alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
No. 1D 2023

- 0 735

_____________________________
T HEODORE R. S URRENCY , Appellant,

v.

S TATE OF F LORIDA , Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Baker County

. James M. Colaw , Judge

. February 28, 2024

P ER C URIAM

.
A FFIRMED

.
L EWIS , B ILBREY , and L ONG , JJ., concur

.

_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________2 Theodore R. Surrency, pro se
, Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and David Welch, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee
, for Appellee.
V

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 3753

For the relief of Thomas R. Dahlberg.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JANUARY 26, 1994

Mr. MURPHY introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on the Judiciary

A BILL

For the relief of Thomas R. Dahlberg.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. RELIEF OF LIABILITY.

4 Thomas R. Dahlberg of Hempfield Township, Penn5 sylvania, is relieved of liability to pay to the United States

6 the attorney fees and court costs the United States Dis7 trict Court for the Fort Wayne Division of the Northern

8 District of Indiana required Mr. Dahlberg to pay under

9 its order in the civil action entitled Civil No. F 89–151.

10 Mr. Dahlberg is relieved of such liability because Mr.

11 Dahlberg is permanently disabled with a primary chronic

12 post-traumatic stress disorder, is receiving benefits under
2

HR 3753 IH

1 title II of the Social Security Act based on disability, and

2 is otherwise unable to pay such fees and costs.

Æ
#### City of Cleveland, Appellee, *v.*Sado, Appellant.

(No. 30453

Decided October 31, 1945.)

*Mr. Lee C. Rowley,*director of law, *Mr. Anthony A. Rutkowski*and *Mr. Bernard J. Conway,*for appellee.

*Messrs. Easly, Wursthorn & Acker,*for appellant.

It is ordered and adjudged that this appeal a§ of right be, and the same hereby is, dismissed for the reason that no debatable constitutional question is involved.

*Appeal dismissed.*

Weygandt, C. J., Zimmerman, Bell, Williams, Turner, Matthias and Hart, JJ., concur.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(a) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended, notice is hereby given of a meeting of the Sickle Cell Disease Advisory Committee.

The meeting will be open to the public, with attendance limited to space available. Individuals who plan to attend and need special assistance, such as sign language interpretation or other reasonable accommodations, should notify the Contact Person listed below in advance of the meeting.

*Name of Committee:*                         Sickle Cell Disease Advisory Committee.                    

*Date:*                         November 16, 2018.                    

*Time:*                         8:30 a.m. to 4:00 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         Presentations and Discussion of Programs.                    

*Place:*                         National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, 6701 Rockledge Drive, 9th Floor, Room 9100/9104, Bethesda, MD 20892.                    

*Contact Person:*                         W. Keith Hoots, MD, Director, Division of Blood Diseases and Resources, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Suite 9030, Bethesda, MD 20892, 301-435-0080,                         *hootswk@nhlbi.nih.gov*.                    

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.233, National Center for Sleep Disorders Research; 93.837, Heart and Vascular Diseases Research; 93.838, Lung Diseases Research; 93.839, Blood Diseases and Resources Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: August 22, 2018.

David D. Clary,

Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2018-18549 Filed 8-27-18; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
# C_2015142EN.01001901.xml

| 29.4.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 142/19 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.4.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 142/19

---

Opinion of the Advisory Committee on restrictive practices and dominant positions given at its meeting of 6 December 2013 regarding a draft decision relating to Case AT.39685(2) Fentanyl

Rapporteur: Latvia/UK

(2015/C 142/08)

| 1. | The Advisory Committee agrees with the Commission that fines should be imposed on the addressees of the draft decision. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The Advisory Committee agrees with the Commission that fines should be imposed on the addressees of the draft decision.

| 2. | The Advisory Committee agrees with the Commission on the basic amount of the fine for Johnson & Johnson/Janssen-Cilag B.V. |
| --- | --- |

2.

The Advisory Committee agrees with the Commission on the basic amount of the fine for Johnson & Johnson/Janssen-Cilag B.V.

| 3. | The Advisory Committee agrees with the Commission on the increase for Johnson & Johnson/Janssen-Cilag B.V. to ensure a sufficient deterrent effect. |
| --- | --- |

3.

The Advisory Committee agrees with the Commission on the increase for Johnson & Johnson/Janssen-Cilag B.V. to ensure a sufficient deterrent effect.

| 4. | The Advisory Committee agrees with the Commission on the final amount of the fine for Johnson & Johnson/Janssen-Cilag B.V. |
| --- | --- |

4.

The Advisory Committee agrees with the Commission on the final amount of the fine for Johnson & Johnson/Janssen-Cilag B.V.

| 5. | The Advisory Committee agrees with the Commission’s approach to base the calculation of fine for Novartis AG/Sandoz B.V. on the value transferred. |
| --- | --- |

5.

The Advisory Committee agrees with the Commission’s approach to base the calculation of fine for Novartis AG/Sandoz B.V. on the value transferred.

| 6. | The Advisory Committee agrees with the Commission on the increase for Novartis AG/Sandoz B.V. to ensure a sufficient deterrent effect. |
| --- | --- |

6.

The Advisory Committee agrees with the Commission on the increase for Novartis AG/Sandoz B.V. to ensure a sufficient deterrent effect.

| 7. | The Advisory Committee agrees with the Commission on the final amount of the fine for Novartis AG/Sandoz B.V. |
| --- | --- |

7.

The Advisory Committee agrees with the Commission on the final amount of the fine for Novartis AG/Sandoz B.V.

| 8. | The Advisory Committee recommends the publication of its opinion in the Official Journal of the European Union. |
| --- | --- |

8.

The Advisory Committee recommends the publication of its opinion in the Official Journal of the European Union.

Official Journal of the European Union

---
Exhibit
13.2








PRINCIPAL
EXECUTIVE OFFICER CERTIFICATION


PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350








In
connection with this Annual Report of CalPetro Tankers (Bahamas II) Limited (the
"Company") on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2009 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the "SEC") on or about the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Kate Blankenship, Principal Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)  The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)  The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


A signed
original of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be
retained by the Company and furnished to the SEC or its staff upon
request.





Date:
April 29, 2010










/s/ Kate Blankenship


Kate
Blankenship


Principal
Financial Officer
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR
. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR
. R. 47.5.4. 

### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-60760 Summary Calendar

SALAH AHMAD NAJJAR Petitioner

v. MICHAEL B MUKASEY, U S ATTORNEY GENERAL Respondent

Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals BIA No. A72 815 810
Before JONES, Chief Judge, and STEWART and OWEN, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Salah Ahmad Najjar has filed a petition for review of a final order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) affirming the Immigration Judge’s (IJ) denial of his application for cancellation of removal under 8 U.S.C. § 1229b(b). Najjar argues that, in determining that he did not establish the requisite “exceptional and extremely unusual hardship,” the IJ failed to consider the hardship factors in the aggregate and their cumulative effect. Although this is couched as a legal question, Najjar is asking this court to review the IJ’s United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

### F I L E D September 26, 2008 Charles R. Fulbruge III ClerkNo. 07-60760

2 hardship determination. We lack jurisdiction to do so. See 8 U.S.C. § 1252(a)(2)(B)(i); Rueda v. Ashcroft, 380 F.3d 831, 831 (5th Cir. 2004). We dismiss the petition to the extent that it seeks review from the BIA’s discretionary decision to deny cancellation of removal. Najjar argues that the IJ acted contrary to lawby questioning whether his stepchildren are qualifying relativesfor cancellation purposes; that the IJ denied his Fifth Amendment due process right to a fair hearing by questioning his good moral character and erred in finding marital fraud; and that the differential treatment ofArabs in immigration courts violates the Equal Protection Clause. Because Najjar was denied cancellation of removal because he failed to establish the hardship requirement, we do not address whether the IJ erred in questioning whether Najjar met the other requ irements. Najjar’s due process and equal protection claims are unavailing. See Mireles-Valdez v. Ashcroft, 349 F.3d 213, 219 (5th Cir. 2003); Ahmed v. Gonzales, 447 F.3d 433, 439 (5th Cir. 2006). The petition is denied as to these claims. PETITION DISMISSED IN PART, DENIED IN PART.
P. 1 

# OAR Box 

# 1865 Prepped by Charmelle Mathews



## Document

Number: 

# 20 ) IV-E- 8 Docket Number: 

# A-83-2 7

Printed 12/3/20089:15:27

AM Sheet 20of 105P. 2 

# A-83-2 7 IV-E- 8 CONTAC T REPOR T 

### 0\l I t \°iK Originato rMoC^ i CONTACT BY : TELEPHON E ^ MEETIN G D Othe r Dat e . ~^» . - u . NAME , TITL E & ORGANIZATIO N ^ ^e n .Kk»^J ; Ma rkt ^ M*nay r fleeter/"Dorr-Ol . v/e r ADDRES S & TELEPHON E NUMBE R p Q g 0 x^j f PURPOS E O R SUBJEC

T(Giv e project numbe ri f appropriate ) 

## Gjroojt^Treat s tr > 

## lnsf'fj(i(ma/ " Uch.^&l DO\UCS SUMMAR Y 

### rv 

# f , ({liAQd

sfdf o M M t 'Vmbe rofV^ J talerj lV l 

# ^

* 10,000 pp 

# U 0*- 5 MMtfU ) . 5 - ao o ^'fi/j^ . O f iUt,
r^f^^ J fA^S<K

^ ^ c?^ % fo rpol^-^ol-^e rW

ACTIO N C O 

# i Distribution :
#### Mrs. Cony PENA, wife of Donald Edward PHILLPOTT v. Donald Edward PHILLPOTT.

No. 54299.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Feb. 1, 1974.

In re: Donald Edward Phillpott applying for certiorari or writ of review to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, Parish of Orleans. 285 So.2d 570.

Writ refused. On the facts found by the court of appeal, there is no error of law in its judgment.
#### Donald Ray SPILLERS v. MONTGOMERY WARD & COMPANY, INC., et al.

No. 54030.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Nov. 9, 1973.

In re: G & S Manufacturing Co., Inc. and Truck Insurance Exchange applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Second Circuit, Parish of Ouachita, 282 So.2d 546.

It is ordered that the writ of review issue; that the Court of Appeal send up the record in duplicate of the case; and that counsel for plaintiff and defendant be notified.
#### Susan Elizabeth ARCHER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 71-809.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

June 29, 1973.

Louis R. Bowen, Jr., Public Defender, and William C. Gridley and Gerald Woodrow Jones, Asst. Public Defenders, Orlando, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Andrew I. Friedrich, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant seeks reversal of a final judgment, entered pursuant to jury verdict, finding her guilty of three counts of possession of narcotics and narcotic paraphernalia.

We have carefully examined the record on appeal and have considered the briefs filed by the parties herein. It is our conclusion that appellant has failed to demonstrate reversible error in the proceedings below and the judgment appealed is accordingly affirmed.

*341REED, C. J., and LESTER, M. IGNATIUS, Associate Judge, concur.

MAGER, J., dissents with opinion.

MAGER, Judge

(dissenting):

I must respectfully dissent for the reason that, while -the evidence was sufficient to support defendant’s conviction for possession of narcotic paraphernalia, in my opinion the evidence was not sufficient to sustain a conviction for possession of narcotics. Arant v. State, Fla.App.1972, 256 So.2d 515; State v. Eckroth, Fla.1970, 238 So.2d 75. As the Supreme Court pointed out in *Eckroth, supra,*to constitute possession, “ ‘There must, however, be a conscious and substantial possession by the accused, as distinguished from a mere involuntary or superficial possession.’ ” The evidence in the case sub judice was not sufficient to negate defendant’s involuntary possession. I would, therefore, reverse that part of the judgment of conviction pertaining to possession of narcotics.
# C_2015227EN.01000601.xml

| 11.7.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 227/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.7.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 227/6

---

Information communicated by Member States regarding closure of fisheries

(2015/C 227/06)

In accordance with Article 35(3) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1224/2009 of 20 November 2009 establishing a Community control system for ensuring compliance with the rules of the common fisheries policy (1), a decision has been taken to close the fishery as set down in the following table:

1

| Date and time of closure | 12.6.2015 |
| --- | --- |
| Duration | 12.6-31.12.2015 |
| Member State | Denmark |
| Stock or Group of stocks | SAN/234_2 |
| Species | Sandeel (Ammodytes spp.) |
| Zone | Union waters of sandeel management area 2 |
| Type(s) of fishing vessels | — |
| Reference number | 07/TQ104 |

Date and time of closure

12.6.2015

Duration

12.6-31.12.2015

Member State

Denmark

Stock or Group of stocks

SAN/234_2

Species

Sandeel (Ammodytes spp.)

Ammodytes

Zone

Union waters of sandeel management area 2

Type(s) of fishing vessels

—

Reference number

07/TQ104

---

(1)  OJ L 343, 22.12.2009, p. 1.

1

---
**Exhibit 23.1**

**Consent of Ernst & Young LLP, Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

We consent tothe incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-24135) pertaining to the Palm Harbor Homes, Inc. Employee Savings Plan, and in the Registration Statements (Form S-3 No. 333-52535 and Form S-3No. 333-118669) and in the related Prospectuses of Palm Harbor Homes, Inc. and subsidiaries, of our reports dated May 31, 2007, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of Palm Harbor Homes, Inc., Palm Harbor Homes, Inc.management’s assessment of internal control over financial reporting, and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of Palm Harbor Homes, Inc. included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended March 30,2007, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. 

/s/ Ernst & Young LLP 

Dallas, Texas 

May 31, 2007
**Exhibit 12.1**

 

**Management Certification under Section 302 of Sarbanes Oxley:**

 

I, André Lacroix, Chairman ofthe Board and Chief Executive Officer of Euro Disney S.A.S. (the “ManagementCompany”), certify that:

 

1.             I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-Fof Euro Disney S.C.A. (the “Company”);

 

2.             Based on my knowledge, this reportdoes not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state amaterial fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading withrespect to the period covered by this report;

 

3.             Based on my knowledge, the financialstatements, and other financial information included in this report, fairlypresent in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport;

 

4.             TheCompany’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the company and have:

 

(a)   Designed such disclosure controls andprocedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designedunder our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to theCompany, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by otherswithin those entities, particularly during the period in which this report isbeing prepared;

 

(b)   Evaluated the effectiveness of the Company’sdisclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusionsabout the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of theend of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

 

(c)   Disclosed in this report any change in theCompany’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during theperiod covered by the annual report that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and

 

5.             The Company’s other certifyingofficer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internalcontrol over financial reporting, to the Company’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the Company’s board of directors (or persons performing equivalentfunctions):

 

(a)   All significant deficiencies and materialweaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financialreporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Company’s abilityto record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

 

(b)   Any fraud, whether or not material, thatinvolves management or other employees who have a significant role in theCompany’s internal control over financial reporting.

 

Date:       January 10, 2005

 
| By:    | /s/ André Lacroix   |
|--------|--------------------------|
| Name:  | André Lacroix       |
| Title: | Chairman of the Board    |
|   | Chief Executive  Officer |   |

 

1

----
# C_2018035EN.01016101.xml

| 31.1.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 35/161 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

31.1.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 35/161

---

P8_TA(2016)0053

EU-San Marino agreement on the automatic exchange of financial account information*

European Parliament legislative resolution of 25 February 2016 on the proposal for a Council decision on the conclusion, on behalf of the European Union, of the Amending Protocol to the Agreement between the European Community and the Republic of San Marino providing for measures equivalent to those laid down in Council Directive 2003/48/EC on taxation of savings income in the form of interest payments (COM(2015)0518 — C8-0370/2015 — 2015/0244(NLE))

(Consultation)

(2018/C 035/38)

The European Parliament,

The European Parliament

| — | having regard to the proposal for a Council decision (COM(2015)0518), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the proposal for a Council decision (COM(2015)0518),

| — | having regard to the draft Amending Protocol to the Agreement between the European Community and the Republic of San Marino providing for measures equivalent to those laid down in Council Directive 2003/48/EC on taxation of savings income in the form of interest payments (13448/2015), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the draft Amending Protocol to the Agreement between the European Community and the Republic of San Marino providing for measures equivalent to those laid down in Council Directive 2003/48/EC on taxation of savings income in the form of interest payments (13448/2015),

| — | having regard to Article 115 and Article 218(6), second subparagraph, point (b), and paragraph (8), second subparagraph, of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament (C8-0370/2015), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to Article 115 and Article 218(6), second subparagraph, point (b), and paragraph (8), second subparagraph, of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament (C8-0370/2015),

| — | having regard to Rules 59, 108(7) and 50(1) of its Rules of Procedure, |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to Rules 59, 108(7) and 50(1) of its Rules of Procedure,

| — | having regard to the report of the Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs (A8-0025/2016), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the report of the Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs (A8-0025/2016),

| 1. | Approves conclusion of the Amending Protocol to the Agreement; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Approves conclusion of the Amending Protocol to the Agreement;

| 2. | Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council, the Commission and the governments and parliaments of the Member States and of the Republic of San Marino. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council, the Commission and the governments and parliaments of the Member States and of the Republic of San Marino.

---