alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 385 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 385

   To ensure that agencies establish the appropriate procedures for 
assessing whether or not regulation may result in the taking of private 
             property, so as to avoid such where possible.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 5, 1993

 Mr. Solomon introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To ensure that agencies establish the appropriate procedures for 
assessing whether or not regulation may result in the taking of private 
             property, so as to avoid such where possible.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Private Property Rights Act of 
1993''.

SEC. 2. DEFINITIONS.

    As used in this Act:
            (1) The term ``agency'' means all executive branch agencies 
        which engage in activity with the potential for taking private 
        property, including any military department of the United 
        States Government, any United States Government corporation, 
        United States Government controlled corporation, or other 
        establishment in the Executive Branch of the United States 
        Government.
            (2) The term ``taking of private property'' means an 
        activity wherein private property is taken such that 
        compensation to the owner of that property is required by the 
        Fifth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States.

SEC. 3. PROTECTION OF PRIVATE PROPERTY.

    No regulation promulgated after the date of enactment of this Act 
by any agency shall become effective until the issuing agency is 
certified by the Attorney General to be in compliance with Executive 
Order 12630 or similar procedures to assess the potential for the 
taking of private property in the course of Federal regulatory 
activity, with the goal of minimizing such where possible.

SEC. 4. JUDICIAL REVIEW.

    (a) Judicial review of actions taken pursuant to this Act shall be 
limited to whether the Attorney General has certified the issuing 
agency as in compliance with Executive Order 12630 or similar 
procedures, such review to be permitted in the same forum and at the 
same time as the issued regulations are otherwise subject to judicial 
review. Only persons adversely affected or grieved by agency action 
shall have standing to challenge that action as contrary to this Act. 
In no event shall such review include any issue for which the United 
States Claims Court has jurisdiction.
    (b) Nothing in this section shall affect any otherwise available 
judicial review of agency action.

                                 <all>
```
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3942 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 3942

 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to exclude strike benefits 
                           from gross income.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 2, 1994

Mr. Applegate introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to exclude strike benefits 
                           from gross income.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXCLUSION OF STRIKE BENEFITS.

    (a) General Rule.--Part III of subchapter B of chapter 1 of the 
Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to items specifically excluded 
from gross income) is amended by redesignating section 137 as section 
138 and by inserting after section 136 the following new section:

``SEC. 137. STRIKE BENEFITS.

    ``(a) General Rule.--Gross income does not include any strike 
benefit.
    ``(b) Strike Benefit.--For purposes of subsection (a), the term 
`strike benefit' means any payment to an individual if--
            ``(1) such payment is made on account of such individual 
        being on strike or prevented from working because of a lockout 
        or other labor dispute, and
            ``(2) such payment is from a fund established by a labor 
        organization.''
    (b) Clerical Amendment.--The table of sections for part III of 
subchapter B of chapter 1 of such Code is amended by striking the item 
relating to section 137 and inserting the following:

                              ``Sec. 137. Strike benefits.
                              ``Sec. 138. Cross references to other 
                                        Acts.''
    (c) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply to payments received after December 31, 1993.

                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION of CEO and CFO PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of FS Energy and Power Fund (the "Company") for the three months ended
June 30, 2013, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Form 10-Q"), Michael C. Forman, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Edward T.
Gallivan, Jr., as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that, to my knowledge:



Dated: August 14, 2013/s/ MICHAEL C. FORMAN Michael C. Forman Chief Executive Officer/s/ EDWARD T. GALLIVAN, JR. Edward T. Gallivan, Jr. Chief Financial Officer


---



QuickLinks
EX-10.T



 EXHIBIT 10T 

COGNEX CORPORATION 

AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT WITH ROBERT WILLETT 

November 14, 2008 
 Robert Willett 

c/o Cognex Corporation One Vision Drive Natick, MA 01760 
 Dear
Mr. Willett: 
 Reference is made to that certain Employment Agreement, dated as of June 17, 2008 (the
“Agreement”), between you and Cognex Corporation, a Massachusetts corporation (the “Company”). This letter is intended to document the desire of both parties to amend the Agreement in order to reflect the
requirements of Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, and the regulations promulgated thereunder. 
 By
signing below, you hereby agree with the Company that Section 3 of the Agreement be amended by adding the following to the end of the fourth bullet point -Relocation Assistance: “Such reimbursement shall be made on or before the
last day of the taxable year following the taxable year in which such relocation expenses are incurred.” Except as amended by this letter agreement, the terms of the Agreement shall otherwise remain in full force and effect. 

Please acknowledge your agreement with the foregoing by signing below in the designated space. 

 

					
	Sincerely,
	
	COGNEX CORPORATION
			
		 	By:	 	 /s/ Robert J. Shillman

		
		 	Robert J. Shillman
		 	Chairman, President and CEO


  

	
	Acknowledged and agreed to:
	
	 /s/ Robert Willett

	Robert Willett
	Date: November 14, 2008
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  I, Todd Bauman, Chief Executive Officer of Bauman Estate Planning, Inc (the Company) certify that:  1. I have reviewed the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of the Company;  2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; and  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Company as of, and for, the period presented in this report.  Date: May 28, 2015  /s/ Todd Bauman Todd Bauman Chief Executive Officer
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

EDWARD FREEMAN,

Petitioner

v.

MAJOR HYUNDAI OF STROUDSBURG,

Respondent :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 165 MM 2016

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 19th day of January , 201 7

, the Petition for Leave to File Petition

for Allowance of Appeal Nunc Pro Tunc is DENIED

.
<PAGE>

                                                                     Exhibit 7.1

                      GRUPO IUSACELL CELULAR, S.A. DE C.V.
          RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES PURSUANT TO MEXICAN GAAP
              THOUSANDS OF CONSTANT PESOS AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2003

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                                         1999        2000        2001         2002          2003
                                                                      ----------   ---------   ---------   -----------   -----------

<S>                                                                   <C>          <C>         <C>         <C>           <C>
Income (loss) from continuing operations                                478,149    (739,036)   (327,167)   (1,103,170)   (3,327,300)
Add income tax, assets tax and deffered income tax                      165,837     171,823     160,908       116,051       267,024
                                                                      ---------    --------    --------    ----------    ----------
Pretax income (loss) from continuing operations                         643,986    (567,213)   (166,259)     (987,119)   (3,060,276)
Add:
Integral cost of financing (expense only)                               362,182     592,357     450,371       412,163       367,144
Amortization of debt expense and discount of premium
Interest portion of rent expense                                          3,108       3,108         777
Losses from < 50% owned affiliates                                       24,952      20,345      41,976         9,727        17,964
Amortized portion of capitalized integral cost of financing              19,419      37,012      39,327        40,726        39,521

                                                                      ---------    --------    --------    ----------    ----------
ADJUSTED EARNINGS (A)                                                 1,053,647      85,609     366,192      (524,503)   (2,635,647)

Fixed charges:
Integral cost of financing (whether expensed or capitalized)            362,182     592,357     450,371       939,495       753,979
Amortization of debt expense and discount or premium                         --          --          --            --            --
The interest portion of rent expense                                      3,108       3,108         777            --            --
Preffered stock dividend requirement
                                                                      ---------    --------    --------    ----------    ----------
TOTAL FIXED CHARGES (B)                                                 365,290     595,465     451,148       939,495       753,979


EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES (A/B)                                          2.8844     (0.1438)    (0.8117)      (0.5583)      (3.4957)

ADJUSTED PRETAX EARNINGS LESS FIXED CHARGES                             688,357    (509,856)    (84,956)   (1,463,998)   (3,389,626)

                                                                             (1)         (1)          1             1            --
</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3724 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 3724

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                 May 25 (legislative day, May 16), 1994

            Received; read twice and placed on the calendar

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
   To designate the United States courthouse located in Bridgeport, 
        Connecticut, as the ``Brien McMahon Federal Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The United States courthouse located at 915 Lafayette Boulevard in 
Bridgeport, Connecticut, shall be known and designated as the ``Brien 
McMahon Federal Building''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the courthouse referred to in section 1 
shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Brien McMahon Federal 
Building''.

            Passed the House of Representatives May 23, 1994.

            Attest:

                                           DONNALD K. ANDERSON,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
# C_2018086EN.01014901.xml

| 6.3.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 86/149 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.3.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 86/149

---

P8_TA(2016)0240

EU-Colombia and Peru Trade Agreement (accession of Croatia) ***

European Parliament legislative resolution of 7 June 2016 on the draft Council decision on the conclusion, on behalf of the European Union and its Member States, of the Additional Protocol to the Trade Agreement between the European Union and its Member States, of the one part, and Colombia and Peru, of the other part, to take account of the accession of the Republic of Croatia to the European Union (12594/2014 — C8-0180/2015 — 2014/0234(NLE))

(Consent)

(2018/C 086/23)

The European Parliament,

The European Parliament

| — | having regard to the draft Council decision (12594/2014), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the draft Council decision (12594/2014),

| — | having regard to the Additional Protocol to the Trade Agreement between the European Union and its Member States, of the one part, and Colombia and Peru, of the other part, to take account of the accession of the Republic of Croatia to the European Union (12595/2014), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the Additional Protocol to the Trade Agreement between the European Union and its Member States, of the one part, and Colombia and Peru, of the other part, to take account of the accession of the Republic of Croatia to the European Union (12595/2014),

| — | having regard to the request for consent submitted by the Council in accordance with Articles 91, 100(2), 207 and Article 218 (6), second subparagraph, point (a) (v) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (C8-0180/2015), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the request for consent submitted by the Council in accordance with Articles 91, 100(2), 207 and Article 218 (6), second subparagraph, point (a) (v) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (C8-0180/2015),

| — | having regard to Rule 99(1), first and third subparagraphs, Rule 99(2), and Rule 108(7) of its Rules of Procedure, |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to Rule 99(1), first and third subparagraphs, Rule 99(2), and Rule 108(7) of its Rules of Procedure,

| — | having regard to the recommendation of the Committee on International Trade (A8-0155/2016), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the recommendation of the Committee on International Trade (A8-0155/2016),

| 1. | Gives its consent to conclusion of the additional protocol; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Gives its consent to conclusion of the additional protocol;

| 2. | Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council, the Commission and the governments and parliaments of the Member States and of the Republic of Colombia and the Republic of Peru. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council, the Commission and the governments and parliaments of the Member States and of the Republic of Colombia and the Republic of Peru.

---
I

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 4020

To suspend temporarily the duty on ACM.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 11, 1994

Mr. HOEKSTRA introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Ways and Means

A BILL

To suspend temporarily the duty on ACM.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. TEMPORARY SUSPENSION OF DUTY.

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following

7 new heading:

‘‘ 9902.31.12 3-(acetoxy)-3-

Cyanopropyl]methylphophinicaid, 2-

methylproply ester (provided for in subheading

2931.00.50) ........................ Free No change No change On or before

12/31/98 ’’.

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by

9 this section applies with respect to goods entered, or with-
2

•HR 4020 IH

1 drawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after the

2 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.

Æ
#### PORT SEWALL REALTY CO., Appellant, v. Robert C. CHRISTIE and Hazel E. Christie, his wife, Appellees.

No. 69-795.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Oct. 21, 1970.

Rehearing Denied Dec. 29, 1970.

*PER*CURIAM.

Affirmed.
<PAGE>



                                                              EXHIBIT 21.1

LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES

NAMES OF SUBSIDIARIES

Cornerstone Sales & Service Corporation, a Delaware Corporation
Cornerstone Propane, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership
Flame, Inc., an Arizona Corporation
Propane Continental, Inc., a Delaware Corporation
Cornerstone Holding Corporation, a Delaware Corporation
Coast Energy Global Services, Inc.
Coast Energy Canada, Inc.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

JAMESON CONAN BURN,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 6 MAL 2019

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 1st day of May, 2019, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.
ACCOUNTANTS' CONSENT

The Board of Directors
Devcon International Corp. and Subsidiaries:

We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statements (No. 33-
32968 and No. 33-59557) on Form S-8 and (No. 33-65235) on Form S-3 of Devcon
International Corp. and subsidiaries of our report dated March 27, 1998,
relating to the consolidated balance sheets of Devcon International Corp. and
subsidiaries as of December 31, 1997 and 1996, and the related consolidated
statements of operations, stockholders' equity and cash flows for each of the
years in the three-year period ended December 31, 1997, and the related
financial statement schedule, which report appears in the December 31, 1997
annual report on Form 10- K of Devcon International Corp. and subsidiaries.

                                                           KPMG PEAT MARWICK LLP

Fort Lauderdale, Florida
March 27, 1998
#### Neil MALONEY, Appellant, v. John H. HICKS, Appellee.

No. 69-508.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Sept. 30, 1970.

Elliot L. Miller, Miami, for appellant.

No appearance for appellee.

STEWART, JAMES R., Jr., Associate Judge.

Plaintiff obtained a $3,000.00 judgment against defendant in the State of Arkansas. The defendant was not served personally within or without Arkansas and did not appear or defend. Plaintiff then brought suit on the foreign judgment in Florida. This appeal is from the entry of a final summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff. We reverse.

In pleading to the complaint, the defendant affirmatively set forth the following defense:

> The Judgment here sued upon, issued by an Arkansas Court is illegal and void, and is an act in excess of the jurisdiction of the said Arkansas Court in that the Arkansas Court had not law*621fully acquired jurisdiction of the person of the Defendant herein, who was not served with process or otherwise notified of the pendency of the Arkansas proceedings, * * *

The affidavit filed in support of plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment and the plaintiff’s answers to interrogatories do not clearly indicate which of two Arkansas statutes were utilized to obtain jurisdiction over the defendant. However, as applied between these parties, both statutes require a mailing to be sent to the defendant and for a receipt or other evidence of personal delivery to the addressee to be obtained.

Copies of affidavits filed in connection with the Arkansas suit were attached to the plaintiff’s answers to interrogatories. These affidavits state that the required statutory mailings were delivered by postal authorities to the defendant in Florida but were refused. In an affidavit filed in opposition to the motion for summary judgment the defendant denied any knowledge of the Arkansas suit. In order to grant the motion for summary judgment, it was necessary for the trial court to make a factual determination concerning the defendant’s receipt of the Arkansas mailings and such a determination is not permissible in connection with a summary judgment.

The party moving for summary judgment has the burden of showing the absence of a genuine issue of fact. All inferences of fact must be drawn from the proof in favor of the party opposing the motion. Liberty Mutual Insurance Company v. Stuckey, Fla.App.1969, 220 So.2d 421.

A genuine issue of material fact exists and for this reason the trial court is precluded from entering summary judgment.

Reversed.

McCAIN and OWEN, JJ., concur.
EXHIBIT 32.1
 
 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
 PURSUANT TO
 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
  I, Peter Reichard, President and Director of Europa Acquisition VII, Inc., (the "Company"), hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:
  (1) The Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended April 30, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
  By:
/s/ Peter ReichardPeter ReichardPresident and Director(Principal Executive Officer and

Principal Financial Officer)
 
 Date: June 14, 2011
    
 This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and  shall not be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
  A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.