alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Melvin A. ROBINSON, Dorothy G. Robinson, Daniel Melnick, Janice Melnick, Nick Basiliko and Helen Basiliko, Appellants, v. LOYOLA FOUNDATION, INC., a non-profit corporation, Appellee.

No. 39636.

Supreme Court of Florida.

March 24, 1971.

Paul R. Stern, Daytona Beach, for appellants.

Ossinsky & Krol, Daytona Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM:

Upon consideration of appellants’ motion to remand the case to the trial court and *863appellee’s motion to compel modification of the supersedeas order previously entered by the District Court of Appeal, it is

Ordered that the motion to remand the cause to the trial court made by appellants be and the same is hereby denied. It is further

Ordered that the appellants file in the trial court on or before ten days after this order is filed in the office of the Clerk of this Court, the additional supersedeas in the sum of $25,000 ordered by this Court on October 6, 1970, said bond to contain the same terms and conditions as that contained in the present supersedeas bond on file in the trial court. Failure to post such supersedeas bond within the time herein required shall entitle the appellee to proceed in the trial court with the enforcement of its judgment.

It is so ordered.

ERVIN, Acting C. J., ADKINS, and DREW (Retired), JJ., MANN, District Court Judge and CREWS, Circuit Judge, concur.
<PAGE>


                       SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                             Washington, D.C. 20549




                                    FORM 8-K




                Current Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of
                       The Securities Exchange Act of 1934




                             September 28, 2000
                Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported):





                                 SUPERGEN, INC.
                                 --------------
             (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)




   Delaware                   0-27628                      91-1841574
   --------                   -------                      ----------
(State or other             (Commission                   (IRS Employer
jurisdiction of             File Number)               Identification No.)
incorporation)


            Two Annabel Lane, Suite 220, San Ramon, California    94583
            --------------------------------------------------    -----
               (Address of principal executive offices)         (Zip Code)





       Registrant's telephone number, including area code: (925) 327-0200



<PAGE>


ITEM 5.           OTHER EVENTS

         On September 28, 2000 we announced that our board of directors has
authorized a stock repurchase program of up to one million shares of our
common stock. We expect to use existing cash to finance these repurchases. We
expect such purchases to be effected from time to time -- in the open market,
in private transactions or otherwise, subject to market conditions. No
assurance can be given as to the time period over which the shares will be
repurchased or as to whether and to what extent the share repurchases will be
consummated.

ITEM 7.           FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND EXHIBITS.

         (c)      Exhibits

             99.1   Press release dated September 28, 2000

         ----------------------------





                                      -2-
<PAGE>

                                   SIGNATURES

         Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned hereunto duly authorized.


                                       SUPERGEN, INC.



         Date:  September 28, 2000     By:   /s/ Ronald H. Spair
                                            ------------------------------------

                                       Ronald H. Spair
                                       Senior Vice President and Chief Financial
                                       Officer


                                      -3-
<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT INDEX



Exhibit No.                Description
-----------                -----------
99.1                       Press release dated September 28, 2000.

 .


                                      -4-
EXHIBIT 32



OSE USA, Inc.



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of OSE USA,
Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of our knowledge, that:



| | (1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                      |  |                                                                     
|--------------------- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------
|DATED: March 25, 2004 |  | /s/    EDMOND
TSENG                                                 
|                      |  | Edmond Tseng                                                        
|                      |  | President, Chief Executive Officer andActing Chief Financial Officer
|                      | 
|DATED: March 25, 2004 |  | /s/    ELTON
LI                                                     
|                      |  | Elton Li                                                            
|                      |  | Corporate Controller andChief Accounting Officer
**EXHIBIT 23.1**

 

**CONSENT OF CHAPMAN PETROLEUM ENGINEERING, LTD**

**INDEPENDENT PETROLEUM ENGINEERS**

 

To the Board of Directors

BMB Munai, Inc.

 

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on Form S-3 (No. 333-146831) of BMB Munai, Inc. of our “Reserve and Economics Evaluation” dated April 1, 2008 included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended March 31, 2008. 

 

/s/ Chapman Petroleum Engineering, Ltd.

 

Chapman Petroleum Engineering, Ltd.

Calgary, Alberta, Canada

June 16, 2008
Certification of CEO and CFO Pursuant to 
18 U.S.C. Section 1350,



As Adopted Pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Firsthand Technology Value Fund, Inc. (the “Company”) for the quarter ended September 30, 2019, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), Kevin Landis and Omar Billawala, as Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:



|(1) | The report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 134; and
|--- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                                        | 
|----------------------------------------------------------------------- | 
|Name: Kevin LandisTitle: Chief Executive OfficerDated: November 8, 2019 | 
|                                                                        | 
|Name: Omar BillawalaTitle: Financial OfficerDated: November 8, 2019     |
# C_2014244EN.01001401.xml

| 26.7.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 244/14 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.7.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 244/14

---

Explanatory Notes to the Combined Nomenclature of the European Union

2014/C 244/07

Pursuant to the second indent of Article 9(1)(a) of Council Regulation (EEC) No 2658/87 (1), the explanatory notes to the Combined Nomenclature of the European Union (2) are hereby amended as follows:

1

2

On page 101, the second paragraph of the explanatory notes to subheadings ‘2403 10 10 and 2403 10 90 Smoking tobacco, whether or not containing tobacco substitutes in any proportion’ is replaced by the following:

On page 101, the second paragraph of the explanatory notes to subheadings ‘2403 10 10 and 2403 10 90 Smoking tobacco, whether or not containing tobacco substitutes in any proportion’

‘Waste resulting from the manipulation of tobacco leaves or from the manufacture of tobacco products which is capable of being smoked is considered as smoking tobacco if it does not meet the description of cigars, cigarillos or cigarettes (see the explanatory notes to subheadings 2402 10 00 and 2402 20 10 and 2402 20 90).’

---

(1)  Council Regulation (EEC) No 2658/87 of 23 July 1987 on the tariff and statistical nomenclature and on the Common Customs Tariff (OJ L 256, 7.9.1987, p. 1).

1

(2)  OJ C 137, 6.5.2011, p. 1.

2

---
<PAGE>   1
                                                                  EXHIBIT 10.58

                                FIRST AMENDMENT
                              TO OPTION AGREEMENT

         This First Amendment to Option Agreement is hereby made to amend that
certain Option Agreement entered into by and between D. Michael Talla, an
individual, and TTO Partners, a California limited partnership, on the one hand
(collectively, "Optionors"), and Sports Club, Inc. of California, a California
corporation ("Optionee"), on the other, on October 20, 1994 ("Option
Agreement") as follows:

1.       Paragraph 3.1 is hereby amended by deleting the first line thereof and
adding in its place and stead the following:

         "3.1.   The date, if any, upon which Optionors cease to control at a
minimum 15% of the outstanding Common Stock of The Sports Club Company, Inc.;
or"

2.       All other terms and conditions of the Option Agreement shall remain in
full force and effect.


Dated as of May 27, 1997


OPTIONORS:                /s/ D. Michael Talla              
                          --------------------------------------
                          D. Michael Talla, an individual



                          TTO Partners,
                          a California limited partnership

                          By:   Talla Development Company,
                                a California corporation, as
                                General Partner



                          By:  /s/ D. Michael Talla              
                               ----------------------------------
                                D. Michael Talla, President




OPTIONEE;                 Sports, Club, Inc. of California,
                          a California corporation




                          By: /s/ John M. Gibbons               
                              ----------------------------------
                              John M. Gibbons, President
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3397 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3397

     To direct the President to establish a commission for making 
  recommendations to improve the Federal emergency management system.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 28, 1993

  Mr. Andrews of New Jersey (for himself, Mr. Hoyer, and Mr. Weldon) 
   introduced the following bill; which was referred jointly to the 
    Committees on Public Works and Transportation and Armed Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
     To direct the President to establish a commission for making 
  recommendations to improve the Federal emergency management system.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Presidential FEMA Reform Act of 
1993''.

SEC. 2. COMMISSION ON FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT REFORM.

    (a) Establishment.--Not later than 90 days after the date of the 
enactment of this Act, the President shall establish a commission to 
review the Federal emergency management system for the purpose of 
making recommendations for improving such system.
    (b) Composition.--The commission established under this section 
shall be composed of such members as the President shall appoint. Such 
members may include--
            (1) representatives of the emergency management community;
            (2) representatives of State and local governments, 
        including governments having jurisdiction over areas which have 
        recently been struck by disasters and emergencies which 
        warranted a Federal response; and
            (3) officials of the Federal Government who have 
        responsibilities for responding to disasters and emergencies.

SEC. 3. REPORT.

    (a) In General.--Not later than 1 year after the date of its 
establishment under section 2, the commission shall submit to the 
President and Congress a report which makes specific recommendations 
for improving the Federal emergency management system.
    (b) Minimum Requirements.--The report under this section shall 
include, at a minimum, specific recommendations for--
            (1) administrative reform in existing agencies that have 
        responsibility for responding to disasters and emergencies in 
        the United States;
            (2) Federal legislation necessary to implement the 
        recommendations of the commission; and
            (3) improving State and local emergency management systems.

                                 <all>
```
#### STATE of Oklahoma, ex rel. Joseph A. WIDEMAN, Eighth District Attorney, Petitioner, v. The Honorable Neal BEEKMAN, Noble County District Judge, Respondent.

No. O 92-0907.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma.

Oct. 2, 1992.

*662ORDER GRANTING PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS

Petitioner has filed with this Court a petition for a writ of mandamus directing the Honorable Neal Beekman, District Judge of Noble County, to order complete discovery by the Defendant in Case No. CRF-91-84 in accordance with *Allen v. District Court,*803 P.2d 1164 (Okl.Cr.1990). The State asks the defense be compelled to provide complete and accurate summaries of the testimony of each of the witnesses listed by the Defendant in its Amended List of Witnesses filed in the case. The State contends that Judge Beek-man has refused to order such summaries.

A review of the record before this Court reflects that the District Court has not required the defense to provide the State summaries of the testimony of each of the witnesses to be called at trial. The objective purpose of *Allen*was to create appropriate discovery procedures in criminal cases. Collaterally, *Allen*also seeks to make sure counsel is prepared for trial by requiring counsel, in advance of trial, to interview their witnesses and to know what the witnesses’ testimony will be. This will ensure effective preparation for trial to prevent a basis for an ineffective assistance of counsel complaint for failure to prepare.

Defense counsel, in this case, asserts that “it’s not my nature to talk to [witnesses who are not eye witnesses and are talking about things that may or may not be used by the defense during the course of the trial] until just before trial and sometimes as they’re sitting in the hallway before the trial starts”. (September 10,1992, Tr. 8). This method of preparation allows an attorney to subvert the objective requirement of proper discovery in a criminal case and should not be permitted.

*Allen*requires that the defense disclose the relevant oral, written or recorded statement, or summaries of same, of witnesses whom the defense intends to call at trial. *Allen*at 1168, as modified by *Richie v. District Court,*837 P.2d 479 (1992). Defense counsel cannot subvert the requirements of *Allen*by lack of preparation.

Accordingly, the State’s petition for a writ of mandamus is hereby GRANTED. This matter is REMANDED to the District Court to order defense counsel to disclose to the State the relevant oral, written or recorded statement, or summaries of same, of witnesses whom the defense intends to call at trial which shall be completed at least ten days prior to trial.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

*/&/*James F. Lane JAMES F. LANE, Presiding Judge

/s/ Gary L, Lumpkin GARY L. LUMPKIN, Vice Presiding Judge

/s/ Tom Brett TOM BRETT, Judge

/s/ Charles A. Johnson CHARLES A. JOHNSON, Judge
258 La. 974

#### Roberto PEREZ v. AMERICAN MARINE CORPORATION, the Fidelity and Casualty Company of New York, et al.

No. 51507.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

June 16, 1971.

In re: Junior Selle, John Zeairs and the Fidelity and Casualty Company of New York applying for writs of certiorari, prohibition and mandamus.

This court will not exercise its supervisory jurisdiction and interfere with the orderly trial of cases save in cases where there is a palpable error in the ruling complained of, and then only if irreparable injury will ensue. No such showing being made, the application is denied.
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 169 (Thursday, August 30, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Page 44293]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-18837]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-4382-DR; Docket ID FEMA-2018-0001]


California; Amendment No. 1 to Notice of a Major Disaster 
Declaration

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice amends the notice of a major disaster declaration 
for the State of California (FEMA-4382-DR), dated August 4, 2018, and 
related determinations.

DATES: This amendment was issued August 17, 2018.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dean Webster, Office of Response and 
Recovery, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street SW, 
Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-2833.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The notice of a major disaster declaration 
for the State of California is hereby amended to include the following 
area among those areas determined to have been adversely affected by 
the event declared a major disaster by the President in his declaration 
of August 4, 2018.

    Lake County for Individual Assistance.

(The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA) 
are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, Community 
Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis Counseling; 
97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034, Disaster Unemployment 
Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance Grant; 97.048, 
Disaster Housing Assistance to Individuals and Households In 
Presidentially Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049, Presidentially 
Declared Disaster Assistance--Disaster Housing Operations for 
Individuals and Households; 97.050 Presidentially Declared Disaster 
Assistance to Individuals and Households--Other Needs; 97.036, 
Disaster Grants--Public Assistance (Presidentially Declared 
Disasters); 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant.)

Brock Long,
Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.
[FR Doc. 2018-18837 Filed 8-29-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 9110-12-P
----

Decision No 1/95 of the EC-Turkey Association Council of 22 December 1995 on implementing the final phase of the Customs Union

Decision No 2/97 of the EC-Turkey Association Council of 4 June 1997 establishing the list of Community instruments relating to the removal of technical barriers to trade and the conditions and arrangements governing their implementation by Turkey,

Article 4(a) to Annex I

Paragraph V (2) to Annex II

Types of gas and the corresponding supply pressures according to Article 2(2) of Council Directive 90/396/EEC of 29 June 1990

(2005/C 11/02)

(This publication is based on information received by the Commission services from Turkey)

Turkey

----

(1)  Pressure level commonly used in the ‘low pressure’ distribution network. Some other higher pressures may be used, the most usual one is 300 mbar.

(2)  Commercial propane.

(3)  Commercial propane-butane mixture.

(4)  Pressure at the inlet of the gas appliance.

----
N O T FO R PUB L ICAT IO N UNITED STATES C OUR T OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH C IR C UIT
JOEL DIAZ-AR

ANGO, Pe titione r,
v. LORETTA E. LYNC H, Attorne y Ge ne ra l, R

e sponde n t . No. 13-72544 Age n c y No. A079-149-303
M EM O R ANDUM *

On Pe tition for Re vie w of a n Orde r of the B oa rd of Im m igration Appe a ls Subm itte d

June 22, 2015 ** B e fore : HAW K INS, GR AB ER , a nd W . FLETC H ER , C irc uit Judge s . Joe l Dia z -Arango, a

native and c i tiz e n of M e xic o, pe titions for re vie w of the B oa rd of Im m igration Appe a l s’ orde r dism issing his a ppe a l from an im

m igration judge ’ s orde r de ny ing his a p plic a tion for c a

n c e l lation of re m ova l. W e have jurisdic tion unde r 8 U.S.C . § 1252. W e re vie w for substa ntia l e vide n c e the 

# FIL ED JUN 30 2015 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U
. S. CO URT O F APPEALS

* This disposition is not a ppropria te for public at ion a

nd is not pre c e de nt e xc e pt a s provide d

by 9th C ir. R . 36-3. ** The pa

ne l una nim ously c onc lude s this c a se is suita ble for de c ision without ora l a

rgum e nt. Se e Fe d. R . App. P. 34(a )(2).a ge nc y ’ s c ontinuous phy sic a l pre se nc e de te rm ination. Se rrano Gutie rre z v . Muk ase y , 521 F.3d 1114, 1116 (9th C ir. 2008). W e de ny the pe tition for re vie w. Substa ntia l e v i de nc e supports the a ge nc y ’ s de te rm ination tha t Dia z Arango’ s volunta

ry re turn to M e xic o inte rrupte d his pe riod of c ontinuous phy sic a l pre s e nc e , whe re Dia z -Arango doe s not dispute tha t he signe d a

volunta ry re turn form tha t sta t e d tha t wa s giving up the

right to a he aring be fore an im

m igration judge , the re c ord shows tha t this form

wa s re a d to him

in Spa n ish, a nd Dia z Arango te stifie d tha

t he re l i e d on a

n attorne y ’ s a dvic e in a c c e pting volunta ry re turn to M e xic o . S

e e 8 U.S.C
. § 1229b(b)(1)(A); Ibarra-Flore s v . Gonzale

s , 439 F.3d 614, 619-20 (9th C ir. 2006) (in orde r to inte rrupt the a c c um ulation of c o ntinuous phy sic a l pre se n c e , the de c ision to a c c e pt volunta ry re t urn in lie u

of a he aring be fore an im

m igration judgem

ust be knowing a

nd volunta

ry ). PE T IT IO N FO R RE V IE WDE NIE D.

1 3
- 7 2 5 4 4 2
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit 

July 7, 2008 

ERRATA

Appeal No. 2007-1276 

INTERNATIONAL TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION v. Donald C. Winter, SECRETARY OF 

THE NAVY

Decided: April 18, 2008 Precedential Opinion 

On Page 15, lines 17-19, delete the sentence “Two samples reported in Table A-8 of 

the Feasibility Study were designated as ‘CL,’ i.e., they were composed of a majority of 

clay.” In place of the deleted text, substitute the following: 

The same was true of samples described as “CH.” See Exhibit 155, at 3. 

Some samples described in Tables A-3 and A-4 of the Feasibility Study 

were designated “CH.”