alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2017316EN.01027501.xml

| 22.9.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 316/275 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.9.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 316/275

---

P8_TA(2015)0281

ILO Forced Labour Convention: social policy ***

European Parliament legislative resolution of 8 September 2015 on the draft Council decision authorising Member States to ratify, in the interests of the European Union, the Protocol of 2014 to the Forced Labour Convention, 1930, of the International Labour Organisation with regard to matters related to social policy (06732/2015 — C8-0079/2015 — 2014/0259(NLE))

(Consent)

(2017/C 316/34)

The European Parliament,

The European Parliament

| — | having regard to the draft Council decision (06732/2015), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the draft Council decision (06732/2015),

| — | having regard to the request for consent submitted by the Council in accordance with Article 153(2), in conjunction with Article 153(1)(a) and (b), Article 218(6), second subparagraph, point (a)(v) and Article 218(8) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (C8-0079/2015), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the request for consent submitted by the Council in accordance with Article 153(2), in conjunction with Article 153(1)(a) and (b), Article 218(6), second subparagraph, point (a)(v) and Article 218(8) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (C8-0079/2015),

| — | having regard to the Protocol of 2014 to the Forced Labour Convention, 1930, of the International Labour Organisation; |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the Protocol of 2014 to the Forced Labour Convention, 1930, of the International Labour Organisation;

| — | having regard to Rule 99(1), first and third subparagraphs, Rule 99(2), and Rule 108(7) of its Rules of Procedure, |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to Rule 99(1), first and third subparagraphs, Rule 99(2), and Rule 108(7) of its Rules of Procedure,

| — | having regard to the recommendation of the Committee on Employment and Social Affairs (A8-0243/2015), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the recommendation of the Committee on Employment and Social Affairs (A8-0243/2015),

| 1. | Gives its consent to the draft Council decision; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Gives its consent to the draft Council decision;

| 2. | Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council, the Commission and the governments and parliaments of the Member States. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council, the Commission and the governments and parliaments of the Member States.

---
I am joining Alaska Airlines in its effort to provide convenient service from 

Portland to our nation's capital.

Docket No. DOT-OST-2012-0029

Dear Secretary LaHood:

I am writing in support of the application of Alaska Airlines, Inc. to provide a daily 

direct flight to Reagan National Airport (DCA) from Portland International Airport 

(PDX). I believe that Alaska is the right choice. With their large Portland hub 

presence, strong customer service focus and track record for operational reliability, 

the carrier is best suited to provide a nonstop PDX to DCA flight.

Portland is the second largest market to the Washington DC area without nonstop 

service to DCA. With a nonstop route from PDX to DCA, Oregon and S.W. 

Washington residents will no longer be forced to use more time-consuming and 

less convenient service to our nation's capital.

I respectfully urge you to grant Alaska Airlines' application to serve PDX-DCA.

Kenneth Michael Cowden

Portland, Oregon
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-1672

FATOUMATA O. CONTE,

Petitioner,

versus

U.S. IMMIGRATION & NATURALIZATION SERVICE;

JOHN ASHCROFT, Attorney General,

Respondents.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration

Appeals. (A71-800-527)

Submitted: February 7, 2003 Decided: March 12, 2003

Before WILKINS, Chief Judge, and NIEMEYER and KING, Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

John T. Riely, Bethesda, Maryland, for Petitioner. Robert D.

McCallum, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, Carl H. McIntyre, Jr.,

Senior Litigation Counsel, John L. Davis, Office of Immigration

Litigation, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C.,

for Respondents.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Fatoumata O. Conte seeks review of the Board of Immigration

Appeals’ (“Board”) decision and order affirming without opinion the

immigration judge’s denial of her second motion to reopen

immigration proceedings, which she labeled as a “Motion to Accept

the Affirmative Application for Relief Nunc Pro Tunc.” We have

reviewed the administrative record and the immigration judge’s

decision, which was designated by the Board as the final agency

determination, and find no abuse of discretion. See 8 C.F.R.

§ 3.2(a) (2002); INS v. Doherty, 502 U.S. 314, 323-24 (1992).

Accordingly, we deny Conte’s petition for review. We dispense with

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                      61,748,788
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               31,437,591
<ALLOWANCES>                                 1,576,593
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            95,835,370
<PP&E>                                     180,211,612
<DEPRECIATION>                              35,796,200
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             543,182,460
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       19,634,533
<BONDS>                                    227,655,096
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                      184,709,646
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        48,754
<OTHER-SE>                                 106,726,483
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               543,182,460
<SALES>                                    144,497,611
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           144,497,611
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              144,620,842
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             5,159,491
<LOSS-PROVISION>                             1,287,819
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          31,608,725
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (26,572,465)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (26,572,465)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 353,564
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (26,218,901)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (1.10)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (1.10)
        

</TABLE>
eworld_ex45.htm


EXHIBIT 4.5


 


The terms of Type A Warrants issued by the Company pursuant to oral agreements are as follows:







All U.S. and non-U.S. Holders ofType A Warrants that were issued as part of new member entry package for new members have three options:








	
  

	
·

	
Exchange the Warrant at Face Value for Additional Products












The aggregate amount of Additional Products which can be acquired upon exchange of all issued and outstanding Type A Warrants is $11,777,088, of which $1,253,284 can be issued to U.S. holders of Type A Warrants








	
  

	
§

	
Note:  Of the Type A Warrants, certain of the Warrants may be exchanged for 1.5 times the face amount for additional products and certain of the Warrants may only be exchanged for the face amount for additional products.  The amounts set forth in the above calculation and similar calculations in this section reflect the aggregate amount of products which can be acquired upon the exchange of either type of Type A Warrant.













	
  

	
·

	
Cancel their Membership and Request a Refund at Face Value less amounts paid out by the Company as bonuses to upline members upon a new person agreeing to become a member.













	
  

	
o

	
The aggregate amount of refunds which would be required to be made upon cancellation of membership and related refund requests for all issued and outstanding Type A Warrants is $8,169,708, .  The aggregate amount of bonuses paid out by the Company to upline members upon a new person agreeing to become a member was $3,607,380.













	
  

	
·

	
Elect the right under the Warrant to exchange their certificate for no additional consideration and receive a set amount of shares of common stock of the Company upon a going public event in the U.S., as specified in the Warrant.













	
  

	
o

	
The aggregate amount of additional shares of Common Stock which can be acquired upon exercise of this option under all issued and outstanding Type A Warrants is 24,167,304 shares, of which 2,340,388 shares of Common Stock can be acquired by 546 holders of Type A Warrants who are U.S. citizens or residents.  The remaining shares can be acquired by non-U.S. residents.  Those shares are not part of this offering.







 


No special offering of securities or product or the cancellation/refund offer is being made or being contemplated by the Company for its non-U.S. residents.  The non-U.S. residents can receive those benefits in their sole discretion as currently available to them under the terms of the Type A Warrants.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME AND CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                             381
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   13,607
<ALLOWANCES>                                       244
<INVENTORY>                                     12,423
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                28,579
<PP&E>                                          61,434
<DEPRECIATION>                                  34,747
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  59,618
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           24,856
<BONDS>                                          3,168
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         3,167
<OTHER-SE>                                      13,725
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    13,703
<SALES>                                         90,416
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                90,416
<CGS>                                           69,731
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   69,731
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,075
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,939)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (806)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (1,133)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,133)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.72)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.72)


</TABLE>
EX-10.13



 Exhibit 10.13 

LEASE AMENDMENT NUMBER ONE 

THIS LEASE AMENDMENT NUMBER ONE this (“Amendment”) is dated as of June 11, 2013 and entered into by and between Mooreland
Investors, LP, successor in interest to UCM/Proventure-Synergy Business Park, L.LC (“Landlord”) and Franklin Synergy Bank. (“Tenant”) with its principal office at 722 Columbia Ave Franklin, TN 37064. Tenant and
Landlord, or Landlord’s predecessor in interest, executed a Lease dated October 8, 2008 (the “Lease”). Tenant and Landlord desire to alter and modify the Lease for good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of
which hereby are acknowledged, the Lease is amended as follows 
 1. Expiration Date. November 30, 2014 

2. Monthly Base Rent. Effective December 1, 2013, the Monthly Base Rent shall be as outlined in the rent schedule below: 

 

					
	 Monthly Base Rent Schedule
	  	Monthly Base Rent	 
	 December 1, 2013 through November 30, 2014
	  	$	7,054.42	  

 3. Condition of the Premises. Tenant shall accept the Premises in their “as is” condition. Any modifications
or renovations to the Premises will be at Tenant’s sole cost. 
 4. Operating Expenses: Tenant’s 2008 Base Year will remain unchanged and
Tenant will continue to pay the current monthly estimate for operating expenses of $216.00/mo in addition to the Base Rent amount outlined above. 
 Except
as specifically amended and modified by this Amendment, the parties hereby ratify and confirm that all other terms of the Lease are and shall remain in full force and effect Capitalized terms used herein and not otherwise defined shall have the
respective meanings assigned thereto in the Lease. 
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Landlord and Tenant have executed or caused to be executed this Amendment on the
dates shown below their signatures to be effective as of the date set forth above. 
  

									
	LANDLORD:	 		 	TENANT:
			
	MOORELAND INVESTORS, LP	 		 	Franklin Synergy Bank
		 		 	A Tennessee state chartered bank
			
	A Tennessee limited partnership	 		 	
		 		 	By:	 	 




  

					
	By:	 	BNM Corporation	 		 	Print Name:	 	 Kevin Herrington

					
		 	its General Partner	 		 	Title:	 	 SVP, COO

				
		 		 	Date:	 	 6/11/13

				
	By:	 	 




  
	 		 	
				
	Its:	 	 Manager
I

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 3857

To permit the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency to

enter into cooperative research and development agreements for environmental protection.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

FEBRUARY 10, 1994

Mr. OLVER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee

on Science, Space, and Technology

A BILL

To permit the Administrator of the Environmental Protection

Agency to enter into cooperative research and development agreements for environmental protection.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. AUTHORITY TO ENTER INTO COOPERATIVE RE4 SEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENTS.

5 The Administrator of the Environmental Protection

6 Agency may, subject to section 2, enter into cooperative

7 research and development agreements with colleges and

8 universities, environmental protection agencies of the sev9 eral States, and nonprofit organizations to participate in
2

•HR 3857 IH

1 a cooperative research unit to develop adequate, coordi2 nated, cooperative research and training programs relat3 ing to the protection of the environment.

4 SEC. 2. LIMITATIONS.

5 The participation of the Environmental Protection

6 Agency in a cooperative research unit under an agreement

7 referred to in section 1 shall be limited to the following:

8 (1) The assignment by the Administrator of sci9 entific personnel of the Environmental Protection

10 Agency to serve at the cooperative research unit

11 under the terms of the agreement.

12 (2) The provision of assistance (including rea13 sonable financial compensation) for the work of re14 searchers on environmental protection projects con15 ducted pursuant to the agreement.

16 (3) The provision, for the use of the cooperative

17 research unit in carrying out its purposes under the

18 agreement, of any equipment available to the Sec19 retary for such purposes.

20 (4) The payment of incidental expenses of the

21 personnel of the Environmental Protection Agency

22 and of employees of any other entity assigned to the

23 cooperative research unit under the agreement.

Æ
N O T FO R PUB L ICAT IO N UNITED STATES C OUR T OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH C IR C UIT
JUAN PAB LO LONDONOGUTIER R EZ, Pe titione r,
v. ER IC H. HOLDER , Jr., Attorne y Ge ne ra l, R

e sponde n t . No. 11-73027 Age n c y No. A098-569-190
M EM O R ANDUM *

On Pe tition for Re vie w of a n Orde r of the B oa rd of Im m igration Appe a ls Subm itte d

Nove m b e r 18, 2014 ** B e fore : LEAVY, FISHER , a nd N.R . SM ITH, C irc uit Judge s. Jua n Pa b l o Londono-Gutierre z , a native and c itiz e n of C o lom bia , pe titions for re vie w of the B o a

rd of Im m igration Appe a ls’ (“ B IA” ) orde r dism issing his
a ppe a l from

an im m igration judge ’ s (“ IJ” ) de c ision de ny ing his a pplic a tion for 

# F IL ED NOV 24 2014 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U
. S. CO URT O F APPEALS

* This disposition is not a ppropria te for public a t ion a

nd is not pre c e de nt e xc e pt a s provide d

by 9th C ir. R . 36-3. ** The pa

ne l una nim ously c onc lude s this c a se is suita ble for de c ision without ora l a

rgum e nt. Se e Fe d. R . App. P. 34(a )(2).a sy lum and withholding of re m ova l . W e have jurisdic tion unde r 8 U.S.C . § 1252. W e grant the pe tition for re vie w a n d re m and. In de ny ing Londono-Gutie rre z ’ s a sy lum

and withholding of re

m ova l c la im s, the a ge nc y found Londono-Gutie rre z fa i le d to e sta

blish pa s t pe rse c ution or a fe ar of future pe rse c ution on a c c ount of a prote c te d ground. W

he n the IJ a

nd B IA issue d the ir de c isions in this c a se , the y did not ha

v e the be ne fit of this c ourt’ s de c isions in H

e nrique z -Riv as v . Holde r , 707 F.3d 1081 (9th C ir. 2013) (e n ba nc ), C ordoba v . Holde r , 726 F.3d 1106 (9th C ir. 2013), a nd Pirir-Boc v . Holde r , 750 F.3d 1077 (9th C ir. 2014), or theB IA’ s de c isions in Matte r of M-E-V-G- , 26 I. & N. De c . 227 (B IA 2014), a nd Matte r of W

-G-R- , 26 I. & N. De c . 208 (B IA 2014). Thus, we re m and Londono-Gutie rre z ’ s a sy l um

and withholding of re

m ova l c la im s to de te rm ine the im

pa c t, if a ny , of the se de c isions. Se e IN S v . Ve n tura , 537 U.S. 12, 16-18 (2002) (pe r c uriam ). In light of this c onc lusion, wedo not re a c h Londono-Gutierre z ’ s re m a ining
c onte ntions re g arding his a sy lum and withholding of re

m ova l c la im s at this time . PE T IT IO N FO R RE V IE WG RANT E D; RE M ANDE D .

1 1
- 7 3 0 2 7 2
# C_2013361EN.01000801.xml

| 11.12.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 361/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.12.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 361/8

---

Calls for proposals under the multi-annual work programme 2013 for grants in the field of the Trans-European Transport Network (TEN-T) for the period 2007-13

(Commission Decision C(2013) 1675 as amended by Commission Decision C(2013) 8755)

2013/C 361/05

The European Commission, Directorate-General for Mobility and Transport is hereby launching five calls for proposals, under the multi-annual work programme for the Trans-European Transport Network (TEN-T) for the period 2007-13, in order to award grants to the following fields:

| — | Actions on Priority Projects (PPs) — the indicative amount available for the selected proposals is EUR 50 million, |
| --- | --- |

—

Actions on Priority Projects (PPs) — the indicative amount available for the selected proposals is EUR 50 million,

| — | Motorways of the Sea (MoS) — the indicative amount available for the selected proposals is EUR 80 million, |
| --- | --- |

—

Motorways of the Sea (MoS) — the indicative amount available for the selected proposals is EUR 80 million,

| — | European Rail Traffic Management Systems (ERTMS) — the indicative amount available for the selected proposals is EUR 70 million, |
| --- | --- |

—

European Rail Traffic Management Systems (ERTMS) — the indicative amount available for the selected proposals is EUR 70 million,

| — | Air Traffic Management (ATM) — the indicative amount available for the selected proposals is EUR 30 million, |
| --- | --- |

—

Air Traffic Management (ATM) — the indicative amount available for the selected proposals is EUR 30 million,

| — | Intelligent Transport Systems (ITS) — the indicative amount available for the selected proposals is EUR 50 million. |
| --- | --- |

—

Intelligent Transport Systems (ITS) — the indicative amount available for the selected proposals is EUR 50 million.

The deadline for the submission of proposals is 17 March 2014.

17 March 2014

The complete texts of the calls for proposals are available online

(http://tentea.ec.europa.eu/en/apply_for_funding/follow_the_funding_process/calls_for_proposals_2013.htm).

---
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pa ne l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l a r g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T ZA TREA EV A N S, P la in tif

f - A p p e lla n t, v. ALLI EDBART ON SE CURI TY S E R V I C E S L L P ; e t a l., D efen d an t s - A p p el l ees. N o. 10- 15264 D . C . N o . 3 : 0 8 - c v - 0 4 9 9 3 - MMC ME MOR AN DU M *

A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt f o rth e N o rth e rn D is tr ic t o f C a lif o rn ia M a xi ne M . C he s ne y , D i s tr i c tJudge , P r e s i di ng S ubm i tt e d A ugus t11, 2011 ** B efo re: T H O M A S , S IL V E R M A N , an dC L IF T O N , C i rcu i tJu d g es. Z atre a E vans appeal s f

rom the di stri ctcourt ’ s j ud gm entdi sm i ss i ng her a c tio n a lle g in g s ta te la w e m p lo y m e n t c la im s a n dits o r d e rd e n y in g h e rm o tio n to r e m a n dth e a c tio n to s ta te c o u rt. W e h a v e ju r is d ic tio n u n d e r2 8 U .S .C . § 1 2 9 1 . 

# FI LED AU G 17 2011 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS10- 15264 2 W e r e vi e w de novo the di s tr i c tc ourt ’ s or de rde ny i ng the m ot i on t o r e m a nd, a nd f or c le a re rr o rits u n d e r ly in g f a c tu a l f in d in g s . U

n i ted C o m p u ter S ys. , In c. v. A T&T C o rp . , 2 9 8 F. 3 d7 5 6 , 7 6 0 ( 9 th Ci r . 2 0 0 2 ) . W e a f f i rm. T he di s tr i c tc ourtdi d notc l e a r l ye rrbyf i ndi ng tha tE va ns w a s s ubj e c tt o a c ol l e c t i ve ba r ga i ni ng a gr e e m e ntdur i ng the r e l e va ntt i m e pe r i od i n l i ghtof defe nd ant s’ evi dence and E vans’ s ow n al l egat i on s r ef er enci ng “ un i on rul es . ” A c c o r d i n g l y , th e d i s tr i c tc o u rtp r o p e r l yd e n i e dth e mo t i o n t o r e ma n db e c au s e s o me of E va ns ’ s c l a i m s w e r e c om pl e t e l ypr e e m pt e d unde r§ 301 of the L abor M a n a g e m e n t R e la tio n s A c t ( “L M R A ” ) , se e Cr am e rv . C ons ol. Fr e i ghtw ays , I

nc ., 255 F . 3d 683, 6 9 3 ( 9 th C ir . 2 0 0 1 ) ( e n b a n c ) , a n dth u s th e s e c la im s w e r e r e m o v ab le to f e d e r a l c o u rt, s e e B e ne

f i c i al N at ’ l B ank v . A nde rs on , 5 3 9 U .S . 1 , 6 - 7 ( 2 0 0 3 ) . E va ns ’ s non- pr e e m pt e d s t a t e l a w c l a i m s w e r e a l s o r e m ovabl e unde rthe s u p p le m e n ta l ju r is d ic tio n s ta tu te . Se e id. a t8 n. 3. E vans’ s r em ai ni ng cont ent i on s are un pers uasi ve. AF F I RME D.