alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2018011EN.01015501.xml

| 12.1.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 11/155 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.1.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 11/155

---

P8_TA(2016)0017

EU-Kosovo Stabilisation and Association Agreement ***

European Parliament legislative resolution of 21 January 2016 on the draft Council decision on the conclusion, on behalf of the Union, of the Stabilisation and Association Agreement between the European Union and the European Atomic Energy Community, of the one part, and Kosovo, of the other part (10725/2/2015 — C8-0328/2015 — 2015/0094(NLE))

(Consent)

(2018/C 011/24)

The European Parliament,

The European Parliament

| — | having regard to the draft Council decision (10725/2/2015), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the draft Council decision (10725/2/2015),

| — | having regard to the draft Stabilisation and Association Agreement between the European Union and the European Atomic Energy Community, of the one part, and Kosovo, of the other part (10728/1/2015), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the draft Stabilisation and Association Agreement between the European Union and the European Atomic Energy Community, of the one part, and Kosovo, of the other part (10728/1/2015),

| — | having regard to the request for consent submitted by the Council in accordance with Article 217 and Article 218(6), second subparagraph, point (a)(i), and Article 218(7) and (8), of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (C8-0328/2015), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the request for consent submitted by the Council in accordance with Article 217 and Article 218(6), second subparagraph, point (a)(i), and Article 218(7) and (8), of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (C8-0328/2015),

| — | having regard to Rule 99(1), first and third subparagraphs, Rule 99(2), and Rule 108(7) of its Rules of Procedure, |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to Rule 99(1), first and third subparagraphs, Rule 99(2), and Rule 108(7) of its Rules of Procedure,

| — | having regard to the recommendation of the Committee on Foreign Affairs and the opinion of the Committee on International Trade (A8-0372/2015), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the recommendation of the Committee on Foreign Affairs and the opinion of the Committee on International Trade (A8-0372/2015),

| 1. | Gives its consent to conclusion of the agreement; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Gives its consent to conclusion of the agreement;

| 2. | Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council, the Commission and the governments and parliaments of the Member States and of Kosovo. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council, the Commission and the governments and parliaments of the Member States and of Kosovo.

---
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of
Cogo Group, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Frank Zheng, Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to my knowledge that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



/s/ Frank ZhengFrank ZhengChief Financial OfficerDate: March 16, 2011


A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Cogo Group, Inc. and will be retained by Cogo Group, Inc. furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

______________________________ ) ABDULLAH WAZIR ZADRAN et al., ) ) Petitioners, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 05-2367 (RWR) ) GEORGE W. BUSH et al., ) ) Respondents. ) ______________________________)
ORDER To ensure that the Guantánamo Review Task Force and its Review Panel operating under Executive Order No. 13,492 have not made any recommendations or decisions that would render unnecessary or otherwise inefficient the further expenditure of judicial and party resources in this matter, it is hereby ORDERED that on or before July 31, 2009, the respondents shall file ex parte and under seal a report detailing the status of each petitioner in this matter who is in the Guantánamo Review Task Force review process. The status report shall state whether the Task Force has reviewed the petitioners’ detention, and if not, when it intends to do so. The respondents’ counsel shall have a continuing affirmative obligation to ascertain whether the Review Panel has made any decisions in connection with the recommendations and, if so, notify the court of the results of such decisions.-2-

SIGNED this 13th day of July, 2009.

/ s / RICHARD W. ROBERTS United States District Judge
`[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3840 Engrossed in House (EH)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 3840

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT


 
To designate the Federal building and United States courthouse located 
 at 100 East Houston Street in Marshall, Texas, as the ``Sam B. Hall, 
          Jr. Federal Building and United States Courthouse''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The Federal building located at 100 East Houston Street in 
Marshall, Texas, shall be known and designated as the ``Sam B. Hall, 
Jr. Federal Building and United States Courthouse''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the Federal building and United States 
courthouse referred to in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference 
to the ``Sam B. Hall, Jr. Federal Building and United States 
Courthouse''.

            Passed the House of Representatives May 23, 1994.

            Attest:






                                                                 Clerk.

  
  
  






103d CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 3840

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

To designate the Federal building and United States courthouse located 
 at 100 East Houston Street in Marshall, Texas, as the ``Sam B. Hall, 
          Jr. Federal Building and United States Courthouse''.`
824 - 

OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS 

AUSTIN 

GROVER SELLERS 

ATTORNIY GLNIIIAL 

Ronoroblo aorgo a. !3h8ppud 

Oomptro~ler o? ?ubl.io ~ooou~ta 

Aortia, mm8 
825 

BOnOr8b18 0OOl'E8 H. Sh8ppard - plgS 2 

nOtUy OOUld 8till l X8rO180 hi8 nOt8rl.81 iuOtlOn8 iOr his 

OWS prlV8t8 grin 8OOOrdiB8 to th8 prOVi8lOM Of hJW md8r 

whloh ho qU81tii9d. we 8180 took nota Of the f8Ot that al1 

St8t8 d8p8ZtWllt8 in 8Or?rill& OUt th8ir ttUlOtiOll0 h8V8 8 

k88n nn8d for thl8 tlp0 ef 8OrVlO8 for whloh 110 prOVl8lOn 

hn8 b8.k Md8, 

In VOID r8qUO8t YOU piOB8Ilt 8 QM8tiOn whloh 18 

rO*di1f 6~8tln~Ul8h~b18 fl'Om that iIbVO1Vin6 l BOb r y b o nd. 

you hare 88k86 about tbs 8uthorlty 0r the state to pay ror 

the pUr8h888 Of notary 88818 and othrr 8qUipWNlt Xi808888ry 

to prrform th8 QUti@8 Of 8 not8rr publlo. A88ti& that 8 

propor rpproprirtlon pro~lrion l xi8tr 8othOrisln(l tho ~8~0 

m8nt Of 8UOh OS$8nW, ‘118 880 no 18681 Obj8OtiOn to the PIItint Of the88 it858 pI'Oot148d th.1 8r8 t0 b8 k8.d l XO3ll81VO1T 

cd St8t8.8 b~8iflO88. vnllk8 thr 8okry bond 8ltuatitm, tho 

8qUlpmat laquirod~aboot 08II b8 r8t8in8d in th8 l 281U81T8 

w88088iOn Of th8 S-t8 8lld it8 IA88 t88triOt.d tb State'8 

bUsin Only. ff WO 8r@ OOrT8Ot in OtS 888UIil&JtiOll IUdO 

abOv8, W8 think YOU rOtid be 8uthOrlSOd t0 pa88 iOr p8yIwit the lOOOut in qU88tiOn. 

very truly JOUX8 

ATTORNBY ATTORNBY GlWEiUL GlWEiUL OF OF TEXAS TEXAS 

BY BY 

Eug8no Alti8 

A88l8tant A88i8tmt
## In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

No. 02

- 17

- 00466

- CV

P AMELA S UE K ELLER

, Appellant

V

.

G REGORY A. K ELLER

, Appellee §

§

§

§ On Appeal from the 231st District

Court

of Tarrant County (231

- 560230

- 14)

October 4, 2018

Opinion by Justice Birdwell

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that there

was error in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment of the trial

court is reversed and the case is remanded to the trial court for further proceedings

consistent with this opinion.

It is further ordered that appellee Gregory A. Keller shall pay all of the costs of

this proceeding, for which let execution issue.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

By

_ /s/ Wade Birdwell

__ ________________ Justice Wade Birdwell
# C_2015425EN.01000601.xml

| 18.12.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 425/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.12.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 425/6

---

Notice for the attention of the data subjects to whom the restrictive measures provided for in Council Regulation (EU) No 101/2011 concerning restrictive measures directed against certain persons, entities and bodies in view of the situation in Tunisia apply

(2015/C 425/04)

The attention of data subjects is drawn to the following information in accordance with Article 12 of Regulation (EC) No 45/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council (1):

1

The legal basis for this processing operation is Council Regulation (EU) No 101/2011 (2).

2

The controller of this processing operation is the Council of the European Union represented by the Director-General of DG C (Foreign Affairs, Enlargement, Civil Protection) of the General Secretariat of the Council and the department entrusted with the processing operation is Unit 1C of DG C that can be contacted at:

| Council of the European Union |
| --- |
| General Secretariat |
| DG C 1C |
| Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175 |
| 1048 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |
| E-mail: sanctions@consilium.europa.eu |

Council of the European Union

General Secretariat

DG C 1C

Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175

1048 Bruxelles/Brussel

BELGIQUE/BELGIË

E-mail: sanctions@consilium.europa.eu

The purpose of the processing operation is the establishment and updating of the list of persons subject to restrictive measures in accordance with Regulation (EU) No 101/2011.

The data subjects are the natural persons who fulfil listing criteria as laid down in that Regulation.

The personal data collected includes data necessary for the correct identification of the person concerned, the Statement of Reasons and any other data related thereto.

The personal data collected may be shared as necessary with the European External Action Service and the Commission.

Without prejudice to restrictions provided for in Article 20(1)(a) and (d) of Regulation (EC) No 45/2001, requests for access, as well as requests for rectification or objection will be answered in accordance with section 5 of Council Decision 2004/644/EC (3).

3

Personal data will be retained for 5 years from the moment the data subject has been removed from the list of persons subject to the asset freeze or the validity of the measure has expired, or for the duration of court proceedings in the event they had been started.

Data subjects may have recourse to the European Data Protection Supervisor in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 45/2001.

---

(1)  OJ L 8, 12.1.2001, p. 1.

1

(2)  OJ L 31, 5.2.2011, p. 1.

2

(3)  OJ L 296, 21.9.2004, p. 16.

3

---
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff - Appellee,

 v.

MARIA ESTHER FIGUEROASALINAS,

 Defendant - Appellant.

No. 12-10328

D.C. No. 4:11-cr-02258-CKJ

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Arizona

Cindy K. Jorgenson, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted June 18, 2013** 

Before: TALLMAN, M. SMITH, and HURWITZ, Circuit Judges.

 Maria Esther Figueroa-Salinas appeals from the district court’s judgment

and challenges her guilty-plea conviction and 40-month sentence for reentry after

deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386

FILED

JUN 21 2013

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

 * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

 ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
U.S. 738 (1967), Figueroa-Salinas’s counsel has filed a brief stating that there are

no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We

have provided Figueroa-Salinas the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. 

No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed.

Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S.

75, 80 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal. 

Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED.

The court is in receipt of Figueroa-Salinas’s letter dated May 30, 2013. 

Insofar as the letter can be construed as a motion for substitute counsel, that motion

is denied.

AFFIRMED.

2 12-10328
<PAGE>


                                                                   EXHIBIT 5
September 26, 2000


Illinois Superconductor Corporation
451 Kingston Court
Mount Prospect, Illinois 60056

            RE: Registration Statement on Form S-2
                ----------------------------------

Ladies and Gentlemen:

     We have acted as counsel to Illinois Superconductor Corporation (the
"Company") in connection with the preparation of a Registration Statement on
Form S-2 (the "Registration Statement") under the Securities Act of 1933, as
amended (the "Act"), which the Company is filing with the Securities and
Exchange Commission with respect to up to 71,768,868 shares of Common Stock,
par value $0.001 per share, which have been or may be issued in connection
with the conversion of certain convertible notes and/or exercise of certain
warrants issued to the selling stockholders named therein.

     In connection with this opinion, we have examined and relied upon
originals or copies, certified or otherwise identified to our satisfaction,
of the following:

     1.     the Registration Statement;

     2.     the Certificate of Incorporation and the Certificates of Amendment
to the Certificate of Incorporation of the Company;

     3.     the By-Laws of the Company;

     4.     Resolutions duly adopted by the Board of Directors of the Company
relating to the Merger Agreement and the transactions contemplated therein;

     5.     Certificates of public officials, certificates of officers and
agents of the Company; and

     6.     such other documents and records of the Company and other documents
as we have deemed relevant and necessary for the purpose of this opinion.

     In giving this opinion, we are assuming the authenticity of all
instruments presented to us as originals, the conformity with originals of
all instruments presented to us as copies and the genuineness of all
signatures.

     Based on and subject to the foregoing, we are of the opinion that all
shares included in the Registration Statement have been duly authorized and
that such shares have been validly issued and are fully paid and
nonassessable.

     We hereby consent to the filing of this opinion as an exhibit to the
Registration Statement. We do not, by giving such consent, admit that we are
within the category of persons whose consent is required under Section 7 of
the Act.

                                      SONNENSCHEIN NATH & ROSENTHAL
#### Burns et al., Appellants, *v.*Glander, Tax Commr., et al., Appellees.

(Nos. 30459 and 30460

Decided January 16, 1946.)

*201
      *Mr. Charles F. Schnee*and *Mr. Scott A.*Belden, for appellants.

*Mr. Hugh S.*Jenkins, attorney general, and *Mr. Joseph F. Ford,*for appellees.

By the Court.

Section 5353, General Code (110 Ohio Laws, 77), provides:

“ Lands, houses and other buildings belonging to a county, township, city or village, used exclusively for the accommodation or support of the poor, or leased to the state or any political subdivision thereof for public purposes, and property belonging to institutions used exclusively for charitable purposes, shall be exempt from taxation.”

The facts disclosed by the records in these cases render the case of *Incorporated Trustees of Gospel Worker Society*v. *Evatt, Tax Commr.,*140 Ohio St., 185, 42.N. E. (2d), 900, controlling here.

The syllabus in that case is as follows:

> “1. Property belonging to a charitable institution may not be exempted from taxation unless it is used exclusively for charitable purposes.

> *“2.*Under Section 2 of Article XII, Constitution of Ohio, and Section 5353, General Code, property which is used to produce income to be.used exclusively for charitable purposes may not be exempted from taxation. The test is the present use of the property rather than the ultimate use of proceeds received from the property sought to be exempted.”

In numerous other cases this court has held that exemption from taxation may not be granted where real or personal property of a charitable institution is applied toward producing- income which is used exclusively for charitable purposes. See *Benjamin Rose*Insti-, *202
      *tute*v. *Myers, Treas.,*92 Ohio St., 252, 110 N. E., 924, L. R. A. 1916D, 1170, and *Jones, Treas.,*v. *Conn et al., Trustees,*116 Ohio St., 1,155 N. E., 791, which are cited in the *Gospel Worker case, supra.*

The Board of Tax Appeals also denied the exemption authorized by Section 5351, General Code, and counsel for appellants do not challenge such determination in this court .

The decisions of the Board of Tax Appeals are reasonable and lawful and are affirmed.

*Decisions affirmed.*

Weygandt, C. J., Zimmerman, Bell, Williams, Turner, Matthias and Hart, JJ., concur.
# C_2018086EN.01017301.xml

| 6.3.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 86/173 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.3.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 86/173

---

P8_TA(2016)0262

EU-Philippines Framework Agreement on Partnership and Cooperation (Consent) ***

European Parliament legislative resolution of 8 June 2016 on the draft Council decision on the conclusion, on behalf of the Union, of the Framework Agreement on Partnership and Cooperation between the European Union and its Member States, of the one part, and the Republic of the Philippines, of the other part (05431/2015 — C8-0061/2015 — 2013/0441(NLE))

(Consent)

(2018/C 086/38)

The European Parliament,

The European Parliament

| — | having regard to the draft Council decision (05431/2015), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the draft Council decision (05431/2015),

| — | having regard to the draft Framework Agreement on Partnership and Cooperation between the European Union and its Member States, of the one part, and the Republic of the Philippines, of the other part (15616/2010), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the draft Framework Agreement on Partnership and Cooperation between the European Union and its Member States, of the one part, and the Republic of the Philippines, of the other part (15616/2010),

| — | having regard to the request for consent submitted by the Council in accordance with Articles 207 and 209 and Article 218(6), second subparagraph, point (a) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (C8-0061/2015), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the request for consent submitted by the Council in accordance with Articles 207 and 209 and Article 218(6), second subparagraph, point (a) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (C8-0061/2015),

| — | having regard to its non-legislative resolution of 8 June 2016 (1) on the draft decision, |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to its non-legislative resolution of 8 June 2016 (1) on the draft decision,

1

| — | having regard to Rule 99(1), first and third subparagraphs, Rule 99(2), and Rule 108(7) of its Rules of Procedure, |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to Rule 99(1), first and third subparagraphs, Rule 99(2), and Rule 108(7) of its Rules of Procedure,

| — | having regard to the recommendation of the Committee on Foreign Affairs (A8-0149/2016), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the recommendation of the Committee on Foreign Affairs (A8-0149/2016),

| 1. | Gives its consent to conclusion of the agreement; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Gives its consent to conclusion of the agreement;

| 2. | Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council, the Commission and the governments and parliaments of the Member States and of the Republic of the Philippines. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council, the Commission and the governments and parliaments of the Member States and of the Republic of the Philippines.

---

(1)  Texts adopted of that date, P8_TA(2016)0263.

1

---
EXHIBIT 32.1  SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION  In connection with the quarterly report of First Titan Corp. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2013 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Harvey Bryant, President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. SS. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.  May 15, 2013By:/s/ Harvey BryantHarvey BryantPresident, Principal Executive Officer,
Principal Financial and Accounting officer  A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3840 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 3840

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                 May 25 (legislative day, May 16), 1994

  Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Governmental 
                                Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
To designate the Federal building and United States courthouse located 
 at 100 East Houston Street in Marshall, Texas, as the ``Sam B. Hall, 
          Jr. Federal Building and United States Courthouse''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The Federal building located at 100 East Houston Street in 
Marshall, Texas, shall be known and designated as the ``Sam B. Hall, 
Jr. Federal Building and United States Courthouse''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the Federal building and United States 
courthouse referred to in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference 
to the ``Sam B. Hall, Jr. Federal Building and United States 
Courthouse''.

            Passed the House of Representatives May 23, 1994.

            Attest:

                                           DONNALD K. ANDERSON,

                                                                 Clerk.
```