alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT LAUREN LINARES, CECILIA LOYOLA, ) JAMES STANLEY, SAMUEL UNGER, ) JACOB UNGER, CATHERINE UNGER, ) JESSICA MAGER, KARL MAGER, ) MARSHA MAGER, AMBER DINICOLA, ) ALEXIS DINICOLA, JOSEPH ) DINICOLA, ALEXA MCPHERON, ) MICHELLE MCPHERON, MICHELLE ) CARVALHO, NOAH RADLE, ) BENJAMIN RADLE, STEPHEN RADLE, ) AJ NESSLER, ANTHONY NESSLER ) and ALISON FAIELLA, ) ) Appellants, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D17-1729 ) SCHOOL BOARD OF PASCO ) COUNTY, ) ) Appellee. ) ) Opinion filed September 7, 2018. Appeal from the Division of Administrative Hearings. Sharon Carlstedt Britton and Caroline Newton Catchpole of Phelps Dunbar LLP, Tampa, for Appellants. Dennis J. Alfonso and Knute J. Nathe of McClain, Alfonso, Meeker & Nathe, Dade City, for Appellee.- 2 -

PER CURIAM.

In this appeal, several Pasco County parents and students (Parents) challenged an Administrative Law Judge's determination that the Pasco County School Board validly exercised its delegated legislative authority in approving a change of school attendance boundaries for the 2017-2018 school year (the Attendance Boundary Rule). While this appeal was pending, the Parents also had pending in the trial court a related but separate lawsuit alleging that the School Board had violated Florida's Sunshine Laws during its deliberations on the Attendance Boundary Rule. The Parents prevailed in that lawsuit, and the trial court quashed the Attendance Boundary Rule. The trial court denied the School Board's subsequent motion for rehearing, and the School Board has not appealed.

The challenged rule having been quashed, this appeal is dismissed as
moot. 1 See Fla. Citizens All., Inc. v. Sch. Bd. of Collier Cty., 247 So. 3d 720 (Fla. 2d DCA 2018); Lund v. Dep't of Health, 708 So. 2d 645, 646 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998) ("The general rule in Florida is that a case on appeal becomes moot when a change in circumstances occurs before an appellate court's decision, thereby making it impossible for the court to provide effectual relief."); cf. Freni v. Collier County, 573 So. 2d 1054, 1054 (Fla. 2d DCA 1991) (affirming an order denying as moot a temporary injunction to enjoin a referendum regarding a proposed tax where, after denial of the motion, the referendum was held and the appellants' position prevailed).

Dismissed. VILLANTI, SALARIO, and ROTHSTEIN-YOUAKIM, JJ., Concur.

1 It appears that the School Board has since conducted additional proceedings and, based on those, has approved a new change of school attendance boundaries.
#### Lawrence F. MARTIN, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

No. 43405.

Supreme Court of Florida.

April 12, 1973.

Certiorari denied. 271 So.2d 813.

CARLTON, C. J., and ROBERTS, ERVIN, ADKINS and BOYD, JJ., concur.
#### Wrightman KELLY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 70-686.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Oct. 11, 1971.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
# C_2014465EN.01002701.xml

| 24.12.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 465/27 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.12.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 465/27

---

Commission communication pursuant to Article 16(4) of Regulation (EC) No 1008/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council on common rules for the operation of air services in the Community

Establishment of public service obligations in respect of scheduled air services

(2014/C 465/16)

| Member State | Portugal |
| --- | --- |
| Route concerned | Bragança – Vila Real – Viseu – Cascais – Portimão |
| Date of entry into force of the public service obligations | From 1 June 2015 |
| Address where the text and any relevant information and/or documentation relating to the public service obligations can be obtained | All documents will be available from: http://www.saphety.com
  For further information please contact:





  Instituto Nacional de Aviação Civil, I.P. |
| Rua B, Edifícios 4, 5 e 6 — Aeroporto de Lisboa |
| 1749-034 Lisboa |
| PORTUGAL |
| Tel. +351 218423500 |
| Fax +351 218423582 |
| E-mail: concurso.osp@inac.pt |

Member State

Portugal

Route concerned

Bragança – Vila Real – Viseu – Cascais – Portimão

Date of entry into force of the public service obligations

From 1 June 2015

Address where the text and any relevant information and/or documentation relating to the public service obligations can be obtained

All documents will be available from: http://www.saphety.com

For further information please contact:

Instituto Nacional de Aviação Civil, I.P.

Rua B, Edifícios 4, 5 e 6 — Aeroporto de Lisboa

1749-034 Lisboa

PORTUGAL

Tel. +351 218423500

Fax +351 218423582

E-mail: concurso.osp@inac.pt

---
#### DUNES DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, Appellant, v. John R. TRINKLE, Jr., Appellee.

No. 72-57.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

March 14, 1973.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
EX10.1_2013.12.31-10Q LTIP SECOND AMENDMENT






EXHIBIT 10.1
SECOND AMENDMENT TO
ATWOOD OCEANICS, INC.
AMENDED AND RESTATED 2007 LONG-TERM INCENTIVE PLAN


WHEREAS, Atwood Oceanics, Inc., a Texas corporation (the “Company”), has established and maintains the Atwood Oceanics, Inc. Amended and Restated 2007 Long-Term Incentive Plan (the “Plan”); and


WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 10.1 of the Plan, the Company has the right to amend the Plan at any time by action of the Board of Directors of the Company (the “Board”), subject to prior approval by the Company’s stockholders to the extent such approval is determined to be required by applicable legal and/or stock exchange requirements; and


WHEREAS, the Company desires to amend the Plan to allow for certain awards thereunder to extend dividend equivalent rights; and 


WHEREAS, this amendment is not a material modification that is subject to prior stockholder approval; 


NOW, THEREFORE, the Plan is amended as follows:
1.    Section 3.3 shall be added to the Plan, effective as of November 21, 2013, to read as follows:
“SECTION 3.3  Dividends.
(a)   Dividends and Dividend Equivalent Rights.  Dividends or dividend equivalent rights may be extended to and made part of any Award, excluding SARs and Options, granted on or after November 21, 2013 that is denominated in Common Stock or units of Common Stock subject to such terms, conditions and restrictions as the Committee may establish. 
(b) Extraordinary Stock and Cash Dividends.  In the event of any Common Stock distribution or extraordinary distribution, (i) the number of shares of Common Stock reserved under this Plan and covered by outstanding Awards, (ii) the exercise price in respect of such Awards, (iii) the appropriate value and price determinations for such Awards, (iv) the per person limitation on Awards in Section 4.1 hereof and (v) the kind of shares covered thereby (including shares of another issuer) shall be adjusted as appropriate.”


Attested to by the Secretary of Atwood Oceanics, Inc. as adopted by the Board of Directors of Atwood Oceanics, Inc. this 21st day of November, 2013.




By:      /s/Walter A. Baker            
Walter A. Baker, Vice President, General      Counsel and Corporate Secretary
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 3411

To amend the Dairy Production Stabilization Act of 1983 to require that

members of the National Dairy Promotion and Research Board be elected

by milk producers and to prohibit bloc voting by cooperative associations

of milk producers in the election of the producers, and for other purposes.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

OCTOBER 28, 1993

Mr. OBEY introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee

on Agriculture

A BILL

To amend the Dairy Production Stabilization Act of 1983

to require that members of the National Dairy Promotion and Research Board be elected by milk producers

and to prohibit bloc voting by cooperative associations

of milk producers in the election of the producers, and

for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘National Dairy Pro5 motion Reform Act of 1993’’.
2

•HR 3411 IH

1 SEC. 2. DAIRY VOTING REFORM.

2 Section 113(b) of the Dairy Production Stabilization

3 Act of 1983 (7 U.S.C. 4504(b)) is amended—

4 (1) by designating the first and second sen5 tences as paragraphs (1) and (2), respectively;

6 (2) by designating the third through fifth sen7 tences as paragraph (3);

8 (3) by designating the sixth sentence as para9 graph (4);

10 (4) by designating the seventh and eighth sen11 tences as paragraph (5);

12 (5) by designating the ninth sentence as para13 graph (6);

14 (6) in paragraph (1) (as so designated), by

15 striking ‘‘and appointment’’;

16 (7) by striking paragraph (2) (as so designated)

17 and inserting the following new paragraph:

18 ‘‘(2)(A)(i) Subject to clause (ii), members of the

19 Board shall be milk producers nominated in accordance

20 with subparagraph (B) and elected by a vote of producers

21 through a process established by the Secretary.

22 ‘‘(ii) In carrying out clause (i), the Secretary shall

23 not permit an organization certified under section 114 to

24 vote on behalf of the members of the organization.

25 ‘‘(B) Nominations shall be submitted by organiza26 tions certified under section 114, or, if the Secretary de-
3

•HR 3411 IH

1 termines that a substantial number of milk producers are

2 not members of, or the interests of the producers are not

3 represented by, a certified organization, from nominations

4 submitted by the producers in the manner authorized by

5 the Secretary. In submitting nominations, each certified

6 organization shall demonstrate to the satisfaction of the

7 Secretary that the milk producers who are members of the

8 organization have been fully consulted in the nomination

9 process.’’;

10 (8) in the first sentence of paragraph (3) (as so

11 designated), by striking ‘‘In making such appoint12 ments,’’ and inserting ‘‘In establishing the process

13 for the election of members of the Board,’’; and

14 (9) in paragraph (4) (as so designated)—

15 (A) by striking ‘‘appointment’’ and insert16 ing ‘‘election’’; and

17 (B) by striking ‘‘appointments’’ and insert18 ing ‘‘elections’’.

Æ
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         August 23, 2018.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Elizabeth Reed, 202-268-3179.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on August 20, 2018, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail & First-Class Package Service Contract 86 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2018-211, CP2018-293.                

Elizabeth Reed,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2018-18226 Filed 8-22-18; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

June 9, 2014

No. 04-14-00120-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF R.A.G.C., ET AL., CHILDREN,

From the 131st Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2011-CI-00860

Honorable Martha B. Tanner, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

The Joint Motion to Expedite Ruling on Joint Motion to Abate Appeal Pending

Mediation and Suspend All Deadlines is hereby MOOT.

_________________________________

Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 9th day of June, 2014.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
## 

Exhibit 23.1

CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements (Form S-8 Nos. 333-44526, 333-95339 and 333-65693) pertaining
to the 1998 Long-Term Incentive Plan, as amended, the Employee Stock Purchase Plan, as amended, the Directors' Stock Option Plan, as amended, and the Non-U.S. Stock Purchase
Plan of MIPS Technologies, Inc. of our report dated July 15, 2000, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of MIPS Technologies, Inc. included in the Annual Report
(Form 10-K) for the year ended June 30, 2000.

/s/
Ernst & Young LLP

San
Jose, California
September 21, 2000

---

## QuickLinks
# C_2014164EN.01000101.xml

| 29.5.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 164/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.5.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 164/1

---

Notice for the attention of the persons subject to the restrictive measures provided for in Council Decision 2014/145/CFSP, as amended by Council Decision 2014/308/CFSP, and in Council Regulation (EU) No 269/2014 as implemented by Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 577/2014 concerning restrictive measures in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine

(2014/C 164/01)

The following information is brought to the attention of the persons that appear in the Annex to Council Decision 2014/145/CFSP (1), as amended by Council Decision 2014/308/CFSP (2), and in Annex I to Council Regulation (EU) No 269/2014 (3), as implemented by Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 577/2014 (4) concerning restrictive measures in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine.

1

2

3

4

The Council of the European Union has decided that the persons that appear in the abovementioned Annexes should be included in the list of persons and entities subject to restrictive measures provided for in Decision 2014/145/CFSP and in Regulation (EU) No 269/2014 concerning restrictive measures in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine. The grounds for designations of those persons appear in the relevant entries in those Annexes.

The attention of the persons concerned is drawn to the possibility of making an application to the competent authorities of the relevant Member State(s) as indicated in the websites in Annex II to Regulation (EU) No 269/2014, in order to obtain an authorisation to use frozen funds for basic needs or specific payments (cf. Article 4 of the Regulation).

The persons concerned may submit a request to the Council, together with supporting documentation, that the decision to include them on the abovementioned list should be reconsidered, to the following address:

| Council of the European Union |
| --- |
| General Secretariat |
| DG C 1C |
| Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175 |
| 1048 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |
| e-mail: sanctions@consilium.europa.eu. |

Council of the European Union

General Secretariat

DG C 1C

Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175

1048 Bruxelles/Brussel

BELGIQUE/BELGIË

e-mail: sanctions@consilium.europa.eu.

The attention of the persons concerned is also drawn to the possibility of challenging the Council’s decision before the General Court of the European Union, in accordance with the conditions laid down in Article 275, 2nd paragraph, and Article 263, 4th and 6th paragraphs, of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union.

---

(1)  OJ L 78, 17.3.2014, p. 16.

1

(2)  OJ L 160, 29.5.2014, p. 34.

2

(3)  OJ L 78, 17.3.2014, p. 6.

3

(4)  OJ L 160, 29.5.2014, p. 7.

4

---
# C_2015139EN.01001101.xml

| 28.4.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 139/11 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.4.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 139/11

---

Corrigendum to the communication from Ireland pursuant to Directive 94/22/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on the conditions for granting and using authorisations for the prospection, exploration and production of hydrocarbons (Announcement of 2015 Atlantic Margin Licensing Round)

(
  Official Journal of the European Union C 102 of 27 March 2015
  )

Official Journal of the European Union C 102 of 27 March 2015

(2015/C 139/07)

On page 6:

for:

for

‘Applications should be clearly marked “2015 Licensing Round – Atlantic Margin” and should be addressed to “The Petroleum Affairs Division, Department of Communications, Energy and Natural Resources, 29-31 Adelaide Road, Dublin 2, Ireland”. Applications must be received not later than 12 noon on Wednesday 16 September 2015.’,

read:

read

‘Applications should be clearly marked “2015 Licensing Round – Atlantic Margin” and should be addressed to “The Petroleum Affairs Division, Department of Communications, Energy and Natural Resources, 29-31 Adelaide Road, Dublin 2, Ireland”. Applications must be received not later than 12 noon on Wednesday 16 September 2015. Applications should not be submitted prior to Monday, 31 August 2015.’.

---
----

----

Corporate Capital Trust, Inc. 10-Q
| Date: November 14, 2012            |   |   |   | By:   |   | /s/ Andrew A. Hyltin          |
|------------------------------------|--------|--------|--------|-----------------|--------|-------------------------------|
|                               |   |   |   |            |   | ANDREW A. HYLTIN              |
|                               |   |   |   |            |   | Chief Executive Officer       |
|                               |   |   |   |            |   | (Principal Executive Officer) |
|                               |   |   |   |            |   |                          |
| Date: November  14, 2012 |   |   |   | By:   |   | /s/ Paul S. Saint-Pierre      |
|                               |   |   |   |            |   | PAUL S. SAINT-PIERRE          |
|                               |   |   |   |            |   | Chief Financial Officer       |
|                               |   |   |   |            |   | (Principal Financial Officer) |

----
# C_2012366EN.01000202.xml

| 24.11.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 366/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.11.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 366/2

---

Election of the President of the Court

2012/C 366/03

At a meeting on 9 October 2012, the Judges of the Court of Justice elected, pursuant to the first paragraph of Article 9a of the Statute of the Court of Justice of the European Union, Mr Skouris as President of the Court for the period from 9 October 2012 to 6 October 2015.

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND> This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from
the Form 10-K for year ended December 31, 1998 and is qualified in its entirety
by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                         DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                            JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                              DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                         13,209
<SECURITIES>                                  117,878
<RECEIVABLES>                                       0
<ALLOWANCES>                                        0
<INVENTORY>                                         0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                    0
<PP&E>                                      1,213,685
<DEPRECIATION>                                 48,816
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              4,510,357
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               0
<BONDS>                                     1,280,372
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                   257,642
<COMMON>                                          491
<OTHER-SE>                                  2,164,846
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                4,510,357
<SALES>                                             0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                              165,477
<CGS>                                               0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                 239,625
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             82,203
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             (156,351)
<INCOME-TAX>                                 (49,790)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 0
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                17,657
<CHANGES>                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                (157,104)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (1.29)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (1.29)


</TABLE>
1

ROY LYNN FOREHAND,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D15-2788

__________________________/

Opinion filed October 1, 2015.

An appeal from an order of the Circuit Court for Bay County.

Brantley S. Clark, Jr., Judge.

Roy Lynn Forehand, pro se, Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Matthew Pavese, Assistant Attorney 

General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

ROBERTS, C.J., THOMAS and RAY, JJ., CONCUR.