# C_2015409EN.01000101.xml

| 9.12.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 409/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.12.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 409/1

---

Summary of results from the Court’s 2014 annual audits of the European Agencies and other bodies

(2015/C 409/01)

CONTENTS

CONTENTS

| | Paragraph | Page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| INTRODUCTION | 1 | 2 |
| INFORMATION IN SUPPORT OF THE COURT’S OPINIONS | 13 | 3 |
| AUDIT RESULTS | | 3 |
| Opinions on the reliability of the accounts | 17 | 3 |
| Opinions on the legality and regularity of the transactions underlying the accounts | 19 | 4 |
| Comments not calling the Court’s opinions into question | 21 | 4 |
| Comments on the reliability of accounts | 23 | 4 |
| Comments on the legality and regularity of transactions | 24 | 5 |
| Comments on internal controls | 25 | 5 |
| Comments on budget implementation | 26 | 5 |
| Other comments | 29 | 5 |
| Follow-up of previous years’ comments | 32 | 5 |
| CONCLUSIONS | 33 | 6 |
| ANNEX I — | Agencies’ Income (Budget forecasts, entitlements established and amounts received) and Staff establishments plans |

Paragraph

Paragraph

Page

Page

INTRODUCTION

1

2

INFORMATION IN SUPPORT OF THE COURT’S OPINIONS

13

3

AUDIT RESULTS

3

Opinions on the reliability of the accounts

17

3

Opinions on the legality and regularity of the transactions underlying the accounts

19

4

Comments not calling the Court’s opinions into question

21

4

Comments on the reliability of accounts

23

4

Comments on the legality and regularity of transactions

24

5

Comments on internal controls

25

5

Comments on budget implementation

26

5

Other comments

29

5

Follow-up of previous years’ comments

32

5

CONCLUSIONS

33

6

ANNEX I —

Agencies’ Income (Budget forecasts, entitlements established and amounts received) and Staff establishments plans

7

| ANNEX II — | Comments made by the Court in 2014, not calling its opinion into question |
| --- | --- |

ANNEX II —

Comments made by the Court in 2014, not calling its opinion into question

12

| ANNEX III — | Follow-up of open 2012 and 2013 comments not calling the Court’s opinions into question |
| --- | --- |

ANNEX III —

Follow-up of open 2012 and 2013 comments not calling the Court’s opinions into question

15

INTRODUCTION

INTRODUCTION

| 1. | Pursuant to the provisions of Article 287 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, the Court has issued an opinion on the reliability of the accounts and on the legality and regularity of the underlying transactions, for the financial year ended 31 December 2014, for each of the 32 regulatory agencies, six executive agencies, the Euratom Supply Agency (Euratom), the European Institute of Innovation and Technology (EIT) and the Europol Pension Fund (see Table). |
| --- | --- |

1.

Pursuant to the provisions of Article 287 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, the Court has issued an opinion on the reliability of the accounts and on the legality and regularity of the underlying transactions, for the financial year ended 31 December 2014, for each of the 32 regulatory agencies, six executive agencies, the Euratom Supply Agency (Euratom), the European Institute of Innovation and Technology (EIT) and the Europol Pension Fund (see Table).

Table

| 2. | As in prior years the Court has audited the legality and regularity of the transactions. However, 2014 is the first year whereby the annual accounts of the 30 Union-subsidised regulatory agencies and EIT were verified by an independent external auditor (audit firm) according to Article 208(4) (1) of the new EU Financial Regulation and Article 107(1) (2) of the new framework financial Regulation for agencies. The Court’s opinion on these accounts considered the audit work performed by the independent external auditor and the action taken in response to the auditor’s findings. |
| --- | --- |

2.

As in prior years the Court has audited the legality and regularity of the transactions. However, 2014 is the first year whereby the annual accounts of the 30 Union-subsidised regulatory agencies and EIT were verified by an independent external auditor (audit firm) according to Article 208(4) (1) of the new EU Financial Regulation and Article 107(1) (2) of the new framework financial Regulation for agencies. The Court’s opinion on these accounts considered the audit work performed by the independent external auditor and the action taken in response to the auditor’s findings.

1

2

| 3. | For the Euratom Supply Agency, two fully self-financed agencies (OHIM and CPVO), the six executive agencies and the Europol Pension Fund (EPF), the Court carried out its own audit work on the annual accounts.

  Table


  Audit arrangements by cluster | Agencies audited by the Court | Audited by ECA only | Audited by ECA + external auditor | Total |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Regulatory Agencies | Union-subsidised agencies | — | 30 | 32 |
| Self-financed agencies — OHIM and CPVO | 2 | — |
| Executive agencies | EACEA, REA, ERCEA, EASME, INEA and CHAFEA | 6 | — | 6 |
| Other bodies | Euratom and EPF | 2 | — | 3 |
| EIT | — | 1 |
| Total | | 10 | 31 | 41 |

3.

For the Euratom Supply Agency, two fully self-financed agencies (OHIM and CPVO), the six executive agencies and the Europol Pension Fund (EPF), the Court carried out its own audit work on the annual accounts.

Table

Table

Audit arrangements by cluster

Audit arrangements by cluster

Agencies audited by the Court

Audited by ECA only

Audited by ECA + external auditor

Total

Regulatory Agencies

Union-subsidised agencies

—

30

30

32

32

Self-financed agencies — OHIM and CPVO

2

2

—

Executive agencies

EACEA, REA, ERCEA, EASME, INEA and CHAFEA

6

6

—

6

6

Other bodies

Euratom and EPF

2

2

—

3

3

EIT

—

1

1

Total

Total

10

10

31

31

41

41

| 4. | Details on the audited agencies, their budgets and staff are provided in Annex I. |
| --- | --- |

4.

Details on the audited agencies, their budgets and staff are provided in Annex I.

Annex I

| 5. | This summary provides an overview of the results of the Court’s annual audits of the agencies for the financial year 2014. It aims to facilitate the analysis and comparison of the Court’s specific reports. The Court’s opinions and comments as well as the agencies’ replies can be found in the Specific Annual Reports (SAR). This summary is not an audit report or opinion. |
| --- | --- |

5.

This summary provides an overview of the results of the Court’s annual audits of the agencies for the financial year 2014. It aims to facilitate the analysis and comparison of the Court’s specific reports. The Court’s opinions and comments as well as the agencies’ replies can be found in the Specific Annual Reports (SAR). This summary is not an audit report or opinion.

| 6. | Decentralised agencies play an important role in implementing EU policies, especially tasks of a technical, scientific, operational and/or regulatory nature. Their aim is to allow the Commission to concentrate on policy-making and to reinforce cooperation between the EU and national governments by pooling technical and specialist expertise from both sides. They are located throughout the EU. |
| --- | --- |

6.

Decentralised agencies play an important role in implementing EU policies, especially tasks of a technical, scientific, operational and/or regulatory nature. Their aim is to allow the Commission to concentrate on policy-making and to reinforce cooperation between the EU and national governments by pooling technical and specialist expertise from both sides. They are located throughout the EU.

| 7. | The six executive agencies are entrusted with tasks relating to the management of one or more Union programmes and are set up for fixed periods of times. They are located in Brussels (five) or Luxembourg (one). |
| --- | --- |

7.

The six executive agencies are entrusted with tasks relating to the management of one or more Union programmes and are set up for fixed periods of times. They are located in Brussels (five) or Luxembourg (one).

| 8. | EIT in Budapest is an independent, decentralised EU body which pools scientific, business and education resources to boost the Union’s innovation capacity. |
| --- | --- |

8.

EIT in Budapest is an independent, decentralised EU body which pools scientific, business and education resources to boost the Union’s innovation capacity.

| 9. | Euratom in Luxembourg was created to support the aims of the European Atomic Energy Community Treaty. |
| --- | --- |

9.

Euratom in Luxembourg was created to support the aims of the European Atomic Energy Community Treaty.

| 10. | The Europol Pension Fund, which is located in The Hague, was established to finance and pay pensions for staff employed by Europol before it became a European Agency on 1 January 2010. |
| --- | --- |

10.

The Europol Pension Fund, which is located in The Hague, was established to finance and pay pensions for staff employed by Europol before it became a European Agency on 1 January 2010.

| 11. | The agencies’ total 2014 budget amounted to some 1,9 billion euro (2013: 2 billion euro) or about 1,4 % of the 2014 EU general budget (2013: 1,4 %). Approximately 1,2 billion euro comes from the European Commission’s subsidies and the rest is income from fees and other sources. The agencies employ 6  578 (2013: 6  536) permanent and temporary officials or 14 % (2013: 14 %) of total EU officials authorised under the EU general budget (staff establishment plan). In addition, some 3  200 (2013: 2  900) other staff are working for the agencies (contractual or seconded staff). The increase in staff is primarily concentrated in those agencies assigned additional tasks, those with supervisory responsibility for the financial industry, and the executive agencies with additional responsibilities under Horizon 2020 and other programmes. |
| --- | --- |

11.

The agencies’ total 2014 budget amounted to some 1,9 billion euro (2013: 2 billion euro) or about 1,4 % of the 2014 EU general budget (2013: 1,4 %). Approximately 1,2 billion euro comes from the European Commission’s subsidies and the rest is income from fees and other sources. The agencies employ 6  578 (2013: 6  536) permanent and temporary officials or 14 % (2013: 14 %) of total EU officials authorised under the EU general budget (staff establishment plan). In addition, some 3  200 (2013: 2  900) other staff are working for the agencies (contractual or seconded staff). The increase in staff is primarily concentrated in those agencies assigned additional tasks, those with supervisory responsibility for the financial industry, and the executive agencies with additional responsibilities under Horizon 2020 and other programmes.

| 12. | Whereas financial risk related to the agencies is relatively low compared to the total EU budget, the reputational risk for the Union is high. Nevertheless, the agencies are highly visible in the Member States and they have significant influence on policy and decision making and programme implementation in areas of vital importance to European citizens, i.e. health, safety, security, freedom and justice. |
| --- | --- |

12.

Whereas financial risk related to the agencies is relatively low compared to the total EU budget, the reputational risk for the Union is high. Nevertheless, the agencies are highly visible in the Member States and they have significant influence on policy and decision making and programme implementation in areas of vital importance to European citizens, i.e. health, safety, security, freedom and justice.

INFORMATION IN SUPPORT OF THE COURT’S OPINIONS

INFORMATION IN SUPPORT OF THE COURT’S OPINIONS

| 13. | Regarding the 31 agencies audited by an independent external auditor, the Court has reviewed the work of the audit firms in accordance with international audit standards. In forming its opinion on the reliability of the accounts expressed in the SARs, the Court took into account the audit firms’ work. |
| --- | --- |

13.

Regarding the 31 agencies audited by an independent external auditor, the Court has reviewed the work of the audit firms in accordance with international audit standards. In forming its opinion on the reliability of the accounts expressed in the SARs, the Court took into account the audit firms’ work.

| 14. | There is adequate assurance for the Court to base its own audit opinions on the reliability of the accounts using the private audit firms’ work. |
| --- | --- |

14.

There is adequate assurance for the Court to base its own audit opinions on the reliability of the accounts using the private audit firms’ work.

| 15. | Regarding the legality and regularity of transactions, for which the Court remains exclusively responsible, the audit approach comprises analytical audit procedures, direct testing of transactions and an assessment of the agencies’ internal controls. |
| --- | --- |

15.

Regarding the legality and regularity of transactions, for which the Court remains exclusively responsible, the audit approach comprises analytical audit procedures, direct testing of transactions and an assessment of the agencies’ internal controls.

| 16. | For the remaining 10 agencies, the Court continued to perform the audit of both the legality and regularity of the underlying transactions and the reliability of the accounts. |
| --- | --- |

16.

For the remaining 10 agencies, the Court continued to perform the audit of both the legality and regularity of the underlying transactions and the reliability of the accounts.

AUDIT RESULTS

AUDIT RESULTS

Opinions on the reliability of the accounts

Opinions on the reliability of the accounts

| 17. | The final accounts of the 41 agencies present fairly, in all material respects, their financial position as at 31 December 2014 and the results of their operations and their cash flows for the year then ended, in accordance with the provisions of the applicable Financial Regulations and the accounting rules adopted by the Commission’s Accounting Officer. |
| --- | --- |

17.

The final accounts of the 41 agencies present fairly, in all material respects, their financial position as at 31 December 2014 and the results of their operations and their cash flows for the year then ended, in accordance with the provisions of the applicable Financial Regulations and the accounting rules adopted by the Commission’s Accounting Officer.

| 18. | The Court included emphasis of matter (3) paragraphs in relation to the reliability of the accounts of European Agency for the operational management of large-scale IT systems in the area of freedom, security and justice (eu-LISA) and the EPF. In the case of eu-LISA, the situation to which the Court drew attention in its 2013 SAR continues, namely the need for reliable and complete data for the valuation of the agency’s core information systems, including the costs of hardware, off-the-shelf software and software development. These assets are being depreciated and while still material for 2014, the amount involved is decreasing each year. In the case of the EPF, the Court drew attention to the fact that the EPF’s 2014 accounts were prepared on a going concern basis whereas it is expected that by the end of 2015 there will be no active participants and the liquidation of the Fund is currently being assessed. |
| --- | --- |

18.

The Court included emphasis of matter (3) paragraphs in relation to the reliability of the accounts of European Agency for the operational management of large-scale IT systems in the area of freedom, security and justice (eu-LISA) and the EPF. In the case of eu-LISA, the situation to which the Court drew attention in its 2013 SAR continues, namely the need for reliable and complete data for the valuation of the agency’s core information systems, including the costs of hardware, off-the-shelf software and software development. These assets are being depreciated and while still material for 2014, the amount involved is decreasing each year. In the case of the EPF, the Court drew attention to the fact that the EPF’s 2014 accounts were prepared on a going concern basis whereas it is expected that by the end of 2015 there will be no active participants and the liquidation of the Fund is currently being assessed.

3

Opinions on the legality and regularity of the transactions underlying the accounts

Opinions on the legality and regularity of the transactions underlying the accounts

| 19. | The Court concluded that for the 41 agencies, the transactions underlying the annual accounts for the year ended 31 December 2014 were legal and regular in all material respects. |
| --- | --- |

19.

The Court concluded that for the 41 agencies, the transactions underlying the annual accounts for the year ended 31 December 2014 were legal and regular in all material respects.

| 20. | The Court included an emphasis of matter paragraph in relation to the legality and regularity of the transactions underlying the accounts of EIT. The grant agreements signed under the Framework Partnership Agreements (FPA) with the three first ‘Knowledge and Innovation Communities’ (KICs) stipulate that the EIT financial contribution may not exceed 25 % of the KIC’s global expenditure over the first five years, from 1 January 2010 to 31 December 2014. |
| --- | --- |

20.

The Court included an emphasis of matter paragraph in relation to the legality and regularity of the transactions underlying the accounts of EIT. The grant agreements signed under the Framework Partnership Agreements (FPA) with the three first ‘Knowledge and Innovation Communities’ (KICs) stipulate that the EIT financial contribution may not exceed 25 % of the KIC’s global expenditure over the first five years, from 1 January 2010 to 31 December 2014.

Comments not calling the Court’s opinions into question

Comments not calling the Court’s opinions into question

| 21. | Without calling its opinions into question, the Court made a total of 79 comments (2013: 97) affecting 35 agencies (2013: 35) to highlight matters of importance and to indicate room for improvement. Comments were made regarding the reliability of accounts, the legality and regularity of transactions, internal controls, budget implementation and other matters such as sound financial management.

  Chart


  Number of comments by heading





  Source: Specific reports on the agencies 2014 annual accounts. |
| --- | --- |

21.

Without calling its opinions into question, the Court made a total of 79 comments (2013: 97) affecting 35 agencies (2013: 35) to highlight matters of importance and to indicate room for improvement. Comments were made regarding the reliability of accounts, the legality and regularity of transactions, internal controls, budget implementation and other matters such as sound financial management.

Chart

Chart

Number of comments by heading

Number of comments by heading

Image

Source: Specific reports on the agencies 2014 annual accounts.

Source

| 22. | An overview of the comments made for each of the agencies is provided in Annex II. A summary of the most frequent comments and/or those comments of particular relevance is provided below. |
| --- | --- |

22.

An overview of the comments made for each of the agencies is provided in Annex II. A summary of the most frequent comments and/or those comments of particular relevance is provided below.

Annex II

Comment on the reliability of accounts

Comment on the reliability of accounts

| 23. | In addition to the two emphasis of matter paragraphs previously noted, there was one comment on the reliability of the accounts affecting European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) that addresses the disclosure of revenue based on estimated amounts rather than actual amounts. |
| --- | --- |

23.

In addition to the two emphasis of matter paragraphs previously noted, there was one comment on the reliability of the accounts affecting European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) that addresses the disclosure of revenue based on estimated amounts rather than actual amounts.

Comments on the legality and regularity of transactions

Comments on the legality and regularity of transactions

| 24. | The five comments (2013: seven) in this category affect five agencies (2013: seven) and relate to weaknesses in procurement procedures regarding the clarity of the tender technical specifications and the timeliness of the calls for tender; weaknesses in grant controls and compliance with regulatory dates for the collection of fees. |
| --- | --- |

24.

The five comments (2013: seven) in this category affect five agencies (2013: seven) and relate to weaknesses in procurement procedures regarding the clarity of the tender technical specifications and the timeliness of the calls for tender; weaknesses in grant controls and compliance with regulatory dates for the collection of fees.

Comments on internal controls

Comments on internal controls

| 25. | The seven comments (2013: 17) affect seven agencies (2013: 10). In two cases they relate to weaknesses in grant controls (2013: two) and in another case to weaknesses in controls over assets (2013: two); the other comments refer to different internal control shortcomings. Overall, there has been a significant improvement in internal control. Comments decreased by more than 50 % and there are no comments related to non-implementation of internal control standards (ICS). |
| --- | --- |

25.

The seven comments (2013: 17) affect seven agencies (2013: 10). In two cases they relate to weaknesses in grant controls (2013: two) and in another case to weaknesses in controls over assets (2013: two); the other comments refer to different internal control shortcomings. Overall, there has been a significant improvement in internal control. Comments decreased by more than 50 % and there are no comments related to non-implementation of internal control standards (ICS).

Comments on budget implementation

Comments on budget implementation

| 26. | A high level of carry-overs of committed appropriations remains the most frequent comment in this area and affected 28 agencies (2013: 24). Although it is usually considered to be at odds with the budgetary principle of annuality and can indicate weaknesses in budget planning and implementation, it often resulted from events (partly) beyond the agencies’ control (e.g. invoices or cost declarations that had not been received by the year end) or were justified by the multiannual nature of operations, procurement procedures or projects. |
| --- | --- |

26.

A high level of carry-overs of committed appropriations remains the most frequent comment in this area and affected 28 agencies (2013: 24). Although it is usually considered to be at odds with the budgetary principle of annuality and can indicate weaknesses in budget planning and implementation, it often resulted from events (partly) beyond the agencies’ control (e.g. invoices or cost declarations that had not been received by the year end) or were justified by the multiannual nature of operations, procurement procedures or projects.

| 27. | High rates of cancellation of carry-overs from previous years were noted in eight cases (2013: seven). Such cancellations indicate that the appropriations carried over were made on the basis of over-estimated needs or were otherwise not justified. |
| --- | --- |

27.

High rates of cancellation of carry-overs from previous years were noted in eight cases (2013: seven). Such cancellations indicate that the appropriations carried over were made on the basis of over-estimated needs or were otherwise not justified.

| 28. | There are three comments on insufficient commitments (2013: six) and one comment on high budget transfers (2013: three). |
| --- | --- |

28.

There are three comments on insufficient commitments (2013: six) and one comment on high budget transfers (2013: three).

Other comments

Other comments

| 29. | There was a total of 22 other comments (2013: 22) made in respect of 17 agencies (2013: 15), of which seven relate to matters of sound financial management. Four of the seven observations related to weaknesses in procurement and contract management: the accumulation of significant overheads and profits; insufficient competition on price due to excessive concentration on quality; planned objective and activities not sufficiently specific to justify the procurement decision; and poor planning to replace an existing contract which affected fair competition. |
| --- | --- |

29.

There was a total of 22 other comments (2013: 22) made in respect of 17 agencies (2013: 15), of which seven relate to matters of sound financial management. Four of the seven observations related to weaknesses in procurement and contract management: the accumulation of significant overheads and profits; insufficient competition on price due to excessive concentration on quality; planned objective and activities not sufficiently specific to justify the procurement decision; and poor planning to replace an existing contract which affected fair competition.

| 30. | During the audit of one agency, a miscalculation in salaries, resulting in the underpayment of some EU staff recruited before the application of the 2004 Staff Regulations was detected by the Court. Following further checks requested by the Court the same problem was found in 18 other agencies (total underpayments some 3 78  670 euro). However the sums involved were only significant for six agencies and thus specifically mentioned in the relevant SAR. A difference of opinion exists between the agencies and the PMO as to where responsibility for the error lies. |
| --- | --- |

30.

During the audit of one agency, a miscalculation in salaries, resulting in the underpayment of some EU staff recruited before the application of the 2004 Staff Regulations was detected by the Court. Following further checks requested by the Court the same problem was found in 18 other agencies (total underpayments some 3 78  670 euro). However the sums involved were only significant for six agencies and thus specifically mentioned in the relevant SAR. A difference of opinion exists between the agencies and the PMO as to where responsibility for the error lies.

| 31. | The European Environment Agency (EEA) contracted backup services with a cloud services provider using an interinstitutional contract procured by DIGIT. The conditions of the contract did not ensure that the privileges and immunities of the European Communities, which are applicable to the Agency, were guaranteed, nor that the privacy guarantees granted by Article 7 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights to citizens of the European Union are respected. It is likely that other agencies will use such services in future. It is important that they ensure that such services provide full protection of the privileges and immunities necessary for the performance of the Agency and privacy of EU citizens. |
| --- | --- |

31.

The European Environment Agency (EEA) contracted backup services with a cloud services provider using an interinstitutional contract procured by DIGIT. The conditions of the contract did not ensure that the privileges and immunities of the European Communities, which are applicable to the Agency, were guaranteed, nor that the privacy guarantees granted by Article 7 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights to citizens of the European Union are respected. It is likely that other agencies will use such services in future. It is important that they ensure that such services provide full protection of the privileges and immunities necessary for the performance of the Agency and privacy of EU citizens.

Follow-up of previous years’ comments

Follow-up of previous years’ comments

| 32. | The 2014 specific annual reports provide an overview of follow-up actions taken by the agencies in response to open comments from previous years. Annex III shows that for the 153 comments open at the end of 2013, corrective action was completed during 2014 in 51 cases; remained ongoing in 41 cases; and six comments remained outstanding. No corrective action was required for 55 comments, mainly in relation to justified budget carry-overs. |
| --- | --- |

32.

The 2014 specific annual reports provide an overview of follow-up actions taken by the agencies in response to open comments from previous years. Annex III shows that for the 153 comments open at the end of 2013, corrective action was completed during 2014 in 51 cases; remained ongoing in 41 cases; and six comments remained outstanding. No corrective action was required for 55 comments, mainly in relation to justified budget carry-overs.

Annex III

CONCLUSIONS

CONCLUSIONS

| 33. | All agencies have produced reliable accounts. The Court expressed two emphases of matter for eu-LISA and EPF. |
| --- | --- |

33.

All agencies have produced reliable accounts. The Court expressed two emphases of matter for eu-LISA and EPF.

| 34. | The Court concluded that transactions underlying the accounts were legal and regular for all agencies and expressed one emphasis of matter for EIT. |
| --- | --- |

34.

The Court concluded that transactions underlying the accounts were legal and regular for all agencies and expressed one emphasis of matter for EIT.

| 35. | There was one comment in respect of the EEA’s use of cloud services. |
| --- | --- |

35.

There was one comment in respect of the EEA’s use of cloud services.

| 36. | There were six observations related to underpayments of EU staff recruited before the application of the 2004 Staff Regulations. |
| --- | --- |

36.

There were six observations related to underpayments of EU staff recruited before the application of the 2004 Staff Regulations.

| 37. | Agencies further improved their procedures by taking corrective action in response to the Court’s comments from previous years. Nevertheless, there is still room for improvement, as indicated by the number of comments made in 2014. |
| --- | --- |

37.

Agencies further improved their procedures by taking corrective action in response to the Court’s comments from previous years. Nevertheless, there is still room for improvement, as indicated by the number of comments made in 2014.

---

(1)  Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 966/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council (OJ L 298, 26.10.2012, p. 1).

1

(2)  Article 107 of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) No 1271/2013 (OJ L 328, 7.12.2013, p. 42).

2

(3)  An Emphasis of Matter paragraph is used to draw readers’ attention to a matter which is not materially misstated in the accounts, but is of such importance that it is fundamental to users’ understanding of the accounts.

3

---

ANNEX I

Agencies' Income (Budget forecasts, entitlements established and amounts received) and Staff establishments plans

| | 2014 | 2013 |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Agency | Parent DG | Policy Area | Forecasted Income budget (1) | Entitlements established (1) | Amounts received (1) | Staff establishment plan (2) | Forecasted Income budget (1) | Entitlements established (1) | Amounts received (1) | Staff establishment plan (2) |
| (million euro) | (million euro) | (million euro) | (million euro) | (million euro) | (million euro) |
| Regulatory Agencies |
| European Medicines Agency — EMA | SANCO | Health and Consumer Protection | 282 | 311 | 272 | 599 | 252 | 269 | 240 | 611 |
| Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market — OHIM | MARKT | Internal Market | 194 | 196 | 196 | 844 | 418 | 189 | 189 | 861 |
| European Aviation Safety Agency — EASA | MOVE | Mobility and Transport | 162 | 145 | 137 | 685 | 151 | 125 | 125 | 692 |
| European Agency for the Management of Operational Cooperation at the External Borders — FRONTEX | HOME | Home Affairs | 98 | 87 | 87 | 152 | 94 | 92 | 92 | 153 |
| European Police Office — EUROPOL | HOME | Home Affairs | 84 | 85 | 85 | 450 | 83 | 83 | 83 | 457 |
| European Food Safety Authority — EFSA | SANCO | Health and Consumer Protection | 80 | 80 | 80 | 344 | 76 | 76 | 76 | 351 |
| European Maritime Safety Agency — EMSA | MOVE | Mobility and Transport | 58 | 58 | 58 | 210 | 57 | 58 | 56 | 213 |
| European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control — ECDC | SANCO | Health and Consumer Protection | 60 | 59 | 59 | 194 | 58 | 59 | 59 | 198 |
| Translations Centre for the Bodies of the EU — CDT | LANGUAGE | Language Services | 56 | 48 | 47 | 203 | 52 | 54 | 50 | 206 |
| European Environment Agency — EEA | ENV-CLIM | Environment | 43 | 53 | 52 | 135 | 49 | 63 | 63 | 138 |
| European Body for the Enhancement of Judicial Cooperation — EUROJUST | HOME | Justice | 34 | 34 | 34 | 209 | 32 | 32 | 32 | 213 |
| European Chemicals Agency — ECHA | ENTERPRISE AND INDUSTRY | Enterprise | 33 | 37 | 37 | 495 | 99 | 98 | 98 | 503 |
| European Railway Agency — ERA | MOVE | Mobility and Transport | 26 | 26 | 26 | 140 | 26 | 26 | 26 | 143 |
| European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights — FRA | JUSTICE | Justice | 21 | 21 | 21 | 75 | 22 | 22 | 22 | 78 |
| European Banking Authority — EBA | MARKT | Internal Market | 34 | 34 | 34 | 111 | 26 | 26 | 26 | 93 |
| European foundation for improvement of living & working conditions — EUROFOUND | EMPL | Employment and Social Affairs | 21 | 21 | 21 | 99 | 21 | 21 | 21 | 101 |
| European Training Foundation — ETF | EAC | Education and Culture | 20 | 21 | 21 | 94 | 20 | 22 | 22 | 96 |
| European Securities and Markets Authority — ESMA | MARKT | Internal Market | 33 | 32 | 32 | 133 | 28 | 30 | 30 | 121 |
| European Centre for the Development of Vocational Training — CEDEFOP | EAC | Education and Culture | 18 | 17 | 17 | 98 | 19 | 18 | 18 | 100 |
| European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority — EIOPA | MARKT | Internal Market | 22 | 22 | 22 | 87 | 19 | 18 | 18 | 80 |
| European Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction — EMCDDA | HOME | Home Affairs | 15 | 16 | 16 | 82 | 16 | 16 | 16 | 84 |
| European Agency for Safety and Health at Work — EU-OSHA | EMPL | Employment and Social Affairs | 15 | 15 | 15 | 43 | 15 | 16 | 16 | 44 |
| Community Plant Variety Office — CPVO | SANCO | Agriculture and Rural Development | 15 | 13 | 13 | 47 | 14 | 13 | 13 | 48 |
| European GNSS Agency — GSA | ENTERPRISE AND INDUSTRY | Enterprise | 25 | 358 | 358 | 96 | 14 | 54 | 54 | 77 |
| European Fisheries Control Agency — EFCA | MARE | Maritime Affairs & Fisheries | 9 | 9 | 9 | 53 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 54 |
| European Institute for Gender equality — EIGE | JUSTICE | Justice | 7 | 7 | 7 | 29 | 7 | 8 | 8 | 30 |
| European Police College — CEPOL | HOME | Home Affairs | 9 | 9 | 9 | 27 | 8 | 9 | 9 | 28 |
| European Network and Information Security Agency — ENISA | INFSO | Information Society and Media | 10 | 10 | 10 | 48 | 10 | 10 | 9 | 47 |
| European Agency for the Cooperation of Energy Regulators — ACER | ENER | Energy | 11 | 11 | 11 | 54 | 12 | 12 | 12 | 49 |
| European Asylum Support Office — EASO | HOME | Home Affairs | 16 | 13 | 13 | 51 | 11 | 10 | 10 | 45 |
| Office of the body of European Regulators for Electronic Communications — BEREC | INFSO | Information Society and Media | 4 | 4 | 4 | 16 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 16 |
| European Agency for the Operational Management of Large-Scale IT Systems in the Area of Freedom, Security and Justice — eu-LISA | HOME | Home Affairs | 65 | 57 | 57 | 120 | 34 | 19 | 19 | 120 |
| Executive Agencies |
| Education, Audiovisual and Culture Executive Agency — EACEA | EAC | Education and Culture | 47 | 47 | 47 | 108 | 51 | 52 | 52 | 105 |
| Research Executive Agency — REA | RTD | Research and Innovation | 52 | 52 | 52 | 145 | 47 | 47 | 47 | 140 |
| European Research Council Executive Agency — ERCEA | RTD | Research and Innovation | 36 | 36 | 36 | 100 | 40 | 40 | 40 | 100 |
| Executive Agency for Small and Medium-sized Enterprises — EASME (previously EACI) | ENER | Energy, Entrepreneurship and Innovation | 24 | 25 | 25 | 77 | 16 | 16 | 16 | 37 |
| Innovation and Networks Executive Agency — INEA (previously TEN-TEA) | MOVE | Mobility and Transport | 13 | 14 | 14 | 49 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 33 |
| Consumers, Health, Agriculture and Food Executive Agency — CHAFEA (previously EAHC) | SANCO | Consumer Protection | 7 | 7 | 7 | 12 | 7 | 7 | 7 | 12 |
| Other Bodies |
| European Institute of Innovation and Technology — EIT | EAC | Innovation and Technology | 175 | 167 | 167 | 39 | 99 | 97 | 97 | 34 |
| Euratom Supply Agency (3) — EURATOM | ENER & RTD | Energy and Innovation | 0,1 | 0,1 | 0,1 | 25 | 0,1 | 0,1 | 0,1 | 25 |
| Europol Pension Fund — EPF | HOME | Administrative Expenditure of Europol | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a |
| Total | 1  934 | 2  257 | 2  208 | 6  578 | 2  026 | 1  830 | 1  794 | 6  536 |
| | | | | | | 2014 | 2013 | | | |
| | Commission subsidy part in agencies’ income: | 60,5 % | 51,9 % | | | |
| | Agencies’ forecasted income budget in comparison with EU general budget: | 1,4 % | 1,4 % | | | |
| | Agencies’ staff establishment plan in comparison with total under the EU general budget: | 14,1 % | 14,0 % | | | |

2014

2013

Agency

Parent DG

Policy Area

Forecasted Income budget (1)

Entitlements established (1)

Amounts received (1)

Staff establishment plan (2)

Forecasted Income budget (1)

Entitlements established (1)

Amounts received (1)

Staff establishment plan (2)

(million euro)

(million euro)

(million euro)

(million euro)

(million euro)

(million euro)

Regulatory Agencies

European Medicines Agency — EMA

SANCO

Health and Consumer Protection

282

311

272

599

252

269

240

611

Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market — OHIM

MARKT

Internal Market

194

196

196

844

418

189

189

861

European Aviation Safety Agency — EASA

MOVE

Mobility and Transport

162

145

137

685

151

125

125

692

European Agency for the Management of Operational Cooperation at the External Borders — FRONTEX

HOME

Home Affairs

98

87

87

152

94

92

92

153

European Police Office — EUROPOL

HOME

Home Affairs

84

85

85

450

83

83

83

457

European Food Safety Authority — EFSA

SANCO

Health and Consumer Protection

80

80

80

344

76

76

76

351

European Maritime Safety Agency — EMSA

MOVE

Mobility and Transport

58

58

58

210

57

58

56

213

European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control — ECDC

SANCO

Health and Consumer Protection

60

59

59

194

58

59

59

198

Translations Centre for the Bodies of the EU — CDT

LANGUAGE

Language Services

56

48

47

203

52

54

50

206

European Environment Agency — EEA

ENV-CLIM

Environment

43

53

52

135

49

63

63

138

European Body for the Enhancement of Judicial Cooperation — EUROJUST

HOME

Justice

34

34

34

209

32

32

32

213

European Chemicals Agency — ECHA

ENTERPRISE AND INDUSTRY

Enterprise

33

37

37

495

99

98

98

503

European Railway Agency — ERA

MOVE

Mobility and Transport

26

26

26

140

26

26

26

143

European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights — FRA

JUSTICE

Justice

21

21

21

75

22

22

22

78

European Banking Authority — EBA

MARKT

Internal Market

34

34

34

111

26

26

26

93

European foundation for improvement of living & working conditions — EUROFOUND

EMPL

Employment and Social Affairs

21

21

21

99

21

21

21

101

European Training Foundation — ETF

EAC

Education and Culture

20

21

21

94

20

22

22

96

European Securities and Markets Authority — ESMA

MARKT

Internal Market

33

32

32

133

28

30

30

121

European Centre for the Development of Vocational Training — CEDEFOP

EAC

Education and Culture

18

17

17

98

19

18

18

100

European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority — EIOPA

MARKT

Internal Market

22

22

22

87

19

18

18

80

European Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction — EMCDDA

HOME

Home Affairs

15

16

16

82

16

16

16

84

European Agency for Safety and Health at Work — EU-OSHA

EMPL

Employment and Social Affairs

15

15

15

43

15

16

16

44

Community Plant Variety Office — CPVO

SANCO

Agriculture and Rural Development

15

13

13

47

14

13

13

48

European GNSS Agency — GSA

ENTERPRISE AND INDUSTRY

Enterprise

25

358

358

96

14

54

54

77

European Fisheries Control Agency — EFCA

MARE

Maritime Affairs & Fisheries

9

9

9

53

9

9

9

54

European Institute for Gender equality — EIGE

JUSTICE

Justice

7

7

7

29

7

8

8

30

European Police College — CEPOL

HOME

Home Affairs

9

9

9

27

8

9

9

28

European Network and Information Security Agency — ENISA

INFSO

Information Society and Media

10

10

10

48

10

10

9

47

European Agency for the Cooperation of Energy Regulators — ACER

ENER

Energy

11

11

11

54

12

12

12

49

European Asylum Support Office — EASO

HOME

Home Affairs

16

13

13

51

11

10

10

45

Office of the body of European Regulators for Electronic Communications — BEREC

INFSO

Information Society and Media

4

4

4

16

4

4

4

16

European Agency for the Operational Management of Large-Scale IT Systems in the Area of Freedom, Security and Justice — eu-LISA

HOME

Home Affairs

65

57

57

120

34

19

19

120

Executive Agencies

Education, Audiovisual and Culture Executive Agency — EACEA

EAC

Education and Culture

47

47

47

108

51

52

52

105

Research Executive Agency — REA

RTD

Research and Innovation

52

52

52

145

47

47

47

140

European Research Council Executive Agency — ERCEA

RTD

Research and Innovation

36

36

36

100

40

40

40

100

Executive Agency for Small and Medium-sized Enterprises — EASME (previously EACI)

ENER

Energy, Entrepreneurship and Innovation

24

25

25

77

16

16

16

37

Innovation and Networks Executive Agency — INEA (previously TEN-TEA)

MOVE

Mobility and Transport

13

14

14

49

10

10

10

33

Consumers, Health, Agriculture and Food Executive Agency — CHAFEA (previously EAHC)

SANCO

Consumer Protection

7

7

7

12

7

7

7

12

Other Bodies

European Institute of Innovation and Technology — EIT

EAC

Innovation and Technology

175

167

167

39

99

97

97

34

Euratom Supply Agency (3) — EURATOM

ENER & RTD

Energy and Innovation

0,1

0,1

0,1

25

0,1

0,1

0,1

25

Europol Pension Fund — EPF

HOME

Administrative Expenditure of Europol

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

Total

1  934

2  257

2  208

6  578

2  026

1  830

1  794

6  536

2014

2013

Commission subsidy part in agencies’ income:

60,5 %

51,9 %

Agencies’ forecasted income budget in comparison with EU general budget:

1,4 %

1,4 %

Agencies’ staff establishment plan in comparison with total under the EU general budget:

14,1 %

14,0 %

---

(1)  According to 2014/2013 consolidated EU annual accounts.

(2)  Permanent and temporary EU officials (AD, AST and AST/SC) only, according to staff establishment plan.

(3)  Euratom Supply Agency is not consolidated in the EU annual accounts;

---

ANNEX II

Comments made by the Court in 2014, not calling its opinion into question

| | Total No of comments | Reliability of accounts | Legality/Regularity of Transactions | Internal controls | Budget Implementation | Other comments |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Weaknesses in procurement procedures | Weaknesses in grant controls | Carry overs without legal commitment | Delays in collecting fees | Weak controls over fixed assets/stock taking | Weak grant controls | Other | High carry-overs | High budget transfers | High cancellations of 2013 carry-overs | Insufficient commitments | Other | SFM | Miscalculation in staff salaries | High turnover of staff | Other |
| 1 | ACER — Ljubljana | 3 | | | | | | | | | X | | | | X | | | | X |
| 2 | BEREC — Riga | 3 | | | | | | | | | X | X | | | X | | | | |
| 3 | CdT — Luxembourg | 1 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | X | | | |
| 4 | CEDEFOP — Thessaloniki | 0 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| 5 | CEPOL — Budapest | 2 | | | | | | | | | X | | X | | | | | | |
| 6 | CHAFEA — Luxembourg | 1 | | | | | | | | | X | | | | | | | | |
| 7 | CPVO — Angers | 2 | | | | | | | | X | | | | | | | | | X |
| 8 | EACEA — Brussels | 1 | | | | | | | | | X | | | | | | | | |
| 9 | EASA — Koln | 2 | | | | | | | | | X | | | | | X | | | |
| 10 | EASME — Brussels | 3 | | | | | | | | | X | | X | X | | | | | |
| 11 | EASO — Valletta | 7 | | | | X | | | | X | X | | X | X | | X | | X | |
| 12 | EBA — London | 1 | | | | | | | | | X | | | | | | | | |
| 13 | ECDC — Stockholm | 1 | | | | | | | | | X | | | | | | | | |
| 14 | ECHA — Helsinki | 2 | | | | | | | | | X | | | | X | | | | |
| 15 | EEA — Kobenhavn | 3 | | X | | | | | X | | | | | | | | | | X |
| 16 | EFCA — Vigo | 0 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| 17 | EFSA — Parma | 1 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | X | | |
| 18 | EIGE — Vilnius | 1 | | | | | | | | | X | | | | | | | | |
| 19 | EIOPA — Frankfurt | 1 | | | | | | | | | X | | | | | | | | |
| 20 | EIT — Budapest | 4 | | | | | | | X | | | | | X | | | | X | X |
| 21 | EMA — London | 4 | | | | | X | X | | | | | | | | X | | | X |
| 22 | EMCDDA — Lisboa | 1 | | | | | | | | | X | | | | | | | | |
| 23 | EMSA — Lisboa | 0 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| 24 | ENISA — Heraklion | 1 | | | | | | | | | X | | | | | | | | |
| 25 | EPF — The Hague | 0 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| 26 | ERA — Valenciennes | 2 | | | | | | | | | X | | | | | X | | | |
| 27 | ERCEA — Brussels | 1 | | | | | | X | | | | | | | | | | | |
| 28 | ESMA — Paris | 4 | X | X | | | | | | | X | | X | | | | | | |
| 29 | ETF — Torino | 3 | | | | | | | | | X | | X | | | | X | | |
| 30 | eu-LISA — Tallinn | 2 | | | | | | | | | X | | X | | | | | | |
| 31 | EU-OSHA — Bilbao | 2 | | | | | | | | | X | | | | | | X | | |
| 32 | EURATOM — Luxembourg | 0 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| 33 | EUROFOUND — Dublin | 2 | | | | | | | | | X | | | | | | X | | |
| 34 | EUROJUST — The Hague | 2 | | | | | | | | | X | | | | X | | | | |
| 35 | EUROPOL — The Hague | 2 | | | | | | | | | X | | X | | | | | | |
| 36 | FRA — Wien | 2 | | | | | | | | | X | | | | | | X | | |
| 37 | FRONTEX — Warsaw | 4 | | | X | | | | | | X | | | | | | | | XX |
| 38 | GSA — Prague | 3 | | | | | | | | | X | | | | | XX | | | |
| 39 | INEA — Brussels | 1 | | | | | | | | | X | | | | | | | | |
| 40 | OHIM — Alicante | 4 | | | | | | | | X | X | | X | | | | X | | |
| 41 | REA — Brussels | 0 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Subtotals: | 79 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 28 | 1 | 8 | 3 | 4 | 7 | 6 | 2 | 7 |
| Totals: | 1 | 5 | 7 | 44 | 22 |
| | 1 % | 6 % | 9 % | 56 % | 28 % |

Total No of comments

Reliability of accounts

Legality/Regularity of Transactions

Internal controls

Budget Implementation

Other comments

Weaknesses in procurement procedures

Weaknesses in grant controls

Carry overs without legal commitment

Delays in collecting fees

Weak controls over fixed assets/stock taking

Weak grant controls

Other

High carry-overs

High budget transfers

High cancellations of 2013 carry-overs

Insufficient commitments

Other

SFM

Miscalculation in staff salaries

High turnover of staff

Other

1

ACER — Ljubljana

3

X

X

X

2

BEREC — Riga

3

X

X

X

3

CdT — Luxembourg

1

X

4

CEDEFOP — Thessaloniki

0

5

CEPOL — Budapest

2

X

X

6

CHAFEA — Luxembourg

1

X

7

CPVO — Angers

2

X

X

8

EACEA — Brussels

1

X

9

EASA — Koln

2

X

X

10

EASME — Brussels

3

X

X

X

11

EASO — Valletta

7

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

12

EBA — London

1

X

13

ECDC — Stockholm

1

X

14

ECHA — Helsinki

2

X

X

15

EEA — Kobenhavn

3

X

X

X

16

EFCA — Vigo

0

17

EFSA — Parma

1

X

18

EIGE — Vilnius

1

X

19

EIOPA — Frankfurt

1

X

20

EIT — Budapest

4

X

X

X

X

21

EMA — London

4

X

X

X

X

22

EMCDDA — Lisboa

1

X

23

EMSA — Lisboa

0

24

ENISA — Heraklion

1

X

25

EPF — The Hague

0

26

ERA — Valenciennes

2

X

X

27

ERCEA — Brussels

1

X

28

ESMA — Paris

4

X

X

X

X

29

ETF — Torino

3

X

X

X

30

eu-LISA — Tallinn

2

X

X

31

EU-OSHA — Bilbao

2

X

X

32

EURATOM — Luxembourg

0

33

EUROFOUND — Dublin

2

X

X

34

EUROJUST — The Hague

2

X

X

35

EUROPOL — The Hague

2

X

X

36

FRA — Wien

2

X

X

37

FRONTEX — Warsaw

4

X

X

XX

38

GSA — Prague

3

X

XX

39

INEA — Brussels

1

X

40

OHIM — Alicante

4

X

X

X

X

41

REA — Brussels

0

Subtotals:

79

1

2

1

1

1

2

2

3

28

1

8

3

4

7

6

2

7

Totals:

1

5

7

44

22

1 %

6 %

9 %

56 %

28 %

---

ANNEX III

Follow-up of open 2012 and 2013 comments not calling the Court’s opinions into question

| | Total | Completed | Ongoing | Outstanding | N/A |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Regulatory Agencies |
| 1 | European Medicines Agency — EMA | 1 | 1 | | | |
| 2 | Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market — OHIM | 4 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| 3 | European Aviation Safety Agency — EASA | 3 | | 2 | | 1 |
| 4 | European Agency for the Management of Operational Cooperation at the External Borders — FRONTEX | 11 | 3 | 4 | | 4 |
| 5 | European Police Office — EUROPOL | 3 | | 2 | | 1 |
| 6 | European Food Safety Authority — EFSA | 3 | 2 | 1 | | |
| 7 | European Maritime Safety Agency — EMSA | 3 | 1 | 2 | | |
| 8 | European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control — ECDC | 6 | 1 | 1 | | 4 |
| 9 | Translations Centre for the Bodies of the EU — CDT | 5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | |
| 10 | European Environment Agency — EEA | 2 | | 2 | | |
| 11 | European Body for the Enhancement of Judicial Cooperation — EUROJUST | 3 | 1 | 1 | | 1 |
| 12 | European Chemicals Agency — ECHA | 2 | | | | 2 |
| 13 | European Railway Agency — ERA | 6 | 2 | 4 | | |
| 14 | European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights — FRA | 2 | | | | 2 |
| 15 | European Banking Authority — EBA | 3 | | 1 | | 2 |
| 16 | European foundation for improvement of living & working conditions — EUROFOUND | 5 | 2 | 1 | | 2 |
| 17 | European Training Foundation — ETF | 1 | | 1 | | |
| 18 | European Securities and Markets Authority — ESMA | 10 | 4 | 5 | | 1 |
| 19 | European Centre for the Development of Vocational Training — CEDEFOP | 0 | | | | |
| 20 | European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority — EIOPA | 4 | 2 | | | 2 |
| 21 | European Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction — EMCDDA | 4 | 3 | | | 1 |
| 22 | European Agency for Safety and Health at Work — EU-OSHA | 2 | | | | 2 |
| 23 | Community Plant Variety Office – CPVO | 3 | 2 | | | 1 |
| 24 | European GNSS Agency — GSA | 2 | | | | 2 |
| 25 | European Fisheries Control Agency — EFCA | 2 | | | | 2 |
| 26 | European Institute for Gender equality — EIGE | 3 | 2 | | | 1 |
| 27 | European Police College — CEPOL | 8 | 4 | 3 | | 1 |
| 28 | European Network and Information Security Agency — ENISA | 5 | 1 | 1 | | 3 |
| 29 | European Agency for the Cooperation of Energy Regulators — ACER | 5 | 4 | | | 1 |
| 30 | European Asylum Support Office — EASO | 8 | | 3 | 2 | 3 |
| 31 | Office for the body of European Regulators for Electronic Communications — BEREC | 6 | 2 | 2 | | 2 |
| 32 | European Agency for the Operational Management of Large-Scale IT Systems in the Area of Freedom, Security and Justice — eu-LISA | 8 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 4 |
| Executive Agencies |
| 33 | Education, Audiovisual and Culture Executive Agency — EACEA | 1 | | | | 1 |
| 34 | Research Executive Agency — REA | 0 | | | | |
| 35 | European Research Council Executive Agency — ERCEA | 0 | | | | |
| 36 | Executive Agency for Small and Medium-sized Enterprises — EASME (previously EACI) | 1 | | | 1 | |
| 37 | Innovation and Networks Executive Agency — INEA (previously TEN-TEA) | 3 | 2 | | | 1 |
| 38 | Consumers, Health, Agriculture and Food Executive Agency — CHAFEA (previously EAHC) | 2 | | | | 2 |
| Other Bodies |
| 39 | European Institute of Innovation and Technology — EIT | 9 | 4 | 2 | | 3 |
| 40 | Euratom Supply Agency — EURATOM | 3 | 2 | | | 1 |
| 41 | Europol Pension Fund — EPF | 1 | | | | 1 |
| Totals | 153 | 51 | 41 | 6 | 55 |

Total

Completed

Ongoing

Outstanding

N/A

Regulatory Agencies

1

European Medicines Agency — EMA

1

1

2

Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market — OHIM

4

1

1

1

1

3

European Aviation Safety Agency — EASA

3

2

1

4

European Agency for the Management of Operational Cooperation at the External Borders — FRONTEX

11

3

4

4

5

European Police Office — EUROPOL

3

2

1

6

European Food Safety Authority — EFSA

3

2

1

7

European Maritime Safety Agency — EMSA

3

1

2

8

European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control — ECDC

6

1

1

4

9

Translations Centre for the Bodies of the EU — CDT

5

3

1

1

10

European Environment Agency — EEA

2

2

11

European Body for the Enhancement of Judicial Cooperation — EUROJUST

3

1

1

1

12

European Chemicals Agency — ECHA

2

2

13

European Railway Agency — ERA

6

2

4

14

European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights — FRA

2

2

15

European Banking Authority — EBA

3

1

2

16

European foundation for improvement of living & working conditions — EUROFOUND

5

2

1

2

17

European Training Foundation — ETF

1

1

18

European Securities and Markets Authority — ESMA

10

4

5

1

19

European Centre for the Development of Vocational Training — CEDEFOP

0

20

European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority — EIOPA

4

2

2

21

European Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction — EMCDDA

4

3

1

22

European Agency for Safety and Health at Work — EU-OSHA

2

2

23

Community Plant Variety Office – CPVO

3

2

1

24

European GNSS Agency — GSA

2

2

25

European Fisheries Control Agency — EFCA

2

2

26

European Institute for Gender equality — EIGE

3

2

1

27

European Police College — CEPOL

8

4

3

1

28

European Network and Information Security Agency — ENISA

5

1

1

3

29

European Agency for the Cooperation of Energy Regulators — ACER

5

4

1

30

European Asylum Support Office — EASO

8

3

2

3

31

Office for the body of European Regulators for Electronic Communications — BEREC

6

2

2

2

32

European Agency for the Operational Management of Large-Scale IT Systems in the Area of Freedom, Security and Justice — eu-LISA

8

2

1

1

4

Executive Agencies

33

Education, Audiovisual and Culture Executive Agency — EACEA

1

1

34

Research Executive Agency — REA

0

35

European Research Council Executive Agency — ERCEA

0

36

Executive Agency for Small and Medium-sized Enterprises — EASME (previously EACI)

1

1

37

Innovation and Networks Executive Agency — INEA (previously TEN-TEA)

3

2

1

38

Consumers, Health, Agriculture and Food Executive Agency — CHAFEA (previously EAHC)

2

2

Other Bodies

39

European Institute of Innovation and Technology — EIT

9

4

2

3

40

Euratom Supply Agency — EURATOM

3

2

1

41

Europol Pension Fund — EPF

1

1

Totals

153

51

41

6

55

---