CALIFORNIA AIR RESOURCES BOARD



### APCD/AQMD RULE EVALUATION FORM -- Page 1

(Electronic Format)

I. GENERAL INFORMATION

District: Sacramento Metropolitan Air Quality Mana gement District

Rule No(s): 203 Date adopted/Amended/Rescinded: Amended January 27, 2011

Rule Title(s): Rule 203 - Prevention of Significan t Deterioration

Date Submitted to ARB: January 27, 2011

If an Amended Rule, Date Last Amended (or Adopted): February 26, 1991

Is the Rule Intended to be Sent to the U.S. EPA as a SIP Revision? Yes No ( If No, do not complete remainder of form)

District Contact: Kevin J. Williams Phone Number: (916) 874-4851 E-mail Address: kjwilliams@airqu ality.org

Narrative Summary of New Rule or Rule Changes: New Rule Amended Rule

Rule 203 is an amended rule that incorporates by re ference federal provisions for implementing GHG

requirements into the Prevention of Significant Det erioration program. Rule 203 is intended to be sen t to the U.S.

EPA as a SIP Revision to the existing SIP Rule 202 from 1984. Rule 203 meets or is equivalent to all

requirements of Title 40 CFR Section 52.21, and 42 USC Sections 7410(a)(2)(C), 7410(l), 7471, 7475, 74 79, and

7515.

The District is requesting expedited processing to allow the District to meet an EPA deadline of Janua ry 31, 2011

for SIP submittal of the rule to allow EPA to appro ve the rule before promulgating a Federal Implement ation Plan.

Pollutant(s) Regulated by the Rule (Check): ROG (NOx) SO2

(CO) PM TAC (name):

II. EFFECT ON EMISSIONS

Complete this section ONLY for rules that, when imp lemented, will result in quantifiable changes in em issions. Attach reference(s) for emission

factor(s) and other information. Attach calculatio n sheet showing how the emission information provid ed below was determined

.

Net Effect on Emissions: Increase Decrease N/A

Emission Reduction Commitment in SIP for this Sourc e Category: none

Inventory Year Used to Calculate Changes in Emissio ns: N/A Area Affected: Sacramento County

Future Year Control Profile Estimate (Provide information on as many years as possible) :

N/ACALIFORNIA AIR RESOURCES BOARD



### APCD/AQMD RULE EVALUATION FORM -- Page 2

(Electronic Format)

Baseline Inventory in the SIP for the Control Measu re: N/A

Emissions Reduction Commitment in the SIP for the C ontrol Measure: N/A

Revised Baseline Inventory (if any): N/A

Revised Emission Reduction Estimate (if developed): N/A

Note that the district’s input to the Rule Evaluati on Form will not be used as input to the ARB’s emis sion forecasting and

planning.

III. SOURCES/ATTAINMENT STATUS

District is: Attainment Nonattainment Split

Approximate Total Number of Small (<100 TPY) Source s Affected by this Amendment: N/A

Percent in Nonattainment Area: N/A%

Number of Large (> 100 TPY) Sources Controlled: 10 Percent in Nonattainment Area: 100%

Name(s) and Location(s) (city and county) of Large (> 100 TPY) Sources Controlled by Rule (Attach additional sheets as

necessary) : Aerojet, Rancho Cordova, Sacramento County; Campbel l Soup, Sacramento, Sacramento County; Sacramento

Metropolitan Utility District (SMUD) Sacramento Cog en Authority (SCA), Sacramento, Sacramento County;

SMUD Sacramento Power Authority (SPA), Sacramento, Sacramento County; SMUD Carson Ice, Sacramento,

Sacramento County; SMUD McClellan, McCellan, Sacram ento County; SMUD Cosumnes Power Plant, Clay Statio n,

Sacramento County; Kiefer Landfill, Sacramento, Sac ramento County; State of California General Service s, Sacramento,

Sacramento County; UCD Medical Center, Sacramento, Sacramento County

IV. EMISSION REDUCTION TECHNOLOGY

Does the Rule Include Emission Limits that are Cont inuous? Yes No

If Yes, Those Limits are in Section(s) of th e Rule.

Other Methods in the Rule for Achieving Emission Re ductions are:

V. OTHER REQUIREMENTS

The Rule Contains:

Emission Limits in Section(s): N/A Work Practic e Standards in Section(s): N/A

Recordkeeping Requirements in Section(s): N/A Rep orting Requirements in Section(s): N/ACALIFORNIA AIR RESOURCES BOARD



### APCD/AQMD RULE EVALUATION FORM -- Page 3

(Electronic Format)

5/1/2002 3

VI. IMPACT ON AIR QUALITY PLAN

No Impact Impacts RFP Impacts attainment

Discussion: