alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>


                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.2



                CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


    In connection with the Annual Report of Coram Healthcare Corporation (the
"Company") on Form l0-K for the year ended December 31, 2002, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Scott
R. Danitz, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:


         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.

                                                    /s/  SCOTT R. DANITZ
                                           ------------------------------------
                                                     Scott R. Danitz
                                                   Senior Vice President,
                                           Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer

April 15, 2003

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Coram Healthcare Corporation and will be retained by Coram
Healthcare Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or its staff upon request.
# C_2015388EN.01001601.xml

| 21.11.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 388/16 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.11.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 388/16

---

Notice of the impending expiry of certain anti-dumping measures

(2015/C 388/07)

1.   As provided for in Article 11(2) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009 of 30 November 2009 on protection against dumped imports from countries not members of the European Community (1), the Commission gives notice that, unless a review is initiated in accordance with the following procedure, the anti-dumping measures mentioned below will expire on the date mentioned in the table below.

1

2.   Procedure

Procedure

Union producers may lodge a written request for a review. This request must contain sufficient evidence that the expiry of the measures would be likely to result in a continuation or recurrence of dumping and injury.

Should the Commission decide to review the measures concerned, importers, exporters, representatives of the exporting country and Union producers will then be provided with the opportunity to amplify, rebut or comment on the matters set out in the review request.

3.   Time limit

Time limit

Union producers may submit a written request for a review on the above basis, to reach the European Commission, Directorate-General for Trade (Unit H-1), CHAR 4/39, 1049 Brussels, Belgium (2) at any time from the date of the publication of the present notice but no later than 3 months before the date mentioned in the table below.

2

4.   This notice is published in accordance with Article 11(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009.

| Product | Country(ies) of origin or exportation | Measures | Reference | Date of expiry (3) |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Barium carbonate | The People’s Republic of China | Anti-dumping duty | Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 831/2011 of 16 August 2011 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of barium carbonate originating in the People’s Republic of China following an expiry review pursuant to Article 11(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009 (OJ L 214, 19.8.2011, p. 1) | 20.8.2016 |

Product

Country(ies) of origin or exportation

Measures

Reference

Date of expiry (3)

3

Barium carbonate

The People’s Republic of China

Anti-dumping duty

Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 831/2011 of 16 August 2011 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of barium carbonate originating in the People’s Republic of China following an expiry review pursuant to Article 11(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009 (OJ L 214, 19.8.2011, p. 1)

20.8.2016

---

(1)  OJ L 343, 22.12.2009, p. 51.

1

(2)  TRADE-Defence-complaints@ec.europa.eu

2

(3)  The measure expires at midnight of the day mentioned in this column

3

---
#### STEVE HESSEN CONSTRUCTION CO., Inc., a Florida corporation, Appellant, v. METROPOLITAN DADE COUNTY, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, Appellee.

No. 70-281.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Nov. 24, 1970.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
#### Dale J. ARNOLD, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 70-758.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

March 24, 1972.

Walter N. Colbath, Jr., Public Defender, and Thomas C. Matevia, Asst. Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Andrew I. Friedrich, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellee.

*529PER CURIAM.

Having examined the record and briefs filed in this appeal, this court concludes that there was sufficient evidence for a jury to convict appellant of the crime charged. We affirm their holding.

Affirmed.

WALDEN, CROSS and MAGER, JJ., concur.
2/13/2015

Mr. Nick Rodriquez

President

Creative Aerial Media, LLC

950 West Monroe Street, Unit 608

Chicago, IL 60607

Dear Mr. Rodriquez :

This is in response to your September 26 , 2014, letter sent to the docket ( No. FAA

- 2014

-

0797 ) petitioning the Federal Avia tion Administration (FAA) on behalf of Creative Aerial

Media, LLC ( Creative Aerial Media ) for an exemption from p art 21 ; § § 45.23(b) ; 61.113 (a)

and (b); 91.7(a); 91.9 (b)( 2); 91.103 (b) ; 91.109; 91.119; 91.121; 91.151(a); 91.203(a) and (b);

91.405 (a); 91.407 (a) (1); 91.409 (a) (2); and 91.417 (a) and (b) of Title 14, Code of Federal

Regulations ( 14 CFR)

. That exemption, if granted, would allow Creative Aerial Media to

operate commercially using a small unmanned aerial vehicle in motion picture and television

oper ations

.

By email dated December 4 , 2014, which posted to the docket on December 8

, 2014, the

FAA sent you a request for additional information asking you to provide a copy of your

motion picture and television operations manual (MPTOM) for details on the pre

- flight

inspection.

In assessing your petition and MPTOM , the FAA discovered that you did not provide

sufficient information to assess several aspects of your proposed operations. This includes

information related to: operations in close proximity to participants, crew training, safety and

preflight procedures, and sterile area characteristics. This information is needed to assess the

requested relief and determine if it meets the requirements for exemption under 14 CFR part

11.2

Because your petiti on lacks sufficient information to proceed, the FAA has close d your

exemption request. Should you wish to provide the additional information please resubmit

your petition for exemption to the public docket.

Sincerely,

/s/

Lirio Liu

Director

Office of Rule making
#### Benjamin Pablo VIERA v. STATE.

No. 36749.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Feb. 1968.

Certiorari denied without opinion. 201 So.2d 925.
**IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVA NIA** 

IN RE: REAPPOINTMENTS TO INTERBRANCH COMMISSION FOR GENDER, RACIAL AND ETHNIC FAIRNESS : : : : : No. 470 JUDICIAL ADMINISTRATION DOCKET

**ORDER**
**PER CURIA M** 
AND NOW , this 2 8th day of November, 2016, the Honorable Kim Berkeley Clark, Allegheny County, the Honorable Deborah E. Curcillo, Dauphin County, and Jeanette H. Ho, Esquire, Allegheny County, are hereby reappointed as members of the Interbranch Commission for Gender, Racial and Ethnic Fairness for a term of two years commencing December 31, 2016.
CERTIFICATION,
      CHAIRMAN OF THE BOARD & PRESIDENT





Exhibit
      32.1








DOL
      RESOURCES, INC.





CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





We,
      S.
      Mort Zimmerman, Chief Executive Officer and Fred M. Updegraff, Chief Financial
      Officer of DOL Resources, Inc. (the “Company”), certify, pursuant to Section
      1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code, as adopted pursuant to Section
      906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
      The
      Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of the Company for the year ended December 31,
      2003
      (The “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





DATE:
      April 17, 2006





/s/
                S. MORT ZIMMERMANS.
                Mort Zimmerman, Chairman of the Board, andChief
                Executive Officer/s/
                FRED M. UPDEGRAFFFred
                M. Updegraff,Vice
                President, Chief Financial Officer, and Treasurer
U.S. flag
              An official website of the United States government Skip to main content   end of header Census.gov Newsroom Releases 2010 Census
 Newsroom Archive
 Skip left menu navigation
 About the Newsroom
 				Facts for Features
 				**News Releases**
 				Press Kits
 				Tip Sheets
 Release Information CB10-CN.82 **Contact:**  Public Information Office
301-763-3691
 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:  TUESDAY, OCT. 26, 2010 MEDIA ADVISORY — Census Bureau Director to Provide Update on Status of 2010 Census Operations U.S. Census Bureau Director Robert M. Groves will brief the media on the status of 2010 Census operations. Groves will discuss the final 2010 Census mail participation rates and 2020 Census planning.  The briefing will include a media question-and-answer session.
      National Press Club, 13th floor
    Holeman Lounge
    529 14th Street, NW
  Washington, DC 20045
 Members of the media may also participate by telephone. (Please dial-in early to allow time for the operator to place you in the call.) Dial-in number:  888-603-8938
Passcode:  2010 CENSUS  Event materials will be posted online shortly after the event begins and can be accessed by clicking on the 2010 Census Operational Press briefing at <http://2010.census.gov/news/press-kits/operational-press-briefing/>
  There will be a live webcast of the briefing, accessible at <http://www.visualwebcaster.com/event.asp?id=73902> at 2 p.m. (EDT) on event day.
 Please RSVP by 5 p.m., Friday, Oct. 29, to the Public Information Office at 301-763-3691 or to <pio.2010@census.gov>.
 
 CONNECT WITH US

Information Quality
                    Data Linkage Infrastructure
                    Data Protection and Privacy Policy
                    Accessibility      
                    FOIA
                    Inspector General
                    No FEAR Act
                    U.S. Department of Commerce
                    USA.gov
                   Measuring America's People, Places, and Economy
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 3667

To redesignate the Federal building located at Ninth and Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Washington, DC, and known as the ‘‘J. Edgar Hoover Federal

Bureau of Investigation Building’’ as the ‘‘Federal Bureau of Investigation Building’’.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

NOVEMBER 22, 1993

Mr. MURPHY introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Public Works and Transportation

A BILL

To redesignate the Federal building located at Ninth and

Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Washington, DC, and known

as the ‘‘J. Edgar Hoover Federal Bureau of Investigation Building’’ as the ‘‘Federal Bureau of Investigation

Building’’.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION AND RENAMING OF THE FED4 ERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION BUILDING.

5 (a) REDESIGNATION.—The Federal building located

6 at Ninth and Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Washington,

7 DC, and known as the ‘‘J. Edgar Hoover Federal Bureau
2

•HR 3667 IH

1 of Investigation Building’’ shall be known and designated

2 as the ‘‘Federal Bureau of Investigation Building’’.

3 (b) SIGNS.—The Administrator of the General Serv4 ices shall cause all signs and engravings designating or

5 otherwise referring to the J. Edgar Hoover Federal Bu6 reau of Investigation Building to refer to the ‘‘Federal Bu7 reau of Investigation Building’’.

8 (c) LEGAL REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law,

9 map, regulation, document, paper, or other record of the

10 United States to the Federal building referred to in sub11 section (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Fed12 eral Bureau of Investigation Building’’.

Æ
FILED 

GREGG COUNTY, TEXAI 

CAUSE NO. 43827-B 

THE STATE OF TEXAS 

vs. 

TASARIRISHE ALEX 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

IN THE DISTRICT COURT 

OF GREGG COUNTY, TEXAS 

124TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT 

NOTICE OF APPEAL 

TO THE HONORABLE JUDGE OF SAID COURT: 

Today, this March 31st, 2015, the Defendant, Tasaririshe Alex, gives Notice of Appeal ofher 

conviction and sentence in the above-styled cause. 

The Defendant also asks the court to set bail. 

so 

State ar No. 24069976 

736-A Hwy. 259 N. 

Kilgore, TX 75662 

Phone: (903) 654-3362 

Fax: (817) 887-4333 

Email: jefftjacksonlaw@gmail.com 

ATTORNEY FOR DEFENDANT 

 FILED IN 6th COURT OF APPEALS TEXARKANA, TEXAS 4/1/2015 9:06:02 AM DEBBIE AUTREY Clerk
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I certify that I have hand-delivered a true and correct copy of the foregoing Motion to the 

Gregg County District Attorney's office at the address of such parties shown by the pleadings 

herein on this 3P1 day ofMarch, 2015. 

Respectfully submitted, 

Jeff . ackson 

Texas Bar No. 24069976 

Attorney for Defendant
**EXHIBIT
      32.2**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906**


**OF
      THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Annual Report of The Singing Machine Company, Inc. (the
      "Company") on Form 10-K for the year ended March 31, 2008 as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Carol
      Lau, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
      Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
      of
      2002, that:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      The Singing Machine Company, Inc. and will be retained by The Singing Machine
      Company, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
      staff upon request.




*/S/
                Carol Lau**Carol
                Lau*
              *Chief
                Financial Officer*
              *(Principal
                Accounting and Financial Officer)**Date:
                July 9, 2008*
#### Ralph McGRUDER, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 66-533.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Third District.

Oct. 10, 1967.

Robert L. Koeppel, Public Defender, and Marvin J. Emory, Jr., Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellant.

Earl Faircloth, Atty. Gen., Gus Efthimi-ou, Sp. Asst. Atty. Gen., and Arden M. Siegendorf, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

Before PEARSON, HENDRY and SWANN, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed on the authority of Taylor v. State, Fla.App.1966, 183 So.2d 865; Hunt v. State, Fla.App. 1966, 183 So.2d 858.
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

Each of theundersigned, in his capacity as an officer of Cubic Corporation herebycertifies pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:

 

1.               The annual report of Cubic Corporation (the “Registrant”)on Form 10-K for the year ended September 30, 2009 (the “Report”),which accompanies this certification, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

 

2.               The information contained in the Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition of the Registrantat the end of such year and the results of operations of the Registrant forsuch year.

 

 
| /s/ W. J. Zable             |                    | /s/ W.W. Boyle |
|-----------------------------|-------------------------|----------------|
| W. J. Zable                 | W. W. Boyle             |
| Chief Executive Officer     | Chief Financial Officer |
|                        |                    |
| Date: December 8, 2009 |                    |

 

1

----
Exhibit
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE


SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Brooklyn Cheesecake & Desserts
Company, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2009,
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
“Report”), I, Anthony J. Merante, President, Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:





(i)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section
      15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
  and





(ii)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.





Date: May
15, 2009


/s/
      Anthony J. MeranteAnthony
      J. MerantePresident,
      Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
  Officer
# C_2015367EN.01000403.xml

| 5.11.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 367/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.11.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 367/4

---

EUROPEAN CENTRE FOR DISEASE PREVENTION AND CONTROL

Publication of the final accounts for the financial year 2014

(2015/C 367/14)

The complete version of the final accounts may be found at the following address:

http://ecdc.europa.eu/en/aboutus/Key%20Documents/Final-Annual-Accounts-2014.pdf

---
#### Douglas McArthur TENNANT, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. J-76.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. First District.

Dec. 19, 1967.

Rehearing Denied Jan. 15, 1968.

Edward L. Bush, Palatka, for appellant.’

Earl Faircloth, Atty. Gen., and Raymond L. Marky, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant has appealed a judgment of conviction and sentence based upon a jury verdict finding him guilty of violating the beverage laws of this state.

The evidence introduced against appellant at the trial consisted of testimony by law enforcement officers concerning moonshine whisky and a still found in defendant’s possession during a search of his residence made pursuant to a search warrant, the legality of which was not questioned. At the conclusion of the State’s evidence appellant moved the court to suppress a photograph of the still taken during the search and for a directed verdict on the ground that because of the State’s failure to introduce in evidence the search warrant, the testimony of what the witnesses found during the search was inadmissible. It is appellant’s position that without such incriminating evidence the verdict of guilty rendered against him cannot be sustained.

Appellant has cited no authority, and our research has revealed none, which holds that evidence procured under a valid search warrant and introduced in the case without obj ection during the trial is rendered incompetent and subject to suppression unless the search warrant is received in evidence as proof of the legality of the search. The record reveals that the officers procured a search warrant and acted pursuant to its authority in making their search of appellant’s premises as testified to at the trial. No objection to this testimony was interposed by defendant when offered, nor was the validity of the warrant or search made pursuant to it ever attacked. It was not until the State had completed its evidence and rested its case that the motion to suppress the evidence and for a directed verdict was made. It appears to be the settled law of this state that an objection to incriminating evidence offered in proof of an alleged crime must be seasonably made during the trial at the time when it is introduced. Failure to so object constitutes a waiver and cannot be raised either at a *325later stage of the proceedings, or for the first time on appeal. This is so even though a motion to suppress the evidence is preliminarily made and denied by the court.1

It is our view that appellant’s motion for directed verdict because of the State’s failure to introduce in evidence the search warrant involved in this case was not well taken as a matter of law, and that the trial court correctly denied it.

We have considered the remaining point urged by appellant on appeal but find it to be without substantial merit. The judgment appealed is accordingly affirmed.

WIGGINTON, C. J., and CARROLL, DONALD K. and RAWLS, JJ, concur.

1

. Fraterrigo v. State (1942) 151 Fla. 634, 10 So.2d 361; Robertson v. State, 94 Fla. 770, 114 So. 534.