b • Pot t value s ar e expresse d a s pound s o f HA P pe r ton o f nea t ge l coa t pus .



# .42- -P.4 4



## Clea r Productio n Ge l Coat Draf t Summar

y Tabl e (09/04/98 )
Importan t Notaa - (1 ) Th e poin t value s use d h th b summar y tabl e shoul d no t b e use d t o determin e actus i emission s a t a spedfi c fadlity . Th e pot t valu e approac h doe s ne t tak e int o accoun t a B o f th e variou s pararratersth d ca n alfe d a spedftefadB/ s emissions . (2)Thbdatabas a onl y contain s facOHies fo r whid i th e Administrato r has[information . Othe r facilities tha t shoul d b e par t o f th b databas e ma y exis t

Bank Plan t Nam a Weighte d Averag e % HA P i n Nea t Ga l Coa t plu s a MAC T Mode l Poin t Valu e (befor e MACT ) Othe r Emissio n Reductio n ''•'"•''"'-Tjchnkiu

a • . • • Tri-CS y Marble , In a 40. 0 *$m^\iTMi>'-<>ft-&y Venetian Marble

. In a (Hetotes , TX) 40. 0 Marbl e Designs , tn a 43. 0 I Mes a Full y Formed , h a 44. 0 Aust h Countertops . h a 45. 0 Came o Marbl

e 45. 0 54 1 Cap— 1 Marbt o Creations . In a 45. 0 541 1 0 Carolin

a Counter

s 45. 0 54 1 Centra l Mart

—Products , In a 45. 0 54 1 12 Foremos t to—riots. In a 45. 0 54 1 1 3 GesmarCorp . 45. 0 541 1 4 KJBfrio

o Corp. 45. 0 54 1 15 Upper ! Corp. 45 0 54 1 1 6 Schml

H Marbl e Product

s 45. 0 541 1 7 Southeas tMarble , In a 45. 0 54 1 1 8 Unite

d State s Marble. In a 45. 0 54 1

5 0 5 1 5 2 5 3 5 4 Capo n Vsls y Marble , m a Cutuw d Marbl e Produc— , Ltd . htamationa l Marble , m a Mjrt—cas t Produds . h a M h o w Mart —Manu f adurin a m a 5 5 IPWsfsCu-re d Marble , m a 50. 0 50. 0 50. 0 50 0 50. 0 50. 0 65 8 65 8 65 8 65 8 65 8 65 8 

# t&P.4 5



## Clea r Productio n Ge l Coat Draf t Summar

y Tabl e (09/04/98 ) 5 7 5 8 5 9 6 0 6 1 6 2 R&DMatbl e Synmar , In a Venetia n Marble , In a (Richmond , VA ) Rom a Marble . In a Accen t Marbl e Co. . h a (Houston . TX ) Partheno n Marbl e Products . In a 50. 0 50. 0 50. 0 52. 5 53. 0 60. 0 65 8

65 8 65 8 72 1 73 4 92 6 Average : 47. 3

• •Th e HA P percentage s ar e h tenn t o f weigh t p^ ^ atthefaciay . b' • Po W value s Br

a expresse d a s pound s o f HA P pa r ton o f nea t ge l coa t pus .



# HP.4 6



## Toolin g Ge l Coa

t Draf t Summar

y Tabl e (09/04/98 ) Importan t Notes ; (1 ) Th e poin t value s use d h thi s summar y tabl e shoul d no t b e use d t o determin e actua l emission s a t a specifi c facility . Th e poin t valu e approac h doe s nr t take into accoun t al l o f th e variou s parameter s tha t ca n affe d a specifi c facility' s emissions . (2 ) Th b databas e onl y contain s facilitie s fo r whic h th e Administrato r ha s information . Othe r facilitie s tha t shoul d b e par t o f th b databas e ma y exis t

Ban k 1 2
••" 3
• 4 5 6 7 8 9 1 0 1 1 1 2 1 3 1 4 1 5 1 6 1 7 1 8 Plan t Nam e A R . E , In a (Masslfon ) ^V?: " •.'il-v ' l...::a£ . - ..-'. . ...' . , -.•:'-'2-.". :

Eckle r Industrie s
Grube r Systems , In a Balhcraft , h g

S . R . Smith . In a Weighte d Averag e % HA P I n Nea t Ge l Coat plu s q

^^42TJ^^ ^

45. 6

48. 0 MAC T Mode l Pot t Valu e (befor e MACT ) (lbs/ton ) b 3 0 39 4 43 1 43 1 433 43 4 475 475 533 55 3 56 3 57 4 57 5 58 5 590 59 2 596 61 0 Othe r Emissio n Reductio n ..:'..:••; . . Therma l .ttddlia r (95 % Control ) . . •..•<•' .

44. 2

Footnotes : a a Th e HA P percentage s ar e h term s o f weigh t percen t an d they ar e base d o n th e HA P conten t o f th e nea t ge l coa t pu s an y HA P tha t b adde d t o th e ge l coa t a t th e facility . b » Pot t value s ar e expresse d e s pound s o f HA P pe r to n o f nea t ge l coat pus .



# 4 ^P.4 7 •.•.«,~j...-.-.;. . 

# WEBSIT E ADDRESSE S
Coating s an

d Composite s Rul e Development—main page : www.epa.gov/ttn/uatw/coat/coat.htm l

Reinforce d Plastic s Project : www.epa.gov/ttn/uatw/coat/rein/reinplas.htm l

Boa tManufacturin g Project : www.epa.gov/ttn/uatw/coat/boat/boat_man.htm l

U S EPA' s Smal

l Busines s Assistanc e Program : www.epa.gov/ttn/sba p



# 4o ?P.4 8

T ' I * o • 

## Meeting Announcement: Reinforce dPlastic s MAC T Standar d Developmen t
* Wha ti s th e purpose ? Th e purpos e i s t o provid e aforu mfor smal l businesse s t o discus s concerns , presentideas , an dt o provid e feedbac k

o n th e rul e developmen t an d potentia l requirements . * Wh y shoul d smal l businesse s b e interested ? Smal l businesse s shoul db e intereste d becaus e the y ma y b e impacte d b y th e rul e bein g develope dfo r

th e reinforce dplastic s industry . Thi s foru mwil l provid e a n opportunit y fo r smal l businesse s t o provid e insigh t an d suggestion s that

coul d mak e th e impact s o f th e rul e les s costly . * Wha tpar to f

th e reinforce d plastic s industr y wil l th e meetin g address ? Ope n molders . Ope n molder s produc e composit e plastic s usin g styren e and/o r methy l methacrylat e containin g thermosettin g resin s b y an y on e o r mor e o f th e followin g processes : * ge l coatin g * mechanica l (eg . spray up , flo w coating , pressur e fe d roller ) o r manua l (eg . bucke tan

d brush ) applicatio n o f

resi n * filamen t

winding/centrifuga l castin g * Wher e i s th e Meeting ? Th e meetin g wel l b e hel da t th e Environmenta l Protectio n Agency' s Environmenta l Researc h Cente r

(ERC ) Auditorium , Researc h Triangl e Park , Nort h Carolina . Th e ER C i s th e larg e bric k

buildin g i s at

th e corner

o f N.C . Highway 5 4 an d Alexande r Drive . Direction s ca n b e foun da t "www.epa.gov/ttn/uatw/coat/coord/map_dir " Fo r person s wishin g t o participat e b y telephone , atelephon e conferenc e call-i n numbe r wil l b e availabl e (se e "Fo r

mor e informatio n contact") . * Whe n i s th e meeting ? Th e meetin g wil l b e from9:0 0 amt o 3:0 0 pm , o n Friday , Septembe r 11 , 1998 .

* Wh o wil l b e i n attendance ? Th e Composite s Fabricator s Associatio n (CFA ) an d th e SPI/Composite s Institut e (SPI/CI ) ar e currentl y identifyin g atota l o f 2 0 smal l businesse s i n th e ope n moldin g subcategor y wh o coul drepresen t th e smal l busines s interest s i n th e rul e development . Othe r businesse s representative s ar e welcom e t o attend . EP A encourage s businesse s pre registe r t o assis t i n planning . 

# •W

### *

•• ' u * . . P.4 9



## * Ho w d o I pre-register ? If you hav e bee

n identifie d an

d contactedb

y th e CF A or SPI/C I as apotentia

l participant , you ar e alread y pre-registered . Otherwis e you ca n pre-registe

r b y eithe r callin g or sendin g electroni c mai l (E-mail ) t o Madeleine Stru m(se e "For

furthe r information") . Pleas e include th e following information : you r name , affiliation (company , position ) phone number , E-mail address , mailing address , an dfa x number . * Who t o contac tfo r mor e information ? Madeleine Strum , EPA , Project Lea dfo r MAC T Standar dDevelopment . Phone

- (919)541-238 3 Fax

- (919)541-5689 . E-mail : strum.madeline@epamail.epa.go v Mailing Address : MD-13 , RTP , N C 2771 1 Fo r additiona l informatio n i

n regard s t o th e rul e developmen

t statu s check

th e reinforce d website . The websit

e addres s is : http://www.epa.gov/ttn/uatvv/coat/rein/rein_plas.htm l
* Anythin g else ? Th e meeting i s casua

l dress .



# m