47490 Federal Register / Vol. 49, No.' 235 / Wednesday, tDecdmber'5, 1984 / Rules and Regulations I

VI. Miscellaneous List of Subjects m40 CFR Part 52

, Airpollution control, Ozone, Sulfur oxides, Carbon monoxide, Hydrocarbons.

Authority. Secs. 101,107,110,116,171-178 and 301(a) ofthe Clean Air Act, as amended (42U.S.C. 7401, 7407, 7410,7416,7501-08, and 7601(a); sec. 129(a) ofthe Clean Air-Act Amendments of1977 (Pub.L No. 95-95, 91 Stat. 685 (August7,1977).

Dated: November 28,1984. William D.Ruckelshaus, Administrator.
[FR Doc. 84-3ii Piled 12-44W; 8:45am) BILLING CODE 6560-60-M

40 CFR Part 52

[A-9-FRL-2729-5] Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans;California State Implementation Plan (SIP) Revision
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). ACTION: Notice of final rulemaking.
SUMMARY: Today's notice takes final action to approve revisions to the rules of the North Coast Air Quality Management District (AQMD) and the Lake, Mendocino, Sacramento, San Diego, San Joaquin, San Luis Obispo and Shasta Counties and Monterey Bay Unified AirPollution Control Districts (APCD's). These revisions generally are administrative and retain the previous emission control requirements. EPA has reviewed these rules with respect to the Clean Air Act and determined that they should be approved. I DATE:This action is effective February 4, 1985. ADDRESSES: A copy ofthe revisions is available forpublic inspection during normal business hours at the EPA Region 9 office and at the following locations. California AirResources Board, 1102



### 'Q" Street, Sacramento, CA 95814 Public Information Reference Unit,

Environmental Protection Agency, 401 "M" Street, SW., Washington, D.C. 20460 EPA Library, Office ofthe Federal

-

Register, 1100 "L'Street,NW., Room 8401, Washington, D.C. 20460 Lake CountyAPCD, 255 North Forbes

Street, Lakeport, CA 95453 Mendocino CountyAPCD, Courthouse

Square, Ukiah, CA 95482 Monterey Bay Unified APCD, 1164

Monroe Street, Suite 10, Salinas, CA 93906 North Coast Unified Air Quality Management District, 5630 South Broadway, Eureka, CA 95501 Sacramento County APCD, 3701 Branch

Center Road, Sacramento, CA 95827 San Diego County APCD, 9150

Chesapeake Drive, San Diego, CA 92123 San Joaquin CountyAPCD, 1601 East

Hazelton Avenue, P.O. Box 2009, Stockton, CA 95201 San Luis Obispo CountyAPCD, P.O. Box

637, CountyAirport, Edna Road, San Luis Obispo, CA 93406 Shasta CountyAPCD, 1855 Placer Street,

Redding, CA 96001
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Thomas Rarick, Chief,State Implementation Plan Section, A-2-3, Air Management Division, Environmental ProtectionAgency, Region 9,215 Fremont Street, San Francisco, CA 94105, (415) 974-7641 FTS:454-7641. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Background

The ARB submitted as SIPrevisions the following rules on: March 14,1984
Lake CountyAPCD Rule 602 New Source Review
North Coast UnifiedAQMD Rule 100 Title Rule 120 Administration Rule 130 Definitions [Paragraplhs (dl)

and (s5]] Rule 160 Ambient AirQuality

Standards Rule 240 Permit to Operate Rule 500 Enforcement Rule 520 Civil Penalties Rule 600 Authorization Rule 610 Petition Procedures Appendix B-Continuous Monitoring
SanDiego County APCD Rule 2 Definitions Rule 52 Particulate Matter Rule 53 Specific Contaminants
SanJoaqum County APCD Rule 110 Equipment Breakdown Rule 202 Exemptions Rule 407 Sulfur Compounds April 19,1984 Mendocmno CountyAPCD Rule 1-100 Title Rule 1-120 Adminstration Rule 1-130 Definitions [Paragraphs

(dl) and (s5)] Rule 1-160 AmbientAir Quality

Standards Rule 1-240 Permit to Operate Rule 1-500 Enforcement Rule 1-520 Civil Penalties Rule 1-600 Authorization Rule 1-610 Petition Procedures Appendix B-Continuous Monitoring Rule g-101 Restrictions and

Description Rule 2-102 Exemptions Rule 2-200 Definitions Rule 2-301 Open Burming-Agricultural Rule 2-302 Open Burning-NonAgricultural Rule 2-303 Forecasts. Rule 2-304 Burning Permits Rule 2-305 Designated Fire Agencies Rule 2-401 Burning Preparation and

Restrictions Rule 2-501 Prohibitions Rule 2-502 Penalties
MontereyBay Unified APCD Rule 101 Rule 200 Rule 203 Rule 422 Definitions Permits Required Applications Burning ofWood Wastes

SacramentoCounty APCD
Rule 101 General Provisions and

Definitions Rule 102 Circumvention Rule 103 Exceptions Rule 403 Fugitive Dust Rule 404 Particulate Matter Rule 405 Dust and Condensed Fumes Rule 406 Specific Contaminants Rule 407 Open Fires Rule 408 Incinerator Burning Rule 409 Orchard Heaters Rule 410 Reduction ofAnimal Matter Rule 420 Sulfur Content ofFuels Rule 501 Agricultural Burning Rule 601 Procedure Before the Hearing

Board Rule 602 Breakdown Conditions;

Emergency Variances Rule 701 Emergency Episode Plan
SanLus Obispo County APCD
Rule 105 Definitions

ShastaCountyAPCD
Rule 1:2 Definitions Rule 2:2 State AAQS (repealed) Rule 2:3 Implementation Plans (repealed) Rule 2:6 Open Burning Rule 2:26 Emissions Calculation

Standards (repealed) Rule 2:27 Banking (repealed) Rule 3:2 Specific AirContaminants

These rule revisions, are administrative and they do not significantly impact current emission control requirements. They cover changes in permit requirements and expand categories ofexempt sources, provide new definitions as well as clarification and wording changes to reflect new boundaries.

HeinOnline -- 49 Fed. Reg. 47490 1984Federal Register 

### / Vol. 49, No. 235 1 Wednesday. December 5, 19111 / Rules and Regulations 47491

San Joaquin County Rule 202 exempts specific small emission units from the requirement for a permit to operate.The rule hasbeen amendedto lower the exemption size cut-offfrom 750 HP to 200HP forinternal combustion engines. The District has reformed EPA that the exemptions in Rule 202 would not exempt these units from any ofthe requirements oftheirnew source review regulations.

Thus, itis the purpose ofthis notice to approve and to incorporate theserules intothe Califorma SIP,with the exception ofportionsofRule 160 and Appendix Bforboth the North Coast Unified AQMD and the Mendocino APCD as discussed below.

Rule 160."AmbientAir Quality Standards." for theNorth Coast Unified AQMD andMendocino APCD is being approved with the followingexceptions: No action is being taken at this time on 160[a)since it doesnot apply inthe two distracts andit contains requirements fornon-criteria pollutants. Therefore, 160[a)is notappropriate for inclusionin the SIP.

Paragraph fD)[11e) ofAppendix B. "Continuous Monitoring, ofthe North Coast UnifiedAQMI) and the Mendocmo APCD are notbeing acted

on at this time since theyinclude Kraft Pulp Millsin the Standards of Performance in Monitoring Systems.

Additionally,ERA is taking this opportunity to rescind Shasta County APCD's Rules 2:2,"State Ambient Air Quality Standards"; 2:3, "Implementation Plans"; 2:26, "Emnissions Calculation Standards", and 2:27, '"Baning"

Evaluation

Under Section 110oftheClean Air Act as amended, and40 CFR Part 51, EPA isrequired to approve or disapprove these regulations as SIP revisions. All rules submitted, except those notbeing acted on at thistime have been evaluated andfound tobe m accordance with the CleanAirAct, EP policy and 40 CFR Part51. EPA's detailed evaluation ofthe submitted rules is available at the locations indicated in the ADDRESSES section of this notice.

EPA Action

This notice approves the rule revisions listed above and incorporates them into theCalifornia SIP.This is being donewithout prior proposal because therevisions are noncontroversial, have limited impacL and no comments are anticipated. The public should be advised that this actio will be effective 60 days from thedate 4 this Federal Register notice. However, i notice is received within 20 days that

someone wishes tosubmit adverse comments, the approval will be withdrawn and a subsequent notice will be published. The subsequent notice will indefinitely postpone the effective date. modify the final action to a proposed action, and establish a comment peried. Regulatory Process

The Office ofManagement and Budget has exempted this rule from the requirements ofSection 3 ofExecutive Order 1221.Under 5U.S.C. Section 605[b), the Administrator has certified that SIP approvals do not have a significant econormc impacton a substantial number ofsmall entities. (see 46FR 8709.)

Under Section 207(b)(1) of the Clean AirAct,petitions forjudicial review of this action must be filed in theUnited States Court ofAppeals forthe appropriate circuit by (60 daysfrom today). This action may notbe challenged later Inproceedings to enforce its requirements. (See 307[b)[2).)

Incorporation byreference ofthe State Implementation Plan forthe State ofCalifornia was approved by the Directorofthe Federal Register onJuly 1,1932.

Authority: Secr. 110 and 301(a) of lhe C ean AirAct, as amended [42 U.SC. 7410,7:02 and 76911a)).
ILstof Subjects-40 CFRPart ,2

AirPollution Control Agency, Incorporationby reference, Ozone, Sulfur oxides, Nitrogen dioxide, Lead. Particulate matter, Carbon monoxide, Hydrocarbons, Intergovernmental relations.

Dated Novembr28. 19L ,lliam D. Ruckelsaus. Adminzsfra.!r.

PART 52-AMENDED] Subpart F ofPart 52, ChapterLTitle

L 40 of theCode ofFederalRegulations is amended as follows: Subpart F-California

1. Section 52.220 is amended by adding paragraphs (c)(153) and {c)(154) toread as follows: §52.220 Identificatlen of plan.

(153)Revised regulations forthe following APCD's were submitted on March 14,1984 bythe Governor's designee.

n i Lake County APCD. of (A) New or amended Rule 602. .f (ii)NorthCoast Unified AQMD. (A) New oramended Rules 100. 120. 130 [Paragraphs (dl) and (s5)l. 160 (except 1a) and non-criteria pollutants). 24o ,50.50.o% 610 andAppendix B (except DlJlhj[e)).

(iii) San Die.o APCD. (A) New oramended Rules2 52and 53.

(iv) SanJeaquin APCD. (A) New oramended Rules 110.202 and407.

(154) Revised re lations for the folloving APCD's vweresubmitted on April19. 1P3 by the Governor's designee.

(i) Mendocino County APCD. (A) New or =-mnded Regalation I: Rules 100. 120.139 [Paragraphs (dl] and (sS}]. 169 (ecept (a) and non-criteria pollutants. 2a z91 52ii

. 69, 610 and Appendix B [e_.cept (D][l]{e)} and Regulatlen 2:Rules 101,102,200.

### 301,202. 303.304. 03 491. 591, andB02.

(ii) Monterey Bay Unified APCD. (A) New or amended Rules 101, 200, 203 and422.

(iii) Sacramento County APCD. (A) Nerw or amended Rules 101.102, 103.403-410,4Z0, 501.601.602 and 701.

(iv) San Lis Obispo County APCD. (A) New or amended Rule 103. (v) Shasta County APCD. (A) New or amended Rules 1:2.2:2 (repealed), 2:3 (repealed), 2:62:2- (repealed), 2:27 (repealed), and3"2-

J c_-1r

- -CZ =

40 CFR Part 1O

[PP 3F2.64/1R722PRL-2730-5]

Tolerances and Exemptions From Tolerances for Pesticide Chemicals in

or on RawAgricultural Commodities; Iprodlone

,AGENCy: Enviroe-mental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTUMo Final rule.

SUMMPARY.This ruleestablishes tolerances for thecombined residues of the funricida iprodione (3-{3.5- dichlorophanyl -X 1-methylethyl}-2.4- dioxo-1-tmldazolidinc-arboxamide]. its isomnr and its nonhydroxylated metabolite in oron certain raw agricultural and animal meat commodities. Tam regulation to establish maximum levels for residues ofthe p.sticide in oron the commodities

wcs rcqueated in a petition by RhonePoulenc. Inc.
EF ECTZVE DATm Effective on December 5. 19Z4.

HeinOnline -- 49 Fed. Reg. 47491 1984No. 235 / Wednesday, December 5. 1984 / Rules and Rei'ulatnnsi

ADDRESS: Written objections, identified by the document control number [PP 3F2964/R722]. may be submitted to the: Hearing Clerk (A-110), Environmental Protection Agency, Rm. 3708,401 M Street SW., Washington, D.C. 20460. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT. By mail: Henry M. Jacoby, Product

Manager (PM) 21, Registration Division (TS-767C), Environmental ProtectionAgency, 401 M Street SW., Washington, D.C. 20460 Office location and telephone number:

Rm. 227, CM#2,1921 Jefferson Davis Highway, Arlington, VA 22202 (703- 557-1900). SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

1.EPA issued anotice, published in the Federal Registerof November 23, 1983 (48FR 52974), which announced thatRhone-Poulenc, Inc., P.O. Box 125, Monmouth Junction, NJ 08852, had submitted pesticide petition 4F2964 to the EPA. This petitionrequested that the Administrator, pursuant to section 408(e) ofthe Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act,propose amending 40 CFR 180.399 by establishing tolerances for the combined residues ofthe fungicide iprodione in or on the following commodities:

a. Iprodione [r-(3,5-dichlorophenyl)-N- ,(1-methylethyl)-2,4-dioxo-1- imidazolidinecarboxamide], its isomer [3-{1-methylethyl) -N(3,5- dichlorophenyl-2,4-dioxo-1- imidazolidinecarboxamide] andits metabolite [3-(3,5-dichlorophenyl)-2,4- dioxo-1-imidazolidinecarboxamide] in
or on the raw agricultural commodity grapes at 60 parts permillion (ppm).

b. Iprodione and its nonhydroxylated metabolites (expressed as iprodione equivalents) in oron the commodities eggs at 0.8 ppm; fat, meat, and meat byproducts (exceptkidney and liver) of cattle, goats, hogs, horses, and sheep at 0.4 ppm, and kidney and liver ofcattle, goats, hogs, horses, and sheep at 3.0 ppm.

c. Iprodione and its nonhydroxylated and hydroxylated metabolites (expressed as iprodione equivalents) in
or on the commodity milk at 0.3 ppm.

2. Subsequently, EPA issued a notice, published in the Federal Register ofJune 6, 1984 (49FR 23445), which announced that Rhone-Poulenc Inc. amended the petition as follows:

a. Redesignating a tolerance for iprodione and its nonhydroxylated metabolites of0.4 ppm for fat (except poultry fat), meat, and meat byproducts (except liver and kidney) ofcattle, goats, hogs, horses,poultry and sheep, and 3 ppm for liver and kidney ofcattle, goats, hogs, horses, poultry, and sheep (except. poultry kidney). b. Adding tolerances for iprodione and its nonhydroxylated metabolites of 3.0 ppm for poultry liver and 2.0 ppm for poultry fat.

There were no comments received in response to these notices ofproposed rulemaking.

The data submitted in the petition and all otherrelevant material have been evaluated. The toxicological data considered in support of the tolerances, include (1) a three-generation rat reproduction study with a NOEL of500 ppm (25mg/kgbody weight/day), a reproductive LEL of2,000 ppm (100 mg/ kg body weight/day), hnd a systemic NOEL equal to or greater than 2,000 ppm (100 mg/kg body weight/day; (2) a rabbit teratology study in which the following doses were administered by gavage, 0, 100, 200 and 400mg/kg body weight, resulting in a teratogenic NOEL equal to orgreater than 400 mg/kg body weight; (3)a rat teratology study in which the following doses were administered by gavage, 0, 100, 200, and 400 mg/kg body weight,resulting in a teratogenic NOEL greater than 400 mg/ kg body weight; (4) a rat 24-month feeding/oncogenicity study using dosage levels of125, 250, and 1,000 ppm (6.25, 12.5, and 50mg/kg body weight/day), which showed no oncogenic effects under the conditions ofthe study at the highest dose tested; (5) an 18-month oncogenicity study in mice using dosage levels of200, 500, and 1,250 ppm (28.6, 71.4, 178.6 mg/kg body weight/day), which showed no oncogenic effects under the conditions ofthe study at the highest dose tested.

Data currently lacking include a second teratology study using gastric mtubation and mutagenecity studies including (1) DNA repair;, (2) gene mutation, mammalian, preferably in vitro; and (3)chromosomal aberration, mammalian, preferably in vitro.

The acceptable daily intake (ADI) based on the three-generation rat reproduction study (NOEL of25 mg/kg/ day) and using a 100 fold safety factor, is calculated to be 0.2500 mg/kg ofbw/ day. The maximum permitted intake (MPI) for a 60-kg human is calculated to be 15.00 mg/day. The theoretical maximum residue contribution (TMRC) from existing tolerances for a 1.5-kg daily diet is calculated to be 1.0708 mg/ day. The current action will utilize 3.48 percent of the ADI. These tolerances and the published tolerances utilize a total of10.62percent ofthe ADI.

The nature of the residues is adequately understood and an adequate analytical method, gas chromatography, is available for enforcement purposes. There are presently no actions pending against the continued registration of the chemical.

The pesticide is considered useful for the purpose for which the tolerances are sought. It is concluded that the tolerances will protect the public health and are established as set forth below,

Any person adversely affected by this regulation may, within 30 days after the date ofpublication ofthis regulation In the Federal Register, file written objections with the Hearing Clerk, Environmental Protection Agency, Room 3708 (A-110), 401 M Street, SW., Washington, DC 20460. Such objections must specify the provisions ofthe regulation deemed objectionable and the grounds for the objections. Ifa hearing is requested, the objections must state the issues for the hearing. A hearing will be granted ifthe objections are supported by grounds legally sufficient tojustify the relief sought.

As required byExecutive Order 12291, EPA has determined that this rule is not
a "Major" rule and therefore does not require a Regulatory Impact Analysis. In addition, the Office ofManagement and Budget (OMB) has exempted this regulation from the OMB review requirements of Executive Order 12291, pursuant to section 8(b) ofthat Order.

Pursuant to the requirements of the Regulatory Flexibility Act (Pub. L.90- 354, 94 Stat. 1164, 5U.S.C. 001-612), the Administrator has determined that the regulations establishing new tolerances

or raising tolerance levels or establishing exemptions from tolerance requirements do not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number ofsmall entities. A certification statement to this effect wag published in the Federal Register ofMay 4,1981 (40 FR 24950). (Sec. 408(e), 68 Stat. 514; (21 U.S.C. 346a(e)). List ofSubjects in 40 CFR Part 180

Administrative practice and procedure, Agricultural commodities, Pesticides and pests.

Dated: November 20,1984. Susan Sherman, ActingDirector, Officeof Pesticide Progrant.
PART 180--[AMENDED]

Therefore, 40 CFR 180.399 is amended by (1) adding the commodity grapes to paragraph (a), (2)revising the list of commodities in paragraph (b), and (3) revising the tolerance level for milk In paragraph (c) to read as follows: §180.399 Iprodlone; tolerances for residues

(a) * * * 47492 Federal Register / Vol. 49,

HeinOnline -- 49 Fed. Reg. 47492 1984Federal Register / VoL 49, No. 235 / Wednesday, December 5, 1934 / Rules and Regulations 47493

CoTmodes r

roe

Catu, fat GetS, kidney Cale. ttva" Catte,iaL Cattl%mbyp(except -. v, ld.ney) Eggs Goals, at Goats idney Goats. lter C-oats, rroa Goats. rtrnp(ecept -e. idney1) Hogs, fat Hogs. kidney Hogs, l-,er Hog, meat Hogs, rnbp (exc-pt -FIdy, ii.s) Ho.'ee, fat -orse% idney Horses, ve Horses, m esat

### ~ Hm' s% mbp J-eptkd-, rxz40

. .. Potry. fat Po-.ay. l

_ _ _ _ _ Pomljy.Teat Pouly.arbyplexcept W-1ne. IiEml Sheap, fat St-eA iddnoy Sheep. met Stleep. M." Sheep. rrbyp(excep fod--yr 1;-rj 0.4 3.0
as 0.4 0.4

0.4 30 ao 0.4 0.4 3.0

.n Q4 0.4 0.4 2D

0.4 A.4 2.0

as 0.4

1.4 0.4 :10 3.0
0.4 0.4

(c) A tolerance of0.3 part per million * * *

[FR Doc.5m4-Mn Fied 12-4-&::45 am)

BILuIM:a CODE 62.-50-U40CFR Part 180
[OPP-300095A; FRL-2730-8]

Tolerances and Exemptions From Tolerances for Pesticide Chemicals In

or on Raw Agricultural Commodities,Alpba-(P-NonyIphenyl}-OmegaHydroxypoly (Oxypropylene) Block Polymer With Poly(Oxyethylene)

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency {EPA). Acmon:Final rule.

SUrMARY: This rule expands the exemption from the requirement ofa tolerance for alpha-fp-nonylphenyl)- omega-hydroxypoly (oxypropylene) block polymerwith polyfoxyethylene) when used as a surfactant inpesticide formulations. Thisregulation -was requested by the Quaker Chemical Corp. EFFECTIVEDATE: Effective on December 5, 1984. ADDRESS: Written objections may be submitted to the: Hearing Clerk (A-110). -EnvironmentalProtection Agency, 401 M Street SW., Washington, D.C. 20460. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT. By mail: N. Ehushan Mandava,

Registration Support and Emergency Response Branch, Environmental Protection Agency, 401 M StreetSW., Washington, D.C. 20460 Office location and telephone number

Room716, CM "2,1921 Jefferson DavisHighway, Arlington, VA 22202, 703-557-7700.

SUPPLEMFiTARY INFORMATION: EPA issued aproposed rule,publish-d in the Federal P.egistcr ofSeptember 5, 1934 (49FR 35030), which announced that Quaker Chemical Corp. hadrequested that40 CFR 180.1001(c)be amended by expanding the existing exemption from the requirement ofa tolerance foracipha- (p-nonylphenyl)-omea-hydroxypoly (oxypropylene) block polymer withpoly (oxyethylene) (the entry appears incorrectly in the CFR because ofa typographical error-"alpha-pNonylphEnyl)-alpha * * " shouldread "alpha-p.Nonylphenyl).oma'a * a *). The ingredientis listed foruse as a surfactant inpesticide formulations, and the amendment would expand the polyoxypropylene content from 20-C0 moles to 10-60 moles, the polyoxyethylene content from 20--60 moles to 10-80 moles, and the molecular weight from 2,100-7,100 to 1,200-7,100.

Inert ingredients are ingredients that

are not active ingredients as defined in 40 CFR 162.3[c), andinclude, but are not limited to. thefollowing types of ingredients (except when they have a pesticide efficacy oftheir own): colvents such as water baits such as sugar, starches, and meat scraps; dust camera such as talc and clay; fillers; wetting and spreading agents; propellants in aerosol dispensers; and emulsifiers. The term "inert" isnotintended to imply nontoxicity; the ingredient may ormay not be chemically active.

There were no comments orrequests for referral to an advisory committee received m response to the proposed rule.

The pesticide is considered useful for the purpose for which the exemption is sought. It isconcluded that the exemption from the requirement ofa tolerance will protect the public health and is established as set forth below.

Any person adversely affected by this regulation may, within30 days after publication of this notice in the Federal Register,file written objections with the Hearing Clerk, at the address given above. Such objections should specify the provisions of the regulations deemed objectionable and the grounds for the objections. A hearing will begranted if the objections are supported by grounds legally sufficient tojustify therelief sought.

The Office ofManagement and Budget has exempted this rule from the requrements of etion 3 ofExecutive Order 1291.
(Scc. 42:[e). 3Slat. 514(21 U.S.C.'34a[ell}

List ofSubjects m 40 CFR Part 1C0
Administrative practice andprocedure, Agricultural commodities. Pesticides and pests.

Dated: Nambvc 3, 1 5,.4. Susan H. Shcraan. Actipe-D tor. OFce ofF e.deProram.:.

PART 18D--AMENDED]

Therafore, 40 CFRIS.131(c)is amended by revasing the entry aplha4oNonylphenyl}-&ph.- hydroxypolyfoaypropylene) block polymer v.ith poly~oxyethylene), toread

as follows.
§ 120.1001 Exemptions fromthe requirement of atolcrance.

lt=!_zit eC1~

10-C 

### {c}" ••

-=Z-3.= c: ._ ci 1tg-0

7,10

*:JJ;

. . =--a ,

40 CFR Part 180

[OPP-3903A; FRL-2720-41

Tolerances and Exemptions From Tolerances for Pesticide Chemicals In

or on Raw Agricultural Commoditie.. Certain PesticIde Chemicals

AIGENCY. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA].

ACTO:aFina rule.

su.iinY: These rules establish tolerances for residues of certain pesticide chemicals in oron the raw agricultural commodity red chicory (tops]. These regulations, established
upon the initiative ofthe EPA, set maximum permissible levels forresidues ofthe insecticide m oron the commodity.

HeinOnline -- 49 Fed. Reg. 47493 198447494 Federal Register / Vol. 49, No. 235 / Wednesday, December 5, 1984 / Rules and Regulations

EFFECTIVE DATE: Effective on December 5, 1984. ADDRESS: Written objections, identified by the document control number [OPP300098A], may be submitted to the: Hearing Clerk (A-110), Environmental Protection Agency, Rm. 3708, 401 M St., SW., Washington, D.C. 20460. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT. By mail:Donald Stubbs, Emergency Response and Minor Use Section (TS767C), Registration Division, Environmental Protection Agency, 401 M St., SW.,Washington, DC 20460.

Office location and telephone number:. Rm. 716B, CM #2; 1921 Jefferson Davis Highway, Arlington, VA 22202, (703- 557-1192).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: EPA issued two proposed rules, published m the Federal Register ofOctober 24, 1984, which announced thatupon the initiative ofthe EPA, the Agency proposed amending 40 CFR Part 180 by establishing tolerances forresidues of certain pesticide chemicals in or onred chicory (tops) in accordance with section 408(e) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act.

1. Section 1.0.153.EPAproposed (49 FR 42752) establishing a tolerance for residues ofthe insecticide O,O-diethyl O-(2-isopropyl-6-methyl-4-pyrmidinyl) phosphorothioate in or on the raw agricultural commodity red chicory (tops) (also known as radicchio, a salad crop only recently introduced for cultivation in the U.S.) at 0.7 part per million (ppm).

2. Section180.157. EPAproposed (49 FR 42754) establishing a tolerance for residues of the insecticide methyl 3- [(dimethoxyphosphmyl)oxy]butenoate, alpha and beta isomers in or on red chicory (tops) (also known a radicchio) at 0.5 partper million (ppm).

This action is in response to requests from growers of this minor crop for which there are currently no registered pesticides.

There were on comments nor request forreferral to an advisory committee received in response to the proposed rules.

The toxicological data and other relevant material have been evaluated and discussed in the proposed rules.

The pesticides are considered useful forthe purpose for which the tolerances

are sought. The Agency has determined that the establishment ofthe tolerances will protect the public health and are established as setforth below.

Any person adversely affected by these regulations may, within 30 days after publication ofthis document in the Federal Register, filewritten objections with the Hearing Clerk, at the address given above. Siuch objections should specify the provisions ofthe regulation deemed objectionable and the grounds for the objections. If a hearing is requested, the objections must state the issues for the hearing and the grounds for the objections. Ahearing will be granted ifthe objections are supported by grounds legally sufficient tojustify the reliefsought.

The Office ofManagement and Budget has exempted this rule fromthe requirements of section 3 ofExecutive Order 12291. (Sec. 408(d)(2), 68 StaL 512 (21 U.S.C. 346a(d)(2)))
List of Subjects m 40 CFR Part180

Admimstrative practice and procedure, Agricultural commodities, Pesticides and pests.

Dated: November 26,1984. Steven Schatzow, Director, Office of Pesticide Programs.
PART 180-[AMENDED)

Therefore, 40 CFR Part 180 is amended as follows:

1. In § 180.153 by adding and alphabetically inserting the raw agricultural commodity red chicory (tops) to read as follows: §180.153 0,0-Dlethyl O-(2-sopropyl-6- methyl-4-pyrimidinyl) phosphorothioate; tolerances forresidues.

Commodities Pas per

Chicory, red (tops) (also known as radlochio) 0. 7

2. In §180.157 by adding and alphabetically inserting the raw agricultural commudity red chicory (tops] to read as follows:
§180.157 Methyl 3- [(dimethoxyphosphlnyl)oxy]butenoate, alpha and beta isomers; tolerances for residues. Commodities Parts PC( milon

Chicory. rod (tops) (also known as radiccLo)... 0.5

[FR Doe. 84-31720 Filed IZ-4-.: 8:45amJ
BILLING CODE 6560-60-M

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Highway Administration

49 CFR Part 395

[BMCS Docket No. MC-99-1; Amdt. No. 83- 14]

Driver's Record of Duty Status; Correction

AGENCY: Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), DOT. ACTION: Correction ofeffective date and
comment period date.

SUMMARY: This document corrects the effective date and the comment period date ofthe final rule amendment to the driver's record ofduty status that appeared at page 46145 in the Federal Register ofFriday, November 23,1004 (49 FR 46145).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Neill L.Thomas, Bureau ofMotor Carrier Safety, (202) 426-9767, or Mrs. Kathleen S. Markman, Office of the ChiefCounsel, (202) 426-0346, Federal Highway Administration, 400 Seventh Street, SW.,Washington, D.C. 20590. Office hours are from 7:45 to 4:15 p.m. ET, Monday through Friday.

Beginning on page 46145 in the issue ofFriday, November 23, 1984, the dates "November 23, 1985" and "January 31, 1984" are hereby corrected to read as "November 23,1984" and "January 31, 1985." The date line, as corrected, now reads as follows: "This rule Is effective November 23,1984. Comments mustbe received by January 31, 1985." (49 U.S.C. 3102; 49 CFR 1.48)

Issued on: November 20,1984. Kenneth L. Pierson, Director, Bureauof'MotorCarrier Safotv, Federal HighwayAdmmnstration.
[FRDoc. 84-31081 Filed 12-4 4:8:45 am)

BILLING CODE 4910-22-M

HeinOnline -- 49 Fed. Reg. 47494 1984