alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A19A0090. SHANNON BRADLEY v. THE STATE.

In 2009, a jury found Shannon Bradley guilty of five counts each of armed

robbery and aggravated assault with intent to rob and one count of possession of a

firearm during the commission of a felony. The trial court merged the armed robbery

convictions with the aggravated assault convictions and imposed a total sentence of

life in prison without the possibility of parole. We affirmed Bradley’s judgment of

conviction on direct appeal in an unpublished opinion. See Bradley v. State,

No. A12A0526 (May 9, 2012).

In November 2017, Bradley filed two motionsseeking to challenge the legality

of his convictions: a motion to set aside judgment and a motion in arrest of judgment. 

The trial court denied both motions in a single order entered on November 22, 2017. 

The court’s November 22 order also directed the trial court clerk not to accept any

further filings in this case. On April 10, 2018, Bradley filed a “Notice of Out of Time

Appeal,” seeking review of the trial court’s November 22 order.1 We lack

jurisdiction.

1 Bradley’s “Notice of Out of Time Appeal” is dated February 22, 2018, but

was not filed in the trial court until April 10, 2018. In his “Notice of Out of Time

Appeal,” Bradley indicates that he first learned in January or February 2018 that his

November 2017 motions had been denied. If, as he appears to suggest, his right to

timely seek appellate review was frustrated due to a trial court error, his remedy is to

petition the trial court to vacate and re-enter the order at issue in the manner described

in Cambron v. Canal Ins. Co., 246 Ga. 147, 148-149 (1) (269 SE2d 426) (1980).

August 23, 2018
Pretermitting whether a direct appeal may lie from the trial court’s November

22 order, a notice of appeal must be filed within 30 days of entry of the order sought

to be appealed. OCGA § 5-6-38 (a). The proper and timely filing of a notice of

appeal is an absolute requirement to confer jurisdiction on this Court. Rowland v.

State, 264 Ga. 872, 872 (1) (452 SE2d 756) (1995). Bradley’s “Notice of Out of

Time Appeal” is untimely, as it was filed 139 days after entry of the order he seeks

to appeal. To the extent that Bradley seeks an out-of-time appeal, (a) any such

request must be directed to the trial court, see Gulledge v. State, 276 Ga. 740, 742

(583 SE2d 862) (2003), and (b) regardless, an out-of-time appeal is not available to

a criminal defendant who already has had a direct appeal, see Richards v. State, 275

Ga. 190, 191 (563 SE2d 856) (2002). Consequently, this untimely appeal is hereby

DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

08/23/2018
|   | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company. |
|--------|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                          |   |                                                          |   |
|-------------------------------|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Date:  May 16, 2011 |   | /s/ LI Jiantao                                                |   |
|                          |   | LI Jiantao                                                    |   |
|                          |   | Title: Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer       |   |
|                          |   | (Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer) |   |

----
# C_2012317EN.01000201.xml

| 20.10.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 317/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.10.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 317/2

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

19 October 2012

2012/C 317/03

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,3035 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 103,27 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4590 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,81275 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 8,5717 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,2085 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 7,3840 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 24,823 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 279,30 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,6963 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,1070 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,5833 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,3445 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,2586 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,2885 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 10,1029 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,5910 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,5914 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 439,17 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 11,2411 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 8,1514 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,5425 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 12 526,16 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 3,9785 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 53,921 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 40,1888 |
| THB | Thai baht | 40,044 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 2,6440 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 16,7871 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 70,1800 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,3035

JPY

Japanese yen

103,27

DKK

Danish krone

7,4590

GBP

Pound sterling

0,81275

SEK

Swedish krona

8,5717

CHF

Swiss franc

1,2085

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

7,3840

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

24,823

HUF

Hungarian forint

279,30

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,6963

PLN

Polish zloty

4,1070

RON

Romanian leu

4,5833

TRY

Turkish lira

2,3445

AUD

Australian dollar

1,2586

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,2885

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

10,1029

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,5910

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,5914

KRW

South Korean won

1 439,17

ZAR

South African rand

11,2411

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

8,1514

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,5425

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

12 526,16

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

3,9785

PHP

Philippine peso

53,921

RUB

Russian rouble

40,1888

THB

Thai baht

40,044

BRL

Brazilian real

2,6440

MXN

Mexican peso

16,7871

INR

Indian rupee

70,1800

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

August 29, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 130903 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman, SHAWN DEMEAN HARRIS, Justices 

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

v SC: 130903 

 COA: 264220 
 Wayne CC: 05-518486-AH

DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS,

Defendant-Appellee. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the March 30, 2006 order 

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded 

that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

d0821 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

August 29, 2006 

 Clerk
```

[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 151 (Tuesday, August 6, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Pages 47698-47699]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-18987]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS EXAMINATION COUNCIL

[Docket No. AS13-18]

Appraisal Subcommittee Notice of Meeting

AGENCY: Appraisal Subcommittee of the Federal Financial Institutions 
Examination Council.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DESCRIPTION: In accordance with Section 1104 (b) of Title XI of the 
Financial Institutions Reform, Recovery, and Enforcement Act of 1989, 
as amended, notice is hereby given that the Appraisal Subcommittee 
(ASC) will meet in open session for its regular meeting:

LOCATION: OCC--400 7th Street SW., Washington, DC 20024.

DATE: August 14, 2013.

TIME: 10:30 a.m.

STATUS: Open.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: 

Summary Agenda

July 10, 2013 minutes--Open Session
    (No substantive discussion of the above items is anticipated. These 
matters will be resolved with a single vote unless a member of the ASC 
requests that an item be moved to the discussion agenda.)

Discussion Agenda:

ASC 2014-18 Strategic Plan
Delaware Compliance Review
District of Columbia Compliance Review
Update on the Implementation of the Policy Statements

How to Attend and Observe an ASC Meeting

    Email your name, organization and contact information to 
meetings@asc.gov. You may also send a written request via U.S. Mail, 
fax or commercial carrier to the Executive Director of the ASC, 1401 H 
Street NW., Ste 760, Washington, DC 20005. The fax number is 202-289-
4101. Your request must be received no later than 4:30 p.m., ET, on the 
Monday prior to the meeting. Attendees must have a valid government-
issued photo ID and must agree to submit to reasonable security 
measures. The meeting space is intended to accommodate public 
attendees. However, if the space will not accommodate all requests, the 
ASC may refuse attendance on that reasonable basis. The use of any 
video or audio tape recording device, photographing device, or any 
other electronic or mechanical device designed for similar purposes is 
prohibited at ASC meetings.

[[Page 47699]]

    Dated: August 1, 2013.
James R. Park,
Executive Director.
[FR Doc. 2013-18987 Filed 8-5-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
```
# C_2015191EN.01000601.xml

| 9.6.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 191/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.6.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 191/6

---

Notice for the attention of the data subjects to whom the restrictive measures provided for in Council Regulation (EC) No 329/2007 concerning restrictive measures against the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea apply

(2015/C 191/05)

The attention of data subjects is drawn to the following information in accordance with Article 12 of Regulation (EC) No 45/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council (1):

1

The legal basis for this processing operation is Council Regulation (EC) No 329/2007 (2).

2

The controller of this processing operation is the Council of the European Union represented by the Director General of DG C (Foreign Affairs, Enlargement, Civil Protection) of the General Secretariat of the Council and the department entrusted with the processing operation is the Unit 1C of DG C that can be contacted at:

| Council of the European Union |
| --- |
| General Secretariat |
| DG C 1C |
| Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175 |
| 1048 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |
| E-mail: sanctions@consilium.europa.eu |

Council of the European Union

General Secretariat

DG C 1C

Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175

1048 Bruxelles/Brussel

BELGIQUE/BELGIË

E-mail: sanctions@consilium.europa.eu

The purpose of the processing operation is the establishment and updating of the list of persons subject to restrictive measures in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 329/2007.

The data subjects are the natural persons who fulfil the listing criteria as laid down in that Regulation.

The personal data collected includes data necessary for the correct identification of the person concerned, the Statement of Reasons and any other data related thereto.

The personal data collected may be shared as necessary with the European External Action Service and the Commission.

Without prejudice to restrictions provided for in Article 20(1)(a) and (d) of Regulation (EC) No 45/2001, requests for access, as well as requests for rectification or objection will be answered in accordance with Section 5 of Council Decision 2004/644/EC (3).

3

Personal data will be retained for 5 years from the moment the data subject has been removed from the list of persons subject to the asset freeze or the validity of the measure has expired, or for the duration of court proceedings in the event they had been started.

Data subjects may have recourse to the European Data Protection Supervisor in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 45/2001.

---

(1)  OJ L 8, 12.1.2001, p. 1.

1

(2)  OJ L 88, 29.3.2007, p. 1.

2

(3)  OJ L 296, 21.9.2004, p. 16.

3

---
# C_2017399EN.01021101.xml

| 24.11.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 399/211 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.11.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 399/211

---

P8_TA(2015)0426

EU-Vanuatu agreement on the short-stay visa waiver ***

European Parliament legislative resolution of 15 December 2015 on the draft Council decision on the conclusion, on behalf of the European Union, of the Agreement between the European Union and the Republic of Vanuatu on the short-stay visa waiver (07192/2015 — C8-0149/2015 — 2015/0052(NLE))

(Consent)

(2017/C 399/31)

The European Parliament,

The European Parliament

| — | having regard to the draft Council decision (07192/2015), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the draft Council decision (07192/2015),

| — | having regard to the draft Agreement between the European Union and the Republic of Vanuatu on the short-stay visa waiver (07119/2015), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the draft Agreement between the European Union and the Republic of Vanuatu on the short-stay visa waiver (07119/2015),

| — | having regard to the request for consent submitted by the Council in accordance with Article 77(2)(a) and Article 218(6), second subparagraph, point (a)(v), of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (C8-0149/2015), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the request for consent submitted by the Council in accordance with Article 77(2)(a) and Article 218(6), second subparagraph, point (a)(v), of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (C8-0149/2015),

| — | having regard to Rule 99(1), first and third subparagraphs, Rule 99(2) and Rule 108(7) of its Rules of Procedure, |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to Rule 99(1), first and third subparagraphs, Rule 99(2) and Rule 108(7) of its Rules of Procedure,

| — | having regard to the recommendation of the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs (A8-0329/2015), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the recommendation of the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs (A8-0329/2015),

| 1. | Gives its consent to conclusion of the agreement; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Gives its consent to conclusion of the agreement;

| 2. | Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council, the Commission and the governments and parliaments of the Member States and of the Republic of Vanuatu. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council, the Commission and the governments and parliaments of the Member States and of the Republic of Vanuatu.

---
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential. 

# Wuiteb**~tate11 ~ourt**  

# of**~peaI11** 

# for tbejfeberaI ([ircuit
AIMEE KOLZE, Petitioner, 

### v. SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, Respondent.

2012-3163 Petition for review of an arbitrator's decision in case no. BW-2011-R-0017 by Joshua M. Javits. 

### ON MOTION Before DYK, 

### Circuit Judge. 

### ORDER Aimee Kolze moves to remand for clarification of the arbitrator's decision. The Social Security Administration opposes. We deem it the better course to deny the motion and for Kolze to present any arguments for remand in her brief. Case: 12-3163 Document: 18 Page: 1 Filed: 09/28/2012AIMEE KOLZE V. SOCIAL SECURITYADMINISTRATION Upon consideration thereof, IT Is ORDERED THAT: The motion is denied. FOR THE COURT 2



## SEP 282012 Date

cc: Richard R. Klein, Esq. Jane C. Dempsey, Esq. s26 /s/ Jan Horbaly Jan Horbaly Clerk

## ~'f~FOR UJ. 11iEFEDERALCIRCUIT 

### SEP 28 201Z**~NHORBAl.Y** 

## ClERK Case: 12-3163 Document: 18 Page: 2 Filed: 09/28/2012
#### James FORREST, Petitioner, v. BOARD OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION OF BROWARD COUNTY et al., Respondents.

No. 44559.

Supreme Court of Florida.

March 27, 1974.

Certiorari denied.

ADKINS, C. J., and ROBERTS, BOYD, McCAIN and DEKLE, JJ., concur.
**UN PUBLISHED** 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 14** 
**- 1877** 

In re: WILLIAM H. EVANS, JR. ,

Petitioner

.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus

. ( 1:14

- cv
- 01015

- AJT

- IDD )

Submitted : September 23, 2014 Decided: September 25, 2014

Before NIEMEYER and GREGORY , Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Petition denied by un published per curiam opinion

.

William H. Evans, Jr. , Petitioner Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM:
William H. Evans, Jr., petitions this court for a writ
of mandamus, seeking an order directing the district court to

file his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2012) petition . Our review of the

district court’s docket reveals that the district court entered
Evans’ petition on August 7, 2014
**.** Accordingly, because Evans

has received the relief he seeks, we grant leave to proceed in
forma pauperis and deny the mandamus petition as moot. We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before

th is court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED
I

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 3779

To end the purchase of House calendars, and for other purposes.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

FEBRUARY 2, 1994

Mr. INGLIS of South Carolina introduced the following bill; which was referred

to the Committee on House Administration

A BILL

To end the purchase of House calendars, and for other

purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act shall be cited as the ‘‘End Purchase of

5 House Calendars Act’’.

6 SEC. 2. END PURCHASE OF HOUSE CALENDARS.

7 No funds shall be appropriated for the purchase of

8 House calendars from the Capitol Historical Society or

9 any other source and no funds shall be used in administer10 ing or distributing House calendars for fiscal year 1995

11 and any future fiscal years.
2

HR 3779 IH

1 SEC. 3. CALENDAR MAILING.

2 No funds shall be appropriated for the mailing of cal3 endars and no funds shall be used in administering the

4 mailing of calendars for fiscal year 1995 and any future

5 fiscal years.

Æ
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3640 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3640

 To direct the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency to 
  establish an office in a community in the United States located not 
   more than 10 miles from the border between the United States and 
                                Mexico.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           November 22, 1993

  Mr. Filner introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
               Committee on Merchant Marine and Fisheries

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To direct the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency to 
  establish an office in a community in the United States located not 
   more than 10 miles from the border between the United States and 
                                Mexico.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ESTABLISHMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY OFFICE ON 
              UNITED STATES-MEXICO BORDER.

    (a) Establishment.--Not later than 1 year after the date of the 
enactment of this Act, the Administrator of the Environmental 
Protection Agency shall establish an office in a community in the 
United States that is--
            (1) located in the area of the United States that is not 
        more than 10 miles from the border between the United States 
        and Mexico, and
            (2) the largest city in that area.
    (b) Regional Administrator.--The head of the office established 
under this section shall be the Regional Administrator of the 
Environmental Protection Agency for the region of the United States 
located generally along the border between the United States and 
Mexico.
    (c) Functions.--The Administrator of the Environmental Protection 
Agency shall delegate to the Regional Administrator referred to in 
subsection (b) the functions of the Administrator relating to--
            (1) administering activities conducted by the Environmental 
        Protection Agency in the region of the United States located 
        generally along the border between the United States and 
        Mexico; and
            (2) coordinating, and cooperating with the Government of 
        Mexico in, the implementation of programs of the Environmental 
        Protection Agency relating to transboundary hazardous waste and 
        air, soil, and water quality problems, including--
                    (A) programs to counter impacts of trade agreements 
                between the United States and Mexico, and
                    (B) programs conducted pursuant to the 1983 Border 
                Environmental Agreement between the United States and 
                Mexico.

                                 <all>
```
|   | (1) | the Amendment No. 1 to the Form 10-Q of On-Air Impact, Inc., a Nevada corporation (the “Registrant”), for the fiscal quarter ended February 28, 2011 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant. |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date: July 1, 2011 | /s/ Dorothy Whitehouse             |
|------------------------------|----------------------------------------------|
|                         | Dorothy Whitehouse                           |
|                         | President and Chief Executive Officer        |
|                         | (Principal Executive Officer)                |
|                         | (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) |

----
#### Henry ROBINSON v. STATE of Mississippi.

No. 50344.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

May 10, 1978.

Rehearing Denied July 12, 1978.

Brown, Alexander & Sanders, Firnist J. Alexander, Jr., Jackson, for appellant.

A. F. Summer, Atty. Gen. by Billy L. Gore, Sp. Asst. Atty. Gen., Jackson, for appellee.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Adams County; Lenox L. Forman, Judge.

Before ROBERTSON, P. J., and WALKER and COFER, JJ.

AFFIRMED.

PATTERSON, C. J., SMITH, P. J., and SUGG, BROOM, LEE and BOWLING, JJ., concur.