alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2013094EN.01000101.xml

| 3.4.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 94/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.4.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 94/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.6701 — Ferrovial/Enterprise)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2013/C 94/01

On 25 March 2013, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32013M6701. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32013M6701. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.

---
U.S. flag
              An official website of the United States government Skip to main content   end of header Census.gov Newsroom Releases 2010 Census
 Newsroom Archive
 Skip left menu navigation
 About the Newsroom
 				Facts for Features
 				**News Releases**
 				Press Kits
 				Tip Sheets
 Release Information CB10-CR.54 **Contact:**  Jennifer Smits
Public Information Office
(301) 763-3030 (phone)
(301) 763-3762 (fax)
(301) 457-1037 (TDD)PIO@census.gov
 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:  WEDNESDAY, MARCH 31, 2010 Media Advisory — 2010 Census Road Tour Comes to NCAA Finals in Indianapolis Traveling for a total of 1,547 days and more than 150,000 miles across the country, 13 road tour vehicles will provide the public with an educational, engaging and interactive experience that brings the 2010 Census to life. At each event across the country, attendees will have the opportunity to learn about the 2010 Census and understand the benefits a complete count can bring to communities everywhere; view a sample 2010 Census form and learn how the collected information is used; and contribute stories and photos to the Portrait of America project to explain why “I count!” and view messages from other road tour participants.
    
    
 For more information about the 2010 Census and the Road Tour, please visit 2010census.gov and follow us on Twitter (@2010Portrait), Facebook, MySpace, Flickr and YouTube (/uscensusbureau).
  CONNECT WITH US

Information Quality
                    Data Linkage Infrastructure
                    Data Protection and Privacy Policy
                    Accessibility      
                    FOIA
                    Inspector General
                    No FEAR Act
                    U.S. Department of Commerce
                    USA.gov
                   Measuring America's People, Places, and Economy
Exhibit 10.1


 


This A D D E N D U M is made this 19th  day of August 2016.







BETWEEN :-







	
(1)

	
NEW ASIA HOLDINGS INC , a corporation registered in the United States of America and listed on US OTCQB market, Symbol NAHD, and having its registered office at 60 Paya Lebar Road #12-08 Paya Lebar Square Singapore 409051 (the " Purchaser ") .





re







	
(2)

	
ANTHONY NG ZI QIN (Singapore NRIC No. ) of 102 Gerald Drive, #04-75 Seletar Springs Condominium, Singapore 798593 (the " Vendor ").





.







THIS ADDENDUM is supplemental to the written Sale and Purchase Agreement dated 25 th August 2015 entered into between the Purchaser and the Vendor (" Agreement ").












THE PARTIES HEREBY AGREE AS FOLLOWS :-







1. Variation







	
1.1

	
By mutual agreement, the Parties hereby extend the stipulated timeline under Clause 3.3 of the Agreement by one (1) year to the second anniversary date of the Agreement.










	
1.2

	
As such, all references to the 'first anniversary date of this Agreement' at Clause 3.3 of the Agreement shall be varied and changed to 'second anniversary date of this Agreement'.










2.   Incorporation







	
2.1

	
This Addendum shall be construed as one with the Agreement. Accordingly, the term "Agreement" and other relevant terms as used in the Agreement and all other instruments and agreements executed thereunder or pursuant thereto shall for all purposes refer to the Agreement as amended, varied and supplemented by this Addendum.










	
2.2

	
Except to the extent each is expressly amended by the terms of this Addendum, the Agreement and all other instruments and agreements executed thereunder or pursuant thereto shall remain in full force and effect.










 





















3. Governing Law







   This Addendum shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of Singapore.












I N   W I T N E S S   W H E R E O F    this Addendum has been entered into by the parties hereto and shall be effective on the day and year first above written.







THE PURCHASER:







Signed by


 


Lin Kok Peng                                                                                           /s/ Lin Kok Peng


for and on behalf of                                                                              


 


NEW ASIA HOLDINGS INC                                                             







in the presence of:







/s/ Jose A Capote







Name:


NRIC / Passport No:






















THE VENDOR:







Signed by


 


ANTHONY NG ZI QIN                                                                          /s/ Anthony Ng Zi Qin







 


in the presence of:


 







/s/ Jose A Capote







Name:


NRIC / Passport No:
<PAGE>


                                                                   Exhibit 23.11

                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements on Forms S-8 (Nos. 333-38521, 333-38523, 333-38525, 333-38527,
333-38531, 333-38533, 333-38537, 333-38539, 333-48167, 333-61395, 333-65688 and
333-65704), Forms S-4 (No's. 333-61401 and 333-47926) and Form S-3
(No. 333-64979) of Security Capital Group Incorporated of our report dated 21
March 2002 relating to the combined financial statements of Access Self-Storage
Holdings S.A., Akeler Holdings S.A., B.C. Holdings S.A., and CWE Property
Holdings S.A., which is included in the Security Capital Group Incorporated
Annual Report on Form 10-K.


PricewaterhouseCoopers
London
28 March 2002
#### Zayneller GATES, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. S-282.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

July 3, 1973.

Zayneller Gates, pro. per.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., and Carolyn M. Snurkowski, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant seeks reversal of the trial court’s order denying his motion to vacate a judgment revoking his probation and sentencing him to fifteen years imprisonment.

We have reviewed the record on appeal and the briefs filed herein and our consideration thereof requires a conclusion that no error was committed below. Accordingly, the order appealed herein is affirmed.

SPECTOR, C. J., and WIGGINTON and JOHNSON, JJ., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          FEB-01-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             FEB-04-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               FEB-01-1997
<CASH>                                         388,267
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,369,462
<ALLOWANCES>                                   587,150
<INVENTORY>                                 25,314,919
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            28,368,988
<PP&E>                                      46,864,216
<DEPRECIATION>                              32,597,009
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              42,849,099
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       27,524,299
<BONDS>                                      9,258,949
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       294,600
<OTHER-SE>                                   5,590,923
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                42,849,099
<SALES>                                    197,023,821
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           197,023,821
<CGS>                                      129,000,923
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              129,000,923
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            69,967,273
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               926,713
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           3,609,314
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (5,552,595)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (5,552,595)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                              2,123,096
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (3,429,499)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.12)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.12)
        

</TABLE>
V

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 3444

To authorize the Secretary of Transportation to issue a certificate of documentation with appropriate endorsement for employment in the coastwise

trade of the United States for the vessel KLIPPER.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

NOVEMBER 3, 1993

Mr. LAZIO introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee

on Merchant Marine and Fisheries

A BILL

To authorize the Secretary of Transportation to issue a

certificate of documentation with appropriate endorsement for employment in the coastwise trade of the

United States for the vessel KLIPPER.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That notwithstanding section 27 of the Merchant Marine

4 Act, 1920 (46 App. U.S.C. 883), the Act of June 19, 1886

5 (46 App. U.S.C. 289), and section 12106 of title 46,

6 United States Code, the Secretary of Transportation may

7 issue a certificate of documentation with appropriate en8 dorsement for employment in the coastwise trade of the
2

•HR 3444 IH

1 United States for the vessel KLIPPER (New York State

2 registration number NY8166AN).

Æ
#### Mrs. Syd DAVIS and Mrs. Ester Ann Shiffman, Appellants, v. PHOENIX INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellee.

No. 46610.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

April 3, 1972.

Rehearing Denied May 8, 1972.

Sekul, Hornsby, Wallace & Blessey, Bil-oxi, for appellants.

Bryant & Stennis, Gulfport, Watkins & Eager, Joe W. Hobbs, Jackson, for appel-lee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
#### Lewis AIKENS, Appellant, v. Patricia B. ROBISON and Harriet B. Woodson, Administratrices of the Estate of Maybel Pelhank Brown, deceased, Appellees.

No. 7275.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Second District.

March 31, 1967.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
#### In re TRANSITION RULE 17. Excusing Prospective State-Wide Grand Jurors.

No. 42980.

Supreme Court of Florida.

March 28, 1974.

PER CURIAM.

Chapter 73-123, Fla.Stat., Ch. 906, F.S.A., authorizes the presiding judge to excuse prospective state-wide grand jurors upon a showing that service on the state-wide grand jury will result in an unreasonable personal or financial hardship by virtue of the location or projected length of the grand jury investigation.

A state-wide grand jury is presently being impaneled and the method of granting excuses to a prospective state grand juror has become an emergency matter. In order to facilitate the excusing of prospective jurors, the appended rule, as Transition Rule 17, is hereby adopted.

This rule shall take effect upon being filed in the office of the Clerk of the Supreme Court of Florida.

It is so ordered.

ADKINS, C. J., and ROBERTS, ERVIN, BOYD, McCAIN and DEKLE, JJ., concur.

TRANSITION RULE 17. EXCUSING PROSPECTIVE STATE-WIDE GRAND JURORS.

The presiding judge may issue an order appointing the chief judge of the judicial circuit in which a propective grand juror resides to make the determination as to whether or not service on the state-wide grand jury will result in an unreasonable personal or financial hardship by virtue of the location or projected length of the grand jury investigation.

In addition, the chief judges are to .determine whether or not a prospective grand juror fails to meet, as of December 8, 1973, the qualifications of Chapter 90S and Chapter 906 of Florida Statutes or fails to meet the qualifications as a juror in the county in which he or *she*resides. This determination shall be made only for those prospective grand jurors who contact the chief judge and claim disqualification.

The chief judges shall excuse any prospective grand juror who requests and is qualified for exemption from grand jury -service under Chapters 90S or 906, of Florida Statutes, or from service as a juror in the county in which he resides.

The chief judge shall inform the presiding judge without delay as to any such determination.
Exhibit 32.1

Certification Pursuant To 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 By The Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer,

As Adopted Pursuant To Section 906 Of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act Of 2002.

I, F. Clay
Creasey, Jr., certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:



| | 1. | The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Toys R Us Property Company II, LLC (the Company) for the quarterly period ended October 30, 2010 (the
Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) and 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (15 U.S.C. 78m); and
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: December 14, 2010



|                                                                                                                        
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/    F. Clay Creasey, Jr.                                                                                             
|F. Clay Creasey, Jr. President and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer)
<PAGE>

                                                                   Exhibit 99.1

                                March 27, 2002

United States Securities and Exchange Commission
450 Fifth Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20549-0405

   Re: 2001 Annual Report on Form 10-K of Security Capital Group Incorporated

Ladies and Gentlemen:

   In connection with the 2001 Annual Report on Form 10-K of Security Capital
Group Incorporated, Arthur Andersen has consented to the incorporation of their
audit report for Security Capital Group Incorporated.

   Arthur Andersen has represented to Security Capital Group Incorporated that
their audits were subject to their quality control system for the U.S.
accounting and auditing practice to provide reasonable assurance that the
engagement was conducted in compliance with professional standards, that there
was appropriate continuity of Arthur Andersen personnel working on the audit,
availability of national office consultation, and availability of personnel at
foreign affiliates of Arthur Andersen to conduct the relevant portions of the
audit.

   If you have any questions or comments relating to this issue, please contact
me at 505-820-8201.

                                          Sincerely,

                                          SECURITY CAPITAL GROUP INCORPORATED

                                          Jeffrey A. Klopf
                                          Senior Vice President and Secretary
1 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF IDAHO

Docket No. 45760

STATE OF IDAHO ,

Plaintiff

- Respondent ,

v.

PATRICK DEE HOWARD ,

Defendant

- Appellant

. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Filed: August 2, 2018

Karel A. Lehrman, Clerk

THIS IS AN UNPUBLISHED OPINION AND SHALL NOT BE CITED AS AUTHORITY

Appeal from the District Court of the Fourth Judicial District, State of Idaho, Ada County. Hon. Richard D. Greenwood , District Judge.

Order denying Idaho Criminal Rule 35 motion, affirmed

.
Eric D. Fredericksen, State Appellate Public Defender; Maya P. Waldron , Deputy Appellate Public Defender, Boise, for appellant.

Hon. Lawrence G. Wasden, Attorney General; Lor i A. Fleming , Deputy Attorney General, Boise, for respondent.

________________________________________________ Before GRATTON, Chief Judge; HUSKEY, Judge; and LORELLO, Judge

________________________________________________

PER CURIAM

Patrick Dee Howard pleaded guilty to grand theft o f a rented or leased automobile , Idaho

Code § § 18

- 2403(5)(b),

- 2407,

- 2409 . The district court imposed a unified ten

- year sentence, with two years determinate

. Howard filed an I.C.R. 35 motion, which the district court denied.

Howard appeals.
A motion for reduction of sentence under I.C.R. 35 is essentially a plea for leniency,

addressed to the sound discretion of the court. State v. Knighton , 143 Idaho 318, 319, 1 44 P.3d
23, 24 (2006); State v. Allbee , 115 Idaho 845, 846, 771 P.2d 66, 67 (Ct. App. 1989). In
presenting an I.C.R. 35 motion, the defendant must show that the sentence is excessive in light of
new or additional information subsequently provided to the d istrict court in support of the2 motion. State v. Huffman , 144 Idaho 201, 203, 159 P.3d 838, 840 (2007). Upon review of the
record, including any new information submitted with Howard ’s I.C.R. 35 motion, we conclude

no abuse of discretion has been shown . Therefore, the district court’s order denying Howard ’s

I.C.R. 35 motion is affirmed.
#### William H. Moore, Trustee, Respondent, *vs.*Samuel C. Davis, Appellant.

1. Practice, *civil*— Evidence, *weight*ofJ *etc.*— In civil law cases where there is a conflict of evidence, the verdict of the jury will not be disturbed by the Supreme Court.

*Appeal from Franklin Circuit Court.*

*Lowe*& Jeffries, for Appellant.

*Halligan &*Flanagan, for Respondent.

Wagner, Judge,

delivered the opinion of the court.

The respondent as trustee of Elizabeth M. Moore, a married woman, brought his action in the Franklin County Circuit Court, to recover damages against the defendant for wrongfully and unlawfully taking and carrying away certain personal property, being .the products of a farm held in trust for the said Elizabeth. The defence was, that the property was seized and sold by the sheriff, by virtue of an execution in favor of the defendant Davis, against tjie husband of Elizabeth. It was also averred that the farm was fraudulently conveyed to the trustee, for the benefit and use of the said Elizabeth, for the purpose of cheating and defrauding the creditors of the husband.

The trial was submitted to the court without the intervention of a jury, and there was a verdict and judgment for the plaintiff.

No complaint is made in this court that there was any error *234committed, below in reference to declarations of law. But it is expressly conceded by the appellants in their argument, that all the law necessary to be applied to the facts as developed in the cause were contained in the instructions given at their request.

It is now urged, however, that the finding of the court sitting as a jury, is against the weight of evidence. But this is not a chancery suit where the court reviews the facts; it is a proceeding at law, where we do not examine the evidence to judge of its weight. Where there is conflicting testimony we will not disturb the verdict of a jury, or the finding of a court sitting to try the facts.

The only question presented here is simply one regarding the weight or preponderance of testimony, and as there was evidence submitted to support the finding, we cannot interfere with the judgment.

Affirmed,

all the judges concurring.
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Larry Joe PHILLIPS.

No. 61864.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 7, 1978.

In re: Larry Joe Phillips applying for remedial writs. Parish of Orleans.

Writ denied. An appeal is pending.
EXHIBIT 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with Amendment No.1 to the Quarterly Report of Plandel Resources, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended August 31, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Mario Santos Gregorio, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:





(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








/s/ Mario Santos GregorioMario Santos GregorioPresident and Chief Executive Officer



October 3, 2012
#### Edward *John*BRICKING, Jr., Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 42425.

Supreme Court of Florida.

April 13, 1973.

Appeal dismissed.
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS





We consent to the incorporation by reference in the
registration statement of Cooperative Bankshares, Inc.
on Form S-8 (File No. 333-22335) of our report dated
January 21, 2000, on our audits of the consolidated
financial statements of Cooperative Bankshares, Inc.
as of December 31, 1999 and 1998, and for each of the
three years in the period ended December 31, 1999,
which report is incorporated by reference in this
Annual Report on Form 10-K.



/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

Raleigh, North Carolina
March 27, 2000
EXHIBIT 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of EDUtoons, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q, for the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Eileen Russell, Chief Executive Officer and President of EDUtoons, Inc., certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:





(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date: October 20, 2011
By:
/s/ Eileen RussellEileen RussellChief Executive Officer and President

(Principal Executive Officer)
Electronically FiledIntermediate Court of AppealsCAAP-12-000038930-MAY-201309:24 AM