alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.1

                           SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION

         In connection with the quarterly report of Big Clix, Corp. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2011 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Patrick Yore, President of
the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. SS. 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.

April 28, 2011                          /s/ Patrick Yore
                                        ----------------
                                        Patrick Yore, President, Principal
                                        Executive Officer, Principal Financial
                                        and Accounting officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 32.1

                      CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER CERTIFICATION
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

     In  connection  with this Annual  Report of CalPetro  Tankers  (Bahamas II)
Limited (the  "Company") on Form 20-F for the annual  period ended  December 31,
2003, as filed with the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission  (the "SEC") on or
about the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Tor Olav Troim, the Principal Executive
Officer and  President of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section
1350,  as adopted  pursuant  to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,
that:

     (1)  The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company.

     A signed  original  of this  written  statement  has been  provided  to the
Company and will be retained  by the  Company  and  furnished  to the SEC or its
staff upon request.

Date: June 8, 2004

/s/ Tor Olav Troim
------------------
Principal Executive Officer
To: "Gulledge, Bill" <Bill_Gulledge@americanchemistry.com>, 

Cc: John Schaeffer/DC/USEPA/US, 

Bcc:

Subject: HPV 2 Benzophenone CASRN 119-61-9 Time Extension Request from ACC Consortium

From: Paul Campanella/DC/USEPA/US - Thursday 09/27/2012 01:55 PM

Dear Mr. Gulledge, Based on our extensive discussion with you regarding the testing of 

this compound that included, inter alia, the evaluation of existing data, problems 

encountered in finding an available laboratory, scheduling and report preparation and 

review, the EPA is willing to extend the due date for submittal of the final reports to the 

requested time of June 28, 2013. Please notify us of any changes to the schedule that 

would enable you to submit the data at an earlier time for our review.

Paul J. Campanella, Ph.D.

Chemical Information and Testing Branch

Chemical Control Division

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

Washington, D.C. 

202-564-8091

----- Forwarded by Paul Campanella/DC/USEPA/US on 09/27/2012 01:55 PM -----

From: "Gulledge, Bill" <Bill_Gulledge@americanchemistry.com>

To: NCIC OPPT@EPA

Cc: Paul Campanella/DC/USEPA/US@EPA

Date: 09/17/2012 11:57 AM

Subject: Benzophenone HPV- Time Extension Request

Please see attached letter.

Bill

Bill Gulledge – Chemical Products and Technology Division

bill_gulledge@americanchemistry.com

American Chemistry Council |700 – 2

nd

Street NE |Washington, DC| 20002

O: (202) 249‐6714 |

www.americanchemistry.com

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ This message may contain confidential information and 

is intended only for the individual named. If you are not the named addressee do not disseminate, 

distribute or copy this email. Please notify the sender immediately by email if you have received 

this email by mistake and delete this email from your system. E-mail transmission cannot be 

guaranteed to be secure or error-free as information could be intercepted, corrupted, lost, 

destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses. The sender therefore does not accept 

liability for any errors or omissions in the contents of this message which arise as a result of 

email transmission. American Chemistry Council, 700 – 2nd Street NE, Washington, DC 20002, 
www.americanchemistry.com EPA- Time Extension Extension Request- Request- Sept 2012.pd 2012.pdf
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS

Appeals of

- )

)

Archer Western Aviation Partners )

) ASBCA Nos. 62035

- ADR, 62047

- ADR

62387

- ADR, 62388

- ADR

)

Under Contract No. W912DQ

- 14

- C

- 4006 )

APPEARANCE FOR THE APPELLANT : Steven D. Meacham, Esq.

Peel Brimley LLP

Henderson, NV

APPEARANCES FOR THE GOVERNMENT: Michael P. Goodman, Esq.

Engineer Chief Trial Attorney

Virginia Murray, Esq.

David Gasvoda, Esq.

Engineer Trial Attorneys

U.S. Army Engineer District, Kansas City

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

The dispute has been settled. The se appeal s are dismissed with prejudice.

Dated: August 9 , 2022

JAMES SWEET

Administrative Judge

Armed Services Board

of Contract Appeals2 I certify that the foregoing is a true copy of the Order of Dismissal of the Armed

Services Board of Contract Appeals in ASBCA Nos. 62035

- ADR, 62047

- ADR, 62387

- ADR, 62388

- ADR

, Appeals of Archer Western Aviation Partners , rendered in

conformance with the Board’s Charter.

Dated: August 9, 2022

PAULLA K. GATES

- LEWIS

Recorder, Armed Services

Board of Contract Appeals
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3996 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 3996

To suspend for the period January 1, 1994, to April 30, 1994, the duty 
                           on frozen onions.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 10, 1994

  Mr. Crane introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To suspend for the period January 1, 1994, to April 30, 1994, the duty 
                           on frozen onions.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. TEMPORARY DUTY SUSPENSION ON FROZEN ONIONS.

    Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of 
the United States is amended by inserting in numerical sequence the 
following new heading:
      

``  9902.07.11  Onions, frozen (provided                   No change        No change        On or before       
                 for in subheading                                                           4/30/94          ''
                 0710.80.97)............  Free                                                                 .

SEC. 2. EFFECTIVE DATE.

    (a) In General.--The amendment made by section 1 applies with 
respect to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, 
on or after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
    (b) Reliquidation.--Notwithstanding section 514 of the Tariff Act 
of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1514) or any other provision of law, upon proper 
request filed with the appropriate customs officer on or before the 
date which is 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, any 
entry, or withdrawal from warehouse for consumption, that was made--
            (1) after December 31, 1993, and before the 15th day after 
        the date of the enactment of this Act, and
            (2) with respect to which there would have been no duty if 
        the amendment made by section 1 applied to such entry or 
        withdrawal,
shall be liquidated or reliquidated as though such amendment applied to 
such entry or withdrawal.

                                 <all>
```
M A N D A T E

TO THE 377TH DISTRICT COURT of VICTORIA COUNTY, GREETINGS:

Before our Court of Appeals for the Thirteenth District of Texas, on the 30th day of

December, 2014, the cause upon appeal to revise or reverse your judgment between

The State of Texas, Appellant,

v.

Christopher Andrew Pena Appellee.

CAUSE NO. 13-14-00244-CR (Tr.Ct.No. 13-2-27,162-D)

was determined; and therein our said Court made its order in these words:

THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on appeal,

concludes that the judgment of the trial court should be AFFIRMED. The Court orders

the judgment of the trial court AFFIRMED.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

      

WHEREFORE, WE COMMAND YOU to observe the order of our said Court of Appeals

for the Thirteenth District of Texas, in this behalf, and in all things have it duly

recognized, obeyed and executed.

WITNESS, the Hon. Rogelio Valdez, Chief Justice of our Court of Appeals, with the seal

thereof affixed, at the City of Edinburg, Texas this 14th day of May, 2015.

Dorian E. Ramirez, CLERK

FILE COPY
**EXHIBIT 32**

 

May 14, 2012

 

Via EDGAR

 

Securities and Exchange Commission

Judiciary Plaza

450 Fifth Street, N.W.

Washington, D.C. 20549

 

Re:          Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

 

Ladies and Gentlemen:

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of VOC Energy Trust (the “Trust”) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2012 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, not in its individual capacity but solely as the trustee of the Trust, certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to its knowledge:

 

(1)           The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

(2)           The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Trust.

 

The above certification is furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350) and is not being filed as part of the Form 10-Q or as a separate disclosure document.

 
|   | The   Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A. |
|--------|---------------------------------------------------|
|   | Trustee   for VOC Energyl Trust                   |
|   |                                              |
|   | By:                                               | /s/   MIKE ULRICH |
|   |                                              | Mike   Ulrich |
|   | * *                                          | *Vice President and Trust Officer* |

 

1

----
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-21-00687-CV

In re Karen E. McRae

R. C. C. and N. T., Appellants

v.

Texas Department of Family and Protective Services, Appellee

FROM THE 274TH DISTRICT COURT OF HAYS COUNTY 

NO. 19,1739, THE HONORABLE DWIGHT E. PESCHEL, JUDGE PRESIDING

O R D E R T O S H O W C A U S E

PER CURIAM

This is a contempt proceeding ancillary to the appeal of N. T. The subject of this 

proceeding is Karen E. McRae, appellant’s attorney.

Appellant filed her notice of appeal on December 27, 2021, and her brief was due

March 8, 2022. On March 3, 2022, we ordered counsel to file appellant’s brief no later than 

March 16, 2022. To date, appellant’s brief has not been filed.

Therefore, it is hereby ordered that Karen E. McRae shall appear in person before 

this Court on Wednesday, April 13, 2022, at 1:30 p.m., in the Third Court of Appeals courtroom, 

located on the first floor of the Price Daniel, Sr. Building, 209 West 14th Street, in Austin, Travis 

County, Texas, to show cause why she should not be held in contempt and have sanctions 
2

imposed for her failure to obey our March 3, 2022 order. This order to show cause will be 

withdrawn and McRae will be relieved of her obligation to appear before this Court as ordered 

above if the Clerk of this Court receives appellant’s brief on or before April 11, 2022.

It is ordered on April 5, 2022.

Before Justices Goodwin, Baker, and Triana
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)

In connection with this Report on Form 10-Q for the three months ended December 31, 2012, or the Report, of PennantPark Floating
Rate Capital Ltd., or the Registrant, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Aviv Efrat, Chief Financial Officer of the Registrant, hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                
|----------------
|/s/ Aviv Efrat  
|Aviv Efrat      
|February 7, 2013
251 La. 1033

#### LOUISIANA STATE BOARD OF MEDICAL EXAMINERS v. Jerry R. ENGLAND.

No. 49168.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

March 27, 1968.

In re: Jerry R. England applying for writs of prohibition, certiorari and mandamus.

Application not considered. The applicant makes no showing that remedial writs have been denied by the Court of Appeal. This Court will not exercise its supervisory jurisdiction until the remedies in that court have been exhausted. See Moity v. Mahfouz, 242 La. 625, 137 So.2d 517 (per curiam).
II 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 538 

To amend title 10, United States Code, to modify the authorities and responsibilities of convening authorities in taking actions on the findings and 

sentences of courts-martial. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 12, 2013 

Mrs. MCCASKILL introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on Armed Services 

A BILL 

To amend title 10, United States Code, to modify the authorities and responsibilities of convening authorities in 

taking actions on the findings and sentences of courtsmartial. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. MODIFICATION OF AUTHORITIES AND RESPON4 SIBILITIES OF CONVENING AUTHORITIES IN 

5 TAKING ACTIONS ON THE FINDINGS AND 

6 SENTENCES OF COURTS-MARTIAL. 

7 (a) INCLUSION OF WRITTEN JUSTIFICATION FOR

8 CERTAIN ACTIONS ON SENTENCES.—Paragraph (2) of 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 538 IS

1 section 860(c) of title 10, United States Code (article 

2 60(c) of the Uniform Code of Military Justice), is amend3 ed by adding at the end the following new sentence: ‘‘In 

4 taking such an action (other than an action to approve 

5 a sentence), the convening authority or other person tak6 ing such action shall prepare a written justification of such 

7 action, which written justification shall be made a part 

8 of the record of the court-martial.’’. 

9 (b) PROHIBITION ON DISMISSAL OF FINDING OR

10 CHANGE TO FINDING OF GUILTY OF LESSER INCLUDED

11 OFFENSE.—Such section (such article) is further amend12 ed— 

13 (1) in paragraph (3), by striking the second 

14 sentence; and 

15 (2) by adding at the end the following new 

16 paragraph: 

17 ‘‘(4) If a convening authority or other person acts 

18 on the findings of a court-martial, the convening authority 

19 or other person may not— 

20 ‘‘(A) dismiss any charge or specification by set21 ting aside a finding of guilty thereto; or 

22 ‘‘(B) change a finding of guilty to a charge or 

23 specification to a finding of guilty to an offense that 

24 is a lesser included offense of the offense stated in 

25 the charge or specification.’’. 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 538 IS

1 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

2 this section shall take effect on the date of the enactment 

3 of this Act, and shall apply with respect to findings and 

4 sentences of courts-martial reported to convening authori5 ties under section 860 of title 10, United States Code (ar6 ticle 60 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice), as so 

7 amended, on or after that date. 

Æ 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

IN THE INTEREST OF A. G. and K. G.,

CHILDREN,

 

 Appellant. 

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

No. 08-21-00162-CV

Appeal from the

65th District Court

of El Paso County, Texas 

(TC# 2020DCM4548)

O R D E R

In order to protect the identity of the minor children who are the subject of this appeal, the 

Court has determined on its own motion that it is necessary to identify the children by their initials, 

A. G. and K. G., and the parent by initials as well, in all papers submitted to the Court, including 

letters, motions, and briefs. See Tex.R.App.P. 9..8. The Court will also refer to the children and 

parent by their initials in correspondence, orders, and in its opinion and judgment.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 22nd day of September, 2021.

PER CURIAM

Before Rodriguez, C.J., Palafox, J., and Marion, C.J. (Ret.)

Marion, C.J. (Ret.), sitting by assignment
#### Willie James LEWIS, Appellant, v. Louie L. WAINWRIGHT, Director, Division of Corrections, Appellee.

No. 71-1103.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

June 28, 1973.

Habeas corpus denied.
EX-10.12



 Exhibit 10.12 
 SUMMARY OF SALARIES FOR 
 NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS 

(as of December 31, 2013) 
 The following summarizes, as of December 31, 2013, the salaries of the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and the other officers who were named in the Summary Compensation Table in the proxy statement
for the Company’s 2013 Annual Meeting of Stockholders (the “Named Executive Officers”). 
 The executive officers
of the Company serve at the discretion of the Board of Directors. The Compensation Committee of the Board reviews and determines the salaries that are paid to the Company’s executive officers, including the Named Executive Officers. 

 

			
	 Named Executive Officer
	  	Salary
	 Steven G. Anderson
	  	$664,000
	 Chairman of the Board, President, and Chief Executive Officer
	  	
	 D. Ashley Lee
	  	$365,000
	 Executive Vice President, Chief Operating Officer, and Chief Financial Officer
	  	
	 Jeffrey W. Burris
	  	$293,000
	 Vice President and General Counsel
	  	
	 David M. Fronk
	  	$275,000
	 Vice President, Regulatory Affairs and Quality Assurance
	  	
	 Scott B. Capps
	  	$270,000
	 Vice President, Clinical Research
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3849 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 3849

  To amend section 3730 of title 31, United States Code, to limit the 
 amount a private party may be awarded in an action under such section.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 10, 1994

  Mr. Duncan introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend section 3730 of title 31, United States Code, to limit the 
 amount a private party may be awarded in an action under such section.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. AWARD LIMIT.

    Section 3730(d) of title 31, United States Code, is amended--
            (1) in paragraph (1), by inserting after ``settlement of 
        the claim'' the following: ``or $1,000,000 whichever is less'', 
        and
            (2) in paragraph (2), by inserting after ``settlement'' the 
        following: ``or $1,000,000 whichever is less''.

                                 <all>
```
### UNITED STATES ENVIRONMEN TAL PROTECTION AGENCY

REGION IX

ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD

PROPOSED RULE

Source Specific Federal Implementation Plan for Implementing Best Available Retrofit Technology for Four Corners Power Plant: Navajo Nation

Docket No. EPA-R09-OAR-0683

DOCKET INDEX

The docket for this proposed rule includes docum ents related to Four Corners Power Plant provided in the docket for the Advanced Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (Docket No. EPA-R09- OAR-2009-0598)

Docket Section or Item Date of Item

I. Documents Submitted by Facilities

 APS Submission to EPA plus attachments 1/2008

 APS Submission to EPA plus attachments 12/2008

 APS Submission to EPA plus attachments 3/2009

 APS Submission to EPA plus attachments 8/7/09

 APS Submission to EPA plus attachments 10/28/09

 APS Submission to EPA plus attachments 4/22/10

II. Documents from Affected States

 For comment letters and other doc uments from affected states, please see electronic docket number EPA-R09-OAR-2009-0598 at www.regulations.gov

III. Documents from Federal Land Managers

 For comment letters and other documents from FLMs, please see

electronic docket number EPA-R09-OAR-2009-0598 at www.regulations.gov

IV. Documents from Tribes and Other Stakeholders

 For comment letters and other documents from Tribes and Other Stakeholders, please see elec tronic docket number EPA-R09- OAR-2009-0598 at www.regulations.gov

V. Correspondence from EPA

 ANPRM Docket Index For correspondence from EPA, please see electronic docket

number EPA-R09-OAR-2009- 0598 at www.regulations.gov

VI. Documents Referenced in the Proposed Rule

 See Excel Spreadsheet entitled “TSD ref. LIST of Citations” 10/6/10

VII. Comments received during the ANPRM Comment Period

 List of Comments Received on ANPRM

 For comment letters and other documents received during the ANPRM comment period, please see electronic docket number EPA-R09-OAR-2009-0598 at www.regulations.gov

VIII. Proposed Rule

 Signed Proposal 10/6/10

 Technical Support Document 10/6/10

 Appendix A to Technical Support Document 10/6/10

 Appendix B to Technical Support Document 10/6/10

 Appendix C to Technical Support Document 10/6/10