alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
MAR-Q4.2013-Ex-10.17




Exhibit 10.17
Summary of Marriott International, Inc. Director Compensation
Non- Employee Directors


	
		
	Board Retainer Fee (annual)
	$75,000

	Share Award (annual)
	$125,000

	Audit Committee Chair Fee (annual)
	$20,000

	Other (non-Audit) Committee Chair Fee (annual)
	$10,000

	Audit Committee Member Retainer (annual)
	$10,000

	Vice Chairman Fee (1) (annual)
	$93,750

	Vice Chairman Share Award (1) (annual)
	$156,250




(1) The Vice Chairman of the Board receives these fees/awards instead of the other Board fees/awards.
Retainer and chair fees are paid on a quarterly basis.  However, in accordance with established Company procedures, a director may elect to defer payment of all or a portion of his or her director fees pursuant to the Company’s Stock and Cash Incentive Plan and/or the Executive Deferred Compensation Plan.  The Company grants the Non-Employee Director Share Awards following the Company’s annual meeting of shareholders.


Other Information
The Company reimburses directors for travel expenses, other out-of-pocket costs they incur when attending meetings and, for one meeting per year, attendance by spouses. To encourage our directors to visit and personally evaluate our properties, the directors also receive complimentary rooms, food and beverages at Company-owned, operated or franchised hotels, as well as the use of hotel-related services such as Marriott-managed golf and spa facilities, when on personal travel. The value of these benefits is reported to the directors as taxable compensation and the directors are not provided any gross-up to cover such taxes. 
Employee Directors
Officers of the Company are not paid for their service as directors.
ROTH TSP ELIGIBLE CONTRIBUTION WORKSHEET: 

BONUS AND ONE-TIME SPECIAL PAYS

If you will be receiving bonuses or one-time special or incentive payments, you may wish to contribute all or 

part of those payments to your TSP account. Like other TSP contributions, elections must be stated in 

percentages rather than dollar amounts. 

Because Roth TSP contributions are calculated based on your gross pay but taken after all other deductions, you 

need to calculate how much money you have available to contribute to Roth TSP. The only deductions made 

from bonuses and one-time special pays are federal income tax withholding (FITW), state income tax 

withholding (SITW) and TSP. However, computing federal and state tax withholding of bonuses or other onetime payments will require a little math.

The federal supplemental rate for withholding is set at 25 percent. State supplemental rates vary state to 

state. Take a look at your state's current supplemental rates at 

http://www.dfas.mil/militarymembers/tspformilitary/rothtsprctaxinfo.html

After obtaining your state supplemental rate, use the worksheet below to calculate the maximum percentage you 

may contribute to TSP. If, for instance, all of your tax deductions equal 40 percent of your one-time payment, 

you cannot make an election of more than 60 percent for your combined traditional and Roth TSP contributions; 

such as a 20 percent traditional TSP election and a 40 percent Roth TSP election. 

Part A Enter Gross Bonus Pay (pre-tax) ($ )

Part B Calculate amount available for contribution:

Amount from Part A ($ ) 

Subtract: 

FITW at supplemental rate ($ ) 

SITW at supplemental rate ($ ) 

Part B Amount available for contribution ($ ) 

Part C Calculate Percent of Pay Available for Contribution

Part B Amount available for contribution ($ ) 

Divide by Part A Gross Bonus Pay ($ ) 

 Multiply by 100 100 

Part C Result: Percent of Pay Available for Combined 

 Traditional and Roth TSP Contribution: % 

There are two more steps:
If you are contributing to both traditional and Roth TSP, then go to the Combined Maximum Percentage to 

make sure your election does not exceed the value allowed. If you submit your election through myPay, there 

are automated edits to ensure you do not exceed the maximum. Also, make sure that your contribution does not 

exceed the annual IRC maximum. See https://www.tsp.gov/planparticipation/eligibility/contributionLimits.shtml
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Denali Commission","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.denali.gov","author_name":"denaliadmin","author_url":"https:\/\/www.denali.gov\/author\/denaliadmin\/","title":"Vulnerability Disclosure Policy","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"CNWxXzQLw5\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.denali.gov\/vulnerability-disclosure-policy\/\">Vulnerability Disclosure Policy<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.denali.gov\/vulnerability-disclosure-policy\/embed\/#?secret=CNWxXzQLw5\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Vulnerability Disclosure Policy” — Denali Commission\" data-secret=\"CNWxXzQLw5\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n"}
EXHIBIT 32





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350





In connection with the quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Southern Growth Corporation (the “Company”) for the quarter ended December 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Joseph Rozelle, President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge that:





1.
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








Date: February 8, 2011





/s/ Joseph RozelleJoseph Rozelle

President

(Principal Executive and Financial Officer)











The foregoing certification is being furnished as an exhibit to the Report pursuant to Item 601(b)(32) of Regulation S-K and  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code) and, accordingly, is not being filed as part of the Report for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not incorporated by reference into any filings of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Denali Commission","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.denali.gov","author_name":"denaliadmin","author_url":"https:\/\/www.denali.gov\/author\/denaliadmin\/","title":"Congressional Budget Justifications","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"2LgoVygpgC\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.denali.gov\/finance\/congressional-budget-justifications\/\">Congressional Budget Justifications<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.denali.gov\/finance\/congressional-budget-justifications\/embed\/#?secret=2LgoVygpgC\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Congressional Budget Justifications” — Denali Commission\" data-secret=\"2LgoVygpgC\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n"}
EXHIBIT 99.2

FORM OF ANNUAL SERVICER'S CERTIFICATE

FLEET BANK (RI), NATIONAL ASSOCIATION

FLEET CREDIT CARD MASTER TRUST II

 

The undersigned, a duly authorized representative of Fleet Bank (RI), National Association ("Fleet"), pursuant to the Amended and Restated Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated and effective as of December 1, 1993, as amended and restated as of January 1, 2002, and further amended by Amendment Number 1 dated as of April 1, 2002 (the "Agreement"), among Fleet, as Servicer, Fleet Credit Card Funding Trust, as Transferor, and Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, as Trustee, does hereby certify that:

Fleet is, as of the date hereof, the Servicer under the Agreement. Capitalized terms used in this Certificate have their respective meanings as set forth in the Agreement.

The undersigned is a Servicing Officer who is duly authorized pursuant to the Agreement to execute and deliver this Certificate to the Trustee.

A review of the activities of the Servicer during the twelve months ended September 30, 2002, and of its performance under the Agreement, was conducted under my supervision.

Based on such review, the Servicer has, to the best of my knowledge, performed in all material respects its obligations under the Agreement throughout the twelve months ended September 30, 2002 and no default in the performance of such obligations has occurred or is continuing except as set forth in paragraph 5 below.

The following is a description of each default in the performance of the Servicer's obligations under the provisions of the Agreement known to me to have been made by the Servicer during the twelve months ended September 30, 2002 which sets forth in detail (i) the nature of each such default, (ii) the action taken by the Servicer, if any, to remedy each such default and (iii) the current status of each such default:

None

 

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has duly executed this Certificate this 15th day of November 2002. 
* 

FLEET BANK (RI), NATIONAL ASSOCIATION,

Servicer,
By: 
/s/ JEFFREY A. LIPSON
Jeffrey A. Lipson
Vice President 
 

Page 44*
#### The People of the State of New York, Appellant, v David Evans, Respondent.

Appeal by the People from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Dufficy, J.), dated April 9, 1990, which granted the defendant’s motion pursuant to CPL 220.20 to dismiss Queens County Indictment No. 104/ 90 on the ground that the defendant was deprived of his right to appear before the Grand Jury.

Ordered that the order is affirmed.

On this appeal, heard together with the People’s related appeals in *People v Oquendo*(172 AD2d 566 [decided herewith]) and *People v Davis*(172 AD2d 554 [decided herewith]), the People challenge the dismissal of an indictment on the ground that the defendant was deprived of his right to appear before the Grand Jury. As was the case in *People v Oquendo (supra),*the defendant requested an opportunity to appear before the Grand Jury and was given a date and time at which to present himself. Again, as in *People v Oquendo (supra),*the defendant’s desire to appear before the Grand Jury was *558thwarted through the failure of the Department of Correction to produce him on time, and was further frustrated by the prosecutor’s having the Grand Jury vote on the matter notwithstanding the inability of the defendant to appear before that body.

For the reasons stated in *People v Oquendo (supra),*we conclude that the court properly dismissed the indictment. Bracken, J. P., Kunzeman, Kooper and Harwood, JJ., concur.
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 509 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 509

  To provide for the conveyance of certain parcels of National Forest 
            System land to the city of Fruit Heights, Utah.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 7, 2013

   Mr. Hatch introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
       referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To provide for the conveyance of certain parcels of National Forest 
            System land to the city of Fruit Heights, Utah.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Fruit Heights Land Conveyance Act''.

SEC. 2. DEFINITIONS.

    In this Act:
            (1) City.--The term ``City'' means the city of Fruit 
        Heights, Utah.
            (2) Map.--The term ``map'' means the map entitled 
        ``Proposed Fruit Heights City Conveyance'' and dated September 
        13, 2012.
            (3) National forest system land.--The term ``National 
        Forest System land'' means the approximately 100 acres of 
        National Forest System land, as depicted on the map.
            (4) Secretary.--The term ``Secretary'' means the Secretary 
        of Agriculture.

SEC. 3. CONVEYANCE OF CERTAIN LAND TO THE CITY OF FRUIT HEIGHTS, UTAH.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary shall convey to the City, without 
consideration, all right, title, and interest of the United States in 
and to the National Forest System land.
    (b) Survey.--
            (1) In general.--If determined by the Secretary to be 
        necessary, the exact acreage and legal description of the 
        National Forest System land shall be determined by a survey 
        approved by the Secretary.
            (2) Costs.--The City shall pay the reasonable survey and 
        other administrative costs associated with a survey conducted 
        under paragraph (1).
    (c) Easement.--As a condition of the conveyance under subsection 
(a), the Secretary shall reserve an easement to the National Forest 
System land for the Bonneville Shoreline Trail.
    (d) Use of National Forest System Land.--As a condition of the 
conveyance under subsection (a), the City shall use the National Forest 
System land only for public purposes.
    (e) Reversionary Interest.--In the quitclaim deed to the City for 
the National Forest System land, the Secretary shall provide that the 
National Forest System land shall revert to the Secretary, at the 
election of the Secretary, if the National Forest System land is used 
for other than a public purpose.
                                 <all>
```
Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCAD-13-0003586 06-NOV-2013 11:39 AM SCAD-13-0003586
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI ' I

OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL, Petitioner,

vs. CHRISTOPHER M. FUJIYAMA, Respondent.

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING (ODC 13-031-9101)
ORDER GRANTING PETITION (By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, Acoba, McKenna, and Pollack, JJ.) Upon consideration of the petition for the immediate restraint of Respondent Christopher M. Fujiyama from the practice of law pursuant to Rule 2.13 of the Rules of the Supreme Court of the State of Hawai' i (RSCH) filed on September 25, 2013 by the Office of Disciplinary Counsel (ODC) pursuant to RSCH Rule 2.13(a), the affidavit and exhibits attached thereto, the September 27, 2013 response filed by Respondent Christopher M. Fujiyama, the exhibit accompanying Respondent Fujiyama’s submission, the October 3, 2013 submission by ODC in reply to Respondent Fujiyama’s submission, and the October 7, 2013 “sur-reply” filed by Respondent Fujiyama, the court notes theproof of the finding of guilt in the United States District Court for the District of Hawai ' i of Respondent Fujiyama for trafficking in counterfeit goods, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2320(a) would be, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 2320(b) and HRS § 701-107(2) (Supp. 2005), a felony were it a conviction in Hawai ' i state courts and further that the conviction is for a crime involving dishonesty or false statements. The court notes Respondent Fujiyama’s cooperative and responsible attitude since his conviction, including his self-reporting of his conviction to ODC, but concludes, pursuant to RSCH Rules 2.13(a)(2), 2.13(a)(3) and 2.13(c), Respondent Fujiyama’s restraint from the practice of law is warranted during the pendency of the disciplinary proceedings against him. Finally, the court notes that, in his submission, Respondent Fujiyama requests that formal proceedings be instituted forthwith. Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Respondent Fujiyama is restrained from the practice of law, pursuant to RSCH Rule 2.13(b), said suspension constituting a suspension for the purposes of RSCH Rule 2.16 during the pendency of the disciplinary proceedings and, therefore, shall be effective 30 days from the entry date of this order, pursuant to RSCH Rule 2.16(c). IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Respondent Fujiyama shall file an affidavit of compliance with his suspension within 10

2days after the effective date of his suspension, pursuant to RSCH Rule 2.16(d). IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that ODC shall file proof of the finding of guilt, and any other related documents it deems relevant, with the Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court as required by RSCH Rule 2.13(a), file in the docket of this case proof of that filing, and refer the Board to the provisions of RSCH Rule 2.13(d) for the prompt institution of a formal disciplinary proceeding pursuant to RSCH Rules 2.7 and 2.13(d). DATED: Honolulu, Hawai' i, November 6, 2013. /s/ Mark E. Recktenwald /s/ Paula A. Nakayama /s/ Simeon R. Acoba, Jr. /s/ Sabrina S. McKenna /s/ Richard W. Pollack

3
i SERVED: JULY 22, 2013 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF HEARINGS

WASHINGTON, DC
IN THE MATTER OF SKYWESTAIRLINES, INC. FAA DOCKETNO. [TO BE ASSIGNED] (Civil Penalty Action) FDMS NO. FAA-2013-0612
NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT OF PROCEEDING This proceeding (heretofore designated as Case No. 2012NM060041) has been assigned to Administrative Law Judge Richard C. Goodwin. All future pleadings and other communications regarding this proceeding shall be served onthe Judge, the FAAHearing Docket, and the otherpersons onthe attached Service List.

...-···"

..

Attachment

- Service ListSERVICE LIST ORIGINAL & ONE COPY 

### Federal Aviation Administration 800 Independence Avenue,S.W. Washington, DC 20591 Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2Wl000 1



### Todd C. Emerson, Respondent's Counsel 

### Director

- Government and Legal Affairs SkyWestAirlines, Inc., Respondent 

### 444 South River Road St. George, UT 84790 TEL: 435-634-3530 FAX: 435-634-3505 ONE COPY



### Michael L. 

### Dworkin, Respondent's Counsel 

### MICHAEL L. 

### DWORKIN AND ASSOCIATES 465 California Street, Suite 210 San Francisco, CA 94104 TEL: 415-421-2500 FAX: 415-421-2560 EMAIL: law@avialex.com Robert Spitzer, Complainant's Counsel 

### Attorney, Office ofRegional Counsel Northwest Mountain Region, ANM-7. Federal Aviation Administration 1601 Lind Avenue, S.W. Renton, WA 98057 TEL: 425-227-1417 FAX: 425-227-1007 FDMS No. FAA-2013-0612 (Civil Penalty Action)

1 Service was byU.S. Mail. For service in person orby expedited courier, use the following address: Federal Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building-Suite2W1000, Washington, DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430. 

### -2-The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin,AdministrativeLawJudge Office ofHearings, M-20 U.S. Department ofTransportation 1200 NewJersey Avenue, S.E. (El1-310) Washington, DC 20590 TEL: 202-366-2139 Attorney-Advisor 202-366-5121 StaffAssistant FPCX:**202-366~7536**



### -3-
PM-EX10.33_12.31.13-Q4




Exhibit 10.33




[LETTERHEAD OF PHILIP MORRIS INTERNATIONAL MANAGEMENT SA]






To: Jacek Olczak 
 
 
 Lausanne, December 12, 2013 
 
Dear Jacek, 
 
The Senior Management Team has decided to implement certain changes to the Global Variable Compensation Program (which includes both the Incentive Compensation Award and the Equity Award) and to the Executive Banding structure.   
 
Details of the changes and their context were set out in the communication from Kevin Click on October 17, 2013. 
 
Following these changes, your role has been designated as Grade 26. Your annual base salary and position in range are unaffected by this change.  The targets for Grade 26 for the Plan Year 2014 are as follows: 
 
		
	•
	Incentive Compensation award target based on an IC business rating of 100% and an “Optimal” individual performance rating is 125 %. 


		
	•
	Equity award target based on a stock business rating of 100% and an “Optimal” individual performance rating is 275%. 


 
Please note that the above targets may be amended at the discretion of the Company at any time without prior notice, and are in any event reviewed annually.  
 
These changes will take effect on January 1, 2014.  The changes will not affect any awards under the Global Variable Compensation Program in respect of 2013 (which are payable in 2014), but will be applicable to any awards in respect of 2014. 


Sincerely yours, 
     
/s/ KRISTIN HOLTER
Kristin Holter 
Director Human Resources Switzerland 
                         





Philip Morris International Management SA, Avenue de Rhodanie 50, 1007 Lausanne, Switzerland  
T:+41 (58) 242 00 00, F: +41 (58) 242 01 01
#### Francis B. GEARY, Appellant, v. The HOME INSURANCE COMPANY, a corporation, Appellee.

No. 809.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Fourth District.

March 14, 1968.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.