alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
ex10-1.htm


Exhibit 10.1


 


AMENDMENT


 


TO


 


AMENDED AND RESTATED CREDIT AGREEMENT


 


AND TO


 


LINE OF CREDIT NOTE


 


AND TO


 


AMENDED AND RESTATED SECURITY AGREEMENT


 


BETWEEN


 


JP MORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A. AND SKYMALL, LLC


 







This Amendment to Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, and to Line of Credit Note and to Amended and Restated Security Agreement is entered into as of January 31, 2014 and effective as of December 31, 2013 between JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. (“Bank”) and SkyMall, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (“Borrower”) and amends (a) the Amended and Restated Credit Agreement dated May 10, 2013, as amended, between Bank and Borrower, and (b) the Line of Credit Note dated May 10, 2013 payable by Borrower to Bank, and (c) the Amended and Restated Security Agreement dated May 10, 2013, as amended, between Bank and Borrower.


 


R E C I T A L S


 


A. The recitals contained in the Waiver and Limited Consent Agreement (“Consent”) dated December 31, 2013 among Bank, Borrower and SMXE Lending, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (“Subordinated Lender”) are hereby incorporated by this reference.


 


A G R E E M E N T S


 


1. Credit Agreement. The Amended and Restated Credit Agreement is hereby amended as follows:


 


a. Section 2K (which references “extensions” of indebtedness) is amended to include, for clarity, but without limitation, the extension pursuant to the amendment to the Line of Credit Note pursuant to Section 2 below.


 


2. Note. The Line of Credit Note is hereby amended as follows:  In the first sentence, “July 1, 2014” is changed to “June 30, 2015.”


 


3. Security Agreement. The Amended and Restated Security Agreement is hereby amended as follows: The definition of “Liabilities” (which references “extensions” of indebtedness) is amended to include, for clarity but without limitation, the extension pursuant to the amendment to the Line of Credit Note pursuant to Section 2 above.









  





  











  






 


 


4. Incorporation by reference. Sections 1-11 of the Consent are hereby incorporated by this reference.  For avoidance of doubt, but without limitation, the effectiveness of this Amendment is conditioned upon the satisfaction of all conditions in Sections 1.1 through 1.9 of the Consent.


 


 


 



	
Address(es) for Notices:


1520 E. Pima Street


Phoenix, AZ 85034-4639


Attn:  Scott Wiley

	
Borrower:


SkyMall, LLC


 


By:  /s/ Scott Wiley


        Scott Wiley                     CFO 


        


 


Date Signed:  January 31, 2014


 


	
Address for Notices:


201 N. Central Ave, 21st Floor, AZ1-1178


Phoenix, AZ 85004


Attn:  Greg Geist

	
Bank:


JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.


 


By: /s/ Jeffrey M Hoyt


       Jeffrey M. Hoyt                 SVP


       


Date Signed: January 31, 2014
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In  connection  with the  Quarterly  Report of Aurum Resources Corp. (the "Company")  on Form 10-Q/A for the period  ended  October 31,  2010 as filed with the Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof (the  "Report"),  the undersigned,  in the  capacities  and  on  the  dates  indicated  below,  hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:



1.   The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of  1934; and



2.   The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all material respects,  the financial  condition and   results of operations  of the Company.



Date: February 11, 2011





/s/ Danil Shpeyzer

__________________________

Danil Shpeyzer, President,

Chief Executive Officer and

Chief Financial Officer
#### UNITED FARM AGENCY, Appellant, v. Paul C. SUMNER and Louella H. Sumner, d/b/a Sumner and Sumner, Appellees.

No. 70-231.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Dec. 2, 1970.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
# C_2014225EN.01000301.xml

| 16.7.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 225/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.7.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 225/3

---

Explanatory Notes to the Combined Nomenclature of the European Union

(2014/C 225/04)

Pursuant to the second indent of Article 9(1)(a) of Council Regulation (EEC) No 2658/87 (1), the Explanatory Notes to the Combined Nomenclature of the European Union (2) are hereby amended as follows:

1

2

On page 155, the Explanatory note to CN subheadings ‘3301 12 10 to 3301 19 80 Essential oils of citrus fruit’ is replaced by the following:

On page 155, the Explanatory note to CN subheadings ‘3301 12 10 to 3301 19 80 Essential oils of citrus fruit

| ‘3301 12 10 | Essential oils of citrus fruit |
| --- | --- |
| to | |
| 3301 19 80 | These oils are obtained, almost entirely, from the peel of the fruit. They have a pleasant odour which is similar to that of the fruit used in their preparation. Orange-blossom oils or neroli oil are not regarded as essential oils of citrus fruit and are classified in subheading 3301 29 41 or 3301 29 91.
  A deterpenated essential oil is an essential oil where the content of the monoterpenic hydrocarbons has been partially or completely removed.’ |

‘3301 12 10

Essential oils of citrus fruit

to

3301 19 80

These oils are obtained, almost entirely, from the peel of the fruit. They have a pleasant odour which is similar to that of the fruit used in their preparation. Orange-blossom oils or neroli oil are not regarded as essential oils of citrus fruit and are classified in subheading 3301 29 41 or 3301 29 91.

A deterpenated essential oil is an essential oil where the content of the monoterpenic hydrocarbons has been partially or completely removed.’

---

(1)  Council Regulation (EEC) No 2658/87 of 23 July 1987 on the tariff and statistical nomenclature and on the Common Customs Tariff (OJ L 256, 7.9.1987, p. 1).

1

(2)  OJ C 137, 6.5.2011, p. 1.

2

---
# C_2015418EN.01001401.xml

| 16.12.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 418/14 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.12.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 418/14

---

Commission notice on current State aid recovery interest rates and reference/discount rates for 28 Member States applicable as from 1 January 2016

(Published in accordance with Article 10 of Commission Regulation (EC) No 794/2004 of 21 April 2004 (
  OJ L 140, 30.4.2004, p. 1
  ))

Published in accordance with Article 10 of Commission Regulation (EC) No 794/2004 of 21 April 2004

OJ L 140, 30.4.2004, p. 1

(2015/C 418/06)

Base rates calculated in accordance with the communication from the Commission on the revision of the method for setting the reference and discount rates (OJ C 14, 19.1.2008, p. 6.). Depending on the use of the reference rate, the appropriate margins have still to be added as defined in this communication. For the discount rate this means that a margin of 100 basis points has to be added. The Commission Regulation (EC) No 271/2008 of 30 January 2008 amending Regulation (EC) No 794/2004 foresees that, unless otherwise provided for in a specific decision, the recovery rate will also be calculated by adding 100 basis points to the base rate.

Modified rates are indicated in bold.

Previous table published in OJ C 333, 9.10.2015, p. 3.

| From | To | AT | BE | BG | CY | CZ | DE | DK | EE | EL | ES | FI | FR | HR | HU | IE | IT | LT | LU | LV | MT | NL | PL | PT | RO | SE | SI | SK | UK |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1.1.2016 | ... | 0,12 | 0,12 | 1,63 | 0,12 | 0,46 | 0,12 | 0,36 | 0,12 | 0,12 | 0,12 | 0,12 | 0,12 | 1,92 | 1,37 | 0,12 | 0,12 | 0,12 | 0,12 | 0,12 | 0,12 | 0,12 | 1,83 | 0,12 | 1,65 | -0,22 | 0,12 | 0,12 | 1,04 |

From

To

AT

BE

BG

CY

CZ

DE

DK

EE

EL

ES

FI

FR

HR

HU

IE

IT

LT

LU

LV

MT

NL

PL

PT

RO

SE

SI

SK

UK

1.1.2016

...

0,12

0,12

0,12

0,12

1,63

1,63

0,12

0,12

0,46

0,46

0,12

0,12

0,36

0,36

0,12

0,12

0,12

0,12

0,12

0,12

0,12

0,12

0,12

0,12

1,92

1,92

1,37

1,37

0,12

0,12

0,12

0,12

0,12

0,12

0,12

0,12

0,12

0,12

0,12

0,12

0,12

0,12

1,83

1,83

0,12

0,12

1,65

1,65

-0,22

-0,22

0,12

0,12

0,12

0,12

1,04

1,04

---
**I am joining Alaska Airlines in its effort to provide convenient service from**

**Portland to our nation's capital.** Docket No. DOT
- OST
- 2012
- 0029 Dear Secretary LaHood: I am writing in support of the application of Alaska Airlines, Inc. to provide a daily direct flight to Reagan National Airport (DCA) from Portland International Airport (PDX). I believe that Alaska is the right choice. With their large Portland hub presence, strong customer service focus and track record for operational reliability, the car rier is best suited to provide a nonstop PDX to DCA flight. Portland is the second largest market to the Washington DC area without nonstop service to DCA. With a nonstop route from PDX to DCA, Oregon and S.W. Washington residents will no longer be forced to use m ore tim e - consuming and less convenient service to our nation's capital. I respectfully urge you to grant Alaska Airlines' application to serve PDX
- DCA.
Kenneth Michael Cowden Portland, Oregon
* After examining the briefs and the record, we have concluded that oral argument is

unnecessary. Thus, the appeal is submitted on the briefs and the record. See Fed. R. App. P.

34(a)(2). 

# United States Court of Appeals

For the Seventh Circuit

Chicago, Illinois 60604

Submitted October 8, 2009 *

Decided October 9, 2009

Before

FRANK H. EASTERBROOK, Chief Judge

RICHARD A. POSNER, Circuit Judge

TERENCE T. EVANS, Circuit Judge

No. 09

‐ 1905

JOHNATHAN M. COURSEY,

Plaintiff

‐ Appellant

,

v.

BRAD SCOTT, et al.,

Defendants

‐ Appellees. Appeal from the United States District

Court for the Central District of Illinois.

No. 1:07

‐ cv

‐ 01123

‐ MMM

‐ JAG

Michael M. Mihm,

Judge

.

O R D E R

Johnathan Coursey, a Peoria resident, filed a complaint under 42 U.S.C. § 1983

against the City of Peoria, the Peoria police department, and two Peoria police officers

alleging violations of his Fourth Amendment rights related to a warrantless entry of his NONPRECEDENTIAL DISPOSITION

To be cited only in accordance with

Fed. R. App. P. 32.1No. 09

‐ 1905 Page 2

home and subsequent arrest. The district court dismissed the City of Peoria and the Peoria

police department from the suit and later granted summary judgment in favor of the

officers.

Coursey appeals, but we cannot discern any legal argument in his submission.

Although we construe pro se filings liberally, pro se litigants must follow procedural rules.

See Collins v. Illinois

, 554 F.3d 693, 697 (7th Cir. 2009). Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure

28 requires that the appellant’s brief present “contentions and the reasons for them, with

citations to the authorities and parts of the record on which the appellant relies.” F ED

. R.

A PP

. P. 28(a)(9)(A). As we have explained, “a brief must contain an argument consisting of

more than a generalized assertion of error, with citations to supporting authority.” Anderson

v. Hardman

, 241 F.3d 544, 545 (7th Cir. 2001).

Coursey’s brief consists only of a cursory factual narrative and a short list of

questions about the facts of the case. Coursey makes no reference to the district court’s

reasoning, cites no legal authority, and, in short, makes no argument.

DISMISSED.
### Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h

Elizabeth A. Weave r

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathaway,

J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk November 23, 2009

1116 

# Order

November 23, 2009

139618

ROBERT FORTUNATE, Plaintiff-Appellant,

v SC: 139618 COA: 288548 Wayne CC: 08-111489-CK FOSTER, MEADOWS & BALLARD, P.C., Defendant-Appellee.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application fo r leave to appeal the July 28, 2009 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.
#### Edna Earl EDWARDS and Clarice Parker, Appellants, v. Ruby H. WARD et al., Appellees.

No. 46585.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

March 13, 1972.

Rehearing Denied April 17, 1972.

Laurel G. Weir, Philadelphia, for appellants.

Clayton Taylor Lewis, Philadelphia, for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
#### CITY OF CORAL GABLES, a Municipal Corporation in the State of Florida, et al., Appellants, v. Webster E. PRESTON, Appellee.

No. 71-775.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Sept. 24, 1971.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed.
252 La. 835

#### Hugh T. BRAMLETTE v. Rufus J. HEBERT.

No. 49358.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Oct. 3, 1968.

In re: Hugh T. Bramlette applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, Parish of St. Landry. 210 So.2d 361.

Writ refused. On the facts found by the Court of Appeal there appears no error of law in its judgment.
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.3

                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

The Board of Directors
Compania de Radiocomunicaciones Moviles S.A.

    We hereby consent to the use in this Registration Statement on Form S-1 of
Propel Inc. of our report dated January 20, 2000 relating to the consolidated
financial statements of Compania de Radiocomunicaciones Moviles S.A. and
subsidiary, which appears in such Registration Statement. We also consent to the
reference to our firm under the heading "Experts" in such Registration
Statement.

                                           /s/ PriceWaterhouseCoopers

Buenos Aires, Argentina
June 21, 2000
# C o u rt o f

A p p ea ls

o f t h e S t a te o f

G eo rg ia

ATLANTA,_

_ _ __ _ _ __ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ __ _
Th e Co u rt

o f Ap p ea l s h er eb y p a s s es t h e f

o ll owi n g o r der :

A1 6 D0 10 2

. J AQUENETTE D. RUCKER-MASON v
. D BI / ASI / MTG HOLDI N GS, LLC.

J aq u en et t e Ru ck er-M as o n fi l ed t h is ap p l i cat i o n fo r d i s cret i o n ary ap p eal

s eek i n g rev i ew o f an o rd er en t ered b y th e Fay et t e Co u nt y M ag i s t r a t e Co u rt i n t h i s d i s p o s s es s o ry act i o n. “ Th e o nl y av en u e o f ap p eal av ai l ab l e fro m t h e m ag i s t rat e co u rt ju d g m en t i s pro v i d ed b y OCGA § 1 5-1 0 -4 1 (b ) (1 ), wh i ch al l o ws fo r a d e no v o ap p eal

t o t h e s t at e o r s u peri o r co u rt .” Ha n d l er v. Hu l s ey , 19 9 Ga. Ap p

. 7 5 1

, 7 51 (4 0 6 SE2 d

2 2 5 ) (1 9 9 1 ). Th i s Co u rt t h u s m ay ad dres s m ag i s t rat e co u rt m at t ers o n l y i f t h ey al read y h av e b een rev i ewed b y t h e s t at e o r s up eri o r co u rt

. S e e We s t w i n d Co r p

. v.
W a s h i n g t o n Fed . S

& L As s n

. , 1 9 5 Ga. Ap p . 4 1 1 , 4 11 (3 9 3 SE2 d 4 7 9 ) (1 9 9 0 ).

Th e G e o r g i a Co ns t i tu t i o n p ro v i d es t h at “ [a] n y co u rt s h al l tran s fer t o t h e

ap p ro p ri at e co u rt i n t h e s t at e an y ci v i l cas e i n wh ich i t d et erm i n es t hat ju ri s di ct i o n o r

v en ue l i es el s ewh ere

. ” G a. Co n s t

. o f 1 98 3

, A rt

. V I, Sec. I, Par. V III; Bo s ma v.
Gu n t er , 2 5 8 Ga. 6 64

, 6 65 (3 73 SE2 d 3 6 8 ) (1 9 8 8 ). Acco rd i n gl y , t h i s ap p eal i s h ereb y
TRANSFERRED t o t h e Fay et t e Co u n t y St at e Co u rt

.

C o u r t o f A p p e a l s o f t h e S t a t e o

f G e o r g ia
C le r k ’ s O f f i c e , A t la n t a ,

_

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ I c e r t i f y th a t t h e a b o v e i s a t r u e e x t r a c t f r o m

t h e m i n u t e s o

f t h e C o u r t o

f A p p e a l s o f G e o r g i a

. W i tn e s s m y s i g n a t u r e a n d t h e s e a l o

f s a i d c o u r t

h e r e t o a f f i x e d t h e d a y a n d y e a r l a s t a b o v e w r i t t e n

.

, C l e r k

. 11/19/2015 November 19, 2015
|                                        1.                                                            | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               |                                                                                                                                                 |
|                                                 2. | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |

|         | Energy Today, Inc. |                    |
|--------------|--------------------|-------------------------|
|         | (Registrant)  |                    |
| May 20, 2013 | By:                | /s/ Thomas Makmann      |   |
|         |               | Thomas Makmann          |   |
|         |               | President and Principal |   |
#### Clara LAWHON, Appellant, v. Anthony GRECO and Frances Greco, his wife, Appellees.

No. 66-528.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Third District.

March 14, 1967.

Miller & Capp, Ft. Lauderdale, for appellant.

Joseph G. Weiss, Miami, for appellees.

Before PEARSON, CARROLL and BARKDULL, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed on the authority of Betz v. Bank of Miami Beach, Fla.1957, 95 So.2d 891.
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 21.1

                    CORAM HEALTHCARE CORPORATION SUBSIDIARIES

Coram, Inc.
Coram Service Corporation
Coram Independent Practice Association, Inc.
Coram Prescription Services, Inc.
Coram Resource Network, Inc.
CTI Network, Inc.
HealthInfusion, Inc.
H.M.S.S., Inc.
T2 Medical, Inc.
Coram Healthcare Corporation of Alabama
Coram Healthcare Corporation of Florida
Coram Healthcare Corporation of Greater D.C.
Coram Healthcare Corporation of Greater New York
Coram Healthcare Corporation of Indiana
Coram Healthcare Corporation of Kentucky
Coram Healthcare Corporation of Michigan
Coram Healthcare Corporation of Mississippi
Coram Healthcare Corporation of Nevada
Coram Healthcare Corporation of Northern California
Coram Healthcare Corporation of Rhode Island
Coram Healthcare Corporation of South Carolina
Coram Healthcare Corporation of Southern California
Coram Healthcare Corporation of Southern Florida
Coram Homecare of Minnesota, Inc.
Coram Homecare of Illinois, Inc.
Curaflex Health Services, Inc.
Coram Alternate Site Services, Inc.
Coram Healthcare Corporation of Massachusetts
Coram Healthcare Corporation of New York
Coram Healthcare Corporation of North Texas
Coram Healthcare Corporation of Utah
Coram Healthcare of Wyoming, LLC
Home Care Hawaii, LLP (51% Coram Service Corporation and 49% Curaflex)
Coram International Holdings Limited
Coram Healthcare Limited
Coram Pharmacy Limited
Wilcor Health Services
Carolina Home Therapeutics
Fairfax Hematology-Oncology, Inc.
Coram Homecare of Northern California, Inc.
/**
 * U.S. Census Bureau
 *
 * We have a machine-readable dataset discovery service. Visit our Discovery
 * Tool page to learn more.
 *
 * https://www.census.gov/data/developers/updates/new-discovery-tool.html
 *
 *
 * In alignment with the Digital Government Strategy, the Census Bureau is offering
 * the public wider access to key U.S. statistics. The Census application programming
 * interface (API) lets developers create custom apps to reach new users and makes
 * key demographic, socio-economic and housing statistics more accessible than
 * ever before. The Census Bureau’s API allows developers to design web and mobile
 * apps to explore or learn more about America's changing population and economy.
 *
 * https://www.census.gov/developers/
 */

$QF( function ($) {
  var
    cssPrefix = 'qf-';

  $( 'div.' + cssPrefix + 'faq-accordion' ).togglepanels();
} );


$QF.fn.togglepanels = function(){
  var
    a = 'ui-accordion',
    b = a + '-icons',
    c = a + '-content',
    d = a + '-header',
    e = d + '-active',
    f = 'ui-widget',
    g = f + '-content',
    h = 'ui-helper-reset',
    i = 'ui-corner-bottom',
    j = 'ui-corner-top',
    k = 'ui-state-default',
    l = 'ui-state-active',
    m = 'ui-icon',
    n = m + '-triangle-1-e',
    o = m + '-triangle-1-s';


  return this.each(function(){
    var
      $a = $QF(this);

    $a.addClass([a,b,f,h].join(' '))
    .find('h3')
    .addClass([d,h,i,j,l].join(' '))
    .hover(function() { $QF(this).toggleClass('ui-state-hover'); })
    .prepend('<span class="'+m+' '+n+'"></span>')
    .click(function() {
      $QF(this)
      .toggleClass([e,i,k,l].join(' '))
      .find('> .'+m).toggleClass([n,o].join(' ')).end()
      .next().slideToggle();
      return false;
    })
    .next()
    .addClass([c,g,h,i].join(' '));

    if ( /^\d+$/.test( window.location.hash.substring(1) ) ) {
      $a.find('h3').eq( window.location.hash.substring(1) - 1 ).click();
    }
  });
};
# C_2015367EN.01000604.xml

| 5.11.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 367/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.11.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 367/6

---

EUROPEAN INSTITUTE OF INNOVATION AND TECHNOLOGY

Publication of the final accounts for the financial year 2014

(2015/C 367/23)

The complete version of the final accounts may be found at the following address:

http://eit.europa.eu/interact/bookshelf/governing-board-decision-opinion-governing-board-final-accounts-2014

---