alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                       2,533,072
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                2,799,143
<ALLOWANCES>                                 (386,686)
<INVENTORY>                                  3,697,972
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            10,841,458
<PP&E>                                       3,260,632<F1>
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              17,815,103
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        3,127,105
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        96,170
<OTHER-SE>                                   4,324,995
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                17,815,103
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            15,477,881
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                9,510,941
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            15,744,257
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           (14,341,753)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       (14,341,753)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                              (14,341,753)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (1.57)<F2>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.57)<F2>
<FN>
<F1>PP&E IS SHOWN NET OF ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION AS REPORTED WITHIN THE ANNUAL
REPORT ON FORM 10-K ON THE BALANCE SHEET
<F2>IN ACCORDANCE WITH SFAS NO. 128 "EARNINGS PER SHARE - BASIC" IS REPORTED AS THE
VALUE FOR (EPS-PRIMARY) TAG AND "EARNINGS PER SHARE-DILUTED" IS REPROTED AS THE
VALUE FOR (EPS-DILUTED) TAG
</FN>


</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1


CERTIFICATION OF THE PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER


PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)





Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned Chief Executive


Officer of Daniels Corporate Advisory, Inc. (the "Company") does hereby certify, to the best of such officer's knowledge, that:





1. The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Daniels Corporate Advisory Company, Inc. (the Company) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Dated: August 23, 2012/s/ Arthur D. ViolaChief Executive Officerand  Chief Financial Officer




The certifications set forth above are being furnished as an exhibit solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and shall not be deemed to be "filed" for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, nor shall they be deemed incorporated by reference in any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.




A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Daniels Corporate Advisory Company, Inc. and will be retained by Daniels Corporate Advisory Company, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
# C_2013235EN.01000201.xml

| 14.8.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 235/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.8.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 235/2

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

13 August 2013

2013/C 235/02

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,3290 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 130,27 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4592 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,85955 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 8,6624 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,2358 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 7,7960 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 25,874 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 298,87 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,7027 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,1913 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,4261 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,5624 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,4549 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,3715 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 10,3073 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,6618 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,6812 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 483,44 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 13,2219 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 8,1348 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,5385 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 13 690,22 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,3305 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 58,223 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 43,9468 |
| THB | Thai baht | 41,531 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 3,0483 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 16,9142 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 81,4460 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,3290

JPY

Japanese yen

130,27

DKK

Danish krone

7,4592

GBP

Pound sterling

0,85955

SEK

Swedish krona

8,6624

CHF

Swiss franc

1,2358

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

7,7960

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

25,874

HUF

Hungarian forint

298,87

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,7027

PLN

Polish zloty

4,1913

RON

Romanian leu

4,4261

TRY

Turkish lira

2,5624

AUD

Australian dollar

1,4549

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,3715

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

10,3073

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,6618

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,6812

KRW

South Korean won

1 483,44

ZAR

South African rand

13,2219

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

8,1348

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,5385

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

13 690,22

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,3305

PHP

Philippine peso

58,223

RUB

Russian rouble

43,9468

THB

Thai baht

41,531

BRL

Brazilian real

3,0483

MXN

Mexican peso

16,9142

INR

Indian rupee

81,4460

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Aviation Administration
August 16,2012 New England Region Office of the Regional Counsel

FACSIMILE (202) 366-7536 & U.S. FIRST CLASS MAIL
The Honorable J.E. Sullivan, ALJ Office ofHearings U.S. Department ofTransportation 1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. (Ell-310) Washington, D.C. 20590 Inthe Matter ofDaniel Quinonez DocketNo. FAA-2012-0473 Case No. 2012EA610020 Dear Judge Sullivan: 12 New England Executive Park Burlington, MA 01803-5299 Telephone: (781) 238-7058 FAX: (781) 238-7055

As the parties have settledthis matter, enclosed please find a Joint Withdrawal ofAppeal and Complaint inthe above-referenced matter. Sincerely,

R. BENNETT SARGENT Attorney Enclosures
cc: Hearing Docket Mr. Daniel Quinonez 

# RECEIVED AUG 2 12012 

# HEARING DOCKET

## U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION



## In the matter of: FAA Case No. 2012EA610020 DA.1"1IEL QUINONEZ, FAADocket No. FAA-2012-0473 Respondent Date: August 13,2012 Judge J.E. Sullivan
JOINT \VITHDRA WAL OF APPEAL 

## & COMPLAINT The parties in the above-captioned action have settled this case and pursuant to Section 13.215 ofthe Rules ofPractice in FAA Civil Penalty Actions 14 C.F.R. § 13.215 Complainant hereby withdraws its Complaint andRespondent hereby withdraws his request 

## for hearing. Respectful!;.· submitted,



## TT SARGENT, Attorney Federal Aviatwn Administration Office ofthe Regional Counsel 11 

## New England Executive Park Burlmgton, Massachusetts, 01803-5299 Tel: 781-238-7058 '

# .I 11 .·



## . .

. 

## Frances 

## A. Vargas for Daniel Quinonez, Respondent 1012 Eastern Avenue Fall River. 1\1A 02723 

## Tel: 508-496-8710CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I certify that the foregoing has been mailed this date by First Class U.S. Mail, to: Respondent Mr. Daniel Quinonez c/o Frances Vargas 1012 Eastern Avenue Fall River, MA 02723 I certify thatthe foregoing has been sent viaFacsimile and byFirst Class U.S. Mail this date to:
Administrative Law Judge The Honorable J.E. Sullivan Office ofHearings, M-20 U.S. Department ofTransportation 1200 NewJersey Avenue, S.E. (Ell-310) Washington, DC 20590 Fax: (202) 366-7536 And Hearing Docket (Original & One copy) Federal Aviation Administration 800 Independence Avenue, SW Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2W1000 Washington, DC 20591 Fax: (202) 493-5142 Attn: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430

Y; Dated August aralegal/Management Program Analyst
Exhibit 32.2 Certification of the Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report of FXCM INC. (the Company) on Form 10-Q filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Robert Lande, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: (1)

          The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2)

          The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. By:

          /s/ Robert LandeRobert Lande Chief Financial Officer Date: August 9, 2012  *

          The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.
Search Help More Sear c
EERE Information Center


## Commercial Unitary Air Conditioners and Heat Pumps Advance Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
Followin g the Framework Document, the Department of Ener g y is now publishing its Advance Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (ANOPR). The ANOPR is the first stage of the overall standards rulemaking process. This will be followed by a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NOPR) and a final rule. At the ANOPR stage, the Department carries out seve ral analyses, including the Engineering Analysis, the Life-C ycle Cost Analysis, and the National Impact Analysis. Stakehol ders are invited to review the ANOPR documents and the analytical tools, participate in webcasts, attend the public me etings, and submit comments on the Department's analysis.

Some of the following documents are available as Adobe Acrobat PDFs. Download Acrobat Reader

.

z ANOPR Internet Webcast

z ANOPR Public Meeting

z ANOPR Federal Register Notice ( PDF 300 KB )

z ANOPR Technical Support Document

z ANOPR Analytical Tools and Presentations

z ANOPR Independent Review of An alyses. The Department of Energy contracted with an independent team of experts to conduct a review of the ANOPR analyses for commercial unitary air conditioners and heat pumps. November 2003 report: Review of Analyses in Support of Proposed U.S. DOE ANOPR on Energy Conservation Standards for Commercial Unitary Air Condit ioners and Heat Pumps ( PDF 646 KB )



### How to Submit Comments You may submit comments electronic ally, by mail, or by courier. Wherever possible, comments in the electronic format should carry the electronic signature of the author. Absent an electronic signature, comments submitted el ectronically must be followed and authenticated by submitting the signed original paper document.Email: commercialairconditioner.anopr@ee.doe.gov

Mail: Ms. Brenda Edwards-Jones, U.S. Department of Energy, Building Technologies Program, Mailstop EE-2J, 1000 Independence Avenue, SW, Washington, DC 20585-0121

Courier: Ms. Brenda Edwards-Jones, U.S. Department of Ener g y, Building Technologies Program, Room 1J-018, 1000 Independence Avenue, SW, Washington, DC 20585-0121. Telephone: 202-586-2945

Comments should clearly identify the Docket number, which is EE-RM/STD-01-375

.
The deadline for submitting co mments is November 12, 2004.

Printable Version

Webmaster | Security & Privacy | Building Technologies Program Home | EERE Home U.S. Department of Energy Content Last Updated: 07/29/2004
#### Eddie James MOORE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. O-94.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Dec. 15, 1970.

*869Richard W. Ervin, III, Public Defender, for appellant.

Earl Faircloth, Atty. Gen., and Wallace E. Allbritton, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appel-lee.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant seeks review of a judgment of conviction and sentence based upon his pleas of guilty of the offenses of aggravated assault. It is appellant’s contention that the lower court erred in not determining before it accepted his guilty pleas that such pleas were voluntarily, knowingly and understandingly made. ''

We have given full consideration to the record and briefs of the parties and it appearing therefrom that appellant has failed to demonstrate that prejudicial error was committed in the proceedings below, the judgment appealed herein is affirmed upon the authority of McPherson v. State, 237 So.2d 18 (Fla.App. 1st, 1970). This holding is without prejudice to appellant’s right to challenge the voluntariness of his plea and the validity of the judgment based thereon pursuant to the procedure authorized by Criminal Procedure Rule 1.850, 33 F.S.A.

Affirmed.

JOHNSON, C. J., and SPECTOR and WIGGINTON, JJ., concur.
EXHIBIT 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. {section} 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Dunhuang Treasures Limited (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Jeremy Mork, Chief Executive and Financial  Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. {section} 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes- Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



|Dated:  May 13, 2011
By  /s/ Jeremy Mork
-----------------------------
    Jeremy Mork
    Chief Executive and  Financial Officer
   (Principal Executive and Financial Officer)
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
#### Gladys LOVERIN, Appellant, v. PAPPAS BROTHERS, INC., a Florida corporation, Appellee.

No. 72-22.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Feb. 16, 1973.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-6157

VESTEL MCKINLEY MOYER,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

PATRICIA HUFFMAN; EDWARD W. MURRAY,

Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Samuel G. Wilson, Chief District

Judge. (CA-94-344-R)

Submitted: May 29, 1997 Decided: June 10, 1997

Before NIEMEYER, LUTTIG, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Vestel McKinley Moyer, Appellant Pro Se. Eugene Paul Murphy,

OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for

Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying

relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 &

Supp. 1997), alleging ineffective assistance of counsel in failing

to pursue Appellant's appeal rights. We have reviewed the record

and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. The

district court's determination of credibility will not be disturbed

on appeal. United States v. Locklear, 829 F.2d 1314, 1317 (4th Cir.

1987). Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Exhibit 10.2 Termination of Management Consulting Agreement


Exhibit 10.2




HAROLD C. MOLL

Box 866, Georgetown, 

Grand Cayman, British West Indies

(818)-249-1157




February 4, 2014




SAASMAX, INC.

3254 Prospect Ave.

La Crescenta, CA  91214




Attention:  Board of Directors of SaaSMax, Inc. 




Dear Sirs:




RE:

SAASMAX, INC. (the “Corporation”)




·

Resignation as Officer and Director




·

Termination of Management Consulting Agreement dated July 22, 2013




I hereby resign as the Company’s Chief Executive Officer, President and a Director.  I hereby confirm that the management consulting agreement dated July 22, 2013 (the “Agreement”) is terminated and I am not entitled to any other payment thereunder and hereby surrender for cancellation to the Company the 750,000 earn-out shares issued to me under the Agreement.




Yours truly,




/s/ Harold C. Moll




HAROLD C. MOLL
<PAGE>

                                                                   Exhibit 23.1


                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS


We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements on Forms S-8 (No. 333-59843 and 333-371111) of our report dated
May 26, 2000 relating to the financial statements of PixelCam, Inc. which
appears in the Current Report on Form 8-K/A of Zoran Corporation dated
June 28, 2000.


/s/  PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

San Jose, California
September 12, 2000
-84 -82 -80 -78 -76 -74

 36

 38

 40

 42

★

▲

▲

▲

▲

★ ▲

▲

▲

▲

 500

 1000

 1500

 500

18 12 06 00

08/17

NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL

 Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 17 Aug 07

 EDAS Meteorological Data

Source

★ at 38.90 N 76.65 W Meters AGL
# C_2015308EN.01000402.xml

| 18.9.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 308/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.9.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 308/4

---

Information communicated by Member States regarding closure of fisheries

(2015/C 308/06)

In accordance with Article 35(3) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1224/2009 of 20 November 2009 establishing a Community control system for ensuring compliance with the rules of the common fisheries policy (1), a decision has been taken to close the fishery as set down in the following table:

1

| Date and time of closure | 1.1.2015 |
| --- | --- |
| Duration | 1.1.2015-31.12.2015 |
| Member State | Ireland |
| Stock or Group of stocks | PCR/N1GRN. |
| Species | Snow crab (Chionoecetes spp.) |
| Zone | Greenland waters of NAFO 1 |
| Type(s) of fishing vessels | — |
| Reference number | 28/TQ104 |

Date and time of closure

1.1.2015

Duration

1.1.2015-31.12.2015

Member State

Ireland

Stock or Group of stocks

PCR/N1GRN.

Species

Snow crab (Chionoecetes spp.)

Chionoecetes

Zone

Greenland waters of NAFO 1

Type(s) of fishing vessels

—

Reference number

28/TQ104

---

(1)  OJ L 343, 22.12.2009, p. 1.

1

---
251 La. 1032

#### LOUISIANA STATE BOARD OF MEDICAL EXAMINERS v. Melvin D. EASTMAN.

No. 49167.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

March 27, 1968.

In re: Melvin D. Eastman applying for writs of prohibition, certiorari and mandamus.

Application not considered. The applicant makes no showing that remedial writs have been denied by the Court of Appeal. This Court will not exercise its supervisory jurisdiction until the remedies in that court have been exhausted. See Moity v. Mahfouz, 242 La. 625, 137 So.2d 514 (per curiam), and Louisiana State Board of Medical Examiners v. Boyd, 251 La. 1043, 208 So.2d 321.
<PAGE>


                                   EXHIBIT 10.8
                                FIRST AMENDMENT TO
                         THE INDUSTRIAL/COMMERCIAL LEASE






<PAGE>


             ADDENDUM TO STANDARD INDUSTRIAL/COMMERCIAL SINGLE LEASE
                              AGREEMENT BETWEEN:

                     THE ALLAN AND GEORGIANNA KOLSKY TRUST
                                      AND
                        HYDROGEN BURNER TECHNOLOGY, INC.

The Lessor and Lessee agree to extend the original lease dated March 27,1998
by one year. The term of the lease extension will cover the period from
April 1, 1999 through March 31, 2000. The rent will increase by 4.5% during
the lease extension. All other terms of the original lease will remain
unchanged and in effect including, two three year options to extend the lease
and six months minimum notice to the Lessor if Lessee intends to exercise the
lease options or vacate the property at 3925 Vernon Street, Long Beach, CA.

       Agreed to by:


       /s/ ALLAN KOLSKY                       Date: 10/22/98
       -------------------                          --------
       Mr. Allan Kolsky
       Trustee


       /s/ DAVID MOARD                        Date: 10/21/98
       -------------------                          --------
       Mr. David Moard
       President
#### Willie Lawrence WEBB, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 72-1238.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

May 15, 1973.

Willie Lawrence Webb, in pro. per.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., for appel-lee.

Before CHARLES CARROLL, HEN-DRY and HAVERFIELD, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

This court, proceeding in the manner outlined and recommended by the Supreme Court of the United States in Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 744, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493, having deferred ruling on a motion of the public defender to withdraw as counsel for the indigent defendant-appellant, and having furnished appellant with a copy of the public defender’s memorandum brief, and having allowed the appellant a reasonable specified time within which to raise any points that he chose in support of this appeal, and the appellant having filed his response thereto, on consideration thereof upon full examination of the proceedings we conclude that the appeal is wholly frivolous. Whereupon, the public defender’s said motion to withdraw is granted, and the order or judgment appealed is hereby affirmed.
# C_2015305EN.01000402.xml

| 16.9.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 305/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.9.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 305/4

---

Information communicated by Member States regarding closure of fisheries

(2015/C 305/06)

In accordance with Article 35(3) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1224/2009 of 20 November 2009 establishing a Community control system for ensuring compliance with the rules of the common fisheries policy (1), a decision has been taken to close the fishery as set down in the following table:

1

| Date and time of closure | 14.7.2015 at 00.00 UTC |
| --- | --- |
| Duration | 14.7.2015 until 31.12.2015 |
| Member State | European Union (All Member States) |
| Stock or Group of stocks | RED/N3M |
| Species | Redfish (Sebastes spp) |
| Zone | NAFO 3M |
| Type(s) of fishing vessels | — |
| Reference number | 19BIS/TQ104 |

Date and time of closure

14.7.2015 at 00.00 UTC

Duration

14.7.2015 until 31.12.2015

Member State

European Union (All Member States)

Stock or Group of stocks

RED/N3M

Species

Redfish (Sebastes spp)

Zone

NAFO 3M

Type(s) of fishing vessels

—

Reference number

19BIS/TQ104

---

(1)  OJ L 343, 22.12.2009, p. 1.

1

---