alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Justice

###### Antitrust Division

                    Notice is hereby given that, on August 17, 2018, pursuant to Section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301*et seq.*                     (“the Act”), Southwest Research Institute—Cooperative Research Group on ROS-Industrial Consortium-Americas (“RIC-Americas”) has filed written notifications simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing changes in its membership. The notifications were filed for the purpose of extending the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances. Specifically, National Oilwell Varco L.P., Houston, TX, has been added as a party to this venture.                

No other changes have been made in either the membership or planned activity of the group research project. Membership in this group research project remains open and RIC-Americas intends to file additional written notifications disclosing all changes in membership or planned activities.

                    On April 30, 2014, RIC-Americas filed its original notification pursuant to Section 6(a) of the Act. The Department of Justice published a notice in the                     **Federal Register**                     pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act on June 9, 2014 (79 FR 32999).                

                    The last notification was filed with the Department on July 11, 2018. A notice was published in the                     **Federal Register**                     pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act on August 6, 2018 (83 FR 38324).                

Suzanne Morris,

Chief, Premerger and Division Statistics Unit, Antitrust Division.

[FR Doc. 2018-19071 Filed 8-31-18; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE 4410-11-P
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION



Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002

(subsections (a) and
(b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code)



Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), the undersigned officer of LVFAR
Green Technology Corp., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), does hereby certify, to such officer’s knowledge,
that:



The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the
quarter ended January 31, 2013 (the “Form 10-Q”) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|Dated: March 14, 2013 | By: | /s/ Peter H. Tong                         
|--------------------- | --- | ------------------------------------------
|                      |     | Peter H. Tong, Chief Executive Officer and
|                      |     | Chief Financial Officer                   



The foregoing certification is being furnished
solely pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title
18, United States Code) and is not being filed as part of Form 10-Q or as a separate disclosure document.



A signed original of this written statement
required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NO. WR-83,155-02

EX PARTE JUAN FRANCISCO TURCIOS, Applicant

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

CAUSE NO. W11-70896-P(A) IN THE 203RD DISTRICT COURT

FROM DALLAS COUNTY

Per curiam.

O R D E R

Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the

clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte

Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of aggravated

assault and sentenced to twenty years’ imprisonment. The Fifth Court of Appeals affirmed his

conviction. Turcios v. State, 05-12-00840-CR (Tex. App.—Dallas Oct. 7, 2013) (not designated for

publication).

Applicant contends, among other things, that trial counsel rendered ineffective assistance. 

The trial court entered an order designating issues, and the Dallas County District Clerk forwarded
2

this application because the trial court did not make findings of fact and conclusions of law within

181 days of the State’s receipt of this application. TEX. R. APP. P. 73.4(b)(5). 

Applicant has alleged facts that, if true, might entitle him to relief. Strickland v. Washington,

466 U.S. 668 (1984); Ex parte Patterson, 993 S.W.2d 114, 115 (Tex. Crim. App. 1999). In these

circumstances, additional facts are needed. As we held in Ex parte Rodriguez, 334 S.W.2d 294, 294

(Tex. Crim. App. 1960), the trial court is the appropriate forum for findings of fact. The trial court

shall order trial counsel to respond to Applicant’s ineffective assistance of counsel claims. The trial

court may use any means set out in TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. art. 11.07, § 3(d).

If the trial court elects to hold a hearing, it shall determine whether Applicant is indigent. 

If Applicant is indigent and wishes to be represented by counsel, the trial court shall appoint an

attorney to represent him at the hearing. TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. art. 26.04. 

Afterreviewing counsel’sresponse,the trial court shall make findings of fact and conclusions

of law as to whether counsel’s conduct was deficient and Applicant was prejudiced. The trial court

shall also make any other findings of fact and conclusions of law that it deems relevant and

appropriate to the disposition of Applicant’s claims for habeas corpus relief.

This application will be held in abeyance until the trial court has resolved the fact issues. The

issues shall be resolved within 90 days of this order. A supplemental transcript containing all

affidavits and interrogatories or the transcription of the court reporter’s notes from any hearing or

deposition, along with the trial court’s supplemental findings of fact and conclusions of law, shall

be forwarded to this Court within 120 days of the date of this order. Any extensions of time shall

be obtained from this Court.

Filed: July 29, 2015

Do not publish
**EXHIBIT 23.1**

 

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS**

 

We have issued our report dated February 27, 2004, accompanying the consolidated financial statements included in the AnnualReport of OSE USA, Inc. (formerly Integrated Packaging Assembly Corporation) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003. We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of said report in the Registration Statements of OSE USA, Inc.(formerly Integrated Packaging Assembly Corporation) on Form S-8 (Numbers 333-49365, 333-30457, 333-05571 and 333-88341). 

 

/s/    GRANT THORNTON LLP 

 

San Jose, California 

February 27, 2004
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4041 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4041

  To amend the District of Columbia Self-Government and Governmental 
   Reorganization Act to provide for the appointment of the ranking 
 members of the Committee on the District of Columbia of the House of 
 Representatives and the Subcommittee on General Services, Federalism, 
 and the District of Columbia of the Committee on Governmental Affairs 
       of the Senate to the National Capital Planning Commission.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 16, 1994

Mr. Bliley (for himself, Mr. Rohrabacher, Mr. Paxon, and Mr. Ballenger) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                        the District of Columbia

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend the District of Columbia Self-Government and Governmental 
   Reorganization Act to provide for the appointment of the ranking 
 members of the Committee on the District of Columbia of the House of 
 Representatives and the Subcommittee on General Services, Federalism, 
 and the District of Columbia of the Committee on Governmental Affairs 
       of the Senate to the National Capital Planning Commission.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. APPOINTMENT OF RANKING MEMBERS OF DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA 
              COMMITTEES TO NATIONAL CAPITAL PLANNING COMMISSION.

    (a) In General.--Section 2(b) of the Act entitled ``An Act 
providing for a comprehensive development of the park and playground 
system of the National Capital, approved June 6, 1924 (sec. 1-2002(b), 
D.C. Code), is amended by inserting ``and ranking members'' after 
``chairmen''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) shall 
take effect 30 days after the date of the enactment of this Act.

                                 <all>
```
BEFORE THE 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

WASHINGTON. D.C. 

Agreemente Adopted by the Traffic 

Conferences of the International Air 

Transport Association 

OST-2009-0343 

APPLICATION FOR APPROVAL OF AGREEMENTS 

BY THE 

INTERNATIONAL AIR TRANSPORT ASSOCIATION 

NTAPPROVtiD&IMMUNIZliU 

O ^ . OSV 3 kC • DATE _i^i-J>3 , 2.^./^ 

lATA AGREEMENT APPROVED & IMMUNIZED 

DOCKET OSTThis approvnl nn,- .jrr^nt of antitrust immunity is subject, where applicable, 

to conditions previoissly imposed. 

This action is ;ii.r:iive alter 7 days unless a petition is filed under 

14 CFK 385.30 oi a review is undertaken on the Department's own motion. 

In view ot the agreement's noncontroversial nature and the availability of 

the above oKJgelure, the 21 -day nericvHtU 4 CFR 303.42 is waived. 

\/A^ ctor, Office of International Aviation 

16 December 2009 

Communications with respect to 

this document should be sent to 

Douglas E. Lavin 

Regional Vice President - North America 

Intemational Air Transport Association 

lATA Washington, 

601 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W. Suite 300 - North Building 

Washington DC 20004
Exhibit 23

LOGO

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The Board of Directors

Cooperative Bankshares, Inc.

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements (Nos. 333-92219,
333-22335, and 333-101442) on Forms S-8 of Cooperative Bankshares, Inc. of our report dated March 8, 2006 with respect to the consolidated statements of financial condition of Cooperative Bankshares, Inc. and subsidiary as of December 31,
2005 and 2004, and the related consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive income, stockholders equity and cash flows for each of the years in the three year period ended December 31, 2005, which report appears in the December
31, 2005 annual report on Form 10-K of Cooperative Bankshares, Inc.

/s/ Dixon Hughes PLLC

Sanford, North Carolina

March 24, 2006
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
No. 1D 17

- 4365

_____________________________
R ICHARD G RIFFIN , Appellant,

v.

S TATE O F F LORIDA , Appellee.

___________________________ On appeal from the Circuit Court for Ala chua County

. Mark W. Moseley, Judge.

January 5, 2018

P ER C URIAM

.
A FFIRMED

.
W ETHERELL , M AKAR , and K ELSEY , JJ., concur

.

_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________ Richard Griffin, pro se, Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
# C_2015170EN.01000501.xml

| 23.5.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 170/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.5.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 170/5

---

Communication from the Minister for Economic Affairs of the Kingdom of the Netherlands pursuant to Article 3(2) of Directive 94/22/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on the conditions for granting and using authorisations for the prospection, exploration and production of hydrocarbons

(2015/C 170/04)

The Minister for Economic Affairs hereby gives notice that an application has been received for authorisation to prospect for hydrocarbons in a segment of block S3 (S3b).

Block segment S3b is delimited by the great circles between vertex pairs A-B, B-C, D-E and A-E and by the line defined in the annex to the Mining Act (Mijnbouwwet) between vertices C and D.

Mijnbouwwet

The vertices are defined as follows:

| Vertex | ° | ′ | ′′ E | ° | ′ | ′′ N |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| A | 3 | 39 | 55,165 | 51 | 59 | 57,092 |
| B | 3 | 58 | 22,192 | 51 | 59 | 57,105 |
| C (1) | 3 | 59 | 55,196 | 51 | 58 | 40,726 |
| D (1) | 3 | 47 | 43,182 | 51 | 49 | 57,079 |
| E | 3 | 39 | 55,183 | 51 | 49 | 57,074 |

Vertex

°

′

′′ E

°

′

′′ N

A

3

39

55,165

51

59

57,092

B

3

58

22,192

51

59

57,105

C (1)

1

3

59

55,196

51

58

40,726

D (1)

1

3

47

43,182

51

49

57,079

E

3

39

55,183

51

49

57,074

The above vertices are defined by their geographical coordinates, calculated according to the ETRS89 system.

Block segment S3b covers an area of 337,4 km2.

2

With reference to the Directive mentioned in the introduction and Article 15 of the Mining Act (Bulletin of Acts and Decrees (Staatsblad) 2002, No 542), the Minister for Economic Affairs hereby invites interested parties to submit a competing application for authorisation to prospect for hydrocarbons in a segment of block S3 (S3b) of the Dutch continental shelf.

Staatsblad

The Minister for Economic Affairs is the competent authority for the granting of authorisations. The criteria, conditions and requirements referred to in Articles 5(1), 5(2) and 6(2) of the above-mentioned Directive are set out in the Mining Act (Bulletin of Acts and Decrees 2002, No 542).

Applications may be submitted during the 13 weeks following the publication of this notice in the Official Journal of the European Union and should be sent to:

Official Journal of the European Union

| The Minister for Economic Affairs |
| --- |
| attn.: Ms J. J. van Beek, Energy Market Directorate |
| Bezuidenhoutseweg 73 |
| Postbus 20401 |
| 2500 EK Den Haag |
| NEDERLAND |

The Minister for Economic Affairs

attn.: Ms J. J. van Beek, Energy Market Directorate

Bezuidenhoutseweg 73

Postbus 20401

2500 EK Den Haag

NEDERLAND

Applications received after the expiry of this period will not be considered.

A decision on the applications will be taken not later than 12 months after this period has expired.

Further information can be obtained by calling Ms J. J. van Beek on the following telephone number: +31 703796326.

---

(1)  approximate location

1

---
#### M. A. JENKINS, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 66-859.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Third District.

Feb. 27, 1968.

Robert L. Koeppel, Public Defender, and Edward J. Winter, Jr., Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.

*305Earl Faircloth, Atty. Gen., and Jesse J. McCrary, Jr., Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

Before CHARLES CARROLL, C. J., and BARKDULL and HENDRY, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from a conviction and sentence on a charge of issuing a worthless check. Appellant seeks reversal on the ground that the trial judge, in a non-jury trial, adjudicated him guilty before his counsel had announced that he had rested his case, thereby depriving him of his right to present a closing argument.

We have reviewed the record and considered the point on appeal in the light of the holdings in Willoughby v. State, Fla.App.1967, 203 So.2d 10; Williams v. State, Fla.App.1967, 201 So.2d 484; Hall v. State, 119 Fla. 38, 160 So. 511. It is our conclusion that no reversible error has been made to appear.

Affirmed.
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL**

**FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT BY**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with this Report of BMB Munai, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended March 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Sanat Kasymov, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 

 

|   | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

|   | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company. |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

| Date: June 16, 2008 | By:    | /s/ Sanat Kasymov                      |
|---------------------|--------|----------------------------------------|
|                |   | Sanat Kasymov, Chief Financial Officer |
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-11093

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

GREGORY P. DAMM,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:16-CR-4-1

Before KING, SMITH, and ELROD, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Gregory P. Damm pleaded guilty to one charge of failing to register as a 

sex offender, and he received an above-guidelines sentence of 60 months in 

prison as well as a five-year term of supervised release. On appeal, Damm 

argues that his sentence is substantively unreasonable because the district 

court failed to appreciate that his homelessness made it difficult for him to 

register and placed too much emphasis on his criminal history.

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

August 9, 2017

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 16-11093 Document: 00514108778 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/09/2017
No. 16-11093

2

If the district court has imposed a sentence that deviates from the 

guidelines range, reasonableness review requires that this court evaluate 

whether the sentence “unreasonably fails to reflect the statutory sentencing 

factors” set forth in 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a). United States v. Smith, 440 F.3d 704, 

708 (5th Cir. 2006). “A non-Guideline sentence unreasonably fails to reflect 

the statutory sentencing factors where it (1) does not account for a factor that 

should have received significant weight, (2) gives significant weight to an 

irrelevant or improper factor, or (3) represents a clear error of judgment in 

balancing the sentencing factors.” Id. 

The district court gave due consideration to the § 3553(a) factors and 

committed no error when balancing them. See id. Damm’s argument that the 

district court should have differently balanced the § 3553(a) factors “is not a 

sufficient ground for reversal.” See United States v. Malone, 828 F.3d 331, 342 

(5th Cir.), cert. denied, 137 S. Ct. 526 (2016).

AFFIRMED.

 Case: 16-11093 Document: 00514108778 Page: 2 Date Filed: 08/09/2017
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM INTERUNION
FINANCIAL CORPORATION CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE YEAR ENDED 
MARCH 31, 1997.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                       2,873,731
<SECURITIES>                                35,169,986
<RECEIVABLES>                                  882,491
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            40,325,192
<PP&E>                                       2,123,423
<DEPRECIATION>                               (692,231)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              48,743,732
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       40,488,466
<BONDS>                                      1,485,801
<COMMON>                                         1,654
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                    150,000
<OTHER-SE>                                   8,119,397
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 6,692,432
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             3,115,407
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                3,674,548
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               258,247
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              76,627
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (894,015)
<INCOME-TAX>                                  (82,864)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (819,461)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 804,174
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (15,287)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.01)
        

</TABLE>