# Q

V€OU A ONM€NTA L 5€

r 

# Comprehensive Performanc e Tes t Repor t Fixe d Heart h Incinerato r - Uni t 2 Fixe d Heart h Incinerato r - Uni t 3 Rotar y Kil n Incinerato r - Uni t 4

Veoli a E S Technica l Solutions , LLC . 7 Mobil e Avenu e Sauget , Illinoi s 6220 1

January 28,201 4

# UR

S
40 CF R §6 3 Subpart EE E Comprehensiv e Performanc e Tes t Repor t fo r Fixe d Heart h Incinerato r - Uni t 2 Fixe d Heart h Incinerato r - Uni t 3 Rotary Kil n Incinerato r - Uni t 4

Prepare d for : Veoli a E S Technica l Solutions , L.L.C .

7 Mobil e Avenu e Sauget , I L 6220 1

Prepare d by : UR S Corporatio n 940 0 Ambergle n Blvd . Austin , T

X 7872 9

January 28 , 201 4 UR S Corporatio n 940 O Ambergle n Boulevar d Austin , T

X 7872 9 P.O . Bo x 20108 8 Austin , T

X 78720-108 8 Tel : 512,454.479 7 Fax : 512.454.880 7 www.urscorp.co m 

### VES01767 0

## Tabl e o f Contents Pag e 1. 0 Introductio

n 1- 1 1. 1 Incinerato

r Overview 1- 2 1. 2 Tes t Objective s 1- 3 1. 3 Tes t Protoco l Summar

y 1 -4 1. 4 CP T Schedul

e 1- 9 1. 5 Summar

y o f Result s 1-1 0 1. 6 Repor

t Organizatio n 1-1 0 2. 0 Proces

s Operation

s - 2- 1 2. 1 Proces s Overvie w 2- 1 2. 2 Proces s Operatin

g Dataan dWast e Feedrates 2- 6 2.2. 1 Uni t

2 2- 6 2.2. 2 Uni t

3 2- 6 2.2. 3 Uni t

4 2- 7 2. 3 Spikin g o f

Metal s an

dChlorin e 2- 7 3. 0 Sampling

, Analysis, an

d Monitorin

g Procedure

s 3- 1 3. 1 Sampling Location s an dProcedure s 3- 1 3.1. 1 Liquid s Sampling Procedure s 3- 1 3.1. 2 Solid s Samplin g Procedure s 3- 6 3.1. 3 Stac

k Ga s Samplin g Procedure s 3- 6 3.1.3. 1 Sample Por

t Location s 3-1 0 3.1.3. 2 EP A Method s 2 an d 4 (Flowrat

e an dMoisture ) 3-1 0 3.1.3. 3 EP A Metho d5 (PM ) 3-1 0 3.1.3. 4 Modifie dEP A Metho d26 A (HC1/C1 2 

### ) 3-1 1 3.1.3. 5 EP A Metho d2

9 (Metals ) 3-1 1 3.1.3. 6 SW-84 6 Metho d0023 A (Dioxins/Furans ) 3-1 2 3.1.3. 7 Continuou s Emission s Monitorin g (THC , C0 2 

### , C O an d0 2 

### ) 3-1 3 3. 2 Analysi s Procedure s 3-1 3 3.2. 1 Compositio n an

dPhysical Parameter

s Analysi s 3-1 4 3.2. 2 Metal s Analysi s 3-1 4 3.2. 3 P M Analysi s 3-1 4 3.2. 4 HCI

/CI2 Analysi s 3-1 4 

### 3.2. 5 Dioxins/Furan s Analysi s 3-1 5 3. 3 Proces s Monitorin g Procedure s 3-1 5

ii i
VES01767 1

## Tabl e o f Contents (continued ) Pag e 4. 0 Result

s 4- 1 4. 1 Wast

e Feedstream

s 4- 1 4. 2 Stac

k Gas 4-1 8 4.2. 1 P M i n Stac

k Ga s 4-1 8 4.2. 2 HC1/C1 2

### i n Stac

k Ga s 4-2 2 4.2. 3 Metal s i n Stac

k Ga s 4-2 6 4.2. 4 Dioxins/Furan s i n Stac k Ga s 4-3 4 4.2. 5 TH C i n Stac

k Ga s 4-3 9 4. 3 Chlorine , Ash , an

dMetal s Feedrate s 4-4 1 4.3. 1 Chlorin e Feedrate s 4-4 1 4.3. 2 As h Feedrate s 4-4 1 4.3. 3 Metal s Feedrate s 4-4 8 5. 0 Qualit

y Assurance/Qualit

y Contro l ........ . .5- 1 5. 1 Audi t

Sample s 5- 2 5. 2 Analysi s o f

Wast e Feeds 5- 2 5.2. 1 Analysi s o f

Wast e Feeds fo r

Metal s 5- 2 5.2. 2 Analysi s o f

Wast e Feeds fo r

Physica l an dChemica

l Parameter

s 5- 4 5. 3 Stac

k Ga s 5- 5 5.3. 1 Isokineti c Sampl

e Collectio n 5- 5 5.3. 2 Analysi s o f

Stac k Ga s Sample s fo r

Determination o f

P M 5- 6 5.3. 3 Analysi s o f

Stac k Ga s Sample s fo r

Determination o f

HC1/C1 3 5- 6 5.3. 4 Analysi s o f

Stac k Ga s Sample s fo r

Determination o f

Metal s 5- 7 5.3. 5 Analysi s o f

Stac k Ga s Sample s fo r

Determination o f

Dioxins/Furan s 5- 8 5.3. 6 Monitorin g o f

Stac k Gas fo r 0 2 

### , C0 2 

### , an

dTH C 5- 9 5.4 Proces s Data5- 9 5. 5 Spikin g 5-1 0

i v
VES01767 2

## List o f Appendice s APPENDI

X A - CEM S RAT A Report s APPENDI

X B- Spikin g Repor

t APPENDI

X C-Proces s Operatin

g Dat a APPENDI

X D - CM S Performanc

e Evaluation Tes

t Repor t APPENDI

X E - Chains-of-Custody/Fiel dLogboo k APPENDI

X F- Samplin g Documentatio n APPENDI

X G

- Analytica l Dat

aReport s APPENDE

D G l - Laborator

y Report s - Analysi s o f

Liqui dan dSoli dWast

e Fee d Sample s fo r

Metals , Total Chlorine , Ash , an dPhysica l Parameter s APPENDI

X G2

- Laborator

y Reports - Analysi s o f

Stac k Sample s fo r Dioxins/Furan s APPENDIX G 3 - Laborator y Report s - Analysi s o f

Stac k Sample s fo r

Metal s APPENDD

X G 4 - Laborator

y Report s - Analysi s o f

Stac k Sample s fo r

Particulat

e Matter , Hydrogen Chloride , an dChlorin e APPENDI

X G 5 - Laborator

y Reports - Analysi s o f

Spik e Material s APPENDI

X G 6 - Audi t

Repor t APPENDI

X H - Dat

aQualit y Assessment

s APPENDI

X I - Samplin

g Equipment/Instrumentatio n Calibratio n Documentatio n

v VES01767 3

## List o f Table s Pag e 1- 1 Applicabl e HW C MAC T Emissio n Standard s 1-3 1- 2 Dat aUse dT o Establis h OPL s 1 - 8 1- 3 Uni t 2 Complianc e Summar

y 1-1 1 1

- 4 Uni t

3 Complianc e Summar

y 1-1 2 1 - 5 Uni t 4 Complianc e Summar

y 1-1 3 2

- 1 Uni t

2 - Summar

y o f Proces s Dat

aan dFeedrate s Durin g th

e EP A Metho d5 Stac

k Sampling fo r

P M 2- 8 2- 2 Um

t 2-Summar y o f

Proces s Dataan

dFeedrate s Durin g th

e Modifie dEP A Metho d26 A Stac

k Sampling fo r

HC1/C1 2

### 2- 9 2- 3 Uni t

2 - Summar

y o f Proces s Dat

aan dFeedrates Durin g th

e EP A Metho d2

9 Stac k Samplin g fo r Metal s 2-1 0 2- 4 Uni t 2 - Summar

y o f Proces s Dat

aan dFeedrates Durin g th

e SW-84 6 MethodO

O 23 A Stac k Samphn g fo r Dioxins/Furan s 2-1 1 2-5 Uni t

3 - Summar

y o f Proces s Dat

aan dFeedrate s During th

e EP A Metho d5 Stac

k Samplin g fo r P M 2-1 2 2- 6 Uni t

3 - Summar

y o f Proces s Dat

aan dFeedrate s Durin g th

e Modifie dEP A Metho d26 A Stack

Sampling fo r

HC1/C1 2

### 2-1 3 2-7 Uni t

3 - Summar

y o f Proces s Dat

aan dFeedrate s Durin g th

e EP A Metho d2

9 Stac k Samplin g fo r Metal s 2-1 4 2- 8 Uni t

3 - Summar

y o f Proces s Dat

aan dFeedrates Durin g th

e SW-84 6 Metho d0023 A Stac k Sampling fo r

Dioxins/Furan s 2-1 5 2- 9 Uni t

4 - Summar

y o f Proces s Dataan

dFeedrate s Durin g th

e EP A Metho d5 Stac

k Samplin g fo r P M 2-1 6 2-1 0 Uni t

4 - Summar

y o f Proces s Dataan

dFeedrate s Durin g th

e Modifie dEP A Metho d26 A Stack

Sampling fo r

HC1/C1 2

### 2-1 7 2-1 1 Uni t

4 - Summar

y o f Proces s Dat

aan dFeedrates Durin g th

e EP A Metho d2

9 Stac k Samplm g fo r Metal s 2-1 8 2-1 2 Uni t

4 - Summar

y o f Proces s Dataan

dFeedrate s Durin g th

e SW-84 6 Metho d0023 A Stac k Sampling fo r

Dioxins/Furan s 2-1 9 2-1 3 Uni t

2 - Chlorin e Spikin g Rate s Durin g th e HC1/HC1 2

### Stac

k Samplin g 2-2 0 2-1 4 Uni t

3 - Chlorin e Spikin g Rates Durin g th e HC1/HC1 2

### Stac

k Samplin g 2-2 0 2-1 5 Uni t

4 - Chlorin e Spikin g Rates Durin g th e HC1/HC1 2

### Stac

k Samplin g 2-2 0 2-1 6 Uni t

2 - Spikin g Rate s Durin g th e Metal s Stac

k Sampling 2-2 1 2-1 7 Uni t

3 - Spikin g Rate s Durin g th e Metal s Stac

k Sampling 2-2 1 2-1 8 Uni t

4 - Spikin g Rate s Durin g th e Metal s Stac

k Samphn g 2-2 1

v i
VES01767 4

## List o f Table s (continued ) Pag e 2-1 9 Uni t

2 - Analytical Results fo r th e Chromiu

mSpikin g Solutio n 2-2 2 2-2 0 Uni t 2 - Analytical Results fo r th e Mercur y Spikin g Solutio n 2-2 2 2-2 1 Uni t

3 - Analytical Result s fo r th e ChromiumSpikin g Solutio n 2-2 3 2-2 2 Uni t 3 - Analytica l Results fo r th e Mercur y Spikin g Solutio n 2-2 3 2-2 3 Uni t 4 - Analytical Results fo r th e ChromiumSpikin g Solutio n 2-24 2

- 2 4 Uni t 4 - Analytical Results fo r th e Mercur y Spikin g Solutio n 2-2 4 3

- 1 Measuremen

t Frequenc y 3- 3 3- 2 Sampling Method s 3- 4 3-3 Uni t

2 - Summar

y o f Isokineti c S ampling 3- 7 3 4 Uni t

3 - Summar

y o f Isokineti c Sampling 3- 8 3- 5 Uni t 4 - Summar

y o f Isokineti c Sampling 3- 9 3

- 6 Summar

y o f Analytical Method s 3-1 3 4

- 1 Uni t

2 - Analytica l Result s fo r Chlorine , Ash , Metals , an

dPhysica l Parameter

s i n th e Low-Bt u Liqui dWast

e Fee d4- 5 4- 2 Uni t

2 - Analytica l Results fo r Chlorine , Ash , Metals , an

dPhysica l Parameter

s i n th e High-Bt u Liqui dWast

e Feed4- 6 4- 3 Uni t

2 - Analytica l Result s fo r Chlorine , Ash , Metal s an

dPhysica l Parameter

s i n th e Specialt y Liqui dWast

e Fee d4- 7 4-4 Uni t

2 - Analytica l Result s fo r Chlorine , Ash , Metal s an

dPhysica l Parameter

s i n th e ContainerizedSolid s Wast e Feed4- 8 4- 5 Uni t

3 - Analytica l Results fo r Chlorine , Ash , Metals , an

dPhysica l Parameter

s i n th e Low-Bt u Liqui dWast

e Feed4- 9 4- 6 Uni t

3 - Analytica l Results fo r Chlorine , Ash , Metals , an dPhysica l Parameter

s i n th e High-Bt u Liqui dWast

e Feed4-1 0 4-7 Uni t

3 - Analytica l Results fo r Chlorine , Ash , Metal s an

dPhysical Parameter

s i n th e Specialt y Liqui dWast

e Feed4-1 1 4- 8 Uni t

3 - Analytica l Results fo r Chlorine , Ash , Metal s an

dPhysica l Parameter

s i n th e ContainerizedSolid s Wast e Feed4-1 2

vi i
VES01767 5

## Lis t o f Table s (continued ) Pag e 4- 9 Uni t 4 - Analytical Results fo r Chlorine , Ash , Metals , an dPhysica l Parameter

s i n th e Low-Btu Liqui dWast

e Feedt o th e Kil n 4-1 3 4-1 0 Uni t

4 - Analytical Results fo r Chlorine , Ash , Metals , an dPhysica l Parameter

s i n th e High-Bt u Liqui dWast

e Feedt o th e Kil n 4-1 4 4-1 1 Uni t

4 - Analytical Result

s fo r Chlorine , Ash , Metal s an

dPhysical Parameter

s i n th e Liqui dWast

e Feedt o th e SC C .4-1 5 4-1 2 Uni t

4 - Analytical Results fo r Chlorine , Ash , Metal s an

dPhysica l Parameter

s i n th e Containerize dSolid s Wast e Fee d4-1 6 4-1 3 Uni t

4 - Analytical Results fo r Chlorine , Ash , Metal s an

dPhysica l Parameter

s i n th e Bul k Solid s Wast

e Feed4-1 7 4-1 4 Uni t

2 - Result s o f

P M i n Stac

k Ga s 4-1 9 4-1 5 Uni t

3 - Result s o f

P M i n Stac

k Ga s 4-2 1 4-1 6 Uni t

4 - Result s o f

P M i n Stac

k Gas 4-2 2 4-1 7 Uni t

2 - Result s o f

HC1/C1 2

### i n Stac

k Ga s 4-2 3 4-1 8 Uni t

3 - Result s o f

HC1/C1 2

### i n Stac

k Gas 4-2 5 4-1 9 Uni t

4 - Result s o f

HC1/C1 2

### i n Stac

k Gas 4-2 5 4-2 0 Uni t 2 - Analytica l Results o f

Metal s i n Stac

k Ga s 4-2 7 4-2 1 Uni t

2 - Result s o f

Metal s i n Stac

k Ga s 4-2 8 4-2 2 Uni t 3 - Analytica l Results o f

Metal s i n Stac

k Ga s 4-2 9 4-2 3 Uni t 3 - Result s o f

Metal s i n Stac

k Ga s 4-3 0 4-2 4 Uni t 4 - Analytical Results o f

Metal s i n Stac

k Ga s 4-3 2 4-2 5 Uni t 4 - Result s o f

Metal s i n Stac

k Ga s 4-3 3 4-26 Uni t

2 - Result s o f

Dioxins/Furan s i n Stac

k Ga s 4-3 5 4-2 7 Uni t 3 - Result s o f

Dioxins/Furan s i n Stac

k Gas 4-3 7 4-2 8 Uni t

4 - Result s o f

Dioxins/Furan s i n Stac

k Ga s 4-3 8 4-2 9 Uni t 2 - Result s o f

TH C i n Stac

k Ga s 4-3 9 4-3 0 Uni t

3 - Result s o f

TC H i n Stac

k Ga s 4-4 0 4-3 1 Uni t

4 - Result s o f

TH C i n Stac

k Ga s 4-4 0 4-3 2 Uni t

2-Chlorin e Feedrat

e 3-4 2 4-3 3 Uni t

3 - Chlorin e Feedrat

e 3-4 3 4-3 4 Uni t

4-Chlorin e Feedrat

e 3-4 4

vii i VES01767 6

## List o f Table s (continued ) Pag e 4-3 5 Uni t

2 - As h Feedrat

e Durin g th

e EP A Method5 Stac

k Samplin g fo r

P M 4-4 5 4-3 6 Uni t

3 - As h Feedrat

e Durin g th

e EP A Metho d5 Stac

k Samplm g fo r P M 4-4 6 4-3 7 Uni t

4 - As h Feedrat

e Durin g th

e EP A Metho d5 Stac

k Samplin g fo r

P M 4-4 7 4-3 8 Uni t

2 - Metal s Feedrat

e 4-4 9 4-3 9 Uni t

2 - HW C MAC T Metal s Feedrat e 4-5 1 4-4 0 Uni t 3 - Metal s Feedrat

e 4-5 2 4-4 1 Uni t

3 - HW C MAC T Metal s Feedrat e 4-5 3 4-42 Uni t

4-Metal s Feedrat

e 4-5 4 4

- 4 3 Uni t

4 - HW C MAC T Metal s Feedrat e 4-5 6 5

- 1 Results o f

Analysi s o f

Audi t Sample s 5- 2 

## Lis t o f Figure s Pag e 2- 1 Uni t

2 Proces s Flo w Diagra

m2- 3 2- 2 Uni t

3 Proces s Flo w Diagra

m2- 4 2- 3 Uni t

4 Proces s Flo w Diagra

m2- 5

i x VES01767 7

## 1.

0 Introductio n Veoli aE S Technica

l Solutions , L.L.C . (Veoha ) operates thre

e incinerators a

t it s Sauget, Illinoi s facility
. Tw o o f

th e incinerators ar

e fixed heart

h units (Unit s 2 an

d 3) , an d th e thir d incinerato r i s arotar y kil n unit

(Uni t 4) . Al l o f th e incinerator

s trea t certai n wastes tha

t ar e classifie da

s hazardou s unde

r stat e and/o r federa l regulations , an

d ar e subjec t t o th e Nationa l Emissio n Standards fo r

Hazardou s Ai r

Pollutant s (NESHAPs ) fo r Hazardou s Wast

e Combustor

s (Titl e 4 0 o f

th e Cod e o f Federa l Regulations , Par

t 63 [4 0 CF RPar

t 63] , Subpar

t EEE) , (le., th

e HW C MACT) . I n Augus t an d Septembe

r o f 2008 , Veoli aconducte

d test s o f Unit s 2 , 3 , an

d 4 require d by th e informatio n collectio n request s fro mU.S . EP A Regio n 5 date d Jun e 5 , 200 8 an

d Septembe

r 12, 2008 . Thos e test

s bega n on Augus t

11 , 200 8 fo r

Uni t 2 , Augus t

5 , 200 8 fo r

Uni t 3 , an d Augus t 21,200 8 fo r

Uni t 4 followin g tes

t plan s approve

d b y U.S . EP A Regio n 5 . Initial Comprehensive Performanc e Test s (CPTs ) o f

Unit s 2 , 3 , an

d 4 commence

d o n Decembe

r 8 , 200 9 for Uni t 2 ; on Decembe

r 1 , 200 9 fo r Uni t 3 ; an d on Decembe

r 16,200 9 fo r

Uni t 4 , an d wer e performed i n accordance wit h Comprehensiv

e Performanc e Test

Plan s approve

d b y U.S . EP A Regio n 5.Th

e HW C MACT , a

t 4 0 CF R§ 63.1207(d) , states "The date of commencement

ofthe initial comprehensive performance test is the basis

for establishing the deadline to commence the initial confirmatory perfonnance test and the next comprehensive performance test. You may conduct performance testing at

any time prior

to the required

date. The deadline for commencing subsequent

confirmatory and

comprehensive performance testing is based on the date of commencement

of the previous comprehensive performance test." EP A Regio n 5 considers tha

t th e star t o f th e subsequen

t CPT s be base

d on th e initiatio n o f

th e metal s test

s performed i n 2008 , requirin g tha t th e subsequen

t CP T be starte

d b y Septembe

r 5 , 2013 , an

d tha t asite-specifi c tes

t pla n b e submitte d befor e thi s date
. Veoli aoriginall y submitte d t o EP A it s notificatio n o f

inten t an d site-specifi c tes

t plan s (i.e. , comprehensiv e performance tes

t plans ) fo r al l thre e units an d aQualit y Assuranc e Projec t

Plan (QAPjP ) fo r

th e subsequen

t CP T o n Septembe r 5 , 2012 . Revision s t

o th e CP T Plan s an

d QAPj P wer

e mad e base d on negotiation s wit h EP A Regio n 5 . Th

e CP T Pla n an d QAPj P date

d Septembe

r 25,201 3 wer

e approve d b y EP A Regio n 5 . EP A Regio n 5 considers tha t testin g o f th e thre e incinerator s comprise s th e CP T fo r Veolia' s facilit y i n Sauget . Veoh aSauge t starte d th e CP T o f th e thre e incinerators a

t th e Sauge t facilit y o n Septembe

r 4 , 201 3 wit

h th e performanc e o f

th e RAT A o f

th e C O an d 0 2

### continuou s monitorin g system

s (CEMS ) o f

Uni t 4 . Th e RAT A o f

th e C O an d 0 2

### CEM S o f

Uni t 3 wa s performed o

n Septembe

r 5 , 2013 , an

d th e RAT A o f

th e C O an d 0 2

### CEM S o f

Uni t 2 wa s performed on Septembe

r 6,2013 . Testing fo r

th e applicabl e parameter

s o f th e HW C MAC T includin g dioxins/furans , tota l hydrocarbon s (THC) , carbon monoxid e (CO) , particulat

e matte r 1- 1 VES01767 8

### (PM) , hydroge n chloride/chlorin e ga

s (HC1/C1 2



### ) , mercury , SVM , an

dLV M wa

s complete

do n Octobe r 30,2012 . I

n accordance wit

h 4 0 CF R§63.1207(j)(l)(i ) an d§63.1207(j)(3) , th

e Notificatio n o f

Complianc e (NOC ) an

dCP T Repor

t ar e bein g file dwithi n 9 0 day s o f completio n of th e CPT . Pe r 4 0 CF R§63.1206(b)(7)(i)(A) , complianc e wit h th e DR E standar

di s requiredt

o b e demonstrate

donl y on e time , an dVeoli aSauge

t demonstrate

dDR E durin g RCR A Tria l Bum s o f Unit s 2 , 3 , an

d 4 performe d i n Januar

y 1993 , Novembe

r 1996 , an dDecembe

r 1995 , respectively
. Th e HW C MAC T require s tha t DR E only b

e demonstrate

don e tim e a s lon g a s "yo u d o no t fee d hazardou s wast

e a t alocatio n i n th

e combustio

n syste mothe r tha n th e norma l flame zone " (§63.1207(c)(2)(iv))
. Veoli adi dno t re-demonstrat

e DR E i n th

e subsequen

t CPT . DRE , an

dth e associate dOPLs , wer

e demonstrate

dduring th

e Januar y 1993 , Novembe

r 1996 , an dDecembe

r 199 5 RCR A Tria l Bums , respectively fo r Unit s 2 , 3 , an

d4 , an doperation s o f

th e incinerators hav e no t significantl y change

dsinc e tha

t test . Thi s tes t (i.e. , th e subsequen

t CPT ) demonstrate

dapplicable emissio n standards an d establishedOPL s a

s require d by th

e HW C MAC T fo r

dioxins/furans , THC , CO , PM , HCI /CI2 , mercury , SVM , andLVM . Th e results o f

thi s ar e use dt o revis e th

e NO C fo r

th e thre e incinerators
. 1. 1 Incinerato r Overvie w Unit s 2 an d3 ar e identica l fixe dheart

h incineratio n system

s wit h primar y an dsecondar

y combustion chamber

s tha t trea t soli dwaste

s a s wel l a s aqueous an

dorganic liquids
. The processes ar

e monitore

d an dcontrolle db

y individua

l distributedcontro l system s (DCS ) capabl

e of continuousl

y monitoring th

e processe s t

o assur e al l operationa

l parameter

s ar e withi n regulator y an dpermi t limit s whil e wast

e i s being fe dt

o th e unit
. I n addition , Unit s 2 an

d3 ar e equippe d wit h aContinuou s Emission s Monitorin g Syste m(CEMS ) tha

t continuousl

y samples th e exhaus t gase s fo r carbo n monoxid

e an doxyge n i n th e stac k ga s exhaus t stream . Uni t 4 i s arotar

y kil n incineratio n syste

mwit h primar y an dsecondar

y combustio

n chamber s tha t treat s soli dwastes a

s wel l a s aqueou s an dorganic hquids
. Th

e proces s i s monitore dan dcontrolledb y aDC S capabl e of continuousl

y monitoring th

e proces s t

o assur e al l operationa

l parameter

s ar e withi n regulator

y an dpermi t limit s whil e wast

e i s being fe dt

o th e unit
. I n addition , thi s incinerato

r i s equippe

dwit h aCEM S tha

t continuousl

y sample s th

e exhaus t gases fo r carbo n monoxid

e an doxyge n i n th e stac k ga s exhaus t stream .

1- 2
VES01767 9

### 1. 2 Tes t Objective s Thi s subsequen

t CP T fo r th e Fina l Replacemen

t Standards o f

th e HW C MAC T wa

s designe d an d conducted t

o demonstrat

e complianc e wit

h th e standards an

d associate

d OPL s o f th e HW C MAC T fo r

existin g incinerators a

t §63.1219 . Th

e CPT :

• Demonstrate

d tha t th e incinerator s mee

t th e applicabl e HW C MAC T emissio n limit s whil e treatin

g hazardou s waste ; an

d

• Re-establishe d operatin g paramete

r limit s (OPLs ) o n ke y operatin g variable s tha

t wil l ensur e tha t th e incinerato

r operates withi n th

e HW C MAC T emissio n Hmit s whil e treating hazardou s waste . Th e tes t progra minclude dfeedin g liqui dan d soli dwast

e material s t

o th e incinerators , samphn

g an d analyzing th

e feedstreams , spikin

g wast e feedstream

s wit h metals an dchlorine , monitorin g certai n proces s parameters , conductin g emission s testing , an

d samplin g o f wast e stream s an d spikin g materials
. Apphcabl e emission s standard

s unde r th e HW C MAC T regulation s demonstrate d durin g th e CP T ar e summarize

d i n Tabl e 1-1 . Tabl e 1-1 . Applicabl e HW C MAC T Emissio n Standard s Emission s Paramete r Limi t Citatio n Dioxins/Furans (TE Q basis) < 0.2 0 ng/dsc m - Unit

s 2 & 3 < 0.4 0 ng/dsc m - Uni t4 4 0 CF R63.1219(a)(l)(i)(A )

40CFR63.1219(a)(l)(i)(B ) Mercur y < 13 0 ug/dsc m 4 0 CF R§ 63.1219(a)(2 ) Semivolatile Metal s (SVM ) (Cadmiu m an d Lead) < 23 0 ug/dsc m 4 0 CF R§ 63.1219(a)(3) Lo w Volatil e Metal s (LVM ) (Arsenic , Berylliu m an

d Chromium) < 9 2 ug/dsc m 4 0 CF R§ 63.1219(a)(4 ) Carbon Monoxid e (CO ) < 10 0 ppmv , dr y 4 0 CF R§ 63.1219(a)(5) © Total Hydrocarbon

s (THC ) < 1 0 ppmv, dr

y 40CFR§63.1219(a)(5)(ii ) Hydroge n Chlorid e & Chlorin e (HCVC1 2 ) < 3 2 ppm v dry , a s Cl " 4 0 CF R§ 63.1219(a)(6 ) Particulat

e Matte r (PM ) < 0.01 3 gr/dsc f 4 0 CF R§ 63.1219(a)(7 ) Destructio

n an d Remova

l Efficienc y (DRE ) > 99.9 9 % 4 0 CF R§ 63.1219(c)(1 ) Note : Al l emission concentration s ar e correcte

d t o 7 % oxygen .



### (
1- 3
VES01768 0

### Th e objective s fo r

th e subsequen

t CP T fo r th e Fina l Replacemen

t Standard s o f th e HW C MAC T fo r

eac h o f th e thre e incinerators wer

e to :

• Demonstrat

e complianc e wit

h stac k ga s emission s les s tha

n o r equa l t o th e followin g limits , correcte

dt o 7 % 0 2 

### :

—Carbo n Monoxide : 10 0 ppmv , dry ;

—Total Hydrocarbons : 1 0 ppmv , dry ;

—Dioxins/Furans : 0.2

0 n g TEQ/dsc mfo r

Unit s 2 and3 , an

d0.40 ng TEQ/dsc mfo r Uni t 4 ;

—Particulat

e Matte r (PM) : 0.01 3 grains/dscf

;

—Mercury : 13 0 |j,g/dscm ;

—Semivolatil e Metal s (SVM ) (C dan dP b combined) : 23 0 \ig /dscm ;

—Lo w Volatilit y Metal s (LVM ) (As , B e an dC r combined) : 9 2 ti g /dscm ; an d

—Hydrogen Chloride/Chlorin e (HC1/C1 2

### ) : 3 2 ppm v a s C T equivalent , dry
. • Complianc e wit

h th e DR E standar

d (99.99 % DRE ) i s demonstrate d using dat

afro m previou s RCR A trial bums
. • Establis h limit s fo r

operatin g parameters . • Conduc t

aContinuou s Monitorin g Syste m(CMS ) performanc e evaluation test . • Conduc t

aRelativ e Accurac y Tes t Audi t (RATA ) fo r

th e C O an d0 2

### Continuou s Emission s Monitorin g System s (CEMS . 1. 3 Tes t Protoco l Summar y A definitio n o f

th e applicable emissio n limit s an dth e resultin g operatin

g paramete

r limit s (OPLs ) ar e give n i n Sectio n 4. 0 ofth e CP T plan s fo r eac h incinerator
. Th

e subsequen

t CP T o f eac h o f th e incinerator s include don e tes t condition , an

dth e test conditio n include don

e mod e o f operation
. On

e se t o f OPL s wa s developedfo r

eac h incinerator
. I n th e firs t par t o f th e tes t fo r eac h incinerator , Veoli ademonstrate d complianc e wit

h th e particulat e matte r standar d o f th e HW C MAC T whil e th

e plan t wa s operate d t o establish th

e maximu mas h feedrat e an dmaximu mcombustion ga

s flowrat e OPL s a s require dby th

e HW C MAC T fo r

th e particulat

e matte r standard
. Complianc e wit h th e standar d fo r carbo n monoxide wa s als o demonstrate

d durin g thi s portio n ofth e test . In th e secon dpar t o f th e tes t fo r eac h incinerator , Veoli ademonstrate d compliance , an d develope dOPLs , wit

h th e HC1/C1 2 

### , dioxins/furans , THC , CO , LVM , SVM , an dmercur y standard s o f th e HW C MAC T whil e th

e plan t wa s operate d t o establis h maximu

mtota l hazardou s wast

e feedrate , maximu

mpumpabl

e hazardou s wast

e feedrate , minimumprimar y combustion chambe

r (PCC ) temperature , minimu msecondar y combustion chambe

r (SCC ) temperature , maximumLVM , SVM , an dH g feedrates , maximumchlorine feedrate , maximu m
1- 4
VES01768 1

### combustio n ga s flowrate , an

dmaximu minlet temperatur

e t o th e baghouse
. As h wa

s fe dt o th e incinerators a

t norma l (o r higher ) level s durin g thi s portio n o f th e test . Complianc e wit

h th e standar d fo r carbon monoxide wa

s als o demonstrate

d during thi s test Sample s o f

th e waste s fe dduring th

e test s wer e sampledever

y 1 5 minute s an

d composite dfo r analysis
. Wast

e fee d sample s wer

e collecte di n coordinatio n wit h th e PM , HCI /CI2 , metals , an

ddioxins/furan s stac

k testing
. Composit

e liqui dwast

e fee dsample s associate dwit h eac h ofth e fou r

samplin g train s wer

e analyze dfo r

ash , tota l chlorine , hea

t content , moisture , density , an

dviscosity
. Th

e composit

e liqui dwast

e fee dsample s collecte dduring th e Metho d29 stac

k sampling fro mth

e secon dpar t o f th e tes t wer e als o analyzedfo r

metal s (arsenic , berylHum, chromium , cadmium , lead , an dmercury) . Al l o f

th e composit

e soli dwast

e fee d samples , containerize dan

dbulk , fro mth

e firs t an dsecon dpart s o f th e tes t wer e analyze dfo r total chlorine , ash , moisture , an

dhea t content. The composit

e containerizedwast

e fee dsamples fo r

Unit s 2,3 , an d4 , an dbul k soli dwast

e feedsamples fro mUni t

4 , collecte ddurin g th

e Metho d29 stack samplin g fro mth e secon dpar t o f th e tes t wer e als o analyze

dfo r metal s (arsenic , beryllium , chromium, cadmium , lead , an dmercury) . Th e incinerator s wer

e operate d fo r 3 0 minute s a

t th e desiredfeedrate s an

doperatin g condition s befor

e samphn g bega n fo r agiven conditio n o f

th e testing t o assur e al l operatin

g parameter s wer e stabiHze da t th e desire dsetting s t

o achiev e stead y state . Spikin g wit

h chromium , lead , mercury , an

dchlorin e wa

s initiate da

t least 3 0 minute s befor

e beginning sampling i n th e secon dpar t o f eac h tes t ru n fo r HC1/C1 2 

### , metals , an

ddioxins/furan s t

o assur e tha t feedrate s o f spiking material s ha

dstabilize dbefor

e samphn g began
. Spikin g o f

th e wast e fee dwit h chromium , lead , mercury , an dchlorin e continuedthroug

h th e completio n o f

th e stac k samplin g fo r dioxins/furans , th

e las t sampling t

o b e completed
. Chlorin e an

dth e metal s lead , chromiu

man dmercur y wer e spike dint

o eac h o f th e three incinerators during , andthroughout, th e secondpar

t o f eac h test run . The LV M categor

y fo r incinerator s include s arsenic , berylliu man dchromium
. Chromiumwa s spike da s asolution o f chromic aci dinto th

e PC C o f th e respective incinerators
. The SV M categor y fo r incinerators include s cadmiu

man dlead
. Lea

dwa s spikeda s soh dlea dnitrat e fe dt o th e incinerator

s i n pre measure d plasti c baggie s a

t regula r interval s wit

h th e containerizedsoli dwaste . Mercur y i s th e onl y hig h volatilit

y meta l o f th e HW C MACT . Mercur

y wa s spike da s amercuric nitrat

e solution , an dwa s fe di n vial s fe dt

o th e incinerato

r a t regula r interval s wit

h th e containerize

dsoh dwaste . Th e concentratio

n o f th e solutio n of

mercuri c nitrat e wa s different

(higher ) fo r Uni t 4 tha n fo r Unit s 2 an d3 . On e via l containing 1 0 mL s o f th e mercuri c nitrat

e solutio n wa

s fe dpe r charg e o f th e containerize

dsoU dwast e t o Unit s 2 an

d3 , an don e via l containin g 20 mL s wer e fe dwit h eac h charg e o f th e containerizedsoh

dwaste s t o Uni t 4 . 4 0 CF R§63.1207(g)(1)(A ) require s feeding norma l (o r higher ) level s o f chlorin e durin g th

e tes t fo r dioxins/furans
. Chlorine wa s spike dth e secon dpar t o f th e tes t an dthroughou

t th e dioxins/furan s testin

g t o provid e aconsisten

t feedrat e o f chlorin e throughou

t th e dioxins/furan s 1- 5
VES01768 2

### sampling
. Th e averag e feedrat e o f chlorine fo r

Uni t 2 fro mDecembe

r 201 2 throug

h May 201 3 wa s 3 5 lb/hr ; th e averag e feedrat e o f chlorin e fo r Uni t 3 fro mDecembe

r 201 2 throug

h May 201 3 wa s 3 1 lb/hr ; an

dth e averag e feedrat e of chlorine fo r

Uni t 4 fro mDecembe

r 201 2 throug

h May 201 3 wa s 8 2 lb/hr
. The spikin g rat e o f chlorine wa

s abou t 20 0 lbs/h r fo r al l thre e incinerators
. Pursuan t t o 4 0 CF R§63.1209(m)(3) , Veoh ai s establishing amaximu mas h feedrat e durin g th e CP T fo r eac h o f th e thre e incinerators , develope

di n association wit

h th e samplin g ofth e stac k ga s fo r particulat e matter . Th

e desire das h feedrat e wa s achieveda

s th e as h fe dt o th e incinerator wit h th e wastes , primarily soh

dwastes . Th

e requiremen

t i n 4 0 CF R§63.120 7 (g) (1)(B ) fo r feedin g norma l (o r higher ) level s o f as h during th

e SV M an dLV M performanc e test

s wa s achieve d b y th e feeding o f

soh d wastes . Th e averag

e solid s feedrat

e o f ash i n th e firs t par t o f th e tes t wa s 503. 0 lbs/h r fo r Uni t 2 , 525. 8 lbs/h

r fo r Uni t 3 , an d4,777. 2 lbs/h

r fo r Uni t 4 . Th e feedin g o f

soli d wastes continued throughou t th e secon dpar t o f th e test a t rate s simila

r t o those i n th

e first par t o f th e test . Th e averag e feedrat e o f as h fo r Uni t 2 fro mDecembe

r 201 2 throug

h May 201 3 wa

s 10 2 lb/hr ; th e averag e feedrat e o f as h fo r Uni t 3 fro mDecembe

r 201 2 throug

h May 201 3 wa

s 10 9 lb/hr ; an dth e averag e feedrat e o f as h fo r Uni t 4 fro mDecembe

r 201 2 throug

h May 201 3 wa

s 94 9 lb/hr
. 4 0 CF R63.1207(g)(l)(i)(C ) require s tha t test s fo r PM , SVM , LVM , mercury , an d dioxins/furan s include anorma l cleaning cycl e o f

th e P M contro l device
. Fo r

eac h o f th e thre e units , th e baghouse i s th

e uni t o f th e ai r pollutio n contro l trai n tha t i s designe

dan doperate d t o contro l particulat

e matter . Testing i n al l thre e run s fo r PM , SVM , LVM , mercury , an d dioxins/furan s wa

s performe dincludin g acleaning cycl e o f th e fabri c filter

(i.e. , baghouse)
. Pe r 4 0 CF R§63.1206(b)(7)(i)(A ) complianc e wit h th e DR E standar

d i s requiredt

o b e demonstrate

d onl y on e tim e an dVeoli ademonstrate

d DR E fo r eac h o f th e thre e incinerators i n RCR A trial bums
. Th e RCR A trial bumfo r Uni t 2 wa s conductedi n Januar

y 1993 , an

dth e RCR A trial bu mfo r

Uni t 3 wa s conducte

di n Novembe

r 1996 . Th e RCR A trial bu mfo r Uni t 4 wa s conducte

d i n Decembe

r 1995 . Veoli adi dno

t re-demonstrat

e DR E i n th

e subsequen

t CP T fo r th e Fina l Replacemen

t Standard s o f th e HW C MAC T becaus e DRE , an dth e associate

dOPLs , wer e demonstrate

d durin g th

e RCR A trial bums , an

doperation s o f

th e incinerators hav

e no t significantl y change

d sinc e those tests . Th e operatin g limit s associatedwit

h th e standar d fo r DR E fo r Uni t 2 are :

• Maximu mTota

l Pumpabl e Wast e Feedrat e 3,10 7 lb/hr ;
• Maximu mTota

l Wast e Feedrat e 4,01 7 lb/hr ;
• Minimu mStac

k Gas Flowrat

e 15,60 5 acfm ;
• Minimu mTemperatur e i n th e Primar y Combustio n Chambe

r 1,658°F ; an

d
• Minimu mTemperatur e i n th e Secondar

y Combustio n Chambe

r 1,848°F .

1- 6

### Th e operating limit s associate dwit h th e standar d fo r DR E fo r Uni t 3 are :

• Maximu mTota

l Pumpable Wast

e Feedrat e 4,04 5 lb/hr ;
• Maximu mTota

l Wast e Feedrat e 5,09 8 lb/hr ;
• Minimu mStac

k Ga s Flowrat

e 16,06 1 acfm ;
• Minimu mTemperatur e i n th e Primar y Combustio n Chambe

r 1,627°F ; an

d
• Minimu mTemperatur e i n th e Secondar

y Combustio n Chambe

r 1,845°F . Th e operating limit s associatedwit h th e standar d fo r DR E fo r Uni t 4 are : Maximu mTota

l Pumpable Wast

e Feedrat e t o th e Kil n Maximu mTota

l Pumpable Wast

e Feedrat e t o th e SC C Maximu mTota

l Wast e Feedrat e t o th e Kil n Maximu mTota

l Wast e Feedrat e t o th e SC C Minimu mStac

k Ga s Flowrat

e 3,31 2 lb/hr ; 1,78 8 lb/hr ; 18,66 7 lb/hr ; 1,78 8 lb/hr ; 44,900 acfm ; • Minimu mTemperatur e i n th e Primar y Combustio n Chambe

r 1,415°F ; an

d
• Minimu mTemperatur e i n th e Secondar

y Combustio n Chambe

r 1,798°F . Th e OPL s associate

dwit h eac h o f th e applicable emissio n standard s (i.e. , PM , HC1/CI2 

### gas , metals , an

ddioxins/furans ) wer

e developedusin g proces s dat atake n durin g th

e collectio n ofth e applicabl e sampling train (i.e. , EP A Metho d5 fo r particulat e matter , Modifie dEP A Metho d26 A fo r

HCyCl 2 

### , EP A Metho d29 fo r metals , an

dSW-84 6 Metho d0023 A fo r dioxins/furans)
. Operating paramete r dat awer e use da s shown i n Tabl e 1-

2 t o develo p HW C MAC T OPLs . TH C i s typicall y monitoredi n CPT s during th e measuremen

t o f DRE . Th e OPL s fo r TH C (i.e. , minimu mcombustion chambe r temperatur

e i n th e primar y combustion chamber

, minimumcombustio n chambe r temperatur

e i n th e secondar

y combustion chamber, maximum flu e ga s flowrate , maximu

mpumpabl

e hazardou s wast

e feedrate , an

dmaximu mtota l wast e feedrate ) ar e th e sam e a s th e OPL s fo r

DR E an ddioxins/furans
. Eve n thoug h DR E wa

s no t demonstrated, TH C wa

s measure d durin g th

e secon dpar t o f eac h tes t ran o f th e CP T fo r eac h unit
.

1- 7Tabl e 1-2 . Dat a Use d t o Establis h OPL s
Demonstrate

d OPL s Emissio n OPL s Develope d During th

e CP T Demonstrate

d OPL s Standar d Unit2 Uni t3 Unit4
Maximu mPumpabl e Wast e Feedrat e D R E 199 3 199 6 199 5 Maximu mPumpabl e Wast e Feedrat e T H C • • / Maximu mPumpabl e Wast e Feedrat e Dioxins/Furan s • • / Maximu mTota l Wast e Feedrat e D R E 199 3 199 6 199 5 Maximu mTota l Wast e Feedrat e T H C • • / Maximu mTota l Wast e Feedrat e Dioxins/Furan s • • V

Maximu mStac k

Ga s Flowrat e S V M V /

Maximu mStac k

Ga s Flowrat e L V M • V • / Maximu mStac k

Ga s Flowrat e P M • V / Maximu mStac k

Ga s Flowrat e HCI/C1 2 • • • Flowrat D R E 199 3 199 6 199 5 Maximu mStac k

Ga s Flowrat e T H C • V Maximu mStac k

Ga s Flowrat e
Dioxins/Furan s • •/ S Minimu mCombustio n Chambe r Temperatur e i n th e PC C D R E 199 3 199 6 199 5 Minimu mCombustio n Chambe r Temperatur e i n th e PC C T H C • • Combustio Temperatur Dioxins/Furan s • S Minimu mCombustio n Chambe r Temperatur e i n th e SC C D R E 199 3 199 6 199 5 Minimu mCombustio n Chambe r Temperatur e i n th e SC C T H C • • V Combustio n Chambe r Temperatur e i n th e SC C Dioxins/Furan s • Maximu mTota l Feedrat e o f LV M (As , Be , Cr ) L V M • • Maximu mPumpabl e Feedrat e o f LV M (As , Be , Cr ) L V M • • < / Maximu mFeedrat e o f SV M (Pb , Cd ) S V M • • • Maximu mFeedrat e o f Mercur y (Hg ) H g Maximu mFeedrat e o f As h P M • Maximu mFeedrat e o f Tota l Chlorine/Chlorid e HC1/C1 2 • • • Maximu mFeedrat e o f Tota l Chlorine/Chlorid e L V M • V • / Feedrat e o f

Tota l Chlorine/Chlorid e S V M • • •/
Maximu mBaghous e Inle t Temperatur e T H C • S Maximu mBaghous e Inle t Temperatur e Dioxins/Furan s • s Maximu mBaghous e Inle t Temperatur e L V M • • Maximu mBaghous e Inle t Temperatur e S V M • • s Minimu mCarbo n Feedrat e Dioxins/Furan s N A N A Minimu mCarbo n Feedrat e H g N A N A • Minimu mSorben t

Feedrat e HC1/C1 2 • • Minimu mCarrie r

Flui dFlowrat e HCVC1 2 • • 199 3 - Operatin g dat afro mth e Januar y 199 3 RCR A Tria l Bur n fo r Uni t 2 . 199 6 - Operatin g dat afro mth e Novembe r 199 6 RCR A Tria l Bu mfo r Uni t 3 . 199 5 - Operatin g dat afro mth e Decembe r 199 5 RCR A Tria l Bu mfo r Uni t 4 .

1- 8
VES01768 5

### 1. 4 CP T Schedul e Th e subsequen

t CP T o f th e thre e incinerators a

t th e Sauge t facilit y bega

n wit h th e performanc e o f

RATAs . Th

e RAT A o f

th e C O an d0 2

### continuou s monitoring system s (CEMS ) o f Uni t 4 wa s performe d on Septembe r 4 , 2013 . The RAT A o f

th e C O an d0 2

### CEM S o f

Uni t 3 wa s performe d on Septembe r 5,2013 , an

dth e RAT A o f

th e C O an d0 2

### CEM S o f

Uni t 2 wa s performedo n Septembe

r 6 , 2013 . Th e CP T wit

h testing fo r

dioxins/furans , THC , CO , PM , HC1/C1 2

### gas , mercury , SVM , an dLV M was conducte

d i n Octobe

r 2013 . The CP T testing fo r eac h o f th e thre e incinerator s wa s observe d b y staf f fro mth e Illinoi s Environmenta

l Protectio n Agenc y (IEPA) . Du e t o th e federa l governmen

t shutdow n i n th e earlie r stage s o f Octobe r 2013 , staf

f fro mEP A Regio n 5 observe d th e CP T testing onl

y o f Uni t 4 , th e las t unit tested
. The subsequen

t CP T o f Uni t 2 wa s begu n Octobe r 8 , 2013 . Ru n 1 o f

th e test wa s successfully completedo n thi s day
. Ru n 2 wa s performe do

n Octobe r 9 , 2013 . Th

e firs t par t o f Run 2 wa s successfull y completed
. Durin g th e secon dpar t o f Ru n 2 , th e TH C monito

r faile dan d drifte dwel l beyond th

e emissio n limi t

o f th e HW C MAC T fo r

THC . I t wa s recognizedtha

t th e TH C monitor

use d to demonstrat

e complianc e wit

h th e HW C MAC T ha

dmalfunctione dbecaus e Veoli amonitor s stac

k gase s fo r THC , an dth e concentration o f

TH C monitore db y Veoli ahad no t increased
. Th

e secon d par t o f Ru n 2 wa s stoppe d fo r thi s reason . The TH C monito r wa s replacedan

d Ru n 3 wa

s performe don Octobe

r 10,2013 . Wit h th

e successfu l completio n o f Ru n 3 , thre e run s fo r P M ha d bee n successfully completed
. Th e thirdru n o f th e secon dpar t o f th e tes t o f Uni t 2 (i.e. , Ru n 4 ) wa

s performe do

n Octobe r 11,2013 . A t

th e completio n o f

Ru n 4 , th e leak

chec k o f th e pitot tube s o f th e dioxins/furan s sampling trai n di dno t mee t th e ful l requirements o f th e applicabl e EP A tes

t method (i.e. , EP A Metho d2) althoug h i t wa s consideredtha

t th e leak

chec k o f th e pito t tube s wa s acceptable
. Becaus e i t

wa s fel t tha t th e results o f

th e dioxins/furan s samphn g trai n wer

e acceptable , thi s m

n o f th e CP T o f Uni t 2 wa s no t re-done
. Personne

l fro m EP A Regio n 5 declared tha t th e dioxins/furan s samphn

g trai n wa

s unacceptabl

e whe n on-sit e th e wee k o f Octobe r 21 , 2013 . Anothe

r m n o f th e secon dpar t ofth e test, fo r

HC1/C1 2 

### , metals , and dioxins/furans , (i.e. , Ru n 5 ) wa s performe do

n Octobe r 30 , 2013 . Th e subsequen

t CP T o f Uni t 3 wa s begu n Octobe r 15 , 2013 . The firs t

par t o f Ru n 1 , fo r PM , wa s successfull y completedon thi s day
. However , th e isokineti c sampling rat

e ofth e dioxins/furan s sampling trai n di dno t mee t methodacceptance criteria , an dth e secon dpar t o f thi s ran, fo r

HC1/C1 2 

### , metals , an

ddioxins/furans , ha

dto b e repeate d a s Ru n 4 . Ru n 2 wa

s performed o n Octobe

r 16, 2013 , an

dRu n 3 wa

s performe do

n Octobe r 17 , 2013 . Th e thir

d successfu l ran o f

th e secon dpar t o f th e tes t o f Uni t 3 (i.e. , Ru n 4 ) wa

s performe don Octobe

r 18 , 2013 .
1- 9

### The subsequen t CP T o f Uni t 4 wa s begu n Octobe r 23,201 3 wit

h th e successfu l completio n o f

Run 1 . Ru n 2 wa

s performed o n Octobe

r 24 , 2013 . Th e glas s nozzl e o f th e P M sampling trai n wa

s chippe d wit

h th e withdrawa

l o f th e sampling prob e fro mth e stac k a t th e completio n o f

th e run . Althoug h th

e sampling train me

t al l acceptance criteria , includin g th e fina l leak-check , th

e secon d mn fo r P M wa s repeated
. Ru n 3 wa

s performe d on Octobe

r 25 , 2013 . Th e thir d(accepted

) ru n fo r P M (i.e. , Ru n 4) wa

s performe d a

t th e conclusio n o f

Ru n 3 fo r PM . Incinerato r operatin g condition s require

d fo r th e P M testing wer

e maintaine d throug

h bot h o f these tes t runs . 1. 5 Summar

y o f Result s Veoli asuccessfully demonstrate d complianc e wit

h al l o f th e applicabl e regulator

y requirement

s o f th e HW C MAC T fo r

Uni t 2 , Uni t 3 , an d Uni t 4 usin g th

e results fro mth

e singl e tes t conditio n o f

eac h unit
. Table 1-

3 summarize s th

e results o f

th e emission s testing o f

Uni t 2 . Tabl e 1- 4 summarize s th

e results o f

th e emission s testin

g o f Uni t 3 , an d Tabl e 1-

5 summarize s th e results o f

th e emission s testing o f

Uni t 4 . Th e tes t fo r eac h unit consiste d o f

thre e reporte d run s fo r eac h paramete

r o f interest
. Th

e ter m"tes t condition " refer s t

o th e su mo f al l th e testin g activitie s designe

d t o demonstrat

e th e operation ofth e wast

e incinerator

unde r particula r operatin g parameter

s (e.g. , developmen

t o f operatin g paramete

r limits ) unde

r th e HW C MACT . Th e ter m"tes t run " refer s t

o th e replicat e testing periods
. A complet e definitio n o f

th e tes t protoco l an

d methodolog

y i s define di n th

e CP T Pla n an d QAPjP
. 1. 6 Repor

t Organizatio n The remainde

r o f thi s repor t present s th e followin g sections :

• Sectio n 2. 0 - Proces s Operations ; • Sectio n 3. 0 - Sampling , Analysis , an d Monitorin g Procedures ;
• Section 4. 0 - Results ; an d
• Section 5. 0 - Qualit

y Assurance/Qualit

y Control
. Th e appendice s provide ra w data, includin g chain-of-custod y forms , samphn

g dat asheet s an d logs , laborator

y reports , proces s data, CM S PE T sheets , spikin g reports , an d sampling equipmen t calibratio n forms
.

1-1 0Tabl e 1-3 . Uni t 2 Complianc e Summar y Uni t2 Paramete

r H W C MAC T Limi t Run l 10-8-1 3 Run 2 10-9-1 3 Run 3 10-10-1 3 Run 5 10-30-1 3 Averag

e Particulat e Matte r

- EP A Metho d 5 0.01 3 gr/dsc f correcte d t o 7 % 0 2 <0.0008 7 <0.0006 8 <0.00058 <0.0007 1 HCl/Cl 2- Modifie dEP A Metho d 26 A 3 2 ppm v dry , a s CI' , correcte d t o 7 % 0 2 <2 9 <1 3 <1 8 <2 0 Metal s - EP A Metho d 2 9 L V M S V M Mercur y 9 2 (ig/dsc mcorrecte d t o 7 % 0 2 23 0 ug/dsc mcorrecte d t o 7 % 0 2 13 0 ug/dsc mcorrecte d t o 7 % 0 2 <2. 8 < U <9 0 <2. 4 <0.7 8 <12 0 <2. 5

<1. 0 <9 5 <2. 6

<0.9 5 <10 0 Dioxins/Furan s - SW-84 6 Metho d 0023 A 0.2 0 ng/dsc mconecte d t o 7 % 0 2 0.0054 3 0.0062 4 0.015 7 0.0091 2 Tota l Hydrocarbon s (THC ) - EP A Metho d 25 A 1 0 ppmv , dr y correcte d t o 7 % 0 2 1. 6 0.1 8 0.4 9 0.7 5 Carbo n Monoxid e (CO) 1 10 0 ppmv , dr y correcte d to 1% 0 2 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.1 5 0.0 5

1 TH C an d C O result s collecte d durin g th e stac k samplin g fo r

dioxins/furans
.

1-1 1
VES01768 8] Tabl e 1-4. Uni t 3 Complianc e Summar y

Paramete r H W C MAC T Limi t Uni t 3 Paramete r H W C MAC T Limi t Run l 10-15-1 3 R u n 2 10-16-1 3 R u n 3 10-17-1 3 R u n 4 10-18-1 3 Averag e Particulat e Matte r

- EP A Metho d 5 0.01 3 gr/dsc f correcte d t o 7 % 0 2 0.0019 4 0.0020 2 0.0020 4 0.0020 0 HC1/C1 2- Modifie dEP A Metho d26 A 3 2 ppm v dry , a s Cl" , correcte d t o 7 % 0 2 <4. 5 <4. 4 <1. 8 <3. 6 Metal s - EP A Metho d 2 9 L V M S V M Mercur y 9 2 ug/dsc mcorrecte d t o 7 % 0 2 23 0 ug/dsc mcorrecte d t o 1% 0 2 13 0 ug/dsc mcorrecte d t o 1% 0 2 <8. 6 <2 0 <5 9 <8. 9

<1 4 <3 9 <1 1

<1 2 <4 6 <9. 4

<1 5 <4 8 Dioxins/Furan s - SW-84 6 Metho d 0023 A 0.2 0 ng/dsc mcorrecte d t o 7 % 0 2 0.0010 3 0.0011 5 0.0013 4 0.0011 8 Tota l Hydrocarbon s (THC ) - EP A Metho d 25 A 1 0 ppmv , dr y correcte d t o 7 % 0 2 0.4 4 0.2 6 0.5 7 0.4 3 Carbo n Monoxid e (CO) 1 10 0 ppmv , dr y correcte d t o 7 % 0 2 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0

1 TH C an d C O result s coUecte d durin g th e stac k samplin g fo r

dioxins/furans
.

1-1 2
VES01768 9Tabl e 1-5 . Uni t 4 Complianc e Summar y Unit4 Paramete

r H W C MAC T Limi t Run l Run 2 Run 3 Ru n 4 Averag e 10-23-1 3 10-24-1

3 10-25-1

3 10-25-1

3 Averag e Particulat e Matte r

- EP A Metho d 5 0.01 3 gr/dsc f correcte d t o 7 % 0 2 0.0026 9 0.0018 3 <0.001 9 <O.002 1 HCl/Cl 2- Modifie dEP A Metho d 26 A 3 2 ppm v dry , a s Cl" , correcte d t o 7 % 0 2 <1 1 <8. 0 <2 3 <1 4 Metal s - EP A Metho d2 9 L V M 9 2 (tg/dsc mcorrecte d t o 7 % 0 2 <1 2 <9. 8 <7. 5 <9. 7 S V M 23 0 ug/dsc mcorrecte d t o 7 % O z <8. 6 <4. 5 <1 0 <7. 8 Mercur y 13 0 ug/dsc mcorrecte d t o 1% 0 2 <7. 1 <8. 1 <1 5 <1 0 Dioxins/Furan s - SW-84 6 Metho d 0023 A 0.4 0 ng/dsc mcorrecte d t o 7 % 0 2 0.13 8 0.13 2 0.13 9 0.13 7 Tota l Hydrocarbon s (THC ) - EP A Metho d 25 A 1 0 ppmv , dr y correcte d t o 7 % 0 2 0.5 1 0.6 0 0.8 5 0.6 5 Carbo n Monoxid e (CO) 1 10 0 ppmv , dr y correcte d to 1% 0 2 0.0 7 0.0 6 0.0 8 0.0 7

1 TH C an d C O result s collecte d durin g th e stac k samplin g fo r

dioxins/furans
.

1-1 3
VES01769 0

## 2.0 Proces s Operation s Thi s sectio

n present s brief description s o f

th e thre e incinerators a

t Veoha' s facilit y i n Sauget , IL , an d proces s an

d feedrat e result s fro mth e CPT s o f th e thre e incinerators
. 2
. 1 Proces s Overvie w Veoli aoperate

s tw o Fixe dHeart

h Dua l Chambere

dincinerators (Units 2 an

d3 ) an don e rotar y kil n incinerato

r (Unit 4) a t th e Sauget , D L facility
. Th

e tw o fixedheart

h unit s ar e rate da t 1 6 millio n Btu/h

r each
. Uni t

3 i s amirror

image o f Uni t 2 . Bot h o f thes e units hav

e thei r ow n wast e handling systems . Unit s 2 an d3 featur e atwo-stag

e combustion process . Ignitio n of wast e materia l take s plac e i n th e primar y flower) combustio

n chambe r (PCC) . A secondar

y (upper ) combustio

n chambe r (SCC ) serves a

s a n "afterburner " fo r

proces s gases . Liqui dwastes , organic an daqueous , an dsoli dwastes ar

e fe dt o th e PCC . Air-atomizin g injector s ar e usedfo r injectio n o f

high-Bt u hquids , low-Btu liquid s an dspecialt y fee d liquids
. Sohds , usually package di n plasti c o

r fiberboard containers , ar

e introduce

d int o th e incinerato

r throug h aPL C controlle dairlock-ra msyste mlocate d a t th e lowe r fron t o f th e PCC . The ai r pollutio n control system

s o f Unit s 2 an

d3 consis t

o f aspra y drye r absorbe r an d fabri c filte r

baghous e modules
. Th

e ai r pollutio n contro l syste

mneutralize s acidi c compounds an d remove s particulat

e matte r fro mth e exhaus t gas . Tw o subsystems , th

e spra y drye r absorbe r an d th e fabri c filter , carr

y ou t th e chemica l neutralizatio n an

dparticulat

e remova l functions , respectively
. A n induced draf

t fan an d stac k provid e th e mechanica

l energ y requiredt

o transpor t th e flue ga s throug h th e interconnectin

g ductwork, t

o it s eventua

l discharge poin

t t o atmosphere
. Th

e onl y differenc e betwee

n Unit s 2 an

d3 i s tha t Uni t 2 i s equippe

dwit h fou r (4 ) baghouse modules , whil e Uni t 3 i s equippe

dwit h thre e (3 ) baghouse modules
. However , eac h incinerato

r i s operate

d identically wit

h only thre

e baghouse module s i n servic e during operation
. A complet

e description o f

Unit s 2 an

d3 i s provide di n th

e CP T Plan
. A proces s flow diagra mfo r Uni t 2 i s presente

d i n Figur e 2-1 , an daproces s flo w diagra

mfo r Uni t 3 i s presente

d i n Figur e 2-2 .

2- 1

### Uni t 4 i s rate d a t 5 0 millio n Btu/h

r an di s equippedwit

h it s ow n tan k far msystem , drum storage , bulk

solid s storag

e an dfee dsystems . Uni t

4 include s arotar

y kil n a s th e PCC , an daSCC . Liquid s ar e fe dt o eithe r th e kil n PC C o

r th e SCC . Bul k

soli dwastes ar

e fe dt o th e kil n throug

h th e ra mfeeder
. Containerizedwastes ar e fe dt o th e kil n throug

h th e ra mfeede r o r th e auxiliar y ra m feeder
. The liqui dwast

e injector s use

d i n th e combustio

n chamber

s ar e air-atomizing injectors , an d ar e used fo r injectio n o f

pumpabl e sludges , aqueous waste s an dorganic liqui dwaste s to th e kil n an dfo r injectio n o f

organic liqui dwast

e t o th e SCC . Th e air pollutio n contro l syste

mconsists o f

atemperin

g chamber

, tw o spra y drye r absorbers , an

dfabri c filte r

baghous e module s wit

h carbo n injection
. Th

e ai r pollutio n contro l syste mneutralize s acidi c compound s an dremove s particulat

e fro mth e exhaus t gas . Tw o subsystems , th

e spra y drye r absorbe r an dth e fabri c filter , carr

y ou t th e chemica l neutralization an d particulat e remova l functions , respectively
. A n induceddraf t fa n an dstac k provid e th e mechanica

l energ y requiredt

o transpor t th e flue ga s throug h th e interconnectin

g ductwork, t

o it s eventua

l discharge poin

t t o atmosphere
. A complet

e description o f

Uni t 4 i s providedi n th

e Comprehensiv

e Performanc e Tes

t Plan
. A proces s flo w diagra

mfo r Uni t 4 i s presente

d i n Figur e 2-3 .

2- 2
VES01769 2Figur e 2 -1 . Uni t 2 Proces s Flo

wDiagra m

TAN K FAR M DIREC T INJECT , HIGH

BT U LIQUID S

SOLID S Mil l

IIII I J f ,T_ T X T COMBUSTIO N AIR BLOWER

I (• *

lOOOOOO M

TAN KFAR M R LO W

8TU ; DIREC TINJEC T, UQUJQ S INCINERATO R LOWER CHAMBE R

LIQUI D CONTAINERS, , GA S CYLINDERS . SPECiAVT Y

FEEQE R
\PRIMAR Y V / FUE L/ 5K0N0AR Y A T BiERC0fOf : STAR S

INCINERATO R UPPE R CHAMBE R

WE T ASt f DUMPSTE R t~~ F I : l ii UM E

PREPARATIO N SYSTE M

SPRA Y DR Y ABSORBE R MAI NSTACK

STAC X M S ANAtfZW S •
BAGHOUSE : 1.0 . FA N

DR Y SCRUBBE R DR Y SCRUBBE R SOUD S { OSS ) SOUD S ( OS S ) EN D DUM P EN D DUM P

cooooc*

- toooo*

- .FUELS/UQW D WAST E FLO W

COMBUSTIO N A1 8 FLO W STAC K OA S FLO W A S H FLO W SOLI D WAST E RO W U M C SLURR Y FLO W

2- 3
VES01769 3Figure 2-2 . Uni t 3 Proces s Flo wDiagra m

TAN K FAR M DIREC T MJEC I I I I I I I 1 I I I T..T.TJT.I
TAN K FAR M „ LO W

BT U DIREC T INJEC T LIQUID S ssmmi INONERATO R LOWE R CHAMBE R

I woisMnr ' STACX U M E

PREPARATIO N SYSTE M MAI NSTACK

SWC KCA S ANALYSIS '
INCINERATO R UPPE R CHAMBE R

WETm DUMPSTE R T f ii ii SPRA Y

PR Y A8S0RBE R

SPECIALT Y FEEDE R FUM EHOO D EMISSIO NCONTRO L SYSTE M PRIMAR Y FUE L 

# > 8AGHOUS E 1.0 . FA N

OR Y SCRUBBE R DR T SCRUBBE R SOLID S ( OS S ) SOUO S ( DS S ) EN D "DUM P EN D DUM P

CLOV EBO X EMISSIO NCONTROL ! SYSTE M -— * - ooccooFuasAwur o WAST E FLO W COMBUSTIO N AI RFLO W STAC K OA S FLO W A S H FLO W SOU D WAST E FLO W U M E SLURR Y FLO W

2-4
VES01769 4Figure 2-3 . Uni t 4 Proces s Flo wDiagra m
TAN K FARM j

SECONDAR Y QCMBUST M CHAMBE R TEMPERIN G SECONDAR Y QCMBUST M CHAMBE R CHAMBE R OR Y SCRUBBER , ,S0l!D S { OS S ) EN D PUM P

SPRA Y DR Y ABSORBE R

PREPARATIO N SYSTE M

SPRA Y DR Y ABSORBE R WET AS H OR Y AS H DUMPSTE R DUMPSTE R OR Y SCRUBBE R S0U0S(0S S ) EN D DUM P OR Y SCRUBBE R iSOUD S ( DS S ) EN D DUM P

BACHOUS E MAI N STACK -

CARBO N INJECTIO N SYSTE M

BAGHOUS EJ— J STAC K CA S AWZER S 1,0 . FA N

OR Y SCRUBBE R jsOUO S ( DS S ) EN O DUM P
fUELS/UOUl O WAST E RO W COMBUSTION AI

RFLO W STAC K GA S no w AS H FLO W SOU D WAST

E FLO W U M E SLURR Y FLO W

2- 5
VES01769 5

### 2. 2 Proces s Operatin g Dat a an d Waste Feedrate s Proces s parameter

s tha t wer e monitore dan

drecorded durin g th

e tes t by Veolia , an

d feedrate s tha

t resul t fro mth e combination o f

wast e feedrate s with th

e respective wast

e fee d analyses , ar

e presente d i n thi s section
. Proces s dat arecorde d b y Veoli aever

y 1 5 seconds ar

e use d t o creat e one-minut

e average s (OMAs) . The DC S calculate s hourly rollin g averages (HRAs ) fo r applicabl e parameter

s using th e OM A fro mth

e firs t minut e an d th e OMA s fro mpreviou s 5 9 minute s o f

data
. The ra

w dat afro mVeolia' s DC S ar

e provide di n Appendi x C . 2.2. 1 Uni t 2 Proces s dat

aan d wast e an dparamete

r feedrate s hav

e bee n determine

d an dar e presente d fo r th e tim e period s ove

r th e collectio n o f

th e stac k ga s sampling train s fo r

particulat e matte r (EP A Metho d5) , HC1/C1 2

### (Modifie dEP A Metho d26A) , metal s (EP A Metho d29) , an ddioxins/furan s (SW-84 6 Metho d0023A ) an dTH C (EP A Metho d25A) . Table 2- 1 present

s proces s dat

asummarie s an

d wast e feedrate s durin g th

e particulat

e matte r (PM ) stac k ga s samplin g o f

th e firs t par t o f eac h test m n fo r Uni t 2 . Table 2- 2 present

s proces s dat

asummarie s an

dwast e feedrate s durin g th

e HC1/C1 2

### stac

k ga s sampling o

f th e secon d par t o f eac h test run fo r Uni t 2 . Table 2- 3 present

s proces s dat

asummarie s an

d wast e feedrate s durin g th

e metal s stac

k gas samplin g o f th e secon d par t o f eac h tes t run fo r Uni t 2 . Table 2-4 present

s proces s dat

asummarie s an

d wast e feedrate s during th

e dioxins/furan s an d TH C stac

k ga s sampling an

dmonitorin g o f

th e secon d par t o f eac h tes t ru n fo r Uni t 2 . 2.2.2 Uni t 3 Tabl e 2- 5 present

s proces s dat

asummarie s an

dwast e feedrate s during th

e P M stac k ga s samplin g o f th e firs t par t o f eac h tes t ran fo r Uni t 3 . Table 2- 6 present

s proces s dat

asummarie s an

dwast e feedrate s durin g th

e HCI /CI2 stac k ga s samplin g o f th e secon d par t o f eac h test ran fo r Uni t 3 . Tabl e 2- 7 present s proces s dat

asummarie s an

dwast e feedrate s durin g th

e metal s stac

k gas samplin g o f th e secon d par t o f eac h tes t run fo r Uni t 3 . Tabl e 2- 8 present

s proces s dat

asummarie s an

d wast e feedrate s durin g th

e dioxins/furan s an d TH C stac

k ga s sampling an

dmonitorin g ofth e secon d par t o f eac h tes t run fo r Uni t 3 .
2- 6
VES01769 6

### 2.2. 3 Uni t 4 Tabl e 2- 9 present

s proces s dat

asummarie s an

dwast e feedrate s durin g th

e P M stac k ga s sampling o f

th e firs t par t o f eac h tes t m n fo r Uni t 4 . Tabl e 2-1 0 present

s proces s dat

asummarie s andwast

e feedrate s durin g th

e HCVCI 2 

### stack ga s sampling o f

th e secon dpar t o f eac h tes t run fo r Uni t 4 , Tabl e 2-1 1 present

s proces s dat

asummarie s andwast

e feedrate s durin g th

e metal s stac

k ga s sampling o f

th e secon dpar t o f eac h tes t ran fo r Uni t 4 . Tabl e 2-1 2 present

s proces s dat

asummarie s andwast

e feedrate s durin g th

e dioxins/furan s an dTH C stac

k ga s samplin g an dmonitorin g o f

th e secon dpar t o f eac h tes t ru n fo r Uni t 4 . 2.3 Spikin g o

f Metal s an d Chlorin e Durin g th e tes t o f eac h incinerator , th

e metal s chromium , lead , an dmercur y wer e spike dinto th e incinerator
. The spikin g wa s performe db y Veolia
. Detail s concerning th e spikin g o f

metal s an d chlorine ar

e presente d i n Appendi x B . Th e spikin g rate s o f

chlorin e durin g th

e HCI /CI 2 stac k sampling o f

th e secon dpar t o f each ran ar e presente d i n Table 2-1 3 fo r

Uni t 2 , Tabl e 2-1 4 fo r

Uni t 3 , an d2-1 5 fo r Uni t 4 . Th e spikin g rate s o f

chromium , lead , mercury , an dchlorine durin g th

e metal s stac

k samphn g o f th e secon dpar t o f eac h ran ar e presente

d i n Tabl e 2-1 6 fo r

Uni t 2 , Tabl e 2-1 7 fo r

Uni t 3 , an d 2-1 8 fo r

Uni t 4 . Th e spikin g solution s o f

chromiu m(chromi c acid) an

dmercur y (mercuri c nitrate) wer

e sample da t th e beginning , a

t por t change , an

da t th e en do f th e EP A Metho d2 9 stac

k sampling fo r metal s o f eac h ran, an deac h o f these sample s wer

e analyzedfo r

chromiumor

mercury , respectively
. Th

e analytica

l result s fo r

chromi c aci dan

dmercuri c nitrat

e solution s ar

e presente

d i n Table s 2-1 9 an

d2-2 0 fo r Uni t 2 , Table s 2-2 1 an

d2-2 2 fo r

Uni t 3 , an dTable s 2-2 3 an

d2-2 4 fo r Uni t 4 .

2- 7 VES01769 7) Tabl e 2-1 . Uni t 2 - Summar y o f Proces s Data 1 an d Feedrate s Durin g th e EP A Metho d 5 Stac k Samplin g fo r P M Operatin g Paramete r Unit s Basi s Run l 10-8-1 3 11:5 0 -13:0 0 Ru n 2 10-9-1 3 09:45-10:5 3 Ru n 3 10-10-1 3 09:1 5 -10:2 3 Averag e Operatin g Paramete r Unit s Basi s Ma x Av g Mi n Ma x Av g M i n Ma x Av g M i n Ma x Av g M i n Stac k Ga s Flowrat e ACF M HR A 15,01 5 14,95 5 14,87 6 15,52 9 15,43 0 15,32 4 15,69 0 15,37 4 15,24 0 15,41 2 15,25 3 15,14 7 Low-Bt u Liqui dWaste Feedrat e lb/hr OM A 1,947. 7 1,277. 2 899. 3 1,948. 6 1,353. 3 749. 5 2850. 8 1288. 3 299. 8 2,249. 0 1,306. 3 649. 5 High-Bt u Liqui dWast

e Feedrat e lb/hr OM A 1,009. 9 1,000. 2 982. 6 1,142. 2 997. 7 792. 3 1008. 4 998. 5 985. 5 1,053. 5 998. 8 920. 1 Specialt y Liqui dWast

e Feedrat e lb/h r OM A 351. 7 270. 8 190. 5 424. 9 256. 5 131. 9 468. 9 296. 7 161. 2 415. 1 274. 6 161. 2 Containerize dSolid s Wast e Feedrat e lb/h

r OM A 734. 9 738. 4 746. 0 739. 8 As h Feedrat e lb/h r OM A 501. 6 513. 2 494. 2 503. 0 PC C Temperatur

e ° F OM A 1,73 5 1,708 1,64 0 1,73 3 1,69 1 1.65 0 1,75 9 1,69 8 1,63 8 1,742 1,69 9 1,64 3 SC C Temperatur

e ° F OM A 1,89 4 1,88

0 1,86

7 1,89 3 1,880 1,86 9 1,90

0 1,88 2 1,87 0 1,89 6 1,88 1 1,86 9 CO , Correcte d t

o 7 % 0 2 ppmv d OM A 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 O.O O Baghous e Inlet

Temperature 2 ° F OM A 44 0 42 0 39 6 444 42 0 40 0 43 8 42 1 39 3 44 1 42 0 39 6

' Proces s dataar

e th e average s fo r

th e duratio n o f

th e emission s samplin g ru n fo r particulat

e matte r i n stack
.
2Measure d a s th

e SD A (Spra

y Dryer/Absorber) Outlet Temperature . Note : Value s i n bol duse d t o develo p OPL .



### 2- 8
VES01769 8I Tabl e 2-2 . Uni t 2 - Summar y o f Proces s Data 1 an d Feedrate s Durin g th e Modifie d EP A Metho d 26 A Stac k Samplin g fo r HCI/CI 2 Operatin g Paramete r Unit s Basi s Run l 10-8-1 3 15:4 0 -16:4 0 Ru n 3 10-10-1 3

, 12:3 0 -13:3 0 Ru n 5 10-30-1 3 12:4 5 -13:4 5 Averag e Operatin g Paramete r Unit s Basi s Ma x M i n Ma x Av g Mi n Ma x Av g Mi n Ma x Av g M i n Stac k Ga s Flowrat e acf m HR A 15,41 0 15,27 8 15,14 2 15,85 4 15,65 2 15,31 0 15,40 7 15,22 5 15,03 8 15,55 7 15.38 5 15,16 3 Low-Bt u Liqui dWast

e Feedrat e lb/h r OM A 2,546. 4 1,422. 1 299. 8 2,246. 8 1,500. 9 899. 6 2,321. 8 1,451. 9 374. 9 2371. 6 1458. 3 524. 8 High-Bt u Liqui dWast

e Feedrat e lb/h

r OM A 1,424. 2 1,370. 8 1,191. 0 1,129. 5 1,098. 7 1,051. 6 1,226. 6 1,200. 0 1,163. 7 1260. 1 1223. 1 1135. 5 Specialt y Liqui dWast

e Feedrat e lb/hr OM A 586. 1 485. 9 410. 3 527. 5 398. 2 307. 7 615. 4 440. 8 263. 7 576. 3 441. 6 327. 2 Containerize d Solid s Wast e Feedrate 2 lb/hr 884. 8 902. 0 880. 4 889. 0 Tota l Chlorin e Feedrat e lb/h r 208. 0 207. 5 202. 8 206. 1 Sorben t Feedrat e lb/l b Ch HR A 2.3 2 2.1 8 2.2 1 2.24 Carrie r Flui dFlowrat e gal/lb Cl 2 HR A 1.9 3 1.8 5 1.9 2 1.9 0 PC C Temperatur

e « p OM A 1,77 2 1,70 7 1,64 8 1,81 3 1,72 1 1,63 1 1,75 3 1,70 3 1,60

8 1,77 9 1,71 0 1,62 9 SC C Temperatur

e ° F OM A 1,95 8 1,89 1 1,866 1,91 0 1,87 8 1,86 5 1,89

7 1,882 1,87 2 1,92 2 1,88

4 1,86 8 CO , Correcte d to 7 % O 2 ppmv d OM A 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.6 6 0.0 8 0.0 0 0.2 2 0.0 3 O.O O Baghous e Inlet

Temperature 3 ° F OM A 44 7 42 1 39 2 43 9 41 8 39 9 43 9 41 9 39 4 44 1 42 0 39 5

1 Proces s dataar

e th e average s fo r

th e duratio n o f

th e emission s samplin g run fo r HCI/O 2 i n stack
.
2Containerize d Wast

e Feedrat e include s th

e spike s o f

hexachloroethane , lea d nitrate , and mercuri c nitrat e solution
.
3 Measure d a

s th e SD A (Spra

y Dryer/Absorber ) Outlet Temperature . Note : Value s i n bol duse d t o develo p OPL .



### 2- 9
VES01769 9Tabl e 2-3 . Uni t 2 - Summar y o f Proces s Data 1 an d Feedrate s Durin g th e EP A Metho d 2 9 Stac k Samplin g fo r Metal s Operatin g Paramete r Unit s Basi s Run l 10-S-1 3 15:40-18:4 3 Ru n 3 10-10-1 3 12:30-15:1 0 Ru n 5 10-30-1 3 12:4 5 -15:3 2 Averag e Operatin g Paramete r Unit s Basi s Ma x Av g Mi n Ma x Av g Mi n Ma x Av g M i n Ma x Av g M i n Stac k Ga s Flowrat e acf m HR A 15,60 2 15,37 5 14,94 6 15,85 4 15,48 7 15,12 6 15,63 6 15,43 8 15,03 8 15,69 7 15,43 3 15,03 7 Low-Bt u Liqui dWast

e Feedrat e lb/h

r OM A 2,546. 4 1,474. 6 299. 8 2,246. 8 1,513. 3 899. 6 2,547. 3 1,396. 5 0. 9 2,446. 8 1,461. 5 400. 1 High-Bt u Liqui dWast

e Feedrat e Ib/h

r OM A 1,424. 2 1,289. 1 1,191. 0 1,129. 5 1,098. 9 1,051. 6 1,226. 6 1,164. 6 973. 4 1,260. 1 1,184. 2 1,072. 0 Specialty Liqui dWast

e Feedrat e lb/h

r OM A 615. 4 432. 6 0. 0 586. 1 425. 4 307. 7 732. 6 445. 3 234. 4 644. 7 434. 4 180. 7 Containerize dSolid s Wast e Feedrate 2 lb/h

r 895. 0 883. 1 891. 2 889. 8 S V M Feedrat e lb/h r 61. 9 61. 7 62. 0 61. 9 L V M Feedrate-Tota l lb/h r 45. 8 47. 3 45. 9 46. 3 L V M Feedrat e - Pumpabl e lb/h r 45. 9 47. 3 45. 9 46. 3 Mercur y Feedrat e lb/h r 0.0020 5 0.0020 6 0.00224 0.0021 2 Tota l Chlorin e Feedrat e lb/h r 209. 6 203. 6 205. 1 206. 1 Baghous e Inle t

Temperature 3 ° F OM A 44 7 42 0 39 2 43 9 41 9 39 9 43 9 41 9 39 4 44 1 42 0 39 5 PC C Temperatur

e " F OM A 1,77 2 1,70 1 1,62 2 1,82 1 1,70 8 1,60 7 1,79 8 1,70

5 1,60

8 1,79

7 1,70

5 1,61 2 SC C Temperatur

e ° F OM A 1,95 8 1,87 5 1,71 4 1,96 2 1,88 6 1,86

5 1,89

7 1,88 2 1,857 1,93 9 1,88 1 1,81 2 CO , Correcte d t

o 7 % O j ppmv d OM A 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 1.2 5 0.1 3 0.0 0 0.4 2 0.04 0.0 0

1 Proces s dataar

e th e average s fo r

th e duratio n o f

th e emission s samplin g ru n fo r Metal s i n stack
.
2Containerize dWast

e Feedrat e include s the spike s o f

hexachloroethane , lea dnitrate , an d mercuri c nitrat e solution
.
3 Measure da

s th e SD A (Spra

y Dryer/Absorber ) Outle t Temperature . Note : Value s i n bol dused t o develop OPL .



### 2-1 0 VES01770 0Tabl e 2-4 . Uni t 2 - Summar y o f Proces s Data 1 an d Feedrate s Durin g th e SW-84

6 Metho d 0023

A Stac k Samplin g fo r Dioxins/Furan s Operatin g Paramete r Unit s Basi s Run l 10-8-1 3 15:40-18:5 5 Ru n 3 10-10-1 3 12:30-15:4 0 Ru n 5 Octobe r 30,201 3 12:45-16:0 2 Averag e Operatin g Paramete r Unit s Basi s Ma x Av g Mi n Ma x Av g Mi n Ma x Av g M i n Ma x Av g M i n Stac k Ga s Flowrat e ACF M HR A 15,60 2 15,345 14,86 2 15,85 4 15,46 2 15,12 6 15,63 6 15,41 6 15,03 8 15,69 7 15,40 8 15,00 9 Low-Bt u Liqui dWast

e Feedrat e lb/h r OM A 2546. 4 1470. 7 299. 8 2,246. 8 1,510. 2 899. 6 2547 138 3 1 2,446. 8 1,454. 7 400. 1 High-Bt u Liqui dWast

e Feedrat e lb/h r OM A 1424. 2 1286. 7 1191. 0 1,129. 5 1,099. 2 1,051. 6 122 7 1140 97 3 1,260. 1 1,175. 2 1,072. 0 Specialty Liqui dWast

e Feedrat e lb/h r OM A 615. 4 429. 8 0. 0 586. 1 425. 5 307. 7 73 3 44 5 23 4 644. 7 433. 6 180. 7 Containerize dSolid s Wast e Feedrate 2 lb/h i 897. 9 867. 4 874. 1 879. 8 Tota l Wast e Feedrate 3 lb/h r HR A 4,473. 4 4,317. 4 4,060. 4 4,369. 4 4,110. 4 2,944. 5 4,446. 7 4,119. 3 3,707. 4 4,429. 8 4,182. 4 3,570. 8 Tota l Pumpabl e Wast e Feedrate 3 lb/h r HR A 3,564. 8 3,429. 5 3,241. 7 3,469. 0 3,276. 5 2,507. 5 3.519. 5 3,267. 4 2,930. 6 3,517. 8 3,324. 5 2,893. 3 P C C Temperatur e ° F OM A 1,77 2 1,70 1 1,62 2 1,82 1 1,70

7 1,59

4 1,79 8 1,70 1 1,608 1,79 7 1,70

3 1,60 8 SC C Temperatur e ° F OM A 1,95 8 1,875 1,71 4 1,96 2 1,88

4 1,86

5 1,899 1,88 3 1,857 1,94 0 1,88 1 1,81 2 Baghous e Inle t

Temperature 4 ° F OM A 44 7 42 0 39 2 43 9 41 9 39 9 43 9 41 9 39 4 44 1 42 0 39 5 CO , Correcte d to 7 % 0 2 ppmv d OM A 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 1.6 2 0.1 5 0.0 0 0.5 4 0.0 5 0.0 0

1 Proces s dataar

e th e average s fo r

the duratio n o f

th e emission s samplin g ru n fo r Dioxins/Furan s i n stack
.
2Containerize dWast

e Feedrat e include s th

e spike s o f

hexachloroethane , lead nitrate , and mercuri c nitrat e solution
.
3 Tota l Waste Feedrat

e an d Tota l Pumpabl e Wast e Feedrate , maximum , average , an d minimum , include s th

e averag e chromi c aci dsolutio n feedrate
.
4 Measure d a

s th e SD A (Spra

y Dryer/Absorber ) Outle t Temperature . Note : Value s i n bol duse d t o develop OPL .



### 2-1 1 VES01770 1Tabl e 2-5 . Uni t 3 - Summar y o f Proces s Data 1 an d Feedrate s Durin g th e EP A Metho d 5 Stac k Samplin g fo r P M
Operatin g Paramete r Unit s Basi s Run l 10-15-1 3 13:1 6 -14:2 5 Ru n 2 10-16-1 3 11:1 5 -12:2 5 Ru n 3 10-17-1 3 09:5 0 -10:5 7 Averag e Operatin g Paramete r Unit s Basi s Ma x Av g M i n Ma x Av g M i n Ma x Av g M i n Ma x Av g M i n Stac k Ga s Flowrat e ACF M HR A 15,24 5 15,16 7 15,14 9 15,40

7 15,27 9 15,17 3 15,27 8 15,06 4 14,90 1 15,31 0 15,17 0 15,07 4 Low-Bt u Liqui dWast

e Feedrat e Ib/h

r OM A 1,636. 3 1,292. 9 890. 5 1,635. 2 955. 4 368. 1 2,007. 3 1,357. 6 367. 9 1,759. 6 1,202. 0 542. 2 High-Bt u Liqui dWast

e Feedrat e lb/h r OM A 861. 1 847. 9 833. 4 887. 5 818. 2 742. 2 933. 0 875. 3 810. 1 893. 8 847. 1 795. 2 Specialt y Liqui dWast

e Feedrat e lb/hr OM A 395. 6 307. 9 131. 9 381. 0 269. 1 190. 5 791. 2 457. 4 263. 7 522. 6 344. 8 195. 4 Containerize dSolid s Wast e Feedrat e lb/h r OM A 738. 3 742. 1 720. 7 733. 7 As h Feedrat e lb/h r OM A 499. 9 510. 9 566. 5 525. 8 PC C Temperatur

e ° F OM A 1,76 6 1,70

7 1,65 0 1,726 1,70 4 1,68

4 1,74

2 1,70

4 1,61 4 1,74

4 1,70

5 1,64

9 SC C Temperatur

e ° F OM A 1,899 1,89 0 1,88 3 1,895 1,88 5 1,87 8 1.90

2 1,885 1,86

3 1,899 1,88

7 1,87 5 CO , Correcte d t

o 1% Ch ppmv d OM A 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 Baghous e Inlet

Temperature 2 ° F OM A 43 1 42 0 40 7 43 1 42 1 40 1 43 4 42 0 40 2 43 2 42 0 40 3

' Proces s dataar

e th e average s fo r

th e duratio n o f

th e emission s samplin g run fo r particulat

e matte r i n stack
.
2Measure d a

s the SD A (Spra

y Dryer/Absorber ) Outlet Temperatur

e Note : Value s i n bol duse d t o develop OP L



### 2-1 2 VES01770 2

### ) Tabl e 2-6 . Uni t 3 - Summar y o f Proces s Data 1 an d Feedrate s Durin g th e Modifie d EP A Metho d 26A Stac k Samplin g fo r HC1/CI 2 Operatin g Paramete r Unit s Basi s Ru n 2 10-16-1 3 14:0 0 -15:0 0 Ru n 3 10-17-1 3 12:3 0 -13:3 3 Ru n 4 10-18-1 3 09:3 5 -10:3 5 Averag e Operatin g Paramete r Unit s Basi s Ma x Av g M i n Ma x Av g Mi n Ma x . Ayg. . Mi n Ma x Av g Mi n Stac k Ga s Flowrat e acf m HR A 15,54

7 15,39 5 15,08 8 15,36 0 15,20 4 14,840 15,22 8 15,19 3 15,11 6 15,37 8 15,26 4 15,01 5 Low-Bt u Liqui dWast

e Feedrat e lb/h r OM A 2,530. 5 1,783. 5 442. 9 2,008. 4 1,563. 4 0. 0 2,231. 4 1,725. 3 1,261. 8 2,256. 8 1,690. 7 568. 2 High-Bt u Liqui dWaste Feedrat e lb/h r OM A 1,053. 0 977. 2 926. 8 1,212. 3 1,151. 9 1,039. 1 1,263. 1 1,163. 5 1,003. 3 1,176. 1 1,097. 6 989. 7 Specialt y Liqui dWast

e Feedrat e lb/h r OM A 380. 9 177. 5 87. 9 556. 8 407. 7 322. 3 410. 3 248. 8 146. 5 449. 3 278. 0 185. 6 Containerize d Solid s Waste Feedrate 2 lb/hr 904. 4 893. 8 861. 3 886. 5 Tota l Chlorin e Feedrat e lb/t o 207. 0 206. 0 201. 0 204. 7 Sorben t Feedrat e lb/l b Cl 2 HR A 2.1 3 1.9 9 2.1 3 2.0 9 Carrie r Flui dFlowrat e gal/l b Cl 2 HR A 1.86 1.7 8 1.8 8 1.8 4 PC C Temperatur

e » F OM A 1,746 1,70 9 1,67 5 1,77

0 1,71 5 1,69 1 1,74 3 1,71 9 1,69

4 1,75 3 1,71 4 1,68 6 SC C Temperatur

e °F OM A 1,90 9 1,88

7 1,86

7 1.93 1 1,88

4 1,84

2 1,92

3 1,88 1 1,86

4 1,92 1 1,88

4 1,85 8 CO , Correcte d t

o 7 % 0 2 ppmv d OM A 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 Baghous e Inlet

Temperature 3 °F OM A 43 0 42 0 39 5 43 3 42 0 38 0 42 9 41 5 38 5 43 1 41 8 38 6

1 Proces s dat

aar e th e average s fo r

th e duratio n o f

th e emission s samplin g ru n fo r HCI /CI2 i n stack
.
2Containerize d Wast

e Feedrat e include s th

e spike s o

f hexachloroethane , lead nitrate , and mercuri c nitrat e solution
.
3 Measure d a

s th e SD A (Spra

y Dryer/Absorber ) Outlet Temperature . Note : Value s i n bol duse d to develop OPL .



### 2-1 3 VES01770 3Tabl e 2-7 . Uni t 3 - Summar y o f Proces s Data 1 an d Feedrate s Durin g th e EP A Metho d 29 Stac k Samplin g fo r Metal s Operatin g Paramete r Unit s Basi s Ru n 2 10-16-1 3 14:0 0 -16:5 0 Ru n 3

10-17-1 3 12:3 0 -15:2 5 Ru n 4

10 -18 -1 3 09:35-12:2

0 Averag e Operatin g Paramete r Unit s Basi s Ma x Av g Mi n Ma x Av g Mi n Ma x Av g Mi n Ma x Av g M i n Stac k Ga s Flowrat e acf m HR A 15,547 15,27 4 15,08 8 15,42 9 15,23 0 14,840 15,27 7 15,13 3 14,98 3 15,41 7 15,21 2 14 ,97 0 Low-Bt u Liqui dWast

e Feedrat e lb/h r OM A 2,531. 2 1,787. 6 442. 9 2,157. 8 1,685. 3 0. 0 2,231. 4 1,707. 4 1,261. 8 2,306. 8 1,726. 8 568. 2 High-Btu Liqui dWast

e Feedrat e lb/h

r OM A 1,114. 5 1,043. 9 926. 8 1,212. 3 1,166. 5 1,039. 1 1,263. 1 1,197. 7 1,001. 3 1.196. 6 1,136. 0 989. 1 Specialt y Liqui dWast

e Feedrat e lb/h

r OM A 410. 3 202. 9 0. 0 556. 8 350. 0 0. 0 410. 3 244. 8 146. 5 459. 1 265. 9 48. 8 Containerize dSolid s Wast e Feedrate 2 lb/hr 890. 9 888. 0 873. 6 884. 2 S V M Feedrat e lb/hr 62. 1 62. 5 62. 2 62. 3 L V M Feedrat e - Tota l lb/hr 46. 3 46. 1 45. 7 46. 1 L V M Feedrat e - Pumpabl e Ib/h r 46, 3 46. 1 45. 7 46. 0 Mercur y Feedrat e lb/h r 0.0022 1 0.0021 4 0.0022 7 0.0022 1 Tota l Chlorin e Feedrat e lb/hr 204. 2 204. 6 203. 7 204. 2 Baghous e Inle t

Temperature 3 " F OM A 43 0 41 9 39 5 43 3 42 0 38 0 43 6 42 1 38 5 43 3 42 0 38 6 PC C Temperatur

e ° F OM A 1,75 2 1,71 0 1,67 5 1,77 0 1,70 7 1,65 7 1,743 1,708 1,61 0 1,75 5 1,708 1,64 7 SC C Temperatur

e ° F OM A 1,90 9 1,885 1,86

7 1,93 1 1,885 1,84 2 1,923 1,88 6 1,86 4 1,92 1 1,885 1,85 8 CO , Correcte d t

o 7 % 0 2 ppmvd OM A 0.0 0 0.0

0 0.0

0 0 .00 o.o

o 0.0

0 0.0

0 0.0

0 0.0

0 0.0

0 0.0

0 0.0

0

1 Proces s dat

aar e th e average s fo r

th e duratio n o f

the emission s samplin g ru n fo r Metal s i n stack
.
2Containerize dWast

e Feedrat e include s th

e spike s o f

hexachloroethane , leadnitrate , an d mercuri c nitrat

e solution
.
' Measure da

s th e SD A (Spra

y Dryer/Absorber ) Outle t Temperature . Note : Value s i n bol duse d to develo p OPL .



### 2-1 4 VES01770 4) Tabl e 2-8 . Uni t 3 - Summar y o f Proces s Data 1 an d Feedrate s Durin g th e SW-84

6 Metho d 0023

A Stac k Samplin g fo r Dioxins/Furan s Operatin g Paramete

r Unit

s Basi s Ru

n 2 10-161-1 3 14:00-17:2

0 Ru n 3 10-17-1 3 12:3 0 -15:5 5 Ru n 4 10-18-1 3 09:3 5 -12:50 Averag e Operatin g Paramete

r Unit

s Basi s Max Avg Mi n Max Av g Mi n Ma x Av g Mi n Max Av g Mi n Stac k Ga s Flowrat

e ACF M H R A 15,54 7 15,24 8 15,08 8 15,42 9 15,21 9 14,840 15,27 7 15,12 5 14,98 3 15,41 7 15,19 7 14,97 0 Low-Bt u Liqui dWast

e Feedrat e lb/h r O M A 2,531. 2 1,806. 5 442. 9 2,157. 8 1,688. 0 0. 0 2,231. 4 1,718. 8 1,261. 8 2,306. 8 1,737. 7 568. 2 High-Bt u Liqui dWast

e Feedrat e lb/h r O M A 1,114. 5 1,052. 3 926. 8 1,212. 3 1,167. 4 1,039. 1 1,263. 1 1,188. 4 805. 7 1,196. 6 1,136. 0 923. 9 Specialty Liqui dWast

e Feedrat e lb/h r O M A 410. 3 199. 6 0. 0 556. 8 340. 4 0. 0 410. 3 246. 2 146. 5 459. 1 262. 1 48. 8 Containerize dSolid s Wast e Feedrate 2 Ib/h

r 887. 2 870. 5 872. 5 876. 7 Total Wast

e Feedrate 3 Ib/h r H R A 4,288. 0 4,057. 1 2,491. 4 4,503. 5 4,250. 4 2,904.3 4,437. 3 4,233. 2 3,734. 8 4,409. 6 4,180. 2 3,043. 5 Total Pumpabl

e Wast e Feedrate 3 lb/h r HR A 3,412. 8 3,209. 1 2,055. 4 3,613. 3 3,410. 5 2,467. 1 3,556. 0 3,393. 0 3,238. 5 3,527. 4 3,337. 5 2,587. 0 PC C Temperatur

e ° F O M A 1,75 2 1,70 9 1,67

5 1,770 1,70

7 1,657 1,75 7 1,71 2 1,61 0 1,76 0 1,70

9 1.64

7 SC C Temperatur

e ° F O M A 1,90 9 1,885 1,86

7 1,93 1 1,885 1,84 2 1,923 1,88

4 1,86

4 1,92 1 1,88

5 1,85 8 Baghous e Inle tTemperature 4 ° F OM A 43 0 41 9 39 5 43 3 42 1 38 0 43 6 42 0 38 5 43 3 42 0 38 6 CO , Correcte d t

o 7 % O j ppmv d O M A 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0

1 Proces s dataar

e th e average s fo r

the duratio n o f

th e emission s samplin g run fo r Dioxins/Furan s i n stack
.
2Containerize dWast

e Feedrat e include s th

e spike s o f

hexachloroethane , lead nitrate , an d mercuri c nitrat

e solution
.
3 Tota l Wast

e Feedrat e an d Tota l Pumpabl e Wast e Feedrate , maximum , average , an d minimum , include s the averag e chromi c aci dsolutio n feedrate
.
4 Measure da

s th e SD A (Spra

y Dryer/Absorber ) Outle t Temperature . Note : Value s i n bol duse d to develop OPL .



### 2-1 5 VES01770 5Tabl e 2-9 . Uni t 4 - Summar y o f Proces s Data 1 an d Feedrate s Durin g th e EP A Metho d 5 Stac k Samplin g fo r P M
Operating Paramete

r Unit

s Basi

s Run l

10-23-1 3 09:30-10:4

2 Ru n 3

10-25-1 3 09:3 5 -10:4 0 Ru n 4

10-25-1 3 10:5 0 -11:5 5 Averag e Operating Paramete

r Unit

s Basi

s Ma x Avg Mi n Ma x Av g Mi n Ma x Av g Mi n Ma x Av g Mi n Stac k Ga s Flowrat

e ACF M HR A 37,75 5 37,63 2 37,33 3 37,99 7 37,824 37,47 9 37,64 7 36,94 9 36,51 8 37,80 0 37,46 8 37,11 0 Low-Bt u Liqui dWast

e t o Kil n Feedrat

e lb/h r OM A 2,080. 6 1,899. 6 1,646. 9 2,180. 2 1,901. 0 1,730. 0 1,957. 9 1,896. 8 1,807. 7 2,072. 9 1,899. 2 1,728. 2 High-Bt u Liqui dWast

e to Kil n Feedrat

e lb/h

r OM A 1,124. 8 1,101. 4 1,081. 3 1,403. 2 1,098 . 1 1,010. 0 1 ,200. 5 1,108. 9 996. 8 1,242. 8 1,102. 8 1 ,029. 4 Liqui dWast

e t o SC C Feedrat

e lb/hr OM A 1,185. 5 1,095. 6 1,003. 0 1,158. 5 1,100. 7 1,026. 9 1,153. 8 1,102. 8 1,068. 8 1,166. 0 1,099. 7 1 ,032. 9 Containerize dSolid s Wast e Feedrat e lb/h

r OM A 565. 8 568. 6 553. 8 562. 8 Bul k Solid s Wast

e Feedrat e Ib/h

r OM A 6,286. 7 6,408. 0 5,992. 6 6,229. 1 Ash Feedrat

e Ib/h r O M A 4,806. 0 4,835. 6 4,689. 9 4,777. 2 PC C Temperatur

e ° F OM A 1,63 1 1,59 1 1,53 7 1,62 3 1,57

4 1,50

3 1,60 1 1,55 9 1,50 8 1,61 8 1,57 5 1 ,51 6 SC C Temperatur

e ° F OM A 1,90 9 1,885 1,86 6 1,90 5 1,88 6 1,86

3 1,89 6 1,88 2 1,870 1,90 3 1,88

4 1 ,86 6 CO , Correcte d to 7 % 0 2 ppmv d OM A 0.3 3 0 .1 4 0.0

0 0.2

6 0.0

9 0.0

0 0.2 1 0.0

8 0.0

0 0.2

7 0.1

0 O.O

O Baghous e Inlet

Temperature2 ° F O M A 40 2 39 8 39 2 40 3 39 7 39 1 407 40 1 39 6 40 4 39 9 39 3 Carbo n Injectio n Rat

e lb/h r OM A 6. 7 6. 2 5. 9 6. 7 6. 2 5. 9 7. 0 6. 2 5. 7 6. 8 6. 2 5. 8

' Proces s dataar

e th e average s fo r

th e duratio n o f

th e emission s samplin g ru n fo r particulate matte

r i n stack
.
2Measure d a

s th e SD A (Spra

y Dryer/Absorber ) Outlet Temperatur

e Note : Value s i n bol dused t o develop OP L



### 2-1 6 VES01770 6Tabl e 2-10 . Uni t 4 - Summar y o f Proces s Data 1 an d Feedrate s Durin g th e Modifie d EP A Metho d 26 A Stac k Samplin g fo r HCI/CI 2 Operating Paramete

r Unit s Basi

s Run l

10-23-1 3 12:3 6 -13:36 Run 2 10-24-1 3 12:35-13:3

5 Ru n 3

10-25-1 3 13:3 5 -14:3 5 Averag e Operating Paramete

r Unit s Basi

s Ma x Av g Mi n Ma x A V E Mi n Ma x Av g Mi n Ma x Avg Mi n Stac k Ga s Flowrat

e acf m HR A 38,04 2 37,93 5 37,85 7 37,26 5 37,17 0 37,06 3 36,87 2 36,75 4 36,57 2 37,39 3 37,28 6 37,16 4 Low-Bt u Liqui dWast

e t o Kil n Feedrat

e lb

/h r OM A 2,105. 9 1,943. 7 0. 0 2,057. 1 1,996. 5 1,863. 0 2,068. 1 1,999. 6 1,942. 1 2,077. 0 1,980. 0 1,268 . 4 High-Bt u Liqui dWast

e t o Kil n Feedral e lb/h r OM A i, 224. 9 1,167. 0 0. 0 1,230. 8 1,205. 4 1,172. 2 1,294. 3 1,201. 0 1,094. 0 1,250. 0 1,191. 2 755 . 4 Liqui dWast

e to SC C Feedrat

e Ib/h

r OM A 1 ,261. 5 1,165. 6 0. 0 1.240. 6 1,203. 1 1 ,126. 5 1,238. 0 1,196. 3 1,171. 4 1,246. 7 1,188. 3 766. 0 Containerize dSolid s Wast e Feedrate 2 lb/hr 860. 0 857. 0 843. 0 853. 3 Bul k Solid s Wast

e Feedrat e Ib/h r 6,093. 0 5,448. 0 5739. 0 5,760. 0 Tota l Chlorin e Feedrat

e lb/h r 203. 0 203. 5 203. 2 203. 2 Sorben tFeedrat

e 1M b CI 2 HR A 2.2 3 2.0 7 2.0 7 2.1 3 Carrie r Flui d Flowrat

e Gal/l b Cl 2 HR A 3.1 6 3.07 3.0 7 3.1 0 PC C Temperatur

e ° F OM A 1 ,63 5 1,58 9 1,49 3 1 ,623 1,56 9 1 ,50

7 1,56

7 1,51 3 1,46

0 1,60

9 1,557 1,48

7 SC C Temperatur

e ° F OM A 1 ,90 9 1 ,88 3 1,80 1 1 ,90 1 1,880 1,83 8 1,90 5 1,87 8 1,84

7 1,90

5 1,88

0 1,828 CO , Correcte d to 7 % O

2 ppmv d OM A 0.2 3 0.0

8 0.0

0 0.2 1 0.0

6 0.0

0 0.2

7 0.0

9 0.0

0 0.2

4 0.0

8 0.0

0 Baghous e Inlet

Temperature 3 ° F OM A 40 9 39 8 38 3 40 3 39 9 39 3 40 6 40 0 39 2 40 6 39 9 38 9 Carbo n Injectio n Rat e lb /h r OM A 6. 7 6. 0 0. 0 6. 5 6. 2 6. 1 6. 7 6. 2 6. 0 6. 6 6. 1 4
. 0

1 Proces s dat

aar e th e average s fo r

th e duratio n o f

th e emission s samplin g run fo r HC1/CI 2 i n stack
.
2Containerize dWast

e Feedrat e include s th

e spike s o f

hexachloroethane , lead nitrate , and mercuri c nitrat e solution
.
3 Measure d a

s the SD A (Spra

y Dryer/Absorber) Outle t Temperature . Note : Value s i n bol duse d t o develo p OPL .



### 2-1 7 VES01770 7Tabl e 2-11 . Uni t 4 - Summar y o f Proces s Data 1 an d Feedrate s Durin g th e EP A Metho d 2 9 Stac k Samplin g fo r Metal s Operatin g Paramete

r Unit s Basi

s Run l

10-23-1 3 12:3 6 -15:2 0 Run 2

10-24-1 3 12:3 5 -15:1 5 Ru n 3 10-25-1 3 13:3 5 -16:1 1 Averag e Operatin g Paramete

r Unit s Basi

s Max Av g Mi n Ma x Avg Mi n Ma x Av g Mi n Max Av g Mi n Stac k Ga s Flowrat

e acf m HR A 38,04 2 37,65 9 37,01 0 37,26 7 37,08 7 36,864 38,29 7 37,19 9 36,57 2 37,86 9 37,31 5 36,81 5 Low-Bt u Liqui dWast

e to Kil n Feedrat

e lb/hr OM A 2,105. 9 1,978. 5 0 . 0 2,113. 9 1,986. 6 1,711. 7 2,072. 2 1,999. 0 1,939. 2 2,097. 3 1,988. 0 1 ,217. 0 High-Bt u Liqui dWast

e t o Kil n Feedrat

e lb/hr OM A 1,232. 7 1,189. 2 0. 0 1,239. 1 1,201. 2 1,159. 0 1,340. 2 1,201. 8 1,094. 0 1,270. 7 1,197. 4 751. 0 Liqui dWast

e t o SC C Feedrat

e Ib/h

r OM A 1,261. 5 1,186. 2 0 . 0 1,240. 6 1,201. 5 1,077. 4 1,238. 0 1,196. 2 1,167. 1 1,246. 7 1,194. 6 748. 1 Containerize dSolid s Wast e Feedrate 2 lb/hr 862. 7 849 . 0 856. 5 856. 1 Bul k Solid s Wast

e Feedrat e lb/h r 5,251. 5 5,598. 4 5345 . 0 5,398. 3 SV M Feedrat

e lb/hr 62. 2 61. 6 62. 2 62. 0 LV M Feedrat

e - Tota l lb/hr 46. 2 46. 3 46. 0 46. 2 LV M Feedrat

e - Pumpabl

e lb/hr 46 . 0 46 . 0 45. 8 45. 9 Mercur y Feedrat

e lb/hr 0.040 2 0.0400 0.040 3 0.040 2 Tota l Chlorin e Feedrat

e Ib/h r 205. 3 204. 1 205. 5 205 . 0 Baghous e Inle tTemperature 3 « p O M A 40 9 39 9 38 3 40 9 39 9 39 0 41 0 39 9 38 8 41 0 39 9 38 7 Carbon Injectio

n Rat e lb/h r OM A 6. 7 6. 1 0
. 0 6. 7 6. 2 5. 9 6. 9 6. 2 5. 9 6. 8 6. 2 3. 9 PC C Temperatur

e 

### «p OM A 1,66 6 1,58 2 1,49 3 1,623 1,57 1 1,50 7 1,60

2 1,52

5 1,46

0 1,63 1 1,55 9 1,48 7 SC C Temperatur

e ° F O M A 1,92 8 1,885 1,80 1 1,90 1 1,879 1,83 8 1,91 2 1,879 1,83 1 1,91 4 1,88 1 1,82 3 CO , Correcte dto 7 % 0 2 ppmv d OM A 0.2 3 0.0

8 0.0

0 0.21 0.0

6 0.0

0 0 .2

7 0.0

8 0.0

0 0.2

4 0 .0

7 0.0

0

1 Proces s dataar

e th e average s fo r

the duratio n o f

th e emission s samplin g run fo r metal s i n stack
.
2Containerize dWast

e Feedrat e include s th

e spike s o f

hexachloroethane , lead nitrate , an d mercuri c nitrat

e solution
.
3 Measure d a

s th e SD A (Spra

y Dryer/Absorber ) Outlet Temperature . Note : Value s i n bol duse d to develo p OPL .



### 2-1 8 VES01770 8Tabl e 2-12 . Uni t 4 - Summar y o f Proces s Data 1 an d Feedrate s Durin g th e SW-846 Metho d 0023 A Stac k Samplin g fo r Dioxins/Furan s Operatin g Paramete

r Unit

s Basi s Run l

10-23-1 3 12:3 6 -15:5 0 Run 2 10-24-1 3 12:35-15:4

5 Ru n 3 10-25-1 3 13:3 5 -16:4 1 Average Operatin g Paramete

r Unit

s Basi s Max Av g Mi n Ma x Av g Mi n Ma x Mi n Max Av g Mi n Stac k Ga s Flowrat

e ACF M HR A 38 ,04 2 37,54 7 36,88 1 37,26 7 37,02 8 36,45 4 38,29 7 37,32 5 36,57 2 37,86 9 37,30 0 36,63 5 Low-Bt u Liqui dWast

e t o Kil n Feedrat

e lb/h r OM A 2,105. 9 1,982. 8 0. 0 2,113. 9 1,950. 9 1,711. 7 2,072. 2 1,998. 3 1,939. 2 2,097. 3 1,977. 4 1,217. 0 High-Bt u Liqui dWast

e to Kil n Feedrat

e lb/hr OM A 1,232. 7 1,190. 9 0. 0 1,239 . 1 1,201. 0 1,159. 0 1,340. 2 1,200. 9 1,094. 0 1,270. 7 1,197 . 6 751. 0 Liqui dWast

e to SC C Feedrat

e lb/h r OM A 1,261. 5 1,187. 5 0. 0 1,240. 6 1,201. 3 1,077. 4 1,238. 0 1,196. 9 1,167. 1 1,246. 7 1 ,195. 2 748. 1 Containerize dSolid s Wast e Feedrate 2 lb/hr 862. 6 841. 6 854. 2 852. 8 Bul k Solid s Wast

e Feedrat e lb/hr 5,322. 4 5,090. 8 5,284. 2 5,232. 5 Total Wast

e Feedrat

e to PCC 3 lb/h r HR A 10,621. 4 9,551. 1 7,192. 1 10,662. 8 9,512. 7 7,097. 6 10,610. 4 9,407. 6 6,913. 6 10,631. 5 9,490. 5 7,067. 8 Total Pumpabl

e Wast e Feedrat

e to PCC 3 lb/h

r HR A 3,466. 7 3,418. 2 3,095. 1 3,465. 0 3,430. 7 3,151. 6 3,473. 2 3,447. 0 3,129. 6 3,468. 3 3,432. 0 3.12S. 4 Total Wast

e Feedrat

e t o SC C (Pumpable

) lb/h

r HR A 1,201. 9 1,184. 2 1 ,078 . 0 1,207. 0 1,197.8 1,082. 2 1,199. 5 1,192.

4 1,077. 6 1,202. 8 1,191. 5 1,079. 3 PC C Temperatur

e ° F O M A 1,666 1,58 0 1,49 3 1,626 1,575 1,50 7 1,60

2 1,52

7 1,46

0 1,63 2 1,56 1 1,48 7 SC C Temperatur

e ° F OM A 1,92 8 1,88 5 1,80 1 1 .91 0 1,88 1 1 ,83 8 1,91 2 1,87 9 1,83 1 1 ,91 7 1,88 1 1,82 3 Baghous e Inle tTemperature 4 ° F OM A 41 0 40 0 38 3 40 9 39 9 39 0 41 3 39 9 38 8 41 1 39 9 38 7 Carbo n Injectio

n Rat e lb/hr OM A 6. 8 6. 2 0. 0 7. 1 6. 2 5. 9 6. 9 6. 2 5. 9 6. 9 6. 2 3. 9 CO , Correcte d to 7 % 0 2 ppmv d OM A 0.2 3 0.0 7 0.0 0 0.2 1 0.0 6 0.0 0 0.2 7 0.0 8 0.0 0 0.24 0.0 7 0.0 0

' Proces s dat

aar e th e average s fo r

th e duratio n o f

th e emission s samphn g run fo r Dioxins/Furan s i n stack
.
2Containerize dWast

e Feedrat e include s th

e spike s o f

hexachloroethane , lea dnitrate , an d mercuri c nitrat e solution
.
3 Tota l Wast

e Feedrat e to PC C an d Tota l Pumpable Wast e Feedrat e to PCC , maximum , average , and minimum , includ e th e average chromi c aci dsolutio n feedrate
.
4 Measure da

s th e SD A (Spra

y Dryer/Absorber ) Outle t Temperature . Note : Value s i n bol duse d t o develo p OPL .



### 2-1 9 VES01770 9Tabl e 2-13 . Uni t 2 - Chlorin e Spikin g Rate s Durin g th e HCI/CI 2 Stac k Samplin g Spikin g Constituen t Spikin g Rat e (lbs/hr ) Spikin g Constituen t Targe t Ru n 1 10-8-1 3 15:4 0 -16:4 0 Ru n 3

10-10-1 3 12:3 0 -13:3 0 Ru n 5

10-30-1 3 12:4 5 -13:4 5 Chlorin e 200-25 0 197.9 203. 1 197. 9

Tabl e 2-14 . Uni t 3 - Chlorin e Spikin g Rate s Durin g th e HCI/CI 2 Stac k Samplin g Spikin g Constituen t Spikin g Rat e (lbs/hr ) I Spikin g Constituen t Targe t Ru n 2 10-16-1 3 14:0 0 -15:0 0 Ru n 3 10-17-1 3 12:30 -13:3 3 Ru n 4 

### 1 10-18-1 3 09:35-10:3 5 \ Chlorin e 200-25 0 203. 1 203.3 197.9 

### 1

Tabl e 2-15 . Uni t 4 - Chlorin e Spikin g Rate s Durin g th e HCI/CI 2 Stac k Samplin g . Spikin g Constituen t Spikin g Rat e (lbs/hr ) Spikin g Constituen t Targe t Run l 10-23-1 3 12:36 -13:3 6 Ru n 2 10-24-1 3 12:3 5 -13:3 5 Ru n 3

10-25-1 3 13:35-14:3 5 Chlorin e 200-25 0 197.9 197. 9 197.9



### 2-2 0 VES01771 0Tabl e 2-16 . Uni t 2 - Spikin g Rate s Durin g th e Metal s Stac k Samplin g Spikin g Constituen t Spikin g Rat e (lbs/hr ) Spikin g Constituen t Targe t Run l 10-8-1 3 15:4 0 -18:4 3 Ru n 3

10-10-1 3 12:30 -15:1 0 Ru n 5 10-30-1 3 12:4 5 -15:3 2 Chromium 40-4 5 45. 8 47.3 45. 8 Lea d 60-6 5 61. 9 61. 7 62. 0 Mercur y 0.001-0.00 3 0.0019 6 0.0019 6 0.0020 4 Chlorin e 20 0 - 25 0 199.

7 199. 2 200.2

Tabl e 2-17 . Uni t 3 - Spikin g Rate s Durin g th e Metal s Stac k Samplin g Spikin g Constituen t Spikin g Rat e (lbs/hr ) Spikin g Constituen t Targe t Ru n 2 10-16-1 3 14:0 0 -16:5 0 Ru n 3

10-17-1 3 12:30 -15:2 5 Ru n 4 10-18-1 3 09:3 5 -12:2 0 IChromium 40-4 5 46. 3 46, 1 45.7 ILea d 60-6 5 62. 1 62.5 62.2 j iVlercur

y 0.001-0.00 3 0.0020 4 0.0020 0 0.0020 9 Chlorin e 20 0 - 25 0 200.3 201.7 200.7

Tabl e 2-18 . Uni t 4 - Spikin g Rate s Durin g th e Metal s Stac k Samplin g Spikin g Constituen t Spikin g Rat e (lbs/hr ) Spikin g Constituen t Targe t Run l 10-23-1 3 12:3 6 -15:2 0 Ru n 2

10-24-1 3 12:3 5 -15:1 5 Ru n 3

10-25-1 3 13:3 5 -16:1 1 Chromium 40-4 5 46. 0 46. 0 45. 8 Lea d 60-6 5 62. 0 61. 1 62. 0 Mercur y 0.02-0.0 6 0.039 3 0.038 8 0.039 4 Chlorin e 20 0 - 25 0 200. 0 197. 2 200.3



### 2-2 1Tabl e 2-19 . Uni t 2 - Analytica l Result s fo r th e Chromiu m Spikin g Solutio n
Chromiu m Ru n 1 Ru n 3 Ru n 5 Chromiu m CO A Concentratio n Analytica l Resul t CO A

Concentratio n Analytica l

Resul t CO A

Concentratio n Analytica l

Resul t Chromiu m (mg/kg ) (mg/kg ) (mg/kg ) Beginning o f

Metho d 2

9 Sampl e 178,88 1 178,00 0 178,87 1 178,00 0 178,88 1 174,00 0 Middl e o f

Metho d 29 Sampl

e 178,88 1 172,00 0 178,87 1 174,00 0 178,88 1 173,00 0 En d o f Metho d 2

9 Sampl e 178,88 1 169,00 0 178,87 1 178,00 0 178,88 1 170,00 0
Tabl e 2-20 . Uni t 2 - Analytica l Result s fo r th e Mercur y Spikin g Solutio n

Mercur y Run l Ru n 3 Ru n 5 Mercur y Calculate d Concentratio n Analytica l Resul t Calculate d

Concentratio n Analytica l

Resul t Calculate d

Concentratio n Analytica l

Resul t Mercur y (lig/rol ) (mg/kg ) (pg/ml ) (mg/kg ) (lig/ml ) (mg/kg ) Beginning o f

Metho d 2

9 Sampl e 2,32

3 1,96

0 2,32

3 2,37

0 2,32

3 2,21 0 Middl e of

Method 2

9 Sampl e 2,32

3 2,05

0 2,32

3 2,150 2,32 3 2,12

0 En d o f Metho d 2

9 Sampl e 2,32

3 2,39

0 2,32

3 1,95

0 2,32

3 2,25

0



### 2-2 2
VES01771 2Tabl e 2-21 . Uni t 3 - Analytica l Result s fo r th e Chromiu m Spikin g Solutio n
Chromiu m Ru n 2 Ru n 3 Ru n 4 Chromiu m CO A Concentratio n Analytica l

Resul t CO A

Concentratio n Analytica l

Resul t CO A

Concentratio n Analytica l

Resul t Chromiu m (mg/kg ) (mg/kg ) (mg/kg ) Beginning o f

Metho d 2

9 Sampl e 179,13

7 176,00

0 179,13

7 176,00

0 179,13

7 176,00

0 Middl e of

Method 2

9 Sampl e 179,13

7 173,00

0 179,13

7 179,00

0 179,13

7 172,00

0 En d o f Method 29 Sampl

e 179,13

7 177,00

0 179,13

7 174,00

0 179,13

7 173,00

0
Tabl e 2-22 . Uni t 3 - Analytica l Result s fo r th e Mercur y Spikin g Solutio n

Mercur y Ru n 2 Ru n 3 Ru n 4 Mercur y Calculate d Concentratio n Analytica l

Resul t Calculate d

Concentratio n Analytica l

Resul t Calculate d

Concentratio n Analytica l

Resul t Mercur y (Ug/ml) (mg/kg ) (ug/ml ) (mg/kg ) (ug/ml ) (mg/kg ) Beginning o f

Metho d 2

9 Sampl e 2,32

3 2,42

0 2,32

3 2,46

0 2,32

3 2,48

0 Middl e o f

Metho d 2

9 Sampl e 2,32

3 2,38

0 2,32

3 2,39

0 2,32

3 2,50

0 En d o f Method 2

9 Sampl e 2,32

3 2,38

0 2,32

3 2,48

0 2,32

3 2,48

0



### 2-23 VES01771 3Tabl e 2-23 . Uni t 4 - Analytica l Result s fo r th e Chromiu m Spikin g Solutio n
Chromiu m Run l Ru n 2 Ru n 3 Chromiu m CO A Concentratio n Analytica l

Resul t CO A

Concentratio n Analytica l

Resul t CO A

Concentratio n Analytica l

Resul t Chromiu m (mg/kg) (mg/kg ) (mg/kg ) Beginnin g o

f Method 2

9 Sampl e 179,13

7 171,00

0 179,13

7 173,00

0 179,00

9 169,00

0 Middl e o f

Metho d 2 9 Sampl e 179,13

7 175,00

0 179,13

7 172,00

0 179,00

9 172,00

0 En d of Metho d 2 9 Sampl e 179,13

7 169,00

0 179,13

7 174,00

0 179,00

9 176,00

0
Tabl e 2-24 . Uni t 4 - Analytica l Result s fo r th e Mercur y Spikin g Solutio n

Mercur y Run l Ru n 2 Ru n 3 Mercur y Calculate d Concentratio n Analytica l

Resul t Calculate d

Concentratio n Analytica l

Resul t Calculate d

Concentratio n Analytica l

Resul t Mercur y (Ug/ml) (mg/kg ) (ug/ml ) (mg/kg ) (Mg/ml

) (mg/kg

) Beginnin g of

Method 2

9 Sampl e 23,22

8 21,30

0 23,22

8 19,70

0 23,22

8 22,00

0 Middl e o f

Metho d 2 9 Sampl e 23,22

8 18,70

0 23,22

8 19,90

0 23,22

8 21,30

0 En d o f Metho d 2 9 Sampl e 23,22

8 19,30

0 23,22

8 21,00

0 23,22

8 21,40

0



### 2-2 4 VES01771 4

## 3. 0 Sampling , Analysis , an d Monitorin g Procedure s Th e subsequen

t CP T wa s performeda

t on e tes t conditio n on each o f

th e thre e incinerator s to demonstrat

e syste mperformanc e an

dt o establis h appropriat

e operating paramete

r limit s (OPLs ) fo r

al l o f th e applicabl e standard

s o f th e HW C MACT . Th e CP T include dthre e replicate samplin g runs o

n eac h incinerator

a t th e on e test condition
. Table 3- 1 summarize s th e parameters tha t wer e measure d durin g th

e tes t o f eac h o f th e thre e incinerators andth

e frequenc y o f measurement . Th

e CP T wa s conducte

di n accordance wit

h th e comprehensiv

e performance tes t plan s fo r Unit s 2,3 , an

d4 (i.e
. th e CP T Plan ) an

dQualit y Assuranc e Projec t

Pla n (QAPjP ) date d Septembe r 25 , 201 3 tha

t wer e approve db y EP A Regio n 5 . 3. 1 Samplin g Location s an d Procedure s Sample s wer

e collecte do f

solid , liquid , an

dga s stream s durin g th

e CPT . Tabl e 3- 2 summarize s th

e sampling method

s fo r eac h strea man dth e parameter

s tha t wer e determined
. Refe r t o th e QAPj P fo r

mor e detaileddescription s o f

th e method s andth e qualit y contro l activitie s fo r

eac h method
. Sectio n 5. 0 present s adiscussio n o f

th e QA/Q C activitie s performe d fo r th e CPT . 3.1. 1 Liquid s Samplin g Procedure s Samples ofth e liqui dwast e feed s wer

e collecte dever

y 1 5 minute s during eac

h ofth e thre e runs o f th e CP T fo r eac h o f th e thre e incinerator s beginning a t th e star t o f stac k sampling throug

h completio n o f

stac k sampling fo r

bot h th e firs t andsecon

dpart s o f th e CPT . Individua l samples (i.e. , sub-samples ) wer e collecte dever

y 1 5 minute s throughou

t th e test, andcompositedfo r

analysis
. Samples ofth e liqui dwast e feed s wer

e collecte da

t 15-minut e interval s durin g th

e collectio n o f

th e Metho d5 sampling trai n o f th e firs t par t o f eac h ru n o f th e test , an ddurin g th e collectio n o f

th e Modifie dMetho d26A , Metho d29 , an dMetho d0023 A sampling train s o f the secon dpar t o f eac h ru n o f th e test . Composit

e sample s wer

e prepared o f

th e sample s collecte dduring eac

h o f th e Metho d5 , Modifie dMetho d26A , Metho d29 , an dMetho d 0023 A samplin

g times
. Al l o f

th e composit

e liqui dwast

e fee dsample s fro mth

e firs t par t and th e secon dpar t o f th e CP T wer

e analyze dfo r ash , tota l chlorine , hea

t content , moisture , density , an dviscosity
. Th

e composit

e liqui dwast

e fee dsamples collecte ddurin g th e Metho d2

9 stac k samplin g wer e als o analyzedfo r

metal s (arsenic , beryllium , chromium , cadmium , lead , an d mercury) .

3- 1

### I n additio n t

o th e collectio n o f

sub-sample s ever

y 1 5 minute s o f

th e liqui dwastes , individual sample s wer

e collecte dan

darchivedfo r

furthe r analysis , i f

required
. Sample s ofth e chromiu

man dmercur y spikin g solution s wer

e collecte di n eac

h run o f th e secon dpar t o f th e tes t o f eac h incinerator
. A t

th e beginning , middl e (a

t por t change) , an

d en do f th e Metho d2 9 sampling o f

th e secon dpar t o f th e test , sample s o f

th e chromiu man d mercur y spikin g solution s wer

e collected
. The individual sample s o f th e chromiu man d mercur y spikin g solution s collecte ddurin g eac h Metho d29 samplin g ru n ofth e tes t o f eac h incinerato r wer e analyze dfo r

chromiu mor mercury , respectively
. A fourt h sampl e o f th e chromiu man dmercur y spikin g solution s wa

s collecte da

t th e completio n o f

th e Metho d O023 A sampling train
. Thi s fourt h sampl e wa s archived(i.e. , no

t analyzed)
. Liqui dwast

e sample s wer

e collecte dupstrea

mo f an y meta l spikin g location
. Spli t sample s o f

th e composit

e liqui dwast

e fee dan dth e chromiu man dmercur y spikin g solution s fro m on e ru n wer e take n b y th e Illinoi s EP A and/o

r U.S . EP A Regio n 5 .

3- 2
VES01771 6Tabl e 3-1 . Measuremen t Frequenc y

— ^ ' ^

Sampl e Frequenc y fo r Stream/Parameter s th e SubsequentCP T Firs tPar t Second Par t Liqui d Wast

e Fee d As h 3 3 Chlorine •' 3 3 Moistur e 3 3 Heatin g Valu e 3 3 Viscosity , Densit

y 3 3 Metals 3 ' Soli d Wast

e Fee d - Containerize d an d Bul k (Uni t4 ) As h 3 3 Chlorin e 3 3 Moistur e 3 3 Heatin g Valu e 3 3 Metal s 3 ' Spikin g Materials 2 Mercur y Spikin g Solution 3 Lea d Soli d Spikin g Materia l 3 Chromiu m Spikin g Solution 3 Chlorine Soli d Spikin g Materia l (i f spiked) 3 Stac k Ga s Metal s 3 1 Particulat

e Matte r 3 HCl/Cl 2 3 Dioxins/Furans 3 C 0 2 ) 0 2 Continuous Continuous 3 1 Total Hydrocarbon s Continuous 3 Moistur e Concurren twit h Concurren

twit h isokineti c samplin g isokinetic samplin g CO , 0 2 4 Continuous Continuou s

1 Analysi s i

s fo r As , Be , Cd , Cr , Pb , an d Hg .
2Each collected sampl e ofth e mercur

y an d chromiu

m spikin g solution

s wer e analyze

d fo r th e targe tspikin g metal . Sample

s ofth e lea

d an d chlorin e spikin g material

s wer e archived .
3 Allowin g fo r hourl

y calibratio

n o f th e TH C monitor.
4Plan tmonitors .Tabl e 3-2 . Samplin g Method s Strea m Samplin g Metho d Samplin

g Frequenc

y Compositin

g Approac h Analytica

l Parameter

s Liqui dWast

e Fee d Unit s 2 an

d3 Low-Bt u

- High-Bt u Liqui d (Specialty ) Wast e Uni t 4 Low-Bt u t

o Kil n High-Bt u t

o Kil n Liqui dWast

e t o SC C Ta p (Metho dS004 ) Firs t par t o f the tes t conditio n - Every 1 5 Minute s Durin g Metho d5 samplin g Secondpar

t o f th e tes t conditio n - Ever

y 1 5 Minute s Durin g Modifie dMetho d 26A , Metho d29 , and Metho d0023 A samplin g Subsample s fro m

each test perio d composite d As h

Chlorin e Moistur e Heatin g Valu e Densit y Viscosity Metals 1

Soli dWast

e Fee d Unit s 2 and3 Containerize d XInit4 Containerize d • Bul k Gra b or Scoop (Metho dS007) ~ Solid s Firs t par t o f th e tes t conditio n - Every 1 5 Minute s Durin g Metho d5 samphng Secon dpar

t o f th e tes t conditio n - Ever

y 1 5 Minute s Durin g Modifie dMetho d 26A , Metho d29 , an d Metho d0023 A samplin g Subsample s fro m

eac h tes t perio d composite d As h

Chlorin e Moistur e Heatin g Valu e Metals 1

Chromiu mSpikin g Solutio n Ta p (Metho dSOW) Secon dpar t o f th e test conditio n - Beginning , middle , an dendo f Metho d2 9 samplin g En do f Metho d0023 A samplin g Subsample s

collecte ddurin g Metho d2 9 samplin g analyze d Subsampl e collecte d a t en d o f Metho d 0023 A samplin g archive d Chromiu m

Mercury Spikin g Solutio n Gra b Secondpar t o f the tes t conditio n - Beginning , middle , an dendo f Metho d2 9 samplin g En do f Metho d0023 A samplin g Subsample s

collecte ddurin g Metho d2 9 samplin g analyze d Subsampl e collecte d a t endo f Metho d 0023 A samplin g archive d Mercury

3- 4
VES01771 8Tabl e 3-2 . (continued ) Samplin g Method s Strea m Samplin

g Metho d Samplin g Frequenc

y Compositin

g Approac h Analytica

l Parameter

s
Lea dan dChlorin e Spikin g Material s Gra b Secondpar t o f th e tes t conditio n - Beginning , middle , an

den do f Metho d2 9 samplin g En do f Metho d0023 A samplin g Non e - Archiv e Archiv e

Stack Ga s EP A Metho d2 Concurren t with isokineti c samplin g fo r EP A Method s 5 , 29 , an dSW-84 6 Melho d 0023 A N R Flowrat e

Stack Ga s EP A Metho d3 A Concurren t wit h isokineti c samplin g - Firs t an dSecon dPart s o f th e Tes t N R 0 2 , C0 2

Stack Ga s EP A Metho d4 Concurren t wit h isokineti c samphng - Firs t an dSecon dPart s ofth e Tes t N R Moistur e

Stack Ga s EP A Metho d5 1+hou r collecte d isokineticall y - Firs t Par t o f th e Tes t N R P M Stack Ga s Modifie dEP A Metho d26 A 1 + hou r collecte d isokineticall y a

t singl e point - SecondPar

t o f th e Tes t N R HC1/C1 2 Stack Ga s

EP A Metho d2 9 2 + hou r collecte d isokineticall y - Secon d Par t o f th e Tes t N R Metal s 1 Stack Ga s

SW-84 6 Metho d0023 A 3 + hou r collecte d isokineticall y - Secon d Par t o f th e Tes t N R Dioxins/Furan s Stack Ga s

EP A Metho d25 A Concurren t with isokineti c samplin g - Secon dPar

t o f the Tes t N R TH C Stack Ga s

Plan t CEM S Continuou s N R CO,0 2 Analysi s fo r

As , Be , Cd , Cr , Pb , andH g onl y i n sample s fro mth e second par

t o f th e tes t conditio n collecte ddurin g Metho d 2 9 stac k samphng
. N R= No t

Require d

3-5
VES01771 9

### 3.1.2 Solid s Samplin g Procedure s Sample s o f

th e containerizedsoli dwast e fee dfe dto Unit s 2 , 3 , an d4 , an dth e bulk solid s fe dt

o Uni t 4 , wer e collecte dever

y 1 5 rninute s durin g th

e collectio n o f

th e Metho d5 samplin g trai n o f th e firs t par t o f eac h ru n o f th e test, an dduring the collectio n o f

th e Modifie dMetho d26A , Metho d29 , an dMetho d0023 A sampling train s o f th e secon dpar t o f eac h run o f th e test. Composit

e sample s wer

e prepare d o f th e sample s collecte ddurin g eac h ofth e Metho d5 , Modifie dMetho d26A , Metho d29 , an dMetho d0023 A sampling times
. Al l o f th e composit

e soli dwast

e fee dsample s fro mth

e first par t an dth e secon dpar t of th e CP T wer e analyzedfo r

ash , tota l chlorine , hea

t content , an dmoisture
. The composit

e soli dwast

e fee d samples collecte dduring th e Metho d2

9 stac k samphn g wer e als o analyzedfo r

metal s (arsenic , beryllium , chromium , cadmium , lead , an dmercury) . I n additio n t

o th e collectio n o f

sub-sample s ever

y 1 5 minute s o f

th e soli dwastes , individual samples wer

e collecte dan

darchive dfo r

furthe r analysis , i f

required
. Spike s o f soli dlea dan dchlorine wer

e adde d t o th e containerizedsoli dwast e i n th e tes t o f eac h incinerator
. Sample s o f

th e lea d(a s lea dnitrate ) an dth e chlorine (a

s hexachloroethane

) wer e collecteddurin

g th e Metho d29 stac

k sampling i n th

e secon dpar t o f th e test . Thre

e gra b sample s o f th e chlorin e an

dlea dspikin g material s wer

e collecte da

t th e beginning , middl e (a

t por t change) , an den do f th e Metho d29 samplin g o f

th e secon dpar t o f th e test . A fourt

h sampl e o f th e lea dand chlorin e spikin g material s wa

s collecte da

t th e completion o f

th e Metho d0023 A sampling trai n i n th e secon dpar t o f th e test . Al l samples ofth e lea dan dchlorine spikin g material s wer e archived (i.e. , no t analyzed)
. Sample s o f

th e composit

e soli dwast

e feed s an

dth e chlorine an

dlea dspikin g solution s fro mon

e ru n wer e take n b y th e Illinoi s EP A and/o

r U.S . EP A Regio n 5 . 3.1.3 Stac k

Ga s Samplin g Procedure s Stac k ga s emission s wer

e sampledfo r

determinatio

n o f th e parameter

s indicate di n Table s 5- 1 an

d5-2 . Th e stac k sample s collecte dusin g isokineti c sampling method s wer e particulat e matte r by EP A Metho d5 , HC I andCh usin g aModifie dMetho d26A , metal s b y EP A Metho d29 , an

ddioxins/furan s b y SW-84 6 Metho d0023A . Tabl e 3-3 , Tabl e 3-4 , an dTabl e 3- 5 presen t summarie s o f

th e sampling dat

afo r th e isokineti c samplm

g train s fo r

th e CP T testing o f Uni t 2 , Uni t 3 , an dUni t 4 , respectively
.

3- 6Tabl e 3-3 . Uni t 2 - Summar y o f Isokineti c Samplin g

Run Analytica

l Paramete

r Dat e Tim

e Averag

e Stac k Temperatur

e CF ) Velocit

y (ft/sec ) Flu e Ga s Moistur e <% ) o 2 (vo l % ) co 2 (vo l % ) Avg Flowrat e (acfm ) Avg Flowrat e (dscfm ) Volum

e a tMete r (dscf ) Isokineti

c Sampling Rat e {•%)

1 P M 10-8-1 3 11:50-13:00 39 0 30.5 0 41. 2 11.5 6 6.3 5 14,79 6 5,39 5 40.81 5 97. 9 1 HC1/C1 2 10-8-1 3 15:40-16:40 39 1 29.9 7 45. 1 10.0 8 7.9 5 14,53 7 4,94 2 37.38 4 103. 5 1 Metal s 10-8-1 3 15:40-18:4 3 38 9 31.4 1 45. 5 10.0 8 7.9 5 15,23 5 5,15 6 84.95 2 107. 1 1 Dioxins/Furan s 10-8-1 3 15:40-18:5 5 38 7 30.0 5 44. 7 10.0 8 7.9 5 14,57 8 5,01 7 121.16 4 104. 6 2 P M 10-9-1 3 09:45-10:5 3 39 0 31.07 41. 6 11.2 3 6.5 6 15,07 0 5,45 1 42.35 6 100. 5

3 P M 10-10-1 3 09:15-10:2 3 39 1 30.4 2 42. 0 11.4 8 6.2 8 14,75 3 5,28 7 41.27 8 101. 0 3 HCI/C1 2 10-10-1 3 12:30-13:3 0 39 6 31.9 5 45. 9 10.3 8 7.5 0 15,49 8 5,15 0 37.29 0 99. 0 3 Metal s 10-10-1 3 12:30-15:1 0 39 3 31.3 6 45. 8 10.3 8 7.5 0 15,21 2 5,08 1 78.95 1 101. 0 3 Dioxins/Furan s 10-10-1 3 12:30-15:40 39 6 32.0 5 45. 3 10.3 8 7.5 0 15,54 4 5,225 119.56 8 99. 1
5 HC1/C1 2 10-30-1 3 12:45-13:4 5 39 2 31.2 1 43. 8 10.5 0 7.25 15,13 8 5,22 5 36.87 9 96. 1 5 Metal s 10-30-1 3 12:45-15:3 2 38 6 31.0 6 43. 8 10.5 0 7.25 15,06 4 5,23 6 79.60

7 97. 9 Dioxins/Furan s 10-30-1 3 12:45-16:0 2 38 9 33.1 0 42. 9 . 10.5 0 7.25 16,05 6 5,65 0 124.92 1 95.3

3- 7
VES01772 1\
Tabl e 3-4 . Uni t 3 - Summar y o f Isokineti c Samplin g

Ru n Analytica

l Paramete

r Dat

e Tim

e Averag

e Stac k Temperatur

e (°F ) Velocit

y (ft/sec ) Flu e Ga s Moistur e (% ) (vo

l % ) co 2 (vo l % ) Avg Flowrat e (acfm ) Av g Flowrat e (dscfm ) Volum

e a tMete r (dscf ) Isokineti

c Sampling Rat e (% ) I P M 10-15-1 3 13:16-14:2 5 36 5 29.9 4 38. 3 12.8 7 5.3 1 14,52 3 5,67 5 41.22 9 98. 9

2 P M 10-16-1 3 11:15-12:2 5 36 6 30.7 5 36. 2 13.3 8 4.9 6 14,91 6 6,03 4 42.46 1 96. 2 2 HC1/C1 2 10-16-1 3 14:00-15:0 0 36 8 30.9 8 41. 6 11.1 9 6.8 8 15,02 8 5,54 2 36.08 8 101. 6 2 Metal s 10-16-1 3 14:00-16:5 0 36 7 30.6 8 43. 5 11.1 9 6.8 8 14,88 2 5,31 9 71.70 8 103. 6 2 Dioxins/Furan s 10-16-1 3 14:00-17:2 0 36 7 30.9 2 42. 9 11.1 9 6.8 8 14,99 6 5,42 0 106.30 3 102. 5

3 P M 10-17-1 3 09:50-10:5 7 36 8 30.6 6 41. 0 11.7 4 6.0 2 14,87 0 5,54 9 41.92 1 103. 3 3 HCI/C1 2 10-17-1 3 12:30-13:3 3 36 6 30.3 5 43. 2 10.7 2 7.3 6 14,72 1 5,29 3 34.59 7 101. 9 3 Metal s 10-17-1 3 12:30-15:2 5 36 7 30.2 2 44. 5 10.7 2 7.3 6 14,65 8 5,15 0 69.01 6 102. 9 3 Dioxins/Furan s 10-17-1 3 12:30-15:5 5 36 7 30.7 2 44. 4 10.7 2 7.3 6 14,90 1 5,24 8 102.72 4 102. 3

4 HC1/C1 2 10-18-1 3 09:35-10:3 5 36 8 32.0 6 43. 4 10.8 7 7.2 6 15,54 9 5,57 9 35.24 1 98. 5 4 Metal s 10-18-1 3 09:35-12:2 0 36 8 31.5 2 44. 1 10.8 7 7.2 6 15,29 2 5,41 4 71.54 0 101. 5

Dioxins/Furan s 10-18-1 3 09:35-12:5 0 36 8 30.5 9 43. 7 10.8 7 7.2 6 14,83 9 5,29 0 102.62 4 101. 4

3- 8
VES01772 2I Tabl e 3-5 . Uni t 4 - Summar y o f Isokineti c Samplin g

Ru n Analytica

l Paramete

r Dat e Time Averag e SUck Temperatur

e (°F ) Velocit

y (ft/sec ) Flu e Ga s Moistur e (% ) o 2 (vo l % ) co 2 (vo l % ) Avg Flowrat e (acfm ) Avg Flowrat e (dscfm ) Volum

e a tMete r (dscf ) Isokineti

c Samplin g Rat e (% )

1 P M 10-23-1 3 09:30-10:4 2

- 37 4 57.5 5 39. 4 12.2 2 5.5 9 43,27 5 16,48 3 38.18 1 97. 9 1 HC1/C1 2 10-23-1 3 12:36-13:3 6 37 7 60.3 0 39. 6 12.2 7 5.8 6 45,34 5 17,15 7 39.93 5 99. 1 1 Metal s 10-23-1 3 12:36-15:20 37 1 57.2 6 39. 7 12.2 7 5.8 6 43,06 1 16,38 2 76.06 8 100. 1 1 Dioxins/Furan s 10-23-1 3 12:36-15:5 0 37 0 55.1 2 39. 2 12.2 7 5.8 6 41,45 5 15,91 9 110.79 1 100. 7
2 HC1/C1 2 10-24-1 3 12:35-13:3 5 37 7 57.9 1 38. 6 12.3 7 5.7 4 43,55 0 16,82 4 39.264 99. 3 2 Metal s 10-24-1 3 12:35-15:1 5 37 0 57.7 2 38. 6 12.3 7 5.7 4 43,41 0 16,91 7 76.49 8 97. 5 Dioxins/Furan s 10-24-1 3 12:35-15:4 5 37 0 55.3 2 38. 3 12.3 7 5.7 4 41,59 8 16,284 112.80 3 100. 3

3 P M 10-25-1 3 09:35-10:4 0 37 2 57.3 5 38. 7 12.4 8 5.45 43,12 6 16,84 7 39.69 1 100. 3 3 HC1/C1 2 10-25-1 3 13:35-14:3 5 37 8 54.6 6 39. 3 12.0 0 5.9 6 41,10 2 15,79 6 37.03 4 99. 8 3 Metal s 10-25-1 3 13:35-16:1 1 37 3 57.9 4 39. 8 12.0 0 5.9 6 43,57 5 16,72 3 76.84 6 99. 1 3 Dioxins/Furan s 10-25-1 3 13:35-16:4 1 37 4 56.9 5 39. 3 12.0 0 5.9 6 42,82 9 16,55 0 115.284 100. 8 4 P M 10-25-1 3 10:50-11:5 5 37 4 54.5 2 39. 5 12.1 1 5.7 1 40,99 8 15,76 8 36.75 9 100. 5

3- 9
VES01772 3

### 3.1.3. 1 Sampl e Por t Locatio n The Uni t 2 an d Uni t 3 stack s ar e 90-fee t hig h an dhave a n inside diamete

r o f 3 9 inches
. Ther e ar e tw o set s of tw o orthogona

l port s locateda

t tw o slightl y different

levels
. Onl y th

e uppe r se t o f orthogona

l port s ar e suitable for , an

dwer e use dfor , isokineti c sampling
. A n additiona l por t locate d abou

t fou r fee t belo w th e uppe r orthogona

l ports , an dabou t 45 ° betwee

n th e orthogona l ports , wa

s use dfo r th e Modifie dMetho d26 A samphn g fo r HCI /CI2 . Th e numbe r o f sampling point s fo r

th e isokineti c sampling by Metho d5 , Metho d29 , an dMetho d0023 A wa

s determine di n accordance wit

h EP A Metho d1 . Th e Uni t 4 stac k i s 100-fee

t hig h an dha s a n insid e diamete

r o f 4 8 inches
. Ther

e ar e fou r orthogona l port s locateda

t on e level
. A n additiona

l por t locate dabou

t fou r feet belo w th e uppe r orthogona l ports , an dabou t 45 ° betwee

n th e orthogona

l ports , wa

s use dfo r th e Modifie dMetho d 26 A samplin g fo r

HC1/C1 2 

### . The numbe

r o f sampling point s fo r

th e isokineti c samplin g b y Metho d5 , Metho d29 , an

dMetho d0023 A wa

s determinedi n accordance wit h EP A Metho d1 . 3.1.3. 2 EP A Method s 2 an d 4 (Flowrat e an d Moisture) Concurren

t wit h th e performanc e o f

th e isokineti c samphn

g trains , measurement

s wer e mad e t o detennin

e ga s velocit y b y 4 0 CF RPar

t 60 , Appendi x A , Metho d2 , an dmoistur e b y Metho d4 . Th e absenc

e o f cycloni c flo w wa

s determinedb y performin g acycloni c flo w check , prescribedi n EP A Metho d2 , prio r t o th e CP T testing o f

eac h incinerator
. 3.1.3. 3 EP A Method 5 (PM ) Sample s fo r

th e determination o f

particulat e matte r (PM ) i n stac

k emission s wer

e collecte di n th

e firs t par t o f th e test s o f eac h incinerator

usin g EP A Metho d5 . Thi s sampl e trai n consistedo f

th e followin g components :

• Glas s (quartz) nozzle ; • Heated , glas s (quartz)-linedprobe ;
• Heate dfilte r wit h aTeflo n filte r

support ;
• Optiona

l empt y knockou

t impinger ; • Modifie dGreenburg-Smit h impinge r containin g 10

0 m L o f D I water ;
• Greenburg-Smit

h impinge r containin g 10

0 m L o f D I water ;
• Empt y Modifie dGreenburg-Smit h impinger ; an

d
• Modifie dGreenburg-Smit h impinge

r containin g silic agel
. Th e procedure s specifie di n EP A Metho d5 protoco l wer e use dt o determin

e particulat

e matter . Thes e procedure s requir

e th e isokineti c extractio n o f

particulat e matte r on afilte r

maintained a

t a controlle dtemperatur

e betwee n 223° F an

d273°F . Th e particulat

e mas s include s th

e mas s
3-1 0

### determine dgravimetrically i n th

e probe andnozzl e rins e (PNR ) wit h acetone , afte

r evaporatio n an ddesiccation , an

dfilter afte r desiccation
. 3.1.3. 4 Modifie d EP A Metho d 26 A (HCI/CI 2



### ) Durin g th e secon dpar t o f th e tes t o f eac h incinerator , sample s fo r th e determination o f HC17C1 2 i n stac

k emission s wer

e collecte dusin g amodificatio n o f EP A Metho d26 A propose d an dapprovedby EP A Regio n 5 . Thi s sampl e train consiste do f

th e followin g components :

• Glas s (quartz

) nozzle ; • Heated , glas s (quartz)-lined probe ; • HeatedTeflo n ma

t filte r wit h aTeflon ® filte r

support ;
• Teflon ® transfe

r line ; • Optiona

l empt y knockou

t impinger ; • Greenburg-Smit

h impinge

r containin g 10

0 m L o f 0. 1 N H2SO4 ; 

### • Greenburg-Smit

h impinge

r containin g 10

0 m L o f 0. 1 N H2SO4 ; 

### • Modifie dGreenburg-Smit h impinge

r containin g 10

0 m L o f 0. 1 N NaOH ; • Modifie dGreenburg-Smit h impinge

r containin g 10

0 m L o f 0. 1 N NaOH ; an

d
• Modifie dGreenburg-Smit h impinge

r containin g silic agel
. The procedure s specifie di n EP A Metho d5 , a s referencedi n EP A Metho d26A , wer e use dfo r th e isokineti c collectio n o f

th e sampl e excep t tha t th e sampl e wa s collecte da

t asingl e poin

t locateda t th e cente r o f th e stack
. A Teflon ® unio n wa s use dt o connec t th e glas s or quart z nozzl e t o th e glas s o r quart z prob e liner , an dth e filte r an dprobe wer

e kept a t atemperatur

e betwee n 248° F and273°F . A Teflon®-backe dfilter was used , a

s specifie di n EP A Metho d26A . 3.1.3. 5 EP A Metho d 2

9 (Metals

) Sample s o f

th e stac k ga s emission s wer

e collecte dfo r

th e determination o f

metal s durin g th e secon dpar t o f th e tes t o f eac h incinerator
. Th e stac

k ga s sample s wer

e collecte d isokineticall y fo r

th e HW C MAC T metal s As , Be , Cd , Cr , Pb , an dH g usin g Metho d2

9 fro m4 0 CF RPar t 60 , Appendix A . Thi s metho

di s basically a

n EP A Metho d5 sampling trai n wit h som e ver y specifi c modifications :

• Glas s nozzle ;
• Heated , glass-line dprobe ;
• Heate dfilter ;
3-1 1

### • Teflo n transfe r line ;
• Empt y modifie dGreenburg-Smit h impinger ;
• Modifie dGreenburg-Smit h impinge

r containin g 10

0 m L o f 5 % HNO 3 an d10 % H 2 

### 0 2 

### ;
• Greenburg-Smit

h impinge r containin g 10

0 m L o f 5 % HNO 3 an d 10% H 2 

### 0 2 

### ;
• Empt y modifie dGreenburg-Smit h impinger ;
• Modifie dGreenburg-Smit h impinge

r containin g 10

0 m L o f 4 % KMn0 4

### an

d10 % H 2 

### S0 4 

### ;
• Modifie dGreenburg-Smit h impinge

r containin g 10

0 m L o f 4% KMn0 4

### an

d10 % H 2 

### S0 4 

### ; an d

• Modifie dGreenburg-Smit h impinge

r containin g silic agel
. A Teflon ® transfe

r lin e wa s usedbetwee

n th e filte r an dth e firs t impinger
. Thi s i s don

e t o addres s spac e limitation s on th

e stack , t o allo w fo r

ease i n prob e moving , an dt o minimiz e potentia

l hazards movin g th

e ver y larg e an dheav y impinge

r box
. Followin g sampling , th

e prob e an

dnozzl e o f

th e sampling trai n wer

e recoveredusin g a bras h containin g n

o meta l using 0. 1 norma

l nitri c acid
. 3.1.3. 6 SW-84

6 Method 0023

A (Dioxins/Furans ) Stack ga s emission s wer

e sampledisokineticall y fo r dioxins/furan s i n th

e secon dpar t o f th e tes t o f eac h incinerato

r using SW-84 6 Metho d0023A . Th e sampling train consists ofth e followin g components :

• Glas s nozzle ;
• Heated , glass-line dprobe ;
• Heate dfilter ;
• Heate dTeflon ® transfe

r line ;
• Sorben

t module ; • Knock-ou

t impinger ; • Greenburg-Smit

h impinge

r containin g 10

0 m L water ;
• Modifie dGreenburg-Smit h impinge

r containin g 10

0 m L water ; and
• Modifie dGreenburg-Smit h impinge

r containin g silic agel
. Fro mth e heate d filter , sampl

e ga s wa s passe d throug h aheate d Teflon ® transfe

r lin e befor

e enterin g th e sorben t module
. The sorben

t module consistedo f

awater-cooledcondense

r an da
3-1 2
VES01772 6

### resi n tra p containing XAD- 2 resin
. Th e condense

r i s use dto ensur e tha t th e ga s enterin g th e resin tra p i s below 68°F . Isotopically-labele ddioxins/furan s wer e spike dont

o th e XAD-2 ® resin bot

h befor e fiel d samplin g (surrogat

e standards ) an

dint o appropriat

e place s i n th

e preparation prio r

t o analysi s afte r returning fro mth

e field
. 3.1.3. 7 Continuou s Emission s Monitorin g (THC , C0 2 

### , C O an d 0 2 

### ) CEM s wer

e use dt o monito r th e concentration s o f

tota l hydrocarbon s (THC) , carbon dioxid e (C0 2 

### ) , carbo

n monoxid

e (CO) , andoxyge

n (O2 ) i n th e stac k gas . CO , correctedt

o 7 % 0 2

### i s reporte

d fo r th e stac k gases fro mpermanen

t installatio n CEM S o n each o f

th e thre e incinerators
. Th

e concentration s o f

THC , C0 2 

### , an

d0 2

### i n th e stac k ga s wer e determinedusing EP A Method s 25 A an d3A , respectively
. CO 2 an d0 2

### wer e monitore

dusin g Metho d3 A t

o determin

e th e stac k ga s compositio n (i.e. , molecula r weight ) use dt o determin

e the flowrate o f

th e stac k gas , an dt o correc t th e stac k sampling results t

o 7 % oxygen . Bot

h o f thes e methods utiliz e continuou s monitors
. 3. 2 Analysi s Procedure s Sample s collecte ddurin g th e CP T wer

e analyze dfo r

th e parameter

s specifie di n Tabl e 3-6 . Al l analyse s wer e performedb y Tes t

Americ aLaboratorie s i n Knoxville , TN . Analytica l results fo r

th e wast e fee dsample s ar

e reported o

n a n as-received

o r wet weight basis
. Sample s o f

th e wast e fee dwer

e no t drie dprio r

t o analysis
. Tabl e 3-6 . Summar

y o f Analytica l Method s Paramete r Strea m Analytica l Metho d

Moistur e Stac k Ga s EP A Metho d 4
Metal s Wast e Feeds , Spikin g Solutions , Stac

k Ga s ICPE S - SW-84 6 Method 6010 B CVAA S - Hg , SW-84 6 Metho d 7470 A o r 7471 A P M Stac k Ga s Gravimetri c - EP A Metho d 5 HCUC\ 2 Stac k Ga s IC-EP A Metho d 26 A Dioxins/Furan s Stac k Ga s HRGC/M S - SW-84 6 Metho d 8290 A Composition/Physica

l Parameter

s Wast

e Feed s EP A and/or AST M Standar d Method s



### 3-1 3

### 3.2. 1 Compositio n an d Physica l Parameters Analysi s Sample s o f

th e wast e feed s wil l be collecte dfo r determination o f

anumbe r o f chemical an dphysica l parameters . Sample s o f

th e wast e feed s wer

e analyze dfo r

th e followin g parameters , b y th e referenced standar

d methods :

• Ash-AST M Metho dAST M D-482 ;
• Total Chlorin e - SW-84 6 Method s 505 0 an d9056A ;
• Moisture - AST M Metho dE-20 3 o r D-4017(Karl-Fischer

titration) fo r

liqui dwaste , an dAST M Metho dD-514 2 or D-160. 3 (los s on drying ) fo r soli dwaste ;
• Calorifi c Valu e - AST M Metho dD-586 5 o r D-240 ;
• Densit y - AST M Metho dD-1475 ; an d

• Viscosity - AST M Metho dD-445 . 3.2. 2 Metal s Analysi s Wast e fee dsample s wer

e analyzedfo r

metal s usin g atrac e leve l inductivel y couple d argo n plasm aemissio n spectroscop

y (ICPES ) an

datomic absorptio n spectroscopy . Sample s wer e prepare d fo r analysi s usin g SW-84 6 Metho d3050B . Th e metal s analyzedb y ICPE S (SW-84 6 Metho d6010B ) ar

e arsenic (As) , berylliu m(Be) , cadmiu m(Cd) , chromium(Cr) , an dlea d(Pb)
. Mercur y (Hg ) wa s analyzedusing Metho d7471 A o f SW-846 . Spikin g solution s o f chromium an dmercur y wer e analyzedfo r

chromiu mandmercury , respectively
. Th e Metho d2 9 sampling train use d t o collec t sample s o f

th e stac k ga s fo r metal s wa s analyzedusing ICPE S according t o SW-84 6 Metho d6010

B fo r arsenic (As) , berylliu m(Be) , cadmiu m(Cd) , chromium(Cr) , an dlea d(Pb) , an dmercur y wa s analyzedusing Metho d7470 A o f SW-846 . 3.2. 3 P M Analysi s The P M concentration o f

th e stac k ga s wa s determine

d followin g 4 0 CF R60 , Appendi x A , Metho d5 protocols
. The was h fro mth e nozzle , prob e liner , an

dglasswar

e prio r t o th e filte r (PNR ) ofth e sampling trai n wa s evaporated , an

dth e mas s determined on a

n analytica

l balance
. Ti e filte r recovered fro mth

e samphn g trai n was desiccated , an dweighedt

o determin

e th e mas s o f particulat

e o n th e filter
. Th

e combinedmas s fro mth

e filte r andth e evaporate

d was h ar e use d wit h th e tota l volum e o f ga s sample dt o determin

e th e particulat

e loading
. 3.2. 4 HCI/CI 2 

### Analysi s Th e sulfuri c aci dan

dsodiu mhydroxide impinge

r catche s an

drinse s fro mth

e Modifie d Metho d26 A sampling train s wer e analyze dfo r

chloride io n concentration s usin g th e analytical
3-1 4

### approac h specifie di n Metho d26A . Th e Modifie dMetho d26 A samplin g train wa s recovered t o provide arins e o f

th e transfe r lin e an d content s an d rinse s o f

th e acidi c impingers (an

d knockou t impinger ) fo r determinatio

n o f hydroge n chloride ; an

d th e content s an d rinse s o f

th e alkalin e impingers fo r

determinatio

n o f chlorine
. Bot

h wer e analyzed fo r

chloride b y io n chromatograph y (IC ) fo r determinatio

n o f chloride
. Th

e chlorid e foun di n th

e aci dimpingers (an

d rinses ) i s reported a s HCI , an d th e chlorid e determine

d i n th e alkalin e impinger s (an

d rinses ) i s reported a

s Ch
. Sodiu mthiosulfat

e wa s adde d t o th e collecte d alkalin e impinge r sample s i n th

e analytical laborator y befor e analysis
. 3.2. 5 Dioxins/Furan s Analysi s Sample s ofth e stac

k ga s wer e collecte dusin g SW-84 6 Metho d0023A , an d wer e analyzedfo r

dioxins/furan s using SW-84 6 Metho d8290A , hig h resolutio n ga s chromatograph

y (HRGC ) wit

h hig h resolutio n mas s spectroscop y (HRMS ) analytica

l technique
. Th

e analytical protoco l include s quantitatio n o f al l dibenzodioxin s an

d dibenzofuran s includin g four or mor e chlorin e atoms . Th

e method provide s congene r clas s definitio n fo r

eac h o f th e fiv e congene

r group s (tetra- , penta- , hexa- , hepta- , an d octa-) . I n addition , each individual isome r containin g th e 2,3,7,8-substitution patter n wa s individuall y quantified
. Dioxins/furan s concentration s ar e reported for :

• Combinatio n o f

th e filte r an d al l th e rinse s betwee

n th e nozzl e an

d filter ; an

d
• Combinatio n o f

th e sorben t and al l th e rinse s betwee

n th e filte r an d sorbent
. 3.3 Proces s Monitorin g Procedure s Th e incinerato

r system s ar e monitored t

o ensur e operation i s i n accordance wit h th e pennitte d conditions
. Durin g th e performanc e test, th

e automatic wast

e fee d cutof

f system s wer e operational ; however, AWFC O limit s i n th e curren t NO C wer

e adjusted or

disable ddurin g th e performanc e testin

g period s t

o allo w targe

t operation s t

o b e achieved
. The CP T Pla

n prescribe d a Continuou s Monitorin g Syste mPerformanc e Evaluatio n Tes t fo r eac h o f th e thre e incinerators
. The Continuou s Monitorin g Syste mPerformanc e Evaluatio n Tes t Reports (CMSPETR ) fo r the thre e incinerator s ar

e include da

s Appendi x D . The ra

w proces s monitorin g dat afro mth e CP T testin g o f eac h o f th e thre e incinerators ar

e presente d i n Appendi x C .

3-1 5
VES01772 9

## 4. 0 Result s Thi s section present

s th e result s o f

th e comprehensive performanc e tes t o f Veolia' s incinerators a

t Sauget . Th

e analytica

l result s fo r

th e wast e fee dstream

s an dstac k ga s ar e presente d i n Section s 4. 1 an

d4.2 . Th e collectio n o f

sample s andth

e method s use dfo r samplin g an d analysi s ar

e specifie di n th

e CP T Plan an

dQAPjP
. Not e tha t value s presente

d i n these table s (an

dthroughou

t th e report ) ar e roundedt

o displa y a n appropriat

e leve l o f significance
. Al l calculation s ar e don e wit h unrounde

dvalues , an d therefore , i t

ma y no t b e possibl e t

o reproduc e acalculate dvalu e exactl y fro mth e dat ashown i n atable
. I

t ma y be necessar

y t o g o t o earlie r tables , o r th e ra w dat ai n th e appendices , t

o reproduce acalculate d value exactly
. 4.1 Waste Feedstream s Fou r wast e stream s wer e sampledandanalyzedi n bot h th e firs t par t an dth e secon dpar t o f eac h ru n o f th e CP T test

s o f Unit s 2 an

d3 , thre e liqui dwast

e stream s an don e soli dwast

e stream . Al l ar

e fe dt o th e primar y combustio n chambe

r (PCC) . Th e stream

s sample dan d analyzedare :

• Low-Btu Liqui dWaste ;
• Hig h Bt

u Liqui dWaste ;
• Liqui d(Specialty ) Waste ; and
• Containerize dSoli dWaste . Fiv e wast e stream s wer e sampledan

danalyzedi n bot

h the firs t par t an dth e secon dpar t o f each ru n o f

th e CP T tes t o f Uni t 4 , thre e liqui dwast

e stream s an dtw o soli dwast

e stream s includin g tw o liqui dwastes an d tw o soli dwaste s tha

t wer e fe dto th e kil n (i.e. , th

e primar y combustion chambe

r - PCC) , an

don e liqui dwast

e tha t wa s fe dto th e secondar

y combustion chambe r (SCC) . Th

e stream s sampledan

danalyze dare :

• Low-Bt

u Liqui dWast

e t o Kiln ;
• Hig h Bt

u Liqui dWast

e t o Kiln ;
• Containerize d Soli dWaste ;
• Bul k Soli dWaste ; an

d
• Liqui dWast

e t o th e SCC . Composit e sample s wer

e prepare do f th e sample s collecte ddurin g eac h ofth e Metho d5 sampling tim

e i n th e firs t par t o f eac h test, an dth e Modifie dMetho d26A , Metho d29 , an d
4- 1

### Metho d0023 A sampling time s o f th e secon d par t o f eac h test . Al l ofth e composit e liqui d wast e fee d samples fro mth

e first par t an d th e secon d par t o f th e CP T test

s wer e analyzed fo r ash , tota l chlorine , hea

t content , moisture , density , an

dviscosity
. Al l o f

th e composit

e soli d wast e fee d sample s fro mth

e first par t an d th e secon d par t o f th e CP T test

s wer e analyzed fo r ash , tota l chlorine , hea

t content , an dmoisture
. The composit e liqui dan

d soli dwast

e fee d samples collecte ddurin

g th e Metho d2

9 stac k samplin g wer e als o analyzedfo r

metal s (arsenic , beryllium , chromium , cadmium , lead , an d mercury) . Eac h sampl

e wa s given aunique lo g numbe r tha t identifie s th

e project an d unit , run nurnber, an

d a n identificatio n cod

e base d upon th e sampl e type an d fraction
. A n exampl

e ofth e lo g numbe

r forma t follows : Proj-XY-AB C Where : Pro

j i s aproject

specifi c identification ; X Y represen

t th e conditio n an

d ru n number ; an

d AB C i s a n alphanumeric sequenc

e describin g th

e particula

r sample
. Her e i s adescriptio n o f

th e sampl e code s used fo r

th e wast e sample s i n th

e CPT . VS 2 (Veoli aSauge

t an d uni t numbe r 2 , 3 , o r 4 ) - Strea

mCod e - Test Condition/Ru n Number/Par t A o r B - Sampl

e Descriptio n Strea m Codes : LW F = Liqui dWast

e Fee d (t o SC C Uni t

4 ) HB W = High-Btu Liqui dWast e (t o Kil n Uni t

4 ) LB W = Low-Btu Liqui dWast e (t o Kil n Uni t

4 ) C S = Containerize dSolid s (solid s materia l sampled fro mth

e box containers ) B S = Bul k

Solid s (Uni t

4 only ) C L Chlorin e Spikin g Material (sample s o f th e chlorine spikin g materia l fro mth e bo x containers ) P B = LeadSpikin g Material (sample s o f th e lead salts contained i n th e bo x containers ) H G = Mercur

y Spikin g Material (sample s o f th e vial s containin g th

e mercur y spikin g solutio n i n th

e box containers ) C R Chromiu mSpikin g Solutio n

4- 2
VES01773 1

### Tes tCondition/Ru

n Number/Par

tA o r B : Test Conditio n i s "1 " fo r

al l sample s an

dal l runs . Ru n Number

s typicall y ar

e 1,2, & 3 , howeve

r additiona

l run s performe d t

o replac e aborte d and/o r repeate d run s continue i n sequence , 4 , 5 , etc . Par t A refer s t

o th e tes t segmen t associate dwit h th e P M emission s testin

g (i.e. , th e firs t par t o f th e test) . Par t B refer s t

o th e tes t segmen t associated wit

h th e HCI /CI2 , Metals , an

d Dioxins/Furan s emission s testing (i.e. , th e secon d par t o f th e test) . Sampl e Description ; Wast e an d spikin g materia

l sample s include dindividua l gra b sample s fo r archiving , an

d composit

e sample s specifi c to eac h emission s tes

t period
. These ar e labele d a

s follows : Individua l gra b sample s ar

e labele dwit

h th e suffi x as : -Gra b 1 , -Gra b 2 , -Gra b 3 , etc . i n sequentia

l order
. Composit e sample s wer

e collecte ddurin g eac

h emission s samplin g perio d and ar e represente

d b y th e followin g I D suffix : COMP 1 = Composit

e sampl e collecte ddurin g th

e P M emission s tes t perio d COMP2 A = Composit

e sampl e collecte ddurin g th

e HCI /CI 2 emission s tes t perio d COMP2 B = Composit

e sampl e collecte d durin g th

e Metal s emission s tes t perio d COMP2 C = Composit

e sampl e collecte ddurin g th

e dioxins/furan s emission s tes

t perio d Not e tha t ther e shoul d not

be an y COMP2A , B , o r

C sample s labele d wit

h a"

- xxA- " run number

, no r shoul dther

e be an y COMP 1 sample s wit

h a"-xxB- " ru n number
. Examples : VS2-HBW-15B-Grab 4 i s th e 4 t h

### gra b sampl e o f High-Btu liqui dwast

e collecte d fo r archiv e durin g Ru n 5-Par t B o n Uni t 2 . VS3-LWF-12A-COMP 1 i s th e composit

e sampl e o f th e liqui dwast

e fee d collecte d fo r

analysi s durin g P M emission s Ru n 2 tes t perio d (Par

t A ) o n Uni t 3 . Tabl e 4- 1 present

s th e analytica

l result s fo r

chlorine , ash , metals , hea t content , moisture , density , an

d viscosit y i n th e Low-Btu Liqui dWast

e fe d t o Uni t 2 . Tabl e 4- 2 present

s th e analytica

l result s fo r

chlorine , ash , metals , hea t content , moisture , density , an

d viscosit y i n th e High-Bt u Liqui dWast

e fe dt o Uni t 2 .

4- 3
VES01773 2

### Tabl e 4- 3 present s th e analytica

l result s fo r

chlorine , ash , metals , hea t content , moisture , density , an

d viscosit y i n th e Specialt y Liqui dWast

e fe dt o Uni t 2 . Tabl e 4- 4 present s th e analytica

l result s fo r

chlorine , ash , metals , hea t content, an

d moistur e i n th e Containerize dSoli dWast e fe dt o Uni t 2 . Tabl e 4- 5 present

s th e analytica

l results fo r

chlorine , ash , metals , hea t content, moisture , density , an

d viscosit y i n th e Low-Btu Liqui dWast

e fe dt o Uni t 3 . Tabl e 4- 6 present

s th e analytica

l results fo r

chlorine , ash , metals , hea t content , moisture , density , an

d viscosit y i n th e High-Btu Liqui dWast

e fe dt o Uni t 3 . Tabl e 4-7 present

s th e analytica

l result s fo r

chlorine , ash , metals , hea t content, moisture , density , an

d viscosit y i n th e Specialt y Liqui dWast

e fe dt o Uni t 3 . Tabl e 4- 8 present

s th e analytica

l result s fo r

chlorine , ash , metals , hea t content, an

d moistur e i n th e Containerize dSoli dWast e fe dt o Uni t 3 . Tabl e 4-9 present

s th e analytica

l result s fo r

chlorine , ash , metals , hea t content, moisture , density , an

d viscosit y i n th e Low-Btu Liqui dWast

e fe dt o th e kil n (PCC ) o f

Uni t 4 . Tabl e 4-1 0 present

s th e analytica

l result s fo r

chlorine , ash , metals , hea t content , moisture , density , an

d viscosit y i n th e High-Bt u Liqui dWast

e fe dt o th e kil n (PCC ) o f

Uni t 4 . Tabl e 4-1 1 present

s th e analytica

l result s fo r

chlorine , ash , metals , hea t content , moisture , density , an

d viscosit y i n th e Liqui dWast

e fe dt o th e SC C o f Uni t 4 . Table 4-1 2 present

s th e analytica

l result s fo r

chlorine , ash , metals , hea t content, an

d moistur e i n th e Containerize dSoli dWast e fe dt o Uni t 4 . Tabl e 4-1 3 present

s th e analytica

l result s fo r

chlorine , ash , metals , hea t content , an d moistur e i n th e Bul k Soli dWast

e fe dt o Uni t 4 . Th e detailed analytica

l reports ar

e presente d i n Appendi x Gl
.

4-4
VES01773 3Tabl e 4-1 . Uni t 2 - Analytica l Result s fo r Chlorine , Ash , Metals , an d Physica l Parameter s i n th e Low-Bt u Liqui d Waste Fee d Analytica

l Paramete

r Unit s Run l Ru n 2 Ru n 3 Run 5 Analytica

l Paramete

r Unit s 1 P M 2 A HC1/CI 2 2 B

Metal s 2 C Dioxins / Furan s 1 P M 1 P M 2 A HCI/C1 2 2 B

Metal s 2 C Dioxins / Furan s 2 A HC1/C1 2 2 B

Metal s 2 C Dioxins / Furan s Chlorin e mg/kg 34 5 34 0 34 7 36 3 34 6 37 4 40 4 36 4 39 3 34 0 35 7 37 2 As h mg/kg 3,14 0 2,94 0 2,97 0 2,99 0 2,96 0 3,25 0 3,860 3,18 0 3,13 0 3,13 0 3,100 2,94 0 Arseni c mg/kg N A N A 2. 7 N A N A N A N A 3. 2 N A N A 2. 1 N A Berylliu m mg/kg N A N A <0.097 N A N A N A N A <0.09 6 N A N A <0.09 7 N A Cadmiu m mg/kg N A N A 7. 2 N A N A N A N A 9. 0 N A N A 7. 0 N A Chromiu m mg/kg N A N A 0. 8 N A N A N A N A 0.8 8 N A N A 0.7 4 N A Lea d mg/kg N A N A 1. 1 N A N A N A N A 1. 7 N A N A 1. 1 N A Mercur y mg/kg N A N A 0.02 1 N A N A N A N A 0.04 2 N A N A 0.05 2 N A Percen t Wate r % 98. 1 98. 0 98. 2 98. 3 97. 9 98. 4 97. 5 96. 6 98. 2 99. 9 99. 0 99. 2 Heatin g Valu e Btu/l b <13 0 <13 0 <13 0 <13 0 <13 0 <13 0 <13 0 <13 0 <13 0 <13 0 17 8 <13 0 Densit y g/m 3 1.00 0 1.00 0 1.00

0 1.00

0 0.99 9 1.00

0 0.99 9 1.00

0 1.00

0 0.99 9 1.00

0 1.00

0 Viscosit y cS t 0.93 4 0.93 9 0.93 0 0.93 4 0.93 0 0.93 0 0.93 2 0.93 2 0.93 3 0.92 8 0.92 9 0.927



### 4- 5
VES01773 4Tabl e 4-2 . Uni t 2 - Analytica l Result s fo r Chlorine , Ash , Metals , an d Physica l Parameter s i n th e High-Bt u Liqui d Waste Fee d Analytica l Paramete r Unit s Run l Ru n 2 Ru n 3 Ru n 5 Analytica l Paramete r Unit s 1 P M 2 A HCI/C1 2 2 B

Metal s 2 C

Dioxins / Furan s 1

P M 1 P M 2 A HC1/C1 2 2 B

Metal s 2 C

Dioxins / Furan s 2 A

HCl/C k 2 B

Metal s 2 C

Dioxins / Furan s Chlorin e mg/k

g 7,07 0 6,96 0 7,14 0 7,24 0 7,18 0 3,78 0 3,26 0 3,21 0 3,33 0 3,500 3,58 0 3,45 0 As h mg/k

g 1,35 0 1,03 0 1,10 0 1,04

0 1,01 0 1,18

0 55 7 58 2 55 1 2,08 0 1,21 0 1,35 0 Arseni c mg/k

g N A N A 8. 3 N A N A N A N A 2. 8 N A N A <0.3 2 N A Berylliu m mg/k

g N A N A <0.09 6 N A N A N A N A <0.09 9 N A N A <0.09 6 N A Cadmiu m mg/kg N A N A <0.07 6 N A N A N A N A <0.07 8 N A N A <0.07 6 N A Chromiu m mg/kg N A N A 0.2 6 N A N A N A N A <0.2 2 N A N A <0.2 1 N A Lea d mg/kg N A N A 1. 0 N A N A N A N A 0.6 7 N A N A 6. 7 N A Mercury mg/k

g N A N A 0.02 6 N A N A N A N A 0.02 1 N A N A 0.09 6 N A Percen t Wate r % 22 . 1 21, 9 22. 1 21. 9 21. 8 20. 6 20. 0 20. 2 20. 3 27. 6 28. 1 27. 8 Heatin g Valu e Btu/l b 9,09 0 9,00 0 9,04 0 9,05 0 9,040 9,12 0 9,16 0 9,13 0 9,15 0 8,63 0 8,63 0 8,660 Densit y g/m 3 0.88 0 0.87 9 0.88 0 0.87 8 0.87 9 0.87 5 0.86 8 0.86 9 0.86 9 0.88 3 0.88 3 0.88 3 Viscosit y cS t 1.3 1 1.3 0 1.2

9 1.2

9 1.2

8 1.1 9 1.1 8 1.1 8 1.1 7 1.6 0 1.6

2 1.6

0



### 4- 6
VES01773 5Tabl e 4-3 . Uni t 2 - Analytica l Result s fo r Chlorine , Ash , Metals , an d Physica l Parameter s i n th e Specialty Liqui d Wast e Fee d
Analytica

l Paramete

r Unit

s Run l Ru n 2 Ru n 3 Run 5 Analytica

l Paramete

r Unit

s 1 P M 2

A HC1/C1 2 2

B Metal s 2 C Dioxins / Furan s 1 P M 1

P M 2

A HC1/C1 2 2

B Metal s 2 C Dioxins /
, _Furan s 2 A HCI/C1 2 2

B Metal s 2 C Dioxins / Furan s Chlorin e mg/k g 91. 8 10 5 15 9 15 6 14 0 11 1 13 0 12 4 13 0 10 6 92. 4 10 8 As h mg/k g 64 9 60 0 57 5 1,01 0 59 9 59 8 65 7 59 2 57 9 90 4 83 2 83 2 Arseni c mg/k g N A N A <0.3 2 N A N A N A N A <0. 3 N A N A <0.3 1 N A Berylliu m mg/k g N A N A <0.09 6 N A N A N A N A <0.09 2 N A N A <0.09 3 N A Cadmiu m mg/k g N A N A <0.07 6 N A N A N A N A <0.07 3 N A N A <0.07 3 N A Chromiu m mg/k g N A N A <0.2 1 N A N A N A N A <0. 2 N A N A <0. 2 N A Lea d mg/k g N A N A <0.2 7 N A N A N A N A <0.2 6 N A N A <0.2 6 N A Mercur y mg/k g N A N A <0.00 9 N A N A N A N A <0.008 6 N A N A <0.009 9 N A Percen t Wate r % 98. 1 98. 2 98. 2 99. 0 98. 8 98. 4 98. 5 98. 7 98. 3 101. 0 101. 0 100. 0 Heatin g Valu e Btu/l b <13 0 <13 0 <13 0 <13 0 <13 0 <13 0 <13 0 <13 0 <13 0 <13 0 <13 0 <13 0 Densit y g/m 3 0.99 8 0.99 8 0.99 9 1.00 0 0.99 7 0.99 8 0.99 7 0.99 7 0.99 7 0.99 7 0.99 8 0.99 8 Viscosit y cS t 0.89 7 0.89 4 0.89 4 0.89 6 0.89 7 0.90 0 0.89 5 0.89 7 0.89 7 0.90 6 0.90 7 0.9 1



### 4-7
VES01773 6Tabl e 4-4 . Uni t 2 - Analytica l Result s fo r Chlorine , Ash , Metals , an d Physica l Parameter

s i n th e Containerize d Solid s Waste Fee d
Analytica

l Paramete

r Unit

s Run l Run 2 Run 3 Run 5 Analytica

l Paramete

r Unit

s 1 P M 2 A

HC1/C1 2 2 B

Metal s 2 C Dioxins / Furan s 1 P M 1

P M 2 A

HCI/C1 2 2 B

Metal s 2 C Dioxins / Furan s 2 A HCVOz 2 B

Metal s 2 C Dioxins / Furans Chlorin e mg/k g 28 8 18 4 16 7 23 7 28 4 43 3 34 5 49 9 26 7 34 6 39 6 35 1 As h mg/k g 675,00 0 785,00 0 708,00 0 676,00 0 688,00 0 655,00 0 657,00 0 634,00 0 637,00 0 732,00 0 688,00 0 703,00 0 Arseni c mg/k g N A N A 8. 8 N A N A N A N A 7. 5 N A N A 8. 8 N A Berylliu m mg/k g N A N A 0.4 8 N A N A N A N A 0.6 1 N A N A 0.7 3 N A Cadmiu m mg/k g N A N A 0.08 2 N A N A N A N A <0.07 7 N A N A 0.08 4 N A Chromiu m mg/k g N A N A 12. 8 N A N A N A N A 19. 3 N A N A 16. 7 N A Lea d mg/k g N A N A 11. 6 N A N A N A N A 11. 7 N A N A 13. 5 N A Mercur y mg/k g N A N A 0.04 5 N A N A N A N A 0.02 2 N A N A 0.01 6 N A Percen t Wate r % 20. 2 23. 4 21. 7 24. 5 26. 2 24. 9 25. 2 25. 1 25. 1 22. 6 25. 4 20. 8 Heatin g Valu e Btu/l b <13 0 <13 0 <13 0 <13 0 <13 0 <13 0 <13 0 <13 0 <13 0 <13 0 <13 0 <13 0 Densit y g/m 3 N A N A N A N A N A N A N A N A N A N A N A N A Viscosit y cS t N A N A N A N A N A N A N A N A N A N A N A N A



### 4- 8 VES01773 7Tabl e 4-5 . Uni t 3 - Analytica l Result s fo r Chlorine , Ash , Metals , an d Physica l Parameter s i n th e Low-Bt u Liqui d Waste Fee d Analytica l Paramete r Unit s Run l R u n 2 R u n 3 R o n 4 Analytica l Paramete r Unit s 1 P M 1 P M 2 A HC1/CI 2 2 B

Metal s 2 C

Dioxins / Furan s 1

P M 2 A HC1/C1 2 2 B

Metal s 2 C

Dioxins / Furan s 2 A

HC1/C1 2 2 B

Metal s 2 C

Dioxins / Furan s Chlorin e mg/k g 40 9 44 0 56 3 41 9 40 8 42 7 40 9 42 9 40 0 38 8 40 8 42 4 As h mg/k g 3,09 0 4,07 0 4,86 0 3,70 0 3,28 0 3,65 0 3,20 0 3,20 0 3,00 0 2,94 0 3,46 0 3,10 0 Arseni c mg/k g N A N A N A 4. 8 N A N A N A 3. 2 N A N A 3. 3 N A Berylliu m mg/k g N A N A N A <0.09 6 N A N A N A <0.09 7 N A N A <0.09 6 N A Cadmiu m mg/k g N A N A N A 15. 2 N A N A N A 9. 4 N A N A 11. 3 N A Chromiu m mg/k g N A N A N A 1. 3 N A N A N A 0.8 7 N A N A 0.9 7 N A Lea d mg/k g N A N A N A 3. 1 N A N A N A 1. 9 N A N A 1. 9 N A Mercur y mg/k g N A N A N A 0.06 5 N A N A N A 0.04 9 N A N A 0.0 8 N A Percen t Wate r % 101. 0 99. 8 99. 3 99. 8 100. 0 98. 2 99. 3 100. 0 99. 2 99. 7 99. 5 99. 9 Heatin g Valu e Btu/l b <13 0 17 3 36 1 25 6 15 8 46 2 20 9 18 1 21 3 15 4 <13 0 13 2 Densit y g/m 3 1.00 0 1.00 0 1.00 0 1.00 0 0.99 9 1.00 0 1.00 0 1.00 0 1.00 0 1.00 0 1.01 0 1.00 0 Viscosit y cS t 0.93 2 0.93 1 0.93 3 0.93 2 0.93 5 0.93 5 0.94 0 0.93 3 0.93 7 0.93 5 0.93 2 0.93 4



### 4- 9 VES01773 8Tabl e 4-6 . Uni t 3 - Analytica l Result s fo r Chlorine , Ash , Metals , an d Physica l Parameter s i n th e High-Bt u Liqui d Waste Fee d
Analytica

l Paramete

r Unit

s Run l Run 2 Run 3 Run 4 Analytica

l Paramete

r Unit

s 1 P M 1

P M 2

A HC1/C1 3 2

B Metal s 2 C Dioxins / Furan s 1 P M 2

A HC1/C1 2 2

B Metal s 2 C Dioxins / Furan s 2 A HC1/C1 2 2

B Metal s 2 C Dioxins / Furan s Chlorin e mg/k g 3,45 0 2,41 0 2,46 0 2,72 0 2,43 0 1,73 0 1,69 0 1,65 0 1,62 0 1,91 0 1,81 0 1,83 0 As h mg/k g 1,26 0 93 7 1,10 0 1,16 0 73 0 59 9 47 8 58 6 64 8 73 4 69 3 73 0 Arseni c mg/k g N A N A N A 12. 4 N A N A N A 1. 7 N A N A 2. 4 N A Berylliu m mg/k g N A N A N A <0.09 5 N A N A N A <0. 1 N A N A <0.09 6 N A Cadmiu m mg/k g N A N A N A <0.07 5 N A N A N A <0.07 9 N A N A <0.07 6 N A Chromiu m mg/k g N A N A N A <0.2 1 N A N A N A <0.2 2 N A N A <0.2 1 N A Lea d mg/k g N A N A N A 1. 8 N A N A N A 1. 0 N A N A 1. 3 N A Mercur y mg/k g N A N A N A 0.02 7 N A N A N A 0.02 9 N A N A 0.02 2 N A Percen t Wate r % 24. 0 23. 9 23. 9 24. 1 24. 0 23. 3 23. 0 23. 0 23. 1 25. 2 25. 2 25. 4 Heatin g Valu e Btu/l b 8,68 0 8,82 0 8,70 0 8,70 0 8,80 0 8,84 0 8,87 0 8,79 0 8,86 0 8,55 0 8,62 0 8,56 0 Densit y g/m 3 0.87 9 0.87 8 0.87 7 0.87 7 0.87 8 0.87 4 0.87 4 0.87 3 0.87 4 0.87 9 0.87 9 0.88 0 Viscosit y cS t 1.3 3 1.3 0 1.3 0 1.3 1 1.3 0 1.2 8 1.2 6 1.27 1.2 6 1.3 5 1.3 5 1.3 6



### 4-1 0 VES01773 9Tabl e 4-7 . Uni t 3 - Analytica l Result s fo r Chlorine , Ash , Metals , an d Physica l Parameter s i n th e Specialt

y Liqui d Waste Fee d
Analytica l Paramete r Unit s Run l R u n 2 R u n 3 R u n 4 Analytica l Paramete r Unit s 1 P M 1

P M 2 A HC1/CI 2 2 B

Metal s 2 C

Dioxins / Furan s 1

P M 2 A HC1/C1 2 2 B

Metal s 2 C

Dioxins / Furan s 2 A

HC1/C1 2 2 B

Metal s 2 C

Dioxins / Furan s Chlorin e mg/k g 18 8 17 4 1,48 0 69 6 58 7 11 1 10 1 12 5 11 2 11 3 12 7 9 2 As h mg/k g 59 1 62 2 91 7 71 3 73 3 58 8 52 0 52 0 52 1 64 8 62 0 60 6 Arseni c mg/k g N A N A N A <0.3 2 N A N A N A <0.3 2 N A N A <0.3 3 N A Berylliu m mg/k g N A N A N A <0.09 8 N A N A N A <0.09 6 N A N A <0.09 9 N A Cadmiu m mg/k g N A N A N A <0.07 7 N A N A N A <0.07 6 N A N A <0.07 8 N A Chromiu m mg/k g N A N A N A <0.2 2 N A N A N A <0.2 1 N A N A <0.2 2 N A Lea d mg/k g N A N A N A <0.2 7 N A N A N A <0.2 7 N A N A <0.2 8 N A Mercur y mg/k g N A N A N A <0.008 8 N A N A N A <0.009 4 N A N A <0.009 9 N A Percen t Wate r % 98. 4 97. 7 97. 3 98. 7 95. 8 97. 9 97. 2 98. 4 96. 2 97. 1 99. 2 97. 1 Heatin g Valu e Btu/l b <13 0 <13 0 <13 0 <13 0 <13 0 <13 0 <13 0 <13 0 <13 0 <13 0 <13 0 <13 0 Densit y g/m 3 0.99 8 1.00 0 1.00 0 0.99 9 1.00 0 0.99 9 0.99 7 0.99 7 0.99 8 1.00 0 1.00 0 1.00 0 Viscosit y cS t 0.90 1 0.90 4 0.89 8 0.90 3 0.89 7 0.89 7 0.89 9 0.90 1 0.89 9 0.89 8 0.89 8 0.89 7



### 4-1 1 VES01774 0Tabl e 4-8 . Uni t 3 - Analytica l Result s fo r Tota l Chlorine , Ash , Metals , an d Physica l Parameter

s i n th e Containerize d Solid s Waste Fee d Analytica

l Paramete

r Unit

s Run l Ru n 2 Run 3 Ru n 4 Analytica

l Paramete

r Unit

s 1 P M 1

P M 2

A HCl/Cl j 2 B Metal s 2 C Dioxins / Furan s 1

P M 2

A HC1/C1 2 2

B Metal s 2 C Dioxins / Furan s 2

A HCI /CI 2 2

B Metal s 2 C

Dioxins / Furan s Chlorin e mg/k g 25 3 22 9 48 2 19 5 12 9 34 7 11 5 27 1 20 4 38 2 25 5 29 7 As h mg/k g 670,00 0 682,00 0 663,00 0 775,00 0 737,00 0 778,00 0 655,00 0 715,00 0 682,00 0 721,00 0 686,00 0 698,00 0 Arseni c mg/k g N A N A N A 7. 5 N A N A N A 6. 4 N A N A 8. 4 N A Berylliu m mg/k g N A N A N A 0.5 8 N A N A N A 0.5 5 N A N A 0.7 9 N A Cadmiu m mg/k g N A N A N A <0.07 1 N A N A N A <0.07 6 N A N A <0.07 1 N A Chromiu m mg/k g N A N A N A 13. 6 N A N A N A 13. 7 N A N A 18. 9 N A Lea d mg/k g N A N A N A 11. 1 N A N A N A 10. 7 N A N A 14. 1 N A Mercur y mg/k g N A N A N A 0.02 8 N A N A N A 0.02 8 N A N A 0.02 6 N A Percen t Wate r % 18. 2 15. 8 22. 5 27. 4 22. 0 28. 7 20. 8 25. 0 19. 0 27. 5 24. 8 22. 6 Heatin g Valu e Btu/l b <13 0 <13 0 <13 0 <13 0 <13 0 <13 0 <13 0 <13 0 <13 0 <13 0 <13 0 <13 0 Densit y g/m 3 N A N A N A N A N A N A N A N A N A N A N A N A Viscosit y cS t N A N A N A N A N A N A N A N A N A N A N A N A

4-1 2 

### VES01774 1V Tabl e 4-9 . Uni t 4 - Analytica l Result s fo r Chlorine , Ash , Metals , an d Physica l Parameter

s i n th e Low-Bt u Liqui d Wast e Fee d t o th e Kil n Analytica

l Paramete

r Unit

s Run l Ru n 2 Ru n 3 Run 4 Analytica

l Paramete

r Unit

s 1 P M 2

A HC1/C1 2 2

B Metal s 2 C Dioxins / Furan s 2 A HCVCl

2 2 B Metal s 2 C Dioxins / Furan s 1 P M 2

A HCI/C1 2 2

B Metal s 2 C Dioxins / Furan s 1 P M Chlorin e mg/k g 47 2 41 6 41 3 44 9 46 7 39 3 42 2 53 7 48 6 53 2 43 9 53 0 As h mg/k g 2,79 0 2,91 0 3,10 0 2,57 0 3,06 0 3,26 0 2,94 0 3,32 0 3,22 0 2,63 0 3,26 0 3,25 0 Arseni c mg/k g N A N A 5. 5 N A N A 4. 9 N A N A N A 2. 9 N A N A Berylliu m mg/k g N A N A <0.09 4 N A N A <0.09 8 N A N A N A <0.09 6 N A N A Cadmiu m mg/k g N A N A 13. 6 N A N A 12. 1 N A N A N A 9. 4 N A N A Chromiu m mg/k g N A N A 1. 3 N A N A 1. 2 N A N A N A 0.8 4 N A N A Lea d mg/k g N A N A 3. 3 N A N A 2. 9 N A N A N A 1. 6 N A N A Mercur y mg/k g N A N A 0.1 1 N A N A 0.1 4 N A N A N A 0.1 1 N A N A Percen t Wate r % 98. 8 97. 3 97. 7 97. 0 96. 5 95. 8 97. 3 97. 1 98. 1 98. 6 96. 9 98. 8 Heatin g Valu e Btu/l b <13 0 <13 0 <13 0 <13 0 <13 0 15 7 16 6 <13 0 19 7 <13 0 28 3 40 2 Densit y g/m 3 0.99 9 1.00 0 1.00 0 0.99 9 0.99 9 1.00 0 1.00 0 1.00 0 1.00 0 0.99 9 1.00 0 0.99 9 Viscosit y cS t 0.93 4 0.93 9 0.92 9 0.93 3 0.92 8 0.93 3 0.92 9 0.93 2 0.93 0 0.93 2 0.93 2 0.93 2



### 4-1 3 VES01774 2Tabl e 4-10 . Uni t 4 - Analytica l Result s fo r Chlorine , Ash , Metals , an d Physica l Parameter

s i n th e High-Bt u Liqui d Wast e Fee d t o th e Kil n Analytica

l Paramete

r Unit

s Ru n 1 Ru n 2 Run 3 Ru n 4 Analytica

l Paramete

r Unit

s 1 P M 2

A HC1/CI 2 2 B Metal s 2 C Dioxins / Furan s 2 A HCI/C1 2 2

B Metal s 2 C Dioxins / Furan s 1 P M 2A HC1/C1 2 2

B Metal s 2 C Dioxins / Furan s 1 P M Chlorin e mg/k g 1,47 0 1,45 0 1,49 0 1,42 0 1,39 0 1,36 0 1,36 0 1,35 0 1,36 0 1,35 0 1,35 0 1,33 0 As h mg/k g 1,61 0 2,35 0 2,11 0 1,82 0 89 8 1,01 0 1,02 0 1,50 0 97 3 93 1 1,02 0 98 9 Arseni c mg/k g N A N A 1. 4 N A N A 0.3 7 N A N A N A <0.3 2 N A N A Berylliu m mg/k g N A N A <0.09 9 N A N A <0.09 3 N A N A N A <0.09 7 N A N A Cadmiu m mg/k g N A N A 0.1 2 N A N A <0.07 3 N A N A N A <0.07 7 N A N A Chromiu m mg/k g N A N A 0.2 4 N A N A <0. 2 N A N A N A <0.2 1 N A N A Lea d mg/k g N A N A 1. 1 N A N A 0. 4 N A N A N A <0.2 7 N A N A Mercur y mg/k g N A N A 0.04 8 N A N A 0.02 1 N A N A N A 0.01 8 N A N A Percen t Wate r % 24. 0 24. 3 24. 0 23. 8 25. 0 24. 9 24. 5 25. 2 24. 8 25. 1 24. 7 24. 8 Heatin g Valu e Btu/l b 8,74 0 8,70 0 8,69 0 8,75 0 8,78 0 8,76 0 8,73 0 8,76 0 8,79 0 8,75 0 8,78 0 8,81 0 Densit y g/m 3 0.87 6 0.87 7 0.87 6 0.87 7 0.87 7 0.87 7 0.87 7 0.87 7 0.87 7 0.87 8 0.87 7 0.87 7 Viscosit y cS t 1.2 9 1.2 8 1.2 8 1.2 9 1.3 7 1.3 7 1.3 7 1.3 8 1.3 6 1.3 7 1.3 6 1.3 6



### 4-1 4 VES01774 3Tabl e 4-11 . Uni t 4 - Analytica l Result s fo r Chlorine , Ash , Metals , an d Physica l Parameter

s i n th e Liqui d Wast

e Fee d t o th e SC C
Analytica

l Paramete

r Unit

s Run l Ru n 2 Run 3 Ru n 4 Analytica

l Paramete

r Unit

s 1 P M 2 A HC1 /CI 2 2 B

Metal s 2 C Dioxins / Furan s 2 A HCI/C1 2 2 B

Metal s 2 C Dioxins / Furan s 1 P M 2 A HC1/C1 2 2 B

Metal s 2 C Dioxins / Furan s 1 P M Chlorin e mg/k g 1,25 0 1,23 0 1,25 0 1,21 0 1,26 0 2,50 0 1,24 0 1,27 0 1,28 0 1,25 0 1,28 0 1,32 0 As h mg/k g 74 4 51 1 48 5 47 8 69 4 67 3 67 2 78 7 65 1 60 4 59 1 74 3 Arseni c mg/k g N A N A <0. 3 N A N A <0.3 2 N A N A N A <0.3 1 N A N A Berylliu m mg/k g N A N A <0.09 2 N A N A <0.09 8 N A N A N A <0.09 4 N A N A Cadmiu m mg/k g N A N A <0.07 3 N A N A <0.07 7 N A N A N A <0.07 4 N A N A Chromiu m mg/k g N A N A <0. 2 N A N A <0.2 2 N A N A N A <0.2 1 N A N A Lea d mg/k g N A N A 0.2 6 N A N A <0.2 7 N A N A N A <0.2 6 N A N A Mercur y mg/k g N A N A 0.01 7 N A N A 0.01 9 N A N A N A 0.01 7 N A N A Percen t Wate r % 27. 0 26. 5 26. 5 26. 2 26. 9 26. 7 27. 0 26. 8 26. 6 25. 6 26. 6 26. 9 Heatin g Valu e Btu/l b 8,83 0 8,81 0 8,79 0 8,81 0 8,76 0 8,80 0 8,76 0 8,78 0 8,86 0 8,86 0 8,87 0 8,83 0 Densit y g/m 3 0.87 9 0.87 8 0.87 8 0.87 8 0.87 9 0.87 8 0.87 7 0.87 9 0.87 7 0.87 8 0.87 8 0.87 8 Viscosit y cS t 1.5 4 1.5 2 1.5 2 1.5 2 1.5 3 1.5 2 1.5 2 1.5 2 1.5 2 1.5 2 1.5 1 1.5 2



### 4-1 5 VES01774 4Tabl e 4-12 . Uni t 4 - Analytica l Result s fo r Chlorine , Ash , Metals , an d Physica l Parameter

s i n th e Containerize d Solid s Wast e Fee d
Analytica

l Paramete

r Unit

s Run l Ru n 2 Run 3 Run 4 Analytica

l Paramete

r Unit

s 1 P M 2 A

HCl/Cl j 2 B Metal s 2 C Dioxins / Furan s 2 A HC1/C1 2 2 B

Metal s 2 C Dioxins / Furan s 1 P M 2 A

HCI/CI 2 2 B Metal s 2 C Dioxins / Furan s 1 P M Chlorin e mg/k g 17 6 19 2 19 0 16 7 20 5 20 1 25 7 22 7 20 7 18 0 27 1 24 4 As h mg/k g 758,00 0 828,00 0 739,00 0 728,00 0 728,00 0 731,00 0 745,00 0 724,00 0 749,00 0 730,00 0 719,00 0 771,00 0 Arseni c mg/k g N A N A 2. 4 N A N A 2. 0 N A N A N A 2. 1 N A N A Berylliu m mg/k g N A N A 0.1 3 N A N A 0.1 6 N A N A N A <0. 1 N A N A Cadmiu m mg/k g N A N A 0.4 6 N A N A 0.4 3 N A N A N A 0.4 5 N A N A Chromiu m mg/k g N A N A 45. 2 N A N A 58. 9 N A N A N A 35. 1 N A N A Lea d mg/k g N A N A 35. 9 N A N A 21 2 N A N A N A 25. 4 N A N A Mercur y mg/k g N A N A 0.1 8 N A N A 0.2 4 N A N A N A 0.2 6 N A N A Percen t Wate r % 7.6 4 8.1 0 6.7 5 9.1 0 7.9 3 8.2 9 7.8 2 9.8 8 8.1 1 7.9 4 9.3 1 6.3 1 Heatin g Valu e Btu/l b <13 0 <13 0 <13 0 <13 0 <13 0 <13 0 <13 0 <13 0 <13 0 <13 0 <13 0 <13 0 Densit y g/m 3 N A N A N A N A N A N A N A N A N A N A N A N A Viscosit y cS t N A N A N A N A N A N A N A N A N A N A N A N A



### 4-1 6 VES01774 5\ / Tabl e 4-13 . Uni t 4 - Analytica l Result s fo r Chlorine , Ash , Metals , an d Physica l Parameter s i n th e Bul k

Solid s Wast

e Fee d
Analytica

l Paramete

r Unit

s Run l Ru n 2 Ra n 3 Run 4 Analytica

l Paramete

r Unit

s 1 P M 2

A HCI / a 2 2

B Metal s 2 C Dioxins / Furan s 2 A HC1/C1 2 2

B Metal s 2 C Dioxins / Furan s 1 P M 2

A HC1/C1 2 2

B Metal s 2 C Dioxins / Furan s 1 P M Chlorin e mg/k g 17 1 18 4 21 9 26 5 25 7 24 3 23 6 19 3 19 1 17 3 18 2 16 4 As h mg/k g 695,00 0 646,00 0 715,00 0 784,00 0 770,00 0 720,00 0 674,00 0 689,00 0 729,00 0 737,00 0 695,00 0 710,00 0 Arseni c mg/k g N A N A 2. 2 N A N A 3. 0 N A N A N A 2. 2 N A N A Berylliu m mg/k g N A N A 0.2 1 N A N A 0.2 8 N A N A N A 0.2 6 N A N A Cadmiu m mg/k g N A N A 0.2 8 N A N A 0.3 7 N A N A N A 0.3 0 N A N A Chromiu m mg/k g N A N A 35. 6 N A N A 37. 9 N A N A N A 29. 8 N A N A Lea d mg/k g N A N A 41. 0 N A N A 58. 1 N A N A N A 26. 6 N A N A Mercur y mg/k g N A N A 0.08 2 N A N A 0.1 2 N A N A N A 0.07 7 N A N A Percen t Wate r % 14. 2 18. 8 10. 3 11. 6 16. 6 19. 2 19. 9 13. 3 19. 3 17. 3 15. 6 24. 7 Heatin g Valu e Btu/l b <13 0 <13 0 <13 0 <13 0 <13 0 <13 0 <13 0 <13 0 <13 0 <13 0 <13 0 <13 0 Densit y g/m 3 N A N A N A N A N A N A N A N A N A N A N A N A Viscosit y cS t N A N A N A N A N A N A N A N A N A N A N A N A



### 4-1 7 VES01774 6

### 4.2 Stac k Ga s Sample s o f

stac k ga s wer e collecte dfo r

deterrnination o f

th e followin g analytica

l parameters :

• PM ;
• HC1/C1 2 ; 

### • Metals ; an

d • Dioxins/Furans
. The stac k ga s concentration o f

th e tes t parameter

s reported a

s th e average o f

thre e tes t runs ar e used t o documen

t compliance
. Stac

k ga s concentration fo r

aparamete

r ma y include analytica l results fo r

multipl e components . Fo

r th e determination o f

stac k ga s concentration measure d i n a n individual sample , o r

run , fo r thos e samplin g system

s a s applicabl e (othe

r tha n SW-84 6 Metho d0023A) , th e followin g convention i s use d t o su mth e results o f

multipl e analyses :

• I n cases wher

e al l analytica

l results ar

e hit s (i.e. , no

t "non-detects") , al l analytica l results wil l b

e summed
. • In cases wher

e al l analytica

l results ar

e "non-detects, " al l method detection limit s wil l b e summed, an

d th e summe d resul t reporte d a s amaximum("<") . • I n cases wher

e on e o r mor e analytica

l results ar

e hits , an d on e o r mor e analytica

l result s ar e "non-detects, " th

e hit s an d th e "non-detects " wil l b

e summe d an d reported a s amaximu

m("<") . Exampl e calculation s o f

th e HW C MAC T emissio n limit s fo r PM , HC1/C1 2 

### , metals , dioxins/furans , an

d TH C showing th

e calculation s performe d fo r areported resul

t ar e presente d followin g th

e respective table
. 4.2. 1 P M i n Stac k

Ga s Stack ga s sample s fo r

determination o f

P M wer e collecte daccording to EP A Metho d5 . Thes e sample s wer

e analyzedgravimetricall y fo r P M accordin g t

o EP A Metho d5 . Tw o sample s wer e recovered fro meac

h train fo r th e determination o f

PM . The y wer e a s follows :

• A n aceton

e rins e o f th e prob e an

d nozzl e (PNR) , and ;
• Filte r (FILT) .

4-1 8

### Th e results fo r

P M ar e presente d i n Tabl e 4-1 4 fo r

Uni t 2 , Tabl e 4-1 5 fo r

Uni t 3 , an d Tabl e 4-1 6 fo r

Uni t 4 . The concentration o f

oxyge n measure d usin g CEM S an

d EP A Metho d3 A during th e collectio n o f

th e EP A Metho d5 sample s ar e show n i n th e tables , an

d th e concentration o f

P M i n th e stac k ga s corrected t

o 7 % 0 2

### i s shown
. Th e analytica

l result s fo r

th e determination o f

P M ar e include di n Appendi x G4 . Tabl e 4-14. Uni

t 2 - Result

s o f PM i n Stac k

Ga s Date Tim e Run l

10-8-1 3 11:50-13:0

0 Ru n 2

10-9-1 3 09:45-10:53 Ru n 3

10-10-1 3 09:15-10:2

3 Volum e Collecte d (dscf ) 40.81 5 4235 6 41.27 8 Oxyge n Concentratio n (% ) 11.56 11.2 3 11.4

8 P M Foun d (mg

) Filte r <0. 5 <0.

5 <0.

5 Prob e an

d Nozzl e Rinse 1.0 5 0.8 0 0.5 5 Total <1.5 5 <1.

3 <1.0

5 Stack Ga s Loadin g Particulat

e Matte r (mg/dscf

) <0.03 8 <0.03 1 <0.02 5 Particulat

e Matte r (mg/dscm

) <1. 3 <1. 1 <0.9 0 Particulat

e Matte r (mg/dscm , correcte

d t o 7 % 0 2 ) <2.

0 <1.6 <1. 3 Particulat

e Matte r (gr/dscf

) <0.0005 9 <0.0004

7 <0.0003

9 Particulat

e Matte r (gr/dscf

, correcte

d t o 7 % 0 2 ) <0.0008 7 <0.0006

8 <0.0005

8 Particulat

e Matte r (gr/dscf

, correcte

d t o 7 % 0 2 ) <0.0007 1



### 4-1 9

### Particulate Matte r HWC MAC T Sampl e Calculation , gr/dsc f @ 7 % 0 2 

### Uni t 2 - Ru n 2

P M Stac k Concentratio

n (mg/dscf

) =

P M Stac k Concentratio

n (mg/dscf

) = Tota l Mas s Loadin g (mg ) Sampl e Volum e (dscf ) <1. 3 m g 42.35 6 dsc

f <0.03 1

P M Stac k Concentratio

n (gr/dscf

)

P M Stac k Concentratio

n (gr/dscf

) Stac

k Concentratio n X (mg/dscf

) <0.03 1 mg/dscf

X 0.0154 3 m g 1 grain 0.0154 3 m g 1 grain <0.0004 7

P M Stac k Concentratio

n (gr/dsc f <§ > 7 % 0 2 )

P M Stac k Concentratio

n (gr/dsc f @ 7% O J Stac k Concentratio n X (gr/dscf ) 0.000 6 gr/dscf

X (21 % -7% )

(21 % - Meas . 0 2 ) (21-7 ) (21-11.23 ) 0.0006 8

( > 

### 4-2 0
VES01774 9

### Tabl e 4-15 . Uni t 3 - Result

s o f PM i n Stac k

Ga s Dat e Tim e Run l

10-15-1 3 13:16-14:2

5 Ru n 2

10-16-1 3 11:15-12:2

5 Ru n 3

10-171 3 09:50-10:5

7 Volum e Collecte d (dscf ) 41.22

9 42.46 1 41.92 1 Oxyge n Concentratio n (% ) 12.8

7 133 8 11.7 4 Particulat e Matte r Foun d (mg ) Filte r 1.0 5 1.

3 1.1

5 Prob e an

d Nozzl e Rinse 1.9 5 1.

7 2.5 Total 3.0 0 3.0

0 3.6

5 Stack Ga s Loadin g - Front-Hal f Onl y Particulat

e Matte r (mg/dscf

) 0.072 8 0.070

7 0.087 1 Particulat

e Matte r (mg/dscm

) 2.5 7 2.5 0 3.0 7 Particulat

e Matte r (mg/dscm, correcte

d t o 7 % 0 2 ) 4.4

5 4.6 1 4.6 7 Particulat

e Matte r (gr/dscf

) 0.0011 2 0.0010 9 0.0013

4 Particulat

e Matte r (gr/dscf

, correcte

d t o 7 % O2 ) 0.0019 4 0.0020

2 0.0020

4 Particulat

e Matte r (gr/dscf

, correcte

d t o 7 % O2 ) 0.0020 0



### 4-2 1
VES01775 0

### Tabl e 4-16 . Uni t 4 - Result

s o f PM i n Stac k

Ga s Date Tim e Run l

10-23-1 3 09:30-10:4

2 Ru n 3

10-25-1 3 09:35-10:4

0 Ru n 4 10-25-1 3 10:50-11:5

5 Volum e CoUecte d (dscf ) 38.18 1 39.69 1 36.75 9 Oxyge n Concentratio n (% ) 12.2

2 12.4

8 12.1 1 Particulat e Matte r Foun d (mg ) Filte r 1.9 5 0.

5 <0.

5 Prob e an

d Nozzl e Rinse 2. 2 2.3

5 2.

4 Front-Hal f

Tota l 4.1 5 2.8 5 <2.

9 Stack Ga s Loadin g - Front-Hal f Onl y Particulat

e Matte r (mg/dscf

) 0.109 0.071 8 <0.07 9 Particulat

e Matte r (mg/dscm

) 3.8 4 2.5

4 <2.

8 Particulat

e Matte r (mg/dscm, correcte

d t o 7 % 0 2 ) 6.1 5 4.1 9 <4. 4 Particulat

e Matte r (gr/dscf

) 0.0016 8 0.0011 1 <0.0012 Particulat

e Matte r (gr/dscf

, correcte

d t o 7 % 0 2 ) 0.0026 9 0.0018

3 <0.001 9 Particulat

e Matte r (gr/dscf

, correcte

d t o 7 % 0 2 ) <0.002 1 

### 4.2. 2 HCI/CI 2 

### i n Stac k Ga s Stac k ga s samples fo r

determination o f

HC/C1 2

### wer

e collecte dusin g aModifie dMetho d 26A . Sample s wer

e analyzedfo r

th e chloride io n usin g I C accordin g t o EP A Metho d26A . Eac h train wa s recoveredint

o multipl e component

s fo r analysi s a

s follows :

• The first

tw o impingers , whic h contained0. 1 N sulfuri c aci d(ACIDIMP) ; an d
• Th e fourt h an dfifth impingers , whic h contained0. 1 N sodiumhydroxide (ALKIMP) . Th e result s fo r HC1/C1 2

### ar

e presente d i n Tabl e 4-1 7 fo r

Uni t 2 , Tabl e 4-1 8 fo r

Uni t 3 , an d Tabl e 4-1 9 fo r

Uni t 4 . Th e concentration o f

oxyge n measure d usin g CEM S an

dEP A Metho d3 A durin g th e secon dhal f o f th e ru n i s show n i n th e tables , an

dth e concentration o f

HC1/C1 2 

### convertedt

o chlorid e equivalents (C l ) an

dcorrectedt

o 7 % 0 2

### i s shown
. Th e analytica

l results fo r

th e determination o f

HC1/C1 2

### ar

e include di n Appendi x G4 .

4-2 2
VES01775 1

### Tabl e 4-17 . Uni t 2 - Result

s o f HCI/CI

2 

### i n Stac k Ga s
Dat e Tim e Run l

10-8-1 3 15:40-16:4

0 Ru n 3

10-10-1 3 12:30-13:30 Ru n 5 10-30-1 3 12:45-13:4

5 Volum e Collecte d (dscf ) 37.38

4 37.290 36.87 9 Oxyge n Concentratio n (% ) 10.0

8 10.3 8 10.50 Hydrogen Chlorid e 36,60 0 15,50

0 21,60

0 Chlorin e <16 0 <18

0 <18

0 Concentratio n (mg/dscf ) Hydrogen Chlorid e 0.97 9 0.41 6 0.58 6 Chlorin e <0.004 3 <0.004

8 <0.004

9 Concentratio n (chlorid e equivalents , ppmvd ) Hydrogen Chlorid e 22.8 9.6 8 13.6 Chlorin e <0.1 0 <0.1 2 <0.12 Tota l <2 3 <9.

8 <1

4 Concentratio n (chlorid e equivalents , ppmvd , correcte d t o 7 % 0 2 ) Total <2 9 <1

3 <1

8 Average <2 0



### 4-23
VES01775 2

### HCI/Cl z HWC MAC T Sampl e Calculation , ppmv d @ 7 % 0 2 Uni t 2-Ru n 2 Su m o f HC I Sampl e HC I Stac k Concentratio n (mg/dscf ) = Fraction Value s (ng ) X
_ HC I Stac k Concentratio n (mg/dscf ) = Sampl e Volume (dscf ) 15,50 0 n g 37.29 0 dsc f 

## lm

g 10'H g lm g 0.41 6 HC I Stac k Concentratio n (chloride equivalent

s ppmvd )

HC I Stac k Concentratio n (chloride equivalent

s ppmvd)

Cl 2Stac k Concentratio n (mg/dscf ) = Cl 2Stac k Concentratio n (mg/dscf ) Concentratio n (mg/dscf ) 28.31 7 L/cf 2 4 L/g-mo l Molecula r Weigh

to f HC I (g/g-mol ) 0.41 6 mg/dsc

f HC I 28.31 7 L/c

f 2 4 L/g-mo l 36. 5 g/g-mo

l Su m o f Cl 2Sampl

e Fractio n Value s (ng ) Sample Volum

e (dscf ) <18 0 n g 37.29 0 dsc f l g 10 3 m g 10 s ppmv

d 

## l g ltFm g 10 6

## ppmv d lm g 10 3 

### u g 

## lm g io 3 n g = 9.6 8

= <0.004

8 CI 2 Stac k Concentratio n (chloride equivalent

s ppmvd)

CI 2 Stac k Concentratio n (chlorid e equivalent

s ppmvd ) Concentration (mg/dscf ) 28.31 7 L/c

f 2 4 L/g-mo

l [Molecular Weigh

to f CI 2 (g/g-mol) ] /

2 Chlorid

e Equivalent

s <0.004 8 mg/dsc

f CI 2 28.31 7 L/cf 2 4 L/g-mo

l 35. 5 g/g-mo

l 

## l g 1 0 m g 10 6 ppmv

d


## l g 10 3 m g 10 6 ppmv

d = <0.1

2

Concentratio n (chloride equivalent s ppmvd) Concentration (chloride equivalent s ppmvd) HC

I Stac k Concentratio

n (chloride equivalent

s ppmvd ) 9.6 8 ppmv d CI 2 Stac k Concentration (chlorid e equivalent

s ppmvd ) <0.1 2 ppmv d <9.

8

Concentratio n (ppmv

d @ 7 % 02 ) = Concentratio n (ppmv

d @ 7% 02] Concentration (chlorid e equivalent

s ppmvd ) <9.8 0 ppmv d (21%-7% ) (21% - Meas . 02 ) (21-7 ) = <1 3 (21 -10.38 )



### 4-2 4
VES01775 3

### Tabl e 4-18. Uni t 3 - Result

s o f HC1/CI

2 

### i n Stac k

Gas
Date Tim e Ru n 2

10-16-1 3 14:00-15:0

0 Ru n 3

10-17-1 3 12:30-13:3

3 Ru n 4

10-18-1 3 09:35-10:3 5 Volum e Collecte d (dscf ) 36.088 34.59 7 35.24 1 Oxyge n Concentratio n (% ) 11.1 9 10.7 2 10.8

7 Mas s Foun d (ug) Hydrogen Chlorid e 4,74 0 4,72

0 1,810 Chlorin e <13 0 <12

0 <14

0 Concentratio n (mg/dscf ) Hydrogen Chlorid e 0.13 1 0.13 6 0.051 4 Chlorin e <O.O03 6 <0.003

5 <0.004

0 Concentratio n (chlorid e equivalents ppmvd ) Hydrogen Chlorid e 3.0 6 3.1 8 1.2 0 Chlorin e <0.08 6 <0.08

3 <0.09

5 Tota l <3. 1 <3. 3 <1.

3 Concentratio n (Chlorid e equivalents , ppmvd , correcte d t o 7 % 0 2 ) Total <4. 5 <4.

4 <1.

8 Average <3.6



### Tabl e 4-19 . Uni

t 4 - Result

s o f HCI/CI 2 

### i n Stac k

Gas Dat e Tim e Run l

10/23/201 3 12:36-13:36 Ru n 3

10/24/201 3 12:35-13:3

5 Ru n 4

10/25/201 3 13:35-14:35 Volum e Collecte d (dscf ) 39.935 39.26 4 37.03

4 Oxyge n Concentratio n (% ) 12.2

7 12.3

7 12.0

0 Mas s Foun d (ug

) Hydrogen Chlorid e 11,10 0 8,15

0 23,60

0 Chlorin e <13 0 <12

0 <14

0 Concentratio n (mg/dscf ) Hydrogen Chlorid e 0.27 8 0.20

8 0.63

7 Chlorin e <0.003 3 <0.003 1 <0.003 8 Concentratio n (chlorid e equivalent s ppmvd ) Hydrogen Chlorid e 6.4 7 4.84 14. 8 Chlorin e <0.07 8 <0.07

3 <0.09 1 Total <6. 6 <4.

9 <1

5 Concentratio n (Chlorid e equivalents , ppmvd , correcte d t o 7% 0 2 ) Total <1 1 <8. 0 <2

3 Averag e <14


### 4-25
VES01775 4

### 4.2. 3 Metal s i n Stac k Ga s Metal s wer

e sampledi n th

e stac k ga s usin g EP A Metho d29 . Th e sample s wer

e analyze d fo r th e si x (6) metal s regulate

db y th e HW C MACT . Fiv e metals , arsenic , beryllium , cadmium , chromium , an

dlead ) wer e analyzedusing ICPE S accordin g t o Metho d60 1 O

B o f SW-846 . Mercur y analysi s was performedb y col dvapor atomic absorption spectroscop y accordin g t

o Metho d7470 A o f

SW-846 . The Metho d29 sampling train s wer e recovere dt o provide th

e followin g fractions :

• Prob e an

dnozzl e rins e wit

h 0. 1 N nitri c aci d(PNR) ;
• Filte r (FILT) ;
• Conten

t an drins e o f th e acidifie dperoxid

e impingers wit

h 0. 1 N nitri c aci d(NPI) ;
• Contents an

drins e o f th e empt y impinge r wit h 0. 1 N nitri c aci d(EIR) ;
• Content

s an drins e o f th e acidifie dpermanganat

e impinger s wit

h deionize dwater

, 0. 1 N nitri c acid , an

dpermanganat

e solution (Perm) ; and ;
• Rins e o f

th e permanganat

e impinger s wit

h hydrochlori c aci d(HClRns)
. Th e analytica

l results fo r

metal s i n th

e individual sampl

e fraction s ar

e presente d i n Tabl e 4-20 fo r Uni t 2 , Tabl e 4-2 2 fo r

Uni t 3 , an dTabl e 4-2

4 fo r Uni t 4 . The concentration s o f

th e metal s i n th

e stac k ga s ar e presente d i n Tabl e 4-2 1 fo r

Uni t 2 , Tabl e 4-2 3 fo r

Uni t 3 , an dTabl e 4-25 fo r Uni t 4 . Th e concentration o f

oxygen measure

d using CEM S an

dEP A Metho d3 A durin g th e secon dhal f o f th e tes t ar e shown i n Table s 4-21,4-23 , an d4-25 , an dth e concentratio n of metal s i n th

e stac k ga s correctedt

o 7 % O 2 i s shown
. Th

e concentration s o f

cadmiuman

dlea d ar e show n summe da s SVM , an

dth e concentration s o f

arsenic , beryllium , an

dchromiumar

e show n summe da s LVM . Th e analytica

l results fo r

th e determination o f

metal s i n th

e stac k ga s ar e include di n Appendi x G3 .

4-2 6
VES01775 5

### Tabl e 4-20 . Uni t 2 - Analytica l Result

s o f Metal s i n Stac k

Gas

Ru n Analyt e Nitri c Aci d PN R & Filte r Nitri c Aci d &

Hydroge n Peroxid e Impingers Empt y

Impinge r Rins e Potassiu m

Permanganate Impinge r HC I

Rins e Tota l

1 Arseni c <0.3 7 <0.2

5 <0.2

5 <0.87
1 Berylliu m <0.01 5 <0.01 5 <0.01 5 <0.045 1 Cadmiu

m <0.02 1 <0.02 1 <0.02 1 <0.O6 3 1 Chromiu

m 3.

3 0.7

8 0.3

3
- 4.4 1 1 Lead 1. 3 0.3

5 <0.2

7 <1. 9 1
Mercur

y <0.0

8 84.

2 51. 6 <31.13 6 1.

1 <17 0

3 Arseni c <0.7 4 <0.2

5 <0.9 9
3 Berylliu m <0.015 <0.01 5 <0.0 3 3 Cadmiu

m <0.02 1 <0.021 <0.04 2 3 Chromiu

m 2. 5 0.5 5 3.0 5 3 Lead < 1 0.2

7 <1. 3 3
Mercur

y <0.0

8 18

2 0.5

7 0.

5 17.

2 <200

5 Arseni c 0.7 7 <0.2

5 < 1
5 Berylliu m 0.01 6 <0.015 <0.03 1 5 Cadmiu

m <0.02 1 <0.02 1 <0.04 2 5 Chromiu

m 2.3 0.8 1 3.1 1 5 Lea

d <

1 0.6

6 <1.7 5
Mercur

y <0.0

8 14

2 <0.1 5 3.4 14. 3 <160

1 Th e empt

y impinger wa

s analyze

d fo r As , Be , Cd , Cr , an d P b du e t o carry-over fro m th

e secon d nitric aci d an

d hydroge n peroxide impinger.



### 4-2 7
VES01775 6

### Tabl e 4-21 . Uni t 2 - Result

s o f Metal s i n Stac k

Gas Run l Ru n 3 Ru n 5 Date 10-8-1 3 10-10-1 3 10-30-1 3 Tim e 15:40-18:4

3 12:30-15:1 0 12:45-15:3 2 Averag e Volum e CoUecte d (dscf ) 84.95

2 78.95 1 79.60 7 Averag e Oxyge n Concentratio n (% ) 10.0

8 10.38 10.50 Averag e
Mas s Foun d (ng

) Arseni c <0.8 7 <0.9

9 <1.

0 Berylliu m <0.04 5 <0.03

0 <0.03 1 Cadmiu m <0.06 3 <0.04

2 <0.04

2 Chromiu m 4.4 1 3.0 5 3.1 1 Lead <1. 9 <1.

3 <1.

7 Mercur y <17 0 <20

0 <16

0 Stac k Ga s Concentratio n (ug/dscf ) Arseni c <0.01 0 <0.013 <0.013 <0.012 Berylliu m <0.0005 3 <0.0003

8 <0.0003

9 <0.0004

3 Cadmiu m <0.0007 4 <0.0005

3 <0.0005

3 <0.0006

0 Chromiu m 0.051 9 0.038 6 0.039 1 0.043 2 Lea d <0.02 3 <0.01 6 <0.02 1 <0.02 0 Mercur y <2. 0 <2.

5 <2.

0 <2.

2 Stac k Ga s Concentratio n (ng/dscm ) Arseni c <0.3 6 <0.4

4 <0.4

5 <0.4

2 Berylliu m <0.01 9 <0.013 <0.01 4 <0.01 5 Cadmiu m <0.02 6 <0.01 9 <0.01 9 <0.02 1 Chromiu m 1.8 3 1.3

6 1.3

8 1.5

3 Lea d <0.8 0 <0.5

7 <0.7

4 <0.7

0 Mercur y <7 0 <9

0 <7

1 <7

7 Stac k Ga s Concentratio n (ug/dscm , 7 % 0 2 ) Arseni c <0.4 6 <0.5

9 <0.6

0 <0.5

5 Berylliu m <0.02 4 <0.01 8 <0.01 8 <0.02 0 Cadmiu m <0.03 4 <0.02

5 <0.02

5 <0.02

8 Chromiu m 2.3 5 1.8

0 1.8

4 2.0

0 Lea d <1. 0 <0.7

5 <0.9

8 <0.9

2 Mercur y <9 0 <12

0 <9

5 <10

0 SV M (Cd , Pb ) <1. 1 <0.7 8 <1.

0 <0.9

5 L V M (As , Be , Cr ) <2. 8 <2.4 <2. 5 <2.

6 Mercur y <9 0 <12

0 <9

5 <10

0



### 4-2 8
VES01775 7

### Tabl e 4-22 . Uni t 3 - Analytica l Result

s o f Metal s i n Stac k

Ga s

Ru n Analyt e Nitri c Aci d PN R & Filte r Nitri c Aci d

& Hydroge n Peroxid e Impingers Empt y

Impinge r Rins e Potassiu m

Permanganat e Impinge r HC I

Rins e Tota l

2 Arseni c <0.7 4 <0.2

5 <0.9 9
2 Berylliu m <0.01 5 <0.01 5 <0.O 3 2 Cadmiu

m <0.02 1 <0.02 1 <0.04 2 2 Chromiu

m 10.6 0.56 11. 2 2 Lea

d 28. 6 <0.2 7 <29 2
Mercur

y <0.0

8 8 1 0.2 9 0.2 1 2. 5 <84

3 Arseni c <0.7 4 <0.2

5 <0.9 9
3 Berylliu m <0.015 <0.01 5 <0.O 3 3 Cadmiu

m <0.02 1 <0.02 1 <0.O4 2 3 Chromium 11 0.7 9 11. 8 3 Lead 19. 4 <0.2

7 <2 0 3
Mercur

y <0.0

8 52. 2 0.2 5 <0.04

8 2.

6 <5

5

4 Arsenic <0.3 7 0.8

3 <1. 2
4 Berylliu m <0.015 <0.01 5 <0.0 3 4 Cadmium 0.9 1 <0.02 1 <0.9 3 4 Chromiu

m 13.

7 0.7

2 14. 4 4 Lead 15. 7 0.

3 1 6 4
Mercur

y <0.0

8 5

4 0.1 8 0.1 6 12. 8 <6

7



### 4-29
VES01775 8

### Tabl e 4-23 . Uni t 3 - Result

s o f Metal s i n Stac k

Ga s Ru n 2 Ru n 3 Ru n 4 Dat e 10-16-1 3 10-17-1 3 10-18-1 3 Tim e 14:00-16:50 12:30-15:2 5 09:35-12:2

0 Averag e Volum e Collecte d (dscf ) 71.70 8 69.01 6 71.54 0 Averag e Oxyge n Concentratio n (% ) 11.1 9 10.7 2 10.8

7 Averag e
Mas s Foun d (ug

) Arseni c <0.9 9 <0.9

9 <1.

2 Berylliu m <0.030 <0.03 0 <0.03

0 Cadmium <0.04 2 <0.04

2 <0.9

3 Chromium 11. 2 11.8 14. 4 Lea d <2 9 <2

0 16.

0 Mercur y <8 4 <5

5 <6

7 Stac k Ga s Concentratio n (ug/dscf ) Arseni c <0.01 4 <0.01 4 <0.017 <0.01 5 Berylliu m <0.0004 2 <0.0004

3 <0.0004

2 <0.0004

2 Cadmium <0.0005 9 <0.0006 1 <0.013 <0.004 7 Chromium 0.15 6 0.17 1 0.20 2 0.17

6 Lea d <0.4 0 <0.2

9 0.22

4 <0.3

0 Mercur y <1. 2 <0.8

0 <0.9

4 <0.9

7 Stac k Ga s Concentratio n (ug/dscm) Arseni c <0.4 9 <0.5 1 <0.5 9 <0.5

3 Berylliu m <0.01 5 <0.01 5 <0.01 5 <0.01 5 Cadmium <0.02 1 <0.02 1 <0.4 6 <0.1 7 Chromium 5.5 0 6.0 3 7.1 2 6.2 2 Lea d <14 <10 7.9 0 <1 1 Mercur y <4 1 <2

8 <3

3 <3

4 Stac k Ga s Concentratio n (ug/dscm , 7 % 0 2 ) Arseni c <0.7 0 <0.6

9 <0.8

2 <0.7

4 Berylliu m <0.02 1 <0.02 1 <0.021 <0.02 1 Cadmium <0.030 <0.02 9 <0.6

4 <0.2

3 Chromiu m 7.8 7 8.2

3 9.8

7 8.6

6 Lea d <2 0 <14 10. 9 <15 Mercury <5 9 <3

9 <4

6 <4

8 SV M (Cd , Pb) <2 0 <14 <1 2 <1

5 L V M (As , Be , Cr

) <8. 6 <8.9 <1 1 <9. 4 Mercur y <5 9 <3

9 <4

6 <4

8



### 4-3 0
VES01775 9

### Metal s HWC MAC T Sampl e Calculation , ug/dsc m @ 7 % 0 2 

### Tota l Mas

s (pg ) = Su m o

f Masse s i n Individua l Sampl e Fraction s (Se e Tabl e 4-20

) Uni t 2 - Ru n 1 , Arseni c

Arseni c Mas s (u.g

) Metal s Stac

k Concentratio n (ug/dscf ) =
Metal s Stac

k Concentratio n (ug/dscf ) = Sampl

e Volume (dscf

) <0.8 7 u g <0.01 0 84.95 2 dsc f

Metal s Stac

k Concentratio n (ug/dscm) Arseni c Stac k Concentration (ug/dscf )
Metal s Stac

k Concentratio n (ug/dscm) = <0.010 ug/dsc f 35.31 5 dsc f 1 dsc m 35.31 5 dsc

f ldsc m = <0.3 6

Metal s Stac

k Concentratio n (ug/dsc m _Arseni c Stac k (21 % - 7% ) @ 7 % 0 2 ) Concentration (ug/dscm) (21%. Meas . 0 2 ) Metal s Stac

k Concentratio n (ug/dsc m _<Q3 g x

### Qkzll
_ <Q 4 g @7%0 2 ) ~ * (21-10.08 )



### 4-3 1
VES01776 0

### Tabl e 4-24. Uni t 4 - Analytica l Result

s o f Metal s i n Stac k

Gas

Ru n Analyt e Nitri c Aci d PN R & Filte r Nitri c Aci d

& Hydroge n Peroxid e Impingers Empt y

Impinge r Rins e Potassiu m

Permanganate Impinge r HC I

Rins e Tota l

1 Arseni c 9. 1 <0.2 5 <9. 4
1 Berylliu m <0.01 5 <0.01 5 <0.0 3 1 Cadmium 0.3 3 <0.02 1 <0.35 1 Chromium 5. 5 0.8

2 6.3 2 1 Lea d 10. 4 0.7 1 11. 1 1
Mercur

y <0.0

8 9 <0.12 <0.04 8 0.2

2 <9. 5

2 Arseni c 7. 9 <0.2 5 <8. 2
2 Berylliu m <0.01 5 <0.01 5 <0.0 3 2 Cadmiu

m 0.1 5 <0.02 1 <0.1 7 2 Chromium 4. 2 0.6

6 4.8 6 2 Lea d 5.4 0.4 2 5.8 2 2
Mercur

y <0.0

8 10.

4 <0.1 2 <0.04 7 <0.08

2 <1 1

3 Arseni c 2. 7 <0.2

5 < 3
3 Berylliu m <0.01 5 <0.01 5 <0.O 3 3 Cadmium 0.06 9 <0.02 1 <0.0 9 3 Chromium 6. 9 0.6

2 7.5 2 3 Lea d 1 4 0.4

4 14. 4 3
Mercur

y <0.0

8 19.

5 <0.12 <0.04 7 0.7

5 <2 0



### 4-3 2
VES01776 1Tabl e 4-25 . Uni t 4 - Result

s o f Metal s i n Stac k

Gas Run l Ru n 2 Ru n 3 Date 10-23-1

3 10-24-1

3 10-25-1

3 Tim e 12:36-15:2

0 12:35-15:1

5 13:35-16:1

1 Averag e Volum e Collecte d (dscf ) 76.06

8 76.49

8 76.84

6 Averag e Oxyge n Concentratio n (% ) 12.2

7 12.3

7 12.0

0 Averag e
Mas s Foun d (ug

) Arseni c <9. 4 <8.

2 <3.

0 Berylliu m <0.03 0 <0.03

0 <0.03

0 Cadmiu m <0.3 5 <0.1 7 <0.09 0 Chromiu m 6.3 2 4.8 6 7.5 2 Lea d 11. 1 5.8 2 14.

4 Mercur y <9. 5 <1 1 <2 0 Stac k Ga s Concentratio n (ug/dscf ) Arseni c <0.12 <0.1 1 <0.03 8 <0.08

9 Berylliu m <0.0003 9 <0.00039 <0.0003 9 <0.0003

9 Cadmiu m <0.004 6 <0.002

2 <0.0012 <0.002 7 Chromiu m 0.083 1 0.0635 0.097 9 0.081 5 Lea d 0.14 6 0.076 1 0.18 8 0.13

7 Mercury <0.12 <0.1 4 <0.2 7 <0.1 8 Stack Ga s Concentratio n (ng/dscm ) Arseni c <4. 3 <3.

8 <1.

4 <3.

2 Berylliu m <0.014 <0.01 4 <0.01 4 <0.014 Cadmiu m <0.1 6 <0.07 9 <0.04 1 <0.09 4 Chromiu m 2.9 3 2.2

4 3.46 2.8 8 Lea d 5.1 6 2.6 9 6.6

4 4.8

3 Mercury <4. 4 <5.0 <9. 4 <6.

3 Stack Ga s Concentratio n (ug/dscm , 7 % 0 2 ) Arseni c <7. 0 <6. 1 <2. 1 <5. 1 Berylliu m <0.02 2 <0.02

3 <0.02

2 <0.02

2 Cadmium <0.2 6 <0.1 3 <0.06 5 <0.15 Chromiu m 4.7 3 3.66 5.4 0 4.5

9 Lea d 8.3 1 4.3 8 10.

4 7.6

8 Mercury <7. 1 <8. 1 <1 5 <10.

0 SV M (Cd , Pb ) <8. 6 <4.

5 <1 0 <7. 8 L V M (As , Be , Cr ) <1 2 <9.

8 <7.

5 <9.

7 Mercury <7. 1 <8. 1 <1 5 <10.

0

4-3 3
VES01776 2

### 4.2. 4 Dioxins/Furan s i n Stac k Ga s Stac k ga s sample s fo r

deterrninatio

n o f dioxins/furan s wer

e collecte dusin g SW-84 6 Metho d0023 A an

dwer e analyzedusing SW-84 6 Metho d8290 , ahig h resolutio n ga s chromatograph

y (HRGC ) wit

h high resolutio n mas s spectroscop y (HRMS ) analytica

l technique
. The sampling trai n wa

s recovere dto provid e th

e followin g fractions :

• Combine dprob e an

dnozzl e rins e wit

h acetone , methylen

e chlorid e an

dtoluen e (PNR) ;
• Filte r (FILT) ;
• Condense

r rins e wit h acetone , methylen

e chloride , an

dtoluen e (CR) ; an d

• XA D sorben

t (XAD) . Component

s recoveredfro mth

e train wer

e combine da

s follows :

• Combinatio n o f

th e filte r an dal l th e rinse s betwee

n th e nozzl e an

dfilter ; an

d
• Combinatio n o f

th e sorben t andal l th e rinse s betwee

n th e filte r an dsorbent
. Afte r sampl e cleanu p an dconcentration procedure s a t th e analytical laboratory , a

n aliquo t ofth e front-hal f

extract s (i.e. , PN Ran

dfilter ) i s combinedan

danalyze dusin g SW-84 6 Metho d 8290 fo r dioxins/furan s separat

e fro mth e back-hal f

component

s (i.e. , condense

r rinses , XA D sorbent)
. Dioxins/furan s results ar e presente d i n Tabl e 4-2 6 fo r

Uni t 2 , Tabl e 4-2

7 fo r Uni t 3 , and Tabl e 4-2 8 fo r

Uni t 4 . The concentration o f

oxygen measure

d usin g CEM S an

dEP A Metho d3 A durin g th e secon dhalf o f th e run ar e show n i n th e tables , an

dth e concentration o f

dioxins/furan s correctedt

o 7 % 0 2

### i s shown
. Th e analytica

l result s fo r

th e dioxins/furan s analyse s ar e include di n Appendi x G2 . Result s fo r

dioxins/furan s ar

e converte dt o 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-dioxin toxicit y equivalent s (TEQ) . Not

e tha t Sectio n §1208(b)(l)(iii ) o f th e HW C MAC T states tha t non-detect

s (al l result s precede d b y a"<" ) o f

dioxins/furan s ca

n be assume

d t o b e a t zer o concentrations
. Additionally , results followe dby a

n "* " ar e denote d a s Estimate dPossibl e Maximu mConcentrations , an dar e likewis e no

t include di n th

e calculatio n o f

tota l mass .

4-3 4
VES01776 3Tabl e 4-26 . Uni t 2 - Result s o f Dioxins/Furan s i n Stac k Ga s
Dat e Tim e Run l

10-8-1 3 15:40-18:5

5 Ru n 3 10-10-1 3 12:30-15:4

0 Ru n 5 10-30-1 3 12:45-16:0

2 Volum e Collecte

d (dscf ) 121.16 4 119.56 8 124.92 1 Oxyge n Concentratio

n (% ) 10.0 8 10.3 8 10.5 0 Analyt e Toxicit

y Equivalen

tFactor 1 Mas s Foun d (pg) 2 Analyt e Toxicit

y Equivalen

tFactor 1 PNR/Filte r XAD/Con d Su m __ , PNR/Filte r XAD /Con d Su m PNR/Filte r XAD/Con d Su m 2,3,7,8-TCD D 1 <2.9 J <3. 6 <6. 5 <2. 8 < 3 <5. 8 <4. 6 <4. 7 <9. 3 1,2,3,7,8-PeCD D 0. 5 <1. 4 7.2 * <8. 6 <1. 6 6.9 * <8. 5 <2. 1 2 3 * <25. 1 1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCD D 0. 1 <1. 2 7. 3 <8. 5 <1. 2 5 <6. 2 <1. 7 2 0 <21. 7 1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCD D 0. 1 <1. 2 1 4 <15. 2 <1. 2 1 5 <16. 2 <1. 6 3 9 <40. 6 1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCD D 0. 1 <1. 2 1 2 <13. 2 <1. 2 1 7 <18. 2 <1. 7 4 8 <49. 7 1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCD D 0.0 1 3. 3 * " 8 2 85.3 * 2. 9 9 4 96. 9 < 2 25 0 <25 2 OCD D 0.00 1 9. 1 11 0 119. 1 8. 1 * 12 0 128. 1 * 7. 7 35 0 357. 7 2,3,7,8-TCD F 0. 1 <1, 7 9. 5 <11. 2 < 2 9. 3 <U. 3 < 3 4 9 <5 2 1,2,3,7,8-PeCD F 0.0 5 <1. 1 1 1 * <12. 1 <1. 1 12 * <13. 1 <2. 1 7 2 * <74. 1 2,3,4,7,8-PeCD F 0. 5 <1. 2 1 6 <17. 2 <1. 1 1 8 <19. 1 <2. 1 110 * <U2. 1 1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCD F 0. 1 <0.6 9 4 1 * <41.6 9 <0.8 2 4 6 * <46.8 2 <1. 1 190 * <191. 1 1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCD F 0. 1 <0.6 1 17 * <17.6 1 <0.7 3 17 * <17.7 3 < 1 130 * <13 1 1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCD F 0. 1 <0.7 5 2. 9 <3.6 5 <0.8 9 2. 1 <2.9 9 <1. 2 1 2 <13. 2 2,3,4,6,7,8-HxCD F 0. 1 <0.6 5 1 3 * <13.6 5 <0.7 7 16 * < 16.7 7 <1. 1 13 0 <131. 1 1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCD F 0.0 1 5 * 7 9 84 * 4 8 9 9 3 2.4 * 78 0 782. 4 * 1,2,3,4,7,8,9-HpCD F 0.0 1 <1. 7 1 0 <11. 7 <1. 8 1 2 <13. 8 <1. 7 11 0 <111. 7 OCD F 0.00 1 1 1 * 11 0 12 1 * 1 1 9 8 * 109 * 9. 7 630 * 639. 7 *

Tota l Toxicit y Equivalent

s 0.0091 0 14. 5 14. 5 0.080 0 15. 9 16. 0 0.017 4 41. 6 41. 6 Concentratio

n (n g TEQ /dscf ) 0.00012 0 0.00013 4 0.00033 3 Concentratio

n (n g TEQ/dscm

) 0.0042 3 0.0047 2 0.011 8 Concentratio

n (n g TEQ/dscm @ 7 % 0 2 ) 0.0054 3 0.0062 4 0.015 7 Averag e Concentratio

n (n g TEQ/dscm @ 7 % Oi ) 0.0091 2

1 Toxi c Equivalenc y Facto r (TEF ) a s develope din : "Interi mProcedur e fo r Estimatin g Risk s Associate dWit h Exposure s to Mixture s o f Chlorinate dDibenzo-p-Dioxi n an d-Dibenzofuran s (CDD s an d CDFs ) an d198 9 Update" , Marc h 1989 ; Va n den Berg , M „ e t a] . "Toxi c Equivalenc y Factor s (TEFs ) fo r PCBs , PCDDs , PCDF s fo r Human s andWildlife " Environmental Healt h Perspectives , Volum e 106 , Numbe

r 12 . Decembe

r 1998. , a s directe dby the Preambl e to th e HW C MACT . 2Result s followe db y a

n "* " ar e Estimate dMaximu mPossibl e Concentration s (EMPCs) . 3 I n accordanc e wit

h Sectio n §1208(b)(l)(iii ) o f th e HW C MACT , non-detects o f dioxins/furan s ar

e assume d t o b e a t zero concentrations
. I n accordanc e with th

e USEP A Analytica l Service s Branc h documen t National Functional

Guidelines/or

Chlorinated

Dibenzo-p-Dioxins and

Chlorinated

Dibenzofurans Data Review, EMPC s ar e not include di n th

e calculatio n o f

TEFs .

4-3 5
VES01776 4

### Dioxins/Furan s HW C MAC T Sampl e Calculatio n n g TEQ/dsc m @ 7

% O 2 (continued ) Uni t 2 - Ru n 1

Stac k Concentratio n (ng TEQ/dscf )

Stac k Concentratio n (n g TEQ/dscf ) Su m of al l TE Q

Value s (pg ) Sampl e Volum e (dscf ) 14. 5 p g TE Q 121.16 4 dsc f 1 n g
10 3 p g 1 n g 10 3 p g = 0.0O012 0

Stac k Concentratio n (ng TEQ/dscm ) =

Stac k Concentratio n (n g TEQ/dscm ) Concentratio n (n g TEQ/dscf )
0.00012 0 35.31 5 dsc f

1 dsc m 35.31 5 dsc f 1 dsc m 0.0042 3

Stack Concentratio n (ng TEQ/dsc m @ 7 % 0 2 )

Stac k Concentratio n (n g TEQ/dsc m @ 7 % 0 2 ) Concentratio n

(n g TEQ/dscm ) 0.0042 3 (21 % -7%)

(21%-Meas.Oz ) (2 1 - 7 ) = 0.00543 (21-10.08 )



### 4-3 6
VES01776 5Tabl e 4-27 . Uni t 3 - Result s o f Dioxins/Furan s i n Stac k Ga s
Dat e Tim e Run 2

10-16-1 3 14:00-17:2

0 Run 3 10-17-1 3 12:30-15:5

5 Run 4 10-18-1 3 09:35-12:5

0 Volum e Collecte

d (dscf ) 106.30 3 102.72 4 102.62 4 Oxyge n Concentratio

n (% ) 11.1 9 10.7 2 10.8 7 Analyt e Toxicit

y Equivalen

tFactor 1 Mas s Foun d (pg) 2 Analyt e Toxicit

y Equivalen

tFactor 1 PNR/Filte r XAD/Con d Su m PNR/Filte r XAD/Con d Su m PNR/Filte r XAD/Con d Su m 2,3,7,8-TCD D 1 <0.14 J 1. 1 * <1.2 4 <0. 7 3.8 * <4. 5 <0.2 9 1.9 * <2.1 9 1,2,3,7,8-PeCD D 0.5 0.2 3 4.8 * 5.0 3 * 1.4 * 12 * 13.4 * <0.1 5 5 * <5.1 5 1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCD D 0. 1 <0.1 5 2. 6 <2.7 5 <0. 7 4. 1 * <4. 8 <0.4 2 3 <3.4 2 1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCD D 0. 1 0.2 2 ^ 5. 3 5.52 * <0.6 7 1 1 * <11.6 7 <0. 4 5. 1 * <5. 5 1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCD D 0. 1 0.4 1 * 5. 6 6.0 1 * 1.5 * 12 * 13.5 * 1.4 * 8. 1 9. 5 * 1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCD D 0.0 1 1.5 * 2 9 30. 5 * 1.6 * 5 7 58.6 * 1. 9 2 9 30. 9 OCD D 0.00 1 7.7 * 3 7 44.7 * 1 2 4 0 5 2 5.6 * 2 8 33. 6 * 2,3,7,8-TCD F 0. 1 0.2 9 6.8 * 7.09 * <0.4 7 1 4 <14.4 7 <0.2 9 1 1 <11.2 9 1,2,3,7,8-PeCD F 0.0 5 <0.1 1 9. 1 * <9.21 ^ <0.7 8 2 0 * <20.7 8 <0.3 1 12 * <12.3 1 2,3,4,7,8-PeCD F 0.5 <0.1 1 19 * <19.1 1 <0.7 8 36 * <36.7 8 <0.3 1 2 7 * <27.3 1 1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCD F 0. 1 0.48 * 2 5 * 25.4 8 * 2.5 * 6 1 * 63.5 * 0.62 * 2 6 * 26.6 2 * 1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCD F 0. 1 0.2 2 * 1 1 * 11.22 * <0.5 7 2 3 * <23.5 7 0.29 * 12 * 12.2 9 * 1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCD F 0. 1 0. 7 0. 9 * 1.6 * 1.4 * 2.4 * 3.8 * 0.56 * 1.2 * 1.7 6 * 2,3,4,6,7,8-HxCD F 0. 1 0.42 * 1 1 * 11.42 * 1.3 * 2 1 * 22. 3 * 0.55 * 12 * 12.5 5 * 1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCD F 0.0 1 1 . 1 * 2 8 29. 1 * <0.6 3 4 3 <43.6 3 0.78 * 2 2 22.7 8 * 1 ,2,3,4,7,8,9-HpCD F 0.0 1 0.4 8 * 3.8 * 4.28 * 1.9 * 5 * 6.9 * 0.66 * 4. 4 5.0 6 * OCD F 0.00 1 3. 8 8.5 * 12.3 * 5. 8 9. 7 * 15.5 * 4. 7 5.7 * 10. 4 *

Tota l Toxicit

y Equivalent

s 0.21 8 1.9 6 2.1 7 0.017 8 2.4 4 2.4 6 0.023 7 2.7 9 2.8 2 Concentratio

n (n g TEQ/dscf

) 0.000020 5 0.000023 9 0.000027 4 Concentratio

n (n g TEQ/dscm

) 0.00072 2 0.00084 5 0.00096 9 Concentratio

n (n g TEQ/dsc m @ 7

% O2 ) 0.0010 3 0.0011 5 0.0013 4 Averag e Concentratio

n (n g TEQ/dscm @ 7

% O2 ) 0.0011 8

1 Toxi c Equivalenc y Facto r (TEF ) a s develope d in : "Interi mProcedur e fo r Estimatin g Risk s Associate dWit h Exposure s t o Mixture s o f

Chlorinate dDibenzo-p-Dioxi n an d -Dibenzofuran s (CDD s an d CDFs ) an d 1989 Update" , Marc h 1989 ; Va n de n Berg , M „ e

t al
. "Toxi c Equivalenc y Factor s (TEFs ) fo r PCBs , PCDDs , PCDF s fo r Human s an d Wildlife " Environmental Healt h Perspectives , Volum e 106 , Numbe

r 12 , Decembe

r 1998. , a s directe d by th e Preambl e to th e HW C MACT . 2Result s followe db y a n "* " ar e Estimate d Maximu mPossibl e Concentration s (EMPCs) . 3 I n accordanc e wit

h Sectio n § 1208(b) ( 1 )(iii ) o f th e HW C MACT , non-detects o f dioxins/furan s ar

e assumed t

o be a t zer o concentrations
. 4 I n accordanc e wit

h the USEP A Analytica l Service s Branc h documen t National Functional

Guidelines

for Chlorinated

Dibenzo-p-Dioxins and Chlorinated

Dibenzofurans Data Review, EMPC s ar e no t include di n th

e calculatio n o f

TEFs .

4-3 7
VES01776 6Tabl e 4-28 . Uni t 4 - Result s o f Dioxins/Furan s i n Stac k Ga s
Dat e Tim e Run l

10-23-1 3 12:36-15:5

0 Run 2 10-24-1 3 12:35-15:4

5 Ru n 3 10-25-1 3 13:35-16:4

1 Volum e Collecte

d (dscf ) 110.79 1 112.80 3 115.28 4 Oxyge n Concentratio

n (% ) 12.2 7 12.3 7 12.0 0 Analyt e Toxicit

y Equivalen

tFactor1 Mas s Foun d (pg) , Analyt e Toxicit

y Equivalen

tFactor1 PNR/Filte r XAD/Con d Su m PNR/Filte r XAD/Con d Su m PNR/Filte r XAD/Con d Su m 2,3,7,8-TCD D 1 <4.9 3 7 * <11. 9 <4. 3 9. 5 * <13. 8 <2. 5 8.2 * <10. 7 1,2,3,7,8-PeCD D 0. 5 <1. 9 120 * <121. 9 <2. 2 120 * <122. 2 2 120 * 12 2 * 1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCD D 0. 1 < 2 23 0 <23 2 4. 3 23 0 234. 3 3.9 * 23 0 233. 9 * 1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCD D 0. 1 1 3 * * 99 0 1003 * 9.4 * 93 0 939. 4 * 1 6 94 0 95 6 1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCD D 0. 1 1 0 * 64 0 650 * 12 * 65 0 662 * 1 2 63 0 64 2 1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCD D 0.0 1 16 0 610 0 626 0 13 0 550 0 563 0 16 0 590 0 606 0 OCD D 0.00 1 17 0 360 0 377 0 15 0 350 0 365 0 19 0 410 0 429 0 2,3,7,8-TCD F 0. 1 3.8 * 7 8 81.8 * <2. 9 7 0 <72. 9 3.6 * 7 0 73. 6 * 1,2,3,7,8-PeCD F 0.0 5 < 2 130 * <13 2 <2. 1 120 * <122. 1 <1. 2 110 * <111. 2 2,3,4,7,8-PeCD F 0.5 4.5 * 550 * 554. 5 * <2. 2 510 * <512. 2 4.7 * 430 * 434. 7 * 1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCD F 0. 1 4. 7 * 570 * 574. 7 * 5 510 * 515 * 3.6 * 26 0 263. 6 * 1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCD F 0. 1 2. 3 * 310 * 312. 3 * 2.7 * 290 * 292. 7 * 2.6 * 300 * J 302. 6 * 1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCD F 0. 1 <1. 3 3 9 * <40. 3 <1. 4 3 8 * <39. 4 <0.8 2 4 3 * <43.8 2 2,3,4,6,7,8-HxCD F 0. 1 7.9 * 600 * 607. 9 * 6. 9 510 * 516.9 * 8.4 * 560 * 568. 4 * 1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCD F 0.0 1 1 5 76 0 77 5 10 * 71 0 720 * 1 7 72 0 73 7 1,2,3,4,7,8,9-HpCD F 0.0 1 4. 1 * 18 0 184. 1 * 3.5 * 16 0 163. 5 * 5.9 * 20 0 205. 9 * OCD F 0.00 1 1 2 * 140 * 152 * 10 * 14 0 150 * J 1 1 * 160 * 17 1 *

Tota l Toxicit

y Equivalent

s 1.9 2 26 8 27 0 3.0 7 25 5 25 8 5.7 6 28 5 29 1 Concentratio

n (n g TEQ/dscf

) 0.0024 3 0.0022 9 0.0025 2 Concentratio

n (n g TEQ/dscm

) 0.086 0 0.080 9 0.089 2 Concentratio

n (n g TEQ/dscm @ 7% 0> 2 ) 0.13 8 0.13 2 0.13 9 Averag e Concentratio

n (n g TEQ/dscm @ 7

% O2 ) 0.13 7 Toxi c Equivalenc y Factor (TEF ) a s develope din : "Interi mProcedur e fo r Estimatin g Risk s Associate dWit h Exposure s to Mixture s o f Chlorinate dDibenzo-p-Dioxi n an d-Dibenzofuran s (CDD s an d CDFs ) an d198 9 Update" , Marc h 1989 ; Va n den Berg , M. , e t al
. "Toxi c Equivalenc y Factor s (TEFs ) fo r PCBs , PCDDs , PCDF s fo r Human s an

dWildlife " Environmental Healt h Perspectives , Volum e 106 , Numbe

r 12 . Decembe

r 1998. , a s directe dby the Preambl e t o th e HW C MACT . 2Result s followe db y a n "* " ar e Estimate dMaximu mPossibl e Concentiation s (EMPCs) . 3 I n accordanc e with Sectio n §1208(b)(l)(iii ) o f th e HW C MACT , non-detects o f dioxins/furan s ar

e assumed to b e a

t zer o concentrations
. 4 I n accordanc e with th

e USEP A Analytica l Service s Branc h documen t National Functional

Guidelines

for Chlorinated

Dibenzo-p-Dioxins and Chlorinated

Dibenzofurans Data Review, EMPC s ar e no t include di n th

e calculatio n o f

TEFs .

4-3 8
VES01776 7

### 4.2. 5 TH C i n Stac k Ga s Tota l hydrocarbon s (THC ) wer e monitore d i n th

e stac k ga s usin g EP A Metho d25A . TH C was monitored throughou t th e secon d hal f o f eac h run . Stac

k ga s concentration s o f

TH C ar e presente d i n Table 4-2 9 fo r

Uni t 2 , Tabl e 4-3 0 fo r

Uni t 3 , an d Tabl e 4-3 1 fo r

Uni t 4 . The concentratio

n o f oxyge n measure

d usin g CEM S an

d EP A Metho d3 A durin g th e secon d hal f o f th e ru n ar e show n i n th e tables , an

d th e concentration o f

TH C correcte d t

o 1% O 2 i s shown
. Tabl e 4-29. Uni

t 2 - Result

s fo r TH C i n Stac k

Gas
Dat e Tim e Run l

10-8-1 3 15:4 0 -18:5 5 Ru n 3

10-10-1 3 12:30 -15:4 0 Ru n 5

10-30-1 3 12:4 5 -16:0 2 T H C (ppmv , wet, as propane ) 0.6 8 0.0

7 0.2 1 Moistur e (%

) 44. 7 45. 3 42. 9 TH C (ppmv , dry , as propane ) 1. 2 0.1 3 0.3 7 Oxyge n Concentratio n (% ) 10.0

8 10.3

8 10.50 T H C (ppmv , dry , a

s propane , correcte d t o 7 % 0 2 ) 1.

6 0.1 8 0.49 Averag e TH C (ppmv , dry , a s propane , correcte d t o 7 % 0 2 ) 0.7 5


### TH C HW C MAC T Sampl e Calculatio n ppmvd @ 7

% 0 2 

### (continued ) Uni t 2 - Ru n 5
THC Concentratio n 1 TH C Concentration (ppmvd) = X (PP m v ) (l-( % Moisture/100%) ) TH C Concentration (ppmvd ) = 0.2 1 ppmv (1-(42.9%/100%) ) = 0.3 7

TH C Concentratio n (21%-7%) TH C Concentration (ppmvd) = X (Ppmvd ) (21% - Meas . 0 2 )
TH C Concentration (ppmvd) = 0.3 7 (21-7 ) (21-10.50 ) 0.4 9



### 4-3 9
VES01776 8Tabl e 4-30 . Uni t 3 - Result s fo r TH C i n Stac k Ga s Ru n 2 Ru n 3 Ru n 4 Date 10-16-1 3 10-17-1 3 10-18-1 3 Tim e 14:0

0 -17:2 0 12:30 -15:5 5 09:35 -12:5 0 T H C (ppmv , wet

, as propane ) 0.1 8 0.1 1 0.2 3 Moistur e (%

) 42. 9 44. 4 43. 7 T H C (ppmv , dry , a

s propane ) 0.3 1 0.1 9 0.4 1 Oxyge n Concentratio n (% ) 11.1 9 10.7 2 10.8

7 TH C (ppmv , dry , a

s propane , correcte d t o 7 % 0 2 ) 0.4

4 0.2

6 0.5

7 Averag e TH C (ppmv , dry , a s propane , correcte d t o 7 % 0 2 ) 0.4 3

Tabl e 4-31 . Uni t 4 - Result s fo r TH C i n Stac k Ga s Run l Ru n 2 Ru n 3 Dat e 10-23-1 3 10-24-1 3 10-25-1 3 Tim e 12:36-15:5 0 12:3 5 -15:4 5 13:3

5 -16:4 1 T H C (ppmv , wet

, a s propane ) 0.1 9 0.2 3 0.3

3 Moistur e (%

) 39. 2 38.3 39.3 T H C (ppmv , dry , a

s propane ) 0.3

2 0.3

7 0.54 Oxyge n Concentratio n (% ) 12.2

7 12.3

7 12.0

0 T H C (ppmv , dry , a

s propane , correcte d t o 7 % 0 2 ) 0.5 1 0.6 0 0.8

5 Averag e TH C (ppmv , dry , a s propane , correcte d t o 7 % 0 2 ) 0.6 5

4-40
VES01776 9

### 4.3 Chlorine , Ash , an d Metal s Feedrate s Thi s section present

s calculate dvalue s usin g th e analytica

l results presente

d previously , wast e feedrates , an

dspikin g feedrates
. Feedrate s ar e calculatedfor :

• Tota l Chlorine/Chloride ;
• Ash ; an

d
• Metals
. I n those circumstance s wher e aconstituen

t i s no t detecte d i n awast

e fee d(i.e. , i s no

t analyze dabov e th e detection limit) , th

e concentration o f

tha t paramete r i s treate d a s zer o "0 " i n th e calculatio n o f

th e feedrat e o f tha t constituen

t tha t becomes a

n OP L fo r tha t parameter . 4.3. 1 Chlorin e Feedrat e Feedrat e o f tota l chlorin e an

dchloride (i.e. , chlorine ) i s a n OP L fo r

th e emissio n standard s fo r hydroge n chloride an

dchlorin e ga

s (HC1/C1 2



### ) an dfo r SV M an dLVM . Th

e feedrat e o f chlorine ha

s bee n determine

ddurin g bot

h th e HCI /CI2 an dmetal s (i.e. , SV M an

dLVM ) stack samplin g i n th e secon dpar t o f eac h run . Tabl e 4-3 2 present s th e chlorin e feedrate s calculated during bot h th e HCI /CI2 an dmetal s stac

k samplin g fo r

Uni t 2 . Chlorin e feedrate s fo r

Uni t 3 ar e presente d i n Table 4-33 , an

dchlorin e feedrate s fo r

Uni t 4 ar e presente d i n Tabl e 4-34 . Fo r th e calculatio n o f

th e chlorin e feedrate , th

e weigh t o f th e Containerize dSoli dWast e use dt o calculat e th e feedrate s o f

chlorin e wa

s reduce db y th e weigh t o f th e box , an dth e spikin g material s lea

dnitrate , hexachloroethane , andth e solutio n o f

mercuri c nitrat

e t o determin

e th e feedrat e o f Containerize dSoli dWast e tha t wa s analyzedfo r

chlorine
. 4.3.2 As h Feedrat

e Feedrat e o f as h i s a n OP L fo r th e emissio n standar

d fo r particulat e matter . Th e feedrat

e o f as h ha s bee n determine

ddurin g th

e particulat

e matte r stac k sampling i n th

e first par t o f eac h run . Table 4-3 5 present

s th e as h feedrat e calculate ddurin g stac

k sampling fo r

particulat e matte r fo r Uni t 2 . As h feedrate s fo r

Uni t 3 ar e presente

d i n Tabl e 4-36 , an

das h feedrate s fo r

Uni t 4 ar e presente d i n Tabl e 4-37 .

4-4 1
VES01777 0Tabl e 4-32 . Uni t 2 - Chlorin e Feedrat e HCl/C b Stac

k Samplin

g Metal s Stac k Samplin

g Run l Run 3 Ru n 5 Run l Ru n 3 Ru

n 5 10-8-1 3 10-10-1

3 10-30-1

3 10-8-1

3 10-10-1

3 10-30-1

3 15:4 0 -16:4 0 12:3

0 -13:3 0 12:4 5 -13:4 5 15:4

0 -18:4 3 12:3 0 -15:1 0 12:4

5 -15:3 2 Feedrat e (lbs/hr ) 1,422. 1 1,500. 9 1,451. 9 1,474. 6 1,513. 3 1,396. 5 Low-Bt u Liqui dWast e Chlorin e Concentratio n (mg/kg ) 34 0 40 4 34 0 34 7 36 4 35 7 Chlorin e Feedrat e (lb/hr ) 0.4 8 0.6 1 0.4 9 0.5 1 0.5 5 0.5 0 Feedrat e (lbs/hr ) 1,370. 8 1,098. 7 1,200. 0 1,289. 1 1,098. 9 1,164. 6 High-Bt u Liqui dWast e Chlorin e Concentratio n (mg/kg ) 6.96 0 3,26 0 3,50 0 7,14 0 3,21 0 3,58 0 Chlorin e Feedrat e (lb/hr ) 9.5 4 3.5 8 4.2 0 9.2 0 3.5 3 4.1 7 Feedrat e (lbs/hr ) 485. 9 398. 2 440. 8 432. 6 425. 4 445. 3 Specialt y Liqui dWast e Chlorin e Concentratio n (mg/kg ) 10 5 13 0 10 6 \ 159 12 4 92. 4 Chlorin e Feedrat e (lb/hr ) 0.0 5 0.0 5 0.0 5 0.0 7 0.0 5 0.0 4 Feedrat e (lbs/hr ) 540. 0 534. 3 535. 7 j 547. 0 536. 1 542. 4 Containerize dSoli dWaste 1 Chlorin e Concentratio n (mg/kg ) 18 4 34 5 34 6 16 7 49 9 39 6 Chlorin e Feedrat e (lb/hr ) 0.1 0 0.1 8 0.1 9 0.0 9 0.2 7 0.2 1 Chlorin e Spikin g Chlorin e Feedrat e (lb/hr ) 197. 9 203. 1 197. 9 | 199. 7 j 199. 2 200. 2 Tota l Chlorin

e Feedrat

e (lb/hr ) 208.

0 207.

5 202.

8 | 209.

6 203.

6 205. 1 Averag e Chlorin

e Feedrat

e (lb/hr ) 206. 1 | 206. 1

1 Th e weigh

t o f th e Containerize dSoli dWast e use d to calculate th

e feedrate s o f

chlorin e and metal s has bee n reduced b y th

e weigh t o f the box , and th

e spikin g material s lead nitrate , hexachloroethane , and th e solutio n o f

mercuri c nitrate
.

4-4 2
VES01777 1Tabl e 4-33 . Uni t 3 - Chlorin e Feedrat e HCI/CI 2 Stac k Samplin

g Metal s Stac k Samplin

g Ru n 2 Run 3 Ru n 4 Run 2 Ru n 3 Run 4 10-16-1 3 10-17-1

3 10-18-1

3 10-16-1

3 10-17-1

3 10-18-1

3 14:0 0 -15:0 0 12:3 0 -13:3 3 09:3 5 -10:3 5 14:00-16:5

0 12:3 0 -15:2 5 09:3

5 -12:2 0 Low-Bt u Liqui dWast e Feedrat e (lbs/hr ) 1,783. 5 1,563. 4 1,725. 3 1,787. 6 1,685. 3 1,707. 4 Low-Bt u Liqui dWast e Chlorin e Concentratio n (mg/kg ) 56 3 40 9 38 8 41 9 42 9 40 8 Chlorin e Feedrat e (lb/hr ) 1.0 0 0.6 4 0.6 7 0.7 5 0.7 2 0.7 0 High-Bt u Liqui dWast e Feedrat e (lbs/hr ) 977. 2 1,151. 9 1,163. 5 1,043. 9 1,166. 5 1,197. 7 High-Bt u Liqui dWast e Chlorin e Concentratio n (mg/kg ) 2,46 0 1,69 0 1,91 0 2,72 0 1,65 0 1,81 0 High-Bt Chlorin e Feedrat e (lb/hr ) 2.4 0 1.9 5 2.2 2 2.8 4 1.9 2 2.1 7 Specialt y Liqui dWast e Feedrat e (ibs/hr ) 177. 5 407. 7 248. 8 202. 9 350. 0 244. 8 Specialt y Liqui dWast e Chlorin e Concentratio n (mg/kg ) 1,48 0 10 1 11 3 69 6 12 5 12 7 Specialt Chlorin e Feedrat e (lb/hr ) 0.2 6 0.0 4 0.0 3 0.1 4 0.0 4 0.0 3 Containerize dSoli dWaste 1 Feedrat e (Ibs/hr ) 550. 6 539. 6 516. 5 541. 9 536. 5 523. 9 Containerize dSoli dWaste 1 Chlorin e Concentratio n (rag/kg ) 48 2 11 5 38 2 19 5 27 1 25 5 Containerize dSoli dWaste 1 Chlorin e Feedrat e (lb/hr ) 0.2 7 0.0 6 0.2 0 0.1 1 0.1 5 0.1 3 Chlorin e Spikin g Chlorin e Feedrat e (lb/hr ) 203. 1 203. 3 197. 9 200. 3 201. 7 200. 7 Tota l Chlorin

e Feedrat

e (lb/hr ) 207.

0 206.

0 201.

0 204.

2 204.

6 203.

7 Averag e Chlorin

e Feedrat

e (lb/hr ) 204. 7 204. 2

' Th e weight

o f th e Containerize dSoli dWast e use dt o calculate th

e feedrate s o f

chlorin e an

dmetal s has bee

n reduce dby th

e weigh t o f th e box , an dth

e spikin g material s leadnitrate , hexachloroethane , andth

e solutio n o f

mercuri c nitrate
.

4-4 3
VES01777 2Tabl e 4-34 . Uni t 4 - Chlorin e Feedrat e HC1/C1 , Stac

k Samplin

g Metal s Stac k Samplin

g Run l 10-23-1 3 12:3 6 -13:3 6 Ru

n 2 10-24-1 3 12:3 5 -13:3 5 Ru

n 3 10-25-1 3 13:3 5 -14:3 5 Run l 10-23-1 3 12:3 6 -15:2 0 Ru

n 2 10-24-1 3 12:3 5 -15:1 5 Run 3

10-25-1 3 13:3 5 -16:1 1 Low-Bt u Liqui dWast e t o Kil n Feedrat e (lbs/hr ) 1,943. 7 1,996. 5 1,999. 6 1,978. 5 1,986. 6 1,999. 0 Low-Bt u Liqui dWast e t o Kil n Chlorin e Concentratio n (mg/kg ) 41 6 46 7 48 6 41 3 39 3 53 2 Chlorin e Feedrat e (lb/hr ) 0.8 1 0.9 3 0.9 7 0.8 2 0.7 8 1.0 6 High-Bt u Liqui dWast e t o Kil n Feedrat e (lbs/hr ) 1,167. 0 1,205. 4 1,201. 0 1,189. 2 1,201. 2 1,201. 8 High-Bt u Liqui dWast e t o Kil n Chlorin e Concentratio n (mg/kg ) 1,45 0 1,39 0 1,36 0 1,49 0 1,36 0 1,35 0 High-Bt Chlorin e Feedrat e (Ib/hr ) 1.6 9 1.6 8 1.6 3 1.7 7 1.6 3 1.6 2 Liqui dWast e to SC C Feedrat e (lbs/hr ) 1165. 6 1203. 1 1196. 3 1186. 2 1201. 5 1196. 2 Liqui dWast e to SC C Chlorin e Concentratio n (mg/kg ) 1,23 0 1,26 0 1,28 0 1,25 0 2,50 0 1,25 0 Chlorin e Feedrat e (lb/hr ) 1.4 3 1.5 2 1.5 3 1.4 8 3.0 0 1.5 0 Containerize dSoli dWaste 1 Feedrat e (lbs/hr ) 515. 3 512. 3 498. 3 514. 2 505. 4 507. 6 Containerize dSoli dWaste 1 Chlorin e Concentratio n (mg/kg ) 19 2 20 5 20 7 19 0 20 1 18 0 Containerize dSoli dWaste 1 Chlorin e Feedrat e (lb/hr ) 0.1 0 0.1 1 0.1 0 0.1 0 0.1 0 0.0 9 Bul k Soli dWast e Feedrat e (lbs/hr ) 6,093. 0 5,448. 0 5,739. 0 5,251. 5 5,598. 4 5,345. 0 Bul k Soli dWast e Chlorin e Concentratio n (mg/kg ) 18 4 25 7 19 1 21 9 24 3 17 3 Chlorin e Feedrat e (Ib/hr ) 1.1 2 1.4 0 1.1 0 1.1 5 1.3 6 0.9 2 Chlorin e Spikin g Chlorin e Feedrat e (lb/hr ) 197. 9 197. 9 197. 9 200. 0 197. 2 200. 3 Tota l Chlorin

e Feedrat

e (lb/hr ) 203.

0 203.

5 203.

2 205.

3 204. 1 205. 5 Averag e Chlorin

e Feedrat

e (lb/hr ) 203. 2 205. 0 Th e weight

o f th e Containerize dSoli dWast e use d t o calculate th

e feedrate s o f

chlorin e and metal s has bee n reduce d b y th

e weigh t o f th e box , and th

e spikin g material s lead nitrate , hexachloroethane , and th e solutio n o f

mercuri c nitrat

e

4-4 4
VES01777 3

### Tabl e 4-35 . Uni t 2 - As h Feedrat

e Durin g th e EPA Metho d 5 Stac k

Samplin g fo r PM Run l 10-8-1 3 11:5 0 -13:0 0 Ru n 2

10-9-1 3 09:45 -10:5 3 Ru n 3

10-10-1 3 09:4 5 -10:5 3
Low-Btu Liqui d Wast

e Feedrat e (lbs /hr ) 1,277.

2 1,353.

3 1,288.

3 Low-Btu Liqui d Wast

e As h Concentratio n (mg/kg ) 3,14

0 2,96

0 3,250 Low-Btu Liqui d Wast

e As h Feedrat e (lb/hr) 4.0 1 4.0 1 4.1 9 High-Bt u Liqui d Wast

e Feedrat e (lbs/hr ) 1,000.

2 997.7 998.5 High-Bt u Liqui d Wast

e As h Concentratio n (mg/kg ) 1,35

0 1,01 0 1,18 0 High-Bt u Liqui d Wast

e As h Feedrat e (lb/hr) 1.3

5 1.0

1 1.1

8 Specialt y Liqui d Wast

e Feedrat e (lbs/hr ) 270. 8 256.5 296. 7 Specialt y Liqui d Wast

e As h Concentratio n (mg/kg ) 64

9 59

9 59

8 Specialt y Liqui d Wast

e As h Feedrat e (lb/hr) 0.1 8 0.1 5 0.1 8
Containerize

d Soli d Wast

e Feedrat e (lbs/hr ) 734. 9 738. 4 746. 0 Containerize

d Soli d Wast

e As h Concentratio n (mg/kg ) 675,00

0 688,00

0 655,00

0 Containerize

d Soli d Wast

e As h Feedrat e (lb/hr ) 496. 1 508. 0 488. 6 Tota l As h Feedrat e (lb/hr ) 501. 6 513.2 494.2 Averag e As h Feedrate (lb/hr ) 503. 0



### 4-45
VES01777 4

### Tabl e 4-36. Uni t 3 - As h Feedrat

e Durin g th

e EPA Metho

d 5 Stac k

Samplin g fo r PM Run l 10-15-1 3 13:1 6 -14:2 5 Ru n 2

10-16-1 3 11:1 5 -12:2 5 Ru n 3

10-17-1 3 09:50 -10:5 7
Low-Bt u Liqui d Wast

e Feedrat

e (lbs/hr ) 1,292.

9 955.

4 1,357.6 Low-Bt u Liqui d Wast

e As h Concentratio n (mg/kg

) 3,09 0 4,07 0 3,650 As h Feedrat

e (lb/hr ) 4.0 0 3.8 9 4.96 High-Bt u Liqui d Wast

e Feedrat

e (lbs/hr ) 847. 9 818. 2 875.

3 High-Bt u Liqui d Wast

e As h Concentratio n (mg/kg

) 1,26

0 93

7 59

9 High-Bt As h Feedrat e (lb/hr ) 1.0

7 0.7

7 0.5

2 Specialt y Liqui d Wast

e Feedrat

e (lbs/hr ) 307. 9 269. 1 457. 4 Specialt y Liqui d Wast

e As h Concentratio n (mg/kg

) 59 1 62 2 58

8 Specialt As h Feedrat e (lb/hr ) 0.1 8 0.1 7 0.2 7
Containerize

d Soli d Wast

e Feedrat

e (lbs/hr ) 738. 3 742. 1 720.7 Containerize

d Soli d Wast

e As h Concentratio n (mg/kg

) 670,00

0 682,00

0 778,00

0 Containerize As h Feedrat e (lb/hr ) 494. 7 506. 1 560.7 Tota l As h Feedrat

e (lb/hr ) 499. 9 510. 9 566. 5 Averag e As h Feedrat e (lb/hr ) 525. 8



### 4-4 6
VES01777 5

### Tabl e 4-37. Uni t 4 - As h Feedrat

e Durin g th e EPA Metho d 5 Stac k

Samplin g fo r P

M Run l 10-23-1 3 09:30 -10:4 2 Ru n 3

10-25-1 3 09:3 5 - 10:4 0 Ru n 4 10-25-1 3 10:5 0 -11:5 5
Low-Bt u Liqui d Wast

e Feedrat e (lbs/hr ) 1,899.6 1,901.0 1,896. 8 Low-Bt u Liqui d Wast

e As h Concentratio n (mg/kg

) 2,79

0 3,32

0 3,25

0 As h Feedrat

e (lb/hr ) 5.30 6.3 1 6.1 6 High-Bt u Liqui d Wast e Feedrat e (lbs/hr ) 1,101.

4 1,098. 1 1,108. 9 High-Bt u Liqui d Wast e As h Concentratio n (mg/kg

) 1,610 1,50 0 98

9 High-Bt As h Feedrat e (lb/hr ) 1.7

7 1.6

5 1.1

0 Liqui d Wast

e t o SC C Feedrat e (lbs/hr ) 1,095.

6 1,100.

7 1,102.

8 Liqui d Wast

e t o SC C As h Concentratio n (mg/kg

) 74

4 78

7 74

3 As h Feedrat

e (lb/hr ) 0.8

2 0.8

7 0.8

2
Containerize d Soli d Wast e Feedrat e (lbs/hr ) 565. 8 568. 6 553. 8 Containerize d Soli d Wast e As h Concentratio n (mg/kg

) 758,00

0 724,000 771,00 0 Containerize As h Feedrat e (lb/hr ) 428. 9 411. 7 427. 0
Bul k Soli d Wast

e Feedrat e (lbs/hr ) 6,286.

7 6,408. 0 5,992.6 Bul k Soli d Wast

e As h Concentratio n (mg/kg

) 695,00

0 689,000 710,00 0 As h Feedrat

e (lb/hr ) 4,369.2 4,415. 1 4,254.8 Tota l As h Feedrat e (lb/hr ) 4,806. 0 4,835. 6 4,689. 9 Averag e As h Feedrate (lb/hr ) 4,777. 2



### 4-4 7
VES01777 6

### 4.3. 3 Metal s Feedrate s Feedrate s ofth e metal s regulate db y th e HW C MAC T (As , Be , Cd , Cr , Pb , an dHg ) ar e OPL s fo r th e emissio n standard

s fo r SVM , LVM , an

dmercury . The feedrate s o f thes e si x metal s hav e bee n determine

ddurin g th

e metal s stac

k sampling i n th

e secon dpar t o f eac h run . Th e stack ga s concentration s o f

al l si x o f th e HW C MAC T metal s ar

e determinedb y EP A Metho d29 . Table 4-3 8 present

s th e feedrate s o f

these metal s calculate ddurin g stac k sampling fo r

metal s fo r Uni t 2 . Metal s feedrate s fo r

Uni t 3 ar e presente d i n Tabl e 4-40 , an

dmetal s feedrate s fo r

Uni t 4 ar e presente d i n Tabl e 4-42 . Th e OPL s fo r

metal s feedrate s ar

e tota l LV M feedrat

e (i.e. , tota

l an dpumpable

) an d pumpabl e LV M fo r

th e emission standar

d fo r LV M (i.e. , arsenic , beryllium , an dchromium) ; (Total) SV M feedrat

e (i.e. , tota

l an dpumpable

) fo r th e emissio n standar

d fo r SV M (i.e. , cadmiu man dlead) ; an

d(Total) mercur

y feedrat e (i.e. , total an

dpumpable) fo r

th e emissio n standar d fo r mercury . Tabl e 4-3 9 present s th e feedrate s o f

tota l LV M an dpumpabl

e LVM , total SVM , an dmercur y calculatedduring stac

k sampling fo r

metal s fo r

Uni t 2 . Tota l LV M an d pumpabl e LVM , tota

l SVM , an

dmercur y feedrate s fo r

Uni t 3 ar e presente

d i n Tabl e 4-41 , and tota l LV M an dpumpabl

e LVM , tota

l SVM , an

dmercur y feedrate s fo r

Uni t 4 ar e presente d i n Table 4-43 . Fo r th e calculatio n o f

th e metal s feedrates , th

e weigh t ofth e containerizedsoli dwast e use dt o calculat e th e feedrate s o f

metal s wa

s reduce db y th e weigh t o f th e box , an dth e spikin g material s lea

dnitrate , hexachloroethane , an dth e solutio n o f

mercuri c nitrat

e t o determin

e th e feedrat e o f containerize dsoli dwast

e tha t was analyzedfo r

th e metal s As , Be , Cd , Cr , Pb , an d Hg .

4-4 8
VES01777 7

### Tabl e 4-38. Uni t 2 - Metals Feedrate

s Run l Run 3 Ru n 5 10-8-1 3 10-10-1

3 10-30-1

3 15:4 0 -18:4 3 12:3 0 -15:1 0 12:4

5 -15:3 2 Feedrat e (lbs/hr) 1,47 5 1,51 3 1,39 6 Arseni c Con e (mg/kg ) 2. 7 3. 2 2. 1 Berylliu mCon e (mg/kg ) <0.09 7 <0.09 6 <0.097 Cadmiu mCon e (mg/kg ) 7. 2 9 7 Chromiu mCon e (mg/kg ) 0. 8 0.8 8 0.7 4 Lea dCon e (mg/kg ) 1. 1 1. 7 1. 1 Low-Bt u Liqui dWast

e Mercury Con e (mg/kg 0.02 1 0.04 2 0.05 2 Arseni c Feedrat

e (lbs/hr) 0.0039 8 0.0048 4 0.0029 3 Berylliu mFeedrat

e (lbs/hr) <0.0001 4 <0.0001 5 <0.0001 4 Cadmiu mFeedrat

e (lbs/hr) 0.010 6 0.013 6 0.0097 8 Chromiu mFeedrat

e (lbs/hr) 0.0011 8 0.0013 3 0.0010 3 Lea dFeedrat

e (lbs/hr) 0.0016 2 0.0025 7 0.0015 4 Mercury Feedrat

e (lbs/hr) 0.000031 0 0.000063 6 0.000072 6

High-Bt u Liqui dWast

e Feedrat e (lbs/hr) 1,28 9 1,09 9 1,16

5

High-Bt u Liqui dWast

e Arseni c Con e (mg/kg ) 8. 3 2. 8 <0.3 2

High-Bt u Liqui dWast

e Berylliu mCon e (mg/kg ) <0.09 6 <0.09 9 <0.09 6
High-Bt u Liqui dWast

e Cadmiu mCon e (mg/kg ) <0.07 6 <0.07 8 <0.07 6 High-Bt u Liqui dWast

e Chromiu mCon e (mg/kg ) 0.2 6 <0.22 <0.2 1 High-Bt u Liqui dWast

e Lea dCon e (mg/kg ) 1 0.67 6. 7 High-Bt u Liqui dWast

e Mercury Con e (mg/kg 0.02 6 0.02 1 0.09 6 High-Bt Arseni c Feedrat e (lbs/hr) 0.010 7 0.0030 8 <0.0003 7 High-Bt u Liqui dWast

e Berylliu mFeedrat e (lbs/hr) <0.0001 2 <0.0001 1 <0.0001 1 High-Bt u Liqui dWast

e Cadmiu mFeedrat e (lbs/hr) <0.00009 8 <0.00008 6 <0.00008 9 High-Bt u Liqui dWast

e

Chromiu mFeedrat e (lbs/hr) 0.00033 5 <0.0002 4 <0.0002

4 High-Bt u Liqui dWast

e

Lea dFeedrat e (lbs/hr) 0.0012 9 0.00073 6 0.0078 0 High-Bt u Liqui dWast

e

Mercury Feedrat e (lbs/hr) 0.000033 5 0.000023 1 0.00011 2

Specialt y Liqui dWast

e Feedrat e (lbs /hr ) 43 3 42 5 44 5

Specialt y Liqui dWast

e Arseni c Con e (mg/kg ) <0.3 2 <0. 3 <0.3 1

Specialt y Liqui dWast

e Berylliu mCon e (mg/kg ) <0.09 6 <0.09 2 <0.09 3
Specialt y Liqui dWast

e Cadmiu mCon e (mg/kg ) <0.07 6 <0.Q7 3 <0.07 3 Specialt y Liqui dWast

e Chromiu mCon e (mg/kg ) <0.2 1 <0. 2 <0. 2 Specialt y Liqui dWast

e Lea dCon e (mg/kg ) <0.27 <0.2 6 <0.2 6 Specialt y Liqui dWast

e Mercury Con e (mg/kg <0.00 9 <0.008 6 <0.009 9 Specialt Arseni c Feedrat e (lbs /hr ) <0.0001 4 <0.0001 3 <0.0001 4 Specialt y Liqui dWast

e Berylliu mFeedrat e (lbs/hr) <0.00004 2 <0.00003 9 <0.00004 1 Specialt y Liqui dWast

e Cadmiu mFeedrat e (lbs/hr) <0.00003 3 <0.00003 1 <0.00003 3 Specialt y Liqui dWast

e

Chromiu mFeedrat e (lbs/hr) <0.00009 1 <0.00008 5 <0.00008 9 Specialt y Liqui dWast

e

Lea dFeedrat e (lbs/hr) <0.0001 2 <0.0001 1 <0.0001 2 Specialt y Liqui dWast

e

Mercury Feedrat e (lbs/hr) <0.000003 9 <0.000003 7 <0.000004 4

Containerize dSoli dWaste 1 Feedrat e (lbs/hr) 54 7 53 6 54 2

Containerize dSoli dWaste 1 Arseni c Con e (mg/kg ) 8. 8 7. 5 8. 8

Containerize dSoli dWaste 1 Berylliu mCon e (mg/kg ) 0.4 8 0.6 1 0.7 3

Containerize dSoli dWaste 1 Cadmiu mCon e (mg/kg ) 0.08 2 <0.07 7 0.08 4
Containerize dSoli dWaste 1 Chromiu mCon e (mg/kg ) 12. 8 19. 3 16. 7 Containerize dSoli dWaste 1 Lea dCon e (mg/kg ) 11. 6 11. 7 13. 5 Containerize dSoli dWaste 1 Mercury Con e (mg/kg 0.04 5 0.02 2 0.01 6 Containerize dSoli dWaste 1 Arseni c Feedrat e (lbs/hr) 0.0048 1 0.0040 2 0.0047 7 Containerize dSoli dWaste 1 Berylliu mFeedrat e (lbs/hr) 0.00026 3 0.000327 0.00039 6 Containerize dSoli dWaste 1
Cadmiu mFeedrat e (lbs/hr) 0.000044 9 <0.00004 1 0.000045 6 Containerize dSoli dWaste 1

Chromiu mFeedrat e (lbs /hr ) 0.0070 0 0.010 3 0.0090 6 Containerize dSoli dWaste 1

Lea dFeedrat e (lbs /hr ) 0.0063 5 0.0062 7 0.0073 2 Containerize dSoli dWaste 1

Mercury Feedrat e (lbs/hr) 0.000024 6 0.000011 8 0.0000086 8


### 4-4 9
VES01777 8

### Tabl e 4-38. (continued ) Uni t 2 - Metal s Feedrate

s Run l 10-8-1 3 15:4 0 -18:4 3 Run 3 10-10-1 3 12:3 0 -15:1 0 Ru n 5

10-30-1 3 12:4 5 -15:3 2
Spikin g Arseni c Feedrat e (lbs/hr) 0 0 0 Spikin g Berylliu mFeedrat e (lbs/hr) 0 0 0 Spikin g Cadmiu mFeedrat e (lbs/hr ) 0 0 0 Spikin g Chromiu mFeedrat e (lbs/hr) 45. 8 47. 3 45. 8 Spikin g Lea dFeedrat e (lbs/hr ) 61. 9 61. 7 62. 0 Spikin g Mercury Feedrat e (lbs/hr) 0.0019 6 0.0019 6 0.00204 Pumpabl e Feedrate 2 Arseni c Feedrat e (lbs/hr) 0.014 7 0.0079 2 0.0029 3 Pumpabl e Feedrate 2 Berylliu mFeedrat e (lbs/hr) 0 0 0 Pumpabl e Feedrate 2 Cadmiu mFeedrat e (lbs/hr) 0.010 6 0.013 6 0.0097 8 Pumpabl e Feedrate 2 Chromiu mFeedrat e (lbs/hr ) 45. 8 47. 3 45. 9 Pumpabl e Feedrate 2 Lea dFeedrat e (lbs/hr) 0.0029 1 0.0033 1 0.0093 4 Pumpabl e Feedrate 2 Mercury Feedrat e (lbs/hr ) 0.000064 5 0.000086 6 0.00018 4
Tota l Feedrate 2 Arseni c Feedrat e (lbs/hr) 0.019 5 0.011 9 0.0077 1 Tota l Feedrate 2 Berylliu mFeedrat e (lbs/hr) 0.00026 3 0.00032 7 0.00039 6 Tota l Feedrate 2 Cadmiu mFeedrat e (lbs/hr) 0.0107 0.013 6 0.0098 2 Tota l Feedrate 2 Chromiu mFeedrat e (lbs/hr) 45. 8 47. 3 45. 9 Tota l Feedrate 2 Lea dFeedrat e (lbs/hr ) 61. 9 61. 7 62. 0 Tota l Feedrate 2 Mercur y Feedrat e (lbs/hr) 0.0020 5 0.0020 6 0.0022 4

' Th e weigh

t ofth e Containerize dSoli dWast e use d t o calculate th

e feedrate s o f

chlorin e and metal s ha

s bee n reduced b y th e weigh t o f th e box , and th

e spikin g material s lead nitrate , hexachloroethane , an d th e solutio n o f

mercuri c nitrate
.
2Non-detect s treate

d a s azero "0" .



### 4-5 0
VES01777 9

### Tabl e 4-39. Uni t 2 - HW C MAC T Metal s Feedrate

s
Unit s Run l 10-8-1 3 15:4 0 -18:4 3 Ru n 3 10-10-1 3 12:3 0 -15:1 0 Run 5

10-30-1 3 12:4 5 -15:3 2 Averag

e Arseni c (Total ) lb/hr 0.019 5 0.011 9 0.007 7 0.013 0 Berylliu m(Total ) lb/h r 0.0002 6 0.0003 3 0.0004 0 0.0003 3 Chromiu m(Total ) lb/h r 45. 8 47. 3 45. 9 46. 3 Tota l LV M (Arsenic, Beryllium ,

Chromium

) lb/h r 45.

9 473 45. 9 46.

3 Arseni c (Pumpable ) lb/h r 0.014 7 0.007 9 0.002 9 0.008 5 Berylliu m(Pumpable ) lb/h r 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.0000 0.0000 Chromiu m(Pumpable ) lb/h r 45. 8 47. 3 45. 9 46. 3 Pumpabl e LV M (Arsemc

, Beryllium , Chromium

) lb/h r 45.

9 47.

3 45.

9 46.

3 Cadmiu m lb/h r 0.0107 0.013 6 0.009 8 0.011 4 Lea d lb/h r 61. 9 61. 7 62. 0 61. 9

Tota l SV M (Cadmium, Lead ) lb/h r 61.

9 61.

7 62.

0 61.

9 Mercur y lb/h r 0.0020

5 0.0020

6 0.0022

4 0.0021

2



### 4-5 1
VES01778 0

### Tabl e 4-40. Uni t 3 - Metal s Feedrate

s Run 2 Run 3 Ru n 4 10-16-1 3 10-17-1

3 10-18-1

3 14:0 0 -16:5 0 12:3 0 -15:2 5 09:3 5 -12:2 0 Feedrat e (lbs/hr) 1,78 8 1,685 1,70 7 Arseni c Con e (mg/kg ) 4. 8 3. 2 3. 3 Berylliu mCon e (mg/kg ) <0.09 6 <0.097 <0.09 6

Low-Bt u Liqui dWast

e Cadmiu mCon e (mg/kg ) 15. 2 9. 4 11. 3
Low-Bt u Liqui dWast

e Chromiu mCon e (mg/kg ) 1. 3 0.8 7 0.9 7 Low-Bt u Liqui dWast

e LeadCon e (mg/kg ) 3. 1 1.9 1.9 Low-Bt u Liqui dWast

e Mercur

y Con e (mg/k

g 0.06 5 0.04 9 0.0 8 Arseni c Feedrat

e (lbs/hr) 0.0085 8 0.0053 9 0.0056 3 Low-Bt u Liqui dWast

e Berylliu mFeedrat e (Ibs/hr ) <0.0001 7 <0.0001 6 <0.0001 6 Low-Bt u Liqui dWast

e Cadmiu mFeedrat e (lbs/hr) 0.027 2 0.015 8 0.019 3 Low-Bt u Liqui dWast

e

Chromiu mFeedrat e (lbs/hr) 0.0023 2 0.00147 0.0016 6 Low-Bt u Liqui dWast

e

Lea dFeedrat e (lbs/hr) 0.0055 4 0.0032 0 0.0032 4 Low-Bt u Liqui dWast

e

Mercury Feedrat e (lbs/hr) 0.00011 6 0.000082 6 0.00013 7

High-Btu Liqui dWast

e Feedrat e (lbs/hr) 1,04

4 1,16

7 1,19 8

High-Btu Liqui dWast

e Arsemc Con e (mg/kg ) 12. 4 1. 7 2. 4

High-Btu Liqui dWast

e Berylliu mCon e (mg/kg ) <0.09 5 <0. 1 <0.09 6
High-Btu Liqui dWast

e Cadmiu mCon e (mg/kg ) <0.07 5 <0.07 9 <0.07 6 High-Btu Liqui dWast

e Chromiu mCon e (mg/kg ) <0.2 1 <0.22 <0.2 1 High-Btu Liqui dWast

e LeadCon e (mg/kg ) 1. 8 1 1. 3 High-Btu Liqui dWast

e Mercur

y Con e (mg/k

g 0.027 0.02 9 0.02 2 High-Bt Arseni c Feedrat e (lbs/hr) 0.012 9 0.0019 8 0.0028 7 High-Btu Liqui dWast

e Berylliu mFeedrat e (lbs/hr) <0.00009 9 <0.0001 2 <0.0001 1 High-Btu Liqui dWast

e Cadmiu mFeedrat e (lbs/hr) <0.00007 8 <0.00009 2 <0.00009 1 High-Btu Liqui dWast

e

Chromiu mFeedrat e (lbs/hr) <0.0002 2 <0.0002 6 <0.0002 5 High-Btu Liqui dWast

e

LeadFeedrat e (lbs/hr) 0.0018 8 0.0011 7 0.0015 6 High-Btu Liqui dWast

e

Mercury Feedrat e (lbs/hr) 0.000028 2 0.000033 8 0.000026 3

Specialt y Liqui dWast

e Feedrat e (lbs/hr) 20 3 35 0 24 5

Specialt y Liqui dWast

e Arseni c Con e (mg/kg ) <0.3 2 <0.3 2 <0.3 3

Specialt y Liqui dWast

e Berylliu mCon e (mg/kg ) <0.09 8 <0.09 6 <0.09 9
Specialt y Liqui dWast

e Cadmiu mCon e (mg/kg ) <0.07 7 <0.07 6 <0.07 8 Specialt y Liqui dWast

e Chromiu mCon e (mg/kg ) <0.22 <0.2 1 <0.2 2 Specialt y Liqui dWast

e . Lea dCon e (mg/kg ) <0.2 7 <0.2

7 <0.2 8 Specialt y Liqui dWast

e Mercury Con e (mg/k g <0.008 8 <0.009 4 <0.009 9 Specialt Arseni c Feedrat e (lbs/hr) <0.00006 5 <0.0001 1 <0.00008 1 Specialt y Liqui dWast

e Berylliu mFeedrat e (lbs/hr) <0.00002 0 <0.00003 4 <0.00002 4 Specialt y Liqui dWast

e Cadmiu mFeedrat e (lbs/hr) <0.00001 6 <0.00002 7 <0.00001 9 Specialt y Liqui dWast

e

Chromiu mFeedrat e (lbs/hr) <0.00004 5 <0.00007 3 <0.00005 4 Specialt y Liqui dWast

e

LeadFeedrat e (lbs/hr) <0.00005 5 <0.00009 4 <0.00006 9 Specialt y Liqui dWast

e

Mercur

y Feedrat e (lbs/hr) <0.000001 8 <0.000003 3 •cO.000002 4

Containerize dSoli dWaste 1 Feedrat e (lbs/hr) 54 2 53 7 524

Containerize dSoli dWaste 1 Arseni c Con e (mg/kg ) 7. 5 6. 4 8. 4

Containerize dSoli dWaste 1 Berylliu mCon e (mg/kg ) 0.5 8 0.5 5 0.7 9

Containerize dSoli dWaste 1 Cadmiu mCon e (mg/kg ) <0.07 1 <0.07 6 <0.07 1
Containerize dSoli dWaste 1 Chromiu mCon e (mg/kg ) 13. 6 13. 7 18. 9 Containerize dSoli dWaste 1 Lea dCon e (mg/kg ) 11. 1 10. 7 14. 1 Containerize dSoli dWaste 1 Mercury Con e (mg/k g 0.02 8 0.02 8 0.02 6 Containerize dSoli dWaste 1 Arseni c Feedrat e (lbs/hr) 0.0040 6 0.0034 3 0.0044 0 Containerize dSoli dWaste 1 Berylliu mFeedrat e (lbs/hr) 0.00031 4 0.00029 5 0.00041 4 Containerize dSoli dWaste 1
Cadmiu mFeedrat e (lbs/hr ) <0.00003 8 <0.00004 1 <0.00003 7 Containerize dSoli dWaste 1

Chromiu mFeedrat e (lbs/hr ) 0.0073 7 0.0073 5 0.0099 0 Containerize dSoli dWaste 1

Lea dFeedrat e (lbs/hr) 0.0060 1 0.0057 4 0.00739 3 Containerize dSoli dWaste 1

Mercur y Feedrat e (lbs/hr) 0.000015 2 0.000015 0 0.000013 6


### 4-5 2
VES01778 1

### Tabl e 4-40. (continued ) Uni t 3 - Metai s Feedrate

s Ru n 2 10-16-1 3 14:0 0 -16:5 0 Ru n 3 10-17-1 3 12:3 0 -15:2 5 Ru n 4 10-18-1 3 09:3 5 -12:2 0
Spikin g Arseni c Feedrat e (lbs/hr ) 0 0 0 Spikin g Berylliu mFeedrat e (lbs/hr ) 0 0 0 Spikin g Cadmiu mFeedrat e (lbs/hr ) 0 0 0 Spikin g Chromiu mFeedrat e (lbs/hr ) 46. 3 46. 1 45. 7 Spikin g Lea dFeedrat e (lbs/hr ) 62. 1 62. 5 62. 2 Spikin g Mercury Feedrat e (lbs/hr ) 0.00204 0.00200 0.0020 9 Pumpabl e Feedrate 2 Arseni c Feedrat e (lbs/hr ) 0.021 5 0.0073 8 0.0085 1 Pumpabl e Feedrate 2 Berylliu mFeedrat e (lbs/hr ) 0 0 0 Pumpabl e Feedrate 2 Cadmiu mFeedrat e (lbs/hr) 0.027 2 0.015 8 0.019 3 Pumpabl e Feedrate 2 Chromiu mFeedrat e (lbs/hr ) 46. 3 46. 1 45. 7 Pumpabl e Feedrate 2 Lea dFeedrat e (lbs/hr) 0.0074 2 0.0043 7 0.0048 0 Pumpabl e Feedrate 2 Mercury Feedrat e (lbs/hr) 0.000144 0.00011 6 0.00016 3
Tota l Feedrate 2 Arsem c Feedrat e (lbs/hr) 0.025 6 0.010 8 0.012 9 Tota l Feedrate 2 Berylliu mFeedrat e (lbs/hr ) 0.00031 4 0.00029 5 0.00041 4 Tota l Feedrate 2 Cadmiu mFeedrat e (lbs/hr) 0.027 2 0.015 8 0.019 3 Tota l Feedrate 2 Chromiu mFeedrat e (lbs/hr) 46. 3 46. 1 45. 7 Tota l Feedrate 2 Lea dFeedrat e (lbs/hr) 62. 1 62. 5 62. 2 Tota l Feedrate 2 Mercury Feedrat e (lbs/hr) 0.0022 0 0.0021 3 0.0022 6

1 Th e weight

o f th e Containerize dSoli dWast e use d t o calculat e th e feedrate s o f

chlorin e an

d metal s ha

s been reduced b y th

e weigh t o f th e box , and th

e spikin g material s lea d nitrate , hexachloroethane , an d th e solutio n o f mercuri c nitrate
.
2Non-detect s treated as azer o "0" . / 

### Tabl e 4-41 . Uni t 3 - HW C MAC T Metal s Feedrate

s Unit s Run 2 10-16-1 3 14:0 0 -16:5 0 Ru n 3 10-17-1 3 12:30-15:2

5 Ru n 4 10-18-1 3 09:3 5 -12:2 0 Averag

e Arseni c (Total ) lb/h r 0.025 6 0.010 8 0.012 9 0.016 4 Berylliu m(Total ) lb/h r 0.0003 1 0.0003 0 0.0004 1 0.0003 4 Chromium(Total ) lb/h r 46. 3 46. 1 45. 7 46. 0 Tota l LV M (Arsenic, Beryllium , Chromium ) lb/h r 46.

3 46. 1 45. 8 46. 1 Arseni c (Pumpable ) lb/h r 0.0215 2 0.0073 8 0.0085 1 0.0124 7 Berylliu m(Pumpable ) lb/hr 0.0000 0 0.0000 0 0.0000 0 0.00000 0 Chromium(Pumpable ) Ib/h r 46. 3 46. 1 45. 7 46. 0 Pumpabl e LV M (Arsenic, Beryllium , Chromium ) Ib/h r 46.

3 46. 1 45. 7 46.0 Cadmium lb/h r 0.0271 7 0.0158 4 0.0192 9 0.0207 7 Lea d lb/h r 62. 1 62. 5 62. 2 62. 3

Tota l SV M (Cadmium, Lead) lb/hr 62. 1 62. 5 62.

2 62.

3 Mercur y lb/hr 0.0022

0 0.0021

3 0.0022

6 0.0022

0



### 4-5 3
VES01778 2

### Tabl e 4-42 . Uni t 4 - Metal s Feedrate

s Run l Ru n 2 Ru n 3 10-23-1 3 10-24-1

3 10-25-1

3 12:3 6 -15:2 0 12:3 5 -15:1 5 13:3

5 -16:1 1 Feedrat e (lbs/hr) 1,979 1,98 7 1,99

9 Arseni c Con e (mg/kg ) 5. 5 4. 9 2. 9 Berylliu mCon e (mg/kg ) <0.094 <0.09 8 <0.09 6 Cadmiu mCon e (mg/kg ) 13. 6 12. 1 9. 4 Chromiu mCon e (mg/kg ) 1. 3 1. 2 0.8 4 Lea dCon e (mg/kg ) 3. 3 2. 9 1.6 Low-Bt u Liqui dWast

e t o Kil n Mercury Con e (mg/k g 0.1 1 0.1 4 0.1 1 Arseni c Feedrat

e (lbs/hr) 0.010 9 0.0097 3 0.0058 0 Berylliu mFeedrat

e (lbs/hr ) <0.0001 9 <0.0001 9 <0.0001 9 Cadmiu mFeedrat

e (lbs/hr ) 0.026 9 0.024 0 0.018 8 Chromiu mFeedrat

e (lbs/hr) 0.0025 7 0.0023 8 0.0016 8 LeadFeedrat

e (lbs/hr ) 0.0065 3 0.0057 6 0.0032 0 Mercury Feedrat

e (lbs/hr ) 0.00021 8 0.00027 8 0.00022 0

High-Bt u Liqui dWast

e t o Kil n Feedrat e (lbs/hr) 1,18

9 1,20 1 1,20 2

High-Bt u Liqui dWast

e t o Kil n Arseni c Con e (mg/kg ) 1. 4 0.3 7 <0.3 2

High-Bt u Liqui dWast

e t o Kil n Berylliu mCon e (mg/kg ) <0.09 9 <0.09 3 <0.097
High-Bt u Liqui dWast

e t o Kil n Cadmiu mCon e (mg/kg ) 0.1 2 <0.07 3 <0.077 High-Bt u Liqui dWast

e t o Kil n Chromiu mCon e (mg/kg ) 0.2 4 <0. 2 <0.2 1 High-Bt u Liqui dWast

e t o Kil n Lea dCon e (mg/kg ) 1. 1 0. 4 <0.2 7 High-Bt u Liqui dWast

e t o Kil n Mercury Con e (mg/k g 0.04 8 0.02 1 0.01 8 High-Bt Arseni c Feedrat e (lbs/hr) 0.0016 6 0.00044 4 <0.0003 8 High-Bt u Liqui dWast

e t o Kil n Berylliu mFeedrat e (lbs/hr) <0.0001 2 <0.0001 1 <0.0001 2 High-Bt u Liqui dWast

e t o Kil n Cadmiu mFeedrat e (lbs/hr ) 0.00014 3 <0.00008 8 <0.00009 3 High-Bt u Liqui dWast

e t o Kil n

Chromiu mFeedrat e (lbs/hr) 0.00028 5 <0.0002 4 <0.00025 High-Bt u Liqui dWast

e t o Kil n

Lea dFeedrat e (lbs/hr ) 0.0013 1 0.00048 0 <0.0003 2 High-Bt u Liqui dWast

e t o Kil n

Mercur

y Feedrat e (lbs/hr) 0.000057 1 0.000025 2 0.000021 6

Liqui dWast

e t o SC C Feedrat e (lbs/hr) 1,18 6 1,20 2 1,19 6

Liqui dWast

e t o SC C Arseni c Con e (mg/kg ) <0. 3 <0.3 2 <0.3 1

Liqui dWast

e t o SC C Berylliu mCon e (mg/kg ) <0.09 2 <0.09 8 <0.094
Liqui dWast

e t o SC C Cadmiu mCon e (mg/kg ) <0.07 3 <0.07 7 <0.07 4 Liqui dWast

e t o SC C Chromiu mCon e (mg/kg ) <0. 2 <0.22 <0.2 1 Liqui dWast

e t o SC C Lea dCon e (mg/kg ) 0.2 6 <0.2 7 <0.2 6 Liqui dWast

e t o SC C Mercury Con e (mg/k g 0.01 7 0.01 9 0.01 7 Arseni c Feedrat

e (lbs/hr ) <0.0003 6 <0.0003 8 <0.0003 7 Liqui dWast

e t o SC C Berylliu mFeedrat e (lbs/hr ) <0.0001 1 <0.0001 2 <0.0001 1 Liqui dWast

e t o SC C
Cadmiu mFeedrat e (lbs/hr ) <0.00008 7 <0.00009 3 <0.00008 9 Liqui dWast

e t o SC C

Chromiu mFeedrat e (lbs/hr ) <0.0002

4 <0.0002 6 <0.00025 Liqui dWast

e t o SC C

Lea dFeedrat e (lbs/hr ) 0.00030 8 <0.0003 2 <0.0003 1 Liqui dWast

e t o SC C

Mercur y Feedrat e (lbs/hr ) 0.000020 2 0.000022 8 0.000020 3

Containerize dSoh d Waste 1 Feedrat e (lbs/hr ) 51 4 505 50 8

Containerize dSoh d Waste 1 Arseni c Con e (mg/kg ) 2. 4 2 2. 1

Containerize dSoh d Waste 1 Berylliu mCon e (mg/kg ) 0.1 3 0.1 6 <0. 1

Containerize dSoh d Waste 1 Cadmiu mCon e (mg/kg ) 0.4 6 0.4 3 0.4 5
Containerize dSoh d Waste 1 Chromiu mCon e (mg/kg ) 45. 2 58. 9 35. 1 Containerize dSoh d Waste 1 Lea dCon e (mg/kg ) 35. 9 21 2 25. 4 Containerize dSoh d Waste 1 Mercury Con e (mg/k g 0.1 8 0.2 4 0.2 6 Containerize dSoh d Waste 1 Arseni c Feedrat e (lbs/hr ) 0.0012 3 0.0010 1 0.00107 Containerize dSoh d Waste 1 Berylliu mFeedrat e (lbs/hr) 0.000066 8 0.000080 9 <0.00005 1 Containerize dSoh d Waste 1
Cadmiu mFeedrat e (lbs/hr ) 0.00023 7 0.00021 7 0.00022 8 Containerize dSoh d Waste 1

Chromiu mFeedrat e (lbs/hr ) 0.023 2 0.029 8 0.017 8 Containerize dSoh d Waste 1

Lea dFeedrat e (lbs/hr ) 0.018 5 0.10 7 0.012 9 Containerize dSoh d Waste 1

Mercury Feedrat e (lbs/hr ) 0.000092 6 0.00012 1 0.00013 2


### 4-5 4
VES01778 3

### Tabl e 4-42 . (continued ) Uni t 4 - Metal s Feedrate

s Run l 10-23-1 3 12:3 6 -15:2 0 Ru n 2 10-24-1 3 12:3 5 -15:1 5 Ru

n 3 10-25-1 3 13:3 5 -16:1 1

Bul k Soli dWast

e Feedrat e (lbs/hr) 525 1 559 8 534 5

Bul k Soli dWast

e Arseni c Con e (mg/kg ) 2. 2 3 2. 2

Bul k Soli dWast

e Berylliu mCon e (mg/kg ) 0.2 1 0.2 8 0.2 6

Bul k Soli dWast

e Cadmiu mCon e (mg/kg ) 0.2 8 0.3 7 0. 3
Bul k Soli dWast

e Chromiu mCon e (mg/kg ) 35. 6 37. 9 29. 8 Bul k Soli dWast

e Lea dCon e (mg/kg ) 4 1 58. 1 26. 6 Bul k Soli dWast

e Mercur y Con e (mg/kg 0.08 2 0.1 2 0.07 7

Arseni c Feedrat

e (lbs/hr) 0.011 6 0.016 8 0.011 8 Bul k Soli dWast

e Berylliu mFeedrat e (lbs/hr) 0.0011 0 0.0015 7 0.0013 9 Bul k Soli dWast

e Cadmiu mFeedrat e (lbs/hr) 0.0014 7 0.00207 0.0016 0 Bul k Soli dWast

e

Chromiu mFeedrat e (lbs/hr) 0.18 7 0.21 2 0.15 9 Bul k Soli dWast

e

Lea dFeedrat e (lbs/hr) 0.21 5 0.32 5 0.14 2 Bul k Soli dWast

e

Mercury Feedrat e (lbs/hr) 0.00043 1 0.00067 2 0.00041 2 Spikin g Arseni c Feedrat e (lbs/hr) 0 0 0 Spikin g Berylliu mFeedrat e (lbs/hr) 0 0 0 Spikin g Cadmiu mFeedrat e (lbs/hr) 0 0 0 Spikin g Chromiu mFeedrat e (lbs/hr) 46. 0 46. 0 45. 8 Spikin g Lea dFeedrat e (lbs/hr) 62. 0 61. 1 62. 0 Spikin g Mercury Feedrat e (lbs/hr) 0.039 3 0.038 8 0.039 4 Pumpabl e Feedrate 2 Arseni c Feedrat e (lbs/hr) 0.012 5 0.010 2 0.0058 0 Pumpabl e Feedrate 2 Berylliu mFeedrat e (lbs/hr) 0 0 0 Pumpabl e Feedrate 2 Cadmiu mFeedrat e (lbs/hr) 0.027 1 0.024 0 0.018 8 Pumpabl e Feedrate 2 Chromiu mFeedrat e (lbs/hr) 46. 0 46. 0 45. 8 Pumpabl e Feedrate 2 Lea dFeedrat e (lbs/hr) 0.0081 5 0.00624 0.00320 Pumpabl e Feedrate 2 Mercury Feedrat e (lbs/hr) 0.00029 5 0.00032 6 0.00026 2

Tota l Feedrate 2 Arseni c Feedrat e (lbs/hr) 0.025 3 0.028 0 0.018 6 Tota l Feedrate 2 Berylliu mFeedrat e (lbs/hr) 0.0011 7 0.0016 5 0.0013 9 Tota l Feedrate 2 Cadmiu mFeedrat e (lbs/hr) 0.028 8 0.026 3 0.020 6 Tota l Feedrate 2 Chromiu mFeedrat e (lbs/hr) 46. 2 46. 3 46. 0 Tota l Feedrate 2 Lea dFeedrat e (lbs/hr) 62. 2 61. 5 62. 2 Tota l Feedrate 2 Mercury Feedrat e (lbs/hr) 0.040 2 0.039 9 0.040 2

1 Th e weigh

t o f the Containerize dSoli dWast e use d t o calculate the feedrate s o f chlorin e and metal s ha

s bee n reduced b y the weigh t o f th e box , an d fh e spikin g material s lea d nitrate , hexachloroethane , an d th e solutio n o f

mercuri c nitrate
. Non-detect s treate

d a s azer o "0" .



### 4-5 5
VES01778 4

### Tabl e 4-43 . Uni t 4 - HW C MAC T Metal s Feedrate

s Unit s Run l Ru n 3 Run 5 Average Unit s 10-8-1

3 15:4 0 -18:4 3 10-10-1

3 12:3 0 -15:1 0 10-30-1

3 12:4 5 -15:3 2 Average Arseni c (Total ) lb/h r 0.025 3 0.028 0 0.018 6 0.024 0 Berylliu m(Total ) lb/h r 0.0011 7 0.0016 5 0.0013 9 0.0014 0 Chromiu m(Total ) lb/h r 46. 2 46. 3 46. 0 46. 1 Tota l LV M (Arsenic

, Beryllium , Chromium

) lb/h r 46.

2 46.

3 46.

0 46.

2 Arseni c (Pumpable ) lb/h r 0.012 5 0.010 2 0.005 8 0.009 5 Berylliu m(Pumpable ) Ib/h r 0.0000 0 0.0000 0 0.0000 0 0.00000 0 Chromiu m(Pumpable ) lb/h r 46. 0 46. 0 45. 8 45. 9 Pumpabl

e LV M (Arsenic

, Beryllium , Chromium ) lb/h r 46.

0 46.

0 45.

8 45. 9 Cadmiu m lb/h r 0.028 8 0.026 3 0.020 6 0.025 2 Lead lb/h r 62. 2 61. 5 62. 2 62. 0

Tota l SV M (Cadmium, Lead ) lb/h r 62.

2 61.

6 62.

2 62. 0 Mercur y lb/h r 0.040

2 0.039

9 0.040

2 0.O40

1



### 4-5 6
VES01778 5

## 5.0 Qualit y Assurance/Quality Contro l A s par t o f th e comprehensiv

e performanc e test, aproject-specifi c qualit y assurance/qualit

y contro l (QA/QC ) effort

wa s developedandimplemented
. Thi s QA/Q C effor t wa s documente

d i n th e QAPjP , an

dwa s tailore dt

o mee t th e specifi c need

s of thi s test effort
. Th e result s ofth e QA/Q C activitie

s demonstrat

e tha tth e qualit y o f projec t measuremen

tdat a i s wel l documente

d an d tha tth e dat a ar e reliable , defensible

, an d mee tprojec tobjectives

. Th e primar y objective s o f

th e QA/Q C effor

t wer e t o control , assess , an

ddocumen

t data quality
. T o accomplis h thes e objectives , the QA/Q C approac h consiste do f

th e followin g key elements :

• Definitio n o f

qualit y assuranc

e objective s tha

t reflec t th e overal l technica

l objective s o f th e measuremen

t program ;
• Desig n o f

asampling , analytical , QA/Q C an ddat aanalysi s syste

mt o mee t thos e objectives ;
• Evaluatio n o f

th e performanc e o f

th e measuremen

t system ; an

d

• Initiatio n o f

corrective actio n when measuremen t syste mperformanc e doe s no

t mee t th e specification s Th e CP T o f th e incinerator

s a t Veoli aSauge

t wa s conductedi n accordance wit h th e Q A procedure s describe di n th e Quality Assurance Project Plan for the Comprehensive Performance Test ofthe Units 2 and

3 Fixed Hearth Incinerators and the Unit 4 Rotary Kiln Incinerator, September

25, 2013. Thes e Q A procedure s include sampling an danalytica

l procedures , alon g wit h specifie dcalibratio n requirements , Q C checks , dat areductio n an

dvalidatio n procedures , an dsampl e tracking
. A revie

w of analytical result s fo r

QA/Q C sample s an

dassessmen

t o f overall dat

aqualit y i s presente

d i n thi s section
. Detaile dQ C informatio n i s presente d i n th e appendices t

o thi s report . Th e section s below presen

t discussion s o f

th e QA/Q C activitie s associate d wit h th e overall qualit

y ofth e dat

aassociate

d wit h th e CPT . Althoug h severa

l minor issue s ar e identifie d an ddiscussedi n th

e followin g sections , th

e overal l conclusio n o f

th e QA/Q C assessmen

t i s tha t th e result s o f th e testin g ar e o f high quality , an

dar e appropriat

e fo r thei r intendeduse . A fe w mino

r issue s wer

e identifie ddurin g th

e QA/Q C assessment . These issue s an dthei r impac t on dat ausabilit y ar e discussedi n greate

r detai l i n followin g sections
. 5- 1

### 5.1 Audi t Sample s Audi t sample s wer

e acquire dfro maSigma-Aldric h RT C fo r metal s an dhydroge n chloride
. Thes e sample s wer e submittedt

o th e analytica

l laborator y alon g wit h th e sample s collecte ddurin g th

e CPT . Thes e result s ar

e include don th

e laborator

y report s generate d by Tes t America
. Th e evaluation of th e results b y Sigm aAldric h RT C i s presente d i n Appendi x G6 . The results ofth e audi

t sample s ar

e summarizedi n Tabl e 5-1 . Laborator y analysi s o f

eac h audi t sampl e wa s rated a s "Acceptable"
. Tabl e 5-1 . Result

s o f Analysi s o

f Audit Sample

s Resul t Assigne d

Valu e Evaluatio n Metal s o n Filte r Arseni c (ug/filter) 20.3 1 21. 0 Acceptabl e Berylliu m (pig/filter

) 12.1 6 11. 3 Acceptabl e Cadmium (ug/filter) 11.7 2 11.

2 Acceptabl e Chromium (u.g/filter

) 17.6 7 16. 1 Acceptabl e Lea d (u.g/filter

) 21.60 21. 0 Acceptabl e Metal s i n Impinge r Solutio n Arseni c (ug/ml

) 0.188 4 0.20 1 Acceptabl e Berylliu m (|ig/ml ) 0.057 6 0.053

0 Acceptabl e Cadmiu m (ug/ml) 0.105 3 0.10

5 Acceptabl e Chromium (ug/ml) 0.201 7 0.20 2 Acceptabl e Lea d (ug/ml

) 0.210 2 0.20

2 Acceptabl e Mercur y (ng/ml) 13.9 15. 0 Acceptabl e Hydroge n Chlorid e i n Impinge r Solutio n (mg/L ) 30. 4 27. 6 Acceptabl e 

### 5. 2 Analysi s o

f Wast e Feed s 5.2. 1 Analysi s o

f Wast e Feed s fo r Metal s Sample s o f

wast e fee dmaterial s wer

e analyzedfo r

mercur y using CVAA , accordin g t o SW-84 6 Metho d7470A . These sam e sample s wer

e als o analyze dfo r

arsenic , beryllium , cadmium , chromium , an

dlea dusin g ICPES , according t o SW-84 6 Metho d6010B . Thes e samples wer

e prepare d fo r analysi s usin g appropriat e extractio n o r

dilutio n techniques
. Quality assuranc e an dqualit y contro l activitie s associatedwit h these analyse s included :

• Sampl e handling an

dpreservation ;
• Preparation an

danalysi s o f

sample s withi n specifie dholdin g times ;
• Preparation an

danalysi s o f

laborator y blanks ;
5- 2
VES01778 7

### • Preparatio n an d analysi s o f

laborator y contro l samples ;
• Duplicat

e preparatio

n an danalysi s o f

receive dsamples ;
• Analysi s o f

duplicat e samples ; an

d

• Preparatio

n an d analysi s o f

matri x spik

e (MS ) an dmatrix spik

e duplicat e (MSD ) samples
. Revie w o f

thes e QA/Q C activitie s indicate s tha t these dat aar e supportable , an

duseable
. Seeth e detaile d dat

aqualit y assessmen

t i n Appendi x H . Th

e followin g issue s wer

e identifie da s par t o f thi s dat aqualit y assessment :

• Th e QAPj P specifie s th

e performanc e o f

matrix spike/matri x spik

e duplicate s wit

h 75-125 % recovery , 0-20 % RP D fo r mercur y an d70-130 % recovery , 0-20 % RP D fo r othe r metals
. On

e hundre d eighty-seven o f

20 4 M S o r MS D me t th e specification s fo r recovery . On

e hundre do f 10 2 MS/MS D pair s me

t th e specificatio n fo r

RPD . Th e followin g sample s wer

e outsid e th e specification :

—VS2-CS-11B-COMP2B : Arseni c recover y 67 % i n MS , arsenic RP D 23% , chromiu mrecover y 149 % an

d172 % i n MS/MSD ;

—VS2-CS-15B-COMP2B : chromiu mrecover y 150 % i n MSD ;

—VS3-CS-12B-COMP2B : chromiu mrecover y 13 1 an d145 % i n MS/MSD ;

—VS4-BS-13B-COMP2B : chromiu mrecover y 13 2 an d134 % i n MS/MSD , lea

d recover y 208 % i n MSD ;

—VS4-CS-13B-COMP2B : chromiumrecover y 16 4 an d186 % i n MS/MSD , lea

d recover y 406 % i n MS , lea

dRP D 49% , mercur

y recover y 6 1 an d45 % i n MS/MSD ; an

d

—VS4-LBW-12B-COMP2B : cadmiumrecover y 145 % i n MSD , mercur

y recover y 7 1 an d 66 % i n MS/MSD . Metal s feedrate s ar

e developeda

s asu mo f total s fe dt

o th e syste ma s LV M (arsenic , berylliu man

d chromium) ; SV M (cadmiu man dlead ) an dmercury . Th

e MS/MS D outlier s detailed abov

e indicat e increaseduncertaint

y i n th e concentration s o f

th e metal s i n thos e streams . Th e contributio n o f

these stream

s t o th e tota l feedrate s o f LVM , SV M an

d mercur y ar e negligible , an

dth e increaseduncertaint

y i n thes e concentration s ha

s n o impact on th e conclusion s o f

th e report . N o dat

aar e qualifie d o r invalidate d base

do n MS/MS D results
.

5- 3
VES01778 8

### 5.2. 2 Analysi s o f Wast e Feed s fo r Physica l an d Chemica l Parameter s Sample s o f

liqui dan dsoli dwast

e fee dmaterial s wer

e analyzedfo r

as h content, tota

l chlorine , density , gros s calorifi c value , kinemati c viscosity , an dpercen t moisture , using th

e followin g methods :

• As h Content : ASTMD482 ; • Total Chlorine : KNOXWC-0016 ;
• Density : AST M D1963 ; • Gros s Calorifi c Value : AST M D240 , AST M D5865 ;
• Kinemati c Viscosity : AST M D 445 ; an d
• Percen

t Moisture : Metho d160.3 , AST M D017 . Qualit y assurance an

dqualit y contro l activitie s associatedwit h these analyse s included :

• Sampl e handling an

dpreservation ;
• Preparation an

danalysi s o f

sample s withi n specifie dholdin g times ; • Preparation an

danalysi s o f

laborator y blanks ;
• Preparation an

danalysi s o f

laborator y contro l samples ;
• Preparation an

danalysi s o f

matri x spik

e an dmatri x spik

e duplicat e samples ;
• Collectio n an

danalysi s o f

duplicat e samples ; an

d
• Preparation an

danalysi s o f

selectedsample s i n duplicate
. Revie w o f

these QA/Q C activitie s indicate s tha t dat aar e supportable , an

dusable fo r

th e purpos e o f demonstrating regulator

y compliance
. See th

e detaile ddat

aqualit y assessmen

t i n Appendi x H . Th e followin g issue s wer

e identifie ddurin g th

e cours e o f

th e QA/Q C assessment :

• Selectedsample s wer

e analyze di n duplicate
. Ninet y o f 9 6 duplicat

e analyse s me

t th e QAP P specification s (se

e table below)
. The outlier s are :

- As h i n VS2-HBW-13B-COMP2B ; result s o f 58 2 an d64 6 mg/kg ; RP D o f

10.4% ;

- Gros s Calorifi c Valu e i n VS2-LBW-15B-COMP2B ; results o f 17 8 an d15 2 Btu/lb ; RP D o f

15.8% ;

- Chlorin e i n VS3-CS-11A-COM P 1 ; result s o f 25 3 an d32 5 mg/kg ; RP D o f

24.9% ;

- Chlorin e i n VS4-BS-11A-COMP1 ; result s o f 17 1 an d22 1 mg/kg ; RP D o f

25.5% ;

- As h i n VS4-HBW-12B-COMP2B-DUP ; result s o f 943 an d105 0 mg/kg ; RP D o f 10.7% ; an d

- As h VS4-HBW-13A-COMP1 ; results o f 1,50 0 an d92 8 mg/kg ; RP D o f

47.1% . The outlier s fo r

duplicat e analysi s have anegligibl e impact on th e usabilit y o f th e data
. Th e chlorine carrie di n containerize dsolid s andbulk sohd s i s negligibl e (<1% ) compare dt o th e chlorine provide db y th

e spikin g material
. The as h carrie di n high

Btu wast e i s negligibl e (<1% ) comparedt o th e ash provide db y th

e bulk o r 5- 4
VES01778 9

### containerizedsolids
. Th e hea t input result s i n low-Bt

u wast e ar e nea r th e detection limit
. Increase

d uncertaint

y i s expectedclos e t

o th e detection limit
. N o dat

aar e qualifie do

r invalidate dbase

d o n th e result s o f

duplicat e analysis
. • N o duplicat

e analysi s wa

s performe dfo r

moistur e i n soli dwast

e streams . Thi s duplicat e analysi s wa

s specifie di n th

e QAPjP
. Thi s ha

s no impact

o n th e usabilit y o f th e data
. Moistur

e results ar

e use donl y t o characteriz e th

e wast e fee dmaterials , and ar e no t use di n an y demonstratio

n o f compliance
. N o dat

aar e qualifie dor

invalidate d base d o n thi s omission
. 5.3 Stac k

Ga s 5.3. 1 Isokineti c Sampl e Collectio n Isokineti c sampling train s wer e usedfo r

th e collectio n o f

sample s fo r

th e determination of :

• Particulat

e matte r according t

o EP A Metho d5 ;
• Hydroge

n chloride an

dchlorin e accordin g t

o Modifie dEP A Metho d26A ;
• Metal s according t

o EP A Metho d29 ; an

dPolychlorinate ddibenzodioxin s an d polychlorinate ddibenzofuran s accordin g t o SW-84 6 Metho d0023A . Qualit y assuranc

e an dqualit y contro l activitie s associatedwit h th e collectio n o f

these sample s included :

• Collectio n o f

th e specifie dvolume s o f

stac k ga s ove r th e specifie dduration ;
• Collectio n o f

stac k ga s withi n 90-110 % o f

isokinetic ;
• Maintainin g th

e probe , filte r

and(on applicabl e trains ) heate d transfe r lin e a t th e specifie dtemperatures ;
• Maintainin g th

e impinge r exit an d(o n applicabl e trains ) th

e condense

r exi t a t th e specifie dtemperature ;
• Performin g samplin

g train lea k checks befor

e sampl e collection , a

t por t changes , an d afte r sampl e collection ;
• Performin g pitot

tub e lea k check s befor e an dafte r sampl e collection ; an

d

• Recordin g al l dat

ao n pre-printeddat

asheets
. Revie w o f

these QA/Q C activitie s indicate s tha t sampling wa

s performe daccording t

o th e method s an dth e QAPjP
. Se

e th e detaileddat

aqualit y assessmen

t i n Appendi x H . Samphn

g data sheet s ar e presente d i n Appendi x F . Calibratio n documentatio n fo r al l fiel dequipmen

t i s presente d i n Appendix I . N o issue s wer e identifie da

s par t o f th e dat aqualit y assessment.
5- 5
VES01779 0

### 5.3. 2 Analysi s o f Stac k Ga s Sample s fo r Determinatio n o f P M Sample s o f

stac k ga s fo r determination o f

particulat e matte r (PM ) wer

e collecte di n a sampling train meetin

g th e requirement

s EP A Metho d5 . Qualit y assurance an

d qualit y contro l activitie s associate dwit h thi s analysi s included :

• Sample handling an

d preservation ;
• Preparation an

danalysi s o f

sample s withi n specifie dholdin g times ;
• Preparation an

danalysi s o f

laborator y blanks ;
• Collectio n an

d analysi s o f

fiel dblanks ;
• Repeatabilit

y o f sequentia l weighings ; an

d
• Dail y balanc e cahbration
. Revie w o f

these QA/Q C activitie s indicate s tha t these dat aar e supportable , an

duseable
. Se

e th e detaileddat

aqualit y assessmen

t i n Appendi x H . Th

e followin g issue wa

s identifie ddurin g the QA/Q C review :

• Th e fiel dblan

k prob e an dnozzl e rins e ha

dobservable level s nea

r th e detection limit
. Th e level s o f

particulat e materia l observedi n th

e PN Rsample s wer

e ver y low , an d nea r th e detectio n limit
. Level s i n th

e fiel dsample s wer

e simila r t o thes e results , an d ma y hav e apositiv e bias
. A s apositiv e bia s i s conservative relativ e t o th e estimatio n o f emissions , n

o dat aar e qualifie do

r invalidate dbase

d o n fiel dblan

k results
. 5.3. 3 Analysi s o

f Stac k Ga s Sample s fo r Determinatio n o f HCI/CI 2 

### Sample s o f

stac k ga s fo r determination o f

hydroge n chlorid e an

dchlorine (HCI

/CI2 ) wer e collecte di n aModifie dEP A Metho d26 A sampling train
. Sample s recoveredfro mthi s samplin g trai n wer e analyze dfo r

hydroge n chloride andchlorin e usin g io n chromatography , accordin g t o EP A Metho d26A . Qualit y assuranc

e an dqualit y contro l activitie s associate dwit h these analyse s included :

• Sample handling an

dpreservation ;
• Preparation an

danalysi s o f

sample s withi n specifie dholdin g times ;
• Preparation an

d analysi s o f

laborator y blanks ;
• Collectio n an

danalysi s o f

fiel dblanks ;
• Preparation an

d analysi s o f

laborator y contro l samples ;
• Preparation an

d analysi s o f

matri x spik

e an dmatrix spik

e duplicat e samples ; an

d
• Preparation an

danalysi s o f

al l sample s i n duplicate
.

5- 6

### Revie w o f these QA/Q C activitie s indicate s tha t thes e dat aar e supportable , an

duseable
. Se

e the detaile ddat aqualit y assessmen

t i n Appendi x H . Th

e followin g issu e wa

s identifie ddurin g th

e QA/Q C review :

• Hydrogen chloride wa s consistently detecte

d i n th e fiel dblan

k samples
. The level s o f hydroge n chlorid e observe d(approximatel

y 6 0 u, g pe r sample) ar

e wel l belo w th

e level s observe

di n th e fiel dsample s (al l greate r tha n 1,80 0 u, g pe r sample)
. Thes e level s ar e negligibl e an

dhave no impact

o n th e data
. N o dat

aar e qualifie do

r invalidate dbase

do n blan k results
. 5.3.4 Analysi s o

f Stac k Ga s Sample s fo r Determinatio n o f Metal s Sample s fo r

determinatio

n o f metal s i n stac

k ga s wer e collecte daccording t

o EP A Metho d29 . The filters , impinge r solution s an

drinses wer

e analyze dfo r

mercur y b y CVA A accordin g t o SW-84 6 Metho d7470 A an dfo r arsenic , beryllium , cadmium , chromium , an dlea d by ICPES , according t

o SW-84 6 Metho d6010B . Qualit y assurance an

dqualit y contro l activitie s associatedwit h these analyse s included :

• Sampl

e handling an

d preservation ;
• Preparation an

danalysi s o f

sample s withi n specifie dholdin g times ;
• Preparation an

danalysi s o f

laborator y blanks ;
• Collectio n an

d analysi s o f

fiel dblanks ;
• Preparation an

danalysi s o f

medi achec

k samples ;
• Preparation an

d analysi s o f

laborator y contro l sample s (LCS ) an dlaborator

y check sampl e duplicate s (LCSD) ;
• Preparation an

danalysi s o f

matri x spik

e an dmatrix spik

e duplicat e samples ; an

d

• Preparation an

danalysi s o f

pos t digestio n spik

e (PDS ) an

dpos t digestio n spik

e duplicat e (PDSD ) samples
. Review o f

these QA/Q C activitie s indicate s tha t thes e dat aar e supportable , an

duseable
. Se

e the detaileddat

aqualit y assessmen

t i n Appendi x H . Th

e followin g issue s wer

e identifie ddurin g the QA/Q C review :

• Arseni c wa

s foun dabov

e th e detection limi t

i n laborator

y blan k sample s associated wit h analysi s o f

PNR/filte r

samples
. Th

e blan k results fo r

arsenic i n th

e laborator

y blank s ar e nea r th e detection limit , an

dsimila r t o o r belo w th e result s fo r

th e field samples
. Thi s ma

y indicat e aslight positiv e bia s i n th

e fiel dresults
. Sample s wer e no t corrected fo r

fiel dblan k results
. N o results ar

e invalidate do r

qualifie dbase

do n blan k results
. 5- 7

### • Cadmiu man d mercur y wer e eac h foun di n on

e fiel dblan

k sample
. The single positiv e resul

t fo r cadmiumi n on

e fiel dblan

k i s simila r i n magnitud

e to th e fiel d results
. Th

e singl e positiv e resul

t fo r mercur y i n on e fiel dblan

k i s nea r th e detectio n limit , an dwel l belo w man

y o f th e fiel dresults
. Thes e ma

y indicat e asligh t positiv e bia s i n th e fiel dsamples
. Sample s wer e no t correctedfo r

fiel dblan k results
. N o results ar e invalidate dor

qualifie dbase

d on blan k results
. • Chromiumwa

s consistentl

y observedi n fiel dblanks an dmedi achec

k samples
. Th e consisten t observation o f

chromiu mi n fiel dblan

k an dmedi achec

k sample s i s a

t a lowe r leve l tha n th e fiel dsamples
. Thi s ma

y indicat e asligh t positiv e bias i n th

e results fo r th e fiel dsamples
. Sample s wer e no t correctedfo r

fieldblan k results
. N o results ar e invalidate do

r qualifie dbase

d on blan k results
. 5.3. 5 Analysi s o

f Stac k Ga s Sample s fo r Determinatio n o f Dioxins/Furan s Sample s fo r

determinatio

n o f th e polychlorinate ddibenzodioxin s an ddibenzofuran s (dioxins/furans ) wer

e collecte daccordin g t

o th e methodolog

y describedi n SW-84 6 Metho d0023A . Th

e filters , sorben

t traps , an drinse s fro mthese sample s wer e prepare d fo r analysi s according t

o SW-84 6 Metho d0023A , an dth e resultin g extracts analyze dfo r dioxins/furan s b y high-resolution GCMS , according t o SW-84 6 Metho d8290 . Qualit y assuranc

e an dqualit y contro l activitie s associate dwit h these analyse s included :

• Sampl e handhn g an dpreservation ;
• Preparation an

d analysi s o f

sample s withi n specifie dholdin g times ;
• Preparatio

n an d analysi s o f

laborator y blanks ;
• Collectio n an

danalysi s o f

fiel dblanks ;
• Preparatio

n an d analysi s o f

medi achec

k samples ;
• Preparatio

n an danalysi s o f

laborator y contro l sample s an

dlaborator

y chec k sample duplicates ; an

d

• Additio n o f

surrogat e compounds to eac

h sample
. Review o f

these QA/Q C activitie s indicate s tha t thes e dat aar e supportable , an

duseable
. Se

e the detailed dat

aqualit y assessmen

t i n Appendi x H . Th

e followin g issue wa

s identifie ddurin

g th e QA/Q C review o f

thes e data :

• Al l targe

t analyte s excep

t 2,3,7,8-TCD D wer

e observedi n amedi achec k sample , laborator y blan k o r fiel dblank
. Th e level s observe di n th e blan k sample s ar

e ver y low , typicall y nea

r th e detectio n limit
. Typicall y these level s ar e belo w th

e level s observe d i n th e fieldsamples
. Thi s indicate s apotentia l positiv e bia s i n th

e field samples , whic h i s conservative relativ e t o th e determination o f

emissio n rate . N o data ar e qualifie do

r invalidate dbase

d o n blan k results
. 5- 8
VES01779 3

### 5.3. 6 Monitorin g o f Stac k Ga s fo r 0 2 

### , C0 2 

### , an d TH C Th e stac k ga s wa s monitored fo r

oxygen (0 2 

### ) , carbon dioxid e (CO2) , 

### an dtota l hydrocarbon s (THC ) according t o EP A Method s 3 A an

d25A , respectively
. Qualit y assuranc

e an dqualit y contro l activitie s associatedwit h continuou s emissio n monitoring include :

• Us e o f

calibratio n ga

s standards o f

know n an

dacceptabl

e quality ;
• Us e o f

calibratio n ga

s standards i n th

e specifie dranges , • Performanc e o f

syste mbia s checks , • Performanc e o f

calibratio n erro

r tests ; an d
• Performanc e o f

zer o an d spa n drif t checks
. Review of

these QA/Q C activitie s indicate s tha t these dat aar e supportabl

e an dusable
. Se

e th e dat aqualit y assessmen

t i n Appendi x H . Copie s o f certification s o f

calibratio n ga

s standard

s ar e presente d i n Appendi x LRa

w dat afo r continuou s emissio n monitors ar e presente

d i n Appendi x F . Th e followin g issue wa s identifie ddurin g th

e QA/Q C review o f

thi s data :

• Sevent

y o f 7 2 drif t checks fo r

tota l hydrocarbon s me

t methodspecifications
. Th e tw o outlier s wer

e bot h durin g Uni t

2 Ru n IB . A drif

t o f 8.0 % wa s see n a t 1800 , an dadrif t o f 8.3 % wa s observe d a t 1909 . In accordance wit

h EP A Metho d25A , th

e tota l hydrocarbon analyze

r was immediately re-calibrate dfollowin g eac h o f th e drif t excursions
. Th

e dat afro mth e ru n wa s the n recalculate dusin g bot

h calibratio n curve s an dth e highe r (mor e conservative) resul

t reported
. A s th

e averag e TH C wa

s wel l below th e standard , an

dtha t th e conservative recalculatio n approac h specifie di n th

e methodwa

s implemented , an

y uncertaint

y i n these dat

aha s n o impac t on th e conclusio n o f

th e repor t an dth e demonstratio

n o f compliance
. N o dat

aar e flagge dor invalidate dbase

d o n th e calibratio n drif

t results
. 5.4 - Proces s Dat

a I n accordance wit

h th e MAC T requirements , al l proces s instrumentation wa s calibrated
. A Continuous Monitoring System Performance Evaluation Test Plan (CMSPETP ) wa

s prepared an ddefine s th

e calibratio n procedure s an dacceptance criteria
. Th e testing specifie di n th e CMSPET P wa

s performed prior

t o th e CPT . Datafro mth

e CMSPE T i s presente

d i n Appendi x D .

5-9
VES01779 4

### 5.5 Spikin g A s detailed i n Section s 1.

3 an d2. 3 an dAppendi x B , durin g th

e CPT , liquid s an

dsolid s wer e spike dint

o th e incinerator

feed
. QA/Q C activitie s associate d wit h th e spikin g included :

• Us e o f

spikin g material s o f

know n an

dacceptabl

e quahty ;
• Collectio n o f

dat aon dat asheet s an dappropriat

e dat aacquisitio n systems ;
• Calibratio n o f

pumps ; an

d

• Documentation o f

preparation o f

spikin g packets
. Revie w o f these QA/Q C activitie s indicate s tha t th e spikin g dat

aar e supportabl

e an duseable
.

5-1 0
VES01779 5

# VES017798-018278.pd f