alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
REGISTRANT'S CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AND CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS
FOR THE TWELVE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                           1,072
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   18,122
<ALLOWANCES>                                       226
<INVENTORY>                                     14,309
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                37,233
<PP&E>                                          25,443
<DEPRECIATION>                                  13,413
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  56,476
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           12,477
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            31
<OTHER-SE>                                      32,577
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    56,476
<SALES>                                         53,269
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                53,290
<CGS>                                           37,920
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   37,920
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                14,202
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 620
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    548
<INCOME-TAX>                                       280
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                268
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       268
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.10
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.10
        

</TABLE>
#### Jimmy HARVEY v. STATE of Mississippi.

No. 45145.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

Jan. 27, 1969.

William E. Miller, II, Reuben Anderson, Jackson, for appellant.

Joe T. Patterson, Atty. Gen., by Guy N. Rogers, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jackson, for ap-pellee.

GILLESPIE, Presiding Justice.

This is an appeal from an order of the Circuit Court of Rankin County, Mississippi, overruling a motion to reinstate an appeal to that court from the justice of the peace court. The question for our decision is whether the judge of the circuit court abused his discretion in refusing to reinstate the appeal. The record contains nothing upon which to base a finding of abuse of discretion. The case is affirmed.

Jimmy Harvey was charged in the justice of the peace court with driving an automobile while under the influence of intoxicating beverages. Upon a plea of not guilty he was tried, convicted, and fined; and this appeal was prosecuted. Upon the return day, July 10, 1967, neither the appellant nor his attorney appeared in the circuit court and the appeal was dismissed and a writ of procedendo was issued. On the following day, July 11, attorneys for appellant filed an unsworn motion to reinstate the appeal and stated therein that at the time of the trial in the justice of the peace court appellant was represented by an attorney who is no longer connected with the case and that the principal secretary in the law office representing appellant was on vacation and no one informed appellant’s attorney that the case was scheduled to be called on July 10. It also stated that on the afternoon of the 10th, appellant called the law office representing him and it was then determined that the case was to be called on July 10, 1967, and that no prejudice would be caused by reinstating appeal since criminal trials were not scheduled until the week of July 27. The State did not file any response to the motion, and no proof was offered in support thereof. On July 20, 1967, the motion to reinstate was overruled and this appeal was prosecuted.

The record is devoid of any proof in support of the allegations of the motion to reinstate. Assuming, without deciding, that the allegations of the motion were sufficient as a matter of law to require the *10trial judge to reinstate the appeal, this Court may not find the trial court abused its discretion because no proof was offered in support of the motion. A motion is at issue without any further pleading, and the allegations thereof do not amount to any proof of the facts stated therein. Shaw v. State, 188 Miss. 549, 195 So. 581 (1940). It devolves upon the movant to support his motion by proof. Reed v. State, 143 Miss. 686, 109 So. 715 (1926). In the absence of proof in support of a motion, the presumption in favor of the correctness of the action of the trial court must prevail. Walters v. State, 127 Miss. 324, 90 So. 76 (1921).

There is no basis for a decision by this Court that the trial judge abused his discretion.

Affirmed.

RODGERS, JONES, BRADY and INZ-ER, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 32.1


                          CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND
                          CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                          PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

      In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q
      of Big Time Acquisition,Inc. for the quarter ended February 28,2012
      I, Scot A. Scheer, Chief Executive Officer(Principal Executive
      Officer)and Principal Financial and Accounting Officer of Big Time
      Acquisition,Inc. hereby certify as of the date hereof pursuant to
      Title 18 U.S.C., Chapter 63, Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
      Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my
      knowledge and belief, that:

           1.  Such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
               Februrary 28,2012 fully complies with the requirements
               of section 13(a) or 15(d)as applicable of the Securities
               Exchange Act of 1934; and

           2.  The information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form
               10-Q for the quarter ended February 28,2012 fairly represents
               in all material respects, the financial condition and results
               of operations of Big Time Acquisition, Inc.

     Dated:  April 13,2012



     Big Time Acquisition, Inc.

     By: /s/ Scot A. Scheer
        ----------------------------
        Chief Executive Officer
       (Principal Executive Officer
        and Principal Financial and
        Accounting Officer)
EXHIBIT 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of The Singing Machine Company, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K/A for the year ended March 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Anton Handal, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to The Singing Machine Company, Inc. and will be retained by The Singing Machine Company, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





/S/ Gary AtkinsonGary Atkinson

Chief Executive Officer

(Principal Executive Officer)

Date: March 4, 2011
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1



                          Consent of Ernst & Young LLP


We consent to the incorporation by reference in this Annual Report (Form 10-K)
of Palm Harbor Homes, Inc. and subsidiaries, and in the Registration Statement
(Form S-8 No. 333-24135) pertaining to the Palm Harbor Homes, Inc. Employee
Savings Plan, and in the Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-52535) and in
the related Prospectus of Palm Harbor Homes, Inc. and subsidiaries of our
report dated May 1, 1998, with respect to the consolidated financial statements
included in the 1998 Annual Report to Shareholders of Palm Harbor Homes, Inc.
and subsidiaries.

                                             /s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP



June 10, 1998
Dallas, Texas
#### STATE of Louisiana v. John ROBERTSON.

No. 59603.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Sept. 19, 1977.

Rena M. Price, Orleans Indigent Defender Program, New Orleans, for defendant-appellant.

William J. Guste, Jr., Atty. Gen., Barbara Rutledge, Asst. Atty. Gen., Harry F. Con-nick, Dist. Atty., Robert L. Simmons, Asst. Dist. Atty., for plaintiff-appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
# C_2015428EN.01001002.xml

| 19.12.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 428/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.12.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 428/10

---

Notification of the Government of the Republic of Bulgaria pursuant to Article 10(2) of Directive 2009/73/EC of the European Parliament and the Council (‘Gas Directive’) concerning common rules for the internal market in natural gas regarding the designation of Bulgartransgaz EAD as a transmission system operator in the Republic of Bulgaria

(2015/C 428/08)

Following the Bulgarian regulatory authority’s final decision of 22 June 2015 regarding the certification of Bulgartransgaz EAD as Independent Transmission Operator (Chapter IV of the Gas Directive), Bulgaria has notified to the Commission the official approval and designation of this company as a Transmission System Operator operating in the Republic of Bulgaria in accordance with Article 10 of the Gas Directive.

Any additional information can be obtained at the following address:

| Energy and Water Regulatory Commission |
| --- |
| 8-10, Knyaz Dondukov blvd. |
| Sofia-1000 |
| BULGARIA |
| Website: www.dker.bg |

Energy and Water Regulatory Commission

8-10, Knyaz Dondukov blvd.

Sofia-1000

BULGARIA

Website: www.dker.bg

---
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 35 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 H. R. 35

    To amend title 38, United States Code, to provide that persons 
 considered to be Commonwealth Army veterans by reason of service with 
   the Armed Forces during World War II in the Philippines shall be 
 eligible for full veterans' benefits from the Department of Veterans 
                                Affairs.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 5, 1993

 Mr. Gilman (for himself, Mr. Abercrombie, Mr. Faleomavaega, and Mrs. 
    Mink) introduced the following bill, which was referred to the 
                     Committee on Veterans' Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To amend title 38, United States Code, to provide that persons 
 considered to be Commonwealth Army veterans by reason of service with 
   the Armed Forces during World War II in the Philippines shall be 
 eligible for full veterans' benefits from the Department of Veterans 
                                Affairs.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled, That section 101(2) of 
title 38, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the 
following new sentence: ``Such term includes a person who is a 
Commonwealth Army veteran within the meaning of section 635(1) of this 
title.''.

                                 <all>
```
#### Charles Leslie ROMANS, Appellant, v. Vaughn J. RUDNICK, Judge, Circuit Court, Palm Beach County, Appellee.

No. 73-870.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Aug. 6, 1973.

Mandamus denied.
From: Chin, Conrad <Chin.Conrad@epa.gov>

Sent: Monday, April 01, 2013 8:17 AM

To: John Rego

Cc: French, Chuck; Jeff.McKinney@erametgroup.com; Morales,Roberto; Bradley Nelson; Boyd, Rochelle

Subject: RE: ICR Enclosure 1 responses

Good Morning JohnAny CBI submittal should have been submitted to EPA’s CBI office. I am going to take the CD to the CBI 

office immediately.

Conrad Chin

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

From: John Rego [mailto:jrego@JonesDay.com] 

Sent: Friday, March 29, 2013 3:31 PM 

To: Chin, Conrad 

Cc: French, Chuck; Jeff.McKinney@erametgroup.com 

Subject: Re: ICR Enclosure 1 responses

Thanks Conrad. Just to avoid confusion, the CD you received should have included two copies of the 

EMI responses -- one with CBI (Tables 2A, 2B and 2C) and one without CBI. 

Have a good weekend. 

John 

John Rego • Environmental, Health & Safety

901 LAKESIDE AVENUE • CLEVELAND, OHIO 44114 

DIRECT 216.586.7542 • FAX 216.579.0212 • JREGO@JONESDAY.COM

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

From: "Chin, Conrad" <Chin.Conrad@epa.gov> 

To: "jrego@JonesDay.com" <jrego@JonesDay.com> 

Cc: "Jeff.McKinney@erametgroup.com" <Jeff.McKinney@erametgroup.com>, "French, Chuck" 

<French.Chuck@epa.gov> 

Date: 03/29/2013 03:27 PM 

Subject: ICR Enclosure 1 responses
Hello John- 

 

This is to acknowledge that I received the non-CBI version of the responses today. Thanks. 

 

Conrad Chin 

Sector Policies and Programs Division (D243-02) 

Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards 

US EPA 

Tel. 919-541-1512 

Fax (19-541-3207 

 

==================================================================================== 

This e-mail (including any attachments) may contain information that is private, confidential, or 

protected by attorney-client or other privilege. If you received this e-mail in error, please delete it from 

your system without copying it and notify sender by reply e-mail, so that our records can be corrected. 

=====================================================================================
EXHIBIT 32.2

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                                   PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Josephine Resma, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge,
E-Band Media, Inc.'s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended
September 30, 2010 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in
such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the
financial condition and results of operations of E-Band Media, Inc.

\
Date: 11/11/10                             By: /s/ Josephine Resma
                                               ---------------------------------
                                           Name:  Josephine Resma
                                           Title: Chief Financial Officer
#### The CITIZENS & PEOPLES NATIONAL BANK OF PENSACOLA, etc., Petitioner, v. Lennie Elizabeth PATE, Respondent.

No. 43742.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Dec. 20, 1973.

Rehearing Denied March 8, 1974.

Joe J. Harrell and Donald H. Parting-ton, Harrell, Wiltshire, Bozeman, Clark & Stone, Pensacola, for petitioner.

Charles L. Cetti and Artice L. McGraw, Phillips, Williams, McGraw, Cetti & O’Brien, Pensacola, for respondent.

*712PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of certiorari reflected apparent jurisdiction in this Court. We issued the writ and have heard argument of the parties. Upon further consideration of the matter, we have determined that the cited decisions present no direct conflict as required by Article V, Section 3(b)(3), Florida Constitution, F.S.A. Therefore, the writ must be and is hereby discharged.

It is so ordered.

ROBERTS, ERVIN, ADKINS and BOYD, JJ., concur.

CARLTON, C. J., and McCAIN and DEKLE, JT., dissent.
Exhibit 32.1





Certification Pursuant To


18 U.S.C. Section 1350,


as Adopted Pursuant to


Section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Summit Hotel Properties, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2023 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Jonathan P. Stanner , President, Chief Executive Officer and Director of the Company , certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)  the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(2)  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date: August 2, 2023/s/ Jonathan P. StannerJonathan P. StannerPresident, Chief Executive Officer and Director(principal executive officer)
OFFICE OF THE AlTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS 

AUSTIN 

Thank you ror 

uithwhiehyou enolomtl 

t0 060 Rm0la6 ti 

a6 follwat 

wooaber ax, 1939, 

filea- WaQite . 

cd*, &a part, 

*gi6terila Arohlt4oto 

$-etbeOxkbonon. ana bOrw4 

80 aslt fEliaf rQu 
Mr. Thomm D. Broad, Page 2 

advise us whether or not we have 

against this man, ana ii 60, the 

whleh to proo44U in the matter. .~ - . 

a proper o&de 

prop= ray in 

we do nat want 

to take eotion Illit we mow that we ar4 rigm.- 

Seotion 12 of the Arohiteote' Registration law, 

Artiole 249a, V. A. C. S., reads as toll0u6: 

~Reglstratlon oertlrioate6 or amhlteots ir 

6U6a in 6OOOrdanO6 with thi.6 Aot, Sh#I31 &n ti 

full roroe and erreot until expiration date unlear 

revoked for oauee a6 herein prwld4di 

*The registration orrtiifloate and right if 

ally person t0 praotioe arohiteoture in th%s Stat4 

may be revoked and oanoell4d by any Di6triOt COUrt 

Or this State, in a 6ui8 t8y the 5tate upon t&e.rc 

latlon o? th4 Board of Amhiteotural fEaduaiaex6, 

apen the proof ot the tlelation of the law In my 

mmpeot in regard thereto, or for any 462~60 for 

rhloh the Board of Arohiteotural Rmainera lb authorized to r4fu6e to grant registration oertffioatee, or r0r proor 0r gr066 incmpetcmay, or ior 

reoklesaness In th4 oonetruotlon ot.bulldlnge.on 

the part of the arohiteot %46lgning, p&innAng, or 

6UpeFVi6iXIg the 0066tl-UOtiOU Or altWd&n Of 

6aIE8, or tar diahoneet praotiee on ths part oi the 

YOU Will nQt4 that SU4h 6eOtfOu 18 W&46 it th4 aU8Y 

Of th4 COUIity Or Di6tfiOt AbtOmC#y 843 pFO6OOUte ~h~~4b 8Uit6 

on yeur direotion, and for suoh pargo 6uoh 0ffi44r i6 

your attorney and not the Atkrmo]r 'tinera W %X66. ,lVbre 

ever, we do not believe that it %6 within tMT px6riuo4 ,tO 

aetermins whether or noti evidtmoe id euirlc)isat $0 warrant L 
Mr. Thomas D. Rroad, Page 3 

proseoutlon. Regardless or the way we might deolde and advise you the County or District Attorney or the Jury plight 

believe otherwise. firthemore, WC are or the opinion that 

your honorable Board is better equipped through prof466lOnal 

education and experlenoe to detewlne whether or not the 

arohlteot in question has aaherred to the proper standards 

or a protessional arohlteot, as sat forth in Article 249a 

or the V4rnon1s Annotatea Civil Statutes. 

Consequently, you are reapeotfully advised and It 

it3 the opinion or this Department that the Texas B06Fa of 

Arohlteotaral Examiners in prooe,edlng6 to revoke the reglstratlon oertifloate Of 6 proieselona~ arohlteot for conduct 

withln the oontemplatton Or Ssotion 12 or Art1416 249a 

6houl.d prlnarlly determine ror itsali: whether or not it 

deams proper arohiteotnral stanfyfsrds aa laid down by the 

statute have been d4parted from lo the partlsular 0864, ,4nd 

having 60 aetermin4d It should turn all evidenoe ov4r to 

the proper County or Mstrlot AttOmey ror Droce$d4ngs, pursuant to Section 12, Artlole 249a, of the V4rnon s Aunotated 

Clvlf. statutes. 

Walter R. Kooh 

Aseistant 

w B-4& 

APPROVED JAN 12, 1940 James D. Smullan 

JSrBBB
#### STATE of Florida, Appellant, v. Billy SANDERS, Appellee.

No. 1-342.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. First District.

Oct. 3, 1967.

Rehearing Denied Nov. 15, 1967.

Earl Faircloth, Atty. Gen., George R. Georgieff, Asst. Atty. Gen., and Carl H. Harper, County Sol. for appellant.

Brooks Taylor, Crestview, for appellee.

WIGGINTON, Chief Judge.

This is a companion case to that of State of Florida v. Wolfe, 203 So.2d 338. The *341identical question on appeal is presented in both cases. We have this day filed our opinion in the Wolfe case by which the order quashing the information involved therein is reversed and the cause remanded for further proceedings. On the basis of that decision the similar order appealed in this case is likewise reversed and the cause remanded for further proceedings consistent with the views expressed in the Wolfe decision.

JOHNSON and SPECTOR, JJ., concur.
# C_2015367EN.01001101.xml

| 5.11.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 367/11 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.11.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 367/11

---

SESAR JOINT UNDERTAKING

Publication of the final accounts for the financial year 2014

(2015/C 367/40)

The complete version of the final accounts may be found at the following address:

http://www.sesarju.eu/newsroom/brochures-publications/annual-accounts-2014

---
SERVED SEPTEMBER 23, 2010 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 'SMSPolm' S 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS y'rr npEp/^JIQMS 

WASHINGTON, DC 

m -EP 2U A S: 28 

IN THE MATTER OF 

FEDERAL EXPRESS CORPORATION 

FAA DOCKET NO. CP10NM0008 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

DMS NO. FAA-2010-0792 

NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT OF PROCEEDING 

This proceeding (heretofore designated Case No. 2008NM700280) has been assigned to 

Administrative Law Judge Richard C. Goodwin. All future pleadings and other communications 

regarding this proceeding shall be served on the Judge, the FAA Hearing Docket, and the other 

persons on the attached service list. 

SO ORDERED. 

[onnie A. Yoder 

Chief Administrative Law Jud£ 

Attachment - Service List 
m^''^ >' 

At«/.<F4ADoote(^te|PiOJ 

(Civil Peni^tyli^«%) 

^ V <^. 

ORI 

|H«ffiiig.©ocket 

fpe^rei Aviation Administration 

1800 Indqi^adeaice Avenue, S.W. 

toluDC 20591 

^Atta; tfen g Docket Clerk, AGC-43 

' Vilbvtt Wright Building - Suite |W|f(0O^ 

lid J. Btonczek, President 

'«de«d l^j^ s Corporation, Respondei 

W y Code 7622, Bldg 0,2"''Floor 1 

l^^ i^Jcs Cross Road 

H»* Floor 

: M 38125 

'MS' 

ler-SneU,i?e«7ondenr's i 

llStpJtess Corporation 

rXHvision 

I H«C(b Gross Road 

l|i3 ^ Floor 

Iwapbis^TN 38125 

901-434-8361 

tAX: ^1-434-8283 

. ;CK$ltR,l4yoms, Complainant's Counsel 

* "win Administeation 

lijuntaiii Region, ANM>-7 | .hyn^wJ^^^EWfr^-yi*^") 

6atl^Bfenue,S.W. 1 

•i^>C^^8057 ^ 

,: 4:^5-^7-1417 

' ^ \ 4:15^7-1007 

'SfltviW was by U.S. Mail. For service |i pemwn or by tHq^t^^^vsi^* ^ ^ 

^' Ij ^ AdQilmstration, 600 lnd6peBde|» Av«»^ $;W.^^m»Wti|^ Biiii 

'•tC 20591, Atteation: HearingDo4etCUsik,'A0O4^0.