alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit
10.25


 


Second
Amendment to Employment Agreement


 


This
Second Amendment to the Employment Agreement (this “Second Amendment”) is entered into as of this 27 day of June 2016,
by and between Joshua Hexter, an individual residing at Jerusalem, Israel (the “Executive”), and ORAMED
Ltd., a company incorporated under the laws of the State of Israel, with an address at Hi-Tech Park 2/4 Givat Ram, Jerusalem,
Israel 91390 (the “Company”).


 


WHEREAS,
the Company and the Executive entered into an Employment Agreement, dated as of April 15, 2013 (the “Original Agreement”),
which was amended on July 21, 2015 (the "First Amendment" and together with the Original Agreement - the “Employment
Agreement”); and


 


WHEREAS,
Company and the Executive desire to amend some of terms and conditions of the Employment Agreement.


 


NOW,
THEREFORE, the Company and the Executive agree as follows:


 


1.            In Section 2.1(a) - Salary of the Original Agreement, the following paragraph is hereby added:


 


As
of June 1st, 2015, the Executive shall be entitled to a gross monthly salary of NIS 44,891 (the “Salary”).





2.           
Except for the changes and/or additions stated herein, all the other terms of the Original Agreement shall remain valid and bind
the parties without any change. In the case of a contradiction between the provisions of this Amendment and the provisions of
the Original Agreement, the provisions of this Amendment shall prevail. Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, the
term “Agreement” as used in the Employment Agreement shall be deemed to be the Employment Agreement as amended by
this Amendment.


 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Amendment to Employment Agreement as of June 1st,
2016.


 





	 	Oramed
    Ltd.
	 	 
	 	/s/
    Nadav Kidron
	 	Nadav
    Kidron, CEO
	 	 
	 	/s/
    Joshua Hexter
	 	Joshua
    Hexter
#### Hazel GOOGE, Appellant, v. Ernest WALKER and Carmine Pinto, Appellees.

No. 72-1003.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Feb. 20, 1973.

Appeal from Court of Record, Broward County; John G. Ferris, Judge.

Appeal dismissed.
Exhibit 32.1




Certification Pursuant to 18 USC, Section 1350


As adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





In connection with the First Amended Report of Heartland Bridge Capital, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), James F. Groelinger, the Chief Executive Officer of the Company certify pursuant to 18 USC Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date:
April 8, 2011  By:
/s/ James F. GroelingerName: James F. GroelingerTitle:   Chief Executive Officer





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Heartland Bridge Capital, Inc. and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
MEMORANDUM

Date: February 15, 2012

Subject: Stakeholder call about MOVES Transition for Regional Conformity Analyses 

From: Meg Patulski, State Measures and Transportation Planning Center, OTAQ

To: Docket EPA-HQ-OAR-2011-0393

On March 2, 2011, a conference call was held to discuss stakeholder concerns regarding 

the transition to using MOVES for regional conformity analyses. EPA’s Office of 

Transportation and Air Quality hosted the call as a follow-up to a previous call held in October 

2010 with state and local transportation agencies. In addition to EPA, the following agencies 

were represented on the conference call: 

 MPOs from the following metropolitan areas: Houston-Galveston, TX; Dallas-Fort 

Worth, TX; Atlanta, GA; and Washington, DC 

 State DOTs from: Texas, New York, Virginia, Michigan, and Maryland

 Association of Metropolitan Planning Organizations (AMPO) 

 American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO) 

 Federal Highway Administration

These agencies confirmed that their previous concerns regarding the transition to using 

MOVES2010a for regional conformity analyses were still impacting their ability to complete 

MOVES-based modeling by March 2, 2012, and they requested additional transition time for 

using MOVES in regional conformity analyses. 

EPA expressed its intentions to proceed with a rulemaking to extend the MOVES2010 

regional conformity analysis grace period. All agencies strongly supported EPA’s decision to 

proceed with this rulemaking.
December 3, 2015

In accordance with the enclosed Memorandum Opinion, below is the judgment in the numbered cause set out herein to be entered in the Minutes of this Court as of the 3rd day of December, 2015.

10-15-00270-CR	RICHARD BRENT REED v. THE STATE OF TEXAS - ON APPEAL FROM THE 66TH DISTRICT COURT OF HILL COUNTY - TRIAL COURT NO. 37886 – AFFIRMED - Memorandum Opinion by Justice Scoggins:

	“This cause came on to be heard on the transcript of the record of the Court below, and the same being considered, because it is the opinion of this Court that there was no error in the judgment, it is ordered, adjudged and decreed by the Court that the judgment be in all things affirmed, and that the appellant pay all costs in this behalf expended and that this decision be certified below for observance.”

# image1.png
EXHIBIT 32.1





CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER





PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)





In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2017 (the “Report”) of New Mountain Finance Corporation (the “Registrant”), as filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Robert A. Hamwee, the Chief Executive Officer of the Registrant, hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge, that:





|    |                                                                                                                                  
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

|    |                                                                                                                                                        
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.




/s/ ROBERT A. HAMWEEName:Robert A. HamweeDate:August 8, 2017
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Peter J. Coppaway, Appellant.

[722 NYS2d 813]

Mercure, J.

Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of St. Lawrence County (Nicandri, J.), rendered April 14, 2000, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crime of rape in the first degree.

Defendant’s trial on an indictment charging rape in the first degree ended in a mistrial when the jury was unable to reach a verdict. Prior to the scheduled retrial, defendant entered a plea of guilty to the indictment and was sentenced to the agreed-upon determinate prison term of 7V2 years. Although the plea bargain included defendant’s waiver of the right to appeal, he now appeals and contends that the plea and waiver were coerced and that the sentence is harsh and excessive.

Defendant contends that he was coerced into pleading guilty by the District Attorney’s threat to seek a superceding indictment which would include previously undisclosed sodomy charges revealed during the victim’s trial testimony. “Although defendant’s waiver of the right to appeal does not in and of itself preclude our review * * * defendant’s failure to move to withdraw his guilty plea or to vacate the judgment of conviction renders defendant’s arguments unpreserved for our review” *(People v Wood,*277 AD2d 515, 516 [citations omitted]). In any event, defendant stated during the plea allocution that he was pleading voluntarily and of his own free will, that he had ample opportunity to consult with counsel and that there had been no threats. Contrary to his current claim that his plea was induced by the threat of additional charges, he stated at sentencing that he pleaded guilty to avoid the risk of a greater prison term, a valid consideration given the 25-year maximum possible sentence on a conviction of rape in the first degree *(see,*Penal Law § 70.02 [3] [a]). Defendant’s unsubstantiated challenge to the voluntariness of his plea would, if preserved, provide no basis to disturb the plea and waiver of the right to appeal *(see, People v La Fave,*265 AD2d 740, 741). Furthermore, in light of his valid waiver of the right to appeal, we decline to review defendant’s claim that the agreed-upon sentence, which is considerably less than the harshest possible, was harsh and excessive *(see, People v Young,*253 AD2d 982, *lv denied*92 NY2d 1055).

Cardona, P. J., Mugglin, Rose and Lahtinen, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
<PAGE>






                                  EXHIBIT 23.1

                        CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

The Board of Directors
Avant! Corporation

We consent to incorporation herein by reference of our report dated January 24,
2000, relating to the consolidated balance sheets of Avant! Corporation and
subsidiaries as of December 31, 1999 and 1998, and the related consolidated
statements of income, shareholders' equity, and cash flows for each of the years
in the three-year period ended December 31, 1999, and the related consolidated
financial statement schedule, which reports appear in the December 31, 1999
Annual Report on Form 10-K of Avant! Corporation.

/s/ KPMG LLP
-------------------------

September 19, 2000
Mountain View, California
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3693 Reported in House (RH)]

                                                 House Calendar No. 146

103d CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 3693

                          [Report No. 103-456]

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

To designate the United States courthouse under construction in Denver, 
       Colorado, as the ``Byron White United States Courthouse''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                             March 24, 1994

        Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed

                                                 House Calendar No. 146
103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 3693

                          [Report No. 103-456]

To designate the United States courthouse under construction in Denver, 
       Colorado, as the ``Byron White United States Courthouse''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           November 22, 1993

 Mr. Schaefer introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
              Committee on Public Works and Transportation

                             March 24, 1994

        Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To designate the United States courthouse under construction in Denver, 
       Colorado, as the ``Byron White United States Courthouse''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The United States courthouse being constructed through renovation 
of the old post office building in Denver, Colorado, shall be known and 
designated as the ``Byron White United States Courthouse''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the courthouse referred to in section 1 
shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Byron White United States 
Courthouse''.
```
Exhibit 32.1  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Annual Report of Discovery Oil, Ltd, (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ending December 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Andrew V. Ippolito, President and Chairman of the Board of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.   /s/ Andrew V. Ippolito By  __________________________________ Andrew V. Ippolito President, Chairman of the Board Date:  April 14, 2008
#### BARLOW v. BROWN.

No. 37259.

Supreme Court of Florida.

April 1968.

Certiorari denied without opinion. 206 So.2d 408.
SO 2014 off change 8-K Ex 10-1






EXHIBIT 10.1


SUMMARY OF NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTOR COMPENSATION ARRANGEMENTS


THE SOUTHERN COMPANY


Only non-employee directors are compensated for service on the Board of Directors (the "Board") of The Southern Company.


Effective January 1, 2014, the pay components are as follows:


	
			
	·
	Annual Cash Retainer Fee:
	$100,000

	·
	Committee Chair Annual Retainer:
	$20,000

	·
	Presiding Director Annual Retainer:
	$20,000

	·
	Annual Stock Retainer Fee:
	$120,000 payable in deferred common stock units until Board membership ends

	·
	Board Meeting Fees:
	Meeting fees are not paid for participation in the initial eight meetings of the Board in a calendar year.  If more than eight meetings of the Board are held in a calendar year, $2,500 will be paid for participation in each meeting of the Board beginning with the ninth meeting.
# C_2018035EN.01015301.xml

| 31.1.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 35/153 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

31.1.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 35/153

---

P8_TA(2016)0026

Amendments to the 1998 Protocol to the 1979 Convention on long-range transboundary air pollution on heavy metals ***

European Parliament legislative resolution of 2 February 2016 on the draft Council decision on the acceptance of the Amendments to the 1998 Protocol to the 1979 Convention on Long-Range Transboundary Air Pollution on Heavy Metals (08648/2015 — C8-0157/2015 — 2014/0359(NLE))

(Consent)

(2018/C 035/30)

The European Parliament,

The European Parliament

| — | having regard to the draft Council decision (08648/2015), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the draft Council decision (08648/2015),

| — | having regard to the Amendments to the 1998 Protocol to the 1979 Convention on Long-Range Transboundary Air Pollution on Heavy Metals (08648/2015 ADD 1), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the Amendments to the 1998 Protocol to the 1979 Convention on Long-Range Transboundary Air Pollution on Heavy Metals (08648/2015 ADD 1),

| — | having regard to the request for consent submitted by the Council in accordance with Article 192(1) and Article 218(6), second subparagraph, point (a), of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (C8-0157/2015), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the request for consent submitted by the Council in accordance with Article 192(1) and Article 218(6), second subparagraph, point (a), of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (C8-0157/2015),

| — | having regard to Rule 99(1), first and third subparagraphs, Rule 99(2), and Rule 108(7) of its Rules of Procedure, |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to Rule 99(1), first and third subparagraphs, Rule 99(2), and Rule 108(7) of its Rules of Procedure,

| — | having regard to the recommendation of the Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety (A8-0002/2016), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the recommendation of the Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety (A8-0002/2016),

| 1. | Gives its consent to acceptance of the Amendments to the Protocol; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Gives its consent to acceptance of the Amendments to the Protocol;

| 2. | Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council, the Commission and the governments and parliaments of the Member States. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council, the Commission and the governments and parliaments of the Member States.

---
EXHIBIT 24.1
 ENERGY FOCUS INC.
 2010 ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K
 Power of Attorney
    /s/ Joseph G. Kaveski

Joseph G. Kaveski
    
    
    
    /s/ Frank Lamanna

Frank LamannaChief Executive Officer and Director
    
    
    
    interim Chief Accounting OfficerPrincipal Executive Officer
    
    
    
    (principal accounting officer)/s/ John M. Davenport
    
    
    
    /s/ R. Louis SchneebergerJohn M. Davenport
    
    
    
    R. Louis SchneebergerPresident and Director
    
    
    
    Director/s/ Michael A. Kasper
    
    
    
    /s/ Paul von PaumgarttenMichael A. Kasper
    
    
    
    Paul von PaumgarttenDirector
    
    
    
    Lead Director/s/ J. James Finnerty
    
    
    
    /s/ David AnthonyJ. James Finnerty
    
    
    
    David AnthonyDirector
    
    
    
    Director
 83
#### ESCOM ENTERPRISES, INC., Appellant, v. JOHN W. MOORE CONSTRUCTION CORP., Appellee.

No. 72-651.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Feb. 13, 1973.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Broward County; John H. Moore, II, Judge.

Appeal dismissed.
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 167 (Tuesday, August 28, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Pages 43950-43951]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-18536]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

[Disaster Declaration #15657 and #15658; CONFEDERATED TRIBES of the 
COLVILLE RESERVATION Disaster Number WA-00071]


Presidential Declaration of a Major Disaster for Public 
Assistance Only for the Confederated Tribes of the Colville Reservation

AGENCY: U.S. Small Business Administration.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This is a Notice of the Presidential declaration of a major 
disaster for Public Assistance Only for the Confederated Tribes of the 
Colville Reservation (FEMA-4384-DR), dated 08/17/2018.
    Incident: Flooding.
    Incident Period: 05/05/2018 through 05/28/2018.

DATES: Issued on 08/17/2018.
    Physical Loan Application Deadline Date: 10/16/2018.
    Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date: 05/17/2019.

ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business 
Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport 
Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A. Escobar, Office of Disaster 
Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street SW, 
Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416, (202) 205-6734.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that as a result of 
the President's major disaster declaration on 08/17/2018, Private Non-
Profit organizations that provide essential services of a governmental 
nature may file disaster loan applications at the address listed above 
or other locally announced locations.
    The following areas have been determined to be adversely affected 
by the disaster:

Primary Area: Confederated Tribes of the Colville Reservation

    The Interest Rates are:

[[Page 43951]]



------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                Percent
------------------------------------------------------------------------
For Physical Damage:
  Non-Profit Organizations with Credit Available Elsewhere...      2.500
  Non-Profit Organizations without Credit Available Elsewhere      2.500
For Economic Injury:
  Non-Profit Organizations without Credit Available Elsewhere      2.500
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The number assigned to this disaster for physical damage is 156576 
and for economic injury is 156580.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number 59008)

James Rivera,
Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance.
[FR Doc. 2018-18536 Filed 8-27-18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
Order entered April 24, 2019

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05
- 19
- 00334
- CV MCLANE COMPANY, Appellant

V. SARAH EWING, INDIVID UALLY AND ON BEHALF OF MINOR CHILDREN, R .C.M.,

C.R.M., C.R.M., R.C. M., H.M.E., W.D.E., AND T.M.E., Appellee s On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 4

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. CC
- 18
- 01104
- D



### O RDER

T his is an accelerated appeal that has been consolidated with a mandamus. T he clerk’s record was due March 30, 2019. On April 17, 2019, appellant provided the Court with written verification that the clerk’s record has been paid for. In light of this, we ORDER the Dallas County Clerk to file, within TEN DAYS of the
date of thi s order, the clerk’s record. Appellant’s brief is DUE twenty days after the clerk’s record is filed. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P.
38.6.
/s/ KEN MOLBERG JUSTICE
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

HOWARD SCOTT ALLISON,

Petitioner

v.

BLAIR COUNTY COURT OF COMMON

PLEAS,

Respondent :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 47 WM 2023

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 22 nd day of December , 2023, the Petition for Writ of Mandamus is

DENIED.
MEMORANDUM OF EX PARTE COMMUNICATION

WITH THE DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Date: Thursday, May 28, 2015

Attendees: Lois Starkey (Vice President Regulatory Affairs Manufactured Housing 

Institute), Jim Dunn (Eagle River Homes), Phil Sailor (Eagle River Homes), Colin Burky 

(Eagle River Homes), Sam Hollister (Eagle River Homes), Robert Broderick (Patriot 

Homes Sales, Inc.), Kavita Vaidyanathan (DOE Office of the General Counsel), Michael 

Jensen (DOE Office of the General Counsel), Edward Barbour (Navigant), Matthew 

Walker (Navigant)

Summary: Eagle River Homes designs and builds manufactured and modular homes. On 

the morning of May 28, 2015 Kavita Vaidyanathan, Michael Jensen, Edward Barbour 

and Matthew Walker met with Jim Dunn, Phil Sailor, Colin Burky, Sam Hollister and 

Lois Starkey to tour the Eagle River Homes manufacturing facility in Leola, PA. 

Representatives from Eagle River Homes described its existing manufacturing process 

and compliance with current construction and safety standards set forth by U.S. 

Department of Housing and Urban Development. After the tour Kavita Vaidyanathan, 

Michael Jensen, Edward Barbour, Matthew Walker, Lois Starkey and Sam Hollister were 

given a tour of the Patriot Homes Sales, Inc. retail center in Kinzers, PA and saw some 

model manufactured and modular homes.