alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit








Schedule I (Stock Option Award with Relative TSR Vesting)
Performance Condition


Performance Period:  [     ]
Relative TSR Condition


TSR Measurement Period:  [    ]


Relative TSR Condition:  The Relative TSR Condition shall be satisfied if the Company’s Total Shareholder Return (as calculated below) during the TSR Measurement Period, as compared to the Total Shareholder Return of the other companies within the Peer Group, is [               ].  For the avoidance of doubt, if the Relative TSR Condition is not satisfied, then all outstanding Options shall be forfeited and immediately cancelled.


“Total Shareholder Return” means, with respect to any company, an amount (expressed as a percentage return) equal to:


(i) the sum of (x) the Ending Stock Price minus the Beginning Stock Price, plus (y) the amount of any dividends and distributions paid on a per share basis (calculated as if such dividends had been reinvested in the applicable company’s common stock on the applicable dividend date) cumulatively over the performance period,


divided by


(ii) the Beginning Stock Price.


“Beginning Stock Price” means, with respect to any company, the average closing price per share of common stock for the twenty (20) trading days immediately prior to the first trading day of the TSR Measurement Period.


“Ending Stock Price” means, with respect to any company, the average closing price per share of common stock for the twenty (20) trading days immediately prior to the last day of the TSR Measurement Period.


“Peer Group” means the following companies:


[                                ]




Any company in the Peer Group that ceases to be publicly held during the TSR Measurement Period (i) due to bankruptcy, liquidation or reorganization, shall remain in the Peer Group for purposes of calculation of the Relative TSR Condition (with such company deemed to have a Total Shareholder Return of -100% and ranked at the bottom of the Peer Group) or (ii)  due to a merger, sale, acquisition, business combination or other similar event, shall be excluded from the Peer Group for purposes of calculation of the Relative TSR Condition.
Order entered October 8, 2014

In The



## Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05

- 13

- 01567

- CR

CHARLES EUGENE PATTE RSON, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 265th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Tr ial Court Cause No. F

- 1031643

- R



### O RDER

The Court has before it the Appellant ’s October 1 , 2014 motion for extension of time to

file tendered reply brief. The Court GRANTS the motion. The Appellant’s reply brief received

by the Clerk of the Court on Octo ber 1 , 2014, is DEEMED FILED as of the date of this order.

/s/ DOUGLAS S. LANG

JUSTICE
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA
No. 18

- 0849 Filed January 9, 2020

STATE OF IOWA, Plaintiff

- Appellee,

vs. MAJOR CALVIN MOORE JR. , Defendant

- Appellant.

________________________________________________________________ Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Scott County, Thomas G. Reidel , Judge.

Major Moore Jr. appeals his sentence for criminal mischief in the third degree. AFFIRMED.

Thomas Hurd of Greenberg & Hurd, LLP , Des Moines , for appellant. Thomas J. Miller, Attorney General, and Timothy M. Hau , Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

Considered by Tabor, P.J. , Mullins, J., and Vogel, S.J. * *Senior judge assigned by order pursuant to Iowa Code section 602.9206 (20 20 ).2

VOGEL , Senior Judge

. Major Moore Jr. appeals his sentence for criminal mischief in the third degree. See Iowa Code § 716.5 (2017). On April 26, 2018, the district court entered its order sentencing him to a term of inc arcera tion not to exceed two years and imposed a fine, costs, and restitution. The court also revoked his probation in two other cases, imposed the terms of incarceration previously suspended, and ordered the term of incarceration here to run concurrently

. When a sentence is within the statutory limits, we review the sentence for an abuse of discretion. State v. Gordon , 921 N.W.2d 19, 24 (Iowa 2018). “We will find an abu se of discretion when ‘ the district court exercises its discretion on grounds or f or reasons that were clearly untenable or unreasonable. ’” Id. (quoting State v. Thompson , 856 N.W.2d 915, 918 (Iowa 2014)). Moore concedes his sentence is within the statutory limits. However, he argues the two

- year term of incarceration is an “untenabl e” sentence for “a misdemeanor property crime for breaking a phone .” During the sentencing hearing, the State recommended a two

- year sentence be imposed and that it run consecutively to the sentences to be imposed on the prior felony convictions. The court rejected the State’s recommendation , explain ing its reasoning for the sentence chosen : [M]y duty under the law is to review what’s available to me in terms of community resources, to determine what the appropriate rehabilitative plan for you would be , but to also consider the public must be protected. In doing so, I look at the seriousness of the crime, the effect that this crime has upon members of the community, your willingness to accept change and treatment, and what we have available within the community to assist you in this process.3 The court emphasized it “always look[s] first at the least restrictive alternatives before moving on to the more restrictive.” It reviewed Moore’s criminal history, including “some very serious offenses.” It n oted Moore failed to take full advantage of prior opportunities for rehabilitation

. It con cluded by finding “that to protect the community, to maximize your rehabilitation, and to deter this type of conduct, that incarceration is appropriate. ” On our rev iew of the record, we agree. We find no abuse of discretion and affirm his sentence.
AFFIRMED.
# C_2015339EN.01000101.xml

| 14.10.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 339/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.10.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 339/1

---

COMMUNICATION FROM THE COMMISSION

Automatic increase of an autonomous tariff quota under Council Regulation (EU) No 1220/2012

(2015/C 339/01)

Pursuant to Article 3 of Council Regulation (EU) No 1220/2012 (1), the volume of the following tariff quota is increased as follows for the 2015 calendar year:

1

| Order No | CN code | TARIC code | Description | Annual amount of quota
  (tons) | Quota duty | Quota period |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 09.2759 | ex 0302 51 10 | 20 | Cod (Gadus morhua, Gadus ogac, Gadus macrocephalus) and fish of the species Boreogadus saida, excluding livers and roes, fresh, chilled or frozen, for processing (2)
   (3) | 84 000 | 0 % | 1.1.2015-31.12.2015 |
| ex 0302 51 90 | 10 |
| ex 0302 59 10 | 10 |
| ex 0303 63 10 | 10 |
| ex 0303 63 30 | 10 |
| ex 0303 63 90 | 10 |
| ex 0303 69 10 | 10 |

Order No

CN code

TARIC code

Description

Annual amount of quota

(tons)

Quota duty

Quota period

09.2759

ex 0302 51 10

20

Cod (Gadus morhua, Gadus ogac, Gadus macrocephalus) and fish of the species Boreogadus saida, excluding livers and roes, fresh, chilled or frozen, for processing (2)
   (3)

Gadus morhua, Gadus ogac, Gadus macrocephalus

Boreogadus saida

2

3

84 000

0 %

1.1.2015-31.12.2015

ex 0302 51 90

10

ex 0302 59 10

10

ex 0303 63 10

10

ex 0303 63 30

10

ex 0303 63 90

10

ex 0303 69 10

10

---

(1)  OJ L 349, 19.12.2012, p. 4.

1

(2)  The quota is subject to the conditions laid down in the Articles 291 to 300 of Regulation (EEC) No 2454/93.

2

(3)  The quota is not available for products intended solely for one or more of the following operations:

3

| — | cleaning, gutting, tailing, heading, |
| --- | --- |

—

cleaning, gutting, tailing, heading,

| — | cutting (excluding dicing, filleting, production of flaps or cutting of frozen blocks or splitting of frozen interleaved fillet blocks), |
| --- | --- |

—

cutting (excluding dicing, filleting, production of flaps or cutting of frozen blocks or splitting of frozen interleaved fillet blocks),

| — | repacking of frozen IQF fillets, |
| --- | --- |

—

repacking of frozen IQF fillets,

| — | sampling, sorting, |
| --- | --- |

—

sampling, sorting,

| — | labelling, |
| --- | --- |

—

labelling,

| — | packing, |
| --- | --- |

—

packing,

| — | chilling, |
| --- | --- |

—

chilling,

| — | freezing, |
| --- | --- |

—

freezing,

| — | deep freezing, |
| --- | --- |

—

deep freezing,

| — | thawing, separation. |
| --- | --- |

—

thawing, separation.

The quota is not available for products intended to undergo treatment or operations which give quota entitlement, where such treatment or operations are carried out at retail or catering level. The quota is only available for products intended for human consumption.

---
Exhibit 10.17

 

Agreement for Land Use License

 

Shanghai Chengli Investment Consulting Firm(“Party A”)

Address: No. Room  A2551, No.1 Building, 2758  Song  Jin Gong Lu, Zhang Yan County, Jin

Shan District, Post Code: 201514, Shanghai, P. R. China.

Representative: HOU Xiaojing   Title: Legal Representative

 

The British International School, Shanghai (“Party B”)

Address: 600 Cambridge Forest New Town, 2729 Hunan Road, Zip code: 201315

Representative: Andrew Fitzmaurice  Title: Legal Representative

 

WHEREAS:

 

A.            The Parties entered into a lease agreement dated 25th February 2010 (the “Lease Agreement”) for the site currently used by the secondary school section of the British International School, Puxi (the “Secondary School Site”);

 

B.            The Secondary School Site was originally intended for a smaller school and does not offer adequate space for a sports field that holds a standard size football pitch and 5 tennis courts and a basketball. (Collectively the “Sports Field”);

 

C.            Party B has asked Party A to secure for its use a plot of land adjacent to the Secondary School Site (the “Adjacent Land”) for the Sports Field;

 

D.            Further to Party B’s request, Party A currently leases the Adjacent Land from the local government for Party B’s use and intends to participate in a bidding process, expected to 

 

1











 

take place in about three to four years, to allow it to convert the purpose of the Adjacent Land to suit Party B’s intended use (the “Bidding Process”);

 

E.             The Parties expect that the price of the Adjacent Land may be significantly increased by the time the bidding process takes place;

 

NOW THEREFORE, the Parties agree as follows:

 

1.              Party A hereby grants to Party B a license for the uninterrupted use of the Adjacent Land for [24] years, the remaining least term under the Lease Agreement, commencing 1st September 2012 (the “License”) and undertakes to submit the winning bid in the Bidding Process for the ownership rights for the Adjacent Land (the “Undertaking”).

 

2.              In consideration for the License, Party B shall pay to Party A a total amount of RMB Ten Million Yuan (RMB 10 million) in four equal installments of RMB Two Million Five Hundred Thousand Yuan (RMB 2.5 million), payable on the last business days in September and December in 2012, as well as on the last business days in March and June in 2013. Upon payment, Party A shall provide to Party B official invoice for the payment. All costs and taxes incurred in relation to such invoice shall be borne by Party A.

 

3.              The Parties’ rights and obligations under the License shall in principle be the same as those under the terms of the Lease Agreement.

 

4.              The Parties will enter into further discussions about Party A’s Undertaking and Party B’s obligation in relation to the Undertaking.

 

5.              This agreement shall take effect upon execution by the Parties.

 

2











 



 

3
Exhibit 10.02


 


TONIX PHARMACEUTICALS HOLDING CORP.


509 Madison Avenue, Suite 306


New York, New York 10022


 


February 11, 2014


 


VIA EMAIL


 


Lederman & Co., LLC


245 E. 93rd St. 14E


New York, NY 10022


Attn: Seth Lederman, Managing Member


 


Re:Termination of Consulting Agreement


 


Dear Mr. Lederman:


 


This letter shall serve
as an agreement to terminate the consulting agreement entered dated as of June 4, 2010 between Lederman & Co., LLC (“Lederman
& Co.”) and Tonix Pharmaceuticals, Inc., as amended on December 9, 2010, February 1, 2012 and October 15, 2013 (the “Agreement”).
Capitalized terms used but not defined herein shall have the meaning ascribed to them in the Agreement. Effective as of the close
of business on February 10, 2014, the Agreement shall be deemed terminated and February 10, 2014 shall be deemed the Termination
Date.


 


	 	TONIX PHARMACEUTICALS
    HOLDING CORP.
	 	 
	 	/s/
    LELAND GERSHELL
	 	By: Leland Gershell
	 	Title: Chief Financial
    Officer




  


Accepted to and agreed this


11th day of February, 2014:


  


LEDERMAN & CO., LLC


  


/s/ SETH LEDERMAN


By: Seth Lederman


Title: Managing Member
EXHIBIT 32





SOLO INTERNATIONAL, INC.





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. Section 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Solo International, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the six months ending March 31, 2015 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Michael Cooper Smith, as Principal Executive, Financial and Accounting Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date:  May 15, 2015
By:
/s/Michael Cooper SmithName:
Michael Cooper SmithTitle:
Principal Executive, Financial and Accounting Officer





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 1350 of Title 18 of the United States Code has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





The foregoing certification is being furnished as an exhibit to the Report pursuant to Item 601(b)(32) of Regulation S-K and Section 1350 of Title 18 of the United States Code and, accordingly, is not being filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission as part of the Report and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (whether made before or after the date of the Report, irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.)
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3984 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 3984

   To designate the United States post office located at 212 Coleman 
    Avenue in Waveland, Mississippi, as the ``John Longo, Jr. Post 
                               Office''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 9, 1994

  Mr. Taylor of Mississippi introduced the following bill; which was 
       referred to the Committee on Post Office and Civil Service

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To designate the United States post office located at 212 Coleman 
    Avenue in Waveland, Mississippi, as the ``John Longo, Jr. Post 
                               Office''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The United States post office located at 212 Coleman Avenue in 
Waveland, Mississippi, shall be known and designated as the ``John 
Longo, Jr. Post Office''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the post office referred to in section 1 
shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``John Longo, Jr. Post 
Office''.

                                 <all>
```
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3834 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 3834

To amend the independent counsel provisions of title 28, United States 
 Code, to authorize the appointment of an independent counsel when the 
 Attorney General determines that Department of Justice attorneys have 
                      engaged in certain conduct.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 9, 1994

Mr. Traficant introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the independent counsel provisions of title 28, United States 
 Code, to authorize the appointment of an independent counsel when the 
 Attorney General determines that Department of Justice attorneys have 
                      engaged in certain conduct.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ADDITIONAL AUTHORITY FOR APPOINTMENT OF INDEPENDENT COUNSEL.

    Section 592(c) of title 28, United States Code, is amended by 
striking ``or'' at the end of subparagraph (A), by striking the period 
at the end of subparagraph (B) and inserting ``; or'', and by adding 
after subparagraph (B) the following:
            ``(C) the Attorney General, upon completion of a 
        preliminary examination under this chapter, determines that 
        there are reasonable grounds to believe that--
                    ``(i) attorneys of the Department of Justice have 
                engaged in prosecutorial misconduct, corruption, or 
                fraud, and
                    ``(ii) further investigation is warranted.''.

                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF BIG FLOWER HOLDINGS, INC. AND
SUBSIDIARIES.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0001048662
<NAME> BIG FLOWER HOLDINGS
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                           5,307
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  152,454
<ALLOWANCES>                                    12,342
<INVENTORY>                                     46,510
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               216,381
<PP&E>                                         501,815
<DEPRECIATION>                                 134,939
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,059,047
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          233,849
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          115,000
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           195
<OTHER-SE>                                      71,343
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,059,047
<SALES>                                      1,376,706
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,376,706
<CGS>                                        1,072,296
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,072,296
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               272,669
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 1,371
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              41,996
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (11,626)
<INCOME-TAX>                                    21,945
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (33,571)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                               (13,463)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (47,034)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (2.51)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (2.51)
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                           4,198
<SECURITIES>                                 1,024,638
<RECEIVABLES>                                   17,024
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,536,864
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                        213,970
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         4,009
<OTHER-SE>                                     704,727
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,536,864
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                54,052
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                 (36,089)
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               (8,102)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    26
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             (3,825)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 22,214
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,866
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             20,348
<DISCONTINUED>                                     (0)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                    (0)
<CHANGES>                                          (0)
<NET-INCOME>                                    20,348
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.53
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.53


</TABLE>
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.3

                               CONSENT OF COUNSEL

    We consent to the reference to us under the heading "Experts" in this
Registration Statement on Form S-1.


/s/ RAEVENTNER LAW GROUP
Raeventner Law Group



September 15, 2000