alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit
      32.1**





**Form
      of 906
      Certifications**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED**


**PURSUANT
      TO
      SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with
      the Annual Report of U.S. Xpress Enterprises, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K
      for the year ending December 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
      Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned hereby certifies,
      pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350 (as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002) that he is the Chief Executive Officer of the Company and that:
      (1)
      the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and (2) the information contained in the Report
      fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
      of operations of the Company.








/s/
      Max L.
      Fuller


Max
      L.
      Fuller


Co-Chairman
      of the
      Board of Directors,


Chief
      Executive
      Officer and Secretary








Date:
      March  ,
      2007
•'^A 1 / ; /O W


## ' ' JCKE T - . rI i UNITE D STATE S O F AMERIC A

DEPARTMEN TO F TRANSPORTATIO N FEDERA L AVIATIO N ADMINISTRATIO N § ADMINISTRATION , §

Complainant , § ^^ > vs . § FAADocke t No

. CP09SW000 4 § DM S No

. FAA-2009-073 5

. Roslyn e Mari e Elde r§ •^'° " ^^ ^ Respondent , §
COMPLAINANT' S NOTIC E O F APPEARANC E A S COUNSE L PLEAS E TAK E NOTIC E THA TYoland a Ayal a Bernal , Federa l Aviatio n Administratio n (FAA) , Southwest Region , 260 1 Meacha m Blvd. , For t Wortin , Texas , 7613 7 enter s ine r appearance a s counse l o n behal fofth e FAA

. Respectfull ysubmitted

. LYNETT E WOR D Regiona l Counse l Southwes t Regio n By : Yoland a Ayal ^

Berna l Attorne y (817)222-507 0 FAX (817 ) 222-594 5 Dated : Ma y26 , 201 0CERTIFICAT E O F SERVIC E
I hereb ycertifytha t o n thi s dat e th e origina l an d a cop yo fComplainant' s Notic e o fAppearanc e a s Counse l wer e sen t b yFedera l Expres s mail , to : Federa l Aviatio n Administratio n 60 0 Independenc e Avenue , S.W

. Wilbu rWrigh t Buildin g - Roo m 2W100 0 Washington , D C 2059 1 Att: : Hearin g Docke t Clerk , AGC-43 0 I hereb ycertifytha t a cop yo fthi s Complainant' s Notic e o fAppearanc e a s Counse l was sen t thi s dat e byFedera l Expres s Mai l to : Th e Honorabl e Isaa cD

. Benki n Administrativ e La wJudg e Offic e o fHearings , M-2 0 U.S

. Departmen t o fTransportatio n 120 0 Ne wJerse yAvenue , S.E

. Eas t Buildin g Groun d Floor , Roo m El2-32 0 Washington , D C 2059 0 Ms

. Roslyn e Mari e Elde r 83 5 Sierr a Vist a Drive , Ap t 32 6 LasN^gas , N V 8916 9

G

. GayWhittirigton-Hopkin s , Managemen t Progra m Analys t Federa l Aviatio n Administratio n For t Worth , Texa s 7613 7 Dated : Ma y26 , 201 0
#### Willie Clyde SMITH, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 72-733.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Sept. 19, 1972.

Willie Clyde Smith, in pro per.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., for appel-lee.

Before CHARLES CARROLL, HEN-DRY and HAVERFIELD, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

This court, proceeding in the manner outlined and recommended by the Supreme Court of the United States in Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 744, *87*S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493, having deferred ruling on a motion of the public defender to withdraw as counsel for the indigent defendant-appellant, and having furnished appellant with a copy of the public defender’s memorandum brief, and having allowed the appellant a reasonable specified time within which to raise any points that he chose in support of this appeal, and the appellant having filed his response thereto, on consideration thereof upon full examination of *397the proceedings we conclude that the appeal is wholly frivolous. Whereupon, the public defender’s said motion to withdraw is granted, and the order or judgment appealed is hereby affirmed.
An official website of the United States government                

----

end of header

Census.govNewsroomReleasesCensus 2000

# Newsroom Archive

Skip left menu navigation                          - About the Newsroom
                          - Facts for Features
                          - **News Releases**
                          - Press Kits
                          - Tip Sheets

### Release Information

**CB01-CN.97**
**Contact:**  Public Information Office							301-457-3691/301-457-3620 (fax)301-457-1037 (TDD)e-mail: 2000usa@census.govStatistical Information StaffPopulation Division301-457-2422e-mail: pop@census.gov

## FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:  EMBARGOED UNTIL: 12:01 A.M. EDT, MAY 23, 2001 (WEDNESDAY)

## Census Bureau Releases Census 2000 Demographic Profile for New Jersey

The U.S. Census Bureau today released the *Profile of General Demographic Characteristics: Census 2000* for New Jersey, a one-page table providing Census 2000 data on age and sex distribution, race, Hispanic origin, household relationship and type, housing occupancy and tenure (whether the housing occupant owns or rents).

 The profile includes nearly 100 data items in all, plus percentage distributions.

 In addition to the profile of the state as a whole, similar demographic profiles for counties, places and other geographic components of the state can be accessed on an embargoed basis at  <https://www.census.gov/dcmd/www/embargo/embargo_demoprofile.html>. After the release time, go to the Census Bureau's online search-and-retrieval database American FactFinder  <http://factfinder2.census.gov> or to its Demographic Profile Page  <https://www.census.gov/census2000/demoprofile.html>. You will also be able to download the profiles from the bureau's file transfer protocol site <http://www2.census.gov/census_2000/datasets/demographic_profile/>.

 For information about how to order paper copies of Census 2000 demographic profiles, contact Customer Services Center, U.S. Census Bureau, 301-457-4100; or e-mail:<webmaster@census.gov>. 

 For local context, contact the New Jersey State Data Center, 609-984-2595; e-mail: <djoye@dol.state.nj.us>.

CONNECT WITH US**********

                            - Information Quality
                            - Data Linkage Infrastructure
                            - Data Protection and Privacy Policy
                            - Accessibility
                            - FOIA
                            - Inspector General
                            - No FEAR Act
                            - U.S. Department of Commerce
                            - USA.gov

----

Measuring America's People, Places, and Economy

Is this page helpful?
YesNo

NO THANKS

255 characters maximum255 characters maximum reached

Thank you for your feedback.Comments or suggestions? 

PIO@census.gov
#### STATE of Florida, Appellant, v. Lawrence Thomas NIEMAN and Theodore Clevenger, Appellees.

No. 74-94.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Fourth District.

April 11, 1974.

Philip S. Shailer, State’s Atty., and Jon H. Gutmacher, Asst. State’s Atty., Fort Lauderdale, for appellant.

Joseph A. Varón of Varón, Stahl & Kay, Hollywood, for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The State appeals an order suppressing certain tangible evidence seized following a warrantless search of an automobile which had been driven by appellee-Nieman. We conclude that on the basis of the information then known to the officers conducting the search, coupled with the surrounding circumstances, the officers had probable cause to believe that the automobile contained contraband and thus the search was not illegal. Carroll v. United States, 1925, 267 U.S. 132, 45 S.Ct. 280, 69 L.Ed. 543; State v. Miller, Fla.App.1972, 267 So.2d 352; State v. Sanders, Fla.App. 1970, 239 So.2d 120.

The order granting the motion to suppress is reversed and this cause remanded for further proceedings.

OWEN, C. J., and WALDEN and DOWNEY, JJ., concur.
_________________________________________ 

 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

October 31, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

131400 & (67)(72) Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices 

v SC: 131400 

 COA: 258574 

Oakland CC: 04-196584-FH 

JAMES GARY RENAUD, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the motion for immediate consideration is GRANTED. 

The application for leave to appeal the April 18, 2006 judgment of the Court of Appeals 

is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions 

presented should be reviewed by this Court. The motion to remand is DENIED. 

p1023 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

October 31, 2006 

 Clerk
#### Shirley M. SPELLERBERG, Appellant, v. Tom ADAMS as Secretary of State for the State of Florida; Floyd Christian, Commissioner of Education for the State of Florida; and Martin Braterman as Supervisor of Elections of Dade County, Florida, Appellees.

No. 40513.

Supreme Court of Florida.

March 17, 1971.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Description of Capital Transaction                               Years ended

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

                                  December 28,   December 30,   December 31,   December 25,  December 26,
                                     1996           1995           1994           1993          1992
                                  ------------   ------------   ------------   ------------  ------------

<S>                               <C>            <C>            <C>            <C>           <C>

Shares issued and outstanding
  December 28, 1991               1,019,319      1,019,319      1,019,319      1,019,319     1,019,319

Acquisition of treasury stock        (2,926)        (2,926)        (2,926)        (2,926)       (2,194)
Acquisition of treasury stock        (2,541)        (2,541)        (2,541)        (1,578)          -
Acquisition of treasury stock        (5,334)        (5,334)        (2,622)           -             -
Acquisition of treasury stock        (5,991)          (750)           -              -             -
Acquisition of treasury stock        (2,215)           -              -              -             -
                                  ---------      ---------      ---------      ---------     ---------


Weighted average number of
  shares outstanding              1,000,312      1,007,768      1,011,230      1,014,815     1,017,125
                                  ---------      ---------      ---------      ---------     ---------
                                  ---------      ---------      ---------      ---------     ---------

</TABLE>


<PAGE>




Note:

The effects of the treasury stock transactions on the weighted average number of
shares outstanding are calculated as follows:

1992
----

2,926 shares times 273 days divided by 364 days equals 2,194.

1993
----

2,541 shares times 226 days divided by 364 days equals 1,578.

1994
----

2,934 shares times 280 days divided by 371 days equals 2,215.
2,400 shares times 63 days divided by 371 days equals 407.

1995
----

3,000 shares times 91 days divided by 364 days equals 750.
2,991 shares times 0 days divided by 364 days equals 0.

1996
----

1,900 shares times 301 days divided by 364 days equals 1,571.
2,575 shares times 91 days divided by 364 days equals 644.
#### Stanley Richmire IRVIN, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

No. 41172.

Supreme Court of Florida.

June 29, 1971.

Rehearing Denied Aug. 4, 1971.

Certiorari denied. 246 So.2d 592.

ERVIN, Acting C. J., and CARLTON, ADKINS, BOYD and McCAIN, JJ., concur.
EXHIBIT 32

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                     RULE 15d-14(b) and 18 U.S.C. Sec.1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of ProCoreGroup, Inc.(the  "Company") on
Form 10-KSB for the period ended December 31. 2003  as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Dr. Bashiruddin
Usama, Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec.1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)     The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d)  of  the  Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934;  and

     (2)     The  information  contained  in  the Report fairly presents, in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.


February 27, 2004


/s/  Dr. Bashiruddin Usama
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dr. Bashiruddin Usama
Principal Executive Officer
Principal Financial Officer



<PAGE>
#### STATE of Louisiana ex rel. Alex BRANCH v. C. Murray HENDERSON, Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary.

No. 54128.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Dec. 19, 1973.

In re: Alex Branch applying for writs of certiorari and habeas corpus.

Writ denied. The showing made does not warrant the exercise of this Court’s supervisory jurisdiction. The reasons assigned by the trial judge are correct.

BARHAM, J., does not concur.
EXHIBIT 32.2





CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER





PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)





In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2020 (the “Report”) of New Mountain Finance Corporation (the “Registrant”), as filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Shiraz Y. Kajee, the Chief Financial Officer of the Registrant, hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge, that:





(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and


(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.





/s/ SHIRAZ Y. KAJEEName:Shiraz Y. KajeeDate:November 4, 2020
Order entered October 28, 2014

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-14-00759-CV

DALLAS INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT AND MICHAEL L. WILLIAMS, 

COMMISSIONER OF EDUCATION, Appellants/Cross-Appellees

V.

ADRIAN PETERS, Appellee/Cross-Appellant

On Appeal from the 101st Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DC-13-01850-I

ORDER

We GRANT the October 27, 2014 extension motions of appellants/cross-appellees and 

ORDER them to file their briefs no later than December 19, 2014. No further extensions will be 

granted absent exigent circumstances.

/s/ ADA BROWN 

JUSTICE
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
(Form S-8 No. 33-55547, 33-55657, 333-42019 and 333-77505) of Coram Healthcare
Corporation of our report dated April 2, 2001 with respect to the consolidated
financial statements and schedule of Coram Healthcare Corporation included in
this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2000.

We also consent to the incorporation by reference in Amendment No. 3 to the
Registration Statements (Form S-3 No. 33-59661 and 33-60959) and Amendment No. 1
to the Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-12955) and related prospectuses
of Coram Healthcare Corporation for the registration of 3,526,325, 2,686,656 and
184,444 shares, respectively, of its common stock, of our report dated April 2,
2001, with respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedule of
Coram Healthcare Corporation included in the above-referenced Form 10-K.


                                        /s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP
                                        ----------------------------
                                        ERNST & YOUNG LLP


Denver, Colorado
April 16, 2001
FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION 

COMPLIANCE WITH E.O. 12866 

Section 6(a)(3)(E) of E.O. 12866 requires agencies to identify for the public, in 

a complete, clear, and simple manner, those changes in a regulatory action made 

at the suggestion or recommendation of the Office of Information and 

Regulatory Affairs (OIRA), Office of Management and Budget. 

Title of Rulemaking: Photo Requirements for Pilot Certificates 

Regulatory Identification Number: 2120-JA42 

_________ _ OIRA did not review the rulemaking document. 

__________ OIRA reviewed the rulemaking document, but did not 

suggest or recommend any changes. 

____X______ OIRA reviewed the rulemaking document, and we have 

documented the changes we made at OIRA’s suggestion or 

recommendation in an attachment to this sheet. 

Karen Thornton November 19, 2010 

Office of Rulemaking Analyst Date 

Attachment 
2

Several changes were made to the Notice of Proposed Rulemaking in response to questions 

from the Office of Management and Budget (OMB). The majority of these were wording 

clarifications and insertions of additional information for the benefit of the reader. 

Other changes were as follows: 

 In the section of the preamble entitled “Fees for Issuing or Replacing a Pilot 

Certificate with Photo,” OMB asked the FAA to add—“The Federal Aviation 

Administration Reauthorization bill (H.R. 915), if enacted as passed by the House of 

Representatives on May 21, 2009, would provide authority to increase fees for 

airman certificates. This legislation would allow the FAA to recover the costs related 

to airman certification, and the legislation sets the fee for issuing an airman 

certificate at $50 and for issuing a replacement airman certificate at $25. Once the 

outcome of the reauthorization legislation is known, the FAA would decide whether 

additional rulemaking is necessary.” 

 In the preamble, OMB asked the FAA to create a consolidated section of questions 

for the public to consider titled “Comments Invited”, instead of including the 

questions in the sections of the preamble related to their issues.
<PAGE>

906 CERTIFICATIONS

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Veritas DGC Inc. (the
"Company") for the year ended July 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Form 10-K"), I, David B. Robson,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.       The Form 10-K fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;

2.       The information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.

October 14, 2003

/s/ DAVID B. ROBSON
-------------------
David B. Robson
Chief Executive Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Veritas DGC Inc. and will be retained by Veritas DGC Inc. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

                                       55
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND> This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from
the Form 10-K for year ended December 31, 1999 and is qualified in its entirety
by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                         DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                            JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                              DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                         30,567
<SECURITIES>                                   59,971
<RECEIVABLES>                                       0
<ALLOWANCES>                                        0
<INVENTORY>                                         0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                    0
<PP&E>                                      1,146,208
<DEPRECIATION>                                 72,734
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              3,957,151
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               0
<BONDS>                                     1,356,767
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                   257,642
<COMMON>                                          539
<OTHER-SE>                                  1,922,606
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                3,957,151
<SALES>                                             0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                              409,945
<CGS>                                               0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                 410,626
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            133,454
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             (134,135)
<INCOME-TAX>                                 (14,849)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 0
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                              (16,032)
<CHANGES>                                      16,136
<NET-INCOME>                                (116,996)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (0.98)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (0.98)


</TABLE>