alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.2



Certification of CFO Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350



Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned certifies that (1) this Quarterly Report of HCBF Holding
Company, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2017, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (this “Report”), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and (2) the information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition of the Company and its results of operations as of and for the periods covered therein.



|/s/ Randall A. Ezell         | 
|---------------------------- | 
|Randall A. Ezell             | 
|Executive Vice President and | 
|Chief Financial Officer      | 



Date: August 11, 2017



A signed original of this written statement
required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed
form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will
be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit      32

|   | (1) | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   |                                                                                                                                                |                                               |
|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------|
|        |                                                                                                                                                | /s/ Rodney              I.              Smith |
|   | Rodney                I. SmithChief                  Executive Officer and President(principal                  executive                  officer) |

|   |                                                                                                                                                     |                                               |
|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------|
|        |                                                                                                                                                | /s/ Wesley              A              Taylor |
|   | Wesley                A. TaylorVP                  of Administration, Secretary, Treasurer, and Director(principal                    financial officer) |
|   |                                                                                                                                                     |
|   | Dated:                April 14, 2008                                                                                                                     |

----
#### Cleveland Larry JENKINS, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 67-409.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Third District.

March 19, 1968.

Robert L. Koeppel, Public Defender, and Edward J. Winter, Jr., Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.

Earl Faircloth, Atty. Gen., and Harold Mendelow, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

Before CHARLES CARROLL, C. J., and PEARSON and HENDRY, JJ.

*277PER CURIAM.

The appellant was found guilty after a non-jury trial on two separate informations. The first charged larceny of a truck and the second charged robbery. He was sentenced to ten years imprisonment on the robbery count and three years on the count for larceny of the truck. The trial judge ordered that the three year sentence run concurrently with the ten year term.

On this appeal the appellant raises four points. The first urges the insufficiency of the evidence as to larceny. The second urges prejudice because the court failed to tender the attorney for appellant the opportunity for closing argument. The third point urges an error upon the court’s denial of appellant’s motion for a mistrial. The fourth point argues the sufficiency of the evidence in its entirety.

The main thrust of appellant’s first point is that the evidence is insufficient as to the identity of the defendant. A review of the record establishes that the defendant was positively identified by an eyewitness who had an adequate opportunity to observe the appellant. No error is shown. See State v. Sebastian, Fla.1965, 171 So.2d 893.

Appellant’s second point does not present reversible error because there was no request for closing argument at the time of the trial. Willoughby v. State, Fla.App. 1967, 203 So.2d 10. Cf. State v. Jones, Fla. 1967, 204 So.2d 515.

The basis of appellant’s third point is that a fingerprint card, admitted into evidence in this non-jury trial, showed a prior criminal record of the appellant. A police technician testified he had taken the prints prior to the commission of the offense for which the appellant was being tried. There is no question but that the evidence was relevant and was admissible under the rule laid down in Williams v. State, Fla.1959, 110 So.2d 654. The only question is whether or not the showing in this non-jury trial that the appellant had a previous criminal record was a basis for a mistrial. It is clear that the admission of the card as a standard for comparison of other fingerprint evidence was not such as to render the trial basically unfair. See also Kelly v. State, 145 Fla. 491, 199 So. 764 (1941); Talley v. State, 160 Fla. 593, 36 So.2d 201 (1948); Urga v. State, Fla.App.1963, 155 So.2d 719.

Appellant’s fourth point is likewise without merit.

Affirmed.
|   | EXHIBIT 32.2 |   |
|--------|--------------|--------|

|   | Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as AdoptedPursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |   |
|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|

| Solely for purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, the undersigned, Vice President, Acting Chief Financial Officer, Principal FinancialOfficer and Principal Accounting Officer of Louisiana Food Company (the “Company”), hereby certify that: |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (1) | The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, for the quarter ended May 31, 2011 (the “Report”), fully complies withthe requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|-----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Company. |
|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date: May 23, 2011. | LOUISIANA FOOD COMPANY |   |
|---------------------|------------------------|--------|

| By: | /s/ WADDELL D. LOFLIN |   |
|-----|-----------------------|--------|

|   | Waddell D. Loflin, Vice President, Acting Chief FinancialOfficer, Principal Financial Officer and Principal AccountingOfficer |
|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Louisiana Food Company andwill be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
EX-10.10



 Exhibit 10.10 

FIRST AMENDMENT TO CATTLE PURCHASE AND SALE AGREEMENT 

THIS FIRST AMENDMENT TO CATTLE PURCHASE AND SALE AGREEMENT (“First Amendment,”) is made and entered into as of
September 22, 2010 by and between JBS USA, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (formerly known as JBS USA, Inc.) (“JBS”) and J & F Oklahoma Holdings Inc., a Delaware corporation
(“J & F”). 
 RECITALS 

 

	A.	JBS and J & F have entered into the Cattle Purchase and Sale Agreement dated as of October 23, 2008 (the “Agreement”); and 


 

	B.	JBS and J & F desire to amend the Agreement to extend the term past September 10, 2016. 


NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing and the mutual covenants and agreement contained herein, the receipt and sufficiency of
which are hereby acknowledged, the parties hereby agree as follows: 
 a. Section 10 of the Agreement is amended by deleting “December 31,
2011” in the first sentence thereof and replacing it with “December 31, 2016.” 
 b. Other than as set forth in this First Amendment, all
provisions of the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect. 
 c. The Agreement, as amended by this First Amendment, constitutes the entire agreement
of the parties with respect to the matters set forth in the Agreement, as amended by this First Amendment and supersede any prior understanding or agreement, oral or written, with respect to such matters. 

d. This First Amendment may be executed in counterparts, each of which will be deemed an original but all of which together will constitute one and the same
instrument. 
 e. This First Amendment shall be governed and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Colorado without giving effect to any
choice or conflict of laws rule or provision that would cause the application of the domestic substantive laws of any other jurisdiction. 

[Signature page follows.] 







 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, J & F and JBS have executed this First Amendment to the Agreement as of
the date first written above. 
  

			
	J & F:
	
	 J & F Oklahoma Holdings Inc., a Delaware

corporation

		
	By:	 	 /s/ J. Tom Brink

	Name:	 	J. Tom Brink
	Its:	 	President & COO
	
	JBS:
	
	JBS USA LLC, a Delaware limited liability company
		
	By:	 	 /s/ Wesley Mendonça Batista

	Name:	 	  

	Its:
#### WEBSTER OUTDOOR ADVERTISING COMPANY, Appellant, v. CITY OF MIAMI, a Municipal Corporation and Dade County, a Political Subdivision of the State of Florida, Appellees.

No. 72-18.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Feb. 11, 1972.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed.
```
**EXHIBIT 32.2

                           CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL
                          FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT BY
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

         In connection with this Annual Report of BMB Munai, Inc,, on Form
10-KSB for the period ended March 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned, Sanat
Kasymov, Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certifies, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13
                  (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and result of
                  operations of the Company.

Date: June 28, 2006                                  /s/ Sanat Kasymov          
                                                     Sanat Kasymov,
                                                     Principal Financial Officer
```
EXHIBIT 32 
Section 1350 Certifications  STATEMENT FURNISHED PURSUANT TO 
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 The undersigned are the Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer of Dinello Restaurant Ventures, Inc. This Certification is made pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. This Certification accompanies the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Dinello Restaurant Ventures, Inc. for the three months ended March 31, 2011. The undersigned certifies that such 10-Q Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in such 10-Q Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Dinello Restaurant Ventures, Inc. as of March 31, 2011.  This Certification is executed as of May 16, 2011. DINELLO RESTAURANT VENTURES, INC. By:/s/JOHN PAQUETTEJohn Paquette
President and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)  By:/s/DIANE J. HARRISONDiane J. Harrison
Secretary, Treasurer, Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer)  A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Dinello Restaurant Ventures, Inc. and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
EXHIBIT 23.1

            CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the  incorporation by reference in the Registration  Statements on
Form S-8 (Nos. 333-48364, 333-38420, 333-31696, 333-93117, 333-92327, 333-11294,
333-88421,  333-39553,  333-106742 and  333-118776) of our report dated February
20, 2004 (with  respect to Note 17,  March 1, 2004,  with respect to the reverse
stock split,  April 5, 2004, with respect to the disposal of the Medical Systems
division on April 19, 2004 and  reclassified  from  continuing  to  discontinued
operations) on our audits of the  consolidated  financial  statements of Applied
Digital  Solutions,  Inc. and  subsidiaries as of December 31, 2003 and 2002 and
for each of the years in the  two-year  period  ended  December  31,  2003,  and
related  financial  statement  schedules  included in the Annual  Report on Form
10-K, as amended.

Eisner LLP

New York, New York
September 22, 2004
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Denali Commission","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.denali.gov","author_name":"rdata","author_url":"https:\/\/www.denali.gov\/author\/rdata\/","title":"Freedom of Information Act","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"gr72JzlhZE\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.denali.gov\/freedom-of-information-act\/\">Freedom of Information Act<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.denali.gov\/freedom-of-information-act\/embed\/#?secret=gr72JzlhZE\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Freedom of Information Act” — Denali Commission\" data-secret=\"gr72JzlhZE\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n"}
Exhibit 32.1   CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Quarterly Report of Dethrone Royalty Holdings, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended January 31, 2013 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Toby McBride, Chief Executive and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:  1. The Report fully complies with requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.   Dated: March 18, 2013  /s/ Toby McBride Toby McBride Title: Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
I

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 4109

To prohibit contingency fees in lobbying.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 22, 1994

Mr. SCHUMER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on the Judiciary

A BILL

To prohibit contingency fees in lobbying.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Contingency Fees in

5 Lobbying Prohibition Act’’.

6 SEC. 2. CONTINGENCY FEES IN LOBBYING.

7 (a) FINDING AND DECLARATION.—The Congress

8 finds that the conduct prohibited by subsection (c) is inim9 ical to the public interest in protecting against the undue

10 influence of overly aggressive lobbying on Government of11 ficials and that this section may, under the Constitution,
2

•HR 4109 IH

1 appropriately be applied with respect to fees collected or

2 billed on or after March 1, 1994.

3 (b) GOVERNMENT ENTITY DEFINED.—For purposes

4 of this section, the term ‘‘Government entity’’ means an

5 entity in the executive branch, legislative branch, or judi6 cial branch or a member, officer, or employee of any such

7 entity.

8 (c) PROHIBITION.—

9 (1) IN GENERAL.—A person shall not make, di10 rectly or indirectly, on behalf of any person other

11 than the United States, an oral or written commu12 nication to a Government entity, with intent to influ13 ence the Government entity with respect to an event

14 described in paragraph (2), for a fee or other com15 pensation the payment of any part of which is con16 tingent on the occurrence of that event.

17 (2) EVENTS ATTEMPTED TO BE INFLU18 ENCED.—An event is described in this paragraph if

19 it is—

20 (A) the taking of an action by Congress,

21 including an action by either House of Congress

22 or any committee or Member of Congress; or

23 (B) the making or entering into of or de24 nial of an award, grant, financial assistance, or

25 contract by a Government entity.
3

•HR 4109 IH

1 (3) RULE OF CONSTRUCTION.—Paragraph (1)

2 shall not be construed as prohibiting a communica3 tion for a contingent fee relating to a claim for col4 lection of an amount that a client alleges is owed by

5 the Government under a contract or by reason of

6 any other form of obligation.

7 (d) CIVIL ACTION FOR DISGORGEMENT OF FEE.—

8 (1) IN GENERAL.—A person who has paid a

9 contingent fee or other compensation charged in vio10 lation of subsection (c) may bring an action in the

11 appropriate United States district court to recover

12 the amount paid and costs of suit, including a rea13 sonable attorney’s fee.

14 (2) LIMITATION.—A civil action under para15 graph (1) shall be barred unless the action is com16 menced not later than 6 years after the later of—

17 ‘‘(A) the date on which the prohibited con18 duct occurred; or

19 ‘‘(B) the date on which the United States

20 became or reasonably should have become

21 aware that the prohibited conduct occurred.

22 (e) APPLICATION OF SECTION.—The prohibition of

23 subsection (a) shall apply to fees collected or billed on or

24 after March 1, 1994.

Æ
**UN PUBLISHED** 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 16**  **- 1209** 

LOUISE BIGGERS , Plaintiff

– Appellant ,

v. JOHN G. STUMPF, doing business as Chairman, President and CEO, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.; SAMUEL I. WHITE , Defendants

- Appellees

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia , at Richmond

. John A. Gibney, Jr. , District Judge. ( 3:15

- cv
- 00682

- JAG )

Submitted : June 30, 2016 Decided: October 3, 2016

Before KING and SHEDD , Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion

.

Louise Biggers, Appellant Pro Se. Terry Catherine Frank, KAUFMAN & CANOLES, PC, Richmond, Virginia; Christy Lee Murphy, Hunter Wilmer Sims, Jr., KAUFMAN & CANOLES, PC, Norfolk, Virginia; Benjamin Alexander Wills, KAUFMAN & CANOLES, PC, Newport News, Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Louise Bigge rs appeals the district court ’ s order dismissing her complaint seeking to enjoin the foreclosure of

her home . We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis
and dismiss the appeal for the reasons stated by the district

court. Biggers v. Stumpf , No. 3:15

- cv
- 00682

- JAG (E.D. Va.

Feb. 3, 2016) . We dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before th is court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

DISMISSED