alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
argument solely with references to Article 2 of the Uniform Commercial 

Code, as codified in NRS Chapter 104, and NRS Chapter 646. "A single 

governing statute may be all the support needed to establish a point." 

Hernandez v. State, 117 Nev. 463, 466, 24 P.3d 767, 769 (2001). But in 

this case the applicability of Article 2 of the Uniform Commercial Code is 

not readily apparent and Palace Jewelry provides neither relevant legal 

authority nor cogent argument as to why the text of these statutes 

supports their application to this dispute. More to the point, our 

independent research shows that "pawnbroking is an activity governed by 

Article 9 of the UCC." In re Schwalb, 347 B.R. 726, 739-40 (Bankr. D. 

Nev. 2006) (emphasis added); see also 8A Lary Lawrence, Lawrence's 

Anderson on the Uniform Commercial Code § 9-102:151 (3d ed. 2005) 

("Article 9 applies to a pledge of personal property."). And Article 9 differs 

meaningfully from Article 2 and does not, on its face, advance Palace 

Jewelry's cause in any obvious way. 

As the appellant, Palace Jewelry bears the burden of 

demonstrating reversible error. Schwartz v. Estate of Greenspun, 110 

Nev. 1042, 1051, 881 P.2d 638, 644 (1994) ("We will not reverse an order 

or judgment unless error is affirmatively shown."); Lawrence v. Burnham, 

4 Nev. 361, 363 (1868) ("The burden of showing error is upon the party 

alleging it."). This Palace Jewelry has failed to do. Because Palace 

Jewelry has failed to cite any relevant authority to establish reversible 

...continued 

when the redemption time for each of the pawns ... expired," so this issue 

does not merit our prolonged consideration. NRAP 28(a)(9); Randall v. 

Salvation Army, 100 Nev. 466, 470-71, 686 P.2d 241, 244 (1984). 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 2 

(0) 1947A meo 
error, the district court's order granting summary judgment in favor of 

Zloof is affirmed. 

It is so ORDERED. 

Gibbons 

hoe. 

Pickering 

J. 

J. 

J. 

cc: Hon. Patrick Flanagan, District Judge 

Jill I. Greiner, Settlement Judge 

Law Offices of Curtis B. Coulter 

Justice Law Center 

Washoe District Court Clerk 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 3 

(0) 1947A en
#### Larry CHARLES, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Samuel FREEMAN et al., Defendant-Appellee.

No. 3882.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Third Circuit.

June 19, 1972.

Before HOOD, CULPEPPER and MILLER, JJ.

HOOD, Judge.

This is an action for damages arising out of a motor vehicle collision which occurred in St. Landry Parish on February 23, 1970. The suit was instituted by Larry Charles against Samuel Freeman, Opelou-sas Area Vocational School and Associated Indemnity Corporation. The trial court rendered judgment for defendants, and plaintiff has appealed.

The instant suit was consolidated for trial and appeal with two other suits which arose out of the same accident. Separate decrees are being rendered in these consolidated cases today. See Williams v. Freeman et al., La.App., 263 So.2d 441, and Malbrew et al. v. Freeman et al., La.App., 263 So.2d 443.

The issue presented here was considered and determined in the case of Williams v. Freeman et al., supra. For the reasons which we assigned in that case, we conclude that defendant Freeman was free from negligence, that defendants are not liable and that there is no error in the judgment rendered by the trial court rejecting plaintiff’s demands.

The judgment appealed from in the instant suit is affirmed. The costs of this suit are assessed to plaintiff-appellant.

Affirmed.
EXHIBIT 32.2
                    Certification of Principal Executive Officer
                            Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350
                   (Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)

I, Jeff Johnson, Chief Accounting Officer of Winning Edge International, Inc.
(the "Registrant") do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to
the best of my knowledge, based upon a review of the Annual Report on Form 10-
KSB for the year ended July 31, 2006 of the Registrant, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"):

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.


                              By:/s/
                                 -----------------------------------
                                 Jeff Johnson
                                 Chief Accounting Officer

November 13, 2006

 * A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to Winning Edge International, Inc. and will be retained by
Winning Edge International, Inc. and furnished to the Securities Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
IIA

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 3982

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

MAY 25 (legislative day, MAY 16), 1994

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and

Public Works

AN ACT

To amend the Marine Protection, Research, and Sanctuaries

Act of 1972 to prohibit the ocean dumping of radioactive

waste.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Ocean Radioactive

5 Dumping Ban Act of 1994’’.

6 SEC. 2. AMENDMENTS TO THE OCEAN DUMPING ACT.

7 The Marine Protection, Research, and Sanctuaries

8 Act of 1972 (33 U.S.C. 1401 et seq.) is amended—

9 (1) in section 3 (33 U.S.C. 1402), by—

10 (A) striking paragraph (j); and
2

HR 3982 RFS

1 (B) redesignating the following paragraphs

2 accordingly;

3 (2) by altering any reference to the paragraphs

4 redesignated under paragraph (1) of this Act;

5 (3) in section 102(a) (33 U.S.C. 1412(a)), by

6 striking ‘‘high-level’’ before ‘‘radioactive waste’’; and

7 (4) in section 104 (33 U.S.C. 1414), by striking

8 subsection (i).

9 SEC. 3. CLARIFICATION.

10 Nothing in this Act shall affect the transportation of

11 material containing de minimis levels of radioactivity for

12 the purpose of dumping it into ocean waters under the

13 Marine Protection, Research, and Sanctuaries Act of

14 1972.

Passed the House of Representatives May 23, 1994.

Attest: DONNALD K. ANDERSON,

Clerk.
p. 1 

# OAR Box 1384 Prepped by Charmelle Mathews



### Document

Number: 

# 58 ) ll-E-1 8 Docket Number: 

# A-94-5 2

Printed 7/2/2008 8:42:05 AM

Sheet 58 of 264P. 2 %2 ,., r. ^7~~9^^"^\

CONTAC T REPOR T From : Madelein e Strum , US EPA , OAQPS/ESD , Coating s an d Consume

r Product s Grou

p Dat e o f Contact : Februar

y 6 , 199 5 Contact : Mr . Rober

t Leitzma n Company/Agency : Cyte c Industries , Perrysburg Plant , Perrysburg , Ohio Telephon e Number : 41 9 87 2 141 1 CONTAC T SUMMARY : I contacte d Mr . Leitzma

n wit h regar d to asourc e reductio n techniqu e tha t wa s reporte d o

n Cytec' s 199 3 Screenin g Surve y Respons e for

th e composit

e plastic s industry . Th e surve y respons e reporte d tha

t Cyte c ha d plan s to enclos e th e mixin g tank s in whic h bul k moldin g compound (BMC ) i s produce d and recycl e evaporativ e styren e emissio n losse s bac k t o th e mixer

- . . b 2 o^.-rmec/bmiiii / * e*f**«< Mr . Leitzma

n indicate d tha

t thisvtechnique ha s alread

y bee n institute d o

n anumbe

r o f ne w •mi x tanks , an

d tha t it s effect has-bee n t o reduc e th e quantit

y o f styrene needed fo

r BMC productio n (du e to th e decrease , i n los s o f styrene) . Th e nex

t ste p whic h i s bein g worke d o

n no w i s to E©weft

t existin g mix tank s to-instal l th e recycl e lints . T l existin g mix tank s to-instal l th e recycl e lints . Thi s i s mor e complicate d du e t o th e difficult

y in gettin g acomplet

e sea l o n th e existin g mi

x equipment . Thes e change s to th e mix equipmen

t are bein g institute d a s acost-savin g measur e tha t would bot

h reduc e styrene emission s and reduc e th e styrene , neede d fo r BMC production . Mr . Leitzma

n indicate d tha

t there would stil l b e emissions ; fass'(5'ciated~wit

h BMC productio n durin g th e transfe

r o f th e BM C fro mth e mix tank s int

o bag's/and/o'

r cpntkiriersftcTib

e shipped . 

### ii'lli OCT

i 0

### po- •'/ ! ADDITIONA

L QUESTIONS : i I ^ i}j\ Wha t i s th e rang e o

f th e siz e capacit

y o f mixing tank s and-tfie4ni3cing0^1 & jtiriie * fo r which th e styren e recyclin g techniqu e i s being utilized ? "*-- "

5d>-Zr#- _'

£,00/--•/W

- £jc/e 7/'*'•-'• • tAc-r*** 3 f A> Hav e yo u investigate d th e feasibilit y o f variou s size/mixin g time s fo r whic h th e techniqu e i s technically o r

economically feasibl e (or

no t feasible) , and i

f so , wha t wer e th e results ? fLn.cr,-e^;%. Irx

„'l*-cc e i i Hav e yo u replace d some/al l o

f th e methylene chlorid e (used fo r cleaning ) wit

h anon-HAP cleanin g material ? I f

so , wha t quantit y wa s replace d an

d wha t cleaning operatio n i s th e methylene chlorid e stil l needed for ? /Lyre, x.^Jefy S-O'is rtf ic <.**/>. At

e&y /#« • Ck/vr. tO ; s , stil l

us a J in c*-e* s r

«- g "*'<•*'<•"*

> yu<ek i-x.'^-n^o.t.t/ ) n C I e& n^t, n a • 

# w?< /
<PAGE>

                             UNITED STATES

                  SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

                        WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

                               FORM 8-K

                            CURRENT REPORT

    Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

    Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported): SEPTEMBER 28, 2000

                      --------------------------

                  PACKAGING RESOURCES INCORPORATED

         (Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)

            DELAWARE                 333-05885                  36-3321568
  (State or other jurisdiction      (Commission           (IRS Employer Number)
of Identification incorporation)    File Number)

                           ONE CONWAY PARK

                    100 FIELD DRIVE, SUITE 300

                    LAKE FOREST, ILLINOIS 60045

         (Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)

                          (847) 295-6100

         (Registrant's telephone number, including area code)

                                N/A

    (Former name or former address, if changed since last report)

<PAGE>

                       ITEM 5.  OTHER EVENTS.


          The previously reported agreement with Sweetheart Cup Company Inc.
and Mr. Dennis Mehiel, its Chairman and principal stockholder, relating to a
proposed sale of capital stock of Packaging Resources Group, Inc. ("Group")
has been terminated.

          A letter of intent ("Letter") has been entered into with Van Leer
Holding Inc., a subsidiary of Huhtamaki Van Leer Oyj, a Finnish company,
relating to a proposed sale of capital stock of Packaging Resources
Incorporated ("PRI") for a cash purchase price of $185 million.  The Letter
contemplates that PRI will have no debt for borrowed money at the closing.
Completion of the transaction will be subject to execution of definitive
documentation and certain other conditions, including consent of the holders
of the outstanding indebtedness of PRI and its parent, Group.  There can be
no assurance as to whether or when the proposed transaction will be completed.

<PAGE>

SIGNATURES:

Pursuant to the requirements of the securities Exchange Act of 1934, the
Registrant has duly caused this Report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

PACKAGING RESOURCES INCORPORATED, a Delaware corporation

Date: September 29, 2000


By:___________________________
Name:  Jerry J. Corirossi
Title: Executive Vice President, Finance and Administration
       Chief Financial Officer and duly authorized officer
|   | (i)    | the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of the Company, for the period  ended January 31, 2014, and to which this certification is attached as Exhibit 32 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and |
|--------|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                 |
|   | (ii)   | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.                                                                                                                                                                 |

|   |   |                              |   |
|--------|--------|-----------------------------------|--------|
|   | By:    | /s/ Adam Radly                    |   |
|   |   |                              |   |
|   | Name:  | Adam Radly                        |   |
|   |   |                              |   |
|   | Title: | Chief Executive Officer and Chief |   |
|   |   | Financial Officer       |
|   |   |                              |   |
|   | Date:  | March 18, 2014                    |   |

----
#### State of Maine *vs.*Albert Leo Croteau

Androscoggin.

Opinion, October 15, 1957.

*Gaston M. Dumais, Co. Atty.,*

*William D. Hathaway, Co. Atty.,*for the State.

*Robert F. Powers,*for defendant.

Sitting: Williamson, C. J., Webber, Beliveau, Tapley, Sullivan, Dubord, JJ.

Beliveau, J.

On exception. The respondent, in a complaint issued against him by the Lewiston Municipal Court, was charged with operating a motor vehicle while under the influence of drugs. This is made a criminal offense by Chap. 22, Sec. 150, R. S. The respondent demurred to this complaint in the Superior Court. The demurrer was overruled and exception taken.

The respondent’s position, as stated in his brief, is “. . . . that the term *Drugs*is vague and should be modified as set forth in the aforesaid statute by the word *Intoxicating*or specified with other appropriate description.”

*127In *State*v. *Munsey,*114 Me. 408, our court said, “. . . that the indictment or complaint is sufficient if it follows the statute so closely that the offense charged and the statute under which the indictment is found may be clearly identified.”

This is a statement of the law universally recognized by the courts.

This court takes judicial notice of the well recognized fact that overindulgence or consumption of drugs of any kind causes the user to be under the influence of drugs and if he operates a motor vehicle while in that condition, is guilty of a violation of Sec. 150, Chap. 22, R. S. This statute does not specify or mention the use of *intoxicating*drugs.

Generally “intoxication” refers to the excessive use of alcoholic liquors. The addition of the word “intoxicating” or some “other appropriate description” would not add to, or better describe, the statutory violation.

The allegation is in accordance with the offense set forth in the statute; gives the respondent ample information, and meets all the requirements of good pleading.

*Exception overruled.*

*Judgment for the State.*
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-7415

JACQUELINE STANTON STEWART, a/k/a Jackie,

Defendant - Appellant,

v.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Newport News. Jerome B. Friedman, District Judge. (4:05-cr-00009-WDK-JEB-27)

Submitted: November 20, 2008 Decided: December 1, 2008

Before MOTZ and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jacqueline Stanton Stewart, Appellant Pro Se. Eric Matthew Hurt, Assistant United States Attorney, Newport News, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM:

Jacqueline Stanton Stewart appeals the district

court’s order denying relief on her motion for modification

sentence, 28 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2000). We have reviewed the

record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for

the reasons stated by the district court. United States v.

Stewart , No. 4:05-cr-00009-WDK-JEB-27 (E.D. V a. filed July 7,

2008; entered July 10, 2008). We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented

in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED
<PAGE>

                                  UNITED STATES

                       SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

                             Washington, D.C. 20549

                             ----------------------

                                    FORM 8-K

                                 CURRENT REPORT

                     Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the
                         Securities Exchange Act of 1934

                        Date of Report: September 21, 2000

                               Sauer-Danfoss Inc.
             ------------------------------------------------------
             (Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)

  Delaware                       333-48299                    36-3482074
---------------                 -------------            --------------------
(State or other                 (Commission                (I.R.S. Employer
jurisdiction of                 File Number)              Identification No.)
incorporation)


2800 East 13th Street, Ames, Iowa                                       50010
----------------------------------------                              ---------
(Address of principal executive offices)                              (Zip Code)

Registrants telephone number, including area code:     (515) 239-6000

                             Exhibit Index on Page 3


<PAGE>

                                        2

Item 5.  Other Events.
----------------------

         This Current Report on Form 8-K is being filed for the purpose of
disclosing one press release filed as Exhibit 99.1 hereto and which
is herein incorporated by reference in its entirety.

<PAGE>

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                  EXHIBIT INDEX
<S>                               <C>
Exhibit
  No.             Description
-------           -----------

  99.1            Press Release, dated September 21, 2000

</TABLE>

<PAGE>


                                   SIGNATURES

         Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned hereunto duly authorized.

                               SAUER-DANFOSS INC.

Date: September 25, 2000

                               By: /s/ Kenneth D. McCuskey
                                   -----------------------------
                                   Name:  Kenneth D. McCuskey
                                   Title: Vice President-Finance and Treasurer
#### Clarence J. WAGNER, Appellant, v. BROTHERS TWO INTERNATIONAL, INC., a Florida corporation, Appellee.

No. 71-827.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Oct. 18, 1971.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed.
EXHIBIT 32.1

CONTANGO ORE, INC.

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of
Contango ORE, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2011 (the Report), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Kenneth R. Peak, Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge, that:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                    
|------------------------------------
|Dated: May 16, 2011                 
|                                    
|/s/ KENNETH R. PEAK                 
|Kenneth R. Peak                     
|Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 12.1

COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                         Year ended March 31,

(In thousands)                                      2002           2001          2000          1999          1998
--------------                                   ---------       --------       -------       -------       -------
<S>                                              <C>            <C>             <C>           <C>           <C>
Earnings:
---------
Income (loss) before income taxes                $ (55,944)      $  8,119       $ 3,349       $ 2,939       $ 8,414
Add:
Rent expense representative of interest(1)           3,347          1,725         1,009           522           193
Interest expense net of capitalized interest         6,334          7,551         3,588           640           746
Amortization of debt discount and expense              915            530           204            65            33
Amortization of capitalized interest                    11              4             4             4             1
                                                 ---------       --------       -------       -------       -------
Adjusted Earnings                                $ (45,337)      $ 17,929       $ 8,154       $ 4,147       $ 9,217
                                                 =========       ========       =======       =======       =======

Fixed Charges:
--------------
Rent expense representative of interest(1)       $   3,347       $  1,725       $ 1,009       $   522       $   193
Interest expense net of capitalized interest         6,334          7,551         3,588           640           746
Amortization of debt discount and expense              915            530           204            65            33
Capitalized interest                                   205             21             -             -            79
                                                 ---------       --------       -------       -------       -------
Fixed Charges                                    $  10,801       $  9,827       $ 4,801       $ 1,227       $ 1,051
                                                 =========       ========       =======       =======       =======


Ratio of earnings to fixed charges                  (2)              1.82          1.70          3.38          8.77
                                                 =========       ========       =======       =======       =======

</TABLE>

(1)      Calculated as one-third of rentals, which is considered representative
         of the interest factor.
(2)      Adjusted earnings were not sufficient to cover fixed charges, falling
         short by $56,138 for the year ended March 31, 2002.