alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2015308EN.01000801.xml

| 18.9.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 308/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.9.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 308/8

---

Information communicated by Member States regarding closure of fisheries

(2015/C 308/13)

In accordance with Article 35(3) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1224/2009 of 20 November 2009 establishing a Community control system for ensuring compliance with the rules of the common fisheries policy (1), a decision has been taken to close the fishery as set down in the following table:

1

| Date and time of closure | 19.8.2015 |
| --- | --- |
| Duration | 19.8 – 31.12.2015 |
| Member State | Germany |
| Stock or Group of stocks | SAN/2A3A4., SAN/234_1, SAN/234_2, SAN/234_3, SAN/234_4, SAN/234_5, SAN/234_6 and SAN/234_7 |
| Species | Sandeel (Ammodytes spp.) |
| Zone | Union waters of IIa, IIIa and IV- Union waters of sandeel management areas 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 and 7 |
| Type(s) of fishing vessels | — |
| Reference number | 34/TQ104 |

Date and time of closure

19.8.2015

Duration

19.8 – 31.12.2015

Member State

Germany

Stock or Group of stocks

SAN/2A3A4., SAN/234_1, SAN/234_2, SAN/234_3, SAN/234_4, SAN/234_5, SAN/234_6 and SAN/234_7

Species

Sandeel (Ammodytes spp.)

Ammodytes spp.

Zone

Union waters of IIa, IIIa and IV- Union waters of sandeel management areas 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 and 7

Type(s) of fishing vessels

—

Reference number

34/TQ104

---

(1)  OJ L 343, 22.12.2009, p. 1.

1

---
United States Court of Appeals,

Fifth Circuit.

No. 92-1744.

Richard W. PICKENS, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants,

v.

LOCKHEED CORPORATION, et al., Defendants-Appellees.

May 21, 1993.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas.

Before KING, HIGGINBOTHAM and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

This case is the latest and last of a series of cases brought by Richard W. Pickens ("Pickens"),

Texas Extrusion Corp. ("TEC") or Pickens Industries, Inc. ("PII") seeking to set aside part or all of

the provisions of a joint plan of reorganization applicable to Picken s, TEC and PII whi ch was

confirmed by the Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of Texas in 1984 and affirmed by this

Court in Texas Extrusion Corp. v. Lockheed Corp., 844 F.2d 1142 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S.

926, 109 S.Ct. 311, 102 L.Ed.2d 330 (1988). The district court denied relief here on the basis, i nter

alia, that all the claims in the lawsuit were barred by the doctrine of res judicata and on the basis that

the lawsuit was not brought within six months of the entry of the order approving the joint plan of

reorganization as required by 11 U.S.C. § 1144. The district co urt was indisputably correct in

dismissing this case. All the claims asserted by Pickens, TEC and PII either could have been brought

in the many previous proceedings or they were brought and ultimately rejected.

Although we woul d be just ified in assessing sanctions against Pickens, TEC and PII as

Lockheed has requested, we have elected not to do so. Our decision, however, is without prejudice

to Lockheed's right to re-urge the imposition of sanctions should Pickens, TEC or PII attempt to act

in contravention of the order and judgment rendered herein.

We expressly forbid Pickens, TEC and PII, and each of them, from taking any action or filing

any pleadings concerning any matter or issue of any nature arising from or connected with thelitigation or causes of action heretofore asserted or existing between Pickens, TEC or PII, on the one

hand, and Lockheed Corporation or any of its affiliates, on the other hand. Without first obtaining

the express approval of a judge of t his Co urt, neither the Clerk of this Court, nor the clerk of any

district court or bankruptcy court within the Fifth Circuit shall accept for filing any pleading or other

document proffered by or on behalf of Pickens, TEC or PII as to any such matter or issue, including,

wit hout limitation, motions for rehearing or rehearing en banc in connection herewith, which we

expressly forbid them to file.

The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED and the mandate shall issue forthwith.
May 2 7 , 2015

U. S. Department of Transportation

Docket Management System

1200 New Jersey Ave., SE

Washington DC 20590

Re: Amendment to Exemption Application No. FAA

- 2015

- 0568

- 0001 filed

pursuant to Section 333 of the FAA Reform Act and Part 11 of the

Federal Aviation Regulations in Regulatory Docket No. FAA

- 2015

-

0568

.

Dear Sir or Madam;

DPR Construction has filed an application for Exemption numbered FAA

2015

- 0568

- 0001 (hereinafter t he Exemption) for the purpose of aerial imaging to

monitor and ensure safety of secured and controlled environmental construction

sites

. DPR hereby requests an amendment to the Exemption to allow an additional

model of unmanned aircraft systems (UAS) that fully complies with the conditions of

the Exemption.

DPR wishes to operate the Kespry UAS under the same terms and conditions

contained in the Exemption. Attached hereto, and submitted as a confidential

document, is the Flight Operations and Procedures Manual for the Kespry UAS. All

operations of the additional UAS will be in full compliance with the terms of the

Exemption.

Please contact the undersigned should you have any questions concerning

this request for an amendment to the Exemption.

S incerely yours,

Atul Khanzode

Director of Construction Technologies

DPR Construction

Gabriel Dobbs

Kespry, Inc.
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Denali Commission","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.denali.gov","author_name":"denaliadmin","author_url":"https:\/\/www.denali.gov\/author\/denaliadmin\/","title":"General Applicability Waiver of Build America, Buy America Provisions","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"5TBDpjblVo\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.denali.gov\/general-applicability-waiver-of-build-america-buy-america-provisions\/\">General Applicability Waiver of Build America, Buy America Provisions<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.denali.gov\/general-applicability-waiver-of-build-america-buy-america-provisions\/embed\/#?secret=5TBDpjblVo\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“General Applicability Waiver of Build America, Buy America Provisions” — Denali Commission\" data-secret=\"5TBDpjblVo\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.denali.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/02\/logo-1.png","thumbnail_width":189,"thumbnail_height":188}
Exhibit
      10.34




CONFIDENTIAL
      PORTIONS OF THIS DOCUMENT HAVE BEEN
      REDACTED AND FILED SEPARATELY


WITH
      THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
      COMMISSION





Commission
      Plan





Commercial
      Products Group


Bruce
      Gray


April
      2005-April 2006








The
      following Commission Plan will be based on all invoiced net sales generated
      by
      the Commercial Products Group within the designated quarters over the 12 month
      period beginning April 1, 2005.





Revenue
                Plan
            
            [***]Target
                Commission
            
            -
                $100,000








**Revenue**
            **Commission
                Rate**
            **Commission
                @ Plan****Quarter
                1**
            [***]
            [***]
            $25,000**Quarter
                2**
            [***]
            [***]
            $25,000**Quarter
                3**
            [***]
            [***]
            $25,000**Quarter
                4**
            [***]
            [***]
            $25,000**Total**
            [***]
            
            $100,000





There
      is
      no revenue contribution from any source other than that generated by the
      Commercial Products Group.





All
      quarterly revenue targets are based on invoiced sales, net of returns and
      accounting adjustments.





Commissions
      will be paid on the second pay period of the month following the end of the
      commission quarter.





Commission
      is based on a linear percentage, with no minimum, and no
      accelerator.





With
      the
      exception of Quarter 1, beginning 4/1/05, all quarterly revenue targets are
      irrespective of Engineering schedule slippage, or Manufacturing constraints.
      Quarter 1 "revenue" will be a based on all invoiced net sales plus GAP
      acceptable bookings which were released but left unshipped at the end of the
      Quarter.





Quarter
      1
      shall have a maximum commission cap of $25,000. Following Quarters will have
      no
      cap.





**Approved
      By:**


/s/
                  Kalani Jones
              
              5/5/05Kalani
                  Jones - President/COO
              
              Date/s/
                  Mike Russell
              
              10/14/05Mike
                  Russell - CFO
              
              Date
 
 1
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Conifer Holdings, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2015, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, James J. Petcoff, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

1.                                      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.                                      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

Date: September 14, 2015

 
| /s/James   J. Petcoff     |   |
|---------------------------|--------|
| James   J. Petcoff        |   |
| *Chief Executive Officer* |   |

 

1

----
#### Roessler et al., Appellants, *v.*The Security Savings & Loan Co., Appellee.

(No. 30712

Decided June 12, 1946.)

*Messrs. McFadyen <& Swisher,*for appellants.

*Messrs. M. E. & H. E. Johnson*and *Mr. John*T„ *Scott,*for appellee.

It is ordered and adjudged that this appeal as of right be, and the same hereby is, dismissed for the reason that no debatable constitutional question is involved.

*Appeal dismissed.*

Weygandt, .C. J., Zimimerman, Bell, Williams, Turner, Matthias and Hart, JJ., concur.
251 La. 1029

#### James Walter DICK v. Lynch PHILLIPS and Southeastern Fire Insurance Company.

No. 49115.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

March 26, 1968.

In re: James Walter Dick applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, Parish of Calcasieu. 205 So.2d 766.

It is ordered that the writ of review issue; that the Court of Appeal send up the record in duplicate of the case; and that counsel for plaintiff and defendant be notified.
#### MARTIN COUNTY, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, Appellant, v. Florence M. BARNES, Appellee.

No. 1501.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Fourth District.

Jan. 18, 1968.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 398 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 398

  To prohibit the importation of goods from any country that does not 
     adhere to certain standards with respect to the employment of 
   minorities, older individuals, and individuals with disabilities.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 5, 1993

 Mr. Solomon introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To prohibit the importation of goods from any country that does not 
     adhere to certain standards with respect to the employment of 
   minorities, older individuals, and individuals with disabilities.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PROHIBITION ON IMPORTATION OF GOODS FROM COUNTRIES THAT DO 
              NOT ADHERE TO CERTAIN EMPLOYMENT STANDARDS.

    (a) In General.--No goods may be entered into the customs territory 
of the United States from any country that is determined under 
subsection (b) to lack requirements for its businesses that are 
substantially similar to those imposed in the United States under the 
provisions of title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, the Age 
Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967, and the Americans With 
Disabilities Act of 1990.
    (b) Determination by U.S. Trade Representative.--Before the 
expiration of the 60-day period beginning on the date of the enactment 
of this Act, the United States Trade Representative shall determine, 
for each country from which goods are imported into the United States, 
whether such country has in effect the requirements described in 
subsection (a).

                                 <all>
```
irrovate . educate . impro i•.•

fcw the e!t tese h-aei nmotion onJtJst L'it rnyhzPg. v!s;t or Web site at w.iter'ri Rice Research Station

1373 Caffey Road Rayne, LA 70578 Phone: 337/788-7531 Fax: 337/788-7553
Mathy Stanislaus, Assistant Administrator Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response (OSWER) USEPA Headquarters Ariel Rios Building 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, N. W. Mail Code: 5101T Washington, DC 20460
Subject: SPCC Deadline

Dear Mr. Stanislaus:
The deadline should to be extended for Louisiana producers to comply with the SPCC requirements due to difficult issues beyond their control. These issues include:

1. The notification of the SPCC deadline to producers has not been adequately communicated in local news media, producer training, grower meetings and farm magazines. There is also a lack of knowledge, time, available resources and the professional expertise needed for compliance. For example, the Louisiana Master Farmer Program normally conducts much needed training classes and hosts Field Days, both being types of events where this information would be an important item on the agenda. These are very limited opportunities to communicate with producers. We normally have four (4) trainings per year and 18-24 field days but have had only one (1) with a SPCC presentation.

2. In Louisiana there are a very limited number of technical service providers and engineers available to provide the designs and plans. This serious issue will have to be addressed before producers can be expected to comply with SPCC regulations. Currently producers are harvesting their crops and have very limited, if any, time to devote to the regulation.

3. This year has been a very difficult one for producers because of the excessive rain fall in the spring delaying planting, followed by the drought during the growing season in some areas that ironically occurred concurrently with the flooding and threat of flooding in other areas of the state, and now coupled with the numerous rainfall events occurring during the harvest of most crops in Louisiana.
Due to the issues outlined above, we believe it is very prudent to extend the deadline to allow producers adequate time to respond to the SPCC requirements with the needed technical assistance in a responsible approach that results in full compliance with the regulation. Please don't hesitate to contact me if you have any questions.

Steve Linscombe Director, Rice Research Station LSU AgCenter Ernest Girouard Louisiana Master Farmer Project Coordinator LSU AgCenter
----

Legislative proposals adopted by the Commission

(2005/C 12/11)

These texts are available on EUR-Lex: http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/lex/

----
COMMISSIONERS 

P.J. STEVENS 

PRESIDENT 

MILAN GJURICH 

SALVATORE "SAM" VALENTY 

m^""^^.^"^ 

Do r-O^T- Q&o'2- /i ^ n 

ROBERTA. SHAHADE 

SOLICITOR 

MICHAEL GELLES, IV 

CHIEF CLERK/FINANCE DIRECTOR 

Office of County Commissioners 

200 South Center Street 

Ebensburg. PA 15931 

(814)472-5440 C~i 

April 23, 2010 

CO 

Dennis DeVany 

Chief, EAS and Domestic Analysis Division 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE 

Washington, DC 20590 

Re: Essential Air Service 

Dear Mr. DeVany: 

We, the Cambria County Board of Commissioners offer our support ofColgan Air continued 

service as Essential Air Service to the John Murtha Johnstown-Cambria County Airport (JST). We 

feel that Colgan 's offer to provide three round trips each weekday and weekend flights as well with 

both non-stop and one-stop service between Johnstown-Altoona-Washington Dulles would provide 

the most beneficial service to our county and region. 

We look forward to the continued growth and success of the John Murtha JohnstownCambria County Airport through a continuing and positive relationship with Colgan Air. 

Sincerely, 

Cambria County Board of Commissioners 

'.J. Stevens 

ident Commissioner 

Milan Gjurlch 

Commissioner 

S.J Valenty? 

Commissioner 

/hyg
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 95-60751 Conference Calendar

DONNIE MCDONALD, Petitioner-Appellant,

versus RAYMOND ROBERTS, Superintendent, Mississippi State Penitentiary; STEVE W. PUCKETT; MICHAEL C. MOORE, Attorney General of the State of Mississippi, Respondents-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Mississippi

USDC No. 1:95-CV-208-D-D

- - - - - - - - - - August 20, 1996 Before KING, DUHÉ, and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * The district court dismissed Donnie McDonald’s, #63622, petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 without prejudice for failure to exhaust state habeas remedies. At no time has McDonald asserted that he presented the issue of the trial court’s denial of his motion to suppress to the Mississippi state courts. ExhaustionNo. 95-60751 - 2 - of all claims in state court prior to requesting federal collateral relief is a fundamental prerequisite to federal habeas relief under § 2254. Sterling v. Scott , 57 F.3d 451, 453 (5th Cir. 1995), cert. denied , 116 S. Ct. 715 (1996).
AFFIRMED.
```

[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 153 (Friday, August 8, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 46402]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-18910]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

BROADCASTING BOARD OF GOVERNORS

Sunshine Act Meeting

DATE AND TIME: Wednesday, August 13, 2014, 9:00 a.m.-1:00 p.m. EDT.

PLACE: Cohen Building, Room 3321, 330 Independence Ave. SW., 
Washington, DC 20237.

SUBJECT: Notice of Meeting of the Broadcasting Board of Governors.

SUMMARY: The Broadcasting Board of Governors (Board) will be meeting at 
the time and location listed above. The Board will vote on a consent 
agenda consisting of the minutes of its June 20, 2014 meeting and a 
resolution to change the BBG meeting date in October 2014. The Board 
will discuss and vote on FY 2015 regional strategies based on this 
year's strategy review and consider establishing new Board special 
committees. The Board will also receive a report by its Special 
Committee on the Future of Shortwave Broadcasting. Finally, the Board 
will receive a presentation providing an overview of Radio Free Europe/
Radio Liberty and engage in a conversation with the Deputy National 
Security Adviser for Strategic Communication.
    This meeting will also be available for public observation via 
streamed webcast, both live and on-demand, on the agency's public Web 
site at www.bbg.gov. Information regarding this meeting, including any 
updates or adjustments to its starting time, can also be found on the 
agency's public Web site.
    The public may also attend this meeting in person at the address 
listed above as seating capacity permits. Members of the public seeking 
to attend the meeting in person must register at https://bbgboardmeetingaugust2014.eventbrite.com by 12:00 p.m. (EDT) on August 
12. For more information, please contact BBG Public Affairs at (202) 
203-4400 or by email at pubaff@bbg.gov.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Persons interested in obtaining 
more information should contact Oanh Tran at (202) 203-4545.

Oanh Tran,
Director of Board Operations.
[FR Doc. 2014-18910 Filed 8-6-14; 11:15 am]
BILLING CODE 8610-01-P
```