alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EX-4.6



 Exhibit 4.6 






 
  
 ZQ|CERT#|COY|CLS|RGSTRY|ACCT#|TRANSTYPE|RUN#|TRANS# COMMON STOCK PAR VALUE $0.001 COMMON STOCK THIS CERTIFICATE IS TRANSFERABLE IN CANTON, MA, JERSEY CITY, NJ AND COLLEGE STATION, TX
AEROHIVE NETWORKS, INC. INCORPORATED UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE THIS CERTIFIES THAT is the owner of FULLY-PAID AND NON-ASSESSABLE SHARES OF COMMON STOCK OF Aerohive Networks, Inc. (hereinafter called the “Company”),
transferable on the books of the Company in person or by duly authorized attorney, upon surrender of this Certificate properly endorsed. This Certificate and the shares represented hereby, are issued and shall be held subject to all of the
provisions of the Certificate of Incorporation, as amended, and the By-Laws, as amended, of the Company (copies of which are on file with the Company and with the Transfer Agent), to all of which each holder, by acceptance hereof, assents. This
Certificate is not valid unless countersigned and registered by the Transfer Agent and Registrar. Witness the facsimile seal of the Company and the facsimile signatures of its duly authorized officers. DATED DD-MMM-YYYY COUNTERSIGNED AND REGISTERED:
COMPUTERSHARE TRUST COMPANY, N.A. TRANSFER AGENT AND REGISTRAR, Chief Executive Officer By AUTHORIZED SIGNATURE CUSIP XXXXXX XX X Holder ID XXXXXXXXXX Insurance Value 1,000,000.00 Number of Shares 123456 DTC 12345678 123456789012345 Certificate
Numbers Num/No. Denom. Total 1234567890/1234567890 1 1 1 1234567890/1234567890 2 2 2 1234567890/1234567890 3 3 3 1234567890/1234567890 4 4 4 1234567890/1234567890 5 5 5 1234567890/1234567890 6 6 6 Total Transaction 7
**Exhibit
      32.2**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Annual Report of Applied Digital Solutions, Inc. (the
“Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ending December 31, 2005 as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Evan C.
      McKeown, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
      § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
      that:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.














/s/
      Evan C. McKeown


Evan
      C.
      McKeown


Chief
      Financial Officer


March
      15,
      2006







A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      Applied Digital Solutions, Inc. and will be retained by Applied Digital
      Solutions, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
      its
      staff upon request.
<PAGE>


                                                                  EXHIBIT 23.1


INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

We consent to the use in this Registration Statement of Beacon Power
Corporation on Amendment No. 1 to Form S-1 of our report dated May 25, 2000
(September 22, 2000 as to the last two paragraphs of Note 15 and October __,
2000 as to Note 16), appearing in the Prospectus, which is part of this
Registration Statement.

We also consent to the reference to us under the headings "Selected Financial
Data" and "Experts" in such Prospectus.


Boston, Massachusetts
October __, 2000

The foregoing consent is in the form that will be signed upon the occurrence
of the stock split described in Note 16 to the financial statements of the
Company.

/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP
Boston, Massachusetts
September 28, 2000
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 409 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 409

 To amend title II of the Social Security Act to exclude from amounts 
    treated as wages in applying the earnings test remuneration for 
          teaching in public elementary or secondary schools.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 5, 1993

 Mr. Stearns introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend title II of the Social Security Act to exclude from amounts 
    treated as wages in applying the earnings test remuneration for 
          teaching in public elementary or secondary schools.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXCLUSION OF REMUNERATION FOR TEACHING IN PUBLIC ELEMENTARY 
              OR SECONDARY SCHOOLS FROM AMOUNTS TREATED AS WAGES IN 
              DETERMINING EXCESS EARNINGS FOR PURPOSES OF EARNINGS 
              TEST.

    Section 203(f)(5)(C) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 
403(f)(5)(C)) is amended--
            (1) in clause (i), by striking ``or'' at the end;
            (2) in clause (ii), by striking ``employer.'' and inserting 
        ``employer, or''; and
            (3) by adding after clause (ii) the following new clause:
                    ``(iii) any remuneration for service performed for 
                an elementary or secondary school (as defined in 
                section 202(d)(7)(C)) in the public school system of a 
                State (as defined in section 205(c)(2)(C)(iv)) or 
                political subdivision (as defined in section 218(b)(2)) 
                of a State which normally consists of the provision of 
                classroom instruction for not less than 15 hours per 
                week for the school year.''.

SEC. 2. EFFECTIVE DATE.

    The amendments made by section 1 shall apply with respect to 
taxable years beginning on or after January 1, 1994.

                                 <all>
```
Exhibit
32.1



Certifications
of Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer

Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted Pursuant To

Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



The
undersigned, B. P. Allaire, Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
of Foothills Exploration, Inc., (the “Company”) hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | the
    Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A (the “Report”) of the Company for the quarter ended June 30, 2019, fully
    complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
    amended; and
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |     |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  
| | (2) | the information
    contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
    Company at the dates and for periods indicated.                                                              



|Dated:
    August 30, 2019 | By:    | /s/
    B. P. Allaire                                                                                                                       
|-------------------------- | ------ | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                           | Name:  | B. P. Allaire                                                                                                                               
|                           | Title: | Chief Executive Officer and Interim Chief Financial
    Officer (Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3890 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 3890

To renew design patent numbered 251,990, relating to a word game board, 
                       for a period of 10 years.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 23, 1994

   Mr. Levy introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To renew design patent numbered 251,990, relating to a word game board, 
                       for a period of 10 years.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled, That the Secretary of 
Commerce, acting through the Commissioner of Patents, shall, as soon as 
possible after the enactment of this Act, renew design patent numbered 
251,990 (relating to a word game board) for a period of 10 years 
beginning on the date of such renewal, with all the rights pertaining 
thereto.

                                 <all>
```
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

March 28, 2014

h0324 

# Order

Clerk March 28, 2014

148218

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 148218

COA: 316415

Wayne CC: 97

- 009404

- FC

DEREK F. FRANKLIN,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the October 25, 2013

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, bec ause the defendant has

failed to meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D).
----

Action brought on 1 November 2004 by Holger Standertskjöld-Nordenstam against the Commission of the European Communities

(Case T-437/04)

(2005/C 6/86)

Language of the case: French

An action against the Commission of the European Communities was brought before the Court of First Instance of the European Communities on 1 November 2004, by Holger Standertskjöld-Nordenstam, residing in Waterloo (Belgium), represented by T. Demaseure, lawyer.

The applicant claims that the Court should:

Pleas in law and main arguments

The applicant was proposed by his Directorate-General for promotion to Grade A3 in the 2003 procedure. The Consultative Committee on Appointments established a list of fourteen officials most deserving of promotion. The applicant was not on it, having been placed fifteenth. The Appointing Authority subsequently decided to add the names of 2 cabinet members to the list. On that basis the applicant alleges, in support of his action, that the contested decision infringes Article 45 of the Staff Regulations, since the merits of those 2 cabinet members were not compared with those of the other officials, including the applicant.

The applicant also relies on a second plea in law alleging breach of Article 4.2 of the Commission's decision of 19 July 1988. In that context, the applicant alleges that the promotions were made without the prior opinion of the Consultative Committee on Appointments and that the list of the most deserving officials should have included a number of officials' names exceeding the possible promotions by 50 % and not, as in this case, a number of names equal to the number of available posts.

The applicant pleads, lastly, breach of the duty to state reasons.

----
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)

In connection with this Report on Form 10-Q for the three months ended December 31, 2018, or the Report, of PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd., or the Registrant, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Arthur H. Penn, Chief Executive Officer of the Registrant, hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge, that:

 

|        |     |                                                                                                                                        |
|--------|-----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and |

 

|        |     |                                                                                                                                                         |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant. |

 

|                                                       |
|-------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                  |
| /s/ Arthur H. Penn                                    |
| Name:  Arthur H. Penn                       |
| Title:    Chief Executive Officer |
| Date:    February 6, 2019    |
#### In the Matter of 380 Madison Avenue Partners, Appellant. Rite-Way Internal Removal, Inc., Respondent.

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Elliott Wilk, J.), entered on or about November 15, 1990, unanimously affirmed for the reasons stated by Elliott Wilk, J., without costs. No opinion. Concur—Sullivan, J. P., Rosenberger, Kupferman, Ross and Smith, JJ.
Exhibit 32.1   CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Quarterly Report of Dethrone Royalty Holdings, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended April 30, 2012 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Toby McBride, Chief Executive and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:  1. The Report fully complies with requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.   Dated: December 17, 2012  /s/ Toby McBride Toby McBride Title: Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
I

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 3724

To designate the United States courthouse located in Bridgeport, Connecticut,

as the ‘‘Brien McMahon Federal Building’’.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JANUARY 25, 1994

Mrs. KENNELLY introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Public Works and Transportation

A BILL

To designate the United States courthouse located in Bridgeport, Connecticut, as the ‘‘Brien McMahon Federal

Building’’.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

4 The United States courthouse located at 915 Lafay5 ette Boulevard in Bridgeport, Connecticut, shall be known

6 and designated as the ‘‘Brien McMahon Federal Build7 ing’’.

8 SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

9 Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document,

10 paper, or other record of the United States to the court-
2

•HR 3724 IH

1 house referred to in section 1 shall be deemed to be a ref2 erence to the ‘‘Brien McMahon Federal Building’’.

Æ
#### David Shichman et al., Appellants, v Arax Exerjian et al., Respondents, et al., Defendant.

In an action to recover damages, *inter alia,*for breach of indemnity contracts and for breach of warranty, the plaintiffs appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Brucia, J.), entered November 16, 1989, as dismissed the cause of action for indemnification as asserted against all of the defendants except Tompkins & Tompkins, and which dismissed the complaint insofar as asserted against Arax Exerjian only in her capacity as custodian for Eugene Exerjian under the Florida Gifts to Minors Act, and against Henry Exerjian, Zepure Andreasian, Theodore Andreasian, Peter Andreasian and Marguerite Andreasian.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs, for reasons stated by Justice Brucia at the Supreme Court. Lawrence, J. P., Harwood, Rosenblatt and O’Brien, JJ., concur.
#### Arthur C. POTTORFF, Appellant, v. Ann Claire POTTORFF, Appellee.

No. 70-394.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Dec. 22, 1970.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
In The

Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana

No. 06-16-00077-CV

IN RE COMMITMENT OF BILLY DEAN PRICE

On Appeal from the 336th District Court

Fannin County, Texas

Trial Court No. CV-16-42488

Before Morriss, C.J., Moseley and Burgess, JJ.
2

O R D E R

Our review of the clerk’s record in this case indicates that it contains “sensitive data” as 

that phrase is defined in Rule 9.10 of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. See TEX. R. APP. 

P. 9.10(a). Sensitive data includes “a driver’s license number, passport number, social security 

number, tax identification number or similar government-issued personal identification number.” 

TEX. R. APP. P. 9.10(a)(1). The clerk’s record contains the appellant’s social security number. 

Rule 9.10(b) states, “Unless a court orders otherwise, an electronic or paper filing with the court, 

including the contents of any appendices, must not contain sensitive data.” TEX.R. APP. P. 9.10(b).

Rule 9.10(g) provides, “A court may also order that a document be filed under seal in paper 

form or electronic form, without redaction.” TEX. R. APP. P. 9.10(g). Therefore, because the 

clerk’s record contains sensitive data, we order the clerk of this Court or her appointee, in 

accordance with Rule 9.10(g), to seal the electronically filed clerk’s record in this case.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

BY THE COURT

Date: April 26, 2017
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 16

- 50230 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff

- Appellee

v.

BRENDA ELIZABETH LONGORIA ,
Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 2:09

- CR

- 121

- 2

Before D ENNIS, PRADO, and OWEN, Circuit Judges

. PER CURIAM: *
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Brenda Elizabeth Longoria has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance
with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Longoria h a s not filed a r esponse. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED December 20 , 2016 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 16-50230 Document: 00513804555 Page: 1 Date Filed: 12/20/2016No. 16

- 50230

2 issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to with draw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the
APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR

. R. 42.2. Case: 16-50230 Document: 00513804555 Page: 2 Date Filed: 12/20/2016
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Radiation Therapy Services Holdings, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2011 (the “Report”), I, Kerrin E. Gillespie, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)           The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)           The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

A signed original of this written certification required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

 
| /s/ KERRIN E. GILLESPIE                             |   |
|-----------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                                                |   |
| Kerrin   E. Gillespie                               |   |
| Senior   Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |   |
| (principal   financial officer)                     |   |
| May 13,   2011                                 |   |

 

----
#### Debra B. McSheffrey, Respondent-Appellant, v N. Pierre Helou, Appellant-Respondent.

In an action to recover damages for medical malpractice, the defendant appeals from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Lockman, J.), dated October 10, 1989, as denied his motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, and the plaintiff cross-appeals from so much of the same order as denied her cross motion to dismiss the first affirmative defense set forth in the defendant’s verified answer, which asserts the bar of the Statute of Limitations.

Ordered that the order is modified, on the law, the defendant’s motion is granted, and the complaint is dismissed; as so modified, the order is affirmed, with costs to the defendant.

Contrary to the plaintiff’s contentions, we find that the continuous treatment doctrine did not toll her claim beyond the date of her letter which effectively discharged the defen*729dant as her treating physician, to wit, November 11, 1985. The determination as to whether continuous treatment exists must focus on the patient *(see, Rizk v Cohen,*73 NY2d 98; *Edmonds v Getchonis,*150 AD2d 879), and the record at bar is devoid of any objective evidence to demonstrate that after November 11, 1985, the plaintiff retained the "continuous trust and confidence” which underlies the continuous treatment doctrine *(see, Richardson v Orentreich,*64 NY2d 896; *De Peralta v Presbyterian Hosp.,*121 AD2d 346). Accordingly, although the plaintiff's summons and complaint was served on the Nassau County Sheriff on May 13, 1988, the action is time-barred by the applicable Statute of Limitations, and must be dismissed *(see,*CPLR 214-a). Sullivan, J. P., Eiber, Rosenblatt and Ritter, JJ., concur.