alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
AND

CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of
Nano Mobile Healthcare, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q/A for the quarter ended September 30, 2012 filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Joseph C. Peters, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



1.The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934; and



2.The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the consolidated
financial condition of the Company as of the dates presented and the consolidated result of operations of the Company for the periods
presented.



|By:    | /s/ Joseph C. Peters                                                 
|------ | ---------------------------------------------------------------------
|Name:  | Joseph C. Peters                                                     
|Title: | Principal Executive Officer, Principal Financial Officer and Director
|Date:  | October 28, 2016                                                     



This certification has been furnished solely pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
# C_2015425EN.01000501.xml

| 18.12.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 425/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.12.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 425/5

---

Notice for the attention of the persons subject to the restrictive measures provided for in Council Decision 2011/72/CFSP and Council Regulation (EU) No 101/2011 concerning restrictive measures directed against certain persons, entities and bodies in view of the situation in Tunisia

(2015/C 425/03)

The following information is brought to the attention of the persons that appear in the Annex to Council Decision 2011/72/CFSP (1), and in Annex I to Council Regulation (EU) No 101/2011 (2), concerning restrictive measures directed against certain persons, entities and bodies in view of the situation in Tunisia.

1

2

The Council intends to renew the restrictive measures provided for in Decision 2011/72/CFSP. The Council holds on its file new elements concerning all persons listed in the Annex to Decision 2011/72/CFSP and in Annex I to Regulation (EU) No 101/2011. The persons concerned are hereby informed that they may submit a request to the Council to obtain the information that relates to them, before 1 January 2016, to the following address:

| Council of the European Union |
| --- |
| General Secretariat |
| DG C 1C |
| Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175 |
| 1048 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |
| E-mail: sanctions@consilium.europa.eu |

Council of the European Union

General Secretariat

DG C 1C

Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175

1048 Bruxelles/Brussel

BELGIQUE/BELGIË

E-mail: sanctions@consilium.europa.eu

Any observations received will be taken into account for the purpose of the Council's periodic review, in accordance with Article 5 of Decision 2011/72/CFSP and Article 12(4) of Regulation (EU) No 101/2011.

---

(1)  OJ L 28, 2.2.2011, p. 62.

1

(2)  OJ L 31, 5.2.2011, p. 1.

2

---
---

Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, Benjamin Cherniak, President, of Online
Disruptive Technologies, Inc., hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

|(1) | the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Online Disruptive
      Technologies, Inc. for the three month period ended March 31, 2011 (the
      Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                      
|(2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of Online Disruptive Technologies,
Inc.                                                                             

|Dated: May 11, 2011 |                                                         
|------------------- | --------------------------------------------------------
|                    |                                                         
|                    |                                                         
|                    | /s/ Benjamin Cherniak                                   
|                    | Benjamin Cherniak, President                            
|                    | (Principal Executive Officer, Principal
      Accounting
|                    | Officer and Principal Financial Officer)                

A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the
signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this
written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Online
Disruptive Technologies, Inc and will be retained by Online Disruptive
Technologies, Inc and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.

---
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 3448

Relating to the tariff treatment of hand crafted stone figurines.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

NOVEMBER 4, 1993

Mr. DIXON introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee

on Ways and Means

A BILL

Relating to the tariff treatment of hand crafted stone

figurines.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. HAND CRAFTED STONE FIGURINES.

4 Chapter 71 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the

5 United States is amended by inserting in numerical se6 quence the following new subheading, with the article de7 scription having the same degree of indentation as the ar8 ticle description in subheading 7116.20.20:

‘‘ 7116.20.30 Hand crafted figurines of precious

or semiprecious stone, not jewelry

grade ................................................. 4.5% Free

(A,E,IL,J)

2.2% (CA)

30%

’’.
2

•HR 3448 IH

1 SEC. 2. APPLICABILITY.

2 The amendment made by section 1 shall apply with

3 respect to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse

4 for consumption, on or after the 15th day after the date

5 of the enactment of this Act.

Æ
# C_2015348EN.01000501.xml

| 21.10.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 348/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.10.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 348/5

---

Information communicated by Member States regarding closure of fisheries

(2015/C 348/08)

In accordance with Article 35(3) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1224/2009 of 20 November 2009 establishing a Community control system for ensuring compliance with the rules of the common fisheries policy (1), a decision has been taken to close the fishery as set down in the following table:

1

| Date and time of closure | 19.9.2015 |
| --- | --- |
| Duration | 19.9-31.12.2015 |
| Member State | Belgium |
| Stock or Group of stocks | SOL/7FG. |
| Species | Common sole (Solea solea) |
| Zone | VIIf and VIIg |
| Type(s) of fishing vessels | — |
| Reference number | 43/TQ104 |

Date and time of closure

19.9.2015

Duration

19.9-31.12.2015

Member State

Belgium

Stock or Group of stocks

SOL/7FG.

Species

Common sole (Solea solea)

Solea solea

Zone

VIIf and VIIg

Type(s) of fishing vessels

—

Reference number

43/TQ104

---

(1)  OJ L 343, 22.12.2009, p. 1.

1

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                         538,530
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,552,394
<ALLOWANCES>                                   120,000
<INVENTORY>                                    159,237
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,266,645
<PP&E>                                      10,527,992
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,689,875
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              20,792,474
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        7,211,580
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                      3,408
<COMMON>                                        15,041
<OTHER-SE>                                  28,665,869
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                20,792,474
<SALES>                                      4,924,491
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             4,924,491
<CGS>                                        4,502,503
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                6,620,146
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              (48,464)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             528,117
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (2,175,308)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (2,175,308)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (2,175,308)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.16)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.16)


</TABLE>
# C_2013314EN.01000401.xml

| 29.10.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 314/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.10.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 314/4

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

28 October 2013

2013/C 314/05

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,3784 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 134,65 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4596 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,85340 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 8,7464 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,2343 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,1300 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 25,732 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 292,73 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,7029 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,1855 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,4385 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,7373 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,4387 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4396 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 10,6871 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,6621 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,7062 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 462,91 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 13,5620 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 8,3888 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,6255 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 15 234,68 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,3220 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 59,389 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 43,9035 |
| THB | Thai baht | 42,817 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 3,0115 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 17,7631 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 84,8060 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,3784

JPY

Japanese yen

134,65

DKK

Danish krone

7,4596

GBP

Pound sterling

0,85340

SEK

Swedish krona

8,7464

CHF

Swiss franc

1,2343

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,1300

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

25,732

HUF

Hungarian forint

292,73

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,7029

PLN

Polish zloty

4,1855

RON

Romanian leu

4,4385

TRY

Turkish lira

2,7373

AUD

Australian dollar

1,4387

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4396

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

10,6871

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,6621

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,7062

KRW

South Korean won

1 462,91

ZAR

South African rand

13,5620

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

8,3888

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,6255

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

15 234,68

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,3220

PHP

Philippine peso

59,389

RUB

Russian rouble

43,9035

THB

Thai baht

42,817

BRL

Brazilian real

3,0115

MXN

Mexican peso

17,7631

INR

Indian rupee

84,8060

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

CARLOS MARTINEZ-NAVARRO,

 Petitioner,

 v.

LORETTA E. LYNCH, Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 13-74230

Agency No. A205-600-574

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted April 13, 2016** 

Before: FARRIS, TALLMAN, and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.

Carlos Martinez-Navarro, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for

review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing his appeal from an

immigration judge’s (“IJ”) removal order denying his request for a continuance. 

We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for abuse of discretion the

FILED

APR 18 2016

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

 * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

 ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
denial of a motion for a continuance, and review de novo claims of due process

violations. Sandoval-Luna v. Mukasey, 526 F.3d 1243, 1246 (9th Cir. 2008). We

deny the petition for review.

The agency did not abuse its discretion in denying Martinez-Navarro’s

motion for a further continuance to seek post-conviction relief where MartinezNavarro failed to show good cause. See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.29 (an IJ may grant a

motion for a continuance for good cause shown). Martinez-Navarro conceded

removability, he had been granted three prior continuances, and post-conviction

relief remained a speculative possibility at the time of his final hearing. See

Sandoval-Luna, 526 F.3d at 1247 (the denial of a continuance was within the

agency’s discretion where relief was not immediately available to petitioner);

Singh v. Holder, 638 F.3d 1264, 1274 (9th Cir. 2011) (“[T]he IJ [is] not required to

grant a continuance based on . . . speculations.”). 

To the extent Martinez-Navarro contends that the denial of a continuance

violated due process by preventing him from pursuing post-conviction relief, his

claim fails because he has not established error or prejudice. See Lata v. INS, 204

F.3d 1241, 1246 (9th Cir. 2000) (requiring error and prejudice to prevail on a due

process challenge).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

2 13-74230
# C_2015175EN.01000601.xml

| 29.5.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 175/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.5.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 175/6

---

Notice for the attention of the data subjects to whom the restrictive measures provided for in Council Regulation (EU) No 36/2012 concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Syria apply

(2015/C 175/04)

The attention of data subjects is drawn to the following information in accordance with Article 12 of Regulation (EC) No 45/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council (1):

1

The legal basis for this processing operation is Council Regulation (EU) No 36/2012 (2).

2

The controller of this processing operation is the Council of the European Union represented by the Director-General of DG C (Foreign Affairs, Enlargement, Civil Protection) of the General Secretariat of the Council and the department entrusted with the processing operation is the Unit 1C of DG C that can be contacted at:

| Council of the European Union |
| --- |
| General Secretariat |
| DG C 1C |
| Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175 |
| 1048 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |
| E-mail: sanctions@consilium.europa.eu |

Council of the European Union

General Secretariat

DG C 1C

Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175

1048 Bruxelles/Brussel

BELGIQUE/BELGIË

E-mail: sanctions@consilium.europa.eu

The purpose of the processing operation is the establishment and updating of the list of persons subject to restrictive measures in accordance with Regulation (EU) No 36/2012.

The data subjects are the natural persons who fulfil the listing criteria as laid down in that Regulation.

The personal data collected includes data necessary for the correct identification of the person concerned, the Statement of Reasons and any other data related thereto.

The personal data collected may be shared as necessary with the European External Action Service and the Commission.

Without prejudice to restrictions provided for in Article 20(1)(a) and (d) of Regulation (EC) No 45/2001, requests for access, as well as requests for rectification or objection will be answered in accordance with section 5 of Council Decision 2004/644/EC (3).

3

Personal data will be retained for 5 years from the moment the data subject has been removed from the list of persons subject to the asset freeze or the validity of the measure has expired, or for the duration of court proceedings in the event they had been started.

Data subjects may have recourse to the European Data Protection Supervisor in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 45/2001.

---

(1)  OJ L 8, 12.1.2001, p. 1.

1

(2)  OJ L 16, 19.1.2012, p. 1.

2

(3)  OJ L 296, 21.9.2004, p. 16.

3

---
#### Jane L. ROBINSON and R. Forster Robinson, Appellants, v. KIWANIS CLUB OF DELRAY BEACH, Florida, a Florida corporation, and First Baptist Church of Delray Beach, Florida, a Florida corporation not-for-profit, jointly, severally and individually, Appellees.

No. 71-909.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

July 17, 1972.

Rehearings Denied Aug. 25, 1972.

*388Robert D. Hurth, Fort Lauderdale, for appellants.

M. A. Coogler and Samuel H. Adams, of Adams & Coogler, West Palm Beach, for appellee, Kiwanis Club of Delray Beach.

John R. Beranek, of Jones, Paine & Foster, West Palm Beach, for appellee, First Baptist Church of Delray Beach, Fla.

PER CURIAM.

We reverse defendants’ summary judgment. Rule 1.510, F.R.C.P., 31 F.S.A.; Holl v. Talcott, Fla.1966, 191 So.2d 40.

An invitee tripped and fell at the edge of a parking lot and the issue is the adequacy of the lighting. The quality and quantity of the lighting from the testimony of lay and expert witnesses was in dispute.

We do not feel that it can be said from the record at this stage, as a matter of law, that the premises were so dark as to authorize a finding that the injured .person in going forward was guilty of contributory negligence under authority of Rubey v. William Morris, Inc., Fla.1953, 66 So.2d 218. Rather, we think that the issues of negligence and contributory negligence were, at the least, in the twilight zone so as to make a jury question as was authorized in Delany v. Breeding’s Homestead Drug Co., Fla.1957, 93 So.2d 116, See also Winsemann v. Travelodge Corporation, Fla.App.1967, 205 So.2d 315.

The summary judgment entered in favor of defendants is reversed and the case remanded for proceedings consistent herewith.

Reversed and remanded.

WALDEN and MAGER, JJ., and MELVIN, WOODROW, Associate Judge, concur.
#### Cape Girardeau Union Mill Company, Plaintiff in Error, *vs.*Charles Bruihl, Defendant in Error.

*1. Practice, civil*— Jury—Evidence.—In civil law cases it is for the jury to determine the weight of evidence.

*Error to Cape Girardeau Court of Common Pleas.*

*L.*Houck, for Plaintiff in Error.

*G. H.*Greene, for Defendant in Error.

Wagner, Judge,

delivered the opinion of the cour$.

The plaintiff brought its action against the defendant, to recover a certain amount of money it had deposited with him for the purpose of buying wheat; and also the value of a lot of sacks, which it was alleged were placed in his care and never returned.

The defence was, that the defendant kept the money in a good and sufficient iron safe, with his own money; and that on a *145specified day in the night time, his store was broken open, entered and burned, and the safe was broken open and the money stolen, with the money and other valuables of the defendant. And, as to the sacks, the defendant pleaded that after he had received them they were placed in his ware house, with his own goods, and that when his store was destroyed by fire, the sacks remaining in his possession were also destroyed; and that the money was lost and the sacks burned without any carelessness, negligence or fault on his part.

There was a trial before a jury who found a verdict for the defendant, upon which judgment was rendered.

There was abundant evidence to support the verdict. The only evidence given for the plaintiff, was of a negative char- • acter, and it was for the jury to determine the weight of the evidence, and we will not review their finding.

The instructions submitted the case fairly, and in as favorable a light for the plaintiff, as it could have asked.

Tinder the instructions, the jury must have found that the defence set up in the answer, was true in every particular, • and if so, defendant was not liable.

Judgment affirmed.

The other judges concur.
### Supporting Materials #3 Dispersion Modeling Not Applicable
United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

____________

No. 08-1127 September Term 2007

EPA-73FR4312

Filed On: May 2, 2008

Utility Air Regulatory Group,

Petitioner

v.

Environmental Protection Agency,

Respondent

_______

08-1129

Air Liquide America Specialty Gases LLC,

Petitioner

v.

Environmental Protection Agency,

Respondent

O R D E R

Upon consideration of the motion filed by petitioners in the above-captioned

cases to hold cases in abeyance, it is

ORDERED, on the court’s own motion, that the above-captioned cases be

consolidated. It is

FURTHER ORDERED that the motion to hold in abeyance be granted, and

these cases be held in abeyance pending further order of the court.

Petitioners are directed to file a status report 90 days from the date of this order. 

The parties are directed to file motions to govern further proceedings no later than 180

days from the date of this order. 

FOR THE COURT:

Mark J. Langer, Clerk 

BY: /s/

Sabrina M. Crisp 

Deputy Clerk