alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1  SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION  In connection with the quarterly report of Rainbow Coral Corp. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2015 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Kimberly Palmer, President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. SS. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  1.The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2.The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.  Date: August 19, 2015BY: /s/ Kimberly PalmerKimberly PalmerPresident, Secretary, Treasurer, Principal Executive Officer,
Principal Financial and Accounting Officer and Sole Director.   A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 385

To ensure that agencies establish the appropriate procedures for assessing

whether or not regulation may result in the taking of private property,

so as to avoid such where possible.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JANUARY 5, 1993

Mr. SOLOMON introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on the Judiciary

A BILL

To ensure that agencies establish the appropriate procedures

for assessing whether or not regulation may result in

the taking of private property, so as to avoid such where

possible.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Private Property

5 Rights Act of 1993’’.

6 SEC. 2. DEFINITIONS.

7 As used in this Act:
2

HR 385 IH

1 (1) The term ‘‘agency’’ means all executive

2 branch agencies which engage in activity with the

3 potential for taking private property, including any

4 military department of the United States Govern5 ment, any United States Government corporation,

6 United States Government controlled corporation, or

7 other establishment in the Executive Branch of the

8 United States Government.

9 (2) The term ‘‘taking of private property’’

10 means an activity wherein private property is taken

11 such that compensation to the owner of that prop12 erty is required by the Fifth Amendment to the Con13 stitution of the United States.

14 SEC. 3. PROTECTION OF PRIVATE PROPERTY.

15 No regulation promulgated after the date of enact16 ment of this Act by any agency shall become effective until

17 the issuing agency is certified by the Attorney General to

18 be in compliance with Executive Order 12630 or similar

19 procedures to assess the potential for the taking of private

20 property in the course of Federal regulatory activity, with

21 the goal of minimizing such where possible.

22 SEC. 4. JUDICIAL REVIEW.

23 (a) Judicial review of actions taken pursuant to this

24 Act shall be limited to whether the Attorney General has

25 certified the issuing agency as in compliance with Execu-
3

HR 385 IH

1 tive Order 12630 or similar procedures, such review to be

2 permitted in the same forum and at the same time as the

3 issued regulations are otherwise subject to judicial review.

4 Only persons adversely affected or grieved by agency ac5 tion shall have standing to challenge that action as con6 trary to this Act. In no event shall such review include

7 any issue for which the United States Claims Court has

8 jurisdiction.

9 (b) Nothing in this section shall affect any otherwise

10 available judicial review of agency action.

Æ
# C_2015367EN.01000801.xml

| 5.11.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 367/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.11.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 367/8

---

EUROPEAN RAILWAY AGENCY

Publication of the final accounts for the financial year 2014

(2015/C 367/28)

The complete version of the final accounts may be found at the following address:

http://www.era.europa.eu/Document-Register/Pages/Decision-n°-115-of-the-Administrative-Board-of-the-European-Railway-Agency-adopting-an-Opinion-on-the-Annual-Account-2014.aspx

---
#### Claude Lonnie CONNER, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

No. 68-838.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Third District.

March 14, 1969.

PER CURIAM.

Certiorari denied.
# C_2013347EN.01000601.xml

| 28.11.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 347/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.11.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 347/6

---

Special Report No 10/2013 ‘Common Agricultural Policy: Is the specific support provided under Article 68 of Council Regulation (EC) No 73/2009 well designed and implemented?’

2013/C 347/06

The European Court of Auditors hereby informs you that Special Report No 10/2013 ‘Common Agricultural Policy: Is the specific support provided under Article 68 of Council Regulation (EC) No 73/2009 well designed and implemented?’ has just been published.

The report can be accessed for consultation or downloading on the European Court of Auditors' website: http://eca.europa.eu

A hard copy version of the report may be obtained free of charge on request to the Court of Auditors:

| European Court of Auditors |
| --- |
| Unit ‘Audit: Production of Reports’ |
| 12, rue Alcide de Gasperi |
| 1615 Luxembourg |
| LUXEMBOURG |
| Tel. +352 4398-1 |
| E-mail: eca-info@eca.europa.eu |

European Court of Auditors

Unit ‘Audit: Production of Reports’

12, rue Alcide de Gasperi

1615 Luxembourg

LUXEMBOURG

Tel. +352 4398-1

E-mail: eca-info@eca.europa.eu

or by filling in an electronic order form on EU-Bookshop.

---
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 15

- 41742 Summary Calendar

YSIDRO VALENCIA , Plaintiff

- Appellant

v.
BRYAN COLLIER ; CHARLES M. BELL, Warden; HUNTSVILLE CLASSIFICATION COMMITTEE; MAJOR BUTCHER; DIRECTOR REVIEW COMMITTEE; GERALD GULLEDGE, Lieutenant , Defendant s
- Appellee s

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 9:13

- CV

- 212

Before DAVIS, SOUTHWICK, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Ysidro Valencia, Texas prisoner # 743105, appeals the di strict court’s dismissal of his lawsuit filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 1983, the Americans with Disabilities Act, and the Rehabilitation Act . Valencia has failed to challenge the district court’s determination that his complaint was repetitious. Although pro se briefs are afforded liberal construction, Haines v. Kerner , 404 U.S. 519,

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED May 1, 2017 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 15-41742 Document: 00513973947 Page: 1 Date Filed: 05/01/2017No. 15

- 41742

2 520 (1972), even pro se litigant s must brief arguments in order to preserve
them. Yohey v. Collins , 985 F.2d 222, 224

- 25 (5th Cir. 1993). Failure to identify an error in the district court’s analysis is the same as if Valencia had not appealed the judgment. See Brinkmann v. Dallas Cou nty Deputy Sheriff
Abner , 813 F.2d 744, 748 (5th Cir. 1987). Valencia therefore is not entitled to relief. See id. at 748

. Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED. Case: 15-41742 Document: 00513973947 Page: 2 Date Filed: 05/01/2017
Exhibit 32.2

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Greentech Transportation Industries
Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending April 30, 2011 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Ian B. McAvoy, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this certification as of the
7th day of June, 2011.


/s/ Ian B. McAvoy
------------------------------
Chief Financial Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3691 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3691

To require that printing for the executive and legislative branches of 
the Government be procured through a competitive bid process conducted 
               by the Administrator of General Services.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           November 22, 1993

Mr. Santorum introduced the following bill; which was referred jointly 
  to the Committees on Government Operations and House Administration

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To require that printing for the executive and legislative branches of 
the Government be procured through a competitive bid process conducted 
               by the Administrator of General Services.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. COMPETITIVE PROCUREMENT OF PRINTING FOR THE EXECUTIVE AND 
              LEGISLATIVE BRANCHES OF THE GOVERNMENT.

    (a) In General.--Except as provided in subsection (b), printing for 
the executive branch of the Government and printing for the legislative 
branch of the Government shall be procured through a competitive bid 
process conducted by the Administrator of General Services.
    (b) Exception.--Any department, agency, or other entity of the 
executive branch or the legislative branch that produces classified 
information may print that information.

SEC. 2. DEFINITION.

    As used in this Act, the term ``classified information'' means 
information that, for reasons of national security, is specifically 
designated by the Government, pursuant to law, Executive order, or 
regulation, for protection against unauthorized disclosure.

                                 <all>
```
#### PEOPLE OF STATE OF NEW YORK, Appellant, v. Richard JOHNSON, Appellee.

No. 73-143.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

July 31, 1973.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
ATHN-2013.12.31-EX-10.28


EXHIBIT 10.28


ATHENAHEALTH, INC.
DIRECTOR COMPENSATION PLAN as amended
(Effective January 1, 2014)
The Director Compensation Plan (the “Plan”) of athenahealth, Inc. (the “Company”) applies to non-employee directors, who shall receive the following compensation for service on the Board of Directors:
Cash Compensation
	
				
	Meeting Fees*
	 
	Meeting Fee

	In Person - Board Meeting
	 
	$
	3,000

	In Person - Committee Meeting
	 
	$
	3,000

	By Phone - Board Meeting and Board Calls
	 
	$
	1,000

	By Phone - Committee Meeting
	 
	$
	1,000

	 
	 
	 
	 

	Retainers *
	 
	Annual Retainer

	Annual
	 
	$
	20,000 

	Lead Director
	 
	$
	10,000

	Audit Committee Chair
	 
	$
	20,000

	Compensation Committee Chair
	 
	$
	10,000

	Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee Chair
	 
	$
	10,000

	 
	 
	 
	 

	*Meeting Fees and Retainers are payable quarterly in arrears, and Retainers are pro-rated for any partial period.  Board Meeting Fees will only be paid once per scheduled meeting even if a meeting occurs over one or more days. Committee Meeting Fees will only be paid once per day even if more than one Committee Meeting is attended on such day.
	 
	 
	 






Equity Compensation
Annual Grant
Annual equity grants shall be equivalent in value to $225,000 per year.  The equity amount will be determined by dividing $225,000 by the average stock price of the Company during the last 20 trading sessions preceding and including February 1 to arrive at a restricted stock unit equivalent.  Restricted stock units and/or stock options (or any combination of stock options and restricted stock units, which are awarded at a 2:1 ratio to option shares) shall be granted the first business day of March and will vest fully on June 1 of the following year.  Grants for new directors will be pro-rated for partial year service and granted on the first business day of the month following the later of the initial date of service or the date on which such grant is approved.  The number of stock option shares and restricted stock units will be reviewed annually by the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and are subject to change.
In addition to the cash and equity compensation described above, the Company reimburses each member of the Board of Directors for reasonable travel and other expenses in connection with attending meetings of the Board of Directors or committees thereof.
This Plan is prospective from its effective date and will not affect any compensation paid or granted before that date.  This Plan may be amended from time to time by vote of the Board of Directors.  This Plan does not affect the obligations of the Company to indemnify directors as set forth in relevant sections of the Company’s certificate of incorporation, by-laws, or indemnification agreements. Questions or issues concerning the application and administration of this Plan will be addressed by the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee.
### Ames, Angelia (OST) From: 

### Sent: Sauer, Edward W. <Edward.Sauer@squiresanders.com> Tuesday, June 05, 2012 2:25 PM 

### To: 

### Cc: Finamore, Robert (OST); Kruger, Brett (OST) Donley, Charles F. 

### Subject: RE: Volaris exemption Application

Bob/Brett--We've finished polling the service list and have "no objections" from everyone on it. May Iask you to please move this one forward as soon as you can? Thanks, ED Edward W. Sauer Senior Counsel edward.sauer@squiresanders.com T +1 202 626 6641 

### 0 +1.202 626 6600 F + 1 202 626 6780 M + 1 301 928 7877 Squire Sanders (US) LLP 1200 19th Street, NW Suite 300 Washington, DC 20036 www.squiresanders.com -----Original Message----- From: Sauer, Edward W. Sent: Tuesday, June 

### OS, 2012 11:18AM To: 'Robert.Finamore@dot.gov'; 'brett.kruger@dot.gov' Cc: Donley, Charles F. Subject: Volaris exemption Application Bob/Brett--Asdiscussed with Brett, attached is an application we have filed and served this morning for exemption authorityoverthe routes Morelia/Zacatecas-LAX, Monterrey-LAX and Guadalajara-LAS. Volaris had previous exemption authority in these markets, and due to an oversight, renewal deadlines were missed. We are pollingthe service list, and will letyou knowthe results. In the meantime, please let us know ifthere are any questions. Thanks, ED Edward W. Sauer Senior Counsel 1edward.sauer@squiresanders.com T + 1 202 626 6641 

### 0 +1202 626 6600 F +1 202 626 6780 

### M +13019287877 Squire Sanders (US) LLP 1200 19th Street, NW Suite 300 Washington, DC 20036 www.squiresanders.com

37 Offices in 18 Countries This message is confidential and may be legally privileged orotherwise protected from disclosure. Ifyou are notthe intended recipient, please telephone oremail the sender and delete this message and any attachmentfrom your system; you must not copy or disclose the contents ofthis message orany attachmentto any other person. Squire Sanders (US) LLP is part ofthe international legal practice Squire Sanders which operates worldwide through a numberofseparate legal entities. Please visit www.squiresanders.com for more information. #US

2
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3467 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3467

  To establish a health care reform trust fund in the Treasury of the 
                             United States.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            November 8, 1993

   Mr. Richardson introduced the following bill; which was referred 
 jointly to the Committees on Energy and Commerce, Ways and Means, and 
                         Government Operations

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To establish a health care reform trust fund in the Treasury of the 
                             United States.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. HEALTH CARE REFORM TRUST FUND.

    (a) Establishment.--There is established the Health Care Reform 
Trust Fund (hereinafter referred to as the ``Fund'') for the purposes 
of guaranteeing that the net deficit reduction required by the Health 
Security Act is fully achieved.
    (b) Moneys in the Fund.--The Fund shall consist only of amounts 
equal to the net deficit reduction, calculated pursuant to the 
procedures set forth in subsection (c), that is estimated to result 
from the Health Security Act. Such amounts shall be transferred to the 
Fund as specified in subsection (c).
    (c) Transfer of Moneys.--Within 10 days of enactment of the Health 
Security Act--
            (1) the Director of the Office of Management and Budget 
        shall determine the sum of the net deficit reduction that 
        results from the enactment of the Health Security Act; and
            (2) there shall be transferred from the general fund to the 
        Fund an amount equal to the sum determined in paragraph (1).
    (d) Use of Moneys.--Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the 
amounts in the Fund shall be used exclusively for health care reform.
    (e) GRH Exclusion.--Amounts in the Fund, as determined by the 
Director of the Office of Management and Budget, that result from the 
net total of direct spending and receipts provisions calculated 
according to the provisions of section 252 of the Balanced Budget and 
Emergency Deficit Control Act of 1985 shall be excluded from, and shall 
not be counted for purposes of, the totals under section 252 and 
sections 254(d)(3) and 254(g)(3) of that Act.
    (f) President's Budget.--Section 1105(a) of title 31, United States 
Code, is amended by adding at the end thereof:
            ``(27) information about, and a separate statement of 
        amounts in, the Health Care Reform Trust Fund.''.

                                 <all>
```
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 165 (Friday, August 24, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Page 42868]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-18334]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

Foreign-Trade Zones Board

[B-52-2018]


Foreign-Trade Zone 78--Nashville, Tennessee; Application for 
Subzone; Calsonic Kansei North America; Shelbyville and Lewisburg, 
Tennessee

    An application has been submitted to the Foreign-Trade Zones (FTZ) 
Board by the Metropolitan Government of Nashville and Davidson County, 
grantee of FTZ 78, requesting subzone status for the facilities of 
Calsonic Kansei North America, located in Shelbyville and Lewisburg, 
Tennessee. The application was submitted pursuant to the provisions of 
the Foreign-Trade Zones Act, as amended (19 U.S.C. 81a-81u), and the 
regulations of the FTZ Board (15 CFR part 400). It was formally 
docketed on August 15, 2018.
    The proposed subzone would consist of the following sites: Site 1 
(34 acres) One Calsonic Way, Shelbyville; Site 2 (66.9 acres) Stanley 
Boulevard, Shelbyville; Site 3 (32.6 acres) 201 Garrett Parkway, 
Lewisburg; Site 4 (35 acres) 1701 Childress Road, Lewisburg; and, Site 
5 (15.82 acres) 633 Garrett Parkway, Lewisburg. No authorization for 
production activity has been requested at this time.
    In accordance with the FTZ Board's regulations, Kathleen Boyce of 
the FTZ Staff is designated examiner to review the application and make 
recommendations to the FTZ Board.
    Public comment is invited from interested parties. Submissions 
shall be addressed to the FTZ Board's Executive Secretary at the 
address below. The closing period for their receipt is October 3, 2018. 
Rebuttal comments in response to material submitted during the 
foregoing period may be submitted during the subsequent 15-day period 
to October 18, 2018.
    A copy of the application will be available for public inspection 
at the Office of the Executive Secretary, Foreign-Trade Zones Board, 
Room 21013, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, 
Washington, DC 20230-0002, and in the ``Reading Room'' section of the 
FTZ Board's website, which is accessible via www.trade.gov/ftz.
    For further information, contact Kathleen Boyce at 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#99d2f8edf1f5fcfcf7b7dbf6e0fafcd9edebf8fdfcb7fef6ef"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="2d664c594541484843036f42544e486d595f4c4948034a425b">[email protected]</span></a> or (202) 482-1346.

    Dated: August 20, 2018.
Andrew McGilvray,
Executive Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2018-18334 Filed 8-23-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 302 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 302

 To provide that the flag of the United States should be displayed at 
half-staff on all Government buildings on Peace Officers Memorial Day, 
                        and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 5, 1993

  Mr. Porter introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To provide that the flag of the United States should be displayed at 
half-staff on all Government buildings on Peace Officers Memorial Day, 
                        and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DISPLAY OF FLAGS AT HALF STAFF.

    (a) The first section of Public Law 87-726 (36 U.S.C. 167) is 
amended--
            (1) by striking ``(2)'' and inserting ``(3)'';
            (2) by inserting after clause (1) the following new clause: 
        ``(2) directing the officials of the Government to display at 
        half-staff the flag of the United States on all Government 
        buildings on such day, as provided by section 3(m) of the Act 
        of June 22, 1942 (Chapter 435; 56 Stat. 377; 36 U.S.C. 175),'';
            (3) by striking ``(3)'' and inserting ``(4)''; and
            (4) by inserting in paragraph (4) ``, including the display 
        at half-staff of the flag of the United States'' after 
        ``activities''.
    (b) Section 3(m) of the Act of June 22, 1942 (Chapter 435; 56 Stat. 
377; 36 U.S.C. 175) is amended by inserting ``The flag shall be flown 
at half-staff on Peace Officers Memorial Day.'' after ``a Member of 
Congress.''.

                                 <all>
```