alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
CERTIFICATION

I, Jeremy Mork,  certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of China Bright Star Limited;

2.
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary
to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which
such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;

3.
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows
of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.
The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I am responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) and internal
control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) for the registrant and have:

(a)
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to
us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared;

(b)
Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such
internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our
supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability
of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements
 for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles

(c)
Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end
of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(d)
Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's
most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in
the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal
control over financial reporting; and

5.
The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):

(a)
All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to
record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b)
Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
control over financial reporting.
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER


PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Tamir Levinas, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the quarterly report of Progaming Platforms Corp. on Form 10-Q for the three months ended March 31, 2011 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such quarterly report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of Progaming Platforms Corp. as of and for the periods presented in such quarterly report on Form 10-Q. This written statement is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission as an exhibit accompanying such quarterly report and shall not be deemed filed pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.





By:  /s/Tamir Levinas


Name:  Tamir Levinas


Title:    Chief Executive Officer





Date: May 16, 2011
EXHIBIT
32.1




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the Annual Report of The Singing Machine Company, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the year ended March 31, 2010 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Gary
Atkinson, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:




(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.




A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
The Singing Machine Company, Inc. and will be retained by The Singing Machine
Company, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.





/S/
      Gary AtkinsonGary
      Atkinson
                Chief
      Executive Officer
                (Principal
      Executive Officer)
                Date:
      July 14, 2010
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 360 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 360

   To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to make permanent the 
provisions permitting tax-exempt treatment for certain qualified small 
                              issue bonds.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 5, 1993

Ms. Slaughter introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to make permanent the 
provisions permitting tax-exempt treatment for certain qualified small 
                              issue bonds.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PERMANENT EXTENSION OF TAX-EXEMPT TREATMENT FOR CERTAIN 
              QUALIFIED SMALL ISSUE BONDS.

    (a) In General.--Subparagraph (B) of section 144(a)(12) of the 
Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to termination dates) is 
amended by striking all that follows clause (ii) and inserting 
``subparagraph (A) shall not apply''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by this section shall apply 
to bonds issued after June 30, 1992.

                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 23.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PETROLEUM ENGINEERS

Ralph E. Davis Associates, Inc. hereby consents to the reference to our firm and to its having prepared a report of DOMINION RESOURCES BLACK WARRIOR TRUST
(the Company), and an estimate of the proved gas reserves for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2014. We hereby further consent to the use of the report dated March 23, 2015 appearing in the Companys Form 10-K for the
year ended December 31, 2014 and in all current and future registration statements of the Company that incorporate by reference such Form 10-K.





RALPH E. DAVIS ASSOCIATES, INC.By:

/s/ Allen C. BarronName: Allen C. BarronTitle: President


March 23, 2015

Consultants to the Oil and Natural Gas Industries Since the 1920s
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 3156

To authorize the Secretary of Transportation to convey for scrapping by

the Virginia V Foundation (a non-profit organization) a vessel in the

National Defense Reserve Fleet that is scheduled to be scrapped.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

SEPTEMBER 28, 1993

Mrs. UNSOELD (for herself, Mr. DICKS, Mr. KREIDLER, Mr. MCDERMOTT,

and Mr. SWIFT) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Merchant Marine and Fisheries

A BILL

To authorize the Secretary of Transportation to convey for

scrapping by the Virginia V Foundation (a non-profit

organization) a vessel in the National Defense Reserve

Fleet that is scheduled to be scrapped.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. CONVEYANCE OF NDRF VESSEL FOR SCRAP4 PING BY VIRGINIA V FOUNDATION.

5 (a) SHORT TITLE.—This section may be cited as the

6 ‘‘VIRGINIA V Restoration Act of 1993’’.

7 (b) VESSEL CONVEYANCE AUTHORITY.—
2

•HR 3156 IH

1 (1) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding any other

2 law, the Secretary of Transportation may convey to

3 the VIRGINIA V Foundation (a nonprofit organiza4 tion located in Seattle, Washington; hereinafter in

5 this section referred to as the ‘‘Foundation’’), with6 out consideration, all right, title, and interest of the

7 United States Government in a vessel which—

8 (A) is in the National Defense Reserve

9 Fleet on the date of the enactment of this sec10 tion;

11 (B) is of not less than 4,000 displacement

12 tons;

13 (C) has no usefulness to the Government;

14 and

15 (D) is scheduled to be scrapped.

16 (2) CONDITION.—As a condition of conveying a

17 vessel to the Foundation pursuant to this section,

18 the Secretary shall require that the Foundation

19 enter into an agreement with the Secretary which re20 quires that the Foundation—

21 (A) sell the vessel for scrap purposes;

22 (B) use the proceeds of that scrapping for

23 expenses directly related to the preservation

24 and restoration of the historic steamship VIR25 GINIA V, located in Seattle, Washington;
3

•HR 3156 IH

1 (C) have raised, before the date of convey2 ance authorized by paragraph (1), at least

3 $100,000 from non-Federal sources for use for

4 that purpose; and

5 (D) comply with any other conditions the

6 Secretary considers appropriate.

7 (c) DELIVERY.—The Secretary shall deliver a vessel

8 conveyed under this section to the Foundation—

9 (1) at the place where the vessel is located on

10 the date of the approval of the conveyance;

11 (2) in its condition on that date; and

12 (3) without cost to the Government.

13 (d) EXPIRATION.—The authority of the Secretary to

14 convey a vessel under this section expires on the date

15 which is 2 years after the date of the enactment of this

16 Act.

17 (e) TREATMENT OF AMOUNTS AVAILABLE TO FOUN18 DATION.—Amounts available to, or used by, the Founda19 tion pursuant to subsection (b)(2)(B) or (C) shall not be

20 considered in any determination of the amounts available

21 to the Department of the Interior for the VIRGINIA V

22 Foundation.

Æ
#### STATE of Louisiana ex rel. Joe Nathan TUBBS v. C. Murray HENDERSON, Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary.

No. 54304.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Feb. 1, 1974.

In re: Joe Nathan Tubbs applying for remedial writs and writ of habeas corpus.

Writ denied. The showing made does not entitle relator to the relief sought. •>
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-50435 Summary Calendar

URSULA GOMEZ; RUDY GOMEZ, Plaintiffs-Appellants,

versus NORTH AMERICAN VAN LINES, INC.; ET AL., Defendants, NORTH AMERICAN VAN LINES, INC.; NORTH AMERICAN VAN LINES OF TEXAS, INC., Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. EP-95-CV-295-F

- - - - - - - - - - May 5, 1999 Before DAVIS, DUHE’, and PARKER, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Ursula Gomez and Rudy Gomez appeal the district court’s grant of summary judgment and final judgment to North American Van Lines, Inc. and North American Van Lines of Texas, Inc. (herein after referred to collectively as NAVL). The Gomezes sued NAVL for damages relating to a shipment of their personal property from Germany to Texas. The district court based itsNo. 98-50435 -2- decision to grant summary judgment to NAVL on the finding that the parties had entered into a settlement agreement and an accord and satisfaction resolving the Gomezes’ claims. In their appellate briefs, the only pertinent argument the Gomezes raise is whether any agreement they made with NAVL should be nullified because the insurance policy they received as part of the settlement was worthless and was fraudulently obtained by NAVL. There is no record evidence to support this argument. The Gomezes’ remaining arguments are waived for inadequate briefing or failure to raise the issue before the district court. See F ED . R. A PP . P. 28(a); Yohey v. Collins , 978 F.2d 222, 224-25 (5th Cir. 1995). Therefore, this appeal is DISMISSED as frivolous. NAVL’s request for fees and costs was not made by separate motion in accordance with F ED . R. A PP . P. 38 and is DENIED. APPEAL DISMISSED.
#### SHELL OIL COMPANY, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Anna B. MERRETT et al., Defendants-Appellants.

No. 3772.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Third Circuit.

March 16, 1972.

James L. Davis, Many, for defendants-appellants.

A. J. Moore, New Orleans, Colvin, Hunter & Brown by D. Scott Brown, Mansfield, for plaintiff-appellee.

Before SAVOY, MILLER and DOMEN-GEAUX, JJ.

MILLER, Judge.

This case having been called for argument in the manner and at the time prescribed in the Uniform Rules of the Courts of Appeal, Rule V, Section 4, and the appellants having neither appeared nor filed a brief prior to the time the case was called for argument, the appeal is considered abandoned and is dismissed at appellant’s cost. Uniform Rules, Courts of Appeal, Rule VII, Section 5(b), as revised June 1, 1971.

Appeal dismissed.
# C_2015183EN.01000401.xml

| 4.6.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 183/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.6.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 183/4

---

Notification by Italy of the application of Article 19(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1008/2008 of the European Parliament and the Council concerning traffic distribution rules for the airports Milan Malpensa, Milan Linate and Orio al Serio (Bergamo)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2015/C 183/05)

Pursuant to Article 19(3) of Regulation (EC) No 1008/2008 of the European Parliament and the Council of 24 September 2008 on common rules for the operation of air services in the Community (1), on 23 April 2015 the Commission received notification from Italy of the Ministerial Decree No 395 of 1 October 2014 amending Decree No 15 of 3 March 2000 on the distribution of air traffic within the Milan airport system, as amended (2).

1

2

By Commission Decision of 21 December 2000 (3) the Commission had declared as compatible with Council Regulation (EEC) No 2408/92 of 23 July 1992 on access for Community air carriers to intra-Community air routes (4) the traffic distribution rules for the Milan airport system set out in the Ministerial Decree No 15 of 3 March 2000 subject to these rules being amended as indicated by the Italian authorities in a letter of 4 December 2000. This amendment took place through the Ministerial Decree No 14 of 5 January 2001.

3

4

Ministerial Decree No 395 of 1 October 2014 modifies the traffic distribution rules within the Milan airport system. It removes any limitations at Linate airport on the number of daily return services to EU airports identified on the basis of passenger traffic volume. The limitations with respect to the use of narrow-body (single-aisle) aircraft and the operation of point-to-point scheduled connections at Linate airport remain in place.

The Commission invites interested parties to submit their comments within 15 days of publication of this communication, to:

| European Commission |
| --- |
| Directorate-General for Mobility and Transport (Unit E.4 Internal Market and Airports) |
| Office: DM24 05/84 |
| 1049 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |
| E-mail: emmanuelle.maire@ec.europa.eu |

European Commission

Directorate-General for Mobility and Transport (Unit E.4 Internal Market and Airports)

Office: DM24 05/84

1049 Bruxelles/Brussel

BELGIQUE/BELGIË

E-mail: emmanuelle.maire@ec.europa.eu

---

(1)  OJ L 293, 31.10.2008, p. 3.

1

(2)  Italian Official Gazette No 237 of 11 October 2014.

2

(3)  OJ L 58, 28.2.2001, p. 29.

3

(4)  OJ L 240, 24.8.1992, p. 8. Repealed by Article 27 of Regulation (EC) No 1008/2008.

4

---
The State of

Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

November 6, 2014

No. 04-14-00323-CR

Steven BELTRAN,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the County Court at Law No. 13, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 431439

The Honorable Monica A. Gonzalez, Judge Presiding

ORDER

Appellant’s brief was originally due on July 7, 2014, and appellant has been granted three

extensions of time, the latest until September 22, 2014. Appellant is represented on appeal by 

appointed counsel, Mr. Alfonso Otero. On September 22, 2014, Mr. Otero filed a motion asking 

this court to abate this appeal so that he may request findings of fact and conclusions of law from 

the trial court. Mr. Otero concedes such findings and conclusions were not timely requested 

pursuant to Texas Rule of Civil Procedure 296. On September 24, 2014, this court issued an 

order granting Mr. Otero’s request and abating this cause to the trial court to provide the trial 

court with an opportunity to decide whether it wishes to enter findings of fact and conclusions of 

law. On November 6, 2014, a supplemental clerk’s record was filed containing findings of fact 

and conclusions of law.

Because this appeal has been pending since May 5, 2014, when appellant filed his notice 

of appeal, and appellant’s brief was originally due on July 7, 2014, Mr. Otero is hereby 

ORDERED to file appellant’s brief no later than December 5, 2014. No further extensions of 

time will be granted, and if Mr. Otero fails to file appellant’s brief by December 5, 2014, this 

appeal will be abated to the trial court for an abandonment hearing.

_________________________________

Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 6th day of November, 2014.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
United States Department of Transportation Tuesday, October 6, 2015 Docket Management System 1200 New Jersey Ave., SE West Building Ground Floor Room W12-140 Washington, DC 20590 Re: 333 MODIFICATION REQUEST - Add UAS Systems / Airframes to Existing Exemption Pursuant To Section 333 of the FAA Reform Act of 2012

Dear Sir Or Madam:
REDLine Aerospace LLC requests that five modern, off the shelf UAS systems are added to our approved list of operating UAS / aerial systems. Our approved 333 is EXEMPTION NO. 11825 REGULATORY DOCKET NO. FAA-2015-0373 The four rotary systems are similar in size and performance to our previously approved list of systems, and the 3DR fixed wing aircraft is a proven OTS system as well.

1. SAFETY OF FLIGHT - MODERNIZATION OF UAS SYSTEMS - Redline hereby requests the following systems to be added to our roster of UAS systems approved for commercial flight: 1.1. Rotary UAS (Quad / Hexi / Octo) 1.1.1. DJI - MATRICE 100 ( LINK TO DJI MANUAL ) 1.1.2. FreeFly Systems - ALTA ( LINK TO ALTA SPECS ) 1.1.3. 3DR - X8-M Copter ( LINK TO X8-M MANUFACTURER PAGE ) 1.1.4. Shotover - U1 sUAS ( LINK TO MANUFACTURER PAGE ) 1.2. Fixed Wing UAS (Electric) 1.2.1. 3DR - Aero-M Fixed Wing ( LINK TO MANUFACTURER PAGE )
Our flight safety program may modify aircraft to include parachute recovery systems or systems designed to improve flight safety as listed in our original 333 request. We will also add transponders as systems become available for small UAS such as these.
Questions or comments may be addressed to Christopher R. Vasquez, Redline Aerospace LLC

Christopher R Vasquez CEO, Chief Pilot - Redline Aerospace LLC www.RedlineAerospace.com chris@RLAero.com (831) 224-2778

of 1 1
EXHIBIT 4(r)
This instrument prepared by:
James P. Paul, Esq.
HALEY, SINAGRA & PEREZ, P. A.
100 South Biscayne Blvd., Suite 800
Miami, Florida 33131

                            SATISFACTION OF MORTGAGE
                            ------------------------

         KNOW  ALL MEN BY THESE  PRESENTS,  that  SELEX  INTERNATIONAL  B.V.,  a
company  organized under the laws of the Netherlands  (Mortgagee),  is the owner
and holder of a certain  mortgage  deed executed by THE DELTONA  CORPORATION,  a
Delaware   corporation,   999  Brickell  Avenue,  Suite  700,  Miami,  FL  33131
("Mortgagor"),  in favor of SELEX SITTARD B. V. n/k/a SELEX INTERNATIONAL, B. V.
a Netherlands  corporation,  dated June 15, 1992, securing a certain note in the
principal sum of  $3,000,000.00  Dollars,  and all promises and  obligations set
forth in said mortgage,  upon the property  described in said mortgage,  and any
further encumbrances,  as recorded June 18, 1992 in Official Records Book 945 at
Pages 1282 through 1302, of the Public Records of St. Johns County, Florida.

         HEREBY  ACKNOWLEDGES  full payment and  satisfaction  of said notes and
mortgage  deed, and surrender the same as cancelled and hereby directs the Clerk
of the said Court to cancel the same of record.

         Witness my hand and seal this 13 day of November, 1997.


                                                                          [Seal]

Signed, sealed and delivered
in the presence of:
                                       SELEX INTERNATIONAL B.V.,
                                       a company organized under the laws of the
                                       Netherlands
/s/ Sharon Hummerhielm
-----------------------------
Witness: Sharon Hummerhielm

/s/ Nancy Roche                        By: /s/ Rudy M. Gram
------------------------------            -------------------------------------
Witness: Nancy Roche                      RUDY M. GRAM, Attorney-In-Fact
                                          49 Shores Boulevard, St. Augustine
                                          Shores, FL 32086


STATE OF FLORIDA,
COUNTY OF DADE:

     The  foregoing  instrument  was  acknowledged  before  me this  13th day of
November, 1997, by RUDY M. GRAM,  Attorney-In-Fact for SELEX INTERNATIONAL B.V.,
a  company  organized  under  the  la s of the  Netherlands,  on  behalf  of the
corporation. He is personally known to me.


                                    /s/ Nancy Roche
                                    -------------------------------------------
                                                                  Notary Public