alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
SEI-EX10.22_2013.12.31-K






EXHIBIT 10.22


FIRST AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT


WHEREAS, Seitel, Inc., a Delaware corporation (together with its successor and assigns, the "Company") and Robert D. Monson (the "Executive") have entered in an employment agreement dated January 30, 2007 (the "Agreement"); and


WHEREAS, Executive's Base Salary on April 30, 2009 is $630,000; and


WHEREAS, effective May 1, 2009 Executive has voluntarily determined to reduce his Base Salary as in effect on  April 30, 2009 by 10% through December 31, 2009, and after December 31, 2009 his Base Salary shall return to the annual amount as in effect on April 30, 2009; and


WHEREAS, the Company and Executive acknowledge that such a voluntary reduction in Executive's Base Salary by Executive is not the occurrence of a Good Reason as defined in the Agreement; and


WHEREAS, Executive and Company acknowledge and agree that this reduction is not in exchange for any other payment or benefit; and


WHEREAS, the Company and Executive acknowledge and agree that the Company shall not be required to pay the amount of this 10% reduction in Base Salary to Executive at any time in the future.


NOW, THEREFORE, for the purposes of clarity, the Executive and Company hereby agree to add the following at the end of Section 4:


"During the calendar year 2009 for all purposes under this Agreement respecting benefits payable upon termination of employment, Executive's  Base Salary shall mean the amount of $630,000 as in effect on April 30, 2009 as previously approved by the Company (or if applicable any increase by the Company  above  such  amount)  and  shall  not  be  reduced  by  any  voluntary reduction in Base Salary by Executive."


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have executed this Agreement on June 2, 2009.


SEITEL, INC.
	
			
	By:
	/s/
	Marcia H. Kendrick

	Name:
	Marcia H. Kendrick

	Title:
	Senior Vice President






EXECUTIVE:
	
		
	/s/
	Robert D. Monson

	Robert D. Monson
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 395 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 395

  To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide a refundable 
        income tax credit for the recycling of hazardous wastes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 5, 1993

 Mr. Solomon introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide a refundable 
        income tax credit for the recycling of hazardous wastes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CREDIT FOR RECYCLING HAZARDOUS WASTES.

    (a) In General.--Subpart C of part IV of subchapter A of chapter 1 
of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to refundable credits) 
is amended by adding at the end thereof the following new section:

``SEC. 35. CREDIT FOR RECYCLING HAZARDOUS WASTES.

    ``(a) In General.--There shall be allowed as a credit against the 
tax imposed by this subtitle for the taxable year an amount equal to 2 
cents for each pound of qualified hazardous waste recycled by the 
taxpayer during the taxable year.
    ``(b) Qualified Hazardous Waste.--For purposes of this section, the 
term `qualified hazardous waste' means any substance--
            ``(1) which is listed by the Environmental Protection 
        Agency under section 3001 of the Solid Waste Act, or the 
        characteristics of which are identified under such section 
        3001, and
            ``(2) which is a waste product generated by the taxpayer in 
        a trade or business conducted by the taxpayer.''
    (b) Clerical Amendment.--The table of sections for such subpart C 
is amended by adding at the end thereof the following new item:

                              ``Sec. 35. Credit for recycling hazardous 
                                        wastes.''
    (c) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply to substances recycled after the date of the enactment of this 
Act in taxable years ending after such date.

                                 <all>
```
7/22/2015 Request for Information ­ FAA­2015­1172

https://email.dot.gov/owa/9­AWA­AVS­333Exemptions@faa.gov/?ae=Item&t=IPM.Note&id=RgAAAABFvqQJAFf5SI8crGhIsEIyBwD3qfMUO7BCQ74YBi9P12... 1/1

Request for Information ­ FAA­2015­1172

9­AWA­AVS­333Exemptions (FAA)

Sent:Wednesday, July 22, 2015 4:31 PM

To: info@archangeldronevideography.com

Dear Ms. Ghabriall:

This letter is to inform you that the following information is missing from your petition (Docket No. FAA­2015­1172).

This information is necessary for the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) to process your petition.

Provide a copy of the Motion Picture and Television Operations Manual (MPTOM) which is required by Order

8900.1, Volume 3, Chapter 8, Section 1. If you wish for us to proceed without this manual and remove

closed‐set filming from your proposed operation please inform of us of your intention by the requested

response date listed below.

Please submit the additional information (non‐proprietary) to your docket at www.regulations.gov and submit any

proprietary information to the FAA Headquarters or electronically via email to 333exemptions@faa.gov. If you want

us to process your request any further, we must receive the information described above by 8/5/15. If we do not

receive the information, we will close the docket without notifying you further.

If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at (202) 267­4264.

Sincerely,

Dan Ngo

FAA Office of Rulemaking
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03
- 21
- 00609
- CR

Ronald Rudolph Rodriguez , Appellant

v. The State of Texas , Appellee

FROM THE 207TH DISTRICT COURT OF COMAL COUNTY NO. CR2015
- 395 , THE HONORABLE R. BRUCE BOYER , JUDGE PRESIDING

O R D E R A N D M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

PER CURIAM

Appellant’s brief was originally due April 29, 2022. On May 9, 2022 , t his Court sent a notice to appellant informing him that his brief was overdue and that a fa ilure to file a satisfactory response by May 19, 2022 , would result in the referral of this case to the trial

court for a hearing under Rule 38.8(b) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. To date, no appellant ’ s brief h as been filed

.

The appeal i s a bated and remanded to the trial court. The trial court shall conduct a hearing to determine whether appellant desires to prosecute this appeal and, if so, whether
counsel has aband oned this appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(b)(2), (3). The court shall ma ke appropriate written findings and recommendations. See id . If necessary, the court shall appoint substitute counsel who will effectively represent appellant in this appeal. Following the hearing, which shall be transcribed, the tria l court shall order the appropriate supplemental clerk’s and2

reporter’s records

— including all findings and orders

— to be prepared and forwarded to this
Court no later than July 8 , 2022

. See id. R. 38.8(b) (3)

.

It is so ordered June 7, 2022.

Before Ju stic es Goodwin, Baker , a nd Triana
Abated and Remanded
Filed: June 7, 2022
Do Not Publish
----

----

I Informacje

Komisja

----

Wykaz organów publicznych lub podmiotów odpowiedzialnych za kontrolę, o których mowa w art. 15 rozporządzenia (EWG) nr 2092/91

(Tekst mający znaczenie dla EOG)

(2005/C 16/01)

Artykuł 9 rozporządzenia Rady (EWG) nr 2092/91 z dnia 24 czerwca 1991 r. w sprawie produkcji ekologicznej produktów rolnych oraz znakowania produktów rolnych i środków spożywczych stanowi, że Państwa Członkowskie tworzą system kontroli wykonywany przez jeden lub więcej organów i/lub zatwierdzone prywatne podmioty kontrolujące.

Zgodnie z ostatnim akapitem art. 15 tego rozporządzenia, w aktualnym zawiadomieniu wykazano - na podstawie informacji udzielonych przez Państwa Członkowskie zaktualizowanych w 2004 r. - systemy uruchomione w każdym Państwie Członkowskim oraz zatwierdzone podmioty i/lub organy kontrolujące.

Systemy uruchomione w każdym Państwie Członkowskim wskazane są w kolumnie „uwagi” w następujący sposób:

Od stycznia 1998 r. zatwierdzone podmioty kontrolujące w Unii Europejskiej muszą spełniać wymogi ustanowione w warunkach normy EN 45011. (Art. 9 ust. 10 rozporządzenia nr 2092/91).

Wykaz zawiera również podmioty i/lub organy kontrolujące zatwierdzone przez Państwa nienależące do EWG, które przystąpiły do EOG.

AUSTRIA I NIEMCY

W Austrii i Niemczech podmioty są zatwierdzane na szczeblu krajów związkowych (landów) a zakres ich działalności ograniczony jest do wybranych landów. W odniesieniu do tych państw kolumna „uwagi” wskazuje, dla każdego podmiotu, land, w którym został on zatwierdzony oraz, w stosownych przypadkach, inne landy, na terenie których podmiot ten może prowadzić działania kontrolne.

Dla poszczególnych landów użyto następujących kodów:

Austria

Niemcy

HISZPANIA

Obecnie w Hiszpanii za kontrolę odpowiedzialne są wspólnoty autonomiczne (comunidades autónomas), które wykonują ją poprzez publiczne organy kontrolujące oraz prywatne podmioty kontrolujące odpowiednio wyznaczone lub zatwierdzone przez właściwe władze. Kolumna „uwagi” wskazuje wspólnoty autonomiczne, na terenie których organ lub prywatny podmiot kontrolujący może prowadzić działania kontrolne.

Dla poszczególnych regionów użyto następujących kodów:

----
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

November 29, 2005 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver 129226 Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Justices Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 129226 COA: 260689 Wayne CC: 00-008201 ROBERT EARL WALKER, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application fo r leave to appeal th e July 26, 2005 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, a nd it is DENIED, because the defendant has failed to meet the burden of establishi ng entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D).

d1121 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

November 29, 2005

Clerk
#### Gateway State Bank, Respondent, v Vincent Intrabartolo, Appellant, et al., Defendants.

In an action to recover on a guaranty of payment, the defendant Vincent Intrabartolo appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Richmond County (Leone, J.), dated October 5, 1989, which, upon an order of the same court dated September 29, 1989, denying reargument of his motion to vacate and set aside the court’s prior order dated March 7, 1989, that had granted the plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment pursuant to CPLR 3213, is in favor of the plaintiff and against the defendants in the principal sum of $418,454.36, without prejudice to subsequent actions by the plaintiff to recover its expenses in enforcing the judgment.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

In order to establish its cause of action to recover on the guaranty of payment as a matter of law, the plaintiff was required to present proof of the existence of the guaranty in question and nonpayment according to its terms *(see, AMEV Capital Corp. v Kirk,*169 AD2d 802; *Fidelity N. Y. v Hanover Cos.,*148 AD2d 577).

The plaintiff presented undisputed evidence that the appellant had executed a guaranty of payment for a $400,000 corporate loan in favor of J.D.A.M. Realty Corp. (hereinafter JDAM). The appellant did not contest the existence of the guaranty or that he had failed to comply with the plaintiff’s demand for payment after JDAM defaulted. As the appellant did not demonstrate the existence of any triable factual issues, summary judgment was properly granted to the plaintiff *(see, AMEV Capital Corp. v Kirk, supra; Fidelity N. Y. v Hanover Cos., supra; Ihmels v Kahn,*126 AD2d 701; *Gateway State Bank v Shangri-La Private Club for Women,*113 AD2d 791, *affd*67 NY2d 627; *see also,*UCC 3-416 [1]). Thompson, J. P., Brown, Kunzeman and Balletta, JJ., concur.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Overseas Private Investment Corporation

      ( print page 44681)    

# FEDERAL REGISTER CITATION OF PREVIOUS ANNOUNCEMENT:

83 FR 40095.

# PREVIOUSLY ANNOUNCED TIME AND DATE OF THE MEETING:

1 p.m., September 5, 2018.

# CHANGES IN THE MEETING:

                        OPIC's Sunshine Act notice of its Public Hearing in Conjunction with each Board meeting was published in the                         **Federal Register**                         (Volume 83, Number 156, Pages 40095-40096) on Monday, August 13, 2018. No requests were received to provide testimony or submit written statements for the record; therefore, OPIC's public hearing scheduled for 1 p.m., September 5, 2018, in conjunction with OPIC's September 13, 2018, Board of Directors meeting has been cancelled.                    

# CONTACT PERSON FOR INFORMATION:

                        Information on the hearing cancellation may be obtained from Catherine F.I. Andrade at (202) 336-8768, or via email at                         *Catherine.Andrade@opic.gov.*

Dated: August 29, 2018.

Catherine F.I. Andrade,

OPIC Corporate Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2018-19129 Filed 8-29-18; 4:15 pm]

 BILLING CODE 3210-01-P
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

ERIC MARTIN SCHLIER,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 604 MAL 2020

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 20th day of April, 2021, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
No. 1D 16

- 5526

_____________________________ O TIS J AMES W RIGHT , Appellant,

v.

S TATE OF F LORIDA , Appellee.

_____________________________ On appeal from the Circuit Court for Gulf County

. John L. Fishel
, II, Judge

. March 22, 2018

P ER C URIAM

.
A FFIRMED

. B.L. T HOMAS , C.J. and
, J AY , and M.K. T HOMAS , JJ., concur

.

_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________ Otis James Wright, pro se
, Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Anne C. Conley, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee
, for Appellee.
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3917 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 3917

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

            October 7 (legislative day, September 12), 1994

                                Received

            October 8 (legislative day, September 12), 1994

       Read twice and referred to the Committee on Armed Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
                For the relief of Arthur A. Carron, Jr.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. WAIVER OF TIME LIMITATIONS.

    The time limitations set forth in section 3702(b) of title 31, 
United States Code, shall not apply with respect to a claim by Arthur 
A. Carron, Jr., of Bark River, Michigan, for amounts due to him by the 
Department of the Navy. The amounts due are represented by the 
following checks that were received but not negotiated by Arthur A. 
Carron, Jr.:
            (1) Treasury check number 2,831,843, dated October 18, 
        1966, in the amount of $10,850.74 for salary and expenses.
            (2) Treasury check number 10,445,856, dated January 29, 
        1971, in the amount of $1,361.00 for salary and expenses.
            (3) Treasury check number 71,681,041, dated April 1, 1971, 
        in the amount of $562.25 for retirement pay.

SEC. 2. DEADLINE.

    Section 1 shall apply only if Arthur A. Carron, Jr., or his 
authorized representative, submits a claim pursuant to such section 
before the expiration of the 3-month period beginning on the date of 
the enactment of this Act.

            Passed the House of Representatives October 7, 1994.

            Attest:

                                           DONNALD K. ANDERSON,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
#### Dennis BUCKLEY, Sr., Petitioner, v. DICKERSON, INC., a Florida corporation, Respondent.

No. 42514.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Oct. 18, 1972.

Certiorari denied. 261 So.2d 570.

ROBERTS, C. J., and ADKINS, BOYD, McCAIN and DEKLE, JJ., concur.
**EXHIBIT      24.1**

**ENERGY      FOCUS INC.**

**2007      ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K**

**Power      of Attorney**

| /s/                  John M. Davenport                   |   | /s/                  Nicholas G. Berchtold                                     |
|----------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| John                  M. Davenport                       |   | Nicholas                  G. Berchtold                                         |
| President,                  Chief Executive Officer, and |   | Vice                  President Finance and Chief                              |
| Director;                  Principal Executive Officer   |   | Financial                  Officer; Principal Financial and Accounting Officer |
|                                                     |   |                                                                           |
| /s/                  John B. Stuppin                     |   | /s/                  Ronald Casentini                                          |
| John                  B. Stuppin                         |   | Ronald                  Casentini                                              |
| Director                                                 |   | Director                                                                       |
|                                                     |   |                                                                           |
| /s/                  Michael Kasper                      |   | /s/                  Paul Von Paumgartten                                      |
| Michael                  Kasper                          |   | Paul                  Von Paumgartten                                          |
| Director                                                 |   | Director                                                                       |
|                                                     |   |                                                                           |
| /s/                  David N. Ruckert                    |   | /s/                  Philip Wolfson                                            |
| David                  N. Ruckert                        |   | Philip                  Wolfson                                                |
| Director                                                 |   | Director                                                                       |

----
#### Jose Joaquin TOSCANO, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 66-1085.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Third District.

Aug. 7, 1967.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed.
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Finance and Accounting Service Providing payment services for the U.S. Department of Defense

Search
Search

Search

              - 
              - 
              - 
              - 
              - 

-  Military Member		 
-  Retired Military & Annuitant		 
-  Civilian Employee		 
-  Contractor & Vendor		 

HomemypayinfoProtect Yourself OnlineMobile Apps

                        - 2020 IRS W4
                        - Leave and Earnings Statements
                        - Summary View Documents
                        - Opt In for Electronic Delivery
                        - Use the Right URL
                        - Two-Factor Authentication                            - Initial Set Up
                          - Add Authenticator App
                          - Some Things To Know About Online Security
                        - myPay Browser Requirements
                        - myPay Help
                        - Password Rules                            - Password Reset Questions
                          - Password FAQs
                        - myPay Tips
                        - Protect Yourself Online                            - Mobile Apps
                          More

#### **What to know about Mobile Payment Service Apps**

**myPay login credentials****What is a mobile payment services app?****Why do apps change direct deposit information?****Questions to ask yourself before using an app?**                        - Does your current bank or credit union offer the same services?
                        - What is the reputation of the app’s providers?
                        - Why is receiving pay early important to you?
                        - Did you read the app’s Terms of Service to know what the app does and how it does it?
                        - What fees or charges will you be responsible for?
                        - Is this safe?
**Check your myPay account ****The bottom line**members
**Page updated May 5, 2022**

----

### Stay Connected

Department of Defense     Department of Veterans Affairs     Military Employment Verification     Warrior Care Website     Defense Contract Mgmt Agency  DoD Forms     Department of State     Civilian Personnel Mgmt Service     DTS Travel Center     System for Award Mgmt (SAM)    Congressional/LegislationPersonnel Force Innovation     Freedom of Information Act     DFAS Hotline   Contact Us     Accessibility / Section 508    EEO / No Fear Act  

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil