From: Pitts, Tony

To: Hancy, Cindy Wang

Cc: Evans, Craig; Gross, Stephen (DEP)

Subject: Chromium Info: RRDonnelly

Date: Monday, March 07, 2011 2:58:41 PM

Attachments: RRDonnelly.pdf

Cindy,

Attached is the information received from R.R. Donnelly.

This should be the last of them. If you need anything else, feel free to contact me.

Tony

Tony A. Pitts | Air Quality Program Specialist

Division of Permits | Air Toxics and Risk Assessments

Department of Environmental Protection

Rachel Carson State Office Building

400 Market Street | Harrisburg, PA 17101

Phone: 717.772.3364 | Fax: 717.772.2303

www.depweb.state.pa.us
216 Greenfield Road

Lancaster, PA 17601

www.rrdonnelley.com

RR. DONNELLEY

February 24, 2011

Mr. Tony A. Pitts

Air Quality Program Specialist

Division of Permits

Air Toxics and Risks Assessments

Department of Environmental Protection

Rachel Carson State Office Building

400 Market Street

Harrisburg, PA 17101

Dear Mr. Pitts:

Enclosed, please find the requested Chromium Electroplating Information for RR

Donnelley, Lancaster East Plant. Also enclosed is the complete emission test

report from the October 25, 2005 test. •

If you have any questions or should require any additional information, please

contact me at (717)293-2056.

Sincerely,

s l'e-fry- g tiosimA--

Stacey Haefner

EHS Professional
Data Needed on Chromium Electroplating and Anodizing Facilities

Facility Data

Name — RR Donnelley Lancaster East Facility

Location — 216 Greenfield Road Lancaster, PA 17601

Number of employees — approximately 950

Type of electroplating facility (i.e., job shop, captive operation) — Batch operation

consisting of cylinder plating, cylinder removal, and cylinder replacement

Hours of operation — 24 hrs/day, 7 days/week 8760 hours/yr

Annual revenue -

Process Type(s)

Hard chromium electroplating : Hard Cr Electroplating

Decorative chromium electroplating

Trivalent chromium electroplating

Chromium anodizing

Other electroplating

Other co-located processes subject to NESHAP

Tank Design and Operation- Two (2) Chrome Plating tanks, manufactured by K Walter

Dimensions — length and width: 27.75 ft x 4.48 ft

Rectifier capacity — 20000 Amp; No limits on rectifier operation

Annual hours of operation

Permitted — No limits on annual operating hours

Actual —Typical: Tank 1 = 1106.73 hrs Tank 2 = 1127.98 hrs Year 2010

Emission Control Technology

Type of control method or control device — Composite mesh pad system with in-line

mist eliminators and HEPA filter

Exhaust system design (hood type/location, exhaust flow rate) — Hood Type:

Moveable On Top w/Fixed Duct Upper Tank Rear

Control device operating parameters (e.g., bath surface tension) — Pressure drop of

HEPA filter

Emission Test Data

Complete test report (if available)- See Attached

Other Available Supporting Documents

Emission inventory report

Permit application

Operating permitProcess flow diagram or sketch of plant layout
RR DONNELLEY

LANCASTER, PENSYLVANIA

STATIONARY SOURCE

SAMPLING REPORT

EMISSIONS TESTING FOR:

TOTAL CHROMIUM

Prepared for:

MR. DAVID YORK

RR DONNELLEY

216 GREENFIELD ROAD

LANCASTER, PENNSYLVANIA 17601

Prepared by:

AIR MONITORING SPECIALLSTS, INC.

PADEP # 68-03580

22 RODMAN ROAD

RICHMOND, VIRGINIA 23224

Project:

CHROME PLATING TANK

CONTROL DEVICE STACK TESTS

Test Date:

OCTOBER 25, 2005

11/22/2005
Signature:

ore-n4 2.71 2-0445

Bruce k Gerber

President

Air Monitoring Specialists, Inc.

Date:

REPORT CERTIFICATION

The sampling and analysis performed for this report were carried out under my direction

and supervision, and I hereby certify that, to the best of my knowledge, the test report is

authentic and accurate.
TABLEOFCONTENTS

PAGE

1.0 INTRODUCTION 1

1.1 Background 1

1.2 Outline of Test Program 1

1.3 Test Participants 1

2.0 SUMMARY OF RESULTS 2

Table 2-1 Total Chromium Emission and Process Data Summary 2

2:1 Presentation 3

2.1:1 Chrotnium Emissions Summary 4

2.1 .2 Example Calculations 5

3.0 PROCESS DESCRIPTION AND OPERATION 6

4.0 SAMPLING AND ANALYTICAL PROCEDURES 11

41 General 11

4.2 Sampling Points 11

4.3 Volumetric Air Flow Rates 11

4.3.1 Exhaust Gas Velocity 11

4.3.2 Exhaust Gas Composition 11

4.4 Emissions Determinations 11

4.4.1 Total Chromium 11

4.5 Equipment Calibration 12

5.0 QUALITY ASSURANCE/QUALITY CONTROL 12

5.1 General 12

5.2 Preventive Maintenance and Equipment Calibration 13

5.3 Sample Processing 13

5.4 Instrument Calibration 14

5.5 Blanks and Spikes 14

5.6 Internal/External System Audit Checks 15

5.7 Data Reduction and Validation 15

5.8 QA/QC Summary 16

APPENDICES

A Laboratory Data

B Field Data

C Calibration Data

D Process Data

11/22/2005
Chrome Plating Tank Outlet 

Chrome Plating Tank Outlet

EPA 306

EPA 306

October 25, 2005

October 25, 2005

RRD-M306-2

RRD-M306-3

TEST PARTICIPANTS

1.0 INTRODUCTION

1.1 BACKGROUND

R.R. Donnelley has hired Air Monitoring Specialist, Inc. (AMS) to conduct a test to quantify.

total chromium emissions from the printing cylinder chrome plating operation at their facility

located in Lancaster, Pennsylvania.

1.2 OUTLINE OF TEST PROGRAM

Stationary source sampling was performed on October 25, 2005 at the exit stack of the

chrome plating tank system. Table 1-1 is a test log that presents the sampling locations,

sampling objectives, sampling methods, test dates, and run numbers for the test program.

TABLE 1-1

TEST LOG

1.3 TEST PARTICIPANTS

Table 1-2 lists the personnel involved in the test program.

TABLE 1-2

1 11/22/05
2.0 SUMMARY OF RESULTS

TABLE 2-1

Total Chromium Emission and Process Data Summary

Hard Chromium Electroplating Tanks 3&4

TEST DATE 10/25/05 10/25/05 10/25/05

TEST RUN

NUMBER

RRD-M306-1 RRD-M306-2 RRD-M306-3

TEST 'TIMES 08:05-10:07 11:34-13:36 13:43-15:47

ELAPSED

SAMPLING T11%IE

120 120 120

Process and Control Device Data Summary Average

Pmure Drop Across System,

(in L120)

3.2 3.2 3.2 3.2

Tanks 3 & 4 Rectifier Rated

Capacity, (amperage)

20,000 20,000 20,000 N/A

Tank 3 Rectifier Capacity,

(amperage)

12,200 12,200 12,200 12,200

Tank 4 Rectifier Capacity,

(amperage)

11,560 11,560 14,667 12.596

Sampling/Stack Data Summary Average

02 Concentration, (% by volume, dry) 20.9 20.9 20.9 20.9

CO2 Concentration, (% by volume, dry) 0 0 0 0

Sample Volume, (dscf) 120.119 108.245 108.970 112.445

2 11/22/05
Required Sample Volume, (dscf) 72 72 72 N/A

Stack Gas Moisture, (%) 1.89 2.17 207 2.04

Stack Gas Temperature, ("F) 87.4 79.6 79.1 82.0

Volumetric Flow rate, (dscfm) 4983.1 4582.0 4613.4 4726.2

Isokinetic Rate, (%) 102.92 100.86 100.85 101.54

Permitted Isokinetic Rate, (%) 90-110 90-110 90-110 N/A

Toatal Chromium Emission Results Average

Total Chromium Emission Catch, (mg) 0.00977 0.006145 0.00621 0.0074

Total Chromium Emission Rate, (lb/hr) 0.000054 0.000034 0.000035 0.000041

Total Chromium Emission

Concentration, (gr/dscf)

0.0000013 0.0000009 0.0000009 0.0000010

Total Chromium Emission

Concentration, (mg/dscm)

0.00287 0.002 0.00201 0.00230

Allowable Total Chromium Emission

Concentration, (mg/dscm)

0.015 0.015 0.015 0.015

2.1 PRESENTATION

The average total chromium concentration in the stack gas from the composite mesh pad

control system controlling the chrome-plating tank during the compliance test at the

Lancaster Facility was 0.0023 milligram total chromium per dry standard cubic meter

(mg/dscm). Table 2.1.1 presents the emission rates and concentrations for the test program.

Table 2.1.2 contains example calculations.

Appendix A contains the laboratory data. Appendix B contains the field data and Appendix

C contains the calibration data. Appendix D contains the process data

3 11/22/05
2.1.1 CHROMIUM EMMISIONS SUMMARY

'Chromium Suppling Train Calculations

Client It it Donnelley

Project Lancaster, PA

Date: October 25, 2005

SCRUBBER OUTLET--

Test Number. RRD-M306-1 RRD-M306-2A RRD-M306-3 Averages

Pitot Tube Calibration Factor 0.84 0.84 0.84

Meter Calibration Factor. 1.031 1.031 1.031

Start Time: 08:05 11:34 13:43

Stop Time 10:07 13:36 15:47

Stack Diameter, inches: 18 18 18

Nozzle Diameter, inches: 0251 0.251 0.251

Barometric Pressure, inches mercury. 29.78 29.8 29.79

Static Pressure in Stack, Inches Water. -0.26 -023 -027 -025

Duration of Sample, minutes: 120 120 120

Meter Leak Rate, CFM: 0 0.000 0.000

Meter Start Volume, CF: 313.564 497334 603.629

Meter Final Volume, CF: 428.976 603.341 710.575

Average Meter Pressure, Inches Water. 3.044 2.538 2.563 2.715

Average Meter Temperature, degrees F: 64.5 743 75.3 71.4

Average Sqrt Velocity Pressure: 0.8688 0.7947 0.7993 0.8209

Stack Gas Temperature, degrees F: 87.4 79.6 79.1 82.0

Percent Carbon Dioxide: 0 0 0 0

Percent Oxygen: 20.9 20.9 20.9 20.9

Percent Carbon Monoxide: 0 0 o 0

Liquid Volume Collected, milliliters: 48.8 50.6 48.6 493

Total Weight of Chromium, Milligrams: 0.00977 0.006145 0.00621 0.0074

'Sample Train Calculations

Meter Volume, Actual: 115.412 106.007 106.946 109.455

Meter Volume, STP: 120.119 108245 108.970 112.445

Meter Volume, STP (68 deg. F, 29.92 in. HA 3.402 3.065 3.086 3.18

Volume of Water Vapor Condensed, CF: 2313 2.398 2304 2338

Total.Gas Sampled, CF: 122432 110.643 111274 114.783

Percent Moisture: 1.89 2.17 2.07 2.04

Area of Stack, Square Feet 1.767 1.767 1.767

Density Dry at STP: 0.0746 0.0746 0.0746 0.0746

Density Wet at STP: 0.0740 0.0739 0.0740 0.0740

Density Wet at Stack Cond: 0.0713 0.0723 0.0724 0.0720

bokinetic, V.: 102.92 100.86 100.85 101.5412

Molecular Weight, lb/lb-Mole: 28.84 28 84 28 84 28.84

IV .0 and BOW °ambitions

Average Stack Gas Velocity, FPM: 2,995.7 2,721.0 2,735.6 2,817.4

Stack Gas Flow Rate, ACFM: 5,293.9 4,8083 4,8342 4,978.8

Stack Gas Velodly, SCFM: 5,079.1 4,683.6 4,711.0 4,824.5

Stack Gas Velocity, DSCFM: 4,983.1 4,582.0 4,613.4 4,7262

laronahun Calculadons:

Grains Per DSCF: 1254E-06 8.753E-07 8.787E-07 1.003E-06

LBS/FIR: 5.356E-05 3.438E-05 3.475E-05 4.090E-05

mg/DSCM 0.00287 0.00200 0.00201 0.00230

Standard Conditions 68 degrees F 29.92 inches Hg

11/22/2005
31:11181/X3 °y am:tumm

pm up s ns pylo sa ' : Zet1+091=

 agarA o Ati r P Ja A IS

SOLIS Inn•INAJninn

"

lap 62 -

Vaualm.°3 

86 1 -11 niY * nun

, OZEI*ZE3Z01 srasatt0'0=

=PIS AnI ninn ;ELS ‘ 6Z.S.LSA096+61$3)/8ZSMZE6ZAZ10+9TI/81

sin811 PA 4010• :111nPV 

9IH-LI1:1=

191/9ZEI=

000U96Hs09.6111=,

OVE11-00141£11000/(00I*000L.(0001/9t9)

lumPonSS 3 •0 PIP nun 89 P nanan a afar , ne w14 $

INaMlighn

REH/SWI

riarao aaJ aasa :

StEla001/GCEI-000

11A099+1 rafIZA466Z1(ZIEI-149'81/£10Th= 7 41

SC11.£111--

98•OZHA(ICEI)111609600=

6•91319S 4P4 111/13S0 1

: MOS `i1P0P

*PA 1

ann nne A 

swavins m Iso ua * Piaav :

 anans11 16 5 1" 1 9n0 PA 0 4P q

IIMPAI a P U SO PL) OP• 11 0410

6981491:13-=

IRSSEL013•EIE61 Z1114041.411:1•0£S446IAZAU1111),01.1M/KEE8.(099-1I ZU/46"6Z*001)).=

LEEIAZ66Z/09II/t110+Z ItIB•0099-1-1Z11)/0£0=

(001/1113).i940'04001/(17£11-001))49£2).=

o.acaa-zza-ooraitza,Lci ta+(eza,L280.0) . vu.o g ooli

Okfl- * (4ti(ZAvoiti))

oote(Evaaca

autea upui p swa

WM11111101 0 I3.1 unn n tun

Wen M 0m 3011 23 1 13 la nO1In nin

:approuoyi omptra Pantaa

=ACE° ;wand

.oppong Dogma Anna

ap hnoendusaj, no rnn g saa

8 nannAV 6 /*WA 1 41 nann1

ai, nn aSensv p anstradt l :g matilop 

Wow? al a tunss l aP = 1W 11 1

"PIN dnla AnI caum 13 :

Ing181Snll A01 omo ' 33

"PP1 1 117 WI 1 ' N.33 :

unIP1InCI O SJ dUV l uib l nu I 32

n9n18 d unanal ! n MS V1 311 S In 218/Yi 3

:Amman iptiout 'among °mamma

012201%1 93 uln P gin PS A =

:saga! trasunna Imo

dov :alum 

ni MS mi

AVIS 3t 4xi a M3 g -30P

a *SAL 1011d n Er nInn no t1 nP10 - zalinnO/1821 "WU 031 ni nn CZ ` SOK 

:PaFnIcl l noun n sa va 

 703113 -a 71 G anun "H

1.0111110.014 S na 11 2• 11 •1 • 3•I nn I nO nun

LL600.0

811,

0

0

8898'0

C179

not

9L61Z4

P9StIE

0

OZI

9t0-

8t6Z

ICZ-0

81

LOOT

5080

I£01

17W0

-9011X-Mal

anlonatnIS PA1 2 11*1 1 111 1 141- 0 1

63112•11041

PM Anaa I RS V I F / DOP:

Irma Pm n i as :

Lamina ahP 

 WV 0 8S1 3n 1 4 S anab d an n
3.0 PROCESS DESCRIPTION AND OPERATION

OF CHROMIUM PLATING TANKS AT LANCASTER EAST

The sources tested were two (2) hard chromium-electroplating tanks, manufactured by K.

Walter Corporation (Plan Approval Source ID 401). Both plating tanks can be operated

simultaneously. The tanks are used to plate a thin layer of chromium, approximately 7

microns, onto the engraved copper surface of gravure printing cylinders for wear and

corrosion resistance.

A non-production or "dummy" 100" cylinder was plated in Tank #3. Plating times ranged

from 14 minutes to 18 minutes. The average plating time in tank #3 was about 16 minutes.

The rated rectifier capacity of tank #3 is 20,000 amps. The average rectifier capacity of tank

#3 during the test was 12,200 amps.

Production cylinders were plated in tank #4. One hundred inch (100") and one hundred

thirty-one inch (131") cylinders were plated during the test periods. Plating times ranged

from 15 minutes to 18 minutes. The average plating time for these cylinders in tank #4 was

about 17 tninutes. The rated rectifier capacity of tank #4 is 20,000 amps. The average

rectifier capacity of tank #4 during the test was 12,596 amps

The plating operation is a batch operation consisting of cylinder plating, cylinder removal,

and cylinder replacement. The overall average time, in which there was no plating, was about

15.5% of the time or about 9 minutes per hour. The overall average percent of time when one

cylinder was being plated was 43.4% of the tune or about 26 minutes per hour. The overall

average percent of time when two cylinders were being plated was 41.1% of the time or

about 25 minutes per hour.
15.5% of the time not

11.3% plating (during cylinder

change out, replacement,

etc.

18.8%

56.4% 43.4% of the time plating

one Linder 27.9% 45.9%

32.3% 41.1% of the time plating

two cylinders 55.7% 35.3%

Almost 10 cylinders

total 10 cylinders total during

a two hour run

(eight 100 inch

cylinders and two

131 inch tinders

almost 11 cylinden total

(all 100 inch

cylinders)

20,000 amps 20,000 amps

12,200 amp

20,000 amps

12,200 amps 12,200 maps

20,000 amps 20,000 saps 20,000 amps

11,560 amps 14,667 amps 12,5% amps

11/22/05

The following table summarizes the plating operation during the test:
Tank 3 I

8:05 8:15 830 8:46 9:00 9:15 9:30

plating nonproduction 6 4

1

2 "dummy"

cylinders 815 8-18 822 8:40 825 9:01 9:05 920 9:22 9:38

100" 100"

cy5nder 9170 Tank 4

100" 100" 100"

Plating

production I woln

not 4 11

cylinders Plane

8:18 8:25 8:42 8:50 9:08 9:10 927

9:40 9:58

100*

9:45 10:00 10:07

11

12

9:38 925 10:07

11:30 11:45 1200 1215 1230 1245 tea 1:15

;11:34

10 7

1127 11:63 me rzts

100' tar

31 min not plating

I_ I

11:2411:

100-

cylinder size

120 12,

7

1225 1243 1245 121 122 128 125

100" 100 100" 10r

12-08 1220

100"

1240 1256 1259 1:15

ror lar 11:34 ras

The following are timelines of the plating process during the three

RUN #1 (1012512005 from 8:05 to 10:07 AM) or 122 minutes

plating no cylimders: 8:16 & 8:42-8:45=3 & 9:56-10:07=11

20 minutes or 16.4%

plating one cylinder: 8:22-8:25 = 3 & 8:40 -8:42=2 & 8:45-8:5 5 & 9:01-9:05= 4 & 9:06-

9:10= 4 & 920-9:22= 2 & 9:27-9:311 & 9:38-9:40 = 2 & 9:55-9:56=1

34 minutes plating one cylinder or 27.9%

plating two finders: 8:058:1111 & 8:25-8:40 = 15 &8:509:01 =11 & 9:05-9:06=1 &

9:10-9:20=10 & 9:22-9:27=5 & 9:40-9:55=15

68 minutes plating two cylinders or 55.7%

RUN #2A (10/25/2005 from 11:34 AM to 1:36 PM or 122 minutes)

11:15 Tank 3

plating nonproduction

"dummy"

cylinders

Tank 4 plating production

cylinders

plating no cylinders: 11:36-11:37=1 & 11:53-12:010 & 12:20-12:25 & 1:18-1:25=7

23 minutes or 18.8%

plating one cylinder: 11:34-11:36=2 & 11:37-11:53=16 & 12:03-12:02 & 12:18-12:20 ='2 &

12:25-12:40=.15 & 12.43-12:45=2& 1256-12:52 & 1:01-1:02=1 &

1:15-1:18=3 & 1:25-1:36*11

56 minutes plating one cylinder or 45.9%

plating two cylinders: 12:05-12:18=13& 12:40-12:43=3 & 12:45-12:56=11 & 12:58-1:01=3

& 1:02-1:15=13

43 minutes plating two cylinders or 35.3%

11/22/2005
220 Z-15 220 2:45 320 Tank 3 1:431'45

plating non

production

"dummy"

cylinders

2

2.48 303

2ELM 11 ta.

120 2:08 2:10 2:25 225 22$ 3:05

Tank 4

plating

production

100'

cylinder

sin

37 ninny' pang

100-100" 100"

nin not plain. tal4 V4

cylinders 2:20 229 322

100"

3:19

131"

315 3:30 345

347

3:19 322 3:33 3:40 3:55

100" 100" 1

13

322

13r

3.47

RUN #3(1012512005 from 1:43 to 3:47 PM) or 124 minutes

plating no cylimders• 1 •43-1:517 & 2:08-2:10=2 & 2:46-2:48=2 & 3:19-3:22=3

14 minutes or 11.3%

plating one cylinder: 1:50-2:08=18 & 2:10-2:210 & 2:25-2:29=4 & 2:38-2:46=8 &

2:48-3:02=14 & 3:03-3:05=2 & 3:22-3:32=10 & 3:36-3:40=4

70 minutes plating one cylinder or 56.4%

plating two cylinders: 2:20-2:25=5 & 2:29-2:38=9 & 3:023:01 & 3:05-3:114

3:323:34 & 3:40-3:47=7

40 minutes plating two cylinders or 32.3%

EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM

The chrome plating process generates a mist containing chromic acid. A fan draws room air into both plating

tanks, through the emission control system, and exhausts the air to atmosphere. Midwest Air Products Co.,

Inc. (MAPCO) manufactures the chromium emission control system. Each tank is exhausted through a

dedicated in-line MAPCO 3K mist eliminator. Air from each mist eliminator is then combined, directed to a

MAPCO Ultra MACT 5K composite mesh pad system and high efficiency particulate filter (HEPA), through

a constant speed fan, and out to atmosphere through a stack.

The following table summarizes the pressure drops across the control system during the test

Run #1 Run #2 Run #3 Overall average

Pressure drop 3.2 3.2 3.2 3.2

inches of

water column

The following diagram illustrates the major components of the emission control system and the location of

the pressure drop that was recorded during the test.

9 11/22/05
ir ID Exhaust Stack

two 3" Sampleff reverse

Ports. 90 degrees apart

Single speed

( Plating Tank 14

ezzanine

Plating Tank 193

Me

Pd

nit

sr9 Pressure

Gauge

Plating Room

RR Donnelley

Lancaster East (2005)

10 11/22/05
4.0 SAMPLING AND ANALYTICAL PROCEDURES

4.1 GENERAL

All sampling analytical procedures were those recommended by the United States

Environmental Protection Agency. This section provides brief descriptions of the sampling

and analytical procedures.

4.2 SAMPLING POINTS

The number and location of the sampling points were determined according to the procedures

outlined in EPA Method 1. The stack cross sections were divided into equal areas with equal

points on each traverse axis. The field data sheet for the traverse location can be found in

Appendix B of this report.

4.3 VoLumEnttc Am FLOW RATES

4.3.1 Exhaust Gas Velocity

The exhaust gas velocity and volumetric flow rate were determined according to the

procedures outlined in EPA Method 2. Velocity head measurements (delta P) were made

using Type S Pitot tubes conforming to the geometric specifications outlined in EPA Method

2. Accordingly, each has been assigned a coefficient of 0.84. Differential pressures were

measured with an oil manometer. Exhaust gas temperatures were measured with chromelalumel thermocouples equipped with digital readouts.

4.3.2 Exhaust Gas Composition

The exhaust gas was assumed to be at ambient conditions 20.9 percent oxygen and 79.1

percent nitrogen.

4.4 EMISSIONS DETERMINATIONS

4.4.1 TOTAL CHROMIUM

Sample Collection. Samples were withdrawn isokinetically from the source using an EPA

Method 306 sampling train. The sampling train consisted of a glass nozzle, a heated glass

probe with a Type S Pitot tube and Type K thermocouple attached, four chilled impingers,

and a metering console. The first and second impingers each contained 100 ml of 0.5 N

NaOH, the third remained empty, and the fourth contained pre-weighed silica gel. A

schematic of the sampling train is located in Appendix B.

Sample Recovery. The pH of the impinger solution in the first impinger was measured at the

conclusion of the test nm. The pH of the first impinger solution for the three test runs were

11 11/22/05
13, 12 and 12 The first, second and third impingers were weighed and the weights were

recorded on the sample recovery data form. The silica gel was returned to the original preweighed container, weighed, and the weight recorded on the sample recovery data sheet. The

volume of water vapor condensed in the impingers and the volume of water vapor collected

in the silica gel were summed and entered into moisture content calculations. The contents of

the first impinger were transferred to a 500-mL sample bottle. The nozzle, probe, first

impinger and all connecting glassware were rinsed three times with 0.5 N NaOH into the

500-mL sample bottle containing the contents of the first impinger. The contents of the

second and third impinger were transferred to a second 500-mL sample bottle. The second

and third impingers, along with the connecting glassware, were rinsed three times with 0.5 N

NaOH into the second 500-mL sample bottle. The sample bottles were sealed with Teflon

tape, the liquid level was marked and the sample information logged on the chain of custody

form.

Sample Analysis. EPA Method 306 analytical procedures were used to analyze the samples

for total chromium using ICP-MS as outlined in the method. Element One, Inc.(PADEP if

683085) of Wilmington, NC, (910) 793-0128, analyzed the samples.

4.5 EQUIPMENT CALIBRATION

Pertinent calibration data are provided in Appendix C.

5.0 QUALITY ASSURANCE/OUALITY CONTROL

5.1 GENERAL

Air Monitoring Specialists, Inc (AMS) is committed to the continued implementation of a

Quality Assurance Program to assure the quality of sampling and analytical procedures of

environmental measurement data The Quality Assurance measures taken during this test

project equal or exceed the minimum QA/QC recommendations as set forth by the U.S.

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) for a particular method. The following sections

outline the QA program implemented by AMS to justify the validity of test procedures. As

applicable, the QA system for the various test programs addresses the following areas:

Preventive Maintenance & Equipment Calibration

Sample Processing

Analytical Instrument Calibration

Blanks and Spiked Samples

Internal/External System Checks

12 11/22/05
• Data Reduction & Validation

QA/QC Summary

5.2 PREVENTIVE MAINTENANCE AND EQUIPMENT CALIBRATION

An effective preventive maintenance program decreases downtime and thus increases data

completeness and quality. Pretest and posttest equipment calibrations are conducted in a

manner and at a frequency, which meets or exceeds U.S. EPA specifications.

Each item transported to the field is inspected to detect equipment problems that may

originate during periods of storage. All equipment returning from the field is cleaned,

repaired, reconditioned, and recalibrated as necessary. Routine maintenance on equipment

(dry gas meters, pumps, manometers, Pitot tubes, and nozzles) is carried out periodically for

leaks, corrosion, dents, or any other damage

5.3 SAMPLE PROCESSING

AMS employs systems that ensure the integrity of an environmental sample from the time of

acquisition, through analysis, and ultimately to proper disposal. These systems are necessary

to allow valid conclusions to be drawn from analytical results separated in time and space

from the sampling operation. In addition, these systems recognize that samples are

occasionally of value even after analytical results have been reported.

Samples are collected, transported, and stored in clean containers that are constructed of

materials inert to the analytical matrix. Containers are used which allow airtight seals. When

necessary, containers are employed which prevent photochemical reactions. All sample

containers are labeled with the following information:

Unique source identifier

Sample run identifier

Analyte identifier

Sample matrix identifier

Sample analyst identifier

Additional information relating to the sample is recorded on the data sheet for the sampling

run that afforded the subject sample. Accordingly, the sampling data sheet contain,: all the

information listed above, plus the date and times the sample was acquired and supplemental

information such as observations pertinent to the quality of the sample. For condensed

samples, e.g., samples in liquid media, the sample levels are marked on the outside of the

adjusting results accordingly.

13 11/22/05
For transport from the field to the laboratory, samples are stored in sealed containers and

secured in a fashion that minimizes movement and thus prevents breakage of containers.

Containers used for transporting glass are packed with foam. Samples that require chilling are

kept cold until analyzed.

Samples remain in the custody of the sampler, from acquisition until conveyance to the

sample custodian. All custody transfers are signed and documented on a record of custody

form, which remains with the sample until turned over to the custodian. Analytical data are

identified in a manner identical to that of the sampling data. Accordingly, all data generated

from the analysis of samples are documented with the following information:

Source identifier

Sample run identifier

Analyte identifier

Sample matrix identifier

Analyst identifier

Analysis date

Portions of samples remaining after analysis are returned to their original sample containers.

These samples are stored in designated storage areas until their destruction is authorized.

5.4 INSTRUMENT CALIBRATION

Instrument calibration is one of the most important fimctions in generating precise and

accurate quality data.

All of the contract laboratories involved in the analytical testing for the test program maintain

rigorous QA programs for instrument calibration.

5.5 BLANKS AND SPIKES

Field blanks, method blanks, trip blanks, lab-proof blanks and filter blanks are obtained,

digested and analyzed when applicable. The blanks reflect the background contamination

obtained from the various sources during the sampling and analysis. Thus, data adjustment or

correction can be made accordingly.

In most cases, it is not necessary to digest and analyze the method blanks, reagent blanks, or

the lab-proof blanks unless the field blank shows a high level of contamination. If a high level

of contamination is present, it is imperative to individually analyze the above blanks to help

determine the cause of contamination. Spiked samples are used to check on the performance

14 11/22/05
of a routine analysis or the recovery efficiency of a method. During spiking, a known amount

of stock solutions of the substance of interest is added to the sample prior to sample

extraction, digestion, and analysis.

5.6 INTERNAL/EXTERNAL SYSTEM AUDIT CHECKS

System and performance audits are routine elements of all AMS QA/QC programs.

Internal Systems Audit: The following sampling equipment checks were conducted prior to

sample collection.

All sampling equipment was thoroughly checked to ensure clean and operable components.

Equipment was inspected for possible damage from shipment.

The oil manometers were leveled and zeroed.

The temperature measurement systems were checked for damage and operability by

Measuring the ambient temperature.

Performance Audits: Performance audits of the laboratory are conducted prior to the

processing of any compliance samples for analysis. Audit materials typically include samples

available from the EPA prior to new source testing. In addition, samples of known

concentration are prepared in-house or obtained from the EPA for Internal QA checks.

External Systems Audits: AMS is subject to a system audit each time a test is conducted for

any Air Pollution Control agency. This procedure entails an observer on-site to do qualitative

evaluation of performance to demonstrate compliance with the applicable regulations.

5.7 DATA REDUCTION AND VALIDATION

The test team leader is responsible for reviewing and validating data as they are acquired.

Each team leader has extensive knowledge of sampling methodology and the characteristics

of the process being measured and is capable of evaluating the accuracy, representativeness,

and completeness of raw data on-site, Action to replace inadequate data can be taken

immediately.

Data obtained during calibrations and test runs are recorded on standardized forms that are

checked twice for completeness and accuracy by the QA Director or his designated

representative. Data reduction and consistency are achieved by using the standardized forms

and using AMS's in-house computer facilities.

15 11/22/05
16 11/22/05

EPA Method 306: A blank sampling train was analyzed for chromium with 0.88 micrograms

detected.

5.8 QA/QC SUMMARY

All chemicals used were American Chemical Society (ACS), High Performance Liquid

Chromatography (HPLC), or pesticide grade. The deionized, distilled water utilized met or

exceeded the American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) specifications for Type-I

reagent water. Pretest and posttest leak checks were conducted on each sampling train.
Appendix A

Laboratory Data
Air Monitoring Specialists

22 Rodman Road

Richmond, VA 23224

Project ID: Mapco Scrubber

Total Chromium

EPA Method 306 Analysis

Analytical Report

6146

ell Element One, Inc.

5022-C Wrightsville Av., Wilmington, NC 28403

910-793-0128 FAX: 910-792-6853 el lab@el lab.com
40

elissa L 

:

CIA Officer

November 10, 2005

The following data for Analytical Report 6146

has been reviewed for completeness, accuracy,

adherence to method protocol,

and compliance with quality assurance guidelines.

Review by:

Report Reviewed and Finalized By:

Ken Smith, Laboratory Director

November 10, 2005

elementOne
SUMMARY OF RESULTS

• eleinentOne

.••,..•:k•L;c5 ft1-3C16
Summary of Analysis

Probe and First ImpingerSummary of Total Chromium Analysis

Element

RRD-1

e6146-1

Total pg

RRD-2 RRD-2 RRD-3

e6146-3 e6146-3 dup e6146-7

Total pg Total pg Total pg 

Total Chromium 2.05 1.88 1.75 1.85

Element

Second and Third ImpingerSummary of Total Chromium Analysis

RRD-1 RRD-2 RRD-3 RRD-3 RRD-Blank

e6146-2 e6146-5 e6146-9 e6146-9 dup e6146-9 dup

Total pg Total pg Total pg Total pg Total pg 

Total Chromium 7.72 6.38 4.23 4.36 0.88

eiementOne
ANALYTICAL NARRATIVE

elementOne
Element One Analytical Narrative

Client: Air Monitoring Specialists Element One #: 6146

Client ID: Mapco Scrubber Analyst CMS

Method: M306 Dates Received: 10/28/05

Analytes: Total Chromium Dates Analyzed: 11/04/05

Summary of Analysis

The samples were prepared according to Method 306 protocol. Total Chromium

was analyzed on a PerkinElmer ELAN 6100 ICP-MS.

Detection Limits

The ICP-MS instrument reporting limit was 2.5pg/L for chromium.

Analysis QA/QC

Duplicate analyses relative percent difference (RPD), spike sample recovery, and

second source calibration verification data are summarized in the Quality Control

Section. All QA/QC data was within the criteria of the method.

Additional Comments

The reported results have not been corrected for any blank values or spike

recovery values. Nothing unusual was noticed with any of the samples or

analyses.
QUALITY CONTROL SUMMARY

elementOne
Summary of Quality Control Data

Total Chromium Duplicate Analysis RPD and Spike Recoveries

(Method 306 QC limits: <10% for RPD and ±25% for Spike Recoveries)

Probe/Innp.1 Imp. 2 & 3 Imp. 2 & 3 Probe/Imp.1

RPD-2 RPD-3 RPD-2 RPD-3

Element RPD RPD Recovery Recovery

Chromium 6.9% 3.0% 101% 102%

Second Source Calibration Check Recoveries

(Method 306 QC limits: ±10% for Continuing Check Standard')

Element 1 ppb 100 ppb* 200 ppb

Total Chromium 94% 97% 95%

elementOne
SAMPLE CUSTODY

elementOne
(a9 /41P

Element One, Inc., CHAIN OF CUSTODY Phone 910-793-0128

5022-C Wrightsville Av. Air Emissions Samples FAX 910-792-6853

Wilmington, NC 28403 Email ellab©hotmail.com

Client AIR MONITORING SPECIALISTS, INC. Pro'ect rnerco

Plant &WNW- Ira r PO A --1 - Date

Custodian

c • 0 arPlant address IMAIMINIMMIN

A'? favor 1 Ar 'T17,41 ellecearerc,,,,

Sample

Box ID

Custody

Seal # Run Number Fraction ID Tare

Op —106— 1 —a-J-4c_ ii,&QM -t. 1*-- :rm 4, ,-, I

Alp— 306— I 22.14 2.14 -i- ? _is? 1--,, ea.,- ..-f It' 2-

r ir• -

 2- . - 4- Jr - -. - °

R&D- ?oh -2- ..i,, t 2-ce ,77... -44..- e 1-1

keP - ,7,-3 'o. Sr. -

kftp - 106- ? 2 t- ,?iii>....., riel

....,-,, .ti A

t P ILIP-3)4 -giant. / 4." .,11- 114-44' ot 1

Received b • Si•nature Com•a

- amass:Ss dir.

Da e , - - • e Condition

Kra

sikirmi,, I 01 W. _ a omit_

ement one, Inc. Form 120 - Revision 0.
ANALYTICAL DATA

• elementOne

-•••••(.s..;,,1;•.5,r)
Client: AMS Date / Time Received: 10.28.05 1300

One AIR TESTING SAMPLE SUBMISSION FORM Lab ID 6146

Analysis Maximum Completion Date: 11.09.05 QA/QC/Report Maximum Completion Date: 11.10.05

Project ID/ Number: Marco Scrubber

HNO3 Lot: r /OSOIYO Ref. Method:

Volume Marke Y‘ N Volume Loss Y pH > 12 C5 N 306

Sample Identification Sample Identification

RRD-M306-R1 Probe & 11 7 RRD-M306-R3 Probe & 11

2 RRD-M306-R1 12 & I3 RRD-M306-R3 Probe & 11 Spike

3 RRD-M306-R2 Probe &II 9 RRD-M306-R3 12 & 13

4 RRD-M306-R2 Probe &11Duplicate 10 RRD-M306-R3 12 & 13 Duplicate

5 RRD-M306-R2 12 & 13 11 RRD-M306-Blank

6 RRD-M306-R2 12 & 13 Spike

Analyses Requested: Samples 1-6 Total Chrome

NOTE:

Front Half Back Half HNO3 (A) KMnO4 (B) HCI (C)

SAMPLE BV,

ml

FV,

ml BV, ml Used FV, ml BY, ml FV,

ml BV, mi FV,

ml BV,

ml

FV,

ml

1 ,1,4psi, 

t,2-3S"

Aye

At')

--...,,_

2

3/4 4J-fa, A-x i -

516 'a0 'alde

--„,,,sLt

c

718 -.1saa rob --„,,..:NL it 

10-S--, 9/10 s!),A/%1.- 1`)/oc. --,,,

11C v/ /0!

. , , • Q 3 cf.-WO

. , ..- 1.-IP

,Az5

a 

4 U IS-0

Y4VC:

hi ita

Comments: q,A,..„. ,,,,„7,,,,,,,..,.w„,. ..k .

c„,A,,,,,,,.....5,-..4-; et.,04-.v.A.ciAlzs -,--E 4-02, s4,..ta#, co....a c

itsicae..„-z. A 

)2,7trtiois-A tie tp...7..-jg.7 bt,'

.-. .-W---,.:frw--.. .

tA._. zaz

ement , Inc.. ormForm - Revision

1 of 1

Sample Submission by r4.` 11/4/2005 12:43:41 PM
Sample/Batch Report

User Name: christine.selak

Computer Name: ICPMS1

Sample File: C:\elandata\Sample\MMTL.sam

Report Date/Time: Friday, November 04, 2005 15:55:50

A IS Loc. Batch ID Sample ID Description Sample Type Init. Quant. Prep. Vol. Aliquot Vol. Diluted Vol. Solids Ratio

14 6146-1 AMS

15 6146-2 AMS

16 6146-3 AMS

17 D 6146-3 AMS QC Duplicate

18 6146-5 AMS

19 S 6146-5 AMS Spike- 1

20 6146-7 AMS Sample

21 S 6146-7 AMS Spike - 1

22 6146-9 AMS

23 D 6146-9 AMS QC Duplicate

24 6146-11 AMS

25 LRB

26 S LRB Spike - 1

Page 1
Dataset Report

User Name: christine.selak

Computer Name: ICPMS1

Dataset File Path: C:\elandata\Dataset\110405-5\

Report Date/Time: Friday, November 04, 2005 15:55:46

Autosampler Position: 3

The Dataset

Time Sample ID Batch ID Read Type Description Init. Quant Prep. Vol. Aliquot. Vol. Diluted NJ

14:39:46 Fri 04-Nov-05 Blank Blank

14:41:15 Fri 04-Nov-05 Standard 1 Standard #1

14:42:45 Fri 04-Nov-05 Standard 2 Standard #2

14:44:17 Fri 04-Nov-05 Standard 3 Standard #3

14:45:48 Fri 04-Nov-05 QC Std 1 QC Std #1

14:47:18 Fri 04-Nov-05 QC Std 2 QC Std #2

14:48:49 Fri 04-Nov-05 QC Std 3 QC Std #3

14:50:19 Fri 04-Nov-05 QC Std 4 QC Std #4

14:51:50 Fri 04-Nov-05 QC Std 6 QC Std #6

14:53:21 Fri 04-Nov-05 QC Std 7 QC Std #7

14:54:52 Fri 04-Nov-05 QC Std 8 QC Std #8

14:56:24 Fri 04-Nov-05 QC Std .9 QC Std #9

14:57:56 Fri 04-Nov-G5 QC Std 10 QC Std #10

14:59:27 Fri 04-Nov-05 6146-1 Sample AMS

15:00:56 Fri 04-Nov-05 6146-2 Sample AMS

15:02:25 Fri 04-Nov-05 6146-3 Sample AMS

15:03:55 Fri 04-Nov-05 6146-3 D QC Duplicate AMS

15:05:24 Fri 04-Nov-05 6146-5 Sample. AMS

15:06:54 Fri 04-Nov-05 6146-5 S Spike - 1 AMS

15:08:24 Fri 04-Nov-05 6146-7 Sample AMS

15:09:54 Fri 04-Nov-05 6146-7 S Spike - 1 AMS

15:11:25 Fri 04-Nov-05 6146-9 Sample AMS

15:12:56 Fri 04-Nov-05 6146-9 D QC Duplicate AMS

15:14:26 Fri 04-Nov-05 QC Std 1 QC Std #1

15:15:56 Fri 04-Nov-05 QC Std 4 QC Std #4

15:17:28 Fri 04-Nov-05 6146-11 Sample AMS

15:18:58 Fri 04-Nov-05 QC Std 1 QC Std #1

15:20:28 Fri 04-Nov-05 QC Std 4 QC Std #4

15:50:07 Fri 04-Nov-05 LRB Sample

15:51:38 Fri 04-Nov-05 LRB S Spike - 1

15:53:07 Fri 04-Nov-05 QC Std 1 QC Std #1

15:54:37 Fri 04-Nov-05 QC Std 4 QC Std #4

Page 1
elementOne ICP-MS RUN SHEET 6146

Analyst: _CMS Date: 11-04-05 Solid Samples q / Liquid Samples

A/S

Loc

Batch

# for

sample

sets

Sample

Lab ID

Sample

Description

Type

Sample

QC Spike

QC Dup 

QC Reg

Blank

Spike . cmcentrati°

Prep

Volume

(ml)

Weight

(g)

Aliquot

(ml)

Dilute

d to

Volu

me

(ml)

12 LRB S 100

13 LRB SS Table #1 100

14 6146-1 S 100

15 6146-2 S 100

16 6146-3 S 100

17 6146-3 SD 100

i 18 6146-5 S 100

19 6146-5 SS Table #1 100

20 6146-7 100 

21 6146-7 SS Table #1 100

22 6146-9 S 100

23 6146-9 SD 100

24 6146-11 S 100

Dilutions and Rechecks

25 LRB S 100

26 LRB SS Table #1 100

Spikes are at 0 2 mL of 25ppm spiking solution lot 021405-A in a final volume of 100m1.

Submitted for

QC:

Date:

\•D

Time:

Wien

QC Review: Date.

11.1-19

Time:

10: 3D

1-J.32)

Re-Test

Required:

Yes: Cols:

Resubmitted

for QC:

Date: Time: By: QC Review: Date: Time: By:

Element One, Inc. Form 126 - Revision 0.0
100

100

100

.4)

ELAN Instrument ontro ession - uantt a ore Ana ysis Mel o m - CAE: an ata'1/4 e otht r jamw.ni u Lillie

ER6

it•

4,165,i6 14.4,'6 talAeogoiropiii...AS

4[ Talitij2

UN'

ilfaTatilre-3

rig.)

Spik6 Talc 3

Datiniig

S p I ke suite

dai

1 Li

2 Sc

3 Cr

4 Cr

5 Hu

6 Kr

6.0151

'44.9559 50

51.9405 50

,52.9407 '50 ,t1164.93

1823141 '50

fr

ittrObsakagaJdAqtilt kcapratistfaagriipio:.ititmiliAi.::*seugraatispike Tables AOC:APtIticqntr01sAAutogarlipiej.

- - :" !CAP) :LOCI-7 '7

a Statik 0 [fit 0:::t 0 Gp :::;Ii‘i ELAN I nstrumenttort.. ELI4NEditiReplocess.SO41,701jdoso(t Wald - I CRIS . !RD 12,4(,-(3)4?%(i4 am Pm:
Method 6020 & 200.8 Metals Summary Report

Sample ID: Blank

Sample Da Friday, November 04, 2005 14:39:46

Sample Description:

Concentration Results

Analyte Mass Meas. Inter Conc. Meat Report Unit

Li

6 23972 7 ppb

Sc 45 48373.1 ppb

I Cr 52 3293.9 ppb I Cr 53 7263.4 ppb

I> Rh 103 109864 2 ppb

Ho 165 227196.7 ppb

Kr 83 105 PPb

Method 6020 & 200.8 Metals Summary Report

Sample ID: Standard 1

Sample Da Friday, November 04, 200514:41:15

Sample Description:

Concentration Results

Analyte Mass Meas. Inter Conc. Meat Report Unit

Li6 24637.8 ppb

Sc 45 44626.7 ppb

Cr 52 4797.9 0.93051 ppb

Cr 53 8132.1 4.01452 ppb

I> Rh 103 110664 ppb

Ho 165 237561.1 ppb

Kr 83 92.7 ppb

Method 6020 & 200.8 Metals Summary Report

Sample ID: Standard 2

Sample Da Friday, November 04, 2005 14:42:45

Sample Description:

Concentration Results

Analyte Mass Meas. Inter Conc. Meat Report Unit

Li

6 25492.8 ppb

I- Sc 45 42574.9 ppb

Cr 52 157599.1 96.50562 ppb

Cr 53 27632.2 100.377 ppb

I> Rh 103 111028.6 ppb

Ho 165 244210.4 ppb

Kr 83 100.3 ppb

Method 6020 & 200.8 Metals Summary Report

Sample ID: Standard 3

Sample Da Friday, November 04, 200514:44:17

Sample Description:

Concentration Results

Analyte Mass Meas. Inter Conc. Meat Report Unit

Li

6 25313.3 ppb

Sc 45 44519.9 ppb

I Cr 52 785798 500.699 ppb I Cr 53 106003.3 499.9186 ppb I> Rh 103 108577 1 ppb

Ho 165 247833.3 ppb

Kr 83 107.3 ppb

Method 6020 & 200.8 Metals Summary Report

Sample ID: QC Std 1

Sample Da Friday, November 04, 2005 14:45:48

Sample Description:

Concentration Results

Analyte Mass Meas. Inter Conc. Meat Report Unit

Li6 26205 ppb

Sc 45 34637.4 ppb

Cr 52 3562.7 0.09198 ppb

Cr 53 9563.3 9.76451 ppb

Rh 103 114009.9 ppb

Ho 165 253599.6 ppb

Kr 83 101.7 ppb

elementOne 8 6146 1 of 7
Method 6020 & 200.8 Metals Summary Report

Sample ID: QC Std 2

Sample Da Friday, November 04, 2005 14:47:18

Sample Description:

Concentration Results

Analyte Mass Meas. Inter Conc. Meai Report Unit

Li6 27181.3 ppb

Sc 45 36226.7 ppb

Cr 52 4951.3 0.94097 ppb

I Cr 53 10273.1 13.26449 ppb I > Rh 103 113748.7 ppb

Ho 165 258311 4 ppb

Kr 83 88 ppb

Method 6020 & 200.8 Metals Summary Report

Sample ID: QC Std 3

Sample Da Friday, November 04, 2005 14:48:49

Sample Description:

Concentration Results

Analyte Mass Meas. Inter Conc. Meal Report Unit

Li6 27563.7 ppb

Sc 45 44643.8 ppb

Cr 52 306806.1

47856.2

189.4978 ppb

I>

Cr

Rh

53

103

200.0987 ppb

111147.1 PPb

Ho 165 260837.4 ppb

Kr 83 95 ppb

Method 6020 & 200.8 Metals Summary Report

Sample ID: QC Std 4

Sample Da Friday, November 04, 2005 14:50:19

Sample Description:

Concentration Results

Analyte Mass Meas. Inter Conc. Meat Report Unit

Li6 28230.1 ppb

Sc 45 34157.5 ppb

Cr 52 163039 96.55078 ppb

Cr 53 30997.5 112.0087 ppb

Rh 103 114892.6 ppb

Ho 165 266463.6 ppb

Kr 83 98 ppb

Method 6020 & 200.8 Metals Summary Report

Sample ID: QC Std 6

Sample Da Friday, November 04, 2005 14:51:50

Sample Description:

Concentration Results

Analyte Mass Meas. Inter Conc. Mew Report Unit

Li6 31508.3 ppb

I- Sc 45 44758.8 ppb I Cr 52 6934.8 1.81957 ppb

Cr 53 13288 22.83773 ppb

I

> Rh 103 123465.1 PPb

Ho 165 304233.1 ppb

Kr 83 125 ppb

Method 6020 & 200.8 Metals Summary Report

Sample ID: QC Std 7

Sample Da Friday, November 04, 2005 14:53:21

Sample Description:

Concentration Results

Analyte Mass Meas. Inter Conc. Meal Report Unit

Li

6 31326.3 ppb

Sc 45 44431.5 PPb

Cr 52 24409.5 11.41696 ppb

1 Cr 53 16508.8 35.94813 ppb I> Rh 103 125454.4 ppb

Ho 165 308958.8 ppb

Kr 83 125.7 ppb

elementOne

e 6146 2 on
Method 6020 & 200.8 Metals Summary Report

Sample ID: QC Std 8

Sample Da Friday, November 04, 2005 14:54:52

Sample Description:

Concentration Results

Analyte Mass Meas. Inter Conc. Meat Report. Unit

Li

6 34573.7 ppb

Sc 45 44128.8 ppb

Cr 52 4502.4 0.09202 ppb

I Cr 53 10717.8 4.65919 ppb

I> Rh 103 144001.1 ppb. Ho 165 329263.3 ppb

Kr 83 90/ PPb

165 275110.8

Kr 83 79.7

Method 6020 & 200.8 Metals Summary Report

Sample ID: 6146-1

Sample. Da Friday, November 04, 2005 14:59:27

Sample De AMS

Concentration Results

Analyte Mass Meas. Inter Conc. Meat Report Unit

Li 6 22379.5 ppb

Sc 45 32478.3 ppb

Cr 52 11734.3 8.46891 ppb

Cr 53 7090.9 14.22488 ppb

Rh 103 77291.9 ppb

Ho 165 178147.5 ppb

Kr 83 79.7 ppb

Method 6020 & 200.8 Metals Summary Report

Sample ID: 6146-2

Sample Da Friday, November 04, 2005 15:00:56

Sample De AMS

Concentration Results

Method 6020 & 200.8 Metals Summary Report

Sample ID: QC SW 9

Sample Da Friday, November 04, 2005 14:56:24

Sample Description:

Concentration Results

Analyte Mass

Li

Sc

Cr

Cr

Rh

Ho

Kr

Method 6020 & 200.8 Metals Summary Report

Sample ID: QC Std 10

Sample Da Friday, November 04, 2005 14:57:56

Sample Description:

Concentration Results

Analyte Mass Meas. Inter Conc. Meat Report Unit

Li 6 29625.3 ppb

Sc

Cr

Cr

Rh

Ho

Meas. Inter Conc. Meat Report Unit

6 29106.9 ppb

45 40189.8 ppb

52 3794.4 0.16222 ppb

53 9049.9 6.018 ppb

103 117682.8 ppb.

165 275354.7 ppb

83 88.3 PPb

45 36101.9 ppb

52 3818.1 0.14497 ppb

53 8549.7 3.19113 ppb

103 119156.1 ppb

ppb

PPb

Analyte Mass Meas. inter Conc. Meat Report Unit

Li

6 21520.4 ppb

Sc 45 29213.9 ppb

Cr 52 36349.8 32.41788 ppb

I Cr 53 8651.5 28.71008 ppb

I> Rh 103 73184 ppb

Ho 165 163494.7 ppb

Kr 83 70/ ppb

elementOne e 6146 3 of 7
Method 6020 & 200.8 Metals Summary Report

Sample ID: 6146-3

Sample Da Friday, November 04, 2005 15:02:25

Sample De. AMS

Concentration Results

Analyte Mass Meas. inter Conc. Meal Report Unit

Li

6 20277.4 ppb

F Sc 45 24928.7 ppb

Cr 52 9827 3 7.76196 ppb

1 Cr 53 4887.6 2.51019 ppb

Rh 103 69397.4 ppb

Ho 165 155655.6 ppb

Kr 83 853 ppb

Method 6020 & 200.8 Metals Summary Report

Sample ID: 6146-3

Sample Da Friday, November 04, 2005 15:03:55

Sample De AMS

Concentration Results

Analyte Mass. Meas. Inter Conc. Meai Report Unit

Li

6 22828.9 ppb

Sc 45 26484.4 ppb

Cr 52 10472.6 7.24784 ppb

I>

Cr

Rh

53

103

4522.7

779911

-4.44503 ppb

ppb

Ho 165 172898.6 ppb

Kr 83 82 ppb

Method 6020 & 200.8 Metals Summary Report

Sample ID: 6146-5

Sample Da Friday, November 04, 200515:05:24

Sample De. AMS

Concentration Results

Analyte Mass Meas. Inter Conc. Meai Report Unit

1- Sc

6

45

18242.6

24540.3

ppb

ppb

Cr 52 27354 28.98315 ppb

Cr 53 6290 20.16739 ppb

Rh 103 61164.5 ppb

Ho 165 136874 8 ppb

Kr 83 70/ ppb

Method 6020 & 200.8 Metals Summary Report

Sample ID: 6146-5

Sample Da Friday, November 04, 2005 15:06:54

Sample De. AMS

Concentration Results

Analyte Mass

Li

Sc

Cr

I Cr

I> Rh

Kr 83 70

Meas. Inter Conc. Meal Report Unit .

6 20643.1 ppb

45 26145.1 ppb

52 81944.2 79.22427 ppb

53 12731.6 6360044 ppb

103 69990.7 ppb

165 154658.8 ppb

ppb

Method 6020 & 200.8 Metals Summary Report

Sample ID: 6146-7

Sample Da Friday, November 04, 2005 15:0824

Sample De AMS

Concentration Results

Analyte Mass Meas. Inter Conc. Meat

Li6 19843.2

Sc 45 26509.1

Cr 52 9901.7 8.31879

Cr 53 3563.3 -6.72137

Rh 103 66126.7

Ho 165 146102.6

Kr 83 91.7

Report Unit

ppb

ppb

ppb

ppb

Ppb

ppb

ppb

elementOne

e 6146 4 of 7
Report Unit

PPb

ppb

ppb

ppb

ppb

ppb

ppb

Method 6020 & 200.8 Metals Summary Report

Sample ID: 6146-7

Sample Da Friday, November 04, 2005 15:09:54

Sample De. AMS

Concentration Results

Analyte Mass Meas. Inter Conc. Meal Report Unit

Li 6 20130.4 ppb

Sc 45 24048.6 ppb

Cr 52 59742.8 59.46061 ppb

Cr 53 9726.5 42.95248 ppb

I> Rh 103 67405.5 ppb

Ho 165 149189.4 ppb

Kr 83 69.3 ppb

Method 6020 & 200.8 Metals Summary Report

Sample ID: 6146-9

Sample Da Friday, November 04, 2005 15:11:25

Sample De AMS

Concentration Results

Analyte Mass Meas. Inter Conc. Meai Report Unit

Li

6 20533.6 ppb

I- Sc 45 23764.1 ppb

Cr 52 19367.9 17.47643 ppb

Cr 53 4625.5 0.6114 ppb

I> Rh 103 68793 ppb

Ho 165 152371.4 ppb

Kr 83 77.7 ppb

Method 6020 & 200.8 Metals Summary Report

Sample ID: 6146-9

Sample Da Friday, November 04, 200515:12:56

Sample De MIS

Concentration Results

Analyte Mass Meas. Inter Conc. Meal Report Unit

Li

6 20571.5 ppb I- Sc 45 24327.9 ppb

Cr 52 20032.3 18.01473 ppb

Cr 53 4469 -0.81704 PPb

Rh 103 69309 5 PPb

Ho 165 153626 ppb

Kr 83 75.3 ppb

Method 6020 & 200.8 Metals Summary Report

Sample ID: QC Std 1

Sample Da Friday, November 04, 2005 15:14:26

Sample Description:

Concentration Results

Analyte Mass Meas. Inter Conc. Meal

Li

6 28238.4

Sc 45 25515.9

I Cr 52 2992.1 -0.07892

Cr 53 3819.8 -16.07111

I

> Rh 103 103798.8

Ho 165 222167

Kr 83 112.3

Method 6020 & 200.8 Metals Summary Report

Sample ID: QC Std 4

Sample Da Friday, November 04, 2005 15:15:56

Sample Description:

Concentration Results

Analyte Mass Meas. Inter Conc. Meal Report Unit

Li

6 29037.2 PPb

Sc 45 32928.1 ppb

Cr 52 158501.8 96.15253 ppb

Cr 53 23798.7 80.2939 ppb

I> Rh 103 112004 PPb

Ho 165 257740.8 ppb

Kr 83 121.7 ppb

elementOne

e 6146 5 of 7
Method 6020 & 200.8 Metals Summary Report

Sample ID: 6146-11

Sample Da Friday, November 04, 2005 15:17:28

Sample De AMS

Concentration Results

Analyte Mass Meas. Inter Conc. Meal Report Unit

Li

6 19200.3 ppb

I- Sc 45 25320.8 ppb I Cr 52 5692 3.8064 ppb I Cr 53 3502.3 -7.43617 ppb

I> Rh 103 67262 1 ppb

Ho 165 144478.7 ppb

Kr 83 120.7 ppb

Method 6020 & 200.8 Metals Summary Report

Sample ID: QC Std 1

Sample Da Friday, November 04, 2005 15:18:58

Sample Description:

Concentration Results

Analyte Mass Meas. Inter Conc. Meal Report Unit

Li

6 29304.9 ppb

I- Sc 45 25858.4 ppb I Cr 52 2704.1 -0.23432 ppb I Cr 53 3510 -17.3586 ppb

I> Rh 103 101746 ppb

Ho 165 214777.2 ppb

Kr 83 111 ppb

Method 6020 & 200.8 Metals Summary Report

Sample ID: QC Std 4

Sample Da Friday, November 04, 2005 15:20:28

Sample Description:

Concentration Results

Analyte Mass Meas. Inter Conc. Meal Report Unit

Li

6 31001 ppb

F Sc 45 34131 ppb I Cr 52 160059.5 93.85979 ppb I Cr 53 23868.8 76.77422 ppb

I> Rh 103 115861.9 ppb

Ho 165 257140.3 ppb

Kr 83 133.7 ppb

Method 6020 & 200.8 Metals Summary Report

Sample ID: LRB

Sample Da Friday, November 04, 2005 15:50:07

Sample Description:

Concentration Results

Analyte Mass Meas. Inter Conc. Meal Report Unit

Li

6 25606.1 ppb

I- Sc 45 72323.7 ppb I Cr 52 3663.4 0.30315 ppb I Cr 53 8014 4.95059 ppb

I> Rh 103 106991.6 ppb

Ho 165 242861.4 ppb

Kr 83 89.3 ppb

Method 6020 & 200.8 Metals Summary Report

Sample ID: LRB

Sample Da Friday, November 04, 2005 15:51:38

Sample Description:

Concentration Results

Analyte Mass Meas. Inter Conc. Meal Report Unit

Li

6 26487.9 ppb

I- Sc 45 53486.6 ppb I Cr 52 79389 48.48675 ppb I Cr 53 15628.7 42.41477 ppb I> Rh 103 109033.1 ppb

Ho 165 248437 ppb

Kr 83 95.3 ppb

elementOne

e 6146 6of7
Modod 6020 & 200.8 Metals Summary Report

Salale ID: QC. Std 1

Sant•le Da Friday, November 04, 2005 15:53:07

Sample Description:

Conantration Results

Analyte Mass Meas. Inter Conc. Meat Report Unit

Li 6 27627.7 ppb

I- Sc 45 40804.3 ppb

I Cr 52 3548.3 0 05914 ppb

I Cr 53 7918.6 1.46029 ppb

I> Rh 103 .115263 ppb

Ho 165 264751.8 ppb

Kr 83 97.7 ppb

Mettod 6020 & 200.8 Metals Summary Report

Sanile ID: QC Std 4

Sa nile Da Friday, November 04, 2005 15:54:37

Sa gle Description:

Concentration Results

Analyte Mass Meas. Inter Conc. Meal Report Unit

Li 6 27630 ppb

I- Sc 45 43356.2 ppb

I Cr 52 163301 96.25426 ppb

I Cr 53 28297 4 98.45886 ppb

I> Rh 103 115324.4 ppb

Ho 165 271295 ppb

Kr 83 97.7 ppb

elementOne

e 6146 7of 7
Appendix B

Field Data
TEMPERATURE

SENSOR STACK WALL

PROBE

 PITOT TUBE

s*"

sly s

ifitfriardbe • II REVERSE • TYPE

PITOT TUBE

Ve.,,,...STACK WALL

THERMOMETER

(7) CHECK VALVE

MANOMETER

ORIFICE 7 MAIN VALVE

AIN.UMiTIWO

PROSE

MI a OD a MN! St a Ile So •

!a gm ..... am. mi.

VACUUM LINE

VACUUM GAUGE

PITOT MANOMETER

10 • v I I: • 0 ,:: it

THERMOMETERS

ORIFICE 0

—IMES 

is

1 .: 1 • • 1::• 0:. .0 1

„: 0

:it; 'at

ICE BATH IMPINGES'S

ST • PASS VALVE

Impinger Contents:

1st & 2nd -.100 mis .1N NaOH

3rd Empty •

4th - 150 g silica gel

wilf TEST METER

SCHEMATIC OF EPA METHOD 3Q6 CHROMIUM SAMPLING TRAIN

ALL COMPONENTS GLASS OR TEFLON BEFORE THE EXIT THERMOMETER
&RAW mOR12011TAL t1UE T IIROUDIt DIAMETERS

II meta. Men • •nd .2 •I•nt 000000 Lag U dtics

dui. is lest lints 2C• us. • a• o' p•n".

DISTANCE

FROM OUT SIDE

OF PORT

24

re C

ii

.!--., Air

lifonitoming.

Specialist:J.1w- .

alacrity rotate Teal

Sampling and Velocity Traverse Point Determination

EPA Method 1'

CLIENT

PLANT NAME

CITY, STATE 

SAMPLING LOCATION

a

MI/P07 Servege--...91-12)

NO. OF PORTS. AVAILABLE 2-

NO. OF PORTS USED

PORT INSIDE DIAMETER 31'

DISTANCE FROM FAR WALL TO OUTSIDE OF PORT

NIPPLE LENGTH ANO/OR WALL THICKNESS

DEPTH OF STACK OR DUCT

STACK OR DUCT WIDTH (IF REcT4103924111

EOUI yALENT DIAMETER;

DF- PTH r WIDTH

-D .- DEPTH . WIDTH

DISTANCE •

FROM PORTS TO

FLOW DISTURBANCES

DIAMETERS

STACK/DUCT AREA. 

•

Locidica 447nm:cm Paids inCircalar St. arks cE Dols

votes of stock &mutt fions iilidevialitairleritta0p0O4

2 I J.I ).

/ 

UPSTREAM DOWNSTREAM

3.6 Ir.

INS

12

VELOCITY PARTICutATE.

DIAMETERS

UP OOMPH

e 2 0

12;

1.s

12s FA at/P:

- 1 24 or 25

PIVOT USED (I) TYPE STANDARD

X OF DISTANCE

DUCT' FROM

POINT Denis WAIL • 

peat 2 4 6 It 10 14 .16 It

14.6 6.7 4.4 3.2 2.6 Y1 3.1.1,6 24

2 254 no 146 6.2 Si 43 4.4

75.0 29.6 192 14.6 93 14 73

93.3, 704 323 216 17.7 4.6 123 109

5- 13.4 67.7 34.2 1 169 14.6

95.6 104 652 ..9.220 in

7 193 77.4 64.4 6 223 236

96.2 53.4 4 373 29.6

1 66.5 322

10 924 A2 9 711 619

13.4 720 704

901 Al 76.4

943 113 171

96.2 913 15.4, 15_ 95.1 13.1

91.4 925

17- 916

Is_._ 96.6

20-

20_ •

20 n 24

13 11 1/

39 13 3.2

6.7 6.0 33

9.7 27 73

129 17.6 10.3

163 14.6 132

20.4 110'.161

210 211 DA

30.6 262 210

36.1 313 27.2

61.2 393 313

WA 60.7 392

710 613 601

79.6 733 67.7

MS 722 72.1

17.1 no 77.0

903 1,4 WA

933 . IAA 139

96.1 91.3 KS

927 94.0 09.3

963 91.1

929 943

963

593

9 82

to

12

13

14 

15

16

20-7/

2/ 719 223fy

11 57g 

(7 V2."

17. •

Location of Traverse Points in Rectangular Stab or Doris

ipdt 2 3 4 • 6 7 '9: 10 11 . 12 18

•

1 - 230

7-- 710

3 •

6-

163

50.0

213

129

37.3

T73

10.0

3110 75.0

500 417

100 511.3

930. 73.0

91.7

7.1 63 5.6 10 4.5 4.2

21.4 119 /67 15.0 13.6 123

317. 31.3. 27.1 750 227 203

50.0 43.3.- 329 33.0 312 292

64.3 56.3 500 430 449 373 • 726 6113 611 550 3053 452

WA 123 na 63a Na ma

934 25.3 739 622 'CU

94.4 WA na

910 WA 792

953 113

21

23

911
97209

Co .c>

N 2

. 7

CO2

Comicnacrs

Vt. : Silica gel

Total IS 0

onitoring.

peciglists, Inc.!

Quality Source Testing FIELD DATA

Plant Rik. On N.% 

Data \Ss I iii, 

Sampling Location aiLCe b 5r eo&N"te 

Run Number ikiki`) M--boar 

Sample Type

Operator 

Barometric Pressure ) 

Static Pressure (PI ) ; "kip 

Filter Num ber(s) r3/ A

Pretest Leak Rate al .000 cfm fig 

Pretest Pilot Leak Check tt 

Pretest Orsat Leak Check ra k Schematic of

Read and Record all Data Every ej Minutes Traverse Point Layout

i/S• 44/2-

01111•

Pala!

Number

D

o

t

0

co'

•

astatral s araMtallm

Mal MIMS IMEMINPICitatTRIN eranuovlsrammtinnants . SEMI

Tata

10 ; D1 49.9 Al 4

IrEgnICCINFVONWM

SIMPIIIIIMI PFIM LST1111110M ISM

ataiiirintala IMIENFaIIINNOMI gilIMMalEitt11101101flIEWIIMINIIIRIVI

NOIMMIIIMMItnit

NMI

Via NOMIIIIMMISalINIMPIpallIMIN lair Calla =mini twesumnitstrasan 10015 MIMI= al

111.11=1111

Oaly,

ROOM IPPS1111101MIlla EtiMal PICIM111111011111PIRTS llrill111111121111111

11/444 Ps)

la II

tCa. • C1C10111 1

(Oki) fa. H 0

elm @ _4_ In. fig

hit A

GU Wier Tem

•

•

i a

Probe Length and Type 1 '

GA N SS 

Pilot Tuba La No. .—.±1.--13e

NOzzlo 1 D • %'s1

Ass umed Moisture, % ...SY,'

Meter Box Number Attic:7-S 

?detain II@ 1. CI 

Meter Gamma •IS'Sk

Referenced p K ul aTA 

Poet Teti Leak Rate n , re‘r+o-,

Post Test Pilot Leak Check

Poet Test Orsat Leek Check ,

norcencartnanma

NEES

Man

I I1111nMICIII

MIMI! eta ran
onitoring Ipeclalists , Quality Source resting FIELD DATA Conde outs

02

f

CO;.

VL : Silica gel CO Plant' ikiktps.INA\%.1 Ni Total I& 0

Date ‘011.611,6

Sampling Location Mot S CP‘z+ kaktser Probe Length oners/pc 0,-1 sass

Sample Type M - 3n Cv Pilot Tube 1.D. No.

Run Number P.RtNIm- e)111.01 ". Nozzle 1.D. • 4,e5

Operator C'3C- Assumed Moisture, %

Barometric Pressure (8 ) Meter Box Number

Static Pressure (11 )

— 1.."b Metet4 Ha 1'.R s9

Filter Num ber(s) tat 04 Meter Gamma n ?fl.

Pretest Leak Rate is .00 o cfm 6 i C In. Ng Retemneca p -; 4,0

Pretest not Leak Cheek 3 Poet Test Leak Ram s• elm CP In. lig

Pretest °rut Leak Clock Ni Schematic of Posi Test Pilot Leak Check

Read and Record all Data Every cs Minutes ta ts Traverse Point Layout Post Test Oral Leak Check

Ii

11C14

Nita

Number

ump

Vacuum

To, II tarmalial IFNETWMI11117111 MIMS

allIkr1111 8. A n 11111111111111

MIME mocrimmurremaiss

11flIllfl111MINIIIIFIIIIIIM511111111a11111

MICSIIIINIIIM11111111MIIMI1111

lea

Warill3M1111 IFM11111flatIlli SWIM

mum PME1111111211111PMINIM2111 a MINIM

IMIllnt0111111CTI. II •

MUNI WEIS

EILTIMICCCIIIICtallill111111111

Ir1111111101101153111111Mal

MIPIIIIIIMIT11111001111r11. 1117.1111M11.111111111111111

IMPC711111111111MININIECIIMICILTIM111.1

Ma1111111111PCMCIMIllrall 11111111S . .......n1=1111111111 •

Temp./ Filler

Temp.. F

Cm Gm Meier Tem

• •

11111r11110M11111119011111111fl SSW

111111111111/11111111E111111 0

Mir

&Orb. rbM
11,0 % 1 • 1

c41

nitorIng

ect• peciclists Inc. 1

ADP Quality Source Testing

Plant Mk 0 

Date 10 

Sampling Locution mascp cle-kALef 

Sample PIN Cc\- -5 nu, 

Run Number taCkn J to b to I 

Operator c,. c: 

Barometric Pressure ($ )

Stade Pressure (P, )' •):1 

' Filler Number(a) 1g14, 

Pretest Leak Rate ol .000 dm , 1D _ ,In. fig

Pretest Pltot Leak Check 3 

Pretest Oast Leak Check rgl A 

Read and Record all Data Every Minutes

Jot gild nn. sampans (2,,,,k /ba c . USt MOW VIICCly VI Wi4 me. UllIC7C01111 014Ca ri Lila

maywin

Polat no*, • (24•bout Buono; !lead.( P•) (eil)ia.H 0 Imp. • F romp./ Flan• Tampa

Number cola. clock) Us it 3 la. it t Ca Mon Temp.• F • F

Lily liej mom to • --r c VIM CI

la

t / IIMIPMIIIIIMIIIIMP111PMIXIIMIN / : 111112W4111

o 11011111IMTIMICIMIIICOIN . I ma SIN

IPMfl11111111M11111.0111 fling, al vitnucvnmannstama as al

IWIIIIII

111111a11111C111

flail

IIMME11111111M1111111LflIMMINICCIIIIIIMINIMIIIIIIININI

 PiCIMIIIIIIMIIII e. Illrl. Nal age! 1•11111.1

INNMati. • IIIIMIIIMIllallrlinIMM11111011. II ya..2

It MIMS MIMI • ..• • / 11111

11111111MIIIIMIMIMICP111 lialleePSIIIIIMII /

MIMI 0110M11110100111201111M1111

1111nINISSII

11111111111

MS

.b

MEW

al

la

a

sr.k MM. WIMIIIIMPSEHICTIIIIIIa MIS

PWIMIIIIINCIIIIIIIinlIMMIIP11111110Thl

Mi MIWAII.1111170111110011111ritantIMI wargeriprin Pt= simmenuan a tessioniustrami iamwria= ==ninj an

firon11111M11111111110111111r1. 111=1111111ftlaall

11110. 1MrleariMIlallril

SEMI

1 IIIIIIIIIIIIIIMIIIIIIIIIIIIPCVnllIllrIIIIIIrllaIIIIICCIIII

11111111r111112=111111111M1111111r4 IrIllr11111 IIIII

Mllarg

IMMIIIIIIIIIIMIIIIIIIIMIIIIPIM1113111111 . • 0 Minlail

Ill

Ma

ltilt .710101111111111101111111MCIIIIIILIMI la

fl' 1111arlitillIallIMMIIIIMMICLIIII 211111111121111111111=S1111=11. Illn ii

17

0 2

CO

02 FIELD DATA Ctaitiaikauts

Vu ; Silica gel

Total lIr 0

Schematic of

Traverse Point Layout

Probe Length and Typo

C-r1.ss,Ca)

Rites Tube: D No 3-01% 

lgozzle 1 D.

Asauraed Moisture Ve 

Meter Box Number —SAtic, 

Meter4 H@ ) ,An 

Meter Cazeraa %, 'Ilk 

References, p \C.% 1.3t .0 

Port TC41Lcak Rite • 'op(' tiro@

Post Test Pilot Leak Check

Post Test 0 rsat Leak Cheek ro I A

in Jig

'Limn
MOISTURE ANALYTICAL RESULTS

p lant Name Ri 121 . ThatIgne e 

City/State ..isigirde( /4 

Rua Number

Saapling Date

Analysis Date

Analyst

sampling Loc. fimpo rcragenn_

ROL-704 t-rvis 1 

/o-25-- or -7,111-c2C 10-,2S-- or 

Job No. ___gf /0, .L___ Srer

Bement A (..-C/14(7W )

sie - r

4'4. 2

se-7 ,

..".._-) —..‘

. 4, / i 4_ Zinal Weight, 9

Taxed Weight, g

Water Catch, g

6 s6

4

'/b.

3 42C4 ‘..2.5: o

- a j• 2, 2.--

Reagent. 2 ( 4 ,5e /144011)

Final Weight, g 495-7t. --709t

7ared Weight, g

Water Catch, g

‘7.5-,-6 ‘ ._z 4-7571

2142/ !"" 27,0

577 77, c?' S-72 6/ 0

Tteaclen t 3 ( 3

rr— )

Tina' Weight, g

Tared Weight, g

Water Catch, g ,..........

5-01.‘"7 S-DeP, 4?

4. I 3 , eg

COMERSED WATER, g 2 6 , I_ 7 7.0

Silica Cel

Final Weight, g 72 - Lt. i ‘R s

Tared Weight, g -7 0.2, 3 a,-7S St— Z.6.57-2,

ADSORBED WATER, g 11)R2Tt

II

41X , ( it ‘

TOTAL WATER COLLECTED, g 

Balance No. &J 

Typo ()) Triple Beam Electronic Reagent Box No. 

Balance located instable, draft • free area CJ)7 Yes CU "Ho", explain below.)

Corcenenta at, et-I5 2/1 Rop 3 pErr- / 2—

r&t...A 2. Pell-itiw-letC. 
MOISTURE ANALYTICAL RESULTS

Pla nt Name 6ie fe, Topwro,1 ler Job No.j_224-01--

Cit3/StateicanAckc_ea sampling Loc. /n4Peo s7„4,,,e1

PO-Toe -To- 3

- 

— 2-r-osfrib r 

Reagent A LC- /0) (214 )

Final Weight, g ficA r

Tared Weight, g

Water Catch, g

5--4S, 9--

• ---' 0 (1

Reagent 2 (X-44V4(/)

Final Weight, g ‘ha i

Tared Weight, g

Water Catch, g

6v7, 0

1.4 il

Reagent 3 (

4,Er_

Final Weight, g <011,3

Tared Weight, g

Water Catch, g

ro 7 2-

17 2 i

CONDENSED WATER, g 21, (

Silica Gel

g

g

gq, ( Final Weight, .__6

Tared Weight, b e7,r

ADSORBED WATER, g lA•e;

Balance No.kiti(^j_1 Type (/) Triple Beam - Electronic Reagent Box No. 

Balance located in stable, draft-free area MT Yes No (If "No", explain below.)

Comments

Avn Number

Suppling Date

Aialysie Date

Aealyet
Appendix C

Calibration Data
. .

AMS Ina

METER PRE-TEST CALIBRATION

•

Date: 17•Aug-05 

Meter Box Identillcatlor

Calibration Meter I. 1078914 Yds.: 1.0037 Barometric 30.03

AMS•5 Calibrators Initials; EWE . Approved Bt.

MDS 

33

:1:111

1711117111iir:1

„

11",•:

to nlirifli u

1

a::

CrililliMplThiirriliptgit

DIIIIBStROkii i : ti: ''' 01'

griffilM11:::r1 

"

,: :::Sp :IP-1

gig

P.W.11771171:illiffil

•

I. A ... 

Ithifiii

Filligiiii$11

. :: . .

ffilill

" i - ' " '

'111 'in

Stop 0.5 229,879 842.215 .82 00

Start 0,5 224.445 837.122 82 88 13 1.74464 1.04353 0,13452

Average: as 5.234 5.093 82 89

Stop 1.0 234,999 847.448 82 92

Start 1.0 229.679 842,215 82 90 9.5 1.80145 1.03480 0.13230

Avera ge: 1.0 5.320 5,233 82.0 91

Stop 1,5 240,099 852.49 82

7.6 1,83045 1.03206 0.13117 1.5 294,999 847.448 82 92

Average: 1.6 5.100 5,042 82 93 _

Step 2.0 245,183 857.631 82 98

6.5 1.84255 1.03149 0.13066 Start 2.0 240,099 852,49 82 94

Average: 2.0 5.064 5,041 82 99

Stop. 9.0 250.492 862.829 82 96

53 132024 1.02424. 0.13167 Start 3,0 245.183 857.531 82 .96

Average 30 5309 sass 82 96 

Stop 4,0 256.012 866.341 82 97

5 126272 1,02204 0.13041 Start 40 250.492 862829 82 98

Average; 4.0 5.520 5.512 82 963

Average: 1.81701 1.03135 0.13179

Kisco:

1577.560

Orlin* Setting 0.6 1.0 1.5 2.0 3.0 , 4.0

Y Div. 0.01217 0.00344 0.00070 3.00013 0.00712 0.00932

Delta H 0.07237 0.01556 0.01344 0.02555 0.00323 0.04671

Acceptable Y Dev. 0.02

Acceptable H Div. 0.2

Y Range .954.05
STACK TEMPERATURE SENSOR CALIBRATION DATA FORM

\\IW5 ( Thermocouple number PUN\S-• 

ir a

)rdoring

'peck' Ws, Inc.

F-Quatyscurcerestng

Date

Ambient temperature t31 or Barometric pressure _,30.Cr3 in Hg

Calibrator 0,k) Reference: mercury-in-glass /

oI.her

Reference.

point

number'

Reference Thermocouple

h thermometer potentiometer Tepper a ture

Source temperature, temperature,

(specify) "C I

difference c

134,1 i‘x°

e I

tho *-3

It\ 360

IX\ 1)b

aEvery 30°C (50°F) for each reference point.

Type of calibration system used.

[ ref tem., °C + 273 test thermom tem.,

ref temp, C + 273

+ 27311

100<1.5%.

Quality Assurance Handbook N2-2.10
ti

throne indicating levet position for

deleiminIng at and us.

throe indicating level goatee tor

determining p. and Ps.

Deipe• indicating levet petition ter

determinInge

Dr _z

Deem* indkallng Bevel p..ldon Ter

detemlnInta then calculate Z.

CALIBRATION DATA SHEET 2

Type S Mot Tuba Inspection

Damaged/

of 1-10• S a1 s +10E1

a (AO° 5 az s + 10°)

13 1 1-5° 5 al 5 +5°1

(-5• s az .5 + 5•)

0

I tte A tan r Is 0.1251

w — A tan 0 15 0.031251

Level and Perpendicular/

Obstruction/

0 

0 

Dt (3/16" 5 Di s 3/81

A

AnD, (1.05 5 PA/131 51.5)

37E'E'- -

en 

/. "Ls'

UA/OC Check

Completeness Legibility Accuracy- Specifications Reasonableness

rartIllcallon

salty that the Type S pilot tube/probe ID/ f..2 meets of exceeds all specifications,

anemia and/or applicable design features and Is hereby assigned a pilot tube calibration lector C of 0.84.

-.1.adct

Person 

e

el ISignatute/Datel

Certified by:

&Islam Lancaster East

Tank #

-45

/2 .20a

Page of 1717tv/t" 444-

;R&M

•74Ekli1llnin

Plating Tank Times
Paga_Zota Plating Tank Times
vision: Lancaster East

Cylinder

Ru Size

3

3

-±3

-113

43

rank #

(bb r it /2-12J0

/00/1

1 00" sarC 

/10 75

11.4110

4-3

Plating-rank Times
Plating Tank Times

vision:

ink #

a

. , .-.-,

1. ,4 .

Lancaster

n

East

/00

C Under

V

, 1)-

(141- / 3

raillniggvilnirMINCITIETnrigillin7rAirlan

7 ,

Date:

Time of da 

00

n

r: 1

A I

111117TUTTAII

g',/6.

I

k

.

; 8 54 0

Am • -hr

--• I

...

• II gi 1

tfri-?/ /0.5" 12), '72 // C‘c.

la pc'

- 3 /00 1i1/4)-p- FISC) 3 Iv 6 9: g' il St 0

SE 9c-2 7 it: sa< /00 ki• -PI 770 2ic

9: s.' a 5 //

o

. 5 /00 tiu -/37 9135

Page_Loti
Date:.

rrjIIIMIIrlTillIllrnrLillurnrirgntV;111F117r1RT411FTI

)1vIslon: Lancaster East

C Under

Tank # Comments

uP074><n7794

Plating Tank Times
Plating Tank Times

Ilvlsion: Lancaster East

C linda

Tank

/5 o7- 
Pressure 

lime Drop

t et> i '3.

IC :Ii5" 3 

/01 /5 L 3-2- egg-- 

Comments

Chromium Emission Compliance Test

Division: Lancaster East

Date: AbleiC 

Test Number: 7VInitials
Chromium Emission Compliance Test

Division: Lancaster East

Date: /0/2- s-sTest Number:

Pressure 

Time Drop

/Of

)I; (54)

3.2- 

3

3.L

3.7_ 

Comments Initials

06/t

cB 
Chromium Emission Compliance Test

Division: Lancaster East

ilas

Test Number

Pressure 

Time Drop Comments Initials

Date:

330

-z_ 

3. -2-

3: 2:-