alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Finance and Accounting Service Providing payment services for the U.S. Department of Defense

Search
Search

Search

              - 
              - 
              - 
              - 
              - 

-  Military Member		 
-  Retired Military & Annuitant		 
-  Civilian Employee		 
-  Contractor & Vendor		 

HomefoiaFOIA Expedited Processing and Fees

## Freedom of Information Act (FOIA)

                          - Overview
                          - Information Required to Conduct a Search 
                          - Expedited Processing and Fees
                          - Submit a FOIA Request
                          - Frequently Asked Questions

## Privacy Act (PA)

                          - Overview
                          - Submit a Privacy Act Request 
                          - System of Records Notices (SORN)
                          - Privacy Impact Assessments (PIA)
                          - Frequently Asked Questions

## Other FOIA Information

                          - Subpoenas & Court Orders
                          - Request Records on behalf of an Individual other than Yourself
                          - State Agencies
                          - Public Liaison/Contact Us
                          - Reading Room

#### **EXPEDITED PROCESSING AND FEES**

**Title 32 Code of Federal Regulation (C.F.R.) Part 286.8****32 C.F.R. § 286.5(a)**.

##### **THERE ARE TWO ACCEPTED REASONS FOR THE EXPEDITED PROCESSING****OF A FOIA REQUEST:**

                        - COMPELLING NEED
                        - OTHER CIRCUMSTANCES

#####  

**FOIA FEES**

**search, review and duplication**
                        - Commercial
                        - Non-commercial scientific or educational institutions or news media
                        - All other requesters

**Read how fees are calculated****FEE WAIVERS****The inability to pay fees is not a legal basis for granting a waiver.**

Page Updated January 30, 2024

### Stay Connected

Department of Defense     Department of Veterans Affairs     Military Employment Verification     Warrior Care Website     Defense Contract Mgmt Agency  DoD Forms     Department of State     Civilian Personnel Mgmt Service     DTS Travel Center     System for Award Mgmt (SAM)    Congressional/LegislationPersonnel Force Innovation     Freedom of Information Act     DFAS Hotline   Contact Us     Accessibility / Section 508    EEO / No Fear Act  

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil
<page>				       EXHIBIT 32.01


CERTIFICATION OF PRESIDENT PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Annual Report of Morgan Stanley Spectrum
Technical L.P. (the ?Partnership?) on Form 10-K for the period
ended December 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the ?Report?), I, Walter Davis,
President of Demeter Management Corporation, the general partner
of the Partnership, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:
(1)	The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
(2)	The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Partnership.









By:	  /s/	Walter Davis

Name:		Walter Davis
Title:	President

Date:		March 27, 2008
Exhibit 32 

Certification of CEO and CFO Pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

as Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of TPG Specialty Lending, Inc. (the “Company”) for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2017, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), Joshua Easterly and Michael Fishman, as Co-Chief Executive Officers of the Company, and Ian Simmonds, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to such officer’s knowledge: 

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

 

| /s/ Joshua Easterly |
|---------------------|
| Name:               |   | Joshua Easterly |
| Title:              |   | Co-Chief Executive Officer |
| Date:               |   | May 3, 2017 |

 

| /s/ Michael Fishman |
|---------------------|
| Name:               |   | Michael Fishman |
| Title:              |   | Co-Chief Executive Officer |
| Date:               |   | May 3, 2017 |

 

| /s/ Ian Simmonds |
|------------------|
| Name:            |   | Ian Simmonds |
| Title:           |   | Chief Financial Officer |
| Date:            |   | May 3, 2017 |

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 173 (Thursday, September 6, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Page 45229]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-19266]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. ER18-2246-000]


Supplemental Notice That Initial Market-Based Rate Filing 
Includes Request for Blanket Section 204 Authorization: Heartland 
Divide Wind Project, LLC

    This is a supplemental notice in the above-referenced proceeding of 
Heartland Divide Wind Project, LLC's application for market-based rate 
authority, with an accompanying rate tariff, noting that such 
application includes a request for blanket authorization, under 18 CFR 
part 34, of future issuances of securities and assumptions of 
liability.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest should file with the 
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE, Washington, 
DC 20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's 
Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). Anyone 
filing a motion to intervene or protest must serve a copy of that 
document on the Applicant.
    Notice is hereby given that the deadline for filing protests with 
regard to the applicant's request for blanket authorization, under 18 
CFR part 34, of future issuances of securities and assumptions of 
liability, is September 19, 2018.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and 
interventions in lieu of paper, using the FERC Online links at http://www.ferc.gov. To facilitate electronic service, persons with internet 
access who will eFile a document and/or be listed as a contact for an 
intervenor must create and validate an eRegistration account using the 
eRegistration link. Select the eFiling link to log on and submit the 
intervention or protests.
    Persons unable to file electronically should submit an original and 
5 copies of the intervention or protest to the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE, Washington, DC 20426.
    The filings in the above-referenced proceeding are accessible in 
the Commission's eLibrary system by clicking on the appropriate link in 
the above list. They are also available for electronic review in the 
Commission's Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an 
eSubscription link on the website that enables subscribers to receive 
email notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). 
For assistance with any FERC Online service, please email 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#55131007161a3b393c3b30062025253a272115333027367b323a23"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="31777463727e5f5d585f54624441415e434571575443521f565e47">[email protected]</span></a> or call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For TTY, 
call (202) 502-8659.

    Dated: August 30, 2018.
Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2018-19266 Filed 9-5-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
----

|   | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company. |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:  June 29, 2011 |   | By:    |   /s/ Evgeniy Ler        |
|--------------------------------|--------|--------|-------------------------------|
|                           |   |   | Evgeniy Ler                   |
|                           |   |   | Chief Financial Officer       |
|                           |   |   | (Principal Financial Officer) |

----
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TENNESSEE

AT KNOXVILLE

January 7, 2003 Session

STATE OF TENNESSEE v. JERRY BAXTER GRAVES

Appeal by Permission from the Court of Criminal Appeals

Criminal Court for Knox County

No. 69593 Richard R. Baumgartner, Judge

No. E2001-00123-SC-R11-CD - Filed May 27, 2003

Janice M. Holder, J., concurring.

I agree that the judgment of the Court of Criminal Appeals should be affirmed. I write separately

because I disagree with the majority’s conclusion that the trial court did not err in failing to grant the

defendant’s pre-trial Rule 5.1(a) motion to dismiss the indictment and remand for a new preliminary

hearing when a recording of the defendant’s preliminary hearing was not preserved. I would hold that in

all cases in which the failure to record a preliminary hearing is brought to the attention of the trial court

prior to trial, the appropriate remedy is to dismiss the indictment and remand for a new preliminary

hearing that is properly recorded. To so require will promote judicial economy and obviate subsequent

review to determine if the failure to comply with Rule 5.1(a) constituted error.

In the present case, I would apply the non-constitutional harmless error standard to determine

whether the trial court’s failure to dismiss the indictment and remand for a new preliminary hearing merits

reversal, as there is no constitutional right to have one’s preliminary hearing recorded. Under this

standard, reversal is not warranted unless the error complained of more probably than not affected the

judgment to the defendant’s prejudice. See Tenn. R. Crim. P. 52(a) (stating that “[n]o judgment of

conviction shall be reversed on appeal except for errors which affirmatively appear to have affected the

result of the trial on the merits”); see also State v. Bowers, 77 S.W.3d 776, 791 (Tenn. Crim. App.

2001) (applying non-constitutional harmless error analysis to the trial court’s violation of Rule 30 of the

Tennessee Rules of Criminal Procedure).

The defendant argues that because Richards’ testimony at trial was different from his testimony at

the preliminary hearing, the lack of a recording hampered his ability to impeach Richards at trial.

However, defense counsel, who was present at the preliminary hearing, illustrated discrepancies in

Richards’ testimony at trial without the benefit of a recording of the preliminary hearing. Therefore, no

prejudice to the defendant was shown. Moreover, remanding the case for a new preliminary hearing

would not assure the defense that the same discrepancies would occur in Richards’ testimony. Thus,

because the failure to properly record the preliminary hearing did not more probably than not affect the

judgment to the defendant’s prejudice, I would hold that reversal in this case is not warranted.

Page 1
In summary, I disagree with the majority’s conclusion that the trial court did not err in failing to

grant the defendant’s pre-trial Rule 5.1(a) motion to dismiss the indictment and remand for a new

preliminary hearing. However, I would hold that the error in this case was harmless.

____________________________

JANICE M. HOLDER, JUSTICE

Page 2
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Veritas DGC Inc. (the
"Company") for the year ended July 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Form 10-K"), I, Matthew D.
Fitzgerald, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.       The Form 10-K fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;

2.       The information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.

October 14, 2003


/s/ MATTHEW D. FITZGERALD
-------------------------
Matthew D. Fitzgerald
Chief Financial Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Veritas DGC Inc. and will be retained by Veritas DGC Inc. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

                                       56
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 173 (Thursday, September 6, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Page 45239]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-19292]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Formations of, Acquisitions by, and Mergers of Bank Holding 
Companies

    The companies listed in this notice have applied to the Board for 
approval, pursuant to the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 (12 U.S.C. 
1841 et seq.) (BHC Act), Regulation Y (12 CFR part 225), and all other 
applicable statutes and regulations to become a bank holding company 
and/or to acquire the assets or the ownership of, control of, or the 
power to vote shares of a bank or bank holding company and all of the 
banks and nonbanking companies owned by the bank holding company, 
including the companies listed below.
    The applications listed below, as well as other related filings 
required by the Board, are available for immediate inspection at the 
Federal Reserve Bank indicated. The applications will also be available 
for inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested 
persons may express their views in writing on the standards enumerated 
in the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1842(c)). If the proposal also involves the 
acquisition of a nonbanking company, the review also includes whether 
the acquisition of the nonbanking company complies with the standards 
in section 4 of the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1843). Unless otherwise noted, 
nonbanking activities will be conducted throughout the United States.
    Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding each of these 
applications must be received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the 
offices of the Board of Governors not later than October 2, 2018.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City (Dennis Denney, Assistant 
Vice President) 1 Memorial Drive, Kansas City, Missouri 64198-0001:
    1. American Bancorporation, Inc., Sapulpa, Oklahoma; to acquire 100 
percent of the voting shares of Peoples State Bancshares, Inc., and 
thereby indirectly acquire Peoples Bank, both of Tulsa, Oklahoma.
    2. First York Ban Corp, and Cornerstone Bank, both of York, 
Nebraska; to acquire voting shares of Franklin State Bancshares, Inc., 
and thereby acquire Franklin State Bank, both of Franklin, Nebraska.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, August 31, 
2018.
Ann Misback,
Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 2018-19292 Filed 9-5-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE P
```

[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 148 (Tuesday, August 2, 2011)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 46202]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: C1-2011-10401]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

10 CFR Parts 429 and 430

[Docket No. EERE-2010-BT-CE-0014]
RIN 1904-AC23

Energy Conservation Program: Certification, Compliance, and 
Enforcement for Consumer Products and Commercial and Industrial 
Equipment; Correction

Correction

    In rule document 2011-10401 appearing on pages 24762-24782 in the 
issue of May 2, 2011, make the following correction:

Sec.  429.54  [Corrected]

    On page 14780, the formula for Sec.  429.54(a)(2)(i)(B) should 
read:
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR02AU11.090

    And x is the sample mean; s is the sample standard deviation; n is 
the number of samples; and t0.99 is the t statistic for a 
99% two-tailed confidence interval with n-1 degrees of freedom (from 
Appendix A).

[FR Doc. C1-2011-10401 Filed 8-1-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 1505-01-P
```
EXHIBIT 32  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906  Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, the undersigned officer of LED Lighting Company (the "Company"), hereby certify to my knowledge that:  The Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2013 of the Company fully complies, in all material respects, with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained in the Report fairly represents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.   Date: August 14, 2013  /s/ Kevin Kearney Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
**SNAP CBI Substantiation Letter -**  **Sanitized**
**MPS GROUP, INC.**

 

**Exhibit 23**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

We hereby consent to theincorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-3 (Nos. 333-17715, 333-18695, 333-49505, 333-67271 and 333-106855) and on Form S-8 (Nos. 333-99262, 333-06899, 333-15701, 333-16043, 333-30445, 333-41305, 333-49495, 333-49493,333-58261, 333-69915, 333-79001, 333-88329, 333-64252, 333-131942 and 333-138759) of MPS Group, Inc. of our report dated March 14, 2006 relating to the consolidated financial statements, financial statement schedule, management’sassessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, which appears in this Form 10-K. 

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP 

Jacksonville, Florida 

February 28, 2007
ogng_ex1001.htm


EXHIBIT 10.01


 





 


Corporate Office: 35 South Ocean Avenue, Patchogue, New York, 11772


Phone: 1-888-488-6882 Fax: 1-888-265-0498


 


February 20, 2014







Water For The World Manufacturing Inc.


6654 Elijah Road


Wellpinit, WA, 99040


Attention: Max Rajewski







Dear Sir:








Re: Exclusive Licensing Agreement date November 23, 2012 between Water For The World Manufacturing Inc. and Bravo Enterprises Ltd.









Bravo Enterprises Ltd. received your undated letter on February 14, 2014 whereby you reference the above mentioned agreement and ...... “whereby Bravo Enterprises was to issue and deliver 120,000,000 shares in the capital stock of Bravo in consideration for the license granted by Water World to market and manufacture its patented air to water harvesters “ and further be ...... “advised that the license to distribute and or manufacture any of Water for the World’s products, and your right to use or make representations relating to any such license is hereby immediately revoked.”







Pursuant to Clause 10.00 – “Termination” and more specifically clauses 10.01.01 regarding breaching terms or conditions of the agreement and 10.02 regarding mutual termination by both parties, Water For The World Manufacturing Inc. formally terminated the agreement on February 14, 2014 and Bravo Enterprises Ltd. hereby confirms termination of the agreement on February 14, 2014 with certain provisions. Specifically, in consideration for the goodwill generated during the period of the exclusive license agreement between Water For The World Manufacturing Inc. and Bravo Enterprises Ltd., certain private transactions involving the beneficial owners of some of the 120,000,000 restricted common shares issued will be honored. These private transactions transpired prior to the cancellation of the above mentioned exclusive license agreement. Bravo Enterprises Ltd in the process of determining the exact amount of shares being honored due to the goodwill and the agreed amount will be reflected in the annual financial statements currently being audited.







As requested, a news release from Bravo Enterprises Ltd. was disseminated on February 14, 2014 informing all shareholders of the revocation of the above mentioned agreement.







Yours truly,


Bravo Enterprises Ltd.







/s/ Jaclyn Cruz







Jaclyn Cruz


President