alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report of Azaz Capital Corp. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),I, Robert Weber, herebycertify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

 

|   | (1) | The Report fully complies  with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange  Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

|   | (2) | The information contained  in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial  condition and results of operations of the Company as of the date and for the  periods expressed in the Report. |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

| /s/ Robert Weber        |
|-------------------------|
| Robert Weber            |
| Chief Financial Officer |
|                    |
| May 23, 2011            |

 

 

 

The foregoing certification is being furnished solelypursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and is not being filed as part of the Reportor as a separate disclosure document.

 

                                                                        

----
Exhibit 4.1







THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON


NEW YORK’S FIRST BANK-FOUNDED 1784 BY ALEXANDER HAMILTON


 


 


2 HANSON PLACE, 12TH FLOOR, BROOKLYN,
N.Y. 11217


 


 


 


February 25, 2014


 


Hennion & Walsh, Inc.


2001 Route 46, Waterview Plaza


Parsippany, New Jersey 07054


 


Smart Trust, Dynamic Sector Income Trust,
Series 8


Dear Sirs:


The Bank of New York
Mellon is acting as trustee for Smart Trust, Dynamic Sector Income Trust, Series 8 set forth above (the “Trust”).
We enclosed a list of the Securities to be deposited in the Trust on the date hereof. The prices indicated therein reflect our
evaluation of such Securities as of close of business on February 25, 2014, in accordance with the valuation method set forth in
the Trust Indenture and Agreement. We consent to the reference to The Bank of New York Mellon as the party performing the evaluations
of the Trust Securities in the Registration Statement (No. 333-193237) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission with respect
to the registration of the sale of the Trust Units and to the filing of this consent as an exhibit thereto.


 


 


	 	Very truly yours,
	 	 	 
	 	/s/ GERARDO CIPRIANO 
	 	 	Gerardo Cipriano
	 	 	Vice President
U.S. Department 

of Transportation 

Federal Aviation 

Administration 

SEP 1 6 2015 

Robert Glasscock 

Gulfstream Aerospac:e Corporation 

PO Box 2206, M/S R-02 

Savannah, GA 31402-2206 

Dear Mr. Glasscock: 

Transport Airplane Directorate 

1601 Lind Avenue, S.W. 

Renton, Washington 98057-3356 

We have received your petition letter no. G-ODA-15-0619, dated July 30, 2015, requesting 

relieffrom one part of§ 25.1447(c)(l) ofTitle 14, Code ofFederal Regulations, at 

amendment 25-1 16. 

This exemption, if granted, would allow the installation of a modified passenger-oxygen 

system on Gulfstream Model GVIT-G500 airplanes which, when operating into or out of an 

airfield with a pressure altitude up to 15,000 ft. , would allow the Cabin Pressure Control 

System (CPCS) and the passenger oxygen control panel to be configured to allow the cabin 

internal pressure altitude to reach as high as 15,300 feet during normal operations, and to 

minimize the possibility of nuisance passenger-oxygen-mask deployment during takeoff and 

descent at high-elevation airports. 

This request was published in the Department of Transportation's Federal Docket 

Management System (at regulations.gov) on August 13, 2015, and has been assigned Docket 

No. FAA-2015 -3 311. We are in the process of reviewing your request. We will contact you 

ifwe need additional information. 

If you have any questions or concerns regarding your petition or the petition process, please 

contact Robert Hettman at ( 425) 227-2683, or by e-mail at robert.hettman@faa.gov. 

Sincerely, 

Mark Forseth 

Transport Airplane Directorate 

Aircraft Certification Service
----

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.3311 — Van Oord/BHD/Bagger Holding JV)

(2005/C 101/10)

(Text with EEA relevance)

On 11 December 2003, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EEC) No 4064/89. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

----
#### Michael Volin, Appellant, v City Beach Catering Corporation, Respondent.

In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Hurowitz, J.), dated October 2, 1989, as denied that branch of his motion as was to dismiss five of the six defenses asserted in the defendant’s answer.

Ordered that the order is modified, on the law, by deleting the provision denying those branches of the plaintiff’s motion which were to dismiss the defenses of lack of personal jurisdiction and the Statute of Limitations, and substituting therefor a provision granting those branches of the motion; as so modified, the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements.

As is evidenced by the affidavit of service and the receipt from the Secretary of State, the defendant corporation was served with process correctly and in a timely fashion. Therefore, the defenses of lack of personal jurisdiction and the Statute of Limitations should have been dismissed.

The plaintiff has failed to establish that the remaining defenses asserted in the defendant’s answer have no merit *(see,*CPLR 3211 [b]). Therefore, the Supreme Court did not err in denying so much of the plaintiff’s motion as was to dismiss those defenses. Thompson, J. P., Brown, Harwood and Balletta, JJ., concur.
EXHIBIT 32.1

      CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Verve Ventures Inc. ("Company") on
Form 10-Q for the period ended April 30, 2011, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Leslie Clitheroe,
President and Chief Financial Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

     (1)  The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


Dated: June 14, 2011            By: /s/ Leslie Clitheroe
                                    --------------------------------------------
                                    Leslie Clitheroe, President, Chief Executive
                                    Officer and Chief Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 32.1

                  CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND
                           CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER OF
                            JASPER EXPLORATIONS INC.
          FORM 10-Q FOR THE NINE MONTH PERIOD ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2012
                 PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Robert Denman, am the Chief Executive Officer and acting Chief Financial
Officer of Jasper Explorations Inc., a Nevada corporation (the "Company"). I am
delivering this certificate in connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q
of the Company for the Nine month period ended September 30, 2012 and filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission ("Quarterly Report").

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I hereby certify that, to the best of my knowledge,
the Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information
contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Date: December 10, 2012               By: /s/ Robert Denman
                                          --------------------------------------
                                          Robert Denman
                                          Chief Executive Officer, President,
                                          acting Chief Financial Officer, acting
                                          Principal Accounting Officer and
                                          Director
Exhibit 10.4


 


Cardax, Inc.


2014 Equity Compensation Plan


 


Notice of Stock Option Grant


 


Cardax, Inc. (the “Company”)
hereby grants you the following Option to purchase shares of its common stock (“Shares”). The terms and conditions
of this Option are set forth in the Stock Option Agreement and the Cardax, Inc. 2014 Equity Compensation Plan (the “Plan”),
both of which are attached to and made part of this document.


 


Except as otherwise
defined herein, capitalized terms used in this Notice of Stock Option Grant shall have the meaning assigned to such terms in the
Plan.


 


	Date of Grant:	_________________
	 	 
	Name of Optionee:	_________________
	 	 
	Number of Option Shares:	The number of Option Shares equals the number of Shares necessary so that the number of Option Shares granted under this Option plus the number of Option Shares, if any, granted to the Optionee under the Plan in substitution for options issued under the Cardax Pharmaceuticals, Inc. 2006 Stock Incentive Plan equals _____ percent (___%) of the fully diluted shares of the Company on the Date of Grant.
	 	 
	Exercise Price per Share:	$0.625
	 	 
	Option Period:	Ten (10) years from the Date of Grant.
	 	 
	Type of Option:	ISO
	 	 
	Vesting Schedule:	Fifty percent (50%) of the shares subject to this Option are fully vested upon the Date of Grant and one-twelfth (1/12th) of remaining fifty percent (50%) of the shares shall vest on the first business day of each month following the Date of Grant.  [Notwithstanding the foregoing, one hundred percent (100%) of the shares subject to this Option shall be fully vested upon a Change in Control.]


 


By signing this Notice
of Stock Option Grant, you acknowledge receipt of a copy of the Plan and agree that: (a) you have carefully read, fully understand
and agree to all of the terms and conditions described in the attached Stock Option Agreement, the Plan document and the Notice
of Exercise and Common Stock Purchase Agreement; (b) you hereby make the purchaser’s investment representations contained
in the Exercise Notice with respect to the grant of this Option; (c) you understand and agree that the Notice of Stock Option Grant
and the Stock Option Agreement constitutes the entire understanding between you and the Company regarding this Option and that
any prior agreements, commitments or understandings concerning this Option are replaced and superseded; and (d) you have been given
an opportunity to consult your own legal and tax advisors with respect to all matters relating to this Option prior to signing
this Notice of Stock Option Grant and that you have either consulted such advisors or voluntarily declined to consult such advisors.


 


	______________	Cardax, Inc.
	 	 
	__________________________	By:____________________________
	 	Name:
	 	Title:
In The 

Court of Appeals 

Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo

No. 07-18-00135-CR 

DONALD EDWARD STOVALL, JR., APPELLANT 

 

V. 

 

THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE 

 

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 2 

Taylor County, Texas 

Trial Court No. 2-184-17, Honorable Harriett L. Haag, Presiding 

 

August 2, 2018 

 

MEMORANDUM OPINION 

 

Before QUINN, C.J., and CAMPBELL and PIRTLE, JJ. 

Pending before the Court is the motion of appellant Donald Edward Stovall, Jr. to 

dismiss his appeal. Appellant and his attorney have signed the motion. TEX. R. APP. P.

42.2(a). No decision of the Court having been delivered to date, we grant the motion. 

Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed. No motion for rehearing will be entertained and our 

mandate will issue forthwith.

James T. Campbell

 Justice

Do not publish.
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER ON MOTION

November 7, 2008 Revision

Cause number: 01-14-00335-CR

Style: Damion Gentry v. The State of Texas

Date motion filed*: August 18, 2014

Type of motion: Motion for Extension of Time to File Reporter’s Record

Party filing motion: Court reporter

Document to be filed: Reporter’s Record

Is appeal accelerated? No

If motion to extend time:

Original due date: June 16, 2014

Number of extensions granted: 2 Current Due date: August 16, 2014

Date Requested: September 16, 2014

Ordered that motion is:

 Granted

If document is to be filed, document due: September 16, 2014

 No further extensions of time will be granted absent extraordinary 

circumstances.

 Denied

 Dismissed (e.g., want of jurisdiction, moot)

 Other: _____________________________________ 

On June 17, 2014, the Clerk of this Court granted the reporter’s motion for

extension of time to file the record due to the appeal being about 3,000 pages. The

reporter did not timely file the record by July 16, 2014 or request an extension,

which likely would have been granted until August 16, 2014. Accordingly, the 

reporter’s motion, construed as her third motion for extension of time, is granted, 

but no further extensions will be granted absent extraordinary circumstances.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Laura C. Higley

  

Panel consists of ____________________________________________

Date: August 21, 2014
Third District Court of Appeal

State of Florida 

Opinion filed March 17, 2021.

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

No. 3D21-164

Lower Tribunal Nos. 20-212 CC, 20-128 AP

________________

Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's, London, 

Subscribing to Policy No. HH03 61785,

Appellant,

vs.

Osberto Jimenez,

Appellee.

An Appeal from the County Court for Miami-Dade County, Michael G. 

Barket, Judge.

Law Offices of Clinton D. Flagg, P.A., Clinton D. Flagg and Carol A. 

Fenello, for appellant.

Marin, Eljaiek, Lopez, & Martinez, P.L. and Anthony M. Lopez, for 

appellee.

Before SCALES, LINDSEY and GORDO, JJ. 

PER CURIAM.
2

Certain Underwriters at Lloyd’s London appeals the trial court’s order 

granting the insured’s motion to compel appraisal in this first party property 

insurance action. While the insurance policy at issue contained a general 

appraisal provision permitting either party to demand appraisal, the policy 

contained an unambiguous endorsement deleting and replacing that

general appraisal provision. The endorsement explicitly reserved to Lloyd’s

the sole right to require appraisal. “The law in Florida is clear that to the 

extent an endorsement is inconsistent with the body of the policy, the 

endorsement controls.” Allstate Fire & Cas. Ins. Co. v. Hradecky, 208 So. 

3d 184, 187 (Fla. 3d DCA 2016); see Fam. Care Ctr., P.A. v. Truck Ins. 

Exch., 875 So. 2d 750, 752 (Fla. 4th DCA 2004) (“Even if there were an 

ambiguity between the endorsement and the body of the policy, the 

endorsement, which is clear, controls.”); Fireman’s Fund Ins. Co. v. Levine 

& Partners, P.A., 848 So. 2d 1186, 1187 (Fla. 3d DCA 2003) (“[T]he terms 

of an endorsement such as the one sued upon control over anything 

purportedly to the contrary in any other insuring agreement . . . .”); Steuart 

Petroleum Co., Inc. v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyd’s London, 696 So. 2d 

376, 379 (Fla. 1st DCA 1997) (“[I]n general, to the extent an endorsement 

is inconsistent with the body of the policy, the endorsement controls.”). 

We, therefore, reverse the trial court’s order granting appraisal upon the 
3

insured’s motion as the policy’s endorsement unambiguously reserved to 

Lloyd’s the exclusive right to require appraisal. 

Reversed and remanded.
II 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 603 

To repeal the annual fee on health insurance providers enacted by the Patient 

Protection and Affordable Care Act. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 19, 2013 

Mr. BARRASSO (for himself, Mr. HATCH, Mr. JOHANNS, Mr. CRAPO, Mr. 

BURR, Mr. INHOFE, Mr. COATS, Mr. ISAKSON, Ms. AYOTTE, and Mr. 

WICKER) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To repeal the annual fee on health insurance providers 

enacted by the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Jobs and Premium 

5 Protection Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. PROTECTING PATIENTS FROM HIGHER PREMIUMS. 

7 Section 9010 of the Patient Protection and Afford8 able Care Act (Public Law 111–148), as amended by sec9 tion 10905 of such Act and by section 1406 of the Health 


pwalker on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 603 IS

1 Care and Education Reconciliation Act of 2010 (Public 

2 Law 111–152), is repealed. 

Æ 


pwalker on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)

In connection with this Report on Form 10-Q for the three months ended December 31, 2013, or the Report, of PennantPark Floating
Rate Capital Ltd., or the Registrant, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Aviv Efrat, Chief Financial Officer of the Registrant, hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                
|----------------
|/s/ Aviv Efrat  
|Aviv Efrat      
|February 6, 2014
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Finance and Accounting Service Providing payment services for the U.S. Department of Defense

Search
Search

Search

              - 
              - 
              - 
              - 
              - 

-  Military Member		 
-  Retired Military & Annuitant		 
-  Civilian Employee		 
-  Contractor & Vendor		 

HomelegislativeaffairsCongressional Inquiry Process

Submit an Inquiry**Inquiry Process**Forms and Helpful Resources1099R and W2 Tax Statements

### Congressional Inquiry Process

If the Division Chief finds everything to be in order, the response will be signed.Once signed, the Correspondence Specialist will forward to the Staffer and close the inquiry.
**Page updated February 9, 2021, 2021**

### Stay Connected

Department of Defense     Department of Veterans Affairs     Military Employment Verification     Warrior Care Website     Defense Contract Mgmt Agency  DoD Forms     Department of State     Civilian Personnel Mgmt Service     DTS Travel Center     System for Award Mgmt (SAM)    Congressional/LegislationPersonnel Force Innovation     Freedom of Information Act     DFAS Hotline   Contact Us     Accessibility / Section 508    EEO / No Fear Act  

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil
Exhibit 23.2


                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS


     We hereby  consent to the  incorporation  by reference in the  Registration
Statements  on  Form  S-3  (No.  333-33000,   333-94723,  333-64755,  333-64605,
333-59523,  333-57613,  333-81533,  333-51067,  333-45139, 333-37713, 333-25431,
333-81533  and  333-38068),  in the  Registration  Statements  on Forms S-8 (No.
333-31969,  333-93117, 333-92327, 333-11294, 33388421 and 333-39553), and in the
Registration   Statement  on  Forms  S-4  (No.  333-38420)  of  Applied  Digital
Solutions, Inc. and subsidiaries (formerly Applied Cellular Technology, Inc.) of
our report dated  February 24, 1998  relating to the  financial  statements  and
financial statement  schedule,  which appears in the Annual Report on Form 10-K,
as amended.




 /S/ Rubin, Brown Gornsetin & Co. LLP
Rubin, Brown Gornsetin & Co. LLP
St. Louis, Missouri
April 23, 2001
Exhibit 10.15



		

			Exhibit 10.15

		




		
			DIRECTOR COMPENSATION PROGRAM
		

		
			Approved February 5, 2014; Effective April 1, 2014;
		

		
			 
		

		
			ANNUAL CASH RETAINER: $75,000    
		

		
			Director may elect to take all or part of the retainer in shares of Company Stock.  Directors will be responsible for taxes on all such amounts.  If shares are elected for the cash portion of the retainer, they will be fully vested upon issuance.
		

		
			 
		

		
			SHARE AWARDS:
		

			
	
			
				 ·
			

			
	
			
			Annual grant of $100,000 of restricted stock (RSAs) under 2009 Equity Incentive Plan




			
	
			
				 ·
			

			
	
			
			RSA will vest one year from grant




			
	
			
				 ·
			

			
	
			
			Awards will be made on the later of two business days following the annual meeting or the first quarter earnings release




		
			 
		

		
			ADDITIONAL RETAINERS:
		

			
	
			
				 ·
			

			
	
			
			Board Chair $20,000




			
	
			
				 ·
			

			
	
			
			Audit Committee Chair $20,000




			
	
			
				 ·
			

			
	
			
			Compensation Committee Chair $10,000




			
	
			
				 ·
			

			
	
			
			Nominating Committee Chair $4,000




		
			ELIMINATING:
		

			
	
			
				 ·
			

			
	
			
			Per diems




			
	
			
				 ·
			

			
	
			
			Committee secretary retainers




			
	
			
				 ·
			

			
	
			
			All other retainers




		
			 
		

		
			OUT OF POCKET EXPENSES: Reimbursement of actual expenses for meetings and attendance at other board service events
		

		
			EXECUTIVES:  serving as directors will receive no director compensation or awards
		

		
			STOCK OWNERSHIP GUIDELINES:    Four times the annual share award retainer ($400,000)