alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 22-0465

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

MICHAEL LEE MARFUTA, JR.,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, 

and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including May 30, 2023, within which to prepare, file, 

and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

April 19 2023

04/19/2023

Case Number: DA 22-0465
**EXHIBIT 23.2**

 

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form S-8, No. 333-44044) pertaining to the Pemstar Inc. 1994Stock Option Plan, Pemstar Inc. 1995 Stock Option Plan, Pemstar Inc. 1997 Stock Option Plan, Pemstar Inc. 1999 Amended and Restated Stock Option Plan, Pemstar Inc. 2000 Stock Option Plan and 2000 Employee Stock Purchase Plan, the RegistrationStatement (Form S-3, No. 333-75284) pertaining to Common Stock, Preferred Stock, Debt Securities, Depository Shares, Securities Warrants and Units, the Registration Statement (Form S-8, No. 333-97517) pertaining to the Pemstar Inc. 2000 EmployeeStock Purchase Plan and Pemstar Inc. 2002 Stock Option Plan, the Registration Statement (Form S-3, No. 333-97511) pertaining to Common Stock and the Registration Statement (Form S-8, No. 333-112974) pertaining to the Pemstar Inc. 2002 Employee StockPurchase Plan of our report dated May 7, 2004, with respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedules of Pemstar Inc. included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended March 31, 2005. 

 

                                    /s/ Ernst & YoungLLP 

 

Minneapolis, Minnesota 

June 13, 2005
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Science Foundation

The National Science Board, pursuant to NSF regulations (45 CFR part 614), the National Science Foundation Act, as amended, (42 U.S.C. 1862n-5), and the Government in the Sunshine Act (5 U.S.C. 552b), hereby gives notice of a revision to an announcement of meetings for the transaction of National Science Board business.

# FEDERAL REGISTER CITATION OF PREVIOUS ANNOUNCEMENT:

83 FR 43710, published on August 27, 2018.

# PREVIOUSLY ANNOUNCED TIME AND DATE OF MEETING:

Thursday, August 30, 2018 from 3:00 p.m. to 4:00 p.m.

# CHANGE IN THE MEETING:

This meeting of the National Science Board has been postponed. Notice of the new time and place will be provided when it is rescheduled.

# CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION:

                        Brad Gutierrez,                         *bgutierr@nsf.gov,*                         703/292-7000. Please refer to the National Science Board website for additional information. Meeting information and schedule updates (time, place, subject matter, and status of meeting) may be found at                         *http://www.nsf.gov/​nsb/​meetings/​notices.jsp#sunshine.*

Ann Bushmiller,

Senior Counsel to the National Science Board.

[FR Doc. 2018-19123 Filed 8-29-18; 4:15 pm]

 BILLING CODE 7555-01-P
<PAGE>
                                                                EXHIBIT 23.1

INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

     We consent to the use in this Amendment No. 3 to the Registration
Statement No. 333-40500 of Elastic Networks Inc. of our report dated June 16,
2000 (August 4, 2000 as to Note 15 and August 25, 2000 as to Note 17 (which
expresses an unqualified opinion and includes an explanatory paragraph
relating to the restatement described in Note 17)), appearing in the
Prospectus, which is part of such Registration Statement, and to the
reference to us under the headings "Selected Historical Financial
Information" and "Experts" in such Prospectus.

/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP


Atlanta, Georgia
September 25, 2000
Order entered April 15, 2020 

In The 

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-19-01190-CV 

JAMES MCCOLLUM AND FRANK D. MCCOLLUM, III, Appellants 

V. 

U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATIONS LEGAL TITLE TRUSTEE 

FOR TRUMAN 2016 SC6 TITLE TRUST, Appellee 

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 3 

Dallas County, Texas 

Trial Court Cause No. CC-19-03726-C 

ORDER 

Before the Court are the motions of appellant Frank D. McCollum, III for 

emergency relief to suspend enforcement of the trial court’s judgment and for an 

extension of time to file his brief on the merits. By opinion dated with today’s 

date, the Court dismissed this appeal for want of jurisdiction. Accordingly, we 

DENY the motions as moot. 

/s/ ROBERT D. BURNS, III 

 CHIEF JUSTICE
Rebecca McPherson 

Office of General Counsel 

Regulation & Enforcement Div. 

800 Independence Ave SW 

Room 915A 

Washington, D.C. 20591 

I just reading an article in one of the magazines I subscribe to about 

the Air France Air Bus crash that left Brazil and was headed to France about 

2 years ago. Killing all the people on board. 

One of the items that I found interesting and would like the FAA to 

look into is that although the Air Bus is a state-of-the-art aircraft, I think it 

has one fatal flaw. The competition, BOEING, does not have this flaw. 

Apparently from everything the investigators were able get from the 

BLACK BOX, RED BOX and whatever else they had to look at. It was 

determined that the Co-Pilot [sitting in the RH seat] had is right hand 

pulling back on his JOY Stick the whole time. 

Apparently there is no feedback circuit on any Air Bus plane to alert 

the Pilot or Co-Pilot when someone else is trying to make a control move. All 

Boeing Aircraft have this redundant feature. 

Although I do not like regulation, this is one area I would like to see 

the US Government step in. I don't fly as much as I used to, but I still do 

travel and I am now concerned for my safety. 

The proposal I would like to see implemented immediately would be 

that all commercial passenger carrying aircraft within US Airspace have 

direct feedback for flight controls between Pilot and Co-Pilot. 

This might put Air Bus on notice that they have an unsafe product and 

also give the US Company BOEING an advantage. 

:fred :Jferscfie{man 

3760 'Wtnrfina Pine Vr. x. 

:M.etamora, :MI 48455 

Tritz~z6o@tir.com
IIA

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 4122

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

MARCH 24 (legislative day, FEBRUARY 22), 1994

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science,

and Transportation

AN ACT

To temporarily extend certain provisions of the Marine

Mammal Protection Act.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That section 114(a)(1) of the Marine Mammal Protection

4 Act of 1972 (16 U.S.C. 1383a(a)(1)), is amended by strik5 ing ‘‘April 1, 1994,’’ and inserting in lieu thereof ‘‘May

6 1, 1994,’’.

Passed the House of Representatives March 24,

1994.

Attest: DONNALD K. ANDERSON,

Clerk.
James E. Krieger 

1 b L' 8· ,... -

1

. 2.744 Moraine Valley Road I ,\ <J 

Wauconda, Illinois 60084 

jkrieger@worldwide aviation.solutions 

Jkrieger@highaboveaerials.com 

Via Electronic Submission and Certified U.S. Mail 

Docket Operations 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

West Building, Ground Floor 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. 

Washington, D.C. 20590 

December 10, 2015 

Re: Application for Exemption from Specified Aviation Regulations Under 

Section 333 of the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012. 

Applicant: 

Dear Madam or Sir, 

Worldwide Aviatio~ Solutions LLC , dba High Above 

Aerial Imaging 

Attn: James Krieger 

2744 Moraine Valley Road 

Wauconda, Illinois 60084 

Phone: 847-565-0215 

Email: jkrieger@worldwideaviation.solutions 

Please accept this letter as a supplement to the exemption request submitted by 

Worldwide Aviation Solutions LLC (the" Applicant"). The Applicant's exemption request 

is currently pending under Docket Number FAA-20 15-6896-0001. 

Worldwide Aviation Solutions ILC hereby requests that the exemption so granted be 

amended to include: 

I) A DJI Inspire 1 Pro X5 small unmanned aircraft system (sUAS). Relevant facts and 

reasoning are: 

The DJI Inspire 1 Pro X5 is part of DJI Innovation's family of mission-proven multi-rotor 

sUAS. This sUAS uses essentially the same flight control and RC transmitter category 

and is built with similar components to the aircraft specified in the original exemption 

request. The DJI Inspire 1 Pro X5 is slightly larger than the DJI Phantom 2 Vision but 

weighs far less than the 55 pound maximum. This sUAS employs the DJI Inspire 1 
airframe and an updated Zenmuse X5 camera. Complete specifications for this sUAS are 

contained in Appendix 1. 

The findings, rationale and conclusions contained in the original exemption request apply 

without modification to this application to include the DJI Inspire fro X5 in it. 

2) Mter receiving a proper FAA exemption, Worldwide Aviation Solutions LLC intends 

to do business as (dba) High Above Aerial Imaging. Please amend our request 

accordingly. 

Thank you for your consideration of these important requests. Please advise us Qf any 

additional information that may be required. 

ger 

·arion Solutions LLC 

\ . 

' 
·Appendix I
SILVERBERG 

GOLDMAN& 

B IKO FF, t.t.P. 

ATTORNEYS AT LAW 

GEORGETOWN PLAcE • SuiTE !20 • llOl 30TH STREET, NW • WASHINGTON, D.C. 20007 

VOICE (202) 944-JJQQ • fACSIMILE (202) 944-3306 

November 12, 2014 

VIA ELECTRONIC SUBMISSION 

Mr. Robert Finamore 

Chief, Foreign Air Carrier Licensing Division 

Office of International Aviation 

Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Ave., S.E. 

Washington, D.C. 20590 

Re: Notice of Additional Codesharing 

and Request for Waiver 

Docket DOT-OST-2011-0210 

Dear Mr. Finamore: 

Counsel for AEROLANE, Lineas Aereas Nacionales del Ecuador S.A. d/b/a LAN 

Ecuador ("LAN Ecuador") has polled each of the carriers served with the Notice of Additional 

Codesharing and Request for Waiver ("Notice") filed jointly by American Airlines, Inc. 

("American") and LAN Ecuador in the above-referenced Docket on November 7, 2014. The 

undersigned counsel hereby reports to the Department that the request for waiver of the 30-day 

advance notice requirement for additional codeshare services contained in the Notice is 

unopposed. 

Accordingly, the undersigned counsel for LAN Ecuador hereby respectfully requests that 

the Department act promptly on the waiver request so that LAN Ecuador and American can 

implement the new codeshare services described in the Notice as soon as possible. 

cc: Mr. Brett Kruger 

Howard Kass, Esq. 

Robert A. Wirick, Esq. 

Respectfully submitted, 

SILVERBERG, GOLDMAN & BIKOFF, L.L.P. 

Attorneys for 

LA~OR /l / #> 

By kd-1 ;!u_ {_ 

Robert P. Silverberg ) 

All parties on attached Service List 
J onathan.linde@united.com 

Steve.Morrissey@united.corn 

Dan. weiss@united.corn 

grnurphy@crowell.corn 

sascha.vanderbellen@delta.com 

chris. walker@delta.corn 

nssparks@fedex.com 

anbird@fedex.corn 

sllunsford@fedex.com 

gbleopard@fedex.corn 

cefelts@fedex.com 

Service List 

rnsinick@ssd.com 

anita.mosner@hklaw.corn 

Jennifer.Nowak@hklaw.corn 

rpommer@atlasair.com 

jrichardson@j ohnlrichardson.corn 

jcanny@amerijet.corn 

john@mietuslaw.corn 

John.s.dtmcan@faa.gov 

cristinaSA@state. gov
DPS-EXP10.33_12.31.13


Exhibit 10.33






AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT
This AMENDMENT (the “Amendment”) by and between DPS Holdings Inc. (the “Company”), and Derry Hobson (the “Executive”), effective as of February 11, 2009, is an amendment to that certain Employment Agreement by and between the Company and the Executive dated as of October 15, 2007 (the “Employment Agreement”).
RECITALS
The Company and the Executive have previously entered into the Employment Agreement to provide for terms and conditions of the Executive’s employment by the Company; and
The Company and the Executive desire to modify the Employment Agreement to provide for certain payments to the Executive in the event that the executive is terminated without cause or for good reason within two years after the occurrence of a change in control.
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY AGREED AS FOLLOWS:
1.An Appendix A is added to the Employment Agreement to read as follows:
“APPENDIX A
Notwithstanding anything in this Agreement to the contrary, if (i) a Change in Control (as defined in the Dr Pepper Snapple Group, Inc. Change in Control Severance Plan (the ‘Severance Plan’)) occurs and (ii) the Executive is terminated without Cause or for Good Reason (in each case as defined in the Severance Plan) within the two year period following the occurrence of a Change in Control, the Executive shall be entitled to additional benefits equal to those that would have payable or provided under the Severance Plan had he been a participant in such plan but only to the extent an element of benefits provided under the Severance Plan exceeds the analogous amount payable or provided for the same element under the Agreement.  Any benefits payable or provided pursuant to the Agreement shall be paid in the same time and form as specified in the Agreement.  Any additional amounts payable or provided under the Severance Plan will be payable or provided as set forth in the Severance Plan.”

1






IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Executive has hereunto set his hand and, pursuant to the authorization from its Board of Directors, the Company has caused these presents to be executed in its name on its behalf on this 18th day of Febraury, but effective as of the day and year first above written.


                                             	
							
	 
	 
	 
	DPS HOLDINGS INC.

	 

	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 

	 
	 
	 
	By:
	/s/ Larry Solomon
	 

	 
	 
	 
	Name:
	Larry Solomon
	 

	 
	 
	 
	Title:
	Executive Vice President
	 

	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 

	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 

	 
	 
	EXECUTIVE

	 

	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 

	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 

	 
	 
	 
	/s/ Derry Hobson


	 
	 

	 
	 
	 
	Derry Hobson
	 







2
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4095 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4095

 To repeal the Medicare and Medicaid Coverage Data Bank, and for other 
                               purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 21, 1994

 Mrs. Fowler introduced the following bill; which was referred jointly 
      to the Committees on Ways and Means and Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To repeal the Medicare and Medicaid Coverage Data Bank, and for other 
                               purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REPEAL OF MEDICARE AND MEDICAID COVERAGE DATA BANK.

    (a) In General.--Effective January 1, 1994, section 13581 of the 
Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1993 is hereby repealed, and any 
provision of law amended by such section is restored, and shall be 
applied and administered, as if such section had not been enacted into 
law.
    (b) Study and Report.--
            (1) Study.--The Secretary of Health and Human Services 
        shall conduct a study on how to achieve the objectives of the 
        Medicare and Medicaid Coverage Data Bank described in section 
        1144 of the Social Security Act (as in effect on the day before 
        the date of the enactment of this Act) in the most cost-
        effective manner, taking into account--
                    (A) the administrative burden of such Data Bank on 
                private sector entities and governments,
                    (B) the possible duplicative reporting requirements 
                of the Health Care Financing Administration in effect 
                on such date of enactment, and
                    (C) the legal ability of such entities and 
                governments to acquire the required information.
            (2) Report.--The Secretary shall report to Congress on the 
        results of the study described in paragraph (1) by not later 
        than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act.

                                 <all>
```
<SEQUENCE>2
[DESCRIPTION]TRUST DATA


                                                                    EXHIBIT 99


                            Supplementary Trust Data




l.  The total amount of cash distributed to
      Certificateholders in l997, per $l,000
      of Certificates..................................................$149.306


2.  The total amount of the distribution set
      forth in paragraph l which represents
      principal payments on the Certificates ...........................$91.146


3.  The amount of outstanding balances in the
      Accounts which were 30 or more days
      delinquent as of the end of the
      December l997 Monthly Period .............................$422,047,932.57


4.  The total amount of the Monthly
      Servicing Fee paid to the Servicer
      by the Trust in l997......................................$151,096,368.38


                                       38
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)

In connection with this Report on Form 10-Q for the three and nine
months ended June 30, 2016, or the Report, of PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd., or the Registrant, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Aviv Efrat, Chief Financial Officer of the Registrant, hereby
certify, to the best of my knowledge, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.



|               |  |                        
|-------------- |  | -----------------------
|/s/ Aviv Efrat
|Name:          |  | Aviv Efrat             
|Title:         |  | Chief Financial Officer
|Date:          |  | August 9, 2016
Docket Index for

EPA

- R09

- OAR

- 2015

- 0280



## Section C :

Current BAAQMD State

Implementation Plan Rules
**
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

**PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)**

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2017 (the “Report”) of Solar Senior Capital Ltd. (the “Registrant”), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I,MICHAEL S. GROSS, the Chief Executive Officer of the Registrant, hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge, that: 

(1) The Reportfully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and 

(2) Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant. 

 
 
/s/    MICHAEL S. GROSS
**Name:** **Michael S. Gross****Date:** **November 2, 2017****
NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
STELLA ANJENKENG FONKENG , Petitioner,
v. ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General , Respondent. No. 10-71425 Agency No. A097-854-014
MEMORANDUM *

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals Argued and Submitted March 7, 2014 Pasadena, California Before: KOZINSKI , Chief Judge, GRABER , Circuit Judge, and BREYER , Senior District Judge. **
1. The BIA properly dismissed Petitione r Stella Fonkeng’s appeal from the IJ’s decision denying her asylum and withholding of removal on the basis of an 

# FILED
MAR 27 2014 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. ** The Honorable Charles R. Breyer, Senior District Judge for the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, sitting by designation.page 2 adverse credibility determination. See Jie Cui v. Holder , 712 F.3d 1332, 1338 (9th Cir. 2013). The IJ and BIA found that F onkeng lacked credibility, not because she lied about her visa and means of travel, but because the inconsistencies directly related to her motive for coming to the U.S. Singh v. Gonzales , 439 F.3d 1100, 1108 (9th Cir. 2006).
2. Neither the IJ nor the BIA failed to analyze separately Fonkeng’s Convention Against Torture claim. Farah v. Ashcroft , 348 F.3d 1153, 1156–57 (9th Cir. 2003). The IJ and BIA reviewed the extrinsic evidence of alleged past torture against Fonkeng, including the country reports and photographs of Fonkeng’s scars. They properly concl uded that the evidence didn’t “suffice to demonstrate that she is more likely than not to be tortured if returned to Cameroon.”
PETITION DENIED.