T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pa ne l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l ar g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T B I AO Z HE NG , P et i t i on er , v. E R I C H . H O L D E R , J r ., A tto rn e yG e n e r a l, R e s p o n d e n t. N o. 09- 71899 A ge nc yN o. A 072- 337- 305 ME MOR AN DU M *

O n P e t i t i on f

orR e vi e w of

a n O r de rof

the B o a r do f I m m ig r a tio n A p p e a ls S ubm i tt e d M ar c h 8, 2011 ** B efo re: F A R R IS , L E A V Y , an dB Y B E E , C i rcu i tJu d g es. B i ao Z heng , a nat i ve and ci t i ze n o f C hi na, pet i t i on s f or re vi ew of the B oard of I m m i gr a t i on A ppe a l s ’ ( “ B I A ” ) or de rde ny i ng hi s m ot i on t o r e ope n. W e ha ve j ur i s di c t i on unde r8 U . S . C . § 1252. W e r e vi e w f orabus e of

di s c r e t i on the de ni a l of 

# FI LED MA R 22 2011 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS09- 71899 2 am o tio n to r e o p e n , H

e v . G on zales , 501 F . 3d 1128, 1130- 31 ( 9th C i r . 2007) , a nd w e d e n yin p a rt an dd is m is s in p art th e p e titio n f o rr e v ie w . T h e B I A d idn o t ab u s e its d is c r e tio n in d e n y in g Z h e n g ’s m o tio n to r e o p e n to r e s c in dh is d e p o rta tio n o r d e rb e c au s e th e h e ar in g n o tic e w a s s e n t b yc e rtif ie dm a il t o the a ddr e s s l a s tpr ovi de d byZ he ng and he f a i l e d t o t i m e l yi nf

orm the im m ig r a tio n c o u rt o f

h is a d d r e s s c h an g e , s e e Arr i e ta v . I NS , 1 1 7 F .3 d4 2 9 , 4 3 1 ( 9 th C i r . 1 9 9 7 ) ( p e rc u r i a m ) ( h e a r i n g n o t i c e s e n tb yc e rt i f i e dm a i l t o a l i e n ’ s l a s tk n o wn addres s i s s uffi ci entno t i ce ). T he B IA di d n otabuse i t s di sc re t i on i n d enyi ng Z heng ’ s m ot i on t o reopen as un t i m el y bec ause he fi l ed i tm ore than 1 0 years af t erthe fi nal depo rt at i on order, se e 8 C . F . R . § 1 00 3. 23 (b)( 1), and h e f ai l ed t o d em on strat e c hang ed coun try c ondi t i ons t o qua l i f

yf orthe r e gul a t orye xc e pt i on t o the t i m e l i m i tf orf i l i ng m ot i on s t o reopen, or thathe w arrant ed equi t abl e t ol l i ng of the fi l i ng deadl i ne, se e 8 C . F . R . § 1 00 3. 22 (b)( 4)(i ); He , 50 1 F . 3d at11 32 (c hang ed pers on alci rc um st ance s i ns uf f i c i e ntt o s upporta n unt i m e l ym ot i on t o r e ope n) ; I tu rr i b a rr i a v . I

NS , 321 F . 3d 8 8 9 , 8 9 7 ( 9 th C ir . 2 0 0 3 ) ( e q u itab le to llin g a v a ilab le “w h e n ap e titio n e ris prevent ed fr om fi l i ng because of dec ept i on , fr aud, or error, as l on g as the pet i t i on er ac t s w i th d ue di l i gence”) .09- 71899 3 W e l ac k j uri sdi ct i on t o revi ew Z heng ’ s i neff ec t i ve as si st ance of coun se l c la im b e c au s e h e f

a ile dto e x h au s t it. Se e B a rr o n v . A s h c r o ft , 358 F . 3d 674, 678 (9th C i r. 20 04 ). P E T IT IO N F O R R E V IE W D E N IE D i n p art; D IS M IS S E D i n p art.