Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 168 / Tuesday, August 31, 2010 / Proposed Rules 53267 

b. Review Under the Regulatory 

Flexibility Act 

This proposed rule has been reviewed 

under the Regulatory Flexibility Act 

(Pub. L. 96–354) which requires the 

preparation of a regulatory flexibility 

analysis for any regulation that will 

have a significant economic impact on 

a substantial number of small entities 

(i.e., small businesses and small 

governments). Due to the nature of the 

waterway and the minimal historic use 

of this portion of Eagle Bay for travel, 

recreation or fishing, as well as the 

availability of an alternate channel 

within Knik Arm, the Corps expects that 

the economic impact of this portion of 

the restricted area would have 

practically no impact on the public and 

no anticipated navigational hazard or 

interference with existing waterway 

traffic, and accordingly, certifies that 

this proposed rule will have no 

significant economic impact on small 

entities. 

c. Review Under the National 

Environmental Policy Act 

Due to the administrative nature of 

this action and because there is no 

intended change in the use of the area, 

the Corps expects that this regulation, if 

adopted, will not have a significant 

impact to the quality of the human 

environment and, therefore, preparation 

of an environmental impact statement, 

for the establishment of this restricted 

area, is not required. An environmental 

assessment (EA) will be prepared after 

the public notice comment period is 

closed and all comments have been 

received and considered. After it is 

prepared, it may be reviewed at the 

District office listed at the end of the 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT

section, above. 

d. Unfunded Mandates Act 

This proposed rule does not impose 

an enforceable duty upon the private 

sector. Therefore, it is not a Federal 

private sector mandate and is not 

subject to the requirements of Section 

202 or 205 of the Unfunded Mandates 

Act. We have also found under Section 

203 of the Act, that small Governments 

will not be significantly and uniquely 

affected by this rulemaking. 

List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 334 

Danger zones, Marine safety, 

Navigation (water), Restricted areas, 

Waterways. 

For the reasons stated in the 

preamble, the Corps proposes to amend 

33 CFR part 334 as follows: 

PART 334—DANGER ZONE AND 

RESTRICTED AREA REGULATIONS 

1. The authority citation for 33 CFR 

part 334 continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 40 Stat. 266 (33 U.S.C. 1) and 

40 Stat. 892 (33 U.S.C. 3). 

2. Add § 334.1305 to read as follows: 

§ 334.1305 Eagle River Flats Weapons 

Training Range Impact Area, Fort 

Richardson, Alaska; Restricted Area. 

(a) The area. The danger zone shall 

encompass all navigable waters of Eagle 

River, as defined at 33 CFR part 329, 

beginning at Eagle River Flats Bravo 

Bridge at latitude 61°18′39.33′′ N, 

longitude 149°41′15.68′′ W on Fort 

Richardson, Alaska extending along the 

shore downstream to the river’s outflow 

to Eagle Bay in the Knik Arm, as well 

as those waters of Eagle Bay to the east 

of a demarcation line drawn from a 

point of Fort Richardson land located at 

latitude 61°22′19.195′′ N, longitude 

149°43′20.730′′ W to a point of Fort 

Richardson land located at latitude 

61°19′39.168′′ N, longitude 

149°46′32.204′′ W. 

(b) The regulations. To ensure public 

safety, the restricted area shall be closed 

to all watercraft navigation and persons 

at all times, except for vessels and 

individuals engaged in operational and 

maintenance activities authorized by the 

Commander, U.S. Army Garrison 

Alaska. 

(c) Enforcement. This regulation shall 

be enforced by the Commander, U.S. 

Army Garrison Alaska or other such 

agencies as the Commander may 

designate. 

Dated: August 13, 2010. 

Michael G. Ensch, 

Chief, Operations, Directorate of Civil Works. 

[FR Doc. 2010–21735 Filed 8–30–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3720–58–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

40 CFR Parts 141 and 142 

[EPA–HQ–OW–2008–0878; FRL–9195–5] 

RIN 2040–AD94 

National Primary Drinking Water 

Regulations: Revisions to the Total 

Coliform Rule; Extension of Comment 

Period 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA). 

ACTION: Extension of comment period. 

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA) is extending by 30 days 

the public comment period for a 

proposed National Primary Drinking 

Water Regulation, the Revisions to the 

Total Coliform Rule (RTCR), which was 

published in the Federal Register on 

July 14, 2010. This extended comment 

period will afford greater opportunity to 

all interested parties to review and 

submit comments on the proposal. 

DATES: Comments must be received on 

or before October 13, 2010. 

ADDRESSES: Comments may be 

submitted by mail to: Water Docket, 

Environmental Protection Agency, Mail 

Code 28221T, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., 

NW., Washington, DC 20460, Attention 

Docket ID No. EPA–HQ–OW–2008– 

0878. Comments may also be submitted 

electronically or through hand delivery/ 

courier by following the instructions 

provided in the SUPPLEMENTARY

INFORMATION section. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For 

technical inquiries, contact Sean 

Conley, Office of Ground Water and 

Drinking Water (MC 4607M), U.S. 

Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 

Pennsylvania Ave., NW., Washington, 

DC 20460; telephone (202) 564–1781. 

For general information, contact the 

Safe Drinking Water Hotline, Telephone 

(800) 426–4791 or e-mail: hotline-sdwa 

@epa.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The 

comment period for the proposed RTCR 

now ends on October 13, 2010. This is 

an extension of 30 days beyond the 

comment period established in the 

Federal Register on July 14, 2010. 

Anyone seeking to submit comments 

must follow the procedures specified in 

the SUMMARY section of the proposal as 

published in the Federal Register (75 

FR 40926, July 14, 2010). The RTCR 

applies to all public water systems. The 

proposed revisions require systems that 

have an indication of coliform 

contamination in the distribution 

system to assess the problem and take 

corrective action that may reduce cases 

of illnesses and deaths due to potential 

fecal contamination and waterborne 

pathogen exposure. This proposal also 

establishes criteria for systems to qualify 

for and stay on reduced monitoring, 

thereby providing incentives for 

improved water system operation. 

See the proposal as published in the 

Federal Register (75 FR 40926, July 14, 

2010) for additional information 

regarding public health concerns, 

proposed regulatory requirements, 

implementation schedules, estimated 

costs and benefits, implementation 

tools, and other issues. 


erowe on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with PROPOSALS
53268 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 168 / Tuesday, August 31, 2010 / Proposed Rules 

Dated: August 25, 2010. 

Cynthia C. Dougherty, 

Director, Office of Ground Water and Drinking 

Water. 

[FR Doc. 2010–21697 Filed 8–30–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

40 CFR Parts 239 and 258 

[EPA–R01–RCRA–2010–0676; FRL–9193–2] 

Adequacy of New Hampshire Municipal 

Solid Waste Landfill Permit Program 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA). 

ACTION: Proposed rule. 

SUMMARY: EPA Region 1 proposes to 

approve New Hampshire’s modification 

of its approved Municipal Solid Waste 

Landfill Program. On March 22, 2004, 

EPA issued final regulations allowing 

research, development, and 

demonstration (RD&D) permits to be 

issued to certain municipal solid waste 

landfills by approved states. On June 28, 

2010 New Hampshire submitted an 

application to EPA Region 1 seeking 

Federal approval of its RD&D 

requirements. 

DATES: Comments on this proposed 

action must be received in writing on or 

before November 1, 2010. 

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, 

identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R01– 

RCRA–2010–0676, by one of the 

following methods: 

• http://www.regulations.gov: Follow 

the on-line instructions for submitting 

comments. 

• E-mail: Hsieh.juiyu@epa.gov 

• Fax: (617) 918–0646, to the 

attention of Juiyu Hsieh 

• Mail: Send written comments to 

Juiyu Hsieh, RCRA Waste Management 

Section, Office of Site Remediation and 

Restoration (OSRR 07–1), EPA New 

England—Region I, 5 Post Office Square, 

Suite 100, Boston, MA 02109–3912 

• Hand Delivery or Courier: Deliver 

your comments to: Juiyu Hsieh, RCRA 

Waste Management Section, Office of 

Site Restoration and Remediation 

(OSRR 07–1), EPA New England— 

Region I, 5 Post Office Square, Suite 

100, Boston, MA 02109–3912. Such 

deliveries are only accepted during the 

Office’s normal hours of operation. 

For detailed instructions on how to 

submit comments, please see the direct 

final rule which is located in the Rules 

section of this Federal Register. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Juiyu Hsieh at (617) 918–1646 or by email at hsieh.juiyu@epa.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In the 

Rules section of this Federal Register, 

EPA is approving New Hampshire’s 

Research Development and 

Demonstration (RD&D) permit program 

through a direct final rule without prior 

proposal because the Agency views this 

as a noncontroversial action and 

anticipates no adverse comments to this 

action. Unless we get written adverse 

comments which oppose this approval 

during the comment period, the direct 

final rule will become effective on the 

date it establishes, and we will not take 

further action on this proposal. If EPA 

receives adverse comments, the direct 

final rule will be withdrawn and all 

public comments received will be 

addressed in a subsequent final rule. 

EPA will not institute a second 

comment period on this action. Any 

parties interested in commenting on this 

action should do so at this time. For 

additional information, see the direct 

rule which is located in the Rules 

section of this Federal Register. 

Dated: August 16, 2010. 

Ira W. Leighton, 

Acting Regional Administrator, EPA New 

England, Region 1. 

[FR Doc. 2010–21119 Filed 8–30–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

40 CFR Part 300 

[EPA–R04–SFUND–2010–0502; 

FRL–9194–2] 

National Oil and Hazardous 

Substances Pollution Contingency 

Plan; National Priorities List: Deletion 

of the Powersville Site Superfund Site 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency. 

ACTION: Proposed rule; notice of intent. 

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA) Region 4 is issuing a 

Notice of Intent to Delete the 

Powersville Site Superfund Site (Site) 

located in Peach County, Georgia, from 

the National Priorities List (NPL) and 

requests public comments on this 

proposed action. The NPL, promulgated 

pursuant to section 105 of the 

Comprehensive Environmental 

Response, Compensation, and Liability 

Act (CERCLA) of 1980, as amended, is 

an appendix of the National Oil and 

Hazardous Substances Pollution 

Contingency Plan (NCP). The EPA and 

the State of Georgia, through the Georgia 

Environmental Protection Division, 

have determined that all appropriate 

response actions under CERCLA, other 

than operation, maintenance, and fiveyear reviews, have been completed. 

However, this deletion does not 

preclude future actions under 

Superfund. 

DATES: Comments must be received by 

September 30, 2010. 

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, 

identified by Docket ID no. EPA–R04– 

SFUND–2010–0502, by one of the 

following methods: 

• http://www.regulations.gov. Follow 

online instructions for submitting 

comments. 

• Web site: http://www.epa.gov/

region4/waste/sf/enforce.htm. 

• E-mail: farrier.brian@epa.gov. 

• Fax: (404) 562–8896, Attention: 

Brian Farrier. 

• Mail: Brian Farrier, Remedial 

Project Manager, Superfund Remedial 

Section C, Superfund Remedial Branch, 

Superfund Division, U.S. Environmental 

Protection Agency, Region 4, 61 Forsyth 

Street, SW., Atlanta, Georgia 30303– 

8960. 

Hand Delivery: U.S. Environmental 

Protection Agency, Region 4, 61 Forsyth 

Street, SW., Atlanta, Georgia 30303– 

8960. Such deliveries are only accepted 

during the Docket’s normal hours of 

operation and special arrangements 

should be made for deliveries of boxed 

information. 

Instructions: Direct your comments to 

Docket ID no. EPA–R04–SFUND–2010– 

0502. EPA’s policy is that all comments 

received will be included in the public 

docket without change and may be 

made available online at http:// 

www.regulations.gov, including any 

personal information provided, unless 

the comment includes information 

claimed to be Confidential Business 

Information (CBI) or other information 

whose disclosure is restricted by statute. 

Do not submit information that you 

consider to be CBI or otherwise 

protected through http:// 

www.regulations.gov or e-mail. The 

http://www.regulations.gov Web site is 

an ‘‘anonymous access’’ system, which 

means EPA will not know your identity 

or contact information unless you 

provide it in the body of your comment. 

If you send an e-mail comment directly 

to EPA without going through http:// 

www.regulations.gov, your e-mail 

address will be automatically captured 

and included as part of the comment 

that is placed in the public docket and 

made available on the Internet. If you 

submit an electronic comment, EPA 

recommends that you include your 

name and other contact information in 

the body of your comment and with any 

disk or CD–ROM you submit. If EPA 

cannot read your comment due to 


erowe on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with PROPOSALS