alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 9
<RESTATED>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                          14,671
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                           2,000
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    102,606
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                        516,048
<ALLOWANCE>                                     11,991
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 658,622
<DEPOSITS>                                     510,730
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                             17,721
<LONG-TERM>                                     81,613
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        15,175
<OTHER-SE>                                      33,383
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 658,622
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 40,616
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                5,503
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                     0
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                46,119
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                              20,353
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              24,658
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           21,461
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                   12,120
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   1
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                 26,415
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,975
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       1,975
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,051
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.25
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.24
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    8.26
<LOANS-NON>                                      1,045
<LOANS-PAST>                                     1,648
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 7,199
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                    8,716
<RECOVERIES>                                       924
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                               11,991<F1>
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                            11,991
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
<FN>
<F1> INCLUDES $464 DUE TO ADDITIONS FROM ACQUISITIONS.
</FN>


</TABLE>
**Exhibit 31.1**
**CERTIFICATIONS**
I, Elwood G. Norris, certify that: 

1.

I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of American TechnologyCorporation; 
   
2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statementsmade, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 
   
3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;
   
4.

The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 
    
a)

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure thatmaterial information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared; 
    
b)

[paragraph omitted pursuant to SEC Release Nos. 33-2838 and 34-47986]
    
c)

Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectivenessof the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period coveredby this report based on such evaluation; and
    
d)

Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscalquarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report)that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect theregistrant's internal control over financial reporting; and
   
5.

The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on ourmost recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant's independent registered public accounting firm and the auditcommittee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing theequivalent functions): 
     
a)

All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operationof internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and 
    
b)

Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employeeswho have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls over financialreporting. 

Date: December 28, 2004  /s/ ELWOOD G. NORRIS    Elwood G. Norris,     Chairman of theBoard    (Co-Principal Executive Officer)
U.S. International Development Finance Corporation (DFC)

Agency Evaluation of 2021 Federal Employee Viewpoint Survey Results

Each year, the DFC conducts the Federal Employee Viewpoint Survey (FEVS) administered by 

the Office of Personnel Management. The FEVS measures employees' perceptions of whether, 

and to what extent, conditions characteristic of successful organizations are present in 

the agency. The FEVS serves as a tool for employees to share their perceptions in many critical 

areas including their work experiences, their agency, and leadership.

Survey results are analyzed at the Corporation, department, and lower levels to help inform 

decision-making and to allow managers to see where improvements within their work units are 

necessary.

The Partnership for Public Service in conjunction with the Boston Consulting Group also uses 

the results to determine the Best Places to Work in the Federal Government. The DFC placed 

16th on the Best Places to Work in the Federal Government, small agency category.

2021 FEVS Overview

Survey Administration Dates: November 9 – December 10, 2021

Eligibility: full-time/part-time, permanent, non-seasonal, non-political DFC employees on board 

on or before April 2021

Number of Surveys Administered: 343

Number of Surveys Completed: 274

Response Rate: 79.8%

The 2021 FEVS closed on December 10, 2021, was an abbreviated survey, with DFC achieving 

a response rate of 79.8%, and an Employee Engagement Index Score of 77%.

Due to the pandemic, survey administration in 2021 differed from 2020 in some substantial 

ways, making year to year figures less comparable.

DFC’s Employee Engagement Index Score of 77% was ten points higher than 2020 (67%) and 

slightly higher than other small agencies (76%) and higher than governmentwide (71%).
## I N T H E C O U R T O F C R I M I N A L A P P E A L S O F T E X A S NOS. WR-93,789-01 and -02

EX P ARTE LATREL L MARQUER F ORT, App licant

ON AP P LICATIONS FOR WRITS OF HABEAS CORP US CAUSE NOS. W19-45202-I(A) A ND W19-45201- I(A) IN THE CRIMINAL DISTRICT COURT NO. 2 FROM DALLAS COUNTY

Per curiam . O R D E R Applicant was convicted of two offe nses of ag g rava ted assault and sentenc ed to imprisonment. He filed t h es e applications for writs of habeas corpus in the county of conviction, and the district cle rk for

war ded them to this Court. See T E X . C O D E C R I M . P R O C . art. 11.07. Applicant contends that he was denied his rig ht to appeal e ach c onviction beca use counsel failed to timely file notices of appea l. See Garza v. Idaho , 139 S. Ct. 738 (2019). Ap p l i ca n t h as alleg ed fac ts that, if true, might entitle him to re l i ef

. Ex parte Axe l , 757 S.W .2d 369 (Tex. Crim. App. 1988); Jones v. State , 98 S.W .3d 700 (Tex. Crim. App. 2003). Acc ording ly , the rec ord should be develope d. The trial court is the appropr iate forum for finding s of fac t. T E X . C O D E C R I M . P R O C .2

art. 11.07, § 3 (d). The trial court shall order trial counsel to respond to Applicant’s claim. I n 1 developing the rec ord, the trial court may use any means set out in Article 11.07, § 3(d). I f the trial court elec ts to hold a hea ri n g, i t s h all deter mine whether Applicant is indige nt. I f Applicant is indige nt and wants to be repr esente d by counsel, the trial court shall appoint counsel to repr esent him at the hear ing. See T E X . C O D E C R I M . P R O C . art. 26.04. I f counsel is appointed or reta ined, the trial court shall immediately

notify this Court of counsel’s name

. The trial court shall make findings of fac t and c o n cl u sions of l aw as to whether Applicant was denied his rig ht to appea l the convictions beca use t rial counsel failed to ti mely file not ices of appea l. The trial cour

t may make a ny other finding s and conc lusions that it deems a ppropriate

. The trial court shall make findings o f fa ct and conclusions of law withi n ninety day s from the date of this order

. The district cler k shall then immediately forwa rd to this Court the trial court’s finding s and conclusions and the rec ord develope d on rema nd, including, among other things, aff idavits, motions, objec tions, proposed finding s and conclusions, order s, and transcr ipts from hear ings and depositions. See T E X . R. A P P . P. 73.4(b)( 4). Any extensions of time must be reque sted by the trial cour

t and obtained f

rom this Court.

Filed: June 8, 2022 Do not publish

I f a de fenda

nt decides to a

ppeal his convic tion, trial counsel ra ther than a ppellate 1 counsel ha s the duty

to ensure tha t written notice of a ppeal is filed with the tria l court. Jones , 98 S.W .3d at 703.
<TABLE> <S> <C>
                              
<ARTICLE>                          5
<CIK>                              0000924875
<NAME>                             Shearson Mid-West Futures Fund
                                    
<S>                                  <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                      12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                  DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                     JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                       DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                              67,722,636
<SECURITIES>                         1,232,573
<RECEIVABLES>                          220,614
<ALLOWANCES>                                0
<INVENTORY>                                 0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                    69,175,823
<PP&E>                                      0
<DEPRECIATION>                              0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                      69,175,823
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                7,100,518
<BONDS>                                     0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                       0
<PREFERRED>                                 0
<COMMON>                                    0
<OTHER-SE>                          62,075,305
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>        69,175,823
<SALES>                                     0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                    19,312,361
<CGS>                                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                     4,988,566
<LOSS-PROVISION>                            0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                     14,323,795
<INCOME-TAX>                                0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         0
<DISCONTINUED>                              0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                             0
<CHANGES>                                   0
<NET-INCOME>                        14,323,795
<EPS-PRIMARY>                              487.33
<EPS-DILUTED>                               0
        



</TABLE>
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT

KARL A. KUMMER, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D18-1587 ) THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON ) f/k/a THE BANK OF NEW YORK, AS ) SUCCESSOR TRUSTEE TO ) JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., ) AS TRUSTEE FOR THE ) CERTIFICATEHOLDERS OF BEAR ) STEARNS ALT-A TRUST 2005-1 ) MORTGAGE PASS-THROUGH ) CERTIFICATES SERIES 2005-1., ) ) Appellee. ) ) Opinion filed September 11, 2019. Appeal from the Circuit Court for Manatee County; Lon Arend, Judge. Karl A. Kummer, pro se. Kimberly S. Mello and Vitaliy Kats of Greenberg Traurig, P.A., Tampa, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. NORTHCUTT, KELLY, and ATKINSON, JJ., Concur.
IDA 12.31.13 Ex. 10.44






Exhibit 10.44


IDACORP, Inc. and Idaho Power Company Compensation for
Non-Employee Directors of the Board of Directors
(As of January 16, 2014)


All directors of IDACORP also serve as directors of Idaho Power.  The fees and other compensation discussed below are for service on both boards.  Employee directors receive no compensation for service on the boards.  


	
					
	Form of Fee
	 
	Amount

	Base Retainer
	 
	$
	50,000
	


	 
	 
	 

	Additional Retainers:
	 
	 

	Chairman of the board
	 
	100,000
	


	Chairman of audit committee
	 
	12,500
	


	Chairman of compensation committee
	 
	10,000
	


	Chairman of corporate governance and nominating committee
	 
	6,000
	


	 
	 
	 

	Meeting Fees:(1)
	 
	 

	Board meeting
	 
	1,500
	


	Committee meeting
	 
	1,500
	


	Shareholder meeting
	 
	1,500
	


	 
	 
	 

	Annual Stock Awards
	 
	75,000
	


	 
	 
	 

	Subsidiary Board Fees:
	 
	 

	IDACORP Financial Services:
	 
	 

	Monthly retainer
	 
	750
	


	Meeting fees
	 
	600
	


	Ida-West Energy:
	 
	 

	Monthly retainer
	 
	750
	


	Meeting fees
	 
	600
	


	 
	 
	 

	(1) The Chairman of the board does not receive fees for attendance at full board or shareholder meetings.






Deferral Arrangements


Directors may defer all or a portion of their annual IDACORP, Idaho Power, IDACORP Financial Services, Inc., and Ida-West Energy retainers and meeting fees and receive a lump-sum payment of all amounts deferred with interest or a series of up to 10 equal annual payments after they separate from service with IDACORP and Idaho Power.  Any cash fees that were deferred before 2009 for service as a member of the board of directors are credited with the preceding month’s average Moody’s Long-Term Corporate Bond Yield for utilities, or the Moody’s Rate, plus 3%, until January 1, 2019 when the interest rate will change to the Moody’s Rate.  All cash fees that are deferred for service as a member of the board of directors beginning January 1, 2009 are credited with interest at the Moody’s Rate.  Interest is calculated on a pro rata basis each month using a 360-day year and the average Moody’s Rate for the preceding month.


Directors may also defer their annual stock awards, which are then held as deferred stock units with dividend equivalents reinvested in additional deferred stock units.  Upon separation from service with IDACORP and Idaho Power, directors will receive either a lump-sum distribution or a series of up to 10 equal annual installments.  Upon a change in control the directors’ deferral accounts will be distributed to each participating director in a lump sum.  The distributions will be in shares of IDACORP common stock, with each deferred stock unit equal to one share of IDACORP common stock and any fractional shares paid in cash.
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3977 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 3977

           To reform the grave marker allowance for veterans.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 8, 1994

   Mr. Peterson of Florida introduced the following bill; which was 
             referred to the Committee on Veterans' Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
           To reform the grave marker allowance for veterans.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. GRAVE MARKER ALLOWANCE.

    (a) Reimbursement for Non-Government Markers.--Section 2306 of 
title 38, United States Code, is amended to by adding at the end 
thereof the following new subsection:
    ``(e) In lieu of furnishing a headstone or marker under subsection 
(a)(2) or (b) of this section, the Secretary, in the Secretary's 
discretion, having due regard for the circumstances in each case, may 
reimburse the person entitled to request such headstone or marker for 
the actual costs incurred by or on behalf of such person in (1) 
acquiring a non-Government headstone or marker for placement in any 
cemetery other than a national cemetery in connection with the burial 
or memorialization of the deceased individual, and (2) lettering final 
dates on such headstones or markers acquired while the individual is 
alive. Reimbursement under the preceding sentence may be made only upon 
the request of the person entitled to request the headstone or marker 
and may not be made in an amount in excess of the average actual cost 
(not including freight charges), as determined by the Secretary, of 
headstones and markers furnished under subsections (a) and (b) of this 
section.''.
    (b) Grave Liners.--Section 2306(d)(1) of such title is amended by 
striking out ``shall provide a grave liner for each'' and inserting in 
lieu thereof ``may provide a grave liner for any''.
    (c) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply to deaths occurring on or after November 1, 1994.

                                 <all>
```
Docket No: FAA-2015-8466 Dir ID: 2015-NM-045-AD

Contacts. With whom outside the FAA has this proposal been discussed?

Organization Person Contacted Date Response

National Business Aircraft Association Eli Cotti 3/10/15

Regional Airline Association 3/10/15

Aircraft Owners & Pilots Association Robert Hackman 3/10/15

Airlines for America Robert Ireland 3/10/15
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE

SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Cooperative Bankshares, Inc. (the Company) as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 24, 2006 (the Report), the undersigned, hereby
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that: (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934; and (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the period covered by the Report.



By:

/s/ Frederick Willetts, IIIFrederick Willetts, IIIPresident and Chief Executive OfficerBy:

/s/ Todd L. SammonsTodd L. SammonsSenior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer


Date: March 24, 2006
**EXHIBIT 23.2**

 

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

 

To the Board of Directors

BMB Munai, Inc.

 

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on Form S-3 (No. 333-146831) of BMB Munai, Inc. of our report dated June 11, 2008 (including our report dated June 11, 2008 regarding the effectiveness of BMB Munai, Inc.’s internal control over financial reporting as of March 31, 2008) relating to the financial statements and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, which appears in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended March 31, 2008. 

 

**HANSEN, BARNETT** **& MAXWELL, P.C.**

 

Salt Lake City, Utah

June 11, 2008
#### Rosemarie McCarthy, Respondent, v John S. McCarthy, Appellant.

Order insofar as appealed from unanimously reversed on the law without costs and cross motion denied. Memorandum: In general, counsel fees pendente lite should be denied where the applicant possesses sufficient assets to pay counsel *(see, Louise v Louise,*156 AD2d 937; *Mullin v Mullin,*144 AD2d 1020, *lv denied*74 NY2d 604; *Anonymous v Anonymous,*120 AD2d 983, *appeal dismissed*68 NY2d 808; *Drabek v Drabek,*92 AD2d 722; *Freid v Freid,*23 AD2d 549). In awarding counsel fees, the court should consider the distribution of the marital property *(see, Parsons v Parsons,*101 AD2d 1017, 1018). Here, if plaintiff succeeds in setting aside or limiting the effect of the antenuptial agreement, she may receive a substantial award of marital property. Because plaintiff has a bank account of over $70,000 with which to pay her own attorney’s fees and because, if she succeeds at trial, she may be entitled to a substantial distributive award, it is premature to award counsel fees at this time. (Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Onondaga County, Mordue, J.—Counsel Fees.) Present—Dillon, P. J., Boomer, Green, Balio and Davis, JJ.
#### Don R. ORTEGA, Jr. v. STATE.

No. 39298.

Supreme Court of Florida.

March 1970.

Certiorari denied without opinion. 230 So.2d 177.
EXHIBIT 21

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

We consent to the  incorporation by reference in the registration  statements of
AccuStaff  Incorporated on Form S-8,  Registration Numbers 33-88262,  333-06899,
33-15701, 333-16043,  333-30445 and 333-41305 and the registration statements of
AccuStaff Incorporated on Form S-3, Registration Numbers 333-17715 and 333-18695
of our report dated March 20, 1998, on our audits of the consolidated  financial
statements of AccuStaff  Incorporated  and  Subsidiaries as of December 31, 1997
and 1996 and for each of the three years in the period ended  December 31, 1997,
which report is included in the Annual Report on Form 10-K

COOPERS & LYBRAND L.L.P.
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION OF CO-PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND PRINCIPAL

FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



Each of the undersigned hereby certifies, in accordance with 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, in his capacity as an officer of American Technology Corporation (the Company), that, to his knowledge, the Annual Report of the Company on Form 10-K/A for the fiscal ended September 30, 2005 fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in such report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company as of the dates
and for the periods presented in the financial statements included in such report.



Dated: January 30, 2006



|                                       
|---------------------------------------
|                                       
|/s/    ELWOOD G. NORRIS                
|Elwood G. Norris, Chairman of the Board
|(Co-Principal Executive Officer)       



|                                                                
|----------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                
|/s/    JOHN R. ZAVOLI                                           
|John R. Zavoli, President, Chief Operating Officer              
|and Interim Chief Financial Officer                             
|(Co-Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer)