alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### GULF STATES UTILITIES COMPANY v. Clifton O. BINGHAM.

No. 6930.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana. First Circuit.

March 13, 1967.

Rehearing Denied April 17, 1967.

F. W. Middleton, Jr., of Taylor, Porter, Brooks, Fuller & Philips, Baton Rouge, for appellant.

Victor A. Sachse, of Breazeale, Sachse & Wilson, Baton Rouge, Wilton T. McCay, Jr., of Sanders, Miller, Downing, Rubin & Kean, Baton Rouge, for appellees.

Before LOTTINGER, REID and SAR-TAIN, JJ.

LOTTINGER, Judge.

This is a suit for expropriation filed by Gulf States Utilities Company as petitioner against Clifton O. Bingham as defendant. The Lower Court rendered judgment in favor of petitioner and against defendant, granting the servitude sought, and awarding defendant the sum of $29,070.00, with interest, for the servitude and damages. The petitioner has taken this appeal.

*107For purposes of trial below, this suit was consolidated with two other suits, namely, Gulf States Utilities Company v. Moore et al., 197 So.2d 100, No. 6928 on the docket of this Court, and the same petitioner v. Moore, 197 So.2d 106, No. 6929 on the docket of this Court. All three of these consolidated suits were considered in our reasons for judgment which was this day rendered in the matter entitled Gulf States Utilities Company v. Moore et al.

For the reasons this day assigned in the matter entitled Gulf States Utilities Company v. Moore et al., the judgment of the Lower Court will he affirmed, all costs of this appeal to be paid by petitioner.

Judgment affirmed.
Exhibit 32.1  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), the undersigned officer of 3Pea International, Inc., a Nevada corporation (the "Company"), does hereby certify, to the best of his knowledge, that:  1.     The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2011 (the "Report") of the Company complies in all material respects with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and  2.     The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  /s/ Mark Newcomer  Mark Newcomer, Chief Executive Officer (principal executive officer)  Date:  May 13, 2011
<PAGE>




                                                                     EXHIBIT 21


                       SUBSIDIARIES OF G&K SERVICES, INC.

G&K Services, Co. (incorporated in Minnesota, U.S.A.)

G&K Services Linen, Co. (incorporated in Minnesota, U.S.A.)

Northwest Linen Co. (incorporated in Minnesota, U.S.A.)

Gross Industrial Towel & Garment Service, Inc. (incorporated in Minnesota,
 U.S.A.)

G&K Services of Canada, Inc. (incorporated in Ontario, Canada)

912489 Ontario Limited (incorporated in Ontario, Canada)

Work Wear Corporation of Canada, Ltd. (incorporated in Ontario, Canada)

La Corporation Work Wear du Quebec (incorporated in Quebec, Canada)

Whistle Kleen Enterprises Ltd. (incorporated in Ontario, Canada)



                      (THIS SPACE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK)




























                                                                             27
EXHIBIT 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. {section} 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Summer Highlands Limited (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending December 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Jeremy Mork, Chief Executive and Financial  Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. {section} 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes- Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



|Dated:  February 14, 2011
By  /s/ Jeremy Mork
-----------------------------
    Jeremy Mork
    Chief Executive and  Financial Officer
   (Principal Executive and Financial Officer)
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
EXHIBIT 24.1
 ENERGY FOCUS INC.
 2009 ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K
 Power of Attorney
    /s/ Joseph G. Kaveski
    
    /s/ Nicholas G. BerchtoldJoseph G. Kaveski
    
    Nicholas G. BerchtoldChief Executive Officer and Director
    
    Vice President of Finance and Chief Financial OfficerPrincipal Executive Officer
    
    Principal Financial and Accounting Officer/s/ John M. Davenport
    
    /s/ R. Louis SchneebergerJohn M. Davenport
    
    R. Louis SchneebergerPresident and Director
    
    Director/s/ Michael A. Kasper
    
    /s/ Paul von PaumgarttenMichael A. Kasper
    
    Paul von PaumgarttenDirector
    
    Director/s/ David N. Ruckert
    
    /s/ Philip E. WolfsonDavid N. Ruckert
    
    Philip E. WolfsonDirector
    
    Director/s/ J. James Finnerty
    
    /s/ David AnthonyJ. James Finnerty
    
    David AnthonyDirector
    
    Director
#### STATE of Louisiana ex rel. Leandries SAMUELS v. C. Murray HENDERSON, Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary, et al.

No. 54163.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Feb. 1, 1974.

In re: Leandries Samuels applying for writs of certiorari and habeas corpus.

Order for court to transcribe proceedings issued. See Order.

On considering the petition of the relator in the above entitled and, numbered cause.

Ordered that the Honorable Oliver P. Schulingkamp, Judge, Section “F” of the Criminal District Court for the Parish of Orleans issue the necessary orders to procure the transcription of the proceedings in this matter as held in the district court, docket No. 202,396, before February 11, 1974. (Evidence in habeas corpus proceeding)
# C_2014350EN.01000501.xml

| 4.10.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 350/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.10.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 350/5

---

Opinion of the Advisory Committee on Restrictive Practices and dominant position given at its meeting of 28 April 2014 regarding a draft decision relating to Case COMP/AT.39939 — Samsung — Enforcement of UMTS standard essential patents

Rapporteur: Bulgaria

(2014/C 350/06)

| 1. | The Advisory Committee agrees with the Commission’s assessment in its draft decision as communicated to the Advisory Committee on 11 April 2014 under Article 102 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union and Article 54 of the EEA Agreement. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The Advisory Committee agrees with the Commission’s assessment in its draft decision as communicated to the Advisory Committee on 11 April 2014 under Article 102 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union and Article 54 of the EEA Agreement.

| 2. | The Advisory Committee agrees with the Commission that the proceedings can be concluded by means of a decision pursuant to Article 9(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1/2003. |
| --- | --- |

2.

The Advisory Committee agrees with the Commission that the proceedings can be concluded by means of a decision pursuant to Article 9(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1/2003.

| 3. | The Advisory Committee agrees with the Commission that the commitments offered by Samsung are suitable, necessary and proportionate in order to address the concerns expressed by the Commission in its Statement of Objections. |
| --- | --- |

3.

The Advisory Committee agrees with the Commission that the commitments offered by Samsung are suitable, necessary and proportionate in order to address the concerns expressed by the Commission in its Statement of Objections.

| 4. | The Advisory Committee agrees with the Commission that, in light of the commitments offered by Samsung, there are no longer grounds for action by the Commission, without prejudice to Article 9(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1/2003. |
| --- | --- |

4.

The Advisory Committee agrees with the Commission that, in light of the commitments offered by Samsung, there are no longer grounds for action by the Commission, without prejudice to Article 9(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1/2003.

| 5. | The Advisory Committee recommends the publication of its opinion in the Official Journal of the European Union. |
| --- | --- |

5.

The Advisory Committee recommends the publication of its opinion in the Official Journal of the European Union.

Official Journal of the European Union

---
#### John William LAWSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. O-260.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

June 29, 1971.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND

CHIEF
FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT
TO

18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In
connection with the quarterly Report of Vantage mHealthcare, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
March 31, 2015 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Joseph C. Peters, Chief Executive
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:



|1. | The
    Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                                                                                                                            
|-- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                             
|2. | The
    information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the consolidated financial condition of the
    Company as of the dates presented and the consolidated result of operations of the Company for the periods presented.



|By:    | /s/ Joseph
    C. Peters                 | 
|------ | ---------------------------------------- | 
|Name:  | Joseph C. Peters                         | 
|Title: | Principal Executive
    Officer,         | 
|       | Principal Financial Officer and Director | 
|Date:  | May 15, 2015                             | 



This certification
has been furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
## ADJUSTING THE FREEZER DRAWER LEVEL

1. Locate the height-adjuster ( 1 ) in the freezer drawer. Unscrew the 8 Phillips screws ( 2 ) slighUy to loosen the door.



### 2. Loosen the controller screw ( 3 ) with 

### a Phillips 

### SCr9'Ndriver (+).


### 3. Find the best level to align the door slope. 

### • After adjustment,

tighten the 

### controlier screw and then the philips screws.

Example) The slope is about O.08inch (2mm) as shown below,

- Rotate the height adjuster to -2.0 to reduce the door slope. 

## INSTALLING THE WATER DISPENSER LINE A 

## water dispenser with a filter is one of the helpful features on your new refrigerator. To help promote better health, the water filter removes unwanted particles from your water. However, 

### it does not sterilize or destroy microorganisms. You may need to purchase a water purifying system to do that. 

### In order for the 

### ice maker to operate property, a water pressure of 

### 20-125 psi is required. Under nonnal conditions, a 170 cc (S.7S oz.) cup can 

### be filled in about 10 seconds. If the refrigerator is installed in an area with low water pressure (below 20psij, you can install 

### a booster pump to compensate for the low pressure. After you have connected the water line, make sure the water storage tank inside the refrigerator is properly filled. To do this, press the water dispenser lever until the water runs from the water outlet. 

### fU?l Water line installation kits are available at extra 

### ll::.J cost from your dealer. We recommend using a water line installation kit that contains copper tubing and 

### 1A**~** compression nut. 

### Connecting to the water supp ly li ne 

# ,.**>~""o"'.**

# ___**~**

2. Locate the nearest cold water drinking line and 

### install the pipe clamp and shut off valve. Cold water line___ 

# +-

Shut off valve 

### 3. Connect the water line installation kit to the shut off valve. Cold wat&f" l in. __ 

# + Water lin. installation kit Pipe c lamp Shut off valve
setting up

_09
EXHIBIT 32.1

SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Veritas DGC Inc. (the "Company") for the year ended July 31, 2004 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Form 10-K"), I, Thierry Pilenko, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
Section 1350 of Chapter 6 of Title 18 of the United States Code, that:

1.     The
Form 10-K fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;

2.     The
information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

|April 29, 2005                                            |  | 
|--------------------------------------------------------- |  | 
|/s/THIERRY PILENKOThierry Pilenko
Chief Executive Officer |  | 

A
signed original of this written statement required by Rule 13a-14(b) has been provided to Veritas DGC Inc. and will be retained by Veritas DGC Inc. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---



QuickLinks
p. 1 

# OAR Box 1147 Prepped by Ollie Stewart



### Document

Number: 

# 207 ) IV-E-8 1 Docket Number: 

# A-87-1 1

Printed 4/22/20082:42:58PM

Sheet 207 of 242P. 2

# Q \

UNITE D STATE S ENVIRONMENTA L PROTECTIO N AGENC Y I SwJ Z ? WASHINGTON , D.C. 2046 0 

### OE C 

### | 2 

### 198 8 OFFIC E O F AI R AN D RAOIATIQ N
MEMORANDU

M TO : Docke t A-85-2 1 Docke t A-87-1 1 rr 

### /A£.<%r

t 

### r^ FROM : Donal d E . Zinger , Assistan t Director , Offic e o f Mobil e Source s O n Decembe r 2 , 198 8 representative s o f the petroleu m industr yme t wit h EPAAdministrato r Le e Thoma s t o discus s matter s relate d t o EPA' s refueling an d volatilit yrulemakings . Attendee s fro

mth e petroleu

mindustrywere : Messrs . Renna , McMillan , O'Keef e an d Himmelstein . I n additio n t o Administrato r Le e Thomas , othe r EPArepresentative s a t th e meeting were : Ms . LaRoc k an d Messrs . Clay , Quinn an d Zinger .
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 3522

To suspend until January 1, 1996, the duty on certain machinery.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

NOVEMBER 17, 1993

Mr. COBLE introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee

on Ways and Means

A BILL

To suspend until January 1, 1996, the duty on certain

machinery.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. DUTY SUSPENSIONS ON CERTAIN MACHINERY.

4 Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized Tar5 iff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting

6 in numerical sequence the following new headings:

‘‘ 9902.84.52 Roto autocoro textile spinning machinery (provided

for in subheading

8445.20.00) .......... Free No change No change On or before

12/31/95

9902.84.53 Rotary screen print

machinery (provided for in subheading

8443.50.00) .......... Free No change No change On or before

12/31/95
2

•HR 3522 IH

9902.84.54 Airjet weaving machines and accessories of a width

exceeding 30 cm

(provided for in

subheading

8446.30.00) .......... Free No change No change On or before

12/31/95

9902.84.55 Projectile looms of

a width exceeding

30 cm (provided

for in subheading

8446.30.00) .......... Free No change No change On or before

12/31/95 ’’.

1 SEC. 2. APPLICABILITY.

2 (a) IN GENERAL.—The amendment made by section

3 1 applies with respect to goods entered, or withdrawn from

4 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after

5 the date of the enactment of this Act.

6 (b) RETROACTIVE PROVISION.—Notwithstanding sec7 tion 514 of the Tariff Act of 1930 or any other provision

8 of law to the contrary, upon a request filed with the appro9 priate customs officer within 195 days after the date of

10 the enactment of this Act, any entry or withdrawal from

11 warehouse for consumption of goods to which the amend12 ment made by section 1 applies—

13 (1) that was made after December 31, 1992,

14 and before the 15th day after the date of the enact15 ment of this Act; and

16 (2) with respect to which there would have been

17 a lower duty if the amendment made by section 1

18 had applied to such entry or withdrawal;

19 shall be liquidated or reliquidated as though such entry

20 or withdrawal had occurred on such 15th day.
### Page 1 of 3 **Disposition Comments Docket No:**  

### FAA - 2011 - 1 0 6 6 These comments are in **Directorate ID:** 

### 201 1 -NM - 0 50 - AD response to an SNPRM Originating Office Tracking No.: **Next Step:** FRAN SNPRM 

### N o C omments/Only

Supportive Comments Received

– If this box is checked, no signatures are required. No 

### Has the reference d service information been revised since the NPRM was issued? I f ye s, lis t latest revision and attach a cop y. Note that changes beyond the scope of the previously published NPRM will require a new notice. Contact the Directorate focal point for guidance. Instructions: Summarize all comments **by issue** (not by commenter) and provide your recommended resolution of each issue. **All comments relating to the sam e issue should be discussed together.**  Do not list all of the issues from one commenter togeth er. If changes to the AD are required based on the comments received, explain why and describe in detail what change(s) you recommend. Reference FAA - IR- M - 8040.1C Chapter 9. **ISSUE 1:** Select one o

f the following : If other, explain : Commenter(s): What change to the AD action is requested? Why is the change requested or how is it justified? Do we agree? If **YES,** we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: If **PARTIALLY AGREE** , we agree with because We disagree with because

Make the following changes to the AD: If **NO** , we don’t agree because **ISSUE 2**  **:** Select one of the following :

If other, explain : Commenter(s): What change to the AD action is requested? Why is the change requested or how is it justified? Do we agree? If **YES,** we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: If **PARTIALLY AGREE** , we agree with because We disagree with because Make the following changes to the AD:

### Page 2 of 3

If **NO** , we don’t agree because **For additional issues, do uble**  **- click**  **here**

### Page 3 of 3 **S ignature Section**  Signature indicates concurrence with this action. Originating Office Tracking No.: **ASE** Printed Name **: Date** 

**Branch M anager**  **Date**
#### Mrs. Doris CHENEVERT et al. v. LOWER COAST CORPORATION and Travelers Insurance Company.

No. 7258.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana. First Circuit.

Sept. 27, 1967.

King F. Nungesser, Jr., New Orleans, for respondent-plaintiffs-appellants.

John E. Coleman, Jr., of Aycock, Horne, Caldwell & Coleman, Franklin, La., for mover-defendants-appellees.

Before LOTTINGER, SARTAIN and ELLIS, JJ.

ELLIS, Judge.

This case is before us on a motion to dismiss, the record herein not having been lodged in this court and the return date fixed by the court below having expired.

The affidavit of the Clerk of the district court shows that appellant was billed for the costs of preparing the record for appeal, but failed to pay it, despite the fact that three extensions of the return date were obtained by the Clerk, and several statements of the costs due furnished appellant’s counsel. The last extended return date was February 10, 1967, and this motion to dismiss was filed on July 10, 1967.

Under the above circumstances, the failure to lodge the record timely is imputable to the appellant, and his appeal must be dismissed. R.S. 13:4445; Code of Civil Procedure, Arts! 2125, 2126, 2127; Jackson v. Dupont, Inc., 140 So.2d 463 (La.App., 1 Cir., 1962).

Appeal dismissed.
Exhibit 23.1

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The Board of Directors

Devcon International Corp and Subsidiaries:

We consent to the incorporation
by reference in the registration statements listed below of Devcon International Corp. and Subsidiaries of our report dated April 16, 2007, except as to Note 2, which is as of February 25, 2008, with respect to the consolidated balance sheet of
Devcon International Corp. and Subsidiaries as of December 31, 2006, and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders equity and comprehensive (loss) income, and cash flows for the year ended December 31, 2006, which
report appears in the December 31, 2006 annual report on Form 10-K/A of Devcon International Corp. and Subsidiaries.



| |  |  | Forms S-8 (Registration No. 333-113853, No. 33-59557 and No. 333-92231)
| | - |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | Forms S-3 and S-3/A (Registration No. 333-119158 and No. 33-65235)
| | - |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------

/s/ Berenfeld, Spritzer, Shechter & Sheer LLP

Certified Public Accountants

Fort Lauderdale, Florida

February 28, 2008
EX-10.14



 Exhibit 10.14 
  





 
 July 31, 2012 
 Rohan
Hastie 
 [omitted] 

[omitted]  
 RE: Retention Bonus 

Dear Rohan: 
 As a valued member of the management team of
Hologic and now the newly acquired Gen-Probe, your strong knowledge, skills and experience are even more essential to the successful integration of both companies. Hologic wants to encourage you to stay in your role, particularly as we integrate
Gen-Probe into Hologic. As such, you have been selected to participate in a retention program that was developed in connection with this integration. Subject to the terms and conditions set forth below, I am pleased to inform you that you are
eligible for a total bonus in the amount of $325,000 (the “Retention Bonus”) contingent upon the following: 
  

	 	•	 	You remain continuously employed by Hologic through August 14, 2013 and August 14, 2014 (the “Retention Dates”) 

  


	 	•	 	You perform to the best of your abilities 

 The Retention Bonus will be paid out within thirty (30) days
following the Retention Dates (50% on August 14, 2013 and 50% on August 14, 2014) and will be subject to all applicable federal, state and/or local withholding and/or payroll taxes. Payment will be processed during the next regularly
scheduled payroll. 
 Hologic is not obligated to pay you the Retention Bonus if you voluntarily leave Hologic prior to the Retention Date or if you are
involuntarily terminated because your job performance or conduct is not at a satisfactory level. Please also keep in mind that nothing herein alters the at-will nature of your employment, meaning that you or Hologic may terminate your employment at
any time with or without notice or cause. You hereby agree to keep the terms of this letter confidential and not to disclose this letter or its terms except to your spouse, attorney, or financial advisor. 

I look forward to your great success and the success of the Diagnostics Division. 
  

									
	Sincerely,	 		 	ACCEPTED AND AGREED:
	HOLOGIC, INC.	 		 		 	
		 		 		 		 	/s/ Rohan Hastie
					
	By:	 	/s/ Dave Brady	 		 		 	Rohan Hastie
	Name:	 	Dave Brady	 		 		 	
	Title:	 	SVP, Human Resources	 		 		 	Dated: 08/08/2012
No. 00-7397.

#### Hamer *v.*Johnson, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Institutional Division.

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.