alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 3502

To designate the long-term care facility of the Department of Veterans Affairs

medical center at Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, as the Matthew B. Ridgway

Division of the Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center at University Drive, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

NOVEMBER 10, 1993

Mr. SANTORUM (for himself, Mr. COYNE, Mr. MCDADE, Mr. MURTHA, Mr.

WELDON, Mr. KLINK, Mr. RIDGE, Mr. MURPHY, Mr. CLINGER, Mr. KANJORSKI, Mr. SHUSTER, Mr. FOGLIETTA, Mr. GOODLING, Mr. BORSKI,

Mr. WALKER, Mr. MCHALE, Mr. GREENWOOD, Ms. MARGOLIESMEZVINSKY, Mr. BLACKWELL, Mr. HOLDEN, and Mr. GEKAS) introduced

the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Veterans’

Affairs

A BILL

To designate the long-term care facility of the Department

of Veterans Affairs medical center at Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, as the Matthew B. Ridgway Division of the

Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center at University Drive, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. NAMING.

4 The division of the Department of Veterans Affairs

5 medical center at University Drive in Pittsburgh, Penn-
2

•HR 3502 IH

1 sylvania, constituting the Aspinwall long-term care facility

2 shall after the date of the enactment of this Act be known

3 and designated as the Mathew B. Ridgway Division of the

4 Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center at Univer5 sity Drive, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.

6 SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

7 Any reference to the facility referred to in section 1

8 in any law, regulation, map, document, record, or other

9 paper of the United States shall be considered to be a ref10 erence to the Mathew B. Ridgway Division of the Depart11 ment of Veterans Affairs Medical Center at University

12 Drive, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.

Æ
Exhibit
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO




18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE


SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Brooklyn Cheesecake & Desserts
Company, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2009,
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
“Report”), I, Anthony J. Merante, President, Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:





(i)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section
      15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
  and





(ii)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.





Date:
August 14, 2009


/s/ Anthony J. MeranteAnthony
      J. MerantePresident,
      Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
  Officer
#### Mary A. Silvey, Plaintiff in Error, *vs.*Alphonso Sumner, Defendant in Error.

*Practice,civil*— Supreme *Court*— Judgment—Writ *of Error.*— Where the record shows no judgment of the court below, a writ of error will he dismissed.

*Error to Morgan Circuit Court.*

*J. A.*Spurlock, for Plaintiff in Error.

*A. W.*Anthony, for Defendant in Error.

Ewing, Judge,

delivered the opinion of the court.

No judgment of the Circuit Court appears in the record.

The writ of'error is therefore dismissed.

The other Judges concur.
250 La. 538

#### Claude Daniel McCULLIN v. STATE of Louisiana (Through Department of Highways).

No. 48647.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 14, 1967.

In re: State of Louisiana, through its Department of Highways applying for writs of certiorari, mandamus and prohibition.

Writ refused. The showing made does not warrant the exercise of our supervisory jurisdiction.
#### Bobby Allen BRYANT, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 72-20.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Nov. 7, 1972.

James R. Pierce, Director, Legal Aid Clinic, Gainesville, and Lawrence Rolfe, Legal Intern, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., and William L. Rogers and Arnold R. Ginsberg, Asst. Attys. Gen., for appellee.

*539Before BARKDULL, C. J., and HEN-DRY and HAVERFIELD, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. Walker v. State, 152 Fla. 455, 13 So.2d 4; Redditt v. State, Fla.1959, 84 So.2d 317; Simpson v. State, Fla.App. 1964, 164 So.2d 224; Falagon v. State, Fla.App.1966, 186 So.2d 804; Simmons v. State, Fla.App. 1968, 212 So.2d 658; Peterson v. State, Fla.App.1970, 237 So.2d 223; Romero v. State, Fla.App.1971, 251 So.2d 137; State v. Silva, Fla. 1972, 259 So.2d 153.
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3231 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3231

    To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to permit tax-exempt 
            financing of certain transportation facilities.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 6, 1993

 Mr. Tucker (for himself, Ms. Roybal-Allard, Ms. Waters, Mr. Horn, Mr. 
   Becerra, and Ms. Harman) introduced the following bill; which was 
              referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to permit tax-exempt 
            financing of certain transportation facilities.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled, That (a) subsection (c) 
of section 142 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended--
            (1) by redesignating paragraph (2) as paragraph (3), and
            (2) by inserting after paragraph (1) the following new 
        paragraph:
            ``(2) Related transportation facilities.--
                    ``(A) In general.--Transportation facilities 
                (including trackage and rail facilities) used in 
                connection with the transport of cargo or passengers to 
                or from a facility described in paragraph (1) or (2) of 
                subsection (a) shall be treated as facilities described 
                in paragraph (1) or (2) but only so long as, during the 
                period that any tax-exempt private activity bond issued 
                to provide such facilities is outstanding, at least 80 
                percent of the use of such facilities (determined on an 
                annual basis) is in connection with the transport of 
                cargo or passengers to or from a facility described in 
                paragraph (1) or (2) of subsection (a).
                    ``(B) Governmental ownership requirement.--For 
                purposes of subparagraph (A) of subsection (b)(1), 
                facilities described in subparagraph (A) of this 
                paragraph leased by a governmental unit shall be 
                treated as owned by such governmental unit if the 
                requirements of clauses (i) and (iii) of subsection 
                (b)(1)(B) are satisfied. Rules similar to the rules of 
                the preceding sentence shall apply to management 
                contracts and similar types of operating or use 
                agreements.''
    (b) The amendment made by subsection (a) shall apply to obligations 
issued after the date of the enactment of this Act.

                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 10.3


 


PUT RIGHT AGREEMENT


 


This Put Right Agreement (this “Agreement”),
by and among Champions Oncology, Inc. (the “Company”), Joel Ackerman (“Ackerman”) and Ronnie
Morris (“Morris”), is dated effective as of January 29, 2014.


 


WHEREAS, the Company, Ackerman, Morris
and certain other persons and entities are party to a Securities Purchase Agreement dated as of March 24, 2011 (the “2011
Securities Purchase Agreement”) and a Securities Purchase Agreement dated as of January 28, 2013 (together with the 2011
Securities Purchase Agreement, the “Securities Purchase Agreements”), pursuant to which Ackerman, Morris and
the other persons and entities purchased shares of common stock from the Company and, in some cases, received warrants to purchase
additional shares;


 


WHEREAS, the Securities Purchase
Agreements both provide for the ability of the investors, under certain circumstances, to put their shares to the Company for the
original purchase price in the event of a Put Option Trigger Event (as defined in each of the Securities Purchase Agreements);


 


WHEREAS, Ackerman and Morris are
each a member of the Company’s Board of Directors;


 


WHEREAS, the Company and each of
Ackerman and Morris want to clarify their roles both as potential beneficiaries of the Put Rights (as defined in each of the Securities
Purchase Agreements) and members of the Company’s Board of Directors;


 


NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration
of the mutual promises made herein, and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby
acknowledged, the Company and each of Ackerman and Morris hereby agree as follows.


 


1.        Each of Ackerman and Morris hereby
agree that, if the Company’s Board of Directors is voting on a transaction, event or approval that would constitute a Put
Option Trigger Event, each of Ackerman and Morris shall either (a) recuse themselves from voting as a member of the Board of Directors
on such transaction, event or approval or (b) be entitled to vote but forego exercising or receiving the benefit of their Put Right
(as defined in each of the Securities Purchase Agreements).


 


2.        All other provisions of the Securities
Purchase Agreements shall remain intact. This Agreement shall be interpreted in accordance with the governing law and jurisdiction
provisions of the Securities Purchase Agreements. This Agreement may be executed in any number of counterparts, each of which shall
be deemed an original, and all of which together shall constitute one and the same instrument. This Agreement may be executed and
delivered by facsimile transmission or email.


 


[Remainder of page intentionally left blank]


 






    	 



    	 



    

 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties
hereto have executed this Agreement as of the date first written above.


  











	 	CHAMPIONS ONCOLOGY, INC.	 
	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 
	 	By:	/s/ David Sidransky	 
	 		Name: David Sidransky	 
	 		Title:   Chairman of the Board of Directors	 
	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 
	 	 	/s/ Joel Ackerman	 
	 	 	Joel Ackerman	 
	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 
	 	 	/s/ Ronnie Morris	 
	 	 	 Ronnie Morris
* This order and judgment is not binding precedent, e xcept under the doctrines

of law of the case, res judicata, and collateral es toppel. The court generally disfavors the citation of orders and judgments; nev ertheless, an order and judgment may be cited under the terms and conditions of 10thCir. R. 36.3.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS Filed 8/22/96 FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT

ESTHER MOSES, on behalf of Herbert Moses, deceased,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v. ROGER C. BOND, M.D.; SANFORD FITZIG, M.D.; ALEX D. AMMAR, M.D.; EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES OF SEDGWICK COUNTY; CHESTER L. PINKSTON, JR., Wichita Police ID 1438,

Defendants-Appellees. No. 95-3382 (D.C. No. 95-4112-DES) (D. Kan.)

ORDER AND JUDGMENT *

Before ANDERSON, LOGAN, and MURPHY, Circuit Judges.

After examining the briefs and appellate record, th is panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not materiallyassist the determination of-2-

this appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a); 10th Cir. R. 34.1.9. The c ase is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument. Plaintiff appeals the district court’s dismissal of her medical malpractice action for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. We review such a dismissal de novo. Laguna Gatuna, Inc. v. Browner , 58 F.3d 564, 565 (10th Cir. 1995), cert. denied , 116 S. Ct. 771 (1996). Generally, federal courts have subject matter juris diction only if a case involves parties with diverse citizenship in an act ion for at least $50,000, 28 U.S.C. § 1332, or if the case involves a question o f federal law, 28 U.S.C. § 1331. See United States ex rel. Gen. Rock & Sand Corp. v. Ch uska Dev. Corp. , 55 F.3d 1491, 1496 (10th Cir. 1995). Because all of the parties to this action are Kansas residents, plaintiff has failed to establish divers ity jurisdiction. See id. at 1495. Plaintiff also has failed to allege a federal claim against the defendant physicians. Further, even if we liberally construed plaintiff’s complaint to allege federal constitutional claims against the ambulance service and the police officer under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, see Haines v. Kerner , 404 U.S. 519, 520-21 (1972), those claims would be barred by the applicable two-year K ansas statute of limitations.-3-

See Baker v. Board of Regents , 991 F.2d 628, 630 & n.1 (10th Cir. 1993) (citing Kan. Stat. Ann. § 60-513(a)(4)). AFFIRMED. The mandate shall issue forthwith. Entered for the Court James K. Logan Circuit Judge
#### Jimmy Lee JONES, a/k/a Jimmie Lee Jones, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 73-1111.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Feb. 15, 1974.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
#### Mrs. Frances C. SIMMONS v. Leland BURCHFIELD.

No. 44560.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

Oct. 16, 1967.

Crawley, Brooks & Guyton, Kosciusko, for appellant.

Crawley & Ford, Kosciusko, for appellee.

PER, CURIAM.

Affirmed.
#### Joseph WALLER, Jr., Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

No. 43295.

Supreme Court of Florida.

April 16, 1973.

Certiorari denied. 270 So.2d 26.

CARLTON, C. J., and ROBERTS, ADKINS, McCAIN and DEKLE, JJ., concur.

ERVIN and BOYD, JJ., dissent.
#### Guss ROSS, Jr. v. STATE.

No. 37120.

Supreme Court of Florida.

April 1968.

Certiorari dismissed without opinion. 204 So.2d 269.
EX-10.1



 Exhibit 10.1 

AMENDMENT TO THE AMENDED AND RESTATED 

AGREEMENT OF LIMITED PARTNERSHIP OF 

WHEELER REIT, L.P. 

AMENDED DESIGNATION OF ADDITIONAL SERIES D 

CUMULATIVE CONVERTIBLE PREFERRED UNITS 

December 1, 2016 

Pursuant to the Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of Wheeler REIT, L.P., as amended (the “Partnership
Agreement”), the General Partner hereby amends the Partnership Agreement as follows: 
 1. Designation and Number. The number of
authorized Series D Preferred Units shall be 4,000,000. 
 2. Except as modified herein, all terms and conditions of the Partnership
Agreement shall remain in full force and effect, which terms and conditions the General Partner hereby ratifies and confirms. Capitalized terms used herein and not otherwise defined herein shall have the meanings ascribed to such terms in the
Partnership Agreement. 







 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Amendment as of the date first set forth
above. 
  

			
	GENERAL PARTNER:
	
	 WHEELER REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST, INC., a Maryland real estate

investment trust

		
	By:	 	 /s/ Jon S. Wheeler

	Name:	 	Jon S. Wheeler
	Title:	 	Chairman and Chief Executive Officer


 [Signature page for Amendment re: Series D Preferred Units - December 2016]
252 La. 825

#### STATE of Louisiana v. George A. SQUARE and James Willie Millsap.

No. 49511.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Sept. 27, 1968.

In re: George A. Square applying for writs of certiorari, mandamus and prohibition.

The application is granted insofar as application for admission to bail is concerned. In all other respects it is denied. On the showing made it does not appear that the trial judge abused his discretion. See order.

ORDER

Considering the showing made by applicant, George A. Square,

IT IS ORDERED That Honorable Jesse S. Heard, Judge of the Fourth Judicial District Court for the Parish of Ouachita, hold a hearing upon applicant’s motion applying for admission to bail, in accordance with the provisions of Article 313 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, LSA, on or before the 9th day of October, 1968, or show cause in this Court on Tuesday, October IS, 1968, at 11:00 a. m. why a hearing for admission to bail should not be granted.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, that, in the event the respondent judge fails to comply with the aforesaid order on or before October 9, 1968, a writ of certiorari issue herein directing said judge to transmit to the Supreme Court of Louisiana on or before October 15, 1968 the record, or a certified copy of the record in the proceedings complained by the relator herein, that the validity of said proceedings may be ascertained. During the interim, all further proceedings in said Fourth Judicial Court for the Parish of Ouachita, Louisiana, are stayed.
#### Hugh J. CARRAGHER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 72-350.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Feb. 16, 1973.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
# C_2016316EN.01023001.xml

| 30.8.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 316/230 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.8.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 316/230

---

P8_TA(2015)0058

Establishment of the General Fisheries Commission for the Mediterranean ***

European Parliament legislative resolution of 11 March 2015 on the draft Council decision on the acceptance, on behalf of the European Union, of the amended Agreement for the establishment of the General Fisheries Commission for the Mediterranean (14993/2014 — C8-0027/2015 — 2014/0274(NLE))

(Consent)

(2016/C 316/39)

The European Parliament,

The European Parliament

| — | having regard to the draft Council decision (14993/2014), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the draft Council decision (14993/2014),

| — | having regard to the draft amended Agreement for the establishment of the General Fisheries Commission for the Mediterranean (15458/2014), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the draft amended Agreement for the establishment of the General Fisheries Commission for the Mediterranean (15458/2014),

| — | having regard to the request for consent submitted by the Council in accordance with Article 43(2) and Article 218(6), second subparagraph, point (a), of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (C8-0027/2015), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the request for consent submitted by the Council in accordance with Article 43(2) and Article 218(6), second subparagraph, point (a), of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (C8-0027/2015),

| — | having regard to Rule 99(1), first and third subparagraphs, Rule 99(2), and Rule 108(7) of its Rules of Procedure, |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to Rule 99(1), first and third subparagraphs, Rule 99(2), and Rule 108(7) of its Rules of Procedure,

| — | having regard to the recommendation of the Committee on Fisheries (A8-0038/2015), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the recommendation of the Committee on Fisheries (A8-0038/2015),

| 1. | Gives its consent to conclusion of the amended Agreement; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Gives its consent to conclusion of the amended Agreement;

| 2. | Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council, the Commission and the governments and parliaments of the Member States and the General Fisheries Commission for the Mediterranean. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council, the Commission and the governments and parliaments of the Member States and the General Fisheries Commission for the Mediterranean.

---
Exhibit 32.2
  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 1350
 OF CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18 UNITED STATES CODE
  
   In connection with the Quarterly Report of Thermon Holding Corp. (the “Company”) for the quarterly period ended December 31, 2010 (the “Report”), I, Jay Peterson, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:
   (1)           The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
  (2)           Information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
  Date:  February 14, 2011
 
 
 By:
/s/ Jay PetersonName:
Jay PetersonTitle:
Chief Financial Officer
IIA

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 3186

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

NOVEMBER 16 (legislative day, NOVEMBER 2), 1993

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and

Public Works

AN ACT

To designate the United States courthouse located in Houma,

Louisiana, as the ‘‘George Arceneaux, Jr., United States

Courthouse’’.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

4 The United States courthouse located at 800 East

5 Main Street in Houma, Louisiana, is designated as the

6 ‘‘George Arceneaux, Jr., United States Courthouse’’.
2

•HR 3186 RFS

1 SEC. 2. LEGAL REFERENCES.

2 Any reference in a law, regulation, document, record,

3 map, or other paper of the United States to the courthouse

4 referred to in section 1 is deemed to be a reference to

5 the ‘‘George Arceneaux, Jr., United States Courthouse’’.

Passed the House of Representatives November 15,

1993.

Attest: DONNALD K. ANDERSON,

Clerk.
<PAGE>
                                                                   EXHIBIT 23.1


                     CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statement on Form S-8 (No 333-3910) of Schmitt Industries, Inc. of our report
dated July 14, 2000 relating to the financial statements, which appears in
this Form 10-K.



PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

Portland, Oregon
August 22, 2000
EXHIBIT 32.2

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                                   PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Anthony R. Turnbull, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge,
I-Web Media, Inc.'s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended
June 30, 2010 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the
financial condition and results of operations of I-Web Media, Inc.


Date: 8/13/10                              By: /s/ Anthony R. Turnbull
                                               ---------------------------------
                                           Name: Anthony R. Turnbull
                                           Title: Chief Financial Officer
#### Joseph M. (Joe) PURDY, Jr. v. STATE of Mississippi.

No. 47553.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

Dec. 3, 1973.

Rehearing Denied Jan. 14, 1974.

Fielding L. Wright, Jr., Pascagoula, for appellant.

A. F. Summer, Atty. Gen. by Ben H. Walley, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jackson, for ap-pellee.

Before GILLESPIE, C. J., and PATTERSON, SMITH, SUGG and WALKER, JJ.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Jackson County; Merle F. Palmer, Judge.

Affirmed.
#### James E. WILLIAMS, employee, Petitioner, v. SUNCOAST MOVING & STORAGE CO., INC., employer, et al., Respondents.

No. 43209.

Supreme Court of Florida.

April 16, 1973.

Certiorari denied.

CARLTON, C. J., and ROBERTS, ERVIN, ADKINS and BOYD, JJ., concur.’