alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

E. K. WADE, 

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

 v. 

ALEXANDER ACOSTA, Secretary; et al., 

Defendants-Appellees.

No. 18-15081 

D.C. No. 3:17-mc-80163-JD 

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of California

James Donato, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted June 12, 2018**

Before: RAWLINSON, CLIFTON, and NGUYEN, Circuit Judges.

E. K. Wade appeals pro se from the district court’s order denying Wade 

leave to file a complaint pursuant to a vexatious litigant pre-filing order. We have 

jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review for an abuse of discretion a prefiling order. Molski v. Evergreen Dynasty Corp., 500 F.3d 1047, 1056 (9th Cir. 

 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

FILED

JUN 21 2018

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 18-15081 

2007). We affirm.

The district court did not abuse its discretion in declaring Wade a vexatious 

litigant and entering a pre-filing order against him. See id. at 1057-61. The court 

provided Wade with notice and an opportunity to respond, discussed Wade’s 

numerous prior lawsuits, found the lawsuits to be frivolous and harassing, and 

narrowly tailored its order to address Wade’s particular abuses. See id. Contrary 

to Wade’s contention, the district court properly exercised its inherent power under 

the All Writs Act, 28 U.S.C. § 1651(a), to enter the pre-filing order. See Weissman 

v. Quail Lodge, Inc., 179 F.3d 1194, 1197 (9th Cir. 1999).

The district court did not abuse its discretion by declining to accept Wade’s

proposed complaints for filing because Wade’s proposed complaints fall within the 

scope of the prefiling order entered against him. See West v. Procunier, 452 F.2d 

645, 646 (9th Cir. 1971) (concluding that an order refusing to authorize filing of 

complaint was a “proper exercise of the district court’s authority to effectuate 

compliance with its earlier order”).

AFFIRMED.
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended
March 31, 2012 (the Report) of Solar Senior Capital Ltd. (the Registrant), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, NICHOLAS RADESCA, the Chief Financial Officer of the Registrant,
hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) The information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.



|      |  |                        
|----- |  | -----------------------
|      | 
|      |  | /S/    NICHOLAS
RADESCA
|Name: |  | Nicholas Radesca       
|Date: |  | May 1, 2012
Record of Discussion Docket No. FAA- Directorate I dentifier : -AD With whom outside the FAA has this action been discussed (i.e., Design Approval Holder , manuf acturer, ATA, NBAA, RAA, AOPA, ALPA , GAMA, etc)? ORGANIZATION PER SON CON TA CTED DATE TOPICS DISCUSS E D Lockh ee d Martin Ralph Sykes 8/ 20/ 2013 Conc ur . Lockh eed Martin Geof Bat e man 8/ 2112 013 Conc ur.

Other / Additional Inf o rmation :
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)

EXHIBIT 32.1

In connection with this Report on Form 10-Q for the three and six months ended March 31, 2016, or the Report, of
PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd., or the Registrant, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Arthur H. Penn, Chief Executive Officer of the Registrant, hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
as amended; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Registrant.



|                   |  |                        
|------------------ |  | -----------------------
|/s/ Arthur H. Penn
|Name:              |  | Arthur H. Penn         
|Title:             |  | Chief Executive Officer
|Date:              |  | May 5, 2016
----

COUNCIL RESOLUTION

of 9 December 2004

on Looking into the future of Information Communication Technologies (ICT)

(2005/C 62/01)

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Welcoming the Commission Communication on Challenges for the European Information Society beyond 2005 and the Commission Communication on Mobile Broadband Services,

Recalling

Acknowledging

CONSIDERS that for comprehensive and holistic ICT policies the following issues are relevant:

An excellent ICT sector and innovative businesses

ICT for Citizens and ICT skills

ICT for public services

Content and development of products and services

Development of networks

Trust and security

INVITES THE MEMBER STATES to actively review and enhance their strategic orientations and implementation efforts in order to contribute to a new Agenda for the Information Society towards 2010.

INVITES THE COMMISSION

INVITES INDUSTRY to continue to feed the market with innovative new ICT applications and services and produce attractive new content, inter alia benefiting from the European cultural diversity and multilingualism.

INVITES ALL STAKEHOLDERS to further integrate ICT in their respective activities in order to reap the full benefits of ICT.

SUBMITS the present Resolution as a contribution to the debate on the mid-term review of the Lisbon strategy by the Spring European Council 2005.

----
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.

Wniteb ~tate~ <tourt of ~peaI~

for tbe jfeberaI (!Circuit

IN RE CITY OF HOUSTON

2012-1356

(Serial No. 77/660,948)

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark

Office, Trademark Trial and Appeal Board.

ON MOTION

ORDER

The City of Houston moves without opposition for a

50-day extension of time, until December 14, 2012, to file

its reply brief.

Upon consideration thereof,

IT Is ORDERED THAT:

The motion is granted.

Case: 12-1356 Document: 31 Page: 1 Filed: 10/23/2012
IN RE CITY OF HOUSTON

s27

FOR THE COURT

/s/ Jan Horbaly

Jan Horbaly

Clerk

2

Case: 12-1356 Document: 31 Page: 2 Filed: 10/23/2012
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Denali Commission","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.denali.gov","author_name":"rdata","author_url":"https:\/\/www.denali.gov\/author\/rdata\/","title":"Programs","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"wGJgvNHNIO\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.denali.gov\/programs\/\">Programs<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.denali.gov\/programs\/embed\/#?secret=wGJgvNHNIO\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Programs” — Denali Commission\" data-secret=\"wGJgvNHNIO\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n"}
Exhibit 4.9

 

WRITTEN ACTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS

of
 CHS INC.

 

WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of CHS Inc. (the “Company”) has created a series of capital stock designated “Class B Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock” (the “Class  B Preferred Stock”), pursuant to a resolution adopted September 5, 2013 (the “Creation Resolution”), and has authorized the issuance of up to 20 million shares of the Class B Preferred Stock, Series 2, pursuant to a resolution adopted February 7, 2014 (the “Authorizing Resolution”);

 

WHEREAS, the Authorizing Resolution authorizes issuance of the Shares containing final pricing terms (including the initial dividend rate and period, the terms of any rate reset, the initial offering price per share, any no-call period, and the date from which dividends begin to accumulate) to be approved by a written action of this Board of Directors at the time of pricing of the Shares; and

 

WHEREAS, the pricing of the Shares has been concluded on acceptable terms and conditions.

 

RESOLVED, that this Board of Directors authorizes the issuance and sale of the Shares containing the following final pricing terms:

 

(1)         The affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the outstanding Shares, voting as a class, is required to approve any amendment to our articles of incorporation that relates solely to the Shares or to the resolutions establishing the specific economic terms of the Shares if such amendment adversely affects the powers, rights or preferences of the holders of the Shares.

 

(2)         A dividend rate of                                       percent (        %) per annum (equivalent to $        per annum per Share), until                                , 2024.

 

(3)         The issuance and sale of                                     Shares at an initial offering price of $      per Share.

 

(4)         A rate reset provision providing for adjustment of the initial dividend rate ten years after original issuance to be calculated as set forth in the Registration Statement (provided that the dividend rate shall not in any event be greater than 8% per annum).

 

(5)         The Shares shall be subject to a no call period of ten (10) years from their date of issuance, during which the Shares will not be subject to optional redemption by the Company.

 

1











 

(6)         Dividends shall be fully cumulative and shall accumulate without interest from and including                         , 2014.

 

2
---

Exhibit 32.1

|CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF
      FINANCIAL OFFICER
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                          
|PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,                                       
|AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO                                                    
|SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002                             

The undersigned, Joshua Bleak, the Chief Executive Officer, and
Bill Allred, the Chief Financial Officer, of Passport Potash Inc. (the Company),
each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to his knowledge, the
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended August 31, 2014, fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that the information contained in the
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

/s/
      Joshua BleakJoshua BleakChief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)Date: October 21, 2014/s/
      Bill AllredBill AllredChief Financial Officer(Principal Financial Officer andPrincipal Accounting Officer)Date: October 21, 2014


A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the
signatures that appear in typed form within the electronic version of this
written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Passport Potash
Inc. and will be retained by Passport Potash Inc. and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

__________

---
Exhibit 32 

Certification of CEO and CFO Pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

as Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of TPG Specialty Lending, Inc. (the “Company”) for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2016, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), Joshua Easterly and Michael Fishman, as Co-Chief Executive Officers of the Company, and Ian Simmonds, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to such officer’s knowledge: 

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

 

| /s/ Joshua Easterly |
|---------------------|
| Name:               |   | Joshua Easterly |
| Title:              |   | Co-Chief Executive Officer |
| Date:               |   | May 4, 2016 |

 

| /s/ Michael Fishman |
|---------------------|
| Name:               |   | Michael Fishman |
| Title:              |   | Co-Chief Executive Officer |
| Date:               |   | May 4, 2016 |

 

| /s/ Ian Simmonds |
|------------------|
| Name:            |   | Ian Simmonds |
| Title:           |   | Chief Financial Officer |
| Date:            |   | May 4, 2016 |

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.
Exhibit 32.3

ARC PROPERTIES OPERATING PARTNERSHIP, L.P.

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of ARC Properties Operating Partnership, L.P. (the Company) for the
fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2014 (the Report), I, William G. Stanley, Interim Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify to my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                    |  |  |  |     |  |                                
|------------------- |  |  |  | --- |  | -------------------------------
|Date: March 2, 2015 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/ William G. Stanley         
|                    |  |  |  |     |  | William G. Stanley             
|                    |  |  |  |     |  | Interim Chief Executive Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and
will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
- - 1

Defense Finance and Accounting Service 

Examples of Transfer Language for 

Box 14 

There are three examples of valid transfer 

modification language to include in Box 14 of a 

modification. 

11/22/2019 Integrity Service Innovation 
- -

 

 

Examples of Transfer Language for Box 14 

Please reference 3 examples of possible transfer language that can be used in 

box 14 of transfer modifications below: 

11/22/2019 Integrity Service Innovation 2
-78.5 -78.0 -77.5 -77.0 -76.5 -76.0 -75.5 -75.0

38.0 38.5 39.0 39.5 40.0 

### ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲


### ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ 500 1000 1500 1000 18 12 06 00 05/30 

### NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL 

## Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 30 May 07

EDAS Meteorological DataSource★at 39.41 N 76.30 WMeters AGL
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE
OFFICER AND PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT
OF 2002



The undersigned hereby certifies, in his
capacity as the Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer of Eastern Acquisition Corporation(the “Company”),
for the purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best
of his knowledge:



(1)           The
Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2012 (the “Report”) fully complies with
the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)           The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.



|Dated:   November 21, 2012 | /s/ Gregg Jaclin                                                                                           
|-------------------------- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                           | Gregg Jaclin, Chief Executive Officer
        (Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer)



This certification accompanies each Report
pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of §18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.



A signed original of this written statement
required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Alfred M. Perry, Appellant.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Miller, J.), rendered June 22, 1989, convicting him of robbery in the first degree, robbery in the second degree, and grand larceny in the fourth degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

During summation, defense counsel commented on the prosecutor’s failure to produce a videotape in which the defendant denied any involvement in the crime. The prosecutor, during summation, suggested that the defendant had the burden of producing the videotape. The defendant contends that he was deprived of a fair trial because of the prosecutor’s comment. We find no reversible error.

*859While the prosecutor’s comment was improper *(see, People v Sandy,*115 AD2d 27), the single, isolated comment during summation did not deprive the defendant of a fair trial since the evidence of the defendant’s guilt was overwhelming and there was no reasonable possibility that the jury would have acquitted the defendant had the comment not been made *(see, People v Crimmins,*36 NY2d 230, 241; *People v DeRosa,*137 AD2d 612; *People v Paul,*116 AD2d 746). We note that the trial court specifically charged the jury on the People’s burden to produce evidence and, further, instructed the jury that the prosecutor’s statement was to be disregarded.

We also find that the trial court’s sentence of the defendant to a term of six to eighteen years for the crime of robbery in the first degree was not an improvident exercise of its discretion *(see, People v Suitte,*90 AD2d 80, 85). Bracken, J. P., Kunzeman, Sullivan and Rosenblatt, JJ., concur.
Electronically Filed 

Supreme Court 

SCWC-10-0000243 

17-FEB-2012 

01:49 PM 

SCWC-10-0000243
 

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI'I
 

STATE OF HAWAI'I ,


Respondent/Plaintiff-Appellee,
 

vs.
 

WILLIAM A. DANIELS, JR.,


Petitioner/Defendant-Appellant.
 

CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS
 

(ICA NO. CAAP NO. 10-0000243; CASE NO. 1DTA-10-01712)
 

ORDER ACCEPTING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI
 

(By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, Acoba, Duffy, and McKenna JJ.)
 

Petitioner/Defendant-Appellant William A. Daniel, Jr.’s
 

application for writ of certiorari, filed on January 23, 2012, is
 

hereby accepted.
 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, that no oral argument will be 

heard in this case. Any party may, within ten days and pursuant 

to Rule 34(c) of the Hawai'i Rules of Appellate Procedure, move 

for retention of oral argument. 

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai'i, February 17, 2011. 

Timothy Mac Master for

petitioner/defendantappellant on the


application 

/s/ Mark E. Recktenwald

/s/ Paula A. Nakayama


/s/ Simeon R. Acoba, Jr.
 

/s/ James E. Duffy, Jr.
 

/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna
#### Joseph CAMPERLENGO et al., Petitioners, v. John Thomas DOOLITTLE et al., Respondents.

No. 39968.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Oct. 7, 1970.

Certiorari denied. 237 So.2d 82.

DREW, Acting C. J., and THORNAL, CARLTON, ADKINS and BOYD, JJ., concur.
ATTACHMENT HEADER SHEET

Attachment Number 033 Attachment Name CSGPE Environmental Safety Assessment

Associated PMN Section Number Pt.2, Sec.A, End

Contains CBI Report Number Sanitized Version

# All CBI has been removed
Exhibit 32.1  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with Amendment No. 1 to the Quarterly Report of ABC Acquisition Corp 1502 (the Company) on Form 10-Q/A for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report),I, Nitin Amersey, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:  (1)
     The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
  (2)
     The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the date and for the periods expressed in the Report.
  /s/ Nitin AmerseyNitin AmerseyChief Executive OfficerDecember 14, 2010
    The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.