alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13-23-00120-CV

City of Pharr, Texas

v.

Raul N. Garcia and R.N. Industries L.L.C. d/b/a Pajaro Promotions

On Appeal from the

93rd District Court of Hidalgo County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. C-3425-17-B

JUDGMENT

THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on 

appeal, concludes the judgment of the trial court should be reversed and the cause 

remanded to the trial court. The Court orders the judgment of the trial court REVERSED 

and REMANDED for further proceedings consistent with its opinion. Costs of the appeal 

are adjudged against appellees.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

April 18, 2024
# C_2015256EN.01001501.xml

| 5.8.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 256/15 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.8.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 256/15

---

Corrigendum to notice from the Government of the Republic of Poland concerning Directive 94/22/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on the conditions for granting and using authorisations for the prospection, exploration and production of hydrocarbons in the ‘Czerwionka-Leszczyny’ area

(
  Official Journal of the European Union C 207 of 24 June 2015
  )

Official Journal of the European Union C 207 of 24 June 2015

(2015/C 256/13)

On page 8, the table:

for:

for:

| ‘Name | Block No | 1992 coordinate system |
| --- | --- | --- |
| X | Y |
| Czerwionka-Leszczyny | part of concession block No 390 | 258 032,74 | 478 214,46 |
| 257 600,22 | 477 475,88 |
| 257 236,65 | 476 855,03 |
| 255 820,02 | 474 279,88 |
| 255 054,37 | 472 888,08 |
| 252 191,11 | 472 884,02 |
| 250 591,73 | 473 198,17 |
| 250 559,59 | 474 517,17 |
| 252 167,24 | 475 553,57 |
| 253 255,23 | 477 826,23 |
| 255 299,03 | 479 521,25 |
| 254 975,11 | 482 628,61 |
| 256 425,31 | 480 535,09’, |

‘Name

Block No

1992 coordinate system

X

Y

Czerwionka-Leszczyny

part of concession block No 390

258 032,74

478 214,46

257 600,22

477 475,88

257 236,65

476 855,03

255 820,02

474 279,88

255 054,37

472 888,08

252 191,11

472 884,02

250 591,73

473 198,17

250 559,59

474 517,17

252 167,24

475 553,57

253 255,23

477 826,23

255 299,03

479 521,25

254 975,11

482 628,61

256 425,31

480 535,09’,

read:

read:

| ‘Name | Block No | 1992 coordinate system |
| --- | --- | --- |
| X | Y |
| Czerwionka-Leszczyny | part of concession block No 390 | 258 032,74 | 478 214,46 |
| 257 600,22 | 477 475,88 |
| 257 236,65 | 476 855,03 |
| 255 820,02 | 474 279,88 |
| 255 054,37 | 472 888,08 |
| 252 191,11 | 472 884,02 |
| 250 591,73 | 473 198,17 |
| 250 559,59 | 474 517,17 |
| 252 167,24 | 475 553,57 |
| 253 255,23 | 477 826,23 |
| 255 229,03 | 479 521,25 |
| 254 975,11 | 482 628,61 |
| 256 425,31 | 480 535,09’. |

‘Name

Block No

1992 coordinate system

X

Y

Czerwionka-Leszczyny

part of concession block No 390

258 032,74

478 214,46

257 600,22

477 475,88

257 236,65

476 855,03

255 820,02

474 279,88

255 054,37

472 888,08

252 191,11

472 884,02

250 591,73

473 198,17

250 559,59

474 517,17

252 167,24

475 553,57

253 255,23

477 826,23

255 229,03

479 521,25

254 975,11

482 628,61

256 425,31

480 535,09’.

---
Exhibit 32.1  Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350  In connection with the Quarterly Report of On the Move Systems Corp. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended May 31, 2013 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Patrick Brown, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, to my knowledge that:  (i)   the accompanying Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Act”); and  (ii)   the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  /s/ Patrick Brown Patrick Brown President, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, Principal Accounting Officer, Secretary, Treasurer and Director  Date:   July 22, 2013
#### John Button, Respondent *vs.*Hannibal and St. Joseph Railroad Co., Appellant.

1. *Justice's Court*— Appeal—Security *for Costs*— Non-residence.—On appeal from a justice, appellant asked that respondent be ruled to give security for costs, on the ground that he had, pending the appeal, become'a non-resident Rule not granted. (Wag. Stat. 842, 343.)

*Appeal from Shelby Circuit Court.*

Carr, for Appellant.

*C. S. Brown & J. T. Smith,*for Respondent.

Adams, Judge,

delivered the opinion of the court.

The plaintiff sued the defendant before a justice of the peace.

The complaint was that the defendant had killed plaintiff’s milch cow, worth forty dollars.

The plaintiff had a judgment before the justice, from which the defendant appealed to the Circuit Court. The defendant filed a motion in the Circuit Court to rule the plaintiff to give security for costs, upon the ground that since the judgment before the justice the plaintiff had become a non-resident of the State. This motion was overruled, and this action of the court is assigned for error. This point is settled in favor of the plaintiff by the 3d section of chapter 173 General Statutes, page 687, which reads that “ On an appeal from a justice’s court if the plaintiff be appellee he shall not be required to give security for costs.”

After the case had been transferred to the circuit court, the plaintiff was allowed to amend his statement, specifically charging the defendant with negligence in killing his cow. The substance of the charge before the justice was precisely the same thing. The cause of action in the justice’s court was essentially the same as the one tried in the Circuit Court. The amendment did not set up a new or different cause of action. I see no error in the record.

Let the judgment be affirmed.

The other judges concur.
EXHIBIT 32.1





CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER





PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)





In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2018 (the “Report”) of New Mountain Finance Corporation (the “Registrant”), as filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Robert A. Hamwee, the Chief Executive Officer of the Registrant, hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge, that:





|    |                                                                                                                                  
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

|    |                                                                                                                                                        
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.




/s/ ROBERT A. HAMWEEName:Robert A. HamweeDate:August 7, 2018
EXHIBIT 32








SHANG HIDE CONSULTANTS, LTD.




CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES -OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Shang Hide Consultants, Ltd. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Marty Weigel the Principal Executive and Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 (including subsections (a) (b) and (c) thereof), as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and


(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








Date: August 22, 2011
By:
/s/ Marty WeigelMarty WeigelPrincipal Executive and Financial Officer
#### John EKBERG, Carousel Cocktail Lounge and Restaurant, Inc., Buchtan, Inc. and Uptown Corporation, Appellants, v. Dmitri A. BAKEEFF, a/k/a Andy Bakeeff, Appellee.

No. 68-156.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Third District.

Aug. 13, 1968.

Klein, Tannenbaum & McGovern, Miami, for appellants.

Walton, Lantaff, Schroeder, Carson & Wahl, Miami, for appellee.

Before PEARSON, HENDRY and SWANN, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

This appeal is from a final judgment wherein the trial judge sitting without a jury found that the plaintiff below, Ba-keff, had been defrauded by the defendant. The final judgment set aside a release executed by the plaintiff because it was procured through fraud and entered a money judgment for the amount found to be due the plaintiff from the defendant.

The case was submitted for determination by the trial judge in accordance with *278a stipulation between the parties under which they submitted various depositions and exhibits to him without the necessity of an actual trial.

On appeal the main thrust of the appellants is directed to the sufficiency of the evidence. Examination of the record and briefs on appeal reveals that there is sufficient, competent evidence to support the findings and conclusions of the trial court judge.

The final judgment herein appealed be and the same is, therefore,

Affirmed.
No. 00-7332.

#### Landa Tapia *v.*California.

Ct. App. Cal., 5th App. Dist. Certiorari denied.
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS OF AEARO CORPORATION AS OF JUNE 30, 1999
(UNAUDITED) AND SEPTEMBER 30, 1998 AND THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF
OPERATIONS (UNAUDITED) FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 1999 AND 1998
CONTAINED IN AEARO CORPORATION'S 1OQ FOR THE QUARTER ENDED JUNE 30, 1999 AND
IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FORM 10Q
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> US DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>
<CASH>                                           5,020
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   43,984
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     31,154
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                83,974
<PP&E>                                          89,407
<DEPRECIATION>                                  34,824
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 271,726
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           61,778
<BONDS>                                        199,747
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             1
<OTHER-SE>                                       6,010
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   271,726
<SALES>                                         75,384
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                75,384
<CGS>                                           40,363
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   40,363
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                24,802
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               5,974
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  4,245
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,041
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              3,204
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     3,204
<EPS-BASIC>                                       8.70
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     8.70


</TABLE>
254 La. 800

#### Hollis E. MOORE and Clellie Balton Moore v. CENTRAL LOUISIANA ELECTRIC COMPANY, Inc., et al.

No. 50167.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Oct. 14, 1969.

In re: Hollis E. Moore and Ciellie Bal-ton Moore applying for writs of certiorari, mandamus and prohibition.

Application denied. This Court will not exercise its supervisory jurisdiction to review interlocutory orders or rulings of a trial court, save in cases of palpable error and only when irreparable injury will ensue. Relator has an adequate remedy by appeal in the event of an adverse judgment on the merits.
#### STATE of Louisiana ex rel. Joseph VERNON, Jr. v. C. Murray HENDERSON, Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary.

No. 54109.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Dec. 19, 1973.

In re: Joseph Vernon, Jr., applying for writ of habeas corpus.

Writ refused. No error.
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 3074

To extend the emergency unemployment compensation program.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

SEPTEMBER 14, 1993

Mr. RANGEL introduced the following bill; which was referred jointly to the

Committees on Ways and Means and Energy and Commerce

A BILL

To extend the emergency unemployment compensation

program.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Emergency Unemploy5 ment Compensation Program Extension Act of 1993’’.

6 SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF EMERGENCY UNEMPLOYMENT COM7 PENSATION PROGRAM.

8

9 (a) GENERAL RULE.—Sections 102(f)(1) and

10 106(a)(2) of the Emergency Unemployment Compensation

11 Act of 1991 (Public Law 102–164, as amended) are each
2

•HR 3074 IH

1 amended by striking ‘‘October 2, 1993’’ and inserting

2 ‘‘June 30, 1994’’.

3 (b) MODIFICATION TO FINAL PHASE-OUT.—Para4 graph (2) of section 102(f) of such Act is amended—

5 (1) by striking ‘‘October 2, 1993’’ and inserting

6 ‘‘June 30, 1994’’, and

7 (2) by striking ‘‘January 15, 1994’’ and insert8 ing ‘‘August 15, 1994’’.

9 (c) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—Paragraph (1) of

10 section 101(e) of such Act is amended by striking

11 ‘‘October 2, 1993’’ each place it appears and inserting

12 ‘‘June 30, 1994’’.

13 (d) NONREPAYABLE TRANSFERS TO EXTENDED AC14 COUNT.—Paragraphs (1) and (2) of section 104(e) of such

15 Act are each amended by inserting after ‘‘Amendments of

16 1992’’ the following: ‘‘or by reason of the amendments

17 made by section 2 of the Emergency Unemployment Com18 pensation Program Extension Act of 1993’’.

19 (e) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by

20 this section shall apply to weeks beginning after Octo21 ber 2, 1993.

22 SEC. 3. TREATMENT OF RAILROAD WORKERS.

23 (a) EXTENSION OF PROGRAM.—

24 (1) IN GENERAL.—Paragraphs (1) and (2) of

25 section 501(b) of the Emergency Unemployment
3

•HR 3074 IH

1 Compensation Act of 1991 (Public Law 102–164, as

2 amended) are each amended by striking ‘‘October 2,

3 1993’’ and inserting ‘‘June 30, 1994’’.

4 (2) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—Section

5 501(a) of such Act is amended by striking ‘‘October

6 1993’’ and inserting ‘‘June 1994’’.

7 (b) TERMINATION OF BENEFITS.—Section 501(e) of

8 such Act is amended—

9 (1) by striking ‘‘October 2, 1993’’ and inserting

10 ‘‘June 30, 1994’’, and

11 (2) by striking ‘‘January 15, 1994’’ and insert12 ing ‘‘August 15, 1994’’.

13 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by

14 this section shall apply to weeks beginning after October

15 2, 1993.

Æ
# C_2015033EN.01000301.xml

| 31.1.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 33/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

31.1.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 33/3

---

Information communicated by Member States regarding closure of fisheries

(2015/C 33/03)

In accordance with Article 35(3) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1224/2009 of 20 November 2009 establishing a Community control system for ensuring compliance with the rules of the common fisheries policy (1), a decision has been taken to close the fishery as set down in the following table:

1

| Date and time of closure | 20.12.2014 |
| --- | --- |
| Duration | 20.12.2014-31.12.2014 |
| Member State | Germany |
| Stock or Group of stocks | COD/N1GL14 |
| Species | Cod (Gadus Morhua) |
| Zone | Greenland waters of NAFO 1 and Greenland waters of XIV |
| Type(s) of fishing vessels | — |
| Reference number | 88/TQ43 |

Date and time of closure

20.12.2014

Duration

20.12.2014-31.12.2014

Member State

Germany

Stock or Group of stocks

COD/N1GL14

Species

Cod (Gadus Morhua)

Gadus Morhua

Zone

Greenland waters of NAFO 1 and Greenland waters of XIV

Type(s) of fishing vessels

—

Reference number

88/TQ43

---

(1)  OJ L 343, 22.12.2009, p. 1.

1

---
#### Judith A. EDLER, wife, Appellant, v. Paul J. EDLER, husband, Appellee.

No. 73-297.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

July 18, 1973.

Rehearing Denied Sept. 6, 1973.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Broward County; Otis Farrington, Judge.

Appeal dismissed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>  5
<LEGEND>   This schedule contains summary financial information extracted
           from the Condensed Statement of Operations, the Condensed
           Balance Sheet and the accompanying Notes To The Condensed
           Financial Statements included in the Company's Form 10-K for
           the year ended December 31, 1997 and is qualified in its
           entirety by reference to such.

</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                 1,000

<S>                                       <C>
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                         Dec-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                            Jan-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                              Dec-31-1997
<PERIOD-TYPE>                             12-MOS
<CASH>                                       2,928
<SECURITIES>                                     0
<RECEIVABLES>                                3,359
<ALLOWANCES>                                  (263)
<INVENTORY>                                  2,337
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             9,118
<PP&E>                                      57,201
<DEPRECIATION>                             (11,074)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              55,482
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       14,995
<BONDS>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            0
<PREFERRED>                                      0
<COMMON>                                    40,290
<OTHER-SE>                                 (14,052)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                55,482
<SALES>                                     19,744
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            19,744
<CGS>                                       24,089
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               24,089
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             9,443
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           2,185
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (15,002)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (15,002)
<DISCONTINUED>                                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  0
<CHANGES>                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                               (15,002)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                               ($1.08)
<EPS-DILUTED>                               ($1.08)


</TABLE>
#### Donald S. ZUCKERMAN et al., Appellants, v. LUMIDOR INDUSTRIES, INC., et al., Appellees.

No. 71-942.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Oct. 1, 1971.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

May 27, 2014

d0519 

# Order

Clerk May 27, 2014

146329

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 146329

COA: 305671

Wayne CC: 10

- 007585

- FH

JERARD DUNN,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

By order of April 29, 2013, the application for leave to appeal the November 20,

2012 judgment of the Court of Appeals was held in abeyance pending the decision in

People v Earl (Docket No. 145677). On order of the Court, the case having been decided

on March 26, 2014, 495 Mich 33 (2014), the application is again considered, and it is

DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented should be revi ewed

by this Court.
#### Earl L. DENHAM, Appellant, v. Vertis G. RAMSAY, Circuit Clerk, Appellee.

No. 47018.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

May 22, 1972.

Hurlbert & O’Barr, Biloxi, for appellant.

Appellee did not file brief.

PER CURIAM.

No opinion. Reversed and mandamus ordered.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 S.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Palm Harbor Homes, Inc. (the Company) on Form
10-K for the year ended March 28, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Larry H. Keener, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as
adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C.78m or 78o(d); and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|    |  |                                                                  
|--- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------
|    | 
|By: |  | /s/    LARRY H. KEENER                                           
|    |  | Larry H. Keener Chairman and Chief Executive Officer June 3, 2008