alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### John L. STARKEY, Sr., as Administrator of the Estate of John L. Starkey, Jr., Deceased, Appellant, v. Billie F. CHEW, as Executrix of the Estate of Robert G. Chew, Deceased, Appellee.

No. 70-261.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Dec. 15, 1970.

*871Julius H. Erstling, So. Miami, and R. M. MacArthur, Miami, for appellant.

Patton, Kanner, Tietig & Segal and Donald W. Stobs, Jr., Miami, for appellee.

Before PEARSON, C. J., and HENDRY and SWANN, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

The appellant, who was plaintiff in the trial court, appeals a final judgment entered pursuant to a jury verdict for the defendant. The first assignment of error is that the court erred in admitting into evidence defendant’s exhibit. The brief does not argue this assignment of error; it is therefore abandoned.

The second assignment of error is that the court erred in denying plaintiff’s motion for a directed verdict made at the close of all of the evidence. A review of the record convinces us that jury issues were presented in this cause.

By leave of court the appellant amended his assignments of error and added assignments three, four and five. Assignment three urges that the court erred in its charges to the jury. The record affirmatively shows that the appellant did not object to the instruction given; therefore the assignment directed to the instruction may not now be considered. Rule 1.470(b) RCP, 30 F.S.A. Appellant’s assignment four is insufficient. Municipal Court In and For Coral Gables v. Giblin, Fla.App.1961, 126 So.2d 285; Gregg v. State Road Department, Fla.App.1962, 140 So.2d 328. Appellant’s fifth assignment of error claims the court erred in the denial of post-trial motions. We have examined the record in the light of this assignment and the points raised on appeal and find that no error has been demonstrated.

Affirmed.
Exhibit
32.1











Certification
of CEO Pursuant to


18 U.S.C.
Section 1350,


As
Adopted Pursuant to


Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Zhong Wen International Holding Co.,
Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2010 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), Sun Hongyi, Chief Executive Officer and chief Financial Officer of
the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of his
knowledge, that:





(1)           The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)           The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.











/s/
      Sun HongyiChief
      Executive Officer and Chief Financial OfficerNovember
      16, 2010








This
certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for
purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended.





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
Zhong Wen International Holding Co., Inc. and will be retained by Zhong Wen
International Holding Co., Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
# C_2013014EN.01000301.xml

| 17.1.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 14/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.1.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 14/3

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

16 January 2013

2013/C 14/03

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,3277 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 117,06 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4624 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,83010 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 8,6341 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,2359 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 7,4200 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 25,580 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 294,99 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,6976 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,1312 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,3388 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,3500 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,2593 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,3102 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 10,2934 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,5826 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,6254 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 406,90 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 11,7330 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 8,2552 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,5605 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 12 820,16 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,0090 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 53,989 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 40,3750 |
| THB | Thai baht | 39,645 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 2,7082 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 16,8084 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 72,8040 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,3277

JPY

Japanese yen

117,06

DKK

Danish krone

7,4624

GBP

Pound sterling

0,83010

SEK

Swedish krona

8,6341

CHF

Swiss franc

1,2359

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

7,4200

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

25,580

HUF

Hungarian forint

294,99

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,6976

PLN

Polish zloty

4,1312

RON

Romanian leu

4,3388

TRY

Turkish lira

2,3500

AUD

Australian dollar

1,2593

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,3102

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

10,2934

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,5826

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,6254

KRW

South Korean won

1 406,90

ZAR

South African rand

11,7330

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

8,2552

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,5605

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

12 820,16

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,0090

PHP

Philippine peso

53,989

RUB

Russian rouble

40,3750

THB

Thai baht

39,645

BRL

Brazilian real

2,7082

MXN

Mexican peso

16,8084

INR

Indian rupee

72,8040

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
Exhibit 10.24


 


 







  



- 1 -










 





 



- 2 -










 





 



- 3 -










 





 



- 4 -










 





 



- 5 -










 





 



- 6 -










 





 



- 7 -










 





 



- 8 -










 





 



- 9 -










 





 



- 10 -
The attachments to this docket item are the redline /strikeout (rlso) versions of the amended rules.

Subpart A Subpart C Subpart E Subpart F Subpart G Subpart I Subpart N Subpart O Subpart P Subpart Q Subpart S Subpart U Subpart V Subpart X Subpart Y Subpart Z Subpart AA Subpart CC Subpart DD Subpart FF Subpart HH Subpart II Subpart LL Subpart MM Subpart NN Subpart OO Subpart PP Subpart RR Subpart TT Subpart UU
#### Marcia H. SMITH, Petitioner, v. NATIONAL AIRLINES, INC, and the Industrial Relations Commission, Respondents.

No. 43545.

Supreme Court of Florida.

May 22, 1973.

Certiorari denied.

CARLTON, C. J., and ADKINS, BOYD, McCAIN and DEKLE, JJ., concur.
<PAGE>

                                                                EXHIBIT 23.2

INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

We consent to the incorporation by reference in this Registration Statement
of Interspeed, Inc. on Form S-8 of our report dated October 21, 1999,
appearing in the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Interspeed, Inc. for the year
ended September 30, 1999.


/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP
Boston, Massachusetts

August 23, 2000
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 3687

To cancel the Space Station program.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

NOVEMBER 22, 1993

Mr. ROEMER (for himself, Mrs. MALONEY, Mr. PENNY, Mr. BARRETT of Wisconsin, Mr. FRANK of Massachusetts, Mr. SHAYS, Mr. RAMSTAD, Mr.

POMEROY, Mr. HOEKSTRA, Mr. MEEHAN, Mr. STRICKLAND, Mr. DURBIN, Mr. VENTO, Mr. BARCA of Wisconsin, Mr. ANDREWS of Maine, Mr.

POSHARD, Ms. DANNER, Mrs. ROUKEMA, Mr. KLEIN, Mr. LAROCCO, Mr.

DEFAZIO, Mr. CONYERS, Mr. KLECZKA, Mr. HUGHES, Mr. SCHUMER,

Mr. PORTER, Mr. PAYNE of New Jersey, Mr. SHARP, and Mr. HASTERT)

introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on

Science, Space, and Technology

A BILL

To cancel the Space Station program.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. CANCELLATION.

4 The Space Station program is hereby cancelled.

5 SEC. 2. REPORT ON TERMINATION COSTS.

6 Within 1 month after the date of enactment of this

7 Act, the Administrator of the National Aeronautics and

8 Space Administration shall submit to the Congress a re-
2

•HR 3687 IH

1 port itemizing the funding required for carrying out the

2 cancellation of the Space Station program. Such report

3 shall include details of the purposes for which such funds

4 are needed, and any requests for funding in addition to

5 amounts authorized by this Act that may be required.

6 SEC. 3. REPORT ON TOTAL SPACE STATION COSTS.

7 Within 1 year after the date of enactment of this Act,

8 the Administrator of the National Aeronautics and Space

9 Administration shall submit to the Congress a report de10 tailing all Federal expenditures relating to the Space Sta11 tion from October 1, 1982, through the final cancellation

12 of the program.

13 SEC. 4. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.

14 There are authorized to be appropriated to the Ad15 ministrator of the National Aeronautics and Space Admin16 istration $500,000,000 for costs associated with carrying

17 out section 1 of this Act.

Æ
# A p p e n d i x F



# D r a f t C o m p a n y A n n u a l R e p o r t : S u m m a r y o f

R e d u c t i o n s i n E m i s s i o n s a n d P r o d u c t C o n t e n t

O c t o b e r 2 0 1 2

N O N C B I2010/15PFOAGlobalStewardshipProgramDraftCompanyReport:SummaryofReductionsinEmissionsandProductContentSECTION1:REPORTDATEOctober2012SECTION2:COMPANYIDENTIFICATIONCompanyNameSOLVAYSOLEXIS,INC.2aStreetAddress10LEONARDLANETHOROFARE,NJ08086SECTION3:SUMMARYOFEMISSIONSReportingPeriod(usecalendaryear-e.g.Jan1,2005toDec31,2005)Jan1,2011–Dec31,2011ReleasestoallenvironmentalmediafromfluoropolymerandtelomermanufactureOperationsChemicalcategoryKgs1mersfluoropolyofkgscategoryofkgstelomersofkgscategoryofkgs%ReductionoftotalkgsreleasedfrombaselineyearPFOA,PFOAsaltsandhigherhomologuesZEROZERONA100%3aU.S.facilitiesPrecursorsNAPFOA,PFOAsaltsandhigherhomologuesNA3bNon-U.S.facilitiesPrecursorsNAPleaseprovideinformationonthemethods,assumptions,uncertaintiesanddetectionlimitsforthedataprovidedabove.3cSECTION4:SUMMARYOFPRODUCTCONTENTReportingPeriod(usecalendaryear-e.g.Jan1,2005toDec31,2005)Jan1,2011toDec31,2011ProducttypeFluoropolymerdispersionsOtherfluoropolymers1Telomerbasedproducts4aProductionvolume(kgs/year)2>1,000,000>1,000,000NAConcentration3%ReductionfrombaselineyearOperationsChemicalcategoryFluoropolymerdispersions4(ppmwetweight)Otherfluoropolymers1,5(ppbdryweight)Telomerbasedproducts6(ppbdryweight)FluoropolymerdispersionsOtherfluoropolymers1TelomerbasedproductsPFOA,PFOAsaltsandhigherhomologues<10ppm<5ppm99%99%NA4bU.S.facilitiesPrecursorsPFOA,PFOAsaltsandhigherhomologues4cNon-U.S.facilitiesPrecursorsPleaseprovideinformationonthemethods,assumptions,uncertaintiesanddetectionlimitsforthedataprovidedabove.4d1FluoropolymersmanufacturedwithPFOAorrelatedchemicals.2Usethefollowingranges:(1)Zero(2)>0–10kgs;(3)>10kgs–100kgs;(4)>100kgs–1,000kgs;(5)>1,000kgs–10,000kgs;(6)>10,000kgs–100,000kgs;(7)>100,000kgs–1,000,000kgs;(8)Over1,000,000kgs.3Concentrationshouldreflecttheconcentrationofchemicalintheproductassoldbythereportingcompany.Ifthereportingcompanyhasinformationconcerningtheconcentrationofchemicalintheproductasusedbyothers–forexample,asincorporatedbydilutionintoaformulation–thatadditionalinformationwouldalsobehelpful.4Thisvalueshouldbeexpressedasaweightedaverageconcentrationandrange.5Thisvalueshouldbeexpressedasamaximumconcentration.6Thisvalueshouldbeexpressedasasimple(notweighted)averageandrange.
#### Arthur BALABAN, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 71-1217.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Feb. 21, 1973.

Melvyn Kessler, Miami, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., and Arnold R. Ginsberg, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

Before BARKDULL, C. J., and PEARSON and CHARLES CARROLL, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. Cornelius v. State, Fla.1950, 49 So.2d 332; Redditt v. State, Fla.1955, 84 So.2d 317; Eizenman v. State, Fla.App.1961, 132 So.2d 763; Robertson v. State, Fla.App.1971, 245 So.2d 304; Marlin v. State, Fla.App.1972, 268 So.2d 548. See also: DiPietro v. State, Fla.App.1972, 264 So.2d 27.
#### Ethel Di PRIME, Appellant, v. Joseph FILECCI, Appellee.

No. 72-158.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

July 3, 1973.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
EXHIBIT 32.2





CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER





PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)





In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2019 (the “Report”) of New Mountain Finance Corporation (the “Registrant”), as filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Shiraz Y. Kajee, the Chief Financial Officer of the Registrant, hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge, that:





|    |                                                                                                                                  
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

|    |                                                                                                                                                        
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.




/s/ SHIRAZ Y. KAJEEName:Shiraz Y. KajeeDate:May 6, 2019
#### Vernon DOKKEN, Petitioner, v. MINNESOTA-OHIO OIL CORPORATION, etc., et al., Respondents.

No. 39638.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Oct. 7, 1970.

Certiorari denied. 232 So.2d 200.

DREW, Acting C. J., and THORNAL, CARLTON, ADKINS and BOYD, JJ., concur.
#### Robert Lawrence GREENWOOD v. PURDY, as Sheriff.

No. 37245.

Supreme Court of Florida.

April 1968.

Certiorari denied without opinion. 208 So.2d *277.*
# C_2015153EN.01000701.xml

| 8.5.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 153/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.5.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 153/7

---

Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union

Cases where the Commission raises no objections

(Text with EEA relevance, except for products falling under Annex I of the Treaty)

(2015/C 153/02)

| Date of adoption of the decision | 16.03.2015 |
| --- | --- |
| Aid number | SA.38876 (2014/N) |
| Member State | Italy |
| Region | MARCHE | Mixed |
| Title (and/or name of the beneficiary) | Carnj Società Cooperativa Agricola |
| Legal basis | Legge 23 dicembre 1996, n. 662 — articolo 2, comma 132.
  Legge 19 dicembre 1983, n. 700 — articolo 3, come modificata dalla
  Legge 2 dicembre 2005, n. 248 — articolo 10-ter.
  Deliberazione n. 65/2009 del CIPE del 31 luglio 2009 |
| Type of measure | Individual aid | Carnj Coop |
| Objective | Risk capital, Investment in processing and marketing |
| Form of aid | Provision of risk capital |
| Budget | Overall budget: EUR 10 (in millions) |
| Intensity | Measure does not constitute aid |
| Duration (period) | 19.03.2015 — 19.03.2025 |
| Economic sectors | Processing and preserving of meat and production of meat products |
| Name and address of the granting authority | ISA S.p.A. |
| Via Palestro, 64 00185 Roma |

Date of adoption of the decision

16.03.2015

Aid number

SA.38876 (2014/N)

Member State

Italy

Region

MARCHE

Mixed

Title (and/or name of the beneficiary)

Carnj Società Cooperativa Agricola

Legal basis

Legge 23 dicembre 1996, n. 662 — articolo 2, comma 132.

Legge 19 dicembre 1983, n. 700 — articolo 3, come modificata dalla

Legge 2 dicembre 2005, n. 248 — articolo 10-ter.

Deliberazione n. 65/2009 del CIPE del 31 luglio 2009

Type of measure

Individual aid

Carnj Coop

Objective

Risk capital, Investment in processing and marketing

Form of aid

Provision of risk capital

Budget

Overall budget: EUR 10 (in millions)

Intensity

Measure does not constitute aid

Duration (period)

19.03.2015 — 19.03.2025

Economic sectors

Processing and preserving of meat and production of meat products

Name and address of the granting authority

ISA S.p.A.

Via Palestro, 64 00185 Roma

Other information

—

The authentic text(s) of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found at:

http://ec.europa.eu/competition/elojade/isef/index.cfm

---
# C_2014362EN.01001201.xml

| 14.10.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 362/12 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.10.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 362/12

---

Information communicated by Member States regarding closure of fisheries

2014/C 362/10

In accordance with Article 35(3) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1224/2009 of 20 November 2009 establishing a Community control system for ensuring compliance with the rules of the common fisheries policy (1), a decision has been taken to close the fishery as set down in the following table:

1

| Date and time of closure | 13.9.2014 |
| --- | --- |
| Duration | 13.9.2014-31.12.2014 |
| Member State | Belgium |
| Stock or Group of stocks | SRX/89-C. |
| Species | Skates and rays (Rajiformes) |
| Zone | Union waters of VIII and IX |
| Type(s) of fishing vessels | — |
| Reference number | 47/TQ43 |

Date and time of closure

13.9.2014

Duration

13.9.2014-31.12.2014

Member State

Belgium

Stock or Group of stocks

SRX/89-C.

Species

Skates and rays (Rajiformes)

Rajiformes

Zone

Union waters of VIII and IX

Type(s) of fishing vessels

—

Reference number

47/TQ43

---

(1)  OJ L 343, 22.12.2009, p. 1.

1

---
<PAGE>

                       SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                             Washington, D.C. 20549


                                    FORM 8-K


                                 CURRENT REPORT


                       PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF
                       THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934


Date of Report (date of earliest event reported):  September 18, 2000

                              OXBORO MEDICAL, INC.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
             (Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)


           Minnesota                    0-18785                 41-1391803
-------------------------------   --------------------    ---------------------
(State or other jurisdiction          (Commission           (I.R.S. Employer
    of incorporation)                 File Number)         Identification No.)


13828 Lincoln Street NE
Ham Lake, Minnesota                                            55304
-----------------------------                            -------------------
(Address of principal executive offices)                     (Zip Code)


Registrant's telephone number, including area code: (763) 755-9516


<PAGE>

Items 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 7 and 8 are not applicable and therefore omitted.

ITEM 5.   OTHER EVENTS.

         Matt Bellin has resigned, effective September 18, 2000 as the
President of the Registrant. Mr. Kenneth Brimmer will be serving as the
interim Chief Executive Officer of the Registrant until a successor to Mr.
Bellin is appointed. John Sayer has resigned, effective September 30, 2000,
from the Board of Directors of the Registrant.

                                       2
<PAGE>

                                    SIGNATURE

          Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf
by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

                                      OXBORO MEDICAL, INC.

                                      By   /s/  Linda Erickson
                                           -----------------------------------
                                                 Linda Erickson
                                                 Its Chief Financial Officer


Dated:   September 21, 2000


                                       3
<PAGE>

                       SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                             WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

                           --------------------------

                                    FORM 8-K


                                 CURRENT REPORT
                     PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
                             SECURITIES ACT OF 1934


                                 AUGUST 31, 2000
                Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported)


                           DELTA BEVERAGE GROUP, INC.
               (Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Charter)

              DELAWARE                  _________                75-2048317
  (State or Other Jurisdiction of      (Commission             (IRS Employer
           Incorporation)              File Number)          Identification No.)



                               2221 DEMOCRAT ROAD
                            MEMPHIS, TENNESSEE 38132
          (Address of Principal Executive Offices, including Zip Code)


                                 (901) 344-7100
              (Registrant's Telephone Number, including Area Code)

<PAGE>

ITEM 5.  OTHER EVENTS.

         Delta Beverage Group, Inc. is a subsidiary of PepsiAmericas, Inc.

         Whitman Corporation and PepsiAmericas announced that a purported
         class action lawsuit has been filed in the Court of Chancery of
         Delaware with respect to the proposed merger of PepsiAmericas and
         Whitman Corporation. The complaint, which was filed by a purported
         stockholder of PepsiAmericas, names PepsiAmericas, the directors of
         PepsiAmericas, Dakota Holdings, LLC, and Whitman Corporation as
         defendants.

         The complaint alleges that the consideration to be paid to the
         public shareholders of PepsiAmericas in the merger is unfair and
         inadequate and that the transaction serves the interests of PepsiCo
         to the detriment of PepsiAmericas' minority public shareholders.
         The plaintiff seeks, among other things, class action
         certification, a preliminary and permanent injunction against
         consummation of the proposed merger, and rescission or damages
         should the transaction be consummated.

         Whitman Corporation and PepsiAmericas believe that the allegations
         contained in the complaint are without merit and intend to
         vigorously defend the action.


                                           2


<PAGE>

                                   SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended,
the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned hereunto duly authorized.

Date:  September 7, 2000                  Delta Beverage Group, Inc.


                                        By:   /s/ John F. Bierbaum
                                           ---------------------------------
                                              John F. Bierbaum
                                              Chief Financial Officer



                                             3
#### Edward WILSON, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 67-73.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Third District.

Aug. 7, 1967.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed.