alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2013287EN.01000601.xml

| 3.10.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 287/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.10.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 287/6

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

2 October 2013

2013/C 287/03

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,3515 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 131,76 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4586 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,83410 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 8,6550 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,2241 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,1320 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 25,606 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 296,70 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,7027 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,2190 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,4500 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,7275 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,4458 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,3988 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 10,4799 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,6410 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,6917 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 452,74 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 13,6652 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 8,2728 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,6200 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 15 305,17 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,3625 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 58,699 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 43,6318 |
| THB | Thai baht | 42,287 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 2,9927 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 17,8303 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 84,5920 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,3515

JPY

Japanese yen

131,76

DKK

Danish krone

7,4586

GBP

Pound sterling

0,83410

SEK

Swedish krona

8,6550

CHF

Swiss franc

1,2241

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,1320

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

25,606

HUF

Hungarian forint

296,70

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,7027

PLN

Polish zloty

4,2190

RON

Romanian leu

4,4500

TRY

Turkish lira

2,7275

AUD

Australian dollar

1,4458

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,3988

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

10,4799

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,6410

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,6917

KRW

South Korean won

1 452,74

ZAR

South African rand

13,6652

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

8,2728

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,6200

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

15 305,17

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,3625

PHP

Philippine peso

58,699

RUB

Russian rouble

43,6318

THB

Thai baht

42,287

BRL

Brazilian real

2,9927

MXN

Mexican peso

17,8303

INR

Indian rupee

84,5920

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
# C_2014017EN.01000702.xml

| 21.1.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 17/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.1.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 17/7

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.7089 — Ackermans & van Haaren/Aannemingsmaatschappij CFE)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2014/C 17/04

On 18 December 2013, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32013M7089. EUR-Lex is the online access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32013M7089. EUR-Lex is the online access to the European law.

---
II

Calendar No. 627

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 3839

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JUNE 7, 1994

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Governmental Affairs

SEPTEMBER 26 (legislative day, SEPTEMBER 12), 1994

Reported by Mr. GLENN, without amendment

AN ACT

To designate the United States Post Office building located

at 220 South 40th Avenue in Hattiesburg, Mississippi,

as the ‘‘Roy M. Wheat Post Office’’.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

4 The United States Post Office building located at 220

5 South 40th Avenue in Hattiesburg, Mississippi, shall be

6 known and designated as the ‘‘Roy M. Wheat Post

7 Office’’.
2

•HR 3839 RS

1 SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

2 Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document,

3 paper, or other record of the United States to the building

4 referred to in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference

5 to the Roy M. Wheat Post Office.

Passed the House of Representatives May 23, 1994.

Attest: DONNALD K. ANDERSON,

Clerk.

Calendar No. 627

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 3839

AN ACT

To designate the United States Post Office building

Office’’.burg, Mississippi, as the ‘‘Roy M. Wheat Postlocated at 220 South 40th Avenue in HattiesSEPTEMBER 26 (legislative day, SEPTEMBER 12), 1994

Reported without amendment
#### CITY OF MIAMI, a municipal corporation, Petitioner, v. Harry KENDEL et al., Respondents.

No. 71-1032.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Dec. 14, 1971.

PER CURIAM.

Certiorari denied.
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Lee R. ROBINSON.

No. 59602.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Sept. 19, 1977.

Rena M. Price, Orleans Indigent Defender Program, New Orleans, for defendant-appellant.

William J. Guste, Jr., Atty. Gen., Barbara Rutledge, Asst. Atty. Gen., Harry F. Con-nick, Dist. Atty., Louise S. Korns, Asst. Dist. Atty., for plaintiff-appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
# C_2015191EN.01000301.xml

| 9.6.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 191/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.6.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 191/3

---

Notice for the attention of the data subjects to whom the restrictive measures provided for in Council Regulation (EU) No 1352/2014 concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Yemen apply

(2015/C 191/02)

The attention of data subjects is drawn to the following information in accordance with Article 12 of Regulation (EC) No 45/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council (1):

1

The legal basis for this processing operation is Council Regulation (EU) No 1352/2014 (2).

2

The controller of this processing operation is the Council of the European Union represented by the Director-General of DG C (Foreign Affairs, Enlargement, Civil Protection) of the General Secretariat of the Council and the department entrusted with the processing operation is the Unit 1C of DG C that can be contacted at:

| Council of the European Union |
| --- |
| General Secretariat |
| DG C 1C |
| Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175 |
| 1048 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |
| E-mail: sanctions@consilium.europa.eu |

Council of the European Union

General Secretariat

DG C 1C

Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175

1048 Bruxelles/Brussel

BELGIQUE/BELGIË

E-mail: sanctions@consilium.europa.eu

The purpose of the processing operation is the establishment and updating of the list of persons subject to restrictive measures in accordance with Regulation (EU) No 1352/2014.

The data subjects are the natural persons who fulfil the listing criteria as laid down in that Regulation.

The personal data collected includes data necessary for the correct identification of the person concerned, the Statement of Reasons and any other data related thereto.

The personal data collected may be shared as necessary with the European External Action Service and the Commission.

Without prejudice to restrictions provided for in Article 20(1)(a) and (d) of Regulation (EC) No 45/2001, requests for access, as well as requests for rectification or objection will be answered in accordance with section 5 of Council Decision 2004/644/EC (3).

3

Personal data will be retained for 5 years from the moment the data subject has been removed from the list of persons subject to the asset freeze or the validity of the measure has expired, or for the duration of court proceedings in the event they had been started.

Data subjects may have recourse to the European Data Protection Supervisor in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 45/2001.

---

(1)  OJ L 8, 12.1.2001, p. 1.

1

(2)  OJ L 365, 19.12.2014, p. 60.

2

(3)  OJ L 296, 21.9.2004, p. 16.

3

---
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 06-7687

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus PETER PAUL, a/k/a Peter Paul Alexander, a/k/a Sluggie, a/k/a Peter P. Alexander; a/k/a Mark Eric Green; a/k/a Paul Eustance; a/k/a Derrick Anderson, a/k/a Mark Harris, Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, District Judge. (3:95-cr-00104-REP; 3:06-cv-00587-REP) Submitted: December 21, 2006 Decided: January 5, 2007 Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and KING, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Peter Paul, Appellant Pro Se. David John Novak, Office of the United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.- 2 - PER CURIAM: Peter Paul seeks to appeal the district court’s order treating his Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) motion as a successive 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000) motion, and dismissing it on that basis. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000); Reid v. Angelone , 369 F.3d 363, 369 (4th Cir. 2004). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that any assessment of the constitutional claims by the district court is debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by the district court is likewise debatable. Miller-El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee , 252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Paul has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis, deny a certificate of appealability, and dismiss the appeal. Additionally, we construe Paul’s notice of appeal and informal brief as an application to file a second or successive motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255. United States v. Winestock , 340 F.3d 200, 208 (4th Cir. 2003). In order to obtain authorization to- 3 - file a successive § 2255 motion, a prisoner must assert claims based on either: (1) a new rule of constitutional law, previously unavailable, made retroactive by the Supreme Court to cases on collateral review; or (2) newly discovered evidence, not previously discoverable by due diligence, that would be sufficient to establish by clear and convincing evidence that, but for constitutional error, no reasonable factfinder would have found the movant guilty of the offense. 28 U.S.C. §§ 2244(b)(2), 2255 (2000). Paul’s claims do not satisfy either of these criteria. Therefore, we deny authorization to file a successive § 2255 motion. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
# C_2016013EN.01000101.xml

| 15.1.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 13/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.1.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 13/1

---

Resolution of the European Economic and Social Committee on the current refugee crisis

(2016/C 013/01)

The EESC calls for immediate responsible and collective European action to address the massive arrival of refugees

The EESC calls for immediate responsible and collective European action to address the massive arrival of refugees

The current unacceptable situation of asylum seekers calls for a robust strategy at EU level in cooperation with Member States, social partners and other stakeholders to immediately address the multiple issues refugees are facing.

The ongoing humanitarian crisis endured by so many refugees is of great concern to our Committee as every day men, women and children are risking their lives to reach Europe. The scale of the current refugee crisis is unprecedented and a number of Member States are disproportionately affected by it. The challenging situation requires European Member States to show solidarity both towards people fleeing war, persecution, conflict and poverty and towards each other. Ensuring safe entry and welcoming them is the responsibility for all Member States and is part of our fundamental European values.

The EESC expresses its solidarity and profoundly regrets the loss of lives and the harsh conditions faced by the refugees on their way to safety. We call on civil society organisations, especially the ones represented in the EESC, to do whatever possible to help welcome and integrate refugees. The EESC praises the commitment of people working in local public administrations, non-governmental organisations and volunteers active in grassroots initiatives all around Europe providing assistance to people in need.

Today the European Union needs to act as a real Union and adopt a unified asylum law starting with a revision of the Dublin Regulation. It is time for governments and politicians to follow the lead of citizens, associations, as well as many municipalities that are mobilizing much more and faster than our governments and the EU Institutions. The EESC regrets that the Council was not yet able to take the necessary decision in this pressing humanitarian crisis. Therefore the EESC urges the European Council to hold an extraordinary summit before the end of the month in order to reach an agreement on concreate measures and actions, including a fair quota scheme.

The EESC is very concerned about the current undermining of the Schengen agreement and of free movement, as it is one of the fundamental achievements benefitting EU citizens.

It is crucial to develop immediate measures also to address the root causes of the current refugee flows. The EU needs to work with countries of origin and transit on these issues and the EESC welcomes the human right-based approach foreseen by the Commission for this cooperation. Lastly, the EESC underlines the necessity of including civil society in the dialogue with third countries.

---
Exhibit 10.1

 

Description of the $250 million secured Revolving Credit Agreement Extension

 

November 23, 2016

 

Pursuant to the terms of the $250 million secured Revolving Credit Agreement, dated as of November 23, 2015, between Consumers Energy Company and The Bank of Nova Scotia, the parties have all agreed, effective November 23, 2016, to extend the Termination Date (as defined therein) for a period of one year to November 23, 2018.
# C_2015370EN.01000301.xml

| 7.11.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 370/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.11.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 370/3

---

Information communicated by Member States regarding closure of fisheries

(2015/C 370/03)

In accordance with Article 35(3) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1224/2009 of 20 November 2009 establishing a Community control system for ensuring compliance with the rules of the common fisheries policy (1), a decision has been taken to close the fishery as set down in the following table:

1

| Date and time of closure | 5.10.2015 |
| --- | --- |
| Duration | 5.10.2015-31.12.2015 |
| Member State | Sweden |
| Stock or Group of stocks | COD/03AS. |
| Species | Cod (Gadus morhua) |
| Zone | Kattegat |
| Type(s) of fishing vessels | — |
| Reference number | 54/TQ104 |

Date and time of closure

5.10.2015

Duration

5.10.2015-31.12.2015

Member State

Sweden

Stock or Group of stocks

COD/03AS.

Species

Cod (Gadus morhua)

Gadus morhua

Zone

Kattegat

Type(s) of fishing vessels

—

Reference number

54/TQ104

---

(1)  OJ L 343, 22.12.2009, p. 1.

1

---
SHANG HIDE CONSULTANTS, LTD.





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES -OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Shang Hide Consultants, Ltd. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Marty Weigel the Principal Executive and Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 (including subsections (a) (b) and (c) thereof), as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








Date: November 10, 2010











/s/ Marty Weigel


Marty Weigel


Principal Executive and Financial Officer
[Cite as Kuebler v. Columbus Dept. of Public Safety , 2021-Ohio-647.]

{¶1} On December 30, 2020, a special master issued a report and recommendation (R&R) in this public-records case. The special master recommends denying requester’s claim for production of withheld portions o f requested records. The special master further recommends that court costs be assessed to respondent because respondent did not disclose non-exempt headers, signatu re blocks, and disclaimers until after litigation had commenced. {¶2} Neither party has filed timely written objections to the R&R. Pursuant to R.C. 2743.75(F)(2), if neither party timely objects to a specia l master’s report and recommendation, this court is required to “promptly issue a fin al order adopting the report and recommendation, unless it determines that there is a n error of law or other defect evident on the face of the report and recommendation.” {¶3} The court determines that there is no error of law or other def ect evident on the face of the R&R of December 30, 2020. The court therefore adopts the special master’s R&R. Judgment is rendered in favor of respondent. Co urt costs are assessed against KENNETH J. KUEBLER

Requester

v.

COLUMBUS DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY

Respondent Case No. 2020-00525PQ

Judge Patrick E. Sheeran

JUDGMENT ENTRYCase No. 2020-00525PQ -2- ENTRY

respondent in accordance with the special master’s recommendati on. The clerk shall serve upon all parties notice of this judgment and its date of entry upon the journal.

PATRICK E. SHEERAN Jud g e

Filed February 25, 2021 Sent to S.C. Reporter 3/8/21
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 167 (Tuesday, August 28, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Page 43950]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-18538]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

[Disaster Declaration # 15622 and # 15623; California Disaster Number 
CA-00288]


Presidential Declaration Amendment of a Major Disaster for the 
State of California

AGENCY: U.S. Small Business Administration.

ACTION: Amendment 1.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This is an amendment of the Presidential declaration of a 
major disaster for the State of California (FEMA-4382-DR), dated 08/04/
2018.
    Incident: Wildfires and High Winds.
    Incident Period: 07/23/2018 and continuing.

DATES: Issued on 08/17/2018.
    Physical Loan Application Deadline Date: 10/03/2018.
    Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date: 05/06/2019.

ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business 
Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport 
Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A. Escobar, Office of Disaster 
Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street SW, 
Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416, (202) 205-6734.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The notice of the President's major disaster 
declaration for the State of California, dated 08/04/2018, is hereby 
amended to include the following areas as adversely affected by the 
disaster:
Primary Counties (Physical Damage and Economic Injury Loans): Lake
Contiguous Counties (Economic Injury Loans Only):
California: Colusa, Glenn, Mendocino, Napa, Sonoma, Yolo.
    All other information in the original declaration remains 
unchanged.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number 59008)

James Rivera,
Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance.
[FR Doc. 2018-18538 Filed 8-27-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
<PAGE>

          AMENDMENT TO THE 1995 NONEMPLOYEE DIRECTORS STOCK OPTION PLAN

The 1995 Nonemployee Directors Stock Option Plan (the "Plan") is amended by
deleting Paragraphs 3, 4 and 5 and inserting in lieu thereof the following
paragraphs:

         3.       ELIGIBLE DIRECTORS. Options shall be granted under this Plan
only to a person who is not, on the date of election to the Board, also an
employee of the Company or any subsidiary (a "Non-Employee Director") and who is
either: (a) first elected to the Board during the portion of the term of the
Plan preceding May 26, 2000; or (b) is serving on the Board on May 26, 2000. A
person who satisfies the description set forth in both subparagraph (a) and (b)
of this paragraph 3 shall be granted options under both such subparagraphs.

         4.       STOCK. The stock subject to the Options shall be authorized
but unissued shares of the Common Stock of the Company, no par value (the
"Common Stock"), or shares of Common Stock reacquired by the Company, including
shares purchased in the open market. The aggregate number of shares of Common
Stock which may be issued pursuant to this Plan is 60,000, subject to adjustment
as provided in paragraph 15. In the event any Option granted under the Plan
shall expire or terminate for any reason without having been exercised in full
or shall cease for any reason to be exercisable in whole or in part, the
unpurchased shares subject thereto, shall again be available for grants of
Options under the Plan. The shares issued upon exercise of Options granted under
the Plan may be authorized and unissued shares or shares held by the Company in
its treasury, or both.

         5.       GRANTING OF OPTIONS. Each Non-Employee Director first
elected to the Board during the portion of the term of this Plan preceding
May 26, 2000, automatically and without the exercise of any discretion on the
part of any person, shall receive as of the date of such election, a single
Option exercisable for 10,000 shares of Common Stock. Each Non-Employee
Director who is serving on the Board on May 26, 2000, automatically and
without the exercise of any discretion on the part of any person, shall
receive as of May 26, 2000, a single option exercisable for 10,000 shares of
Common Stock.

         Except as specifically provided to the contrary in this Amendment, the
Plan shall continue in full force and effect.

         ADOPTED by the Board of Directors effective as of May 26, 2000.