### 27880 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 93 / Friday, May 13, 2011 / Rules and Regulations

T ABLE 

### 3—N EW 

### M ATERIAL 

### I NCORPORATED BY 

### R EFERENCE

Document Issue Date

Airbus A300 Airworthiness Limitation Items Document AI/SE–M2/95A.1308/07 ....................................................... .......... 4 June 2008. Airbus A310 Airworthiness Limitation Items Document AI/SE–M2/95A.1309/07 ....................................................... .......... 7 June 2008. Airbus A300–600 Airworthiness Limitation Items Document AI/SE–M2/95A.1310/07 ................................................... ...... 12 June 2008.

(2) The Director of the Federal Register previously approved the incorporation by reference of Airbus A310 Airworthiness Limitations Items Document, AI/SE–M2/ 95A.0263/06, Issue 6, dated April 2006; and Airbus Temporary Revision 6.1, including pages 1 and 2 of Section D and page 1 of Section E, dated November 2006, to Airbus A310 Airworthiness Limitations Items Document, AI/SE–M2/95A.0263/06, Issue 6, dated April 2006; on January 14, 2008 (72 FR 69612, December 10, 2007).

(3) The Director of the Federal Register previously approved the incorporation by reference of Airbus A300–600 Airworthiness Limitation Items Document AI/SE–M2/ 95A.0502/06, Issue 11, dated April 2006, on October 31, 2007 (72 FR 54536, September 26, 2007).

(4) The Director of the Federal Register previously approved the incorporation by reference of Airbus A300 Airworthiness Limitations Items Document SEM2/ 95A.1090/05, Issue 3, dated September 2005, as revised by Airbus A300 Airworthiness Limitation Items Document SEM2/95A.1090/ 05, Temporary Revision 3.1, including attachment, dated April 2006, and including attachments, dated September 2005, on April 3, 2007 (72 FR 8604, February 27, 2007).

(5) The Director of the Federal Register previously approved the incorporation by reference of Airbus Industrie A300 Supplemental Structural Inspection Document, Revision 2, dated June 1994, on August 9, 1996 (61 FR 35122, July 5, 1996).

(6) For service information identified in this AD, contact Airbus SAS–EAW (Airworthiness Office), 1 Rond Point Maurice Bellonte, 31707 Blagnac Cedex, France; telephone +33 5 61 93 36 96; fax +33 5 61 93 44 51; e-mail account.airwortheas@airbus.com; Internet http:// www.airbus.com.

(7) You may review copies of the service information at the FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, Washington. For information on the availability of this material at the FAA, call
425–227–1221.

(8) You may also review copies of the service information that is incorporated by reference at the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA). For information on the availability of this material at NARA, call 202–741–6030, or go
to: http://www.archives.gov/federal

_register/ code

_ of

_ federal

_regulations/ ibr

_ locations.html. Issued in Renton, Washington, on May 2,
2011. Kalene C. Yanamura, Acting Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2011–11333 Filed 5–12–11; 8:45 am]

**BILLING CODE 4910–13–P DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION** 

**Federal Aviation Administration**

**14 CFR Part 39**

**[Docket No. FAA–2011–0042; Directorate Identifier 2010–NM–267–AD; Amendment**  **39–16695; AD 2011–10–14]**

**RIN 2120–AA64**

**Airworthiness Directives; DASSAULT AVIATION Model MYSTERE–FALCON**  **50 Airplanes**

**AGENCY :**  Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department of Transportation (DOT).

**ACTION :**  Final rule.

**SUMMARY :**  We are superseding an existing airworthiness directive (AD) that applies to the products listed above. This AD results from mandatory continuing airworthiness information (MCAI) originated by an aviation authority of another country to identify and correct an unsafe condition on an aviation product. The MCAI describes the unsafe condition as:

On two occurrences on Myste ` re-Falcon 50 aeroplanes in service, it was detected that two pipes of the emergency brake system #2 located near the nose landing gear bearing were swapped.

The swapping of these two pipes implies that when the Left Hand (LH) brake pedal is depressed, the Right Hand (RH) brake unit is activated, and conversely, when the RH brake pedal is depressed, the LH brake unit is actuated. This constitutes an unsafe condition, which may go unnoticed as the condition is latent until the emergency brake system #2 is used. This condition, if not corrected, could ultimately lead to a runway excursion of the aeroplane.

* * * * * We are issuing this AD to require actions to correct the unsafe condition on these products.

**DATES :**  This AD becomes effective June 17, 2011.

The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by reference of a certain publication listed in this AD as of December 9, 2010 (75 FR 71530, November 24, 2010).

**ADDRESSES :**  You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at http:// www.regulations.gov or in person at the U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket Operations, M–30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC.

**FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT :**  Tom Rodriguez, Aerospace Engineer, International Branch, ANM–116, Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington 98057–3356; telephone (425) 227–1137; fax (425) 227–1149.

**SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION :** 

Discussion

We issued a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14 CFR part 39 to include an AD that would apply to the specified products. That NPRM was published in the Federal Register on February 16, 2011 (76 FR 8919), and proposed to supersede AD 2010–24–08, Amendment 39–16527 (75 FR 71530, November 24, 2010). That NPRM proposed to correct an unsafe condition for the specified products. The MCAI states:

In AD 2010–24–08, we pointed out that the corresponding EASA AD, AD 2010–0208–E, dated October 12, 2010, requires painting the pipes end of the emergency brake system number 2 and related unions within 7 months after the effective date of that AD. We explained that AD 2010–24–08 did not require that action, and that we might consider additional rulemaking to require this action in the future. We have determined that further rulemaking is indeed necessary to require that action, and this AD follows from that determination.

You may obtain further information by examining the MCAI in the AD docket.

Comments

We gave the public the opportunity to participate in developing this AD. We received no comments on the NPRM or on the determination of the cost to the public.

Conclusion

We reviewed the available data and determined that air safety and the public interest require adopting the AD as proposed.


### 27881 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 93 / Friday, May 13, 2011 / Rules and Regulations

Differences Between This AD and the MCAI or Service Information

We have reviewed the MCAI and related service information and, in general, agree with their substance. But we might have found it necessary to use different words from those in the MCAI to ensure the AD is clear for U.S. operators and is enforceable. In making these changes, we do not intend to differ substantively from the information provided in the MCAI and related service information.

We might also have required different actions in this AD from those in the MCAI in order to follow our FAA policies. Any such differences are highlighted in a NOTE within the AD. Costs of Compliance

Based on the service information, we estimate that this AD will affect about 248 products of U.S. registry.

The actions that are required by AD 2010–24–08 and retained in this AD take about 2 work-hours per product, at an average labor rate of $85 per work hour. Based on these figures, the estimated cost of the currently required actions is $170 per product.

We estimate that it will take about 1 work-hour per product to comply with the new basic requirements of this AD.The average labor rate is $85 per workhour. Based on these figures, we estimate the cost of the AD on U.S. operators to be $21,080, or $85 per product. Authority for This Rulemaking

Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA’s authority to issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the authority of the FAA Administrator. ‘‘ Subtitle VII: Aviation Programs, ′′ describes in more detail the scope of the Agency’s authority.

We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in ‘‘ Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General requirements. ′′ Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this rulemaking action. Regulatory Findings

We determined that this AD will not have federalism implications under Executive Order 13132. This AD will not have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship between the national government and the States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.

For the reasons discussed above, I certify this AD:

1. Is not a ‘‘ significant regulatory action ′′ under Executive Order 12866;

2. Is not a ‘‘ significant rule ′′ under the DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and

3. Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.

We prepared a regulatory evaluation of the estimated costs to comply with this AD and placed it in the AD docket. Examining the AD Docket

You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at http:// www.regulations.gov; or in person at the Docket Operations office between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD docket contains the NPRM, the regulatory evaluation, any comments received, and other information. The street address for the Docket Operations office (telephone (800) 647–5527) is in the **ADDRESSES** section. Comments will be available in the AD docket shortly after receipt. List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by reference, Safety. Adoption of the Amendment

Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the Administrator, the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as follows:

**PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES** 

■ 1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.

**§ 39.13 [Amended]**

■ 2. The FAA amends § 39.13 by removing Amendment 39–16527 (75 FR 71530, November 24, 2010) and adding the following new AD:

2011–10–14 Dassault Aviation: Amendment 39–16695. Docket No. FAA–2011–0042; Directorate Identifier 2010–NM–267–AD.

Effective Date

(a) This airworthiness directive (AD) becomes effective June 17, 2011.

Affected ADs

(b) This AD supersedes AD 2010–24–08, Amendment 39–16527. Applicability (c) This AD applies to DASSAULT AVIATION Model MYSTERE–FALCON 50 airplanes, certificated in any category, all serial numbers.
Subject

(d) Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 32: Landing Gear.

Reason

(e) The mandatory continuing airworthiness information (MCAI) states:

On two occurrences on Myste ` re-Falcon 50 aeroplanes in service, it was detected that two pipes of the emergency brake system #2 located near the nose landing gear bearing were swapped.

The swapping of these two pipes implies that when the Left Hand (LH) brake pedal is depressed, the Right Hand (RH) brake unit is activated, and conversely, when the RH brake pedal is depressed, the LH brake unit is actuated. This constitutes an unsafe condition, which may go unnoticed as the condition is latent until the emergency brake system #2 is used. This condition, if not corrected, could ultimately lead to a runway excursion of the aeroplane.
* * * * *
Compliance

(f) You are responsible for having the actions required by this AD performed within the compliance times specified, unless the actions have already been done.
Restatement of Requirements of AD 2010–
24–08

Actions

(g) Within 7 days after December 9, 2010 (the effective date of AD 2010–24–08), do a general visual inspection for correct installation (as defined in Dassault Service Bulletin F50–515, dated October 12, 2010) of the emergency brake system number 2, in accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions of Dassault Service Bulletin F50–515, dated October 12, 2010, except that work required by this AD can only be done by persons prescribed in 14 CFR 43.3 and
43.7.

(h) If the emergency brake system number 2 is found installed incorrectly during the inspection required by paragraph (g) of this AD: Before further flight, install the emergency brake system number 2 correctly, in accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions of Dassault Service Bulletin F50–515, dated October 12, 2010.
New Requirements of This AD

(i) Within 7 months after the effective date of this AD, paint the pipe ends of the emergency brake system #2 and related unions, in accordance with paragraph 2.C. of the Accomplishment Instructions of Dassault Service Bulletin F50–515, dated October 12,
2010.

FAA AD Differences

Note 1: This AD differs from the MCAI and/or service information as follows:

(1) European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) AD 2010–0208–E, dated October 12,


### 27882 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 93 / Friday, May 13, 2011 / Rules and Regulations

2010, has a compliance time of ‘‘ before the next flight after the effective date of this AD. ′′ This AD requires that the actions be done within 7 days after the effective date of AD
2010–24–08.

(2) EASA AD 2010–0208–E, dated October 12, 2010, allows the flightcrew to inspect the emergency brake system number 2 specified in accordance with Dassault Service Bulletin F50–515, dated October 12, 2010. However, this AD requires the inspection to be performed by certificated maintenance personnel.

Other FAA AD Provisions

(j) The following provisions also apply to this AD:

(1) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs): The Manager, International Branch, ANM–116, Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19, send your request to your principal inspector or local Flight Standards District Office, as appropriate. If sending information directly to the International Branch, send it to ATTN: Tom Rodriguez, Aerospace Engineer, International Branch, ANM–116, Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington 98057– 3356; telephone (425) 227–1137; fax (425) 227–1149. Before using any approved AMOC, notify your appropriate principal inspector, or lacking a principal inspector, the manager of the local flight standards district office/ certificate holding district office. The AMOC approval letter must specifically reference this AD.

(2) Airworthy Product: For any requirement in this AD to obtain corrective actions from a manufacturer or other source, use these actions if they are FAA-approved. Corrective actions are considered FAA-approved if they are approved by the State of Design Authority (or their delegated agent). You are required to assure the product is airworthy before it is returned to service.

Related Information

(k) Refer to MCAI EASA AD 2010–0208– E, dated October 12, 2010; and Dassault Service Bulletin F50–515, dated October 12, 2010; for related information.
Material Incorporated by Reference

(l) You must use Dassault Service Bulletin F50–515, dated October 12, 2010, to do the actions required by this AD, unless the AD specifies otherwise.

(1) The Director of the Federal Register previously approved the incorporation by reference of Dassault Service Bulletin F50– 515, dated October 12, 2010, on December 9, 2010 (75 FR 71530, November 24, 2010).

(2) For service information identified in this AD, contact Dassault Falcon Jet, P.O. Box 2000, South Hackensack, New Jersey 07606; telephone 201–440–6700; Internet http:// www.dassaultfalcon.com.

(3) You may review copies of the service information at the FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington. For information on the availability of this material at the FAA, call
425–227–1221. (4) You may also review copies of the service information that is incorporated by reference at the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA). For information on the availability of this material at NARA, call 202–741–6030, or go

to: http://www.archives.gov/federal

_register/ code

_ of

_ federal

_regulations/ ibr

_ locations.html.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on April 28,

2011. Kalene C. Yanamura, Acting Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2011–11329 Filed 5–12–11; 8:45 am]

**BILLING CODE 4910–13–P**

**CONSUMER PRODUCT SAFETY COMMISSION** 

**16 CFR Part 1217**

**RIN 3041–AC79**

**Safety Standard for Toddler Beds**

Correction

In rule document 2011–9421 beginning on page 22019 in the issue of Wednesday, April 20, 2011, make the following correction:

**§ 1217.2 [Corrected]**

On page 22029, in § 1217.2(c)(6), at the bottom of the page, insert §§ 1217.2(c)(6)(iii), 1217.2(c)(6)(iv), and 1217.2(c)(7), which should read:

(iii) 8.4.4 Toddler beds that convert from a full-size crib, also known as convertible cribs, must meet the warning requirements specified in section 8 of ASTM F 1169–10, instead of the requirements of 8.4.3. See 16 CFR Part 1219 for complete requirements for full-size cribs.

(iv) 8.4.5 Any toddler bed that can convert from a full-size crib, and has the warning specified in section 8.1.3 of ASTM F 1169–10, must include additional text at the end of that warning that specifies the minimum mattress thickness of 4 inches (100 mm). See 16 CFR Part 1219 for complete requirements for full-size cribs.

(7) In addition to figure 10 of ASTM F 1821–09, use the following:

[FR Doc. C1–2011–9421 Filed 5–12–11; 8:45 am]

**BILLING CODE 1505–01–D CONSUMER PRODUCT SAFETY**  **COMMISSION**

**[CPSC Docket No. CPSC–2010–0104**

**16 CFR Part 1512**

**RIN 3041–AC95**

**Requirements for Bicycles**

**AGENCY :**  Consumer Product Safety Commission.

**ACTION :**  Final rule.

**SUMMARY :**  The Consumer Product Safety Commission ( ‘‘ CPSC, ′′ ‘‘ Commission, ′′ or

‘‘ we ′′ ) is amending its bicycle regulations. The amendments make minor changes to the existing regulations to reflect new technologies, designs, and features in bicycles by clarifying that certain provisions or testing requirements do not apply to specific bicycles or bicycle parts. The amendments also clarify several ambiguous and confusing provisions. The final rule also corrects typographical errors and removes an outdated reference.

**DATES :**  The rule is effective June 13,
2011.

**FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT :**  Vincent J. Amodeo, Mechanical Engineer, Directorate for Engineering Sciences, U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission, 4330 East West Highway, Bethesda, MD 20814; e-mail vamodeo@cpsc.gov; telephone 301–504–
7570.

**SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION :**  I. Background

CPSC regulations, at 16 CFR part 1512, establish requirements for bicycles pursuant to the Federal Hazardous Substances Act. The regulations were first promulgated in 1978 (43 FR 60034 (Dec. 22, 1978)), with minor amendments in 1980 (45 FR 82627 (Dec. 16, 1980)), 1981 (46 FR 3204 (Jan. 14, 1981)), 1995 (60 FR 62990 (Dec. 8, 1995)), and 2003 (68 FR 7073 (Feb. 12, 2003)); 68 FR 52691 (Sept. 5, 2003)).

In recent years, there have been technological changes in bicycle design and in the materials used to manufacture bicycles that have caused some bicycle manufacturers to question the applicability of a particular CPSC regulation or to seek changes to the regulations. Additionally, the enactment of the Consumer Product Safety Improvement Act of 2008 (CPSIA), Public Law 110–314, 122 Stat. 3016, has resulted in new testing and certification requirements for children’s products. The Commission recognizes that there have been many changes in bicycle