alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit No. 32.1


L2 Medical Development Company


File No. 0-54092


Form 10-Q


Quarter ended March 31, 2013








Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted


Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of L2 Medical Development Company (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2013 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Matthew C. Lipton, Chief Executive and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and


the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








Date: May 15, 2013
By: /s/ Matthew C. Lipton

Matthew C. Lipton

Chief Executive Officer

and Chief Financial Officer











A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to L2 Medical Development Company and will be retained by L2 Medical Development Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 3629

To rescind appropriations for the United States Postal Service in an amount

equal to the amount expended by the Postal Service in the design

and implementation of its new corporate logo.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

NOVEMBER 22, 1993

Mr. COPPERSMITH (for himself, Mr. CUNNINGHAM, Mr. KREIDLER, Mr.

STENHOLM, Mr. FINGERHUT, Mr. CANADY, Mr. CRANE, Mr. MCCANDLESS, Mr. POSHARD, Mr. EWING, Mr. ARCHER, Mr. HOCHBRUECKNER,

Mr. TAYLOR of Mississippi, Mr. GENE GREEN of Texas, Mr. LANCASTER,

Mr. KINGSTON, and Mr. GALLEGLY) introduced the following bill; which

was referred to the Committee on Appropriations

A BILL

To rescind appropriations for the United States Postal Service in an amount equal to the amount expended by

the Postal Service in the design and implementation of

its new corporate logo.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Postal Service Fiscal

5 Responsibility Act of 1993’’.
2

•HR 3629 IH

1 SEC. 2. CONGRESSIONAL FINDINGS.

2 The Congress finds that—

3 (1) the decision by the United States Postal

4 Service to change its corporate logo is inconsistent

5 with tight budgetary times;

6 (2) the United States Postal Service should

7 concentrate on more substantive means of improving

8 its image among the public, such as increasing the

9 reliability of mail delivery, promoting excellence in

10 customer service, and fulfilling claims of job reduc11 tions;

12 (3) the Federal Government should act in a fis13 cally responsible manner, and should eschew cheap

14 and tawdry approaches to image improvement at

15 public expense; and

16 (4) the rescission of funds provided for in this

17 Act, which will take effect only if the United States

18 Postal Service persists in its plans for a new cor19 porate logo, is a legitimate exercise of the congres20 sional power of the purse.

21 SEC. 3. RESCISSION OF APPROPRIATIONS.

22 Of the funds made available for ‘‘POSTAL SERV23 ICE—Payment to the Postal Service Fund’’ in the Treas24 ury, Postal Service, and General Government Appropria25 tions Act, 1994 (Public Law 103–123), $6,600,000 shall

26 be rescinded on January 1, 1994, unless, prior to such
3

•HR 3629 IH

1 date, the Postmaster General notifies the Congress that

2 the United States Postal Service will not proceed with the

3 adoption and implementation of a new corporate logo.

Æ
Exhibit 32.1








CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. Section 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In connection with the Quarterly Report of CN Resources Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended November 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date here of (the “report”), I, Oliver Xing, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated this 23rd day of February, 2011.








OLIVER XINGOliver XingChief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997             DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1997             APR-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997             DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                           2,734                       0
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   67,581                       0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0                       0
<INVENTORY>                                      4,213                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                79,616                       0
<PP&E>                                         180,399                       0
<DEPRECIATION>                                  44,344                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 233,777                       0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           34,803                       0
<BONDS>                                         52,120<F1>                   0<F1>
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                           150                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     128,343                       0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   233,777                       0
<SALES>                                        118,961                 342,272
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0                       0
<CGS>                                                0                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  109,707                 316,146
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    (8)                    (25)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   233                     861
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,042                   4,168
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  8,220                  21,983
<INCOME-TAX>                                     3,286                   8,792
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0                       0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                     4,934                  13,191
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0                       0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0                       0
<FN>
<F1> Long-Term Debt
</FN>


</TABLE>
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 3461

To amend part E of title IV of the Social Security Act to require States

to administer qualifying examinations to all State employees with new

authority to make decisions regarding child welfare services.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

NOVEMBER 8, 1993

Mrs. MALONEY introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Ways and Means

A BILL

To amend part E of title IV of the Social Security Act

to require States to administer qualifying examinations

to all State employees with new authority to make decisions regarding child welfare services.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 3461 IH

1 SECTION 1. REQUIREMENT THAT STATES ADMINISTER

2 QUALIFYING EXAMINATIONS TO ALL STATE

3 EMPLOYEES WITH NEW AUTHORITY TO MAKE

4 DECISIONS REGARDING CHILD WELFARE

5 SERVICES.

6 Section 474 of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C.

7 674) is amended by adding at the end the following:

8 ‘‘(f) The Secretary may not make a payment to a

9 State under subsection (a) for any calendar quarter begin10 ning after the 18-month period that begins with the date

11 of the enactment of this subsection, unless the State has

12 in effect procedures to ensure that, before the State pro13 vides to a prospective child welfare decisionmaker the au14 thority to make decisions regarding child welfare services,

15 the individual must take and pass an examination, admin16 istered by the State, that tests knowledge of such subjects

17 as child development, family dynamics, dysfunctional be18 havior, substance abuse, child abuse, and community ad19 vocacy. As used in the preceding sentence, the term ‘pro20 spective child welfare decisionmaker’ means an individual

21 who, on the date of the enactment of this subsection, does

22 not have any authority to make a decision regarding child

23 welfare services.’’.

Æ
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Ernest VINCENT.

No. 53542.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Oct. 29, 1973.

Donald R. Jory, Jory & Donald, Jennings, for defendant-appellant.

William J. Guste, Jr., Atty. Gen., LeRoy A. Hartley, Asst. Atty. Gen., Bernard N. Marcantel, Dist. Atty., for plaintiff-appel-lee.

MARCUS, Justice.

After trial under an indictment charging manslaughter (R.S. 14:31), conviction by a jury and sentence to serve ten. years at hard labor, defendant perfected this appeal, relying on one bill of exceptions.

*564This bill was reserved to the denial of a motion for a new trial. The motion urges that the verdict is contrary to the law and the evidence in that there was either no evidence or insufficient evidence to show that the defendant did not act in self defense. The motion presents solely the factual assertion that the evidence was not sufficient to justify the verdict.

In denying the motion, the trial court found that ample evidence was presented to support the verdict.

The allegation that the verdict is contrary to the law and the evidence presents no question of law for our review. State v. Landry, 262 La. 32, 262 So.2d 360 (1972); State v. Grey, 257 La. 1070, 245 So.2d 178 (1971). The sufficiency of the evidence is not reviewable on appeal; it is only where there is no evidence to support an essential element necessary to the conviction that the court will review the record on appeal. See State v. Robinson, 261 La. 1029, 261 So.2d 654 (1972). Despite this, we have carefully reviewed the record which was made part of the bill of exceptions and conclude, as did the trial judge, that there was some evidence upon which the jury could reach its verdict. There was evidence to support all essential elements of the crime, as well as that the killing was not justifiable.

For the reasons assigned, the conviction and sentence are affirmed.

BARHAM, J., concurs with reasons.

BARHAM, Justice

(concurring).

I concur in the result; however, I make a strong point of difference with the majority’s preliminary statement that an allegation in a motion for new trial which urges *no evidence*fails to present an issue for our review.

When a motion for new trial presents the question of “no evidence” as opposed to “insufficient evidence”, a question of law is presented which must be reviewed by this Court on appeal.
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3509 Reported in House (RH)]

                                                 Union Calendar No. 210

103d CONGRESS

  1st Session

                               H. R. 3509

                          [Report No. 103-382]

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

       To approve a Governing International Fisheries Agreement.

_______________________________________________________________________

                           November 19, 1993

  Reported with an amendment, committed to the Committee of the Whole 
       House on the State of the Union, and ordered to be printed

                                                 Union Calendar No. 210
103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3509

                          [Report No. 103-382]

       To approve a Governing International Fisheries Agreement.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           November 15, 1993

   Mr. Studds (for himself, Mr. Manton, Mr. Young of Alaska, and Mr. 
 Fields of Texas) introduced the following bill; which was referred to 
             the Committee on Merchant Marine and Fisheries

                           November 19, 1993

      Additional sponsors: Mr. Tauzin, Mr. Coble, and Mr. Lipinski

                           November 19, 1993

  Reported with an amendment, committed to the Committee of the Whole 
       House on the State of the Union, and ordered to be printed
                  [Insert the part printed in italic]

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
       To approve a Governing International Fisheries Agreement.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled, That the Agreement 
between the Government of the United States of America and the 
Government of the Russian Federation on Mutual Fisheries Relations 
which was entered into on May 31, 1988, and which expired by its terms 
on October 28, 1993, may be brought into force again for the United 
States through an exchange of notes between the United States of 
America and the Russian Federation and may remain in force and effect 
on the part of the United States until May 1, 1994, and may be amended 
or extended by a subsequent agreement to which section 203 of the 
Magnuson Fishery Conservation and Management Act (16 U.S.C. 1823) 
applies.
    Sec. 2. Section 304(g)(6)(B) of the Magnuson Fishery Conservation 
and Management Act (16 U.S.C. 1854(g)(6)(B)) is amended by striking 
``January 1, 1994'' and inserting ``April 1, 1994''.
```
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 361 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 361

  To amend the Poultry Products Inspection Act to reestablish minimum 
                  inspection and processing standards.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 5, 1993

Mr. Smith of Iowa introduced the following bill; which was referred to 
                      the Committee on Agriculture

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend the Poultry Products Inspection Act to reestablish minimum 
                  inspection and processing standards.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled, That the Poultry and 
Poultry Products Inspection Act, chapter 10 of title 21, United States 
Code, is hereby amended to add a new section as follows:
    ``All poultry and poultry products slaughtered or processed 
pursuant to the provisions of this Act shall be slaughtered and 
processed under standards which would have complied with the rules and 
regulations and all inspection and reinspection standards in effect 
July 1, 1977. Any further change in such requirements shall not be 
effective until or unless specifically approved in a Public Law.''.

                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002



In connection with
the Quarterly Report of Savvy Business Support, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June
30, 2012 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Virginia K. Sourlis,
certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best
of my knowledge and belief:



1.
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2.
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.



|Date: August 14, 2012 | By: | /s/ VIRGINIA K. SOURLIS          
|--------------------- | --- | ---------------------------------
|                      |     | Name: Virginia K. Sourlis        
|                      |     | Title: President and Director    
|                      |     | (Principal Executive Officer,    
|                      |     | Principal Financial Officer      
|                      |     | and Principal Accounting Officer)
#### Mary WRZONSKA, a/k/a Mary Wolf, Appellant, v. Chester GRUSZECZKA and Rose Marie Gruszeczka, his wife, Appellees.

No. 70-365.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Dec. 22, 1970.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                         653,916
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   38,490
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                  1,438,292
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,249,151
<PP&E>                                       1,044,824
<DEPRECIATION>                                 758,081
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,835,303
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          770,031
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        50,353
<OTHER-SE>                                  19,501,837
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,835,303
<SALES>                                      2,593,448
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,593,448
<CGS>                                          561,270
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  561,270
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             3,625,459
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (2,974,142)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (2,974,142)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (2,974,142)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.60)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.60)



</TABLE>
September 23, 2013

  
 

  
I, Joseph Riccelli, am lending Innovative Designs, Inc the amount of $55,000 Dollars, for a period of 180 days, at an interest rate of 10%. Repayment of $60,500, interest included will be made by March 23, 2014.

  
 

  	
  
/s/ Joseph Riccelli

	
  
 


	
  
Joseph Riccelli

	
  
 


	
  
 

	
  
 


	
  
/s/ Gregory P. Domian 

	
  
 


	
  
Gregory P. Domian - Witness
C,

CUNITEDSTATESENVIRONMENTALPROTECTIONAGENCYREGIONIII1650ArchStreetPhiladelphia,Pennsylvania19103-2029AR72011Mr.JohnA.Benedict,DirectorDivisionofAirQualityWestVirginiaDepartmentofEnvironmentalProtection60157thStreetSECharleston,WestVirginia24304DearMr.Benedict:OnFebruary16,2011,theU.S.EnvironmentalProtectionAgency(EPA)receivedaletterrequestingthatEPAmakeaformalfindingthatthenonattainmentareasofCharleston,WestVirginia(WV)andWeirton,WVarecurrentlyattainingthe2006fineparticulatematter(PM25)NationalAmbientAirQualityStandard(NAAQS).Alsouponmakingsuchafinding,certainapplicablerequirementsfortheseareaswouldbesuspendedpursuantto40CFR51.1004(c).EPAwillreviewtheairqualitydatafortheseareasandmakeaformaldeterminationthattheseareasareattainingthe2006PM2,5NAAQSifsupportedbytheappropriatedata.TheassignedprojectofficerwillbeMs.RuthKnappwhocanbereachedat(215)814-2191.Ifyouhaveanyquestions,pleasefeelfreetocontactmeorhaveyourstaffcontacttheprojectofficerlistedabove.Sincerely,i)ciDianaEsher,DirectorAirProtectionDivisioncc:FredDurhamCristinaFernandezCustomerServiceHotline:1-800-438-2474