alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS Appeal of-- Lockheed Martin Corporation Under Contract Nos. FA8621-06-C-6300 F42630-99-C-0195 APPEARANCES FORTHE APPELLANT: ) ) ) ) ) )

APPEARANCES FORTHE GOVERNMENT: ASBCA No. 58987

Joseph P. Homyak, Esq. Gregory R. Hallmark, Esq.

Holland & Knight LLP Tysons Comer, VA E. Michael Chiaparas, Esq.

DCMA ChiefTrial Attorney Robert L. Duecaster, Esq.

Trial Attorney Defense Contract Management Agency Manassas, VA ORDER OF DISMISSAL The parties have requested that proceedings in this appeal be suspended pending resolution ofthe related appeal ofCAE USA, Inc., ASBCA No. 58957. A suspension of indeterminate duration such as that requested by the parties would preclude the Board from proceeding with the disposition ofthis appeal for an inordinate length oftime. Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed without prejudice pursuant to Board Rule 30. Eitherparty orthe Board may act to reinstate this appeal regardless ofthe status ofany related appeal. Unless eitherparty or the Board acts to reinstate the appeal within three years from the date ofthis Order, the dismissal shall be deemed with prejudice. Dated: 7 May 2014

Administrative Judge Vice Chairman Armed Services Board ofContract AppealsI certify that the foregoing is a true copy ofthe Order ofDismissal ofthe Armed Services Board ofContract Appeals in ASBCA No. 58987, Appeal ofLockheed Martin Corporation, rendered in conformance with the Board's Charter. Dated:

2 JEFFREYD. GARDIN Recorder, Armed Services Board ofContract Appeals
# C_2016407EN.01010401.xml

| 4.11.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 407/104 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.11.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 407/104

---

P8_TA(2015)0224

Accession of Croatia to the Convention on the fight against corruption involving EC officials or officials of Member States *

European Parliament legislative resolution of 10 June 2015 on the recommendation for a Council decision concerning the accession of Croatia to the Convention of 26 May 1997, drawn up on the basis of Article K.3(2)(c) of the Treaty on European Union, on the fight against corruption involving officials of the European Communities or officials of Member States of the European Union (COM(2014)0661 — C8-0274/2014 — 2014/0322(NLE))

(Consultation)

(2016/C 407/20)

The European Parliament,

The European Parliament

| — | having regard to the Commission recommendation to the Council (COM(2014)0661), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the Commission recommendation to the Council (COM(2014)0661),

| — | having regard to Article 3(4) and (5) of the Act of Accession of Croatia, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament (C8-0274/2014), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to Article 3(4) and (5) of the Act of Accession of Croatia, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament (C8-0274/2014),

| — | having regard to Rule 59 of its Rules of Procedure, |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to Rule 59 of its Rules of Procedure,

| — | having regard to the report of the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs (A8-0157/2015), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the report of the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs (A8-0157/2015),

| 1. | Approves the Commission recommendation; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Approves the Commission recommendation;

| 2. | Calls on the Council to notify Parliament if it intends to depart from the text approved by Parliament; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Calls on the Council to notify Parliament if it intends to depart from the text approved by Parliament;

| 3. | Asks the Council to consult Parliament again if it intends to substantially amend the text approved by Parliament; |
| --- | --- |

3.

Asks the Council to consult Parliament again if it intends to substantially amend the text approved by Parliament;

| 4. | Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council and to the Commission. |
| --- | --- |

4.

Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council and to the Commission.

---
#### Kirteen L. WOODS, Appellant, v. Earl BATTEY, George Lee Harris and Midway Company, a foreign corporation, Appellees.

No. 1133.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Fourth District.

Nov. 21, 1967.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3148 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3148

To extend the duty reduction on certain unwrought lead for a period of 
                               two years.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 28, 1993

 Mr. Emerson introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To extend the duty reduction on certain unwrought lead for a period of 
                               two years.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled, That subheading 
9902.78.01 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 
amended by striking out the date ``12/31/92'' from the effective date 
column and inserting in lieu thereof ``12/31/95''.

                                 <all>
```
#### STATE of Louisiana ex rel. Willie VALENTINE v. C. Murray HENDERSON, Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary.

No. 53898.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Sept. 26, 1973.

In re: Willie Valentine applying for writ of habeas corpus.

Writ denied. Transcript of evidentiary hearing refutes allegation of incompetent counsel. Identification issue disposed of in State v. Valentine, 262 La. 571, 263 So.2d 893.
<PAGE>

                                                                   Exhibit 23.12

                        REPORT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

To the Board of Directors and Shareholders

In our opinion, the accompanying combined balance sheet and the related combined
statements of operations, of changes in shareholders' equity and of cash flows
present fairly, in all material respects, the combined financial position of
Access Self-Storage Holdings S.A., Akeler Holdings S.A., B.C. Holdings S.A., and
CWE Property Holdings S.A. and their subsidiaries at 31 December 2001, and the
results of their operations and their cash flows for the year ended 31 December
2001 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United
States of America. These financial statements are the responsibility of the
Board of Directors of each Company; our responsibility is to express an opinion
on these financial statements based on our audit. We conducted our audit of
these statements in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the
United States of America, which require that we plan and perform the audit to
obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of
material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence
supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing
the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, and
evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our
audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

PricewaterhouseCoopers
London
21 March 2002
# C_2019292DE.01000801.xml

| 30.8.2019 | DE | Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union | C 292/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.8.2019

DE

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union

C 292/8

---

Berichtigung des Ethik-Rahmens der EZB

(
  Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union C 204 vom 20. Juni 2015
  )

(2019/C 292/07)

Seite 8, Artikel 0.2.7.:

Anstatt:

„Unselbstständige Tätigkeit eines Ehegatten oder anerkannten Lebenspartners

Die Mitarbeiter sind verpflichtet, die Stabsstelle für Compliance und Governance über unselbstständige Tätigkeiten ihres Ehegatten oder anerkannten Lebenspartners zu informieren, die zu einem Interessenkonflikt führen könnten. Sollte sich herausstellen, dass die Art der beruflichen Tätigkeit zu einem Interessenkonflikt mit den Dienstpflichten des Mitarbeiters führt, informiert die Stabsstelle für Compliance und Governance zunächst den zuständigen direkten Vorgesetzten und berät ihn über angemessene Maßnahmen, die zur Milderung des Interessenkonflikts eingeleitet werden sollten, einschließlich, falls erforderlich, der Entbindung des Mitarbeiters von der Verantwortung für die betreffende Angelegenheit.“

muss es heißen:

muss es heißen:

„Erwerbstätigkeit eines Ehegatten oder anerkannten Lebenspartners

Die Mitarbeiter sind verpflichtet, die Stabsstelle für Compliance und Governance über jede Erwerbstätigkeit ihres Ehegatten oder anerkannten Lebenspartners zu informieren, die zu einem Interessenkonflikt führen könnte. Sollte sich herausstellen, dass die Art der Tätigkeit zu einem Interessenkonflikt mit den Dienstpflichten des Mitarbeiters führt, informiert die Stabsstelle für Compliance und Governance zunächst den zuständigen direkten Vorgesetzten und berät ihn über angemessene Maßnahmen, die zur Milderung des Interessenkonflikts eingeleitet werden sollten, einschließlich, falls erforderlich, der Entbindung des Mitarbeiters von der Verantwortung für die betreffende Angelegenheit.“

---
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 3224

To direct the Forest Service to replace the Modular Airborne Fire Fighting

System, and for other purposes.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

OCTOBER 6, 1993

Mr. GALLEGLY introduced the following bill; which was referred jointly to the

Committees on Natural Resources and Agriculture

A BILL

To direct the Forest Service to replace the Modular Airborne

Fire Fighting System, and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. REPLACEMENT OF MODULAR AIRBORNE FIRE

4 FIGHTING SYSTEM.

5 The Secretary of Agriculture, acting through the

6 Chief of the Forest Service, shall acquire, with funds made

7 available under section 2, 12 units to replace the Modular

8 Airborne Fire Fighting System. Each unit shall—
2

•HR 3224 IH

1 (1) be designed for roll-on, roll-off use with C–

2 130 aircraft without modification of the aircraft;

3 and

4 (2) meet the criteria established by the Inter5 agency Airtanker Board for airtankers used by the

6 Forest Service to fight forest fires.

7 SEC. 2. SALE OF HELIUM RESERVE TO PAY FOR ACQUISI8 TION OF MODULAR AIRBORNE FIRE FIGHT9 ING SYSTEM.

10 (a) REPEAL.—The Helium Act (50 U.S.C. 161 et

11 seq.) is repealed.

12 (b) SALE OF PROPERTY.—The Secretary of the Inte13 rior shall sell or otherwise dispose of, at the best possible

14 terms available to the United States, all facilities, equip15 ment, and other real or personal property, or rights there16 to, held by the United States in connection with activities

17 carried out under the Helium Act, unless such facilities,

18 equipment, or other real or personal property, or rights

19 thereto, are required for other Federal purposes.

20 (c) SALE OF HELIUM RESERVE.—The Secretary of

21 the Interior shall sell or otherwise dispose of, at the best

22 possible terms available to the United States, all helium

23 reserves held by the United States other than amounts

24 required for the specific immediate needs of the Federal

25 Government. Such sale shall be conducted in a manner
3

•HR 3224 IH

1 consistent with the orderly conduct of commercial helium

2 markets.

3 (d) USE OF PROCEEDS FROM SALES.—All funds re4 ceived pursuant to subsections (b) and (c), and all

5 amounts remaining in the helium production fund estab6 lished under section 6(f) of the Helium Act, shall be con7 sidered full repayment of loans made under section 12 of

8 the Helium Act. Such funds shall be transferred to the

9 Secretary of Agriculture for the acquisition of the units

10 to replace the Modular Airborne Fire Fighting System

11 under section 1. Any funds not used for such acquisition

12 shall be applied solely to the retirement of outstanding

13 United States Government debt, and may not be obligated

14 or expended for any other purpose, notwithstanding any

15 other provision of law that does not specifically reference

16 this section.

Æ
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 23.1

                          Consent of Ernst & Young LLP

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form
S-3 No. 333-24135) pertaining to the Palm Harbor Homes, Inc. Employee Savings
Plan, and in the Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-52535) and in the
related Prospectus of Palm Harbor Homes, Inc. and subsidiaries, of our report
dated May 9, 2003, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of Palm
Harbor Homes, Inc. and subsidiaries included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K)
for the year ended March 28, 2003.

June 4, 2003
Dallas, Texas
#### STATE of Louisiana ex rel. Arthur GUILLORY v. Frank BLACKBURN, Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary and 27th Judicial District Court, Parish of St. Landry.

No. 61868.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 7, 1978.

In re: Arthur Guillory applying for writ of habeas corpus. Parish of St. Landry.

Denied.
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3371 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3371

   To authorize Federal departments and agencies to sell energy from 
            cogeneration facilities, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 26, 1993

  Mr. Swett introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                    Committee on Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To authorize Federal departments and agencies to sell energy from 
            cogeneration facilities, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Federal Cogeneration Act of 1993''.

SEC. 2. PURPOSES.

    The purposes of this Act are--
            (1) to improve the energy efficiency of the Federal 
        Government, and reduce energy costs to the Federal Government;
            (2) to encourage Federal agencies to make energy-saving 
        investments that make the most efficient use of facilities and 
        resources of the Federal Government;
            (3) to encourage the Federal Government to set an example 
        in energy efficiency for States, industry, and the general 
        public; and
            (4) to foster greater cooperation between the Federal 
        Government and private industry in the effort to improve energy 
        efficiency of Federal facilities.

SEC. 3. COGENERATION AT FEDERAL FACILITIES.

    (a) In General.--Any Federal department or agency which uses steam 
or other forms of energy for heating, cooling or manufacturing or 
processing operations carried out by such department or agency is 
authorized to enter into contracts for the provision and operation of 
cogeneration facilities on real property under that department or 
agency's jurisdiction or on private property and for the purchase of 
such steam and other forms of energy from such facilities. Such 
contract may authorize the owner or operator of such cogeneration 
facilities to sell electric energy generated by such cogeneration 
facilities to any public or private electric utility company pursuant 
to agreements voluntarily entered into by such owner or operator and 
such electric utility company.
    (b) Military Installations.--Nothing in subsection (a) shall be 
construed to impair or otherwise affect the authority of the Secretary 
of a military department with respect to energy production under 
section 2394 of title 10.

                                 <all>
```
#### In the Interest of Bill SHAW.

No. 47905.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

March 11, 1974.

J. Terry Peeples, Coffeeville, for appellant.

A. F. Summer, Atty. Gen. by Billy L. Gore, Sp. • Asst. Atty. Gen., Jackson, for appellee.

Before GILLESPIE, C. J., and PATTERSON, SMITH, ROBERTSON and SUGG, JJ.

Affirmed.
## SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK 

## Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

**148 KA 12-00168** 
PRESENT: SMITH, J.P., FAHEY, CARNI, VALENTINO, AND WHALEN, JJ.

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT,

V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

RAYMONE T. BURTS, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

THE LEGAL AID BUREAU OF BUFFALO, INC., BUFFALO (ROBERT L. KEMP OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

FRANK A. SEDITA, III, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, BUFFALO (ASHLEY R. SMALL OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT.

Appeal from a judgment of the Erie County Court (Michael F. Pietruszka, J.), rendered October 24, 2011. The judgment convicted defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of robbery in the second degree and attempted robbery in the first degree.

It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed.

Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him, upon his plea of guilty, of robbery in the second degree (Penal Law § 160.10 [1]) and attempted robbery in the first degree (§§ 110.00, 160.15 [2]). Contrary to defendant’s contention, we conclude that he knowingly, intelligently, and voluntarily waived his right to appeal as a condition of the plea ( see generally People v Lopez , 6 NY3d 248, 256). County Court “ ‘engage[d] the defendant in an adequate colloquy to ensure that the waiver of the right to appeal was a knowing and voluntary choice’ ” ( People v Flagg , 107 AD3d 1613, 1614), and the record establishes that defendant “ ‘understood that the right to appeal is separate and distinct from those rights automatically forfeited upon a plea of guilty’ ” ( id. , quoting Lopez , 6 NY3d at 256). Defendant’s valid waiver forecloses our review of his contention concerning his purported motion ( see generally People v Callahan
, 80 NY2d 273, 285).

Entered: February 14, 2014 Frances E. Cafarell Clerk of the Court
H. R. 3197

One Hundred Third Congress

of the

United States of America

AT THE SECOND SESSION

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,

the twenty-fifth day of January, one thousand nine hundred and ninety-four

An Act

To redesignate the postal facility located at 2100 North 13th Street in Reading,

Pennsylvania, as the ‘‘Gus Yatron Postal Facility’’.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REDESIGNATION.

The postal facility located at 2100 North 13th Street in Reading,

Pennsylvania, and known as the Reading General Mail Facility,

shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Gus Yatron Postal Facility’’.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper,

or other record of the United States to the postal facility referred

to in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the Gus

Yatron Postal Facility.

Speaker of the House of Representatives.

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
#### Paul LOVETTE, Jr., Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 67-159.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Third District.

Aug. 7, 1967.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed.
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

October 14, 2005 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice 126121 & (51) Michael F. Cavanagh
Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan Robert P. Young, Jr. NATIONAL WINE & SPIRITS, INC., Stephen J. Markman, NWS MICHIGAN, INC., and Justices NATIONAL WINE & SPIRITS, L.L.C., Plaintiffs-Appellants,

v SC: 126121 COA: 243524 Ingham CC: 02-000013-CZ STATE OF MICHIGAN, Defendant-Appellee,

and

MICHIGAN BEER & WINE WHOLESALERS AS SOCIATION, Intervening Defenda nt-Appellee.

________________ _______________ __________/

By order of December 27, 20 04, the application for leav e to appeal was held in abeyance pending the decision in Granholm v Heald , 541 US 1062; 124 S Ct 2389; 158 L Ed 2d 962 (2004). On order of the Court, the opinion having been issued on May 16, 2005, Granholm v Heald , 544 US ; 125 S Ct 1885; 161 L Ed 2d 796 (2005), the application for leave to appeal the March 25, 2004 judgment of the Court of Appeals is again considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.302(G)(1), we direct the Clerk to schedule oral argument on whether to grant the application or take ot her peremptory action permitted by MCR 7.302(G)(1). The parties may file supplemental briefs within 28 days of the date of this order, but they should avoid submitting a mere restatement of the arguments made in their application papers. The motion to strike is DENIED as moot.

s1010 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

October 14, 2005

Clerk
# C_2013113EN.01000102.xml

| 20.4.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 113/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.4.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 113/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.6878 — Alior Bank/Erste Group Bank/Polbita)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2013/C 113/02

On 16 April 2013, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32013M6878. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32013M6878. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.

---
Exhibit 23.1


                         Consent of Ernst & Young, LLP
                    Independent Certified Public Accountants

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
(forms S-3 No. 33-47060, 33-47610, 33-61204, 33-78296 and 33-84554) of Hydron
Technologies, Inc. and in the related Prospectus of our report dated February
21, 1996, with respect to the financial statements of Hydron Technologies, Inc.
included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 1995.


/s/ Ernst & Young, LLP


West Palm Beach, Florida
March 27, 1996