Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 170 / Friday, August 31, 2018 / Notices 44677 

(A) Demands for Information 

(1) Promptly issue a Demand for 

Information to FE, FES, NG, and FENOC 

requesting site-specific 

decommissioning funding plans for the 

BVNPS, DBNPS, and PNPP; 

(2) Promptly issue a Demand for 

Information to FE, FES, NG, and FENOC 

regarding their reliance on external trust 

funds from FE and FES to satisfy their 

decommissioning financial obligations; 

(3) Promptly issue a Demand for 

Information to FE, FES, NG, and FENOC 

regarding their continued reliance on 

Parent Guarantees from FE to satisfy 

decommissioning funding obligations, 

including the ability of FE to satisfy the 

Parent Guarantee financial test under 

title 10 of the Code of Federal 

Regulations (10 CFR) part 30, appendix 

A; 

(4) Promptly issue a Demand for 

Information to FES, NG, and FENOC to 

the extent that they are relying on 

Parent Guarantees from FES to satisfy 

decommissioning funding obligations, 

including the ability of FES to satisfy 

the Parent Guarantee financial test 

under 10 CFR part 30, appendix A; 

(5) Promptly issue a Demand for 

Information to FE, FES, NG, and FENOC 

regarding their proposed investment 

and financial contribution plans to 

make up the current decommissioning 

shortfall; and 

(6) Promptly issue a Demand for 

Information to FE and FES, respectively, 

regarding each of their commitments to 

guarantee NG and FENOC’s 

decommissioning shortfall in the event 

of bankruptcy. 

(B) Notice of Violation and Penalties 

(1) Promptly issue a Notice of 

Violation against FE, FES, NG, and 

FENOC for operating nuclear facilities 

without sufficient decommissioning 

funds in violation of 42 United States 

Code Annotated (U.S.C.A.), Section 

2201(x)(1) and 10 CFR 50.75; 

(2) Promptly issue civil penalties 

against FE, FES, NG, and FENOC for 

operating nuclear facilities without 

sufficient decommissioning funds in 

violation of 42 U.S.C.A. Section 

2201(x)(1) and 10 CFR 50.75; and 

(3) Promptly issue an Order to 

suspend NG, and FENOC’s licenses for 

BVNPS, DBNPS, and PNPP. 

The ELPC also urges the NRC to 

prohibit NG and FENOC from placing 

their nuclear facilities into SAFSTOR 

for purely financial reasons. In addition, 

ELPC requests that this Petition be given 

immediate emergency consideration in 

light of FE’s and FES’ rapidly 

deteriorating financial conditions. 

The basis for ELPC’s request is 

summarized below: 

1. NG and FENOC’s decommissioning 

trust amounts are insufficient on their 

own to provide reasonable assurance of 

funding. 

2. FE cannot rely on rate increases 

forced on retail ratepayers to pay for the 

decommissioning trust fund shortfalls. 

3. The costs, including SAFSTOR 

costs, may still be much higher than 

expected due to significantly higher 

shortfalls as reported by the Callan 

Institute and recognized flaws in the 

NRC’s cost estimate formula. 

4. On March 28, 2018, FES and 

FENOC announced that they would 

permanently retire all four of their 

reactors within the next 3 years. If 

plants close in 2020 and 2021, the funds 

cannot grow to levels that will pay for 

complete decommissioning. 

5. Parent companies FE and FES filed 

for bankruptcy on March 31, 2018. 

The request is being treated pursuant 

to 10 CFR 2.206 of the Commission’s 

regulations. The request has been 

referred to the Director of the Office of 

Nuclear Reactor Regulation. As 

provided by 10 CFR 2.206, appropriate 

action will be taken on this petition 

within a reasonable time. 

The petitioner met with the Petition 

Review Board on June 19, 2018, to 

discuss the petition; the transcript of 

that meeting is a supplement to the 

petition (ADAMS Accession No. 

ML18194A395). The petition and the 

results of the discussion at the June 19, 

2018, meeting would be considered in 

establishing the schedule for the review 

of the petition. 

Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 27th day 

of August 2018. 

For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission. 

Ho K. Nieh, 

Director, Office of Nuclear Reactor 

Regulation. 

[FR Doc. 2018–18923 Filed 8–30–18; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7590–01–P 

NUCLEAR REGULATORY 

COMMISSION 

[Docket Nos. 50–454 and 50–455; NRC– 

2018–0186] 

Exelon Generation Company, LLC; 

Byron Station, Unit Nos. 1 and 2 

AGENCY: Nuclear Regulatory 

Commission. 

ACTION: License amendment application; 

opportunity to comment, request a 

hearing, and petition for leave to 

intervene. 

SUMMARY: The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory 

Commission (NRC) is considering 

issuance of amendments to Facility 

Operating License Nos. NPF–37 and 

NPF–66, issued to Exelon Generation 

Company (EGC), LLC, for operation of 

the Byron Station, Unit Nos. 1 and 2. 

The proposed amendment extends the 

Completion Time for Technical 

Specification 3.8.1, ‘‘AC SourcesOperating,’’ Required Action A.2, on a 

one-time, temporary basis based on a 

risk-informed approach. 

DATES: Submit comments by October 1, 

2018. Requests for a hearing or petition 

for leave to intervene must be filed by 

October 30, 2018. 

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments 

by any of the following methods: 

• Federal Rulemaking website: Go to 

http://www.regulations.gov and search 

for Docket ID NRC–2018–0186. Address 

questions about NRC dockets to Jennifer 

Borges; telephone: 301–287–9127; 

email: Jennifer.Borges@nrc.gov. For 

technical questions, contact the 

individual listed in the FOR FURTHER

INFORMATION CONTACT section of this 

document. 

• Mail comments to: May Ma, Office 

of Administration, Mail Stop: TWFN– 

A60M, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory 

Commission, Washington, DC 20555– 

0001. 

For additional direction on obtaining 

information and submitting comments, 

see ‘‘Obtaining Information and 

Submitting Comments’’ in the 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section of 

this document. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Joel 

S. Wiebe, Office of Nuclear Reactor 

Regulation, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory 

Commission, Washington, DC 20555– 

0001; telephone: 301–415–6606, email: 

Joel.Wiebe@nrc.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

I. Obtaining Information and 

Submitting Comments 

A. Obtaining Information 

Please refer to Docket ID NRC–2018– 

0186 when contacting the NRC about 

the availability of information for this 

action. You may obtain publiclyavailable information related to this 

action by any of the following methods: 

• Federal Rulemaking website: Go to 

http://www.regulations.gov and search 

for Docket ID NRC–2018–0186. 

• NRC’s Agencywide Documents 

Access and Management System 

(ADAMS): You may obtain publiclyavailable documents online in the 

ADAMS Public Documents collection at 

http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/ 

adams.html. To begin the search, select 

‘‘Begin Web-based ADAMS Search.’’ For 

problems with ADAMS, please contact 

the NRC’s Public Document Room (PDR) 


daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with NOTICES
44678 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 170 / Friday, August 31, 2018 / Notices 

reference staff at 1–800–397–4209, 301– 

415–4737, or by email to pdr.resource@

nrc.gov. The License Amendment 

Request for a One-Time Extension to 

Technical Specification 3.8.1, ‘‘AC 

Sources-Operating,’’ Required Action 

A.2 is available in ADAMS under 

Accession No. ML18226A097. 

• NRC’s PDR: You may examine and 

purchase copies of public documents at 

the NRC’s PDR, Room O1–F21, One 

White Flint North, 11555 Rockville 

Pike, Rockville, Maryland 20852. 

B. Submitting Comments 

Please include Docket ID NRC–2018– 

0186 in your comment submission. 

The NRC cautions you not to include 

identifying or contact information that 

you do not want to be publicly 

disclosed in your comment submission. 

The NRC will post all comment 

submissions at http://

www.regulations.gov as well as enter the 

comment submissions into ADAMS. 

The NRC does not routinely edit 

comment submissions to remove 

identifying or contact information. 

If you are requesting or aggregating 

comments from other persons for 

submission to the NRC, then you should 

inform those persons not to include 

identifying or contact information that 

they do not want to be publicly 

disclosed in their comment submission. 

Your request should state that the NRC 

does not routinely edit comment 

submissions to remove such information 

before making the comment 

submissions available to the public or 

entering the comment into ADAMS. 

II. Introduction 

The NRC is considering issuance of 

amendments to Facility Operating 

License Nos. NPF–37 and NPF–66, 

issued to Exelon Generation Company 

(EGC), LLC, for operation of the Byron 

Station, Unit Nos. 1 and 2, located in 

Ogle County, Illinois. 

The proposed amendment extends the 

Completion Time for Technical 

Specification 3.8.1, ‘‘AC SourcesOperating,’’ Required Action A.2, on a 

one-time, temporary basis based on a 

risk-informed approach. 

Before any issuance of the proposed 

license amendment, the NRC will need 

to make the findings required by the 

Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended 

(the Act), and NRC’s regulations. 

The NRC has made a proposed 

determination that the license 

amendment request involves no 

significant hazards consideration. Under 

the NRC’s regulations in section 50.92 of 

title 10 of the Code of Federal 

Regulations (10 CFR), this means that 

operation of the facility in accordance 

with the proposed amendment would 

not (1) involve a significant increase in 

the probability or consequences of an 

accident previously evaluated; or (2) 

create the possibility of a new or 

different kind of accident from any 

accident previously evaluated; or (3) 

involve a significant reduction in a 

margin of safety. As required by 10 CFR 

50.91(a), the licensee has provided its 

analysis of the issue of no significant 

hazards consideration, which is 

presented below: 

1. Does the proposed change involve a 

significant increase in the probability or 

consequences of an accident previously 

evaluated? 

Response: No. 

The proposed change will provide a onetime, risk-informed revision to the CT 

[COMPLETION TIME] for the loss of one 

offsite source for Byron Station, Units 1 and 

2 from 72 hours to 79 days. The proposed 

one-time extension of the CT for the loss of 

one offsite power circuit does not 

significantly increase the probability of an 

accident previously evaluated. The TSs 

[Technical Specifications] will continue to 

require equipment that will power safety 

related equipment necessary to perform any 

required safety function. The one-time 

extension of the CT to 79 days does not affect 

the design of the Unit 1 SATs [station 

auxiliary transformers], the interface of the 

SATs with other plant systems, the operating 

characteristic of the SATs, or the reliability 

of the SATs. 

The consequence of a loss of offsite power 

(LOOP) event has been evaluated in the 

Byron Station Updated Final Safety Analysis 

Report (Reference 23 [in EGC’s letter dated 

August 10, 2018]) and the Station Blackout 

evaluation. Increasing the CT for one offsite 

power source on a one-time basis from 72 

hours to 79 days does not increase the 

consequences of a LOOP event nor change 

the evaluation of LOOP events. The plant 

will continue to respond to a LOOP in the 

same manner and with the same 

consequences as previously evaluated. 

Therefore, the proposed changes do not 

involve a significant increase in the 

probability or consequences of an accident 

previously evaluated. 

2. Does the proposed change create the 

possibility of a new or different kind of 

accident from any accident previously 

evaluated? 

Response: No. 

The proposed change does not result in a 

change in the manner in which the electrical 

distribution subsystems provide plant 

protection. The proposed change will only 

affect the time allowed to restore the 

operability of the offsite power source 

through a SAT. The proposed change to 

extend the TS CT does not affect the 

configuration, or operation of the plant. The 

proposed change to the CT will facilitate 

completion of repairs which will restore 

plant design to its as-built configuration, and 

will eliminate the necessity to shut down 

both Units if SAT 242–1 fails or requires 

maintenance that goes beyond the current TS 

CT of 72 hours. This change will support the 

restoration of the long-term reliability of the 

345kV offsite circuit SAT which is common 

to both Byron Units. 

There are no changes to the SATs or the 

supporting systems operating characteristics 

or conditions. The change to the CT does not 

change any existing accident scenarios, nor 

create any new or different accident 

scenarios. In addition, the change does not 

impose any new or different requirements or 

eliminate any existing requirements. The 

change does not alter any of the assumptions 

made in the safety analysis. 

Therefore, the proposed changes do not 

create the possibility of a new or different 

kind of accident from any previously 

evaluated. 

3. Does the proposed change involve a 

significant reduction in a margin of safety? 

Response: No. 

The proposed change does not affect the 

acceptance criteria for any analyzed event 

nor is there a change to any safety limit. The 

proposed change does not alter the manner 

in which safety limits, limiting safety system 

settings, or limiting conditions for operation 

are determined. Neither the safety analyses 

nor the safety analysis acceptance criteria are 

affected by this change. The proposed change 

will not result in plant operation in a 

configuration outside the current design 

basis. The proposed activity only increases, 

for a one-time unanticipated occurrence, the 

period when Byron Station, Units 1 and 2 

may operate with one offsite power source. 

The margin of safety is maintained by 

maintaining the ability to safely shut down 

the plant and remove residual heat. 

Therefore, the proposed changes do not 

involve a significant reduction in a margin of 

safety. 

Based on the above evaluation, EGC 

concludes that the proposed amendments do 

not involve a significant hazards 

consideration under the standards set forth in 

10 CFR 50.92(c), and, accordingly, a finding 

of no significant hazards consideration is 

justified. 

The NRC staff has reviewed the 

licensee’s analysis and, based on this 

review, it appears that the three 

standards of 10 CFR 50.92(c) are 

satisfied. Therefore, the NRC staff 

proposes to determine that the license 

amendment request involves a no 

significant hazards consideration. 

The NRC is seeking public comments 

on this proposed determination that the 

license amendment request involves no 

significant hazards consideration. Any 

comments received within 30 days after 

the date of publication of this notice 

will be considered in making any final 

determination. 

Normally, the Commission will not 

issue the amendment until the 

expiration of 60 days after the date of 

publication of this notice. The 

Commission may issue the license 

amendment before expiration of the 60- 

day notice period if the Commission 

concludes the amendment involves no 


daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 170 / Friday, August 31, 2018 / Notices 44679 

significant hazards consideration. In 

addition, the Commission may issue the 

amendment prior to the expiration of 

the 30-day comment period if 

circumstances change during the 30-day 

comment period such that failure to act 

in a timely way would result, for 

example, in derating or shutdown of the 

facility. If the Commission takes action 

prior to the expiration of either the 

comment period or the notice period, it 

will publish in the Federal Register a 

notice of issuance. If the Commission 

makes a final no significant hazards 

consideration determination, any 

hearing will take place after issuance. 

The Commission expects that the need 

to take this action will occur very 

infrequently. 

III. Opportunity To Request a Hearing 

and Petition for Leave To Intervene 

Within 60 days after the date of 

publication of this notice, any persons 

(petitioner) whose interest may be 

affected by this action may file a request 

for a hearing and petition for leave to 

intervene (petition) with respect to the 

action. Petitions shall be filed in 

accordance with the Commission’s 

‘‘Agency Rules of Practice and 

Procedure’’ in 10 CFR part 2. Interested 

persons should consult a current copy 

of 10 CFR 2.309. The NRC’s regulations 

are accessible electronically from the 

NRC Library on the NRC’s website at 

http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doccollections/cfr/. Alternatively, a copy of 

the regulations is available at the NRC’s 

Public Document Room, located at One 

White Flint North, Room O1–F21, 11555 

Rockville Pike (first floor), Rockville, 

Maryland 20852. If a petition is filed, 

the Commission or a presiding officer 

will rule on the petition and, if 

appropriate, a notice of a hearing will be 

issued. 

As required by 10 CFR 2.309(d) the 

petition should specifically explain the 

reasons why intervention should be 

permitted with particular reference to 

the following general requirements for 

standing: (1) The name, address, and 

telephone number of the petitioner; (2) 

the nature of the petitioner’s right under 

the Act to be made a party to the 

proceeding; (3) the nature and extent of 

the petitioner’s property, financial, or 

other interest in the proceeding; and (4) 

the possible effect of any decision or 

order which may be entered in the 

proceeding on the petitioner’s interest. 

In accordance with 10 CFR 2.309(f), 

the petition must also set forth the 

specific contentions which the 

petitioner seeks to have litigated in the 

proceeding. Each contention must 

consist of a specific statement of the 

issue of law or fact to be raised or 

controverted. In addition, the petitioner 

must provide a brief explanation of the 

bases for the contention and a concise 

statement of the alleged facts or expert 

opinion which support the contention 

and on which the petitioner intends to 

rely in proving the contention at the 

hearing. The petitioner must also 

provide references to the specific 

sources and documents on which the 

petitioner intends to rely to support its 

position on the issue. The petition must 

include sufficient information to show 

that a genuine dispute exists with the 

applicant or licensee on a material issue 

of law or fact. Contentions must be 

limited to matters within the scope of 

the proceeding. The contention must be 

one which, if proven, would entitle the 

petitioner to relief. A petitioner who 

fails to satisfy the requirements at 10 

CFR 2.309(f) with respect to at least one 

contention will not be permitted to 

participate as a party. 

Those permitted to intervene become 

parties to the proceeding, subject to any 

limitations in the order granting leave to 

intervene. Parties have the opportunity 

to participate fully in the conduct of the 

hearing with respect to resolution of 

that party’s admitted contentions, 

including the opportunity to present 

evidence, consistent with the NRC’s 

regulations, policies, and procedures. 

Petitions must be filed no later than 

60 days from the date of publication of 

this notice. Petitions and motions for 

leave to file new or amended 

contentions that are filed after the 

deadline will not be entertained absent 

a determination by the presiding officer 

that the filing demonstrates good cause 

by satisfying the three factors in 10 CFR 

2.309(c)(1)(i) through (iii). The petition 

must be filed in accordance with the 

filing instructions in the ‘‘Electronic 

Submissions (E-Filing)’’ section of this 

document. 

If a hearing is requested, and the 

Commission has not made a final 

determination on the issue of no 

significant hazards consideration, the 

Commission will make a final 

determination on the issue of no 

significant hazards consideration. The 

final determination will serve to 

establish when the hearing is held. If the 

final determination is that the 

amendment request involves no 

significant hazards consideration, the 

Commission may issue the amendment 

and make it immediately effective, 

notwithstanding the request for a 

hearing. Any hearing would take place 

after issuance of the amendment. If the 

final determination is that the 

amendment request involves a 

significant hazards consideration, then 

any hearing held would take place 

before the issuance of the amendment 

unless the Commission finds an 

imminent danger to the health or safety 

of the public, in which case it will issue 

an appropriate order or rule under 10 

CFR part 2. 

A State, local governmental body, 

Federally-recognized Indian Tribe, or 

agency thereof, may submit a petition to 

the Commission to participate as a party 

under 10 CFR 2.309(h)(1). The petition 

should state the nature and extent of the 

petitioner’s interest in the proceeding. 

The petition should be submitted to the 

Commission by October 30, 2018. The 

petition must be filed in accordance 

with the filing instructions in the 

‘‘Electronic Submissions (E-Filing)’’ 

section of this document, and should 

meet the requirements for petitions set 

forth in this section, except that under 

10 CFR 2.309(h)(2) a State, local 

governmental body, or Federallyrecognized Indian Tribe, or agency 

thereof does not need to address the 

standing requirements in 10 CFR 

2.309(d) if the facility is located within 

its boundaries. Alternatively, a State, 

local governmental body, Federallyrecognized Indian Tribe, or agency 

thereof may participate as a non-party 

under 10 CFR 2.315(c). 

If a hearing is granted, any person 

who is not a party to the proceeding and 

is not affiliated with or represented by 

a party may, at the discretion of the 

presiding officer, be permitted to make 

a limited appearance pursuant to the 

provisions of 10 CFR 2.315(a). A person 

making a limited appearance may make 

an oral or written statement of his or her 

position on the issues but may not 

otherwise participate in the proceeding. 

A limited appearance may be made at 

any session of the hearing or at any 

prehearing conference, subject to the 

limits and conditions as may be 

imposed by the presiding officer. Details 

regarding the opportunity to make a 

limited appearance will be provided by 

the presiding officer if such sessions are 

scheduled. 

IV. Electronic Submissions (E-Filing) 

All documents filed in NRC 

adjudicatory proceedings, including a 

request for hearing and petition for 

leave to intervene (petition), any motion 

or other document filed in the 

proceeding prior to the submission of a 

request for hearing or petition to 

intervene, and documents filed by 

interested governmental entities that 

request to participate under 10 CFR 

2.315(c), must be filed in accordance 

with the NRC’s E-Filing rule (72 FR 

49139; August 28, 2007, as amended at 

77 FR 46562; August 3, 2012). The EFiling process requires participants to 


daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with NOTICES
44680 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 170 / Friday, August 31, 2018 / Notices 

submit and serve all adjudicatory 

documents over the internet, or in some 

cases to mail copies on electronic 

storage media. Detailed guidance on 

making electronic submissions may be 

found in the Guidance for Electronic 

Submissions to the NRC and on the NRC 

website at http://www.nrc.gov/site-help/ 

e-submittals.html. Participants may not 

submit paper copies of their filings 

unless they seek an exemption in 

accordance with the procedures 

described below. 

To comply with the procedural 

requirements of E-Filing, at least 10 

days prior to the filing deadline, the 

participant should contact the Office of 

the Secretary by email at 

Hearing.Docket@nrc.gov, or by 

telephone at 301–415–1677, to (1) 

request a digital identification (ID) 

certificate, which allows the participant 

(or its counsel or representative) to 

digitally sign submissions and access 

the E-Filing system for any proceeding 

in which it is participating; and (2) 

advise the Secretary that the participant 

will be submitting a petition or other 

adjudicatory document (even in 

instances in which the participant, or its 

counsel or representative, already holds 

an NRC-issued digital ID certificate). 

Based upon this information, the 

Secretary will establish an electronic 

docket for the hearing in this proceeding 

if the Secretary has not already 

established an electronic docket. 

Information about applying for a 

digital ID certificate is available on the 

NRC’s public website at http://

www.nrc.gov/site-help/e-submittals/ 

getting-started.html. Once a participant 

has obtained a digital ID certificate and 

a docket has been created, the 

participant can then submit 

adjudicatory documents. Submissions 

must be in Portable Document Format 

(PDF). Additional guidance on PDF 

submissions is available on the NRC’s 

public website at http://www.nrc.gov/ 

site-help/electronic-sub-ref-mat.html. A 

filing is considered complete at the time 

the document is submitted through the 

NRC’s E-Filing system. To be timely, an 

electronic filing must be submitted to 

the E-Filing system no later than 11:59 

p.m. Eastern Time on the due date. 

Upon receipt of a transmission, the EFiling system time-stamps the document 

and sends the submitter an email notice 

confirming receipt of the document. The 

E-Filing system also distributes an email 

notice that provides access to the 

document to the NRC’s Office of the 

General Counsel and any others who 

have advised the Office of the Secretary 

that they wish to participate in the 

proceeding, so that the filer need not 

serve the document on those 

participants separately. Therefore, 

applicants and other participants (or 

their counsel or representative) must 

apply for and receive a digital ID 

certificate before adjudicatory 

documents are filed so that they can 

obtain access to the documents via the 

E-Filing system. 

A person filing electronically using 

the NRC’s adjudicatory E-Filing system 

may seek assistance by contacting the 

NRC’s Electronic Filing Help Desk 

through the ‘‘Contact Us’’ link located 

on the NRC’s public website at http://

www.nrc.gov/site-help/esubmittals.html, by email to 

MSHD.Resource@nrc.gov, or by a tollfree call at 1–866–672–7640. The NRC 

Electronic Filing Help Desk is available 

between 9 a.m. and 6 p.m., Eastern 

Time, Monday through Friday, 

excluding government holidays. 

Participants who believe that they 

have a good cause for not submitting 

documents electronically must file an 

exemption request, in accordance with 

10 CFR 2.302(g), with their initial paper 

filing stating why there is good cause for 

not filing electronically and requesting 

authorization to continue to submit 

documents in paper format. Such filings 

must be submitted by: (1) First class 

mail addressed to the Office of the 

Secretary of the Commission, U.S. 

Nuclear Regulatory Commission, 

Washington, DC 20555–0001, Attention: 

Rulemaking and Adjudications Staff; or 

(2) courier, express mail, or expedited 

delivery service to the Office of the 

Secretary, 11555 Rockville Pike, 

Rockville, Maryland 20852, Attention: 

Rulemaking and Adjudications Staff. 

Participants filing adjudicatory 

documents in this manner are 

responsible for serving the document on 

all other participants. Filing is 

considered complete by first-class mail 

as of the time of deposit in the mail, or 

by courier, express mail, or expedited 

delivery service upon depositing the 

document with the provider of the 

service. A presiding officer, having 

granted an exemption request from 

using E-Filing, may require a participant 

or party to use E-Filing if the presiding 

officer subsequently determines that the 

reason for granting the exemption from 

use of E-Filing no longer exists. 

Documents submitted in adjudicatory 

proceedings will appear in the NRC’s 

electronic hearing docket which is 

available to the public at https://

adams.nrc.gov/ehd, unless excluded 

pursuant to an order of the Commission 

or the presiding officer. If you do not 

have an NRC-issued digital ID certificate 

as described above, click cancel when 

the link requests certificates and you 

will be automatically directed to the 

NRC’s electronic hearing dockets where 

you will be able to access any publicly 

available documents in a particular 

hearing docket. Participants are 

requested not to include personal 

privacy information, such as social 

security numbers, home addresses, or 

personal phone numbers in their filings, 

unless an NRC regulation or other law 

requires submission of such 

information. For example, in some 

instances, individuals provide home 

addresses in order to demonstrate 

proximity to a facility or site. With 

respect to copyrighted works, except for 

limited excerpts that serve the purpose 

of the adjudicatory filings and would 

constitute a Fair Use application, 

participants are requested not to include 

copyrighted materials in their 

submission. 

For further details with respect to this 

action, see the application for license 

amendment dated August 10, 2018 

(ADAMS Accession No. ML18226A097). 

Attorney for licensee: Tamra Domeyer, 

Associate General Counsel, Exelon 

Nuclear, 4300 Winfield Road, 

Warrenville, IL 60555. 

NRC Branch Chief: David J. Wrona. 

Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 27th day 

of August 2018. 

For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission. 

Joel S. Wiebe, 

Senior Project Manager, Plant Licensing 

Branch III, Division of Operating Reactors, 

Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation. 

[FR Doc. 2018–18922 Filed 8–30–18; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7590–01–P 

NUCLEAR REGULATORY 

COMMISSION 

[Docket No. 72–1050; NRC–2016–0231] 

Integrated Storage Partner’s Waste 

Control Specialists Consolidated 

Interim Storage Facility 

Correction 

In notice document 2018–18758, 

appearing on pages 44070–44075 in the 

Issue of Wednesday, August 29, 2018, 

make the following correction: 

On page 44070, in the second column, 

under the heading ‘‘DATES’’, on the third 

line, the entry ‘‘August 29, 2018’’ is 

corrected to read ‘‘October 29, 2018’’. 

[FR Doc. C1–2018–18758 Filed 8–30–18; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 1301–00–D 


daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with NOTICES