alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Fourth Court of Appeals **San Antonio, Texas** MEMORANDUM OPINION No. 04

- 14

- 00677

- CV IN RE Gilbert GUEVARA Original Mandamus Proceeding PER CURIAM Sitting: Catherine Stone, Chief Justice Karen Angelini, Justice Marialyn Barnard, Justice Delivered and Filed: October 8, 2014 PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS DENIED Relator Gilbert Guevara filed a pro se petition for writ of mandamus on September 26 , 2014. Relator does not adequately identify a n underlying proceeding currently pending in any
court in this appellate district , the respondent judge, or the nature of the specific relief sought from this court

. See T EX . R. A PP . P . 52.3(d)( 1

- 3), (i). In addition, relator’s petition fails to satisfy several other requirements of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. See T EX . R. A PP . P . 52.3(a)

- (k). Mandamus will issue only to correct a clear abuse of discretion or the violation of a duty imp osed by law when there is no adequate remedy by appeal. Walker v. Packer , 827 S.W.2d 833, 839

- 40 (Tex. 1992) (orig. proceeding). The relator has the burden of providing this court with a record sufficient to establish a right to mandamus relief, including a copy of any order or other document showing the matter complained of. See T EX . R. A PP . P . 52.3(k)(1)(A), 52.7(a) (“Relator must file with the petition [ ] a certified or sworn copy of every document that is material to the04

- 14

- 00677

- CV
relator’s claim for relief and that was filed in any underlying proceeding”). Relator has not provided this court with a record sufficient to establish his claim for relief. Due to the deficiencies in relator’s petition and the lack of an adequate mandamus record, we are unable to deter mine whether the trial court has abused its discretion in any way. Accordingly, the petition for writ of mandamus is denied. See T EX . R. A PP . P . 52.8(a).

PER CURIAM

- 2

-
# C_2014385EN.01001501.xml

| 31.10.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 385/15 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

31.10.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 385/15

---

Notice from the Commission in accordance with Article 37 of Regulation (EC) No 562/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing a Community Code on the rules governing the movement of persons across borders (Schengen Borders Code)

(2014/C 385/06)

Pursuant to Article 37 of Regulation (EC) No 562/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 March 2006 establishing a Community Code on the rules governing the movement of persons across borders (Schengen Borders Code) (1) on 14 January 2014 Poland notified the European Commission of the following agreements concluded with Ukraine:

1

| 1. | Agreement of the Polish Government with the Government of Ukraine on cooperation during border checks of persons, goods and means of transportation crossing Polish-Ukrainian border signed in Kiev on 25 June 2001; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Agreement of the Polish Government with the Government of Ukraine on cooperation during border checks of persons, goods and means of transportation crossing Polish-Ukrainian border signed in Kiev on 25 June 2001;

| 2. | Agreement of the Polish Government with the Government of Ukraine from 25 November 2009 amending the agreement on cooperation during border checks of persons, goods and means of transportation crossing Polish-Ukrainian border signed in Kiev on 25 June 2001; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Agreement of the Polish Government with the Government of Ukraine from 25 November 2009 amending the agreement on cooperation during border checks of persons, goods and means of transportation crossing Polish-Ukrainian border signed in Kiev on 25 June 2001;

| 3. | Agreement of the Polish Government with the Government of Ukraine from 4 March 2004 on the appointment of border crossing points where border services of the agreeing parties can perform border checks on the territory of the other party. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Agreement of the Polish Government with the Government of Ukraine from 4 March 2004 on the appointment of border crossing points where border services of the agreeing parties can perform border checks on the territory of the other party.

The Polish and Ukrainian versions of these agreements can be found on the website of the European Commission, Directorate-General Home Affairs, under the following link:

http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/home-affairs/e-library/documents/policies/borders-and-visas/schengen/docs/listofnotificationsarticle37.pdf

---

(1)  OJ L 105, 13.4.2006, p. 1.

1

---
# C_2015376EN.01001201.xml

| 13.11.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 376/12 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.11.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 376/12

---

Notification of the Austrian Government pursuant to Article 10(2) of Directive 2009/72/EC of the European Parliament and the Council (‘Electricity Directive’) concerning common rules for the internal market in electricity regarding the designation of Austrian Power Grid (APG), Vorarlberger Übertragungsnetz GmbH (VÜN) and Eneco Valcanale S.r.l. as transmission system operators in Austria

(2015/C 376/07)

Following the Austrian regulatory authority's final decision of:

| 1. | 12 March 2012, PA 947/12 and 19 March 2012, PA 1021/12 regarding the certification of Austrian Power Grid (APG) as Independent transmission operator (ITO); |
| --- | --- |

1.

12 March 2012, PA 947/12 and 19 March 2012, PA 1021/12 regarding the certification of Austrian Power Grid (APG) as Independent transmission operator (ITO);

| 2. | 1 June 2012, PA 2284/12 regarding the certification of Vorarlberger Übertragungsnetz GmbH (VÜN) as Ownership Unbundled Transmission System Operator; |
| --- | --- |

2.

1 June 2012, PA 2284/12 regarding the certification of Vorarlberger Übertragungsnetz GmbH (VÜN) as Ownership Unbundled Transmission System Operator;

| 3. | 22 April 2015, PA 911/15 regarding the certification of Eneco Valcanale S.r.l. as Independent transmission operator (ITO); |
| --- | --- |

3.

22 April 2015, PA 911/15 regarding the certification of Eneco Valcanale S.r.l. as Independent transmission operator (ITO);

Austria has notified to the Commission the official approval and designation of these companies as a Transmission System Operator operating in Austria in accordance with Article 10 of the Electricity Directive of the European Parliament and the Council.

Any additional information can be obtained at the following address:

| Federal Ministry of Science, Research and Economy |
| --- |
| Department of Energy and Mining |
| Division Energy - Legal Affairs |
| E-mail: POST.III1@bmwfw.gv.at |
| Tel. +43 171100-3011 |
| Internet: www.bmwfw.gv.at |

Federal Ministry of Science, Research and Economy

Department of Energy and Mining

Division Energy - Legal Affairs

E-mail: POST.III1@bmwfw.gv.at

Tel. +43 171100-3011

Internet: www.bmwfw.gv.at

---
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 169 (Thursday, August 30, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Page 44262]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-18803]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

Bureau of Industry and Security


Regulations and Procedures Technical Advisory Committee; Notice 
of Partially Closed Meeting

    The Regulations and Procedures Technical Advisory Committee (RPTAC) 
will meet September 25, 2018, 9:00 a.m., Room 3884, in the Herbert C. 
Hoover Building, 14th Street between Constitution and Pennsylvania 
Avenues NW, Washington, DC. The Committee advises the Office of the 
Assistant Secretary for Export Administration on implementation of the 
Export Administration Regulations (EAR) and provides for continuing 
review to update the EAR as needed.

Agenda

Public Session

1. Opening remarks by the Chairman
2. Opening remarks by the Bureau of Industry and Security
3. Presentation of papers or comments by the Public
4. Export Enforcement update
5. Regulations update
6. Working group reports
7. Automated Export System update

Closed Session

8. Discussion of matters determined to be exempt from the provisions 
relating to public meetings found in 5 U.S.C. app. 2 Sec. Sec.  
10(a)(1) and 10(a)(3)

    The open session will be accessible via teleconference to 25 
participants on a first come, first serve basis. To join the 
conference, submit inquiries to Ms. Joanna Lewis at 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#0f45606e61616e21436a78667c4f6d667c216b606c21686079"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="8ec4e1efe0e0efa0c2ebf9e7fdceece7fda0eae1eda0e9e1f8">[email protected]</span></a> no later than September 18, 2018.
    A limited number of seats will be available for the public session. 
Reservations are not accepted. To the extent that time permits, members 
of the public may present oral statements to the Committee. The public 
may submit written statements at any time before or after the meeting. 
However, to facilitate the distribution of public presentation 
materials to the Committee members, the Committee suggests that 
presenters forward the public presentation materials prior to the 
meeting to Ms. Lewis via email.
    The Assistant Secretary for Administration, with the concurrence of 
the delegate of the General Counsel, formally determined on March 23, 
2018, pursuant to Section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 
as amended (5 U.S.C. app. 2 Sec.  10(d)), that the portion of the 
meeting dealing with pre-decisional changes to the Commerce Control 
List and the U.S. export control policies shall be exempt from the 
provisions relating to public meetings found in 5 U.S.C. app. 2 
Sec. Sec.  10(a)(1) and 10(a)(3). The remaining portions of the meeting 
will be open to the public. For more information, call Joanna Lewis at 
(202) 482-6440.

Joanna Lewis,
Committee Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. 2018-18803 Filed 8-29-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 3510-JT-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### Albert Charles RUBIANO, Appellant, v. Anne Blaz STEIN et al., Appellees.

No. 72-1363.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

July 3, 1973.

Rehearing Denied July 24, 1973.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
PROOF OF SUPPORT

The following items are what can be used for proof of support: 

*For USIP/ID and Travel initial and re-certifications we must have at least 3 months of proof. 

For BAH initial we must have at least 3 months of proof or back to when the member wants the 

BAH to start. For BAH recertification we must have from the last approval date on the last letter 

to current date.*

• Discretionary allotment to the claimed dependent.

• Cancelled checks (front and back) to the dependent from the member.

• Money order receipts showing the funds going to the dependent from the member. (For 

non-minor child cases the funds must go to the dependent unless there is a doctor’s note 

stating they are not able to leave to get the funds and the person that receives the funds 

for the dependent must provide a signed, dated, and notarized statement telling us they 

accept the funds on their behalf. If someone receives the funds for the dependent due to 

them being incapacitated then we will need to see their account information and a 

medical letter from the doctor stating why they cannot receive the funds themselves.)

• Western Union transfers made out to claimed dependent. (For non-minor child cases the 

funds must go to the dependent unless there is a doctor’s note stating they are not able to 

leave to get the funds and the person that receives the funds for the dependent must 

provide a signed, dated, and notarized statement telling us they accept the funds on their 

behalf. If someone receives the funds for the dependent due to them being incapacitated 

then we will need to see their account information and a medical letter from the doctor 

stating why they cannot receive the funds themselves.)

• Statement from the bank verifying fund transfers from member’s bank account to 

dependent’s bank account. We must see the names and account number on the member’s 

account and the dependent’s account. (For non-minor child cases the funds must go to the 

dependent unless there is a doctor’s note stating they are not able to leave to get the funds 

and the person that receives the funds for the dependent must provide a signed, dated, and 

notarized statement telling us they accept the funds on their behalf. If someone receives 

the funds for the dependent due to them being incapacitated then we will need to see their 

account information and a medical letter from the doctor stating why they cannot receive 

the funds themselves.)

• Copies of bills paid on behalf of the dependent may also be used along with proof of 

payment by the member. Copies of the member’s account statement for the account(s) 

that pays these bills showing the names on the account and the account number as well as 

copies of all of the bills the member pays is required.

• Funds transferred from the member’s account to the dependent’s account. The member 

can be joint on the dependent’s account but the dependent cannot be joint on the 

member’s account. Full bank statements showing all names on the accounts and the 

account number as well as all of the transactions for each month is required when this is 

the form of support used.
#### Commonwealth ex rel. Joyce, Appellant, *v.*Cleaver et ux.

Argued October 16, 1941.

Before Keller, P. J., Cunningham, Baldrige, Stadtfeld, Rhodes and Hirt, JJ.

*552November 12, 1941:

*Leo T. Connor,*with him *Richard T. McSorley,*for appellant.

*Josef Jaffe,*for appellees.

Pee Cueiam,

This appeal, by a father of a ten year old daughter, is from an order of the municipal court giving custody of the child to her aunt and uncle. The only testimony to support the charge that the father was not fit to have the custody of his daughter was given by the child’s maternal aunt, one of the respondents. The respondents offered to call other witnesses to testify relating to the father’s alleged mistreatment of his wife and children, but the court refused to hear them.

In a proceeding where the important question of the custody of a child is involved the pertinent facts should be fully, not partially, developed. Certainly more than one person should be called to testify especially when other witnesses were present in court waiting to be called, as in this case. The lower court referred to the petitioner being delinquent in complying with an order of support for the maintenance of the minor daughter, which may have influenced it in making the present order. That default is not determinative of the question whether the child’s best interest, which is the paramount issue, would be sub-served by putting her in the care and custody of the father or respondents: *Com. ex rel. Cummings et al. v. Nearhoof et ux.,*141 Pa. Superior Ct. 581, 15 A. 2d 529.

This court, in view of the meagerness of the testimony, is of the opinion that this record should be re*553mitted to the court below so that additional testimony-may be taken and an order then be made as the court below deems just and proper.

Order reversed and record remitted.
<PAGE>




Exhibit 99.1

         GOLF TRUST OF AMERICA, INC. ANNOUNCES CONCLUSION OF ANALYSIS OF
                             STRATEGIC ALTERNATIVES


CHARLESTON, SC, SEPTEMBER 28, 2000 -- Golf Trust of America, Inc. (AMEX:GTA),
today announced that its Board of Directors has elected to sell the Company or
execute an orderly disposition of the assets of the Company. The details of such
action will be developed in due course and submitted to the shareholders for
approval.

In February of 2000, the Company retained Banc of America Securities LLC as its
financial advisor to assist the Company's Board of Directors in a review of
strategic alternatives and to contact potential investors/acquirers. As a result
of information gathered in this process, the continuing review of the strategic
alternatives available and based upon the advice received from its financial
advisor, together with Company counsel and Company management, the Board of
Directors has concluded that it is in the best interests of the Company's
shareholders to either effect a sale of the Company or an orderly disposition of
its assets.

The Board has appointed a special committee of the independent Board members in
contemplation of a bid for the Company or any of the Company's assets from Larry
Young, a Company board member, the Company's largest unit holder, and the owner
of the Company's largest lessee(s).

Golf Trust of America, Inc. with headquarters in Charleston, South Carolina, is
a self-administered REIT originally formed to capitalize on the consolidation
opportunities in the ownership of golf courses in the United States. The Company
has acquired interests in 47 (18-hole equivalent) courses located in 17 states
(Alabama, California, Florida, Georgia, Illinois, Kansas, Kentucky, Michigan,
Missouri, Nebraska, New Mexico, North Carolina, Ohio, South Carolina, Texas,
Virginia and West Virginia).

                                       ###

THIS PRESS RELEASE CONTAINS FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS WITHIN THE MEANING OF
SECTION 27A OF THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933, AS AMENDED, AND SECTION 21E OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, AS AMENDED. THESE STATEMENTS INCLUDE ALL
STATEMENTS REGARDING THE COMPANY'S INTENTIONS AND STRATEGIES FOR PURSUING A SALE
OF THE COMPANY OR DISPOSITION OF ITS ASSETS. THE MATTERS DESCRIBED IN THESE
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS ARE SUBJECT TO MANY RISKS AND UNCERTAINTIES,
INCLUDING, FOR EXAMPLE, RISKS RELATED TO THE FLUCTUATING PRICE OF COMPANY STOCK
AND FLUCTUATING REAL ESTATE PRICES, AS WELL AS THE RISKS DESCRIBED IN THE
COMPANY'S FILINGS WITH THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION. THE COMPANY'S
ANTICIPATED ACTIONS, AS DESCRIBED IN THIS PRESS RELEASE, MAY NOT OCCUR AND THE
COMPANY'S, PUBLIC STOCK PRICE AND/OR ITS FINANCIAL POSITION AND RESULTS OF
OPERATIONS MAY SUFFER AS A RESULT.
<PAGE>

                                                                  EXHIBIT 99.1

NEON COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
NEON OPTICA, INC.

2200 West Park Drive   www.neoninc.com               800.891.5080 TEL
Suite 200                                            508.616.7800 TEL
Westborough, MA  01581                               508.616.7895 FAX

News Release                                         Contact:
Immediate                                            Fred Kocher
September 14, 2000                                   (508) 616-7819

                NEON ANNOUNCES CHANGE IN CORPORATE STRUCTURE AND
                     CONSUMMATION OF EXPANSION TRANSACTIONS

Westborough, Massachusetts - NorthEast Optic Network, Inc. (Nasdaq: NOPT)
announced today that it has completed the reorganization of its corporate
structure, as a result of which NEON Communications, Inc. became its parent
holding company and NorthEast Optic Network, Inc. changed its name to "NEON
Optica, Inc."

NEON also announced today that it has consummated its transactions with Exelon
Ventures Corp., a wholly owned subsidiary of PECO Energy Corp., and Consolidated
Edison Communications, Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of Consolidated Edison,
Inc., relating to NEON's expansion in the New York, Philadelphia, Baltimore and
Washington, D.C. markets.

NEON is a registered trademark of NEON Optica, Inc.

(Note: This news release may contain "forward looking statements" with the
meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, including but
not limited to, statements concerning future plans for expansion and completion
of the NEON -Registered Trademark- system. Such statements are subject to risks
and uncertainties which could cause actual results to differ materially from
those anticipated, including those risks detailed in the Company's filings with
the Securities and Exchange Commission, and should be read in light of these
risks. The Company assumes no obligation to update the information contained in
this news release.)
CLAUDIA ESTES, as personal representative of the ESTATE OF WILLIAM ESTES, JR., and CLAUDIA ESTES, individually

, Appellant s ,

v.

DOUGLAS ALLAN SWARTZ, M.D.; and INTEGRATED COMMUNITY ONCOLOGY NETWORK, LLC d/b/a McIver Urological Clinic

, Appellee s

. I N THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D 15

- 1770

_____________________________/

Opinion filed December 19, 2016.

An appeal fr om the Circuit Court for Duval County

. Tyrie W. Boyer , Judge

. Rebecca Bowen Creed of Creed & Gowdy, P.A., Jacksonville. Karen E. Terry and Matthew K. Schwencke of Searcy, Denney, Scarola, Barnhart & Shipley, P.A., West Palm Beach , for Appellant s

.

Michael R. D'Lugo and Richard E. Ramsey of Wicker, Smithy, O'Hara, McCoy & Ford, P.A., Orlando , for Appellee s

.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

LEWIS

, WETHERELL

, and RAY

, J J

. , CONCUR.
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 167 (Tuesday, August 28, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Page 43884]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-18547]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Mental Health; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended, notice is hereby given of a meeting of the Board of Scientific 
Counselors, National Institute of Mental Health.
    The meeting will be closed to the public as indicated below in 
accordance with the provisions set forth in section 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended for the review, discussion, and evaluation of 
individual intramural programs and projects conducted by the National 
Institute of Mental Health, including consideration of personnel 
qualifications and performance, and the competence of individual 
investigators, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly 
unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: Board of Scientific Counselors, National 
Institute of Mental Health.
    Date: September 24-26, 2018.
    Time: September 24, 2018, 1:40 p.m. to 6:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate personnel qualifications and 
performance, and competence of individual investigators.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, Porter Neuroscience 
Research Center, Building 35A Convent Drive, Bethesda, MD 20892.
    Time: September 25, 2018, 9:10 a.m. to 4:50 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate personnel qualifications and 
performance, and competence of individual investigators.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, Porter Neuroscience 
Research Center, Building 35A Convent Drive, Bethesda, MD 20892.
    Time: September 26, 2018, 8:05 a.m. to 12:15 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate personnel qualifications and 
performance, and competence of individual investigators.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, Porter Neuroscience 
Research Center, Building 35A Convent Drive, Bethesda, MD 20892.
    Contact Person: Jennifer E. Mehren, Ph.D., Scientific Advisor, 
Division of Intramural Research Programs, National Institute of 
Mental Health, NIH, 35A Convent Drive, Room GE 412, Bethesda, MD 
20892-3747, 301-496-3501, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#402d252832252e2a002d21292c6e2e29286e272f36"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="6c0109041e0902062c010d050042020504420b031a">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program No. 93.242, Mental 
Health Research Grants, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: August 22, 2018.
Melanie J. Pantoja,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2018-18547 Filed 8-27-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>