From: Pitts, Tony To: Hancy, Cindy Wang Cc: Evans, Craig ; Gross, Stephen (DEP) Subject: Chromium Info: RRDonnelly Date: Monday, March 07, 2011 2:58:41 PM Attachments: RRDonnelly.pdf

Cindy, Attached is the information received from R.R. Donnelly.

This should be the last of them. If you need anything else, feel free to contact me. Tony Tony A. Pitts | Air Quality Program Specialist Division of Permits | Air Toxics and Risk Assessments Department of Environmental Protection Rachel Carson State Office Building 400 Market Street | Harrisburg, PA 17101 Phone: 717.772.3364 | Fax: 717.772.2303 www.depweb.state.pa.us216 Greenfield Road Lancaster, PA 17601 www.rrdonnelley.com 

# RR. D ONNELLEY

February 24, 2011 Mr. Tony A. Pitts Air Quality Program Specialist Division of Permits Air Toxics and Risks Assessments Department of Environmental Protection Rachel Carson State Office Building 400 Market Street Harrisburg, PA 17101

Dear Mr. Pitts: Enclosed, please find the requested Chromium Electroplating Information for RR Donnelley, Lancaster East Plant. Also enclosed is the complete emission test report from the October 25, 2005 test.

•



## If you have any questions or should require any additional information, please contact me at (717)293-2056. Sincerely, 

# s l'e- fr y- g tiosimA--

Stacey Haefner EHS Professional

## Data Needed on Chromium Electroplating and Anodizing Facilities

Facility Data Name — RR Donnelley Lancaster East Facility 

## Location — 216 Greenfield Road Lancaster, PA 17601 

## Number of employees — approximately 950 

## Type of electroplating facility (i.e., job shop, captive operation) — Batch operation consisting of cylinder plating, cylinder removal, and cylinder replacement 

## Hours of operation — 24 hrs/day, 7 days/week 8760 hours/yr 

## Annual revenue - Process Type(s) Hard chromium electroplating : Hard Cr Electroplating 

## Decorative chromium electroplating Trivalent chromium electroplating Chromium anodizing Other electroplating Other co-located processes subject to NESHAP Tank Design and Operation- Two (2) Chrome Plating tanks, manufactured by K Walter 

## Dimensions — length and width: 27.75 ft x 4.48 ft 

## Rectifier capacity — 20000 Amp; No limits on rectifier operation 

## Annual hours of operation Permitted — No limits on annual operating hours Actual —Typical: 

### Tank 1 = 1106.73 hrs Tank 2 = 1127.98 hrs Year 2010 

## Emission Control Technology Type of control method or control device — Composite mesh pad system with in-line mist eliminators and HEPA filter 

## Exhaust system design (hood type/location, exhaust flow rate) — Hood Type: Moveable On Top w/Fixed Duct Upper Tank Rear 

## Control device operating parameters (e.g., bath surface tension) — Pressure drop of HEPA filter


## Emission Test Data Complete test report (if available)- See Attached 

## Other Available Supporting Documents Emission inventory report Permit applicationOperating permitProcess flow diagram or sketch of plant layout

## RR DONNELLEY LANCASTER, PENSYLVANIA

STATIONARY SOURCE

SAMPLING REPORT

EMISSIONS TESTING FOR: TOTAL CHROMIUM

Prepared for:

MR. DAVID YORK RR DONNELLEY 216 GREENFIELD ROAD LANCASTER, PENNSYLVANIA 17601

Prepared by:

AIR MONITORING SPECIALLSTS, INC. PADEP # 68-03580
22 RODMAN ROAD
RICHMOND, VIRGINIA 23224



## Project:

CHROME PLATING TANK CONTROL DEVICE STACK TESTS



## Test Date: OCTOBER 25, 2005

11/22/2005

## Signature: ore-n4 2.71 2-0445 Bruce k Gerber President Air Monitoring Specialists, Inc. Date: REPORT CERTIFICATION



## The sampling and analysis performed for this report were carried out under my direction and supervision, and I hereby certify that, to the best of my knowledge, the test report is authentic and accurate.TABLEOFCONTENTS

PAGE 

## 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1 1.1 Background 1 1.2 Outline of Test Program 1 1.3 Test Participants 1

2.0 SUMMARY OF RESULTS 2 Table 2-1 Total Chromium Emission and Process Data Summary 2 2:1 Presentation 3 2.1:1 Chrotnium Emissions Summary 4 2.1 .2 Example Calculations 5

3.0 PROCESS DESCRIPTION AND OPERATION 6
4.0 SAMPLING AND ANALYTICAL PROCEDURES 11 41 General 11 4.2 Sampling Points 11 4.3 Volumetric Air Flow Rates 11 4.3.1 Exhaust Gas Velocity 11 4.3.2 Exhaust Gas Composition 11 4.4 Emissions Determinations 11 4.4.1 Total Chromium 11 4.5 Equipment Calibration 12

5.0 QUALITY ASSURANCE/QUALITY CONTROL 12 5.1 General 12 5.2 Preventive Maintenance and Equipment Calibration 13 5.3 Sample Processing 13 5.4 Instrument Calibration 14 5.5 Blanks and Spikes 14 5.6 Internal/External System Audit Checks 15 5.7 Data Reduction and Validation 15 5.8 QA/QC Summary 16

APPENDICES


## A Laboratory Data B Field Data C Calibration Data D Process Data

11/22/2005

### Chrome Plating Tank Outlet Chrome Plating Tank Outlet EPA 306 EPA 306 October 25, 2005 October 25, 2005 RRD-M306-2 RRD-M306-3



## TEST PARTICIPANTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION

1.1 BACKGROUND 

## R.R. Donnelley has hired Air Monitoring Specialist, Inc. (AMS) to conduct a test to quantify. total chromium emissions from the printing cylinder chrome plating operation at their facility located in Lancaster, Pennsylvania.

1.2 OUTLINE OF TEST PROGRAM Stationary source sampling was performed on October 25, 2005 at the exit stack of the chrome plating tank system. Table 1-1 is a test log that presents the sampling locations, sampling objectives, sampling methods, test dates, and run numbers for the test program.

TABLE 1-1 TEST LOG

1.3 TEST PARTICIPANTS 

## Table 1-2 lists the personnel involved in the test program.

TABLE 1-2

1 11/22/05

## 2.0 SUMMARY OF RESULTS

TABLE 2-1 Total Chromium Emission and Process Data Summary Hard Chromium Electroplating Tanks 3&4
TEST DATE 10/25/05 10/25/05 10/25/05

TEST RUN NUMBER RRD-M306-1 RRD-M306-2 RRD-M306-3

TEST 'TIMES 08:05-10:07 11:34-13:36 13:43-15:47

ELAPSED SAMPLING T11%IE 120 120 120

Process and Control Device Data Summary Average
Pmure Drop Across System, (in L120) 3.2 3.2 3.2 3.2

Tanks 3 & 4 Rectifier Rated Capacity, (amperage) 20,000 20,000 20,000 N/A

Tank 3 Rectifier Capacity, (amperage) 12,200 12,200 12,200 12,200

Tank 4 Rectifier Capacity, (amperage) 11,560 11,560 14,667 12.596

Sampling/Stack Data Summary Average 02 Concentration, (% by volume, dry) 20.9 20.9 20.9 20.9 CO2 Concentration, (% by volume, dry) 0 0 0 0 Sample Volume, (dscf) 120.119 108.245 108.970 112.445

2 11/22/05

## Required Sample Volume, (dscf) 72 72 72 N/A
Stack Gas Moisture, (%) 1.89 2.17 207 2.04 Stack Gas Temperature, ("F) 87.4 79.6 79.1 82.0
Volumetric Flow rate, (dscfm) 4983.1 4582.0 4613.4 4726.2
Isokinetic Rate, (%) 102.92 100.86 100.85 101.54
Permitted Isokinetic Rate, (%) 90-110 90-110 90-110 N/A

Toatal Chromium Emission Results Average Total Chromium Emission Catch, (mg) 0.00977 0.006145 0.00621 0.0074
Total Chromium Emission Rate, (lb/hr) 0.000054 0.000034 0.000035 0.000041

Total Chromium Emission Concentration, (gr/dscf) 0.0000013 0.0000009 0.0000009 0.0000010

Total Chromium Emission Concentration, (mg/dscm) 0.00287 0.002 0.00201 0.00230

Allowable Total Chromium Emission Concentration, (mg/dscm) 0.015 0.015 0.015 0.015

2.1 PRESENTATION The average total chromium concentration in the stack gas from the composite mesh pad control system controlling the chrome-plating tank during the compliance test at the Lancaster Facility was 0.0023 milligram total chromium per dry standard cubic meter (mg/dscm). Table 2.1.1 presents the emission rates and concentrations for the test program. Table 2.1.2 contains example calculations. Appendix A contains the laboratory data. Appendix B contains the field data and Appendix C contains the calibration data. Appendix D contains the process data

3 11/22/05

### 2.1.1 CHROMIUM EMMISIONS SUMMARY

'Chromium Su p pling Train Calculations Client It it Donnelley Project Lancaster, PA Date: October 25, 2005 SCRUBBER OUTLET--

Test Number. RRD-M306-1 RRD-M306-2A RRD-M306-3 Averages Pitot Tube Calibration Factor 0.84 0.84 0.84 Meter Calibration Factor. 1.031 1.031 1.031 Start Time: 08:05 11:34 13:43 Stop Time 

### 10:07 13:36 15:47 Stack Diameter, inches: 18 18 18 Nozzle Diameter, inches: 0251 0.251 0.251 Barometric Pressure, inches mercury. 29.78 29.8 29.79 Static Pressure in Stack, Inches Water. -0.26 -023 -027 -025 Duration of Sample, minutes: 120 120 120 Meter Leak Rate, CFM: 0 0.000 0.000 Meter Start Volume, CF: 313.564 497334 603.629 Meter Final Volume, CF: 428.976 603.341 710.575 Average Meter Pressure, Inches Water. 3.044 2.538 2.563 2.715 Average Meter Temperature, degrees F: 64.5 743 75.3 71.4 Average Sqrt Velocity Pressure: 0.8688 0.7947 0.7993 0.8209 Stack Gas Temperature, degrees F: 87.4 79.6 79.1 82.0 Percent Carbon Dioxide: 0 0 0 0 Percent Oxygen: 20.9 20.9 20.9 20.9 Percent Carbon Monoxide: 0 0 

### o 0 Liquid Volume Collected, milliliters: 48.8 50.6 48.6 493 Total Weight of Chromium, Milligrams: 0.00977 0.006145 0.00621 0.0074 'Sample Train Calculations Meter Volume, 

### Actual: 115.412 106.007 106.946 109.455 Meter Volume, STP: 

### 120.119 108245 108.970 112.445 Meter Volume, STP (68 deg. 

### F, 29.92 in. 

### HA 3.402 

### 3.065 3.086 3.18 Volume 

### of Water Vapor Condensed, CF: 

### 2313 2.398 2304 2338 Total.Gas Sampled, CF: 

### 122432 110.643 111274 114.783 Percent Moisture: 

### 1.89 2.17 2.07 2.04 Area of Stack, Square Feet 

### 1.767 1.767 1.767 Density Dry 

### at STP: 

### 0.0746 0.0746 0.0746 0.0746 Density Wet at STP: 

### 0.0740 0.0739 0.0740 0.0740 Density Wet at Stack Cond: 0.0713 0.0723 0.0724 0.0720 bokinetic, V.: 102.92 100.86 100.85 101.5412 Molecular Weight, lb/lb-Mole: 28.84 28 84 28 84 28.84
IV .0 and BOW °ambitions Average Stack Gas Velocity, FPM: 

### 2,995.7 2,721.0 2,735.6 2,817.4 Stack Gas Flow Rate, ACFM: 

### 5,293.9 4,8083 4,8342 4,978.8 Stack 

### Gas Velodly, SCFM: 

### 5,079.1 4,683.6 4,711.0 4,824.5 Stack Gas Velocity, DSCFM: 

### 4,983.1 4,582.0 4,613.4 4,7262
laronahun Calculadons: Grains Per DSCF: 

### 1254E-06 8.753E-07 8.787E-07 1.003E-06 LBS/FIR: 

### 5.356E-05 3.438E-05 3.475E-05 4.090E-05 mg/DSCM 0.00287 0.00200 0.00201 0.00230 Standard Conditions 68 degrees F 29.92 inches Hg



### 11/22/2005am:tumm y ° 31:11181/X3 Zet1+091= : sa ' pylo ns 

### s up pm srasatt0'0= , Vaualm.°3 " IS A Ja P r

Ati o agarA OZEI*ZE3Z01 nun * Y i 

### n -11 1 86

- 62 lap SOLIS Inn•INAJninn 6Z.S.LSA096+61$3)/8ZSMZE6ZAZ10+9TI/81 ;ELS ‘ ninn I n A =PIS 9IH-LI1:1= :111nPV 4010• PA sin811 191/9ZEI= 000U96Hs09.6111=, OVE11-00141£11000/(00I*000L.(0001/9t9) $ 14 w e n , afar 

### a nanan P 89 nun PIP •0 3 lumPonSS INaMlighn

REH/SWI : aasa J a a riarao

StEla001/GCEI-000 41 7 11A099+1 rafIZA466Z1(ZIEI-149'81/£10Th= SC11.£111-- 98•OZHA(ICEI)111609600= 1 111/13S0 4 4P 6•91319S : MOS `i1P0P *PA 1

A ne n ann : Piaav 

### * a u Iso m swavins q

4P 0 PA n0 9 1 1" 5 16 anans11 0410 11 • P O PL) SO U P a IIMPAI
6981491:13-= IRSSEL013•EIE61 Z1114041.411:1•0£S446IAZAU1111),01.1M/KEE8.(099-1I ZU/46"6Z*001)).= LEEIAZ66Z/09II/t110+Z ItIB•0099-1-1Z11)/0£0= (001/1113).i940'04001/(17£11-001))49£2).= ooli g vu.o . o.acaa-zza-ooraitza,Lci ta+(eza,L280.0) (4ti(ZAvoiti)) * Okfl- oote(Evaaca

swa p autea upui

tun n unn I3.1 0 WM11111101 nin nO1In a l 13 1 23 11 0 3 0m M 

### Wen :approuoyi omptra Pantaa =ACE° ;wand .oppong Dogma Anna
saa g ap hnoendusaj, no rnn nann1 41 /*WA 1 6 8 nannAV :g matilop l anstradt p ai, nn aSensv 1 1 1 1W = P a l tunss a l 

### a Wow? : 13 caum I n A la n d "PIN 

### 33 ' omo 1 0 A Ing181Snll
: N.33 ' WI 1 117 1 "PP1 32 I nu l uib l dUV SJ O unIP1InCI
3 218/Yi In S 311 1 V MS n ! unanal d n9n18 :Amman iptiout 'among °mamma

=

A PS gin P uln 93 012201%1 :saga! trasunna Imo :alum dov mi ni MS -30P g 3 M a xi 4 t 3 AVIS

- 10

P

n t1 no nInn Er n a *SAL 1011d zalinnO/1821
SOK ` CZ nn i n 1 3 0 "WU

va sa n noun l :PaFnIcl
"H anun G 71 -a 703113

nun O n I nn I • 3 • 1 • 11 2• 11 na S 1.0111110.014 LL600.0 811, 0
0
8898'0

C179 not 9L61Z4 P9StIE 0 OZI 9t0- 8t6Z ICZ-0 81 LOOT 5080 I£01 17W0 -9011X-Mal 1 0 141- 1 111 1 11*1 2 PA1 anlonatnIS 63112•11041 : P O D / F

I RS V I PM Anaa : 

### as i n Pm 

### Irma P h 

### a Lamina n an d anab S 4 1 3n 8S1 0 WV

## 3.0 PROCESS DESCRIPTION AND OPERATION OF CHROMIUM PLATING TANKS AT LANCASTER EAST 

## The sources tested were two (2) hard chromium-electroplating tanks, manufactured by K. Walter Corporation (Plan Approval Source ID 401). Both plating tanks can be operated simultaneously. The tanks are used to plate a thin layer of chromium, approximately 7 microns, onto the engraved copper surface of gravure printing cylinders for wear and corrosion resistance. A non-production or "dummy" 100" cylinder was plated in Tank #3. Plating times ranged from 14 minutes to 18 minutes. The average plating time in tank #3 was about 16 minutes. The rated rectifier capacity of tank #3 is 20,000 amps. The average rectifier capacity of tank #3 during the test was 12,200 amps. Production cylinders were plated in tank #4. One hundred inch (100") and one hundred thirty-one inch (131") cylinders were plated during the test periods. Plating 

## times ranged from 15 minutes to 18 minutes. The average plating time for these cylinders in tank #4 was about 17 tninutes. The rated rectifier capacity of tank #4 is 20,000 amps. The average rectifier capacity of tank #4 during the test was 12,596 amps The plating operation is a batch operation consisting of cylinder plating, cylinder removal, and cylinder replacement. The overall average time, in which there was no plating, was about 15.5% of the time or about 9 minutes per hour. The overall average percent of time when one cylinder was being plated was 43.4% of the tune or about 26 minutes per hour. The overall average percent of time when two cylinders were being plated was 41.1% of the time or about 25 minutes per hour.

### 15.5% 

## of the time not 11.3% plating (during cylinder change out, replacement, etc. 18.8%



## 56.4% 43.4% of the time plating one Linder 27.9% 45.9%



## 32.3% 41.1% of the time plating two cylinders 55.7% 35.3%
Almost 10 cylinders total 

## 10 cylinders total during a two hour run (eight 100 inch cylinders and two 131 inch tinders almost 11 cylinden total


### (all 100 inch cylinders)

20,000 amps 20,000 amps

12,200 amp 

## 20,000 amps

12,200 amps 12,200 maps

20,00 0 amps 20,000 saps 

## 20,000 amps

11,560 amps 14,667 amps 

## 12,5% amps



## 11/22/05 The following table summarizes the plating operation during the test:

# Tank 3 I 8:05 8:15 830 8:46 9:00 9:15 9:30
plating nonproduction 

### 6 4 

# 1
2

"dummy" cylinders 815 8-18 822 8:40 825 9:01 9:05 920 9:22 9:38 100" 100" cy5nder 9170 

# Tank 4 100" 100" 100"

Plating production I woln not 

### 4 11 cylinders Plane 8:18 8:25 8:42 8:50 9:08 9:10 927 9:40 9:58 100* 9:45 10:00 10:07

11

12 9:38 925 10:07

11:30 11:45 1200 1215 1230 1245 tea 1:15

;11:34

10 7 

### 1127 11:63 me rzts 100' tar
31 min not plating 

## I_ I

11:2411:

100- cylinder

size 120 12,

7 1225 1243 1245 121 122 128 125 100" 100 100" 10r

12-08 1220 100" 1240 1256 1259 1:15
ror lar ras 11:34 

### The following are timelines of the plating process during the three 

# RUN #1 (1012512005 from 8:05 to 10:07 AM) or 122 minutes

plating no cylimders: 8:16 & 8:42-8:45=3 & 9:56-10:07=11 20 minutes or 16.4% plating one cylinder: 8:22-8:25 = 3 & 8:40 -8:42=2 & 8:45-8:5 5 & 9:01-9:05= 4 & 9:06- 9:10 = 4 & 920-9:22 = 2 & 9:27-9:311 & 9:38-9:40 = 2 & 9:55-9:56=1 34 minutes plating one cylinder or 27.9% plating two finders: 8:058:1111 & 8:25-8:40 = 15 &8:509:01 = 11 & 9:05-9:06 = 1 & 9:10-9:20=10 & 9:22-9:27=5 & 9:40-9:55=15 68 minutes plating two cylinders or 55.7% 

# RUN #2A (10/25/2005 from 11:34 AM to 1:36 PM or 122 minutes)
11:15 

# Tank 3plating nonproduction "dummy" cylinders 

# Tank 4

plating production cylinders


### plating no cylinders: 11:36-11:37=1 & 11:53-12:010 & 12:20-12:25 & 1:18-1:25=7 23 minutes or 18.8% plating one cylinder: 11:34-11:36=2 & 11:37-11:53=16 & 12:03-12:02 & 12:18-12:20 = '2 & 12:25-12:40=.15 & 12

. 43-12:45 = 2& 1256-12:52 & 1:01-1:02=1 & 1:15-1:18=3 & 1:25-1:36*11 56 minutes plating one 

### cylinder or 45.9% plating two cylinders: 12:05-12:18 = 13& 12:40-12:43=3 & 12:45


### - 12:56=11 & 12:58


### - 1:01=3 

### & 1:02-1:15=13 43 minutes plating two cylinders or 35.3%

11/22/20052:45 320 220 Z-15 220 

## Tank 3 1:431'45 plating non production "dummy" cylinders 2
2.48 303 2 

# ELM 11 

# ta.

120 2:08 2:10 2:25 225 22$ 3:05 

## Tank 

# 4

plating production 100' cylinder

sin

37 ninn y ' pang 100

- 100" 100"

nin not plain. 

## tal4 V4 cylinders 2:20 229 322
100" 3:19 131" 315 3:30 345 347

3:19 322 3:33 3:40 3:55 100" 100" 1

13
322 13r 3.47 

## RUN #3(1012512005 from 1:43 to 3:47 PM) or 124 minutes

plating no cylimders • 

### 1 • 

### 43-1:517 & 2:08-2:1 

## 0= 2 & 2:46-2:48 

## = 2 & 3:19-3:22=3 14 minutes or 11.3% plating one cylinder: 1:50-2:08=18 & 2:10-2:210 & 2:25-2:29=4 & 2:38-2:46=8 & 2:48-3:02=14 & 3:03-3:05=2 & 3:22-3:32=10 & 3:36-3:40=4 70 minutes plating one cylinder or 56.4% plating two cylinders: 2:20-2:2 

## 5= 5 & 2:29-2:38=9 & 3:023:01 & 3:05-3:114 3:323:34 & 3:40-3:47=7 40 minutes plating two cylinders or 32.3%

EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM The chrome plating process generates a mist containing chromic acid. A fan draws room air into both plating tanks, through the emission control system, and exhausts the air to atmosphere. Midwest Air Products Co., Inc. (MAPCO) manufactures the chromium emission control system. Each tank is exhausted through a dedicated in-line MAPCO 3K mist eliminator. Air from each mist eliminator is then combined, directed to a MAPCO Ultra MACT 5K composite mesh pad system and high efficiency particulate filter (HEPA), through a constant speed fan, and out to atmosphere through a stack. The following 

### table summarizes the pressure 

### drops across the control system during the test

Run #1 

### Run #2 Run #3 Overall average Pressure drop 3.2 3.2 3.2 3.2 inches of water column

The following diagram illustrates the major components of the emission control system and the location of the pressure drop that was recorded during the test.



## 9 11/22/05ir ID Exhaust Stack

two 3" Sampleff reverse Ports. 90 degrees apart

Single speed



### ( Plating Tank 14 ezzanine

Plating Tank 193 Me Pd

nit 

# sr9 Pressure Gauge



### Plating Room RR Donnelley Lancaster East (2005)

10 11/22/05

### 4.0 SAMPLING AND ANALYTICAL PROCEDURES



## 4.1 GENERAL All sampling analytical procedures were those recommended by the United States Environmental Protection Agency. This section provides brief descriptions of the sampling and analytical procedures.



## 4.2 S AM 

## PL ING 

## P OINTS 

## The number and location of the sampling points were determined according to the procedures outlined in EPA Method 1. The stack cross sections were divided into equal areas with equal points on each traverse axis. The field data sheet for the traverse location can be found in Appendix B of this report.

4.3 VoLumEnttc Am F LOW 

## R ATES 

### 4.3.1 Exhaust 

## Gas Velocity The exhaust gas velocity and volumetric flow rate were determined according to the procedures outlined in EPA Method 2. Velocity head measurements (delta P) were made using Type S Pitot tubes conforming to the geometric specifications outlined in EPA Method 2. Accordingly, each has been assigned a coefficient of 0.84. Differential pressures weremeasured with an oil manometer. Exhaust gas temperatures were measured with chromelalumel thermocouples equipped with digital readouts.
4.3.2 Exhaust Gas Composition The exhaust gas was assumed to be at ambient conditions 20.9 percent oxygen and 79.1 percent nitrogen.

4.4 EMISSIONS DETERMINATIONS 4.4.1 TOTAL CHROMIUM Sample Collection. 

## Samples were withdrawn isokinetically from the source using an EPA Method 306 sampling 

## train. The sampling train consisted of a glass nozzle, a heated glass probe with a Type S Pitot tube and Type K thermocouple attached, four chilled impingers, and a metering console. The first and second impingers each contained 100 ml of 0.5 N NaOH, the third remained empty, and the fourth contained pre-weighed silica gel. A schematic of the sampling train is located in Appendix B. Sample Recovery. 

## The pH of the impinger solution in the first impinger was measured at the conclusion of the test nm. The pH of the first impinger solution for the three test runs were

11 11/22/05

## 13, 12 and 12 The first, second and third impingers were weighed and the weights wererecorded on the sample recovery data form. The silica gel was returned to the original preweighed container, weighed, and the weight recorded on the sample recovery data sheet. The volume of water vapor condensed in the impingers and the volume of water vapor collected in the silica gel were summed and entered into moisture content calculations. The contents of the first impinger were transferred to a 500-mL sample bottle. The nozzle, probe, first impinger and all connecting glassware were rinsed three times with 0.5 N NaOH into the 500-mL sample bottle containing the contents of the first impinger. The contents of the second and third impinger were transferred to a second 500-mL sample bottle. The second and third impingers, along with the connecting glassware, were rinsed three times with 0.5 N NaOH into the second 500-mL sample bottle. The sample bottles were sealed with Teflon tape, the liquid level was marked and the sample information logged on the chain of custody form.

Sample Analysis. EPA Method 306 analytical procedures were used to analyze the samples for total chromium using ICP-MS as outlined in the method. Element One, Inc.(PADEP if 

## 683085) of Wilmington, NC, (910) 793-0128, analyzed the samples.
4.5 EQUIPMENT CALIBRATION Pertinent calibration data are provided in Appendix C.

5.0 QUALITY ASSURANCE/OUALITY CONTROL

5.1 GENERAL Air Monitoring Specialists, Inc (AMS) is committed to the continued implementation of a Quality Assurance Program to assure the quality of sampling and analytical procedures of environmental measurement data The Quality Assurance measures taken during this test project equal or exceed the minimum QA/QC recommendations as set forth by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) for a particular method. The following sections outline the QA program implemented by AMS to justify the validity of test procedures. As applicable, the QA system for the various test programs addresses the following areas: Preventive Maintenance & Equipment Calibration Sample Processing Analytical Instrument Calibration Blanks and Spiked Samples Internal/External System Checks

12 11/22/05

## • Data Reduction & Validation QA/QC Summary

5.2 

## P REVENTIVE 

## M AINTENANCE AND 

## EQ UIPMENT 

## C ALIBRATION 

## An effective preventive maintenance program decreases downtime and thus increases data completeness and quality. Pretest and posttest equipment calibrations are conducted in a manner and at a frequency, which meets or exceeds U.S. EPA specifications. Each item transported to the field is inspected to detect equipment problems that may originate during periods of storage. All equipment returning from the field is cleaned, repaired, reconditioned, and recalibrated as necessary. Routine maintenance on equipment (dry gas meters, pumps, manometers, Pitot tubes, and nozzles) is carried out periodically for leaks, corrosion, dents, or any other damage

5.3 

## S AMPLE 

## P ROCESSING 

## AMS employs systems that ensure the integrity of an environmental sample from the time of acquisition, through analysis, and ultimately to proper disposal. These systems are necessary to allow valid conclusions to be drawn from analytical results separated in time and space from the sampling operation. In addition, these systems recognize that samples are occasionally of value even after analytical results have been reported. Samples are collected, transported, and stored in clean containers that are constructed of materials inert to the analytical matrix. Containers are used which allow airtight seals. When necessary, containers are employed which prevent photochemical reactions. All sample containers are labeled with the following information: Unique source identifier Sample run identifier Analyte identifier Sample matrix identifier Sample analyst identifier Additional information relating to the sample is recorded on the data sheet for the sampling run that afforded the subject sample. Accordingly, the sampling data sheet contain , : 

## all the information listed above, plus the date and times the sample was acquired and supplemental information such as observations pertinent to the quality of the sample. For condensed samples, e.g., samples in liquid media, the sample levels are marked on the outside of the adjusting results accordingly.

13 11/22/05

## For transport from the field to the laboratory, samples are stored in sealed containers and secured in a fashion that minimizes movement and thus prevents breakage of containers. Containers used for transporting glass are packed with foam. Samples that require chilling are kept cold until analyzed. Samples remain in the custody of the sampler, from acquisition until conveyance to the sample custodian. All custody transfers are signed and documented on a record of custody form, which remains with the sample until turned over to the custodian. Analytical data are identified in a manner identical to that of the sampling data. Accordingly, all data generated from the analysis of samples are documented with the following information:

Source identifier Sample run identifier Analyte identifier Sample matrix identifier Analyst identifier Analysis date Portions of samples remaining after analysis are returned to their original sample containers. These samples are stored in designated storage areas until their destruction is authorized.

5.4 INSTRUMENT CALIBRATION Instrument calibration is one of the most important fimctions in generating precise and accurate quality data. All of the contract laboratories involved in the analytical testing for the test program maintain rigorous QA programs for instrument calibration.

5.5 BLANKS AND SPIKES Field blanks, method blanks, trip blanks, lab-proof blanks and filter blanks are obtained, digested and analyzed when applicable. The blanks reflect the background contamination obtained from the various sources during the sampling and analysis. Thus, data adjustment or correction can be made accordingly. In most cases, it is not necessary to digest and analyze the method blanks, reagent blanks, or the lab-proof blanks unless the field blank shows a high level of contamination. If a high level of contamination is present, it is imperative to individually analyze the above blanks to help determine the cause of contamination. Spiked samples are used to check on the performance
14 11/22/05

## of a routine analysis or the recovery efficiency of a method. During spiking, a known amount of stock solutions of the substance of interest is added to the sample prior to sample extraction, digestion, and analysis.

5.6 INTERNAL/EXTERNAL SYSTEM AUDIT CHECKS System and performance audits are routine elements of all AMS QA/QC programs. Internal Systems Audit: The following sampling equipment checks were conducted prior to sample collection. All sampling equipment was thoroughly checked to ensure clean and operable components. Equipment was inspected for possible damage from shipment. The oil manometers were leveled and zeroed. The temperature measurement systems were checked for damage and operability by Measuring the ambient temperature. Performance Audits: Performance audits of the laboratory are conducted prior to the processing of any compliance samples for analysis. Audit materials typically include samples available from the EPA prior to new source testing. In addition, samples of known concentration are prepared in-house or obtained from the EPA for Internal QA checks. External Systems Audits: AMS is subject to a system audit each time a test is conducted for any Air Pollution Control agency. This procedure entails an observer on-site to do qualitative evaluation of performance to demonstrate compliance with the applicable regulations.

5.7 DATA REDUCTION AND VALIDATION The test team leader is responsible for reviewing and validating data as they are acquired. Each team leader has extensive knowledge of sampling methodology and the characteristics of the process being measured and is capable of evaluating the accuracy, representativeness, and completeness of raw data on-site, Action to replace inadequate data can be taken immediately. Data obtained during calibrations and test runs are recorded on standardized forms that are checked twice for completeness and accuracy by the QA Director or his designated representative. Data reduction and consistency are achieved by using the standardized forms and using AMS's in-house computer facilities.

15 11/22/05

### 16 11/22/05 

## EPA Method 306: A blank sampling train was analyzed for chromium with 0.88 micrograms detected. 5.8 QA/QC SUMMARY All chemicals used were American Chemical Society (ACS), High Performance Liquid Chromatography (HPLC), or pesticide grade. The deionized, distilled water utilized met or exceeded the American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) specifications for Type-I reagent water. Pretest and posttest leak checks were conducted on each sampling train.

# Appendix A

Laboratory Data

# Air Monitoring Specialists 22 Rodman Road Richmond, VA 23224

Project ID: Mapco Scrubber

Total Chromium

EPA Method 306 Analysis

Analytical Report 6146



# ell Element One, Inc. 5022-C Wrightsville Av., Wilmington, 

## NC 28403 910-793-0128 FAX: 

## 910-792-6853 el lab@el lab.com

## 40

elissa L :
CIA Officer November 10, 2005 The following data for Analytical Report 6146 has been reviewed for completeness, accuracy, adherence to method protocol, and compliance with quality assurance guidelines.

Review by:

Report Reviewed and Finalized By:

Ken Smith, Laboratory Director November 10, 2005

elementOne

# SUMMARY OF RESULTS

• eleinentOne .••,..•:k•L;c5 ft1-3C16

## Summary of Analysis

Probe and First ImpingerSummary of Total Chromium Analysis

Element RRD-1 e6146-1 

## Total pg RRD-2 RRD-2 RRD-3 e6146-3 e6146-3 dup e6146-7 

## Total pg Total pg Total pg

Total Chromium 2.05 1.88 1.75 1.85

Element Second and Third ImpingerSummary of Total Chromium Analysis

RRD-1 RRD-2 RRD-3 RRD-3 RRD-Blank e6146-2 e6146-5 e6146-9 e6146-9 dup e6146-9 dup 

## Total pg Total pg Total pg Total pg Total pg

Total Chromium 7.72 6.38 4.23 4.36 0.88



## eiementOne

# ANALYTICAL NARRATIVE

elementOne

# Element One Analytical Narrative

Client: Air Monitoring Specialists Element One #: 6146 Client ID: Mapco Scrubber Analyst CMS Method: M306 Dates Received: 10/28/05 Analytes: Total Chromium Dates Analyzed: 11/04/05

Summary of Analysis The samples were prepared according to Method 306 protocol. Total Chromium was analyzed on a PerkinElmer ELAN 6100 ICP-MS.

Detection Limits The ICP-MS instrument reporting limit was 2.5pg/L for chromium.

Analysis QA/QC Duplicate analyses relative percent difference (RPD), spike sample recovery, and second source calibration verification data are summarized in the Quality Control Section. All QA/QC data was within the criteria of the method.

Additional Comments The reported results have not been corrected for any blank values or spike recovery values. Nothing unusual was noticed with any of the samples or analyses.

# QUALITY CONTROL SUMMARY

elementOne

## Summary of Quality Control Data

Total Chromium Duplicate Analysis RPD and Spike Recoveries (Method 306 QC limits: <10% for RPD and ±25% for Spike Recoveries) 

## Probe/Innp.1 Imp. 2 & 3 Imp. 2 & 3 Probe/Imp.1 RPD-2 RPD-3 RPD-2 RPD-3 Element RPD RPD Recovery Recovery
Chromium 6.9% 3.0% 101% 102%

Second Source Calibration Check Recoveries (Method 306 QC limits: ±10% for Continuing Check Standard')


## Element 1 ppb 100 ppb* 200 ppb Total Chromium 94% 97% 95%

elementOne

# SAMPLE CUSTODY

elementOne

## (a9 

## /41P Element One, Inc., 

# CHAIN OF CUSTODY Phone 910-793-0128 5022-C Wrightsville Av. Air Emissions Samples FAX 910-792-6853 Wilmington, NC 28403 Email ellab©hotmail.com

Client 

## AIR MONITORING SPECIALISTS, INC. Pro'ect rnerco Plant r 

## PO A 

### --1 - 

# &WNW- Ira Date Custodian 

# c

• 

## 0 ar

# IMAIMINIMMIN Plant address

A'? 

# favor 1 

# Ar 'T17,41 ellecearerc,,,,



## Sample Box ID 

## Custody Seal # 

## Run Number Fraction ID Tare Op —106— 1

— a- 

### J- 

## 4c_ ii
, 

## &QM -t

. 

## 1*-

- 

## :rm 4 

## , ,-, I Alp



### — 306— I 22.14 2



### .

14 -i- ? 

## _is ? 

## 1--,, ea.,- ..-f It ' 

## 2- r ir• - 2- 4- Jr

- 

### . -

- - . ° 

## R&D- ?oh

- 2

- ..i,, t 

### 2-c e ,77... -44..- e 1-1 

## keP - 

# ,7,-3 ' 

# o. Sr.

- kftp - 106- ? 2 t- ,?iii>....., rie l ....,-,, .ti A t P ILI P-3 )4 -giant

. / 4."

. , 1 1- 114-44' ot 1



## Received b • 

## Si•nature Com•a



## - 

# amass:Ss dir. Da e , - - • 

## e Condition 

# Kra sikirmi,, I 01 W.

_ a omit_
ement one, Inc. Form 120 - Revision 0.

# ANALYTICAL DATA

• elementOne -•••••(.s..; ,,1;•.5,r)

# Client: AMS Date / Time Received: 10.28.05 1300 

# One AIR TESTING SAMPLE SUBMISSION FORM Lab ID 6146 Analysis Maximum Completion Date: 11.09.05 QA/QC/Report Maximum Completion Date: 11.10.05 Project ID/ Number: Marco Scrubber

HNO 3 

# Lot: r /OSOIYO Ref. Method: 306 Volume Marke Y‘ N Volume Loss Y pH > 

# 12 C5 N Sample Identification Sample Identification RRD-M306-R1 Probe & 

# 11 7 RRD-M306-R3 Probe & 

# 11 2 RRD-M306-R1 12 & 

# I3 RRD-M306-R3 Probe & 

# 11 Spike 3 RRD-M306-R2 Probe &II 9 RRD-M306-R3 12 & 

# 13 4 RRD-M306-R2 Probe &11Duplicate 10 RRD-M306-R3 12 & 

# 13 Duplicate 5 RRD-M306-R2 12 & 

# 13 11 RRD-M306-Blank 6 RRD-M306-R2 12 & 

# 13 Spike Analyses Requested: Samples 1-6 Total Chrome NOTE:


# Front Half Back Half HNO3 (A) KMnO4 (B) HCI (C) SAMPLE BV, ml FV, ml BV, ml Used FV, ml 

# BY, ml FV, ml BV, mi FV, ml BV, ml FV, ml 1 ,1,4psi, 

# t,2-3S" A y e 

# At') --...,,_ 2 3/4 4J-fa, 

### A

- 

### x i

- 

# 516 'a0 'alde --„,,,sL t

c 

# 718 -.1saa rob --„,,..:NL it 

# 10-S--, 9/10 s!),A/%1.- 1`) 

# /oc. --,,,

11C 

# / v /0 !

. , , • 

### Q 3 

## cf.-WO

. , ..- 1.-IP ,Az5 

### a 4 U IS-0

Y4VC: hi ita 

# Comments: ,,,,„7,,,,,,,..,.w„,. q,A,..„. ..k .

c„,A,,,,,,,.....5,-..4-; et.,04-.v.A.ciAlzs -,--E 4-0 2 , s4,..ta # , co....a c itsicae..„-z. A 

# )2,7trtiois-A t ie tp...7..-jg.7 bt,'

.-. .-W---,.:frw--..

. tA._. zaz

em 

### ent 

## , F 

## orm Inc.

. orm - R 

## evision



# 1 of 1 Sample Submission by r4.`



## 11/4/2005 12:43:41 PM

# Sample/Batch Report

User Name: christine.selak Computer Name: ICPMS1 Sample File: C:\elandata\Sample\MMTL.sam Report Date/Time: Friday, November 04, 2005 15:55:50

A IS Loc. Batch ID Sample ID Description Sample Type Init. Quant. Prep. Vol. Aliquot Vol. Diluted Vol. Solids Ratio 14 6146-1 AMS 15 6146-2 AMS 16 6146-3 AMS 17 D 6146-3 AMS QC Duplicate 18 6146-5 AMS 19 S 6146-5 AMS Spike- 1 20 6146-7 AMS Sample 21 S 6146-7 AMS Spike - 1 22 6146-9 AMS 23 D 6146-9 AMS QC Duplicate 24 6146-11 AMS 25 LRB 26 S LRB Spike - 1



## Page 1

# Dataset Report

User Name: christine.selak Computer Name: ICPMS1 Dataset File Path: C:\elandata\Dataset\110405-5\ Report Date/Time: Friday, November 04, 2005 15:55:46 Autosampler Position: 

## 3 

## The Dataset

Time Sample ID Batch ID Read Type Description Init. Quant Prep. Vol. Aliquot. Vol. Diluted NJ 14:39:46 Fri 04-Nov-05 Blank Blank 14:41:15 Fri 04-Nov-05 Standard 1 Standard #1 14:42:45 Fri 04-Nov-05 Standard 2 Standard #2 14:44:17 Fri 04-Nov-05 Standard 3 Standard #3 14:45:48 Fri 04-Nov-05 QC Std 1 QC Std #1 14:47:18 Fri 04-Nov-05 QC Std 2 QC Std #2 14:48:49 Fri 04-Nov-05 QC Std 3 QC Std #3 14:50:19 Fri 04-Nov-05 QC Std 4 QC Std #4 14:51:50 Fri 04-Nov-05 QC Std 6 QC Std #6 14:53:21 Fri 04-Nov-05 QC Std 7 QC Std #7 14:54:52 Fri 04-Nov-05 QC Std 8 QC Std #8 14:56:24 Fri 04-Nov-05 QC Std .9 QC Std #9 14:57:56 Fri 04-Nov-G5 QC Std 10 QC Std #10 14:59:27 Fri 04-Nov-05 6146-1 Sample AMS 15:00:56 Fri 04-Nov-05 6146-2 Sample AMS 15:02:25 Fri 04-Nov-05 6146-3 Sample AMS 15:03:55 Fri 04

- Nov

- 05 6146-3 D QC Duplicate AMS 15:05:24 Fri 04-Nov-05 6146-5 Sample. AMS 15:06:54 Fri 04-Nov-05 6146-5 S Spike - 1 AMS 15:08:24 Fri 04-Nov-05 6146-7 Sample AMS 15:09:54 Fri 04-Nov-05 6146-7 

## S Spike - 1 AMS 15:11:25 Fri 04-Nov-05 6146-9 Sample AMS 15:12:56 Fri 04-Nov-05 6146-9 D QC Duplicate AMS 15:14:26 Fri 04-Nov-05 QC Std 1 QC Std #1 15:15:56 Fri 04-Nov-05 QC Std 4 QC Std #4 15:17:28 Fri 04-Nov-05 6146-11 Sample AMS 15:18:58 Fri 04-Nov-05 QC Std 1 QC Std #1 15:20:28 Fri 04-Nov-05 QC Std 4 QC Std #4 15:50:07 Fri 04-Nov-05 LRB Sample 15:51:38 Fri 04-Nov-05 LRB S Spike - 1 15:53:07 Fri 04-Nov-05 QC Std 1 QC Std #1 15:54:37 Fri 04-Nov-05 QC Std 4 QC Std #4



## Page 1

# elementOne ICP-MS RUN SHEET 6146

Analyst: _CMS Date: 11-04-05 Solid Samples q / 

## Liquid Samples

A/S Loc Batch # f 

## or sample

sets 

## Sample Lab ID Sample Description Type Sample QC Spike QC Dup QC Reg Blank 

## Spike

. cmcentrati° 

## Prep Volume (ml) 

## Weight (g) Aliquot (ml) Dilute d to Volu

me (ml) 

## 12 LRB S 100
13 LRB SS Table #1 100
14 6146-1 S 100
15 6146-2 S 100
16 6146-3 S 100
17 6146-3 SD 100
i 18 6146-5 S 100 19 6146-5 SS Table #1 100 

## 20 6146-7 100 

## 21 6146-7 SS Table #1 100 

## 22 6146-9 S 100
23 6146-9 SD 100
24 6146-11 S 100 Dilutions and Rechecks
25 LRB S 100
26 LRB SS Table #1 100



## Spikes are at 0 2 mL of 25ppm spiking solution lot 021405-A in a final volume of 100m1. Submitted for QC: Date: \•D Time: 

## Wien QC Review: Date. 11.1-19 

## Time:
10 : 3D 

## 1-J. 32)
Re-Test Required: Yes: Cols:
Resubmitted for QC: Date: Time: By: QC Review: Date: Time: By:
Element One, Inc. Form 126 - Revision 0.0

## 100 100 100

.4) ELAN Instrument ontro ession - uantt a ore Ana ysis Mel o m - CAE: an ata'1/4 e otht r jamw.ni u Lillie

ER6



## it• 

## 4,165,i6 

# 14.4,'6 talA 

## eogo ir 

## o piii.. 

## .AS 4[ Talitij2 UN' ilfaTatilre-3 rig.) Spik6 Talc 3 Datiniig S p I ke suite dai 

## 1 Li 2 Sc 3 Cr 4 Cr 5 Hu 6 

## Kr 6.0151 '44.9559 50 51.9405 50 ,52.9407 '50,t1164.93 1823141 '50

fr
ittrObsakagaJdAqtilt kcapratistfaagriipio:.ititmiliA i.::*seugraatispike Tables AOC:APtIticqntr01sAAutogarlipiej.

- - :" !CAP) :LOCI-7 '7

a Statik 0 [fit 0:::t 0 Gp :::;Ii‘i ELAN I nstrumenttort.. ELI4NEditiReplocess.SO41,701jdoso(t Wald - I CRIS !RD 12,4(,-(3)4?%(i4 am Pm:

.Method 6020 & 200.8 Metals Summary Report Sample ID: Blank Sample Da Friday, November 04, 2005 14:39:46 Sample Description: Concentration Results Analyte Mass Meas. Inter Conc. Meat Report Unit Li 6 23972 7 ppb 48373.1 Sc 45 ppb 

### I Cr 52 3293.9 ppb 

### I Cr 53 7263.4 ppb I> Rh 103 109864 2 ppb 227196.7 Ho 165 ppb Kr 83 105 PPb Method 6020 & 200.8 Metals Summary Report Sample ID: Standard 1 Sample Da Friday, November 04, 200514:41:15 Sample Description: Concentration Results Analyte Mass Meas. Inter Conc. Meat Report Unit Li 6 24637.8 ppb Sc 45 44626.7 ppb Cr 52 4797.9 0.93051 ppb Cr 53 8132.1 4.01452 ppb 

### I> Rh 103 110664 ppb Ho 165 237561.1 ppb Kr 83 92.7 ppb Method 6020 & 200.8 Metals Summary Report Sample ID: Standard 2 Sample Da Friday, November 04, 2005 14:42:45 Sample Description: Concentration Results Analyte Mass Meas. Inter Conc. Meat Report Unit Li 6 25492.8 ppb 

### I- Sc 45 42574.9 ppb Cr 52 157599.1 96.50562 ppb Cr 53 27632.2 100.377 ppb 

### I> Rh 103 111028.6 ppb Ho 165 244210.4 ppb Kr 83 100.3 ppb Method 6020 & 200.8 Metals Summary Report Sample ID: Standard 3 Sample Da Friday, November 04, 200514:44:17 Sample Description: Concentration Results Analyte Mass Meas. Inter Conc. Meat Report Unit Li 6 25313.3 ppb Sc 45 44519.9 ppb I Cr 52 785798 500.699 ppb 

# I Cr 53 106003.3 499.9186 ppb 

### I > Rh 103 108577 1 ppb 247833.3 Ho 165 ppb Kr 83 107.3 ppb Method 6020 & 200.8 Metals Summary Report Sample ID: QC Std 1 Sample Da Friday, November 04, 2005 14:45:48 Sample Description: Concentration Results Analyte Mass Meas. Inter Conc. Meat Report Unit Li 6 26205 ppb Sc 45 34637.4 ppb Cr 52 3562.7 0.09198 ppb Cr 53 9563.3 9.76451 ppb Rh 103 114009.9 ppb Ho 165 253599.6 ppb Kr 83 101.7 ppb


### elementOne 8 6146 1 of 7Method 6020 & 200.8 Metals Summary Report Sample ID: QC Std 2 Sample Da Friday, November 04, 2005 14:47:18 Sample Description: Concentration Results Analyte Mass Meas. Inter Conc. Meai Report Unit Li 6 27181.3 ppb Sc 45 36226.7 ppb Cr 52 4951.3 0.94097 ppb 

### I Cr 53 10273.1 13.26449 ppb
I > Rh 103 113748.7 ppb Ho 165 258311 4 ppb 88 Kr 83 ppb Method 6020 & 200.8 Metals Summary Report Sample ID: QC Std 3 Sample Da Friday, November 04, 2005 14:48:49 Sample Description: Concentration Results Analyte Mass Meas. Inter Conc. Meal Report Unit Li 6 27563.7 ppb Sc 45 44643.8 ppb Cr 52 306806.1 47856.2 189.4978 ppb 

### I> Cr Rh 53 103 200.0987 ppb PPb 111147.1 Ho 165 260837.4 ppb Kr 83 95 ppb Method 6020 & 200.8 Metals Summary Report Sample ID: QC Std 4 Sample Da Friday, November 04, 2005 14:50:19 Sample Description: Concentration Results Analyte Mass Meas. Inter Conc. Meat Report Unit Li 6 28230.1 ppb Sc 45 34157.5 ppb Cr 52 163039 96.55078 ppb Cr 53 30997.5 112.0087 ppb Rh 103 114892.6 ppb Ho 165 266463.6 ppb Kr 83 98 ppb Method 6020 & 200.8 Metals Summary Report Sample ID: QC Std 6 Sample Da Friday, November 04, 2005 14:51:50 Sample Description: Concentration Results Analyte Mass Meas. Inter Conc. Mew Report Unit Li 6 31508.3 ppb 

### I- Sc 45 44758.8 ppb 

### I Cr 52 6934.8 1.81957 ppb Cr 53 13288 22.83773 ppb
I > Rh 103 123465.1 PPb Ho 165 304233.1 ppb Kr 83 125 ppb Method 6020 & 200.8 Metals Summary Report Sample ID: QC Std 7 Sample Da Friday, November 04, 2005 14:53:21 Sample Description: Concentration Results Analyte Mass Meas. Inter Conc. Meal Report Unit Li 6 31326.3 ppb Sc 45 44431.5 PPb Cr 52 24409.5 11.41696 ppb 1 Cr 53 16508.8 35.94813 ppb
I > Rh 103 125454.4 ppb Ho 165 308958.8 ppb Kr 83 125.7 ppb


### elementOne e 6146 2 onMethod 6020 & 200.8 Metals Summary Report Sample ID: QC Std 8 Sample Da Friday, November 04, 2005 14:54:52 Sample Description: Concentration Results Analyte Mass Meas. Inter Conc. Meat Report. Unit Li 6 34573.7 ppb Sc 45 44128.8 ppb Cr 52 4502.4 0.09202 ppb I Cr 53 10717.8 4.65919 ppb I> Rh 103 144001.1 ppb. Ho 165 329263.3 ppb Kr 83 90/ PPb

165 275110.8 Kr 83 79.7 Method 6020 & 200.8 Metals Summary Report Sample ID: 6146-1 Sample. Da Friday, November 04, 2005 14:59:27 Sample De AMS Concentration Results Analyte Mass Meas. Inter Conc. Meat Report Unit Li 6 22379.5 ppb Sc 45 32478.3 ppb Cr 52 11734.3 8.46891 ppb Cr 53 7090.9 14.22488 ppb Rh 103 77291.9 ppb Ho 165 178147.5 ppb Kr 83 79.7 ppb Method 6020 & 200.8 Metals Summary Report Sample ID: 6146-2 Sample Da Friday, November 04, 2005 15:00:56 Sample De AMS Concentration Results Method 6020 & 200.8 Metals Summary Report Sample ID: QC SW 9 Sample Da Friday, November 04, 2005 14:56:24 Sample Description: Concentration Results Analyte Mass Li Sc Cr Cr Rh Ho Kr Method 6020 & 200.8 Metals Summary Report Sample ID: QC Std 10 Sample Da Friday, November 04, 2005 14:57:56 Sample Description: Concentration Results Analyte Mass Meas. Inter Conc. Meat Report Unit Li 6 29625.3 ppb Sc Cr Cr Rh Ho Meas. Inter Conc. Meat Report Unit 6 29106.9 ppb 45 40189.8 ppb 52 3794.4 0.16222 ppb 53 9049.9 6.018 ppb 103 117682.8 ppb. 165 275354.7 ppb 83 88.3 PPb

45 36101.9 ppb 52 3818.1 0.14497 ppb 53 8549.7 3.19113 ppb 103 119156.1 ppb ppb PPb

Analyte Mass Meas. inter Conc. Meat Report Unit Li 6 21520.4 ppb Sc 45 29213.9 ppb Cr 52 36349.8 32.41788 ppb 

### I Cr 53 8651.5 28.71008 ppb I> Rh 103 73184 ppb Ho 165 163494.7 ppb Kr 83 70/ ppb


### elementOne e 6146 3 of 7Method 6020 & 200.8 Metals Summary Report Sample ID: 6146-3 Sample Da Friday, November 04, 2005 15:02:25 Sample De. AMS Concentration Results Analyte Mass Meas. inter Conc. Meal Report Unit Li 6 20277.4 ppb F Sc 45 24928.7 ppb Cr 52 9827 3 7.76196 ppb 4887.6 1 Cr 53 2.51019 ppb Rh 103 69397.4 ppb Ho 165 155655.6 ppb Kr 83 853 ppb Method 6020 & 200.8 Metals Summary Report Sample ID: 6146-3 Sample Da Friday, November 04, 2005 15:03:55 Sample De AMS Concentration Results Analyte Mass. Meas. Inter Conc. Meai Report Unit Li 6 22828.9 ppb Sc 45 26484.4 ppb Cr 52 10472.6 7.24784 ppb 

### I> Cr Rh 53 103 4522.7 779911 -4.44503 ppb ppb Ho 165 172898.6 ppb Kr 83 82 ppb Method 6020 & 200.8 Metals Summary Report Sample ID: 6146-5 Sample Da Friday, November 04, 200515:05:24 Sample De. AMS Concentration Results Analyte Mass Meas. Inter Conc. Meai Report Unit 

### 1- Sc 6 45 18242.6 24540.3 ppb ppb Cr 52 27354 28.98315 ppb Cr 53 6290 20.16739 ppb Rh 103 61164.5 ppb Ho 165 136874 8 ppb 70/ Kr 83 ppb Method 6020 & 200.8 Metals Summary Report Sample ID: 6146-5 Sample Da Friday, November 04, 2005 15:06:54 Sample De. AMS Concentration Results Analyte Mass Li Sc Cr I Cr I> Rh

Kr 83 70 Meas. Inter Conc. Meal Report

. Unit 6 20643.1 ppb 45 26145.1 ppb 52 81944.2 79.22427 ppb 53 12731.6 6360044 ppb 103 69990.7 ppb 165 154658.8 ppb ppb Method 6020 & 200.8 Metals Summary Report Sample ID: 6146-7 Sample Da Friday, November 04, 2005 15:0824 Sample De AMS Concentration Results Analyte Mass Meas. Inter Conc. Meat Li 6 19843.2 Sc 45 26509.1 Cr 52 9901.7 8.31879 Cr 53 3563.3 -6.72137 Rh 103 66126.7 Ho 165 146102.6
Kr 83 91.7 Report Unit ppb ppb ppb ppb Ppb ppb ppb



### elementOne e 6146 4 of 7Report Unit PPb ppb ppb ppb ppb ppb ppb Method 6020 & 200.8 Metals Summary Report Sample ID: 6146-7 Sample Da Friday, November 04, 2005 15:09:54 Sample De. AMS Concentration Results Analyte Mass Meas. Inter Conc. Meal Report Unit Li 6 20130.4 ppb Sc 45 24048.6 ppb Cr 52 59742.8 59.46061 ppb Cr 53 9726.5 42.95248 ppb I> Rh 103 67405.5 ppb Ho 165 149189.4 ppb Kr 83 69.3 ppb Method 6020 & 200.8 Metals Summary Report Sample ID: 6146-9 Sample Da Friday, November 04, 2005 15:11:25 Sample De AMS Concentration Results Analyte Mass Meas. Inter Conc. Meai Report Unit Li 6 20533.6 ppb 

### I- Sc 45 23764.1 ppb Cr 52 19367.9 17.47643 ppb Cr 53 4625.5 0.6114 ppb I> Rh 103 68793 ppb Ho 165 152371.4 ppb 77.7 Kr 83 ppb Method 6020 & 200.8 Metals Summary Report Sample ID: 6146-9 Sample Da Friday, November 04, 200515:12:56 Sample De MIS Concentration Results Analyte Mass Meas. Inter Conc. Meal Report Unit Li 6 20571.5 ppb 

# I- Sc 45 24327.9 ppb Cr 52 20032.3 18.01473 ppb Cr 53 4469 -0.81704 PPb Rh 103 69309 5 PPb 153626 Ho 165 ppb Kr 83 75.3 ppb Method 6020 & 200.8 Metals Summary Report Sample ID: QC Std 1 Sample Da Friday, November 04, 2005 15:14:26 Sample Description: Concentration Results Analyte Mass Meas. Inter Conc. Meal Li 6 28238.4 Sc 45 25515.9 I Cr 52 2992.1 -0.07892 Cr 53 3819.8 -16.07111 I > Rh 103 103798.8 Ho 165 222167 Kr 83 112.3 Method 6020 & 200.8 Metals Summary Report Sample ID: QC Std 4 Sample Da Friday, November 04, 2005 15:15:56 Sample Description: Concentration Results Analyte Mass Meas. Inter Conc. Meal Report Unit Li 6 29037.2 PPb Sc 45 32928.1 ppb Cr 52 158501.8 96.15253 ppb Cr 53 23798.7 80.2939 ppb 

### I> Rh 103 112004 PPb Ho 165 257740.8 ppb Kr 83 121.7 ppb


### elementOne e 6146 5 of 7Method 6020 & 200.8 Metals Summary Report Sample ID: 6146-11 Sample Da Friday, November 04, 2005 15:17:28 Sample De AMS Concentration Results Analyte Mass Meas. Inter Conc. Meal Report Unit Li 6 19200.3 ppb I- Sc 45 25320.8 ppb I Cr 52 5692 3.8064 ppb I Cr 53 3502.3 -7.43617 ppb I> Rh 103 67262 1 ppb 144478.7 Ho 165 ppb Kr 83 120.7 ppb Method 6020 & 200.8 Metals Summary Report Sample ID: QC Std 1 Sample Da Friday, November 04, 2005 15:18:58 Sample Description: Concentration Results Analyte Mass Meas. Inter Conc. Meal Report Unit Li 6 29304.9 ppb 

### I- Sc 45 25858.4 ppb I Cr 52 2704.1 -0.23432 ppb -17.3586 ppb I Cr 53 3510 I> Rh 103 101746 ppb Ho 165 214777.2 ppb Kr 83 111 ppb Method 6020 & 200.8 Metals Summary Report Sample ID: QC Std 4 Sample Da Friday, November 04, 2005 15:20:28 Sample Description: Concentration Results Analyte Mass Meas. Inter Conc. Meal Report Unit Li 6 31001 ppb 

### F Sc 45 34131 ppb I Cr 52 160059.5 93.85979 ppb 

### I Cr 53 23868.8 76.77422 ppb I> Rh 103 115861.9 ppb Ho 165 257140.3 ppb Kr 83 133.7 ppb Method 6020 & 200.8 Metals Summary Report Sample ID: LRB Sample Da Friday, November 04, 2005 15:50:07 Sample Description: Concentration Results Analyte Mass Meas. Inter Conc. Meal Report Unit Li 6 25606.1 ppb 

### I- Sc 45 72323.7 ppb I Cr 52 3663.4 0.30315 ppb I Cr 53 8014 4.95059 ppb I> Rh 103 106991.6 ppb Ho 165 242861.4 ppb Kr 83 89.3 ppb Method 6020 & 200.8 Metals Summary Report Sample ID: LRB Sample Da Friday, November 04, 2005 15:51:38 Sample Description: Concentration Results Analyte Mass Meas. Inter Conc. Meal Report Unit Li 6 26487.9 ppb I- Sc 45 53486.6 ppb I Cr 52 79389 48.48675 ppb I Cr 53 15628.7 42.41477 ppb I > Rh 103 109033.1 ppb Ho 165 248437 ppb Kr 83 95.3 ppb


### elementOne e 6146 6of7Modod 6020 & 200.8 Metals Summary Report Salale ID: QC. Std 1 Sant•le Da Friday, November 04, 2005 15:53:07 Sample Description: Conantration Results Analyte Mass Meas. Inter Conc. Meat Report Unit Li 6 27627.7 ppb I- Sc 45 40804.3 ppb I Cr 52 3548.3 0 05914 ppb 1.46029 ppb I Cr 53 7918.6 I> Rh 103 .115263 ppb Ho 165 264751.8 ppb Kr 83 97.7 ppb Mettod 6020 & 200.8 Metals Summary Report Sanile ID: QC Std 4 Sa nile Da Friday, November 04, 2005 15:54:37 Sa gle Description: Concentration Results Analyte Mass Meas. Inter Conc. Meal Report Unit Li 6 27630 ppb I- Sc 45 43356.2 ppb I Cr 52 163301 96.25426 ppb I Cr 53 28297 4 98.45886 ppb 115324.4 ppb I > Rh 103 Ho 165 271295 ppb Kr 83 97.7 ppb



### elementOne e 6146 7of 7

# Appendix B

Field DataTEMPERATURE SENSOR STACK WALL 

### PROBE
PITOT TUBE s*" 

# sly s ifitfriardbe

• II REVERSE • TYPE

PITOT TUBE Ve.,,,...STACK WALL THERMOMETER (7) CHECK VALVE

ORIFICE 

# 7

MANOMETER MAIN VALVE

AIN.UMiTIWO PROSE

MI a OD a MN! St a Ile So • !a g m ..... am . mi.

VACUUM LINE

VACUUM GAUGE PITOT MANOMETER 10 • v I I: • 0 ,:: it

THERMOMETERS ORIFICE 

# 0

—IMES 

# is 1 .: 1 • • 1::• 0:. 

## .0 1 „: 0
: 

### it; 

## 'at

ICE BATH IMPINGES'S ST • PASS VALVE 

### Impinger Contents: 1st & 2nd -.100 mis .1N NaOH 3rd Empty • 4th - 150 g silica gel

wilf TEST METER



### SCHEMATIC OF EPA METHOD 3Q6 CHROMIUM SAMPLING TRAIN ALL 

### COMPONENTS GLASS OR TEFLON BEFORE THE EXIT THERMOMETER&RAW mOR12011TAL t1UE T IIROUDIt DIAMETERS

II meta. Men • •nd .2 •I•nt 00000 0 L ag U dtics

dui. is lest lints 2C • us. • a• o' p•n".

DISTANCE FROM OUT SIDE OF PORT

24 re C ii .!--., Air 

## lifonitoming. Specialist:J.1w- . alacrity rotate Teal 

# Sampling and Velocity Traverse Point Determination EPA Method 1'

CLIENT PLANT NAME CITY, STATE a SAMPLING LOCATION MI /P0 7 Servege--...91-12)
NO. OF PORTS. AVAILABLE 2- NO. OF PORTS USED PORT INSIDE DIAMETER 

## 31'

DISTANCE FROM FAR WALL TO OUTSIDE OF PORT NIPPLE LENGTH ANO/OR WALL THICKNESS DEPTH OF STACK OR DUCT STACK OR DUCT WIDTH (IF REcT4103924111 EOUI y ALENT DIAMETER; DF

- PTH r WIDTH

- D .- DEPTH . WIDTH DISTANCE • FROM PORTS TO FLOW DISTURBANCES DIAMETERS STACK/DUCT AREA

.

• Locidica 447nm:cm Paids inCircalar St

. arks cE Dols votes of stock &mutt fions iilidevialitairleritta0p0O4 2 I J.I ). / UPSTREAM DOWNSTREAM

3

. 6 

## Ir.

INS 12 VELOCITY PARTICutATE.
DIAMETERS UP OOMPH

e 2 0 12;

1.s

12s FA at/P:

- 

# 1 24 or 25

PIVOT USED (I) TYPE STANDARD
X OF DISTANCE DUCT' FROM POINT Denis WAIL •

peat 2 4 6 It 10 14 .16 It 14.6 6.7 4.4 3.2 2.6 Y1 3.1.1,6 24 2 254 no 146 6.2 Si 43 4.4 75.0 29.6 192 14.6 93 14 73 93.3, 704 323 216 17.7 4.6 123 109 5- 13.4 67.7 34.2 1 169 14.6 95.6 104 652 ..9.220 in 7 193 77.4 64.4 6 223 236 96.2 53.4 4 373 29.6 1 66.5 322 10 924 A2 9 711 619 13.4 720 704 901 Al 76.4 943 113 171 96.2 913 15.4 , 15_ 95.1 13.1 91.4 925 17- 916 Is_._ 96.6 20- 20_ • 20 

### n 24 13 11 1/ 39 13 3.2 6.7 6.0 33 9.7 27 73 129 17.6 10.3 163 14.6 132 20.4 110'.161 210 211 DA 30.6 262 210 36.1 313 27.2 61.2 393 313 WA 60.7 392 710 613 601 79.6 733 67.7 MS 722 72.1 17.1 no 77.0 903 1,4 WA 933

. IAA 139 96.1 91.3 KS 927 94.0 09.3 963 91.1 929 943 963 593 9 

# 82 to

12 13 

### 14 15 16 

# 20-7/ 

# 2/ 719 

# 223 fy 

## 11 57g (7 V2."



# 17. • Location of Traverse Points in Rectangular Stab or Doris ipdt 2 3 4 • 6 7 '9: 10 11

. 12 18

• 1 - 230 7-- 710

3 • 6- 163 50.0 213 129 37.3 T73 10.0 3110 75.0 500 417 100 511.3 930. 73.0 91.7 7.1 63 5.6 10 4.5 4.2 21.4 119 /67 15.0 13.6 123 317. 31.3. 27.1 750 227 203 50.0 43.3 .- 329 33.0 312 292 64.3 56.3 500 430 449 373 • 726 6113 611 550 3053 452 WA 123 na 63a Na ma 934 25.3 739 622 'CU 94.4 WA na 910 WA 792 953 113 

### 21

23

91197209 Co .c> N 2 . 7 CO2 Comicnacrs
V t. : Silica gel Total IS 0 

## onitoring. peciglists, Inc.! Quality 

### Source Testing 

## FIELD DATA Plant Rik. On N.% Data \Ss I 

# iii, Sampling Location 

## aiLCe b 5r eo&N"te
Run Number ikiki`) M--boar Sample Type 

### Operator Barometric Pressure ) Static Pressure (P I 

### ) ; "kip 

### Filter Num ber(s) r3/ A 

### Pretest Leak Rate al .000 

### cfm fig Pretest Pilot Leak Check tt 

### Pretest Orsat Leak Check ra k Schematic 

### of Read and Record 

### all Data Every ej Minutes 

### Traverse Point Layout i/S 

### • 44/2-
01111• Pala! Number



### D



## o 

# t

0

co'

• 

# asta 

# s tral a raMtall m eranuovlsrammtinnants 

# Mal MIMS IMEMINPICitatTRIN . SEMI

Tata 

### 10 ; D1 49.9 Al 4 

# IrE g nICCINFVONW M PFIM 

# SIMPIIIIIMI LST1111110M ISM ataiiirintala 

# IMIEN FaIIINNOMI gilIMMalEitt11101101flIEWIIMINIIIRIVI NOIMMIIIMMItnit 

# NMI Via NOMIIIIMMISalINIMPIpallIMIN 

# lair Calla 

# =mini twesumnitstrasan 100 1 5 MIMI= al 

# 111.11=1111 Oaly, 

# ROOM IPPS1111101MIlla EtiMal PICIM111111011111PIRTS llrill111111121111111 11/444 Ps) la II 1 tCa. • C1C10111 (Oki) fa. H 

### 0 elm 

### @ _4_ In. fig

hit A

GU Wier Tem 

### • 

# • i 

### a Probe Length and Type 

# 1 ' GA N SS Pilot Tuba La No. .—.±1.--13e NOzzlo 

### 1 D • %' s1
Ass umed Moisture, %


## .. . 

## SY,'
Meter Box Number Attic:7-S 

### ?detain II@ 1. CI 

### Meter Gamma •IS'Sk Referenced p K u l aTA Poet Teti Leak Rate n , re‘r+o-, Post Test Pilot Leak Check Poet Test Orsat Leek Check ,



# norcencartnanma NEES
Man


# I I 1111n MICIII

MIMI! eta ran

### onitoring Ipecl , alists Quality Source resting FIELD DATA Conde outs 02

f

CO;.

V L : Silica gel CO 

### Plant ' 

### ikiktps.INA\%.1 Total I& 0 N i 

### Date ‘011.611,6 Sampling Location Mot 

### S CP‘z+ kaktser Probe Length oners/pc 0,-1 sass 

### Sample Type M - 3n Cv Pilot Tube 1.D. No. Run Number P.RtNIm- e )111.01 ". 

### Nozzle 1.D. • 

### 4,e5 Operator C 

### ' 3C- Assumed Moisture, % 

### Barometric Pressure (8 ) Meter 

### Box Number Static Pressure (11 ) — 1.."b Metet4 

### Ha 1' .R s9 Filter Num 

### ber(s) tat 04 Meter Gamma n ?fl. 

### Pretest Leak Rate is .00 o cfm 6 i C 

### In. Ng Retemneca p -; 4,0 

### Pretest not Leak Cheek 

# 3 Poet Test Leak Ram s • elm CP In. lig 

### Pretest °rut 

### Leak Clock Ni Posi Test Pilot Leak Check 

### Schematic of Read and Record all Data Every cs Minutes ta 

# ts Traverse Point 

### Layout Post Test Oral Leak Check



# Ii 11C14 Nita Number ump Vacuum To, II 

# tarmalial IFNETWMI11117111 

# MIMS allIkr1111 8. A n 

# 11111111111111 MIME 

# mocrimmurremaiss 11flIllfl111MINIIIIFIIIIIIM511111111a11111 

# MICSIIIINIIIM11111111M IIMI1111 

# lea 

# Wa ri l 

# l3M1111 IFM11111flatIlli SWIM 

# mum PME1111111211111PMINIM21 11 

# a 

# MINIM

IMIllnt0111111CTI . II • 

# MUNI WEIS EILTIMICCCIIIICtallill111111111 Ir1111111101101153111111Mal
MIPIIIIIIMIT11111001111r11 . 1117.1111M11.111111111111111 IMPC711111111111MININIECIIMICILTIM111.1 Ma1111111111PCMCIMIllrall 11111111S

. 

# .......n1=1111111111

• Temp./ Filler Temp.. F Cm Gm Meier Tem



### • •



# 11111r11110M11111119011111111fl 

# SSW 111111111111/11111111E111111 0 

# Mir

&Orb. rbM

### 11,0 % 1 • 1
c41 nitorIng

e 

# ct
• peciclists Inc. 1 A DP Quality Source Testing

Plant 

# Mk 0
Date 10 Sampling Locution 

## mascp cle-kALef Sample PIN 

# Cc \ 

# - - 5 nu, Run Number taCkn J to b to I Operator 

### c,. c: Barometric Pressure ($ ) Stade Pressure (P, )' •):1 ' Filler Number(a) 1g14,

Pretest Leak Rate ol .000 dm 

### , 1D

_ ,In. fig Pretest Pltot Leak Check 3 Pretest Oast Leak Check rgl A Read and Record all Data Every Minutes

Jot 

# gild

nn. sampans 

## (2 ,, , 

## ,k /ba c 

## . USt MOW VIICCly VI Wi4 me. UllIC7C01111 014Ca ri Li la maywin Polat no*, • (24•bout Buono; !lead.( P•) (eil)ia.H 0 Imp. • F romp./ Flan• Tampa
Number cola. clock) Us it 

## 3 la. it t Ca Mon Temp.• F • F Lily liej mom to • --r c VIM CI la

t / 

## IIMIPMIIIIIMIIIIMP111PMIXIIMIN / : 111112W4111
o 11011111IMTIMICIMIIICOIN . I 

# ma SIN al IPMfl11111111M11111.0111 fling, 

# vitnucvnmannstama as al IWIIIIII 111111a11111C111 flail IIMME11111111M1111111LflIMMINICCIIIIIIMINIMIIIIIIININI PiCIMIIIIIIMIIII e. Illrl . Nal ag 

## e ! 1•11111.1 

# INNMati. • IIIIMIIIMIllallrlinIMM11111011 . II ya..2 I t MIMS MIMI • ..• • / 11111 11111111MIIIIMIMIMICP111 lialleePSIIIIIMII / MIMI 0110M11110100111201111M1111 1111nINISSII 11111111111 MS .b MEW al la a 

# sr.k

MM. WIMIIIIMPSEHICTIIIIIIa MIS PWIMIIIIINCIIIIIIIinlIMMIIP11111110Thl Mi MIWAII.1111170111110011111ritantIMI Pt= 

# simmenuan a wargeriprin tessioniustrami amwr ia 

# = ==n i 

# nj an 

# i

firon11111M11111111110111111r1 . 111=1111111ftlaall

. 11110 1 MrleariM Il a llril SEMI 1 IIIIIIIIIIIIIIMIIIIIIIIIIIIPCVnllIllrIIIIIIrllaIIIIICCIIII 11111111r111112=111111111M1111111r4 IrIllr11111 IIIII Minlail Mllar g IMMIIIIIIIIIIMIIIIIIIIMIIIIPIM1113111111 . • 0 Ill Ma l tilt . 71010 1 111111111101111111MCIIIIIILIMI 

# la fl ' 1111arlitillIallIMMIIIIMMICLIIII 211111111121111111111=S1111 =11

. Illn ii 17 0 2

CO 

### 02 FIELD DATA Ctaitiaikauts V u ; Silica gel Total lI r 0



### Schematic of Traverse Point Layout Probe Length and Typo C-r1.ss,Ca) Rites Tube: D No 3-01% l g ozzle 1 D. Asauraed Moisture Ve Meter Box Number



### — 

## SAtic, Meter4 H@ ) ,An Meter Cazeraa %, 'Ilk References, p \C.% 

# 1.3

t .0 Port TC41Lcak Rite • 

# ' o p(' tiro@ Post Test Pilot Leak Check Post Test 0 rsat Leak Cheek ro I A in Jig

'Limn

## MOISTURE ANALYTICAL RESULTS 

# p lant Name 

# Ri 1



# . 21 ThatIgne 

# e City/State 

## ..isigirde( 

# /4

Rua Number Saapling Date Analysis 

### Date Analyst sampling Loc. 

# fimpo rcragenn_ ROL-704 t-rvis 1 /o-25-- 

# or -7,111-c2C 10-,2S-- or Job No. /0, ___gf .L___

Srer



### Bement A (..-C/14(7W ) 

# sie 

# - r 

# 4'4. 2 se-7 

# , ..".._-) —..‘

. 4, 

## / i 4

_ 

### Zinal Weight, 9
Taxed 

### Weight, g

Water Catch, g 

# 6 s6 4 '/ b.



# 3 42C4 ‘..2.5: 

# o
- 

# a j • 

# 2, 2.--

Reagent. 2 ( 

# 4 ,5 

# e /144011) 

# 495-7t. --709t Final Weight, g 7ared Weight, g

Water Catch, g ‘7.5-,-6 ‘ 

# ._z 4-7571

2142/ 

# !"

" 

# 27,0

577 77, c?' S-72 

# 6 / 

# 0 Tteaclen 

# t 3 ( 3 rr— ) 

### Tina' Weight, g Tared Weight, g 

### Water Catch, g

,.......... 

# 5-01.‘"7 S-DeP, 4? 

# 4. I 3 , eg

COMERSED WATER, g 

# 2 6 , I_ 7 7.0

Silica Cel 

# 7 2

- L t. i ‘R 

# s Final Weight, g Tared Weight, g 

# 0 -7 

# .2, 3 a,-7S S t— Z.6.57-2,

ADSORBED WATER, g 11)R2 Tt 

## II 41X , ( it ‘

TOTAL WATER COLLECTED, g

Balance No. & J Typo ()) Triple Beam Electronic Reagent Box No.

Balance located instable, draft 

# • free area CJ)7 Yes CU "Ho", explain below.) Corcenenta 

# at, et-I5 2/1 

# Rop 

# 3 

# pEr r - / 2— 

# r&t... A 2. Pell-itiw-letC.MOISTURE ANALYTICAL RESULTS



### Pla nt Name 

# 6ie 

# f e, 

# Topwr o 

# ,1 ler Job No.j_224-01-- Cit3/Statei c anAckc_ea sampling Loc. 

## /n4Peo 

## s7„4,,,e1 

# PO-Toe -To- 3

- — 2-r-os

frib 

# r

Rea g ent A 

# LC

- /0 ) (21 

# 4 ) 

# ficA 

# r Final Weight, g

Tared 

### Weight, g

Water Catch, g 

# 5



# - -4S, 9--

• ---' 

# 0 (1

Rea g ent 2 (X
- 4 4V4(/) 

# ‘ha 

# i
Final Weight, g Tared Weight, g Water Catch, g 

# 6v7, 0

1.4 il

Reagent 3 ( 4,Er_



# < 

# 0 11,3 Final Weight, g Tared Weight, g Water Catch, g 

# ro 7 2-

17 2 i

CONDENSED WATER, 

### g 

# 21, (

Silica Gel

g


### g gq , ( 

# .__6 Final Weight,

Tared 

### Weight, 

# b e7 , 

# r

ADSORBED WATER, g lA•e;

Balance No.k i ti(^ j_1 

### Type (/) Triple Beam - Electronic Reagent Box No.

Balance located in stable, draft-free area MT Yes No (If "No", explain below.)


### Comments

Avn Number
Su p pling Date Aialysie Date Aealyet

# Appendix C

Calibration Data. . AMS Ina METER PRE-TEST CALIBRATION

• Date: 17•Aug-05 Meter Box Identillcatlor Calibration Meter I. 1078914 Yds.: 1.0037 Barometric 30.03 AMS • 5 Calibrators Initials; EWE Approved

. Bt
. MDS

33

:1:111 1711117111iir:1

„ 11",•: to n lir ifli u 1

a:: CrililliMplThiirr i liptgit i DIIIIBStROkii : ti: ''' 01' griffilM11:::r1

" , : ::: S p :IP

- 1

gig P.W.11771171 :illiffil

•
I. A ... Ithifiii Fil lig ii ii$11

. ::
. . ffilill " i - ' " '

'111 'in Stop 0.5 229,879 842.215 .82 00 13 1.74464 1.04353 0,13452 Start 0,5 224.445 837.122 82 88 Avera g e: as 5.234 5.093 82 89

Sto p 1.0 234,999 847.448 82 92 9.5 1.80145 1.03480 0.13230 Start 1.0 229.679 842,215 82 90 Avera g e: 1.0 5.320 5,233 82.0 91

Sto p 1,5 240,099 852.49 82 7.6 1,83045 1.03206 0.13117 1.5 294,999 847.448 82 92 Avera g e: 1.6 5.100 5,042 82 93

_

Ste p 2.0 245,183 857.631 82 98 6.5 1.84255 1.03149 0.13066 Start 2.0 240,099 852,49 82 94 Avera g e: 2.0 5.064 5,041 82 99

Stop. 9.0 250.492 862.829 82 96 53 132024 1.02424. 0.13167 Start 3,0 245.183 857.531 82 .96 Average 30 5309 sass 82 96

Sto p 4,0 256.012 866.341 82 97 5 126272 1,02204 0.13041 Start 40 250.492 862829 82 98 Average; 4.0 5.520 5.512 82 963

Average: 1.81701 1.03135 0.13179
Kisc o: 1577.560

Orlin* Setting 0.6 1.0 1.5 2.0 3.0 , 4.0 Y Div. 0.01217 0.00344 0.00070 3.00013 0.00712 0.00932 Delta H 0.07237 0.01556 0.01344 0.02555 0.00323 0.04671 Acceptable Y Dev. 0.02 Acceptable H Div. 0.2 Y Range .954.05

### STACK TEMPERATURE SENSOR CALIBRATION DATA FORM


# \\IW5 ( Thermocouple number 

# PUN\S-• ir a )rdoring 'peck' Ws, Inc. 

### F-Quatyscurcerestng

Date Ambient temperature t 3 

# 1 

# or Barometric pressure _,30.C r 3 

### in Hg
Calibrator 0,k) Reference: mercury-in-glass / 

## oI.her

Reference. point 

## number' Reference Thermocouple h thermometer potentiometer Tepper a ture Source temperature, temperature, I 

### (specify) "C difference c



## 13 4,1 

# i‘x°

e I 

# tho *-3 It\ 

# 360
I X\ 1)b

a Every 30°C (50°F) for each reference point.

Type of calibration system used. [ ref tem., 

### °C + 273 test thermom tem., ref temp, C + 273 + 27311 100<1.5%.

Quality Assurance Handbook N2-2.10ti

throne indicating levet position for deleiminIng at and us.

throe indicating level goatee tor determining 

## p. and Ps.

Deipe• indicating levet petition ter 

### determinInge

Dr 

### _z

Deem* indkallng Bevel p..ldon Ter detemlnInta then calculate Z. 

### CALIBRATION DATA SHEET 2 Type S Mot Tuba Inspection

Damaged/ of 1-10

• 

### S a1 s +10E1

a 

### (AO° 5 az s + 10°)
13 1 1-5° 5 a l 5 +5°1 (-5• s az

. 5 + 5•)



### 0

I tt e A 

### tan 

## r Is 0.1251 w — A tan 0 15 0.031251 Level and Perpendicular/ Obstruction/



# 0 0

D 

### t (3/16" 5 D i s 3/81 A AnD, (1.05 5 P A/13 1 51.5) 

## 37E'

- E'-
en 

## /. "Ls'

UA/OC Check 

### Completeness Legibility Accuracy- Specifications Reasonableness
rartIllcallon 

### salty that the Type S pilot tube/probe ID/ 

## f..2 meets of exceeds all specifications, anemia and/or applicable design features and Is hereby assigned a pilot tube calibration lector C of 0.84. 

# -.1.adct Person 

# e el ISignatute/Datel Certified by:

### &Islam Lancaster East

Tank #



# -45

/2 .20a

Page of 

# 171 7 t 

# v

/t" 

# 44 4

- ;R&M •74Ekli1llnin

Plating Tank Times

### Paga_Zota Plating Tank Times

### vision: Lancaster East Cylinder
Ru 

### Size



# 3

3

-±3
-113 43 rank 

## #



## it /2-12J0 

# (bb 

# r /00/1

1 00" sarC 

# /10 

# 75 11.4110

4-3

Plating

- rank Times

### Plating Tank Times

vision:

ink #

a . , .-.-, 1 

# . ,4 .



### Lancaster n



### East

/00 

### C Under 

# V ,

1)-



# (141- / 3 

### raillniggvilnirMINCITIETnrigillin7rAirlan 7

,



### Date: Time of da


# 00 n r: 1

A I



## 111117TUTTAII 

# g',/6. I

k .

; 8 

### 54 0 

### Am • 

### -hr

--• 

### I ...

• 

### II gi 1



# t f ri-?/ /0.5" 

# 1 2), '72 

# // C‘c. la 

# pc' FISC) 3 Iv 6 

# 9: g ' 

# il St 0

- 3 /00 1i1/4)-p- 

# 9c- 2 7 

# it: sa< 

# SE /0 0 

# ki • -PI 770 2 

# i c 9: s .' a 5 // o



# . 5 /00 t i u -/37 9135

Page_Loti

### Date:. 

# rrjIIIMIIrlTillIllrnrLillurnrirgntV;111F117r1RT411FTI )1vIslon: Lancaster East C Under Tank # Comments

uP074>< n 7794

Plating Tank Times

## Plating Tank Times Ilvlsion: Lancaster East C linda Tank

/5 o7-

## Pressure lime Drop

t et> i '3. 

# IC :I i5" 3

/01 /5 L 3-2- 

# egg-- Comments 

# Chromium Emission Compliance Test 

# Division: Lancaster East Date: 

# AbleiC
Test Number: 

# 7VInitials

# Chromium Emission Compliance Test 

# Division: Lancaster East Date: /0/2- s-sTest Number:

Pressure Time Drop 

# /Of )I ; ( 54) 

# 3.2- 

# 3 3.L

3.7_ Comments Initials



# 06/t cB

# Chromium Emission Compliance Test
Division: Lancaster East 

# ilas

Test Number
Pressure Drop Comments Initials Time 

## Date:



# 330 -z_ 3. -2- 3: 2:-