alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit12.2**

 

**ManagementCertification under Section 302 of Sarbanes Oxley:**

 

I, Jeffrey Speed, Chief Financial Officer of Euro DisneyS.A.S. (the “Management Company”), certify that:

 

1.             I have reviewed thisannual report on Form 20-F of Euro Disney S.C.A. (the “Company”);

 

2.             Based on myknowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3.             Based on myknowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the Company as of, and for,the periods presented in this report;

 

4.             TheCompany’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the company and have:

 

(a)   Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, orcaused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to the Company, includingits consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;

 

(b)   Evaluated the effectiveness of the Company’sdisclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusionsabout the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of theend of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

 

(c)   Disclosed in this report any change in the Company’sinternal control over financial reporting that occurred during the periodcovered by the annual report that has materially affected, or is reasonablylikely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financialreporting; and

 

5.             The Company’s othercertifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation ofinternal control over financial reporting, to the Company’s auditors and theaudit committee of the Company’s board of directors (or persons performingequivalent functions):

 

(a)   Allsignificant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the Company’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and

 

(b)   Any fraud,whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

 

Date:                    January10, 2005

 

 
|   | By:    | /s/ Jeffrey Speed       |
|--------|--------|-------------------------|
|   | Name:  | Jeffrey Speed           |
|   | Title: | Chief Financial Officer |

 

1

----
constituted a continuing violation, such that the time for bringing his 

claims had not expired, rendering dismissal on the bases advanced by 

respondents improper. The district court ultimately granted the motion 

and dismissed the case, holding that appellant had not filed a timely 

administrative claim and that he likewise had not filed any grievances 

pertaining to the claims at issue in his complaint. This appeal followed. 

As directed, respondents have filed a response. 

In the present matter, the district court's order dismissing 

appellant's complaint contains no findings regarding the alleged threats of 

retaliation that appellant argues rendered the grievance process 

unavailable to him, and thus, does not address the impact of these alleged 

threats on his failure to exhaust his administrative remedies in 

accordance with NRS 41.0322(1). The challenged order also fails to 

address appellant's assertion that the removal of interest from his 

accounts constituted a continuing violation and whether that argument 

renders any of the various administrative claim forms included in the 

record timely and properly submitted, such that appellant may have 

complied with the requirements of NRS 209.243(1). Having reviewed the 

documents before us, including the civil proper person appeal statement 

and response thereto, we conclude that the district court's failure to make 

adequate findings and otherwise fully address these points in its dismissal 

order has left us unable to determine whether, under the circumstances 

presented here, dismissal of the underlying complaint was warranted. See 

Buzz Stew, LLC v. City of N. Las Vegas, 124 Nev. 224, 228, 181 P.3d 670, 

672 (2008) (concluding that a "complaint should be dismissed only if it 

appears beyond a doubt that [the plaintiff] could prove no set of facts, 

which, if true, would entitle [him or her] to relief'). Accordingly, we 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 2 

(0) 1947A zeto 
reverse the district court's dismissal of the underlying action and remand 

this matter for further proceedings. 

It is so ORDERED. 1 

Hardesty 

f ocR J. 

Douglas 

Cherry 

cc: Hon. Susan Johnson, District Judge 

Percy Lavae Bacon 

Attorney General/Carson City 

Eighth District Court Clerk 

'The clerk of this court is directed to file appellant's January 11, 

2013, response to respondents' opposition to his request to file an errata. 

In light of this order, all other requests for relief pending in this matter 

are denied as moot. 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 3 

(0) I947A
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

IN THE INTEREST OF: A.L.

PETITION OF: A.G., NATURAL MOTHER :

:

:

:

: No. 177 WAL 2019

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court

IN THE INTEREST OF: M.G.

PETITION OF: A.G., NATURAL MOTHER :

:

:

:

: No. 178 WAL 2019

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 11th day of July, 2019

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED

.
EXHIBIT 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. {section} 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Red Jade Holdings Limited (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Jeremy Mork, Chief Executive and Financial  Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. {section} 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes- Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



|Dated:  March 1, 2012
By  /s/ Jeremy Mork
-----------------------------
    Jeremy Mork
    Chief Executive and  Financial Officer
   (Principal Executive and Financial Officer)
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Stephen J. Markman Chief Justice

Robert P. Young, Jr.,

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano 

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 February 24, 2017

Order 

Clerk

February 24, 2017

154527(110)

COALITION PROTECTING AUTO NO-FAULT,

MARTHA E. LEVANDOWSKI, GERALD E. 

CLARK, MARY ELLEN CLARK, A. MICHAEL

DELLER, PAULINA M. DELLER and M. THOMAS

DELLER,

Plaintiffs-Appellants, and

BRAIN INJURY ASSOCIATION OF

MICHIGAN, ILENE IKENS, RICHARD IKENS,

KENNETH WISSER, SUSAN WISSER,

GREGORY WOLFE and KAREN WOLFE, Plaintiffs-Appellees, SC: 154527

v COA: 314310

Ingham CC: 12-000068-CZ

MICHIGAN CATASTROPHIC CLAIMS

ASSOCIATION, Defendant-Appellee. 

_________________________________________/

On order of the Chief Justice, the motion of Outside Legal Counsel, PLC, and 

attorney Philip L. Ellison to participate as amici curiae and to file an amicus brief in 

support of the application for leave to appeal is GRANTED. The amicus brief submitted 

on January 25, 2017, is accepted for filing.
No. 72-6279.

#### Smith *v.*Rodgers, Jail Superintendent.

C. A. D. C. Cir. Certiorari denied.
254 La. 794

#### Mrs. Lena M. AMACKER, Individually and as Natural Tutrix of, for and on behalf of the Minor, Betty Jo Amacker v. Edgar W. KIRBY and The Travelers Indemnity Company.

No. 50035.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Oct. 14, 1969.

In re: Mrs. Lena M. Amacker, individually and as natural tutrix of, for and on behalf of the minor, Betty Jo Amacker, applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, Parish of East Baton Rouge. 224 So.2d 18.

Writ refused. On the facts found by the Court of Appeal we find no error of law in its judgment.
Exhibit: 32.1

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of The Singing Machine Company, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-K for the period ended March 31, 2005 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Yi
Ping Chan, the Interim Chief Executive Officer and Chief Operating Officer of
the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

            (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
      or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

            (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
      material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
      Company.

                                        /s/ Yi Ping Chan
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Yi Ping Chan
                                        Interim Chief Executive Officer and
                                        Chief Operating Officer
                                        (Principal Executive Officer)

Date: June 28, 2005
I

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 3725

To reduce the amounts appropriated to the Department of Education to

increase grants to State and local educational agencies and to reduce

the Federal budget deficit.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JANUARY 25, 1994

Mr. KING introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee

on Education and Labor

A BILL

To reduce the amounts appropriated to the Department of

Education to increase grants to State and local

educational agencies and to reduce the Federal budget

deficit.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Education Bureauc5 racy Reduction Act’’.

6 SEC. 2. TRANSFER OF FUNDS.

7 (a) REDUCTION OF PERSONNEL.—For the two-year

8 period beginning in fiscal year 1995, from the amounts
2

•HR 3725 IH

1 appropriated to the Department of Education, the Sec2 retary of Education shall decrease the personnel costs at

3 such Department by 10 percent.

4 (b) TRANSFER OF FUNDS.—(1) 90 percent of the

5 savings from such reduction shall be transferred to local

6 educational agencies in accordance with State aid distribu7 tion formulas to such local agencies; and

8 (2) 10 percent of the savings from such reduction

9 shall be used to reduce the Federal budget deficit.

10 (c) STATE AND LOCAL FUNDING LEVELS.—Nothing

11 in this Act shall be construed to replace or reduce funding

12 for education programs by the States and units of local

13 government.

Æ
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS FOR INDEPENDENCE TAX CREDIT PLUS L.P. III AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                              APR-1-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                       6,422,601
<SECURITIES>                                 1,300,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               608,331
<PP&E>                                      85,827,948
<DEPRECIATION>                               8,939,838
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              86,067,310
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        9,873,110
<BONDS>                                     44,560,867
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                  31,633,333
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                86,067,310
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             5,873,889
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             7,557,416
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,779,791
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (3,483,318)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (3,474,187)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (79.18)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3571 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3571

      To amend the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971 to limit 
          expenditures in House of Representatives elections.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           November 19, 1993

 Mr. Pomeroy introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                   Committee on House Administration

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
      To amend the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971 to limit 
          expenditures in House of Representatives elections.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. LIMITATION ON EXPENDITURES IN HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 
              ELECTIONS.

    Section 315 of the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971 (2 U.S.C. 
441a) is amended by adding at the end the following new subsection:
    ``(i) A candidate for the office of Representative in, or Delegate 
or Resident Commissioner to, the Congress may not make expenditures 
with respect to an election for such office, which, in the aggregate, 
exceed $300,000.''.

SEC. 2. EFFECTIVE DATE.

    The amendment made by section 1 shall take effect on the date on 
which mandatory limitations on campaign expenditures are held to be 
constitutional by the Supreme Court.

                                 <all>
```
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

ATIBA MAYFIELD

,

Defendant Below,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF DELAWARE

,

Plaintiff Below,

Appellee. §

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§ No. 546, 2016

Court Below: Superior Court

of the State of Delaware

ID

. No. 1504011040A (N

Submitted: November 15, 2017

Decided: December 4 , 2017

Before STRINE , Chief Justice ; VAUGHN

, and SEITZ , Justices.

O R D E R

This 4 th day of December 2017, the Court having considered this matter after

oral argument and on the briefs filed by the parties has determined that the final

judgment of the Superior Court should be affirmed on the basis of and for the reasons

assigned by the Superior Court in its rulings at the trial Prayer Conference conducted

on June 22, 2016.

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the judgment of the

Superior Court be, and the same hereby is, AFFIRMED

.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ James T. Vaughn, Jr.

Justice
MPI 3058 Research Drive 

State College, Pennsylvania 16801 USA 

Telephone: +1.814.272.1039 

RESEARC H Fax: +1.814.231.1580 

April 01. 2011 

Mr. Tony Ellis 

US EPA - Headquarters 

Office of Civil Enforcement 

Room 5041 A, Ariel Rios South Building 

1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW 

Washington, DC 20004 

Subject: TSCA-HQ-2004-0016, RCRA-HQ-2004-0016. TSCA-HQ-2005-5001 SEP A 

Fluorotelomer-Based Product Biodegradation Testing (Characterization Work) - Progress 

Report 

Dear Mr. Ellis, 

Enclosed is the MPI Research Technical Progress Report in support of the subject 

characterization work, in hard copy and in CD format. This document was 

prepared pursuant to Characterization laboratory Exhibit A: Scope of Work, 

Section 4f. The CD submitted contains the Progress Report. 

If you have any questions or require further information please contact me at 814-

272-1039x4261. 

Sincerely, 

Paul Connolly 

Study Director 

cc: Daniel J. Wright - Director Analytical Sciences, MPI Research 

Robert J. Tucker - DuPont Chemicals and Fluoroproducts
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

March 23, 2016

p0316 

# Order

Clerk March 23, 2016

153069

In re AWG, Minor. SC: 153069

COA: 327976

Kent CC Family Division:

15

- 025970

- AD

_______________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the December 29, 2015

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not

persuaded that the question presente d should be reviewed by this Court.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Commerce

###### National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

          - RIN 0648-XG406

# AGENCY:

National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.

# ACTION:

Notice of cancellation of a public meeting.

# SUMMARY:

The Mid-Atlantic Fishery Management Council (MAFMC) has cancelled its Surfclam and Ocean Quahog Advisory Panel (AP) meeting that was scheduled on Wednesday, September 5, 2018, from 10 a.m. to 4 p.m.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Christopher M. Moore, Ph.D., Executive Director, Mid-Atlantic Fishery Management Council, telephone: (302) 526-5255.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The initial notice for this public meeting published in the                     **Federal Register**                     on August 13, 2018 (83 FR 39988). The purpose of this meeting was for the Surfclam and Ocean Quahog AP to provide feedback on the Public Hearing Document for the Surfclam and Ocean Quahog Excessive Shares Amendment.                

Dated: August 17, 2018.

Tracey L. Thompson,

Acting Deputy Director, Office of Sustainable Fisheries, National Marine Fisheries Service.

[FR Doc. 2018-18136 Filed 8-22-18; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE 3510-22-P
#### George K. REECH v. William J. BODIN, Jr. et al.

No. 54311.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Feb. 1, 1974.

In re: George K. Reech, applying for Certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, Parish of East Baton Rouge. 286 So.2d 477.

Application denied. On the facts found by the Court of Appeal, the result is correct.
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court 

Lansing, Michigan 

October 14, 2005 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

126121 & (51) Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

NATIONAL WINE & SPIRITS, INC., Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman, NWS MICHIGAN, INC., and Justices NATIONAL WINE & SPIRITS, L.L.C., 

Plaintiffs-Appellants, 

v SC: 126121 

 COA: 243524 

Ingham CC: 02-000013-CZ

STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Defendant-Appellee, 

and 

MICHIGAN BEER & WINE 

WHOLESALERS ASSOCIATION, 

Intervening Defendant-Appellee. 

_________________________________________/ 

By order of December 27, 2004, the application for leave to appeal was held in 

abeyance pending the decision in Granholm v Heald, 541 US 1062; 124 S Ct 2389; 158 L 

Ed 2d 962 (2004). On order of the Court, the opinion having been issued on May 16, 

2005, Granholm v Heald, 544 US ; 125 S Ct 1885; 161 L Ed 2d 796 (2005), the 

application for leave to appeal the March 25, 2004 judgment of the Court of Appeals is 

again considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.302(G)(1), we direct the Clerk to schedule oral 

argument on whether to grant the application or take other peremptory action permitted 

by MCR 7.302(G)(1). The parties may file supplemental briefs within 28 days of the 

date of this order, but they should avoid submitting a mere restatement of the arguments 

made in their application papers. The motion to strike is DENIED as moot. 

s1010 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

October 14, 2005 

Clerk
'«iUI:R P.O:BOX 12308,' CAPITOL STATION AUSTIN, TEXAS 78711 tf«fc£$ LLiSi 

### OFFICIAL BUSINESS STATE OF TEXAS PENALTYFOR PRIVATE USE


### RE: WR-80,826-02 QUIRINO MACHIN SANCHEZ MOORE (MTC) - TDC #1665404 

# .^P\

=3* PITNEY BOWES 

## 02-1M . '. $ 0Q.406 0004279596 JAN 29 2015 MAILED FROM ZIP CODE 78 701
#### Raymond SCOTT, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. Q-484.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Feb. 20, 1973.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
#### Jay MORTON, Appellant, v. Leo GELVAN, Appellee.

No. 66-653.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Third District.

April 25, 1967.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.