alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned certifies
that to the best of his knowledge (1) this Quarterly Report of Corporate Capital Trust, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2017, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (this Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and (2) the information contained in this Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition of the Company as of March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016 and its results of operations for the period ended March 31, 2017.



|                   |  |  |  |     |  |                       |  |                                                                                       
|------------------ |  |  |  | --- |  | --------------------- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                   |  |  |  |    
|                   |  |  | 
|Date: May 12, 2017 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/ Thomas K. Sittema
|                   |  |  |  |     |  |                       |  | Thomas K. Sittema Chief Executive
Officer (Principal Executive Officer)               
|                   |  |  |  |    
|                   |  |  | 
|Date: May 12, 2017 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/ Chirag J. Bhavsar
|                   |  |  |  |     |  |                       |  | Chirag J. Bhavsar Chief Financial
Officer (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Michael M. LACOUR.

No. 60405.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Oct. 28, 1977.

In re: Michael M. Lacour applying for writ of review and for a stay order.

Writ denied. No merit in relator’s assignments of error.
EXHIBIT 32.2





CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER





PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)





In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2018 (the “Report”) of New Mountain Finance Corporation (the “Registrant”), as filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Shiraz Y. Kajee, the Chief Financial Officer of the Registrant, hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge, that:





|    |                                                                                                                                  
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

|    |                                                                                                                                                        
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.




/s/ SHIRAZ Y. KAJEEName:Shiraz Y. KajeeDate:November 7, 2018
#### GRAND UNION COMPANY v. SUTTER.

No. 39383.

Supreme Court of Florida.

March 1970.

Certiorari denied without opinion. 230 So.2d 478.
### SERVE D SEPTEMBE R23 , 201 0 U.S . DEPARTMEN

T O F TRANSPORTATION 'SMSPolm' S OFFICE O

F HEARINGS y'r r npEp/^JIQM

S WASHINGTON , DC 

### m-E P 

### 2 U A S : 2 8 I N TH E MATTE RO F FEDERA L EXPRES S CORPORATIO N FA A DOCKE

T NO . CP10NM000 8 (Civi l Penalt

y Action ) DM S NO . FAA-2010-079 2 NOTIC E OF ASSIGNMEN T OF PROCEEDIN G Thi s proceedin g (heretofor

e designate dCas e No . 2008NM700280 ) ha s been assigne dt o Administrativ e La

w Judg e Richar

dC . Goodwin . All futur

e pleading s an

dothe r communication s regarding thi s proceedin g shall b e servedon th e Judge , th e FA A Hearin g Docket , an

dth e othe r person s on th e attache dservic e list . S O ORDERED .

[onni e A . Yode r Chief Administrativ e La

w Jud £ Attachmen t - Servic e Lis t

## m^'' ^ > ' i:m ^ At«/.<F4ADoote(^te|PiO J (Civi l Peni^tyli^«% )



### ^ V <^ . OR I |H«ffiiig.©ocke

t fpe^re i Aviatio n Administratio n 180 0 Indqi^adeaic e Avenue , S.W . toluDC 2059 1 ^Atta ; tfen g Docke t

Clerk , AGC-4 3 ' Vilbvt

t Wrigh t Buildin g - Suit

e |W|f(0O ^ li dJ . Btonczek , President '«de« dl^j^ s Corporation , Responde i W y Cod e 7622 , Bld g 0,2"''Floo r 1 l^ ^ i^Jc s Cros s Roa d H» * Floo r : M 3812 5 'MS ' ler-SneU,i?e«7ondenr' s i llStpJtes s Corporatio n rXHvisio n I H«C( b Gros s Road l|i3 ^ Floo r Iwapbis^T N 3812 5 901-434-836 1 tAX : ^1-434-828 3

. ;CK$ltR,l4yoms , Complainant' s Counsel

* "wi n Administeation lijuntaii i Region , ANM>-

7 | .hyn^wJ^^^EWfr^-yi*^" ) 6atl^Bfenue,S.W . 1 •i^>C^^805 7 ^

, : 4:^5-^7-141 7 ' ^ \4:15^7-100 7 'Sfltvi W wa s b y U.S . Mail . Fo

r servic e | i pemw n o r b y tHq^t^^^vsi^ * ^ ^ ^ ' Ij ^ AdQilmstration

, 60 0 lnd6peBde| » Av«» ^ $;W.^^m»Wti| ^ Biii i '•tC 20591 , Atteation : HearingDo4etCUsik,'A0O4^0 .
O R D E R

Upon consideration of the Joint Petition for Reprimand filed by the Petitioner, the 

Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland, and Respondent, Celestine Tatung, on 

August 9, 2023, in the above-captioned case, in which the parties advise that the 

Respondent agrees that his conduct, as described in the Joint Petition, violated Rule 1.15 

(safekeeping property) of the District of Columbia Rules of Professional Conduct and 

Federal Immigration Rules of Professional Conduct of Practitioners, 8 C.F.R. §

1003.102(n) (conduct prejudicial to the administration of justice), (q)(1) and (2) 

(diligence), and (r)(1)-(3) (communication) and that the Respondent consents to a 

reprimand, it is this 15th day of August 2023

ORDERED, by the Supreme Court of Maryland, that the Respondent, Celestine 

Tatung, is REPRIMANDED for violating Rule 1.15 (safekeeping property) of the District 

of Columbia Rules of Professional Conduct and Federal Immigration Rules of Professional 

Conduct of Practitioners, 8 C.F.R. §1003.102(n) (conduct prejudicial to the administration 

of justice), (q)(1) and (2) (diligence), and (r)(1)-(3) (communication).

 Shirley M. Watts

 Senior Justice

ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE 

COMMISSION OF MARYLAND

v.

CELESTINE TATUNG

*

*

*

*

*

*

 IN THE

 SUPREME COURT

 OF MARYLAND

 AG No. 38

 September Term, 2022
### PR IVACY AND CIVIL LIBERTIES OVERSIGHT BOARD

6 CFR Ch. X

Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory Actions

AGENCY: Privacy and Civil Liberties Oversight Board.

ACTION: Semiannual regulatory agenda.

SUMMARY: Pursuant to the Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 601 to 612, and Executive Order

12866, the Privacy and Civil Liberties Oversight Board publishes the following Agenda of

proposed regulations that the Board issued or expects to issue and current rules that are under

review.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Diane Janosek, Chief Legal Officer, at (202) 331-

4084..

Dated: September 11, 2013.

NAME: Diane Janosek,
Chief Legal Counsel.The 1 Regulatory Agendas

Privacy and Civil Liberties Oversight Board - Final Rule

Title Regulation Identifier Number

Freedom of Information, Privacy Act, and Government in the Sunshine Act Procedures 0311-AA01

Privacy and Civil Liberties Oversight Board ( PCLOB ) RIN: 0311-AA01

View Related Documents

Title: Freedom of Information, Privacy Act, and Government in the Sunshine Act Procedures Abstract: This rulemaking will implement the Privacy and Civil Liberties Oversight Board's procedures for Freedom of Information Act, Privacy Act, and Government in the Sunshine Act compliance.

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Final Rule Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No CFR Citation: Not Yet Determined (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 5 USC 552; 5 USC 552a; 5 USC 552b Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite
NPRM 05/15/2013 78 FR 28532 NPRM Comment Period End 07/15/2013
Final Action 11/00/2013

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No Agency Contact: Claire McKenna Privacy and Civil Liberties Oversight Board

Phone: 202 366- 0365 E-Mail: claire.mckenna.pclob@dot.gov
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of ARV Assisted Living, Inc., (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2002 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I
Douglas M. Pasquale, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

          (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 12(a)
               or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
          (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
               material respects, the financial condition and result of
               operations of the Company.

          /s/ DOUGLAS M. PASQUALE
          -------------------------------
          Douglas M. Pasquale
          Chief Executive Officer
          November 13, 2002
### SERVED: October 11, 2016 DEPARTMeNlllfEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

## TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

## ZOih OCT I

## I 

## p 2: 

## 2b WASHINGTON, DC 

## DOCKET OPERATIONS In The Matter Of: Offshore Flight School,.Inc. Respondent ) ) ) ) ) DocketNo. FAA-2014-0691 Case No. 2014WP910016

DISMISSAL ORDER On October 6, 2016, the Respondent filed a Withdrawal ofRequest for Hearing, stating that the parties had reached a settlement in this matter. Pursuant to 14 C.F.R. 

### § 13.215, a party may withdraw a request for a hearing without the consent ofthe administrative lawjudge at any time before or during a hearing. Upon such withdrawal,the administrative lawjudge shall dismiss the case with prejudice. THEREFORE, IT IS ORDEREDthat these proceedings are dismissed withprejudice.

Attachment: Service ListSERVICE LIST- BY U.S. MAIL ORIGINAL & ONE COPY Federal Aviation Administration 800 Independence Avenue, S.W. Washington, DC 20591 Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2W1000 1
ONE COPY David Glenn Bettencourt, Respondent's Counsel Dillingham Transportation Building, Suite 304 735 Bishop Street Honolulu, HI 96813 TEL: 808-521-3491 FAX: 808-521-3494 Charles Raley, Complainant's Counsel Enforcement Division/ AGC-300 Office ofthe ChiefCounsel Federal Aviation Administration 800 Independence Avenue, S.W. Washington, DC 20591 TEL: 202-267-3357

**F~:** 202-267-5106 The Honorable Douglas M. Rawald,Administrative LawJudge Office ofHearings, M-20 U.S. Department ofTransportation 1200 NewJersey Avenue, S.E. (E11-310) Washington, DC 20590 TEL: 202-366-5121 StaffAssistant

**F~:** 202-366-7536 Docket No. FAA-2014-0691 (Civil Penalty Action)

1 Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person or by expedited courier, use the following address: Federal Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2Wl000, Washington, DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430.
#### STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY v. Dennis NEELY, a minor, by F. A. Neely, Jr., father and next friend.

No. 47378.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

Jan. 28, 1974.

Rehearing Denied Feb. 25, 1974.

Wise, Carter, Child, Steen & Caraway, Jackson, for appellant.

Michael J. Malouf, Jackson, for appellee.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Hinds County ; M. M. McGowan, Judge.

Before GILLESPIE, C. J., and INZER, ROBERTSON, WALKER and BROOM, JJ-

Affirmed.
Consent of Independent Accountants


We consent to the  incorporation by reference in the registration  statements of
Cooperative Bankshares, Inc. on Forms S-8 (Files No. 333-22335 and 333-92219) of
our report dated January 21, 2000, on our audits of the  consolidated  financial
statements of Cooperative Bankshares, Inc. as of December 31, 1999, and for each
of the two years in the period ended December 31, 1999, which report is included
in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

Raliegh, North Carolina
March 29, 2001
257 La. 985

#### Marshall WOODS et al. v. Pete STOMA.

No. 51175.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

March 10, 1971.

In re: Pete Stoma applying for certi-orari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Second Circuit, Parish of DeSoto. 242 So.2d 320.

Writ refused. On the facts found by the Court of Appeal, there is no error of law in its judgment.
#### In re ESTATE of Mary Bailey HALL, Deceased. Blanche S. HENDERSON et al., William J. Veazey et al. v. W. W. LATHAM, Jr., Administrator.

No. 44169.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

Feb. 6, 1967.

*95Alexander, Feduccia, & Alexander, Cleveland, Troutt & Moore, Senatobia, Robert G. Johnston, Cleveland, for appellants.

John White Valentine, Cleveland, for appellee.

ROBERTSON, Justice:

ON MOTION TO CLARIFY OPINION

Appellants, Mrs. Blanche S. Henderson, and Mrs. Katherine Henderson Waldrop, have asked this Court to indicate when the monthly payment of expenses incurred by them should begin, and whether the Chancellor has authority to invade the corpus, not only for necessities, but also for comforts.

This Court is of the opinion that the Chancellor has authority to reimburse Mrs. Henderson and Mrs. Waldrop for all necessary expenses incurred by them from the date of the death of Testatrix, Mary Bailey Hall, taking into account the $1,500 heretofore paid.

The Chancellor, in his sound discretion, may invade the corpus of the trust fund not only for necessities, but also for the comforts of life, for Mrs. Henderson and Mrs. Waldrop. Of course, the Chancellor should take into consideration the limited amount of the trust fund and the fact that it should last as long as reasonably possible.

All Justices concur.
#### Reginald G. JACKSON v. STATE.

No. 36953.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Feb. 1968.

Certiorari denied without opinion. 203 So.2d 335.
**Exhibit 32.1****Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**In connection with the Annual Report of FelCor Lodging Trust Incorporated (the “Registrant”) onForm 10-K for the three months and year ended December 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report), the undersigned hereby certifies, in thecapacity as indicated below and pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and  2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of Registrant.        January 8, 2008 /s/ Richard A. Smith   Richard A. Smith                                          Chief Executive Officer
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-7489

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

TREMAYNE KENDRICK BLACKWELL, a/k/a Little Kenny, a/k/a Tremayne 

Oakley Kendrick, a/k/a Tremayne Kendrick Blackwell, a/k/a Kenny, a/k/a Kendrick 

Jermaine Oakley, a/k/a Kendrick Tremayne Oakley,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at 

Statesville. Richard L. Voorhees, District Judge. (5:05-cr-00257-RLV-DCK-1)

Submitted: March 20, 2017 Decided: March 29, 2017

Before TRAXLER, SHEDD, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Tremayne Kendrick Blackwell, Appellant Pro Se. William Thomas Bozin, Thomas A. 

O'Malley, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charlotte, North Carolina, 

for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Tremayne Kendrick Blackwell seeks to appeal his conviction and sentence for 

conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute cocaine and cocaine base, in violation of 21 

U.S.C. §§ 846, 851 (2012). We dismiss the appeal as untimely.

In criminal cases, the defendant must file the notice of appeal within 14 days after 

the entry of judgment. Fed. R. App. P. 4(b)(1)(A). Although this time limit is not 

jurisdictional, United States v. Urutyan, 564 F.3d 679, 685 (4th Cir. 2009), we may raise 

the Rule 4(b) time bar sua sponte when judicial resources and administration are implicated 

or the delay has been inordinate, United States v. Mitchell, 518 F.3d 740, 750 (10th Cir. 

2008).

The district court first entered judgment on February 18, 2009, and entered 

judgment resentencing Blackwell on December 3, 2015. Blackwell filed his notice of 

appeal on October 25, 2016, long after the 14-day appeal period expired. Because 

Blackwell did not file a notice of appeal that was timely or within the time period during 

which the district court had the authority to extend the appeal period, Fed. R. App. P. 

4(b)(4), and because the delay in filing has been inordinate, we dismiss the appeal. We 

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately 

presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional 

process.

DISMISSED
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 3560

To establish certain requirments relating to the transfer or disposal of public

lands managed by the Bureau of Land management, and for other purposes.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

NOVEMBER 19, 1993

Mr. HEFLEY introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Natural Resources

A BILL

To establish certain requirments relating to the transfer or

disposal of public lands managed by the Bureau of Land

management, and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. FINDINGS

4 The Congress finds that—

5 (1) the Bureau of Land Management presently

6 holds title to 1,800,000,000 acres of public land,

7 (2) much of this land is marginal in value and

8 left over from the 19th century,
2

•HR 3560 IH

1 (3) in many cases, the costs of maintaining and

2 surveying this land far exceed the actual value of

3 these parcels,

4 (4) the agency is presently facing a sizable

5 budget backlog which is hampering its ability to

6 properly manage all of this property,

7 (5) under the Federal Land Policy and Man8 agement Act of 1976, the Bureau is required to

9 identify public lands suitable for sale, exchange, or

10 transfer, and

11 (6) the transfer of some of these parcels could

12 effect budget savings and greater management effi13 ciencies for the Bureau.

14 SEC. 2. TRANSFER OR DISPOSAL OF PUBLIC LANDS.

15 Annual budget requests submitted by the Secretary

16 of the Interior shall be accompanied by information as to

17 whether the Bureau of Land Management, through prepa18 ration of land-use plans pursuant to the Federal Land

19 Policy and Management Act of 1976, has identified public

20 lands which are suitable for transfer to other management

21 or for disposal through exchange or otherwise, the transfer

22 or disposal of which have been delayed because of incom23 plete surveys or other reasons. If enactment of additional

24 legislation would be desirable in order to facilitate the

25 transfer or disposal of public lands described in the re-
3

•HR 3560 IH

1 quest, the Secretary may include a proposal for such addi2 tional legislation in such request.

Æ
#### Leila COOPER, Petitioner, v. HOME INDEMNITY COMPANY et al., Respondents.

No. 43447.

Supreme Court of Florida.

May 22, 1973.

Certiorari denied.

ROBERTS, Acting C. J., and ERVIN, ADKINS, BOYD and McCAIN, JJ., concur.
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 13

- 10441 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

,

Plaintiff

- Appellee

v.

ARTURO CATALAN

- NAVA

,

Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:12

- CR

- 305

- 1

Before JOLLY, SMITH, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Arturo Catalan

- Nava appeals his 24

- month sentence of imprisonment.

Given that Catalan

- Nava has been released from prison and is not serving a
term of supervised release, h is appeal is moot. See United States v. Clark , 193
F.3d 845, 847

- 48 (5th Cir. 1999).

APPEAL DISMISSED.

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED June 30, 2014
Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 13-10441 Document: 00512681376 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/30/2014
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

STELLA ANJENKENG FONKENG,

 Petitioner,

 v.

ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney

General,

 Respondent.

No. 10-71425

Agency No. A097-854-014

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Argued and Submitted March 7, 2014

Pasadena, California

Before: KOZINSKI, Chief Judge, GRABER, Circuit Judge, and BREYER, 

Senior District Judge.** 

1. The BIA properly dismissed Petitioner Stella Fonkeng’s appeal from the

IJ’s decision denying her asylum and withholding of removal on the basis of an

FILED

MAR 27 2014

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

 * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

 ** The Honorable Charles R. Breyer, Senior District Judge for the U.S.

District Court for the Northern District of California, sitting by designation.
page 2

adverse credibility determination. See Jie Cui v. Holder, 712 F.3d 1332, 1338 (9th

Cir. 2013). The IJ and BIA found that Fonkeng lacked credibility, not because she

lied about her visa and means of travel, but because the inconsistencies directly

related to her motive for coming to the U.S. Singh v. Gonzales, 439 F.3d 1100,

1108 (9th Cir. 2006).

2. Neither the IJ nor the BIA failed to analyze separately Fonkeng’s

Convention Against Torture claim. Farah v. Ashcroft, 348 F.3d 1153, 1156–57

(9th Cir. 2003). The IJ and BIA reviewed the extrinsic evidence of alleged past

torture against Fonkeng, including the country reports and photographs of

Fonkeng’s scars. They properly concluded that the evidence didn’t “suffice to

demonstrate that she is more likely than not to be tortured if returned to

Cameroon.” 

PETITION DENIED.