alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
----

HOLIDAYS IN 2005

(2005/C 1/05)

COMMISSION

Brussels/Luxembourg

The above-mentioned dates also apply to LUXEMBOURG, except that Thursday 21st July is replaced by Thursday 23rd June, Luxembourg National Holiday.

The Commission reserves the right to modify the decisions, should the needs of service so require.

----
# Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

June 9, 2014

N o. 04

- 14

- 00120

- CV

IN THE INTEREST OF R.A.G.C., ET AL., CHILDREN,

From the 131st Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2011

- CI

- 00860

Honorable Martha B. Tanner, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

The Joint Motion to Expedite Ruling on Joint Motion to Abate Appeal Pending

Mediation and Suspend All Deadlines is hereby MOOT.

_________________________________ Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 9th day of June, 2014

.

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Denali Commission","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.denali.gov","author_name":"denaliadmin","author_url":"https:\/\/www.denali.gov\/author\/denaliadmin\/","title":"Denali Commission Partnering with U.S. Department of Justice","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"rwANrG9WwX\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.denali.gov\/denali-commission-partnering-with-u-s-department-of-justice\/\">Denali Commission Partnering with U.S. Department of Justice<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.denali.gov\/denali-commission-partnering-with-u-s-department-of-justice\/embed\/#?secret=rwANrG9WwX\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Denali Commission Partnering with U.S. Department of Justice” — Denali Commission\" data-secret=\"rwANrG9WwX\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.denali.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/04\/Mertarvik_Rendering2.png","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":345}
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS

Appeal of - )

)

Gulf Pacific Contracting, LLC ) ASBCA No. 62995

)

Under Contract No. N40085-16-D-8313 )

APPEARANCE FOR THE APPELLANT: Laurence J. Zielke, Esq.

 Zielke Law Firm, PLLC

 Louisville, KY

APPEARANCES FOR THE GOVERNMENT: Craig D. Jensen, Esq.

 Navy Chief Trial Attorney

Jerry Kim, Esq. 

 Trial Attorney

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

Appellant, Gulf Pacific Contracting, LLC, appealed from a July 15, 2021 

contracting officer's final decision. By letter dated September 2, 2021, that decision 

has been rescinded and the government requests dismissal without prejudice. In an 

October 1, 2021 email, appellant agreed with the government’s motion to dismiss. We 

dismiss the appeal as moot.

Dated: October 19, 2021

RICHARD SHACKLEFORD

Administrative Judge

Acting Chairman 

Armed Services Board

of Contract Appeals

I certify that the foregoing is a true copy of the Order of Dismissal of the 

Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals in ASBCA No. 62995, Appeal of Gulf 

Pacific Contracting, LLC, rendered in conformance with the Board’s Charter.

Dated: October 19, 2021 

PAULLA K. GATES-LEWIS

Recorder, Armed Services

Board of Contract Appeals
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v.

ANTONIO GONZALEZ, Jr.,

Defendant

- Appellant. No. 17

- 50016

D.C. No. 3:16

- cr

- 01835

- CAB

MEMORANDUM *

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of California

Cathy Ann Bencivengo, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted February 13, 2018 **

Before: LEAVY, FERNANDEZ, and MURGUIA, Circuit Judges.

Antonio Gonzalez, Jr., appeals his bench

- trial conviction for importation of

heroin, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 952, 960. We have jurisdiction under 28

U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

Gonzalez contends that the district court erred in concluding that he failed to

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The pa nel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 

# FILED

FEB 16 2018

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLER K

U.S. COURT OF APPEAL S2 17

- 50016

prove the elements of a duress defense. We review m ixed questions of law and

fact de novo. See United States v. Acosta

- Sierra, 690 F.3d 1111, 1117 (9th Cir.

2012).

T he district court did not err in concluding that Gonzalez had failed to

establish by a preponde rance of the evidence that he acted under duress. See

United States v. Solorzano

- Rivera , 368 F.3d 1073, 1081 (9th Cir. 2004). The court

was entitled to question Gonzalez’s credibility. See United States v. Archdale , 229

F.3d 861, 867 (9th Cir. 2000). M oreover, the record supports the court’s

conclusion that the threat alleged by Gonzalez was insufficient to support his

duress defense. See 9th Cir. Crim. Jury Instr. 6.5 (2010) (to establish duress,

defendant must prove that threat was “present, immediate, or impending”) ; United

States v. Chi Tong Kuok , 671 F.3d 931, 948 (9th Cir. 2012) ( a threat is

“immediate” only if it is specific; “vague and undetailed threats will no t suffice”).

AFFIRMED.
EXHIBIT 32



August 9, 2022



Via EDGAR



Securities and Exchange Commission

Judiciary Plaza

450 Fifth Street, N.W.

Washington, D.C. 20549



Re: Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



Ladies and Gentlemen:



In connection with the Quarterly Report of VOC
Energy Trust (the “Trust”) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2022 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, not in its individual capacity but solely as the
trustee of the Trust, certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that to its knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Trust.
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



The above certification is furnished solely pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350) and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure
document.



| | The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A.
| | -----------------------------------------------
| | Trustee for VOC Energy Trust                   
| |                                                
| | By:                                            
| |                                                
| |
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1


           CONSENT AND REPORT AS TO SCHEDULE OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS


We consent to the incorporation by reference in this Annual Report on Form 10-K
of MediaBin, Inc. of our report dated February 4, 2001, included in the 2000
Annual Report to Shareholders of MediaBin, Inc. and also included in this Annual
Report on Form 10-K.

Our audits also included the financial statement schedule of MediaBin, Inc.
listed in Item 14(a).  This schedule is the responsibility of MediaBin, Inc.'s
management.  Our responsibility is to express an opinion based on our audits.
In our opinion, as of the date of our report referred to in the preceding
paragraph, the financial statement schedule referred to above, when considered
in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly
in all material respects the information set forth therein.

We also consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement
(Form S-8 No. 333-68593) pertaining to the 1994 Amended and Restated Directors
Stock Option Plan and the 1994 Amended and Restated Stock Option Plan of
MediaBin, Inc. of our report dated February 4, 2001, and our report included in
the preceding paragraph with respect to the financial statement schedule
included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
2000.

                                      /s/ Ernst & Young LLP


Atlanta, Georgia
March 27, 2001
# C_2014042EN.01000101.xml

| 13.2.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 42/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.2.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 42/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.7129 — VREP/SUDKB/Duo Plast)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2014/C 42/01)

On 24 January 2014, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in German and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32014M7129. EUR-Lex is the online access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32014M7129. EUR-Lex is the online access to the European law.

---
Exhibit 32.3

CERTIFICATION OF PRESIDENT AND CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with Amendment No. 1 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of InfraREIT, Inc. for the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2018 (the “Report”), I, David A. Campbell, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of InfraREIT, Inc.

 

| Date: November 13, 2018 | /s/ David A. Campbell                 |
|-------------------------|---------------------------------------|
|                    | David A. Campbell                     |
|                    | President and Chief Executive Officer |
|                    | (Principal Executive Officer)         |

The foregoing certification is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (Exchange Act), and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of InfraREIT, Inc. under Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language of such filing.
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 170 (Friday, August 31, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Page 44640]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-18902]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute on Aging; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute on Aging Special Emphasis 
Panel; ``Drug Repositioning and Combination Therapy for AD''.
    Date: September 27, 2018.
    Time: 12:00 p.m. to 3:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institute on Aging, Gateway Building, Suite 
2C212, 7201 Wisconsin Ave., Bethesda, MD 20892 (Telephone Conference 
Call).
    Contact Person: Alexander Parsadanian, Ph.D., Scientific Review 
Officer, National Institute on Aging, Gateway Building 2C/212, 7201 
Wisconsin Avenue, Bethesda, MD 20892, 301-496-9666, 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#beeeffecedfffafff0f7fff0fffef0f7ff90f0f7f690f9f1e8"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="d2829380819396939c9b939c93929c9b93fc9c9b9afc959d84">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.866, Aging 
Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: August 27, 2018.
David D. Clary,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2018-18902 Filed 8-30-18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
**EXHIBIT 32**

 

November 8, 2018

 

Via EDGAR

 

Securities and Exchange Commission

Judiciary Plaza

450 Fifth Street, N.W.

Washington, D.C. 20549

 

Re: Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

 

Ladies and Gentlemen:

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of VOC Energy Trust (the “Trust”) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2018 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, not in its individual capacity but solely as the trustee of the Trust, certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to its knowledge:

 

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Trust.

 

The above certification is furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350) and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.

 
|     | The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company,   N.A. |
|----------|---------------------------------------------------|
|     | Trustee for VOC Energy Trust                      |
|     |                                              |   |
|     | By:                                               | /s/ MICHAEL J. ULRICH |
|     |                                              | Michael J. Ulrich |
| * * | * *                                          | *Vice President and Trust   Officer* |

 

----
----

Action brought on 11 October 2004 by the Federal Republic of Germany against the Commission of the European Communities

(Case T-414/04)

(2004/C 314/57)

Language of the case: German

An action against the Commission of the European Communities was brought before the Court of First Instance of the European Communities on 11 October 2004 by the Federal Republic of Germany, represented by C.-D. Quassowski and C. von Donat, lawyer.

The applicant claims that the Court should:

Pleas in law and main arguments:

By the contested decision, the Commission reduced the Community assistance from the ERDF Structural Funds for the Operational Programme RESIDER II North Rhine-Westphalia 1995-1999 (ERDF No 94.02.10.036 / ARINCO No 94.DE.16.051) to EUR 72 794 851.67 and refused to pay the German authorities the balance of EUR 2 268 988.33. The reason for the reduction is that, compared with the indicative financial plan, recourse to the programme was lower with respect to certain measures and higher with respect to others. A balance between the more and less heavily used measures was not achieved within the individual priorities of the programme but rather at the level of the programme as a whole.

In support of its action, the applicant first of all observes that, under Article 24 of Regulation No 4253/88, (1) Community assistance may be reduced only if there has been a significant change affecting the nature or conditions of the operation or measure. In the applicant's view, the adjustments made do not constitute such a significant change.

If those adjustments are to be regarded as a significant change, the applicant submits that the Commission gave prior approval in its ‘Guidelines on the closure of operational programmes (1994-1999) of the Structural Funds’ (SEC(1999) 1316).

The applicant also complains that the Commission abused its discretion by failing to even exercise it and that there are errors in the reasoning for the contested decision.

----

(1)  Council Regulation (EEC) No 4253/88 of 19 December 1988, laying down provisions for implementing Regulation (EEC) No 2052/88 as regards coordination of the activities of the different Structural Funds between themselves and with the operations of the European Investment Bank and the other existing financial instruments (OJ 1988 L 374, p. 1).

----
STEVEN L. BESHEAR 

GOVERNOR 

ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENT CABINET 

OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY 

Ms. Gwen Keyes Fleming 

Regional Administrator 

U.S. EPA, Region 4 

500 MERO STREET 

1 FH FLOOR. CAPITAL PLAZA TOWER 

FRANKFORT, KY 40601 

TElEPHONE: (502) 564-3350 

FACSl!\HLf.: (502) 564-7484 

hnp: 

January 31, 2013 

Sam Nunn Atlanta Federal Center 

61 Forsyth Street, SW 

Atlanta, GA 30303-8960 

Dear Ms. Fleming: 

LEONARD K. PETERS 

SECRETARY 

The Energy and Environment Cabinet hereby submits the following amended air quality 

regulations for inclusion into the Kentucky State Implementation Plan (SIP) pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 

7 41 0(1). These amendments became effective in Kentucky on December 7, 2012, and copies can be 

found at http://www.lrc.ky.gov/kar/TITLE40 1.HTM. The statutory authority for these regulations is 

provided in KRS 224.10-100(5). 

401 KAR 51:001. Definitions for 401 KAR Chapter 51. 

401 KAR 51:017. Prevention of significant deterioration of air quality. 

401 KAR 51:052. Review of new sources in or impacting upon nonattainment areas. 

Two copies of the amended administrative regulations are enclosed and electronic versions have 

been e-mailed directly to Scott Davis and Zuri Famgalo. The Cabinet appreciates your prompt response 

to this request. If you have any further questions or concerns regarding this submittal, please feel free to 

contact Laura Lund at (502) 564-3999, ext. 4428, or Laura.Lund@ky.gov. 

LKP/11 

Enclosures 

cc: Scott Davis 

Zuri Famgalo 

Kentucky U n bridledSpirit.com 

Sincerely:)f6qrs, 

/'·~<t~~- . ..... ·' /l/ ' :...re:. ~ 

Leonard K. Peters 

Secretary 

An Equal Opportunity Employer M/F /D
257 La. 989

#### Pierre Charles ARQUEMBOURG et al. v. Victor P. BOURQUE et al.

No. 51209.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

March 10, 1971.

In re: Pierre Charles Arquembourg and Zahra Arquembourg applying for certi-orari or writ of review to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, Parish of Ascension. 243 So.2d 92.

Writ denied. As to this applicant the result reached by the court of appeal is correct.
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3904 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 3904

To provide that certain service or management contracts will not result 
in municipal water or wastewater facilities being treated as used in a 
    private business use for purposes of the limitations on private 
                            activity bonds.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 24, 1994

Mr. Jefferson introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To provide that certain service or management contracts will not result 
in municipal water or wastewater facilities being treated as used in a 
    private business use for purposes of the limitations on private 
                            activity bonds.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. TREATMENT OF CERTAIN SERVICE OR MANAGEMENT CONTRACTS.

    (a) General Rule.--The provisions of services under a service or 
management contract shall not result in any municipal water or 
wastewater facility being treated as used in a private business use for 
purposes of section 141 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 if the 
requirements of section 5 of Revenue Procedure 93-19 are satisfied, 
except that, for purposes of this subsection, such Revenue Procedure 
shall be applied--
            (1) by substituting ``fifteen'' for ``five'' in section 
        5.03, and
            (2) as if it did not contain section 5.04.
    (b) Effective Date.--The provisions of subsection (a) shall take 
effect on the date of the enactment of this Act.

                                 <all>
```