alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### DEPARTMENT OFTHE AIR FORCE AIR UNIVERSITY (AETC) 9 September 2015 MEMORANDUM FORU.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Docket Operations, M-30 West Building Ground Floor, Room Wl2-140 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE Washington, DC 20590 FROM: COMMUNITY COLLEGE OF THE AIRFORCE CCAF/DEAL 100 South Turner Boulevard Maxwell AFB, Gunter Annex, AL 36114-3011 SUBJECT: Renewal ofExemption 1. Reference to Exemption Number 10411A, Regulatory Docket Number FAA-2001-8750 (Originally Regulatory DocketNumber 27429), Petition of Community College of theAirForcefor an Exemption from§ 147.31 (c) (2) (iii) of the FederalAviation Regulation; reliefwas granted in the public interest since Community College ofthe Air Force curriculum conforms to the guidelines of FAA Advisory Circular 147-4. The granted exemption permits U.S. Air Force aviation maintenance technicians who have completed military aviation maintenance education and training courses to be evaluated using the same criteria that are used for the civilian sector. 2. The Community College ofthe Air Force shares regional aqcreditatioJ;l,with Air University bythe Commission on Colleges ofthe Southern Association

# ofCoJleges and. Schools (SACS). The Community College ofthe Air Force awards nine

### As~ociate in

### Appl~ecl'.Sei,en~e**d~grees** relevant to aviation maintenance disciplines and 59 other degrees designe(ffor specific Air Force occupational specialties. 3. The exemption granted to the Community College ofthe Air Force on 6 January 2014 expires on 28 February 2016. Since relieffrom§ 147.31 (c) (2) (iii) is still in the public interest and does not adversely affect safety, and since the reason and facts described in the original exemption remain unchanged, request the exemption be continued. 4. Thank you for your time and consideration concerning this matter. Ifyou have any questions or need further information, please contact me at (334) 649-5120 or email jason.smith.182@us.af.mil.

' ····· '. \ 

### ,.. _

;;:

. '
\: '\: .'**~** \ . \**-~** . '' . l ' (:**~** • • : •• './ ;, • \ I )• • • <

. '.

,J,, 

### , ..

'
. \,.

.,., 

# '.
:, t. <: .( ·' . ·!**~-** ' • : 'i.

· .. !'. 

## .· . H, GS-12, DAF .

. ,..

### #~ctor.,,**G~~de,ntialing .Progr~ms**  and**.,Co,.C~~ir-<JSAMTCC** '. . _ .

.. ·, ..

, ..· '.· ••· 1

I > 'L I ·'; i i
**Exhibit 32.2****Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**In connection with the Annual Report of FelCor Lodging Trust Incorporated (the “Registrant”) onForm 10-K for the three months and year ended December 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report), the undersigned hereby certifies, in thecapacity as indicated below and pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and  2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of Registrant.     February 28, 2007 /s/Andrew J. Welch         Andrew J. Welch    Chief Financial Officer
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH
, Appellant,

v.

SOUTH FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT and NORTHERN

PALM BEACH COUNTY IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT
, Appellee s

.

No. 4D 16

- 3953

[ November 16, 2017 ]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County ; Administrative Hearing

, SFWMD #2016

- 057DAO

- ERP

.

Kimberly L. Rothenburg, City Attorney, and Douglas N. Yeargin, Chief Assistant City Attorney, West Palm Beach, and Claudia M. McKenna, Lake Worth, for appellant.

Susan Roeder Martin, West Palm Beach, and Brian B. Joslyn of Ciklin Lubitz & O'Connell, West Palm Beach, for appellees.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed.

G ROSS
, M AY and K LINGENSMITH

, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
### THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13

- 21

- 00081

- CV

EDUCATION SERVICE CENTER REGION 2

v. AMANDA BARRERA
On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 2 of Nueces County , Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2019

- CCV

- 61753

- 2

JUDGMENT THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS , having considered this cause on appeal, concludes the judgment of the trial court should be reversed and rendered . The Court orders the judgment of the trial court REVERSED and RENDERS judgment in accordance with its opi nion

. Costs of the appeal are adjudged against appell ee

. We further order this decision certified below for observance. April 14, 2022
#### LUDLUM ENTERPRISES, INC., d/b/a Haskell’s Restaurant and Lounge, and Haskell M. Lieberman, Petitioners, v. PLASTICS DYNAMICS CORP., f/k/a Claude Southern Corporation, Respondent.

No. 69-810.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Dec. 30, 1970.

Constitutional writ dismissed.
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 165 (Friday, August 24, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Page 42940]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-18301]



[[Page 42940]]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Antitrust Division


Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and 
Production Act of 1993--Medical CBRN Defense Consortium

    Notice is hereby given that, on August 3, 2018, pursuant to Section 
6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 
15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), Medical CBRN Defense Consortium 
(``MCDC'') has filed written notifications simultaneously with the 
Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing changes in 
its membership. The notifications were filed for the purpose of 
extending the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust 
plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances.
    Specifically, Novici Biotech LLC, Vacaville, CA; GigaGen Inc., San 
Francisco, CA; Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN; 
Public Health Vaccines, LLC, Cambridge, MA; Kaleo, Inc., Richmond, VA; 
Sequoia Consulting Group, LLC, Solana Beach, CA; Inflammatix Inc., 
Burlingame, CA; Nano Terra, Inc., Cambridge, MA; Tech62, Fairfax, VA; 
Universal Stabilization Technologies, Inc., San Diego, CA; Southern 
Research Institute, Birmingham, AL; Adapt Pharma, Inc., Radnor, PA; 
Talis Biomedical Corporation, Chicago, IL; University of Maryland, 
College Park, MD; Inovio Pharmaceuticals, Plymouth Meeting, PA; 
Spectral Platforms, Monrovia, CA; BDO USA LLP, Mclean, VA; PharmaJet, 
Golden, CO; Consegna Pharma Inc., Pittsburgh, PA; and Tiba Biotech LLC, 
Cambridge, MA, have been added as parties to this venture.
    Also, MaxCyte, Inc., Gaithersburg, MD; Shield Analysis Technology, 
LLC, Manassas, VA; Kineta, Inc., Seattle, WA; and Pertaton (previously 
Harris Corp), Herndon, VA, have withdrawn as parties to this venture.
    No other changes have been made in either the membership or planned 
activity of the group research project. Membership in this group 
research project remains open, and MCDC intends to file additional 
written notifications disclosing all changes in membership.
    On November 13, 2015, MCDC filed its original notification pursuant 
to Section 6(a) of the Act. The Department of Justice published a 
notice in the Federal Register pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act on 
January 6, 2016 (81 FR 513).
    The last notification was filed with the Department on May 14, 
2018. A notice was published in the Federal Register pursuant to 
Section 6(b) of the Act on June 19, 2018 (83 FR 28446).

Suzanne Morris,
Chief, Premerger and Division Statistics Unit Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. 2018-18301 Filed 8-23-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4410-11-P
#### Joseph C. CORCELLER, Jr., and Rellecroc, Inc. v. John H. BROOKS, Laborde and Brooks and St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Co.

No. 60387.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Oct. 28, 1977.

In re: Joseph C. Corceller, Jr. and Relle-croc, Inc., applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, Parish of Jefferson, 347 So.2d 274.

Writ denied: The result is correct.

DIXON, J.,

concurs. The language and apparent reasons for the rulings of some of the holdings of the Court of Appeal seem incorrect, but for factual reasons disclosed in the Court of Appeal opinion, plaintiff properly could not recover.
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002, AS AMENDED

In connection with the Quarterly Report of PGI Energy Fund I Series 2010 Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period
ended September 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Lionel Johnson, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, do hereby certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, as amended, that, to the best of my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the
reporting requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|      |  |                    |  |  |  |         |  |                        
|----- |  | ------------------ |  |  |  | ------- |  | -----------------------
|Date: |  | November 22 , 2010 |  |  |  | Signed: |  | /s/ Lionel Johnson     
|      |  |                    |  |  |  |         |  | Lionel Johnson         
|      |  |                    |  |  |  |         |  | Chief Financial Officer
<PAGE>

                       SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

                             Washington, D.C. 20549

                                 --------------

                                    FORM 8-K

                                 CURRENT REPORT


                     PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE

                         SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934



Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported) September 22, 2000
                                                 ------------------------------


                                 QRS CORPORATION
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
               (Exact name of registrant as specified in charter)



         DELAWARE                     0-21958                   68-0102251
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(State or other jurisdiction        (Commission               (IRS Employer
        of incorporation)           File Number)            Identification No.)



1400 MARINA WAY SOUTH, RICHMOND, CALIFORNIA                             94804
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(Address of principal executive offices)                             (Zip Code)




Registrant's telephone number, including area code      (510) 215-5000
                                                    ---------------------------


                                 NOT APPLICABLE
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
         (Former name or former address, if changed since last report.)


<PAGE>

ITEM 4   CHANGES IN REGISTRANT'S CERTIFYING ACCOUNTANT

The Company has engaged PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as its new independent
accountants as of September 22, 2000. The Company has not consulted with
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP prior to its engagement regarding the application of
accounting principles to a specified transaction, either completed or proposed,
the type of audit opinion that might be rendered on the Company's financial
statements or any matter that was either the subject of a disagreement or a
reportable event within the meaning of Item 304(a)(1) of Regulation S-K.


                                       2
<PAGE>

                                    SIGNATURE

                  Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by
the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

                                                  QRS CORPORATION


Date:  September 26, 2000                         /s/ JOHN S. SIMON
                                                  ---------------------------
                                                  John S. Simon
                                                  Chief Executive Officer


                                       3
Exhibit 10.9


 





Brown Technical Media
Corp.


1517 San Jacinto Street


Houston, TX 77002


 


 


September 30, 2016


 


 


Evan Levine


 


La Jolla, CA


 


 


Brown Technical Media Corp. (Brown)
has retained Evan Levine (CONSULTANT) to provide Brown with business consulting services. We have prepared this agreement (hereinafter
referred to as the “Agreement”) to define the terms of this engagement. If this Agreement meets with your expectations,
you will need to sign in the space below demonstrating your acceptance thereto.


 


The effective date of this contract
is September 30, 2016.


 


Services


 


CONSULTANT will provide capital
formation consulting services and will assist BROWN develop a strategy to attract investors, including developing presentation
materials.


 


Compensation


 


The fee for the consulting
services is $10,000. BROWN will compensate CONSULTANT for these services by issuing Consultant 5,597,308 shares of BROWN’S
$0.001 par value restricted common stock. Compensation is based upon the number of shares issued and is not related to the current
or future price of BROWN common stock.


 


Other Matters


 


Based upon the terms and conditions
contained in this Agreement, BROWN is engaging CONSULTANT to perform consulting services at such places and times as may be reasonably
agreed to by BROWN and CONSULTANT. It is expressly understood and agreed that no provisions of this Agreement, nor any act of the
parties, shall be interpreted to create any relationship between BROWN and CONSULTANT other than that of independent contractor.
Each party agrees to keep confidential the proprietary information of the other party that may be learned during the course of
providing or receiving services under this Agreement. Neither party will disclose any proprietary or confidential information acquired
from the other under this Agreement, including trade secrets, business plans and confidential or other information which may be
proprietary to either CONSULTANT or BROWN.


 


Please indicate your
acceptance of the above understanding by signing below. A copy is enclosed for your records.


 


Sincerely,


Brown Technical Media Corp.


 


By: /s/ Steven M. Plumb


Name: Steven M. Plumb


Title:
Chief Financial Officer


 


Reviewed and accepted:


 


 


 











	/s/ Evan Levine


Evan Levine


	Date 9/30/16
Exhibit 32.01   CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Amended Quarterly Report of Pub Crawl Holdings, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q/A for the period ending March 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Peter J. Kremer, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:  (1)        The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2)        The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.      /s/ Peter J. Kremer By: Peter J. Kremer Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer  Dated: April 20, 2012  A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### Priestly Goodwin, Respondent, *vs.*The M., K. *&.*T. R. R. Co., Appellant.

1. Judgment affirmed.

*Appeal from Henry County Court of Common Pleas.*

*W. J.*Thornton, for Appellant.

*A. Budd,*for Respondent.

Adams, Judge,

delivered the opinion of the court.

This suit was originally commenced in a justice’s court, where the plaintiff had judgment, from which the defendant *436appealed to the Common Pleas, where the plaintiff again received judgment, from which the defendant has appealed to this court.

The suit was founded on account, for one hundred ties at fifty-five cents per tie. The evidence strongly tended to prove the plaintiff’s case. The only question raised was, whether the ties were sold to the defendant, or taken without leave. An instruction was given at the instance of the defendant raising this question, and upon the evidence the court found' for.the plaintiff.

We do not feel at liberty to disturb this finding. Judgment affirmed.

The other judges concur.
#### Daniel TUBBS, Appellant, v. DADE NATIONAL BANK OF MIAMI, a Florida Bank, and Delany & Delany, Inc., a Florida corporation, Appellees.

No. 71-496.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Oct. 20, 1971.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed.
#### Jeffrey FLAUM, Appellant, v. Karen FLAUM, Appellee.

No. 72-1290.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

May 8, 1973.

Fred A. Jones, Jr., and Martin Blitstein, Miami, for appellant.

Max B. Kogen, Miami, for appellee.

Before CHARLES A. CARROLL, HENDRY and HAVERFIELD, JJ. .

PER CURIAM.

The controlling point of appeal is whether the trial court erred in holding in its judgment of dissolution of marriage that *569the entire business or stock of a corporation known as Family Jewels, Inc., had been transferred to the wife by the husband and that the wife is now the owner thereof.

We have carefully considered the record on appeal and briefs of the parties and have concluded that no reversible error has been made to appear. King v. King, Fla.App.1958, 107 So.2d 259; Dillon v. Adams, Fla.App.1961, 126 So.2d 294.

Affirmed.
|   | 1. | The Annual Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the year ended June 30, 2012 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and |
|--------|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Dated: August 14, 2012 | By:/s/ Guo Wang                                      |   |
|------------------------|------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                   | Guo Wang                                             |   |
|                   | Chief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer) |   |
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

____________________________________

)

SAMAR CHATTERJEE, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

v. ) Civil Action No. 07-2172 (PLF)

)

U.S. CONSUL GENERAL et al., )

)

Defendants. )

____________________________________)

FINAL ORDER

For the reasons stated in the accompanying memorandum opinion, it is hereby

ORDERED that the complaint is dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction.

This is a final, appealable order. See Fed. R. App. P. 4.

/s/____________________________

PAUL L. FRIEDMAN

United States District Judge

DATE: August 27, 2009
# C_2015111EN.01000501.xml

| 1.4.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 111/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.4.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 111/5

---

Notice concerning the anti-dumping and countervailing measures in force in respect of imports into the Union of certain stainless steel wires originating in India: change of name of one company subject to an individual anti-dumping and countervailing duty rate

(2015/C 111/04)

Imports of certain stainless steel wires originating in India are subject to anti-dumping duties imposed by Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1106/2013 (1) (‘Regulation (EU) No 1106/2013’) and countervailing measures imposed by Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 861/2013 (2) (‘Regulation (EU) No 861/2013’).

1

2

Viraj Profiles Ltd, Thane, Maharashtra, a company subject to an individual anti-dumping duty of 6,8 %, following Regulation (EU) No 1106/2013, and to an individual countervailing duty of 0 %, following Regulation (EU) 861/2013, notified the Commission of its change of name and locations to Viraj Profiles Limited, Palghar, Maharashtra and Mumbai, Maharashtra.

The company argued that its change of name and locations does not affect its right to continue to benefit from the individual anti-dumping and countervailing duty rates previously applied to Viraj Profiles Ltd, Thane, Maharashtra (as mentioned in Regulation (EU) 1106/2013) or Viraj Profiles Vpl. Ltd, Mumbai, Maharashtra (as mentioned in Regulation (EU) 861/2013).

The Commission has examined the information supplied and concluded that the change of name and locations in no way affects the findings of Regulation (EU) No 1106/2013 and Regulation (EU) 861/2013.

Therefore, the reference in Article 1(2) of Regulation (EU) No 1106/2013 to:

Viraj Profiles Ltd, Thane, Maharashtra should be read as:

Viraj Profiles Limited, Palghar, Maharashtra and Mumbai, Maharashtra.

The reference in Article 1(2) of Regulation (EU) No 861/2013 to:

Viraj Profiles Vpl. Ltd, Mumbai, Maharashtra should equally be read as:

Viraj Profiles Limited, Palghar, Maharashtra and Mumbai, Maharashtra.

The TARIC additional code B780, previously attributed respectively to Viraj Profiles Ltd, Thane, Maharashtra, and Viraj Profiles Vpl. Ltd, Mumbai, Maharashtra, shall apply to Viraj Profiles Limited, Palghar, Maharashtra and Mumbai, Maharashtra.

---

(1)  Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1106/2013 of 5 November 2013 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty and collecting definitively the provisional duty imposed on imports of certain stainless steel wires originating in India (OJ L 298, 8.11.2013, p. 1).

1

(2)  Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 861/2013 of 2 September 2013 imposing a definitive countervailing duty and collecting definitively the provisional duty imposed on imports of certain stainless steel wires originating in India (OJ L 240, 7.9.2013, p. 1).

2

---
# C_2014408EN.01001201.xml

| 15.11.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 408/12 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.11.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 408/12

---

EUROPEAN INSTITUTE OF INNOVATION AND TECHNOLOGY

Publication of the final accounts for the financial year 2013

2014/C 408/12

The complete version of the final accounts may be found at the following address:

http://eit.europa.eu/interact/bookshelf/final-accounts-2013

---