Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 159 / Thursday, August 16, 2018 / Notices 40787 

Wayne County 

Dublin Friends Meeting House, 2352 W 

Maple St., Dublin, SG100002868 

Fountain City Historic District, Roughly 

bounded by Noland’s Fork, North, Hartley 

& Vine Sts., Fountain City, SG100002869 

MICHIGAN 

Calhoun County 

Old-Merchants National Bank and Trust Co. 

Building, 25 W Michigan Ave., Battle 

Creek, SG100002887 

OHIO 

Cuyahoga County 

Astrup Company Building, The, 2397 W 25th 

St., Cleveland, SG100002875 

Darke County 

Knights of Pythias Hall, 118 E Washington 

St., New Madison, SG100002876 

Franklin County 

Hartman Hotel, 275 S 4th & 150 E Main Sts., 

Columbus, SG100002877 

Hamilton County 

Provident Savings Bank and Trust Co., 630– 

632 Vine St., Cincinnati, SG100002878 

Hancock County 

Boss Manufacturing Company, The, 317 W 

Main Cross St., Findlay, SG100002879 

Stark County 

Lavin, Carl and Audrey, House, 5240 Plain 

Center Ave. NE, Canton, SG100002880 

Summit County 

Cuyahoga Falls Downtown Historic District, 

111–245 Portage Trail, 138 Stowe Ave., 

2035 Oldetown Loop, 2091–2250 Front, 

2044–2220 2nd & 2055–2253 3rd Sts., 

Cuyahoga Falls, SG100002881 

OKLAHOMA 

Caddo County 

Rock Island Passenger Station, 301 E Main 

St., Anadarko, SG100002874 

Cleveland County 

Southridge Addition Historic District, 

Roughly bounded by Classen Blvd., 

Oklahoma & S Ponca Aves., E Boyd, Macy 

& Okmulgee Sts., Norman, SG100002882 

VIRGINIA 

Alexandria Independent City 

Oakland Baptist Cemetery, 4195 W Braddock 

Rd., Alexandria, SG100002883 

Petersburg Independent City 

Halifax Triangle and Downtown Commercial 

Historic District, Generally bounded by 

Washington, Adams, Sycamore, Halifax, 

Byrne & Harrison Sts., Petersburg, 

SG100002886 

WISCONSIN 

Sheboygan County 

Badger State Tanning Company, 1031 

Maryland Ave., Sheboygan, SG100002888 

A request for removal has been made for 

the following resource: 

OKLAHOMA 

Cleveland County 

DeBarr Historic District, 

Roughly bounded by Boyd St., DeBarr Ave., 

Duffy St. and the A T & S F RR tracks 

Norman, OT91001904 

A request to move has been received for 

the following resource: 

VIRGINIA 

Charlottesville Independent City 

Wyndhurst (Charlottesville MRA), 605 

Preston Pl., Charlottesville, MV82001816 

Authority: Section 60.13 of 36 CFR part 60. 

Dated: July 27, 2018. 

Julie H. Ernstein, 

Acting Chief, National Register of Historic 

Places/National Historic Landmarks Program 

and Deputy Keeper of the National Register 

of Historic Places. 

[FR Doc. 2018–17665 Filed 8–15–18; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4312–52–P 

INTERNATIONAL TRADE 

COMMISSION 

[Inv. No. 337–TA–1127] 

Certain Microperforated Packaging 

Containing Fresh Produce (II); 

Institution of Investigation 

AGENCY: U.S. International Trade 

Commission. 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that a 

complaint was filed with the U.S. 

International Trade Commission on July 

12, 2018, under section 337 of the Tariff 

Act of 1930, as amended, on behalf of 

Windham Packaging, LLC of Windham, 

New Hampshire. A letter supplementing 

the complaint was filed on August 2, 

2018. The complaint alleges violations 

of section 337 based upon the 

importation into the United States, the 

sale for importation, and the sale within 

the United States after importation of 

certain microperforated packaging 

containing fresh produce (II) by reason 

of infringement of certain claims of U.S. 

Patent No. 7,083,837 (‘‘the ’837 patent’’). 

The complaint further alleges that an 

industry in the United States exists as 

required by the applicable Federal 

Statute. 

The complainant requests that the 

Commission institute an investigation 

and, after the investigation, issue a 

limited exclusion order and cease and 

desist orders. 

ADDRESSES: The complaint, except for 

any confidential information contained 

therein, is available for inspection 

during official business hours (8:45 a.m. 

to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the 

Secretary, U.S. International Trade 

Commission, 500 E Street SW, Room 

112, Washington, DC 20436, telephone 

(202) 205–2000. Hearing impaired 

individuals are advised that information 

on this matter can be obtained by 

contacting the Commission’s TDD 

terminal on (202) 205–1810. Persons 

with mobility impairments who will 

need special assistance in gaining access 

to the Commission should contact the 

Office of the Secretary at (202) 205– 

2000. General information concerning 

the Commission may also be obtained 

by accessing its internet server at 

https://www.usitc.gov. The public 

record for this investigation may be 

viewed on the Commission’s electronic 

docket (EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Katherine Hiner. The Office of Docket 

Services, U.S. International Trade 

Commission, telephone (202) 205–1802. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Authority: The authority for 

institution of this investigation is 

contained in section 337 of the Tariff 

Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. 

1337, and in section 210.10 of the 

Commission’s Rules of Practice and 

Procedure, 19 CFR 210.10 (2018). 

Scope of Investigation: Having 

considered the complaint, the U.S. 

International Trade Commission, on 

August 9, 2018, ORDERED THAT— 

(1) Pursuant to subsection (b) of 

section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as 

amended, an investigation be instituted 

to determine whether there is a 

violation of subsection (a)(1)(B) of 

section 337 in the importation into the 

United States, the sale for importation, 

or the sale within the United States after 

importation of certain products 

identified in paragraph (2) by reason of 

infringement of one or more of claims 

1–6, 11, and 13 of the ’837 patent; and 

whether an industry in the United 

States exists as required by subsection 

(a)(2) of section 337; 

(2) Pursuant to section 210.10(b)(1) of 

the Commission’s Rules of Practice and 

Procedure, 19 CFR 210.10(b)(1), the 

plain language description of the 

accused products or category of accused 

products, which defines the scope of the 

investigation, is ‘‘bags for fresh produce 

and bags containing fresh produce. The 

bags contain microperforations that are 

specifically designed and arranged to 

increase the shelf-life of fresh produce 

by affecting the mixture of gases within 

the bag’’; 

(3) For the purpose of the 

investigation so instituted, the following 

are hereby named as parties upon which 

this notice of investigation shall be 

served: 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES
40788 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 159 / Thursday, August 16, 2018 / Notices 

(a) The complainant is: Windham 

Packaging, LLC, 18 Wilson Rd, 

Windham, NH 03087. 

(b) The respondents are the following 

entities alleged to be in violation of 

section 337, and are the parties upon 

which the complaint is to be served: 

Growers Express, LLC, 150 Main St., 

Suite 210, Salinas, CA 93901. 

C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc., 14701 

Charlson Road, Eden Prairie, MN 

55347. 

(4) For the investigation so instituted, 

the Chief Administrative Law Judge, 

U.S. International Trade Commission, 

shall designate the presiding 

Administrative Law Judge. 

Responses to the complaint and the 

notice of investigation must be 

submitted by the named respondents in 

accordance with section 210.13 of the 

Commission’s Rules of Practice and 

Procedure, 19 CFR 210.13. Pursuant to 

19 CFR 201.16(e) and 210.13(a), such 

responses will be considered by the 

Commission if received not later than 20 

days after the date of service by the 

Commission of the complaint and the 

notice of investigation. Extensions of 

time for submitting responses to the 

complaint and the notice of 

investigation will not be granted unless 

good cause therefor is shown. 

Failure of a respondent to file a timely 

response to each allegation in the 

complaint and in this notice may be 

deemed to constitute a waiver of the 

right to appear and contest the 

allegations of the complaint and this 

notice, and to authorize the 

administrative law judge and the 

Commission, without further notice to 

the respondent, to find the facts to be as 

alleged in the complaint and this notice 

and to enter an initial determination 

and a final determination containing 

such findings, and may result in the 

issuance of an exclusion order or a cease 

and desist order or both directed against 

the respondent. 

By order of the Commission. 

Issued: August 13, 2018. 

William R. Bishop, 

Supervisory Hearings and Information 

Officer. 

[FR Doc. 2018–17686 Filed 8–15–18; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7020–02–P 

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 

Notice of Extension of Public 

Comment Period for Consent Decree 

Under the Comprehensive 

Environmental Response, 

Compensation, and Liability Act 

On May 16, 2018, the Department of 

Justice (DOJ) lodged a proposed consent 

decree with the United States District 

Court for the Southern District of 

Georgia in the lawsuit entitled United 

States v. Hercules LLC, Civil Action No. 

2:18–cv–00062–LGW–RSB. To allow for 

additional community input and 

feedback, DOJ is extending the public 

comment period for an additional thirty 

(30) days. 

The proposed consent decree would 

require defendant Hercules LLC to 

implement the interim remedy selected 

by the U.S. Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA) for the outfall, known as 

Operable Unit 1, of the Terry Creek 

Dredge Spoil Areas/Hercules Outfall 

Site (‘‘Site’’) in Brunswick, in Glynn 

County, Georgia. The consent decree 

would also require the defendant to 

reimburse EPA $153,009.48 in past 

response costs at the Site, and to pay 

future response costs incurred by the 

United States in connection with this 

consent decree. Notice of the lodging of 

the decree was originally published in 

the Federal Register on May 23, 2018. 

See 83 FR 23937 (May 23, 2018). The 

publication of the original notice 

opened a thirty (30) day period for 

public comment on the Decree. At the 

request of some members of the public, 

the comment period was then extended 

by 60 days, to August 21, 2018. See 83 

FR 27799 (June 14, 2018). The 

publication of the present notice 

extends the period for public comment 

on the Decree to September 20, 2018. 

Comments concerning the consent 

decree should be addressed to the 

Assistant Attorney General, 

Environment and Natural Resources 

Division, and should refer to United 

States v. Hercules, LLC, D.J. Ref. No. 90– 

11–3–11685. All comments must be 

submitted no later than September 20, 

2018. Comments may be submitted 

either by email or by mail: 

To submit 

comments: Send them to: 

By email ....... pubcomment-ees.enrd@

usdoj.gov. 

By mail ......... Assistant Attorney General, 

U.S. DOJ—ENRD, P.O. 

Box 7611, Washington, DC 

20044–7611. 

During the public comment period, 

the consent decree may be examined 

and downloaded at this Justice 

Department website: https://

www.justice.gov/enrd/consent-decrees. 

We will provide a paper copy of the 

consent decree upon written request 

and payment of reproduction costs. 

Please mail your request and payment 

to: Consent Decree Library, U.S. DOJ— 

ENRD, P.O. Box 7611, Washington, DC 

20044–7611. 

Please enclose a check or money order 

for $146.25 (25 cents per page 

reproduction cost) payable to the United 

States Treasury. For a paper copy 

without the exhibits and signature 

pages, the cost is $17.25. 

Henry S. Friedman, 

Assistant Section Chief, Environmental 

Enforcement Section, Environment and 

Natural Resources Division. 

[FR Doc. 2018–17680 Filed 8–15–18; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4410–15–P 

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 

Notice of Lodging of Proposed 

Consent Decree Under the Clean Air 

Act 

On August 10, 2018, the Department 

of Justice lodged a proposed consent 

decree with the United States District 

Court for the Southern District of 

Illinois in the lawsuit entitled United 

States and Illinois v. WRB Refining LP, 

et al., Civil Action No. 3:18–cv–01484. 

In the complaint filed 

contemporaneously with the proposed 

consent decree, the United States and 

Illinois alleged that defendants WRB 

Refining LP and Phillips 66 Company 

(‘‘WRB/P66’’) violated various 

provisions of the Clean Air Act and the 

Illinois Environmental Protection Act at 

a refinery owned and operated by 

defendants in Roxana and Hartford, 

Illinois (‘‘Wood River Refinery’’). The 

complaint sought injunctive relief and 

civil penalties. Under the proposed 

consent decree, WRB/P66 will 

implement a flare minimization and 

flare efficiency program to reduce 

emissions of volatile organic 

compounds; undertake a variety to 

practices to reduce pollution from 

valves and pumps; limit benzene 

emissions from wastewater management 

units; and develop and implement an 

operation and maintenance plan to 

improve the operation of the continuous 

emissions monitoring systems at the 

Wood River Refinery. As mitigation for 

past excess emissions, WRB/P66, among 

other things, will install a new vacuum 

truck unloading facility; set up 

monitoring devices around its 

wastewater treatment plant; and use low 

emissions valves when it has to replace 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES