### 19920 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 73 / Friday, April 16, 2010 / Proposed Rules

Accordingly, we propose to amend 9 CFR part 94 as follows:

**PART 94—RINDERPEST, FOOT-AND MOUTH DISEASE, EXOTIC**  **NEWCASTLE DISEASE, AFRICAN SWINE FEVER, CLASSICAL SWINE**  **FEVER, SWINE VESICULAR DISEASE, AND BOVINE SPONGIFORM**  **ENCEPHALOPATHY: PROHIBITED AND RESTRICTED IMPORTATIONS** 

1. The authority citation for part 94 continues to read as follows:

Authority: 7 U.S.C. 450, 7701-7772, 7781- 7786, and 8301-8317; 21 U.S.C. 136 and 136a; 31 U.S.C. 9701; 7 CFR 2.22, 2.80, and
371.4.
**§ 94.1 [Amended]**

2. In § 94.1, paragraph (a)(2) is amended by adding the words ‘‘the Brazilian State of Santa Catarina, ’’ after the word ‘‘ Bermuda, ’’

. **§ 94.8 [Amended]**

3. In § 94.8, the introductory text is amended by adding the words ‘‘ (except the State of Santa Catarina) ’’ after the word ‘‘ Brazil ’’

. **§ 94.9 [Amended]**

4. In § 94.9, paragraph (a) is amended by adding the words ‘‘the Brazilian State of Santa Catarina; ’’ after the word

‘‘ Australia; ’’

. **§ 94.10 [Amended]**

5. In § 94.10, paragraph (a) is amended by adding the words ‘‘the Brazilian State of Santa Catarina; ’’ after the word ‘‘ Australia; ’’

. **§ 94.11 [Amended]**

6. In § 94.11, paragraph (a) is amended by adding the words ‘‘the Brazilian State of Santa Catarina, ’’ after the word ‘‘ Belgium, ’’

. **§ 94.12 [Amended]**

7. In § 94.12, paragraph (a) is amended by adding the words ‘‘the Brazilian State of Santa Catarina; ’’ after the word ‘‘ Belgium, ’’

.

Done in Washington, DC, this 12 th day of April 2010.
Cindy Smith Administrator, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service. [FR Doc. 2010–8765 Filed 4–15–10: 8:45 am]

**BILLING CODE 3410–34–S DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND**  **URBAN DEVELOPMENT**

**24 CFR Part 1000**
**[Docket No. FR–5275–N–08]**
**Native American Housing Assistance and Self-Determination**  **Reauthorization Act of 2008: Negotiated Rulemaking Committee**  **Meeting**

**AGENCY :**  Office of the Assistant Secretary for Public and Indian Housing, HUD.

**ACTION :**  Notice of negotiated rulemaking committee meeting.

**SUMMARY :**  This document announces a meeting of the negotiated rulemaking committee that was established pursuant to the Native AmericanHousing Assistance and SelfDetermination Reauthorization Act of 2008. The primary purpose of the committee is to discuss and negotiate a proposed rule that would change the regulations for the Indian Housing Block Grant (IHBG) program and the Title VI Loan Guarantee program.

**DATES :**  The committee meeting will be held on Tuesday, May 11, 2010, Wednesday, May 12, and Thursday, May 13, 2010. On all three days the meeting will begin at 8 a.m. and is scheduled to end at 5 p.m.

**ADDRESSES :**  The meeting will take place at the Westin Westminster Hotel, 10600 Westminster Boulevard, Westminster, Colorado 80020; telephone number (303) 410–5000 (this is not a toll-free number).

**FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT :**  Rodger J. Boyd, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Native American Programs, Office of Public and Indian Housing, Department of Housing and Urban Development, 451 Seventh Street, SW., Room 4126, Washington, DC 20410; telephone number 202–401–7914 (this is not a toll-free number). Hearing or speech-impaired individuals may access this number via TTY by calling the toll-free Federal Information Relay Service at 1–800–877–8339.

**SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION :**  I. Background

The Native American Housing Assistance and Self-Determination Reauthorization Act of 2008 (Pub. L. 110–411, approved October 14, 2008) (NAHASDA Reauthorization) reauthorizes The Native AmericanHousing Assistance and SelfDetermination Act of 1996 (25 U.S.C.
4101 et seq. ) (NAHASDA) through September 30, 2013, and makes a number of amendments to the statutory requirements governing the Indian Housing Block Grant Program (IHBG) and Title VI Loan Guarantee programs. For more information on the IHBG and Title VI of NAHASDA, please see the background section of the Notice of Negotiated Rulemaking Committee Meeting published on February 22, 2010 at (75 FR 7579). The NAHASDA Reauthorization amends section 106 of NAHASDA to provide that HUD shall initiate a negotiated rulemaking in order to implement aspects of the 2008 Reauthorization Act that require rulemaking. On January 5, 2010 (75 FR 423), HUD published a Federal Register notice announcing the final list of members of the negotiated rulemaking committee (the Native AmericanHousing Assistance & SelfDetermination Negotiated Rulemaking Committee). II. Negotiated Rulemaking Committee Meeting

This document announces the third meeting of the Native AmericanHousing Assistance & SelfDetermination Negotiated Rulemaking Committee. The committee meeting will take place as described in the **DATES** and
**ADDRESSES** sections of this document. The meeting will be open to the public without advance registration. Public attendance may be limited to the space available. Members of the public may be allowed to make statements during the meeting, to the extent time permits, and to file written statements with the committee for its consideration. Written statements should be submitted to the address listed in the **FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT**  section of this document.

Dated: April 9, 2010. Deborah Hernandez, General Deputy Assistant Secretary for Public and Indian Housing.
[FR Doc. 2010–8665 Filed 4–15–10; 8:45 am]

**BILLING CODE 4210–67–P**

**ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY** 

**40 CFR Part 52**
**[EPA–R08–OAR–2009–0052; FRL–9136–5]**
**Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans;**  **Wyoming; Revisions to the Wyoming Air Quality Standards and Regulations** 

**AGENCY :**  Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

**ACTION :**  Proposed rule.


### 19921 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 73 / Friday, April 16, 2010 / Proposed Rules

**SUMMARY :**  EPA is proposing to approve two State Implementation Plan (SIP) revisions submitted by the State of Wyoming on September 11, 2008. Wyoming has revised its Air Quality Standards and Regulations, specifically Chapter 1, Section 5, Unavoidable equipment malfunction, and Chapter 1, Section 6, Credible evidence. EPA is taking this action under section 110 of the Clean Air Act. In the ‘‘ Rules and Regulations ’’ section of this Federal Register, EPA is approving the State’s SIP revision as a direct final rule without prior proposal because the Agency views this as a noncontroversial SIP revision and anticipates no adverse comments. A detailed rationale for the approval is set forth in the preamble to the direct final rule. If EPA receives no adverse comments, EPA will not take further action on this proposed rule. If EPA receives adverse comments, EPA will withdraw the direct final rule and it will not take effect. EPA will address all public comments in a subsequent final rule based on this proposed rule. EPA will not institute a second comment period on this action. Any parties interested in commenting must do so at this time. Please note that if EPA receives adverse comment on an amendment, paragraph, or section of this rule and if that provision may be severed from the remainder of the rule, EPA may adopt as final those provisions of the rule that are not the subject of an adverse comment.

**DATES :**  Written comments must be received on or before May 17, 2010.

**ADDRESSES :**  Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R08– OAR–2009–0052, by one of the following methods:

• http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the on-line instructions for submitting
comments.

• E-mail: dolan.kathy@epa.gov.

• Fax: (303) 312–6064 (please alert the individual listed in the **FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT**  if you are faxing comments).

• Mail: Director, Air Program, Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), Region 8, Mailcode 8P–AR, 1595 Wynkoop Street, Denver, Colorado
80202–1129.

• Hand Delivery: Director, Air Program, Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), Region 8, Mailcode 8P– AR, 1595 Wynkoop Street, Denver, Colorado 80202–1129. Such deliveries are only accepted Monday through Friday, 8 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., excluding Federal holidays. Special arrangements should be made for deliveries of boxed information.

Please see the direct final rule which is located in the Rules Section of this Federal Register for detailed instruction on how to submit comments.

**FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT :**  Kathy Dolan, Air Program, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), Region 8, Mailcode 8P–AR, 1595 Wynkoop Street, Denver, Colorado 80202–1129. 303–312–6142, dolan.kathy@epa.gov.

**SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION :**  See the information provided in the Direct Final action of the same title which is located in the Rules and Regulations Section of this Federal Register

.

Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq. Dated: April 1, 2010. Carol L. Campbell, Acting Deputy Regional Administrator, Region 8. [FR Doc. 2010–8404 Filed 4–15–10; 8:45 am]

**BILLING CODE 6560–50–P**

**ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY** 

**40 CFR Part 52**
**[EPA–R09–OAR–2010–0277; FRL–9137–9]**

**Revisions to the Arizona State Implementation Plan** 

**AGENCY :**  Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

**ACTION :**  Proposed rule.

**SUMMARY :**  EPA is proposing to approve revisions to the Maricopa County Air Quality Department (MCAQD) portion of the Arizona State Implementation Plan (SIP). These revisions concern opacity standards related to multiple pollutants, including particulate matter (PM) emissions from several different types of sources, ranging from fugitive dust to diesel generators. We are approving a local rule that regulates these emission sources under the Clean Air Act as amended in 1990 (CAA or the Act). We are taking comments on this proposal and plan to follow with a final action.

**DATES :**  Any comments must arrive by May 17, 2010.
**ADDRESSES :**  Submit comments, identified by docket number [EPA–R09– OAR–2010–0277], by one of the following methods:

• Federal eRulemaking Portal: http:// www.regulations.gov. Follow the on-line instructions.

• E-mail: steckel.andrew@epa.gov

.
• Mail or deliver: Andrew Steckel (Air-4), U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Region IX, 75 Hawthorne Street, San Francisco, CA 94105–3901.

Instructions: All comments will be included in the public docket without change and may be made available online at http://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information provided, unless the comment includes Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Information that you consider CBI or otherwise protected should be clearly identified as such and should not be submitted through http://www.regulations.gov or e-mail. http://www.regulations.gov is an

‘‘ anonymous access ’’ system, and EPA will not know your identity or contact information unless you provide it in thebody of your comment. If you send email directly to EPA, your e-mail address will be automatically captured and included as part of the public comment. If EPA cannot read your comment due to technical difficulties and cannot contact you for clarification, EPA may not be able to consider your
comment.

Docket: The index to the docket for this action is available electronically at http://www.regulations.gov and in hard copy at EPA Region IX, 75 Hawthorne Street, San Francisco, California. While all documents in the docket are listed in the index, some information may be publicly available only at the hard copy location ( e.g., copyrighted material), and some may not be publicly available in either location ( e.g., CBI). To inspect the hard copy materials, please schedule an appointment during normal business hours with the contact listed in the **FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT**  section.

**FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT :**  Joanne Wells, EPA Region IX, (415) 947–4118, wells.joanne@epa.gov

.
**SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION :**  Throughout this document, ‘‘we, ’’ ‘‘us ’’ and ‘‘ our’’ refer to EPA.

Table of Contents

I. The State’s Submittal

A. What rule did the State submit? B. Are there other versions of this rule? C. What is the purpose of the submitted

rule revision? II. EPA’s Evaluation and Action

A. How is EPA evaluating the rule? B. Does the rule meet the evaluation

criteria? C. EPA Recommendations to Further

Improve the Rule D. Public Comment and Final Action III. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
I. The State’s Submittal

A. What rule did the State submit?

Table 1 lists the rule addressed by this proposal with the date that it was adopted by the local air agency and submitted by the Arizona Department of Environmental Quality (ADEQ).