### USEPA REGION IX TECHNICAL SUPPORT DOCUMENT

for SJVUAPCD Rule 9510 ATTACHMENT 52008 Annual Report on the District's IndirectSource Review Program
can address one of the issues that have led to California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) legal challenges to development projects within the SJVAB. Implementation of a DMC is complementary to ISR; project emissions are characterized, mitigation funds are paid to the District, the District administers the funds to secure the required emission reduction projects. A prerequisite for the District to enter into a DMC is that the DMC will exceed the air quality benefits achieved by compliance with Rule 9510. Therefore, developers who enter into a DMC are considered in compliance with District Rule 9510. This report therefore includes revenues and emission reductions resulting from DMCs. During this reporting period, the District received no new off-site mitigation fees from development mitigation contracts. However, DMC funds carried forward from the previous reporting period were used to fund off-site emission reduction projects. 

### IV. 2007-2008 

### ANALYSIS Table -1: 

### Summarv of 

### ISR Program for 2007 

### to 2008

# I Total ISR Program 

# I 1 Beninnina Balance 

# I$/ 5.090.869 

# I (

. Total

.Application

......Fees Received

.... - ...... .......... -- Total Administrative Fees Received

.. -. .......................... Total Amount Off-Site Fees Received

... - . ... .... *.......... Total Fees Received 

# I Total Amount Spent (Contracted) 

### 151 3,125,191 

# 1 - - -- -- GrandTotal of Available Off-Site Fees 

# 1 Grant Total BalanceofAvailable Off-Site Fees 

# I $ 

# 1 7,358,131 

# I $ Total Balance of Available Off-SiteFees

. . . .............. 

### - Total Amount Refunded - - - 10,483,322



# 1 Total Off-SiteAchieved Emission Reductions 

# I Tons 

# 1 251.56 

# 1 9.09 

# 1 260.65 

# 1 $ $
NOx I . .................. 7,358,131 0

I I I 1 PMlO Emission ReductionsCost Effectiveness (averagebased onprojects funded) Total

Total ON-SITE Projected Emission Reductions - .............. .-........ 

### --
. .. Total OFF-SITE Projected Emission Reductions $/Ton 11,928



# , Total Projected Emission Reductions Tons 2,077.52 1,086.78 3,164.50 Tons Tons 1,009.61 

# 1 305.20

......... .... . .- . ........... 

### _ 1,067.91 : 781.78 1,314.81

.......... 1,849.69

### 2005, the District's Board adopted Rule 3180 (Administrative Fees for Indirect Source Review). Provisionsof Rule 3180 establish an application filing fee structure of $400for residential and $600 for non-residential projects. Additionally, if a project is subject to off-site emission reduction fees, the developer is required to pay an adrninistrativefee equal to four percent (4%) of the required off-sitefees. This fee is to cover the District's cost of administering the off-site emission reduction program. Development Mitisation Contracts A Development Mitigation Contract (DMC) is an air quality mitigation measure by which a developer voluntarily enters into a contractual agreement with the District to reduce a development project's impact on air quality beyond that achieved by compliance with District Rule 9510. By fully mitigating the project's impact on air quality, a developer can address one of the issues that have led to California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) legal challengesto development projects within the SJVAB. Implementation of a DMC is comparable to ISR; project emissions are characterized, funds are paid to the District, the District administers the funds to secure the required emission reduction projects. A prerequisite for the District to enter into a DMC is that the DMC will exceed the air quality benefits achieved by compliance with Rule 9510. Therefore, developers who enter into a DMC are considered in compliance with District Rule 9510. This report therefore includes revenues and emission reductions resulting from DMCs. 

### IV. 2006 

# -2007 

### ANALYSIS Table-I: Summarv of ISR Programfor 2006

### to 2007 

## I Total 

## I Total Application Fees received 56,051 --- Administrative Fees received 515.295 -- TotalAmount Off-Site Fees received FFees received 13,489,322 --ppppp -- -- Total Amount spent 

## $I 9,549,668 I I ---- ptal Amount remaining (balance) -- 3,368,308

------

Amount refunded ----- -- 

## 1 I I NOx PMlO Total 

## I ---- Cost Effectiveness $no,, Total Emissions Reduction realized -- 11,133 Tons 824.07 33.71 857.78