alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)

In connection with this Report on Form 10-Q for the three and nine months ended June 30, 2019, or the Report, of PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd., or the Registrant, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Aviv Efrat, Chief Financial Officer of the Registrant, hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge, that:

 

|        |     |                                                                                                                                        |
|--------|-----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and |

 

|        |     |                                                                                                                                                         |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant. |

 

|                                                       |
|-------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                  |
| /s/ Aviv Efrat                                        |
| Name:  Aviv Efrat                           |
| Title:    Chief Financial Officer |
| Date:    August 7, 2019      |
EXHIBIT 32





DIGIPATH, INC.





CERTIFICATION


PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


(SUBSECTIONS (a) AND (b) OF SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18,


UNITED STATES CODE)








Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), the undersigned officer of DigiPath, Inc. (the “Company”), does hereby certify with respect to the Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-Q for the period ended December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), to the best of the undersigned’s knowledge that:





(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of  1934; and





(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








January 26, 2011/s/ ERIC STOPPENHAGENEric Stoppenhagen

Principal Executive Officer

Principal Financial Officer
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         August 24, 2018.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Elizabeth Reed, 202-268-3179.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on August 21, 2018, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Express Contract 63 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2018-212, CP2018-294.                

Elizabeth Reed,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2018-18383 Filed 8-23-18; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
First Amendment to the Constellation Energy Group, Inc. Employee Savings Plan



 Exhibit 10.69 

FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE 

CONSTELLATION ENERGY GROUP, INC. 

EMPLOYEE SAVINGS PLAN 

(Amended and Restated Effective January 31, 2012) 

WHEREAS, Exelon Corporation (the “Company”) sponsors the Constellation Energy Group, Inc. Employee Savings Plan for (Amended and
Restated Effective as of January 31, 2012) (the “Plan”), which is intended to meet the requirements of the provisions of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, (as amended) (the “Code”); and 

WHEREAS, the Company desires to amend the Plan in certain respects; and 

WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 12.1 of the Plan the Chief Human Resources Officer may authorize any amendment to the Plan that does not
increase Plan liabilities materially; 
 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Plan is hereby amended as follows, effective
January 1, 2012: 
  

	 	1.	By adding a new paragraph at the end of Section 11.5(a) as follows: 


Notwithstanding the foregoing, with respect to a tender offer for the purchase or exchange of less than five percent
(5%) of the outstanding shares of Common Stock, the Company shall direct the Trustee with respect to the sale, exchange or transfer of the shares of Common Stock held in the Trust Fund, and the Trustee shall follow the direction of the Company.

 ******** 







 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Exelon Corporation has caused this instrument to be executed by its Senior
Vice President & Chief Human Resources Officer, on this          day of June, 2012. 
  

			
	EXELON CORPORATION
		
	By:	 	 
		 	Senior Vice President &
		 	Chief Human Resources Officer
<partyblock><br><br><div align="center"><b><font size="+1">6225 Broadway Property LP, Plaintiff-Respondent, <br><br>against<br><br>Joel Shulman, Defendant-Appellant.</font></b></div><br><br><p>Defendant appeals from a judgment of the Small Claims Part of the Civil Court of the City of New York, Bronx County (Joseph E. Capella, J.), entered on or about March 8, 2016, after trial, in favor of plaintiff and awarding it damages in the principal sum of $294.76, and dismissing defendant's counterclaim.</p><p>Per Curiam.</p><p>Judgment (Joseph E. Capella, J.), entered on or about March 8, 2016, affirmed, without costs.</p><p>A judgment rendered in the Small Claims Part of the Civil Court will be sustained on appeal unless it is shown that "substantial justice has not been done between the parties according to the rules and principles of substantive law" (CCA 1807; <i>Williams v Roper</i>, 269 AD2d 125 [2000], <i>lv dismissed</i> 95 NY2d 898 [2000]). Applying that limited standard of review here, we find no basis to substitute our judgment for that of the trial court in awarding plaintiff-landlord a recovery for repair expenses which exceeded the amount of defendant-tenant's security deposit. Plaintiff produced competent proof that defendant caused damages to the leased apartment that went beyond ordinary wear and tear. Accordingly, defendant-tenant's counterclaim seeking recovery of his rent deposit was properly dismissed. Particularly in the context of small claims cases, the decision of the fact-finding court is entitled to deference where it rests in large measure on considerations relating to the credibility of witnesses (see <i>Williams v Roper</i>, 269 AD2d at 126). </p><p>THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE COURT.</p><br>I concur I concur I concur<br>Decision Date: November 16, 2016<br><br><div align="center"><form method="LINK" action="../../slipidx/at_1_idxtable.shtml"><input type="submit" value="Return to Decision List"></form></div></partyblock>
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 400 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 400

To direct the President to impose certain limitations on the amount of 
   milk protein products that may be imported into the United States.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 5, 1993

 Mr. Solomon introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To direct the President to impose certain limitations on the amount of 
   milk protein products that may be imported into the United States.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled, That to ensure that 
quantities of milk protein products imported into the United States 
will not render ineffective, or materially interfere with, price 
support operations undertaken by the Department of Agriculture under 
the Agricultural Act of 1949 (7 U.S.C. 1441 et seq.), the President 
shall by proclamation limit the quantity of milk protein products, 
including casein, caseinates, lactalbumin, and whey protein 
concentrates, or mixtures containing not less than 5 per centum of such 
products, which may be entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for 
consumption, in any calendar year (or portion of a calendar year in the 
case of the calendar year in which this Act is enacted) during the 
period beginning on the day after the date of the enactment of this Act 
and ending December 31, 1994, to a quantity equal to 50 per centum of 
the average of the quantity of such milk protein products annually 
imported into the United States during the period beginning January 1, 
1983, and ending December 1, 1987 (or, in the case of such portion of a 
calendar year, a proportionately lesser quantity). Such proclamation 
shall be considered a proclamation which is issued by the President 
under section 22 of the Agricultural Adjustment Act (7 U.S.C. 624) and 
which meets the requirements of such section.

                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 10.19

 

Supplementary Agreement for Land Use License

 

This Supplementary Agreement is entered into by and between:

 

Shanghai Chengli Investment Consulting Firm (“Party A”)

Address: No. Room A2551, No.1 Building, 2758 Song Jin Gong Lu, Zhang Yan County, Jin

Shan District, Post Code: 201514, Shanghai, P. R. China.

Representative:  HOU Xiaojing  Title: Legal Representative

 

The British International School, Shanghai (“Party B”)

Address: 600 Cambridge Forest New Town, 2729 Hunan Road, Zip code: 201315

Representative: Andrew Fitzmaurice  Title: Legal Representative

 

WHEREAS:

 

A.            The Parties entered into the Agreement for Land Use License on 19 September 2012 (the “Land Use License Agreement”) to allow for Party B’s use of the Adjacent Land for a Sports Field;

 

B.            The defined terms in the Land Use License Agreement, particularly those bolded herein, are fully adopted in this Supplementary Agreement;

 

C.            In addition to granting Party B a license, commencing l September 2012, to use the Adjacent Land for twenty four (24) years, which is the remaining lease term under the Lease Agreement, Party B made the Undertaking to Party A in the Land Use License Agreement;

 

1











 

D.            The Parties agreed to enter into further discussions about Party A’s Undertaking and Party B’s obligation in relation to the Undertaking;

 

NOW THEREFORE, the Parties agree as follows:

 

l.                  To fulfill the Undertaking, Party A shall secure the winning bid in the Bidding Process as soon as possible.  Upon fulfilling the Undertaking, the Adjacent Land shall, to the extent possible, be incorporated as part of the premises leased under the Lease Agreement.

 

2.              Irrespective of whether Party A fulfills the Undertaking, Party B’s use of the Adjacent Land shall remain valid and unaffected. Provided that Party B pays Party A in full the amounts stipulated under the Land Use License Agreement, Party A guarantees to Party B the full enjoyment of Party B’s rights under the License.

 

3.              In consideration for Party A’s fulfillment of the Undertaking, which would allow Party A to convert the purpose of use of the Adjacent Land to suit Party B’s intended use over the remaining lease term, Party B shall pay to Party A of RMB Seven Million Four Hundred Thousand Yuan (RMB 7.4 million) per year, with the years commencing 30 September 2013 and ending 31 August 2018. Specifically, Party B shall pay to Party A: RMB One Million Eight Hundred Fifty Thousand Yuan (RMB 1.85 million) on the last business days in each of the months of September and December 2013; March, June, September and December 2014  through 2017; and March and June 2018. Party B shall in no event be obligated to make to Party A any compensation other than the ones stated herein.

 

4.              Upon each payment, Party A shall provide to Party B official invoice for the payment. 

 

2











 

All costs and taxes incurred in relation to such invoice shall be borne by Party A.

 

5.              The Supplementary Agreement shall take effect upon execution by the Parties.

 



 

3
<PAGE>



                                                         EXHIBIT 23.1
                                                         ------------

                        INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

       We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements on Form S-8 (No's. 333-48364, 333-38420, 333-31696, 333-93117,
333-92327, 333-11294, 333-88421, 333-39553 and 333-106742) of our report
dated February 20, 2004 (with respect to Note 17, March 1, 2004) on our
audits of the consolidated financial statements of Applied Digital
Solutions, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2003 and 2002 and for
each of the years in the two-year period ended December 31, 2003, and
related financial statement schedules included in the Annual Report on Form
10-K.

Eisner LLP

New York, New York
March 12, 2004
# C_2015113EN.01000301.xml

| 8.4.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 113/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.4.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 113/3

---

Notice for the attention of the data subjects to whom the restrictive measures provided for in Council Regulation (EU) No 359/2011 concerning restrictive measures directed against certain persons, entities and bodies in view of the situation in Iran apply

(2015/C 113/04)

The attention of data subjects is drawn to the following information in accordance with Article 12 of Regulation (EC) No 45/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council (1):

1

The legal basis for this processing operation is Council Regulation (EU) No 359/2011 (2).

2

The controller of this processing operation is the Council of the European Union represented by the Director-General of DG C (Foreign Affairs, Enlargement, Civil Protection) of the General Secretariat of the Council and the department entrusted with the processing operation is the Unit 1C of DG C that can be contacted at:

| Council of the European Union |
| --- |
| General Secretariat |
| DG C 1C |
| Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175 |
| 1048 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |
| E-mail: sanctions@consilium.europa.eu |

Council of the European Union

General Secretariat

DG C 1C

Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175

1048 Bruxelles/Brussel

BELGIQUE/BELGIË

E-mail: sanctions@consilium.europa.eu

The purpose of the processing operation is the establishment and updating of the list of persons subject to restrictive measures in accordance with Regulation (EU) No 359/2011.

The data subjects are the natural persons who fulfil listing criteria as laid down in that Regulation.

The personal data collected includes data necessary for the correct identification of the person concerned, the Statement of Reasons and any other data related thereto.

The personal data collected may be shared as necessary with the European External Action Service and the Commission.

Without prejudice to restrictions provided for in Article 20(1)(a) and (d) of Regulation (EC) No 45/2001, requests for access, as well as requests for rectification or objection will be answered in accordance with section 5 of Council Decision 2004/644/EC (3).

3

Personal data will be retained for 5 years from the moment the data subject has been removed from the list of persons subject to the asset freeze or the validity of the measure has expired, or for the duration of court proceedings in the event they had been started.

Data subjects may have recourse to the European Data Protection Supervisor in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 45/2001.

---

(1)  OJ L 8, 12.1.2001, p. 1.

1

(2)  OJ L 100, 14.4.2011, p. 1.

2

(3)  OJ L 296, 21.9.2004, p. 16.

3

---
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-7323

KEVIN EARNEST COX,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

RONALD J. ANGELONE, Director of the Department

of Corrections,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. James E. Bradberry, Magistrate

Judge. (CA-00-778-2)

Submitted: October 24, 2001 Decided: November 13, 2001

Before WILKINS and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Kevin Earnest Cox, Appellant Pro Se. Stephen R. McCullough, Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
* Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) (1994), Cox waived his right

to proceed before a United States district judge and consented to

have a United States magistrate judge conduct all proceedings in

this case.

2

PER CURIAM:

Kevin Earnest Cox seeks to appeal the magistrate judge’s*

order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254

(West 1994 & Supp. 2001). We have reviewed the record and the magistrate judge’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly,

we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on

the reasoning of the magistrate judge. See Cox v. Angelone, No.

CA-00-778-2 (E.D. Va. July 11, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid

the decisional process.

DISMISSED
DISMISS: Opinion filed October 2, 2012.

In The

(nnrt nf \ppiah

Fifth 1itrirt uf ixa at Datta

No. 05-1 2-00994-CV

KAREY FAY TOTTEN AND KATHY LYNN TOTTEN, Appellants

V.

MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION SYSTEMS, INC.,

AS NOMINEE FOR RESMAE MORTGAGE CORPORATiON,

RESNIAE MORTGAGE CORPORATION, QUANTUM SERVICING CORPORATION,

WATERFALL VICTORiA MASTER FUND LIMITED, AND

FIRST OPTION MORTGAGE, Appellees

On Appeal from the 59th Judicial District Court

Grayson County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. CV-10-2002

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Moseley, Fillmore, and Myers

Opinion By Justice Moseley

Before the Court is appellees’ motion to dismiss the appeal. Appellees contend the Court

should dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution.

Appellants’ brief was due on August 9, 2012. By letter dated August 15, 2012, the Court

informed appellants that their briefwas past due. The Court cautioned appellants that ifthey failed

to file a brief with an extension motion within ten days, the appeal would be dismissed. As of

today’s date, appellant has not filed a brief, a motion for extension, or a response to appellees’
motion to dismiss. AccordiniIv, we grant appellees’ motion and dismiss the appeal .SeL’ TEX. R.

App. P. 38.8(a)(1) & 42.3(b) & (c).

/

JiM MOSELEY 7

JUSTICE

1 20994F.P05
QJnnrt uf Appra1i

.Yiftli itrirt uf Irxai at Dat1a

JUDGMENT

KAREY FAY TOTTEN AND KATHY

LYNN TOTTEN, Appellants

No. 05-12-00994-CV V.

MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC

REGISTRATION SYSTEMS, INC., AS

NOMINEE FOR RESMAE MORTGAGE

CORPORATION, RESMAE MORTGAGE

CORPORATION, QUANTUM SERVICING

CO RPORATION, WATERFALL VICTORIA

MASTER FUND LIMITED, AND FIRST

OPTION MORTGAGE, Appellees

Appeal from the 59th Judicial District Court

ofGrayson County. Texas. (Tr.CtJ o. CV-I0-

2002).

Opinion delivered by Justice Moseley,

Justices Fillmore and Myers, participating.

Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, the appeal is DISMISSED.

It is ORDERED that appellees, Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc.. as Nominee

for Resmac Mortgage Corporation, Resmae Mortgage Coiporation, Quantum Servicing Corporation,

Waterfall Victoria Master Fund Limited, and First Option Mortgage, recover their costs ofthe appeal

from appellants, Karey Fay Totten and Kathy Lynn Totten.

4

Judgment entered October 2, 2012.

JIM MOSELEY

JUSTICE
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan



### October 26, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice



### 135090 Michael F. Cavanagh 

### & (3) (4) Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, 

### GRIEVANCE ADMINISTRATOR, Petitioner-Appellee, Justices



### v SC: 135090 ADB No.: 05-79-GA CARL M. WEIDEMAN, III, Respondent-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the motion fo r immediate consideration is GRANTED. The motion for stay is DENIED. The application for leave to appeal remains pending.

l1023 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

October 26, 2007

Clerk
#### STATE of Florida ex rel. William SCALDEFERRI, Relator, v. Jack SANDSTROM, Director of Corrections and Rehabilitation of Dade County, Florida, Respondent.

No. 73-299.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

March 13, 1973.

PER CURIAM.

Habeas corpus dismissed.
# C_2015367EN.01000703.xml

| 5.11.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 367/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.11.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 367/7

---

EUROPEAN MEDICINES AGENCY

Publication of the final accounts for the financial year 2014

(2015/C 367/26)

The complete version of the final accounts may be found at the following address:

http://www.ema.europa.eu/ema/index.jsp?curl=pages/about_us/document_listing/document_listing_000158.jsp&mid=WC0b01ac0580029337#section3

---