alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________ No. 95-30438 Summary Calendar

__________________ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus HARRY RANDOLPH, Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana

USDC No. 94-CR-20069

- - - - - - - - - - May 27, 1996 Before DAVIS, BARKSDALE, and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Harry Randolph appeals his conviction and sentence for conspiracy to possess with the intent to distribute cocaine base and for interstate travel in aid of an illegal activity. Randolph raises the following issues: the evidence was insufficient to convict him of the conspiracy charge; he was improperly joined under Fed. R. Crim. P. 8(b); the district court erred by failing to sever his trial from the trial of his codefendants; the district court erred by failing to grant aNo. 95-30438 -2- mistrial due to the prejudice from the evidence against the codefendants and unrelated to Randolph; the Double Jeopardy Clause was violated by the federal prosecution subsequent to the state prosecution and conviction; and the 1:100 sentencing disparity for cocaine base, as opposed to cocaine powder, violates due process and equal protection of the laws. We have carefully reviewed the record and the arguments. We conclude that the evidence was sufficient to conviction Randolph of the conspiracy charge. Randolph, by his own motion or through adoption of a motion by a codefendant, failed to raise joinder under Rule 8(b) before trial, and therefore, he waived the issue.
See Fed. R. Crim. P. 12(b)(2) & (f). The district court did not abuse its discretion in conducting the joint trial with the use of two juries or by denying the motion for mistrial. See United
States v. Krout , 66 F.3d 1420, 1430 (5th Cir. 1995), cert. denied , 1996 WL 26289 (U.S. Feb. 20, 1996); United States v. Limones , 8 F.3d 1004, 1007 (5th Cir. 1993), cert. denied , 114 S. Ct. 1543 (1994). The district court did not err in finding that Randolph failed to produce prima facie evidence of a nonfrivolous double jeopardy claim. See United States v. Cooper , 949 F.2d 737, 750-51 (5th Cir. 1991), cert. denied , 504 U.S. 975 (1992); United States v. Patterson , 809 F.2d 244, 247-48 (5th Cir. 1987). The ratio used for sentencing cocaine base trafficking offenses does not violate equal protection or due process. See United
States v. Watson , 953 F.2d 895, 897 (5th Cir.), cert. denied , 504 U.S. 928 (1992); United States v. Galloway , 951 F.2d 64, 65-66 (5th Cir. 1992).No. 95-30438 -3- Randolph's convictions and sentence are AFFIRMED.
<PAGE>

                              Arthur Andersen LLP

                                  Exhibit 23.1

                    CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the incorporation of our
reports included (or incorporated by reference) in this Form 10-K, into the
Company's previously filed Registration Statement File No. 333-00909.


                                         /s/ Arthur Andersen LLP

Seattle, Washington
August 10, 2000



                                      38
Exhibit 32

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


Certification of Chief Executive Officer

In connection with the Annual Report of Tradequest International, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2001 with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Peter
Johnson, Chief Executive Officer of the Company certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

September 18, 2003               /s/ Peter Johnson
-------------------              -----------------------------------
                                 Peter Johnson
                                 Chief Executive Officer


<PAGE>




Certification of Chief Financial Officer

In connection with the Annual Report of Tradequest International, Inc., (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2001 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Peter Johnson, Chief Financial Officer certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

September 18, 2003               /s/ Peter Johnson
-------------------              -----------------------------------
                                 Peter Johnson
                                 Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Discovery Oil, Ltd, (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ending December 31, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Andrew V. Ippolito, President and Chairman of the Board of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/ Andrew V. Ippolito

By  __________________________________

Andrew V. Ippolito

President, Chairman of the Board

Date:  April 14, 2004
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended, notice is hereby given of a meeting of the Center for Inherited Disease Research Access Committee.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         Center for Inherited Disease Research Access Committee.                    

*Date:*                         September 7, 2018.                    

*Time:*                         8:30 a.m. to 12:30 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         Center for Inherited Disease Research (CIDR), McHenry Conference Room, 1812 Ashland Avenue, Baltimore, MD 21205.                    

*Contact Person:*                         Barbara J. Thomas, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, Scientific Review Branch, National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health, 5635 Fishers Lane, Ste. 4076, MSC 9306, Bethesda, MD 20892-9306, 301-402-0838,                         *barbara.thomas@nih.gov.*

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.172, Human Genome Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: August 7, 2018.

Sylvia L. Neal,

Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2018-17340 Filed 8-10-18; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
p. 1 

# OAR Box 

# 1828 Prepped by Ollie Stewart



### Document

Number: 

# 224 ) ll-K - (I ) -3 7 Docket Number: 

# A-83-2 7

Printed 11/12/200811:12:56

AM Sheet 224 of 325P. 2

II-K-CJO-3 7
TECHNOLOG YASSESSMEN T REPOR T FO R INDUSTRIAL BOILE R APPLICATIONS : FLU E GA S DESULFURIZATION . Radia nCorporation . Novembe r 1979 . THI S INFORMATION

CA N B E FOUND I

N DOCKE T A-79-02 , ITE

M II-K-(I)-3 7
#### Bank of New York, Respondent, v Arthur Anthonisen, Also Known as Arthur C. Anthonisen, Appellant, et al., Defendants.

[721 NYS2d 555]

—In an action to foreclose a mort*442gage, the defendant Arthur Anthonisen, a/k/a Arthur C. Anthonisen, appeals from (1) an order of the Supreme Court, Orange County (Peter C. Patsalos, J.), dated August 23, 1999, which granted the plaintiffs motion for summary judgment, (2) a judgment of foreclosure and sale of the same court dated February 23, 2000, and (3) an amended judgment of foreclosure and sale of the same court dated April 13, 2000.

Ordered that the appeal from the order is dismissed; and it is further,

Ordered that the appeal from the judgment is dismissed as the judgment was superseded by the amended judgment; and it is further,

Ordered that the amended judgment is affirmed; and it is further,

Ordered that the respondent is awarded one bill of costs.

The appeal from the intermediate order must be dismissed because the right of direct appeal therefrom terminated with the entry of the amended judgment in the action (see, *Matter of Aho,*39 NY2d 241, 248). The issues raised on appeal from the order are brought up for review and have been considered on the appeal from the amended judgment (see, CPLR 5501 [a] [1]).

The plaintiff made a prima facie showing of entitlement to judgment as a matter of law (see, CPLR 3212; *Gateway State Bank v Shangri-La Private Club for Women,*113 AD2d 791, *affd*67 NY2d 627; *Winegrad v New York Univ. Med. Ctr.,*64 NY2d 851; *Zuckerman v City of New York,*49 NY2d 557, 562). In opposition, the appellant failed to raise any triable issues of fact.

The appellant’s remaining contentions are without merit. Ritter, J. P., Krausman, McGinity and Smith,- JJ., concur.
03/03/2010 1G:35 FAX 2024935142 FAA + DMS lgl002/003 

_!ii^yj./^«xv ±0: 1 < rAA 4;:a :izf iuu7 ANM 7 ® 002/003 

SCOITR. Moiuys 

FAA Ol'FICE OF REOIONAI. COUNSEL 

1601 LINDAVE.. SW 

RKNTON, WASHINGTON 98057 

'IT-LFPl lONE: 425.22 7.1417 

FACSIMILE: 425.227.1007 

In ihe Matter of: 

Sky West Airlines 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

WASHINGTON, D.C. 

FAA DOCKHT CF 09NM0012 

FAA Case No. 2009NM060042 

DMS No. FAA-2009-0979 

Judge Goodwin 

COMPLAINANT'S 1" SUPPLEMENTAL RESPONSE TO RESPONDENTS' INITIAL 

DISCOVERY REQUEST 

Complainant, through his undersigned counsel, hereby supplements its initial response to 

Respondent's Initial discovery request, served on January 22, 2010, as follows: 

REQUESTS FOR PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS 

REQUEST N0.3 : Aiiy and all documents the FAA will or may seek to introduce as 

exhibits at any trial or hearing in this action. 

Answer: Sec auached record of Sky West's violation history. (7 pages) 

REQUEST N0.5 : Any document created by Joan Peterson relating to Sky West de-icing 

operations from February 1, 2009 to present. 

Answer: See attached EPI 3.1.7 entries for her 2/10/09 de-icing inspection. (8 pages) 

Submitted this 1 st day of March 2010, 

Jcott R. Moms 

FAA Attorney 
03/03/2010 16:35 FAX 2024935142 

U^/Ui./2UlU ].3:17 FAX 425 227 1007 

FAA 

A^fM-7 

* DMS @|003/003 

121003/003 

1 

2 

3 

4 

S 

€ 

7 

9 

3.0 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

IS 

17 

16 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

2« 

27 

28 

29 

30 

31 

32 

33 

34 

3S 

36 

37 

39 

39 

40 

41 

42 

4.T 

44 

4S 

4£ 

47 

48 

4 9 

50 

51 

S2 

63 

V_. 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I hereby cenify that the foregoing Complainant's 1^' Supplemental Response to Respondent's 

Initial Discovery Request has been served via facsimile and certified mail - Remrn Receipt 

Requested this date, to the following: 

The Honorable Richard C, Goodwin (without exhibits) 

Office of hearings, M-20 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. 

East Building Ground Floor, Rm HI2-320 

Washington, D.C. 20590 

ThL: 202.366.2139 

FAX: 202.366,7536 

Federal Aviation Administration (without exhibits) 

800 Independence Avenue SW 

Washington, D.C. 20591 

Attn: Heai-ing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Wilbur Wright Building - Suiuj 2W1000 

FAX: 202.493.5142 

'J odd C, Emerson, Esq. 

Sky West Airlines 

444 South River Road 

St. George, UT 84790 

TEL: 435.634.3530 

FAX: 435.634.3505 

Dated this I" day of March, 2010. 

^i/-

:^^ii=. x il 

MOIFAIR CHIN 

Office of Regional Counsel (ANM-7) 

Federal Aviation Administration 

1601 LindAvc. SW 

Renton, W A 98057 

425.227.2160 

CompluinonCs •"Suppleineitlul Response to 

Respondent's Iniiial Discovery Rcqucrt 

-SkyWcsi Airlines - CPO9NMD012 

Page 2 of 2 

SCO rr R. MORRIS, f AA ATroRNifY 

I KL: 425.227.1417; FAX: 425.227,1007
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

April 29, 2014

N o. 04

- 14

- 00191

- CV

IN THE INTEREST OF D.R.P., A Child,

From the 150th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2012

- PA

- 03045 Honorable Barbara Hanson Nellermoe, Judge Presiding



### ORDER

The Appellant ’ s Agreed First Motion to Extend Time to File Brief is GRANTED. The appellant ’ s brief is due on May 19, 2014

. Because this is an appeal from an order terminating parental rights, no further extensions will be granted

.

_________________________________ Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 29th day of April, 2014

.

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
#### PAN AMERICAN WORLD AIRWAYS, INC., Petitioner, v. Mary G. WILSON and Florida Department of Commerce Industrial Relations Commission, Respondents.

No. 73-548.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

July 10, 1973.

Petition for certiorari to Industrial Relations Commission dismissed.
**Exhibit 21**

 

 
|   | **Subsidiaries of U.S. Xpress Enterprises, Inc.** |
|--------|---------------------------------------------------|
|   | **For Year Ended December 31, 2005**              |  
 

 

U.S. Xpress, Inc., a Nevada corporation

 
 

U.S. Xpress Leasing, Inc., a Tennessee corporation

 
 

Xpress Global Systems, Inc., a Georgia corporation

 
 

Xpress Company Store, Inc., a Tennessee corporation

 

Xpress Air, Inc., a Tennessee corporation

 
 

Xpress Holdings, Inc., a Nevada corporation

 
 

Xpress Colorado, Inc., a Georgia corporation

 
 

Xpress Nebraska, Inc., a Nebraska corporation

 
 

Colton Xpress, LLC, a California corporation

 
 

Xpress Receivables, LLC, a Nevada corporation

 
 

Cargo Movement Corp., a Nevada corporation

 
 

Xpress Waiting, Inc., a Nevada corporation

 
 

 

 

 

 

  |
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

AND PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350



In connection with this Annual Report of Omega Commercial Finance Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-KSB for the period ending December 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Jon S. Cummings IV, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certifies to the best of his knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                              
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|1. | Such Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the period ending December 31, 2007, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                                        
|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                              
|2. | The information contained in such Annual Report on Form 10-QSB for the period ending December 31, 2007, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Omega Commercial Finance Corporation.



Dated: April 11, 2008



OMEGA COMMERCIAL FINANCE CORPORATION.



By: /s/ Jon S. Cummings IV

Jon S. Cummings IV

Chief Executive Officer and

Principal Financial Officer
#### Lester L. HARDESTY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 67-310.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Second District.

Jan. 16, 1968.

Appeal dismissed.
#### Ben HOLLIDAY, Appellant, v. Sarah HOLLIDAY and The State of Florida, Appellees.

No. 72-913.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Nov. 14, 1972.

Rehearing Denied Dec. 20, 1972.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF THE PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)



Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned Chief Executive Officer of Daniels Corporate Advisory, Inc. (the "Company") does hereby certify, to the best of such officer's knowledge, that:



1. The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Daniels Corporate Advisory Company, Inc. (the Company) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and



2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Dated: October 19, 2015



/s/ Arthur D. Viola



|                            
|----------------------------
|Chief Executive Officer     
|and  Chief Financial Officer



The certifications set forth above are being furnished as an exhibit solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and shall not be deemed to be "filed" for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, nor shall they be deemed incorporated by reference in any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Daniels Corporate Advisory Company, Inc. and will be retained by Daniels Corporate Advisory Company, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT
TO SECTION 906


OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





The undersigned, Timothy J. Neher, the Chief Executive
Officer, Chairman of the Board of Directors and Treasurer of ACCELERATEDACQUISITIONS XIV, INC. (the “Company”), DOES
HEREBY CERTIFY that:





1.  The Company's Quarterly Report on Form
10-Q for the quarter endedSeptember
30, 2010 (the “Report”), fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934; and





2.  Information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operation of the Company.





IN WITNESS WHEREOF, each of the undersigned has executed
this statement this16thday ofNovember,
2010.





/s/ Timothy J. NeherTimothy J. NeherChief Executive Officer and Chief
      Financial
                          Officer





A signed original of this written statement required by
Section 906 has been provided to ACCELERATEDACQUISITIONS XIV,
INC. and will be retained by ACCELERATEDACQUISITIONS XIV,
INC. and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.