alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 3003

To amend title 38 of the United States Code to permit certain eligible

veterans to purchase up to $20,000 of National Service Life Insurance.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

AUGUST 6, 1993

Mr. SLATTERY (by request) introduced the following bill; which was referred

to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs

A BILL

To amend title 38 of the United States Code to permit

certain eligible veterans to purchase up to $20,000 of

National Service Life Insurance.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. NATIONAL SERVICE LIFE INSURANCE.

4 (a) ADDITIONAL INSURANCE.—(1) Subchapter I of

5 chapter 19 of title 38, United States Code, is amended

6 by adding at the end the following new section:

7 ‘‘§ 1930. Additional insurance

8 ‘‘(a) Any person insured under any policy of National

9 Service Life Insurance shall upon application in writing,

10 submission of evidence of good health satisfactory to the
2

•HR 3003 IH

1 Secretary at the time of such application, and payment

2 of the required premiums be granted additional National

3 Service Life Insurance in an amount equal to the amount

4 of National Service Life Insurance that person has in force

5 on the date the person’s application for the additional in6 surance is received by the Department of Veterans Affairs.

7 ‘‘(b) Additional National Service Life Insurance is8 sued under subsection (a) of this section shall be issued

9 upon the same terms and conditions as contained in the

10 veteran’s National Service Life Insurance policy or policies

11 in force on the date of application, except that the pre12 mium rates for the additional insurance shall be estab13 lished by the Secretary to cover fully the Government’s

14 cost in providing such additional insurance.’’.

15 (2) The table of sections at the beginning of chapter

16 19 of such title is amended by inserting after the item

17 relating to section 1929 the following new item:

‘‘1930. Additional insurance.’’.

18 (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENTS.—

19 (1) Section 1903 of such title is amended by in20 serting before the period at the end of the last sen21 tence the following: ‘‘, nor to the purchase of addi22 tional insurance authorized under section 1930 of

23 this title’’.

24 (2) Section 1941 of such title is amended by in25 serting before the period at the end of the last sen-
3

•HR 3003 IH

1 tence the following: ‘‘, nor to the purchase of addi2 tional insurance authorized under section 1930 of

3 this title’’.

4 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by

5 this section shall take effect as of the first day of the first

6 month beginning more than six months after the date of

7 the enactment of this Act.

Æ
#### Herbert F. MATHIS, Appellant, v. JENKINS TRUCKING, INC., a Florida corporation, and James Allen Hamilton, Appellees.

No. 66-952.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Third District.

Oct. 31, 1967.

Rehearing Denied Nov. 29, 1967.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 3389

To amend the Federal Deposit Insurance Act to require insured depository

institutions to provide notify customers who purchase mutual funds on

the premise of the institution that such mutual funds are not insured

deposits, and for other purposes.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

OCTOBER 27, 1993

Mr. NEAL of Massachusetts introduced the following bill; which was referred

to the Committee on Banking, Finance and Urban Affairs

A BILL

To amend the Federal Deposit Insurance Act to require

insured depository institutions to provide notify customers who purchase mutual funds on the premise of

the institution that such mutual funds are not insured

deposits, and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Depository Institution

5 Mutual Fund Sales Act’’.
2

•HR 3389 IH

1 SEC. 2. DEPOSITORY INSTITUTION MUTUAL FUND SALE

2 DISCLOSURE REQUIREMENTS.

3 Section 18 of the Federal Deposit Insurance Act (12

4 U.S.C. 1828) is amended by adding at the end the follow5 ing new subsection:

6 ‘‘(q) DEPOSITORY INSTITUTION MUTUAL FUND

7 SALES.—

8 ‘‘(1) DISCLOSURE REQUIRED.—An insured de9 pository institution shall require any person who

10 sells or offers for sale, at any office of the institu11 tion, any shares issued by a registered investment

12 company to disclose, in writing, to any person who

13 purchases, seeks to purchase, or seeks an opinion or

14 investment advice about, any such shares that such

15 shares are not deposits and are not insured by the

16 Corporation or the Federal Government.

17 ‘‘(2) ADVERTISING AND PROMOTIONAL MATE18 RIAL.—An insured depository institution shall—

19 ‘‘(A) include in any advertisement, solicita20 tion, or promotional or sales material issued by

21 the institution which relates to any shares is22 sued by a registered investment company which

23 are sold, or offered for sale, at any office of the

24 institution (including any solicitation contained

25 in any periodic statement issued by the institu26 tion), and any sale confirmation notice issued in
3

•HR 3389 IH

1 connection with any such shares, the disclosures

2 required under paragraph (1); and

3 ‘‘(B) require any person who sells or offers

4 to sell any such shares at any office of the insti5 tution to comply with the requirements of sub6 paragraph (A) with respect to any advertise7 ment, solicitation, or promotional or sales mate8 rial issued by such person in connection with

9 such sales.’’.

Æ
#### Charles Edward CLARK v. BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS OF the PORT OF NEW ORLEANS.

No. 4858.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Fourth Circuit.

Feb. 23, 1972.

Rehearing Denied March 7, 1972.

Writ Granted April 6, 1972.

*413Charles R. Maloney, New Orleans, for plaintiff-appellant.

Phelps, Dunbar, Marks, Claverie & Sims, Sumter D. Marks, Jr., Charles M. Lanier, New Orleans, for defendant-appellee.

Before CHASEZ, STOULIG and BAILES, JJ.

STOULIG, Judge.

This is an appeal from a judgment sustaining an exception of sovereign immunity of the Board of Commissioners for the Port of New Orleans which resulted in a dismissal of plaintiff’s tort action.

The factual allegations set forth in the petition aver that the plaintiff, Charles Edward Clark, while in the employ of the Strachan Shipping Company, Inc., and while engaged in operating a forklift, fell in a hole in the dock area of the Seventh Street Wharf, sustaining multiple bodily injuries. The hole was allegedly due to rotted timbers in the wharf which the defendant operated and maintained on the levee, the batture, and over the navigable waters of the Mississippi River.

Apparently no legislative waiver of immunity from suit and liability was obtained, for none was tendered into evidence. The maintaining of defendant’s exception and the dismissing of plaintiff’s suit by the trial court have resulted in the filing of this appeal.

The sole issue presented for our determination is whether the Board of Commissioners of the Port of New Orleans is immune from liability in tort under the sovereign immunity of the state and therefore not amenable to suit.

This precise question has recently been considered by this Circuit in the cases of Moore v. Board of Com’rs of Port of New Orleans, 256 So.2d 138 (1971); and Board of Com’rs v. Splendour Shipping & Ent. Co., 255 So.2d 869 (1971). The court reached the conclusion in both cases that the settled jurisprudence of the Supreme Court of Louisiana, by which it is bound, holds that the Board of Commissioners of the Port of New Orleans is an agency of the State of Louisiana and, as such, is immune from suit in tort.1

We are in accord with the conclusion reached in the Moore and Splendour cases and are of the opinion that no point would be served by a further elaboration of the matter. Suffice it to state that absent legislative waiver of immunity from suit in tort, the plaintiff may not pursue his action against the Board of Commissioners of the Port of New Orleans.

For these reasons the judgment appealed from is affirmed. Costs of this appeal are to be borne by appellant.

Affirmed.

1

. Fouchaux v. Board of Com’rs of Port of New Orleans, 219 La. 354, 53 So.2d 128 (1951); Miller, Royal Indemnity Co. v. Board of Com’rs, 199 La. 1071, 7 So.2d 355 (1942); Lamport & Holt, Ltd. v. Board of Com’rs of Port of New Orleans, 137 La. 784, 69 So. 174 (1915). See also Board of Com’rs of Port of New Orleans v. Gypsum Transportation, Ltd., 209 So.2d 296 (La.App. 4th Cir. 1968) (writs refused by Louisiana Supreme Court, 252 La. 260, 210 So.2d 505 (1968) and by the Supreme Court of the United States, 393 U.S. 938, 89 S.Ct. 302, 21 L.Ed.2d 275 (1968)).
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                           5,053
<SECURITIES>                                     1,214
<RECEIVABLES>                                    3,466
<ALLOWANCES>                                       383
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 9,613
<PP&E>                                           5,588
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  17,138
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            8,241
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           120
<OTHER-SE>                                       6,178
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    17,138
<SALES>                                          1,844
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 1,844
<CGS>                                              358
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    1,690
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    34
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 123
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    120
<INCOME-TAX>                                        25
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                        95
<EPS-BASIC>                                       .008
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     .008


</TABLE>
#### Arthur W. POOLE, Appellant, v. Virginia M. POOLE, Appellee.

Nos. 762, 763.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Fourth District.

Oct. 5, 1967.

Rehearing Denied Nov. 6, 1967.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
##### 



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO  18 U. S. C. SECTION 1350  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 Date: March 17, 2008
    
    /s/ DAVID E. MEADORDavid E. MeadorExecutive Vice President and Chief FinancialOfficer of The Detroit Edison Company
U.S. flag
              An official website of the United States government Skip to main content   end of header Census.gov Newsroom Releases Miscellaneous
 Newsroom Archive
 Skip left menu navigation
 About the Newsroom
 				Facts for Features
 				**News Releases**
 				Press Kits
 				Tip Sheets
 Release Information CB11-189 **Contact:**  Public Information Office
301-763-3030/763-3762 (fax)
 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:  TUESDAY, NOV. 8, 2011 Media Advisory — Census Bureau Webinar to Highlight Migration Data What:
 The U.S. Census Bureau will hold an audio news conference to release four migration-related data products. Statistics from the Current Population Survey and American Community Survey examine topics including the likelihood of people moving and how this rate has changed over time, the reasons people move, how common it is for people to live in their state of birth, and the most common sets of state-to-state moves. The news conference will consist of a simultaneous audio conference and online presentation. Information on accessing the online presentation is provided below. Reporters will be able to ask questions once the presentation is complete. We suggest reporters log in and call in early.
 When:
 Tuesday, Nov. 15, 2011; 10 a.m. (EST)
 Who:
 Alison Fields, chief, Journey-to-Work & Migration Statistics Branch, U.S. Census Bureau
William H. Frey, senior fellow, Metropolitan Policy Program, Brookings Institution
 Details:
 **Audio conference ― access information**
Toll free number:  888-989-7686
Passcode: CENSUS
Note: Stay on the line until operator asks for the passcode. Do not key in passcode. **Online presentation ― access information
Please login early, as some setup is required.**
URL: https://www.mymeetings.com/nc/join/
Conference/meeting number: PW8836688
Conference/meeting passcode: CENSUS If closed captioning required: http://livewrite.nccsite.com/view/cb1115
  **Follow @uscensusbureau on Twitter, Facebook, Flickr, YouTube**
  CONNECT WITH US

Information Quality
                    Data Linkage Infrastructure
                    Data Protection and Privacy Policy
                    Accessibility      
                    FOIA
                    Inspector General
                    No FEAR Act
                    U.S. Department of Commerce
                    USA.gov
                   Measuring America's People, Places, and Economy
#### Thomas Andrew GENTZEL, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

No. 72-1057.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Feb. 19, 1973.

Certiorari dismissed.
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO 
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection
with the Annual Report of Daxor Corporation on Form 10-K for the period ended
December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the Report), I, David Frankel, Chief Financial Officer of Daxor
Corporation, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:

(1) The Report
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of Daxor Corporation

| |                         | 
| | ----------------------- | 
| | /s/ David Frankel       | 
| |                         | 
| | David Frankel           | 
| | Chief Financial Officer | 
| |                         | 
| | Date: March 19, 2009    | 

---
# C_2013163EN.01000601.xml

| 8.6.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 163/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.6.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 163/6

---

Special Report No 2/2013 ‘Has the Commission ensured efficient implementation of the Seventh Framework Programme for Research?’

2013/C 163/05

The European Court of Auditors hereby informs you that Special Report No 2/2013 ‘Has the Commission ensured efficient implementation of the Seventh Framework Programme for Research?’ has just been published.

The report can be accessed for consultation or downloading on the European Court of Auditors' website: http://eca.europa.eu

A hard copy version of the report may be obtained free of charge on request to the Court of Auditors:

| European Court of Auditors |
| --- |
| Unit ‘Audit: Production of Reports’ |
| 12, rue Alcide de Gasperi |
| 1615 Luxembourg |
| LUXEMBOURG |
| Tel. +352 4398-1 |
| E-mail: eca-info@eca.europa.eu |

European Court of Auditors

Unit ‘Audit: Production of Reports’

12, rue Alcide de Gasperi

1615 Luxembourg

LUXEMBOURG

Tel. +352 4398-1

E-mail: eca-info@eca.europa.eu

or by filling in an electronic order form on EU-Bookshop.

---
#### Karleen York PARKS in her own behalf and as Tutrix of Danny L. Gill v. Vincent PAOLA and XYZ Insurance Co.

No. 60679.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Oct. 26, 1977.

In re: Karleen York Parks, in her own behalf and as tutrix of Danny L. Gill applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, Parish of East Baton Rouge, 349 So.2d 896.

Denied.

TATE and DIXON, JJ.,

are of the opinion a writ should be granted.
**Exhibit 32(a)**

 

**DPL Inc.**

** **

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

The undersigned officerof DPL Inc. (the “Issuer”) hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, thatthe Issuer’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31,2008, which this certificate accompanies, fully complies with the requirementsof Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934and that the information contained therein fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Issuer as ofthe dates and for the periods expressed therein.

 

A signed original of thiswritten statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adoptingthe signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of thisstatement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, hasbeen provided to the Issuer and will be retained by the Issuer and furnished tothe Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

Signed:

 

 
| /s/ Paul M. Barbas                     |   |
|----------------------------------------|--------|
| Paul M. Barbas                         |
| President and Chief  Executive Officer |

 

Date: February 26,2009

 

The foregoing certificateis being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and is notbeing filed as part of the Issuer’s Annual Report or as a separate disclosuredocument.

 

----
# Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

August 3, 2018

No. 04

- 18

- 00237

- CR

Flanzo Lafonte TOWNES

, Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas, Appellee

From the 226th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 20 09CR0764 Honorable Sid L. Harle, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

On July 27, 2018, appellant filed a pro se Motion to Compel asking us to “compel and

enforce” our order dated July 5, 2018 in which we ordered the trial court clerk to supplement the appellate record. On July 25, 2018, the trial court clerk supplemented the appellate record, and the clerk of this court forwarded a copy of the supplemental clerk’s record to appell ant. Accordingly, appellant’s Motion to Compel is DENIED AS MOOT

.

Also on July 27, 2018, appellant filed a pro se Motion for Temporary Order and Injunction requesting additional access to the Bexar County Jail Law Library. Appellant’s

Mo tion for Temporary Order and Injunction is DENIED

.

_________________________________ Irene Rios , Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereu nto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 3rd day of August, 2018

.___________________________________ K eith E. H ottle

Clerk of Court
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3326 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3326

 To delay the effective date of regulations issued by the Secretary of 
Housing and Urban Development governing the admission of single persons 
           into public and assisted housing for the elderly.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 20, 1993

 Mr. Klink (for himself and Mr. Coyne) introduced the following bill; 
   which was referred to the Committee on Banking, Finance and Urban 
                                Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To delay the effective date of regulations issued by the Secretary of 
Housing and Urban Development governing the admission of single persons 
           into public and assisted housing for the elderly.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. LIMITED MORATORIUM.

    (a) Delayed Effective Date.--Notwithstanding any other provision of 
law, effective on the date of enactment of this Act, parts 812, 905, 
912, and 960 of title 24, Code of Federal Regulations, as amended to 
implement section 573(a) of the National Affordable Housing Act of 
1990, shall not apply to public and assisted housing developed as an 
elderly housing project with the approval of the Department of Housing 
and Urban Development (hereafter in this section referred to as the 
``Department'') before the date on which the Secretary of Housing and 
Urban Development (hereafter in this section referred to as the 
``Secretary'') issues final regulations implementing section 621 of the 
Housing and Community Development Act of 1992.
    (b) Applicable Regulations.--During the period beginning on the 
date of enactment of this Act and ending on the date on which the 
Secretary issues final regulations implementing section 621 of the 
Housing and Community Development Act of 1992, parts 812, 905, 912, and 
960 of title 24, Code of Federal Regulations, as such parts existed 
prior to the effective date of the regulations issued to implement 
section 573(a) of the National Affordable Housing Act of 1990, shall 
apply to public and assisted housing developed as an elderly project 
with the approval of the Department.

                                 <all>
```