Facility _Information facility _id utility

_code legal_owner_nam e

legl_operator_name

legal_address_type

legal_address

legal_city legal_state legal_zip 1104 9417 Interstate Power and Light Interstate Power and Light

legal owner200 First Street SE Cedar Rapids

IA 52401

Page 1Facility _Information plant_nam e

physical_address

phyical_city

physical_state

physical_zip

ma iling_address

ma iling_city

ma iling_state

ma iling_zip Burlington 4282 Sullivan Slough Burlington IA 52601 4282 Sullivan Slough Burlington IA 52601

Page 2Facility _Information RFA_small_entity

ff_fired_coal

ff_fired_oil ff_fired_ngas ff_fired_petcoke

ff_fired_other

ff_permitted_coal

ff_permitted_oil

ff_permitted_ngas No TRUE FALSE TRUE FALSE FALSE TRUE TRUE TRUE

Page 3Facility _Information ff_permitted_petcoke

ff_permitted_other

deviation_reporting

continuous_emissions

cem_provided

facility _note FALSE TRUE Excess Emission Report, Quarterly Report, Semi-annual monitoring report, Annual Compliance certification. Yes Facility : BurlingtonThrough this electronic submittal, Interstate Power and Light Company (“IPL”) responds to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s (“U.S. EPA”) mercury and hazardous air pollutant information collection request (“ICR”), which was issued pursuant to section 114 of the Clean Air Act (“CAA”). IPL is also providing certain confidential business information under a separate cover letter. IPL conducted a diligent review of records and a diligent interviewing process of employees who m ay have knowledge of the information requested in the subject ICR. IPL is responding to the specific data requests within the subject ICR to the best of its ability, and based upon its reasonable interpretation and understanding of the specific data requests. Additionally , IPL has reviewed and, where appropriate, used EPA’s answers to Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs), available at “Electrical Utilities MACT Information Collection Request” W eb site in the FAQ section, to guide its responses to ICR. T

Page 4Facility _Information Facility : BurlingtonThrough this electronic submittal, Interstate Power and Light Company (“IPL”) responds to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s (“U.S. EPA”) mercury and hazardous air pollutant information collection request (“ICR”), which was issued pursuant to section 114 of the Clean Air Act (“CAA”). IPL is also providing certain confidential business information under a separate cover letter. IPL conducted a diligent review of records and a diligent interviewing process of employees who m ay have knowledge of the information requested in the subject ICR. IPL is responding to the specific data requests within the subject ICR to the best of its ability, and based upon its reasonable interpretation and understanding of the specific data requests. Additionally , IPL has reviewed and, where appropriate, used EPA’s answers to Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs), available at “Electrical Utilities MACT Information Collection Request” W eb site in the FAQ section, to guide its responses to ICR. T

Page 5Facility _Information Facility : BurlingtonThrough this electronic submittal, Interstate Power and Light Company (“IPL”) responds to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s (“U.S. EPA”) mercury and hazardous air pollutant information collection request (“ICR”), which was issued pursuant to section 114 of the Clean Air Act (“CAA”). IPL is also providing certain confidential business information under a separate cover letter. IPL conducted a diligent review of records and a diligent interviewing process of employees who m ay have knowledge of the information requested in the subject ICR. IPL is responding to the specific data requests within the subject ICR to the best of its ability, and based upon its reasonable interpretation and understanding of the specific data requests. Additionally , IPL has reviewed and, where appropriate, used EPA’s answers to Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs), available at “Electrical Utilities MACT Information Collection Request” W eb site in the FAQ section, to guide its responses to ICR. T

Page 6Facility _Information Facility : BurlingtonThrough this electronic submittal, Interstate Power and Light Company (“IPL”) responds to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s (“U.S. EPA”) mercury and hazardous air pollutant information collection request (“ICR”), which was issued pursuant to section 114 of the Clean Air Act (“CAA”). IPL is also providing certain confidential business information under a separate cover letter. IPL conducted a diligent review of records and a diligent interviewing process of employees who m ay have knowledge of the information requested in the subject ICR. IPL is responding to the specific data requests within the subject ICR to the best of its ability, and based upon its reasonable interpretation and understanding of the specific data requests. Additionally , IPL has reviewed and, where appropriate, used EPA’s answers to Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs), available at “Electrical Utilities MACT Information Collection Request” W eb site in the FAQ section, to guide its responses to ICR. T

Page 7Facility _Information Facility : BurlingtonThrough this electronic submittal, Interstate Power and Light Company (“IPL”) responds to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s (“U.S. EPA”) mercury and hazardous air pollutant information collection request (“ICR”), which was issued pursuant to section 114 of the Clean Air Act (“CAA”). IPL is also providing certain confidential business information under a separate cover letter. IPL conducted a diligent review of records and a diligent interviewing process of employees who m ay have knowledge of the information requested in the subject ICR. IPL is responding to the specific data requests within the subject ICR to the best of its ability, and based upon its reasonable interpretation and understanding of the specific data requests. Additionally , IPL has reviewed and, where appropriate, used EPA’s answers to Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs), available at “Electrical Utilities MACT Information Collection Request” W eb site in the FAQ section, to guide its responses to ICR. T

Page 8Facility _Information Facility : BurlingtonThrough this electronic submittal, Interstate Power and Light Company (“IPL”) responds to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s (“U.S. EPA”) mercury and hazardous air pollutant information collection request (“ICR”), which was issued pursuant to section 114 of the Clean Air Act (“CAA”). IPL is also providing certain confidential business information under a separate cover letter. IPL conducted a diligent review of records and a diligent interviewing process of employees who m ay have knowledge of the information requested in the subject ICR. IPL is responding to the specific data requests within the subject ICR to the best of its ability, and based upon its reasonable interpretation and understanding of the specific data requests. Additionally , IPL has reviewed and, where appropriate, used EPA’s answers to Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs), available at “Electrical Utilities MACT Information Collection Request” W eb site in the FAQ section, to guide its responses to ICR. T

Page 9Facility _Information Facility : BurlingtonThrough this electronic submittal, Interstate Power and Light Company (“IPL”) responds to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s (“U.S. EPA”) mercury and hazardous air pollutant information collection request (“ICR”), which was issued pursuant to section 114 of the Clean Air Act (“CAA”). IPL is also providing certain confidential business information under a separate cover letter. IPL conducted a diligent review of records and a diligent interviewing process of employees who m ay have knowledge of the information requested in the subject ICR. IPL is responding to the specific data requests within the subject ICR to the best of its ability, and based upon its reasonable interpretation and understanding of the specific data requests. Additionally , IPL has reviewed and, where appropriate, used EPA’s answers to Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs), available at “Electrical Utilities MACT Information Collection Request” W eb site in the FAQ section, to guide its responses to ICR. T

Page 10Facility _Information Facility : BurlingtonThrough this electronic submittal, Interstate Power and Light Company (“IPL”) responds to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s (“U.S. EPA”) mercury and hazardous air pollutant information collection request (“ICR”), which was issued pursuant to section 114 of the Clean Air Act (“CAA”). IPL is also providing certain confidential business information under a separate cover letter. IPL conducted a diligent review of records and a diligent interviewing process of employees who m ay have knowledge of the information requested in the subject ICR. IPL is responding to the specific data requests within the subject ICR to the best of its ability, and based upon its reasonable interpretation and understanding of the specific data requests. Additionally , IPL has reviewed and, where appropriate, used EPA’s answers to Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs), available at “Electrical Utilities MACT Information Collection Request” W eb site in the FAQ section, to guide its responses to ICR. T

Page 11Facility _Information Facility : BurlingtonThrough this electronic submittal, Interstate Power and Light Company (“IPL”) responds to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s (“U.S. EPA”) mercury and hazardous air pollutant information collection request (“ICR”), which was issued pursuant to section 114 of the Clean Air Act (“CAA”). IPL is also providing certain confidential business information under a separate cover letter. IPL conducted a diligent review of records and a diligent interviewing process of employees who m ay have knowledge of the information requested in the subject ICR. IPL is responding to the specific data requests within the subject ICR to the best of its ability, and based upon its reasonable interpretation and understanding of the specific data requests. Additionally , IPL has reviewed and, where appropriate, used EPA’s answers to Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs), available at “Electrical Utilities MACT Information Collection Request” W eb site in the FAQ section, to guide its responses to ICR. T

Page 12Facility _Information Facility : BurlingtonThrough this electronic submittal, Interstate Power and Light Company (“IPL”) responds to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s (“U.S. EPA”) mercury and hazardous air pollutant information collection request (“ICR”), which was issued pursuant to section 114 of the Clean Air Act (“CAA”). IPL is also providing certain confidential business information under a separate cover letter. IPL conducted a diligent review of records and a diligent interviewing process of employees who m ay have knowledge of the information requested in the subject ICR. IPL is responding to the specific data requests within the subject ICR to the best of its ability, and based upon its reasonable interpretation and understanding of the specific data requests. Additionally , IPL has reviewed and, where appropriate, used EPA’s answers to Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs), available at “Electrical Utilities MACT Information Collection Request” W eb site in the FAQ section, to guide its responses to ICR. T

Page 13Facility _Information Facility : BurlingtonThrough this electronic submittal, Interstate Power and Light Company (“IPL”) responds to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s (“U.S. EPA”) mercury and hazardous air pollutant information collection request (“ICR”), which was issued pursuant to section 114 of the Clean Air Act (“CAA”). IPL is also providing certain confidential business information under a separate cover letter. IPL conducted a diligent review of records and a diligent interviewing process of employees who m ay have knowledge of the information requested in the subject ICR. IPL is responding to the specific data requests within the subject ICR to the best of its ability, and based upon its reasonable interpretation and understanding of the specific data requests. Additionally , IPL has reviewed and, where appropriate, used EPA’s answers to Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs), available at “Electrical Utilities MACT Information Collection Request” W eb site in the FAQ section, to guide its responses to ICR. T

Page 14facility _contacts facility _id contact_id contact_title contact_name

contact_phone1

contact_phone2

contact_email

contact_primary 1104 1 Manager Environmental Sevices Bradley G. Pincombe 6084584928 bradleypincombe@alliantenergy .com TRUE 1104 2 Environm ental Specialist Orvella Shipm an

6417913203 orvellashipm an@alliantenergy .com FALSE

Page 15facility _coal_utilized facility _id coal_type percentage_mass percentage_btu

synfuel_type

coal_note 1104 subbituminous 100 100

Page 16facility _oil_utilized facility _id oil_type percentage_volume percentage_btu

other_type

Page 17facility _other_materials facility _id other_material

permitted_burn

actually _burn other_quantity

other_quantity

_units other_note rcra_utilize rcra_explain 1104 Boiler cleaning waste

TRUE FALSE 300000 Permitted to burn up to 300,000 Gallons every 7 years No CAA Section 129 requirements are cost prohibitive. 1104 Ion exchange resin

TRUE FALSE 100 Permitted to burn 100 Gallons/Year No CAA Section 129 requirements are cost prohibitive. 1104 Oil/W ater separator sludge

TRUE FALSE 1000 Permitted to burn 1000 Gallons/Year No CAA Section 129 requirements are cost prohibitive. 1104 Oily

water TRUE FALSE 10000 Permitted to burn 10,000 Gallons/Year No CAA Section 129 requirements are cost prohibitive. 1104 Turbine cleaning waste

TRUE FALSE 8000 Permitted to burn up to 8000 Gallons every 7 years No CAA Section 129 requirements are cost prohibitive. 1104 Used Oil TRUE FALSE 6000 Permitted to burn 6000 Gallons/Year No CAA Section 129 requirements are cost prohibitive. 1104 Used oil adsorbents

TRUE FALSE 1000 Permitted to burn 1000 Gallons/Year No CAA Section 129 requirements are cost prohibitive. 1104 Water based parts washer

TRUE FALSE 10000 Permitted to burn 10,000 Gallons/Year No CAA Section 129 requirements are cost prohibitive.

Page 18facility _other_materials rcra_explain CAA Section 129 requirements are cost prohibitive. CAA Section 129 requirements are cost prohibitive. CAA Section 129 requirements are cost prohibitive. CAA Section 129 requirements are cost prohibitive. CAA Section 129 requirements are cost prohibitive. CAA Section 129 requirements are cost prohibitive. CAA Section 129 requirements are cost prohibitive. CAA Section 129 requirements are cost prohibitive.

Page 19boiler_information

facility _id boiler_id boiler_type boiler_other bottom_design

design_fuel heat_input max_heat_input MW e_capacity 1104 1 Tangential firing Dry Bottom coal 1892 2228 212.02

Page 20boiler_information

MW e_net_capacity

design_gross_efficiency

operating_gross_efficiency

design_pressure

operating_pressure

design_temp

operating_temp

design_reheat_multiple

design_reheat_temp1 197.37 87.67 83.66 1890 1795.04 1.11 1.12 FALSE 1.13

Page 21boiler_information

design_reheat_temp2

operating_reheat_multiple

operating_reheat_temp1

operating_reheat_temp2

hours_operated

vg_capacity

_factor applicable_NSPS

retirement_year

retirement_year_CBI FALSE 1.14 7753 69.71 N FALSE

Page 22boiler_information

NOx_control

SO2_control

combustion_additives Yes Yes Yes

Page 23boiler_fuels

facility _id boiler_id fuel_type fuel_year percentage_massvol percentage_btu

other_type 1104 1 coal - subbituminous 2007 99.89 1104 1 coal - subbituminous 2008 99.92 1104 1 coal - subbituminous 2009 99.93 1104 1 natural gas 2007 0.11 1104 1 natural gas 2008 0.08 1104 1 natural gas 2009 0.07

Page 24boiler_control_NOx

facility _id boiler_id NOx_type NOx_other NOx_online 1104 1 Low NOx Burner 11/1/1993 1104 1 Overfire Air 11/1/1993

Page 25boiler_control_SO2

facility _id boiler_id SO2_type SO2_other SO2_online 1104 1 Low Sulfur Coal 11/1/1993

Page 26boiler_additives

facility _id boiler_id boiler_additive additive_other

additive_online 1104 1 Flue gas conditioning to control opacity (e.g., SO3 injection, ammonia, other) 4/1/1996

Page 27facility _units facility _id unit_id 1104 1

Page 28unit_boilers

facility _id unit_id boiler_id 1104 1 1

Page 29facility _controls facility _id control_id control_group control_type

control_other

legacy _control cntrol_online

control_offline

NOx_reagent 1104 ESP 1 PM control Electrostatic precipitator, cold side, w/ flue gas conditioning FALSE 6/1/1968

Page 30facility _controls reagent_other

NOx_ammonia

SO2_sorbent

oher_sorbent

SO2_scrubber_additive

Page 31facility _sampling_ports facility _id sampling_port_id 1104 ESP Inlet 1 1104 Unit 1 Stack

Page 32facility _stacks facility _id stack_id stack_height stack_diameter

sack_gas_velocity 1104 Stack - 1 306 11.063

Page 33configurations

facility _id configuration_id 1104 Unit 1

Page 34configuration_components

facility _id configuration_id

component_id

order component_type port_near 1104 Unit 1 1 1 Unit 1104 Unit 1 ESP 1 3 PM control 1104 Unit 1 ESP Inlet 1 2 Sam pling Port next 1104 Unit 1 Stack - 1 5 Stack 1104 Unit 1 Unit 1 Stack 4 Sam pling Port next

Page 35configuration_pollutants1

facility _id configuration_id

pollutant_nam e

permit_type_1

em lim it_1 em lim it_units_1 avg_period_1

em lim it_2 em lim it_units_2 1104 Unit 1 PM (Filterable) State - State Operating Permit

0.8 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) 1104 Unit 1 PM10 (Filterable) State - State Operating Permit

0.559 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) 1161 pound per hour (lb/hr) 1104 Unit 1 Sulfur Dioxide (SO2) State - State Operating Permit

5.032 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu)

3 hours 9882 pound per hour (lb/hr) 1104 Unit 1 Nitrogen Oxide (NOx) State - State Operating Permit

0.44 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu)

30 days 885 pound per hour (lb/hr) 1104 Unit 1 Carbon Monoxide (CO) State - State Operating Permit

0.102 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu)

30 days 200.3 pound per hour (lb/hr)

Page 36configuration_pollutants1

avg_period_2

em lim it_details

test_method

em rate em rate_units guarantee_level

_explain

req_monitoring

eq_recordkeeping pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) Lim it 1 is a 3 run average - PM is Total PM = PM (Filterable) + PM Condensable No n/a n/a pound per hour (lb/hr) Lim its 1 & 2 are 3 run average - Limit 3 See Note # 1.05 No CAM Plan CAM Plan 3 hours Lim it 3 See Note # 1.06 No CEM 40 CFR 75. The owner or operator shall maintain a record of 3-hour rolling average in lbs/mmBtu of SO2 emissions. The owner or operator shall maintain a record of 3-hour rolling average in lbs/MMBtu of SO2 emissions. The owner or operator shall maintain a record of 12-month rolling totals in tons of NOx, SO2, and CO emissions pound per hour (lb/hr) Lim it 2 is a 3 run average - Limit 3 See Note # 1.07 No CEM 40 CFR Part 75. The owner or operator shall maintain a record of 30-day rolling average in lbs/MMBtu of NOx and CO emissions. The owner or operator shall maintain a record of 12-month rolling totals in tons of NOx, SO2, and CO emissions pound per hour (lb/hr) Lim it 2 is a 3 run average - Limit 3 See Note # 1.08 No The owner or operator shall maintain a record of 30-day rolling average in lbs/MMBtu of NOx and CO emissions. Stack Test completed before 7/30/2006 The owner or operator shall maintain a record of 12-month rolling totals in tons of NOx, SO2, and CO emissions

Page 37configuration_pollutants1

req_reporting n/a CAM Plan The owner or operator shall submit quarterly reports on opacity , SO2, NOx, CO2, and airflow to the Administrator and IDNR. For those items only required to be submitted to the Administrator regarding the Acid Rain requirements, do not send a duplicate copy of these items to IDNR. These reports shall conform to the requirements of 40 CFR Part 75. The owner or operator shall submit quarterly reports on opacity , SO2, NOx, CO2, and airflow to the Administrator and IDNR. For those items only required to be submitted to the Administrator regarding the Acid Rain requirements, do not send a duplicate copy of these items to IDNR. These reports shall conform to the requirements of 40 CFR Part 75. The owner or operator shall submit quarterly reports on opacity , SO2, NOx, CO2, and airflow to the Administrator and IDNR. For those items only required to be submitted to the Administrator regarding the Acid Rain requirements, do not send a duplicate copy of these items to IDNR. These reports shall conform to the requirements of 40 CFR Part 75.

Page 38configuration_pollutants1
The owner or operator shall submit quarterly reports on opacity , SO2, NOx, CO2, and airflow to the Administrator and IDNR. For those items only required to be submitted to the Administrator regarding the Acid Rain requirements, do not send a duplicate copy of these items to IDNR. These reports shall conform to the requirements of 40 CFR Part 75. The owner or operator shall submit quarterly reports on opacity , SO2, NOx, CO2, and airflow to the Administrator and IDNR. For those items only required to be submitted to the Administrator regarding the Acid Rain requirements, do not send a duplicate copy of these items to IDNR. These reports shall conform to the requirements of 40 CFR Part 75. The owner or operator shall submit quarterly reports on opacity , SO2, NOx, CO2, and airflow to the Administrator and IDNR. For those items only required to be submitted to the Administrator regarding the Acid Rain requirements, do not send a duplicate copy of these items to IDNR. These reports shall conform to the requirements of 40 CFR Part 75.

Page 39configuration_pollutants1
The owner or operator shall submit quarterly reports on opacity , SO2, NOx, CO2, and airflow to the Administrator and IDNR. For those items only required to be submitted to the Administrator regarding the Acid Rain requirements, do not send a duplicate copy of these items to IDNR. These reports shall conform to the requirements of 40 CFR Part 75. The owner or operator shall submit quarterly reports on opacity , SO2, NOx, CO2, and airflow to the Administrator and IDNR. For those items only required to be submitted to the Administrator regarding the Acid Rain requirements, do not send a duplicate copy of these items to IDNR. These reports shall conform to the requirements of 40 CFR Part 75. The owner or operator shall submit quarterly reports on opacity , SO2, NOx, CO2, and airflow to the Administrator and IDNR. For those items only required to be submitted to the Administrator regarding the Acid Rain requirements, do not send a duplicate copy of these items to IDNR. These reports shall conform to the requirements of 40 CFR Part 75.

Page 40configuration_pollutants1
The owner or operator shall submit quarterly reports on opacity, SO2, NOx, CO2, and airflow to the Administrator and IDNR. For those items only required to be submitted to the Administrator regarding the Acid Rain requirements, do not send a duplicate copy of these items to IDNR. These reports shall conform to the requirements of 40 CFR Part 75. The owner or operator shall submit quarterly reports on opacity, SO2, NOx, CO2, and airflow to the Administrator and IDNR. For those items only required to be submitted to the Administrator regarding the Acid Rain requirements, do not send a duplicate copy of these items to IDNR. These reports shall conform to the requirements of 40 CFR Part 75. The owner or operator shall submit quarterly reports on opacity, SO2, NOx, CO2, and airflow to the Administrator and IDNR. For those items only required to be submitted to the Administrator regarding the Acid Rain requirements, do not send a duplicate copy of these items to IDNR. These reports shall conform to the requirements of 40 CFR Part 75.

Page 41control_technologies

facility _id configuration_id

component_id

control_id project_title project_type vendor_name

vndor_contact

vendor_phone

Page 42control_technologies

vendor_address

vndor_city

vendor_state

vendor_zip actual_start_date projected_start_date

end_date sorbent chemical_additive

Page 43control_technologies

injection_point

HAP_em ission_reduction

HAP_em ission_rate

HAP_em ission_rate_units

HAP_achieved_reduction

HAP_achieved_rate

HAP_achieved_rate_units

feed_rate feed_rate_units

Page 44control_technologies feed_rate_units

Page 45control_coal_ranks

facility _id configuration_id

component_id

control_id coal_type

Page 46control_pollutants1

facility _id configuration_id

component_id

control_id pollutant_nam e

Page 47control_costs

facility _id configuration_id

component_id

control_id boiler_retrofit boiler_new_install

total_capital_investm ent

total_operating_costs

base_year

Page 48control_costs

CBI

Page 49mi sc_controls

facility _id mi sc_control_id

control_description

Page 50mi sc_control_configurations

facility _id mi sc_control_id

configuration_id

Page 51fuel_shipments

facility _id shipment_id

shipment_date

am ount_received

am ount_units

fuel_type state_country other_country

county 1104 200901-Coal 1/1/2009 59185.18 short tons (2000 lbs) coal WY WY - Campbell 1104 200902-Coal 2/1/2009 60491.15 short tons (2000 lbs) coal WY WY - Campbell 1104 200903-Coal 3/1/2009 71715.99 short tons (2000 lbs) coal WY WY - Campbell 1104 200904-Coal 4/1/2009 40959.47 short tons (2000 lbs) coal WY WY - Campbell 1104 200905-Coal 5/1/2009 10294.85 short tons (2000 lbs) coal WY WY - Campbell 1104 200906-Coal 6/1/2009 41224.15 short tons (2000 lbs) coal WY WY - Campbell 1104 200907-Coal 7/1/2009 31136.15 short tons (2000 lbs) coal WY WY - Campbell 1104 200908-Coal 8/1/2009 71734.53 short tons (2000 lbs) coal WY WY - Campbell 1104 200909-Coal 9/1/2009 31009.1 short tons (2000 lbs) coal WY WY - Campbell 1104 200910-Coal

10/1/2009 71448.63 short tons (2000 lbs) coal WY WY - Campbell 1104 200911-Coal

11/1/2009 30545.38 short tons (2000 lbs) coal WY WY - Campbell 1104 200912-Coal

12/1/2009 50011.19 short tons (2000 lbs) coal WY WY - Campbell

Page 52fuel_shipments

coal_seam shipment_method WY - Campbell Unit Train WY - Campbell Unit Train WY - Campbell Unit Train WY - Campbell Unit Train WY - Campbell Unit Train WY - Campbell Unit Train WY - Campbell Unit Train WY - Campbell Unit Train WY - Campbell Unit Train WY - Campbell Unit Train WY - Campbell Unit Train WY - Campbell Unit Train

Page 53fuel_shipment_configurations

facility _id shipment_id

configuration_id 1104 200901-Coal

Unit 1 1104 200902-Coal

Unit 1 1104 200903-Coal

Unit 1 1104 200904-Coal

Unit 1 1104 200905-Coal

Unit 1 1104 200906-Coal

Unit 1 1104 200907-Coal

Unit 1 1104 200908-Coal

Unit 1 1104 200909-Coal

Unit 1 1104 200910-Coal

Unit 1 1104 200911-Coal

Unit 1 1104 200912-Coal

Unit 1

Page 54fuel_shipment_samples

facility _id shipment_id

sample_id am ount_fuel am ount_fuel_units

total_sulfur ash_content heating_value

hating_units

Page 55fuel_shipment_samples

chlorine chlorine_units fluorine fluorine_units data_provided

data_other_specified

supplier_type

supplier_name

supplier_address

Page 56fuel_shipment_samples

supplier_city

supplier_state

supplier_zip

lab_nam e lab_address lab_city lab_state lab_zip analysis_copies

Page 57fuel_shipment_samples analysis_copies

Page 58fuel_sample_pollutants

facility _id shipment_id

sample_id fuel_pollutant pollutant_conc

pollutant_conc_units

pollutant_conc_ND

pollutant_conc_MDL

Page 59test_reports

facility _id report_id report_type other_type report_description report_begin_date

report_end_date

before_control

during_deviation 1104 BGS1-CO-20060516

compliance Carbon Monoxide testing at unit 1 stack 5/16/2006 5/16/2006 No No 1104 BGS1-Metals-Inlet-20060517

other Diagnostic Metals Testing at Unit 1 ESP Inlet of Unit 1 - this testing was run in conjuction with the Unit 1 Stack metals compliance testing on the same test date 5/17/2006 5/17/2006 No No 1104 BGS1-Metals-Stack-2006517

compliance Metals testing at Unit 1 Stack 5/17/2006 5/17/2006 No No 1104 BGS-Hg-20071010

other Diagnostic Diagnostic mercury testing at Unit 1 Stack ######## ######## No No

Page 60test_reports

deviation_reports No No No No

Page 61test_report_configurations

facility _id report_id configuration_id 1104 BGS1-CO-20060516

Unit 1 1104 BGS1-Metals-Inlet-20060517

Unit 1 1104 BGS1-Metals-Stack-2006517

Unit 1 1104 BGS-Hg-20071010

Unit 1

Page 62test_report_fuels

facility _id report_id fuel_id 1104 BGS1-CO-20060516

Subbitum inous 1104 BGS1-Metals-Inlet-20060517

Subbitum inous 1104 BGS1-Metals-Stack-2006517

Subbitum inous 1104 BGS-Hg-20071010

Subbitum inous

Page 63test_report_fuel_types

facility _id report_id fuel_id fuel_type percentage_massvol percentage_btu

other_type 1104 BGS1-CO-20060516

Subbitum inous

coal - subbituminous

100 100 1104 BGS1-Metals-Inlet-20060517

Subbitum inous

coal - subbituminous

100 100 1104 BGS1-Metals-Stack-2006517

Subbitum inous

coal - subbituminous

100 100 1104 BGS-Hg-20071010

Subbitum inous

coal - subbituminous

100 100

Page 64cem_data

facility _id tim e_period

cem_period_description 1104 01/01/2009 - 12/31/2009

Start date of time period for which Hg CEMs data is available reflects post-installation and QA/QC of the Tekran continuous mercury emission monitor systems for Burlington unit 1. See NOTES page for additional information.

Page 65cem_data Start date of time period for which Hg CEMs data is available reflects post-installation and QA/QC of the Tekran continuous mercury emission monitor systems for Burlington unit 1. See NOTES page for additional information.

Page 66cem_data Start date of time period for which Hg CEMs data is available reflects post-installation and QA/QC of the Tekran continuous mercury emission monitor systems for Burlington unit 1. See NOTES page for additional information.

Page 67cem_data_pollutants1

facility _id tim e_period

pollutant_nam e 1104 01/01/2009 - 12/31/2009

Total Mercury

(Hgt)

Page 68test_report_sampling

facility _id report_id sampling_port_id point_differ point_description befre_SO2_device

point_orientation

normal_bypass_percent

testing_bypass_percent 1104 BGS1-CO-20060516

Unit 1 Stack

No No 1104 BGS1-Metals-Inlet-20060517

ESP Inlet 1 No No 1104 BGS1-Metals-Stack-2006517

Unit 1 Stack

No No 1104 BGS-Hg-20071010

Unit 1 Stack

No No

Page 69test_report_sampling

fg_fraction

Page 70sampling_runs

facility _id report_id sampling_port_id run_id start_datetime end_datetim e

unit_load net_generation fg_moisture_content 1104 BGS1-CO-20060516

Unit 1 Stack

average 5/16/2006 5/16/2006 200 9.7 1104 BGS1-Metals-Inlet-20060517

ESP Inlet 1 average 5/17/2006 5/17/2006 200 10.6 1104 BGS1-Metals-Stack-2006517

Unit 1 Stack

average 5/17/2006 5/17/2006 200 11.9 1104 BGS-Hg-20071010

Unit 1 Stack

average ######## ######## 195 10.9

Page 71sampling_runs

fg_flow_rate

fg_flow_rate_units

standard_temperature

standard_pressure

normal_temperature

normal_pressure

fg_oxygen_content

fg_CO2_content

fg_temperature 474511 dscfm 68 1 4.5 15 1.01 469619 dscfm 68 1 4 15 1.04 464120 dscfm 68 1 4.5 15 1.03 476406 dscfm 68 1 5 14.3 1.02

Page 72sampling_runs

fg_pressure

Hg_loi test_method run_comments

fuel_id fuel_unit_load fuel_flow_rate

fuel_ash fuel_heating_value 0.98 10 0.95 2929 Subbitum inous 200 239170 5.82 11901 0.98 29 Subbitum inous 200 239170 5.82 11901 0.98 ASTM D6784-02 Subbitum inous 195 6.67 11910

Page 73sampling_runs

fuel_sulfur 0.35 0.35 0.27

Page 74sampling_run_pollutants1

facility _id report_id sampling_port_id run_id pollutant_nam e conc conc_units conc_ND conc_MDL 1104 BGS1-CO-20060516

Unit 1 Stack

average Carbon Monoxide (CO) 15.4 parts per million by volum e (dry) (ppmvd) FALSE 1104 BGS-Hg-20071010

Unit 1 Stack

average Total Mercury (Hgt) 4.5094 mi crogram per dry standard cubic meter ( FALSE 1104 BGS-Hg-20071010

Unit 1 Stack

average Elem ental Mercury (Hg0) 4.473 mi crogram per dry standard cubic meter ( FALSE 1104 BGS-Hg-20071010

Unit 1 Stack

average Oxidized Mercury (Hg++) 0.02765 mi crogram per dry standard cubic meter ( FALSE 1104 BGS-Hg-20071010

Unit 1 Stack

average Particulate-bound Mercury (Hgp) 0.0089 mi crogram per dry standard cubic meter ( FALSE 1104 BGS1-Metals-Stack-2006517

Unit 1 Stack

average Arsenic (As) 16.158 mi crogram per normal cubic meter ( FALSE 1104 BGS1-Metals-Stack-2006517

Unit 1 Stack

average Beryllium (Be) 0.678 mi crogram per normal cubic meter ( FALSE 1104 BGS1-Metals-Stack-2006517

Unit 1 Stack

average Cadmium (Cd) 0.929 mi crogram per normal cubic meter ( FALSE 1104 BGS1-Metals-Stack-2006517

Unit 1 Stack

average Chromium (Cr) 15.774 mi crogram per normal cubic meter ( FALSE 1104 BGS1-Metals-Stack-2006517

Unit 1 Stack

average Lead (Pb) 4.779 mi crogram per normal cubic meter ( FALSE 1104 BGS1-Metals-Stack-2006517

Unit 1 Stack

average Manganese (Mn) 18.466 mi crogram per normal cubic meter (

FALSE 1104 BGS1-Metals-Stack-2006517

Unit 1 Stack

average Total Mercury (Hgt) 11.486 mi crogram per normal cubic meter (

FALSE 1104 BGS1-Metals-Stack-2006517

Unit 1 Stack

average Nickel (Ni) 21.486 mi crogram per normal cubic meter ( FALSE 1104 BGS1-Metals-Stack-2006517

Unit 1 Stack

average Selenium (Se) 7.186 mi crogram per normal cubic meter ( FALSE 1104 BGS1-Metals-Inlet-20060517

ESP Inlet 1 average Arsenic (As) 375.309 mi crogram per normal cubic meter ( FALSE 1104 BGS1-Metals-Inlet-20060517

ESP Inlet 1 average Beryllium (Be) 29.1 mi crogram per normal cubic meter ( FALSE 1104 BGS1-Metals-Inlet-20060517

ESP Inlet 1 average Cadmium (Cd) 23.262 mi crogram per normal cubic meter ( FALSE 1104 BGS1-Metals-Inlet-20060517

ESP Inlet 1 average Chromium (Cr) 309.315 mi crogram per normal cubic meter (

FALSE 1104 BGS1-Metals-Inlet-20060517

ESP Inlet 1 average Lead (Pb) 262.192 mi crogram per normal cubic meter ( FALSE 1104 BGS1-Metals-Inlet-20060517

ESP Inlet 1 average Manganese (Mn) 1359.371 mi crogram per normal cubic meter ( FALSE 1104 BGS1-Metals-Inlet-20060517

ESP Inlet 1 average Total Mercury (Hgt) 12.941 mi crogram per normal cubic meter (

FALSE 1104 BGS1-Metals-Inlet-20060517

ESP Inlet 1 average Nickel (Ni) 599.106 mi crogram per normal cubic meter ( FALSE 1104 BGS1-Metals-Inlet-20060517

ESP Inlet 1 average Selenium (Se) 321.642 mi crogram per normal cubic meter (

FALSE

Page 75sampling_run_pollutants1

em ission_rate

em ission_rate_units

em ission_rate_ND

em ission_rate_MDL

em ission_factor

em ission_factor_units

em ission_factor_ND

em ission_factor_MDL

run_pollutant_comment 32 pound per hour (lb/hr)

FALSE FALSE 0.0081 pound per hour (lb/hr)

FALSE 0.003619 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) FALSE 0.008 pound per hour (lb/hr)

FALSE 0.00359 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) FALSE 0.000049 pound per hour (lb/hr) FALSE 2.22E-05 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) FALSE 0.000016 pound per hour (lb/hr) FALSE 7.15E-06 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) FALSE 0.0281 pound per hour (lb/hr)

FALSE 1.28E-05 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) FALSE 0.00118 pound per hour (lb/hr)

FALSE 5.35E-07 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) FALSE 0.00161 pound per hour (lb/hr)

FALSE 7.34E-07 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) FALSE 0.0275 pound per hour (lb/hr)

FALSE 1.25E-05 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) FALSE 0.00831 pound per hour (lb/hr)

FALSE 3.78E-06 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) FALSE 0.0321 pound per hour (lb/hr)

FALSE 1.46E-05 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) FALSE 0.02 pound per hour (lb/hr)

FALSE 9.08E-06 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) FALSE 0.0374 pound per hour (lb/hr)

FALSE 0.000017 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) FALSE 0.0125 pound per hour (lb/hr)

FALSE 5.68E-06 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) FALSE 0.657 pound per hour (lb/hr)

FALSE 0.000288 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) FALSE 0.0509 pound per hour (lb/hr)

FALSE 2.23E-05 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) FALSE 0.0407 pound per hour (lb/hr)

FALSE 1.78E-05 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) FALSE 0.541 pound per hour (lb/hr)

FALSE 0.000237 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) FALSE 0.458 pound per hour (lb/hr)

FALSE 0.000201 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) FALSE 2.38 pound per hour (lb/hr)

FALSE 0.00104 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) FALSE 0.0227 pound per hour (lb/hr)

FALSE 9.92E-06 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) FALSE 1.05 pound per hour (lb/hr)

FALSE 0.000459 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) FALSE 0.562 pound per hour (lb/hr)

FALSE 0.000247 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) FALSE

Page 76sampling_run_pollutants1 run_pollutant_comment

Page 77sampling_run_fuel

facility _id report_id sampling_port_id run_id fuel_pollutant fuel_conc fuel_conc_units fuel_conc_ND

fuel_conc_MDL 1104 BGS1-Metals-Inlet-20060517

ESP Inlet 1 average Antim ony (Sb) 0 mi crogram per gram (dry) (mg/g) FALSE 1104 BGS1-Metals-Inlet-20060517

ESP Inlet 1 average Arsenic (As) 7 mi crogram per gram (dry) (mg/g) FALSE 1104 BGS1-Metals-Inlet-20060517

ESP Inlet 1 average Beryllium (Be) 0 mi crogram per gram (dry) (mg/g) FALSE 1104 BGS1-Metals-Inlet-20060517

ESP Inlet 1 average Cadmium (Cd) 0 mi crogram per gram (dry) (mg/g) FALSE 1104 BGS1-Metals-Inlet-20060517

ESP Inlet 1 average Chromium (Cr) 4 mi crogram per gram (dry) (mg/g) FALSE 1104 BGS1-Metals-Inlet-20060517

ESP Inlet 1 average Lead (Pb) 3 mi crogram per gram (dry) (mg/g) FALSE 1104 BGS1-Metals-Inlet-20060517

ESP Inlet 1 average Manganese (Mn) 12 mi crogram per gram (dry) (mg/g) FALSE 1104 BGS1-Metals-Inlet-20060517

ESP Inlet 1 average Mercury (Hg) 0.08 mi crogram per gram (dry) (mg/g) FALSE 1104 BGS1-Metals-Inlet-20060517

ESP Inlet 1 average Nickel (Ni) 0 mi crogram per gram (dry) (mg/g) FALSE 1104 BGS1-Metals-Inlet-20060517

ESP Inlet 1 average Selenium (Se) 0 mi crogram per gram (dry) (mg/g) FALSE 1104 BGS1-Metals-Stack-2006517

Unit 1 Stack

average Antim ony

(Sb) 0 mi crogram per gram (dry) (mg/g) FALSE 1104 BGS1-Metals-Stack-2006517

Unit 1 Stack

average Arsenic (As) 7 mi crogram per gram (dry) (mg/g) FALSE 1104 BGS1-Metals-Stack-2006517

Unit 1 Stack

average Beryllium (Be) 0 mi crogram per gram (dry) (mg/g) FALSE 1104 BGS1-Metals-Stack-2006517

Unit 1 Stack

average Cadmium (Cd) 0 mi crogram per gram (dry) (mg/g) FALSE 1104 BGS1-Metals-Stack-2006517

Unit 1 Stack

average Chromium (Cr) 4 mi crogram per gram (dry) (mg/g) FALSE 1104 BGS1-Metals-Stack-2006517

Unit 1 Stack

average Lead (Pb) 3 mi crogram per gram (dry) (mg/g) FALSE 1104 BGS1-Metals-Stack-2006517

Unit 1 Stack

average Manganese (Mn) 12 mi crogram per gram (dry) (mg/g) FALSE 1104 BGS1-Metals-Stack-2006517

Unit 1 Stack

average Mercury

(Hg) 0.08 mi crogram per gram (dry) (mg/g) FALSE 1104 BGS1-Metals-Stack-2006517

Unit 1 Stack

average Nickel (Ni) 0 mi crogram per gram (dry) (mg/g) FALSE 1104 BGS1-Metals-Stack-2006517

Unit 1 Stack

average Selenium (Se) 0 mi crogram per gram (dry) (mg/g) FALSE 1104 BGS-Hg-20071010

Unit 1 Stack

average Mercury

(Hg) 0.07 mi crogram per gram (dry) (mg/g) FALSE

Page 78sampling_run_fuel fuel_conc_MDL

Page 79