alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                   EXHIBIT 11


              INTERNATIONAL MULTIFOODS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

                 Computation of Earnings (Loss) per Common Share
                                   (unaudited)

                    (in thousands, except per share amounts)



<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                      THREE MONTHS ENDED       SIX MONTHS ENDED
                                     --------------------     ------------------
                                     Aug. 26,    Aug. 31,     Aug. 26,   Aug. 31,
                                        2000        1999         2000       1999
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S>                                   <C>         <C>          <C>        <C>
Average shares of
   common stock outstanding           18,740      18,749       18,738     18,752
Dilutive potential common shares         144          99           83         95
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total adjusted average shares         18,884      18,848       18,821     18,847
================================================================================

Earnings from continuing operations   $5,279     $ 5,091      $10,029    $ 9,653
Loss from discontinued operations          -     (11,760)           -    (19,560)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Net earnings (loss) applicable
   to common stock                    $5,279     $(6,669)     $10,029    $(9,907)
================================================================================

Basic earnings (loss) per share:
   Continuing operations              $  .28     $   .27      $   .54    $   .51
   Discontinued operations                 -        (.63)           -      (1.04)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
     Total                            $  .28     $  (.36)     $   .54    $  (.53)
================================================================================

Diluted earnings (loss) per share:
   Continuing operations              $  .28     $   .27      $   .53    $   .51
   Discontinued operations                 -        (.62)           -      (1.04)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
     Total                            $  .28     $  (.35)     $   .53    $  (.53)
================================================================================
</TABLE>



Basic earnings (loss) per share are computed by dividing net earnings (loss) by
the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding during the
period.

Diluted earnings per share are computed similar to basic earnings per share
except that the weighted average shares outstanding are increased to include
additional shares from the assumed exercise of stock options, if dilutive. The
number of additional shares is calculated by assuming that outstanding stock
options were exercised and the proceeds from such exercises were used to acquire
shares of common stock at the average market price during the period.
Exhibit 31.2
 CERTIFICATIONS
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Imperial Holdings, Inc.;
 2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;
 3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;
 4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
    5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
   /s/ Richard S. OConnell, Jr.
Richard S. OConnell, Jr.Chief Financial Officer(Principal Financial Officer)May 13, 2011
 55
#### SOUTHERN STAR LAND COMPANY, a Florida corporation, Appellant, v. Alice Augusta DUPONT, as Executrix of the Estate of Katie C. Tongue, Deceased, Appellee.

No. 74-128.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

March 13, 1974.

Appeal dismissed.
# C_2015257EN.01001201.xml

| 6.8.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 257/12 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.8.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 257/12

---

WITHDRAWAL OF COMMISSION PROPOSALS

(2015/C 257/10)

List of withdrawn proposals

List of withdrawn proposals

| Document | Inter-institutional procedure | Title |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Internal Market, Industry, Entrepreneurship and SMEs |
| COM(2014) 0344 | 2014/0176/COD | Proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on the dissemination of Earth observation satellite data for commercial purposes |
| Justice, Consumers and Gender Equality |
| COM(2008) 0637 | 2008/0193/COD | Proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Council Directive 92/85/EEC on the introduction of measures to encourage improvements in the safety and health at work of pregnant workers and workers who have recently given birth or are breastfeeding |

Document

Inter-institutional procedure

Title

Internal Market, Industry, Entrepreneurship and SMEs

Internal Market, Industry, Entrepreneurship and SMEs

COM(2014) 0344

2014/0176/COD

Proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on the dissemination of Earth observation satellite data for commercial purposes

Justice, Consumers and Gender Equality

Justice, Consumers and Gender Equality

COM(2008) 0637

2008/0193/COD

Proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Council Directive 92/85/EEC on the introduction of measures to encourage improvements in the safety and health at work of pregnant workers and workers who have recently given birth or are breastfeeding

---
2013.12.31 EX 10.14






EXHIBIT 10.14
AMENDMENT TO THE FREESCALE HOLDINGS
2006 MANAGEMENT INCENTIVE PLAN
This Amendment to the Freescale Holdings 2006 Management Incentive Plan (the “Incentive Plan”) is made as of February 4, 2009 (the “Effective Date”). Capitalized terms used but not defined herein shall have the meanings ascribed to them in the Incentive Plan.
WHEREAS, Section 10 of the Incentive Plan provides in relevant part that the Board of Directors of Freescale Semiconductor Holdings I, Ltd. (the “Company”) may amend the Incentive Plan at any time;
WHEREAS, the Incentive Plan currently provides that a maximum of 15,610,400.44 shares of Common Stock may be delivered in satisfaction of Awards granted under the Incentive Plan shall be; and
WHEREAS, the Company wishes to amend the Incentive Plan to provide that up to 60,478,971 shares of Common Stock may be delivered in satisfaction of Awards granted under the Incentive Plan.
NOW THEREFORE, the Incentive Plan is hereby amended as follows:
 
	
		
	1.
	The first sentence of Section 4(a) of the Incentive Plan is hereby amended in its entirety to read as follows:

	 
	 

	 
	A maximum of 60,478,971 shares of Common Stock of the Company may be delivered in satisfaction of Awards under the Plan.


	 
	 

	2.
	Except as provided herein, the Incentive Plan shall remain in full force and effect.






[SIGNATURE PAGE FOLLOWS]





































































IN WITNESS WHEREOF, an authorized signatory of the Company has executed this Amendment, to be effective as of the Effective Date.
 
	
			
	FREESCALE SEMICONDUCTOR HOLDINGS I, LTD.

	 

	/s/ Michel Cadieux

	By:
	 
	Michel Cadieux

	Title:
	 
	Senior Vice President, Human Resources
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3308 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3308

To amend title 38, United States Code, to provide housing benefits for 
        the purchase of residential cooperative apartment units.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 19, 1993

 Mrs. Maloney introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                     Committee on Veterans' Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend title 38, United States Code, to provide housing benefits for 
        the purchase of residential cooperative apartment units.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. RESIDENTIAL COOPERATIVE HOUSING UNITS.

    (a) Loans.--Section 3710(a) of title 38, United States Code, is 
amended by adding at the end the following:
            ``(10) To purchase residential property in a development, 
        project, or structure of a cooperative housing corporation if 
        the development, project, or structure is approved by the 
        Secretary under criteria which the Secretary shall prescribe by 
        regulations.''.
    (b) Definition.--Section 3701(b) of such title is amended by adding 
at the end thereof the following:
            ``(6)(A) The term `residential property' includes stock or 
        membership in a cooperative housing corporation (as defined in 
        section 216 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986) the permanent 
        occupancy of the dwelling units of which is restricted to 
        members of such corporation where the purchase of such stock or 
        membership will entitle the purchaser to the permanent 
        occupancy of one of such units.
            ``(B) For the purposes of subparagraph (A)--
                    ``(i) the term `cooperative housing corporation' 
                has the same meaning given such term by section 216 of 
                the Internal Revenue Code of 1986;
                    ``(ii) the term `property' includes the dwelling 
                unit in such a cooperative; and
                    ``(iii) the term `value of the property' includes 
                the appraised value of the dwelling unit in the 
                cooperative housing corporation.''.

                                 <all>
```
#### Louis A. FABRE v. The TRAVELERS INSURANCE COMPANY and/or the Travelers Indemnity Co., et al.

No. 54315.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Feb. 1, 1974.

In re: Louis A. Fabre applying for certiorari or writ of review to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, Parish of East Baton Rouge. 286 So.2d 459.

Writ denied. The result is correct.
Exhibit-32.1 -- Certification per Sarbanes-Oxley Act (Section 906)

 

I am the Chief Executive and Financial Officer of AcroBoo, Inc.,a Nevada corporation (the "Company"). I am delivering this certificate in connection with the Form 10-Q of the Companyfor the quarter ended June 30, 2011 and filed with the U. S. Securities and Exchange Commission ("Form 10-Q").

 

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I hereby certify that, to the best of my knowledge, the Form 10-Q fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in theForm 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 

Dated: August 22, 2011

 

/s/ Dan Furlong

Dan Furlong

Principal Executive Officer

Principal Financial Officer
#### Melvin E. HIRTH and Dorothy B. Hirth, Petitioners, v. Ella Wright WILFORK et al., Respondents.

No. 42205.

Supreme Court of Florida.

April 25, 1972.

Rehearing Denied June 2, 1972.

Certiorari denied. 257 So.2d 920.

ROBERTS, C. J., and ERVIN, CARLTON and ADKINS, JJ., concur.

BOYD and McCAIN, JJ., dissent.
1 In The 

### Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

________________ NO. 09
- 13
- 00298
- CV

________________ IN THE INTEREST OF T.H.

__________________________________________________________________ On Appeal from the 317th District Court Jefferson County, Texas Trial Cause No. C
- 216 , 393

__________________________________________________________________ MEMORANDUM OPINION Appellant D.M. , the father of the minor child T.H. , appeals the trial court’s final order in a suit affecting the parent

- child relationship. We affirm the trial court’s order. The Department of Family and Protective Services (“the Department”) filed an original petition for protection of a child, for conservators hip, and for termination in a suit affecting the parent

- child relationship. After conducting an evidentiary hearing , the trial court did not terminate D.M.’s parental rights, but instead appointed T.H.’s maternal grandparents permanent managing conservator s2 of T.H. and appointed D.M. possessory conservator. The trial court’s order provided that D.M. would have access to T.H. unless he should appear to be under the influence ; gave the managing conservators the right to supervise D.M.’s visits and to require D.M. to submit to a drug test ; and prohibited D.M. from having overnight or unsupervised visits with T.H. D.M.’s appointed counsel submitted a brief in which he concludes that there are no arguable grounds to be advanced on appeal. The brief provides coun sel’s professional evaluation of the record, and counsel notified D.M. that he found no meritorious issues for appeal , provided a copy of the record to D.M., and notified D.M. of his right to file a pro se brief. Beca use this proceeding began as one in whi ch the Department sought termination of parental rights, this Court accepted the Anders brief filed by appointed counsel

. See High v. State , 573 S.W.2d 807 (Tex. Crim. App. 1978); see generally Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967); In the Interest of L.D.T. , 161 S.W.3d 728, 731 (Tex. App.

— Beaumont 2005, no pet.) (applying Anders procedure in an appeal from termination of parental rights)

. This Court also notified appellant of his right to file a pro se response, as well as the deadline for filing it. W e received no response from D.M. After reviewing the clerk’s record, the reporter’s record, and counsel’s brief, we agree with counsel’s conclusion that there are no plausible grounds for appeal.3 We find no arguable error requiring us to order appointment of new counsel to re

brief this appeal. Compare Stafford v. State , 813 S.W.2d 503, 511 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991). We affirm the trial court’s order appointing D.M. possessory conservator of the minor child T.H. and grant appellate counsel’s motion to withdraw.
AFFIRMED.

______________________________ STEVE McKEITHEN Chief Justice

Submitt ed on November 5, 2013 Opinion Delivered November 21, 2013 Before McKeithen, C.J., Kreger and Horton , JJ.
# C_2015413EN.01001101.xml

| 12.12.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 413/11 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.12.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 413/11

---

Notice concerning the definitive anti-dumping and countervailing duties imposed on imports of crystalline silicon photovoltaic modules and key components (i.e. cells) originating in or consigned from the People’s Republic of China: change of name of one company subject to an undertaking

(2015/C 413/09)

The undertaking offered in the framework of an anti-dumping and an anti-subsidy proceeding concerning imports of crystalline silicon photovoltaic modules and key components (i.e. cells) originating in or consigned from the People’s Republic of China was accepted by Commission Implementing Decision 2013/707/EU (1).

1

Era Solar Co. Ltd, TARIC additional code B818, whose undertaking was accepted by Implementing Decision 2013/707/EU, has notified the Commission of its change of name to Zhejiang Era Solar Technology Co., Ltd

The company argued that its change of name does not affect its right to continue to benefit from the individual duty rates previously applied to Era Solar Co. Ltd

The Commission has examined the information supplied and concluded that the change of name in no way affects the findings of Implementing Decision 2013/707/EU.

Therefore, the reference in Annex of Implementing Decision 2013/707/EU to:

| Era Solar Co. Ltd | B818 |
| --- | --- |

Era Solar Co. Ltd

B818

should be read as:

| Zhejiang Era Solar Technology Co., Ltd | B818 |
| --- | --- |

Zhejiang Era Solar Technology Co., Ltd

B818

The TARIC additional code B818, previously attributed to Era Solar Co. Ltd shall apply to Zhejiang Era Solar Technology Co., Ltd

---

(1)  OJ L 325, 5.12.2013, p. 214.

1

---
MEMORANDUM

SUBJECT: Forest Road Stormwater Discharges

FROM: Prasad Chumble

Rural Branch

Water Permits Division, 4203M

TO: The File

DATE: 5/26/16

EPA met with WildEarth Guardians on 2/24/16, to discuss the potential of the regulation of stormwater 

discharges from forest roads under section 402(p)(6) of the Clean Water Act (CWA). WildEarth 

Guardians stressed that numerable logging roads are not inventoried and that some states in the Pacific 

Northwest have more environmentally stringent forest road related programs than others. WildEarth 

Guardians also submitted the following document:

Road_Risk Factors to Aquatic Resources_PNW Travel Analysis_USFS_April_2015
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Medora Corp.(the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended January 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date here of (the "report"), I, Craig McKenzie, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) 	The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) 	The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated this 28th day of April, 2011.



| | CRAIG MCKENZIE                                     
| | ---------------------------------------------------
| | Craig McKenzie,                                    
| | Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer





















A signed original of these written statements required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Medora Corp. and will be retained by Medora Corp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



---
<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT 21.1

SUBSIDIARIES OF REGISTRANT

The following is a list of the Corporation's subsidiaries as of June 30, 2000.
The Corporation owns, directly or indirectly, 100% of the voting securities of
each subsidiary, unless noted otherwise.

NAME                                                 STATE OR JURISDICTION
                                                         OF ORGANIZATION

Parlex Dynaflex Corporation                                   California

Parlex International Corporation                              Virgin Islands

Parlex Acquisition Corporation                                Rhode Island

Parlex (Shanghai) Circuit Co., LTD.*                          Shanghai

Parlex Asia Pacific LTD.                                      Hong Kong

----------
*    50.1% owned by Parlex Corporation
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 3672

To require the Secretary of Labor to establish cost-of-living indexes on a

regional basis.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

NOVEMBER 22, 1993

Mr. NADLER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Education and Labor

A BILL

To require the Secretary of Labor to establish cost-of-living

indexes on a regional basis.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. REGIONAL COST-OF-LIVING INDEXES.

4 (a) GENERAL RULE.—Not later than the date 1 year

5 after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary

6 of Labor shall—

7 (1) establish a system for determining cost-of8 living indexes separately for—

9 (A) each statistical area in the United

10 States, and
2

•HR 3672 IH

1 (B) each congressional district, and

2 (2) determine and publish the initial cost-of-liv3 ing index for each such area and district.

4 (b) METHODOLOGY.—The cost-of-living index deter5 mined under subsection (a) for any statistical area or con6 gressional district for any calendar year shall be based on

7 the average market prices for the area or district for the

8 12-month period ending on August 31 of such calendar

9 year. The market prices taken into account under the pre10 ceding sentence shall be selected and used under the same

11 methodology as is used by the Secretary of Labor in devel12 oping the Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers.

13 (c) STATISTICAL AREA.—For purposes of this sec14 tion, the term ‘‘statistical area’’ means—

15 (1) any metropolitan statistical area as defined

16 by the Secretary of Commerce, and

17 (2) the portion of any State not within a metro18 politan statistical area as so defined.

19 (d) CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICT.—For purposes of

20 this section, the term ‘‘congressional district’’ includes—

21 (1) any State represented by a Representative

22 at Large;

23 (2) the District of Columbia; and

24 (3) any possession of the United States.
3

•HR 3672 IH

1 (e) TREATMENT OF POSSESSIONS.—For purposes of

2 this section, the terms ‘‘United States’’ and ‘‘State’’ in3 clude any possession of the United States.

4 (f) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.—There

5 are authorized to be appropriated $1,000,000 to carry out

6 the purposes of this section.

Æ
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3516 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 3516

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

             March 23 (legislative day, February 22), 1994

   Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and 
                           Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
To increase the amount authorized to be appropriated for assistance for 
 highway relocation regarding the Chickamauga and Chattanooga National 
                       Military Park in Georgia.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. INCREASE IN AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.

    Section 1(c) of the Act entitled ``An Act to authorize and direct 
the National Park Service to assist the State of Georgia in relocating 
a highway affecting the Chickamauga and Chattanooga National Military 
Park in Georgia'', approved December 24, 1987 (101 Stat. 1442), is 
amended by striking ``$30,000,000'' and inserting ``$45,000,000''.

            Passed the House of Representatives March 21, 1994.

            Attest:

                                           DONNALD K. ANDERSON,

                                                                 Clerk.
```