alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 31.2

                                  CERTIFICATION

I, Kamal Abdallah, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB/A of Universal Property
Development and Acquisition Corporation;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or cause such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal
quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report)
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

(b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls over
financial reporting.

Date: July 17, 2006

                                                   /s/  Kamal Abdallah
                                                   ---------------------------
                                                   Principle Financial Officer
Exhibit 32-61
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO  18 U. S. C. SECTION 1350  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 Date: February 18, 2011
    /S/ GERARD M. ANDERSONGerard M. AndersonChairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer
of The Detroit Edison Company
Exhibit 32.2

MPS GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008 of MPS Group, Inc. (the Form 10-K), I,
Robert P. Crouch, Senior Vice President, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Form 10-K fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                                          
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                          
|                                                                          
|/s/ Robert P. Crouch                                                      
|Robert P. Crouch                                                          
|Senior Vice President, Treasurer and Chief Financial
Officer March 2, 2009
I

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 4145

To require the Attorney General and the Secretary of State to designate

Ireland as a pilot program country for purposes of the visa waiver

pilot program.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 24, 1994

Mr. MCCLOSKEY (for himself, Mr. MACHTLEY, Mr. MOAKLEY, Mr. NEAL of

Massachusetts, Mr. KENNEDY, Mr. FRANK of Massachusetts, Mr. SCHUMER, Mr. QUINN, Mr. WALSH, Mr. APPLEGATE, Mr. CALVERT, Mr. CONYERS, Mr. COYNE, Mr. GILMAN, Mrs. MALONEY, Mr. MANTON, and Ms.

MOLINARI) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on the Judiciary

A BILL

To require the Attorney General and the Secretary of State

to designate Ireland as a pilot program country for purposes of the visa waiver pilot program.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. CONGRESSIONAL FINDINGS.

4 The Congress finds that—

5 (1) Ireland and the United States have close

6 cultural and historical ties;
2

•HR 4145 IH

1 (2) citizens of Ireland who have entered the

2 United States on nonimmigrant visas have dem3 onstrated exemplary overstay rates of 0.08 percent

4 in 1992 and 1.2 percent in 1991;

5 (3) the overstay rates of citizens of Ireland who

6 enter the United States on nonimmigrant visas are

7 comparable to the overstay rates of citizens of the

8 Western European countries that are currently des9 ignated as pilot program countries for purposes of

10 the visa waiver pilot program described in section

11 217 of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8

12 U.S.C. 1187); and

13 (4) citizens of the United States are able to

14 enter Ireland without obtaining nonimmigrant visas,

15 while citizens of Ireland do not receive the same

16 privilege regarding entry into the United States.

17 SEC. 2. DESIGNATION OF IRELAND AS VISA WAIVER PILOT

18 PROGRAM COUNTRY.

19 (a) IN GENERAL.—The Attorney General and the

20 Secretary of State shall jointly designate Ireland as a pilot

21 program country under section 217(c)(1) of the Immigra22 tion and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1187(c)(1)) for pur23 poses of the visa waiver pilot program described in section

24 217 of such Act.
3

•HR 4145 IH

1 (b) REQUIREMENTS APPLICABLE TO CONTINUING

2 QUALIFICATION.—The provisions of section 217(c)(3)(A)

3 of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C.

4 1187(c)(3)(A)) shall apply to the qualification of Ireland

5 for designation as a pilot program country for each fiscal

6 year after the fiscal year for which the designation re7 quired by subsection (a) is made.

Æ
**Exhibit 31.1**
**CERTIFICATION**
I, Elwood G. Norris, certify that: 
       

1.

I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K/A of American TechnologyCorporation; 

 

2.

Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statementof a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements weremade, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report;

 

3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects thefinancial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant asof, and for, the periods presented in this annual report; 

 

4.

The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 
  
a)

designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure thatmaterial information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this annual report is being prepared; 
  
b)

[paragraph omitted pursuant to SEC Release Nos. 33-2838 and 34-47986]
  
c)

evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectivenessof the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period coveredby this report based on such evaluation;

 
 
d)

disclosed in this annual report any change in the registrant's internal controlover financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recentfiscal quarter, which is the registrant's forth fiscal quarter, that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant's internal control over financial reporting.
 
5.

The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on ourmost recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors(or persons performing the equivalent functions): 
  
a)

all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operationof internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and 

 
 
b)

any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employeeswho have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls over financialreporting. 

Dated: January 28, 2004 

 

/s/ ELWOOD G. NORRIS

 

Elwood G. Norris,Chairman of the Board(Principal Executive Officer)
<PAGE>

                                                                       Exh. 99.4

                                  [LETTERHEAD]


                                 August 25, 2000


TO: The Unsecured Creditors of CRIIMI MAE Management, Inc.

    RE:  IN RE CRIIMI MAE INC., CRIIMI MAE MANAGEMENT INC., AND
         CRIIMI MAE HOLDINGS II, L.P.
         BANKRUPTCY CASE NOS. 98-23115-DK THROUGH 98-23117-DK
         CHAPTER 11 (JOINTLY ADMINISTERED)

Dear Creditor:

    We are counsel to the Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors of CRIIMI
MAE Management, Inc. (the "Creditors' Committee"), and I am writing on behalf
of the Creditors' Committee to recommend that you vote to accept the Debtors'
Third Amended Joint Plan of Reorganization (the "Plan"). A ballot of your
vote is enclosed with the Plan.

    During the pendency of the debtors' bankruptcy cases, the Creditors'
Committee has played an active role in representing the interests of the
unsecured creditors of CRIIMI MAE Management, Inc. In so doing, the
Creditors' Committee has participated in ongoing negotiations with the
debtors, the Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors of CRIIMI MAE Inc. and
the Official Committee of Equity Holders of the debtors to ensure the rights
of unsecured creditors of CRIIMI MAE Management are protected. The Creditors'
Committee's goal has been to secure from the debtors payment in full to the
unsecured creditors of CRIIMI MAE Management, Inc. upon confirmation of any
plan of reorganization.

    With this in mind, the Creditors' Committee is now seeking your support
for confirmation of the Plan, because the Plan proposes to repay the allowed
claims of the unsecured creditors of CRIIMI MAE Management, Inc. in full and
in cash, with requisite interest. The Creditors' Committee therefore believes
that it is the best interest of the unsecured creditors to vote to accept the
Plan, and I urge you to do so.

    You should have already received copies of the Plan and the accompanying
Court approved Disclosure Statement, which I suggest you review carefully to
fully understand the treatment of your claims. While I am not permitted to
make any disclosures to you that are not

<PAGE>

August 25, 2000
Page 2

otherwise approved in the Plan and Disclosure Statement, I am more than happy
to answer any of your questions. You may reach me at the above-listed number.

                                       Very truly yours,

                                       /s/ Paul M. Nussbaum

                                       Paul M. Nussbaum
103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 3982

AN ACT

To amend the Marine Protection, Research, and Sanctuaries

Act of 1972 to prohibit the ocean dumping of radioactive

waste.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Ocean Radioactive

5 Dumping Ban Act of 1994’’.

6 SEC. 2. AMENDMENTS TO THE OCEAN DUMPING ACT.

7 The Marine Protection, Research, and Sanctuaries

8 Act of 1972 (33 U.S.C. 1401 et seq.) is amended—

9 (1) in section 3 (33 U.S.C. 1402), by—

10 (A) striking paragraph (j); and
2

HR 3982 EH

1 (B) redesignating the following paragraphs

2 accordingly;

3 (2) by altering any reference to the paragraphs

4 redesignated under paragraph (1) of this Act;

5 (3) in section 102(a) (33 U.S.C. 1412(a)), by

6 striking ‘‘high-level’’ before ‘‘radioactive waste’’; and

7 (4) in section 104 (33 U.S.C. 1414), by striking

8 subsection (i).

9 SEC. 3. CLARIFICATION.

10 Nothing in this Act shall affect the transportation of

11 material containing de minimis levels of radioactivity for

12 the purpose of dumping it into ocean waters under the

13 Marine Protection, Research, and Sanctuaries Act of

14 1972.

Passed the House of Representatives May 23, 1994.

Attest:

Clerk.
3

HR 3982 EH
103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 3982

AN ACT

To amend the Marine Protection, Research, and

dumping of radioactive waste.Sanctuaries Act of 1972 to prohibit the ocean
### T E X A S C O U R T O F A P P E A L S , T H I R D D I S T R I C T , A T A U S T I N

NO. 03-16-00533- CV

In re Leonard Shan e P rudhomm e

ORI GINAL P ROCEEDI NG F ROM TRAVIS CO UNTY

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N
Relator L eonar d Shane Prudhomme filed his petition for writ of m an d am u s , challeng ing the trial court’s denial of his plea to the jurisdiction in a child-custody suit. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.1. Having revie wed the pe tition, t he rec ord, and the response , we deny the petition for writ of mandamus. See Tex. R. App. P . 52.8.

Whil e rela tor’s petition was pending , the rea l party in in te r e s t, K im

b erly Prudhomme, filed a Motion to Str i k e an d for Sanctions, reque sting that this Court strike documents in the mandamus re cord a

nd impose sanctions on rela tor. Be cause we deny rela tor’s petit ion for writ of mandamus, we dismiss rea l party in interest’s motion to strike as moot. We further deny rea l party in interest’s motion for sanc tions.

__________________________________________ Cindy Olson Bour land, J ustice Be fore Chief J ustice Rose, Jus tices Goodwin a nd Bour land Filed: Aug ust 31, 2016
COURT OF A PPEAL S EI GHTH D I STRI CT OF TEX AS ELPASO, TEXAS

WI L BU R G. METZ , Appellant,

v. MAURI CE W. S UL L I VAN AN D KATHRYN G . CROSBY, TRUSTEES OF THE SUL L I VAN/CROSBY TRUST, Appellee s. § § § § § § No. 08-09-00294- CV

Appea l from County Court at L aw No 5 of El Paso County , Texas (TC # 2008-4055)

MEMORAN DUM OP INION
T h is appea l is befor e the Court on its own motion to deter mine whether it s h o u l d b e dismiss ed. Be cause Appellant has not filed a brief or a motion for extension of time, we dismiss the
appea l for wa

nt of prosec ution. On Marc h 24, 2011, the Clerk of this Court notified Appellant that his brief was past due and that no motion for extension of time had been rec eived. The Clerk also informed the parties of the Court’s intent to dismiss the appea l f or want of prosec ution unless, within ten day s of the notice, a party responde d showing g rounds to continue the appea l. To this date, no one has responde d to the Clerk’s letter

. This Court has the authority to dismiss an appea l for want of prosec ution when the appellant has failed to file his brief in the time presc ribed and g ives no rea sonable explanation for the failure
to do so. T E X .R.A P P .P. 38.8(a) (1); Elizondo v. City of San Antonio , 975 S.W .2d 61, 63 (Tex.App.-- San Antonio 1998, no pet.). Ac cording ly , we dismiss the appea l for wa nt of prosec ution.May

11, 2011 ANN CRAWFORD McCL URE, J ustice
Be fore Chew, C.J ., McClure, a nd Rivera, JJ

.
EXHIBIT 32





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350





In connection with the quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Eastern Acquisition Corporation (the "Company") for the quarter ended September 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Joseph Rozelle, President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge that:





1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








Date: November 23, 2010





/s/ Joseph RozelleJoseph Rozelle

President

(Principal Executive and Financial Officer)











The foregoing certification is being furnished as an exhibit to the Report pursuant to Item 601(b)(32) of Regulation S-K and  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code) and, accordingly, is not being filed as part of the Report for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not incorporated by reference into any filings of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

ACME ENERGY SERVICES, INC. d/b/a

RIG MOVERS EXPRESS,

Appellant,

v.

SANDRA H. STALEY, INDIVIDUALLY

AS INDEPENDENT EXECUTRIX OF

THE ESTATE OF GEORGE G. STALEY,

DECEASED, AND AS TRUSTEE OF

THE TAX FREE TRUST FOR SANDRA

H. STALEY,

Appellee. §

§

§

§

§

§

§

§ No. 08

- 17

- 00148

- CV

Appeal from the

109th District Court

of Winkler County, Texas

(TC# 15,687

– B)

J U D G M E N T

The Court has considered this cause on the record and concludes there was no error in the

judgment. We therefore affirm the judgment of the court below . We further order that Appellee

recover from Appellant and its sureties, if any, see T EX .R.A PP .P. 43.5, on the judgment and all

costs of this appeal, for which let execution issue. This decision shall be certified below for

observance.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 22ND DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2019.

YVONNE T. RODRIGUEZ, Justice

Before Rodriguez, J., Palafox, J., and Larsen, Senior Judge

Larsen, Senior Judge (Sitting by Assignment)
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FIFTH DISTRICT

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

 FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

MARCIAL GARCIA and

MARTINA GARCIA,

Appellants,

v. Case No. 5D15-1628

TOWER HILL SIGNATURE 

INSURANCE COMPANY,

Appellee.

________________________________/

Opinion filed October 21, 2016

Appeal from the Circuit Court 

for Hernando County,

Richard Tombrink, Jr., Judge.

Timothy W. Weber, and Joseph P. Kenny, 

of Weber, Crabb & Wein, P.A., St. 

Petersburg, for Appellants.

Scot E. Samis and Ashley R. Kellgren, of 

Traub, Lieberman Straus & Shrewsberry, 

LLP, St. Petersburg, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Marcial and Martina Garcia appeal the trial court's final judgment in favor of Tower 

Hill Signature Insurance Company, which, despite initially denying the Garcias' sinkhole 

claim, ultimately extended coverage after the Garcias filed suit and a neutral evaluator 

confirmed the sinkhole damage. In finding that Tower Hill’s initial denial of coverage did 
2

not breach the Garcias’ insurance policy, the trial court correctly applied then-binding 

precedent recently disapproved by the Florida Supreme Court in Johnson v. Omega Ins. 

Co., 41 Fla. L. Weekly S415 (Fla. Sept. 29, 2016). As such, we reverse the final judgment 

and remand for further proceedings consistent with Johnson.

REVERSED and REMANDED with INSTRUCTIONS.

LAWSON, C.J., TORPY and WALLIS, JJ., concur.
I

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 4127

To require the Secretary of the Treasury to biannually pay to State and

local governments compensation for direct costs incurred by those governments in complying with Federal mandates.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 24, 1994

Mr. BARCA of Wisconsin (for himself, Mr. HANSEN, Mr. THOMAS of Wyoming,

Mr. CONDIT, and Mr. PETERSON of Minnesota) introduced the following

bill; which was referred to the Committee on Government Operations

A BILL

To require the Secretary of the Treasury to biannually pay

to State and local governments compensation for direct

costs incurred by those governments in complying with

Federal mandates.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Federal Mandate

5 Compensation Act’’.
2

•HR 4127 IH

1 SEC. 2. REQUIREMENT TO BIANNUALLY PAY COMPENSA2 TION FOR COSTS INCURRED BY STATE AND

3 LOCAL GOVERNMENTS IN COMPLYING WITH

4 FEDERAL MANDATES.

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of the Treasury

6 shall biannually—

7 (1) determine the costs incurred in the preced8 ing 6 months by each State government and each

9 local government as a direct result of complying with

10 Federal mandates; and

11 (2) pay to each State government and each

12 local government an amount adequate to compensate

13 the government for the portion of the costs deter14 mined under paragraph (1) for the government for

15 which the government is not otherwise compensated

16 by the Federal Government.

17 (b) FEDERAL MANDATE DEFINED.—In this Act, the

18 term ‘‘Federal mandate’’ means any requirement that a

19 State government or local government conduct an activity

20 (including a requirement to meet national standards in

21 providing a service), under a Federal statute or regulation

22 that takes effect on or after the date of the enactment

23 of this Act.

Æ