T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pa ne l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w i tho utoral ar gu m ent . S ee F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2).

T he H onor abl e R obe rtJ . T i m l i n, U ni t e d S t a t e s D i s tr i c tJudge f orthe ** * C e ntr a l D i s tr i c tof

C a l i f orni a , s i tt i ng byde s i gna t i on. NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T J ON NA SS ET , P e titio n e r- A p p e lla n t, v. BR I AN BE LL EQUE, R es po nd ent- A pp el l ee . N o. 09- 35005 D . C. N o . 1 : 0 6 - CV - 0 0 6 1 1 - CL ME MOR AN DU M *

A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt

f orthe D i s tr i c tof

O r e gon O w e n M . P a nne r , U ni t e d S t a t e s D i s tr i c tJudge , P r e s i di ng

S ubm i tt e d June 11, 2010 ** P ort l a nd, O r e gon B e f or e : T H O M P S O N a nd M c K E O W N , C i r c ui tJudge s , a nd T I M L I N , S e ni or D i stri ctJudg e. *** 

# FI LED JU L 07 2010 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALSI n b o th h is s up p le m e n ta l p e titio n f o rp o s t- c o n v ic tio n r e lie f b e f o r e th e s ta te 1 c o u rt, a n dh is p e titio n b e f o r e th e d is tr ic t c o u rt o f

O r e g o n , N a s s e t r a is e s h is A pp re nd i /B l akel y argum enti n a tw o-fol d fas hi on . T hati s, N as se tfi rs tal l eges an in d e p e n d e n t c la im u n d e rA p p r e n d i/B la k e ly , a r g u in g th a t h e is e n title dto p o s tconv i ct i on re l i ef

because the S t at e depri ved h i m of hi s c on st i tut i on alri gh tt o a tri al b y j u ry as g u aran t eedb y th e S i x th A m en d m en t . A n dseco n d , N assetassert s a s e p a r a te S ix th A m e n d m e n t c la im th a t h is tr ia l c o u n s e l w a s in e f f e c tiv e f o rf a ilin g to obj e c tt o the A ppr e ndi /B l a ke l yvi ol a t i on. W hi l e de ny i ng both c l a i m s on the m e r i t s , the di s tr i c tc ourtonl ygr a nt e d ac e rt i f i c a t e of appe a l abi l i tya s t o the in e f f e c tiv e a s s is ta n c e o f

c o u n s e l c la im ( in a d d itio n to ap r o c e du r a l d e f au lt is s u e ) . E R 6 3 . N a s s e t h a s n o t m o v e dto e x p a n dth e c e rtif ic a te o f ap p e a lab ilitya n do n ly f r a m e s the s i ngl e i s s ue i n hi s A ppe l l a nt ’ s O pe ni ng B r i e f a s one ba s e d on i ne f f e c t i ve a s s i s t a nc e of

c ouns e l . T he r e f

or e , w e tr e a tthe i ne f

f e c t i ve a s s i s t a nc e of c o u n s e l c la im a s th e o n lyc la im o n ap p e a l. 2 J o n N a s s e t, a n O r e g o n s ta te p r is o n e r , ap p e a ls th e d is tr ic t c o u rt’s d e n ia l o f h is 28 U . S . C . § 2254 habe a s c orpus pe t i t i on c ha l l e ngi ng hi s s e nt e nc e s on c ount s 4 a nd 8 o f tw e lv e c o u n ts o f

s e x u a l ab u s e o f

h is s te p - d au g h te ro f

w h ic h h e w a s c o n v ic te d . N a s s e t a r g u e s th a t h is tr ia l c o u n s e l r e n d e r e din e f f e c tiv e a s s is ta n c e b yf

a ilin g to obj e c ta tthe s e nt e nc i ng pr oc e e di ng t o the s e nt e nc e s i m pos e d on c ount s 4 a nd 8 of hi s c on vi ct i on s w hen tho se se nt ence s w er e bas ed on j ud i ci alfa ct -f i nd i ng un der a prepon derance of the evi dence s t andard, vi ol at i ng hi s r i gh tt o a tri alby j ury gu ar ant ee d b y the S i xth A m endm entt o the U ni t ed S t at es C on st i tut i on as i nt e rpr e t e d i n A ppr e ndi v. N e w J e r s e y , 530 U . S . 466 ( 2000) , a nd W a s hi ngt on v. B l a ke l y , 542 U . S . 296 ( 2004) . W e ha ve j ur i s di c t i on unde r28 U . S . C . § 1291 a nd § 1 2 2 5 3 a n da f

f i rm.3

A s a n in itia l m a tte r , th e S ta te a r g u e s th a t N a s s e t f a ile dto e x h au s t h is i ne f f e c t i ve a s s i s t a nc e c l a i m a nd tha ti ti s now pr oc e dur a l l yde f aul t e d. W e do not re ac h thi s i ss ue bu tre sol ve thi s c as e on the m er i t s of N as se t ’ s i neff ec t i ve as si st ance cl ai m . S ee 28 U . S . C . § 2 25 4(b)(2). A s not ed abov e, N as se tspec i fi ca l l y t akes i ss ue w i th the se nt ence s i m po se d on coun t s 4 and 8 of hi s tw el ve coun t s of c on vi ct i on s. T he tri alcourtfoun d at s e n te n c in g th a t e a c h o f

c o u n ts 4 a n d8 a lle g e dc o n du c t w h ic h w a s “as e p a r a te of f e ns e , s e pa r a t e ha rm , [ a nd] s e pa r a t e i nc i de nt ” f r om the c onduc ta l l e ge d i n the other c ou nt s i n the i nd i ctm ent . S uch fi nd i ng s of di sc re t e c ri m i nal epi sodes und er O re go n’ s s ent enci ng sc hem e di d n otal t erthe m axi m um st atut ory s ent ence N as se t f a c e d f ore i the rc ount . H ow e ve r , s uc h f i ndi ngs di d i nc r e a s e the pr e s um pt i ve se nt enci ng rang es for tho se coun t s t o 1 21 -130 m on ths (130 m on ths i m po se d) un der O r e gon’ s S e nt e nc i ng G ui de l i ne s . N a s s e t ’ s tr i a l c ouns e l di d notobj e c tt o the se nt ence s. In addi t i on , N as se t ’ s c on vi ct i on s bec am e f i nal af t erA pp re nd i w as de c i de d butbe f

or e B l a ke l yw a s i s s ue d. T h e s ta te p o s t- c o n v ic tio n r e lie f c o u rt’s d e n ia l o f

N a s s e t’s p e titio n f

o rp o s tc onvi c t i on r e l i e f

w a s not“ c ontr a ryt o, ora n unr e a s onabl e appl i c a t i on of ” the s t a nda r d f

ori ne f f e c t i ve a s s i s t a nc e c l a i m s e s t abl i s he d i n S tr i c kl a nd v. W a s hi ngt on, 46 6 U . S . 66 8 (19 84 ). 28 U . S . C . § 2 25 4(d)(1). N as se tcann otshow thathi s tri al4

co u n sel act edd efi ci en t l y b y fai l i n g t o o b j ectt o th e sen t en ces i m p o sedo n co u n t s 4 a n d8 p u r s u a n tt o th e ru l e a n n o u n c e di n B l a k e l yb e f o r e B l a k e l ywa s d e c i d e d . As w e r e c o g n iz e din S c h a r d t v . P a y n e 4 1 4 F .3 d1 0 2 5 ( 9 th C ir . 2 0 0 5 ) , e v e ryc ir c u it co u rt th at ad d re ss ed th e iss u e p rio r to B lak ely h eldth at se n ten ce s s u ch as N as se t’ s di d n otoffe nd A pp re nd i . Id. at10 35 (c ol l ec t i ng ci rc ui tca se s and concl ud i ng that

“ th e ru l e an n o u n cedi n B l ak el y w as cl earl y n o tap p aren tt o al l reaso n ab l e j u ri st s, norw a s i tdi c t a t e d bypr e c e de nt ” ) . A s s uc h, N a s s e ts i m pl yha s no vi abl e a r gum e nt tha thi s c ouns e l w a s de f i c i e nti n f

a i l i ng t o obj e c tt o the s e nt e nc e s i m pos e d on co u n ts 4 an d8 b ef

o re B lak ely w as d ec id ed . A s th e d istrict co u rt n o ted , N as se t’ s c o u n s e l d idn o t a c t u n r e a s o n ab lyin f a ilin g to p r e d ic t th e B la k e lyd e c is io n , a deci si on thatthi s c ou rthel d i n S char dtes t abl i shed a new rul e of c ri m i nal procedure thatcann otbe appl i ed re troac t i vel y on col l at er alre vi ew t o cas es thatbecam e f i nal be f or e B l a ke l yw a s de c i de d. AF F I RME D.