alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2015006EN.01000201.xml

| 10.1.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 6/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.1.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 6/2

---

Notice for the attention of the persons subject to the restrictive measures provided for in Council Decision 2011/72/CFSP and Council Regulation (EU) No 101/2011 concerning restrictive measures directed against certain persons, entities and bodies in view of the situation in Tunisia

(2015/C 6/02)

The following information is brought to the attention of the persons that appear in the Annex to Council Decision 2011/72/CFSP (1), and in Annex I to Council Regulation (EU) No 101/2011 (2), concerning restrictive measures directed against certain persons, entities and bodies in view of the situation in Tunisia.

1

2

The Council intends to renew the restrictive measures provided for in Decision 2011/72/CFSP. The Council holds on its file new elements concerning all persons listed in the Annex to Decision 2011/72/CFSP and in Annex I to Regulation (EU) No 101/2011.The persons concerned are hereby informed that they may submit a request to the Council to obtain the information that relates to them, before 15 January 2015, to the following address:

| Council of the European Union |
| --- |
| General Secretariat |
| DG C 1C |
| Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175 |
| 1048 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |
| E-mail: sanctions@consilium.europa.eu |

Council of the European Union

General Secretariat

DG C 1C

Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175

1048 Bruxelles/Brussel

BELGIQUE/BELGIË

E-mail: sanctions@consilium.europa.eu

Any observations received will be taken into account for the purpose of the Council's periodic review, in accordance with Article 5 of Decision 2011/72/CFSP and Article 12(4) of Regulation (EU) No 101/2011.

---

(1)  OJ L 28, 2.2.2011, p. 62.

1

(2)  OJ L 31, 5.2.2011, p. 1.

2

---
BRIAN QUINN

Chief Justice

JAMES T. CAMPBELL

Justice

MACKEY K. HANCOCK

Justice

PATRICK A. PIRTLE

Justice

Court of Appeals

Seventh District of Texas

Potter County Courts Building

501 S. Fillmore, Suite 2-A

Amarillo, Texas 79101-2449

www.txcourts.gov/7thcoa.aspx

VIVIAN LONG

Clerk

MAILING ADDRESS:

P. O. Box 9540

79105-9540

(806) 342-2650

June 9, 2015

Stan Schwieger

LAW OFFICE OF STAN SCHWIEGER

P.O. Box 975

Waco, TX 76703

* DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL *

Brodie Burks

Assistant County and District Attorney

200 W. State Street

Groesbeck, TX 76642

* DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL *

RE: Case Number: 07-14-00278-CR, 07-14-00279-CR

Trial Court Case Number: 13,184-A, 13,185-A

Style: Teddie Davenport v. The State of Texas

Dear Counsel:

By Order of the Court, Appellant’s Motion for Rehearing is this day overruled.

Very truly yours,

Vivian Long

VIVIAN LONG, CLERK

xc: Honorable Patrick H. Simmons (DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL)

Carol Jenkins (DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL)

FILE COPY
2008 Decisions

Opinions of the United

States Court of Appeals

for the Third Circuit

9-18-2008

Ryncavage v. Amer Family Life Ins

Precedential or Non-Precedential: Non-Precedential

Docket No. 07-4013

Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2008

This decision is brought to you for free and open access by the Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit at Villanova

University School of Law Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in 2008 Decisions by an authorized administrator of Villanova

University School of Law Digital Repository. For more information, please contact Benjamin.Carlson@law.villanova.edu.

Recommended Citation

"Ryncavage v. Amer Family Life Ins" (2008). 2008 Decisions. Paper 516.

http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2008/516
NOT PRECEDENTIAL

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

___________

No. 07-4013

___________

JOSEPH RYNCAVAGE,

 Appellant

v.

AMERICAN FAMILY LIFE INSURANCE

COMPANY OF COLUMBUS, INC.;

AMERICAN FAMILY LIFE INSURANCE

COMPANY OF NEW YORK, INC.

___________

On Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Middle District of Pennsylvania

(D.C. Civil No. 06-cv-01711)

Magistrate Judge: The Honorable Malachy E. Mannion

___________

Submitted Under Third Circuit LAR 34.1(a)

September 9, 2008

Before: SLOVITER, FUENTES, and NYGAARD, Circuit Judges.

(Filed: September 18, 2008)

___________

OPINION OF THE COURT

___________

NYGAARD, Circuit Judge.
2

In Pennsylvania, a breach of contract claim has a statute of limitations of four

years. 42 Pa. Cons.Stat. Ann. § 5525(a)(8). The District Court dismissed Appellant

Joseph Ryncavage’s complaint pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6) because it was filed

after the applicable statute of limitations had run on his breach of contract claims. 

Ryncavage is an independent contractor who sold insurance for the Appellee

company. The issue in his action is over commissions Ryncavage contends he was to

receive. Ryncavage’s amended complaint indicates that he “was notified via a letter on

July 30, 2002 . . . confirming that his new business commissions and renewals would

cease effective August 29, 2002.” The record also reflects that the Appellee specifically

notified Ryncavage that “effective August 29, 2002, you will not [sic] longer receive

commissions on new business.” Ryncavage sued the Appellee for breach of contract, but

filed his original complaint on August 31, 2006. 

Ryncavage argues that the District Court erred by not extending the statute of

limitations past August 29, 2006, because his new commission payments were not

anticipated until some later, uncertain date. He also argues that the Appellee’s letter of

July 30, 2002, could be treated as an anticipatory repudiation and that he was entitled to

await Appellee’s failure to perform before filing suit. 

We have reviewed the briefs filed by the parties and conclude that, essentially for

the reasons set forth by the District Court, its judgment will be affirmed.
1

Kelly, Shaheerah

From: Tony Jaegel <TJaegel@spi-ind.com>

Sent: Friday, April 18, 2014 3:30 PM

To: Kelly, Shaheerah

Subject: Recent Biomass vs. Forest Slash Study

Shaheerah, here’s the link to the video I mentioned:  http://vimeo.com/89771199

Link to the Placer County information is here: http://www.placer.ca.gov/departments/air/apcdbiomass  

Have a nice weekend.  

Tony Jaegel 

Director of Environmental Affairs

Sierra Pacific Industries 

Bus: (530) 378‐8179

Fax: (530) 378‐8139

tjaegel@spi‐ind.com
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 June 24, 2014

d0616

Order 

Clerk

June 24, 2014

148712

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 148712

COA: 310146

Wayne CC: 12-000454-FH

LEE ALLEN MASZATICS,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the December 19, 2013 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3692 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3692

    To limit the amount an Executive agency may obligate for office 
furniture and decorating in fiscal years after fiscal year 1994, and to 
    rescind amounts available for that purpose for fiscal year 1994.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           November 22, 1993

 Mr. Santorum introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                   Committee on Government Operations

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To limit the amount an Executive agency may obligate for office 
furniture and decorating in fiscal years after fiscal year 1994, and to 
    rescind amounts available for that purpose for fiscal year 1994.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. LIMITATION ON AMOUNTS OBLIGATED FOR FURNITURE AND 
              DECORATING.

    The amount obligated by an Executive agency in a fiscal year after 
fiscal year 1994 for office furniture and decorating may not exceed the 
amount obligated by the agency in fiscal year 1994 for furniture and 
decorating.

SEC. 2. RESCISSION OF AMOUNTS AVAILABLE FOR OFFICE FURNITURE AND 
              DECORATING.

    Of the funds made available in appropriations Acts for fiscal year 
1994 to each Executive agency for purposes of office furniture and 
decorating, 25 percent of the unobligated balance is rescinded. The 
Director of the Office of Management and Budget shall allocate such 
rescission among the appropriate accounts, and shall submit to the 
Congress a report setting forth such allocation.

SEC. 3. EXECUTIVE AGENCY DEFINED.

    In this Act, the term ``Executive agency'' has the meaning given 
that term in section 105 of title 5, United States Code.

                                 <all>
```
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS



We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference this Registration Statement
on Form S-8 of our report dated January 25, 2000 relating to the financial
statements and financial statement schedules, which appears in The Cobalt Group,
Inc.'s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1999.



/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Seattle, Washington
September 6, 2000
EXHIBIT 32.2





CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER





PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)





In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2017 (the “Report”) of New Mountain Finance Corporation (the “Registrant”), as filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Shiraz Y. Kajee, the Chief Financial Officer of the Registrant, hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge, that:





|    |                                                                                                                                  
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

|    |                                                                                                                                                        
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.




/s/ SHIRAZ Y. KAJEEName:Shiraz Y. KajeeDate:August 8, 2017
#### STATE of Florida, Appellant, v. Tito CARINCI, Appellee.

No. 71-1083.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Feb. 11, 1972.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed.
# U ni te d S ta te s Co ur t of A pp ea ls For the Eig hth Circu it

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ _ No. 1 8- 20 37

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ _ And rew St ep he n Wil li am s ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll lPla in ti

ff - App el la nt

v. Mi nn es ot a Dep art m en t o f Co rrec ti on s; Tom Ro y ; Ed di e Mi le s; Mi nn es ot a Co rrec ti on al Faci li ty-Fari baul t, Ma il ro om Depa rtment; Mi nn es ot a Co rrec ti on al Faci li ty-Fari baul t, Pro pe rty Depart m en t; Ric e Co un ty; Cit y of F ari baul t; W as hi ng to n C ou nt y ; Ci ty of Baypo rt; Co un ty of Dak ot a; Cit y of Ha st in gs ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll lDefe nd

an ts - App el le es

__
__ __ __ __ __ App eal fro m

Uni te d S ta te s Di st ric t Co urt fo r th e Dis tri ctof M in ne so ta- Mi nn eap ol is

__
__ __ __ __ __ Subm it te d: May 1, 20 19 Fi le d: May 6, 20 19 [Unpubl is he d]

__ __ __ __ __ __ Befo re LOKEN, GRUEND ER, an d S HEPHERD, Circ ui t J ud ge s.

__ __ __ __ __ __ PER CURI AM.And rew W il li am s ap pe al s th e distr ic t co urt’s di sm is sa l of hi s pr o se co m pl ai nt
. 1 Hav in g care fu ll y rev ie wed th e reco rd as to th e cl ai m s W il li am s rai se s on ap pe al , an d th e pa rti es ’ arg um en ts on ap pe al , we fin d no ba si s fo r rev ers al

. See Pl ym o u t h Ct y . v. Mer sc or

p, In c., 77 4 F.3 d 11 55 , 11 58 (8 t h C i r . 2 0 14 ) (d e no vo rev ie w of Fed

. R. Ci v. P. 12 (b ) di sm is sa l ord er). Acco rd in gl y , th e jud gm en t is affi rm ed

. See 8t h Cir. R. 47 B.

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __

The Hon or ab le Jo an N. Eric ks en , Uni te d St at es Dis tri ct Ju dg e fo r th e Dis tri ct 1 of Mi nn es ot a, ad op ti ng th e rep ort an d reco mm en da ti on s of th e Hon or ab le Hil dy Bo wbe er, Un it edSta te s M ag is tra te Ju dg e fo r th e Dis tri ctof M in ne so ta
. -2

-
TNAV EX10.23.1# 12.31.2013 10Q




Exhibit 10.23.1#


AMENDMENT NO. 1
TO THE
EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT
BETWEEN
MICHAEL W. STRAMBI AND TELENAV, INC.




THIS AMENDMENT NO. 1 (“Amendment”), effective as of March 28, 2012 (“Amendment Effective Date”) supplements and amends the terms of the Employment Agreement, dated March 28, 2012 (“Agreement”), by and between Michael W. Strambi (“Executive”) and Telenav, Inc. (the “Company”).  Capitalized terms not otherwise defined shall have the meanings ascribed to them in the Agreement.


WHEREAS, the parties wish to correct an inadvertent omission in the Agreement.
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises and covenants contained in this Amendment, the parties agree as follows:


		
	1.
	At the end of Section 8(a)(i), after “(as in effect immediately prior to Executive’s termination)”, add “, and (B) a lump-sum pro-rated amount of Executive’s bonus for the year in which the termination occurs (adjusted as appropriate based on the extent to which any applicable performance objectives have then been achieved and the relative weightings thereof, each as determined in the sole and absolute discretion of the Board or Committee acting in good faith)”.




Except as modified and amended by this Amendment, the terms of the Agreement are ratified and confirmed by the parties hereto.  This Amendment is incorporated into and made a part of the Agreement by the parties.


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Amendment by their authorized representatives as of the Amendment Effective Date.


	
		
	MICHAEL W. STRAMBI


By: /s/ Michael W. Strambi
(Signature)


Name: Michael W. Strambi
(Printed Name)


Title: Chief Financial Officer


Date: 12/20/13 
	TELENAV, INC.


By: /s/ Loren E. Hillberg
(Signature)


Name: Loren E. Hillberg
(Printed Name)


Title: General Counsel


Date: 12/20/13






 

09/24/13
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 3551

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to require renal dialysis

facilities to make services available on a 24-hour basis as a condition

of participation under the medicare program.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

NOVEMBER 19, 1993

Mr. COLLINS of Georgia introduced the following bill; which was referred

jointly to the Committees on Ways and Means and Energy and Commerce

A BILL

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to require

renal dialysis facilities to make services available on a

24-hour basis as a condition of participation under the

medicare program.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Elizabeth A. Greeson

5 Dialysis Coverage Act of 1993’’.
2

•HR 3551 IH

1 SEC. 2. REQUIRING RENAL DIALYSIS FACILITIES TO MAKE

2 SERVICES AVAILABLE ON A 24-HOUR BASIS.

3 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 1881(b)(1) of the Social

4 Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1395rr(b)(1)) is amended by

5 striking the period at the end and inserting the following:

6 ‘‘, together with a requirement (in the case of a renal dial7 ysis facility) that the facility make institutional dialysis

8 services and supplies available on a 24-hour basis (either

9 directly or through arrangements with providers of serv10 ices or other renal dialysis facilities that meet the require11 ments of such subparagraph).’’.

12 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by

13 subsection (a) shall apply to items and services furnished

14 on or after January 1, 1994.

Æ
Exhibit 32.1  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In  connection  with the  Quarterly  Report of AAA BEST CAR RENTAL INC. (the "Company")  on Form 10-Q for the period  ended  April 30, 2011 as filed with the Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof (the  "Report"),  the undersigned,  in the  capacities  and  on  the  dates  indicated  below,  hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:  1.   The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  2.   The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations of the Company.  Date: August 9, 2011   /s/ Suresh Gupta __________________________ Suresh Gupta, President, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
##### 



Exhibit 31.1
 CERTIFICATION AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
      a.
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls
and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by
others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;b.
    
    Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal
control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide
reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation
of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles;c.
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls
and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such
evaluation; andd.
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the
registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control
over financial reporting; and
  a.
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;
andb.
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
 Date: November 13, 2006
    
    
    
    /s/ Robert J. KellerRobert J. KellerPresident and Chief Executive Officer
**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS**

    We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (No. 33-64937) and(No. 333-42415) of the Waters Instruments, Inc. 1995 Stock Option Plan and 1997 Associates Stock Purchase Plan, respectively, of our report dated July 28, 2000, on thefinancial statements of Waters Instruments, Inc., which report appears in the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended June 30, 2000. 

/s/McGladrey & Pullen, LLP 
**MCGLADREY & PULLEN, LLP**

Rochester,Minnesota
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATIONS OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Accelerated Acquisitions XII, Inc. (the “Company”) for the period ended June 30, 2012 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Quarterly Report”) and pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted), , Atonn F. Muhammad the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies that, to the best of his knowledge:





1. The Company’s Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





2. The information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition of the Company at the end of the periods covered by the Quarterly Report and the results of operations of the Company for the periods covered by the Quarterly Report.








August 14, 2012








/ S /Atonn F. MuhammadAtonn F. Muhammad

Chief Executive Officer







This certification accompanies the Form 10-Q to which it relates, is not deemed filed with the SEC and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, (whether made before or after the date of the Form 10-Q), irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.
561 S.E.2d 781

#### Carlos Demetrius MINOR, s/k/a Carlus Demetrius Minor, Appellant, v. COMMONWEALTH of Virginia, Appellee.

Record No. 1996-00-2.

Court of Appeals of Virginia.

April 9, 2002.

UPON REMAND FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF VIRGINIA

In accordance with the order of the Supreme Court of Virginia entered on October 23, 2001, the opinion previously-rendered by this Court on July 3, 2001 is withdrawn and the mandate entered on that date is vacated.

As further directed by the order of the Supreme Court, and in accordance with the decision of that Court in *Commonwealth v. Southerly,*262 Va. 294, 551 S.E.2d 650 (2001), the case is hereby transferred to the Supreme Court of Virginia pursuant to Code § 8.01-677.1.
#### Charles Heston SMITH, Appellant, v. Joseph Washington STOKES, Appellee.

No. 1099.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Fourth District.

March 15, 1968.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
#### A. H. MALCOM, Appellant, v. Sirman D. MARVIL and Hewitt E. Walker, Appellees.

No. 68-286.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Second District.

March 19, 1969.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.