alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 164 (Thursday, August 23, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Page 42647]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-18210]



[[Page 42647]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Department of the Navy


Notice of Intent To Grant Exclusive Patent License; Duchak 
Ventures, LLC

AGENCY: Department of the Navy, DoD.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Department of the Navy hereby gives notice of its intent 
to grant to Duchak Ventures, LLC, a revocable, nonassignable, exclusive 
license to practice in the field of use of respirator systems and 
safety applications; the field of use of filtering media within a 
respirator cartridge or respirator system and meant for human wear; and 
the field of use of air filter media for safety and hygiene 
applications in public, residential, industrial, and commercial 
facilities and structures, in the United States, the Government-owned 
invention described in U.S. Patent No. 7,749,438: Fluorophore Embedded/
Incorporating/Bridged Periodic Mesoporous Organosilicas as Recognition 
Elements for Optical Sensors, Navy Case No. 097,345.//U.S. Patent No. 
7,754,145: Fluorphore Embedded/Incorporating/Bridged Periodic 
Mesoporous Organosilicas as Recognition Photo-Decontamination 
Catalysts, Navy Case No. 097,346.//and any continuations, divisionals 
or re-issues thereof.

DATES: Anyone wishing to object to the grant of this license must file 
written objections along with supporting evidence, if any, not later 
than September 7, 2018.

ADDRESSES: Written objections are to be filed with the Naval Research 
Laboratory, Code 1004, 4555 Overlook Avenue SW, Washington, DC 20375-
5320.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Amanda Horansky McKinney, Head, 
Technology Transfer Office, NRL Code 1004, 4555 Overlook Avenue SW, 
Washington, DC 20375-5320, telephone 202-767-1644. Due to U.S. Postal 
delays, please fax 202-404-7920, email: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#166273757e626477785678647a387877606f387b7f7a"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="1e6a7b7d766a6c7f705e706c7230707f686730737772">[email protected]</span></a> or use 
courier delivery to expedite response.

    Authority: 35 U.S.C. 207, 37 CFR part 404.

    Dated: August 20, 2018.
James Edward Mosimann III,
Lieutenant, Judge Advocate General's Corps, U.S. Navy, Alternate 
Federal Register Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. 2018-18210 Filed 8-22-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 3810-FF-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
EXHIBIT 32.1

                           SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION

         In connection with the quarterly report of Rainbow Coral Corp. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended February 28, 2011 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Louis Foxwell, President
of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. SS. 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.

March 28, 2011                          /s/ Louis Foxwell
                                        -----------------
                                        Louis Foxwell, President, Principal
                                        Executive Officer, Principal Financial
                                        and Accounting officer


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
**Exhibit10.51**

**COMPENSATION AGREEMENT**

 

 

This Compensation Agreement, between Media Arts Group, Inc. (“MAGI”)and Anthony D. Thomopoulos (“Executive”), is made as of January 24, 2002.

 

WHEREAS, the Board of Directors requested that Executive serve asMAGI’s interim Chief Executive Officer;

 

WHEREAS, the Board of Directors approved that, for services as MAGI’sinterim Chief Executive Officer, MAGI shall pay to Executive $250,000 for thefirst three months of service (the “Cash Compensation”), and, if Executiveshall continue to serve as interim Chief Executive Officer thereafter, for eachmonth of service, up to three months, Executive shall be granted options topurchase 150,000 shares of common stock of MAGI, such options to be immediatelyexercisable and have an exercise price of $1.00 per share (the “Options”);

 

WHEREAS, Executive accepted the appointment as interim Chief ExecutiveOfficer and served in such capacity for seven (7) months;

 

WHEREAS, MAGI paid the Cash Compensation to Executive,

 

WHEREAS, upon mutual agreement of Executive and MAGI and MAGI’s Boardof Directors, MAGI did not grant or issue the Options to Executive;

 

WHEREAS, upon mutual Agreement of Executive and MAGI and MAGI’s Boardof Directors, in lieu of granting and issuing the Options to Executive, MAGIagreed to pay, and Executive agreed to accept, the payments set forth in thisCompensation Agreement.

 

NOW, THEREFORE, the Executive and MAGI hereby agree as follows:

 

1.                                       MAGI shall pay to Executive an aggregateof $400,000 in four equal $100,000 monthly payments, commencing on February 1,2002.

 

2.                                       Any purported grant or issuance of theOptions shall be null and void.

 

3.                                       This Agreement shall be governed by,construed and enforced in accordance with the internal laws of the State ofCalifornia without regard to principles of conflict of laws.

 

4.                                       This Agreement may not be extended,renewed, amended or modified other than by a written agreement executed byExecutive and MAGI, and approved by MAGI’s Board of Directors.

 

 

1

----

 

 

5.                                       This Agreement may be executed incounterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original, and all of whichtogether shall constitute one and the same original instrument.

 

ON WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement.

 

 

 
| MEDIA ARTS GROUP, INC.     |                      |   |
|----------------------------|---------------------------|--------|
|                       |                      |   |
| By:                        | /s/ Herbert D. Montgomery |   |
|                       | Herb Montgomery           |   |
|                       | Chief Financial Officer   |   |
|                       |                      |   |
| /s/ Anthony D. Thomopoulos |                      |   |
| Anthony D. Thomopoulos     |                      |   |
|                            |                           |        |  |  |  |

 

 

 

2

----
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-14-00284-CV

In re State Farm Lloyds, Kenneth Edward Anderson and Glenn Hart

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING FROM TRAVIS COUNTY

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

The petition for writ of mandamus is denied. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.8(a).

_____________________________________________

J. Woodfin Jones, Chief Justice

Before Chief Justice Jones, Justices Pemberton and Rose

Filed: June 19, 2014
EXHIBIT 32.1  SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION  In connection with the quarterly report of First Titan Corp. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q /A Amendment No. 1 for the period ended December 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Robert Federowicz, President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. SS. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.  December 6, 2012By:/s/ Robert FederowiczRobert FederowiczPresident, Principal Executive Officer,
Principal Financial and Accounting officer  A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3589 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3589

 To designate the lock and dam numbered 4 on the Red River Waterway in 
           Louisiana as the ``Russell B. Long Lock and Dam''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           November 20, 1993

  Mr. McCrery (for himself, Mr. Livingston, Mr. Tauzin, Mr. Baker of 
Louisiana, Mr. Hayes, and Mr. Jefferson) introduced the following bill; 
 which was referred to the Committee on Public Works and Transportation

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To designate the lock and dam numbered 4 on the Red River Waterway in 
           Louisiana as the ``Russell B. Long Lock and Dam''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The lock and dam numbered 4 on the Red River Waterway in Louisiana 
is designated as the ``Russell B. Long Lock and Dam''.

SEC. 2. LEGAL REFERENCES.

    Any reference in any law, regulation, document, record, map, or 
other paper of the United States to the lock and dam referred to in 
section 1 is deemed to be a reference to the ``Russell B. Long Lock and 
Dam''.

                                 <all>
```
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 378 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 378

To repeal and prohibit all privileges and gratuities for Members of the 
                United States House of Representatives.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 5, 1993

 Mr. Solomon introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                   Committee on House Administration

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To repeal and prohibit all privileges and gratuities for Members of the 
                United States House of Representatives.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled, That from the date of 
the enactment of this Act it shall be illegal to furnish, at the 
expense of the United States Government, any Member of the United 
States House of Representatives any of the following items free or at 
reduced costs: medicine, hospital care, ambulance services, meals, 
flowers, plants, pictures, picture frames, haircuts, or other items, 
services, or privileges, except official office expenses, such as 
office supplies.

                                 <all>
```
I

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 3893

To authorize the collection of entrance fees at Canaveral National Seashore,

and for other purposes.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

FEBRUARY 24, 1994

Mr. BACCHUS of Florida (for himself and Mr. MICA) introduced the following

bill; which was referred to the Committee on Natural Resources

A BILL

To authorize the collection of entrance fees at Canaveral

National Seashore, and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. ADMISSION FEES AT CANAVERAL NATIONAL

4 SEASHORE.

5 Section 4(a)(9) of the Land and Water Conservation

6 Fund Act of 1965 (16 U.S.C. 4601–6a(a)(9)) is amend7 ed—

8 (1) by striking out ‘‘, and Canaveral National

9 Seashore’’; and
2

•HR 3893 IH

1 (2) by inserting ‘‘and’’ before ‘‘San Juan Na2 tional Historic Site’’.

Æ
DYCK

- O’NEAL, INC., Appellant,

v.
RAUL MACEDA EGUI , Appellee

. IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED
CASE NO. 1D 1 7

- 0 920

___ __________________________/ Opinion filed October 16, 2017. An appeal from a n order of the Circuit Court for Duval County

. Kevin A. Blazs , Jud ge. David M. Snyder, David M. Snyder Professional Association, Tampa , Susan B. Morrison of the Law Offices of S usan B. Morrison, P.A., Tampa , and Joshua D. Moore of the Law Offices of Daniel C. Consuegra, Tampa , for Appellant

. Ryan G. Moore, First Coast Consumer Law, Jacksonville Beach , for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.
AFFIRMED. See Higgins v. Dyck

- O’Neal, Inc. , 201 So. 3d 157 (Fla. 1st DCA 2016) (holding that a party is not entitled to pursue a separate action for deficiency judgment where the foreclosure complaint includes a prayer for a2 deficiency judgment and the foreclosure court reserves jurisdiction to ent er a deficiency judgment); see also Dyck

- O’Neal, Inc. v. Lanham , 214 So. 3d 802 (Fla. 1st DCA 2017) (certifying conflict between this Court’s decision in Higgins and decisions by the other four district courts of appeal). ROBERTS, BILBREY, and KELSEY, J J

. , CONCUR.
# C_2015348EN.01000502.xml

| 21.10.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 348/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.10.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 348/5

---

Information communicated by Member States regarding closure of fisheries

(2015/C 348/09)

In accordance with Article 35(3) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1224/2009 of 20 November 2009 establishing a Community control system for ensuring compliance with the rules of the common fisheries policy (1), a decision has been taken to close the fishery as set down in the following table:

1

| Date and time of closure | 19.9.2015 |
| --- | --- |
| Duration | 19.9-31.12.2015 |
| Member State | Belgium |
| Stock or Group of stocks | PLE/8/3411 |
| Species | Plaice (Pleuronectes platessa) |
| Zone | VIII, IX and X; Union waters of CECAF 34.1.1 |
| Type(s) of fishing vessels | — |
| Reference number | 46/TQ104 |

Date and time of closure

19.9.2015

Duration

19.9-31.12.2015

Member State

Belgium

Stock or Group of stocks

PLE/8/3411

Species

Plaice (Pleuronectes platessa)

Pleuronectes platessa

Zone

VIII, IX and X; Union waters of CECAF 34.1.1

Type(s) of fishing vessels

—

Reference number

46/TQ104

---

(1)  OJ L 343, 22.12.2009, p. 1.

1

---
#### John DOE, a minor, by his mother and next friend, Jane DOE nfr Jane Doe, Plaintiff-Appellant, and Josephine Helelani Pauahi Rabago, Intervenor, v. KAMEHAMEHA SCHOOLS/BERNICE PAUAHI BISHOP ESTATE; Constance Lau, in her capacity as Trustee of the Kamehameha Schools/Bernice Pauahi Bishop Estate; Nainoa Thompson, in his capacity as Trustee of the Kamehameha Schools/Bernice Pauahi Bishop Estate; Diane J. Plotts, in her capacity as Trustee of the Kamehameha Schools/Bernice Pauahi Bishop Estate; Robert K.U. Kihune, in his capacity as Trustee of the Kamehameha Schools/Bernice Pauahi Bishop Estate; J. Douglas Ing, in his capacity as Trustee of the Kamehameha Schools/Bernice Pauahi Bishop Estate, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 04-15044.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Feb. 22, 2006.

John W. Goemans, Esq., Kamuela, HI, Eric Grant, Esq., Attorney at Law, Sacramento, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellant.

Emmett B. Lewis, Miller & Chevalier, Chartered Metropolitan Square, Washington, DC, David Schulmeister, Esq., Cades, Schutte, Fleming and Wright, Honolulu, HI, Kathleen M. Sullivan, Stanford Law School, Stanford, CA, Jay L. Carlson, Esq., Crystal K. Rose, Esq., Bays, Deaver, Hiatt, Lung & Rose, Honolulu, HI, for Defendants-Appellees.

Before MARY M. SCHROEDER, Chief Judge.

ORDER

Upon the vote of a majority of nonre-cused regular active judges of this court,1 it is ordered that this case be reheard by the en banc court pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion shall not be cited as precedent by or to this court or any district court of the Ninth Circuit, except to the extent adopted by the en banc court.

1

. Judge Clifton is recused.
#### Larry McCOY v. STATE of Mississippi.

Misc. No. 255.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

May 1, 1972.

Appellant filed petition in his own behalf.

A. F. Summer, Atty. Gen., by Timmie Hancock, Special Asst. Atty. Gen., Jackson, for appellee.

SMITH, Justice:

ON PETITION FOR RESENTENCING

Petitioner was convicted April 6, 1970, in the Circuit Court of Warren County on a charge of possession of marijuana. On April 16, 1971, the Uniform Controlled Substances Act became effective. Section 6831 through 6831-88 Mississippi Code 1942 Annotated (Supp.1971). Under that Act the possession of marijuana is also unlawful. There was a conflict as to the punishment to be imposed for the possession of marijuana as set forth in the Uniform Controlled Substances Act. In Johnson v. State, Miss., 260 So.2d 436, Decided March 27, 1972, this Court recognized the conflict and held that possession of marijuana is a misdemeanor.

Petitioner has requested this Court to resentence him under the authority of Johnson v. State, *supra.*Code section 6831-75(f), Mississippi Code 1942 Annotated (Supp.1971) states:

> Any person who was convicted and/or who is still serving a sentence in the Mississippi State Penitentiary for a first offense under any act hereunder repealed may, upon the enactment of this act, petition the court of original jurisdiction for resentencing under the provisions of this act.

See also Jackson v. State, Miss., 261 So.2d 126, Decided April 10, 1972.

The petitioner should address his petition to the trial court from which sentence was imposed. Under the authority of Johnson v. State, *supra,*the penalty for posession of marijuana is imprisonment for not more than six months or a fine of $500, or both.

*492Petition for resentencing dismissed without prejudice.

All Justices concur, except Sugg, J., who dissents.
## APPENDIX 5

References

### (This page intentionally left blank)Links to North Carolina General Statutes can be found on the following web page:

• http://www.ncleg.net/gascripts/statutes/Statutes.asp

Links to the North Carolina Administrative Code can be found on the following web page:

• http://daq.state.nc.us/rules/rules/

The North Carolina Analyzer Specifications can be found on the following web page:

• http://daq.state.nc.us/motor /inspect/analyzer_vendor.shtml

The newly revised and approved the DAQ Audit Proce dures were submitted to EPA on March 5, 2010.

Additional copies can be provided upon request.

The DMV manuals can be provided upon request.
#### FLORIDA BOARD OF REGENTS v. EDWARD W. FLEMING CONSTRUCTION CO.

No. 37040.

Supreme Court of Florida.

April 1968.

Certiorari denied without opinion. 204 So.2d 228.
Exhibit 10.1

 

2014 Executive Officer Annualized Base Salaries

 

The annualized base salaries for our executive officers for 2014 (effective July 1, 2014) are as follows:

 

	
Name
    	
 
    	
Title
    	
 
    	
2014
   Annualized
   Base Salary
    	
 
    
	
Randall A. Lipps
    	
 
    	
Chairman,   President and Chief Executive Officer
    	
 
    	
$
    	
600,000
    	
 
    
	
Robin G. Seim
    	
 
    	
Executive Vice President, Finance, Administration   and Manufacturing and Chief Financial Officer
    	
 
    	
$
    	
320,000
    	
 
    
	
J. Christopher Drew
    	
 
    	
Executive Vice President, Field Operations
    	
 
    	
$
    	
330,000
    	
 
    
	
Marga Ortigas-Wedekind
    	
 
    	
Executive Vice President, Global Marketing and   Product Development
    	
 
    	
$
    	
295,000
    	
 
    
	
Nhat Ngo
    	
 
    	
Executive Vice President, Strategy and Business   Development
    	
 
    	
$
    	
280,000
    	
 
    
	
Dan S. Johnston
    	
 
    	
Executive   Vice President and General Counsel
    	
 
    	
$
    	
275,000
    	
 
    
	
Jorge Taborga
    	
 
    	
Executive   Vice President, Engineering
    	
 
    	
$
    	
265,000
# Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida
Opinion filed June 19, 2024

. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________ No. 3D22

- 2044 Lower Tribunal No. 19

- 10774

________________ 

### Patricia Del Valle , Appellant,

vs. 

### SafePoint Insurance Company , Appellee.

An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami

- Dade County, Natalie Moore , Judge. Font & Nelson, PLLC, and Christopher Herrera and Jose P. Font (Fort Lauderdale) , for ap pellant. Bickford & Chidnese, LLP, and Patrick M. Chidnese and Frieda C. Lindroth (Tampa) , for appellee.

Before EMAS, MILLER and LOBREE , JJ. PER CURIAM.2 Affirmed. See Dade Cnty. Sch. Bd. v. Radio Station WQBA , 731 So. 2d 638 , 644 (Fla.1999) (stating that a claim not raised in the trial court will not be considered on appeal); Tillman v. State , 471 So. 2d 32, 35 (Fla.1985) ( “ In order to be preserved for further review by a higher court, an iss ue must be presented to the lower court and the specific legal argument or ground to be argued on appeal or review must be part of that presentation if it is to be considered preserved. ”); Dober v. Worrell , 401 So. 2d 1322 (Fla.1981) (holding that issues n ot presented to the trial judge will not be considered in an appeal from final judgment on the merits). See also Fla. R. App. P. 9.200(e) (“ T he burden to ensure that the record is prepared and transmitted in accordance with these rules shall be on the peti tioner or appellant.”) ; Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee , 377 So. 2d 1150, 1152 (Fla. 1979) (“Without a record of the trial proceedings, the appellate court can not properly resolve the underlying factual issues so as to conclude that the trial

co urt's judgment is not supported by the evidence or by an alternative theory. Without knowing the factual context, neither can an appellate court reasonably conclude that the trial judge so misconceived the law as to require reversal.”); Ponn v. Metro Expre ss, Inc. , 48 Fla. L. Weekly D1786 , 2023 WL 5731753, at *1 (Fla. 3d DCA Sept. 6, 2023) (“The choice to provide piecemeal transcripts deprived this Court of the ability to review the record3 as a whole. Absent a full transcript, this Court cannot determine wh ether the evidence presented by [appellant] at trial supported her argument that the proposed jury instruction should have been included or whether it was prejudicial for the trial court to fail to include that instruction.”)