alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I

★

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 3851

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to eliminate the marriage

penalty.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

FEBRUARY 10, 1994

Mr. ISTOOK (for himself, Mr. GILCHREST, Mr. EMERSON, Mr. DORNAN, Mr.

CALVERT, Mr. PETE GEREN of Texas, Mr. DOOLITTLE, Mr. LIVINGSTON,

Mr. GOSS, Mr. HASTERT, Mr. GREENWOOD, Mr. CALLAHAN, Mr.

GALLEGLY, Mr. PETRI, Mr. ALLARD, Mr. MACHTLEY, and Mr. HUTCHINSON) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee

on Ways and Means

A BILL

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to eliminate

the marriage penalty.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That (a) part I of subchapter B of chapter 1 of the Inter4 nal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by adding at the

5 end thereof the following new section:

6 ‘‘SEC. 69. ELIMINATION OF MARRIAGE PENALTY.

7 ‘‘Notwithstanding any other provision of law, no hus8 band and wife shall be required to pay more in income
2

•HR 3851 IHIS

1 taxes under this subtitle because of the fact that they were

2 legally married during a taxable year, than they would be

3 required to pay if they had not been married. This section

4 shall be implemented by—

5 ‘‘(1) giving married couples an annual option of

6 both filing using the tax status that they both would

7 have otherwise used if they had not been married,

8 and

9 ‘‘(2) allocating income and deductions between

10 them as they would have if they had not been mar11 ried.’’

12 (b) The table of sections for part I of subchapter B

13 of chapter 1 of such Code is amended by adding at the

14 end thereof the following new item:

‘‘Sec. 69. Elimination of marriage penalty.’’

15 (c) The amendments made by this section shall apply

16 to taxable years beginning after the date of the enactment

17 of this Act.

Æ
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**

 

**PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2015 (the “Report”) of New Mountain Finance Corporation (the “Registrant”), as filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, David M. Cordova, the Chief Financial Officer of the Registrant, hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge, that:

 

(1)           The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

(2)           The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.

 
| /s/   DAVID M. CORDOVA |                  |
|------------------------|-----------------------|
|                   |                  |
| Name:                  | David   M. Cordova    |   |
| Date:                  | August 5,   2015 |   |

 

----
#### Eddie B. ASHLEY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 73-132.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

April 3, 1974.

James A. Gardner, Public Defender, and Robert B. Persons, Jr., Asst. Public Defender, Sarasota, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Robert J. Landry, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellee.

GRIMES, Judge.

Appellant was charged pursuant to Fla. Stat. § 810.02, F.S.A., with breaking and entering a building with intent to commit a felony therein, to-wit: grand larceny. Following a not guilty plea, the jury returned a verdict finding him guilty of grand larceny. Appellant was adjudicated guilty of grand larceny.

Grand larceny is not a lesser included offense to the crime of breaking and entering a building with intent to commit a felony therein, to-wit: grand larceny. Albritton v. State, 1939, 137 Fla. 20, 187 So. 601; Davis v. State, Fla.App.2d, 1969, 226 So.2d 257. The breaking and entering of a building with the intent to commit a felony is an entirely separate offense from the felony which is intended. Albritton v. State, supra; State v. Conrad, Fla.App. 4th, 1971, 243 So.2d 174. An accused may be convicted of either or both the breaking and entering and the intended felony. Taylor v. State, 1939, 138 Fla. 762, 190 So. 262; Goodwin v. State, 1946, 157 Fla. 751, 26 So.2d 898; Evans v. State, Fla.App.3rd 1967, 197 So.2d 323. The evidence essential to prove one is not essential to conviction on the other, and the gravamen of the two offenses is not the same. Taylor v. State, supra; Evans v. State, supra. Hence, appellant was convicted on a charge which was not made against him.

One cannot be convicted for a separate offense with which he is not charged. Cole v. Arkansas, 1948, 333 U.S. 196, 68 S.Ct. 514, 98 L.Ed.2d 644; Perkins v. Mayo, Fla.1957, 92 So.2d 641. See Reil*617ly v. State, Fla.App.3rd, 1968, 212 So.2d 796.

The judgment is reversed.

HOBSON, A. C. J., and BOARDMAN, J., concur.
EXHIBIT 23

INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT


            We  consent  to  the  incorporation  by  reference  in  Registration
Statement  No.  33-16201  on Form S-8 of our report  dated  February  18,  2000,
appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of The Deltona  Corporation for the
year ended December 31, 1999.

JAMES MOORE & CO.  P.L.

Certified Public Accountants
Gainesville, Florida

March 24, 2000

<PAGE>

                                                                     EXHIBIT 23

INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT


            We  consent  to  the  incorporation  by  reference  in  Registration
Statement No. 33-16201 on Form S-8 of our report dated March 25, 1998, appearing
in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of The Deltona Corporation for the year ended
December 31, 1999.

DELOITTE & TOUCHE  LLP

Certified Public Accountants
Miami, Florida

March 24, 2000
<PAGE>

                                                                   Exhibit 23.1

                Consent of Ernst & Young LLP, Independent Auditors

We consent to the reference to our firm under the captions "Selected
Consolidated Financial Data" and "Experts" in the Registration Statement
(Form S-3) and related Prospectus of Carreker Corporation (formerly
Carreker-Antinori, Inc.) for the registration of 4,000,000 shares of its
common stock and to the incorporation by reference therein of our report
dated March 7, 2000, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of
Carreker Corporation included in its Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year
ended January 31, 2000, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Dallas, Texas
September 28, 2000
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Oconee
Federal Financial Corp. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), the undersigned, T. Rhett Evatt, President and Chief Executive
Officer of the Company, and Curtis T. Evatt, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, each certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to best of his
knowledge:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                     |  |                   
|---------------------------------------------------- |  | ------------------
|/s/ T. Rhett Evatt                                   |  | Date: May 16, 2011
|T. Rhett Evatt                                       |  |                   
|President and Chief Executive Officer                |  |                   
|                                                     | 
|/s/ Curtis T. Evatt                                  |  | Date: May 16, 2011
|Curtis T. Evatt                                      |  |                   
|Executive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer |  |                   

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Oconee Federal
Financial Corp. and will be retained by Oconee Federal Financial Corp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



28
MPS GROUP, INC.



Exhibit 21

MPS GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

SUBSIDIARIES OF MPS GROUP, INC.



|                                     |  |                             
|------------------------------------ |  | ----------------------------
|Name of Subsidiary                   |  | Jurisdiction ofIncorporation
|                                     | 
|Domestic Subsidiaries                |  |                             
|                                     | 
|Accounting Principals, Inc.          |  | Florida                     
|Entegee, Inc.                        |  | Massachusetts               
|Modis, Inc.                          |  | Florida                     
|Special Counsel, Inc.                |  | Maryland                    
|Pacioli Operations Corp.             |  | Florida                     
|Modis Professional Services, Inc.    |  | Florida                     
|MPS Group, LLC                       |  | Florida                     
|Soliant Health, Inc.                 |  | Georgia                     
|Sunbelt Staffing Solutions, Inc.     |  | Florida                     
|Data Management Consultants, Inc.    |  | Missouri                    
|Modis/Computer Action, Inc.          |  | Florida                     
|Modis Consulting Partners, Inc.      |  | Texas                       
|Idea Integration Corp.               |  | Florida                     
|Beeline.com, Inc.                    |  | Florida                     
|Beeline Operations Corp.             |  | Florida                     
|Alderson Reporting Company, Inc.     |  | Delaware                    
|Amicus Staffing, Inc.                |  | Tennessee                   
|The McKinley Group of Florida LLC    |  | Delaware                    
|Integrated Performance Systems, Inc. |  | Illinois                    
|Garelli Wong & Associates, Inc.      |  | Illinois                    
|                                     | 
|Foreign Subsidiaries                 |  |                             
|MPS Group International PLC          |  | UK                          
|Badenoch and Clark Limited           |  | UK                          
|Modis International Limited          |  | UK                          
|Modis International Co.              |  | Canada                      
|Beeline International Company        |  | Canada                      
|Modis Europe Nederland BV            |  | The Netherlands             
|Modis Europe Limited                 |  | UK                          
|Corinthe Holding BV                  |  | The Netherlands             
|Netlogic Limited                     |  | UK
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA 

WESTERN DISTRICT 

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, 

 Respondent 

 v. 

EUGENE ISLER, 

 Petitioner 

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 242 WAL 2015 

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Superior Court 

ORDER 

PER CURIAM 

AND NOW, this 4th day of November, 2015, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

is DENIED.
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Department of Justice
 On August 20, 2018, the Department of Justice lodged a proposed Consent Decree with the United States District Court for the Northern District of Iowa in the lawsuit entitled 
                    *United States*
                     v. 
                    *AG Processing Inc.,*
                     Civil Action No. 3:18-cv-03052-LRR. The United States filed this lawsuit under Section 311(j) of the Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C. 1321(j). The United States' complaint seeks injunctive relief and civil penalties for violations of the Spill Prevention, Control, and Countermeasure regulations and the Facility Response Plan regulations at defendant's facilities in Iowa, Nebraska, and Minnesota. The consent decree requires the defendant to perform injunctive relief and pay a $500,000 civil penalty. The publication of this notice opens a period for public comment on the Consent Decree. Comments should be addressed to the Assistant Attorney General, Environment and Natural Resources Division, and should refer to 
                    *United States*
                     v. 
                    *AG Processing Inc.,*
                     D.J. Ref. No. 90-5-1-1-11716. All comments must be submitted no later than thirty (30) days after the publication date of this notice. Comments may be submitted either by email or by mail: To submit comments:
Send them to:By email
*pubcomment-ees.enrd@usdoj.gov.*By mail
Assistant Attorney General, U.S. DOJ—ENRD, P.O. Box 7611, Washington, DC 20044-7611.
 During the public comment period, the Consent Decree may be examined and downloaded at this Justice Department website: 
                    *https://www.justice.gov/​enrd/​consent-decrees.*
                     We will provide a paper copy of the Consent Decree upon written request and payment of reproduction costs. Please mail your request and payment to: Consent Decree Library, US DOJ—ENRD, P.O. Box 7611, Washington, DC 20044-7611. Please enclose a check or money order for $12.75 (25 cents per page reproduction cost) payable to the United States Treasury. Susan M. Akers, Assistant Section Chief, Environmental Enforcement Section, Environment and Natural Resources Division.


[FR Doc. 2018-18651 Filed 8-28-18; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4410-15-P
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 399

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to increase the child care

credit for lower-income working parents.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JANUARY 5, 1993

Mr. SOLOMON introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Ways and Means

A BILL

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to increase

the child care credit for lower-income working parents.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Child Care Tax Credit

5 Reform Act of 1993’’.

6 SEC. 2. CHILD CARE CREDIT AMENDMENTS.

7 (a) INCREASE IN AMOUNT OF EMPLOYMENT-RELAT8 ED EXPENSES TAKEN INTO ACCOUNT.—

9 (1) 1 QUALIFYING INDIVIDUAL.—Paragraph (1)

10 of section 21(c) of the Internal Revenue Code of
2

•HR 399 IH

1 1986 (relating to dollar limit on amount creditable)

2 is amended by striking ‘‘$2,400’’ and inserting

3 ‘‘$3,600’’.

4 (2) 2 OR MORE QUALIFYING INDIVIDUALS.—

5 Paragraph (2) of section 21(c) of such Code (relat6 ing to dollar limit on amount creditable) is amended

7 by striking ‘‘$4,800’’ and inserting ‘‘$5,400’’.

8 (b) DENIAL OF CREDIT TO TAXPAYERS WHOSE AD9 JUSTED GROSS INCOME IS $50,000 OR MORE.—Para10 graph (1) of section 21(a) of the Internal Revenue Code

11 of 1986 (allowing credit generally) is amended by inserting

12 ‘‘whose adjusted gross income for the taxable year is less

13 than $50,000, and’’ before ‘‘who’’.

14 (c) DECREASE IN PERCENTAGE OF EMPLOYMENT15 RELATED EXPENSES TAKEN INTO ACCOUNT BY TAX16 PAYERS WHOSE ADJUSTED GROSS INCOME EXCEEDS

17 $28,000.—Paragraph (2) of section 21(a) of the Internal

18 Revenue Code of 1986 (defining applicable percentage) is

19 amended by striking ‘‘(but not below 20 percent)’’.

20 (d) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by

21 subsections (a), (b), and (c) shall apply to taxable years

22 beginning after December 31, 1993.

Æ
EXHIBIT
10.52


 


PROSPECT
SILICA ENTERPRISES, INC.


 


February
1, 2014


 


Contract
Extension


 


	To:		Q lotus Holdings Inc.



520
N. Kingsbury Street, Ste. 1810


Chicago,
IL 60654


 


Attn:
Mr. Gary Rosenberg and Jorge Gonzalez.


 


Re:
3 month extension via current contract.


 


We
at Prospect Silica Enterprises Inc. by way of the board of directors have called a special meeting regarding the extension and
approval of time.


 


The
parties hereto hereby waive all past defaults and extend the Contract to a revised expiration date of April 30, 2014.


 


The
extension is approved for an additional 3 months starting February 1, 2014 and is hereby extended to April 30, 2014. It is our
desire that this contract extension will be beneficial to all parties.


 


Sincerely,


 


PROSPECT
SILICA ENTERPRISES, INC.


 





	 	 






Ron
Gibson,


President


 


AGREED
AND ACCEPTED:


 


Q
LOTUS HOLDINGS, INC.


 


	 	 	 
	Gary Rosenberg,	 	Jorge Gonzalez,
	Chief Executive Officer	 	Chief Financial Officer


 


201
FOREST CREEK RD, JACKSONVILLE, OR 97530
EXHIBIT 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. {section} 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of China Highlands Limited (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending December 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Jeremy Mork, Chief Executive and Financial  Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. {section} 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes- Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



|Dated:  March 16, 2011
By  /s/ Jeremy Mork
-----------------------------
    Jeremy Mork
    Chief Executive and  Financial Officer
   (Principal Executive and Financial Officer)
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
ACCEPTED

12-14-00368-CR

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS

TYLER, TEXAS

8/24/2015 2:32:00 PM

CATHY LUSK

CLERK

 FILED IN 12th COURT OF APPEALS TYLER, TEXAS 8/24/2015 2:32:00 PM CATHY S. LUSK Clerk
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report of ABC Acquisition Corp 1502 (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),I, Nitin Amersey, herebycertify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

 

|   | (1) | The Report fully complies  with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange  Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

|   | (2) | The information contained  in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition  and results of operations of the Company as of the date and for the periods  expressed in the Report. |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

| /s/ Nitin Amersey       |
|-------------------------|
| Nitin Amersey           |
| Chief Executive Officer |
|                    |
| November 15, 2010       |

 

 

 

The foregoing certification is being furnished solelypursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and is not being filed as part of the Reportor as a separate disclosure document.

 

 

----
#### James E. WASHINGTON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, County of Dade, Appellee.

No. 40258.

Supreme Court of Florida.

June 14, 1971.

Rehearing Denied July 7, 1971.

Appeal dismissed sua sponte.

CARLTON, Acting C. J., and ADKINS, BOYD, McCAIN and DEKLE, JJ., concur.
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Denali Commission","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.denali.gov","author_name":"Bryan Meshke","author_url":"https:\/\/www.denali.gov\/author\/bryan\/","title":"Our Staff","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"9zwibIivQz\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.denali.gov\/about\/our-staff\/\">Our Staff<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.denali.gov\/about\/our-staff\/embed\/#?secret=9zwibIivQz\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Our Staff” — Denali Commission\" data-secret=\"9zwibIivQz\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.denali.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/12\/village-banner.jpg","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":101}