alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
BALANCE SHEET AS OF MARCH 30, 1997 AND STATEMENT OF INCOME FOR THE
FIFTY-TWO WEEKS ENDED MARCH 30, 1997 OF AMERILINK CORPORATION AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-30-1997
<CASH>                                         120,395
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               13,729,789
<ALLOWANCES>                                   171,000
<INVENTORY>                                  1,509,840
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            20,087,761
<PP&E>                                       5,928,062<F1>
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0<F1>
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              26,211,111
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        6,408,699
<BONDS>                                      9,000,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     8,084,645
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,717,767
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                26,211,111
<SALES>                                     63,035,814
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            63,035,814
<CGS>                                       41,297,467
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               59,734,363
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               (7,047)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             617,004
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              2,691,494
<INCOME-TAX>                                 1,123,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,568,494
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,568,494
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.44
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.44
<FN>
<F1> PROPERTY, PLANT, AND EQUIPMENT IS REPORTED NET OF ACCUMULATED
     DEPRECIATION ON THE CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 379

To require random drug testing of Federal legislative branch officers and

employees.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JANUARY 5, 1993

Mr. SOLOMON introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on House Administration

A BILL

To require random drug testing of Federal legislative branch

officers and employees.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That each House of Congress, and each other entity with4 in the legislative branch, shall require random drug testing

5 of officers and employees within their respective bodies.

Æ
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.5

                        CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

The Board of Directors
Entel Telefonia Personal S.A.

    We consent to the use in this Registration Statement of Propel, Inc. on
Form S-1 of our report dated January 21, 2000, except for Note 29 as to which
the date is April 24, 2000, (relating to the consolidated financial statements
of Entel Telefonia Personal S.A. and Subsidiaries) and to the reference to our
firm under the heading "Experts" in the prospectus.

                                           /s/ Deloitte & Touche

Santiago, Chile
September 18, 2000
Exhibit 13

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Nokia Corporation (the Company) on Form 20-F for the period ending December 31, 2012, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned hereby certify that to the best of our knowledge:



|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                    |  |                     |  |                                                     
|------------------- |  | ------------------- |  | ----------------------------------------------------
|Date: March 7, 2013 |  | /s/ STEPHEN ELOP   
|                    |  | Name:               |  | Stephen Elop                                        
|                    |  | Title:              |  | President and Chief Executive Officer               
|                    | 
|Date: March 7, 2013 |  | /s/ TIMO IHAMUOTILA
|                    |  | Name:               |  | Timo Ihamuotila                                     
|                    |  | Title:              |  | Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
STORAGE TANK B

STORAGE TANK A

9000 kg of pTHF 1000 

H C i G

REACTOR

STORAGE TANK A
EX-10.13



 Exhibit 10.13 

Schedule to Senior Vice President Severance Agreement 

The following is a list of our officers who are party to the company’s Senior Vice President Severance Agreement, the form of which was
filed as an exhibit to the company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ending 9/28/2013: 
 Arthur Friedman 

Stephen Furlong 
 David Harding 

Rohan Hastie, Ph.D. 
 Carter Houghton 

Zhenxue Jing 
 Robert Lavallee 

Holly Lynch 
 Roger Mills 

John Pekarsky 
 David Rudzinsky 

Jay Stein 
 Monte Tucker
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 06-6829

BILLY LEE WEBB, JR., Petitioner - Appellant, versus DIRECTOR OF VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Jackson L. Kiser, Senior District Judge. (7:05-cv-00654-jlk) Submitted: September 26, 2006 Decided: October 2, 2006 Before WIDENER and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Billy Lee Webb, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Kathleen Beatty Martin, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: Billy Lee Webb, Jr., seeks to appeal the district court’s orders denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000) petition and Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e) motion to alter or amend judgment. The orders are not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that any assessment of the constitutional claims by the district court is debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by the district court is likewise debatable. Miller-El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee, 252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Webb has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
----

----

|   | 1.           The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2.           The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company. |
|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date: November 23, 2015 | By:    | /s/Joanne Sylvanus                                                                                              |   |
|-------------------------|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                    | Name:  | Joanne Sylvanus                                                                                                 |   |
|                    | Title: | Chief Financial Officer, Secretary, and Director (Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer) |   |

----
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

FRANCISCO DE ARAGON,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D22-1481

[December 22, 2022]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.850 motion from the Circuit Court for 

the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Michael Rothschild,

Judge; L.T. Case No. 15-6543CF10A.

Matthew R. McLain of McLain Law, P.A., Longwood, for appellant.

No appearance required for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

KLINGENSMITH, C.J., CONNER and KUNTZ, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
EXHIBIT 32.1

                           SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION

         In connection with the quarterly report of First Titan(the "Company")
on Form 10-Q for the period ended December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Robert Tatar, President of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. SS. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.

March 10, 2011                         /s/ Robert Tatar
                                       ----------------
                                       Robert Tatar, President, Principal
                                       Executive Officer, Principal Financial
                                       and Accounting officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In  connection  with the  Quarterly  Report of Soton Holding Group, Inc. (the "Company")  on Form 10-Q for the period  ended  March 31,  2011 as filed with the Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof (the  "Report"),  the undersigned,  in the  capacities  and  on  the  dates  indicated  below,  hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:



1.   The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of  1934; and



2.   The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all material respects,  the financial  condition and   results of operations  of the Company.



Date: April 15, 2011





/s/ Mariya Kokho

__________________________

Mariya Kokho, President,

Chief Executive Officer and

Chief Financial Officer
----

Prior notification of a concentration

(Case COMP/M.3682 — INTEK/GIM)

Candidate case for simplified procedure

(2005/C 18/04)

(Text with EEA relevance)

----

(1)OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

(2)  Available on DG COMP website:

http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/legislation/consultation/simplified_tru.pdf.

----
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3724 Reported in House (RH)]

                                                 House Calendar No. 161

103d CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 3724

                          [Report No. 103-513]

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

   To designate the United States courthouse located in Bridgeport, 
        Connecticut, as the ``Brien McMahon Federal Building''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                              May 19, 1994

        Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed

                                                 House Calendar No. 161
103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 3724

                          [Report No. 103-513]

   To designate the United States courthouse located in Bridgeport, 
        Connecticut, as the ``Brien McMahon Federal Building''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 25, 1994

Mrs. Kennelly introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
              Committee on Public Works and Transportation

                              May 19, 1994

        Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To designate the United States courthouse located in Bridgeport, 
        Connecticut, as the ``Brien McMahon Federal Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The United States courthouse located at 915 Lafayette Boulevard in 
Bridgeport, Connecticut, shall be known and designated as the ``Brien 
McMahon Federal Building''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the courthouse referred to in section 1 
shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Brien McMahon Federal 
Building''.
```
Exhibit 15(a)

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We
hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 333-212122, 333-211574, 333-210546, 333-210545, 333-202869, 333-202866, 333-194197, 333-194196, 333-187096, 333-179982, 333-173974, 333-157795 and
333-141674) of Nokia Corporation of our report dated March 23, 2017 relating to the consolidated financial statements and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, which appears in this Form 20-F.



|                             
|-----------------------------
|/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers Oy
|Helsinki, Finland            
|March 23, 2017
11TH COURT OF APPEALS

EASTLAND, TEXAS

JUDGMENT

Traci Lee Alaniz, * From the 244th District Court

of Ector County,

Trial Court No. C-19-0578-CR.

Vs. No. 11-19-00399-CR * July 14, 2022

The State of Texas, * Opinion by Trotter, J. 

(Panel consists of: Bailey, C.J.,

Trotter, J., and Williams, J.

This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that there is no 

error in the judgment below. Therefore, in accordance with this court’s opinion, 

the judgment of the trial court is in all things affirmed.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-7275

DALLAS FERRELL,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

HENRY DARGAN MCMASTER, Attorney General of the

State of South Carolina; JON E. OZMINT,

Director, South Carolina Department of

Corrections,

Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Beaufort. Margaret B. Seymour, District Judge.

(CA-03-99-9-24)

Submitted: November 6, 2003 Decided: November 20, 2003

Before WIDENER, MICHAEL, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Dallas Ferrell, Appellant Pro Se. Donald John Zelenka, Chief Deputy

Attorney General, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Dallas Ferrell seeks to appeal the district court’s order

accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying

relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000). An

appeal may not be taken from the final order in a § 2254 proceeding

unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of

appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of

appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the

denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000).

A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable

jurists would find that his constitutional claims are debatable and

that any dispositive procedural rulings by the district court are

also debatable or wrong. See Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U. S. 322,

 , 123 S. Ct. 1029, 1039 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473,

484 (2000); Rose v. Lee, 252 F.3d 676, 683 (4th Cir. 2001). We have

independently reviewed the record and conclude that Ferrell has not

made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of

appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
I

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 3880

To prohibit the Secretary of Health and Human Services from finding that

a State medicaid plan is not in compliance with title XIX of the Social

Security Act solely on the grounds that the plan does not cover abortions

for pregnancies resulting from an act of rape or incest if coverage

for such abortions is inconsistent with State law.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

FEBRUARY 23, 1994

Mr. DICKEY (for himself, Mr. DORNAN, Mr. EMERSON, Mr. BARTLETT of

Maryland, Mr. BUNNING, Mr. TALENT, Mr. ISTOOK, Mr. KNOLLENBERG,

Mr. BACHUS of Alabama, Mr. INGLIS of South Carolina, Mr. SOLOMON,

Mr. ARMEY, Mr. LINDER, Mr. MCCRERY, Mr. BARTON of Texas, Mr.

PENNY, Mr. BEREUTER, Mr. LIPINSKI, and Mr. BOEHNER) introduced

the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and

Commerce

A BILL

To prohibit the Secretary of Health and Human Services

from finding that a State medicaid plan is not in compliance with title XIX of the Social Security Act solely

on the grounds that the plan does not cover abortions

for pregnancies resulting from an act of rape or incest

if coverage for such abortions is inconsistent with State

law.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

HR 3880 IH

1 SECTION 1. PROHIBITING FINDING OF NON-COMPLIANCE

2 WITH MEDICAID REQUIREMENTS BASED ON

3 FAILURE OF STATE PLAN TO COVER ABOR4 TIONS FOR PREGNANCIES RESULTING FROM

5 RAPE OR INCEST.

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding any provision of

7 title XIX of the Social Security Act (including section

8 1902(a)(10)(A) of such Act), the Secretary of Health and

9 Human Services may not find that a State plan for medi10 cal assistance under such title fails to meet the require11 ments of such title for any quarter solely on the grounds

12 that the State does not provide for coverage of an abortion

13 under the State plan during the quarter for a pregnancy

14 resulting from an act of rape or incest if coverage for such

15 an abortion is inconsistent with State law.

16 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—Subsection (a) shall apply to

17 quarters beginning on or after October 1, 1993.

Æ
|   | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Rule 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Dated:  November 2, 2015 | /s/ Gary Okizaki________________________________    |
|------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------|
|                               | Gary Okizaki, Principal Executive Officer           |
|                               |                                                |
|                               |                                                |
| Dated:  November 2, 2015 | /s/ Brian Yamauchi_________________________________ |
|                               | Brian Yamauchi, Principal Financial Officer         |

----

----
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

    We hereby consent to the use in this Registration Statement on Form S-1 of
our reports dated August 29, 2000, except as to the second paragraph of Note 1,
which is as of September 6, 2000, relating to the financial statements and
financial statement schedule of Oplink Communications, Inc. and May 24, 2000
relating to the financial statements of Telelight Communication Inc. which
appear in such Registration Statement. We also consent to the references to us
under the heading "Experts" in such Registration Statement.

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

San Jose, California
October 2, 2000