alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 12.2

                      SECURITY CAPITAL GROUP INCORPORATED
               COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO COMBINED FIXED
                     CHARGES AND PREFERRED SHARE DIVIDENDS

                         (DOLLAR AMOUNTS IN THOUSANDS)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                      Year Ended December 31,
                                         ---------------------------------------------------
                                           1999       1998        1997      1996     1995 (a)
                                         --------   --------   --------  --------   --------
<S>                                      <C>        <C>        <C>       <C>        <C>
Net Earnings (loss) from Operations      $(59,666)  $ 67,480   $ 38,241  $ (9,693)  $(21,274)
Add:
    Interest Expense                      133,454     82,203    104,434   117,224    103,804
                                         --------   --------   --------  --------   --------

Earnings as Adjusted                     $ 73,788   $149,683   $142,675  $107,531   $ 82,530
                                         ========   ========   ========  ========   ========

Combined Fixed Charges and
    Preferred Share Dividends:
    Interest Expense                     $133,454   $ 82,203   $104,434  $117,224   $103,804
    Capitalized Interest                    8,209     26,703     69,883    11,448      4,404
                                         --------   --------   --------  --------   --------

                                          141,663    108,906    174,317   128,672    108,208
    Preferred Share Dividends (b) (c)      20,280     22,368(d)  15,416    12,352         --
                                         --------   --------   --------  --------   --------

Combined Fixed Charges and
    Preferred Share Dividends            $161,943   $131,274   $189,733  $141,024   $108,208
                                         ========   ========   ========  ========   ========

Ratio of Earnings to Combined Fixed
    Charges and Preferred Share
    Dividends                                 0.5        1.1        0.8       0.8        0.8
                                         ========   ========   ========  ========   ========
</TABLE>

(a)  Excludes a one-time non-cash expense item ($158.4 million) incurred in
     acquiring the Financial Services Division from a related party.
(b)  The Preferred dividends are on a pretax basis.
(c)  Security Capital had no preferred dividends prior to 1996.
(d)  Excludes a one-time non-cash dividend of $19.8 million incurred in
     conjunction with the exchange of Series A Preferred Shares for Series B
     Preferred Shares.
EX-10.1



 Exhibit 10.1 

2013 Bonuses 
  

					
	 Executive Officer
	  	2013 Bonus Amount	 
	 David Hung, M.D.
	  	$	1,537,500	  
	 President and Chief Executive Officer
	  			
	 Cheryl Cohen
	  	$	541,100	  
	 Chief Commercial Officer
	  			
	 C. Patrick Machado
	  	$	590,900	  
	 Chief Business Officer and Chief Financial Officer
	  			
	 Lynn Seely, M.D.
	  	$	590,900	  
	 Chief Medical Officer
	  			

 2014 Base Salaries 
  

					
	 Executive Officer
	  	2014 Base Salary
(Effective January 1, 2014)	 
	 David Hung, M.D.
	  	$	787,500	  
	 President and Chief Executive Officer
	  			
	 Cheryl Cohen
	  	$	458,000	  
	 Chief Commercial Officer
	  			
	 C. Patrick Machado
	  	$	480,400	  
	 Chief Business Officer and Chief Financial Officer
	  			
	 Lynn Seely, M.D.
	  	$	500,000	  
	 Chief Medical Officer
### Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h

Elizabeth A. Weave r

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathaway,

J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk April 28, 2009

d0420 

# Order

April 28, 2009

138205

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 138205 COA: 284526 Wayne CC: 07-023459-FH ANTHONY LOMAX, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the applicati on for leave to appeal the December 12, 2008 order of the Court of Appeals is consider ed, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented shou ld now be reviewed by this Court.
EXHIBIT 23

<PAGE>
INDEPENDENT AUDITOR'S CONSENT



We consent to the  incorporation by reference in Registration  Statement No. 33-
93114 of FSF Financial Corp. on Form S-8 (filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission  on June 5, 1995) of our report  dated  October 24, 1997  included in
this Annual Report on Form 10-K of FSF Financial Corp. for the fiscal year ended
September 30, 1997.



/s/Bertram Cooper & Co., LLP
Bertram Cooper & Co., LLP
Waseca, Minnesota
December 16, 1997
RECEIVED IN FILED 1N

1716 Si*1?Disfri&ea'S The Court °* APPea'te

Sixth District

HAY 2B2015 SIXTH DISTRICT COURT nTM n * *nir _ OF APPEALS TM 2 fi 2015

iexarKana.Texas » •

TYRONg^S^r9&lS!S&N § Texarkana, Texas

Debra K. Autrey, Clerk

vs. § NO.06-14-0074-CR

THE STATE OF TEXAS §

MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE

RESPONSE TO STATES APPELLEE BRIEF

TO THE HONORABLE JUSTICE OF SAID COURT:

COMES NOW,Appellant,pro se,and respectfully moves the court

to extend the deadline for filing his response to the States

brief by (45) Fourty-five days and in support of this motion

will show this Honorable Court the following!

I.

This appellants (first) request for extension and appellant is

unable to meet the deadline for the following reasons:

[limited access to the law library due to the up-coming anually

unit lockdown and appellants limited knowledge thereby slowimg

down his ability to do research].See,T.R.A.P.38.6(d).

II.

For the reasons stated above, Appellant respectfully request

an additional (45) days to complete his pro se response in

support of appellants appeal.

WHEREFORE,PREMISES,CONSIDERED, Appwllant prays this Honorable

Court grants this motion and any other relief he is entitled

to. It is so prayed.

1.
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I certify that a true and correct copy of this motion has been

seat to,Noble D.Wal<er,Jr.,Hunt County District Attorney,at P.O.

Box 441,Greenville,Texas 75403-0441 by placing a copy of the

same in the U.S.mail postage prepaid on this.1.22nd day of May,2015

2.

Respectfully Requested,

Tyrone D.Anderson #1944026

Bill Clements Unit

9601 SPUR 591

Amarillo,Texas 79107
Note: This disposition is nonprecedential. 

## United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

05-3252

DAN C. BOECHLER, Petitioner,

v.

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR, Respondent.

David C. Thompson , David C. Thompson, P.C., of Grand Forks, North Dakota, argued for petitioner.

Brian T. Edmunds , Attorney, Commercial Litigati on Branch, Civil Division, United States Department of Justic e, of Washington, DC, argued for respondent. On the brief were Peter D. Keisler , Assistant Attorney General; David M. Cohen , Director; Donald E. Kinner , Assistant Director; and Claudia Burke , Attorney.

Appealed from: United States Merit Systems Protection BoardNOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. 

## United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

05-3252

DAN C. BOECHLER, Petitioner,

v. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR, Respondent.

__________________________ DECIDED: March 19, 2007

__________________________

Before NEWMAN, MAYER, and BRYSON, Circuit Judges

. PER CURIAM.

The court has reviewed the issues and ar guments, and concludes that the Board's

decision must be affirmed

. 1 Although the repeated critical statements to members of Congress and other high officials may on their face meet the criteria of the Whistleblower Protection Act, 5 U.S.C. ' 2302(b)(8)(A) (2000), as Mr. B oechler argues, there was

1 Boechler v. Dep't of the Interior , No. DE1221020389-W-3 (M.S.P.B. May 2, 2005).05-3252 2 evidence adequate to support the Board's fact ual finding that the proposed and rescinded 20-day suspension, the late seasonal start, and the selection of another candidate for the position for which Mr. Boechler applied, were not in retaliation for his protected disclosures. Further, we discern no denial of due proc ess in the erratic performance of the Board's audiovisual teleconferencing system, for it was not shown that evidence or argument on Mr. Boechler's behalf was thereby excluded. With respect to the evidence elicited from Thomas Lonnie, Mr. Boechler has pointed to nothing in the record to convince us that Mr. Lonnie's testimony was "inherently improbable or discredited by undisputed evidence." Gibson v. Dep't of Veterans Affairs , 160 F.3d 722, 726 (Fed. Cir. 1998). The existence of some inconsistencies in the evidence is not enough to overturn the administrative judge's credibility determination. Finally, contrary to Mr. Boechler's contention, we find no statutory or constitutional infirmity in the Board's system for reviewing the decis ions of its administrative judges.

No costs.
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

DONALD LYNN GOODWIN,

Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

Appellee.

§

§

§

§

§

No. 08-23-00092-CR 

Appeal from the

266th Judicial District Court

of Erath County, Texas

(TC#22CRDC-00005)

J U D G M E N T

The Court has considered this cause on the record and concludes there was no error in the 

judgment. We therefore affirm the judgment of the court below. This decision shall be certified 

below for observance.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 21ST DAY OF DECEMBER 2023.

GINA M. PALAFOX, Justice

Before Alley, C.J., Palafox, and Soto, JJ.
Exhibit 32.1
  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  In connection with the Quarterly Report of IZEA Holdings, Inc., a Nevada corporation (the “Company”), on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Edward Murphy, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
  (1)           The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
  (2)           The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
  Dated:  September 9, 2011
   /s/ Edward MurphyEdward Murphy

Chief Executive Officer

(Principal Executive Officer)
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-7217

JOHN RICKIE CRITE,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

STEVE COLE; MIKE EASLEY; WALTER BUNCH; JULIUS

A. ROUSSEAU, JR.; R. J. MCCURRY; JANICE H.

FAULKNER; NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE; WINSTON-SALEM POLICE DEPARTMENT; GUILFORD

COUNTY SHERIFF’S DEPARTMENT; GUILFORD COUNTY;

NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle

District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. William L. Osteen, Sr.,

District Judge. (CA-96-821-2)

Submitted: November 5, 1998 Decided: November 23, 1998

Before ERVIN, LUTTIG, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

John Rickie Crite, Appellant Pro Se. Debra C. Graves, Christopher

Edward Allen, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NORTH CAROLINA,

Raleigh, North Carolina; Susan D. Moore, COUNTY ATTORNEY’S OFFICE,

Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellees.
2

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

John Rickie Crite appeals the district court’s order denying

relief on his complaint filed under 42 U.S.C. §§ 1983, 1985 & 1986

(1994). We have reviewed the record and the district court's

opinion accepting the magistrate judge’s recommendation and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the

district court. Crite v. Cole, No. CA-96-821-2 (M.D.N.C. July 28,

1998). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
#### Nora CHATMON, Appellant, v. LUMBERMENS MUTUAL CASUALTY COMPANY, Appellee.

No. 72-243.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Nov. 14, 1972.

Michael J. Silverstein, Miami Beach, for appellant.

Wicker, Smith, Pyszka, Blomqvist & Davant, Miami, for appellee.

Before PEARSON, HENDRY and HAVERFIELD, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff-appellant, Nora Chatmon, seeks review of a final judgment for defendant, Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Company, which ordered that plaintiff was not entitled to insurance benefits arising out of an automobile accident in which she sustained injuries while a paying passenger in a jitney. Another paying passenger in the jitney, Albert Kennedy, was similarly injured during the same accident and he has already been before this court in a separate suit seeking relief, Kennedy v. Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Company, Fla.App. 1972, 264 So.2d 32. The Kennedy case which necessarily involves the exact same factual situation and questions of law has already been decided by this court and it is upon the authority established in Kennedy that we now reverse the lower court’s final judgment in the case hereunder consideration.

The judgment is reversed.
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)

In connection with this Report on Form 10-Q for the three and nine months ended June 30, 2012 (the Report) of
PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd. (the Registrant), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Arthur H. Penn, Chief Executive Officer of the Registrant, hereby certify, to the best of my
knowledge, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                  
|------------------
|/s/ Arthur H. Penn
|Arthur H. Penn    
|August 9, 2012
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1


                         Consent of Independent Auditors

We consent to the reference to our firm under the caption "Experts" in Amendment
No. 1 to the Registration Statement of ERP Operating Limited Partnership and
Equity Residential Properties Trust (Form S-4) and to the incorporation by
reference therein of our reports indicated below with respect to the financial
statements indicated below included in ERP Operating Limited Partnership's and
Equity Residential Properties Trust's filings as indicated below, filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission.

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                        Date of Auditors'
Financial Statements                                    Report                     Filing
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S>                                                     <C>                        <C>
Consolidated financial statements and schedule of       February 16, 2000,         Equity Residential
Equity Residential Properties Trust at December 31,     except for Note 23, as     Properties Trust's 1999
1999 and 1998 and for each of the three years in the    to which the date is       Annual Report on Form
period ended December 31, 1999                          March 3, 2000              10-K

Consolidated financial statements and schedule of ERP   February 16, 2000,         ERP Operating Limited
Operating Limited Partnership at December 31, 1999      except for Note 22, as     Partnership's 1999
and 1998 and for each of the three years in the         to which the date is       Annual Report on Form
period ended December 31, 1999                          March 20, 2000             10-K

Consolidated financial statements and schedules of      January 27, 1999           Equity Residential
Lexford Residential Trust at December 31, 1998 and                                 Properties Trust's
1997 and for each of the three years in the period                                 Current Report on Form
ended December 31, 1998                                                            8-K dated June 30, 1999

Consolidated financial statements and schedules of      January 27, 1999           ERP Operating Limited
Lexford Residential Trust at December 31, 1998 and                                 Partnership's Current
1997 and for each of the three years in the period                                 Report on Form 8-K dated
ended December 31, 1998                                                            June 30, 1999

                                                                                   /S/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP
</TABLE>

Chicago, Illinois
September 25, 2000
# C_2015029EN.01000302.xml

| 29.1.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 29/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.1.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 29/3

---

Information communicated by Member States regarding closure of fisheries

(2015/C 29/04)

In accordance with Article 35(3) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1224/2009 of 20 November 2009 establishing a Community control system for ensuring compliance with the rules of the common fisheries policy (1), a decision has been taken to close the fishery as set down in the following table:

1

| Date and time of closure | 22.12.2014 |
| --- | --- |
| Duration | 22.12.2014-31.12.2014 |
| Member State | Denmark |
| Stock or Group of stocks | HER/2A47DX |
| Species | Herring (Clupea harengus) |
| Zone | IV, VIId and Union waters of IIa |
| Type(s) of fishing vessels | — |
| Reference number | 89/TQ43 |

Date and time of closure

22.12.2014

Duration

22.12.2014-31.12.2014

Member State

Denmark

Stock or Group of stocks

HER/2A47DX

Species

Herring (Clupea harengus)

Clupea harengus

Zone

IV, VIId and Union waters of IIa

Type(s) of fishing vessels

—

Reference number

89/TQ43

---

(1)  OJ L 343, 22.12.2009, p. 1.

1

---
Exhibit 32   CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002   In connection with the Quarterly Report of China Complant Group Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended December 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned, Chief Executive Officer certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:  1. The report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.   Date:  February 20, 2011                  /s/ Jianxun Si ------------------------------- Jianxun Si, CEO
# C_2018035EN.01015601.xml

| 31.1.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 35/156 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

31.1.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 35/156

---

P8_TA(2016)0029

Eurojust and Montenegro Cooperation Agreement *

European Parliament legislative resolution of 2 February 2016 on the draft Council implementing decision approving the conclusion by Eurojust of the Agreement on Cooperation between Eurojust and Montenegro (11596/2015 — C8-0299/2015 — 2015/0812(CNS)

(Consultation)

(2018/C 035/33)

The European Parliament,

The European Parliament

| — | having regard to the Council draft (11596/2015), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the Council draft (11596/2015),

| — | having regard to Article 39(1) of the Treaty on European Union, as amended by the Treaty of Amsterdam, and Article 9 of Protocol No 36 on transitional provisions, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament (C8-0299/2015); |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to Article 39(1) of the Treaty on European Union, as amended by the Treaty of Amsterdam, and Article 9 of Protocol No 36 on transitional provisions, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament (C8-0299/2015);

| — | having regard to Council Decision 2002/187/JHA of 28 February 2002 setting up Eurojust with a view to reinforcing the fight against serious crime (1), in particular Article 26a(2) thereof, |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to Council Decision 2002/187/JHA of 28 February 2002 setting up Eurojust with a view to reinforcing the fight against serious crime (1), in particular Article 26a(2) thereof,

1

| — | having regard to Rule 59 of its Rules of Procedure, |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to Rule 59 of its Rules of Procedure,

| — | having regard to the report of the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs (A8-0008/2016), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the report of the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs (A8-0008/2016),

| 1. | Approves the Council draft; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Approves the Council draft;

| 2. | Calls on the Council to notify Parliament if it intends to depart from the text approved by Parliament; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Calls on the Council to notify Parliament if it intends to depart from the text approved by Parliament;

| 3. | Asks the Council to consult Parliament again if it intends to substantially amend the text approved by Parliament; |
| --- | --- |

3.

Asks the Council to consult Parliament again if it intends to substantially amend the text approved by Parliament;

| 4. | Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council, the Commission and Eurojust. |
| --- | --- |

4.

Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council, the Commission and Eurojust.

---

(1)  OJ L 63, 6.3.2002, p. 1.

1

---
Exhibit 32.01


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Crown Dynamics Corp. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2012 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Jeffrey Rassas, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:





(1)        The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)        The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.


















Dated: June 21, 2012                                                                            /s/ Jeffrey Rassas


By: Jeffrey Rassas


Its:  CEO





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.