alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>
                                                            Exhibit 15



September 20, 2000

Enhance Financial Services Group Inc.
335 Madison Avenue
New York, New York

We have made a review, in accordance with standards established by the
American Institute of Certified Public Accountants, of the unaudited interim
financial information of Enhance Financial Services Group Inc. and
subsidiaries for the periods ended June 30, 2000 and 1999, as indicated in
our report dated August 14, 2000; because we did not perform an audit, we
expressed no opinion on that information.

We are aware that our report referred to above, which is included in your
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A for the quarter ended June 30, 2000, is
incorporated by reference in Registration Statement No. 333-93275 on Form S-8
and Registration Statement No. 333-47895 on Form S-3.

We also are aware that the aforementioned report, pursuant to Rule 436(c) under
the Securities Act of 1933, is not considered a part of the Registration
Statement prepared or certified by an accountant or a report prepared or
certified by an accountant within the meaning of Sections 7 and 11 of that Act.


/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
New York, New York
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 3507

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide a tax exemption

for health risk pools.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

NOVEMBER 15, 1993

Mr. PARKER (for himself, Mr. MONTGOMERY, Mr. WHITTEN, Mr. OBERSTAR,

Mr. HANCOCK, Mr. JEFFERSON, Mr. PENNY, Mr. SABO, Mr. EMERSON,

Mr. TAUZIN, Mr. LIVINGSTON, Mr. FIELDS of Louisiana, Mr. THOMPSON

of Mississippi, Mr. TAYLOR of Mississippi, and Mr. POMEROY) introduced

the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and

Means

A BILL

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide

a tax exemption for health risk pools.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That (a) subsection (c) of section 501 of the Internal Rev4 enue Code of 1986 (relating to list of exempt organiza5 tions) is amended by adding at the end thereof the follow6 ing new paragraph:

7 ‘‘(26) Any corporation, association, or similar

8 legal entity which is created by any State or political
2

•HR 3507 IH

1 subdivision thereof to establish a risk pool to provide

2 health insurance coverage to any person unable to

3 obtain health insurance coverage in the private in4 surance market because of health conditions and no

5 part of the net earnings of which inures to the bene6 fit of any private shareholder, member, or individ7 ual.’’

8 (b) The amendment made by subsection (a) shall

9 apply to taxable years beginning after December 31, 1989.

Æ
# C_2011328EN.01000101.xml

| 11.11.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 328/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.11.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 328/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.6387 — Buchen Industrieservice/Thyssenkrupp Xervon)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2011/C 328/01

On 7 November 2011, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in German and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32011M6387. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32011M6387. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.

---
# C_2015038EN.01000301.xml

| 4.2.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 38/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.2.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 38/3

---

Notice for the attention of the data subjects to whom the restrictive measures provided for in Council Regulation (EU) No 101/2011, as implemented by Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/147, concerning restrictive measures directed against certain persons and entities in view of the situation in Tunisia apply

(2015/C 38/04)

The attention of data subjects is drawn to the following information in accordance with Article 12 of Regulation (EC) No 45/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council (1):

1

The legal basis for this processing operation is Council Regulation (EU) No 101/2011 (2), as implemented by Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/147 (3).

2

3

The controller of this processing operation is the Council of the European Union represented by the Director-General of DG C (Foreign Affairs, Enlargement, Civil Protection) of the General Secretariat of the Council and the department entrusted with the processing operation is the Unit 1C of DG C that can be contacted at:

| Council of the European Union |
| --- |
| General Secretariat |
| DG C 1C |
| Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175 |
| 1048 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |
| E-mail: sanctions@consilium.europa.eu |

Council of the European Union

General Secretariat

DG C 1C

Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175

1048 Bruxelles/Brussel

BELGIQUE/BELGIË

E-mail: sanctions@consilium.europa.eu

The purpose of the processing operation is the establishment and updating of the list of persons subject to restrictive measures in accordance with Regulation (EU) No 101/2011, as implemented by Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/147.

The data subjects are the natural persons who fulfil listing criteria as laid down in that Regulation.

The personal data collected includes data necessary for the correct identification of the person concerned, the Statement of Reasons and any other data related thereto.

The personal data collected may be shared as necessary with the European External Action Service and the Commission.

Without prejudice to restrictions provided for in Article 20(1)(a) and (d) of Regulation (EC) No 45/2001, requests for access, as well as requests for rectification or objection will be answered in accordance with Section 5 of Council Decision 2004/644/EC (4).

4

Personal data will be retained for five years from the moment the data subject has been removed from the list of persons subject to the asset freeze or the validity of the measure has expired, or for the duration of court proceedings in the event they had been started.

Data subjects may have recourse to the European Data Protection Supervisor in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 45/2001.

---

(1)  OJ L 8, 12.1.2001, p. 1.

1

(2)  OJ L 31, 5.2.2011, p. 1.

2

(3)  OJ L 26, 31.1.2015, p. 3.

3

(4)  OJ L 296, 21.9.2004, p. 16.

4

---
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JULIAN VARGAS,

 Plaintiff - Appellant,

 v.

D. WABAKKEN, Correctional Lieutenant,

in his/her official capacity,

 Defendant - Appellee.

No. 09-55609

D.C. No. 5:08-cv-00822-VBF-SS

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Central District of California

Valerie Baker Fairbank, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted May 25, 2010** 

Before: CANBY, THOMAS, and W. FLETCHER, Circuit Judges. 

Julian Vargas, a California state prisoner, appeals pro se from the district

court’s judgment dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 due process action arising from

a prison disciplinary charge for the possession of heroin. We have jurisdiction

FILED

JUN 17 2010

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 09-55609

under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo. Sacks v. Office of Foreign Assets

Control, 466 F.3d 764, 770 (9th Cir. 2006). We affirm.

The district court properly dismissed Vargas’s due process claim because he

failed to allege facts in his second amended complaint that implicate a

constitutionally-protected liberty or property interest. See Sandin v. Conner, 515

U.S. 472, 487 (1995) (a misconduct record that will not inevitably affect future

parole decisions “is simply too attenuated to invoke the procedural guarantees of

the Due Process Clause.”). To the extent Vargas contends the misconduct report

resulted in a loss of good time credits that will affect the duration of his sentence,

his claim is Heck-barred. See Heck v. Humphrey, 512 U.S. 477, 486-87 (1994)

(barring section 1983 actions when judgment in favor of the plaintiff would

necessarily imply the invalidity of a sentence not otherwise invalidated). 

Contrary to Vargas’s contention, the district court did not abuse its

discretion by denying further leave to amend. See Miller v. Yokohama Tire Corp.,

358 F.3d 616, 622 (9th Cir. 2004) (“Where the plaintiff has previously filed an

amended complaint . . . the district court’s discretion to deny leave to amend is

particularly broad.”) (citation and internal quotation marks omitted).

Vargas’s remaining contentions are unpersuasive. 

AFFIRMED.
#### Joseph Whitney PIERRE, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. ST. PAUL FIRE & MARINE INSURANCE CO. et al., Defendants-Appellees.

No. 3851.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Third Circuit.

May 18, 1972.

Laborde & St. Romain, by P. J. LaBorde, Jr., Marskville, for plaintiff-appellant.

Provosty & Sadler, by LeDoux R. Pro-vosty, Jr., Alexandria, for defendants-ap-pellees.

Before FRUGÉ, SAVOY and DO-MENGEAUX, JJ.

DOMENGEAUX, Judge.

This case having been called for argument in the manner and at the time prescribed in the Uniform Rules of the Courts of Appeal, Rule V, Section 4, and the appellant having neither appeared nor filed a brief prior to the time the case was called for argument, the appeal is considered abandoned and is dismissed at appellant’s cost. Uniform Rules, Courts of Appeal, Rule VII, Section 5(b), as revised June 1, 1971.

Appeal dismissed.
Exhibit 32.2
 
 Certification of Principal Financial Officer
 Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
 Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
 
 In connection with the Quarterly Report of PinstripesNY, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Clifford Teller, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:
 
 (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 /s/ Clifford Teller

Clifford Teller

Principal Financial Officer

November 24, 2010
RTN-12.31.2013-Exhibit 10.26




Exhibit 10.26 


SUMMARY OF RAYTHEON COMPANY EXECUTIVE SEVERANCE 
AND CHANGE IN CONTROL GUIDELINES 
 
Summary of Raytheon Company Executive Severance Guidelines 
 
The Company has Executive Severance Guidelines (the “Severance Guidelines”), which were updated by the Management Development and Compensation Committee (the “MDCC”) effective as of January 1, 2010. The Severance Guidelines provide for severance payments and continuation of benefits for certain officers for designated periods upon their separation from the Company. 
 
The Severance Guidelines provide for various levels of continued compensation and benefits for the Chief Executive Officer (a “Level 1 Executive”); executive/senior vice presidents and vice presidents who are presidents of the Company’s Business Units (“Level 2 Executives”); other elected officers (“Level 3 Executives”). 
 
For new executives beginning January 1, 2010: 
 
	
				
	 
	•
	 
	Level 1 Executive: (a) salary continuance of two (2) times the executive’s base salary and annual incentive bonus target and (b) the continuation of two (2) years of existing benefits (no perquisites).




 
	
				
	 
	•
	 
	Level 2 Executive: (a) salary continuance of one (1) times the executive’s base salary and annual incentive bonus target and (b) the continuation of one (1) year of existing benefits (no perquisites).




 
	
				
	 
	•
	 
	Level 3 Executive: (a) salary continuance of one (1) times the executive’s base salary and annual incentive bonus target and (b) the continuation of one (1) year of existing benefits (no perquisites).

	 
	 
	 
	 




For Level 1-3 Executives hired prior to January 1, 2010, the previous guidelines for severance payments and continuation of benefits will apply, except that post-severance perquisites will generally no longer be provided.  
 
Summary of Raytheon Company Executive Change in Control Guidelines 
 
In addition, the Company has Executive Change in Control Guidelines (the “Change in Control Guidelines”), which were updated by the Management Development and Compensation Committee (the “MDCC”) effective as of August 1, 2013. The Change in Control Guidelines provide for certain payments to certain officers upon a qualifying termination within two (2) years of a change in control of the Company pursuant to Change in Control Severance Agreements. 
 
The Change in Control Guidelines in effect before August 1, 2013, remain in effect for those executives in their role prior to that date.  However, under no circumstances will an executive receive any post-termination perquisites or any 280G excise tax gross-ups under any Change in Control Severance Agreement.
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 23.5

                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

We consent to the reference to our firm under the caption "Experts" and to the
use of our report dated February 23, 2000, in the Registration Statement
(Form S-1 No. 33-XXXXX) and related Prospectus of Linc.net Inc. for the
registration of XX,XXX,XXX shares of its common stock.

<TABLE>
<S>                                           <C>
                                              VIRCHOW, KRAUSE & COMPANY, LLP

                                              /s/ VIRCHOW, KRAUSE & COMPANY, LLP
</TABLE>

Madison, Wisconsin
September 8, 2000
----

|               |   |   |   |                                                                                                     |
|--------------------|--------|--------|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Date: May 13, 2011 |   | By:    |   | /s/    James K. Price                        |
|               |   |   |   | James K. Price                                                                                           |
|               |   |   |   | Chief Executive Officer                                                                                  |
|               |   |   |
| Date: May 13, 2011 |   | By:    |   | /s/    J. Miguel Fernandez de Castro         |
|               |   |   |   | J. Miguel Fernandez de Castro                                                                            |
|               |   |   |   | Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer                                                        |
#### LONG ISLAND INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellant, v. LE-BERT INTERNATIONAL, INC., Appellee.

No. 77-584.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Sept. 20, 1977.

Rehearing Denied Oct. 14, 1977.

Michael P. Weisberg, Jeanne Heyward, Miami, for appellant.

Bryson & Berman and Mark S. Berman, Miami, for appellee.

Before BARKDULL, HAVERFIELD and NATHAN, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See: *Acme Fast Freight, Inc. v. Bell,*318 So.2d 212 (Fla. 3d D.C.A. 1975); *Cal-U-Sonic*v. *Metric Systems Corporation,*330 So.2d 63 (Fla. 1st D.C.A. 1976); Overseas *Development, Inc. v. Dominion Mortgage Corporation,*330 So.2d 845 (Fla. 3d D.C.A. 1976); *Bay Products Corporation*v. *Winters,*341 So.2d 240 (Fla. 3d D.C.A. 1976).
EXHIBIT 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. {section} 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of China Rising Star Limited (the "Company") on Form 10-Q/A for the period ending March 31, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Jeremy Mork, Chief Executive and Financial  Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. {section} 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes- Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



|Dated:  May 13, 2011
By  /s/ Jeremy Mork
-----------------------------
    Jeremy Mork
    Chief Executive and  Financial Officer
   (Principal Executive and Financial Officer)
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
EXHIBIT 32.1

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of The Singing Machine Company, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the year ended March 31, 2006 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Yi Ping
Chan, the Interim Chief Executive Officer and Chief Operating Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to The Singing Machine Company, Inc. and will be retained by The
Singing Machine Company, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.

                                        /S/ Yi Ping Chan
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Yi Ping Chan
                                        Interim Chief Executive Officer and
                                        Chief Operating Officer
                                        (Principal Executive Officer)

                                        Date: July 14, 2006
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000923877
<NAME> PAXSON COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> US DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                            1
<CASH>                                         125,189
<SECURITIES>                                   124,987
<RECEIVABLES>                                   44,324
<ALLOWANCES>                                     4,255
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               380,866
<PP&E>                                         262,902
<DEPRECIATION>                                  72,994
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,690,087
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          143,011
<BONDS>                                        228,694
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          949,807
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            63
<OTHER-SE>                                      96,658
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,690,087
<SALES>                                        248,362
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               248,362
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  473,613
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                57,908
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 6,164
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              50,286
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (217,629)
<INCOME-TAX>                                    57,257
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (160,372)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (314,579)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (5.10)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (5.10)


</TABLE>
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 2.12


                                                                 August 31, 2000

Mr. Craig Kussman
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Synavant Inc.

Dear Mr. Kussman

At the Distribution Date (as defined the Synavant Inc. Form 10), IMS Health
Incorporated ("IMS") shall provide for the benefit of Permail Pty. Limited
("Permail") credit support for a letter of credit issued by a bank for up to A$4
million in favor of the Australian post office ("Postage Guarantee"). To the
extent IMS pays out any amounts with respect to such Postage Guarantee, Synavant
Inc. shall reimburse IMS in the United States the US dollar equivalent of such
amounts within five business days of demand therefor accompanied by proof of
payment. This Postage Guarantee shall terminate upon the earlier of (a) one year
from the Distribution Date or (b) the transfer by Synavant of any portion of its
interest in Permail.

James C. Malone
Chief Financial Officer
IMS Health Incorporated

Agreed and Accepted:

Craig Kussman
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Synavant, Inc.

Cc:      Pricewaterhousecoopers
         Vickie Fash
         Wayne Yetter
EXHIBIT 32.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of IZEA Holdings, Inc., a Nevada corporation (the “Company”), on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2012 , as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Donna Mackenzie, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)           The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)           The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





Dated: May 15, 2012








/s/ Donna MackenzieDonna MackenzieChief Financial Officer(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)