Nevada - Rest of the St

Minnesota yes 

Michigan - Class I areas yes 

Massachusetts 

Illinois yes 

Hawaii yes 

Guam 

District of Columbia 

California - Yolo-Solano AQMD 

California - Ventura County APCD 

California - Tuolumne County APCD 

California - Tehama County APCD 

California - South Coast AQMD yes 

California - Siskiyou County APCD 

California - Shasta County AQMD 

California - Santa Barbara County APCD 

California - San Luis Obispo County APCD 

California - San Joaquin Valley APCD 

California - San Diego County APCD 

California - Placer County APCD 

California - Northern Sierra AQMD 

California - Mojave Desert AQMD 

California - Modoc County APCD 

California - Mariposa County APCD 

California - Lassen County APCD 

California - Lake County AQMD 

California - Imperial County APCD 

California - Great Basin Unified APCD 

California - Glenn County APCD 

California - Feather River AQMD 

California - El Dorado County AQMD 

California - Eastern Kern APCD 

California - Colusa County APCD 

California  Calaveras County APCD 

ate (NDEP) (Except Clark 

Washington partial 

Virgin Islands 

Puerto Rico 

Pennsylvania - Allegheny County yes 

New Jersey yes 

Nevada - Washoe County yes 

and Washoe Counties, and Indian Country) yes 
Table II. Category 2-States with an approved PSD SIP that, when the Tailoring Rule issued, did not allow for 1/2/1

State Name 

What is the projected deadline for SIP submittal? 

What is the actual or expected date of submission of SIP revision incorporating TR thresholds to EPA for approval? 

What is the actual or expected date of final EPA action on SIP revision? 

What is the expected date of promulgation of FIP? Comments 

Alaska Dec. 1, 2011 

before Dec. 1, 2010 By Jan 2, 2011 N/A 

State expects to submit a SIP revision prior to EPA's issuanca final SIP call on Dec. 1, 2010that case, the state would not included in the SIP call and EPexpects to parallel process the revision, and to approve the Srevision by Jan. 2, 2011. If the State fails to submit before De2010, it will receive a Dec. 1, 2deadline for SIP submittal. 

Arizona - Pinal County Dec. 22, 2010 Dec. 23, 2010 

State intends to seek delegatiothe FIP. 

Arizona - Rest of State (excluding Maricopa County, Pima County, and Indian County) Dec. 22, 2010 Dec. 23, 2010 

State intends to seek delegatiothe FIP. 

Arkansas Dec. 22, 2010 Dec. 23, 2010 

State is considering seeking delegation of the FIP. 

California - Sacramento Metropolitan AQMD Jan. 31, 2011 Feb. 1, 2011 
State Name 

What is the projected deadline for SIP submittal? 

What is the actual or expected date of submission of SIP revision incorporating TR thresholds to EPA for approval? 

What is the actual or expected date of final EPA action on SIP revision? 

What is the expected date of promulgation of FIP? Comments 

Connecticut March 1, 2011 March 2, 2011 

EPA is parallel processing SIP submission. 

Florida Dec. 22, 2010 Dec. 23, 2010 Idaho Dec. 22, 2010 Dec. 23, 2010 

State intends to seek delegatiothe FIP. 

Kansas Dec. 22, 2010 Dec. 23, 2010 

State is submitting a SIP revisand EPA plans to parallel procState intends to seek delegatiothe FIP. 

Kentucky - Louisville Metro APCD (Jefferson County) Jan. 1, 2011 

EPA estimates by Dec. 1, 2010 

during Dec. 2010 N/A 

County expects to submit a SIrevision prior to EPA's issuanca final SIP call on Dec. 1, 2010which case it would not be included in the SIP call. EPA would then rule on the submisby Jan. 2, 2011. However, if tcounty fails to submit before D1, 2010, it would accept a Jan2011 deadline for SIP submitta

Kentucky - Rest of State March 31, 2011 Dec. 14, 2010 by Jan. 2, 2011 N/A 

EPA is parallel processing the revision. 

Nebraska March 1, 2011 Feb. 1, 2011 N/A 

State is submitting a SIP revisand EPA plans to parallel proc
State Name 

What is the projected deadline for SIP submittal? 

What is the actual or expected date of submission of SIP revision incorporating TR thresholds to EPA for approval? 

What is the actual or expected date of final EPA action on SIP revision? 

What is the expected date of promulgation of FIP? Comments 

Nevada - Clark County July 1, 2011 

before Dec. 1, 2010 by July 1, 2011 N/A 

County expects to submit a SIrevision prior to EPA's issuanca final SIP call on Dec. 1, 2010which case it would not be included in the SIP call. EPA would then rule on the submisby July 1, 2011. However, if thcounty fails to submit before D1, 2010, it would accept a July 2011 deadline for SIP submitta

Oregon Dec. 22, 2010 Dec. 23, 2010 

State intends to seek delegatiothe FIP. 

Texas Dec. 1, 2011 Dec. 2, 2011 

State did not address a SIP cadeadline, so will receive a dea1 year from date of promulgatithe SIP call. There is no indicathat Texas will pursue rulemakactivities until the pending litigais resolved. 

Wyoming Dec. 22, 2010 Dec. 23, 2010 

Note: The dates for state law actions included in these tables are reasonably expected based on statements by state officials to EP

communications and in meetings and teleconferences. In some cases, the state officials have cautioned that because the dates aradministrative and/or legislative processes, certain events could occur – such as negative comments received during rulemaking o

lead to delays in some of the state law actions. By the same token, some of the state law actions may take less time than estimate

each of the various state law actions is reasonably expected to occur on the indicated date. 
Table III: Category 3---States with an approved PSD SIP that, when the Tailoring Rule issued

allowed Jan. 2, 2011 regulation of GHGs, but at the lower statutory threshold. 

State 

Does state interpret SIP provisions to incorporate TR thresholds without requiring further action? 

For states that revised or will revise their state law to incorporate TR threshold, what date will those changes be effective? 

Does EPA currently intend to include state in rule rescinding approval of the part of the PSD program applying to small GHG sources by 1/2/11? Comments 

Alabama no Jan. 18, 2011 yes 

Final EPA action on SIP revision expected by Jan. 2011. 

t

California - Mendocino County no 

before or during Jan. 2011 yes 

Adoption is planned for no later than Jan. 2011, maybe sooner. 

tTt3

California - Monterey Bay yes no 

t

California - North Coast Unified no 

before or during Jan. 2011 yes 

Adoption is planned for no later than Jan. 2011, maybe sooner. 

tTt3

California - Northern Sonoma County No Dec. 14, 2010 yes Colorado no Nov. 20, 2010 yes 
State 

Does state interpret SIP provisions to incorporate TR thresholds without requiring further action? 

For states that revised or will revise their state law to incorporate TR threshold, what date will those changes be effective? 

Does EPA currently intend to include state in rule rescinding approval of the part of the PSD program applying to small GHG sources by 1/2/11? Comments 

Delaware yes no 

Interprets "subject to regulation" to incorporate GHG Tailoring Rule thresholds, but also plans to explicitly add the higher thresholds by amending its regulations. Anticipate finalizing regulatory changes by Jan. 2. 

Georgia no Dec. 29, 2010 yes 

Final EPA action on SIP revision expected by Jan. 2011. 

Indiana no 

Emergency rule effective Jan. 2, 2011. Permanent rule effective March or April 2011. yes 

Iowa no Dec. 22, 2010 yes Louisiana no by Jan. 2, 2011 yes Maine no Feb. 2, 2011 yes 

Final EPA action on SIP revision expected in May 2011. 

tw2

Maryland no before Jan. 2, 2011 yes 

Final EPA action on SIP revision expected by March 2011. 

Michigan yes no Mississippi no by Dec. 2, 2010 yes 

Final EPA action on SIP revision expected by Jan. 2011. 
State 

Does state interpret SIP provisions to incorporate TR thresholds without requiring further action? 

For states that revised or will revise their state law to incorporate TR threshold, what date will those changes be effective? 

Does EPA currently intend to include state in rule rescinding approval of the part of the PSD program applying to small GHG sources by 1/2/11? Comments 

Missouri no 

Emergency rule effective Jan, 3, 2011. Permanent rule effective July 30, 2011. yes 

t2e3

Montana yes no New Hampshire no Jan. 2, 2011 yes 

Final EPA action on SIP revision expected in April 2011. 

New Mexico - Albuquerque no by Jan. 8, 2011 yes 

tt

New Mexico - Rest of State no by Jan. 2, 2011 yes New York unknown* by Aug. 2011 no 

EPA expects to approve a PSD SIP for state in Oct. 2010. This approval will be narrowed to only approve permitting of GHG emissions at or above the TR threshold. NY is still determining whether it can interpret its state law to incorporate the TR thresholds, or whether state law revisions are required. 

tct

North Carolina no Jan. 2, 2011 yes 

Final EPA action on SIP revision expected by Jan. 2011. 

North Dakota yes no 

State also expects to adopt the TR thresholds by state rule revision by April 2011. 
State 

Does state interpret SIP provisions to incorporate TR thresholds without requiring further action? 

For states that revised or will revise their state law to incorporate TR threshold, what date will those changes be effective? 

Does EPA currently intend to include state in rule rescinding approval of the part of the PSD program applying to small GHG sources by 1/2/11? Comments 

Ohio no Jan. 2, 2011 yes Oklahoma no 

Emergency rule effective by January 2, 2011. Permanent rule effective no earlier than July 2011, latest is July 2012. yes 

toe

Pennsylvania - Philadelphia yes no Pennsylvania - Rest of State yes no Rhode Island no Jan. 15, 2011 yes 

Final EPA action on SIP revision expected in Feb. 2011. 

tw

South Carolina no June 11, 2010 yes 

State legislature passed an emergency resolution on June 11, 2010 to incorporate the TR thresholds that is already in effect. State plans to also pursue regulatory changes. 

South Dakota no by Jan. 10, 2011 yes 

twbJ
State 

Does state interpret SIP provisions to incorporate TR thresholds without requiring further action? 

For states that revised or will revise their state law to incorporate TR threshold, what date will those changes be effective? 

Does EPA currently intend to include state in rule rescinding approval of the part of the PSD program applying to small GHG sources by 1/2/11? Comments 

Tennessee no Feb. 15, 2011 yes 

Tennessee has a mandatory 90 day effective period that cannot be waived except for emergency situations. Changes were supposed to be adopted Oct. 13, 2010. Region will check with state on this. Final EPA action on SIP revision expected to be effective on Feb. 15, 2011. 

tw

Utah no Dec. 2010 yes Vermont no end of 2010 yes 

Final EPA action on SIP revision expected in April 2011. 

Virginia no before Jan. 2, 2011 yes West Virginia yes no 

Will provisionally apply Tailoring Rule interpretation of "subject to regulation", while also pursuing rulemaking. 

Wisconsin no 

Emergency rule effective by Jan. 2, 2011. Permanent rule effective in summer or fall 2011. yes 

Note: The dates for state law actions included in these tables are reasonably expected based on statements by state officials to EP

communications and in meetings and teleconferences. In some cases, the state officials have cautioned that because the dates aradministrative and/or legislative processes, certain events could occur – such as negative comments received during rulemaking o

lead to delays in some of the state law actions. By the same token, some of the state law actions may take less time than estimate

each of the various state law actions is reasonably expected to occur on the indicated date.