alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.1

                           CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL
                          EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT BY
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the Annual Report of BMB Munai, Inc., on Form 10-KSB
for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned,
Alexandre Agaian, Principal Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13
                  (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and result of
                  operations of the Company.



Date: June 28, 2004                                  /s/ Alexandre Agaian
                                                    ----------------------------
                                                     Alexandre Agaian,
                                                     Principal Executive Officer
----

Removal from the register of Joined Cases C-451/02 and C-452/02 (1)

(2004/C 300/71)

By order of 27 July 2004 the President of the Court of Justice of the European Communities has ordered the removal from the register of Joined Cases C-451/02 and C-452/02 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesfinanzhof): Hauptzollamt Bremen v Joh. C. Henschen GmbH & Co. KG (C-451/02) and ITG GmbH Internationale Spedition (C-452/02).

----

(1)OJ C 55 du 8.3.2003.

----
EXHIBIT  32.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of China Liaoning Dingxu Ecological Agriculture Development, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2012 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Chin Yung Kong, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:





(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.







Date: August 10, 2012

/s/ Chin Yung KongChin Yung KongChief Financial Officer
Y ol o- S ol an o A Q MD

Rev ised January

13 , 2 010 Reg . I I , Rule 2.12, Pag e1

RU LE 2 .1 2 SP EC IF IC CO NT AM IN AN TS Adopted J anuar

y 21, 1972 Revised J anuar

y 13, 2010 IN DE X 100 GENERAL 10 1 PURPOS E 102 APPL I CABI L I TY 110 EXEMPTI ON - TRAN SI TI ON 200 DEF INITIONS 201 COMBUSTI ON CONTAMI NANTS 300 STANDARDS 301 REQUI REMENT 400 MONITORING 401 COMPL IANCE DETERMI NATI ON 402 TEST METHODSY ol o- S ol an o A Q MD

Rev ised January

13 , 2 010 Reg . I I , Rule 2.12, Pag e2 100 GENERAL 101 P URP OSE: The purpose of this rule is to protect the am b i en t air qua lity by es t ab lishing par

ticulate matter

combustion contaminants and sulfur c ompound e mis sio n s tand ard s. 102 AP P LICABILIT Y: This rule applies to any source operation which emits, or may e mit su lf ur g a se ou s e mis sio ns and

pa rt ic ulate matte r c omb us tio n c ontamin ants 110 EX EM P TIO NS: The provisio n s o f t his rule shall not apply duringthe start of a

n operation or chang e in ene rgy source , duri n g t h e t i me nec essar y to bringthe c omb us tio n p ro c e ss u

p to op e ratin gle ve l. 200 DEF INITIONS 201 COMBUSTION CONTAMINANTS: Particulate matter dischar g ed into the atmosphere from the bur

ning of any kind of materia l containingcar bon in a fre e or combined state. 300 STANDARD 301 RE Q UI RE ME NT : A p e r so n s ha ll n ot d isc ha

rg e int o th e atmo sp he re fr om a ny sin g le so ur c e of e mis sio n what so ever, a

ny on e or mor e of the fo llo wi ngc ontamin ants , in any state or c ombination th er eo f, i n excess of the followingconce ntrations at the point of discharg e: 2 a . Sul f

ur c o mp o un d s c a lc u late d a s s u lf ur d io xid e ( SO ) 0

. 2%, by volume at standar d conditions. b. Combust i o n Contaminants: 0.31 gra ins per cubic foot of g as 2 calc ulated to 12 per cent of car bon diox ide (CO ) a t standard c on dit ion s. 400 MONITORING 401 COMP LIANCE DETERMINATION: In m easu ri ng th e com bu st io n c on ta min a nts from incinerators used to dispose of combustible ref use by burning , t h e c arbon diox ide (CO2) pr oduced by combust i o n o f any

liquid or ga seous fue ls shall be excluded from the c alculation to 12 per cent of car bon diox ide (CO2). 402 TEST M ETHO DS: 40 2. 1 Th e e xha

us t sta c k g a s ve loc ity sh a ll b e de te rm ine d in a c c or da nc e wi th E PA or CARB Te st Method 2.Y ol o- S ol an o A Q MD

Rev ised January

13 , 2 010 Reg . I I , Rule 2.12, Pag e3 4 0 2

. 2 T h e e xh a

u s t s ta c k g a s mo is tu

r e c o n te n t s h a ll b e d e te r

mi n e d in a c c o r d an ce with EPA or CARB Test Method 4. 40 2. 3 De te rm inatio n o f p art ic ulate ma tte r e mis si on s sh a ll b e c on du c te d in acc ordanc e with EPA or CARB Te st Method 5. 402.4 Sulfur compound emissions sha ll be deter mined in acc ordanc e with EPA or CARB Test Method 8.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM MTR GAMING
GROUP, INC. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AS OF JUNE 30, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-01-2000             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-2000             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000             JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                       9,677,000               9,677,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                2,703,000               2,703,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                  (48,000)                (48,000)
<INVENTORY>                                          0                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            16,816,000              13,161,000
<PP&E>                                      78,756,000              78,756,000
<DEPRECIATION>                            (16,158,000)            (16,158,000)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              83,367,000              83,307,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       19,187,000              19,187,000
<BONDS>                                     70,955,000              26,955,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                    36,830,000              36,830,000
<OTHER-SE>                                     395,000                 395,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                83,367,000              83,367,000
<SALES>                                     42,688,000              78,944,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            42,688,000              78,944,000
<CGS>                                       26,297,000              49,071,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               35,237,000              65,467,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0                       0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             767,000               1,587,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              6,751,000              17,076,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                 2,434,000               4,341,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          4,317,000               7,685,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                 4,317,000               7,605,000
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.20                    0.36
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.17                    0.30


</TABLE>
----

COUNCIL DECISION

of 29 November 2004

appointing a member of the Advisory Committee of the Euratom Supply Agency

(2004/C 305/01)

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Atomic Energy Community, and in particular the second and third paragraphs of Article 54 thereof,

Having regard to Article X of the Statutes of the Euratom Supply Agency (1), as last amended by Decision 95/1/EC, Euratom, ECSC of 1 January 1995 (2),

Having regard to the Council Decision of 22 September 2003 appointing the members of the Advisory Committee of the Euratom Supply Agency (3),

Having regard to the opinion of the Commission,

Whereas:

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Sole Article

Mr Nicolas KATSAROS is hereby appointed a member of the Advisory Committee of the Euratom Supply Agency for the remainder of the Committee's term of office, ending on 28 March 2005.

Done at Brussels, 29 November 2004.

For the Council

The President

L.J. BRINKHORST

----

(1)OJ 27, 6.12.1958, p. 534/58.

(2)OJ L 1, 1.1.1995, p. 1.

(3)OJ C 232, 27.9.2003, p. 1.

----
1

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

PUBLIC MEETING ON ENERGY CONSERVATION PROGRAM FOR CONSUMER 

PRODUCTS: ENERGY CONSERVATION STANDARDS FOR BATTERY 

CHARGERS AND EXTERNAL POWER SUPPLIES

U.S. Department of Energy

1000 Independence Avenue, SW

Washington DC, 20585

Wednesday, May 2, 2012

9 a.m. – 5 p.m., Room 8E-089

Purpose

During this meeting the Department of Energy (DOE) will present the notice of proposed 

rulemaking (NOPR) on energy conservation standards for battery chargers and external 

power supplies (EPSs) and will seek input from interested parties on the methodologies, 

assumptions, data sources, and proposed standard levels presented in the NOPR.

Agenda

9:00 – 9:05 am Welcome, Introductions, Ground Rules

Doug Brookman

9:05 – 9:15 am Opening Remarks, Background, Regulatory History

Victor Petrolati

9:15 – 9:45 am Opening Comments from Participants

Doug Brookman

9:45 – 10:30 am Market Assessment Including Product Definitions and 

Scope

Brian Booher

10:30 – 10:45 am Break

10:45 – 11:45 am Technology Assessment, Screening and Engineering 

Analyses

Peter Protopappas and Chris Skahan

11:45 am – 12:15 pm Energy Use and Markups Analyses

Daniel Lauf

12:15 – 1:15 pm Lunch

1:15 – 2:15 pm Life Cycle Cost, Shipments, National Impact, Regulatory 

Impact, and Manufacturer Impact Analyses

Pamela Costello, Daniel Lauf, and Hayden Cook
2

2:15 – 2:30 pm Utility Impact, Employment Impact, and Environmental 

Impact Analyses

Sanaee Iyama

2:30 – 2:45 pm Break

2:45 – 4:15 pm Summary of Results and Proposed Standards

Ari Reeves

4:15 – 4:30 pm Labeling

Ari Reeves

4:30 – 4:55 pm Closing Comments from Participants

Doug Brookman

4:55 – 5:00 pm Closing Remarks

Victor Petrolati
# C_2014453EN.01001201.xml

| 17.12.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 453/12 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.12.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 453/12

---

Opinion of the Advisory Committee on restrictive agreements and dominant position given at its meeting of 25 November 2013 regarding a draft decision relating to Case AT.39633(2) — Shrimps

Rapporteur: Ireland

(2014/C 453/06)

| 1. | The Advisory Committee agrees with the Commission on the basic amount of the fines. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The Advisory Committee agrees with the Commission on the basic amount of the fines.

| 2. | The Advisory Committee agrees with the Commission on the reduction of the basic amount for two undertakings due to mitigating circumstances. |
| --- | --- |

2.

The Advisory Committee agrees with the Commission on the reduction of the basic amount for two undertakings due to mitigating circumstances.

| 3. | The Advisory Committee agrees with the Commission on the further reduction of the basic amounts for all undertakings on the basis of Point 37 of the 2006 Commission Guidelines on the method of setting fines. |
| --- | --- |

3.

The Advisory Committee agrees with the Commission on the further reduction of the basic amounts for all undertakings on the basis of Point 37 of the 2006 Commission Guidelines on the method of setting fines.

| 4. | The Advisory Committee agrees with the Commission on the reduction of the fine for one undertaking based on the 2006 Commission Notice on Immunity from fines and reduction of fines in cartel cases. |
| --- | --- |

4.

The Advisory Committee agrees with the Commission on the reduction of the fine for one undertaking based on the 2006 Commission Notice on Immunity from fines and reduction of fines in cartel cases.

| 5. | The Advisory Committee agrees with the Commission on the rejection of the claim for inability to pay of one undertaking on the basis of Point 35 of the Commission Guidelines on the method of setting fines. |
| --- | --- |

5.

The Advisory Committee agrees with the Commission on the rejection of the claim for inability to pay of one undertaking on the basis of Point 35 of the Commission Guidelines on the method of setting fines.

| 6. | The Advisory Committee agrees with the Commission on the final amounts of the fines. |
| --- | --- |

6.

The Advisory Committee agrees with the Commission on the final amounts of the fines.

| 7. | The Advisory Committee recommends the publication of its opinion in the Official Journal of the European Union. |
| --- | --- |

7.

The Advisory Committee recommends the publication of its opinion in the Official Journal of the European Union.

Official Journal of the European Union

---
Exhibit 10.12


 


Barberry Corp.


 


Effective as of February 4, 2014


 


Cadus Corporation


767 Fifth Avenue


New York, New York 10153


 


		Re:	Capital Contributions in Respect of Compensation Paid
to Bayswater Brokerage Florida LLC



 


Gentlemen:


 


The undersigned, Barberry
Corp., is controlled by Carl Icahn and holds 1,899,622 shares of the common stock of Cadus Corporation (“Cadus”). Bayswater
Brokerage Florida LLC (“Bayswater”), also an entity controlled by Mr. Icahn, is providing brokerage services to Cadus
or its subsidiaries on a non-exclusive basis. This is to confirm our agreement that, to the extent Bayswater receives any compensation
for such brokerage services provided to Cadus, the undersigned will promptly make capital contributions to Cadus for the full amount
of any such compensation received by Bayswater. The undersigned understands and agrees that it will not be issued stock of Cadus
Corporation or any other consideration in respect of such capital contributions.


 


Very truly yours,


 


	 	BARBERRY CORP.
	 	 	 
	 	By:   	/s/ Keith Cozza
	 	 	Name: Keith Cozza
	 	 	Title: Secretary; Treasurer




 


ACKNOWLEDGED AND AGREED:


 


	CADUS CORPORATION	 
	 	 	 
	By:  	/s/ David Blitz	 
	 	Name: David Blitz	 
	 	Title: President
EXHIBIT 21.1

Antigua Cement, Ltd.
Antigua Development and Construction, Ltd.
Antigua Heavy Constructors, Ltd.
Antigua Masonry Products, Ltd.
Bahamas Construction and Development, Ltd.
Bouwbedrijf Boven Winden, N.V.
Bouwbedrijf Boven Winden (Saba), N.V.
Bouwbedrijf Boven Winden (St. Eustatius), N.V.
Caribbean Cement Carriers, Ltd.
Caribbean Construction and Development, Ltd.
Caribbean Heavy Construction, Ltd.
Caribbean Masonry Products, Ltd.
Cramer Construction, N.V.
Devcon Caribbean Purchasing Corp.
Devcon Crown Bay II Corp.
Devcon Crown Bay Corp.
Devcon Masonry Products (BVI), Ltd.
Marco, Inc.
M21 Industries, Inc.
Proar Construction Materials Company, N.V.
Puerto Rico Crushing Company, Inc.
Seaward Shipping & Dredging Co., Ltd.
Societe des Carriers de Grand Case, S.A.R.L.
V.I. Cement and Building Products, Inc.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion

should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited

circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

September 6, 2007

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-50237

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

ROBERTO PENA-ROJAS, also known as Benjamin Arias-Gutierrez

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. 3:06-CR-1918-1

Before DeMOSS, DENNIS, and OWEN, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Roberto Pena-Rojas raises

arguments that are foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S.

224, 235 (1998), which held that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) is a penalty provision and

not a separate criminal offense. See United States v. Pineda-Arrellano, 492 F.3d

624, 625 (5th Cir. 2007). The Government's motion for summary affirmance is

GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 98-41193

Summary Calendar

 

ROGERS LEE JACKSON,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

JOANNE B. BARNHART, 

COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY,

Defendant-Appellee.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Texas

USDC No. 6:95-CV-660

--------------------

March 14, 2002

ON REMAND FROM THE SUPREME COURT

OF THE UNITED STATES

Before JOLLY, JONES and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

In Jackson v. Massanari, 122 S. Ct. 25 (2001), the Supreme

Court granted Rogers Lee Jackson’s petition for writ of

certiorari, vacated the judgment, and remanded the case to this

court for further consideration in light of the position asserted

by the Solicitor General in his brief for the acting Commissioner

of Social Security (“Commissioner”). The issue before the Court

was whether Jackson’s failure to identify his hearing loss
No. 98-41193

-2-

impairment in proceedings before the administrative law judge

(ALJ) precluded him from alleging that impairment on judicial

review of the ALJ’s adverse decision.

The Solicitor General conceded, however, that Jackson did

raise a hearing loss claim before the ALJ; therefore, he argued

that the case should be remanded to the Commissioner to more

fully develop the record on this issue. “When a claimant is

unrepresented by counsel, the ALJ has a duty scrupulously and

conscientiously [to] probe into, inquire of, and explore for all

the relevant facts.” Bowling v. Shalala, 36 F.3d 431, 437 (5th

Cir. 1994) (internal quotation and citation omitted). We

therefore adopt the position of the Solicitor General and hold

that Jackson did raise his hearing loss claim before the ALJ and

that the ALJ should have more fully developed the record on this

issue. 

We therefore VACATE the judgment of the district court and

REMAND the case to the district court, with instructions to

vacate the Commissioner’s decision and to remand the case to the

Commissioner for further proceedings on only the issue whether

Jackson is entitled to Supplemental Security Income benefits due

to an alleged hearing loss. The Supreme Court’s remand left

untouched our holdings on the other issues Jackson raised on

appeal.

VACATED AND REMANDED.
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
(Form S-8 No. 33-55547, 33-55657, 333-42019 and 333-77505) of Coram Healthcare
Corporation of our report dated April 9, 2004,  with respect to the consolidated
financial statements and schedule of Coram Healthcare Corporation included in
this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2003.

We also consent to the incorporation by reference in Amendment No. 3 to the
Registration Statements (Form S-3 No. 33-59661 and 33-60959) and Amendment No. 1
to the Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-12955) and related prospectuses
of Coram Healthcare Corporation for the registration of 3,526,325, 2,686,656 and
184,444 shares, respectively, of its common stock, of our report dated April 9,
2004, with respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedule of
Coram Healthcare Corporation included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the
year ended December 31, 2003.


                                                           /s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP
                                                           ---------------------
                                                               ERNST & YOUNG LLP


Denver, Colorado
April 9, 2004
#### Jimmie N. HOWELL and Alice G. Howell, Appellants, v. CAROLINA FREIGHT CARRIERS, INC., Frazeur Produce Company and Albert Eugene Best, Appellees.

No. 70-717.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Jan. 4, 1971.

Appeal dismissed.
SCWC

- 1 9

- 0000 47 6

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI ʻ I

STATE OF HAWAI ʻ I , Petitioner and Respondent / Plaintiff

- Appell ant,

vs.

LEAH SKAPINOK, Respondent and Petitioner /Defendant

- Appellee

.

CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS (CAAP

- 1 9

- 0000 476 ; C ASE NO. 1DTA

- 1 9

- 0 1048 )

ORDER ACCEPT ING APPLICATION S FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI (By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, and Wilson, J J. , and Circuit J udge Won g , assigned by reason of vacancy )

Petitioner and Respondent /P laintiff

- Appellant ’ s Application for Writ of Certiorari, filed on August 2 0 , 2020,

and Respondent and Petitioner/Defendant

- Appellee’s Application for Writ of Certiorari, filed on August 24, 2020, are hereby accepted and will be scheduled for oral argument. The parties will be notified by the appellate clerk regarding scheduling

. DATED: Honolulu, Hawai ʻ i, October 1, 2020

. /s/ Mark E. Recktenwald
/s/ Paula A. Nakayama

/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna

/s/ Michael D. Wilson

/s/ Paul B.K. Wong Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCWC-19-0000476 01-OCT-2020 11:03 AM
Exhibit
20.3

MONTHLY SERVICER'S CERTIFICATE

RETAILERS NATIONAL BANK

TARGET CREDIT CARD MASTER TRUST
SERIES 1998-1

The undersigned, a duly authorized representative of Retailers National Bank, as Servicer ("RNB") pursuant to the Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of September 13, 1995 (as may be
amended, from time to time, the "Agreement") as supplemented by the Series 1998-1 Supplement (as amended and supplemented, the "Series Supplement"), among RNB, Target Receivables Corporation
and Wells Fargo Bank Minnesota, National Association, does hereby certify as follows:



Class
A            4.917



Class
A            0.000



Class
A            4.917



RETAILERS NATIONAL BANK,as servicerBy:    /s/ Terrence J. ScullyName: Terrence J. ScullyTitle:  Secretary