1 |EnergyEfficiencyandRenewableEnergyeere.energy.govTestProceduresNoticeofProposedRulemakingforCeilingFanLightKitsEnergyConservationStandardsPreliminaryAnalysisforCeilingFanLightKitsNovember18,2014LucydeButtsDepartmentofEnergyBuildingTechnologiesProgramTP: EE‐2014–BT–TP–0007CFLK2014TP0007@ee.doe.govECS: EERE‐2012‐BT‐STD‐0045CeilingFanLightKits2012STD004@ee.doe.gov2Welcome•Introductions(aroundtheroom)•RoleoftheFacilitator•GroundRules-Speakoneatatime.-Sayyournamefortherecord– therewillbeacompletetranscriptofthismeeting.-Beconcise– sharethe‘air‐time.’-Keepthefocushere– cellphonesonsilent;limitsidebarconversations.-Webinarparticipantsturnphoneonmute;“raiseyourhand”toberecognizedtospeak.•HousekeepingItems•AgendaReview•OpeningRemarks3PublicMeetingAgenda:Morning9:00– 9:10amWelcome andIntroductionsCeilingFanLightKitProposedTestProcedures9:10– 9:30amOpeningStatements;TPRegulatoryHistory;RulemakingOverview9:30– 10:10amExistingProductClasses,Metrics,andTestProcedures;ProposedAmendmentstoCurrentTestProcedures10:10– 10:50amProposedTestProcedurestoSupportStandardsRulemaking10:50– 11:00amBreak11:00– 11:35amUpdatedGuidanceonAccentLighting;Clarificationsto10CFR430.32(s);EffectiveandComplianceDates;SamplingPlan11:35– 11:50amReviewUndertheRegulatoryFlexibilityAct11:50am– 12:00pmClosingRemarks12:00– 1:00pmLunch4PublicMeetingAgenda:AfternoonCeilingFanLightKitEnergyConservationStandardsPreliminaryAnalysis1:00– 1:20pmOpeningStatements;ECSRegulatoryHistory;RulemakingOverview1:20– 1:40pmScope;Market&TechnologyAssessment1:40– 2:10pmScreeningandEngineeringAnalyses2:10– 2:20pmProductPriceDetermination2:20– 2:30pmBreak2:30– 2:55pmEnergyUse;LifeCycleCostAnalyses2:55– 3:30pmShipments;NationalImpactAnalyses3:30– 3:40pmPreliminaryManufacturerImpactAnalysis3:40– 3:50pmNOPRAnalyses3:50– 4:00pmClosingRemarksandAdjourn5ListeningviatheWebcast• DOEisbroadcastingthismeetingliveovertheInternet.• DOEisprovidingthewebcasttoaccommodatestakeholdersthatareunabletoattendthepublicmeetinginperson.• Thewebbroadcastallowsstakeholderstolisteninandviewtheslides.• Allstakeholdersareencouragedtosubmitwrittencommentsafterthepublicmeeting.6PurposeofthisPublicMeeting1. ReviewstatuteandDOEactionsforceilingfanlightkits(CFLKs)2. PresentDOE’sproposedtestproceduresforCFLKs3. PresentenergyconservationstandardsDOEisconsideringforCFLKsinthePreliminaryAnalysis4. InvitecommentfromparticipantsonthetestproceduresandPreliminaryAnalysis5. Discussthenextstepsfortherulemakings6. Encourageparticipantstosubmitdata,information,summarystatements,andwrittencomments,includingadditionalissuesfordiscussion7ProposedCeilingFanLightKit(CFLK)TestProcedures8IssueforDiscussionIssueboxnumberingcorrespondstothelistofissuespublishedattheendoftheTestProcedureNOPR,availableatregulations.gov,underdocketnumber:EE‐2014–BT–TP–0007,athttp://www.regulations.gov/#!documentDetail;D=EERE‐2014‐BT‐TP‐0007‐0001ThedeadlineforsubmittingcommentsontheTestProcedureNOPRis:January14,2015IssueBox:DOEwelcomescomments,data,andinformationconcerningtheproposedCFLKstestprocedures.IssuesthatcorrespondtothoseraisedinDOE’spublishedmaterialwillbenumberedinaccordancewiththatmaterial.Whetherinvitedbyanissueboxornot,commentsarewelcomeonanypartofDOE’sanalysis.9HowtoSubmitWrittenComments•Inallcorrespondence,pleaserefertotheCFLKtestprocedurerulemakingby:– TestProcedureforCeilingFanLightKits;– DocketNumberEE‐2014–BT–TP–0007;and– RegulatoryIdentificationNumber(RIN)1904‐AD17.•Email:CFLK2014TP0007@ee.doe.govPostal:Courier:Ms.BrendaEdwardsU.S.DepartmentofEnergyBuildingTechnologiesProgram,MailstopEE‐5B1000IndependenceAvenue,SWWashington,DC20585‐0121Ms.BrendaEdwardsU.S.DepartmentofEnergyBuildingTechnologiesProgram,Suite600950L’EnfantPlaza,SWWashington,DC20024Tel:202586‐2945TestProcedureNOPRCommentPeriodcloses:January14,2015,11:59PMEDT10OpeningRemarksMeetingparticipantsareinvitedtoprovideopeningremarksorstatementsatthistime.11CFLKsTPRulemakingScheduleMilestone DateTestProcedureNOPRpublishedBeginningof75‐daycommentperiodOctober31,2014Endof75‐daycommentperiod January14,2015FinalruletoestablishanyfinaltestproceduresforCFLKs Q32015TestProcedureeffectivedate(projected)foramendmentstocurrentCFLKTP(proposedAppendixV)Q32015(30daysafterfinalrule)TestProcedurecompliancedate(projected)forproposedCFLKtestprocedure(proposedAppendixV1)tosupportCFLKECSrulemakingQ2*2019*Calendaryearquarter2015 2016201912RegulatoryHistory– TestProcedure•TitleIIIoftheEnergyPolicyandConservationAct(EPCA)establishesthe“EnergyConservationProgramforConsumerProductsOtherThanAutomobiles,”whichincludesCFLKs.•TheEnergyPolicyActof2005(EPAct)amendedEPCAandestablishedenergyconservationstandardsforCFLKs,aswellasrequirementsfortheCFLKtestprocedures.•EPAct2005requiredtheCFLKstestprocedurebebasedonthetestproceduresreferencedintheENERGYSTARspecificationsforresidentiallightfixturesandcompactfluorescentlightbulbs.•OnDecember8,2006,DOEpublishedafinalruleintheFederalRegisterfortestproceduresforCFLKs.71FR71340.•DOEisconductingthistestprocedurerulemakingforCFLKspursuantto42U.S.C.6295(r).13RegulatoryHistory– TestProcedure•TheEnergyIndependenceandSecurityActof2007(EISA)setforthrequirementsfortestprocedures:•Atleastonceevery7yearsDOEmustconductanevaluationofallcoveredproductsandeitheramendthetestproceduresorpublishadeterminationintheFederalRegisternottoamendthem.•Fortestproceduresofcoveredproductsthatdonotfullyaccountforstandby‐modeandoff‐modeenergyconsumption,EISA2007directsDOEtoamenditstestprocedurestoaccountforstandby‐modeandoff‐modeenergyconsumption,unlessitistechnicallyinfeasibletodoso.•TheexistingtestproceduresforCFLKsarespecifiedinAppendixVtoSubpartBofpart430ofTitle10oftheCFR.14ScopeofCoverage•EPCAdefinesaCFLKas“equipmentdesignedtoprovidelightfromaceilingfanthatcanbe•(A)integral,suchthattheequipmentisattachedtotheceilingfanpriortothetimeofretailsale;or•(B)attachable,suchthatatthetimeofretailsaletheequipmentisnotphysicallyattachedtotheceilingfan,butmaybeincludedinsidetheceilingfanatthetimeofsaleorsoldseparatelyforsubsequentattachmenttothefan.”(42U.S.C.6291(50)(A)and(B))•Therefore,anyequipmentdesignedtoprovidelightfromproductsthataredefinedasCFsundertheCFsrulemakingwillbeincludedinthescopeoftheCFLKrulemaking.15CFLKTestProceduresNOPRPresentationOverviewProposed Test Procedures to Support Standards Rulemaking3Existing Product Classes, Metrics, and Test Procedures1Proposed Amendments to Current Test Procedures2Clarifications to the Energy Conservation Standards4Determination of Represented Values516CurrentTestProcedureApplicabilityandEfficiencyMetrics•CurrentlytherearethreeproductclassesforCFLKsandthemetricsandtestprocedurerequirementsvarybyproductclassCurrentProductClassesProductClass Description EfficiencyMetric*TestProcedure orDesignStandard1CFLKswithmediumscrewbase(MSB)socketsLampefficacy(lm/W) Testprocedure2CFLKswithpin‐basedfluorescentsocketsSystem efficacy(lm/W) Testprocedure3 AllotherCFLKs WattageLimiter Designstandard*CFLKswithmediumscrew‐basesocketsmustbepackagedwithlampstofill allsocketsandthoselampsmustmeetadditionalspecificationsinENERGYSTARProgramRequirementsforCompactFluorescentLamps,version3.0.CFLKswith pin‐basedsocketsmustalsouseanelectronicballastandbepackagedwithlampstofillallsockets.17DOE’sCurrentTestProcedures•DOE'stestproceduresfordeterminingtheefficiencyforCFLKsinproductclass1and2arecodifiedinAppendixVtosubpartBofpart430ofTitle10oftheCFR;DOEhasnotestablishedatestprocedureforproductclass3CFLKs.ProductClass 1ProductClass2ProductClass3“CFLRequirementsforTesting”ofthe“ENERGYSTARProgramRequirementsforCompactFluorescentLamps,”Version3.0,whichreferencesIESLM‐66‐00forlampefficacymeasurements“ENERGYSTARProgramRequirementsforResidentialLightFixtures,”Version4.0,whichreferencesIESLM‐66‐00andIESLM‐9‐99forsystemefficacymeasurementsNone18ProposedTestProcedures:Twophaseprocess•DOEproposestomakeminorclarificationsandamendmentstothecurrenttestprocedures(i.e.,updatestotestprocedurereferences).•BecausetheamendmentswillnotchangethemeasuredCFLKefficiency,DOEproposesthatthetestprocedurewillbeeffective30daysafterpublicationandmanufacturersmustmakeanyrepresentationswithrespecttoenergyuseorefficiencyofceilingfanlightkitsbeginning180daysafterpublicationofthefinalruleintheFederalRegister.•AspartofthisNOPR,DOEproposestoaddnewtestproceduresthatwouldrevisethemethodsformeasuringtheenergyefficiencyofCFLKstosupporttheconcurrentenergyconservationstandardsrulemaking.•DOEproposesnewtestproceduresthatsupportthestandardsrulemakingforCFLKsandwouldberequiredatthecompliancedateofapotentialamendedCFLKstandard.19CFLKTestProceduresNOPRPresentationOverviewProposed Test Procedures to Support Standards Rulemaking3Existing Product Classes, Metrics, and Test Procedures1Proposed Amendments to Current Test Procedures2Clarifications to the Energy Conservation Standards4Determination of Represented Values520ProposedAmendmentstoCurrentTestProcedures•DOE’sintentionwiththeproposedchangestothecurrentCFLKtestprocedureistoharmonizetherepresentedvaluesoflampefficacy,whereverpossible,withthecoveredlampregulations.•DOEbelievesthiswillreduceburdenonCFLKmanufacturersiftheypurchasecoveredlampsratedpursuanttoDOE’sregulationstobepackagedwiththeirCFLKs.•DOEproposestomakethefollowingamendmentstothecurrenttestproceduresforproductclasses1and2:ProductClassCurrentTestProcedure ProposedChangetoCurrentTestProcedure(s)1(MSB)“CFLRequirementsforTesting”ofthe“ENERGYSTARProgramRequirementsforCompactFluorescentLamps,”Version3.0DOEtestprocedureforMSBCFLlamps:10CFR430,subpartB,appendix W2(Pin‐Base)“ENERGYSTARProgramRequirementsforResidentialLightFixtures,”Version4.0Currentindustrytestprocedures:IESLM‐66‐11orIESLM‐9‐09System Efficacywouldremainthemetric21ProposedAmendmentstoCurrentTestProceduresIssue1:CFLKswithMSBLampsDOErequestscommentsontheproposedchangesforexistingtestproceduresforCFLKspackagedwithmediumscrewbaselamps.Issue2:CFLKswithPin‐BasedFluorescentLampsDOErequestscommentsontheproposedchangesforexistingtestproceduresforCFLKspackagedwithpin‐basedfluorescentlamps.22CFLKTestProceduresNOPRPresentationOverviewProposed Test Procedures to Support Standards Rulemaking3Existing Product Classes, Metrics, and Test Procedures1Proposed Amendments to Current Test Procedures2Clarifications to the Energy Conservation Standards4Determination of Represented Values523ProposedTestProcedurestoSupportStandardsRulemaking•DOEisproposingtoaddnewtestproceduresthatwouldsupporttheconcurrentenergyconservationstandardsrulemakingforCFLKs.Specifically,DOEis:1. proposingtouseanefficiencymetric—efficacy(lm/W)—toquantifytheenergyefficiencyofallCFLKs2. proposingtoupdatetheactivemodetestprocedurestoreferencecurrentDOEorindustrylamptestprocedures3. NOTproposingtoincorporateanyenergyconsumptioninstandbyoroffmodeintotheCFLKefficiencymetric.241.ProposedMetric•DOEproposestouseefficacy,measuredinlumensperwatt,toquantifytheenergyefficiencyofallCFLKs.•LampEfficacy:ForCFLKswithconsumer‐replaceablelamps•LuminaireEfficacy:ForCFLKswithintegralsolid‐statelighting(SSL)circuitry251.ProposedMetric•LuminaireEfficacy•TheluminaireefficacyofeachbasicmodelofCFLKwithintegralSSLcircuitrywouldbedetermined.•“CFLKswithintegralSSLcircuitry”means:1. CFLKsthathaveSSLdriversand/orlightsources(e.g.,anLEDarrayormodule)thatarenotconsumerreplaceable,or2. CFLKsthathaveSSLdriversandlightsourcesthatareconsumerreplaceable,buttheSSLdriverandlightsourceareseparatedbyadditionalintermediatecircuitrywithintheCFLK(e.g.,wiringbetweenareplaceabledriverandareplaceablelightsource).261.ProposedMetricLampEfficacyMeasurementLuminaireEfficacyMeasurementConsumer‐ReplaceableLampNon‐ReplaceableSSLSourceand DriverNon‐ReplaceableSSLDriverReplaceableSSLSourceand Driver(butseparatedbysocketand/orwiring)271.ProposedMetricIssue5:EfficacyMeasurementsofLampsandLuminairesDOErequestscommentsonitsproposaltouselampefficacywhentechnicallyfeasibleandotherwiseluminaireefficacytodeterminetheefficiencyofCFLKs.Issue7:CFLKswithIntegralSSLCircuitryDOErequestscommentonitsassessmentthatitistechnicallyinfeasibletomeasurethelampefficacyofCFLKswithintegratedSSLcircuitryeitherbecauseitwouldrequiredestructivedisassemblyoftheCFLKormeasurementofconsumerreplaceablelightsourceanddriver[withoutintegratedcircuitry],whichwouldnotresultinvalidrepresentationsofthelightsourceefficacy.282.ProposedActiveModeTestProcedures•DOEproposestodetermineCFLKefficiencyaccordingtoDOEtestproceduresforthegivenlamp,whenpossible,andwithindustrytestproceduresotherwise.DOEiscurrentlyengagedintestprocedurerulemakingsforCFLsandintegratedLEDlamps.LightingTechnologyLamporLuminaireEfficacyMeasuredReferenced TestProcedureCompactfluorescent lamps(CFLs) LampefficacyAppendixWtoSubpartBof10CFR430Generalservicefluorescentlamps(GSFLs) andgeneralserviceincandescentlamps(GSILs)LampefficacyAppendixRtoSubpartBof10CFR430Other(non‐CFL andnon‐GSFL)fluorescentlampsLampefficacy IESLM‐9‐09IntegratedLEDlamps LampefficacyAppendixBBtoSubpartBof10CFR430AllotherSSLlamps Lampefficacy IESLM‐79‐08CFLKswithintegratedSSL circuitry Luminaireefficacy IESLM‐79‐08292.ProposedActiveModeTestProcedures•ForCFLKsthatutilizemultiplelampmodels,DOEproposesthateachlampmodelbetestedaccordingtotheappropriatelamptestprocedureforeachlamptype.•ReferencingexistingDOElamptestprocedureswillminimizetheoveralltestingburden(i.e.,lampsalreadytestedperDOEtestprocedureswouldnotrequireadditionaltesting).•ForCFLKsthathavebothconsumerreplaceablelampsandintegratedSSLcircuitry,DOEproposesthatlampefficacybereportedfortheconsumerreplaceablelampsandthatluminaireefficacybereportedfortheCFLKintegratedSSLcircuitry,withtheconsumerreplaceablelampsremoved.303.Standby/Off‐ModeEnergyConsumption•DOEisnotproposingtoincorporateenergyconsumptioninstandbymodeintheCFLKefficiencymetricandhasdeterminedthereisnoenergyconsumptionintheoffmode;therefore,DOEisnotproposingstandbyoroffmodetestprocedures.•StandbymodeenergyconsumptionforlightkitspackagedwithCFsismeasuredaspartoftheproposedCFtestprocedure.Issue9:Standby/Off‐ModeEnergyConsumptionDOErequestscommentonitsapproachtoaddressingstandbypowerconsumptioninCFLKs.31CFLKTestProceduresNOPRPresentationOverviewProposed Test Procedures to Support Standards Rulemaking3Determination of Represented Values5Existing Product Classes, Metrics, and Test Procedures1Proposed Amendments to Current Test Procedures2Clarifications to the Energy Conservation Standards432Clarificationsto10CFR430.32(s)•CFLKenergyconservationstandardsarecodifiedin10CFR430.32(s).•DOEproposestoreplacereferencestoENERGYSTARprogramrequirementsin10CFR430.32(s)withtablesthatcontainthespecificperformancerequirements.Performancerequirementsinclude:CFLKspackagedwithMSBCFLs:lampefficacy,lumenmaintenanceat1,000hours,lumenmaintenanceat40%oflifetime,rapidcyclestress,andlifetimeCFLKspackagedwithMSBlightsourcesotherthanCFLs:lampefficacyCFLKspackagedwithpin‐basedfluorescents:systemefficacy,electronicballastrequired•Thecurrentenergyconservationrequirementsremainunchanged.33UpdatedGuidanceonAccentLighting•DOEpreviouslyissuedguidanceonaccentlightingusedinCFLKs,stating,“DOEdoesnotconsiderceilingfanaccentlightingthatisnotasignificantlightsourcetobepartofthe190‐wattlimitation[forclass3CFLKs].”•Becauseitisdifficulttoquantitativelydefine“asignificantlightsource”inaCFLK,andmayresultininconsistencyintheapplicationofCFLKstandards,DOEproposesto:1. withdrawthecurrentguidanceonaccentlighting30daysafterthepublicationofthefinalrule,and2. consideralllightingpackagedwithanyCFLKtobesubjecttoenergyconservationrequirements.Issue4:AccentLightingDOErequestscommentonitswithdrawalofcurrentguidanceonaccentlightinginCFLKsandproposaltoconsideralllightingpackagedwithallCFLKstobesubjecttoenergyconservationrequirements.34CFLKTestProceduresNOPRPresentationOverviewProposed Test Procedures to Support Standards Rulemaking3Determination of Represented Values5Existing Product Classes, Metrics, and Test Procedures1Proposed Amendments to Current Test Procedures2Clarifications to Energy Conservation Standards435DeterminationofRepresentedValues•Therequirementsof10CFR429.11(“Generalsamplingrequirementsforselectingunitstobetested”)areapplicabletoCFLKs,exceptthat,forCFLKssubjecttoadesignstandard,eachunitmustmeetthedesignstandard.•ForeachbasicmodelofCFLK,thefollowingrequirementsareapplicableforcompliancewiththecurrentenergyconservationstandards:CFLKSocketTypeBulb TypeIncludedinCFLKPackageRepresentedValuesShallbeDeterminedinAccordanceWith:MSBCFL 10CFRPart429.35IntegratedLED 10CFRPart429.56GeneralServiceIncandescent10CFRPart429.27Pin‐based Fluorescent 10CFR 429.35AllOthersSocketTypes 10CFR 430.32(s)(4)36DeterminationofRepresentedValues•ForeachbasicmodelofCFLK,thefollowingrequirementsareapplicableforcompliancewithamendedenergyconservationstandards,ifestablished:Lamp TypeIncludedinCFLKPackage RepresentedValuesShallbeDeterminedinAccordanceWith:CFL 10CFR Part429.35GeneralService FluorescentandIncandescentLamps10CFR Part429.27IntegratedLED 10CFR Part429.56OtherFluorescentLamps(NotCFLsorGSFLs) 10CFRPart429.35OtherSSL(notintegratedLED) 10CFR Part429.56CFLKswithIntegratedSSLCircuitry 10CFR429.3337HowtoSubmitWrittenComments•Inallcorrespondence,pleaserefertotheCFLKtestprocedurerulemakingby:– TestProcedureforCeilingFanLightKits;– DocketNumberEE‐2014–BT–TP–0007;and– RegulatoryIdentificationNumber(RIN)1904‐AD17.•Email:CFLK2014TP0007@ee.doe.govPostal:Courier:Ms.BrendaEdwardsU.S.DepartmentofEnergyBuildingTechnologiesProgram,MailstopEE‐5B1000IndependenceAvenue,SWWashington,DC20585‐0121Ms.BrendaEdwardsU.S.DepartmentofEnergyBuildingTechnologiesProgram,Suite600950L’EnfantPlaza,SWWashington,DC20024Tel:202586‐2945TestProcedureNOPRCommentPeriodcloses:January14,2015,11:59PMEDT38CFLKEnergyConservationStandardsPreliminaryAnalysis39HowtoSubmitWrittenCommentsforCFLKs•Inallcorrespondence,pleaserefertotheCFLKrulemakingby:– EnergyConservationStandardsforCeilingFanLightKits;– DocketNumberEERE‐2012‐BT‐STD‐0045;and– RegulatoryIdentificationNumber(RIN)1904‐AC87.•Email:CeilingFanLightKits2012STD0045@ee.doe.govPostal:Courier:Ms.BrendaEdwardsU.S.DepartmentofEnergyBuildingTechnologiesProgram,MailstopEE‐2J1000IndependenceAvenue,SWWashington,DC20585‐0121Ms.BrendaEdwardsU.S.DepartmentofEnergyBuildingTechnologiesProgram,Suite600950L’EnfantPlaza,SWWashington,DC20024Tel:202586‐2945EnergyConservationStandardsTSDCommentPeriodcloses:December30,2014,11:59PMEDT40OpeningRemarksMeetingparticipantsareinvitedtoprovideopeningremarksorstatementsatthistime.41CFLKsECSRulemakingScheduleMilestone DateNoticeofPublicMeetingandAvailabilityofCFsandCFLKsFrameworkDocumentMarch11,2013NoticeofPublicMeetingandAvailabilityofCFLKsPreliminaryTechnicalSupportDocumentOctober31,2014NoticeofProposedRulemakingforCFLKs(projected)Q3*2015FinalRuleforCFLKs(projected)Q2*2016ComplianceDateforCFLKs(projected)Q2*2019*Calendarquarters2013 2014 2016 2017 2018 20202015201942RegulatoryHistory:EnergyConservationStandards•TheEnergyPolicyActof2005amendedtheEnergyPolicyandConservationActof1975(EPCA)byaddingCFLKsascoveredproducts.(42U.S.C.6295(ff))−ProvidedDOEtheabilitytoestablishenergyconservationstandardsfor“ceilingfanlightkits,”asdefinedby42U.S.C.6291(50),andsetforthrequirementsfordeterminingwhetherstandardsshouldbeamended.•OnOctober18,2005,DOEpublishedafinalruletechnicalamendment(70FR60407,60413)codifyingenergyefficiencystandardsfortwoproductclassesofCFLKs.•OnJanuary11,2007,DOEpublishedafinalruletechnicalamendmentcodifyingenergyefficiencystandardsforathirdproductclassofCFLKs.72FR1270.•DOEisconductingthisenergyconservationstandardsrulemakingpursuantto42U.S.C.6295(ff)(5).43CFLKECSPre‐AnalysisPresentationOverviewScreening Analysis3Product Price Determination5Scope of Coverage1Energy Use6Market & Technology2Closing Remarks11Engineering Analysis4Life-Cycle Cost Analysis7Shipments; National Impact Analysis8Preliminary MIA9NOPR Analyses1044ScopeofCoverage•EPCAdefinesaCFLKas“equipmentdesignedtoprovidelightfromaceilingfanthatcanbe•(A)integral,suchthattheequipmentisattachedtotheceilingfanpriortothetimeofretailsale;or•(B)attachable,suchthatatthetimeofretailsaletheequipmentisnotphysicallyattachedtotheceilingfan,butmaybeincludedinsidetheceilingfanatthetimeofsaleorsoldseparatelyforsubsequentattachmenttothefan.”(42U.S.C.6291(50)(A)and(B))•Therefore,anyequipmentdesignedtoprovidelightfromproductsthataredefinedasCFsundertheCFsrulemakingwillbeincludedinthescopeoftheCFLKrulemaking.45CFLKECSPre‐AnalysisPresentationOverviewScreening Analysis3Product Price Determination5Scope of Coverage1Energy Use6Market & Technology2Closing Remarks11Engineering Analysis4Life-Cycle Cost Analysis7Shipments; National Impact Analysis8Preliminary MIA9NOPR Analyses1046Market&TechnologyAssessment•Purpose:•CharacterizetheCFLKmarket•Defineproductclasses•Identifytechnologyoptions•Method:•IdentifyandcharacterizemanufacturersofCFLKs•Identifyexistingregulatoryandvoluntaryefficiencyprograms•Gatherhistoricalshipmentandotherrelevantmarketdata•Estimatemarkettrends•Identifymeasuresthatcouldimproveefficiency47MarketAssessment•CFLKsusedwithlow‐volumeCFs•Currentlythreeproductclasses:1. Mediumscrewbasesockets2. Pin‐basedsockets(forexternally‐ballastedfluorescentlamps)3. AllotherCFLKsProductclassShelfSurveys OnlineWeightedTotalMarketSharebyProductClassBaseTypeMarketSharebyBaseTypeMarketSharebyProductClassMarketSharebyBaseTypeProductClass115.1% Mediumscrewbase 15.1% 16.9% 16.9% 15.1%20.0%Pin‐basedfluorescent0.0% 0.5% 0.5% <1%384.9%Candelabra(includingminicandelabra)79.2%82.4%68.8%84.8%GU24 4.6% 12.8%Others(e.g.,G9,GU10,integralsolid‐statelighting)1.2% 0.8%100% 100% 100% 100% 100%EstimatesofCFLKMarketSharesin2012byCurrentProductClassandSocketType:48MarketAssessmentNPDEstimatesofHistoricalShipmentsofCFs:(source:NPDGroup,2007‐2011)DOEEstimatesofHistoricalShipmentsofCFs:(basedonNPDdataabove,assumingratioofCFssoldwithandwithoutCFLKsisequivalentforcustomerswhodidanddidnotspecify)NumberofUnits 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011WithCFLK18,360,000 18,180,000 19,160,000 16,870.000 16,480,000WithoutCFLK2,680,000 2,610,000 2,520,000 2,560,000 2,290,000Total21,050,000 20,790,000 21,680,000 19,430,000 18,770,000%withCFLK87% 87% 88% 87% 88%NumberofUnits 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011WithCFLK14,899,594 15,485,300 16,015,248 14,414,909 14,597,241WithoutCFLK2,176,229 2,226,826 2,106,832 2,184,390 2,035,746NotSpecified3,970,371 3,080,311 3,561,611 2,830,707 2,140,86749MarketAssessmentIssue1:CFLKsSoldwithCFsDOEassumesthatthemajorityofCFLKsaresoldwithCFsanddidnotanalyzeCFLKssoldseparatelyinitsanalysis.DOErequestscommentonthisassumptionandavailableshipmentsdataonCFLKssoldseparately.Issue8:CFLKsforHigh‐VolumeCFsDOEseeksanswerstothefollowingquestionsrelatedtoCFLKsdesignedforhigh‐volumefans:•DomanufacturersanticipatethatCFLKsdesignedforhigh‐volumefanswillconstituteasignificantfractionoftheCFLKmarketinthenext5to10years?•Whatrangeoflumenoutputsare/wouldtheseproductsbedesignedtoachieve?•WouldtheseCFLKsbelikelytohaveanyotheruniquecharacteristicsthatarenotcommontothecurrentmarketofCFLKs?50ConsideredProductClasses•PursuanttoEPCA,DOEestablishesdifferentproductclassesby:(1)typeofenergyused;(2)capacityoftheproduct;or(3)anyotherperformance‐relatedfeaturesthatrequiredifferentstandardlevels,suchasfeaturesaffectingconsumerutility.(42U.S.C.6295(q))•DOEisconsideringredefiningCFLKsfromthecurrentthreeproductclassesintotwoproductsclasses.•Newproductclassstructureessentiallycombinesthecurrentproductclasses1and3intothenewproductclass2.CurrentProductClassDescription1 Mediumscrew base(E26)2Pin‐basedfluorescent(appliesonlytonon‐integrallyballastedlamps)3 AllotherCFLKsProposedProductClassDescription1CFLKswithexternally‐ballastedordrivenlamps2 AllotherCFLKs51ProductClassesIssue7:CFLKProductClassesDOEisconsideringanewproductclassstructurethatdividesCFLKsintotwoproductclasses:Externally‐Ballasted/DrivenCFLKsandAllOtherCFLKs.DOEinvitescommentonthisstructure.Issue19:ProductionofExternally‐DrivenLEDCFLKsDOErequestscommentonwhethermanufacturersarecurrentlyproducingorexpectingtoproduceCFLKsthatuseexternally‐drivenLEDlamps.Issue4:DimmingDOEseeksdataonthedimmingfunctionalityofcurrentgenerationCFLandLEDlamps,andspecificallyontheperformanceofthoselampswithdimmersdesignedfortheircontrol.DOEseeksdataonconsumersatisfactionwiththedimmingfunctionalityofthesesystems.DOEalsoseeksinputfrommanufacturersastowhethertheyanticipateaccommodatingdimmingfunctionalityintotheLEDCFLKmodelstheywillofferforsaleinthenextfiveyears,andifso,whatfractionofLEDCFLKswouldincludesuchfunctionality.52TechnologyOptions•DOEisconsideringmoreefficaciouslightsourcesastheonlytechnologyoptiontoincreaseCFLKefficacy.•DOEisnotconsideringexternalballastsorlightingcontrols,astheimpactofthesetechnologiescannotbemeasuredbytheproposedCFLKtestprocedures.Issue5:LightingControlsDOErequestscommentonitsproposalnottoincludelightingcontrolsasatechnologyoptioninthisrulemaking.Issue6:CFLKTechnologyOptionsDOErequestscommentonlampsbeingconsideredasthetechnologyoptionsforCFLKsandanyadditionaloptionsthatshouldbeincluded.53CFLKECSPre‐AnalysisPresentationOverviewScreening Analysis3Product Price Determination5Scope of Coverage1Energy Use6Market & Technology2Closing Remarks11Engineering Analysis4Life-Cycle Cost Analysis7Shipments; National Impact Analysis8Preliminary MIA9NOPR Analyses1054•DOErevieweddifferenttechnologyoptionsandassessedthemusingthefollowingcriteria:–Technologicalfeasibility–Practicabilitytomanufacture,install,andservice–Adverseimpactsonproductutilityoravailabilitytocustomers–Adverseimpactsonhealthorsafety•DOEdidnotscreenoutanytechnologyoptionsandthereforeconsideredmoreefficaciouslightsourcesasdesignoptionsintheengineeringanalysis.ScreeningAnalysisIssue 10: Screening AnalysisDOE invites comment on the screening analysis.55CFLKECSPre‐AnalysisPresentationOverviewScreening Analysis3Product Price Determination5Scope of Coverage1Energy Use6Market & Technology2Closing Remarks11Engineering Analysis4Life-Cycle Cost Analysis7Shipments; National Impact Analysis8Preliminary MIA9NOPR Analyses1056Selectcertainproductclassestobeanalyzedintheengineeringanalysis.EngineeringAnalysisMethodologyDefinecharacteristicsofmodelsineachproductclassthatserveasreferencepointstoassesschangesduetoenergyconservationstandards.Identifymoreefficacioussubstitutesforeachbaselinemodelbasedondesignoptions.Developcandidatestandardlevels(CSLs)thatspantherangeofefficacyfromthebaselinetothemaximumtechnologicallyfeasible.Scaleresultstoproductclassesnotanalyzed.SelectRepresentativeProduct ClassesSelect BaselineLampsIdentify MoreEfficaciousSubstitutesDetermine CSLsScale Results57RepresentativeProductClassesIssue11:RepresentativeProductClassesDOErequestscommentontherepresentativeproductclassesforCFLKs.•DOEchoosesrepresentativeproductclassestoconcentrateitsanalyticaleffort.–Representativeproductclasseswereselectedbasedonhighmarketvolumeoruniqueperformancecharacteristics.SelectRepresentativeProduct ClassesSelect BaselineLampsIdentify MoreEfficaciousSubstitutesDetermine CSLsScale ResultsProduct ClassAllOtherCFLKsCFLKswithExternally‐Ballasted/DrivenLamps58•Thebaselinemodeltypicallyrepresentsthemostcommon,leastefficaciouslampinaCFLKthatmeetsexistingenergyconservationstandards.DOEidentifiesabaselinemodelineachrepresentativeproductclass.BaselineLampsSelectRepresentativeProduct ClassesSelect BaselineLampsIdentify MoreEfficaciousSubstitutesDetermine CSLsScale Results59•Foreachbaselinelamp,DOEselectedmoreefficaciousreplacementlamps,onthebasisofinitialefficacy,tomeasurepotentialenergy‐savingimprovements.DOEselectedmoreefficacioussubstitutesunderalampreplacementscenarioandafixturereplacementscenario.–Inthelampreplacementscenario,themoreefficacioussubstitutewiththesamebasetypeasthebaselinelampwasselected.–Inthefixturereplacementscenario,themoreefficaciouslampsubstitutewithadifferentbasetypethanthebaselinelampcouldbeselectedandachangeinnumberoffixturesocketswasallowed.–Boththelampandfixturereplacementscenariousethesamebaselinelamp.MoreEfficaciousSubstitutes:SubstitutionScenariosSelectRepresentativeProduct ClassesSelect BaselineLampsIdentify MoreEfficaciousSubstitutesDetermine CSLsScale ResultsIssue13:SubstitutionScenariosDOErequestscommentonthelikelihoodofCFLKmanufacturersselectingeachsubstitutionscenarioandinformationonanyalternativescenariosthatmanufacturersmaychoose.60CandidateStandardLevels•DOEconsideredanequation‐basedapproachtocharacterizeacontinuousrelationshipbetweenlampinputpowerandinitiallampefficacy.•DOEusedcommerciallyavailablelampsandtheirassociatedcatalogratedefficaciestodetermineCSLs.SelectRepresentativeProduct ClassesSelect BaselineLampsIdentify MoreEfficaciousSubstitutesDetermine CSLsScale Results61•FortheAllOtherCFLKproductclassDOEidentifiedabaselinelampthatrepresentsthemostcommon,leastefficaciouslampinaCFLKthatmeetsexistingenergyconservationstandards.AllOtherCFLKs:BaselineLampSelectRepresentativeProduct ClassesSelect BaselineLampsIdentify MoreEfficaciousSubstitutesDetermine CSLsScale ResultsBulbShapeBaseTypeLampTypeLampWattageInitialLightOutputEfficacyLampLifetimeNumberofSockets*W lm lm/W hrSpiral E26 CFL 14 730 52.1 10,000 2*UsedinfixturereplacementscenarioIssue12:BaselineLampDOErequestscommentonthebaselineunitselectedforAllOtherCFLKs.62EfficacyLevelLampTypeBaseTypeBulbShapeWattageInitialLightOutputEfficacyCRICCTLampLifetimeW lm lm/W K hrBaseline CFL E26 Spiral 14 730 52.1 82 2,700 10,000CSL1 CFL E26 Spiral 13 800 61.5 82 2,700 12,000CSL2 CFL E26 Spiral 11 730 66.4 82 2,700 10,000CSL3 LED E26 A19 10 700 70.0 75 3,000 50,000CSL4 LED E26/E27 A19 9 680 75.6 80 3,000 50,000CSL5 LED E26 G25 8 680 85.0 75 2,700 50,000AllOtherCFLKs–LampReplacementScenario:MoreEfficaciousSubstitutes63AllOtherCFLKs–FixtureReplacementScenario:MoreEfficaciousSubstitutesEfficacyLevelLampTypeBaseTypeBulbShapeFixtureSocketsLampWattageFixtureWattageLampInitialLightOutputFixtureInitialLightOutputEfficacyCRICCTLampLifeW W lm lm lm/W K hrBaseline CFL E26 Spiral 2 14 28 730 1,460 52.1 82 2,700 10,000CSL1 CFL E26 Spiral 1 23 23 1,500 1,500 65.2 82 2,700 10,000CSL2 CFL E26 Spiral 3 7 21 450 1,350 64.3 82 2,700 12,000CSL3 LED E26 A19 4 5 20 340 1,360 68.0 75 2,700 50,000CSL4 LED E26 A21 1 19 19 1,600 1,600 84.2 94 2,700 50,000CSL5 LED E26 A19 3 6 18 500 1,500 83.3 80 2,700 50,000Issue14:MoreEfficaciousSubstitutesDOErequestscommentonthecriteriausedinselectingmoreefficacioussubstitutelamps,aswellasthecharacteristicsoftheunitsselectedforAllOtherCFLKs.DOEparticularlyrequestscommentonthelifetimesofthebaselineandsubstitutelamps.64AllOtherCFLKs:CandidateStandardLevels•DOEconsideredanequation‐basedapproachtocharacterizeacontinuousrelationshipbetweenlampinputpowerandinitiallampefficacy.•ThefollowingareCSLsunderconsideration:SelectRepresentativeProduct ClassesSelect BaselineLampsIdentify MoreEfficaciousSubstitutesDetermine CSLsScale ResultsCandidateStandardLevelEfficacyRequirementlm/WCSL1 73/(1+5*((W+10)‐1))CSL2 81/(1+5*((W+10)‐1))CSL3 87/(1+5*((W+10)‐1))CSL4 94/(1+5*((W+10)‐1))CSL5 108/(1+5*((W+10)‐1))W=ratedlampwattage65AllOtherCFLKs:CandidateStandardLevelsAllOtherCFLKs: LampandFixtureReplacementScenarios66AllOtherCFLKs:CandidateStandardLevelsIssue16:CandidateStandardLevelsDOErequestscommentontheCSLsunderconsideration,includingthemaxtechlevel,forAllOtherCFLKs.Inparticular,DOErequestscommentontheequationsusedtodefinetheefficacyrequirementsateachCSL.67Externally‐Ballasted/DrivenProductClass:Lamp‐and‐BallastSystems•ToassesstheperformanceofCFLKswithExternally‐BallastedorDrivenLamps,DOEusedasystemsapproachandpairedlampswithballasts,capturingreal‐worldenergyuseandlightoutput.•DOEpairedexternally‐ballastedlampswithelectronicballasts,astheyarerequiredbyexistingCFLKstandardsandrepresentthemostcommonballastsonthemarket.68Externally‐Ballasted/DrivenProductClass:BaselineLampBulbShapeBaseTypeLampTypeNominalWattageANSIRatedWattageSystemInputPowerLampInitialLightOutputSystemInitialLightOutputLampRatedEfficacySystemEfficacyLampLife‐timeNumberofSockets*W W W lm lm lm/W lm/W hrT9CircularG10qFluorescent22 22.5 17.0 950 855 42.2 50.3 12,000 1Issue12:BaselineLampDOErequestscommentonthebaselineunitselectedforCFLKswithExternally‐BallastedorDrivenLamps.*Usedinfixturereplacementscenario•FortheExternally‐Ballasted/Drivenproductclass,DOEidentifiedabaselinelampthatrepresentsthemostcommon,leastefficaciouslampinaCFLK.•Baselineproductsinthisclassaresubjecttosystemefficacystandards.•DOEpairedthebaselinelampwithaballastresultinginasystemefficacythatjustmeetsstandards.69Externally‐Ballasted/DrivenProductClass:MoreEfficaciousSubstitutesEfficacyLevelLampTypeLampDiameterNominalWattageRatedWattageSystemInputPowerLampInitialLightOutputSystemInitialLightOutputLampLifetimeBallastFactorLampRatedEfficacySystemEfficacyW W W lm lm hr lm/W lm/WBaseline Fluorescent T9 22 22.5 17.0 950 855 12,000 0.9 42.2 50.3CSL1 Fluorescent T9 20 19 14.3 920 828 12,000 0.9 48.4 57.9EfficacyLevelLampTypeLampDiameterFixtureSocketsLampWattageFixtureWattageSystemInputPowerLampInitialLightOutputSystemInitialLightOutputLampLifetimeStartingMethodBallastFactorLampRatedEfficacySystemEfficacyW W W lm lm hr lm/W lm/WBaselineFluor‐escentT9 1 22 22.5 17.0 950 855 12,000 RS 0.9 42.2 50.3CSL1 CFL‐1 13 13 16.0 900 900 17,000 PS 1.0 69.2 56.3LampReplacementScenarioFixtureReplacementScenario70Externally‐Ballasted/DrivenProductClass:MoreEfficaciousSubstitutesIssue13:MoreEfficaciousSubstitutesDOErequestscommentonthecriteriausedinselectingmoreefficacioussubstitutelamps,aswellastheunitsselectedforExternally‐Ballasted/DrivenCFLKs.DOEparticularlyrequestscommentonthelifetimesofthebaselineandsubstitutelamps.Issue15:Lamp‐and‐BallastSystemsDOErequestscommentonthelamp‐and‐ballastsystemsselectedfortheExternally‐Ballasted/DrivenCFLKsproductclass.Inparticular,DOErequestscommentontheselectionofelectronicballastsforthelamp‐and‐ballastsystems.71Externally‐Ballasted/DrivenProductClass:CandidateStandardLevels•DOEconsideredanequation‐basedapproachtocharacterizeacontinuousrelationshipbetweenlampinputpowerandinitiallampefficacy.•ThefollowingCSLisunderconsideration:SelectRepresentativeProduct ClassesSelect BaselineLampsIdentify MoreEfficaciousSubstitutesDetermine CSLsScale ResultsCandidateStandardLevelEfficacyRequirementlm/WCSL1 62/(1+9*((W+12)‐1))W=ratedlampwattage72Externally‐Ballasted/DrivenProductClass:CandidateStandardLevelsCFLKswithExternally‐Ballasted orDrivenLamps73Externally‐Ballasted/DrivenProductClass:CandidateStandardLevelsIssue16:CandidateStandardLevelsDOErequestscommentontheCSLsunderconsideration,includingthemaxtechlevel,forExternally‐Ballasted/DrivenCFLKs.Inparticular,DOErequestscommentontheequationsusedtodefinetheefficacyrequirementsateachCSL.74ScalingBetweenProductClasses•Ingeneral,DOEscalesCSLstoproductclassesnotdirectlyanalyzed.•BecauseDOEchosetoanalyzeallproductclassesasrepresentativenoscalingwasrequired.SelectRepresentativeProduct ClassesSelect BaselineLampsIdentify MoreEfficaciousSubstitutesDetermine CSLsScale Results75EngineeringAnalysisIssue17:BallastReplacementsDOErequestscommentonwhether,andwhatfractionof,ballastsforpin‐basedfluorescentlampsaredesignedtobereplaceablebytheconsumer.DOEalsorequestscommentonwhetherconsumersgenerallyreplacetheballastinaCFLKwithaconsumer‐replaceableballastifitfails,orifconsumersreplacetheentireCFLK,assumingitisnolongeroperable.Issue20:Externally‐DrivenLEDReplacementsDOErequestscommentonthepracticalityofexternally‐drivenLEDs(e.g.,LEDmodule‐and‐driversystems)asreplacementsforexternally‐ballastedfluorescentorCFLlampsinCFLKs.Specifically,DOErequestsinformationonthefixturechangesnecessaryforsuchareplacement.Issue21:Externally‐DrivenLEDEfficaciesDOErequestsinformationonthetypicalefficacyrangesforexternally‐drivenLEDsusedinCFLKs.DOErequestsinformationonwhattheseefficacyrangesrepresent(i.e.,luminaireefficacyofthefixture,LEDmodulealone,orLEDmodule‐and‐driversystem).76EngineeringAnalysisIssue22:EngineeringAnalysisDOErequestscommentsontheoverallmethodologyandresultsoftheCFLKengineeringanalysis.77CFLKECSPre‐AnalysisPresentationOverviewScreening Analysis3Product Price Determination5Scope of Coverage1Energy Use6Market & Technology2Closing Remarks11Engineering Analysis4Life-Cycle Cost Analysis7Shipments; National Impact Analysis8Preliminary MIA9NOPR Analyses1078•TheefficiencyoftheCFLKisbasedontheefficacyofthelampswithwhichitispackaged.•Therefore,DOEfirstdevelopedtheconsumerpriceoftheCFLKandthendeterminedthepartofthatpriceattributabletothelampcomponent.ProductPriceDetermination79ConsumerpriceofCFLK•DOEidentifiedelectrical/specialty(lowprices);homecenters(mediumprices);andlightingshowrooms(highprices)asthethreemainCFLKdistributionchannels.•DOEcollectedmanufacturersuggesteddistributornetprice(DNP)datatocalculateanaveragepremiumcorrespondingtotheconsumerpriceofCFLKsforeachdistributionchannel.•Basedonshipmentestimatesthrougheachchannel,DOEapplied12%totheelectrical/specialtyprice,80%tothehomecenterchannelprice,and8%tothelightingshowroomchannelpricetodevelopaweightedaverageCFLKconsumerprice.ProductPriceDetermination80ConsumerpriceofCFLKattributabletolamp•Basedonmanufacturerfeedback,DOEdeterminedthatforaCFLKwithaCFLorLED,thelampcomponentcomprisesanestimated15%oftheCFLKconsumerprice.•DOEappliedthispercentagetotheweightedaverageCFLKconsumerpricetoobtaintheweightedaverageconsumerpriceofthelamppackagedwiththeCFLK.•IncaseswhereDOEwasunabletodevelopaconsumerpriceforaCFLKwitharepresentativelamp,DOEappliedaratiobasedontheexpectedincrementalcostoftherepresentativelamprelativetothebaselinelamp.ProductPriceDetermination81Issue24:CFLKandLampPricePercentagesDOErequestscommentonitsdeterminationthatabasicCFLKpackagedwithaceilingfancomprises20percentoftheconsumerpriceofaceilingfanandlightkit.DOEalsorequestscommentonitsdeterminationthataCFLorLEDpackagedwithaCFLKcomprise15percentoftheconsumerpriceoftheCFLK.Issue25:ConsumerPriceDistributionChannelWeightingDOErequestscommentonthevaluesofthepercentagesofshipmentsthatgothrougheachofthesedistributionchannels(electricalspecialty,homecenter,andlightingshowroom).Issue27:BallastPricesDOErequestscommentonitsassumptionthatthepricesofthedifferentelectronicballastspresentedinthefixturereplacementscenarioareequaltoeachotherfortheExternally‐Ballasted/DrivenCFLKsproductclass.Issue26:ProductPriceDeterminationDOEinvitescommentonitsmethodologyandresultsforestimatingconsumerpricesforlampspackagedwithCFLKs.ProductPriceDetermination82CFLKECSPre‐AnalysisPresentationOverviewScreening Analysis3Product Price Determination5Scope of Coverage1Energy Use6Market & Technology2Closing Remarks11Engineering Analysis4Life-Cycle Cost Analysis7Shipments; National Impact Analysis8Preliminary MIA9NOPR Analyses1083EnergyUseCharacterization•Purpose:•Developannualenergyuseestimatesforeachefficiencylevel.•Methodology:•Annualenergyuse(kWh)=annualoperatinghoursxsysteminputpower•AnnualOperatingHours:•ResidentialSector:DOEcombineddataontheroomswhereCFLKsarelocated(fromLBNLstudy)withdataonoperatinghoursforresidentialceilinglightfixturesbyroomtype(fromDOE’s2012ResidentialLightingEnd‐UseConsumptionSurvey(RLEUCS)).•CommercialSector:DOEuseddataonoperatinghoursforlightsourcetechnologiestypicallyusedinCFLKsfor14commercialbuildingtypesfromthe2010U.S.LightingMarketCharacterization(LMC).SectorNationalWeightedAverageDailyOperatingHours(hrs/day)Commercial 10.6Residential 1.484EnergyUseCharacterization•SystemInputPower:DOEutilizedthepowerconsumptiondatapresentedintheengineeringanalysisforrepresentativelampsandlamp‐and‐ballastsystemstodevelopsysteminputpower.•AllOtherCFLKs:•DOEdevelopeditsestimateoftheinputpowerofCFLKstoaccountforthetypicallumenoutputofCFLKsinthemarket.•ToestimatetheaveragelumenoutputofAllOtherCFLKs,DOEused:(1)In‐storeshelfsurveydataofCFswithlightkitsandCFLKssoldalone(sockettypes,socketnumbers,lightsourcetechnologies,lampwattages,retailprices);and(2)lampefficacydatafromonlineretailersontheefficacyoflampsfoundinAllOtherCFLKs.•CFLKswithExternallyBallastedorDrivenLamps:•DOEdidnotscaletheirlightoutput.85EnergyUseCharacterizationLampEfficacies BaseTypeMarketShare(2012)WeightedAverageCFLKTotalLumensBelowrestructuredbaselineCandelabra 79% 1,663AboverestructuredbaselineE26(MSB) 15%1,960GU24 5%VaryAllOther 1% (excluded)Total 100%86EnergyUseCharacterizationResults•CFLKswithExternallyBallastedorDrivenLamps:•AllOtherCFLKs:CSLResidential CommercialEnergyUse(kWh/yr)Savings(kWh/yr)EnergyUse(kWh/yr)Savings(kWh/yr)08.6‐66‐17.7 0.9 59 7.2CSLResidential CommercialEnergyUse(kWh/yr)Savings(kWh/yr)EnergyUse(kWh/yr)Savings(kWh/yr)019.0‐145‐116.7 2.4 127 18214.6 4.4 112 34313.6 5.4 104 42412.6 6.5 96 49511.6 7.5 88 57Energy use andsavings for eachCSL are averagevalues of the twoengineeringscenarios for eachCSL(DOE assumedequal marketshares for the twoscenarios).87EnergyUseCharacterizationIssue23:LumenOutputofPin‐BasedFluorescentCFLKsToimproveitsenergyuseestimates,DOEseekscommentonthetypicaltotallumenoutputsofpin‐basedfluorescentCFLKs.88CFLKECSPre‐AnalysisPresentationOverviewScreening Analysis3Product Price Determination5Scope of Coverage1Energy Use6Market & Technology2Closing Remarks11Engineering Analysis4Life-Cycle Cost Analysis7Shipments; National Impact Analysis8Preliminary MIA9NOPR Analyses1089Life‐CycleCost(LCC)andPaybackPeriod(PBP)•Purpose•Provideaneconomicevaluationfromtheend‐user’sperspective.•Life‐CycleCost(LCC)isthetotalpurchasercostoverthelifeofaproduct.•PaybackPeriod(PBP)isthetimerequiredtorecovertheincreasedpurchasepriceofmoreenergy‐efficientproductsthroughreducedoperatingcosts.•Method•DevelopMonteCarlosampleof10,000purchasers•DeterminetotalinstalledcostsforeachCSL.•Determineoperatingcostsforfirstyearandlifetimeofproduct,including:lampdisposalcosts,lampreplacementsthroughoutthelifetimeofaCFLK,andtheresidualvalueoflampsattheendoftheCFLKlifetime•CalculatePBPbydividingaverageincreaseininstalledcostbyaveragedecreaseinfirst‐yearoperatingcost.•CalculateLCCbyaddinginstalledcostandlifetimeoperatingcosts.•CalculateLCCsavingsbysubtractingLCCofeachCSLfromLCCoftheCSLintheabsenceofstandards.90PurchaserSamples•Toaccountforvariabilityinenergyconsumption,energyprice,orboth,DOEdevelopedasampleof10,000CFLKpurchasers.•Residentialsector:•RandomlyselectedhouseholdsfromthesubsetofhouseswithCFsinRECS2009.•DOEappliedaselectionweighttoeachhouseholdbasedonnumberofCFsineachhousehold•Commercialsector:•Randomlyselectedbuildingsfromthe2003CommercialBuildingsEnergyConsumptionSurvey(CBECS)— excludingvacantbuildings.•DOEappliedaselectionweighttoeachbuildingbasedonsquarefootage,numberoflampsper1000ft2,andfractionoflampsusinglightsourcetechnologiesfoundinCFLKsLCCandPBP91LCCandPBPMarketEfficiencyDistributionbyCSL•ExpectedmarketsharebyCSLofCFLKsthatconsumerswouldpurchaseinthecomplianceyearintheabsenceofamendedstandards.•AllOtherCFLKs:DOEusedLEDincursionincombinationwithaconsumer‐choicemodeltoprojectthemarketdistributionofshipmentsfrom2012to2019.*•ExternallyBallasted/DrivenCFLKs:Duetoinsufficientmarketdata,DOEassumedanevensplitinmarketsharebetweenCSL0andCSL1.*LEDincursion,andtheconsumerchoicemodelwillbediscussedindetailintheShipmentsAnalysissection92LCCandPBPMarketEfficiencyDistributioninComplianceYear(2019)•PercentageofsalesateachCSLintheabsenceofamendedstandardsCSL Scenario*MarketShare(%)CSL050CSL1LampReplacement50CSL1FixtureReplacementTotal100CSL Scenario*MarketShare(%)BelowCSL058.2CSL00.0CSL1LampReplacement11.3FixtureReplacementCSL2LampReplacement3.8FixtureReplacementCSL3LampReplacement0.0FixtureReplacementCSL 4LampReplacement0.2FixtureReplacementCSL5LampReplacement26.5FixtureReplacementTotal100Externally Ballasted/Driven All Other CFLKs*DOE assumed equal marketshares for each engineering scenario93LCCandPBPTotalInstalledCost•TotalInstalledCost=ProductPrice+SalesTax•ProductPricebasedonoutputofproductpricedetermination•Includestheend‐userlampandsocketpricesforeachCFLK(numberoflamps/socketsscaledbythesamefactorastotallumenoutput).•AlsoincludespricelearningforLEDsexpectedtooccurbycompliancedate(moredetailprovidedintheshipmentssection).•SalesTax(includingstateandlocalsalestax)isdeterminedbygeographiclocation•InstallationcostnotincludedbecauseitwasassumednottovarywithCSL.94LCCandPBPOperatingHours•TocapturevariabilityinCFLKHOUforindividualpurchases,DOEappliedatriangulardistributiontotheaverageHOU.•HOUdistributionforeachsamplehadaminimumof80%andamaximumof120%ofthecorrespondingweightedaverageHOUvalue.ElectricityPrices•ElectricitypricesandtrendsareestimatedusingdatafromEIA.•DOEusedEIA’sAnnualEnergyOutlook(AEO)forprojectionsoffutureaverageenergyprices(reference,high‐,andlow‐growthscenarios).95LCCandPBP•Usedtodiscountoperatingcoststoyearofpurchase(i.e.2019).•RepresentstheopportunitycostoffundsusedtopurchaseCFLKs.•Intheresidentialsector:•ForreplacementCFLKsinexistinghomes:•Usedadistributionofdebtandassetclassesforpurchasingappliances.•e.g.,stocks,mutualfunds,savingsaccounts,bonds,loans•ForCFLKsinstalledinnewconstruction:•Usedadistributionofmortgagerates.•Inthecommercialsector:•Usedadistributionofweightedaveragecostofcapital.DiscountRates96LCCandPBPLifetime•LifetimeistheageatwhichtheCFLKisretiredfromservice.•DOEusedCFlifetimeasaproxyforCFLKlifetime.MaintenanceandRepairCosts•DOEconsiderslampreplacementcostsforfailedlampstobetheonlyrepairandmaintenancecostthatvarieswithproductefficiency.97LCCandPBPLampReplacements•DOEincludedintheLCCthecosttoreplacelampsthatfailduringthelifetimeoftheCFLK.•Lampreplacementcostsarethepurchasecostsofreplacementlampsintheyearthefailedlampsarereplaced,discountedtotheanalysisstartyear.•DOEassumesthatCFLKlampsfailattheendoftheiraverageservicelife(lamplifetimedividedbythelamp’soperatinghoursperyear).•Replacementlamps:•Havethesamebasetypeasfailedlamps•Provideanequivalentlumenoutputasfailedlamps•PricesdonotincludetheCFLKmanufacturermarkup98LCCandPBPLampReplacements:ExternallyBallasted/DrivenCFLKs•DOEassumedthatfailedCFLKlampsarereplacedwiththesamelampthatwasoriginallypackagedwiththelightkit.99LCCandPBPLampReplacements:AllOtherCFLKs•Lampreplacementoptionsforlow,medium,andhighefficacylamps.•DOEusedtheengineeringdataformediumandhighefficacylampreplacementsandmarketresearchdataforlowefficacylampreplacements•Datausedwereefficacies,watts,prices(pricelearningappliedtoLEDs),andlifetimesforeachlampreplacement.•LEDincursionintothemarketforreplacementslampswasbasedonDOESSLreport.Fractionoflowversusmediumefficacylampswasdeterminedbyaconsumer‐choicemodelsensitivetopriceandoperatingcost100LCCandPBPDisposalCost•Disposalcostrepresentsthecostofdisposing(e.g.,recycling)lampsattheendofthelamplifetime.•DOEfoundthat,onaverage,disposingofaCFLcostsabout$1perlamp.•LEDdisposalcostsassumedtobethesameasforCFLs.•Residentialsector:–DOEassumedthatconsumersdonotpayrecyclingcosts.•Commercialsector:–DOEassumedthatconsumerspayrecyclingcostsfor10%ofCFLandLEDlampfailures (averagecostof$0.1appliedtoall)101LCCandPBPResidualValue•Lampresidualvalueistheremainingvalueofthesurvivinglamp(s)attheendoftheCFLKlifetime.–Residualvalueisappliedasa“credit”totheLCC.•DOEcalculatestheresidualvalueforlampsbasedonthelamppriceintheyeartheCFLKisretired,discountedtotheanalysisstartyear.102LCCandPBPExternallyBallasted/DrivenCFLKsResultsCSLAverageCosts(2013$)SimplePayback(years)AverageLifetime(years)AverageSavings(2013$)InstalledCostFirstYear’sOperatingCostLifetimeOperatingCostLCCResidentialSector0$8.6 $1.1 $10$19‐‐13.8$0.01$13 $1.0 $7.7$2033.713.8‐$0.8CommercialSector0$8.6 $7.7 $81$90‐‐13.8$0.01$13 $6.8 $76$884.913.8$0.7103LCCandPBPResults:AllOtherCFLKsCSLAverageCosts(2013$)SimplePayback(years)AverageLifetime(years)AverageSavings(2013$)InstalledCostFirstYear’sOperatingCostLifetimeOperatingCostLCCResidentialSector0$10.8 $2.4 $23.8$34.60.513.8$30.71$10.9 $2.1 $20.5$31.40.513.8$32.52$11.7 $1.9 $17.8$29.50.613.8$33.93$24.2 $1.7 $14.2$38.41.813.8$27.34$26.1 $1.6 $11.9$38.02.013.8$27.65$27.5 $1.5 $9.90$37.42.113.8$28.1CommercialSector0$10.8 $16.9 $122$1330.113.8$1431$10.9 $14.8 $116$1270.113.8$1472$11.7 $13.0 $109$1200.113.8$1513$24.2 $12.1 $113$1380.313.8$1394$26.1 $11.2 $104$1300.313.8$1445$27.4 $10.3 $96.0$1230.313.8$149Note:CSL0representsthebaselinethatDOEisconsideringfortheredefinedproductclasses.104LCCandPBPIssue3: CFLKLifetimeForthispreliminaryanalysis,DOEassumesthatthelifetimeofCFLKsisequaltothelifetimeoftheCF.DOEinvitescomment,input,anddataonthelifetimeofCFLKs.Issue18:InseparableSSLsDOErequestscommentonwhetherandwhichcomponentsinCFLKswithsolid‐statelightingcomponentsthatareinseparablefromtheCFLKaredesignedtobereplaceablebytheconsumer.Specifically,DOErequestsinformationonwhichSSLcomponentsmaybeeasilyremovableandreplaceablebyconsumers,andhowsuchreplacementswouldbeperformed.105LCCandPBPIssue28:CFLKInstallationCostsDOEwelcomescommentonitsapproachofnotincludinginstallationcostsintheLCCanalysis.Issue29:CFLKDisposalCostsDOErequestscommentandrelevantdataonthedisposalcostassumptionsforthedifferentlightsourcetechnologiesusedinCFLKs.Issue32:MarketDistributionofCFLKsbyCSLandProductClassDOErequestscommentontheoverallmethodologyandassumptions,aswellasrelevantdata,onthemarketdistributionofCFLKsbyCSLforeachproductclass.106CFLKECSPre‐AnalysisPresentationOverviewScreening Analysis3Product Price Determination5Scope of Coverage1Energy Use6Market & Technology2Closing Remarks11Engineering Analysis4Life-Cycle Cost Analysis7Shipments; National Impact Analysis8Preliminary MIA9NOPR Analyses10107•Purpose–Quantifychangesovertimeinproductshipmentsduetopotentialamendedenergyefficiencystandardsoveranalysisperiod(2019‐2048)–EstimatethedisaggregationofshipmentsintoproductclassesandCSLsovertime•Method–TotalCFLKshipmentsestimatedusingastock‐accountingmethodologycalibratedtohistoricalshipmentsdata–Modelaccountsforproductreplacements,newconstruction,andnewinstallationsintoexistingbuildings–ShipmentsdisaggregatedbyCSLusingamodifiedconsumer‐choicemodelShipmentsAnalysis:Overview108ShipmentsAnalysisInput DataDescription/SourceReplacementsHistorical shipmentsfromApplianceMagazine,NPD,andEnergyStar.Retirementfunctionfromlifetime.New ConstructionAnnual EnergyOutlook2014,penetrationfromRECS2009ExistingBuildings EstimateofincreasingpenetrationfromRECSMarketShare Modelcountsfromin‐storevisitsand onlineretailers109ShipmentsAnalysis:SchematicReplacementsNewConstructionNewInstallationsRetirementFunctionHistoricalShipmentsAEOProjectionRECS2009TotalShipmentsShipmentsbyProductClassandCSLConsumer‐ChoiceModel110•DOEassumed88%oflow‐volumeCFshipmentswerepackagedandsoldwithCFLKsbasedonanalysisofmarketdata•DOEassumedCFLKswerenotpurchasedwithhigh‐volumeCFs•Marketsharebyproductclassfor2012basedonin‐storeshelfsurveys–Externally‐Ballasted/Driven:0.5%–AllOtherCFLKs:99.5%•LEDpenetrationestimatedwithanincursioncurveShipmentsAnalysis:Inputs&AssumptionsIssue36:SectorBreakdownofCFLKUsageDOErequestscommentsonitsassumedbreakdownofCFLKusageas95%intheresidentialsectorand5%commercialsector.111•PricelearningappliedtoCFLKsthatusesolid‐statelighting.ShipmentsAnalysis:PriceLearningIssue30:CFLKPriceLearningDOErequestscommentontheassumptionthatonlyLEDswillcontinuetoundergosignificantcostreductionduetopricelearning.112•MarketsharesforLEDCFLKsmodelledasaBassdiffusioncurve.ShipmentsAnalysis:LEDincursion113ShipmentsAnalysisIssue33:CFLKDistributionsbyTechnologyandSectorDOEassumedthatthedistributionofCFLKsbylightsourcetechnologyinthecommercialsectoristhesameasthelightsourcetechnologydistributionintheresidentialsector.DOErequestscommentandinputregardingthisassumption.Issue34:LEDPenetrationintoCFLKMarketDOEestimatedthemarketpenetrationofLEDsintotheCFLKmarketasaBassdiffusioncurve.DOErequestscommentonthisapproach.114•CFLKconsumer‐choicemodel:1. MarketsharefirstappropriatedtoLEDbyincursioncurve2. RemainingmarketsharesplitbetweenotherCSLsassumingmanufacturerswillchoosethelowestfirstcostlampoptionforagivensockettypeandlamptechnology.3. MarketshareforagivenCSLisassumedtobedividedevenlybetweenlamp‐replacementandfixture‐replacementscenarios.•Instandardscase,optionsthatdonotmeetstandardareeliminatedandprobabilitiesrecalculatedShipmentsAnalysis:Consumer‐ChoiceModel115•DOEusesarelativepriceelasticitytoestimatedecreaseinshipmentsduetoapriceincreaseduetoimplementationofastandard•Sincelow‐volumeCFsandCFLKsareusuallypackagedtogether,DOEalsoconsideredtheimpactofaCFstandardonCFLKshipmentsinitsbasecaseCFLKshipmentsscenarioShipmentsAnalysis:ImpactofStandards116ShipmentsAnalysis:ResultsExternallyBallasted/DrivenAll OtherCFLKs117•Purpose‒Determinetheprojectednationalenergysavingsandconsumernationalnetpresentvalueofapotentialstandard.•Method‒Developannualseriesofnationalenergyandeconomicimpacts.‒UsetheshipmentsmodeltoestimatethetotalstockofCFLKsinserviceeachyear.‒Aggregatethecostsandenergyuseperunitinanygivenyear.‒ReportestimatesforeconomicimpactaschangeinconsumerNationalNetPresentValue(NPV)(inconstantyeardollars).‒Accountforthetime‐valueofmoneythroughdefineddiscountrates.NationalImpactAnalysis:Overview118NationalImpact Analysis:NIAProcessShipmentsAnalysisLife‐CycleCostAnalysisNationalEnergySavings(Quads)NationalNetPresentValue(Billions2013$)NationalEnergySavingsNationalEconomicImpacts•NESandNPVarecalculatedforproductsshippedfrom2019‐2048(includingenergysavingsrealizedinlateryearsbythoseproducts).InputsNIAprocessOutputs119NationalImpactAnalysisInputsInput DescriptionTotalInstalledCostPer‐unit annualweighted‐average valuesasafunctionofCSLtakenfromtheLCCanalysis.RepairandMaintenanceCostsRelampingaccountedforovercourseofCFLKlifetimedependingonlifetimeoflamppackagedwithCFLK.AnnualEnergyUsePer‐unitannualweighted‐averagevaluesasafunctionofCSLtakenfromenergyuseanalysis.Base‐CaseEfficienciesShipments‐weightedefficienciesdeterminedforthecompliance yearfromtheconsumer‐choice modelinthebasecase.Standards‐CaseForecastedEfficienciesShipments‐weightedefficienciesdeterminedforthecomplianceyearfromtheconsumer‐choicemodelforeachpotentialstandardscase.EnergyPricesAveragenationalforecastedenergypricesfromEIAAEO2014 forecasts(to2040)andextrapolationto2048.Full‐FuelCycle Multiplierfortheprimaryfuel (electricity)usedbyCFLKs.DiscountRate 7 percentand3percentrealfromOMB’sRegulatoryAnalysisGuidelineA‐4.PresentYear Futureexpensesarediscountedtotheyear2014.NationalImpactAnalysis120NationalImpactAnalysisμ(y)RF(y))AEC(y)(AECNES(y)stdbaseWhere:NES(y)=Nationalenergysavingsinyeary(quads),AECbase(y)=basecaseannualnationalenergyconsumption,consideringthefull‐fuelcycle,forallproductclassescombinedinyeary(quads),AECstd(y)=standardscaseannualnationalenergyconsumption,consideringthefull‐fuelcycle,forallproductclassescombinedinyeary(quads),RF= reboundratefactor=1‐reboundrate,andμ(y)= full‐fuelcyclemultiplier•Nationalenergyprimaryenergysavingsiscalculatedusingthefollowingequation:121•Full‐fuelcycle(FFC)measureofenergyandgreenhousegasandotheremissionsisaccountedforinthisstandardsrulemaking.‒DOEhaspublishedaNoticeofPolicy(NOP)statingitsintentiontoincorporateFFCmetricsintothecost‐benefitanalysis.76FR51282(Aug.18,2011).•MethodologyisbasedonthecalculationofanFFCmultiplier,orconversionfactor,fortheelectricityusedbytheproduct.NationalImpactAnalysis:Full‐FuelCycle122NationalImpactAnalysisPVCPVSNPVWhere:NPV=Nationalnetpresentvalue(2013$)PVS=presentvaluesavingsinoperatingcost(includingcostsforenergy,repair, andmaintenancein2013$),andPVC=presentvalueofincreaseintotalinstalledcost(includingcostsforequipmentandinstallationin2013$)•NationalNetPresentValueiscalculatedusingthefollowingequation.NPVwascalculatedusing3%and7%discountrates:123NationalImpactAnalysis:LampReplacementLampReplacements•DOEincludedintheNIAthecosttoreplacelampsthatfailduringthelifetimeoftheCFLK.–Lampreplacementcostsarethepurchasecostsofreplacementlampsintheyearthefailedlampsarereplaced.–DOEassumesthatCFLKlampsfailattheendoftheiraverageservicelife(lamplifetimedividedbythelamp’soperatinghoursperyear).–Replacementlamps:•Havethesamebasetypeasfailedlamps•Provideanequivalentlumenoutputasfailedlamps•PricesdonotincludetheCFLKmanufacturermarkup–Consumer‐choicemodeltodeterminereplacementlamp.124NationalImpactAnalysis:ResidualValueResidualValue•Lampresidualvalueistheremainingvalueofthesurvivinglamp(s)attheendoftheCFLKlifetime.–Residualvalueisappliedasa“credit”totheNIA.•DOEcalculatestheresidualvalueforlampsbasedonthelamppriceintheyeartheCFLKisretired.125NationalImpactAnalysis:FFCNetEnergySavingsProductClassCSL 1 CSL2 CSL3 CSL4 CSL5Externally‐Ballasted/Driven0.0005AllOther0.286 0.330 0.394 0.394 0.394EnergySavings(quads)126ProductClass CSL 1 CSL2 CSL3 CSL4 CSL5Externally‐Ballasted/Driven(millions2013$)‐0.34AllOther(billions2013$)3.39 3.66 3.89 3.89 3.89NationalImpactAnalysis:NetPresentValueProductClass CSL 1 CSL2 CSL3 CSL4 CSL5Externally‐Ballasted/Driven(millions2013$)‐0.37AllOther(billions2013$)2.22 2.35 2.25 2.25 2.25NPVat7%discountrateNPVat3%discountrate127CFLKECSPre‐AnalysisPresentationOverviewScreening Analysis3Product Price Determination5Scope of Coverage1Energy Use6Market & Technology2Closing Remarks11Engineering Analysis4Life-Cycle Cost Analysis7Shipments; National Impact Analysis8Preliminary MIA9NOPR Analyses10128PreliminaryMIA•Purpose–Themanufacturerimpactanalysis(MIA)identifiestheimpactsofenergyconservationstandardsonmanufacturers.•Phase1–DOEcreatesanindustryprofiletocharacterizetheindustryandidentifyimportantissuesthatrequireconsideration.•Phase2–DOEpreparesanindustrycash‐flowmodelandaninterviewquestionnairetoguidesubsequentdiscussions.•Phase3–DOEinterviewsmanufacturersandassessestheimpactsofstandardsbothquantitatively(usingtheGovernmentRegulatoryImpactModel)andqualitatively(impactsoncompetition,manufacturingcapacity,directemployment,andregulatoryburden).129MIA:CeilingFanLightKitIssuesforCommentIssue40:ManufacturerImpactAnalysisDOErequestscommentonitsidentificationofkeyissuesandrequestsdataandinformationfrominterestedpartiesthatcanassistinevaluatingthepotentialimpactonCFLKmanufacturers.Issue38:RegulatoryFlexibilityActAnalysisDOEinvitesinterestedpartiestoprovideinformationregardinganysmallbusinessesthatmanufactureCFLKsandshouldbeconsultedbeforeDOEpublishesaNOPR.Issue39:ManufacturerSubgroupAnalysisDOErequestsfeedbackonsubgroupstoanalyzeand/orcharacteristicsappropriateforaseparatesubgroupanalysis.Issue41:ManufacturerMarkupDOErequestscommentonthemanufacturermarkupvalueof1.37usedinthepreliminaryanalysis.130CFLKECSPre‐AnalysisPresentationOverviewScreening Analysis3Product Price Determination5Scope of Coverage1Energy Use6Market & Technology2Closing Remarks11Engineering Analysis4Life-Cycle Cost Analysis7Shipments; National Impact Analysis8Preliminary MIA9NOPR Analyses10131Monetizationof EmissionReductionsBenefitsLife-CycleCostSubgroupAnalysisManufacturerImpactAnalysisUtilityImpactAnalysisEmploymentImpactAnalysisRegulatoryImpactAnalysisRevisePreliminaryAnalysisFrameworkDocumentPrelimAnalysisNOPRFinalRuleAnalysesforNoticeofProposedRulemaking(NOPR)EmissionsAnalysis132NOPRAnalyses•LCCSubgroupAnalysis–Effectsonvariousnationalconsumersubgroups•ManufacturerImpactAnalysis–ContinueworkbeguninthepreliminaryMIA•EmploymentImpactAnalysis–Indirecteffectsonnationalemployment•UtilityImpactAnalysis–Effectsongenerationcapacityofutilities•EmissionsAnalysis–Effectsonairbornepollutantemissions•MonetizationofEmissionReductionsBenefits–Monetarybenefitsfromemissionsreduction•RegulatoryImpactAnalysis–Potentialfornon‐regulatoryapproaches133CFLKECSPre‐AnalysisPresentationOverviewScreening Analysis3Product Price Determination5Scope of Coverage1Energy Use6Market & Technology2Closing Remarks11Engineering Analysis4Life-Cycle Cost Analysis7Shipments; National Impact Analysis8Preliminary MIA9NOPR Analyses10134ClosingRemarks/Questions135HowtoSubmitWrittenCommentsforCFLKs•Inallcorrespondence,pleaserefertotheCFLKrulemakingby:– EnergyConservationStandardsforCeilingFanLightKits;– DocketNumberEERE‐2012‐BT‐STD‐0045;and– RegulatoryIdentificationNumber(RIN)1904‐AC87.•Email:CeilingFanLightKits2012STD0045@ee.doe.govPostal:Courier:Ms.BrendaEdwardsU.S.DepartmentofEnergyBuildingTechnologiesProgram,MailstopEE‐2J1000IndependenceAvenue,SWWashington,DC20585‐0121Ms.BrendaEdwardsU.S.DepartmentofEnergyBuildingTechnologiesProgram,Suite600950L’EnfantPlaza,SWWashington,DC20024Tel:202586‐2945EnergyConservationStandardsTSDCommentPeriodcloses:December30,2014,11:59PMEDT