alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 23.4

March 25, 1998


                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

As independent accountants, we hereby consent to the use of our reports dated
March 4, 1996, February 28, 1997 and February 25, 1998 relating to the
consolidated financial statements of Security Capital U.S. Realty in Security
Capital Group Incorporated's Form 10-K and to the incorporation by reference of
such reports into Security Capital Group Incorporated's previously filed
Registration Statements File Numbers 333-38521; 333-38523; 333-38525; 333-38527;
333-38531; 333-38533; 333-38537; 333-38539 and 333-48167.

Price Waterhouse sarl
24-26, avenue de Liberte
L-1014 Luxembourg
#### Larry DIE POLDER and Courtney Die Polder, his wife, Appellants, v. Irene B. KILPATRICK, Tax Collector, Hernando County, and J. Ed Straughn, Director, Department of Revenue, State of Florida, Appellees.

No. 70-924.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

March 31, 1971.

Rehearing Denied May 26, 1971.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
Slip Op. 06-119

UNITED STATES COURT OF INTERNATIONAL TRADE

HYNIX SEMICONDUCTOR, INC., :
HYNIX SEMICONDUCTOR : AMERICA, INC., :

: Plaintiffs, : : Before: Carman, Judge

v. : : Court No. 01-00988 UNITED STATES, :

: Defendant, :

: and :

: MICRON TECHNOLOGY, INC., :

: Defendant-Intervenor. :

:

JUDGMENT

This matter comes before the Court pursu ant to the decision of the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (“ CAFC”) in Hynix Semiconductor, Inc. v.
United States , 424 F.3d 1363 (Fed. Cir. 2005), revers ing in part and remanding the judgment of the Court in Hynix Se miconductor, Inc. v. United States , 28 CIT __, 318 F. Supp. 2d 1314 (2004) (“Hynix III”). Based on the CAFC’s decision, this Court
remanded this matter to the United States Department of Comme rce (“Commerce”).
Commerce was instructed to recalculate H ynix’s antidumping duty rate by expensing research and development costs. See Hynix Semiconductor, Inc. v. United States , No. 01-00988 (Ct. Int’l Trade Feb. 16, 2006). As to all other issues, this Court’s opinion in Hynix III controls.

On March 31, 2006, Commerce issued its Final Results of Redetermination
Pursuant to Court Remand (“Remand Redetermination”). In the Remand
Redetermination , Commerce recalculated Hynix’s weighted-average antidumping duty by expensing research and development costs in accordance with the CAFC decision. Commerce determined that Hynix’s margin of dumping for the period of May 1, 1999, through December 30, 1999, is 2.70 percent. Further, Commerce corrected theministerial error, identified by Micron in Hynix III , and used the corrected margin program for calculating Hynix’s import er-specific assessment rate.

Having received, reviewed, and duly considered Commerce’s Remand
Redetermination and comments from the parties, this Court holds that Commerce complied with the remand order. Further, this Court holds th at Commerce’s Remand
Redetermination is reasonable, supported by substa ntial evidence on the record, and otherwise in accordance with law; and it is hereby

ORDERED that Commerce’s Remand Redetermination of March 31, 2006, is affirmed in its entirety.

__/s/ Gregory W. Carman__ Gregory W. Carman

Dated: July 31, 2006 New York, New York
# C_2014047EN.01001001.xml

| 19.2.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 47/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.2.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 47/10

---

Corrigendum to the Notice from the Ministry of Economic Development of the Italian Republic pursuant to Article 3(2) of Directive 94/22/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on the conditions for granting and using authorisations for the prospection, exploration and production of hydrocarbons

(
  Official Journal of the European Union C 44 of 15 February 2014
  )

Official Journal of the European Union C 44 of 15 February 2014

2014/C 47/10

On page 7, first paragraph:

for:

‘... conventionally known as “d 85 F.R-.GM”, ...’,

read:

‘...conventionally known as “d 86 F.R-.GM”, ...’.

---
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 164 (Thursday, August 23, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Pages 42653-42654]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-18168]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

[CDC-2018-0028; Docket Number NIOSH-310]


Final National Occupational Research Agenda for Wholesale and 
Retail Trade

AGENCY: National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) 
of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Department of 
Health and Human Services (HHS).

ACTION: Notice of availability.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: NIOSH announces the availability of the final National 
Occupational Research Agenda for Wholesale and Retail Trade.

DATES: The final document was published August 17, 2018 on the CDC 
website.

ADDRESSES: The document may be obtained at the following link: https://

[[Page 42654]]

www.cdc.gov/niosh/nora/councils/wrt/agenda.html.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Emily Novicki, M.A., M.P.H, 
(<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#4a0405180b092525382e23242b3e25380a292e29642d253c"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="c58b8a978486aaaab7a1acaba4b1aab785a6a1a6eba2aab3">[email protected]</span></a>), National Institute for Occupational Safety 
and Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Mailstop E-20, 
1600 Clifton Road NE, Atlanta, GA 30329, phone (404) 498-2581 (not a 
toll free number).

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On April 24, 2018, NIOSH published a request 
for public review in the Federal Register [83 FR 17283] of the draft 
version of the National Occupational Research Agenda for Wholesale and 
Retail Trade. No comments were received.

    Dated: August 20, 2018.
Frank J. Hearl,
Chief of Staff, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, 
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
[FR Doc. 2018-18168 Filed 8-22-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4163-19-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
EXHIBIT 31.2  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SS. 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  I, Lisa Ramakrishnan, certify that:  1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Vantage Health;  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;  4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Company and have:  (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the Company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;  (b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;  (c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the Company's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  (d) Disclosed in this report any change in the Company's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the Company's most recent fiscal quarter (the Company's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company's internal control over financial reporting; and  5. I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Company's auditors and the board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):  (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Company's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Company's internal control over financial reporting.  Date: May 15, 2011   /s/ Lisa Ramakrishnan Lisa Ramakrishnan Chief Financial Officer
<PAGE>


                                                                   Exhibit 23.13

                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements on Forms S-8 (Nos. 333-38521, 333-38523, 333-38525, 333-38527,
333-38531, 333-38533, 333-38537, 333-38539, 333-48167, 333-61395, 333-65688 and
333-65704), Forms S-4 (No's. 333-61401 and 333-47926) and Form S-3 (No.
333-64979) of Security Capital Group Incorporated of our report dated 14 March
2001 relating to the financial statements of Security Capital European Realty,
which is included in the Security Capital Group Incorporated Annual Report on
Form 10-K.

PricewaterhouseCoopers S.a.r.l.                  Luxembourg, 28 March 2002
Reviseur d'entreprises
Represented by





Amaury Evrard
#### THE FLORIDA BAR. In re Jackson Malcolm JOBE Request for Placement Upon Inactive List.

No. 43397.

Supreme Court of Florida.

May 30, 1973.

*601William H. Maness, Jacksonville, for petitioner.

Wilson J. Foster, Jr., Tallahassee, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

This cause is before the Court on the petition of Jackson Malcolm Jobe for placement on the inactive list of Florida attorneys pursuant to the provisions of The Florida Bar Integration Rule 11.01(4), 32 F.S.A., in that he has not been adjudged incompetent but is incapable of practicing law at this time due to mental illness, incapacity, or other infirmity.

The Florida Bar opposes the petition of J-obe and cross-petitions for suspension of Jobe pursuant to Integration Rule 11.07(3), in that Jobe has been convicted in Federal Court of a felony, possession of 315 pounds of marijuana. Jobe filed a petition in response to the Bar, again urging that he be placed on the inactive list.

Jobe relies upon the decision of the Federal trial judge to order a study into his mental condition which might lead to a modification of his sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C.A. § 4208(b). Regardless of the outcome of this study, however, Jobe will remain adjudged guilty of a felony by a Federal court, and only the sentence is open to modification.

We agree, therefore, with the Bar that the provisions of Integration Rule 11.07(3) should apply, and it is, therefore, ordered that Jackson Malcolm Jobe is suspended as a member of The Florida Bar until such time as The Florida Bar might initiate other disciplinary proceedings, or until such time as Jobe petitions for and meets the criteria for reinstatement pursuant to Integration Rule 11.11.

It is so ordered.

CARLTON, C. J., and ADKINS, BOYD, McCAIN and DEKLE, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 32.1


          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
           18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
            AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
              SECTION 906 OF THE
          SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection with the Annual Report of Dionics, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ended December 31, 2003, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), the
undersigned certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best
of the undersigned's knowledge, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.


Dated: March 30, 2004                   By: /s/ Bernard Kravitz
                                        Bernard Kravitz,
                                        President and Chief
                                        Executive Officer
                                        (Principal Executive Officer)


Dated: March 30, 2004                   By: /s/ Bernard Kravitz
                                        Bernard Kravitz,
                                        Principal Financial Officer
## 

Exhibit 12.1

Merrill Corporation       Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fix Charges  (dollars in thousands)

|                                                |  |   |        |   |   |        |   |   |        |   |   |        |   |   |        | Pro Forma |  
|----------------------------------------------- |  | - | ------ | - | - | ------ | - | - | ------ | - | - | ------ | - | - | ------ | --------- | -
|
|
|
|                                                |  |   |        |   |   |        |   |   |        |   |   |        |   |   |        |           |  
|Income (loss) before provision for income taxes |  | $ | 18,706 |   | $ | 32,484 |   | $ | 46,466 |   | $ | 47,671 |   | $ | (8,801 | )         | $
|                                                |  |   |        |   |   |        |   |   |        |   |   |        |   |   |        |           |  
|Fixed charges                                   |  |   |        |   |   |        |   |   |        |   |   |        |   |   |        |           |  
|Cash interest expense                           |  |   | 1,099  |   |   | 4,124  |   |   | 4,321  |   |   | 3,961  |   |   | 12,771 |           |  
|Amortization of deferred financing costs        |  |   |       |   |   | 30     |   |   | 74     |   |   | 64     |   |   | 253    |           |  
|1/3 rent expense from operating leases          |  |   | 1,708  |   |   | 2,003  |   |   | 2,673  |   |   | 3,010  |   |   | 3,722  |           |  
|                                                |  |   |        |   |   |        |   |   |        |   |   |        |   |   |        |           |  
|Total fixed charges                             |  |   | 2,807  |   |   | 6,157  |   |   | 7,068  |   |   | 7,035  |   |   | 16,746 |           |  
|                                                |  |   |        |   |   |        |   |   |        |   |   |        |   |   |        |           |  
|Earnings + fixed charges                        |  | $ | 21,513 |   | $ | 38,641 |   | $ | 53,534 |   | $ | 54,706 |   | $ | 7,945  |           | $
|                                                |  |   |        |   |   |        |   |   |        |   |   |        |   |   |        |           |  
|Earnings to fixed charges(1)                    |  |   | 7.7    | x |   | 6.3    | x |   | 7.6    | x |   | 7.8    | x |   |       |           |  

---

---



## QuickLinks
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3348 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3348

Authorizing the designation of Portugal, Ireland, and Greece under the 
             visa waiver program under certain conditions.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 22, 1993

 Mr. Machtley (for himself, Mr. Frank of Massachusetts, Mr. Reed, Mr. 
Pombo, Mrs. Maloney, Mr. Schumer, Mr. King, Mr. Blute, Mr. Dellums, and 
Mr. Lipinski) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
Authorizing the designation of Portugal, Ireland, and Greece under the 
             visa waiver program under certain conditions.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. AUTHORIZING THE DESIGNATION OF PORTUGAL, IRELAND, AND GREECE 
              UNDER THE VISA WAIVER PROGRAM UNDER CERTAIN CONDITIONS.

    The Attorney General and the Secretary of State may jointly 
designate Portugal, Ireland, and Greece as a pilot program country 
under section 217(c) of the Immigration and Nationality Act for a 
fiscal year, notwithstanding that its nonimmigrant visa refusal rates 
do not meet the requirements specified in such section, if the rate of 
refusals of nonimmigrant visitor visas for nationals of Portugal, 
Ireland, and Greece during the previous fiscal year was at least 1 
percentage point less than such rate in the second previous fiscal 
year.

                                 <all>
```
# United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit

___________________________

No. 21-3041

___________________________ United States of America lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellee

v. Montez Deonta Quinn lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellant

____________ Appeal from United States District Court for the Western District of Missouri - Jefferson City

____________ Submitted: March 30, 2022 Filed: April 4, 2022 [Unpublished]

____________ Before LOKEN, BENTON, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges.

____________ PER CURIAM. Montez Quinn appeals the sentence imposed by the district court 1 after he pleaded guilty to being a felon in possession of a firearm, pursuant to a plea

1 The Honorable Roseann A. Ketchmark, United States District Judge for the Western District of Missouri.agreement that includes an appeal waiver. His counsel has moved to withdraw, and

has filed a brief under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), arguing that the district court erred in failing to award an acceptance-of-responsibility reduction. Upon careful review, we conclude that the appeal waiver is valid, enforceable, and applicable to the issue raised in this appeal. See United States v. Scott, 627 F.3d 702, 704 (8th Cir. 2010); United States v. Andis, 333 F.3d 886, 889-92 (8th Cir. 2003) (en banc). We have also independently reviewed the record under Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75 (1988), and have found no non-frivolous issues for appeal outside the scope of the appeal waiver. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal, and we grant counsel’s motion to withdraw.

______________________________

-2-
103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 328

AN ACT

To direct the Secretary of Agriculture to convey

certain lands to the town of Taos, New Mexico
103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 328

AN ACT

To direct the Secretary of Agriculture to convey certain

lands to the town of Taos, New Mexico.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION. 1. TAOS RANGER DISTRICT.

4 (a) CONVEYANCE OF PROPERTY.—Not later than 6

5 months after the date of enactment of this Act, the Sec6 retary of Agriculture shall convey by quit-claim deed to

7 the town of Taos, New Mexico, subject to the terms and

8 conditions stated in subsection (b), all right, title, and in9 terest of the United States in and to the land and improve10 ments thereon described as follows:
2

•HR 328 EH

1 That property locally referred to as the ‘‘Old

2 Taos Ranger District Office and Warehouse’’ located

3 in the town of Taos, Taos County, New Mexico, con4 taining approximately 0.633 acres, specifically de5 scribed in that certain warranty deed dated January

6 22, 1937, by William T. and Mary E. Hinde, hus7 band and wife, to the United States, as recorded on

8 January 23, 1937, in book A–34, page 415, of the

9 Record of Deeds of Taos County, New Mexico.

10 (b) TERMS AND CONDITIONS.—

11 (1) CONSIDERATION.—The conveyance de12 scribed in subsection (a) shall be in consideration of

13 the amount of $360,000, payable in full within the

14 6-month period referred to in subsection (a), or, at

15 the option of the town of Taos, in 20 annual pay16 ments of $18,000 due on January 1 of the first year

17 following enactment of this Act and annually there18 after until the total amount due has been paid, as

19 agreed upon by the Secretary of Agriculture. The

20 cash so received shall be deposited into a special

21 fund in the Treasury which will remain available,

22 subject to appropriations, until expended by the Sec23 retary for the purpose of acquiring, within the State

24 of New Mexico, lands or administrative facilities on

25 National Forest System lands. The town of Taos
3

•HR 328 EH

1 shall not be charged interest on amounts owed the

2 United States for such conveyance.

3 (2) RELEASE.—On transfer of the property

4 under subsection (a) the town of Taos shall release

5 the United States from any liability for claims relat6 ing to the property.

7 (3) REVERSION.—The conveyance described in

8 subsection (a) shall be a conveyance of fee simple

9 title to the property, subject to reversion to the

10 United States if the property is used for other than

11 public purposes or if the compensation requirements

12 described in paragraph (1) are not met.

Passed the House of Representatives April 21, 1993.

Attest:

Clerk.
# C_2013301EN.01001001.xml

| 17.10.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 301/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.10.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 301/10

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.7040 — CVC/Domestic & General Group Holdings)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2013/C 301/02

On 11 October 2013, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32013M7040. EUR-Lex is the online access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32013M7040. EUR-Lex is the online access to the European law.

---
#### Charity ROBINSON v. STATE.

No. 36987.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Feb. 1968.

Certiorari denied without opinion. 205 So.2d 336.