alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 4083

To amend the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act by designating the Lower Salmon

River in Idaho as a component of the National Wild and Scenic Rivers

System, and for other purposes.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 17, 1994

Mr. LAROCCO introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Natural Resources

A BILL

To amend the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act by designating

the Lower Salmon River in Idaho as a component of

the National Wild and Scenic Rivers System, and for

other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Lower Salmon River

5 Recreational and Scenic Rivers Act of 1994’’.
2

•HR 4083 IH

1 SEC. 2. RECREATIONAL AND SCENIC RIVER DESIGNATIONS.

2 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 3(a) of the Wild and Sce3 nic Rivers Act (16 U.S.C. 1274(a)) is amended by adding

4 at the end the following new paragraph:

5 ‘‘( ) LOWER SALMON RIVER, IDAHO.—(A)(i) The 23.7

6 mile segment from Long Tom Bar in the southeast quar7 ter of section 31, township 25 north, range 5 east to the

8 line between range 1 east and range 2 east, to be adminis9 tered by the Secretaries of Agriculture and the Interior

10 as a recreational river.

11 ‘‘(ii) The 35.3 mile segment from the line between

12 range 1 east and range 2 east to the mouth of Hammer

13 Creek in the southwest quarter of section 15, township

14 28 north, range 1 east, to be administered by the Sec15 retary of the Interior as a recreational river.

16 ‘‘(iii) The 53 mile segment from Hammer Creek to

17 the confluence of the Snake River, to be administered by

18 the Secretary of the Interior as a scenic river.

19 ‘‘(B) Notwithstanding subsection (b), the boundaries

20 of the public lands of the segments described in subpara21 graph (A) shall be the boundaries of the public lands with22 drawn by the Secretary of the Interior through Public

23 Land Order 6629, effective November 13, 1986, and Pub24 lic Land Order 6670, effective April 1, 1988, and for those

25 lands not included in Public Land Orders 6629 and 6670,

26 the boundaries shall be the legal subdivision line nearest
3

•HR 4083 IH

1 one-quarter mile from the mean high water line of the

2 river.’’.

3 (b) LIMITATION.—Nothing in this Act, or in the

4 amendment to the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act made by

5 this Act, shall be construed as authorizing any acquisition

6 of any scenic easement that without the consent of the

7 landowner would affect any regular use of relevant lands

8 that was exercised prior to the acquisition of such ease9 ment. Nothing in this Act, or in the amendments to the

10 Wild and Scenic Rivers Act made by this Act, shall affect

11 any existing use of the Lower Salmon River, provided that

12 such use occurs at levels consistent with the resource man13 agement plan.

14 SEC. 3. PERMANENT WITHDRAWAL.

15 The withdrawals made by the Secretary of the Inte16 rior through Public Land Order 6629, effective November

17 13, 1986, and Public Land Order 6670, effective April

18 1, 1988, are made permanent.

Æ
<PAGE>

                                                                   Exhibit 10.17

                          AMENDMENT TO PROMISSORY NOTES
                          DEFERRAL OF INTEREST PAYMENTS

         THIS AMENDMENT TO PROMISSORY NOTES (the "Amendment") is made effective
as of the 31 day of December 2001, by and among Venturos AS, a Norwegian
corporation (the "Lender") and MediaBin, Inc., a Georgia corporation (the
"Borrower").

                              W I T N E S S E T H:
                              - - - - - - - - - -

         WHEREAS, Lender is the holder of certain Promissory Notes from
Borrower, as listed below ("Notes"):

     o  Note dated March 23, 2000, in the principal amount of $1,000,000;
     o  Note dated October 11, 2000, in the principal amount of $750,000;
     o  Note dated December 28, 2000, in the principal amount of $2,500,000;
     o  Note dated April 4, 2001, in the principal amount of $500,000;
     o  Note dated June 21, 2001, in the principal amount of $2,000,000;
     o  Note dated September 28, 2001, in the principal amount of $1,250,000
     o  Note dated November 12, 2001, in the principal amount of $1,125,000; and

         WHEREAS, Lender and Borrower wish to amend the Notes as hereinafter
provided;

         NOW, THEREFORE, for and in consideration of the mutual agreements
herein contained and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and
sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, Lender and Borrower hereby agree
as follows:

         "The interest payment due upon each of the above Notes on December 31,
         2001, including interest previously deferred, totals approximately
         $278,000, will be deferred until March 31, 2002. The interest deferred
         will be added to the principal balance of each Note and will accrue
         interest at the same rate as the rest of the principal."

         All references in the Notes to this "Note" shall hereafter refer to the
Notes as hereby amended.

         Except as expressly provided herein, all terms and conditions of the
Notes remain in full force and effect. Nothing herein shall be construed to
constitute a novation of the Notes, and the intention of the parties hereto is
not to extinguish the Notes.

         This Amendment shall be construed in accordance with the laws of the
State of Georgia.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Borrower and Lender have caused this Amendment to
be executed, as of the date first above written.

BORROWER:                                  LENDER:


MEDIABIN, INC.                             VENTUROS AS

By:      /s/ Haines Hargrett               By:      /s/ Rune Dybesland
   ----------------------------------         ----------------------------------
   Name:                                      Name:
         ----------------------------               ----------------------------
   Title:                                     Title:
          ---------------------------                ---------------------------
   Date:                                      Date:
         ----------------------------               ----------------------------
Exhibit 32.1


CERTIFICATION





In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Universal Business Payment Solutions Acquisition Corporation (the “Company”) for the period ended June 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Bipin C. Shah, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify as of the date hereof, solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code, that to the best of my knowledge:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date: August 15, 2011
/s/ Bipin C. ShahBipin C. ShahChief Executive Officer










Exhibit 32.1


CERTIFICATION





In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Universal Business Payment Solutions Acquisition Corporation (the “Company”) for the period ended June 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Peter Davidson, Chief Administrative Officer of the Company, hereby certify as of the date hereof, solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code, that to the best of my knowledge:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date: August 15, 2011
/s/ Peter DavidsonPeter DavdisonChief Administrative Officer
(April 15, 1991)

#### Gerald Bilotto et al., Respondents, v Michael Webber, Appellant.

In an action to recover damages for breach of contract, the defendant appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Bowers, J.H.O.), entered August 1, 1989, which, after a nonjury trial, is in favor of the plaintiffs and against him in the principal sum of $31,600.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

In June 1986 the defendant, a general contractor, entered into a contract with the plaintiffs to construct a single-family house on their property. The contract provided that there would be substantial completion of the construction by December 21, 1986, and that time was of the essence. The house was not completed by that date, and by letter dated March 17, 1987, the plaintiffs terminated the contract.

The trial court properly found that the plaintiffs were entitled to terminate the contract because of the defendant’s breach *(see, Zev v Merman,*73 NY2d 781; *cf., Young v Whitney,*111 AD2d 1013). By the completion date, there was only a partial foundation, partial roof, and no inside work done, such as the electrical wiring or the installation of plumbing fixtures. The defendant’s contention that the delay was caused by the weather conditions and the existence of a "rock ledge” on the property is unavailing. There is no support in the record for the claimed adverse weather conditions, and the defendant admitted that he was aware of the "rock ledge” before the contract was executed.

In addition, there is no basis to disturb the trial court’s determination, based on the testimony of the plaintiffs’ expert *(see, Epstein v State of New York,*124 AD2d 544, 548), that the defendant was also in breach of the contract because of his defective workmanship. The plaintiffs’ expert testified that the window openings were improperly sized; the structure was improperly reinforced, the support columns in the basement were improperly cut and placed, the I beams were improperly placed, steel support beams were improperly secured, and structural supports were improperly installed, causing the Building Department to issue a Stop Work Order. He also testified that headers were not installed, and "two-by-fours” were improperly used. In fact, the defendant admitted that the "two-by-fours” were inadequate.

Finally, the trial court’s award of damages in this case was proper *(see, Bellizzi v Huntley Estates,*3 NY2d 112; Annotation, *Cost of Correction or Completion or Difference in Value,*
      *640
      *as Measure of Damages for Breach of Construction Contract,*76 ALR2d 805, 810). Sullivan, J. P., Lawrence, Eiber and Ritter, JJ., concur.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

                     CONSENT OF COOPERS & LYBRAND, L.L.P.

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements of
AccuStaff Incorporated on Form S-8, Registration Numbers 33-88262, 333-06899,
333-15701 and 333-16043 and the registration statements of AccuStaff
Incorporated on Form S-3, Registration Numbers 333-17715 and 333-18695 of our
report dated March 26, 1997, on our audits of the consolidated financial
statements of AccuStaff Incorporated and Subsidiaries as of December 31, 1996
and 1995 and for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 1996,
which report is included in the Annual Report on Form 10-K.

                                       COOPERS & LYBRAND, L.L.P.

Jacksonville, Florida
March 28, 1997
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Dynamic Health Products, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the quarterly period ended September
30, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Cani I. Shuman, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ Cani I. Shuman     
|Cani I. Shuman         
|Chief Financial Officer
|November 15, 2004
be addressed by this court."). Accordingly, we 

ORDER the judgment of conviction AFFIRMED.' 

J. 

cc: Hon. Stefany Miley, District Judge 

Kocka & Bolton 

Attorney General/Carson City 

Clark County District Attorney 

Eighth District Court Clerk 

'Although we filed the fast track statement and appendix submitted 

by Hairston, they fail to comply with the Nevada Rules of Appellate 

Procedure. Hairston's fast track statement refers to matters in the record 

without specific citation to the appendix, see NRAP 3C(e)(1)(C); NRAP 

28(e)(1), and the appendix is not paginated sequentially, does not include 

a properly alphabetized index, and does not contain all of the required 

documents, see NRAP 3C(e)(2)(C); NRAP 30(b)(2); NRAP 30(c). 

Additionally, despite this court's issuance of a notice of deficient certificate 

of compliance, counsel failed to file a certificate of compliance as required 

by NRAP 3C(h)(3). Counsel for Hairston, Jennifer S. Bolton, is cautioned 

that the failure to comply with the briefing and appendix requirements 

and directives of this court in the future may result in the imposition of 

sanctions. See NRAP 3C(n); Smith v. Emery,109 Nev. 737, 743, 856 P.2d 

1386, 1390 (1993). 

2
# FILED April 28, 1997 Cecil Crowson, Jr. Appellate C ourt Clerk IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TENNESSEE

AT KNOXVILLE

STATE OF TENNESSEE, ) NOT FOR PUBLICAT ION ) Appellee, ) CUMBERLAND COUNTY ) v. ) ) NO. 03S01-9604-CC-00047 MICHAEL DEAN BUSH, ) ) Appellant. )

ORDER ON PETITION TO REHEAR A petition for rehearing has been filed on behalf of appellant. After consideration of the same, the Court is of the opinion that the petition should be and the same is hereby

denied at the cost

of appellant. Enter this 28th day of April, 1997.
PER CURIAM
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      EXHIBIT 21

                                  SUBSIDIARIES
                                       OF
                        INTERUNION FINANCIAL CORPORATION



Name of Subsidiary                           Jurisdiction of Incorporation
------------------                           -----------------------------


Bearhill Limited                             British Virgin Islands

Credifinance Capital Inc.                    Ontario, Canada

Credifinance Securities Ltd.                 Ontario, Canada

Guardian Timing Services Inc.                Ontario, Canada

I & B Inc.                                   State of Delaware

InterUnion Asset management Limited          Ontario, Canada

Marbury Trading Corporation                  Panama

The Glen-Ardith Frazer Corporation           Ontario, Canada



NOTE: All subsidiaries do business under their official names.






                              Page E - 1 of E - 2
----

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

(Fifth Chamber)

of 15 December 2004

in Case C-272/03 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesfinanzhof): Hauptzollamt Neubrandenburg v Jens Christian Siig (1)

(Community Customs Code - Incurrence of a customs debt - Temporary admission procedure - Change of the tractor of a semi-trailer)

(2005/C 45/15)

Language of the case: German

In Case C-272/03: reference for a preliminary ruling under Article 234 EC from the Bundesfinanzhof (Germany), made by decision of 13 May 2003, received at the Court on 24 June 2003, in the proceedings between Hauptzollamt Neubrandenburg and Jens Christian Siig, trading as ‘Internationale Transport’ Export-Import – the Court: (Fifth Chamber) composed of R. Silva de Lapuerta, President of the Chamber, C. Gulmann and R. Schintgen, Judges; A. Tizzano, Advocate General; R. Grass, Registrar, has given a judgment on 15 December 2004, in which it rules:

Articles 718(3)(d) and 670(p) of Commission Regulation (EEC) No 2454/93 of 2 July 1993 laying down provisions for the implementation of Council Regulation (EEC) No 2913/92 establishing the Community Customs Code must be interpreted as meaning that those provisions prohibit the use of a road tractor registered outside the customs territory of the Community to transport a semi-trailer from a place within the customs territory of the Community, where the semi-trailer is loaded with goods, to another place within the customs territory of the Community, where the semi-trailer is merely parked with a view to being transported subsequently by another road tractor to the consignee of the goods, who is established outside the customs territory of the Community.

----

(1)OJ C 213 of 06.09.2003

----
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-4171

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff – Appellee,

v.

WILLIAM CHRISTOPHER BUTLER,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of North Carolina, at Greenville. James C. Fox, Senior

District Judge. (4:13-cr-00051-F-1)

Submitted: November 25, 2014 Decided: December 19, 2014

Before SHEDD, WYNN, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Richard Croutharmel, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellant. 

Thomas G. Walker, United States Attorney, Jennifer P. 

May-Parker, Shailika K. Shah, Assistant United States Attorneys, 

Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

William Butler was sentenced to twenty years’ 

imprisonment and a lifetime of supervised release for

transporting child pornography in violation of 18 U.S.C. 

§ 2252(a)(1) (2012). On appeal, Butler contends that the 

district court plainly erred in finding a sufficient factual 

basis to accept his guilty plea. We affirm.

Because Butler did not challenge the Fed. R. Crim. P. 

11 proceedings in the district court, we review his challenge 

for plain error. United States v. Mastrapa, 509 F.3d 652, 657 

(4th Cir. 2007). Under plain error review, Butler must 

demonstrate that an error (1) occurred, (2) was plain, and 

(3) affected his substantial rights. United States v. 

Henderson, 133 S. Ct. 1121, 1126 (2013). Even then, we will

correct the error only if it “seriously affects the fairness, 

integrity or public reputation of judicial proceedings.” Id.

(internal quotation marks and alteration omitted).

Before entering judgment on a guilty plea, a district 

court must find a factual basis to support the plea. Fed. R. 

Crim. P. 11(b)(3). The factual basis may be supported by 

anything in the record, including the presentence report. 

United States v. Martinez, 277 F.3d 517, 525 (4th Cir. 2002). A

mere blanket admission of guilt, in response to a recitation of 

the elements of the charged offense, is, without more, not a 
3

sufficient factual basis to support a plea. See United 

States v. Carr, 271 F.3d 172, 178-81 (4th Cir. 2001).

We have reviewed the record and find no plain error. 

Assuming, without deciding, that Butler's admission at the Rule 

11 hearing was insufficient by itself to support a guilty plea, 

the record as a whole, including the presentence report, 

provided ample factual basis for the plea.

We affirm the district court’s judgment. We dispense 

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are 

adequately presented in the materials before this court and 

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
|    |                                                                                             |
|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| 1. | I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of FelCor Lodging Trust Incorporated; and |

|    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            |
|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| 2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report. |

|                       |
|-----------------------|
|                       |  |  |
| Date:  April 28, 2017 |   | /s/ Michael C. Hughes |
|                  |   | Michael C. HughesChief Financial Officer |
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     (The Company's Annual Report on Form 10K for the Period
      Ending December 31, 1996)
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                                          0000924921
<NAME>                                         STU STREGER
       
<S>                                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                           1,607,311
<SECURITIES>                                    11,693,143
<RECEIVABLES>                                    2,195,700
<ALLOWANCES>                                        18,000
<INVENTORY>                                      1,039,390
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                17,007,959
<PP&E>                                           3,273,648
<DEPRECIATION>                                     565,167
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  37,526,040
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            1,659,768
<BONDS>                                            171,651
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                             9,939
<OTHER-SE>                                      35,684,682
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    37,526,040
<SALES>                                          6,848,382
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 7,007,641
<CGS>                                            3,706,267
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    3,706,267
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                         0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 207,650
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (4,053,238)
<INCOME-TAX>                                    (1,503,131)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (2,550,107)
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (2,550,107)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        (0.27)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        (0.27)
        


</TABLE>