alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
MEMORANDUM

To: Docket for SO2 NAAQS

From: Janet McCabe, OAR

Re: Meetings on the proposed SO2 NAAQS

Date: April 29, 2010

On 4/14/2010, EPA held a meeting at which provisions of the proposed SO2 National Ambient Air Quality 

Standards rule were discussed. Present at the meeting were Janet McCabe, Chet Wayland and Steve 

Page of EPA and Mark MacLeod and Vicky Patton of Environmental Defense. The topic discussed was 

the process for designating areas nonattainment under a future revised standard.

On 4/14/2010, EPA held a meeting at which provisions of the proposed SO2 National Ambient Air Quality 

Standards rule were discussed. Present at the meeting were Janet McCabe, Chet Wayland and Steve 

Page of EPA and Paul Billings and Janice Nolan of the American Lung Association. The topic discussed 

was the process for designating areas nonattainment under a future revised standard.

On 4/21/2010, EPA held a meeting at which provisions of the proposed SO2 National Ambient Air Quality 

Standards rule were discussed. Present at the meeting were Janet McCabe and Chet Wayland of EPA 

and John Walke of NRDC. The topic discussed was the process for designating areas nonattainment 

under a future revised standard.
EX-10.17



 Exhibit 10.17 

HUTTIG BUILDING PRODUCTS, INC. 

EVA EXECUTIVE INCENTIVE PLAN 

For the Year 2013 
 GENERAL 

The awards to participants in the EVA Incentive Compensation Plan, As Amended January 1, 2004 (the “EVA Plan”) of a Huttig Building
Products, Inc. (the “Company”) shall be pursuant to the terms of the EVA Plan, except as set forth below. The amendments to the EVA Plan with respect to the 2013 awards have been approved by the Board of Directors (the
“Board”) of the Company, upon recommendation of the Management Organization & Compensation Committee of the Board. 
 PAYMENT
OF 2013 INCENTIVE AWARDS 
  

	•	 	The 2013 EVA bonus awards shall be paid in full to the participants and no portion of such awards shall be banked or subject to forfeiture provided that the participant continues to be employed by the Company at the
date of payment(s); 

  

	•	 	The 2013 EVA bonus awards shall be paid on such date or dates in 2014 as determined by the President and Chief Executive Officer at his discretion; and 


 

	•	 	that the payment of any 2013 EVA award is subject to the participant’s continued employment with the Company through the date of payment; provided, that all 2013 EVA awards shall become immediately payable upon a
change in control of the Company, as defined in the Company’s standard change in control agreements. 

  

	 	•	 	Right to Change Plan 

 The Company reserves the right to modify or terminate the EVA Plan at any
time. 
  

	 	•	 	No Contract of Employment 

 Nothing contained herein shall be construed as a contract of
employment between the Company (or any of its subsidiaries) and any participant, or as giving a right to any person to continue in the employment of the Company or any of its subsidiaries or as limiting the right of the Company or any of its
subsidiaries to discharge any participant at any time, with or without cause.
*

*

* Information has been Redacted in accordance with the two principled exceptions of the 

Foreign Aid Transparency and Accountability Act (FATAA) of 2016; including the health 

and security of implementing partners, as well as national interest of the United States.
262 La. 131

#### Ewell J. THIBODEAUX v. ASSOCIATED DISTRIBUTING COMPANY, Inc.

No. 52473.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

May 30, 1972.

In re: Associated Distributing Co., Inc. applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, Parish of Acadia. 260 So.2d 46.

Writ denied. On the facts found by the Court of Appeal there is no error in the judgment complained of.
OVERSEAS PRIVATE INVESTMENT CORPORATION

2014 FEDERAL EMPLOYEE VIEWPOINT SURVEY RESULTS 

Percent 

Positive

Strongly 

Agree Agree

Neither 

Agree nor 

Disagree Disagree

Strongly 

Disagree

Item 

Response 

Total**

Do Not 

Know/ No 

Basis to 

Judge

N 48 67 24 9 9 157 NA

% 73.89 30.57 43.32 14.23 5.73 6.15 100.00 

N 46 75 23 9 2 155 NA

% 78.48 30.19 48.29 14.77 5.60 1.14 100.00 

N 50 59 19 18 9 155 NA

% 70.58 32.08 38.51 12.32 11.66 5.44 100.00 

N 53 70 19 11 4 157 NA

% 78.00 33.29 44.71 12.43 7.13 2.44 100.00 

N 73 62 15 4 2 156 NA

% 87.07 46.19 40.89 9.16 2.65 1.12 100.00 

N 57 68 17 8 5 155 NA

% 81.13 36.45 44.68 11.01 4.92 2.94 100.00 

N 106 46 2 0 2 156 NA

% 97.62 67.73 29.89 1.15 0.00 1.23 100.00 

N 87 60 4 2 2 155 NA

% 94.80 56.18 38.62 2.77 1.18 1.24 100.00 

N 18 54 27 31 26 156 0

% 47.30 11.97 35.33 17.46 19.78 15.46 100.00 

N 18 58 28 34 17 155 0

% 50.03 12.48 37.55 17.34 22.43 10.20 100.00 

N 27 59 23 23 14 146 0

% 58.82 18.55 40.27 16.15 15.50 9.53 100.00 

N 61 77 10 3 5 156 0

% 89.44 38.68 50.76 6.09 1.75 2.72 100.00 

Survey Administration Period: May 6, 2014 to June 13, 2014 Sample or Census: Census

Percentages are weighted to represent the Agency's population. Number of surveys completed: 157

* AES prescribed items Number of surveys administered: 193

** Unweighted count of responses excluding 'Do Not Know' and 'No Basis to Judge' Response Rate: 81.3%

My talents are used well in the workplace.

I am given a real opportunity to improve my skills in my 

organization.

I have enough information to do my job well.

I feel encouraged to come up with new and better ways of doing 

things.

I know what is expected of me on the job.

When needed I am willing to put in the extra effort to get a job 

done.

I am constantly looking for ways to do my job better.

I have sufficient resources (for example, people, materials, budget) to 

get my job done.

My workload is reasonable.

 

My work gives me a feeling of personal accomplishment.

*12.

6.

7.

8.

9.

*10.

*11.

I like the kind of work I do.

I know how my work relates to the agency's goals and 

priorities.

*1.

2.

3.

*4.

*5.
----

Prior notification of a concentration

(Case COMP/M.3755 — Nordic Capital/Nycomed)

Candidate case for simplified procedure

(2005/C 70/10)

(Text with EEA relevance)

----

(1)OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

(2)  Available on DG COMP website:

http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/legislation/consultation/simplified_tru.pdf.

----
##### 



Exhibit 23 Independent Auditors Consent The Board of Directors
DiamondCluster International, Inc.: We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements
(No. 333-31965, No. 333-88155, No. 333-92213, No. 333-50834, No.333-47830, No.
333-64276, No. 333-71208, No. 333-64278 and No. 333-67899) on Form S-8 of
DiamondCluster International, Inc. of our reports dated April 25, 2004, with
respect to the consolidated balance sheets of DiamondCluster International,
Inc. as of March 31, 2003 and 2004, and the related consolidated statements of
operations and comprehensive loss, stockholders equity, and cash flows for
each of the years in the three-year period ended March 31, 2004, and the
related financial statement schedule, which reports appear in the March 31,
2004, annual report on Form 10-K of DiamondCluster International, Inc. Our
report on the consolidated financial statements contains an explanatory
paragraph that describes the Companys changes in its method of accounting for
stock based compensation effective April 1, 2003, and its method of accounting
for goodwill as of January 1, 2002. /s/ KPMG LLP Chicago, Illinois
June 10, 2004
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4036 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4036

  To authorize the Secretary of Housing and Urban Development to make 
 organizations controlled by individuals who promote prejudice or bias 
 based on race, religion, or ethnicity ineligible for assistance under 
    programs administered by the Secretary, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 15, 1994

  Mr. King (for himself and Mr. Levy) introduced the following bill; 
   which was referred to the Committee on Banking, Finance and Urban 
                                Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To authorize the Secretary of Housing and Urban Development to make 
 organizations controlled by individuals who promote prejudice or bias 
 based on race, religion, or ethnicity ineligible for assistance under 
    programs administered by the Secretary, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Hate Group Public Funding Exclusion 
Act''.

SEC. 2. AUTHORITY OF SECRETARY.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary of Housing and Urban Development (in 
this Act referred to as the ``Secretary) may--
            (1) deem an organization to be ineligible for assistance 
        within the jurisdiction of the Department if the Secretary 
        determines that such organization is controlled by an 
        individual or individuals who promote prejudice or bias based 
        on race, religion, or ethnicity; and
            (2) refuse to provide assistance within the jurisdiction of 
        the Department to an organization because of the determination 
        under paragraph (1), notwithstanding any other qualifications 
        of the organization to receive such assistance.
    (b) Determination of Control.--The Secretary shall determine 
whether an organization is controlled by an individual or individuals 
for purposes of subsection (a).

SEC. 3. DEFINITION.

    For purposes of this Act, the term ``assistance within the 
jurisdiction of the Department'' includes any contract, grant, loan, 
cooperative agreement, insurance or guarantee of a loan, mortgage, or 
pool of mortgages, or other form of financial assistance provided 
through the Department of Housing and Urban Development.

                                 <all>
```
250 La. 253

#### STATE of Louisiana v. Gary DUNCAN.

No. 48573.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Feb. 20, 1967.

In re: Gary Duncan applying for writ of certiorari.

The application is denied. No error of law in-the ruling complained of.
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Sydney Bo PETERSON.

No. 60402.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Oct. 28, 1977.

In re: Sydney Bo Peterson applying for writs of certiorari, prohibition and mandamus.

Writ denied.
<PAGE>   1





                                                                       FORM 10-K

EXHIBIT 21.                SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                            State or Other
                                                                            Jurisdiction of
                                                                            Incorporation
         Name of Subsidiary                                                 or Organization
         ------------------                                                 ----------------
<S>                                                                         <C>
The Elco Corporation                                                        Ohio           (1)

         ELDISC Export Co. (100% owned by The Elco Corporation)             Delaware       (1)

         Harvel Plastics, Inc. (85% owned by The Elco Corporation)          Pennsylvania   (1)

Seibert-Oxidermo, Inc.                                                      Michigan       (1)
</TABLE>


(1) Financial statements of subsidiary companies are included in the
    Consolidated financial statements.
ACCEPTED

03-14-00374-CV

4035747

THIRD COURT OF APPEALS

AUSTIN, TEXAS

2/5/2015 12:46:53 PM

JEFFREY D. KYLE

CLERK

CAUSE NO. 03-14-00374-CV 

C & M JONES INVESTMENTS LP * IN THE COURT OF APPEALS 

* 

* 

v. * THIRD DISTRICT 

* 

* 

DONOVAN THOMAS * TRAVIS COUNTY, TEXAS 

MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE BRIEF 

TO THE HONORABLE JUDGE OF SAID COURT: 

Now comes C & M JONES INVESTMENTS LP, Appellee, by and through their attorney 

of record, who requests that the Court grant an extension of time to file Appellee's Reply Brief 

and in support shows as follows: 

I. 

The deadline for filing Appellants' Brief was on February 5, 2015. 

II. 

Appellee is requesting an extension of 14 days to complete Appellee's Brief because the 

death of Appellee counsel's grandmother. Specifically, Appellee's counsel has had to travel out 

of the area to attend services and make arrangements. This is Appellee's additional extension 

for time to file Reply Brief. 

WHEREFORE, PREMISES CONSIDERED, Appellants request an extension until 

February 19, 2015. 

 FILED IN 3rd COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 2/5/2015 12:46:53 PM JEFFREY D. KYLE Clerk
Respectfully submitted, 

~ Attorney for Appellant 

174 S. Guadalupe, Suite 106 

San Marcos, Texas 78666 

Telephone: 512-353-3803 

Fax: 512-353-7483 

cliffwmccormack@gmail.com 

SBN 00792683 

SWORN TO AND SUBSCRIBED TO by Cliff McCormack on the 5th day of February 

2015. 

,,,,~~ ~; , DAN MCCORMACK 

.,~'X ;::-~ Notary Public. State of Texas 

o ·.~ ... ~~ My CommiSSIOn Exp1res 

-=:.~;,.,,~~~.o June 01,2015 

'''1111'''' 

-?J/J r1 / . - A 

0~//1 · Notary Public, State ofTexas 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing Motion has been delivered to Donovan 

Thomason the s'" day of February 2015 via f~ 

Cliff McCormack 

CERTIFICATE OF CONFERENCE 

I certify that I have previously con rred or attempted to confer with Donovan Thomas. 

Cliff McCormack 

2
MPS GROUP, INC.



Exhibit 32.2

MPS GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006 of MPS Group, Inc. (the Form 10-K), I,
Robert P. Crouch, Senior Vice President, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Form 10-K fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                                                               
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                               
|/s/    Robert P. Crouch                                                                        
|Robert P. Crouch Senior Vice President, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer February 27, 2007
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

MICHAEL OGRODNICK,

Appellant,

v.

MICHELLE OGRODNICK,

Appellee.

No. 4D21-2938

[October 20, 2022]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm 

Beach County; Dina A. Keever-Agrama, Judge; L.T. Case No. 

502019DR008171XXXXNB.

Troy W. Klein of Law Office of Troy W. Klein, P.A., West Palm Beach, for 

appellant.

No brief filed for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

LEVINE, CONNER and KUNTZ, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v.
JUAN LEON

- CORDOVA,

Defendant

- Appellant. No. 15

- 505 27
D.C. No. 3:15

- cr - 01494

- LAB

MEMORANDUM *

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California Larry A. Burns, District Judge, Presiding Submitted February 14, 2017 **
Before: GOODWIN, FARRIS, and FERNANDEZ, Circuit Judges.
Juan Leon

- Cordo v a appeals from the district court’s judgment and challenges the 60

- month sentence following his jury

- trial conviction for being a removed alien found in the United States, in vi olation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 

# FILED

FEB 22 2017
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLER K U.S. COURT OF APPEAL S2 15

- 50527

Leon

- Cordo v a contends tha t the district court erred by enhancing his
sentence under section § 1326(b). Specifically, he argues that Almendarez

- Torres
v. United States , 523 U.S. 224 (1998), which permits an enhancement based on the existence of a prior felony, is invalid under App rendi v. New Jersey , 530 U.S. 466, 490 (2000). As Leon

- Cordo v a acknowledges, this argument is foreclosed. See
United States v. Pacheco

- Zepeda , 23 4 F.3d 411, 414 (9th Cir. 2000) ( Apprendi
“u nmistakably carved out a n exception for ‘prior convictions’ that specifically preserved the holding of Almendarez

- Torres ”) ; see also Alleyne v. United States , 133 S. Ct. 2151, 2160 n.1 (2013) (declining to revisit Almendarez

- Torres )

. AFFIRMED.
EXHIBIT 32.2

CONTANGO ORE, INC.

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of
Contango ORE, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2011 (the Report), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Sergio Castro, Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge, that:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                       
|-----------------------
|Dated: May 16, 2011    
|                       
|/s/ SERGIO CASTRO      
|Sergio Castro          
|Chief Financial Officer
2098_Lake Road_6_Part_III_Process_Data_notes.txt

This file contains additional information for the 2098_Lake Road_6_Part_III_Process_Data.xls

Process Data_Metals_Testing worksheet: The unit 6 boiler is fueled by 80% a subbituminous coal & 20% 

bituminous coal blend. The Flue Gas Flow Rate (dscfm) was calculated by using plant provided data in 

scfm and average moisture data for the metals test series.

Page 1
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFOMRATION EXTRACTED FROM 
     THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONTAINED IN THE COMPANY'S FORM 10-k AND IS 
     QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS. 
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                    12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                             JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                JUL-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                  JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                        191,629
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  59,420
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                   482,446
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                              871,171
<PP&E>                                        595,222
<DEPRECIATION>                                442,105
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              1,627,291
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                         436,485
<BONDS>                                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                         0
<PREFERRED>                                   0
<COMMON>                                      54,016
<OTHER-SE>                                   790,541
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               1,627,291
<SALES>                                      171,079
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             628,694
<CGS>                                        723,327
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                882,524
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             (28,801)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                             0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            56,069
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           (1,004,425)
<INCOME-TAX>                                  0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       (1,004,425)
<DISCONTINUED>                                0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                               0
<CHANGES>                                     0
<NET-INCOME>                              (1,004,425)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (.19)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (.19)
        


</TABLE>