alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
OFFICE OF THE AlTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS AUSTIN

Thank you ror uithwhiehyou enolomtl t0 060 Rm0la6 ti a6 follwat 

### wooaber ax, 1939, filea-

WaQite . cd*, &a part,

*gi6terila Arohlt4oto

$-etbeOxkbonon. ana bOrw4 80 aslt fEliaf rQuMr. Thomm D. Broad, Page 2

advise us whether or not we have against this man, ana ii 60, the whleh to proo44U in the matter. .~ - . a proper o&de prop= ray in we do nat want to take eotion Illit we mow that we ar4 rigm.- Seotion 12 of the Arohiteote'Registration law, Artiole 

### 249a, V. 

### A. C. S., reads as toll0u6:

~Reglstratlon

oertlrioate6

or amhlteots ir 6U6a in 6OOOrdanO6 with thi.6 Aot, Sh#I31

&n ti full roroe and erreotuntil expirationdate unlear revoked for oauee a6 herein prwld4di *The registration

orrtiifloate

**and** 

### right

**if** ally person t0 praotioearohiteoturein th%s Stat4 may be revoked and oanoell4dby any Di6triOt 

### COUrt Or this State, in a 6ui8 t8y the 5tate upon 

### t&e.rc latlon o? th4 Board of Amhiteotural fEaduaiaex6, apen the proof ot the tlelationof the law In my mmpeot in regard thereto, or for any 462~60 for rhloh the Board of ArohiteoturalRmainera lb authorized to r4fu6e to grant registrationoertffioatee, or r0r 

### proor 0r gr066 incmpetcmay, or ior reoklesaness In th4 oonetruotlonot.bulldlnge.on the part of the arohiteot%46lgning,p&innAng,or 6UpeFVi6iXIg

the 0066tl-UOtiOU Or altWd&n Of 6aIE8, or tar diahoneetpraotiee on ths part oi the

YOU Will nQt4 that SU4h 6eOtfOu 18 W&46 it th4 aU8Y Of th4 COUIity

Or Di6tfiOtAbtOmC#y 843 pFO6OOUte ~h~~4b 8Uit6 on yeur direotion,and for suoh pargo 6uoh 0ffi44r i6 your attorney and not the Atkrmo]r 'tinera W %X66. ,lVbre ever, we do not believe that it %6 within tMT px6riuo4 ,tO aeterminswhether or noti evidtmoe id euirlc)isat $0 warrant LMr. Thomas D. Rroad, Page 3

proseoutlon. Regardlessor the way we might deolde and advise you the County or DistrictAttorney or the Jury plight believe otherwise. firthemore, WC are or the opinion that your honorableBoard is better equipped throughprof466lOnal educationand experlenoeto detewlne whether or not the arohlteot in questionhas aaherred to the proper standards or a protessional

arohlteot,as sat forth in Article 249a or the V4rnon1sAnnotateaCivil Statutes.

Consequently,

you are reapeotfullyadvisedand It it3 the opinion or this Departmentthat the Texas B06Fa of ArohlteotaralExaminersin prooe,edlng6 to revoke the reglstratlon oertifloateOf 6 proieselona~ arohlteot for conduct withln the oontemplatton Or Ssotion 12 or Art1416 249a 6houl.d prlnarllydetermineror itsali: whether or not it deams proper arohiteotnral stanfyfsrds

aa laid down by the statutehave been d4partedfrom lo the partlsular0864, ,4nd having 60 aetermin4dIt should turn all evidenoe ov4r to the proper County or Mstrlot AttOmey ror Droce$d4ngs,pursuant to Section 12, Artlole 249a, of the V4rnon s Aunotated Clvlf.

statutes.

Walter R. Kooh Aseistant



## w B-4& APPROVEDJAN 12, 1940 James D. Smullan JSrBBB
# C_2017399EN.01020801.xml

| 24.11.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 399/208 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.11.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 399/208

---

P8_TA(2015)0421

EU-Liechtenstein agreement on the automatic exchange of financial account information *

European Parliament legislative resolution of 2 December 2015 on the proposal for a Council decision on the conclusion, on behalf of the European Union, of the Amending Protocol to the Agreement between the European Community and the Principality of Liechtenstein providing for measures equivalent to those laid down in Council Directive 2003/48/EC on taxation of savings income in the form of interest payments (COM(2015)0395 — C8-0320/2015 — 2015/0175(NLE))

(Consultation)

(2017/C 399/28)

The European Parliament,

The European Parliament

| — | having regard to the proposal for a Council decision (COM(2015)0395), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the proposal for a Council decision (COM(2015)0395),

| — | having regard to the draft Amending Protocol to the Agreement between the European Community and the Principality of Liechtenstein providing for measures equivalent to those laid down in Council Directive 2003/48/EC on taxation of savings income in the form of interest payments (11798/2015), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the draft Amending Protocol to the Agreement between the European Community and the Principality of Liechtenstein providing for measures equivalent to those laid down in Council Directive 2003/48/EC on taxation of savings income in the form of interest payments (11798/2015),

| — | having regard to Article 115 and Article 218(6), second subparagraph, point (b), and paragraph (8), second subparagraph, of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament (C8-0320/2015), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to Article 115 and Article 218(6), second subparagraph, point (b), and paragraph (8), second subparagraph, of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament (C8-0320/2015),

| — | having regard to Rules 59, 108(7) and 50(1) of its Rules of Procedure, |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to Rules 59, 108(7) and 50(1) of its Rules of Procedure,

| — | having regard to the report of the Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs (A8-0334/2015), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the report of the Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs (A8-0334/2015),

| 1. | Approves conclusion of the Amending Protocol to the Agreement; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Approves conclusion of the Amending Protocol to the Agreement;

| 2. | Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council, the Commission and the governments and parliaments of the Member States and of the Principality of Liechtenstein. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council, the Commission and the governments and parliaments of the Member States and of the Principality of Liechtenstein.

---
RTN-12.31.2013-Exhibit 10.39




Exhibit 10.39
Summary of Raytheon Company Long-Term Performance Plan
 
	
		
	•
	The Long-Term Performance Plan (the “LTPP”) is an incentive compensation plan for Raytheon Company (the “Company”) senior executives, including executive officers, designed to promote leadership teamwork toward achieving common performance goals and to foster an effective link between long-term rewards and performance against internal and external goals.




 
	
		
	•
	Each participating senior executive will receive a restricted stock unit award under the LTPP which will entitle the executive to the right to earn shares of the Company’s common stock or cash upon the attainment of the pre-established performance goals over a three-year plan period. The fully independent Management Development and Compensation Committee (the “Committee”) of the Company’s Board of Directors establishes the specific pre-established levels of Company performance for each three year LTPP cycle.




 
	
		
	•
	The Committee approved three metrics for purposes of determining performance goals weighted as follows:   return on invested capital (50%); cumulative free cash flow (25%); and total shareholder return (25%).  The goals are independent and additive, which means that if the threshold performance as to one measure is missed, no credit would apply to that element, but could be made up for by above-target performance in another area.

	 
	 

	•
	Each executive will receive an award with a threshold, target and maximum payout. The awards will settle based upon our performance over the cumulative three-year plan period with respect to the stated goals. If the Company’s performance with respect to all three metrics fails to meet the threshold, then the awards will not vest and no payout under the awards will be made. If the Company’s performance with respect to any or all of the three metrics meets or exceeds the threshold, then a varying amount of shares or cash, up to the maximum, may be earned.




 
	
		
	•
	The awards may be settled in shares of the Company’s common stock or cash at the discretion of the Committee. The LTPP operates under, and awards are made pursuant to, the Company’s 2010 Stock Plan. All shares to be issued in settlement of awards shall be issued pursuant to the 2010 Stock Plan.

	 
	 

	 •
	Dividend equivalents will accrue on the restricted stock units and be paid in shares of common stock upon settlement of the awards based upon the number of shares of common stock actually earned pursuant to the award.




 
	
		
	•
	The Committee will review the Company’s performance relative to the applicable metrics and authorize payment in settlement of the awards, if any, after performance results for the three-year performance period are known.
| 1.     | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                |
|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                                                                                                                                 |
| 2.     | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |

|            | Yellow7, Inc. |                                  |
|-----------------|---------------|---------------------------------------|
|            | (Registrant)  |                                  |
|            |          |                                  |   |
| August 15, 2011 | By:           | /s/ Jason Burgess                     |   |
|            |          | Jason Burgess                         |   |
|            |          | President and Chief Executive Officer |   |
|            |          |                                  |   |
# C_2018050EN.01015401.xml

| 9.2.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 50/154 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.2.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 50/154

---

P8_TA(2016)0077

EU-Andorra agreement on the automatic exchange of financial account information *

European Parliament legislative resolution of 9 March 2016 on the proposal for a Council decision on the conclusion, on behalf of the European Union, of the Amending Protocol to the Agreement between the European Community and the Principality of Andorra providing for measures equivalent to those laid down in Council Directive 2003/48/EC on taxation of savings income in the form of interest payments (COM(2015)0631 — C8-0028/2016 — 2015/0285(NLE))

(Consultation)

(2018/C 050/21)

The European Parliament,

The European Parliament

| — | having regard to the proposal for a Council decision (COM(2015)0631), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the proposal for a Council decision (COM(2015)0631),

| — | having regard to the draft Amending Protocol to the Agreement between the European Community and the Principality of Andorra providing for measures equivalent to those laid down in Council Directive 2003/48/EC on taxation of savings income in the form of interest payments (15510/2015), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the draft Amending Protocol to the Agreement between the European Community and the Principality of Andorra providing for measures equivalent to those laid down in Council Directive 2003/48/EC on taxation of savings income in the form of interest payments (15510/2015),

| — | having regard to Article 115 and Article 218(6), second subparagraph, point (b), and paragraph (8), second subparagraph, of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament (C8-0028/2016), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to Article 115 and Article 218(6), second subparagraph, point (b), and paragraph (8), second subparagraph, of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament (C8-0028/2016),

| — | having regard to Rules 59, 108(7) and 50(1) of its Rules of Procedure, |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to Rules 59, 108(7) and 50(1) of its Rules of Procedure,

| — | having regard to the report of the Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs (A8-0047/2016), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the report of the Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs (A8-0047/2016),

| 1. | Approves conclusion of the Amending Protocol to the Agreement; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Approves conclusion of the Amending Protocol to the Agreement;

| 2. | Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council, the Commission and the governments and parliaments of the Member States and of the Principality of Andorra. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council, the Commission and the governments and parliaments of the Member States and of the Principality of Andorra.

---
# C_2015078EN.01000201.xml

| 6.3.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 78/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.3.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 78/2

---

Notice for the attention of the persons subject to the restrictive measures provided for in Council Decision 2014/119/CFSP, as implemented by Council Decision (CFSP) 2015/364, and in Council Regulation (EU) No 208/2014, as implemented by Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/357, concerning restrictive measures directed against certain persons, entities and bodies in view of the situation in Ukraine

(2015/C 78/02)

The following information is brought to the attention of the persons who appear in the Annex to Council Decision 2014/119/CFSP (1), as implemented by Council Decision (CFSP) 2015/364 (2), and in Annex I to Council Regulation (EU) No 208/2014 (3), as implemented by Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/357 (4), concerning restrictive measures directed against certain persons, entities and bodies in view of the situation in Ukraine.

1

2

3

4

The Council of the European Union has decided that the persons that appear in the abovementioned Annexes should be included in the list of persons and entities subject to restrictive measures provided for in Decision 2014/119/CFSP and in Regulation (EU) No 208/2014 concerning restrictive measures directed against certain persons, entities and bodies in view of the situation in Ukraine. The grounds for designations of those persons appear in the relevant entries in those Annexes.

The attention of the persons concerned is drawn to the possibility of making an application to the competent authorities of the relevant Member State(s) as indicated in the websites in Annex II to Regulation (EU) No 208/2014, in order to obtain an authorisation to use frozen funds for basic needs or specific payments (cf. Article 4 of the Regulation).

The persons concerned may submit a request to the Council, together with supporting documentation, that the decision to include them on the abovementioned list should be reconsidered, before 1 December 2015 to the following address:

| Council of the European Union |
| --- |
| General Secretariat |
| DG C 1C |
| Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175 |
| 1048 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |
| E-mail: sanctions@consilium.europa.eu |

Council of the European Union

General Secretariat

DG C 1C

Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175

1048 Bruxelles/Brussel

BELGIQUE/BELGIË

E-mail: sanctions@consilium.europa.eu

The attention of the persons concerned is also drawn to the possibility of challenging the Council’s decision before the General Court of the European Union, in accordance with the conditions laid down in Article 275, second paragraph, and Article 263, fourth and sixth paragraphs, of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union.

---

(1)  OJ L 66, 6.3.2014, p. 26.

1

(2)  OJ L 62, 6.3.2015, p. 25.

2

(3)  OJ L 66, 6.3.2014, p. 1.

3

(4)  OJ L 62, 6.3.2015, p. 1.

4

---
# Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

March 14, 2018

No. 04

- 17

- 00594

- CV

Josh Michael CRUZ,

Appellant

v.

Alicia CRUZ,

Appellee

From the 2nd 25th Judicial District Court, Guada lupe County, Texas

Trial Court No. 15

- 0953

- CV

Jessica Crawford, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

Appellee's motion for extension of time to file their brief is granted.

_________________________________ Sandee Bryan Marion, Ch ief Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 14th day of March, 2018

.

___________________________________ KEITH E. H OTTLE

, Clerk of Court
1 In The 

### Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

__________________ N O . 09
- 21
- 00041
- CV

__________________ J OHN PRESTON BLALOCK AND JOHN PRESTON BLALOCK II, A/K/A BLALOCK HOUSEHOLD , Appellant s V. MERCY WATER SUPPLY CORPORATION , Appellee

__________________________________________________________________ On Appeal from the 258th District Court San Jacinto County, Texas Trial Cause No. CV16 , 563

__________________________________________________________________ MEMORANDUM OPINION
On March 8, 2021 , we notified the parties that the notice of appeal did not identify a judgment or appealable order

. The appellee, Mercy Water Supply Corporation, filed a motion to dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. The appellants, J ohn Preston Blalock and John Preston Blalock II, a/k/a Blalock
Household , filed a response to the Court’s jurisdictional inquiry , but did not identify2 any statutory basis for an acc elerated appeal from an interlocutory order dismissing

some , but not all of their claims

. Generally, appellate courts review only final judgments and interlocutory orders specifically made appealable by statute. Lehmann v. Har

- Con Corp. , 39 S.W.3d 191, 1 95 (Tex. 2001). An appeal from an interlocutory order may proceed as an accelerated appeal “ when allowed by statute [

. ]” See Tex. R. App. P. 28.1

. The appellants failed to identify a signed order by the trial court that they may appeal as an accelerated app eal. See generally Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code Ann. § 51. 01 4. We grant the motion to dismiss. The appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction.
APPEAL DISMISSED.
PER CURIAM

Submitted on March 24, 2021 Opinion Delivered March 25, 2021
Before Golemon , C.J., Kreger and Johnson, JJ.
Exhibit 32.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with this Quarterly Report of WTTJ Corp, on Form 10-Q for the Quarter ending June 30, 2012 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Peter Klamka, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify to the best of my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (1) Such Annual Report on Form 10-Q for the six months ending June 30 2012, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and June 30, 2012 fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of WTTJ Corp.  December 24, 2012By:/s/ Peter KlamkaPeter KlamkaChairman, President and Chief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer)
# C_2015367EN.01001003.xml

| 5.11.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 367/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.11.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 367/10

---

INNOVATIVE MEDICINES INITIATIVE 2 JOINT UNDERTAKING

Publication of the final accounts for the financial year 2014

(2015/C 367/38)

The complete version of the final accounts may be found at the following address:

http://www.imi.europa.eu/sites/default/files/uploads/documents/Budget%20and%20Accounts/AnnualAccounts2014.pdf

---
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 23.2

                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

We consent to the reference to our firm under the caption "Experts" and to the
use of our report dated August 10, 2000, with respect to the financial
statements of C & B Associates, Inc. and C & B Associates II, Ltd. included in
the Registration Statement (Form S-1 No. 33-XXXXX) and related Prospectus of
Linc.net Inc. for the registration of XX,XXX,XXX shares of its common stock.

                                 /s/ CRAWFORD, CARTER, THOMPSON & BARRON, L.L.P.

September 8, 2000
Mineral Wells, Texas
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JOSEPH VINCENT PALOVICH

,

Petitioner

,

v.

JO GENTRY, Warden

,

Respondent

. No. 18

- 72065

ORDER *

Application to File Second or Successive Petition Under 28 U.S.C. § 2254

Argued and Submitted July 19, 2019 San Francisco, California

Before: MURPHY, * * PAEZ, and RAWLINSON , Circuit Judges.

Petitioner Palovich has applied for permission to file a second or successive

habeas corpus application to present a claim that a jury instruction given during his

trial violated his right to due process by eliminating an element of first

- degree

murder. S

ee Sandstrom v. Montana , 442 U.S. 510, 521 (1979).

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

* * The Honorable Michael R. Murphy, United States Circuit Judge for the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit, sitting by designation. 

# FILED

NOV 14 2019

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS2

“The court of appeals may authorize the filing of a second or successive

application only if it determines that the application makes a prima facie showing

that the application satisfies the requirements of [ ' 2244(b)].” 28 U.S.C. ' 2244

(b)(3)(C); see also 9th Cir. Rule 22

- 3(a)(4) (providing that an application to file a

second or successive ' 2254 petition must “state how the requirements of section[]

2244(b) . . . have been satisfied”). Section 2244(b )(2) provides as follows:

A claim presented in a second or successive habeas corpus application . . . that was not presented in a prior application shall be dismissed

unless

C

(A) the applicant shows that the claim relies on a new rule of

constitutional l aw . . . or

(B)(i) the factual predicate for the claim could not have been discovered previously through the exercise of due diligence; and (ii) the facts underlying the claim . . . would be sufficient to establish by clear and convincing evidence that, b ut for constitutional error, no reasonable factfinder would have found the applicant guilty of the underlying offense.

28 U.S.C. ' 2244(b)(2). Palovich has made neither showing. He does not assert

that the factual predicate for his claim could not have been discovered previously.

Nor has he shown that his claim relies on a new rule of constitutional law. The

Supreme Court cases o n which he relies, Montgomery v. Louisiana , 136 S. Ct. 718

(2016) and Welch v. United States , 136 S. Ct. 1257 (2016), do not require

retroactive application of a change in state law, like that adopted by the Nevada3

Supreme Court in Byford v. State , 994 P.2 d 700 (Nev. 2000), to cases on collateral

review.

The application is DENIED.
1

EPA Science Advisory Board Staff Office Response to Public Comments 

received on the Establishment of a New System of Records for the Science 

Advisory Board (SAB) Database of Scientific and Technical Experts (74 FR 

33435-33437)

The comments received were outside the scope of the Privacy Act of 1974 (5 U.S.C. 552a), 

which was the focus of the Federal Register notice. Since the comments were outside the scope 

of those requirements, EPA will not provide a formal response to comments at this time.
#### In re the Marriage of Marcelino A. VEGA, Appellant, v. Gloria A. VEGA, Appellee.

No. 72-448.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Oct. 6, 1972.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed.