alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit
32.1  SECTION
1350 CERTIFICATION  In
connection with the quarterly report of GlobeStar Therapeutics Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2022 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, James C. Katzaroff, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. SS. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  1.
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of
        Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2.
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
        in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.  Date: August 22, 2022
    By: /s/ James C. KatzaroffJames C. KatzaroffChief Executive Officer  A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting
the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been provided to the Company and
will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
VI 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 588 

For the relief of Robert Liang and Alice Liang. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 18, 2013 

Mrs. FEINSTEIN introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

For the relief of Robert Liang and Alice Liang. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. ADJUSTMENT OF STATUS. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding any other provi5 sion of law or any order, for the purposes of the Immigra6 tion and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1101 et seq.), Robert 

7 Liang and Alice Liang shall be deemed to have been law8 fully admitted to, and remained in, the United States, and 

9 shall be eligible for issuance of an immigrant visa or for 

10 adjustment of status under section 245 of the Immigra11 tion and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1255). 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 588 IS

1 (b) APPLICATION AND PAYMENT OF FEES.—Sub2 section (a) shall apply only if the applications for issuance 

3 of immigrant visas or the applications for adjustment of 

4 status are filed with appropriate fees not later than 2 

5 years after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

6 (c) REDUCTION OF IMMIGRANT VISA NUMBERS.— 

7 Upon the granting of immigrant visas to Robert Liang 

8 and Alice Liang, the Secretary of State shall instruct the 

9 proper officer to reduce by 2, during the current or subse10 quent fiscal year, the total number of immigrant visas that 

11 are made available to natives of the country of birth of 

12 Robert Liang and Alice Liang under section 203(a) of the 

13 Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1153(a)) or, 

14 if applicable, the total number of immigrant visas that are 

15 made available to natives of the country of birth of Robert 

16 Liang and Alice Liang under section 202(e) of that Act 

17 (8 U.S.C. 1152(e)). 

18 (d) PAYGO.—The budgetary effects of this Act, for 

19 the purpose of complying with the Statutory Pay-As-You20 Go Act of 2010, shall be determined by reference to the 

21 latest statement titled ‘‘Budgetary Effects of PAYGO 

22 Legislation’’ for this Act, submitted for printing in the 

23 Congressional Record by the Chairman of the Senate 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 588 IS

1 Budget Committee, provided that such statement has been 

2 submitted prior to the vote on passage. 

Æ 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
<page>			     		  EXHIBIT 32.02


CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Annual Report of Morgan Stanley Spectrum
Global Balanced L.P. (the ?Partnership?) on Form 10-K for the
period ended December 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the ?Report?), I,
Christian Angstadt, Chief Financial Officer of Demeter Management
Corporation, the general partner of the Partnership, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best
of my knowledge:
  (1)	  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
    	  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

  (2)	  The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
       in all material respects, the financial condition and
       results of operations of the Partnership.






By:	  /s/	Christian Angstadt

Name:		Christian Angstadt
Title:	Chief Financial Officer

Date:		March 27, 2008



-
THE SECRETARY OF TRANSPORTATION 

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20590 

August 22~ 2013 

The Honorable Lorenz J. Walker 

Mayor ofBQssier City 

620 Benton Road 

Bossier City, LA 71171 

Dear MayQr Walker: 

:.;_! --2 . - ; ~ j 

Thank you for your letter supporting the application submitted by the Shreveport Airport 

Authority for a grant under the U.S. Department ofTransportation's Small Community Air 

Service Development Program. 

The Smru1 Community Air Service Development Program was established to help smaller 

communities address air service deficiencies, particularly issuestelated to high airfares or 

insufficient service. Under the statute, the Department may make a maximum of 40grant 

awards each year, although no more than four awards may be to communities in the same State. 

In order to provide communities with latitude in developing solutions to their air service 

deficiencies, the statute provides flexibility in the types of projects that can be funded. 

On June 24, the Department issued an order setting a de.adline of July 26 for applications. As 

these grant requests are pending before the Department, I cannot comment on the merits ofany 

particular proposru. I assure you that the Department will give full and fair considerationto all 

proposals that have been properly filed. 

As is our standard practice, I am placing a copy ofyour letter and this response in Docket 

DQT;..QST-2013-0120 as a contact outside the record of this matter. I appreciate your interest in 

this program. 

Anthony R:. Foxx 

/ 

:-...., 
LCH>.<:NZ "L<>" WAU<e;R 

MAYOA 

July 24,2013 

The Honorable AnthoJlY Eoxx 

BOSSIER CtTY~ LOUISIANA 

Secretary, U.S. Department of Transportation 

l2J)0 New Jersey Ave., SE 

Washington DC 20590 

Dear Secretary Foxx: 

~ ft.«N""'"ONn.()#..t) 

Pon.f·oFfiOE oox 0337 

oo•~ crrv. &.A 7-t'!Y"I~ 

(~H))J'""'1~~1 

Thank you for your consideration of the Shreveport Airport Authority's request to expand 

airliM service through 11 OllW route to the Midwest or Atlantic tegion .. 

The creation of this route is essential for the xegion served by Shreveport Regional 

Airport. The growing economy of Northv.'est Louisiana, East Texaq and Southmst 

Arkansas depends upon Shreveport Regional Airport to provide airline corinections to the 

United States and to the world. 

Wefully support the Shreveport Airport Authority's efforts to create additional airline 

service on a new route. The approval of Shreveport's Srnalt Corrununity Air Service 

Development gran\ request wilt help the region in meeting its n~~ fodncreased airline 

.service. 

Thank you again for your considt:ration. 

Sincerely, 

~~ Mayor 

23
Exhibit 32

Certification of CEO and CFO Pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

as Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the
quarterly report on Form 10-Q of TPG Specialty Lending, Inc. (the Company) for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2013, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), Michael
Fishman, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Alan Kirshenbaum, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that,
to such officers knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                     |  |                        
|-------------------- |  | -----------------------
|/s/ Michael Fishman 
|Name:                |  | Michael Fishman        
|Title:               |  | Chief Executive Officer
|Date:                |  | November 8, 2013       
|                    
|/s/ Alan Kirshenbaum
|Name:                |  | Alan Kirshenbaum       
|Title:               |  | Chief Financial Officer
|Date:                |  | November 8, 2013       

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350 and is not being
filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)

In connection with this Report on Form 10-Q for the three months ended December 31, 2013, or the Report, of PennantPark Floating
Rate Capital Ltd., or the Registrant, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Arthur H. Penn, Chief Executive Officer of the Registrant, hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                  
|------------------
|/s/ Arthur H. Penn
|Arthur H. Penn    
|February 6, 2014
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM AUDITED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR YEAR ENDING DECEMBER 31, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH BAOA, INC. 10-KSB.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                          49,525
<DEPRECIATION>                                  40,430
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 105,570
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          289,027
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        44,991
<OTHER-SE>                                   4,310,141
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   105,570
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               973,014
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           (128,078)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 17,266
<INCOME-TAX>                                       800
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             16,466
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    16,466
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .00


</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1 Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350) In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for period ended September 30, 2015 (the Report) of GSV Capital Corp. (the Registrant), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Michael T. Moe, the Chief Executive Officer of the Registrant, hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge, that: (1)

          The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and (2)

          The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant. /s/ Michael T. MoeName: Michael T. MoeDate: November 9, 2015
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Michael Morgan, Appellant.

Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Ira Globerman, J.), rendered July 26, 1989, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of attempted murder in the second degree, and sentencing him as a violent felony offender to an indeterminate prison term of from twelve and one-half to twenty-five years, unanimously affirmed.

The complainant sustained severe injuries, including multiple fractures and the loss of one eye, as a result of a brutal beating by the defendant. Defendant contended that the complainant was under the influence of crack and violently attacked him with a hammer.

At the conclusion of defendant’s testimony, the court granted defense counsel an adjournment until the following Wednesday to call a witness whose proffered testimony was to be that defendant knew that the complainant attempted to use voodoo to control defendant’s behavior. The following Wednesday, the witness failed to appear at trial. Concluding that the proffered testimony was not relevant to issues at trial, the Trial Court required defense counsel to proceed to summation.

The court properly found that the proffered testimony of the prospective defense witness was immaterial to defendant’s justification defense. First, defendant’s own testimony did not place before the jury the issue of whether defendant feared the complainant because of her use of voodoo. Second, as a matter of law, the complainant’s use of voodoo was not relevant to defendant’s justification defense since voodoo is not "physical force” as defined by Penal Law § 35.15. Under these circumstances, the court acted well within its discretion in refusing to grant an adjournment to enable defendant to call the prospective witness to testify *(People v Foy,*32 NY2d 473).

Furthermore, defendant’s sentence as a second violent felony offender was proper. It was unnecessary to hold a hearing on the constitutionality of defendant’s prior conviction, as the *415court properly discerned that defendant’s challenge was not to the constitutionality of his prior plea, but to the impropriety of his sentence (CPL 400.15 [4]). Also, there is no merit to defendant’s contention that his sentence should be vacated in the interest of justice on the ground that the predicate felony statement does not indicate under which subdivision of Penal Law § 265.02 defendant was previously convicted. The indictment under which defendant was convicted indicates that defendant was charged with violent felonies under Penal Law § 265.02 (4). Finally, under the particular circumstances of this case, counsel’s inactivity at sentencing did not constitute ineffective assistance of counsel *(People v Baldi,*54 NY2d 137).

We have reviewed defendant’s remaining contentions and find them to be without merit. Concur—Sullivan, J. P., Carro, Rosenberger, Kupferman and Rubin, JJ.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v.

WILLIAM KEITH KNOX,

Defendant

- Appellant. No. 16

- 50079

D.C. No. 8:13

- cr

- 00220

- CJC

MEMORANDUM *

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Central District of California Cormac J. Carney, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted December 18 , 2017 * *

Before: WALLACE, SILVERMAN , and BYBEE , Circuit Judges.

William Keith Knox appeals from the district court’s judgment and

challenges the 63

- month sentence imposed following his guilty

- plea conviction for

wire fraud, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1343

. We have jurisd iction under 28 U.S.C.

§ 1291, and we affirm.

* This disposition is not appro priate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 

# FILED

DEC 21 2017

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLER K

U.S. COURT OF APPEAL S2 16

- 50079 Knox contends that his guilty plea was not knowing and voluntary. He

asserts that his questions and statements during the change

- of

- plea hearing reflect

that he did not understand the plea. He further contends that the court failed to

remedy his confusion and confirm that he was pleading guilty voluntarily, as

Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 11 requires. We review the voluntariness of a

plea de novo, and an unpreserved Rule 11 claim for plain error. See United States

v. Carter , 795 F.3d 947, 950 (9th Cir. 2015).

Contrary to Knox’s a rgument, the record reflects that the court thoroughly

reviewed all aspects of Knox’s plea with him, gave him multiple opportunities to

speak privately with his attorney, and adequately addressed his questions and

requests for clarification. The totality of the circumstances show that his plea was

knowing and voluntary. See United States v. Kaczynski , 239 F.3d 1108, 1114 (9th

Cir. 2001). Moreover, there was no plain Rule 11 error; the district court twice

confirmed that Knox was pleading guilty voluntari ly and the record does not

reflect that Knox would have pled differently had the court inquired further. See

Fed. R. Crim. P. 11(b)(2); United States v. Escamilla

- Rojas , 640 F.3d 1055, 1061

-

62 (9th Cir. 2011).

AFFIRMED.
EXHIBIT 32





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350





In connection with the quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Emerging Acquisition Corporation (the “Company”) for the quarter ended March 31, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Joseph Rozelle, President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge that:





1.
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








Date: My 13, 2011





/s/ Joseph RozelleJoseph Rozelle

President

(Principal Executive and Financial Officer)











The foregoing certification is being furnished as an exhibit to the Report pursuant to Item 601(b)(32) of Regulation S-K and  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code) and, accordingly, is not being filed as part of the Report for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not incorporated by reference into any filings of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended
September 30, 2016 (the Report) of Solar Senior Capital Ltd. (the Registrant), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, MICHAEL S. GROSS, the Chief Executive Officer of the Registrant,
hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) The information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.



|      |  |                        
|----- |  | -----------------------
|      |  | /S/    MICHAEL S.
GROSS
|Name: |  | Michael S. Gross       
|Date: |  | November 2, 2016
#### Rosemarie Caban, as Administratrix of the Estate of John Caban, Deceased, Appellant, et al., Plaintiffs, v Bonaco Construction Corp. et al., Defendants, and Slattery Associ*378ates, Inc., et al., Respondents. (Action No. 1.) Ralph Davis, Appellant, v Bonaco Construction Corp. et al., Defendants, and Slattery Associates, Inc., et al., Respondents. (Action No. 2.) (And Two Third-Party Actions.)

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Edward Lehner, J.), entered August 24, 1990, which, *inter alia,*granted defendants Berger Lehman Associates, P. C. and Slattery Associates, Inc.’s motions for summary judgment dismissing plaintiffs’ complaints unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Appeal from the order of the same court entered on or about November 6, 1989, is dismissed, without costs, said order having been subsumed in the judgment.

Order, of the same court entered on or about June 14, 1990 *inter alia*granting defendant Jandous Electric Company’s motion for summary judgment against plaintiffs, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

These two personal injury actions arise out of an explosion and fire which occurred on July 29, 1983, just north of the Union Square IRT subway station while several New York City Transit Authority (NYCTA) employees one of whom died from injuries sustained, were engaged in the installation of guard and running rail plates. Plaintiff Davis, one of the injured workers and Rosemarie Caban, the administratrix of the deceased worker, commenced this action against the various contractors engaged by NYCTA to repair and install new tracks and perform certain electrical and signal work.

We have reviewed the record and agree that the IAS court properly granted the motions of defendants Slattery Associates, Inc., Jandous Electric Company and Berger Lehman Associates to dismiss plaintiffs’ complaints as well as all cross claims and counterclaims asserted against them, as no material triable issues of fact existed concerning whether any of their employees caused the fatal explosion and fire. Furthermore, plaintiffs failed to come forward with evidence, except for unexplained workers in non-Transit Authority uniforms, that one or several of the defendants’ employees were doing construction work on or near the site of the explosion. Concur —Carro, J. P., Ellerin, Smith and Rubin, JJ.