alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA

Present: Judges Coleman, Koontz and Willis Argued at Salem, Virginia

DICKIE DARNELL DICKENS

v. Record No. 0382-94-3 MEMORANDUM OPINION * BY JUDGE JERE M. H. WILLIS, JR. CITY OF DANVILLE MAY 9, 1995

FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE CITY OF DANVILLE Kenneth M. Covington, Judge Designate Glenn L. Berger (Shreve & Berger, on brief), for appellant. Robert L. Adams, Jr., Assistant Commonwealth's Attorney (William H. Fuller, III, Commonwealth's Attorney, on brief), for appellee.

Dickie Darnell Dickens was charged and convicted of driving while under the influence of alcohol, pursuant to Danville City Ordinance § 21-49.3. Citing Code § 15.1-132, he contends that the ordinance was void at the time of his arrest because it imposed a lesser punishment than that prescribed by general law, Code § 18.2-270. We disagree and affirm the judgment of the trial court. Dickens was arrested and charged on August 10, 1993. On that date, Danville City Ordinance § 21-49.3 incorporated by reference the penalty provided by Code § 18.2-270 effective July 1, 1992. Effective July 1, 1993, Code § 18.2-270 was amended to provide an enhanced penalty for an offense committed while the

* Pursuant to Code § 17-116.010 this opinion is not designated for publication.- 2 - accused was "transporting a person seventeen years of age or younger." The Danville ordinance was not changed to reflect this amendment until November 16, 1993. Thus, at the time of Dickens's arrest, the Danville ordinance did not provide for the July 1, 1993 enhanced penalty. Dickens was charged and convicted of the simple offense of driving while under the influence of alcohol. Nothing in the record suggests that at the time of the offense he was transporting a person seventeen years of age or younger. Thus, the enhanced penalty provided by the July 1, 1993 statutory amendment did not apply to him. An accused may challenge only the part of an ordinance that applies to his case. See Sos v. Commonwealth , 14 Va. App. 862, 865, 419 S.E.2d 426, 428 (1992). The Danville ordinance, insofar as it applied to Dickens's case, conformed to corresponding general law. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed. Affirmed

.
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3779 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 3779

    To end the purchase of House calendars, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 2, 1994

 Mr. Inglis of South Carolina introduced the following bill; which was 
           referred to the Committee on House Administration

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To end the purchase of House calendars, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act shall be cited as the ``End Purchase of House Calendars 
Act''.

SEC. 2. END PURCHASE OF HOUSE CALENDARS.

    No funds shall be appropriated for the purchase of House calendars 
from the Capitol Historical Society or any other source and no funds 
shall be used in administering or distributing House calendars for 
fiscal year 1995 and any future fiscal years.

SEC. 3. CALENDAR MAILING.

    No funds shall be appropriated for the mailing of calendars and no 
funds shall be used in administering the mailing of calendars for 
fiscal year 1995 and any future fiscal years.

                                 <all>
```
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

PAUL ALEXANDER WADE, III,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 295 WAL 2023

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 14th day of May, 2024, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.

Justice McCaffery did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
UNAUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF BIDHIT.COM, INC. AS OF AND FOR THE SIX MONTHS
ENDED JUNE 30, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                       1,482,962
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   26,784
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    155,569
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             3,855,802
<PP&E>                                         224,752
<DEPRECIATION>                                  17,425
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              11,657,261
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          406,503
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        18,779
<OTHER-SE>                                  16,460,093
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                11,657,261
<SALES>                                        178,062
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               182,502
<CGS>                                          161,256
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                3,045,010
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,416
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (2,832,647)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (2,832,647)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (2,832,647)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.20)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.20)


</TABLE>
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 14**  **- 7829** 

BILLY CARL ADAMS , Plaintiff

– Appellant ,
v. CHADWICK PHILLIPS, T. Probation and Parole, District 28; DOUGLAS A. IRVING, Supervisor District 28, Radford, VA; MELISSA DANCY HENDERSON, Probation and Parole, District 16; SAMUEL D. ARNOLD, Chief Probation and Parole Officer, District 15; BRENT W. DUNCAN, Probation and Parole Officer, District 15; ABBY H. FEDOR, Deputy Chief Probation and Parole Officer , District 15 , Defendants

- Appellees
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia , at Roanoke
. James P. Jones, Jr. , District Judge. ( 7:14

- cv - 00506

- JPJ

- RSB )

Submitted : April 16, 2015 Decided: April 20, 2015

Before AGEE and KEENAN , Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion
. Billy Carl Adams, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Billy Carl Adams appeals the district court ’ s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (20 12 ) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Ada ms v. Phillips , No. 7:14

- cv - 00506

- JP J

- RSB (W.D. Va. Nov. 17, 2014)
. We deny Adams’ motion for appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before th is court and a rgument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Exhibit
13.2







PRINCIPAL
FINANCIAL OFFICER CERTIFICATION


PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350







In
connection with this Annual Report of CalPetro Tankers (Bahamas II) Limited (the
"Company") on Form 20-F for the annual period ended December 31, 2008, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "SEC") on or about the date
hereof (the "Report"), I, Kate Blankenship, the Principal Financial Officer of
the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:







(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.





A signed
original of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be
retained by the Company and furnished to the SEC or its staff upon
request.







Date:  May
20, 2009







/s/Kate
Blankenship


Kate
Blankenship


Principal
Financial Officer
<PAGE>

                                   EXHIBIT 21

                           SUBSIDIARIES OF REGISTRANT
                            YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2000


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                        State or                Percentage
                                                                      Jurisdiction               of Voting
                                                                    of Incorporation         Securities Owned
                                                                    ----------------         ----------------
Subsidiaries
------------
<S>                                                                 <C>                      <C>
AiC Analysts Limited                                                 United Kingdom               100.0%

Sequoia NET.com                                                         Michigan                   80.1%
</TABLE>










                                      25
Exhibit 16.1

Securities and Exchange Commission
Washington D.C. 20549

Ladies
and Gentlemen:

We
were previously independent accountants for EPIQ Systems, Inc. and, under the date of February 25, 2000, we reported on the financial statements of EPIQ Systems, Inc. as of and
for the years ended December 31, 1999 and 1998. On September 27, 2000 our appointment as independent accountants was terminated. We have read EPIQ Systems, Inc. statements
included under Item 4 of its Form 8-K dated October 3, 2000, and we agree with such statements except that we are not in a position to agree or disagree with EPIQ
Systems, Inc.'s statements that (a) the change was recommended by the audit committee and approved by the board of directors, and, (b) Deloitte & Touche LLP was not
engaged regarding the application of accounting principles to a specified transaction or the type of audit opinion that might be rendered on EPIQ Systems, Inc.'s financial statements.



October 3,
2000
Kansas City, Missouri

- 3 -

---
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Stephen J. Markman, Chief Justice

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano 

Richard H. Bernstein

Kurtis T. Wilder

Elizabeth T. Clement, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 September 12, 2018

d0905

Order 

Clerk

September 12, 2018

156400

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 156400

COA: 337265

St. Clair CC: 08-001351-FC

DONALD ROBERT BURKE,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the July 7, 2017 order of 

the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that 

the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3453 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3453

 To amend the Drug-Free Schools and Communities Act of 1986 to provide 
           for the continuation of the programs of such Act.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            November 4, 1993

  Mr. Owens introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                    Committee on Education and Labor

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Drug-Free Schools and Communities Act of 1986 to provide 
           for the continuation of the programs of such Act.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Drug-Free Schools and Communities 
Act Amendments of 1993''.

SEC. 2. AUTHORIZATIONS OF APPROPRIATIONS FOR PROGRAMS OF DRUG-FREE 
              SCHOOLS AND COMMUNITIES ACT OF 1986.

    (a) In General.--Section 5111(a)(1) of the Drug-Free Schools and 
Communities Act of 1986 (42 U.S.C. 3181(a)(1)) is amended--
            (1) by striking ``and'' after ``1989,''; and
            (2) by inserting before the period the following: ``, and 
        such sums as may be necessary for each of the fiscal years 1994 
        through 1998''.
    (b) Training of Teachers, Counselors, and School Personnel; 
Emergency Grants.--Section 5111(a)(2)(A) of the Drug-Free Schools and 
Communities Act of 1986 (42 U.S.C. 3181(a)(2)(A)) is amended--
            (1) by striking ``and'' after ``1989,''; and
            (2) by inserting before the period the following: ``, and 
        such sums as may be necessary for each of the fiscal years 1994 
        through 1998''.
    (c) Emergency Grants.--Section 5111(a)(3) of the Drug-Free Schools 
and Communities Act of 1986 (42 U.S.C. 3181(a)(3)) is amended by 
inserting before the period the following: ``, and such sums as may be 
necessary for each of the fiscal years 1994 through 1998''.

                                 <all>
```
Calendar No. 363

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 3617

[Report No. 103–224]

AN ACT

To amend the Everglades National Park Protection

poses.and Expansion Act of 1989, and for other purFEBRUARY 7 (legislative day, JANUARY 25), 1994

Reported without amendment
II

Calendar No. 363

103D CONGRESS

2ND SESSION H. R. 3617

[Report No. 103–224]

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

NOVEMBER 23, 1993

Received

NOVEMBER 24 (legislative day, NOVEMBER 23), 1993

Read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources

FEBRUARY 7 (legislative day, JANUARY 25), 1994

Reported by Mr. JOHNSTON, without amendment

AN ACT

To amend the Everglades National Park Protection and

Expansion Act of 1989, and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That section 104 of the Everglades National Park Protec4 tion and Expansion Act of 1989 (16 U.S.C. 410r–8) is

5 hereby amended by adding at the end thereof the following

6 new subsection:
2

HR 3617 RS

1 ‘‘(k)(1) Notwithstanding any other provision of this

2 Act, the Secretary is authorized to use funds appropriated

3 pursuant to this Act, including any available funds appro4 priated to the National Park Service for construction in

5 the Department of the Interior and Related Agencies Ap6 propriations Acts for fiscal years 1991 through 1994 for

7 project modifications by the Army Corps of Engineers, in

8 such amounts as determined by the Secretary, to provide

9 Federal assistance to the State of Florida (including polit10 ical subdivisions of the State) for acquisition of lands de11 scribed in paragraph (4).

12 ‘‘(2) With respect to any lands acquired pursuant to

13 this subsection, the Secretary may provide not more than

14 25 percent of the total cost of such acquisition.

15 ‘‘(3) All funds made available pursuant to this sub16 section shall be transferred to the State of Florida or a

17 political subdivision of the State, subject to an agreement

18 that any lands acquired with such funds will be managed

19 in perpetuity for the restoration of natural flows to the

20 park or Florida Bay.

21 ‘‘(4) The lands referred to in paragraph (1) are those

22 lands or interests therein adjacent to, or affecting the res23 toration of natural water flows to, the park or Florida Bay

24 which are located east of the park and known as the Frog
3

HR 3617 RS

1 Pond, Rocky Glades Agricultural Area, and the Eight-and2 One-Half Square-Mile Area.’’.

Passed the House of Representatives November 23

(legislative day, November 22), 1993.

Attest: DONNALD K. ANDERSON,

Clerk.
★

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 3839

AN ACT

To designate the United States Post Office building located

at 220 South 40th Avenue in Hattiesburg, Mississippi,

as the ‘‘Roy M. Wheat Post Office’’.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

4 The United States Post Office building located at 220

5 South 40th Avenue in Hattiesburg, Mississippi, shall be

6 known and designated as the ‘‘Roy M. Wheat Post Of7 fice’’.

8 SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

9 Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document,

10 paper, or other record of the United States to the building
2

HR 3839 EH1S

1 referred to in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference

2 to the Roy M. Wheat Post Office.

Passed the House of Representatives May 23, 1994.

Attest:

Clerk.
103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 3839

AN ACT

To designate the United States Post Office building

Office’’.burg, Mississippi, as the ‘‘Roy M. Wheat Postlocated at 220 South 40th Avenue in Hatties-
H. R. 3770

One Hundred Third Congress

of the

United States of America

AT THE SECOND SESSION

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,

the twenty-fifth day of January, one thousand nine hundred and ninety-four

An Act

To designate the United States courthouse located at 940 Front Street in San

Diego, California, and the Federal building attached to the courthouse as the

‘‘Edward J. Schwartz Courthouse and Federal Building’’.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

The United States courthouse located at 940 Front Street in

San Diego, California, and the Federal building attached to the

courthouse shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Edward J.

Schwartz Courthouse and Federal Building’’.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper,

or other record of the United States to the courthouse and Federal

building referred to in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference

to the ‘‘Edward J. Schwartz Courthouse and Federal Building’’.

Speaker of the House of Representatives.

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
<PAGE>
                                                                EXHIBIT 10.208.3

                        AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT

                                                                February 9, 2005

Lowell W. Paxson
525 S. Flagler Drive
West Palm Beach, Florida 33401

Dear Bud:

     Reference is made to the Employment Agreement dated October 16, 1999 (as
amended, the "Agreement") by and between Paxson Communications Management
Company, Inc. ("Paxson") and Lowell W. Paxson ("Employee"). Capitalized terms
used and not otherwise defined herein have the respective meanings assigned
thereto in the Agreement.

     Section 3.02(a)(i) of the Agreement is hereby amended and restated in its
entirety as follows:

          "Commencing on the date which is six (6) months and one (1) day after
     the termination date and continuing in effect for a period equal to the
     number of Severance Months specified in Schedule I hereto, Employee will
     receive the Employee's Base Salary as in effect on the date of
     termination;"

     All other terms and conditions of the Agreement remain the same. If the
foregoing correctly sets forth your understanding of our intentions with respect
to the matters set forth above, please indicate by executing a copy of this
amendment as provided below and returning the same to us.

                                        Paxson Communications Management
                                        Company, Inc.


                                        By /s/ Dean M. Goodman
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           Name: Dean M. Goodman
                                           Title: President and
                                                  Chief Operating Officer


Accepted and Agreed as of this
10th day of February, 2005:


/s/ Lowell W. Paxson
-------------------------------------
    Lowell W. Paxson
#### William Ross HORNSBY, Appellant, v. Claire A. HORNSBY, Appellee.

No. 71-996.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

March 14, 1972.

Rehearing Denied April 12, 1972.

William Ross Hornsby, in pro. per.

Alex E. Carlson, Miami Springs, for ap-pellee.

Before BARKDULL, C. J., and PEARSON and HENDRY, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See: Ch. 71-241, General Laws of Florida, 1971.