alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                               [LETTERHEAD]

                                                 September 21, 2000


Rogers International Raw Materials Fund, L.P.
c/o  Beeland Management Company, L.L.C.
1000 Hart Road
Barrington, Illinois 60010

         Re:      Rogers International Raw Materials Fund, L.P.

Ladies and Gentlemen:

         We have acted as counsel for Rogers International Raw Materials Fund,
L.P. (the "Partnership"), a limited partnership organized under the Illinois
Revised Uniform Limited Partnership Act (the "Act"), in connection with the
preparation and filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") under
the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, of a Registration Statement on Form S-1
(the "Registration Statement"), relating to 2,000,000 units of limited
partnership interests in the Partnership (the "Units").

         In this connection, we have examined originals or photostatic or
certified copies of all such documents, records, certificates and agreements as
we have deemed relevant and necessary as a basis for the opinions hereinafter
set forth.

         On the basis of the foregoing and assuming that (i) those persons and
entities who subscribe for Units (the "Limited Partners") in the offering
described in the Prospectus which is included within the Registration Statement
(the "Prospectus") have appropriately completed, executed and delivered a
Subscription Agreement to the General Partner of the Partnership (the "General
Partner"), (ii) the General Partner has duly accepted such persons as limited
partners of the Partnership, (iii) each Limited Partner has paid to the
Partnership the full consideration due for the Units subscribed to by the
Limited Partner, (iv) the Limited Partners do not participate in the control of
the business of the Partnership, and (v) at least 100,000 Units are in fact
sold, as described in the Prospectus and the Partnership's Limited Partnership
Agreement (the "Agreement"), we are of the opinion that: (a) the Units to be
issued to the

<PAGE>

September 21, 2000
Page 2



Limited Partners have been duly authorized, and, when issued, will
be validly issued and outstanding, fully paid and nonassessable limited
partnership interests in the Partnership, and (b) the Limited Partners will be
entitled to all of the benefits of limited partners as provided in the
Agreement.

         We hereby consent to the filing of this opinion with the SEC as an
exhibit to the Registration Statement. We also consent to the reference to our
firm under the caption "Legal Matters" in the Prospectus.

                                Very truly yours,




                                    WILDMAN, HARROLD, ALLEN & DIXON



                                    /s/ WILDMAN, HARROLD, ALLEN & DIXON
#### LAUNDRAMATION CORP., etc., Appellant. v. SANITARY LINEN SERVICE CO OF FLORIDA, etc., et al., Appellees.

No. 72-1381.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Feb. 20, 1973.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal quashed.
#### Ferrante *v.*L. J. Smith Co. et al., Appellants.

Argued September 25, 1934.

Before Keller, Cukkiiigham, Balbrige, Stabteelb, Parker and James, JJ.

*408
      *Joseph J. Tunney,*for appellants.

*George Maxman,*and with him *John M. DiSilvestro,*for appellee.

November 22, 1934:

Per Curiam,

Claim was made on behalf of Francescapaola Impicciatore, widow of Gruiseppe Impicciatore, also known as Joseph Bigatore, for compensation because of the death of her husband, who was accidentally killed while in the course of his employment with the defendant, L. J. Smith Company. The claimant was, and is, a non-resident. Her claim is accordingly governed by section 307, paragraph 7, and section 310 of the Workmen’s Compensation Act, to wit: “No compensation shall be payable under this section to a widow, unless she was living with her deceased husband at the time of his death, or was then actually dependent upon him for support” (section 307-7); and “Compensation under this article to alien dependent widows and children, not residents of the United States, shall be two-thirds of the amount provided in each case for residents” (section 310).

The referee refused to allow compensation. The Workmen’s Compensation Board reversed and awarded compensation, finding, inter alia: “From the evidence of record we find that claimant was the lawful wife of defendant’s deceased employee; that their separation was solely for the purpose of enabling decedent to have employment and that there was no repudiation of decedent’s legal obligation to support his wife; that during the period of their separation and up to the time of his accidental death claimant was actually dependent upon decedent for support; *409that he provided partial support by allowing her the use of a piece of land he owned in Italy and that he also made remittances to her amounting to about 2,000 lire yearly. Other than the support provided by her husband claimant had no means of maintenance. ’ ’

There is ample evidence to support the finding; and were we the fact-finding body, — which we are not — we would agree with the board rather than the referee. In any event, we are bound by the board’s findings of fact, if there is evidence to support them.

The judgment is affirmed at the costs of the appellants.
# United States Court **of Appeals**  **f or the Fifth Circuit** 

No. 19

- 60420 Summary Calendar

**Edgar Dodany Reyes Padilla,**

Petitioner **,**

versus

**William P. Barr,** U.S. Attorney General **,**
Respondent

**.**

Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals BIA No. A201 143 975

Before **King, Smith,** and **Wilson,** Circuit Judges

**. Per Curiam**  **:** *
Edgar Dodany Reyes Padilla, a native and citizen of Honduras, petitions for review of a decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) dismissing his appeal from the I mmigration J udge’s (IJ) denial of his application for withholding of removal , which he sought based on , inter alia,

* Pursuant to **5th Cir cuit**  **R ule**  47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in **5th Cir cuit**  **R ule**  47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED October 27, 2020

Lyle W. Ca yce Clerk Case: 19-60420 Document: 00515617341 Page: 1 Date Filed: 10/27/2020No. 19

- 60420

2 his membership in a particular social group. Reyes Padilla does not brief and
thus has abandoned any challenge to the BIA’s additional rulings concerning his applications for withholding of removal based on his political opinion and
for relief under the C onvention Against Torture. See Zhu v. Gonzales , 493 F.3d 588, 593 n.10 (5th Cir. 2007). Furthermore, his failure to exhaust administrative remedies as to his CAT claim is a jurisdictional bar to our
consideration of the issue. See Omari v. Holder , 562 F .3d 314, 318

- 19 (5th Cir. 2009).

In this court, Reyes Padilla argues that he showed his eligibility for withholding of removal because he established his membership in a particular social group recognized by the IJ and the BIA , namely the Reyes family , a nd members of the group have suffered persecution. He contends that the persecution of other members of the Reyes family entitles him to a rebuttable presumption that he would suffer persecution if he is return ed to Honduras. Alternatively, Reyes contends that he showed a clear probability of future persecution based on the persecution of other members of the Reyes family.
It is undisputed that Reyes Padilla has never suffered any physical
harm. Given Reyes Padilla’s testimon y that , notwithstanding threats, members of his family have remained in Honduras unharmed for years , the denial of his application for withholding of removal was supported by
substantial evidence , and he has not demonstrated that the evidence compels

a con trary conclusion

. See Zhu , 493 F.3d at 596

- 97; see also Martinez

- Lopez v.

Barr , 943 F.3d 766, 771 (5th Cir. 2019); Gonzalez

- Soto v. Lynch , 841 F.3d 682,

683

- 84 (5th Cir. 2016); Arif v. Mukasey , 509 F.3d 677, 680

- 82 (5th Cir. 2007)

.
**IT IS ORDERED** that th e petition for review is **DENIED** in part
and is **D ISMISSED**  in part. Case: 19-60420 Document: 00515617341 Page: 2 Date Filed: 10/27/2020
**EXHIBIT 31.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

 

I, Robert A. Hamwee, Chief Executive Officer of New Mountain Finance Holdings, L.L.C., certify that:

 

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of New Mountain Finance Holdings, L.L.C.;

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:

 

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

 

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

 

c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

 

a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

 

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

 

Dated this day of August 11, 2011

 

 
| /s/ Robert A. Hamwee |
|----------------------|
| **Robert A. Hamwee** |

 

----
From: "McWilliams, Douglas A." < douglas.mcwilliams@squirepb.com >

Date: April 24, 2015 at 4:34:12 PM EDT

To: " alan.greenberg@usdoj.gov " < alan.greenberg@usdoj.gov >, "' Marks.Matthew@epa.gov '"

< Marks.Matthew@epa.gov >

Cc: "Kacenjar, Allen A." < allen.kacenjar@squirepb.com >

Subject: Redacted Metso Reports Released from CBI [I

‐ AMS.FID1382176]

Alan and Matt,

In your March 2, 2015 e

‐ mail you asked for the release from CBI of two Metso reports for use in the rulemaking

record for the BART FIP Settlement rule.

1) Attached please find a redacted version of the Metso August 7, 2014, “Technical Analysis for applying

LNB technology to UTAC L2 Grate Kiln while minimizing product quality issues” that Cliffs and Metso

agree to release from CBI protection. Cliffs and Metso preserve their CBI claim and other protections

for the un

‐ redacted version of this Metso report submitted as Shared Material under the Agreement

Regarding Non

‐ Waiver and Use of Shared Information.

2) The Metso analysis of the Tilden furnace dated August 20, 2013 was updated on January 13, 2015 to add

simulations based on vendor required design parameters for operating Coen LNB in the Tilden

Furnace. The conclusions from these additional simulations are similar to those in the August 20, 2013

Metso simulations. We propose the updated simulations for inclusion in the rulemaking record because

they replace assumed design parameters with those specified by the LNB vendor. Attached is a

redacted version of the Metso January 13, 2015, “Technical Analysis for Tilden I Phase III additional

simulations while applying COEN LNB technology” for which Cliffs and Metso are not claiming CBI

protection. Cliffs and Metso preserve their CBI claim and other protections for the August 20, 2013

Metso report submitted as Shared Material under the Agreement Regarding Non

‐ Waiver and Use of

Shared Information.

We expect to forward a redacted version of the FCT report for public use that you requested very soon. Thank

you for providing EPA’s thoughts on the information from the Coen documents that EPA is relying on to support

its rulemaking. We are also considering your request for the release from CBI of the SO2 analyses in

Attachments L and BB to our comments on the proposed FIP. Let’s connect on these issues next week.

Sincerely,
257 La. 990

#### Mrs. Winnie McMULLAN v. ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY and the Continental Insurance Company.

No. 51210.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

March 10, 1971.

In re: Mrs. Winnie E. McMullan applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, Parish of East Baton Rouge. 242 So.2d 921.

Writ denied. We find no error of law.
<PAGE>
                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.72



                    [BAXTER HEALTHCARE CORPORATION LETTERHEAD]


                                                               Account# 34251865

                                   AMENDMENT

This Amendment dated this 28th day of January 2002, is between Baxter Healthcare
Corporation with offices at Route 120 and Wilson Road, WG1-3S, Round Lake, IL
60073 ("Baxter") and Coram, Inc., with offices at 1675 Broadway, Suite 900,
Denver, CO 80202 ("Facility").

This Addendum will be in effect for forty-five (45) days for your consideration.

Baxter and Facility entered into a Purchase Agreement dated October 23, 2000
(the "Agreement").

Baxter and Facility agree to amend the Agreement as follows:


1.       Paragraph 9, is amended to provide that payment terms shall be 2%, 20
         net 30 days from invoice date through June 30, 2002. Beginning July 1,
         2002, payment terms will return to 2%, 15 net 30 days from invoice
         date.

2.       All other terms and conditions of the Agreement will remain in full
         force and effect.

3.       This Amendment shall become effective fifteen (15) calendar days from
         date on which Baxter countersigns this Amendment.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, authorized representatives of the parties have executed this
Agreement.


CORAM, INC.                               BAXTER HEALTHCARE CORPORATION

BY: /s/ FRANK GEIGER                      BY:  /s/ LORI RUMER
   ---------------------------------         ---------------------------------
NAME:  Frank Geiger                       NAME:   Lori Rumer
     -------------------------------           -------------------------------
TITLE: Sr. Vice President MM              TITLE: Sales Contract Administrator
      ------------------------------            ------------------------------
DATE:      2/1/02                         DATE:        2/7/02
     -------------------------------           -------------------------------


<PAGE>
                    [BAXTER HEALTHCARE CORPORATION LETTERHEAD]


February 7, 2002



Mr. Frank Geiger
Senior Vice President
Coram, Inc.
1675 Broadway, Suite 900
Denver, CO 80202


Re:  34251865 / Amendment
     Coram, Inc.


Dear Mr. Geiger:

Enclosed for your records is a copy of the countersigned Amendment between
Coram, Inc. and Baxter Healthcare Corporation.

This Amendment shall become effective February 22, 2002.

Should you have any questions, please feel free to contact Rose Lorella,
Director of National Accounts at (800) 285-3536 ext. 7597 or your Sales Contract
Administrator at (800) 388-4631 ext. 3346.

We appreciate having this opportunity to be of service to you.

Sincerely,

/s/ HEATHER MARCELAIN

Heather Marcelain
Sales Contract Administrator

Enclosure


cc: Rose Lorella
    Mike Buha
    File
United States Court of Appeals

For the Eighth Circuit

___________________________

No. 18-2037

___________________________

Andrew Stephen Williams

lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellant

v.

Minnesota Department of Corrections; Tom Roy; Eddie Miles; Minnesota

Correctional Facility-Faribault, Mailroom Department; Minnesota Correctional

Facility-Faribault, Property Department; Rice County; City of Faribault;

Washington County; City of Bayport; County of Dakota; City of Hastings

lllllllllllllllllllllDefendants - Appellees

 ____________

Appeal from United States District Court 

for the District of Minnesota - Minneapolis

 ____________

 Submitted: May 1, 2019

Filed: May 6, 2019

[Unpublished]

____________

Before LOKEN, GRUENDER, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges. 

____________

PER CURIAM.
Andrew Williams appeals the district court’s dismissal of his pro se complaint. 

1

Having carefully reviewed the record as to the claims Williams raises on appeal, and

the parties’ arguments on appeal, we find no basis for reversal. See Plymouth Cty.

v. Merscorp, Inc., 774 F.3d 1155, 1158 (8th Cir. 2014) (de novo review of Fed. R.

Civ. P. 12(b) dismissal order). Accordingly, the judgment is affirmed. See 8th Cir.

R. 47B.

______________________________

The Honorable Joan N. Ericksen, United States District Judge for the District 1

of Minnesota, adopting the report and recommendations of the Honorable Hildy

Bowbeer, United States Magistrate Judge for the District of Minnesota.

-2-
# C_2015098EN.01000401.xml

| 25.3.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 98/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.3.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 98/4

---

Adoption of Commission Decision on the transitional national plan communicated by Romania in accordance with Article 32(5) of Directive 2010/75/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council

(2015/C 98/04)

On 20 March 2015, the Commission adopted Decision C(2015) 1758 on the transitional national plan communicated by Romania in accordance with Article 32(5) of Directive 2010/75/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24 November 2010 on industrial emissions (integrated pollution prevention and control) (1).

1

This document is available on the following internet site: https://circabc.europa.eu/w/browse/36205e98-8e7a-47d7-808d-931bc5baf6ee

---

(1)  OJ L 334, 17.12.2010, p. 17.

1

---
# C_2014025EN.01000101.xml

| 28.1.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 25/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.1.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 25/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.7041 — Clariant/Tasnee/JV)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2014/C 25/01

On 17 January 2014, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32014M7041. EUR-Lex is the online access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32014M7041. EUR-Lex is the online access to the European law.

---
# C_2013070EN.01000101.xml

| 9.3.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 70/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.3.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 70/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.6808 — PAI Partners/Industrial Parts Holding)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2013/C 70/01

On 11 February 2013, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32013M6808. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32013M6808. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.

---