alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Balance
Sheet, Statement of Operations, Statements of Cash Flows and Notes thereto
incorporated in Part I, Item 1 of this Form 10-K and is qualifed in its entirety
by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                          49,288
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,127,970
<ALLOWANCES>                                    19,900
<INVENTORY>                                    424,806
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,813,098
<PP&E>                                          16,447
<DEPRECIATION>                                 144,234
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,379,335
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,414,595
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        24,984
<OTHER-SE>                                     964,740
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,379,335
<SALES>                                      9,547,816
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             9,547,816
<CGS>                                        7,029,359
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,544,806
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               219,495
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             225,533
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                764,156
<INCOME-TAX>                                 (170,000)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            924,156
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   924,156
<EPS-BASIC>                                    0.373
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    0.356


</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3839 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 3839

 To designate the United States Post Office located at 220 South 40th 
    Avenue in Hattiesburg, Mississippi, as the ``Roy M. Wheat Post 
                               Office''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 10, 1994

Mr. Taylor of Mississippi (for himself, Mr. Parker, and Mr. Montgomery) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                     Post Office and Civil Service

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To designate the United States Post Office located at 220 South 40th 
    Avenue in Hattiesburg, Mississippi, as the ``Roy M. Wheat Post 
                               Office''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The United States Post Office located at 220 South 40th Avenue in 
Hattiesburg, Mississippi, shall be known and designated as the ``Roy M. 
Wheat Post Office''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the post office referred to in section 1 
shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Roy M. Wheat Post Office''.

                                 <all>
```
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS





We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration
statement of Cooperative Bankshares, Inc. on Form S-8 (File No.
333-22335) of our report dated January 30, 1998, on our
audits of the consolidated financial statements of Cooperative
Bankshares, Inc. as of December 31, 1997 and 1996, and for each
of the three years in the period ended December 31, 1997, which
is incorporated by reference in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.




/s/ Coopers & Lybrand L.L.P.

Raleigh, North Carolina
March 30, 1998
#### Clara M. COUNCIL, as Legal Guardian of Carla Jean Walker, a minor, Appellants, v. Frances FRANCE and L. T. France, Appellees.

No. R-127.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

April 24, 1973.

R. Brownlee Eggart, Pensacola, for appellants.

Robert P. Gaines of Beggs, Lane, Daniel, Gaines & Davis, Pensacola, for appel-lees.

SPECTOR, Chief Judge.

Clara Council, as guardian of Carla Jean Walker, seeks review of a summary final judgment by which the lower court held that she could not maintain an action for the wrongful death of Carla’s father. Arthur Floyd Walker was killed in an automobile accident involving a car owned by L. T. France and driven by Frances France. Carla’s mother had predeceased Arthur Walker and subsequently he married Hazel Walker. After Arthur’s death, Hazel Walker instituted a suit for wrongful death which was settled. By the settlement, Hazel released all claims individually and as administratrix of the estate of Arthur Walker in exchange for which she received $100,000 for bodily injury and death and $920 damage to the automobile.

The only issue on appeal is whether the guardian of the child can maintain an action for wrongful death of the minor’s father in a case filed after Garner v. Ward, 251 So.2d 252 (Fla.1971), where the father’s widow had settled a case prior to that decision.

Before the Supreme Court’s decision in Garner, supra, the surviving children of a first marriage were left without a remedy for a parent wrongfully killed if a second wife survived. However, the court in Garner held that all persons who suffer loss as a result of the wrongful death and who are entitled to recover are proper parties. Subsequent to Garner, the legislature repealed Section 768.01, 768.02 and 768.03, Florida Statutes, F.S.A., and enacted Section 768.20 and 768.21, Florida Statutes, F. S.A., in order to conform to the Supreme Court’s holding in Garner and which was to become effective July 1, 1972.

In the case at bar, Arthur Walker was killed on May 10, 1970, and a settlement of claims was reached on May 5, 1971, between the second wife and appellee, two months prior to the court’s decision in Garner. The instant action was filed November 29, 1971.

At the time appellees paid $KL,000 to Hazel Walker, it was the well settled law of this State that she was the only one entitled to compensation for the death of Ar*491thur Walker. It is our opinion that appel-lee having relied on well settled law in making its earlier settlement should not now be required to pay an additional sum because of the intervening court decision. In the Garner case, there had been no final settlement or judgment in that the minors appealed from an order denying their intervention in the wrongful death suit. In the cáse at bar, Hazel Walker released ap-pellees from liability and they rightfully believed that they had fully compensated for the wrong. We believe that they should not be confronted with successive lawsuits brought after statutory changes imposing upon them additional liability.

For the foregoing reasons, the judgment appealed from is affirmed.

WIGGINTON and CARROLL, DONALD K., JJ., concur.
EXHIBIT 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. {section} 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of China Rising Star Limited (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Jeremy Mork, Chief Executive and Financial  Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. {section} 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes- Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



|Dated:  November 19, 2010
By  /s/ Jeremy Mork
-----------------------------
    Jeremy Mork
    Chief Executive and  Financial Officer
   (Principal Executive and Financial Officer)
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
#### Rosana Wagner, *et al.,*Appellants, *vs.*George Phillips, *et al.,*Respondents.

1. *Sales, inadequacy of prize, eta.*— Inadequacy of price taken by itself is not sufficient ground for setting aside a sale of land, but, when coupled with other facts it is a circumstance entitled to consideration.

2. *Lands, sale of*— Bidders *kept away*— Competition *repressed, eta.*— Where evidence shows that by the acts, connivance and representations of a purchaser, bidders were kept away from the sale of certain land; that competition was repressed when the sale took place, and that, except for these practices the land would have brought a price greatly in excess of that actually realized, the sale will be set aside.

*Jippealfrom Shelby Circuit Court.*

*James Carr,*for Appellant.

*E. R. Burlingame,*for Respondent.

Wagner, Judge,

delivered the opinion of the court.

This was a proceeding commenced in the Shelby Circuit Court, to set aside a sale by the' sheriff, in partition, on the ground that the purchaser, who is the respondent here, by means of fraudulent practices and representations, deterred and kept away bidders; and, in consequence thereof, bought the property at a greatly inadequate price. The land sold consisted of one hundred and sixty acres, and was purchased by the respondent for the sum of one hundred and eight dollars ; and the testimony all goes to show that it was worth from six to eight hundred dollars. The inadequacy of the price, taken by itself, would not be sufficient ground for affording relief; but when coupled with other facts, it is a circumstance entitled to consideration.

The record clearly shows that, by the acts, connivance and . representations of the respondent, bidders were kept away from the sale, and competition was repressed when the sale took place; and that had it not been for these improper practices, the land would have brought at least, six hundred dollars.

The sale, therefore, should not be upheld. The judgment must be reversed and the cause remanded.

The other judges concur.
Exhibit 32.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with this Quarterly Report of WTTJ Corp, on Form 10-Q for the Quarter ending September 30, 2014 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Kris Kottmeier, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify to the best of my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (1) Such Annual Report on Form 10-Q for the nine months ending September 30, 2014, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and September 30, 2014 fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of WTTJ Corp.  July 27, 2015By:/s/ Kris KottmeierKris KottmeierChairman, President and Chief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer)
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

June 5, 2024

No. 04

- 23

- 00396

- CR

EX PARTE Eric Ruben CALDERON

From the County Court

, Kinney County, Texas

Trial Court No. 11041CR

Honorable Susan D. Reed , Judge Presiding

ORDER

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, we DISMISS Eric Ruben Calderon’s appeal of the denial of his application for pretrial writ of habeas corpus for want of jurisdiction. We further consider Calderon’s appeal as a petition for writ of mand amus and DENY his request

for mandamus relief WITHOUT PREJUDICE

. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 52.8(a).

It is so ORDERED on June 5, 2024

.

_____________________________ Patricia O. Alvarez , Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 5th day of June, 2024

.

_____________________________ Luz Estrada , Chief Deputy Clerk
251 La. 678.

#### Charles L. VINING, Jr. v. The DEMOCRATIC EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE FOR the 32ND REPRESENTATIVE DISTRICT, its individual members, and the Honorable Wade O. Martin, Jr., Secretary of State.

No. 48993.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Dec. 8, 1967.

In re: The Democratic Executive Committee for the 32nd Representative District, its individual members, and the Honorable Wade O. Martin, Jr., Secretary of State, applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Second Circuit, Parish of East Carroll. 204 So.2d 801.

Writ refused. We find no error of law in the judgment of the Court of Appeal.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Stephen J. Markman, Chief Justice

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano 

Richard H. Bernstein

Kurtis T. Wilder

Elizabeth T. Clement, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 October 24, 2018

s1017

Order 

Clerk

October 24, 2018

157234

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 157234

COA: 335383

Iosco CC: 15-009390-FC

CHAD MICHAEL CARPENTER,

Defendant-Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the January 9, 2018 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.
Exhibit 21.1

Subsidiaries
of the Company.

AnywhereMD.com, Inc.
(California)
MedicaLogic of Texas, Inc. (Delaware)
MedicaLogic S.A. (Switzerland)
Medscape, Inc. (Delaware)
Medscape Enterprises, Inc. (Delaware)
Medscape Pennsylvania, LLC (Delaware)
Medscape Portals, Inc. (Delaware)
Medscape Texas, LP (Texas)
Medscape U.K. Limited (U.K.)
Total eMed, Inc. (Delaware)
Total eMed of Tennessee, Inc. (Tennessee)
Total eMed Leasing Company, LLC (Tennessee)
Total eMed Financing Co., Inc. (Tennessee)

---
Exhibit 21.1

Subsidiaries



|                                            |  |                             
|------------------------------------------- |  | ----------------------------
|Name                                        |  | Jurisdiction of Organization
|Standard Casualty Company                   |  | Texas                       
|Standard Insurance Agency, Inc.             |  | Texas                       
|CountryPlace Mortgage, Ltd.                 |  | Texas                       
|Magic Living, Inc.                          |  | Nevada                      
|Palm Harbor Marketing, Inc.                 |  | Nevada                      
|Palm Harbor Manufacturing, L.P.             |  | Texas                       
|Palm Harbor GenPar, L.L.C.                  |  | Nevada                      
|Palm Harbor Insurance Agency of Texas, Inc. |  | Texas                       
|Nationwide Homes, Incorporated              |  | Delaware                    
|CountryPlace Acceptance Corporation         |  | Nevada                      
|CountryPlace Acceptance GP, LLC             |  | Texas                       
|CountryPlace Acceptance LP, LLC             |  | Delaware                    
|CountryPlace Funding, Inc.                  |  | Delaware                    
|Palm Harbor Albemarle, LLC                  |  | Delaware                    
|Palm Harbor Delaware, Inc.                  |  | Delaware                    
|CountryPlace Securitization, LLC            |  | Delaware                    
|CountryPlace Holdings, LLC                  |  | Delaware
#### George WHITFORD, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

No. 73-699.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

July 10, 1973.

Rehearing Denied Aug. 13, 1973.

Appeal dismissed.
# C_2016067EN.01002001.xml

| 20.2.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 67/20 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.2.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 67/20

---

Corrigendum to Notice of initiation of an anti-dumping proceeding concerning imports of certain stainless steel tube and pipe butt-welding fittings, whether or not finished, originating in the People’s Republic of China and Taiwan

(
  Official Journal of the European Union C 357 of 29 October 2015
  )

Official Journal of the European Union C 357 of 29 October 2015

(2016/C 67/08)

On page 5, point 2. Product under investigation:

for:

for:

‘The product subject to this investigation is tube and pipe butt-welding fittings, of austenitic stainless steel grades used for corrosion-resistant applications, corresponding to (according to AISI A269) WP 304, 304L, 316, 316L, 316Ti, 321 and 321H and their equivalent in the other norms, with a greatest external diameter not exceeding 406,4 mm and a wall thickness of 16 mm or less, whether or not finished (“the product under investigation”).’,

read:

read:

‘The product subject to this investigation is tube and pipe butt-welding fittings, of austenitic stainless steel grades used for corrosion-resistant applications corresponding to AISI types 304, 304L, 316, 316L, 316Ti, 321 and 321H and their equivalent in the other norms, with a greatest external diameter not exceeding 406,4 mm and a wall thickness of 16 mm or less, whether or not finished (“the product under investigation”).’.

---
# C_2015229EN.01001201.xml

| 14.7.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 229/12 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.7.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 229/12

---

Commission notice pursuant to Article 16(4) of Regulation (EC) No 1008/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council on common rules for the operation of air services in the Community

Changes to public service obligations in respect of scheduled air services

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2015/C 229/08)

| Member State | France |
| --- | --- |
| Route concerned | Rodez (Aveyron) – Paris (Orly) |
| Original date of entry into force of the public service obligations | 1 June 1997 |
| Date of entry into force of the changes | The day after the publication of this notice |
| Address from which the text and any relevant information and/or documentation relating to the public service obligation can be obtained | Arrêté du 10 juin 2015 modifiant les obligations de service public imposées sur les services aériens entre Rodez et Paris (Orly) [Decree of 10 June 2015 amending the public service obligations imposed on air services between Rodez and Paris (Orly)]
  NOR: DEVA1512217A
  http://www.legifrance.gouv.fr/initRechTexte.do
  For further information please contact:





  Direction Générale de l’Aviation Civile |
| DTA/SDT/T2 |
| 50 rue Henry Farman |
| 75 720 Paris cedex 15 |
| FRANCE |
| Tel. +33 158094321 |
| Email: osp-compagnies.dta@aviation-civile.gouv.fr |

Member State

France

Route concerned

Rodez (Aveyron) – Paris (Orly)

Original date of entry into force of the public service obligations

1 June 1997

Date of entry into force of the changes

The day after the publication of this notice

Address from which the text and any relevant information and/or documentation relating to the public service obligation can be obtained

Arrêté du 10 juin 2015 modifiant les obligations de service public imposées sur les services aériens entre Rodez et Paris (Orly) [Decree of 10 June 2015 amending the public service obligations imposed on air services between Rodez and Paris (Orly)]

NOR: DEVA1512217A

http://www.legifrance.gouv.fr/initRechTexte.do

For further information please contact:

Direction Générale de l’Aviation Civile

DTA/SDT/T2

50 rue Henry Farman

75 720 Paris cedex 15

FRANCE

Tel. +33 158094321

Email: osp-compagnies.dta@aviation-civile.gouv.fr

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-2000
<CASH>                                          64,924
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               36,985,321
<ALLOWANCES>                                 6,017,556
<INVENTORY>                                 19,729,964
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            54,783,071
<PP&E>                                      10,953,492
<DEPRECIATION>                               5,877,920
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              91,341,324
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       15,583,547
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        43,674
<OTHER-SE>                                  33,608,330
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                91,341,324
<SALES>                                    151,055,376
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           151,055,376
<CGS>                                      124,073,184
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              124,073,184
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            30,730,014
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           5,097,322
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (8,845,144)
<INCOME-TAX>                                    88,333
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (8,933,477)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (8,933,477)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (2.26)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (2.26)



</TABLE>
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 3720

To regulate the manufacture, importation, and sale of jacketed hollow point

ammunition, and for other purposes.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

NOVEMBER 23, 1993

Ms. PELOSI (for herself, Mr. SCHUMER, and Mr. STARK) introduced the

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

A BILL

To regulate the manufacture, importation, and sale of

jacketed hollow point ammunition, and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That section 921(a)(17)(B) of title 18, United States

4 Code, is amended by adding at the end the following:

5 ‘‘Such term includes any projectile that is manufactured

6 with a metal jacket, a lead core, and a hollow cavity in

7 the nose of the projectile, and that, after being fired from

8 a firearm, is designed to expand upon impact.’’.

Æ
#### Harry DEVLIN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 72-850.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

June 6, 1973.

James A. Gardner, Public Defender, and W. Daniel Kearney, Asst. Public Defender, Bradenton, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Frank B. Kessler, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellee.

*641PER CURIAM.

Affirmed on the authority of the recent decision of the supreme court in State v. Wilson, Fla.1973, 276 So.2d 45 and on the authority of the opinion of this court in Henry v. State, Fla.App.1973, 277 So.2d 78.

LILES, A. C. J„ and McNULTY and BOARDMAN, Tb, concur.