alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2015128EN.01000601.xml

| 21.4.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 128/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.4.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 128/6

---

Notice for the attention of the persons to whom restrictive measures provided for in Council Decision 2010/656/CFSP as implemented by Council Implementing Decision (CFSP) 2015/621, and in Council Regulation (EC) No 560/2005 as implemented by Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/615, concerning restrictive measures against certain persons and entities in Côte d’Ivoire apply

(2015/C 128/04)

The following information is brought to the attention of the persons who appear in Annex II to Council Decision 2010/656/CFSP (1), as implemented by Council Implementing Decision (CFSP) 2015/621 (2), and in Annex IA to Council Regulation (EC) No 560/2005 (3), as implemented by Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/615 (4), imposing certain restrictive measures directed against certain persons and entities in Côte d’Ivoire.

1

2

3

4

The Council of the European Union has determined that the persons that appear in the abovementioned Annexes should continue to be included in the list of persons subject to restrictive measures provided for in Decision 2010/656/CFSP and in Regulation (EC) No 560/2005.

The attention of the persons concerned is drawn to the possibility of making an application to the competent authorities of the relevant Member State(s) as indicated on the websites in Annex II to Regulation (EC) No 560/2005, in order to obtain an authorisation to use frozen funds for basic needs or specific payments (cf. Article 3 of the Regulation).

For the purpose of the Council’s next review of the list of persons subject to restrictive measures, the persons concerned may submit a request to the Council before 31 March 2016, together with supporting documentation, that the decision to include them on the said list should be reconsidered, to the following address:

| Council of the European Union |
| --- |
| General Secretariat |
| DG C 1C |
| Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175 |
| 1048 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |
| E-mail: sanctions@consilium.europa.eu |

Council of the European Union

General Secretariat

DG C 1C

Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175

1048 Bruxelles/Brussel

BELGIQUE/BELGIË

E-mail: sanctions@consilium.europa.eu

The attention of the persons concerned is also drawn to the possibility of challenging the Council’s decision before the General Court of the European Union, in accordance with the conditions laid down in Article 275, 2nd paragraph, and Article 263, 4th and 6th paragraphs, of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union.

---

(1)  OJ L 285, 30.10.2010, p. 28.

1

(2)  OJ L 102, 21.4.2015, p. 63.

2

(3)  OJ L 95, 14.4.2005, p. 1.

3

(4)  OJ L 102, 21.4.2015, p. 29.

4

---
Exhibit 32.1








CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. Section 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In connection with the Quarterly Report of CN Resources Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended February 28, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “report”), I, Oliver Xing, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated this 13th day of April, 2011.








OLIVER XINGOliver XingChief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
## 

EXHIBIT
99

American Country Holdings Inc.  Audit Committee

CHARTER

Status

The Audit Committee is appointed by the Board of Directors to assist the Board in monitoring (i) the integrity of the financial statements of the
Company, including the adequacy of the internal financial controls, (ii) compliance by the Company with legal and regulatory requirements, and (iii) the independence and performance of
the Company's auditors.

Membership

The Audit Committee will consist of three or more directors all of whom in the judgment of the Board of Directors will be independent. Each member will in the
judgment of the Board of Directors have the ability to read and understand the Company's basic financial statements or will, at the time of appointment, undertake training for that purpose. At least
one member of the Audit Committee will, in the judgment of the Board of Directors, have accounting or financial management expertise. The Audit Committee will annually appoint a chairman.

Responsibilities

---



Meetings

The Audit Committee will meet four (4) times each year and at such other times as it deems necessary to fulfill its responsibilities.

Report

The Audit Committee will prepare a report each year concerning its compliance with this charter for inclusion in the Company's proxy statement relating to the
election of directors.

While
the Audit Committee has the responsibilities and powers set forth in this Charter, it is not the duty of the Audit Committee to plan or conduct audits or to determine that the
Company's financial statements are complete and accurate and are in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. Nor is it the duty of the Audit Committee to conduct investigations, to
resolve disagreements, if any, between management and the independent auditor or to assure compliance with laws and regulations and the Company's Code of Conduct.

---

## QuickLinks
#### In re ESTATE of Nick SULIN, Deceased.

No. 37043.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Feb. 1968.

Rehearing Denied March 27, 1968.

Certiorari denied without opinion. 204 So.2d 28.
EXHIBIT 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. {section} 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of China Rising Star Limited (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Jeremy Mork, Chief Executive and Financial  Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. {section} 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes- Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



|Dated:  May 25, 2011
By  /s/ Jeremy Mork
-----------------------------
    Jeremy Mork
    Chief Executive and  Financial Officer
   (Principal Executive and Financial Officer)
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
No. 00-7370.

#### Foster *v.*Department of Justice.

C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.
#### Julia HOWARD and Horace Harley, Appellants, v. Hinton HOWARD, Jr. and Josephine Stanton King, Appellees.

No. S-43.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

July 5, 1973.

Lewis E. Dinkins, Ocala, for appellants.

Charles R. Rowe, Homestead, for ap-pellees.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed on authority of Mullan v. Bank of Pasco County; 101 Fla. 1097, 133 So. 323 (1931).

RAWLS, C. J., and JOHNSON and SPECTOR, JJ., concur.
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3560 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3560

 To establish certain requirments relating to the transfer or disposal 
of public lands managed by the Bureau of Land management, and for other 
                               purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           November 19, 1993

  Mr. Hefley introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                     Committee on Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To establish certain requirments relating to the transfer or disposal 
of public lands managed by the Bureau of Land management, and for other 
                               purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. FINDINGS

    The Congress finds that--
            (1) the Bureau of Land Management presently holds title to 
        1,800,000,000 acres of public land,
            (2) much of this land is marginal in value and left over 
        from the 19th century,
            (3) in many cases, the costs of maintaining and surveying 
        this land far exceed the actual value of these parcels,
            (4) the agency is presently facing a sizable budget backlog 
        which is hampering its ability to properly manage all of this 
        property,
            (5) under the Federal Land Policy and Management Act of 
        1976, the Bureau is required to identify public lands suitable 
        for sale, exchange, or transfer, and
            (6) the transfer of some of these parcels could effect 
        budget savings and greater management efficiencies for the 
        Bureau.

SEC. 2. TRANSFER OR DISPOSAL OF PUBLIC LANDS.

    Annual budget requests submitted by the Secretary of the Interior 
shall be accompanied by information as to whether the Bureau of Land 
Management, through preparation of land-use plans pursuant to the 
Federal Land Policy and Management Act of 1976, has identified public 
lands which are suitable for transfer to other management or for 
disposal through exchange or otherwise, the transfer or disposal of 
which have been delayed because of incomplete surveys or other reasons. 
If enactment of additional legislation would be desirable in order to 
facilitate the transfer or disposal of public lands described in the 
request, the Secretary may include a proposal for such additional 
legislation in such request.

                                 <all>
```
#### Mrs. Clarice TURNER v. Billy Joe NIX and W. G. McGehee.

No. 44596.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

Oct. 16, 1967.

Brewer, Deaton & Evans, Greenwood, for appellant.

Odom, Odom & Pittman, Greenwood, Black & Boykin, Carrollton, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
#### The NATIONAL SHAWMUT BANK OF BOSTON, a United States banking corporation, as Executor under the Last Will and Testament of Russell T. Hamlet, Deceased, Appellant, v. Patricia WOODWARD, a single woman, Appellee.

No. 68-68.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Third District.

April 23, 1968.

Spence & Spence, Miami, for appellant.

Kurtz & Cooper, Miami, for appellee.

Before PEARSON, BARKDULL and SWANN, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed upon the authority of the rule stated in Buchman v. Grimes, 261 Ala. 383, 74 So.2d 443 (1954). Cf. Metzenbaum v. Metzenbaum, 86 Cal.App.2d 750, 195 P.2d 492 (1948). See also § 660.10(3) Fla.Stat., F.S.A. and Rule 1.370(b), R.C.P. (1967), 30 F.S.A.
null

961.4444
# C_2015435EN.01000901.xml

| 24.12.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 435/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.12.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 435/9

---

Notice for the attention of the data subjects to whom the restrictive measures provided for in Council Regulation (EU) No 224/2014 as implemented by Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/2454, concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in the Central African Republic, apply

(2015/C 435/05)

The attention of data subjects is drawn to the following information in accordance with Article 12 of Regulation (EC) No 45/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council (1).

1

The legal basis for this processing operation is Council Regulation (EU) No 224/2014 (2), as implemented by Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/2454 (3).

2

3

The controller of this processing operation is the Council of the European Union, represented by the Director General of DG C (Foreign Affairs, Enlargement, Civil Protection) of the General Secretariat of the Council, and the department entrusted with the processing operation is Unit 1C, which can be contacted at:

| Council of the European Union |
| --- |
| General Secretariat |
| DG C 1C |
| Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175 |
| 1048 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |
| Email: sanctions@consilium.europa.eu |

Council of the European Union

General Secretariat

DG C 1C

Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175

1048 Bruxelles/Brussel

BELGIQUE/BELGIË

Email: sanctions@consilium.europa.eu

The purpose of the processing operation is the establishment and updating of the list of persons subject to restrictive measures in accordance with Regulation (EU) No 224/2014, as implemented by Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/2454.

The data subjects are the natural persons who fulfil the listing criteria as laid down in that Regulation.

The personal data collected includes data necessary for the correct identification of the person concerned, the Statement of Reasons and any other data related thereto.

The personal data collected may be shared as necessary with the European External Action Service and the Commission.

Without prejudice to restrictions provided for in Article 20(1)(a) and (d) of Regulation (EC) No 45/2001, requests for access, as well as requests for rectification or objection, will be answered in accordance with Section 5 of Council Decision 2004/644/EC (4).

4

Personal data will be retained for five years from the moment the data subject has been removed from the list of persons subject to the asset freeze or the validity of the measure has expired, or for the duration of court proceedings in the event they had been started.

Data subjects may have recourse to the European Data Protection Supervisor in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 45/2001.

---

(1)  OJ L 8, 12.1.2001, p. 1.

1

(2)  OJ L 70, 11.3.2014, p. 1.

2

(3)  OJ L 339, 24.12.2015, p. 36

3

(4)  OJ L 296, 21.9.2004, p. 16.

4

---
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

The undersigned hereby certifies, in his capacity as the Principal Executive Officer of China ShouGuan Mining Corporation****(the “Company”), for the purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of his knowledge:

(1)  The Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2015 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

| Dated:  May 20, 2015

/s/ Feize Zhang

  

Feize Zhang

Chairman and Principal Executive Officer

 

(Principal Executive Officer)

This certification accompanies each Report pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of §18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request. |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
#### Richard Joe JOHNSON, alias v. STATE.

7 Div. 259.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

Dec. 11, 1973.

Rehearing Denied Jan. 2, 1974.

Myron K. Allenstein, Gadsden, for appellant.

William J. Baxley, Atty. Gen., and David Lee Weathers, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State.

TYSON, Judge.

The appellant was charged by the Grand Jury of Etowah County, Alabama, with the first degree murder of Sylvester A. Whor-ton by shooting him with a gun or pistol. At arraignment the appellant, accompanied by counsel, entered a plea of not guilty, and the cause was set for trial with regular and special venires being drawn.

On March 1, 1973, the appellant appeared in open court, accompanied by his attorney, and entered a plea of guilty to the offense of murder in the second degree, and at this time was sentenced to thirty years imprisonment.

The appellant gave notice of appeal, and from this judgment prosecutes this appeal.

The record in this cause affirmatively reflects a colloquy between the trial judge, the appellant, and his counsel in accordance with Walcott v. State, 288 Ala. 546, 263 So.2d 178; and Honeycutt v. State, 47 Ala.App. 640, 259 So.2d 846, which shows the questions asked and answers given at the time of taking the plea of guilty. This colloquy shows that there were no threats, coercion, intimidation, or inducement, made to obtain the guilty plea, and that such was done by the appellant after full consultation with his counsel, and with full knowledge of its consequences.

At issue is whether or not a full compliance with Boykin v. Alabama, 395 U.S. 238, 89 S.Ct. 1709, 23 L.Ed.2d 274, is here shown.

An examination of the colloquy in this cause shows that the trial judge, before taking the plea in question, in addition to the matters above stated, advised the appellant as to his privilege against compulsory self-incrimination, of his right to a public trial by jury, of his right to confront his accusers, and to have compulsory process to obtain witnesses, and that such witnesses be cross-examined in his presence, Boykin v. Alabama, supra. In addition, the colloquy in question affirmatively reflects that the trial judge did advise the appellant *663of the minimum punishment and the maximum punishment which might be imposed by the court, Carter v. State, Ala., 277 So.2d 896; Cooper v. State, 47 Ala.App. 178, 252 So.2d 104, cert. den. 287 Ala. 728, 252 So.2d 108; Clark v. State, 48 Ala.App. 108, 262 So.2d 310, cert. den. 288 Ala. 736, 262 So.2d 312.

Counsel argues that toward the end of the colloquy, when asked by the court, “Did you do that [referring to the offense in question],” the appellant replied, “Yes, sir, I guess so,” to show the appellant did not fully understand. However, the completed colloquy shows the question from the court, “You guess so? Don’t you know,” to which the appellant replied, “Yes.”

We have carefully examined this record and find that such was in full compliance with federal and state standards, and that the judgment in question is therefore due to be and the same is hereby

Affirmed.

All the Judges concur.
NUMBER 13-16-00140-CR

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

 

SALUSTIANO VALENTE ARISMENDI, Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee.

On Appeal from the 24th District Court

of Victoria County, Texas.

ORDER OF ABATEMENT

Before Justices Benavides, Perkes, and Longoria

Order Per Curiam

Appellant’s brief was due on May 4, 2016. Pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate 

Procedure 38.8(b)(2), on May 9, 2016, the Clerk of the Court notified appellant’s counsel 

that the brief had not been timely filed, requested counsel to file a response concerning 
2

the failure to file the brief within ten days, and warned counsel that the Court would abate 

and remand this cause to the trial court for appropriate findings if a response was not 

filed. Counsel has nevertheless failed to file either a response or an appellate brief in 

this matter. 

Accordingly, we now ABATE this appeal and REMAND the cause to the trial court 

for further proceedings pursuant to Rule 38.8(b)(2) and (3) of the Texas Rules of Appellate 

Procedure. Upon remand, the trial court shall utilize whatever means necessary to make 

appropriate findings and recommendations concerning the following: (1) whether 

appellant desires to prosecute this appeal; (2) why appellant's counsel has failed to file a 

brief and whether counsel has effectively abandoned the appeal; (3) whether appellant 

has been denied effective assistance of counsel; (4) whether appellant's counsel should 

be removed; and (5) whether appellant is indigent and entitled to court-appointed counsel.

If the trial court determines that appellant does want to continue the appeal, that 

present counsel should be removed, and that appellant is indigent and entitled to 

court-appointed counsel, the trial court shall appoint new counsel to represent appellant 

in this appeal. If new counsel is appointed, the name, address, email address, telephone 

number, and state bar number of said counsel shall be included in an order appointing 

counsel.

The trial court shall cause its findings and recommendations, together with any 

orders it may enter regarding the aforementioned issues, to be included in a supplemental 

clerk's record. Furthermore, the trial court shall cause a supplemental reporter's record 

of any proceedings to be prepared. The supplemental clerk's record and supplemental 
3

reporter's record, if any, shall be filed with the Clerk of this Court on or before the 

expiration of thirty days from the date of this order.

It is so ORDERED.

PER CURIAM

Do not publish.

TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).

Delivered and filed this

the 27th day of May, 2016.
EXHIBIT
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Annual Report of The Singing Machine Company, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the year ended March 31, 2009 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Anton
Handal, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:





(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
The Singing Machine Company, Inc. and will be retained by The Singing Machine
Company, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.





/S/ Anton
      HandalAnton
      HandalChief
      Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)Date:
      June 29,
2009
#### GOURMET MASTERS, INC., a Florida corporation, Appellant, v. Herschel LEVY, Appellee.

No. 67-644.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Third District.

Aug. 17, 1967.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed.