alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20460

OFFICE OF

PREVENTION, PESTICIDES

AND TOXIC SUBSTANCES

MEMORANDUM

Date/Time: February 16 , 2016 / 2 :00 p .m.

– 3 :00 p .m.

Subject: Paraquat Dichloride Meeting Minutes . OPP Meets with Technical

Registrants of Paraquat Dichloride to Discuss Specific Details of the

Paraquat Dichloride Training Materials Proposed as Mitigation.

From: Marianne A. Mannix, Chemical Review Manager

Re

- evaluation Management and Implementat ion Branch III

Pesticide Re

- evaluation Division (7508P)

Participants: Kelly Sherman (EPA), Tracy Perry (EPA), Marianne Mannix (EPA),

Nancy Fitz (EPA), Jonathan Becker (EPA), Monty Dixon (Syngenta),

John Abbott (Syngenta), K.C. Lin (Sinon), Rebecca Hargadine (Source

Dynamics), Cheryl Wagner (Sharda and Willowood), Larry Miller (Sinon

and US Raymat )

Meeting Minutes:

EPA met with the technical registrants of paraquat dichloride on February 16 , 201 6 to

discuss specific details of the training material component of the proposed mitigation

measures

. The technical registrants participated in the meeting through a conference line.

During the meeting, EPA and the registrant s discussed the scope, content, format,

distribution, and implementatio n of paraquat specific training materials.
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk's Office, Atlanta, April 02, 2018. I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written. , Clerk. 

# Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA, April 02, 2018 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order A18D0374. COBB HOSPITAL., INC. d/b/a WELLSTAR COBB HOSPITAL et al. v. GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY HEALTH et al..
Upon consideration of the Application for Discretionary Appeal, it is ordered that it be hereby GRANTED. The Appellant may file a Notice of Appeal within 10 days of the date of this order. The Clerk of Superior Court is directed to include a copy of this order in the record transmitted to the Court of Appeals.
LC NUMBERS: 1717393
# C_2013313EN.01000501.xml

| 26.10.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 313/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.10.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 313/5

---

Composition of the Grand Chamber

2013/C 313/08

On 23 September 2013, the General Court decided that, for the period from 23 September 2013 to 31 August 2016, the thirteen Judges who make up the Grand Chamber, in accordance with Article 10(1) of the Rules of Procedure, are the President of the General Court, the Vice-President, the eight Presidents of Chambers the two Judges of the formation of three Judges initially hearing the case and another Judge. The latter shall be designated, in accordance with the order set out in Article 6 of the Rules of Procedure and on an annual basis, from the two Judges who would have had to sit in the case in question if it had been assigned to a Chamber of five Judges.

---
Exhibit 11


          CONVERSION TECHNOLOGIES INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
                STATEMENT OF COMPUTATION OF NET (LOSS) PER SHARE

               For the years ended June 30, 1997 and June 30, 1996


                                              Year Ended           Year Ended
                                             June 30, 1997        June 30, 1996
                                             -------------        -------------

Net (loss) before extraordinary item....     $  (12,855,169)      $ (4,110,951)
                                             ==============       ============ 


Net (loss) as reported .................     $  (12,855,169)      $ (4,552,951)
                                             ==============       ============ 


Weighted average number of
   common shares outstanding ...........          4,773,311          1,559,908
                                             ==============       ============ 


Shares used in the computation..........          4,773,311          1,559,908
                                             ==============       ============ 


Net (loss) per common share
     before extraordinary item(1) ......     $        (2.69)       $     (2.64)
                                             ==============       ============ 


Net (loss) as reported per
     common share(1) ...................     $        (2.69)       $     (2.92)
                                             ==============       ============ 



(1)  Calculations of fully diluted and primary earnings per share are identical.
#### Lael N. BATCHELOR and Stephanie M. Clark, Appellants, v. NATIONAL BANK OF MELBOURNE AND TRUST COMPANY, as Executor of the Estate of Ralph E. Balch and as Executor of the Estate of Bess D. Balch, Appellee.

No. 1748.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Fourth District.

Jan. 18, 1968.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE BALANCE
SHEET AND THE STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2000 AND
IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0001009403
<NAME> MARCHFIRST
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                         127,557
<SECURITIES>                                    48,877
<RECEIVABLES>                                  483,678
<ALLOWANCES>                                    20,777
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               678,880
<PP&E>                                         180,113
<DEPRECIATION>                                  44,640
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               7,399,532
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          333,636
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           150
<OTHER-SE>                                   7,015,720
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 7,399,532
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               607,596
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  307,307
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               780,471
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (473,329)
<INCOME-TAX>                                    18,450
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (491,779)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (491,779)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (4.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (4.01)


</TABLE>
#### CAMBRIDGE HOTEL, INC., a Florida corporation, and Max Dritz and Helen Dritz, his wife, Appellants, v. 330 MICHIGAN AVENUE, INC., a Florida corporation, Appellee.

No. 67-102.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Third District.

Aug. 7, 1967.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed.

Appealing after remand Fla.App., 183 So. 2d 725.
Exhibit 32.1


CERTIFICATION OF
 CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND
 CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
 PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
  In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of  GSP - 2, INC., for the quarter ending September 30, 2010, I, Peter Goldstein, CEO and CFOof GSP - 2, INC. hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that:
  1. Such quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending September 30, 2010, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
  2. The information contained in such quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2010, fairly represents in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of GSP - 2, INC.
   GSP-2, INC.Date:  November 15, 2010
By:
/s/ Peter GoldsteinPeter GoldsteinPresidentPrincipal Executive and Financial Officer
Exhibit 32.1  SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION  In connection with the quarterly report of On the Move Systems Corp. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended May 31, 2016 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Robert Wilson, President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. SS. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  1.The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2.The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.  Date: July 28, 2016BY: /s/ Robert WilsonRobert WilsonPresident, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, Principal Accounting Officer, Treasurer and Director  A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 32.1





Certification of Principal Executive Officer


Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to


Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of PinstripesNY, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Clifford Teller, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:





(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/ Clifford Teller

Clifford Teller

Principal Executive Officer

November 24, 2010
EX-10.1



 Exhibit 10.1 

AMENDMENT NO. 1. TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT 

THIS AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT made and entered into as of December 5, 2016 (the “Amendment”) to that
EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT made and entered into as of December 13, 2013 (the “Agreement”) by and between FTI Consulting, Inc., a Maryland corporation with its principal offices in Annapolis, Maryland (the
“Company”), and Steven Gunby (the “Executive,” and together with the Company, the “Parties”). 

W I T N E S S E T H: 

WHEREAS, the Parties desire to amend certain terms of the Agreement; and 

NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants set forth in this Amendment and in the Agreement, the Parties mutually agree as
follows: 
 1.     Extension of Employment Term. Section 2 of the Agreement is hereby re-written as follows:

 Employment Term. The Executive’s full-time employment under this Agreement will begin as of
January 20, 2014 (the “Start Date”) and, unless otherwise terminated as provided in SECTION 10, will continue for an initial term ending at the close of business on April 1, 2017 (the “Initial Term”). The
Initial Term shall be extended, unless, otherwise terminated as provided in SECTION 10, effective April 1, 2017 for a three-year term ending on the close of business on April 1, 2020 (the “Additional Term”). Effective at
the close of business on April 1, 2020, and each annual anniversary thereof, if not otherwise terminated as provided in SECTION 10, the Additional Term and each “Renewal Term” (as hereafter defined) will automatically be extended for
an additional one-year period (each a “Renewal Term”), unless the Executive has given on hundred twenty (120) days’ prior written notice to the Company, or the Company has given ninety (90) days’ prior written
notice to the Executive, of his or its intention not to extend the Agreement for the applicable Renewal Term (a “Notice of Non-Renewal”). The Initial Term, together with the Additional Term and each Renewal Term that becomes
effective hereunder, are collectively referred to in the Agreement as the “Employment Term,” 
 2.
    Affirmation. This Amendment is to be read and construed with the Agreement as constituting one and the same agreement. Except as specifically modified by this Amendment, all remaining provisions, terms and conditions
of the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect. 







 3.     Defined Terms. All terms not herein defined shall have the
meanings ascribed to them in the Agreement. 
 4.     Counterparts. This Amendment may be executed in one or more
counterparts, each of which shall be deemed to be an original but all of which together shall constitute one and the same instrument. 

[Signature Page Follows] 

  
 -2- 








 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have signed this Amendment on the date first above written. 

 

									
	 	 	 	 	 	 	FTI CONSULTING, INC.
					
	 Date:
	 	 12/5/16
	 		 	 By:
	 	/S/ CURTIS LU
		 	  
	 		 		 	  

		 		 		 	 Name:
	 	Curtis Lu
		 		 		 	 Title:
	 	General Counsel
					
		 		 		 		 	EXECUTIVE
					
	 Date:
	 	 12/5/16
	 		 	 By:
	 	/S/ STEVEN H. GUNBY
		 	  
	 		 		 	  

		 		 		 		 	Steven H. Gunby


  
 -3-
Amendment to Investment Advisory Agreement



 Exhibit 10.6 

FIRST AMENDMENT TO 

INVESTMENT ADVISORY AGREEMENT 

THIS FIRST AMENDMENT TO INVESTMENT ADVISORY AGREEMENT (this “Amendment”) is made and entered into effective as of
March 1, 2016, by and between Hennessy Funds Trust, a Delaware statutory trust (the “Trust”), on behalf of each of its investment series set forth on Schedule A hereto as it may be amended from time to time (hereinafter
referred to each as a “Fund” and together as the “Funds”), and Hennessy Advisors, Inc., a California corporation (“HNNA”). 

RECITALS 
 WHEREAS,
the Trust is registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended, as an open-end management investment company; 

WHEREAS, the Trust and HNNA previously entered into an Investment Advisory Agreement, dated as of February 28, 2014, pursuant to
which the Trust retained HNNA as the investment adviser to the Funds (the “Advisory Agreement”); 
 WHEREAS, HNNA
agreed to reduce the annual investment advisory fee for the Hennessy Japan Fund from 1.00% to 0.80% effective as of March 1, 2016, and to reduce the annual investment advisory fee for the Hennessy Japan Small Cap Fund from 1.20% to 0.80%
effective as of March 1, 2016; and 
 WHEREAS, the parties now desire to amend the Advisory Agreement to replace
Schedule A with an updated schedule to reflect the reduction in the annual investment advisory fee for the Hennessy Japan Fund and the Hennessy Japan Small Cap Fund. 

AGREEMENT 
 NOW,
THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and covenants hereinafter contained, the Trust on behalf of the Funds and HNNA do mutually promise and agree as follows: 

1.    Schedule A to the Advisory Agreement is hereby replaced in its entirety with Schedule A to this
Amendment. 
 2.    Except as herein modified or amended, the terms and conditions of the Advisory Agreement shall
remain unchanged and in full force and effect. 
 (Signature page follows.) 

  
 1 








 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Amendment to be executed on the
day first above written. 
  

			
	HENNESSY ADVISORS, INC.
		
	By:	 	 /s/ Neil J. Hennessy

		 	Neil J. Hennessy
		 	President and Chief Executive Officer
	
	HENNESSY FUNDS TRUST
		
	By:	 	 /s/ Neil J. Hennessy

		 	Neil J. Hennessy
		 	President


 Signature Page to First Amendment to Investment Advisory Agreement 







 SCHEDULE A 

(as of March 1, 2016) 
  

						
	 Name of Fund
	  	Advisory Fee per Annum
(as a % of average daily net assets)
	 Hennessy Cornerstone Growth Fund
	  	 	 	0.74	%
	 Hennessy Cornerstone Mid Cap 30 Fund
	  	 	 	0.74	%
	 Hennessy Cornerstone Value Fund
	  	 	 	0.74	%
	 Hennessy Total Return Fund
	  	 	 	0.60	%
	 Hennessy Balanced Fund
	  	 	 	0.60	%
	 Hennessy Japan Fund
	  	 	 	0.80	%
	 Hennessy Japan Small Cap Fund
	  	 	 	0.80	%

 Schedule A
EXHIBIT 32.2

Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of The Singing Machine Company, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the period ended March 31, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Jeffrey
Barocas, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

Date: January 17, 2005                 /s/ Jeffrey Barocas
                                       -----------------------------
                                       Jeffrey Barocas
                                       Chief Financial Officer
                                       (Principal Financial Officer)
#### SPRA-CRETE STRUCTURAL SYSTEMS, INC., Appellant, v. Paulette N. LEE and Bonita V. Randolph, Appellees.

No. 72-1253.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Nov. 30, 1972.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed.
EXHIBIT 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. {section} 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of China Highlands Limited (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Jeremy Mork, Chief Executive and Financial  Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. {section} 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes- Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



|Dated:  May 13, 2011
By  /s/ Jeremy Mork
-----------------------------
    Jeremy Mork
    Chief Executive and  Financial Officer
   (Principal Executive and Financial Officer)
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
From: Frey, Nathan J. <Nathan_J._Frey@omb.eop.gov>

Sent: Saturday, July 18, 2015 2:52 PM

To: Culligan, Kevin; Harvey, Reid; Vasu, Amy

Cc: Szabo, Aaron; Grossman, Andrea

Subject: RE: Summary of Interagency Comments Under EO12866 and 13563 -- Evaluation

Measurement and Verification (EM&V) Guidance for CPP

Attached please find an additional summary of interagency comments under EO 12866 and 13563

on the draft EPA Evaluation Measurement and Verification (EM&V) Guidance for Demand-Side

Energy Efficiency (EE).

Thank you and please let me know if you have any questions.

Nathan

<< SummaryofinteragencycommentsunderEO12866_13563_EO 12866_EM&V

Guidance7182015.docx >>

## Summary	of	Interagency	Working	Com ments	on	Draft	Language	under

EO12866/13563	Interagency	Review.		Subject	to	Further	Policy	Re view.

1. Reviewers recognizes that comments pertaining to the “guidance” document may be addressed

in a separate document which describes the “regulatory requirements.” Are the regulatory

requirements included in the preamble or a separate TSD?

2. Reviewer recommend that the guidance should clearly delineate the methods and protocols

that are pre

‐ approved or likely to be approved versus those that may be approved subject to

further EPA review.

a. Instead of providing a list of resources, reviewer recommend providing more specific

direction about what EM&V is required to generate efficiency ERCs.

b. Reviewer suggest using the terms: “likely to be approved” and “may be approved

pending review”

– This structure would give entities some level of regulatory certainty,

while still allowing maximum flexibility. Reviewers believe entities will choose more

regulatory certain methods, which will likely reduce the administrative burden to EPA.

c. Reviewers recommend that protocols from the Uniform Methods Project are listed

under the “likely to be approved” category.

3. Reviewers recommend adding a discussion of CHP and a discussion of T&D savings.

4. Reviewers recommend that this guidance should explicitly be linked to the federal plan,

indicating that energy efficiency ERCs and allowances could be used under the federal plan if

they are created in accordance with the guidance.

5. Reviewer recommend including (or referencing the location in the preamble or the TSD) the

steps required to generate efficiency ERCs. It would also be useful to include examples of roles

and responsibilities.

6. Reviewers recommend issuing a standard savings reporting form that includes a description of

evaluation methods. The Northeast Energy Efficiency Partnership standard reporting form could

serve as an example. Reviewers offer to provide technical assistance in this effort.
Exhibit 32.1   CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Quarterly Report of WTTJ Corp., (the Company) on Form 10Q for the three month period ended March 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Peter Klamka, President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that;  1.   The Report fully complies with the requirement of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and  2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.   /s/ Name:  Peter Klamka Title:    President  Date:    May 16, 2011
#### Henry ARNOLD and John F. Robbert v. The BOARD OF LEVEE COMMISSIONERS OF the ORLEANS LEVEE DISTRICT, Guy Le Mieux, the F. Edward Hebert Foundation and Ernest A. Carrere, Jr.

No. 62385.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

June 30, 1978.

In re: The F. Edward Hebert Foundation, applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit. Parish of New Orleans. 359 So.2d 748.

Granted.

It is ordered that the writ of review issue; that the Court of Appeal send up the record in duplicate of the case; and that counsel for plaintiff and defendant be notified.
#### Lloyd W. WESTGATE, Petitioner, v. FARM STORES, INC. and the Industrial Relations Commission, Respondents.

No. 43536.

Supreme Court of Florida.

May 22, 1973.

Certiorari denied.

ROBERTS, Acting- C. J., and ERVIN, ADKINS, BOYD and McCAIN, JJ., concur.