alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 10.19 Non-employee director compensation 12.31.13






Exhibit 10.19


Non-Employee Director Compensation


We currently pay our non-employee directors an annual retainer of $40,000.  Our lead director and each Chairperson of a Committee of the Board of Directors also receives an annual retainer.  The compensation per meeting and annual chairperson retainer amounts as of January 1, 2014 are as follows:


	
																
	 
	Board of Directors
	Special Committee
	Audit Committee
	Compensation Committee
	Nominating Committee

	Meeting daily compensation - attendance in person
	$
	1,000
	

	$
	500
	

	$
	500
	

	$
	500
	

	$
	500
	


	Meeting daily compensation - telephonic
	$
	500
	

	$
	500
	

	$
	500
	

	$
	500
	

	$
	500
	


	Annual Retainer - Chairperson
	$
	25,000
	

	not applicable
	

	$
	18,500
	

	$
	7,500
	

	$
	5,000
	







As of January 1, 2014, the equity component of the director's compensation is valued at $150,000.  Half of the annual equity package consists of  restricted stock units and the other half consists of  stock options.   The options become exercisable one year after the grant date and expire ten years after the grant date.  The restricted stock units vest one year from the grant date.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                           6,361
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   24,412
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,058
<INVENTORY>                                     16,683
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                56,032
<PP&E>                                          17,114
<DEPRECIATION>                                   6,143
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  68,146
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           14,247
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            88
<OTHER-SE>                                      51,703
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    68,146
<SALES>                                        126,322
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               126,322
<CGS>                                           42,061
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   55,033
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   384
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 175
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 29,732
<INCOME-TAX>                                    11,380
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             18,352
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    18,352
<EPS-BASIC>                                       1.42
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.34


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32





DIGIPATH, INC.





CERTIFICATION


PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


(SUBSECTIONS (a) AND (b) OF SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18,


UNITED STATES CODE)








Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), the undersigned officer of DigiPath, Inc. (the “Company”), does hereby certify with respect to the Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), to the best of the undersigned’s knowledge that:





(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of  1934; and





(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








May 11, 2011/s/ ERIC STOPPENHAGENEric Stoppenhagen

Principal Executive Officer

Principal Financial Officer
Consent of Independent Certified Public Accountants

Consent of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

March 30, 2000

We consent to the  incorporation by reference in the registration  statements of
Modis Professional Services,  Inc. on Form S-3 (Reg. Nos. 333-17715,  333-18695,
333-49505  and  333-67271)  and on Form  S-8  (Reg.  Nos.  33-99262,  333-06899,
333-15701,  333-16043,  333-30455,  333-41305,  333-49495, 333-49493, 333-58261,
333-69915,  333-79001,  333-79001  and  333-88329) of our report dated March 30,
2000,  on  our  audits  of  the  consolidated   financial  statements  of  Modis
Professional  Services,  Inc. as of December 31, 1999 and 1998,  and for each of
the three years in the period ended December 31, 1999,  which report is included
in the Company's filing on Form 10-K/A.


PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Jacksonville, Florida
Dolan Chemical Laboratory 4001 Bixby Road Groveport, OH 43125 T: 614-836-4221, Audinet 210-4221 F: 614-836-4168, Audinet 210-4168 http://aepenv/labs 

### Water Analysis Form REP-703 Rev. 1, 11/2013



### Location: Amos Plant Report Date: 10/1/2014 Sample Number: 143296-001 Date Collected:09/16/2014 08:31 Date Received:9/16/2014 

### WWTP Inlet Units Parameter Result RL Analysis By Analysis Date/Time Method MDL Data Qual ng/L Mercury, Hg 653000 10000 JAB EPA 1631E-2002 4000 09/23/2014 

### Sample Number: 143296-002 Date Collected:09/16/2014 08:26 Date Received:9/16/2014 

### Primary Clarifier Outlet A Units Parameter Result RL Analysis By Analysis Date/Time Method MDL Data Qual ng/L Mercury, Hg 179 20 JAB EPA 1631E-2002 8 09/23/2014 

### Sample Number: 143296-003 Date Collected:09/16/2014 08:24 Date Received:9/16/2014 

### Primary Clarifier Outlet B Units Parameter Result RL Analysis By Analysis Date/Time Method MDL Data Qual ng/L Mercury, Hg 153 20 JAB EPA 1631E-2002 8 09/23/2014 

### Sample Number: 143296-004 Date Collected:09/16/2014 08:12 Date Received:9/16/2014 

### Secondary Clarifier Outlet A Units Parameter Result RL Analysis By Analysis Date/Time Method MDL Data Qual ng/L Mercury, Hg 3.5 2 JAB EPA 1631E-2002 0.8 09/26/2014 

### Sample Number: 143296-005 Date Collected:09/16/2014 08:15 Date Received:9/16/2014 

### Secondary Clarifier Outlet B Units Parameter Result RL Analysis By Analysis Date/Time Method MDL Data Qual ng/L Mercury, Hg 3.2 2 JAB EPA 1631E-2002 0.8 09/26/2014 

### Sample Number: 143296-006 Date Collected:09/16/2014 08:20 Date Received:9/16/2014 

### WWTP Outlet Units Parameter Result RL Analysis By Analysis Date/Time Method MDL Data Qual ng/L Mercury, Hg 3.1 1 JAB EPA 1631E-2002 0.4 09/26/2014

Amos Plant, 143296 Page 1 of 2

### Location: Amos Plant Report Date: 10/1/2014

THIS TEST REPORT RELATES ONLY TO THE ITEMS TESTED AND SHALL NOT BE REPRODUCED EXCEPT IN FULL WITHOUT WRITTEN APPROVAL OF THE LABORATORY. ALL TEST RESULTS MEET ALL OF THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE ACCREDITING AUTHORITY, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. U: Analyte was analyzed and not detected at or above adjusted Method Detection Limit J: Analyte was positively identified, though the quantitation was below Reporting Limit. Dave Conover, Senior Chemist Email dpconover@aep.com Tel. 614-836-4219 Fax 614-836-4168 Audinet 210-4219

Amos Plant, 143296 Page 2 of 2
|   | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Signatures       |   | Title                                                |   | Date               |
|------------------|--------|------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------------------|
|             |   |                                                 |   |               |
| /s/ Victor Chang |   | President, Chief Financial Officer and Secretary     |   | September 20, 2011 |
| Victor Chang     |   | (Principal executive officer and principal financial |   |               |
|             |   | officer)                                             |   |               |

----
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

July 8, 2004

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 03-50988

Summary Calendar

 

EARLEEN PINE; ET AL.,

Plaintiffs

EARLEEN PINE; HOYLE S. KRUSE; DONALD B. DULIN; 

PATRICIA A. DULIN; MARY V. RENTON; TENA J. SHEPHERD; 

MICHAEL L. SHEPARD; JACK FITTS; JAN FITTS,

Plaintiffs-Appellants

versus

CITY OF MIDLAND, also known as City of Midland, Texas;

RICK MENCHACA; GARY SAUNDERS,

Defendants-Appellees.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. MO-02-CV-112

--------------------

Before BARKSDALE, EMILIO M. GARZA, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The appellants-property owners appeal from the summary

judgment dismissal of their 42 U.S.C. § 1983 claims as barred

by the statute of limitations. Applying the same test as the
No. 03-50988

-2-

district court, we affirm. See Deas v. River West, L.P.,

152 F.3d 471, 475 (5th Cir. 1998).

We hold that the district court did not err in its

determination that equitable tolling did not apply in the instant

case and, therefore, that the § 1983 claims were barred by

Texas’s two-year limitations period for personal injury actions. 

See Owens v. Okure, 488 U.S. 235, 249-50 (1989); Henson-El v.

Rogers, 923 F.2d 51, 52 (5th Cir. 1991). We do not consider

the appellants arguments raised for the first time on appeal

that (1) application of the two-year limitations period is

unconstitutional as applied to their Fifth Amendment takings

claims and (2) fairness mandates the application of the equitable

doctrine of laches. See Leverette v. Louisville Ladder Co.,

183 F.3d 339, 342 (5th Cir. 1999).

AFFIRMED.
EXHIBIT 32


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, the
undersigned officer of the Sherwood Acquisition Corporation
(the "Company"), hereby certify to my knowledge that:

The Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30,
2010 of the Company fully complies, in all material respects,
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained in the
Report fairly represents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by
the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.


                             /s/ James M. Cassidy
                                 President, Director,
                                 Chief Executivie Officer,
                                 Chief Financial Officer and
                                 Principal Accounting Officer
Date: January 25, 2011
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Denali Commission","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.denali.gov","author_name":"denaliadmin","author_url":"https:\/\/www.denali.gov\/author\/denaliadmin\/","title":"City of False Pass Harbor House Construction Report","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"tNliw8ex6h\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.denali.gov\/city-of-false-pass-harbor-house-construction-report\/\">City of False Pass Harbor House Construction Report<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.denali.gov\/city-of-false-pass-harbor-house-construction-report\/embed\/#?secret=tNliw8ex6h\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“City of False Pass Harbor House Construction Report” — Denali Commission\" data-secret=\"tNliw8ex6h\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.denali.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/09\/cropped-low-res-from-web-150x150-1.png","thumbnail_width":150,"thumbnail_height":150}
302 CERTIFICATION  I, Robert Stevens, certify that:  1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Preventia, Inc.;  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;  4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:  a.  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures, to be designed under my supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to me by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;  b.  Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under my supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;  c.  Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report my conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  d.  Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and  5. I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):  a.  All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and  b.  any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.  Date: August 20, 2012  /s/Robert Stevens Robert Stevens CEO, Principal Financial Officer, Controller and Director
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4122 Received in Senate (RDS)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4122

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

             March 24 (legislative day, February 22), 1994

    Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, 
                      Science, and Transportation

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
     To temporarily extend certain provisions of the Marine Mammal 
                            Protection Act.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled, That section 114(a)(1) 
of the Marine Mammal Protection Act of 1972 (16 U.S.C. 1383a(a)(1)), is 
amended by striking ``April 1, 1994,'' and inserting in lieu thereof 
``May 1, 1994,''.

            Passed the House of Representatives March 24, 1994.

            Attest:

                                           DONNALD K. ANDERSON,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
`[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3676 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

<DOC>

        H.R.3676

                       One Hundred Third Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America


                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

          Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,
 the twenty-fifth day of January, one thousand nine hundred and ninety-
                                  four


                                 An Act

  
 
  To amend the District of Columbia Spouse Equity Act of 1988 to provide 
for


  coverage of the former spouses of judges of the District of Columbia 
                                 courts.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. COVERAGE OF FORMER SPOUSES OF JUDGES OF DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA 
COURTS UNDER SPOUSE EQUITY ACT.
    (a) In General.--Section 2 of the District of Columbia Spouse 
Equity Act of 1988 (sec. 1-3001, D.C. Code) is amended by striking 
``(A) and (C)''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) shall 
take effect as if included in the enactment of the District of Columbia 
Spouse Equity Act of 1988.







                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.







                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.`
EXHIBIT
32.1

CERTIFICATION
OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL

OFFICER
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the Report of Northam Acquisition Corp. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended
September 30, 2013 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, William
Tay, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:



|(1) | The Report
    fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information
    contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
    Company.
|--- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



By:
/s/ William Tay

William
Tay, President, Secretary and

Principal
Financial Officer

Dated:
November 12, 2013
FILED

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

JAN 23, 2008

THOMAS K. KAHN

CLERK

Honorable K. Michael Moore, U.S. District Judge for the Southern District of Florida, *

sitting by designation.

[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________

No. 07-11929

________________________

D. C. Docket No. 05-01121-CV-TCB-1

BETTYE FANNING, 

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

versus 

BOSTON MARKET CORPORATION, 

Defendant-Appellee. 

________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Georgia

_________________________

(January 23, 2008)

Before HULL and PRYOR, Circuit Judges, and MOORE, District Judge. *

PER CURIAM:
2

After review and oral argument, the Court concludes that Plaintiff-Appellant

Bettye Fanning has not shown any reversible error in the district court’s March 26,

2007 order adopting the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation of

February 26, 2007. Thus, the Court affirms the March 26, 2007 order granting

summary judgment in favor of Defendant-Appellee Boston Market Corporation as

to Fanning’s federal claims and dismissing her state-law claims without prejudice.

AFFIRMED.