alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2016310EN.01009301.xml

| 25.8.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 310/93 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.8.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 310/93

---

P8_TA(2015)0022

The accession of Seychelles to the 1980 Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction *

European Parliament legislative resolution of 11 February 2015 on the proposal for a Council decision on the declaration of acceptance by the Member States, in the interest of the European Union, of the accession of Seychelles to the 1980 Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction (COM(2011)0909 — C8-0265/2014 — 2011/0444(NLE))

(Consultation)

(2016/C 310/19)

The European Parliament,

The European Parliament

| — | having regard to the proposal for a Council decision (COM(2011)0909), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the proposal for a Council decision (COM(2011)0909),

| — | having regard to Article 38, fourth paragraph, of the 1980 Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction, |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to Article 38, fourth paragraph, of the 1980 Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction,

| — | having regard to Article 81(3) and Article 218(6), second subparagraph, point (b), of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament (C8-0265/2014), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to Article 81(3) and Article 218(6), second subparagraph, point (b), of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament (C8-0265/2014),

| — | having regard to the opinion of the Court of Justice of 14 October 2014, |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the opinion of the Court of Justice of 14 October 2014,

| — | having regard to Rules 59 and 108(7) of its Rules of Procedure, |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to Rules 59 and 108(7) of its Rules of Procedure,

| — | having regard to the report of the Committee on Legal Affairs (A8-0006/2015), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the report of the Committee on Legal Affairs (A8-0006/2015),

| 1. | Approves the proposal for a Council decision and approves the acceptance of the accession; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Approves the proposal for a Council decision and approves the acceptance of the accession;

| 2. | Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council, the Commission and the governments and parliaments of the Member States and of Seychelles. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council, the Commission and the governments and parliaments of the Member States and of Seychelles.

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE BALANCE
SHEET AND THE STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2000 AND
IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS. THE SIX
MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 1999 HAVE BEEN RESTATED TO REFLECT THE EFFECT OF THE
ACQUISITIONS OF BALR AND FOUR POINTS ACCOUNTED FOR AS A POOLING-OF-INTERESTS
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED>
<CIK> 0001009403
<NAME> MARCHFIRST
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                          65,389
<SECURITIES>                                    65,716
<RECEIVABLES>                                   72,932
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,546
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               212,160
<PP&E>                                          66,323
<DEPRECIATION>                                  13,106
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 296,100
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           44,325
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            57
<OTHER-SE>                                     249,010
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   296,100
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               224,690
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  126,700
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                77,975
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 23,391
<INCOME-TAX>                                    10,433
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             12,958
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    12,958
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.23
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.21


</TABLE>
RECH/Vi 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION ' ' j ^ y ^-^ 

FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION ^''^ 

^^OCKPT 

In the Matter of: 

FAA Docket No. CP09NM0010 

Federal Express Corporation, FAA Case No. 2007NM700156 

Respondent 

Judge Goodwin 

fppi <3J&0^'C>7X/ 

RESPONDENT'S RESPONSE TO ADMINISTRATOR'S MOTION TO 

RESCHEDULE HEARING 

Federal Express Corporation, by and through its attorneys, and pursuant to section 

13.218 of the Federal Aviation Administration's Rules of Practice in Civil Penalty 

Proceedings, 14 CFR § 13.218, files this Response to the Administrator's Motion to 

Reschedule Hearing, and in support thereof states: 

1. On May 26, 2010, Judge Goodwin issued an order setting the hearing for the 

above case on July 27 and 28, 2010. 

2. On June 1,2010, the Administrator filed a motion seeking to reschedule the 

hearing due to a scheduling conflict of its primary witness. 

3. Witnesses and attorneys for Federal Express Corporation are available 

August 2"^* through August 13*. 

WHEREFORE, Federal Express Corporation respectfully requests that the Court 

reschedule the hearing at a time that the witnesses and attorneys for Federal Express 

Corporation are available. 
Respectfully submitted, 

FEDERAL EXPRESS CORPORATION 

Courtney E. Felts 

Senior Attorney, Regulatory Affairs 

3620 Hacks Cross Road, Building B, 3"^ Floor 

Memphis, TlSf 38125 

(901) 434-8632 

(901) 434-8283 FAX 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I hereby certify that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was forwarded via 

FedEx Overnight delivery on the M ' day of June, 2010 to: 

The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin, Administrative Law Judge 

Office of Hearings, M-20 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE 

East Building Ground Floor, Room E12-320 

Washington, DC 20590 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, SW 

Wilbur Wright Building, Suite 2W1000 

Washington, DC 20591 

Attn: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Mr. James Conneely 

Attorney 

Federal Aviation Administration 

Office of the Chief Counsel 

Enforcement Division, AGC-30 

800 Independence Avenue, SW 

Room912-C 

Washington, DC 20591 
Lawrence W. Bierlein 

1101 30th Street, NW, Suite 500 

Washington, DC 20007 

(202) 625-8355 

(202) 625-4363 FAX 

Courtney E. Felts
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3342 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3342

To establish a toll free number in the Department of Commerce to assist 
        consumers in determining if products are American-made.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 21, 1993

Mr. Traficant introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                    Committee on Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To establish a toll free number in the Department of Commerce to assist 
        consumers in determining if products are American-made.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ESTABLISHMENT OF TOLL FREE NUMBER.

    (a) Establishment.--Within 180 days of the date of the enactment of 
this Act, the Secretary of Commerce shall establish a toll free number 
which may be used by consumers--
            (1) to determine if a product is made in America, and
            (2) learn where products may be purchased or learn a 
        telephone number which will provide information on the purchase 
        of products.
The Secretary shall publish the number in the Federal Register and 
undertake such outreach activities as may be appropriate to publicize 
the number.
    (b) Use.--Consumers who use the toll free number shall be informed 
that the product list is not complete but is derived from registrations 
under section 2.

SEC. 2. REGISTRATION.

    The Secretary of Commerce shall establish a procedure under which 
the manufacturer of a product which is made in America may register 
with the Secretary and have such product included in the information 
available through the toll free number established under section 1.

SEC. 3. PENALTY.

    Any manufacturer of a product who registers a product with the 
Secretary of Commerce under section 2 which is not made in America may 
not offer such product for purchase by the Federal Government and shall 
be subject to prosecution under section 5 of the Federal Trade 
Commission Act for making a deceptive claim.

SEC. 4. DEFINITION.

    For purposes of this Act, the term ``made in America'' means--
            (1) an unmanufactured end product mined or produced in the 
        United States, or
            (2) an end product manufactured in the United States if the 
        cost of its components mined, produced, or manufactured in the 
        United States exceeds 50 percent of the cost of all of its 
        components.

                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of
ETFS Asian Gold Trust (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on May 13, 2011 (the “Report”), the undersigned, in the capacity and on the date indicated
below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements
of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

|Date:   May 13, 2011                                                                                                                             |  | /s/  Thomas Quigley                                           
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ |  | --------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                                                                 |  | Thomas Quigley                                                
|                                                                                                                                                 |  | Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer                         
|                                                                                                                                                 |  | (Principal Financial Officer and Principal
Accounting Officer)
|                                                                                                                                                 |  |                                                               
|*   The Registrant is a trust and Mr. Quigley is signing in his capacity as an officer of ETF Securities USA LLC, the Sponsor of the Registrant.











---
#### BUZZY’S OF MIAMI, INC., a Florida corporation, Appellant, v. C. V. MITCHELL, etc., et al., Appellees.

No. 70-1235.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

May 3, 1971.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed.
### THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13

- 21

- 00192

- CR

James Charles Baker v. The State of Texas
On Appeal from the 156th District Court of Bee County , Texas Trial Court Cause No. B

- 20

- 2061

- 0

- CR

- B

JUDGMENT THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considere d this cause on appeal, concludes that the judgment of the trial court should be affirmed . The Court orders the judgment of the trial court AFFIRMED

. We further order this decision certified below for observance. April 14, 2022
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 3638

To suspend temporarily the duty on mycophenolate mofetil.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

NOVEMBER 22, 1993

Ms. ESHOO introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee

on Ways and Means

A BILL

To suspend temporarily the duty on mycophenolate mofetil.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. MYCOPHENOLATE MOFETIL

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following

7 new heading:

‘‘ 9902. . Mycophenolate

mofetil in bulk

form (CAS NO.

115007–34–6)

(provided for in

subheading

2934.90.25) ...... Free No change No change On or before

12/31/93 ’’.
2

HR 3638 IH

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by

2 subsection (a) applies with respect to articles entered, or

3 withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after

4 the 15th day after the date of enactment of this Act.

Æ
#### LYKES BROTHERS, Employer, and Hartford Insurance Group, Carrier, Petitioners, v. Charlie MURPHY, Claimant, and Industrial Relations Commission, Respondent.

No. 43508.

Supreme Court of Florida.

May 22, 1973.

Certiorari denied.

ROBERTS, Acting C. J., and ERVIN, ADKINS, BOYD and McCAIN, JJ., concur in denial of petition for writ of certi-orari.

ERVIN, ADKINS, BOYD and McCAIN concur in granting of petition for attorney’s fee.

ROBERTS, Acting, C. J., would deny the petition for attorney’s fee.
# C_2015382EN.01000101.xml

| 17.11.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 382/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.11.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 382/1

---

Notice for the attention of the persons subject to restrictive measures provided for in Council Decision 2011/72/CFSP and in Council Regulation (EU) No 101/2011 concerning restrictive measures directed against certain persons and entities in view of the situation in Tunisia

(2015/C 382/01)

The following information is brought to the attention of the persons listed in the Annex to Council Decision 2011/72/CFSP (1) and in Annex I to Council Regulation (EU) No 101/2011 (2) concerning restrictive measures directed against certain persons and entities in view of the situation in Tunisia.

1

2

Following a review, the Council of the European Union has concluded that the above-mentioned persons should continue to be included on the list of designated persons.

The persons concerned may submit a request to the Council, together with supporting documents, that the decision to include them on the list of designated persons should be reconsidered. Any such request should be presented before 1 December 2015 and sent to the following address:

| Council of the European Union |
| --- |
| General Secretariat |
| DG C 1C |
| Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175 |
| 1048 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |
| E-mail: sanctions@consilium.europa.eu |

Council of the European Union

General Secretariat

DG C 1C

Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175

1048 Bruxelles/Brussel

BELGIQUE/BELGIË

E-mail: sanctions@consilium.europa.eu

Any observations received will be taken into account for the purpose of the Council’s periodic review, pursuant to Article 5 of Decision 2011/72/CFSP and Article 12(4) of Regulation (EU) No 101/2011, of the list of designated persons.

---

(1)  OJ L 28, 2.2.2011, p. 62.

1

(2)  OJ L 31, 5.2.2011, p. 1.

2

---
#### Richard G. RECKNER, Appellant, v. FREEPORT RIDGE ESTATES, LTD., et al., Appellees.

No. 70-1285.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

May 3, 1971.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed.
EXHIBIT 10.2

[*] CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT REQUESTED. THE REDACTED MATERIAL HAS BEEN FILED SEPARATELY WITH THE COMMISSION.

Amendment No. 1  to  Nonexclusive License Agreement

This Amendment No. 1 (this "Amendment") is entered into by and between AnorMED, Inc., a corporation doing business in British Columbia, Canada
("ANORMED"), and North American Scientific, Inc., organized and existing under the laws of Delaware ("LICENSEE") as of February 14, 2002.

1.0    Recitals.

1.1  WHEREAS,
ANORMED and LICENSEE are parties to a Nonexclusive License Agreement with an effective date of July 20, 2001 (the "Agreement").

1.2  WHEREAS,
ANORMED has given notice of termination of its license to [*] under which [*] had certain license rights to use
ANORMED's linker technology forin vivodiagnosis of cancer in mammals.

1.3  WHEREAS,
LICENSEE desires to increase the field of the license granted to LICENSEE by ANORMED pursuant to the Agreement and ANORMED is willing to amend the Agreement,
upon the terms and conditions set forth herein.

NOW,
THEREFORE, for good and valuable consideration, the parties agree as follows:

2.0    Amendment of FIELD OF USE.

Article 2.3 of the Agreement shall be amended to read in its entirety as follows:



3.0    Third Party Royalties.

Article 8.5 entitled "Third Party Royalties" shall be deleted in its entirety and Article 9.1(d) shall be deleted.

4.0    Full Force and Effect.

Except as amended and modified by this Amendment, the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect.

---

IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, ANORMED and LICENSEE have executed this Amendment, in duplicate originals but collectively evidencing only a single amendment, by their respective duly authorized
officers, as of the date first above written.

|North American Scientific, Inc. |                      | AnorMED, INC.               |    
|------------------------------- | -------------------- | --------------------------- | ---
|                                |                      |                             |    
|By:                             | /s/L. MICHAEL CUTRER |                             | By:
|                                | Name:
Title:         | L. Michael Cutrer President |    
|                                |                      |                             |    
|                                |                      |                             |    

[*] CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT REQUESTED. THE REDACTED MATERIAL HAS BEEN FILED SEPARATELY WITH THE COMMISSION.

2

---

QuickLinks
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Island Radio, Inc. (“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the interim period ended June 30, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (“Report”), I, Eric Boyer, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge and belief:

1.

The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: August 11, 2011

By: 

/s/ Eric Boyer                                                

Eric Boyer

President, Chief Executive Officer, 

Principal Executive Officer and Director
# C_2015080EN.01000501.xml

| 7.3.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 80/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.3.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 80/5

---

Opinion of the Advisory Committee on restrictive agreements and dominant position given at its meeting of 17 June 2013 regarding a draft decision relating to Case C.39226 (2) — Lundbeck

Rapporteur: Czech Republic

(2015/C 80/05)

| 1. | The Advisory Committee agrees with the Commission that fines should be imposed on the addressees of the draft decision. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The Advisory Committee agrees with the Commission that fines should be imposed on the addressees of the draft decision.

| 2. | The Advisory Committee agrees with the Commission on the basic amounts of the fines for Lundbeck. |
| --- | --- |

2.

The Advisory Committee agrees with the Commission on the basic amounts of the fines for Lundbeck.

| 3. | The Advisory Committee agrees with the Commission that Lundbeck should be given a 10 % reduction of the basic amount in view of the long duration of the investigation. A minority disagrees. |
| --- | --- |

3.

The Advisory Committee agrees with the Commission that Lundbeck should be given a 10 % reduction of the basic amount in view of the long duration of the investigation. A minority disagrees.

| 4. | The Advisory Committee agrees with the Commission on the final amounts of the fines for Lundbeck. A minority abstains. |
| --- | --- |

4.

The Advisory Committee agrees with the Commission on the final amounts of the fines for Lundbeck. A minority abstains.

| 5. | The Advisory Committee agrees with the Commission’s approach to base the calculation of fines for the generic undertakings on the value transferred. |
| --- | --- |

5.

The Advisory Committee agrees with the Commission’s approach to base the calculation of fines for the generic undertakings on the value transferred.

| 6. | The Advisory Committee agrees with the Commission that the generic undertakings should be given a 10 % reduction in view of the long duration of the investigation. A minority disagrees. |
| --- | --- |

6.

The Advisory Committee agrees with the Commission that the generic undertakings should be given a 10 % reduction in view of the long duration of the investigation. A minority disagrees.

| 7. | The Advisory Committee agrees with the Commission on the final amounts of the fines for the generic undertakings. A minority abstains. |
| --- | --- |

7.

The Advisory Committee agrees with the Commission on the final amounts of the fines for the generic undertakings. A minority abstains.

| 8. | The Advisory Committee agrees with the Commission to reject the inability to pay request made in this case. |
| --- | --- |

8.

The Advisory Committee agrees with the Commission to reject the inability to pay request made in this case.

| 9. | The Advisory Committee recommends the publication of its opinion in the Official Journal of the European Union. |
| --- | --- |

9.

The Advisory Committee recommends the publication of its opinion in the Official Journal of the European Union.

Official Journal of the European Union

---
# C_2015367EN.01000902.xml

| 5.11.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 367/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.11.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 367/9

---

EUROPOL

Publication of the final accounts for the financial year 2014

(2015/C 367/33)

The complete version of the final accounts may be found at the following address:

https://www.europol.europa.eu/search/apachesolr_search/annual%20accounts

---