alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1 CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE AND FINANCIAL OFFICER OF LAKESIDE VENTURES, INC. PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO § 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report of Lakeside Ventures, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended February 28, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, David M. Rees, Chief Executive and Financial Officer of the Company, do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, based on my knowledge, that:  1)The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2)The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company  .Date: April 13, 2011/S/ David M. ReesDavid M. Rees
Chief Executive and Financial Officer This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of §18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

JUDGMENT

No. 04

- 22

- 00681

- CV

In the Interest of E.G.K. , a Child

From the 166th Judicial District Court

, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2021

- PA

- 01021

Honorable Kimberly Burley , Judge Presiding

BEFORE JUSTICE ALVAREZ

, JUSTICE RIOS , AND JUSTICE RODRIGUEZ

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the trial court’s termination judgment

is AFFIRMED. No costs of appeal are taxed against Appellant.

SIGNED April 5, 2023.

_____________________________ Liza A. Rodriguez, Justice
DISMISS and Opinion Filed August 23, 2024 

# S

In The 

### Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-24-00153-CV IN THE INTEREST OF A.K.M., A CHILD On Appeal from the 303rd Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DF-16-15496 MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Smith, Miskel, and Breedlove Opinion by Justice Smith Appellant’s brief in this case is over due. By order date d June 17, 2024, we granted appellant’s request for an extensi on of time to file his brief and ordered appellant’s brief to be filed by July 13, 2024. We cautioned appella nt that failure to do so would result in the dismissal of this appeal without further notice. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 38.8(a)(1). To date , appellant has not file d a brief nor otherwise corresponded with the Court regarding th e status of this appeal.–2– Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 38.8 (a)(1); 42.3(b), (c).

240153F.P05 /Crai g Smith / CRAIG SMITH JUSTICE–3– 

# S

Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas JUDGMENT
IN THE INTEREST OF A.K.M., A CHILD
No. 05-24-00153-CV On Appeal from the 303rd Judicial District Court, Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DF-16-15496. Opinion delivered by Justice Smith. Justices Miskel and Breedlove participating. In accordance with this Court’s opi nion of this date, the appeal is DISMISSED

. Judgment entered August 23, 2024
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Finance and Accounting Service Providing payment services for the U.S. Department of Defense

Search
Search

Search

              - 
              - 
              - 
              - 
              - 

-  Military Member		 
-  Retired Military & Annuitant		 
-  Civilian Employee		 
-  Contractor & Vendor		 

HomemypayinfoSummary View Documents

                        - 2020 IRS W4
                        - Leave and Earnings Statements
                        - Summary View Documents
                        - Opt In for Electronic Delivery
                        - Use the Right URL
                        - Two-Factor Authentication                            - Initial Set Up
                          - Add Authenticator App
                          - Some Things To Know About Online Security
                        - myPay Browser Requirements
                        - myPay Help
                        - Password Rules                            - Password Reset Questions
                          - Password FAQs
                        - myPay Tips
                        - Protect Yourself Online                            - Mobile Apps
                          More

**About myPay's Summary View Documents****summary view **
**x**

**Page updated March 23, 2021**

### Stay Connected

Department of Defense     Department of Veterans Affairs     Military Employment Verification     Warrior Care Website     Defense Contract Mgmt Agency  DoD Forms     Department of State     Civilian Personnel Mgmt Service     DTS Travel Center     System for Award Mgmt (SAM)    Congressional/LegislationPersonnel Force Innovation     Freedom of Information Act     DFAS Hotline   Contact Us     Accessibility / Section 508    EEO / No Fear Act  

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 172 (Wednesday, September 5, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Pages 45164-45165]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-19258]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meetings

TIME AND DATE: 2:00 p.m. on Thursday, September 6, 2018.

PLACE: Closed Commission Hearing Room 10800.

STATUS: This meeting will be closed to the public.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: Commissioners, Counsel to the Commissioners, 
the Secretary to the Commission, and recording secretaries will attend 
the closed meeting. Certain staff members who have an interest in the 
matters also may be present.
    The General Counsel of the Commission, or his designee, has 
certified that, in his opinion, one or more of the exemptions set forth 
in 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(3), (5), (6), (7), (8), 9(B) and (10) and 17 CFR 
200.402(a)(3), (a)(5), (a)(6), (a)(7), (a)(8), (a)(9)(ii) and (a)(10), 
permit consideration of the scheduled matters at the closed meeting.
    Commissioner Jackson, as duty officer, voted to consider the items 
listed for the closed meeting in closed session.
    The subject matters of the closed meeting will be:
    Institution and settlement of injunctive actions;
    Institution and settlement of administrative proceedings;
    Resolution of litigation claims; and
    Other matters relating to enforcement proceedings.
    At times, changes in Commission priorities require alterations in 
the scheduling of meeting items.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: For further information and to 
ascertain what, if any, matters have been added, deleted or postponed; 
please contact Brent J. Fields from the Office of the Secretary at 
(202) 551-5400.


[[Page 45165]]


    Dated: August 30, 2018.
Brent J. Fields,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2018-19258 Filed 8-31-18; 11:15 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P
I

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 3859

To amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to provide for the complete

use of visas available under the diversity transition program.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

FEBRUARY 10, 1994

Mr. SCHUMER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on the Judiciary

A BILL

To amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to provide

for the complete use of visas available under the diversity

transition program.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. COMPLETING USE OF VISAS AVAILABLE UNDER

4 DIVERSITY TRANSITION PROGRAM.

5 Section 132 of the Immigration Act of 1990 (Public

6 Law 101–649) is amended—

7 (1) in subsection (a), by inserting before the pe8 riod at the end of the first sentence the following:

9 ‘‘and in fiscal year 1995 a number of immigrant

10 visas equal to the number of such visas provided
2

•HR 3859 IH

1 (but not made available) under this section in pre2 vious fiscal years’’; and

3 (2) in the next to last sentence of subsection

4 (c), by striking ‘‘or 1993’’ and inserting ‘‘, 1993, or

5 1994’’.

Æ
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)

In connection with this Report on Form 10-Q for the three and nine months ended June 30, 2019, or the Report, of PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd., or the Registrant, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Arthur H. Penn, Chief Executive Officer of the Registrant, hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge, that:

 

|        |     |                                                                                                                                        |
|--------|-----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and |

 

|        |     |                                                                                                                                                         |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant. |

 

|                                                       |
|-------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                  |
| /s/ Arthur H. Penn                                    |
| Name:  Arthur H. Penn                       |
| Title:    Chief Executive Officer |
| Date:    August 7, 2019      |
#### Lattie G. BROWN, Petitioner, v. BIRDSEYE DIVISION OF GENERAL FOODS CORPORATION, Hartford Accident and Indemnity Company, American Motorists Insurance Company, and the Florida Industrial Commission, Respondents.

No. 36143.

Supreme Court of Florida.

June 21, 1967.

Clifton L. Howell, Jr. and Phipps & Linn, for petitioner.

Calvin A. Pope and Peter P. Behuniak, Pope & Burton, Tampa, Patrick H. Mears, Tallahassee, and J. Franklin Garner, Lake-land, for respondents.

PER CURIAM.

We have examined the record and briefs and have heard oral argument. We find *178that in entering the order under attack the respondent Commission did not depart from the essential requirements of the law. The petition for writ of certiorari is therefore denied.

The petition for attorney’s fees is also denied.

It is so ordered.

THORNAL, C. J., and THOMAS, ROBERTS, CALDWELL and BARNS (Ret.), JJ., concur.
M E M O R A N D U M 

To: Docket EPA-R09-OAR-2012-0713, Docket EPA- R09-OAR-2012-0721

From: Wienke Tax, EPA Region IX, Air Planning Office

Date: September 14, 2012

Concerning: EPA Proposed Rules, Finding of Substantial Inadequacy of Implementation Plan; 

Call for California State Implementation Plan Revision; South Coast, and 

Disapproval of Implementation Plan Revisions; State of California; South Coast 

VMT Emissions Offset Demonstrations - Conference Call Notes, Conference 

Call, September 14, 2012.

_____________________________

On Friday, September 14, 2012, EPA Region 9 staff and managers Elizabeth Adams, Jefferson 

Wehling, Jeanhee Hong, Carol Bohnenkamp, Karina O’Connor, and Wienke Tax participated in 

a conference call with staff and managers from the South Coast Air Quality Management District

(SCAQMD) Elaine Chang, Henry Hogo, Joseph Cassmassi, Philip Fine, Barbara Baird, Bill 

Wong, and Laki Tisopulos. The purpose of the conference call was to discuss EPA’s proposals 

regarding the 1-hour ozone SIP call for South Coast, and the requirement for the South Coast to 

submit new VMT emission offset demonstrations for 1-hour and 8-hour ozone. SCAQMD staff 

also clarified that they will be submitting a status update on the implementation of their approved 

8-hour ozone plan.

In connection with the 1-hour ozone SIP call, EPA indicated that the Agency had issued the SIP 

call for the attainment demonstration under 182(c)(2)(A) only. If EPA were to add any additional 

requirements to the SIP call, EPA indicated that the Agency would have to re-propose the action.

EPA also indicated that reliance on section 182(e)(5)("New technologies") for attainment 

demonstration purposes could be the subject of a future challenge if EPA were to approve a plan 

with such reliance. SCAQMD asked whether EPA had any particular format in mind for the 1-

hour ozone attainment demonstration (e.g., as a separate chapter, or separate appendix, etc.), and 

EPA expressed no preference in that regard other than to present 1-hour ozone material 

separately from 8-hour ozone and other pollutant material where possible to allow for separate 

evaluation and action (if needed). In connection with the VMT offset demonstration, SCAQMD 

indicated they will be using EMFAC2011 and EPA indicated that the Agency had no objection

to its use.

The agenda associated with this conference call is attached to this memorandum. 
AQMD/U.S.EPA Region 9 call

9/14/2012

Agenda

8-hour ozone SIP update

Revision, update, SIP commitments

Revised inventory

Additional requirements based on new inventory

Attainment demonstration

1-hour ozone SIP

Required Elements

RFP: Applicability of 15% VOC reduction; milestone years

Contingency (182(e)(5))

Applicability of Section 182(g)(5) Economic Incentive Program?

Timing/format

VMT offset demonstration

1-hour

8-hour

2007 or 2011 EMFAC
Exhibit 32.1

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEYACT OF 2002**

In connection with the annual report of JA Energy Inc. (the“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the three months ended November 30, 2014, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commissionon the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Edward Zimbardi, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, to the bestof my knowledge and belief, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002, that:

i.	The Report fully complieswith the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and

ii.	The information containedin the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: April 20, 2015

 

 

 

/s/ Barry Hall	

Barry Hall,

(Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer)
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)

In connection with this Report on Form 10-Q for the three and six months ended March 31, 2020, or the Report, of PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd., or the Registrant, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Aviv Efrat, Chief Financial Officer of the Registrant, hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge, that:

 

|        |     |                                                                                                                                        |
|--------|-----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and |

 

|        |     |                                                                                                                                                         |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant. |

 

|                                                       |
|-------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                  |
| /s/ Aviv Efrat                                        |
| Name:  Aviv Efrat                           |
| Title:    Chief Financial Officer |
| Date:    May 11, 2020             |
Attachment 4

Public Notice

Rule 323.1
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4007 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4007

  To amend the Water Supply Act of 1958 to provide for the funding of 
    capital improvements at the Washington Aqueduct, and for other 
                               purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 10, 1994

 Mr. Moran (for himself and Ms. Norton) introduced the following bill; 
 which was referred to the Committee on Public Works and Transportation

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend the Water Supply Act of 1958 to provide for the funding of 
    capital improvements at the Washington Aqueduct, and for other 
                               purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS AT WASHINGTON AQUEDUCT.

    Section 301 of the Water Supply Act of 1958 (43 U.S.C. 390b) is 
amended by adding at the end the following new subsection:
    ``(e) Notwithstanding any other provision of law--
            ``(1) the Chief of Engineers of the Army Corps of Engineers 
        may borrow from the Federal Financing Bank such amounts as the 
        Chief determines are necessary to finance capital improvements 
        at the Washington Aqueduct;
            ``(2) upon request of the Chief, the Board of Directors of 
        the Federal Financing Bank shall make loans to the Chief for 
        the purpose described in paragraph (1); and
            ``(3) any amounts borrowed by the Chief under this 
        subsection shall be repaid by users of the Washington Aqueduct 
        over such period of time, and shall be subject to such other 
        terms and conditions, as the Board determines to be 
        appropriate.''.

                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 32.1

Certification required by Rule 13a-14(b) or

Rule 15d-14(b) and Section 906 of

the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Dominion Resources Black Warrior Trust (the Trust) on Form 10-K for the period ended
December 31, 2014, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, not in its individual capacity but solely as the trustee of the Trust, certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to its knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Trust.
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|               |  |  |  |                                                                    |  |                             
|-------------- |  |  |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------ |  | ----------------------------
|               |  |  |  | SOUTHWEST BANK, TRUSTEE FOR
DOMINION RESOURCES BLACK WARRIOR TRUST
|               |  |  | 
|March 23, 2015 |  |  |  | By:                                                                |  | /s/ Ron E. Hooper           
|               |  |  |  |                                                                    |  | Ron E. Hooper,              
|               |  |  |  |                                                                    |  | SVP Royalty Trust Management
|               |  |  |  |                                                                    |  | Southwest Bank              

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Dominion Resources Black Warrior
Trust and will be retained by Dominion Resources Black Warrior Trust and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### Napoleon HOWARD, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 72-734.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

July 31, 1973.

*706Napoleon Howard, in pro. per.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and William W. Herring, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Howard appeals the denial of his petition for post-conviction relief. In his petition Howard alleged that his 1958 conviction and ten-year sentence for armed robbery was invalid by reason of having been rendered without the assistance of counsel in violation of the Sixth and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution; and, furthermore, that such prior alleged invalid conviction was used to enhance a later sentence of twelve years imposed upon appellant for a subsequent conviction of another crime of robbery. We are of the opinion that Howard is entitled to an evidentiary hearing based upon the rationale of State v. Reynolds, Fla.1970, 238 So.2d 598; Lawson v. State, Fla.1970, 231 So.2d 205; Wilcox v. State, Fla.App.1972, 267 So.2d 15; Wilcox v. State, Fla.App.1972, 269 So.2d 420; and Lenwood v. State, Fla.App.1973, Second District Court of Appeal, 278 So.2d 323. At such evidentiary hearing it would be incumbent upon Howard to prove by the preponderance of the evidence that (1) at the time of his 1958 robbery conviction he was indigent and unable to employ an attorney and (2) he did not knowingly waive his right to counsel. Based upon the aforementioned decisions, and in particular United States v. Tucker, 1972, 404 U.S. 443, 92 S.Ct. 589, 30 L.Ed.2d 592, the trial judge should consider the extent to which the imposition of the subsequent sentence was based upon the prior conviction if it is determined that the prior conviction was invalid. See Lenwood v. State, supra. The order appealed from is vacated and the cause is remanded with instructions that defendant be granted an evidentiary hearing consistent herewith,

CROSS, OWEN and MAGER, JJ., concur.