alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Richard BUTLER.

No. 60306.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Oct. 28, 1977.

In re: Richard Butler applying for remedial writs.

Writ denied. The matter is moot.
Exhibit 32.2

















CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. Section 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In connection with the Amended Quarterly Report of Excelsis Investments, Inc. (formerly, Pub Crawl Holdings, Inc.) (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q/A-1 for the period ended September 30, 2013, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date here of (the “report”), I, Michelle Pannoni, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated this 31st day of January, 2014.








MICHELLE PANNONIMichelle PannoniChief Financial Officer
#### Byron Charles MAIDEL, Appellant, v. Linda MAIDEL, Appellee.

No. 72-1005.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

March 12, 1973.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed.
#### STATE of Louisiana ex rel. Bennie JERRY v. Ross MAGGIO, Jr., Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary.

No. 60428.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Oct. 28, 1977.

In re: Bennie Jerry applying for supervisory and remedial writs.

Writ refused. No merit in application.
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 3442

To eliminate certain expenditures provided by the Omnibus Budget

Reconciliation Act of 1993.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

NOVEMBER 3, 1993

Mr. SCHIFF introduced the following bill; which was referred jointly to the

Committees on Ways and Means, House Administration, and Agriculture

A BILL

To eliminate certain expenditures provided by the Omnibus

Budget Reconciliation Act of 1993.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. REPEAL OF INCREASE IN EARNED INCOME TAX

4 CREDIT AND IN PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION

5 CAMPAIGN FUND CHECKOFF.

6 (a) REPEAL OF INCREASE IN EARNED INCOME TAX

7 CREDIT.—Section 13131 of the Revenue Reconciliation

8 Act of 1993 is hereby repealed and the Internal Revenue

9 Code of 1986 shall be applied and administered as if such
2

•HR 3442 IH

1 section (and the amendments made by such section) had

2 not been enacted.

3 (b) REPEAL OF INCREASE IN PRESIDENTIAL ELEC4 TION CAMPAIGN FUND CHECKOFF.—Section 13441 of the

5 Revenue Reconciliation Act of 1993 is hereby repealed and

6 the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 shall be applied and

7 administered as if such section (and the amendments

8 made by such section) had not been enacted.

9 SEC. 2. REPEAL OF MORATORIUM ON COLLECTION OF CER10 TAIN ALLOWANCES IN AMENDMENTS MADE

11 BY THE OMNIBUS BUDGET RECONCILIATION

12 ACT OF 1993.

13 Section 13716 of the Omnibus Budget Reconciliation

14 Act of 1993 (42 U.S.C. 627 note) is hereby repealed.

15 SEC. 3. REVERSAL OF CERTAIN 1993 RECONCILIATION ACT

16 AMENDMENTS RELATING TO THE FOOD

17 STAMP PROGRAM.

18 (a) AMENDMENTS TO THE FOOD STAMP ACT OF

19 1977.—The Food Stamp Act of 1977 (7 U.S.C. 2011 et

20 seq.) is amended—

21 (1) in section 5(g)(2) by striking ‘‘a level’’ and

22 all that follows through ‘‘$50’’, and inserting

23 ‘‘$4,500’’,

24 (2) in section 17 by striking subsection (k), and

25 (3) in section 19(a)(1)(A)—
3

•HR 3442 IH

1 (A) by striking ‘‘$1,097,000,000’’ and in2 serting ‘‘$1,091,000,000’’, and

3 (B) by striking ‘‘$1,143,000,000’’ and in4 serting ‘‘$1,133,000,000’’.

5 (b) REPEALERS.—Chapter 3 of title XIII of the Om6 nibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1993 (Public Law 103-

7 66; 107 Stat. 672) is amended—

8 (1) by striking sections 13911, 13912, 13913,

9 13914, 13915, 13916, 13921, 13922, 13924, 13931,

10 and 13932, and

11 (2) in section 13971(b)—

12 (A) by striking paragraphs (3), (5), and

13 (6), and

14 (B) in paragraph (4) by striking ‘‘Sec15 tions’’ and all that follows through ‘‘13931,

16 and’’, and inserting ‘‘Section’’.

17 (c) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—Section 13901(b)

18 of the Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1993 (Public

19 Law 103-66; 107 Stat. 672) is amended in the table of

20 contents by striking the items relating to sections 13911,

21 13912, 13913, 13914, 13915, 13916, 13921, 13922,

22 13924, 13931, and 13932.

Æ
#### Janice KAUFMAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Donald KAUFMAN, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 9141.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, First Circuit.

Dec. 26, 1972.

Rehearing Denied Jan. 31, 1973.

*630John F. Seago, George, Bennett, Lindsay, Bass& Seago, Ltd., Baton Rouge, for defendant-appellant.

John Bride, Baton Rouge (substituting for Fanned Seidel, Baton Rouge), for plaintiff-appellee.

Before SARTAIN, BLANCHE and EVERETT, JJ.

EVERETT, Judge.

On April 5, 1972, Donald Kaufman was granted a divorce from Janice Kaufman by judgment of The Family Court in and for the Parish of East Baton Rouge. The only issue now is the custody of the minor children which was granted to the wife. The children are Donald Kaufman, Jr., born November 8, 1964, Monica Kaufman, born November S, 1965, and Joseph Kaufman, born September 7, 1967. The testimony is clear that Mrs. Kaufman removed these children from the domicile of the home in New Orleans and moved them to' Los An-geles, California.

At the same time, she admitted that she lived freely and in open adultery with a person by the name of Charles Morgan in the presence of these children from October, 1970 until January of 1971. Then they returned to Baton Rouge, Louisiana, where they moved into the home of Mr. Morgan’s mother, along with the children, and remained there until long after January of 1971. The District Court has seen fit to allow these children to remain in the custody of their mother.

We reverse this decision. The children ought to be returned to the father.

The facts reveal that Mrs. Kaufman has lived in open adultery and open concubinage with Charles Morgan for several months in the vicinity of these children. In addition to this, she had these children transported to California to be in the custody of her mother while she continued to live in concubinage with Mr. Morgan in Louisiana. The children were finally returned to Louisiana but once again exposed to the same harmful atmosphere.

Here is a situation where the husband obtained a divorce upon the ground of adultery of the wife. There is no evidence that there is any indication that he is not a capable parent.

Therefore, the decision of the Family Court is reversed and the custody of the children, Donald Kaufman, Jr., Monica Kaufman and Joseph Kaufman, is granted unto the father, Donald Kaufman. Morris v. Morris, La.App., 152 So.2d 291 (1963).

All costs to be paid by the plaintiff-ap-pellee.

Reversed.
### ~~121 J ElECTRfC POWER**~~-** RESEARCH INSTITUTE
July 31, 2007 RonaldJordan U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Ariel Rios Building 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., N.W. Mail Code 4303T Washington, DC 20460
Dear 

### Mr. Jordan, As you requested, pleasefind attached two copies each of the following reports summarizing EPRI's research efforts in characterizing powerplant flue 

### gas desulfurization (FGD) wastewater constituents. The reports attached are as follows:
• Flue Gas Desulfurization (FGD) Wastewater CharaCterization: Screening Study (1010162)
• EPRI TechnicalManual: Guidancefor Assessing Wastewater Impacts ofFGD Scrubbers (1013313) • The Fate ofMercury Absorbed in 

### Flue Gas Desulfurization (FGD) Systems (1009955) • Update to 1009955: Update onEnhanced Mercury Captureby WetFGD: Technical Update. EPRI and the U.S. Deparbnent ofEnergy National Energy Technology Laboratory. (1012673). EPA did not specifically include this reportinits request; however this Update is useful in providing the latest results. These reports are beingprovided to EPA to inform the Agency in its Effluent Guidelines Study of the Steam Electric industry. EPRI requests that these reports be used for purposes ofthis study only, and that the EPA not make the reports available to any thirdparty or the public. Not only do the reports have information that

### EPRI subjects to license, these reports have economic value to EPRI. Ifthe EPA allows access to the reportsby others, this may affect EPRI's ability to provide the EPA other reports atno cost in the 

### future. Please also find attached a reportproviding EPRI's perspectives on these wastewater characterization studies. Because of the R&D nature ofmuch of this work as well as additional reasons discussed inthe report, the FGD studies are likely notrepresentative of FGD across the industry as a whole. Because of

### this, EPRI believes it is critical that we provide ourperspectives on the background and objectives ofthese studies, 

### as well as the potentiallimitations of the results from these studies. We haveprovided ourperspectives on

### these data, butbelieve that the results are of limited benefit especially when EPA and EPRI are plarm.ing more wastewater specific studies of wet FGD systems. EPA had requested the Proceedings to the EPRI Workshop on ImpactofFGDs on Wastewater. EPRI neverpublished the proceedings of this 

### workshop. TI1e intent of

### this workshop was to update utilities on the potential wastewater issues, encourage informal discussion ofindividual company issues, and to provide EPRI R&D direction. If

### you have any questions, please contact me at 650 855 2812 or pchu@epri.com.

Paul Om Senior Project Manager Environment Sector EPRI
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION

I, Sanjay K. Jha, Chief Executive Officer, Motorola Mobility Holdings, Inc., certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002 (Section 906), that, to my knowledge:



| | (1) | the quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the period ended April 2, 2011 (the Quarterly Report), which this statement accompanies fully complies with
the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m); and
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | the information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Motorola Mobility
Holdings, Inc.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

This certificate is being furnished solely for purposes of Section 906.

Date: April 29, 2011



/s/ SANJAY K. JHADr. Sanjay K. Jha
Chief Executive Officer Motorola Mobility
Holdings, Inc.
# C_2012187EN.01000102.xml

| 27.6.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 187/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.6.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 187/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.6517 — The Klesch Group/Arkema's Vinyl Products Business)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2012/C 187/02

On 20 June 2012, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32012M6517. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32012M6517. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.

---
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Louis MIX.

No. 59262.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Sept. 19, 1977.

Orleans Indigent Defender Program, Maurice T. Hattier, New Orleans, for defendant-appellant.

William J. Guste, Jr., Atty. Gen., Barbara Rutledge, Asst. Atty. Gen., Harry F. Con-nick, Dist. Atty., Louise S. Korns, Asst. Dist. Atty., for plaintiff-appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Construing the sentences as concurrent, the convictions and sentences are affirmed.
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Ellen McDaniel FLOOD.

No. 54246.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Dec. 18, 1973.

In re: Ellen McDaniel Flood applying for writ of mandamus.

Granted. The Clerk and Court Reporter are ordered to file the transcript on or before January 20, 1974.
Exhibit 32 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Quarterly Report of Bullion Monarch Mining, Inc. (the Registrant) on Form 10-Q for the period ending October 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), we, R. Don Morris, President and Philip Manning, Chief Financial Officer of the Registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.  Date:December 14, 2010By:/s/R. Don MorrisR. Don MorrisPresident and DirectorDate:December 14, 2010By:/s/Philip ManningPhilip ManningChief Financial Officer  The foregoing certifications are being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, and are not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and are not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.   1
# C_2013014EN.01000201.xml

| 17.1.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 14/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.1.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 14/2

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.6662 — Andritz IV/Schuler)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2013/C 14/02

On 15 October 2012, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in German and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32012M6662. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32012M6662. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.

---
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-18-00188-CV

Mark Schomburg

v.

Bankers Insurance, LLC

§

§

§

§

From the 271st District Court

of Wise County (CV17-07-554)

July 19, 2018

Per Curiam

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that 

the appeal should be dismissed. It is ordered that the appeal is dismissed for 

want of jurisdiction.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS 

PER CURIAM
#### TRI CITY TRANSFER CO., INC., a Florida corporation, Appellant, v. ALL STEEL CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION, Florida corporation, Appellee.

No. 73-399.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

July 2, 1973.

Cause transferred to Circuit Court, Broward County.
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 326 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 326

 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to make the exclusion for 
      amounts received under group legal services plans permanent.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 5, 1993

  Mr. Rangel (for himself, Mr. Shays, and Mr. Schumer) introduced the 
 following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to make the exclusion for 
      amounts received under group legal services plans permanent.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PERMANENT EXTENSION OF EXCLUSION FOR EMPLOYER-PROVIDED GROUP 
              LEGAL SERVICES PLANS.

    (a) General Rule.--Section 120 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 
is amended by striking subsection (e) (relating to termination) and by 
redesignating subsection (f) as subsection (e).
    (b) Conforming Amendment.--Subsection (a) of section 104 of the Tax 
Extension Act of 1991 is amended by striking paragraph (2).
    (c) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply to taxable years beginning after December 31, 1991.

                                 <all>
```
```
**Exhibit 32.1
                            Section 906 Certification
                        of David R. Schroder (President)**
```

----

```
**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**
     In  connection  with the Annual  Report of MACC Private  Equities Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the year ended September 30, 2006, as filed with the
United  States  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof  (the
"Report"),  I,  David R.  Schroder,  President  and  Secretary  of the  Company,
certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

          (1) The Report fully complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a)
     or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

          (2) The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all
     material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
     Company.

                                                 /s/ David R. Schroder
                                              --------------------------
                                              David R. Schroder,
                                              President and Secretary

Date: December 28, 2006
```
# C_2015201EN.01000101.xml

| 18.6.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 201/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.6.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 201/1

---

RECOMMENDATION OF THE EUROPEAN CENTRAL BANK

of 10 June 2015

to the Council of the European Union on the external auditors of Banka Slovenije

(ECB/2015/23)

(2015/C 201/01)

THE GOVERNING COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN CENTRAL BANK,

Having regard to the Statute of the European System of Central Banks and of the European Central Bank, and in particular Article 27.1 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | The accounts of the European Central Bank (ECB) and national central banks of the Member States whose currency is the euro are audited by independent external auditors recommended by the ECB’s Governing Council and approved by the Council of the European Union. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

The accounts of the European Central Bank (ECB) and national central banks of the Member States whose currency is the euro are audited by independent external auditors recommended by the ECB’s Governing Council and approved by the Council of the European Union.

| (2) | The mandate of Banka Slovenije’s current external auditors, Deloitte Revizija d.o.o., ended following the audit for the financial year 2014. It is therefore necessary to appoint external auditors from the financial year 2015. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

The mandate of Banka Slovenije’s current external auditors, Deloitte Revizija d.o.o., ended following the audit for the financial year 2014. It is therefore necessary to appoint external auditors from the financial year 2015.

| (3) | Banka Slovenije has selected Ernst & Young d.o.o. as its external auditors for the financial years 2015 to 2017, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

Banka Slovenije has selected Ernst & Young d.o.o. as its external auditors for the financial years 2015 to 2017,

HAS ADOPTED THIS RECOMMENDATION:

It is recommended that Ernst & Young d.o.o. should be appointed as the external auditors of Banka Slovenije for the financial years 2015 to 2017.

Done at Frankfurt am Main, 10 June 2015.

The President of the ECB

Mario DRAGHI

---