alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Stephanie Maenza, Respondent, v Saenzsak Letkajornsook et al., Appellants.

In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendants appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Roncallo, J.), dated June 7, 1989, which denied their motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, the motion is granted, and the complaint is dismissed.

In this personal injury action arising out of an automobile accident, the defendants moved for summary judgment on the ground, *inter alia,*that the plaintiff did not suffer a "serious injury” as defined by Insurance Law § 5102 (d). In opposition, the plaintiff submitted a report prepared by her chiropractor that contained a general assertion that the plaintiff suffers from a "weakness of the supportive tissue structure”. Also in opposition, the plaintiff submitted a report and an affidavit by an orthopedist. In that report, the orthopedist noted that as a result of the accident the plaintiff suffered an "acute sprain of the cervical spine”. With respect to this sprain, the orthopedist stated that "it is not possible to assess the extent of any permanency”. The orthopedist also noted that, because of the accident, the plaintiff suffered a "contusion of the left knee”, whose sequelae he diagnosed as chronic.

These allegations of sprains and contusions are insufficient to establish that the plaintiff sustained a "serious injury” as defined by the statute (Insurance Law § 5102 [d]; *see, Scheer v Koubek,*70 NY2d 678; *Licari v Elliott,*57 NY2d 230). Accord*501ingly, the Supreme Court erred in denying the defendants’ motion for summary judgment *(see also, Konco v E.T.C. Leasing Corp.,*160 AD2d 680; *Christianson v Metropolitan Suburban Bus Auth.,*157 AD2d 703; *Sundack v Power Test Petro Corp.,*150 AD2d 440). Mangano, P. J., Brown, Sullivan, Harwood and Miller, JJ., concur.
## United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

July 7, 2008

ERRATA

Appeal No. 2007-1276

INTERNATIONAL TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION v. Donald C. Winter, SECRETARY OF

THE NAVY

Decided: April 18, 2008 Precedential Opinion

On Page 15, lines 17-19, delete the sentence “Two samples reported in Table A-8 of the Feasibility Study were designated as ‘CL,’ i. e., they were composed of a majority of clay.” In place of the deleted text, substitute the following:

The same was true of samples described as “CH.” See Exhibit 155, at 3. Some samples described in Tables A-3 and A-4 of the Feasibility Study were designated “CH.”
Permanent Change of Station (PCS) Travel Interruptions

Yes

No

Continue to follow DoD’s Force 

Health Protection Guidance 

Where is 

the Soldier 

located? 1

@ Old PDS

@ New PDS

Enroute to 

New PDS

Has the 

Soldier 

shipped HHG? 

Is the Soldier 

in receipt of a 

PCS order? 1

Start

Depart Soldier from PDS and attach 

back to unit for accountability. 1

Issue DD FM 1610 to Soldier

IAW JTR 051206

Has Soldier 

been directed 

to alternate 

location?

No change to 

entitlements

Has the 

Soldier 

Cleared PDS? 

Yes

No

Depart Soldier from PDS and attach back to 

unit for accountability and PDS clearing. 1

Issue DD FM 1610 to Soldier

IAW JTR 051206

Yes

Stop PCS Out-Processing and wait on a final 

No determination on the Soldier’s movement. 

@ a Point of Entry

On Leave

Has Soldier 

been directed 

to alternate 

location?

Soldier 

ordered to 

isolate/ 

quarantine? 

(I/Q)

Soldier 

ordered to 

isolate/ 

quarantine? 

(I/Q)

Continues on leave and then 

converts to TDY. 

No

Issue DD FM 1610 to Soldier

IAW JTR 051206

No

Yes

Yes

Issue DD FM 1610 and authorize 

Per Diem at new location

IAW JTR 051206. 1

Pay PCS Allowances while in I/Q and 

while “Awaiting Transportation”

No

Yes

End leave and pay PCS Allowances while in 

I/Q and while “Awaiting Transportation”

No

Yes

Yes Go to Ordered into 

ROM Flowchart

Soldier 

ordered to 

isolate/ 

quarantine? 

(I/Q)

No

Soldier 

ordered to 

isolate/ 

quarantine? 

(I/Q)

No Start appropriate TLA

or TLE as required.

Yes

Pay Isolation Allowance 

during period of I/Q .

At end of I/Q period, start 

appropriate TLA or TLE as required.

NOTES: 

1. All Soldiers and dependents affected by stop move will not proceed from their current location without an approved exception to policy.

Proponent: DAPE-PRC, Version 1, Dated: 27 March 2020
257 La. 991

#### STATE of Louisiana, Through the DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAYS v. Theodora Milliot POOLE et vir.

No. 51221.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

March 10, 1971.

In re: Theodora M. Poole and Weldon W. Poole applying for certiorari or writ of review to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, Parish of St, Tammany. 243 So.2d 539.

Application denied. The decision of the Court of Appeal is not final. The rights of all parties are fully reserved.

SUMMERS, J.,

is of the opinion the writ should be granted in this case.
II 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 517 

To promote consumer choice and wireless competition by permitting 

consumers to unlock mobile wireless devices, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 11, 2013 

Mr. LEAHY (for himself, Mr. GRASSLEY, Mr. FRANKEN, Mr. HATCH, Mr. 

LEE, and Ms. KLOBUCHAR) introduced the following bill; which was read 

twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To promote consumer choice and wireless competition by 

permitting consumers to unlock mobile wireless devices, 

and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Unlocking Consumer 

5 Choice and Wireless Competition Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. REPEAL OF EXISTING RULE AND ADDITIONAL 

7 RULEMAKING BY LIBRARIAN OF CONGRESS. 

8 (a) REPEAL AND REPLACE.—Paragraph (3) of sec9 tion 201.40(b) of title 37, Code of Federal Regulations, 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 517 IS

1 as amended and revised by the Librarian of Congress on 

2 October 28, 2012, pursuant to his authority under section 

3 1201(a) of title 17, United States Code, shall have no 

4 force and effect, and such paragraph shall read, and shall 

5 be in effect, as such paragraph was in effect on July 27, 

6 2010. 

7 (b) RULEMAKING.—Not later than 1 year after the 

8 date of enactment of this Act, the Librarian of Congress, 

9 upon the recommendation of the Register of Copyrights, 

10 who shall consult with the Assistant Secretary for Commu11 nications and Information of the Department of Com12 merce and report and comment on his or her views in mak13 ing such recommendation, shall determine, consistent with 

14 the requirements set forth under section 1201(a)(1) of 

15 title 17, United States Code, whether to extend the exemp16 tion for the class of works described in section 

17 201.40(b)(3) of title 37, Code of Federal Regulations, as 

18 amended by subsection (a), to include any other category 

19 of wireless devices in addition to wireless telephone 

20 handsets. 

21 (c) RULE OF CONSTRUCTION.—Nothing in this Act 

22 alters, or shall be construed to alter, the authority of the 

23 Librarian of Congress under section 1201(a)(1) of title 

24 17, United States Code. 

Æ 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
<page>	 	   		  EXHIBIT 32.01



CERTIFICATION OF PRESIDENT PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Annual Report of Morgan Stanley Spectrum
Global Balanced L.P. (the ?Partnership?) on Form 10-K for the
period ended December 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the ?Report?), I, Walter
Davis, President of Demeter Management Corporation, the general
partner of the Partnership, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-
Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:
(1)	The Report fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934; and
(2)	The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Partnership.





By:	  /s/	Walter Davis

Name:		Walter Davis
Title:	President

Date:		March 27, 2008












-
MPS GROUP, INC.



Exhibit 32.2

MPS GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005 of MPS Group, Inc. (the Form 10-K), I,
Robert P. Crouch, Senior Vice President, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Form 10-K fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                                           
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                           
|/S/     ROBERT P. CROUCH                                                   
|Senior Vice President, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer March 14, 2006
|
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

September 8, 2014

No. 04-14-00396-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF H.A.G., A CHILD,

From the 131st Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2012-PA-02990

Honorable Olin B. Strauss, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

Appellee's motion for extension of time to file brief is hereby GRANTED. Time is 

extended to September 12, 2014.

_________________________________

Marialyn Barnard, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 8th day of September, 2014.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 171 (Tuesday, September 4, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Page 44905]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-19110]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE


Notice of Lodging Proposed Consent Decree

    In accordance with Departmental Policy, 28 CFR 50.7, notice is 
hereby given that a proposed Consent Decree in United States v. Dion 
Cumbie, Case No. 2:18-cv-02366-DCN, was lodged with the United States 
District Court for the District of South Carolina, Charleston Division, 
on August 27, 2018.
    This proposed Consent Decree concerns a complaint filed by the 
United States against Dion Cumbie, pursuant to Sections 301(a), 309(b), 
and 309(d) of the Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C. 1311(a), 1319(b), and 
1319(d), to obtain injunctive relief from and impose civil penalties 
against the Defendant for violating the Clean Water Act by discharging 
pollutants without a permit into waters of the United States. The 
proposed Consent Decree resolves these allegations by requiring the 
Defendant to restore the impacted areas and/or perform mitigation and 
to pay a civil penalty.
    The Department of Justice will accept written comments relating to 
this proposed Consent Decree for thirty (30) days from the date of 
publication of this Notice. Please address comments to Martin 
McDermott, Senior Attorney, United States Department of Justice, 
Environment and Natural Resources Division, Post Office Box 7611, 
Washington, DC 20044-7611 and refer to United States v. Dion Cumbie, 
Case No. 2:18-cv-02366-DCN, DJ # 90-5-1-1-18616.
    The proposed Consent Decree may be examined at the Clerk's Office, 
United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, 
Charleston Division, 85 Broad Street, Charleston, SC 29401. In 
addition, the proposed Consent Decree may be examined electronically at 
http://www.justice.gov/enrd/consent-decrees.

Cherie L. Rogers,
Assistant Section Chief, Environmental Defense Section, Environment and 
Natural Resources Division.
[FR Doc. 2018-19110 Filed 8-31-18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-15-P
Exhibit 32.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO





18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350





In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of RDA Holding Co. (the “Company”) for the quarter ended June 30, 2012 (the “Report”), Paul R. Tomkins, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of his knowledge:





(1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated:August 8, 2012By:/s/ Paul R. TomkinsPaul R. TomkinsExecutive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Ex 10.13(i)1






Exhibit 10.13(i)


AMENDMENT TO THE 
CLEARWATER PAPER CORPORATION 
SALARIED SUPPLEMENTAL BENEFIT PLAN
The Clearwater Paper Corporation Salaried Supplemental Benefit Plan, as amended and restated as of January 1, 2012 (the “Plan”), is hereby further amended by revising the first paragraph of Section 5(b) of the Plan to read as follows, effective as of December 1, 2013 (the subsequent paragraphs of Section 5(b) shall remain unchanged):
“(b)  401(k) Plan Supplemental Benefit.  By the later of (i) January 31st of the calendar year immediately following the first calendar year in which the Participant first accrues a benefit under this Plan (or if earlier, thirty (30) days after first becoming eligible to participate in the Clearwater Paper Corporation Management Deferred Compensation Plan or any successor plan), or (ii) December 31, 2008, each Participant shall elect to receive distribution of the Participant’s vested 401(k) Plan Supplemental Benefit in fifteen or fewer annual installments or in a lump sum beginning in the Plan Year (but no later than March 15th of such Plan Year) following the Plan Year in which the Participant Separates from Service by filing the prescribed form with the Corporation.  A Participant shall have only one form of payment election in effect for the entire 401(k) Plan Supplemental Benefit accrued during all Plan Years beginning prior to January 1, 2014.  Prior to each Plan Year beginning on or after January 1, 2014, a Participant shall be permitted to make a separate form of payment election for the 401(k) Plan Supplemental Benefit to be accrued in such Plan Year, provided that a Participant’s form of payment election in effect for any Plan Year shall remain in effect for the 401(k) Plan Supplemental Benefit accrued in each subsequent Plan Year unless and until the Participant makes a new form of payment election in the manner prescribed by the Committee.  Each form of payment election made pursuant to this Section 5(b) shall be irrevocable.  Distribution will be made in accordance with the Participant’s election except as provided below.  The amount of any annual installment shall be determined by dividing the amount credited to the Participant’s bookkeeping account as of the last day of the Plan Year preceding the date of distribution of such installment by the total number of installments elected by the participant less the number of installments already paid.  For purposes of the Plan, installment payments shall be treated as a single distribution under section 409A of the Code.  All annual installment payments shall be payable no later than March 15th of the payment year.”
 
Date:  12/17/13                  CLEARWATER PAPER CORPORATION


By:  /s/ Jackson Lynch    
Name:  Jackson O. Lynch III 
Title:    Senior Vice President, Human Resources
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3982 Reported in House (RH)]

                                                 Union Calendar No. 291
103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 3982

                          [Report No. 103-522]

      Entitled the ``Ocean Radioactive Dumping Ban Act of 1994''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 8, 1994

 Mr. Weldon (for himself and Mr. Ortiz) introduced the following bill; 
  which was referred to the Committee on Merchant Marine and Fisheries

                              May 23, 1994

Additional sponsors: Mr. Fields of Texas, Mr. Manton, Mr. Bateman, Mr. 
              Pallone, Mr. Young of Alaska, and Mr. Studds

                              May 23, 1994

  Reported with an amendment, committed to the Committee of the Whole 
       House on the State of the Union, and ordered to be printed
                  [Insert the part printed in italic]

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
      Entitled the ``Ocean Radioactive Dumping Ban Act of 1994''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    The Act may be cited as the ``Ocean Radioactive Dumping Ban Act of 
1994''.

SEC. 2. AMENDMENTS TO THE OCEAN DUMPING ACT.

    Title I of the Marine Protection, Research, and Sanctuaries Act of 
1972 (Public Law 92-532) is amended--
            (1) in section 3, by--
                    (A) striking paragraph (j);
                    (B) redesignating the following paragraphs 
                accordingly; and
                    (C) altering any reference to those redesignated 
                paragraphs;
            (2) in section 102(a), by striking ``high-level'' before 
        ``radioactive waste''; and
            (3) in section 104, by striking subsection (i).

SEC. 3. CLARIFICATION.

    Nothing in this Act shall affect the transportation of dredged 
material for the purpose of dumping it into ocean waters under section 
103 of the Marine Protection, Research, and Sanctuaries Act of 1972.
  
  
  

                                                 Union Calendar No. 291

103d CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 3982

                          [Report No. 103-522]

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

      Entitled the ``Ocean Radioactive Dumping Ban Act of 1994''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                              May 23, 1994

  Reported with an amendment, committed to the Committee of the Whole 
       House on the State of the Union, and ordered to be printed
```
EXHIBIT 21.1



SUBSIDIARIES OF PEMSTAR INC.



|                                      |  |                         
|------------------------------------- |  | ------------------------
|Subsidiary                            |  | Country of Incorporation
|                                      | 
|Turtle Mountain Corporation           |  | United States           
|                                      | 
|Pemstar Luxembourg S.a.r.l.           |  | Luxembourg              
|                                      | 
|Pemstar Singapore Pte Ltd             |  | Singapore               
|                                      | 
|Pemstar Netherlands Holding B.V.      |  | The Netherlands         
|                                      | 
|Pemstar BV                            |  | The Netherlands         
|                                      | 
|Pemstar Romania Holding B.V.          |  | The Netherlands         
|                                      | 
|Pemstar Thailand Limited              |  | Thailand                
|                                      | 
|Pemstar (Tianjin) Enterprise Ltd.     |  | China                   
|                                      | 
|Pemstar de Mexico, S. de R.L. de C.V. |  | Mexico                  
|                                      | 
|Pemstar Ireland Ltd.                  |  | Ireland                 
|                                      | 
|Pemstar Romania Srl                   |  | Romania                 
|                                      | 
|Pemstar Brasil Ltda.                  |  | Brazil                  
|                                      | 
|Pemstar Japan KK                      |  | Japan                   
|                                      | 
|Pemstar Israel Ltd.                   |  | Israel
----

|   | (1) | Registration Statement on Form S-4 (File No. 333-34641); |
|--------|-----|----------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | Registration Statement on Form S-8 (File No. 333-82282); |
|--------|-----|----------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (3) | Registration Statement on Form S-3 (File No. 333-113782); |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (4) | Registration Statement on Form S-3 (File No. 333-116107); |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (5) | Registration Statement on Form S-8 (File No. 333-124676); and |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (6) | Registration Statement on Form S-8 (File No. 333-127481). |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------|

----
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)

In connection with this Report on Form 10-Q for the three months ended December 31, 2017, or the Report, of PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd., or the Registrant, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Arthur H. Penn, Chief Executive Officer of the Registrant, hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge, that:

 

|        |     |                                                                                                                                        |
|--------|-----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and |

 

|        |     |                                                                                                                                                         |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant. |

 

|                                                       |
|-------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                  |
| /s/ Arthur H. Penn                                    |
| Name:  Arthur H. Penn                       |
| Title:    Chief Executive Officer |
| Date:    February 8, 2018    |