alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 166 (Monday, August 27, 2018)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 43525]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-18480]



[[Page 43525]]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Department of the Army

32 CFR Part 508

[Docket ID: USA-2017-HQ-0010]
RIN 0702-AA83


Competition With Civilian Bands

AGENCY: Department of the Army, DoD.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This final rule removes the Department of the Army's 
regulation concerning participation of Army bands on and off post. This 
part has been superseded by requirements which direct appropriate 
participation of U.S. military bands on and off post. This part conveys 
internal Army policy and procedures and is unnecessary. Therefore, this 
part should be removed from the CFR.

DATES: This rule is effective on August 27, 2018.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jennifer Williams at 757-462-1060.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Public comment on the removal of 32 CFR part 
508 is not required because the regulation involves a matter relating 
to agency management and personnel, and because the regulation is a 
general statement of policy.
    DoD internal guidance will continue to be published in Army 
Regulation 220-90, ``Army Music,'' available at https://armypubs.army.mil/ProductMaps/PubForm/AR.aspx.
    This rule is not significant under Executive Order (E.O.) 12866, 
``Regulatory Planning and Review,'' therefore, E.O. 13771, ``Reducing 
Regulation and Controlling Regulatory Costs'' does not apply.

List of Subjects in 32 CFR Part 508

    Music, Utilization of Army bands.

PART 508--[REMOVED]

    Accordingly, by the authority of 5 U.S.C. 301, 32 CFR part 508 is 
removed.

Brenda S. Bowen,
Army Federal Register Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. 2018-18480 Filed 8-24-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 5001-03-P
257 La. 982

#### Robert C. GRAHAM, Individually and for and in Behalf of the Minor, Sue Nell Graham v. AMERICAN CASUALTY COMPANY OF READING, PENNSYLVANIA, et al.

No. 51201.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

March 10, 1971.

In re: Robert C. Graham and Sue Nell Graham applying for certiorari or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal First Circuit, Parish of East Baton Rouge. 244 So. 2d 372.

It is ordered that the writ of review issue; that the Court of Appeal send up the record in duplicate of the case; and that counsel for plaintiff and defendant be notified.
# C_2015425EN.01002001.xml

| 18.12.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 425/20 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.12.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 425/20

---

Notice of the impending expiry of certain anti-dumping measures

(2015/C 425/13)

1.   As provided for in Article 11(2) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009 of 30 November 2009 (1) on protection against dumped imports from countries not members of the European Community, the Commission gives notice that, unless a review is initiated in accordance with the following procedure, the anti-dumping measures mentioned below will expire on the date mentioned in the table below.

1

2.   Procedure

Procedure

Union producers may lodge a written request for a review. This request must contain sufficient evidence that the expiry of the measures would be likely to result in a continuation or recurrence of dumping and injury. Should the Commission decide to review the measures concerned, importers, exporters, representatives of the exporting country and Union producers will then be provided with the opportunity to amplify, rebut or comment on the matters set out in the review request.

3.   Time limit

Time limit

Union producers may submit a written request for a review on the above basis, to reach the European Commission, Directorate-General for Trade (Unit H-1), CHAR 4/39, 1049 Brussels, Belgium (2) at any time from the date of the publication of the present notice but no later than three months before the date mentioned in the table below.

2

4.   This notice is published in accordance with Article 11(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009.

| Product | Country(ies) of origin or exportation | Measures | Reference | Date of expiry (3) |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Ceramic tiles | The People’s Republic of China | Anti-dumping duty | Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 917/2011 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty and collecting definitively the provisional duty imposed on imports of ceramic tiles originating in the People’s Republic of China (OJ L 238, 15.9.2011, p. 1). | 16.9.2016 |

Product

Country(ies) of origin or exportation

Measures

Reference

Date of expiry (3)

3

Ceramic tiles

The People’s Republic of China

Anti-dumping duty

Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 917/2011 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty and collecting definitively the provisional duty imposed on imports of ceramic tiles originating in the People’s Republic of China (OJ L 238, 15.9.2011, p. 1).

16.9.2016

---

(1)  OJ L 343, 22.12.2009, p. 51.

1

(2)  TRADE-Defence-Complaints@ec.europa.eu

2

(3)  The measure expires at midnight of the day mentioned in this column

3

---
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

WILBUR G. METZ,

 Appellant,

v.

MAURICE W. SULLIVAN AND

KATHRYN G. CROSBY, TRUSTEES OF

THE SULLIVAN/CROSBY TRUST,

 Appellees. 

§

§

§

§

§

§

No. 08-09-00294-CV

Appeal from

County Court at Law No 5

of El Paso County, Texas

(TC # 2008-4055)

MEMORANDUM OPINION

This appeal is before the Court on its own motion to determine whether it should be

dismissed. Because Appellant has not filed a brief or a motion for extension of time, we dismiss the

appeal for want of prosecution.

On March 24, 2011, the Clerk of this Court notified Appellant that his brief was past due and

that no motion for extension of time had been received. The Clerk also informed the parties of the

Court’s intent to dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution unless, within ten days of the notice, a

party responded showing grounds to continue the appeal. To this date, no one has responded to the

Clerk’s letter.

This Court has the authority to dismiss an appeal for want of prosecution when the appellant

has failed to file his brief in the time prescribed and gives no reasonable explanation for the failure

to do so. TEX.R.APP.P. 38.8(a)(1); Elizondo v. City of San Antonio, 975 S.W.2d 61, 63 (Tex.App.--

San Antonio 1998, no pet.). Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. 
May 11, 2011 

ANN CRAWFORD McCLURE, Justice

Before Chew, C.J., McClure, and Rivera, JJ.
#### STATE of Florida, Appellant, v. Willie D. BARNES, Appellee.

No. 1592.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Fourth District.

Nov. 17, 1967.

Appeal from Court of Record, Broward County; Douglas S. Lambeth, Judge.

Appeal dismissed.
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3982 Engrossed in House (EH)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 3982

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To amend the Marine Protection, Research, and Sanctuaries Act of 1972 
          to prohibit the ocean dumping of radioactive waste.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Ocean Radioactive Dumping Ban Act of 
1994''.

SEC. 2. AMENDMENTS TO THE OCEAN DUMPING ACT.

    The Marine Protection, Research, and Sanctuaries Act of 1972 (33 
U.S.C. 1401 et seq.) is amended--
            (1) in section 3 (33 U.S.C. 1402), by--
                    (A) striking paragraph (j); and
                    (B) redesignating the following paragraphs 
                accordingly;
            (2) by altering any reference to the paragraphs 
        redesignated under paragraph (1) of this Act;
            (3) in section 102(a) (33 U.S.C. 1412(a)), by striking 
        ``high-level'' before ``radioactive waste''; and
            (4) in section 104 (33 U.S.C. 1414), by striking subsection 
        (i).

SEC. 3. CLARIFICATION.

    Nothing in this Act shall affect the transportation of material 
containing de minimis levels of radioactivity for the purpose of 
dumping it into ocean waters under the Marine Protection, Research, and 
Sanctuaries Act of 1972.

            Passed the House of Representatives May 23, 1994.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.

  
  
  
103d CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 3982

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To amend the Marine Protection, Research, and Sanctuaries Act of 1972 
          to prohibit the ocean dumping of radioactive waste.
```
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION





In connection with the periodic report of OverNear, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Fred E. Tannous, Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer) and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer) of the Company, hereby certify as of the date hereof, solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code, that to the best of my knowledge:





(1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and





(2)       The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates and for the periods indicated.





Date: August 4, 2011
/s/ Fred E. TannousFred E. TannousChief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer) and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer)
Exhibit 21.1

Subsidiaries
of the Company.

MedicaLogic
of Texas, Inc. (Delaware)
MedicaLogic S.A. (Switzerland)
MSCP Holdings, Inc. (Delaware) (formerly known as Medscape, Inc.)
MedicaLogic Enterprises, Inc. (Delaware) (formerly known as Medscape Enterprises, Inc.)
MedicaLogic Pennsylvania, LLC (Delaware) (formerly known as Medscape Pennsylvania, LLC)
MedicaLogic Texas, LP (Texas) (formerly known as Medscape Texas, LP)
Medscape U.K. Limited (U.K.)

---
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 170 (Friday, August 31, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Page 44612]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-18947]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. ER18-2310-000]


Supplemental Notice That Initial Market-Based Rate Filing 
Includes Request for Blanket Section 204 Authorization: Rose Wind 
Holdings, LLC

    This is a supplemental notice in the above-referenced proceeding 
Rose Wind Holdings, LLC's application for market-based rate authority, 
with an accompanying rate tariff, noting that such application includes 
a request for blanket authorization, under 18 CFR part 34, of future 
issuances of securities and assumptions of liability.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest should file with the 
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE, Washington, 
DC 20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's 
Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). Anyone 
filing a motion to intervene or protest must serve a copy of that 
document on the Applicant.
    Notice is hereby given that the deadline for filing protests with 
regard to the applicant's request for blanket authorization, under 18 
CFR part 34, of future issuances of securities and assumptions of 
liability, is September 17, 2018.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and 
interventions in lieu of paper, using the FERC Online links at http://www.ferc.gov. To facilitate electronic service, persons with internet 
access who will eFile a document and/or be listed as a contact for an 
intervenor must create and validate an eRegistration account using the 
eRegistration link. Select the eFiling link to log on and submit the 
intervention or protests.
    Persons unable to file electronically should submit an original and 
5 copies of the intervention or protest to the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE, Washington, DC 20426.
    The filings in the above-referenced proceeding are accessible in 
the Commission's eLibrary system by clicking on the appropriate link in 
the above list. They are also available for electronic review in the 
Commission's Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an 
eSubscription link on the website that enables subscribers to receive 
email notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). 
For assistance with any FERC Online service, please email 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#31777463727e5f5d585f54624441415e434571575443521f565e47"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="f6b0b3a4b5b9989a9f9893a5838686998482b690938495d8919980">[email protected]</span></a>, or call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For 
TTY, call (202) 502-8659.

    Dated: August 27, 2018.
Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2018-18947 Filed 8-30-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
### The Honorable William R. Wilson, Jr., Un ited States District 1 

### Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas, adopting the rep ort and recommendations of the Honorable Henry L. Jones, Jr., UnitedStates Magistrate Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas. ___________ No. 96-2385

___________ Thomas Grady, * * Appellant, * * v. * * M. Aud, CO-I Officer, Cummins * Appeal from the United States Unit, Arkansas Department of * District Court for the Correction; Blankenship, * Eastern District of Arkansas. Disciplinary Court Judge, * Cummins Unit, Arkansas * [UNPUBLISHED] Department of Correction; M.D. * Reed, Warden, Cummins Unit, * Arkansas Department of * Correction, * * Appellees. *

___________ Submitted: June 27, 1996 Filed: July 12, 1996

___________ Before BOWMAN, HEANEY, and BEAM, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM.
Arkans as inmate Thomas Grady brought a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 actio n against prison officials, alleging they deprived him of good-time credit based on a false prison disciplinary. The district court dismisse d 1 Grad y's claim as frivolous, citing Heck v. Humphrey , 114 S. Ct. 236 4 (1994). Grady appeals.

### -2- After the district court ruled, we held that Heckbars section 1983 damage claims for los s of good-time credit until the claimant has had the disciplinary proceeding invalidated. Sheldon v. Hundley , 83 F.3d 231, 233 (8th Cir. 1996). Absent any allegation that Grady has successfull y challe ngedthe disciplinary decision, his claim is not cognizable unde r section 1983.
Accordingly, the district court's judgment is affirmed. See8t h Cir. R. 47B.
A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
Electronically FiledIntermediate Court of AppealsCAAP-11-000039629-MAY-201308:25 AM
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Finance and Accounting Service Providing payment services for the U.S. Department of Defense

Search
Search

Search

              - 
              - 
              - 
              - 
              - 

-  Military Member		 
-  Retired Military & Annuitant		 
-  Civilian Employee		 
-  Contractor & Vendor		 

Homedebtandclaimsmilitarydebtsactivedutymilitary

**866-912-6488 **Mon-Fri:7:30 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. ESTContact UsPrivacy Information

askDFAS

                        - Make a Payment
                        - Installment Payments
                        - Education Debt Information                            - Types of Education Debts
                          - Student Deferment
                          More
                        - Waivers and Remissions                            - Current or Former Military
                          - Retiree
                          - Annuitants
                          - Civilian Employees
                          - Former Spouse
                          - Completing Your Application
                          - Finance Officials - Waivers
                          - Finance Officials - Remissions
                          More
                        - Check Payment Status
                        - Update Mailing Address
                        - Travel Advance Debts
                        - Protesting Your Debt                            - Base Level Debt
                          - Non Base Level
                          More
                        - Payment in Arrears                            - Submitting a Claim
                          - Disability Severance Tax Refunds
                          More
                        - Correction of Records
                        - Bankruptcy
                        - Failure to Pay a Debt
                        - Frequently Asked Questions

## CURRENT MILITARY SERVICE MEMBER
#### James Coston HOLLINGSHEAD, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. T-294.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

April 11, 1974.

Richard W. Ervin, III, Public Defender, and David J. Busch, Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., and Richard W. Prospect, Asst. Atty. Gen., for ap-pellee.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant seeks reversal of a sentencing order wherein he was sentenced to serve five years imprisonment, the maximum sentence for the offense of which he was convicted, without credit for approximately four months time previously spent in jail.

Allowance of credit for time served in jail prior to sentencing is now mandatory. Ch. 73-71, Laws of Florida, 1973, amending F.S. § 921.161(1), F.S.A. While said amendment did not become effective until after appellant herein was sentenced, an appellate court will apply the law which obtains at the time the appeal is decided in determining the correctness of the order or judgment before it. Joins v. State, 287 So.2d 742 (Fla.App.1st, 1974).

Accordingly, the order of sentencing is reversed with directions that the trial court resentence appellant, giving due credit for the time earlier spent in jail, or the trial court may enter an order reducing the sentence without calling the defendant back before the court.

Reversed with directions.

SPECTOR, Acting C. J., and JOHNSON and BOYER, JJ., concur.
----

Removal from the register of Case C-237/03 (1)

(2004/C 300/72)

By order of 22 July 2004 the President of the Court of Justice of the European Communities has ordered the removal from the register of Case C-237/03 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the tribunal d'instance de Roubaix): SA Banque Sofinco v Daniel Djemoui, Carole Djemoui.

----

(1)OJ C 184 du 2.8.2003.

----
I

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 3934

To amend title 28, United States Code, to provide that district courts give

notice of default judgments to the parties against whom such judgments

are entered.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 1, 1994

Mr. SWETT introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee

on the Judiciary

A BILL

To amend title 28, United States Code, to provide that

district courts give notice of default judgments to the

parties against whom such judgments are entered.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That chapter 125 of title 28, United States Code, is

4 amended—

5 (1) by adding at the end the following:

6 ‘‘§ 1965. Notice of entry of default judgment

7 ‘‘A district court, upon the entry of a default judg8 ment, shall give notice to the party against whom such

9 judgment is entered.’’; and
2

•HR 3934 IH

1 (2) in the table of sections at the beginning, by

2 adding at the end the following new item:

‘‘1965. Notice of entry of default judgment.’’.

Æ
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                          21,417
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                           5,000
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    113,446
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                        559,226
<ALLOWANCE>                                      8,475
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 724,997
<DEPOSITS>                                     545,497
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                             19,537
<LONG-TERM>                                    113,020
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        15,308
<OTHER-SE>                                      31,635
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 724,997
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 46,135
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                6,996
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                     0
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                53,131
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                              23,462
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              29,601
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           23,530
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                    5,615
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                 185
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                 24,976
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  8,209
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       8,209
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     5,267
<EPS-BASIC>                                       1.36
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.34
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    8.25
<LOANS-NON>                                      2,078
<LOANS-PAST>                                       514
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                11,991
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                   10,547
<RECOVERIES>                                     1,416
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                8,475
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             8,475
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0


</TABLE>