alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
- o

• •," T r o o Qc-1-: ! ,-;=,3jpf , ^JX^" ^ '^' ^ ".^^<—- , C O Annett e B . Weinstiank , Ph.D . 152 0 Sherwoo d Ave , Phon e 517.337.154 5 Eas t Lansin g M l 48823-188 5 FAX 517.337.166 5 annettew@nnsu.ed u www.readinqclinic.or g Docke t Managemen t Facilit y: i U.S
. Dept . o fTransportatio n Z" Docke t No . FAA-2012-008 9 S 120 0 Ne wJerse yAve . S E Wes t Buildin g Gran d Floo r Roo m W-12014 0 Washingto n D C 2059 0 Re : Su n Countr yslo t exemptio n Docke t No . FAA-2012-008 9 February10 , 201 2 Su n CountryAirline s i s runnin g a safe , profitabl e rout e whic h i s provin g t o b e a ke y playe ri n mid-Michigan' s effort s t o buil d an d sustai n it s economi crecoveryan d growth . Sinc e Su n CountryAirline s inaugurate d it s Minneapolis-Lansing-Washingto n D.C
. rout e les s tha n a yea rago , 48,00 0 passenger s hav e fille d thes e flights , makin g th e rout e a n economicall ysoun d enterprise . Th e eas e o fconnectio n fro m Michigan' s capital t o tie s i n Washingto n D.C
. i s invaluabl e fo rbusiness , university , governmen t an d associatio n leader s a s the ywor k t o rebuil d Michigan' s economy . Th e direc t rout e als o promote s tourism , anothe rbuildin g bloc k fo r economi crecovery . Byal l measures . Su n CountryAirline s i s providin g a profitabl e servic e tha t i s provin g vita l fo rth e economi cdevelopmen t o fmid-Michigan . Th e Departmen t o fTransportatio n ha s th e authorit yt o provid e additiona l slot s fo rSu n Countryunde ra n exemptio n rule . Pleas e recogniz e Su n Country' s importanc e t o thi s are a an d approv e th e additiona l slots . 

### Sincerely , /
<PAGE>


                                                                   Exhibit 23.10

To the Board of Directors and Shareholders of
SECURITY CAPITAL (EU) MANAGEMENT HOLDINGS S.A.

We have audited the annual accounts of Security Capital (EU) Management Holdings
S.A. as at 31 December 1999 and 2000, and the related profit and loss accounts
for each of the years in the two year period ended 31 December 2000, all
expressed in United States Dollars. These financial statements are the
responsibility of the Board of Directors. Our responsibility is to express an
opinion based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with International Standards on Auditing
and auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America. Those
Standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable
assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material
misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting
the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes
assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by the
Board of Directors, as well as evaluating the overall financial statements
presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our
opinion.

Accounting practices required by the Luxembourg legal and regulatory framework
vary in certain important respects from accounting principles generally accepted
in the United States of America. The application of the latter would have
affected the determination of the results of its operations expressed in United
States dollars for each of the years in the two year period ended December 31,
2000 and the determination of shareholders' equity and financial position also
expressed in United States dollars at December 31, 1999 and 2000 to the extent
summarized in Note 10 to the financial statements.

In our opinion, the attached annual accounts give, in conformity with Luxembourg
legal and regulatory requirements, a true and fair view of the financial
position of Security Capital (EU) Management Holdings S.A. as of 31 December
1999 and 2000 and of the results of its operations for each of the years in the
two-year period ended 31 December 2000.

PricewaterhouseCoopers S.a.r.l.                        Luxembourg, 14 March 2001
Reviseur d'entreprises
Represented by




Pascal Rakovsky
Amaury Eward
```

[Federal Register: March 5, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 43)]
[Proposed Rules]               
[Page 10198]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr05mr10-14]                         

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 52

[EPA-R07-OAR-2010-0011; FRL-9122-5]

 
Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plan; State of Iowa

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Proposed rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: EPA proposes to approve revisions to the Iowa State 
Implementation Plan (SIP) submitted by the State on April 28, 2009. The 
purpose of these revisions is to update existing air quality rules; 
make corrections, clarifications and improvements; and to add 
information with regard to the application of permit exemptions. EPA is 
proposing to approve the SIP revisions pursuant to section 110 of the 
Clean Air Act.

DATES: Comments on this proposed action must be received in writing by 
April 5, 2010.

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-R07-
OAR-2010-0011, by mail to Tracey Casburn, Environmental Protection 
Agency, Air Planning and Development Branch, 901 North 5th Street, 
Kansas City, Kansas 66101. Comments may also be submitted 
electronically or through hand delivery/courier by following the 
detailed instructions in the ADDRESSES section of the direct final rule 
located in the rules section of this Federal Register.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Tracey Casburn at (913) 551-7016, or 
by e-mail at casburn.tracey@epa.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In the final rules section of the Federal 
Register, EPA is approving the state's revision as a direct final rule 
without prior proposal because the Agency views this as a 
noncontroversial revision amendment and anticipates no relevant adverse 
comments to this action. A detailed rationale for the approval is set 
forth in the direct final rule. If no relevant adverse comments are 
received in response to this action, no further activity is 
contemplated in relation to this action. If EPA receives relevant 
adverse comments, the direct final rule will be withdrawn and all 
public comments received will be addressed in a subsequent final rule 
based on this proposed action. EPA will not institute a second comment 
period on this action. Any parties interested in commenting on this 
action should do so at this time. Please note that if EPA receives 
adverse comment on part of this rule and if that part can be severed 
from the remainder of the rule, EPA may adopt as final those parts of 
the rule that are not the subject of an adverse comment. For additional 
information, see the direct final rule which is located in the rules 
section of this Federal Register.

    Dated: February 23, 2010.
Karl Brooks,
Regional Administrator, Region 7.
[FR Doc. 2010-4554 Filed 3-4-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
```
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 158 (Wednesday, August 15, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Page 40524]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-17527]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration

[Docket No. FDA-2017-N-0809]


Issuance of Priority Review Voucher; Rare Pediatric Disease 
Product

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is announcing the 
issuance of a priority review voucher to the sponsor of a rare 
pediatric disease product application. The Federal Food, Drug, and 
Cosmetic Act (FD&C Act), as amended by the Food and Drug Administration 
Safety and Innovation Act (FDASIA), authorizes FDA to award priority 
review vouchers to sponsors of approved rare pediatric disease product 
applications that meet certain criteria. FDA is required to publish 
notice of the award of the priority review voucher. FDA has determined 
that CRYSVITA (burosamab-twza), manufactured by Ultragenyx 
Pharmaceutical, Inc., meets the criteria for a priority review voucher.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Althea Cuff, Center for Drug 
Evaluation and Research, Food and Drug Administration, 10903 New 
Hampshire Ave., Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002, 301-796-4061, Fax: 301-
796-9856, email: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#5d3c312935383c733e283b3b1d3b393c7335352e733a322b"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="f2939e869a9793dc91879494b2949693dc9a9a81dc959d84">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: FDA is announcing the issuance of a priority 
review voucher to the sponsor of an approved rare pediatric disease 
product application. Under section 529 of the FD&C Act (21 U.S.C. 
360ff), which was added by FDASIA, FDA will award priority review 
vouchers to sponsors of approved rare pediatric disease product 
applications that meet certain criteria. FDA has determined that 
CRYSVITA (burosamab-twza), manufactured by Ultragenyx Pharmaceutical, 
Inc., meets the criteria for a priority review voucher. CRYSVITA 
(burosamab-twza) is indicated for the treatment of X-linked 
hypophosphatemia in adult and pediatric patients 1 year of age and 
older.
    For further information about the Rare Pediatric Disease Priority 
Review Voucher Program and for a link to the full text of section 529 
of the FD&C Act, go to https://www.fda.gov/ForIndustry/DevelopingProductsforRareDiseasesConditions/RarePediatricDiseasePriorityVoucherProgram/default.htm. For further 
information about CRYSVITA (burosumab-twza), go to the ``Drugs@FDA'' 
website at https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cder/daf/.

    Dated: August 8, 2018.
Leslie Kux,
Associate Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2018-17527 Filed 8-14-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4164-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### STATE of Florida, Petitioner, v. Peter Leo PROULX, Respondent.

No. 67-335.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Second District.

Oct. 25, 1967.

Earl Faircloth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Robert R. Crittenden, Asst. Atty. Gen., Lakeland, for petitioner.

Joseph G. Donahey, Jr., of Mosley & Donahey, Clearwater, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

Upon review of the record and the factual situation involved in this case, the petition for writ of certiorari is hereby denied.

LILES, C. J., and ALLEN and SHANNON, JJ., concur.
#### LINDSLEY LUMBER COMPANY, Appellant, v. BRIARHILL PROPERTIES, INC., a Florida corporation, Continental Mortgage Investors et al., Appellees.

Nos. 70-429, 70-430.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Oct. 21, 1970.

Rehearing Denied Jan. 22, 1971.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
#### John L. COTTON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 70-324.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Oct. 11, 1971.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
# C_2015206EN.01001001.xml

| 23.6.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 206/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.6.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 206/10

---

Commission communication pursuant to Article 17(5) of Regulation (EC) No 1008/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council on common rules for the operation of air services in the Community

Invitation to tender in respect of the operation of scheduled air services in accordance with public service obligations

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2015/C 206/06)

| Member State | Finland |
| --- | --- |
| Route concerned | Helsinki – Savonlinna |
| Period of validity of the contract | 11 January 2016 - 22 December 2017 |
| Deadline for submission of tenders | 61 days after the day of publication of the present invitation |
| Address where the text of the invitation to tender and any relevant information and/or documentation related to public tender and the public service obligation can be obtained free of charge | Finnish Transport Agency,
  Address:





  Kirjaamo |
| PB 33 |
| FI-00521 Helsinki |
| SUOMI/FINLAND |
| Tel. +358 505942353 |
| Fax +358 295343700 |
| E-mail: kirjaamo@liikennevirasto.fi |
| Internet: www.liikennevirasto.fi/savonlinna-airservices |

Member State

Finland

Route concerned

Helsinki – Savonlinna

Period of validity of the contract

11 January 2016 - 22 December 2017

Deadline for submission of tenders

61 days after the day of publication of the present invitation

Address where the text of the invitation to tender and any relevant information and/or documentation related to public tender and the public service obligation can be obtained free of charge

Finnish Transport Agency,

Address:

Kirjaamo

PB 33

FI-00521 Helsinki

SUOMI/FINLAND

Tel. +358 505942353

Fax +358 295343700

E-mail: kirjaamo@liikennevirasto.fi

Internet: www.liikennevirasto.fi/savonlinna-airservices

---
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3444 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3444

To authorize the Secretary of Transportation to issue a certificate of 
   documentation with appropriate endorsement for employment in the 
      coastwise trade of the United States for the vessel KLIPPER.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            November 3, 1993

  Mr. Lazio introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
               Committee on Merchant Marine and Fisheries

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To authorize the Secretary of Transportation to issue a certificate of 
   documentation with appropriate endorsement for employment in the 
      coastwise trade of the United States for the vessel KLIPPER.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled, That notwithstanding 
section 27 of the Merchant Marine Act, 1920 (46 App. U.S.C. 883), the 
Act of June 19, 1886 (46 App. U.S.C. 289), and section 12106 of title 
46, United States Code, the Secretary of Transportation may issue a 
certificate of documentation with appropriate endorsement for 
employment in the coastwise trade of the United States for the vessel 
KLIPPER (New York State registration number NY8166AN).

                                 <all>
```
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 02-6941

PHILLIP ANTHONY DAYE, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus B. J. BARNES, Sheriff; WILLARDEAN DULA, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Durham. William L. Osteen, District Judge. (CA-01-94-1) Submitted: September 5, 2002 Decided: September 11, 2002 Before MOTZ, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Phillip Anthony Daye, Appellant Pro Se. Susan D. Moore, COUNTY ATTORNEY’S OFFICE, Greensboro, North Carolina; Perry Cleveland Henson, Sr., Amanda Mary Willis, HENSON & HENSON, L.L.P., Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Phillip Anthony Daye appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 2002) complaint under 28 U.S.C.A. § 1915A (West Supp. 2002). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion accepting the magistrate judge’s recommendation and find that this appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Daye v. Barnes , No. CA-01-94-1 (M.D.N.C. May 29, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
#### Frances W. TOMPKINS, Appellant, v. EMPIRE LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA, Appellee.

No. 72-745.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Oct. 2, 1972.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Orange County; Claude R. Edwards, Judge.

Appeal dismissed.
#### Bachman *v.*Reading Coach Company, Appellant.

Argued November 12, 1934.

*505Before Trexler, P. J., Keller, Cuhstiitgham:, Baldrige, Stadtfeld, Parker and James, JJ.

*Marh C. McQ'uitten,*and with him *Charles W. Matten*and *Harry R. Matten.*

*Charles H. Weidner,*and *Stevens <& Lee,*for appellee, were not heard.

December 18, 1934:

Per Curiam,

The facts in this case bring it within our decision in Myers v. Funk, 111 Pa. Superior Ct. 17, 169 A. 400. Defendant’s driver was unquestionably guilty of negligence. With the traffic light showing red against him he continued eastward on Spring Street, in the City of Reading, at high speed, across the intersection with Centre Avenue and ran into plaintiff’s truck, which was going slowly northward on Centre Avenue. Had the plaintiff seen defendant’s bus just before it entered the street intersection the case would have been governed by Byrne v. Schultz, 306 Pa. 427, 160 A. 125, and it would have been the duty of the trial court to have ruled that he was guilty of contributory negligence as matter of law. But there was evidence from which the jury could find that when plaintiff, about twenty feet from the pedestrian crossing, looked to his *506left and saw defendant’s bus it was approximately a block away; and, from which it conld reasonably infer, that on entering the actual street intersection plaintiff’s view to the left was partially obstructed by a sedan automobile going alongside of him, which was making a left hand turn into Spring Street, and interfered with his seeing the defendant’s bus continuing into the intersection at high speed against the traffic signal.

In these circumstances the questions of the defendant’s negligence and the plaintiff’s contributory negligence were for the jury.

The judgment is affirmed.
<PAGE>

                                                                   Exhibit 99.1

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

EQUALNET ANNOUNCES THAT IT WILL NOT BE ABLE TO FILE ITS ANNUAL REPORT WHEN
DUE FOR ITS FISCAL YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2000.

HOUSTON --- SEPTEMBER 20, 2000 --- Equalnet Communications Corp. (OTC: BB:
ENET) announced today that it will not be able to file its annual report on
Form 10-K for its fiscal year ended June 30, 2000, when due on September 28,
2000, with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Commission").  As
previously announced the Company's independent auditors resigned in June
2000, and since their resignation the Company has been unable to retain a
suitable replacement. In addition to lacking outside auditors, the Company
does not at this time have the financial or human resources necessary to
prepare and file its annual report with the Commission. To complete and file
the 10-K by its due date the Company would have to incur significant
additional costs to hire outside consultants to compile information
ordinarily compiled by employees of the Company. Moreover, the operating
budget of the Company, as approved by the bankruptcy court, does not provide
for funds to engage outside consultants to gather information, independent
accountants to prepare the audited financial statements or funds to print and
distribute the annual report to shareholders.

The Company has submitted a request for a "no action letter" from the
Commission requesting the Company be granted the right to modify its periodic
reporting requirements under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended
(the "Exchange Act").  The Company requested that it be permitted to file
with the Commission the monthly operating reports that will be submitted by
the Company to the bankruptcy court in lieu of filing the annual and
quarterly reports required by the Exchange Act.  Although, there is no
assurance that the Commission will permit the Company to modify its periodic
reporting requirements, the Company will not be able to file its Annual
Report on Form 10-K with the Commission by September 28, 2000.

This news release includes statements that may constitute forward-looking
statements made pursuant to the safe harbor provisions of the Private
Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995.  This information may involve risks
and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from
such forward-looking statements.  Facts that could cause or contribute to
such differences include, but are not limited to, factors detailed in the
Company's Form 10-K and other filings of the Company with the Commission.

Contact: Mitchell H. Bodian, Equalnet Communications Corp. 281.529.4602.
#### Tony GIAMO, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

No. 41012.

Supreme Court of Florida.

June 22, 1971.

Rehearing Denied Aug. 4, 1971.

Certiorari denied. 245 So.2d 116.

CARLTON, Acting C. J., and ADKINS, BOYD, McCAIN and DEKLE, JJ., concur.
# C_2015319EN.01000601.xml

| 26.9.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 319/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.9.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 319/6

---

Notice of the expiry of certain countervailing measures

(2015/C 319/09)

Further to the publication of a notice of impending expiry (1) following which no duly substantiated request for a review was lodged, the Commission gives notice that the countervailing measures mentioned below will shortly expire.

1

This notice is published in accordance with Article 18 of Council Regulation (EC) No 597/2009 of 11 June 2009 on protection against subsidised imports from countries not members of the European Community (2).

2

| Product | Country(ies) of origin or exportation | Measures | Reference | Date of expiry (3) |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Certain polyethylene terephthalate | Iran
  Pakistan
  United Arab Emirates | Countervailing duty | Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 857/2010 imposing a definitive countervailing duty on imports of certain polyethylene terephthalate originating in Iran, Pakistan and the United Arab Emirates (OJ L 254, 29.9.2010, p. 10). | 30.9.2015 |

Product

Country(ies) of origin or exportation

Measures

Reference

Date of expiry (3)

3

Certain polyethylene terephthalate

Iran

Pakistan

United Arab Emirates

Countervailing duty

Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 857/2010 imposing a definitive countervailing duty on imports of certain polyethylene terephthalate originating in Iran, Pakistan and the United Arab Emirates (OJ L 254, 29.9.2010, p. 10).

30.9.2015

---

(1)  OJ C 10, 14.1.2015, p. 3.

1

(2)  OJ L 188, 18.7.2009, p. 93.

2

(3)  The measure expires at midnight of the day mentioned in this column.

3

---
#### W. G. Halkett Co. *v.*City of Philadelphia.

Argued October 11, 1934.

Before Trexlbr, P. J., Keller, Cunningham, Baldrige, Stadteeld, Parker and James, JJ.

*211
      *Leo Belmont,*for appellant.

*212
      *Mayne R.*Longstreth, and with him *David J. Smyth*and *Robert Von Moschsisher,*for appellee.

November 22, 1934:

Pee Cukiam,

The judgment is affirmed on the opinion of Judge Steen.
#### Henry ARNOLD and John F. Robbert v. The BOARD OF LEVEE COMMISSIONERS OF the ORLEANS LEVEE DISTRICT, Guy Le Mieux, the F. Edward Hebert Foundation and Ernest A. Carrere, Jr.

No. 62453.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

June 30, 1978.

In re: The Board of Levee Commissioners of the Orleans Levee District applying for writs of certiorari, prohibition or mandamus to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit. Parish of Orleans. 359 So.2d 748.

Granted.

It is ordered that the writ of review issue; that the Court of Appeal send up the record in duplicate of the case; and that counsel for plaintiff and defendant be notified.