alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Reginald MERCHANT.

No. 54349.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Feb. 1, 1974.

In re: Reginald Merchant applying for Supervisory and Remedial Writs.

Writ granted. The trial judge is ordered to have the testimony transcribed in compliance with Article 294 of the Louisiana Code of Criminal Procedure.
Exhibit 10.16


 


 


 


 


 


December 1, 2008


 


 


To: Harold Jacob


ID 30993089-9


 


 


Update to employment agreement with NanoVibronix


 


 


As it was agreed between us, beginning October
2008 your salary will be 10,000 sh brutto per month.


 


 


With respect,


 


 


 





	/s/ Jona Zumeris	Harold Jacob	employee name	 
	 	 	 	 
	 	/s/ Harold Jacob	employee signature	 
	Nanovibronix	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 
	(stamp)
<PAGE> 34


             SUBSIDIARIES OF DRUMMOND FINANCIAL CORPORATION


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                          Shareholding
                                 Jurisdiction          at June 30, 2000
Name of Subsidiary              of Incorporation            (Direct)
------------------              ----------------        ---------------
<S>                             <C>                     <C>

CVD Financial Corporation          Washington                  100%
CVD Financial Corporation        British Columbia              100%
Drummond Financial (B.C.) Ltd    British Columbia              100%

</TABLE>
Certification of CEO and CFO Pursuant to 
18 U.S.C. Section 1350,



As Adopted Pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Firsthand Technology Value Fund, Inc. (the “Company”) for the quarter ended September 30, 2019, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), Kevin Landis and Omar Billawala, as Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:



|(1) | The report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 134; and
|--- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                                         | 
|------------------------------------------------------------------------ | 
|Name: Kevin LandisTitle: Chief Executive OfficerDated: November 13, 2020 | 
|                                                                         | 
|Name: Omar BillawalaTitle: Financial OfficerDated: November 13, 2020     |
1 The HonorableJohn R. Jones, United States District Judge for the District of

South Dakota. 

## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 99-1653

___________ Gene Vernal Lodermeier, * * Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * District of South Dakota. Robert Dooley, Warden for the * Springfield Correctional Facility, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellee. *

___________ Submitted: October 18, 1999 Filed: October 22, 1999

___________ Before BOWMAN, BEAM, and MURPHY, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. GeneVernal Lodermeier challenges the district court's 1 denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 motion. After a review of Lodermeier's arguments and the record, we reject all of his contentions. Because we agree with the district court's well-reasoned opinion, we affirm without further discussion. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.-2-

A true copy. Attest: CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
#### Jack Julian RAGAN, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 70-601.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Jan. 19, 1971.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
# C_2014425EN.01000301.xml

| 27.11.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 425/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.11.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 425/3

---

TRANSLATION CENTRE FOR THE BODIES OF THE EUROPEAN UNION (LUXEMBOURG)

Publication of the final accounts for the financial year 2013

2014/C 425/03

The complete version of the final accounts may be found at the following address:

http://cdt.europa.eu/EN/documentation/Pages/Revenue-and-expenditure-account-and-balance-sheet.aspx

---
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 3398

To amend title 18, United States Code, to regulate the manufacture,

importation, and sale of certain particularly dangerous bullets.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

OCTOBER 28, 1993

Mr. BARRETT of Wisconsin (for himself and Mr. Schumer) introduced the

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

A BILL

To amend title 18, United States Code, to regulate the

manufacture, importation, and sale of certain particularly

dangerous bullets.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That section 921(a)(17)(B) of title 18, United States

4 Code, is amended by inserting after the first sentence the

5 following: ‘‘Such term includes any bullet that is designed

6 to expand upon impact, after being fired from a firearm,

7 resulting in the bullet having sharp, hook or barb-like pro8 jections that extend beyond the diameter of the unfired

9 bullet.’’.

Æ
Exhibit 32.2

Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as

Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

Pursuant to 18
U.S.C. § 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Digital Realty Trust, Inc. (the Company) hereby certifies, to such officers knowledge, that:

(i) the accompanying Amendment No. 1 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2012 (the
Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates and for the periods indicated.

Dated: December 21, 2012



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/    A. WILLIAM
STEIN
|A. William Stein       
|Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant to Securities and Exchange Commission Release 33-8238, dated June 5, 2003, this certification is being
furnished and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or incorporated by reference in any registration statement of the Company filed under the Securities Act of
1933, as amended.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be
retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
CERTIFICATION OFCHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICERPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 I, Alexandre Frigon, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Medora Corp. (the “Company”), hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge: (i)the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of the Company, for the period  ended April 30, 2012, and to which this certification is attached as Exhibit 32 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and(ii)the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  By:/s/Alexandre FrigonName:Alexandre FrigonTitle:Chief Executive Officer and ChiefFinancial OfficerDate:July 20, 2012 A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request. This certification accompanies the Form 10-Q to which it relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (whether made before or after the date of the Form 10-Q), irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.
#### Charles W. LEWIS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 71-806.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Nov. 30, 1972.

Charles W. Musgrove, Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Andrew I. Friedrich, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals from his conviction for receiving stolen property assigning as error the fact that, although properly and timely requested, the trial judge failed to charge the jury on the lesser included offense of *attempted*receiving of stolen property.

Since Brown v. State, Fla. 1968, 206 So.2d 377, it is clear that instructions to the jury on lesser included offenses must be given even though it is the opinion of the trial judge that the proofs clearly establish the major crime charged. See also CPR 3.510, 33 F.S.A., which requires the judge to give such instruction. An attempt, under F.S. § 776.04, F.S.A., must be classified as a lesser included offense of the crime charged if the crime charged is an offense prohibited by law. See Brown v. State, supra, at 381. Since the receipt of stolen property is prohibited by F.S. § 811.16, F.S.A., it follows that an *attempt*to receive stolen property is likewise a punishable offense. See 76 C.J.S. Receiving Stolen Goods § 12.

*693Therefore, the trial judge erred in not giving the requested instruction. Accordingly, the judgment is reversed and the cause remanded for a new trial.

REED, C. J., MAGER, J., and WEHLE, VICTOR O., Associate Judge, concur.
#### Lester Arthur HAZELL, Jr., a minor, by his next friend and parent, Lester A. Hazell, and Lester A. Hazell, individually, Appellants, v. John BATEY et al., Appellees.

No. 71-398.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Feb. 2, 1972.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 00-20818

Conference Calendar

 

ALCARIO BARRIOS, JR.,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

JOHNNY’S SPORT SHOP; MICHAEL L. GRIGAR; JEFF ARGO; R. H. 

(CURLY) WIED,

Defendants-Appellees.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. H-99-CV-2730

--------------------

June 14, 2001

Before WIENER, DeMOSS, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Alcario Barrios, Texas prisoner # 834396, appeals the

district court’s dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 suit under 28

U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(1) for failure to state a claim. Barrios had

alleged that an employee of Johnny’s Sport Shop sold Barrios a

shotgun knowing that Barrios was on felony probation and that the

employee entrapped Barrios into a felon-in-possession-of-afirearm offense. On appeal, Barrios argues that the shop’s

employee conspired with a state actor to entrap Barrios and could
No. 00-20818

-2-

thus be held liable under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, that the district

court erred when it dismissed Barrios’s complaint prematurely

without allowing him to amend his complaint or file additional

pleadings, and, liberally construed, that he cannot have his

felon-in-possession conviction invalidated because the charge is

still pending.

We review the district court’s dismissal de novo. See Ruiz

v. United States, 160 F.3d 273, 275 (5th Cir. 1998). A dismissal

of a complaint for failure to state a claim is proper when,

taking the plaintiff’s allegations as true, it appears that no

relief could be granted on the plaintiff’s alleged facts. See

Bass v. Parkwood Hosp., 180 F.3d 234, 240 (5th Cir. 1999). The

district court correctly determined that Barrios could not seek 

42 U.S.C. § 1983 relief for an allegedly illegal search and

detention on the felon-in-possession charge until that charge had

been invalidated. See Heck v. Humphrey, 512 U.S. 477, 486-87

(1994); see also Randell v. Johnson, 227 F.3d 300,300-01 (5th

Cir. 2000), petition for cert. filed, (U.S. Dec. 26, 2000)(No.

00-1054). The district court’s dismissal of Barrios’s complaint

under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A was not premature and was not error.

AFFIRMED.
June 17, 2014

JUDGMENT

The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

JAMES NEZAT, Appellant

NO. 14-13-00074-CV V.

TUCKER ENERGY SERVICES, INC., Appellee

________________________________

This cause, an appeal from the judgment in favor of appellee, Tucker Energy 

Services, Inc., signed November 11, 2012, was heard on the transcript of the 

record. We have inspected the record and find no error in the judgment. We order 

the judgment of the court below AFFIRMED.

We order appellant, James Nezat, to pay all costs incurred in this appeal. 

We further order this decision certified below for observance.
Exhibit 31.1 CERTIFICATIONS  I, Peter Klamka, President, certify that:  1.   I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of WTTJ Corp. 2.   Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report. 3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report. 4.   The registrants other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have; Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared; Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by this quarterly report (the registrants third fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and 5.   The registrants other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions); All significant deficiencies and material weakness in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.    Date:  June 14, 2011                                                                          /s/ Peter Klamka President
#### Carl Thomas PASCHAL, Jr., Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 66-911.

Third District. District Court of Appeal of Florida.

July 5, 1967.

Rehearing Denied July 19, 1967.

Myron M. Gold, Miami, for appellant.

Earl Faircloth, Atty. Gen., and Jesse J. McCrary, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

Before PEARSON, BARKDULL and HENDRY, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See: Williams v. State, Fla. App.1964, 167 So.2d 795; Taylor v. State, Fla.App.1964, 169 So.2d 861; Barton v. State, Fla.App. 1966, 182 So.2d 655.
#### UNITED STATES FIDELITY & GUARANTY CO. et al. v. N. E. NEWTON, Jr.

No. 44469.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

Oct. 16, 1967.

H. C. Mike Watkins, Meridian, for appellants.

Thomas K. Holyfield, Meridian, for ap-pellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
# C_2015010EN.01000501.xml

| 14.1.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 10/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.1.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 10/5

---

Corrigendum to European Institute for Gender Equality — Publication of the final accounts for the financial year 2013

(
  Official Journal of the European Union C 408 of 15 November 2014
  )

Official Journal of the European Union C 408 of 15 November 2014

(2015/C 10/05)

On page 10:

for:

for

‘http://www.acer.europa.eu/The_agency/Organisation/Administrative_Board/Pages/Opinions.aspx’,

read:

read

‘http://eige.europa.eu/content/document/annual-accounts-for-the-financial-year-2013’.

---
# C_2015229EN.01001202.xml

| 14.7.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 229/12 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.7.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 229/12

---

Commission notice pursuant to Article 17(5) of Regulation (EC) No 1008/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council on common rules for the operation of air services in the Community

Invitation to tender in respect of the operation of scheduled air services in accordance with public service obligations

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2015/C 229/09)

| Member State | France |
| --- | --- |
| Route concerned | Rodez (Aveyron)-Paris (Orly) |
| Period of validity of the contract | From 20 January 2016 to 19 January 2020 |
| Deadline for the submission of applications and tenders | Open procedure:
  21 September 2015, before 12.00, Paris time |
| Address from which the text of the invitation to tender and any relevant information and/or documentation relating to the public tender and the public service obligation can be obtained | Syndicat Mixte pour l’Aménagement et l’Exploitation de l’aéroport de Rodez-Aveyron |
| Hôtel du Département |
| 7 Place Charles de Gaulle |
| BP 724 |
| 12007 Rodez Cedex |
| FRANCE |
| Email: smaeroport-rodez-aveyron@orange.fr |

Member State

France

Route concerned

Rodez (Aveyron)-Paris (Orly)

Period of validity of the contract

From 20 January 2016 to 19 January 2020

Deadline for the submission of applications and tenders

Open procedure:

21 September 2015, before 12.00, Paris time

Address from which the text of the invitation to tender and any relevant information and/or documentation relating to the public tender and the public service obligation can be obtained

Syndicat Mixte pour l’Aménagement et l’Exploitation de l’aéroport de Rodez-Aveyron

Hôtel du Département

7 Place Charles de Gaulle

BP 724

12007 Rodez Cedex

FRANCE

Email: smaeroport-rodez-aveyron@orange.fr

---
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

BRIAN EHLERS
, Appellant,

v.

CARRIAGE HILLS CONDOMINIUM, INC. and THE CITY OF

HOLLYWOOD
, Appellee s

.

No. 4D 16

- 1891

[ November 8, 2017 ]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County ; Michael L. Gates , Judge; L.T. Case No. 10

- 30972 CACE (12)

.

Jonathan Mann and Robin Bresky of Law Offices of Robin Bresky, Boca Raton, for appellant.

Sharon C. Degnan of Kubicki Draper, Orlando, for app ellee Carriage

Hill s Condominium, Inc.

Laura K. Wendell and Elizabeth K. Coppolecchia of Weiss Serota Helfman Cole & Bierman, P.L., Coral Gables, for appellee The City of Hollywood.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed. See Arp v. Waterway E. A ss’n , 217 So. 3d 117 (Fla. 4th DCA 2017).

W ARNER
, L EVINE
, JJ., and B UCHANAN

, L AURIE E. , Associate Judge, concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
# C_2015099EN.01000901.xml

| 26.3.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 99/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.3.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 99/9

---

Notice to economic operators — New round of requests for the suspension of the autonomous Common Customs Tariff duties on certain industrial and agricultural products

(2015/C 99/08)

Economic operators are informed that the Commission has received requests in accordance with the administrative arrangements foreseen in the Commission communication concerning autonomous tariff suspensions and quotas (2011/C 363/02) (1) for the January round of 2016.

1

The list of the products for which a duty suspension is requested is now available on the Commission’s thematic (Europa) website on the customs union (2).

2

Economic operators are also informed that the deadline for objections against new requests to reach the Commission, via the national administrations, is 23 June 2015 which is the date of the second scheduled meeting of the Economic Tariff Questions Group.

Interested operators are advised to consult the list regularly in order to be informed on the status as the requests.

More information on the autonomous tariff suspension procedure can be found on the Europa website:

http://ec.europa.eu/taxation_customs/customs/customs_duties/tariff_aspects/suspensions/index_en.htm

---

(1)  OJ C 363, 13.12.2011, p. 6.

1

(2)  http://ec.europa.eu/taxation_customs/dds2/susp/susp_home.jsp?Lang=en

2

---
#### Ernestina SEQUEIRO, Appellant, v. NATIONAL PRESTO INDUSTRIES, INC., a foreign corporation, Appellee.

No. 70-638.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Dec. 22, 1970.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
#### Elizabeth Betty Ann WILLIAMS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 67-167.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Second District.

Feb. 23, 1968.

Edward C. Flood, Bartow, for appellant.

Earl Faircloth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and William D. Roth, Asst. Atty. Gen., Lakeland, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed upon authority of Dillen v. State, Fla.App.1967, 202 So.2d 904; Wilkins v. State, Fla.1963, 155 So.2d 129; and Goswick v. State, Fla.App.1962, 137 So.2d 863.

LILES, C. J., and PIERCE and HOB-SON, JJ., concur.