alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
* District Judge of the Western District of Louisiana,

sitting by designation.

** Pursuant to 5 TH C IRCUIT R ULE 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IRCUIT RULE 47.5.4. 1 United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

## FILED November 3, 2004 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

______________________ No. 03-11019

______________________ MICHAEL JON PIERCE, JR., Plaintiff - Appellant,

vs. UNITED RENTALS, INC., UNITED RENTALS OCCUPATIONAL INJURY BENEFIT PLAN and EMPLOYERS HEALTH INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendants - Appellees.

______________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:01-CV-0995-K

______________________ Before WIENER and PRADO, Circuit Judges, and LITTLE, * District Judge. PER CURIAM: ** The court has considered the parties’ positions in light of oral argument, the briefs, and pertinent portions of the record. Having done so, the court finds no reversible error of fact or2

law and AFFIRMS for essentially the reasons stated by the district court. See Pierce v. United Rentals, Inc. , No. 3:01-CV0995-K, 2003 WL 22289882 (N.D. Tex. Aug. 28, 2003). AFFIRMED.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                               1,085
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                            0
<ALLOWANCES>                                             0
<INVENTORY>                                              0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     1,085
<PP&E>                                                   0
<DEPRECIATION>                                           0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       1,085
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                    0
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                         2,195,000
<OTHER-SE>                                         294,530
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         1,085
<SALES>                                                  0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                         0
<CGS>                                                    0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                            0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    82,450
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                       0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                          0
<INCOME-TAX>                                             0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                (73,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                       (59,168)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        (0.13)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        (0.04)
        


</TABLE>
259 La. 766

#### STATE of Louisiana ex rel. Walter LaFLEUR v. C. Murray HENDERSON, Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary, et al.

No. 51770.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Sept. 30, 1971.

In re: Walter LaFleur applying for writs of certiorari, prohibition, mandamus and habeas corpus.

Application denied. The showing made does not warrant the exercise of either our original or supervisory jurisdiction.

BARHAM, J.,

is of the opinion that the application shows on its face a right to relief. He complains of lack of counsel at the time he entered two pleas of guilty and under which he received concurrent 3 year sentences. The minutes do not show that counsel was afforded relator or waived by him. Relator has been denied a transcript of the evidentiary hearing below. No showing is made in the record before us that relator had counsel or waived counsel. We should review the evidentiary hearing evidence or grant the relief prayed for. I respectfully dissent from the majority disposition of the application. See dissents in State ex rel. Griffin, Walker and Williams v. Henderson, Nos. 51,757, 51,735 and 51,-741 our docket, 259 La. 731, 712, 722, 252 So.2d 445, 438, 442.
<PAGE>
                                                         Exhibit 23

                    INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT


     We consent to the use in this Registration Statement of Sun Life
Assurance Company of Canada (U.S.) on Form S-2 of our report dated March 22,
2000 accompanying the financial statements of Sun Life Assurance Company of
Canada (U.S.), appearing in the Prospectus for MFS Regatta Flex Four Variable
and Fixed Annuity and in the Prospectus for Futurity Select Four Variable and
Fixed Annuity, which are part of such Registration Statement, and to the
incorporation by reference of our report dated February 10, 2000 appearing in
the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Sun Life Assurance Company of Canada (U.S.)
for the year ended December 31, 1999, which includes explanatory paragraphs
relating to the use of statutory accounting practices which differ from
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

We also consent to the references to us under the heading "Accountants" in
such Prospectuses.



DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

Boston, Massachusetts
September 22, 2000
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 167 (Tuesday, August 28, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Page 43950]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-18539]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

[Disaster Declaration #15661 and #15662; IOWA Disaster Number IA-00083]


Presidential Declaration of a Major Disaster for Public 
Assistance Only for the State of Iowa

AGENCY: U.S. Small Business Administration.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This is a Notice of the Presidential declaration of a major 
disaster for Public Assistance Only for the State of Iowa (FEMA-4386-
DR), dated 08/20/2018.
    Incident: Severe Storms, Tornadoes, Straight-line Winds, and 
Flooding.
    Incident Period: 06/06/2018 through 07/02/2018.

DATES: Issued on 08/20/2018.
    Physical Loan Application Deadline Date: 10/19/2018.
    Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date: 05/20/2019.

ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business 
Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport 
Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A. Escobar, Office of Disaster 
Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street SW, 
Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416, (202) 205-6734.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that as a result of 
the President's major disaster declaration on 08/20/2018, Private Non-
Profit organizations that provide essential services of a governmental 
nature may file disaster loan applications at the address listed above 
or other locally announced locations.
    The following areas have been determined to be adversely affected 
by the disaster:

Primary Counties: Adair, Buchanan, Buena Vista, Cerro Gordo, Cherokee, 
Chickasaw, Clay, Dallas, Delaware, Dickinson, Emmet, Floyd, Hamilton, 
Hancock, Howard, Humboldt, Kossuth, Lyon, O'Brien, Osceola, Palo Alto, 
Pocahontas, Polk, Sioux, Story, Warren, Webster, Winnebago, Winneshiek, 
Wright.

    The Interest Rates are:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                Percent
------------------------------------------------------------------------
For Physical Damage:
  Non-Profit Organizations with Credit Available Elsewhere...      2.500
  Non-Profit Organizations without Credit Available Elsewhere      2.500
For Economic Injury:
  Non-Profit Organizations without Credit Available Elsewhere      2.500
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The number assigned to this disaster for physical damage is 156616 
and for economic injury is 156620.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number 59008)

Rafaela Monchek,
Acting Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance.
[FR Doc. 2018-18539 Filed 8-27-18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
### BEFOR E TH E DEPARTMEN TO F TRANSPORTATIO N

WASHINGTON , D.C .

Agreement s Adopte d b yth e Traffi c Conference s o f th e Internationa l Ai r Transpor t Associatio n OST-2011 - 00g, 9

APPLICATIO N FO R APPROVA L O F AGREEMENT S

BYTH E INTERNATIONA L AI R TRANSPOR TASSOCIATIO N lAT A AGREEMEN

T APPROVE

D & IMMUNIZE

D DOCKETOST-^*^^
- A/i^P , ACTiONDAT E^•^-^'^'^ i "^^ l \ Thi s approva

l an dgran t o f antitrus t immunit y i s subject, wher

e applicable , to condition s previousl

y imposed . Thi s actio n i s effectiv

e afte r 7 day s unles s apetition i s filedunde r 1 4 CF R385.3 0 o

r arevie w i s undertake

n o n tfie Department' s ow

n motion , i n vie w o f th e agreement' s n*nc*ntT«versia l natur e an dthe availabilit

y o f th e abov^rocedure , the^-jj^ y M^^J n 1 4 CF R303.42 i s waived . 

### 15Febnjary201 1 Communication s wit h respec t t o thi s documen t shoul d b e sen t t o Dougla s E . Lavi n Regiona l Vic e Presiden t - Nort h Americ a Internationa l Ai rTranspor t Associatio n 177 6 K.St.N.W . #12 * Floo r Washingto n D C 2000 6
# C_2015098EN.01000901.xml

| 25.3.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 98/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.3.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 98/9

---

Commission notice pursuant to Article 16(4) of Regulation (EC) No 1008/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council on common rules for the operation of air services in the Community

Public service obligations in respect of scheduled air services

(2015/C 98/09)

| Member State | France |
| --- | --- |
| Routes concerned | Ajaccio – Paris (Orly)
  Ajaccio – Marseille
  Ajaccio – Nice
  Figari – Paris (Orly)
  Figari – Marseille
  Figari – Nice |
| Date of entry into force of the public service obligations | 25 March 2016 |
| Address from which the text and any relevant information and/or documentation relating to the public service obligation can be obtained | Decision No 15/005 AC of the Corsican Assembly to amend the public service obligations on scheduled air services between Paris (Orly), Marseille and Nice, on the one hand, and Ajaccio, Bastia, Calvi and Figari on the other, and the adoption of the principle of the public service delegation for the operation of air services in Corsica.
  http://www.corse.fr/Seance-publique-des-5-et-6-fevrier-2015_a4754.html





  Office des Transports de la Corse |
| M. le Directeur |
| 19 avenue Georges-Pompidou |
| Quartier Saint-Joseph |
| BP 501 |
| 20189 Ajaccio Cedex 2 |
| FRANCE |
| E-mail: francis.pian@otc-corse.fr |
| Tel. +33 495237130 |
| Fax +33 495201631 |

Member State

France

Routes concerned

Ajaccio – Paris (Orly)

Ajaccio – Marseille

Ajaccio – Nice

Figari – Paris (Orly)

Figari – Marseille

Figari – Nice

Date of entry into force of the public service obligations

25 March 2016

Address from which the text and any relevant information and/or documentation relating to the public service obligation can be obtained

Decision No 15/005 AC of the Corsican Assembly to amend the public service obligations on scheduled air services between Paris (Orly), Marseille and Nice, on the one hand, and Ajaccio, Bastia, Calvi and Figari on the other, and the adoption of the principle of the public service delegation for the operation of air services in Corsica.

http://www.corse.fr/Seance-publique-des-5-et-6-fevrier-2015_a4754.html

Office des Transports de la Corse

M. le Directeur

19 avenue Georges-Pompidou

Quartier Saint-Joseph

BP 501

20189 Ajaccio Cedex 2

FRANCE

E-mail: francis.pian@otc-corse.fr

Tel. +33 495237130

Fax +33 495201631

---
\<*71*IH

ELECTRONIC RECORD

COA# 02-14-00180-CR OFFENSE: 22.021

Michael Wade Riddle v. The State

STYLE: ofTexas COUNTY: Wichita

COA DISPOSITION: AFFIRM TRIAL COURT: 89th District Court

DATE: 10/23/2014 Publish: NO TC CASE #: 41,428-C

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

Michael Wade Riddle v. The State of

STYLE: Texas CCA#: IU11-H

APP£u-AA/r'>s Petition

FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW IN CCA IS:

DATE: 0*//<f/j20/r

JUDGE: f^Uoutp^.

CCA Disposition:

DATE:

JUDGE:

SIGNED:

PUBLISH:

REHEARING IN CCA IS:

JUDGE:

PC:

DNP:

MOTION FOR

ELECTRONIC RECORD
SCWC-16-0000793

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAII

________________________________________________________________

STATE OF HAWAII, Respondent/Plaintiff-Appellee,

vs.

KIMBERLY J. UDO, Petitioner/Defendant-Appellant.

________________________________________________________________

CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS

(CAAP-16-0000793; CR. NO. 14-1-1199)

ORDER ACCEPTING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI

(By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, Pollack, and Wilson, JJ.)

Petitioner/Defendant-Appellant Kimberly J. Udo’s 

application for writ of certiorari filed on October 4, 2018, is 

hereby accepted and will be scheduled for oral argument. The 

parties will be notified by the appellate clerk regarding 

scheduling.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawaii, December 4, 2018.

/s/ Mark E. Recktenwald

/s/ Paula A. Nakayama

/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna 

/s/ Richard W. Pollack

/s/ Michael D. Wilson

Electronically Filed

Supreme Court

SCWC-16-0000793

04-DEC-2018

08:44 AM
JOHN M. MURRAY , Appellant,

v. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS , Appellee.

__________________ _ ____________/ IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF A PPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHE ARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED.
CASE NO. 1D 16

- 3166

Opinion filed June 6, 2017. An ap peal from the Circuit Court for Leon County. John C. Cooper , Judge. John M. Murray, pro se , Appellant. Kenneth S. Steely, General Counsel, Sheron Wells and Barbara Debelius, Assistant General Counsels, Department of Corrections , Tallahassee, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM. Appellant seeks review of the denial of a petition for writ of mandamus that sought a recommendation from the Florida Dep artment of Corrections (“the Department”) to the Office of Executive Clemency (“OEC”) for commutation of his life sentence. Appellant sought reimbursement of personal costs and requested that the OEC be notified that appellant was convicted of second

- degr ee murder.2 The Department has filed an amended concession of error showing that it has provided the statutorily required recommendation to the OEC and has filed a notice of reimbursement demonstrating that appellant’s inmate account has been
reimbursed f or personal costs. We summarily affirm the second issue because the record shows that the information provided to the OEC makes no mention of a first

- degree murder conviction. The circuit court granted a motion to correct the record, noted that appellan t had been convicted of second

- degree murder , and recognized that the
court had misstated that fact in the final order. Accordingly, based on the Department’s proper partial concession of error, we reverse as to the request for reimbursement of personal co sts noting that the Department has already reimbursed the costs , and we summarily affirm the second
issue. ROBERTS, C.J., MAKAR, and JAY, JJ., CONCUR.
*District Judge of the Western District of Louisiana,

sitting by designation.

**Pursuant to 5TH CIRCUIT RULE 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIRCUIT

RULE 47.5.4.

1

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

November 3, 2004

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

______________________

No. 03-11019

______________________

MICHAEL JON PIERCE, JR.,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

vs. 

UNITED RENTALS, INC., UNITED RENTALS 

OCCUPATIONAL INJURY BENEFIT PLAN and 

EMPLOYERS HEALTH INSURANCE COMPANY,

Defendants - Appellees.

______________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 3:01-CV-0995-K

______________________

Before WIENER and PRADO, Circuit Judges, and LITTLE,* District

Judge.

PER CURIAM:**

The court has considered the parties’ positions in light of

oral argument, the briefs, and pertinent portions of the record. 

Having done so, the court finds no reversible error of fact or
2

law and AFFIRMS for essentially the reasons stated by the

district court. See Pierce v. United Rentals, Inc., No. 3:01-CV0995-K, 2003 WL 22289882 (N.D. Tex. Aug. 28, 2003).

AFFIRMED.
Slip Op. 14 - 145 

## UNITED STATES COURT OF INTERNATIONAL TRADE

: CATFISH FARMERS OF AMERICA, et al ., : : Plaintiffs, : : v. : Before: R. Kenton Musgrave, Senior Judge : UNITED STATES, : Court No. 11-00110 : Defendant. : : JUDGMENT Musgrave, Senior Judge: This court’s slip op inion 13-64, 37 CI T (201 3), having granted the plaintiffs’ motion for judgment on the agency record compiled sub nom

. Certain Frozen Fish Fillets from the Socialist Republic of Vietnam: Final Results of the Sixth Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and Sixth New Shipper Review , 76 Fed. Reg. 15941 (Mar. 22, 2011) (“Final Results”), to the extent of remand to the International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce (“Commerce”) to clarify or reconsider its analysis of certain issues addressed in slip opinion 13-63, 37 CIT (2013) that pertain to this case; and the defendant having filed Commerce’s Final Results of Redetermination pursuant to court remand, upon which the court has received interested parties’ written comments; and the court having issued its decision thereon in the context of the opinion on Court No. 11-00109 issued this date; Now therefore, after due deliberation, it is ORDERED , ADJUDGED , and DECREED that Commerce’s Final Results of Redetermination dated Jan. 17, 2014, be, and they hereby are, sustained as to this Court No. 11- 00110. So ordered

. /s/ R. Kenton Musgrave R. Kenton Musgrave, Senior Judge Dated: December 18, 2014 New York, New York
February 18,2015 750 W. PerimeterRd l.'nit #l (415) 228-9510

Office ofthe ChiefCounsel Renton, 'YA 9805j (425) 128-9511 fax

Attention: FAA Part 16 Docket Clerk, AGC-600 Federal Aviation Administration 800 Independence Avenue SW Washington, DC 20591 RE: Part 16 Complaint: Pro-Flight Aviation, Inc. v. City ofRenton FAA Docket Number 16-15-03 Dear Sir or Madam: Pro-Flight Aviation, Inc. has received a letter from Ms. Zanetta Fontes, dated February 12, 2015. In her letter, Ms. Fontes objects to the service ofthe above named Part 16 complaint stating that the complaint was improperly served on the City Attorney's office. Ms. Fontes further states that the only locations within the City ofRenton that are authorized to accept such service are the City Clerk's Office and the Mayor's office. We have been unable to find any references on the City's website regarding which offices within the City are authorized to receive service documents. Pro-Flight Aviation seeks to resolve this matter quickly as time is ofthe essence. To that end, I have hand delivered a copy ofthe original complaint document to the Mayor's office today. Attached is a Certificate ofService for the Complaint and an additional Certificate of service for this letter. Thank you for your prompt attention to this matter. Respectfully yours,



# 3aP~

Bernard A. Paholke Vice President Pro-Flight Aviation, Inc.750 W. PerimeterRd t:nit #I (425) 228-9510 Renton. WA98057 (425)118-95ll fax. 

# Certificate ofService

I certifythat I have this day servedthe foregoing Part 16 Complaint: Pro-FlightAviation v. City ofRenton FAA DocketNumber 16-15-03 on the following person atthe following address byhand delivery. Mayor Denis Law/ 

### t_ 1'/

### I( 

## C.- L 

### 02. 1 

### L City ofRenton,

# v/ A 1055 South Grady Way Renton, W A 98057 Datedthis 18th day ofFebruary, 2015.

Received by: 

# v ' . OriS 

# L Cf.,_u
for the City ofRenton. C\1'1 OF p,Et-HON



# DallJRY 

# w tr5 

# R Er:Js 

### e0 

### fT-J 

## /YJ;;t 

# '/tH"L's flf'J 

## b t-v 

### A-S 

## 11

# cc.. efJ 

# no ;4/ 

## C.t IV f... t... ff.l( 

# 's o;:.:

**~~** 

### c:.

**~**
exh10_3.htm


 










Exhibit 10.3


 



Amendment to


 


COLLABORATION AGREEMENT


 


BY AND BETWEEN


 


ZBB Energy Corporation


 


AND


 


Honam Petrochemical Corporation (now known as LOTTE Chemical Corporation)


Dated 3/25/11


 


(“Agreement”)


 



This Amendment is effective as of December 16, 2013 (the “Effective Date”), and is by and between LOTTE CHEMICAL CORPORATION (“LOTTE”), a division of LOTTE Group, a Korean company having its place of business at The LOTTE Tower Building, 395-67 Shindaebang-Dong, Dongjak-Gu, Seoul, the Republic of Korea, and ZBB ENERGY CORPORATION (“ZBB”), a Wisconsin Corporation having its place of business at N93 W14475 Whittaker Way, Menomonee Falls, Wisconsin, USA.


 


The attached Appendix contains the patent application schedule, as agreed between ZBB and LOTTE.


 


Article 5 of the Agreement is amended as follows:


 


1.  The first paragraph of Section 5.4 of the Agreement is deleted and replaced with the following:


 


“ZBB shall file any patent applications developed as part of the Project, and the Parties shall each be co-assignees of any such patent applications and resulting patents.  Notwithstanding the foregoing, if LOTTE files any patent applications, the Parties shall each be co-assignees of any such patent applications and resulting patents. The Parties will share all patent filing, prosecution and examination costs, any patent maintenance fees, and all other costs of procuring and maintaining such patents on an equal, 50-50 basis.  If either Party ceases to pay its share of such costs, its co-ownership rights shall pass to the other Party.”


 


2.  Section 5.6 of the Agreement is deleted and replaced with the following:


 


“In any action to enforce the Parties’ patent rights, the Parties must agree to file any such litigation.  Once the parties agree to file litigation, both Parties shall cooperate with each other in any such litigation, share equally in the costs of any such litigation and share equally in the recovery of any damages.”


 


3.  Section 5.7 of the Agreement is deleted.


 


4.  Section 5.8 of the Agreement is deleted.


 


5.  Section 5.9 of the Agreement is deleted.


 


Agreed:


 





	LOTTE Chemical Corporation 	ZBB Energy Corporation
	 	 
	By: /s/ D. W. Lee                                        	By: /s/ Eric C. Apfelbach                             
	Name: Dong Woo Lee	Name: Eric Apfelbach
	Title: Chief Research Director	Title: President & CEO
	Signature Date: December 16, 2013	Signature Date: December 16, 2013