alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 67 (Thursday, April 8, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 17910]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-7991]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary

[Docket ID: DOD-2010-OS-0040]

Privacy Act of 1974; Systems of Records

AGENCY: Defense Logistics Agency, DoD.

ACTION: Notice to delete a system of records.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Defense Logistics Agency proposes to delete a system of 
records notice in its existing inventory of records systems subject to 
the Privacy Act of 1974, (5 U.S.C. 552a), as amended.

DATES: This proposed action will be effective without further notice on 
May 10, 2010 unless comments are received which result in a contrary 
determination.

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments, identified by docket number and 
title, by any of the following methods:
    * Federal Rulemaking Portal: http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the 
instructions for submitting comments.
    * Mail: Federal Docket Management System Office, 1160 Defense 
Pentagon, Washington, DC 20301-1160.
    Instructions: All submissions received must include the agency 
name, docket number, and title for this Federal Register document. The 
general policy for comments and other submissions from members of the 
public is of make these submissions available for public viewing on the 
Internet at http://www.regulations.gov as they are received without 
change, including any personal identifiers or contact information.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jody Sinkler at (703) 767-5045.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Defense Logistics Agency systems of 
records notices subject to the Privacy Act of 1974, (5 U.S.C. 552a), as 
amended, have been published in the Federal Register and are available 
from the Chief Privacy and FOIA Officer, Headquarters Defense Logistics 
Agency, ATTN: DGA, 8725 John J. Kingman Road, Suite 1644, Fort Belvoir, 
VA 22060-6221.
    The Defense Logistics Agency proposes to delete one system of 
records notice from its inventory of record systems subject to the 
Privacy Act of 1974 (5 U.S.C. 552a), as amended. The proposed deletion 
is not within the purview of subsection (r) of the Privacy Act of 1974, 
(5 U.S.C. 552a), as amended, which requires the submission of a new or 
altered system report.

    Dated: April 5, 2010.
Mitchell S. Bryman,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.

Deletion:
S700.20

System name:
    Passport, Visa, and Country Clearance Files (July 23, 2003; 68 FR 
43504).

Reason:
    System notice is no longer necessary. Records are covered under 
existing DoD-wide notices; F011 AF A3 B DoD, DoD Foreign Clearance 
Program Records (April 6, 2007; 72 FR 17136) and A0055 USEUCOM DoD, 
Europe Command Travel Clearance Records (February 13, 2006; 71 FR 
7549).

[FR Doc. 2010-7991 Filed 4-7-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-06-P
```
#### William E. WADE and Harry J. Kangieser, Petitioners, v. MONROE COUNTY, a political sub-division of the State of Florida, Respondents.

No. 43309.

Supreme Court of Florida.

March 19, 1973.

Certiorari denied. 269 So.2d 70S.

CARLTON, C. J., and ADKINS, BOYD, McCAIN and DEKLE, TJ., concur.
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NO. WR-93,351-01

EX PARTE ARMANDO MARTINEZ, Applicant

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

CAUSE NO. 20160D04459-409-1 IN THE 409TH DISTRICT COURT

FROM EL PASO COUNTY

Per curiam.

O R D E R

Applicant was convicted of attempt to commit murder and sentenced to life imprisonment. 

The Eighth Court of Appeals affirmed his conviction. Martinez v. State, No. 08-19-00046-CR (Tex.

App. — El Paso, Feb. 10, 2021). Applicant filed this application for a writ of habeas corpus in the

county of conviction, and the district clerk forwarded it to this Court. See TEX.CODE CRIM. PROC.

art. 11.07.

Applicant contends that appellate counsel failed to timely inform Applicant that his

conviction had been affirmed and advise him of his right to file a pro se petition for discretionary

review. Applicant has alleged facts that, if true, might entitle him to relief. Ex parte Wilson, 956

S.W.2d 25 (Tex. Crim. App. 1997); Ex parte Crow, 180 S.W.3d 135 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005). 
2

Accordingly, the record should be developed. The trial court is the appropriate forum for findings

of fact. TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. art. 11.07, § 3(d). The trial court shall order appellate counsel to

respond to Applicant’s claim. In developing the record, the trial court may use any means set out

in Article 11.07, § 3(d). If the trial court elects to hold a hearing, it shall determine whether

Applicant is indigent. If Applicant is indigent and wants to be represented by counsel, the trial court

shall appoint counsel to represent him at the hearing. See TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. art. 26.04. If

counsel is appointed or retained, the trial court shall immediately notify this Court of counsel’s

name.

The trial court shall make findings of fact and conclusions of law as to whether appellate

counsel timely informed Applicant that his conviction had been affirmed and that he had a right to

file a pro se petition for discretionary review. The trial court shall also determine whether Applicant

would have timely filed a petition for discretionary review but for appellate counsel’s alleged

deficient performance. The trial court may make any other findings and conclusions that it deems

appropriate in response to Applicant’s claim.

The trial court shall make findings of fact and conclusions of law within ninety days from

the date of this order. The district clerk shall then immediately forward to this Court the trial court’s

findings and conclusions and the record developed on remand, including, among other things,

affidavits, motions, objections, proposed findings and conclusions, orders, and transcripts from

hearings and depositions. See TEX.R.APP.P. 73.4(b)(4). Any extensions of time must be requested

by the trial court and obtained from this Court.

Filed: January 12, 2022

Do not publish
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 162 (Tuesday, August 21, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Page 42328]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-18069]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meetings

TIME AND DATE:  2:00 p.m. on Thursday, August 23, 2018.

PLACE: Closed Commission Hearing Room 10800.

STATUS:  This meeting will be closed to the public.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:  Commissioners, Counsel to the Commissioners, 
the Secretary to the Commission, and recording secretaries will attend 
the closed meeting. Certain staff members who have an interest in the 
matters also may be present.
    The General Counsel of the Commission, or his designee, has 
certified that, in his opinion, one or more of the exemptions set forth 
in 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(3), (5), (6), (7), (8), 9(B) and (10) and 17 CFR 
200.402(a)(3), (a)(5), (a)(6), (a)(7), (a)(8), (a)(9)(ii) and (a)(10), 
permit consideration of the scheduled matters at the closed meeting.
    Commissioner Peirce, as duty officer, voted to consider the items 
listed for the closed meeting in closed session.
    The subject matters of the closed meeting will be:
    Institution and settlement of injunctive actions;
    Institution and settlement of administrative proceedings; and
    Other matters relating to enforcement proceedings.
    At times, changes in Commission priorities require alterations in 
the scheduling of meeting items.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION:  For further information and to 
ascertain what, if any, matters have been added, deleted or postponed; 
please contact Brent J. Fields from the Office of the Secretary at 
(202) 551-5400.

    Dated: August 16, 2018.
Jill M. Peterson,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2018-18069 Filed 8-17-18; 11:15 am]
 BILLING CODE 8011-01-P
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

BRIAN MCDANIEL,

Appellant

v.

PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF

TRANSPORTATION OF COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Appellee :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 21 EAP 2020

Appeal from the order of Commonwealth Court dated June 3,

2020 at 44 MD 2015

O RDER

PER CURIAM DECIDED: April 29, 2021

AND NOW, this 29 th day of April , 2021

, the order of the Commonwealth Court is

hereby AFFIRMED

.
# C_2015148EN.01000101.xml

| 5.5.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 148/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.5.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 148/1

---

Summary of European Union decisions on marketing authorisations in respect of medicinal products from 1 to 28 February 2015

(Published pursuant to Article 13 or 38 of Regulation (EC) No 726/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council (1))

1

(2015/C 148/01)

—   Issuing of a marketing authorisation (Article 38 of Regulation (EC) No 726/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council): Accepted

Issuing of a marketing authorisation

Accepted

| Date of the decision | Name of the medicinal product | INN (International Non-Proprietary Name) | Holder of the marketing authorisation | Number of the entry in the Community Register | Pharmaceutical form | ATC code (Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical Code) | Date of notification |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 10.2.2015 | Suvaxyn CSF Marker | Live Recombinant E2 gene deleted Bovine Viral Diarrhoea Virus containing Classical Swine Fever E2 (CP7_E2alf) | Zoetis Belgium S.A.
  Rue Laid Burniat 1, 1348 Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgique | EU/2/14/179 | Lyophilisate and solvent for suspension for injection | QI09AD04 | 12.2.2015 |

Date of the decision

Name of the medicinal product

INN (International Non-Proprietary Name)

Holder of the marketing authorisation

Number of the entry in the Community Register

Pharmaceutical form

ATC code (Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical Code)

Date of notification

10.2.2015

Suvaxyn CSF Marker

Live Recombinant E2 gene deleted Bovine Viral Diarrhoea Virus containing Classical Swine Fever E2 (CP7_E2alf)

Zoetis Belgium S.A.

Rue Laid Burniat 1, 1348 Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgique

EU/2/14/179

Lyophilisate and solvent for suspension for injection

QI09AD04

12.2.2015

Anyone wishing to consult the public assessment report on the medicinal products in question and the decisions relating thereto is invited to contact:

| The European Medicines Agency |
| --- |
| 30, Churchill Place, Canary Wharf |
| UK - LONDON E14 5EU |

The European Medicines Agency

30, Churchill Place, Canary Wharf

UK - LONDON E14 5EU

---

(1)  OJ L 136, 30.4.2004, p. 1.

1

---
#### Victor VALLECORSA, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 771.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Fourth District.

March 2, 1967.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
#### STATE of Louisiana v. James MEREDITH.

No. 59642.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Sept. 19, 1977.

Alan James Boudreaux, Staff Appeals Counsel, 24th Judicial District Indigent Defender Bd., New Orleans, for defendant-appellant.

William J. Guste, Jr., Atty. Gen., Barbara Rutledge, Asst. Atty. Gen., John M. Mam-oulides, Dist. Atty., Abbott J. Reeves, Director, Research and Appeals Division, Asst. Dist. Atty., for plaintiff-appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002











The undersigned, Timothy J. Neher, the Chief Executive Officer, Chairman of the Board of Directors and Treasurer of ACCELERATED ACQUISITIONS XII, INC. (the “Company”), DOES HEREBY CERTIFY that:





1.  The Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended December 31, 2010 (the “Report”), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.  Information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.





IN WITNESS WHEREOF, each of the undersigned has executed this statement this 15th day of February, 2011.











/s/ Timothy J. NeherTimothy J. NeherChief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to ACCELERATED ACQUISITIONS XII, INC. and will be retained by ACCELERATED ACQUISITIONS XII, INC. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### William MARKHAM, as Tax Assessor of Broward County, Florida, and State of Florida, Department of Revenue, Petitioners, v. BANK OF COMMERCE OF FLORIDA, as Trustee, Respondent.

No. 72-1087.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

July 13, 1973.

Petition for Certiorari withdrawn.
eworld_ex102.htm



EXHIBIT 10.2





 


 


The Company has an oral agreement with Genepharm Inc. to manufacture three types of cosmetic products for the Company.  Genepharm, Inc. owns the formulations for the products. Genepharm manufactures the products and packs them with E-World USA designed packaging under an oral agreement with the Company. The Company is authorized by to sell the products worldwide under the E-World brand name with infringing any rights of Genepharm, Inc.


 


There is no formal agreement on all the payment and purchase terms. We basically agree to purchase from them. Each payment and pricing is determined when we make an order from them.
# C_2015028EN.01000802.xml

| 28.1.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 28/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.1.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 28/8

---

Information communicated by Member States regarding closure of fisheries

(2015/C 28/07)

In accordance with Article 35(3) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1224/2009 of 20 November 2009 establishing a Community control system for ensuring compliance with the rules of the common fisheries policy (1), a decision has been taken to close the fishery as set down in the following table:

1

| Date and time of closure | 20.12.2014 |
| --- | --- |
| Duration | 20.12.2014-31.12.2014 |
| Member State | Germany |
| Stock or Group of stocks | MAC/8C3411 |
| Species | Mackerel (Scomber scombrus) |
| Zone | VIIIc, IX and X; Union waters of CECAF 34.1.1 |
| Type(s) of fishing vessels | — |
| Reference number | 83/TQ43 |

Date and time of closure

20.12.2014

Duration

20.12.2014-31.12.2014

Member State

Germany

Stock or Group of stocks

MAC/8C3411

Species

Mackerel (Scomber scombrus)

Scomber scombrus

Zone

VIIIc, IX and X; Union waters of CECAF 34.1.1

Type(s) of fishing vessels

—

Reference number

83/TQ43

---

(1)  OJ L 343, 22.12.2009, p. 1.

1

---
# C_2015280EN.01000701.xml

| 25.8.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 280/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.8.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 280/7

---

Notice of the impending expiry of certain anti-dumping measures

(2015/C 280/08)

1.   As provided for in Article 11(2) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009 of 30 November 2009 (1) on protection against dumped imports from countries not members of the European Community, the Commission gives notice that, unless a review is initiated in accordance with the following procedure, the anti-dumping measures mentioned below will expire on the date mentioned in the table below.

1

2.   Procedure

Procedure

Union producers may lodge a written request for a review. This request must contain sufficient evidence that the expiry of the measures would be likely to result in a continuation or recurrence of dumping and injury.

Should the Commission decide to review the measures concerned, importers, exporters, representatives of the exporting country and Union producers will then be provided with the opportunity to amplify, rebut or comment on the matters set out in the review request.

3.   Time limit

Time limit

Union producers may submit a written request for a review on the above basis, to reach the European Commission, Directorate-General for Trade (Unit H-1), CHAR 4/39, 1049 Brussels, Belgium (2) at any time from the date of the publication of the present notice but no later than three months before the date mentioned in the table below.

2

4.   This notice is published in accordance with Article 11(2) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009 of 30 November 2009.

| Product | Country(ies) of origin or exportation | Measures | Reference | Date of expiry (3) |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Coated fine paper | The People’s Republic of China | Anti-dumping duty | Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 451/2011 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty and collecting definitively the provisional duty imposed on imports of coated fine paper originating in the People’s Republic of China (OJ L 128, 14.5.2011, p. 1). | 15.5.2016 |

Product

Country(ies) of origin or exportation

Measures

Reference

Date of expiry (3)

3

Coated fine paper

The People’s Republic of China

Anti-dumping duty

Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 451/2011 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty and collecting definitively the provisional duty imposed on imports of coated fine paper originating in the People’s Republic of China (OJ L 128, 14.5.2011, p. 1).

15.5.2016

---

(1)  OJ L 343, 22.12.2009, p. 51.

1

(2)  Fax: +32 22956505.

2

(3)  The measure expires at midnight of the day mentioned in this column.

3

---
Santa Barbara County APCD
# C_2018224EN.01020101.xml

| 27.6.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 224/201 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.6.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 224/201

---

P8_TA(2016)0459

EU-Kiribati Agreement on the short-stay visa waiver ***

European Parliament legislative resolution of 1 December 2016 on the draft Council decision on the conclusion, on behalf of the European Union, of the Agreement between the European Union and the Republic of Kiribati on the short-stay visa waiver (12092/2015 — C8-0253/2016 — 2015/0200(NLE))

(Consent)

(2018/C 224/39)

The European Parliament,

The European Parliament

| — | having regard to the draft Council decision (12092/2015), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the draft Council decision (12092/2015),

| — | having regard to the draft Agreement between the European Union and the Republic of Kiribati on the short-stay visa waiver (12091/2015), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the draft Agreement between the European Union and the Republic of Kiribati on the short-stay visa waiver (12091/2015),

| — | having regard to the request for consent submitted by the Council in accordance with Article 77(2)(a) and Article 218(6), second subparagraph, point (a)(v), of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (C8-0253/2016), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the request for consent submitted by the Council in accordance with Article 77(2)(a) and Article 218(6), second subparagraph, point (a)(v), of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (C8-0253/2016),

| — | having regard to Rule 99(1), first and third subparagraphs, Rule 99(2) and Rule 108(7) of its Rules of Procedure, |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to Rule 99(1), first and third subparagraphs, Rule 99(2) and Rule 108(7) of its Rules of Procedure,

| — | having regard to the recommendation of the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs (A8-0334/2016), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the recommendation of the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs (A8-0334/2016),

| 1. | Gives its consent to conclusion of the agreement; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Gives its consent to conclusion of the agreement;

| 2. | Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council, the Commission and the governments and parliaments of the Member States and of the Republic of Kiribati. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council, the Commission and the governments and parliaments of the Member States and of the Republic of Kiribati.

---
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-6371

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

DERRILL WADDELL,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Baltimore. Catherine C. Blake, District Judge.

(1:02-cv-00199-CCB; 1:03-cv-03164-CCB)

Submitted: July 25, 2006 Decided: August 1, 2006

Before WILLIAMS, MOTZ, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Derrill Waddell, Appellant Pro Se. Thomas Michael DiBiagio, United

States Attorney, Stephanie Agli Gallagher, Harry Mason Gruber,

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Baltimore, Maryland, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Derrill Waddell seeks to appeal the district court’s

order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000) motion. The

order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a

certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A

certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial

showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C.

§ 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by

demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that any

assessment of the constitutional claims by the district court is

debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by

the district court is likewise debatable. Miller-El v. Cockrell,

537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484

(2000); Rose v. Lee, 252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001). We have

independently reviewed the record and conclude that Waddell has not

made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of

appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
#### James L. SIMMONS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 2439.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Aug. 17, 1970.

Appeal from Court of Record, Broward County; Robert W. Tyson, Jr., Judge.

Appeal dismissed.
#### CALMAQUIP ENGINEERING WESTERN HEMISPHERE CORPORATION, Appellant, v. Irvin SCHWAM, Appellee.

No. 71-148.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Sept. 28, 1971.

Rehearing Denied Nov. 23, 1971.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
#### John Steven COOPER, Appellant, v. Louie L. WAINWRIGHT, Director of the Florida Division of Corrections, Appellee.

No. 73-160.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

March 1, 1973.

Rehearing Denied March 21, 1973.

Habeas corpus denied.
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Leon DUGAS.

No. 59742.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Sept. 19, 1977.

L. Howard McCurdy, Orleans Indigent Defender Program, New Orleans, for defendant-appellant.

William J. Guste, Jr., Atty. Gen., Barbara Rutledge, Asst. Atty. Gen., Harry F. Con-nick, Dist. Atty., Brian G. Meissner, Asst. Dist. Atty., for plaintiff-appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.