alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA

Department of Environmental Protection

August 10, 2012

717

- 787

- 9483

SUBJECT: Source Test Review

Caterpillar Inc.

Springettsbury Township, York County

TO: Ranjan Roy

Air Pollution Control Engineer

Southcentral Regional Office

FROM: Bryon Richwine

Air Pollution Control Engineer

Source Testing Section

Division of Source Testing and Monitoring

THROUGH: L. Blaine DeHaven

Chief

Division of Source Testing and Monitoring

Timothy R. Brooks

Chi ef

Source Testing Section

Division of Source Testing and Monitoring

Caterpillar Inc. operates two identical hard chromium electroplating lines designated as the north

and south lines. Each line consists of a pretreatment operation, which is vented to a packed

- bed

scrubber (not tested at this time), and a chrome electroplating operation, which is vented to a

composite mesh pad scrubber system. Each line contains two plating tanks each with four

rectifiers. Each rectifier has a capacity of 4000 amps; t hus, each line has a maximum potential

rectifier capacity of 32,000. Emissions for each line are vented from their composite mesh pad

scrubber system through separate 35 inch I.D. stacks to the atmosphere.

ETS, Inc. conducted stack tests on both the nor th and south hard chromium electroplating line

exhaust stacks which serve the mesh pad scrubber system. Testing was conducted on August 21,

1996 for total chromium (EPA method 306). The test runs were conducted in accordance withCaterpillar, Inc.

- 2

- August 10, 2012

the preapproved test pro tocol and seem to be representative of the actual emissions at the

operating conditions at the time of testing.

The following information was extracted from the test report:

Total Chromium Emissions Summary(North Line):

Run No. 1 2 3

Test Date 8/21/96 8/21/96 8/21/96

Flowrate [dscfm] 14,896 14,716 14,285

Emission Rate [lb./hr] 6.85E

- 06 4.07E

- 06 8.97E

- 06

Concentration [ μ g/dscm] 0.123 0.074 0.168

Isokinetic Rate [%] 106.3 104.3 104.9

Total Chromium Emissions Summary(South Line):

Run No. 1 2 3

Tes t Date 8/21/96 8/21/96 8/21/96

Flowrate [dscfm] 15,031 15,147 15,286

Emission Rate [lb./hr] 3.59E

- 05 1.52E

- 05 2.17E

- 05

Concentration [ μ g/dscm] 0.638 0.268 0.379

Isokinetic Rate [%] 102.7 99.8 101.7

cc: Permit File 67

- 323

- 033

Technical Support Sec tion

- Krish Ramamurthy

Compliance and Enforcement

- Scott Kepner

EPA/TRB

Data File

- Stack Testing

Reading File, Source Testing Section

LBD:TRB:BR:br
QI'M #

AlR-ANM-030-F7

Date: 01113/2009

Title: Domestic New Action Worksheet with 58

Record of Contacts

DMS Docket No. FAA-200.5.-- 122lS

With whom outside the FAA has this proposal been discllssed (e.g., ATA, RAA, ALPA, etc.)?

Revision

Page 6 of 7

Organi7.Jltiun Person Contacted Date

Lockheed Martin (OEM) Geofr Blllem:tn August 2008

UNCONTROLLED COpy WHEN DOWNLOADED

Check the Master List to Verify Thai This is the Correct Revision Before Use
I

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 3811

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow the casualty loss

deduction for disaster losses without regard to the 10-percent adjusted

gross income floor.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

FEBRUARY 8, 1994

Mr. BERMAN (for himself, Mr. MCKEON, Mr. BEILENSON, Mr. GALLEGLY,

Mr. WAXMAN, Mr. MOORHEAD, Mr. MATSUI, and Mr. DIXON) introduced

the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and

Means

A BILL

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow the

casualty loss deduction for disaster losses without regard

to the 10-percent adjusted gross income floor.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. ELIMINATION OF 10-PERCENT FLOOR FOR DIS4 ASTER LOSSES.

5 (a) GENERAL RULE.—Subparagraph (A) of section

6 165(h)(2) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating

7 to net casualty loss allowed only to the extent it exceeds
2

•HR 3811 IH

1 10 percent of adjusted gross income) is amended by strik2 ing clauses (i) and (ii) and inserting the following:

3 ‘‘(i) the amount of the personal

4 casualty gains for the taxable year,

5 ‘‘(ii) the amount of the federally

6 declared disaster losses for the taxable

7 year (or, if lesser, the net casualty

8 loss), plus

9 ‘‘(iii) the portion of the net cas10 ualty loss which is not deductible

11 under clause (ii) but only to the ex12 tent such portion exceeds 10 percent

13 of the adjusted gross income of the in14 dividual.

15 For purposes of the preceding sentence the

16 term ‘net casualty loss’ means the excess of

17 personal casualty losses for the taxable year

18 over personal casualty gains.’’

19 (b) FEDERALLY DECLARED DISASTER LOSS DE20 FINED.—Paragraph (3) of section 165(h) of such Code is

21 amended by adding at the end the following new subpara22 graph:

23 ‘‘(C) FEDERALLY DECLARED DISASTER

24 LOSS.—The term ‘federally declared disaster

25 loss’ means any personal casualty loss attrib-
3

•HR 3811 IH

1 utable to a disaster occurring in an area subse2 quently determined by the President of the

3 United States to warrant assistance by the Fed4 eral Government under the Disaster Relief and

5 Emergency Assistance Act.’’

6 (c) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The heading for para7 graph (2) of section 165(h) of such Code is amended by

8 striking ‘‘NET CASUALTY LOSS’’ and inserting ‘‘NET

9 NONDISASTER CASUALTY LOSS’’.

10 (d) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by

11 this section shall apply to losses attributable to disasters

12 occurring on or after January 17, 1994, including for pur13 poses of determining the portion of such losses allowable

14 in taxable years ending before such date pursuant to an

15 election under section 165(i) of the Internal Revenue Code

16 of 1986.

Æ
EXHIBIT 23


               Consent of Independent Certified Public Accountants

     We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration  Statement
(Form S-3 No.  333-5035)  of  Technical  Chemicals & Products,  Inc.  and in the
related  Prospectus of our report dated  February 19, 1997,  with respect to the
consolidated   financial  statements  and  schedule  of  Technical  Chemicals  &
Products,  Inc.  included in this Annual  Report  (Form 10-K) for the year ended
December 31, 1996.


                                         /s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP

Miami, Florida
March 24, 1997





                                       62
Exhibit 8

Continuing Nokia Group Companies



|                                                                  |  |                         
|----------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ------------------------
|Company                                                           |  | Country of Incorporation
|                                                                  | 
|Nokia Solutions and Networks B.V.                                 |  | The Netherlands         
|Nokia Solutions and Networks Oy                                   |  | Finland                 
|Nokia Solutions and Networks US LLC                               |  | United States           
|Nokia Solutions and Networks Japan Corp                           |  | Japan                   
|Nokia Solutions and Networks India Private Limited                |  | India                   
|Nokia Solutions and Networks System Technology (Beijing) Co., Ltd |  | China                   
|Nokia Solutions and Networks Branch Operations Oy                 |  | Finland                 
|Nokia Solutions and Networks Korea Ltd                            |  | South Korea             
|Nokia Solutions and Networks do Brasil Telecomunicações Ltda      |  | Brazil                  
|Nokia Solutions and Networks Technology Service Co., Ltd          |  | China                   
|HERE Holding Corporation                                          |  | United States           
|HERE Global B.V.                                                  |  | The Netherlands         
|HERE Europe B.V.                                                  |  | The Netherlands         
|HERE North America LLC                                            |  | United States           
|HERE Deutschland GmbH                                             |  | Germany                 
|Nokia Finance International B.V.                                  |  | The Netherlands         

Discontinued Nokia Group Companies



|                                   |  |                         
|---------------------------------- |  | ------------------------
|Company                            |  | Country of Incorporation
|                                   | 
|Nokia Sales International Oy       |  | Finland                 
|Nokia India Pvt. Ltd.              |  | India                   
|OOO Nokia                          |  | Russia                  
|Nokia (China) Investment Co., Ltd. |  | China                   
|Nokia Telecommunications Ltd.      |  | China                   
|Nokia Inc.                         |  | United States           
|Nokia UK Limited                   |  | United Kingdom          
|Nokia do Brasil Technologia Ltda   |  | Brazil                  
|Nokia TMC Limited                  |  | South Korea             
|Nokia (Thailand) Ltd.              |  | Thailand
**EXHIBIT 32**

 

May 10, 2016

 

Via EDGAR

 

Securities and Exchange Commission

Judiciary Plaza

450 Fifth Street, N.W.

Washington, D.C. 20549

 

Re:                             Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

 

Ladies and Gentlemen:

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of VOC Energy Trust (the “Trust”) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2016 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, not in its individual capacity but solely as the trustee of the Trust, certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to its knowledge:

 

(1)                                 The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

(2)                                 The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Trust.

 

The above certification is furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350) and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.

 
|     | The   Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A. |
|----------|---------------------------------------------------|
|     | Trustee   for VOC Energy Trust                    |
|     |                                              |   |
|     | By:                                               | /s/   MICHAEL J. ULRICH |
|     |                                              | Michael   J. Ulrich |
| * * | * *                                          | *Vice President and Trust Officer* |

 

1

----
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 172 (Wednesday, September 5, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Page 45129]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-19155]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Formations of, Acquisitions by, and Mergers of Bank Holding 
Companies

    The companies listed in this notice have applied to the Board for 
approval, pursuant to the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 (12 U.S.C. 
1841 et seq.) (BHC Act), Regulation Y (12 CFR part 225), and all other 
applicable statutes and regulations to become a bank holding company 
and/or to acquire the assets or the ownership of, control of, or the 
power to vote shares of a bank or bank holding company and all of the 
banks and nonbanking companies owned by the bank holding company, 
including the companies listed below.
    The applications listed below, as well as other related filings 
required by the Board, are available for immediate inspection at the 
Federal Reserve Bank indicated. The applications will also be available 
for inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested 
persons may express their views in writing on the standards enumerated 
in the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1842(c)). If the proposal also involves the 
acquisition of a nonbanking company, the review also includes whether 
the acquisition of the nonbanking company complies with the standards 
in section 4 of the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1843). Unless otherwise noted, 
nonbanking activities will be conducted throughout the United States.
    Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding each of these 
applications must be received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the 
offices of the Board of Governors not later than September 28, 2018.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis (Mark A. Rauzi, Vice 
President), 90 Hennepin Avenue, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55480-0291:
    1. GNI LLC, New York, New York; to become a bank holding company by 
acquiring 100 percent of the voting shares of Wall Street Holding 
Company, Hamilton, North Dakota, and thereby acquire of Bank of 
Hamilton, Hamilton, North Dakota.
    B. Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco (Gerald C. Tsai, Director, 
Applications and Enforcement) 101 Market Street, San Francisco, 
California 94105-1579:
    1. BayCom Corp, Walnut Creek, California; to merge with Bethlehem 
Financial Corporation, and thereby acquire My Bank, both of Belen, New 
Mexico.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, August 29, 
2018.
Ann Misback,
Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 2018-19155 Filed 9-4-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE P
Order filed, August 17, 2016

.

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________ NO. 14

- 16

- 00515

- CR

____________ HENRY LEE BETHUNE , Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

On Appeal from the 232nd District Court

Harris County, Texas Tria l Court Cause No. 511361



### ORDER
The reporter’s record in this case was due July 26, 2016

. See Tex. R. App. P. 35.1. The court has not received a request to extend time for filing the record.
The record has not been filed with the court. Because the r eporter’s record has not been filed timely, we issue the following order.

We order Arlene Webb , the official court reporter, to file the record in this appeal within 30 days of the date of this order

. PER CURIAM
Exhibit 32.01

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the annual report on Form 10-K of Intrado Inc. (the "Company") for the period ended December 31, 2003, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned, George K. Heinrichs, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:



| |  | /s/GEORGE K. HEINRICHSGeorge K. Heinrichs President and Chief Executive
Officer
(principal executive officer)
| |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dated:
March 1, 2004

---

QuickLinks
EXHIBIT 32.2

                           CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL
                          FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT BY
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with this third amendment to the Annual Report of BMB
Munai, Inc,, on Form 10-KSB/A-3 for the period ended March 31, 2004, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
the undersigned, Sanat Kasymov, Principal Financial Officer of the Company,
certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13
                  (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and result of
                  operations of the Company.


Date: June 16, 2006                                   /s/ Sanat Kasymov
                                                     ---------------------------
                                                     Sanat Kasymov,
                                                     Principal Financial Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3934 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 3934

To amend title 28, United States Code, to provide that district courts 
   give notice of default judgments to the parties against whom such 
                         judgments are entered.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 1, 1994

  Mr. Swett introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend title 28, United States Code, to provide that district courts 
   give notice of default judgments to the parties against whom such 
                         judgments are entered.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
That chapter 125 of title 28, United States Code, is amended--
            (1) by adding at the end the following:
``Sec. 1965. Notice of entry of default judgment
    ``A district court, upon the entry of a default judgment, shall 
give notice to the party against whom such judgment is entered.''; and
            (2) in the table of sections at the beginning, by adding at 
        the end the following new item:

``1965. Notice of entry of default judgment.''.

                                 <all>
```
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 21.1

SUBSIDIARIES OF PEMSTAR INC.

Subsidiary                           Country of Incorporation
---------------------------------    ------------------------

Turtle Mountain Corporation          United States

Pemstar Luxembourg S.a.r.l.          Luxembourg

Pemstar Singapore Pte Ltd            Singapore

Pemstar Netherlands Holding B.V.     The Netherlands

Pemstar BV                           The Netherlands

Pemstar Thailand Limited             Thailand

Pemstar (Tianjin) Enterprise Ltd.    China

Pemstar de Mexico, SA de CV          Mexico

Pemstar Ireland Ltd.                 Ireland

Pemstar Brasil Ltda.                 Brazil

Pemstar Japan KK                     Japan

Pemstar Israel Ltd.                  Israel

Gentlelife Instruments Inc.          United States
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

NATIONAL VEHICLE AND FUEL EMISSIONS LABORATORY

2565 PLYMOUTH ROAD

ANN ARBOR, MICHIGAN 48105-2498

 

MEMORANDUM

SUBJECT: Heavy-Duty Hybrid Onboard Diagnostics

FROM: Amy Kopin

TO: The Docket

DATE: July 21, 2011

On June 8th, 2011 we held a conference call with BAE to discuss concerns raised by

BAE regarding heavy-duty onboard diagnostic (OBD) requirements and timing. Specifically, 

they have requested a delay of the application of HD OBD requirements for hybrid applications 

until 2020. Concerns were raised during the comment period for the heavy-duty greenhouse gas 

notice of proposed rulemaking that heavy-duty hybrid applications may not be able to meet the 

2013 heavy-duty OBD regulations that were published in the 2009 OBD Final Rulemaking.

1,2

 

Attendees from the EPA included Cleophas Jackson, Anthony Neam, and Amy Kopin. Tom 

Apalenek attended from BAE.

 

1 U.S. EPA, NHTSA, and DOT, “Greenhouse Gas Emission Standards and Fuel Efficiency Standards for Mediumand Heavy-Duty Engines and Vehicles,” republished December 29, 2010. Available here: 

http://origin.www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-2010-12-29/html/2010-32726.htm

2 U.S. EPA, “Control of Air Pollution from New Motor Vehicles and New Motor Vehicles Engines; Final Rule 

Regulations Requiring Onboard Diagnostic Systems on 2010 and Later Heavy-Duty Engines Used in Highway 

Applications Over 14,000 Pounds; Revisions to Onboard Diagnostic Requirements for Diesel Highway Heavy-Duty 

Vehicles Under 14,000 Pounds,” published February 24, 2009. Available here: 

http://www.epa.gov/otaq/regs/im/obd/regtech/hd-obd-frm-02-24-09-notice-74-fr-8310.pdf

OFFICE OF

AIR AND RADIATION
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 169 (Thursday, August 30, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Page 44312]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-18791]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE


Product Change--Priority Mail and First-Class Package Service 
Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal Service<SUP>TM</SUP>.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Date of required notice: August 30, 2018.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Elizabeth Reed, 202-268-3179.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
August 24, 2018, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a USPS 
Request to Add Priority Mail & First-Class Package Service Contract 87 
to Competitive Product List. Documents are available at www.prc.gov, 
Docket Nos. MC2018-213, CP2018-295.

Elizabeth Reed,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2018-18791 Filed 8-29-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 01-7323

KEVIN EARNEST COX, Petitioner - Appellant, versus RONALD J. ANGELONE, Director of the Department of Corrections, Respondent - Appellee.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. James E. Bradberry, Magistrate Judge. (CA-00-778-2) Submitted: October 24, 2001 Decided: November 13, 2001 Before WILKINS and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.Kevin Earnest Cox, Appellant Pro Se. Stephen R. McCullough, Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).* Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) (1994), Cox waived his right to proceed before a United States district judge and consented to have a United States magistrate judge conduct all proceedings in this case. 2 PER CURIAM: Kevin Earnest Cox seeks to appeal the magistrate judge’s * order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254(West 1994 & Supp. 2001). We have reviewed the record and the magistrate judge’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the magistrate judge. See Cox v. Angelone , No.CA-00-778-2 (E.D. Va. July 11, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED