alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2018204EN.01021901.xml

| 13.6.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 204/219 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.6.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 204/219

---

P8_TA(2016)0339

Protocol to the EU-Switzerland Agreement on the free movement of persons (accession of Croatia) ***

European Parliament legislative resolution of 14 September 2016 on the draft Council decision on the conclusion of a Protocol to the Agreement between the European Community and its Member States, of the one part, and the Swiss Confederation, of the other, on the free movement of persons, regarding the participation of the Republic of Croatia as a Contracting Party, following its accession to the European Union (14381/2013 — C8-0120/2016 — 2013/0321(NLE))

(Consent)

(2018/C 204/34)

The European Parliament,

The European Parliament

| — | having regard to the draft Council decision (14381/2013), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the draft Council decision (14381/2013),

| — | having regard to the Protocol to the Agreement between the European Community and its Member States, of the one part, and the Swiss Confederation, of the other, on the free movement of persons, regarding the participation of the Republic of Croatia as a Contracting Party, following its accession to the European Union (14382/2013), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the Protocol to the Agreement between the European Community and its Member States, of the one part, and the Swiss Confederation, of the other, on the free movement of persons, regarding the participation of the Republic of Croatia as a Contracting Party, following its accession to the European Union (14382/2013),

| — | having regard to the request for consent submitted by the Council in accordance with Article 217, Article 218(6), point (a), and Article 218(8), second subparagraph, of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (C8-0120/2016), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the request for consent submitted by the Council in accordance with Article 217, Article 218(6), point (a), and Article 218(8), second subparagraph, of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (C8-0120/2016),

| — | having regard to Rule 99(1), first and third subparagraphs, Rule 99(2), and Rule 108(7) of its Rules of Procedure, |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to Rule 99(1), first and third subparagraphs, Rule 99(2), and Rule 108(7) of its Rules of Procedure,

| — | having regard to the recommendation of the Committee on Employment and Social Affairs (A8-0216/2016), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the recommendation of the Committee on Employment and Social Affairs (A8-0216/2016),

| 1. | Gives its consent to conclusion of the protocol; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Gives its consent to conclusion of the protocol;

| 2. | Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council, the Commission and the governments and parliaments of the Member States and of the Swiss Confederation. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council, the Commission and the governments and parliaments of the Member States and of the Swiss Confederation.

---
## MARYLAND DEPARTMENT OF THE ENVIRONMENT 1800 Washington Boulevard

- Baltimore MD 21230 410-537-3000

- 1-800-633-6101- 

### www.mde.state.md.us
Martin O'Malley Robert M. Summers, Ph.D. Governor Secretary Anthony G. Brown Lieutenant Governor 

### DEC 212012· ;. The'Honorable Shawn M. Garvin Regional Administrator (3RAOO) U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Region III 1650 Arch Street Philadelphia PA 19103-2023 Dear Mr. Garvin: Pursuant to the requirements of

### § 110 ofthe Clean Air Act (Act), we are officially requesting approval ofa revision to the State ofMaryland's State Implementation Plan (SIP). This SIP revision provides a detailed listing ofthe requirements of§ 110(a)(2) ofthe Act and confinnsthat all implementation, maintenance, and enforcementmeasures are in place in Maryland for the 2008 Ozone National Ambient Air Quality Standard (NAAQS), A public hearing for this SIPrevision was held in Baltimore, Maryland onDecember21, 2012. All required administrative procedures were properly followed throughout the hearing process. The electronic copy (CD) includes an exact duplicate ofthe hard copy submittal. Ifyou should have any questions concerning this letter, please do not hesitate to contactme at (410) 537-3086 or George (Tad) Aburn, Director ofthe Air and Radiation Management Administration at (410) 537-3255, orMs. Diane Franks, Program Manager, Air Quality Planning Program at (410) 537­ 3250 orby email atdfranks@mde.state.md.us. Sincerely,

Robert M. Summers, Ph.D. Secretary Enclosures cc: DianaEsher, Director, Air Protection Division, USEPA Region III George (Tad) S. Aburn, Jr., Director, Air and Radiation ManagementAdministration Diane Franks, Manager, Air Quality Planning Program

Recycled Paper www.rnde.state.md.us TTY Users [·800·735·2258 Via Maryland Relay Service
# C_2014408EN.01002001.xml

| 15.11.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 408/20 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.11.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 408/20

---

EUROJUST

Publication of the final accounts for the financial year 2013

2014/C 408/20

The complete version of the final accounts may be found at the following address:

http://www.eurojust.europa.eu/doclibrary/budget-finance/Pages/final-accounts.aspx

---
Exhibit No. 32.1


SMSA Shreveport Acquisition Corp.


File No. 000-54169


Form 10-Q


Quarter ended June 30, 2011








Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted


Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of SMSA Shreveport Acquisition Corp. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Timothy P. Halter, Chief Executive and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and


(2)
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








Date: August 8, 2011
By:
/s/ Timothy P. HalterTimothy P. HalterChief Executive Officer,and Chief Financial Officer








A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to SMSA Shreveport Acquisition Corp. and will be retained by SMSA Shreveport Acquisition Corp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 3702

To amend section 1341 of title 28, United States Code, relating to the

jurisdiction of the district courts over certain tax controversies.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

NOVEMBER 22, 1993

Mr. SYNAR introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee

on the Judiciary

A BILL

To amend section 1341 of title 28, United States Code,

relating to the jurisdiction of the district courts over

certain tax controversies.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That section 1341 of title 28, United States Code, is

4 amended—

5 (1) by inserting ‘‘(a) IN GENERAL.—’’ before

6 ‘‘The’’; and

7 (2) by adding at the end the following:

8 ‘‘(b) STATUTORY EXCEPTIONS.—(1) Any statutory

9 exception to the provisions of subsection (a) does not au10 thorize the commencement of an action in the district
2

•HR 3702 IH

1 courts of the United States unless the party bringing the

2 action has first exhausted the available judicial remedies

3 in State court that are plain, speedy, and efficient.

4 ‘‘(2) Paragraph (1) shall not apply—

5 ‘‘(A) to an action brought under section 11503a

6 of title 49; or

7 ‘‘(B) to an action if the party bringing the ac8 tion is the United States, the National Railroad Pas9 senger Corporation, or an Indian tribe as defined in

10 section 4(e) of the Indian Self-Determination and

11 Education Assistance Act (25 U.S.C. 450b(e)).’’.

Æ
EX-4.6




 Exhibit 4.6 

Schedule of Officers’ Certificates 
 delivered pursuant to Section 301 of the Indenture dated September 10, 1997 
 by and between Waste Management, Inc. and The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A., as 
 Trustee, establishing the terms and form of Waste Management, Inc.’s Outstanding Senior Notes 
  

															
	Principal
Amount
Issued	 	 	Interest Rate
(per annum)	 	 	Issue Date	 	Maturity Date	 	CUSIP	 	Interest Payment Dates
	$	150 million	* 	 	 	7.125	% 	 	12/17/1997	 	12/15/2017	 	902917AF0	 	December 15; June 15
	$	600 million	* 	 	 	7.00	% 	 	7/17/1998	 	7/15/2028	 	902917AH6	 	January 15; July 15
	$	250 million	* 	 	 	7.375	% 	 	12/21/1999	 	5/15/2029	 	94106LAG4	 	May 15; November 15
	$	500 million	* 	 	 	7.75	% 	 	5/21/2002	 	5/15/2032	 	94106LAN9	 	May 15; November 15
	$	350 million	  	 	 	5.00	% 	 	3/5/2004	 	3/15/2014	 	94106LAR0	 	March 15; September 15
	$	600 million	  	 	 	6.10	% 	 	3/6/2008	 	3/15/2018**	 	94106LAS8	 	March 15; September 15
	$	350 million	  	 	 	6.375	% 	 	2/26/2009	 	3/11/2015**	 	94106LAT6	 	March 11; September 11
	$	450 million	  	 	 	7.375	% 	 	2/26/2009	 	3/11/2019**	 	94106LAU3	 	March 11; September 11
	$	600 million	  	 	 	6.125	% 	 	11/12/2009	 	11/30/2039**	 	94106LAV1	 	May 30; November 30
	$	600 million	  	 	 	4.75	% 	 	6/8/2010	 	6/30/2020**	 	94106LAW9	 	June 30; December 30
	$	400 million	  	 	 	4.60	% 	 	2/28/2011	 	3/1/2021**	 	941063AQ2	 	March 1; September 1
	$	500 million	  	 	 	2.60	% 	 	8/29/2011	 	9/1/2016**	 	94106LAX7	 	March 1; September 1
	$	500 million	  	 	 	2.90	% 	 	9/12/2012	 	9/15/2022**	 	94106LAY5	 	March 15; September 15

  

	*	Each of these series of Senior Notes has been partially redeemed, such that the remaining outstanding principal amount of such Senior Notes as of December 31, 2013
was $146.8 million, $577.2 million, $222.9 million and $496.0 million, respectively. 


	**	Each of these series of Senior Notes contain a Change of Control Offer covenant that provides, if a change of control triggering event occurs, each holder of the notes
may require us to purchase all or a portion of such holder’s notes at a price equal to 101% of the principal amount, plus accrued interest, if any, to the date of purchase. 

 This schedule is provided in accordance with Instruction 2 to Regulation S-K Item 601, as each of the series of Series Notes is governed by an
instrument that differs only in the material respects set forth in the schedule above from the Officers’ Certificate identified as Exhibit 4.4. Each of the series of Senior Notes identified above is also guaranteed by Waste Management
Holdings, Inc. in favor of The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A., as Trustee for the holders of Waste Management, Inc.’s Senior Notes.
EXHIBIT 32.1

                           SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION

         In connection with the quarterly report of Rainbow Coral Corp. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended November 30, 2010 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Louis Foxwell, President
of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. SS. 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.

January 12, 2011                        /s/ Louis Foxwell
                                        -----------------
                                        Louis Foxwell, President, Principal
                                        Executive Officer, Principal Financial
                                        and Accounting officer


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA 

Present: Chief Judge Moon, Senior Judges Cole and Duff 

PUBLIC BROADCASTING SERVICES 

AND 

GREAT NORTHERN INSURANCE COMPANY MEMORANDUM OPINION*

 PER CURIAM 

v. Record No. 0487-96-4 JULY 9, 1996 

 

MARY E. PAX-SHIPLEY 

 FROM THE VIRGINIA WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMMISSION 

 (Charles P. Monroe; Jeffrey R. Dion; Mell, 

Brownell & Baker, on briefs), for appellants. 

 (Andrew S. Kasmer; Chasen & Boscolo, on 

brief), for appellee. 

 Public Broadcasting Services and its insurer contend that 

the Workers' Compensation Commission erred in finding that Mary 

E. Pax-Shipley's bilateral tendinitis and/or tenosynovitis 

qualify as occupational "diseases" within the meaning of 

"disease" under the Workers' Compensation Act ("the Act"). 

 This appeal is controlled by the Supreme Court's decision in 

Stenrich Group v. Jemmott, 251 Va. 186, 199, 467 S.E.2d 795, 802 

(1996) (holding that "job-related impairments resulting from 

cumulative trauma caused by repetitive motion, however labeled or 

however defined, are, as a matter of law, not compensable under 

the present provisions of the Act"). 

 Accordingly, we reverse the commission's decision. 

 Reversed.

 

 *Pursuant to Code § 17-116.010 this opinion is not 

designated for publication.
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
(Form S-8 No. 33-55547, 33-55657, 333-42019 and 333-77505) of Coram Healthcare
Corporation of our report dated March 3, 2003, except for Note 3, which is as of
April 7, 2003, with respect to the consolidated financial statements and
schedule of Coram Healthcare Corporation included in this Annual Report (Form
10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2002.

We also consent to the incorporation by reference in Amendment No. 3 to the
Registration Statements (Form S-3 No. 33-59661 and 33-60959) and Amendment No. 1
to the Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-12955) and related prospectuses
of Coram Healthcare Corporation for the registration of 3,526,325, 2,686,656 and
184,444 shares, respectively, of its common stock, of our report dated March 3,
2003, except for Note 3, which is as of April 7, 2003, with respect to the
consolidated financial statements and schedule of Coram Healthcare Corporation
included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2002.


                                                           /s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP
                                                           ---------------------
                                                               ERNST & YOUNG LLP


Denver, Colorado
April 11, 2003
**EXHIBIT 32**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906**

 

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, the undersigned officer of LED Lighting Company (the "Company"), hereby certify to my knowledge that:

 

The Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2017 of the Company fully complies, in all material respects, with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained in the Report fairly represents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

Date: August 21, 2017

 

*/s/ Kevin Kearney*

Chief Executive Officer and

Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 32.2


Section 906 Certification


of Derek J. Gaertner (CFO and CCO)





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of MACC Private Equities Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended September 30, 2010, as filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Derek J. Gaertner, Chief Financial Officer and Chief Compliance Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)           The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(2)           The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.











/s/ Derek J. Gaertner


Derek J. Gaertner,


Chief Financial Officer and Chief


Compliance Officer





Date: December 29, 2010
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Kevin Hales, Appellant.

[721 NYS2d 257]

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Rios, J.), rendered October 15, 1997, convicting him of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is reversed, on the law, and a new trial is ordered.

The defendant correctly contends that his right to a public trial was violated by the exclusion of his mother from the courtroom during the jury charge. The defendant’s counsel sufficiently objected to the trial court’s *sua sponte*decision to exclude the defendant’s mother, who had testified earlier in the case *(see,*CPL 470.05 [2]). The trial court’s justification for the exclusion, that the presence of a witness during the charge might influence or distract the jury, was not sufficient to demonstrate that an overriding interest was likely to be prejudiced by her presence *(see, People v Martinez,*82 NY2d 436; *People v Kin Kan,*78 NY2d 54; *People v Sbarbaro,*244 AD2d 581).

The defendant’s remaining contentions are without merit. Friedmann, J. P., Florio, Luciano and Feuerstein, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 32.1   CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Quarterly Report of Hazlo! Technologies, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Alejandra J. De La Torre, Chief Executive and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:  1.  The Report fully complies with requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.   Dated:  August 9, 2011  /s/ Alejandra J. De La Torre Alejandra J. De La Torre Title: Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
Filed 1/26/ 21 P. v. Parker CA5

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS
California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115. IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent,

v.
DEWAYNE KEITH PARKER, Defendant and Appellant. F079785
(Super. Ct. No. P16900179

- 3)



### OPINION

THE COURT *
APPEAL from orders of the Superior Court of Fresno County. Mark E. Cullers, Judge. Peggy A. Headley, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant. Office of the State Attorney General, Sacramento, California, for Plaintiff and Respondent.

- ooOoo

-

* Before Poochigian, Acting P.J., Meehan, J. and DeSantos, J.2

.

Appointed counsel for defendant Dewayne Keith Parker asked this court to review the record to determine whether there are any a rguable issues on appeal. ( People v.
Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436.) Defendant was advised of his right to file a supplemental brief within 30 days of the date of filing of the opening brief. Defendant did not respond. Finding no arguable error that would result in a disposition more favorable to defendant,
we affirm.
BACKGROUND On March 27, 2012, defendant was convicted by plea of vehicle manslaughter with gross negligence (Pen. Code, § 192, subd. (c)(1); count 1) and corporal injury to a spouse (Pe n. Code, § 273.5, subd. (a) ) . The trial court sentenced him to eight years in prison. On July 9, 2016, defendant was released on parole. His parole was scheduled to expire on April 13, 2021. On July 26, 2019, defendant’s parole officer filed a petition for revocation of defendant’s parole, alleging various parole violations. At a parole violation hearing on July 30, 2019, defendant informed the trial court he wished to admit the allegation that he failed to enroll in an outpatient drug treatment

progra m. Defense counsel stated the admission was against his advice. But defendant insisted. The court advised him of the various rights he was giving up and defendant responded that he understood. He also stated he had had enough time to discuss the rights with counsel. Defendant admitted the allegation, stating he was doing so because it was true; he said he knew the conduct was a violation of parole. The court found his admission voluntarily and knowingly made. The court found he had violated parole. It ordered 100 days in custody, awarded credits, and reinstated parole under the original
terms and conditions.3

.

On August 6, 2019, defendant filed a letter stating he wished to appeal the court’s
order.
We have reviewed the record and find no arguable er ror that would result in a disposition more favorable to defendant.
DISPOSITION The trial court’s July 30, 2019 orders are affirmed.
<PAGE>


                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.5

                    CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

         As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the use of our
report dated September 9, 1999 on the Music Marketing Network, Inc. financial
statements and to all references to our Firm included in or made part of this
registration statement.


                                 /s/ ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP
                               -------------------------------
                                     ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP

Roseland, New Jersey
September 25, 2000