alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2014408EN.01004201.xml

| 15.11.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 408/42 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.11.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 408/42

---

FUEL CELLS AND HYDROGEN JOINT UNDERTAKING

Publication of the final accounts for the financial year 2013

2014/C 408/42

The complete version of the final accounts may be found at the following address:

http://www.fch-ju.eu/sites/default/files/FCH%20JU%202014%20D2552.pdf

---
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Reserve System

          - 12 CFR Part 226

### CFR Correction

In Title 12 of the Code of Federal Regulations, Parts 220 to 229, revised as of January 1, 2018, on page 414, in § 226.43, paragraph (1) after paragraph (b)(2) and before paragraph (b)(3) is removed.

[FR Doc. 2018-17793 Filed 8-15-18; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 1301-00-D
#### Francis Allen BARTOW, Jr., Appellant, v. Elizabeth Bolles BARTOW, Appellee.

No. 71-355.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Oct. 20, 1971.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed.
<PAGE>



                       SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                             Washington, D.C. 20549

                              -------------------


                                    FORM 8-K

                                 CURRENT REPORT

     Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

       Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported): September 5, 2000



                            KINNARD INVESTMENTS, INC.
             (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)


    MINNESOTA                             0-9377           41-0972952
    (State or other jurisdiction of       (Commission      (IRS Employer
    incorporation or organization)        File No.)        Identification No.)


                             920 Second Avenue South
                          Minneapolis, Minnesota 55402
                    (Address of principal executive offices)

                                 (612) 370-2700
              (Registrant's telephone number, including area code)


<PAGE>

Items 1-4.        Not Applicable.

Item 5.           OTHER EVENTS.

         Information contained in a Press Release dated September 5, 2000 is
incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 99.1 attached hereto.


Item 6.           Not Applicable.

Item 7.           FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND EXHIBITS.

(a)-(b)           Not Applicable.

(c)               Exhibits

                  99.1     Press Release, dated September 5, 2000

Item 8.           Not Applicable


                                       2


<PAGE>

                                   Signatures

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the
registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned hereunto duly authorized.


                                       KINNARD INVESTMENTS, INC.



Dated:  September 5, 2000              By:      /s/ George F. Stroebel
                                          --------------------------------------
                                           George F. Stroebel,
                                           Senior Vice President and
                                           Director of Corporate Development


                                       3


<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT INDEX


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
EXHIBIT             DESCRIPTION                                                 METHOD OF FILING
<S>                 <C>                                                         <C>
   99.1             Press Release, dated September 5, 2000                      Electronic Transmission
</TABLE>
No. 00-7353.

#### Nealy *v.*Texas.

Ct. Crim. App. Tex. Certio-rari denied.
U.S. flag
              An official website of the United States government Skip to main content   end of header Census.gov Newsroom Releases Miscellaneous
 Newsroom Archive
 Skip left menu navigation
 About the Newsroom
 				Facts for Features
 				**News Releases**
 				Press Kits
 				Tip Sheets
 Release Information CB12-200 **Contact:**  Public Information Office
301-763-3030
 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:  TUESDAY, OCT. 23, 2012 Census Bureau Acting Director Receives Roger W. Jones Award for Executive Leadership The U.S. Census Bureau  announced today that Acting Director Thomas L. Mesenbourg received the Roger W. Jones Award for Executive Leadership on Monday, Oct. 22. Since 1978, American University’s School of Public Affairs has granted this prestigious award to more than 60 federal career executives in recognition of their exceptional federal service and dedication to the work and goals of government. The Roger W. Jones Award for Executive Leadership honored Mesenbourg for applying innovative solutions to the challenge of measuring America’s diverse and evolving population and economy. Under his leadership, the Census Bureau released its first mobile app, “America’s Economy,” which provides real-time updates for 16 key economic indicators released from the Census Bureau, Bureau of Labor Statistics and Bureau of Economic Analysis. “Our employees have demonstrated that they can be engines of innovation,” Mesenbourg said. “Over the past several years, they have submitted hundreds of great ideas that save money and improve products and processes.” Mesenbourg has been the acting director of the Census Bureau since Aug. 12. Mesenbourg served as the deputy director and chief operating officer of the Census Bureau from May 2008 until August 2012. As deputy director, he was responsible for directing all of the Census Bureau’s diverse programs as well as its administrative functions. Prior to becoming deputy, Mesenbourg served as associate director for economic programs. In 2011, he was the recipient of the Julius Shiskin Memorial Award for Economic Statistics. In 2004, he was the recipient of a Presidential Rank Award, the government’s highest award for career executives. He joined the Census Bureau in 1972.
  CONNECT WITH US

Information Quality
                    Data Linkage Infrastructure
                    Data Protection and Privacy Policy
                    Accessibility      
                    FOIA
                    Inspector General
                    No FEAR Act
                    U.S. Department of Commerce
                    USA.gov
                   Measuring America's People, Places, and Economy
<PAGE>


                                                                    Exhibit 23.5

                          INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements on
Form S-8 No's. 333-38521, 333-38523, 333-38525, 333-38527, 333-38531, 333-38533,
333-38537, 333-48167, 333-38539, 333-61395, 333-65688, 333-65704, Form S-4
No's. 333-61401 and 333-47926 and Form S-3 No. 333-64979 of Security Capital
Group of our reports dated January 31, 2002, with respect to the consolidated
balance sheets of Regency Centers Corporation as of December 31, 2001 and 2000,
and the related statements of operations, stockholders' equity, and cash flows
for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2001, and the
related schedule, which reports appear in the December 31, 2001 annual report on
Form 10-K/A of Security Capital Group Incorporated

                                       KPMG LLP


Jacksonville, Florida
April 12, 2002
<PAGE>


                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.2


                            SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION


                            OF ROBERT A. COMEY (CFO)




<PAGE>
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the Annual Report of MACC Private Equities Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the year ended September 30, 2002, as filed with the
United States Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Robert A. Comey, Executive Vice President and Treasurer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

                                          /s/ Robert A. Comey
                                        ---------------------------------------
                                        Robert A. Comey,
                                        Executive Vice President and Treasurer
                                        (Chief Financial Officer)

December 20, 2002
Exposure Report

PMN Number: P-10-0224 

8/2/2010 5:04:23 PM

Assessor: Cinalli/SD

Ratings

Non-Occupational: NR Environmental: NR

Drop Criteria: EAB Drop

Criteria Reasoning: No water releases and all other releases 

below threshold

Exposure Based Assessment:

Exposure-Based (Non-Occupational): 

Exposure-Based (Environmental): 

Exposure Parameter Exposure-Based Persistent/Bioaccum Exposure Value

Surface DW:

 Fish Ingestion:

Ground DW:

Inhalation:

Water Releases:

Total Releases:

Consumer Exposure:

Recommended Fate Tests:

Consumer Use expected? N

Consumer Use remarks: 
 

 

 

 

Environmental Release Information for Those Releases Which Went to the Model (Release Identifier 

Number)

1
#### In the Interest of M. E. M., a Juvenile, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 72-1359.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

May 22, 1973.

Phillip A. Hubbart, Public Defender, and Lewis S. Kimler, Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., and Arnold R. Ginsberg, Asst. Atty. Gen., and Sheridan Weinstein, Legal Intern, for appellee.

Before BARKDULL, C. J., and PEARSON and HAVERFIELD, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

On appeal from an order withholding adjudication of delinquency pending future good conduct [for disorderly conduct, Fla. Stat. § 877.03, F.S.A.], we have carefully considered the record and briefs of counsel and are of the belief that there does not appear of record competent substantial evidence to support the finding of the trial judge. Accordingly, we reverse that order with directions to enter a new order adjudicating the appellant non-delinquent.

It is so ordered.
# C_2017349EN.01008501.xml

| 17.10.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 349/85 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.10.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 349/85

---

P8_TA(2015)0327

Subjecting 5-(2-aminopropyl)indole to control measures *

European Parliament legislative resolution of 6 October 2015 on the draft Council implementing decision on subjecting 5-(2-aminopropyl)indole to control measures (10012/2015 — C8-0186/2015 — 2013/0207(NLE))

(Consultation)

(2017/C 349/16)

The European Parliament,

The European Parliament

| — | having regard to the Council draft (10012/2015), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the Council draft (10012/2015),

| — | having regard to Article 39(1) of the Treaty on European Union, as amended by the Treaty of Amsterdam, and Article 9 of Protocol No 36 on Transitional Provisions, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament (C8-0186/2015), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to Article 39(1) of the Treaty on European Union, as amended by the Treaty of Amsterdam, and Article 9 of Protocol No 36 on Transitional Provisions, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament (C8-0186/2015),

| — | having regard to Council Decision 2005/387/JHA of 10 May 2005 on the information exchange, risk-assessment and control of new psychoactive substances (1), and in particular Article 8(3) thereof, |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to Council Decision 2005/387/JHA of 10 May 2005 on the information exchange, risk-assessment and control of new psychoactive substances (1), and in particular Article 8(3) thereof,

1

| — | having regard to Rule 59 of its Rules of Procedure, |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to Rule 59 of its Rules of Procedure,

| — | having regard to the report of the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs (A8-0263/2015), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the report of the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs (A8-0263/2015),

| 1. | Approves the Council draft; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Approves the Council draft;

| 2. | Calls on the Council to notify Parliament if it intends to depart from the text approved by Parliament; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Calls on the Council to notify Parliament if it intends to depart from the text approved by Parliament;

| 3. | Asks the Council to consult Parliament again if it intends to substantially amend the text approved by Parliament; |
| --- | --- |

3.

Asks the Council to consult Parliament again if it intends to substantially amend the text approved by Parliament;

| 4. | Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council and the Commission. |
| --- | --- |

4.

Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council and the Commission.

---

(1)  OJ L 127, 20.5.2005, p. 32.

1

---
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-1022

In Re: SHERROD V. BRIGHT,

Petitioner.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (4:08-cv-00029-TLW-TER)

Submitted: April 16, 2009 Decided: April 27, 2009

Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Sherrod V. Bright, Petitioner Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Sherrod V. Bright petitions for a writ of mandamus seeking an order compelling the district court to rule on his forfeiture action. We conclude that Bright is not entitled to

mandamus relief. Mandamus relief is available only when the petitioner has a clear right to the relief sought. In re First Fed. Sav. &

Loan Ass’n , 860 F.2d 135, 138 (4th Cir. 1988). Further, mandamus is a drastic remedy and should only be used in extraordinary circumstances. Kerr v. United States Dist. Court , 426 U.S. 394, 402 (1976); In re Beard , 811 F.2d 818, 826 (4th Cir. 1987). Mandamus may not be used as a substitute for appeal. In re United Steelworkers , 595 F.2d 958, 960 (4th Cir. 1979). The relief sought by Bright is not available by way of

mandamus. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we deny the petition for writ of mandamus. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED
#### Helen HAGAN, Appellant, v. CITY OF MIAMI, Florida, a municipal corporation, G. T. Green and P. J. Benedetto, Appellees.

No. 67-508.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Third District.

Feb. 20, 1968.

Rehearing Denied March 12, 1968.

Beckham & McAliley, Horton & Schwartz, Miami, for appellant.

Knight, Underwood, Peters, Hoeveler & Pickle, Miami, for appellees.

Before CHARLES CARROLL, C. J., and BARKDULL and HENDRY, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

By this appeal, the appellant [plaintiff in the trial court] seeks review of an adverse final judgment entered on a directed verdict and a previous order striking a count of her amended complaint.

The record reveals the following: The appellant filed an amended complaint against the appellee City and certain of its police officers, alleging in Count I thereof that the employees of the municipality negligently operated a motor vehicle while the appellant was an occupant thereof and, in Count II thereof, alleging that the employees of the municipality had arrested the appellant while she was under the influence of alcohol, *286obviously intoxicated and with impaired faculties; that she was placed in a “paddy wagon” and the appellees were liable to her for injuries sustained because of a failure to have a custodian in the rear of the “paddy wagon” and/or they failed to secure her to the seat therein. The trial judge struck Count II, and the cause came on for trial upon the allegations in Count I as to negligence.

The only evidence tendered by the appellant as to the negligent operation of the vehicle was that it made a “rough turn”. At the conclusion of the plaintiff’s case, the trial judge directed a verdict for the defendants. Subsequently, a final judgment was entered thereon and this appeal ensued. We affirm. See: Swilley v. Economy Cab Co. of Jacksonville, Fla.1950, 46 So.2d 173; Blackman v. Miami Transit Co., Fla.App. 1960, 125 So.2d 128; Jacksonville Coach Company v. Rivers, Fla.1962, 144 So.2d 308; 17 A.L.R.2d 1085, 1095.

Affirmed.
#### Calvin Benjamin SPENCER, Jr., and Government Employees Insurance Company, Appellants, v. John Patrick McLAUGHLIN, a minor, by and through his father and next friend, John B. McLaughlin, et al., Appellees.

No. 71-728.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Jan. 11, 1972.

Bradford, Williams, McKay, Kimbrell, Hamann & Jennings, and W. Sam Holland, Miami, for appellants.

George C. Vogelsang, Adams, George & Wood, Martin Levinson, Arthur Deckle-man, Strauss *&*McCormick, Miami, for appellees.

Before SWANN, C. J., CHARLES CARROLL, J., and LESTER, M. IGNATIUS, Associate Judge.

PER CURIAM.

This appeal is by the plaintiff below from an order dismissing the complaint for failure of the plaintiff to comply with an order of the court to appear for a discovery deposition. It would serve no useful purpose to recite here the proceedings in -the cause leading to the dismissal order. Upon consideration of the record, briefs and arguments of counsel, we conclude that the appellant has not demonstrated abuse of discretion by the trial court. The dismissal order was made under circumstances bringing it within the contemplation and authority of Rule 1.380(d) FRCP, 30 F.S.A.

Affirmed.
Holcim (US) Inc. Phone 406 285 3241 4070Trident Road Fax 4062853100 

# t'Holcim Three Forks, MT59752 www.holcim.com/us June 22, 2011 US EPA Region VIII Attn: Vanessa Hinkle, 8P-AR 1595Wynkoop Street Denver, CO 80202-1129 RE: RESPONSE TO REQUEST - UPDATED INFORM.lo,T!ON FOR

### BART Dear Ms. Hinkle: This is in response to the letter dated May 18, 2011, from your offices, requesting BART updated information. Holcim submitted a SNCR cost estimate to your offices in July 2008. Since thattime, Holcim has installed thermocouples to determine the location ofthe proper temperature zone within the kiln for SNCR addition. Holcim is currently waiting for an approval from DEQ to proceed with the plan and formalize activities for a SNCR trial. Ifyou have any questions or comments, please contact me at406-285-4977.



### .**~~d/}** . g Ganno.7. Environmental Manager

ec: Meg Garakani HectorYbanez

Strength. Performance. Passion.
Exhibit 31-18
**FORM 10-K CERTIFICATION**
I, David E. Meador, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this Form 10-K/A of The Detroit Edison Company; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; 3. (Intentionally omitted); 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, ismade known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this report is being prepared;  b. (Intentionally omitted);  c. Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and proceduresand presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based onsuch evaluation; and  d. Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter(the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and
  The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors andthe audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing theequivalent functions):
 a. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operationof internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and  b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employeeswho have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.   /s/ David E. Meador                     Date:June 24, 2005David E. Meador