alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### UNIQUE CATERERS, INC., a Florida corporation, d/b/a Tasty Box Lunch, Appellant, v. Anthony POLLIFRONE, Appellee.

No. 73-379.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

June 19, 1973.

Heller & Kaplan, for appellant.

Herbert Selder, for appellee.

Before BARKDULL, C. J., and PEARSON and HAVERFIELD, JJ.

PEARSON, Judge.

The appellee as plaintiff brought an action in the trial court in which he alleged that he had advanced money to the appellant corporation in order to assure the continuation of its business. He prayed for relief by way of a judgment against the corporation, and, in addition, prayed for an injunction as follows:

> 

> “That the Defendant corporation be temporarily and permanently enjoined *346from soliciting, diverting or attempting to take out of this jurisdiction any of the assets of the Defendant corporation.”

> * * * **** #

The trial court denied the temporary injunction; it did, however, enter an order as follows:

> * * * * * *

> “2. That if defendant shall sell or convey a major or material portion of its assets, it shall give no less than five days notice thereof to counsel for plaintiff prior to the date of such conveyance or sale.”

> * * * * * *

On this interlocutory appeal, the appellant corporation contends that the trial court was without authority to issue the type of order entered. We think that it is unnecessary to determine the authority of the trial court in this circumstance. The court was obviously attempting to protect the plaintiff bjr granting him some assurance that the corporation would not lose its assets before he could get a judgment. Nevertheless, we hold that the order is so vague and indefinite as to the actions which the corporation may take, the actions which it may not take without giving notice, the type of notice to be given, and the appellee’s rights if a notice is given, that it must be reversed. See Florio v. State ex rel. Epperson, Fla.App.1960, 119 So.2d 305.

Reversed.

BARKDULL, Chief Judge

(concurring in part, dissenting in part).

I concur in the above opinion authored by Judge Pearson, but I would also reverse because I find no authority for the chancellor to enter the type of order entered in the instant case upon the record presented to him. If he desires to enjoin or limit the activities of the appellant corporation, he should enter an order which would require the appellee to post a bond indemnifying the appellant from any damage sustained in the event the order was reversed or set aside.
EXHIBIT 21

<PAGE>


                                   EXHIBIT 21

                         SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT

Parent
------
FSF Financial Corp.


                                      Percentage           State of
Subsidiaries                            Owned            Incorporation
------------                          ----------         ------------- 
First Federal fsb (a)                    100%            United States
Insurance Planners (b)                   100%            Minnesota

---------------

(a)  Because FSF Financial  Corporation  neither  completed  its initial  public
     offering nor conducted any operations prior to the year ended September 30,
     1994, the operations of First Federal fsb are included in the  consolidated
     financial  statements  contained in the 1994 Annual Report to  Stockholders
     incorporated  herein by reference.  First Federal fsb became a wholly owned
     subsidiary of FSF Financial Corp. on October 6, 1994.

(b)  Insurance  Planners became a wholly owned subsidiary of FSF Financial Corp.
     on June 1, 1998.

                                       24
I

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 3904

To provide that certain service or management contracts will not result

in municipal water or wastewater facilities being treated as used in

a private business use for purposes of the limitations on private activity

bonds.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

FEBRUARY 24, 1994

Mr. JEFFERSON introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Ways and Means

A BILL

To provide that certain service or management contracts

will not result in municipal water or wastewater facilities

being treated as used in a private business use for purposes of the limitations on private activity bonds.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. TREATMENT OF CERTAIN SERVICE OR MAN4 AGEMENT CONTRACTS.

5 (a) GENERAL RULE.—The provisions of services

6 under a service or management contract shall not result

7 in any municipal water or wastewater facility being treated

8 as used in a private business use for purposes of section
2

•HR 3904 IH

1 141 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 if the require2 ments of section 5 of Revenue Procedure 93–19 are satis3 fied, except that, for purposes of this subsection, such

4 Revenue Procedure shall be applied—

5 (1) by substituting ‘‘fifteen’’ for ‘‘five’’ in sec6 tion 5.03, and

7 (2) as if it did not contain section 5.04.

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The provisions of subsection

9 (a) shall take effect on the date of the enactment of this

10 Act.

Æ
VIII

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 3344

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

OCTOBER 7 (legislative day, SEPTEMBER 12), 1994

Received

OCTOBER 8 (legislative day, SEPTEMBER 12), 1994

Read twice and referred to the Committee on Armed Services

AN ACT

For the relief of Lloyd B. Gamble.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. APPROPRIATION OF FUNDS.

4 (a) PAYMENT.—The Secretary of the Treasury shall

5 pay, out of any money in the Treasury not otherwise ap6 propriated, to Lloyd B. Gamble of Fairfax, Virginia, the

7 sum of $253,488.

8 (b) BASIS.—The payment required by subsection (a)

9 shall be to compensate Lloyd B. Gamble for the injuries

10 sustained by him as a result of the administration to him,

11 without his knowledge, of lysergic acid diethylamide by

12 United States Army personnel in 1957.
2

HR 3344 RFS

1 SEC. 2. SATISFACTION OF CLAIMS.

2 The payment made pursuant to section 1 shall be in

3 full satisfaction of all claims Lloyd B. Gamble may have

4 against the United States for any injury described in such

5 section.

6 SEC. 3. INELIGIBILITY FOR ADDITIONAL BENEFITS.

7 Upon payment of the sum referred to in section 1,

8 Lloyd B. Gamble shall not be eligible for any compensa9 tion or benefits from the Department of Veterans Affairs

10 or the Department of Defense for any injury described in

11 such section.

12 SEC. 4. LIMITATION OF AGENTS AND ATTORNEYS FEES.

13 It shall be unlawful for an amount of more than 10

14 percent of the amount paid pursuant to section 1 to be

15 paid to or received by any agent or attorney for any service

16 rendered to Lloyd B. Gamble in connection with the bene17 fits provided by this Act. Any person who violates this sec18 tion shall be guilty of an infraction and shall be subject

19 to a fine in the amount provided in title 18, United States

20 Code.

Passed the House of Representatives October 7,

1994.

Attest: DONNALD K. ANDERSON,

Clerk.
<PAGE>


                                                                   EXHIBIT 23.1

                  CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form
S-8) of our report dated January 21, 2000, with respect to the consolidated
financial statements and financial statement schedule of Commerce One, Inc.
included in its Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 1999,
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

                                                         /s/  ERNST & YOUNG LLP

Walnut Creek, California
September 19, 2000
Order entered February 28, 2013

In The 

## Court of Appeals **Fifth District of Texas at Dallas**
No. 05
- 12
- 01447
- CR
DENNIS EDWARD WILLIA MS, Appellant
V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 7 Dallas County, Texas Tr ial Court Cause No. F08
- 35085
- Y 

### O RDER
The Court ORDERS the trial court to conduct a hearing to determine why appellant’s brief has not been filed. In this regard, the trial court shall make appropriate findings and recommendations and determine whethe r appellant desires to prosecute the appeal, whether appellant is indigent, or if not indigent, whether retained counsel has abandoned the appeal. See
T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 38.8( b ). If the trial court cannot obtain appellant’s presence at the hearing, the tria l court shall conduct the hearing in appellant’s absence. See Meza v. State , 742 S.W.2d 708 (Tex. App.

– Corpus Christi 1987, no pet.) (per curiam). If appellant is indigent, the trial court is ORDERED to take such measures as may be necessary to assure ef fective representation, which may include appointment of new counsel.We ORDER the trial court to transmit a record of the proceedings, which shall include written findings and recommendations, to this Court within THIRTY DAYS of the date of this order. This appeal is ABATED to allow the trial court to comply with the above order. The appeal shall be reinstated thirty days from the date of this order or when the findings are received, whichever is earlier.

/s/ DAVID EVANS JUSTICE
EX-10.14.2



 Exhibit 10.14.2 

SECOND AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT 

This Second Amendment (“Amendment”) to the Employment Agreement (as defined below) is made and entered into as of
February 13, 2014 (the “Effective Date”), by and between RetailMeNot, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), and Louis Agnese, an individual (the “Executive”).

 WHEREAS, the Company (then operating as WhaleShark Media, Inc.) and Executive previously entered into an Employment Agreement effective
as of March 1, 2013, as amended by that certain Amendment to Employment Agreement dated October 15, 2013 (the “Employment Agreement”); and 

WHEREAS, the Company and Executive wish to amend the Employment Agreement in the manner set forth herein, pursuant to Executive’s
request. 
 NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of their mutual promises and agreements contained in the Employment Agreement and other good and
valuable consideration, the Company and Executive agree as follows: 
  

	 	1.	Section 1.6.1 of the Employment Agreement shall be amended and restated to read in its entirety to read as follows: 


“1.6.1. Voluntary Termination, Termination for Cause, Termination for Death or Disability. In the case of a termination of
Executive’s employment hereunder for Death or Disability in accordance with Section 1.5.1 above, Executive’s Voluntary termination of employment hereunder in accordance with Section 1.5.2 above, or a termination of
Executive’s employment hereunder for Cause in accordance with Section 1.5.3 above, (i) Executive shall not be entitled to receive payment of, and the Company shall have no obligation to pay, any severance or similar
compensation attributable to such termination, other than Base Salary earned but unpaid, vested benefits under any employee benefit plan, and any unreimbursed expenses pursuant to Section 1.4.3 hereof incurred by Executive as of the
Termination Date, and (ii) the Company’s other obligations under this Agreement shall immediately cease.” 
  

	 	2.	Except as specifically amended, the Employment Agreement shall remain in full force and effect as originally executed. 

  

	 	3.	This Amendment may be signed in counterparts, each of which shall be an original, with the same effect as if the signatures were upon the same instruments. 


  
 1 








 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Amendment is hereby executed to be effective as of the date set forth
above. 
  

			
	“COMPANY”
	
	RETAILMENOT, INC.
		
	By:	 	/s/ G. Cotter Cunningham
	Name:	 	G. Cotter Cunningham
	Title:	 	President and Chief Executive Officer
	
	“EXECUTIVE”
	
	LOUIS AGNESE
	
	/s/ Louis Agnese
	By: Louis Agnese



  
 2
Exhibit 32.2
 
 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
 PURSUANT TO
 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 
 I, Doron Uziel, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the quarterly report of Progaming Platforms Corp. on Form 10-Q for the three months ended March 31, 2011 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such quarterly report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of Progaming Platforms Corp. as of and for the periods presented in such quarterly report on Form 10-Q. This written statement is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission as an exhibit accompanying such quarterly report and shall not be deemed filed pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
 
 By: /s/Doron Uziel
 Name:  Doron Uziel
 Title:    Chief Financial Officer
 
 Date: May 16, 2011
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>     5
<LEGEND>
   THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION
   EXTRACTED FROM THE BALANCE SHEETS AND STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
   AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
   FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>  1
       
<S>                               <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                     YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                 OCT-31-1995
<PERIOD-START>                    NOV-01-1994
<PERIOD-END>                      OCT-31-1995
<CASH>                            $ 2,129,988
<SECURITIES>                        4,840,847
<RECEIVABLES>                       1,057,094
<ALLOWANCES>                           11,900
<INVENTORY>                                 0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                    8,474,127
<PP&E>                             12,852,778
<DEPRECIATION>                     (2,025,624)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                     21,963,850
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>               1,513,644
<BONDS>                                     0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>               3,382,965
<PREFERRED>                                 0
<COMMON>                                    0
<OTHER-SE>                         12,879,673
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>       21,963,850
<SALES>                                     0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                    9,515,438
<CGS>                                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                       6,247,576
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                            0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                     3,267,862
<INCOME-TAX>                        1,252,412
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                 2,015,450
<DISCONTINUED>                              0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                             0
<CHANGES>                                   0
<NET-INCOME>                        2,015,450
<EPS-PRIMARY>                            2.97
<EPS-DILUTED>                            2.97
        

</TABLE>
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED DECEMBER 13, 2023

NO. 03-22-00423-CV

BLF LLC, Bradford W. Bayliff, and Lisa E. W. Bayliff, Appellants

v.

The Landing at Blanco Property Owners Association, Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 33RD DISTRICT COURT OF BLANCO COUNTY

BEFORE JUSTICES BAKER, KELLY, AND SMITH

AFFIRMED -- OPINION BY JUSTICE KELLY

This is an appeal from the judgment signed by the trial court on July 6, 2022. Having reviewed 

the record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was no reversible error in the 

trial court’s judgment. Therefore, the Court affirms the trial court’s judgment. The appellants

shall pay all costs relating to this appeal.
Exhibit 23.1

                                AUDITOR'S CONSENT




We have issued our report dated June 24, 2003 (except for Note 9, as to which
the date is July 8, 2003 and Note 15, as to which the date is July 10, 2003),
accompanying the consolidated financial statements and schedule included in the
annual report of The Singing Machine Company, Inc. on Form 10-K for the year
ended March 31, 2003 (which contains an explanatory paragraph relating to The
Singing Machine Company, Inc.'s ability to continue as a going concern as
described in Note 2 of the financial statements). We hereby consent to the
incorporation by reference of the aforementioned report in the Registration
Statement of The Singing Machine Company, Inc. on Form S-8 filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") on September 13, 2002 (File No.
333-99543) and the Registration Statement on Form S-8 filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on April 27, 2001 and amended with Post Effective
Amendment No. 1 filed with the SEC on September 13, 2002 (File No. 333-59684).



/s/ Grant Thornton LLP
----------------------
Miami, Florida
June 24, 2003
Part I, Section B, Item 2(e) Chemical Structure Diagram

TS-C5075P
EXHIBIT 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Pemstar Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ending March 31, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Greg S. Lea, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ Greg S. Lea

Greg
S. Lea

Chief Financial Officer

February 10, 2004
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 386

To amend title 18, United States Code, to provide the penalty of death

for certain murders of State and local correctional officers by incarcerated persons, and for other purposes.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JANUARY 5, 1993

Mr. SOLOMON introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on the Judiciary

A BILL

To amend title 18, United States Code, to provide the penalty of death for certain murders of State and local

correctional officers by incarcerated persons, and for

other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Correction Officer Pro5 tection Act of 1993’’.
2

•HR 386 IH

1 SEC. 2. TITLE 18 AMENDMENT.

2 (a) IN GENERAL.—Chapter 51 (relating to homicide)

3 of title 18, United States Code, is amended by adding at

4 the end the following:

5 ‘‘§ 1118. Murder of State and local correctional offi6 cers by prisoners

7 ‘‘(a) Whoever, being incarcerated pursuant to a con8 viction for crime, kills an individual who is a State or local

9 correctional officer—

10 ‘‘(1) while such individual is engaged in carry11 ing out official duties as such officer;

12 ‘‘(2) because of the nature of the official duties

13 of such officer; or

14 ‘‘(3) because of such individual’s being such an

15 officer;

16 shall be subject to the penalty of death, if the killing is

17 a first degree murder, and subject to the penalties pro18 vided in sections 1111 and 1112 of this title in any other

19 case.

20 ‘‘(b) As used in this section—

21 ‘‘(1) the term ‘State or local correctional offi22 cer’ means any person who is a State or local officer

23 or employee, as such term is defined in section 1501

24 of title 5, and who in the course of official duty per25 forms corrections-related or law enforcement func26 tions; and
3

•HR 386 IH

1 ‘‘(2) the term ‘State or local government’ in2 cludes the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, and

3 any other territory and possession of the United

4 States.

5 ‘‘(c) The procedures applicable to a penalty of death

6 under section 902(i) of the Federal Aviation Act of 1958

7 (49 U.S.C. App. 1472(i)) shall also be applicable, as near8 ly as practicable, to a penalty of death under this sec9 tion.’’.

10 (b) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections

11 at the beginning of chapter 51 of title 18, United States

12 Code, is amended by adding at the end the following:

‘‘1118. Murder of State and local correctional officers by prisoners.’’.

Æ
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 3324

To amend the Public Health Service Act to establish a program of providing

information and education to the public on the prevention and treatment

of eating disorders.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

OCTOBER 20, 1993

Mrs. SCHROEDER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Energy and Commerce

A BILL

To amend the Public Health Service Act to establish a program of providing information and education to the public on the prevention and treatment of eating disorders.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Eating Disorders In5 formation and Education Act of 1993’’.

6 SEC. 2. FINDINGS.

7 The Congress finds the following:
2

•HR 3324 IH

1 (1) Eating disorders include anorexia nervosa,

2 bulimia nervosa, and binge eating disorder, as well

3 as eating disorders not otherwise defined.

4 (2) Anorexia nervosa and bulimia each can re5 sult in death, cardiac impairments, depression, sub6 stance abuse, osteoporosis, infertility, amenorrhea,

7 anemia, and other medical conditions.

8 (3) Medical authorities are uncertain to what

9 extent eating disorders are caused by physiological

10 factors, by psychosocial factors, or by both.

11 (4) Such disorders primarily affect women. As

12 many as 7 percent of women may be experiencing

13 eating disorders, and the rate of new cases is in14 creasing. As many as 80 percent of women may dur15 ing their lifetimes display symptoms of eating dis16 orders.

17 (5) There are effective treatments for some eat18 ing disorders.

19 SEC. 3. PUBLIC INFORMATION AND EDUCATION ON EATING

20 DISORDERS.

21 Subpart 3 of part B of title V of the Public Health

22 Service Act (42 U.S.C. 290bb-31 et seq.), as added by sec23 tion 115 of Public Law 102–321 (106 Stat. 346), is

24 amended by adding at the end the following section:
3

•HR 3324 IH

1 ‘‘EATING DISORDERS

2 ‘‘SEC. 520C. (a) INFORMATION AND EDUCATION.—

3 The Secretary, acting through the Director of the Center

4 for Mental Health Services, shall carry out a program to

5 provide information and education to the public on the

6 prevention and treatment of eating disorders.

7 ‘‘(b) TOLL-FREE TELEPHONE COMMUNICATIONS.—

8 In carrying out subsection (a), the Secretary shall provide

9 for the operation of toll-free telephone communications to

10 provide information to the public on eating disorders, in11 cluding referrals for services for the prevention and treat12 ment of such disorders. Such communications shall be

13 available on a 24-hour, 7-day basis.

14 ‘‘(c) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.—For the

15 purpose of carrying out this section, there are authorized

16 to be appropriated $2,000,000 for fiscal year 1994, and

17 such sums as may be necessary for each of the fiscal years

18 1994 through 1996.’’.

Æ
#### Claude R. ROSS, Appellant, v. BOYNTON BEACH FARMS, INC., Appellee.

No. 38858.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Sept. 23, 1970.

Appeal dismissed.