alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Vicente F. DOMINGUEZ, Appellant, v. Bienvenido M. BENACH, Jr., Gerald William West & Associates, jointly and severally, Appellees.

No. 72-1257.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

May 8, 1973.

Lopez, Hannon & Harris, Miami, for appellant.

Suarez, Carricarte & Freire, Miami, for appellees.

Before BARKDULL, C. J., and PEARSON and HENDRY, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

By this appeal, plaintiff counter-defendant, seeks review of certain portions of an adverse final judgment dismissing his complaint and crossclaim in an action on an architect’s contract and denying a counterclaim which attempted to assert a mechanic’s lien, allegedly supported by an oral agreement.

We find no merit in the points raised by the appellant, save and except that which points out that the trial judge erred in not awarding him attorney fees as the prevailing party in successfully resisting a mechanic’s lien. See: Emery v. International Glass & Mfg., Inc., Fla.App.1971, 249 So. *5682d 496; H. D. McPherson, Inc. v. Metro Electric of Orlando, Inc., Fla.App.1971, 253 So.2d 878; Houdaille-Duval-Wright Company v. Charldon Construction Company, Fla.App.1972, 266 So.2d 106; Potter v. Rowan, Fla.App.1972, 266 So.2d 121; § 713.29, Fla.Stat, F.S.A.

We therefore reverse so much of the final judgment here under review which denied the request for attorney fees by the appellant, as plaintiff in the trial court, and return the cause with directions to the trial judge to receive evidence as to the reasonable fee that should be allowed the plaintiff for successfully resisting the counterclaim seeking to foreclose a mechanic’s lien.

Affirmed in part, reversed in part with directions.
No. 72-979.

#### Thorne *v.*United States.

Ct. Cl. Certiorari denied.
NUMBER 13-18-00373-CR

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

ROCIO RIVERA GARCIA, Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee.

On appeal from the 206th District Court 

of Hidalgo County, Texas.

ORDER

Before Chief Justice Contreras and Justices Longoria and Hinojosa

Order Per Curiam

This Court has received the appellate record with the exception of State’s Exhibits

5 (“Dash Cam Video”) and 5A (“USB Dash Cam Video”). The clerk of the trial court is 

ORDERED to forward State’s Exhibits 5 and 5A admitted at trial in trial court cause 

number CR-2508-17-D to this Court within fifteen days from the date of this order. 
2

PER CURIAM

Do not publish. 

TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).

Delivered and filed the

12th day of March, 2020.
## Martin , Michae l (OST) O^^T - 0 ST - ^Oo S - 0 ^^V ^ OrPTOFTRANSP i From : Cit yManage r[citymanager@cityofkake.org ] Sent : :: ; -..Thursday , Jul y01,201012:4 0 Pi\/ 1 't o To:. ^ • Martin , Michae l (OST ) Subject : Publi cCommen t •-\ [:: ; U : '•; } I apologiz e fo rno t makin g th e deadlin e yesterda yan d as k tha t yo u stil l accep t ou rpubli c comment s fo rAi rServic e t o Kake , Alaska . A s th e Cit yiVIanage rfo rKake , Alaska , a consensu s o f th e communit yan d th e Cit yCounci l seem s t o indicat e th e preferre d servic e b e b yWing s Alaska t o ou rcommunit yfo rth e nex t tw o years . However , i t ha s bee n expresse d tha t th e communit ywoul d lik e t o se e increase d availabl e flight s b yWing s o f Alaska . I f tha t i s no t possibl e fo radditiona l flights , the n allowin g anothe rcarrie rt o com e i n o n time s tha t Wing s i s no t available . I hav e personall yha d thi s experienc e whil e I wa s statione d a t a remot e sit e o n th e Bearin g Sea i n Alaska , wher e servic e by e Wei n Airline s wa s schedule d fo r thre e time s a week . 1 personall ycoordinate d wit h th e US Posta l Servic e logistic s office ran d wa s abl e t o secur e servic e b ySeaAi ro n th e day s tha t Wei n wa s no t scheduled . Than k yo u ver ymuch fo ryo u tim e an d pleas e accep t m yapolog yo n th e delaye d input . Willia m Le e Cit yManager
#### Lenore C. POOLE, Appellant, v. Susan Helen WALLANDER, Appellee.

No. 856.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Fourth District.

Feb. 9, 1967.

Appeal from Court of Record, Broward County; Douglas S. Lambeth, Judge.

Appeal dismissed.
U.S. flag
              An official website of the United States government Skip to main content   end of header Census.gov Newsroom Releases Miscellaneous
 Newsroom Archive
 Skip left menu navigation
 About the Newsroom
 				Facts for Features
 				**News Releases**
 				Press Kits
 				Tip Sheets
 Release Information CB12-245 **Contact:**  Public Information Office
301-763-3030
 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:  MONDAY, DEC. 17, 2012 Census Bureau's Statistical Abstract Honored  for 133 Years as Premier Reference Book The Reference and User Services Association (RUSA) presented its Lifetime Achievement Award to the U.S. Census Bureau for the Statistical Abstract of the United States — acknowledging the abstract's role as one of the premier reference sources for the past 133 years. RUSA, a division of the American Library Association, initially announced the award at its Midwinter Book and Media Awards Reception in Dallas earlier this year while recognizing the top reading and reference titles as selected by expert librarians. RUSA President Mary Popp said the Statistical Abstract has been indispensable for librarians. “For the student who needs to know how many rural adults play online games to include in a paper, the business owner trying to identify the number of adults 25 to 34 who purchased sporting goods to plan targeted marketing, the state official who needs to learn about how much air pollution is generated by chemical manufacturing, and many others — along with the reference librarians who work with them — the Statistical Abstract of the United States has been one of our most useful and trusted resources about American life,” Popp said. "RUSA and its members celebrate the staff of the Census Bureau and the Statistical Abstract for the rich resource made available for so many years.” The Statistical Abstract gathers information from multiple government and nongovernment sources. The Census Bureau announced in March 2011 that it would cease production of the Statistical Abstract after the 2012 edition because of budget constraints and a major investment in digital dissemination of Census Bureau statistics. However, Bernan Press and ProQuest have taken over the Statistical Abstract and have announced that they will produce a 2013 edition. The Statistical Abstract, published since 1878, has been the authoritative and comprehensive summary of statistics on the social, political and economic organization of the United States. It has been a convenient volume for statistical reference and a guide to sources of more information both in print and on the Web. For more information about the Statistical Abstract, view the 2012 edition online, and view ordering information, go to <https://www.census.gov/compendia/statab/>.
  CONNECT WITH US

Information Quality
                    Data Linkage Infrastructure
                    Data Protection and Privacy Policy
                    Accessibility      
                    FOIA
                    Inspector General
                    No FEAR Act
                    U.S. Department of Commerce
                    USA.gov
                   Measuring America's People, Places, and Economy
An official website of the United States government                

----

end of header

Census.govNewsroom

# Newsroom Archive

Skip left menu navigation                          - About the Newsroom
                          - Facts for Features
                          - **News Releases**
                          - Press Kits
                          - Tip Sheets

## Tallese D. Johnson

### Statistician, Racial Statistics Branch Population Division

Tallese D. Johnson is a statistician in the Racial Statistics Branch, Population Division, of the U.S. Census Bureau. Her duties include the review and analysis of race data, with a primary focus on the American Community Survey.  She joined the Census Bureau in 2004 as a statistician in the Fertility and Family Statistics Branch where her primary duties included the review and analysis of child care, child well-being and maternity leave data from the Survey of Income and Program Participation.

Before joining the Census Bureau, Johnson worked as a research associate for the Consortium on Race, Gender and Ethnicity at the University of Maryland. Johnson received an undergraduate degree in sociology from Berea College in Kentucky and both master's and doctorate degrees in sociology from the University of Maryland.  She also completed a postdoctoral fellowship at the University of North Carolina's Carolina Population Center.

CONNECT WITH US**********

                            - Information Quality
                            - Data Linkage Infrastructure
                            - Data Protection and Privacy Policy
                            - Accessibility
                            - FOIA
                            - Inspector General
                            - No FEAR Act
                            - U.S. Department of Commerce
                            - USA.gov

----

Measuring America's People, Places, and Economy

Is this page helpful?
YesNo

NO THANKS

255 characters maximum255 characters maximum reached

Thank you for your feedback.Comments or suggestions? 

PIO@census.gov
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE BALANCE
SHEET AND INCOME STATEMENT OF TYCOM LTD. AS OF AND FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED
JUNE 30, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                          18,800
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  399,300
<ALLOWANCES>                                    54,300
<INVENTORY>                                    130,600
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               829,600
<PP&E>                                         735,300
<DEPRECIATION>                                 191,100
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,850,400
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          964,300
<BONDS>                                        655,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     159,200
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,850,400
<SALES>                                      1,952,200
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,952,200
<CGS>                                        1,458,400
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,458,400
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                34,700
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              34,700
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                352,600
<INCOME-TAX>                                   128,700
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            223,900
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   223,900
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.50
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.50


</TABLE>
# C_2012330EN.01000301.xml

| 27.10.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 330/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.10.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 330/3

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

26 October 2012

2012/C 330/04

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,2908 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 103,15 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4592 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,80120 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 8,6730 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,2090 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 7,4675 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 24,900 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 281,99 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,6962 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,1503 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,5598 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,3288 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,2486 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,2865 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 10,0041 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,5740 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,5774 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 416,90 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 11,2745 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 8,0661 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,5380 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 12 448,82 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 3,9435 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 53,392 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 40,6150 |
| THB | Thai baht | 39,679 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 2,6148 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 16,8304 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 69,3590 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,2908

JPY

Japanese yen

103,15

DKK

Danish krone

7,4592

GBP

Pound sterling

0,80120

SEK

Swedish krona

8,6730

CHF

Swiss franc

1,2090

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

7,4675

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

24,900

HUF

Hungarian forint

281,99

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,6962

PLN

Polish zloty

4,1503

RON

Romanian leu

4,5598

TRY

Turkish lira

2,3288

AUD

Australian dollar

1,2486

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,2865

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

10,0041

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,5740

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,5774

KRW

South Korean won

1 416,90

ZAR

South African rand

11,2745

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

8,0661

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,5380

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

12 448,82

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

3,9435

PHP

Philippine peso

53,392

RUB

Russian rouble

40,6150

THB

Thai baht

39,679

BRL

Brazilian real

2,6148

MXN

Mexican peso

16,8304

INR

Indian rupee

69,3590

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
#### WRONO ENTERPRISE CORPORATION, Appellant, v. MSC, INC., et al., Appellees.

No. 72-1132.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Feb. 5, 1973.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002   In connection with the Quarterly Report of Energy Edge Technologies Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the fiscal year ended March  31, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), each of the undersigned officers of the Company certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to such officers knowledge:  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the dates and for the periods expressed in the Report.     Dated:  May 20, 2011 By:/s/ Robert Holdsworth Robert Holdsworth Acting Principal Financial Officer (Principal Executive and Financial Officer)
#### Franklin COX, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 67-738.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Third District.

March 5, 1968.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
Exhibit 31.1 CERTIFICATIONS  I, Peter Klamka, President, certify that:  1.   I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Plaster Caster Inc. 2.   Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report. 3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report. 4.   The registrants other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have; Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared; Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by this quarterly report (the registrants third fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and 5.   The registrants other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions); All significant deficiencies and material weakness in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.    Date:  May 16, 2011                                                                          /s/ Peter Klamka President
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION OF THE PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE
OFFICER

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002

(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)



Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as created
by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned Chief Executive Officer of Daniels Corporate Advisory, Inc. (the
“Company”) does hereby certify, to the best of such officer’s knowledge, that:



1. The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Daniels
Corporate Advisory Company, Inc. (the Company) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable,
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and



2. The information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Dated: July 16, 2018



|/s/ Arthur D. Viola         | 
|--------------------------- | 
|Chief Executive Officer     | 
|and Chief Financial Officer | 



The certifications set forth above are being
furnished as an exhibit solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and shall not be deemed to be “filed”
for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, nor shall they be deemed incorporated by reference
in any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.



A signed original of this written statement
required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed
form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Daniels Corporate Advisory
Company, Inc. and will be retained by Daniels Corporate Advisory Company, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or its staff upon request.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA 

TERRENCE K. WILLIAMSON, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

HILLARY RODHAM CLINTON, 

Defendant. 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) Civil Case No. 07-1471 (RJL) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

ORDER ~ 

For the reasons set forth in the Memorandum Opinion entered this ~ day of 

September, 2010, it is hereby 

ORDERED that the Motion for Summary Judgment by defendant Hillary 

Rodham Clinton [#17] is GRANTED; and it is further 

ORDERED that judgment be entered for the defendant on all counts in the 

Complaint. 

SO ORDERED. 

~ 

~~ United States District Judge 

12
ORDER OF MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION PANEL

Order Pronounced February 13, 2015 

THE MOTION TO STAY IN THE FOLLOWING CASE IS GRANTED: 

 

 

15-0113 IN RE CHESAPEAKE BARNETT ROYALTY LITIGATION 

 Defendants’ Chesapeake Energy Corporation, et al.’s joint request for stay, filed 

February 11, 2015, is granted. All trial court proceedings and discovery in the cases 

listed in Appendix A of the Motion to Transfer are stayed until further order of the MDL 

Panel.
# C_2015097EN.01001301.xml

| 24.3.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 97/13 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.3.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 97/13

---

Commission information notice pursuant to Article 16(4) of Regulation (EC) No 1008/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council on common rules for the operation of air services in the Community

Repeal of public service obligations in respect of scheduled air services

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2015/C 97/06)

| Member State | United Kingdom |
| --- | --- |
| Route concerned | Newquay Airport to Heathrow Airport
  Newquay Airport to Stansted Airport
  Newquay Airport to Luton Airport
  Newquay Airport to London City Airport
  Newquay Airport to Southend Airport |
| Original date of entry into force of the public service obligations | 8 August 2014 |
| Date of repeal | 22 January 2015 |
| Address where the text and any relevant information and/or documentation relating to the public service obligation can be obtained | For further information please contact:





  Ian Elston |
| Department for Transport |
| Great Minster House |
| 33 Horseferry Road |
| London |
| SW1P 4DR |
| UNITED KINGDOM |
| E-mail: ian.elston@dft.gsi.gov.uk |

Member State

United Kingdom

Route concerned

Newquay Airport to Heathrow Airport

Newquay Airport to Stansted Airport

Newquay Airport to Luton Airport

Newquay Airport to London City Airport

Newquay Airport to Southend Airport

Original date of entry into force of the public service obligations

8 August 2014

Date of repeal

22 January 2015

Address where the text and any relevant information and/or documentation relating to the public service obligation can be obtained

For further information please contact:

Ian Elston

Department for Transport

Great Minster House

33 Horseferry Road

London

SW1P 4DR

UNITED KINGDOM

E-mail: ian.elston@dft.gsi.gov.uk

---
#### Ronald J. HAYDEL v. Philip Henry CLARK et al.

No. 60417.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Oct. 28, 1977.

In re: Philip Henry Clark and Benny G. Williams applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, Parish of Terrebonne, 347 So.2d 1200.

Writ denied. Judgment of the Court of Appeal is correct.