alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>
                                                                Exhibit 23.1

                     CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

      We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements on Form S-8 (No. 333-48364, 333-38420, 333-31696, 333-93117,
333-92327, 333-11294, 333-88421 and 333-39553) of our report dated March 27,
2002, except as to Note 25, which is as of August 23, 2002, relating to the
financial statements and financial statement schedule of Applied Digital
Solutions, Inc. as of December 31, 2002 and for each of the two years ended
December 31, 2001 and 2000, which appears in this Form 10-K.



PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

St. Louis, Missouri
March 31, 2003
----

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

(Fourth Chamber)

of 18 November 2004

in Case C-422/03 Commission of the European Communities v Kingdom of the Netherlands (1)

(Failure of a Member State to fulfil its obligations - Directive 2001/18/EC - Failure to transpose within the prescribed period)

(2005/C 6/28)

Language of the case: Dutch

In Case C-422/03 Commission of the European Communities (Agent: M. van Beek) v Kingdom of the Netherlands (Agents: H.G. Sevenster and J. van Bakel) – action under Article 226 EC for failure to fulfil obligations, brought on 3 October 2003 – the Court (Fourth Chamber), composed of: J.N. Cunha Rodrigues, acting for the President of the Fourth Chamber, K, Schiemann (Rapporteur) and E. Juhász, Judges; P. Léger, Advocate General; R. Grass, Registrar, gave a judgment on 18 November 2004, in which it:

----

(1)OJ C 275 of 15.11.2003.

----
Note: This disposition is nonprecedential.


## United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

2006-7378

JOHNNIE COLLINS,

Claimant-Appellant,

v.

R. JAMES NICHOLSON, Secretar y of Veterans Affairs,

Respondent-Appellee.

James L. Harris , of Nashville, Tennessee, for claimant-appellant.

Martin F. Hockey, Jr. , Senior Trial Counsel, Commercial Litigation Branch, Civil Division, United States Depar tment of Justice, of Wash ington, DC, for respondentappellee. With him on the brief was Peter D. Keisler , Assistant Attorney General. Of counsel on the brief were Michael J. Timinski , Assistant General Counsel.

Appealed from: United States Cour t of Appeals for Veterans Claims

Chief Judge William P. Greene, Jr.Note: This disposition is nonprecedential. 

## United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

2006-7378

JOHNNIE M. COLLINS,

Claimant-Appellant,

v.

R. JAMES NICHOLSON, Secretar y of Veterans Affairs,

Respondent-Appellee.

_______________ ___________ DECIDED: June 11, 2007

__________________________

Before MICHEL, Chief Judge , DYK, Circuit Judge , and OTERO, District Judge

. ∗

MICHEL, Chief Judge

.

Petitioner Johnnie M. Collins appeals from an en banc dec ision of the U.S. Court

of Appeals for Veterans Claims (“Veterans Court”) dismissing Mr. Collins’s appeal on

the ground that his Notice of Appeal was not timely filed under 38 U.S.C. § 7266(c).

Rios v. Nicholson , 20 Vet. App. 104 (2006) (en banc). Because the Veterans Court

erred by precluding Mr. Collins from relyin g upon the common law mailbox rule to show

timely filing, we reverse and remand for furt her proceedings consistent with our decision

in Rios v. Nicholson , No. 2006-7352 (Fed. Cir. June 11, 2007).

REVERSED AND REMANDED

.

∗ Honorable S. James Otero, District Judge, United States District Court for the Central District of Californ ia, sitting by designation.
#### Thomas V. SCOTT, Appellant, v. Gloria SCOTT, Appellee.

No. 71-941.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Dec. 5, 1972.

Donald S. Reisman, Hallandale, for appellant.

Weintraub & Weintraub, Miami, for ap-pellee.

Before PEARSON, CHARLES CARROLL and HENDRY, JJ.

*705PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from the property provisions of a final judgment dissolving the marriage of the parties. The former husband contends that the trial court proceeded improperly by awarding certain real property to the wife and other real property to himself. See Banfi v. Banfi, Fla.App. 1960, 123 So.2d 52. In addition, the appellant contends the amounts awarded as lump sum alimony and attorney’s fees are excessive.

Our review of the record convinces us that the court properly proceeded upon the petition of both parties to determine the equitable distribution of the jointly held properties. The division did not amount to a partition of the properties because the court merely followed a settlement agreement made but not executed by the parties.

Affirmed.
<PAGE>

                                                                 EXHIBIT 23.2

                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS


The Board of Directors
Network Computing Devices, Inc.:

We consent to incorporation herein by reference in the registration statement on
Form S-8 of Network Computing Devices, Inc. (the Company) of our report dated
February 10, 2000, except for Note 11, which is as of March 30, 2000, relating
to the consolidated balance sheets of Network Computing Devices, Inc. and
subsidiaries as of December 31, 1999 and 1998, and the related consolidated
statements of operations, stockholders' equity, and cash flows for each of the
years in the three-year period ended December 31, 1999, which report appears in
the December 31, 1999 annual report on Form 10-K of Network Computing Devices,
Inc., and our report dated February 10, 2000, on the related financial schedule
which appears in the 1999 annual report on Form 10-K.

Our report on the consolidated financial statements, dated February 10, 2000,
except for Note 11, which is as of March 30, 2000, contains an explanatory
paragraph that states that as discussed in Note 1 to the consolidated financial
statements, the Company has suffered recurring losses from operations and has a
net capital deficiency that raises substantial doubt about its ability to
continue as a going concern. Management's plan in regard to these matters are
also described in Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements. The financial
statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of
this uncertainty.


/s/ KPMG LLP

Mountain View, California
September 25, 2000
<partyblock><br><br><div align="center"><b><font size="+1">Jose R. Cespedes, Plaintiff-Respondent, Dr.<br><br>against<br><br>Nelson Echavarria, Defendant-Appellant.</font></b></div><br><br><p>Defendant appeals from a judgment of the Civil Court of the City of New York, New York County (Lisa A. Sokoloff, J.), entered December 7, 2017, after a nonjury trial, in favor of the plaintiff and awarding him damages in the principal sum of $10,000.</p><p>Per Curiam.</p><p>Judgment (Lisa A. Sokoloff, J.), entered December 7, 2017, affirmed, without costs.</p><p>On a nonjury trial, the decision of the fact-finding court should not be disturbed on appeal unless the court's conclusions could not have been reached under any fair interpretation of the evidence (<i>see Thoreson v Penthouse Intl.,</i> 80 NY2d 490, 495 [1992]). Applying that review standard here, we sustain the judgment in plaintiff's favor. The totality of the evidence before the trial court supports the determination that defendant failed to repay $10,000 that was loaned or entrusted to him by plaintiff. The evidence supporting the determination consisted of plaintiff's credited testimony and two letters signed by the defendant acknowledging the $10,000 debt and promising to return said sum to plaintiff within thirty days of the date of the letter. The trial court, which was in a position to assess the credibility of witnesses, rejected the testimony of defendant and his witnesses and properly concluded that defendant's contentions of fraud and illegality were untenable and unsupported.</p><p>Defendant's remaining contentions are either unpreserved for appellate review or without merit.</p><p>THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE COURT.</p><p>I concur I concur</p><br>Decision Date: December 20, 2019<br><br><div align="center"><form method="LINK" action="../../slipidx/at_1_idxtable.shtml"><input type="submit" value="Return to Decision List"></form></div></partyblock>
# C_2015402EN.01001601.xml

| 4.12.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 402/16 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.12.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 402/16

---

Information communicated by Member States regarding closure of fisheries

(2015/C 402/11)

In accordance with Article 35(3) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1224/2009 of 20 November 2009 establishing a Community control system for ensuring compliance with the rules of the common fisheries policy (1), a decision has been taken to close the fishery as set down in the following table:

1

| Date and time of closure | 17.10.2015 |
| --- | --- |
| Duration | 17.10–31.12.2015 |
| Member State | Belgium |
| Stock or Group of stocks | SRX/67AKXD |
| Species | Skates and rays (Rajiformes) |
| Zone | Union waters of VIa, VIb, VIIa-c and VIIe-k |
| Type(s) of fishing vessels | — |
| Reference number | 62/TQ104 |

Date and time of closure

17.10.2015

Duration

17.10–31.12.2015

Member State

Belgium

Stock or Group of stocks

SRX/67AKXD

Species

Skates and rays (Rajiformes)

Rajiformes

Zone

Union waters of VIa, VIb, VIIa-c and VIIe-k

Type(s) of fishing vessels

—

Reference number

62/TQ104

---

(1)  OJ L 343, 22.12.2009, p. 1.

1

---
EXHIBIT 12.1

                              Congoleum Corporation
      Statement Regarding Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges
                             (Dollars in thousands)
                                  December 31,

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                       2005          2004           2003            2002           2001
                                                    --------------------------------------------------------------------

<S>                                                 <C>            <C>            <C>            <C>            <C>
Earnings :
----------

Income from continuing operations                   $(21,575)      $  2,948       $ (6,762)      $(19,273)      $ (1,640)
Income tax expense(benefit)                           (2,575)        (2,545)        (3,874)            92           (506)
Interest expense - gross                              10,411          9,675          9,217          8,625          8,629
Capitalized interest                                     (76)          (228)          (311)          (250)          (330)
Amortization of debt origination costs                   336            495            509            559            386
Interest portion of rental expense (est.)              1,254          1,330          1,214          1,223          1,214
                                                    --------------------------------------------------------------------

Adjusted earnings                                   $(12,225)      $ 11,675       $     (7)      $ (9,024)      $  7,753
                                                    ====================================================================

Fixed Charges :
---------------

Interest expense, net of capitalized interest       $ 10,335       $  9,447       $  8,906       $  8,375       $  8,299
Capitalized interest                                      76            228            311            250            330
Amortization of debt origination costs                   336            495            509            559            386
Interest portion of rental expense (est.)              1,254          1,330          1,214          1,223          1,214
                                                    --------------------------------------------------------------------

Fixed Charges                                       $ 12,001       $ 11,500       $ 10,940       $ 10,407       $ 10,229
                                                    ====================================================================

Ratio of adjusted earnings to fixed charges           N/A(1)            1.0         N/A(2)         N/A(3)         N/A(4)
                                                    ====================================================================
</TABLE>

(1)   Earnings were inadequate to cover fixed charges by $24,226.
(2)   Earnings were inadequate to cover fixed charges by $10,947.
(3)   Earnings were inadequate to cover fixed charges by $19,431.
(4)   Earnings were inadequate to cover fixed charges by $2,476.
# C_2015367EN.01000603.xml

| 5.11.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 367/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.11.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 367/6

---

EUROPEAN INSTITUTE FOR GENDER EQUALITY

Publication of the final accounts for the financial year 2014

(2015/C 367/22)

The complete version of the final accounts may be found at the following address:

http://eige.europa.eu/about-eige/documents-registry? t=annual%20accounts

---
EXHIBIT 32.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                                   PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Dean Konstantine, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge,
E-Band Media, Inc.'s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended
September 30, 2010 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in
such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the
financial condition and results of operations of E-Band Media, Inc.


Date: 11/11/10                             By: /s/ Dean Konstantine
                                               ---------------------------------
                                           Name:  Dean Konstantine
                                           Title: Chief Executive Officer
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 3683

To amend the Community Reinvestment Act of 1977 to permit any loan

by an insured depository institution the proceeds of which are used

for the certified rehabilitation of a certified historical structure to be

taken into account in connection with an assessment of such institution

for purposes of such Act.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

NOVEMBER 22, 1993

Mr. PETERSON of Florida introduced the following bill; which was referred to

the Committee on Banking, Finance and Urban Affairs

A BILL

To amend the Community Reinvestment Act of 1977 to

permit any loan by an insured depository institution the

proceeds of which are used for the certified rehabilitation

of a certified historical structure to be taken into account

in connection with an assessment of such institution

for purposes of such Act.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Community Reinvest5 ment Credit for Historical Preservation’’.
2

•HR 3683 IH

1 SEC. 2. CRA CREDIT FOR CERTAIN HISTORIC TRUST PRES2 ERVATION FINANCING.

3 Section 804 of the Community Reinvestment Act of

4 1977 (12 U.S.C. 2903) is amended by adding at the end

5 the following new subsection:

6 ‘‘(c) HISTORIC TRUST PRESERVATION FINANCING.—

7 In assessing and taking into account, under subsection

8 (a), the record of a regulated financial institution, the ap9 propriate Federal financial supervisory agency shall con10 sider loans made by the institution the proceeds of which

11 were used for certified rehabilitations of certified historic

12 structures (as such terms are defined in section 47(c) of

13 the Internal Revenue Code of 1986).’’

Æ
----

Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATIONPursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350 (Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002) 

In connection with theQuarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Corridor Ventures I Acquisition Corp. (the"Company") for the quarter ended September 30, 2010, as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), David K.Waldman, President (Principal Executive Officer) and Principal AccountingOfficer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, asadopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 

(1) The Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and 

(2) The information contained in theReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Company. 

| Date: November 15, 2010 

 
By:    /s/ David K. Waldman                                     Name: David K. Waldman     Title: CEO and CFO                  Principal Executive Officer                  Principal Financial Officer 
  |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
f)C;T- o>T- /'¥17- ~.).2? 

. Venango County 

Venango Regional Airport 

Chess Lamberton Field 

Comm issioncrs 

Timothy S. Bmoks 

Vincent L. Withcrup 

llonnie S. Summet·s 

Airport Manager 

Otho C. Bell 

1560 Airport Road Franldin, PA 16323 814/432-5333 Fax 814/432-2684 

March 19,2015 

Mr. Kevin Schlemmer 

Chief, EAS & Domestic Analysis Division 

United States Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Ave., SE 

Washington, DC 20590 

RE: OST-1997-2523 (FKL EAS) 

Dear Mr. Schlemmer: 

r __ ., 

._., 

Sun Air Express has requested that the Airport Operator, County of Venango, consider 

the temporary use of Cessna Grand Caravan equipment on selected flights at Venango Regional 

Airport (FKL) while the Piper Chieftain PAJl-350 aircraft shall remain the based aircran for at 

least the daily originating and terminating flights. This act.ion would help provide the airline 

·added scheduling flexibility as flight crew and equipment infrastructure is completed, thereby 

benefitting all the cities they serve under EAS in our region. · 

We understand that the Caravan is a single engine turbo-prop, and as such, does not meet 

the Department's twin-engine minimum service requirement and we do not waive our right to 

twin engine service. We do agree, however, to waive that right temporarily for a period not to 

exceed sixty (60) days from the first day of operation of the single engine equipment for use on_ 

. flights current!y designated as 2383 and 2384 that operate FKL-PIT at 1120 EDT and PIT-FKL at 

1300 EDT. We will consider additional flight legs individually if requested by Sun Air. No 

change to the existing subsidy levels would be requested or required. 

Sincerely, 

Otho C. Bell 

Airport Manager 

OCB/jkw
II

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 3341

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

NOVEMBER 3 (legislative day, NOVEMBER 2), 1993

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs

AN ACT

To amend title 38, United States Code, to increase the

rate of special pension payable to persons who have

received the Congressional Medal of Honor.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. INCREASE IN RATE OF SPECIAL PENSION FOR

4 PERSONS ON THE MEDAL OF HONOR ROLL.

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 1562(a) of title 38,

6 United States Code, is amended by striking ‘‘$200’’ and

7 inserting ‘‘$400’’.
2

HR 3341 RFS

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by

2 subsection (a) shall apply with respect to months begin3 ning after the date of the enactment of this Act.

Passed the House of Representatives November 2,

1993.

Attest: DONNALD K. ANDERSON,

Clerk.
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.
1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of UBI Blockchain
Internet, LTD (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the three months ended November 30, 2016, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Chan Cheung, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, to the best of my knowledge and belief, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

| | i. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C.
78m(a) or 78o(d)); and
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | ii. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: January 23, 2017





/s/ Chan Cheung

Chan Cheung

(Principal
Financial Officer)
EXHIBIT 31.1





CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO


SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Peter Reichard, certify that:




1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Europa Aquisition VI, Inc.;




2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;




3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;




4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:




a. designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;




b. evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this quarterly report based on such evaluation; and




c. disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and




5. I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):




a. all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting, which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and




b. any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.






Date: March 30, 2011By:
/s/ Peter ReichardPeter ReichardPresident and Director