alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IIA

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 3840

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

MAY 25 (legislative day, MAY 16), 1994

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Governmental Affairs

JUNE 21 (legislative day, JUNE 7), 1994

Committee discharged; ordered referred to the Committee on Environment

and Public Works

AN ACT

To designate the Federal building and United States courthouse located at 100 East Houston Street in Marshall,

Texas, as the ‘‘Sam B. Hall, Jr. Federal Building and

United States Courthouse’’.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

4 The Federal building located at 100 East Houston

5 Street in Marshall, Texas, shall be known and designated

6 as the ‘‘Sam B. Hall, Jr. Federal Building and United

7 States Courthouse’’.
2

HR 3840 RCS

1 SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

2 Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document,

3 paper, or other record of the United States to the Federal

4 building and United States courthouse referred to in sec5 tion 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Sam B.

6 Hall, Jr. Federal Building and United States Court7 house’’.

Passed the House of Representatives May 23, 1994.

Attest: DONNALD K. ANDERSON,

Clerk.
Exhibit  31



Rule 13a-14(a)/15(d)-14(a) Certifications

I, Mark A. Samuels, certify that:

1.    I have reviewed this annualreport on Form 10-KSB of SpectRx, Inc.;

2.    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.    The small business issuer's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:

(a)   Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b)  Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c)   Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting; and

5.    The small business issuer's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a)  All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b)  Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting.

|Date:  April 27, 2007 | /s/ Mark A. Samuels
Mark A. Samuels
Chief Executive Officer and
Chief Financial Officer
|--------------------- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
exhibit10bbdirectorfeearrangements




Exhibit 10(bb) 


NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTOR FEE ARRANGEMENTS 


Non-employee directors are paid an annual retainer fee of $200,000.  If the Chairman of the Board is not an employee of the Corporation, he or she is paid an additional annual fee of $50,000. If the Chairman of the Board is an employee of the Corporation, a Presiding or Lead Director is appointed who is paid an additional annual fee of $25,000.  Committee Chairs are paid an additional annual fee of $20,000. 


No meeting fees or committee membership fees are paid.
<page>			     		  EXHIBIT 32.02


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Annual Report of Morgan Stanley Spectrum
Global Balanced L.P. (the ?Partnership?) on Form 10-K for the
period ended December 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the ?Report?), I, Kevin
Perry, Chief Financial Officer, Demeter Management Corporation,
the general partner of the Partnership, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:
  (1)	  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
   	  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

  (2)	  The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
     in all material respects, the financial condition and
     results of operations of the Partnership.






By:	  /s/	Kevin Perry

Name:		Kevin Perry
Title:	Chief Financial Officer

Date:		March 31, 2006



-
1 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF E NERGY

PUBLIC MEETING ON EN ERGY CONSERVATION PR OGRAM FOR CONSUMER

PRODUCTS: ENERGY CON SERVATION STANDARDS FOR BATTERY

CHARGERS AND EXTERNA L POWER SUPPLIES

U.S. Department of Energy

1000 Independence Avenue, SW

Washington DC, 20585

Wednesday, May 2, 2012

9 a.m.

– 5 p .m., Room 8E

- 089

Purpose

During this meeting the Department of Energy (DOE) will present the notice of proposed

rulemaking (NOPR) on energy conservation standards for battery chargers and external

power supplies (EPSs) a nd will seek input from interested parties on the methodologies,

assumptions, data sources, and proposed standard levels presented in the NOPR.

Agenda

9:00

– 9:05 am Welcome , Introductions, Ground Rules

Doug Brookman

9:05

– 9:1 5 am Opening Remarks, Background, Regulatory History

Victor Petrolati

9: 15

– 9 : 45 am Opening Comments from Participants

Doug Brookman

9 : 45

– 10: 30 am Market Assessment Including Product Definitions and

Scope

Brian Booher

10: 30

– 1 0 : 45 am Break

1 0 : 45

– 11: 45 am Technology Assessment, Screening and Engineering

Analyse s

Peter Protopa

p pas and Chris Skahan

11: 45 am

– 12: 15 pm Energy Use and Markups Analyses

Daniel Lauf

12: 15

– 1: 15 pm Lunch

1: 15

– 2: 15 pm Life Cycle Cost, Shipments, National Impact, Regulatory

Impact, and Manufacturer Impact Analyses

Pamela Costello, Daniel Lauf, and Hayden Cook2

2: 15

– 2: 3 0 pm Utility Impact, Employment Impact, and Environmental

Impact Analyses

Sanaee Iyama

2 : 30

– 2 : 45 pm Break

2 : 45

– 4 : 15 pm Summary of Results and Proposed Standards

Ari Reeves

4: 15

– 4: 30 pm Labeling

Ari Reeves

4:30

– 4:5 5 pm Closing Comments from Participants

Doug Brookman

4:5 5

– 5:00 pm Closing Remarks

Vic tor Petrolati
----

----

I Informacje

Komisja

----

Kursy walutowe euro (1)

7 marca 2005

(2005/C 58/01)

1 euro= 

----

(1)

Źródło: referencyjny kurs wymiany walut opublikowany przez ECB.

----

----

Uprzednie zgłoszenie koncentracji

(Sprawa nr COMP/M.3648 — Gruner + Jahr/Motorpresse)

(2005/C 58/02)

(Tekst mający znaczenie dla EOG)

----

(1)Dz.U. L 24 z 29.1.2004, str. 1.

----

Europejski inspektor ochrony danych (EDPS)

----

Opinia europejskiego inspektora ochrony danych (EDPS) na temat wniosku dotyczącego decyzji Rady w sprawie wymiany informacji pochodzących z rejestrów karnych (COM (2004) 664 końcowy z 13 października 2004 r.)

(2005/C 58/03)

EUROPEJSKI INSPEKTOR OCHRONY DANYCH,

uwzględniając Traktat ustanawiający Wspólnotę Europejską, w szczególności jego art. 286,

uwzględniając Kartę Praw Podstawowych Unii Europejskiej, a w szczególności jej art. 8,

uwzględniając dyrektywę 95/46/WE Parlamentu Europejskiego i Rady z dnia 24 października 1995 r. w sprawie ochrony osób fizycznych w zakresie przetwarzania danych osobowych i swobodnego przepływu tych danych,

uwzględniając rozporządzenie (WE) nr 45/2001 Parlamentu Europejskiego i Rady z dnia 18 grudnia 2000 r. w sprawie ochrony osób fizycznych w zakresie przetwarzania danych osobowych przez instytucje i organy wspólnotowe i o swobodnym przepływie tych danych, a w szczególności jej art. 41,

PRZYJMUJE NINIEJSZĄ OPINIĘ:

A.   Wprowadzenie

B.   Główne elementy wniosku widziane z perspektywy ochrony danych.

C.   Analiza wpływu

D.   Konkluzje

Sporządzono w Brukseli, dnia 13 stycznia 2005 r.

Peter HUSTINX

Europejski inspektor ochrony danych

----
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Elpidio Batista, Appellant.

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Jay Gold, J.), rendered April 20, 1988, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree and sentencing him, as a predicate felon, to a term of imprisonment of from 4 Vi to 9 years, unanimously affirmed.

There is no merit to defendant’s claim that the jury verdict was against the weight of the evidence because of alleged inconsistencies in the undercover police officer’s testimony. The alleged inconsistencies involved matters essentially collateral to the elements of the crime of which defendant was convicted, and they related to credibility alone. The determination of the jury, which heard argument on the alleged inconsistencies but credited the officer’s testimony, should not be disturbed on appeal. *(People v Malizia,*62 NY2d 755, *cert denied*469 US 932.)

The trial court’s summary denial of defendant’s motion to *387set aside the verdict on the ground of newly discovered evidence, pursuant to CPL 330.30 (3) was proper, given defendant’s failure to establish the prerequisites for such a claim, i.e., that the evidence could not have been discovered before trial by the exercise of due diligence and that the evidence did not merely contradict former evidence introduced by the People *(People v Salemi,*309 NY 208, 216, *cert denied*350 US 950; *People v Latella,*112 AD2d 321, *lv denied*66 NY2d 616).

The defendant was properly adjudicated a predicate felon, without a hearing where, in challenging the constitutionality of the plea on the predicate, defense counsel admitted that defendant had been properly allocuted but argued, based on his observation of the defendant during the current proceeding, that he was not "bright enough” to knowingly waive his rights. Since counsel admitted that defendant had been properly allocuted, the plea suffered from no constitutional infirmity and counsel’s observation two years after the plea did not warrant a hearing. *(People v Harris,*61 NY2d 9.) Concur— Sullivan, J. P., Rosenberger, Wallach, Asch and Kassal, JJ.
- BL_Liberia amended 12-15-2006, signed 09-06-and 12-1960, amended09-26 and 29 1964
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Brian Humphrey, Appellant.

(Appeal No. 2.)

Appeal unanimously dismissed. Same Memorandum as in *People v Humphrey*([appeal No. 1] 172 AD2d 1071 [decided herewith]). (Appeal from Judgment of Supreme Court, Erie County, Rossetti, J.— Criminal Possession Stolen Property, 5th Degree.) Present— Callahan, J. P., Denman, Green, Pine and Lowery, JJ.
----

|   | (1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:  | May 23, 2011 |   | /s/ Cedric W. Burgher   |   |
|--------|--------------|--------|-------------------------|--------|
|   |         |   | Cedric W. Burgher       |   |
|   |         |   | Chief Financial Officer |   |

----
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Justice

###### Antitrust Division

                    Notice is hereby given that, on August 14, 2018, pursuant to Section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301*et seq.*                     (“the Act”), DVD Copy Control Association (“DVD CCA”) has filed written notifications simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing changes in its membership. The notifications were filed for the purpose of extending the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances. Specifically, Skypine Electronics (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd., Shenzhen City, PEOPLE'S REPUBLIC OF CHINA, has been added as a party to this venture.                

Also, Videon Central Inc., State College, PA; Foryou General Electronics, Huizhou, PEOPLE'S REPUBLIC OF CHINA; Taiwan Sanshin Electronics Co., Tokyo, JAPAN; Teltron Baires S.A., Buenos Aires, ARGENTINA; D&M Holdings, Kawasaki, JAPAN; Seiko Epson Corporation, Suwa, JAPAN; and FMS Co., Ltd., Gwangjeok-myeon, REPUBLIC OF KOREA, have withdrawn as parties to this venture.

No other changes have been made in either the membership or planned activity of the group research project. Membership in this group research project remains open, and DVD CCA intends to file additional written notifications disclosing all changes in membership.

                    On April 11, 2001, DVD CCA filed its original notification pursuant to Section 6(a) of the Act. The Department of Justice published a notice in the                     **Federal Register**                     pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act on August 3, 2001 (66 FR 40727).                

                    The last notification was filed with the Department on May 16, 2018. A notice was published in the                     **Federal Register**                     pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act on June 7, 2018 (83 FR 26498).                

Suzanne Morris,

Chief, Premerger and Division Statistics Unit, Antitrust Division.

[FR Doc. 2018-19070 Filed 8-31-18; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE 4410-11-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
The schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Dean
Witter Spectrum Balanced Fund L.P. and is qualified in its entirety by
references to such financial instruments.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                      19,127,125
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  277,052<F1>
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              19,620,770<F2>
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                19,620,770<F3>
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               893,626<F4>
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,251,592
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (357,966)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (357,966)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (357,966)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>Receivables include subscription receivable of $191,569 and interest
receivable of $85,483.
<F2>In addition to cash and receivables, total assets include net unrealized
gain on open contracts of $216,593.
<F3>Liabilities include redemptions payable of $801,425, accrued brokerage
commission of $92,147, and accrued management fees of $20,942.
<F4>Total revenue includes realized trading revenue of $177,564, net
change in unrealized of ($175,835) and interest income of $891,897.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 560 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 560

To provide that the individual mandate under the Patient Protection and 
          Affordable Care Act shall not be construed as a tax.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 14, 2013

    Mr. Lee introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To provide that the individual mandate under the Patient Protection and 
          Affordable Care Act shall not be construed as a tax.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. FINDINGS.

    Congress finds that on June 28, 2012, the Supreme Court ruled that 
the individual mandate imposed by section 1501 of the Patient 
Protection and Affordable Care Act (Public Law 111-148) and amended by 
section 10106 of such Act and sections 1002 and 1004 of the Health Care 
and Education Reconciliation Act of 2010 (Public Law 111-152), has 
certain functional characteristics of a tax and could be sustained as 
an exercise of Congress's power to tax under article I, section 8, 
clause 1 of the Constitution.

SEC. 2. CLASSIFICATION OF INDIVIDUAL MANDATE AS NON-TAX.

    (a) In General.--Section 1501 of the Patient Protection and 
Affordable Care Act (Public Law 111-148) is amended by adding at the 
end the following new subsection:
    ``(e) Rule of Construction.--Nothing in the amendments made by this 
section shall be construed as imposing any tax or as an exercise of any 
power of Congress enumerated in article I, section 8, clause 1 of, or 
the 16th amendment to, the Constitution.''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by this section shall apply 
as if included in the enactment of section 1501 of the Patient 
Protection and Affordable Care Act.
                                 <all>
```
J-S12008-15

*

 Former Justice specially assigned to the Superior Court.

NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P. 65.37

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF

PENNSYLVANIA

Appellee

v.

EDWARD ZEIGLER

Appellant No. 2248 EDA 2013

Appeal from the Judgment of Sentence May 2, 2013

In the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County

Criminal Division at No(s): CP-51-CR-0001450-2012

BEFORE: BOWES, SHOGAN AND FITZGERALD,* JJ.

JUDGMENT ORDER BY BOWES, J.: FILED JUNE 15, 2015

Edward Zeigler appeals from the judgment of sentence seven to 

fourteen years incarceration to be followed by ten years probation imposed 

by the trial court after he pled guilty to aggravated assault and persons not 

to possess a firearm. Counsel has filed a petition to withdraw from 

representation and a supplemental brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 

386 U.S. 738 (1967), and Commonwealth v. Santiago, 978 A.2d 349 (Pa. 

2009), after we declined to permit him to withdraw and directed him to 

address an issue pertaining to Appellant’s prior juvenile record. We now 

affirm and grant counsel’s petition to withdraw.

We outlined the facts of this matter and legal requirements for an 

Anders withdrawal in our prior opinion. See Commonwealth v. Zeigler, 
J-S12008-15

- 2 -

112 A.3d 656 (Pa.Super. 2015). Accordingly, we need not repeat them. We 

add only that counsel has notified Appellant via letter of his filing of the 

supplemental brief and provided that brief to Appellant. Further, the 

Commonwealth has filed a supplemental brief agreeing with counsel’s 

assessment. 

We previously addressed Appellant’s claims in his original Anders brief 

and determined that they were frivolous. However, we remanded this 

matter to address whether Appellant’s prior commission of a robbery as a 

juvenile resulted in an adult conviction or a juvenile adjudication. Counsel 

has supplied the court with the presentence report that was considered by 

the court, and Appellant’s FBI criminal extract, both of which confirm that 

Appellant was convicted as an adult and that he served two to six years 

incarceration. Thus, he submits that Appellant’s sentence for persons not to 

possess a firearm was legal. Our review of the presentence report 

considered by the trial court demonstrates that Appellant was not 

adjudicated delinquent, but convicted of a crime. Accordingly, he was 

lawfully sentenced. See Zeigler, supra (discussing legality of sentence 

issue relative to persons not to possess a firearm).

In sum, after our independent review and for reasons discussed in our 

prior published opinion as well as this memorandum, we agree with counsel 

that Appellant’s appeal is wholly frivolous. Therefore, we affirm and grant 

counsel’s petition to withdraw.
J-S12008-15

- 3 -

Judgment of sentence affirmed. Todd Mosser, Esq.’s petition to 

withdraw granted. Jurisdiction relinquished. 

Judgment Entered.

Joseph D. Seletyn, Esq.

Prothonotary

Date: 6/15/2015