alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT 31.2**

**CERTIFICATION**

I, Robert A. Connors, certify that:

1.     I have reviewed this annualreport on Form 10-K of Fiberstars, Inc.;

2.     Based on my knowledge, thisreport does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit tostate a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading withrespect to the period covered by this report;

3.     Based on my knowledge, thefinancial statements, and other financial information included in this report,fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periodspresented in this report;

4.     The registrant’s othercertifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a)     Designed such disclosurecontrols and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures tobe designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relatingto the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to usby others within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisannual report is being prepared;

b)     Evaluated the effectivenessof the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in thisreport our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and

c)     Disclosed in this report anychange in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting thatoccurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’sfourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and

5.     The registrant’s othercertifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluationof internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors andthe audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performingthe equivalent functions):

a)     All significant deficienciesand material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control overfinancial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and

b)     Any fraud, whether or not material, thatinvolves management or other employees who have a significant role in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
| Date: March 31, 2006 | By:    |   | /s/ ROBERT A. CONNORS     |
|---------------------------|--------|--------|---------------------------|
|                      |   |   | Robert A. Connors         |
|                      |   |   | *Chief Financial Officer* |

 

----
#### Melvin MacDONALD and Evelyn MacDonald, his wife, Appellants, v. Henry C. CAUSEY and Audrey I. Causey, his wife, Appellees.

No. 72-579.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Oct. 26, 1972.

Appeal dismissed.
Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed February 25 , 2014

.

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14

- 13

- 00942

- CV

BIG MASONRY, L.L.C , Appellant

V.
EDWARD LIVING TRUST , Appellee

On Appeal from the 284th District Court Montgomery County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 09

- 08

- 07550

- CV

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

This appeal is from a judgment signed July 10, 2013 . No clerk’s record has been filed. The clerk responsible for preparing the record in this appeal informed the court appellant did not make arrangements to pay for the record.

On January 31 , 201 4 , notification was transmitted to all parties of the cour t’s intention to dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution unless, within fifteen days,2

appellant paid or made arrangements to pay for the record and provided this court with proof of payment. See Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(b).
Appellant has not provided this court with proof of payment for the record. Accordingly, the appeal is ordered dismissed.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Boyce, Christopher and Brown.
I

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 3764

To abolish the ex officio positions on the Federal Election Commission.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

FEBRUARY 2, 1994

Mr. LIVINGSTON (for himself, Ms. DUNN, and Mr. BAKER of Louisiana) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on House

Administration

A BILL

To abolish the ex officio positions on the Federal Election

Commission.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. ABOLITION OF EX OFFICIO POSITIONS ON THE

4 FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION.

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—The second sentence of section

6 306(a)(1) of the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971

7 (2 U.S.C. 437c(a)(1)) is amended by striking out ‘‘the

8 Secretary of the Senate and the Clerk of the House of

9 Representatives or their designees, ex officio and without

10 the right to vote, and’’.
2

•HR 3764 IH

1 (b) CLERICAL AMENDMENTS.—Paragraphs (3), (4),

2 and (5) of subsection (a) of section 306 of the Federal

3 Election Campaign Act of 1971 (2 U.S.C. 437c(a)(3), (4),

4 and (5)) are each amended by striking out ‘‘(other than

5 the Secretary of the Senate and the Clerk of the House

6 of Representatives)’’.

Æ
I

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 3733

To amend title 18, United States Code, to prohibit the interstate transportation of a firearm with the intent to commit a violent crime, and

to impose the death penalty for a violation that results in death.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JANUARY 25, 1994

Mr. LEVY (for himself, Mr. QUINN, Mr. KING, Mr. LAZIO, Mr. MACHTLEY,

Mr. BILIRAKIS, Mr. SOLOMON, Mr. MCCOLLUM, Mr. GILMAN, Ms. KAPTUR, and Mr. TORKILDSEN) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

A BILL

To amend title 18, United States Code, to prohibit the interstate transportation of a firearm with the intent to commit a violent crime, and to impose the death penalty

for a violation that results in death.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Violence With Fire5 arms Prevention Act of 1994’’.
2

•HR 3733 IH

1 SEC. 2. PROHIBITION AGAINST THE INTERSTATE TRANS2 PORTATION OF A FIREARM WITH THE INTENT

3 TO COMMIT A VIOLENT CRIME.

4 Section 922 of title 18, United States Code, is

5 amended by adding at the end the following:

6 ‘‘(v)(1)(A) Whoever transports or receives, or at7 tempts to transport or receive, in interstate or foreign

8 commerce any firearm with the knowledge or intent that

9 it will be used to kill, injure, or intimidate any individual

10 shall be imprisoned for not more than 20 years, fined

11 under this title, or both.

12 ‘‘(B) If the personal injury of another results from

13 a violation of this subsection, the person shall be impris14 oned for not more than 30 years, fined under this title,

15 or both.

16 ‘‘(2)(A) In the case of a 2nd conviction under this

17 subsection, the person shall be imprisoned for 20 years,

18 fined under this title, or both.

19 ‘‘(B) If the 2nd conviction under this subsection is

20 for a violation that results in the personal injury of an21 other, then the person shall be imprisoned for 30 years,

22 fined under this title, or both.

23 ‘‘(3) In the case of a 3rd or subsequent conviction

24 under this subsection, the person shall be imprisoned for

25 life, fined under this title, or both.
3

•HR 3733 IH

1 ‘‘(4) Notwithstanding paragraphs (1) through (3) of

2 this subsection, if the death of another results from a vio3 lation of this subsection, the person shall be imprisoned

4 for life, fined under this title, or both, and shall be subject

5 to the death penalty, and the procedure in respect of the

6 death penalty for aircraft piracy provided in section 903(c)

7 of the Federal Aviation Act of 1958 shall apply.

8 ‘‘(5) Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the

9 court shall not impose a probationary sentence upon, or

10 suspend the sentence of, any person convicted of a viola11 tion of this subsection, nor shall the term of imprisonment

12 imposed under this subsection run concurrently with any

13 other term of imprisonment including that imposed for

14 any offense in which the firearm was used.’’.

Æ
# C_2015384EN.01000701.xml

| 18.11.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 384/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.11.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 384/7

---

Notice of the impending expiry of certain anti-dumping measures

(2015/C 384/06)

1.   As provided for in Article 11(2) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009 of 30 November 2009 (1) on protection against dumped imports from countries not members of the European Community, the Commission gives notice that, unless a review is initiated in accordance with the following procedure, the anti-dumping measures mentioned below will expire on the date mentioned in the table below.

1

2.   Procedure

Procedure

Union producers may lodge a written request for a review. This request must contain sufficient evidence that the expiry of the measures would be likely to result in a continuation or recurrence of dumping and injury.

Should the Commission decide to review the measures concerned, importers, exporters, representatives of the exporting country and Union producers will then be provided with the opportunity to amplify, rebut or comment on the matters set out in the review request.

3.   Time limit

Time limit

Union producers may submit a written request for a review on the above basis, to reach the European Commission, Directorate-General for Trade (Unit H-1), CHAR 4/39, 1049 Brussels, Belgium (2) at any time from the date of the publication of the present notice but no later than three months before the date mentioned in the table below.

2

4.   This notice is published in accordance with Article 11(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009.

| Product | Country(ies) of origin or exportation | Measures | Reference | Date of expiry (3) |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Certain ring binder mechanisms | Thailand | Anti-dumping duty | Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 792/2011 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty and collecting definitively the provisional duty imposed on imports of certain ring binder mechanisms originating Thailand (OJ L 204, 9.8.2011, p. 11) | 10.8.2016 |

Product

Country(ies) of origin or exportation

Measures

Reference

Date of expiry (3)

3

Certain ring binder mechanisms

Thailand

Anti-dumping duty

Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 792/2011 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty and collecting definitively the provisional duty imposed on imports of certain ring binder mechanisms originating Thailand (OJ L 204, 9.8.2011, p. 11)

10.8.2016

---

(1)  OJ L 343, 22.12.2009, p. 51.

1

(2)  TRADE-Defence-complaints@ec.europa.eu

2

(3)  The measure expires at midnight of the day mentioned in this column.

3

---
Order entered August 27, 2013

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-13-00948-CV

RBC CAPITAL MARKETS, LLC, Appellant

V.

HIGHLAND CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, L.P., Appellee

On Appeal from the 95th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DC-11-02034-D

ORDER

We GRANT the August 23, 2013 motion of Deana Savage, Official Court Reporter for 

the 95th Judicial District Court of Dallas County, Texas, for an extension of time to file the 

reporter’s record. The reporter’s record shall be filed on or before September 26, 2013. The 

exhibits may be labeled with all the identifiers. If the exhibits can be converted, they shall be 

filed electronically. If the exhibits cannot be converted, Ms. Savage can file copies of the CDs.

/s/ DAVID LEWIS 

JUSTICE
EXHIBIT 32

                                  CERTIFICATION
                           Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350
                 (Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Berry Only Inc. (the
"Company") for the period ended March 31, 2012, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Lisa Guise, as Chief
Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


Date: May 21, 2012                     By: /s/ Lisa Guise
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           Lisa Guise, President,
                                           Chief Executive Officer and
                                           Chief Financial Officer Director

This certification accompanies each Report pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of ss.18
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
1 Freeman, Jeremiah (CONTR)

From: Richard Parker [richardparkerdc@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, December 14, 2011 8:06 AM
To: Alex Hofmann; Andrew Delaski; Aris Marant an; Art Rosenfeld; Bob Saint; Bob Smith; Edwards, Brenda; Brian Coffey; Caitlin Johns on; Carlos Gaytan; Caskey, John; Charlie Drexler; Charlie Stevens; Chris Bolduc; Chri s Brown; Clark Silcox; Creevy, Jim; Cohen, Daniel; Daniel Young; David Flaten; Marchetti , Emily (CONTR); Eric Peterson; Freeman, Jeremiah (CONTR); Gary Fernstrom; Greg C oulter; Greg Rosenquist; Hirsch, Bruce R; James Lass; Tiedeman, Jennifer; Jerry Corkr an; Jerry Hodge; Jerry Schoen; Raba, Jim; Joanna Mauer; Cymbalsky, John; John Rossetti ; Katie Coughlin; Ken Winder; Mahesh P. Sampat; Matthew Nardotti; Savitz, Maxine (E MAB); Meg Waltner; Meyers, Aaron; Michael Hyland; Michael Rivest; Millure, Dave; Pam Co stello; Phil Harter; Phil Hopkinson; Polinski, Raymond; Puesh Kumar; Richard W. Parker; Rick Anderson; Rob Greeson; Robert Berman; Van Buskirk, Robert (CONTR); Robin Roy; Ryan, Paul; Scott Beck; Simmons, Chuck; Steve Nadel; Steve Rosenstock; Ted Johnstone; Thom as Petrosino; Tim Ballo; Tom Eckman; Wes Patterson; Zhimei Luo Subject: Today's Conference Call on Medium-Voltage Transformers
Attachments: MVDT 2010 vs. 2011 LCC NIA PBP.v2.xls x; MVDT_LCC.NIA_2011 prices_112811.pdf; MVDT_ LCC.PBP.Results_2010 prices_111711.pdf

Dear Colleagues,

As you know, today's conference call is the last scheduled event of our negotiated rulemaking process on medium-voltage transformers. It is scheduled to r un from 11 am to 1 pm, though we will end sooner if we

finish our business sooner.

I propose that we use th e time to do two things:

1) See if we can get to yes on an EL to recommend fo r DL 12, thereby creating a clear foundation an agreement

on MVDT.

I propose to focus on DL 12 because DLs 9, 10, and 11 ar e very small in sales (about 5 % of the market combined). E.g., 135 DL 11 units shipped in in 2009, whereas 1936 DL 12 units were sold.

Also, these other DLs should scale off of DL 12, except for the low kVA portion (< 300 KvA) of DL 11 which is even smaller. DL 13 is a high-BIL versi on of DL 12 (and the upper end of DL11) and also can be treated as variant of DL12. Adjustment fact ors for DLs 9, 10, 11 and 13 have been proposed by NEMA, but I would suggest that these can be treated separately as part of a technical exercise, that we can discuss if we can get to yes on the big issue, which is DL 12

2) Discuss next steps, if any, for th is group on liquid-filled transformers.

Attached for your review is a chart containing the ke y LCC information for DL 12, with 2010 price results and 2011 price results displayed side-by-side for ease of reference. Also atta ched are the full LBL and Engineering Analysis results for both 2010 prices and 2011 prices. 2011 prices are what we re are focusing on, but 2010 prices offers a useful refe rence (sensitivity if you will).

I look forward to talking with you at 11. This will be a time for bottom lines. We know the arguments.

Best,

Richard Parker

Facilitator
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>     5
<LEGEND>
   THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION
   EXTRACTED FROM THE BALANCE SHEETS AND STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
   AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
   FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>  1
       
<S>                               <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                     YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                 OCT-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                    NOV-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                      OCT-31-1996
<CASH>                            $ 3,053,010 
<SECURITIES>                        5,509,893 
<RECEIVABLES>                       1,444,184 
<ALLOWANCES>                           12,500 
<INVENTORY>                                 0 
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                   10,412,386 
<PP&E>                             14,615,734 
<DEPRECIATION>                     (2,445,438)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                     25,436,332 
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>               1,846,622 
<BONDS>                                     0 
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>               3,382,965 
<PREFERRED>                                 0 
<COMMON>                                    0 
<OTHER-SE>                         15,613,751 
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>       25,436,332 
<SALES>                                     0 
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                   11,203,353 
<CGS>                                       0 
<TOTAL-COSTS>                       6,572,259 
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            0 
<LOSS-PROVISION>                            0 
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          0 
<INCOME-PRETAX>                     4,631,094 
<INCOME-TAX>                        1,559,000 
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                 3,072,094 
<DISCONTINUED>                              0 
<EXTRAORDINARY>                             0 
<CHANGES>                                   0 
<NET-INCOME>                        3,072,094 
<EPS-PRIMARY>                            4.54 
<EPS-DILUTED>                            4.54 
        

</TABLE>
# C_2015064EN.01000801.xml

| 21.2.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 64/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.2.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 64/8

---

Notice for the attention of persons, groups and entities included on the list provided for in Article 2(3) of Council Regulation (EC) No 2580/2001 on specific restrictive measures directed against certain persons and entities with a view to combating terrorism

(see Annex to Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 790/2014 of 22 July 2014)

(2015/C 64/04)

The following information is brought to the attention of persons, groups and entities listed in Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 790/2014 of 22 July 2014 (1).

1

Council Regulation (EC) No 2580/2001 of 27 December 2001 (2) provides for a freezing of all funds, other financial assets and economic resources belonging to the persons, groups and entities concerned and that no funds, other financial assets and economic resources may be made available to them, whether directly or indirectly.

2

The Council has been provided with new information relevant to the listing of the abovementioned persons, groups and entities. Having considered this new information, the Council has amended the statements of reasons accordingly.

The persons, groups and entities concerned may submit a request to obtain the updated Council’s statements of reasons for maintaining them on the abovementioned list to the following address:

| Council of the European Union |
| --- |
| (Attn: CP 931 designations) |
| Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175 |
| 1048 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |
| E-mail: sanctions@consilium.europa.eu |

Council of the European Union

(Attn: CP 931 designations)

Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175

1048 Bruxelles/Brussel

BELGIQUE/BELGIË

E-mail: sanctions@consilium.europa.eu

Such a request should be submitted by 26 February 2015.

The persons, groups and entities concerned may submit at any time a request to the Council, together with any supporting documentation, that the decision to include and maintain them on the list should be reconsidered, to the address provided above. Such requests will be considered when they are received. In this respect, the attention of the persons, groups and entities concerned is drawn to the regular review by the Council of the list according to Article 1(6) of Common Position 2001/931/CFSP (3). In order for requests to be considered at the next review, it should be submitted by 6 March 2015.

3

The attention of the persons, groups and entities concerned is drawn to the possibility of making an application to the competent authorities of the relevant Member State(s) as listed in the Annex to the Regulation in order to obtain an authorisation to use frozen funds for essential needs or specific payments in accordance with Article 5(2) of that Regulation. An updated list of competent authorities is available on the web at the following address:

http://ec.europa.eu/comm/external_relations/cfsp/sanctions/measures.htm

---

(1)  OJ L 217, 23.7.2014, p. 1.

1

(2)  OJ L 344, 28.12.2001, p. 70.

2

(3)  OJ L 344, 28.12.2001, p. 93.

3

---
**Final Listing of Questionnaire Files for Steam Electric Rulemaking Record**

**Plant ID 06816**  **Removed from Public**  **(Non-CBI) Docket**  **1 Copyright** 

**Flag 2**  **File Name Description**  x 

### 06816\06816_Checklist.xls EPA Technical Review Checklist Workbook



### 06816\06816_Completeness_Checklist.xls EPA Completeness Review Checklist 

### 06816\06816_HardcopyLog.doc EPA log of hardcopy documents submitted x 

### 06816\06816_PartA.xls Plant submitted survey file x 

### 06816\06816_PartB.xls Plant submitted survey file x 

### 06816\06816_PartC.xls Plant submitted survey file x 

### 06816\06816_PartD.xls Plant submitted survey file x 

### 06816\06816_PartH.xls Plant submitted survey file



### 06816\Certification Letter_06816.PDF Plant certification statement x 

### 06816\Extra Files Submitted by Plant\06816_PartA_locked.xls Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 

### 06816\Supporting Documentation\06816_WATER CYCLES - Drake PROCESS WATER SYS.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 

### 06816\Supporting Documentation\06816_WATER CYCLES - Drake WW TREATMENT POND SYS.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 

### 06816\Supporting Documentation\Drake 06816 site map.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

1Final reviewed survey responses are located in the Steam Electric Technical Questionnaire Database

. 2Copyright documents are available from the docket.