alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
U.S. flag
              An official website of the United States government Skip to main content   end of header Census.gov Newsroom Releases 2010 Census
 Newsroom Archive
 Skip left menu navigation
 About the Newsroom
 				Facts for Features
 				**News Releases**
 				Press Kits
 				Tip Sheets
 Release Information CB11-CN.12 **Contact:**  Public Information Office
301-763-3030
 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:  FEBRUARY 2, 2011 Media Advisory — Census Bureau Ships Local 2010 Census Data to Virginia https://www.census.gov/rdo/data http://factfinder2.census.gov The data will include summaries of population totals, as well as data on race, Hispanic origin and voting age. These data will be presented for multiple geographies within the state, such as census blocks, tracts, voting districts, cities, counties and school districts. According to Public Law 94-171, the Census Bureau must provide redistricting data to the 50 states no later than April 1 of the year following the census. As a result, the Census Bureau is delivering the data state-by-state on a flow basis in February and March. All states will receive their data by April 1, 2011.
  https://www.census.gov/rdo http://2010.census.gov/news/press-kits/redistricting.html Follow us on http://2010.census.gov/news/press-kits/redistricting.html and follow us on Twitter, Facebook, Flickr and YouTube (/uscensusbureau).
  CONNECT WITH US

Information Quality
                    Data Linkage Infrastructure
                    Data Protection and Privacy Policy
                    Accessibility      
                    FOIA
                    Inspector General
                    No FEAR Act
                    U.S. Department of Commerce
                    USA.gov
                   Measuring America's People, Places, and Economy
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3617 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3617

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           November 23, 1993

                                Received

            November 24 (legislative day, November 23), 1993

    Read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural 
                               Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To amend the Everglades National Park Protection and Expansion Act of 
                     1989, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled, That section 104 of the 
Everglades National Park Protection and Expansion Act of 1989 (16 
U.S.C. 410r-8) is hereby amended by adding at the end thereof the 
following new subsection:
    ``(k)(1) Notwithstanding any other provision of this Act, the 
Secretary is authorized to use funds appropriated pursuant to this Act, 
including any available funds appropriated to the National Park Service 
for construction in the Department of the Interior and Related Agencies 
Appropriations Acts for fiscal years 1991 through 1994 for project 
modifications by the Army Corps of Engineers, in such amounts as 
determined by the Secretary, to provide Federal assistance to the State 
of Florida (including political subdivisions of the State) for 
acquisition of lands described in paragraph (4).
    ``(2) With respect to any lands acquired pursuant to this 
subsection, the Secretary may provide not more than 25 percent of the 
total cost of such acquisition.
    ``(3) All funds made available pursuant to this subsection shall be 
transferred to the State of Florida or a political subdivision of the 
State, subject to an agreement that any lands acquired with such funds 
will be managed in perpetuity for the restoration of natural flows to 
the park or Florida Bay.
    ``(4) The lands referred to in paragraph (1) are those lands or 
interests therein adjacent to, or affecting the restoration of natural 
water flows to, the park or Florida Bay which are located east of the 
park and known as the Frog Pond, Rocky Glades Agricultural Area, and 
the Eight-and-One-Half Square-Mile Area.''.

            Passed the House of Representatives November 23 
      (legislative day, November 22), 1993.

            Attest:

                                           DONNALD K. ANDERSON,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
#### George L. HARRIS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 71-669.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Nov. 5, 1971.

Appeal dismissed.
EXHIBIT 32.2

                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                            18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In  connection  with the  Quarterly  Report  of  Advanced  Cellular,  Inc.  (the
"Company")  on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2011,  as filed with the
Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof (the  "Report"),  the
undersigned,  as the Chief Financial  Officer of the Company,  hereby  certifies
pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350,  as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

     (1)  the Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  the  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


By: /s/ Nir Eliyahu
   ----------------------------------------
   President, Chief Executive Officer,
   Chief Financial Officer, Director
   (Principal Executive Officer,
   Principal Financial Officer,
   Principal Accounting Officer)

   May 9, 2011
# C_2015376EN.01001202.xml

| 13.11.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 376/12 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.11.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 376/12

---

Notification of the Austrian Government pursuant to Article 10(2) of Directive 2009/73/EC of the European Parliament and the Council (‘Gas Directive’) concerning common rules for the internal market in natural gas regarding the designation of Gas Connect Austria GmbH (GCA) and Trans Austria Gasleitung GmbH (TAG) as transmission system operators in Austria

(2015/C 376/08)

Following the Austrian regulatory authority’s final decision of:

| 1. | 6 July 2012, PA 2782/12 and 18 July 2014, PA 1594/14 regarding the certification of Gas Connect Austria GmbH (GCA) as Independent transmission operator; |
| --- | --- |

1.

6 July 2012, PA 2782/12 and 18 July 2014, PA 1594/14 regarding the certification of Gas Connect Austria GmbH (GCA) as Independent transmission operator;

| 2. | 18 July 2014, PA 1593/14 and 14 September 2015, PA 13199/15 regarding the certification of Trans Austria Gasleitung GmbH (TAG) as Independent transmission operator; |
| --- | --- |

2.

18 July 2014, PA 1593/14 and 14 September 2015, PA 13199/15 regarding the certification of Trans Austria Gasleitung GmbH (TAG) as Independent transmission operator;

Austria has notified to the Commission the official approval and designation of these companies as a transmission system operator operating in Austria in accordance with Article 10 of the Gas Directive of the European Parliament and the Council.

Any additional information can be obtained at the following address:

| Federal Ministry of Science, Research and Economy |
| --- |
| Department of Energy and Mining |
| Division Energy — Legal Affairs |
| E-mail: POST.III1@bmwfw.gv.at |
| Tel. +43 171100-3011 |
| Internet: www.bmwfw.gv.at |

Federal Ministry of Science, Research and Economy

Department of Energy and Mining

Division Energy — Legal Affairs

E-mail: POST.III1@bmwfw.gv.at

Tel. +43 171100-3011

Internet: www.bmwfw.gv.at

---
# Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida
Opinion filed December 15, 2021

. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________ No. 3D20

- 1477 Lower Tribunal No s

. EPC No. 20

- 0140

- RA and PPS No. 189

- 2770

________________ 

### Michael Andrew Moran, Appellant,

vs. 

### Richard Corcoran, as Commissioner of Education , Appellee.

An Appeal from the State of Florida, Education Practices Commission

. Tripp Scott, P.A., and Edward J. Pozzuoli, Stephanie D. Alexander and Thomas B. Sternberg (Fort Lauderdale) , for appellant. Bonnie Wilmot, Deputy General Counsel, for the Florida Department of Education (Tallahasse e ) , for appellee.

Before LOGUE, HENDON and LOBREE , JJ. LOGUE, J.2 Appellant challenges the severity of the penalty imposed upon him by the Education Practices Commission. The record shows that he did not dispute any of the facts alleged in the administrative co mplaint; he responded to the complaint by requesting an informal hearing which he elected to not attend; and the Commission adopted the uncontested findings of fact in the complaint and imposed a penalty within the authority of sections 1012.795(1)(j) and 1012.796(7), Florida Statutes, even though the penalty exceeded the recommendation by the Department of Education ’s attorney. Appellant asserts, however, that his due process rights were violated because he would have attended the informal hearing had he k nown how harshly some Commission members would characterize his communications which gave rise to the complaint filed against him. We find no support for this due process claim. In these circumstances, whether or not we would have chosen so severe a sanction, this Court is not at liberty to impose its own view of the appropriate penalty. See, e.g. , C abezas v. Corcoran , 293 So. 3d 602, 604 (Fla. 1st DCA 2020) (affirming permanent r evocation of educator’s certificate following informal hearing where penalty was authorized by statute); Gonzalez

- Gomez v. Dep’t of Health , 107 So. 3d 1139, 1140

– 41 (Fla. 3d DCA 2012) (affirming permanent revocation of doctor’s license where the doctor3 did not dispute any of the facts in the administrative complaint and requested an informal hearing before the Board of Medicine ) ; Decola v. Castor , 519 So. 2d 709, 711 (Fla. 2d DCA 1988) (“The EPC found appellant guilty based on the admitted facts stated in t he complaint, and the penalty imposed was within the authority of section 231.28. Thus, this c ourt is not authorized to review the penalty.” ). Affirmed.
<PAGE>


September 7, 2000



Securities and Exchange Commission
450 Fifth Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C.  20549

Dear Sir/Madam:

We have been furnished with a copy of the response to Item 4 of Form 8-K for the
event that occurred on September 6, 2000, to be filed by our former client, MTR
Gaming Group, Inc. We agree with the statements contained in paragraphs (a)(1)
(iii), (iv) and (v) made in response to Item 4 insofar as they relate to our
Firm.


                                                   BDO Seidman, LLP
No. 00-7402.

#### Guillen *v.*Stewart, Director, Arizona Department of Corrections, et al.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(a) AND RULE 15d-14(a)

SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18

OF THE UNITED STATES CODE,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of R. R. Donnelley & Sons Company (the Company) on Form 10-K/A for the period
ending December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Miles W. McHugh, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§ 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|             |  |                                                     
|------------ |  | ----------------------------------------------------
|May 10, 2010 |  | /S/    MILES W.
MCHUGH                              
|             |  | Miles W. McHugh                                     
|             |  | Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
MSI EX 10.55 (2013)


        


Motorola Solutions, Inc.
2014-2016 LRIP Terms


	
						
	Design Feature
	2014-2016 LRIP

	Performance Cycle
	Three years from 2014-2016

	Eligible Population
	CVPs and above

	Performance Criteria
	Relative Total Shareholder Return (TSR)
TSR Defined as:
Ending stock price
   (Daily average during the final three months of the Performance Cycle)
+   Value of reinvested dividends
=   Total ending value
–   Beginning stock price
   (Daily average during the three months preceding the Performance Cycle)
=   Total value created
÷   Beginning share price
   (Daily average during the three months preceding the Performance Cycle)
= Total shareholder return



	Negative TSR Component
	If the resulting TSR performance for Motorola Solutions is negative, the Committee will have negative discretion to reduce the final payout up to a 25% reduction of the calculated payout.

	Comparator Group
	Agilent Technologies Inc.
	 
	NCR Corp.

	 
	Danaher Corp.
	 
	Parker-Hannifin Corp.

	 
	Dover Corp.
	 
	Raytheon Co.

	 
	Eaton Corp.
	 
	Rockwell Automation

	 
	Harris Corp.
	 
	Rockwell Collins, Inc.

	 
	Ingersoll-Rand PLC
	 
	TE Connectivity Ltd.

	 
	 
	 
	Tyco International Ltd.

	Payout Scale




	 
	 
	 
	 
	 

	 
	 
	TSR Rank
	 
	Payout Factor
	 

	 
	 
	1
	 
	200%
	 

	 
	 
	2
	 
	180%
	 

	 
	 
	3
	 
	160%
	 

	 
	 
	4
	 
	140%
	 

	 
	 
	5
	 
	120%
	 

	 
	 
	6
	 
	110%
	 

	 
	 
	7
	 
	100%
	 

	 
	 
	8
	 
	75%
	 

	 
	 
	9
	 
	50%
	 

	 
	 
	10
	 
	25%
	 

	 
	 
	11
	 
	0%
	 

	 
	 
	12
	 
	0%
	 

	 
	 
	13
	 
	0%
	 

	 
	 
	14
	 
	0%
	 







        


        


	
						
	 
	



A comparator company must be publically traded on or after July 1, 2015, to be included in the TSR rank among other companies at the end of the performance cycle.


	 

	

In the event a comparator company stops being publically traded before July 1, 2015, the company will be excluded from the TSR rank at the end of the performance cycle and the payout scale will be adjusted as follows:
	 

	 
	Payout Scale With 12 Comparator Companies:


	 
	Payout Scale With 11 Comparator Companies:



	 
	TSR Rank
	Payout Factor
	 
	TSR Rank
	Payout Factor

	 
	1
	200%
	 
	1
	200%

	 
	2
	180%
	 
	2
	180%

	 
	3
	160%
	 
	3
	160%

	 
	4
	140%
	 
	4
	140%

	 
	5
	120%
	 
	5
	120%

	 
	6
	110%
	 
	6
	100%

	 
	7
	100%
	 
	7
	65%

	 
	8
	65%
	 
	8
	25%

	 
	9
	25%
	 
	9
	0%

	 
	10
	0%
	 
	10
	0%

	 
	11
	0%
	 
	11
	0%

	 
	12
	0%
	 
	12
	0%

	 
	13
	0%
	 
	 
	 

	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 

	 
	 
	

Payout Scale With 10 Comparator Companies:








	 

	 
	 
	TSR Rank
	 
	Payout Factor
	 

	 
	 
	1
	 
	200%
	 

	 
	 
	2
	 
	180%
	 

	 
	 
	3
	 
	160%
	 

	 
	 
	4
	 
	140%
	 

	 
	 
	5
	 
	120%
	 

	 
	 
	6
	 
	100%
	 

	 
	 
	7
	 
	65%
	 

	 
	 
	8
	 
	25%
	 

	 
	 
	9
	 
	0%
	 

	 
	 
	10
	 
	0%
	 

	 
	 
	11
	 
	0%
# C_2015111EN.01000201.xml

| 1.4.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 111/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.4.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 111/2

---

Communication in accordance with Article 12(5)(a) of Council Regulation (EEC) No 2913/92 on the information provided by the customs authorities of the Member States concerning the classification of goods in the customs nomenclature

(2015/C 111/02)

Binding tariff information ceases to be valid from this day if it becomes incompatible with the interpretation of the customs nomenclature as a result of the following international tariff measures:

Amendments to the Harmonised System Explanatory Notes and the Compendium of Classification Opinions, approved by the Customs Cooperation Council (CCC doc. NC2055 — report of the 54th Session of the HS Committee):

AMENDMENTS TO THE EXPLANATORY NOTES TO BE DONE UNDER ARTICLE 8 PROCEDURE OF THE HS CONVENTION AND CLASSIFICATION OPINIONS EDITED BY THE HS COMMITTEE OF THE WORLD CUSTOMS ORGANISATION

AMENDMENTS TO THE EXPLANATORY NOTES TO BE DONE UNDER ARTICLE 8 PROCEDURE OF THE HS CONVENTION AND CLASSIFICATION OPINIONS EDITED BY THE HS COMMITTEE OF THE WORLD CUSTOMS ORGANISATION

(54th SESSION OF THE HSC IN SEPTEMBER 2014)

DOC. NC2055

Amendments of the Explanatory Notes of the Nomenclature annexed to the HS Convention

Amendments of the Explanatory Notes of the Nomenclature annexed to the HS Convention

| 29.37 | O/5 |
| --- | --- |
| 29.41 | O/6 |

29.37

O/5

29.41

O/6

Classification Opinions approved by the HS Committee

Classification Opinions approved by the HS Committee

| 0303.90/1 | O/2 |
| --- | --- |
| 0305.20/1 | O/3 |
| 2009.90/1 | O/4 |
| 3923.10/1-3 | O/7 |
| 3923.90/2-3 | O/8 |
| 6106.20/1 | O/9 |
| 6109.90/1 | O/10 |
| 6110.20/2 | O/11 |
| 6110.30/2-3 | O/12 |
| 6114.30/2 | O/13 |
| 6202.13/1 | O/14 |
| 6202.93/1 | O/15 |
| 7115.90/1 | O/16 |
| 8431.49/2 | O/17 |
| 8433.90/1 | O/18 |
| 8467.19/1 | O/19 |
| 8517.70/3 | O/20 |
| 8536.90/2 | O/21 |
| 8714.10/1 | O/17 |
| 9403.20/3-4 | O/22 |

0303.90/1

O/2

0305.20/1

O/3

2009.90/1

O/4

3923.10/1-3

O/7

3923.90/2-3

O/8

6106.20/1

O/9

6109.90/1

O/10

6110.20/2

O/11

6110.30/2-3

O/12

6114.30/2

O/13

6202.13/1

O/14

6202.93/1

O/15

7115.90/1

O/16

8431.49/2

O/17

8433.90/1

O/18

8467.19/1

O/19

8517.70/3

O/20

8536.90/2

O/21

8714.10/1

O/17

9403.20/3-4

O/22

Information regarding the contents of these measures can be obtained from the Directorate-General for Taxation and Customs Union of the European Commission (rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 200, 1049 Brussels, Belgium) or can be downloaded from the internet site of this Directorate-General:

http://ec.europa.eu/comm/taxation_customs/customs/customs_duties/tariff_aspects/harmonised_system/index_en.htm

---
EX-10.14



 Exhibit 10.14 

FIRST AMENDMENT TO CATTLE SUPPLY AND FEEDING AGREEMENT 

THIS FIRST AMENDMENT TO CATTLE SUPPLY AND FEEDING AGREEMENT (“First Amendment,”) is made and entered into as of
September 21, 2010 by and between JBS Five Rivers Cattle Feeding LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (formerly known as Five Rivers Ranch Cattle Feeding LLC) (“Five Rivers”) and J & F Oklahoma
Holdings Inc., a Delaware corporation (“J & F”). 
 RECITALS 

 

	A.	Five Rivers and J & F have entered into the Cattle Supply and Feeding Agreement dated as of October 23, 2008 (the “Agreement”); 


 

	B.	Five Rivers and J & F desire to amend the Agreement to extend the term past September 10, 2016. 


NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing and the mutual covenants and agreement contained herein, the receipt and sufficiency of
which are hereby acknowledged, the parties hereby agree as follows: 
 Section 1.1. Section 1 of the Agreement is amended by
deleting “October 23, 2011” in the first sentence thereof and replacing it with “September 11, 2016.” 
 Section 1.2. Other
than as set forth in this First Amendment, all provisions of the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect. 
 Section 1.3. The Agreement,
as amended by this First Amendment, constitutes the entire agreement of the parties with respect to the matters set forth in the Agreement, as amended by this First Amendment and supersede any prior understanding or agreement, oral or written, with
respect to such matters. 
 Section 1.4. This First Amendment may be executed in counterparts, each of which will be deemed an original but all
of which together will constitute one and the same instrument. 
 Section 1.5. This First Amendment shall be governed and construed in
accordance with the laws of the State of Colorado without giving effect to any choice or conflict of laws rule or provision that would cause the application of the domestic substantive laws of any other jurisdiction. 

[Signature page follows.] 







 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, J & F and Five Rivers have executed this First Amendment to the Agreement
as of the date first written above. 
  

			
	 J & F:
  

J & F Oklahoma Holdings Inc., a Delaware

corporation

		
	By:	 	 /s/ J. Tom Brink

	Name:	 	J. Tom Brink
	Its:	 	President & COO
	
	 Five Rivers:
  

JBS Five Rivers Cattle Feeding LLC, a
 Delaware limited liability
company

		
	By:	 	 /s/ Mike Thoren

	Name:	 	Mike Thoren
	Its:	 	President & CEO
```

[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 128 (Thursday, July 3, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 38024]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-15704]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[ER-FRL-9015-7]

Environmental Impact Statements; Notice of Availability

    Responsible Agency: Office of Federal Activities, General 
Information (202) 564-7146 or http://www.epa.gov/compliance/nepa/.

Weekly receipt of Environmental Impact Statements
Filed 06/23/2014 Through 06/27/2014
Pursuant to 40 CFR 1506.9.

Notice

    Section 309(a) of the Clean Air Act requires that EPA make public 
its comments on EISs issued by other Federal agencies. EPA's comment 
letters on EISs are available at: http://www.epa.gov/compliance/nepa/eisdata.html.

EIS No. 20140183, Draft EIS, USFS, AZ, Tonto National Forest Travel 
Management, Comment Period Ends: 08/18/2014, Contact: Marianne Thomas 
602-225-5213.
EIS No. 20140184, Final EIS, FAA, CA, Gnoss Field Airport, Proposed 
Extension of Runway 13/31, Review Period Ends: 08/04/2014, Contact: 
Doug Pomeroy 650-827-7612.
EIS No. 20140185, Draft EIS, USFS, AZ, Flagstaff Watershed Protection 
Project, Comment Period Ends: 08/18/2014, Contact: Erin Phelps 928-527-
8240.

    Dated: June 30, 2014.
Dawn Roberts,
Office of Federal Activities.
[FR Doc. 2014-15704 Filed 7-2-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
```
I

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 3858

To extend the suspension of duty on certain diamond tool and drill blanks,

and for other purposes.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

FEBRUARY 10, 1994

Ms. PRYCE of Ohio introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Ways and Means

A BILL

To extend the suspension of duty on certain diamond tool

and drill blanks, and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF TEMPORARY SUSPENSION OF

4 DUTY.

5 Heading 9902.71.04 (relating to certain diamond tool

6 and drill blanks) of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of

7 the United States is amended by striking out ‘‘12/31/92’’

8 and inserting ‘‘12/31/95’’.
2

•HR 3858 IH

1 SEC. 2. EFFECTIVE DATE.

2 (a) IN GENERAL.—The amendment made by this Act

3 applies with respect to articles entered, or withdrawn from

4 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after

5 the date of the enactment of this Act.

6 (b) RELIQUIDATION.—Notwithstanding section 514

7 of the Tariff Act of 1930 or any other provision of law,

8 upon proper request filed with the appropriate customs of9 ficer on or before the 90th day after the date of the enact10 ment of this Act, any entry of an article described in sub11 heading 9902.71.04 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of

12 the United States that was made—

13 (1) after December 31, 1992, and

14 (2) before the date which is 15 days after the

15 date of the enactment of this Act,

16 shall be liquidated or reliquidated as though such entry

17 occurred on or after the date that is 15 days after the

18 date of the enactment of this Act.

Æ