alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 164 (Thursday, August 23, 2018)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 42589]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-18228]



[[Page 42589]]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary

32 CFR Part 183

[Docket ID: DOD-2017-OS-0053]
RIN 0790-AK05


Defense Support of Special Events

AGENCY: Under Secretary of Defense for Policy, DoD.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This final rule removes the Department of Defense (DoD) 
regulation concerning defense support of special events. This part 
contains internal DoD policy and procedures and assigns 
responsibilities for support of civil authorities and qualifying 
entities during the conduct of special events; therefore, it does not 
require codification. DoD will remove this part but is providing notice 
published elsewhere in this issue of the Federal Register to inform the 
public how civil authorities and qualifying entities may submit 
requests for special event support.

DATES: This rule is effective on August 23, 2018.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Carol Corbin at 571-256-8319.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: It has been determined that publication of 
this CFR part removal for public comment is impracticable, unnecessary, 
and contrary to public interest since it is based on removing DoD 
internal policies and procedures that are publicly available on the 
Department's issuance website.
    DoD internal guidance concerning defense support of special events 
will continue to be published in DoD Instruction 3025.20, ``Defense 
Support of Special Events,'' available at http://www.esd.whs.mil/Portals/54/Documents/DD/issuances/dodi/302520p.pdf.
    Concurrent to the part being removed, DoD, in order to comply with 
5 U.S.C. 552(a), is providing notice in the Federal Register to inform 
the public how to submit requests for special event support.
    This rule is not significant under Executive Order (E.O.) 12866, 
``Regulatory Planning and Review''; therefore, E.O. 13771, ``Reducing 
Regulation and Controlling Regulatory Costs'' does not apply.

List of Subjects in 32 CFR Part 183

    Armed Forces.

PART 183--[REMOVED]

0
Accordingly, by the authority of 5 U.S.C. 301, 32 CFR part 183 is 
removed.

    Dated: August 20, 2018.
Aaron T. Siegel,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 2018-18228 Filed 8-22-18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-06-P
## IN THE COURT O F CRIMINA L A PPEA LS OF TEXA S NO. WR-83,155-02

EX P ARTE JUAN F RANCISCO TURCIOS, Appl icant
ON AP P LICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORP US CAUSE NO. W11-70896-P (A) IN THE 203RD DIST RICT COURT

F ROM DALLAS COUNTY
Per curiam . O R D E R Pursuant to the provisions of Ar t i cl e 1 1
. 07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedur e, the cler k of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habea s corpus. Ex parte Y oung , 418 S.W .2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim
. Ap p . 1 9 6 7). Applicant was convicted of ag g ravated assault and sentenc ed to twenty y ear s’ imprisonment. The Fifth Court of Appea ls aff irmed his conviction. Turcios v. State , 05-12-00840- CR (Tex. App.—Dallas Oct. 7, 2013) (not desig nated for publication). Applicant contends, among other thing s, that trial counsel rende red ineffe ctive assistance
. The trial court enter ed an order desig nating issues, and the Dallas County District Clerk forwa rded2

this a pplication beca

use the trial court did not make finding s of fac t and conclusions of law within 181 day s of the State’s r ece ipt of this application. T E X . R. A P P . P. 73.4(b)( 5). Applicant has alleg ed fac ts that, if true, might entitle him to relief
. Strickland v. W

ashington , 466 U.S. 668 (1984); Ex parte Patterson , 993 S.W .2d 114, 115 (Tex. Crim. App. 1999). I n these circ umstances, additional fac ts are neede d. As we held in Ex parte Rodriguez , 334 S.W .2d 294, 294 (Tex. Crim. App. 1960), the trial court is the appropr iate forum for finding s of fac t. The trial court shall order trial counsel to respond to Applicant’s ineffe ctive assistance of counsel claims. The trial court may use any means set out in T E X . C O D E C R I M . P R O C . art. 11.07, § 3(d)
. I f the trial court elec ts to hold a he aring , it shall determine whe ther Applica nt is indi g ent. I f Applicant i s i ndige nt and wishes to be repr esente d by counsel, the trial court shall appoint an attorney to repre sent him at the hea ring . T E X . C O D E C R I M . P R O C . art. 26.04. After revie wing counsel’ s r e s p o n s e , th e tria l c o u rt shall make finding s of fac t and conclusions of law as to whether counsel’s conduct was defic ient and Applicant was prejudice d. The trial court shall also make any other finding s of fac t and conclusions of law that it d eems rele vant and appropr iate to the disposition of Applicant’s cla ims for habe as cor pus relief
. This application will be held in abeyance until the trial court has resolved the fac t issues. The issues sh al l b e re s o l ved within 90 day s of this order
. A supplemental transcr ipt containing all aff idavits and int err og atories or the t ransc ription of t he court repor ter’s notes from any hear ing or deposition, along with the trial court’ s supplemental finding s of fa ct and c onclusions of law, shall be forwar ded to this Court withi n 120 day s of the date of t his order
. Any extensions of t ime shall be obtained f

rom this Court.

Filed: Jul y

29, 2015 Do not publish
#### GREYHOUND LINES, INC., a California corporation, and Henry Clarence Peraldo, Appellants, v. Johnny REEVES, Jr., et al., Appellees.

No. 71-968.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Dec. 19, 1972.

Rehearing Denied Jan. 10, 1973.

Thomas B. Mimms, Jr., of Fleming, O’Bryan & Fleming, Fort Lauderdale, for appellants.

Robert Orseck, of Podhurst, Orseck & Parks, Miami, and Ferrero Middlebrooks & Houston, Fort Lauderdale, for appellees Reeves.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

CROSS and MAGER, JJ., concur.

WALDEN, J., dissents with opinion.

WALDEN, Judge

(dissenting) :

I dissent.

Three vehicles were involved in a collision with the consequence being a negligence action with three sets of litigants. There were one set of plaintiffs and two sets of defendants. Plaintiffs received verdicts against all defendants.

Three errors were committed, one of which would be harmless if it stood alone.

1. Reversible error was committed in allowing plaintiffs to read into evidence F.S. 186.79, F.S.A., entitled, “Minimum Regulation.” Such statute finds no basis or support under the record facts and circumstances of this case and the manner of its employment was prejudicial to appellant’s case.

2. Violative and regardless of his earlier ruling, the trial judge erroneously permitted a psychologist to testify that a claimant had suffered a traumatic head injury. I am not able to say that this error, alone, was of such moment as to warrant a reversal.

3. Plaintiffs and one set of defendants entered into a Mary Carter agreement. The other defendants learned of the existence of the agreement during the course of the trial and moved for its production and the right of examination. This request was erroneously denied. Maule Industries, Inc. v. Rountree, Fla.App.1972, 264 So.2d 445. The effect of this was to deny appellants their right to a fair trial as framed in ap*473pellant’s Point C because of the laison between plaintiffs and one set of defendants which operated in opposition to appellant’s position.

T ,, „ J r I would reverse and remand for a new . . , trial.
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 165 (Friday, August 24, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Page 42947]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-18323]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT


Hispanic Council on Federal Employment

AGENCY: Office of Personnel Management.

ACTION: Announcement of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Hispanic Council on Federal Employment (Council) meeting 
will be held on at the following time and location shown below. The 
Council is an advisory committee composed of representatives from 
Hispanic organizations and senior Government officials. Along with its 
other responsibilities, the Council shall advise the Director of the 
U.S. Office of Personnel Management on matters involving the 
recruitment, hiring, and advancement of Hispanics in the Federal 
workforce. The Council is chaired by the Director of the U.S. Office of 
Personnel Management.

DATES: September 25, 2018 from 1:30 p.m. to 3:00 p.m.

ADDRESSES: Office of Personnel Management, 1900 E St. NW, Washington, 
DC 20415, Executive Conference Room.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Allison Wise, Program Director, 
Diversity and Inclusion, U.S. Office of Personnel Management, 1900 E 
St. NW, Suite 7439-I, Washington, DC 20415. Phone (202) 606-8462, FAX 
(202) 606-6012 or email at <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#0f4e6363667c60612158667c6a4f607f6221686079"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="642508080d170b0a4a330d1701240b14094a030b12">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The meeting is open to the public. Please 
contact the U.S. Office of Personnel Management if you wish to present 
material to the Council at any of the meetings. The manner and time 
prescribed for presentations may be limited, depending upon the number 
of parties that express interest in presenting information.

Office of Personnel Management.
Jeff T.H. Pon,
Director.
[FR Doc. 2018-18323 Filed 8-23-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6820-B2-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
V

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 3544

To authorize the Secretary of Transportation to issue a certificate of documentation with appropriate endorsement for employment in the coastwise

trade of the United States for the vessel MANDIRAN.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

NOVEMBER 18, 1993

Mr. KASICH introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee

on Merchant Marine and Fisheries

A BILL

To authorize the Secretary of Transportation to issue a

certificate of documentation with appropriate endorsement for employment in the coastwise trade of the

United States for the vessel MANDIRAN.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That, notwithstanding section 27 of the Merchant Marine

4 Act, 1920 (46 App. U.S.C. 883) and sections 12106,

5 12107, and 12108 of title 46, United States Code, as ap6 plicable on the date of this Act, the Secretary of Transpor7 tation may issue a certificate of documentation with ap-
2

HR 3544 IH

1 propriate endorsement for the vessel Auxiliary Sloop

2 MANDIRAN, United States official number O.N. 939915.

Æ
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 3660

To amend the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968 to

ensure that chaplains killed in the line of duty receive benefits.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

NOVEMBER 22, 1993

Mr. MANZULLO (for himself and Mr. WELDON) introduced the following bill;

which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

A BILL

To amend the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets

Act of 1968 to ensure that chaplains killed in the line

of duty receive benefits.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION. 1. BENEFITS FOR CHAPLAINS.

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 1204 of the Omnibus

5 Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968 is amended—

6 (1) by redesignating paragraphs (2) through

7 (7) as (3) through (8), respectively;

8 (2) by inserting after paragraph (1) the follow9 ing:
2

•HR 3660 IH

1 ‘‘(2) chaplain means any individual serving as

2 an officially recognized or designated member of a

3 legally organized volunteer fire department or legally

4 organized police department, or an officially recog5 nized or designated public employee of a legally or6 ganized fire or police department who was respond7 ing to a fire, rescue, or police emergency.’’; and

8 (3) in paragraph (8), as redesignated by para9 graph (1) of this Act, by striking ‘‘or rescue squad

10 or ambulance crew’’ and inserting ‘‘rescue squad or

11 ambulance crew, or chaplain’’.

12 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by

13 subsection (a) shall take effect on the date of enactment

14 of this Act and shall apply to injuries or deaths that occur

15 in the line of duty on or after such date.

Æ
# C_2015367EN.01000901.xml

| 5.11.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 367/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.11.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 367/9

---

EUROPEAN UNION AGENCY FOR NETWORK AND INFORMATION SECURITY

Publication of the final accounts for the financial year 2014

(2015/C 367/32)

The complete version of the final accounts may be found at the following address:

https://www.enisa.europa.eu/about-enisa/accounting-finance

---
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY

ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of China Liaoning Dingxu Ecological Agriculture Development, Inc. (the
“Company”) for the nine-months ended September 30, 2018 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Daniel Sobolewski, Interim President and Interim Chief Executive Officer
of the Company, do hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge and belief, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------





|By: | /s/ Daniel Sobolewski                                 | 
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------- | 
|    | Daniel Sobolewsk                                      | 
|    | Interim President and Interim Chief Executive Officer | 
|    | (Principal Executive Officer)                         | 
|    | January 10, 2019                                      | 





A signed original of this certification
required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company
and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request. The foregoing
certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a
separate disclosure document.
Exhibit312 12.31.13




Exhibit 31.2
CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER CERTIFICATION


I, Jillian Sheehan, certify that:


		
	1.
	I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Textura Corporation for the period ended December 31, 2013, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof;


		
	2.
	Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;


		
	3.
	Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;


		
	4.
	The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:


		
	(a)
	Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;


		
	(b)
	Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and


		
	(c)
	Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and


		
	5.
	The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):


		
	(a)
	All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and


		
	(b)
	Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.




Date: February 13, 2014



	
		
	 

	 
	 

	 
	/s/ Jillian Sheehan

	 
	Jillian Sheehan

	 
	Chief Financial Officer of Textura Corporation

	 
	(principal financial officer)
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF BLUE WAVE SYSTEMS INC. AS OF MARCH 31, 1998, AND FOR THE
THE NINE MONTHS THEN ENDED, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                           4,755
<SECURITIES>                                     4,071
<RECEIVABLES>                                    2,528
<ALLOWANCES>                                       121
<INVENTORY>                                      2,951
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                15,927
<PP&E>                                           2,589
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,693
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  16,853
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            2,050
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            57
<OTHER-SE>                                      14,746
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    16,853
<SALES>                                          9,145
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 9,145
<CGS>                                            4,638
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    4,638
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 4,554
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    366
<INCOME-TAX>                                        31
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                335
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       335
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .07
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .06
        

</TABLE>
y

MANDATE

Court of Appeals 

First District of Texas 

NO. 01-15-00209-CV

DOCTORS PRACTICE MANAGEMENT, INC., Appellant

V.

MEDICAL MULTIMEDIA ADVERTISING, INC., Appellee

Appeal from the 234th District Court of Harris County. (Tr. Ct. No. 2013-36797).

TO THE 234TH DISTRICT COURT OF HARRIS COUNTY, GREETINGS:

Before this Court, on the 4th day of June, 2015, the cause upon appeal to revise or to 

reverse your judgment was determined. This Court made its order in these words:

This case is an appeal from the final judgment signed by the trial court 

on December 8, 2014. After due consideration, the Court grants the 

parties’ joint motion to reverse and render judgment. Accordingly, the 

Court vacates the trial court’s judgment and renders judgment that Medical 

Multimedia Advertising, Inc. take nothing in its action against Doctors 

Practice Management, Inc.; that Doctors Practice Management, Inc. take 

nothing in its counterclaims against Medical Multimedia Advertising, Inc.; 

that all claims that were or could have been brought by Medical Multimedia 

Advertising, Inc. in this lawsuit are dismissed with prejudice; that all 

counterclaims that were or could have been brought by Doctors Practice 

Management, Inc. in this lawsuit are dismissed with prejudice; and that each 

party shall bear its own expenses and attorney fees.

The Court orders that costs be taxed against the party incurring the 

same.
The Court orders that this decision be certified below for observance.

Judgment rendered June 4, 2015.

Per curiam opinion delivered by panel consisting of Chief Justice 

Radack and Justices Higley and Massengale.

WHEREFORE, WE COMMAND YOU to observe the order of our said Court in 

this behalf and in all things to have it duly recognized, obeyed, and executed.

June 16, 2015 

Date CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE

 CLERK OF THE COURT
EXHIBIT 23.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
(Form S-8 No. 333-105797, Form S-8 No. 333-60452 and Form S-8 No. 333-72623)
pertaining to the 1998 Stock Incentive Plan, the Registration Statement (Form
S-8 No. 333-20163) pertaining to the 1996 Stock Incentive Plan and the
Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 033-60819) pertaining to the Stock
Incentive Plan of Paxson Communications Corporation of our report dated March
26, 2004 (except for the second paragraph of Note 20, as to which the date is
March 31, 2004), with respect to the consolidated financial statements and
schedule of Paxson Communications Corporation included in the Annual Report
(Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2003.


                                                /s/ Ernst & Young LLP


Fort Lauderdale, Florida
March 31, 2004