alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
|    |                                                                                             |
|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| 1. | I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of FelCor Lodging Trust Incorporated; and |

|    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            |
|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| 2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report. |

|                       |
|-----------------------|
|                       |  |  |
| Date:  April 28, 2017 |   | /s/ Steven R. Goldman |
|                  |   | Steven R. GoldmanChief Executive Officer |
xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?


C\_2015339EN.01000401.xml


| | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 14.10.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 339/4 |

---

EU-28 ethyl alcohol balance sheet for 2014

(Established on 24 September 2015 in accordance with Article 2 of Regulation (EC) No 2336/2003)

(2015/C 339/05)

| | | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | EU-28 ethyl alcohol balance sheet for 2014 Established on 24 September 2015 in accordance with Article 2 of Regulation (EC) No 2336/2003[(1)](#ntr1-C_2015339EN.01000401-E0001) | | | Hectolitres of pure alcohol (HLPA) |
| 1. | Initial stock | | | — |
| | | | | --- | --- | | — | Agricultural origin | | | | 16 415 600 |
| | | | | --- | --- | | — | Non-agricultural origin | | | | — |
| 2. | Production | | | — |
| | | | | --- | --- | | — | Agricultural origin | | | | 69 106 578 |
| | | | | --- | --- | | — | Non-agricultural origin | | | | — |
| 3. | Imports[(2)](#ntr2-C_2015339EN.01000401-E0002) [(3)](#ntr3-C_2015339EN.01000401-E0003) | | | 4 919 325 |
| | | | | --- | --- | | — | 0 % duty | | | | 4 044 646 |
| | | | | --- | --- | | — | Reduced duty | | | | — |
| | | | | --- | --- | | — | 100 % duty | | | | 874 679 |
| 4. | Total resources | | | 90 441 503 |
| 5. | Exports | | | 2 081 573 |
| 6. | Internal consumption | | | 71 433 079 |
| | Agricultural | Non-agricultural | Total |
| Food | 14 735 795 | | |
| Industrial | 8 169 771 | | |
| Fuel[(3)](#ntr3-C_2015339EN.01000401-E0003) | 47 050 088 | | |
| Other | 1 477 425 | | |
| | Total | 71 433 079 | | |
| 7. | Final stock | | | — |
| | | | | --- | --- | | — | Agricultural origin | | | | 16 926 851 |
| | | | | --- | --- | | — | Non-agricultural origin | | | | — |
| | | | | |

---

[(1)](#ntc1-C_2015339EN.01000401-E0001)  Commission Regulation (EC) No 2336/2003 of 30 December 2003 introducing certain detailed rules for applying Council Regulation (EC) No 670/2003 laying down specific measures concerning the market in ethyl alcohol of agricultural origin ([OJ L 346, 31.12.2003, p. 19](http://publications.europa.eu/resource/oj/JOL_2003_346_R_TOC)).

[(2)](#ntc2-C_2015339EN.01000401-E0002)  Covers only products under codes CN 2207 10, CN 2207 20, CN 2208 90 91 and CN 2208 90 99.

[(3)](#ntc3-C_2015339EN.01000401-E0003)  Excludes 3,5 million HLPA under CN 3824 90 97 and 0,8 million HLPA of ETBE under CN 2909 19 10 used to produce fuel.

Sources: Communications from the Member States/Eurostat Comext

---
# C_2015062EN.01000301.xml

| 20.2.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 62/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.2.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 62/3

---

Notice for the attention of the data subjects to whom the restrictive measures provided for in Council Regulation (EC) No 314/2004 concerning certain restrictive measures in respect of Zimbabwe apply

(2015/C 62/03)

The attention of data subjects is drawn to the following information in accordance with Article 12 of Regulation (EC) No 45/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council (1):

1

The legal basis for this processing operation is Council Regulation (EC) No 314/2004 of 19 February 2004, concerning certain restrictive measures in respect of Zimbabwe (2).

2

The controller of this processing operation is the Council of the European Union represented by the Director General of DG C (Foreign Affairs, Enlargement, Civil Protection) of the General Secretariat of the Council and the department entrusted with the processing operation is the Unit 1C of DG C that can be contacted at:

| Council of the European Union |
| --- |
| General Secretariat |
| DG C 1C |
| Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175 |
| 1048 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |
| E-mail: sanctions@consilium.europa.eu |

Council of the European Union

General Secretariat

DG C 1C

Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175

1048 Bruxelles/Brussel

BELGIQUE/BELGIË

E-mail: sanctions@consilium.europa.eu

The purpose of the processing operation is the establishment and updating of the list of persons subject to restrictive measures in accordance with Council Regulation (EC) No 314/2004.

The data subjects are the natural persons who fulfil listing criteria as laid down in that Regulation.

The personal data collected includes data necessary for the correct identification of the person concerned, the Statement of Reasons and any other data related thereto.

The personal data collected may be shared as necessary with the European External Action Service and the Commission.

Without prejudice to restrictions provided for in Article 20(1)(a) and (d) of Regulation (EC) No 45/2001, requests for access, as well as requests for rectification or objection will be answered in accordance with section 5 of Council Decision 2004/644/EC (3).

3

Personal data will be retained for 5 years from the moment the data subject has been removed from the list of persons subject to the asset freeze or the validity of the measure has expired, or for the duration of court proceedings in the event they had been started.

Data subjects may have recourse to the European Data Protection Supervisor in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 45/2001.

---

(1)  OJ L 8, 12.1.2001, p. 1.

1

(2)  OJ L 55, 24.2.2004, p. 1.

2

(3)  OJ L 296, 21.9.2004, p. 16.

3

---
## 

WATERS INSTRUMENTS, INC.       1995 STOCK OPTION PLAN       AMENDMENT NO. 1  DATED OCTOBER 28, 1999

On October 28, 1999, the Board of Directors of Waters Instruments, Inc. approved the following amendment to the Company's 1995 Stock Option Plan to increase the shares available pursuant
to Section 5 of the Plan from 150,00 to 375,000, which amendment was approved by the shareholders on March 15, 2000:



| |  | John A. Grimstad, Secretary
Waters Instruments, Inc.
| |  | ----------------------------------------------------

---

## QuickLinks
# C_2014291EN.01000501.xml

| 30.8.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 291/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.8.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 291/5

---

Communication from the Commission concerning the quantity not applied for to be added to the quantity fixed for the subperiod 1 January to 31 March 2015 under certain quotas opened by the European Union for products in the poultrymeat sector

2014/C 291/02

Commission Regulation (EC) No 616/2007 (1) opened tariff quotas for imports of products in the poultrymeat sector. The applications for import licences lodged during the first seven days of July 2014 for the subperiod 1 October to 31 December 2014 are, for quotas 09.4217, 09.4218, 09.4252 and 09.4256, for quantities smaller than those available. Pursuant to the second sentence of Article 7(4) of Commission Regulation (EC) No 1301/2006 (2), the quantities that were not applied for are to be added to the quantity fixed for the following quota subperiod, from 1 January to 31 March 2015; they are set out in the Annex to this communication.

1

2

---

(1)  OJ L 142, 5.6.2007, p. 3.

1

(2)  OJ L 238, 1.9.2006, p. 13.

2

---

ANNEX

| Quota order number | Quantities not applied for, to be added to the quantity fixed for the subperiod 1 January to 31 March 2015
  (in kg) |
| --- | --- |
| 09.4217 | 28 058 400 |
| 09.4218 | 6 957 600 |
| 09.4252 | 2 871 503 |
| 09.4256 | 2 595 003 |

Quota order number

Quantities not applied for, to be added to the quantity fixed for the subperiod 1 January to 31 March 2015

(in kg)

09.4217

28 058 400

09.4218

6 957 600

09.4252

2 871 503

09.4256

2 595 003

---
# C_2014302EN.01000101.xml

| 6.9.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 302/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.9.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 302/1

---

Information from the Commission about notifications by the Member States of decisions concerning the application of Decision No 565/2014/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council

2014/C 302/01

I.   Background

Background

In accordance with Article 5 of Decision No 565/2014/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 May 2014, introducing a simplified regime for the control of persons at the external borders based on the unilateral recognition by Bulgaria, Croatia, Cyprus and Romania of certain documents as equivalent to their national visas for transit through or intended stays on their territories not exceeding 90 days in any 180-day period and repealing Decisions No 895/2006/EC and No 582/2008/EC, the Member States concerned had to notify the Commission by 20 July 2014 whether they decided to apply it.

Those notifications had, where relevant, to specify the third countries with regard to which Bulgaria, Croatia, Cyprus and Romania do not, in the absence of diplomatic relations, apply the Decision pursuant to Article 2(3) and Article 3(1).

II.   Information

Information

The Commission has received the following notifications.

BULGARIA implements Decision No 565/2014/EU, and in accordance with Article 3 of the Decision recognises national visas and residence permits issued by Croatia, Cyprus and Romania listed, respectively, in Annex II, III and IV of the Decision, as equivalent to Bulgarian visas.

CROATIA implements Decision No 565/2014/EU, and in accordance with Article 3 of the Decision recognises national visas and residence permits issued by Bulgaria, Cyprus and Romania listed, respectively, in Annex I, III and IV of the Decision, as equivalent to Croatian visas.

CYPRUS implements Decision No 565/2014/EU, and in accordance with Article 3 of the Decision recognises national visas and residence permits issued by Bulgaria, Croatia and Romania listed, respectively, in Annex I, II and IV of the Decision, as equivalent to Cypriot visas.

Pursuant to Article 2(3) and Article 3(1) of the Decision and in the absence of diplomatic relations, Cyprus will not apply this Decision with regard to visas and residence permits affixed to travel documents issued by Azerbaijan and Turkey.

ROMANIA implements Decision No 565/2014/EU, and in accordance with Article 3 of the Decision recognises national visas and residence permits issued by Bulgaria, Cyprus and Croatia listed, respectively, in Annex I, II and III of the Decision, as equivalent to Romanian visas.

---
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 20
- 6925

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,

v. RAYMOND IDEMUDIA AIGBEKAEN , Defendant

- Appellant

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland , at Baltimore

. James K. Bredar , Chief District Judge. ( 1:15

- cr - 00462

- JKB

- 2 )

Submitted : November 18, 2021 Decided: November 24, 2021

Before MOTZ, WYNN, and RICHARDSON , Circuit Judges.

Vacated and remanded by un published per curiam opinion

. Raymond Idemudia Aigbekaen, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Raymond Idemudia Aigbekaen appeals the district court’s order denying his 18
U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A)(i) motion for compassionate release. Before seeking compassionate release in the district court, an inmate must satisfy the threshold requirement of 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A). However, as we re cently held, this requirement is nonjurisdictional and, thus, subject to forfeiture or waiver if not timely raised. See United States v. Muhammad , 16 F.4th 126, 129

- 30 (4th Cir. 2021). Here, the district court

— which did not have the benefit of our decis ion in Muhammad

— erred by sua sponte raising the threshold requirement and denying relief on that basis. See id. at 130. Accordingly, we vacate the district court’s order and remand for further proceedings. In addition, we deny Aigbekaen’s motions to appoint counsel, to supplement the record, to unseal part of the record, to order a limited remand, for release
pen ding appeal, to dismiss part of the indictment, and for resentencing

. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
VA CATED AND REMANDED
#### Leo Joseph SAITTA, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 72-616.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Nov. 17, 1972.

Walter R. Talley, Public Defender, and Edwin T. Mulock, Asst. Public Defender, Bradenton, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Richard C. Booth, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Kirby v. Illinois, 1972, 406 U.S. 682, 92 S.Ct. 1877, 32 L.Ed.2d 411; Harrison v. Wainwright, Fla.App. 1st 1971, 243 So.2d 427.

LILES, Acting C. J., and MANN and McNULTY, JJ., concur.
StormKlear EPA Case Study

Project: Arundel Preserve, Hanover, MD

Master Developer: Somerset Construction

Developers: Bozzuto Development, Southern Mgmt.,

Toll Brothers, COPT

Product: StormKlear DPS Segmented Socks

Dose Rate: 5 mg/L

Description: Arundel Preserve is a 268 acre, mixed‐use community located in the heart of the Baltim

Washington Corridor, which is part of the 1,100‐acre Arundel Mills Development. In areas near BWI

International Airport,  sediment basins must be dewatered within 48 hours after a rain event, and m

125 NTU discharge limit; even though the site was thoroughly stabilized, the fine suspended particle

the runoff required additional chemical treatment. StormKlear DPS Segmented Geosynthetic Socks w

presoaked and placed in an 8” dual chambered schedule 40 PVC manifold. The DBP‐2100 Socks wer

installed in the first chamber, and the GelFloc  Socks in the second; the discharge hose was then rou

to a 15’ x 15’ TerraTex N10 filterbag.

Results – Influent: 570 NTU, Filterbag Discharge: <50 NTU

Residual Biopolymer Test: Negative
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 3664

To direct the Secretary of the Interior to convey to the State of Minnesota

the New London National Fish Hatchery production facility.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

NOVEMBER 22, 1993

Mr. MINGE introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee

on Merchant Marine and Fisheries

A BILL

To direct the Secretary of the Interior to convey to the

State of Minnesota the New London National Fish

Hatchery production facility.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. CONVEYANCE OF NEW LONDON NATIONAL

4 FISH HATCHERY PRODUCTION FACILITY.

5 (a) CONVEYANCE AUTHORIZED.—Notwithstanding

6 any other provision of law and within 180 days after the

7 date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of the

8 Interior shall convey to the State of Minnesota without

9 reimbursement all right, title, and interest of the United

10 States in and to the property comprising the New London
2

•HR 3664 IH

1 National Fish Hatchery production facility, located out2 side of downtown New London, Minnesota, including—

3 (1) all easements and water rights relating to

4 that property, and

5 (2) all land, improvements, and related personal

6 property comprising that production facility.

7 (b) USE OF PROPERTY.—All property and interests

8 conveyed under this section shall be used by the Minnesota

9 Department of Natural Resources for the Minnesota fish10 ery resources management program.

11 (c) REVERSIONARY INTEREST.—All right, title, and

12 interest in and to all property and interests conveyed

13 under this section shall revert to the United States on any

14 date on which any of the property or interests are used

15 other than for the Minnesota fishery resources manage16 ment program.

Æ
#### Ray Garrett EAGLE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 72-383.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Dec. 20, 1972.

Charles W. Musgrove, Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Andrew I. Friedrich, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant-defendant, Ray Garrett Eagle, was charged by information with receiving stolen property, tried by jury, convicted, adjudged guilty by the court and sentenced to a term of imprisonment. Hence this appeal. The thrust of the appeal is that the judgment is defective and the imposition of sentence illegal.

The judgment failed to recite that appellant received the property with knowledge of its stolen character. Such a judgment is defective in omitting a material element of the offense as charged. Mathis v. State, 134 Fla. 352, 184 So. 89 (1938); Biesendorfer v. State, 227 So.2d 322 (Fla.App.1969).

Accordingly, the judgment is reversed and the sentence is vacated and set aside, and the cause remanded for entry of judgment consistent with the views herein expressed and imposition of sentence as the justice of the cause shall require.1

Reversed and remanded.

WALDEN, CROSS and MAGER, JJ., concur.

1

. See North Carolina v. Pearce, 395 U.S. 711, 89 S.Ct. 2072, 23 L.Ed.2d 656 (1969), on re-imposition of sentence.
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3576 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3576

  To clarify the tariff classification of certain organo-phosphorous 
                  compounds and preparations thereof.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           November 19, 1993

  Mr. Tauzin introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To clarify the tariff classification of certain organo-phosphorous 
                  compounds and preparations thereof.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CERTAIN ORGANO-PHOSPHOROUS COMPOUNDS.

    Chapter 29 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States 
is amended by striking subheading 2931.00.50 and inserting in numerical 
sequence the following new superior text and subheadings, with the 
article description for subheading 2931.00.45 having the same degree of 
indentation as the article description in subheading 2931.00.10:

      

       ``                Other:                                                                                 
           2931.00.45      N-(Phosphonomethyl)glycine;                            Free           15.4 cents/    
                            Phosphonomethyliminodiacetic acid;                     (E,IL,CA)      kg + 68%      
                            Aminomethane phosphonic acid; and their                                             
                            salts and esters.......................  12.5%                                      
           2931.00.55      Other...................................  3.7%         Free (A*,CA,   25%            
                                                                                   E,IL,J)                    ''

SEC. 2. PREPARATIONS CONTAINING CERTAIN ORGANO-PHOSPHOROUS COMPOUNDS.

    Chapter 38 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States 
is amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following new 
superior text and subheading, with the article description having the 
same indentation as the article description in subheading 3808.30.20:

      

       ``                Other:                                                                                 
           3808.30.15      Containing N-(phosphonomethyl)glycine or               Free           15.4 cents/    
                            its salts or esters....................  12.5%         (E,CA,IL)      kg + 68%    ''

SEC. 3. APPLICABILITY.

    The amendments made by sections 1 and 2 shall apply with respect to 
goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after 
the date of the enactment of this Act.

                                 <all>
```
252 La. 828

#### SUCCESSION of Eugene H. DASTE.

No. 49341.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Oct. 3, 1968.

In re: Mrs. Mae Coltraro, widow of Eugene H. Daste, applying for certiorari, or writ of review to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, Parish of Orleans. 210 So.2d 521.

It is ordered that the writ of review issue; that the Court of Appeal send up the record in duplicate of the case; and that counsel for plaintiff and defendant be notified.
#### STATE v. James M. CHAFFIN.

No. 36936.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Feb. 1968.

Certiorari denied without opinion. 204 So.2d 22.
Exhibit 32.1  SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION  In connection with the quarterly report of Artificial Intelligence Technology Solutions Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended August 31, 2019 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Garett Parsons, President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. SS. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  1.
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2.
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.  Date: December 5, 2019
    BY: /s/ Garett ParsonsGarett ParsonsPresident, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, 
Principal Accounting Officer, Treasurer and Director  A signed original of this written statement
required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed
form within the electronic version of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company
and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
257 La. 980

#### THRIFT FUNDS CANAL, INC. v. Leroy (LeRoy) Michael FOY.

No. 51174.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

March 10, 1971.

In re: First National Life Insurance Company, applying for certiorari, or writ of review to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, Parish of Jefferson. 242 So.2d 253.

It is ordered that the writ of review issue; that the Court of Appeal send up the record in duplicate of the case; and that counsel for plaintiff and defendant be notified.