alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2014397EN.01000501.xml

| 12.11.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 397/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.11.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 397/5

---

Annual Report 2013

2014/C 397/06

On 15 September 2014, the European Ombudsman presented her Annual Report for the year 2013 to the President of the European Parliament.

The Annual Report is available on the European Ombudsman’s website in all 24 official languages at: www.ombudsman.europa.eu

Paper copies can be requested free of charge from the European Ombudsman’s office:

| 1 avenue du Président Robert Schuman |
| --- |
| CS 30403 |
| 67001 Strasbourg Cedex |
| FRANCE |
| Tel. +33 388172313 |
| Fax +33 388179062 |
| E-mail: eo@ombudsman.europa.eu |

1 avenue du Président Robert Schuman

CS 30403

67001 Strasbourg Cedex

FRANCE

Tel. +33 388172313

Fax +33 388179062

E-mail: eo@ombudsman.europa.eu

---
EXHIBIT 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. {section} 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Red Jade Holdings Limited (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Jeremy Mork, Chief Executive and Financial  Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. {section} 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes- Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



|Dated:  November 19, 2010
By  /s/ Jeremy Mork
-----------------------------
    Jeremy Mork
    Chief Executive and  Financial Officer
   (Principal Executive and Financial Officer)
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
# C_2013094EN.01000801.xml

| 3.4.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 94/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.4.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 94/8

---

Second call for proposals under Commission Decision C(2010) 7499 laying down criteria and measures for the financing of commercial demonstration projects that aim at the environmentally safe capture and geological storage of CO2 as well as demonstration projects of innovative renewable energy technologies under the scheme for greenhouse gas emission allowances trading within the Community established by Directive 2003/87/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council

2

2013/C 94/07

Notice is hereby given of the launch of the second call for proposals under the above Decision of 3 November 2010.

Proposals are invited for the call. The call deadlines, information on the modalities of the call and the guidance for applicants on how to submit proposals are available through the following European Commission website:

http://ec.europa.eu/clima/funding/ner300/index_en.htm

---
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3752 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 3752

  To amend section 410(b)(1)(A) of the Controlled Substances Act, to 
    provide a mandatory term of life imprisonment without release, 
   probation, parole or suspension of sentencing for drug felons and 
               violent criminals convicted a third time.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 26, 1994

 Mr. Volkmer introduced the following bill; which was referred jointly 
       to the Committees on the Judiciary and Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend section 410(b)(1)(A) of the Controlled Substances Act, to 
    provide a mandatory term of life imprisonment without release, 
   probation, parole or suspension of sentencing for drug felons and 
               violent criminals convicted a third time.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
That section 401(b)(1)(A) of the Controlled Substance Act (21 U.S.C. 
841(b)(1)(A)) is amended by striking ``If any person commits a 
violation of the subparagraph or of section 418, 419 or 420 after two 
or more prior convictions for a felony drug offense have become final, 
such person shall be sentenced to a mandatory term of life imprisonment 
without release'' and inserting ``If any person commits a violation of 
the subparagraph or of section 418, 419, or 420 (21 U.S.C. 859, 860, 
and 861) or a crime of violence after 2 or more prior convictions for a 
felony drug offense or crime of violence or for any combination thereof 
have become final, such person shall be sentenced to a mandatory term 
of life imprisonment without release, probation, parole or suspension 
of sentencing. For purposes of this subparagraph, the term `crime of 
violence' means an offense that is a felony punishable by a maximum 
term of imprisonment of 10 years or more and has as an element the use, 
attempted use, or threatened use of physical force against the person 
or property of another, or by its nature involves a substantial risk 
that physical force against the person or property of another may be 
used in the course of committing the offense.''.

                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 32.2

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Greentech Transportation Industries
Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending January 31, 2011 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Ian B. McAvoy, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this certification as of the
17th day of March, 2011.


/s/ Ian B. McAvoy
------------------------------
Chief Financial Officer
#### Willie DARDEN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 70-770.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Jan. 6, 1971.

Appeal quashed.
# C_2015058EN.01000701.xml

| 18.2.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 58/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.2.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 58/7

---

Commission notice on current State aid recovery interest rates and reference/discount rates for 28 Member States applicable as from 1 March 2015

(Published in accordance with Article 10 of Commission Regulation (EC) No 794/2004 of 21 April 2004 (OJ L 140, 30.4.2004, p. 1))

(2015/C 58/06)

Base rates calculated in accordance with the Communication from the Commission on the revision of the method for setting the reference and discount rates (OJ C 14, 19.1.2008, p. 6). Depending on the use of the reference rate, the appropriate margins have still to be added as defined in this communication. For the discount rate this means that a margin of 100 basispoints has to be added. Commission Regulation (EC) No 271/2008 of 30 January 2008 amending Regulation (EC) No 794/2004 foresees that, unless otherwise provided for in a specific decision, the recovery rate will also be calculated by adding 100 basispoints to the base rate.

Modified rates are indicated in bold.

Previous table published in OJ C 465, 24.12.2014, p. 26.

| From | To | AT | BE | BG | CY | CZ | DE | DK | EE | EL | ES | FI | FR | HR | HU | IE | IT | LT | LU | LV | MT | NL | PL | PT | RO | SE | SI | SK | UK |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1.3.2015 | ... | 0,34 | 0,34 | 2,18 | 0,34 | 0,52 | 0,34 | 0,66 | 0,34 | 0,34 | 0,34 | 0,34 | 0,34 | 1,58 | 2,21 | 0,34 | 0,34 | 0,34 | 0,34 | 0,34 | 0,34 | 0,34 | 2,16 | 0,34 | 2,04 | 0,33 | 0,34 | 0,34 | 1,02 |
| 1.1.2015 | 28.2.2015 | 0,34 | 0,34 | 2,18 | 0,34 | 0,52 | 0,34 | 0,66 | 0,34 | 0,34 | 0,34 | 0,34 | 0,34 | 1,58 | 2,21 | 0,34 | 0,34 | 0,34 | 0,34 | 0,34 | 0,34 | 0,34 | 2,16 | 0,34 | 2,63 | 0,46 | 0,34 | 0,34 | 1,02 |

From

To

AT

BE

BG

CY

CZ

DE

DK

EE

EL

ES

FI

FR

HR

HU

IE

IT

LT

LU

LV

MT

NL

PL

PT

RO

SE

SI

SK

UK

1.3.2015

...

0,34

0,34

2,18

0,34

0,52

0,34

0,66

0,34

0,34

0,34

0,34

0,34

1,58

2,21

0,34

0,34

0,34

0,34

0,34

0,34

0,34

2,16

0,34

2,04

2,04

0,33

0,33

0,34

0,34

1,02

1.1.2015

28.2.2015

0,34

0,34

0,34

0,34

2,18

2,18

0,34

0,34

0,52

0,52

0,34

0,34

0,66

0,66

0,34

0,34

0,34

0,34

0,34

0,34

0,34

0,34

0,34

0,34

1,58

1,58

2,21

2,21

0,34

0,34

0,34

0,34

0,34

0,34

0,34

0,34

0,34

0,34

0,34

0,34

0,34

0,34

2,16

2,16

0,34

0,34

2,63

2,63

0,46

0,46

0,34

0,34

0,34

0,34

1,02

1,02

---
#### Thomas F. BARNES, Jr., Appellant, v. TEN CORPORATION OF ORLANDO, Appellee.

No. 466.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Fourth District.

April 21, 1967.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
#### STATE of Louisiana v. William F. EDGECOMBE.

No. 60436.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Oct. 28, 1977.

In re: William F. Edgecombe applying for writ of certiorari.

Writ refused. The complaints made herein were disposed of in the appeal. See 275 So.2d 740 (La.1973).
<PAGE>   1
                                                                     EXHIBIT 4.4




                              William E. Macaulay
                                  7 Hill Road
                              Greenwich, CT 06830


                                        January 29, 1997



Board of Directors
Weatherford Enterra, Inc.
1360 Post Oak Blvd., Suite 1360
Houston TX 77056
Attn.:  Corporate Secretary

         RE:  AGREEMENT DATED AS OF JUNE 23, 1995

Gentlemen:

         Section 4.2(iii) of the Agreement dated as of June 23, 1995 among
Weatherford International Incorporated ("Weatherford"), American Gas & Oil
Investors, AMGO II, AMGO III, First Reserve Secured Energy Assets Fund, L.P.,
First Reserve Fund V,  L. P., First Reserve Fund V-2, L.P. and First Reserve
Fund VI, L.P. (collectively, the "First Reserve Funds") and First Reserve
Corporation ("FRC", the First Reserve Funds and FRC called the "FRC Group"), a
copy of which is attached hereto and made a part hereof for all purposes (the
"Agreement"), provides that members of the FRC Group may distribute Weatherford
Voting Securities (as defined in the Agreement) to any partner of a First
Reserve Fund; provided that any distributee that is a member of the FRC Group
has signed the Agreement.  Accordingly, I hereby agree to be made a party to
the Agreement and to be bound by the terms of the Agreement.

                                        Very truly yours,

                                        /s/ William E. Macaulay

                                        William E. Macaulay

attachment (1)
<PAGE>   2
                                  John A. Hill
                                  33 Avon Road
                             Bronxville, NY  10708


                                        January 29, 1997


Board of Directors
Weatherford Enterra, Inc.
1360 Post Oak Blvd., Suite 1360
Houston TX 77056
Attn.:  Corporate Secretary

         RE:  AGREEMENT DATED AS OF JUNE 23, 1995

Gentlemen:

         Section 4.2(iii) of the Agreement dated as of June 23, 1995 among
Weatherford International Incorporated ("Weatherford"), American Gas & Oil
Investors, AMGO II, AMGO III, First Reserve Secured Energy Assets Fund, L.P.,
First Reserve Fund V,  L. P., First Reserve Fund V-2, L.P. and First Reserve
Fund VI, L.P. (collectively, the "First Reserve Funds") and First Reserve
Corporation ("FRC", the First Reserve Funds and FRC called the "FRC Group"), a
copy of which is attached hereto and made a part hereof for all purposes (the
"Agreement"), provides that members of the FRC Group may distribute Weatherford
Voting Securities (as defined in the Agreement) to any partner of a First
Reserve Fund; provided that any distributee that is a member of the FRC Group
has signed the Agreement.  Accordingly, I hereby agree to be made a party to
the Agreement and to be bound by the terms of the Agreement.

                                        Very truly yours,

                                        /s/ John A. Hill

                                        John A. Hill

attachment (1)
# C_2015366EN.01000301.xml

| 5.11.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 366/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.11.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 366/3

---

Commission information notice pursuant to Article 17(5) of Regulation (EC) No 1008/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council on common rules for the operation of air services in the Community

Invitation to tender in respect of the operation of scheduled air services in accordance with public service obligations

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2015/C 366/03)

| Member State | Republic of Croatia |
| --- | --- |
| Route(s) concerned | Dubrovnik – Zagreb – Dubrovnik
  Split – Zagreb – Split
  Zagreb – Zadar – Pula – Zadar – Zagreb
  Zagreb – Brač – Zagreb
  Osijek – Dubrovnik – Osijek
  Osijek – Split – Osijek
  Osijek – Zagreb – Osijek
  Osijek – Pula – Split – Pula – Osijek
  Osijek – Rijeka – Osijek
  Rijeka – Split – Dubrovnik – Split – Rijeka |
| Period of validity of the contract | 27 March 2016 – 28 March 2020 |
| Deadline for submission of tenders | 60 days from the publication of the this notice |
| Address where the text of the invitation to tender and any relevant information and/or documentation related to the public tender and the public service obligations can be obtained | Ministry of Maritime Affairs, Transport and Infrastructure |
| Directorate General of Civil Aviation, Electronic Communications and Postal Services |
| Prisavlje 14 |
| 10000 Zagreb |
| REPUBLIC OF CROATIA |
| Tel. +385 16169060 |
| Fax +385 16196393 |
| Email: PSO@caacro.hr |

Member State

Republic of Croatia

Route(s) concerned

Dubrovnik – Zagreb – Dubrovnik

Split – Zagreb – Split

Zagreb – Zadar – Pula – Zadar – Zagreb

Zagreb – Brač – Zagreb

Osijek – Dubrovnik – Osijek

Osijek – Split – Osijek

Osijek – Zagreb – Osijek

Osijek – Pula – Split – Pula – Osijek

Osijek – Rijeka – Osijek

Rijeka – Split – Dubrovnik – Split – Rijeka

Period of validity of the contract

27 March 2016 – 28 March 2020

Deadline for submission of tenders

60 days from the publication of the this notice

Address where the text of the invitation to tender and any relevant information and/or documentation related to the public tender and the public service obligations can be obtained

Ministry of Maritime Affairs, Transport and Infrastructure

Directorate General of Civil Aviation, Electronic Communications and Postal Services

Prisavlje 14

10000 Zagreb

REPUBLIC OF CROATIA

Tel. +385 16169060

Fax +385 16196393

Email: PSO@caacro.hr

---
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04

- 1 4

- 00 777

- CV

Cynthia BAEZA

, Appellant

v.

Floyd ZAHN and Helen Zahn

, Appellee s

From the 218th Judicial Di strict Court, Atascosa County, Texas

Trial Court No. 1 3

- 07

- 0622

- CVA

Honorable Donna S. Rayes, Judge Presiding

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

Patricia O. Alvarez , Justice

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

Delivered and Filed: December 3

, 2014

DISMISSED

Appellant has filed a motion to dismiss this appeal. The motion contains a certificate of

service to appellee s, who ha ve not opposed the motion. Therefore, we grant the motion and

dismiss the appeal. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 42.1(a)(1). Cos ts of the appeal are taxed against the party

who incurred them.

PER CURIAM
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

March 24, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice
135531 Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, Justices

v SC: 135531 COA: 273444 Wayne CC: 06-006525-01 BEATRICE TAYLOR, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application fo r leave to appeal the November 29, 2007 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

l0317 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

March 24, 2008

Clerk
#### Ortland BODIE, Appellant, v. OSTEOPATHIC GENERAL HOSPITAL, etc., et al., Appellees.

No. 70-253.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Dec. 22, 1970.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
#### E. W. WRIGHT, as Tax Collector, of Dade County, Florida, Sam L. Elcook, as Tax Assessor of Dade County, Florida, and Ray E.. Green as Comptroller of the State of Florida, Appellants, v. REYNOLDS FASTENERS, INC., a New York corporation, Appellee.

No. 65-674.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Third District.

May 10, 1967.

Thomas C. Britton, County Atty., and Stuart Simon, Asst. County Atty., for appellants.

Kenneth N. ReKant and George Gilbert, 'Miami Beach, for appellee.

Before HENDRY, C. J., and PEARSON and BARKDULL, JJ.

ORDER ON MANDATE

PER CURIAM.

Whereas, the judgment of this court was entered on March 22, 1966 (184 So.2d 699) reversing the summary final decree of the Circuit Court of Dade County, Florida, with directions to dismiss the cause; and

Whereas, on review of this court’s judgment, by certiorari, the Supreme Court of Florida, by its opinion and judgment filed March 22, 1967 (197 So.2d 295) and mandate dated April 25, 1967, now lodged in this court, affirmed this court’s judgment as modified by the said opinion and judgment of the Supreme Court of Florida;

Now, therefore, It is Ordered that the mandate of this court issued in this cause on April 20, 1966 is withdrawn, the opinion and judgment of this court filed in this cause on March 22, 1966, insofar as it is in conflict with or fails to conform to the views expressed in the opinion and judgment of the Supreme Court of Florida dated March 22, 1967, aforesaid, is withdrawn and vacated, and the said opinion and judgment of the Supreme Court of Florida is herewith made the opinion and judgment of this court. The opinion and judgment of this court, except as withdrawn and vacated is adhered to. Costs allowed shall be taxed in the circuit court (Rule 3.16(b) Florida Appellate Rules, 31 F.S.A.).
EERE Information Center Search Help More Search Options

Printable Version 

## Walk-In Coolers and Walk-In Freezers Test Procedure Rulemaking This page presents information on the proposed test procedures and rulemakings for walk-in coolers and freezers.
Section 312(c) of the Energy Independence and Security Act (EISA) ( PDF 1.0 MB ) amends section 343(a) of the Energy Policy and Conservation Act of 1975 (EPCA) (42 U.S.C. 6314(a)) by adding subsection 343(a)(9) (42 U.S.C. 6314(a)(9)), which establishes test procedure definitions for walk-in coolers and freezers. It also directs the Secretary of Energy to establish test procedures to measure the energy use of this equipment. Download Adobe Reader

. The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) will develop test procedures and energy conservation standards for walk-in coolers and freezers under separate rulemakings, which will proceed concurrently. DOE expects the final rule for the test procedure rulemaking to be issued before the notice of proposed rulemaking (NOPR) for energy conservation standards is issued.
DOE test procedures may reference portions of test procedures and definitions from relevant sources, such as those developed by the American Society of Heating, Refrigerating, and Air-Conditioning Engineers; the Air-Conditioning, Heating and Refrigeration Institute; the American Society for Testing and Materials; and the American National Standards Institute.


### Test Procedure Walk-In Coolers and Freezers Test Procedure Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (coming soon)



### Contact Information Charles Llenza Project Manager (202) 586-2192

Printable Version 

### Appliances and Commercial Equipment Standards: Walk-In Coolers and ... http://www1.eere.energy.gov/buildings/appliance_standards /commercial...

1 of 2 1/23/2009 10:05 A M 

### EERE-2008-BT-TP-0014 COMMENT 01Building Technologies Program Home | EERE Home | U.S. Department of Energy Webmaster | Web Site Policies | Security & Privacy| USA.gov

Content Last Updated: 01/16/2009 

### Appliances and Commercial Equipment Standards: Walk-In Coolers and ... http://www1.eere.energy.gov/buildings/appliance_standards /commercial...

2 of 2 1/23/2009 10:05 A M 

### EERE-2008-BT-TP-0014 COMMENT 01
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 21.1



                    Subsidiaries of Digital:Convergence Corporation


DigitalDemographics.:Com Inc., a Delaware corporation

DCCP Inc., a Delaware corporation

Net Talk Interactive, Inc., a Texas corporation

Dynamite Acquisition Corp., a Delaware corporation
#### SENTRY INSURANCE COMPANY, and Hardware Mutual Casualty Company, Appellants, v. JAMES A. KNOWLES, INC., Appellee.

No. 69-648.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Jan. 6, 1971.

Rehearing Denied Jan. 29, 1971.

John T. Allen, Jr., of Harrison, Greene, Mann, Davenport, Rowe & Stanton, St. Pe-tersburg, for appellants.

Charles S. Carrere, of Roney, Ulmer, Woodworth & Jacobs, St. Petersburg, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. *See*New Amsterdam Casualty Company v. Addison, Fla.App.1964, 169 So.2d 877; Miller Electric Company of Fla. v. Employers’ Liability Assurance Corporation, Fla.App.1965, 171 So.2d 40; Aetna Insurance Company v. Stevens, Fla.App. 1970, 229 So.2d 601.

PIERCE, C. J., and LILES and MANN, JJ., concur.
1 In The



### Court of Appeals

Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

____________________

NO

. 09

- 1 4

- 00 076

- C V



### ____________________

STEVEN SMITH

, Appellant

V.

LDC, LLC , Appellee

_______________________________________________________ ______________

On A ppeal from the 359th District Court

Montgomery County, Texas

Trial Cause No

. 12

- 10

- 10700 CV

________________________________________________________ _____________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

The appellant, Steven Smith , filed a motion to dismiss this appeal. The

motion is voluntarily made by the appellant prior to any decision of this Court. See

Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(1). No other party filed notice of appeal. We grant the

motion and dismiss the appeal.

APPEAL DISMIS SED.2 ______________________________ LEANNE JOHNSON

Justice

Opinion Delivered May 8, 2014

Before McKeithen, C.J., Horton and Johnson, JJ.