alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Smith Barney Futures Management LLC
                         388 Greenwich Street, 7th Floor
                          New York, New York 10013-2396

June 11, 2001


John W. Henry & Company, Inc.
301 Yamato Road, Suite 2200
Boca Raton, Fl. 33431-4931

Attn: Mr. Ken Webster

         Re:      Management Agreement Renewals

Dear Mr. Webster:

We are  writing  with  respect  to your  management  agreements  concerning  the
commodity pools to which reference is made below (the "Management  Agreements").
We are extending the term of the Management Agreements through June 30, 2002 and
all other provisions of the Management Agreements will remain unchanged.

        Hutton Investors Futures Fund, L.P. II  (HIFF II)
        Shearson Lehman Select Advisors Futures Fund L.P.
        Shearson Mid-West Futures Fund
        Smith Barney Mid-West Futures Fund L.P. II
        JWH Strategic Allocation Master FD LLC
        The Saugatuck Fund L.P.

Please  acknowledge  receipt of this  modification  by signing  one copy of this
letter and returning it to the attention of Mr. Daniel  McAuliffe at the address
above or fax to  212-723-8985.  If you have any  questions  I can be  reached at
212-723-5435.

Very truly yours,

SMITH BARNEY FUTURES MANAGEMENT LLC

By:      /s/ Daniel R. McAuliffe, Jr.
         ----------------------------
         Daniel R. McAuliffe, Jr.
         Chief Financial Officer & Director

AGREED AND ACCEPTED
JOHN W. HENRY & COMPANY, INC.

By:


Print Name:

DRMcA/sr
**EXHIBIT 13.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

**PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS**

**ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Annual Report of Embotelladora Andina S.A (the “Company”) on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2014, as filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Miguel Ángel Peirano, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)                 The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)                 The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| /s/MIGUEL ÁNGEL PEIRANO |   |
|------------------------------|--------|
| Miguel Ángel Peirano    |   |
| Chief Executive Officer      |   |
| Embotelladora Andina S.A.    |   |
| Dated: April 30, 2015   |   |

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request

 

----
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-7294

JOHN R. BINNS, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus E. M. TUCKER, Virginia Parole Board Chairman;RON ANGELONE, Virginia Department of Corrections Director, Defendants - Appellees.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. James C. Cacheris, Senior District Judge. (CA-97-159-AM) Submitted: January 21, 1999 Decided: February 9, 1999 Before LUTTIG, MOTZ, and KING, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.John R. Binns, Appellant Pro Se. William W. Muse, Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).* Although the district court’s order is marked “filed” on July 31, 1998, the district court’s records show that it was entered on the docket sheet on August 3, 1998. Pursuant to Rules 58 and 79(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, it is the date that the order was entered on the docket sheet that we take as the effective date of the district court’s decision. Wilson v. Murray, 806 F.2d 1232, 1234-35 (4th Cir. 1986). 2 PER CURIAM: John R. Binns appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 1998) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Binns v. Tucker , No. CA-97-159-AM (E.D. Va. Aug. 3, 1998). * We dispense with oral argument because thefacts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Exhibit 10.36


                    GLOBAL TELECOMMUNICATION SOLUTIONS, INC.
                                 40 ELMONT ROAD
                             ELMONT, NEW YORK 11003



                                                              January 2, 1997



Mr. Eli Oxenhorn
56 Intervale
Roslyn Estates, New York  11576

Dear Mr. Oxenhorn:

                  This will confirm our agreement to extend your  Consulting and
Non- Competition  Agreement dated February 14, 1995 ("Agreement") for a two-year
period commencing on February 14, 1997.

                  The terms of your extended engagement shall be as set forth in
the Agreement,  except that the consideration for the extended  engagement shall
be the  issuance  to you of an option to  purchase  75,000  shares of the common
stock of the  Company on the terms and  conditions  set forth in a stock  option
agreement of even date herewith.

                  Please  confirm the extension of your  agreement by signing in
the space provided below.

                                                    Very truly yours,

                                                    GLOBAL TELECOMMUNICATION
                                                     SOLUTIONS, INC.



                                                By:  /s/ Shelly Finkel
                                                   --------------------------
                                                     SHELLY FINKEL
ACCEPTED AND AGREED TO:

/s/ Eli Oxenhorn
----------------------------
ELI OXENHORN




<PAGE>
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 169 (Thursday, August 30, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Page 44271]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-19021]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meeting

TIME AND DATE: September 4, 2018; 1:00 p.m.

PLACE: 800 N Capitol Street NW, Washington, DC.

STATUS: This meeting is closed to the public.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: 

Closed Session

1. Fact Finding No. 28: Conditions and Practices Relating to Detention, 
Demurrage, and Free Time in International Oceanborne Commerce

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Rachel Dickon, Secretary, (202) 
523-5725.

JoAnne D. O' Bryant,
Program Analyst.
[FR Doc. 2018-19021 Filed 8-28-18; 4:15 pm]
 BILLING CODE 6731-AA-P
<PAGE>

                                 EXHIBIT 21.1


                        SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT


<TABLE> 
<CAPTION> 

                                                                                               Percentage
                                                                                               of Voting
                                                                                               Securities
        Name                              Address                  Incorporation                  Owned  
        ----                              -------                  -------------               ----------
       <S>                                <C>                      <C>                         <C> 
                                                             
Speciality Constructors, Inc.             Cedar Crest, NM                NM                        100%
Speciality Management, Inc.               Cedar Crest, NM                NV                        100%                   
Speciality Coatings, Inc.                 Cedar Crest, NM                NV                        100%                   
Speciality Combined Resources, Inc.       Laguna Hills, CA               TX                        100%
Speciality Fortress, Inc.                 Cedar Crest, NM                NV                        100%                   
Speciality Training, Inc.                 Cedar Crest, NM                NV                        100%                   
Speciality Constructors East, Inc.        Cedar Crest, NM                NV                        100%                   
Microwave Tower Service, Inc.             Salem, Oregon                  OR                        100% 
Novak & Lackey Construction Co., Inc.     Oklahoma City, Oklahoma        OK                        100%
</TABLE>
#### In the Matter of Chris James, Appellant, v Glenn S. Goord, as Commissioner of the Department of Correctional Services, et al., Respondents.

[722 NYS2d 609]

Peters, J.

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court (Castellino, J.), entered December 21, 1999 in Chemung County, which, in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, granted respondents’ motion to dismiss the petition as time barred.

Following a tier III hearing, petitioner was found guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules. Upon petitioner’s receipt of the administrative affirmance of such determination on April 6, 1999, a CPLR article 78 proceeding was commenced. Respondents successfully moved to dismiss the proceeding on timeliness grounds, prompting this appeal.

Petitioner’s receipt of the administrative determination on April 6, 1999 rendered it final and binding *(see, Matter of Biondo v New York State Bd. of Parole,*60 NY2d 832, 834), thus triggering the four-month statutory period within which judicial review may be sought *(see,*CPLR 217 [1]; *Matter of Shell v McCray,*261 AD2d 664). From a disbursement form *826authorizing prison officials to deduct the cost of postage from petitioner’s account, we can discern that petitioner placed a verified petition and application for poor person status in the prison mail system on Wednesday, July 28, 1999, seven days before the expiration of the limitations period. Prison officials approved his request on August 2, 1999; the papers were received by the clerk of the court on August 5, 1999 and, after the expiration of the limitations period, an order to show cause was issued by Supreme Court. It was filed with the Chemung County Clerk on August 19, 1999.

Citing to *Matter of Mandala v Jablonsky*(242 AD2d 271), petitioner urges this Court to adopt a “mailbox rule” whereby proceedings by *pro se*prisoners would be deemed commenced, for Statute of Limitations purposes, when a verified CPLR article 78 petition is delivered to prison authorities or placed in the prison mail system for forwarding to the appropriate court *(see generally, Houston v Lack,*487 US 266). We find such reliance misplaced. While the prisoner in *Matter of Mandola v Jablonsky (supra)*submitted a proposed order to show cause along with his verified petition and other supporting papers in urging the adoption of such rule, no such proposed order to show cause or notice of petition was submitted by petitioner herein *(see,*CPLR 304). Moreover, we have declined to adopt a “mailbox rule” even when the verified petition, accompanied by an order to show cause, albeit unsigned, was placed in the prison mailing system prior to the expiration of the limitations period *(Matter of Grant v Senkowski,*270 AD2d 536), and the Court of Appeals has now affirmed our order *(Matter of Grant v Senkowski,*95 NY2d 605). With this issue having been finally determined by the Court of Appeals, we affirm the order of Supreme Court.

Cardona, P. J., Crew III, Mugglin and Lahtinen, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, without costs.
June 22, 1998



John W. Henry & Company
One Glendinning Place
Westport, Ct. 06880
Attn: Ms. Beth Kenton


         Re:      Management Agreement Renewal
                  Shearson Mid-West Futures Fund

Dear Ms. Kenton:

We are  writing  with  respect  to  your  management  agreement  concerning  the
commodity pool to which reference is made above (the "Management Agreement"). We
would like to extend the term of the Management  Agreement through June 30, 1999
and make the  attached  modification  on Rider 1. All  other  provisions  of the
Management Agreement will remain unchanged.

Please indicate your agreement to and acceptance of this modification by signing
one copy of this letter and returning it to the attention of Mr. Daniel Dantuono
at the address above or fax to 212-723-8985.  If you have any questions I can be
reached at 212-723-5416.

Very truly yours,

SMITH BARNEY FUTURES MANAGEMENT INC.



By:
         Daniel A. Dantuono
         Chief Financial Officer,
         Director & Treasurer

AGREED AND ACCEPTED

JOHN W. HENRY & COMPANY


By:

Print Name:

DAD/sr
Exhibit 32.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned hereby certifies that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2010 of Flurida Group, Inc. (the “Company”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in such Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated: August 15, 2011
By:
/s/ Yaping HeYaping HeChief Financial Officer





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Flurida Group, Inc. and will be retained by Flurida Group, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 60 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 60

To amend the National Trails System Act to provide for the study of the 
 Western States Trail for potential designation as a national historic 
                                 trail.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

             January 22 (legislative day, January 3), 2013

 Mrs. Boxer (for herself and Mrs. Feinstein) introduced the following 
bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and 
                           Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the National Trails System Act to provide for the study of the 
 Western States Trail for potential designation as a national historic 
                                 trail.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Western States National Historic 
Trail Study Act of 2013''.

SEC. 2. WESTERN STATES NATIONAL HISTORIC TRAIL STUDY.

    Section 5(c) of the National Trails System Act (16 U.S.C. 1244(c)) 
is amended by adding at the end the following:
            ``(46) Western states trail.--
                    ``(A) In general.--The Western States Trail, a 
                trail of approximately 100 miles from Squaw Valley to 
                Auburn, California (including the Tevis Cup Loop)--
                            ``(i) as displayed on the maps maintained 
                        in the office of the American River District 
                        Ranger, Tahoe National Forest;
                            ``(ii) as described in the journal of 
                        Professor William Brewer for August 30, 1863; 
                        and
                            ``(iii) along which are conducted--
                                    ``(I) the Western States Trail 
                                Ride; and
                                    ``(II) the Western States Endurance 
                                Run.
                    ``(B) Components.--The study under this paragraph 
                shall include a determination on whether the trail is 
                appropriate for designation as a national historic 
                trail.''.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS OF AEARO CORPORATION AS OF DECEMBER 31,
1998 (UNAUDITED) AND SEPTEMBER 30, 1998 AND THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS (UNAUDITED) FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED DECEMBER 31,
1998 AND 1997 CONTAINED IN AEARO CORPORATION'S FORM 10-Q FOR THE QUARTER ENDED
DECEMBER 31, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FORM
10-Q.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                           3,943
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   38,854
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     31,220
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                77,643
<PP&E>                                          87,193
<DEPRECIATION>                                  30,248
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 274,417
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           56,774
<BONDS>                                        212,212
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             1
<OTHER-SE>                                       1,897
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   274,417
<SALES>                                         69,113
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                69,113
<CGS>                                           38,584
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   38,584
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                24,709
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               6,324
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (504)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       394
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (898)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (898)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (30.22)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (30.22)
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>

                                                                   Exhibit 23-18

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the  incorporation by reference of our report dated March 7, 2006,
relating to the financial statements and financial statement schedule of The
Detroit Edison Company (which report expresses an unqualified opinion and
includes an explanatory paragraph relating to the change in the method of
accounting for asset retirement obligations in 2005 and 2003), appearing in the
Annual Report on Form 10-K of The Detroit Edison Company for the year ended
December 31, 2005, in the following registration statements:

         FORM                       REGISTRATION NUMBER

         Form S-3                   333-124159
         Form S-4                   333-123926

/S/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

Detroit, Michigan
March 7, 2006
#### EAGLE LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, INC., Appellant, v. Vickie RUSH, Personal Representative of the Estate of Kevin Rush, Deceased, Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, and Joe Pierce, Appellees.

No. 79390.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma.

May 26, 1992.

As Corrected May 29, 1992.

ORDER

On April 1, 1992, the thirtieth day after the filing of the final order, appellant placed its petition in error in the mail. The envelope containing the petition in error did not bear sufficient postage. The post office did not deliver the petition in error to the Clerk of this Court, but, instead, returned the envelope, on April 6, 1992, to the offices of appellant’s attorneys due to the insufficient postage. The petition in error was then hand-delivered to the Clerk of this Court on April 6, 1992 and was file stamped by the clerk on that date.

Appellees filed motions to dismiss this appeal, claiming that the petition in error was untimely filed. In response, appellant claims that the petition in error should be deemed filed when it was originally mailed on April 1, 1992.

12 O.S.1991 § 990A provides that a petition in error must be filed with the Clerk of this Court within thirty days from the date the final order or judgment is filed. Section 990A further provides that the filing of a petition in error may be accomplished by mail, and that the date of mailing, as shown by the postmark, shall constitute the date of filing.

Appellees’ motions to dismiss are granted and this appeal is dismissed because it was not commenced timely and, thus, failed to invoke this court’s jurisdiction. 12 O.S.1991 § 990A(A), (D). The date of the mailing of a petition in error shall constitute the date of filing of that petition in error *only*when it is mailed in accordance with the requirements set forth in 12 O.S.1991 § 990A, when it is properly addressed, when it contains sufficient postage, and when such other precautions are taken as are ordinarily observed to insure its safe transmission to this court. The Restatement of Contracts (Second) § 66; *Adams v. Lindsell,*106 Eng.Rep. 250 (K.B. *12251818); *McAlister v. Klein,*81 Okl. 291, 198 P. 506, 508 (Okl.1921); *Blake v. Hamburg-Bremen Fire Ins. Co.,*2 S.W. 368, 67 Tex. 160 (1886); *Bamebey v. Barron G. Collier, Inc.,*65 F.2d 864, 868 (8th Cir.1933); *Wagner v. McClay,*306 Ill. 560, 138 N.E. 164, 165 (1923), and *International Transport Association v. Des Moines Morris Plan Co.,*215 Iowa 268, 245 N.W. 244, 246 (1932).

Vote to Dismiss:

OPALA, C.J., and LAVENDER, SIMMS, HARGRAVE, ALMA WILSON and SUMMERS, JJ., concur.

HODGES, V-C.J., and KAUGER, J„ dissent.

Vote to Publish:

OPALA, C.J., HODGES, V.C.J., and LAVENDER, SIMMS, HARGRAVE, WILSON, KAUGER and SUMMERS, JJ., concur.