alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>
                                                                 EXHIBIT 10.28.2

GENERAL DYNAMICS
Armament and Technical Products

September 23, 2003
In response reply to 03DAP09-0025

American Technology Corporation
13114 Evening Creek Drive S.
San Diego, CA 92128 USA

Attention: Terry Conrad/Carl Gruenler

Reference: License and Remarketer Agreement between American Technology
Corporation ("ATC") and Bath Iron Works Corporation (BIW), dated February 13,
2003 ("License").

Effective September 4, 2003, the referenced License was assigned, pursuant to
Article 13(e) therein, from BIW to its Affiliate, General Dynamics Armament and
Technical Products, Inc., located at 128 Lakeside Avenue, Burlington, Vermont
05401-4985 ("GDATP").

Pursuant to Article 13(i) of the License, GDATP requests all future notices be
delivered to:

     Director of Contracts
     General Dynamics Armament and Technical Products, Inc.
     128 Lakeside Avenue
     Burlington, Vermont 05401-4985     Fax: (802) 657-7203

With a copy to:

     General Counsel
     General Dynamics Armament and Technical Products, Inc.
     128 Lakeside Avenue
     Burlington, Vermont 05401-4985     Fax: (802) 657-6590

Please direct any questions to the undersigned.

Sincerely,


/s/ Duane A. Patrick

Duane A. Patrick
Manager, Contracts Operations
EXHIBIT 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. {section} 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of China Bright Star Limited (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending December 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Jeremy Mork, Chief Executive and Financial  Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. {section} 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes- Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



|Dated:  February 14, 2011
By  /s/ Jeremy Mork
-----------------------------
    Jeremy Mork
    Chief Executive and  Financial Officer
   (Principal Executive and Financial Officer)
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
<PAGE>   1
                                      21.1

                                  SUBSIDIARIES

<PAGE>   2
                                  Exhibit 21.1

                                  Subsidiaries


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                 SUBSIDIARY                           FORM                             OWNER                    OWNERSHIP
                 ----------                           ----                             -----                    ---------

    <S>                                            <C>                     <C>                                    <C>
    Sports Facilities, Inc.                        Corporation             The Sports Club Company, Inc.          100.000%

    TVE, Inc.                                      Corporation             The Sports Club Company, Inc.          100.000%

    Century City Spectrum, Inc.                    Corporation             The Sports Club Company, Inc.          100.000%

    The Sports Connection Holding Company          Corporation             The Sports Club Company, Inc.          100.000%

    Jackson Sports Limited, Inc.                   Corporation             The Sports Club Company, Inc.          100.000%

    The Spectrum Club Company, Inc.                Corporation             The Sports Club Company, Inc.          100.000%

    Sports Club, Inc. of California                Corporation             The Sports Club Company, Inc.          100.000%

    Pontius Realty, Inc.                           Corporation             The Sports Club Company, Inc.          100.000%

    Irvine Sports Club, Inc.                       Corporation             The Sports Club Company, Inc.          100.000%

    HealthFitness Organization of America, Inc.    Corporation             The Sports Club Company, Inc.          100.000%

    SCC Sports Club, Inc.                          Corporation             The Sports Club Company, Inc.          100.000%

    L.A./Irvine Sports Clubs, Ltd.                 Partnership             Sports Club, Inc. of California         50.100%

    Talla New York, Inc.                           Corporation             Sports Club, Inc. of California        100.000%

    Reebok-Sports Club/NY                          Partnership             Talla New York, Inc.                    40.000%

    El Segundo-TDC, Ltd.                           Partnership             The Spectrum Club Company, Inc.         17.185%
                                                                           Pontius Realty, Inc.                     0.754%
                                                                           Sports Club, Inc. of California          9.890%
                                                                           The Sports Club Company, Inc.            9.890%

    Sports Connection ES/MB                        Partnership             The Spectrum Club Company, Inc.         43.730%
                                                                           El Segundo-TDC, Ltd.                     6.270%
</TABLE>
##### 



Exhibit 99.2

National Rural Utilities Cooperative Finance Corporation
Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
(18 U.S.C. Section 1350)

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Sections 1350(a) and (b)), the undersigned hereby
certifies as follows:



|1. |  | I am the Chief Financial Officer of National Rural Utilities Cooperative Finance Corporation (CFC).
|-- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|  
|2. |  | To the best of my knowledge:                                                                         



| | (A) |  | The Rural Electric Cooperative
Grantor Trust (Soyland) 1993-B2s March 31, 2003 Form 10-K
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report) fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the
Exchange Act); and
| | --- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
| | (B) |  | The information in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Rural Electric Cooperative Grantor Trust
(Soyland) 1993-B2.                                                                                             

|                      |  |                                                               
|--------------------- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------
|Dated: March 27, 2003 |  | By: /s/ STEVEN L. LILLYSteven L. Lilly
Chief Financial Officer

18
## In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

No. 02

- 22

- 00431

- CV

M ICHAEL D AMIEN D UNN

, Appellant

V

.

P AMELA S UE D UNN , Appellee §

§

§

§ On Appeal from the 442nd District

Court

of D e nton County ( 19

- 3053

- 442 )

August 31 , 2023

Memorandum Opinion by Justice

Bassel

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that there

was no error in the trial court’s divorce decree . It is ordered that the di vorce decree is

affirmed.

It is further ordered that A ppellant Mic hael Damien Dunn shall pay all costs of

this appeal, for which let execution issue.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

By /s/ Dabney Bassel

Justice Dabney Bassel
THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13-22-00125-CR

Gary Garcia

v.

The State of Texas

On Appeal from the

24th District Court of DeWitt County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 20-02-13,263

JUDGMENT

THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on 

appeal, concludes that the judgment of the trial court should be affirmed. The Court 

orders the judgment of the trial court AFFIRMED.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

August 11, 2022
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 17-10619

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

CHRISTOPHER LADALE SANDERS,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 3:07-CR-338-5

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, JONES, and SMITH, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Christopher Ladale 

Sanders has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance 

with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 

632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Sanders has not filed a response. We have 

reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected 

therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no 

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

March 19, 2018

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 17-10619 Document: 00514391305 Page: 1 Date Filed: 03/19/2018
No. 17-10619

2

nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave 

to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities 

herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

 Case: 17-10619 Document: 00514391305 Page: 2 Date Filed: 03/19/2018
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit ______________________

CORNING OPTICAL COMMUNICATIONS LLC, 

Appellant

v.

DALI WIRELESS INC., 

Appellee

______________________

2023-1275

______________________

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark 

Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. IPR2021-

00762.

______________________

O R D E R

The parties having so agreed, it is ordered that:

(1) The proceeding is DISMISSED under Fed. R. App. 

P. 42 (b).

Case: 23-1275 Document: 9 Page: 1 Filed: 01/24/2023
CORNING OPTICAL COMMUNICATIONS LLC V. DALI WIRELESS 

INC.

2

(2) Each side shall bear their own costs.

FOR THE COURT

January 24, 2023

Date /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner

Peter R. Marksteiner 

Clerk of Court

ISSUED AS A MANDATE: January 24, 2023

Case: 23-1275 Document: 9 Page: 2 Filed: 01/24/2023
**Exhibit 23****CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on Form S-3(Nos. 333-04947, 333-25717, 333-46357, 333-51588, 333-62599, 333-122221, 333-125040, 333-128862 and333-138102) and Form S-8 (File Nos. 333-32579, 333-66041, 333-69869, 333-102662, 333-126228 and333-126230) of FelCor Lodging Trust Incorporated of our report dated February 29, 2008 relating tothe financial statements, financial statement schedules and the effectiveness of internal controlover financial reporting, which appears in this Form 10-K./s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4029 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4029

To authorize the Secretary of Transportation to issue a certificate of 
   documentation with appropriate endorsement for employment in the 
                coastwise trade for the vessel ALIENTO.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 11, 1994

Mr. Hochbrueckner introduced the following bill; which was referred to 
             the Committee on Merchant Marine and Fisheries

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To authorize the Secretary of Transportation to issue a certificate of 
   documentation with appropriate endorsement for employment in the 
                coastwise trade for the vessel ALIENTO.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled, That notwithstanding 
section 27 of the Merchant Marine Act, 1920 (46 App. U.S.C. 883), the 
Act of June 19, 1886 (46 App. U.S.C. 289), and section 12106 of title 
46, United States Code, the Secretary of Transportation may issue a 
certificate of documentation with appropriate endorsement for 
employment in the coastwise trade for the vessel ALIENTO (United States 
official number 531946).

                                 <all>
```
**Exhibit 32.2**

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**

** PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of VR Holdings, Inc. for the fiscal quarter ending December 31, 2012, I, John E. Baker, Chief Financial Officer of VR Holdings, Inc., hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that:

1.

Such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ending December 31, 2012, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.

The information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ending December 31, 2012, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of VR Holdings, Inc.

Date: February 19, 2013.

  /s/ John E. Baker

John E. Baker, Chief Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer of VR Holdings, Inc
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

**SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION OFPRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER OF LOOP INDUSTRIES, INC.**

 

In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A of Loop Industries, Inc. for the quarter ended August 31, 2015, the undersigned, Daniel Solomita, President of Loop Industries, Inc., does hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1) 
such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A for the quarter ended August 31, 2015 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
  (2) 
the information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A for the quarter ended August 31, 2015 fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Loop Industries, Inc.
 

 

| Date: August 12, 2016 | By:    | */s/ Daniel Solomita*                                               |   |
|----------------------------|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                            |   | Daniel Solomita                                                     |   |
|                            |   | President and Chief Executive Officer (principal executive officer, |   |
|                            |   | principal financial officer and principal accounting officer        |   |
#### Winston H. MORSE, Petitioner, v. Louie L. WAINWRIGHT, Director, Division of Corrections, State of Florida, Respondent.

No. 73-145.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Feb. 20, 1973.

Habeas corpus denied.
**EXHIBIT 23.3**

 

**June 11, 2008**

 

**CONSENT OF BDO KAZAKHSTANAUDIT LLP.**

**INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

 

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements pertaining to BMB Munai, Inc. of our report dated June 26, 2006, relating to the consolidated financial statements of BMB Munai, Inc. included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended March 31, 2008.

 

 

**Managing partner,**

**General Director**

| **BDO Kazakhstanaudit LLP** | S. Kh. Koshkimbayev |
|-----------------------------|---------------------|
EXHIBIT 18.1  April 28,
2005  Board of Directors Veritas
DGC Inc. 10300
Town Park Dr. Houston,
TX 77072  Dear Directors:  We are providing this
letter to you for inclusion as an exhibit to your Form 10-K filing
pursuant to Item 601 of Regulation S-K.  We have audited the
consolidated financial statements included in the Companys Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the year ended July 31, 2004 and issued our report thereon dated
April 28, 2005.  Note 1 to the financial
statements describes a change in estimate effected by a change in accounting
principle for the multi-client data library amortization policy.  Under the prior method, capitalized costs of
multi-client surveys were charged to cost of services in the period sales
occurred (the sales forecast method) over an estimated five-year useful life,
however, during the last 24 months of each surveys useful life, amortization
was the greater of the amount based on sales or straight-line amortization of
the net book value over the remaining period of the original estimated
five-year useful life. Under the new method, capitalized costs of multi-client
surveys are charged to cost of services over an estimated five-year useful life
based on the greater of the result under the sales forecast method or
cumulative straight-line amortization from inception over an estimated
five-year useful life. It should be understood that the preferability of one
acceptable method of accounting over another for amortizing multi-client data
library costs has not been addressed in any authoritative accounting
literature, and in expressing our concurrence below we have relied on
managements determination that this change in estimate effected by a change in
accounting principle is preferable. 
Based on our reading of managements stated reasons and justification
for this change in estimate effected by a change in accounting principle in the
Form 10-K, and our discussions with management as to their judgment about the
relevant business planning factors relating to the change, we concur with
management that such change represents, in the Companys circumstances, the
adoption of a preferable accounting principle in conformity with Accounting
Principles Board Opinion No. 20 paragraph 32.  Very truly yours,   PricewaterhouseCoopers
LLP
250 La. 251

#### HANDYMAN HOMES, INC., d/b/a Albert D. Kendrick, Contractor, v. ADMINISTRATOR, DIVISION OF EMPLOYMENT SECURITY OF DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, State of Louisiana, and Joe Ferguson.

No. 48531.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Feb. 20, 1967.

In re: F. C. Doyal, Jr., Administrator of the Division of Employment Security, Department of Labor, State of Louisiana, applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, Parish of East Feliciana. 192 So.2d 827.

Writ refused. On the facts found by the Court of Appeal we find no error of law in its judgment.

McCALEB, J., is of the opinion that a writ should be granted.
Menu

Related Topics: PRIA Fees

About Pesticide Registration Fees under PRIA

FIFRA amendments passed by Congress in 2004 created a registration service fee system for 

applications for specific pesticide registration, amended registration, and associated tolerance 

actions. The goals of this fee system are to:

• create a more predictable evaluation process for affected pesticide decisions, and 

• couple the collection of individual fees with specific decision review periods. 

The 2004 amendments are also known as the Pesticide Registration Improvement Act of 2003 

(PRIA).

Related Information

• Pesticide Registration Manual (Blue Book)

• PRIA Overview and History

• Comparison of Features across PRIA 1, 2, and 3

PRIA fees have been reauthorized twice, most recently by the Pesticide Registration Improvement 

Extension Act (PRIA 3). This reauthorization expires September 30, 2017.

View copies of PRIA legislation.

PRIA established Section 33 of FIFRA. The amendments are reflected in the current version:

See FIFRA Section 33--Pesticide Registration Service Fees (also cited as U.S. Code Title 7, 

Chapter 6, Subchapter II, Section 136w-8)

Actions subject to fees are categorized:

• First by type of chemical: 

◦ Conventional.

◦ Antimicrobial.

◦ Biopesticide.

About Pesticide Registration Fees under PRIA | Pesticide Registration Improvement Exte... Page 1 of 2

http://www2.epa.gov/pria-fees/about-pesticide-registration-fees-under-pria 12/3/2015
◦ Inert ingredients.

• Next by the type of action: 

◦ New active ingredient.

◦ New use.

◦ Import and other tolerances.

◦ New products.

◦ Amendments.

◦ Miscellaneous.

Under this system, each individual category corresponds to a certain registration service fee and 

decision review period.

The fees and decision review periods may change from one fiscal year to the next, and fees are 

periodically increased as prescribed by statute. Applicants should refer to the fee determination 

decision tree or fee table for assistance in finding the appropriate PRIA category and fee for their 

submission.

To determine whether an applicant qualifies for a fee waiver, see these pages:

• Small business fee waivers

• Guidance on IR-4 fee exemptions

• Exemptions for federal and state governments

Fees and Applications describes where and how to pay fees and what to submit. 

PRIA Legislation

Pesticide Registration Improvement Act of 2003 (PRIA I) (PDF) (455 pp, 1.23 MB, About PDF) 

(see pages 419-434)

Pesticide Registration Improvement Renewal Act of 2007 (PRIA 2) (PDF) (8 pp, 146.9 K, About 

PDF)

Pesticide Registration Improvement Extension Act of 2012 (PRIA 3) (PDF) (81 pp, 337.64 K, 

About PDF)

Last updated on September 21, 2015

About Pesticide Registration Fees under PRIA | Pesticide Registration Improvement Exte... Page 2 of 2

http://www2.epa.gov/pria-fees/about-pesticide-registration-fees-under-pria 12/3/2015
Exhibit 32.1

Certification
of Principal Executive OfficerPursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Phoenix Agri Enterprises, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period
ended July 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Benjamin
Chen, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained
in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

|Date: September 21, 2011 |                                                         | /s/ Benjamin Chen
|------------------------ | ------------------------------------------------------- | -----------------
|                         | Name: Benjamin Chen
        Principal Executive Officer