alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED S TATES ENVIRONMEN T AL PROTECTION AGENCY WASHINGTON , D
. C. 20460

Mr. Steve Maho n ey Manager of Regulatory Affai r s S

u per i or Oil Com p a n y , I nc. 1402 North Capito l Avenue Su ite 1 00 Indiana p olis, IN 46202 

### SEP 08 2014 OFFICE OF CHEM I CAL SAFETY AND POLLUTION PREVENTION

Re: Conditional Exempt ion to 

### a Test R ule Issued Under Sect i on 4 of the Toxic Su bsta n ces Control Act for CAS RN 98-56-6 Dear Mr. Mahoney : The U
. S. Env i ronmental P r otection Agency ( EPA) is cond itionall y gran ting Superior Oil Company's exemption application for the test requirements issued un der secti on 4 of th e Tox i c Substances Contro l Act for benzene , 1-chloro- 4 -(trifl u orome thyl)

- (a.k.a , PCB T F) (CASRN 98- 56

- 6) (Testing of Certain High Production Volume Chemicals; Third Group of Chemicals, 76 FR 653 8 5 , October 2 1 , 201 1 ). The EPA has d e termined tha t Superior Oi l Company ' s exemption application , submi tted b y Greenwich Chemical Consu lting, Inc., and dated August 27 , 2014 , fulfi ll s the requirements for a conditional exemption as described in 40 CFR part 790, subpart E. The EPA test ru le reg ul ations at 4 0 CFR 790, subpart E, allow the EPA to exempt comp anies f rom test r ule requi rements when another company i s a lready conducting th e require d test i ng, as long as the exe m pt comp any app li es for a n exemption and includes a statement of financial responsibi l ity at 40 CFR section 79 0 .99
. Exemptions are also cond i tioned on the E PA receiving acceptable test data that is adequate to fulfi ll the test rule requirement s . T esti ng for PCBTF is being condu ct ed by the PCBTF Tes t ing Consortium . If for reaso n s specified 

### in 40 CFR 790.93(a), the EPA s h ould te r minate Su p erior O il Comp any's conditiona l exempt i on , i t will be not ified by certifie d letter or by a Federal Register Notice
.

Internet Add r ess ( URL ) • http //www epa gov Recycled/ Re cycl a b l e • Pnnted with Vege t able Oil Based I nks on 100% Postconsumer
. Process Chlorine Free Recycl ed PaperIf you have any questions, please contact Mr. John Schaeffer by telephone at (202) 564-8173 or email at schaeffer.john@epa.gov. cc: Mr. John V. Massingale, Panel Manager PCBTF Testing Consortium, Greenwich Chemical Consulting, Inc. Docket EPA-HQ-OPPT-2009-0112

Paul Lewis, Ph.D. Chief, Chemical Information

and Testing Branch
#### James KASSNER et al., Appellants, v. The TRAVELERS INDEMNITY COMPANY, a foreign corporation, licensed and authorized to do business in the State of Florida, Appellee.

No. 73-419.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Nov. 27, 1973.

Levine, Helman & Reckson, Miami, for appellants.

Adams, George & Wood and David L. Willing, Miami, for appellee.

Before BARKDULL, C. J., and PEARSON and CARROLL, JJ.

CARROLL, Judge.

A policy issued by the appellee insured Maternity Modes, a partnership of which James and Erna Kassner and others were members, and also insured James and Erna Kassner as owners of the building and warehouse in which the partnership conducted a business. Following destruction by fire the Kassners (owners) filed an action against the insurer for recovery for loss of the building. Thereafter action was brought by the Kassners as members of and for the partnership, for business interruption loss sustained by the partnership. The court granted a motion of the insurer, and dismissed the second action, on the ground of splitting of causes of action. This appeal ensued.

The appellants contend, and we agree, that dismissal thereof on such ground was error. In the first action the Kassners enforced the cause of action held by them individually as the insured property owners. The second action was not brought by them in their individual capacity, but was by and for the separate partnership entity. See Gaynon v. Statum, 151 Fla. 793, 10 So.2d 432; Carol Management Corporation v. Maxwell Company, Fla.App.1963, 156 So.2d 773. In those cases the Supreme Court and this court, speaking with reference to splitting of causes of action, stated that as a general rule the law mandatorily requires that all damages sustained or acruing *to one*as a result of a single wrongful act must be claimed and recovered in one action or not at all.

*687The fact that separate independent causes of action under an insurance contract may have arisen and accrued to two different parties or entities from a single wrong or under one contract, does not preclude, but on the contrary requires their bringing separate actions thereon. Atlanta & St. A. B. Ry. Co. v. Thomas, 60 Fla. 412, 53 So. 510.

For the reasons stated, the judgment appealed from is reversed, and the cause is remanded for further proceedings.
#### AMERICAN SOUTHERN INSURANCE CO. v. CHARLES.

No. 39061.

Supreme Court of Florida.

March 1970.

Certiorari dismissed without opinion. 226 So.2d 476.
EX-4.1



  
 



 
  
 Exhibit 4.1 03938 9524 COMMON STOCK NUMBER COMMON STOCK P SHARES
THIS CERTIFICATE IS TRANSFERABLE IN CANTON, MA JERSEY CITY, NJ AND COLLEGE STATION, TX INCORPORATED UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA UNITED BANKSHARES, INC. CUSIP 909907 10 7 THIS CERTIFIES THAT SPECIMEN is the owner of shares, of the
par value of two dollars and fifty cents ($2.50) each, of the Common Capital Stock of UNITED BANKSHARES, INC. hereinafter called the “Corporation”, transferable only on the books of the Corporation by the holder hereof in person, or by
duly authorized attorney upon surrender of this certificate, properly endorsed. The amount of Common Capital Stock of the Corporation is set forth on the books of the Corporation together with a description of such Common Capital Stock and of the
respective rights, preferences, privileges, voting rights, powers, restrictions, limitations and qualifications thereof as set forth in the Articles of Association of the Corporation, as amended or to be amended hereafter, which Articles of
Association and any and all amendments thereof are on file at the office of the Corporation and are hereby expressly incorporated herein by reference and to all of which the holder, by acceptance hereof, hereby agrees and assents. Witness the
facsimile seal of the Corporation and the facsimile signatures of its duly authorized officers. DATED COUNTERSIGNED AND REGISTERED COMPUTERSHARE INC. TRANSFER AGENT AND REGISTRAR BY AUTHORIZED SIGNATURE UNITED BANKSHARES, INC. CORPORATE SEAL
CHARLESTON WEST VIRGINIA SECRETARY CHAIRMAN OF THE BOARD q SECURITY-COLUMBIAN UNITED STATES BANKNOTE COMPANY 1960 CERTIFICATE OF STOCK 







 



 
  
 The following abbreviations, when used in the inscription on the
face of this Certificate, shall be construed as though they were written out in full according to applicable laws or regulations; TEN COM – as tenants in common TEN ENT – as tenants by the entireties JT TEN – as joint tenants with
right of survivorship and not as tenants in common UNIF GIFT MIN ACT Custodian (Cust) (Minor) under Uniform Gifts to Minors Act (State) Additional abbreviations may also be used though not in the above list. For value received, hereby sell, assign
and transfer unto PLEASE INSERT SOCIAL SECURITY OR OTHER IDENTIFYING NUMBER OF ASSIGNEE (PLEASE PRINT OR TYPE NAME AND ADDRESS, INCLUDING ZIP CODE, OF ASSIGNEE) of the shares represented by the within Certificate and do hereby irrevocably constitute
and appoint attorney to transfer the said shares on the books of the Corporation with full power of substitution in the premises. Dated: 20. Your Signature: Signature guaranteed: (Sign exactly as your name appears on the other side of this Security)
Signature gurantee should be made by a guarantor institution participating in the Securities Transfer Agents Medallion Program or in such other program acceptable to the Registrar.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

DARNELL HOWELL,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 353 WAL 2018

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 13th day of February, 2019

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED

.
U.S. Department 

of Transportation 

Federal Aviation 

Administration 

August 16,2012 

New England Region 

Office of the Regional Counsel 

FACSIMILE (202) 366-7536 & U.S. FIRST CLASS MAIL 

The Honorable J.E. Sullivan, ALJ 

Office of Hearings 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. (Ell-310) 

Washington, D.C. 20590 

In the Matter of Daniel Quinonez 

Docket No. FAA-2012-0473 

Case No. 2012EA610020 

Dear Judge Sullivan: 

12 New England Executive Park 

Burlington, MA 01803-5299 

Telephone: (781) 238-7058 

FAX: (781) 238-7055 

As the parties have settled this matter, enclosed please find a Joint Withdrawal of Appeal and 

Complaint in the above-referenced matter. 

Sincerely, 

R. BENNETT SARGENT 

Attorney 

Enclosures 

cc: Hearing Docket 

Mr. Daniel Quinonez RECEIVED 

AUG 2 1 2012 

HEARING DOCKET 
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION 

In the matter of: 

FAA Case No. 2012EA610020 

DA.1"1IEL QUINONEZ, 

FAA Docket No. F AA-2012-0473 

Respondent 

Date: August 13,2012 

Judge J.E. Sullivan 

JOINT \VITHDRA W AL OF APPEAL & COMPLAINT 

The parties in the above-captioned action have settled this case and pursuant to 

Section 13.215 of the Rules of Practice in FAA Civil Penalty Actions 14 C.F.R. § 13.215 

Complainant hereby withdraws its Complaint and Respondent hereby withdraws his 

request for hearing. 

Respectful!;.· submitted, 

TT SARGENT, Attorney 

Federal A viatwn Administration 

Office of the Regional Counsel 

11 New England Executive Park 

Burlmgton, Massachusetts, 01803-5299 

Tel: 781-238-7058 

' 

.I 11 . . .· 

. 

Frances A. Vargas 

for Daniel Quinonez, Respondent 

1012 Eastern A venue 

Fall River. 1\1A 02723 

Tel: 508-496-8710 
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I certify that the foregoing has been mailed this date by First Class U.S. Mail, to: 

Respondent 

Mr. Daniel Quinonez 

c/o Frances Vargas 

1012 Eastern A venue 

Fall River, MA 02723 

I certify that the foregoing has been sent via Facsimile and by First Class U.S. 

Mail this date to: 

Administrative Law Judge 

The Honorable J.E. Sullivan 

Office of Hearings, M-20 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. (Ell-310) 

Washington, DC 20590 

Fax: (202) 366-7536 

And 

Hearing Docket (Original & One copy) 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence A venue, SW 

Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2W1000 

Washington, DC 20591 

Fax: (202) 493-5142 

Attn: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Y; Dated August 

aralegal/Management Program Analyst
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                          19,378
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    9,595
<ALLOWANCES>                                       536
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                31,797
<PP&E>                                           7,808
<DEPRECIATION>                                   2,661
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  44,606
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           19,704
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           79,373
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           180
<OTHER-SE>                                    (56,569)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    44,606
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                14,808
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    8,104
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                36,112
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   315
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 230
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (29,208)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       136
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (29,344)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (29,344)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (2.72)<F1>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (2.72)
<FN>
<F1>THE COMPANY EFFECTED A 1 FOR 2 REVERSE STOCK SPLIT ON SEPTEMBER 21, 2000. PRIOR
FINANCIAL DATA SCHEDULES HAVE NOT BEEN RESTATED TO EFFECT THE REVERSE STOCK
SPLIT.
</FN>


</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 158 (Wednesday, August 15, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Page 40540]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-17474]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Mental Health; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Mental Health Initial 
Review Group; Mental Health Services Research Committee.
    Date: October 15, 2018.
    Time: 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: The Fairmont Washington, DC, 2401 M Street NW, 
Washington, DC 20037.
    Contact Person: Aileen Schulte, Ph.D., Scientific Review 
Officer, Division of Extramural Activities, National Institute of 
Mental Health, NIH, Neuroscience Center, 6001 Executive Blvd., Room 
6136, MSC 9606, Bethesda, MD 20852, 301-443-1225, 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#e48597878c91889081a489858d88ca8a8d8cca838b92"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="19786a7a716c756d7c597478707537777071377e766f">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program No. 93.242, Mental 
Health Research Grants, National Institutes of Health, HHS)


    Dated: August 9, 2018.
Melanie J. Pantoja,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2018-17474 Filed 8-14-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
# C_2015126EN.01000101.xml

| 18.4.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 126/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.4.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 126/1

---

Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 TFEU

Cases where the Commission raises no objections

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2015/C 126/01)

| Date of adoption of the decision | 16.10.2014 | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Aid number | SA.36262 (2014/N) |
| Member State | Ireland |
| Region | — | — |
| Title (and/or name of the beneficiary) | Restructuring and stabilisation scheme for the Credit Union Sector in Ireland |
| Legal basis | Credit Union Bill 2012 |
| Type of measure | Scheme | — |
| Objective | Restructuring firms in difficulty |
| Form of aid | Other forms of equity intervention — Recapitalisation |
| Budget | Overall budget: EUR 280 (in millions) |
| Intensity | — |
| Duration (period) | 15.10.2014 - 1.4.2015 |
| Economic sectors | FINANCIAL AND INSURANCE ACTIVITIES |
| Name and address of the granting authority | Department of Finance |
| Government Buildings |
| Upper Merrion Street |
| Dublin 2 |
| IRELAND |

Date of adoption of the decision

16.10.2014

Aid number

SA.36262 (2014/N)

Member State

Ireland

Region

—

—

Title (and/or name of the beneficiary)

Restructuring and stabilisation scheme for the Credit Union Sector in Ireland

Legal basis

Credit Union Bill 2012

Type of measure

Scheme

—

Objective

Restructuring firms in difficulty

Form of aid

Other forms of equity intervention — Recapitalisation

Budget

Overall budget: EUR 280 (in millions)

Intensity

—

Duration (period)

15.10.2014 - 1.4.2015

Economic sectors

FINANCIAL AND INSURANCE ACTIVITIES

Name and address of the granting authority

Department of Finance

Government Buildings

Upper Merrion Street

Dublin 2

IRELAND

Other information

—

The authentic text(s) of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found at: http://ec.europa.eu/competition/elojade/isef/index.cfm

---
#### THE FLORIDA BAR, Complainant, v. Donald E. WILKES, Respondent.

No. 34886.

Supreme Court of Florida.

June 28, 1967.

Donald C. Jacobson, Daytona Beach, for The Florida Bar, complainant.

Donald E. Wilkes, in pro. per.

PER CURIAM.

The Respondent’s motion for reinstatement to active status at The Florida Bar is denied. Under our second opinion, 199 So. 2d 472, filed April 19, 1967, Respondent is entitled at the present time to demonstrate to The Florida Bar that he has rehabilitated himself and should be reinstated to practice. Respondent’s attention is directed to Rule VIII (2) of the Integration Rules of The Florida Bar, 31 F.S.A. with respect to the matter of Florida Bar dues.

THORNAL, C. J., and THOMAS, ROBERTS, CALDWELL and ERVIN, JJ., concur.
p. 1 

# OAR Box 1828 Prepped by Ollie Stewart



### Document

Number: 

# 245 ) ll-K - (I ) -5 8 Docket Number: 

# A-83-2 7

Printed 11/12/2008 11:12:57AM Sheet 245of 325P. 2

II-K-(I)-5 8
DEPRECIATION . Interna l Revenu e Service , Publicatio n534 . Novembe r 1979 . THI S INFORMATION

CA N B E FOUND I

N DOCKE T A-79-02 , ITE

M II-K-(I)-5 8
FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JOSE LUIS MEDINA-LARA,

 Petitioner,

 v.

ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 13-70491

Agency No. A079-361-360

ORDER

Before: NOONAN, HAWKINS, and CHRISTEN, Circuit Judges.

For reasons to be set forth in a disposition which will follow in due course, we

grant Medina–Lara’s petition for review because the government did not meet its

burden to show that his California convictions constitute predicate offenses for

purposes of removability under 8 U.S.C. § 1227(a)(2). We, therefore, order the

United States to release Medina–Lara from custody immediately.

SO ORDERED. 

FILED

AUG 25 2014

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
#### Brown, Appellant, *v.*Schwartz.

Argued October 15, 1941.

Before Keller, P. J., Cunningham, Baldrige, Stadteeld, Rhodes and Hirt, JJ.

*473December 10, 1941:

*G. Thomas Jackson,*for appellant.

*Palmer Watson,*for appellee.

Opinion by

Keller, P. J.,

We need not pass upon the question whether the court below was right in its reason for discharging the rule granted in this case, viz., that in the lease for the premises involved the lessee had waived the right of appeal. Nor need we discuss whether the authority of the ruling of this court in *Maxwell v. Hausman, 71*Pa. Superior Ct. 83, relied on by the lower court, has been weakened by the later decision of the Supreme Court in *Curry v. Bacharach Quality Shops, Inc.,*271 Pa. 364, 373, 117 A. 435, and the cases following it. See, inter alia, *Markeim-Chalmers-Ludington v. Mead,*140 Pa. Superior Ct. 480, 495, 14 A. 2d 152. For we are of opinion that the action of the court was justified on the merits, and that it was incumbent on the appellant, in order to appeal from the judgment of the magistrate —ordering that the leased premises be delivered up to the lessor — and prevent the issuance of a writ of possession, to “give good, sufficient and absolute security by recognizance,” within five days after the rendition of the judgment, “for all costs that may have and may accrue, in case the judgment shall be affirmed, and also for all rent .that has accrued, or may accrue, up to the time of final judgment” (Act of April 3, 1830, P. L. 187, 68 PS §392). See *Haines v. Levin,*51 Pa. 412, 414.

As the testimony at the hearing showed that rent was due and in arrears at that time by the appellant in the amount of $601.70, under a lease calling for the payment of $20 per month in advance, the magistrate had no authority to accept a bond or recognizance on appeal in the amount of $246.65; and whether that amount *474was preliminarily suggested by the magistrate bimself, —as averred by appellant, — or by his clerk — as averred by appellee — under the mistaken impression that the recognizance need only secure the rent to accrue in the future, the act of assembly provided otherwise and the magistrate could not legally approve a bond in that amount. Nor could the court below in this proceeding order the magistrate to approve a bond or recognizance contrary to the provisions of the act; or order him to certify an appeal to the court of common pleas, unless a recognizance, with good, sufficient and absolute security for all costs accrued and to accrue and also for *all rent that had accrued and might accrue*up to the time of final judgment on the appeal, had been entered, or tendered, by the appellant.

The appeal is dismissed at the costs of the appellant.
**Exhibit 32.2**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

The undersigned hereby certifies, in his capacity as the Principal Financial Officer of China ShouGuan Mining Corporation (the “Company”), for the purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of his knowledge:

(1)  The Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2016 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

| Dated:   November 18, 2016

/s/ Chengqing Tan

  

Chengqing Tan 

Principal Financial Officer

 

(Principal Financial Officer)

This certification accompanies each Report pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of §18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request. |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|