alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3499 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 3499

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                July 21 (legislative day, July 20), 1994

  Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Governmental 
                                Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
  To amend the Defense Department Overseas Teachers Pay and Personnel 
                             Practices Act.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. LEAVE FOR DODDS TEACHERS.

    Section 6 of the Defense Department Overseas Teachers Pay and 
Personnel Practices Act (20 U.S.C. 904) is amended--
            (1) in subsection (a) by inserting ``(or, if such teacher 
        is employed in a supervisory position or higher, not less than 
        ten and not more than thirteen)'' after ``ten'';
            (2) in subsection (d) by striking ``of the military 
        department concerned'' and inserting ``of Defense''; and
            (3) by adding at the end the following:
    ``(h) The Director of Dependents' Education, in consultation with 
the Director of the Office of Personnel Management--
            ``(1) shall establish for teachers a voluntary leave 
        transfer program similar to the one under subchapter III of 
        chapter 63 of title 5, United States Code; and
            ``(2) may establish for teachers a voluntary leave bank 
        program similar to the one under subchapter IV of chapter 63 of 
        title 5, United States Code.
Only leave described in the last sentence of subsection (c) of this 
section (relating to leave that may be used by a teacher for any 
purpose) may be transferred under any program established under this 
subsection.''.

            Passed the House of Representatives July 19, 1994.

            Attest:

                                           DONNALD K. ANDERSON,

                                                                 Clerk.
103d CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H.R. 3499

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

  To amend the Defense Department Overseas Teachers Pay and Personnel 
                             Practices Act.
```
#### Edward A. BOUDREAUX v. MAZDA MOTORS OF AMERICA, INC.

No. 60386.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Oct. 28, 1977.

In re: Mazda Motors of America, Inc., applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, Parish of Jefferson, 347 So.2d 504.

Writ denied.
Exhibit 32.1  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002   I, Manfred Ruf, Chief Executive Officer, and Chief Financial Officer of Rarus Minerals Inc. (the "Company"), certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:  (1) The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended September 30, 2011 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of § 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the periods covered in the Report.   /s/ Manfred Ruf Manfred Ruf Chief Executive Officer Chief Financial Officer  Date: October 31, 2011     A signed original of this written statement required by § 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.11

                                 Promissory Note

$132,721.88

                                                   Chester, West Virginia

                                                   July 5, 2000

     On or before the 5th day of July, 2001, the undersigned promises to pay to
the order of MTR Gaming Group, Inc. the sum of $132,721.88 together with
interest at the prime rate (from time to time in effect) plus 1.0% per annum.

     The maker, endorsers, sureties, guarantors and assignors of this note
severally waive demand, presentment of payment, protest and notice of protest,
and nonpayment, and agree and consent that the time for its payment may be
extended, or said note renewed from time to time and for any term or terms by
agreement between the holder and any of them without notice, and that after such
extension or extensions, renewal or renewals, the liabilities of all parties
shall remain as if no extension or renewal has been had. If this note is not
paid when due, and is given to an attorney for collection, or suit filed
thereon, the maker agrees to pay in addition to the unpaid principal and
interest, the costs of collection and reasonable attorney's fees.



                                   /s/ Edson R. Arneault
                                   -----------------
                                   Edson R. Arneault
|                   
|-------------------
|Exhibit 10.23      
|N. Charleston Home2

ASSIGNMENT OF CONTRACT

THIS
ASSIGNMENT (the Assignment) is made effective as of this 8th day
of February, 2011, by and between APPLE
SUITES REALTY GROUP, INC., a Virginia corporation (the Assignor),
and APPLE TEN HOSPITALITY OWNERSHIP, INC.,
a Virginia corporation (the
Assignee).

RECITALS

A.
The Assignor and The Generation Companies, LLC, a North Carolina limited
liability company (Seller) have executed a Purchase Contract dated November 5,
2010, as amended (the Contract) whereby Seller agreed to sell, and the
Assignor agreed to purchase, certain real property located in Charleston, South
Carolina, as more particularly described in the Contract.

B.
The Assignor now desires to assign its rights under the Contract to the
Assignee.

WITNESSETH

FOR
AND IN CONSIDERATION of the sum of Ten Dollars ($10.00) cash in hand paid,
other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are
hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto agree as follows:

1.
Assignment. The Assignor hereby assigns and conveys to Assignee all of
its right, title and interest in, to and under the Contract.

2.
Assumption. The Assignee hereby assumes and agrees to perform all of the
Assignors obligations under the Contract.

IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Assignment as of the

---



day first
above written.

| |                                                           |                   
| | --------------------------------------------------------- | ------------------
| | ASSIGNOR:                                                
| |                                                           |                   
| | APPLE SUITES
 REALTY GROUP, INC., a Virginia
 corporation
| |                                                           |                   
| | By:                                                       | /s/ Nelson
 Knight
| |                                                           |                   

| |                                                                 |                
| | --------------------------------------------------------------- | ---------------
| | Name:                                                           | Nelson
 Knight 
| | Title:                                                          | Vice
 President
| |                                                                 |                
| | ASSIGNEE:                                                      
| |                                                                 |                
| | APPLE TEN
 HOSPITALITY OWNERSHIP, INC., a Virginia
 corporation
| |                                                                 |                

| |     |                      
| | --- | ---------------------
| | By: | /s/ David P.
 Buckley
| |     |                      

| |        |                  
| | ------ | -----------------
| | Name:  | David P.
 Buckley
| | Title: | Vice
 President  

---
#### DISNEY v. The PRUDENTIAL INS. CO. OF AMERICA.

No. 39417.

Supreme Court of Florida.

March 1970.

Certiorari denied without opinion. 229 So.2d 299.
| (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                         |   |
|-------------------------|--------|
|                    |   |
| Kevin Landis            |   |
| Chief Executive Officer |   |
|                         |   |
|-------------------------|--------|
|                    |   |
| Omar Billawala          |   |
| Chief Financial Officer |   |
# C_2015280EN.01000601.xml

| 25.8.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 280/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.8.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 280/6

---

Notice of the impending expiry of certain anti-dumping measures

(2015/C 280/07)

1.   As provided for in Article 11(2) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009 of 30 November 2009 (1) on protection against dumped imports from countries not members of the European Community, the Commission gives notice that, unless a review is initiated in accordance with the following procedure, the anti-dumping measures mentioned below will expire on the date mentioned in the table below.

1

2.   Procedure

Procedure

Union producers may lodge a written request for a review. This request must contain sufficient evidence that the expiry of the measures would be likely to result in a continuation or recurrence of dumping and injury.

Should the Commission decide to review the measures concerned, importers, exporters, representatives of the exporting country and Union producers will then be provided with the opportunity to amplify, rebut or comment on the matters set out in the review request.

3.   Time limit

Time limit

Union producers may submit a written request for a review on the above basis, to reach the European Commission, Directorate-General for Trade (Unit H-1), CHAR 4/39, 1049 Brussels, Belgium (2) at any time from the date of the publication of the present notice but no later than 3 months before the date mentioned in the table below.

2

4.   This notice is published in accordance with Article 11(2) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009 of 30 November 2009.

| Product | Country(ies) of origin or exportation | Measures | Reference | Date of expiry (3) |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Melamine | The People’s Republic of China | Anti-dumping duty | Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 457/2011 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty and collecting definitively the provisional duty imposed on imports of melamine originating in the People’s Republic of China (OJ L 124, 13.5.2011, p. 2). | 14.5.2016 |

Product

Country(ies) of origin or exportation

Measures

Reference

Date of expiry (3)

3

Melamine

The People’s Republic of China

Anti-dumping duty

Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 457/2011 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty and collecting definitively the provisional duty imposed on imports of melamine originating in the People’s Republic of China (OJ L 124, 13.5.2011, p. 2).

14.5.2016

---

(1)  OJ L 343, 22.12.2009, p. 51.

1

(2)  Fax: +32 22956505.

2

(3)  The measure expires at midnight of the day mentioned in this column.

3

---
Exhibit 11
                             DETECTION SYSTEMS, INC.
                        COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE
                      (In thousands, except per share data)


Year Ended March 31,                                2000       1999        1998
                                                    ----       ----        ----

Net income applicable to common stock             $3,468     $4,471      $1,382
                                                   =====      =====       =====
Weighted average number of shares                  6,344      6,319       5,433
                                                   =====      =====       =====
Basic earnings per share                           $0.55      $0.71       $0.25
                                                   =====      =====       =====
Shares attributable to deferred
compensation plans and stock
options and warrants                                 480        508         290
                                                    ====       ====        ====
Diluted earnings per share:                        $0.51      $0.65       $0.24
                                                    ====       ====        ====
**UN PUBLISHED** 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 15**  **- 1391** 

DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST COMPANY, AS TRUSTEE FOR CARRINGTON MORTGAGE LOAN TRUST, SERIES 2005

- OPT2, ASSET BACKED PASS

- THROUGH CERTIFICATES, SERIES 2005

- OPT 2 , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,

v.
IVY K. INOCENCIO; MARISSA P. GOMEZ; EQUITY TRUSTEES, LLC; UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Defendants

- Appellees

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia , at Alexandria

. T. S. Ellis , III , Senior District Judge. ( 1:15

- cv - 00015

- TSE

- MSN )

Submitted : December 29, 2015 Decided: January 7, 2016

Before GREGORY and KEENAN , Circuit Judges , and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge

.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.

S. Mohsin Reza, Mary C. Zinsner, TROUTMAN SANDERS LLP, Tysons Corner, Virginia, for Appellant. Carolina D. Ciraolo, Acting Assistant Attorney General, Thomas J. Clark, Regina S. Mariar t y, DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Appellees.

Unpublished opinio ns are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Deutsche Bank National Trust Co. brought suit in Virginia state court seeking rescission of a foreclosure sale that took place approximately four years earlier. The United States
removed the actio n to district court and moved to dismiss pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(1), (6) . The district court granted the motion to dismiss as to the United States, based on lack of subject matter jurisdiction. B ecause there were no viable remaining claim s as a gainst the remaining defendants, the
court also dismissed the action in its entirety. We have reviewed the parties’ briefs , as well as the record on appeal , and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350   In connection with the Quarterly Report of Titan Holding Group, Inc., (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Brian Kistler, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, to my knowledge that:  (i)  the accompanying Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Act); and  (ii)  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.   TITAN HOLDING GROUP, INC.  /s/: Brian Kistler BRIAN KISTLER Chief Executive Officer Chief Financial Officer  May 11, 2011
MAKKUDAL L SUITE SH-317 

COLORADO SENATE HART OFFICE BUILDING 

WASHINGTON, DC 20510 

' '^PARTMFMT OF *^°^' 224-5M1 

mnitEd3mtEs3Enatt:|N3gTMoN 

WASHINGTON, DC 20510 i-'innui'iO 

August25,2010 ^^'0 !^'f^T - I A 10 2 3 

Ms. Aloha Ley 

Associate Director, Small Community Air Service Development Program 

Office of Aviation Analysis 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Ave SE 

Washington, D.C. 20590 

Dear Ms. Ley, 

1 am pleased to write this letter of support on behalf of the Telluride Montrose Regional Air Organization 

(TMRAO), which is working to obtain funding through the Department of Transportation's Small 

Community Air Service Development Program. TMRAO is partnering with the Telluride Regional 

Airport, Marketing Telluride Inc., the town of Telluride, the town of Mountain Village, and San Miguel 

County to improve outbound flight service from Telluride. 

With the important start-up funds received through this grant, TMRAO and its partners hope to increase 

available seats to meet market demand for morning outbound flights from Telluride. Also, they hope 

such funds will be a springboard for bringing a second carrier service to Telluride during the summer 

months to bolster competition. The community hopes that increasing competition in this market will lead 

to a reduction in air fares, which currently are among the highest in the nation. Due to its imique 

geography, Telluride lies in a relatively isolated area of our state, making the economic activity generated 

by its airport critical to the community's local economy and economic development The additional 

enplanements resulting from this grant funding would be a much needed boon to Telluride and the 

siuTounding region. 

I ask that you give the Telluride Montrose Regional Air Organization's application every appropriate 

consideration consistent with all applicable laws and regulations. 

Sincerely, 

V^oiUMiiMarkUdall 

United States Senator 

MEU/reo
<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT 31.1

                            SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION
                           OF DAVID R. SCHRODER (CEO)

<PAGE>

                                  CERTIFICATION

         I, David R. Schroder, certify that:

         1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of MACC Private
Equities Inc.;

         2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to sate a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

         3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and
for, the periods presented in this report;

         4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

                  a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused
         such disclosure controls or procedures to be designed under our
         supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
         registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to
         us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
         which this report is being prepared;

                  b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure
         controls and presented in this report our conclusions about the
         effectiveness of the controls and procedures, as of the end of the
         period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

                  c) Presented in this report our conclusions about the
         effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our
         evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

         5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's
board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

                  a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of
         internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely
         to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
         summarize and report financial information; and

                  b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves
         management or other employees who have a significant role in the
         registrant's internal controls.

Date: December 22, 2003

    /s/ David R. Schroder
-----------------------------------
David R. Schroder
President and Secretary
(principal executive officer)
#### STATE of Florida ex rel. Bobby Joe OUTLER, Relator, v. Louie L. WAINWRIGHT, Director, Division of Corrections for the State of Florida, Respondent.

No. 73-165.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Feb. 20, 1973.

PER CURIAM.

Habeas Corpus dismissed.
<PAGE>   1





                                                                   EXHIBIT 11-14



                               DTE ENERGY COMPANY
                      BASIC AND DILUTED EARNINGS PER SHARE
                                 OF COMMON STOCK
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                                  Year Ended December 31              
                                                    ------------------------------------------------
                                                          1998             1997             1996
                                                          ----             ----             ----

                                                           (Thousands, except per share amounts)

BASIC:
<S>                                                 <C>               <C>              <C>         
   Net Income.....................................  $    443,012      $    417,333     $    309,296
   Weighted average number of common
     shares outstanding (a).......................       145,076           145,101          145,120
   Earnings per share of Common Stock
     based on weighted average number
     of shares outstanding........................  $       3.05      $       2.88     $       2.13

DILUTED:
   Net Income.....................................  $    443,012      $    417,333     $    309,296
   Weighted average number of common
     shares outstanding (a).......................       145,076           145,101          145,120
   Incremental shares from assumed
     conversion of options........................           106                12                -
                                                    ------------      ------------     ------------
                                                         145,182           145,113          145,120
                                                    ============      ============     ============

   Earnings per share of Common Stock
     assuming conversion of options...............  $       3.05      $       2.88     $      2.13

</TABLE>



---------------------------


(a)  Based on a daily average.