alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONDENSED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS, CONDENSED BALANCE SHEETS AND CONDENSED
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS INCLUDED IN AES IRONWOOD, L.L.C.'S FORM 10-Q FOR THE
FISCAL QUARTER ENDING JUNE 30, 2000, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                             223
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      399
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                39,886
<PP&E>                                         276,398
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 321,095
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           15,846
<BONDS>                                        308,500
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   321,095
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,320
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (610)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
# C_2018224EN.01020601.xml

| 27.6.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 224/206 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.6.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 224/206

---

P8_TA(2016)0465

US-EU Agreement on the protection of personal information relating to criminal offenses ***

European Parliament legislative resolution of 1 December 2016 on the draft Council decision on the conclusion, on behalf of the European Union, of the Agreement between the United States of America and the European Union on the protection of personal information relating to the prevention, investigation, detection, and prosecution of criminal offenses (08523/2016 — C8-0329/2016 — 2016/0126(NLE))

(Consent)

(2018/C 224/44)

The European Parliament,

The European Parliament

| — | having regard to the draft Council decision (08523/2016), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the draft Council decision (08523/2016),

| — | having regard to the draft agreement between the United States of America and the European Union on the protection of personal information relating to the prevention, investigation, detection, and prosecution of criminal offenses (08557/2016), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the draft agreement between the United States of America and the European Union on the protection of personal information relating to the prevention, investigation, detection, and prosecution of criminal offenses (08557/2016),

| — | having regard to the request for consent submitted by the Council in accordance with Article 16 and Article 218(6), second subparagraph, point (a), of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (C8-0329/2016), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the request for consent submitted by the Council in accordance with Article 16 and Article 218(6), second subparagraph, point (a), of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (C8-0329/2016),

| — | having regard to the letter from the Committee on Foreign Affairs, |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the letter from the Committee on Foreign Affairs,

| — | having regard to Rule 99(1), first and third subparagraphs, Rule 99(2), and Rule 108(7) of its Rules of Procedure, |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to Rule 99(1), first and third subparagraphs, Rule 99(2), and Rule 108(7) of its Rules of Procedure,

| — | having regard to the recommendation of the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs and the opinion of the Committee on Legal Affairs (A8-0354/2016), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the recommendation of the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs and the opinion of the Committee on Legal Affairs (A8-0354/2016),

| 1. | Gives its consent to conclusion of the agreement; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Gives its consent to conclusion of the agreement;

| 2. | Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council, the Commission and the governments and parliaments of the Member States and of the United States of America. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council, the Commission and the governments and parliaments of the Member States and of the United States of America.

---
Exhibit 23.1

Consent of Independent Auditors

The
Board of Directors
MedicaLogic/Medscape, Inc.:

We
consent to incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements (Nos. 333-94751, 333-94761 and 333-37294) on Form S-8 of
MedicaLogic/Medscape, Inc. of our report dated April 5, 2002, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of MedicaLogic/Medscape, Inc. and subsidiaries as of
December 31, 2001 and 2000, and the related consolidated statements of operations, shareholders' equity (deficit) and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended
December 31, 2001.

Our
report dated April 5, 2002 contains an explanatory paragraph that states that the Company has filed Chapter 11 Bankruptcy and completed the sale of substantially all of its
remaining net operating assets on March 25, 2002, which raise substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern. The consolidated financial statements do not include any
adjustments that might result from the outcome of that uncertainty.

/s/
KPMG LLP
Portland, Oregon
April 16, 2002

---

QuickLinks
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

## FILED August 20, 2003 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-40253 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus SERGIO PADRON-RIVERA, also known as Antonio Martinez, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. M-02-CR-679-1

-------------------- Before JONES, WIENER, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Sergio Padron-Rivera appeals the sentence imposed following his guilty plea conviction of being found in the United States after deportation/removal in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Padron-Rivera complains that his sentence was improperly enhanced pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) based on a prior conviction. He argues that the sentencing provision is unconstitutional. Padron-Rivera thus contends that his sentence should not exceedNo. 03-40253 -2- the maximum terms of imprisonment and supervised release prescribed in 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a).
In Almendarez-Torres v. United States , 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998), the Supreme Court held that the enhanced penalties in 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) are sentencing provisions, not elements of separate offenses. The Court further held that the sentencing provisions do not violate the Due Process Clause. Id. at 239-47. Padron-Rivera acknowledges that his argument is foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres , but asserts that the decision has been cast into doubt by Apprendi v. New Jersey , 530 U.S. 466, 490 (2000). He seeks to preserve his argument for further review. Apprendi did not overrule Almendarez-Torres
. See Apprendi , 530 U.S. at 489-90; United States v. Dabeit , 231 F.3d 979, 984 (5th Cir. 2000). This court must follow Almendarez-Torres “unless and until the Supreme Court itself determines to overrule it.” Dabeit , 231 F.3d at 984 (internal quotation marks and citation omitted). The judgment of the district court is
AFFIRMED. The Government has moved for a summary affirmance in lieu of filing an appellee’s brief. In its motion, the Government asks that an appellee’s brief not be required. The motion is GRANTED.
AFFIRMED; MOTION GRANTED.
EXHIBIT
32.1

CERTIFICATION
OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL

OFFICER
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the Report of Melanthios Acquisition Corp. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended
March 31, 2013 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, William
Tay, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:



|(1) | The Report
    fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information
    contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
    Company.
|--- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



By:
/s/ William Tay

William
Tay, President, Secretary and

Principal
Financial Officer

Dated:
April 22, 2013
# C_2015066EN.01000601.xml

| 24.2.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 66/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.2.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 66/6

---

Notice of the Ministry of Environment of the Slovak Republic concerning Directive 94/22/EC of the European Parliament and Council on the conditions for granting and using authorizations for the prospection, exploration and production of hydrocarbons

(2015/C 66/07)

The Ministry of Environment of the Slovak Republic hereby gives notice that on 22 December 2014 it received an application for the designation of an exploration area for the geological prospection and confirmation of deposits of flammable natural gas (hydrocarbons) in the ‘Klenová’ area; the period requested is four years.

The proposed exploration area cowers 41,82 km2 in the district of Snina and is delimited by lines connecting vertices (forming a closed geometrical shape with straight sides).

2

Number and coordinates of the vertices of the exploration area:

| Points | Y | X |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 1. | 187 697,00 | 1 213 888,00 |
| 2. | 184 424,00 | 1 212 229,00 |
| 3. | 178 076,00 | 1 218 876,00 |
| 4. | 180 953,00 | 1 222 722,00 |

Points

Y

X

1.

187 697,00

1 213 888,00

2.

184 424,00

1 212 229,00

3.

178 076,00

1 218 876,00

4.

180 953,00

1 222 722,00

The above points are identified by means of coordinates in the system of coordinates of the Uniform Trigonometric Cadastral Network of the Slovak Republic.

Companies interested in the designation of an exploration area for flammable natural gas (hydrocarbons) may submit competing applications within 90 days from the publication of this notice. Applications received after that period will not be taken into consideration.

The Ministry of Environment of the Slovak Republic will take a decision on the applications no later than six months after the expiry of the period specified above and will notify all applicants of the results.

Applications must contain the basic particulars specified in Section 23(5) of Act No 569/2007 on geological works (Geological Act), as amended, as published in the Zbierka zákonov Slovenskej republiky (Collection of Laws of the Slovak Republic) on 25 October 2007, and information on the principal’s technical and financial capacity. Applications which do not contain such particulars will not be evaluated.

Applications for the designation of an exploration area are to be submitted in writing, in Slovak, in sealed envelope marked ‘Konkurenčný návrh PÚ Klenová’ to the following address:

| Ministerstvo životného prostredia Slovenskej republiky |
| --- |
| Sekcia geológie a prírodných zdrojov |
| Námestie Ľudovíta Štúra 1 |
| 812 35 Bratislava |
| SLOVENSKO/SLOVAKIA |

Ministerstvo životného prostredia Slovenskej republiky

Sekcia geológie a prírodných zdrojov

Námestie Ľudovíta Štúra 1

812 35 Bratislava

SLOVENSKO/SLOVAKIA

Detailed information is available from the State Geological Administration Department of the Slovak Ministry of the Environment (tel. +421 257783111/108).

E-mail: erika.benakova@enviro.gov.sk

---
#### George Edward HUFF, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 69-177.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Aug. 20, 1970.

Appeal from Court of Record, Broward County; J. Cail Lee, Judge.

Appeal dismissed.
1

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF IDAHO

Docket No. 41142

STATE OF IDAHO,

Plaintiff-Respondent,

v.

BRIAN JOSEPH STANDLEE,

Defendant-Appellant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

2014 Unpublished Opinion No. 346

Filed: February 4, 2014

Stephen W. Kenyon, Clerk

THIS IS AN UNPUBLISHED 

OPINION AND SHALL NOT 

BE CITED AS AUTHORITY

Appeal from the District Court of the Third Judicial District, State of Idaho, 

Canyon County. Hon. Molly J. Huskey, District Judge. 

Order denying I.C.R. 35 motion for reduction of sentence, affirmed.

Sara B. Thomas, State Appellate Public Defender; Shawn F. Wilkerson, Deputy 

Appellate Public Defender, Boise, for appellant. 

Hon. Lawrence G. Wasden, Attorney General; Lori A. Fleming, Deputy Attorney 

General, Boise, for respondent. 

________________________________________________

Before GUTIERREZ, Chief Judge; LANSING, Judge;

and MELANSON, Judge

PER CURIAM

Brian Joseph Standlee pled guilty to felony injury to a child. I.C. § 18-1501(1). The 

district court sentenced Standlee to a unified term of seven years, with a minimum period of 

confinement of two years, and retained jurisdiction. Following successful completion of the 

retained jurisdiction, the district court suspended the sentence and placed Standlee on probation. 

Standlee twice violated the terms of the probation, and the district court revoked probation, 

ordered execution of Standlee’s sentence, and again retained jurisdiction. Following Standlee’s 

second period of retained jurisdiction, the district court entered an order relinquishing 

jurisdiction. Standlee filed an untimely I.C.R 35 motion, which the district court denied. 

Standlee appeals.
2

Idaho Criminal Rule 35 provides that a district court has discretion to consider and act 

upon a motion filed within 120 days of the order relinquishing jurisdiction. The filing limitations 

provided by Rule 35 are a jurisdictional limit on the authority of the court to consider the motion 

and, unless filed within the period, a district court lacks jurisdiction to grant any relief. State v. 

Sutton, 113 Idaho 832, 833, 748 P.2d 416, 417 (Ct. App. 1987). In this case, Standlee 

acknowledges that his Rule 35 motion for reduction of sentence was untimely. Because 

Standlee’s Rule 35 motion was not filed within the 120-day limitation provided by the rule, the 

district court lacked jurisdiction to consider it. Accordingly, we do not address the merits of 

Richards’s Rule 35 motion. Therefore, the district court’s order denying Standlee’s Rule 35 

motion is affirmed.
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 24

                                POWER OF ATTORNEY


     Each director of MDU Communications International, Inc. (the "Company"),
whose signature appears below, hereby appoints Robert A. Biagioni as his
attorney to sign, in his name and behalf and in any and all capacities stated
below, the Company's Registration Statement on Form S-8 (the "Registration
Statement") for the registration of securities in connection with the exercise
and subsequent sale of employee benefit plan stock options, and likewise to sign
any and all amendments and other documents relating thereto as shall be
necessary to cause the Registration Statement to become effective (including
post-effective amendments), and to sign any and all such documents upon the
advice of legal counsel to carry out the exercise and sale of the option shares,
each such person hereby granting to such attorney power to act with or without
the other and full power of substitution and revocation, and hereby ratifying
all that such attorney or his substitute may do by virtue hereof.

     This Power of Attorney has been signed by the following persons in the
capacities indicated, on the 15th day of September, 2000.





             SIGNATURE                   TITLE

/s/      J.E. (Ted) Boyle                Director
------------------------------------
J.E. (Ted) Boyle

/s/        Robert Dyck                   Director
------------------------------------
Robert Dyck

/s/      Douglas G. Hooper               Director
------------------------------------
Douglas G. Hooper

/s/      Sheldon B. Nelson               Director, Chief
------------------------------------     Executive Officer and
Sheldon B. Nelson                        President
Calendar No. 493

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H.R. 3770

AN ACT

To designate the United States courthouse located

and Federal Building’’.house as the ‘‘Edward J. Schwartz Courthouseand the Federal building attached to the courtat 940 Front Street in San Diego, California,

JUNE 23 (legislative day, JUNE 7), 1994

Reported without amendment
II

Calendar No. 493

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H.R. 3770

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

APRIL 14 (legislative day, APRIL 11), 1994

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and

Public Works

JUNE 23 (legislative day, JUNE 7), 1994

Reported by Mr. BAUCUS, without amendment

AN ACT

To designate the United States courthouse located at 940

Front Street in San Diego, California, and the Federal

building attached to the courthouse as the ‘‘Edward J.

Schwartz Courthouse and Federal Building’’.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

4 The United States courthouse located at 940 Front

5 Street in San Diego, California, and the Federal building

6 attached to the courthouse shall be known and designated

7 as the ‘‘Edward J. Schwartz Courthouse and Federal

8 Building’’.
2

HR 3770 RS

1 SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

2 Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document,

3 paper, or other record of the United States to the court4 house and Federal building referred to in section 1 shall

5 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Edward J. Schwartz

6 Courthouse and Federal Building’’.

Passed the House of Representatives April 13, 1994.

Attest: DONNALD K. ANDERSON,

Clerk.
# C_2015010EN.01000301.xml

| 14.1.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 10/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.1.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 10/3

---

Notice of the impending expiry of certain countervailing measures

(2015/C 10/03)

1.   As provided for in Article 18(4) of Council Regulation (EC) No 597/2009 of 11 June 2009 on protection against subsidised imports from countries not members of the European Community (1), the European Commission gives notice that, unless a review is initiated in accordance with the following procedure, the countervailing measures mentioned below will expire on the date mentioned in the table below.

1

2.   Procedure

Procedure

Union producers may lodge a written request for a review. This request must contain sufficient evidence that the expiry of the measures would be likely to result in a continuation or recurrence of subsidisation and injury.

Should the Commission decide to review the measures concerned, importers, exporters, representatives of the exporting country and Union producers will then be provided with the opportunity to amplify, rebut or comment on the matters set out in the review request.

3.   Time limit

Time limit

Union producers may submit a written request for a review on the above basis, to reach the European Commission, Directorate-General for Trade (Unit H-1), CHAR 4/39, 1000 Brussels, Belgium (2) at any time from the date of the publication of the present notice but no later than three months before the date mentioned in the table below.

2

4.   This notice is published in accordance with Article 18(4) of Regulation (EC) No 597/2009.

| Product | Country(ies) of origin or exportation | Measures | Reference | Date of expiry (3) |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Certain polyethylene terephthalate | Iran
  Pakistan
  United Arab Emirates | Countervailing duty | Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 857/2010 (OJ L 254, 29.9.2010, p. 10). | 30.9.2015 |

Product

Country(ies) of origin or exportation

Measures

Reference

Date of expiry (3)

3

Certain polyethylene terephthalate

Iran

Pakistan

United Arab Emirates

Countervailing duty

Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 857/2010 (OJ L 254, 29.9.2010, p. 10).

30.9.2015

---

(1)  OJ L 188, 18.7.2009, p. 93.

1

(2)  Fax +32 22956505.

2

(3)  The measure expires at midnight of the day mentioned in this column.

3

---
No. 72-5971.

#### Stephenson *v.*United States.

Ct. App. D. C. Certiorari denied.
EXHIBIT 32.1

Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of The Singing Machine Company, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-K for the period ended March 31, 2003 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Yi Ping Chan, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Operating Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

Date: January 3, 2005               /s/ Yi Ping Chan
                                    ----------------

                                    Yi Ping Chan
                                    Chief Executive Officer and
                                    Chief Operating Officer
                                    (Principal Executive Officer)