alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                      Exhibit 12

                              COMPUTATION OF RATIOS
                                 (IN THOUSANDS)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                 2000             1999             1998             1997             1996

<S>                                            <C>              <C>             <C>               <C>               <C>
Loss from continuing operations
    before provision for income taxes          $(20,892)        $ (8,847)       $ (3,053)         $  1,218          $  648

Add:  Interest expense                               110               26             166              119              53
                                           --------------   --------------   -------------   --------------   -------------
Earnings as adjusted                            (20,782)          (8,821)         (2,887)            1,337             701
                                           ==============   ==============   =============   ==============   =============
                                           --------------   --------------   -------------   --------------   -------------
Fixed Charges:  Interest expense                     110               26             166              119              53
                                           ==============   ==============   =============   ==============   =============

Ratio of earnings to fixed charges                 (189)            (339)            (17)               11              13
                                           ==============   ==============   =============   ==============   =============

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3104 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3104

   To suspend until January 1, 1996, the duty on continuous oxidized 
                      polyacrylonitrile fiber tow.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 21, 1993

 Mr. McInnis introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To suspend until January 1, 1996, the duty on continuous oxidized 
                      polyacrylonitrile fiber tow.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. TEMPORARY DUTY SUSPENSION.

    Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of 
the United States is amended by inserting in numerical sequence the 
following new heading:

       ``  9902.55.01  Continuous oxidized polyacrylo-nitrile fiber tow, total                     No change        No change        On or before 12/   
                        tow measurement of which is 15000 decitex or greater                                                          31/95           ''
                        (provided for in subheading 5501.90.00).................  Free                                                                 .

SEC. 2. EFFECTIVE DATE.

    The amendment made by section 1 applies with respect to articles 
entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after the 
15th day after the date of enactment of this Act.

                                 <all>
```
# C_2014447EN.01003101.xml

| 13.12.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 447/31 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.12.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 447/31

---

Information communicated by Member States regarding closure of fisheries

(2014/C 447/14)

In accordance with Article 35(3) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1224/2009 of 20 November 2009 establishing a Community control system for ensuring compliance with the rules of the common fisheries policy (1), a decision has been taken to close the fishery as set down in the following table:

1

| Date and time of closure | 3.12.2014 |
| --- | --- |
| Duration | 3.12.2014-31.12.2014 |
| Member State | Sweden |
| Stock or group of stocks | COD/03AN. |
| Species | Cod (Gadus Morhua) |
| Zone | Skagerrak |
| Type(s) of fishing vessels | — |
| Reference number | 78/TQ43 |

Date and time of closure

3.12.2014

Duration

3.12.2014-31.12.2014

Member State

Sweden

Stock or group of stocks

COD/03AN.

Species

Cod (Gadus Morhua)

Gadus Morhua

Zone

Skagerrak

Type(s) of fishing vessels

—

Reference number

78/TQ43

---

(1)  OJ L 343, 22.12.2009, p. 1.

1

---
# C_2014238EN.01000601.xml

| 23.7.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 238/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.7.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 238/6

---

Notice for the attention of the persons and entities subject to the restrictive measures provided for in Council Decision 2014/145/CFSP and in Council Regulation (EU) No 269/2014 concerning restrictive measures in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine

2014/C 238/05

The following information is brought to the attention of the persons and entities that are presently designated in the Annex to Council Decision 2014/145/CFSP and in Annex I to Council Regulation (EU) No 269/2014 concerning restrictive measures in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine. The grounds for listing of those persons and entities appear in the relevant entries in those Annexes.

The persons and entities concerned may submit a request to the Council, together with supporting documentation, that the decision to include them on the above-mentioned list should be reconsidered, before 22 August 2014, to the following address:

22 August 2014

| Council of the European Union |
| --- |
| General Secretariat |
| DG C 1C |
| Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175 |
| 1048 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |
| E-mail: sanctions@consilium.europa.eu |

Council of the European Union

General Secretariat

DG C 1C

Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175

1048 Bruxelles/Brussel

BELGIQUE/BELGIË

E-mail: sanctions@consilium.europa.eu

Any observations received will be taken into account for the purpose of the Council’s periodic review, in accordance with the third subparagraph of Article 6 of Decision 2014/145/CFSP and Article 14(4) of Regulation (EU) No 269/2014, of the list of designated persons and entities.

---
#### Nelson NEGRON, Plaintiff, v. The TRAVELERS INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant.

No. 73-140.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Feb. 26, 1973.

Rehearing Denied March 13, 1973.

PER CURIAM.

Certified question dismissed.
Europa
Capital Investments, LLC


100
Europa Drive


Suite
455


Chapel
Hill, NC 27517


 


November
8, 2011


 


Tabacalera
Ysidron, Inc.


307
October Glory Lane 


Apex,
NC 27539


 


Dear
Steven Ysidron,


 


This
letter will serve as our agreement to provide administrative and other miscellaneous services to Tabacalera Ysidron, Inc. Europa
Capital services will also from time to time include help with various transactions that the company may be considering.


 


Europa
Capital Investments, LLC will bill Tabacalera Ysidron, Inc. $5,000 a month to cover the monthly retainer and some incidental expenses
that might occur. Europa Capital will also submit bills associated with transactions directly to the company to be paid.


 


This
agreement will remain in effect until one or the other party informs the other that the agreement is ending.


 


Sincerely,


 


Peter
Coker 


Managing
Director


 





	Accepted:	/s/ Steven Ysidron	 







Steven
Ysidron, President
Order entered July 11, 2022

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-22-00139-CR

KEPHREN MARCUS THOMAS, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 283rd Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. F20-36078-T

ORDER

Before the Court is court reporter Sharina Fowler’s July 7, 2022 request for 

additional time to file the reporter’s record. We GRANT the request and ORDER 

the reporter’s record due by August 8, 2022.

/s/ ROBERT D. BURNS, III

CHIEF JUSTICE
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 13

- 50491 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee

v.
MARVIN DONALD STEELE , Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal s from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 5:11

- CR

- 449

- 1

Before KING, JOLLY, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Marvin Donald Steele challenges the district court’s decision denying his motion to withdraw his guilty plea. A defendant may withdraw his plea before sentencing if he establishes “a fair and just rea son for requesting the withdrawal.” F ED

. R. C RIM

. P. 11(d)(2)(B). Seven factors are relevant to the determination: (1) whether the defendant asserts his innocence, (2) whether the Government will be prejudiced, (3) whether the defendant delayed filing

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances se t forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED September 24, 2014 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 13-50491 Document: 00512780265 Page: 1 Date Filed: 09/24/2014No. 13

- 50491

th e motion, (4) whether withdrawal will “substantially inconvenience” the court, (5) whether the defendant had “close assistance” of counsel, (6) whether the plea was knowing and voluntary, and (7) whether withdrawing the plea will waste judicial resources. United States v. Carr , 740 F.2d 339, 343

- 44 (5th Cir. 1984). We review the district court’s decision for abuse of discretion. United States v. McKnight , 570 F.3d 641, 645 (5th Cir. 2009). The “court abuses its discretion if it bases its decision on an error of law or a clearly erroneous assessment of the evidence.” Id. Steele challenges his guilty plea principally by relying on claims that he did not under stand the plea agreement or the plea hearing, that his attorn ey coerced him to plead guilty , and that he is innocent . The district court rejected his testimony regard ing these claims as not credible and found that the evidence of his guilt was “overwhelming.” T he court “articulated the appropriate standard ” under Carr and “ carefully applied this sta ndard to the facts

. ” United States v. Bounds , 943 F.2d 541, 543 (5th Cir. 1991). As in
Bounds , Steele relies on “conclusory allegations that are clearly refuted by the record.” Id. We find no abuse of discretion, as h e has not shown that the district c ourt denied the motion based on an error of law or a clearly erroneous factual finding. See McKnight , 570 F.3d at 645. The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

2 Case: 13-50491 Document: 00512780265 Page: 2 Date Filed: 09/24/2014
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

RASHID EL MALIK,

Plaintiff

- Appellant,

v.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Defendant

- Appellee. No. 18

- 55322

D.C. No.

2:17

- cv

- 05085

- FMO

- AS

MEMORANDUM *

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Central District of California Fernando M. Olguin, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted March 31, 2020 * *
Pasadena, California

Before: BEA and BADE, Circuit Judges, and McCALLA, ** * District Judge.

R ashid El Malik, a disabled veteran of the U.S. Army

, appeals from the

district court’s dismissal of his Federal Tort Claims Act (“FTCA”) action pursuant

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

*** The Honorable Jon P. M cCalla, United States District Judge for the Western District of Tennessee, sitting by designation. 

# FILED

APR 9 2020

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS2

to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(1)

. El Mal ik proceed ed pro se in the

district court and we appointed counsel on appeal. We have jurisdiction under 28

U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo

, Warren v. Fox Family Worldwide, Inc. , 328

F.3d 1136, 1139 (9th Cir. 2003), and affirm.

1. The district court properly dismissed El Malik’s FTCA claim for lack of

subject matter jurisdiction pursuant to the Veterans’ Judicial Review Act

(“VJRA”)

. The VJRA jurisdictionally barred El Malik’s claim s. See 38 U.S.C.

§ 511(a). As alleged in the second amended complaint, El Malik’s claims were

premised on delays of the Department of Veteran s Affairs (“VA”) in processing

his claims for home

- adaptation benefits and in providing those benefits. R esolving

El Malik’s claims would req uire the district court to “d etermine whether the VA

acted properly in handling [El Malik’s] request for benefits,” and thus, § 511(a)

bars jurisdiction over those claims

. Tunac v. United States , 897 F.3d 1197, 1202

(9th Cir. 2018) (quoting Veterans for Common Sense v. S h in seki , 678 F.3d 1013,

1025 (9th Cir. 2012) )

.

2. El Malik contends on appeal that the district court erred in dismissing his

FTCA claim without leave to amend because, liberally construed, the operative

complaint alleges th e VA negligently supervised a third

- party contractor who

performed home

- adaption work. No fair reading of the complaint reflects any

negligent

- supervision theory of liability. Nor did El Malik oppose dismissal in the3

district court on the grounds that th e operative complaint alleged such a negligence

theory. Because El Malik’s opposition to the government’s motion to dismiss did

not argue that dismissal was unwarranted because he meant to allege a negligent

supervision claim, any such argument is forfeit ed. See Smith v. Marsh , 194 F.3d

1045, 1052 (9th Cir. 1999) (“As a general rule, we will not consider arguments that

are raised for the first time on appeal.”).

AFFIRMED.
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3341 Reported in House (RH)]

                                                 Union Calendar No. 165

103d CONGRESS

  1st Session

                               H. R. 3341

                          [Report No. 103-313]

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

To amend title 38, United States Code, to increase the rate of special 
pension payable to persons who have received the Congressional Medal of 
                                 Honor.

_______________________________________________________________________

                            October 28, 1993

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union 
                       and ordered to be printed

                                                 Union Calendar No. 165
103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3341

                          [Report No. 103-313]

To amend title 38, United States Code, to increase the rate of special 
pension payable to persons who have received the Congressional Medal of 
                                 Honor.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 21, 1993

Mr. Slattery (for himself, Mr. Spence, Mr. McNulty, Mr. Bilirakis, Mr. 
   Montgomery, Mr. Stump, Mr. Applegate, Mr. Everett, Mr. Evans, Mr. 
   Stearns, Mr. Sangmeister, Mr. King, Mr. Edwards of Texas, and Mr. 
   Tejeda) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                     Committee on Veterans' Affairs

                            October 28, 1993

 Additional sponsors: Mr. Thornton, Mr. Gilman, Ms. Brown of Florida, 
   Mr. Ridge, Mr. Hefner, Mr. Richardson, Mr. Stenholm, Mr. Payne of 
                        Virginia, and Mr. Parker

                            October 28, 1993

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union 
                       and ordered to be printed

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend title 38, United States Code, to increase the rate of special 
pension payable to persons who have received the Congressional Medal of 
                                 Honor.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. INCREASE IN RATE OF SPECIAL PENSION FOR PERSONS ON THE MEDAL 
              OF HONOR ROLL.

    (a) In General.--Section 1562(a) of title 38, United States Code, 
is amended by striking ``$200'' and inserting ``$400''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) shall 
apply with respect to months beginning after the date of the enactment 
of this Act.
```
Exhibit 3.2





CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT
TO THE AMENDED AND RESTATED BYLAWS
OF
PHARMACYCLICS, INC.

The undersigned, being the duly acting and appointed Secretary of
Pharmacyclics, Inc., a Delaware corporation, hereby certifies that the Board of
Directors of this corporation amended and restated the first sentence of Article
III, Section 1 of the Bylaws of this corporation to read as follows, effective
as of the date set forth below:

"The authorized number of directors shall be set at seven (7), until the 
date of the 2007 annual meeting of stockholders, at which time the 
authorized number of directors shall be automatically reduced to six
(6)."

Dated: September 17, 2007

/s/ LEIV LEA    
Leiv Lea, Secretary
---

---

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSIONWashington, D.C. 20549

---

FORM 8-K

CURRENT REPORTPursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934

Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported):September 19, 2000

|ADC TELECOMMUNICATIONS, INC.                          
|------------------------------------------------------
|(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|Minnesota                                             
|(State or other jurisdiction
of incorporation)        
|12501 Whitewater Drive, Minnetonka, Minnesota 55343   
|(Address of principal executive offices)              

Registrant's
telephone number, including area code:(952) 938-8080

Not Applicable(Former name or former address, if changed since last report)

---

---

Page
1 of 4 Pages

Exhibit
Index Appears on Page 4

---

## 

Item 5.  Other Events.

On September 20, 2000, ADC Telecommunications, Inc., a Minnesota corporation ("ADC"), and Broadband Access Systems, Inc., a Delaware
corporation ("BAS"), announced the signing of a definitive agreement and plan of merger (the "Merger Agreement"), as a result of which BAS will become a wholly owned subsidiary of ADC (the "Merger").
Through the Merger, which is structured as a tax-free reorganization for U.S. federal income tax purposes, the outstanding capital stock of BAS will be converted into shares of ADC common stock. The
Merger is intended to be accounted for as a "pooling of interests," and is subject to certain conditions, including BAS stockholder approval and receipt of required regulatory approvals.

The
foregoing is a summary of certain terms and conditions of the Merger, and is not intended to be complete. ADC's press release describing the Merger, which is filed as Exhibit 99
to this Form 8-K, is hereby incorporated herein by reference.

Item 7.  Financial Statements, Pro Forma Financial Information and Exhibits.



|Exhibit No. |  | Description                        
|----------- |  | -----------------------------------
|99          |  | Press release describing the Merger

Page
2 of 4 Pages

Exhibit
Index Appears on Page 4

---

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this Report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned hereunto duly authorized.

|Date:  September 20, 2000 |  | ADC TELECOMMUNICATIONS, INC.
|------------------------- |  | ----------------------------
|                          |  | By:                         

Page
3 of 4 Pages

---

INDEX TO EXHIBITS

|Exhibit No. |  | Description                        
|----------- |  | -----------------------------------
|99          |  | Press release describing the Merger

Page
4 of 4 Pages

---

## QuickLinks
U.S. flag
              An official website of the United States government





---

close


back button
 Spain source
 Print Share
 Basic Facts Population
 People per sq. km
 Males per 100 females
 Children per woman
 Goods exported from U.S.
 Goods imported to U.S.
 Change in exports from U.S. for 2014 to 2023
 A Closer Look Source
 Comparisons
 Compared to the U.S.
 Compared to the World
 K = Thousands
                M = Millions
                B = Billions
  Merchandise Trade U.S. Trade in Manufactured Goods
 Top Exported Goods by U.S. State or Territory
 Population Current and Projected Population
 Population by Age and Sex
 Source and Notes Source: U.S. Census Bureau, International Database (demographic data) and USA Trade Online (trade data); Central Intelligence Agency, The World Fact Book (country reference maps). This application presents data for 228 countries and areas of the world with a 2024 population of 5,000 or more. For eleven of those countries and areas, only demographic data are presented. "Data not available" indicates that data are not available from this application.  In such instances, data may be available elsewhere at the census.gov website. Trade figures presented for France do not include data for overseas departments French Guiana, Guadeloupe, Martinique, Mayotte, and Reunion but do include data for dependencies Saint Barthelemy and Saint Martin.  Trade figures for the United Kingdom include data for crown dependencies Guernsey, Isle of Man, and Jersey. To learn more about world population projections, go to Notes on the World Population Clock. To learn more about international trade data, go to Guide to Foreign Trade Statistics. All trade figures are in U.S. dollars on a nominal basis.


CONNECT WITH US
 Information Quality
                    Data Linkage Infrastructure
                    Data Protection and Privacy Policy
                    Accessibility      
                    FOIA
                    Inspector General
                    No FEAR Act
                    U.S. Department of Commerce
                    USA.gov
  Measuring America's People, Places, and Economy
#### ATLANTIC FERTILIZER AND CHEMICAL COMPANY, Appellant, v. SEABOARD COAST LINE RAILROAD COMPANY, Appellee. FLORIDA EAST COAST FERTILIZER COMPANY, Appellant, v. SEABOARD COAST LINE RAILROAD COMPANY and Florida East Coast Railway Company, Appellees.

Nos. 71-776, 71-777.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

March 21, 1972.

Joseph H. Weil, North Bay Village, for appellants.

Smathers & Thompson and L. S. Bon-steel, Shutts & Bowen, and Christopher C. Larimore, Miami, for appellees.

Before BARKDULL, C. J., and PEARSON and CHARLES CARROLL, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

These are appeals by separate plaintiffs from the same final judgment. The causes had been consolidated for disposition in the trial court and were consolidated here for all appellate purposes.

The point presented argues that the trial court erred in each instance when it dismissed plaintiff’s complaint for an alleged overcharge by the railroad for freight shipped by the plaintiff. In each instance the exhibit attached to plaintiff’s complaint affirmatively showed that there was no cause of action. The complaints were properly dismissed. Kimbal v. Travelers Ins. Co., 151 Fla. 786, 10 So.2d 728 (1942).

Affirmed.