alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
From: "Steve M. Calderon" <Calderon.Steve@azdeq.gov>

To: Colleen McKaughan/R9/USEPA/US@EPA

Cc: "Lisa M. Tomczak" <Tomczak.Lisa@azdeq.gov>, Bryan Paris <Paris.Bryan@azdeq.gov>

Date: 12/19/2012 02:55 PM

Subject: Pinal County PM2.5 Clean Data Finding

December 19, 2012

Dear Mrs. McKaughan:

The Arizona Department of Environmental Quality (ADEQ) would like to formally request from the 

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) a clean data finding for Pinal County, Arizona for PM2.5 for the 

period of 2009 through 2011. Thus far, Pinal County has recorded no exceedances of the PM2.5 standard 

through December 19, 2012 from the Cowtown monitor.

If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at: 602-771-2352.

Sincerely,

Steven M. Calderon, Manager

State Implementation Plan Section

Air Quality Division

Arizona Department of Environmental Quality

1110 W. Washington Street

602-771-2352

smc@azdeq.gov

NOTICE: This e-mail (and any attachments) may contain PRIVILEGED OR CONFIDENTIAL information and is intended only 

for the use of the specific individual(s) to whom it is addressed. It may contain information that is privileged and 

confidential under state and federal law. This information may be used or disclosed only in accordance with law, and you 

may be subject to penalties under law for improper use or further disclosure of the information in this e-mail and its 

attachments. If you have received this e-mail in error, please immediately notify the person named above by reply e-mail, 

and then delete the original e-mail. Thank you.
**Exhibit 32.02**

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIALOFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. §1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OFTHE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the annual report on Form 10-K ofIntrado Inc. (the “Company”) for the period ended December 31, 2003, as filedwith the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),the undersigned, Michael D. Dingman, Jr., Chief Financial Officer of theCompany, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

(1)          theReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)          theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
|     | /s/ Michael D. Dingman, Jr.                     |
|----------|-------------------------------------------------|
|     | Michael D. Dingman, Jr.                         |
|     | Chief Financial Officer                         |
| * * | *(Principal  Financial and Accounting Officer)* |

Dated: March 16,2005

 

----
#### TDK Electronics Corporation, Appellant, v M & A Enterprises et al., Defendants, and Video City International, Inc., et al., Respondents.

In an action, *inter alia,*to recover payment for goods sold and delivered, the plaintiff appeals from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Goldstein, J.), dated November 1, 1989, as denied that branch of its motion which was to dismiss the second affirmative defense and counterclaim.

Ordered that the order is reversed insofar as appealed from, on the law, with costs, and that branch of the motion which was to dismiss the second affirmative defense and counterclaim is granted.

In this action, the plaintiff is attempting to collect payment for blank video and audio tapes sold to the defendants. The defendants have asserted, by way of affirmative defense and counterclaim, that the plaintiff discriminated against them in violation of the Federal and State antitrust laws by selling the same goods to other distributors at a lower price.

The Supreme Court erred in refusing to dismiss this defense and counterclaim. An alleged violation of the antitrust laws is not a defense to an action to recover payment for goods sold and delivered or services rendered *(see, Bruce’s Juices v American Can Co.,*330 US 743; *Columbia Broadcasting Sys. v Roskin Distribs.,*31 AD2d 22, *affd*28 NY2d 559). Additionally, we find that the allegations of price discrimination in this case do not state a cause of action under State antitrust laws *(see, Milwaukee Elec. Tool Corp. v McGrath & Durk,*133 AD2d 535, 536; *Creative Trading Co. v Larkin-Pluznick-Larkin, Inc.,*75 NY2d 830; *State of New York v Mobil Oil Corp.,*38 NY2d 460). Lawrence, J. P., Fiber, Balletta and Ritter, JJ., concur.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

December 16, 2011 

y1213 

Order 

 

December 16, 2011 

142246 

MICHAEL NASON, 

Petitioner-Appellee, 

v SC: 142246 

 COA: 290431 

Marquette CC: 08-045798-AA 

STATE EMPLOYEES’ RETIREMENT 

SYSTEM, 

Respondent-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On December 7, 2011, the Court heard oral argument on the application for leave 

to appeal the October 28, 2010 judgment of the Court of Appeals. On order of the Court, 

the application is again considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that 

the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
#### The Zeigler Milling Co., Appellant, *v.*City of Bucyrus, Appellee.

(No. 30438

Decided October 24, 1945.)

*Mr. O. W. Kennedy*and *Mr. Charles F. Schaber,*for appellant.

*Mr. John C. Carroll*and *Mr. C. Victor Vollrath,*for appellee.

It is ordered and adjudged that this appeal as of right be, and the same hereby is, dismissed for the reason that no debatable constitutional question is involved.

*Appeal dismissed.*

Weygandt, C. J., Zimmerman, Bell, Williams, Turner, Matthias and Hart, JJ., concur.
EXHIBIT 32.1


CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER


PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)


In connection with this Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2011 (the “Report”) of PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd. (the “Registrant”), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Arthur H. Penn, Chief Executive Officer of the Registrant, hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge, that:


|   |                                                                                                                                  
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

|   |                                                                                                                                                        
|-- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.







/s/ Arthur H. PennArthur H. PennAugust 4, 2011
Page 1 of 1

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

Case No. DA 22-0509

ROBERT WINKOWITSCH, 

Plaintiff and Appellee, 

-vGLACIER ELECTRIC CO-OP, INC., 

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER GRANTING

FIRST EXTENSION

Upon consideration of Appellee’s First Motion for Extension of Time 

Pursuant to Rule 26(1), M. R. App. P., and good cause appearing, 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellee is granted an extension of time 

up to and including July 12, 2023 within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellee’s 

response brief on appeal. 

ELECTRONICALLY DATED AND SIGNED BELOW.

Electronically signed by:

Bowen Greenwood

Clerk of the Supreme Court

June 6 2023

06/06/2023

Case Number: DA 22-0509
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK

Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

908 

TP 16-00260 

PRESENT: PERADOTTO, J.P., LINDLEY, NEMOYER, AND SCUDDER, JJ. 

 

 

IN THE MATTER OF SHAWN AVERY, PETITIONER, 

V ORDER

ANTHONY ANNUCCI, ACTING COMMISSIONER, 

NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS 

AND COMMUNITY SUPERVISION, RESPONDENT. 

 

WYOMING COUNTY-ATTICA LEGAL AID BUREAU, WARSAW (LEAH R. NOWOTARSKI OF

COUNSEL), FOR PETITIONER. 

ERIC T. SCHNEIDERMAN, ATTORNEY GENERAL, ALBANY (JULIE M. SHERIDAN OF

COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT. 

 

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to the

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Fourth Judicial

Department by order of the Supreme Court, Wyoming County [Michael M.

Mohun, A.J.], entered February 18, 2016) to review a determination of

respondent. The determination found after a tier III hearing that

petitioner had violated various inmate rules. 

It is hereby ORDERED that the determination is unanimously

confirmed without costs and the petition is dismissed. 

Entered: November 10, 2016 Frances E. Cafarell

Clerk of the Court
Exhibit 32.1  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  The undersigned hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to their knowledge, the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2012 of VB Clothing, Inc. (the Company) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and the information contained in such periodic report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in such report.  Very truly yours,   /s/ Anthony PasqualeAnthony PasqualeChief Executive Officer/s/ Anthony PasqualeAnthony PasqualeChief Financial OfficerDated: August 27, 2012     A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to VB Clothing, Inc. and will be furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
EX-10.39



 IMAX CORPORATION 

EXHIBIT 10.39 
 Robert
D. Lister Renewal – Term Sheet 
 January 23, 2014 

Term: 4 years 
  

			
	Base Salary:	  	2014 – $625k
		  	2015 – $650k
		  	2016 – $675k
		  	2017 – $700k

 Bonus Target: 60% 

LTI: $1.4M/annum = $5.6M total grant value 
  

	 	•	 	Terms: 

  

	 	•	 	Four annual grants of $1.4M (first grant after current blackout ends) 

  

	 	•	 	2014: 50% stock options/50% RSU’s 

  

	 	•	 	2015: 40% stock options/60% RSU’s 

  

	 	•	 	2016: 33% stock options/67% RSU’s 

  

	 	•	 	2017: 25% stock options/75% RSU’s 

  

	 	•	 	4-year vesting (1/4 each year) 

  

	 	•	 	Upon termination after CIC, to the extent total value of vested options & RSU’s from these grants is less than $5.6M, severance will be increased by difference. 


Other Changes 
  

	 	•	 	Termination/Severance: Definition of Termination without Cause will no longer include a resignation in the event RLG ceases to be CEO. 


 

	 	•	 	Change in Control: Second trigger on vesting of options/RSU’s will no longer be BJW & RLG ceasing to be co-CEOs, but will be limited to (i) termination without cause, (ii) diminution of
title or responsibilities (including no longer reporting directly to CEO), or (iii) relocation.
II 

Calendar No. 26 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 558 

To prohibit the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency from 

awarding any grant, contract, cooperative agreement, or other financial 

assistance under section 103 of the Clean Air Act for any program, 

project, or activity outside the United States. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 13, 2013 

Mr. PAUL introduced the following bill; which was read the first time 

MARCH 14, 2013 

Read the second time and placed on the calendar 

A BILL 

To prohibit the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency from awarding any grant, contract, cooperative agreement, or other financial assistance under section 103 of the Clean Air Act for any program, project, 

or activity outside the United States. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Accountability in 

5 Grants Act of 2013’’. 


srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 558 PCS

1 SEC. 2. PROHIBITION AGAINST FUNDING CERTAIN FOR2 EIGN PROGRAMS, PROJECTS, AND ACTIVI3 TIES. 

4 Section 103 of the Clean Air Act (42 U.S.C. 7403) 

5 is amended by adding at the end the following: 

6 ‘‘(l) PROHIBITION AGAINST FUNDING FOREIGN PRO7 GRAMS, PROJECTS, AND ACTIVITIES.—The Administrator 

8 shall not award any grant, contract, cooperative agree9 ment, or other financial assistance under this section for 

10 any program, project, or activity that will be carried out 

11 outside the United States or the territories and posses12 sions of the United States.’’. 


srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS

srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Calendar No. 26 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 558 

A BILL 

To prohibit the Administrator of the Environmental 

United States. for any program, project, or activity outside the assistance under section 103 of the Clean Air Act tract, cooperative agreement, or other financial Protection Agency from awarding any grant, conMARCH 14, 2013 

Read the second time and placed on the calendar 


srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4023 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4023

 To extend until June 30, 1995, the temporary suspension of duties on 
          self-folding telescopic shaft collapsible umbrellas.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 11, 1994

 Mr. Portman (for himself and Mr. Smith of New Jersey) introduced the 
 following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To extend until June 30, 1995, the temporary suspension of duties on 
          self-folding telescopic shaft collapsible umbrellas.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF TEMPORARY SUSPENSION OF DUTIES ON SELF-FOLDING 
              TELESCOPIC SHAFT COLLAPSIBLE UMBRELLAS.

    Heading 9902.66.01 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United 
States is amended by striking out ``12/31/92'' and inserting ``6/30/
95''.

SEC. 2. EFFECTIVE DATE.

    (a) In General.--The amendment made by section 1 applies with 
respect to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, 
on or after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
    (b) Reliquidation.--Notwithstanding section 514 of the Tariff Act 
of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1514) or any other provision of law, upon proper 
request filed with the appropriate customs officer on or before the 
date which is 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, any 
entry, or withdrawal from warehouse for consumption, of an article 
described in heading 9902.66.01 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of 
the United States that was made--
            (1) after December 31, 1992, and before the 15th day after 
        the date of the enactment of this Act, and
            (2) with respect to which there would have been no duty if 
        the amendment made by section 1 applied to such entry or 
        withdrawal,
shall be liquidated or reliquidated as though such amendment applied to 
such entry or withdrawal.

                                 <all>
```
November 16, 2016

In accordance with the enclosed Memorandum Opinion, below is the judgment in the numbered cause set out herein to be entered in the Minutes of this Court as of the 16th day of November, 2016.

10-16-00129-CV	IN THE INTEREST OF C.C., J.C., JR., J.J.C., AND E.C., CHILDREN - ON APPEAL FROM COUNTY COURT AT LAW OF BOSQUE COUNTY - TRIAL COURT NO. CV14318 - AFFIRMED - Memorandum Opinion by Justice Davis:

“This cause came on to be heard on the transcript of the record, and the same being considered, because it is the opinion of this Court that there was no error in the judgment of the court below; it is therefore ordered, adjudged and decreed that the judgment of the court below be, and hereby is, affirmed.  It is further ordered that appellants pay all costs in this behalf expended, and that this decision be certified below for observance.”

# image1.png
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 173 (Thursday, September 6, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Page 45263]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-19320]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research; Notice of 
Closed Meetings

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended, notice is hereby given of the following meetings.
    The meetings will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial 
Research Special Emphasis Panel; FaceBase 3 SEP.
    Date: October 24, 2018.
    Time: 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, One Democracy Plaza, 6701 
Democracy Boulevard, Bethesda, MD 20892 (Telephone Conference Call).
    Contact Person: Crina Frincu, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, 
Scientific Review Branch, National Institute of Dental and 
Craniofacial Research, National Institutes of Health, 6701 Democracy 
Blvd., Suite 662, Bethesda, MD 20892, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#472421352e292432072a262e2b69292e2f69202831"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="6f0c091d06010c1a2f020e06034101060741080019">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Name of Committee: NIDCR Special Grants Review Committee; NIDCR 
Special Grants Review.
    Date: October 25-26, 2018.
    Time: 8:00 a.m. to 12:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: Cambria Hotel Washington, DC Convention Center, 899 O 
Street Northwest, Washington, DC 20001.
    Contact Person: Latarsha J. Carithers, Scientific Review 
Officer, Scientific Review Branch, National Institute of Dental and 
Craniofacial Research, Bethesda, MD 20892, 301-594-4859, 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#6c000d180d1e1f040d420f0d1e051804091e1f2c020504420b031a"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="ee828f9a8f9c9d868fc08d8f9c879a868b9c9dae808786c0898198">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.121, Oral 
Diseases and Disorders Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: August 30, 2018.
Natasha M. Copeland,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2018-19320 Filed 9-5-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04

- 15

- 00138

- CV

IN RE EL CABALLERO RANCH, INC

. and Laredo Marine, LLC

Original Mandamus Proceeding 1

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Marialyn Barnard, Justice Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice Jason Pulliam, Justice

Delivered and Filed: March 18, 2015

PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS DENIED

On March 12, 2015

, relators El Caballero Ranch, Inc. and Laredo Marine, LLC filed a

petition for writ of mandamus and a motion for emergency relief pending a ruling on the mandamus

petition. The court has considered the petition for writ of mandamus and is of the opinion tha t

r elators are not entitled to the relief sought. Accordingly, the petition for writ of mandamus and

the motion for emergency relief are denied

. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 52.8(a).

PER CURIAM

1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 13

- 04

- 00108

- CVL, sty led Grace River Ranch, LLC v. El Caballero Ranch, Inc. a/k/a El Caballero, LLC and Laredo Marine, LLC v. Robert W. Brittingham , pending in the 218th Judicial District Court, La Salle County, Texas, the Honorable Stella Saxon presiding.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Herminio Fraticelli, Appellant.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Westchester County (Nicolai, J.), rendered January 12, 1988, convicting him of burglary in the third degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant contends that the evidence was legally insufficient to establish his guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. We disagree.

*623At around 5:00 a.m., on April 10, 1987, moments after an alarm sounded, a Yonkers police officer saw the defendant with his arm partially through a jagged hole in the glass door entrance to a restaurant. After apprehending the defendant, the police noticed that both his hand and the glass door were bloody. The evidence was sufficient to establish that the defendant, who had no authorization to enter upon the premises, entered the restaurant with the intent to commit a larceny therein *(see,*Penal Law § 140.40; *People v King,*61 NY2d 550, 555; *People v Barnes,*50 NY2d 375, 381; *People v Mitchell,*151 AD2d 699).

We have examined the defendant’s remaining contention and find it to be without merit. Mangano, P. J., Lawrence, Rosenblatt and Miller, JJ., concur.
PRK-EX10.2(b)-2013.12.31-10K






Exhibit 10.2(b)


Schedule identifying Split-Dollar Agreements covering executive officers 
of The Park National Bank who are also directors and executive officers 
of Park National Corporation, which Split-Dollar Agreements 
are identical to the Split-Dollar Agreement, dated
May 17, 1993, between William T. McConnell and The Park National Bank


The following individuals entered into the Split-Dollar Agreements identified below, which Split-Dollar Agreements are identical to the Split-Dollar Agreement, dated May 17, 1993, between William T. McConnell, who is a director of each of Park National Corporation (“Park”) and The Park National Bank (“Park National Bank”), and Park National Bank, filed as Exhibit 10(f) to Park’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1993 (File No. 0-18772):




	
					
	Name and Positions Held With Park and Park National Bank
	 
	Date of Split- Dollar Agreement
	 
	Subsidiary of Park which is Party to Split-Dollar Agreement

	 
	 
	 
	 
	 

	C. Daniel DeLawder - Chairman of the Board and a director of Park; Chairman of the Board, a director and a full-time executive employee of Park National Bank
	 
	May 26, 1993
	 
	Park National Bank

	 
	 
	 
	 
	 

	David L. Trautman - President, Chief Executive Officer and a director of Park; President, Chief Executive Officer and a director of Park National Bank
	 
	September 23, 1993
	 
	Park National Bank
# C_2014425EN.01000302.xml

| 27.11.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 425/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.11.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 425/3

---

EUROPEAN POLICE COLLEGE

Publication of the final accounts for the financial year 2013

2014/C 425/04

The complete version of the final accounts may be found at the following address:

https://www.cepol.europa.eu/who-we-are/key-documents/final-accounts

---