alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2012314EN.01000101.xml

| 18.10.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 314/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.10.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 314/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.6641 — Verbund/Siemens/E-Mobility Provider Austria)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2012/C 314/01

On 20 September 2012, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in German and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32012M6641. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32012M6641. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                       2,244,265
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               15,246,309
<ALLOWANCES>                                 (313,800)
<INVENTORY>                                 29,995,215
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            50,501,082
<PP&E>                                      25,247,291
<DEPRECIATION>                              13,999,120
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              68,275,851
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       19,433,682
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     9,241,941
<OTHER-SE>                                   8,589,326
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                68,275,851
<SALES>                                    101,251,380
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           101,457,429
<CGS>                                       64,916,410
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               94,442,525
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            29,526,115
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,764,620
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              5,250,284
<INCOME-TAX>                                 1,525,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 3,725,284
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .76
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .76
        

</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-7330

CHARLES R. LABOONE,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

RONALD J. ANGELONE, Director, Virginia

Department of Corrections,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Henry Coke Morgan, Jr., Senior

District Judge. (CA-96-746-2)

Submitted: November 17, 2005 Decided: November 29, 2005

Before WILKINSON, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Charles R. LaBoone, Appellant Pro Se. Linwood Theodore Wells, Jr.,

Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Charles R. LaBoone seeks to appeal the district court’s

order denying relief on his motion filed under Fed. R. Civ. P.

60(b). The district court found that LaBoone’s motion actually

sought relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000), and dismissed the

action because he failed to first obtain authorization from this

court to file a successive § 2254 petition. See 28 U.S.C.

§ 2244(b) (2000). The order is not appealable unless a circuit

justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C.

§ 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue

absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional

right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this

standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that

the district court’s assessment of his constitutional claims is

debatable and that any dispositive procedural rulings by the

district court are also debatable or wrong. See Miller-El v.

Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S.

473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee, 252 F.3d 676, 683 (4th Cir. 2001).

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that LaBoone

has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a

certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process. 

DISMISSED
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

May 30, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice

132660 Michael F. Cavanagh
Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan Robert P. Young, Jr. RODNEY HOOVER, Individually, and as Stephen J. Markman, Conservator of the Estate of Michael Justices Hoover, a minor, and MAXINE HOOVER, Plaintiffs-Appellees,

v SC: 132660 COA: 269206 Genesee CC: 86-085769-NZ MICHIGAN MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, a/k/a AMERISURE, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application fo r leave to appeal the September 14, 2006 order of the Court of Appeals is considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.302(G)(1), in lieu of granting leave to appeal, we REMAND th is case to the Court of Appeals for consideration as on leave granted.

p0523 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

May 30, 2007

Clerk
#### JACKSON-HINDS BANK v. MID-SOUTH POOLS, LTD., et al.

No. 44282.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

March 6, 1967.

Suggestion of Error Overruled March 27, 1967.

Henley, Jones & Henley, Jackson, for appellant.

Ray, Lee, Moore & Swarthout, Jackson, Sullivan, Dunbar & Smith, Brewer, Brewer & Luckett, James E. Upshaw, Holcomb, Curtis & Connell, T. H. Pearson, Elzy J. Smith, Jr., Tom J. Ross, Wm. R. Bradley, V. J. Brocato, S. H. Robertson, Wm. H. Maynard, Clarksdale, Fred Witty, Greenwood, for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 21-0191

STATE OF MONTANA, 

Plaintiff and Appellee, 

v. 

CHRISTOPHER PARIS STOCKDALE,

Defendant and Appellant. 

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and 

good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including December 6, 2021, within which to prepare, 

file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

November 1 2021

11/01/2021

Case Number: DA 21-0191
**Exhibit
      32.1**




**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 ***




In
      connection with the Annual Report of WindsorTech, Inc. (the "Company") on Form
      10-KSB/A for the year ended December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities
      and
      Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Marc Sherman, Chairman
      of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
      to 18
      U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002, that:




(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Act of 1934; and




(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.




Date:
                November 14, 2005
            
            /s/Marc
                ShermanMarc
                Sherman
              Chairman
                of the Board and
              Chief
                Executive Officer




*  A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002 has been provided to WindsorTech, Inc. and will be retained by
      WindsorTech, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
      its
      staff upon request.








**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 ***




In
      connection with the Annual Report of WindsorTech, Inc. (the "Company") on Form
      10-KSB/A for the year ended December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities
      and
      Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Edward L. Cummings,
      Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
      1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
      that:




(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Act of 1934; and




(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.




Date:
                November 14, 2005
            
            /s/Edward
                L. CummingsEdward
                L. Cummings
              Chief
                Financial Officer


*  A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002 has been provided to WindsorTech, Inc. and will be retained by
      WindsorTech, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
      its
      staff upon request.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-4042
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus FLOYD ROBERT WILLIAMS, a/k/a Robbie Swain, Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at Beckley. Elizabeth V. Hallanan, District Judge. (CR-95-73) Submitted: November 21, 1996 Decided: December 4, 1996 Before HALL, WILKINS, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. G. Ernest Skaggs, SKAGGS & SKAGGS, Fayetteville, West Virginia, for Appellant. Rebecca A. Betts, United States Attorney, John C. Parr, Assistant United States Attorney, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM:Floyd Robert Williams pled guilty to distributing crack cocaine, 21 U.S.C.A. § 841 (West 1981 & Supp. 1996). He was sentenced to a term of 83 months imprisonment and three years supervised release. A $2000 fine was imposed. Williams' attorney has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), raising one issue but stating that, in his view, there are no meritorious grounds for appeal. Williams was notified of his right to file a pro se supplemental brief, but has not filed a brief. In the Anders brief, Williams' counsel suggests that the district court may have sentenced Williams above the low end of the guideline range of 78-97 months because of his race; Williams is black. However, there is nothing in the record to support that contention. We cannot find that race was a factor in the court's determination of the sentence. In accordance with Anders , we have examined the entire record in this case and find no meritorious issues for appeal. This court requires that counsel inform his client, in writing, of his right to petition the Supreme Court of the United States for further review. We therefore deny defense counsel's motion to withdraw at this time. If the client requests that a petition be filed, but counsel believes that such a petition would be frivolous, then counsel may again move in this court for leave to withdraw from representation. Counsel's motion must state that a copy thereof was served on the client.3 We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the record and briefs, and oral argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
EXHIBIT 32.1


CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned certifies that to the best of his knowledge (1) this Quarterly Report of Corporate Capital Trust, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2018, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (this "Report"), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and (2) the information contained in this Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition of the Company as of March 31, 2018 and December 31, 2017 and its results of operations for the period ended March 31, 2018.


Date: May 14, 2018/s/ Todd C. BuilioneTodd C. BuilionePresident(Principal Executive Officer)Date: May 14, 2018/s/ Thomas MurphyThomas MurphyChief Financial Officer(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
#### John H. LARSEN, Petitioner, v. CENTEX HOMES CORP., Respondent.

No. 44722.

Supreme Court of Florida.

March 21, 1974.

Certiorari denied.

ADKINS, C. J., and ROBERTS, Mc-CAIN and DEKLE, JJ., concur.

ERVIN and BOYD, JJ., dissent.
#### JUICE SPECIALISTS, INC. v. CONNER.

No. 36930.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Feb. 1968.

Certiorari denied without opinion. 203 So.2d 218.
#### Tommy G. STEWART et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. NATIONAL INDEMNITY COMPANY et al., Defendants-Appellees.

No. 3855.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Third Circuit.

June 19, 1972.

Rehearing Denied July 12, 1972.

Writ Refused Sept. 27, 1972.

*254Makar & Whitaker, by John Makar, Natchitoches, for plaintiffs-appellants.

Gahagan & Kelly, Russell E. Gahagan, Natchitoches, for defendants-appellees.

Before FRUGÉ, SAVOY, and DO-MENGEAUX, JJ.

FRUGÉ, Judge.

This suit arose from a collision of an overtaking and passing truck with a left-turning motorist. Both vehicles were proceeding south on Louisiana Highway 1 just south of the City of Natchitoches. The trial court concluded that plaintiff, the left-turning motorist, was negligent. Plaintiffs have appealed. After thoroughly reviewing the evidence, we have concluded that there is no manifest error. We affirm.

For the foregoing reasons, the judgment appealed from is affirmed. The appellants to pay all costs.

Affirmed.
#### In re Ulyss Eugene WEATHINGTON v. CITY OF BIRMINGHAM. Ex parte Ulyss Eugene Weathington.

SC 658.

Supreme Court of Alabama.

Jan. 31, 1974.

William Conway, Birmingham, for petitioner.

No brief for respondent.

COLEMAN, Justice.

Petition of Ulyss Eugene Weathington for Certiorari to the Court of Criminal Appeals to review and revise the judgment and decision of that Court in Weathington v. City of Birmingham, 52 Ala.App. 77, 289 So.2d 645.

Writ, denied.

HEFLIN, C. J., and BLOODWORTH, McCALL and JONES, JJ., concur.
# C_2014447EN.01003002.xml

| 13.12.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 447/30 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.12.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 447/30

---

Information communicated by Member States regarding closure of fisheries

(2014/C 447/13)

In accordance with Article 35(3) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1224/2009 of 20 November 2009 establishing a Community control system for ensuring compliance with the rules of the common fisheries policy (1), a decision has been taken to close the fishery as set down in the following table:

1

| Date and time of closure | 21.11.2014 |
| --- | --- |
| Duration | 21.11.2014-31.12.2014 |
| Member State | Portugal |
| Stock or Group of stocks | GHL/N3LMNO |
| Species | Greenland Halibut (Reinhardtius hippoglossoides) |
| Zone | NAFO 3 LMNO |
| Type(s) of fishing vessels | — |
| Reference number | 77/TQ43 |

Date and time of closure

21.11.2014

Duration

21.11.2014-31.12.2014

Member State

Portugal

Stock or Group of stocks

GHL/N3LMNO

Species

Greenland Halibut (Reinhardtius hippoglossoides)

Reinhardtius hippoglossoides

Zone

NAFO 3 LMNO

Type(s) of fishing vessels

—

Reference number

77/TQ43

---

(1)  OJ L 343, 22.12.2009, p. 1.

1

---
250 La. 542

#### W. P. LOFTON et al. v. E. G. POSEY et al.

No. 48652.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 14, 1967.

In re: E. G. Posey and the Board of Tax Appeals of the State of Louisiana applying for certiorari or writ of review to the Court of Appeal, Second Circuit, Parish of Franklin. 195 So.2d 764.

Writ refused.

The judgment is correct.
Exhibit 32.02





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of REO Plus, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2012 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on or about the date hereof ("Report"), the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:





1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated: December 21, 2012


/s/Richard J. Church


Richard J. Church, Treasurer


(Principal Financial Officer)
# C_2014043EN.01000101.xml

| 14.2.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 43/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.2.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 43/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.7142 — Mitsubishi Corporation/Mitsubishi Electric Corporation/International Elevator & Equipment)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2014/C 43/01

On 4 February 2014, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32014M7142. EUR-Lex is the online access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32014M7142. EUR-Lex is the online access to the European law.

---
Exhibit 21.1


Del Laboratories, Inc.

Domestic
Del Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (Delaware)
565 Broad Hollow Realty Corp. (New York)
Parfums Schiaparelli, Inc. (New York)
Royce & Rader, Inc. (Delaware)
Del Professional Products, Inc. (Delaware)

Foreign
Del Laboratorios (Canada) Inc. (Canada)
Del Pharmaceutics (Canada) Inc. (Canada)
Del Pharmaceuticals Ltd. (U.K.)
Del Laboratorios U.K. Limited (U.K.)
Pade Mexicana, S.A. de C.V. (Mexico) (50% owned by Del)
Laboratorios del De Mexico, S.A. de C.V.
DLI (Proprietary) Ltd. (South Africa) (50% owned by Del)


All subsidiaries are 100% owned by Del unless otherwise indicated.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                      72,401,119
<SECURITIES>                                75,838,649
<RECEIVABLES>                               19,581,783
<ALLOWANCES>                                   479,705
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             4,745,107
<PP&E>                                      27,947,712
<DEPRECIATION>                               3,295,623
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             520,197,801
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       22,903,503
<BONDS>                                      3,150,181
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       375,770
<OTHER-SE>                                 493,768,347
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               520,197,801
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            30,182,303
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               17,299,594
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            81,792,930
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                         (4,250,841)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           (64,659,380)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       (64,659,380)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                              (64,659,380)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (1.78)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.78)


</TABLE>