alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, DC 20549  FORM 10-Q/A  [X] Quarterly Report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934  For the period ended: December 31, 2010.  [ ] Transition Report pursuant to 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Ac of 1934  For the transition period from         to  Commission File Number:   333-171741  China Complant Group Inc __________________________________________________ (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)  Nevada                                           27-4052171 --------------------------------                    ---------------------------------- (State or other jurisdiction of                          (IRS Employer Identification No.) incorporation or organization)  Room 51,_Floor 12 of Building B, FuTian Oriental Plaza, HangHai East Road, ZhenZhou, Henan, 450000, China (Address of principal executive offices)  Registrant's telephone number, including area code:  86-371-6911-2138  Indicated by check whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the issuer was required to file such reports), and  (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days Yes  [x]   No  [ ]  Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of large accelerated filer"," accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):  Large accelerated filer [ ]             Accelerated filer [ ]  Non-accelerated filer [ ](Do not        Small reporting company [x] check if smaller reporting company)    Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).   Yes  []  No  [x]  The number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer's classes of common stock, as of the close of the latest practicable date: 25,000,000 shares of common stock with par value of $0.0001 per share outstanding as of February 21, 2011.  - 1 -                                     - 2 -
----

----

I Mededelingen

Commissie

----

MEDEDELING VAN DE COMMISSIE IN HET KADER VAN DE UITVOERING VAN RICHTLIJN 73/23/EEG

(2005/C 102/01)

(voor de EER relevante tekst)

(Bekendmaking van titels en referentienummers van geharmoniseerde normen in het kader van de richtlijn)

Voorbeeld: Voor EN 60034-2: 1996 geldt het volgende:

Waarschuwing:

Deze lijst vervangt de vorige lijsten die in het Publicatieblad van de Europese Unie gepubliceerd werden.

----

(1)  CEN: rue de Stassart/De Stassartstraat 36, B - 1050 Brussels, tel: (32-2) 550 08 11, fax: (32-2) 550 08 19 (http://www.cenorm.be)

CENELEC: rue de Stassart/De Stassartstraat 35, B - 1050 Brussels, tel: (32-2) 519 68 71, fax: (32-2) 519 69 19 (http://www.cenelec.org)

ETSI: 650, route des Lucioles, F-06921 Sophia Antipolis, tel: (33) 492 94 42 12, fax: (33) 493 65 47 16 (http://www.etsi.org)

----
**UN PUBLISHED**  UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 11**  **- 10**  **47**

VANESSA POWELL

- MCCRAY , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,
v. SAM’S CLUB , Defendant

- Appellee
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina , at Greensboro
. William L. Osteen , Jr. , District Judge. ( 1:10

- cv - 00196

- WO

- PTS )

Submitted : July 28 , 2011 Decided: August 1, 2011

Before SHEDD, AGEE , and DIAZ , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion
.

Vanessa Powell

- McCray , Appellant Pro Se. Julie Kerr Adams, Angela Byrd Cummings, LITTLER MENDELSON, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Vanessa Powell

- McCray appeals (1) the dist rict court ’ s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and granting Defendant’s motion to dismiss this employment discrimination action; and (2) the court’s order denying her request to file a surreply and reaffirming the court’s order of dismissal. On appeal, we confine our review to the issues raised in the Appellant’s brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b).
Because Powell

- McCray ’ s informal brief does not challenge the district court’s conclusion that the action was time

- barred based upon her fa ilure to timely file a charge with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission , Powell

- McCray has forfeited appellate review of the order dismissing the action
. To the extent Powell

- McCray challenges the court’s denial of her request for a surreply, we hav e reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly , we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Powell

- McCray v. Sam’s Club , No. 1:10

- cv - 00196

- WO

- PTS (M.D.N.C. Dec. 14, 2010).
We deny Powell

- McCray’s motion s to appoint counsel a nd for injunctive relief. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
----

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Corte Suprema di Cassazione by order of that court of 23 June 2004 and 10 November 2004, received at the Court Registry on 31 January 2005, in the case of Reemtsma Cigarettenfabriken Gmbh against Ministero delle Finanze

(Case C-35/05)

(2005/C 93/14)

Language of the case: Italian

Reference has been made to the Court of Justice of the European Communities by order of the Corte Suprema di Cassazione (Supreme Court of Cassation, Italy) by order of 23 June 2004 and 10 November 2004, received at the Court Registry on 31 January 2005, for a preliminary ruling in the case of Reemtsma Cigarettenfabriken Gmbh against Ministero delle Finanze, on the following questions:

----

(1)OJ L 331 of 27 December 1979, p. 11.

----
I

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 4093

To secure the voting rights of former felons who have been released from

incarceration.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 18, 1994

Mr. CONYERS introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on the Judiciary

A BILL

To secure the voting rights of former felons who have been

released from incarceration.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Voting Rights of

5 Former Offenders Act’’.

6 SEC. 2. RIGHTS OF CITIZENS.

7 The right of a citizen of the United States, who other8 wise is qualified, to vote in any election for Federal office

9 shall not be denied or abridged because he has committed

10 a criminal offense unless such citizen is imprisoned in a
2

•HR 4093 IH

1 correctional institution or facility at the time of such elec2 tion.

3 SEC. 3. STATE REQUIREMENTS.

4 Nothing in this Act shall be construed to prohibit the

5 States from establishing requirements for the holding of

6 State or local elective office; nor from enacting any State

7 law which affords the right to vote in any election for Fed8 eral office on terms less restrictive than those established

9 by this Act.

10 SEC. 4. FINES.

11 Whoever shall intentionally deny or attempt to deny

12 any person any right secured by this Act shall be fined

13 not more than $500, or imprisoned not more than one

14 year, or both.

15 SEC. 5. DEFINITIONS.

16 For purposes of this Act—

17 (1) the term ‘‘correctional institution or facil18 ity’’ means any prison, penitentiary, jail, or other in19 stitution or facility for the confinement of individ20 uals convicted of criminal offenses, except that such

21 term does not include any residential community

22 treatment center (or similar public or private facil23 ity);

24 (2) the term ‘‘election’’ means (A) a general,

25 special, primary, or runoff election, (B) a convention
3

•HR 4093 IH

1 or caucus of a political party held to nominate a

2 candidate, (C) a primary election held for the selec3 tion of delegates to a national nominating conven4 tion of a political party, or (D) a primary election

5 held for the expression of a preference for the nomi6 nation of persons for election to the office of Presi7 dent; and

8 (3) the term ‘‘Federal office’’ means the office

9 of President or Vice President of the United States,

10 or of Senator or Representative in, or Delegate or

11 Resident Commissioner to, the Congress of the

12 United States.

Æ
Exhibit 10.44


PINNACLE FINANCIAL PARTNERS, INC.


Named Executive Officer Compensation Summary







The following table sets forth the current base salaries paid to the Chief Executive Officer and the four other named executive officers of Pinnacle Financial Partners, Inc. (the "Company").







	
Executive Officer

	 	
Current Base Salary

	 
	
 

	 	


	 
	
M. Terry Turner – CEO

	 	
$

	
784,000

	 
	
Robert A. McCabe, Jr. - Chairman of the Board

	 	
$

	
744,000

	 
	
Hugh M. Queener – CAO

	 	
$

	
377,000

	 
	
Harold R. Carpenter – CFO

	 	
$

	
377,000

	 
	
Joseph Harvey White - Chief Credit Officer

	 	
$

	
284,000

	 








In addition to their cash base salaries, these executive officers are also eligible to:








		-	Receive cash bonuses under the Company's 2014 Cash Incentive Plan;






		-	Participate in the Company's equity incentive programs, which currently involves the award of performance-based restricted stock units pursuant to the Company's 2004 Equity Incentive Plan; and






		-	Participate in the Company's broad-based benefit programs generally available to its employees, including health, disability and life insurance programs and the Company's 401k plan.










The foregoing information is summary in nature. Additional information regarding the named executive officer compensation will be provided in the Company's proxy statement to be filed in connection with the 2014 annual meeting of the Company's stockholders.
MONTEREY BAY UNIFIED AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DISTRICT REGULATION II PERMITS

12/13/2000 Rule 208 1 RULE 208. STANDARDS FOR GRANTING PERMITS TO OPERATE

(Adopted 9-1-74; and Repealed 12-13-2000)
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report of Azaz Capital Corp. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),I, Robert Weber, herebycertify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

 

|   | (1) | The Report fully complies  with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange  Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

|   | (2) | The information contained  in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial  condition and results of operations of the Company as of the date and for the  periods expressed in the Report. |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

| /s/ Robert Weber        |
|-------------------------|
| Robert Weber            |
| Chief Executive Officer |
|                    |
| May 23, 2011            |

 

 

 

The foregoing certification is being furnished solelypursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and is not being filed as part of the Reportor as a separate disclosure document.

 

                                                                        

----
Exhibit 31.3

CERTIFICATION OF PRESIDENT AND CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

EXCHANGE ACT RULES 13a-14(a) AND 15d-14(a),

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, David A. Campbell, certify that:

| 1. | I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of InfraREIT, Inc.; |
|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; and |
|----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 3. | Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report. |
|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

| Date: November 13, 2018 | /s/ David A. Campbell                 |
|-------------------------|---------------------------------------|
|                    | David A. Campbell                     |
|                    | President and Chief Executive Officer |
|                    | (Principal Executive Officer)         |
1100 New York Avenue Northwest

Washington, DC 20527

Office +1 202.336.8400

dfc.gov

Summary of the June 6, 2023, DFC Board of Directors Meeting

The DFC Board of Directors met at 2PM, on June 6, 2023. In attendance were: Deputy Secretary of

State Richard Verma, USAID Deputy Administrator Isobel Coleman, DFC Chief Executive Officer 

Scott Nathan, Deputy Secretary of Commerce Don Graves, Assistant Secretary for International Markets

for the Department of Treasury Alexia LaTortue, Mr. Irv Bailey, and Mr. Christopher Vincze. The 

General Session of the meeting of the Board of Directors was preceded by a public hearing. 

During the June 6, 2023 meeting, the Board heard opening remarks from CEO Scott Nathan and then a 

report from the outgoing Chief Development Officer, Andy Herscowitz. The Board adjourned to 

Executive Session and then reconvened the General Session to approve Larry Sacks as the new Chief 

Development Officer.

The Board approved transactions related to key developmental and strategic sectors and several other 

administrative matters. Finally, the Board heard updates from the Boston Consulting Group on their 

work to date in support of DFC processes and priorities and from Deputy General Counsel Dev 

Jagadesan on DFC’s Office of Accountability. Following a second Executive Session, the Board 

adjourned.
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT BY**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with this Amended Annual Report of BMB Munai, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-KSB/A-1 for the period ended March 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the *“Report”*), I, Sanat Kasymov, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 

 

|   | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

|   | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company. |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

|   |            |                                   |   |
|--------|-----------------|----------------------------------------|--------|
|   |            |                                   |   |
| Date:  | January 4, 2008 | /s/ Sanat Kasymov                      |   |
|   |            | Sanat Kasymov

Chief Financial Officer |
|   |            |                                   |   |   |
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS 

Appeal of--

Lockheed Martin Corporation 

Under Contract Nos. FA8621-06-C-6300 

F42630-99-C-0195 

APPEARANCES FOR THE APPELLANT: 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

APPEARANCES FOR THE GOVERNMENT: 

ASBCA No. 58987 

Joseph P. Homyak, Esq. 

Gregory R. Hallmark, Esq. 

Holland & Knight LLP 

Tysons Comer, VA 

E. Michael Chiaparas, Esq. 

DCMA Chief Trial Attorney 

Robert L. Duecaster, Esq. 

Trial Attorney 

Defense Contract Management Agency 

Manassas, VA 

ORDER OF DISMISSAL 

The parties have requested that proceedings in this appeal be suspended pending 

resolution of the related appeal of CAE USA, Inc., ASBCA No. 58957. A suspension of 

indeterminate duration such as that requested by the parties would preclude the Board 

from proceeding with the disposition of this appeal for an inordinate length of time. 

Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed without prejudice pursuant to Board 

Rule 30. Either party or the Board may act to reinstate this appeal regardless of the status 

of any related appeal. Unless either party or the Board acts to reinstate the appeal within 

three years from the date of this Order, the dismissal shall be deemed with prejudice. 

Dated: 7 May 2014 

Administrative Judge 

Vice Chairman 

Armed Services Board 

of Contract Appeals 
I certify that the foregoing is a true copy of the Order of Dismissal of the Armed 

Services Board of Contract Appeals in ASBCA No. 58987, Appeal of Lockheed Martin 

Corporation, rendered in conformance with the Board's Charter. 

Dated: 

2 

JEFFREYD. GARDIN 

Recorder, Armed Services 

Board of Contract Appeals
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 13-40834

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

MIGUEL ANGEL ECHEVARRIA-JIMENEZ,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 1:12-CR-962

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DENNIS, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Miguel Angel Echevarria-Jimenez (Echevarria) appeals the 57-month 

sentence imposed following his guilty plea conviction for being unlawfully 

found in the United States after deportation, having previously been convicted 

of a felony. Echevarria argues that the 16-level enhancement for being found 

in the United States after a felony drug trafficking offense was not warranted 

because his 2008 conviction for possession with intent to deliver a controlled 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

April 15, 2014

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 

 Case: 13-40834 Document: 00512597158 Page: 1 Date Filed: 04/15/2014
No. 13-40834

substance could have been charged as a misdemeanor under federal law and, 

as a result, the conviction was not a “felony” for purposes of U.S.S.G. 

§ 2L1.2(b)(1). Echevarria also argues that counsel rendered ineffective 

assistance by failing to argue that the 2008 conviction was not a felony for 

purposes of § 2L1.2(b)(1). He contends that the appeal waiver in his plea 

agreement does not preclude him from raising an ineffective assistance of 

counsel claim on direct appeal.

The Government moves for dismissal because Echevarria’s appeal is 

barred by the waiver of appeal in the plea agreement. In the alternative, the 

Government requests an extension of time to file its appellate brief.

A review of the record shows that Echevarria knowingly and voluntarily 

waived his right to appeal his sentence, see United States v. Portillo, 18 F.3d 

290, 292 (5th Cir. 1994), and that his arguments are barred by the appeal 

waiver. Therefore, the appeal is DISMISSED. The Government’s alternative 

motion to extend the time to file its brief is DENIED as moot.

2

 Case: 13-40834 Document: 00512597158 Page: 2 Date Filed: 04/15/2014
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4132 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4132

  To amend the Truth in Lending Act to provide for a cap on consumer 
                      credit card interest rates.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 24, 1994

Mr. Gejdenson introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
            Committee on Banking, Finance and Urban Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend the Truth in Lending Act to provide for a cap on consumer 
                      credit card interest rates.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Credit Card Interest Rate Cap Act of 
1994''.

SEC. 2. SENSE OF THE CONGRESS.

    It is the sense of the Congress that--
            (1) low interest rates have reduced consumer interest rates 
        for mortgages, automobiles, and certain other loans;
            (2) the same low interest rates have not led to a 
        correspondingly steep reduction in credit card interest rates; 
        and
            (3) therefore consumers are paying credit card interest 
        rates far in excess of what is warranted by economic 
        conditions.

SEC. 3. CREDIT CARD INTEREST RATE CAP.

    Section 107 of the Truth in Lending Act (15 U.S.C. 1606) is amended 
by adding at the end the following new subsection:
    ``(f) Maximum Percentage Rate To Be Established.--
            ``(1) In general.--The maximum annual percentage rate 
        applicable to any credit extended to any consumer through a 
        credit card account under any open end consumer credit plan for 
        any period during which such credit is subject to a finance 
        charge may not exceed the sum of--
                    ``(A) 9 percent; and
                    ``(B) the average annual percentage yield on 6-
                month bills issued by the Secretary of the Treasury 
                under section 3104(a) of title 31, United States Code, 
                as determined by the Board under paragraph (2) for each 
                6-month period beginning after the date this subsection 
                takes effect.
            ``(2) Regulations.--The Board shall establish, by 
        regulation, such procedures as the Board determines to be 
        appropriate to implement and administer this subsection and to 
        enforce under this title any maximum annual percentage rate 
        computed pursuant to paragraph (1).''.

                                 <all>
```