alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2015047EN.01000401.xml

| 10.2.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 47/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.2.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 47/4

---

Notice of the impending expiry of certain anti-dumping measures

(2015/C 47/04)

1.   As provided for in Article 11(2) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009 of 30 November 2009 on protection against dumped imports from countries not members of the European Community (1), the Commission gives notice that, unless a review is initiated in accordance with the following procedure, the anti-dumping measures mentioned below will expire on the date mentioned in the table below.

1

2.   Procedure

Procedure

Union producers may lodge a written request for a review. This request must contain sufficient evidence that the expiry of the measures would be likely to result in a continuation or recurrence of dumping and injury.

Should the Commission decide to review the measures concerned, importers, exporters, representatives of the exporting country and Union producers will then be provided with the opportunity to amplify, rebut or comment on the matters set out in the review request.

3.   Time limit

Time limit

Union producers may submit a written request for a review on the above basis, to reach the European Commission, Directorate-General for Trade (Unit H-1), CHAR 4/39, 1000 Brussels, Belgium (2) at any time from the date of the publication of the present notice but no later than three months before the date mentioned in the table below.

2

4.   This notice is published in accordance with Article 11(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009.

| Product | Country(ies) of origin or exportation | Measures | Reference | Date of expiry (3) |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Certain aluminium road wheels | The People’s Republic of China | Anti-dumping duty | Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 964/2010 imposing definitive anti-dumping duties on imports of certain aluminium road wheels originating in the People’s Republic of China (OJ L 282, 28.10.2010, p. 1) | 29.10.2015 |

Product

Country(ies) of origin or exportation

Measures

Reference

Date of expiry (3)

3

Certain aluminium road wheels

The People’s Republic of China

Anti-dumping duty

Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 964/2010 imposing definitive anti-dumping duties on imports of certain aluminium road wheels originating in the People’s Republic of China (OJ L 282, 28.10.2010, p. 1)

29.10.2015

---

(1)  OJ L 343, 22.12.2009, p. 51.

1

(2)  Fax +32 22956505.

2

(3)  The measure expires at midnight of the day mentioned in this column.

3

---
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      EXHIBIT 23

                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS


We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 33-98038, 333-12097, 333-50639, 333-60869,
333-68205 and 333-48350) of Gadzooks, Inc. of our report dated March 8, 2001
relating to the financial statements, which appears in the Annual Report to
Shareholders, which is incorporated in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.


/s/ Pricewaterhousecoopers LLP

Fort Worth, Texas
April 30, 2001
| (1)  | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|-----------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2)  | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|-----------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date: May 11, 2011 | By:       /s/ Timothy P. Halter                    |
|--------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|               | Timothy P. Halter                                                                                                                                                          |
|               | Chief Executive Officer                                                                                                                                                    |
|               | and Chief Financial Officer                                                                                                                                                |

----
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 3640

To direct the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency to establish an office in a community in the United States located not more

than 10 miles from the border between the United States and Mexico.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

NOVEMBER 22, 1993

Mr. FILNER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Merchant Marine and Fisheries

A BILL

To direct the Administrator of the Environmental Protection

Agency to establish an office in a community in the

United States located not more than 10 miles from the

border between the United States and Mexico.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. ESTABLISHMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PRO4 TECTION AGENCY OFFICE ON UNITED

5 STATES-MEXICO BORDER.

6 (a) ESTABLISHMENT.—Not later than 1 year after

7 the date of the enactment of this Act, the Administrator
2

•HR 3640 IH

1 of the Environmental Protection Agency shall establish an

2 office in a community in the United States that is—

3 (1) located in the area of the United States

4 that is not more than 10 miles from the border be5 tween the United States and Mexico, and

6 (2) the largest city in that area.

7 (b) REGIONAL ADMINISTRATOR.—The head of the of8 fice established under this section shall be the Regional

9 Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency for

10 the region of the United States located generally along the

11 border between the United States and Mexico.

12 (c) FUNCTIONS.—The Administrator of the Environ13 mental Protection Agency shall delegate to the Regional

14 Administrator referred to in subsection (b) the functions

15 of the Administrator relating to—

16 (1) administering activities conducted by the

17 Environmental Protection Agency in the region of

18 the United States located generally along the border

19 between the United States and Mexico; and

20 (2) coordinating, and cooperating with the Gov21 ernment of Mexico in, the implementation of pro22 grams of the Environmental Protection Agency re23 lating to transboundary hazardous waste and air,

24 soil, and water quality problems, including—
3

•HR 3640 IH

1 (A) programs to counter impacts of trade

2 agreements between the United States and

3 Mexico, and

4 (B) programs conducted pursuant to the

5 1983 Border Environmental Agreement be6 tween the United States and Mexico.

Æ
# C_2015005EN.01000601.xml

| 9.1.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 5/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.1.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 5/6

---

Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union

Cases where the Commission raises no objections

(Text with EEA relevance, except for products falling under Annex I of the Treaty)

(2015/C 005/02)

| Date of adoption of the decision | 07.11.2014 |
| --- | --- |
| Aid number | SA.38916 (2014/N) |
| Member State | Germany |
| Region | BERLIN | — |
| Title (and/or name of the beneficiary) | BERLIN: Entfernung und Beseitigung von Falltieren |
| Legal basis | Gesetz zur Ausführung des Tierkörperbeseitigungsgesetzes vom 6.11.1997
  Gesetz zur Änderung des Gesetzes zur Ausführung des Tierkörperbeseitiugungsgesetzes vom 28.3.2002
  Gesetz zur Änderung des Gesetzes zur Ausführung des Tierkörperbeseitigungsgesetzes |
| Type of measure | Scheme | — |
| Objective | Fallen stock |
| Form of aid | Subsidised services |
| Budget | Overall budget: EUR 1,82 (in millions)
  Annual budget: EUR 0,26 (in millions) |
| Intensity | 66,6 % |
| Duration (period) | until 31.12.2020 |
| Economic sectors | AGRICULTURE; FORESTRY AND FISHING |
| Name and address of the granting authority | Senatsverwaltung für Justiz und Verbraucherschutz; Referat: V B; Herr Dr. Zucker |
| Salzburger Straße 21-25; D-10820 Berlin |

Date of adoption of the decision

07.11.2014

Aid number

SA.38916 (2014/N)

Member State

Germany

Region

BERLIN

—

Title (and/or name of the beneficiary)

BERLIN: Entfernung und Beseitigung von Falltieren

Legal basis

Gesetz zur Ausführung des Tierkörperbeseitigungsgesetzes vom 6.11.1997

Gesetz zur Änderung des Gesetzes zur Ausführung des Tierkörperbeseitiugungsgesetzes vom 28.3.2002

Gesetz zur Änderung des Gesetzes zur Ausführung des Tierkörperbeseitigungsgesetzes

Type of measure

Scheme

—

Objective

Fallen stock

Form of aid

Subsidised services

Budget

Overall budget: EUR 1,82 (in millions)

Annual budget: EUR 0,26 (in millions)

Intensity

66,6 %

Duration (period)

until 31.12.2020

Economic sectors

AGRICULTURE; FORESTRY AND FISHING

Name and address of the granting authority

Senatsverwaltung für Justiz und Verbraucherschutz; Referat: V B; Herr Dr. Zucker

Salzburger Straße 21-25; D-10820 Berlin

Other information

—

The authentic text(s) of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found at:

http://ec.europa.eu/competition/elojade/isef/index.cfm

---
#### In re the ESTATE of Garfield A. WOOD, Deceased. John S. CHOWNING and the Miami Beach First National Bank, as Executors of the Estate of Garfield A. Wood, Deceased, et al., Petitioners, v. Garfield A. WOOD, Jr., Respondent.

No. 43348.

Supreme Court of Florida.

May 23, 1973.

Rehearing Denied June 27, 1973.

Woodrow M. Melvin, Jr., and Mark V. Silverio, of Mershon, Sawyer, Johnston, Dunwody & Cole, Miami, for petitioners.

Edwin O. Simon of Redfearn & Simon and Wm. J. Pruitt, Miami, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

This cause is before us to review the decision of the District Court of Appeal, Third District, reported at 271 So.2d 42, a decision certified by the District Court as passing on a question of great public interest, recited by that Court as follows:

> “[D]oes an amended petition for revocation of a will which contains a renunciation of righ,t to take under the will relate back to the time of the filing of the first petition which did not contain a. renunciation, so that the renunciation is timely even though the statutory time for the filing of a renunciation expired prior to the filing of the amended petition?”

We have jurisdiction of the cause under the authority of Section 3(b) (3), Article V, Constitution of Florida, F.S.A., F.A.R. 4.6, 32 F.S.A.

After argument and upon consideration of the record and briefs, we hold that the District Court of Appeal has correctly decided the cause and its decision is adopted as the ruling of this Court.

Accordingly, certiorari is discharged.

It is so ordered.

CARLTON, C. J., and ERVIN, ADKINS, BOYD and DREW (Retired), JJ., concur.
#### Franklin Thomas DRAPER, Appellant, v. STATE of FLORIDA, Appellee.

No. R-341.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

June 7, 1973.

Rehearing Denied July 9, 1973.

Louis O. Frost, Jr., Public Defender, Thomas C. Turner and James 0. Brecher, Asst. Public Defenders, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., William E. Whitlock, III, and Enoch J. Whitney, Asst. Attys. Gen., for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

This cause having been orally argued before the Court, the briefs and record on appeal having been read and given full consideration, and the appellant having failed to demonstrate reversible error, the judgment of the lower court appealed from herein is affirmed. See Green v. State, 76 So.2d 645 (Fla.1954).

CARROLL, DONALD K., Acting C. J., and RAWLS and JOHNSON, JJ., concur.
SWINGPLANE VENTURES, INC.





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. Section 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





Pursuant to Section 906 of the Public Company Accounting Reform and Investor Protection Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted), I, Donald Ray Lamont Wanner Sr., Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer  of Swingplane Ventures, Inc. (the "Company"), hereby certify that, to the best of my knowledge:





1.
The Company's Interim Report on Form 10-Q for the nine month period ended March 31, 2015 to which this Certification is attached as Exhibit 32 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





2.
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the end of the period covered by the Report.





DATE: May 15, 2015
By:
/s/Donald Ray Lamont Wanner Sr.Name:
Donald Ray Lamont Wanner Sr.Title:
Chief Executive Officer & Chief Financial Officer(Principal Executive Officer)

(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)




A signed original of this written statement required by Section 1350 of Title 18 of the United States Code has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





The foregoing certification is being furnished as an exhibit to the Report pursuant to Item 601(b)(32) of Regulation S-K and Section 1350 of Title 18 of the United States Code and, accordingly, is not being filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission as part of the Report and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (whether made before or after the date of the Report, irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.)
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3112 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3112

To authorize the Secretary of Transportation to issue a certificate of 
   documentation with appropriate endorsement for the vessel GAZELA.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 21, 1993

Mr. Foglietta introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
               Committee on Merchant Marine and Fisheries

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To authorize the Secretary of Transportation to issue a certificate of 
   documentation with appropriate endorsement for the vessel GAZELA.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled, That notwithstanding 
section 27 of the Merchant Marine Act, 1920 (46 App. U.S.C. 883) and 
sections 12106, 12107, and 12108 of title 46, United States Code, the 
Secretary of Transportation may issue a certificate of documentation 
with appropriate endorsement for the vessel GAZELA (United States 
official number 23-7272425).

                                 <all>
```
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 5.1

                    [GOODWIN, PROCTER & HOAR LLP LETTERHEAD]

                               September 19, 2000

Moldflow Corporation
91 Hartwell Avenue
Lexington, Massachusetts  02421

Ladies and Gentlemen:

         Re:      REGISTRATION STATEMENT ON FORM S-8

         This opinion is delivered in our capacity as counsel to Moldflow
Corporation (the "Company") in connection with the preparation and filing with
the Securities and Exchange Commission under the Securities Act of 1933, as
amended (the "Act") of a Registration Statement on Form S-8 (the "Registration
Statement") relating to 2,551,701 shares of Common Stock, par value $.01 per
share (the "Registered Shares") which the Company may issue pursuant to the
Moldflow Corporation 2000 Stock Option and Incentive Plan and the Moldflow
Corporation 1997 Equity Incentive Plan (the "Plans").

         As counsel for the Company, we have examined copies of the Plans and
the Company's Third Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation and Second
Amended and Restated By-laws, each as presently in effect, and such records,
certificates and other documents of the Company as we have deemed necessary or
appropriate for the purposes of this opinion.

         We are attorneys admitted to practice in The Commonwealth of
Massachusetts. We express no opinion concerning the laws of any jurisdiction
other than the laws of the United States of America, The Commonwealth of
Massachusetts and the Delaware General Corporation Law.

         Based on the foregoing, we are of the opinion that upon the issuance
and delivery of the Registered Shares against payment therefor in accordance
with the terms of the Plan and any agreement thereunder, the Registered Shares
will be legally issued, fully paid and non-assessable shares of the Company's
Common Stock under the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware.

         The foregoing assumes all requisite steps will be taken to comply with
the requirements of the Act, applicable requirements of state laws regulating
the offer and sale of securities and applicable requirements of The Nasdaq Stock
Market, Inc.

         We hereby consent to being named as counsel to the Company in the
Registration Statement and to the inclusion of this opinion as an exhibit to the
Registration Statement.

                                       Very truly yours,

                                       /s/ Goodwin, Procter & Hoar LLP

                                       GOODWIN, PROCTER & HOAR LLP
Exhibit 32.1   CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Quarterly Report of Plaster Caster Inc. (the Company) on Form 10Q for the three month period ended March 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Peter Klamka, President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that;  1.   The Report fully complies with the requirement of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and  2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.   /s/ Name:  Peter Klamka Title:    President  Date:    May 16, 2011
Exhibit 23.1

INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

The
Board of Directors
Credit Suisse First Boston (USA), Inc.:

We
consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statements (File Nos. 333-86720, 333-71850, 333-62422, 333-07657,
333-34149, 333-53499, 333-73405 and 333-30928) on Form S-3 of Credit Suisse First Boston (USA), Inc. (formerly known as
Donaldson, Lufkin & Jenrette, Inc.) of our report dated February 19, 2003, with respect to the consolidated statements of financial condition of Credit Suisse First Boston
(USA), Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2002 and 2001, and the related consolidated statements of operations, changes in stockholders' equity and cash flows for each of the years
in the three-year period ended December 31, 2002, and the related financial statement schedule, which report appears in the December 31, 2002 annual report on
Form 10-K of Credit Suisse First Boston (USA), Inc.



New
York, New York
March 27, 2003

---

QuickLinks
EXHIBIT 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. {section} 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of China Highlands Limited (the "Company") on Form 10-Q/A for the period ending March 31, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Jeremy Mork, Chief Executive and Financial  Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. {section} 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes- Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



|Dated:  May 13, 2011
By  /s/ Jeremy Mork
-----------------------------
    Jeremy Mork
    Chief Executive and  Financial Officer
   (Principal Executive and Financial Officer)
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
## 

EXHIBIT 23.2

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in this Form S-3 Registration Statement of our
reports dated April 28, 2000 included in the Bioject Medical Technologies, Inc. Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2000 and to all
references to our Firm included in this Registration Statement.

/s/
Arthur Andersen, LLP

Portland,
Oregon
August 24, 2000

---

## QuickLinks
#### Johnnie BELL, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

No. R-448.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Sept. 14, 1972.

Johnnie Bell, in pro. per.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

Petitioner Bell seeks a writ of mandamus directing the Clerk of the Circuit Court for Volusia County to furnish him with a trial transcript. In Bell v. State, 222 So.2d 269 (1 Fla.App.1969), this Court reversed this cause for the purpose of the trial court conducting an evidentiary hearing upon Bell’s contention that his court-appointed counsel refused to institute an appeal from the judgment of conviction. Now Bell insists that he is entitled to a trial transcript by reason of the Supreme Court’s decision in Hollingshead v. Wainwright, 194 So.2d 577 (Fla.1967). It is elementary that a complete trial transcript is not required to be furnished petitioner until he establishes the overriding fact that *394he has been deprived of a direct appeal by State action. The instant petition is dismissed without prejudice to petitioner to file a petition in the trial court pursuant to our prior opinion in Bell v. State, supra.

SPECTOR, C. J., and RAWLS and JOHNSON, JJ., concur.
#### FLORIDA WIRE & RIGGING WORKS, INC., Appellant, v. DREDGE MANUFACTURING CORP., Appellees.

No. 71-26.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

April 13, 1971.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed.
# C_2014389EN.01002002.xml

| 4.11.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 389/20 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.11.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 389/20

---

Information communicated by Member States regarding closure of fisheries

2014/C 389/10

In accordance with Article 35(3) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1224/2009 of 20 November 2009 establishing a Community control system for ensuring compliance with the rules of the common fisheries policy (1), a decision has been taken to close the fishery as set down in the following table:

1

| Date and time of closure | 11.10.2014 |
| --- | --- |
| Duration | 11.10.2014-31.12.2014 |
| Member State | Belgium |
| Stock or Group of stocks | SRX/67AKXD |
| Species | Skates and rays (Rajiformes) |
| Zone | Union waters of VIa, VIb, VIIa-c and VIIe-k |
| Type(s) of fishing vessels | — |
| Reference number | 64/TQ43 |

Date and time of closure

11.10.2014

Duration

11.10.2014-31.12.2014

Member State

Belgium

Stock or Group of stocks

SRX/67AKXD

Species

Skates and rays (Rajiformes)

Rajiformes

Zone

Union waters of VIa, VIb, VIIa-c and VIIe-k

Type(s) of fishing vessels

—

Reference number

64/TQ43

---

(1)  OJ L 343, 22.12.2009, p. 1.

1

---