alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
40CFR302.6 Notification requirements

Johnson, Alyssa LT 

to:

Lynn Beasley

12/16/2010 01:53 PM

Sent by:

Alyssa.M.Johnson@uscg.mil

Show Details

History: This message has been replied to and forwarded.

Good Afternoon Ms. Beasley,

Your name was listed as the point of contact for the most recent 

regulation update to 40 CFR 302. Please let me know if you are no longer 

responsible for updating this regulation. Recently, it was brought to my 

attention that the contact information for the NRC listed in 40CFR302.6 

is incorrect. The correct NRC contact information is 1-800-424-8802, 

local phone number 202-267-2675, and fax number 202-267-1322. We do not 

maintain a telefax, and the following phone numbers have been

disconnected 202-425-2675 and 202-267-2675 (listed fax number). 

Please let me know appropriate how long it will take to update the 

regulations.

Thx,

Alyssa 

LT Alyssa Johnson

National Response Center

COMDT CG-5335

Operations Officer

Phone: 202-372-2432/1-800-424-8802

Fax: 202-267-1322
| 1.   | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|----------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2.   | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the consolidated financial condition of the Company as of the dates presented and the consolidated result of operations of the Company for the periods presented. |
|----------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   By: |   /s/ Kade Thompson                                              |
|-----------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|  Name:     |  Kade Thompson                                                        |
|  Title:    |  Principal Executive Officer,Principal Financial Officer and Director |
|  Date:     |  May 16, 2011                                                         |
exh_102.htm


EXHIBIT 10.2


 



	Yong Sun 	September 30, 2013





Boston, MA







Dear Yong;







I am pleased to make you a tentative offer of employment for the position of Vice President Global Strategic Marketing and Business Development for Harvard Bioscience, Inc. This position will report directly to me. Your weekly salary will be $4,326.92, paid as earned and which is the yearly equivalent of $225,000.00. In addition to base salary, you will be given 100,000 stock options that vest in equal installments over four years from the initial grant date. The initial grant date will be the eleventh trading day after the HART spinoff and the strike price will be the average of the ten preceding trading days. You are eligible for an annual bonus up to 35% of base salary upon attainment of goals set by the CEO. Your employment will begin on October 28, 2013 or sooner if you are able. A signing bonus of $25,000.00 will be paid to you after 45 days of employment. Please note this offer is contingent on a review of the results of a background screening and a drug test.







Harvard Bioscience offers a competitive benefits package including major medical, dental, vision, life insurance and a retirement plan with company match. You will also earn three weeks of vacation and six personal days. Additional details on our benefit offerings will be provided on acceptance of this offer.







As is standard with positions such as this, you must sign an agreement to protect and hold confidential all proprietary and confidential information regarding Harvard Bioscience, any of its affiliates, its customers and employees both during and after the period of your employment. You must also acknowledge that any inventions, discoveries, processes and/or improvements developed by you in the course of your employment or in any way resulting from your employment with us remain the property of the Company exclusively.







All offers of employment are on an at-will basis which means that either you or we may terminate our employment relationship at any time with or without cause.







Yong, we are excited by the prospect of you joining us. Based on you practical and relevant experience, we believe you will bring much needed strategic marketing skills to the organization. Please acknowledge your acceptance of this tentative offer of employment by signing and returning a copy of this letter to me. At that point, Frank Aubuchon will provide you with the necessary paperwork for completing your background check and drug screening.


 



	/s/ Jeffrey A. Duchemin, CEO	9/30/13	 	/s/ Yong Sun	9/30/13	 
	Jeffrey A. Duchemin, CEO 	Date	 	Yong Sun	Date	 





 







84 October Hill Road • Holliston, Massachusetts 01746-1388


Phone: 508-893-8999 • Fax: 508-429-5732


www.harvardapparatus.com • www.harvardbioscience.com
~9715702.txt

-----Forwarded by Melanie King/RTP/USEPA/US on 02/15/2010 09:13PM -----

To: Cortney_Higgins@omb.eop.gov 

From: Melanie King/RTP/USEPA/US 

Date: 02/04/2010 04:16PM 

Subject: memo on area source inventory 

(See attached file: Analysis of engines included in area source subcategory 

1-5-10.doc) 

Melanie King 

Energy Strategies Group 

Sector Policies and Programs Division 

Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards 

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 

Mail Code D243-01 

RTP, NC 27711 

Phone: (919) 541-2469 

Fax: (919) 541-5450 

king.melanie@epa.gov 

Page 1
U.S. flag
              An official website of the United States government Skip to main content   end of header Census.gov Newsroom Releases Income & Wealth
 Newsroom Archive
 Skip left menu navigation
 About the Newsroom
 				Facts for Features
 				**News Releases**
 				Press Kits
 				Tip Sheets
 Release Information CB11-TPS.11 **Contact:**
 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:  THURSDAY, APRIL 7, 2011 Dynamics of Economic Well-Being: Fluctuations in the U.S. Income Distribution: 2004-2007 This report divides the nation's 106 million households into quintiles of 
21.3 million based on income and compares their characteristics and their movements between and within the quintiles. Using data from the Survey of Income and Program Participation (SIPP), the report traces the changing income levels of a representative sample of U.S. residents over a 48-month period (February 2004 to January 2008). These households were interviewed every four months over this time. Internet address: <https://www.census.gov/prod/2011pubs/p70-124.pdf>. [PDF] **No news release associated with this report. Tip Sheet only.**
 
 CONNECT WITH US

Information Quality
                    Data Linkage Infrastructure
                    Data Protection and Privacy Policy
                    Accessibility      
                    FOIA
                    Inspector General
                    No FEAR Act
                    U.S. Department of Commerce
                    USA.gov
                   Measuring America's People, Places, and Economy
Abatement Order filed June 27, 2019

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________ NO. 14

- 19

- 00297

- CR

____________ MICHAEL WAYNE BUNT ING , Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

On Appeal from the 212th District Court Galveston County, Texa s Trial Court Cause No. 17

- CR

- 3339



### ABATEMENT ORDER

Appellant is represented by appointed counsel on appeal, Kenneth Florence

. On June 24, 2019 , counsel filed a motion to withdraw as appellate counsel because he accepted an offer of employment with the Je fferson County Criminal District Attorney’s Office. Accordingly, we enter the following order.
We ORDER the judge of the 212th District Court to consider counsel ’ s request to withdraw. If current counsel is permitted to withdraw, the judge shall appoint new appellate counsel for appellant. The judge shall see that a record of any hearing is made and shall order the trial clerk to forward a record of the hearing and a supplemental clerk ’ s record containing any orders permitting counselto withdraw and appo inting new counsel. Those records shall be filed with the

clerk of this court within 30 days of the date of this order.
The appeal is abated, treated as a closed case, and removed from this c ourt ’ s active docket. The app eal will be reinstated on this c ourt ’ s active docket when the
trial court ’ s findings and recommendations are filed in this c ourt.

PER CURIAM

Panel Consists of Justices Wise, Jewell, and Hassan.
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pane l unani m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l ar g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T P AV E L DO UD R E NO V, P et i t i on er , v. E R I C H . H O L D E R , J r ., A tto rn e yG e n e r a l, R e s p o n d e n t. N o. 09- 72660 A ge nc yN o. A 079- 244- 994 ME MOR AN DU M *

O n P e t i t i on f

orR e vi e w of

an O r de rof

the B o ar do f I m m ig r a tio n A p p e a ls S ubm i tt e d M ay24, 2011 ** B efo re: P R E G E R S O N , T H O M A S , an dP A E Z , C i rcu i tJu d g es. P a ve l D oudr e nov, ana t i ve and c i t i z e n of B ul gar i a , pe t i t i ons f

orr e vi e w of th e B o ar do f I m m ig ra ti o n A p p ea ls’ su m m ary a ff irm an ce o f a n im m ig ra ti o n ju d g e’s ( “ I J ” ) de c i s i on de ny i ng hi s m ot i on t o r e ope n pr oc e e di ngs he l d i n abs e nt i a . O ur j ur i s di c t i on i s gove rne d by8 U . S . C . § 1252. W e r e vi e w f orabus e of

di s c r e t i on the 

# FI LED JU N 02 2011 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS09- 72660 2 de ni a l of am ot i on t o r e ope n, Si n gh v . I NS , 21 3 F . 3d 10 50 , 10 52 (9th C i r. 20 00 ), an dw e d e n yin p art an dd is m is s in p art th e p e titio n f o rr e v ie w . T h e I Jd idn o t ab u s e h is d is c r e tio n b yd e n y in g D o u d r e n o v ’s m o tio n to re op en as un t i m el y, w here the m ot i on w as fi l ed ov erse ven years af t er D o u d r e n o v ’s r e m o v a l o r d e r , se e 8 U .S .C . § 1 2 2 9 a ( c ) ( 7 ) , an dD o u d r e n o v f a ile dto a l l e ge tha the di d notr e c e i ve pr ope rnot i c e ortha thi s f a i l ur e t o appe ara tthe h e ar in g w a s th r o u g h n o f au lt o f h is o w n , se e 8 U .S .C . § 1 2 2 9 a ( b ) ( 5 ) ( C ) . T o th e e x te n t th a t D o u d r e n o v c h a lle n g e s th e I J ’s d e c is io n n o t to in v o k e its s uas pont e author i tyt o r e ope n pr oc e e di ngs , w e l a c k j ur i s di c t i on t o r e vi e w s uc h a c h a lle n g e . See Mej i a-H erna ndezv. H

older , 3 0 3 F .3 d1 1 5 3 , 8 2 3 - 2 4 ( 9 th C ir . 2 0 1 1 ) . P E T IT IO N F O R R E V IE W D E N IE D , i n p art; D IS M IS S E D , i n p art.
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4031 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4031

 To provide for the prosecution as adults of juveniles 13 years old or 
                 older for certain crimes of violence.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 15, 1994

 Mr. Schumer introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To provide for the prosecution as adults of juveniles 13 years old or 
                 older for certain crimes of violence.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Juvenile Prosecution Act of 1994''.

SEC. 2. PROSECUTION AS ADULTS OF CERTAIN JUVENILES FOR CRIMES OF 
              VIOLENCE.

    The 4th undesignated paragraph of section 5032 of title 18, United 
States Code, is amended by striking ``; however'' and inserting ``. In 
the application of the preceding sentence, if the crime of violence is 
an offense under section 113(a), 113(b), 113(c), 1111, 1113, or, if the 
juvenile possessed a firearm during the offense, section 2111, 2113, 
2241(a), or 2241(c) of this title, `thirteen' shall be substituted for 
`fifteen' and `thirteenth' shall be substituted for `fifteenth'. 
However''.

SEC. 3. COMMENCEMENT OF JUVENILE PROCEEDING.

    Section 5032 of title 18, United States Code, is amended by 
striking ``Any proceedings against a juvenile under this chapter or as 
an adult shall not be commenced until'' and inserting ``A juvenile 
shall not be transferred to adult prosecution nor shall a hearing be 
held under section 5037 (disposition after a finding of juvenile 
delinquency) until''.

SEC. 4. SEPARATION OF JUVENILE FROM ADULT OFFENDERS.

    Section 5039 of title 18, United States Code, is amended by 
inserting ``, whether pursuant to an adjudication of delinquency or 
conviction for an offense,'' after ``committed''.

                                 <all>
```
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### F LORIDA



### S ECOND 

### D ISTRICT

PATRICIA RUBIO and PAUL MacNEIL

,

Appellant s

,

v.

BENGAL PROPERTIES, INC.,

Appellee.

No. 2D 2 023

- 1328

May 24, 2024

Appeal from the C ounty Court for Hillsborough County; Joseph M.

Tompkins , Judge

.

Morgan L. Weinstein of Twig, Trade, & Tribunal, PLLC, Fort Lauderdale

, and Darren Newhart of Newhart Legal, PA, Loxahatchee, for Appellant s

.

Ian A. Parry, Jonathan B. Sbar, and Jodi L. Corrigan of Rocke, McLean &

Sbar, P.A., Tampa, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM

.

Affirmed.

NORTHCUTT , VILLANTI

, and RO THSTEIN

- YOUAKIM , JJ., Concur.

Opinion subject to revision prior publication.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 _________________________________________

 Clerk

September 26, 2012

p0919

Order 

September 26, 2012

144980

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 144980

COA: 308301

Livingston CC: 10-018734-FH

JEFFREY HOWARD KLAASSEN,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the March 9, 2012 order 

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded 

that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

MARILYN KELLY, J., would remand this case for resentencing.
N OTE : This disposition is nonprecedential. 

# United States Court of Appeals **for the Federal Circuit**

______________________ EWINWIN, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

GROUPON, INC., Defendant-Appellee.

____________________

2012-1165

______________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida in Case No. 10-CV-2678, Judge Susan C. Bucklew.

______________________
JUDGMENT

______________________

C OLBY B. S PRINGER , Lewis and Roca LLP, of Mountain View, California, argued for plaintiff-appellant. With him on the brief was B RENT W. R ASMUSSEN , of Phoenix, Arizona.

J. D AVID H ADDEN , Fenwick & West LLP, of Mountain View, California, argued for defendant-appellee. With him on the brief were R YAN J. M ARTON and E LIZABETH J. W HITE

.______________________

T HIS C AUSE having been heard and considered, it is

O RDERED and A DJUDGED :

P ER C URIAM (P ROST , M AYER , and M OORE , Circuit Judges ).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

E NTERED BY O RDER OF THE C OURT

October 9, 2012 /s/ Jan Horbaly Date Jan Horbaly Clerk
**Exhibit
      32.2**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report of Applied Digital
      Solutions, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ending December 31,
      2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
      (the “Report”), I, Evan C. McKeown, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
      certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.














/s/
      Evan C. McKeown


Evan
      C.
      McKeown


Chief
      Financial Officer


April
      6,
      2006







A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      Applied Digital Solutions, Inc. and will be retained by Applied Digital
      Solutions, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
      its
      staff upon request.
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 380

To amend the National Security Act of 1947 to require the congressional

intelligence committees to establish certain procedures to prevent the

unauthorized disclosure of information furnished to those committees.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JANUARY 5, 1993

Mr. SOLOMON introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence

A BILL

To amend the National Security Act of 1947 to require

the congressional intelligence committees to establish certain procedures to prevent the unauthorized disclosure

of information furnished to those committees.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. CONGRESSIONAL PROCEDURES TO PROTECT

4 INTELLIGENCE INFORMATION FROM UNAU5 THORIZED DISCLOSURE.

6 Section 501(d) of the National Security Act of 1947

7 (50 U.S.C. 413) is amended—

8 (1) by inserting ‘‘(1)’’after ‘‘(d)’’; and
2

•HR 380 IH

1 (2) by adding at the end the following:

2 ‘‘(2) The procedures established pursuant to para3 graph (1) shall ensure that any Member of Congress, and

4 any officer, staff member, or other employee of the Con5 gress, who gains access under this title to information de6 scribed in the first sentence of paragraph (1)—

7 ‘‘(A) is made subject to security procedures

8 that are comparable to those applicable to personnel

9 of the intelligence community;

10 ‘‘(B) is required to complete an appropriate

11 background investigation prior to becoming eligible

12 to receive such information under this title and regu13 larly thereafter as long as such eligibility continues;

14 ‘‘(C) is required to submit to periodic counter15 intelligence polygraph testing administered on a ran16 dom basis; and

17 ‘‘(D) is denied—

18 ‘‘(i) in the case of a Member of Con19 gress, continued access under this title to

20 such information, and

21 ‘‘(ii) in the case of an officer, staff

22 member, or other employee of the Con23 gress, continued employment by the Con24 gress,
3

•HR 380 IH

1 if that individual is found to have knowingly

2 disclosed, to anyone not authorized to receive it,

3 the substance of any such information obtained

4 through such access.’’.

Æ
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3880 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 3880

  To prohibit the Secretary of Health and Human Services from finding 
 that a State medicaid plan is not in compliance with title XIX of the 
Social Security Act solely on the grounds that the plan does not cover 
 abortions for pregnancies resulting from an act of rape or incest if 
      coverage for such abortions is inconsistent with State law.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 23, 1994

   Mr. Dickey (for himself, Mr. Dornan, Mr. Emerson, Mr. Bartlett of 
  Maryland, Mr. Bunning, Mr. Talent, Mr. Istook, Mr. Knollenberg, Mr. 
   Bachus of Alabama, Mr. Inglis of South Carolina, Mr. Solomon, Mr. 
  Armey, Mr. Linder, Mr. McCrery, Mr. Barton of Texas, Mr. Penny, Mr. 
Bereuter, Mr. Lipinski, and Mr. Boehner) introduced the following bill; 
       which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To prohibit the Secretary of Health and Human Services from finding 
 that a State medicaid plan is not in compliance with title XIX of the 
Social Security Act solely on the grounds that the plan does not cover 
 abortions for pregnancies resulting from an act of rape or incest if 
      coverage for such abortions is inconsistent with State law.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PROHIBITING FINDING OF NON-COMPLIANCE WITH MEDICAID 
              REQUIREMENTS BASED ON FAILURE OF STATE PLAN TO COVER 
              ABORTIONS FOR PREGNANCIES RESULTING FROM RAPE OR INCEST.

    (a) In General.--Notwithstanding any provision of title XIX of the 
Social Security Act (including section 1902(a)(10)(A) of such Act), the 
Secretary of Health and Human Services may not find that a State plan 
for medical assistance under such title fails to meet the requirements 
of such title for any quarter solely on the grounds that the State does 
not provide for coverage of an abortion under the State plan during the 
quarter for a pregnancy resulting from an act of rape or incest if 
coverage for such an abortion is inconsistent with State law.
    (b) Effective Date.--Subsection (a) shall apply to quarters 
beginning on or after October 1, 1993.

                                 <all>
```
# Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

July 25, 2018

No. 04

- 18

- 00406

- CR

Ryan Monroe JACKSON

, Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From th e 274th Judicial District Court, Guadalupe County, Texas

Trial Court No. 17

- 1657

- CR

- B

Honorable Gary L. Steel, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

Appellant’s motion for leave to file a late docketing statement is GRANTED.

__________ _______________________ Karen Angelini, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 25th day of July, 2018

.

___________ ________________________ K eith E. H ottle

Clerk of Court