alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2016346EN.01015001.xml

| 21.9.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 346/150 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.9.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 346/150

---

P8_TA(2015)0116

Application of Articles 107 and 108 TFEU to certain categories of horizontal state aid *

European Parliament legislative resolution of 29 April 2015 on the proposal for a Council regulation on the application of Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union to certain categories of horizontal state aid (codified text) (COM(2014)0377 — C8-0139/2014 — 2014/0192(NLE))

(Consultation — codification)

(2016/C 346/36)

The European Parliament,

The European Parliament

| — | having regard to the Commission proposal to the Council (COM(2014)0377), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the Commission proposal to the Council (COM(2014)0377),

| — | having regard to Article 109 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament (C8-0139/2014), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to Article 109 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament (C8-0139/2014),

| — | having regard to the Interinstitutional Agreement of 20 December 1994 — Accelerated working method for official codification of legislative texts (1), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the Interinstitutional Agreement of 20 December 1994 — Accelerated working method for official codification of legislative texts (1),

1

| — | having regard to Rules 103 and 59 of its Rules of Procedure, |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to Rules 103 and 59 of its Rules of Procedure,

| — | having regard to the report of the Committee on Legal Affairs (A8-0029/2014), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the report of the Committee on Legal Affairs (A8-0029/2014),

| A. | whereas, according to the Consultative Working Party of the legal services of the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission, the proposal in question contains a straightforward codification of the existing texts without any change in their substance, |
| --- | --- |

A.

whereas, according to the Consultative Working Party of the legal services of the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission, the proposal in question contains a straightforward codification of the existing texts without any change in their substance,

| 1. | Approves the Commission proposal as adapted to the recommendations of the Consultative Working Party of the legal services of the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Approves the Commission proposal as adapted to the recommendations of the Consultative Working Party of the legal services of the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission;

| 2. | Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council and the Commission. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council and the Commission.

---

(1)  OJ C 102, 4.4.1996, p. 2.

1

---
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 3454

To amend the provisions of title 39, United States Code, to provide that

certain periodical publications shall not be bound publications for mail

classification purposes, and for other purposes.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

NOVEMBER 4, 1993

Mr. PORTER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Post Office and Civil Service

A BILL

To amend the provisions of title 39, United States Code,

to provide that certain periodical publications shall not

be bound publications for mail classification purposes,

and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. CERTAIN PERIODICAL PUBLICATIONS EX4 CLUDED FROM CLASSIFICATION AS BOUND

5 PUBLICATIONS.

6 Section 3626 of title 39, United States Code, is

7 amended—
2

•HR 3454 IH

1 (1) by redesignating the second subsection (k)

2 as subsection (l); and

3 (2) by adding at the end the following:

4 ‘‘(m) In the administration of this section, a weekly

5 periodical publication which is eligible to publish legal no6 tices under the laws of any State, the pages of which were

7 customarily secured by 2 staples before March 19, 1989,

8 shall not be considered to be a bound publication for mail

9 classification purposes solely because its pages continue to

10 be secured by 2 staples after that date.’’.

Æ
# C_2015010EN.01000401.xml

| 14.1.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 10/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.1.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 10/4

---

Corrigendum to Clean Sky Joint Undertaking — Publication of the final accounts for the financial year 2013

(
  Official Journal of the European Union C 408 of 15 November 2014
  )

Official Journal of the European Union C 408 of 15 November 2014

(2015/C 10/04)

On page 4:

for:

for

‘http://www.acer.europa.eu/The_agency/Organisation/Administrative_Board/Pages/Opinions.aspx’,

read:

read

‘http://www.cleansky.eu/content/homepage/reference-documents’.

---
# C_2015077EN.01000901.xml

| 5.3.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 77/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.3.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 77/9

---

Notice of the impending expiry of certain anti-dumping measures

(2015/C 77/08)

1.   As provided for in Article 11(2) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009 of 30 November 2009 on protection against dumped imports from countries not members of the European Community (1), the Commission gives notice that, unless a review is initiated in accordance with the following procedure, the anti-dumping measures mentioned below will expire on the date mentioned in the table below.

1

2.   Procedure

Procedure

Union producers may lodge a written request for a review. This request must contain sufficient evidence that the expiry of the measures would be likely to result in a continuation or recurrence of dumping and injury.

Should the Commission decide to review the measures concerned, importers, exporters, representatives of the exporting country and Union producers will then be provided with the opportunity to amplify, rebut or comment on the matters set out in the review request.

3.   Time limit

Time limit

Union producers may submit a written request for a review on the above basis, to reach the European Commission, Directorate-General for Trade (Unit H-1), CHAR 4/39, 1000 Brussels, Belgium (2) at any time from the date of the publication of the present notice but no later than three months before the date mentioned in the table below.

2

4.   This notice is published in accordance with Article 11(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009.

| Product | Country(ies) of origin or exportation | Measures | Reference | Date of expiry (3) |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| High tenacity yarn of polyesters | The People’s Republic of China | Anti-dumping duty | Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1105/2010 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of high tenacity yarn of polyester originating in the People’s Republic of China (OJ L 315, 1.12.2010, p. 1). | 2.12.2015 |

Product

Country(ies) of origin or exportation

Measures

Reference

Date of expiry (3)

3

High tenacity yarn of polyesters

The People’s Republic of China

Anti-dumping duty

Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1105/2010 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of high tenacity yarn of polyester originating in the People’s Republic of China (OJ L 315, 1.12.2010, p. 1).

2.12.2015

---

(1)  OJ L 343, 22.12.2009, p. 51.

1

(2)  Fax +32 22956505.

2

(3)  The measure expires at midnight of the day mentioned in this column.

3

---
#### SODIKOFF v. ALLEN PARKER CO.

No. 36779.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Feb. 1968.

Certiorari denied without opinion. 202 So.2d 4.
`[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3676 Engrossed in House (EH)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 3676

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT


 
To amend the District of Columbia Spouse Equity Act of 1988 to provide 
    for coverage of the former spouses of judges of the District of 
                            Columbia courts.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. COVERAGE OF FORMER SPOUSES OF JUDGES OF DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA 
              COURTS UNDER SPOUSE EQUITY ACT.

    (a) In General.--Section 2 of the District of Columbia Spouse 
Equity Act of 1988 (sec. 1-3001, D.C. Code) is amended by striking 
``(A) and (C)''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) shall 
take effect as if included in the enactment of the District of Columbia 
Spouse Equity Act of 1988.

            Passed the House of Representatives May 25, 1994.

            Attest:






                                                                 Clerk.
                                     







103d CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 3676

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

To amend the District of Columbia Spouse Equity Act of 1988 to provide 
    for coverage of the former spouses of judges of the District of 
                            Columbia courts.`
#### James F. Edwards, Administrator of Thomas B. English, Respondent, *vs.*Andrew Giboney, Appellant.

*Practice, civil*— Allegata *and probata,*— A defendant will not be permitted to set up evidence to support a defence, not set up in his answer.

*Jlppeal from Oape Girardeau Court of Common Pleas.*

*L. Houck,*for Appellant.

*L. H. Davis,*for Respondent.

Adams, Judge

delivered the opinion of the court.

*130This was an action for legal services, claimed to have been rendered by the plaintiff’s intestate to the defendant, in many cases, to the amount of $450. The bill of particulars sets out fees for services, commencing in 1860 and 1861; in 1864 and 1865.

The defendant denied the employment of English in any of the cases, except the suit of Verges *vs.*Giboney and pleads payment for those services. The case of Verges *vs.*Giboney occurred in 1865, as set down in the bill of particulars.

On the trial the plaintiff introduced evidence tending to show, that English had rendered services in the suits set down in the bill of particulars, as occurring in 1861, 1864 and 1865; including the Yerges case in 1865, amounting in the aggregate to $250, and judgment was rendered for that amount against the defendant.

On trial the defendant offered to read the following receipt as evidence, which was excluded by the court. “$20, — deceived of Andrew Giboney twenty dollars, part of fees for attention to business for him, as attorney in sundry cases. December 9th, 1863. — Thomas E. English.

The exclusion of this receipt is the only material point presented for our consideration. There was no plea of payment for any of the services claimed, except the case of Yerges Avhieh occurred in-1865, long after this receipt was given. The receipt did not apply to the Yerges case, as the payment had reference to services already rendered, and not to services to be rendered in future cases. On this ground it was properly excluded.

Judgment affirmed.

The other judges concur.
Exhibit 4.1


 


		
        INCORPORATED UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE
        OF DELAWARE

        NANO VIBRONIX, INC.

         
	


 


	SHARES OF COMMON STOCK	PREFERRED STOCK
	PAR VALUE $        EACH	PAR VALUE $            EACH


 


THE CORPORATION WILL FURNISH WITHOUT CHARGE
TO ANY SHAREHOLDER WHO SO REQUESTS THE POWERS, DESIGNATIONS,


PREFERENCES AND RELATIVE, PARTICIPATING,
OPTIONAL OR OTHER SPECIAL RIGHTS OF EACH CLASS OF STOCK OR SERIES


THEREOF AND THE QUALIFICATIONS, LIMITATIONS
OR RESTRICTIONS OF SUCH PREFERENCES AND/OR RIGHTS


 


	This is to Certify that	 	is the owner of
	 


 


FULLY PAID AND NON-ASSESSABLE SHARES OF
THE COMMON STOCK OF


 


NANO VIBRONIX, INC.


 


transferable on the books of the Corporation
by the holder hereof in person or by duly


 


authorized Attorney, upon surrender of this
Certificate, properly endorsed.


 


Witness, the seal of the Corporation and
the signatures of its duly authorized officers.


 


Dated: 





 


	 	 	 
	SECRETARY	THIS CERTIFICATE IS SUBJECT TO THE RESTRICTIONS

SET FORTH ON THE BACK HEREOF.	CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER


 


 




    	 



    	 



    

 


NOTICE: THE SIGNATURE TO THIS ASSIGNMENT
MUST CORRESPOND WITH


THE NAME AS WRITTEN UPON THE FACE OF THE
CERTIFICATE IN EVERY PARTICULAR


  


The following abbreviations, when used in the inscription on
the face of this certificate, shall be construed as though they were written out in full according to applicable laws or regulations:


 


	TEN COM	-as tenants in common	UNIF GIFT MIN ACT -	.....Custodian .........
	 	 	 	(Cust)                 (Minor)
	TEN ENT	-as tenants by the entireties	 	Under Uniform Gifts to Minors 
	JT TEN	- as joint tenants with right of 

  survivorship and not as tenants in common	 	Act .............................             

                  (State)


 


Additional abbreviations may also be used
though not in the above list.


 


For value received _____ hereby sell,
assign and transfer unto


PLEASE INSERT SOCIAL SECURITY OR OTHER


IDENTIFYING NUMBER OF ASSIGNEE


	
         

         
	 	 


 


 


(PLEASE
PRINT OR TYPEWRITE NAME AND ADDRESS INCLUDING POSTAL ZIP CODE OF ASSIGNEE)


 


 





 



 


 


 






 


___________________________________________________________________________Shares


 


represented by the within Certificate,
and do hereby irrevocably constitute and appoint


 


____________________________________________
Attorney


 


to transfer the said Shares on the
books of the within named Corporation with full power of substitition in the premises.


 


Dated _________________ 20__


 


In presence of
# C_2015117EN.01000901.xml

| 11.4.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 117/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.4.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 117/9

---

Corrigendum to Information Notice — Public Consultation — Geographical indications from the Republic of Moldova

(
  Official Journal of the European Union C 68 of 26 February 2015
  )

Official Journal of the European Union C 68 of 26 February 2015

(2015/C 117/08)

On page 9, in the table ‘List of GIs for wines and agricultural products and foodstuffs’, second column, fourth row:

for:

for:

‘Vadul lui Traian’,

read:

read:

‘Valul lui Traian’.

Statements of opposition on ‘Valul lui Traian’ must reach the Commission within 2 months of the date of this publication.

---
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3285 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3285

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

             November 9 (legislative day, November 2), 1993

  Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Governmental 
                                Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To redesignate the postal facility located at 1401 West Fort Street, 
       Detroit, Michigan, as the ``George W. Young Post Office''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REDESIGNATION.

    The postal facility located at 1401 West Fort Street, in Detroit, 
Michigan, shall be known and designated as the ``George W. Young Post 
Office''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the postal facility referred to in 
section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``George W. Young 
Post Office''.

            Passed the House of Representatives November 8, 1993.

            Attest:

                                           DONNALD K. ANDERSON,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 

REGION IX 

75 Hawthorne Street 

San Francisco, CA 94105-3901 

Michael H. Scheible 

Deputy Executive Officer 

California Air Re.sources Board 

Post Office Box 281 5 

Sacramento, CA 958 12 

On April 29, 2009, CARB submitted revisions to the California State Implementation 

Plan (SIP). We have reviewed materials submitted with the following rules and found that they 

fulfill the completeness criteria in 40 CFR Part 51, Appendix V. 

This addresses all revisions in this submittal except for San Diego. In the coming months 

we will review the complete revisions for action pursuant to Clean Air Act section 11 O(k). 

APCDIAQMD 

Sacramento Metro 

San Joaquin Valley 

South Coast 

South Coast 

Questions regarding our completeness review should be directed to Cynthia G. Allen at 

(4 15) 947-4 120. 

Sincerely, 

Rule # 

450 

4902 

1156 

1168 

Deborah ~ordah 

Rule Title 

Graphic Arts Operations 

Residential Water Heaters 

Further Reductions of Particulate Emissions from 

Cement Manufacturing Facilities 

Adhesive and Sealant Applications 

Director, Air Division 

Printed on Recycled Paper 
Cc: Mr. Larry Greene, APCO 

Sacramento Metropolitan AQMD 

Mr. Seyed Sadredin, APCO 

San Joaquin Valley Unified APCD 

Dr. Barry Wallerstein 

Executive Officer 

South Coast AQNID 

Mr. Jorge L. Fernandez, Chief 

Program Evaluation Branch, CARB
Exhibit 32.2

Section 906 CFO Certification

WRITTEN STATEMENT OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE
OFFICER

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE

SARBANES - OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, the Chief Financial Officer and Chief Operating
Officer of FundCore Institutional Income Trust Inc. (the Company), hereby certifies that to his knowledge, on the date hereof:



| | (a) | the Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2010 filed on the date hereof with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section l3(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (b) | information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                       |  |  |  |                                                           
|---------------------- |  |  |  | ----------------------------------------------------------
|Date: December 6, 2010 |  |  |  | /s/ Lee J. Taragin                                        
|                       |  |  |  | Lee J. Taragin                                            
|                       |  |  |  | Chief Financial Officer and Chief Operating Officer       
|                       |  |  |  | (Principal Financial Officer and Chief Accounting Officer)
Consent of Independent Auditors

We consent to the  incorporation  by reference in this Annual Report (Form 10-K)
of Amcast  Industrial  Corporation and subsidiaries  (the Company) of our report
dated October 19, 2000,  included in the 2000 Annual Report to  Shareholders  of
Amcast Industrial Corporation.

Our audits also included the financial  statement  schedule of Amcast Industrial
Corporation  listed in item 14(a).  This schedule is the  responsibility  of the
Company's  management.  Our responsibility is to express an opinion based on our
audits. In our opinion, the financial statement schedule referred to above, when
considered  in  relation  to the basic  financial  statements  taken as a whole,
presents fairly, in all material respects, the information set forth therein.

We also consent to the  incorporation by reference in  Post-Effective  Amendment
No. 1 to  Registration  Statement  Number 33-2876 on Form S-8 dated November 27,
1987, in Registration  Statement  Number 33-18690 on Form S-8 dated December 21,
1987,  in  Registration  Statement  Number  33-28080 on Form S-8 dated April 11,
1989,  in  Registration  Statement  Number  33-28084 on Form S-8 dated April 11,
1989, in Registration  Statement  Number 33-38176 on Form S-8 dated December 20,
1990,  in  Registration  Statement  Number  33-28075 on Form S-3 dated April 11,
1989, in Registration  Statement  Number  33-61290 on Form S-8 dated April,  19,
1993, in Registration  Statement  Number 333-00133 on Form S-8 dated January 10,
1996, and in Registration  Statement  Number 333-89729 on Form S-8 dated October
26, 1999, of our report dated October 19, 2000, with respect to the consolidated
financial  statements  incorporated  by  reference  in this Annual  Report (Form
10-K),  and our report  included in the preceding  paragraph with respect to the
financial  statement  schedule  included  in this Annual  Report  (Form 10-K) of
Amcast Industrial Corporation and subsidiaries.



ERNST & YOUNG LLP
November 13, 2000
Dayton, Ohio
FILED

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

 APRIL 29, 2011

JOHN LEY

CLERK

[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________

No. 10-12375

________________________

D.C. Docket Nos. 1:09-md-02036-JLK,

1:10-cv-20478-JLK

In Re: CHECKING ACCOUNT OVERDRAFT LITIGATION

___________________________________________________

MAXINE AARONS GIVEN, Individually and

on behalf of all other similarly situated,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

M & T BANK CORPORATION, a New York corporation,

individually and operating by and through M&T Bank,

MANUFACTURERS AND TRADERS TRUST COMPANY, 

a.k.a. M&T Bank,

Defendants-Appellants.

________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Florida

________________________

(April 29, 2011)
Before PRYOR and COX, Circuit Judges, and WATKINS, District Judge. *

PER CURIAM:

After oral argument in this case, the United States Supreme Court decided

AT&T Mobility LLC v. Conception, No. 09-893, 2011 WL 1561956 (April 27, 2011). 

The district court’s order denying the motion to compel arbitration is VACATED, and

this case is remanded to the district court for reconsideration in light of the Supreme

Court’s opinion.

VACATED AND REMANDED. 

1

Honorable W. Keith Watkins, United States District Judge for the Middle District of *

Alabama, sitting by designation.

 This is an unlimited remand. 1

2
#### Duane F. THIELEN, Petitioner, v. The STATE of Florida, County of Dade, Respondent.

No. 73-585.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

June 29, 1973.

Rehearing Denied July 23, 1973.

PER CURIAM.

Certiorari denied.