alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3564 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3564

To amend section 255 of the National Housing Act to make homeowners who 
 are at least 50 years of age and disabled or blind eligible for home 
        equity conversion mortgages insured under such section.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           November 19, 1993

 Mr. Lipinski introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
            Committee on Banking, Finance and Urban Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend section 255 of the National Housing Act to make homeowners who 
 are at least 50 years of age and disabled or blind eligible for home 
        equity conversion mortgages insured under such section.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Disabled and Blind Homeowners Home 
Equity Conversion Mortgage Act''.

SEC. 2. DEFINITIONS.

    Section 255(b) of the National Housing Act (12 U.S.C. 1715z-20(b)) 
is amended--
            (1) in paragraph (1), by striking ``terms `elderly 
        homeowner' and `homeowner' mean'' and inserting ``term `elderly 
        homeowner' means''; and
            (2) by adding at the end the following new paragraph:
            ``(4) The term `homeowner' means an elderly homeowner or an 
        older disabled or blind homeowner.
            ``(5) The term `older disabled or blind homeowner' means 
        any homeowner who is, or whose spouse is--
                    ``(A) at least 50 years of age; and
                    ``(B) determined by the Secretary to be disabled or 
                blind under the meanings given such terms pursuant to 
                section 1614 of the Social Security Act, and in making 
                such a determination for an individual the Secretary 
                shall consider any previous determination of the 
                Secretary of Health and Human Services that the 
                individual is or is not disabled or blind for purposes 
                of such section.''.

SEC. 3. ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS.

    Section 225(d)(2)(A) of the National Housing Act (12 U.S.C. 1715z-
20(d)(2)(A)) is amended by inserting ``or an older disabled or blind 
homeowner'' before the semicolon at the end.

SEC. 4. CONFORMING AMENDMENTS.

    Section 225 of the National Housing Act (12 U.S.C. 1715z-20(a)) is 
amended--
            (1) in subsection (a), by inserting ``and older disabled or 
        blind homeowners'' after ``homeowners'' each place it appears; 
        and
            (2) in subsection (c)(1), by inserting ``and older disabled 
        or blind homeowners'' after ``homeowners''.

                                 <all>
```
## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 01-1226

___________ Pete Wright, * * Appellant, * * v. * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the Michael Groose, Assistant Director, * Eastern District of Missouri. Department of Corrections; Douglas * Prudden, Superintendent I of NECC; * [UNPUBLISHED] Joyce Stout, CCW; S. Johnson, COI; * Chantay Burks, CST Housing Unit 7; * S. Anderson, COI; C. Hartigen, COI; * Jim Underwood, CST Officer; Lisa * Harris, Functional Unit Manager * Housing Unit 1; Joseph B. Tiffany, * Functional Unit Manager House Unit 7; * Roger Rutledge, Caseworker Housing * Unit 6; Unknown Dedrick, COII; * Stephen L. Slawson, COIII; Carl * Sampson, Caseworker, Housing Unit 7; * Rodney Kueffer, Inmate Finance * Officer, * * Appellees. *

___________ Submitted: October 3, 2001 Filed: October 9, 2001

___________ Before HANSEN, FAGG, and BEAM, Circuit Judges.1 The Honorable CarolE. Jackson, United States District Judge for the Eastern

District of Missouri. -2- ___________ PER CURIAM. Missouriprisoner Pete Wright appeals from the district court’s 1 adverse dispositi on of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action against various prison officials. Having thoroughlyreviewed the record, we conclude that the district court properly disposed of Wright’s claims. Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. A true copy.
Attest: CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

 

**PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2015 (the “Report”) of New Mountain Finance Corporation (the “Registrant”), as filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Robert A. Hamwee, the Chief Executive Officer of the Registrant, hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge, that:

 

(1)           The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

(2)           The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.

 
| /s/   ROBERT A. HAMWEE |               |
|------------------------|--------------------|
|                   |               |
| Name:                  | Robert   A. Hamwee |   |
| Date:                  | May 5,   2015 |   |

 

----
252 La. 832

#### Hugh A. HAWTHORNE et al. v. HUMBLE OIL & REFINING COMPANY.

No. 49346.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Oct. 3, 1968.

In re: Humble Oil & Refining Company applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, Parish of Assumption. 210 So.2d 110.

Writ refused. The judgment complained ■of presents no error of law.
From: Yanca, Catherine

To: Yanca, Catherine

Subject: FW: Utah: Tier 3 impacts on refineries

Date: Wednesday, June 05, 2013 2:19:40 PM

From: Yanca, Catherine

Sent: Thursday, May 30, 2013 8:38 AM

To: 'rob@healutah.org'

Cc: Iffland, JoNell

Subject: RE: Utah: Tier 3 impacts on refineries

Hi Mr. DeBirk,

Thank you for your question on Tier 3 and refinery impacts. The Tier 3 gasoline sulfur control is

expected to result in some small emissions increases at some of the refineries. The analysis

performed for the proposal was a worst-case analysis for the purposes of estimating potential

permit requirements

. Unfortunately, we are unable to release any refinery-specific information

from our modeling as it is based on various sources of confidential business information (CBI), and

even releasing the model results might allow people to infer some of this CBI. Nevertheless, given

the large vehicle emission reductions expected from the Tier 3 program, including those that occur

immediately with gasoline sulfur control, we anticipate that the Tier 3 standards when

implemented will reduce overall emissions in the Salt Lake City Valley.

Regards,

~Cay Yanca

Catherine (Cay) A. Yanca

US EPA Office of Transportation and Air Quality

Assessment and Standards Division

2000 Traverwood Drive

Ann Arbor, MI 48105

Phone: 734.214.4769

From: Rob DeBirk [mailto: rob@healutah.org ]

Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2013 4:47 PM

To: Iffland, JoNell

Subject: Utah: Tier 3 impacts on refineries

Ms. Iffland,

Tim Russ of the USEPA Region 8 recommended that I contact you regarding a question I

have about the EPA's Tier 3 proposal.

I work for a small non profit environmental organization in SLC, UT. As I'm sure you know,SLC has severe air pollution problems particularly during the winter and summer months. My

organization is working in SLC to build local public and political support for the EPA's Tier

3 proposal.

I'm interested in learning whether the Tier 3 low sulfur gasoline fuel standards stand to

potentially increase emissions at refineries? I've found information in the Draft Regulatory

Impact Analysis indicating that the new fuel standards may result in some refineries having

increased emissions. However, I'm interested in learning specifically whether the new fuel

standards would possibly result in increased emissions from the Holly Refinery located just

outside of downtown Salt Lake City?

Can you help e find the answer to this question or put me in touch with someone who may be

able to help?

Thank you for your time.

Best,

Rob DeBirk

HEAL Utah

801.355.5055 w

801.712.7196 c

rob@healutah.org

-- Campaign Strategist

HEAL Utah

801.355.5055 w

801.712.7196 c

rob@healutah.org
February 18,2015 

750 W. Perimeter Rd l.'nit #l 

(415) 228-9510 

Office ofthe Chief Counsel 

Renton, 'YA 9805j 

(425) 128-9511 fax 

Attention: FAA Part 16 Docket Clerk, AGC-600 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue SW 

Washington, DC 20591 

RE: Part 16 Complaint: Pro-Flight Aviation, Inc. v. City of Renton 

FAA Docket Number 16-15-03 

Dear Sir or Madam: 

Pro-Flight Aviation, Inc. has received a letter from Ms. Zanetta Fontes, dated February 

12, 2015. In her letter, Ms. Fontes objects to the service of the above named Part 16 

complaint stating that the complaint was improperly served on the City Attorney's office. 

Ms. Fontes further states that the only locations within the City of Renton that are 

authorized to accept such service are the City Clerk's Office and the Mayor's office. 

We have been unable to find any references on the City's website regarding which 

offices within the City are authorized to receive service documents. 

Pro-Flight Aviation seeks to resolve this matter quickly as time is of the essence. To that 

end, I have hand delivered a copy of the original complaint document to the Mayor's 

office today. 

Attached is a Certificate of Service for the Complaint and an additional Certificate of 

service for this letter. 

Thank you for your prompt attention to this matter. 

Respectfully yours, 

3aP~ Bernard A. Paholke 

Vice President 

Pro-Flight Aviation, Inc. 
750 W. Perimeter Rd t:nit #I 

(425) 228-9510 

Renton. WA 98057 

(425)118-95ll fax. 

Certificate of Service 

I certify that I have this day served the foregoing Part 16 Complaint: Pro-Flight Aviation 

v. City of Renton FAA Docket Number 16-15-03 on the following person at the 

following address by hand delivery. 

Mayor Denis Law/ t_ 1 '/ I( C.- L 02. 1 L 

City of Renton, v/ A 

1055 South Grady Way 

Renton, W A 98057 

Dated this 18th day of February, 2015. 

Received by: 

v ' . 

OriS L Cf.,_u 

for the City of Renton. 

C\1'1 OF p,Et-HON 

DallJRY w tr5 R Er:Js e0 fT-J /YJ;;t '/tH"L's 

fl f'J b t-v A-S 11 cc.. efJ no ;4/ C.t IV f... t... ff.l( 's o ;:.: ~~ c:. ~
# C_2015418EN.01001501.xml

| 16.12.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 418/15 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.12.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 418/15

---

Information communicated by Member States regarding closure of fisheries

(2015/C 418/07)

In accordance with Article 35(3) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1224/2009 of 20 November 2009 establishing a Community control system for ensuring compliance with the rules of the common fisheries policy (1), a decision has been taken to close the fishery as set down in the following table:

1

| Date and time of closure | 3.12.2015 |
| --- | --- |
| Duration | 3.12 – 31.12.2015 |
| Member State | Spain |
| Stock or Group of stocks | GHL/N3LMNO |
| Species | Greenland halibut (Reinhardtius hippoglossoides) |
| Zone | NAFO 3LMNO |
| Type(s) of fishing vessels | — |
| Reference number | 67/TQ104 |

Date and time of closure

3.12.2015

Duration

3.12 – 31.12.2015

Member State

Spain

Stock or Group of stocks

GHL/N3LMNO

Species

Greenland halibut (Reinhardtius hippoglossoides)

Reinhardtius hippoglossoides

Zone

NAFO 3LMNO

Type(s) of fishing vessels

—

Reference number

67/TQ104

---

(1)  OJ L 343, 22.12.2009, p. 1.

1

---
#### Gary Edward HOLSTEIN v. STATE.

No. 37115.

Supreme Court of Florida.

April 1968.

Certiorari dismissed without opinion. 206 So.2d 681.
# C_2018035EN.01015401.xml

| 31.1.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 35/154 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

31.1.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 35/154

---

P8_TA(2016)0027

Amendments to the 1998 Protocol to the 1979 Convention on long-range transboundary air pollution on persistent organic pollutants ***

European Parliament legislative resolution of 2 February 2016 on the draft Council decision on the acceptance of the Amendments to the 1998 Protocol to the 1979 Convention on Long-Range Transboundary Air Pollution on Persistent Organic Pollutants (08651/2015 — C8-0158/2015 — 2014/0358(NLE))

(Consent)

(2018/C 035/31)

The European Parliament,

The European Parliament

| — | having regard to the draft Council decision (08651/2015), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the draft Council decision (08651/2015),

| — | having regard to the Amendments to the 1998 Protocol to the 1979 Convention on Long-Range Transboundary Air Pollution on Persistent Organic Pollutants (08651/2015 ADD 1 and ADD 2), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the Amendments to the 1998 Protocol to the 1979 Convention on Long-Range Transboundary Air Pollution on Persistent Organic Pollutants (08651/2015 ADD 1 and ADD 2),

| — | having regard to the request for consent submitted by the Council in accordance with Article 192(1) and Article 218(6), second subparagraph, point (a), of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (C8-0158/2015), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the request for consent submitted by the Council in accordance with Article 192(1) and Article 218(6), second subparagraph, point (a), of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (C8-0158/2015),

| — | having regard to Rule 99(1), first and third subparagraphs, Rule 99(2), and Rule 108(7) of its Rules of Procedure, |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to Rule 99(1), first and third subparagraphs, Rule 99(2), and Rule 108(7) of its Rules of Procedure,

| — | having regard to the recommendation of the Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety (A8-0001/2016), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the recommendation of the Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety (A8-0001/2016),

| 1. | Gives its consent to acceptance of the Amendments to the Protocol; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Gives its consent to acceptance of the Amendments to the Protocol;

| 2. | Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council, the Commission and the governments and parliaments of the Member States. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council, the Commission and the governments and parliaments of the Member States.

---
EX-10.11



 Exhibit 10.11 

Schedule to Officer Severance Agreement 

The following is a list of our officers who are party to the company’s Officer Severance Agreement, the form of which was filed as an
exhibit to the company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ending 3/25/2006: 
 Glenn Muir
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14 I, Alexandre Frigon, the President, CEO of Xumanii, Inc.. (the “Registrant”), certify that; (1)I have reviewed this quarterlyl Report on Form 10-Q of the Registrant;(2)Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;(3)Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;(4)I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) for the Registrant and have:a)Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under my supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the Registrant is made known to me by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;b)Evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report my conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; andc)Disclosed in this report any change in the Registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the Registrant's most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and(5)I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of the internal control over financial reporting, to the Registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of Registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):a)All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; andb)Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.  December 17, 2012/s/Alexandre FrigonBy:Alexandre FrigonPresident, CEOand Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 10.14

 

To: CEO and CBO

Adaptimmune Limited

91 Milton Park

Abingdon

Oxfordshire

OX14 4RY

 

Date: 12th September 2016

 

Dear Sirs

 

Re: Agreement to terminated the Target Collaboration Deed dated 28 January 2015

 

This letter confirms the agreement of both Immunocore Limited and Adaptimmune Limited to terminate the Target Collaboration Deed entered into between them and dated 28 January 2015. Such mutually agreed termination shall become effective as of 1 March 2017 and up until such date, the terms of the Target Collaboration Deed shall continue in full force and effect.

 

The Parties also agree and confirm that the following clauses shall continue in full force and effect following termination of the Deed: 1(to the extent necessary for interpretation of surviving provisions), 2, 3.1, 3.3, 3.4, 3.5, 4.8, 4.9, 4.10, 5.1, 5.4.4, 6 (including the licences granted in clause 6.4A), 7 (to the extent any payment obligation remains outstanding), 9, 11.6, 13, 14, 21 (to the extent necessary for interpretation and enforcement or surviving terms).

 

Other agreements between Immunocore Limited and Adaptimmune Limited shall remain unaffected by the termination of the Target Collaboration Deed. This letter shall become effective on the date of signature by and on behalf of Adaptimmune Limited below.

 

	
Yours   faithfully
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
/s/ Eliot Forster
    	
 
    


 

On behalf of Immunocore Limited

 

Confirmed and agreed by Adaptimmune Limited

 

	
Signed   by:
    	
/s/ James   Noble 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
James   Noble, CEO
    	
 
    
	
Date: 8   November 2016
    	
 
    
	
On behalf   of Adaptimmune Limited
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                          10,222
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  420,658
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (80,000)
<INVENTORY>                                  1,170,017
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,573,731
<PP&E>                                         474,743
<DEPRECIATION>                                 296,713
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,842,843
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        5,516,231
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        28,836
<OTHER-SE>                                 (3,702,224)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,842,843
<SALES>                                     10,564,056
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            10,674,879
<CGS>                                        9,145,359
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               14,102,764
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               278,637
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             168,606
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (3,875,178)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (3,875,178)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (3,875,178)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (1.38)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.38)
        

</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 164 (Thursday, August 23, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Page 42673]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-18177]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute on Aging; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute on Aging Initial Review 
Group, Behavior and Social Science of Aging Review Committee, NIA-S.
    Date: September 27-28, 2018.
    Time: 2:00 p.m. to 5:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: Bethesda Marriott, 5151 Pooks Hill Rd., Bethesda, MD 
20814.
    Contact Person: Carmen, Ph.D. Moten, Scientific Review Officer, 
National Cancer Institute, 6116 Executive Blvd., Suite 602, MSC 
8341, Rockville, MD 20852-8341, 301-496-8589, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#b7d4dad8c3d2d9f7dad6dedb99d9dedf99d0d8c1"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="1f7c72706b7a715f727e76733171767731787069">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.866, Aging 
Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: August 17, 2018.
Melanie J. Pantoja,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2018-18177 Filed 8-22-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### F. W. WOOLWORTH COMPANY, a foreign corporation, Appellant, v. Mary E. TRAYLOR and Joseph Traylor, her husband, Appellees.

No. 1026.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Fourth District.

Jan. 17, 1968.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.