alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 343 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 343

 To prohibit arms transfers to certain countries unless the President 
 certifies that a state of war does not exist between such country and 
  Israel and that such country has accorded formal recognition to the 
                         sovereignty of Israel.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 5, 1993

 Mr. Schumer introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Foreign Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To prohibit arms transfers to certain countries unless the President 
 certifies that a state of war does not exist between such country and 
  Israel and that such country has accorded formal recognition to the 
                         sovereignty of Israel.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. RESTRICTION ON ARMS TRANSFERS TO CERTAIN COUNTRIES.

    (a) Restriction.--Except as provided in subsection (b)--
            (1) defense articles, defense services, and design and 
        construction services may not be sold or otherwise transferred 
        to any country listed in subsection (c) by the United States 
        Government under the Arms Export Control Act or the Foreign 
        Assistance Act of 1961; and
            (2) the President may not give his approval for the 
        transfer to any country listed in subsection (c) by another 
        foreign country of any defense articles or defense services 
        previously sold or otherwise transferred to that country by the 
        United States Government under either such Act.
    (b) Lifting of Restriction.--Subsection (a) shall cease to apply to 
a country listed in subsection (c) if the President certifies to the 
Congress that--
            (1) a state of war does not exist between that country and 
        Israel, and
            (2) that country has accorded formal recognition to the 
        sovereignty of Israel.
    (c) Countries Subject to Restriction.--Subsection (a) applies to 
the following countries: Bahrain, Yemen, Iran, Iraq, Jordan, Kuwait, 
Lebanon, Libya, Oman, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, Syria, and the United Arab 
Emirates.

                                 <all>
```
# C_2015098EN.01000601.xml

| 25.3.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 98/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.3.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 98/6

---

Commission notice pursuant to Article 16(4) of Regulation (EC) No 1008/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council on common rules for the operation of air services in the Community

Modification of public service obligations in respect of scheduled air services

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2015/C 98/06)

| Member State | Portugal |
| --- | --- |
| Route concerned | Ponta Delgada-Santa Maria-Ponta Delgada
  Ponta Delgada-Terceira-Ponta Delgada
  Ponta Delgada-Horta-Ponta Delgada
  Ponta Delgada-Pico-Ponta Delgada
  Ponta Delgada-São Jorge-Ponta Delgada
  Ponta Delgada-Flores-Ponta Delgada
  Terceira-Graciosa-Terceira
  Terceira-São Jorge-Terceira
  Terceira-Pico-Terceira
  Terceira-Horta-Terceira
  Terceira-Flores-Terceira
  Horta-Flores-Horta
  Horta-Corvo-Horta
  Corvo-Flores-Corvo |
| Original date of entry into force of the public service obligations | 1 June 2009 |
| Date of entry into force of modifications | 1 October 2015 |
| Address where the text and any relevant information and/or documentation relating to the public service obligation can be obtained | For further information please contact:





  Direção Regional dos Transportes, da Secretaria Regional do Turismo e Transportes |
| Largo do Colégio, n.o 4 |
| 9500-054 Ponta Delgada, Azores |
| PORTUGAL |
| Tel. +351 296206200 |
| Fax +351 296281112 |
| E-mail: drtransportes@azores.gov.pt |
| Internet: http://www.azores.gov.pt/Portal/pt/entidades/srtt-drt/ |

Member State

Portugal

Route concerned

Ponta Delgada-Santa Maria-Ponta Delgada

Ponta Delgada-Terceira-Ponta Delgada

Ponta Delgada-Horta-Ponta Delgada

Ponta Delgada-Pico-Ponta Delgada

Ponta Delgada-São Jorge-Ponta Delgada

Ponta Delgada-Flores-Ponta Delgada

Terceira-Graciosa-Terceira

Terceira-São Jorge-Terceira

Terceira-Pico-Terceira

Terceira-Horta-Terceira

Terceira-Flores-Terceira

Horta-Flores-Horta

Horta-Corvo-Horta

Corvo-Flores-Corvo

Original date of entry into force of the public service obligations

1 June 2009

Date of entry into force of modifications

1 October 2015

Address where the text and any relevant information and/or documentation relating to the public service obligation can be obtained

For further information please contact:

Direção Regional dos Transportes, da Secretaria Regional do Turismo e Transportes

Largo do Colégio, n.o 4

o

9500-054 Ponta Delgada, Azores

PORTUGAL

Tel. +351 296206200

Fax +351 296281112

E-mail: drtransportes@azores.gov.pt

Internet: http://www.azores.gov.pt/Portal/pt/entidades/srtt-drt/

---
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be

published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-40233 Summary Calendar

BROWN FREIGHT SYSTEMS, INC.,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

TEXACO, INC.,

Defendant-Appellee.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. B-99-CV-120

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

October 17, 2001

Before DAVIS, BENAVIDES and STEWART, Circuit Judges:

PER CURIAM: *

Brown Freight Systems, Inc., (BFS), appeals from the district co urt ’s decision granting

summary judgment to Texaco, Inc., in BFS’s discrimination claim brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. §

1981. Although BFS established that it was a minority-owned business, it failed to establish a prima

facie case of discrimination because there was no genuine issue of material fact whether the company

was qualified for an available contract with Texaco. S ee LaPierre v. Benson Nissan, Inc.

, 86 F.3d

444, 448 (5th Cir. 1 996). Accordingly, the district court did not err in granting Texaco summary

judgment on BFS’s § 1981 claim, and the court’s decision is AFFIRMED. S ee McDonnell-Douglas

Corp. v. Green , 411 U.S. 792, 801-02 (1973).
EXHIBIT 32.1





CERTIFICATION


Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350


(Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)





In connection with the Report on Form 10-Q of SUJA MINERALS, CORP. (the "Company") for the period ended April 30, 2013, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Matt Reams, as Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








Date: June 19, 2013








By: /s/ Matt ReamsMatt ReamsChief Executive OfficerChief Financial Officer











This certification accompanies each Report pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of ss.18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
T&E.a1e.baselines.and.benefits.Mon.Mar.21.2011.xls

Author: Abt Associates Inc. Created: 03/21/11 Worksheet Description

T&E_Losses Output of the T&E model showing species-specific reductions in I&E mortality of T&E species under regulatory options 1 through 4 Purpose: Output file of the T&E model which presents species-specific reductions in I&E mortality of T&E species under regulatory options 1 through 4

File Info 1 of 2species region region.ae1 option.1 option.2 option.3 option.4

paddlefish inland 17627.72 8630.605 15945.67 16317.39 8419.903 pallid.sturgeon

inland 87.83187 73.47893 84.89592 85.72126 71.68506 topeka.shiner

inland 3668.866 3069.323 3546.227 3580.703 2994.39

T&E_Losses 2 of 2
<PAGE>

                                 [LETTERHEAD]



September 12, 2000



Securities and Exchange Commission
450 Fifth Street, N.W.
Washington, DC 20549


Gentlemen:

We have read Item 4 of Form 8-K originally dated June 21, 2000 and as amended
on July 14, 2000, and September 12, 2000 of Equalnet Communications Corp. and
are in agreement with the statements contained in the first two paragraphs on
page 2 therein. We have no basis to agree or disagree with other statements
of the registrant contained therein.


                                       /s/ Ernst & Young LLP
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD 

KATHERINE L. FLEMING,

Appellant,

v.

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR,

Agency.

DOCKET NUMBER

AT-1221-11-0460-M-1

DATE: November 23, 2016

THIS ORDER IS NONPRECEDENTIAL*

Katherine L. Fleming, Homestead, Florida, pro se.

Vicki V. Mott, Esquire, Atlanta, Georgia, for the agency.

BEFORE

Susan Tsui Grundmann, Chairman

Mark A. Robbins, Member

REMAND ORDER

¶1 The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit remanded this case to the 

Board on August 30, 2016, granting the Board’s August 11, 2016 motion to 

intervene and for remand. Fleming v. Department of the Interior, No. 16-1247, 

 

* A nonprecedential order is one that the Board has determined does not add 

significantly to the body of MSPB case law. Parties may cite nonprecedential orders, 

but such orders have no precedential value; the Board and administrative judges are not 

required to follow or distinguish them in any future decisions. In contrast, a 

precedential decision issued as an Opinion and Order has been identified by the Board 

as significantly contributing to the Board’s case law. See 5 C.F.R. § 1201.117(c).
2

slip op. (Fed. Cir. Aug. 30. 2016). The Board’s reasons for requesting remand are 

set forth in its August 11, 2016 motion to the Court.

¶2 The Board hereby VACATES its September 22, 2015 Final Order in the 

underlying case, MSPB Docket No. AT-1221-11-0460-B-2. This case is 

REMANDED for further proceedings in accordance with the Court’s August 30, 

2016 order and the Board’s August 11, 2016 motion. On remand, the case shall 

be adjudicated by an MSPB administrative judge from the Board’s Office of 

Regional Operations.

FOR THE BOARD:

Washington, D.C.

______________________________

Jennifer Everling

Acting Clerk of the Board
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 12**  **- 8002** 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,
v. DANIELLE JERMAINE JACKSON, a/k/a Head , Defendant

- Appellant
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina , at Charlotte
. Frank D. Whitney , District Judge. ( 3:07

- cr - 00061

- FDW

- 17 ; 3:12

- cv - 00163

- FDW )

Submitted : April 25, 2013 Decided: April 29, 2013

Before AGEE and WYNN , Circuit Judges , and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge
.
Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion
.
Danielle Jermaine Jackson , Appellant Pro Se. Amy Elizabeth Ray, Assistant U nited S tates Attorney , Asheville, North Carolina, for Appellee
. Unpub lished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Danielle Jermaine Jackson seeks to appeal the district court’s order dismissing as untimely his 28 U.S.C. A. § 2255 (West Supp. 2012) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circ uit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (B) (2006) . A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006)
. When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or
wrong. Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 48 4 (2000); see Miller

El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336

- 38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a debatable c laim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack , 529 U.S. at 484

- 85. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Jackson has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal3 c ontentions are adequately presented in the materials before th is court and argum ent would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
#### Humberto and Antonia TRUEBA, Petitioners, v. Carmen BESOSA, Respondent.

No. 67-666.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Third District.

July 27, 1967.

Rehearing Denied Aug. 18, 1967.

PER CURIAM.

Certiorari dismissed.
Exhibit 32.1





Certification of Principal Executive Officer


Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to


Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of PinstripesNY, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Clifford Teller, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:





(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/ Clifford Teller_____

Clifford Teller

Principal Executive Officer

February 14, 2011
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3246 Engrossed in House (EH)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 3246

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
To amend title 39, United States Code, to make applicable with respect 
  to the United States Postal Service certain exclusionary authority 
  relating to the treatment of reemployed annuitants under the civil 
            service retirement laws, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF EXCLUSIONARY AUTHORITY.

    Section 1005(d) of title 39, United States Code, is amended--
            (1) by striking ``(d)'' and inserting ``(d)(1)''; and
            (2) by adding at the end the following:
    ``(2) The provisions of subsections (i) and (l)(2) of section 8344, 
and of subsections (f) and (i)(2) of section 8468, of title 5 shall 
apply with respect to the Postal Service. For purposes of so applying 
such provisions--
            ``(A) any reference in such provisions to the head of an 
        Executive agency shall be considered a reference to the 
        Postmaster General; and
            ``(B) any reference in such provisions to an employee shall 
        be considered a reference to an officer or employee of the 
        Postal Service.''.

SEC. 2. ASSIGNMENT AUTHORITY.

    Section 8706(e) of title 5, United States Code, is amended--
            (1) by striking ``Federal judge'' and inserting ``employee 
        or former employee'';
            (2) by striking ``judge's'' and inserting ``employee's or 
        former employee's''; and
            (3) by striking ``purchase'' and inserting ``purchased''.
            Passed the House of Representatives July 19, 1994.
            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
103d CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 3246

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

To amend title 39, United States Code, to make applicable with respect 
  to the United States Postal Service certain exclusionary authority 
  relating to the treatment of reemployed annuitants under the civil 
            service retirement laws, and for other purposes.
```
#### Willie E. SUMRALL v. CITY OF JACKSON.

No. 46976.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

Jan. 29, 1973.

Mason & Swindoll, Jackson, for appellant.

W. ."T. Neely, John E. Stone, Valentine Surgis, Jackson, for appellee.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Hinds County; Russel D. Moore, Judge.

Before GILLESPIE, C. J., and SMITH, SUGG, WALKER and BROOM, JJ.

Affirmed.
Phillip L. Kiddoo

Air Pollutron Control Ofhcer


# GnBEr BRsIN TINrnrnD 

# AIR 

# Porr,uTIoN 

# Coxrnor, DISTRICT 157 Short Street, Bishop, 

### California 9351,4-3537

760-872-8211. Fax: 760-872-6109 

### Ãprrl2l,2016

SENTVIA 

### E-MAIL: Carol.Sutkus@arb.ca.gov 

### Ms. Carol Sutkus Manager, South Coast

## Ail Quality Planning Section 

### Air Quality Planning and Science 

### Division 

### Air Resources Board 1001 

### I Street, P.O. 

### Box 2815 Sacramento, 

### CA95812 Re: 

### New Rule 

### 433: Control of Particulate Emissions at Owens Lake 

### (Adopted: 

### April 13,2016) Dear 

### Ms. Sutkus, The Governing 

### Board of the Great Basin 

### Unified 

### Air Pollution Control 

### District adopted Rule 433

## - Control 

### of Particulate Emissions at Owens Lake on

### April 13, 

### 2016. This rule is part 

### of a comprehensive SIP amendment 

### for the Owens

### Valley PMro Planning 

### Area Demonstration 

### of Attainment State 

### Implementation Plan. Enclosed isthe

### ARB SIP Completeness 

### Checklist along

### with the 

### required documents listed therein. Items being sent

### via e-mail includethe

### ARB Rule 

### Evaluation Form, rule analysis, the Governing Board resolution adopting the 

### rule, aclean copy 

### ofthe 

### rule, proofs of publication, astaff report, comment letters and responses, 

### modeling supporl and the 

### required CEQA document. 

### A copy 

### of the approved minutes 

### fol the 

### rule adoption hearing 

### will be sent 

### toyou after the 

### next Governing Board meeting.



### Air Pollution Control 

### Officer Enclosures Please 

### call me eany questions regarding Rule 433.
# WATER QUALITY CONTROL PLAN

FOR THE 

# SAN DIEGO BASIN (9)

SEPTEMBER 8, 1994

(with amendments effective on or before April 4, 2011)



## CALIFORNIA REGIONAL WATER QUALITY CONTROL BOARD

SAN DIEGO REGION

# WATER QUALITY CONTROL PLAN

FOR THE SAN DIEGO BASIN (9)

Adopted by the California Regional Water Quality Control Board San Diego Region on September 8, 1994

Approved by the

State Water Resources Control Board on December 13, 1994

and the

Office of Administrative Law on April 26, 1995

(with amendments effective on or before April 4, 2011)

Cover Design by Sharon Norton, State Water Resources Control Board

Cover Photographs clockwise from top left corner: San Diego Marine Life Refuge (2004) by D. Gregorio San Mateo Creek Steelhead (1999) by L. Pardy Kelp at La Jolla Shores (2006) by L. Pardy San Diego Bay by SWRCB Cold Creek Falls (1995) by J. Smith

September 8, 1994 edition prepared by David T. Barker, P.E., Senior Water Resource Control Engineer

Kristin K. Schwall P.E., Water Resources Control Engineer D Linda L. Pardy, Environmental Scientist

### STATE OF CALIFORNIA

EDMUND G. BROWN JR., Governor MATTHEW RODRIQUEZ, Agency Secretary, California Environmental Protection Agency

State Water Resources Control Board

Charles R. Hoppin, Chair Water Quality Frances Spivy-Weber, Vice Chair Public Tam M. Doduc Civil Engineer Steven Moore Sanitary Engineer

Felicia Marcus A ttorney

Thomas Howard, Executive Director

1001 I St., Sacramento, CA 95814
Phone (916) 341-5254 http://www.waterboards.ca.gov/

California Regional Water Quality Control Board San Diego Region

Grant Destache, Chair Gary Strawn, Vice Chair

Eric Anderson George Loveland Henry Abarbanel

Tomas Morales

Vacant

David W. Gibson, Executive Officer James G. Smith, Assistant Executive Officer

9174 Sky Park Court, Suite 100

San Diego, CA 92123-4340
Phone (858) 467-2952

Fax (858) 571-6972 http://www.waterboards.ca.gov/sandiego/
### Beverly Eaves Perdue Governor
Gwendolyn Keyes Fleming Regional Administrator USEPA , Region 4 Sam Nunn Federal Center 61 Forsyth Street, SW Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8960 

### Di re c tor July 30 , 2012 

### De e Fre eman Sec r etary

Subject: State Implementation Plan Revisions for Deferral of Carbon Dioxide Emissions from Bioenergy Sources from Prevention of Significant Deterioration Requirements for Greenhouse Gases Dear Ms
. Fleming: Please find enclosed North Carolina ' s submittal of its final permanent rule adopting the deferral of carbon dioxide (C0 2 ) emissions from bioenergy under the Prevention of Significant Deterioration (PSD) rule for greenhouse gases. On May 10 , 2012, the Environmental Management Commission (EMC) adopted permanent rule amendments to 15A NCAC 02D
.0544 Prevention of Significant Deterioration Requirements for Greenhouse Gases. This rule was the subject of a public hearing held on March 14, 2012 and was approved by the State Rules Review Commission at its June 20 , 2012 meeting. The rule became effective July 1 , 2012
. Enclosed is the hearing record for this public hearing and a copy of the rule for which approval is requested. The hard copy of the rule and hearing record is identical to the
.pdf file recorded on the CD. Please proceed to approve the aforementioned rule as part of the federally-approved State Implementation Plan. If you need additional information or have any questions regarding this submittal, please contact Ms. Joelle Burleson of my staff at (919)707-8720 or joelle
.burleson @ncdenr
.gov.

# ;;;**~** 

# 4

<

# ~·**~**
Enclosures SCH/jb
c: Nacosta Ward Lynorae Benjamin Sushma Masemore Hearing Record File

# ~~**Sheila** C. Holman

1641 Mail Service Cen ter, R aleigh , No rt h Ca r olina 27699-1641 217 W est Jones S treet, Raleigh , NC 27603 Pho ne: 919-707-840 1 I F A

X 919 -715-0718 I In terne t : www .ncair.org An Equal Opportuni t y / A

f firmative A ction Employer

# N~rthCarolina 

# )Vaturall!l