alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5 
<LEGEND> 
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED 
FROM THE EARNINGS STATEMENT AND THE BALANCE SHEET AND IS 
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENT. 
THIS FINANCIAL DATA SCHEDULE IS RESTATED DUE TO THE CHANGE IN
ACCOUNTING STANDARD FOR EARNINGS PER SHARE (SFAS 128). 
</LEGEND> 
<RESTATED>  
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000 
        
<S>                             <C> 
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR 
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995 
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1995 
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995 
<CASH>                                         840,525 
<SECURITIES>                                         0 
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,628,515 
<ALLOWANCES>                                    93,106 
<INVENTORY>                                    975,554 
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             4,973,610 
<PP&E>                                       5,878,630 
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,485,405 
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              11,460,601 
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,639,928 
<BONDS>                                        603,108<F1> 
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0 
<PREFERRED>                                    290,778 
<COMMON>                                         5,066 
<OTHER-SE>                                   6,091,363 
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                11,460,601 
<SALES>                                      6,949,069 
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             7,094,619 
<CGS>                                        1,967,402 
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,967,402 
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,253,566<F2> 
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0 
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              94,139 
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,136,393 
<INCOME-TAX>                                   397,700 
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            738,693 
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0 
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0 
<CHANGES>                                            0 
<NET-INCOME>                                   738,693 
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.44 
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.41 
<FN> 
<F1>EXCLUDES COMPANY'S GUARANTEE OF ESOP DEBT:  267,200 
<F2>INCLUDES ONLY R&D EXPENSE. 
</FN> 
        


</TABLE>
MAR 1 7 2009 

Dr. ,Tames R. Moselev r 

Chair 

Farm, Ranch, and Rural 

Communities Committee 

7418 East Countyline Road South 

Clarks Hill, Indiana 47930 

Dear Dr. Moselev : 

THE ADMINISTRATOR 

I thank you and the members of the Farm, Ranch, and Rural Communities Committee for writing and for providing comments on the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's Draft Biofuel Strategy . 

The Agency steering committee overseeing completion of this document informed me that they have reviewed the FRRCC letter . Based on the FRRCC's comments, as well as the input of other external reviewers, significant modifications to the draft document have been made. Specifically, in consideration ofseveral key overarching comments by both the FRRCC and the National Advisory Council for Environmental Policy and Technology, the Draft Biofuel Strategy has been appropriately refocused into an EPA Coordinating Framework. The CF's goal is to promote and enhance intra-agency activities that anticipate and respond to existing and future potentially significant environmental impacts across the biofuel system . Another goal of the CF is to propose management recommendations, actions, and research necessary to support a sustainable biofuel system. 

The CF intends to guide coordination ot~EPA's cross-Agency multi-media 

responsibilities with regard to biofuels. Since biofuel production and use impact nearly all EPA 

programs and regions, effective coordination across all programs is vital for the Agency to accomplish its mission of protecting public health and the environment. The recommendations and actions included in the revised CF are essential and urgent if EPA is to full-ill its mission, including meeting current and new legislative mandates as well as related emerging issues. Establishing this CF emphasizes the need for strong cooperation and coordination across the Agency, as well as with federal, state, and other stakeholders. This is the foundation from which the Agency can develop and implement more effective and protective strategies. 

With regard to the specific comments provided in the attachment to your letter, they will be valuable in informing our current and future efforts in developing the proposed rule to 

UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 

WASHINGTON, D .C. 20460 

Internet Address (URL) 9 http :l/www .epa .gov Recycled/Recyclable * Printed with Vegetable Oil Based Inks on 100°o Postconsumer, Process Chlorine Free Recycled Paper 
implement the national Renewable Fuels Standard program as mandated under the Energy 

Independence and Security Act of 2007 . 

I thank the members of the FRRC'C for their time, considerable efforts, and support. 

The expertise, perspective, and guidance your committee offers will be of great value to the 

Agency in helping us meet our important mission . 

Again, thank you, and I look forward to the opportunity to meet with you and to hear 

your perspective and advice regarding these and other important issues . 

Sincerely, 

Lisa P . Jackson 

cc : Sally Shaver 

Alan Hecht 

Paul Argyropoulos 

Alicia Kaiser
Exhibit 32.2

AMERICAN REALTY CAPITAL PROPERITES, INC.

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A of American Realty Capital Properties, Inc. (the Company) for the
fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2014 (the Report), I, Michael Sodo, Executive Vice President, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify to my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                    |  |  |  |     |  |                                                                
|------------------- |  |  |  | --- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: March 2, 2015 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/ Michael Sodo                                               
|                    |  |  |  |     |  | Michael Sodo                                                   
|                    |  |  |  |     |  | Executive Vice President, Treasurer and
Chief Financial Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and
will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Page 1 of 3

Disposition Comments

Docket No: FAA-2012-0269 These comments are in

Directorate ID: 2011-NM-105-AD response to an SNPRM

Originating Office Tracking No.: 

Next Step: FRAN SNPRM

 No Comments/Only Supportive Comments Received – If this box is checked, no signatures are 

required.

 Has the referenced service information been revised since the NPRM was issued? If yes, 

list latest revision and attach a copy. Note that changes beyond the scope of the previously 

published NPRM will require a new notice. Contact the Directorate focal point for guidance.

Instructions: Summarize all comments by issue (not by commenter) and provide your recommended resolution of 

each issue. All comments relating to the same issue should be discussed together. Do not list all of the issues 

from one commenter together. If changes to the AD are required based on the comments received, explain why and 

describe in detail what change(s) you recommend. Reference FAA-IR-M-8040.1C Chapter 9.

ISSUE 1: Select one of the following: 

If other, explain: 

Commenter(s): 

What change to the AD action is requested? 

Why is the change requested or how is it justified? 

Do we agree? 

If YES, we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: 

If PARTIALLY AGREE, we agree with because We disagree with because 

Make the following changes to the AD: 

If NO, we don’t agree because 

ISSUE 2: Select one of the following: 

If other, explain: 

Commenter(s): 

What change to the AD action is requested? 

Why is the change requested or how is it justified? 

Do we agree? 

If YES, we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: 

If PARTIALLY AGREE, we agree with because We disagree with because 

Make the following changes to the AD:
Page 2 of 3

If NO, we don’t agree because 

For additional issues, double-click here
Page 3 of 3

Signature Section

Signature indicates concurrence with this action.

Originating Office Tracking No.: 

ASE Printed Name: Date

Branch Manager Date
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In
connection with the Annual Report of Miller Industries, Inc. (the Company) on
Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2003 filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Jeffrey I.
Badgley, President and Co-Chief Executive  Officer of  the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§ 1350 as adopted by § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|(1) | The Report
  fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
  Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                               
|--- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    |                                                                                                                                                         
|(2) | The
  information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
  respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated:  March 26, 2004

| | /s/ Jeffrey I. Badgley                                        | 
| | ------------------------------------------------------------- | 
| |                                                               | 
| | Jeffrey I. Badgley
  President and Co-Chief Executive Officer | 

---

---
**AD Economic Evaluation**

Docket No . FAA - 2013 - 0353 Directorate ID : 2008 - SW - 029 - AD Helicopter Model: Eurocopter France Model AS332C, AS332L , AS332L 1, AS332L2, and EC225LP Helicopters Number of Helicopters (U.S. Operators): 6 Helicopters in the US Registry . Reason : The actions of this AD are intended to prevent loss of the tail gearbox and loss of control of the helicopter. Costs : Parts per Helicopter $ 200 for three replacement bolts and the washers $1,921 for the tail gearb ox attachment fitting Labor per Helicopter ( 0.5 work- hour x $ 8 5 /workhour for the inspection ) Labor per Helicopter (0.5 work - hour x $85/work hour for the bolt replacement) Labor per Helicopter (40 work - hours x $85/work hour for the tail gearbox attachment fitting replacement) $ 43 $43 $3,400 Other (Explain) Total Cost per Helicopter $ 243 for the bolt replacement $5,321 for the tail gearbox attachment fitting replacement Total US Fleet Cost $ 258 for the inspection Executive Order 12866 : C ould the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action?” Yes ( ) No (  ) DOT Regulatory

Policies and Procedures : Is the AD significant? Yes ( ) Explain Below No (  ) Regulatory

Flexibility

Act : Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? Yes ( ) No (  ) Project Engineer : Gary

Roach
```

[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 109 (Thursday, June 6, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Page 34036]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-13500]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMISSION ON CIVIL RIGHTS

Sunshine Act Meetings

AGENCY: United States Commission on Civil Rights.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DATE AND TIME: Friday, June 14, 2013; 9:30 a.m. e.s.t.

PLACE: 1331 Pennsylvania Ave. NW., Suite 1150, Washington, DC 20425.

Meeting Agenda

I. Approval of Agenda
II. Program Planning
     Discussion and Vote on Ranking of Concept Paper Topics for 
the 2014 Statutory Enforcement Report
IV. Management and Operations
     Consideration of Changes to Business Meeting Calendar for 
August 2013
     Consideration of Commission Letter supporting Equal 
Opportunity in the U.S. Armed Forces for Sikh Americans
     Status Update on Agency Reorganization
     Staff Director's report
     Chief of Regional Programs report
V. Approval of State Advisory Committee Appointment Slates
     Kentucky
     New York
VI. Adjourn Meeting

CONTACT PERSON FOR FURTHER INFORMATION: Lenore Ostrowsky, Acting Chief, 
Public Affairs Unit (202) 376-8591.
    Hearing-impaired persons who will attend the meeting and require 
the services of a sign language interpreter should contact Pamela 
Dunston at (202) 376-8105 or at signlanguage@usccr.gov at least seven 
business days before the scheduled date of the meeting.

    Dated: June 3, 2013.
TinaLouise Martin,
Director of Management/Human Resources.
[FR Doc. 2013-13500 Filed 6-4-13; 11:15 am]
BILLING CODE 6335-01-P
```
Exhibit 99.2
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the Annual Report of Smith-Midland Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, John K.
Johnson, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

          (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
               or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

          (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
               material respects, the financial condition and results of
               operations of the Company.


                                              /s/ John K. Johnson
                                              ---------------------------------
                                              John K. Johnson
                                              Chief Financial Officer

                                              Dated: March 28, 2003


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Smith Midland Corporation and will be retained by Smith Midland
Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
upon request.
ESP Inspire 1 Preflight Checklist

Before Energizing System

1. Arms up and locked in flight position

2. Props installed on correct motors

3. Props tightened and locks in place

4. Props clean and undamaged

5. Motors turn smoothly

6. Battery secure

7. Wiring in good condition

8. Flight control system connections secure

9. Transmitter on

a. Transmitter vehicle select: SeedScout

b. Transmitter battery level > flight minimum

10. Ground Control Station (GCS) on 

a. Waypoints loaded, as appropriate

b. Waypoints in clear airspace, according to UAS flight rules

11. Flight battery voltage >= 90% maximum pack voltage

a. >= 22.7V for 6S LiPo flight pack

12. Weather forecast

a. VMC for duration of planned flight + 30 minutes

b. Winds < 15 kts steady, 25 kts gust

Energize System

13. Power system on

14. Monitor for correct startup sequence

15. On GCS:

a. Communications link established

b. GPS positioning locked

c. Accelerometers calibrated

d. Compass calibrated

e. Transmitter control direction correct

f. Altitude limitation set

g. Distance limitation set

Starting Motors

16. Position UAS at launch location

17. Establish position as “home”

18. Reset flight timer

19. Verify desired flight control mode

20. Verify surroundings are clear

a. “Clear Props!”
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 171 (Tuesday, September 4, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Pages 44876-44877]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-19230]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meeting

TIME AND DATE:  Thursday, September 6, 2018 at 2:00 p.m.

PLACE:  1050 First Street NE, Washington, DC.

STATUS:  This meeting will be closed to the public.

[[Page 44877]]


MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: 
Compliance matters pursuant to 52 U.S.C. 30109
Matters concerning participation in civil actions or proceedings or 
arbitration
* * * * *

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION:  Judith Ingram, Press Officer, 
Telephone: (202) 694-1220.

Laura E. Sinram,
Deputy Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2018-19230 Filed 8-30-18; 4:15 pm]
 BILLING CODE 6715-01-P
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 13-6023

EARL J. MORGAN, III,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

R. K. LEWIS, HCC Captain; J. W. KING, HCC Sergeant; DOBYNS, 

Sergeant; TUPPONS, HCC Corr. Officer; BRYANT, HCC Corr.

Officer; S. W. ALLEN, HCC Hearing Officer; D. R. DUGGER, 

GRCC Hearing Officer; JOYCETINE BOONE, GRCC Assist. Warden; 

A. DAVID ROBINSON, Regional Director; ELLIOT, Corr. Officer,

Defendants – Appellees,

and

PATRICK J. GURNEY, HCC Assist. Warden; DANIEL T. MAHON, HCC 

Warden,

Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of Virginia, at Alexandria. James C. Cacheris, Senior 

District Judge. (1:11-cv-01150-JCC-TCB)

Submitted: February 26, 2013 Decided: March 1, 2013

Before MOTZ, WYNN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
2

Earl J. Morgan, III, Appellant Pro Se. Richard Carson Vorhis, 

Senior Assistant Attorney General, Kate Elizabeth Dwyre, OFFICE 

OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for 

Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
3

PER CURIAM:

Earl J. Morgan, III appeals the district court’s order 

denying relief on Morgan’s 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. 

We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. 

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district 

court. See Morgan v. R. Lewis, No. 1:11-cv-01150-JCC-TCB (E.D. 

Va. Dec. 19, 2012). We also deny Morgan’s motion to appoint 

counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and 

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials 

before this court and argument would not aid the decisional 

process.

AFFIRMED
# C_2015382EN.01000401.xml

| 17.11.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 382/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.11.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 382/4

---

Notice for the attention of the data subject to whom the restrictive measures provided for in Council Regulation (EU) No 753/2011 as implemented by Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/2043 concerning restrictive measures directed against directed against certain individuals, groups, undertakings and entities in view of the situation in Afghanistan applies

(2015/C 382/03)

The attention of data subject is drawn to the following information in accordance with Article 12 of Regulation (EC) No 45/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council (1):

1

The legal basis for this processing operation is Council Regulation (EU) No 753/2011 (2), as implemented by Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/2043 (3).

2

3

The controller of this processing operation is the Council of the European Union represented by the Director-General of DG C (Foreign Affairs, Enlargement, Civil Protection) of the General Secretariat of the Council and the department entrusted with the processing operation is the Unit 1C of DG C that can be contacted at:

| Council of the European Union |
| --- |
| General Secretariat |
| DG C 1C |
| Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175 |
| 1048 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |
| Email: sanctions@consilium.europa.eu |

Council of the European Union

General Secretariat

DG C 1C

Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175

1048 Bruxelles/Brussel

BELGIQUE/BELGIË

Email: sanctions@consilium.europa.eu

The purpose of the processing operation is the establishment and updating of the list of persons subject to restrictive measures in accordance with Regulation (EU) No 753/2011, as implemented by Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/2043.

The data subjects are the natural persons who fulfil listing criteria as laid down in that Regulation.

The personal data collected includes data necessary for the correct identification of the person concerned, the Statement of Reasons and any other data related thereto.

The personal data collected may be shared as necessary with the European External Action Service and the Commission.

Without prejudice to restrictions provided for in Article 20(1)(a) and (d) of Regulation (EC) No 45/2001, requests for access, as well as requests for rectification or objection will be answered in accordance with section 5 of Council Decision 2004/644/EC (4).

4

Personal data will be retained for 5 years from the moment the data subject has been removed from the list of persons subject to the asset freeze or the validity of the measure has expired, or for the duration of court proceedings in the event they had been started.

Data subjects may have recourse to the European Data Protection Supervisor in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 45/2001.

---

(1)  OJ L 8, 12.1.2001, p. 1.

1

(2)  OJ L 199, 2.8.2011, p. 1.

2

(3)  OJ L 300, 17.11.2015, p. 1.

3

(4)  OJ L 296, 21.9.2004, p. 16.

4

---