alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.2



Certification of Principal Executive Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350

(Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)



I, Jeff Johnson, Chief Accounting Officer of Winning Edge International, Inc. (the "Registrant") do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge, based upon a review of the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended July 31, 2007 of the Registrant, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"):



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.







By:/s/



-----------------------------------



Jeff Johnson



Chief Accounting Officer



November 27, 2007



* A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Winning Edge International, Inc. and will be retained by Winning Edge International, Inc. and furnished to the Securities Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### Henry Earl ZEIGLER, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

No. 38159.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Feb. 19, 1969.

Henry Earl Zeigler, in pro. per.

Earl Faircloth, Atty. Gen., and Wallace E. Allbritton, Asst. Atty. Gen., for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

We issued a writ of habeas corpus to require a response to the petition which in some respects reflected prima facie merit. The return attaches reproductions of court records which effectively negate the claims which initially piqued our concerns. On the basis of the entire record now here it is clear that the petitioner is not entitled to the relief sought.

The writ is discharged.

ERVIN, C. J., and THORNAL, CARLTON, ADKINS and BOYD, JJ., concur.
#### Hugh R. COLEMAN v. LEE COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION and Leroy E. Belk, County Superintendent of Education.

No. 49942.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

June 14, 1978.

Rehearing Denied July 12, 1978.

Farese, Farese & Farese, Anthony T. Farese, Ashland, for appellant.

Carnathan & Davidson, Glen H. Davidson, Tupelo, for appellees.

Appeal from Chancery Court, Lee County; James E. Bost, Chancellor.

Before PATTERSON, C. J., and SUGG and WALKER, JJ.

Affirmed.

SMITH and ROBERTSON, P. JJ., and BROOM, LEE, BOWLING and COFER, JJ., concur.
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 164 (Thursday, August 23, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Page 42715]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-18225]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE


Product Change--Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail, & First-
Class Package Service Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal Service<SUP>TM</SUP>.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Date of required notice: August 23, 2018.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Elizabeth Reed, 202-268-3179.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
August 20, 2018, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a USPS 
Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail, & First-Class 
Package Service Contract 44 to Competitive Product List. Documents are 
available at www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2018-210, CP2018-292.

Elizabeth Reed,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2018-18225 Filed 8-22-18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

ROBERT KING, III,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 372 MAL 2022

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 20th day of December, 2022

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED

.
**Exhibit 32.02**

 

**CERTIFICATIONOF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. §1350,**

**ASADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the annual report on Form 10-Kof Intrado Inc. (the “Company”) for the period ended December 31, 2005, asfiled with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),the undersigned, Michael D. Dingman, Jr., Chief Financial Officer of theCompany, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

 

(1)   the Report fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)   the informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
|                      | /s/ Michael D. Dingman, Jr.                |   |
|---------------------------|-------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                      | Michael D. Dingman, Jr.                    |
|                      | Chief Financial Officer                         |
|                      | *(Principal Financial and  Accounting Officer)* |
|                      |
| Dated: March 7, 2006 |

 

----
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-00-00749-CR

Daniel Aguilar, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF CALDWELL COUNTY, 274TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NO. 00-097, HONORABLE JACK H. ROBISON, JUDGE PRESIDING

PER CURIAM

On October 20, 2000, Daniel Aguilar perfected this appeal from a judgment of

conviction for indecency with a child. On December 19, 2000, appellant filed a written waiver

of appeal signed by appellant, his attorney, and the trial judge. This document reflects a knowing

and voluntary waiver of the right to appeal. We construe this waiver as a withdrawal of the notice

of appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.2(a).

The appeal is dismissed.

Before Justices Kidd, B. A. Smith and Puryear

Dismissed on Appellant’s Motion

Filed: March 8, 2001

Do Not Publish
**UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY** NATIONAL VEHICLE AND FUEL EMISSIONS LABORATORY

2565 PLYMOUTH ROAD ANN ARBOR, MICHIGAN 48105 - 2498

**ME MORA**  **NDUM** SUBJECT: Heavy- Duty Hy brid Onboard Diagnostics FROM: Am y Kopin TO: The Docket DATE: July 21 , 2011 

### On June 8 th, 2011 we held a conference call with BAE to discuss concerns raised by BAE regarding heavy - duty onboard diagno stic (OBD) requirements and timing. Specifically , they have requested a delay

of the application of HD OBD requirements for hy brid applications until 2020. C oncerns were raised during the comment period for the heavy - duty greenhouse gas notice of propose d rulemaking that heavy- duty hy brid applications may

not be able to meet the 2013 heavy - duty

OBD regulations that were published in the 2009 OBD Final Rulemaking . 1 , 2 

### Attendees from the EPA included Cleophas Jackson, Anthony Neam, and Amy

Kopin. Tom Apale nek attended from BAE.

1 U.S. EPA, NHTSA, and DOT, “Greenhouse Gas Emission Standards and Fuel Efficiency Standards for Medium and Heavy - Duty Engines and Vehicles,” republished December 29, 2010. Available here: http://origin.www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR - 2 010 - 12 - 29/html/2010 - 32726.htm 2 U.S. EPA, “Control of Air Pollution from New Motor Vehicles and New Motor Vehicles Engines; Final Rule Regulations Requiring Onboard Diagnostic Systems on 2010 and Later Heavy - Duty Engines Used in Highway Applications Over 1 4,000 Pounds; Revisions to Onboard Diagnostic Requirements for Diesel Highway Heavy - Duty Vehicles Under 14,000 Pounds ,” published February 24, 2009. Available here: http://www.epa.gov/otaq/regs/im/obd/regtech/hd - obd - frm - 02 - 24 - 09 - notice - 74 - fr - 8310.pdf OFFICE OF AIR AND RADIATION
Unassociated Document


 



Exhibit 10.33


 


AMENDMENT TO


DIGITAL CINEMA DESTINATIONS CORP.


2012 STOCK OPTION AND INCENTIVE PLAN







A.           Digital Cinema Destinations Corp., (the “Company”) maintains the 2012 Stock Option and Incentive Plan (the “Plan”) for the benefit of eligible participants;


 


B.           In accordance with Section 9.e of the Plan, the Company has the right to amend the Plan.


 


C.           The Company wishes to amend the Plan, effective February 18, 2014 to increase the number of Shares available for issuance under the Plan by adding 150,000 Shares to the Plan.


 


NOW THEREFORE, the Plan is hereby amended as follows:


 


Section 3.a of the Plan is hereby amended in its entirety by substituting the following:







3. Stock Available for Awards







a. Number of Shares. Subject to adjustment under Section 3(c), the aggregate number of shares of Class A common stock of the Company (the “Common Stock”) that may be issued pursuant to the Plan is 550,000 shares of Class A common stock. If any Award expires, or is terminated, surrendered or forfeited, in whole or in part, the unissued Common Stock covered by such Award shall again be available for the grant of Awards under the Plan. If shares of Common Stock issued pursuant to the Plan are repurchased by, or are surrendered or forfeited to, the Company at no more than cost, such shares of Common Stock shall again be available for the grant of Awards under the Plan. Shares issued under the Plan may consist in whole or in part of authorized but unissued shares or treasury shares.







IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Amendment is hereby executed on February 18, 2014.


 



	  	
DIGITAL CINEMA DESTINATIONS CORP.

	  
	  	  	  	  
	  	
By:

	
 /s/ Brian Pflug

	  
	  	  	
Brian Pflug


Chief Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                           4,146
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,433
<ALLOWANCES>                                        57
<INVENTORY>                                        395
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 7,341
<PP&E>                                          77,436
<DEPRECIATION>                                   4,700
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  95,697
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           14,159
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           114
<OTHER-SE>                                      41,088
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    95,697
<SALES>                                         36,918
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                36,918
<CGS>                                           22,989
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   22,989
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 8,542
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,682
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,886
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,183
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,703
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,703
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .15
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4064 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4064

  To amend the Job Training Partnership Act to provide counseling and 
  guidance relating to postsecondary education options for dislocated 
                                workers.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 17, 1994

 Mr. Johnston of Florida (for himself, Mr. Murphy, Mr. Martinez, Mrs. 
   Unsoeld, Mr. Gene Green of Texas, and Ms. Woolsey) introduced the 
 following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Education and 
                                 Labor

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend the Job Training Partnership Act to provide counseling and 
  guidance relating to postsecondary education options for dislocated 
                                workers.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. AMENDMENT TO JOB TRAINING PARTNERSHIP ACT TO PROVIDE 
              COUNSELING AND GUIDANCE ON POSTSECONDARY EDUCATION 
              OPTIONS FOR DISLOCATED WORKERS.

    Section 314 of the Job Training Partnership Act is amended--
            (1) in subsection (a)--
                    (A) in the matter preceding paragraph (1), by 
                striking ``Funds'' and inserting ``(1) Funds'';
                    (B) by redesignating paragraphs (1) through (5) as 
                subparagraphs (A) through (E), respectively; and
                    (C) by adding at the end the following new 
                paragraph:
    ``(2) Funds allotted under section 302 shall be used to provide 
counseling and guidance relating to postsecondary education options in 
accordance with subsection (g).'';
            (2) by redesignating subsections (g) and (h) as subsection 
        (h) and (i), respectively; and
            (3) by inserting after subsection (f) the following new 
        subsection:
    ``(g) Counseling and Guidance on Postsecondary Education Options.--
Funds allotted under section 302 shall be used to provide counseling 
and guidance relating to postsecondary education options for eligible 
dislocated workers, including information on public and private 
programs of student financial assistance available to such workers for 
such education.''.

                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 32.01   CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002   In connection with the Quarterly Report of Norman Cay Development, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending July 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Shelley Guidarelli, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.   /s/ Shelley Guidarelli By: Shelley Guidarelli Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer  Dated: September 14, 2011     A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Finance and Accounting Service Providing payment services for the U.S. Department of Defense

Search
Search

Search

              - 
              - 
              - 
              - 
              - 

-  Military Member		 
-  Retired Military & Annuitant		 
-  Civilian Employee		 
-  Contractor & Vendor		 

Homemilitaryseparations

                        - How to Avoid Debt
                        - How to update your myPay account before separating
                        - When will I get my final pay?
                        - How to get your W2

### **Final Pay and Debt**

Wondering why you haven't received your final pay? The timeline varies based on your service and specific situation. For questions about what you'll be paid and when you'll get it, go to your separating office first.

Before you receive your final pay your finance, or administrative, office audits your pay account. If your finance office finds debts ***of any amount*** on your pay account – it can take up to 120 days or more to get your final check.  Even small debts that are less than your final pay amount can delay your pay.

Examples of common small debts:
                        - Tuition debts
                        - Travel overpayments
                        - Property loss debts that you haven’t settled
                        - Small pay adjustment debts

No matter what your particular situation, getting educated about your service’s procedures for separation will help you avoid debt. For more specific service information, view your service page. 

### Stay Connected

Department of Defense     Department of Veterans Affairs     Military Employment Verification     Warrior Care Website     Defense Contract Mgmt Agency  DoD Forms     Department of State     Civilian Personnel Mgmt Service     DTS Travel Center     System for Award Mgmt (SAM)    Congressional/LegislationPersonnel Force Innovation     Freedom of Information Act     DFAS Hotline   Contact Us     Accessibility / Section 508    EEO / No Fear Act  

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE 

AIR UNIVERSITY (AETC) 

9 September 2015 

MEMORANDUM FOR U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

Docket Operations, M-30 

West Building Ground Floor, Room Wl2-140 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE 

Washington, DC 20590 

FROM: COMMUNITY COLLEGE OF THE AIR FORCE 

CCAF/DEAL 

100 South Turner Boulevard 

Maxwell AFB, Gunter Annex, AL 36114-3011 

SUBJECT: Renewal ofExemption 

1. Reference to Exemption Number 10411A, Regulatory Docket Number FAA-2001-8750 (Originally 

Regulatory Docket Number 27429), Petition of Community College of the Air Force for an 

Exemption from§ 147.31 (c) (2) (iii) of the Federal Aviation Regulation; relief was granted in the 

public interest since Community College of the Air Force curriculum conforms to the guidelines of 

FAA Advisory Circular 147-4. The granted exemption permits U.S. Air Force aviation maintenance 

technicians who have completed military aviation maintenance education and training courses to be 

evaluated using the same criteria that are used for the civilian sector. 

2. The Community College of the Air Force shares regional aqcreditatioJ;l,with Air University by the 

Commission on Colleges of the Southern Association of CoJleges and. Schools (SACS). The 

Community College of the Air Force awards nine As~ociate in Appl~ecl'.Sei,en~e d~grees relevant to 

aviation maintenance disciplines and 59 other degrees designe(ffor specific Air Force occupational 

specialties. 

3. The exemption granted to the Community College of the Air Force on 6 January 2014 expires on 28 

February 2016. Since relief from§ 147.31 (c) (2) (iii) is still in the public interest and does not 

adversely affect safety, and since the reason and facts described in the original exemption remain 

unchanged, request the exemption be continued. 

4. Thank you for your time and consideration concerning this matter. If you have any questions or need 

further information, please contact me at (334) 649-5120 or email jason.smith.182@us.af.mil. 

' ····· '. \ , .. _ 

;;: 

. ' 

\: '\: .' ~ \ . \ -~ . '' . l ' 

(: ~ • • : •• './ ;, • \ I )• • • < 

. '. ,J,, 

, .. '. \,. 

.,., 

'. 

:, t. <: .( ·' . ·! ~- ' • : 

'i. 

· .. !'. 

.· . H, GS-12, DAF . 

. , .. #~ctor.,, G~~de,ntialing .Progr~ms and 

.,Co,.C~~ir-<JSAMTCC '. . _ . 

.. ·, .. 

, .. · '.· 

••· 1 

I > 

'L I 

·'; 

i i
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.



## United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

2008-1257, 2009-1317

(Reexamination No. 90/007,327)

IN RE SAMI CHEMICALS AND EXTRACTS, LTD.

Richard J. Berman , Arent Fox LLP, of Washingt on, DC, argued for appellant.

With him on the brief were Janine A. Carlan and Amy E.L. Schoenhard

.

Frances M. Lynch , Associate Solicitor, Office of the Solicitor, United States

Patent and Trademark Office, of Arlington, Virginia, argued fo r the Director of the United

States Patent and Trademark Office. With her on the brief were Raymond T. Chen

, Solicitor, and Thomas W. Krause , Associate Solicitor.

Appealed from: United States Patent and Trademark Office

Board of Patent Appeals and InterferencesNOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.



## United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

2008-1257, 2009-1317

(Reexamination No. 90/007, 327)

IN RE SAMI CHEMICALS AND EXTRACTS, LTD.



## Judgment

ON APPEAL from the United Stat es Patent and Trademark Office

Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences.

in CASE NO(S). 90/007,327

This CAUSE having been hear d and considered, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

Per Curiam (NEWMAN, LOURIE, and GAJARSA, Circuit Judges ).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

DATED February 19, 2010 /s/ Jan Horbaly

Jan Horbaly, Clerk
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________ No. 1D 18

- 4794

_____________________________ G EORGE W ALKER IV , Petitioner ,

v. S TATE OF F LORIDA , Respondent

.

_____________________________

Petition for Belated Appeal

— Origi nal Jurisdiction

.
January 28, 2019

P ER C URIAM

. The petition for belated appeal is denied on the merits.
M AKAR , W INOKUR , and M.K. T HOMAS , JJ., concur
.

_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion und er Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331
.

_____________________________
George Walker IV, pro se , Petitioner

.2 Ashley B

. Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee , for Respondent

.