alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

REGION IX

75 Hawthorne Street San Francisco, CA 94105



## MEMO

SUBJECT: Informal ESA Consultation for the SP I-Anderson Prevention of Significant Deterioration (PSD) Permit Project

TO: SPI-Anderson Station PSD Pe rmit Administrative Record

FROM: Shaheerah Kelly, Environmental Engineer U.S. EPA, Region 9, Air Division, Permits Office

DATE: September 24, 2013

On September 24, 2013, Shaheerah Kelly, Environmen tal Engineer for the U. S. EPA Region 9 Office, talked to Kellie Berry, Chief of the S acramento Valley Division of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS), by phone. Shaheerah Kelly generally described the proposed SPIAnderson expansion project to Ms. Berry, and EP A’s conclusion that the project will have no effect on any endangered or threatened species or any designated critic al habitat because (1) construction activities resulting from the pr oposed modification will occur on SPI-Anderson’s existing facility footprint, and (2) construction ac tivities will not occur within 100 feet of the elderberry shrubs that are in the Pacific Gas and Electric power line Right of Way. Ms. Berry agreed that this conclusion is supported by the July 9, 1999 Conservation Guidelines for the Valley Elderberry Longhorn Beetle from the USFWS, which state that “complete avoidance (i.e., no adverse effects) may be assumed when a 100-foot (or wider) buffer is established and maintained around elderberry plants containing st ems measuring 1.0 inch or greater in diameter at ground level.” Ms. Berry stated EPA is not re quired to request concurrence from the FWS for

“no effect” determinations.
# PWYF Portfolio COmpanies 

# README
Tuesday 25th 

 June, 1996. 

Donald F. Collins, Appellant, 

 against Record No. 1053-94-1 

 Claim No. 161-30-30 

Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control, et al., Appellees. 

Upon a Rehearing En Banc 

 Before Chief Judge Moon, Judges Baker, Benton, Coleman, 

Willis, Elder, Bray, Fitzpatrick and Overton 

 Karen M. Rye for appellant. 

 W. Mark Dunn, Assistant Attorney General 

 (James S. Gilmore, III, Attorney General; 

 Gregory E. Lucyk, Senior Assistant Attorney 

 General, on brief), for appellees. 

 In Collins v. Dept. of Alcoholic Beverage Control, 21 Va. 

App. 671, 467 S.E.2d 279 (1996), a majority of a panel of the Court 

affirmed the decision of the Workers' Compensation Commission. 

Collins' petition for rehearing en banc was granted and heard on June 

10, 1996. For the reasons stated in the panel's majority opinion, we 

affirm the decision of the commission, and the stay of this Court's 

February 20, 1996 mandate is lifted. 

Judge Elder concurs in the result based on imposition only. 

 Judges Benton and Fitzpatrick would reverse the decision of the 

commission for the reasons stated in the dissenting opinion of the 

original panel decision. See id. at 681-87, 467 S.E.2d at 284-87 

(Benton, J., dissenting). 
This order shall be published and certified to the Virginia 

Workers' Compensation Commission. 

 A Copy, 

 Teste: 

 Cynthia L. McCoy, Clerk 

 By: 

 

 Deputy Clerk
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 171 (Tuesday, September 4, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Page 45001]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-19112]



[[Page 45001]]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

[Disaster Declaration #15663; California Disaster Number CA-00293 
Declaration of Economic Injury]


Administrative Declaration of an Economic Injury Disaster for the 
State of California

AGENCY: U.S. Small Business Administration.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This is a notice of an Economic Injury Disaster Loan (EIDL) 
declaration for the State of California, dated 08/24/2018.
    Incident: Cranston Fire.
    Incident Period: 07/25/2018 through 08/15/2018.

DATES: Issued on 08/24/2018.
    Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date: 05/24/2019.

ADDRESS: Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business 
Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport 
Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A. Escobar, Office of Disaster 
Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street SW, 
Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416, (202) 205-6734.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that as a result of 
the Administrator's EIDL declaration, applications for economic injury 
disaster loans may be filed at the address listed above or other 
locally announced locations.
    The following areas have been determined to be adversely affected 
by the disaster:

Primary Counties: Riverside
Contiguous Counties:
    California: Imperial, Orange, San Bernardino, San Diego.
    Arizona: La Paz.

    The Interest Rates are:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                              Percent
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Businesses and Small Agricultural Cooperatives without             3.610
 Credit Available Elsewhere.............................
Non-Profit Organizations without Credit Available                  2.500
 Elsewhere..............................................
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The number assigned to this disaster for economic injury is 156630.
    The States which received an EIDL Declaration # are California, 
Arizona.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number 59008)

    Dated: August 24, 2018.
Linda E. McMahon,
Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2018-19112 Filed 8-31-18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
EXHIBIT 31.1
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302
OF SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of SurModics, Inc.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of
the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the
period covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods
presented in this report;4.
    
    I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures
(as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over
financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the
registrant and have:
     5.
    
    I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board
of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
   Dated:  December 14, 2010
    Signature:
    /s/ Philip D. AnkenyPhilip D. AnkenyChief Executive Officer, Senior Vice
President and Chief Financial Officer
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 172 (Wednesday, September 5, 2018)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 45037]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-19215]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 25

[Docket No. FAA-2018-0335; Special Conditions No. 25-725-SC]


Special Conditions: Bombardier Inc., Model BD-700-2A12 and BD-
700-2A13 Series Airplanes; Flight Envelope Protection: High Incidence 
Protection System

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Final special conditions; correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FAA is correcting an error that appeared in the Federal 
Register on May 1, 2018, for special conditions No. 25-725-SC, Docket 
No. FAA-2018-0335. As published, there was an error in the citation and 
the correct citation has been added.

DATES: Effective on Bombardier on September 5, 2018.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Joe Jacobsen, Airplane and Flight Crew 
Interface, AIR-671, Transport Standards Branch, Policy and Innovation 
Division, Aircraft Certification Service, Federal Aviation 
Administration, 2200 South 216th Street, Des Moines, Washington 98198; 
telephone and fax 206-231-3158; email <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#064c6963284c676569647563684660676728616970"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="743e1b115a3e15171b1607111a341215155a131b02">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

    On April 25, 2018, the FAA issued Special Conditions No. 25-725-SC, 
Docket No. FAA-2018-0335, which was published in the Federal Register 
on May 1, 2018 (83 FR 18934). Those special conditions pertain to the 
high incidence protection system that replaces the stall warning system 
during normal operating conditions, prohibits the airplane from 
stalling, limits the angle of attack at which the airplane can be flown 
during normal low speed operation, and cannot be overridden by the 
flight crew for Bombardier Model BD-700-2A12 and BD-700-2A13 series 
airplanes. As published, part II, paragraph 7 of the final special 
conditions cited Sec.  25.143(j)(2)(i) instead of Sec.  25.143(j)(1). 
There are no substantive changes to the document and it was apparent 
that Sec.  25.143(j)(1) should have been referenced from the beginning.

Correction

    In the final special conditions document FR Doc. 2018-09126 (Filed 
4-30-2018; 8:45 a.m.), published on May 1, 2018 (83 FR 18934), make the 
following correction:
    On page 18938, column 2, under part II, paragraph 7, correct 
``Sec.  25.143(j)(2)(i)'' to read ``Sec.  25.143(j)(1)''.

    Issued in Des Moines, Washington, on August 27, 2018.
Victor Wicklund,
Manager, Transport Standards Branch, Policy and Innovation Division, 
Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2018-19215 Filed 9-4-18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Exhibit 8



|                                    |  |                         
|----------------------------------- |  | ------------------------
|Company                             |  | Country of Incorporation
|Nokia Sales International Oy        |  | Finland                 
|Nokia Inc.                          |  | United States           
|Nokia GmbH                          |  | Germany                 
|Nokia UK Limited                    |  | England & Wales         
|Nokia TMC Limited                   |  | Republic of Korea       
|Nokia (China) Investment Co. Ltd.   |  | China                   
|Nokia Telecommunications Ltd.       |  | China                   
|Nokia Finance International B.V.    |  | The Netherlands         
|Nokia India Pvt. Ltd.               |  | India                   
|Nokia do Brasil Tecnologia Ltda     |  | Brazil                  
|OOO Nokia                           |  | Russia                  
|NAVTEQ Corporation                  |  | United States           
|NAVTEQ B.V.                         |  | The Netherlands         
|NAVTEQ Europe B.V.                  |  | The Netherlands         
|Nokia Siemens Networks B.V.         |  | The Netherlands         
|Nokia Siemens Networks Oy           |  | Finland                 
|Nokia Siemens Networks GmbH & Co KG |  | Germany                 
|Nokia Siemens Networks Pvt. Ltd.    |  | India                   
|Nokia Siemens Networks Japan Corp.  |  | Japan                   
|US Nokia Siemens Networks US LLC    |  | United States
EXHIBIT 32





CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER




PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350




Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, the undersigned officer of BioRestorative Therapies, Inc. (the “Company”) hereby certifies that the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2011 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date: August 17, 2011
/s/ Mark WeinrebMark WeinrebPrincipal Executive and Financial Officer





The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.
#### In the Matter of George Hazzard, Respondent, v John Moraitis et al., Constituting the Zoning Board of Appeals of the Village of Buchanan, Appellants.

In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination by the Zoning Board of Appeals of the Village of Buchanan, which denied the petitioner’s application for a special permit to *754convert an existing one-family structure to a two-family structure, the appeal is from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Nicolai, J.), entered April 11, 1989, which annulled the determination and granted the petition.

Ordered that the judgment is reversed, on the law, with costs, the petition is denied, and the determination is confirmed.

Subsequent to the Supreme Court’s determination granting the petitioner’s application for a special use permit, the relevant provisions of the Village zoning ordinance were amended. The ordinance now requires, *inter alia,*that one seeking a special use permit for an accessory apartment must have occupied the dwelling in question for a period of at least three years prior to the date of the application (Village of Buchanan Code § 54-2 [B]), a requirement with which the petitioner cannot establish compliance. Inasmuch as the law as it exists at the time a decision is rendered on appeal is controlling *(see, Matter of Alscot Investing Corp. v Board of Trustees,*64 NY2d 921; *Matter of Demisay, Inc. v Petito,*31 NY2d 896; *Matter of McDonald’s Corp. v Village of Elmsford,*156 AD2d 687, 688-689; 2 Anderson, New York Zoning Law and Practice § 26.23, at 409-410 [3d ed]), the Supreme Court’s judgment must be reversed, and the determination denying the special permit confirmed. Kunzeman, J. P., Hooper, Eiber and O’Brien, JJ., concur.
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended
September 30, 2012 (the Report) of Solar Senior Capital Ltd. (the Registrant), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, RICHARD PETEKA, the Chief Financial Officer of the Registrant,
hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) The information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.

|      |  |                         
|----- |  | ------------------------
|      | 
|      |  | /S/    RICHARD L.
PETEKA
|Name: |  | Richard L. Peteka       
|Date: |  | November 1, 2012
DINCA N

AVIATIO N 

## OrTh,-;:^?ORTAIiO N

February 22 , 201 0 U S Departmen t

o f Transportatio n Docke t Operation s Wes t Buildin g Groun dFloo r RoomW12-14 0 120 0 Ne w Jerse y Avenue , SE . Washington , D.C . 2059 0 .

SUBJECT : RETRACTIO N OF :

"PETITIO N FO REXEMPTIO N FRO M 1 4 CF R§25.813(e ) EMERGENC Y EXI T ACCESS " Dear Ladie s an dGentlemen : Dunca n Aviatio n hereb y retract s it s Petitio n fo r Exemptio n from1 4 CF R§25.813(e ) entitle d"Emergenc y Exi t Access " i n Dassaul t

Aviatio n Mystere-Falco n 900 an dFalco n 900E X aircraf t date dFebruar y 16 , 2010 . After discussion s with Mr . Da n Jacquet , TA D Aircraf t Certificatio n Service, ther e i s alread y guidanc e i n plac e t o allo w for th e installation o f

door s betwee n passenge r compartments . Recentl y release dSFA R10 9 paragrap h 1 0 "Interio r Doors" , woul deliminat e th e nee dfor an exemptio n from1 4 CF R§25.813(e) . Pleas e contac t

th e undersigne di f

yo u hav e an y fiirther

question s regardin g thi s retraction . Respectfiill y yours , Lyl e Schueth Certificatio n Coordinato r Dunca n Aviation , Inc . 370 1 Aviatio n Roa d Lincoln , N e 6852 4 Ph : (402 ) 479-417 4 Fax:(402)479-169 4 e-mail : lyle.schueth@duncanaviation.co m

Lincoln Airpor

t P.O . Bo x 8188 7 Lincoln , Nebrask

a 6850 1 402.475.261 1 Fa x 402.475.554 1 www.duncanaviation.con

i
EXHIBIT 23.1


                          Independent Auditors' Consent

The Board of Directors
The Great Train Store Company:

We consent to the  incorporation by reference in the registration  statements on
Form S-8 ( Nos.  33-82626 and 333-10427) of The Great Train Store Company of our
report  dated  February  4,  1997,  except as to note 3 which is as of March 19,
1997,  relating  to the  consolidated  balance  sheet of The Great  Train  Store
Company and  subsidiaries  as of December 28, 1996 and the related  consolidated
statements  of  operations,  stockholders'  equity  and cash flows for the years
ended  December  30, 1995 and December  28,  1996,  which report  appears in the
December 28, 1996 annual report on Form 10-KSB of The Great Train Store Company.


                                     /s/ KPMG Peat Marwick LLP

Dallas, Texas
March 21, 1997
# Comments and Responses
NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAI I REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER

NO. CAAP-22-0000388

IN THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS

OF THE STATE OF HAWAI I

IN THE MATTER OF THE RESIDUARY TRUST CREATED UNDER THE

BETTY C. LEU REVOCABLE TRUST DATED MAY 25, 2006, AS AMENDED

APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIRST CIRCUIT

(TRUST NO. 1CTR-22-0000012)

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO DISMISS APPEAL

(By: Leonard, Presiding Judge, McCullen and Chan, JJ.)

Upon consideration of Respondent-Appellant Lester K.M.

Leu's March 3, 2023 Motion to Dismiss Appeal, the papers in

support, and the record,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the motion is granted and the

appeal is dismissed, under Hawai i Rules of Appellate Procedure

Rule 42(b). The parties shall bear their own attorneys' fees and

costs on appeal.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai i, March 9, 2023.

/s/ Katherine G. Leonard

Presiding Judge

/s/ Sonja M.P. McCullen

Associate Judge

/s/ Derrick H.M. Chan

Associate Judge

Electronically Filed

Intermediate Court of Appeals

CAAP-22-0000388

09-MAR-2023

07:54 AM

Dkt. 86 OGMD
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3982 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 3982

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                 May 25 (legislative day, May 16), 1994

 Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and 
                              Public Works

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To amend the Marine Protection, Research, and Sanctuaries Act of 1972 
          to prohibit the ocean dumping of radioactive waste.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Ocean Radioactive Dumping Ban Act of 
1994''.

SEC. 2. AMENDMENTS TO THE OCEAN DUMPING ACT.

    The Marine Protection, Research, and Sanctuaries Act of 1972 (33 
U.S.C. 1401 et seq.) is amended--
            (1) in section 3 (33 U.S.C. 1402), by--
                    (A) striking paragraph (j); and
                    (B) redesignating the following paragraphs 
                accordingly;
            (2) by altering any reference to the paragraphs 
        redesignated under paragraph (1) of this Act;
            (3) in section 102(a) (33 U.S.C. 1412(a)), by striking 
        ``high-level'' before ``radioactive waste''; and
            (4) in section 104 (33 U.S.C. 1414), by striking subsection 
        (i).

SEC. 3. CLARIFICATION.

    Nothing in this Act shall affect the transportation of material 
containing de minimis levels of radioactivity for the purpose of 
dumping it into ocean waters under the Marine Protection, Research, and 
Sanctuaries Act of 1972.

            Passed the House of Representatives May 23, 1994.

            Attest:

                                           DONNALD K. ANDERSON,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
XRX-12.31.13-Ex10.e.17


EXHIBIT 10(e)(17) 


Annual Performance Incentive Plan for 2013 (“2013 APIP”) 


Under the 2013 APIP, executive officers of the Company are eligible to receive performance related cash payments. Payments are, in general, only made if performance objectives established by the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors (the “Committee”) are met. 


The Committee previously approved an incentive target opportunity for 2013, expressed as a percentage of base salary, for each participating officer. The Committee also established overall threshold, target and maximum performance metrics for the 2013 APIP. Certain additional goals were established for some officers based on business unit measures.  Additionally, the Committee had established an opportunity for an individual performance component whereby the Committee has the authority to increase or decrease the award by up to 20%, subject to the limitations of Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code. The performance measures and weightings were adjusted earnings per share (weighted at 40%), operating cash flow (weighted at 40%) and revenue growth (adjusted to exclude the impact of changes in the translation of foreign currencies into U.S. dollars) (weighted at 20%).


The performance against the 2013 APIP goals was as follows: adjusted earnings per share was between threshold and target, operating cash flow was between target and maximum, and constant currency revenue growth was below threshold.  





1