T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pane l una ni m ous l yf i nds thi s c a s e s ui t abl e f

orde c i s i on w i thout ** o r a l ar g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). K A D / R es ear ch NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON

UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T BE RNARDI NO GA BR I EL - PE RE Z; VENA NCI A PER EZ DE GA BR I EL ; EDUA RDO G ABRI EL - PE RE Z, P et i t i o n ers, v. E R I C H . H O L D E R J r ., A tto rn e yG e n e r a l, R e s p o n d e n t. N o. 07- 71494 A ge nc yN os . A 076- 356- 260

A 076- 356- 337 A 072- 402- 852 ME MOR AN DU M *

O n P e t i t i on f

orR e vi e w of

a n O r de rof

the B o ar do f I m m ig r a tio n A p p e a ls S ubm i tt e d J anua ry11, 2010 ** B efo re: B E E Z E R , T R O T T , an dB Y B E E , C i rcu i tJu d g es. B e rn ar d in o G ab r ie l- P e r e z , h is w if e , V e n an c iaP e r e z d e G ab r ie l, an da du lt s on, E duar do G abr i e l - P e r e z , na t i ve s a nd c i t i z e ns of M e xi c o, pe t i t i on f

orr e vi e w of 

# FI LED JAN 20 2 010 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALSK AD / Res ea r ch 07- 71494 2 the B oard of Im m i grat i on A pp ea l s’ (“ B IA ”) order denyi ng thei r m ot i on t o reopen r e m o v a l p r o c e e d in g s . W e h a v e ju r is d ic tio n p u r s u an t to 8 U .S .C . § 1 2 5 2 . W e r e v ie w th e d e n ia l o f

am o tio n to r e o p e n f

o rab u s e o f

d is c r e tio n , O rdo n ezv . I NS , 3 4 5 F .3 d7 7 7 , 7 8 2 ( 9 th C ir . 2 0 0 3 ) , an dw e r e v ie w du e p r o c e s s c la im s d e n o v o , R am v . I NS , 2 4 3 F . 3 d5 1 0 , 5 1 6 ( 9 th C i r . 2 0 0 1 ) . We d e n yth e p e t i t i o n f o rr e v i e w. T h e B I A d idn o t ab u s e its d is c r e tio n in d e n y in g p e titio n e r s ’ m o tio n to r e o p e n b e c au s e th e m o tio n w a s u n tim e ly , se e 8 C .F .R . § 1 0 0 3 .2 ( c ) ; A lal i -A m i n v. Mukasey , 5 2 3 F . 3 d1 0 3 9 , 1 0 4 1 -4 2 (9 th C i r. 2 0 0 8 ), p et i t i o n ers fai l edt o est ab l i sh c h an g e dc ir c u m s tan c e s in M e x ic o th a t w o u ldw arr an t r e o p e n in g , se e 8 C .F .R .§ 1 0 0 3 .2 ( c ) ( 3 ) ( ii) ; A z a n o rv . A s h c r o ft , 36 4 F . 3d 10 13 , 10 21 -22 (9th C i r. 2 0 0 4 ) , an dp e titio n e r s f a ile dto e s tab lis h p r im af a c ie e lig ib ilityf

o rr e lie f , se e O rdon ez , 3 4 5 F .3 da t 7 8 5 . I t f o llo w s th a t th e d e n ia l o f p e titio n e r s ’ m o tio n to r e o p e n d idn o t v io la te du e p r o c e s s . Se e La ta v . I NS , 20 4 F . 3d 12 41 , 12 46 (9th C i r. 2 0 0 0 ) ( r e q u ir in g e rr o rto p r e v a il o n adu e p r o c e s s c la im ) . P e t i t i one r s a l s o c ont e nd tha tthe B I A e rr e d byf a i l i ng t o c ons i de rE dua r do G ab r ie l- P e r e z ’ r e q u e s t to s ub m it as e p ar a te a s y lu m ap p lic a tio n . T h is c o n te n tio n is w i tho utm er i tbecause pet i t i on er s di d n otov er com e the pres um pt i on thatthe B IA f u llyr e v ie w e dth e r e c o r d . See Ferna ndezv. G on zales , 43 9 F . 3d 59 2, 60 3 (9th C i r. 2 0 0 6 ) .K AD / Res ea r ch 07- 71494 3 F i na l l y , the r e i s no m e r i tt o pe t i t i one r s ’ c ont e nt i on tha tthe B I A e rr e d by e m pl oy i ng a n i nc orr e c tl e ga l s t andar d. P E T I T I ON F OR RE V I E W DE NI E D.