alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Office of Personnel Management

# AGENCY:

Office of Personnel Management.

# ACTION:

Announcement of meeting.

# SUMMARY:

The Hispanic Council on Federal Employment (Council) meeting will be held on at the following time and location shown below. The Council is an advisory committee composed of representatives from Hispanic organizations and senior Government officials. Along with its other responsibilities, the Council shall advise the Director of the U.S. Office of Personnel Management on matters involving the recruitment, hiring, and advancement of Hispanics in the Federal workforce. The Council is chaired by the Director of the U.S. Office of Personnel Management.

# DATES:

September 25, 2018 from 1:30 p.m. to 3:00 p.m.

# ADDRESSES:

Office of Personnel Management, 1900 E St. NW, Washington, DC 20415, Executive Conference Room.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Allison Wise, Program Director, Diversity and Inclusion, U.S. Office of Personnel Management, 1900 E St. NW, Suite 7439-I, Washington, DC 20415. Phone (202) 606-8462, FAX (202) 606-6012 or email at                         *Allison.Wise@opm.gov.*

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The meeting is open to the public. Please contact the U.S. Office of Personnel Management if you wish to present material to the Council at any of the meetings. The manner and time prescribed for presentations may be limited, depending upon the number of parties that express interest in presenting information.

Office of Personnel Management.

Jeff T.H. Pon,

Director.

[FR Doc. 2018-18323 Filed 8-23-18; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE 6820-B2-P
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Lillie Mae JACKSON.

No. 61850.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 7, 1978.

In re: Lillie Mae Jackson applying for supervisory writs and stay order. Parish of Orleans.

Granted. The conviction is affirmed, but the sentence is set aside and the ease is remanded to the district court for re-sentencing in compliance with Louisiana Act 635 of 1977, § 1 C.

SANDERS, C. J., SUMMERS and MARCUS, JJ., dissent from the order.
#### John C. Castlio, *et*al., Defendant in Error, *vs.*Greenbury Bishop, Plaintiff in Error.

1. *Judgment by default*— Diligence—Meritorious *defence*— A judgment by default regularly rendered, will not be set aside unless due diligence be shown, and an affidavit of a good and meritorious defence be filed.

*Error to St. Charles Circuit Court.*

*E. A.*Lewis, for Plaintiff in Error.

*T.*Bruere, for Defendant in Error.

Adams, Judge,

delivered the opinion of the court.

This case comes up on a question of practice. It was an action of ejectment. After one or two amended answers had been filed the plaintiff took leave to amend his petition, and filed an amended petition in vacation, which was occasioned by the adjournment of the same term to another day. At the meeting of the Court after this adjournment, the case by consent was continued till the next term. At the next term there being no answer filed, the plaintiff filed a motion for judgment for want of answer, which was taken up the next day and sustained, and a judgment for want of answer rendered and afterwards made final.

The defendant moved to set aside the judgment by default, and for leave to answer, upon the ground that no notice bad been served on him of the filing of the amended petition. *163Tins motion was heard by the court and overruled, but the bill of exceptions does not show what evidence was given upon the trial of the motion. Nor was there any affidavit of a meritorious defence filed with the motion.

This court must presume everything, in support of the judgment below, which can be fairly inferred from the record. As the evidence upon which the motion was decided is not preserved, we must infer that there was due proof of notice of filing the amended petition. Besides, a judgment by default regularly rendered will not be set aside unless there be due dilidenee shown, and also an affidavit of a good and meritorious defence filed. This seems to be the settled law in this State.

The judgment must be affirmed.

Judge Wagner concurs. Judge Bliss absent.
#### Charles E. WILLIAMS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 71-32.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Sept. 17, 1971.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER





PURSUANT TO 18 U.S. C. SECTION 1350


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO





SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Swingplane Ventures, Inc., (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Matthew Diehl, Chief Executive Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S. C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:





(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








Date:  November 12, 2010

/s/ Matthew DiehlMatthew DiehlChief Executive Officer and Principal Accounting Officer
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Petitioner

v.

RUSSELL ROBIN WATSON,

Respondent

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 134 WAL 2017

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 5th day of November, 2018, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED.
#### Richard Wayne SHEETS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. S-362.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

July 5, 1973.

Richard W. Ervin, III, Public Defender, and Robert C. Parker, Special Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., and Enoch J. Whitney, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The briefs and the record on appeal having been read and given full consideration, and the appellant having failed to demonstrate reversible error, the judgment of the lower court is affirmed. See Wright v. State, 251 So.2d 890 (Fla.App.1971) and McPhee v. State, 254 So.2d 406 (Fla.App.1971).

CARROLL, DONALD K., Acting C. J., and RAWLS and JOHNSON, JJ., concur.
EXHIBIT
5.1

[VINSON
& ELKINS L.L.P. LETTERHEAD]
August 23, 2000

HORIZON
Pharmacies, Inc.
531 West Main, Suite 100
Denison, Texas 75020

Ladies
and Gentlemen:

We
have acted as counsel for HORIZON Pharmacies, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the "Company"), in connection with the registration under the Securities Act of 1933 (the "Securities
Act") of 500,000 shares (the "Shares") of common stock, par value $.01 per share (the "Common Stock"), of the Company pursuant to the Company's Registration Statement on Form S-8 (the "Registration
Statement") filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Commission") on August 23, 2000.

In
reaching the opinions set forth herein, we have examined and are familiar with originals or copies, certified or otherwise identified to our satisfaction, of such documents and
records of the Company and such statutes, regulations and other instruments as we deemed necessary or advisable for purposes of this opinion, including (i) the Registration Statement, (ii) the
Certificate of Incorporation of the Company, as filed with the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware, (iii) the Bylaws of the Company and (iv) certain minutes of meetings of, and
resolutions adopted by, the Board of Directors of the Company.

We
have assumed that (i) all information contained in all documents reviewed by us is true, correct and complete, (ii) all signatures on all documents reviewed by us are genuine,
(iii) all documents submitted to us as originals are true and complete, (iv) all documents submitted to us as copies are true and complete copies of the originals thereof and (v) all persons executing
and delivering originals or copies of documents examined by us were competent to execute and deliver such documents. In addition, we have assumed that (i) the Shares will be issued in accordance with
the terms of the HORIZON Pharmacies, Inc. Employee Stock Purchase Plan (the "Plan"), (ii) the full consideration for each Share shall be received by the Company and in no event will be less than the
par value for each Share and (iii) certificates evidencing the Shares will be properly executed and delivered by the Company in accordance with the Delaware General Corporation Law (the "DGCL").

Based
on the foregoing and having due regard for the legal considerations we deem relevant, we are of the opinion that the Shares, when issued by the Company pursuant to the terms and
conditions of the Plan, will be legally issued by the Company, fully paid and non-assessable.

This
opinion is limited in all respects to the laws of the State of Texas, the DGCL and the federal laws of the United States of America. You should be aware that we are not admitted
to the practice of law in the State of Delaware.

This
opinion letter may be filed as an exhibit to the Registration Statement. In giving this consent, we do not thereby admit that we come within the category of persons whose consent
is required under Section 7 of the Securities Act or the rules and regulations of the Commission promulgated thereunder.



---
Exhibit 12.2

                CERTIFICATION OF THE PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
              PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(a) AND 15d-14(a), AS AMENDED

I, Kate Blankenship, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of CalPetro Tankers (Bahamas
II) Limited;

2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) for the company and have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the company's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) disclosed in this report any change in the company's internal controls over
financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual report
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
company's internal controls over financial reporting; and

5. The company's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal controls over financial reporting, to the
company's auditors and the audit committee of the company's board of directors
(or persons performing the equivalent function):

a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the company's ability to record, process, summarize
and report financial information; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls over
financial reporting.

Date: June 26, 2007


/s/ Kate Blankenship
--------------------
    Kate Blankenship
    Principal Financial Officer
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

______________________________

)

ABDULLAH WAZIR ZADRAN et al., )

)

Petitioners, )

)

v. ) Civil Action No. 05-2367 (RWR)

)

GEORGE W. BUSH et al., )

)

Respondents. )

______________________________)

ORDER

To ensure that the Guantánamo Review Task Force and its

Review Panel operating under Executive Order No. 13,492 have not

made any recommendations or decisions that would render

unnecessary or otherwise inefficient the further expenditure of

judicial and party resources in this matter, it is hereby 

ORDERED that on or before July 31, 2009, the respondents

shall file ex parte and under seal a report detailing the status

of each petitioner in this matter who is in the Guantánamo Review

Task Force review process. The status report shall state whether

the Task Force has reviewed the petitioners’ detention, and if

not, when it intends to do so. The respondents’ counsel shall

have a continuing affirmative obligation to ascertain whether the

Review Panel has made any decisions in connection with the

recommendations and, if so, notify the court of the results of

such decisions. 
-2-

SIGNED this 13th day of July, 2009.

 /s/ 

RICHARD W. ROBERTS

United States District Judge
#### Fancher R. HOWARD v. STATE of Mississippi.

No. 47115.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

Jan. 29, 1973.

Terry M. Haimes, Louisville, for appellant.

A. F. Summer, Atty. Gen. by John M. Kinard and Karen Gilfoy, Sp. Asst. Attys. Gen., Jackson, for appellee.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Choctaw County; Marshall Perry, Judge.

Before GILLESPIE, INZER, SUGG, WALKER and BROOM, JJ.

Affirmed.
Marti in, Michael (OST) Do \ -QST- . H^ T - 57^ H 

Subject: FW: Decision on Commercial Airline Service for Augusta, Matoe nOFPATlflW^^ 

m m^ 2\A A Ih 12 

From: Dean, John C [mailto:John.C.Dean@maine.gov] 

Sent: Wednesday, September 22, 2010 2:40 PM 

To: dennis.devane@dot.gov; Martin, Michael (OST); dennis.devane@dot.gov 

Subject: Decision on Commercial Airline Service for Augusta, Maine 

Greetings, 

Yesterday, Jay Bradshaw and I had a lengthy discussion regarding the decision to change the 

air carrier serving the Augusta, Maine airport. Subsequent to our conversation. Jay sent you 

the e-mail below and copied me. 

I was going to send a similar message but I think I will simply echo the points that Jay made. 

In my work, I am asked to speak at events around the country and sometimes internationally. In 

addition, I serve on the board of directors of a couple of national organizations, and I have 

been the president of one of the organizations. Serving in these positions requires a fair 

amount of air travel and, since my office is in Augusta and I live in Winthrop, I fly out of 

Augusta as often as I can. A lot of my travel takes me to Washington, DC. Flying US Airways on 

Colgan is very convenient because I can simply go from one gate (usually 7) to the gate that 

serves the hourly DC shuttle (usually gate 16,17, or 18). I have joked that it is so convenient, 

and I have done it so often, that I think I could go from one gate to the other with my eyes 

closed. I understand that the proposed new service would not be that convenient at all, and 

that I will have to travel to a different terminal to connect to US Airways. 

I hope that, as you review this important decision, you will take into consideration how this will 

affect those of us who travel in and out of Augusta. I also hope that you will take into 

consideration the conflict of interest issue that has been raised. 

John C. Dean 

State Fire Marshal 

52 State House Station 

Augusta, Maine 04333-0052 

207 626-3870
#### J. J. KATIBA, Appellant, v. Mariam V. Katiba COOK and Audrey M. Katiba, Appellees.

No. 1-445.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. First District.

Aug. 1, 1967.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
`[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3356 Engrossed in House (EH)]

103d CONGRESS

  1st Session

                               H. R. 3356

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

  To designate the United States courthouse under construction at 611 
 Broad Street, in Lake Charles, Louisiana, as the ``Edwin Ford Hunter, 
                    Jr., United States Courthouse''.






103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3356

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT


 
  To designate the United States courthouse under construction at 611 
 Broad Street, in Lake Charles, Louisiana, as the ``Edwin Ford Hunter, 
                    Jr., United States Courthouse''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The United States courthouse under construction at 611 Broad 
Street, in Lake Charles, Louisiana, shall be known and designated as 
the ``Edwin Ford Hunter, Jr., United States Courthouse''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the courthouse referred to in section 1 
shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Edwin Ford Hunter, Jr., 
United States Courthouse''.

            Passed the House of Representatives November 15, 1993.

            Attest:






                                                                 Clerk.`
EXHIBIT 32





FULUCAI PRODUCTIONS LTD.





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. Section 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of FuLuCai Productions Ltd. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending January 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Gordon Rix, as Secretary-Treasurer, Chief Financial Officer, Principal Financial and Accounting Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








Date: March 11, 2011
By:
/s/ Gordon RixName:
Gordon RixTitle:
Secretary-Treasurer, Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 1350 of Title 18 of the United States Code has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





The foregoing certification is being furnished as an exhibit to the Report pursuant to Item 601(b)(32) of Regulation S-K and Section 1350 of Title 18 of the United States Code and, accordingly, is not being filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission as part of the Report and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (whether made before or after the date of the Report, irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.)
LOCAL FLIGHT CHECKLIST

PREFLIGHT X

1. Obtain Permission

2. Check Local Airport Conditions/ VFR Charts Etc.

http://www.airnav.com/airport/kckb

3. File NOTAM 

http://www.airspacecoordination.org/files/2013NOTAMEntrySystem.pdf

4. Create Flight Plan in Ground Control Mission Planner.

5. Check NOTAMS : http://notams.aim.faa.gov/notamSearch/nsapp.html#/

6. Check Weather, www.weather.com

Sunrise ______

Sunset ______

Forecast ______

Winds ______

7. VFR Conditions (1000ft/3miles)?

8. Brief Observer

9. Clear TAKEOFF AREA

10. Post WARNING Sign

11. Run 3D Robotics Pre-Flight Checklist

12. Call local FBO/ATC

(304) 842-3400 or (304) 842-6700

POC Name ___________________

Time ___________________

Comments ___________________

13. ARM-TAKEOFF

POST FLIGHT X

1. Clear LANDING Area

2. LAND-DISARM

3. Run 3D Robotics Post-Flight Checklist

4. Disconnect Battery

5. Call local FBO/ATC

(304) 842-3400 or (304) 842-6700

POC Name ___________________

Time ___________________

Comments ___________________

6. Remove WARNING Sign

7. Outbrief Observer

8. Log Flight Data
1 

### Werner, Christopher

From: Werner, Christopher Sent: Friday, March 11, 2016 5:11 PM To: aaron_l_szabo@omb.eop.gov Cc: Lorang, Phil; Jones, Rhea; Beaver, Melinda; Marks, Matthew; Anderson, Lea; VanLare, Paula; Greenglass, Nora; Smith, Kristi; Palma, Eliz abeth; Wood, Anna; Harnett, Bill Subject: EPA responses to Interagency Comments Attachments: Rx fire aspects from EPA March 11 2016 part 2 v2.do cx
Categories: Regional Haze



### Aaron,

As discussed during today’s interagency call on EPA ’s proposed revisions to the regional haze rule, at tached please find document for interagency review.

Please let me know if you have any questions. Thank you,

Chris Werner US EPA – Office of Air Quality Planning and Standar ds Air Quality Policy Division (919) 541-5133 werner.christopher@epa.gov
EXHIBIT 23.2 CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC
ACCOUNTING FIRM We hereby
consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements (Forms
S-8 Nos. 33-78296, 33-84554, and 33-11765) of Hydron Technologies, Inc. and the
related prospectuses of our audit report dated January 12, 2009 with respect to
the consolidated balance sheet at September 30, 2008 and 2007 and consolidated
statements of operations, changes in shareholder equity and cash flows of
Hydron Technologies, Inc. for the years ended September 30, 2008 and 2007, the
nine-month period ended September 30, 2007 which is included on Form 10-K of
Hydron Technologies, Inc. for the year ended September 30, 2008. /s/ SHERB
  & CO., LLPBoca Raton,
  FloridaJanuary 12,
  2009