alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)

In connection with this Report on Form 10-Q for the three months ended December 31, 2019, or the Report, of PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd., or the Registrant, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Arthur H. Penn, Chief Executive Officer of the Registrant, hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge, that:

 

|        |     |                                                                                                                                        |
|--------|-----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and |

 

|        |     |                                                                                                                                                         |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant. |

 

|                                                       |
|-------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                  |
| /s/ Arthur H. Penn                                    |
| Name:  Arthur H. Penn                       |
| Title:    Chief Executive Officer |
| Date:    February 5, 2020         |
#### CITY OF VERO BEACH, a municipal corporation of the State of Florida, Petitioner, v. Lindsey L. BROWN, Respondent.

No. 43322.

Supreme Court of Florida.

March 20, 1973.

Certiorari denied. 271 So.2d 222.

CARLTON, C. J., and ROBERTS, ERVIN, ADKINS and BOYD, JJ., concur.
<PAGE>
                                                                      EXHIBIT 12

                    ENERGY EAST CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

               COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                 SIX MONTHS
                                    ENDED                            CALENDAR YEAR
                                  JUNE 30,     ---------------------------------------------------------
                                    2000         1999        1998        1997        1996        1995
                                 -----------   ---------   ---------   ---------   ---------   ---------
                                                               (THOUSANDS)
<S>                              <C>           <C>         <C>         <C>         <C>         <C>
Net Income.....................   $149,798     $218,751    $194,205    $175,211    $168,711    $177,969

Add:
  Federal income
    tax--current...............     88,000      646,757      98,427     111,829      79,015      63,502
  Federal income
    tax--deferred..............    (15,084)    (441,721)     38,749       5,884      28,928      52,362
                                  --------     --------    --------    --------    --------    --------
    Pre-tax income.............    222,714      423,787     331,381     292,924     276,654     293,833
Fixed charges..................     59,414      134,754     136,108     136,121     137,243     155,424
                                  --------     --------    --------    --------    --------    --------
Earnings, as defined...........   $282,128     $558,541    $467,489    $429,045    $413,897    $449,257
                                  ========     ========    ========    ========    ========    ========

Fixed Charges:
  Interest on long-term debt...    $43,808      $93,678     $98,040    $104,122    $108,431    $115,687
  Other interest...............      9,022       30,453      21,421      13,192       9,752       8,744
  Amortization of premium and
    expense on debt............      5,006        6,374       6,507       6,502       6,507       6,488
  Interest portion of rental
    charges....................      1,380        1,543       1,557       2,963       3,023       5,784
  Earnings required to cover
    preferred stock dividends
    of subsidiary..............        198        2,706       8,583       9,342       9,530      18,721
                                  --------     --------    --------    --------    --------    --------
Total fixed charges, as
  defined......................   $ 59,414     $134,754    $136,108    $136,121    $137,243    $155,424
                                  ========     ========    ========    ========    ========    ========
Ratio of Earnings to Fixed
  Charges......................       4.75         4.14        3.43        3.15        3.02        2.89
                                  ========     ========    ========    ========    ========    ========
</TABLE>
<PAGE>

                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS


We hereby consent to the use in the Prospectus constituting part of this
Pre-Effective Amendment to the Registration Statement of the Group VEL Account
of Allmerica Financial Life Insurance and Annuity Company on Form S-6 of our
report dated February 1, 2000, relating to the financial statements of Allmerica
Financial Life Insurance and Annuity Company, and our report dated April 3,
2000, relating to the financial statements of the Group VEL Account of Allmerica
Financial Life Insurance and Annuity Company, both of which appear in such
Prospectus. We also consent to the reference to us under the heading
"Independent Accountants" in such Prospectus.


/s/ PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Boston, Massachusetts
September 15, 2000
EXHIBIT
32.1

CERTIFICATION
OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL

OFFICER
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the Report of Dardanos Acquisition Corp. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended
March 31, 2013 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, William
Tay, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:



|(1) | The Report
    fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information
    contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
    Company.
|--- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



By:
/s/ William Tay

William
Tay, President, Secretary and

Principal
Financial Officer

Dated:
April 22, 2013
# C_2016303EN.01014801.xml

| 19.8.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 303/148 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.8.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 303/148

---

Opinion of the European Economic and Social Committee on the ‘Proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council fixing the adjustment rate provided for in Regulation (EU) No 1306/2013 for direct payments in respect of the calendar year 2016’

(COM(2016) 159 final — 2016/0086 COD)

(2016/C 303/22)

On 11 April 2016 the Council decided to consult the European Economic and Social Committee, under Article 43(2) of the TFEU, on the:

Proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council fixing the adjustment rate provided for in Regulation (EU) No 1306/2013 for direct payments in respect of the calendar year 2016

Proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council fixing the adjustment rate provided for in Regulation (EU) No 1306/2013 for direct payments in respect of the calendar year 2016

(COM(2016) 159 final — 2016/0086 COD).

Since the Committee has already set out its views on the content of the proposal in question in its opinions CES2942-2013_00_00_TRA_AC, adopted on 22 May 2013 (*), EESC-2014-02897-00-00-AC, adopted on 5 June 2014 (**) and EESC-2015-02052-00-00-AC-TRA, adopted on 22 April 2015 (***), it decided, at its 517th plenary session of 25 and 26 May 2016 (meeting of 25 May), by 161 votes to 2 with 8 abstentions, not to draw up a new opinion on the subject, but to refer to the position it had taken in the above-mentioned documents.

*

**

***

Brussels, 25 May 2016.

The President of the European Economic and Social Committee

Georges DASSIS

---

(*)  EESC opinion NAT/602 on the Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on fixing an adjustment rate to direct payments provided for in Regulation (EC) No 73/2009 in respect of calendar year 2013 (OJ C 271, 19.9.2013, p. 143).

*

(**)  EESC opinion NAT/646 on the Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on fixing an adjustment rate for direct payments provided for in Council Regulation (EC) No 73/2009 in respect of calendar year 2014 (OJ C 424, 26.11.2014, p. 73).

**

(***)  EESC opinion NAT/668 on the Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on fixing the adjustment rate provided for in Regulation (EU) No 1306/2013 for direct payments in respect of calendar year 2015 (OJ C 291, 4.9.2015, p. 60).

***

---
# C_2015413EN.01001001.xml

| 12.12.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 413/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.12.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 413/10

---

Notice concerning the definitive anti-dumping duty imposed on imports of crystalline silicon photovoltaic modules and key components (i.e. cells) originating in or consigned from the People’s Republic of China and concerning the countervailing measures in force in respect of imports into the Union of crystalline silicon photovoltaic modules and key components (i.e. cells) originating in or consigned from the People’s Republic of China: change of name of one company subject to an individual anti-dumping duty rate and individual countervailing duty rate

(2015/C 413/08)

Imports of crystalline silicon photovoltaic modules and key components (i.e. cells) originating in or consigned from the People’s Republic of China are subject to an anti-dumping duty imposed by Council Implementing Regulations (EU) No 1238/2013 (1) and a countervailing duty imposed by Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1239/2013 (2).

1

2

Era Solar Co., Ltd, TARIC additional code B818, a company subject to an individual anti-dumping duty rate of 41,3 % and an individual countervailing duty rate of 6,4 % following Implementing Regulations (EU) No 1238/2013 and (EU) No 1239/2013, notified the Commission of its change of name to Zhejiang Era Solar Technology Co., Ltd.

The company argued that its change of name does not affect its right to continue to benefit from the individual anti-dumping duty and the individual countervailing duty rate previously applied to Era Solar Co., Ltd.

The Commission has examined the information supplied and concluded that the change of name in no way affects the findings of Implementing Regulations (EU) No 1238/2013 and (EU) No 1239/2013.

Therefore, the reference in Annex I to Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1238/2013 and the reference in Annex 1 to Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1239/2013 to:

| Era Solar Co., Ltd | B818 |
| --- | --- |

Era Solar Co., Ltd

B818

should be read as:

| Zhejiang Era Solar Technology Co., Ltd | B818 |
| --- | --- |

Zhejiang Era Solar Technology Co., Ltd

B818

The TARIC additional code B818, previously attributed to Era Solar Co., Ltd shall apply to Zhejiang Era Solar Technology Co., Ltd.

---

(1)  OJ L 325, 5.12.2013, p. 1.

1

(2)  OJ L 325, 5.12.2013, p. 66.

2

---
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3693 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3693

To designate the United States courthouse under construction in Denver, 
       Colorado, as the ``Byron White United States Courthouse''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           November 22, 1993

 Mr. Schaefer introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
              Committee on Public Works and Transportation

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To designate the United States courthouse under construction in Denver, 
       Colorado, as the ``Byron White United States Courthouse''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The United States courthouse being constructed through renovation 
of the old post office building in Denver, Colorado, shall be known and 
designated as the ``Byron White United States Courthouse''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the courthouse referred to in section 1 
shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Byron White United States 
Courthouse''.

                                 <all>
```
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Homeland Security

###### Federal Emergency Management Agency

          - [Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-4377-DR; Docket ID FEMA-2018-0001]

# AGENCY:

Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

This notice amends the notice of a major disaster declaration for the State of Texas (FEMA-4377-DR), dated July 6, 2018, and related determinations.

# DATES:

This amendment was issued July 31, 2018.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Dean Webster, Office of Response and Recovery, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street SW, Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-2833.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The notice of a major disaster declaration for the State of Texas is hereby amended to include the following area among those areas determined to have been adversely affected by the event declared a major disaster by the President in his declaration of July 6, 2018.

Jim Wells County for Individual Assistance.

(The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA) are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, Community Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis Counseling; 97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034, Disaster Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance Grant; 97.048, Disaster Housing Assistance to Individuals and Households In Presidentially Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049, Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance—Disaster Housing Operations for Individuals and Households; 97.050 Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance to Individuals and Households—Other Needs; 97.036, Disaster Grants—Public Assistance (Presidentially Declared Disasters); 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant.)

Brock Long,

Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.

[FR Doc. 2018-18835 Filed 8-29-18; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE 9111-11-P
### TEXA S C OU R T OF A PPEAL S, THIR D DIST R ICT , AT AU STIN NO. 03-06-00472- CR Wil lia m M onr oe , A ppe lla nt

v. The State of Texas, App ellee F ROM THE DISTRICT CO URT OF TRAVIS COUNTY , 331ST JUDICI AL DISTRICT

NO. 99351 7, HO NORAB LE BO B PERK INS, JUDGE P RESIDING

M E MO R

A N D UM O P I N I O N Wil liam Monroe see ks to appea l from a ju d gme nt of conviction for ag g ravated sexual assault of a child. The trial c ourt has ce rtified that Monroe waived the right of appe al. SeeTe x. R. Ap p. P. 2 5. 2( a )( 2) ; Mo nre al v. Sta te , 99 S.W. 3d 61 5, 62 2 ( Te x. Cr im. Ap p. 20 03 ); see also Blanco v . S tate , 18 S.W .3d 218, 220 (Tex. Crim. App. 2000).

The a ppeal is dismissed. SeeTex. R. App. P . 25.2(d).

__________________________________________ Bob Pembe rton, J ustice Be fore Chief J ustice L aw, Justi ces Puryear and Pember

ton Dismissed for Want of J urisdiction Filed: September

6, 2006 Do No t Pu

bli sh
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Finance and Accounting Service Providing payment services for the U.S. Department of Defense

Search
Search

Search

              - 
              - 
              - 
              - 
              - 

-  Military Member		 
-  Retired Military & Annuitant		 
-  Civilian Employee		 
-  Contractor & Vendor		 

Homedebtandclaimspaymydebt

**866-912-6488 **Mon-Fri:7:30 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. ESTContact UsPrivacy Information

askDFAS

                        - Make a Payment
                        - Installment Payments
                        - Education Debt Information                            - Types of Education Debts
                          - Student Deferment
                          More
                        - Waivers and Remissions                            - Current or Former Military
                          - Retiree
                          - Annuitants
                          - Civilian Employees
                          - Former Spouse
                          - Completing Your Application
                          - Finance Officials - Waivers
                          - Finance Officials - Remissions
                          More
                        - Check Payment Status
                        - Update Mailing Address
                        - Travel Advance Debts
                        - Protesting Your Debt                            - Base Level Debt
                          - Non Base Level
                          More
                        - Payment in Arrears                            - Submitting a Claim
                          - Disability Severance Tax Refunds
                          More
                        - Correction of Records
                        - Bankruptcy
                        - Failure to Pay a Debt
                        - Frequently Asked Questions

### Stay Connected

Department of Defense     Department of Veterans Affairs     Military Employment Verification     Warrior Care Website     Defense Contract Mgmt Agency  DoD Forms     Department of State     Civilian Personnel Mgmt Service     DTS Travel Center     System for Award Mgmt (SAM)    Congressional/LegislationPersonnel Force Innovation     Freedom of Information Act     DFAS Hotline   Contact Us     Accessibility / Section 508    EEO / No Fear Act  

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil
BEFORE THE 

FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION 

WASHINGTON, D.C. 

C E J W 

SEP 2 2 2009 

n 

AIRPORT/ENVIRONMENTAL 

LAW, AGC-600 

SKYDIVE SACRAMENTO, 

Complainant, 

V. 

THE CITY OF LINCOLN, CALIFORNIA, 

Respondent. 

Docket No. 16-09-09 

RESPONDENT'S MOTION TO DISMISS 

September 21,2009 

Please serve: 

Scott P. Lewis 

Christine M. Griffin 

ANDERSON & KREIGER LLP 

One Canal Park, Suite 200 

Cambridge, MA 02141 

T: 617.621.6500 

F: 617.621.6660 

slewis@andersonkreiger.com 

cgrifFm@andersonkreiger. com 

Counsel for Respondent 

( O 

-C.3 

C 5 
BEFORE THE 

FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION 

WASHINGTON, D.C. 

SKYDIVE SACRAMENTO, 

Complainant, 

V. 

THE CITY OF LINCOLN, CALIFORNIA, 

Respondent. 

Docket No. 16-09-09 

RESPONDENT'S MOTION TO DISMISS 

The respondent, the City of Lincoln, California (the "City"), moves under 14 C.F.R. 

§ 16.23(j) to dismiss the Complaint by Skydive Sacramento ("Skydive") on the following 

grounds: 

1. Skydive's evidence is insufficient to warrant an investigation by the FAA. 

2. Skydive has not shown that the City is currently in violation of any applicable 

grant assurance or federal statute. 

3. There is no reasonable basis for further investigation or enforcement action by the 

FAA on Skydive's claim that the City has violated Grant Assurance 22 because: 

a. Skydive has not shown that it is similarly-situated to any of the City's 

Airport tenants that have more favorable lease terms; and 

b. the City has legitimate, non-discriminatory reasons for the lease terms it 

has offered to Skydive. 

4. There is no reasonable basis for further investigation or enforcement action by the 

FAA on Skydive's claim that the City has imposed unattainable conditions because Skydive has 
not shown that it is unable to obtain the insureince coverage the City requires and Skydive's 

unattainable conditions claim is moot. 

5. There is no reasonable basis for further investigation or enforcement action by the 

FAA on Skydive's claim that the City has violated 49 U.S.C. § 40103(e) (or Grant Assurance 23) 

because Skydive has not offered any evidence that the County has granted any unlawful 

exclusive right. 

6. There is no reasonable basis for further investigation or enforcement action by the 

FAA on Skydive's claim concerning discounts offered to large-volume purchasers of fuel. 

By it^-attomeys. 

ristinelM. Gmfm 

'^ANDERS0N>&^6IEIGER LLP 

One Canal Park, Suite 200 

Cambridge, MA 02141 

T: 617.621.6500 

F: 617.621.6660 

sIewis@andersonkreiger.com 

cgriffm@andersonkreiger.com 

Counsel for Respondent 

September 21, 2009 
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I hereby certify in accordance with 14 CFR § 16.15(a) that today I served the foregoing 

Respondent's Motion to Dismiss on the following persons at the following addresses by Federal 

Express: 

Richard J. Durden 

Attorney at Law 

27987 Richmond Hill Road 

Conifer, CO 80433 

Office of Chief Counsel, Attention: 

FAA Part 16 Airport Proceedings Docket 

AGC-610 

FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION 

800 Independence Avenue, SW 

Washington, DC 20591 

Dated this 21'* day of September, 2009