P u rsuan t t o 5 T H C IR . R. 47. 5, t h e courtha s det erm i n ed that th i s opi n i on * shou l d n otbe pu bl i shedan d i s not preceden texcept u n der t h e li m i t ed c i r c um s t anc e s s e tf

o r t h i n 5 T H C IR . R. 47. 5. 4. 

### INTHE UNITED S TATESCOU RT OFAPPEALS

FORTHEFIFTH CIRCUIT

N o. 08- 50314 C onfer enc e C al endar UN I TE D S TA TE S OF AM ERI CA, P l ai n t if f

- A pp el l ee v. D AV ID P E N A -H E R N A N D E Z , D e fe nda nt - Appe l l ant

A pp ealf

rom t h e U n i t ed S t ates D i st ri ctC ou rt f or th e W est ernD i st ri ctof T exas U SDC N o . 3 : 0 7 - CR- 2 8 3 5 - ALL B ef oreH IG G IN B O T H AM , D AV IS, an d C L E M E N T , C i rcui tJu dg es. P E R C U R IAM: * D a vidP en a -H ern a n d ez ap p ea l s th e se n ten ce im p ose df oll ow i n g h i s gu i l ty pl ea conv i ct i onof

att em pted il l egal reentry af t er deportat i on . H e w as sentenced t o 36 m ont hs of i m pri so nm ent and t hre e year s of supervi se d r el eas e. P en aH erna n dez f

i rstargu es th at hi s s en t en ce m u stbe vac ated becau se th e di st ri ct court com m i t t ed a si gn if i can tprocedu ralerr or by fai l i n g t o exp l ai n t h e bases f or t h e i m posedsentence. Plai nerr or r evi ew i s app l i cable to this i ssue becau se United States Court of App eals

Fifth Circuit 

### F I LE D Aug ust18, 2009 Cha rl es R. F ulb ru g e II I ClerkN o. 08- 50314

2 P e n a -H e r n a n d e z fa ile dt o o bje c t o n th is b a s is ind is tr ic t c o u r t. S ee Un i t ed S t ate s v. Mondrago n- S a n ti ago , 564 F. 3d 357, 363- 64 ( 5t h C ir . 2009) , p etition force rt. f i led(Ju n e 2 4 , 2 0 0 9 ) (N o . 0 8 -1 1 0 9 9 ). A tsentenci n g, P en a- H e rn a n dez requ est ed the “l east possibl e sentence” ba s e d up o n v ar i o us fac t o r s , i nc l udi ng hi s ag e , w o r k hi s t o r y, fam ily l o c at i o n, a nd m edi calreasons. A l t h ou gh i ti m poseda w i t h i n - gu i del i n es s en t en ce, t h e di st ri ct c our tpr ovi ded no spe c if i cex pl a n a ti on f

orit s i m pl i c i tr ej ec t i on o fPenaHe r n a n d e z ’ s r e q u e s tf o ral e s s e rs e n t e n c e a n dm a d e nom e n t i o n o f t h e 1 8 U. S . C. § 3 5 5 3 (a) factors. T h u s, “th e d i stri ct cou rt fa il edto ad eq u a te ly e xp l a i n its rea son s f

or th e se n ten ce i m p ose d a s req u i red b y § 3 5 5 3 (c) , w h i ch i s erro r. ” I d. a t 36 4 . T h i s erro r “i s also p l a i n , or ob viou s, ” as “the l a w re q u iri n g co u rts to ex p l a i nsen ten ces is cl ea r. ” I d. N on eth eless, P en a -H ern a n d ez i s n ot en titl edto r e lie f o nth i s is s u e , a s h e h a s fa ile dto s h o w th a t t h e e r r o ra ffe c te dh is s u b s ta n tia lr i g h ts . Se ei d. a t 3 6 5 . P e n a -H e r n a n d e z h a s n o t s h o w n th a t h is s e n te n c e is p r o c e d u r a llyu n r e a s o n a b le . Se ei d. ; seealso G allv. Un i t ed S t ate s , 1 2 8 S . C t. 5 8 6 , 5 9 7 (20 0 7 ). P e n a -H e r n a n d e z co n te n d s th a t t h e im p o s e ds e n te n c e w a s s u b s ta n tiv e ly u n reasona bl e becau se i tw as g reat er than necessary t o accom pl i sh the goals set f orth i n § 355 3( a) an d because h i s pri or convic t i on f or obstr u ct i on w as d ou bl ecoun t ed. H e al so asser t s th at th e presum pti onof reasonab l en ess that thi s c ou rt n orm al ly ap pl i es t o w i t h i n - gu i del i n es s en t en ces i s i n ap pl i cabl e t o hi s s en t en ce becau se U . S . S . G . § 2L 1. 2, the G u i del i n e u sed t o calc u l ate h i s advis ory guidel i n es r ang e , i s no te m pir i c ally s upp o r t e d. P e n a -H e r n a n d e z ’ s ch a lle n g e to th e p r e s u m p tio n o f r e a s o n a b le n e s s is f o r e c l o s e d b y t hi s c o ur t ’ s ho l di ng i n Mondrago n- Sa nt i ago , 564 F. 3d at366- 67, w h ic h w a s is s u e da fte rh e file dh is a p p e lla te b r ie f. A c c o r d in g ly , h is s e n te n c e is a ffo r d e dap r e s u m p tio no f r e a s o n a b le n e s s . Se ei d. A dd i t i on al ly, t h e sentence w a s co r r e c tlyca lc u la te d , a n dth e r e w a s n o im p e r m is s ib le d o u b le co u n tin g . S ee U. S . S . G. § 2 L1 . 2 (b ) ( 1 ) & a p p l i c a t i o n n o t e6 . P e n a - He r n a n d e z h a s n o ts h o wnN o. 08- 50314

3 suff i ci en treason f

or th i s c ou rtt o di st u rb t h e sentence i m posedby the di st ri ct cou rt. T h e d i s t r i c tc o u r t ’ s j u d g me n ti s A F F I RMED.