alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.2
 
 
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 
 
 In connection with the Quarterly Report of Empire Global Gaming, Inc. (the “Company”) on form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Dolores Marsh, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge, that:
  (1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
 
 (2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 Date:
May 13, 2011
/s/ Dolores MarshChief Financial Officer(Principal Financial Officer)
 
 A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Order entered March 20, 2014

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-13-01371-CR

No. 05-13-01372-CR

No. 05-13-01373-CR

No. 05-13-01374-CR

CHARLES BRIGHTMON, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 265th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause Nos. F11-59566-R, F11-59567-R, F11-59568-R, F13-56195-R

ORDER

The Court ORDERS the Dallas County District Clerk to file the clerk’s records in these 

appeals within TWENTY-ONE DAYS of the date of this order.

We DIRECT the Clerk to send copies of this order, by electronic transmission, to Gary 

Fitzsimmons, Dallas County District Clerk; the Dallas County District Clerk’s Office, Criminal 

Records Division; and to counsel for all parties.

/s/ LANA MYERS 

JUSTICE
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 165 (Friday, August 24, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Page 42866]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-18285]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMISSION ON CIVIL RIGHTS


Notice of Public Meeting of the Maryland Advisory Committee; 
Correction

AGENCY: U.S. Commission on Civil Rights.

ACTION: Correction: Announcement of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Commission on Civil Rights published a document August 14, 
2018, announcing an upcoming Maryland Advisory Committee. The document 
contained incorrect address to the meeting.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Barbara de La Viez, DFO, at 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#98fafcfdf4f9eef1fde2d8edebfbfbeab6fff7ee"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="4b292f2e272a3d222e310b3e38282839652c243d">[email protected]</span></a> or 202-376-7533.

CORRECTION: In the Federal Register of August 14, 2018, in FR Doc. 
2018-17401, on pages 40223-40224 in the first and second columns, 
delete the ``Address'' and replace it with Murphy Fine Arts Center, 
Recital Hall, 2201 Argonne Dr., Baltimore, MD 21251.

    Dated: August 20, 2018.
David Mussatt,
Supervisory Chief, Regional Programs Unit.
[FR Doc. 2018-18285 Filed 8-23-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### Mrs. Jamie BEARD, widow of Harvey FINCH v. Louis JORDANO, Jr., et al.

No. 54204.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Dec. 19, 1973.

In re: Mrs. Jamie Beard, Widow of Harvey Finch applying for Certiorari, or Writ of Review to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, Parish of Jefferson, 284 So.2d 641.

Writ refused. On the facts found by the Court of Appeal, there is no error of law in its judgment.

TATE, DIXON and CALOGERO, JJ., dissent from the refusal to grant.
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 3407

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide clarification for

the deductibility of expenses incurred by a taxpayer in connection with

the business use of the home.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

OCTOBER 28, 1993

Mr. HOAGLAND (for himself, Mrs. JOHNSON of Connecticut, Mr. LEWIS of

Georgia, Mr. CRANE, Mr. MFUME, Mr. SANTORUM, and Mr. KOPETSKI)

introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on

Ways and Means

A BILL

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide

clarification for the deductibility of expenses incurred

by a taxpayer in connection with the business use of

the home.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Home Office Deduc5 tion Act’’.
2

•HR 3407 IH

1 SEC. 2. CLARIFICATION OF DEFINITION OF PRINCIPAL

2 PLACE OF BUSINESS.

3 Subsection (f) of section 280A of the Internal Reve4 nue Code of 1986 is amended by redesignating paragraphs

5 (2), (3), and (4) as paragraphs (3), (4), and (5), respec6 tively, and by inserting after paragraph (1) the following

7 new paragraph:

8 ‘‘(2) PRINCIPAL PLACE OF BUSINESS.—For

9 purposes of subsection (c), a home office shall in any

10 case qualify as the principal place of business if—

11 ‘‘(A) the office is the location where the

12 taxpayer’s essential administrative or manage13 ment activities are conducted on a regular and

14 systematic (and not incidental) basis by the tax15 payer, and

16 ‘‘(B) the office is necessary because the

17 taxpayer has no other location for the perform18 ance of the administrative or management ac19 tivities of the business.’’

20 SEC. 3. TREATMENT OF STORAGE OF PRODUCT SAMPLES.

21 Paragraph (2) of section 280A(c) of the Internal Rev22 enue Code of 1986 is amended by striking ‘‘inventory’’

23 and inserting ‘‘inventory or product samples’’.

24 SEC. 4. EFFECTIVE DATE.

25 The amendments made by this Act shall apply to tax26 able years beginning after December 31, 1991.
3

•HR 3407 IH

Æ
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-18-00091-CV

Javier M. Alarcia, Appellant

v.

Julie Gianelloni Connor, Appellee

FROM THE COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 1 OF TRAVIS COUNTY

NO. C-1-CV-14-007875, THE HONORABLE TODD T. WONG, JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N 

Appellant Javier M. Alarcia has filed an unopposed motion to dismiss this appeal. 

We grant appellant’s motion and dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a).

__________________________________________

Scott K. Field, Justice

Before Chief Justice Rose, Justices Pemberton and Field

Dismissed on Appellant’s Motion

Filed: July 6, 2018
| 1.     | Such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended February 28, 2011, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                                             |
|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                             |
| 2.     | The information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended February 28, 2011, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Emerging Growth Acquisitions I, Inc. |

|                            | EMERGING GROWTH ACQUISITIONS I, INC. |                                                                                                                                                                                                            |
|---------------------------------|--------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                            |                                 |                                                                                                                                                                                                            |   |
| Date:  April 13, 2011 | By:                                  | /s/ Amit Tandon                                 |   |
|                            |                                 | Amit Tandon, President                                                                                                                                                                                          |   |
|                            |                                 | Principal Executive Officer,Principal Financial OfficerPrincipal Accounting Officer, Director                                                                                                                   |   |
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
The Schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the financial
statements for Independence Tax Credit Plus L.P. III and is qualified in its
entirety by reference to such financial statements
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              MAR-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                 APR-1-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                         14,546,721  
<SECURITIES>                                   6,500,000   
<RECEIVABLES>                                  0           
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0           
<INVENTORY>                                    0           
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               893,743     
<PP&E>                                         55,149,752  
<DEPRECIATION>                                 1,937,998   
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 76,809,089  
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          6,178,611   
<BONDS>                                        31,872,140  
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0           
<PREFERRED>                                    0           
<COMMON>                                       0           
<OTHER-SE>                                     38,758,338  
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   76,809,089  
<SALES>                                        0           
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               3,420,191   
<CGS>                                          0           
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  0           
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               4,067,765   
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0           
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             772,263     
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,417,274) 
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0           
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            0           
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0           
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0           
<CHANGES>                                      0           
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,417,274) 
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (32.30)     
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0           
                                               


</TABLE>
**Exhibit 31.1**

**Certification**

I, Brady W. Dougan,certify that:

l.      I havereviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Credit Suisse (USA), Inc.;

2.     Based onmy knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.     Based onmy knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;

4.     Theregistrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for theregistrant and have:

a)               Designed suchdisclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

b)              Evaluated theeffectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

c)               Disclosed in thisreport any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reportingthat occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5.     Theregistrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based onour most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a)               All significantdeficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and

b)              Anyfraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.
| Date: March 20, 2006 |   | /s/ BRADY W. DOUGAN                      |
|---------------------------|--------|------------------------------------------|
|                      | Name:  | Brady W. Dougan                          |
|                      | Title: | *President and Chief Executive  Officer* |

 

----
COURT OF APPEALS

	SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

	FORT WORTH

	NO. 2-10-170-CR

LARRY HUDSON	APPELLANT

	V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS	STATE

	------------

	FROM THE 89TH DISTRICT COURT OF WICHITA COUNTY

	------------

	MEMORANDUM OPINION1

	------------

	Appellant Larry Hudson attempts to appeal from the trial court’s “judgment entered ‘Denied’” on March 1, 2010.  We dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction.

	Hudson appeared in this court several years ago in a direct appeal from his conviction for aggravated assault.  See Hudson v. State, No. 02-04-00030- CR, 2005 WL 1244663, at *1 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth May 26, 2005, pet. ref’d) (mem. op., not designated for publication). The judgment of conviction in that case was entered on January 22, 2004.  Id.  Hudson subsequently filed a document entitled “Motion for Transcript,” on March 1, 2010,2 and the trial court denied that motion on the same day.

	On May 19, 2010, this court notified the parties of our concern that we lacked jurisdiction over this appeal because the trial court had not entered any appealable orders.  We stated that unless Hudson or any party desiring to continue the appeal filed with the court a response showing grounds for continuing the appeal, the appeal could be dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Hudson filed a response, but it does not address our concerns about jurisdiction.3

	Generally, this court only has jurisdiction to consider an appeal by a criminal defendant when there has been a final judgment of conviction.  See Bridle v. State, 16 S.W.3d 906, 907 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth 2000, no pet.); McKown v. State, 915 S.W.2d 160, 161 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth 1996, no pet.); see also Apolinar v. State, 820 S.W.2d 792, 794 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991) (“The courts of appeals do not have jurisdiction to review interlocutory orders unless that jurisdiction has been expressly granted by law.”).  

	Other than his 2004 judgment of conviction, which we previously addressed in his direct appeal, Hudson has provided no other basis here for the exercise of jurisdiction by this court, and the order he attempts to appeal is neither a final judgment nor an appealable interlocutory order.  Cf. Wright v. State, 969 S.W.2d 588, 589 (Tex. App.—Dallas 1998, no pet.) (listing narrow exceptions to rule that appellate courts have no jurisdiction to review interlocutory orders absent express authority).  Therefore, we dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction.  See Tex. R. App. P. 43.2(f).

							PER CURIAM

PANEL:  MCCOY, J.; LIVINGSTON, C.J.; and MEIER, J.

DO NOT PUBLISH

Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b)

DELIVERED:  July 15, 2010
EXHIBIT 32.2 – CFO Certification











CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUNT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In connection with the Quarterly Report of Liberated Energy, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the three months ended March 31, 2013 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Elyse Thompson, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.ss. 1350, as added by ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1.         The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.         The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the period covered by the Report.








/s/ Elyse Thompson
 Name: Elyse Thompson
 Title: Chief Financial Officer and





May 15, 2013





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 ("Section 906"), or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Liberated Energy, Inc., and will be retained by Liberated Energy, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit: 32.2

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of The Singing Machine Company, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-K for the period ended March 31, 2005 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Danny Zheng, Chief Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

            (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
      or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

            (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
      material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
      Company.

                                        /s/ Danny Zheng
                                        -----------------------------
                                        Danny Zheng
                                        Chief Financial Officer
                                        (Principal Financial Officer and
                                        Principal Accounting Officer)

Date: June 28, 2005
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 23.5

                    REPORT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS


AUDIT REPORT

To the general meeting of the shareholders of Frigoscandia Holding AB

Corporate identity number 556542-7704


We have audited the annual accounts, the consolidated accounts, the accounting
records and the administration of the board of directors and the managing
director of Frigoscandia Holding AB for the year 1999.  These accounts and the
administration of the company are the responsibility of the board of directors
and the managing director.  Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the
annual accounts, the consolidated accounts and the administration based on our
audit.

We conducted our audit in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards
in Sweden.  Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance that the annual accounts and the consolidated accounts are
free of material misstatement.  An audit includes examining, on a test basis,
evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the accounts.  An audit also
includes assessing the accounting principles used and their application by the
board of directors and the managing director, as well as evaluating the overall
presentation of information in the annual accounts and the consolidated
accounts. As in basis for our opinion concerning discharge from liability, we
examined significant decisions, actions taken and circumstances of the company
in order to be able to determine the liability, if any, to the company of any
board member or the managing director. We also examined whether any board member
or the managing director has, in any other way, acted in contravention of the
Companies Act, the Annual Accounts Act or the Articles of Association. We
believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion set out
below.

The annual accounts and the consolidated accounts have been prepared in
accordance with the Annual Accounts Act, and, thereby, give a true and fair view
of the company's and the group's financial position and results of operations in
accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in Sweden.

We recommend to the general meeting of the shareholders that the income
statements and balance sheets of the parent company and the group be adopted,
that the profit for the parent company be dealt with in accordance with the
proposal in the administration report and that the members of the board of
directors and the managing director be discharged from liability for the
financial year.



Stockholm January 24, 2000
KPMG AB