alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
The State of



# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

Wednesday, January 28, 2015

N o. 04

- 12

- 00739

- CR

Jose Guadalupe MARTINEZ

, Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From th e 38th Judicial District Court, Real County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2010

- 1132

- DR

The Honorable Camile G. Dubose, Judge Presiding



### ORDER

Sitting: Catherine Stone, Chief Justice (not participating)

Karen Angelini, Justice

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

T he court issued its opinion in this appeal on October 29

, 2014. Appellant’s

motion for rehearing was therefore due November 13, 2014. The court granted appellant

three extensions of time to file a motion for rehearing. Our final order required any

motio n for rehearing be filed by January 16, 2015, and advised appellant that “[n]o

further extensions of time will be granted.” No motion for rehearing was timely filed.

However, on January 26, 2015, appellant filed a “Petition for Rehearing,” a “Motion for

Leave to File Petition for Rehearing Out

- of

- Time,” and a “Motion for Leave to File

Oversized Petition for Rehearing.”

We deny the motion for leave to file a late motion for rehearing. We deny the

motion for rehearing as untimely filed. We deny the mot ion for leave to exceed the word

limit for a motion for rehearing as moot.

_________________________________ Luz Elena D. Chapa, JusticeIN WI TNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 28th day of January, 2015

.

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Cou rt
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Treasury

###### Internal Revenue Service

# AGENCY:

Internal Revenue Service, Treasury.

# ACTION:

Notice of closed meeting of Art Advisory Panel.

# SUMMARY:

Closed meeting of the Art Advisory Panel will be held in Washington, DC.

# DATES:

The meeting will be held September 13, 2018.

# ADDRESSES:

The closed meeting of the Art Advisory Panel will be held at 999 North Capitol Street NE, Washington, DC 20003.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Maricarmen Cuello, AP:SEPR:AAS, 51 SW 1st Avenue, Room 1014, Miami, FL 33130. Telephone (305) 982-5364 (not a toll free number).

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Notice is hereby given pursuant to section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App., that a closed meeting of the Art Advisory Panel will be held at 999 North Capitol Street NE, Washington, DC 20003.

The agenda will consist of the review and evaluation of the acceptability of fair market value appraisals of works of art involved in Federal income, estate, or gift tax returns. This will involve the discussion of material in individual tax returns made confidential by the provisions of 26 U.S.C. 6103.

A determination as required by section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act has been made that this meeting is concerned with matters listed in sections 552b(c)(3), (4), (6), and (7), of the Government in the Sunshine Act, and that the meeting will not be open to the public.

Donna Hansberry,

Chief, Appeals.

[FR Doc. 2018-18381 Filed 8-23-18; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
<PAGE>

                                                                   Exhibit 24.2


                               POWER OF ATTORNEY

     KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that the person whose signature appears
below constitutes and appoints J. Michael Norris, Richard D. Haning and
Thomas P. Holden, and each of them, his true and lawful attorneys-in-fact and
agents, with full power of substitution and resubstitution, for him and in
his name, place and stead, in any and all capacities, to sign any or all
amendments (including post-effective amendments) to the Registration
Statement on Form S-1 (No. 333-40200) (and any registration statement filed
pursuant to Rule 462(b) under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, for the
offering which this Registration Statement relates), and to file the same,
with all exhibits thereto, and other documents in connection therewith, with
the Securities and Exchange Commission, granting unto said attorneys-in-fact
and agents, and each of them, full power and authority to do and perform each
and every act and thing requisite and necessary to be done in and about the
premises, as fully to all intents and purposes as he might or could do in
person, hereby ratifying and confirming all that said attorneys-in-fact and
agents or any of them, or their or his substitute or substitutes, may lawfully
do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.



                                            /s/ Phoebe A. Wood
                                            ---------------------
                                            Phoebe A. Wood
# C_2015253EN.01000301.xml

| 1.8.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 253/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.8.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 253/3

---

Notice for the attention of the data subjects to whom the restrictive measures provided for in Council Regulation (EU) No 753/2011, as implemented by Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/1322 concerning restrictive measures directed against directed against certain individuals, groups, undertakings and entities in view of the situation in Afghanistan applies

(2015/C 253/02)

The attention of data subjects is drawn to the following information in accordance with Article 12 of Regulation (EC) No 45/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council (1):

1

The legal basis for this processing operation is Council Regulation (EU) No 753/2011 (2), as implemented by Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/1322 (3).

2

3

The controller of this processing operation is the Council of the European Union represented by the Director-General of DG C (Foreign Affairs, Enlargement, Civil Protection) of the General Secretariat of the Council and the department entrusted with the processing operation is the Unit 1C of DG C that can be contacted at:

| Council of the European Union |
| --- |
| General Secretariat |
| DG C 1C |
| Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175 |
| 1048 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |
| E-mail: sanctions@consilium.europa.eu |

Council of the European Union

General Secretariat

DG C 1C

Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175

1048 Bruxelles/Brussel

BELGIQUE/BELGIË

E-mail: sanctions@consilium.europa.eu

The purpose of the processing operation is the establishment and updating of the list of persons subject to restrictive measures in accordance with Regulation EU) No 753/2011, as implemented by Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/1322.

The data subjects are the natural persons who fulfil listing criteria as laid down in that Regulation.

The personal data collected includes data necessary for the correct identification of the person concerned, the Statement of Reasons and any other data related thereto.

The personal data collected may be shared as necessary with the European External Action Service and the Commission.

Without prejudice to restrictions provided for in Article 20(1)(a) and (d) of Regulation (EC) No 45/2001, requests for access, as well as requests for rectification or objection will be answered in accordance with section 5 of Council Decision 2004/644/EC (4).

4

Personal data will be retained for 5 years from the moment the data subject has been removed from the list of persons subject to the asset freeze or the validity of the measure has expired, or for the duration of court proceedings in the event they had been started.

Data subjects may have recourse to the European Data Protection Supervisor in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 45/2001.

---

(1)  OJ L 8, 12.1.2001, p. 1.

1

(2)  OJ L 199, 2.8.2011, p. 1.

2

(3)  OJ L 206, 1.8.2015, p. 1.

3

(4)  OJ L 296, 21.9.2004, p. 16.

4

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                           1,581
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    2,457
<ALLOWANCES>                                       385
<INVENTORY>                                        813
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 4,926
<PP&E>                                         114,734
<DEPRECIATION>                                   7,943
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 131,561
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           26,844
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           144
<OTHER-SE>                                      58,333
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   131,561
<SALES>                                         61,154
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                61,154
<CGS>                                           43,517
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   43,517
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                10,526
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,206
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,554
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,014
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,540
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,540
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .12
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .12
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             NOV-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-30-1999
<CASH>                                          16,353
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    3,002
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     34,404
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                55,746
<PP&E>                                          44,592
<DEPRECIATION>                                  13,896
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  86,442
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           24,117
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            89
<OTHER-SE>                                      59,942
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    60,031
<SALES>                                        208,203
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               208,203
<CGS>                                          157,729
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  157,729
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    484
<INCOME-TAX>                                        97
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                387
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       387
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.04
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.04
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. {section} 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of China Golden Star Holdings Limited (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending December 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Jeremy Mork, Chief Executive and Financial  Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. {section} 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes- Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



|Dated:  February 14, 2011
By  /s/ Jeremy Mork
-----------------------------
    Jeremy Mork
    Chief Executive and  Financial Officer
   (Principal Executive and Financial Officer)
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING

MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

STEVEN WILLIAM FORESTER, )

)

Appellant, )

)

v. ) Case No. 2D18-1777

)

STATE OF FLORIDA, )

)

Appellee. )

)

Opinion filed September 11, 2019. 

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Lee

County; J. Frank Porter, Judge.

Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public Defender,

and Rachel Roebuck, Assistant

Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General,

Tallahassee, and Jeffrey H. Siegal,

Assistant Attorney General, Tampa,

for Appellee. 

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. 

VILLANTI, LaROSE, and ATKINSON, JJ., Concur.
I

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 3849

To amend section 3730 of title 31, United States Code, to limit the amount

a private party may be awarded in an action under such section.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

FEBRUARY 10, 1994

Mr. DUNCAN introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on the Judiciary

A BILL

To amend section 3730 of title 31, United States Code,

to limit the amount a private party may be awarded

in an action under such section.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. AWARD LIMIT.

4 Section 3730(d) of title 31, United States Code, is

5 amended—

6 (1) in paragraph (1), by inserting after ‘‘settle7 ment of the claim’’ the following: ‘‘or $1,000,000

8 whichever is less’’, and
2

•HR 3849 IH

1 (2) in paragraph (2), by inserting after ‘‘settle2 ment’’ the following: ‘‘or $1,000,000 whichever is

3 less’’.

Æ
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Discovery Oil, Ltd, (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ending December 31, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, M. Jeanett Ippolito, Secretary of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/ M. Jeanett Ippolito

By  ____________________________________

M. Jeanett Ippolito

Secretary

Date:  April 14, 2004
# C_2018035EN.01016201.xml

| 31.1.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 35/162 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

31.1.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 35/162

---

P8_TA(2016)0054

Accession of Croatia to the Convention on the protection of the financial interests of the Union *

European Parliament legislative resolution of 25 February 2016 on the recommendation for a Council decision concerning the accession of Croatia to the Convention of 26 July 1995, drawn up on the basis of Article K.3 of the Treaty on European Union, on the protection of the European Communities' financial interests, the Protocol of 27 September 1996, drawn up on the basis of Article K.3 of the Treaty on European Union, to the Convention on the protection of the European Communities' financial interests, the Protocol of 29 November 1996, drawn up on the basis of Article K.3 of the Treaty on European Union, on the interpretation, by way of preliminary rulings, by the Court of Justice of the European Communities of the Convention on the protection of the European Communities' financial interests and the Second Protocol of 19 June 1997, drawn up on the basis of Article K.3 of the Treaty on European Union, to the Convention on the protection of the European Communities' financial interests (COM(2015)0458 — C8-0296/2015 — 2015/0210(NLE))

(Consultation)

(2018/C 035/39)

The European Parliament,

The European Parliament

| — | having regard to the Commission recommendation to the Council (COM(2015)0458), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the Commission recommendation to the Council (COM(2015)0458),

| — | having regard to Article 3(4) and (5) of the Act of Accession of Croatia, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament (C8-0296/2015), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to Article 3(4) and (5) of the Act of Accession of Croatia, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament (C8-0296/2015),

| — | having regard to Rule 59 of its Rules of Procedure, |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to Rule 59 of its Rules of Procedure,

| — | having regard to the report of the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs (A8-0019/2016), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the report of the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs (A8-0019/2016),

| 1. | Approves the Commission recommendation; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Approves the Commission recommendation;

| 2. | Calls on the Council to notify Parliament if it intends to depart from the text approved by Parliament; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Calls on the Council to notify Parliament if it intends to depart from the text approved by Parliament;

| 3. | Asks the Council to consult Parliament again if it intends to substantially amend the text approved by Parliament; |
| --- | --- |

3.

Asks the Council to consult Parliament again if it intends to substantially amend the text approved by Parliament;

| 4. | Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council and the Commission. |
| --- | --- |

4.

Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council and the Commission.

---
<PAGE>



                                                       EXHIBIT 32.1
                                                       ------------

                          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                           18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                           AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with this Amendment No. 2 to the Annual Report of Applied
Digital Solutions, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K/A for the period ending
December 31, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Scott R. Silverman, Chief Executive
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

            (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

            (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
the Company.



/s/ Scott R. Silverman
----------------------
Scott R. Silverman
Chief Executive Officer
May 21, 2004


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Applied Digital Solutions, Inc. and will be retained by Applied
Digital Solutions, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

JAMESON CONAN BURN,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 6 MAL 2019

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 1st day of May, 2019

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED

.
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 16**  **- 2076** 

DENNIS RAY GRAVES , Petitioner

- Appellant ,
v. SUPREME COURT OF VIRGINIA , Respondent

- Appellee
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia , at Alexandria
. James C. Cacheris , Senior District Judge. ( 1:16

- cv - 01131

- JCC

- JFA )

Submitted : March 30 , 2017 Decided: April 3, 2017

Before TRAXLER and WYNN , Circuit Judges , and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge
.
Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion
. Dennis Ray Graves, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Dennis Ray Graves seeks to appeal the district court’s order construing his petition for a writ of mandamus as a 28
U.S.C. § 2254 (2012) petition and dismissing it as successive and unauthorized. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (A) (2012) . A certific ate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012)
. When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reaso nable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller

- El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336

- 38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the petition states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitut ional right. Slack , 529 U.S. at 484

- 85. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that
Graves has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability, deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis, and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately3 presented in the materials before th is court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT 23.2

         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

         The Board of Directors
         Zoom Telephonics, Inc.

         We consent to the use of our reports incorporated herein by reference
         and to the references to our firm in the registration statement.

         /s/ KPMG LLP

         Boston, Massachusetts
         October 2, 2000