alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 3791

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide an exemption

from the gas guzzler tax for automobiles that are lengthened by certain

small manufacturers.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

FEBRUARY 3, 1994

Mr. JEFFERSON introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Ways and Means

A BILL

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide

an exemption from the gas guzzler tax for automobiles

that are lengthened by certain small manufacturers.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. EXEMPTION FROM GAS GUZZLER TAX FOR

4 AUTOMOBILES THAT ARE LENGTHENED BY

5 CERTAIN SMALL MANUFACTURERS.

6 (a) GENERAL RULE.—Paragraph (5) of section

7 4064(b) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (defining

8 manufacturer) is amended by adding at the end the follow9 ing new subparagraphs:
2

•HR 3791 IH

1 ‘‘(C) EXCEPTION FOR CERTAIN SMALL

2 MANUFACTURERS.—Notwithstanding subpara3 graph (B), a person shall not be treated as a

4 manufacturer of any automobile if—

5 ‘‘(i) such person would (but for this

6 subparagraph) be so treated solely by rea7 son of lengthening an existing automobile,

8 and

9 ‘‘(ii) such person is a small manufac10 turer (as defined in subparagraph (D)) for

11 the model year in which such lengthening

12 occurs.

13 ‘‘(D) SMALL MANUFACTURER DEFINED.—

14 ‘‘(i) IN GENERAL.—For purposes of

15 this paragraph, the term ‘small manufac16 turer’ means any manufacturer—

17 ‘‘(I) who manufactured (whether

18 or not in the United States) fewer

19 than 10,000 automobiles in the sec20 ond model year preceding the model

21 year for which the determination

22 under subparagraph (C) is being

23 made, and

24 ‘‘(II) who can reasonably be ex25 pected to manufacture (whether or
3

•HR 3791 IH

1 not in the United States) fewer than

2 10,000 automobiles in the model year

3 for which the determination under

4 subparagraph (C) is being made.

5 ‘‘(ii) SPECIAL RULE.—For purposes of

6 clause (i)—

7 ‘‘(I) MANUFACTURER.—The

8 meaning of the term ‘manufacturer’

9 shall be determined without regard to

10 subparagraphs (A) and (C).

11 ‘‘(II) CONTROLLED GROUPS.—

12 Person who are members of the same

13 controlled group of corporations shall

14 be treated as one manufacturer. For

15 purposes of the preceding sentence,

16 the term ‘controlled group of corpora17 tions’ has the meaning given to such

18 term by section 1563(a); except that

19 ‘more than 50 percent’ shall be sub20 stituted for ‘at least 80 percent’ each

21 place it appears in section 1563(a).’’

22 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by

23 subsection (a) shall take effect on the date of the enact24 ment of this Act.

Æ
No. 00-7393.

#### Feliverty *v.*Varner, Superintendent, State Correctional Institution at Dallas.

C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

Inconnection with Amendment No. 2 to the Quarterly Report of ABC Acquisition Corp 1502 (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q/A for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),I, Nitin Amersey, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adoptedpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to myknowledge:

 

|   | (1) | The Report fully complies  with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange  Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

|   | (2) | The information contained  in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial  condition and results of operations of the Company as of the date and for the  periods expressed in the Report. |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

| /s/ Nitin Amersey       |
|-------------------------|
| Nitin Amersey           |
| Chief Executive Officer |
|                    |
| February 1, 2011        |

 

 

 

The foregoing certification is being furnished solelypursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and is not being filed as part of the Reportor as a separate disclosure document.

 

 

----
# C_2015319EN.01000501.xml

| 26.9.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 319/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.9.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 319/5

---

Information communicated by Member States regarding closure of fisheries

(2015/C 319/07)

In accordance with Article 35(3) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1224/2009 of 20 November 2009 establishing a Community control system for ensuring compliance with the rules of the common fisheries policy (1), a decision has been taken to close the fishery as set down in the following table:

1

| Date and time of closure | 1.9.2015 |
| --- | --- |
| Duration | 1.9-31.12.2015 |
| Member State | Ireland |
| Stock or Group of stocks | COD/07A |
| Species | Cod (Gadus morhua) |
| Zone | VIIa |
| Type(s) of fishing vessels | — |
| Reference number | 41/TQ104 |

Date and time of closure

1.9.2015

Duration

1.9-31.12.2015

Member State

Ireland

Stock or Group of stocks

COD/07A

Species

Cod (Gadus morhua)

Gadus morhua

Zone

VIIa

Type(s) of fishing vessels

—

Reference number

41/TQ104

---

(1)  OJ L 343, 22.12.2009, p. 1.

1

---
### Page 1 of 3 **Disposition Comments Docket No:**  

### FAA - 20 09 - 0 218 SNPRM **Directorate ID:** 

### 20 09 - CE - 0 0 6 - AD Originating Office Tracking No.: 

### NO COMMENTS RECEIVED

– If this box is checked, no s ignatures are required. 

### Has the reference d service information been revised since the NPRM was issued? I f ye s, list latest revision and attach a cop y. Note that changes beyond the scope of the previously published NPRM will require a new notice. Contact the Directorate focal point for guidance. Instructions: Summarize all comments **by issue** (not by commenter) and provide your recommended resolution of each issue. **All comments relating to the sam e issue should be discussed together.**  Do not list all of the issues from one commenter together. If changes to the AD are required based on the comments received, explain why and describe in detail what change(s) you recommend. Reference FAA - IR- M - 8040.1C Chapter 9. **ISSUE 1:** Select one o

f the following : If other, explain : Commenter(s): What change to the AD action is requested? Why is the change requested or how is it justified? Do we agree? If **YES,** we agree because Make the fol lowing changes to the AD: If **PARTIALLY AGREE** , we agree with because We disagree with because

Make the following changes to the AD: If **NO** , we don’t agree because **ISSUE 2**  **:** Select one of the following :

If other, explain : Commenter(s): What change to the AD action is requested? Why is the change requested or how is it justified? Do we agree? If **YES,** we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: If **PARTIALLY AGREE** , we agree with because We disagree with because Make the following changes to the AD: If **NO** , we don’t agree because

### Page 2 of 3

**For additional issues, double -**  **click here** 

### Page 3 of 3 **S ignature Section**  Signature indicates concurrence with this action. Originating Office Tracking No.:
**ASE Date** 

**Branch Manager Date**
### In The C ou rt o f A p p ea ls Si x t h Appe l l at e Di st r i c t o f Te x as a t Te x ar ka na

______________________________ No . 0 6- 07 -0 02 05 -C R

______________________________ CARL OS A. BI RDOW, J R., Appellant

V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
On Appea l from the 336th J udicial District Court

Fa nnin County , Texas Trial Court No. 22207

B e f o r e M o r r i s s , C
. J. , C a

rt e r a n d M o s e l e y , JJ. Memorandum Opinion by J ustice Carte rThis appea l is a companion appe al involving the sa me appe llant to our cause number 06-07- 1 00206-CR (trial court number 22208). The c lerk' s rec ord in cause number 06-07- 00205-CR (trial court number

22207) conta ins the judgme nt and plea ag ree ment for tria l court ca use number 22208, and the r ecor d in cause number 06-07- 00206-CR (trial court number 22208) contains the judgment a nd ple a a g re e me nt fo r tr ia l court nu mbe r 222 07
. An a pp e llate c ourt may take jud ic ia l no tic e of its ow n r e c or ds in t

he sam e or rela te d p ro c e e din g s in vo lvi ngthe same or ne a rl y the same pa

rt ie s. Fl e tc he r v . S

tat e , 2 14 S.W. 3d

5, 7 ( Te x. Cr im. Ap p. 20 07 ); Hu ffm an v . S

tat e , 4 7 9 S
. W
. 2 d 62, 68 (T e x. Cr im. Ap p. 19 72 ). Th e re fo re , we take jud ic ia l noti c e of the re c or ds in bot h c a us e nu mbe rs . The ne g otiated plea a g ree ment in this case demonstrates that Birdow ' s waiver of appe al was 2 done knowing ly , voluntarily , and intellige ntly
. See E x parte De laney , 207 S.W. 3d 79 4 ( Te x. Cr im. App. 2006) ("On e wa y

to indicate that the wa iver wa s knowing and intellige nt is for the ac tual punishment or maxi mum punishm ent to have been determined by a plea ag ree ment when the w aiver was made .")
. 2 MEMORANDUM OPI

NI ON Carlos A. Birdow , J r., has f iled a notice of

appea l from his conviction pursuant to a neg otiated plea a g ree ment of the off ense of ag g ravated assault with a de adly wea pon. We ha ve now r ece ived the cle rk' s rec ord in this appeal. On our re view of that rec ord, we 1 note that the trial c ourt' s cer tificati o n af

fi rm ati vely

states this "is a plea -bar g ain ca se, and the de fe nd a nt h a s NO ri ght o f app eal " and "t he d efen dan t h as w aiv ed t he ri ght o f app eal ." Unless a c ertifica

tion, showing that a defe ndant has the rig ht of appe al, is in the rec ord, we
mus t di smi ss t

he a pp e a l. See T EX . R. A PP . P. 25.2(d). B eca use the trial c ourt' s cer

tification aff irmatively

shows Birdow

has no rig ht of appe al, and be cause the rec ord befor e us does not ref lect that the ce rtification is incorr ect, see De ar s v . S tat e , 154 S.W .3d 610, 615 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005),
we mus t di smi ss t

he a pp e a l. 23

We dismi ss the appea l for wa nt of jurisdiction.

J ack Ca rter J ustice Date Submitted: April 9, 2008 Date D ecide d: April 10, 2008 Do No t Pu

bli sh
# C_2018224EN.01020301.xml

| 27.6.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 224/203 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.6.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 224/203

---

P8_TA(2016)0461

EU-Micronesia Agreement on the short-stay visa waiver ***

European Parliament legislative resolution of 1 December 2016 on the draft Council decision on the conclusion, on behalf of the Union, of the Agreement between the European Union and the Federated States of Micronesia on the short-stay visa waiver (09780/2016 — C8-0388/2016 — 2016/0098(NLE))

(Consent)

(2018/C 224/41)

The European Parliament,

The European Parliament

| — | having regard to the draft Council decision (09780/2016), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the draft Council decision (09780/2016),

| — | having regard to the draft agreement between the European Union and the Federated States of Micronesia on the short-stay visa waiver (09779/2016), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the draft agreement between the European Union and the Federated States of Micronesia on the short-stay visa waiver (09779/2016),

| — | having regard to the request for consent submitted by the Council in accordance with Article 77(2)(a) and Article 218(6), second subparagraph, point (a)(v), of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (C8-0388/2016), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the request for consent submitted by the Council in accordance with Article 77(2)(a) and Article 218(6), second subparagraph, point (a)(v), of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (C8-0388/2016),

| — | having regard to Rule 99(1), first and third subparagraphs, Rule 99(2), and Rule 108(7) of its Rules of Procedure, |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to Rule 99(1), first and third subparagraphs, Rule 99(2), and Rule 108(7) of its Rules of Procedure,

| — | having regard to the recommendation of the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs (A8-0337/2016), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the recommendation of the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs (A8-0337/2016),

| 1. | Gives its consent to conclusion of the agreement; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Gives its consent to conclusion of the agreement;

| 2. | Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council, the Commission and the governments and parliaments of the Member States and of the Federated States of Micronesia. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council, the Commission and the governments and parliaments of the Member States and of the Federated States of Micronesia.

---
EXHIBIT 23.1


                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS


     We have issued our report dated February 15, 2002, accompanying the
consolidated financial statements included in the Annual Report of OSE USA, Inc.
(Formerly Integrated Packaging Assembly Corporation) on Form 10-K for the two
years ended December 31, 2001. We hereby consent to the incorporation by
reference of said report in the Registration Statements of OSE USA, Inc.
(Formerly Integrated Packaging Assembly Corporation) on Forms S-8 (Numbers
333-49365, 333-30457, 333-05571 and 333-88341).



/s/ GRANT THORNTON LLP

San Jose, California
March 29, 2002




                                       54
# C_2018091EN.01004501.xml

| 9.3.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 91/45 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.3.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 91/45

---

P8_TA(2016)0284

EU-Monaco agreement on the automatic exchange of financial account information *

European Parliament legislative resolution of 23 June 2016 on the proposal for a Council decision on the conclusion, on behalf of the European Union, of the Amending Protocol to the Agreement between the European Community and the Principality of Monaco providing for measures equivalent to those laid down in Council Directive 2003/48/EC (COM(2016)0201 — C8-0157/2016 — 2016/0109(NLE))

(Consultation)

(2018/C 091/09)

The European Parliament,

The European Parliament

| — | having regard to the proposal for a Council decision (COM(2016)0201), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the proposal for a Council decision (COM(2016)0201),

| — | having regard to the draft Amending Protocol to the Agreement between the European Community and the Principality of Monaco providing for measures equivalent to those laid down in Council Directive 2003/48/EC, |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the draft Amending Protocol to the Agreement between the European Community and the Principality of Monaco providing for measures equivalent to those laid down in Council Directive 2003/48/EC,

| — | having regard to Article 115 and Article 218(6), second subparagraph, point (b), and paragraph (8), second subparagraph, of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament (C8-0157/2016), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to Article 115 and Article 218(6), second subparagraph, point (b), and paragraph (8), second subparagraph, of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament (C8-0157/2016),

| — | having regard to Rules 59, 108(7) and 50(1) of its Rules of Procedure, |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to Rules 59, 108(7) and 50(1) of its Rules of Procedure,

| — | having regard to the report of the Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs (A8-0206/2016), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the report of the Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs (A8-0206/2016),

| 1. | Approves conclusion of the Amending Protocol to the Agreement; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Approves conclusion of the Amending Protocol to the Agreement;

| 2. | Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council, the Commission and the governments and parliaments of the Member States and of the Principality of Monaco. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council, the Commission and the governments and parliaments of the Member States and of the Principality of Monaco.

---
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 97-20310

 

KELVIN WASHINGTON,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

HCA HEALTH SERVICES OF TEXAS, INC.,

doing business as HCA Spring Branch Medical Center,

Defendant-Appellant.

 

Appeal from the United States District Court 

for the Southern District of Texas

 

December 22, 1999

ON REMAND FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

Before POLITZ, GARWOOD and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

This Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) case, in which

plaintiff-appellee Kelvin Washington claims that defendantappellant, HCA Health Services of Texas, Inc. (the Hospital),

terminated his employment because of his disability, is now before

us again on remand from the United States Supreme Court.

The Hospital filed a motion for summary judgment contending

that Washington did not have a disability as defined in the ADA, 42

U.S.C. § 12102(2), because his condition, Adult Stills Disease, was

effectively controlled by medication. The district court denied

the motion, ruling that for purposes of determining whether
2

Washington met the definition of disability in section 12102(2)(A)-

section 12102(2)(B) and (C) being deemed not to be in issue–his

condition should be evaluated in its unmedicated, rather than

medicated, state, and that in his unmedicated state he was disabled

within the meaning of section 12102(2)(A) or at the least presented

an issue of fact in that respect. The district court certified its

order for appeal under 28 U.S.C. § 1292(b) on the ground that it

involved a controlling question of law as to which there was a

substantial ground for difference of opinion, namely whether for

purposes of section 12102(2)(A) Washington’s condition should be

evaluated in its unmedicated or medicated state. We granted the

Hospital’s petition for leave to appeal the district court’s order,

and we subsequently affirmed the district court’s denial of the

Hospital’s motion for summary judgment, agreeing with the district

court that Washington’s condition should be evaluated in its

unmedicated state for purposes of section 12102(2)(A). Washington

v. HCA Health Services of Texas, Inc., 152 F.3d 464 (5th Cir.

1998).

The Supreme Court granted the Hospital’s petition for writ of

certiorari, vacated the judgment of this Court and remanded the

case to this Court “for further consideration in light of Sutton v.

United Air Lines, Inc., 527 U.S. ____, 119 S.Ct. 1752, ___ L.Ed.2d

____ (1999), and Murphy v. United Parcel Service, Inc., 527 U.S.

___, 119 S.Ct. 2133, ____L.Ed.2d ____ (1999).” HCA Health Services

of Texas, Inc. v. Washington, 119 S.Ct. 2388, 2389 (1999).

We therefore now vacate our prior ruling and judgment, and we
3

vacate the referenced order of the district court denying the

Hospital’s motion for summary judgment, and we remand the case to

the district court for further consideration and proceedings in

light of and consistent with Sutton and Murphy.

VACATED AND REMANDED
Exhibit 10.1


 


JOINT FILING AGREEMENT PURSUANT TO
RULE 13d-1(k)


 


The
undersigned acknowledge and agree that the foregoing statement on Schedule 13G is filed on behalf of each of the undersigned in
the capacities set forth below. The undersigned acknowledge that each shall be responsible for the timely filing of such amendments,
and for the completeness and accuracy of the information concerning it contained therein, but shall not be responsible for the
completeness and accuracy of the information concerning the others, except to the extent it knows or has reason to believe that
such information is inaccurate. This Joint Filing Agreement may be executed in any number of counterparts and all of such counterparts
taken together shall constitute one and the same instrument.


 


Date:
February 14, 2014


 


	 	THE K2 PRINCIPAL FUND, L.P.
	 	 	 
	 	By:	K2 GENPAR L.P., its General Partner
	 	 	 
	 	By:	K2 GENPAR 2009 INC., its General Partner
	 	 	 
	 	By:	/s/ Shawn Kimel
	 	 	Shawn Kimel
	 	 	President
	 	 	 
	 	K2 GENPAR, L.P.
	 	 
	 	By:  K2 GENPAR 2009 INC., its General Partner
	 	 	 
	 	By:	/s/ Shawn Kimel
	 	 	Shawn Kimel
	 	 	President
	 	 	 
	 	K2 GENPAR 2009 INC.
	 	 	 
	 	By:	/s/ Shawn Kimel
	 	 	Shawn Kimel
	 	 	President
	 	 	 
	 	SHAWN KIMEL INVESTMENTS, INC.
	 	 	 
	 	By:	/s/ Shawn Kimel
	 	 	Shawn Kimel
	 	 	President
	 	 	 
	 	 	 
	 	/s/ Shawn Kimel
	 	Shawn Kimel, in his individual capacity
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
COMPANY'S CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AS OF AND FOR THE QUARTER ENDED JUNE
30, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                           1,577
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    6,237
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,079
<INVENTORY>                                      5,359
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                14,030
<PP&E>                                          14,969
<DEPRECIATION>                                   5,074
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  25,160
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           10,550
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             1
<OTHER-SE>                                       5,784
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    25,160
<SALES>                                         10,774
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                10,774
<CGS>                                            8,201
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    8,201
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 2,008
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  63
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    583
<INCOME-TAX>                                        62
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                410
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       410
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.08
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.08


</TABLE>