alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Stephen J. Markman, Chief Justice

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano 

Richard H. Bernstein

Kurtis T. Wilder

Elizabeth T. Clement, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 September 12, 2018

s0905

Order 

Clerk

September 12, 2018

155673

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 155673

COA: 334918

Saginaw CC: 2010-033977-FC

STEVEN DEWAYAN OWENS, Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the March 6, 2017 order 

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has 

failed to meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D).

WILDER, J., did not participate because he was on the Court of Appeals panel.
| 1.   | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|----------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2.   | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the consolidated financial condition of the Company as of the dates presented and the consolidated result of operations of the Company for the periods presented. |
|----------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   By: |   /s/ Phillip Stromer                                            |
|-----------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|  Name:     |  Phillip Stromer                                                      |
|  Title:    |  Principal Executive Officer,Principal Financial Officer and Director |
|  Date:     |  February 14, 2011                                                    |
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATIONS OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT
OF 2002



I, Kenneth A. Antos, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A of Dixie Foods International,
Inc. for the quarterly period ended November 30, 2014, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of Dixie Foods International, Inc.



|February 1, 2015 | /s/ KENNETH A. ANTOS                  | 
|---------------- | ------------------------------------- | 
|                 | Kenneth A. Antos,                     | 
|                 | President and Chief Executive Officer | 
|                 | (Principal Executive Officer)         | 



I, Richard S. Groberg, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A of Dixie Foods
International, Inc. for the quarterly period ended November 30, 2014, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Dixie Foods International, Inc.



|February 1, 2015 | /s/ RICHARD S. GROBERG                                                           | 
|---------------- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | 
|                 | Richard S. Groberg,                                                              | 
|                 | Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
        (Principal Financial Officer) | 



The foregoing certifications are not deemed filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission for purposes of section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (Exchange Act),
and are not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of Dixie Foods International, Inc. under the Securities Act of 1933,
as amended, or the Exchange Act, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language
in such filing.
#### AFFILIATED FOODS, INC., et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. Ramona Lavergne BLANCHARD, for and on Behalf of her minor child, Chad Joseph Blanchard, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 3777.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Third Circuit.

Dec. 30, 1971.

Davidson, Meaux, Onebane & Donohoe, by J. J. Davidson, III, Lafayette, for defendant-appellant.

Ronald E. Dauterive and J. Minos Simon, Lafayette, for plaintiffs-appellees.

Before HOOD, CULPEPPER and MILLER, JJ.

HOOD, Judge.

Affiliated Foods, Inc., and Fireman’s Insurance Company of Newark, New Jersey, filed a motion to remand this suit to enable them to traverse the affidavits of poverty filed by defendant-appellant. The matter is before us now solely on that motion to remand.

Judgment was rendered by the trial court in November, 1971. Shortly after that judgment was rendered defendant, Ramona Lavergne Blanchard, on behalf of her minor child, Chad Joseph Blanchard, filed a motion to proceed in forma pauper-is, and she attached affidavits of poverty to that motion. Pursuant to her demands, an order was signed by the trial court on November 18, authorizing that defendant to proceed without the prepayment of costs and without the giving of security therefor. At or about the time that order was signed, the defendant applied for and was granted “a suspensive and/or in the alternative devolutive appeal,” and the order of appeal decrees that “said appellant is dispensed with the necessity of furnishing a bond.”

Plaintiffs-appellees then filed in this court the motion to remand which is before us now, alleging that they are entitled to have the case remanded to enable them to traverse the appellant’s right to proceed in forma pauperis.

The established rule is that once an appeal is granted in forma pauperis the proper remedy to traverse the affidavits of poverty is to make timely application to the appellate court to remand the case for that purpose. Lake Charles Tile and Carpet Company v. Foster, 251 So.2d 196 (La. App. 3 Cir. 1971); Cahee v. Associated Indemnity Corporation, 247 So.2d 279 (La. App. 3 Cir. 1971); and Babineaux v. Southeastern Drilling Corporation, 166 So. 2d 742 (La.App. 3 Cir. 1964).

The application to remand was timely filed here, and the appellees thus are entitled to the relief which they seek.

*364For the reasons herein set out, the case is remanded to the district court for the purpose of allowing plaintiffs-appellees to traverse the affidavits of poverty, on the basis of which appellant was permitted to proceed in forma pauperis.

Remanded.
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3724 Placed on Calendar Senate (PCS)]

                                                       Calendar No. 439

103d CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 3724

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

   To designate the United States courthouse located in Bridgeport, 
        Connecticut, as the ``Brien McMahon Federal Building''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                 May 25 (legislative day, May 16), 1994

            Received; read twice and placed on the calendar

                                                       Calendar No. 439

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 3724

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                 May 25 (legislative day, May 16), 1994

            Received; read twice and placed on the calendar

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
   To designate the United States courthouse located in Bridgeport, 
        Connecticut, as the ``Brien McMahon Federal Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The United States courthouse located at 915 Lafayette Boulevard in 
Bridgeport, Connecticut, shall be known and designated as the ``Brien 
McMahon Federal Building''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the courthouse referred to in section 1 
shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Brien McMahon Federal 
Building''.

            Passed the House of Representatives May 23, 1994.

            Attest:

                                           DONNALD K. ANDERSON,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
IIA

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 3516

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

MARCH 23 (legislative day, FEBRUARY 22), 1994

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural

Resources

AN ACT

To increase the amount authorized to be appropriated for

assistance for highway relocation regarding the Chickamauga and Chattanooga National Military Park in Georgia.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. INCREASE IN AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIA4 TIONS.

5 Section 1(c) of the Act entitled ‘‘An Act to authorize

6 and direct the National Park Service to assist the State

7 of Georgia in relocating a highway affecting the Chicka8 mauga and Chattanooga National Military Park in Geor9 gia’’, approved December 24, 1987 (101 Stat. 1442), is
2

•HR 3516 RFS

1 amended by striking ‘‘$30,000,000’’ and inserting

2 ‘‘$45,000,000’’.

Passed the House of Representatives March 21,

1994.

Attest: DONNALD K. ANDERSON,

Clerk.
POWER OF ATTORNEY



     We, the undersigned officers and directors of Crompton & Knowles
Corporation, hereby severally constitute and appoint Vincent A. Calarco,
Charles J. Marsden, and John T. Ferguson II, and each of them severally, our
true and lawful attorneys or attorney, with full power to them and each of
them to execute for us, and in our names in the capacities indicated below,
and to file with the Securities and Exchange Commission the Annual Report on
Form 10-K of Crompton & Knowles Corporation for the fiscal year ended December
30, 1995, and any and all amendments thereto.

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, we have signed this Power of Attorney in the
capacities indicated on January 23, 1996.

Signature               Title                Signature          Title

Principal Executive
Officer:
                        Chairman of the
                        Board, President,     /s/Robert A. Fox    Director
/s/Vincent A. Calarco   CEO and Director         Robert A. Fox
   Vincent A. Calarco         


Principal Financial                           /s/Roger L. Headrick  Director   
   Officer:                                     Roger L. Headrick  

                        Vice President
/s/Charles J. Marsden   Finance and Director /s/Leo I. Higdon, Jr.  Director
   Charles J. Marsden                           Leo I. Higdon, Jr.         
                   
Principal Accounting              
Officer:                                      /s/Michael W. Huber    Director  
                                                Michael W. Huber 
/s/Peter Barna         Treasurer                        
   Peter Barna                               /s/C.A. Piccolo         Director  
                                               C.A. Piccolo   

/s/ James A. Bitonti   Director             /s/Patricia K Woolf     Director  
    James A. Bitonti                           Patricia K. Woolf
<PAGE>

                                                                Exhibit 10.34.1

                                                                 Execution Copy

                                  CONFIDENTIAL
             AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO INTERACTIVE SERVICES AGREEMENT

    This Amendment No. 1 to Interactive Services Agreement (this
"Amendment"), effective as of September 27, 2000, is made and entered into by
and between America Online, Inc. ("AOL"), a Delaware corporation, with its
principal offices at 22000 AOL Way, Dulles, Virginia 20166, and Medscape,
Inc. ("Interactive Content Provider" or "ICP"), a Delaware corporation, with
its principal offices at 224 West 30th Street, New York, New York 10001. AOL
and ICP may be referred to individually as a "Party" and collectively as the
"Parties."

                                 INTRODUCTION

    WHEREAS, AOL and ICP are parties to a Interactive Services Agreement
dated as of September 3, 1999 (the "Original Agreement"); and

    WHEREAS, the Parties desire to modify certain terms of the Original
Agreement, as provided below.

    NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the terms and conditions set forth in
this Agreement and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and
sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, AOL and ICP hereby agree to
amend the Original Agreement in accordance with the following terms and
conditions:

                                    TERMS

1.  CARRIAGE AND PROMOTIONAL FEE. Section 3.4 of the Original Agreement is
hereby amended by striking the following language, "$10,000,000 is due on the
twelfth (12th) month anniversary of the Effective Date, and $10,000,000 is
due on the 24 month anniversary of the Effective Date" and replacing it with
the following language, "$5,000,000 is due on October 2, 2000, $3,083,340 is
due on January 2, 2001, $2,750,001 is due on May 1, 2000, $2,750,001 is due
on August 1, 2001, $2,750,001 is due on November 1, 2001, $2,750,001 is due
on February 1, 2002, and $916,656 is due on May 2, 2002."

3.  DEFINITIONS. Capitalized terms used but not defined herein shall have the
meanings given thereto in the Original Agreement.

4.  ORIGINAL AGREEMENT. Except as specifically amended hereby, the Original
Agreement remains in full force and effect.

5.  COUNTERPARTS. This Amendment may be executed in counterparts, each of
which will be deemed an original and all of which together will constitute
one and the same document.

    IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the authorized representatives of the parties hereto
have executed this Amendment as of the date first above written.


AMERICA ONLINE, INC.                       MEDSCAPE, INC.

By:                                        By:
   ------------------                         ---------------------

Print Name:                                Print Name:
           ----------                                 -------------

Title:                                     Title:
      ---------------                            ------------------
```

[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 163 (Wednesday, August 22, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Page 42496]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-18101]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Project No. 10552-016]

Contractor's Power Group, Inc.; American Falls Reservoir District 
No. 2; Notice of Application for Transfer of License and Soliciting 
Comments, Motions To Intervene, and Protests

    On July 13, 2018, Contractor's Power Group, Inc. (transferor) and 
American Falls Reservoir District No. 2 (transferee) filed an 
application for the transfer of license of the Mile 28 Hydroelectric 
Project No. 10552. The project is located on the Bureau of 
Reclamation's Milner-Gooding Canal, in Jerome County, Idaho.
    The applicants seek Commission approval to transfer the license for 
the Mile 28 Hydroelectric Project from the transferor to the 
transferee.
    Applicants Contact: For transferor: Mr. Breck Glassinger, 
Contractor's Power Group, Inc., 124 Bridon Way, Jerome, ID 83338, 
Phone: 208-324-5563.
    For transferee: Mr. Ellis Gooch, President, American Falls 
Reservoir District No. 2, 409 North Apple Street, Shoshone, ID 83352, 
Phone: 208-886-2331 and Mr. Ted S. Sorenson, 1032 Grandview Drive, 
Ivins, UT 84738.
    FERC Contact: Patricia W. Gillis, (202) 502-8735, 
[email protected].
    Deadline for filing comments, motions to intervene, and protests: 
30 days from the date that the Commission issues this notice. The 
Commission strongly encourages electronic filing. Please file comments, 
motions to intervene, and protests using the Commission's eFiling 
system at http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/efiling.asp. Commenters can 
submit brief comments up to 6,000 characters, without prior 
registration, using the eComment system at http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/ecomment.asp. You must include your name and contact information 
at the end of your comments. For assistance, please contact FERC Online 
Support at [email protected], (866) 208-3676 (toll free), or 
(202) 502-8659 (TTY). In lieu of electronic filing, please send a paper 
copy to: Secretary, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First 
Street NE, Washington, DC 20426. The first page of any filing should 
include docket number P-10552-016.

    Dated: August 16, 2018.
Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2018-18101 Filed 8-21-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
```
Exhibit 31.1





CERTIFICATIONS


SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION FOR THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER


I, Richard S. Kahlbaugh , certify that:


1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Fortegra Financial Corporation (Registrant);


2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;


3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;


4. The Registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and have:


(a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the Registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;


(b) evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and


(c) disclosed in this report any change in the Registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the Registrant's most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Registrant's internal control over financial reporting.


5. The Registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the Registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):


(a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and


(b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Registrant's internal control over financial reporting.


Date: May 16, 2011/s/ Richard S. KahlbaughRichard S. KahlbaughChairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
I

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 3757

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide that a taxpayer

may elect to include in income crop insurance proceeds and disaster

payments in the year of the disaster or in the following year.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

FEBRUARY 1, 1994

Mr. MINGE (for himself, Mr. JOHNSON of South Dakota, Mr. GRANDY, Mr.

ROBERTS, Mr. HOAGLAND, Mr. PETERSON of Minnesota, Mr. OBEY, Mr.

COSTELLO, Mr. SKELTON, Mr. EMERSON, Ms. DANNER, Mr. LEACH, Mr.

GLICKMAN, Mr. BEREUTER, Mr. BARRETT of Nebraska, Mr. POMEROY,

Mr. SLATTERY, Mr. MANZULLO, Mr. EWING, Mr. EVANS, Mr. LIGHTFOOT, Ms. LONG, Mr. DE LA GARZA, and Mr. NUSSLE) introduced the

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

A BILL

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide

that a taxpayer may elect to include in income crop

insurance proceeds and disaster payments in the year

of the disaster or in the following year.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SPECIAL RULE FOR CROP INSURANCE PRO4 CEEDS AND DISASTER PAYMENTS.

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 451(d) of the Internal

6 Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to special rule for crop
2

•HR 3757 IH

1 insurance proceeds and disaster payments) is amended to

2 read as follows:

3 ‘‘(d) SPECIAL RULE FOR CROP INSURANCE PRO4 CEEDS AND DISASTER PAYMENTS.—

5 ‘‘(1) GENERAL RULE.—In the case of any pay6 ment described in paragraph (2), a taxpayer report7 ing on the cash receipts and disbursements method

8 of accounting—

9 ‘‘(A) may elect to treat any such payment

10 received in the taxable year of destruction or

11 damage of crops as having been received in the

12 following taxable year if the taxpayer estab13 lishes that, under the taxpayer’s practice, in14 come from such crops involved would have been

15 reported in the following taxable year, or

16 ‘‘(B) may elect to treat any such payment

17 received in the taxable year following the tax18 able year of destruction or damage of crops as

19 having been received in the taxable year of de20 struction or damage if the taxpayer establishes

21 that, under the taxpayer’s practice, income

22 from such crops involved would have been re23 ported in the taxable year of destruction or

24 damage.
3

•HR 3757 IH

1 ‘‘(2) PAYMENTS DESCRIBED.—For purposes of

2 this subsection, a payment is described in this para3 graph if such payment—

4 ‘‘(A) is insurance proceeds received on ac5 count of destruction or damage to crops, or

6 ‘‘(B) is disaster assistance received under

7 any Federal law as a result of—

8 ‘‘(i) destruction or damage to crops

9 caused by drought, flood, or other natural

10 disaster, or

11 ‘‘(ii) inability to plant crops because

12 of such a disaster.’’

13 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by

14 this section applies to payments received after December

15 31, 1992, as a result of destruction or damage occurring

16 after such date.

Æ