alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                             486
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                          92,692
<DEPRECIATION>                                   8,697
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  87,403
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                         60,324
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            15
<OTHER-SE>                                      23,124
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    87,403
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 7,817
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    3,293
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 1,318
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,835
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     26
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 26
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                        26
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .02
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .02


</TABLE>
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk's Office, Atlanta, November 13, 2018.

I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes 

of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto 

affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Court of Appeals 

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA, November 13, 2018

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order

A19D0135. IN THE INTEREST OF C. S. et al., CHILDREN (MOTHER) .

Upon consideration of the Application for Discretionary Appeal, it is ordered that it be 

hereby DENIED.

LC NUMBERS:

1801428 1801429
Exhibit 4.7

Translation for information purpose only

CAISSE DES DEPOTS ET CONSIGNATIONS

Savings
Management Financial ManagementI.F. Director
Réf. DFFE -2004 -32
Catherine LE CORRE

Paris,
March 16, 2004

By
letter dated March 5, 2004, you have requested the approval ofCaisse des Dépôts et Consignationsto extend
until May 31, 2004 (the "Extension") the waiver, approved in October 2003, to invoke, until March 31, 2004, its rights for certain Events of Default or Potential Events of Default
against Euro Disney S.C.A. or Euro Disneyland S.N.C. (the "Waiver").

I
am pleased to confirm the approval of theCaisse des Dépôts et Consignationsof this extension and the terms and
conditions of this extension.

This
extension is strictly limited to the Events of Default or Potential Events of Default expressly referred to in the waiver and shall not extend and shall not be construed as extending to a waiver
of any otherCaisse des Dépôts et Consignationsright not included in the Waiver.

Yours
faithfully,

Jacques
Ollivier

---

QuickLinks
A R AMBUlANCE
October 20, 2014 FederalAviation Administration 600 IndependenceAvenue, SW Wilbur Wright Building, Suite 2W1000 Washington, DC 20591 ATTN: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 To Whom it May Concern: American Medflight hereby requests a hearing in regards to Case Number 2014WP110010. k you, Copyto: Naomi Tsuda, Regional Counsel PO Box 92007 Los Angeles, CA 90009-2007

PO Box 10166 pll 775 856-5800 b: 775-855-5801Re11D, Nevada 895'10 www· amencanm2driighr.com
Smith Barney Futures Management LLC
                         388 Greenwich Street, 7th Floor
                          New York, New York 10013-2396

May 31, 2000


John W. Henry & Company, Inc.
One Glendinning Place
Westport, Ct. 06880
Attn: Ms. Beth Kenton

         Re:      Management Agreement Renewals

Dear Ms. Kenton:

We are  writing  with  respect  to your  management  agreements  concerning  the
commodity pools to which reference is made below (the "Management  Agreements").
We are  extending the term of the  Management  Agreements  through June 30, 2001
and all other provisions of the Management Agreements will remain unchanged.

o        Hutton Investors Futures Fund, L.P. II  (HIFF II)
o        Shearson Lehman Select Advisors Futures Fund L.P.
o        Shearson Mid-West Futures Fund
o        Smith Barney Mid-West Futures Fund L.P. II
o        Smith Barney Diversified Futures Fund L.P.
o        Smith Barney Diversified Futures Fund L.P. II
o        Smith Barney Principal Plus Futures Fund L.P.
o        Smith Barney Principal Plus Futures Fund L.P. II
o        Smith Barney Westport Futures Fund L.P.

Please  acknowledge  receipt of this  modification  by signing  one copy of this
letter and returning it to the  attention of Mr. Daniel  Dantuono at the address
above or fax to  212-723-8985.  If you have any  questions  I can be  reached at
212-723-5416.

Very truly yours,

SMITH BARNEY FUTURES MANAGEMENT LLC

By:
         Daniel A. Dantuono
         Chief Financial Officer,
         Director & Treasurer



AGREED AND ACCEPTED

JOHN W. HENRY & COMPANY, INC.


DAD/sr
May 26, 2011

MEMORANDUM

From: William H. Maxwell EPA/SPPD/ESG (D243-01)

To: Docket Number EPA-HQ-OAR-2009-0234

Subject: Teleconference with FBR Capital Markets & Company

Attendees :

EPA: Ellen Kurlansky, EPA/OAR/OPAR Nick Hutson, EPA/OAQPS/SPPD/ESG

FBR Capital Markets & Company:

Marc DeCroisset Benjamin Salisbury Igor Gitelman

Discussion :

The capability of activated carbon injection (ACI) for mercury cont rol and dry sorb ent injection (DSI) for acid gas control and th e levels of control seen in the ICR data were discussed.
----

|   | (1)    | Registration      Statement on Form S-4 (File No. 333-34641);      |
|--------|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |                                                               |
|   | (2)    | Registration      Statement on Form S-8 (File No. 33-82282);       |
|   |   |                                                               |
|   | (3)    | Registration      Statement on Form S-3 (File No. 333-113782);     |
|   |   |                                                               |
|   | (4)    | Registration      Statement on Form S-3 (File No. 333-116107);     |
|   |   |                                                               |
|   | (5)    | Registration      Statement on Form S-8 (File No. 333-124676); and |
|   |   |                                                               |
|   | (6)    | Registration      Statement on Form S-8 (File No.333-127481).      |
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350



In connection with the Quarterly Report of SMTP, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Semyon Dukach, Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that, to my knowledge:



1.

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2.

To my knowledge, the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the period covered by the Report.



|                    |                            
|------------------- | ---------------------------
|Date :  May 9, 2011 | /s/ Semyon Dukach          
|                    | Semyon Dukach              
|                    | Principal Financial Officer
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 21
- 6115

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,

v. DARRYL SCOTT, a/k/a Kojak , Defendant

- Appellant

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland , at Baltimore

. James K. Bredar, Chief District Judge. ( 1:16

- cr - 00429

- JKB

- 3 )

Submitted : June 23, 2021 Decided: July 14, 2021

Before DIAZ and QUATTLEBAUM , Circuit Judges , and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge

.
Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

. Darryl Scott , Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Darryl Scott appeals the district court’s orders den ying hi s motion for compassionate release pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A)(i) and twice denying reconsideration

. We review a district court’s denial of a motion for compassionate release for an abuse of discretion. United States v. Kibble , 992 F.3d 326, 329 (4th Cir. 2021)

. Upon review of the record, we find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Scott , No. 1:16

- cr - 00429

- JKB

- 3 (D. Md. July 17, 2020; Aug. 4, 2020; Dec. 18, 2020). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Exhibit 10.2.5c

 

THIRD AMENDMENT
 TO THE
 DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN OF 2005 FOR EMPLOYEES OF
 PINNACLE WEST CAPITAL CORPORATION AND AFFILIATES

 

Effective as of January 1, 2005, Pinnacle West Capital Corporation (the “Company”) adopted the Deferred Compensation Plan of 2005 for Employees of Pinnacle West Capital Corporation and Affiliates (the “Plan”).  The Plan has been amended on two prior occasions.  By this instrument, the Company now desires to amend the Plan to clarify the provisions of Section 5.1(a).

 

1.             This Third Amendment amends only the provision of the Plan noted below.  Those provisions not expressly amended shall be considered in full force and effect.  This Third Amendment also supersedes the other provisions of the Plan to the extent those provisions are inconsistent with the provisions and intent of this Third Amendment.

 

2.             Section 5.1(a) (Payment of Termination Benefit — Lump Sum or Installments) of the Plan shall be amended and restated in its entirety to read as follows:

 

5.1                               Payment of Termination Benefit.

 

(a)           Lump Sum or Installments.  A Participant may elect to receive his or her Termination Benefit in a lump sum or in equal annual payments over a period of five (5), ten (10) or fifteen (15) years (the latter determined in accordance with Section 3.7 above) by so electing in an Election Form.  In the Election Form, the Participant also shall specify whether the lump sum payment will be paid or the installment payments will begin within 30 days following either (i) his or her Separation from Service or (ii) the later of his or her attainment of age fifty-five (55) or his or her Separation from Service.  The Participant may change his or her election to an allowable alternative payout date or period by submitting a new Election Form to the Company in accordance with Section 3.6.  Failure to make an election will result in the benefits being paid in a lump sum within 30 days after the Participant’s Separation from Service.  Any election under this Section 5.1 shall be irrevocable,

 











 

except to the extent provided in Section 3.6.  Notwithstanding the foregoing, payment of the Termination Benefit shall not be made or commence prior to the date which is six (6) months after the date of a Participant’s Separation from Service in the case of a Participant who is determined to be a Specified Employee.

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Pinnacle West Capital Corporation has caused this Third Amendment to be executed as of this 18th day of December, 2013.

 

	
 
    	
PINNACLE   WEST CAPITAL CORPORATION
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
By:
    	
/s/   Donald R. Brandt
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
Its:
    	
Chairman   of the Board, President and CEO
    


 

2
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v *772James T. Hall, Appellant.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Westchester County (Nicolai, J.), rendered January 8, 1990, convicting him of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree (two counts) and criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree (two counts), upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

We find that the defendant’s motion to dismiss the indictment on speedy trial grounds was properly denied. The defendant was arrested based on a felony complaint in December 1987, and subsequently released on bail. A bench warrant was issued for his arrest on May 23, 1988, after he failed to appear in court on several occasions. The defendant was arrested in Virginia on February 4, 1989, on an unrelated charge and waived extradition to New York.

On appeal, the defendant contends that the eight-month delay in prosecution from May 24, 1988, to his appearance in court on February 6, 1989, is attributable to the People. No issue is raised on appeal with respect to the delay prior to May 24, 1988, and the record indicates that the defendant signed a waiver of his right to a speedy trial while his case was pending in the County Court during that period. We need not address the People’s contention that this waiver applied to the period after the bench warrant was issued on May 23, 1988, as we conclude that the People met their burden of establishing that the defendant’s location was unknown and that he was attempting to avoid apprehension or prosecution *(see,*CPL 30.30 [4] [c]; *People v Jackson,*142 AD2d 597). No hearing was required on the speedy trial motion as the parties’ moving papers do not raise a factual dispute which must be resolved *(see, People v Santos,*68 NY2d 859; *People v Gruden,*42 NY2d 214).

The defendant contends that the People failed to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the subject vials contained cocaine. Viewing the evidence adduced at the trial in the light most favorable to the People *(see, People v Contes,*60 NY2d 620), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt. Upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict was not against the weight of the evidence (CPL 470.15 [5]).

The defendant’s remaining contention is unpreserved for appellate review *(see,*CPL 470.05 [2]; *People v Udzinski,*146 AD2d 245), and we decline to exercise our interest of justice *773jurisdiction to review it. Lawrence, J. P., Harwood, Rosenblatt and O’Brien, JJ., concur.
**Exhibit 23**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

We hereby consent to the incorporation byreference in the Registration Statement on Form S-3 (Nos. 333-17715, 333-18695, 333-49505, 333-67271 and 333-106855) and on Form S-8 (Nos. 333-06899, 333-15701, 333-16043, 333-30445, 333-41305, 333-49495, 333-49493, 333-58261, 333-69915, 333-79001,333-88329, 333-64252, 333-131942 and 333-138759) of MPS Group, Inc. of our report dated February 27, 2008 relating to the consolidated financial statements, financial statement schedule and the effectiveness of internal control over financialreporting, which appears in this Form 10-K. 

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP 

Jacksonville, Florida 

February 27, 2008
Exhibit 21

Subsidiaries



|                                       |  |                                             
|-------------------------------------- |  | --------------------------------------------
|                                       |  | State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation
|Cooperative Bank                       |  | North Carolina                              
|Lumina Mortgage Company (1)            |  | North Carolina                              
|CS&L Holdings, Inc. (1)                |  | Virginia                                    
|CS&L Real Estate Trust, Inc. (2)       |  | North Carolina                              
|Cooperative Bankshares Capital Trust I |  | Delaware                                    

---

|(1) | Wholly owned subsidiary of Cooperative Bank
|--- | -------------------------------------------

|(2) | Majority owned subsidiary of C S & L Holdings, Inc.
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------
#### Linda PORTER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee. Robert E. PORTER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Nos. 72-566, 72-567.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Feb. 16, 1973.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
(April 4, 1991)

#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Gerald Ingraham, Appellant.

Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Broome County (Monserrate, J.), rendered February 26, 1987, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crime of burglary in the first degree.

The record supports County Court’s findings that defendant voluntarily made a statement after he was given his *Miranda*warnings, did not request to speak to an attorney and was not promised anything by the detectives. Any conflict in the testimony given at the suppression hearing merely presented a credibility question for County Court to resolve *(see, People v Munhall,*92 AD2d 1060, 1061) and its determination will only be rejected on appeal if unsupported as a matter of law *(see, People v Jackson,*101 AD2d 955, 955-956). In addition, we see no reason to disturb defendant’s prison sentence of 9 to 18 years. He entered into a plea agreement knowing that he would receive the sentence ultimately imposed by County Court and a pending charge of violation of probation was dismissed *(see, People v Kazepis,*101 AD2d 816, 817).

Judgment affirmed. Casey, J. P., Mikoll, Yesawich, Jr., Mercure and Crew III, JJ., concur.
----

|   | (1)    | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                     |
|--------|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |                                                                                                                                                                |
|   | (2)    | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |

|   | /s/ Jeffrey I. Badgley                        |   |
|--------|-----------------------------------------------|--------|
|   | Jeffrey      I. Badgley                       |   |
|   | President      and Co-Chief Executive Officer |   |
Dismissed and Opinion Filed October 3, 2018.

In The

Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05-18-00621-CV

URBAN LEAGUE OF GREATER DALLAS AND NORTH CENTRAL TEXAS DBA 

URBAN COMMUNITY CENTER, Appellant

V.

COMERICA BANK, A TEXAS BANKING ASSOCIATION, Appellee

On Appeal from the 14th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DC-17-07418

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Chief Justice Wright, Justice Myers, and Justice Evans

Opinion by Justice Evans

Before the Court is appellee’s motion to dismiss the appeal based on appellant’s failure to 

file the clerk’s record. Our records reflect Dallas County District Clerk Felicia Pitre informed the 

Court July 9, 2018 that the clerk’s record was being held for non-payment of the clerk’s fee. That 

same day, we directed appellant to file, within ten days, written verification it had paid or made 

arrangements to pay for the clerk’s record. Although we cautioned appellant that failure to comply 

could result in dismissal of the appeal without further notice, appellant has not responded. See 

TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3(b). Accordingly, we grant appellee’s motion and dismiss the appeal. See id.

42.3(b),(c).

180621F.P05

/David Evans/

DAVID EVANS

JUSTICE
–2–

Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

JUDGMENT

URBAN LEAGUE OF GREATER 

DALLAS AND NORTH CENTRAL 

TEXAS DBA URBAN COMMUNITY 

CENTER, Appellant

No. 05-18-00621-CV V.

COMERICA BANK, A TEXAS 

BANKING ASSOCIATION, Appellee

On Appeal from the 14th Judicial District 

Court, Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DC-17-07418.

Opinion delivered by Justice Evans, Chief 

Justice Wright and Justice Myers 

participating.

In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, we DISMISS the appeal.

We ORDER appellee Comerica Bank, a Texas Banking Association, recover its costs, if 

any, of this appeal from appellant Urban League of Greater Dallas and North Central Texas dba 

Urban Community Center.

Judgment entered this 3rd day of October, 2018.
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Finance and Accounting Service Providing payment services for the U.S. Department of Defense

Search
Search

Search

              - 
              - 
              - 
              - 
              - 

-  Military Member		 
-  Retired Military & Annuitant		 
-  Civilian Employee		 
-  Contractor & Vendor		 

Homelegislativeaffairscongressionalstaffs

                        - Congressional Inquiries
                        - Required Documents
                        - 1099R and W2 Tax Statements

### Stay Connected

Department of Defense     Department of Veterans Affairs     Military Employment Verification     Warrior Care Website     Defense Contract Mgmt Agency  DoD Forms     Department of State     Civilian Personnel Mgmt Service     DTS Travel Center     System for Award Mgmt (SAM)    Congressional/LegislationPersonnel Force Innovation     Freedom of Information Act     DFAS Hotline   Contact Us     Accessibility / Section 508    EEO / No Fear Act  

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil