alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
U.S. flag
              An official website of the United States government Skip to main content   end of header Census.gov Newsroom Releases Miscellaneous
 Newsroom Archive
 Skip left menu navigation
 About the Newsroom
 				Facts for Features
 				**News Releases**
 				Press Kits
 				Tip Sheets
 Release Information CB12-49 **Contact:**  Vicki GlasierPublic Information Office
301-763-3030 Press kit
 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:  FRIDAY, MARCH 23, 2012 Media Advisory — Census Bureau Webinar to Discuss 1940 Census Records Release In anticipation of the April 2 release of 1940 Census records from the National Archives, the U.S. Census Bureau will hold a webinar to provide the media with an overview of the 1940 Census release. The webinar will highlight notable 1940 Census facts with corresponding information from the 2010 Census and provide a demonstration from the National Archives and Records Administration on accessing these records when they become available to the public. The news conference will consist of a simultaneous audio conference and online presentation. Information on accessing the online presentation is provided below. Reporters will be able to ask questions once the presentation is complete. We suggest reporters log in and call in early.
    
  **Audio conference — access information**
    Toll free number: 888-913-9972
    Participant passcode: 1940CENSUS**Note: Stay on the line until operator asks for the passcode. Do not key in passcode.** **Online presentation — access information
  Please login early, as some setup is required.**
  URL: <https://www.mymeetings.com/nc/join/> 
  Conference/meeting number: PW7478285
  Conference/meeting passcode: 1940CENSUS
  CONNECT WITH US

Information Quality
                    Data Linkage Infrastructure
                    Data Protection and Privacy Policy
                    Accessibility      
                    FOIA
                    Inspector General
                    No FEAR Act
                    U.S. Department of Commerce
                    USA.gov
                   Measuring America's People, Places, and Economy
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 3597

To conduct a demonstration project which permits traditional wildlife-related

uses on lands acquired for the Edwin B. Forsythe Wildlife Refuge until

a public use management plan for those lands is adopted.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

NOVEMBER 20, 1993

Mr. SAXTON introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Merchant Marine and Fisheries

A BILL

To conduct a demonstration project which permits traditional

wildlife-related uses on lands acquired for the Edwin

B. Forsythe Wildlife Refuge until a public use management plan for those lands is adopted.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That for the 5-year period beginning on the date of enact4 ment of this Act and notwithstanding the National Wild5 life Refuge System Administration Act of 1966 (16 U.S.C.

6 668dd), the Secretary of the Interior shall conduct a dem7 onstration project under which the Secretary shall permit

8 the traditional wildlife-related uses, including fishing and
2

•HR 3597 IH

1 hunting, of lands acquired after the date of enactment of

2 this Act for inclusion in the Edwin B. Forsythe Wildlife

3 Refuge until a formal public use management plan for

4 those lands is adopted. At the end of the 5-year period,

5 the Secretary shall submit a report to the Congress on

6 the results of the demonstration project carried out under

7 this Act.

Æ
u.s. D.epartmtnt o1 Transpollc!)an O:t•te Q;**ir~secr~iOrv** Or**TrO~j~I-.Jr•on.** 

### Chief. Documentary Services 

### Div.**Dep~rtment** of**Tnili~portarion** Wash.ingtcm. 

### D.C, 20590 DESIGNATION OF A(jENT FOR SERVICE 

# <W NOTICE.

### PROC~$5. ORDERS

. . DECJSIONS AND REQUIREMENTS
.

ATTENTION: DOCKET 

### Sl;C:TION. C-55 

### .F'lybe Finland Oljykuja tName .of Company. please. print) 

### oflice.'ar 

### 01jykuja 2, 01S30 

### Vantaa, Finland (Addressi • ha\•ing its principal**~er¢1:Jy** deslgpates. pubiuant to 

### section 46!()3 of 

### Title 

### 49oft.he U.S. C()de ifornterly 

### sec.tion loP51bJ of 

### the rellentl A\imion Act or 1958. 

### as ;)ITietidedl the person nqnied below as it' Age!JI upoll 

### ":hom**~en;j(.•e** of llll**nptlc~~ andprO<.·es~;·llnd**  :ill 

### twder.,,**deci.~lon** .... ()nd requirements of lhi!. Depanl'nerii of·Traqsportaiion may 

### be made for am:i
.. on behalf of sa\d 

### carrier. hereby 

### canceling all pre\'iOU!> d¢signations <lf agenrs rnride by it to ihe DOT.



### . .. Eyel:Yn ;D. 

## sahi', Esq:. Name. of Agent ·.. · . · .. . . . ·.·.· ·. . . . . .. ··· ....... , .. 

# Eckert Seamans Cherin

## ~**Mel~~f.S€,P~"If¥Jc** 17i7 Pennsylvania Ave 

## :N.w. i21::h Floor Address 

### .....,.W"'a""s=n"". ""J.'::-:n""g"'t""o="n=-
..**.,...;~· ""D~C..-.2""""0"'0..,0"'6,...,.....------...-,----------------** 

. . 

### The**A~ent** 

### so (fesignated 

### has written his 

### name and 

### also his initials in 

### the**followin~** space: Name


### IN WITNESS 

### WHEREOF.**_F~l.:."j_b_e_F_J._· n_l_a_·~n_d_o.=y**  

### _____________ has caus,ed these (Name 

## of <:ompa11y> presents to 

### be,signed in its name by

# _--JM~·..:.k~·t-::::.:e:::· __ :.!!:f2:::.:u::!.---.!..r ..:.'7..=13-:::..:l.,L·

# ~-------~-----· President {Please 

### Print) 

### of said conipa):iy. 

### and to be !lttested 

## under its corporaie 

## seal by

ATTEST: 

# fl / (" ,.(.**;ltt,ti=;:~}:j,L** {Secretary. or otl'ler 

### officer) OST F 1010.5 j'l-95) \.-" 

### ($ecretary, or other 

### Title)


### Flybe ::finland**Oljy~uja** 

### (Name of Company)
(President}
258 La. 967

#### STATE of Louisiana ex rel. Alfred DORSEY, Jr. v. C. Murray HENDERSON, Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary.

No. 51468.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

June 16, 1971.

In re: Alfred Dorsey, Jr., applying for writ of habeas corpus.

Application granted. See Order.

ORDER

Considering the showing made in the application and the response of the District Attorney:

It Is Ordered that the application of applicant, Alfred Dorsey, Jr. is hereby granted, and the Ninth Judicial District Court for the Parish of Rapides is hereby ordered to grant applicant an out-of-time appeal to this Court returnable on a date to be fixed, and that the said Ninth Judicial District Court appoint an attorney to perfect his bills of exceptions and prosecute the appeal to be granted to applicant.
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED MAY 6, 2022

NO. 03-21-00081-CV

Michael Joseph Castillo and Orlando Castillo, Appellants

v.

Melissa Castillo-Wall, Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE COUNTY COURT AT LAW OF BURNET COUNTY

BEFORE JUSTICES GOODWIN, SMITH, AND JONES

AFFIRMED -- OPINION BY JUSTICE JONES

This is an appeal from the order admitting the will to probate as a muniment of title, signed by 

the trial court on February 2, 2021. Having reviewed the record and the parties’ arguments, the 

Court holds that there was no reversible error in the order. Therefore, the Court affirms the trial 

court’s order. Appellants shall pay all costs relating to this appeal, both in this Court and in the 

court below.
# C_2013211EN.01000101.xml

| 25.7.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 211/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.7.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 211/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.6866 — Time Warner/CME)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2013/C 211/01

On 14 June 2013, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32013M6866. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32013M6866. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.

---
#### STATE of Florida, Petitioner, v. Madison Lee REYNOLDS, Respondent.

No. 38849.

Supreme Court of Florida.

March 11, 1970.

Rehearing Denied April 20, 1970.

*601Earl Faircloth, Atty. Gen., and James Robert Yon, Asst. Atty. Gen., for petitioner.

Walter R. Talley, Public Defender, and D. Turner Matthews, Asst. Public Defender, for respondent.

ADKINS, Justice.

By petition for certiorari, we are requested to review a decision of the District Court of Appeal, Second District (224 So.2d 772) because of alleged conflict with prior decision of this Court.

This case differs from State v. Reynolds, Fla., 238 So.2d 598 only in that it involves an order entered by the Circuit Judge of another county after a second petition for post-conviction relief had been filed. Each petition was denied because respondent was incarcerated in the State of Texas.

The motion to vacate under consideration was the second one filed by respondent, each of which was based upon the contention that respondent was without counsel at critical stages of the proceedings against him. Each of the two denials were based upon the fact that respondent was not “in custody.” Under these circumstances the Court is not precluded from considering the correctness of the summary denial of respondent’s contention that he was without counsel on the ground that this contention was previously rejected, Lawson v. State, Fla., 231 So.2d 205 (opinion filed January 28, 1970), for the question was not determined by the Circuit Judge.

The writ of certiorari is discharged.

ERVIN, C. J., DREW and CARLTON, JJ., and HENDRY, District Judge, concur.
#### Benjamin COLLINS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 67-259.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Second District.

Oct. 25, 1967.

Rehearing Denied Nov. 9, 1967.

Robert E. Jagger, Public Defender, and Carleton L. Weidemeyer, Asst. Public Defender, Clearwater, for appellant.

Earl Faircloth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Robert R. Crittenden, Asst. Atty. Gen., Lakeland, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Defendant-appellant was charged by way of information with three counts of robbery and one count of attempted robbery. The defendant, represented throughout the proceeding by the public defender’s office, entered a plea of guilty to all charges. The trial judge sentenced the defendant from six months to ten years on one charge and to three concurrent six months to two year sentences on 'the other three charges, which were to run consecutively with the above six month to ten year sentence. Subsequently, appellant filed this motion to vacate the judgment and sentence pursuant to Criminal Procedure Rule No. 1, F.S.A. ch. 924 Appendix, and represented again by the public defender, appellant has assigned as error the trial court’s refusal to set aside the judgment and conviction.

Appellant argues in his brief that he was without counsel at preliminary and accusatory stages of the proceeding; that he was not advised of his rights until after the proceedings; that counsel was later appointed for purpose of trial but that said counsel talked with him for merely five minutes and advised petitioner to plead guilty.

After careful examination of the record on appeal, we find the allegations to be without merit.

The trial judge properly refused to set aside the judgment and sentence and the order is, therefore, affirmed.

Affirmed.

LILES, C. J., and ALLEN and SHANNON, JJ., concur.
#### Leland H. PLYMALE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 70-623.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Jan. 6, 1971.

Appeal quashed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          OCT-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             MAY-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUL-31-2000
<CASH>                                           7,299
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,675,837
<ALLOWANCES>                                    90,000
<INVENTORY>                                    684,719
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,502,795
<PP&E>                                      23,009,947
<DEPRECIATION>                              10,882,795
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              15,378,388
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        6,623,537
<BONDS>                                      4,417,210
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         8,059
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,909,566
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                15,378,388
<SALES>                                      8,684,934
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             8,684,934
<CGS>                                        5,112,952
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                5,112,952
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             846,997
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (628,798)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (628,798)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.08)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.08)


</TABLE>
# C_2015017EN.01000901.xml

| 20.1.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 17/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.1.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 17/9

---

Extract of a winding-up measure decided under Article 9 of Directive 2001/24/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on the reorganisation and winding-up of credit institutions

(2015/C 17/04)

Riga District Court on 17 December 2014 has ruled to declare JSC in liquidation OGRES KOMERCBANKA (registration #40003150023) insolvent and appointed administrator Raivo Sjademe.

| Credit Institution | JSC in liquidation OGRES KOMERCBANKA
  registration #40003150023 |
| --- | --- |
| Date | 17 December 2014 |
| Entry into force | 17 December 2014 |
| Nature of Decision | Opening of winding-up (insolvency) proceedings
  Appointment of the administrator |
| Competent authority | Riga District Court |
| Supervisory authority | Financial and Capital Market Commission |
| 1 Kungu St. |
| Rīga, LV-1050 |
| LATVIJA |
| Tel. +371 7774800 |

Credit Institution

JSC in liquidation OGRES KOMERCBANKA

registration #40003150023

Date

17 December 2014

Entry into force

17 December 2014

Nature of Decision

Opening of winding-up (insolvency) proceedings

Appointment of the administrator

Competent authority

Riga District Court

Supervisory authority

Financial and Capital Market Commission

1 Kungu St.

Rīga, LV-1050

LATVIJA

Tel. +371 7774800

Appointed administrator

| Mr Raivo Sjademe |
| --- |
| 209-1 Brivibas blv. |
| Rīga, LV-1039 |
| LATVIJA |
| Tel. +371 67544458 |
| E-mail: ogre@advokatiss.lv |

Mr Raivo Sjademe

209-1 Brivibas blv.

Rīga, LV-1039

LATVIJA

Tel. +371 67544458

E-mail: ogre@advokatiss.lv

---
EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB/A of Universal Property
Development and Acquisition Corporation (the "Company") for the fiscal year
ended December 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Kamal Abdallah , principle financial officer
of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to
ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

                                                   /s/ Kamal Abdallah
                                                   ------------------
                                                   Kamal Abdallah

July 17, 2006


The foregoing certification is made solely for the purpose of 18 U. S.C. Section
1350, subject to the knowledge standard contained therein, and not for any other
purpose.
Exhibit 31.4

Certification of Principal Financial Officer

I, Paul W. Hoelscher, certify that:



| | 1. | I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the quarterly report on Form 10-Q/A of Horizon Pharma plc; and
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                 
|-------------------------------------------------
|Date: May 26, 2017                               
|                                                 
|/s/ Paul W.
Hoelscher                            
|Paul W. Hoelscher                                
|Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer
|(Principal Financial Officer)
EXHIBIT 32.1





CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER





PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)





In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2015 (the “Report”) of New Mountain Finance Corporation (the “Registrant”), as filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Robert A. Hamwee, the Chief Executive Officer of the Registrant, hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge, that:





|    |                                                                                                                                  
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

|    |                                                                                                                                                        
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.




/s/ ROBERT A. HAMWEEName:Robert A. HamweeDate:November 4, 2015
**Exhibit 23.1****CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PETROLEUM ENGINEERS**Ralph E. Davis Associates, Inc. hereby consents to the reference to our firm and to its havingprepared a report of DOMINION RESOURCES BLACK WARRIOR TRUST (the “Company”), and an estimate of theproved gas reserves for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007. We hereby further consent to theuse of the report dated March 3, 2008 appearing in the Company’s Form 10-K for the year endedDecember 31, 2007 and in all current and future registration statements of the Company thatincorporate by reference such Form 10-K.      RALPH E. DAVIS ASSOCIATES, INC.
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 3467

To establish a health care reform trust fund in the Treasury of the United

States.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

NOVEMBER 8, 1993

Mr. RICHARDSON introduced the following bill; which was referred jointly to

the Committees on Energy and Commerce, Ways and Means, and Government Operations

A BILL

To establish a health care reform trust fund in the Treasury

of the United States.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. HEALTH CARE REFORM TRUST FUND.

4 (a) ESTABLISHMENT.—There is established the

5 Health Care Reform Trust Fund (hereinafter referred to

6 as the ‘‘Fund’’) for the purposes of guaranteeing that the

7 net deficit reduction required by the Health Security Act

8 is fully achieved.

9 (b) MONEYS IN THE FUND.—The Fund shall consist

10 only of amounts equal to the net deficit reduction, cal-
2

•HR 3467 IH

1 culated pursuant to the procedures set forth in subsection

2 (c), that is estimated to result from the Health Security

3 Act. Such amounts shall be transferred to the Fund as

4 specified in subsection (c).

5 (c) TRANSFER OF MONEYS.—Within 10 days of en6 actment of the Health Security Act—

7 (1) the Director of the Office of Management

8 and Budget shall determine the sum of the net defi9 cit reduction that results from the enactment of the

10 Health Security Act; and

11 (2) there shall be transferred from the general

12 fund to the Fund an amount equal to the sum deter13 mined in paragraph (1).

14 (d) USE OF MONEYS.—Notwithstanding any other

15 provision of law, the amounts in the Fund shall be used

16 exclusively for health care reform.

17 (e) GRH EXCLUSION.—Amounts in the Fund, as de18 termined by the Director of the Office of Management and

19 Budget, that result from the net total of direct spending

20 and receipts provisions calculated according to the provi21 sions of section 252 of the Balanced Budget and Emer22 gency Deficit Control Act of 1985 shall be excluded from,

23 and shall not be counted for purposes of, the totals under

24 section 252 and sections 254(d)(3) and 254(g)(3) of that

25 Act.
3

•HR 3467 IH

1 (f) PRESIDENT’S BUDGET.—Section 1105(a) of title

2 31, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end

3 thereof:

4 ‘‘(27) information about, and a separate state5 ment of amounts in, the Health Care Reform Trust

6 Fund.’’.

Æ