alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
COMPANY'S CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AS OF MARCH 27,1998 AND CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENT OF INCOME FOR THE YEAR ENDED MARCH 27, 1998 LOCATED IN THE COMPANY'S
1998 ANNUAL REPORT TO SHAREHOLDERS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND THE NOTES THERETO.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-27-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             MAR-29-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-27-1998
<CASH>                                          21,073
<SECURITIES>                                     5,091
<RECEIVABLES>                                   71,171
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    108,185
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               210,683
<PP&E>                                          67,360
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 353,846
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          188,393
<BONDS>                                          3,382
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           191
<OTHER-SE>                                     156,865
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   353,846
<SALES>                                        637,268
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               637,268
<CGS>                                          466,494
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  466,494
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               4,700
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 51,774
<INCOME-TAX>                                    19,920
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    31,854
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.69
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.69
        

</TABLE>
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NO. PD-1773-08

JESUS TRANQUILINO CORTEZ, JR. aka JESUS CORTEZ, Jr. Appellant

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS

ON REHEARING OF APPELLANT’S 

PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW

FROM THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

NUECES COUNTY

Per curiam.

O P I N I O N

Appellant was convicted of three counts of murder and one count of aggravated

assault. The jury assessed his punishment at confinement for ninety-nine years and a fine

of $10,000 for the murder counts, and confinement for twenty years and a fine of $10,000

for the aggravated assault count. The Court of Appeals affirmed the convictions. Cortez

v. State, (Tex. App. — Corpus Christi, No. 13-06-00398-CR, delivered August 27, 2008). 
Cortez - 2

Appellant’s petition for discretionary review was dismissed as untimely filed on February

4, 2009. Appellant has filed a motion for rehearing requesting reinstatement of his

petition so that it will be considered by this Court. Appellant’s motion for rehearing is

granted. His petition filed on January 14, 2009, is reinstated as of March 18, 2009, and

will be considered in accord with Tex.R.App.P. 68. The copies must be filed in THIS

Court by March 25, 2009.

Delivered March 18, 2009

Do not publish
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Raymond COMPTON.

No. 59613.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Sept. 19, 1977.

J. Daniel Rivette, Orleans Indigent Defender Program, New Orleans, for defendant-appellant.

William J. Guste, Jr., Atty. Gen., Barbara Rutledge, Asst. Atty. Gen., Harry F. Con-nick, Dist. Atty., Donald T. Giglio, Asst. Dist. Atty., for plaintiff-appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000             DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-2000             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000             JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                          46,521                  46,521
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    2,132                   2,132
<ALLOWANCES>                                       192                     192
<INVENTORY>                                      1,805                   1,805
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                50,883                  50,883
<PP&E>                                             984                     984
<DEPRECIATION>                                     562                     562
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  51,597                  51,597
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            2,676                   2,676
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                            16                      16
<OTHER-SE>                                      48,443                  48,443
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    51,597                  51,597
<SALES>                                          3,043                   5,988
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 3,043                   5,988
<CGS>                                            1,746                   3,407
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    1,746                   3,407
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 1,398                   2,577
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    17                      42
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               (342)                   (330)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    241                     334
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                241                     334
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                       154                 (4,488)
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.02                  (1.13)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.02                  (1.13)


</TABLE>
#### WOLFIE’S RESTAURANT and Royal Indemnity Company, Petitioners, v. Milton GOLDBERGER, (Dec.), et al., Respondents.

No. 44603.

Supreme Court of Florida.

March 1, 1974.

Certiorari denied.

ADKINS, C. J., and ROBERTS, ER VIN and McCAIN, JJ., concur.

BOYD and DEKLE, JJ., dissent.
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 164 (Thursday, August 23, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Page 42646]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-18274]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Department of the Air Force


Record of Decision for the Proposal To Improve F-22 Operational 
Efficency at Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson, Alaska

AGENCY: Department of the Air Force, Department of Defense.

ACTION: Notice of Availability of a Record of Decision.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The United States Air Force signed the Record of Decision for 
the Proposal to Improve F-22 Operational Efficency at Joint Base 
Elmendorf-Richardson, Alaska on August 8, 2018.

ADDRESSES: For further information contact: Ms. Melissa Markell, AFCEC/
CZN, 2261 Hughes Ave., Ste. 155, JBSA Lackland, TX 78236, ph: (210) 
925-2728.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Record of Decision reflects the Air 
Force decision to implement the Final Environmental Impact Statement 
Preferred Alternative, Alternative F, which consists of extending 
Runway 16/34 to the north. During the time that all prepatory actions, 
including funding, agency coordination, and construction are being 
implemented for Alternative F, the Air Force will implement Alternative 
A for more efficient flight operations.
    The decision was based on matters discussed in the Proposal to 
Improve F-22 Operational Efficency at Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson, 
Alaska, Final Environmental Impact Statement, contributions from the 
public and regulatory agencies, and other relevant factors. The Final 
Environmental Impact Statement was made available to the public on 
February 23, 2018 through a Notice of Availability published in the 
Federal Register (Volume 83, Number 37, page 8074) with a 30-day wait 
period that ended on March 25, 2018.

    Authority: This Notice of Availability is published pursuant to 
the regulations (40 CFR part 1506.6) implementing the provisions of 
the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C.. 4321 et 
seq.) and the Air Force's Environmental Impact Analysis Process (32 
CFR parts 989.21(b) and 989.24(b)(7)).

Henry Williams,
Air Force Federal Register Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. 2018-18274 Filed 8-22-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 5001-10-P
I

★

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 3157

To repeal the Cable Television Consumer Protection and Competition Act

of 1992.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

SEPTEMBER 28, 1993

Mr. BARTON of Texas introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Energy and Commerce

A BILL

To repeal the Cable Television Consumer Protection and

Competition Act of 1992.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Cable Consumer Pro5 tection Act of 1993’’.

6 SEC. 2. REPEAL OF 1992 CABLE REREGULATION LAW.

7 (a) REPEAL.—Except as provided in subsection (c),

8 the Cable Television Consumer Protection and Competi9 tion Act of 1992 is repealed.
2

•HR 3157 IH1S

1 (b) EFFECT OF REPEAL; RESTORATION OF PRIOR

2 LAW.—Except as provided in subsection (c), each section

3 of the Communications Act of 1934 amended by the Cable

4 Television Consumer Protection and Competition Act of

5 1992 shall be applied as if the Cable Television Consumer

6 Protection and Competition Act of 1992 had not been en7 acted.

8 (c) RETRANSMISSION CONSENT.—Notwithstanding

9 subsection (a), section 25 of the Cable Television

10 Consumer Protection and Competition Act of 1992 is not

11 repealed.

12 SEC. 3. REGULATIONS RESCINDED.

13 Any regulations prescribed by the Federal Commu14 nications Commission to implement amendments made by

15 the Cable Television Consumer Protection and Competi16 tion Act of 1992 (other than section 25 thereof) shall

17 cease to be effective on the date of enactment of this Act.

18 The Commission shall promptly act to amend or rescind

19 its regulations as necessary to comply with this Act.

Æ
#### Oscar C. TILGHMAN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1562.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Fourth District.

Jan. 18, 1968.

Rehearing Denied Feb. 5, 1968.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
#### SHELL’S CITY, INC., a Florida corporation, Appellant, v. Max WESTERMAN, individually and as Trustee for Gala Showplace, Inc., a dissolved Florida corporation, Appellee.

No. 70-893.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Sept. 25, 1972.

Shutts & Bowen and Thomas H. Anderson and Robert C. Sommervile, Miami, for appellant.

Alan H. Rothstein, City Atty., Miami, for appellee.

Before BARKDULL, C. J., and PEARSON and CHARLES CARROLL, JJ.

ORDER ON MANDATE

PER CURIAM.

Whereas, the judgment of this court was entered on December 7, 1971 (257 So.2d 276) reversing the judgment of the Circuit Court of Dade County, Florida, in the above styled cause; and

Whereas, on review of this court’s judgment, by certiorari, the Supreme Court of Florida, by its opinion and judgment filed July 19, 1972 (265 So.2d 43) and mandate now lodged in this court, quashed this court’s judgment with directions to reinstate the judgment of the trial court;

Now, therefore, It is Ordered that the mandate of this court heretofore issued in this cause on February 23, 1972 is withdrawn, the judgment of this court filed December 7, 1971 is vacated, the said opinion and judgment of the Supreme Court of Florida is herewith made the opinion and judgment of this court and the judgment of the circuit court is reinstated and affirmed. Costs allowed shall be taxed in the circuit court (Rule 3.16, subd. b, Florida Appellate Rules, 32 F.S.A.).
#### Fred L. NEWMAN, Jr., Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. N-172.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Sept. 29, 1970.

Rehearing Denied Oct. 21, 1970.

Fred L. Newman, Jr., in pro. per.

Earl Faircloth, Atty. Gen., and John A. Zebedee, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The briefs and record on appeal having been read and given full consideration and appellant having failed to demonstrate reversible error, the order appealed is hereby affirmed.

JOHNSON, C. J., and WIGGINTON and SPECTOR, JJ., concur.
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

Nos. 98-40689 & 98-40695

Conference Calendar

 

DAVID DAVIS ET AL.,

 Plaintiffs,

WILLIE A. MILTON,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

WAYNE SCOTT, DIRECTOR,

TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE,

INSTITUTIONAL DIVISION, ET AL.,

Defendants-Appellees.

* * * * * * * * * * * * * *

WILLIE A. MILTON ET AL.,

 Plaintiffs,

WILLIE A. MILTON,

 Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

WAYNE SCOTT, DIRECTOR,

TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE,

INSTITUTIONAL DIVISION, ET AL.,

 Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeals from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC Nos. G-96-CV-269 & G-96-CV-360

- - - - - - - - - -
No. 98-40689 & 98-40695

-2-

 

*This matter is being decided by a quorum. 28 U.S.C. §

46(d).

 

** Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

February 10, 1999

Before BARKSDALE and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges.*

PER CURIAM:**

Willie A. Milton, Texas state prisoner #561014, appeals from

the district court’s dismissals of his civil rights complaints as

frivolous and for failure to state a claim upon which relief

could be granted. Milton argues that he was retaliated against

for acting as a jailhouse lawyer for two fellow inmates. We have

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. To the extent

that Milton also raised a claim under the Americans with

Disabilities Act, he has abandoned such claim on appeal. See

Yohey v. Collins, 985 F.2d 222, 224-25 (5th Cir. 1993).

The appeals are without arguable merit and thus frivolous. 

Because the appeals are frivolous, they are DISMISSED. See 5th

Cir. R. 42.2.

The dismissal of these appeals as frivolous and the

dismissals by the district court total four “strikes” for

purposes of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). See Adepegba v. Hammons, 103

F.3d 383, 387-88 (5th Cir. 1996). Milton is now barred from

filing any civil action or appeal in forma pauperis unless he is

under imminent danger of serious physical injury. § 1915(g).

APPEALS DISMISSED.
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

                   CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

    As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the incorporation by
reference of our reports dated April 14, 2000 included in this Form 10-K/A into
the Company's previously filed Registration Statements File No. 333-29681 and
333-32083 pertaining to STAR Telecommunications, Inc. 1997 Omnibus Stock
Incentive Plan, 1996 Stock Incentive Plan, 1996 Outside Director Non Statutory
Stock Option and Employment/Consulting Agreements. It should be noted that we
have not audited any financial statements of the Company subsequent to
December 31, 1999 or performed any audit procedures subsequent to the date of
our report.

ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP

Los Angeles, California
September 11, 2000
EXHIBIT 32



OSE USA, Inc.



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of OSE USA,
Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of our knowledge, that:



| | (1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                      |  |                                                                                   
|--------------------- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|DATED: March 31, 2005 |  | /S/    EDMOND
TSENG                                                               
|                      |  | Edmond Tseng President, Chief Executive Officer and Acting Chief Financial Officer
|                      | 
|DATED: March 31, 2005 |  | /S/    ELTON
LIElton Li
Corporate Controller and Chief
Accounting Officer
**EXHIBIT 32**

 

**STATEMENT PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350AS REQUIRED BYSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with theAnnual Report of John Deere Capital Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Kfor the year ended October 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned herebycertify that to the best of our knowledge:

 

1.               The Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities ExchangeAct of 1934; and

 

2.               The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

 

 
| December 17,  2009 | */s/ S. R. Allen* |   | Chairman and  Principal Executive Officer              |
|-------------------------|-------------------|--------|--------------------------------------------------------|
|                    |              |   |                                                   |
|                    |              |   |                                                   |
| December 17,  2009 | */s/ J. M. Field* |   | Senior Vice  President and Principal Financial Officer |

 

Asigned original of this written statement required by Section 906 has beenprovided to John Deere Capital Corporation and will be retained by John DeereCapital Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission orits staff upon request.

 

67

----
**Exhibit 4.27**
#### Herbert McKINNEY, Individually, and as next friend of Ramona McKinney, a minor, Appellant, v. Helen Wage SACKETT and Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, Appellees.

No. 73-834.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Dec. 27, 1973.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Palm Beach County; Robert S. Hewitt, Judge.

Appeal dismissed.
#### Mrs. Eleanor Grace WEAVER, Admrx. of Estate of A. Q. (Jack) Weaver, Deceased, v. W. L. DEMPSEY, Admr. for Estate of Albert S. Mason, Deceased.

No. 46431.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

Feb. 28, 1972.

Barnett, Montgomery, McClintock & Cunningham; Jackson, Roebuck & Monroe, Newton, for appellant.

James B. Everett, Decatur, O. B. Trip-lett, Jr., Forest, for appellee.

ROBERTSON, Justice:

The case concerns the amount of attorneys’ fees. The lower court heard the evidence as to such fees, including the amount thereof, and made an allowance.

We are unable to say that the lower court was manifestly wrong.

Affirmed.

GILLESPIE, C. J., and JONES, BRADY and INZER, JJ., concur.
<PAGE>   1


                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

                          Consent of Ernst & Young LLP

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form
S-8 No. 333-24135) pertaining to the Palm Harbor Homes, Inc. Employee Savings
Plan, and in the Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-52535) and in the
related Prospectus of Palm Harbor Homes, Inc. and subsidiaries, of our report
dated May 4, 2001, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of Palm
Harbor Homes, Inc. and subsidiaries included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K)
for the year ended March 30, 2001.





May 30, 2001
Dallas, Texas





                                       36
<PAGE>




                                                                  Exhibit 5.1

                                 ATER WYNNE LLP
                          222 S.W. Columbia, Suite 1800
                             Portland, Oregon 97201
                              (503)226-1191 (phone)
                               (503)226-0079 (fax)

                                 August 25, 2000

Board of Directors
Integrated Measurement Systems, Inc.
9525 SW Gemini Drive
Beaverton, OR 97008

Gentlemen:

     In connection with the registration of 200,000 shares of common stock, par
value $.01 per share (the "Common Stock"), of Integrated Measurement Systems,
Inc., an Oregon corporation (the "Company"), under the Registration Statement on
Form S-8 to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on August __,
2000, and the proposed offer and sale of the Common Stock pursuant to the terms
of the Company's 1995 Employee Stock Purchase Plan (the "1995 Plan"), we have
examined such corporate records, certificates of public officials and officers
of the Company and other documents as we have considered necessary or proper for
the purpose of this opinion.

     Based on the foregoing and having regard to legal issues which we deem
relevant, it is our opinion that the shares of Common Stock to be offered
pursuant to the 1995 Plan, when such shares have been delivered against payment
therefor as contemplated by the 1995 Plan, will be validly issued, fully paid
and non-assessable.

     We hereby consent to the filing of this opinion as an exhibit to the
above-mentioned registration statement.

                                  Very truly yours,

                                  /s/ Ater Wynne LLP

                                  Ater Wynne LLP
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Albert DAMOND.

No. 59457.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Sept. 19, 1977.

Robert J. Zibilich, Orleans Indigent Defender Program, New Orleans, for defendant-appellant.

William J. Guste, Jr., Atty. Gen., Barbara Rutledge, Asst. Atty. Gen., Harry F. Con-nick, Dist. Atty., William L. Brockman, Asst. Dist. Atty., for plaintiff-appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.