alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
ACCOMPANYING FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-2000             JUN-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1999             JUL-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000             JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                           6,191                   9,668
<SECURITIES>                                         0                   3,001
<RECEIVABLES>                                   10,533                  10,565
<ALLOWANCES>                                       201                     218
<INVENTORY>                                      3,484                   5,017
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                24,089                  30,804
<PP&E>                                          14,946                  14,285
<DEPRECIATION>                                   7,129                   5,985
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  44,221                  40,799
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            6,506                  14,112
<BONDS>                                              0                      67
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                            10                       9
<OTHER-SE>                                      37,705                  26,586
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    44,221                  40,799
<SALES>                                         56,512                  50,689
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                56,512                  50,689
<CGS>                                           28,115                  25,202
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   28,115                  25,202
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                35,124                  26,928
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     7                     341
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 259                     713
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (6,986)                 (2,154)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (2,001)                   (692)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (4,985)                 (1,462)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (4,985)                 (1,462)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.52)                  (0.17)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.52)                  (0.17)


</TABLE>
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.8

                        CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

The Board of Directors
Mobinil For Telecommunications

    We consent to the use of our report included herein and to the reference to
our firm under the heading "Experts" in the prospectus.

                                           /s/ KPMG Hazem Hassan


Cairo, Egypt
September 14, 2000
# C_2015062EN.01000401.xml

| 20.2.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 62/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.2.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 62/4

---

Unilateral Declarations on Article 8 of the Convention on the elimination of double taxation in connection with the adjustment of profits of associated enterprises (1)

1

(2015/C 62/04)

DECLARATION BY CROATIA

DECLARATION BY CROATIA

‘The term “serious penalty” means a penalty for all taxation-related offences laid down in the General Tax Act and special tax laws, and a penalty for economic crimes laid down in the Criminal Code.’

DECLARATION BY IRELAND

DECLARATION BY IRELAND

‘Ireland will regard as “serious penalties” those where criminal proceedings are being taken, or have been taken, in the particular case because serious tax evasion was suspected.’

---

(1)  Council Decision 2014/899/EU of 9 December 2014 concerning the accession of Croatia to the Convention of 23 July 1990 on the elimination of double taxation in connection with the adjustment of profits of associated enterprises (OJ L 358, 13.12.2014, p. 19).

1

---
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 5(a)

                          [PORTER & HEDGES LETTERHEAD]




                               September 29, 2000


Securities and Exchange Commission
Judiciary Plaza
450 Fifth Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20549

         Re: ESENJAY EXPLORATION, INC. REGISTRATION STATEMENT ON FORM S-8;
             LONG-TERM INCENTIVE PLAN

Ladies and Gentlemen:

         We have acted as counsel to Esenjay Exploration, Inc., a Delaware
corporation ("Company"), in connection with the preparation for filing with the
Securities and Exchange Commission of a Registration Statement on Form S-8
("Registration Statement") under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended. The
Registration Statement relates to the registration of a total of 2,803,585
shares ("Shares") of the Company's common stock, par value $.01 per share
("Common Stock"), issuable pursuant to the Company's Long-Term Incentive Plan.

         We have examined the Long-Term Incentive Plan and such corporate
records, documents, instruments and certificates of the Company, and have
reviewed such questions of law as we have deemed necessary, relevant or
appropriate to enable us to render the opinion expressed herein. In such
examination, we have assumed without independent investigation the authenticity
of all documents submitted to us as originals, the genuineness of all
signatures, the legal capacity of all natural persons, and the conformity of any
documents submitted to us as copies to their respective originals. As to certain
questions of fact material to this opinion, we have relied without independent
investigation upon statements or certificates of public officials and officers
of the Company.

         Based upon such examination and review, we are of the opinion that the
Shares have been duly and validly authorized and will, upon issuance and
delivery as contemplated by the Long-Term Incentive Plan, be validly issued,
fully paid and nonassessable outstanding shares of Common Stock.

         This Firm consents to the filing of this opinion as an exhibit to the
Registration Statement.


                                             Very truly yours,

                                             /s/ Porter & Hedges, L.L.P.

                                             PORTER & HEDGES, L.L.P.
I

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 3999

To amend the Illinois and Michigan Canal Heritage Corridor Act of 1984

to modify the boundaries of the corridor, and for other purposes.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 10, 1994

Mr. LIPINSKI (for himself, Mr. SANGMEISTER, Mr. RUSH, Mr. REYNOLDS,

and Mr. FAWELL) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Natural Resources

A BILL

To amend the Illinois and Michigan Canal Heritage Corridor

Act of 1984 to modify the boundaries of the corridor,

and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF BOUNDARIES.

4 Section 104(b)(1) of the Illinois and Michigan Canal

5 National Heritage Corridor Act of 1984 (16 U.S.C. 461

6 note) is amended to read as follows:

7 ‘‘(1) The corridor shall consist of the areas depicted

8 on—
2

•HR 3999 IH

1 ‘‘(A) the map entitled ‘Illinois and Michigan

2 Canal National Heritage Corridor’, dated May 1983

3 and numbered IMC–80,000;

4 ‘‘(B) the map entitled ‘Illinois and Michigan

5 Canal National Heritage Corridor—Boundary Defi6 nition for portions of the Corridor East of Harlem

7 Avenue’, dated –––––––– and numbered ––––––––;

8 and

9 ‘‘(C) the map entitled ‘Illinois and Michigan

10 Canal National Heritage Corridor—Boundary Defi11 nition for the Lake Renwick Zone’, dated –––––––

12 and numbered ––––––––,

13 which maps shall be on file and available for public inspec14 tion in the offices of the Commission and in the offices

15 of the National Park Service.’’.

16 SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF COMMISSION.

17 Section 111(a) of the Illinois and Michigan Canal Na18 tional Heritage Corridor Act of 1984 (98 Stat. 1456; 16

19 U.S.C. 461 note) is amended by striking out ‘‘ten’’ and

20 inserting ‘‘20’’.

Æ
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-15-00296-CV

In re LaDelle Abilez

K. G., Appellant

v.

Texas Department of Family and Protective Services, Appellee

FROM THE 126TH DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, 

NO. D-1-FM-14-002010, THE HONORABLE GISELA D. TRIANA, JUDGE PRESIDING

O R D E R T O S H O W C A U S E

PER CURIAM

This is a contempt proceeding ancillary to the appeal of K. G. The subject of this 

proceeding is court reporter LaDelle Abilez, who has failed to comply with this Court’s order to 

file the reporter’s record.

On May 28, 2015, we ordered Abilez to file the record by June 8, 2015, and 

cautioned her that failure to file the record by that date could require her to show cause why she

should not be held in contempt of court.

Therefore, it is hereby ordered that LaDelle Abilez shall appear in person before 

this Court on Wednesday, June 24, 2015, at 3:00 p.m., in the Third Court of Appeals courtroom, 

located on the first floor of the Price Daniel, Sr. Building, 209 West 14th Street, in Austin, Travis 

County, Texas, to show cause why she should not be held in contempt and have sanctions 
imposed for her failure to obey our May 28, 2015 order. This order to show cause will be 

withdrawn and Abilez will be relieved of her obligation to appear before this Court as ordered 

above if the Clerk of the Court receives the complete reporter’s record on or before Monday, 

June 22, 2015.

It is ordered on June 10, 2015.

Before Justices Puryear, Pemberton and Bourland
An official website of the United States government                

----

end of header

Census.govNewsroomReleasesIncome & WealthMiscellaneous

# Newsroom Archive

Skip left menu navigation                          - About the Newsroom
                          - Facts for Features
                          - **News Releases**
                          - Press Kits
                          - Tip Sheets

### Release Information

**CB12-TPS.41**
**Contact:**  Public Information Office301-763-3030

## FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:  TUESDAY, JULY 10, 2012

## Dynamics of Economic Well-Being: Participation in Government Programs, 2004 to 2007 and 2009 — Who Gets Assistance? 

Almost 45 million people, or 18.6 percent of the U.S. civilian noninstitutionalized population, participated in one or more major means-tested assistance programs each month in 2009. These statistics come from a new report that examines the participation and characteristics of people who received benefits from any of the major means-tested assistance programs including: Temporary Assistance for Needy Families, General Assistance, Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program/Food Stamp, Supplemental Security Income, Medicaid and Housing Assistance. The statistics come from the 2004 and 2008 Panels of the Survey of Income and Program Participation and cover calendar years 2004 through 2007 and 2009. Internet address: <https://www.census.gov/prod/2012pubs/p70-130.pdf>

**No news release associated with this report. Tip Sheet only.**

CONNECT WITH US**********

                            - Information Quality
                            - Data Linkage Infrastructure
                            - Data Protection and Privacy Policy
                            - Accessibility
                            - FOIA
                            - Inspector General
                            - No FEAR Act
                            - U.S. Department of Commerce
                            - USA.gov

----

Measuring America's People, Places, and Economy

Is this page helpful?
YesNo

NO THANKS

255 characters maximum255 characters maximum reached

Thank you for your feedback.Comments or suggestions? 

PIO@census.gov
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATIONS

I, Thomas R. Brown, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K/A of American Technology Corporation;

2. Based on my knowledge, this
report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;

Date: January 29, 2007



|                                                             
|-------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Thomas R. Brown                                          
|Thomas R. Brown,                                             
|President and Chief Executive Officer                        
|and Interim Chief Financial Officer                          
|(Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer)
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

No. 81858 

# 1 F LED NOV 1 7 2021 Eumirrii A. BROW+1
a c y :Kds7UPREME COURT DEPUTYRK No. 83744 DEXIN FRANK LIN, Appellant, vs. ANNA LIN, Res • ondent. DEXIN FRANK LIN, Appellant, vs. ANNA LIN, Res • ondent.

ORDER ADMINISTRATIVELY CLOSING APPEAL IN DOCKET NO. 83744 AND TRANSFERRING DOCUMENTS TO DOCKET NO. 81858

The notice of appeal documents in Docket No. 83744 indicate that appellant is attempting to appeal the order of affirmance issued by the Court of Appeals in Docket No. 81858-COA on October 22, 2021. The proper procedure for challenging a decision issued by the Court of Appeals is to file a petition for review in the Nevada Supreme Court pursuant to NRAP 40B. NRAP 40B(a). Accordingly, the notice of appeal filed in Docket No. 83744 is construed as a petition for review. The clerk of this court shall administratively close the appeal in Docket No. 83744 and transfer the documents filed in Docket No. 83744 to the appeal in Docket No. 81858. In light of this order, appellant may disregard the notice directing him to pay the filing fee in Docket No. 83744.

It is so ORDERED.

, C.J. Hardesty SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA I447A 0400 

## 0 11 - 

## 33 o g

### cc: Hon. Charles J. Hoskin, District Judge, Family Court Division Dexin Frank Lin The Law Offices of Frank J. Toti, Esq. Eighth District Court Clerk

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA
fo) 194/A ctigPir

, 

### 2

799.1TPITf7TAX-'

, • ;11'it. • 4!..•=422,a4t.iii.4.
EXHIBIT 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. {section} 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of China Bright Star Limited (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Jeremy Mork, Chief Executive and Financial  Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. {section} 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes- Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



|Dated:  May 13, 2011
By  /s/ Jeremy Mork
-----------------------------
    Jeremy Mork
    Chief Executive and  Financial Officer
   (Principal Executive and Financial Officer)
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
BRIAN QUINN

Chief Justice

PATRICK A. PIRTLE

Justice

JUDY C. PARKER

Justice

LAWRENCE M. DOSS

Justice

Court of Appeals

Seventh District of Texas

Potter County Courts Building

501 S. Fillmore, Suite 2-A

Amarillo, Texas 79101-2449

www.txcourts.gov/7thcoa.aspx

BOBBY RAMIREZ

Clerk

MAILING ADDRESS:

P. O. Box 9540

79105-9540

(806) 342-2650

January 12, 2021

Marcus Reed

317 La Grotta Lane

Georgetown, TX 78628

* DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL & POSTAL *

Emily Edwards

Assistant District Attorney

P.O. Box 1748

Austin, TX 78767

* DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL *

RE: Case Number: 07-19-00372-CR, 07-19-00373-CR

Trial Court Case Number: D-1-DC-19-904028, D-1-DC-19-904029

Style: Marcus Reed v. The State of Texas

Dear Mr. Reed and Counsel:

The Court this day issued an opinion and judgment in the captioned cause. TEX.

R. APP. P. 48.

In addition, pursuant to Texas Government Code, Sec. 51.204(b)(2), exhibits on 

file with this Court, if any, will be destroyed three years after final disposition of the case 

or at an earlier date if ordered by the Court.

Very truly yours,

Bobby Ramirez

Bobby Ramirez, Clerk

cc: Honorable P. David Wahlberg (DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL)

Velva L. Price (DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL)

FILE COPY
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

ACME ENERGY SERVICES, INC. d/b/a 

RIG MOVERS EXPRESS,

 Appellant,

v.

SANDRA H. STALEY, INDIVIDUALLY 

AS INDEPENDENT EXECUTRIX OF 

THE ESTATE OF GEORGE G. STALEY, 

DECEASED, AND AS TRUSTEE OF 

THE TAX FREE TRUST FOR SANDRA 

H. STALEY,

 Appellee.

§

§

§

§

§

§ 

§

§

No. 08-17-00148-CV

Appeal from the

109th District Court 

of Winkler County, Texas 

(TC# 15,687–B) 

J U D G M E N T

The Court has considered this cause on the record and concludes there was no error in the 

judgment. We therefore affirm the judgment of the court below. We further order that Appellee 

recover from Appellant and its sureties, if any, see TEX.R.APP.P. 43.5, on the judgment and all 

costs of this appeal, for which let execution issue. This decision shall be certified below for 

observance.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 22ND DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2019.

YVONNE T. RODRIGUEZ, Justice

Before Rodriguez, J., Palafox, J., and Larsen, Senior Judge

Larsen, Senior Judge (Sitting by Assignment)
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                           6,575
<SECURITIES>                                 1,026,217
<RECEIVABLES>                                   18,020
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,522,478
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                        234,400
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         4,011
<OTHER-SE>                                     676,671
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,522,478
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                97,884
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  115,076
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    48
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               8,134
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (5,684)
<INCOME-TAX>                                        44
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (5,728)
<DISCONTINUED>                                     (0)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                    (0)
<CHANGES>                                          (0)
<NET-INCOME>                                   (5,728)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.15)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.15)


</TABLE>
#### Robert Lee CONEY, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 72-108.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Dec. 12, 1972.

Robert Lee Coney, in pro. per.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., for appel-lee.

Before BARKDULL, C. J., and PEARSON and HAVERFIELD, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

This court, proceeding in the manner outlined and recommended by the Supreme Court of the United States in Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 744, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493, having deferred ruling on a motion of the public defender to withdraw as counsel for the indigent defendant-appellant, and having furnished appellant with a copy of the public defender’s memorandum brief, and having allowed the appellant a reasonable specified time within which to raise any points that he chose in support of this appeal, and the appellant having filed his response thereto, on consideration thereof upon full examination of the proceedings we conclude that the appeal is wholly frivolous. Whereupon, the public defender’s said motion to withdraw is granted, and the order or judgment appealed is hereby affirmed.
103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 3516

AN ACT

To increase the amount authorized to be approtional Military Park in Georgia. garding the Chickamauga and Chattanooga Na- priated for assistance for highway relocation re-
103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 3516

AN ACT

To increase the amount authorized to be appropriated for

assistance for highway relocation regarding the Chickamauga and Chattanooga National Military Park in

Georgia.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. INCREASE IN AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIA4 TIONS.

5 Section 1(c) of the Act entitled ‘‘An Act to authorize

6 and direct the National Park Service to assist the State

7 of Georgia in relocating a highway affecting the Chicka8 mauga and Chattanooga National Military Park in Geor9 gia’’, approved December 24, 1987 (101 Stat. 1442), is
2

•HR 3516 EH

1 amended by striking ‘‘$30,000,000’’ and inserting

2 ‘‘$45,000,000’’.

Passed the House of Representatives March 21,

1994.

Attest:

Clerk.
EXHIBIT 10c

                                 PROMISSORY NOTE


$ 632,472.00                                                   December 31, 1997
------------                                                   -----------------

         FOR VALUE  RECEIVED,  Rodney I. Smith  promises  to pay to the order of
Smith-Midland  Corporation,  a Delaware  corporation with its principal place of
business at Route 28, P.O. Box 300, Midland,  Virginia on or before December 31,
2002,  the principle sum of Six Hundred  Thirty-Two  Thousand,  Four Hundred and
Seventy-Two  Dollars  ($632,472.00)  together  with  interest  at the rate of 6%
simple  interest  per annum.  Payments  shall be paid  annually in the amount of
$45,948.00  beginning on December 31,  1998.  Payments  will be allocated to the
payment of interest first and then to payment of principle.

         The proceeds of this note are to be used exclusively to payoff the full
remaining  balance  of  $632,472.00  of the of the note  dated  January  2, 1996
between Rodney I. Smith and Smith-Midland Corporation.

         Signed as of the date first written above.

                                       /s/ Rodney I. Smith
                                       -------------------------
                                       Rodney I. Smith

Agree and Acknowledged

Smith-Midland Corporation

By: /s/ Robert V. McElhinney
       --------------------------------------