alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit      21**

**SUBSIDIARIES      OF THE REGISTRANT**

| Subsidiary                                           |   | Jurisdiction                of Organization |
|------------------------------------------------------|--------|---------------------------------------------|
|                                                 |   |                                        |
|                                                 |   |                                        |
|                                                 |   |                                        |
| Brea                Power Partners, LP               |   | Delaware                                    |
|                                                 |   |                                        |
| Ridgewood                Olinda, LLC                 |   | Delaware                                    |
|                                                 |   |                                        |
| Ridgewood                Rhode Island Generation LLC |   | Delaware                                    |
|                                                 |   |                                        |
| Stillwater                Hydro Partners, LP         |   | Delaware                                    |
|                                                 |   |                                        |

----
----

Prior notification of a concentration

(Case COMP/M.3675 — Citigroup/Baltisches Haus/UAB Palink/JV)

Candidate case for simplified procedure

(2005/C 18/03)

(Text with EEA relevance)

----

(1)OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

(2)  Available on DG COMP website:

http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/legislation/consultation/simplified_tru.pdf.

----
Larson Allen SM


                          CPAs, Consultants & Advisors
                              www.larsonallen.com


                        INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS' CONSENT




To the Board of Directors and Shareholders
FSF Financial Corp. & Subsidiaries
Hutchinson, Minnesota 55350

We consent to the use of our report  dated  October  26,  2002,  relating to the
consolidated  balance  sheet  of FSF  Financial  Corp.  and  Subsidiaries  as of
September  30,  2002  and  the  related   consolidated   statements  of  income,
comprehensive  income,  changes in stockholders' equity, and cash flows for each
of the two fiscal years in the period  ended  September  30, 2002,  which report
appears in the Company's September 30, 2003 Form 10-K filed with the SEC.


/s/Larson, Allen, Weishair & Co., LLP

Larson, Allen, Weishair & Co., LLP
Austin, Minnesota
December 18, 2003
# C_2015402EN.01000501.xml

| 4.12.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 402/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.12.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 402/5

---

Opinion of the Advisory Committee on restrictive agreements and dominant position at its meeting on 22 June 2015 concerning a preliminary draft decision relating to the Case AT.39563(2) — Retail Food Packaging

Rapporteur: Netherlands

(2015/C 402/06)

| 1. | The Advisory Committee agrees with the Commission on the determination of the value of sales. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The Advisory Committee agrees with the Commission on the determination of the value of sales.

| 2. | The Advisory Committee agrees with the Commission on the periods to be taken into account for imposing the fines. |
| --- | --- |

2.

The Advisory Committee agrees with the Commission on the periods to be taken into account for imposing the fines.

| 3. | The Advisory Committee agrees with the Commission on the basic amounts of the fines. |
| --- | --- |

3.

The Advisory Committee agrees with the Commission on the basic amounts of the fines.

| 4. | The Advisory Committee agrees with the Commission’s assessment on the mitigating circumstances and ad hoc reductions applicable in this case. |
| --- | --- |

4.

The Advisory Committee agrees with the Commission’s assessment on the mitigating circumstances and ad hoc reductions applicable in this case.

| 5. | The Advisory Committee agrees with the Commission on the reduction of fines based on the 2006 Leniency Notice. |
| --- | --- |

5.

The Advisory Committee agrees with the Commission on the reduction of fines based on the 2006 Leniency Notice.

| 6. | The Advisory Committee agrees with the Commission’s assessment of the inability to pay request. |
| --- | --- |

6.

The Advisory Committee agrees with the Commission’s assessment of the inability to pay request.

| 7. | The Advisory Committee agrees with the Commission on the final amounts of the fines. |
| --- | --- |

7.

The Advisory Committee agrees with the Commission on the final amounts of the fines.

| 8. | The Advisory Committee recommends the publication of its opinion in the Official Journal of the European Union. |
| --- | --- |

8.

The Advisory Committee recommends the publication of its opinion in the Official Journal of the European Union.

Official Journal of the European Union

---
Exhibit 3.1.2

ARTICLES OF AMENDMENT
TO
THE 1999 RESTATED ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION OF
MEDICALOGIC/MEDSCAPE, INC.
(f/k/a MedicaLogic, Inc.)

1.  The
name of the Corporation is MedicaLogic/Medscape, Inc.

2.  The
1999 Restated Articles of Incorporation of the Corporation, as amended, are amended to add a new Article II.D to the end of Article II to read in
its entirety as follows:



---



2

---



3

---



4

---



5

---



6

---



7

---



8

---



9

---



10

---



11

---



12

---



13

---



3.  The
amendment to the Articles was approved by the Board of Directors of the Corporation on December  , 2000. Shareholder approval was not required.

Dated:
December  th, 2000.

| |  | MEDICALOGIC/MEDSCAPE, INC.
| |  | --------------------------
| |  | By:                       

14

---
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended, notice is hereby given of a meeting.

The meetings will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering Special Emphasis Panel, NIBIB Team-based R25 Review (2019/01).                    

*Date:*                         September 24, 2018.                    

*Time:*                         10:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         National Institutes of Health, National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering, 6707 Democracy Blvd., Suite 920, Bethesda, MD 20892 (Virtual Meeting).                    

*Contact Person:*                         Ruixia Zhou, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering, National Institutes of Health, 6707 Democracy Blvd., Suite 957, Bethesda, MD 20892, 301-496-4773,                         *zhour@mail@nih.gov.*

Dated: August 23, 2018.

David D. Clary,

Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2018-18769 Filed 8-29-18; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CO-PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND PRINCIPAL

FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Each of the undersigned hereby certifies, in accordance with 18 U.S.C. 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, in his capacity as an officer of American Technology Corporation (the Company), that, to his knowledge, the Annual Report of the Company on Form 10-K for the
fiscal year ended September 30, 2007 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (except as to the due date for filing) and that the information contained in such report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company as of the dates and for the periods presented in the financial statements included in such report.

Dated: January 4, 2008



|                                                   
|---------------------------------------------------
|/s/    THOMAS R.
BROWN                             
|Thomas R. Brown, President, Chief Executive Officer
|(Principal Executive Officer)                      
|                                                   
|/s/    KATHERINE H.
MCDERMOTT                      
|Katherine H. McDermott Chief Financial Officer     
|(Principal Financial Officer)                      

This certification accompanies the Form 10-K to which it relates, is not deemed filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of American Technology Corporation under the Securities Act of 1934, as amended (whether made before or after the date of the Form 10-K), irrespective of
any general incorporation language contained in such filing.
V

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 3922

To authorize the Secretary of Transportation to issue a certificate of documentation with appropriate endorsement for employment in the coastwise

trade for each of the vessels SHAMROCK V and ENDEAVOUR.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

FEBRUARY 28, 1994

Mr. MACHTLEY introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Merchant Marine and Fisheries

A BILL

To authorize the Secretary of Transportation to issue a

certificate of documentation with appropriate endorsement for employment in the coastwise trade for each

of the vessels SHAMROCK V and ENDEAVOUR.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That notwithstanding section 27 of the Merchant Marine

4 Act, 1920 (46 App. U.S.C. 883), the Act of June 19, 1886

5 (46 App. U.S.C. 289), and section 12106 of title 46, Unit6 ed States Code, the Secretary of Transportation may issue

7 a certificate of documentation with appropriate endorse8 ment for employment in the coastwise trade for each of—
2

•HR 3922 IH

1 (1) the vessel SHAMROCK V (United States

2 official number 900936); and

3 (2) the vessel ENDEAVOUR (United States of4 ficial number 947869).

Æ
## Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas

J U D G M E N T

Benjamin Robert Cain

, III, Appellant

No. 06

- 15

- 00222

- CR v.

The State of Texas, Appellee Appeal from the 71st District Court of Harrison County, Texas (Tr. Ct. No. 13

- 0257X ). Opinion delivered by Chief Justice Morriss, Justice Moseley and Justice Burgess participating.

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find no error in the judgment of the court

below

. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.

We note that the appellant, Benjamin Robert Cain

, III, has adequately indicated his
inability to pay costs of appeal. Therefore, we waive payment of costs.

RENDERED AUGUST 18, 2016 BY ORDER OF THE COURT JOSH R. MORRISS, III CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST: Debra K. Autrey, Clerk
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.2



                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Paxson Communications Corporation
(the "Company") on Form 10-K for the year ending December 31, 2002 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Lowell W. Paxson, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

/s/ Lowell W. Paxson
--------------------
Lowell W. Paxson
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)
Dated March 28, 2003


A signed original of this written statement has been provided to Paxson
Communications Corporation and will be retained by Paxson Communications
Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
upon request.
#### Winfred JONES, as surviving husband of Joan Jones, and Winfred Jones, individually, Appellant, v. Leroy SMITH et al., Appellees.

No. 72-183.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

June 20, 1973.

Rehearing Denied July 6, 1973.

Theodore Babbitt, of Phillips & Babbitt, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

John R. Beranek, of Jones, Paine & Foster, West Palm Beach, for appellees, General Tire & Rubber Co. d/b/a General Tire Service and Liberty Mutual Ins. Co.

PER CURIAM.

The issue is whether or not the trial court erred in granting a motion for directed verdict against the plaintiff and in favor of defendant General Tire & Rubber Company and its insurance carrier Liberty Mutual Insurance Company in a personal injury and wrongful death action brought by the plaintiff as a result of an unfortunate highway accident.

Factually the plaintiff’s theory was that General Tire & Rubber Company was negligent in underinflating a tire on a vehicle driven by one Smith — also a defendant. As a result, the tire blew out, causing Smith’s vehicle to hit plaintiff’s vehicle resulting in injuries to plaintiff and death to his wife. The parties have ábly briefed and argued the issue and there is very little we can add to their presentation except to say that in our opinion the issue of General Tire’s negligence should have been left to the jury.

The cause of the tire failure according to the plaintiff’s expert was excessive bending along the side wall of the tire. The essential fact to be established in support of plaintiff’s case was that the bending was caused by the conduct of General Tire rather than some other agency for which General Tire was not responsible. The circumstantial evidence presented by the plaintiff permits a reasonable inference that the bending was the result of the defendant’s underinflation of the tire when defendant sold it to Smith about 30 days before the accident. While the same evi*344dence might be susceptible of other reasonable inferences which do not support the plaintiff’s negligence claim against General Tire, where the circumstances established by the evidence are susceptible of a reasonable inference which would authorize recovery, and are also susceptible of a reasonable inference to the contrary, a jury question is presented. Voelker v. Combined Ins. Co. of America, Fla.1954, 73 So.2d 403, 406; Shepherd v. Finer Foods, Inc., Fla.1964, 165 So.2d 750, 754, and Scott v. Midyette-Moor, Inc., Fla.App.1969, 221 So.2d 178, 181.

For the foregoing reasons, the judgment for General Tire & Rubber Company is reversed and the cause remanded for further proceedings.

REED, C. J., and OWEN and MAGER, JJ., concur.
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk's Office, Atlanta, January 17, 2020. I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written. , Clerk. 

# Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA, January 17, 2020 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order A20D0234. KELLY J. CROISSANT v. MONA N. CROISSANT.
Upon consideration of the Application for Discretionary Appeal, it is ordered that it be hereby GRANTED. The Appellant may file a Notice of Appeal within 10 days of the date of this order. The Clerk of Superior Court is directed to include a copy of this order in the record transmitted to the Court of Appeals.
LC NUMBERS: 11V177
F 12.31.2013 Exhibit 10-G-2






Exhibit 10-G-2


Amendment to Description of Director Compensation as of July 1, 2013


On July 11, 2013, the Board of Directors approved an increase in the Presiding Director, Audit Committee chair, and Compensation Committee chair fees.
Specifically, the Board approved:
		
	•
	An increase in the annual Presiding Director fee to $30,000 from $25,000.




		
	•
	An increase in the annual Audit Committee and Compensation Committee chair fees to $25,000 from $15,000.




A review of director compensation at companies similarly situated to Ford indicated that the Audit Committee and Compensation Committee chair fees were below competitive levels.  The Presiding Director fee was increased in recognition of the increased responsibilities of that position.  The Board approved the additional compensation for the Audit Committee and Compensation Committee chairs and the Presiding Director as shown above and considers the fees to be reasonably competitive with leading companies.
# C_2013256EN.01000102.xml

| 5.9.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 256/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.9.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 256/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.6997 — TowerBrook Capital/Metallum)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2013/C 256/02

On 22 August 2013, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32013M6997. EUR-Lex is the online access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32013M6997. EUR-Lex is the online access to the European law.

---
I

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 3781

To amend the Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act of 1991

to eliminate funding for highway demonstration projects.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

FEBRUARY 2, 1994

Mr. INGLIS of South Carolina introduced the following bill; which was referred

to the Committee on Public Works and Transportation

A BILL

To amend the Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency

Act of 1991 to eliminate funding for highway demonstration projects.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.

4 Sections 1103(b), 1104(b), 1105(f), 1106(a)(2),

5 1106(b)(2), 1107(b), and 1108(b) of the Intermodal Sur6 face Transportation Efficiency Act of 1991 (105 Stat.

7 2027–2063) are each amended by striking ‘‘through

8 1997’’ and inserting ‘‘through 1993’’.
2

•HR 3781 IH

1 SEC. 2. ALLOCATION PERCENTAGES.

2 Sections 1103(c), 1104(c), 1105(g)(2), 1106(a)(3),

3 1106(b)(3), 1107(c), and 1108(c) of the Intermodal Sur4 face Transportation Efficiency Act of 1991 (105 Stat.

5 2028–2063) are each amended by striking ‘‘, 1994, 1995,

6 1996, and 1997’’.

Æ
Exhibit 32





Certification of Principal Executive and Financial Officer


Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to


Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of LJM Energy Corp. a Nevada corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), Joel Felix, Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certifies to the best of his knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to LJM Energy Corp., and will be retained by LJM Energy Corp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





/s/ Joel FelixJoel FelixPrincipal Executive Officer, Principal Financial OfficerMay 13, 2011
<PAGE>



                                  EXHIBIT 21.2

             CONSENT OF BERENFELD, SPRITZER, SHECHTER & SHEER, CPA'S



<PAGE>


CONSENT OF FORMER INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANT



Intelilabs.com, Inc.
Water Gardens 1620 26th Street
3rd Floor Santa Monica, CA 90404

I hereby consent to the use in Intelilabs.com's Form 10-KSB, of our report
dated August 31, 1999, relating to the financial statements of Quentin Road
Productions, Inc. (now known as Intelilabs.com, Inc.).



Berenfeld Spritzer Shechter & Sheer
CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

Miami, Florida
September 26, 2000
<PAGE>


                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.4

                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

The Board of Directors
24/7 Media, Inc.:

         We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration
statement on Form S-3 of 24/7 Media, Inc. of our report dated March 14, 2000,
relating to the consolidated balance sheets of the media divisions of IMAKE
Software & Services, Inc. and IMAKE Consulting, Inc. as of December 31, 1999 and
1998, and the related consolidated statements of operations, division equity
(deficit) and cash flows for the years then ended, and to the reference to our
firm under the heading "Experts" in the registration statement.



                                 /s/ KPMG LLP
                             --------------------------
                                     KPMG LLP


McLean, Virginia
September 26, 2000