alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
f10q1213ex10iv_chinaginseng.htm


Exhibit 10.4


 


Labor Contract







This labor contract is based on the People’s Republic China’s labor law and labor contract law and other related laws and regulations.


 


Employer: Jilin Huamei Beverage Co. Ltd.







Employer’s address: RM1607  Zhongji Building 1562 Jiefang Great Road, Changchun City, Jilin, China







Legal Representative: Liu, Changzhen







Employee: Cai, Xiaohua







Gender: Male







Employee’s ID Number: 320626196505180034







Employee’s address: Chaoyang district Beijing city









I. Contract Period & Probation Period







Both parties agreed to choose   1    for the employment terms


 



	
1.  

	
Fixed contract period: From February 2, 2014  to February 1,2017.








	
2.  

	
No fixed contract period: From __________ year _______ month _______ day








	
3.  

	
By Project : From _______________ to completion







 


II Job Description & Job Location







CMO







III Working Hours & Time Off







Both parties agreed to choose   1    as working hours


 



	
1.  

	
Standard full time








	
2.  

	
Non Standard hours








	
3.  

	
Combined hours












IV Remuneration







By consensus, both parties confirm the wage is _¥10,000.00_ a month.  Payment should be in monetary form and full payment of the monthly wages shall be delivered by the _the last_ day of the month. Employer shall not unjustifiably deduct or delay in paying the wages. The monthly wage shall not less than the minimum wage implemented by the city.


 




  





  











  











V Social Insurance and Labor benefits


 


In accordance with central government, state, provincial and municipal policies and regulations







VI Labor conditions and labor protection against occupational hazards







In accordance with central government, state and provincial requirements relating to the implementation of occupational safety and health







VII Termination & Renew of the Labor Contract







Both parties observe the central government, state and provincial regulations regarding the termination of the labor contract.  Unless the violation is expressly stipulated by state, either party in violation of the contract will be subject to the payment of appropriate compensation for breach of contract.







This contract is effective from the date signed by both parties,









Employer: Jilin Huamei Beverage Co. Ltd.







Legal Representative: Liu, Changzhen       Date:   02-02-2014







Employee: Cai, Xiaohua                                Date:   02-02-2014







Governing Authority: Changchun City Employment Service (with seal)
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         Center for Scientific Review Special Emphasis Panel; PAR Panel Shared Instruments: NMR Spectrometers and X-ray Crystallography Equipment.                    

*Date:*                         September 20-21, 2018.                    

*Time:*                         8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.                     

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         National Institutes of Health, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Bethesda, MD 20892, (Virtual Meeting).                    

*Contact Person:*                         David R Jollie, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, Center for Scientific Review, National Institutes of Health, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Room 4150, MSC 7806, Bethesda, MD 20892, (301)-435-1722,                         *jollieda@csr.nih.gov.*

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.306, Comparative Medicine; 93.333, Clinical Research, 93.306, 93.333, 93.337, 93.393-93.396, 93.837-93.844, 93.846-93.878, 93.892, 93.893, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

      ( print page 42673)    
Dated: August 17, 2018.

Sylvia L. Neal,

Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2018-18182 Filed 8-22-18; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3598 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3598

 To amend the South Pacific Tuna Act of 1988 to provide for duty-free 
   treatment of canned tuna imported into the United States that was 
     caught by certain vessels and processed in certain facilities.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           November 20, 1993

  Ms. Schenk introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the South Pacific Tuna Act of 1988 to provide for duty-free 
   treatment of canned tuna imported into the United States that was 
     caught by certain vessels and processed in certain facilities.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled, That the South Pacific 
Tuna Act of 1988 (Public Law 100-330; 16 U.S.C. 973-973r) is amended by 
adding at the end the following new section:

``SEC. 22. IMPORTS OF TUNA.

    ``(a) Duty-Free Treatment.--The entry or withdrawal from warehouse 
for consumption into the customs territory of the United States of 
light meat tuna, prepared or preserved in airtight containers in any 
manner (except in oil), that is produced in any Pacific Island Party 
shall be eligible for duty-free treatment if it meets the requirements 
of subsection (b).
    ``(b) Eligibility.--Tuna shall be eligible for duty-free treatment 
under subsection (a) only if it--
            ``(1) is wholly produced in a processing facility--
                    ``(A) owned or operated under a joint venture 
                agreement between citizens of that Pacific Island Party 
                and citizens of the United States; or
                    ``(B) owned by citizens of the United States; and
            ``(2) was caught--
                    ``(A) by a vessel owned or operated under a joint 
                venture agreement between citizens of that Pacific 
                Island Party and citizens of the United States; or
                    ``(B) by a vessel documented under the laws of the 
                United States.
    ``(c) Regulations.--The Secretary of the Treasury is authorized to 
issue regulations to carry out this section.''.

                                 <all>
```
# C_2014354EN.01001301.xml

| 8.10.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 354/13 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.10.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 354/13

---

Communication from the Minister for Economic Affairs of the Kingdom of the Netherlands pursuant to Article 3(2) of Directive 94/22/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on the conditions for granting and using authorisations for the prospection, exploration and production of hydrocarbons

(2014/C 354/12)

The Minister for Economic Affairs hereby gives notice that an application has been received for authorisation to prospect for hydrocarbons in block D9 as indicated on the map appended as Annex 3 to the Mining Regulation (Mijnbouwregeling) (Government Gazette (Staatscourant) 2002, No 245).

Mijnbouwregeling

Staatscourant

With reference to the Directive mentioned in the introduction and Article 15 of the Mining Act (Mijnbouwwet) (Bulletin of Acts and Decrees (Staatsblad) 2002, No 542), the Minister for Economic Affairs hereby invites interested parties to submit a competing application for authorisation to prospect for hydrocarbons in block D9 of the Dutch continental shelf.

Mijnbouwwet

Staatsblad

The Minister for Economic Affairs is the competent authority for the granting of authorisations. The criteria, conditions and requirements referred to in Articles 5(1), 5(2) and 6(2) of the abovementioned Directive are set out in the Mining Act (Bulletin of Acts and Decrees 2002, No 542).

Applications may be submitted during the 13 weeks following the publication of this notice in the Official Journal of the European Union and should be sent to:

Official Journal of the European Union

| The Minister for Economic Affairs |
| --- |
| attn.: Mr P. Jongerius, Energy Market Directorate |
| Bezuidenhoutseweg 73 |
| Postbus 20401 |
| 2500 EK Den Haag |
| NEDERLAND |

The Minister for Economic Affairs

attn.: Mr P. Jongerius, Energy Market Directorate

Bezuidenhoutseweg 73

Postbus 20401

2500 EK Den Haag

NEDERLAND

Applications received after the expiry of this period will not be considered.

A decision on the applications will be taken not later than 12 months after this period has expired.

Further information can be obtained by calling Mr E. J. Hoppel on the following telephone number: +31 703797762.

---
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court 

Lansing, Michigan 

May 30, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

130412 & (22) Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices 

v SC: 130412 

 COA: 262847 

Kalkaska CC: 95-001476-FC 

LLOYD RAYMOND BRUEGGEMAN, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the December 6, 2005 

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has 

failed to meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D). The 

motion to remand is DENIED. The motion to hold application for leave to appeal in 

abeyance is DENIED as moot. 

s0522 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

May 30, 2006 

Clerk
EXHIBIT 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. {section} 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of China Golden Star Holdings Limited (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Jeremy Mork, Chief Executive and Financial  Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. {section} 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes- Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



|Dated:  November 19, 2010
By  /s/ Jeremy Mork
-----------------------------
    Jeremy Mork
    Chief Executive and  Financial Officer
   (Principal Executive and Financial Officer)
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
#### Richard G. TOWNES, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1598.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Fourth District.

Jan. 19, 1968.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
file:///J|/INITENG/P12%20cases/p120437.en1.txt[11/7/2012 2:43:57 PM] INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT PMN: 12-0437 Post-Focus Draft Revision 2 8/28/2012 ENGINEER: Austin \ JD PV (kg/yr): Revision Notes / Assessment Overview:

SUBMITTER:

MSDS: Yes Label: No Gen Eqpt: Hand protection: The suitability for a specific workplace should be discussed with the producers of the protective gloves. Please observe the instructions regarding permeability and breakthrough time which are provided by the supplier of the gloves. Also take into consideration the specific local conditions under which the product is used, such as the danger of cuts, abrasion, and the contact time. Gloves should be discarded and replaced if there is any indication of degradation or chemical breakthrough. // Eye protection: Eye wash bottle with pure water. Safety glasses. Wear face-shield and protective suit for abnormal processing problems. // Skin and body protection: Choose body protection according to the amount and concentration of the dangerous substance at the work place. Wear as appropriate:. Protective suit. Safety shoes. Respirator: Wear a supplied-air NIOSH approved respirator unless ventilation or other engineering controls are adequate to maintain minimal oxygen content of 19.5% by volume under normal atmospheric pressure. Wear a NIOSH approved respirator that provides protection when working with this material if exposure to harmful levels of airborne material may occur, such as:. Dust safety masks are recommended when the dust concentration is excessive. Use a positive pressure, air-supplying respirator if there is potential for uncontrolled release, exposure levels are not known, or other circumstances wherefile:///J|/INITENG/P12%20cases/p120437.en1.txt[11/7/2012 2:43:57 PM] air-purifying respirators may not provide adequate protection. Health Effects: Causes skin irritation. // Causes serious eye irritation. TLV/PEL: None established.

CRSS :

Consumer Use: No SAT (concerns) (07/17/2012):

Migration to groundwater: Slow PBT rating: P2B1T1 . Health: 1-2 Dermal, Inhalation, XB Testing Eco: 2 Water (All releases to water with a CC = 11ppb.), XB Testing OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURE RATING: 1A NOTES & KEY ASSUMPTIONS: Generated by the 06/07/2005 version of ChemSTEER.file:///J|/INITENG/P12%20cases/p120437.en1.txt[11/7/2012 2:43:57 PM] POLLUTION PREVENTION CONSIDERATIONS: P2 Claim:

INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT PMN: 12-0437file:///J|/INITENG/P12%20cases/p120437.en1.txt[11/7/2012 2:43:57 PM]file:///J|/INITENG/P12%20cases/p120437.en1.txt[11/7/2012 2:43:57 PM] INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT PMN: 12-0437file:///J|/INITENG/P12%20cases/p120437.en1.txt[11/7/2012 2:43:57 PM]file:///J|/INITENG/P12%20cases/p120437.en1.txt[11/7/2012 2:43:57 PM]
<PAGE>   1

                                                                   EXHIBIT 24(h)


                                POWER OF ATTORNEY

         KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS that the undersigned director of United
Dominion Industries Limited hereby constitutes and appoints Richard L. Magee and
William Dries and each of them singly, his true and lawful attorney-in-fact and
agent, with full power of substitution and resubstitution, for him and in his
name, place and stead, in any and all capacities, to sign the Annual Report on
Form 10-K of United Dominion Industries Limited for the year ended December 31,
1999, and any or all amendments and supplements thereto, and to file the same
with all exhibits thereto and other documents in connection therewith, with the
Securities and Exchange Commission, the New York Stock Exchange, the Toronto
Stock Exchange and any Canadian securities commissions, granting unto said
attorney-in-fact and agent full power and authority to do and perform each and
every act and thing requisite and necessary to be done in and about the
premises, as fully to all intents and purposes as he might or could do in
person, hereby ratifying and confirming all that said attorney-in-fact and agent
may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.

  /s/ R. C. King, Jr.
------------------------------------
      R. C. King, Jr. Director



    February 11, 2000
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03

- 21

- 00687

- CV

In re Karen E. McRae

R. C. C. and N. T. , Appellant s

v.

Texas Department of Family and Protective Services , Appellee

FROM THE 274TH DISTRICT COURT OF HAYS COUNTY NO. 1 9,1739 , THE HONORABLE DWIGHT E. PESCHEL , JUDGE PRESIDING

O R D E R T O S H O W C A U S E

PER CURIAM

This is a contempt proceeding ancillary to the appeal of N. T. The subject of this

proceeding is Karen E. McRae , appellan t’s attorney.

Appellant fil e d her notice of appeal on December 27, 2021 , and her brief was due

March 8, 2022 . On March 3, 2022

, we ordered counsel to file appellant’s brief no later than

March 16, 2022 . To date, appellant’s brie f has not been filed.

Therefore, it is hereby orde re d that Karen E. McRae shall appear in person before

this Court on Wednesday

, April 13, 2022 , at 1:30 p. m. , in the Third Court of Appeals courtroom,

located on the first floor of the Price Daniel, Sr. Building, 209 West 14th Street, in Austin, Travis

Coun ty , Texas , to show cause why she should not be held in contempt and have sanctions2 imposed for her failure to obey our March 3, 2022 order. This order to show cause will be

withdrawn and McRae will be relieved of her obligation to appear before this Court a s order ed

above if the Clerk of this Court receives appellant’s brief on or before April 11, 2022

.

It is ordered on April 5, 2022.

Before Justices Goodwin, Baker, and Triana
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In  connection  with the  Quarterly  Report of SOLO INTERNATIONAL, INC (the "Company")  on Form 10-Q for the period  ended  December 31,  2010 as filed with the Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof (the  "Report"),  the undersigned,  in the  capacities  and  on  the  dates  indicated  below,  hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:



1.   The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of  1934; and



2.   The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all material respects,  the financial  condition and   results of operations  of the Company.



Date: January 24, 2011





/s/ Yury Shcharbakou

__________________________

Yury Shcharbakou, President,

Chief Executive Officer and

Chief Financial Officer
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

SHAWN KEVIN BRES,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 231 WAL 2019

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 2nd day of January, 2020, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

GRANTED . The issue, as stated by petitioner, is:

Did the Superior Court err in ruling that the Honorable Donna Jo McDaniel correctly treated the Petitioner’s Amended Post

- Conviction Relief Act Petition and/or Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, which challenged the constitutionality of Subchapter I of the Pennsylvania Sex Offender

Re gistration and Notification Act (which was recently enacted into law on February 21, 2018), as an untimely petition filed pursuant to the Post

Conviction Relief Act?
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

OSCAR DOUGLAS HERNANDEZ

ROSAS,

Petitioner,

v.

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent. No. 19

- 72408

Agency No. A070

- 158

- 485

MEMORANDUM *

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted May 17 , 2022 * *

Before: CANBY , TASHIMA, and NGUYEN , Circuit Judges.

Oscar Douglas Hernandez

- Rosas , a native and citizen of El Salvador

,

petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying

his motion to reopen for terminat ion of proceedings

. Our jurisdiction is governed

by 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for abuse of discretion the BIA’s denial of a

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 

# FILED

MAY 27 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS2 19

- 72408

motion to reo pen , Najmabadi v. Holder , 597 F.3d 983, 986 (9th Cir. 2010) , and the

denial of a motion to terminate

, Dominguez v. Barr , 975 F.3d 725, 734 (9th Cir.

2020)

. We deny in part and dismiss in part the petition for review.

Hernandez

- Rosas’s contention that the agency lacked jurisdiction under

Pereira v. Sessions

, 138 S. Ct. 2105 (2018) , fails. See 8 U.S.C. § 1252(b) ( 1988 )

(deferring to regulations to establish requirements to provide notice of the

deportation proceedings); 8 C.F.R. § 242.1(b) (199 3 ) (not requiring the time or

place at which proceedings will be held to be included in the order to show cause);

see also Karingithi v. Whitaker , 913 F.3d 1158, 1160

- 62 (9th Cir. 2019) (rejecting

contention that lack of hearing information in notice to appear deprived

immigration court of jurisdiction).

We lack jurisdiction to review the BIA’s denial of sua sponte re opening

because Hernandez

- Rosa s does not otherwise raise a legal or constitutional error

that would invo ke our jurisdiction. See Bonilla v. Lynch , 840 F.3d 575, 588 (9th

Cir. 2016) (the court retains jurisdiction to review BIA decisions denying sua

sponte reopening for the limited purpose of reviewing the reasoning behind the

decision for legal or constitut ional error).

The temporary stay of removal remains in place until issuance of the

mandate.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED in part; DISMISSED in part

.