alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FORM 10-QSB
FOR THE PERIOD ENDED JULY 31, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          APR-30-2001
<PERIOD-START>                             MAY-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUL-31-2000
<CASH>                                           2,059
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,170
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                        378
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 4,603
<PP&E>                                             569
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   8,715
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            1,284
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                      2,275
<COMMON>                                         7,471
<OTHER-SE>                                     (2,315)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     8,715
<SALES>                                          2,036
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 2,036
<CGS>                                            1,522
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    1,522
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 1,507
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  16
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (841)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         1
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (842)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (842)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.11)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.11)


</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3451 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3451

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide a cost-of-living 
   adjustment for the thresholds used in determining the 85 percent 
 inclusion of social security and tier 1 railroad retirement benefits.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            November 4, 1993

 Mr. Kleczka introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide a cost-of-living 
   adjustment for the thresholds used in determining the 85 percent 
 inclusion of social security and tier 1 railroad retirement benefits.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Social Security Equity Act of 
1993''.

SEC. 2. COST-OF-LIVING ADJUSTMENT IN THRESHOLDS USED IN DETERMINING THE 
              85 PERCENT INCLUSION OF SOCIAL SECURITY AND TIER 1 
              RAILROAD RETIREMENT BENEFITS.

    Subsection (c) of section 86 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 
(relating to social security and tier 1 railroad retirement benefits) 
is amended by adding at the end thereof the following new paragraph:
            ``(3) Cost-of-living adjustment.--In the case of any 
        taxable year beginning in a calendar year after 1994, each 
        dollar amount contained in paragraph (2) shall be increased by 
        an amount equal to--
                    ``(A) such dollar amount, multiplied by
                    ``(B) the cost-of-living adjustment determined 
                under section 1(f)(3) for the calendar year in which 
                the taxable year begins, by substituting `calendar year 
                1993' for `calendar year 1992' in subparagraph (B) 
                thereof.
        If any increase determined under the preceding sentence is not 
        a multiple of $100, such increase shall be rounded to the 
        nearest multiple of $100.''

                                 <all>
```
#### Robert S. CRAIG, Jr., Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 2584.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Fourth District.

March 26, 1969.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Indian River County; C. Pfeiffer Trowbridge, Judge.

Appeal dismissed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED>
<CIK> 0000032870
<NAME> QUIXOTE CORPORATION

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                       1,524,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               21,165,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                   955,000
<INVENTORY>                                 10,072,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            34,319,000
<PP&E>                                      27,930,000
<DEPRECIATION>                              12,929,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              73,264,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       12,192,000
<BONDS>                                     15,596,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       153,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  42,963,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                73,264,000
<SALES>                                     83,770,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            83,770,000
<CGS>                                       42,659,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               42,659,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            25,822,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             932,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             14,385,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                 5,466,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          8,919,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 8,919,000
<EPS-BASIC>                                       1.13
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.10


</TABLE>
# Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas June 14, 2021 No. 04-21-00181-CV Robert CORLEY , Appellant
v. Timothy CORLEY , Jason Corley and Century Oaks Land LLC, Appellees From the 45th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2017CI02547 Honorable Norma Gonzales, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R On May 10, 2021, petitioner filed a petition for permissive appeal. On June 10, 2021, petitioner filed a letter with this court requesting clarification regarding deadlines. It is ORDEREDthat all appellate filing deadlines are ABATEDpending further orders from this court.

_________________________________ Rebeca C. Martinez, Chief Justice IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 14th day of June, 2021.

___________________________________ MICHAEL A. CRUZ, Clerk of Court
|  | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|  | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date: August 10, 2015    |   |
|--------------------------|--------|
|                     |   |
|  /s/ Kevin Landis   |   |
| Kevin Landis             |   |
| Chief Executive Officer  |   |
|                     |   |
|  /s/ Omar Billawala |   |
| Omar Billawala           |   |
| Chief Financial Officer  |   |
#### Ronnie EICHELBERGER v. STATE of Mississippi.

No. 47650.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

Feb. 4, 1974.

Clayton Taylor Lewis, Philadelphia, for appellant.

A. F. Summer, Atty. Gen., by John C. Underwood, Jr., Sp. Asst. Atty. Gen., Jackson, for appellee.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Neshoba County; O. H. Barnett, Judge.

Before RODGERS, P. J., and PATTERSON, INZER, SMITH and SUGG, JJ-

Affirmed.
Frankly
Co.


333
Bryant Street, Suite 240


San
Francisco, CA 94107


 


 


Dated
as of August 15, 2016


 


Steven
Chung


3921
Durand Drive


San
Mateo, CA 94403


 


Re:       Amendment
of Employment Agreement


 


Dear
Steve,


 


Reference
is made to the Employment Agreement between you (“Employee”) and Frankly Co. (Company”) dated 3/23/2015 (the
“Agreement”). In exchange for consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, when signed
below, the Agreement will be further amended as follows:


 


Salary
Adjustment – For the period commencing on August 16, 2016 and ending on December 31, 2016, the salary payable to Employee
under the Agreement will be reduced from the annual rate of $360,000.00 to the annual rate of $226,667.00. Commencing on January
1, 2017, Employee’s salary rate will return to the $360,000.00 annual rate. The foregoing reduction in salary will not be
factored into the calculation of any bonus for which Employee may be eligible.


 


Except
as amended herein, the Agreement will continue in full force and effect.


 


If
the foregoing is acceptable, please return a signed copy of this Amendment to us at your earliest convenience, and we will return
a fully-executed copy to you.


 


	 	Sincerely,
	 	 
	 	Frankly Co.
	 	 	 
	 	By:	/s/
    John F. Wilk
	 	Name:	John
    F. Wilk
	 	Title:	General
Counsel
	 	 	 
	Accepted
    and Agreed:	 	 
	 	 	 
	/s/
    Steven Chung	 	 
	Steven
    Chung
# C_2014017EN.01000701.xml

| 21.1.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 17/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.1.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 17/7

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.7079 — Bulgaria Airways Group/Swissport International/Swissport Bulgaria)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2014/C 17/03

On 19 December 2013, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32013M7079. EUR-Lex is the online access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32013M7079. EUR-Lex is the online access to the European law.

---
Exhibit 99.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Donnkenny, Inc. (the "Company") on Form
10-K for the period ending December 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Maureen d. Schimmenti,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and result of operations
            of the Company.


/s/ Maureen d. Schimmenti

Maureen d. Schimmenti

Chief Financial Officer

March 30, 2004
**Exhibit 32.1**

CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Paul J.B, Murphy, III, as Chief Executive Officerof Einstein Noah Restaurant Group, Inc. (the “Company”), certify, pursuant to18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)   the Quarterly Report of the Company on Form10-Q for the quarter ended July 3, 2007, as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission (the “Report”), fully complies with the requirements ofSection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)   the information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

 
| Dated: August 10, 2007 | By: /s/ PAUL J. B. MURPHY, III |
|------------------------|--------------------------------|
|                   | Paul J. B. Murphy, III         |
|                   | Chief Executive Officer        |
|                   | Principal Executive Officer    |

 

----
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 21-3


         Subsidiaries and Affiliates of DTE Energy
         and The Detroit Edison Company


The Detroit Edison Company
         Midwest Energy Resources Company
         St. Clair Energy Corporation
         The Edison Illuminating Company of Detroit

DTE Capital Corporation

DTE Edison America, Inc.

Edison Development Corporation
         EdVenture Capital Corp.

Huron Energy Services, Inc.

Syndeco Realty Corporation

UTS Systems, Inc.

DE Energy Services, Inc.
         Edison Energy Services, Inc.
                  PCI Enterprises Company
                  EES Coke Battery Company, Inc.
         DTE Coal Services, Inc.
         Biomass Energy Systems, Inc.
                  Belleville Gas Producers, Inc.
                  Alabama Energy Systems, Inc.
         DTE Arbor Gas Producers, Inc.
                  ESCA Gas Producers, Inc.
         Plainville Gas Producers, Inc.
                  RES Power, Inc.
         Winston Gas Producers, Inc.
         Orlando Gas Producers, Inc.
                  FW Gas Producers, Inc.
         Sonoma Energy Systems, Inc.
                  Riverview Gas Producers, Inc.

Inactive subsidiaries and affiliates:

         DTE Center Point, Inc.
         Great Lakes Energy Products, Inc.
         Great Lakes Energy Services, Inc.
         Superior Energy Services, Inc.
         Wolverine Energy Services, Inc.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-6771

KRAIG SAVAGE,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

WARDEN, DILLWYN CORRECTIONAL CENTER,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, District

Judge. (CA-04-69)

Submitted: August 12, 2004 Decided: August 19, 2004

Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Kraig Savage, Appellant Pro Se. Eugene Paul Murphy, OFFICE OF THE

ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Kraig Savage seeks to appeal the district court’s order

denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000).

The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge

issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)

(2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a

substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28

U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by

demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that his

constitutional claims are debatable and that any dispositive

procedural rulings by the district court are also debatable or

wrong. See Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336 (2003);

Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee, 252 F.3d

676, 683 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the

record and conclude that Savage has not made the requisite showing.

Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the

appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process. 

DISMISSED
<PAGE>   1

                                                                   EXHIBIT 24(i)


                                POWER OF ATTORNEY

         KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS that the undersigned director of United
Dominion Industries Limited hereby constitutes and appoints Richard L. Magee and
William Dries and each of them singly, his true and lawful attorney-in-fact and
agent, with full power of substitution and resubstitution, for him and in his
name, place and stead, in any and all capacities, to sign the Annual Report on
Form 10-K of United Dominion Industries Limited for the year ended December 31,
1999, and any or all amendments and supplements thereto, and to file the same
with all exhibits thereto and other documents in connection therewith, with the
Securities and Exchange Commission, the New York Stock Exchange, the Toronto
Stock Exchange and any Canadian securities commissions, granting unto said
attorney-in-fact and agent full power and authority to do and perform each and
every act and thing requisite and necessary to be done in and about the
premises, as fully to all intents and purposes as he might or could do in
person, hereby ratifying and confirming all that said attorney-in-fact and agent
may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.

  /s/ J. T. Mayberry
--------------------------------------
      J. T. Mayberry, Director



    February 11, 2000
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 3563

To provide for an exemption for certain United States flag ships from radio

operator and equipment requirements.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

NOVEMBER 19, 1993

Mr. KINGSTON introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Energy and Commerce

A BILL

To provide for an exemption for certain United States flag

ships from radio operator and equipment requirements.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘U.S. Ship Safety and

5 Competitiveness Act of 1993’’.

6 SEC. 2. EXEMPTION FOR COMPLIANCE WITH GMDSS PROVI7 SIONS.

8 Section 352(a) of the Communications Act of 1934

9 (47 U.S.C. 352(a)) is amended—
2

•HR 3563 IH

1 (1) by redesignating paragraphs (5) through

2 (8) as paragraphs (6) through (9), respectively; and

3 (2) by inserting after paragraph (4) the follow4 ing new paragraph:

5 ‘‘(5) a United States ship operating in accord6 ance with the Global Maritime Distress and Safety

7 System provisions of the Safety Convention;’’.

Æ
2013.10-K_Exhibit_10.31






EXHIBIT 10.31
Summary of Director Compensation


Effective January 1, 2014


Cash Retainers (payable quarterly):


-Independent Directors - $70,000/year ($17,500/quarter) 
-Board Chair - additional $40,000/year ($10,000/quarter)
-Audit Committee Chair - additional $15,000/year ($3,750/quarter)
-Compensation Committee Chair - additional $10,000/year ($2,500/quarter)
-Nominating & Governance Committee Chair - additional $7,500/year ($1,875/quarter)


Per Meeting Fees:


-None


Equity (all time-based restricted stock with a one year cliff vest):


-Independent Directors - $110,000/year
-Board Chair - additional $50,000/year


-All equity granted on date of annual meeting.
-New Board members will receive an equity grant equal to the annual grant amount but prorated from date of election to the first anniversary of the last annual meeting.
257 La. 978

#### STATE of Louisiana v. Larry EVANS.

No. 51208.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

March 3, 1971.

In re: Larry Evans applying for alternative writs of review, certiorari and mandamus.

Writ denied. The showing made ■ does not warrant the exercise of our supervisory jurisdiction.
#### TANZEY v. STOUFFER FOOD CORPORATION.

No. 37138.

Supreme Court of Florida.

April 1968.

Certiorari dismissed without opinion.
#### Earnest Lee DUKES, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 77-1395.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Sept. 27, 1978.

Rehearing Denied Oct. 19, 1978.

Angelo M. Ferlita of Diecidue, Ferlita & Prieto, and Anthony Alfonso, Jr., Tampa, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Richard G. Pippinger, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the judgment of the trial court. However, the present sentence does not specifically set forth the period of credit time to be allowed as required by Section 921.161(1), Florida Statutes (1975). *Smith v. State,*310 So.2d 770 (Fla.2d DCA 1975). Moreover, the phrase “at hard labor” in the sentence is improper because no existing state statute provides for imprisonment at *1009hard labor as a sentence for any offense. *Speller v. State,*305 So.2d 231 (Fla.2d DCA 1974). Therefore, we remand the case for correction of sentence, and appellant need not be present at that time.

GRIMES, C. J., and HOBSON and DAN-AHY, JJ., concur.