alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Charles JOHNSON.

No. 59551.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Sept. 19, 1977.

Elizabeth W. Cole, Orleans Indigent Defender Program, New Orleans, for defendant-appellant.

William J. Guste, Jr., Atty. Gen., Barbara Rutledge, Asst. Atty. Gen., Harry F. Con-nick, Dist. Atty., William L. Brockman, Asst. Dist. Atty., for plaintiff-appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
Order Filed August 12 , 2016

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05
- 16
- 00869 CV MARK JOSLIN , Appellant

V. ELAD BANAI AND ISAAC BANAI, Appellees On Appeal from County Court at Law Number 6

Collin County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 006
- 02799
- 2015



### ORDER Before Chief Justice Wright and Justices Lang

- Miers and Stoddart By letter dated August 1 1, 2016, Collin County Clerk Stacey Kemp informs us appellant has n ot paid the clerk’s fee, and she requests an extension of time to file the record

. We GRANT the request to the extent that we ORDER appellant to file, no later than August 22, 2016, written documentation that he has paid, or made arrangements to pay, the clerk’s fee or he is entitled to proceed in this appeal without pre

- payment of costs. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 35.3(a). Appellant is cautioned that failure to comply may result in dismissal of the appeal without further notice. See id. 37.3(b).

/s/ ELIZABETH LANG

- MIERS JUSTICE
MAC-2013-10K Ex 10.33 (DirectorandExecutiveComp)




Exhibit 10.33




Description of Director and Executive Compensation Arrangements




A.    Non-Employee Director Compensation, effective August 7, 2013.


Annual Retainer for Service on the Board: 


		
	•
	$60,000 payable in quarterly installments.




Annual Equity Award for Service on the Board: 


		
	•
	An equity award equal to $110,000 based upon the closing price of our common stock on the NYSE on the date of the grant. The grant is made in March of each year with a one year vesting period.




Annual Retainer for Lead Director – $30,000.


Annual Retainer for Chairperson of the Audit and Compensation Committees – $32,500.  


Annual Retainer for Chairperson of the Nominating & Corporate Governance Committee – $25,000.


Annual Retainer for Committee Membership – $12,500 for each Committee (non-chair members).




Each equity award is made pursuant to the Company’s 2003 Equity Incentive Plan.  In addition, the Director Phantom Stock Plan offers non-employee directors the opportunity to defer cash compensation and to receive that compensation (to the extent that it is actually earned by service during that period) in shares of common stock rather than in cash after termination of service or on a specific payment date.  In addition, non-employee directors are able to defer all or a portion of their equity awards and receive the underlying common stock after termination of service or on a specific payment date.











B.    Executive Officers.


The base salaries for the Company’s current executive officers who were named executive officers in the Company’s Proxy Statement filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on April 19, 2013 are as follows:


	
					
	Arthur M. Coppola, Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer
	 
	

	$1,000,000
	


	Edward C. Coppola, President
	 
	

	$800,000
	


	Thomas E. O'Hern, Senior Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
	 
	

	$550,000
	


	Thomas J. Leanse, Senior Executive Vice President, Chief Legal Officer and Secretary
	 
	

	$500,000
	


	Robert D. Perlmutter, Executive Vice President, Leasing
	 
	

	$500,000
	









The Company has an annual incentive compensation program for our executive officers under which bonuses, which may be in the form of cash and/or equity awards, are granted to reflect corporate and individual performance during the prior calendar year. The actual bonus amounts granted are determined by the Compensation Committee based on its assessment of corporate and individual performance for each executive officer.


The Company also has a long-term incentive plan for its executive officers consisting of LTIP Units, which may be service-based LTIP Units or performance-based LTIP Units. Service-based LTIPs typically vest over a period of three years. Performance-based LTIP Units vest based on the percentile ranking of our total stockholder return per share of common stock for the performance period relative to all publicly-traded equity REITS, excluding all mortgage REITs, as measured at the end of the performance period.
#### GENERAL FINANCE CORPORATION, Appellant, v. Eli ANDREWS, Appellee.

No. R-406.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

July 24, 1973.

Robert B. Staats, Thomas R. Ellinor, and Lynn C. Higby, Panama City, for appellant.

Franklin R. Harrison, of Davenport, Johnston & Harris, Panama City, for ap-pellee.

PER CURIAM.

This cause having been orally argued before the court, the briefs and record on appeal having been read and given full consideration, and appellant having failed to demonstrate reversible error, the judgment of the lower court hereby appealed is affirmed.

WIGGINTON, Acting C. J., and JOHNSON and SPECTOR, JJ., concur.
----

----

III Pranešimas

Europos gynybos agentūra

----

PRANEŠIMAS APIE LAISVAS PAREIGYBES

(2005/C 33 A/01)

Europos gynybos agentūra numato priimti:

Galutinis paraiškų pateikimo terminas: 2005 m. vasario 25 d., paliudytas pašto antspaudu.

Daugiau informacijos (anglų kalba) ir paraiškų formas galima gauti Tarybos interneto svetainėje adresu: http://ue.eu.int (kontaktai/darbo pasiūlymai)

----
Exhibit 32.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 The undersigned, Sean Tan, hereby certifies, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: (1)the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Berkeley Coffee & Tea, Inc. for the period ended January 31, 2011 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Berkeley Coffee & Tea, Inc.  Dated:  March 11, 2011/s/ Sean TanSean Tan
President, Chief Executive Officer
Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer
Secretary, Controller and sole Director(Principal Executive Officer, Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)
#### STATE of Louisiana v. McKinley J. REDDIX.

No. 59653.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Sept. 19, 1977.

Rena M. Price, Orleans Indigent Defender Program, New Orleans, for defendant-appellant.

William J. Guste, Jr., Atty. Gen., Barbara Rutledge, Asst. Atty. Gen., Harry F. Con-nick, Dist. Atty., William L. Brockman, Asst. Dist. Atty., for plaintiff-appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)

In connection with this Report on Form 10-Q for the three and nine months ended June 30, 2017, or the Report, of PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd., or the Registrant, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Aviv Efrat, Chief Financial Officer of the Registrant, hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge, that:

 

|        |     |                                                                                                                                        |
|--------|-----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and |

 

|        |     |                                                                                                                                                         |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant. |

 

|                                                       |
|-------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                  |
| /s/ Aviv Efrat                                        |
| Name:  Aviv Efrat                           |
| Title:    Chief Financial Officer |
| Date:    August 8, 2017      |
#### STATE of Oklahoma, ex rel., OKLAHOMA BAR ASSOCIATION, Complainant, v. Ronald Gene FISHER, Respondent.

No. SCBD 3663.

No. OBAD 952.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma.

July 14, 1992.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

SIMMS, Judge:

Respondent, Ronald Gene Fisher, was convicted in the State of Texas of the felony of Securing Execution of a Document by Deception, a third degree felony, and sentenced to ten years probation with a fine of $5,000.00. On February 20, 1990, this Court suspended Respondent from the practice of law pursuant to Rule 7.3, Rules Governing Disciplinary Proceedings, 5 O.S. 1981, Ch. 1, App. 1-A. Respondent appealed the conviction, and it was affirmed, as evidenced by a copy of the mandate from the Texas Court of Appeals. Upon receipt of the mandate, this Court issued an order directing Respondent to show cause why a final order of discipline should not be made. Respondent has failed to respond. From an examination of the matters set forth in the Indictment and Judgment and Sentence, conviction of the felony of Securing Execution of a Document by Deception, demonstrates Respondent’s unfitness to practice law.

RESPONDENT, RONALD GENE FISHER, IS HEREBY DISBARRED.

All the Justices concur.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Carl Montalbano, Appellant.

Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from an amended sentence of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Beldock, J.), imposed August 13, 1990, under Indictment No. 8428/87 and a sentence of the same court (Thomas, J.), also imposed August 13, 1990, under Indictment No. 6452/89.

Ordered that the amended sentence and sentence are affirmed, and the matter is remitted to the Supreme Court, Queens County, for further proceedings pursuant to CPL 460.50 (5). No opinion. Mangano, P. J., Bracken, Eiber, Balletta and O’Brien, JJ., concur.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR
. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR
. R. 47.5.4. 

### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-10800 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff-Appellee

v. CARLOS REYNA-MORENO, also known as Ernesto Vega Defendant-Appellant
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 5:07-CR-10-ALL
Before REAVLEY, BARKSDALE, and GARZA, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Carlos Reyna-Moreno raises arguments that are foreclosed by A lmendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998), which held that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) is a penalty provision and not a separate criminal offense. U nited States v. Pineda-Arrellano, 492 F.3d 624, 625 (5th Cir. 2007), petition for cert. filed (Aug. 28, 2007) (No. 07-6202). The Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

### F I L E D December 12, 2007 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3994 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 3994

      To provide limitations on the use of certain funds for the 
establishment of diplomatic relations between the United States and the 
        territory of the former Yugoslav republic of Macedonia.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 10, 1994

 Mr. Bilirakis (for himself, Mrs. Maloney, Ms. Snowe, and Mr. Frank of 
Massachusetts) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Foreign Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
      To provide limitations on the use of certain funds for the 
establishment of diplomatic relations between the United States and the 
        territory of the former Yugoslav republic of Macedonia.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. UNITED STATES DIPLOMATIC RELATIONS WITH THE FORMER YUGOSLAV 
              REPUBLIC OF MACEDONIA.

    No funds authorized to be appropriated to the Department of State 
may be used to pay any expense associated with the establishment of 
diplomatic relations between the United States and the territory of the 
former Yugoslav republic of Macedonia under any official designation of 
such territory which includes the term ``Macedonia''. For the purposes 
of this section, ``establishment of diplomatic relations'' shall 
include, the establishment, upgrading, or expansion of any consulate, 
embassy, mission, or other post of the Department of State, and any 
increase in the number or level of positions at any such post.

                                 <all>
```
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-15-00138-CV

IN RE EL CABALLERO RANCH, INC.

and Laredo Marine, LLC

Original Mandamus Proceeding1

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Marialyn Barnard, Justice

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

Jason Pulliam, Justice

Delivered and Filed: March 18, 2015

PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS DENIED

On March 12, 2015, relators El Caballero Ranch, Inc. and Laredo Marine, LLC filed a 

petition for writ of mandamus and a motion for emergency relief pending a ruling on the mandamus 

petition. The court has considered the petition for writ of mandamus and is of the opinion that 

relators are not entitled to the relief sought. Accordingly, the petition for writ of mandamus and 

the motion for emergency relief are denied. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a).

PER CURIAM

1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 13-04-00108-CVL, styled Grace River Ranch, LLC v. El Caballero Ranch, 

Inc. a/k/a El Caballero, LLC and Laredo Marine, LLC v. Robert W. Brittingham, pending in the 218th Judicial District 

Court, La Salle County, Texas, the Honorable Stella Saxon presiding.
----

Reference for a preliminary ruling by the Hoge Raad der Nederlanden by order of that court of 15 October 2004 in the case of H. A. Solleveld against Inspecteur van de Belastingdienst — ondernemingen Amersfoort

(Case C-443/04)

(2005/C 6/49)

Language of the case: Dutch

Reference has been made to the Court of Justice of the European Communities by order of the Hoge Raad der Nederlanden (Netherlands Supreme Court), Third Chamber (Netherlands) of 15 October 2004 received at the Court Registry on 20 October 2004, for a preliminary ruling in the case of H. A. Solleveld against Inspecteur van de Belastingdienst — ondernemingen Amersfoort on the following question:

Must Article 13(A)(1)(c) of the Sixth Directive (1) be construed as meaning that exemption from VAT is conferred in respect of interventions comprising the establishment of a diagnosis, the provision of therapeutic advice and possible provision of treatment, in the framework of the diagnostic treatment described in paragraphs 3.1.2 and 3.1.3 above, even where those interventions cannot be subsumed within the exercise, by the person carrying out those interventions, of a medical or paramedical profession as defined by the Member State concerned?

----

(1)OJ L 145 of 16.6.1977, p. 1.

----
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Denali Commission","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.denali.gov","author_name":"rdata","author_url":"https:\/\/www.denali.gov\/author\/rdata\/","title":"Grants","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"Xq4x7WQ5iU\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.denali.gov\/grants\/\">Grants<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.denali.gov\/grants\/embed\/#?secret=Xq4x7WQ5iU\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Grants” — Denali Commission\" data-secret=\"Xq4x7WQ5iU\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n"}
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-6624

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff – Appellee,

v.
JOHN HOWARD HUDSON, a/k/a Nort,

Defendant – Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at Charleston. John T. Copenhaver, Jr., District Judge. (2:99-cr-00048-1)

Submitted: March 10, 2009 Decided: April 7, 2009

Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Michael T. Clifford, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellant. J. Patrick Rowan, Assistant Attorney General, Michael Mullaney, John W. Van Lonkhuyzen, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM:
John Howard Hudson timely appeals the district court’s
order denying his motion for reduction of sentence pursuant to
18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006), and motion to supplement. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,

we affirm. United States v. Hudson , No. 2:99-cr-00048-1 (S.D.
W. Va. Apr. 1, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.

AFFIRMED
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JAMES JEGANGA GUGUNI,

 Petitioner,

 v.

ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 07-71738

Agency No. A079-358-447

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted March 8, 2011** 

Before: FARRIS, O’SCANNLAIN, and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.

James Jeganga Guguni, a native and citizen of Kenya, petitions for review of

the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing his appeal from an

immigration judge’s decision denying his application for asylum, withholding of

removal, and relief under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We have

FILED

MAR 24 2011

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 07-71738

jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for substantial evidence, Rivera v.

Mukasey, 508 F.3d 1271, 1274 (9th Cir. 2007) , and we deny the petition for

review.

Substantial evidence supports the agency’s adverse credibility finding

because the inconsistencies regarding the circumstances of the December 1993

arrest and the length of Guguni’s detention following that arrest go to the heart of

his claim. See Li v. Ashcroft, 378 F.3d 959, 962-64 (9th Cir. 2004) (as long as one

of the identified grounds is supported by substantial evidence and goes to the heart

of the claim, we are bound to accept the agency’s adverse credibility finding). The

agency properly considered and rejected Guguni’s explanations for those

inconsistencies. See id. at 963. 

In the absence of credible testimony, Guguni’s asylum and withholding of

removal claims fail. See Farah v. Ashcroft, 348 F.3d 1153, 1156 (9th Cir. 2003).

Because Guguni’s CAT claim is based on testimony the agency found not

credible, and he points to no other evidence to show it is more likely than not he

would be tortured if he is returned to Kenya, his CAT claim fails. See id. at

1156-57.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO RULE 15d-14(a) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

I, Dan Caruso, Chief Executive Officer of Zayo Group, LLC, certify that:



|1. | I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Zayo Group, LLC; and
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                        |  |     |  |                        
|----------------------- |  | --- |  | -----------------------
|Date: February 24, 2012 |  | By: |  | /s/ Dan Caruso         
|                        |  |     |  | Dan Caruso             
|                        |  |     |  | Chief Executive Officer