1544 Sawdust Road, Suite 302, The Woodlands TX 77380

281.292.0636, fax: 281.298.2550 http://www.denovo-nv.com

2007 INITIAL RELATIVE ACCURACY TEST AUDIT

(RATA) ON THE NITRIC ACID TAIL GAS UNIT CEMS

COFFEYVILLE RESOURCES NITROGEN FERTILIZERS

COFFEYVILLE, KANSAS

Final Report

DNV-5283.02
1544 Sawdust Road, Suite 302, The Woodlands TX 77380

281.292.0636, fax: 281.298.2550 http://www.denovo-nv.com

January 11, 2008

Mr. Doug Robker

Coffeyville Resources Nitrogen Fertilizers

P.O. Box 5000

Coffeyville, Kansas 67337

Re: 2007 CEMS Initial Certification Test for the Nitric Acid Tail Gas Unit, 

 Coffeyville Resources Nitrogen Fertilizers Facility Coffeyville, Kansas

Dear Mr. Robker:

Enclosed are 3 hard copies and 1 copy on CD of the final test report for the 2007 Initial

CEMS Certification Test for the Nitric Acid Tail Gas Unit at the Coffeyville Resources

Nitrogen Fertilizers facility located in Coffeyville, Kansas.

If you have any questions or comments, please do not hesitate to call me at:

(281)292-0636 Ext. 14. Denovo appreciates this opportunity and we look forward to

continuing our successful and lasting relationship.

Sincerely,

Louis M. Esposito

LME/th

Enclosures
SUMMARY

Denovo Global Technologies, Inc. (Denovo) conducted the Initial CEMS Certification

Test on the Nitric Acid Tail Gas Unit (NATGU) EU-1004, Continuous Emissions

Monitoring Systems (CEMS) associated with Coffeyville Resources Nitrogen Fertilizers

(CRNF) plant operations, Coffeyville, Kansas. Testing was conducted for the pollutant

Ox x 2 ides of Nitrogen (NO ) and diluent Oxygen (O ). This test was performed to provide

documentation of compliance with quality assurance provisions contained in Kansas

Department of Health and Environment operating permit.

The testing was conducted on October 11, 2007. The test procedures were performed

in accordance with 40 CFR, Part 60, Appendix F, Section 5.1.1 using performance

specification procedures 2 and 3, located in 40 CFR Part 60, Appendix B. EPA Test

Me 2 x thods 3A and 7E were utilized for certification of O and NO respectively.

Mr. Doug Robker of CRNF was the project coordinator. The team leader for Denovo 

was Mr. Louis Esposito. 

Based on the results of this test, the Nitric Acid Tail Gas Unit passed the Initial

CEMS certification and 7 Day Drift Performance Certification.

Louis M. Esposito

Project Manager

DeNovo-nv, Inc.
i

TABLE OF CONTENTS

SECTION PAGE

SECTION 1.0 INTRODUCTION ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... . Page -1-

SECTION 2.0 TEST METHOD AND EQUIPMENT SUMMARY . . . . . . . . . Page -2-

SECTION 3.0 SUMMARY OF TEST RESULTS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Page -3-

SECTION 3.1 RELATIVE ACCURACY AND 7 DAY DRIFT TEST . . . Page -3-

SECTION 3.2 SAMPLING AND ANALYTICAL PROCEDURES . . . . . Page -3-

3.2.1 RM Instrumentation ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... . . Page -3-

3.2.2 RM Calibration Procedure . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Page -4-

3.2.3 RM Sampling Procedure ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... . Page -4-

3.2.4 RM Data Collection and Reduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Page -4-

3.2.5 7 Day Drift Data Collection and Reduction . . . . . . . . . . . . Page -5-

SECTION 3.3 Unit Mass Emission Determination . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Page -5-

Table 3-1: Nitric Acid Tail Gas Unit CEMS Relative Accuracy Test . . . . . . . . . Page -6-

Table 3-2: Nitric Acid Tail Gas Unit CEMS 7 Day Drift Test . . . . . . . . . . . . . Page -6-

Table 3-3: Nitric Acid Tail Gas Unit Emission Data . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Page -7-

APPENDIX A - CEMS RELATIVE ACCURACY DATA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

APPENDIX B - CEMS 7 DAY DRIFT DATA ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... . .

APPENDIX C - UNIT EMISSION ANALYSIS ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... .

APPENDIX D - GAS CALIBRATION CERTIFICATES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

APPENDIX E - EXAMPLE CALCULATIONS ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... .

APPENDIX F - QUALITY ASSURANCE ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... .
Page -1-

SECTION 1.0 INTRODUCTION

Denovo conducted an Initial Certification Test on the CEMSserving the Nitric Acid Tail Gas

Unit operations at the CRNF facility in Coffeyville, Kansas. The Initial Certification Test

series was conducted while the unit was operating at a >90% load condition. The Initial

Certification test condition consisted of a minimum of (9) twenty-one minute runs and a

7 day performance drift test.

The subsequent sections of this report present results for the tests as follows:

Section 2.0 — Test Method and Equipment Summary

Section 3.0 — Summary of Test Results

The appendices provide documentation and supporting data. The appendices are

organized as follows:

Appendix A — CEM Relative Accuracy Data

Appendix B __ CEMS 7 Day Drift Data

Appendix C __ Unit Emission Analysis

Appendix D __ Gas Calibration Certificates

Appendix E __ Example Calculations

 Appendix F __ Quality Assurance
Page -2-

SECTION 2.0 TEST METHOD AND EQUIPMENT SUMMARY

The test program was designed to provide data for documentation of compliance with

federal regulations associated with New Source Point Standards (NSPS) and state

operating permit requirements related to the initial certification of the CEMS units.

Specif xically, testing for the CRNF facility consisted of sampling on the Ametek NO CEMS

serving the Nitric Acid Tail Gas Unit . O2 sampling was performed to verify system integrity.

The following is a description of the CEMS:

Nitric Acid Tail Gas Unit CEMS

NOx Analyzer - Ametek

I.D No. 8161T

Model: 4000B

Span Range-0-500 ppm NOx

The Plant Data Acquisition System (DAS) is managed by a Honeywell Total Distributive

Control (TDC) processor which compiles data points from the unit CEMS into the

Honeywell Plant History Database (PHD). The PHD system provides one minute average

data.

The Nitric Acid Tail Gas Unit Flue Gas samples are extracted from the source and

transported by heated line to the CEM shelter. The sample is then conditioned and the

CEMS is allowed to draw a dry conditioned sample.
Page -3-

SECTION 3.0 SUMMARY OF TEST RESULTS

A summary of the CEMS Initial Performance Test and 7 Day Drift are given in Table 3-1

SECTION 3.1 RELATIVE ACCURACY AND 7 DAY DRIFT TEST

Relative Accuracy (RA) testing was performed on the Nitric Acid Tail Gas Unit to evaluate

x

the Relative Accuracy of the unit NO analyzer on October 11, 2007. A minimum of nine

test runs were used to calculate the average for the final RA determination for the CEMS

data. This average was then compared with the Reference Method (RM) average

calculations to determine the unit relative accuracy. The RA Performance Specification

x

for NO calculations specifies the CEMS to be within 20% of the RM value, or 10% of the

app 2licable standard. O monitoring was performed to verify system integrity during the test

series. 

The 7 day drift test was performed from November 09, 2007 through November 15, 2007

which consisted of monitoring the daily instrument Zero and Span calibration to determine

overall x instrument stability. The Initial drift performance specification for NO analyzer

requires that the daily low end and high end calibration check be within ± 2.5% of span

each day for seven consecutive days with no external maintenance adjustments. Delay in

performance of the 7 day drift was the result of the Nitric Acid Tail Gas Unit being shut

down from October 19, 2007 through November 01, 2007. 

SECTION 3.2 SAMPLING AND ANALYTICAL PROCEDURES

3.2.1 RM Instrumentation

The compounds cal x 2 ibrated for were Oxides of Nitrogen (NO ) and Oxygen (O ). The

O2 was detected using a California Analytical Instruments Model 600 Paramagnetic

O2 x analyzer. NO analysis was performed utilizing a California Analytical Instruments

Model 600 CLD Chemiluminescence analyzer.
Page -4-

3.2.2 RM Calibration Procedure

All analyzers were calibrated using EPA protocol 1 gas mixtures. Each analyzer

was zeroed with ultra-pure nitrogen, followed by a mid and high range calibration

standard, corresponding to between 40% and 60% for the mid range, and 100% of

the analyzer full span value. For the Nitric Acid Tail Gas Unit the calibration ranges

were as 2 x xfollows: O : 0 - 9.98 %, NO : 0 - 74.3 ppm. N0 converter efficiency is

checked using 46.74 ppm N02.

A system bias check was performed before and after each test run using the midrange gas mixture through the entire sampling system to check for line

contamination and leaks. Calibration correction factors were determined and used

to correct the raw RM concentrations. 

A system leak check was performed before and after the test series.

3.2.3 RM Sampling Procedure

The flue gas samples present in the exhaust stack gas were sampled and

measured according to the requirements and procedures of EPA Reference Method

3A (O2 x ) and 7E (NO ). Samples were drawn from three points across the stack

diameter, 16.7%, 50%, and 83.3% using a multi port probe. From the probe, the

sample was then transferred through a heated line to the mobile laboratory. Upon

entering the lab, the sample passed through a seven micron filter assembly to

remove particulate, a Universal Analyzer Model 9010 to remove moisture, and a

manifold, used to control flow to the analyzers.

3.2.4 RM Data Collection and Reduction

The RM data was collected and averaged on a Measurement Systems DSM Data

Processor with LabTech data acquisition software. The data was collected every

second, with one minute averages printed out. Relative Accuracy testing on each

CEMS consisted of a minimum of (9), twenty-one minute test runs. The relative

accuracy was then averaged and calculated for each system.
Page -5-

3.2.5 7 Day Drift Data Collection and Reduction

The automa xtic daily calibration tests on the NO analyzer was monitored for 7

consecutive days to determine maximum instrument drift. During the test period,

no maintenance or calibration work was performed on the analyzer other than what

which is automatically performed by the instrument.

SECTION 3.3 Unit Mass Emission Determination

Initial testing was performed to demonstrate initial CEMS Relative Accuracy.

Additional post RATA testing was performed to determine mass emissions and

Lb_NOX/ton HNO3. Mass emission analysis was determined for the operating unit

based on collected process and RM NOx and O2 concentrations collected during

the Initial CEMS Relative Accuracy Test Audit (RATA) and from flow measurements

taken using Methods 1,2,and 4 on January 11, 2008. The measured flow data was

then correlated with plant mass balance based flow data and production rates to

determine the relative flow during the October test period. Variation in production

and mass balance flow between the 10/11/07 and 01/11/08 test periods was

determined to be less the 4%. Results are presented in Table 3.3.
Page -6-

Table 3-1: Nitric Acid Tail Gas Unit CEMS Relative Accuracy Test

Run No.

RM

NOx

(ppm)

CEM

NOx

(ppm)

1. 40.01 37.92

2. 42.67 41.74

3. 42.25 41.20

4. 40.77 38.82

5. 49.66 42.83

6. 49.58 43.23

7. 55.59 49.10

8. 57.20 49.42

9. 44.82 42.17

Avg 46.95 42.94

Mean

Difference

4.01

StdDe 2.450

ConC. 2.077

RA% 13.00

Ac/Std % N/A

Abs. Dif. N/A

Status Pass

Table 3-2: Nitric Acid Tail Gas Unit CEMS 7 Day Drift Test

Instrument Maximum Zero

Drift

Maximum Up

Scale Drift

Unit Limit Pass / Fail 

NOx ppm 5.01 9.80 12.50 Pass
Page -7-

Table 3-3: Nitric Acid Tail Gas Unit Emission Data

Instrument Measured or Calculated Permit (7 day average)

X

*NO Emissions (lb/hr) 17.80 N/A

NHO3 Production Rate (ton/hr) 24.98 N/A

Em X 3 ission rate (lb *NO / ton NHO ) 0.712 .8624

Ave Xrage RM *NO (ppm) 46.95 N/A

X 3 *NO / ppm - Ton of HNO factor 0.0152 N/A

*Fo X 2 r calculation purposes, NO assumed to be all NO 
APPENDIX A - CEMS RELATIVE ACCURACY DATA
DeNovo-nv, Inc. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING AND TESTING SERVICES

CLIENT: DATE: 

PLANT LOCATION: PROJECT NO.: 

SOURCE TESTED: LOAD:

Crew Information

Part 60: X J. Brown

Part 75: J Brown

Subpart J: 

Subpart Db: 

Facility Permit: Plant Representative(s)

D. Robker

Plant CEMS Brett 

Wet

Dry X

in, HG Time

Applicable Standards Pretest - Start 14 11:25

Pretest - End 14 11:30

SO2, ppm Leak Rate (In-HG / Min)

SO2, lb/MMBtu in, HG Time

NOx, ppm Post Test - Start 14 18:25

NOx, lb/MMBtu 1 Post Test - End 14 18:30

CO, ppm Leak Rate (In-HG / Min)

Fuel Flow (scfh)

Heat Input (mmbtu/h) Line Temperature OF Line 1 Line 2

Steam Flow (lb/hr) 248.2 N/A

RM Corrections Chiller Temperature OC 3.7

% O2 Correction

% Moisture (bwa). RM Sample

Dry X

Load Basis: HP Mmbtu/hr RM Corrections

X % O2 Correction: 0

NOX O2 CO NOX Converter Efficiency: 98.77%

Component Deviation % :

Stack Stratified : No Non-Stratified Probe Settings(inches):

1 0.0

Stack Information Depth Width 2 0.0

Stack Diameter (inches): N/A 3 0.0

Sample Point Height (feet):

Nozzle 

Extension

NH3 Plant

10/11/2007

5283.020

0.00

0.00

RM System Leak Check

1544 Sawdust Road, Suite 302

The Woodlands, TX 77380

 40 Code of Federal Regulations:

TESTING INFORMATION

>50%

CRNF

Coffeyville, Ks
DeNovo-nv, Inc. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING AND TESTING SERVICES

The Woodlands, TX 77380

CLIENT: CRNF DATE: 10/11/2007

PLANT LOCATION: Coffeyville, Ks PROJECT NO.: 5283

SOURCE TESTED: NH3 Plant

Plant CEMS: RM Protocol Gases

Fuel Factor Dry (Fd) 8710 Cylinder RM

Fuel Factor Wet (Fd) Cylinder No. Concentration SPAN

Carbon Monoxide Monitor CO

Manufacturer: SG9905181A Zero 0.00

Serial Number: Low

Model No. Mid

Range: High

Carbon Dioxide Monitor CO2

Manufacturer: California Analytical SG9905181A Zero 0.00

Serial Number: 12237 Mid

Model No. 200 - Paramagnetic High

Range:

Oxygen Monitor O2

Manufacturer: California Analytical SG9905181A Zero 0.00 9.98

Serial Number: 12237 CC118059 Mid 5.01

Model No. 200 - Paramagnetic CC141137 High 9.98

Range: 9.98

NOx Monitor NOx

Manufacturer: Ametek California Analytical SG9905181A Zero 0.00 74.30

Serial Number: 6161T T-02015 CC82688 Mid 35.10

Model No. 4000B 600 CLD CC204451 High 74.30

Range: 500 ppm 74.30

Sulphur Dioxide Monitor SO2

Manufacturer: SG9905181A Zero 0.00

Serial Number: Mid

Model No. High

Range:

RM 

INSTRUMENTATION

CEMS 

INSTRUMENTATION

1544 Sawdust Road, Suite 302
ENVIRONMENT

The Woodlands, TX 77380

RUN NOx CO SO2 O2 

NUMBER TIME C Cma Cm Co C Cma Cm Co C Cma Cm Co C Cma Cm Co 

1 13:00 40.00 35.1 35.10 0.04 3.33 5.01 5.06 0.09 2 13:30 42.69 35.1 35.12 0.04 3.35 5.01 5.04 0.11 3 13:59 42.12 35.1 35.00 0.04 3.40 5.01 5.04 0.13 4 14:28 40.62 35.1 34.98 0.04 3.41 5.01 5.04 0.14 5 15:27 49.82 35.1 35.23 0.04 3.31 5.01 4.99 0.07 6 16:26 49.82 35.1 35.28 0.04 3.34 5.01 4.95 -0.03 7 16:55 55.85 35.1 35.28 0.04 3.33 5.01 4.98 -0.05 8 17:26 57.18 35.1 35.21 0.31 3.33 5.01 5.00 -0.05 9 17:56 44.36 35.1 34.84 0.47 3.33 5.01 4.97 -0.05 

101112

RUN RM Bias Corrected Data NOX SO2 CEM Corr

NUMBER TIME NOX CO SO2 O2 Lb/mmBTU Lb/mmBTU NOx CO SO2 O2 NOx CO 

1 13:00 N/A 40.01 3.27 0.0493 37.92 N/A 37.92 

2 13:30 N/A 42.67 3.30 0.0527 41.74 N/A 41.74 

3 13:59 N/A 42.25 3.34 0.0523 41.20 N/A 41.20 

4 14:28 N/A 40.77 3.35 0.0505 38.82 N/A 38.82 

5 15:27 N/A 49.66 3.30 0.0613 42.83 N/A 42.83 

6 16:26 N/A 49.58 3.39 0.0615 43.23 N/A 43.23 

7 16:55 N/A 55.59 3.37 0.0689 49.10 N/A 49.10 

8 17:26 N/A 57.20 3.36 0.0709 49.42 N/A 49.42 

9 17:56 N/A 44.82 3.38 0.0556 42.17 42.17 

CRNFCoffeyville, Ks>50%

DeNovo-nv, Inc.

9

CLIENT: 

1544 Sawdust Road, Suite 302NO. OF RUNS COMPLETED:LOAD: LOCATION: 

O2 Correction

RM SUMMARY CEM SUMMARY

RM CALIBRATION CORRECTION DATA

O2 Correction

CEM Data - Uncorrected Moisture 

Percent
 ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING AND TESTING SERVICES

CLIENT: DATE: 

LOCATION: 

LOAD:

ANALYZER:

UNIT:

RUN

NUMBER TIME RM CEMS Diff

1 13:00 40.01 37.92 2.09

2 13:30 42.67 41.74 0.93

3 13:59 42.25 41.20 1.05

4 14:28 40.77 38.82 1.95

5 15:27 49.66 42.83 6.83

6 16:26 49.58 43.23 6.35

7 16:55 55.59 49.10 6.49

8 17:26 57.20 49.42 7.78

9 17:56 44.82 42.17 2.65

Average 46.95 42.94 4.01

NOx

RM AVERAGE: 46.9500 ppmv

CEMS AVERAGE: 42.9367 ppmv

ARITHMETIC MEAN: 4.0133

STANDARD DEVIATION: 2.7798

CONFIDENCE COEFFICIENT: 2.077

ACCURACY VS. RM AVERAGE: 13.0 %

ACCURACY VS. APPLICABLE STANDARD: N/A %

Relative Accuracy for Nox

X , FAILS 

DeNovo-nv

The Woodlands, TX 77380

1544 Sawdust Road, Suite 302

RELATIVE ACCURACY TESTING SUMMARY - NOx ANALYZER

PPMV

THE ABOVE DATA CERTIFIES THAT THE C.E.M. FOR WHICH THIS DATA IS 

PROVIDED PASSES THE RELATIVE ACCURACY TEST

The table below contains the results of testing and calcultions performed on the date(s) listed. 

The testing was performed in accordance with 40 CFR Part 60, Appendix A, Method 7E and Appendix B, 

Performance Specification 2.

'*Shall not exceed 20.0 percent of the mean value of the reference method test data or 10 percent of the Relative Standard, whichever is greater.

APPLICABLE STANDARD: 

ANALYZER ID: 

PERSONNEL: 

PROJECT NO.: 

NH3 Plant

10/11/2007

5283.020

J. Brown

0

N/A

CRNF

Coffeyville, Ks

>50%

Ametek
Plant Name CRNF Plant Rep. D. Robker

Unit NH3 Plant Crew Chief J. Brown

Project Number 5283.02 CEMS Operator J Brown

Run Number 1 Date 10/11/07

Calibration

Initial Final System Correction

Cylinder Calibration Difference Calibration System Bias System Drift Factor

Value Response (% of Span) Response Response (% of Span) Response (% of Span) Co/Cm

CO Zero

CO Low

CO Mid

CO High

CO2 Zero

CO2 Mid

CO2 High

O2 Zero 0.00 0.02 -0.20 0.07 0.50 0.11 0.40 0.09

O2 Mid 5.01 5.01 0.00 5.04 -0.30 5.07 -0.30 5.06

O2 High 9.98 9.98 0.00

NOx Zero 0.00 0.06 -0.08 0.03 0.04 0.04 -0.01 0.04

NOx Mid 35.10 35.04 0.08 35.12 -0.11 35.07 0.07 35.10

NOx High 74.30 74.37 -0.09

SO2 Zero

SO2 Mid

SO2 High

Calibration System Zero Calibration

Span Values Error <2% Bias <5% Drift <3% Drift <3%

CO

CO2

O2 9.98 Pass Pass Pass Pass

NOx 74.30 Pass Pass Pass Pass

SO2

Plant Name CRNF Plant Rep. D. Robker

Location NH3 Plant Crew Chief J. Brown

Project Number 5283.02 CEMS Operator J Brown

Run Number 2 Date 10/11/07

SYSTEM BIAS CHECK

CALIBRATION ERROR PRETEST POST TEST Calibration

Analyzer System Correction

Cylinder Calibration Difference System Bias System Drift Factor

Value Response (% of Span) Response (% of Span) Response (% of Span) Co/Cm

CO Zero

CO Low

CO Mid

CO High

CO2 Zero

CO2 Mid

CO2 High

O2 Zero 0.00 0.02 -0.20 0.11 -0.90 0.11 0.00 0.11

O2 Mid 5.01 5.01 0.00 5.07 -0.60 5 0.70 5.04

O2 High 9.98 9.98 0.00

NOx Zero 0.00 0.06 -0.08 0.04 0.03 0.04 0.00 0.04

NOx Mid 35.10 35.04 0.08 35.07 -0.04 35.17 -0.13 35.12

NOx High 74.30 74.37 -0.09

SO2 Zero 0.00 #VALUE!

SO2 Mid 0.00 #VALUE!

SO2 High

Calibration System Zero Calibration

Span Values Error <2% Bias <5% Drift <3% Drift <3%

CO

CO2

O2 9.98 Pass Pass Pass Pass

NOx 74.3 Pass Pass Pass Pass

SO2

RM RUN CALIBRATION DATA

RM RUN CALIBRATION DATA

SYSTEM BIAS CHECK

CALIBRATION ERROR PRETEST POST TEST
Plant Name CRNF Plant Rep. D. Robker

Location NH3 Plant Crew Chief J. Brown

Project Number 5283.02 CEMS Operator J Brown

Run Number 3 Date 10/11/07

SYSTEM BIAS CHECK

CALIBRATION ERROR PRETEST POST TEST Calibration

Analyzer System Correction

Cylinder Calibration Difference System Bias System Drift Factor

Value Response (% of Span) Response (% of Span) Response (% of Span) Co/Cm

CO Zero

CO Low

CO Mid

CO High

CO2 Zero

CO2 Mid

CO2 High

O2 Zero 0.00 0.02 -0.20 0.11 -0.90 0.14 -0.30 0.13

O2 Mid 5.01 5.01 0.00 5.00 0.10 5.08 -0.80 5.04

O2 High 9.98 9.98 0.00

NOx Zero 0.00 0.06 -0.08 0.04 0.03 0.04 0.00 0.04

NOx Mid 35.10 35.04 0.08 35.17 -0.17 34.83 0.46 35.00

NOx High 74.30 74.37 -0.09

SO2 Zero 0.00 #VALUE!

SO2 Mid 0.00 #VALUE!

SO2 High

Calibration System Zero Calibration

Span Values Error <2% Bias <5% Drift <3% Drift <3%

CO

CO2

O2 9.98 Pass Pass Pass Pass

NOx 74.3 Pass Pass Pass Pass

SO2

Plant Name CRNF Plant Rep. D. Robker

Location NH3 Plant Crew Chief J. Brown

Project Number 5283.02 CEMS Operator J Brown

Run Number 4 Date 10/11/07

SYSTEM BIAS CHECK

CALIBRATION ERROR PRETEST POST TEST Calibration

Analyzer System Correction

Cylinder Calibration Difference System Bias System Drift Factor

Value Response (% of Span) Response (% of Span) Response (% of Span) Co/Cm

CO Zero

CO Low

CO Mid

CO High

CO2 Zero

CO2 Mid

CO2 High

O2 Zero 0.00 0.02 -0.20 0.14 -1.20 0.13 0.10 0.14

O2 Mid 5.01 5.01 0.00 5.08 -0.70 5 0.80 5.04

O2 High 9.98 9.98 0.00

NOx Zero 0.00 0.06 -0.08 0.04 0.03 0.04 0.00 0.04

NoxMid 35.10 35.04 0.08 34.83 0.28 35.13 -0.40 34.98

NOx High 74.30 74.37 -0.09

SO2 Zero

SO2 Mid

SO2 High

Calibration System Zero Calibration

Span Values Error <2% Bias <5% Drift <3% Drift <3%

CO

CO2

O2 9.98 Pass Pass Pass Pass

NOx 74.3 Pass Pass Pass Pass

SO2

RM RUN CALIBRATION DATA

RM RUN CALIBRATION DATA
Plant Name CRNF Plant Rep. D. Robker

Location NH3 Plant Crew Chief J. Brown

Project Number 5283.02 CEMS Operator J Brown

Run Number 5 Date 10/11/07

SYSTEM BIAS CHECK

CALIBRATION ERROR PRETEST POST TEST Calibration

Analyzer System Correction

Cylinder Calibration Difference System Bias System Drift Factor

Value Response (% of Span) Response (% of Span) Response (% of Span) Co/Cm

CO Zero

CO Low

CO Mid

CO High

CO2 Zero

CO2 Mid

CO2 High

O2 Zero 0.00 0.02 -0.20 0.13 -1.10 0 1.30 0.07

O2 Mid 5.01 5.01 0.00 5.00 0.10 4.97 0.30 4.99

O2 High 9.98 9.98 0.00

NOx Zero 0.00 0.06 -0.08 0.04 0.03 0.04 0.00 0.04

NOx Mid 35.10 35.04 0.08 35.13 -0.12 35.32 -0.26 35.23

NOx High 74.30 74.37 -0.09

SO2 Zero

SO2 Mid

SO2 High

Calibration System Zero Calibration

Span Values Error <2% Bias <5% Drift <3% Drift <3%

CO

CO2

O2 9.98 Pass Pass Pass Pass

NOx 74.3 Pass Pass Pass Pass

SO2

Plant Name CRNF Plant Rep. D. Robker

Location NH3 Plant Crew Chief J. Brown

Project Number 5283.02 CEMS Operator J Brown

Run Number 6 Date 10/11/07

SYSTEM BIAS CHECK

CALIBRATION ERROR PRETEST POST TEST Calibration

Analyzer System Correction

Cylinder Calibration Difference System Bias System Drift Factor

Value Response (% of Span) Response (% of Span) Response (% of Span) Co/Cm

CO Zero

CO Low

CO Mid

CO High

CO2 Zero

CO2 Mid

CO2 High

O2 Zero 0.00 0.02 -0.20 0.00 0.20 -0.05 0.50 -0.03

O2 Mid 5.01 5.01 0.00 4.97 0.40 4.92 0.50 4.95

O2 High 9.98 9.98 0.00

NOx Zero 0.00 0.06 -0.08 0.04 0.03 0.03 0.01 0.04

NOx Mid 35.10 35.04 0.08 35.32 -0.38 35.24 0.11 35.28

NOx High 74.30 74.37 -0.09

SO2 Zero

SO2 Mid

SO2 High

Calibration System Zero Calibration

Span Values Error <2% Bias <5% Drift <3% Drift <3%

CO

CO2

O2 9.98 Pass Pass Pass Pass

NOx 74.3 Pass Pass Pass Pass

SO2

RM RUN CALIBRATION DATA

RM RUN CALIBRATION DATA
Plant Name CRNF Plant Rep. D. Robker

Location NH3 Plant Crew Chief J. Brown

Project Number 5283.02 CEMS Operator J Brown

Run Number 7 Date 10/11/07

SYSTEM BIAS CHECK

CALIBRATION ERROR PRETEST POST TEST Calibration

Analyzer System Correction

Cylinder Calibration Difference System Bias System Drift Factor

Value Response (% of Span) Response (% of Span) Response (% of Span) Co/Cm

CO Zero

CO Low

CO Mid

CO High

CO2 Zero

CO2 Mid

CO2 High

O2 Zero 0.00 0.02 -0.20 -0.05 0.70 -0.05 0.00 -0.05

O2 Mid 5.01 5.01 0.00 4.92 0.90 5.03 -1.10 4.98

O2 High 9.98 9.98 0.00

NOx Zero 0.00 0.06 -0.08 0.03 0.04 0.04 -0.01 0.04

NOx Mid 35.10 35.04 0.08 35.24 -0.27 35.31 -0.09 35.28

NOx High 74.30 74.37 -0.09

SO2 Zero

SO2 Mid

SO2 High

Calibration System Zero Calibration

Span Values Error <2% Bias <5% Drift <3% Drift <3%

CO

CO2

O2 9.98 Pass Pass Pass Pass

NOx 74.3 Pass Pass Pass Pass

SO2

Plant Name CRNF Plant Rep. D. Robker

Location NH3 Plant Crew Chief J. Brown

Project Number 5283.02 CEMS Operator J Brown

Run Number 8 Date 10/11/07

SYSTEM BIAS CHECK

CALIBRATION ERROR PRETEST POST TEST Calibration

Analyzer System Correction

Cylinder Calibration Difference System Bias System Drift Factor

Value Response (% of Span) Response (% of Span) Response (% of Span) Co/Cm

CO Zero

CO Low

CO Mid

CO High

CO2 Zero

CO2 Mid

CO2 High

O2 Zero 0.00 0.02 -0.20 -0.05 0.70 -0.05 0.00 -0.05

O2 Mid 5.01 5.01 0.00 5.03 -0.20 4.96 0.70 5.00

O2 High 9.98 9.98 0.00

NOx Zero 0.00 0.06 -0.08 0.04 0.03 0.57 -0.71 0.31

NOx Mid 35.10 35.04 0.08 35.31 -0.36 35.10 0.28 35.21

NOx High 74.30 74.37 -0.09

SO2 Zero

SO2 Mid

SO2 High

Calibration System Zero Calibration

Span Values Error <2% Bias <5% Drift <3% Drift <3%

CO

CO2

O2 9.98 Pass Pass Pass Pass

NOx 74.3 Pass Pass Pass Pass

SO2

RM RUN CALIBRATION DATA

RM RUN CALIBRATION DATA
Plant Name CRNF Plant Rep. D. Robker

Location NH3 Plant Crew Chief J. Brown

Project Number 5283.02 CEMS Operator J Brown

Run Number 9 Date 10/11/07

Final Run Yes: x

SYSTEM BIAS CHECK

CALIBRATION ERROR PRETEST POST TEST Calibration

Analyzer System Correction

Cylinder Calibration Difference System Bias System Drift Factor

Value Response (% of Span) Response (% of Span) Response (% of Span) Co/Cm

CO Zero

CO Low

CO Mid

CO High

CO2 Zero

CO2 Mid

CO2 High

O2 Zero 0.00 0.02 -0.20 -0.05 0.70 -0.05 0.00 -0.05

O2 Mid 5.01 5.01 0.00 4.96 0.50 4.97 -0.10 4.97

O2 High 9.98 9.98 0.00

NOx Zero 0.00 0.06 -0.08 0.57 -0.69 0.36 0.28 0.47

NOx Mid 35.10 35.04 0.08 35.10 -0.08 34.58 0.70 34.84

NOx High 74.30 74.37 -0.09

SO2 Zero

SO2 Mid

SO2 High

Calibration System Zero Calibration

Span Values Error <2% Bias <5% Drift <3% Drift <3%

CO

CO2

O2 9.98 Pass Pass Pass Pass

NOx 74.3 Pass Pass Pass Pass

SO2

RM RUN CALIBRATION DATA
DeNovo-nv, Inc.

CRNF - NOx CEMS RATA 

Date is 10-11-2007.

Time O2 NOx

HH:MM:SS % PPM

11:47:36 9.98 0.00

11:48:36 9.98 0.18 O2 High

11:49:36 7.18 0.26

11:50:36 5.04 0.06 N0x Zero

11:51:36 5.01 -0.02 O2 Mid

11:52:36 0.85 55.32

11:53:36 0.02 74.37 N0x High

11:54:36 0.02 59.46

11:55:36 0.02 34.92 O2 Zero

11:56:36 0.02 35.04 N0x Mid

11:57:36 0.33 35.68

11:58:36 0.44 41.33

11:59:36 0.44 44.53

12:00:36 1.49 28.76

12:01:36 0.13 0.90

12:02:36 0.07 0.22 O2 Zero

12:03:36 4.27 0.03 N0x Zero

12:04:36 5.04 0.04 O2 Mid

12:05:36 1.26 24.11

12:06:36 0.10 35.12 N0x Mid

 Plant Value

12:30:02 3.31 34.31 O2 NOx NOx NOx

12:31:02 3.33 34.19 % PPM PPM PPM

12:32:02 3.37 33.14 3.35 36.53 25.09 12:32:00 25.91

12:33:02 3.35 32.35 12:33:00 25.91

12:34:02 3.36 31.97 12:34:00 25.95

12:35:02 3.38 31.40 12:35:00 25.96

12:36:02 3.37 33.33 12:36:00 26.54

12:37:02 3.37 37.00 12:37:00 27.68

12:38:02 3.37 36.94 12:38:00 28.02

12:39:02 3.32 33.34 12:39:00 28.01

12:40:02 3.27 31.98 12:40:00 28.02

12:41:02 3.32 33.24 12:41:00 27.97

12:42:02 3.40 38.73 12:42:00 27.97

12:43:02 3.34 38.57 12:43:00 27.97

12:44:02 3.28 31.56 12:44:00 28.01

12:45:02 3.20 26.96 12:45:00 24.32

12:46:02 3.31 25.93 12:46:00 20.13

12:47:02 3.53 29.25 12:47:00 21.40

12:48:02 3.54 38.05 12:48:00 21.41

12:49:02 3.46 47.03 12:49:00 21.41

12:50:02 3.36 52.19 12:50:00 21.41

12:51:02 3.23 53.91 12:51:00 21.41

12:52:02 3.18 50.29 12:52:00 21.41

12:53:02 3.18 45.99

12:54:02 2.84 44.17

12:55:02 0.05 35.18

12:56:02 0.05 35.12 O2 Zero N0x Mid

12:57:02 4.67 5.80

12:58:02 5.00 0.04 O2 Mid N0x Zero

 Plant Value

12:58:47 5.01 0.04 O2 NOx NOx NOx

12:59:47 4.23 14.48 % PPM PPM PPM

13:00:47 3.27 39.06 3.33 40.00 37.92 13:00:00 42.13

13:01:47 3.33 37.59 13:01:00 42.13

13:02:47 3.33 39.25 13:02:00 42.13

13:03:47 3.34 38.60 13:03:00 42.13

13:04:47 3.33 34.11 13:04:00 38.43

13:05:47 3.29 31.42 13:05:00 33.35

13:06:47 3.33 33.99 13:06:00 33.32

13:07:47 3.45 38.46 13:07:00 33.35

13:08:47 3.45 40.11 13:08:00 33.41

13:09:47 3.34 40.57 13:09:00 33.41

13:10:47 3.30 40.89 13:10:00 33.37

13:11:47 3.36 41.67 13:11:00 33.36

13:12:47 3.36 42.70 13:12:00 33.37

13:13:47 3.31 42.62 13:13:00 36.47

13:14:47 3.33 42.74 13:14:00 40.79

13:15:47 3.35 44.96 13:15:00 40.86

13:16:47 3.30 45.85 13:16:00 40.91

13:17:47 3.29 43.49 13:17:00 40.87

13:18:47 3.29 41.30 13:18:00 40.86

13:19:47 3.32 40.07 13:19:00 40.87

13:20:47 3.31 40.46 13:20:00 40.82

CEM Data

Run 1

CEM Data

Run 2

Post-Test Bias

Run 2

Post-Test Bias

Pre-Test Calibration

Pre-Test Bias

Run 1

N0x Converter Check
13:21:47 3.36 41.20 13:21:00 40.82

13:22:47 3.46 41.99

13:23:47 5.07 3.59 O2 Mid

13:24:47 5.01 0.04 N0x Zero

13:25:47 0.54 28.29

13:26:47 0.11 34.97 O2 Zero

13:27:47 0.11 35.07 N0x Mid

 Plant Value

13:28:34 0.10 35.15 O2 NOx NOx NOx

13:29:34 1.66 38.84 % PPM PPM PPM

13:30:34 3.33 46.98 3.35 42.69 41.74 13:30:00 37.63

13:31:34 3.34 44.28 13:31:00 40.03

13:32:34 3.37 41.82 13:32:00 43.33

13:33:34 3.35 41.43 13:33:00 43.35

13:34:34 3.41 44.18 13:34:00 43.39

13:35:34 3.45 49.30 13:35:00 43.40

13:36:34 3.37 55.25 13:36:00 43.39

13:37:34 3.30 53.86 13:37:00 43.40

13:38:34 3.26 48.17 13:38:00 43.35

13:39:34 3.20 44.80 13:39:00 43.43

13:40:34 3.26 39.72 13:40:00 42.63

13:41:34 3.33 38.35 13:41:00 41.43

13:42:34 3.34 39.25 13:42:00 41.43

13:43:34 3.42 37.96 13:43:00 41.34

13:44:34 3.45 38.72 13:44:00 41.33

13:45:34 3.41 42.44 13:45:00 41.38

13:46:34 3.40 43.16 13:46:00 41.34

13:47:34 3.36 40.27 13:47:00 41.29

13:48:34 3.30 37.98 13:48:00 41.33

13:49:34 3.37 35.45 13:49:00 40.04

13:50:34 3.42 33.16 13:50:00 38.20

13:51:34 3.40 34.15

13:52:34 3.42 35.60

13:53:34 0.44 35.12

13:54:34 0.11 35.17 O2 Zero N0x Mid

13:55:34 4.16 9.57

13:56:34 5.00 0.04 O2 Mid N0x Zero

 Plant Value

13:57:03 5.01 0.04 O2 NOx NOx NOx

13:58:03 4.24 13.63 % PPM PPM PPM

13:59:03 3.28 37.35 3.40 41.79 41.20 13:59:00 37.16

14:00:03 3.35 34.25 14:00:00 37.20

14:01:03 3.41 33.73 14:01:00 37.25

14:02:03 3.47 34.92 14:02:00 37.25

14:03:03 3.48 39.22 14:03:00 37.21

14:04:03 3.45 44.20 14:04:00 37.16

14:05:03 3.46 45.73 14:05:00 37.16

14:06:03 3.40 46.82 14:06:00 37.16

14:07:03 3.32 44.55 14:07:00 40.08

14:08:03 3.31 40.40 14:08:00 44.08

14:09:03 3.35 38.60 14:09:00 44.10

14:10:03 3.39 38.93 14:10:00 44.10

14:11:03 3.45 40.01 14:11:00 43.54

14:12:03 3.45 40.48 14:12:00 43.54

14:13:03 3.42 40.84 14:13:00 43.54

14:14:03 3.42 44.31 14:14:00 43.58

14:15:03 3.46 44.92 14:15:00 43.59

14:16:03 3.41 48.71 14:16:00 43.54

14:17:03 3.36 47.12 14:17:00 44.13

14:18:03 3.43 45.89 14:18:00 44.94

14:19:03 3.38 46.66 14:19:00 44.94

14:20:03 3.44 45.46

14:21:03 3.52 46.08

14:22:03 5.08 4.27 O2 Mid

14:23:03 5.01 0.04 N0x Zero

14:24:03 1.11 24.42

14:25:03 0.14 34.83 O2 Zero N0x Mid

 Plant Value

14:26:11 0.14 34.97 O2 NOx NOx NOx

14:27:11 1.67 34.88 % PPM PPM PPM

14:28:11 3.40 36.73 3.41 42.12 38.82 14:28:00 28.53

14:29:11 3.46 40.41 14:29:00 28.53

14:30:11 3.50 41.02 14:30:00 28.57

14:31:11 3.43 42.35 14:31:00 28.59

14:32:11 3.36 41.79 14:32:00 28.53

14:33:11 3.39 42.15 14:33:00 28.49

14:34:11 3.44 46.35 14:34:00 36.52

14:35:11 3.43 48.49 14:35:00 47.87

14:36:11 3.36 46.10 14:36:00 48.32

Run 4

CEM Data

Run 5

CEM Data

Run 3

CEM Data

Post-Test Bias

Run 4

Post-Test Bias

Run 5

Run 3
14:37:11 3.30 42.40 14:37:00 48.36

14:38:11 3.32 39.45 14:38:00 48.37

14:39:11 3.40 38.39 14:39:00 48.32

14:40:11 3.44 41.14 14:40:00 48.36

14:41:11 3.46 43.14 14:41:00 48.37

14:42:11 3.45 42.37 14:42:00 48.32

14:43:11 3.39 40.53 14:43:00 41.50

14:44:11 3.37 39.87 14:44:00 33.97

14:45:11 3.43 41.29 14:45:00 36.43

14:46:11 3.46 44.19 14:46:00 36.46

14:47:11 3.43 44.05 14:47:00 36.41

14:48:11 3.39 42.39 14:48:00 36.41

14:49:11 3.36 42.60

14:50:11 3.37 41.97

14:51:11 0.48 35.78

14:52:11 0.13 35.13 O2 Zero N0x Mid

14:53:11 3.42 14.76

14:54:11 5.00 0.04 O2 Mid N0x Zero

 Plant Value

14:55:19 5.01 0.04 O2 NOx NOx NOx

14:56:19 4.36 12.99 % PPM PPM PPM

14:57:19 3.46 43.84 3.43 42.52 33.37 14:57:00 27.26

14:58:19 3.46 45.99 14:58:00 27.31

14:59:19 3.43 45.59 14:59:00 27.27

15:00:19 3.36 40.65 15:00:00 27.22

15:01:19 3.34 36.35 15:01:00 29.47

15:02:19 3.37 36.79 15:02:00 32.90

15:03:19 3.44 39.04 15:03:00 33.37

15:04:19 3.49 39.51 15:04:00 33.32

15:05:19 3.44 42.04 15:05:00 33.32

15:06:19 3.45 42.70 15:06:00 33.32

15:07:19 3.49 42.57 15:07:00 33.32

15:08:19 3.41 41.98 15:08:00 33.35

15:09:19 3.36 41.52 15:09:00 33.37

15:10:19 3.46 39.61 15:10:00 33.83

15:11:19 3.46 39.80 15:11:00 35.87

15:12:19 3.42 44.02 15:12:00 37.71

15:13:19 3.47 51.19 15:13:00 37.68

15:14:19 3.52 49.59 15:14:00 37.67

15:15:19 3.40 47.25 15:15:00 37.72

15:16:19 3.32 43.44 15:16:00 37.72

15:17:19 3.49 39.50 15:17:00 37.72

15:18:19 3.50 42.88

15:19:19 3.51 48.58

15:20:19 5.08 4.53 O2 Mid

15:21:19 5.01 0.04 N0x Zero

15:22:19 2.05 17.73

15:23:19 0.08 34.90

15:24:19 0.01 35.00 O2 Zero N0x Mid

 Plant Value

15:25:35 0.00 35.04 O2 NOx NOx NOx

15:26:35 1.54 37.00 % PPM PPM PPM

15:27:35 3.34 40.15 3.31 40.62 42.83 15:27:00 44.85

15:28:35 3.28 40.67 15:28:00 44.89

15:29:35 3.31 40.81 15:29:00 42.93

15:30:35 3.31 40.20 15:30:00 40.18

15:31:35 3.28 39.58 15:31:00 40.20

15:32:35 3.27 38.24 15:32:00 40.22

15:33:35 3.32 36.59 15:33:00 40.16

15:34:35 3.34 35.94 15:34:00 40.20

15:35:35 3.34 35.75 15:35:00 40.25

15:36:35 3.35 36.12 15:36:00 40.22

15:37:35 3.37 40.56 15:37:00 40.24

15:38:35 3.36 44.94 15:38:00 42.20

15:39:35 3.33 40.19 15:39:00 44.78

15:40:35 3.20 35.41 15:40:00 44.81

15:41:35 3.19 36.07 15:41:00 44.80

15:42:35 3.42 39.71 15:42:00 44.81

15:43:35 3.47 45.64 15:43:00 44.76

15:44:35 3.30 46.44 15:44:00 44.76

15:45:35 3.26 46.20 15:45:00 44.76

15:46:35 3.25 46.53 15:46:00 44.76

15:47:35 3.27 47.32 15:47:00 44.76

15:48:35 3.22 44.90

15:49:35 3.22 41.99

15:50:35 0.36 35.78

15:51:35 0.00 35.32 O2 Zero N0x Mid

15:52:35 3.80 11.25

15:53:35 4.96 0.04

Run 7

Run 6

CEM Data

CEM Data

Post-Test Bias

Post-Test Bias

Run 6

Post-Test Bias

Run 7
15:54:35 4.97 0.04 O2 Mid N0x Zero

 Plant Value

15:55:31 4.97 0.04 O2 NOx NOx NOx

15:56:31 4.30 13.08 % PPM PPM PPM

15:57:31 3.44 43.71 3.31 48.77 35.33 15:57:00 29.62

15:58:31 3.42 47.99 15:58:00 29.56

15:59:31 3.35 57.01 15:59:00 29.56

16:00:31 3.33 52.49 16:00:00 29.60

16:01:31 3.29 40.88 16:01:00 29.66

16:02:31 3.12 38.35 16:02:00 29.62

16:03:31 3.33 37.76 16:03:00 29.56

16:04:31 3.54 41.95 16:04:00 29.56

16:05:31 3.46 47.90 16:05:00 34.06

16:06:31 3.40 54.64 16:06:00 40.26

16:07:31 3.36 58.63 16:07:00 40.31

16:08:31 3.29 58.77 16:08:00 40.26

16:09:31 3.18 63.19 16:09:00 40.22

16:10:31 3.19 59.78 16:10:00 40.24

16:11:31 3.24 53.14 16:11:00 40.31

16:12:31 3.14 49.02 16:12:00 40.26

16:13:31 3.19 45.05 16:13:00 40.29

16:14:31 3.32 42.20 16:14:00 38.81

16:15:31 3.29 41.46 16:15:00 36.74

16:16:31 3.31 43.61 16:16:00 36.75

16:17:31 3.42 46.72 16:17:00 36.69

16:18:31 3.42 51.41

16:19:31 3.38 48.67

16:20:31 5.02 4.39 O2 Mid

16:21:31 4.94 0.04 N0x Zero

16:22:31 2.35 15.10

16:23:31 -0.04 35.64 O2 Zero N0x Mid

 Plant Value

16:24:24 -0.06 35.77 O2 NOx NOx NOx

16:25:24 1.39 40.13 % PPM PPM PPM

16:26:24 3.29 49.53 3.34 49.82 43.23 16:26:00 46.16

16:27:24 3.33 49.83 16:27:00 46.16

16:28:24 3.36 50.15 16:28:00 46.16

16:29:24 3.36 48.22 16:29:00 46.12

16:30:24 3.30 46.09 16:30:00 46.11

16:31:24 3.30 46.12 16:31:00 46.16

16:32:24 3.35 46.57 16:32:00 43.88

16:33:24 3.35 48.21 16:33:00 40.86

16:34:24 3.33 49.92 16:34:00 41.00

16:35:24 3.36 49.66 16:35:00 40.97

16:36:24 3.35 48.99 16:36:00 40.91

16:37:24 3.31 48.86 16:37:00 40.91

16:38:24 3.33 46.67 16:38:00 40.95

16:39:24 3.33 46.23 16:39:00 40.97

16:40:24 3.34 47.24 16:40:00 40.91

16:41:24 3.38 49.06 16:41:00 41.94

16:42:24 3.37 50.71 16:42:00 43.42

16:43:24 3.35 52.43 16:43:00 43.58

16:44:24 3.35 55.66 16:44:00 43.59

16:45:24 3.37 57.39 16:45:00 43.54

16:46:24 3.35 58.62 16:46:00 43.54

16:47:24 3.29 55.95

16:48:24 3.25 54.42

16:49:24 0.38 37.56

16:50:24 -0.05 35.24 O2 Zero N0x Mid

16:51:24 3.22 14.89

16:52:24 4.92 0.03 O2 Mid N0x Zero

 Plant Value

16:53:49 4.97 0.04 O2 NOx NOx NOx

16:54:49 4.35 15.72 % PPM PPM PPM

16:55:49 3.34 55.33 3.33 55.85 49.10 16:55:00 49.26

16:56:49 3.33 56.07 16:56:00 49.26

16:57:49 3.35 56.18 16:57:00 49.26

16:58:49 3.31 56.91 16:58:00 49.26

16:59:49 3.30 57.90 16:59:00 48.67

17:00:49 3.31 58.85 17:00:00 48.53

17:01:49 3.33 57.02 17:01:00 49.40

17:02:49 3.30 52.70 17:02:00 49.35

17:03:49 3.34 48.45 17:03:00 49.35

17:04:49 3.36 49.55 17:04:00 49.35

17:05:49 3.41 53.40 17:05:00 49.39

17:06:49 3.41 57.83 17:06:00 49.45

17:07:49 3.37 56.94 17:07:00 49.41

17:08:49 3.32 56.02 17:08:00 48.68

17:09:49 3.29 58.02 17:09:00 48.31

Run 10

CEM Data

Run 8

CEM Data

Run 9

CEM Data

Post-Test Bias

Run 10

Run 8

Post-Test Bias

Run 9
17:10:49 3.34 59.19 17:10:00 49.03

17:11:49 3.34 60.27 17:11:00 49.02

17:12:49 3.27 59.27 17:12:00 49.07

17:13:49 3.29 56.46 17:13:00 49.07

17:14:49 3.31 53.53 17:14:00 49.03

17:15:49 3.31 52.90 17:15:00 48.98

17:16:49 3.34 55.97

17:17:49 3.40 54.95

17:18:49 5.03 4.87 O2 Mid

17:19:49 4.96 0.04 N0x Zero

17:20:49 3.33 7.93

17:21:49 -0.05 35.07

17:22:49 -0.05 35.31 O2 Zero N0x Mid

17:23:49 -0.05 35.39

 Plant Value

17:24:34 -0.05 35.41 O2 NOx NOx NOx

17:25:34 1.38 42.12 % PPM PPM PPM

17:26:34 3.36 56.31 3.33 57.18 49.42 17:26:00 48.25

17:27:34 3.32 57.47 17:27:00 47.82

17:28:34 3.30 57.25 17:28:00 48.41

17:29:34 3.32 55.98 17:29:00 48.41

17:30:34 3.31 55.96 17:30:00 48.41

17:31:34 3.35 57.72 17:31:00 48.37

17:32:34 3.37 59.98 17:32:00 48.36

17:33:34 3.37 59.01 17:33:00 48.41

17:34:34 3.35 59.16 17:34:00 48.41

17:35:34 3.34 58.44 17:35:00 48.45

17:36:34 3.36 60.71 17:36:00 49.73

17:37:34 3.37 64.65 17:37:00 51.37

17:38:34 3.38 63.12 17:38:00 51.32

17:39:34 3.29 60.27 17:39:00 51.32

17:40:34 3.23 58.52 17:40:00 51.32

17:41:34 3.28 54.61 17:41:00 51.28

17:42:34 3.33 51.86 17:42:00 51.27

17:43:34 3.32 51.33 17:43:00 51.32

17:44:34 3.35 52.62 17:44:00 51.32

17:45:34 3.35 53.41 17:45:00 48.84

17:46:34 3.30 52.47 17:46:00 45.43

17:47:34 3.26 49.66

17:48:34 3.28 46.03

17:49:34 0.32 37.10

17:50:34 -0.05 35.24 O2 Zero

17:51:34 -0.05 35.10 N0x Mid

17:52:34 1.42 28.22

17:53:34 4.95 0.57 N0x Zero

17:54:34 4.96 0.62 O2 Mid

 Plant Value

17:54:55 4.96 0.66 O2 NOx NOx NOx

17:55:55 4.35 14.41 % PPM PPM PPM

17:56:55 3.33 46.37 3.33 44.36 42.17 17:56:00 41.19

17:57:55 3.29 44.87 17:57:00 41.19

17:58:55 3.28 42.12 17:58:00 41.19

17:59:55 3.28 40.84 17:59:00 41.19

18:00:55 3.30 40.44 18:00:00 41.19

18:01:55 3.35 41.16 18:01:00 41.19

18:02:55 3.34 43.64 18:02:00 41.19

18:03:55 3.33 48.10 18:03:00 41.98

18:04:55 3.33 48.34 18:04:00 43.02

18:05:55 3.32 45.33 18:05:00 43.01

18:06:55 3.24 42.24 18:06:00 43.07

18:07:55 3.25 40.73 18:07:00 43.11

18:08:55 3.31 40.95 18:08:00 43.12

18:09:55 3.35 43.77 18:09:00 43.07

18:10:55 3.35 45.48 18:10:00 43.07

18:11:55 3.35 45.87 18:11:00 43.03

18:12:55 3.33 43.91 18:12:00 42.62

18:13:55 3.34 42.17 18:13:00 42.05

18:14:55 3.35 43.05 18:14:00 41.98

18:15:55 3.40 47.63 18:15:00 42.04

18:16:55 3.43 54.47 18:16:00 42.00

18:17:55 3.39 60.70

18:18:55 3.32 57.97

18:19:55 5.03 5.06

18:20:55 4.97 0.36 O2 Zero N0x Mid

18:21:55 2.59 13.57

18:22:55 -0.05 34.58 O2 Mid N0x Zero

Run 11

CEM Data

Run 12

Post-Test Bias

Run 12

Post-Test Bias

Post-Test Bias

Run 11
Duration 00:19:41

00:00 00:10 00:20 00:30 00:40 

CRNF NH3 Plant NOx RATA, CAL & Bias, 10/11/07

0

102030405060708090

100

%

o

f

S

c

a

l

e

00:00 00:10 00:20 00:30 00:40 

O2 ( % )NOx (ppm)

 0.095 35.12

O2 - Min NOx Mi

SP - 1 BIAS

ON

OFF

Bias On
Duration 00:28:29

00:00 00:05 00:10 00:15 00:20 00:25 00:30 00:35 00:40 00:45 

CRNF NH3 Plant NOx RATA_ RUN 1 - 10/11/07

0

102030405060708090

100

%

o

f

R

ange

00:00 00:05 00:10 00:15 00:20 00:25 00:30 00:35 00:40 00:45 

O2 (%)NOx ppm

 5.00

 0.036

O2 - Min AvNOx Min A

SP - 1 SP - 2 SP - 3 Bias
Duration 00:29:07

00:00 00:05 00:10 00:15 00:20 00:25 00:30 00:35 00:40 00:45 

CRNF NH3 Plant NOx RATA_ RUN 2 - 10/11/07

0

102030405060708090

100

%

o

f

R

ange

00:00 00:05 00:10 00:15 00:20 00:25 00:30 00:35 00:40 00:45 

O2 (%)NOx ppm

 0.11

 35.11

O2 - Min AvNOx Min A

SP - 1 SP - 2 SP - 3 Bias
Duration 00:28:11

00:00 00:05 00:10 00:15 00:20 00:25 00:30 00:35 00:40 00:45 

CRNF NH3 Plant NOx RATA_ RUN 3 - 10/11/07

0

102030405060708090

100

%

o

f

R

ange

00:00 00:05 00:10 00:15 00:20 00:25 00:30 00:35 00:40 00:45 

O2 (%)NOx ppm

 5.01

 0.036

O2 - Min AvNOx Min A

SP - 1 SP - 2 SP - 3 Bias
Duration 00:28:48

00:00 00:05 00:10 00:15 00:20 00:25 00:30 00:35 00:40 00:45 

CRNF NH3 Plant NOx RATA_ RUN 4 - 10/11/07

0

102030405060708090

100

%

o

f

R

ange

00:00 00:05 00:10 00:15 00:20 00:25 00:30 00:35 00:40 00:45 

O2 (%)NOx ppm

 0.14

 34.93

O2 - Min AvNOx Min A

SP - 1 SP - 2 SP - 3 Bias
Duration 00:28:50

00:00 00:05 00:10 00:15 00:20 00:25 00:30 00:35 00:40 00:45 

CRNF NH3 Plant NOx RATA_ RUN 5 - 10/11/07

0

102030405060708090

100

%

o

f

R

ange

00:00 00:05 00:10 00:15 00:20 00:25 00:30 00:35 00:40 00:45 

O2 (%)NOx ppm

 5.01

 0.036

O2 - Min AvNOx Min A

SP - 1 SP - 2 SP - 3 Bias
Duration 00:29:48

00:00 00:05 00:10 00:15 00:20 00:25 00:30 00:35 00:40 00:45 

CRNF NH3 Plant NOx RATA_ RUN 6 - 10/11/07

0

102030405060708090

100

%

o

f

R

ange

00:00 00:05 00:10 00:15 00:20 00:25 00:30 00:35 00:40 00:45 

O2 (%)NOx ppm

 0.0010

 35.07

O2 - Min AvNOx Min A

SP - 1 SP - 2 SP - 3 Bias
Duration 00:29:36

00:00 00:05 00:10 00:15 00:20 00:25 00:30 00:35 00:40 00:45 

CRNF NH3 Plant NOx RATA_ RUN 7 - 10/11/07

0

102030405060708090

100

%

o

f

R

ange

00:00 00:05 00:10 00:15 00:20 00:25 00:30 00:35 00:40 00:45 

O2 (%)NOx ppm

 4.97

 0.036

O2 - Min AvNOx Min A

SP - 1 SP - 2 SP - 3 Bias
Duration 00:28:20

00:00 00:05 00:10 00:15 00:20 00:25 00:30 00:35 00:40 00:45 

CRNF NH3 Plant NOx RATA_ RUN 8 - 10/11/07

0

102030405060708090

100

%

o

f

R

ange

00:00 00:05 00:10 00:15 00:20 00:25 00:30 00:35 00:40 00:45 

O2 (%)NOx ppm

 -0.048

 35.73

O2 - Min AvNOx Min A

SP - 1 SP - 2 SP - 3 Bias
Duration 00:28:10

00:00 00:05 00:10 00:15 00:20 00:25 00:30 00:35 00:40 00:45 

CRNF NH3 Plant NOx RATA_ RUN 9 - 10/11/07

0

102030405060708090

100

%

o

f

R

ange

00:00 00:05 00:10 00:15 00:20 00:25 00:30 00:35 00:40 00:45 

O2 (%)NOx ppm

 4.92

 0.036

O2 - Min AvNOx Min A

SP - 1 SP - 2 SP - 3 Bias
Duration 00:30:32

00:00 00:05 00:10 00:15 00:20 00:25 00:30 00:35 00:40 00:45 

CRNF NH3 Plant NOx RATA_ RUN 10 - 10/11/07

0

102030405060708090

100

%

o

f

R

ange

00:00 00:05 00:10 00:15 00:20 00:25 00:30 00:35 00:40 00:45 

O2 (%)NOx ppm

 -0.050

 35.37

O2 - Min AvNOx Min A

SP - 1 SP - 2 SP - 3 Bias
Duration 00:30:01

00:00 00:05 00:10 00:15 00:20 00:25 00:30 00:35 00:40 00:45 

CRNF NH3 Plant NOx RATA_ RUN 11 - 10/11/07

0

102030405060708090

100

%

o

f

R

ange

00:00 00:05 00:10 00:15 00:20 00:25 00:30 00:35 00:40 00:45 

O2 (%)NOx ppm

 4.96 0.64

O2 - Min AvNOx Min A

SP - 1 SP - 2 SP - 3 Bias
Duration 00:29:28

00:00 00:05 00:10 00:15 00:20 00:25 00:30 00:35 00:40 00:45 

CRNF NH3 Plant NOx RATA_ RUN 12 - 10/11/07

0

102030405060708090

100

%

o

f

R

ange

00:00 00:05 00:10 00:15 00:20 00:25 00:30 00:35 00:40 00:45 

O2 (%)NOx ppm

 -0.048

 34.60

O2 - Min AvNOx Min A

SP - 1 SP - 2 SP - 3 Bias
APPENDIX B - CEMS 7 DAY DRIFT DATA
CEM x

 CALIBRATION DRIFT CHECK (NO )

Facility: Coffeyville Resources Nitrogen Fertilizers Analyzer Model # - Ametek 4000B Analyzer Serial # 8161T

Acceptable Criteria: <=+/- 2.5% of span each day for 

Seven consecutive days.

SPAN 0 500

LOW LEVEL CALIBRATION GAS

D ate Tim e

Calibration 

Gas Value

(ppm V)

Initial M onitor

Response

 (ppm 2.4V)

Absolute

Difference 

(ppm V)

Percent of

Span

 (%)

Comments M onitor Cal/Checked By

 (Signature)

11/09/07 6:05 0 -.77 0.77 0.15% PASS B.A.M.

11/10/07 6:04 0 4.23 4.23 0.85% PASS B.A.M.

11/11/07 6:04 0 -5.01 5.01 1.00% PASS B.A.M.

11/12/07 6:04 0 4.33 4.33 0.87% PASS B.A.M.

11/12/07 6:04 0 1.91 1.91 0.38% PASS B.A.M.

11/14/07 6:03 0 1.17 1.17 0.23% PASS B.A.M.

11/15/07 6:04 0 -1.41 1.41 0.28% PASS B.A.M.

HIGH LEVEL CALIBRATION GAS

D ate Tim e

Calibration 

Gas Value

 (ppm V)

Initial M onitor

Response 

(ppm V)

Absolute 

Differencet 

(ppm V)

Percent of

Span

(%)

Comments M onitor Cal/Checked By

 (Signature)

11/09/07 6:12 444 437.1 6.9 1.38% PASS B.A.M.

11/10/07 6:12 444 443.6 0.4 0.08% PASS B.A.M.

11/11/07 6:12 444 436.7 7.3 1.46% PASS B.A.M.

11/12/07 6:12 444 439.2 4.8 0.96% PASS B.A.M.

11/12/07 6:12 444 447.1 3.1 0.62% PASS B.A.M.

11/14/07 6:12 444 435.5 8.5 1.70% PASS B.A.M.

11/15/07 6:12 444 453.8 9.8 1.96% PASS B.A.M.

Calibration Drift = [ABS (Monitor Response - Calibration Value)/CEM SPAN *100

Specification: Monitor Calibration Drift 
APPENDIX C - UNIT EMISSION ANALYSIS
Unit Flow2.xls

Run 1 Stack Flow Worksheet

As =

ID =

π =

=

As =  ft2 As =  m2

As =  ft2 As =  m2

As = ft2 As = m2

Ps = Static pressure inside the stack measured in inchesof water "H2O

Pbar =

Pstd = Standard Barometric Pressure 

Pcor =

Kflow =

Kflow =( / )x x 60 =

As

Kflow =( / )x x 60 =

As

Area of the Stack (L x W) or (π x (ID/2)

2

)

Kflow scm/min

28.95

K-Flow is the flow that would exist in the stack based on the ambient pressure and the 

internal pressure, and corrected to standard conditions

28.95 29.92 9.393 545.37

CNRF

12:10

3.1415927 as a pre-defined constant for circular geometry

inside diameter of the stack wall in inches

End Time

ID 

29.92 0.873 50.67

Pcor Pstd

0.87

Tail Gas

1/11/2008

11:00

L (ength)

1 inch

2.54 cm

105.41

AREA OF THE STACK

Plant

Unit

Date

Start Time

41.50 ID 

L (ength)

W (idth)

centimeters

Ambient barometric pressure in inches of Mercury "Hg

W (idth)

9.39 0.87

KINETIC FLOW IN THE STACK

inches

9.39

" H2O

28.95 "Hg

-3.10

29.18

29.92

sec/min

Corrected Barometric Pressure

"Hg

"Hg

Pcor Pstd sec/min Kflow scf/min

RUN 1
Unit Flow2.xls

Run 1 Stack Flow Worksheet

=

=

= =

1

2

3

4

5

6

SG

mL

Vic

mL x = scf

Vic Vk

Allowing that flue gas is composed of CO2 + O2 + N2

=

=

=

=

100 % - ( + ) =

+ +=

g CO2/mol

1.07

g O2/mol

26.64

g N2/mol

0.66

95.16

%N2

Distribution of components of the flue gas

Md

28.3736 g/mol of dry flue gas

1.5

%O2

3.34

%CO2

%O2

%N2

Dry Molecular Weight of Theoretical Flue Gas

Measured Percentage of CO2 in the Flue Gas

Measured Percentage of O2 in the Flue Gas

Calculated Percentage of N2 in the Flue Gas

Md

%CO2

scm

Dry Molecular Weight. 

0.588

Vw std

12.5 0.04707 0.01666

Vw std

0

Total Volume of Water Collected 12.5

134.8

11

1.5

0

Difference

134.8

108.0

104.5

104.9

119.0

106.0

104.9

Impinger weights in grams

Impinger # Initial Final

Vk

Total volume of Water collected in Impinger Train

Vapor Constant to correct mL of water to scf of water vapor 0.04707

Vic

Vw std

Volume of Water Vapor Corrected to Standard Conditions

Volume of Water Vapor in gas sample Corrected to Standard Conditions
Unit Flow2.xls

Run 1 Stack Flow Worksheet

=

=

=

=

=

=

=

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

1.001 x x ( / ) = 9

Y 10

11

12

x = 13

14

15

x = 16

17

18

19

20

/ ( + ) / 100 = 21

22

23

24

25

averages

Average of the DGM inlet and outlet temperatures o

F

scf

71.0

dscf dscm/dscf Vm std

Vw std

20.013 0.028317 0.5667 dscm

0.5884

Vw std

20.013

Vm std

1.1341

E1

2.86%

Bws

20.600

Vdgm

531.5

Pc Tdgm

29.231

17.647 Ideal Gas Constant

72.0 71.0 0.70

0.70

0.70

0.70

0.70

0.70

0.70

∆H

" H2O

0.70

0.70

0.70

0.70

0.70

0.70

71.0

71.0

71.0

71.0

71.0

71.0

71.0

71.0

71.0

71.0

71.0

72.0

72.0

72.0

72.0

Inlet

72.0

72.0

72.0

Outlet

DGM Temperatures o

F

20.013

Vm std

72.0

72.0

72.0

72.0

72.0

Dry Gas Meter Readings

Initial Final

0.5884

103.500 124.100

20.6

Vdgm

1.1341

E1

Tavg

Pc

Percentage of Moisture by Volume

Volume of gas measured by the Dry Gas Meter (DGM)

Dry Gas Meter Volume corrected to standard conditions

Tavg corrected to standard temperature Rankin ( o

F +460)

Y correction Factor for DGM, Determined at calibration of DGM

DGM Pressure[(average of Delta H readings / 13.6) + Pbar]

Vm std

Vdgm

Percent Moisture by Volume of the Stack Flue Gases

Tdgm

Y

Bws
Unit Flow2.xls

Run 1 Stack Flow Worksheet

=

=

=

( x ) + ( x ) =

=

=

=

= Average temperature across the stack in Rankin (Ts + 460)

= Ts

xx= 1 o

F

avg E1 2 o

F

3 o

F

4 o

F

( / ( x ))

1/2 = 5 o

F

6 o

F

7 o

F

8 o

F

9 o

F

10 o

F

x = 11 o

F

12 o

F

13 o

F

14 o

F

= fps 15 o

F

16 o

F

= mps 17 o

F

18 o

F

19 o

F

20 o

F

21 o

F

22 o

F

23 o

F

24 o

F

25 o

F

Averages

355

353

352

358

Wet Molecular weight of the Flue Gas

Vs

E1

85.48

Kp

MW H2O

Ms

Pdg Percentage of dry gas in the sample. (100 % - Bws)

Wet Molecular Weight of the flue gas measured

Molecular weight of water (18 g/mol)

Flue gas velocity in feet per second

2.86%

Bws MW H2O

97.14% 18

Pdg

28.374

Md

28.077

Ms

Ts cor

Pitot Tube Constant 85.48

Pitot Tube Coefficient 0.84

Differential pressure across the Pitot Tube in inches of Water "H 2O

Kp

Cp

∆P

g/mol

2.19 357

4.82

∆P

4.82

2.19 359

Stack Temp

4.97

4.77

4.56

4.26

2.12

2.11

4.36

4.82

4.56

4.51

4.46

2.23

2.18

2.14

2.14

2.06

2.09

2.19

2.04

340

355

360

357

357

340

4.588 2.14 353.6

153.81

Vs Metric

153.74 1.00 153.81

E2 Vs

Stack Gas Velocity in feet per Second

28.077

Point

4.16

0.84 2.14119 153.74

Cp

Ts cor

813.583

Pcor

28.95

Ms

1.00

E2

Vs English 

46.88
Unit Flow2.xls

Run 1 Stack Flow Worksheet

AVF =

x x=

x x=

Tstd =

Tk =

x x = x 60 =

x 60 =

Qsd =

Pk =

Tstd =

Tk =

x x x = x 60 =

x x x = x 60 =

92,492.22

SVF in scm/hr

3,266,314.20

SVF in scf/hr

1,541.54

SVF in scm/min

As

Kflow SVF in scf/min

89,850.20

Qsd Nm3

/hr

97.14% 2,454.72

Pdg AVF Tk Pk Qsd Nm3

/min

0.649 0.968 1,497.50

sec/min Vs

Dry Standard Volumetric Flow in the stack (Normal Volumetric Units)

0.649 153.809 545.37 54,438.57

Tk Vs

Temperature correction Coefficient (Tstd/Ts cor)

Temperature correction Coefficient (Tstd/Ts cor)

Pdg AVF Tk Pk Qsd dsft3

/min

97.14% 0.649 0.968

9.39

Actual Volumetric Flow in the stack

3,173,029.85

60 46.88 0.87

Actual Volumetric Flow In the Stack

60

sec/min

153.81

Vs

ft3/min

Qsd dsft3

/hr

As AVF

2,454.72 m3

/min

Standard Temperature in degrees Rankin 528

Pressure correction coefficient (Pcor/Pstd)

86,687.60 52,883.83

86,687.60

AVF

Dry Standard (Normal) Volumetric Flow Rate 

Standard Volumetric Flow in the Stack

Standard Temperature in degrees Rankin 528
Unit Flow2.xls

Run 1 Stack Flow Worksheet

x /= =

x x x 60 =

lb NO2/ ton HNO3 NO2/ppm-ton of HNO3

24.98

Ton/hr HNO3

0.712 0.0152

ng/hr NOX

x106 8.07E+06 = 8.0720E+12

Pdg SVF scm/min mg/hr NOX

1,541.54

mg/dscm NOX

89.838 97.14%

Mass Per Hour Emissions of Pollutants

Conversion of ppm to mg/Nm3

 and then to ng/Nm3

46.95

ppm NOx

46.000

MW NOx

24.04

l/mol mg/dscm NOx

89.838 8.984E+07

ng/dscm NOx

17.80 75.27

lb/hr NOX ton/yr NOX
FI1624x FI1603x FIC1425x FI1405x FI1612x FIC1801x AI1805x TI1409x AI1454x

FI1624.PV FI1603.PV FIC1425.PV FI1405.PV FI1612.PV FIC1801.PV AI1805.PV TI1409.PV AI1454.PVSCFM SCFM LB/HR SCFM LB/HR SCFM PPM DEGF %

PROCESS 

AIR OG/AIR 

MIXER

BLEACH AIR TO 

BLEACHER

ACID PLANT 

SUPPLEMENTAL 

O2 FLOW

H.P.OFF-GAS 

TO 

CONVERTER

NITRIC ACID 

PRODUCTION

H.P.OFF-GAS 

NOX ABATOR

NOx EMISSION 

EXHAUST STK

GAUZE 

TEMPERATURE

TAIL GS OXY 

EX 

ABSORBER

Measured 

Enriched Air

HP Off Gas 

+ Inerts Pure O2

Acid 

Production

Compressed Air 

Flow

Total Stac

Flow

Timestamp mol/hr mol/hr mol/hr mol/hr mol/hr mol/hr 

1/11/2008 10:00 36104.4 9264.4 5544.8 11557.9 85091.1 31.9 26.4 1693.3 2.9 7172.9 308.9 173.3 749.3 7280.0 6266.81/11/2008 10:05 36074.0 9243.7 5528.2 11525.3 84299.3 31.9 30.8 1694.3 2.9 7164.9 308.0 172.8 742.3 7191.4 6190.71/11/2008 10:10 36230.5 9298.6 5551.1 11471.3 85774.8 32.0 36.2 1694.0 2.8 7198.3 306.6 173.5 755.3 7318.9 6291.51/11/2008 10:15 36234.6 9277.3 5541.4 11469.5 85896.7 32.1 30.4 1696.9 2.9 7195.6 306.5 173.2 756.4 7352.7 6322.91/11/2008 10:20 36207.4 9251.4 5543.8 11357.9 86052.1 32.3 27.4 1695.5 2.8 7187.2 303.5 173.2 757.8 7349.3 6313.81/11/2008 10:25 36211.1 9268.5 5538.4 11310.1 85216.2 32.3 24.5 1694.1 2.9 7190.5 302.3 173.1 750.4 7295.9 6273.81/11/2008 10:30 36200.8 9270.4 5555.3 11418.1 83273.1 32.2 23.1 1693.4 3.0 7189.1 305.2 173.6 733.3 7121.5 6136.91/11/2008 10:35 36209.6 9288.3 5563.1 11543.5 85433.9 32.1 28.2 1693.5 2.9 7193.4 308.5 173.9 752.3 7316.5 6297.51/11/2008 10:40 36212.5 9284.1 5537.1 11509.4 87271.6 32.0 22.5 1692.6 2.9 7193.1 307.6 173.0 768.5 7480.1 6427.11/11/2008 10:45 36163.3 9264.2 5561.5 11480.7 84285.8 31.7 11.1 1690.5 2.9 7182.2 306.8 173.8 742.2 7204.9 6204.41/11/2008 10:50 36193.4 9278.4 5565.4 11407.9 84647.4 31.7 24.8 1698.9 2.9 7189.2 304.9 173.9 745.4 7233.3 6224.61/11/2008 10:55 36156.5 9270.0 5568.6 11283.9 86914.2 32.0 41.1 1697.4 2.8 7182.1 301.6 174.0 765.3 7428.5 6376.61/11/2008 11:00 36170.4 9254.3 5585.0 11272.5 83867.6 32.0 35.4 1693.2 2.9 7181.8 301.3 174.5 738.5 7158.7 6160.7 

Date

 (mm/dd/yy hh)

Measured 

Enriched Air 

(FI1603 & 

FI1624)

HP Off Gas 

Inerts 

including 

CO2

Pure O2 

Added 

(FIC1425)

HNO3 

Production

Corrected 

Compressed Air 

Flow

Total Stac

mol/hr mol/hr mol/hr mol/hr mol/hr mol/hr 

10/11/07 12:00 7529.4 330.5 168.7 783.9 7561.7 6496.1 10/11/07 13:00 7509.0 330.1 170.1 780.6 7524.9 6466.9 10/11/07 14:00 7487.8 328.1 170.1 791.8 7656.4 6574.1 10/11/07 15:00 7478.8 327.7 170.2 780.0 7546.6 6487.5 10/11/07 16:00 7469.9 327.6 170.4 790.7 7659.0 6578.7 10/11/07 17:00 7467.3 328.3 170.5 786.5 7613.1 6542.1 

\\Wtx_sbs1\ATD\Clients - Active\Coffeyville Resources Nitrogen Fertilizer\5283.02\RATA Follow Up Data 1-11-08der (3).xls
APPENDIX D - GAS CALIBRATION CERTIFICATES




Instrument Certification

All instruments are certified by the vendors with regards to interference, response and

repeatability. The following limits are stated for the instrumentation utilized;

• Resolution: 0.1 ppm

• Noise: Less then 0.5% of full scale

• Linearity: +/- 0-.5% of full scale

• Repeatability: Better then 0.5% of full scale

• Zero and Span drift: Less then 0.5% of full scale in 168 hours.

• Instrument Response Time: 1.5 to 20 seconds (instrument and configuration dependant)

• All interference < 1%

•

All repairs are performed by certified manufacturer representatives

System Sample Response:

Denovo operates the sample system at a constant flow rate of approximately 5 liters / minute and

8 psi sample manifold pressure. Sample line suction vacuum is allowed to fluctuate with the

system demands. Excess sample not directed to the analyzers is externally dumped to

atmosphere.

Using 100 feet of sample line, the sample system has been calculated to have a total volume

(from sample probe to instrument) of approximately 2.1 liters resulting in an initial sample

response time of 25 seconds. The same configuration, including the bias loop has a calculated

total volume of 3.6 liters resulting in an initial bias response time of 43 seconds.
Model 600 HCLD 

NO Interference Data 

Interference Response 

Date of Test 7/26/2006 

Analyzer Type NO 

Model No. 600-HCLD 

Serial No. S050301 

Calibration Span 3000ppm 

 

 

Test Gas Type Concentration Analyzer Response 

 (ppm) Wet Dry 

H2O 2.5% 0 0 

CO2 5% 0 0 

CO2 15% 0 0 

CO 50 0 0 

CH4 50 0 0 

SO2 N/A N/A N/A 

NH3 15 0 0 

NO N/A N/A N/A 

N2O 9 0 0 

NO2 N/A N/A N/A 

APPENDIX E - EXAMPLE CALCULATIONS
EXAMPLE CALCULATIONS

Correction for raw emission concentrations to bias/drift corrected values:

Eq. 1: 

where:

Ccorrected = Average calibration corrected concentration, ppm or percent

Cmeasured = Average measured concentration, ppm, or percent

CO = Average of pre- and post-test system bias response for the zero gas,

ppm or percent

Cm = Average of pre- and post-test system bias response for the upscale

gas, ppm or percent

Cma = Actual concentration of the upscale gas, ppm or percent

Relative Accuracy Calculation:

Eq. 2: 

where:

D = Arithmetic mean of the differences between the RM and CEMS values

n = Number of data points

di = Difference between the RM and CEMS for individual data points

Standard Deviation Calculation:

Eq. 3:

where:

Sd = Standard deviation of the difference between the RM and CEMS value
Confidence Coefficient Calculation:

Eq. 4: 

where:

CC = Two Tailed confidence coefficient corresponding to 2.5% error

0.975 t = t-value correcting for n-1 degrees of freedom = 2.306

Relative Accuracy of CEMS to RM Calculation:

Eq. 5:

where:

RA = Relative accuracy of the CEMS system to the RM

D = Absolute value of the mean of the differences

CC = Absolute value of the confidence coefficient

RM = Average RM value or the applicable emission standard

Emission Rate Calculation lbs/MMBtu:

where:

E = Pollutant emission rate, ng/J (lbs/million Btu).

Ccorrected = Average calibration corrected concentration, ppm or percent

MW = Molecular weight of compound, lbs/lb-mol

Fd = Volume of combustion components per unit of heat content, scm/J

(scf/million Btu).

%O2d = Concentration of oxygen on a dry basis, percent. 
APPENDIX F - QUALITY ASSURANCE
QUALITY ASSURANCE / QUALITY CONTROL

Specific quality control measures were used to insure the generation of reliable data from all

sampling and analysis activities. Proper collection and organization of information followed by clear

and concise reporting of the data was a primary goal in the project.

The objective of a quality assurance/quality control(QA/QC) program is to ensure that the precision

and accuracy of all environmental data generated by DeNovo-nv, Inc. is commensurate with data

quality objectives (DQOs). DQOs are based on a common understanding of the intended end

use(s) of the data, the measurement process, and the availability of resources. Once DQOs are

established, formally or informally, QC protocol can be defined for the measurements.

In this project, the final data users will be Coffeyville Resources Nitrogen Fertilizers, USEPA Region

VII and the State of Kansas. The DQOs for this project are to generate legally defensible data to

be used to demonstrate compliance with Federal regulations associated with NSPS Subpart G and

state operating permit requirements related to annual certification of continuous emission

monitoring systems (CEMS).

Two basic goals of a QC program are to:

1) Control errors; and

2) Verify that the entire analytical method is operating within acceptable performance

limits.

Use of qualified personnel, reliable and well-maintained equipment, appropriate calibrations and

standards, and close supervision of all operations are important components of the QC program.

The following sections describe the QC results for maintaining instruments and equipment in a

state of calibration (defines the accuracy or bias error), results for measuring a continuously

maintained state of cleanliness (eliminates interference or contamination), and the paper trail which

documents that the methods were performed to instructions, calibrated within method performance

standards, and/or traceable to National Technical Information Services (NTIS) standard reference

materials. Standards of QA set forth in the Quality Assurance Handbook for Air Pollution

Measurement Systems, Volume III (USEPA-600/4-77-027b) were strictly followed.
FIELD DATA REDUCTION

Example calculations are used in the field to check on sampling conditions and a list of formulas

used to reduce the field data. The data collected was reviewed in the field by the Project Manager.

Errors or discrepancies were noted on the data sheet. Appendices of this report present the

standardized forms that were used to record field sampling data.

INTERNAL QC CHECKS AND FREQUENCY

QC checks were performed to ensure the collection of representative samples and the generation

of valid analytical results of these samples. These checks were performed by project participants

throughout the program.

QA PROCEDURES

The following QA procedures were implemented during this test program:

! Use of designated sampling and analytical equipment. The sampling equipment

used in this test met all calibration and operating criteria of the applicable Kansas

Department of Health and Environment and USEPA Methods.

! Sampling system was calibrated and operated according to Kansas Department of

Health and Environment and USEPA documented procedures. All site activities

including audit results were logged into the daily site book. 

! Equipment calibration. The portable sampling equipment is calibrated with two

concentrations of USEPA Protocol 1 gasses and a zero gas before the first test.

Calibration span settings are checked after each run. Other test equipment is

calibrated in accordance with USEPA specifications in Quality Assurance Handbook

for Air Pollution Measurement Systems, Volume III (USEPA-600/4-77-027b).