alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2015055EN.01000201.xml

| 14.2.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 55/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.2.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 55/2

---

Notice for the attention of the data subjects to whom the restrictive measures provided for in Council Regulation (EU) No 267/2012 concerning restrictive measures against Iran apply

(2015/C 55/02)

The attention of data subjects is drawn to the following information in accordance with Article 12 of Regulation (EC) No 45/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council (1):

1

The legal basis for this processing operation is Regulation (EU) No 267/2012 (2), as last implemented by Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/230 (3).

2

3

The controller of this processing operation is the Council of the European Union represented by the Director-General of DG C (Foreign Affairs, Enlargement, Civil Protection) of the General Secretariat of the Council and the department entrusted with the processing operation is the Unit 1C of DG C that can be contacted at:

| Council of the European Union |
| --- |
| General Secretariat |
| DG C 1C |
| Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175 |
| 1048 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |
| E-mail: sanctions@consilium.europa.eu |

Council of the European Union

General Secretariat

DG C 1C

Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175

1048 Bruxelles/Brussel

BELGIQUE/BELGIË

E-mail: sanctions@consilium.europa.eu

The purpose of the processing operation is the establishment and updating of the list of persons subject to restrictive measures in accordance with Regulation EU) No 267/2012, as implemented by Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/230.

The data subjects are the natural persons who fulfil listing criteria as laid down in that Regulation.

The personal data collected includes data necessary for the correct identification of the person concerned, the Statement of Reasons and any other data related thereto.

The personal data collected may be shared as necessary with the European External Action Service and the Commission.

Without prejudice to restrictions provided for in Article 20(1)(a) and (d) of Regulation (EC) No 45/2001, requests for access, as well as requests for rectification or objection will be answered in accordance with section 5 of Council Decision 2004/644/EC (4).

4

Personal data will be retained for 5 years from the moment the data subject has been removed from the list of persons subject to the asset freeze or the validity of the measure has expired, or for the duration of court proceedings in the event they had been started.

Data subjects may have recourse to the European Data Protection Supervisor in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 45/2001.

---

(1)  OJ L 8, 12.1.2001, p. 1.

1

(2)  OJ L 88, 24.3.2012, p. 1.

2

(3)  OJ L 39, 14.2.2015, p. 3.

3

(4)  OJ L 296, 21.9.2004, p. 16.

4

---
#### Krasnoff et al., Appellants, *v.*Koopitman.

*476Argued October 10, 1934.

Before Trexler, P. J., Kíeller, Cunningham, Baldrige, Stadtfeld, Parker and James, JJ.

*Maurice G. Weinberg,*for appellant.

*William E. M. .Poole,*and with him *J. Webster Jones,*of *Jones (& Poole,*for appellee.

December 18, 1934:

Opinion by

Trexler, P. J.,

This is an action in trespass brought by Pauline Krasnoff, a minor, her father joining in his own right and as next friend, to recover damages resulting from the colliding of two automobiles. She was sitting in the rear seat of a car which was driven by a Mr. Brown, who was taking her and two other girls to school.. They proceeded west on Fairmount Avenue and were approaching Franklin Street. "When they arrived at the latter street Brown stopped the car and, quoting, his words,.“looked on both sides of the street. *477I seen a ear [the defendant’s]on the north side of Franklin Street about 100 feet away from me. I put my car in second and started to cross the street. When I crossed the Franklin Street track this here car ran into the rear part of my car and upset me to the southwest corner of Franklin Street.”

The court below entered a non suit. We think the case was for the jury. The plaintiff, (the term being applied to the minor throughout) was a guest and the attorney for the defendant correctly states that the only question is, “Was there evidence of negligence on the part of the defendant?” He argues that the defendant had the right of way as against the plaintiff’s driver approaching from defendant’s left. It appears, however that when defendant was 100 feet distant from the crossing the driver of the car in which plaintiff - was a guest was at the intersection. He, therefore, had the right of way by reason of his being at the crossing first. He crossed the street on second gear; he had proceeded so far that he was across the Franklin Street track and when the collision occurred the impact of the defendant’s car upset his car and landed it at the southwest corner of the intersecting highways. This is not a case where the approaching vehicles arrived at the intersection at practically the same time. From the testimony that was received at the trial the plaintiff could have argued, with what success would have depended upon the view the jury would take, that the defendant when 100 feet away saw or should have seen the car in which the plaintiff was riding at the crossing, and that he proceeded in spite of the situation which was presented and continued to advance against one who was already committed to the crossing and had the right of way by reason of being there first.

The judgment of the lower court is reversed with a venire.
#### MOORE CONSTRUCTION COMPANY et al., Appellants, v. FIRESTONE TIRE AND RUBBER COMPANY and Raymond C. Altermatt, Appellees.

No. 72-604.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

March 14, 1973.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
EXHIBIT 32.2

Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of The Singing Machine Company, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the period ended March 31, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Jeffrey
Barocas, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

Date: January 3, 2005               /s/ Jeffrey Barocas
                                    -----------------------------
                                    Jeffrey Barocas
                                    Chief Financial Officer
                                    (Principal Financial Officer)
Exhibit 12.2

CERTIFICATION
-------------

I, Kate Blankenship, certify that:

1.   I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of CalPetro Tankers
     (Bahamas II) Limited;

2.   Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of
     a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
     statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
     were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
     report;

3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
     information included in this report, fairly present in all material
     respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of
     the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.   The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
     establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
     in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

     a)   designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
          disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
          supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
          registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to
          us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
          which this report is being prepared;

     b)   evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
          and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
          effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end
          of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

     c)   disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
          control over financial reporting that occurred during the period
          covered by the annual report that has materially affected, or is
          reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal
          control over financial reporting; and

5.   The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on
     our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to
     the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board
     of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

     a)   all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
          operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
          reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to
          record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

     b)   any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
          employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
          control over financial reporting.

Date: June 30, 2005

/s/ Kate Blankenship
----------------------------
Kate Blankenship
Director
EXHIBIT
32.2


STATEMENT
OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER UNDER 18 U.S.C. § 1350





I,
Nicholas G. Berchtold, the Chief Financial Officer of Energy Focus, Inc. (“the
company”), certify for the purposes of section 1350 of chapter 63 of title
18 of the United States Code that, to the best of my knowledge,





(i)           the
Annual Report of the company on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31,
2008 (the “Report”), fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and





(ii)           the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the company.





/s/
      Nicholas G. BerchtoldNicholas
      G. BerchtoldMarch
      31, 2009





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Energy Focus, Inc. and will be retained by Energy Focus, Inc. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
# C_2015098EN.01000101.xml

| 25.3.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 98/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.3.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 98/1

---

Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 TFEU

Cases where the Commission raises no objections

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2015/C 98/01)

| Date of adoption of the decision | 25.11.2014 | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Aid number | SA.39854 (14/N) |
| Member State | Bulgaria |
| Region | Bulgaria | — |
| Title (and/or name of the beneficiary) | First Investment Bank — Restructuring plan |
| Legal basis | Article 152 and Article 154(1), (22) and (23) Law on Public finances;
  Decision of the Council of the Ministers dated 12.11.2014;
  Article 7 State aid Law; |
| Type of measure | Individual aid | — |
| Objective | Restructuring firms in difficulty |
| Form of aid | Other — State deposit |
| Budget | Overall budget: BGN 900 million |
| Intensity | — |
| Duration (period) | Until 28.5.2014 |
| Economic sectors | Financial service activities; except insurance and pension funding |
| Name and address of the granting authority | Ministry of finance |
| ул. Г. С. Раковски No 102 |
| 1040 София/Sofia |
| БЪЛГАРИЯ/BULGARIA |

Date of adoption of the decision

25.11.2014

Aid number

SA.39854 (14/N)

Member State

Bulgaria

Region

Bulgaria

—

Title (and/or name of the beneficiary)

First Investment Bank — Restructuring plan

Legal basis

Article 152 and Article 154(1), (22) and (23) Law on Public finances;

Decision of the Council of the Ministers dated 12.11.2014;

Article 7 State aid Law;

Type of measure

Individual aid

—

Objective

Restructuring firms in difficulty

Form of aid

Other — State deposit

Budget

Overall budget: BGN 900 million

Intensity

—

Duration (period)

Until 28.5.2014

Economic sectors

Financial service activities; except insurance and pension funding

Name and address of the granting authority

Ministry of finance

ул. Г. С. Раковски No 102

1040 София/Sofia

БЪЛГАРИЯ/BULGARIA

Other information

—

The authentic text(s) of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found at:

http://ec.europa.eu/competition/elojade/isef/index.cfm

---
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Amended Quarterly Report of Eurasia Design Inc.(the "Company") on Form 10-Q/A-1 for the period ended November 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date here of (the "report"), I, John Ferrone, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) 	The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) 	The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated this 4th day of May, 2011.



| | JOHN FERRONE                                       
| | ---------------------------------------------------
| | John Ferrone,                                      
| | Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer













A signed original of these written statements required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Eurasia Design Inc. and will be retained by Eurasia Design Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---
251 La. 679

#### Stephen K. DALEY v. Ernest N. MORIAL.

No. 48991.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Dec. 4, 1967.

In re: Stephen K. Daley applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, Parish of Orleans. 205 So.2d 213.

Writ refused. On the facts found by the Court of Appeal, it does not appear that the result reached by said Court is incorrect.
#### James D. Moore, Sr., Appellant, *vs.*Henry F. Pieper, Respondent.

*Juries*— Evidence—Witnesses.—Juries are the proper judges of the weight of ' evidence and the credibility of witnesses.

*Appeal from, St. Charles Circuit Court.*

*E. A.*Lewis, for Appellant.

*Wm. A.*Alexander, for Respondent.

Wagner, Judge,

delivered the opinion of the court.

Plaintiff sued defendant for breach of warranty in the sale of a reaping and mowing machine. The evidence was contradictory in regard to the terms of the sale, but the credit which should be properly given to the respective witnesses was exclusively for the jury to determine.

All the instructions asked for by the plaintiff were given, and the court of its own motion gave one instruction, which is the principal matter complained of. That instruction told the jury that to entitle the plaintiff to recover, it should appear to their satisfaction that according to the contract of sale, the defendant was to take back the machine and refund the amount advanced, if the machine failed in regard' to the matters understood and agreed upon by the parties at the time of the sale, and that the machine after a fair trial failed as to such matters, or, that the defendant afterwards took back the machine and abrogated the contract of sale.

This instruction though obnoxious to some verbal criticism, when applied to the evidence is not seriously objectionable.

There was evidence, tending to prove that when the' contract was made and the machine purchased, the agreement and .understanding was that it was to do good work, and if it did not operate well, the defendant was to be notified and to be allowed to put it in good order, and if it did not then work, he should take it back. The notice was given and the defendant went to plaintiffs premises to comply with his undertaking, but the plaintiff who had procured another machine *158refused to let him make the necessary repairs or test its capacity. The defendant also testified that he only received the .machine back as the property of the plaintiff, and that what he subsequently sold of it worked well. The instruction was predicated on this evidence; the jury were the proper judges of the weight of evidence and the credibility of witnesses, and we therefore §ee no reason for interference, y

Judgment affirmed.

Judge Adams concurs. Judge Bliss absent.
DISMISS: Opinion filed October 2, 2012.

In The 

## (nnrt nf \ppiah Fifth 1itrirt uf 

## ixa at Datta No. 05-1 2-00994-CV
KAREY FAY TOTTEN AND KATHY LYNN TOTTEN, Appellants V. MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION SYSTEMS, INC.,

AS NOMINEE FOR RESMAE MORTGAGE CORPORATiON, RESNIAE MORTGAGE CORPORATION, QUANTUM SERVICING CORPORATION, WATERFALL VICTORiA MASTER FUND LIMITED, AND FIRST OPTION MORTGAGE, Appellees On Appeal from the 59th Judicial District Court Grayson County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. CV-10-2002 

### MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Moseley, Fillmore, and Myers Opinion By Justice Moseley Before the Court is appellees’ motion to dismiss the appeal. Appellees contend the Court should dismiss the appeal for want ofprosecution. Appellants’ briefwas due on August 9, 2012. By letter dated August 15, 

### 2012, the Court informed appellants thattheirbriefwas past due. The Courtcautioned appellants that ifthey failed to file a briefwith an extension motion within ten days, the appeal would be dismissed. As of today’s date, appellant has not filed a brief, a motion for extension, or aresponse to appellees’motion to dismiss. AccordiniIv, we grant appellees’ motion and dismiss the appeal.SeL’ TEX. R. App. P. 38.8(a)(1) & 42.3(b) & (c).

/ JiM MOSELEY 

## 7 JUSTICE

1 20994F.P05

## QJnnrt ufAppra1i 

## .Yiftli itrirt uf Irxai at Dat1a JUDGMENT KAREY FAY TOTTEN AND KATHY LYNN TOTTEN, Appellants No. 05-12-00994-CV V. MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION SYSTEMS, INC., AS NOMINEE FOR RESMAE MORTGAGE CORPORATION, RESMAE MORTGAGE CORPORATION, QUANTUM SERVICING CORPORATION, WATERFALLVICTORIA MASTER FUND LIMITED, AND FIRST OPTION MORTGAGE, Appellees Appeal from the 59th Judicial District Court ofGrayson County. Texas. (Tr.CtJ o. CV-I0- 2002). Opinion delivered by Justice Moseley, Justices Fillmore and Myers, participating.

Based on the Court’s opinion ofthis date, the appeal is DISMISSED. Itis ORDERED that appellees, Mortgage ElectronicRegistration Systems, Inc.. as Nominee forResmac Mortgage Corporation, Resmae Mortgage Coiporation, Quantum ServicingCorporation, WaterfallVictoriaMasterFund Limited, andFirstOptionMortgage, recovertheircosts ofthe appeal from appellants, Karey Fay Totten and Kathy Lynn Totten.

4 Judgment entered October 2, 2012.

JIM MOSELEY JUSTICE
<PAGE>


                                        UNITED STATES
                             SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                                    WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

                                         FORM 6-K

                             REPORT OF FOREIGN PRIVATE ISSUER
                            PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-16 OR 15d-16
                        UNDER THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

                              FOR THE MONTH OF AUGUST, 2000


                                        CAMTEK LTD.
                     (Translation of Registrant's Name into English)


             INDUSTRIAL ZONE  o  P.O. BOX 631  o  MIGDAL HAEMEK 10556  o  ISRAEL
                            (Address of Principal Corporate Offices)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant files or will file annual
reports under cover of Form 20F or Form 40-F.   Form 20-F [X]    Form 40-F [  ]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant by furnishing the information
contained in this Form is also thereby furnishing the information to the
Commission pursuant to Rule 12g3-2(b) under the Securities and Exchange Act
of 1934.   Yes [  ]    No [X]

<PAGE>


Attached hereto as Exhibit 99.1 and incorporated by reference herein is a
press release of the registrant, dated as of August 14, 2000, announcing the
registrant's financial results for the period ended June 30, 2000.




                                       2

<PAGE>


                                     SIGNATURE

         Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.


                                               CAMTEK LTD.
                                               -----------------
                                               (Registrant)


                                               By: /s/ Yotam Stern
                                                   --------------------------
                                                   Yotam Stern,
                                                   CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER



Dated:  August 14, 2000


                                       4
<PAGE>



                                      EXHIBIT INDEX

99.1            Press release dated August 14, 2000






                                       5
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Discovery Oil, Ltd, (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Andrew V. Ippolito, President and Chairman of the Board of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/ Andrew V. Ippolito

By  __________________________________

Andrew V. Ippolito

President, Chairman of the Board

Date:  March 31, 2009