alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Small Business Administration

          - [Disaster Declaration # 15622 and # 15623; California Disaster Number CA-00288]

# AGENCY:

U.S. Small Business Administration.

# ACTION:

Amendment 1.

# SUMMARY:

This is an amendment of the Presidential declaration of a major disaster for the State of California (FEMA-4382-DR), dated 08/04/2018.

*Incident:*                         Wildfires and High Winds.                    

*Incident Period:*                         07/23/2018 and continuing.                    

# DATES:

Issued on 08/17/2018.

*Physical Loan Application Deadline Date:*                         10/03/2018.                    

*Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date:*                         05/06/2019.                    

# ADDRESSES:

Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

A. Escobar, Office of Disaster Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street SW, Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416, (202) 205-6734.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The notice of the President's major disaster declaration for the State of California, dated 08/04/2018, is hereby amended to include the following areas as adversely affected by the disaster:

*Primary Counties (Physical Damage and Economic Injury Loans):*                     Lake                

*Contiguous Counties (Economic Injury Loans Only):*

*California:*                     Colusa, Glenn, Mendocino, Napa, Sonoma, Yolo.                

All other information in the original declaration remains unchanged.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number 59008)

James Rivera,

Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance.

[FR Doc. 2018-18538 Filed 8-27-18; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
<PAGE>

                       SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                             WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

                      ------------------------------------

                                    FORM 8-K

                                 CURRENT REPORT
                     PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF THE
                             SECURITIES ACT OF 1934

                               September 26, 2000
                Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported)

                            K-TEL INTERNATIONAL, INC.
               (Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Charter)

MINNESOTA                      0-6664                      41-0946588

(State or Other                (Commission File Number)    (IRS Employer
Jurisdiction of Incorporation)                             Identification No.)

            2605 Fernbrook Lane North, Plymouth, Minnesota 55447-4736
            ---------------------------------------------------------
                    (Address of Principal Executive Offices)

                                 (763) 559-6800
                                 --------------
              (Registrant's telephone number, including area code)


<PAGE>

ITEM 1.  CHANGES IN CONTROL OF REGISTRANT.

         Not Applicable.

ITEM 2.  ACQUISITION OR DISPOSITION OF ASSETS.

         Not Applicable.

ITEM 3.  BANKRUPTCY OR RECEIVERSHIP.

         Not Applicable.

ITEM 4.  CHANGES IN REGISTRANT'S CERTIFYING ACCOUNTANT.

         Not Applicable.

ITEM 5.  OTHER EVENTS.

         On September 26, 2000, K-tel International, Inc. (the "Company")
announced that its Common Stock had been delisted from the Nasdaq National
Market. Attached to this Current Report on Form 8-K as Exhibit 99 is a copy of
the Company's related press release dated September 26, 2000.

ITEM 6.  RESIGNATIONS OF REGISTRANT'S DIRECTORS.

         Not Applicable.

ITEM 7.  FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND EXHIBITS.

         (a)      Financial statements of businesses acquired.

                  Not Applicable.

         (b)      Pro forma financial information.

                  Not Applicable.

         (c)      Exhibits.

                  99       Press Release of the Company dated September 26, 2000


                                       2
<PAGE>

                                    SIGNATURE

         Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

Date:  September 26, 2000                   By:/s/ A. Merrill Ayers
                                               ---------------------------------

                                            Name:    A. Merrill Ayers

                                            Title:   Chief Financial Officer






                                       3
<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT INDEX

NUMBER                              DESCRIPTION
------                              -----------

99       Press Release of the Company dated September 26, 2000







                                       4
#### In re ESTATE of Mildred E. DICKERHOFF, Deceased.

No. 43044.

Supreme Court of Florida.

April 16, 1973.

Certiorari dismissed. 267 So.2d 388.

CARLTON, C. J., and ADKINS, BOYD, McCAIN and DEKLE, JJ., concur.
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 3589

To designate the lock and dam numbered 4 on the Red River Waterway

in Louisiana as the ‘‘Russell B. Long Lock and Dam’’.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

NOVEMBER 20, 1993

Mr. MCCRERY (for himself, Mr. LIVINGSTON, Mr. TAUZIN, Mr. BAKER of

Louisiana, Mr. HAYES, and Mr. JEFFERSON) introduced the following

bill; which was referred to the Committee on Public Works and

Transportation

A BILL

To designate the lock and dam numbered 4 on the Red

River Waterway in Louisiana as the ‘‘Russell B. Long

Lock and Dam’’.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

4 The lock and dam numbered 4 on the Red River

5 Waterway in Louisiana is designated as the ‘‘Russell B.

6 Long Lock and Dam’’.

7 SEC. 2. LEGAL REFERENCES.

8 Any reference in any law, regulation, document,

9 record, map, or other paper of the United States to the
2

•HR 3589 IH

1 lock and dam referred to in section 1 is deemed to be a

2 reference to the ‘‘Russell B. Long Lock and Dam’’.

Æ
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with this Annual Report of BMB Munai, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended March 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Boris Cherdabayev, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 

 
|   | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 
|   | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company. |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 
| Date: June 14, 2007 | /s/ Boris Cherdabayev                                       |
|---------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                | Boris Cherdabayev, Chief Executive Officer                                                                                                                                                                                                                |  
 

 

 

 

 

  |
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

September 26, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh
Elizabeth A. Weaver 131418 Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Justices Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 131418 COA: 269182 Genesee CC: 02-010378-FH JEREMIAH JOHNSON, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appe al the April 25, 2006 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

d0918 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

September 26, 2006

Clerk
Exhibit 32

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


Certification of Chief Executive Officer

In connection with the Annual Report of Tradequest International, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2003 with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Randall
K. Read, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.






March 26, 2004                   /s/ Randall K. Read
-------------------              -----------------------------------
                                 Randall K. Read
                                 Chief Executive Officer



<PAGE>




Certification of Chief Financial Officer

In connection with the Annual Report of Tradequest International, Inc., (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2003 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Randall K. Read, Chief Financial Officer certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.






March 26, 2004                   /s/ Randall K. Read
-------------------              -----------------------------------
                                 Randall K. Read
                                 Chief Financial Officer
#### Richard G. CRINER, Jr., Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 70-793.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Dec. 30, 1970.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Brevard County; Roger F. Dykes, Judge.

Appeal dismissed.
254 La. 802

#### STATE of Louisiana v. Larry ACOSTA and Peter Mule.

No. 50170.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Oct. 15, 1969.

In re: Larry Acosta and Peter Mule applying for writs of certiorari, mandamus and prohibition.

Writ refused. We find no error or abuse of discretion in the ruling of the trial judge. The Parish Courts of Jefferson Parish are not of equal dignity with the Criminal District Courts of Orleans Parish, and moreover, the prosecution of the charge pending in the Criminal District Court of Orleans Parish, a felony, is entitled to preferential treatment over the prosecution in the Parish Court of Jefferson Parish of a misdemeanor.

McCALEB, J.,

concurs on the ground that the showing made does not warrant the exercise of our supervisory jurisdiction. Relators have an adequate remedy by appeal in the event of their conviction.

HAMLIN, J. I agree with McCaleb, J.
#### George APOSTOLOPOULOS, Appellant, v. Emery E. OLIVER, Jr., Appellee.

No. 2419.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Fourth District.

March 28, 1969.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Martin County; D. C. Smith, Judge.

Appeal dismissed.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA 

RICKY NOLAN, No. 83820 

Appellant, 

vs. 

STEFANY ANN MILEY; AND KATLYN 

M. BRADY, 

Res • ondents. FILED 

DEC 1 3 2021 

ELIZABETH A. BROWN 

CLERK OF SUPREME COURT 

BY 

DEPUlf=K f1/41r

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL 

This is a pro se appeal from a district court order granting a 

motion to dismiss. Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County; Jessica K. 

Peterson, Judge. 

Our review of the documents submitted to this court pursuant 

to NRAP 3(g) reveals a jurisdictional defect. Specifically, the notice of 

appeal appears to be untimely filed under NRAP 4(a) because it appears 

that it was filed more than 30 days after service of written notice of entry of 

the judgment or order. See NRAP 4(a)(4); NRAP 26(c). An untimely notice 

iThe challenged order was filed in district court on June 15, 2021. 

Written notice of entry of the challenged order was served on appellant, via 

email, on June 16, 2021. It appears appellant filed a motion for 

reconsideration on July 1, 2021. The district court issued an order denying 

the motion for reconsideration on August 11, 2021, and written notice of 

entry of the district court's order appears to have been served on appellant 

on August 19, 2021. While appellant's official notice of appeal was not filed 

in district court until November 17, 2021, it appears that he attempted to 

continued on next page... 

S 3-7 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 

(0) 1947A 41401:. 
J. 

Cadish 

Pickering 

Pitith ti'y 

J 

Herndon 

cc: Hon. Jessica K. Peterson, District Judge 

Ricky Nolan 

Attorney General/Carson City 

Attorney General/Las Vegas 

Eighth District Court Clerk 

of appeal fails to vest jurisdiction in this court. See Healy v. 

Volkswctgenwerk Aktiengesellschaft, 103 Nev. 329, 331, 741 P.2d 432, 433 

(1987). Accordingly, we conclude that we lack jurisdiction, and we 

ORDER this appeal DISMISSED. 

file a notice of appeal initially on October 4, 2021, which was rejected, as 

appellant's in forma pauperis status expired on August 27, 2021. However, 

this initial notice of appeal was still outside the 30-day appeal period. See 

NRAP 4(a)(4), NRAP 26(c). 

2 

J. 

SUPREME Coma' 

OF 

NEVADA 

(0) I947A (44P44,
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Department of Agriculture Rural Utilities Service
 AGENCY: Rural Utilities Service, USDA.
 ACTION: Notice of Depreciation Rates for Telecommunications Plant.
 SUMMARY: The United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) Rural Utilities Service (RUS) administers rural utilities programs, including the Telecommunications Program. RUS announces the depreciation rates for telecommunications plant for the period ending December 31, 2017.
 DATES: These rates are applicable immediately and will remain in effect until rates are available for the period ending December 31, 2018.
 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Chad Parker, Assistant Administrator, Telecommunications Program, Rural Utilities Service, STOP 1590—Room 5151, 1400 Independence Avenue SW, Washington, DC 20250-1590. Telephone: (202) 720-9556.


SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In 7 CFR part 1737, Pre-Loan Policies and Procedures Common to Insured and Guaranteed Telecommunications Loans, § 1737.70(e) explains the depreciation rates that are used by RUS in its feasibility studies. § 1737.70(e)(2) refers to median depreciation rates published by RUS for all borrowers. The following chart provides those rates, compiled by RUS, for the reporting period ending December 31, 2017: Median Depreciation Rates of Rural Utilities Service Borrowers by Equipment Category for Period Ending December 31, 2017
Telecommunications
                             plant category
Depreciation
                             rate1. Land and Support Assets:a. Motor vehicles
16.50b. Aircraft
10.05c. Special purpose vehicles
12.00d. Garage and other work equipment
10.00e. Buildings
3.30f. Furniture and office equipment
10.00g. General purpose computers
20.002. Central Office Switching:a. Digital
9.37b. Analog & Electro-mechanical
10.00c. Operator Systems
9.303. Central Office Transmission:a. Radio Systems
10.00b. Circuit equipment
10.004. Information origination/termination:a. Station apparatus
12.00b. Customer premises wiring
10.00c. Large private branch exchanges
11.40d. Public telephone terminal equipment
11.95e. Other terminal equipment
10.005. Cable and wire facilities:a. Aerial cable—poles
6.19b. Aerial cable—metal
6.00c. Aerial cable—fiber
5.10d. Underground cable—metal
5.00e. Underground cable—fiber
5.00f. Buried cable—metal
5.15g. Buried cable—fiber
5.00h. Conduit systems
4.00i. Other
5.00
 Christopher A. McLean, Acting Administrator, Rural Utilities Service.


[FR Doc. 2018-18921 Filed 8-30-18; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE P
NO. 07-03-0259-CV

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AT AMARILLO

PANEL C

OCTOBER 29, 2004

______________________________

DAVIE HARRISON, APPELLANT

V.

NORTHWEST TEXAS HEALTH CARE SYSTEM, ET AL., APPELLEES

_________________________________

FROM THE 181ST DISTRICT COURT OF POTTER COUNTY;

NO. 90,815-B; HONORABLE JOHN B. BOARD, JUDGE

_______________________________

Before JOHNSON, C.J., and QUINN and REAVIS, JJ.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant Davie Harrison, an inmate proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis,

challenges the trial court’s order dismissing his claim for alleged negligence and breach of

duty in medical services provided by Northwest Texas Health Care, System, et al.
1Section 671.001 is entitled “Standard Used in Determining Death,” and section

672.009 is entitled “Use of Information and Records; Confidentiality.”

2

Presenting three issues, Harrison contends the trial court abused its discretion in

dismissing his claim. We affirm.

Citing sections 671.001 and 672.009 of the Texas Health and Safety Code,1

Harrison filed a notice of intent to file a claim against Northwest Texas Health Care System,

et al. pursuant to former article 4590i of the Medical Liability Act within 60 days of the date

of his notice. The notice is dated March 17, 2003, and bears a Potter County District Clerk

file-stamp of April 4, 2003. It is designated in the clerk’s record as “Plaintiff’s Original

Petition.” By the notice, Harrison did not seek any relief against Northwest Texas Health

Care System, et al. On May 12, 2003, the trial court signed a dismissal order citing, among

other reasons, that Harrison’s realistic chance of ultimate success was slight and therefore

frivolous. See Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code Ann. §14.003(b)(1) (Vernon 2002).

By his three issues, Harrison contends the trial court erred in dismissing his claim

(1) as frivolous (2) pursuant to section 14.003(b)(1) and (3) pursuant to Rule 165a of the

Texas Rules of Civil Procedure. Considering the first two issues together, we disagree.

As noted above, by his handwritten document Harrison stated it was only a notice

of claim which he “intend[ed] to file” sixty days after March 17, 2003. Moreover, sections

671.001 and 672.009 have no relevance to the matters asserted in his notice of claim.

Harrison did not allege his damages were within the jurisdictional limits of the court and did
3

not make a demand for judgment or other relief as required by Rule 47 of the Texas Rules

of Civil Procedure. Harrison’s status as a pro se litigant did not excuse the failure to comply

with the rules of procedure. See Holt v. F.F. Enterprises, 990 S.W.2d 756, 759 (Tex.App.--

Amarillo 1998, no pet.). As presented in his notice of claim, Harrison’s realistic chance of

ultimate success was slight, and his filing did not comply with Rule 47. Thus, we overrule

issues one and two. Our disposition of Harrison’s first and second issues pretermits

consideration of his third.

Accordingly, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

Don H. Reavis

 Justice