alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Manuel Diaz, Appellant.

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (John A.K. Bradley, J.), rendered April 10, 1989, convicting defendant after a jury trial of murder in the second degree, and sentencing him to an indeterminate term of imprisonment of fifteen years to life, unanimously affirmed.

The testimony of an eyewitness who identified defendant as the killer who wore a white hat was not incredible as a matter of law. Some of his testimony was internally inconsistent and some was inconsistent with the witness who did not make an in-court identification, but our own examination of the record shows that the eyewitness had ample opportunity to observe defendant, with whom the eyewitness had a long, if passing acquaintance. The eyewitness had close up views of defendant before the shots rang out. Moreover, the eyewitness’s account of the shooting was corroborated by the second witness’s testimony that the person wearing the white hat was the killer. Accordingly, there is no basis to disturb the jury’s determination of the facts. *(People v Malizia,*62 NY2d 755; *People v Bleakley,*69 NY2d 490, 495.)

We find no merit to defendant’s claim that his lineup and in-court identifications should have been suppressed. The initial photographic identification procedure was not suggestive because the eyewitness knew the police were looking for "Poppocon”. The eyewitness said that he knew the nickname before his contact with the police, and mention of the name did not serve to single out defendant’s picture from among the *418other photographs that the eyewitness examined. The eyewitness’s adamant denial that the police told him whom to identify at the lineup and the testimony of the detective who ran the proceeding show that lineup was fair. Defendant’s claim that the lineup is the fruit of his unlawful arrest is unpreserved. Defendant did not move to suppress the lineup on that ground, and defendant referred to the apartment at which he was arrested as his home for the first time at trial.

Since the legality of defendant’s arrest was not a jury question, the court did not commit error in refusing to charge that the police were required to obtain an arrest warrant. Defendant has failed to preserve his claims that he was denied a fair trial by certain comments of the prosecutor on summation *(People v Balls,*69 NY2d 641) or by the court’s supplemental charge on credibility. Were we to consider defendant’s arguments in the interest of justice we would find that the prosecutor did not commit reversible error *(People v*Crim*mins,*36 NY2d 230) and that the court’s response to the jury’s question was proper. *(People v Almodovar,*62 NY2d 126.) Concur—Sullivan, J. P., Carro, Rosenberger, Kupferman and Rubin, JJ.
**EXHIBIT 23.2**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (FormS-8, No. 333-44044) pertaining to the Pemstar Inc. 1994 Stock Option Plan, Pemstar Inc. 1995 Stock Option Plan, Pemstar Inc. 1997 Stock Option Plan, Pemstar Inc. 1999 Amended and Restated Stock Option Plan, Pemstar Inc. 2000 Stock Option Planand 2000 Employee Stock Purchase Plan, the Registration Statement (Form S-3, No. 333-75284) pertaining to Common Stock, Preferred Stock, Debt Securities, Depository Shares, Securities Warrants and Units, the Registration Statement (Form S-8,No. 333-97517) pertaining to the Pemstar Inc. 2000 Employee Stock Purchase Plan and Pemstar Inc. 2002 Stock Option Plan, the Registration Statement (Form S-3, No. 333-97511) pertaining to Common Stock and the Registration Statement (FormS-8, No. 333-112974) pertaining to the Pemstar Inc. 2002 Employee Stock Purchase Plan of our report dated May 7, 2004, except for paragraph 4 in Note 1, as to which the date is June 20, 2006 with respect to the March 31, 2004consolidated financial statements and schedule of Pemstar Inc. included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended March 31, 2006. 

/s/ Ernst & Young LLP 

Minneapolis, Minnesota 

June 22, 2006
EXHIBIT 10.1


MERCURY GENERAL CORPORATION BOARD FEES


 


 


 


	 	PRIOR FEES	NEW FEES
	Director Compensation - Board Fee	$4,000 per quarter	$4,000 per quarter
	Director Compensation - Meeting Attendance	
        $4,000 per meeting held in person
        or telephonically

         

        lasting 1 hour or more

         
	
        $4,000 per meeting held in person
        or telephonically

         

        lasting 1 hour or more

         

	 	
        $500 per meeting held telephonically
        lasting less

         

        than 1 hour

         
	
        $500 per meeting held telephonically
        lasting less

         

        than 1 hour

         

	 	 	 
	Audit Committee	 	 
	Meeting Attendance (Chair)	$3,500 per meeting	$5,000 per meeting
	Meeting Attendance (Non Chair)	$2,500 per meeting	$3,000 per meeting
	Annual Retainer (Chair)	$4,000	$5,000
	 	 	 
	Compensation Committee	 	 
	Meeting Attendance (Chair)	$500 per meeting	$2,000 per meeting
	Meeting Attendance (Non Chair)	$500 per meeting	$1,500 per meeting
	Annual Retainer (Chair)	$2,500	$4,000
	 	 	 
	Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee	 	 
	Meeting Attendance (Chair)	$1,500 per meeting	$1,500 per meeting
	Meeting Attendance (Non Chair)	$1,000 per meeting	$1,000 per meeting
	Annual Retainer (Chair)	$1,500	$2,000
	 	 	 
	Investment Committee	 	 
	Meeting Attendance (Chair)	$1,500 per meeting	$2,000 per meeting
	 	 	 
	Lead Director - Annual Retainer	$10,000	$15,000
40CFR302.6 Notification requirements Johnson, Alyssa LT to: Lynn Beasley 12/16/2010 01:53 PM Sent by: Alyssa.M.Johnson@uscg.mil Show Details History: This message has been replied to and forwarded. Good Afternoon Ms. Beasley, Your name was listed as the point of contact for the most recent regulation update to 40 CFR 302. Please let me know if you are no longer responsible for updating this regulation. Recently, it was brought to my attention that the contact information for the NRC li sted in 40CFR302.6 is incorrect. The correct NRC contact information is 1 - 800 - 424 - 8802, local phone number 202 - 267 - 2675, and fax number 202 - 267 - 1322. We do not maintain a telefax, and the following phone numbers have been disconnected 202 - 425 - 2675 and 20 2 -267 -2675 (listed fax number). Please let me know appropriate how long it will take to update the regulations. Thx, Alyssa LT Alyssa Johnson National Response Center COMDT CG- 5335 Operations Officer Phone: 202 - 372 -2432/1 - 800 - 424 - 8802 Fax: 202 - 267 - 1322
COURT OF APPEALS

S E C O N D D I S T R I C T O F T E X A S

CHIEF JUSTICE

 BONNIE SUDDERTH

JUSTICES

 LEE GABRIEL

 ELIZABETH KERR

 MARK T. PITTMAN

 J. WADE BIRDWELL

 DABNEY BASSEL

 DANA WOMACK

TIM CURRY CRIMINAL JUSTICE CENTER

401 W. BELKNAP, SUITE 9000

FORT WORTH, TEXAS 76196-0211

TEL: (817) 884-1900

FAX: (817) 884-1932

www.txcourts.gov/2ndcoa

CLERK 

 DEBRA SPISAK

CHIEF STAFF ATTORNEY

 LISA M. WEST

GENERAL COUNSEL

 CLARISSA HODGES

April 18, 2019

Hon. Kimberly C. McCary

Judge, County Court at Law No. 1

210 S. Woodrow Ln.

Denton, TX 76205

* DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL *

Catherine Luft

Assistant Criminal District Attorney

1450 East McKinney, Ste. 3100

Denton, TX 76209

* DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL *

E. V.

Prudence Sanchez

Prudence Sanchez Attorney At Law,

PLLC

721 W. Mulberry St.

Denton, TX 76209

* DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL *

C. A.

Juvenile Court Clerk, Denton County

Charlie J. Cole Bldg.

210 South Woodrow Lane

Denton, TX 76205-6304

* DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL *

Hon. David L. Evans

Regional Presiding Judge

Tom Vandergriff Civil Courts Building

100 N. Calhoun, 4th Floor

Fort Worth, TX 76196

* DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL *

RE: Court of Appeals Number: 02-19-00060-CV

02-19-00061-CV

Trial Court Case Number: JV-2017-00561

JV-2018-00016

Style: In the Matter of C.A., Jr.

Today the Second Court of Appeals issued an opinion and judgment in the

above-referenced cause. Copies of the opinion and judgment are attached and can

also be viewed on our Court’s webpage at: http://www.txcourts.gov/2ndcoa.

FILE COPY
02-19-00060-CV

April 18, 2019

Page 2

Respectfully yours,

DEBRA SPISAK, CLERK

FILE COPY
EXHIBIT 23.1

We have issued our report dated March 19, 1999, accompanying the consolidated
financial statements included in the Annual Report of CHS Electronics, Inc. on
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1998. We hereby consent to the
incorporation by reference of said report in the Registration Statements of CHS
Electronics, Inc. on Form S-3 (File No. 333-29779, effective July 25, 1997) and
on Forms S-8 (File No. 333-40537, filed on November 19, 1997, as amended by File
No. 333-61941 filed on August 20, 1998; File No. 333-40545, filed on November
19, 1997, as amended by File No. 333-61943 filed on August 20, 1998; File No.
333-40547, filed on November 19, 1997, as amended by File No. 333-61931 filed on
August 20, 1998; File No. 333-61933 filed on August 20, 1998).

GRANT THORNTON LLP

Miami, Florida
March 19, 1999
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Calvin Sanders, Appellant.

Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Phylis Bamberger, J.), rendered March 30, 1989, convicting defendant after a jury trial of Robbery in the Second Degree, for which he was sentenced as a second felony offender to 3 Vi to 7 years, unanimously affirmed.

The evidence established that defendant acted as a decoy to distract the victim as his accomplice carried out the robbery at gunpoint. The victim was sitting in a parked car, waiting for a passenger when defendant approached, asked for a *398cigarette, then walked around and waited in front of the car. Immediately, the accomplice forced his way into the front seat of the car, held a gun to the victim’s head, and demanded money. As the victim tried to get out of the driver’s door, defendant pushed that door closed. The accomplice then stole $800 from the victim and fled. An unidentified bystander helped the victim restrain defendant. Viewing the evidence in a light most favorable to the People, and giving due deference to the jury’s findings of credibility *(People v Bleakley,*69 NY2d 490, 495; *People v Contes,*60 NY2d 620, 621) defendant’s guilt was proved beyond a reasonable doubt by overwhelming evidence. Testimony by witnesses established that defendant acted in concert with the unapprehended co-perpetrator *(see, People v Charles,*168 AD2d 339).

The prosecutor’s statement during his summation that the victim’s passenger was the same woman who had been seen in the company of the co-perpetrator was not supported by evidence. However, the Court properly instructed the jury to rely only on the evidence, and that counsel’s arguments were not evidence. Defendant advances no argument which successfully rebuts the presumption that the jury followed this instruction *(People v Comer,*73 NY2d 955, 956-957).

Since this was a case of mixed direct and circumstantial evidence, the Court was not required to provide a circumstantial evidence charge *(see, People v Barnes,*50 NY2d 375, 380; *People v Devonish,*159 AD2d 320, 321, *lv denied*76 NY2d 733; *see also, People v Johnson,*159 AD2d 442, *lv denied*76 NY2d 790).

The court’s *Sandoval*ruling was a sound exercise of discretion and we decline to disturb it. *(People v Jones,*158 AD2d 346, *lv denied*76 NY2d 737.) Concur—Murphy, P. J., Wallach, Asch, Kassal and Smith, JJ.
Exhibit 4.3





Consent of Independent Registered
Public Accounting Firm


We consent to the
reference made to our firm under the caption “Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm” in Part B of the Prospectus
and to the use of our report dated February 19, 2014, in this Registration Statement (File No. 333-193177) of Smart Trust,
Capital Innovations Global Infrastructure & MLP Trust, Series 5.


 


 


/s/ Grant
Thornton LLP


Grant
Thornton LLP


Chicago, Illinois


February 19, 2014
Exhibit 10.5


 


AMENDMENT


TO THE


SUPPLEMENTAL NON-QUALIFIED SAVINGS PLAN FOR
HIGHLY

 COMPENSATED EMPLOYEES OF HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL INC.




AND ITS SUBSIDIARIES


 


Effective January 1, 2014, the Supplemental
Non-Qualified Savings Plan for Highly Compensated Employees of Honeywell International Inc. and its Subsidiaries is hereby amended
by replacing the first sentence of Section 2 in its entirety with the following sentence: 


 


“Any employee of the Corporation and its participating
affiliates who is (i) (A) an Executive level employee, and (B) the Chief Executive Officer of the Corporation or a direct report
of the Chief Executive Officer and designated by the Corporation as an ‘officer’ of the Corporation (an ‘Officer’),
during the designated election period (the ‘Open Enrollment Period’) that occurs prior to the beginning of the
applicable Plan Year (as defined below), or (ii) (A) who is an Executive level employee but not an Officer of the Corporation at
any time during the Open Enrollment Period that occurs prior to the beginning of the applicable Plan Year, and (B) whose Base Annual
Salary (as defined in Subparagraph 4(a)(i) below) that is paid and posted to the Plan’s electronic recordkeeping system as
of the last paydate in September of the Plan Year immediately preceding the applicable Plan Year exceeds the dollar limit for a
highly compensated employee for the Plan Year under Section 414(q) of the Code, shall be eligible (an ‘Eligible Employee’)
to participate in the Plan (subject to the limitations set forth in the following sentence) and elect deferrals of Base Annual
Salary for such Plan Year effective as of the first paydate of such Plan Year that follows the Open Enrollment Period.”
IN THE MISSOURI COURT OF APPEALS

JUNE 3, 2014

 WESTERN DISTRICT

THE FOLLOWING CASES WERE AFFIRMED PURSUANT TO RULE 84.16(b)

AND ISSUED PER CURIAM

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

WD75898 Carla Steck and Charles Steck vs. Steve Watkins

WD76553 Ruby Richmond vs. Division of Employment Security

WD76554 Consolidated with WD76553

WD76555 Consolidated with WD76553

WD76556 Consolidated with WD76553

WD76604 Christen Storla vs. Shawn Schultz and Karen Grove

WD76763 Dawn Stewart vs. Division of Employment Security

THE FOLLOWING CASES WERE AFFIRMED PURSUANT TO RULE 30.25(b)

AND ISSUED PER CURIAM

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

None
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         September 5, 2018.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Elizabeth Reed, 202-268-3179.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on August 29, 2018, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail, & First-Class Package Service Contract 45 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2018-216, CP2018-298.                

Elizabeth Reed,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2018-19164 Filed 9-4-18; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
QuickLinks
 -- Click here to rapidly navigate through this document











































 
 

  Exhibit 10(n)    
    


Summary of Non-Employee Director Compensation  



	•
	Beginning January 1, 2014, cash compensation for non-employee Directors (may be deferred and invested in TCF Common
Stock) consists of the following:  



	•
	Annual Retainer of $60,000; and   



	•
	An additional $20,000 annual retainer for Committee Chairs. 






	•
	Inside Directors (Messrs. Cooper, Dahl, Jasper, and Winslow) are not compensated for service as Directors.  



	•
	Directors Stock Grant Program:  



	•
	Annually, non-employee Directors receive grants of TCF Common Stock equal to $45,000. For Directors elected after a stock
grant has been awarded, a pro-rata stock grant is awarded;   



	•
	The number of shares granted is determined by dividing $45,000 by the average of the high and low prices of TCF Common
Stock on the grant date;   



	•
	The stock grant vests annually, when the next grant is made;   



	•
	Dividends are paid on unvested shares at the rate generally paid to holders of TCF Common Stock; and  



	•
	Unvested shares will vest if a change in control occurs. 






	•
	Non-employee Directors may defer fees and stock grants under the TCF Directors Deferred Compensation Plan (the "Directors
Deferred Compensation Plan") until the end of their Board service. 



	•
	Stock Ownership Guidelines:  



	•
	Non-employee Directors are required to own shares of TCF Common Stock worth an amount equal to five times their annual base
retainer (excluding any supplementary retainer for Committee chairs);   



	•
	All shares of TCF Common Stock owned directly or indirectly by a Director will be considered in determining whether the
Stock Ownership Guidelines have been met. Stock options will not be counted toward the Stock Ownership Guidelines;   



	•
	Directors have until the later of (i) January 16, 2017 or (ii) the fifth anniversary of their
appointment to the Board to reach the applicable target ownership level; and   



	•
	Despite not being applicable until January 16, 2017, all Directors satisfied the Stock Ownership Guidelines as of
February 22, 2014, except for Mr. Ramstad who did not yet qualify due to the increased requirement caused by the change to a higher annual retainer and elimination of meeting fees.  






	•
	TCF offers the TCF Matching Gift Program to supplement donations made by non-employee Directors to charitable organizations
of their choice up to a maximum of $20,000 annually. 



	•
	Indemnification rights are provided to Directors under TCF's Certificate of Incorporation and Bylaws, to the extent
authorized under Delaware General Corporation Law and TCF maintains Directors and Officers Insurance. 



	•
	TCF reimburses Directors for travel and other expenses to attend Board meetings or attend to other Board business as a
business expense, and TCF occasionally holds Board retreats at a remote location and pays Directors' travel and lodging expenses incurred in connection with the meeting, as well as those of the
Directors' spouses or significant others. 












QuickLinks



Exhibit 10(n)
**
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION OF CO-CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

**PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)**

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2020 (the“Report”) of Solar Senior Capital Ltd. (the “Registrant”), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, MICHAEL S. GROSS, the Co-Chief Executive Officer ofthe Registrant, hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge, that: 

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements ofSection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and 

(2) The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant. 

 
 
/S/ MICHAEL S. GROSS
**Name:** **Michael S. Gross****Date:** **November 5, 2020****
Exhibit 10.77

 

	
 
    	
Effective   January 1, 2014
    


 

Susanne McAvoy

[address]

 

Dear Ms. McAvoy:

 

This will confirm our agreement to amend your employment agreement with Crown Media Holdings, Inc. (“Crown”) dated January 1, 2012 (the “Agreement”), as follows:

 

1.                                      Your new title will be “Executive Vice President, Marketing, Creative and Communications.”

 

2.                                      The term of the Agreement and your employment by Crown as set forth in Paragraph 2 of the Agreement is extended until December 31, 2015, unless otherwise terminated in accordance with the terms of the Agreement.

 

3.                                      Your base salary as set forth in Paragraph 3 of the Agreement will increase to Three Hundred Thirty Five Thousand Dollars ($335,000.00) effective March 1, 2014.

 

Except as amended herein, all other terms of the Agreement will remain in full force and effect.

 

 

	
 
    	
Very truly   yours,
    
	
 
    	
Crown Media   Holdings, Inc.
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
By: 
    	
/s/ William   Abbott
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
Name:   William Abbott
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
Title:   President and Chief Executive Officer
    


 

	
Agreed and   Accepted:
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
/s/ Susanne   McAvoy
    	
 
    
	
Susanne   McAvoy
EXHIBIT 32.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of SSI Investments II Limited (the "Company") for the period ended October 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned, Thomas J. McDonald, Chief Financial Officer of the Company hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that, to his knowledge:





(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





SSI INVESTMENTS II LIMITEDDate: December 15, 2010
By:
/s/ Thomas J. McDonaldThomas J. McDonaldChief Financial Officer