alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NUMBER 13-06-00623-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

______________________________________________________________

BFI WASTE SERVICES OF TEXAS, L.P.

AND WASTE MANAGEMENT OF TEXAS, INC., Appellants,

v.

CAMERON COUNTY AND RED RIVER SERVICE, Appellees.

_____________________________________________________________

On appeal from the 107th District Court of Cameron County, Texas.

______________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Yañez, Benavides, and Vela

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

Appellant, BFI Waste Services of Texas, L.P. (“BFI”), has filed an unopposed motion

to dismiss its appeal. According to this motion, BFI has reached a settlement with

appellees and, accordingly, asks that its appeal be dismissed. Waste Management of

Texas, Inc. (“Waste Management”) also has appealed from the judgment below. BFI

asserts that Waste Management’s appeal will not be affected by the requested dismissal
2

of BFI’s appeal, and Waste Management’s appeal should remain pending before the

Court. More than ten days have elapsed since BFI filed its motion to dismiss, and no

response has been filed by any other party to this appeal. 

Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 42.1 allows this Court to dismiss an appeal

unless disposition would prevent a party from seeking relief to which it would otherwise be

entitled. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(1). In addition, Rule 42.1 expressly allows for a

severance on appeal to dispose of a severable portion of the proceeding if a severance will

not prejudice the remaining parties. See id. 42.1(b).

The Court, having considered the documents on file and BFI’s motion to dismiss the

appeal, is of the opinion that the motion should be granted. See id. 42.1(a). Waste

Management’s appeal is ordered SEVERED and will be docketed in this Court under cause

number 13-08-119-CV, and will proceed in due course.

BFI’s motion to dismiss its appeal against appellees is hereby granted and its

appeal is DISMISSED. Costs are taxed against appellant. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(d)

("Absent agreement of the parties, the court will tax costs against the appellant.").

PER CURIAM

Memorandum Opinion delivered and 

filed this the 3rd day of April, 2008.
#### Joseph Fink, Plaintiff in Error *vs.*Mary Hanegan, Defendant in Error.

X. *Mechanic's lien*— Married, *woman*— Susland *made co-defendant,*when.— In suit to enforce a mechanics’ lien against the property of a married woman, the husband must he joined as defendant. (Latshaw vs. Mc’Nees, 80 Mo., 881.)

*Error to Cole Circuit Court.*

*George T.*White, for Plaintiff in Error.

The Circuit Court in sustaining the demurrer, disregarded the 8th section of chapter 161, page 151, of the General Statutes, which authorizes actions concerning the separate property of the wife to be prosecuted against her alone. And the session acts of 1868, p. 87, gives her the right to defend by attorney and to be sued alone when she is defendant only. (Olaflin vs. Yan "Waggoner, 32 Mo., 252 ; St. Louis, etc. vs. Bernoudy, *et al.,*43 Mo., 554-5.)

There is no question about her right to make a contract that will be the basis of a mechanics’ lien. (Collins vs. Megraw, *et*al., 47 Mo., 497, and authorities cited; Burgwald vs. Weippert, 49 Mo., 60.)

*Lay & Belch,*for Defendant in Error.

Defendant was at the time of the alleged contract, and at the time of the institution of the suit, a *feme covert.*She could *281not have been sued alone in the absence of a statutory power, bat our statute expressly provides that when a married woman is a party, her husband must be joined with her in all actions, except when, &c. (W. S., 1001, § 8.)

The statute in relation to liens makes no provision for the enforcement of this legal or statutory remedy against the property of a married woman.

The only proceeding to subject separate property of married women, is a proceeding in equity ; this legal remedy cannot by any analogy be applied and enforced.

Adams, Judge,

delivered the opinion of the court.

This was an action to enforce a mechanics lien. The defendant, who is the owner of the property, is a married woman, as appears from the petition, and her husband is not joined as a party defendant.

This point is raised by a demurrer to the petition, which was sustained, and is the only question presented for our consideration.

A married woman is not *sui juris*and could not be sued at common law without joining her husband. It was necessary to bring him before the court to protect her interests. Our practice act as amended in 1868 ("W. S., 1001,§ 8,) is only declaratory of the common law and requires that “when a married woman is a party her husband must be joined with her in all actions except those in which the husband is plaintiff only, and the wife is defendant only, or the wife plaintiff and the husband defendant.”

An action under the mechanics lien law is no exception to this rule. This point was expressly decided by this court. in Latshaw, *et*al., vs. McNees, 50 Mo., 381

Let the judgment be affirmed.
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.1 Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report of Income Opportunity Realty Investors,
Inc. (the Company), on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2004, as
filed with Securities Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I,
Ronald E. Kimbrough, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer,
Principal Financial and Accounting Officer and Acting Principal Executive
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  1.
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2.
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company. Date: May 14, 2004
    
    /s/ Ronald E. KimbroughRonald E. KimbroughExecutive Vice President
and Chief Financial Officer(Principal Financial and
Accounting Officer and
Acting Principal Executive Officer
#### 567 ISLAND CORPORATION, etc. and Bank of Commerce of Florida, etc., Petitioners, v. NORTH BAY VILLAGE, Florida, etc., et al., Respondents.

No. 40101.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Oct. 5, 1970.

Certiorari denied. 236 So.2d 467.

ERVIN, C. J., and ROBERTS, DREW, CARLTON and BOYD, TJ., concur.
EXHIBIT 31.2


CERTIFICATION BY CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(a) AND 15d-14(a) UNDER THE EXCHANGE ACT





I, Michael J. Wortley, certify that:





|   |                                                                                                                
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|1. | I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Sabine Pass Liquefaction, LLC; and




|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                           
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.

Date: November 9, 2015


/s/  Michael J. WortleyMichael J. WortleyChief Financial Officer ofSabine Pass Liquefaction, LLC
# C_2015367EN.01000804.xml

| 5.11.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 367/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.11.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 367/8

---

EUROPEAN UNION AGENCY FOR FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS

Publication of the final accounts for the financial year 2014

(2015/C 367/31)

The complete version of the final accounts may be found at the following address:

http://fra.europa.eu/en/about-fra/finance-and-budget/financial-documents

---
#### Donald HANKERSON, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 70-136.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Oct. 2, 1970.

Walter R. Talley, Public Defender, and D. Turner Matthews, Asst. Public Defender, Bradenton, for appellant.

Earl Faircloth, Atty. Gen., and Morton J. Hanlon, Asst. Atty. Gen., Lakeland, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed on authority of Kaminski v. State, Fla.1954, 72 So.2d 400; Champlin v. State, Fla.App.1960, 122 So.2d 412, and Ryan v. State, FlaApp.1970, 236 So.2d 15 (2d DCA).

HOBSON, C. J., and PIERCE and Mc-NULTY, JJ., concur.
[Cite as Wuchich v. Mansfield Correctional Inst., 2011-Ohio-1756.]

Court of Claims of Ohio

The Ohio Judicial Center 

65 South Front Street, Third Floor 

Columbus, OH 43215 

614.387.9800 or 1.800.824.8263 

www.cco.state.oh.us

DIANE S. WUCHICH 

 Plaintiff 

 v. 

MANSFIELD CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION 

 Defendant 

Case No. 2010-09426-AD 

Deputy Clerk Daniel R. Borchert 

MEMORANDUM DECISION

FINDINGS OF FACT 

{¶ 1} “1) Plaintiff, Diane S. Wuchich, filed this action against defendant, 

Mansfield Correctional Institution (ManCI), contending her 2009 Hummer H3T was 

damaged while parked in a parking lot on ManCI grounds. Specifically, plaintiff 

contended the driver’s side rear door on her vehicle was dented as a proximate cause 

of negligence on the part of a ManCI maintenance crew conducting lawn mowing and 

weed eating operations on July 1, 2010 around the parking lot area. In her complaint, 

plaintiff provided estimates for automotive repair costs to repair her damaged vehicle. 

The amounts of the provided estimates were $409.49 and $632.10. Plaintiff did not 

designate a specific amount request in her complaint. The filing fee was paid. 

{¶ 2} “2) Defendant filed an investigation report admitting liability for plaintiff’s 

property damage and acknowledging damages in the amount of $409.49. Plaintiff did 

not respond. 

CONCLUSIONS OF LAW 

{¶ 3} “1) Defendant was charged with a duty to exercise reasonable care for 
the protection of plaintiff’s property while performing any maintenance work. Hoelle v. 

Miami Univ., Ct. of Cl. No. 2005-06970-AD, 2005-Ohio-4643. In regards to the facts of 

this claim, negligence on the part of defendant has been shown. Rust v. Miami Univ., 

Ct. of Cl. No. 2005-01226-AD, 2005-Ohio-1248; Laux v. Cleveland State Univ., Ct. of Cl. 

No. 2007-01410-AD, 2007-Ohio-2409; Dunlap v. Ohio University, Ct. of Cl. No. 2009-

06010-AD, 2009-Ohio-7081. 

{¶ 4} “2) Consequently, defendant is liable to plaintiff for the damage claimed, 

$409.49, plus the $25.00 filing fee which may be reimbursed as compensable costs 

pursuant to R.C. 2335.19. See Bailey v. Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and 

Correction (1990), 62 Ohio Misc. 2d 19, 587 N.E. 2d 990. 

 

 

 

Court of Claims of Ohio

The Ohio Judicial Center 

65 South Front Street, Third Floor 

Columbus, OH 43215 

614.387.9800 or 1.800.824.8263 

www.cco.state.oh.us 

DIANE S. WUCHICH 

 Plaintiff 

 v. 

MANSFIELD CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION 

 Defendant 

Case No. 2010-09426-AD 

Deputy Clerk Daniel R. Borchert 

ENTRY OF ADMINISTRATIVE

DETERMINATION
 Having considered all the evidence in the claim file and, for the reasons set forth 

in the memorandum decision filed concurrently herewith, judgment is rendered in favor 

of plaintiff in the amount of $434.49, which includes the filing fee. Court costs are 

assessed against defendant. 

 

 DANIEL R. BORCHERT 

 Deputy Clerk 

Entry cc: 

Diane S. Wuchich Gregory C. Trout, Chief Counsel 

133 Mohican Trail Department of Rehabilitation 

Lexington, Ohio 44904 and Correction 

 770 West Broad Street 

 Columbus, Ohio 43222 

RDK/laa 

Filed 1/26/11 

Sent to S.C. reporter 4/8/11
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3776 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 3776

To reduce the Speaker of the House's spending on salaries and expenses.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 2, 1994

 Mr. Inglis of South Carolina introduced the following bill; which was 
           referred to the Committee on House Administration

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To reduce the Speaker of the House's spending on salaries and expenses.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act shall be cited as the ``House Speaker's Staff Reduction 
Act''.

SEC. 2. REDUCE SPEAKER OF THE HOUSE'S SPENDING.

    The Speaker of the House of Representatives appropriation for staff 
salaries and expenses shall be reduced by 20 percent. This reduction 
shall not be less than $280,000. A ceiling of $1,115,000 shall be 
placed on the Speaker's spending for staff salaries and expenses. This 
reduction shall begin in fiscal year 1995.

                                 <all>
```
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Bassline Productions, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Randi Lorenzo, Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

1.

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

| Date: August 22, 2011

 

/S/ Randi Lorenzo                      

Randi Lorenzo

Chief Executive Officer

(Principal Executive Officer) |  |   |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--|--------|
|                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        |  |   |
|                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        |  |   |
|                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        |  |   |
EXHIBIT 32.1





CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER


PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002







I, Peter Reichard, President and Director of Europa Acquisition VI, Inc., (the "Company"), hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:




(1) The Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended April 30, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




By:
/s/ Peter ReichardPeter ReichardPresident and Director


Date: June 14, 2011











This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and  shall not be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
  A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Mark FORD.

No. 59651.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Sept. 19, 1977.

Barry F. Yiosca, Orleans Indigent Defender Program, New Orleans, for defendant-appellant.

William J. Guste, Jr., Atty. Gen., Barbara Rutledge, Asst. Atty. Gen., Harry F. Con-nick, Dist. Atty., Brian G. Meissner, Asst. Dist. Atty., for plaintiff-appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
<PAGE>   1
 
                                                                      EXHIBIT 23
 
              CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS
 
     We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statement on Form S-8 (No. 33-60819) and the Registration Statement on Form S-8
(No. 333-20163) of Paxson Communications Corporation and its subsidiaries of our
report dated February 12, 1997, except as to Notes 2, 18 and 19, which are as of
March 26, 1997, appearing in this Form 10-K. We also consent to the
incorporation by reference of our report on the Financial Statement Schedule,
which appears in this Form 10-K.
 
/s/ PRICE WATERHOUSE LLP
--------------------------------------
PRICE WATERHOUSE LLP
 
Fort Lauderdale, Florida
March 31, 1997
<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT 31.2

                            SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION
                            OF ROBERT A. COMEY (CFO)

<PAGE>

                                  CERTIFICATION

         I, Robert A. Comey, certify that:

         1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of MACC Private
Equities Inc.;

         2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to sate a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

         3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and
for, the periods presented in this report;

         4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

                  a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused
         such disclosure controls or procedures to be designed under our
         supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
         registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to
         us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
         which this report is being prepared;

                  b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure
         controls and presented in this report our conclusions about the
         effectiveness of the controls and procedures, as of the end of the
         period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

                  c) Presented in this report our conclusions about the
         effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our
         evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

         5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's
board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

                  a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of
         internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely
         to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
         summarize and report financial information; and

                  b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves
         management or other employees who have a significant role in the
         registrant's internal controls.

Date: December 22, 2003

  /s/ Robert A. Comey
------------------------------------------------
Robert A. Comey
Executive Vice President and Treasurer
(principal financial officer)
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
No. 1D 18

- 2116

_____________________________
W ILLIE M. L IGHTFOOT , J R

. , Appellant,

v.

M ARK S. I NCH , Secretary, Department of Corrections
, Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Leon County

. Charles Dodson , Judge

. May 31, 2019

P ER C URIAM

.
A FFIRMED

. R AY , B ILBREY , and J AY , JJ., concur

.

_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________2 Willi e M. Lightfoot, Jr., pro se
, Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Kristen J . Lonergan, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee
, for Appellee.
Exhibit
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE


SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Brooklyn Cheesecake & Desserts
Company, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30,
2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the “Report”), I, Anthony J. Merante, President, Chief Executive Officer and
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:





(i)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section
      15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
  and





(ii)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.





Date:
October 26, 2010


/s/ Anthony J. MeranteAnthony
      J. MeranteChairman,
      President, Chief Executive Officer and Chief FinancialOfficer