alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Science Foundation

The National Science Board, pursuant to NSF regulations (45 CFR part 614), the National Science Foundation Act, as amended (42 U.S.C. 1862n-5), and the Government in the Sunshine Act (5 U.S.C. 552b), hereby gives notice of the scheduling of a teleconference for the transaction of National Science Board business, as follows:

# Time and Date: 

Closed teleconference of the National Science Board, to be held Tuesday, August 28, 2018 from 4:45 p.m. to 5:00 p.m. EDT.

# Place: 

This meeting will be held by teleconference at the National Science Foundation, 2415 Eisenhower Avenue, Alexandria, VA 22314.

# Status: 

Closed.

# Matters to be Considered: 

Chair's opening remarks; discussion of FY 2020 NSF, NSB, and OIG budget requests.

# Contact Person For More Information: 

                        Point of contact for this meeting is: Brad Gutierrez, 2415 Eisenhower Avenue, Alexandria, VA 22314. Telephone: (703) 292-7000. You may find meeting information and updates (time, place, subject matter or status of meeting) at                         *https://www.nsf.gov/​nsb/​meetings/​notices.jsp#sunshine*.                    

Chris Blair,

Executive Assistant to the National Science Board Office.

[FR Doc. 2018-18139 Filed 8-17-18; 4:15 pm]

 BILLING CODE 7555-01-P
<PAGE>
 
                                                                    Exhibit 23.3
                                                                                

                    CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

     We consent to the use of our reports dated January 22, 1999, except as to
Note 15 which is as of March 5, 1999, relating to the balance sheets of
Archstone Communties Trust as of December 31, 1998 and 1997, and the related
statements of earnings, shareholders' equity, and cash flows for each of the
years in the three-year period ended December 31, 1998, and the related
schedule, in the December 31, 1998, annual report on Form 10-K of Security
Capital Group Incorporated. Further, we consent to the incorporation by
reference of the aforementioned report into the registration statements filed by
Security Capital Group Incorporated on Form S-8 No's. 333-38521, 333-38523, 333-
38525, 333-38527, 333-38531, 333-38533, 333-38537, 333-48167, 333-38539, 333-
61395, Form S-4 No. 333-61401 and Form S-3 No. 333-64979.



                                                                        KPMG LLP



Chicago, Illinois
March 25, 1999
# C_2015191EN.01000801.xml

| 9.6.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 191/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.6.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 191/8

---

Notifications under Article 37 of Regulation (EC) No 562/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing a Community Code on the rules governing the movement of persons across borders (Schengen Borders Code)

The possibility for a Member State to provide by law for an obligation to hold or carry papers and documents pursuant to Article 21(c)

(2015/C 191/07)

POLAND

Amendment to the information provided by Poland and published in the Official Journal of the European Union C 18 of 24 January 2008

Amendment to the information provided by Poland and published in the Official Journal of the European Union C 18 of 24 January 2008

In accordance with Article 288 of the Aliens Act, during their stay in Poland aliens are required to hold a valid travel document and, if required, documents authorising them to stay or reside there. In accordance with Article 294 of the Aliens Act, aliens are required to present these documents during controls.

---
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

JUDGMENT

No. 04

- 13

- 00841

- CV

PILOT TRAVEL CENTERS LLC

, Appellant

v.

Norma GUTIERREZ

, Appellee

From the 49th Judicial District Court, Webb County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2013

- CV

- 000054

- D1

The Honorable Joe Lopez, Judge Presiding

BEFORE JUSTICE ANGELINI

, JUSTICE MARION , AND JUSTICE BARNARD

In accordance with the court’s memorandum opinion of this date, the parties’ joint motion to dismiss is GRANTED, and this appeal is DISMISSED. Costs of appeal are taxed against the parties who incurred them. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 42.1(d).

SIGNED February 1 9 , 2014.

_____________________________ Karen Angelini, Justice
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

MICHAEL OGRODNICK
, Appellant,

v.

MICHELLE OGRODNICK
, Appellee

.

No. 4D 21

- 2938

[ October 20, 2022 ]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm

Beach County ; Dina A. Keever

- Agrama , Judge; L.T. Case No.

502019DR008171XXXXNB

.

Troy W. Klein of Law Office of Troy W. Klein, P.A., West Palm Beach, for appellant.

No brief filed for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed.

L EVINE
, C ONNER and K UNTZ

, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
#### K. M., a Juvenile, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 72-1398.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

May 4, 1973.

Phillip A. Hubbart, Public Defender and John Lipinski, Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., and Joel D. Rosenblatt, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appel-lee.

Before BARKDULL, C. J., and PEARSON and HENDRY, JJ.

PEARSON, Judge.

The controlling question on this appeal is whether or not a juvenile judge may appoint a referee to conduct a trial of a juvenile upon the charge that the juvenile is a delinquent. The State suggests that the authority for such a procedure rests in Chapter 20808, Laws of Florida, 1941, where authorization of a referee who is an official or employee of the juvenile court is enunciated. There is a distinct question as to whether this enactment is still in effect. See Chapter 71-29, sections 2 and 3, Laws of Florida, 1971. However, we do not find it necessary to decide that question because references by a juvenile court to a referee for the purpose of trial are improper upon a much broader basis.

Since the enactment of Chapter 20808, Laws of Florida, 1941, the entire basis and even philosophy of juvenile proceedings has been changed in accordance with the holding of the United States Supreme Court that a trial of a juvenile partakes of the nature of a criminal proceeding rather than a proceeding in which the State is *parens patriae.*See V. v. City of New York, 407 U.S. 203, 92 S.Ct. 1951, 32 L.Ed. 2d 659 (1972); State v. V. D. B., Fla.1972, 270 So.2d 6. The legal effect of the recent holding of the Supreme Court of Florida in State v. V. D. B., supra, emphasizes the changed nature of the proceedings in cases involving juveniles. We hold, therefore, that the reference of appellant’s trial to a non-judicial officer was without authority and constitutes reversible error.

It should be noted that under amended Article V of the Constitution of 1968, the trial of all juveniles, except for traffic offenses, is conducted in the circuit court.1 Therefore, the question of references under Chapter 20808, Laws of Florida, 1941, which was applicable to the juvenile court is not likely to arise again. This is a delayed appeal allowed to appellant under the holding in Baggett v. Wainwright, Fla. 1969, 229 So.2d 239, and we conclude that in view of the lapse of time since the entry *578of the order appealed, a new trial would be impractical. Therefore, the cause is remanded with directions to discharge the appellant.

Reversed and remanded with directions to discharge the appellant.

1

. The new text of Article V, § 5, F.S.A., was adopted by the special election of March 14, 1972, and became effective January 1, 1973. See Fla.Stat. § 26.012 (2) (c), F.S.A., and Fla.Stat. § 39.01(1), F.S.A., which implement the new language of Article Y.
Exhibit 11

          CONVERSION TECHNOLOGIES INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

                STATEMENT OF COMPUTATION OF NET (LOSS) PER SHARE

               For the years ended June 30, 1999 and June 30, 1998

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                    Year Ended       Year Ended
                                                   June 30, 1999    June 30, 1998
                                                   -------------    -------------
<S>                                                <C>               <C>
Loss before extraordinary item                     $ (2,105,748)     $ (8,666,278)

Preferred Stock dividends                            (1,182,102)       (3,032,318)
                                                   ------------------------------
Loss before extraordinary item attributable to
common stockholders                                $ (3,287,850)     $(11,698,596)
                                                   ==============================

Weighted average number of
   common shares outstanding                          5,133,200         4,804,427
                                                   ==============================

Loss per common share before
  extraordinary item                               $      (0.64)     $      (2.44)
                                                   ==============================

Extraordinary item                                 $         --      $  6,425,004
                                                   ==============================

Income per share from extraordinary item           $         --      $       1.34
                                                   ==============================

Net loss                                           $ (2,105,748)     $ (2,241,274)

Preferred stock dividends                            (1,182,102)       (3,032,318)
                                                   ------------------------------

Net loss attributable to common stockholders       $ (3,287,850)     $ (5,273,592)
                                                   ==============================

Net loss per common share                          $      (0.64)     $       1.10
                                                   ==============================
</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 01-6176

FRED ARISTOTLE DAVIS, JR., Plaintiff - Appellant, versusCHARLENE DAY, Assistant Public Defender, Commonwealth of Virginia; DAVID HICKS, Commonwealth Attorney for Commonwealth of Virginia, Defendants - Appellees.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, District Judge. (CA-00-627-3) Submitted: April 27, 2001 Decided: May 4, 2001Before LUTTIG and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Fred Aristotle Davis, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Fred Aristotle Davis, Jr., appeals the district court’s orderdenying relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Davis v. Day , No. CA-00-627-3 (E.D. Va. Jan. 3, 2001). We dispense with oral argument becausethe facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
#### Henry Fisher MIRANDA, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 72-704.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

June 27, 1973.

James A. Gardner, Public Defender, and Elliott C. Metcalfe, Jr., Asst. Public Defender, Bradenton, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Charles Corees, Jr., Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

LILES and HOBSON, JJ., concur.

MANN, C. J., concurs specially, with opinion.

MANN, Chief Judge

(concurring specially).

I concur specially for reasons stated in my concurring opinion in Latson v. State, Fla.App.1973, 276 So.2d 496. See also my *343opinion in Wright v. State, Fla.App.1972, 269 So.2d 17, and my dissenting opinion in Carmen v. State, Case No. 72-235, opinion filed April 27, 1973, not yet reported.
Exhibit 32.1



Certification of Principal Executive
Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

As Adopted Pursuant To Section 906 of

The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



In connection with the accompanying quarterly
report on Form 10-Q of Staffing 360 Solutions, Inc. for the quarter ended February 28, 2013, I, Allan Hartley Chief Executive Officer
of Staffing 360 Solutions, Inc., hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that:



|1. | Such quarterly report of Form 10-Q for the quarter ended February 28, 2013, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                                
|-- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|  
|2. | The information contained in such quarterly report of Form 10-Q for the quarter ended February 28, 2013, fairly represents in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Staffing 360 Solutions, Inc.



|Dated:   April 15, 2013 | /s/ Allan Hartley            
|----------------------- | -----------------------------
|                        | Chief Executive Officer      
|                        | (Principal Executive Officer)
# C_2015425EN.01002101.xml

| 18.12.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 425/21 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.12.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 425/21

---

Notice concerning the expiry of Council Regulation (EC) No 1340/2008 on trade in certain steel products between the European Community and the Republic of Kazakhstan

(2015/C 425/14)

As provided for in Article 17 of Council Regulation (EC) No 1340/2008 of 8 December 2008 on trade in certain steel products between the European Community and the Republic of Kazakhstan (1), the European Commission gives notice that Council Regulation (EC) No 1340/2008 expired on 30 November 2015 following Kazakhstan’s accession to the World Trade Organisation on this date.

1

---

(1)  OJ L 348, 24.12.2008, p. 1.

1

---
#### Troy Dennis SPRADLEY, Appellant, v. Curt SELPH, Appellee.

No. 72-1038.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Feb. 20, 1973.

Appeal dismissed.
# C_2015367EN.01001103.xml

| 5.11.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 367/11 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.11.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 367/11

---

EURATOM SUPPLY AGENCY

Publication of the final accounts for the financial year 2014

(2015/C 367/42)

The complete version of the final accounts may be found at the following address:

http://ec.europa.eu/euratom/accounts.html

---
#### INSURED LLOYDS et al., Plaintiff-Appellee, v. RANGER COUNTY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY et al., Defendant-Appellant.

No. 2308.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana. Third Circuit.

June 18, 1968.

Patin & Patin, by John A. Patin, Lake Charles, for defendant-appellant.

Dubuisson & Dubuisson, by Jimmy Dau-zat and James T. Guglielmo, Opelousas, for plaintiff-appellee.

Before FRUGÉ, SAVOY, and HOOD, JJ-

FRUGÉ, Judge.

For the reasons given in Wallace M. Dahlquist v. Canal Insurance Company, Clifton Auzenne, Clarence Batiste, Ranger County Mutual Insurance Company and Melvin Steely, 212 So.2d 246 (La.App.3d Cir., 1968), No. 2307 on our docket, consolidated herewith for trial purposes, the judgment of the trial court in this case is affirmed at appellants’ costs.

Affirmed.

HOOD, J., concurs for the reasons assigned in his dissenting opinion in Dahlquist v. Canal Insurance Co., 212 So.2d 246.
# C_2013089EN.01000101.xml

| 27.3.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 89/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.3.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 89/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.6643 — Uniqa/Dekra/Dekra-Expert)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2013/C 89/01

On 20 March 2013, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in German and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32013M6643. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32013M6643. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.

---
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002











The undersigned, Timothy J. Neher, the Chief Executive Officer, Chairman of the Board of Directors and Treasurer of ACCELERATED ACQUISITIONS XIV, INC. (the “Company”), DOES HEREBY CERTIFY that:





1.  The Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended December 31, 2010 (the “Report”), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.  Information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.





IN WITNESS WHEREOF, each of the undersigned has executed this statement this 15th day of February, 2011.











/s/ Timothy J. NeherTimothy J. NeherChief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to ACCELERATED ACQUISITIONS XIV, INC. and will be retained by ACCELERATED ACQUISITIONS XIV, INC. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<PAGE>


                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.2


                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

The Board of Directors
Troy Group, Inc.

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statement on Form S-3 of our report dated January 14, 2000, with respect to
the financial statements of Troy Group, Inc. included in such Company's
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended November 30, 1999, as amended.
We also consent to the references to us in this Registration Statement under
the heading "Experts."



                                                     MCGLADREY & PULLEN, LLP

                                                     /s/ MCGLADREY & PULLEN, LLP


Anaheim, California
August 17, 2000
Exhibit 32.1

















CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. Section 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In connection with the Quarterly Report of Acroboo, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q/A-1 for the period ended March 31, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date here of (the “report”), I, Daniel R. Furlong, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated this 8th day of August, 2013.








DANIEL R. FURLONGDaniel R. FurlongChief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Spirit of Texas Bancshares, Inc. (the “Company”) for the quarter ended March 31, 2018 (the “Report”), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

|   | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

| Date:     June 1, 2018 |   | By:    | /s/ Jeffrey A. Powell      |
|--------------------------------------------|--------|--------|---------------------------------|
|                                       |   |   | Jeffrey A. Powell               |
|                                       |   |   | EVP and Chief Financial Officer |
1

The Honorable J. Leon Holmes, Chief Judge, United States District Court for

the Eastern District of Arkansas. 

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 05-3818

___________

Kenny E. Goodwin, *

*

Appellant, *

* Appeal from the United States

v. * District Court for the Eastern

* District of Arkansas.

Thomas J. Ridge, Secretary, *

Department of Homeland *

Security, * [UNPUBLISHED]

*

Appellee. *

___________

Submitted: November 7, 2006

Filed: November 30, 2006 

___________

Before MURPHY, BYE, and MELLOY, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Kenny E. Goodwin appeals the district court’s1

 adverse grant of summary

judgment in his Title VII suit claiming race discrimination against the United States

Department of Homeland Security. Having carefully reviewed the record and

considered Goodwin’s arguments, see Jacob-Mua v. Veneman, 289 F.3d 517, 520 (8th
-2-

Cir. 2002) (de novo standard of review), we find no basis for reversal. Accordingly,

we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. 

______________________________