alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 11

          CONVERSION TECHNOLOGIES INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

                STATEMENT OF COMPUTATION OF NET (LOSS) PER SHARE

               For the years ended June 30, 1998 and June 30, 1997

                                                  Year Ended         Year Ended
                                                 June 30, 1998     June 30, 1997
                                                 -------------     -------------

Loss before extraordinary item                    $ (8,666,278)    $(12,855,169)
                                                  ------------

Preferred Stock dividends                           (3,032,318)              --
                                                  ------------     ------------

Loss before extraordinary item
  attributable to common stockholders             $(11,698,596)    $(12,855,169)
                                                  ============     ============
Weighted average number of
   common shares outstanding                         4,804,427        4,773,311
                                                  ============     ============

Loss per common share before
  extraordinary item                              $      (2.44)    $      (2.69)
                                                  ============     ============

Extraordinary item                                $  6,425,004     $         --
                                                  ============     ============

Income per share from extraordinary item          $       1.34     $         --
                                                  ============     ============


Net loss                                          $ (2,241,274)    $(12,855,169)

Preferred stock dividends                           (3,032,318)
                                                  ------------     ------------

Net loss attributable to common
stockholders                                      $ (5,273,592)    $(12,855,169)
                                                  ============     ============

Net loss per common share                         $       1.10     $       2.69
                                                  ============     ============
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 06-7580
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus KAREN SUE JAMES, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Glen E. Conrad, District Judge. (5:05-cr-00001; 7:06-cv-00258-gec) Submitted: March 29, 2007 Decided: April 4, 2007 Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Karen Sue James, Appellant Pro Se. Donald Ray Wolthuis, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.- 2 - PER CURIAM: Karen Sue James seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on her 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that any assessment of the constitutional claims by the district court is debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by the district court is likewise debatable. Miller-El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee , 252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that James has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
# STATEOFLOUISIANA

COURTOFAPPEAL,

# FIRSTCIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA VERSUS REGINALD BROADWAY NO. 

### 2021 KW 1303 

### DECEMBER 30, 2021 In Re: Reginald 

### Broadway, applying for 

### supervisory writs,



### 19th Judicial District Court, Parish of East Baton Rouge, No. 

### DC -20- 02737. BEFORE: WHIPPLE, C.J., PENZATO AND HESTER, JJ.

WRIT DENIED AS MOOT. The records of the East Baton Rouge Parish 

### Clerk of Court' s Office reflect that the 

### district court acted on relator' s motion to 

### dismiss and motion 

### for bond reduction on March 3, 2021. VGW AHP CHH

COURT OF APPEAL, 

### FIRST CIRCUIT

DEPUTY C RK OF COURT



### FOR THE COURT
#### WHEATLAND HILLS CORP., a Delaware corporation, Appellant, v. Margaret F. MORTON, Appellee.

No. 66-498.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Third District.

May 9, 1967.

Rehearing Denied June 13, 1967.

Rutledge & Milledge, Miami, Rosin & Abel, Sarasota, for appellant.

Sibley, Giblin, Levenson & Ward, Miami Beach, John R. Barrett and Maurice M. Diliberto, Miami, for appellee.

Before HENDRY, C J., and CHARLES CARROLL and SWANN, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

The Circuit Court for Sarasota County had the power to place an equitable lien upon property located in Dade County which property belonged to a non-resident and was specifically described in publication of notice as property being proceeded against in a divorce suit in order to be subjected to the satisfaction of the claim for alimony and child support. Having been shown no reversible error, the decree appealed is affirmed. State of Florida v. Jacksonville, P. & M. R. R. Co., 16 Fla. 708, 722 (1878); Klausner v. Ader, Fla. App.1963, 156 So.2d 193; Webb v. Webb, Fla.App.1963, 156 So.2d 698; Wesner v. O’Brien, 56 Kan. 724, 44 P. 1090, 32 L.R.A. 289 (1896); Benner v. Benner, 63 Ohio St. 220, 58 N.E. 569 (1900); Reed v. Reed, 121 Ohio St. 188, 167 N.E. 684, 64 A.L.R. 1384. See Wagner v. Wagner, 110 U.S. App.D.C. 345, 293 F.2d 533, 538 note 5 (1961); Annotations 10 A.L.R.3d 212.

Affirmed.
THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13-21-00192-CR

James Charles Baker

v.

The State of Texas

On Appeal from the

156th District Court of Bee County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. B-20-2061-0-CR-B

JUDGMENT

THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on 

appeal, concludes that the judgment of the trial court should be affirmed. The Court 

orders the judgment of the trial court AFFIRMED.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

April 14, 2022
Exhibit 10.1




  
 

  
Procurement Delegation Agreement

  
 

  
Party A: Xi'an Hu County Yuxing Agriculture Technology Development Co., Ltd. ("Yuxing")

  
Party B: Xi’an Techteam Investment Holding Group

  
 

  
On November 1, 2013, Party A (Xi'an Hu County Yuxing Agriculture Technology Development Co., Ltd., ) the Corporation’s variable interest entity (“Yuxing”) entered into an agreement (the “Procurement Delegation Agreement”) with Party B (Techteam Investment Holding Group), pursuant to which, Party A is to delegate Party B to procure certain inventories from the market by utilizing its own resource advantage from November 1, 2013 to June 30, 2014 (the “Agreement Period”).

  
 

  
First, the scope and quality requirements for agricultural products

  
1.   Party B should purchase agricultural products in accordance with procurement list provided by Party A.

  
2.   Party A should provide the agricultural products procurement list to Party B in advance by 15 days, procurement list should include the products names, quantity and delivery time.  

  
3.   Party A’s procurement of agricultural products must match the relevant quality standards along with the inspection report, if no standard for agricultural products must ensure that such products are fresh produce, appearance intact, no disease, insects, mildew, pesticide residues and other impurities.

  
 

  
Second, place of delivery and acceptance check

  
Party B must deliver all agricultural products to Party A’s specified storeroom.  Party A signs the warehouse entry certificate after acceptance check. Party A repays the outstanding procurement amount to Party B periodically based on the warehouse entry certificate.

  
 

  
Third, the payment method

  
1. During the Agreement Period, Party B provides agricultural products to Party A by the actual purchase price without any charge. Other costs (freight, etc.) shall be taken by the Party A during this period.

  
 

  
2. Both parties shall settle payment every ten days because Party A need the multi-species, multi-batch agricultural products. Party B advances procurement payment to vendors, Party A reimburses Party B once Party B’s advance reach 1 million RMB.

  
 

  
Four, others

  
1. This agreement is effective from November 1, 2013 to June 30, 2014. In the meantime, both parties shall not terminate this agreement without a particular reason. Should there be other reasons that cause the termination of the agreement, such a party should notify the other party 20 days in advance, or will pay the full loss to the other party.

  
2. For the other outstanding issues, both sides shall timely negotiate with each other.

  
3. The contract is signed in duplicate. Each party holds one with effect from the date stamped by both parties.

  
 

  	
  
Party A: Seal affixed

	
  
Party B: Seal affixed


	
  
Date: November 1, 2013

	
  
Date: November 1, 2013
EXHIBIT 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. {section} 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of China Rising Star Limited (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending December 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Jeremy Mork, Chief Executive and Financial  Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. {section} 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes- Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



|Dated:  March 16, 2011
By  /s/ Jeremy Mork
-----------------------------
    Jeremy Mork
    Chief Executive and  Financial Officer
   (Principal Executive and Financial Officer)
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
# C_2015301EN.01001101.xml

| 12.9.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 301/11 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.9.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 301/11

---

Commission information notice pursuant to Article 16(4) of Regulation (EC) No 1008/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council on common rules for the operation of air services in the Community

Public service obligations in respect of scheduled air services

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2015/C 301/05)

| Member State | Italy |
| --- | --- |
| Route concerned | Reggio Calabria — Bologna and vice versa
  Reggio Calabria — Pisa and vice versa |
| Date of entry into force of the public service obligations | 10 December 2015 |
| Address where the text and any information and/or documentation relating to the public service obligation can be obtained | For further information, please contact:





  National Agency for Civil Aviation (ENAC) |
| Direzione sviluppo trasporto aereo |
| Viale del Castro Pretorio, 118 |
| 00185 Rome |
| ITALY |
| Tel. +39 0644596564 |
| Tel. +39 0644596591 |
| E-mail: osp@enac.gov.it |
| Internet | : | http://www.mit.gov.it
  http://www.enac.gov.it |

Member State

Italy

Route concerned

Reggio Calabria — Bologna and vice versa

Reggio Calabria — Pisa and vice versa

Date of entry into force of the public service obligations

10 December 2015

Address where the text and any information and/or documentation relating to the public service obligation can be obtained

For further information, please contact:

National Agency for Civil Aviation (ENAC)

Direzione sviluppo trasporto aereo

Viale del Castro Pretorio, 118

00185 Rome

ITALY

Tel. +39 0644596564

Tel. +39 0644596591

E-mail: osp@enac.gov.it

Internet

:

http://www.mit.gov.it

http://www.enac.gov.it

---
Exhibit 32.1    CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Quarterly Report of Santo Mining Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended October 31, 2013 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Alain French, Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:  (1)The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2)The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company. /s/ Alain FrenchAlain French

   President, Principal Executive Officer, Secretary, Treasurer,

   Principal Financial Officer, Director

   (Duly Authorized, Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer)Date: December 23, 2013
        A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Santo Mining Corporation and will be retained by Santo Mining Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





The
undersigned, Timothy J. Neher, the Chief Executive Officer, Chairman of the
Board of Directors and Treasurer of ACCELERATED ACQUISITIONS XII, INC. (the
“Company”), DOES HEREBY CERTIFY that:





1.  The Company's Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2010 (the “Report”),
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934; and





2.  Information contained in
the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operation of the Company.





IN WITNESS WHEREOF, each of the
undersigned has executed this statement this 16th day of November,
2010.





/s/
      Timothy J. NeherTimothy
      J. NeherChief
      Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
ACCELERATED ACQUISITIONS XII, INC. and will be retained by ACCELERATED
ACQUISITIONS XII, INC. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or its staff upon request.
EXHIBIT 32

<PAGE>


     In connection with the Quarterly  Report of Nano Labs Corp. (the "Company")
on Form 10-Q for the period  ending March 31, 2012 as filed with the  Securities
and  Exchange  Commission  (the  "Report"),   Bernardo  Camacho  Chavarria,  the
Principal Executive and Financial Officer of the Company, certifies, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to the best of his knowledge:

     (1)  The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects the financial condition and results of the Company.


May 11, 2012                        By:  /s/ Bernardo Camacho Chavarria
                                         ----------------------------------
                                         Bernardo Camacho Chavarria, Principal
                                         Executive and Financial Officer
<PAGE>
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 161 (Monday, August 20, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Page 42134]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-17924]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


Center for Scientific Review; Notice of Closed Meetings

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended, notice is hereby given of the following meetings.
    The meetings will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: Center for Scientific Review Special Emphasis 
Panel; PAR-18-208: Bioengineering Research Partnerships.
    Date: September 19, 2018.
    Time: 10:00 a.m. to 2:30 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, 6701 Rockledge Drive, 
Bethesda, MD 20892 (Virtual Meeting).
    Contact Person: Songtao Liu, MD, Scientific Review Officer, 
Center for Scientific Review, National Institutes of Health, 6701 
Rockledge Drive, Room 5118, Bethesda, MD 20817, 301-827-6828, 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#73001c1d1407121c5d1f1a06331d1a1b5d141c05"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="33405c5d5447525c1d5f5a46735d5a5b1d545c45">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Name of Committee: Center for Scientific Review Special Emphasis 
Panel; AREA Review: Bioengineering Sciences and Technologies (R15).
    Date: September 20, 2018.
    Time: 9:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, 6701 Rockledge Drive, 
Bethesda, MD 20892 (Virtual Meeting).
    Contact Person: David Filpula, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, 
Center for Scientific Review, National Institutes of Health, 6701 
Rockledge Drive, Room 6181, MSC 7892, Bethesda, MD 20892, 301-435-
2902, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#5b3d32372b2e373a3f291b363a323775353233753c342d"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="a4c2cdc8d4d1c8c5c0d6e4c9c5cdc88acacdcc8ac3cbd2">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.306, 
Comparative Medicine; 93.333, Clinical Research, 93.306, 93.333, 
93.337, 93.393-93.396, 93.837-93.844, 93.846-93.878, 93.892, 93.893, 
National Institutes of Health, HHS)


    Dated: August 15, 2018.
Melanie J. Pantoja,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2018-17924 Filed 8-17-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### STATE of Florida, Petitioner, v. Ronald Roy DAVIS, Respondent.

No. 44930.

Supreme Court of Florida.

March 22, 1974.

Certiorari denied.

ROBERTS, Acting C. J., and ERVIN, BOYD, McCAIN and DEKLE, JJ., concur.
```

[Federal Register: April 2, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 63)]
[Notices]               
[Page 16732]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr02ap10-36]                         

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMISSION ON CIVIL RIGHTS

 
Agenda and Notice of Public Meeting of the Nebraska Advisory 
Committee

    Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of the rules and 
regulations of the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights (Commission), and 
the Federal Advisory Committee Act (FACA), that a planning meeting of 
the Nebraska Advisory Committee to the Commission will convene by 
conference call at 2 p.m. and adjourn at approximately 3 p.m. on 
Thursday, April 22, 2010. The purpose of this meeting is to continue 
planning civil rights projects.
    This meeting is available to the public through the following toll-
free call-in number: (866) 364-7584, conference call access code number 
65896860. Any interested member of the public may call this number and 
listen to the meeting. Callers can expect to incur charges for calls 
they initiate over wireless lines, and the Commission will not refund 
any incurred charges. Callers will incur no charge for calls they 
initiate over land-line connections to the toll-free telephone number. 
Persons with hearing impairments may also follow the proceedings by 
first calling the Federal Relay Service at 1-800-977-8339 and providing 
the Service with the conference call number and contact name Farella E. 
Robinson.
    To ensure that the Commission secures an appropriate number of 
lines for the public, persons are asked to register by contacting 
Corrine Sanders of the Central Regional Office and TTY/TDD telephone 
number, by 4 p.m. on April 19, 2010.
    Members of the public are entitled to submit written comments. The 
comments must be received in the regional office by May 3, 2010. The 
address is U.S. Commission on Civil Rights, 400 State Avenue, Suite 
908, Kansas City, Kansas 66101. Comments may be e-mailed to 
frobinson@usccr.gov. Records generated by this meeting may be inspected 
and reproduced at the Central Regional Office, as they become 
available, both before and after the meeting. Persons interested in the 
work of this advisory committee are advised to go to the Commission's 
Web site, http://www.usccr.gov, or to contact the Central Regional 
Office at the above e-mail or street address.
    The meeting will be conducted pursuant to the provisions of the 
rules and regulations of the Commission and FACA.

    Dated in Washington, DC, March 29, 2010.
Peter Minarik,
Acting Chief, Regional Programs Coordination Unit.
[FR Doc. 2010-7406 Filed 4-1-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6335-02-P
```
#### Bernard GELTZER, Appellant, v. PAN AMERICAN BANK OF MIAMI, a domestic corporation, Dade-Commonwealth Title and Abstract Co., a domestic corporation, Appellees.

No. 67-122.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Third District.

April 25, 1967.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.