alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)

In connection with this Report on Form 10-Q for the three months ended December 31, 2019, or the Report, of PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd., or the Registrant, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Aviv Efrat, Chief Financial Officer of the Registrant, hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge, that:

 

|        |     |                                                                                                                                        |
|--------|-----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and |

 

|        |     |                                                                                                                                                         |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant. |

 

|                                                       |
|-------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                  |
| /s/ Aviv Efrat                                        |
| Name:  Aviv Efrat                           |
| Title:    Chief Financial Officer |
| Date:    February 5, 2020         |
Exhibit 32.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with this Quarterly Report of WTTJ Corp, on Form 10-Q for the Quarter ending June 30, 2012 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Peter Klamka, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify to the best of my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (1) Such Annual Report on Form 10-Q for the six months ending June 30 2012, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and June 30, 2012 fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of WTTJ Corp.  August 10, 2012By:/s/ Peter KlamkaPeter KlamkaChairman, President and Chief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer)
** **

**EXHIBIT 32.2.**

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

I, John Christopher Krabiel, certify that:

 

1. the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2011 (the “Report”), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

2. the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Herbst Gaming, LLC at the dates and for the periods indicated.

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Herbst Gaming, LLC and will be retained by Herbst Gaming, LLC and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

The undersigned expressly disclaims any obligation to update the foregoing certification except as required by law.

 

Date: May 13, 2011

 
|   | /s/ John Christopher Krabiel                                         |
|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   | John Christopher Krabiel    Chief Financial Officer and    Treasurer |
|   |                                                                 |
|   | Dated: May 13, 2011                                             |

 

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to the requirements of 18 U.S.C. § 1350 and is not being filed as a part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.

 

----
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3260 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3260

 To require the Comptroller General of the United States to conduct a 
  study regarding the ability of Mexico to carry out its obligations 
      under the North American Free Trade Agreement and the NAFTA 
                        Supplemental Agreements.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 12, 1993

Mr. Traficant introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To require the Comptroller General of the United States to conduct a 
  study regarding the ability of Mexico to carry out its obligations 
      under the North American Free Trade Agreement and the NAFTA 
                        Supplemental Agreements.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. STUDY.

    The Comptroller General of the United States shall undertake a 
study regarding the ability, on both a short-term and a long-term 
basis, of the Government of Mexico to carry out its obligations under 
the North American Free Trade Agreement and the NAFTA Supplemental 
Agreements. The study shall specifically address the effect of the 
Government of Mexico's performance in carrying out such obligations on 
manufacturing and employment in the United States, as well as the 
ability of that Government to enforce its environmental or other 
regulatory obligations under such Agreements.

SEC. 2. SUBMISSION OF REPORT TO CONGRESS.

    Within 1 year after the date of the enactment of this Act, the 
Comptroller General of the United States shall--
            (1) complete the study required under section 1; and
            (2) submit to the Congress a report containing the results 
        of the study.

                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 32


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, the
undersigned officer of the Pinewood Acquisition Corporation
(the "Company"), hereby certify to my knowledge that:

The Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30,
2010 of the Company fully complies, in all material respects,
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained in the
Report fairly represents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by
the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.


                             /s/ James M. Cassidy
                                 President, Director,
                                 Chief Executivie Officer,
                                 Chief Financial Officer and
                                 Principal Accounting Officer
Date: January 25, 2011
# C_2014062EN.01000201.xml

| 4.3.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 62/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.3.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 62/2

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.7052 — Lloyds Development Capital/PostNL/TNT Post UK)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2014/C 62/02

On 30 January 2014, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32014M7052. EUR-Lex is the online access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32014M7052. EUR-Lex is the online access to the European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
I

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 4060

To amend title 18, United States Code, to require the imposition of the

death penalty for espionage that resulted in the identification by a

foreign power of an individual acting as an agent of the United States

and consequently in the death of that individual.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 16, 1994

Mr. DORNAN (for himself, Mr. STUMP, Mr. BARTLETT of Maryland, Mr.

FIELDS of Texas, Mr. KING, Mr. MCHUGH, Mr. LEWIS of Florida, Mr.

GEKAS, Mr. STEARNS, Mr. HYDE, and Mr. LEVY) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

A BILL

To amend title 18, United States Code, to require the imposition of the death penalty for espionage that resulted

in the identification by a foreign power of an individual

acting as an agent of the United States and consequently

in the death of that individual.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. ESPIONAGE.

4 Section 794 of title 18, United States Code, is

5 amended by adding at the end the following:
2

•HR 4060 IH

1 ‘‘(e) Any person convicted of a violation of this sec2 tion that resulted in the identification by a foreign power

3 (as defined in section 101(a) of the Foreign Intelligence

4 Surveillance Act of 1978) of an individual acting as an

5 agent of the United States and consequently in the death

6 of that individual, shall be punished by death.’’.

Æ
T&E.a1e.baselines.and.benefits.Mon.Mar.21.2011.xls

Author: Abt Associates Inc.

Created: 03/21/11

Worksheet Description

T&E_Losses

Output of the T&E model showing species-specific reductions in I&E

mortality of T&E species under regulatory options 1 through 4

Purpose: Output file of the T&E model which presents species-specific reductions in I&E mortality of T&E

species under regulatory options 1 through 4

File Info 1 of 2
species region region.ae1 option.1 option.2 option.3 option.4

paddlefish inland 17627.72 8630.605 15945.67 16317.39 8419.903

pallid.sturgeon inland 87.83187 73.47893 84.89592 85.72126 71.68506

topeka.shiner inland 3668.866 3069.323 3546.227 3580.703 2994.39

T&E_Losses 2 of 2
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Natividad Mendoza, Appellant.

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Richard Lowe, J.), rendered on February 1, 1989, convicting defendant, upon a plea of guilty of attempted criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree and sentencing defendant to an indeterminate term of imprisonment of *2>Vi*to 7 years, unanimously affirmed.

We are unpersuaded that the sentence imposed was unduly harsh or severe. Taking into account, "among other things, the crime charged, the particular circumstances of the individual before the court and the purpose of a penal sanction”, we perceive no abuse of discretion warranting a reduction in sentence. *(People v Farrar,*52 NY2d 302, 305.)

Further, defendant was sentenced in accordance with his plea bargain and within statutory guidelines. "Having received the benefit of his bargain, defendant should be bound by its terms.” *(People v Felman,*141 AD2d 889, 890, *lv denied*72 NY2d 918.) Concur—Murphy, P. J., Wallach, Asch, Kassal and Smith, JJ.
I

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 3986

To rescind certain unauthorized supplemental appropriations for fiscal year

1994, and for other purposes.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 9, 1994

Mr. FAWELL (for himself, Mr. ARCHER, Mr. BALLENGER, Mr. BARTLETT of

Maryland, Mr. BOEHNER, Mr. BURTON of Indiana, Mr. COX, Mr. CRANE,

Mr. CRAPO, Mr. DEFAZIO, Mr. DOOLITTLE, Mr. EHLERS, Mr. EWING,

Mrs. FOWLER, Mr. GILCHREST, Mr. GOODLATTE, Mr. GOODLING, Mr.

HANCOCK, Mr. HEFLEY, Mr. HERGER, Mr. HOEKSTRA, Mr. KING, Mr.

MANZULLO, Mr. MILLER of Florida, Mr. NUSSLE, Mr. OXLEY, Mr.

PAXON, Mr. PENNY, Mr. PETERSON of Minnesota, Mr. RAMSTAD, Mr.

SENSENBRENNER, Mr. SMITH of Texas, Mr. STEARNS, and Mr. ZIMMER)

introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on

Appropriations

A BILL

To rescind certain unauthorized supplemental appropriations

for fiscal year 1994, and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Supplemental Appro5 priations Rescissions Act of 1994’’.
2

•HR 3986 IH

1 SEC. 2. RESCISSION OF FUNDS FOR AUTOMATION OF FIN2 GERPRINT IDENTIFICATION SERVICES.

3 Of the funds made available under the heading ‘‘Fed4 eral Bureau of Investigation—Salaries and Expenses’’ in

5 chapter 2 of title II of Public Law 103–211, $20,000,000

6 is rescinded.

7 SEC. 3. REPEAL OF AUTHORITY TO USE CERTAIN PRO8 CEEDS FOR NUCLEAR SHIP SAVANNAH.

9 Chapter 2 of title II of Public Law 103–211 is

10 amended by striking the paragraph under the heading

11 ‘‘Maritime Administration—Administrative Provision’’.

12 SEC. 4. RESCISSION OF FUNDS FOR CONVERSION OF POST

13 OFFICE TO TRAIN STATION AND COMMER14 CIAL CENTER.

15 Of the funds made available under the heading ‘‘Fed16 eral Railroad Administration—Pennsylvania Station Re17 development Project’’ in chapter 6 of title II of Public Law

18 103–211, $10,000,000 is rescinded.

19 SEC. 5. RESCISSION OF FUNDS FOR HILO-HAMAKUA COAST

20 OF HAWAII.

21 (a) IN GENERAL.—Of the $260,000,000 earmarked

22 for special purpose grants in the 14th proviso under the

23 heading ‘‘Department of Housing and Urban Develop24 ment—Housing Programs—Annual Contributions for As25 sisted Housing’’ in Public Law 102–389, $1,300,000 is

26 rescinded, to be derived from the amount made available
3

•HR 3986 IH

1 for continued assistance to 2 sugarcane mills on the Hilo2 Hamakua Coast of Hawaii.

3 (b) RELATED REPEAL.—Chapter 8 of title II of Pub4 lic Law 103–211 is amended by striking the 1st paragraph

5 under the heading ‘‘Department of Housing and Urban

6 Development—Housing Programs—Administrative Provi7 sions’’.

Æ
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Miguel Caban, Appellant.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Rienzi, J.), rendered December 18, 1986, convicting him of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the first degree and criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution *(see, People v Contes,*60 NY2d 620), we find that it is legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt is not against the weight of the evidence (CPL 470.15 [5]). The defendant failed to rebut the presumption of possession set forth in Penal Law § 220.25 (2), which, under the facts and circumstances of this case, applied to him *(see, People v Martinez,*150 AD2d 728; *People v Perez,*150 AD2d 507).

The defendant’s remaining contentions are either without merit or unpreserved for appellate review (CPL 470.05 [2]) and we decline to review them in the exercise of our interest of justice jurisdiction. Thompson, J. P., Brown, Lawrence and Eiber, JJ., concur.
FMS Form 1201DFAS

FOR ASSISTANCE WITH ENROLLMENTS, PLEASE CALL (877) 597-3055

(January 2014) Previous versions obsolete

C.

B.

CERTIFICATION

DIRECTIONS

D. FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

Sign-Up Form for theDirect Express Card for Benefit Payments ®

A. FEDERAL BENEFIT RECIPIENT INFORMATION (print name[s] and addresses exactly as they appear on your benefit check)

If your name or address as it appears on your benefit check is incorrect, please complete the section below with the correct information as it should appear on your Direct Express® Card

REQUIRED

REQUIRED

REQUIRED REQUIRED

REQUIRED

REQUIRED

REQUIRED REQUIRED

BIRTH DATE ( MM - DD - YY ) REQUIRED DAYTIME TELEPHONE NUMBER E-MAIL

LAST SUFFIX

NAME OF PERSON ENTITLED TO GOVERNMENT BENEFITS

FIRST MI

ADDRESS: STREET 1

STREET 2

CITY STATE ZIP CODE

You must complete ALL REQUIRED information in boxes A and B. 

Only complete this form to sign up for the Direct Express® card if you are an individual who receives benefit payments. 

Please read the information on page 2 before completing this form.

Direct Express® and the Direct Express® logo are registered service marks of the U.S. Department of the Treasury, Bureau of the Fiscal Service

I certify that the above information is true, accurate, and complete. I authorize the U.S. Department of the Treasury or its fiscal agent to share the information contained in this 

document with Treasury’s financial agent and the Direct Express® card issuer, Comerica Bank (or its contractors), for the purpose of establishing a Direct Express® card account to 

be used for the receipt of my benefit payments. I understand that Comerica Bank issues the Direct Express® card and that the card is subject to the terms, conditions and fees as 

described at www.USDirectExpress.com. I authorize the Federal agency that pays my benefits to credit all of my payments to my Direct Express® card account after it is 

established. I understand that the Direct Express® card will be mailed to me once my personal information and eligibility to receive benefits have been confirmed.

Return the completed form to:

U.S Treasury

Electronic Payment Solution Center

P.O. Box 650527

Dallas, TX 75265-0527

(See page 2 for cancellation information.) 

SIGNATURE DATE

LAST SUFFIX

FIRST MI

ADDRESS: STREET 1

STREET 2

CITY STATE ZIP CODE

SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBER

OMB No. 1510-0007

CARD ROUTING NUMBER

RETIRED MILITARY PAY

ANNUITANT PAY

DAN

FORMER SPOUSE PAY

RETIREE 

SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBER

SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBER OF DECEASED RETIREE

SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBER

FORMER SPOUSE

SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBER OF RETIREE

ANNUITANT

If you are receiving multiple forms of benefit payment ( i.e. retirement benefits and an annuity or former spouse benefit )

you MUST complete one form for each benefit type.
##### 



EXHIBIT
4.8.1
 SUPPLEMENTAL INDENTURE
PROVIDING FOR THE AMENDMENT OF THE
INDENTURE, DATED AS OF DECEMBER 30, 2005
  Preliminary Statements
    1. Amendment of the Indenture.
   2. Effect of Supplemental Indenture.
 3. Trustee.




---



##### 



PAXSON COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATIONBy:
    /s/  Adam K. WeinsteinName:
    Adam K. WeinsteinTitle:
    Senior Vice President, Secretary and Chief Legal Officer SUBSIDIARY GUARANTORS
 
 2




---



##### 



3




---



##### 



By:
    /s/  Richard GarciaName:
    Richard GarciaTitle:
    Vice President and Treasurer of
each of such Subsidiary Guarantors 4




---



##### 



AMERICA 51, L.P.By:
    Paxson Communications of Phoenix-51, Inc.,its General Partner and Limited PartnerBy:
    Paxson Communications Television, Inc.,its Limited PartnerBy:
    /s/  Richard GarciaName:
    Richard GarciaTitle:
    Vice President and Treasurer of
such General and Limited PartnersTHE BANK OF NEW YORK TRUST COMPANY, NA, as TrusteeBy:
    /s/  Geraldine CreswellName:
    Geraldine CreswellTitle:
    Assistant Treasurer 5
PM (M5) PM10 PM2.5 SO2 SAM CO NOx VOC Pb GHG

Converters only 121.29 814.50 765.51 6003.34 25.73 17.31 20.61 1.13 4.10 24884.72

Actual Years 2010-2011 2010-2011 2010-2011 2009-2010 2009-2010 2010-2011 2010-2011 2010-2011 2010-2011 2010-2011

Converters only 59.64 450.70 375.98 21489.72 54.66 8.09 10.75 0.59 1.45 12982.15

Increase/Decrease 61.65 363.80 389.53 -15486.38 -28.93 9.22 9.86 0.54 2.64 11902.58

Significant Increase? Yes Yes Yes No No No No No Yes No

Netting Needed? Yes Yes Yes No No No No No Yes No

Plus Revert Screen 2.64 2.64 2.64 NR NR NR NR NR 0.00 NR

Plus Anode Furnace -61.84 -425.96 -375.60 NR NR NR NR NR -1.70 NR

Plus Flash Vent Impr. -10.63 -17.21 -15.69 NR NR NR NR NR -0.45 NR

Net Increase/Decrease -8.18 -76.73 0.88 -15486.38 -28.93 9.22 9.86 0.54 0.49 11902.58

PSD/NNSR Required? No No No No No No No No No No

ASARCO LLC - Hayden Smelter

2013 Converter Aisle Retrofit Project

Netting Analysis:

Potential to Emit

Actual Emissions

PSD Analysis
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 06-7910
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus GEORGE WILSON, III, Defendant - Appellant.
No. 06-8007
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus GEORGE WILSON, III, Defendant - Appellant. Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Albert V. Bryan, Jr., Senior District Judge. (1:93-cr-00461-AVB; 1:97-cv-00696-AVB) Submitted: February 15, 2007 De cided: February 26, 2007 Before NIEMEYER, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.- 2 - Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. George Wilson, III, Appellant Pro Se. John Thomas Martin, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.* To the extent Wilson may be seeking authorization from this court to file a second or successive 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000) motion, we deny the request. - 3 - PER CURIAM: In these consolidated appeals, George Wilson III seeks to appeal the district court’s order construing his motion as one filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000) and denying relief because he did not have authorization from this court under 28 U.S.C. § 2244 (2000). He also appeals two margin orders denying his motions for reconsideration. Wilson was clearly attacking his sentence and because he had previously filed a § 2255 motion, the district court correctly found it was without authority to consider these filings unless Wilson had authorization from this court. * See§ 2244. In addition, Wilson appeals the district court’s orders denying his request for records and files and denying two motions for reconsideration. Because there was no reason to grant the relief sought, we affirm. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s orders. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED