alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14 I, Alexandre Frigon, the President, CEO of Xumanii, Inc.. (the “Registrant”), certify that; (1)I have reviewed this quarterlyl Report on Form 10-Q of the Registrant;(2)Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;(3)Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;(4)I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) for the Registrant and have:a)Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under my supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the Registrant is made known to me by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;b)Evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report my conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; andc)Disclosed in this report any change in the Registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the Registrant's most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and(5)I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of the internal control over financial reporting, to the Registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of Registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):a)All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; andb)Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.  March 18, 2013/s/Alexandre FrigonBy:Alexandre FrigonPresident, CEOand Chief Financial Officer
#### Commonwealth *v.*Meyers, Appellant.

Argued October 2, 1941.

Before Keller. P. J., Cunningham, Baldrige, Stadteeld, Rhodes, Hirt and Kenworthey, JJ.

*353October 8, 1941:

*Henry L. Snyder,*with him *Linn H. Sehantz,*for appellant.

*Joseph E. Gehringer,*District Attorney, with him *Kenneth H. Koch*and *Ernest F. Ritter,*Assistant District Attorneys, for appellee.

Per Curiam,

The appellant was indicted and tried for abortion. She was found guilty on the first count for unlawfully using an instrument with intent to procure a miscarriage. She was sentenced to pay a fine of f250 and the costs of prosecution, and to be committed to the Pennsylvania Industrial Home for Women at Muncy, Lycoming County, for a period of not less than two and a half years nor more than five years. She appealed from the sentence to this court.

The Act creating the State Industrial Home for Women, located at Muncy, (Act of July 25, 1913, P. L. 1311, as amended by Acts of May 14, 1925, P. L. 697 and June 22, 1931, P. L. 859, 61 P. S. § 566) provides that women over the age of sixteen years convicted of an offense punishable by imprisonment for more than a year may be sentenced to confinement in the said State Industrial Home for Women: and that “every sentence imposed pursuant to this Act shall be merely a general one to the State Industrial Home for Women, and shall not fix or limit the duration thereof. The duration of such imprisonment, including the time spent on parole, shall not exceed three years, except *354when the maximum term specified by law for the crime for which the prisoner was sentenced shall exceed that period, in which event such maximum term, including the time spent on parole, shall be the limit of detention.”

The maximum term for the offense of which she was convicted is five years, (Act of June 24, 1939, P. L. 872, Sec. 718,) which is the extreme limit of appellant’s detention in said Home under the general sentence that should have been imposed under the Act.

The seventh assignment of error is sustained. The judgment is reversed and the record is remitted to the court below, with direction to impose upon the defendant a general sentence of confinement in the State Industrial Home for Women, which sentence shall not fix or limit the duration of her confinement in said Home.
# C_2014422EN.01000201.xml

| 25.11.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 422/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.11.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 422/2

---

Information communicated by Member States regarding closure of fisheries

2014/C 422/02

In accordance with Article 35(3) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1224/2009 of 20 November 2009 establishing a Community control system for ensuring compliance with the rules of the common fisheries policy (1), a decision has been taken to close the fishery as set down in the following table:

1

| Date and time of closure | 10.11.2014 |
| --- | --- |
| Duration | 10.11.2014 – 31.12.2014 |
| Member State | The Netherlands |
| Stock or Group of stocks | SRX/2AC4-C |
| Species | Skates and rays (Rajiformes) |
| Zone | Union waters of IIa and IV |
| Type(s) of fishing vessels | — |
| Reference number | 74/TQ43 |

Date and time of closure

10.11.2014

Duration

10.11.2014 – 31.12.2014

Member State

The Netherlands

Stock or Group of stocks

SRX/2AC4-C

Species

Skates and rays (Rajiformes)

Rajiformes

Zone

Union waters of IIa and IV

Type(s) of fishing vessels

—

Reference number

74/TQ43

---

(1)  OJ L 343, 22.12.2009, p. 1.

1

---
#### Fred CASH v. STATE.

No. 37219.

Supreme Court of Florida.

April 1968.

Appeal dismissed without opinion. 207 So.2d 18.
258 La. 973

#### VANGUARD HOMES, INC. v. NEW HOMES PROMOTION, INC.

No. 51474.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

June 16, 1971.

In re: New Homes Promotion, Inc. applying for certiorari or writ of review to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, Parish of Orleans. 247 So.2d 221.

Writ denied: The result is correct.
eldo_ex1036.htm


Exhibit 10.36


 




  





1











  






 


 




  





2











  






 


 




  





3











  






 


 




  





4











  






 


 




  





5











  






 


 


6
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS AS OF AND FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2000, AND IS QUALIFIED IN
ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                             473
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    7,892
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,775
<INVENTORY>                                        688
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 9,788
<PP&E>                                          22,503
<DEPRECIATION>                                   9,688
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  42,583
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           13,276
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            1,547
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           176
<OTHER-SE>                                      15,812
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    42,583
<SALES>                                            454
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                15,988
<CGS>                                              416
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   19,480
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,725
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (5,198)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (5,198)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (5,198)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.31)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.31)


</TABLE>
#### FLORIDA LADDER COMPANY, a Florida corporation, Appellant, v. Robert G. LYNN, Appellee.

No. 71-632.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Oct. 26, 1971.

Appeal dismissed.
# C_2018086EN.01016101.xml

| 6.3.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 86/161 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.3.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 86/161

---

P8_TA(2016)0256

EU-Colombia Agreement on the short-stay visa waiver ***

European Parliament legislative resolution of 8 June 2016 on the draft Council decision on the conclusion, on behalf of the European Union, of the Agreement between the European Union and the Republic of Colombia on the short-stay visa waiver (12095/2015 — C8-0390/2015 — 2015/0201(NLE))

(Consent)

(2018/C 086/32)

The European Parliament,

The European Parliament

| — | having regard to the draft Council decision (12095/2015), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the draft Council decision (12095/2015),

| — | having regard to the draft Agreement between the European Union and the Republic of Colombia on the short-stay visa waiver (12094/2015), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the draft Agreement between the European Union and the Republic of Colombia on the short-stay visa waiver (12094/2015),

| — | having regard to the request for consent submitted by the Council in accordance with Article 77(2), point (a) and Article 218(6), second subparagraph, point (a)(v), of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (C8-0390/2015), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the request for consent submitted by the Council in accordance with Article 77(2), point (a) and Article 218(6), second subparagraph, point (a)(v), of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (C8-0390/2015),

| — | having regard to Rule 99(1), first and third subparagraphs, Rule 99(2) and Rule 108(7) of its Rules of Procedure, |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to Rule 99(1), first and third subparagraphs, Rule 99(2) and Rule 108(7) of its Rules of Procedure,

| — | having regard to the recommendation of the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs (A8-0178/2016), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the recommendation of the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs (A8-0178/2016),

| 1. | Gives its consent to conclusion of the agreement; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Gives its consent to conclusion of the agreement;

| 2. | Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council, the Commission and the governments and parliaments of the Member States and of the Republic of Colombia. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council, the Commission and the governments and parliaments of the Member States and of the Republic of Colombia.

---
Page 1 of 3

Disposition Comments

Docket No: FAA-2011-1066 These comments are in

Directorate ID: 2011-NM-050-AD response to an SNPRM

Originating Office Tracking No.: 

Next Step: FRAN SNPRM

 No Comments/Only Supportive Comments Received – If this box is checked, no signatures are 

required.

No Has the referenced service information been revised since the NPRM was issued? If yes, 

list latest revision and attach a copy. Note that changes beyond the scope of the previously 

published NPRM will require a new notice. Contact the Directorate focal point for guidance.

Instructions: Summarize all comments by issue (not by commenter) and provide your recommended resolution of 

each issue. All comments relating to the same issue should be discussed together. Do not list all of the issues 

from one commenter together. If changes to the AD are required based on the comments received, explain why and 

describe in detail what change(s) you recommend. Reference FAA-IR-M-8040.1C Chapter 9.

ISSUE 1: Select one of the following: 

If other, explain: 

Commenter(s): 

What change to the AD action is requested? 

Why is the change requested or how is it justified? 

Do we agree? 

If YES, we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: 

If PARTIALLY AGREE, we agree with because We disagree with because 

Make the following changes to the AD: 

If NO, we don’t agree because 

ISSUE 2: Select one of the following: 

If other, explain: 

Commenter(s): 

What change to the AD action is requested? 

Why is the change requested or how is it justified? 

Do we agree? 

If YES, we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: 

If PARTIALLY AGREE, we agree with because We disagree with because 

Make the following changes to the AD:
Page 2 of 3

If NO, we don’t agree because 

For additional issues, double-click here
Page 3 of 3

Signature Section

Signature indicates concurrence with this action.

Originating Office Tracking No.: 

ASE Printed Name: Date

Branch Manager Date
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

E. BERTITA TRABERT GRAEBNER,

individually and as Trustee of the El Nora

L. Trabert Irrevocable Trust; et al.,

 Plaintiffs - Appellants,

 v.

WM. PAGE & ASSOCIATES, INC., a

foreign corporation and WILLIAM

SCOTT PAGE, an individual,

 Defendants - Appellees.

No. 13-16992

D.C. No. 3:12-cv-01694-WHA

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of California

William H. Alsup, District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted November 20, 2015

San Francisco, California

Before: MELLOY,** IKUTA, and HURWITZ, Circuit Judges. 

FILED

DEC 03 2015

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

 * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

 ** The Honorable Michael J. Melloy, Senior Circuit Judge for the U.S.

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit, sitting by designation.
Bertita Trabert Graebner, Tallie Trabert, and Vernon Trabert appeal the

district court’s entry of summary judgment in favor of defendants Wm. Page &

Associates, Inc. and William Scott Page (“the Page defendants”) on statute of

limitations grounds. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. 

Based on Tallie Trabert’s letter and email correspondence, there is no

genuine dispute of material fact that she was on inquiry notice in 2008 due to her

actual suspicion of fraud by the Page defendants. See Fox v. Ethicon EndoSurgery, Inc., 35 Cal. 4th 797, 807 (2005). Vernon Trabert and Bertita Graebner

were aware of facts that would place a reasonable person on inquiry, specifically

that Tallie Trabert suspected fraud and that their viatical investments had failed to

perform as promised, and therefore were also on inquiry notice. See Jolly v. Eli

Lilly & Co., 44 Cal. 3d 1103, 1110–11 (1988). Once the plaintiffs were on inquiry

notice, they were “charged with knowledge of facts that would have been

discovered” by a reasonable investigation, Lee v. Escrow Consultants, Inc., 210

Cal. App. 3d 915, 921 (1989), notwithstanding any reassurances made by the

Trabert family attorney, Michael James. 

Although the plaintiffs were on inquiry notice in 2008, there is a genuine

issue of material fact as to whether they conducted a reasonable investigation and

what such an investigation would have revealed. A rational jury could conclude

2
that a reasonable investigation would not have revealed that the Page defendants

knew or should have known of the problems in the viatical industry at the time

they induced the plaintiffs to make their investment. The only evidence in the

record on this point is an excerpt from a 1998 book on the viatical industry, which

in turn cited a handful of additional public sources. Viewed in the light most

favorable to the plaintiffs, this evidence is insufficient to establish that the

plaintiffs’ causes of action accrued more than three years before they filed this suit. 

See, e.g., Tucker v. Baxter Healthcare Corp., 158 F.3d 1046, 1050 (9th Cir. 1998);

Cal. Code Civ. P. § 338(d). 

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

3
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER ON MOTION

Cause number: 01-18-00290-CV

Style: Jeffrey A. Harberson v. Brianne Strickland

Date motion filed*: January 14, 2019

Type of motion: Third Motion to Extend Time to File Brief

Party filing motion: Pro se Appellant Jeffrey A. Harberson

Document to be filed: Appellant’s Brief

Is appeal accelerated? No.

If motion to extend time:

Original due date: July 30, 2018

Number of extensions granted: 2 Current Due Date: November 28, 2018

Date Requested: N/A

Ordered that motion is:

 Granted

If document is to be filed, document due: February 13, 2019.

 No further extensions of time will be granted.

 Denied

 Dismissed (e.g., want of jurisdiction, moot)

☒ Other: _No appellant’s brief has been filed in this case or in appellate cause No. 14-18-

00449-CV. Accordingly, the Court grants appellant’s third motion to extend time to file 

appellant’s brief, but no further extensions will be granted, and this Court will dismiss 

this appeal for want of prosecution if no brief is timely filed by February 13, 2019. See 

TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(b).__________________________________________________

Judge’s signature: ____/s/ Laura C. Higley_________

 x Acting individually Acting for the Court

Date: __January 24, 2019_________
#### Jessie Lee KEY et al., Petitioners, v. Lou Verta PERVIS, as Executrix of the Estate of Ralph Emory Pervis, Deceased, Respondents.

No. 44897.

Supreme Court of Florida.

March 27, 1974.

Certiorari denied. 287 So.2d 184.

ADKINS, C. J., and ERVIN, BOYD, McCAIN and DEKLE, JJ., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF BIG FLOWER PRESS HOLDINGS, INC. AND
SUBSIDIARIES.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000924146
<NAME> BIG FLOWER PRESS
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                           5,307
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  152,454
<ALLOWANCES>                                    12,342
<INVENTORY>                                     46,510
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               216,381
<PP&E>                                         501,815
<DEPRECIATION>                                 134,939
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,054,268
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          232,900
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            10
<OTHER-SE>                                     179,232
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,054,268
<SALES>                                      1,376,706
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,376,706
<CGS>                                        1,072,296
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,072,296
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               271,329
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 1,371
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              42,040
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (10,330)
<INCOME-TAX>                                    22,336
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (32,666)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                               (13,463)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (46,129)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 97-30614

Conference Calendar

 

TOBY IHLI,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

WAYNE MCELVEEN ET AL.,

Defendants,

RANDY BENEVAGE; RON JOHNSON,

Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Louisiana

USDC No. 96-CV-2367

- - - - - - - - - -

June 17, 1998

Before DAVIS, PARKER, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

Toby Ihli appeals summary judgment for defendants Randy

Benevage and Ron Johnson. He argues that judgment in their favor

on the 42 U.S.C. § 1985 claim was in error because they failed to

meet their initial summary-judgment burden by pointing out an

absence of a genuine issue on a material fact concerning that

claim and the district court improperly met the burden required
No. 97-30614

-2-

of the moving party. Even if Benevage and Johnson failed to meet

their summary-judgment burden, the district court’s judgment was

correct because Ihli’s allegation, raised for the first time on

appeal, of animus motivating the defendants’s action, to

discriminate against Ihli because he is a mental-health-care

patient, is insufficient to state a § 1985(3) claim. See Word of

Faith World Outreach Ctr. Church v. Sawyer, 90 F.3d 118, 124 (5th

Cir. 1996), cert. denied, 117 S. Ct. 1248 (1997).

We have independently reviewed the remaining arguments and

the appellate record. We conclude that the district court did

not err in granting summary judgment to Benevage and Johnson. 

See Little v. Liquid Air Corp., 37 F.3d 1069, 1075 (5th Cir.

1994) (en banc).

AFFIRMED.
#### Robert M. MERRITT and Ruth A. Merritt, Appellants, v. The KEYES CO., Appellee.

No. 70-1135.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Jan. 6, 1971.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed.
DANA DAVID JOHNSON

,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

,

Appellee

. IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D 16

- 0840

_____ ________________________/

Opinion filed July 6, 2016.

An appeal from an order of the Circuit Court for Washington County

. Christopher N. Patterson , Judge

.

Dana David Johnson, pro se

, Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Anne C. Conley, Ass istant Attorney

General, Tallahassee , for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

LEWIS, WETHERELL, and RAY, JJ., CONCUR.
Exhibit 23.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PETROLEUM ENGINEERS

Ralph E. Davis Associates, Inc. hereby
consents to the reference to our firm and to its having prepared a report of DOMINION RESOURCES BLACK WARRIOR TRUST (the Company), and an estimate of the proved gas reserves for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2012. We hereby
further consent to the use of the report dated February 21, 2013 appearing in the Companys Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012 and in all current and future registration statements of the Company that incorporate by
reference such Form 10-K.



RALPH E. DAVIS ASSOCIATES, INC.By:

/s/ Allen C. BarronName: Allen C. Barron Title: President


March 15, 2013

Consultants to the Oil and Natural Gas Industries Since the 1920s