alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Notice: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the Atlantic and Maryland Reporters. Users are requested to notify the Clerk of the Court of any formal errors so that corrections may be made before the bound volumes go to press. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS
No. 2 2

- BG

- 398
I N RE A ZUBUIKE A KUBUEZE O SEMENE , R ESPONDENT

. A Member of the Bar of the District of Columbia Court of Appeals (Bar Registration No. 496245 ) On Report and Recommendation of the Board on Professional Responsibility ( DDN 101

- 17; B DN 18

- 105 ) (Decided July 14 , 20 2 2 )
Before M C L EESE and D EAHL , Associate Judges , and W ASHINGTON , Senior Judge

. P ER C URIAM : The Ad Hoc Hearing Committee concluded that respondent
Azubuike Akubueze Osemene violated District of Columbia Rules of Professional Conduct 1.5(b) and 1.6(a) and engaged in dishonesty during disciplinary proceedings . Specifically, t he Committee found by clear and convincing evidence that respondent failed to provide his client with a written agreement detailing his fee or the scope of representation , despite his client’s request for s uch a written statement. It also found that respondent improperly disclosed confidential client
information in his motion to withdraw. The Committee recommended that2
respondent be publicly censured. T he Board on Professional Responsibility accepted the Committee’s findings and recommendation. Neither r espondent n or Disciplinary Counsel filed an exception to the Board’s Report and Recommendation.

Under D.C. Bar R. XI, § 9(h)(2), “if no exceptions are filed to the Board’s report, the [c] o urt will enter an order imposing the discipline recommended by the Board upon the expiration of the time permit ted for filing exceptions.” See In re Viehe , 762 A. 2d 5 42, 543 (D.C. 2000) (per curiam) (“When

. . . there are no exceptions to the Board’s repo rt and recommendation, our deferential standard of review becomes even more deferential.”). We see no reason to disregard the Board’s
conclusions and recommended sanction. See In re Ponds , 876 A.2d 636, 63 6

- 3 7 (D.C. 2005) (imposing public censure for “i m properly disclosing confidential
information in a motion to withdraw as defense counsel for a client ”) ; see also In re Szymkowicz , 124 A.3d 1078, 1088 (D.C. 2015) (“[W]e accept the Board's recommendation that the Rule 1.5(b) violation by itself would warrant an informal
admonition

. ” (emphasis added)).

Accordingly, it is3

ORDERED that respondent Azubuike Akubueze Osemene is hereby publicly
censured

.
# C_2018101EN.01017601.xml

| 16.3.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 101/176 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.3.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 101/176

---

P8_TA(2016)0295

EU-Peru Agreement on the short-stay visa waiver ***

European Parliament legislative resolution of 5 July 2016 on the draft Council decision on the conclusion, on behalf of the European Union, of the Agreement between the European Union and the Republic of Peru on the short-stay visa waiver (12099/2015 — C8-0143/2016 — 2015/0199(NLE))

(Consent)

(2018/C 101/16)

The European Parliament,

The European Parliament

| — | having regard to the draft Council decision (12099/2015), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the draft Council decision (12099/2015),

| — | having regard to the draft Agreement between the European Union and the Republic of Peru on the short-stay visa waiver (12097/2015), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the draft Agreement between the European Union and the Republic of Peru on the short-stay visa waiver (12097/2015),

| — | having regard to the request for consent submitted by the Council in accordance with Article 77(2)(a) and Article 218(6), second subparagraph, point (a)(v), of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (C8-0143/2016), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the request for consent submitted by the Council in accordance with Article 77(2)(a) and Article 218(6), second subparagraph, point (a)(v), of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (C8-0143/2016),

| — | having regard to Rule 99(1), first and third subparagraphs, Rule 99(2) and Rule 108(7) of its Rules of Procedure, |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to Rule 99(1), first and third subparagraphs, Rule 99(2) and Rule 108(7) of its Rules of Procedure,

| — | having regard to the recommendation of the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs (A8-0197/2016), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the recommendation of the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs (A8-0197/2016),

| 1. | Gives its consent to conclusion of the agreement; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Gives its consent to conclusion of the agreement;

| 2. | Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council, the Commission and the governments and parliaments of the Member States and of the Republic of Peru. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council, the Commission and the governments and parliaments of the Member States and of the Republic of Peru.

---
SERVE D JUN E7 , 201 1 U.S . DEPARTMEN T O FTRANSPORTATIO N

OFFIC EO FHEARING S WASHINGTON , D C IN TH EMATTE RO F EMPIR EFLIGH T ACADEM Y FA A DOCKE T NO . [T O B E ASSIGNED ]

(Civi l Penalty Action ) FDM S NO . FAA-2011-029 0 

### .-^-ARTMEN TO F ^^iS!^ORTATiO N " > TOPERATION S .!C> l - 8 P 2 : 1 3

ORDE RO FCHIE FADMINISTRATIV E LA WJUDG E GRANTIN GMOTIO N FO REXTENSIO N O FTIM E B y motio n date dJun e 6 , 2011 , Complainan t move dfor

an extensio n o f

tim e t o answe r Respondent' s Motion for Partia l Summary Judgment . Complainan t state s tha t

Responden t

had indicate di t

ha dn o objectio n t o th e extension . Fo r goo dcaus e shown , Complainant' s motio n i s granted . Complainant' s answe r t o Respondent' s motio n may b e filedo n o r befor e Jun e 24 , 2011 , S O ORDERED . [bnni e A . Yod e Chie f Administrativ e I^wMig e

# M . J?|:»vp]^o . FAA*2f>31-029 0 (Civi l Penalty A)ijti«m

) ORIG i Federa l Aviatio n Administratio n 80 0 Independenc e Avenue , S.W . Washington , D C 2059 1 Attention : Hearin g Docke t Clerk , A C Wilbu r Wrigh t Building ON ECOP Y (VI A FIRST-CLAr * Gregory S . Winton , Respondent' s Cotoite i Th e Aviatio n La w Fir mif ^ On e Researc hCourt, Suit e 450 1 '.''^'^ Rockville , M D 2085 0 TEL : 301-294-855 0 FAX : 301-294-2525 Ziachar y M . Herman , Complainant' s Coutf$ i Offi( » o f th e JR^ona l Coun^l , AEA- 7 '^, Eastern Regio n Federa l Aviatio n Administratio n 1 Aviatio n Plaza , Roo m56 1 Jamaica , N Y 1143 4 TEL : 718-553-325 8 FAX : 718-533-569 9 l: i

' -t i



### ^ 7 ';,': : :;%i . Th e Honorabl e Ronni e A . Yoder , Chie f Administrativ e Law Judg e U.S . Departmen t

o f Transportatio n Offic e o f Hearings , M-20 , Roo mE12-32 « i^OONe w Jwse y Avenue , S.E . Washington , D C 2059 0 TEL : 202-366-214 2 FAX : 202-366-753 6 '•f- t SxP . i ^ i 'ih< ' •



### m N ;

i W 5YCCHPVBVFAX )

• ^ t :yl>i : ;i:;f S .ci>fi .

' Servic e W9 S b y U.S . Mail . Fo

r service iQ ^ Aviatio n Administration, 60

0 Independenc

e A v E) C 20591 ; Attaition : Hearin

g Docke t Cleric, A C

T l • ^us e A e fbtlowpga4iNss : Federa

l ling-^^ui^aWtd ^ WJ^tngton ,
U.S. flag
              An official website of the United States government





---

close


back button
 Iran source
 Print Share
 Basic Facts Population
 People per sq. km
 Males per 100 females
 Children per woman
 Goods exported from U.S.
 Goods imported to U.S.
 Change in exports from U.S. for 2014 to 2023
 A Closer Look Source
 Comparisons
 Compared to the U.S.
 Compared to the World
 K = Thousands
                M = Millions
                B = Billions
  Merchandise Trade U.S. Trade in Manufactured Goods
 Top Exported Goods by U.S. State or Territory
 Population Current and Projected Population
 Population by Age and Sex
 Source and Notes Source: U.S. Census Bureau, International Database (demographic data) and USA Trade Online (trade data); Central Intelligence Agency, The World Fact Book (country reference maps). This application presents data for 228 countries and areas of the world with a 2024 population of 5,000 or more. For eleven of those countries and areas, only demographic data are presented. "Data not available" indicates that data are not available from this application.  In such instances, data may be available elsewhere at the census.gov website. Trade figures presented for France do not include data for overseas departments French Guiana, Guadeloupe, Martinique, Mayotte, and Reunion but do include data for dependencies Saint Barthelemy and Saint Martin.  Trade figures for the United Kingdom include data for crown dependencies Guernsey, Isle of Man, and Jersey. To learn more about world population projections, go to Notes on the World Population Clock. To learn more about international trade data, go to Guide to Foreign Trade Statistics. All trade figures are in U.S. dollars on a nominal basis.


CONNECT WITH US
 Information Quality
                    Data Linkage Infrastructure
                    Data Protection and Privacy Policy
                    Accessibility      
                    FOIA
                    Inspector General
                    No FEAR Act
                    U.S. Department of Commerce
                    USA.gov
  Measuring America's People, Places, and Economy
<PAGE>
                                  EXHIBIT 23.1

                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

    We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in this Registration
Statement on Form S-3 of our report dated May 24, 2000 relating to the financial
statements of Ditech Communications Corporation, which appears in Ditech's
Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the year ended April 30, 2000. We also consent
to the reference to us under the heading "Experts" in such Registration
Statement.

/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
San Jose, California
September 11, 2000
##### 



Exhibit
10.141
 AMENDMENT TO REPLACEMENT
COMMON STOCK PURCHASE WARRANT
 Amendment Company Holder Warrant
 PREAMBLE
 Digital Angel Original Warrant
 Merger Agreement
 Merger Consideration




---



##### 



NOW, THEREFORE
     THIS AMENDMENT SHALL BE CONSTRUED
AND ENFORCED IN ACCORDANCE WITH AND GOVERNED BY THE LAW OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK.
   2




---



##### 



IN WITNESS WHEREOF
 COMPANY:
    
    HOLDER:APPLIED DIGITAL SOLUTIONS, INC.
    
    KALLINA CORPORATIONBy:
    
    /s/ Lorraine M. Breece
    
    By:
    
    /s/ Scott BluesteinName:
    
    Lorraine M. Breece
    
    Name:
    
    Scott BluesteinTitle:
    
    Senior VP and Acting CFO
    
    Title:
    
    Authorized Signatory
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3724 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 3724

   To designate the United States courthouse located in Bridgeport, 
        Connecticut, as the ``Brien McMahon Federal Building''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 25, 1994

Mrs. Kennelly introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
              Committee on Public Works and Transportation

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To designate the United States courthouse located in Bridgeport, 
        Connecticut, as the ``Brien McMahon Federal Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The United States courthouse located at 915 Lafayette Boulevard in 
Bridgeport, Connecticut, shall be known and designated as the ``Brien 
McMahon Federal Building''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the courthouse referred to in section 1 
shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Brien McMahon Federal 
Building''.

                                 <all>
```
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report of ABC Acquisition Corp 1505 (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),I, Nitin Amersey, herebycertify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

 

|   | (1) | The Report fully complies  with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange  Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

|   | (2) | The information contained  in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition  and results of operations of the Company as of the date and for the periods  expressed in the Report. |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

| /s/ Nitin Amersey       |
|-------------------------|
| Nitin Amersey           |
| Chief Executive Officer |
|                    |
| November 15, 2010       |

 

 

 

The foregoing certification is being furnished solelypursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and is not being filed as part of the Reportor as a separate disclosure document.

 

 

----
#### Guss ROSS, Jr., Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1658.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Fourth District.

Nov. 17, 1967.

Appeal from Court of Record, Broward County; Raymond J. Hare, Judge.

Appeal quashed.
Materials Not Included in

Airworthiness Directive (AD) Docket

Docket Number: FAA- 2011-0471

Directorate Identifier: 2010NM219AD

84-27-50, RC --- 7/26/10

84-27-50, RB --- 5/19/10

84-27-50, RA --- 4/28/10

84-27-50 --- 3/3/10

Name/Description of Item(s) Not Included in FDMS Docket and Maintained in the 

Supplemental AD Docket

MAY BE VIEWED AT: Federal Aviation Administration

Transport Airplane Directorate

Rules Docket

1601 Lind Ave. SW.,

Renton, WA 98057

425.227.1221

DURING THE HOURS OF: 9 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday through Friday,

except Federal holidays.

Form Date: 03/05/2008
##### 



Exhibit 99.1

National Rural Utilities Cooperative Finance Corporation
Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
(18 U.S.C. Section 1350)

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Sections 1350(a) and (b)), the undersigned hereby
certifies as follows:



|1. |  | I am the Chief Executive Officer of National Rural Utilities Cooperative Finance Corporation (CFC).
|-- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|  
|2. |  | To the best of my knowledge:                                                                         



| | (A) |  | The Rural Electric Cooperative
Grantor Trust (Soyland) 1993-B1s March 31, 2003 Form 10-K
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report) fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the
Exchange Act); and
| | --- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
| | (B) |  | The information in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Rural Electric Cooperative Grantor Trust
(Soyland) 1993-B1.                                                                                             

Dated:  March 27, 2003

|    |  |                                                                                   
|--- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|By: |  | /s/  SHELDON C. PETERSEN

Sheldon C. Petersen
Chief Executive Officer

17
<PAGE>   1
                                                                   EXHIBIT 11.01

                             MEDIA ARTS GROUP, INC.

                       COMPUTATION OF NET INCOME PER SHARE
                   (IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE AMOUNTS)(1)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                         Year Ended March 31,
                                                 ---------------------------------------
                                                    1997          1996          1995
                                                 -----------   -----------   -----------
<S>                                              <C>           <C>           <C>        
Income (loss) from continuing operations ...     $     2,644   $     2,455   $     4,014
Discontinued operations ....................         (13,630)       (3,128)          (53)
Extraordinary loss .........................              --            --          (172)
                                                 -----------   -----------   -----------

Net income .................................     $   (10,986)  $      (673)  $     3,789
                                                 ===========   ===========   ===========

Weighted average common shares outstanding .           9,991         9,756         9,133
Common shares issuable on exercise of
 options and warrants (2) ..................              85           119           302
Common shares required to be issued to pay
  stockholder distributions (3) ............              --            --            46
                                                 -----------   -----------   -----------
Weighted average common and common
  equivalent shares outstanding ............          10,076         9,875         9,481
                                                 ===========   ===========   ===========

Income from continuing operations
  before extraordinary loss per common share     $      0.26   $      0.25   $      0.42
Discontinued operations ....................           (1.35)        (0.32)           --
Extraordinary loss .........................              --            --         (0.02)
                                                 -----------   -----------   -----------

Net income (loss) per share ................     $     (1.09)  $     (0.07)  $      0.40
                                                 ===========   ===========   ===========
</TABLE>

(1)     This Exhibit should be read with Note 1 of Notes to Consolidated
        Financial Statements.

(2)     The computation of common and dilutive common equivalent shares utilizes
        the treasury stock method. The initial public offering price of $7.25
        per share was used prior to August 10, 1994, the effective date of the
        initial public offering.

(3)     Represents number of shares required to be issued to pay the stockholder
        distributions of $1,000,000 using the proceeds of the Company's initial
        public offering price of $7.25 per share as if those shares were
        outstanding from January 1, 1993 through August 31, 1994.
. 

. 

. 

AUSTIN 

. . 

'?qz?E 

. rionorableI.?rede&i : 

cwl?eston, Texas . 

D&Z.-SirI 

.18 

'*nS I a?i'unnblle io rind any.lew.autborblz~ the pu&xm~ bf.~the.aut~bilen-roquosted In the rsoolutlon quoted abovs, X kindly ask 

that ,oou +-aahr ai0 lni9n 83 tapw$&ei-.'5 am, 

authorized to advert 3 30 ,fm:eettd.,o~@ .&I@, fsQn '. 

a wMl?dlt fbyc the. pisa'ent cd 33m.. " 

.., 

. 
- 

. . . 

.- ... 

.- 

’ 4: 

. I I ‘. 

: . 

. 

. . 

. . 

T&letter &~Z~11'1,.194~, .mopt&nting the 

-abbve raentioneU,~letter r43do lo. pLpt: 

Tn 8iy lotter addresad: tri$mo&!~ester2laJi 

for. aa~opiniou with reXorcnua to tba pubhase or 

mtonobLts8 as 84t aat in the Sesolutlti.af ~!YJ. 

'~dlohers~ Court aud. quotml by *e f bvs~rlooked to advbe. ';hathe two atttnaobhes are' in-- 

tentlet! awl nill be ased by ths County t2oz&aaloaQr(l'or Preolnwt ??oooi 1and-a%?oliiot1Fo; 4 ln-tu8 

ooonty* 

reforrr. to 

T&4 Court Order, a8 pou.wlll OSsarve, 

the C&I of the aUtofi?obiles tar. road 

mpervlalon but does not atate that.tha County 

~seioner irlll‘bo QI ~o~fsesd6a of 8aseey 

. &any oountiea opemte unaey%yaolui &?&a lam &oh 

. ..prohdo .~ert$.ly.~orora nore effloient x~nd system in suoh 

comtls3, and osgiia~y.proy~de~ror ‘the paymat bi ‘cioootit~ 

. . 

that &~5untp.ia not authofized to e&end Ate &&s for 

‘QL~ ~puriSi~a tit autoEoblle@ to.. E8 umd b7’tho’ oC&nSs8~~ers 

In mumotion with thehcir duties Zn &.n~ $9’ aud ,rrca th6lr 

renerrpeotlv+3 193t;riots ixi couu%y buslnosti or La ~oyvmtt‘ or repatr ana r+tcrat;o.‘bllls on mob auto;robiIes; 4%~ enql~se .a 

oopy o$. this .opinioa f?r your. oqw~hi~~oo.~ 

. 

Wh also alreotl your attgntlon to .our ojAal&-%s; 

O-752 an6 O-996 regardtug al&la2 qumMon8.~ ..a eaaloee 

o?ples of -them. .opiniom he&with.. 

fn ii& 0f the r&&w igiakia aid iie’ author- 

: ities cited tbereln, M rc~~ectmX1~ sncnar-‘*%m ebwe stated 

qmstlon .df-t+e. no~atlvo. .’ 

. 

. . 

. :~ 

. . .‘. . . . . . 

. \ I 8. 
_’ i 

-. 

, * - 

. . . . . 

. . . . 

:. 

. 

. 

. 

- . mwialQ‘T. ifr&scni,.k4~ b. . 

: 

. 

IQ 00LmeotfQll al* the sor4golus n4All your. 

atten& to opinloaa Koi.O-SllD ’ afid 04569 af this pl . p @ SOllt, COpi Of Whibb’lUSXlOlO306. ’5 

. . : 

. 

__ -. .Elmwmxs 

.-, . -. . . 

. 

: 

. .: .; .:.. ..a:“? _ ., 

.- : : ‘.- 

.;.i’ 

- # - 

. 

,. : 

. 

., _ . .. ~ :. .. 

.,:; * . 

.* :’ .-. ‘: _..’ . 

:: ..: .;. :. . . . 

1 .,
<PAGE>

                                                                  EXHIBIT 5.1

                                                           September 27, 2000

Arden Group, Inc.
2020 South Central Avenue
Compton, California 90220

Gentlemen:

         This firm has acted as counsel for Arden Group, Inc., a
Delaware corporation (the "Company"), in connection with the
registration on Form S-8 under the Securities Act of 1933, as
amended, of an additional 35,000 shares of the Class A Common
Stock, $.25 par value per share, of the Company (the "Class A
Common Stock") to be issued to certain persons upon the exercise
of stock options granted pursuant to the Non-Officer and Non-
Director Stock Option Plan of the Company (the "Plan").

         We have examined the proceedings heretofore taken by the
Company with respect to the adoption of the Plan and the
amendment to the Plan to increase the number of shares of Common
Stock covered thereby.  It is our opinion that the additional
35,000 shares of Class A Common Stock to be issued upon the
exercise of stock options granted pursuant to the Plan will, when
issued in accordance with the terms thereof, be legally issued,
fully paid and non-assessable.

         We hereby consent to the filing of this opinion as an
exhibit to the Company's Registration Statement on Form S-8.

                               Respectfully submitted,

                               CROSBY, HEAFEY, ROACH & MAY,
                               PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION



                               By: /s/ DEBORAH L. GUNNY
                                  -------------------------------
                                       Deborah L. Gunny
254 La. 789

#### Edna Stewart KINCHEN v. Leonard KINCHEN, individually, Coy Kinchen, Inc., and Jackson W. Ratcliff.

No. 50037.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Oct. 14, 1969.

In re: Edna Stewart Kinchen applying for certiorari or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, Parish of Livingston. 211 So.2d 91.

It is ordered that the writ of review issue; that the Court of Appeal send up the record in duplicate of the case; and that counsel for plaintiff and defendant be notified.