alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20460 

Mr. Steve Mahoney 

Manager of Regulatory Affairs 

Superior Oil Company, Inc. 

1402 North Capitol Avenue 

Suite 100 

Indianapolis, IN 46202 

SEP 08 2014 

OFFICE OF CHEMICAL SAFETY 

AND POLLUTION PREVENTION 

Re: Conditional Exemption to a Test Rule Issued Under Section 4 of the Toxic Substances Control 

Act for CASRN 98-56-6 

Dear Mr. Mahoney: 

The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is conditionally granting Superior Oil 

Company's exemption application for the test requirements issued under section 4 of the Toxic 

Substances Control Act for benzene, 1-chloro-4-(trifluoromethyl)- (a.k.a, PCBTF) (CASRN 98-

56-6) (Testing of Certain High Production Volume Chemicals; Third Group of Chemicals, 76 FR 

65385, October 21, 201 1). 

The EPA has determined that Superior Oil Company's exemption application, submitted by 

Greenwich Chemical Consulting, Inc., and dated August 27, 2014, fulfills the requirements for a 

conditional exemption as described in 40 CFR part 790, subpart E. The EPA test rule regulations 

at 40 CFR 790, subpart E, allow the EPA to exempt companies from test rule requirements when 

another company is already conducting the required testing, as long as the exempt company 

applies for an exemption and includes a statement of financial responsibility at 40 CFR section 

790.99. Exemptions are also conditioned on the EPA receiving acceptable test data that is 

adequate to fulfill the test rule requirements. 

Testing for PCBTF is being conducted by the PCBTF Testing Consortium. If for reasons 

specified in 40 CFR 790.93(a), the EPA should terminate Superior Oil Company's conditional 

exemption, it will be notified by certified letter or by a Federal Register Notice. 

Internet Address (URL) • http //www epa gov 

Recycled/Recyclable • Pnnted with Vegetable Oil Based Inks on 100% Postconsumer. Process Chlorine Free Recycled Paper 
If you have any questions, please contact Mr. John Schaeffer by telephone at (202) 564-8173 or 

email at schaeffer.john@epa.gov. 

cc: Mr. John V. Massingale, Panel Manager 

PCBTF Testing Consortium, 

Greenwich Chemical Consulting, Inc. 

Docket EPA-HQ-OPPT-2009-0112 

Paul Lewis, Ph.D. 

Chief, Chemical Information 

and Testing Branch
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                         11,171
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  117,732
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (4,388)
<INVENTORY>                                    102,159
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               236,954
<PP&E>                                         15,196
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (6,070)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 265,804
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          227,111
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       11
<OTHER-SE>                                     29,881
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   265,804
<SALES>                                        936,703
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               936,703
<CGS>                                          868,716
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  868,716
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               57,188
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             4,697
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                6,102
<INCOME-TAX>                                   1,797
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            4,305
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   4,305
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0.41
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0.37
        


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.1

Certification of Principal Executive Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350

(Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)





I, Wayne Allyn Root, Chief Executive Officer of Winning Edge International, Inc. (the "Registrant") do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge, based upon a review of the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended July 31, 2007 of the Registrant, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"):



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.



By: /s/



-------------------------------



Wayne Allyn Root



Chief Executive Officer



November 27, 2007



* A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Winning Edge International, Inc. and will be retained by Winning Edge International, Inc. and furnished to the Securities Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
EXHIBIT 32





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350





In connection with the quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Constellation Growth Corporation (the "Company") for the quarter ended September 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Joseph Rozelle, President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge that:





1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








Date: November 23, 2010





/s/ Joseph RozelleJoseph Rozelle

President

(Principal Executive and Financial Officer)











The foregoing certification is being furnished as an exhibit to the Report pursuant to Item 601(b)(32) of Regulation S-K and  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code) and, accordingly, is not being filed as part of the Report for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not incorporated by reference into any filings of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.
Exhibit 32.1 - SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION



EXHIBIT 32.1

Section 1350 Certifications



I am the Corporate Secretary, Acting Principal
Executive Officer and Acting Principal Financial Officer of IPOWorld, a Nevada corporation (the “Company”). I am delivering
this certificate in connection with the Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended December 31, 2014 and filed with the U.S.
Securities and Exchange Commission (“Form 10-Q”).



Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of IPOWorld (the “Company”) certifies
to his knowledge that:

|    |                                                                                                                                                                                                             
|--- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(1) | The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period ended December 31, 2014 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|    |                                                                                                                                                                                                             
|(2) | The information contained in that Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial conditions and results of operations of the Company.                                                   
|   





|/s/ Ed Heckerson                                                                                          
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Ed Heckerson                                                                                              
|Corporate Secretary,
        Acting Principal Executive Officer
        Acting Principal Financial Officer
|                                                                                                          
|Date: 
    March 24, 2015                                                                                 
|
DEPARTMENT OF THEARMY HEADQUARTERS, U.S

.ARMY AERONAUTICAL SERVICES AGENCY 9325 GUNSTON ROAD, SUITE N319 FORT BELVOIR, VA 22060-5582 FEB 092017 Office of the Director of Plans, Policy and Programs US Department of Transportation Docket Operations, M-30 1200New Jersey Avenue, SE, Room W12-140 Washington, DC 20590-0001 Dear Sir orMadam: Request anextension to Exemption Number 10241A (Regulatory Docket Number FAA-2002-11883) granted tothe Department
of the Army. This exemption from § 91.169(a)(2) and (c) of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR) allows the U.S Army tofile instrument flight rules flight plansin accordance with the regulations prescribed by the U.S. Army. This petition
is intended toremain
a requirement for the conceivable future. For questions regarding this request,contactMr. Abe Roman, at703-806-2266

or abe.j.roman.civ@mail.mil. Sincerely, Lawrence S. Dibble Director of Plans, Policy and Programs
```

[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 18 (Thursday, January 27, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 4987]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-1788]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice: 7310]

Culturally Significant Objects Imported for Exhibition 
Determinations: ``Treasures From the Hermitage: Russia's Crown Jewels''

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: 
Pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 
(79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), Executive Order 12047 of March 27, 
1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 
Stat. 2681, et seq.; 22 U.S.C. 6501 note, et seq.), Delegation of 
Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, and Delegation of Authority No. 
236-3 of August 28, 2000, I hereby determine that the objects to be 
included in the exhibition ``Treasures from the Hermitage: Russia's 
Crown Jewels,'' imported from abroad for temporary exhibition within 
the United States, are of cultural significance. The objects are 
imported pursuant to loan agreements with the foreign owners or 
custodians. I also determine that the exhibition or display of the 
exhibit objects at the Houston Museum of Natural Science, Houston, TX, 
from on or about May 20, 2011, until on or about November 27, 2011, and 
at possible additional exhibitions or venues yet to be determined, is 
in the national interest. Public Notice of these Determinations is 
ordered to be published in the Federal Register.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For further information, including a 
list of the exhibit objects, contact Carol B. Epstein, Attorney-
Adviser, Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State 
(telephone: 202/632-6473). The address is U.S. Department of State, SA-
5, L/PD, Fifth Floor, Washington, DC 20522-0505.

    Dated: January 11, 2011.
Ann Stock,
Assistant Secretary, Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs, 
Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2011-1788 Filed 1-26-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-05-P
```
EX-10.7



 Exhibit 10.7 

AMENDMENT NUMBER FOUR 
 WHEREAS, the
parties listed herein known respectively as CHEROKEE EQUITIES CORPORATION as Landlord and BANCCOMPLIANCE GROUP, LLC., a Tennessee Limited Liability Company and Constance and David Edwards, personally as Tenant entered into a Lease Agreement dated
October 17, 2005, for commercial real estate property (“the Premises”) located at Suite A 102 in Premier Professional Office Park, located at 256 Seaboard Lane, Franklin, Tennessee 37067, and 

WHEREAS, the parties amended said Lease by Amendment Number One dated October 30, 2008, Amendment Number Two, dated May 1, 2010, Amendment Three
Dated March 11, 2012, and 
 WHEREAS, the parties desire to renew said Lease by virtue of this Amendment Number Four, and have mutually agreed to the
following terms 
  

	 	1.	Term: The Term of this renewal period shall be twelve months (12 months) commencing on the first day of May 2013, and ending on April 30, 2014. 


 

	 	2.	Rental: The monthly rental for the renewal period shall be $2,300.00 from May, 2013 - April 2014 payable without demand or further notice on the first day of each month. 


3. Carpets will be cleaned along traffic areas and other areas accessible upon arrangement for a suitable date with Tenant. 

All other terms and conditions of the original Lease and Amendments shall remain in full force and effect. 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Amendment in duplicate on the date as noted below 

 

									
	LANDLORD. Cherokee Equities Corporation	 		 	TENANT: BancCompliance Group, Inc.
	By:	 	The Stanton Group, Inc. Agent	 		 	Constance E. Edwards, President
				
		 	



	 		 	




		 	  
 Debra C. Viol, President and Agent
for Cherokee Equities Corporation
	 		 	  

		 		 		 	Constance E. Edwards
					
	Date:	 	 6/19/13
	 		 	Date:	 	 June 7, 2013



									
					
	Witness:	 	



	 		 	Witness:
Exhibit32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Reportof Shearson Mid-West Futures Fund (the"Partnership") on Form 10-K for the yearending December 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the "Report"),I, David J. Vogel, President and Director of Citigroup Managed FuturesLLC, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to§ 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition and results of operations ofthe Partnership.

/s/ David J.Vogel

|  |
|--|
|  |  |
|  |

David J.Vogel Citigroup Managed Futures LLC President andDirector

March 29,2006

|  |
|--|
|  |  |
|  |

Date

----
Drone Request
Thomas Gifford 360 NW Royal Boulevard Portland, OR 97210 tgifford@comcast.net

October 26, 2015

Petitionfor Section 333 Exemption

I herebyformally request FAAauthorization forThomas Gifford (hereafter "PETITIONER") to operate a UAS for civil (non-governmental) purposes otherthan for recreation or hobby.

PETITIONER requests to be exemptedfrom 14CFR 

### §§ 61.23(a) and (c), 61.101 (e)(4) and (5), 61.113(a), 61.315(a), 91.7(a), 91.119(c), 91.121, 91.151(a)(1), 91.405(a), 91.407(a)(1), 91.409(a)(1) and (2), and 91.417(a) and (b), to the extent necessaryto allow PETITIONER

### to operate a UAS to perform aerial data collection, including but not limitedtoaerial imaging.

PETITIONER requests this exemption for its use of UAS both within and withoutthe United States. PETITIONER travels abroad for photographic endeavors and seeks to use UAS in accordance with all laws of foreign and domestic governmental authorities.

PETITIONER requests this permission

### to pursue its use of UAS models including OJI Phantom 1, OJI Phantom 2, DJI Phantom 3, OJI Inspire, 30 Robotics IRIS+, 30 Robotics Solo, 30 Robotics X8+, and 30 Robotics X8- M, LilyCamera, orother similar commercially-available and widely-available UAS models.

PETITIONER will conduct its use of UAS in a mannerwhich will minimize risk to the NAS, other persons, and property. The following procedures will 

### befollowed: (1) UAS will be given a pre-flight inspection before each flightto examine air-worthiness, (2) UAS 

### will not

### be materiallyaltered from commercial specifications exceptfor battery, prop, and battery alterations, (3) UAS will not beflown over people, (4) UAS will always beflown within line ofsightto operator(s) pursuantto Section 333(b)(1), (5) UAS will never reach altitudes over exceeding those allowed, (6) UAS will never reach speeds exceeding 50 mph, (7) operator

### will perform a pre-flightvisual inspection ofthe NASto determine nearbydangers such as low-flying manned or unmanned aerial vehicles, power lines,

### and buildings, (8) UAS will be checked forflight stability, proper connection to remote control, and proper performance at avery low altitude before reaching the NAS, and (9) non-participating spectators will be asked to stay a safe distance awayfrom the flight path of the UAS and its landing location. PETITIONER is an experienced UAS operator with more than one year of experience.

This petition will benefitthe public interest. PETITIONER will provide imagerywhich is not otherwise possible to be captured withoutthe use of a UAV, which will assist companies to which the images may be sold, will enhance the public understanding of nature photographed bythe UAS, and PETITIONER will be able to provide UAS safety information to those with whom he or she comes in contact.

Please grantthe requested exemption under Section 333.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

FRANCISCO RUBEN LUGOGONZALEZ,

 Petitioner,

 v.

LORETTA E. LYNCH, Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 13-71076

Agency No. A088-884-115

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted June 22, 2015** 

Before: HAWKINS, GRABER, and W. FLETCHER, Circuit Judges.

Francisco Ruben Lugo-Gonzalez, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions

for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying his

motion to reopen. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for an

FILED

JUN 30 2015

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

 * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

 ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
abuse of discretion the BIA’s denial of a motion to reopen. Cano-Merida v. INS,

311 F.3d 960, 964 (9th Cir. 2002). We deny the petition for review.

The BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying Lugo-Gonzalez’s motion to

reopen as to his Convention Against Torture claim because the evidence he

provided was not particular to him and did not establish it is more likely than not

he will be tortured by the Mexican government or with its consent or acquiescence. 

See INS v. Abudu, 485 U.S. 94, 104 (1988) (the BIA may deny a motion to reopen

for failure to establish a prima facie case for the relief sought). Lugo-Gonzalez

does not challenge the BIA’s denial of his motion to reopen as to his asylum and

withholding of removal claims. See Martinez-Serrano v. INS, 94 F.3d 1256, 1259-

60 (9th Cir. 1996) (issues not specifically raised and argued in a party’s opening

brief are waived). We reject Lugo-Gonzalez’s contention that the BIA misstated

the record. Thus, we deny the petition for review.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

2 13-71076
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                               1,067
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                            0
<ALLOWANCES>                                             0
<INVENTORY>                                              0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     1,067
<PP&E>                                                   0
<DEPRECIATION>                                           0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       1,067
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               78,974
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                             2,090
<OTHER-SE>                                         434,085
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         1,067
<SALES>                                                  0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                         0
<CGS>                                                    0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                            0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    86,506
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                       0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                          0
<INCOME-TAX>                                             0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               (86,506)
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (85,352)
<EPS-BASIC>                                           0.21
<EPS-DILUTED>                                         0.04


</TABLE>
----

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

(Second Chamber)

of 16 December 2004

in Case C-293/03 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal du travail de Bruxelles): Gregorio My v Office national des pensions (ONP) (1)

(Community officials - Transfer of pension rights - Article 11 of Annex VIII to the Staff Regulations - Early retirement pension - Reckoning of periods of employment with the European Community - Article 10 EC)

(2005/C 45/16)

Language of the case: French

In Case C-293/03: REFERENCE for a preliminary ruling under Article 234 EC from the Tribunal du travail de Bruxelles (Belgium), made by decision of 20 May 2003, received at the Court on 4 July 2003, in the proceedings between Gregorio My and Office national des pensions (ONP) – the Court (Second Chamber), composed of: C.W.A. Timmermans, President of the Chamber, C. Gulmann, R. Schintgen (Rapporteur), G. Arestis and J. Klučka, Judges; A. Tizzano, Advocate General; M. Múgica Arzamendi, Principal Administrator, for the Registrar, has given a judgment on 16 December 2004, in which it has ruled:

Article 10 EC, in conjunction with the Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Communities, must be interpreted as meaning that national legislation which does not permit years of employment completed by a Community citizen in the service of a Community institution to be taken into account for the purposes of entitlement to an early retirement pension under the national scheme is contrary to those provisions.

----

(1) OJ C 251 of 8.10.2003.

----