alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

R.J.A.,

Respondent

v.

THE ROMAN CATHOLIC DIOCESE OF 

PITTSBURGH, BISHOP DAVID A. ZUBIK 

AND CARDINAL DONALD WUERL,

Petitioners

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 78 WM 2020

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 18th day of November, 2020, the Application “for Extraordinary 

Relief and Stay Pending Outcome of Dispositive Appeal” is DENIED.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, Respondent

v. FREDDIE CLEVELAND, Petitioner : : : : : : : : : : : No. 81 MAL 2015 Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER PER CURIAM AND NOW , this 10th day of June, 2015, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is DENIED
.
#### Samuel WILCHER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 72-220.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

May 23, 1973.

Walter R. Talley, Public Defender, Bradenton, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and David Luther Woodward, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellee.

*563PER CURIAM.

While this appeal was pending in this court, the Supreme Court of Florida rendered its opinion in Mancini v. State, Fla. 1973, 273 So.2d 371, receding from the limitation in State v. Wright, Fla. 1969, 224 So.2d 300, and State v. Owens, Fla.1970, 233 So.2d 389.

In light of Mancini, supra, we have thereupon carefully examined the entire record on file here on behalf of appellant Wilcher, considered the sufficiency of the evidence, and find nothing to justify a reversal of the judgment appealed. Accordingly, the judgment is thereupon

Affirmed.

HOBSON, A. C. J., McNULTY, J., and PIERCE, J. (Ret.), concur.
#### Walsh, Appellant, *v.*Keystone State Construction Company et al.

Argued October 3, 1934.

Before Trexler, P. J., Keller, Cunningham, Baldrige, Stadteeld, Parker and James, JJ.

*Frank J. Eustace, Jr.,*for appellant.

*Frank B. Ambler,*for appellee.

*438December 18, 1934:

Per Curiam,

On July 23, 1931, the appellant by reason of a fall due to the collapse of a scaffold sustained an injury to his lower left leg which caused the blood to collect beneath the skin and required incision and drainage. A compensation agreement was executed between him and his employer and its insurance carrier. On March 8, 1932, the defendant filed a petition to terminate upon the ground of recovery claiming that although some disability of the injured leg persisted, it was entirely due to varicose veins which had existed prior to the accident. This petition was dismissed and the board on .appeal sustained the referee. From the board’s decision no appeal was taken. On December 21, 1932, defendant filed a second petition to terminate. There was medical testimony showing that whatever disability persisted at the time of this hearing was wholly due to varicose veins. The board and the lower court joined in the action of the referee in terminating the compensation. Claimant has appealed. The argument of the appellant is that since the disability on March 8, 1932, was found to be due to the accident and not to varicose veins and there being no appeal from that decision that the matter in controversy was then decided and could not be reopened by the employer unless there is shown a change in claimant’s condition. It is true that the defendants could not open the case so as to show that at the time of the former hearing the injury did not cause the disability. The board could not reverse the finding. The right to compensation on that date was settled. See Roeschen v. Dietrich et al., 107 Pa. Superior Ct. 298, 163 A. 63. That, however, did not close the door to subsequent inquiry. What was his condition December 21, 1932? Physicians were called and examined and testified. Eight (8) months had elapsed since the former examination. Section 413 of the Workmen’s Compensation Act of *439April 13, 1927, P. L. 186, 77 PS Sec. 772 provides, inter alia, that a petition to terminate may be presented at any time. Several of the doctors testified at the last hearing that the disability consequent to the accident had ceased. This of necessity implied that there had been a change in claimant’s condition. The referee adopted their conclusion. The board and the court below sustained it, and compensation was terminated. It is no answer to their last finding to say that some time before the disability due to the accident had existed. As stated, the inquiry was whether it still existed. The referee and the board are designated by law as those to whom the finding of facts is delegated, and we may not disturb such findings if they are supported by competent testimony.

There was sufficient evidence to support the conclusion reached by them.

The order of the court below dismissing claimant’s appeal and entering judgment for the defendant is affirmed.
General Energy Efficiency Utility Information

The Public Service Board ("Board") oversees Vermont's Energy Efficiency Utility Program ("EEU Program"). This program 

provides energy efficiency services to residential and business electricity and heating-and-process-fuel consumers 

throughout Vermont. These services help consumers invest now in energy efficiency measures that will save Vermonters 

money throughout the lifetime of the efficient products (an average of approximately 11 years).

The Board has appointed two entities to provide energy efficiency services --- Efficiency Vermont and the City of Burlington 

Electric Department ("BED") -- and is considering whether to appoint an entity to deliver natural gas energy efficiency 

services. Since 2000, Efficiency Vermont has been providing technical advice, financial assistance, and design guidance to 

help make Vermont's homes, farms, and businesses more efficient. For more information about the services offered by 

Efficiency Vermont, and about energy efficiency in general, see Efficiency Vermont's website: www.efficiencyvermont.org or 

call Efficiency Vermont at 888-921-5990. BED provides many of these energy efficiency services in its service territory. If you

are a customer of BED, please contact BED directly at 802-865-7300 for information about energy efficiency services 

available to you.

For more information about Vermont's Energy Efficiency Utility Program, click on the links below.

Public Service Board

State of Vermont

• Efficiency Vermont's Accomplishments

• Creation and Structure of the EEU Program

• Oversight Activities regarding the EEU Program

• EEU Program Budgets

• Current Energy Efficiency Charge Rates

• Information Regarding the Self-Administered Energy Efficiency Program

• Historical Proceedings Related to the EEU Program

• What to do when a Compact Fluorescent Lightbulb Burns Out or Breaks

General Energy Efficiency Utility Information | Vermont Public Service Board Page 1 of 1

http://psb.vermont.gov/utilityindustries/eeu/generalinfo/ 6/10/2014
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 165 (Friday, August 24, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Pages 42865-42866]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-18299]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ARCHITECTURAL AND TRANSPORTATION BARRIERS COMPLIANCE BOARD


Meetings

AGENCY: Architectural and Transportation Barriers Compliance Board.

ACTION: Notice of meetings.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Architectural and Transportation Barriers Compliance Board 
(Access Board) plans to hold its regular committee and Board meetings 
in Washington, DC, Thursday through Friday, September 6-7, 2018 at the 
times and location listed below.

DATES: The schedule of events is as follows:

Thursday, September 6, 2018
    9:30 a.m.-5:00 p.m. Information Meeting on Assembly Areas
Friday, September 7, 2018
    9:00 a.m.-9:30 a.m. Budget Committee
    9:30 a.m.-10:00 a.m. Planning and Evaluation Committee
    10:00 a.m.-11:00 a.m. Technical Programs Committee
    11:00 a.m.-Noon National Council on

[[Page 42866]]

Disability Briefing; Closed to public
    1:30 p.m.-3:30 p.m. Celebration of the 50th Anniversary of the 
Architectural Barriers Act

ADDRESSES: Meetings will be held at the Access Board Conference Room, 
1331 F Street NW, Suite 800, Washington, DC 20004.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For further information regarding the 
meetings, please contact David Capozzi, Executive Director, (202) 272-
0010 (voice); (202) 272-0054 (TTY).

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In lieu of its regularly scheduled Board 
meeting, the Access Board plans to hold a special event celebrating 50 
years of the Architectural Barriers Act (ABA). Guest presentations 
include Judith E. Heumann from the Ford Foundation and federal agencies 
that issue accessibility standards under the ABA. Registration for this 
event is not required and members of the public are invited to join the 
celebration and a reception that follows. This event will be live 
streamed with captioning. More information about the ABA Anniversary 
can be found at: https://www.access-board.gov/news/1935-access-board-to-celebrate-50-years-of-the-architectural-barriers-act.
    All meetings are accessible to persons with disabilities. An 
assistive listening system, Communication Access Realtime Translation 
(CART), and sign language interpreters will be available at the ABA 
anniversary event and committee meetings.
    Persons attending Board meetings are requested to refrain from 
using perfume, cologne, and other fragrances for the comfort of other 
participants (see www.access-board.gov/the-board/policies/fragrance-free-environment for more information).
    You may view the Friday, September 7, 2018 ABA event through a live 
webcast from 1:30 p.m. to 3:30 p.m. at: www.access-board.gov/webcast.

David M. Capozzi,
Executive Director.
[FR Doc. 2018-18299 Filed 8-23-18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8150-01-P
<PAGE>

                                                        EXHIBIT 23.1

                   [Letterhead of Ernst & Young LLP]

           CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement
(Form S-8) pertaining to the Cygnus, Inc. Amended 1991 Employee Stock
Purchase Plan and the Cygnus, Inc. Amended 1999 Stock Incentive Plan of our
report dated January 28, 2000, with respect to the consolidated financial
statements of Cygnus, Inc. included in its Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the
year ended December 31, 1999, filed with the Securities and Exchanges
Commission.

                                                   /s/ Ernst & Young LLP


Palo Alto, California
September 15, 2000
one847holdings_ex101.htm


EXHIBIT 10.1


 


 





 




  





 











  







 







  





-i-











  







 







  





-ii-











  







 





 




  





-1-











  







 





 




  





-2-











  







 





 




  





-3-











  






 





 




  





-4-











  








 





 




  





-5-











  







 





 




  





-6-











  







 





 




  





-7-











  







 





 




  





-8-











  







 





 




  





-9-











  







 





 




  





-10-











  







 





 




  





-11-











  







 




 




  





-12-











  






 




 




  





-13-











  






 




 




  





-14-











  






 




 




  





-15-











  






 




 




  





-16-











  






 




 




  





-17-











  






 




 




  





-18-











  






 




 




  





-19-











  






 




 




  





-20-











  






 






 




  





-21-











  






 






 




  





-22-











  






 





 




  





-23-











  






 





 




  





-24-











  






 





 




  





-25-











  






 




 


-26-
#### George Dunn NOURSE, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, County of Dade, Respondent.

No. 67-740.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Third District.

Nov. 14, 1967.

PER CURIAM.

Certiorari denied.
<PAGE>

                                                                EXHIBIT 11.1
                   Integrated Packaging Assembly Corporation
                       Computation of Earnings Per Share
                     (In thousands, except per share data)


                                                      Year Ended
                                               1996       1995        1994
                                            ----------  --------    ---------
Weighted average common
  shares outstanding...................        11,967     2,111       2,051

Common equivalent shares from
 "options, warrants and convertible
 preferred stock (1)...................          --       2,347       2,347

Weighted average common equivalent
 shares from convertible preferred stock
 calculated using if-converted method.....     1,310      6,123       5,092

Weighted average common stock equivalents
 calculated by the treasury stock method
 applied to options and warrants..........       880        675          --
                                             _______    _______     _______
Weighted average common shares and
 equivalents.............................     14,157     11,256       9,490
                                             =======    =======     =======

Net income...............................    $ 2,317    $  1,550     (2,086)
                                             =======    =======     =======

Net income per share.....................     $0.16       $0.14      ($0.22)
                                             =======    =======     =======


(1)     Pursuant to Securities and Exchange Commission Staff Accounting
        Bulletins, common and common equivalent shares and options issued by the
        Company during the 12 month period prior to the initial public offering
        of the Company common stock have been included as ifthey were
        outstanding for all periods presented.
Exhibit 32.2

                           SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                               SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Brooklyn Cheesecake & Desserts
Company, Inc. (the "Company") on form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2005,
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on or about the date
hereof, I Anthony J. Merante Vice-President and Chief Financial Officer of the
Company certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge,
that

      (iii) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) and
            Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
            and

      (iv)  the information contained in the Report fairly present, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company at the dates and for the periods indicated.


Date: August 11, 2005

                                                   /s/ Anthony J. Merante
                                                   ----------------------
                                                   Anthony J. Merante
                                                   Vice-President and Chief
                                                   Financial Officer


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to Brooklyn Cheesecake & Desserts
Company, Inc. and will be retained by and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commissions or its staff upon request.
#### The KEYES COMPANY, etc., Petitioner, v. Dorothy E. BATES, Respondent.

No. 42447.

Supreme Court of Florida.

July 25, 1972.

Certiorari denied. 261 So.2d 549.

ROBERTS, C. J., and ERVIN, BOYD and DEKLE, JJ., concur.

McCAIN, J., dissents.
#### William HAMMERS, Appellant, v. Kenneth R. SPINKS et al., Appellees.

No. 71-355.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

March 24, 1972.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Palm Beach County; James C. Downey, Judge.

Hubert R. Lindsey, of Farish & Farish, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Stephen C. McAliley, of Carlton, Brennan & McAliley, West Palm Beach, for appellee Kenneth R. Spinks.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed on the authority of Mead v. Bentley, Fla.1952, 61 So.2d 428; Pyms v. Meranda, Fla.1957, 98 So.2d 341; and Cloud v. Fallis, Fla.1959, 110 So.2d 669.

Affirmed.

CROSS and OWEN, JJ., and SALFI, DOMINICK, J., Associate Judge, concur.
EPA Reg. No. 69361-4
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 3478

To provide for the death penalty for homicides involving firearms.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

NOVEMBER 9, 1993

Mr. MANTON introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on the Judiciary

A BILL

To provide for the death penalty for homicides involving

firearms.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That chapter 51 of title 18, United States Code, as

4 amended by this Act, is amended—

5 (1) by adding at the end thereof the following

6 section:

7 ‘‘§ 931. Murder involving firearm

8 ‘‘(a) OFFENSE.—Whoever, under any of the cir9 cumstances described in subsection (b), causes, through

10 the use of a firearm, the death of another person, inten11 tionally, knowingly, or through recklessness manifesting
2

•HR 3478 IH

1 extreme indifferent to human life, or through the inten2 tional infliction of serious bodily injury, shall be punished

3 by death or imprisoned for any term of years or for life.

4 Whenever the Government seeks a sentence of death under

5 this section, the procedures with respect to death penalties

6 under section 903 of the Federal Aviation Act of 1958

7 shall, as nearly as may be, apply with respect to death

8 penalties under this section.

9 ‘‘(b) CIRCUMSTANCES REQUIRED FOR FEDERAL

10 PROSECUTION.—The circumstances referred to in sub11 section (a) are that—

12 ‘‘(1) the conduct of the offender occurred in the

13 course of an offense against the United States; or

14 ‘‘(2) a firearm involved in the offense has

15 moved at any time in interstate or foreign com16 merce.

17 ‘‘(c) INTENT OF CONGRESS.—It is the intent of Con18 gress that this section shall be used to supplement but

19 not supplant the efforts of State and local prosecutors in

20 prosecuting murders involving firearms that have moved

21 in interstate or foreign commerce that could be prosecuted

22 under State law. It is also the intent of Congress that the

23 Attorney General shall give due deference to the interest

24 that a State or local prosecutor has in prosecuting the de25 fendant under State law. This section shall not create any
3

•HR 3478 IH

1 rights, substantive or procedural, enforceable at law by

2 any party in any manner, civil or criminal, nor does it

3 place any limitations on otherwise lawful prerogatives of

4 the Department of Justice.’’; and

5 (2) by amending the table of sections at the be6 ginning of such chapter by adding at the end the fol7 lowing:

‘‘931. Murder involving firearm.’’.

Æ
**EXHIBIT      32.1 **

**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 **

**OF      THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 **

|         |                                                                                                                                                          |                            |
|--------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------|
|         |                                                                                                                                                               |
|    |                                                                                                                                                     |                       |
| :       |                                                                                                                                                          | */S/              Anton Handal* |
|         | *Anton                Handal**Chief                Executive Officer**(Principal                Executive Officer)* *Date:                July 16, 2007* |
|         |                                                                                                                                                               |

----
<PAGE>




                                                                    EXHIBIT 24.2

                                POWER OF ATTORNEY

        KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS: That the undersigned hereby
constitutes and appoints Stig Johansson, Joachim W. Bauer, Kees van Ophem, Neil
E. Craven, Eugene A. Rizzo and Terje Nordahl and each of them (with full power
to act alone) the undersigned's true and lawful attorney-in-fact and agent, with
full power of substitution and resubstitution, for and in the name and on behalf
of the undersigned, to execute any and all instruments and documents, and to do
any and all other acts and things, that any such attorney-in-fact and agent may
deem necessary or advisable, in compliance with the Securities Act of 1933, as
amended (the "Securities Act"), the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended
and any rules, regulations and requirements of the Securities and Exchange
Commission (the "Commission") in respect thereof, in connection with the
registration under the Securities Act of shares of capital of Carrier 1
International S.A. (the "Shares") pursuant to a registration statement (the
"Registration Statement") to be filed with the Commission relating to the
offering from time to time to the public by beneficial holders of Dollar
Warrants and Euro Warrants of Carrier 1 International S.A. and by any other
person named in such Registration Statement of Shares (and any depositary
receipts in respect thereof); including specifically, but without limiting the
generality of the foregoing, the power and authority to execute, for and in the
name and on behalf of the undersigned in any and all capacities, the
Registration Statement, and any and all supplements and amendments (including,
without limitation, any pre-effective and post-effective amendments and any
subsequent registration statements pursuant to Rule 462(b) under the Securities
Act) to such Registration Statement, and any and all other instruments or
documents filed as a part of, or in connection with, such Registration Statement
and supplements and amendments thereto (including, without limitation, if
necessary, a registration statement under the Securities Act of depositary
shares represented by American depositary receipts to be filed on Form F-6); and
the undersigned hereby ratifies and confirms all that such attorneys-in-fact and
agents, or any of them, shall do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.

Signed this 2nd day of August, 2000.

                                                   /s/ Jonathan E. Dick
                                                   -----------------------------
                                                   Name: Jonathan E. Dick