US Department of Transportation Exemption Request Pursuant to Section 333 of

the FAA

Reform Act and Part 11 of the Federal Aviation

February 2 5 , 2016

Benjamin R. Nevill e Drone's Eye llc

. 62 Dickson D r Plymouth, MA 0236 0 Brneville13@gmail.com

U.S Department of Transportation Docket Management System 1200 New Jersey Ave., SE Washington DC 20590

Re: Exemption Request Pursuant to Section 333 of the FAA Reform Act and Part

11 of the Federal Aviation Regulations from: 14 CFR 21 subpart H; 14 CFR 45.23(b); 14 CFR 61.113(a) and (b); 14 CFR 91.7(a); 14 CFR91.9(b)(2); 14 CFR 91.103; 14 CFR 91.109; 14 CFR 91.119(c); 14 CFR 91.121; 14 CFR 91.151(a); 14 CFR 91.203(a) and (b); 14 CF R 91.405 (a); 14 CFR 91.407 (a) (1) 14 CFR 91.409 (a)(1) and (2); 14 CFR 91.417(a) and (b)

The exemption is in the public interest. Pursuant to the authority contained in 49

U .S.C. 106(f), 40113, and 44701.

Dear Sir or Madam:

Pursuant to Section 333 of the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012 (the "Reform Act") and 14 CFR Part 11 of Unmanned Aircraft Systems (UAS), Benjamin R. Nevill e hereby applies for an exemption from the listed Federal Aviation Regulations ("FARs") to allow commercial operation of Designated UAS, provided such operations are conducted within and under the conditions outlined herein or as may be established by the FAA as required by Section 333.

Thank you in advance for your consideration.Commerci al operation of an UAS, as described herein, which are equipped with camera(s) and sensors, would provide professional services in the following

areas:

1. Photography / Videography

2. Inspections

3. S earch and rescue

4. R eal estate

5. P ublic safety

6. D isaster relief

7. R apid response

8. D amage assesments

9. F lood monitoring

10. W ild fire monitoring drought monitoring

11. C oastal restoration

12. B each erosion

13. W ildlife counts

14. E nvironmental conservation

15. C ommercial fishing observations

16. P rotected species observations/ counts

17. C harter boat filming

18. M arine mammal strandings

19. S hark safety

20. W etland monitoring

21. W atershed planning

22. R enewable energy mapping and monitoring

23. O il spill tracking

24. P ipe line monitoring

25. I rrigation land mapping

26. P owerline inspections

27. B ridge inspections

28. I mpervious suface mapping

29. F arm pollution mapping/ investigations

30. F arm herding

31. S pecies deterrent

32. B oundry mapping

33. C rop count

34. C anopy cover monitoring

35. L eaf area index

36. P lant height

37. D etassling

38. Y ield monitoring

39. F o rest biomass

40. F orest health

41. F orest disease detection42. L and survey

43. A erial survey

44. A dvertising/ prom

45. O tional videos for parks, golf course, resorts

46. B eaches, hotels, mountain resorts

47. V irtual tours

48. S ecurity

49. P rivate investigator

50. W eddings

51. F unerals

52. P arties

53. C onstruct ion inspections

54. I ce fishing safety

55. S hellfish monitoring

56. N ews footage

57. E nvironmental assessment

58. T rail mapping

59. I mpact of construction marine and terrestrial

60. S ki lift inspection

61. I d pollution sources

62. C himney inspection

63. M onitor snow removal

64. L ost pet locator

65. P romotional videos

66. T raffic footage

67. I ce flow monitoring

68. P ouching monitoring

69. W ind turbine inspection

70. R adio tower inspection

71. A rchaeological site mapping

72. H azrd mapping

73. M arine algae bloom monitoring

74. B oat / car shows

As described fully below, the requested exemption would permit the operation of designated UAS as set forth in this document under controlled conditions in the NAS that would be a) limited b) controlled c) predetermined and d) safe. Approval of this exemption would increase public awareness of UAS operations and

enhan ce safety to aid in fulfilling the Secretary of Transportation's (the FAA Administrator's) responsibilities to " .... establish requirements for the safe operation of such aircraft systems in the national airspace system."The name and address of the appl icant is

Benjamin R. Nevill e Drone's Eye llc

. 62 Dickson D r Plymouth, MA 0236 0 Brneville13@gmail.com

From which the exemption is requested : 14 CFR Part 21 subpart H 14 CFR 45.23 (b) 14 CFR 61.113 (a) & (b) 14 CFR 91.7 (a) 14 CFR 91.9 (b) (2)

14 CFR 91.103

14 CFR 91.109 14 CFR 91.119 (c)

14 CFR 91.121 14 CFR 91.151 (a) 14 CFR 91.203 (a) 14 CFR 91.405 (a) 14 CFR 91.407 (a) 14 CFR 91.409 (a) 14 CFR 91.417 (a)

As in Grants of Exemption Nos. 11062 to A straeus Aerial (see Docket No.

FAA

− 2014

− 0352), 11109 to Clayco, Inc. (see Docket No. FAA

− 2014

− 0507), 11112 to VDOS Global, LLC (see Docket No. FAA

− 2014

− 0382), 11213 to Aeryon Labs, Inc. (see Docket No. FAA

− 2014

− 0642), and 12645 to Allied Drones (see

Docket No. FAA

- 2014

- 0804), There is enhanced safety achieved using an unmanned aircraft (UA) with the specifications described by the petitioner and carrying no passengers or crew, rather than a manned aircraft of significantly greater proportions, carrying crew in addition to flammable fuel, gives the FAA good cause to find that the UAS operation enabled by this exemption is in the public interest.

Benjamin R. Nevill e Will operate one or more of the Following model UAS

. D JI Phantom 3 P ro

S afety requirements. The approval of this application presents no national security issues. Regarding the level of safety surrounding the proposed operations and the public benefit, reduction in environmental impacts, including

but not limited to reduced em issions and noise, the grant of the requestedexemption is in the public interest. Accordingly, the applicant graciously requests that the FAA grant the requested exemption.

AIRCRAFT AND EQUIVALENT LEVEL OF SAFETY

The operation limitations proposed for a n equivalent or higher level of safety because operations will further enhance the safety of the persons and/or property using conventional aircraft. These limitations and conditions to which the applicant agrees to adhere to when conducting commercial ope rations under the FAA issued exemption as set forth in the Flight Operations Manual (FOM)

include:

1. The UAS will weigh significantly less than 55 lbs.

2. The UAS, depending on the model in operation, will have a maximum operating speed of no more than 50mph.

3. Flights will be operated within line of sight of the Pilot in Command (PIC) and/or Visual Observer (VO).

4. Maximum flight time for each operational flight will be depending on the UAS model in operation, but will not exceed 30 minutes. Flight s will be terminated at 25% battery power reserve or 30 minutes of flight time whichever occurs first.

5. Flights will be operated at an altitude of no more than 400 feet Above Ground Level (AGL) and not more than 200 feet above an elevated platform from which filming is planned.

6. Minimum crew for each operation will consist of the UAS Pilot and at least one Visual Observer (VO), and may include a third, but separate, Camera Operator (CO).

7. The UAS pilot will be a designated Pilot in Command (PIC) . The PIC will have logged a minimum of 20 hours on the designated UAS.

8. A safety briefing will be performed prior to each day's flights consisting of all the days' Production activities.9. All flight activities will be logged.

10. All flights will oc cur under Visual Flight Rules Meteorological Conditions (VMC) only.

11. The flights will occur in Cla ss G airspace no closer than a mile radius of the geographic center/Airport Reference Point (ARP) of a tower controlled or uncontrolled airport.

12. Flig hts will not be closer than a 5 mile radius of the geographic center/Airport.

13. The operator will do a pre check of aircraft prior to each flight. And log each flight.

14. The operator will obtain verbal/written consent of all persons involved with the planned operation and ensure that only consenting persons will be allowed within 100 feet of the flight operation, and the radius may be reduced to 30 feet based upon an equivalent level of safety determination, as U.S. Department of Transportation require d under the FOM. With the advanced permission of the FSDO, operations at closer range may be approved.

15. The PIC and VO will have been trained in operation of UAS and receive up to

date information for the particular UAS to be operated.

16. The PIC and VO will be able to communicate by voice and/or radio at all

times.

17. The PIC will abide by all rules

18. If the UAS loses communications with the remote controller or loses GPS signal, the UAS will have the capability to return to a predetermined

locat ion within a designated location and land autonomously.

19. The UAS will have the capability to abort a flight in case of emergencies with

an automated "Return Home and Land" function.

20. The UAS will have the capability to abort a flight in case of unp redicted obstacles, weather, or emergencies such as low battery.

21. Any incident, accident, or flight operation that transgresses the lateral or vertical boundaries of the operational area as defined by the applicable COAmust be reported to the FAA's UA S Integration Office (AFS

− 80) within 24 hours. Accidents must be reported to the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) per instructions contained on the NTSB Web site: www.ntsb.gov

.

14 C.F.R. Part 21, Subpart H: Airworthiness Certificates 14 C.F.R. §91.203 (a) (1) Subpart H, entitled Airworthiness Certificates, establishes the procedural requirements for the issuance of airworthiness certificates as required by FAR §91.203 (a) (1). Given the size and limited operating area associated with the

aircraf t to be utilized by the Applicant, an exemption from Part 21 Subpart H meets the requirements of an equivalent level of safety under Part 11 and Section 333 of the Reform Act. The Federal Aviation Act (49 U.S.C.§44701 (f))

and Section 333 of the Reform Act both authorize the FAA to exempt aircraft from the requirement for an airworthiness certificate, upon consideration of the size, weight, speed, operational capability, and proximity to airports and populated areas of the particular UAS. In all cases, an an alysis of these criteria demonstrates that the UAS operated without an airworthiness certificate in the restricted environment and under the conditions proposed will be at least as safe, or safer, than a conventional aircraft (fixed wing or rotorcraft) ope rating with an airworthiness certificate without the restrictions and conditions proposed. The UAS to be operated hereunder is less than 55 lbs. fully loaded, carries neither a pilot nor passenger, carries no explosive materials or flammable liquid fuels, and operates exclusively within a secured and designated area. Unlike other civil aircraft, operations under this exemption will be tightly controlled and monitored by both the operator and under the requirements and in compliance with local public safety requirements. These safety enhancements provide a greater degree of safety to the public and property owners than conventional operations
conducted with airworthiness certificates issued under 14 C.F.R. Part 21, Subpart H. Lastly, application of these same criteria demonstrates that there is no credible threat to national security posed by the UAS, due to its size, speed of operation, location of operation, lack of explosive materials or flammable liquid fuels, and inability to carry a substantial external load.

14 C.F.R. § 45.23 (b). Marking of the Aircraft The regulation requires: When marks include only the Roman capital letter "N" and the registration number is displayed on limited, restricted or light sport category aircraft or experimental or provisio nally certificated aircraft, the operator must also display on that aircraft

near ea ch entrance to the cabin, cockp it, or pilot station, in letters not less than 2 inches nor more than 6 inches high, the words "limited/' "restricted/' "light sport/' "exper imental/' or "provisional/' as applicable

.

14 C.F.R. § 45.23 (b). Marking of the Aircraft The regulation requires: When marks include only the Roman capital letter "N" and the registration number is displayed on limited, restricted or light sport category aircraft or experimental or provisionally certificated aircraft, the operator must also display on that aircraftnear each entrance to the cabin, cockpit, or pilot station, in letters not less than 2 inches nor more than 6 inches high, the words "limited/ ' "restricted/' "light sport/'"experimental/' or "provisional/' as applicable. Even though the UAS will have no airworthiness certificate, an exemption may be needed as the UAS will have no entrance to the cabin, cockpit or pilot station on which the word "Experimental" can be placed. Given the size of the UAS, two inch lettering will be impossible. The word "Experimental" will be placed on the fuselage in compliance with §45.29 (f). US Department of Transportation February 20, 2015 The equivalent level of safety will be provided by having the UAS marked on its fuselage as required by §45.29 (f) where the pilot, observer and others working with the UAS will see the identification of the UAS as "Experimental." 14 C.F.R. § 61.113 (a) and (b The proposed UAS op erations may achieve an equivalent level of safety as achieved by current Regulations because the applicant's UAS do not carry any pilots or passengers nor property. The risks attendant to the It is believed that the operation and limitations set forth in the FOM will equate to the safe operation of the UAS.

14 C.F.R. §91.7{a): Civil Aircraft Airworthiness. The regulation requires that no person may operate a civil aircraft unless it is in airworthy condition. As there will

be no airworthiness certificate issued for the aircraft, should this exemption be granted, no FAA regulatory standard will exist for determining airworthiness. Given the size of the aircraft for maintenance and use of safety checklists prior to each flight, an equivalent leve l of safety will be provided. 14 C.F.R. § 91.9 (b) (2): Civil Aircraft Flight Manual in the Aircraft. Section 91.9 (b) {2) provides: No person may operate a U.S. registered civil aircraft ... (2) For which an Airplane or Rotorcraft Flight Manual is not req uired by §21.5 of this chapter, unless there is available in the aircraft a current approved airplane or Rotorcraft Flight Manual, approved manual material, markings, and placards, or any combination thereof. The UAS, given its size and configuration has n o ability or place to carry such a flight manual on the aircraft, not only because there is no pilot on board, but because there is no room or capacity to carry such an item on the aircraft. The equivalent level of safety will be maintained by keeping the flight manual at the ground control point where the pilot flying the UAS will have immediate access to

it.

14 C.F.R. § 91.103: Preflight Action. This regulation requires each pilot in command to take certain actions before flight to insure the safety of fl ight. As FAA approved rotorcraft flight manuals will not be provided for the aircraft an exemption will be needed. The PIC will take all actions as stated in the FOM in Section 4 under Normal Procedures including but not limited to reviewing weather, fligh t battery requirements, landing and takeoff distances and aircraft performance data before initiation of flight

.

14 C.F.R. §91.109: Flight Instruction. Section 91.103 provides that no person
may operate a civil aircraft (except a manned free balloon) that is being used forflight instruction unless that aircraft has fully functioning dual controls. UAS and remotely piloted aircraft, by their design do not have fully functional dual controls. Flight control is accomplished through the use of a control box t hat

communicates with the aircraft via radi o communications. T he FAA has approved exemptions for flight training without fully functional dual controls for a number of aircraft and for flight instruction in experimental aircraft. The equivalent level of

sa fety is provided by the fact that neither a pilot nor passengers will be carried in the aircraft and by the size and speed of the aircraft.

14 C.F.R. §91.119: Minimum Safe Altitudes. Section 91.119 establishes safe altitudes for operation of civil air craft. Section 91.119 (d) allows helicopters to be operated at less than the minimums prescribed, provided the person operating the helicopter complies with any route or altitudes prescribed for helicopters by the FAA. As this exemption is for a UAS that i s a helicopter and the exemption requests authority to operate at altitudes up to 400 AGL, or not more than 200 above an elevated platform from which filming is planned, an exemption may be needed to allow such operations. As set forth herein, the UAS will never operate at higher than 400 AGL with the exception that in circumstances where the UAS is used to survey or photograph a structure whose height exceeds 400 feet AGL, the UAS will not be operated more than 200 feet above the highest point on the

struc ture. It will however be operated in a restricted area with security perimeter, where buildings and people will not be exposed to operations without their pre

obtained consent. The equivalent level of safety will be achieved given the size, weight, and spe ed of the UAS as well as the location where it is operated. No flight will be taken without the permission of the property owner or local officials. Because of the advance notice to the property owner and participants in the filming activity, all affected individuals will be aware of the planned flight operations. Compared to flight operations with aircraft or rotorcraft weighting fa r more than the maximum SSibs. P roposed herein and the lack of flammable fuel, any risk associated with these operations is fa r less than those presently presented with conventional aircraft operating at or below 500 AGL. In addition, the low altitude operations of the UAS will ensure separation between these UAS operations and the operations of conventional aircraft that must co mply with

Section 91.119.

14 C.F.R. §91.121 Altimeter Settings. This regulation requires each person operating an aircraft to maintain cruising altitude by reference to an altimeter that is set "...to the elevation of the departure airport or an appropriat e altimeter setting available before departure." As the UAS may not have a barometric altimeter, but instead a GPS altitude read out, an U.S. exemption may be needed. An equivalent level of safety will be achieved by the operator, pursuant to the safety ch eck list and live flight data monitoring, confirming the altitude of the launch site shown on the GPS altitude indicator before flight.14 C.F.R. § 91.151(a): Fuel Requirements for Flight in VFR Conditions Section 91.151 (a) prohibits an individual from b eginning "a flight in an airplane under VFR conditions unless (considering wind and forecast weather conditions) there is enough fuel to fly to the first point of intended landing, and, assuming normal cruising speed

- (1) During the day, to fly after that for at least 30 minutes; or (2) At night, to fly after that for at least 45 minutes." The applicant believes that an exemption from 14 CFR §91.151(a) falls within the scope of prior exemptions. Operating the UAS in a tightly controlled area where only peop le and property owners or official representatives who have signed waivers will be allowed does not engender the type of risks that Section 91.151(a) was intended to alleviate given the size and speed of the small UAS. The applicant believes that an equiva lent level of safety can be achieved by limiting flights to 30 minutes or 25% of battery power

- whichever happens first. This restriction would be more than adequate to return the UAS to its planned landing zone from anywhere in its limited operating area.

14 C.F.R. §91.203 (a) and (b): Carrying Civil Aircraft Certification and Registration The regulation provides in pertinent part: (a) Except as provided in§ 91.715, no person may operate a civil aircraft unless it has within it the following: (1) An appropr iate and current airworthiness certificate . . . . (b) No person may operate a civil aircraft unless the airworthiness certificate required by paragraph (a) of this section or a special flight authorization issued under §91.715 is displayed at the cabin or cockpit entrance so that it is legible to passengers or crew. The UAS fully loaded weighs well under the proposed 551b limit and is operated without an onboard pilot. As such, there is no ability or place to carry certification and registration documents or to display them on the UAS. An equivalent level of safety will be achieved by keeping these documents at the ground control point where the pilot flying the UAS will have immediate access to them, to the extent they are applicable to the UAS.

1 4 C.F.R. §91.405 (a); 407 (a) (1); 409 (a) (2); 417(a) & (b): Maintenance Inspections. These regulations require that an aircraft operator or owner "shall have that aircraft inspected as prescribed in subpart E of this part and shall between required inspections, except as provided in paragraph (c) of this section, have discrepancies repaired as prescribed in part 43 of this chapter...," and others shall inspect or maintain the aircraft in compliance with Part 43. Given that these sections and Part 43 apply only to aircraft with an airworthiness certificate, these sections will not apply to the applicant. Maintenance will be accomplished by the operator pursuant to the flight manual and operating handbook. An equivalent level of safety will be achieved because the U AS is very limited in size and will carry a small payload and operate only in restricted areas for a limited period of time. If mechanical issues arise the UAS can land immediately and willbe operating from no higher than 400 feet AGL. The operator will e nsure that the UAS is in working order prior to initiating flight, perform required maintenance, and keep a log of any maintenance performed. Moreover, the operator is the person most familiar with the aircraft and best suited to maintain the aircraft in a n airworthy condition to provide the equivalent level of safety. An equivalent level of safety will be achieved because maintenance and inspections will be performed

in accordance with the UAS Manufacturer's User Manual. As provided in the FOM, and a link on last page, the operator will ensure that the UAS is in working order prior to initiating flight and perform required maintenance needed.

Additional Information

The applicant Benjamin R. Nevill e believes this exemption request and associated safety considerations adequately satisfy criteria provided in Section 333 of the Reform Act of 2012, providing sufficient justification for the granting of commercial operations of the applicant's UAS . I also feel its in the public’s interest on granting the exem ption, as we can educate them at the same time. And all the positive sides of the new technology and the levels of safety.

The applicant Benjamin R. Nevill e requests your respective approval of this Section 333 exemption petition request

.

Thank you for your attention in this matter. Please notify Benjamin R. Nevill e of

your actions, and or approvals. Thank you, for your interest in this request.

Sincerely,

Benjamin R. Nevill e Drone's Eye llc

.