alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Net 1 UEPS Technologies, Inc.: Exhibit 10.29 - Filed by newsfilecorp.com






Exhibit 10.29 

ADDENDUM TO THE RELATIONSHIP AGREEMENT


between 

NET 1 UEPS TECHNOLOGIES, INC 

and 

NET1 APPLIED TECHNOLOGIES SOUTH AFRICA (PROPRIETARY) LIMITED


and 

BORN FREE INVESTMENTS 272 (PROPRIETARY) LIMITED 

and 

MAZWI YAKO





	1   PARTIES
	 	 	 
	1.1 	
      The Parties to this addendum are –

	 	 	 
	1.1.1 	 	
      Net 1 UEPS Technologies, Inc., a Florida
    corporation;

	 	 	 
	1.1.2 	 	
      Net 1 Applied Technologies South Africa (Proprietary)
      Limited

	 	 	 
	1.1.3 	 	
      Born Free Investments 272 (Proprietary)
Limited;

	 	 	 
	1.1.4 	 	
      Mazwi Yako; and

	 	 	 
	1.2 	
      The Parties agree as set out
below.





2   INTERPRETATION 

In this addendum - 

	2.1 	
      words and expressions defined in the Agreement, shall,
      unless otherwise indicated by the context, bear the same meaning in the
      Addendum;

	 	 
	2.2 	
      "Agreement" means the relationship agreement
      entered into between the Parties on or about 9 December 2013;
and

	 	 
	2.3 	
      "Parties" means the parties to this
    addendum.





3   VARIATION OF AGREEMENT 

The Agreement is hereby amended as follows: 

	3.1 	
      By substituting the date “31st day of January 2014”, in
      clause 4.1, with “15th day of March 2014”.







4   SAVINGS CLAUSE 

	4.1 	
      Save to the extent specifically modified in this
      Addendum, or unless otherwise agreed in writing between the Parties, all
      the terms and conditions of the Agreements shall mutatis mutandis
      continue to apply.

	 	 
	 
	5   COSTS
	 	 
		
      Each Party will bear and pay its own legal costs and
      expenses of and incidental to the negotiation, drafting, preparation and
      implementation of this Addendum.

	 	 
	 
	6   SIGNATURE
	 	 
		
      Signed on behalf of the Parties, each signatory hereto
      warranting that he/she has due authority to do so.



SIGNED at ROSEBANK on JANUARY 31, 2014 

	 	For and on behalf of 
	 	NET 1 UEPS TECHNOLOGIES, INC. 
	 	  
	 	  
	 	  
	 	/s/
      Serge Belamant 
	 	Signature 
	 	   
	 	Serge
      C.P. Belamant 
	 	Name of Signatory 
	 	   
	 	Chief
      Executive Officer 
	 	Designation of Signatory







SIGNED at ROSEBANK on JANUARY 31, 2014 

	 	For and on behalf of 
		NET1 APPLIED TECHNOLOGIES SOUTH
      AFRICA (PROPRIETARY) LIMITED 
	 	  
	 	  
	 	  
	 	/s/
      Serge Belamant 
	 	Signature 
	 	   
	 	Serge
      C.P. Belamant 
	 	Name of Signatory 
	 	   
	 	Director 
	 	Designation of Signatory 


SIGNED at ROSEBANK on JANUARY 31, 2014 

	 	For and on behalf of 
		BORN FREE INVESTMENTS 272
      (PROPRIETARY) LIMITED 
	 	  
	 	  
	 	  
	 	/s/
      Mazwi Yako 
	 	Signature 
	 	   
	 	Mazwi
      Yako 
	 	Name of Signatory 
	 	   
	 	Director 
	 	Designation of Signatory







SIGNED at ROSEBANK on JANUARY 31, 2014 

	 	For and on behalf of 
	 	MAZWI YAKO 
	 	  
	 	  
	 	  
	 	/s/
      Mazwi Yako 
	 	Signature 
	 	   
	 	Mazwi
      Yako 
	 	Name of Signatory 
	 	  
	 	 
	 	Designation of Signatory
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 297 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 297

     To permit States in certain cases to waive application of the 
 requirements of the Commercial Motor Vehicle Safety Act of 1986 with 
    respect to a vehicle which is being operated for the purpose of 
  removing snow or ice from a roadway by plowing, sanding, or salting.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 5, 1993

  Mr. Petri introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
              Committee on Public Works and Transportation

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
     To permit States in certain cases to waive application of the 
 requirements of the Commercial Motor Vehicle Safety Act of 1986 with 
    respect to a vehicle which is being operated for the purpose of 
  removing snow or ice from a roadway by plowing, sanding, or salting.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. APPLICATION OF COMMERCIAL MOTOR VEHICLE REQUIREMENTS TO 
              VEHICLES USED FOR SNOW OR ICE REMOVAL.

    (a) State Waiver Authority.--Subject to subsection (b), a State may 
waive application of the requirements of the Commercial Motor Vehicle 
Safety Act of 1986 (49 U.S.C. 2701 note) with respect to a vehicle 
which is being operated within the boundaries of an eligible unit of 
local government by an employee of such unit for the purpose of 
removing snow or ice from a roadway by plowing, sanding, or salting.
    (b) Limitation.--The waiver authority contained in subsection (a) 
shall only apply in a case in which the employee described in 
subsection (a) is needed to operate the vehicle because the employee of 
the eligible unit of local government who ordinarily operates the 
vehicle and has a commercial driver's license is temporarily 
unavailable or is in need of additional assistance due to a snow 
emergency.
    (c) Eligible Unit of Local Government Defined.--For the purposes of 
this section, the term ``eligible unit of local government'' means a 
city, town, borough, county, parish, district, or other public body 
created by or pursuant to State law which has a total population of 
3,000 individuals or less.

                                 <all>
```
#### STATE of Louisiana ex rel. Johnny A. WIMBERLY v. C. Murray HENDERSON, Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary.

No. 54284.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Feb. 1, 1974.

In re: Johnny A. Wimberly applying for writ of certiorari and writ of habeas corpus.

Writ denied. The relator does not make factual allegations of prejudicial error under a legal or constitutional right. The colloquy at arraignment negates the need for an evidentiary hearing under these allegations.
#### Reginald G. JACKSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 67-108.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Second District.

Oct. 25, 1967.

Rehearing Denied Nov. 14, 1967.

Robert E. Jagger, Public Defender, and Carleton L. Weidemeyer, Asst. Public Defender, Clearwater, for appellant.

*336Earl Faircloth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and William D. Roth, Asst. Atty. Gen., Lakeland, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed upon authority of Hanks v. State, Fla.App. 1967, 195 So.2d 49; Lindsey v. State, Fla.App.1966, 184 So.2d 437; Moore v. State, Fla.App.1965, 181 So.2d 164, and State v. Coyle, Fla.App.1966, 181 So.2d 671.

LILES, C. J., and SHANNON and PIERCE, JJ., concur.
NO. 07-02-0079-CV

	IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

	FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

	AT AMARILLO

	PANEL E

	OCTOBER 4, 2002

	______________________________

	IN THE MATTER OF THE MARRIAGE OF

	PAUL ALONZO AND PAT H. ALONZO

	_________________________________

	FROM THE 108TH DISTRICT COURT OF POTTER COUNTY;

	NO. 63,585-E; HONORABLE ABE LOPEZ, JUDGE

	_______________________________

Before JOHNSON and REAVIS, JJ., and BOYD, SJ.*

	Appellant Pat H. Alonzo seeks to appeal from a final decree of divorce rendered by the 108th District Court.  The case was heard January 24, 2002.  She filed her pro se notice of appeal on January 29th, although the final decree was not signed until April 26, 2002.  The clerk’s record was filed May 22, 2002.  This made the reporter’s record due June 25, 2002.  Tex. R. App. P. 35.1.  No record or brief was received.  In fulfillment of the duty this court shares with the trial court reporter for filing the record, Tex. R. App. P. 35.3, the court clerk contacted the official court reporter to determine the status of the record.  The reporter advised the court that she had not received a request to prepare a reporter’s record or payment for preparation of a record.  The court clerk informed appellant of this by letter dated May 30, 2002, and advised her that if we did not receive proof of her request for a reporter’s record within 10 days, we would consider those issues which do not require a reporter’s record.  Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(c).  No response was filed, nor has appellant filed a brief or motion for extension of time to file a brief.  The limited record before us presents nothing for us to review.  

	We therefore dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution.  Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a)(1).

							Per Curiam

Do not publish.
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 288 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 288

To amend title 5, United States Code, to grant to the widow or widower 
  of a Federal employee or annuitant whose health insurance coverage 
  would otherwise terminate because of such employee's or annuitant's 
death the right to elect the same temporary extension of coverage as is 
                  available to certain former spouses.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 5, 1993

 Mrs. Morella introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
               Committee on Post Office and Civil Service

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend title 5, United States Code, to grant to the widow or widower 
  of a Federal employee or annuitant whose health insurance coverage 
  would otherwise terminate because of such employee's or annuitant's 
death the right to elect the same temporary extension of coverage as is 
                  available to certain former spouses.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled, That (a) section 
8905a(f) of title 5, United States Code, is amended--
            (1) in paragraph (1)--
                    (A) by striking ``and'' at the end of subparagraph 
                (A);
                    (B) by striking the period at the end of 
                subparagraph (B) and inserting ``; and''; and
                    (C) by adding at the end the following:
            ``(C) to any individual whose coverage as the spouse of an 
        employee or former employee would otherwise terminate (without 
        any right to continue coverage under section 8905(b)(2)) as a 
        result of the employee's or former employee's death.'';
            (2) in paragraph (2)(C) by striking ``or legal 
        separation,'' and inserting ``legal separation, or spouse's 
        death,''; and
            (3) in paragraph (3)--
                    (A) in subparagraph (A)--
                            (i) by inserting ``, or the death of,'' 
                        after ``legal separation from''; and
                            (ii) by striking ``or legal separation (as 
                        the case may be)'' and inserting ``legal 
                        separation, or death (as the case may be)''; 
                        and
                    (B) in subparagraph (B) by striking ``or legal 
                separation'' and inserting ``legal separation, or 
                spouse's death''.
    (b) The amendments made by subsection (a) shall take effect as of 
the date of the enactment of this Act, but shall not apply with respect 
to any individual seeking to continue coverage as the survivor of an 
employee or former employee who died before such effective date.

                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 10.22

 

EXHIBIT A

 

INVESTOR RIGHTS AGREEMENT JOINGER

 

By execution of this Investor Rights Agreement Joinder, the undersigned agrees  to become a party to that certain  Investor Rights Agreement, dated as of               , 201    , as may be amended, among Dipexium Pharmaceuticals, LLC, a limited liability company under the laws of the State of Delaware and the parties named therein.  The undersigned shall have all the rights, and shall observe all the obligations, applicable to a Purchaser under such Agreement.

 

	
 
    	
Purchaser:
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
Name:
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
By:
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
Name:
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
Title:
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
Date:
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
Address   for notices:
#### Nelson Eddie McGRIFF, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 71-747.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

March 21, 1972.

Bruce E. Telander, Miami, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., and Joseph R. DeLucca, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

Before PEARSON, CHARLES CARROLL and HENDRY, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from an order entered by the Criminal Court of Record for Dade County, Florida, denying defendant’s motion for relief from his conviction of robbery, pursuant to Rule 3.8S0, CrPR, 33 F.S.A., formerly Rule 1.850. The court in its order held that the allegations of the motion for relief did not constitute legal grounds for granting a new trial or release of the defendant.

Related requests for post-conviction relief sought by the appellant are: McGriff v. State, Fla.App.1971, 248 So.2d 563 and McGriff v. Wainwright, 431 F.2d 897 (5th Cir. 1970).

We have carefully reviewed the record and briefs of counsel and have concluded that the court properly denied the defendant the relief sought. It appears that the matters raised in the motion, if proved, would not constitute legal grounds for collateral attack of the judgment and sentence. The matters complained of could or should have been raised on direct appeal. Peterson v. State, Fla.App.1970, 237 So.2d 223.

For the reasons stated the order appealed is affirmed.

Affirmed.
EX-10.2



 Exhibit 10.2 

2014 Target Bonuses 
  

					
	 Executive Officer
	  	Target Bonus (as
percent of 2014 Base
Salary)	 
	 David Hung, M.D.

        President and Chief Executive Officer
	  	 	100	%
	 Cheryl Cohen

        Chief Commercial Officer
	  	 	60	%
	 C. Patrick Machado

        Chief Business Officer and Chief Financial Officer
	  	 	60	%
	 Lynn Seely, M.D.

        Chief Medical Officer
	  	 	60	%
#### STATE of Florida, State Road Department of Florida, an Agency of the State of Florida, Petitioners, v. Michael D. WARD, Daniel B. Curtis, Marguerite Curtis, Elizabeth B. Kral, Francis P. Marley, Betty E. Larue, George F. Larue, Hampton M. Powers, Dorothy W. Powers, Respondents.

No. 70-275.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Oct. 2, 1970.

Rehearing Denied Oct. 22, 1970.

Howard Hadley, Gen. Counsel, and Geoffrey B. Dobson, Asst. Atty., Tallahassee, for petitioners.

William C. McLean, Jr., of McLean, McLean & Vogt, Tampa, for respondents.

*611PER CURIAM.

Certiorari denied. Lee Leithauser v. Harrison, Fla.App.1964, 168 So.2d 95.

LILES, A. C. J., and MANN' and Mc-NULTY, JJ., concur.
#### Raymond L. NEWTON and Germaine C. Newton, Petitioners, v. The STATE of Florida, Respondent.

No. 43411.

Supreme Court of Florida.

May 16, 1973.

Rehearing Denied June 19, 1973.

Certiorari denied. 272 So.2d 15.

ERVIN, Acting C. J., and ADKINS, BOYD, McCAIN and DEKLE, JJ., concur.
Figure 1. Percent of adults 25-34 who are the 

child of the householder: 1983-2011

0 

5 

10 

15 

20 

25 

1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 2011

MEN

WOMEN

-0.8%

2010-2011

No significant 

change

Recession Change following recession*

Changes in percentage points

Source: U.S. Census Bureau, Current Population Survey, 1983 to 2011 Annual Social and Economic Supplements. 

NOTE: In CPS data, unmarried college students living in dormitories are counted as living in their parent(s) home.

* Values for the year following a recession are not significantly different from the prior year.

+2.2%

2010-2011

Significant 

change
Figure 2. Percent of adults 18-24 who are the 

child of the householder: 1983-2011

Source: U.S. Census Bureau, Current Population Survey, 1983 to 2011 Annual Social and Economic Supplements. 

NOTE: In CPS data, unmarried college students living in dormitories are counted as living in their parent(s) home.

40 

45 

50 

55 

60 

65 

1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 2011

MEN

WOMEN

+1.0%

2010-2011

No significant 

change

+1.5%

2010-2011

No significant 

change

Recession Change following recession*

Changes in percentage points

* Values for the year following a recession are not significantly different from the prior year.
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, Current Population Survey, 1970, 1980, 1990, 1995, 2000, 2005, 2011 

Annual Social and Economic Supplements.

Figure 3. Households by Type: 1970 to 2011

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

1970 1980 1990 1995 2000 2005 2011

Other nonfamily 

households

Women living alone

Men living alone

Other family 

households

Married couples 

without children

Married couples with 

children
Figure 4. Percent of households with one 

person: 1960-2011

Source: U.S. Census Bureau, Current Population Survey, 1960 to 2011 Annual Social and Economic 

Supplements. 

10 

12 

14 

16 

18 

20 

22 

24 

26 

28 

30 

1960 1965 1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 2011

+0.6%

+1.0%

Recession Change following recession*

Changes in percentage points

*Changes after recessions where values are not shown on the graph were not a significant 

change from the first full year following the recession to the year prior.

+0.9%

2010-2011

Significant 

difference
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 162 (Tuesday, August 21, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Pages 42298-42299]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-17974]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Formations of, Acquisitions by, and Mergers of Bank Holding 
Companies

    The companies listed in this notice have applied to the Board for 
approval, pursuant to the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 (12 U.S.C. 
1841 et seq.) (BHC Act), Regulation Y (12 CFR part 225), and all other 
applicable statutes and regulations to become a bank holding company 
and/or to acquire the assets or the ownership of, control of, or the 
power to vote shares of a bank or bank holding company and all of the 
banks and nonbanking companies owned by the bank holding company, 
including the companies listed below.
    The applications listed below, as well as other related filings 
required by the Board, are available for immediate inspection at the 
Federal Reserve Bank indicated. The applications will also be available 
for inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested 
persons may express their views in writing on the standards enumerated 
in the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1842(c)). If the proposal also involves the 
acquisition of a nonbanking company, the review also includes whether 
the acquisition of the nonbanking company complies with the standards 
in section 4 of the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1843). Unless otherwise noted, 
nonbanking activities will be conducted throughout the United States.
    Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding each of these 
applications must be received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the 
offices of the Board of Governors not later than September 18, 2018.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas (Robert L. Triplett III, Senior 
Vice President) 2200 North Pearl Street, Dallas, Texas 75201-2272:
    1. Woodforest Financial Group Employee Stock Ownership Plan, The 
Woodlands, Texas; and Woodforest Financial Group Employee Stock 
Ownership Trust, Spring, Texas; to acquire up to an additional 28 
percent

[[Page 42299]]

of Woodforest Financial Group, Inc., The Woodlands, Texas, and thereby 
indirectly acquire Woodforest National Bank, Houston, Texas.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, August 16, 
2018.
Ann Misback,
Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 2018-17974 Filed 8-20-18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
#### RYDER TRUCK RENTAL, INC., a Florida corporation, et al., Petitioners, v. Flora E. PRITCHARD, as the Guardian of Albert Dascenzo, Respondents.

No. 73-82.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

March 7, 1973.

Certiorari denied without opinion.
**Exhibit 32.2**

**Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

In connection with the annual report of FelCor Lodging Trust Incorporated (the “Registrant”) on Form 10-K for the three months and year ended December 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report), the undersigned hereby certifies, in the capacity as indicated below and pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to            § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|   | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and |
|--------|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Registrant. |
|--------|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

| February 27, 2009 | /s/Andrew J. Welch      |        |
|------------------------|-------------------------|--------|
|                   | Andrew J. Welch         |
|                   | Chief Financial Officer |   |
EXHIBIT 32.1  CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Quarterly Report of Vantage Health (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended December 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Lisa Ramakrishnan, Chief Executive and Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.   Date: May 15, 2011 /s/ Lisa Ramakrishnan Lisa Ramakrishnan President, Chief Executive Officer, and Chief Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 32.1





CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER





PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)





In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2022 (the “Report”) of New Mountain Finance Corporation (the “Registrant”), as filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Robert A. Hamwee, the Chief Executive Officer of the Registrant, hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge, that:





(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and


(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.





/s/ ROBERT A. HAMWEEName:Robert A. HamweeDate:May 9, 2022