alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
MEMORANDUM FOR DFAS

SUBJECT: STATEMENT IN LIEU OF ACTUAL RECEIPTS

I, DO HEREBY CERTIFY BY THIS STATEMENT THAT 

RECEIPTS FOR THE FOLLOWING TRAVEL EXPENSES WERE EITHER 

INADVERTANTLY MISLPLACED, LOST, OR DESTROYED AND HEREBY CLAIM THE 

FOLLOWING AMOUNT OF $ WHICH CONSISTS OF THE FOLLOWING:

TRANSPORTATION:____________

AIRFARE: ____________ NAME OF AIRLINE _

ITINERARY: 

DEPARTING LOCATION: ________________________________________________________

ADDITONAL STOPS (IF APPLICABLE):____________________________________________

DESTINATION: _________________________________________________________________

RENTAL VEHICLE: _____________

 

NAME OF COMPANY ____________________________________

TYPE OF VEHICLE RENTED

MISCELLANEOUS: ___________________

(PLEASE LIST)

___________________________________________________________________

___________________________________________________________________

I ALSO CERTIFY THAT NO HIDDEN CHARGES OR CLAIMS ARE ADDED INTO THESE 

COSTS.

SIGNED: _________

DATE: _________
EXHIBIT 31.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

I, Nicholas Radesca, Chief Financial Officer of
Solar Senior Capital Ltd., certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Solar Senior Capital Ltd.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material
fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all
material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for
the registrant and have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which
this report is being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the
registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over
financial reporting; and

5. The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.

Dated this 1stday of May, 2012



|                       
|-----------------------
|                       
|/S/    NICHOLAS
RADESCA
|Nicholas Radesca
% Food exposure 
% Once daily oral exposure, dose from cpfs SS F13_49 foodonly exp distribution.csv 99.9th percentile  
% Female adult, Body weight set to 72.9 kg
% Cecilia Tan
% August 25, 2015

prepare @clear @all
% Setting model parameters
start @NoCallback
use human_parameters_MRP
use preg_female_parameters

BWSW=1;		% Set to 1 if BWT is provided
BWST=72.9;	% Initial BW in kg
PREG=0;		% Not pregnant
TSTOP= 1008; 	% Exposure duration in hrs

%Single daily oral exposure
DT = xlsRead("Food.xls", "999p", "A1:A43"); % Dosing Times
DORAL=xlsRead("Food.xls", "999p", "B1:B43"); % Dose in ug/kg 
prepare time rbcce cv urinetcpy
start@nocallback

% Output RBC AChE, urine TCpy, venous blood conc of chlorpyrifos, in ug/L
mytable = [_time _rbcce _urinetcpy _cv*350.6];
save mytable @file='food_999.txt' @format=ascii

min(_rbcce)		% display peak RBC AChE inhibition
#### George Jones, Appellant, v Martin Bodian et al., Respondents.

In an action to recover damages for medical malpractice, the plaintiff appeals from (1) an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Scholnick, J.), dated August 9, 1989, which granted the motion of the defendant Brookdale Hospital Medical Center and the separate motion of the defendants Martin Bodian, M.D., and Steven Divack, M.D., to dismiss the complaint for failure to comply with CPLR 3012-a, (2) an order of the same court, also dated August 9, 1989, which denied the plaintiff’s motion to strike the answer of the defendant doctors for failure to appear at depositions, and (3) a judgment of the same court dated September 22, 1989, which dismissed the action against all the defendants.

Ordered that the appeals from the orders are dismissed; and it is further,

Ordered that the judgment is reversed, on the law; and it is further,

Ordered that the orders dated August 9, 1989, are vacated, the separate motions to dismiss the complaint are denied, and the matter is remitted to the Supreme Court, Kings County, *496for further proceedings in accordance herewith; and it is further,

Ordered that the plaintiffs are awarded one bill of costs payable by the respondent appearing separately and filing separate briefs.

The appeals from the intermediate orders must be dismissed because the right of direct appeal therefrom terminated with the entry of judgment in the action *(see, Matter of Aho,*39 NY2d 241, 248). The issues raised on the appeals from the orders are brought up for review and have been considered on the appeal from the judgment (CPLR 5501 [a] [1]).

In *Kolb v Strogh*(158 AD2d 15), this court abandoned the position originally adopted in the case of *Santangelo v Raskin*(137 AD2d 74) and held "that neither statute nor rule authorizes dismissal of the action as a sanction for a violation of CPLR 3012-a” *(see, Kolb v Strogh, supra,*at 16). Accordingly, the judgment dismissing the complaint on the basis that the plaintiff has failed to comply with CPLR 3012-a must be reversed. The plaintiff’s certificate of merit dated March 1, 1989, shall be deemed served and filed.

The order denying as moot the plaintiff’s motion to strike the defendant doctors’ answer for failure to disclose must be vacated. Since the Supreme Court did not consider the merits of that motion, the matter is remitted for further consideration and for the issuance of such orders as it deems appropriate to compel the parties to complete their disclosure. Thompson, J. P., Eiber, Balletta and O’Brien, JJ., concur.
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

In connectionwith the Annual Report of Miller Industries, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Kfor the period ending December 31, 2004 filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Jeffrey I. Badgley, Presidentand Co-Chief Executive Officer of  the Company, certify, pursuant to 18U.S.C. § 1350 as adopted by § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,that:

(1)           TheReport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)           Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated:  March 14,2005
EXHIBIT
32.1

CERTIFICATION
OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL

OFFICER
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the Report of Pacific Quest Ventures Corp. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended
March 31, 2013 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, William
Tay, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:



|(1) | The Report
    fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information
    contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
    Company.
|--- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



By:
/s/ William Tay

William
Tay, President, Secretary and

Principal
Financial Officer

Dated:
April 22, 2013
#### In the Matter of Michael Nicoletti, Appellant, v New York State Department of Taxation and Finance, Respondent.

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court (Prior, Jr., J.), entered February 8, 1990 in Albany County, which, in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, granted respondent’s motion to dismiss the petition as time barred.

Petitioner admitted that upon receipt of the notices for payment of sales and use taxes, which were dated December 29, 1987, he "did nothing” until July 1988 when he received a collection notice from respondent. His letter requesting an administrative hearing was dated July 25, 1988 and was therefore well past the 90-day time period for requests for review provided by Tax Law § 1138 (a) (1) *(see, Matter of Halperin v Chu,*138 AD2d 915, *lv dismissed, lv denied*72 NY2d 938). On October 20, 1989, approximately 22 months after the notices of payment were issued, petitioner commenced this proceeding. This exceeded the four-month Statute of Limitations provided by CPLR 217. Even if it is accepted that petitioner did not have to exhaust his administrative remedies, he still failed to timely commence the instant proceeding *(see, Matter of West Mountain Corp. v State of N. Y. Dept. of Taxation & Fin.,*105 AD2d 989, *affd*64 NY2d 991). Accordingly, the proceeding was properly dismissed as time barred. Petitioner’s remaining contentions have been considered and found to be lacking in merit.

Judgment affirmed, without costs. Mahoney, P. J., Mikoll, Levine, Crew III and Harvey, JJ., concur.
** We will require United to begin its second daily San Francisco-Shanghai service, with the seven 

frequencies awarded by Notice of Action Taken dated November 21, 2014, no later than July 15, 2015. 

We acted on this motion without awaiting expiration of the answer period with the consent of all parties 

served with the request.

Approved under assigned authority on

April 1, 2015**

Director, Office of International Aviation
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

MYRON PUKOWSKY,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 3 MAL 2020

Petition for Allowance of Appeal

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 5th day of May, 2020

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED

.
Exhibit 32.1





Certification of Principal Executive Officer


Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to


Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of China Renewable Construction Materials Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"), I, Chi Wu, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Date: August 22, 2011

/s/ Chi WuChi WuPrincipal Executive Officer
II 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 629 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to recognize the service in the 

reserve components of the Armed Forces of certain persons by honoring 

them with status as veterans under law, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 20, 2013 

Mr. PRYOR (for himself, Mr. BOOZMAN, Mr. TESTER, Mr. GRASSLEY, Mr. 

LEAHY, Mr. JOHNSON of South Dakota, Mr. HARKIN, Mr. BEGICH, Mr. 

FRANKEN, and Mr. WYDEN) introduced the following bill; which was read 

twice and referred to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to recognize the 

service in the reserve components of the Armed Forces 

of certain persons by honoring them with status as veterans under law, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Honor America’s 

5 Guard-Reserve Retirees Act of 2013’’. 


srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 629 IS

1 SEC. 2. PROVISION OF STATUS UNDER LAW BY HONORING 

2 CERTAIN MEMBERS OF THE RESERVE COM3 PONENTS OF THE ARMED FORCES AS VET4 ERANS. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Chapter 1 of title 38, United 

6 States Code, is amended by inserting after section 107 the 

7 following new section: 

8 ‘‘§ 107A. Honoring as veterans certain persons who 

9 performed service in the reserve compo10 nents 

11 ‘‘Any person who is entitled under chapter 1223 of 

12 title 10 to retired pay for nonregular service or, but for 

13 age, would be entitled under such chapter to retired pay 

14 for nonregular service shall be honored as a veteran but 

15 shall not be entitled to any benefit by reason of this sec16 tion.’’. 

17 (b) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections 

18 at the beginning of such chapter is amended by inserting 

19 after the item relating to section 107 the following new 

20 item: 

‘‘107A. Honoring as veterans certain persons who performed service in the reserve components.’’. 

Æ 


srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
<PAGE>



                                                                   Exhibit 10.24

                          AMENDMENT TO PROMISSORY NOTES
                          DEFERRAL OF INTEREST PAYMENTS

         THIS AMENDMENT TO PROMISSORY NOTES (the "Amendment") is made effective
as of the 31st day of December 2001, by and among Glastad Holding Ltd., a Cayman
Islands corporation (the "Lender") and MediaBin, Inc., a Georgia corporation
(the "Borrower").

                              W I T N E S S E T H:
                              - - - - - - - - - -

         WHEREAS, Lender is the holder of certain Promissory Notes from
Borrower, as listed below ("Notes"):

     o  Note dated March 23, 2000, in the principal amount of $1,000,000;

     o  Note dated October 11, 2000, in the principal amount of $750,000; and

     o  Note dated June 21, 2001, in the principal amount of $750,000; and

         WHEREAS, Lender and Borrower wish to amend the Notes as hereinafter
provided;

         NOW, THEREFORE, for and in consideration of the mutual agreements
herein contained and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and
sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, Lender and Borrower hereby agree
as follows:

         "The interest payment due upon each of the above Notes on December 31,
         2001, including interest previously deferred, totals approximately
         $90,000, will be deferred until March 31, 2002. The interest deferred
         will be added to the principal balance of each Note and will accrue
         interest at the same rate as the rest of the principal."

         All references in the Notes to this "Note" shall hereafter refer to the
Notes as hereby amended.

         Except as expressly provided herein, all terms and conditions of the
Notes remain in full force and effect. Nothing herein shall be construed to
constitute a novation of the Notes, and the intention of the parties hereto is
not to extinguish the Notes.

<PAGE>

         This Amendment shall be construed in accordance with the laws of the
State of Georgia.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Borrower and Lender have caused this Amendment to
be executed, as of the date first above written.


BORROWER:                                   LENDER:

MEDIABIN, INC.                              GLASTAD HOLDING, LTD.

By:   /s/ Haines Hargrett                   By:   /s/ Patrick Stephansen
     ---------------------------------         ---------------------------------

     Name:                                     Name:
           ---------------------------              ----------------------------
     Title:                                    Title:
            --------------------------               ---------------------------
     Date:                                     Date:
           ---------------------------               ---------------------------
#### Racquel Zucker, Respondent, v 1255 Hewlett Plaza Realty Co., Appellant, et al., Defendant.

In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant 1255 Hewlett Plaza Realty Co. appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Roberto, J.), dated July 21, 1989, which denied its motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as it is asserted against it.

Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, without costs *518or disbursements, the motion is granted, the complaint is dismissed insofar as it is asserted against the appellant, and the action against the remaining defendant is severed.

It is well established that a landowner will not be liable to a pedestrian injured by a defect in a public sidewalk abutting the landowner’s premises, unless the landowner created the defective condition, or caused the defect to occur because of some special use, or unless a statute or ordinance placed the obligation to maintain the sidewalk upon the landowner *(see, Surowiec v City of New York,*139 AD2d 727; *Kaszovitz v Weiszman,*110 AD2d 117; *Lodato v Town of Oyster Bay,*68 AD2d 904). In the case at bar, there was absolutely no evidence to show that the appellant either created the allegedly defective condition, or that it caused any defect to occur because of a special use, or was obligated by statute or ordinance to maintain the sidewalk. Bracken, J. P., Kooper, Lawrence, Balletta and O’Brien, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 32.1 Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350) In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2017 (the Report) of GSV Capital Corp. (the Registrant), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Michael T. Moe, the Chief Executive Officer of the Registrant, hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge, that: (1)

          The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and (2)

          The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant. /s/ Michael T. MoeName:Michael T. MoeDate: August 9, 2017
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 12.1

                      SECURITY CAPITAL GROUP INCORPORATED
               COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES

                         (DOLLAR AMOUNTS IN THOUSANDS)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                         Year Ended December 31,
                                      -------------------------------------------------------------
                                         2000        1999         1998         1997         1996
                                      ---------    ---------    ---------    ---------    ---------
<S>                                   <C>          <C>          <C>          <C>          <C>
Earnings (loss) from Operations       $ 434,689    $(134,135)   $(156,351)   $  80,732    $  84,128
Less: Equity in earnings from
   equity investees                    (369,045)     (78,899)      71,950     (170,576)    (168,473)
Add: Dividends received from
   equity investees                     147,005      150,756      144,757      110,082       74,652
Other                                        --        2,612        7,124       18,003           --
                                      ---------    ---------    ---------    ---------    ---------
Net earnings (loss) from Operations     212,649      (59,666)      67,480       38,241       (9,693)
Add:
   Interest Expense                     108,558      133,454       82,203      104,434      117,224
                                      ---------    ---------    ---------    ---------    ---------

Earnings as Adjusted                  $ 321,207    $  73,788    $ 149,683    $ 142,675    $ 107,531
                                      =========    =========    =========    =========    =========

Fixed Charges:
   Interest Expense                   $ 108,558    $ 133,454    $  82,203    $ 104,434    $ 117,224
   Capitalized Interest                   3,192        8,209       26,703       69,883       11,448
                                      ---------    ---------    ---------    ---------    ---------

   Total Fixed Charges                $ 111,750    $ 141,663    $ 108,906    $ 174,317    $ 128,672
                                      =========    =========    =========    =========    =========

Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges          2.9          0.5          1.4          0.8          0.8
                                      =========    =========    =========    =========    =========
</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 4.5.8  AGREEMENT TO CONVERT CONVERTIBLE SUBORDINATED NOTE TO SHARES OF THE COMPANYS COMMON STOCK
RENE LARRAVE



December 19, 2003



Mr. Jason K. Wadzinski

President/CEO

Advant-e Corporation

2680 Indian Ripple Road

Dayton, OH 45440



Mr. Wadzinski,



This letter is to inform you of my request to convert $50,000 of the Convertible Subordinated Note dated July 9, 2002 that J bold into common stock of Advant-e Corporation.



Based on the conversion price of $1.10 per share, I am expecting to be issued 45,455 shares
of Advant-e Common Stock as per the Note Purchase Agreement dated July 9, 2002.



As of January 3, 2004 when the note is due, there will be $1,361 of accrued interest that I would like paid in cash.



I will forward to you the original Convertible Subordinated Note as per the terms of the Note Purchase Agreement.



Sincerely,



|            
|------------
|            
|            
|            
|Rene Larrave



48
›· ̈ø ̈·±2Ê ÈÎ ⁄aoÚ Œa1Ú ÈÔÍÈÍ ÓðÔð 

›±2 ̈a2 ̈ o±©2¥±øoaoÒ°Æ·2 ̈ao oÆ±3 

ÿa·2—2¥·2a  ̄ ̧ ̈ ̈°ÊÒÒ ̧a·2±2¥·2aÚ±Æ1 ̃

⁄Æ· —1⁄2 ̈ Ó ÔÍÊÎÎÊÏÏ ÓðÔÎ

ÛÛ «± ́Æ  ́­a ±o  ̈ ̧·­ ÿa·2—2¥·2a –‹⁄ ·2o·1⁄2ø ̈a­ ß± ́Æ ø1⁄21⁄2a° ̈ø21⁄2a

±o ÿa·2—2¥·2a ̆­ ÃaÆ3­ ø2o ›±2o· ̈·±2­ ±o  ̈ ̧a ¥·1⁄2a2­a

ø1Æaa3a2 ̈ øTMø·¥øæ¥a ø ̈  ̧ ̈ ̈°ÊÒÒ ̧a·2±2¥·2aÚ±Æ1Òÿ—‘Ò‘·1⁄2a2­a

ÛÛ Ã ̧a ­aøÆ1⁄2 ̧  ̈a® ̈ ±o  ̈ ̧·­ –‹⁄ ·­ 1a2aÆø ̈ao oÆ±3 

 ́21⁄2±ÆÆa1⁄2 ̈ao —›Œ  ̈a® ̈Ú