alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 3942

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to exclude strike benefits

from gross income.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 2, 1994

Mr. APPLEGATE introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Ways and Means

A BILL

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to exclude

strike benefits from gross income.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. EXCLUSION OF STRIKE BENEFITS.

4 (a) GENERAL RULE.—Part III of subchapter B of

5 chapter 1 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating

6 to items specifically excluded from gross income) is

7 amended by redesignating section 137 as section 138 and

8 by inserting after section 136 the following new section:
2

•HR 3942 IH

1 ‘‘SEC. 137. STRIKE BENEFITS.

2 ‘‘(a) GENERAL RULE.—Gross income does not in3 clude any strike benefit.

4 ‘‘(b) STRIKE BENEFIT.—For purposes of subsection

5 (a), the term ‘strike benefit’ means any payment to an

6 individual if—

7 ‘‘(1) such payment is made on account of such

8 individual being on strike or prevented from working

9 because of a lockout or other labor dispute, and

10 ‘‘(2) such payment is from a fund established

11 by a labor organization.’’

12 (b) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections

13 for part III of subchapter B of chapter 1 of such Code

14 is amended by striking the item relating to section 137

15 and inserting the following:

‘‘Sec. 137. Strike benefits.

‘‘Sec. 138. Cross references to other Acts.’’

16 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by

17 this section shall apply to payments received after Decem18 ber 31, 1993.

Æ
Exhibit 32.1


                          CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND
                          CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                          PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

      In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q
      of Big Time Acquisition,Inc. for the quarter ending November 29,
      2010, I, Scot A. Scheer, CEO and CFO of Big Time Acquisition
      hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
      pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to
      the best of my knowledge and belief, that:

           1.  Such quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending
               November 29, 2010, fully complies with the requirements
               of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
               of 1934; and

           2.  The information contained in such quarterly Report on
               Form 10-Q for the quarter ended <November 29, 2010>,
               fairly represents in all material respects, the
               financial condition and results of operations of
               Big Time Acquisition, Inc.

     Dated:  January 19, 2011



     Big Time Acquisition, Inc.

     By: /s/ Scot A. Scheer
         -------------------
          CEO and CFO
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the quarterly report of OverNear, Inc., (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2012 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Fred E. Tannous, Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer) and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) of the Company, hereby certify as of the date hereof, solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code, that to the best of my knowledge:





(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company at the dates and for the periods indicated.





August 20, 2012
/s/ Fred E. TannousFred E. Tannous

Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)

and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial and

Accounting Officer)





[A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.]
# C_2013285EN.01000101.xml

| 1.10.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 285/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.10.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 285/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.7014 — Marubeni/NPIH)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2013/C 285/01

On 24 September 2013, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32013M7014. EUR-Lex is the online access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32013M7014. EUR-Lex is the online access to the European law.

---
Exhibit 4.4

Translation for information purpose only

CREDIT AGRICOLE INDOSUEZ

Financing
Management
Financing Projects Department

To EURO DISNEY SCABP 100
77777 MARNE LA VALLEE

For
the attention of Mr SPEED

October 31,
2003

Re:
Waiver request

Dear
Sirs,

As
Agent of the Phase IB Banks and Partners, we are pleased, to inform you that the Majority of the Banks part of the amended FRF 2,9 billion Credit Agreement dated
March 25, 1991 and the Majority of the Lenders part of the amended FRF 800 billion Advances Agreement dated March 25, 1991 have decided to approve your waiver request dated
October 17, 2003.

Yours
faithfully,

Xavier
Monteau                                        
                                          
                                          
                    David Rigaud

---

QuickLinks
**Exhibit
      32.1**










**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Annual Report of Applied Digital Solutions, Inc. (the
“Company”) on Form 10-K/A for the year ending December 31, 2006 as filed with
      the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,
      Michael E. Krawitz, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
      to
      18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
      2002, that:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.














/s/
      Michael E. Krawitz


Michael
      E. Krawitz


Chief
      Executive Officer


April
      6,
      2007








A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      Applied Digital Solutions, Inc. and will be retained by Applied Digital
      Solutions, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
      its
      staff upon request.
#### William E. ANDERSON v. STATE of Mississippi.

No. 47703.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

Feb. 18, 1974.

Pittman, Pittman & Pittman, Jon Mark Weathers, Hattiesburg, for appellant.

A. F. Summer, Atty. Gen. by Billy L. Gore, Sp. Asst. Atty. Gen., Jackson, for ap-pellee.

GILLESPIE, Chief Justice:

Defendant appeals from a judgment of the Circuit Court of Forrest County convicting him of burglary with a sentence of imprisonment in the penitentiary for ten years.

Viewed in the light most favorable to the state, we find that the evidence failed to show that defendant was guilty of any greater crime than trespass. Detailing the evidence would serve no useful purpose since a case with this unique set of circumstances is not likely to arise again. It is sufficient to say that the proof does show conclusively that defendant was guilty of trespass. The conviction of burglary is reversed, and defendant is discharged on that charge.

Trespass is necessarily a component of every burglary. Implicit in the verdict finding defendant guilty of burgla*629ry is the finding that he was guilty of the constituent offense of trespass, Section 97-17-87, Mississippi Code Annotated (1972). Inasmuch as the jury has found the defendant guilty of the greater crime, and the evidence of defendant’s guilt of trespass is conclusive, the judgment is affirmed as a conviction of trespass, and the case is remanded for sentencing on that charge. *See*Washington v. State, 222 Miss. 782, 77 So.2d 260 (1955).

Reversed in part, affirmed in part, and remanded for sentence.

SMITH, ROBERTSON, WALKER and BROOM, JJ., concur.
#### PORT SEWALL REALTY CO., Petitioner, v. Robert C. CHRISTIE, Respondent.

No. 40660.

Supreme Court of Florida.

March 4, 1971.

Rehearing Denied March 30, 1971.

Certiorari denied. 241 So.2d 879.

ERVIN, Acting C. J., and CARLTON, ADKINS, BOYD and McCAIN, JJ., concur.
#### Harry Alexander SHISHMAN, a/k/a Harry Alexander Manian, Appellant, v. Gunilla SHISHMAN, a/k/a Gunilla Manian, Appellee.

No. 73-255.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Sept. 18, 1973.

Rehearing Denied Dec. 11, 1973.

Richard H. W. Maloy, Coral Gables, for appellant.

Richard G. Payne, Key West, for appel-lee.

Before BARKDULL, C. J., and PEARSON and HENDRY, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Stamm v. Stamm, Fla.App.1972, 266 So.2d 413.
EXHIBIT 21.1
 DIGITAL ANGEL CORPORATION  List of Subsidiaries
 Country or StateCompany Name
    
    of Incorporation/FormationDestron Fearing Corporation A/S f/k/a Daploma International A/S
    
    DenmarkDaploma Polska, Sp. z.o.o.
    
    PolandDigital Angel Chile, S.A.
    
    ChileDestron Fearing Corporation f/k/a Digital Angel Corporation, f/k/a Medical Advisory Systems, Inc.
    
    DelawareDigital Angel de Brazil Produtos de Information LTDA.
    
    BrazilDigital Angel Holdings, LLC
    
    MinnesotaDigital Angel International, Inc.
    
    MinnesotaDigital Angel Paraguay S.A.
    
    ParaguayDigital Angel Uruguay S.A.
    
    UruguayDigital Angel S.A.
    
    ArgentinaDigital Angel Technology Corporation f/k/a Digital Angel Corporation f/k/a Digital Angel.net Inc.
    
    DelawareDSD Holdings A/S
    
    DenmarkGT Acquisition Sub., Inc.
    
    MinnesotaSignature Industries Limited
    
    United KingdomThermo Life Energy Corp. f/k/a Advanced Power Solutions, Inc.
    
    Delaware
#### Gordon C. GRASTY et al., Appellant, v. OWENS-ILLINOIS GLASS COMPANY, a corporation, Appellee.

No. M-283.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

April 23, 1970.

Rehearing Denied May 15, 1970.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
Exhibit 10.6


 


Tobias Österdahl


Solhemsvägen 6B


141 31 Huddinge


Social security no. 780424-0492


 


 


 


 


Sundbyberg on November 18, 2005


 


 


 


Employment
Contract


 


 


Referring to the discussions, we offer a permanent
position at Xpeedio Support Solutions, to the post of Group Manager, with effect from 7 January 2006.


Your previous employment with Basset Telecom Solutions
is credited you.


 


Salary


Your salary shall be 39 000 SEK per month (2006).


In addition to the fixed salary, you are entitled
to a bonus, in accordance to current bonus model.


Salary payment is done once a month.


 


Overtime


No overtime compensation.


 


Working hours


Your working hours are 40 hours a week.


 


Vacation


30 days of paid vacation.


 


Business Travel


Business travel within and outside Sweden may occur.
Compensation for travel expenses according to the company travel policy.


 


Pension


You are entitled to pension according to current
pension plan. The Company reserves the right from time to time to introduce changes in, or elimination of, this Policy.


 


Intellectual property


The company owns the rights to all the material
you produce as part of your employment in the company. The company also owns the right to freely edit this material.


 


Notice


The notice period is according to applicable law.


 





Xpeedio Support
Solutions AB 


Esplanaden
3A w SE-172 67 Sundbyberg
w SWEDEN


Tel:
+46 8 5220 0300 w Fax:
+46 8 29 36 56


E-mail:
info@xpeedio.se w Internet:
www.xpeedio.se







 


 






    	 



    	 



    

 


 


This employment is subject to the company’s current regulations
and policies.


 


You are assumed not to commit yourself to other employments or assignments
that compete or interfere with this employment.


 


Please sign the agreement and return a copy in the enclosed reply
envelope.


 


 


 


 


Best regards,


Xpeedio Support Solutions AB


 


  


Jens Björkman


President & CEO


 


Confirmed:


 


on......../........-05


 


 /s/ Tobias Österdahl
  


Tobias Österdahl


 





Xpeedio Support
Solutions AB 


Esplanaden
3A w SE-172 67 Sundbyberg
w SWEDEN


Tel:
+46 8 5220 0300 w Fax:
+46 8 29 36 56


E-mail:
info@xpeedio.se w Internet:
www.xpeedio.se
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Surface Transportation Board

          - [Docket No. FD 36160]

# AGENCY:

Surface Transportation Board.

# ACTION:

Correction to Notice of Exemption.

                    On December 20, 2017, Great Lakes Terminal Railroad, LLC (GLTRR), a noncarrier at the time,[1]                                          filed a verified notice of exemption under 49 CFR 1150.31 to sublease from Great Lakes Reloading, LLC, and to operate, approximately 12,500 feet (2.37 miles) of railroad right-of-way and trackage and transloading facilities located at 13535 S. Torrence Avenue, in Chicago, Ill. The notice was served and published in the                     **Federal Register**                     on January 5, 2018, (83 FR 691), and became effective on January 19, 2018.                

On July 17, 2018, GLTRR filed a request to amend the notice. According to GLTRR, the map provided with its notice incorrectly depicted the property on which the subject trackage is located. Thus, GLTRR requests that the Board substitute the map identified as Amended Appendix 1-B to its petition for the map submitted in the notice. This correction is recognized here. All remaining information from GLTRR's original filing and the notice published on January 5, 2018 remains unchanged.

                    Board decisions and notices are available on our website at                     *WWW.STB.GOV.*

Decided: August 24, 2018.

By the Board, Amy C. Ziehm, Acting Director, Office of Proceedings.

Jeffrey Herzig,

Clearance Clerk.

# Footnotes

1.                             GLTRR stated that the transaction described in the December 20, 2017, notice was its initial railroad acquisition.                    
        Back to Citation      

[FR Doc. 2018-18859 Filed 8-29-18; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE 4915-01-P
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D18-2152

_____________________________

BENJAMIN L. CHAPPELL,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County.

Angela M. Cox, Judge.

October 16, 2018

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

ROBERTS, MAKAR, and BILBREY, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________
2

Benjamin L. Chappell, pro se, Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Samuel Steinberg, 

Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
#### Don DYE and Margaret F. Dye, his wife, Appellants, v. FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT COMPANY, a Florida corporation, Alfred D. Griffin, Individually and as Trustee, and Mary Catherine Griffin, his wife, et al., Appellees.

No. 70-978.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Dec. 22, 1970.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Broward County; George Richardson, Jr., Judge.

Appeal dismissed.
<PAGE>   1



                                                                 Exhibit 10(iv)

AGREEMENT made this 19th day of January, 1995.

BETWEEN:

                  HAVENSIGHT HOLDINGS LIMITED, a company
                  incorporated under the laws of the British Virgin
                  Islands

                  (hereinafter called "Havensight")

                                                       OF THE FIRST PART

                  - and -

                  INTERUNION FINANCIAL CORPORATION, a
                  corporation incorporated under the laws of Delaware

                  (hereinafter called "Interunion")

                                                       OF THE SECOND PART

WHEREAS Havensight has sold to Interunion all of the issued and outstanding
shares of Bearhill Limited ("Bearhill");

AND WHEREAS Bearhill is the owner of the ITM computer software (the "ITM
Software"), a computer program used to predict the timing of various markets;

AND WHEREAS it is possible that the ITM Software may be sold to a third party;

NOW THEREFORE THIS AGREEMENT WITNESSETH that in consideration of the mutual
covenants and agreements contained herein the parties covenant and agree as
follows:

1. If the ITM Software is to be sold to any party Interunion hereby covenants
and agrees that, immediately prior to such sale Havensight shall have the right
to acquire fifty percent (50%) of the shares of Bearhill for a purchase price
of $1.00.

2. It is hereby further agreed that if any shares of Bearhill, or any shares of
any affiliate (as that term is defined in the Ontario Securities Act) of
Bearhill are offered for sale to any Canadian corporation that is, or is an
affiliate of, a bank, trust company, insurance corporation, brokerage or
dealer, mutual fund dealer, or other financial institution (or any affiliate of
any such corporation), in conjunction or connection with the sale, lease or
other exploitation of the ITM Software, the parties hereto agree that they will
become equal holders of the balance of the shares of Bearhill (or such
affiliate of Bearhill) that are not sold to such Canadian corporations.

3. Each of the parties hereto shall do, execute, acknowledge, deliver or cause
to be done, executed, acknowledged or delivered, all such furthre acts, deeds,
documents, assignments, transfers, conveyances or powers of attorney as may be
reasonably necessary or desirable to effect complete consummation of the
transactions contemplated by this agreement.


                             Page E - 55 of E - 69
<PAGE>   2


IN WITNESS WHEREOF this agreement has been executed by the parties hereto.

                                              HAVENSIGHT HOLDINGS LIMITED

                                              BY    /s/ J.P. Fruchet
                                              --------------------------



                                              INTERUNION FINANCIAL CORPORATION

                                              BY   /s/ Georges Benarroch
                                              ---------------------------




                             Page E - 56 of E - 69
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Prospectus Supplement of
Centex Credit Corporation d/b/a Centex Home Equity Corporation relating to
Centex Home Equity Loan Trust 2000-C, of our report dated February 3, 2000, on
our audits of the consolidated financial statements of MBIA Insurance
Corporation and Subsidiaries as of December 31, 1999 and 1998 and for each of
the three years in the period ended December 31, 1999. We also consent to the
reference to our firm under the caption "Experts".

                                              By: /s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

September 11, 2000
United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 97-4138

___________

Freddy Baker, *

 *

Appellant, *

 *

v. *

 *

Arkansas Court of Appeals; John E. *

Jennings, Chief Judge, Arkansas Court *

of Appeals; Melvin Mayfield, Judge, *

Arkansas Court of Appeals; James R. *

Cooper, Judge, Arkansas Court of * Appeal from the United States

Appeals; Judith Rogers, Judge, * District Court for the

Arkansas Court of Appeals; John Mauzy * Eastern District of Arkansas. 

Pittman, Judge, Arkansas Court of *

Appeals; John B. Robbins, Judge, * [UNPUBLISHED]

Arkansas Court of Appeals; John *

Stroud, Jr., Judge, Arkansas Court of *

Appeals; Olly Neal, Judge, Arkansas *

Court of Appeals; Wendell L. Griffen, *

Judge, Arkansas Court of Appeals; *

Winston Bryant, Arkansas Attorney *

General; Todd L. Newton, Assistant *

Attorney General, *

 *

Appellees. *

___________

 Submitted: April 7, 1998

 Filed: April 24, 1998

___________
The Honorable Henry Woods, United States District Judge for the Eastern

1

District of Arkansas.

-2-

Before McMILLIAN, LOKEN, and MURPHY, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Freddy Baker, an Arkansas prisoner, appeals the district court&s dismissal,

1

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A, of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. Baker sought a

declaration that judges on the Arkansas Court of Appeals had violated his constitutional

rights by refusing to consider certain claims he had raised on direct appeal to that court;

he also sought to enjoin the Arkansas Attorney General from raising procedural bar in

future proceedings. We have carefully reviewed the record and conclude that the

district court did not err in dismissing the claims. The judgment is therefore affirmed.

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

BRIAN MCDANIEL,

Appellant

v.

PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF 

TRANSPORTATION OF 

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Appellee

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 21 EAP 2020

Appeal from the order of 

Commonwealth Court dated June 3, 

2020 at 44 MD 2015

ORDER

PER CURIAM DECIDED: April 29, 2021

AND NOW, this 29th day of April, 2021, the order of the Commonwealth Court is 

hereby AFFIRMED.