alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
| 1.     | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                |
|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                                                                                                                                 |
| 2.     | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |

|            | Yellow7, Inc. |                    |
|-----------------|---------------|-------------------------|
|            | (Registrant)  |                    |
|            |          |                    |   |
| August 30, 2012 | By:           | /s/ Jon Burgess         |   |
|            |          | Jon Burgess             |   |
|            |          | Chief Financial Officer |   |
exhibit10-4.htm
















Exhibit 10.4



AMENDMENT


To


Consultant Agreement












A Consulting Agreement was made and entered into effect on March 16, 2011 between AGH Management Corp. (the “Company) and William Mui (“Consultant”). Both parties agreed to transfer this consulting agreement to L.F. George Holdings, Inc., a Delaware Corporation, on June 20, 2011. The terms and conditions under the consulting agreement between the Company and the Consultant shall remain the same between L.F. George Holdings, Inc. and the Consultant.






















IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company and the Consultant have duly executed this amendment.












Company:                                                              Consultant:


AGH Management Corp.                                   William Mui

















/s/ George Lam                                                      /s/ William Mui


Signature                                                              Signature


George Lam                                                          William Mui







____________________________              _________________________


Date                                                                       Date

















LF George Holdings, Inc.

















/s/ George Lam 


Signature


George Lam












____________________________


Date
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Elizabeth A. Weaver

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

November 23, 2009 

1116 

Order 

 

November 23, 2009 

139618 

ROBERT FORTUNATE, 

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

v SC: 139618 

 COA: 288548 

Wayne CC: 08-111489-CK 

FOSTER, MEADOWS & BALLARD, P.C., 

Defendant-Appellee. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the July 28, 2009 order 

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded 

that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.
**From:** cneufeld [ mailto:cneufeld@bmi.net]

**Sent:** Monday, March 10, 2014 11:22 AM **To:** Wood, Gil **Subject:** RE: Catalyst timeline for BlazeKing Apex? Gil: It's fine for the docket. Chris **From:** Wood, Gil [ mailto:Wood.Gil@epa.gov] **Sent:** Monday, March 10, 2014 5:38 AM **To:** cneufeld@bmi.net **Cc:** Cole, David **Subject:** RE: Catalyst timeline for BlazeKing Apex? Hi Chris, Thank you for your prompt res ponse. Is this okay for the docket? I don’t see any CBI... Gil **From:** cneufeld@bmi.net [ mailto:cneufeld@bmi.net] **Sent:** Friday, March 07, 2014 10:14 PM **To:** Wood, Gil **Subject:** Re: Catalyst timeline for BlazeKing Apex? see below On Mar 7, 2014, at 9:40 AM, "Wood, Gil" <Wood.Gil@epa.gov> wrote: Hi Chris, What is the typical catalyst replacment timeline for the BlazeKing Apex furnace? We ha ve been offering the 3 years 100%, plus 3 year prorated warranty. However, our supplier has approved the same 10 year, 100% voluntary warranty we are offering on our wood stoves and inserts. We have an exceptionally low warranty rate and expect consumers to see a 10 year life span out of their combustors. Replacement cost? As stated in Boston, Blaze King has asked our suppliers to sell direct to consumer. This has eliminated cost increases from multistep sales. The combustor is available on line for l ess than $265.00 Is the catalyst larger, or special material? It is the same dimensional combustor as we use in our King wood stove model. However, we supply the Dura Foil stainless steel combustor as it is proven to tolerate higher temperatures.

Does it have special cleaning recommendations/features? Blaze King recommends consumers use the low burn rate with a full fire box of wood. Combustor temps are elevated as residence time is increased and temperatures are high enough to breakdown any build up. If additional cleaning is required, we suggest the removal and then cleaning with a 50/50 mix of distilledwater and vinegar. The acid nature eats away at the organic build up and rejuvenates the

combustor. We also have designed all our units to be "to ol free" for inspection, maintenance and service. Thanks, You are most welcome. Chris
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON

STATE OF WASHINGTON,

Respondent,

v.

COUNT MARKANTHONY CORHAN,

AKA MARK ANTHONY CORHAN,

Appellant.

No. 70499-1-1

DIVISION ONE

UNPUBLISHED OPINION

FILED: June 30, 2014

Per Curiam. Count Corhan appeals from the judgment and sentence

entered after he pleaded guilty to three counts of harassment - domestic

violence. The State concedes, and we agree, that the trial court erroneously

imposed a 72-month term of probation. We reverse the sentence and remand for

further proceedings. See RCW 9.95.210(1 )(a); State v. Parent, 164 Wn. App.

210, 212, 267 P.3d 358 (2011).

In his statement of additional grounds for review, Corhan alleges that he

did not understand the terms of his plea bargain, that he was unable to read the

plea documents because his attorney denied his request for reading glasses, that

the deputy prosecutor and defense counsel changed the terms of the plea

bargain without his consent, and that he did not commit the charged crimes. But

because these contentions all rest on factual allegations and materials that are

not part of the record on appeal, we cannot consider them. See State v.

McFarland, 127 Wn.2d 322, 355, 899 P.2d 1251 (1995) (reviewing courts do not

consider matters outside the record in a direct appeal).
No. 70499-1-1/2

Accordingly, we affirm Corhan's conviction. We reverse the sentence and

remand for further proceedings.

Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded.

For The Court:

I^O^

'J'- O

jr- >,^)

c_ m _

22 O-'.T

03

O -^;-fl

IP- -n:

com y

O O'J' • * ....: —•;

CO

v£>
#### HANNA PAINT MANUFACTURING COMPANY, an Ohio corporation, Appellant, v. BAILEY-LEWIS-WILLIAMS OF FLORIDA, INC.; Research Engineering Corporation; and G. & B. North, Inc., Florida corporation, Guy B. Bailey and Lawrence W. Johnson, a/k/a L. W. Johnson, Appellees.

No. 68-775.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Third District.

March 25, 1969.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
#### In re ESTATE of Ann V. DALTON, Deceased. DANSPAUGH-DALTON FOUNDATION, INC. v. SIGLEY.

No. 37192.

Supreme Court of Florida.

April 1968.

Certiorari denied without opinion. 206 So.2d 264.
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549  FORM 10-Q/A  [x] QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the quarterly period ended July 31, 2014  [ ] TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the transition period from _________to ________  Commission File Number:000-54493  DTS8 COFFEE COMPANY, LTD. (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter) Nevada80-0385523(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)  Building B, #439, Jinyuan Ba Lu, Jiangqiao Town Jiading District, Shanghai, 201812, China (Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code) 011-86-18101819011 (Registrants telephone number, including area code)  (Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)  Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes [x]     No [ ] Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate website, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files) Yes [x]     No [ ] Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definitions of large accelerated filer, accelerated filer, and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. Large accelerated filer[ ]Accelerated filer[ ]Non-accelerated filer[ ]Smaller reporting company[x](Do not check if a smaller reporting company)  Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes [  ]     No [X ]   APPLICABLE ONLY TO CORPORATE ISSUERS Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuers classes of common stock as of the latest practicable date: There were 32,208,333 shares outstanding of common stock of the registrant at July 31, 2014.      This amendment No 1. To the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10Q for the period ended July 31, 2014, is being filed solely to add dates to the signature page and certification pages of the previously filed Report.      SIGNATURES  Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.   DTS8 COFFEE COMPANY, LTD.  By:/s/ Sean TanSean TanPresident, Chief Executive Officer
Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer
Secretary and Director
(Principal Executive Officer, Principal Financial Officer
and Principal Accounting Officer)Date:  September 18, 2014
I

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 3737

To provide supplemental security income benefits to needy children.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JANUARY 26, 1994

Mrs. MINK introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee

on Ways and Means

A BILL

To provide supplemental security income benefits to needy

children.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Children’s Security Act

5 of 1994’’.

6 SEC. 2. FINDINGS AND STATEMENT OF PURPOSE.

7 (a) FINDINGS.—The Congress finds that—

8 (1) 14,300,000, or 1 out of every 5, children in

9 the United States live in poverty;
2

•HR 3737 IH

1 (2) an unprecedented 12,000,000 children in

2 the United States go to sleep hungry every day, un3 sure about when they will have their next meal;

4 (3) 100,000 children in the United States go

5 day after day without a roof over their heads;

6 (4) 10,000,000 children in the United States

7 have no health insurance;

8 (5) significant cuts in Federal programs to help

9 the poor over the last decade, coupled with economic

10 setbacks for families with children and increasing

11 child care costs for low income working parents,

12 have pushed child poverty rates back up to 1965

13 levels;

14 (6) crucial income support programs such as

15 Aid to Families with Dependent Children and unem16 ployment insurance have been eroded over the last

17 decade beyond their already inadequate levels; and

18 (7) proposals to further reduce support for fam19 ilies in poverty are receiving serious consideration at

20 the State and Federal levels.

21 (b) STATEMENT OF PURPOSE.—The purpose of this

22 Act is to create a safety net for children in the United

23 States, which will provide children in poverty with income

24 support in order to assure that they have adequate shelter,

25 nutrition, clothing, education, and health care.
3

•HR 3737 IH

1 SEC. 3. SUPPLEMENTAL SECURITY INCOME BENEFITS FOR

2 NEEDY CHILDREN.

3 (a) ELIGIBILITY FOR BENEFITS.—Section 1611(a) of

4 the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1382(a)) is amended

5 in each of paragraphs (1) and (2) by inserting ‘‘, and each

6 minor,’’ after ‘‘Each aged, blind, or disabled individual’’.

7 (b) DEFINITION OF NEEDY CHILD.—Section 1614 of

8 such Act (42 U.S.C. 1382c) is amended by adding at the

9 end the following:

10 ‘‘MINOR

11 ‘‘(g) For purposes of this title, the term ‘minor’

12 means an unmarried individual who has not attained 18

13 years of age.’’.

14 (c) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—Section

15 1612(b)(4)(C) of such Act (42 U.S.C. 1382a(b)(4)(C)) is

16 amended by inserting ‘‘or is a minor,’’ after ‘‘age 65’’.

Æ
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3289 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3289

     To exempt from the antitrust laws certain joint activities of 
                   institutions of higher education.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 14, 1993

  Mr. Towns introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
     To exempt from the antitrust laws certain joint activities of 
                   institutions of higher education.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``College Financial Aid Protection Act 
of 1993''.

SEC. 2. EXEMPTION FROM THE ANTITRUST LAWS.

    It shall not be unlawful under the antitrust laws for two or more 
institutions of higher education to agree, or attempt to agree on--
            (1) all or part of the amount of financial assistance that 
        may be provided to an individual by any of such institutions, 
        or by the family of such individual, in connection with 
        enrolling in and attending any of such institutions,
            (2) a formula for determining such assistance,
            (3) any matter relating to requiring individuals who 
        receive financial assistance from any of such institutions to 
        engage in activities to obtain income to be expended to attend 
        any of such institutions,
            (4) student fees, or
            (5) communication among such institutions information 
        regarding--
                    (i) financial assistance provided, or to be 
                provided, to such individual, or
                    (ii) a plan, projection, or budget assumption 
                regarding future student fees.

SEC. 3. DEFINITION.

    For purposes of this Act--
            (1) the term ``antitrust laws'' has the meaning given it in 
        subsection (a) of the first section of the Clayton Act (15 
        U.S.C. 12(a)), except that such term includes section 5 of the 
        Federal Trade Commission Act to the extent that such section 
        applies to unfair methods of competition, and
            (2) the term ``institution of higher education'' has the 
        meaning given it in section 1201(a) of the Higher Education Act 
        of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 1141(a)).

                                 <all>
```
# C_2015136EN.01000601.xml

| 24.4.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 136/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.4.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 136/6

---

Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union

Cases where the Commission raises no objections

(Text with EEA relevance, except for products falling under Annex I of the Treaty)

(2015/C 136/02)

| Date of adoption of the decision | 22.01.2015 |
| --- | --- |
| Aid number | SA.38716 (2014/N) |
| Member State | Hungary |
| Region | — | — |
| Title (and/or name of the beneficiary) | Állatjóléti körülmények javítása — tenyészkoca |
| Legal basis | A tenyészkoca állatjóléti támogatások feltételeiről szóló VM rendelet-tervezet |
| Type of measure | Scheme | — |
| Objective | Animal welfare commitments |
| Form of aid | Direct grant |
| Budget | Overall budget: HUF 51  720 (in millions)
  Annual budget: HUF 8  620 (in millions) |
| Intensity | 100 % |
| Duration (period) | 01.02.2015 — 31.01.2021 |
| Economic sectors | Raising of swine/pigs |
| Name and address of the granting authority | Vidékfejlesztési Minisztérium |
| Kossuth Lajos tér 11. H-1055 Budapest |

Date of adoption of the decision

22.01.2015

Aid number

SA.38716 (2014/N)

Member State

Hungary

Region

—

—

Title (and/or name of the beneficiary)

Állatjóléti körülmények javítása — tenyészkoca

Legal basis

A tenyészkoca állatjóléti támogatások feltételeiről szóló VM rendelet-tervezet

Type of measure

Scheme

—

Objective

Animal welfare commitments

Form of aid

Direct grant

Budget

Overall budget: HUF 51  720 (in millions)

Annual budget: HUF 8  620 (in millions)

Intensity

100 %

Duration (period)

01.02.2015 — 31.01.2021

Economic sectors

Raising of swine/pigs

Name and address of the granting authority

Vidékfejlesztési Minisztérium

Kossuth Lajos tér 11. H-1055 Budapest

Other information

—

The authentic text(s) of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found at:

http://ec.europa.eu/competition/elojade/isef/index.cfm

---
Agreement

  
 

  
This Agreement is by and between Veronique Francois, whose address is 3301 Covalle Avenue, Austin, Texas 78702 (hereafter “Lender”); and Innovative Designs, Inc., a Delaware corporation with principal offices at 124 Cherry St., Pittsburgh, PA 15223, (hereinafter “Borrower”).

  
 

  
Lender and Borrower agree as follows:

  
 

  	
	
1.	
Lender agrees to lend Borrower the sum of $19,000 United States Dollars (“USD”).


  
 

  	
	
2.	
Borrower agrees to repay the principal sum of $19,000 USD on or before March 6, 2014.


  
 

  	
	
3.	
The term of this loan is 6 months.


  
 

  	
	
4.	
This loan shall bear interest of $1,900 USD. 


  
 

  	
	
5.	
Lender shall have the option of converting all or part of the principal sum of $20,900 USD into restricted shares of IVDN at a price of $.40 per share.


  
 

  	
	
6.	
This agreement shall constitute the sole understanding and Agreement of the parties as to its terms, and no modification hereof shall be given force or effect unless signed in advance by both Borrower and Lender.


  
 

  	
	
7.	
This Agreement may be executed in counterpart originals, which in the aggregate shall form one executed original of the Agreement, and a facsimile transmission shall be deemed to have the same legal force and effect of the original executed document.


  
 

  	
	
8.	
This Agreement shall be construed and enforced in accordance with the laws of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania.


  
 

  
WITH INTENT TO BE LEGALLY BOUND HEREBY, THE PARTIES AFFIX THEIR SIGNATURES HEREUNDER:

  
 

  	
  
For BORROWER:

	
  
 

	
  
 


	
  
 

	
  
 

	
  
 


	
  
Date: 8/30/13

	
  
 

	
  
/s/ Joseph Riccelli


	
  
 

	
  
 

	
  
Joseph Riccelli, CEO


	
  
 

	
  
 

	
  
Innovative Designs, Inc.


	
  
 

	
  
 

	
  
 


	
  
For LENDER:

	
  
 

	
  
 


	
  
 

	
  
 

	
  
 


	
  
Date: 9/18/13

	
  
 

	
  
/s/ Veronique Francois


	
  
 

	
  
 

	
  
Veronique Francois
#### Harry Lee MILLER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 43519.

Supreme Court of Florida.

April 13, 1973.

Appeal dismissed.
#### Jessie E. HILL, Appellant, v. CHRYSLER LEASING CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation, Appellee.

No. 68-751.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Third District.

March 25, 1969.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3778 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 3778

 To terminate funds for congressional parking attendants and to charge 
                              for parking.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 2, 1994

 Mr. Inglis of South Carolina introduced the following bill; which was 
           referred to the Committee on House Administration

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To terminate funds for congressional parking attendants and to charge 
                              for parking.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act shall be cited as the ``Congressional Parking Act''.

SEC. 2. TERMINATE FUNDS FOR PARKING ATTENDANTS.

    No funds shall be appropriated for congressional parking attendants 
or administering congressional parking attendants beginning in fiscal 
year 1995.

SEC. 3. MARKET RATES SHALL BE CHARGES FOR CONGRESSIONAL PARKING.

    Members of Congress, staff, and visitors shall be charged market 
rates for parking within the buildings and parking lots in the Capitol 
Hill complex.

                                 <all>
```