alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 169 (Thursday, August 30, 2018)]
[Presidential Documents]
[Page 44171]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-19025]




                        Presidential Documents 



Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 169 / Thursday, August 30, 2018 / 
Presidential Documents

___________________________________________________________________

Title 3--
The President

[[Page 44171]]

                Proclamation 9775 of August 27, 2018

                
Death of Senator John Sidney McCain III

                By the President of the United States of America

                A Proclamation

                As a mark of respect for the memory and longstanding 
                service of Senator John Sidney McCain III, I hereby 
                order, by the authority vested in me by the 
                Constitution and the laws of the United States of 
                America, that the flag of the United States shall be 
                flown at half-staff at the White House and upon all 
                public buildings and grounds, at all military posts and 
                naval stations, and on all naval vessels of the Federal 
                Government in the District of Columbia and throughout 
                the United States and its Territories and possessions 
                until sunset, on the day of interment. I also direct 
                that the flag shall be flown at half-staff for the same 
                period at all United States embassies, legations, 
                consular offices, and other facilities abroad, 
                including all military facilities and naval vessels and 
                stations.

                IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 
                twenty-seventh day of August, in the year of our Lord 
                two thousand eighteen, and of the Independence of the 
                United States of America the two hundred and forty-
                third.
                <GRAPHIC(S) NOT AVAILABLE IN TIFF FORMAT>
                
                    (Presidential Sig.)

[FR Doc. 2018-19025
Filed 8-29-18; 8:45 am]
Billing code 3295-F8-P
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 3384

To repeal certain provisions of law relating to trading with Indians.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

OCTOBER 27, 1993

Mr. KYL (for himself and Ms. ENGLISH of Arizona) introduced the following

bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

A BILL

To repeal certain provisions of law relating to trading with

Indians.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. REPEAL.

4 Section 437 of title 18, United States Code, is

5 repealed.

Æ
EXHIBIT-32.1

EXHIBIT 32.1

Section 1350 Certifications



I am the Principal Executive Officer and Principal
Financial Officer of JA Energy, a Nevada corporation (the “Company”). I am delivering this certificate in connection
with the Form 10-Q/A of the Company for the quarter year ended November 30, 2013 and filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange
Commission (“Form 10-Q”).



Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of JA Energy (the “Company”) certifies
to his knowledge that:



|    |                                                                                                                                                                                                               
|--- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(1) | The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A of the Company for the quarterly period ended November 30, 2013 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|    |                                                                                                                                                                                                               
|(2) | The information contained in that Form 10-Q/A fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial conditions and results of operations of the Company.                                                   



|                                                               
|---------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ James Lusk                                                 
|James Lusk                                                     
|Principal Executive Officer
        Principal Financial Officer
|                                                               
|Date: February 13, 2014                                        
|
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Surface Transportation Board

The Surface Transportation Board has received a request from the Association of American Railroads (WB18-28—7/30/18) for permission to use data from the Board's 2017 Masked Carload Waybill Sample. A copy of this request may be obtained from the Board's website under docket no. WB18-28.

The waybill sample contains confidential railroad and shipper data; therefore, if any parties object to these requests, they should file their objections with the Director of the Board's Office of Economics within 14 calendar days of the date of this notice. The rules for release of waybill data are codified at 49 CFR 1244.9.

*Contact:*                     Alexander Dusenberry, (202) 245-0319.                

Jeffrey Herzig,

Clearance Clerk.

[FR Doc. 2018-18841 Filed 8-29-18; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE 4915-01-P
#### The State of Ohio, Appellee, *v.*Evans, Appellant.

(No. 30593

Decided February 13, 1946.)

*Mr. Glenn E. Detling,*prosecuting attorney, and *Mr. Robert S. Olinger,*for appellee.

*Mr. James C. Cobb, Mr. John J. Chester*and *Mr. Jack Young,*for appellant.

It is ordered and adjudged that this appeal as of right be, and the same hereby is, dismissed for the reason that no debatable constitutional question is involved.

*Appeal dismissed.*

Weygandt, C. J., Zimmerman, Bell, Williams, Turner, Matthias and Hart, JJ., concur.
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Finance and Accounting Service Providing payment services for the U.S. Department of Defense

Search
Search

Search

              - 
              - 
              - 
              - 
              - 

-  Military Member		 
-  Retired Military & Annuitant		 
-  Civilian Employee		 
-  Contractor & Vendor		 

Homemypayinfo2FA

                        - 2020 IRS W4
                        - Leave and Earnings Statements
                        - Summary View Documents
                        - Opt In for Electronic Delivery
                        - Use the Right URL
                        - Two-Factor Authentication                            - Initial Set Up
                          - Add Authenticator App
                          - Some Things To Know About Online Security
                        - myPay Browser Requirements
                        - myPay Help
                        - Password Rules                            - Password Reset Questions
                          - Password FAQs
                        - myPay Tips
                        - Protect Yourself Online                            - Mobile Apps
                          More

**myPay announces mandatory Two-Factor Authentication now available****How it works****How important is it?**Internal Revenue Service**Get with the program**
**Page updated March 20, 2023**

### Stay Connected

Department of Defense     Department of Veterans Affairs     Military Employment Verification     Warrior Care Website     Defense Contract Mgmt Agency  DoD Forms     Department of State     Civilian Personnel Mgmt Service     DTS Travel Center     System for Award Mgmt (SAM)    Congressional/LegislationPersonnel Force Innovation     Freedom of Information Act     DFAS Hotline   Contact Us     Accessibility / Section 508    EEO / No Fear Act  

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1


                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS


We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in this Registration
Statement on Form S-8 of our report dated March 10, 2000 relating to the
consolidated financial statements of Arden Group, Inc., which appears in Arden
Group, Inc.'s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended January 1,
2000.


/s/ PRICEWATERSHOUSECOOPERS LLP


Los Angeles, California
September 27, 2000
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court 

Lansing, Michigan 

October 26, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

135090 Michael F. Cavanagh 

& (3)

(4) 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman,

GRIEVANCE ADMINISTRATOR, 

Petitioner-Appellee, 

 Justices 

v SC: 135090 

ADB No.: 05-79-GA 

CARL M. WEIDEMAN, III,

Respondent-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the motion for immediate consideration is GRANTED. 

The motion for stay is DENIED. The application for leave to appeal remains pending. 

l1023 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

October 26, 2007 

Clerk
Filed 1/26/21 P. v. Parker CA5

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for 

publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication 

or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

THE PEOPLE,

Plaintiff and Respondent,

v.

DEWAYNE KEITH PARKER,

Defendant and Appellant.

F079785

(Super. Ct. No. P16900179-3)

OPINION

THE COURT*

APPEAL from orders of the Superior Court of Fresno County. Mark E. Cullers, 

Judge.

Peggy A. Headley, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and 

Appellant.

Office of the State Attorney General, Sacramento, California, for Plaintiff and 

Respondent.

-ooOoo-

* Before Poochigian, Acting P.J., Meehan, J. and DeSantos, J.
2.

Appointed counsel for defendant Dewayne Keith Parker asked this court to review 

the record to determine whether there are any arguable issues on appeal. (People v. 

Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436.) Defendant was advised of his right to file a supplemental 

brief within 30 days of the date of filing of the opening brief. Defendant did not respond. 

Finding no arguable error that would result in a disposition more favorable to defendant, 

we affirm.

BACKGROUND

On March 27, 2012, defendant was convicted by plea of vehicle manslaughter 

with gross negligence (Pen. Code, § 192, subd. (c)(1); count 1) and corporal injury to a 

spouse (Pen. Code, § 273.5, subd. (a)). The trial court sentenced him to eight years in 

prison.

On July 9, 2016, defendant was released on parole. His parole was scheduled to 

expire on April 13, 2021.

On July 26, 2019, defendant’s parole officer filed a petition for revocation of 

defendant’s parole, alleging various parole violations.

At a parole violation hearing on July 30, 2019, defendant informed the trial court 

he wished to admit the allegation that he failed to enroll in an outpatient drug treatment 

program. Defense counsel stated the admission was against his advice. But defendant 

insisted. The court advised him of the various rights he was giving up and defendant 

responded that he understood. He also stated he had had enough time to discuss the 

rights with counsel. Defendant admitted the allegation, stating he was doing so because it 

was true; he said he knew the conduct was a violation of parole. The court found his 

admission voluntarily and knowingly made. The court found he had violated parole. It 

ordered 100 days in custody, awarded credits, and reinstated parole under the original 

terms and conditions.
3.

On August 6, 2019, defendant filed a letter stating he wished to appeal the court’s 

order.

We have reviewed the record and find no arguable error that would result in a 

disposition more favorable to defendant.

DISPOSITION

The trial court’s July 30, 2019 orders are affirmed.
#### Geraldine PYATT, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Dewey L. MERCER et ux., Defendant-Appellant.

No. 2296.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana. Third Circuit.

Feb. 7, 1968.

Holt & Woodley by Edmund E. Woodley, Lake Charles, for defendant-appellant.

Francis E. Mire, Lake Charles, for plaintiff-appellee.

PER CURIAM:

Plaintiff-appellee moved to dismiss the suspensive appeal on the grounds that the defendant “failed to post a bond for a suspensive appeal as the law directs.” No further explanation of the reasons for the motion is given.

We find the record contains a suspensive appeal bond, which, on its face, is proper. The motion to dismiss the suspensive appeal is denied.

Motion to Dismiss denied.
Exhibit 32.1   CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002   The undersigned, Douglas Thomas, hereby certifies, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (1)the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of DTS8 Coffee Company, Ltd. for the period ended July 31, 2015 (the Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of DTS8 Coffee Company Ltd.  Dated:  September 14, 2015/s/ Douglas ThomasDouglas Thomas
President, Chief Executive Officer,
Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer, Secretary and Director(Principal Executive Officer, Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A18A0083. TIPTON SCOTT MASTERSON v. NATIONAL COLLEGIATE

STUDENT LOAN TRUST 2003-1.

On November 16, 2016, the trial court granted National Collegiate Student

Loan Trust 2003-1’s motion for summary judgment against Tipton Scott Masterson. 

On April 5, 2017, Masterson file his notice of appealseeking to appeal that trial court

order. We, however, lack jurisdiction.

To be timely, a notice of appeal must be filed within 30 days after entry of the

order on appeal. See OCGA § 5-6-38 (a). The proper and timely filing of a notice of

appeal is an absolute requirement to confer jurisdiction on this Court. See Couch v.

United Paperworkers Intl. Union, 224 Ga. App. 721, 721 (482 SE2d 704) (1997). 

Here, Masterson’s notice of appeal was filed 140 days after entry of the order he

seeks to appeal. Accordingly, this untimely appeal is hereby DISMISSED for lack

of jurisdiction.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

August 16, 2017

08/16/2017
#### Nathaniel Highley, Respondent, *vs.*Mary A. Noell, Appellant.

*Practice, civil*— Demurrer, *waiver, etc.*— A party failing to except on demurrer overruled, and answering over, cannot afterward raise the points involved in the demurrer, before the Supreme Court.

*Jlppeal from Perry Circuit Court.*

*J. W.*Nicholson, for Appellant.

*Robinson & Clardy,*for Respondent.

Wagner, Judge,

delivered the opinion of the court.

The objection urged by the counsel for the appellant in his brief to the petition, and the action of the court in refusing *146to have a jury empaneled on the trial, are not available. The petition contained two counts; the first was in the nature of a declaration at law for money had and received, and asked for judgment for the sum alleged to be due; the second count was equitable in its character, but did not conclude with a prayer for any relief.

On the trial no attention was paid to the count in equity, but the petition was treated as an action at law, and judgment given on the first court only: Undoubtedly the defendant had the right to demand a jury, and the refusal qf the court to comply with the request would have been good ground for reversal, had not the point been expressly waived by an agreement filed in the cause. The error of the court in refusing defendant a jury is explicitly waived, and therefore it will not be further noticed. A demurrer was interposed to the petition, and also a motion to strike out a part of the same, both of which were overruled. But as no exceptions were taken to the ruling of the court, and the defendant thereafter filed an answer, there is no point saved in that regard for revision. The petition was good enough as a common law declaration, and certainly sufficient after verdict.

The evidence was admissible. The contents of the letters proved; showed that the proper diligence had been made in searching for the original, and that they were lost and could not be found.

It was entirely competent to show by parol evidence the real object and purpose of the assignment, and to whom the money rightfully belonged.

There does not appear to be any substantial error in the record and the judgment will be affirmed.

Judge Adams concurs. Judge Bliss absent.
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4069 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4069

     To amend title 18, United States Code, to include private and 
     commercial interstate carriers in the mail fraud prohibitions.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 17, 1994

   Miss Collins of Michigan introduced the following bill; which was 
               referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
     To amend title 18, United States Code, to include private and 
     commercial interstate carriers in the mail fraud prohibitions.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled, That section 1341 of 
title 18, United States Code, is amended--
            (1) by inserting ``or deposits or causes to be deposited 
        any matter or thing whatever to be sent or delivered by any 
        private or commercial interstate carrier,'' after ``Postal 
        Service''; and
            (2) by inserting ``or such carrier'' after ``causes to be 
        delivered by mail''.

                                 <all>
```
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4107 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4107

    To amend the Radiation Exposure Compensation Act to remove the 
requirement that exposure resulting in stomach cancer occur before age 
                      30, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 22, 1994

  Mrs. Mink introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To amend the Radiation Exposure Compensation Act to remove the 
requirement that exposure resulting in stomach cancer occur before age 
                      30, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REMOVAL OF REQUIREMENT THAT EXPOSURE RESULTING IN STOMACH 
              CANCER OCCUR BEFORE AGE 30.

    Section 4(b)(2) of the Radiation Exposure Compensation Act (42 
U.S.C. 2210 note) is amended by striking ``(provided initial exposure 
occurred before age 30)''.

SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE CLAIMS FORMERLY BARRED.

    Section 8 of the Radiation Exposure Compensation Act (42 U.S.C. 
2210 note) is amended--
            (1) by inserting ``(a) In General.--'' before ``A claim''; 
        and
            (2) by adding at the end the following new subsection:
    ``(b) Stomach Cancer Claims Formerly Barred.--
            ``(1) Extension of time.--A claim by an individual 
        described in section 4(a)(2), who submits the documentation 
        required by such section to show that the individual contracted 
        cancer of the stomach after initial exposure that occurred at 
        or after age 30, shall be barred unless filed within 20 years 
        after the date of the enactment of this subsection.
            ``(2) Claims previously denied.--An individual may reapply 
        for payment under this Act if the individual's claim under 
        section 4(a)(2) was denied before the date of the enactment of 
        this subsection on the grounds that the specific disease 
        claimed by the individual was cancer of the stomach and the 
        initial exposure of the individual did not occur before age 
        30.''.

                                 <all>
```