alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
|   | (i)    | the annual report on Form 10-K of the Company, for the period  ended July 31, 2012, and to which this certification is attached as Exhibit 32 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and |
|--------|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                      |
|   | (ii)   | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.                                                                                                                                                      |

|   |   |                              |   |
|--------|--------|-----------------------------------|--------|
|   | By:    | /s/ Adam Radly                    |   |
|   |   |                              |   |
|   | Name:  | Adam Radly                        |   |
|   |   |                              |   |
|   | Title: | Chief Executive Officer and Chief |   |
|   |   | Financial Officer       |
|   |   |                              |   |
|   | Date:  | December 16, 2013                 |   |

----
f10q1213ex10iii_chinaginseng.htm


Exhibit 10.3


 


Labor Contract







This labor contract is based on the People’s Republic China’s labor law and labor contract law and other related laws and regulations.







Employer:   Jilin Huamei Beverage Co. Ltd.







Employer’s address: RM1612  Zhongji Building 1562 Jiefang Great Road, Changchun City, Jilin, China







Legal Representative: Liu, Changzhen







Employee: Ren, Ying







Gender: Female







Employee’s ID Number: 220102196006042225







Employee’s address:  Zhishan Rd,Nanguan district,Changchun city









I. Contract Period & Probation Period







Both parties agreed to choose   1   for the employment terms


 



	
  

	
1.

	
Fixed contract period: From January 2, 2014  to January 1,2017.








	
  

	
2.

	
No fixed contract period: From __________ year _______ month _______ day








	
  

	
3.

	
By Project : From _______________ to completion







 


II Job Description & Job Location







CFO







III Working Hours & Time Off







Both parties agreed to choose   1    as working hours


 



	
  

	
1.

	
Standard full time








	
  

	
2.

	
Non Standard hours








	
  

	
3.

	
Combined hours












IV Remuneration







By consensus, both parties confirm the wage is _¥3,000.00_ a month.  Payment should be in monetary form and full payment of the monthly wages shall be delivered by the _the last_ day of the month. Employer shall not unjustifiably deduct or delay in paying the wages. The monthly wage shall not less than the minimum wage implemented by the city.


 




  





  











  











V Social Insurance and Labor benefits


 


In accordance with central government, state, provincial and municipal policies and regulations







VI Labor conditions and labor protection against occupational hazards







In accordance with central government, state and provincial requirements relating to the implementation of occupational safety and health







VII Termination & Renew of the Labor Contract







Both parties observe the central government, state and provincial regulations regarding the termination of the labor contract.  Unless the violation is expressly stipulated by state, either party in violation of the contract will be subject to the payment of appropriate compensation for breach of contract.







This contract is effective from the date signed by both parties,


 


Employer: Jilin Huamei Beverage Co., Ltd.


 


Legal Representative: Liu, Changzhen       Date:   01-02-2014


 


Employee: Ren, Ying                                     Date:   01-02-2014


 


Governing Authority: Changchun City Employment Service (with seal)
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

March 15, 2023

No. 04-22-00823-CV

Eduardo Martinez ARIZALA,

Appellant

v.

Lourdes Lizeth Martinez ARIZALA,

Appellee

From the 73rd Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2022CI14443

Honorable Mary Lou Alvarez, Judge Presiding

ORDER

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, this appeal is DISMISSED FOR LACK 

OF JURISDICTION. It is ORDERED that costs be assessed against appellant.

SIGNED March 15, 2023.

_________________________________

Rebeca C. Martinez, Chief Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 15th day of March, 2023.

_____________________________

Michael A. Cruz, Clerk of Court
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information
extracted from the Registrant's audited financial
statements for the year ended December 31, 1997 and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to those financial
statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000924386
<NAME> RIDGEWOOD ELECTRIC POWER TRUST I
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                       1,042,568
<SECURITIES>                                 6,730,334<F1>
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,042,568
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               7,882,834
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          889,691<F2>
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   6,993,143<F3>
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 7,882,834
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,941,075
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               624,078
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,316,797
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,316,797
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,316,797
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   12,481
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   12,481

<FN>
<F1>Investments in power project partnerships.
<F2>Includes $214,563 due to affiliates.
<F3>Represents Investor Shares of beneficial interest
in Trust with capital accounts of $7,013,370 less
managing shareholder's accumulated deficit of $20,227.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.12

                                 PROMISSORY NOTE

FOR VALUE RECEIVED, the undersigned promises to pay to the order of eMissions
Testing, Inc. the sum of ninety four thousand eight hundred and eighty three and
35/100 dollars ($94,883.35) with annual interest of 12% on any unpaid balance.
Additionally a fee of two percent (2%) of the amount advanced shall be paid at
maturity.

This note shall be due and payable, together with all interest and fees due
thereon, on August 2, 2000. Should the note not be paid in full by the maturity
date the interest shall become eighteen percent (18%) from that date until paid
in full. Additionally, in event of default the holder of the note is entitled to
the collection of attorney fees and other costs in accordance with the laws of
the State of Georgia in the event that such services are needed in the
collection of this note.

The note may be prepaid, in full or in part, at any time prior to maturity
without penalty. All payments shall be first applied to interest and the balance
to principal.

Signed this 2nd day of June, 2000.

Signed in the present of


/s/ Karen Wiley Vickers                                Beachside Commons 1, LLC
------------------------------------
Witness

                                                   By: /s/ Gerald F. Sullivan
                                                      --------------------------
                                                       Gerald F. Sullivan,
                                                       Manager


                                      198
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of ETFS Asian Gold Trust (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2013 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, in the capacity and on the date indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and 

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

|                      |                                                           |   |
|---------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                      |                                                           |   |
| Date: August 8, 2013 | /s/ Christopher Foulds                                         | **     |
|                      | Christopher Foulds*                                            |   |
|                      | Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer                          |   |
|                      | (Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer) |   |

 

*          The Registrant is a trust and Mr. Foulds is signing in his capacity as an officer of ETF Securities USA LLC, the Sponsor of the Registrant. 

**         The original executed copy of this Certification will be maintained at the Sponsor’s offices and will be made available for inspection upon request.

----
----

|   | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company. |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:  June 29, 2011 |   | By:    |   /s/ Gamal Kulumbetov   |
|--------------------------------|--------|--------|-------------------------------|
|                           |   |   | Gamal Kulumbetov              |
|                           |   |   | Chief Executive Officer       |
|                           |   |   | (Principal Executive Officer) |

----
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 390 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 390

          To require random drug-testing of Federal employees.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 5, 1993

 Mr. Solomon introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
               Committee on Post Office and Civil Service

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
          To require random drug-testing of Federal employees.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled, That the President 
shall require random drug testing of officers and employees within the 
executive branch of the Government.

                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 32.1 – CEO Certification











CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUNT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In connection with the Quarterly Report of Liberated Enegy, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the three months ended March 31, 20132 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Frank Pringle, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.ss. 1350, as added by ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1.         The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.         The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the period covered by the Report.








/s/ Frank Pringle
 Name: Frank Pringle
 Title: Chief Executive Officer and
 (Principal Executive Officer)





May 15, 2013





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 ("Section 906"), or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Liberated Energy, Inc., and will be retained by Liberated Energy, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3770 Reported in Senate (RS)]

                                                       Calendar No. 493

103d CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H.R. 3770

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To designate the United States courthouse located at 940 Front Street 
  in San Diego, California, and the Federal building attached to the 
     courthouse as the ``Edward J. Schwartz Courthouse and Federal 
                              Building''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                June 23 (legislative day, June 7), 1994

                       Reported without amendment

                                                       Calendar No. 493
103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
                               H.R. 3770

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

               April 14 (legislative day, April 11), 1994

 Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and 
                              Public Works

                June 23 (legislative day, June 7), 1994

               Reported by Mr. Baucus, without amendment

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the United States courthouse located at 940 Front Street 
  in San Diego, California, and the Federal building attached to the 
     courthouse as the ``Edward J. Schwartz Courthouse and Federal 
                              Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The United States courthouse located at 940 Front Street in San 
Diego, California, and the Federal building attached to the courthouse 
shall be known and designated as the ``Edward J. Schwartz Courthouse 
and Federal Building''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the courthouse and Federal building 
referred to in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the 
``Edward J. Schwartz Courthouse and Federal Building''.

            Passed the House of Representatives April 13, 1994.

            Attest:

                                           DONNALD K. ANDERSON,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
1 Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 00-41169 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus OSCAR LUIS HINOJOSA, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. B-00-CR-27-1

-------------------- September 17, 2001 Before DUHÉ, EMILIO M. GARZA, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: 1 Through counsel, Oscar Luis Hinojosa has appealed his sentence for conspiracy and possession of marijuana with intent to distribute it. Hinojosa, who has been a fugitive since the selection of the petit jury, was tried and sentenced in absentia, pursuant to Fed. R. Crim. P. 43(b). The Government contends that Hinojosa’s appeal sh ould be dismissed pursuant to the “fugitive disentitlem ent doctrine.” Inexplicably, defense counsel did not reply to this argument.2

“[A] long escape, even if it ended before sentencing and appeal, may so delay the onset of appellate proceedings” that dismissal of the appeal would be appropriate. O rtega-Rodriguez v. United States , 507 U.S. 234, 249 (1993). Thus, “appellate courts may exercise [their discretion to dismiss fugitives’ appeals] by developing generally applicable rules,” which do not need to be uniform among the circuits. Id. at 250-51 nn.23 & 24. Dismissal of Hi nojosa’s appeal is appropriate under O rtegaRodriguez because Hinojosa has had a “long escape” which shows no signs of ending in the foreseeable future. As a result, dismissal of his appeal is supported by enforceability concerns, serves an important deterrent function, and advances “an interest in efficient, dignified appellate practice.” O rtega-Rodriguez , 507 U.S. at 242.
APPEAL DISMISSED.
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Energy Focus, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2013 (the “Report”), I, James Tu, Executive Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company and I, Frank Lamanna, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:



(i)   the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(ii)  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



| | /s/ James Tu                                            | 
| | ------------------------------------------------------- | 
| | James Tu
Executive Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
| | April 30, 2014                                         
| |                                                        





| | /s/ Frank Lamanna                     | 
| | ------------------------------------- | 
| | Frank Lamanna
Chief Financial Officer
| | April 30, 2014                       



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Energy Focus, Inc. and will be retained by Energy Focus, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

## FILED April 23, 2003 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-51005 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus ANTONIO HERNANDEZ-BALDERAS, also known as Martin Gallardo, also known as Antonio Hernandez, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. A-02-CR-128-1-SS

-------------------- Before DAVIS, BARKSDALE, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Antonio Hernandez-Balderas appeals the sentence imposed following his guilty plea conviction of being found in the United States after deportation/removal in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. He contends that the sentence is invalid because it exceeds the two-year maximum term of imprisonment prescribed in 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a). Hernandez-Balderas complains that his sentence was improperly enhanced pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b). He arguesNo. 02-51005 -2- that the sentencing provision is unconstitutional. Alternatively, Hernandez-Balderas contends that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a) and 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) define separate offenses. He argues that the prior conviction that resulted in his increased sentence was an element of a separate offense under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) that should have been alleged in his indictment.
In Almendarez-Torres v. United States , 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998), the Supreme Court held that the enhanced penalties in 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) are sentencing provisions, not elements of separate offenses. The Court further held that the sentencing provisions do not violate the Due Process Clause. Id. at 239-47. Hernandez-Balderas acknowledges that his arguments are foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres , but asserts that the decision has been cast into doubt by Apprendi v. New Jersey , 530 U.S. 466, 490 (2000). He seeks to preserve his arguments for further review. Apprendi did not overrule Almendarez-Torres

. See Apprendi , 530 U.S. at 489-90; United States v. Dabeit , 231 F.3d 979, 984 (5th Cir. 2000). This court must follow Almendarez-Torres “unless and until the Supreme Court itself determines to overrule it.” Dabeit , 231 F.3d at 984 (internal quotation marks and citation omitted). The judgment of the district court is
AFFIRMED. The Government has moved for a summary affirmance in lieu of filing an appellee’s brief. In its motion, the Government asks that an appellee’s brief not be required. The motion is GRANTED.
AFFIRMED; MOTION GRANTED.
#### Douglas McArthur TENNANT v. STATE.

No. 37072.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Feb. 1968.

Certiorari denied without opinion. 205 So.2d 324.