Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 161 / Monday, August 20, 2018 / Rules and Regulations 42031 

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND 

SECURITY 

Coast Guard 

33 CFR Part 165 

[Docket No. USCG–2018–0716] 

Recurring Safety Zone; Wheeling 

Annual Dragon Boat Race, Wheeling, 

WV 

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS. 

ACTION: Notice of enforcement of 

regulation. 

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard will enforce 

the safety zone for the Wheeling Annual 

Dragon Boat Race to provide for the 

safety of persons, vessels, and the 

marine environment on the navigable 

waters of the Ohio River during this 

event. Our regulation for marine events 

within the Eighth Coast Guard District 

identifies the regulated area for this 

event in Wheeling, WV. During the 

enforcement periods, entry into this 

zone is prohibited unless authorized by 

the Captain of the Port Marine Safety 

Unit Pittsburgh or a designated 

representative. 

DATES: The regulations in 33 CFR 

165.801, Table 1, Line 88 will be 

enforced from 8 a.m. through 3 p.m. 

August 25, 2018. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If 

you have questions about this notice of 

enforcement, call or email Petty Officer 

Jennifer Haggins, Marine Safety Unit 

Pittsburgh, U.S. Coast Guard; telephone 

412–221–0807, email 

Jennifer.L.Haggins@uscg.mil. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Coast 

Guard will enforce a safety zone for the 

Wheeling Annual Dragon Boat Race in 

33 CFR 165.801, Table 1, Line 88 from 

8 a.m. through 3 p.m. on August 25, 

2018. This action is being taken to 

provide for the safety of persons, 

vessels, and the marine environment on 

the navigable waters of the Ohio River 

during this event. Our regulation for 

marine events within the Eighth Coast 

Guard District, § 165.801 specifies the 

location of the regulated area for the 

Wheeling Annual Dragon Boat Race. 

Entry into the regulated area is 

prohibited unless authorized by the 

Captain of the Port Marine Safety Unit 

Pittsburgh (COTP) or a designated 

representative. Persons or vessels 

desiring to enter into or pass through 

the regulated area must request 

permission from the COTP or a 

designated representative. They can be 

reached on VHF FM channel 16. If 

permission is granted, all persons and 

vessels shall comply with the 

instructions of the COTP or designated 

representative. 

In addition to this notice of 

enforcement in the Federal Register, the 

COTP or a designated representative 

will inform the public through 

Broadcast Notices to Mariners (BNMs), 

Local Notices to Mariners (LNMs), 

Marine Safety Information Bulletins 

(MSIBs), and/or through other means of 

public notice as appropriate at least 24 

hours in advance of each enforcement. 

Dated: August 10, 2018. 

F.M. Smith, 

Lieutenant Commander, U.S. Coast Guard, 

Acting Captain of the Port Marine Safety Unit 

Pittsburgh. 

[FR Doc. 2018–17851 Filed 8–17–18; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 9110–04–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

40 CFR Part 52 

[EPA–R10–OAR–2018–0060; FRL–9982– 

46—Region 10] 

Air Plan Approval; Washington; 

Interstate Transport Requirements for 

the 2012 PM2.5 NAAQS 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA). 

ACTION: Final rule. 

SUMMARY: The Clean Air Act requires 

each State Implementation Plan (SIP) to 

contain adequate provisions prohibiting 

emissions that will have certain adverse 

air quality effects in other states. On 

February 7, 2018, the State of 

Washington made a submission to the 

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 

to address these requirements. The EPA 

is approving the submission as meeting 

the requirement that each SIP contain 

adequate provisions to prohibit 

emissions that will contribute 

significantly to nonattainment or 

interfere with maintenance of the 2012 

annual fine particulate matter (PM2.5) 

national ambient air quality standard 

(NAAQS) in any other state. 

DATES: This final rule is effective 

September 19, 2018. 

ADDRESSES: The EPA has established a 

docket for this action under Docket ID 

No. EPA–R10–OAR–2018–0060. All 

documents in the docket are listed on 

the https://www.regulations.gov 

website. Although listed in the index, 

some information is not publicly 

available, e.g., CBI or other information 

the disclosure of which is restricted by 

statute. Certain other material, such as 

copyrighted material, is not placed on 

the internet and is publicly available 

only in hard copy form. Publicly 

available docket materials are available 

at https://www.regulations.gov, or 

please contact the person identified in 

the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT

section for additional availability 

information. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jeff 

Hunt at (206) 553–0256, or hunt.jeff@

epa.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Throughout this document wherever 

‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us,’’ or ‘‘our’’ is used, it is 

intended to refer to the EPA. 

I. Background Information 

On June 28, 2018, the EPA proposed 

to approve Washington as meeting the 

requirement that each SIP contain 

adequate provisions to prohibit 

emissions that will contribute 

significantly to nonattainment or 

interfere with maintenance of the 2012 

PM2.5 NAAQS in any other state (83 FR 

30380). An explanation of the Clean Air 

Act requirements, a detailed analysis of 

the submittal, and the EPA’s reasons for 

proposing approval were provided in 

the notice of proposed rulemaking, and 

will not be restated here. The public 

comment period for the proposal ended 

July 30, 2018. 

II. Response to Comments 

We received three comments on the 

rulemaking. After reviewing the 

comments, we have determined that the 

comments are outside the scope of our 

proposed action and fail to identify any 

material issue necessitating a response. 

For more information, please see our 

memorandum included in the docket for 

this action. 

III. Final Action 

The EPA is approving Washington’s 

February 7, 2018, submission certifying 

that the SIP is sufficient to meet the 

interstate transport requirements of 

Clean Air Act section 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I), 

specifically prongs one and two, as set 

forth in the proposed rulemaking for 

this action. 

IV. Statutory and Executive Order 

Reviews 

Under the Clean Air Act, the 

Administrator is required to approve a 

SIP submission that complies with the 

provisions of the Clean Air Act and 

applicable federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 

7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in 

reviewing SIP submissions, the EPA’s 

role is to approve state choices, 

provided that they meet the criteria of 

the Clean Air Act. Accordingly, this 

action merely approves state law as 

meeting federal requirements and does 


daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with RULES
42032 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 161 / Monday, August 20, 2018 / Rules and Regulations 

not impose additional requirements 

beyond those imposed by state law. For 

that reason, this action: 

• Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory 

action’’ subject to review by the Office 

of Management and Budget under 

Executive Orders 12866 (58 FR 51735, 

October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821, 

January 21, 2011); 

• Is not an Executive Order 13771 (82 

FR 9339, February 2, 2017) regulatory 

action because actions such as SIP 

approvals are exempted under 

Executive Order 12866; 

• Does not impose an information 

collection burden under the provisions 

of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 

U.S.C. 3501 et seq.); 

• Is certified as not having a 

significant economic impact on a 

substantial number of small entities 

under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 

U.S.C. 601 et seq.); 

• Does not contain any unfunded 

mandate or significantly or uniquely 

affect small governments, as described 

in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act 

of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4); 

• Does not have Federalism 

implications as specified in Executive 

Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 

1999); 

• Is not an economically significant 

regulatory action based on health or 

safety risks subject to Executive Order 

13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997); 

• Is not a significant regulatory action 

subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 

28355, May 22, 2001); 

• Is not subject to requirements of 

section 12(d) of the National 

Technology Transfer and Advancement 

Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because 

this action does not involve technical 

standards; and 

• Does not provide the EPA with the 

discretionary authority to address, as 

appropriate, disproportionate human 

health or environmental effects, using 

practicable and legally permissible 

methods, under Executive Order 12898 

(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994). 

The SIP is not approved to apply on 

any Indian reservation land and is also 

not approved to apply in any other area 

where the EPA or an Indian tribe has 

demonstrated that a tribe has 

jurisdiction. In those areas of Indian 

country, the rule does not have tribal 

implications as specified by Executive 

Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 

2000). 

The Congressional Review Act, 5 

U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small 

Business Regulatory Enforcement 

Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides 

that before a rule may take effect, the 

agency promulgating the rule must 

submit a rule report, which includes a 

copy of the rule, to each House of the 

Congress and to the Comptroller General 

of the United States. The EPA will 

submit a report containing this action 

and other required information to the 

U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of 

Representatives, and the Comptroller 

General of the United States prior to 

publication of the rule in the Federal 

Register. A major rule cannot take effect 

until 60 days after it is published in the 

Federal Register. This action is not a 

‘‘major rule’’ as defined by 5 U.S.C. 

804(2). 

Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean 

Air Act, petitions for judicial review of 

this action must be filed in the United 

States Court of Appeals for the 

appropriate circuit by October 19, 2018. 

Filing a petition for reconsideration by 

the Administrator of this final rule does 

not affect the finality of this action for 

the purposes of judicial review nor does 

it extend the time within which a 

petition for judicial review may be filed, 

and shall not postpone the effectiveness 

of such rule or action. This action may 

not be challenged later in proceedings to 

enforce its requirements (See section 

307(b)(2)). 

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52 

Environmental protection, Air 

pollution control, Carbon monoxide, 

Incorporation by reference, 

Intergovernmental relations, Lead, 

Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone, Particulate 

matter, Reporting and recordkeeping 

requirements, Sulfur oxides, Volatile 

organic compounds. 

Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq. 

Dated: August 7, 2018. 

Chris Hladick, 

Regional Administrator, Region 10. 

For the reasons set forth in the 

preamble, 40 CFR part 52 is amended as 

follows: 

PART 52—APPROVAL AND 

PROMULGATION OF 

IMPLEMENTATION PLANS 

■ 1. The authority citation for part 52 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq. 

Subpart WW—Washington 

■ 2. In § 52.2470, table 2 in paragraph 

(e) is amended by adding the entry 

‘‘Interstate Transport for the 2012 PM2.5

NAAQS’’ immediately below the entry 

‘‘Interstate Transport for the 2008 Ozone 

NAAQS’’ to read as follows: 

§ 52.2470 Identification of plan. 

* * * * * 

(e) * * * 

TABLE 2—ATTAINMENT, MAINTENANCE, AND OTHER PLANS

Name of SIP provision 

Applicable 

geographic or 

nonattainment 

area 

State 

submittal 

date 

EPA approval date Explanations 

*******

110(a)(2) Infrastructure and Interstate Transport 

*******

Interstate Transport for the 2012 

PM2.5 NAAQS.

Statewide ....... 2/7/2018 8/20/2018, [insert Federal Register citation].This action addresses CAA 

110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I). 

* * * * * * * 


daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 161 / Monday, August 20, 2018 / Rules and Regulations 42033 

[FR Doc. 2018–17823 Filed 8–17–18; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

40 CFR Part 52 

[EPA–R10–OAR–2018–0214, FRL–9982– 

59—Region 10] 

Air Plan Approval; ID, Incorporations 

by Reference Updates and Rule 

Revisions 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA). 

ACTION: Final rule. 

SUMMARY: EPA is taking final action to 

approve revisions to Idaho’s State 

Implementation Plan (SIP) submitted by 

the Idaho Department of Environmental 

Quality (IDEQ) on March 20, 2018 and 

April 12, 2018. The submitted revisions 

update incorporation by reference of 

Federal regulations in the Idaho’s rules. 

The revisions also remove an interim 

regulation that expired in 2003. 

DATES: This final rule is effective 

September 19, 2018. 

ADDRESSES: EPA has established a 

docket for this action under Docket ID 

No. EPA–R10–OAR–2018–0214, at 

http://www.regulations.gov. All 

documents in the docket are listed on 

the https://www.regulations.gov 

website. Although listed in the index, 

some information is not publicly 

available, e.g., CBI or other information 

whose disclosure is restricted by statute. 

Certain other material, such as 

copyrighted material, is not placed on 

the internet and will be publicly 

available only in hard copy form. 

Publicly available docket materials are 

available through https://

www.regulations.gov, or please contact 

the person identified in the FOR FURTHER

INFORMATION CONTACT section for 

additional availability information. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Randall Ruddick at (206) 553–1999, or 

ruddick.randall@epa.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Throughout this document, wherever 

‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us,’’ or ‘‘our’’ is used, it is 

intended to refer to EPA. 

Table of Contents 

I. Background 

II. Final Action 

III. Incorporation by Reference 

IV. Statutory and Executive Orders Review 

I. Background 

On March 20, 2018, the Idaho 

Department of Environmental Quality 

(IDEQ) submitted revisions to the SIP 

provisions that incorporate by reference 

(IBR) various portions of Federal 

regulations codified in the Code of 

Federal Regulations (CFR) into the Rules 

for the Control of Air Pollution in Idaho 

(IDAPA 58.01.01). Additionally, on 

April 12, 2018, Idaho submitted a 

separate SIP revision to remove an 

expired interim transportation 

conformity provision. 

On June 29, 2018, EPA proposed to 

approve Idaho’s March 20, 2018, and 

April 12, 2018, SIP submissions. Please 

see the proposed approval for further 

explanation (83 FR 30626). The public 

comment period for our proposed action 

ended July 30, 2018. We received three 

electronic comments submitted through 

https://www.regulations.gov. We 

reviewed the comments and have 

determined that they are not clearly 

related to the subject of this action and 

thus are not adverse to this action. 

Therefore, we are finalizing our action 

as proposed. 

II. Final Action 

EPA is approving, and incorporating 

by reference where appropriate, in 

Idaho’s SIP, all revisions to IDAPA 

58.01.01.107 Incorporations by 

Reference (state effective March 28, 

2018), except .03.f through .p, as 

requested by Idaho on March 20, 2018. 

EPA is also approving, as requested by 

Idaho on April 12, 2018, removal of 

IDAPA 58.01.01.582 Interim Conformity 

Provisions for Northern Ada County 

Former Nonattainment Area for PM 10 

from the Idaho SIP. We have determined 

that the submitted SIP revisions are 

consistent with section 110 and parts C 

and part D of Title I of the CAA. 

III. Incorporation by Reference 

In this rule, EPA is approving 

regulatory text that includes 

incorporation by reference. In 

accordance with requirements of 1 CFR 

51.5, EPA is incorporating by reference 

the provisions described above in 

Section II. Final Action and set forth 

below, as amendments to 40 CFR part 

52. 

Also in this rule, EPA is removing 

regulatory text that includes 

incorporation by reference. In 

accordance with requirements of 1 CFR 

51.5, EPA is removing the incorporation 

by reference of IDAPA 58.01.01.582 as 

described in Section II. Final Action and 

set forth below, as amendments to 40 

CFR part 52. 

EPA has made, and will continue to 

make, these documents generally 

available electronically through 

www.regulations.gov and at the EPA 

Region 10 office (please contact the 

person identified in the FOR FURTHER

INFORMATION CONTACT section of this 

preamble for more information). 

IV. Statutory and Executive Orders 

Review 

Under the Clean Air Act, the 

Administrator is required to approve a 

SIP submission that complies with the 

provisions of the Act and applicable 

Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 

40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in reviewing SIP 

submissions, the EPA’s role is to 

approve state choices, provided that 

they meet the criteria of the Clean Air 

Act. Accordingly, this action merely 

approves state law as meeting Federal 

requirements and does not impose 

additional requirements beyond those 

imposed by state law. For that reason, 

this action: 

• Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory 

action’’ subject to review by the Office 

of Management and Budget under 

Executive Orders 12866 (58 FR 51735, 

October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821, 

January 21, 2011); 

• is not an Executive Order 13771 (82 

FR 9339, February 2, 2017) regulatory 

action because SIP approvals are 

exempted under Executive Order 12866; 

• does not impose an information 

collection burden under the provisions 

of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 

U.S.C. 3501 et seq.); 

• is certified as not having a 

significant economic impact on a 

substantial number of small entities 

under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 

U.S.C. 601 et seq.); 

• does not contain any unfunded 

mandate or significantly or uniquely 

affect small governments, as described 

in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act 

of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4); 

• does not have Federalism 

implications as specified in Executive 

Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 

1999); 

• is not an economically significant 

regulatory action based on health or 

safety risks subject to Executive Order 

13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997); 

• is not a significant regulatory action 

subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 

28355, May 22, 2001); 

• is not subject to requirements of 

Section 12(d) of the National 

Technology Transfer and Advancement 

Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because 

it does not involve technical standards; 

and 

• does not provide the EPA with the 

discretionary authority to address, as 

appropriate, disproportionate human 

health or environmental effects, using 

practicable and legally permissible 

methods, under Executive Order 12898 

(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994). 


daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with RULES