alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                          23,932
<SECURITIES>                                    48,960
<RECEIVABLES>                                   10,056
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                88,800
<PP&E>                                          21,486
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (7,846)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 104,452
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           10,102
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            34
<OTHER-SE>                                      94,316
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   104,452
<SALES>                                         51,289
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                51,289
<CGS>                                           28,600
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   28,600
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                46,521
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,940
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (20,892)
<INCOME-TAX>                                        50
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (20,942)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.93)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.93)


</TABLE>
#### Ronald B. BRADFORD, Petitioner, v. Louie L. WAINWRIGHT, Director, Division of Corrections, Respondent.

No. 71-916.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Nov. 5, 1971.

Habeas corpus denied.
# Welfare
Exhibit 32.01  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Quarterly Report of DMH International, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Jon-Marc Garcia, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:  (1)        The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2)        The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.     /s/ Jon-Marc Garcia By: Jon-Marc Garcia Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer  Dated: May 16, 2011  A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
# C_2013125EN.01000102.xml

| 1.5.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 125/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.5.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 125/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.6893 — Carl Zeiss/Carl Zeiss Vision)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2013/C 125/02

On 23 April 2013, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32013M6893. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32013M6893. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.

---
FILED U.S. COURT OF AP P EALS E LEVEN T HC IRC U IT NOVEMB ER 6, 2007 THOMAS K. KAH

N CLERK [ DO NO T P UB L I S H] I N THE UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS F O R T H E E L E V E N T H C IR C U IT

________________________ N o. 05- 15323 N on -A rgum entC al endar

________________________ D . C. D o c k e tN o . 8 9 - 0 6 1 0 1 - CR- J CP U N I T E D S T A T E S O F A M E R I C A , P la in tif f - A p p e lle e , v ersu s P A U L A L E B O R D , a .k .a . P au l T a llin i, D e f e n d a n t- A p p e lla n t.

________________________ A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt f orthe S outhe rn D i s tr i c tof F l or i da

_________________________ ( N ove m b e r 6, 2007) B efo re A N D E R S O N , B L A C K an d B A R K E T T , C i rcu i tJu d g es. P E R C U R I A M:2

F e d e r a l p r is o n e rP au l A le b o r d ap p e a ls th e d is tr ic t c o u r t’s o r d e rd e n y in g h is m ot i on t o m odi f

y hi s s e nt e nc e , pur s ua ntt o 18 U . S . C . § 3582( c ) ( 2) . I n 1990, A l eb o rd w as co n v i ct ed o f o n e co u n to f p o ssessi o n w i th i n t en tt o d i stri b u t e atl east f i ve ki l ogr a m s of

c oc a i ne , i n vi ol a t i on of 21 U . S . C . §§ 841( a ) ( 1) a nd ( 2) , a nd se nt ence d t o 3 60 m on ths’ i m pri sonm ent , i n acc ordance w i th the then-m andat ory S ent enci ng G ui del i nes provi si on s. A l ebord con t ends he shou l d b e r es ent ence d because the S up re m e C ou rtsubsequent l y hel d the S ent enci ng G ui del i nes are a dvi s ory i n U

ni ted Stat es v. B oo ke r , 12 5 S . C t . 73 8 (20 05 ). W i th l i m i t e d e xc e pt i ons , adi s tr i c tc our tm a y notm odi f y at e rm of i m pri sonm enton ce i thas bee n i m po se d. O ne except i on i s “ i n the ca se of a de f e nda ntw ho ha s be e n s e nt e nc e d t o at e rm of i m pr i s onm e ntba s e d on a s e nt e nc i ng r a nge tha tha s s ubs e que nt l y be e n l ow e r e d by the S e nt e nc i ng C om m i s s i on pur s ua ntt o 28 U . S . C . § 994( o) , ” w he r e , “ upon m ot i on of the de f e nda nt. . . the c ourtm a y r e duc e the t e rm of i m pr i s onm e nt. . . i f

s uc h a r e duc t i on i s c ons i s t e ntw i th appl i c abl e pol i c y s t a t e m e nt s i s s ue d by the S e nt e nc i ng C o m m is s io n .” 1 8 U .S .C . § 3 5 8 2 ( c ) ( 2 ) . W e pr e vi ous l y he l d B oo ke ri s nota r etroac t i vel y app l i cabl e G ui del i nes a m e ndm e ntby the S e nt e nc i ng C om m i s s i on, a nd i s notagr ound on w hi c h a d e f e n d a n t’s s e n te n c e c a n b e r e d u c e d p u r s u a n t to § 3 5 8 2 ( c ) ( 2 ) . U ni ted Stat es v.3

Mor e no , 421 F . 3d 1217, 1220 ( 11th C i r . 2005) . T hus , the di s tr i c tc our tdi d not ab u s e its d is c r e tio n b y d e n y in g A le b o r d ’s m o tio n to m o d if y h is s e n te n c e . Se e i d. at 1 2 1 9 ( r e v ie w in g ad is tr ic t c o u rt’s d e c is io n n o t to r e d u c e as e n te n c e p u r s u a n t to § 3 58 2(c) (2) f

or abuse of di sc re t i on ). AF F I RME D.
EXHIBIT 32.1  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Quarterly Report of WTTJ Corp. (the "Registrant") on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Peter Klamka, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.  Dated:  January 18, 2011  /s/ Peter Klamka Peter Klamka President, Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer) & Chief Financial Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3770 Reported in House (RH)]

                                                 House Calendar No. 147

103d CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 3770

                          [Report No. 103-457]

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 To designate the United States courthouse located at 940 Front Street 
  in San Diego, California, and the Federal building attached to the 
     courthouse as the ``Edward J. Schwartz Courthouse and Federal 
                              Building''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                             March 24, 1994

        Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed

                                                 House Calendar No. 147
103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 3770

                          [Report No. 103-457]

 To designate the United States courthouse located at 940 Front Street 
  in San Diego, California, and the Federal building attached to the 
     courthouse as the ``Edward J. Schwartz Courthouse and Federal 
                              Building''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 2, 1994

  Ms. Schenk introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
              Committee on Public Works and Transportation

                             March 24, 1994

        Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To designate the United States courthouse located at 940 Front Street 
  in San Diego, California, and the Federal building attached to the 
     courthouse as the ``Edward J. Schwartz Courthouse and Federal 
                              Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The United States courthouse located at 940 Front Street in San 
Diego, California, and the Federal building attached to the courthouse 
shall be known and designated as the ``Edward J. Schwartz Courthouse 
and Federal Building''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the courthouse and Federal building 
referred to in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the 
``Edward J. Schwartz Courthouse and Federal Building''.
```
<PAGE>   1

                                                                   EXHIBIT 12-22

                           THE DETROIT EDISON COMPANY
                COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                           Year Ended December 31
                                                          ------------------------------------------------------
                                                                1999                1998                1997
                                                                ----                ----                ----

                                                                       (Millions, except for ratio)
<S>                                                      <C>                <C>                <C>
Net income.............................................   $           434    $            418    $           417
                                                          ---------------    ----------------    ---------------

Taxes based on income:
   Current income taxes................................               282                 280                308
   Deferred taxes - net................................               (60)                 (5)                (6)
   Investment tax credit adjustments - net.............               (11)                (15)               (14)
   Municipal and state.................................                 3                   3                  4
                                                          ---------------    ----------------    ---------------
     Total taxes based on income.......................               214                 263                292
                                                          ---------------    ----------------    ---------------

Fixed charges:
   Interest on long-term debt..........................               252                 254                262
   Amortization of debt discount, premium
     and expense.......................................                17                  11                 11
   Other interest......................................                19                  13                  9
   Interest factor of rents............................                34                  34                 34
                                                          ---------------    ----------------    ---------------
     Total fixed charges...............................               322                 312                316
                                                          ---------------    ----------------    ---------------

Earnings before taxes based on income
   and fixed charges...................................   $           970    $            993    $         1,025
                                                          ===============    ================    ===============

Ratio of earnings to fixed charges.....................              3.01                3.18               3.24

</TABLE>
I

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 3824

To amend the Agricultural Adjustment Act of 1938 to revise the reserve

stock level for burley tobacco, to increase the amount of scrap tobacco

permitted to be marketed, and to authorize the lease and transfer of

burley tobacco quotas between farms in adjacent counties in the State

of Virginia under certain circumstances.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

FEBRUARY 9, 1994

Mr. BOUCHER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Agriculture

A BILL

To amend the Agricultural Adjustment Act of 1938 to revise

the reserve stock level for burley tobacco, to increase

the amount of scrap tobacco permitted to be marketed,

and to authorize the lease and transfer of burley tobacco

quotas between farms in adjacent counties in the State

of Virginia under certain circumstances.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 3824 IH

1 SECTION 1. REVISION OF RESERVE STOCK LEVEL FOR

2 BURLEY TOBACCO.

3 (a) REVISION.—Section 301(b)(14)(D) of the Agri4 cultural Adjustment Act of 1938 (7 U.S.C.

5 1301(b)(14)(D)) is amended—

6 (1) in clause (i), by striking ‘‘50,000,000

7 pounds’’ and inserting ‘‘100,000,000 pounds’’; and

8 (2) in clause (ii), by striking ‘‘15 percent’’ and

9 inserting ‘‘20 percent’’.

10 (b) APPLICATION OF AMENDMENTS.—The amend11 ments made by subsection (a) shall apply with respect to

12 marketing years for burley tobacco beginning after the

13 date of the enactment of this Act.

14 SEC. 2. INCREASE IN ALLOWABLE FLOOR SWEEPINGS OF

15 TOBACCO.

16 Section 314A(d)(2) of the Agricultural Adjustment

17 Act of 1938 (7 U.S.C. 1314–1(d)(2)) is amended by strik18 ing ‘‘0.24 per centum’’ and inserting ‘‘0.72 percent’’.

19 SEC. 3. LEASE AND TRANSFER OF BURLEY TOBACCO

20 QUOTAS BETWEEN FARMS IN ADJACENT

21 COUNTIES IN VIRGINIA.

22 Section 319 of the Agricultural Adjustment Act of

23 1938 (7 U.S.C. 1314e) is amended—

24 (1) in the second sentence of subsection (l)—

25 (A) by striking ‘‘States’’ and inserting

26 ‘‘State’’; and
3

•HR 3824 IH

1 (B) by striking ‘‘and Virginia’’; and

2 (2) by adding at the end the following new sub3 section:

4 ‘‘(m) TRANSFER BETWEEN ADJACENT COUNTIES.—

5 Notwithstanding any other provision of this section, the

6 Secretary may permit the lease and transfer of a burley

7 tobacco quota from one farm in a county in the State of

8 Virginia to any other farm in an adjacent county in that

9 State if a majority of active burley tobacco producers with10 in the State approve such lease and transfer by a state11 wide referendum to be conducted by the Secretary.’’.

Æ
# C_2015161EN.01000801.xml

| 14.5.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 161/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.5.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 161/8

---

Notice of the impending expiry of certain anti-dumping measures

(2015/C 161/06)

1.   As provided for in Article 11(2) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009 of 30 November 2009 on protection against dumped imports from countries not members of the European Community (1), the Commission gives notice that, unless a review is initiated in accordance with the following procedure, the anti-dumping measures mentioned below will expire on the date mentioned in the table below.

1

2.   Procedure

Procedure

Union producers may lodge a written request for a review. This request must contain sufficient evidence that the expiry of the measures would be likely to result in a continuation or recurrence of dumping and injury.

Should the Commission decide to review the measures concerned, importers, exporters, representatives of the exporting country and Union producers will then be provided with the opportunity to amplify, rebut or comment on the matters set out in the review request.

3.   Time limit

Time limit

Union producers may submit a written request for a review on the above basis, to reach the European Commission, Directorate-General for Trade (Unit H-1), CHAR 4/39, 1000 Brussels, Belgium (2) at any time from the date of the publication of the present notice but no later than three months before the date mentioned in the table below.

2

4.   This notice is published in accordance with Article 11(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009.

| Product | Country(ies) of origin or exportation | Measures | Reference | Date of expiry (3) |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Okoumé plywood | The People’s Republic of China | Anti-dumping duty | Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 82/2011 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of okoumé plywood originating in the People’s Republic of China (OJ L 28, 2.2.2011, p. 1). | 3.2.2016 |

Product

Country(ies) of origin or exportation

Measures

Reference

Date of expiry (3)

3

Okoumé plywood

The People’s Republic of China

Anti-dumping duty

Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 82/2011 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of okoumé plywood originating in the People’s Republic of China (OJ L 28, 2.2.2011, p. 1).

3.2.2016

---

(1)  OJ L 343, 22.12.2009, p. 51.

1

(2)  Fax +32 22956505.

2

(3)  The measure expires at midnight of the day mentioned in this column.

3

---
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Cindy MESSMER.

No. 54072.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Dec. 19, 1973.

In re: The State of Louisiana, through the Department of Public Safety, Division of State Police applying for writ of certio-rari.

Writ denied. The ruling of the trial court is correct.
EXHIBIT 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. {section} 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of China Highlands Limited (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Jeremy Mork, Chief Executive and Financial  Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. {section} 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes- Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



|Dated:  November 19, 2010
By  /s/ Jeremy Mork
-----------------------------
    Jeremy Mork
    Chief Executive and  Financial Officer
   (Principal Executive and Financial Officer)
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
Exhibit 32.1


                          CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND
                          CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                          PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

      In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q
      of Big Time Acquisition,Inc. for the quarter ending November 29,
      2010, I, Scot A. Scheer, CEO and CFO of Big Time Acquisition
      hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
      pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to
      the best of my knowledge and belief, that:

           1.  Such quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending
               November 29, 2010, fully complies with the requirements
               of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
               of 1934; and

           2.  The information contained in such quarterly Report on Form
               10-Q for the quarter ended April 30, 2010, fairly represents
               in all material respects, the financial condition and results
               of operations of Big Time Acquisition, Inc.

     Dated:  January 14, 2011



     Big Time Acquisition, Inc.

     By: /s/ Scot A. Scheer
         -------------------
          CEO and CFO
# UnitedStates Court of A ppea ls F OR T H E D IST RIC TOF C OL U MBI A C IR C U IT

_________

___ 

### N o. 08- 1127 S ept em berTer m 2007 EPA-7 3FR4312 F il ed O n : Ma y

2, 2008 Ut il ity Ai r Reg ula tor

y Group, Peti ti oner v . E n viro n m e n t a l P ro t e c t io n A ge n cy, Res pondent

_______ 08- 1129 Air Liq uide Ame rica Specia lty Gases LL C, Peti ti oner v . E n viro n m e n t a l P ro t e c t io n A ge n cy, Res pondent O R D E R Upo n c onsi derati on of the moti on fil ed by peti ti oners i n the abov e- capt ion ed cases to hold case s in abeyance , it is OR DE RE D , on the c our t’ s o w n moti on, t hat t he abov e- capt ion ed c ases be conso lidate d. It is FU RT HE R OR DE RE D thatthe moti on to hol d i n abey ance be g ra nted, and thes e c ases be h eld i n abey ance pendi ng furth er order of the c our

t. Peti ti oners a re di re cte d to file a s tatus repor t 90 day s from the date of this order
. The par ti es are di re cte d to file moti ons to g ov er n furt her proceed ing s n o l ater

than 180 day s from the date of this order
. FOR THE C OURT: Mark J. Langer, Clerk B Y : / s / Sabr ina M . C ri sp Depu ty Clerk