alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 164 (Thursday, August 23, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Page 42710]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-18220]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION


Proposal Review Panel for Materials Research; Notice of Meeting

    In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92- 
463, as amended), the National Science Foundation (NSF) announces the 
following meeting:
    Name and Committee Code: Proposal Review Panel for Materials 
Research (DMR) (#1203)--Science and Technology Center on Real-Time 
Functional Imaging (STROBE) (Site Visit)
    Date and Time:

September 24, 2018; 8:00 a.m.-8:00 p.m.
September 25, 2018; 8:00 a.m.-4:00 p.m.

    Place: University of Colorado--Boulder, Sustainability, Energy and 
Environment Complex, CU Boulder East Campus, Boulder, Colorado 80303.
    Type of Meeting: Part Open.
    Contact Person: Dr. Charles Ying, Program Director, Division of 
Materials Research, National Science Foundation, 2415 Eisenhower 
Avenue, Alexandria, VA 22314, Telephone (703) 292-8428.
    Purpose of Meeting: Site visit to provide advice and 
recommendations concerning further support of the Science and 
Technology Center (STC).

Agenda

Monday, September 24, 2018

8:00 a.m.-11:00 a.m. Open--Review of STROBE STC
11:00 a.m.-8:00 p.m. Closed--Executive Session

Tuesday, September 25, 2018

8:00 a.m.-4:00 p.m. Closed--Executive Session

    Reason for Closing: The work being reviewed during closed portions 
of the site review includes information of a proprietary or 
confidential nature, including technical information; and information 
on personnel. These matters are exempt under 5 U.S.C. 552b(c), (4) and 
(6) of the Government in the Sunshine Act.

    Dated: August 20, 2018.
Crystal Robinson,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 2018-18220 Filed 8-22-18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-P
Exhibit 32.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with this Quarterly Report of Prosalutis Holdings Inc., on Form 10-Q for the Quarter ending June 30, 2016 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Mauricio Gonzales, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify to the best of my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:    (1) Such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the six months ending June 30, 2016, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and June 30, 2016 fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of Prosalutis Holdings Inc..     March 10, 2017By:/s/Mauricio GonzalesMauricio GonzalesChief Executive Officer
Exhibit 32.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with this Quarterly Report of Greenflag Ventures Inc., on Form 10-Q for the Quarter ending September 30, 2015 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Kris Kottmeier, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify to the best of my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:    (1) Such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the six months ending September 30 2015, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and September 30, 2015 fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of WTTJ Corp.     March 21, 2016By:/s/ Kris KottmeierKris KottmeierPresident and Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 21



LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES



|Company Name                                | Place/Date of Incorporation | Issued Capital                        | Principal Activities                                                                     
|------------------------------------------- | --------------------------- | ------------------------------------- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Noble Vici Private Limited                  | Republic of Singapore       | 1,000,001 shares at S$0.20 per share  | Holding Company                                                                          
|Noble Infotech Applications Private Limited | Republic of Singapore       | 1 share at S$1.00 per share           | Management/Development of software for interactive digital media and software consultancy
|The Digital Agency Private Limited          | Republic of Singapore       | 100 shares at S$1.00                  | Digital marketing consultancy                                                            
|Noble Digital Apps Sendirian Berhad         | Federation of Malaysia      | 1,000 shares at RM1,000               | Development of software for interactive digital media and software consultancy           
|VenVici Private Limited                     | Republic of Singapore       | 100,000 shares at S$1.00 per share    | Business and management consultancy services on e-commerce service                       
|VenVici Limited                             | Republic of Seychelles      | 50,000 shares at US$1.00 per share    | Business and management consultancy services on e-commerce service                       
|Ventrepreneur (SG) Private Limited          | Republic of Singapore       | 10,000 shares at S$1 per share        | Online retailing                                                                         
|UB45 Private Limited                        | Republic of Singapore       | 10,000 shares at S$1 per share        | Building Management                                                                      
|ToroV System Private Limited                | Republic of Singapore       | 10,000 shares at S$1 per share        | IoT Retailing                                                                            
|VMore Holding Limited                       | New Zealand                 | 1,000,000 shares at NZ$0.01 per share | New Zealand holding company                                                              
|VMore Merchants Pte Ltd                     | Republic of Singapore       | 1,000 shares at S$1 per share         | Merchants onboarding                                                                     
|AIM System Pte Ltd                          | Republic of Singapore       | 1,000 shares at S$1 per share         | Affiliate System Provider
# C_2013379EN.01000202.xml

| 28.12.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 379/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.12.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 379/2

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.7077 — Rheinmetall/Ferrostaal Industrieanlagen/Rheinmetall International Engineering JV)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2013/C 379/04)

On 16 December 2013, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in German and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32013M7077. EUR-Lex is the online access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32013M7077. EUR-Lex is the online access to the European law.

---
#### Emogene E. Forrester, *et*al., Defendant in Error, *vs.*B. C Scoville, *et al.,*Plaintiff in Error

1. *Equity*— Suit *to divest title*— Character *of proof required.*— In an action in the nature of a suit in chancery, to divest defendant of his title to certain lands, the evidence in order to warrant a decree in favor of plaintiff must be so clear ,definite, and positive, as to leave no reasonable ground for hesitancy in the mind of the Chancellor.

*Error to Lafayette Common Pleas Court.*

*Wallace and Mitchell,*for Plaintiff in Error.

*Geeene and Rathbone, and John H. Beatty,*for Defendant in Error.

Sherwood, Judge,

delivered the opinion of the court.

This action is in the nature of a suit in chancery, brought by plaintiff to divest defendant of title to Lot é, Block él, in the first addition to the City of Lexington, and vest the same in said Emogene E. Forrester, by whom the plaintiffs claim the money was furnished with which said lot was bought.

Upon issues submitted' to a jury, embracing the facts as to the ownership of the money, a verdict was had in favor of plaintiffs, and thereupon the Court entered a decree as prayed in the petition.

I have examined with care the testimony in the cause and am satified from such examination, that the evidence greatly preponderates in favor of the defendant, and fully supports the denial contained in his answer, that the plaintiff, Emogene E. Forrester, was the owner of the purchase money expended for the lot in question.

*269But even had the testimony preponderated on the side of the plaintiffs, it would not have been sufficient to have warranted a decree in their favor, unless of a character so clear, definite and positive, as to leave no room or reasonable ground for hesitancy in the mind of the Chancellor, as to the ownership of the money. (Johnson *et al.,*vs. Quarles *et al.*46 Mo., 423, and cases cited.)

The Decree of the Court below'is reversed, and the petition dismissed.

Judge Vories not sitting. The other Judges concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          APR-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                     169,878,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               13,035,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                 (720,000)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           197,849,000
<PP&E>                                      60,809,000
<DEPRECIATION>                               9,386,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             331,498,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       56,693,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        66,000
<OTHER-SE>                                 270,678,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               331,498,000
<SALES>                                     13,764,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            13,764,000
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               57,831,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             2,873,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             364,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           (43,974,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     7,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       (43,981,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                              (43,981,000)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.67)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.67)


</TABLE>
# C_2013275EN.01000601.xml

| 24.9.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 275/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.9.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 275/6

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

23 September 2013

2013/C 275/02

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,3508 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 133,59 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4576 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,84115 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 8,6007 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,2323 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 7,9710 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 25,925 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 299,05 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,7025 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,2265 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,4683 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,6880 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,4313 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,3909 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 10,4732 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,6120 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,6907 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 452,87 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 13,2870 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 8,2650 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,6175 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 15 081,11 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,3145 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 58,443 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 43,0200 |
| THB | Thai baht | 42,248 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 2,9840 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 17,3382 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 84,6340 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,3508

JPY

Japanese yen

133,59

DKK

Danish krone

7,4576

GBP

Pound sterling

0,84115

SEK

Swedish krona

8,6007

CHF

Swiss franc

1,2323

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

7,9710

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

25,925

HUF

Hungarian forint

299,05

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,7025

PLN

Polish zloty

4,2265

RON

Romanian leu

4,4683

TRY

Turkish lira

2,6880

AUD

Australian dollar

1,4313

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,3909

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

10,4732

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,6120

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,6907

KRW

South Korean won

1 452,87

ZAR

South African rand

13,2870

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

8,2650

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,6175

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

15 081,11

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,3145

PHP

Philippine peso

58,443

RUB

Russian rouble

43,0200

THB

Thai baht

42,248

BRL

Brazilian real

2,9840

MXN

Mexican peso

17,3382

INR

Indian rupee

84,6340

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
<PAGE>

                                                                     EXHIBIT 5.1

            [Letterhead of Troop Steuber Pasich Reddick & Tobey, LLP]



September 14, 2000

Aames Financial Corporation
350 South Grand Avenue, 52nd Floor
Los Angeles, California 90071

Ladies/Gentlemen:

At your request, we have examined the Registration Statement on Form S-8 to
which this letter is attached as exhibit 5.1 (the "Registration Statement"),
filed by Aames Financial Corporation, a Delaware corporation (the "Company"),
with respect to the registration under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended
(the "Act") of 9,077,599 shares of the Company's Common Stock, par value $0.001
per share (the "Shares") issuable pursuant to the Company's 1999 Stock Option
Plan (the "Plan").

We are of the opinion, as of the date hereof, that the Shares have been duly
authorized and, upon issuance and sale in conformity with and pursuant to the
Plan, will be validly issued, fully paid and non-assessable.

We consent to the use of this opinion as an exhibit to the Registration
Statement and to use of our name in the Prospectus constituting a part thereof.

                             Respectfully submitted,

                             /s/ TROOP STEUBER PASICH REDDICK & TOBEY, LLP

                             Troop Steuber Pasich Reddick & Tobey, LLP
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned certifies
that to the best of his knowledge (1) this Quarterly Report of Corporate Capital Trust, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2017, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(this Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and (2) the information contained in this Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition of the Company as of June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 and its results of operations for the period ended June 30, 2017.



|                      |  |                                                                                       
|--------------------- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: August 11, 2017 |  | /s/ Thomas K. Sittema                                                                 
|                      |  | Thomas K. Sittema Chief Executive
Officer (Principal Executive Officer)               
|                      | 
|Date: August 11, 2017 |  | /s/ Chirag J. Bhavsar                                                                 
|                      |  | Chirag J. Bhavsar Chief Financial
Officer (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
July 28, 2015



### JUDGMENT 

## The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

MAYOR ANNISE PARKER AND CITY OF HOUSTON , Appellant s

NO. 14

- 14

- 00899

- CV V. NO. 14

- 14

- 00932

- CV

JACK PIDGEON AND LAR RY HICKS , A ppellee s

________________________________ This cause, an appeal from the order in favor of appellee s , Jack Pidgeon and Larry Hicks, signed November 5, 2014, was heard on the transcript of the record. We have inspected the record and find error in the judg ment. We therefore REVERSE and REMAND the order of the court below for proceedin gs in accordance with this court’ s opinion. We further order that all costs incurred by reason of this appeal be paid by appellee s , Jack Pidgeon and Larry Hicks. We further or der this decision certified below for observance.
#### Willie C. PAGE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 73-346.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

July 18, 1973.

Appeal dismissed.
#### Alec CULBERSON v. Mrs. Lillian SULLIVAN.

No. 44473.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

May 22, 1967.

Ray, Lee, Moore & Swarthout, Jackson, for appellant.

David Williams, Brandon, Crisler, Cris-ler & Bowling, Jackson, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
Appendix D - Future aircraft acquisitions.

The Applicant foresees the possibility of acquiring one or more other small UAS in the near future. The listed sUAS have equal or greater safety capability to the aircraft cited in the application, such as geo - fence, battery monitoring, telemetry, and automatic health monitoring. Operation of the below listed sUAS would not alter any of the provisions or restrictions cited in this petition. Therefore, applicant requests that the following aircraft are also approved under this petition, following notification to the FAA of acquisition, registration, and any other documentation required by FAA including copies of operating and/or maintenance manuals. 1. DJI Inspire T600 http://www.dji.com/product/inspire

- 1/spec 2. DJI Phantom 3 http://www.dji.com/product/phantom

- 3/spec 3. 3DRobotics Solo http://3drobotics.com/2015/05/solo

- gopro - drone

- specs/ 4. 3D R obotics X8 http://3drobotics.com/wp

- content/uploads/2014/11/X8+

- Operation

Manual

- vA.pdf
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-7580

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

KAREN SUE JAMES,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western

District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Glen E. Conrad, District Judge.

(5:05-cr-00001; 7:06-cv-00258-gec)

Submitted: March 29, 2007 Decided: April 4, 2007

Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Karen Sue James, Appellant Pro Se. Donald Ray Wolthuis, OFFICE OF

THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Karen Sue James seeks to appeal the district court’s

order denying relief on her 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000) motion. The

order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a

certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A

certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial

showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C.

§ 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by

demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that any

assessment of the constitutional claims by the district court is

debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by

the district court is likewise debatable. Miller-El v. Cockrell,

537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484

(2000); Rose v. Lee, 252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001). We have

independently reviewed the record and conclude that James has not

made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of

appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Exhibit 32.1

Certification Pursuant To 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 By The Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer,

As Adopted Pursuant To Section 906 Of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act Of 2002.

I, F. Clay
Creasey, Jr., certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:



| | 1. | The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Toys R Us Property Company II, LLC (the Company) for the quarterly period ended April 30, 2011 (the
Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) and 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (15 U.S.C. 78m); and
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                                                                                        
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: June 14, 2011                                                                                                     
|                                                                                                                        
|/s/    F. Clay Creasey, Jr.                                                                                             
|F. Clay Creasey, Jr. President and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer)