alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Johanna KAUFMANN and Robert J. Kaufmann, her husband, Appellants. v. CAPITAL FLEETS OF FLORIDA, INC., a Florida corporation, Appellee.

No. 67-94.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Third District.

Feb. 13, 1968.

Rehearing Denied March 13, 1968.

Richard H. W. Maloy, Coral Gables, Highsmith, Ezzo & Brennan, Miami, for appellants.

Dean, Adams, George & Wood and David L. Willing, Jeanne Heyward, Miami, for appellee.

Before PEARSON, BARKDULL and HENDRY, JJ.

*300PER CURIAM.

Affirmed upon the authority of Lykes Brothers, Inc. v. Singletary, Fla.App.1966, 190 So.2d 589; Grant v. Williams, Fla.App.1966, 190 So.2d 23; Cloud v. Fallís, Fla.1959, 110 So.2d 669.
**EXHIBIT 32.02**

 

**Section 1350 Certification**

 

In connection with this quarterly report of Man AHL FuturesAccess LLC (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (this “Report”), I, Barbra E. Kocsis, Chief Financial Officer of Merrill Lynch Alternative Investments LLC, the manager of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

1. This Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2. The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 

Date:  March 13, 2011

 

 
| By:    | /s/   BARBRA E. KOCSIS                         |   |
|--------|------------------------------------------------|--------|
|   | Barbra   E. Kocsis                             |   |
|   | Chief   Financial Officer                      |   |
|   | (Principal   Financial and Accounting Officer) |   |

 

----
EXHIBIT 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of The Dixie Group, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the period ended December 29, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Gary A. Harmon, the Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:



(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



/s/GARY A. HARMON

Gary A. Harmon, Chief Financial Officer
Date:    March 4, 2008



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to The Dixie Group, Inc. and will be retained by The Dixie Group, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
# C_2015253EN.01000501.xml

| 1.8.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 253/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.8.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 253/5

---

Notice for the attention of persons and entities subject to the restrictive measures provided for in Council Decision (CFSP) 2015/1333 and in Council Regulation (EU) No 204/2011 concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Libya

(2015/C 253/04)

The following information is brought to the attention of the persons and entities designated in Annexes II and IV to Council Decision (CFSP) 2015/1333 (1) and in Annex III to Council Regulation (EU) No 204/2011 (2), as implemented by Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/1323 (3) implementing Article 16(2) of Regulation (EU) No 204/2011, concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Libya.

1

2

3

The Council of the European Union, after having reviewed the list of persons and entities designated in the above-mentioned Annexes, has determined that the restrictive measures provided for in Council Decision 2011/137/CFSP (4) and in Regulation (EU) No 204/2011 should continue to apply to those persons and entities.

4

The attention of the persons and entities concerned is drawn to the possibility of making an application to the competent authorities of the relevant Member State(s) as indicated on the websites in Annex IV to Regulation (EU) No 204/2011, in order to obtain an authorisation to use frozen funds for basic needs or specific payments (cf. Article 7 of the Regulation).

The persons and entities concerned may submit a request to the Council before 1 June 2016, together with supporting documentation, that the decision to include them on the above-mentioned list should be reconsidered. Any such request should be sent to the following address:

before 1 June 2016

| Council of the European Union |
| --- |
| General Secretariat |
| DGC 1C |
| Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175 |
| 1048 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |
| Email: sanctions@consilium.europa.eu |

Council of the European Union

General Secretariat

DGC 1C

Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175

1048 Bruxelles/Brussel

BELGIQUE/BELGIË

Email: sanctions@consilium.europa.eu

Any observations received will be taken into account for the purpose of the Council's next review, pursuant to Article 12(2) of Decision 2011/137/CFSP and Article 16(6) of Regulation (EU) No 204/2011, of the list of designated persons and entities.

---

(1)  OJ L 206, 1.8.2015, p. 34.

1

(2)  OJ L 58, 3.3.2011, p. 1.

2

(3)  OJ L 206, 1.8.2015, p. 4.

3

(4)  OJ L 58, 3.3.2011, p. 53.

4

---
#### Cheryl PEACOCK, Appellant, v. Jerry E. PEACOCK, Appellee.

No. J-240.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. First District.

Feb. 22, 1968.

*293Ernest C. Wimberly, Fort Walton Beach, for appellant.

Ferrin C. Campbell, of Campbell & Rice, Crestview, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff has appealed a final decree granting to her defendant husband a divorce on the ground of cruelty alleged in his counterclaim. Her assault is confined exclusively to the contention that the evidence is insufficient to support the findings and conclusions of the chancellor upon which the decree is premised.

At the time of final hearing plaintiff abandoned her complaint seeking a divorce and advised her attorney that she would not appear at the final hearing, nor would she offer any evidence in support of her answer to the counterclaim filed by defendant. The only testimony and evidence before the court was that adduced by defendant in support of the cause of action alleged in his counterclaim.

From a review of the record it affirmatively appears that while defendant was a member of the armed forces of this country and stationed on a United States Navy ship, plaintiff instituted this action for divorce against him. Shortly thereafter he returned home on leave but plaintiff, then residing with her parents, not only refused to see him but refused to permit him to see and visit their child who was born during his absence. He remained home on leave for a period of some twenty days and through telephone conversations attempted on many occasions to see his wife and child, but in each instance was rebuffed. There was testimony as to the effect such actions on the part of plaintiff had on the physical and mental well-being of defendant. Upon this evidence the chancellor concluded that the allegations of cruelty by plaintiff to defendant had been sufficiently established, and upon such conclusion granted the decree of divorce.

In reviewing a judgment rendered in a nonjury case it is not the function of an appellate court to substitute its judgment for that of the trial judge.1 If the findings of the court are supported by substantial and competent evidence, the conclusions based thereon will not be set aside unless appellant clearly demonstrates that substantial error was committed or that the conclu*294sions are erroneous under the evidence.2 Where the evidence is heard by the trial judge and the witnesses are before him, his findings are accorded great weight and should not be disturbed except upon a clear showing of abuse of discretion.3

Appellant having failed to clearly demonstrate error, the decree appealed is affirmed.

WIGGINTON, C. J., and JOHNSON and SPECTOR, JJ., concur.

1

. Cherney v. Cherney (Fla.App.1962), 146 So.2d 914.

2

. Hieber v. Hieber (Fla.App.1963), 151 So.2d 646.

3

. Bargeon v. Bargeon (Fla.App.1963), 153 So.2d 10.
# C_2015290EN.01001001.xml

| 4.9.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 290/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.9.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 290/10

---

Types of gas and the corresponding supply pressures according to Article 2(2) of Directive 2009/142/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council relating to appliances burning gaseous fuels (codified version)

(2015/C 290/05)

(This publication is based on information received by the Commission services from the Member States)

(This publication is based on information received by the Commission services from the Member States)

| Country | Gas family | Wobbe index (gross) in | Supply pressure in mbar |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| MJ/m3 or kWh/m3

  (0 °C) | MJ/m3 or kWh/m3

  (15 °C) | min. | nom. | max. |
| SWEDEN | FIRST | 22,4-24,8 MJ/m3 | | 6 | 8 | 15 |
| SECOND | 51,9-55,8 MJ/m3 | | 17 | 20 | 25 |
| THIRD | 75,1-81,3 MJ/m3 | | 25 | 30 | 35 |

Country

Gas family

Wobbe index (gross) in

Supply pressure in mbar

MJ/m3 or kWh/m3

3

3

(0 °C)

MJ/m3 or kWh/m3

3

3

(15 °C)

min.

nom.

max.

SWEDEN

FIRST

22,4-24,8 MJ/m3

3

6

8

15

SECOND

51,9-55,8 MJ/m3

3

17

20

25

THIRD

75,1-81,3 MJ/m3

3

25

30

35

---
Motion Granted; Appeal Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed October

11, 2022.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14-22-00071-CV

SHAVE HQ, LLC, ARTIC PEACOCK, LLC AND IDOWU NTOKA, 

Appellants

V.

LJ PARKWAY, LLC, Appellee

On Appeal from the 458th District Court

Fort Bend County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 20-DCV-271585

MEMORANDUM OPINION

This is an appeal from a judgment signed January 7, 2022. On September 

30, 2022, appellants filed a motion to dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1. 

The motion is granted. 

We dismiss the appeal.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Christopher and Justices Wise and Hassan.
Exhibit 32.1


Section 906 Certification


of Travis T. Prentice (President and CEO)














CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of MACC Private Equities Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended September 30, 2010, as filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Travis T. Prentice, President and CEO of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)           The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(2)           The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.











/s/ Travis T. Prentice


Travis T. Prentice,


President and CEO








Date: December 29, 2010
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 10**  **- 7635** 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,
v. CLIFTON ERVIN MCLEAN , Defendant

- Appellant
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Easter n District of Virginia , at Alexandria
. Gerald Bruce Lee , District Judge. ( 1:05

- cr - 00254

- GBL

- 1; 1:09

- cv - 01028

- GBL )

Submitted : February 10, 2011 Decided: February 23, 2011

Before WILKINSON and DAVIS , Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Jud ge.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion
. Clifton Ervin McLean, Appellant Pro Se. Erik R. Barnett, Assistant United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CUR IAM: Clifton Ervin McLean seeks to appeal the district court’s order treating his Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) motion as a successive 28 U.S.C. A. § 2255 ( West Supp. 2010 ) motion, and dismissing it on that basis. The order is not appealable unless a circuit just ice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2006) ; Reid v. Angelone , 369 F.3d 363, 369 (4th Cir. 2004). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006)
. When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or w rong. Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller

- El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336

- 38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable , and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack , 529 U.S. at 484

- 85. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that
McLean has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal.3 Additionally, we construe McLean ’s notice of appeal and informal brief as an application to file a second or successive § 2255 motion. United States v. Winestock , 340 F.3d 200, 208 (4th Cir. 2003). In order to obt ain authorization to file a successive § 2255 motion, a prisoner must assert claims based on either: (1) newly discovered evidence, not previously discoverable by due diligence, that would be sufficient to establish by clear and convincing evidence that, b ut for constitutional error, no reasonable factfinder would have found the movant guilty of the offense; or (2) a new rule of constitutional law, previously unavailable, made retroactive by the Supreme Court to cases on collateral review. 28 U.S.C. A. § 22 55(h ) (West Supp. 2010)
. McLean ’s claims do not satisfy either of these criteria. Therefore, we deny authorization to fi le a successive § 2255 motion. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process. DISMISSED
EXHIBIT 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. {section} 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Summer Highlands Limited (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending December 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Jeremy Mork, Chief Executive and Financial  Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. {section} 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes- Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



|Dated:  April 25, 2011
By  /s/ Jeremy Mork
-----------------------------
    Jeremy Mork
    Chief Executive and  Financial Officer
   (Principal Executive and Financial Officer)
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
| 1.     | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                |
|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                                                                                                                                 |
| 2.     | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |

|            |   |                                             |
|-----------------|--------|--------------------------------------------------|
|            |   |                                             |   |
|            | By:    | /s/ Valeria Stringer                        |   |
| August 22, 2011 |   | President, Director, Principal Financial Officer |   |
|            |   |                                             |   |
|            |   |                                             |
Mart i

in , Michae l (OST ) Do \ -QST-
. H^ T- 57^ H Subject : FW: Decision o n Commercial Airlin e Servic e fo rAugusta , Mato

e nOFPATlflW^

^ 

### m m ^ 2\ A

### AI h 1 2 From : Dean , Joh n C [mailto:John.C.Dean@maine.gov ] Sent : Wednesday

, September22 , 201 0 2:4

0 P M To : dennis.devane@dot.gov; Martin , Michael (OST) ; dennis.devane@dot.go v Subject : Decision on Commercia l Airlin e Servic

e fo rAugusta , Maine Greetings , Yesterday , Ja yBradsha wan d I ha d a length ydiscussio n regardin g th e decisio n t o chang e th e ai rcarrie rservin g th e Augusta , Main e airport
. Subsequen t t o ou rconversation
. Ja ysen tyou th e e-mai l belo wan d copie d me . I was goin g t o sen d a simila rmessag e bu t I thin k I wil l simpl yech o th e point s tha t Ja ymade
. I n m ywork , I a m aske d t o spea k a t event s aroun d th e countr yan d sometime s internationally
. I n addition , I serv e o n th e boar d o fdirector s o fa coupl e o fnationa l organizations , an d I hav e bee n th e presiden t o fon e o fth e organizations
. Servin g i n thes e position s require s a fai r amoun t o fai rtrave l and , sinc e m yoffic e i s i n August a an d I liv e i n Winthrop , I fl you t o f August a as ofte n a s I can . Alo t o fm ytrave l take s m e t o Washington , DC
. Flyin g U S Airway s o n Colga n i s ver yconvenien t becaus e I ca n simpl yg o fro m on e gat e (usuall y7 ) t o th e gat e tha t serve s th e hourl yDC shuttl e (usuall ygat e 16,17 , o r18)
. I hav e joke d tha t i t i s s o convenient , an d I hav e don e i t s o often , tha t I thin k I coul d g o fro m on e gat e t o th e othe rwit h m yeye s closed
. I understan d tha t th e propose d newservic e woul d no t b e tha t convenien t a t all , an d tha t I wil l hav e t o trave l t o a differen t termina l t o connec t t o U S Airways
. I hop e that , as yo u revie wthi s importan t decision , you wil l tak e int o consideratio n howthi s wil l affec t thos e o fu s wh o trave l i n an d ou t o fAugusta
. I als o hop e tha t you wil l tak e int o consideratio n th e conflic t o finteres t issu e tha t ha s bee n raised
.

Joh n C
. Dea n Stat e Fir e Marsha l 5 2 Stat e Hous e Statio n Augusta , Main e 04333-005 2 20 7 626-387 0
| 1.   | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|----------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2.   | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the consolidated financial condition of the Company as of the dates presented and the consolidated result of operations of the Company for the periods presented. |
|----------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   By: |   /s/ Phillip Stromer                                            |
|-----------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|  Name:     |  Phillip Stromer                                                      |
|  Title:    |  Principal Executive Officer,Principal Financial Officer and Director |
|  Date:     |  November 29, 2010                                                    |
EXHIBIT 32

<PAGE>


     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Colorado Ceramic Tile, Inc. (the
"Company")  on Form 10-Q for the period  ending  December 31, 2011 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange  Commission  (the  "Report"),  Sandie  Venezia,  the
Principal Executive and Financial Officer of the Company, certifies, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to the best of her knowledge:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
     respects the financial condition and results of the Company.


February 14, 2012                     By /s/ Sandie Venezia
                                         ---------------------------------
                                         Sandie Venezia, Principal Executive and
                                         Financial Officer
<PAGE>
#### STATE of Florida ex rel. Otho VAUGHN, Relator, v. Honorable D. C. SMITH, Circuit Judge, Respondent.

No. 73-819.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

July 19, 1973.

Prohibition denied.
Exhibit 32





CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE AND FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Omri Amos Shalom, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the quarterly report of Top Gear Inc. on Form 10-Q for the three months ended March 31, 2011 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such quarterly report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of Top Gear Inc. as of and for the periods presented in such quarterly report on Form 10-Q. This written statement is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission as an exhibit accompanying such quarterly report and shall not be deemed filed pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.





By:
/s/  Omri Amos ShalomName: Omri Amos ShalomTitle: Chief Executive and Financial Officer





Date: May 12, 2011