alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 3615

To amend the Federal Deposit Insurance Act to require Federal Deposit

Insurance Corporation approval for conversions of insured banks from

mutual form to stock form, and for other purposes.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

NOVEMBER 22, 1993

Mr. GONZALEZ (for himself, Mr. NEAL of North Carolina, and Mr. LEACH)

introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on

Banking, Finance and Urban Affairs

A BILL

To amend the Federal Deposit Insurance Act to require

Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation approval for conversions of insured banks from mutual form to stock

form, and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Mutual Bank Conver5 sion Act’’.
2

•HR 3615 IH

1 SEC. 2. FDIC REGULATION OF MUTUAL BANK CONVER2 SIONS.

3 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 18 of the Federal Deposit

4 Insurance Act (12 U.S.C. 1828) is amended by adding at

5 the end the following new subsection:

6 ‘‘(q) MUTUAL BANK CONVERSIONS.—

7 ‘‘(1) APPROVAL REQUIRED.—No insured State

8 bank may convert from the mutual form to the stock

9 form on or after November 22, 1993, except in ac10 cordance with regulations which the Corporation

11 shall prescribe.

12 ‘‘(2) REGULATIONS.—The regulations pre13 scribed by the Corporation pursuant to paragraph

14 (1) shall be substantially similar to the regulations

15 prescribed by the Director of the Office of Thrift

16 Supervision under section 5(i)(2) of the Home Own17 ers’ Loan Act.’’.

18 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE OF REGULATIONS.—The regu19 lations required to be prescribed by the Federal Deposit

20 Insurance Corporation pursuant to the amendment made

21 by subsection (a) shall take effect on or before the end

22 of the 90-day period beginning on the date of the enact23 ment of this Act.

Æ
# C_2014072EN.01003601.xml

| 11.3.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 72/36 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.3.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 72/36

---

Corrigendum to New national sides of euro circulation coins

(
  Official Journal of the European Union C 379 of 28 December 2013
  )

Official Journal of the European Union C 379 of 28 December 2013

2014/C 72/10

The text of notice 2013/C 379/11 ‘New national sides of euro circulation coins’ is replaced by the following:

‘New national sides of euro circulation coins

Euro circulation coins have legal tender status throughout the euro area. The Commission publishes all new euro coin designs (1) with a view to informing all parties required to handle coins in the course of their work as well as the public at large.

| | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 EURO CENT | 2 EURO CENT | 5 EURO CENT | 10 EURO CENT |
| | | | |
| 20 EURO CENT | 50 EURO CENT | 1 EURO | 2 EURO |

Image

Image

Image

Image

1 EURO CENT

2 EURO CENT

5 EURO CENT

10 EURO CENT

Image

Image

Image

Image

20 EURO CENT

50 EURO CENT

1 EURO

2 EURO

Issuing country: Vatican City State

Date of issue: January 2014

Description of the designs The 1-, 2- and 5-euro cent coins show the left profile of the new Head of State, Pope Francis. The words “CITTA DEL VATICANO” at the top, in semi-circle. The year of issuance “2014” and the mintmark “R” at the right.

The 10-, 20- and 50-euro cent coins depict the portrait of the new Head of State, Pope Francis. The words “CITTA DEL VATICANO” at the top, in semi-circle. The year of issuance “2014” and the mintmark “R” at the right.

The 1- and 2-euro coins show a portrait of the new Head of State Pope Francis slightly turned to the left. The words “CITTA DEL VATICANO” at the top, in semi-circle. The year of issuance “2014” and the mintmark “R” at the right.

The coin’s outer ring depicts the 12 stars of the European flag.

The edge-lettering of the 2-euro coin is: 2 *, repeated six times, alternately upright and inverted.’

---

(1)  See OJ C 373, 28.12.2001, p. 1, OJ C 254, 20.10.2006, p. 6 and OJ C 248, 23.10.2007, p. 8 for a reference to the other euro coins.

1

---
<PAGE>

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

                       SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                             WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

                           --------------------------

                                    FORM 8-K


                                 CURRENT REPORT
                     PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
                         SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934



                                 AUGUST 31, 2000
                Date of report (Date of earliest event reported)


                       BIG BUCK BREWERY & STEAKHOUSE, INC.
               (Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Charter)



          MICHIGAN                      0-20845              38-3196031
(State or Other Jurisdiction         (Commission            (IRS Employer
     of Incorporation)               File Number)      Identification Number)



                           550 SOUTH WISCONSIN STREET
                             GAYLORD, MICHIGAN 49734
          (Address of Principal Executive Offices, including Zip Code)



                                 (517) 731-0401
              (Registrant's Telephone Number, including Area Code)

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

<PAGE>

ITEM 5         OTHER EVENTS

        On August 31, 2000, Big Buck Brewery & Steakhouse, Inc. opened its
Grapevine, Texas unit, the first to open outside the State of Michigan. Located
between Bass Pro Outdoor World, a premier retailer of outdoor sports equipment,
and Embassy Suites Outdoor World Hotel and Convention Center on Bass Pro Drive,
the 20,500 square-foot Grapevine unit features a moderately priced, high quality
menu in a North Woods setting.

        Buck & Bass, L.P. operates this unit, pursuant to a joint venture
agreement between Big Buck Brewery & Steakhouse, Inc. and Bass Pro Outdoor
World, L.L.C.


                                       2
<PAGE>

                                   SIGNATURES

        Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the
registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned hereunto duly authorized on September 1, 2000.

                                           BIG BUCK BREWERY & STEAKHOUSE, INC.


                                           By: /s/ Anthony P. Dombrowski
                                              --------------------------------
                                                   Anthony P. Dombrowski
                                                   Chief Financial Officer

                                        3
#### Lloyd COHEN, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 71-193.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

July 2, 1971.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed.
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk's Office, Atlanta, September 10, 2024. I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written. , Clerk. 

# Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA, September 10, 2024 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order A25I0026. IN THE INTEREST OF M. R., A CHILD .
Upon consideration of the Application for Interlocutory Appeal, it is ordered that it be hereby GRANTED. The Appellant may file a Notice of Appeal within 10 days of the date of this order. The Clerk of Juvenile Court is directed to include a copy of this order in the record transmitted to the Court of Appeals.
LC NUMBERS: 2401669
EXHIBIT 23


                      Independent Auditors' Consent


We consent to the incorporation by reference in Post-Effective Amendment Number
6 to Registration Statement No. 2-54429 on Form S-8, Post-Effective Amendment
Number 9 to Registration Statement No. 2-42388 on Form S-8, and Registration
Statement Nos. 33-23709, 33-23710, 33-54176, 33-64729, 33-64731, 333-42915 and
333-66031 of A.T. Cross Company on Forms S-8 of our reports dated February 11,
1999, appearing in and incorporated by reference in this Annual Report on Form
10-K of A.T. Cross Company for the year ended December 31, 1998.


DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
Boston, Massachusetts
March 23, 1999
N O T FO R PUB L ICAT IO N UNITED STATES C OUR T OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH C IR C UIT UNITED STATES OF AM ERIC A, Plaintiff - Appe lle e , v. M ARIA ESTHER

FIGUER O ASALINAS, De fe nda

nt - Appe lla

nt. No. 12-10328

D.C . No. 4:11-c r-02258-C KJ M EM O R ANDUM *

Appe a l from

the Unite d

Stat e s Distric t C ourt for the Distric t of Ariz o na C indy K. Jorge nson, Distric t Judge , Pre s iding Subm itte d

June 18, 2013 ** B e fore : TALLM AN, M . SM ITH, a nd HUR W ITZ, C irc uit Judge s. M aria Esthe r Figue roa -Sa lina s a ppe a ls from

the distric t c ourt’ s judgm e nt and c ha lle nge s he r guilty -ple a c onvic tion a

nd 40-m onth se nte nc e for re e ntry a fte r de porta tion, in viola

tion of 8 U.S.C . § 1326. Pursua nt to Ande rs v . C

alifornia , 386 

# FIL ED JUN 21 2013 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U
. S
. CO URT O F APPEALS

* This disposition is not a ppropria te for public at ion a

nd is not pre c e de nt e xc e pt a s provide d

by 9th C ir. R . 36-3. ** The pa

ne l una nim ously c onc lude s this c a se is suita ble for de c ision without oral a

rgum e nt. Se eFe d. R . App. P. 34(a)(2).U.S. 738 (1967), Figueroa -Sa lina s’ s c ounse l ha s file d a brie f stating tha

t the re are no grounds for re lie f, a long with a m otion to withdra

w a s c ounse l of re c ord. W e have provide d Figue roa -Sa lina s the opportunity to file a pro se supple m e nta l brie f. No pro se supple m e nta l brie f or answe ring brie f ha s be e n file d. Our indepe nde nt re v i e w of the re c ord pursua nt to Pe nson v . Ohio , 488 U.S. 75, 80 (1988), disc lose s no a rgua ble grounds for re lie f on dire c t a ppe a l. C ounse l’ s m otion to withdra w is G RANT E D. The c ourt is in re c e ipt of Figue roa -Sa lina s’ s le tte r date d M ay 30, 2013. Insofa r a s the le tte r c an be c onstrue d a s a m otion for substitute

c ounse l, tha

t m otion is de nie d. AFFIRM E D.

1 2 - 1 0 3 2 8 2
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with theReport on Form 10-Q of Investors Financial Services Corp. (the “Company”)for the period ended March 31, 2006 as filed on May 4, 2006 (the “Report”),I, Kevin J. Sheehan, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, hereby certify,pursuant to 18. U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

 

1.               TheReport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.               Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

 

 
|  /s/Kevin J. Sheehan |   |
|---------------------------|--------|
| Kevin J. Sheehan          |   |
| Chairman and              |   |
| Chief Executive  Officer  |   |
|                      |   |
| May 4,  2006         |   |

 

A signed original of thiswritten statement required by Section 906 has been provided to InvestorsFinancial Services Corp. and will be retained by Investors Financial ServicesCorp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff uponrequest.

 

In connection with theReport on Form 10-Q of Investors Financial Services Corp. (the “Company”)for the period ended March 31, 2006 as filed on May 4, 2006 (the “Report”),I, John N. Spinney, Jr., Senior Vice President and Chief FinancialOfficer, hereby certify, pursuant to 18. U.S.C. Section 1350, as adoptedpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to myknowledge:

 

1.               TheReport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.               Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

 

 
|  /s/John N. Spinney, Jr. |   |
|------------------------------------|--------|
| Senior Vice  President and         |   |
| Chief  Financial Officer           |   |
|                               |   |
| May 4,  2006                  |   |

 

A signed original of thiswritten statement required by Section 906 has been provided to InvestorsFinancial Services Corp. and will be retained by Investors Financial ServicesCorp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff uponrequest.

 

----
#### Willie MONTGOMERY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1-237.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. First District.

April 18, 1967.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
Order entered January 12, 2015

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-14-00428-CR

HUGO SILVA, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 4

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. F12-53639-K

ORDER

The Court ORDERS the trial court to conduct a hearing to determine why appellant’s 

brief has not been filed. In this regard, the trial court shall make appropriate findings and 

recommendations and determine whether appellant desires to prosecute the appeal, whether 

appellant is indigent, or if not indigent, whether retained counsel has abandoned the appeal. See

TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(b). If the trial court cannot obtain appellant’s presence at the hearing, the 

trial court shall conduct the hearing in appellant’s absence. See Meza v. State, 742 S.W.2d 708 

(Tex. App.–Corpus Christi 1987, no pet.) (per curiam). If appellant is indigent, the trial court is 

ORDERED to take such measures as may be necessary to assure effective representation, which 

may include appointment of new counsel.
We ORDER the trial court to transmit a record of the proceedings, which shall include 

written findings and recommendations, to this Court within THIRTY DAYS of the date of this 

order.

This appeal is ABATED to allow the trial court to comply with the above order. The 

appeal shall be reinstated thirty days from the date of this order or when the findings are 

received, whichever is earlier.

/s/ ADA BROWN 

JUSTICE
CERTIFICATION OFCHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICERPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 I, Alexandre Frigon, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Xumanii, Inc. (the “Company”), hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge: (i)the annual report on Form 10-Q of the Company, for the period  ended January 31, 2013, and to which this certification is attached as Exhibit 32 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and(ii)the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  By:/s/Alexandre FrigonName:Alexandre FrigonTitle:Chief Executive Officer and ChiefFinancial OfficerDate:June 4, 2013 A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request. This certification accompanies the Form 10-Q to which it relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (whether made before or after the date of the Form 10-Q), irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-1324
SARAH ANNE SYKES, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus LOUIS DA VENPORT, A Law Enforcement Officer with the Town of Bladenboro, NC, in his individual capacity, Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Wilmington. James C. Fox, Chief District Judge. (CA-95-136) Submitted: November 26, 1996 Decided: December 18, 1996 Before MURNAGHAN and ERVIN, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. William Odum Richardson, Richard Brooks Glaz ier, BEAVER, HOLT, RICHARDSON, STERNLICHT, BURGE & GLAZIER, P.A., Fayetteville, North Carolina, for Appellant. Louis Davenport, Appellee Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the district court's order denying relief on her 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) complaint. We have reviewed the recordand the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Sykes v. Davenport , No. CA-95-136 (E.D.N.C. Feb. 29, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 23.1


                    CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

     As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the
incorporation by reference in this Amendment No. 1 to registration statement
on Form S-3 (registration statement No. 333-41488) of our report dated March
24, 2000 (except with respect to the matters discussed in Note 6, as to which
the date is April 6, 2000), included in Successories, Inc. Form 10-K for the
year ended January 29, 2000, and to all references to our Firm included in
this amended registration statement.

ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP


Chicago, Illinois

August 21, 2000
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3056 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3056

To amend certain provisions of title 5, United States Code, relating to 
     the treatment of Members of Congress for retirement purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 13, 1993

  Mr. Walker introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
               Committee on Post Office and Civil Service

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend certain provisions of title 5, United States Code, relating to 
     the treatment of Members of Congress for retirement purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. AMENDMENTS TO TITLE 5, UNITED STATES CODE.

    (a) Relating to the Maximum Annuity Allowable Pursuant to Cost-of-
Living Adjustments.--Section 8340(g)(1) of title 5, United States Code, 
is amended--
            (1) in subparagraph (A) by striking ``or'' after the 
        semicolon;
            (2) in subparagraph (B)--
                    (A) by striking ``employee or Member'' and 
                inserting ``employee'';
                    (B) by striking ``employee or Member,'' and 
                inserting ``employee,'';
                    (C) by striking ``employee's or Member's'' and 
                inserting ``employee's'';
                    (D) by striking the period at the end of 
                subparagraph (B)(ii) and inserting ``; or''; and
            (3) by adding at the end the following:
            ``(C) the final pay of the Member with respect to whom the 
        annuity is paid.''.
    (b) Relating to the Accrual Rate Applicable for Purposes of 
Computing an Annuity.--
            (1) CSRS.--Section 8339 of title 5, United States Code, is 
        amended--
                    (A) by striking subsection (c); and
                    (B) in subsection (a) by inserting ``or Member'' 
                after ``employee''.
            (2) FERS.--Section 8415 of title 5, United States Code, is 
        amended--
                    (A) by striking subsection (b); and
                    (B) in subsections (a) and (g) by inserting ``or 
                Member'' after ``employee'' each place it appears.

SEC. 2. EFFECTIVE DATE.

    The amendments made by this Act shall take effect on the date of 
the enactment of this Act and shall apply with respect to annuities 
commencing on or after such date.

                                 <all>
```
#### W. F. LASATER and Dimple Pauline Lasater, Appellants, v. Herman E. LASATER, Sr. and Horace Clarke Lasater, Jr., as Co-Administrators of the Estate of Horace Clarke Lasater, Sr., Deceased, Appellees.

No. 72-586.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

June 13, 1973.

Robert W. Smith, of Van Den Berg, Gay, Burke & Dyer, Orlando, for appellants.

Monroe E. McDonald, of Sanders, Mc-Ewan, Mims & McDonald, Orlando, for ap-pellees.

BOARDMAN, Judge.

Appellants, W. F. Lasater and Dimple Pauline Lasater, defendants in the trial court, have appealed from an order dismissing with prejudice their fifth amended counterclaim. The trial judge, the Honorable W. Troy Hall, Jr., circuit judge, Fifth Judicial Circuit, entered an order on May 11, 1972, granting appellants 20 days within which to show cause why their fifth amended counterclaim should not be dismissed with prejudice. Appellants failed to comply with the order and failed to show cause within the time period permitted therein. Therefore, the trial court entered its final order of dismissal on June 20, 1972.

We have examined the record, thoroughly we believe, and listened attentively to oral arguments by counsel for the respective parties and find no reversible error in the trial court’s findings and orders.

This court is further of the opinion that the doctrine of laches is applicable to the allegation of a resulting trust involved in this appeal. The record shows that an action was filed in the year 1950 by ap-pellees’ predecessor, Horace Clarke Lasater, Sr., deceased, to determine the title to the realty involved in this proceeding. Appellant, W. F. Lasater, filed his counterclaim in that proceeding but no further action was taken therein by either Horace Clarke Lasater, Sr., deceased, brother of appellants, W. F. Lasater and Dimple Paidine Lasater, or by any person or persons, claiming title to the real property involved herein. As a matter of record, it was not until approximately 17 years later that the appellants filed the counterclaim involved in the case subjudice. In support of our conclusion we cite the case of Martin v. Wilson, Fla.App.1959, 115 So.2d 573 (p. 575), as being applicable to this case.

> “[4] It is noted that a period of some eighteen years transpired between the *351date on which plaintiff alleges he acquired an interest in the disputed property and the date on which this suit was filed to establish his rights thereto. Courts of equity view with disfavor suits brought long after the transactions in issue have occurred, and long after death has closed the lips of those familiar with the occurrences remote in point of time. When such circumstances appear on the face of the complaint, and the delay in prosecuting plaintiff’s claim is unexplained, the doctrine of laches will bar relief.”

The ruling of the trial judge is, therefore,

Affirmed.

McNULTY, A. C. J., and FOGLE, HARRY W., Associate Judge, concur.