alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
froz_ex102.htm


Exhibit 10.2


 




  IN THE CIRCUIT COURT IN THE TWELFTH JUDICIAL CIRCillT IN AND FOR SARASOTA COUNTY, FLORIDA




 



CIVIL ACTION NO. 


20 14 CA 000862 NC









IBC Funds, LLC,


a Nevada Limited Liability Company,


 


Plaintiff,


 


-against-


 


Frozen Food Gift Group, Inc.,


a Delaware Corporation,


 


Defendant.


 



ORDER GRANTING APPROVAL OF 


SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT  AND STIPULATION




This matter having come on for a hearing on the 14th day of February , 2014, to approve the Settlement Agreement entered into as of February 12, 2014 between Plaintiff , IBC Funds, LLC ("Plaintiff'') and Defendant, Frozen Food Gift Group, Inc. ("Defendant" and collectively with Plaintiff, the "Parties"), and the Court having held a hearing as to the fairness of the terms and conditions of the Settlement Agreement and Stipulation and being otherwise fully advised in the premises, the Court hereby finds as follows:


 


1. The Court has been advised that the Parties intend that the sale of the Shares (as defined by the Settlement Agreement and, hereinafter, the "Shares") to and the resale of the Shares by Plaintiff in the United States, assuming satisfaction of all other applicable securities laws and regulations , will be exempt from registration under the Securities Act of 1933 (the "Securities Act") in reliance upon Section 3(a)(10) of the Securities Act based upon tl1is Court's finding herein that the terms and conditions of the issuance of the Shares by Defendant to Plaintiff are fair to Plaintiff;


 


2. The hearing having been scheduled upon the consent of Plaintiff and Defendant, Plaintiff has had adequate notice of the hearing and Plaintiff is the only party to whom Shares will be issued pursuant to the Settlement Agreement;


 


3. The terms and conditions of the issuance of the Shares in exchange for the release of certain claims as set forth in the Settlement Agreement are fair to Plaintiff, the only party to whom the Shares will be issued;


 


4. The fairness hearing was open to Plaintiff. Plaintiff was represented by counsel at the hearing who acknowledged that adequate notice of the hearing was given and consented to the entry of this Order.


It is  hereby  ORDERED  AND  ADJUDGED  that  the  Settlement  Agreement  and Stipulation is hereby approved as fair to the party to whom the Shares will be issued, within the meaning of Section 3(a)(10) of the Securities Act and that the sale of the Shares to Plaintiff and the resale of the Shares in the United States by Plaintiff, assuming satisfaction of all other applicable securities laws and regulations , will be exempt from registration WJder the Securities Act of 1933.


 


so ORDERED, this      day of         , 201;ORIGINAL SIGNED --=


 







FEB 14 2014


 







I<IMBERLY CARLTON BONNER


                              CIRCIJ'T JJ,IDGE                                   


The Honorable                                   __                      __


 












Conf01med copies to: 


Charles N. Cleland, Jr., Esq. 


Michael G. Brown, Esq.
<PAGE>


                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.3

                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

The Board of Directors
24/7 Media, Inc.:

         We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration
statement on Form S-3 of 24/7 Media, Inc. of our report dated March 10, 2000,
relating to the consolidated balance sheets of Sabela Media, Inc. and
subsidiaries as of December 31, 1999 and 1998, and the related consolidated
statements of operations and comprehensive income, stockholders' equity and cash
flows for the year ended December 31, 1999 and the period from June 29, 1998
(inception) to December 31, 1998, which report appears in the Current Report on
Form 8-KA of 24/7 Media, Inc. dated March 24, 2000.



                                  /s/ KPMG LLP
                             --------------------------
                                      KPMG LLP

Los Angeles, California
September 26, 2000
#### Albert C. BOSTWICK, Jr., Appellant, v. Mollie Netcher BOSTWICK, Appellee.

No. 70-848.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Dec. 22, 1970.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Palm Beach County; James R. Knott, Judge.

Appeal dismissed.
Top State-to-State Migration Flows

2010-2011

 1

2 

Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 2011 American Community Survey.

3 

Florida to Georgia: 42,666 

5 New Jersey to 

 New York: 41,450

6 New York to 

 New Jersey: 40,815

7 

8 

9 

10 

California to 

Arizona: 49,635

California to Washington: 38,421

California to Nevada: 40,114

California to Texas: 58,992

Texas to California 37,087 New York to Florida: 59,288

Georgia to Florida: 38,658

4
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION



I, Allen J. Berning, Chief Executive Officer of Pemstar Inc. (the Company), certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that;



| | 1. | The Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the annual period ended March 31, 2004 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Date: June 11, 2004



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ Allen J. Berning   
|Allen J. Berning       
|Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 99.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED  PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, each of the undersigned officers of Credit Suisse First Boston (USA), Inc., a Delaware corporation (the "Company"), does hereby certify, to such officer's
knowledge, that:

The
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002 of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company for such annual period presented.

March
27, 2003

| |  |  | /s/JOHN J. MACKName: John J. Mack
Title: Chief Executive Officer
| |  |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------

March
27, 2003

| |  |  | /s/DAVID C. FISHERName: David C. Fisher
Title: Chief Financial and Accounting Officer
| |  |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

---

QuickLinks
03/03/201 0 1G:3 5 FA X 202493514 2 FA A+ DM S lgl002/00 3 _!ii^yj./^«x v±0: 1 < rA A4;: a :iz f iuu 7 AN M 7 ®002/00 3

SCOITR

. Moiuy s FAA Ol'FIC

EO FREOIONAI

. COUNSE

L 160 1 LINDAVE.

. S W RKNTON , WASHINGTO N9805 7 'IT-LFP l lONE: 425.2 2 7.141 7 FACSIMILE : 425.227.100 7

I n ih e Matte r

of: Sk y Wes t Airline s 

## UNITE D STATE S O FAMERIC A

DEPARTMEN T O FTRANSPORTATIO N OFFIC EO FHEARING S WASHINGTON , D.C

.

FA A DOCKH T C F09NM001 2 FA A Cas e No

. 2009NM06004 2 DM S No

. FAA-2009-097 9 Judg e Goodwi n

COMPLAINANT' S 1 " SUPPLEMENTA LRESPONS ET O RESPONDENTS ' INITIA L DISCOVER Y REQUES T Complainant , throug hhi s undersigne dcounsel , hereb y supplement s it s initia l respons e t o Respondent' s Initia l discover y request , serve do n Januar y 22 , 2010 , a s follows :



## REQUEST S FO RPRODUCTIO N O FDOCUMENT S REQUES T N0.3 : Aii y an dal l document s th e FA A wil l o r ma y see k

t o introduc e a s exhibit s at

an y tria l o r

hearin g i n thi s action

. Answer : Se c auache drecor do f Sk y West' s violatio n history

. ( 7 pages )
REQUES T N0.5 : An y documen t create db y Joa n Peterso n relatin g t o Sk y Wes t de-icin g operation s fro mFebruar y 1 , 200 9 t o present
. Answer : Se e attache dEP I 3.1. 7 entrie s fo r he r 2/10/0 9 de-icin g inspection

. ( 8 pages )

Submitte dthi s 1 s t

da y o f Marc h2010 ,

Jcot t R

. Mom s FA A Attorne y03/03/201 0 16:3 5 FA X 202493514 2 U^/Ui./2Ul U ].3:1 7 FA X 42 5 22 7 100 7 FA A A^fM- 7 * DM S @|003/00 3 121003/00 3

1 2 3 4 S € 7
9 3. 0 1 1 1 2 1 3 1 4 1 5 I S 1 7 1 6 1 9 2 0 2 1 2 2 2 3 2 4 2 5 2 « 2 7 2 8 2 9 3 0 3 1 3 2 3 3 3 4 3 S 3 6 3 7 3 9 3 9 4 0 4 1 4 2 4. T 4 4 4 S 4 £ 4 7 4 8 4 9 5 0 5 1 S 2 6 3 V_
.



### CERTIFICAT EO FSERVIC E I hereb y cenif

y tha t th e foregoin g Complainant' s 1^' Supplemental Respons e t o Respondent' s Initia l Discovery Reques t ha s bee n serve dvi afacsimil e an dcertifie dmai l - RemrnReceip t Requeste dthi s date , to th e following :

Th e Honorabl e Richar dC , Goodwi n(withou t exhibits ) Offic e o f hearings , M-2 0 120 0 Ne w Jerse y Avenue , S.E

. Eas t Buildin g Groun dFloor , RmHI2-32 0 Washington , D.C

. 2059 0 ThL : 202.366.213 9 FAX : 202.366,753 6
Federa l Aviatio n Administratio n(withou t exhibits ) 80 0 Independenc e Avenu e S W Washington , D.C

. 2059 1 Attn : Heai-ing Docke t

Clerk , AGC-43 0 Wilbu r Wrigh t Buildin g - Suiu

j 2W100 0 FAX : 202.493.514 2

' J od dC , Emerson , Esq

. Sk y Wes t Airline s 44 4 Sout hRive r Roa d St

. George , U T 8479 0 TEL : 435.634.353 0 FAX : 435.634.350 5

Date dthi s I " day o f

March , 2010

. 

## ^i/

- 

# :^^ii=

. x i l 

### MOIFAIRCHIN Offic e o f Regional Counse l (ANM-7 ) Federa l Aviatio nAdministratio n 160 1 LindAvc

. SW Renton , W A9805 7 425.227.216 0

CompluinonC s •"Suppleineitlu l Respons e t o Respondent' s Iniiial Discovery Rcqucr t -SkyWcsi Airline s - CPO9NMD01 2 Pag e 2 of 2 SC O r r R

. MORRIS , f

A AATroRNif

Y I KL : 425.227.1417 ; FAX : 425.227,100 7
I

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 3972

To designate the visitors center at Warm Springs Dam, California, as the

‘‘Milt Brandt Visitors Center’’.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 8, 1994

Mr. HAMBURG introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Public Works and Transportation

A BILL

To designate the visitors center at Warm Springs Dam,

California, as the ‘‘Milt Brandt Visitors Center’’.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

4 The visitors center at the Warm Springs Dam compo5 nent of the project for flood control, Russian River, Dry

6 Creek, California, authorized by section 203 of the Flood

7 Control Act of 1962 (76 Stat. 1192), is designated as the

8 ‘‘Milt Brandt Visitors Center’’.
2

•HR 3972 IH

1 SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

2 Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document,

3 paper, or other record of the United States to the visitors

4 center referred to in section 1 shall be deemed to be a

5 reference to the ‘‘Milt Brandt Visitors Center’’.

Æ
<PAGE>
 
                                                                    EXHIBIT 12.2
 
                           SECURITY CAPITAL ATLANTIC
                                  INCORPORATED
 
           COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO COMBINED FIXED CHARGES
                         AND PREFERRED STOCK DIVIDENDS
                         (DOLLAR AMOUNTS IN THOUSANDS)
                                  (UNAUDITED)
 
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                              PERIOD ENDED DECEMBER 31,
                                       ---------------------------------------
                                        1997    1996    1995    1994   1993(1)
                                       ------- ------- ------- ------- -------
<S>                                    <C>     <C>     <C>     <C>     <C>
Earnings from operations.............. $51,115 $32,998 $19,639 $ 9,926  $ 38
Add:
  Interest expense....................  20,292  16,181  19,042   9,240   --
                                       ------- ------- ------- -------  ----
Earnings, as adjusted................. $71,407 $49,179 $38,681 $19,166  $ 38
                                       ======= ======= ======= =======  ====
Combined fixed charges and preferred
 stock dividends:
  Interest expense.................... $20,292 $16,181 $19,042 $ 9,240  $--
  Capitalized interest................  10,169  10,250   4,404     793   --
                                       ------- ------- ------- -------  ----
    Total fixed charges...............  30,461  26,431  23,446  10,033   --
Preferred stock dividends.............   1,569     --      --      --    --
                                       ------- ------- ------- -------  ----
Combined fixed charges and preferred
 stock dividends...................... $32,030 $26,431 $23,446 $10,033  $ --
                                       ======= ======= ======= =======  ====
Ratio of earnings to combined fixed
 charges and preferred stock
 dividends............................     2.2     1.9     1.6     1.9   N/A
                                       ======= ======= ======= =======  ====
</TABLE>
--------
(1) For the period from inception (October 26, 1993) to December 31, 1993.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Alanzo Thomas, Appellant.

Appeal unanimously dismissed *(see, People v Skaar,*97 AD2d 484). (Appeal from Judgment of Supreme Court, Erie County, Notaro, J.—Violation of Proba*1069tion.) Present—Callahan, J. P., Doerr, Boomer, Green and Balio, JJ.
1

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF IDAHO

Docket No. 40978

STATE OF IDAHO,

Plaintiff-Respondent,

v.

SHANNON LYNN MADISON,

Defendant-Appellant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

2014 Unpublished Opinion No. 305

Filed: January 6, 2014

Stephen W. Kenyon, Clerk

THIS IS AN UNPUBLISHED 

OPINION AND SHALL NOT 

BE CITED AS AUTHORITY

Appeal from the District Court of the Fourth Judicial District, State of Idaho, Ada

County. Hon. Lynn G. Norton, District Judge. 

Judgment of conviction and unified sentence of five years, with a minimum 

period of confinement of six months, for misappropriation of personal identifying 

information, and concurrent six-month determinate sentence for petit 

theft, affirmed.

Sara B. Thomas, State Appellate Public Defender; Shawn F. Wilkerson, Deputy 

Appellate Public Defender, Boise, for appellant. 

Hon. Lawrence G. Wasden, Attorney General; Lori A. Fleming, Deputy Attorney 

General, Boise, for respondent. 

________________________________________________

Before GUTIERREZ, Chief Judge; LANSING, Judge;

and MELANSON, Judge

PER CURIAM

Shannon Lynn Madison was convicted of misappropriation of personal identifying 

information, Idaho Code §§ 18-3126, 18-3128, and misdemeanor petit theft, I.C. §§ 18-2403(1), 

18-2407(2). The district court sentenced Madison to a unified term of five years, with a 

minimum period of confinement of six months, for the misappropriation charge and a concurrent 

determinate term of six months for the petit theft. Madison appeals, contending that her sentence 

is excessive.
2

Sentencing is a matter for the trial court’s discretion. Both our standard of review and the 

factors to be considered in evaluating the reasonableness of the sentence are well established and 

need not be repeated here. See State v. Hernandez, 121 Idaho 114, 117-18, 822 P.2d 1011, 1014-

15 (Ct. App. 1991); State v. Lopez, 106 Idaho 447, 449-51, 680 P.2d 869, 871-73 (Ct. App. 

1984); State v. Toohill, 103 Idaho 565, 568, 650 P.2d 707, 710 (Ct. App. 1982). When reviewing 

the length of a sentence, we consider the defendant’s entire sentence. State v. Oliver, 144 Idaho 

722, 726, 170 P.3d 387, 391 (2007). Applying these standards, and having reviewed the record 

in this case, we cannot say that the district court abused its discretion.

Therefore, Madison’s judgment of conviction and sentence are affirmed.
In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

No. 02-22-00431-CV

MICHAEL DAMIEN DUNN, Appellant

V.

PAMELA SUE DUNN, Appellee

§

§

§

§

On Appeal from the 442nd District 

Court

of Denton County (19-3053-442)

August 31, 2023

Memorandum Opinion by Justice 

Bassel

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that there 

was no error in the trial court’s divorce decree. It is ordered that the divorce decree is 

affirmed. 

It is further ordered that Appellant Michael Damien Dunn shall pay all costs of 

this appeal, for which let execution issue.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS 

By /s/ Dabney Bassel

 Justice Dabney Bassel
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

A.L., the mother,

Appellant,

v.

DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES and

GUARDIAN AD LITEM,

Appellees.

No. 4D20-2631 

[March 22, 2021]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, 

Indian River County; Michael J. Linn, Judge; L.T. Case No. 

312020DP000085.

Antony P. Ryan, Regional Counsel, and Richard G. Bartmon, 

Assistant Regional Counsel, Office of Criminal Conflict and Civil Regional 

Counsel, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Andrew Feigenbaum of Children's Legal Services, West Palm Beach, 

for appellee Department of Children and Families. 

Thomasina F. Moore, Statewide Director of Appeals, and Laura J. Lee, 

Senior Attorney, Appellate Division, Statewide Guardian ad Litem Office, 

Tallahassee, for appellee Guardian ad Litem on behalf of C.H. and J.L.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

LEVINE, C.J., GROSS and KLINGENSMITH, JJ., concur. 

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
Exhibit 10.13






Exhibit 10.13


DESCRIPTION OF COMPENSATION ARRANGEMENTS 
FOR NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTORS 
For the period between each annual meeting of shareholders, non-employee directors receive the following compensation: 
		
	•
	annual retainer - $75,000, payable at the director’s election in shares of State Street common stock or in cash; 


		
	•
	meeting fees - $1,500 for each Board and committee meeting attended, together with reimbursement of expenses incurred as a result of attending such meetings, payable in cash; 


		
	•
	an annual common stock award in an amount of shares equal to $130,000 divided by the closing price of the stock on the date of the annual meeting that begins the period (with additional stock amounts to reflect dividends if the award is deferred); 


		
	•
	a pro-rated annual retainer and annual common stock award for any director joining the Board after the  annual meeting that begins the period; 


		
	•
	an additional annual retainer for the Lead Director of $90,000, payable at the director’s election in shares of State Street common stock or in cash; 


		
	•
	an additional annual retainer for the Examining and Audit Committee Chair and for the Risk and Capital Committee Chair of $25,000, payable at the director’s election in shares of State Street common stock or in cash; 


		
	•
	an additional annual retainer for the Chairs of the Executive Compensation Committee and the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee of $15,000, payable at the director’s election in shares of State Street common stock or in cash; and 


		
	•
	an additional annual retainer for each member of the Examining and Audit Committee and for each member of the Risk and Capital Committee, other than the Chairs, of $10,000, payable at the director’s election in shares of State Street common stock or in cash. 


Pursuant to State Street’s Deferred Compensation Plan for Directors, directors may elect to defer the receipt of 0% or 100% of their (1) retainers, (2) meeting fees, or (3) annual award of shares of common stock. Directors also may elect to receive all of their retainers in cash or shares of common stock. Directors who elect to defer the cash payment of their retainers or meeting fees may also make notional investment elections with respect to those deferrals, with a choice of notional investment fund returns. To the extent the amounts are deferred they will (a) be paid as elected by the director, on either the date of the director’s termination of service on the Board or on the earlier of such termination and a future date specified, and (b) be paid in the form elected by the director as either a lump sum or in installments over a two- to five-year period.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

###### Department of the Army

          - 32 CFR Part 508
          - [Docket ID: USA-2017-HQ-0010]
          - RIN 0702-AA83

# AGENCY:

Department of the Army, DoD.

# ACTION:

Final rule.

# SUMMARY:

This final rule removes the Department of the Army's regulation concerning participation of Army bands on and off post. This part has been superseded by requirements which direct appropriate participation of U.S. military bands on and off post. This part conveys internal Army policy and procedures and is unnecessary. Therefore, this part should be removed from the CFR.

# DATES:

This rule is effective on August 27, 2018.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Jennifer Williams at 757-462-1060.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Public comment on the removal of 32 CFR part 508 is not required because the regulation involves a matter relating to agency management and personnel, and because the regulation is a general statement of policy.

                    DoD internal guidance will continue to be published in Army Regulation 220-90, “Army Music,” available at                     *https://armypubs.army.mil/​ProductMaps/​PubForm/​AR.aspx.*

This rule is not significant under Executive Order (E.O.) 12866, “Regulatory Planning and Review,” therefore, E.O. 13771, “Reducing Regulation and Controlling Regulatory Costs” does not apply.

# List of Subjects in 32 CFR Part 508

      - Music
      - Utilization of Army bands

# PART 508—[REMOVED]

Accordingly, by the authority of 5 U.S.C. 301, 32 CFR part 508 is removed.

Brenda S. Bowen,

Army Federal Register Liaison Officer.

[FR Doc. 2018-18480 Filed 8-24-18; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE 5001-03-P