alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3061 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3061

 To provide that a Federal employee shall be ineligible for an annual 
  pay adjustment before completing at least 1 year of service, and to 
 revise the criteria governing appointments in the competitive service.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 14, 1993

  Mr. Duncan introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
               Committee on Post Office and Civil Service

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To provide that a Federal employee shall be ineligible for an annual 
  pay adjustment before completing at least 1 year of service, and to 
 revise the criteria governing appointments in the competitive service.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ELIGIBILITY FOR ANNUAL PAY ADJUSTMENTS.

    Section 5303 of title 5, United States Code, is amended by adding 
at the end the following:
    ``(h)(1) An employee shall be ineligible for a pay adjustment under 
this section unless such employee has completed at least 1 year of 
continuous Government service, determined as of the beginning of the 
last applicable pay period before the date on which such adjustment 
would take effect.
    ``(2) For the purpose of paragraph (1), continuity of service shall 
be considered broken if there occurs any break in service of 3 days or 
longer.''.

SEC. 2. FILLING VACANT POSITIONS IN THE COMPETITIVE SERVICE.

    (a) In General.--Notwithstanding any provision of title 5, United 
States Code, or any other provision of law, in filling a position in 
the competitive service, an appointing officer shall exercise such 
officer's discretion solely on the basis of merit and fitness and 
without regard to an applicant's civil service status or years of 
Government service or any other similar factor.
    (b) Regulations.--The Office of Personnel Management may prescribe 
any regulations necessary to carry out this section.

                                 <all>
```
#### Simon E. RUBIN, Sam A. Goldstein et al., duly qualified and acting as the Personnel Board of the City of Miami Beach, Florida, Appellants, v. Julius SHAPIRO, Appellee.

No. 67-32.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Third District.

Nov. 21, 1967.

Joseph A. Wanick, City Atty., for appellants.

Irving Cypen, Miami Beach, Sam Daniels, Miami, for appellee.

Before CHARLES CARROLL, C. J., and HENDRY and SWANN, JJ.

PER CURIAM. '

Reversed on the authority of Rubin v. Sanford, Fla.App.1967, 198 So.2d 856, cert. denied.
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pane l unani m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l ar g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T AN OO P S OG Y, P et i t i on er , v. E R I C H . H O L D E R , J r ., A tto rn e yG e n e r a l, R e s p o n d e n t. N o. 10- 70847 A ge nc yN o. A 098- 372- 409 ME MOR AN DU M *

O n P e t i t i on f

orR e vi e w of

an O r de rof

the B o ar do f I m m ig r a tio n A p p e a ls S ubm i tt e d Jul y12, 2011 ** B efo re: S C H R O E D E R , A L A R C Ó N , an dL E A V Y , C i rcu i tJu d g es. A noop S ogy , ana t i ve of the P hi l i ppi ne s and ac i t i z e n of I ndi a , pe t i t i ons f

or r e v ie w o f

th e B o ar do f

I m m ig r a tio n A p p e a ls ’ ( “B I A ” ) o r d e rd e n y in g h is m o tio n to r e ope n. W e ha ve j ur i s di c t i on unde r8 U . S . C . § 1252. W e r e vi e w f orabus e of 

# FI LED JU L 25 2011 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS10- 70847 2 d is c r e tio n th e d e n ia l o f

am o tio n to r e o p e n , I

tu rr i b a rr i a v . I

NS , 321 F . 3d 889, 894 ( 9 th C i r . 2 0 0 3 ) , an dwe d e n yth e p e t i t i o n f o rr e v i e w. T he B IA di d n otabuse i t s di sc re t i on i n d enyi ng S og y’ s m ot i on t o reopen w he r e S ogy ’ s c l a i m s c oul d ha ve be e n r a i s e d i n hi s pr i orpr oc e e di ngs be f or e the a g e n c y . Se e Mo n dra g o n v . I NS , 6 2 5 F .2 d2 7 0 , 2 7 2 ( 9 th C ir . 1 9 8 0 ) ; see a l so Si ngh v . I NS , 29 5 F . 3d 10 37 , 10 39 (9th C i r. 20 02 ) ( B IA ’ s deni alof a m ot i on t o reopen s h a ll b e r e v e r s e do n lyif it is “a rb itr ary , irr atio n a l, o rc o n tr aryto law ” ) . P E T I T I ON F OR RE V I E W DE NI E D.
## NUMBER 13

- 21

- 00 2 1 7

- C V

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI

– EDINBURG

IN RE KINGMAN HOLDINGS, LLC

, AS TRUSTEE

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus

.



## ORDER

Before Chief Justice Contreras and Justices Benavides and Silva

Order Per Curiam

On J uly 1 6 , 2021, relator Ki ngman Holdings, LLC as Trustee for Keeton Avenue

1412 #11 Land Trust filed a petition for writ of mandamus in the above

- referenced cause.

Through this original proceeding, relator seeks to compel the trial court to gr ant relator’s

motion for summary judgment against Debani Sarahi Galvan and Armando Flores

pursuant to Texas Rule of Civil Procedure 166a(i). See T EX

. R. C IV

. P . 166a(i) (“ After

adequate time for discovery, a party without presenting summary judgment evidence may

move for summary judgment on the ground that there is no evidence of one or more2 essential elements of a claim or defense on which an adverse party would have the

burden of proof at trial.” )

.

The Court requests that the real part ies in interest, Galvan and Fl ores, or any

others whose interest would be directly affected by the relief sought, including but not

limited to Las Jollas Condom inium Association, Inc.

, Esponjas Develo p ment, LTD

, and

Eduardo Cantu

, file a response to the petition for writ of mandamus on or before the

expiration of ten days from the date of this order. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P

. 52.2, 52.4, 52.8.

PER CURIAM

Delivered and filed on the

19th d ay of July , 202 1

.
#### Jules FELEDY, Petitioner, v. John E. PAGE et al., Respondents. Leonard R. FISHER, Petitioner, v. John E. PAGE et al., Respondents.

Nos. 42593, 42578.

Supreme Court of Florida.

April 10, 1973.

Cross petition for certiorari denied.

CARLTON, C. J., and ADKINS, BOYD, McCAIN and DEKLE, JJ., concur.
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14 I, Alexandre Frigon, the President, CEO of Xumanii, Inc.. (the “Registrant”), certify that; (1)I have reviewed this quarterlyl Report on Form 10-Q of the Registrant;(2)Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;(3)Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;(4)I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) for the Registrant and have:a)Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under my supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the Registrant is made known to me by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;b)Evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report my conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; andc)Disclosed in this report any change in the Registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the Registrant's most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and(5)I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of the internal control over financial reporting, to the Registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of Registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):a)All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; andb)Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.  June 4, 2013/s/Alexandre FrigonBy:Alexandre FrigonPresident, CEOand Chief Financial Officer
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

August 29, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh
Elizabeth A. Weaver 130903 Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, SHAWN DEMEAN HARRIS, Justices Plaintiff-Appellant,

v SC: 130903 COA: 264220 Wayne CC: 05-518486-AH DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Defendant-Appellee.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application fo r leave to appeal the March 30, 2006 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.

d0821 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

August 29, 2006

Clerk
#### Charles L. BERRY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 7139.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Second District.

Oct. 27, 1967.

Henry Gonzalez, Tampa, for appellant.

Earl Faircloth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and William D. Roth, Asst. Atty. Gen., Lakeland, for appellee.

HENSLEY, ROBERT E., Associate Judge.

Appellant, defendant below, appeals from a judgment of guilt on a charge of attempted grand larceny pursuant to trial without a jury.

*337The only assignment of error argued was that the trial court erred in denying appellant’s motion to set aside a waiver of a jury trial.

The record shows that trial was delayed several times by either defendant, a co-defendant or by their counsel, for various reasons. When one of the delays took: place on March 3, 1966, the court continued the trial to April 12, 1966, and informed their attorney that no more delays would be allowed. On April 12, 1966, the court was informed by a fellow attorney that appellant’s attorney was out of town on another case, had been unavoidably delayed, could not appear, that appellant had no other counsel, and requested a continuance for not less than a day or two until appellant’s attorney could be present and would be ready for trial. This motion was denied by the court unless the appellant would waive a jury trial. Appellant then waived a trial by jury and the cause was set for trial before the court, for April 25, 1966. On April 22, 1966, the attorney for appellant filed a motion to set aside the waiver and for a jury trial. This was argued on the day of trial, and denied.

We understand the irritation of the trial court over its inability to get the case to trial. The case, in addition to other delays, came on for trial, with a jury present, on two occasions prior to the final time. It had to be continued one time because the defendant was ill. On the other occasion it had to be continued at the fault of his attorney (who was not appellant’s counsel on appeal). The final time was, again solely the fault of appellant’s prior attorney. There is nothing to indicate, however, that the illness of the Defendant was feigned, nor does it appear that any of the continuances were occasioned by any design of the Defendant to delay the trial. We hold that the court was in error in refusing to set aside the waiver and allowing a trial by jury. The discretion the court has in granting or denying such motions should be exercised liberally in favor of granting to an accused the right of trial by jury. (Floyd v. State, Fla., 90 So.2d 105) We further hold that the waiver was not voluntarily given when the Defendant was faced with either going to trial without counsel, or, agreeing to waive trial by jury.

We reverse for a new trial, by jury.

SHANNON, Acting C. J., and PIERCE, J., concur.
# C_2015024EN.01000901.xml

| 23.1.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 24/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.1.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 24/9

---

Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union

Cases where the Commission raises no objections

(Text with EEA relevance, except for products falling under Annex I of the Treaty)

(2015/C 024/02)

| Date of adoption of the decision | 11.11.2014 |
| --- | --- |
| Aid number | SA.37726 (2013/N) |
| Member State | Germany |
| Region | — | — |
| Title (and/or name of the beneficiary) | Bund: Modell- und Demonstrationsvorhaben im Bereich Tierschutz im weiteren Sinne |
| Legal basis | a) | Richtlinie über die Förderung von Modellvorhaben ‘Demonstrationsbetriebe im Bereich Tierschutz’ |

Date of adoption of the decision

11.11.2014

Aid number

SA.37726 (2013/N)

Member State

Germany

Region

—

—

Title (and/or name of the beneficiary)

Bund: Modell- und Demonstrationsvorhaben im Bereich Tierschutz im weiteren Sinne

Legal basis

a)

Richtlinie über die Förderung von Modellvorhaben ‘Demonstrationsbetriebe im Bereich Tierschutz’

| b) | § § 23 und 44 Bundeshaushaltsordnung (BHO) |
| --- | --- |

b)

§ § 23 und 44 Bundeshaushaltsordnung (BHO)

| c) | § § 48, 49, 49a Verwaltungsverfahrensgesetz (VwVfG) |
| --- | --- |

c)

§ § 48, 49, 49a Verwaltungsverfahrensgesetz (VwVfG)

| d) | Richtlinie für Zuwendungsanträge auf Ausgabenbasis — AZA |
| --- | --- |

d)

Richtlinie für Zuwendungsanträge auf Ausgabenbasis — AZA

Type of measure

Scheme

—

Objective

Investments in agricultural holdings, Technical support (AGRI)

Form of aid

Direct grant

Budget

Overall budget: EUR 12 (in millions)

Annual budget: EUR 4 (in millions)

Intensity

100 %

Duration (period)

until 31.12.2018

Economic sectors

Animal production, Raising of dairy cattle, Raising of other cattle and buffaloes, Raising of sheep and goats, Raising of swine/pigs, Raising of poultry, Raising of other animals

Name and address of the granting authority

| Bundesanstalt für Landwirtschaft und Ernährung |
| --- |
| Deichmanns Aue 29, 53179 Bonn |

Bundesanstalt für Landwirtschaft und Ernährung

Deichmanns Aue 29, 53179 Bonn

Other information

—

The authentic text(s) of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found at:

http://ec.europa.eu/competition/elojade/isef/index.cfm

---
#### Ellen Rochelle BOSEM, Petitioner-Cross-Respondent, v. Arie Lionel BOSEM, Respondent-Cross-Petitioner.

No. 43230.

Supreme Court of Florida.

April 11, 1973.

Cross petition for certiorari denied.

CARLTON, C. J., and ADKINS, Mc-CAIN and DEKLE, JJ., concur.

BOYD, J., dissents.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Science Foundation

The National Science Board's Committee on Strategy (CS), pursuant to NSF regulations (45 CFR part 614), the National Science Foundation Act, as amended (42 U.S.C. 1862n-5), and the Government in the Sunshine Act (5 U.S.C. 552b), hereby gives notice of the scheduling of a teleconference for the transaction of National Science Board business, as follows:

# TIME AND DATE:

Tuesday, August 28, 2018, from 5:00-6:00 p.m. EDT.

# PLACE:

                        This meeting will be held by teleconference at the National Science Foundation, 2415 Eisenhower Avenue, Alexandria, VA 22314. An audio link will be available for the public. Members of the public must contact the Board Office to request the public audio link by sending an email to                         *nationalsciencebrd@nsf.gov*                         at least 24 hours prior to the teleconference.                    

# STATUS:

Open.

# MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:

Chair's opening remarks; consideration of a potential vision statement for NSF.

# CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION:

                        Point of contact for this meeting is: Kathy Jacquart, 703-292-7000,                         *kjaquar@nsf.gov,*                         2415 Eisenhower Avenue, Alexandria, VA 22314. Meeting information and updates may be found at                         *http://www.nsf.gov/​nsb/​notices/​.jsp#sunshine.*                         Please refer to the National Science Board website at                         *www.nsf.gov/​nsb*                         for general information.                    

Ann Bushmiller,

Senior Counsel to the National Science Board.

[FR Doc. 2018-18441 Filed 8-22-18; 11:15 am]

BILLING CODE 7555-01-P
EXHIBIT 32.2

Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

as Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In
connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of CFC International, Inc. and subsidiaries (the Company) for the quarter ended March 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, Dennis W. Lakomy, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                   |  |                                                     
|------------------ |  | ----------------------------------------------------
|Date: May 15, 2006 |  | /s/ Dennis W. Lakomy                                
|                   |  | Dennis W. Lakomy                                    
|                   |  | Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not,
except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of § 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided by CFC International, Inc., and will be retained by CFC International, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.



25
<PAGE>

                       Securities and Exchange Commission
                             Washington, D.C. 20549

                               ------------------

                                    FORM 8-K

                             CURRENT REPORT PURSUANT
                          TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
                         SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

                Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported)
                                 AUGUST 15, 2000

                              COURIER CORPORATION
               --------------------------------------------------
               (Exact name of registrant as specified in charter)

                                 MASSACHUSETTS
                 ----------------------------------------------
                 (State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation)

         0-7597                                          04-2502514
------------------------                    ------------------------------------
(Commission file number)                    (IRS employer identification number)

15 WELLMAN AVENUE, NORTH CHELMSFORD, MA                     01863
----------------------------------------                 ----------
(Address of principal executive offices)                 (Zip code)

                                 (978) 251-6000
              ----------------------------------------------------
              (Registrant's telephone number, including area code)


<PAGE>




         ITEM 5.  OTHER EVENTS

         On August 15, 2000, Courier Corporation (the "Company") issued a press
release announcing that it has signed a definitive agreement to acquire Dover
Publications, Inc., a privately held New York publisher of special-interest
books, for $39 million in cash. The Company currently expects to complete the
acquisition by September 30, 2000.

         ITEM 7.  FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, PRO FORMA FINANCIAL INFORMATION AND
                  EXHIBITS

         Exhibit 99.1 - Press Release of Courier Corporation, dated
                        August 15, 2000.





<PAGE>


                                    SIGNATURE

         Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned hereunto duly authorized.

Date: August 28, 2000                 By: /S/  Robert P. Story, Jr.
                                          --------------------------------------
                                          Name:  Robert P. Story, Jr.
                                          Title: Senior Vice President and Chief
                                                 Financial Officer


<PAGE>


                                  EXHIBIT INDEX

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
EXHIBIT NO.                                 DESCRIPTION
-----------                                 -----------
<S>                <C>
   99.1             Press Release of Courier Corporation, dated August 15, 2000.
</TABLE>