Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 169 / Thursday, August 30, 2018 / Notices 44309 

exemption request and the license 

amendment. The exemption met all 

applicable regulatory criteria set forth in 

10 CFR 50.12, 52.7, and section VIII.A.4 

of appendix D to 10 CFR part 52. The 

license amendment was found to be 

acceptable as well. The combined safety 

evaluation is available in ADAMS under 

Accession No. ML18150A160. 

Identical exemption documents 

(except for referenced unit numbers and 

license numbers) were issued to the 

licensee for VEGP Units 3 and 4 (COLs 

NPF–91 and NPF–92). The exemption 

documents for VEGP Units 3 and 4 can 

be found in ADAMS under Accession 

Nos. ML18156A143 and ML18156A144 

respectively. The exemption is 

reproduced (with the exception of 

abbreviated titles and additional 

citations) in Section II of this document. 

The amendment documents for COLs 

NPF–91 and NPF–92 are available in 

ADAMS under Accession Nos. 

ML18156A145 and ML18156A147 

respectively. A summary of the 

amendment documents is provided in 

Section III of this document. 

II. Exemption 

Reproduced below is the exemption 

document issued to VEGP Units 3 and 

Unit 4. It makes reference to the 

combined safety evaluation that 

provides the reasoning for the findings 

made by the NRC (and listed under Item 

1) in order to grant the exemption: 

1. In an application dated December 

20, 2017, SNC requested from the 

Commission an exemption to allow 

departures from Tier 1 information in 

the certified DCD incorporated by 

reference in 10 CFR part 52, appendix 

D, as part of license amendment request 

17–044, ‘‘ITAAC [Inspections, Tests, 

Analysis, and Acceptance Criteria] for 

Pneumatic Testing of VES Air Lines’’ 

For the reasons set forth in Section 3.2 

of the NRC staff’s Safety Evaluation, 

which can be found in ADAMS under 

Accession No.ML18150A160, the 

Commission finds that: 

A. The exemption is authorized by 

law; 

B. the exemption presents no undue 

risk to public health and safety; 

C. the exemption is consistent with 

the common defense and security; 

D. special circumstances are present 

in that the application of the rule in this 

circumstance is not necessary to serve 

the underlying purpose of the rule; 

E. the special circumstances outweigh 

any decrease in safety that may result 

from the reduction in standardization 

caused by the exemption; and 

F. the exemption will not result in a 

significant decrease in the level of safety 

otherwise provided by the design. 

2. Accordingly, SNC is granted an 

exemption from the certified DCD Tier 

1 information, with corresponding 

information in COL Appendix C of the 

Facility Combined License as described 

in the licensee’s request dated December 

20, 2017. This exemption is related to, 

and necessary for the granting of 

License Amendment No. 130 for Unit 3 

and 129 for Unit 4, which is being 

issued concurrently with this 

exemption. 

3. As explained in Section 5.0 of the 

NRC staff’s Safety Evaluation (ADAMS 

Accession No.ML18150A160), this 

exemption meets the eligibility criteria 

for categorical exclusion set forth in 10 

CFR 51.22(c)(9). Therefore, pursuant to 

10 CFR 51.22(b), no environmental 

impact statement or environmental 

assessment needs to be prepared in 

connection with the issuance of the 

exemption. 

4. This exemption is effective as of the 

date of its issuance. 

III. License Amendment Request 

By letter dated December 20, 2017 

(ADAMS Accession No.ML17354A964), 

the licensee requested that the NRC 

amend the COLs for VEGP, Units 3 and 

4, COLs NPF–91 and NPF–92. The 

proposed amendment is described in 

Section I of this Federal Register notice. 

The Commission has determined for 

these amendments that the application 

complies with the standards and 

requirements of the Atomic Energy Act 

of 1954, as amended (the Act), and the 

Commission’s rules and regulations. 

The Commission has made appropriate 

findings as required by the Act and the 

Commission’s rules and regulations in 

10 CFR chapter I, which are set forth in 

the license amendment. 

A notice of consideration of issuance 

of amendment to facility operating 

license or COL, as applicable, proposed 

no significant hazards consideration 

determination, and opportunity for a 

hearing in connection with these 

actions, was published in the Federal 

Register on March 13, 2018 (83 

FR10922). No comments were received 

during the 30-day comment period. 

The Commission has determined that 

these amendments satisfy the criteria for 

categorical exclusion in accordance 

with 10 CFR 51.22. Therefore, pursuant 

to 10 CFR 51.22(b), no environmental 

impact statement or environmental 

assessment need be prepared for these 

amendments. 

IV. Conclusion 

Using the reasons set forth in the 

combined safety evaluation, the staff 

granted the exemption and issued the 

amendment that the licensee requested 

on December 20, 2017. 

The exemption and amendment were 

issued on July 10, 2018, as part of a 

combined package to the licensee 

(ADAMS Accession No. ML18156A141). 

Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 27th day 

of August 2018. 

For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission. 

Jennifer Dixon-Herrity, 

Chief, Licensing Branch 4, Division of 

Licensing, Siting, and Environmental 

Analysis Office of New Reactors. 

[FR Doc. 2018–18846 Filed 8–29–18; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7590–01–P 

OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND 

HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION 

Privacy Act of 1974; System of 

Records 

AGENCY: Occupational Safety and Health 

Review Commission. 

ACTION: Notice of a modified system of 

records. 

SUMMARY: In accordance with the 

Privacy Act of 1974, as amended, the 

Occupational Safety and Health Review 

Commission (OSHRC) is revising the 

notice for Privacy Act system-of-records 

OSHRC–4. 

DATES: Comments must be received by 

OSHRC on or before October 1, 2018. 

The revised system of records will 

become effective on that date, without 

any further notice in the Federal 

Register, unless comments or 

government approval procedures 

necessitate otherwise. 

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments 

by any of the following methods: 

• Email: rbailey@oshrc.gov. Include 

‘‘PRIVACY ACT SYSTEM OF 

RECORDS’’ in the subject line of the 

message. 

• Fax: (202) 606–5417. 

• Mail: One Lafayette Centre, 1120 

20th Street NW, Ninth Floor, 

Washington, DC 20036–3457. 

• Hand Delivery/Courier: Same as 

mailing address. 

Instructions: All submissions must 

include your name, return address, and 

email address, if applicable. Please 

clearly label submissions as ‘‘PRIVACY 

ACT SYSTEM OF RECORDS.’’ 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ron 

Bailey, Attorney-Advisor, Office of the 

General Counsel, via telephone at (202) 

606–5410, or via email at rbailey@

oshrc.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The 

Privacy Act of 1974, 5 U.S.C. 552a(e)(4), 

requires federal agencies such as 

OSHRC to publish in the Federal 


amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with NOTICES1
44310 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 169 / Thursday, August 30, 2018 / Notices 

Register notice of any new or modified 

system of records. No significant 

changes have been made to the 

following system-of-records notice. 

However, the Office of Management and 

Budget in OMB Circular A–108, at p. 11, 

has encouraged agencies not to rely on 

blanket routine uses—uses listed in a 

separate document that apply to all 

systems of records. OSHRC, therefore, 

has revised its notice for OSHRC–6 to 

include a full description of the 

applicable routine uses. This is simply 

a change in format that has not resulted 

in any substantive changes to the 

routine uses for this system of records. 

The notice for OSHRC–6, provided 

below in its entirety, is as follows. 

SYSTEM NAME AND NUMBER 

E-Filing/Case Management System, 

OSHRC–6. 

SECURITY CLASSIFICATION: 

None. 

SYSTEM LOCATION: 

Electronic records are maintained in a 

private cloud within an Oracle 

Database, operated by MicroPact at 

12901 Worldgate Drive, Suite 800, 

Herndon, VA 20170. Paper records are 

maintained by the Office of the 

Executive Secretary, located at 1120 

20th Street NW, Ninth Floor, 

Washington, DC 20036–3457. 

SYSTEM MANAGER(S): 

Supervisory Information Technology 

Specialist (electronic records contained 

in the e-filing/case management system) 

and the Executive Secretary (all other 

records), OSHRC, 1120 20th Street NW, 

Ninth Floor, Washington, DC 20036– 

3457; (202) 606–5100. 

AUTHORITY FOR MAINTENANCE OF THE SYSTEM: 

29 U.S.C. 661. 

PURPOSE(S) OF THE SYSTEM: 

This system of records is maintained 

for the purpose of processing cases that 

are before OSHRC. 

CATEGORIES OF INDIVIDUALS COVERED BY THE

SYSTEM: 

This system of records covers (1) 

ALJs; (2) Commission members and 

their staff; (3) OSHRC employees 

entering data into the e-filing/case 

management system, or assigned 

responsibilities with respect to a 

particular case; and (4) parties, the 

parties’ points of contact, and the 

parties’ representatives in cases that 

have been, or presently are, before 

OSHRC. 

CATEGORIES OF RECORDS IN THE SYSTEM: 

The electronic records contain the 

following information: (1) The names of 

those covered by the system of records 

and, as to parties, their points of 

contact; (2) the telephone and fax 

numbers, business email addresses, 

and/or business street addresses of those 

covered by the system of records; (3) the 

names of OSHRC cases, and information 

associated with the cases, such as the 

inspection number, the docket number, 

the state in which the action arose, the 

names of the representatives, and 

whether the case involved a fatality; (4) 

events occurring in cases and the dates 

on which the events occurred; (5) 

documents filed in cases and the dates 

on which the documents were filed; and 

(6) the names of OSHRC employees 

entering data into the e-filing/case 

management system, or assigned 

responsibilities with respect to a 

particular case. The paper records are 

hard copies of the electronic records in 

the e-filing/case management system. 

RECORD SOURCE CATEGORIES: 

Information in this system is derived 

from the individual to whom it applies 

or is derived from case processing 

records maintained by the Office of the 

Executive Secretary and the Office of 

the General Counsel, or from 

information provided by the parties who 

appear before OSHRC. 

ROUTINE USES OF RECORDS MAINTAINED IN THE

SYSTEM, INCLUDING CATEGORIES OF USERS AND

PURPOSES OF SUCH USES: 

In addition to disclosures generally 

permitted under 5 U.S.C. 552a(b), all or 

a portion of the records or information 

contained in this system of records may 

be disclosed as a routine use pursuant 

to 5 U.S.C. 552a(b)(3) under the 

circumstances or for the purposes 

described below, to the extent such 

disclosures are compatible with the 

purposes for which the information was 

collected: 

(1) To the Department of Justice (DOJ), 

or to a court or adjudicative body before 

which OSHRC is authorized to appear, 

when any of the following entities or 

individuals—(a) OSHRC, or any of its 

components; (b) any employee of 

OSHRC in his or her official capacity; 

(c) any employee of OSHRC in his or her 

individual capacity where DOJ (or 

OSHRC where it is authorized to do so) 

has agreed to represent the employee; or 

(d) the United States, where OSHRC 

determines that litigation is likely to 

affect OSHRC or any of its 

components—is a party to litigation or 

has an interest in such litigation, and 

OSHRC determines that the use of such 

records by DOJ, or by a court or other 

tribunal, or another party before such 

tribunal, is relevant and necessary to the 

litigation. 

(2) To an appropriate agency, whether 

federal, state, local, or foreign, charged 

with investigating or prosecuting a 

violation or enforcing or implementing 

a law, rule, regulation, or order, when 

a record, either on its face or in 

conjunction with other information, 

indicates a violation or potential 

violation of law, which includes civil, 

criminal or regulatory violations, and 

such disclosure is proper and consistent 

with the official duties of the person 

making the disclosure. 

(3) To a federal, state, or local agency 

maintaining civil, criminal or other 

relevant enforcement information, such 

as current licenses, if necessary to 

obtain information relevant to an 

OSHRC decision concerning the hiring, 

appointment, or retention of an 

employee; the issuance, renewal, 

suspension, or revocation of a security 

clearance; the execution of a security or 

suitability investigation; the letting of a 

contract; or the issuance of a license, 

grant or other benefit. 

(4) To a federal, state, or local agency, 

in response to that agency’s request for 

a record, and only to the extent that the 

information is relevant and necessary to 

the requesting agency’s decision in the 

matter, if the record is sought in 

connection with the hiring, 

appointment, or retention of an 

employee; the issuance, renewal, 

suspension, or revocation of a security 

clearance; the execution of a security or 

suitability investigation; the letting of a 

contract; or the issuance of a license, 

grant or other benefit by the requesting 

agency. 

(5) To an authorized appeal grievance 

examiner, formal complaints manager, 

equal employment opportunity 

investigator, arbitrator, or other duly 

authorized official engaged in 

investigation or settlement of a 

grievance, complaint, or appeal filed by 

an employee, only to the extent that the 

information is relevant and necessary to 

the case or matter. 

(6) To OPM in accordance with the 

agency’s responsibilities for evaluation 

and oversight of federal personnel 

management. 

(7) To officers and employees of a 

federal agency for the purpose of 

conducting an audit, but only to the 

extent that the record is relevant and 

necessary to this purpose. 

(8) To OMB in connection with the 

review of private relief legislation at any 

stage of the legislative coordination and 

clearance process, as set forth in 

Circular No. A–19. 

(9) To a Member of Congress or to a 

person on his or her staff acting on the 

Member’s behalf when a written request 

is made on behalf and at the behest of 


amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with NOTICES1
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 169 / Thursday, August 30, 2018 / Notices 44311 

the individual who is the subject of the 

record. 

(10) To the National Archives and 

Records Administration (NARA) for 

records management inspections and 

such other purposes conducted under 

the authority of 44 U.S.C. 2904 and 

2906. 

(11) To appropriate agencies, entities, 

and persons when: (a) OSHRC suspects 

or has confirmed that there has been a 

breach of the system of records; (b) 

OSHRC has determined that as a result 

of the suspected or confirmed breach 

there is a risk of harm to individuals, 

OSHRC, the Federal Government, or 

national security; and (c) the disclosure 

made to such agencies, entities, and 

persons is reasonably necessary to assist 

in connection with OSHRC’s efforts to 

respond to the suspected or confirmed 

breach or to prevent, minimize, or 

remedy such harm. 

(12) To NARA, Office of Government 

Information Services (OGIS), to the 

extent necessary to fulfill its 

responsibilities in 5 U.S.C. 552(h), to 

review administrative agency policies, 

procedures and compliance with FOIA, 

and to facilitate OGIS’ offering of 

mediation services to resolve disputes 

between persons making FOIA requests 

and administrative agencies. 

(13) To another federal agency or 

federal entity, when OSHRC determines 

that information from this system of 

records is reasonably necessary to assist 

the recipient agency or entity in (a) 

responding to a suspected or confirmed 

breach or (b) preventing, minimizing, or 

remedying the risk of harm to 

individuals, the recipient agency or 

entity (including its information 

systems, programs, and operations), the 

Federal Government, or national 

security, resulting from a suspected or 

confirmed breach. 

(14) To a bar association or similar 

federal, state, or local licensing 

authority for a possible disciplinary 

action. 

(15) To vetted MicroPact employees 

in order to ensure that the e-filing/case 

management system is properly 

maintained. 

(16) To the public, in accordance with 

29 U.S.C. 661(g), for the purpose of 

inspecting and/or copying the records at 

OSHRC. 

POLICIES AND PRACTICES FOR STORAGE OF

RECORDS: 

At MicroPact’s secure facility, the 

information is stored in a database 

contained on a separate database server 

behind the application server serving 

the data. Paper records are stored in the 

records room and in file cabinets. 

POLICIES AND PRACTICES FOR RETRIEVAL OF

RECORDS: 

Electronic records contained in the 

case e-filing/case management system 

may be retrieved by any of the data 

items listed under ‘‘Categories of 

Records in the System,’’ including 

docket number, inspection number, any 

part of a representative’s name or the 

case name, and user. Paper records may 

be retrieved manually by docket number 

or case name. 

POLICIES AND PRACTICES FOR RETENTION AND

DISPOSAL OF RECORDS: 

Under Records Disposition Schedule 

N1–455–90–1, paper case files may be 

destroyed 20 years after a case closes. 

Under Records Disposition Schedule 

N1–455–11–2, electronic records 

pertaining to those paper case files may 

be deleted when no longer needed for 

the conduct of current business. 

ADMINISTRATIVE, TECHNICAL, AND PHYSICAL

SAFEGUARDS: 

Electronic records contained in the efiling/case management system are 

safeguarded as follows. Data going 

across the internet is encrypted using 

SSL encryption. Every system is 

password protected. MicroPact, which 

stores the data in a private cloud within 

an Oracle Database, operates its own 

datacenter that is protected by physical 

security measures. Only authorized 

MicroPact employees who have both 

physical key and key card access to the 

datacenter can physically access the 

sites where data is stored. Only 

authorized and vetted MicroPact 

employees have access to the servers 

containing any PII. 

The access of parties and their 

representatives to electronic records in 

the system is limited to active files 

pertaining to cases in which the parties 

are named, or the representatives have 

entered appearances. The access of 

OSHRC employees is limited to 

personnel having a need for access to 

perform their official functions and is 

additionally restricted through 

password identification procedures. 

Paper records are maintained in a 

records room that can only be accessed 

using a smartcard or a key. Some paper 

records are also maintained in file 

cabinets. During duty hours, these 

records are under surveillance of 

personnel charged with their custody, 

and after duty hours, the records are 

secured behind locked doors. Access to 

the cabinets is limited to personnel 

having a need for access to perform their 

official functions. 

RECORD ACCESS PROCEDURES: 

Individuals who wish to gain access 

to their records should notify: Privacy 

Officer, OSHRC, 1120 20th Street NW, 

Ninth Floor, Washington, DC 20036– 

3457. For an explanation on how such 

requests should be drafted, refer to 29 

CFR 2400.6 (procedures for requesting 

records). 

CONTESTING RECORD PROCEDURES: 

Individuals who wish to contest their 

records should notify: Privacy Officer, 

OSHRC, 1120 20th Street NW, Ninth 

Floor, Washington, DC 20036–3457. For 

an explanation on the specific 

procedures for contesting the contents 

of a record, refer to 29 CFR 2400.8 

(Procedures for requesting amendment), 

and 29 CFR 2400.9 (Procedures for 

appealing). 

NOTIFICATION PROCEDURES: 

Individuals interested in inquiring 

about their records should notify: 

Privacy Officer, OSHRC, 1120 20th 

Street NW, Ninth Floor, Washington, DC 

20036–3457. For an explanation on how 

such requests should be drafted, refer to 

29 CFR 2400.5 (notification), and 29 

CFR 2400.6 (procedures for requesting 

records). 

EXEMPTIONS PROMULGATED FOR THE SYSTEM: 

None. 

HISTORY: 

July 7, 2016, 81 FR 44335; and 

September 28, 2017, 82 FR 45324. 

Dated: August 23, 2018. 

Nadine N. Mancini, 

General Counsel, Senior Agency Official for 

Privacy. 

[FR Doc. 2018–18786 Filed 8–29–18; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7600–01–P 

POSTAL REGULATORY COMMISSION 

[Docket Nos. MC2018–213 and CP2018–295; 

MC2018–214 and CP2018–296] 

New Postal Products 

AGENCY: Postal Regulatory Commission. 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: The Commission is noticing a 

recent Postal Service filing for the 

Commission’s consideration concerning 

negotiated service agreements. This 

notice informs the public of the filing, 

invites public comment, and takes other 

administrative steps. 

DATES: Comments are due: September 4, 

2018. 

ADDRESSES: Submit comments 

electronically via the Commission’s 

Filing Online system at http://

www.prc.gov. Those who cannot submit 

comments electronically should contact 

the person identified in the FOR FURTHER


amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with NOTICES1