alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2015027EN.01000101.xml

| 27.1.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 27/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.1.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 27/1

---

Notice for the attention of the data subjects to whom the restrictive measures provided for in Council Regulation (EU) No 36/2012, as implemented by Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/108 concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Syria applies

(2015/C 27/01)

The attention of data subjects is drawn to the following information in accordance with Article 12 of Regulation (EC) No 45/2001 (1):

1

The legal basis for this processing operation is Regulation (EU) No 36/2012 (2), as implemented by Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/108 (3).

2

3

The controller of this processing operation is the Council of the European Union represented by the Director General of DG C (Foreign Affairs, Enlargement, Civil Protection) of the General Secretariat of the Council and the department entrusted with the processing operation is the Unit 1C of DG C that can be contacted at:

| Council of the European Union |
| --- |
| General Secretariat |
| DG C 1C |
| Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175 |
| 1048 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |
| E-mail: sanctions@consilium.europa.eu |

Council of the European Union

General Secretariat

DG C 1C

Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175

1048 Bruxelles/Brussel

BELGIQUE/BELGIË

E-mail: sanctions@consilium.europa.eu

The purpose of the processing operation is the establishment and updating of the list of persons subject to restrictive measures in accordance with Regulation EU) No 36/2012, as implemented by Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/108.

The data subjects are the natural persons who fulfil listing criteria as laid down in that Regulation.

The personal data collected includes data necessary for the correct identification of the person concerned, the Statement of Reasons and any other data related thereto.

The personal data collected may be shared as necessary with the European External Action Service and the Commission.

Without prejudice to restrictions provided for in Article 20(1)(a) and (d) of Regulation (EC) No 45/2001, requests for access, as well as requests for rectification or objection will be answered in accordance with section 5 of Council Decision 2004/644/EC (4).

4

Personal data will be retained for 5 years from the moment the data subject has been removed from the list of persons subject to the asset freeze or the validity of the measure has expired, or for the duration of court proceedings in the event they had been started.

Data subjects may have recourse to the European Data Protection Supervisor in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 45/2001.

---

(1)  OJ L 8, 12.1.2001, p. 1.

1

(2)  OJ L 16, 19.1.2012, p. 1.

2

(3)  OJ L 20, 27.1.2015, p. 2.

3

(4)  OJ L 296, 21.9.2004, p. 16.

4

---
#### Jesse Bowles GLENN, Appellant, v. Thomas R. GIBSON and Julia B. Gibson, Appellees.

No. 66-852.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Third District.

Dec. 12, 1967.

Weinstein & Weissenborn, Miami, for appellant.

Harris & Albury, Key West, Podhurst & Orseck, Miami, for appellees.

Before CHARLES CARROLL, C. J., and PEARSON and HENDRY, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant was the defendant in a negligence action wherein plaintiffs charged defendant with negligently causing an automobile collision that injured plaintiffs. Defendant appeals from an adverse judgment entered pursuant to a jury verdict.

It is appellant’s contention that there was insufficient evidence to take the case to the jury and that the court should have directed a verdict in favor of the appellant. We find no merit in this contention.

The record on appeal indicates that there was sufficient evidence to create a jury issue and the court was correct in denying the motion for directed verdict. It is our view that the jury verdict should not be disturbed as no error has been clearly made to appear. Therefore, the judgment appealed is affirmed. See Atlantic Coast Line R. Co. v. Gary, Fla.1951, 57 So.2d 10; Mercy Hospital, Inc. v. Larkins, Fla.App.1965, 174 So.2d 408; Sears, Roebuck & Company v. Sheppard, Fla.App.1967, 194 So.2d 62.

Affirmed.
|   | (i)    | the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of the Company, for the period  ended April 30, 2014, and to which this certification is attached as Exhibit 32 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and |
|--------|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    |
|   | (ii)   | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.                                                                                                                                                                    |

|   | June 23, 2014      |
|--------|-------------------------|
|   |                    |
|   |                    |
|   | /s/Bob Bates            |
| By:    | Bob Bates               |
|   | Chief Financial Officer |

----
Exhibit 10.1

 Exhibit 10.1
  
AMENDMENT TO 
 EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT
 

 THIS AMENDMENT (the “Amendment”) to the EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT between GLENN PRILLAMAN (“Employee”) and STANLEY FURNITURE COMPANY, INC., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), dated July 22, 2016 (the “Employment Agreement”), shall be effective November 30, 2016. 
 

 WHEREAS, the Employee and the Company have the power to amend the Employment Agreement and now wish to do so; 
 

 NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing and the mutual agreements herein contained, the parties agree as follows:
 

 1.         Section 3(a) of the Employment Agreement is hereby amended in its entirety as follows: 
 Salary. During the Employee’s employment hereunder, the Company shall pay the Employee for all services rendered by the Employee a base salary at an annual rate of at least $255,000, with upward adjustments as the Board of Directors of the Company shall deem appropriate (the “Salary”); provided, however, that the Employee’s Salary for calendar year 2017 shall be $191,250. The Salary shall be payable to the Employee in accordance with the Company’s usual paying practices, but not less frequently than monthly. For avoidance of doubt, any quarterly “make-whole” payment which Employee has received or is entitled to receive for calendar year 2017 pursuant to resolutions adopted by the Company’s Compensation and Benefits Committee as of the date hereof shall be treated as part of Employee’s (i) Salary for calendar year 2017 for purposes of Section 17(b) of this Agreement and (ii) “annual base salary” for calendar year 2017 for purposes of determining his “Base Salary Amount” as defined in his Change in Control Agreement. 
 2.         In all other respects, the Employment Agreement is hereby ratified and confirmed.
 

 [SIGNATURE PAGE FOLLOWS]
  

  
 


 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Employee and the Company have executed this Amendment as of the day and year above written.
 

 COMPANY:
  
 STANLEY FURNITURE COMPANY, INC.
 

 By:
 /s/T. Scott McIhenny, Jr.______ 
 T. Scott McIlhenny, Jr., Chairman,
 Compensation and Benefits Committee
 

 

 

 EMPLOYEE:
 

 

 /s/Glenn Prillaman__________________
 Glenn Prillaman
# C_2015319EN.01000402.xml

| 26.9.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 319/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.9.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 319/4

---

Information communicated by Member States regarding closure of fisheries

(2015/C 319/06)

In accordance with Article 35(3) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1224/2009 of 20 November 2009 establishing a Community control system for ensuring compliance with the rules of the common fisheries policy (1), a decision has been taken to close the fishery as set down in the following table:

1

| Date and time of closure | 31.8.2015 |
| --- | --- |
| Duration | 31.8.2015-31.12.2015 |
| Member State | Spain |
| Stock or Group of stocks | GHL/2A-C46 |
| Species | Greenland halibut (Reinhardtius hippoglossoides) |
| Zone | Union waters of IIa and IV; Union and international waters of Vb and VI |
| Type(s) of fishing vessels | — |
| Reference number | 40/TQ104 |

Date and time of closure

31.8.2015

Duration

31.8.2015-31.12.2015

Member State

Spain

Stock or Group of stocks

GHL/2A-C46

Species

Greenland halibut (Reinhardtius hippoglossoides)

Reinhardtius hippoglossoides

Zone

Union waters of IIa and IV; Union and international waters of Vb and VI

Type(s) of fishing vessels

—

Reference number

40/TQ104

---

(1)  OJ L 343, 22.12.2009, p. 1.

1

---
EX-10.1



 Exhibit 10.1 

Mitek Systems, Inc. Executive Bonus Program - Fiscal 2017 

Objective 
 The objective of the Mitek Executive Bonus
Program (the “Program”) is to reward executives with an opportunity to earn a cash bonus for their contributions to the achievement of corporate goals during the fiscal year. This plan is intended to ensure a competitive total compensation
opportunity and to foster a team effort in the attainment of corporate goals. 
 Program Design 

The Program provides for the payment of an annual cash bonus that is based upon the percentage achievement of the fiscal 2017 annual revenue and/or non-GAAP
net income targets set by the Board of Directors as well as individual performance goals. 
 Chief Executive Officer (CEO) and Chief Financial Officer
(CFO) Bonus 
 Annual cash bonuses are computed as a percentage of the participant’s annualized salary earned during the 2017 fiscal year. The bonus
targets for the CEO and CFO are equal to 80% and 50%, respectively, of their respective annualized salaries for fiscal 2017. The total annual cash bonus will be comprised of the following components: 50% based on revenue performance, 25% based on
non-GAAP net income performance and 25% based on individual performance goals. The maximum bonus payable to the Company’s CEO and CFO is 150% of their respective bonus targets. 

General Manager (GM) Bonus 
 The annual cash bonus target
for the GM is equal to 100% of his annualized salary for fiscal 2017. Up to 87.5% of the bonus target is based upon achievement of certain financial metrics (revenue and non-GAAP net income) and the remaining 12.5% of the bonus target is based upon
achievement of certain individual performance goals. The GM’s annual bonus will be paid quarterly based upon achievement of goals. The maximum bonus payable to the GM is 150% of his bonus target. 

Eligibility 
 In order to be eligible for a bonus award,
the participant must be employed by the Company for a minimum of a full quarter of the fiscal year for which an annual bonus is earned. Each participant will be paid after the close of the books and after the annual audit at the end of the 2017
fiscal year is substantially complete, and any bonus payable will be calculated pro rata to the number of days of employment with the Company during the 2017 fiscal year. 

Limitations 
 The Program is administered by the
Compensation Committee. Final authority and full discretion in all matters pertaining to the development, or amendment of the Program and the granting of any bonus award under the Program rests with the Compensation Committee. 

Participation in the Program does not in any way imply a contractual relationship for employment or in any way alter the at-will employment relationship with
the Company.
#### PHOENIX INS. CO. v. KINCAID.

No. 36551.

Supreme Court of Florida.

April 1968.

Certiorari dismissed without opinion. 199 So.2d 770.
Certification of CEO and CFO Pursuant to
 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
 As Adopted Pursuant to
 Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
 
 In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Firsthand Technology Value Fund, Inc. (the “Company”) for the quarter ended September 30, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), Kevin Landis, as Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:
 
 (1)           The report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 134; and
 
 (2)           The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 /s/ Kevin LandisName: Kevin LandisTitle: Chief Financial Officer and Chief Financial OfficerDate: November 8, 2013
EXHIBIT 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. {section} 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Noble China Holdings Limited (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Jeremy Mork, Chief Executive and Financial  Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. {section} 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes- Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



|Dated:  May 13, 2011
By  /s/ Jeremy Mork
-----------------------------
    Jeremy Mork
    Chief Executive and  Financial Officer
   (Principal Executive and Financial Officer)
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3388 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3388

 To suspend temporarily the duty on Cardiolite (complete dosage kits).

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 27, 1993

 Mr. Meehan (for himself and Mr. Neal of Massachusetts) introduced the 
 following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To suspend temporarily the duty on Cardiolite (complete dosage kits).

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CARDIOLITE.

    Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of 
the United States is amended by inserting in numerical sequence the 
following new heading:

      

       ``  9902.31.12  Cardiolite (complete dosage kits) (provided for in                          No change        No change        On or before 12/   
                        subheading 3006.30.50)..................................  Free                                                31/94           ''

SEC. 2. APPLICABILITY.

    The amendment made by section 1 applies with respect to goods 
entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after the 
15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.

                                 <all>
```
#### STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE CO., Appellant, v. M. Thurston LITTLE, Appellee.

No. 46673.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

May 22, 1972.

Sharp & Fisher, Corinth, for appellant.

Smith, Downs, Coleman & Ross, Corinth, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED DECEMBER 6, 2019

NO. 03-19-00731-CV

Sergio Alderete, Jr., Appellant

v.

The Attorney General of Texas, Appellee

APPEAL FROM COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 4 OF WILLIAMSON COUNTY

BEFORE JUSTICES GOODWIN, BAKER, AND KELLY

DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION -- OPINION BY JUSTICE GOODWIN

Having reviewed the record, it appears that the Court lacks jurisdiction over the appeal. 

Therefore, the Court dismisses the appeal for want of jurisdiction. Because appellant’s notice of

appeal was filed with the trial court and expressly requested a hearing in the trial court from the 

order signed by the associate judge, no adjudication of costs is made.
Exhibit 32.2  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), the undersigned officer of 3Pea International, Inc., a Nevada corporation (the "Company"), does hereby certify, to the best of his knowledge, that:  1.     The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2011 (the "Report") of the Company complies in all material respects with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and  2.     The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  /s/ Arthur De Joya  Arthur De Joya, Chief Financial Officer (principal financial and accounting officer)  Date:  May 13, 2011
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                             205
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                          91,935
<DEPRECIATION>                                   8,021
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  88,086
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                         60,536
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               15
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                      23,099
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    88,086
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 3,728
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    1,672
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   643
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,371
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (221)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (221)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (221)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.14)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.14)
        

</TABLE>
-83 -82 -81 -80 -79 -78 -77 -76

 37

 38

 39

 40

 41

★

▲

▲

▲

▲

★ ▲ ▲

▲

▲

 500

 1000

 1500

 500

18 12 06 00

07/18

NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL

 Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 18 Jul 06

 EDAS Meteorological Data

Source

★ at 38.92 N 77.01 W Meters AGL
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3152 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3152

   To suspend, until January 1, 1997, the duty on N,N-dimethyl-N'-(3-
 ((methylamino)carbonyl)oxy)phenyl)meth-animidamide monohydrochloride.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 28, 1993

 Mr. Hoekstra introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To suspend, until January 1, 1997, the duty on N,N-dimethyl-N'-(3-
 ((methylamino)carbonyl)oxy)phenyl)meth-animidamide monohydrochloride.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. N,N-DIMETHYL-N'-(3-((METHYLAMINO)CAR- BONYL)- 
              OXY)PHENYL)METHANIMIDAMIDE MONOHYDROCHLORIDE.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

       ``  9902.31.12   N,N-Dimethyl-N' (3-                      No change      No change      On or before     
                         ((methylamino)-                                                        12/31/96      ''
                         carbonyl)oxy)- phenyl)-                                                               .
                         methanimidamide                                                                        
                         monohydrochloride (CAS No.                                                             
                         23422-53-9) (provided for in                                                           
                         subheading 2925.20.30)......  Free                                                     

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
with respect to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for 
consumption, on or after the 15th day after the date of the enactment 
of this Act.

                                 <all>
```
#### CITY OF LAUDERDALE LAKES, a municipal corporation of the State of Florida, and Jack Roarback, as Chief Building Contractor, Appellants. v. STATE of Florida, ex rel. TENNECO OIL COMPANY, a Delaware corporation, Appellee.

No. 72-186.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Dec. 6, 1972.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Broward County; James F. Minnet, Judge.

Appeal dismissed.