# EUR-Lex - 52015PC0072 - EN

*|*

# 52015PC0072

**Proposal for a COUNCIL DECISION on the signing, on behalf of the European Union, and provisional application of the Exchange of Letters to obtain membership of the Extended Commission of the Convention for the Conservation of Southern Bluefin Tuna /* COM/2015/072 final - 2015/0037 (NLE) */**

			*

			*

EXPLANATORY MEMORANDUM

1.           CONTEXT OF THE PROPOSAL

The Commission for the Conservation of
Southern Bluefin Tuna (CCSBT) is a Regional Fisheries Management Organisation
(RFMO) responsible for the management of Southern Bluefin Tuna (SBF) throughout
its distribution. The Convention for the Conservation of Southern Bluefin tuna
entered into force on 20 May 1994.

The CCSBT Extended Commission was created
in April 2001 to allow fishing entities other than states to participate in the
works of the CCSBT. Currently the CCSBT Extended Commission includes all
members of the CCSBT plus fishing entities. In practice the CCSBT adopts the
decisions taken by the Extended Commission without further discussion.

The European Union has been a Cooperating
Non-Member of the CCSBT Extended Commission since 2006. Cooperating Non-Members
participate fully in the activities of the CCSBT but are not entitled to vote.
The status of Cooperating Non-Member requires adherence to the management and
conservation measures of the CCSBT.

The EU fleet does not target SBF. Catches
of SBF in its area of distribution by the EU fleet result from limited
by-catches of long-line fisheries targeting tuna and tuna like species mostly
in the Convention area of the Indian Ocean Tuna Commission (IOTC).

Since 2006 the EU has been allocated a
quota of 10 tonnes of SBF per year for by-catch in CCSBT. Conversely, the 2014
Fishing Opportunities Regulation[1] 
prohibits the targeting of SBF and explicitly mentions that the allocated EU
quota of 10 tonnes is to be used exclusively for the counting of by-catch.

The CCSBT Convention is only open to
States, excluding therefore Regional Economic Integration Organisations (REIOs)
like the EU. On 1 December 2009 the Council authorised the European Commission
to seek, on behalf of the European Union, an amendment to the rules of CCSBT in
order for the European Union to become a Contracting Party.[2]

After several years of discussions, the
CCSBT amended the Resolution governing the Extended Commission during its 20th
meeting in October 2013 to allow REIOs willing to do so to become a Member of
the Extended Commission (until then the only status allowed for REIOs was that
of Cooperating Non-Member) through Exchange of Letters in which the applicant
shall give the CCSBT its firm commitment to respect the terms of the Convention
and comply with decisions of the CCSBT Extended Commission.

Upon completion of this procedure the EU
would be entitled to membership and vote in the CCSBT Extended Commission and
Extended Scientific Committee.

The main interest in the CCSBT for the EU
lies in the similarities between the management of Southern Bluefin Tuna
(CCSBT) and Atlantic Bluefin Tuna (ICCAT) and the wish to ensure coherence in
the management of these stocks.

The Commission therefore recommends such
course of action in order to continue promoting consistency in the Union's
conservation approach across oceans and reinforcing its commitment to the
long-term conservation and sustainable use of fisheries resources globally.

2.           RESULTS OF CONSULTATIONS
WITH THE INTERESTED PARTIES AND IMPACT ASSESSMENTS

Not relevant.

3.           LEGAL ELEMENTS OF THE
PROPOSAL

The proposal seeks to authorise the
Exchange of Letters between the EU and the CCSBT in order for the EU to become
a full Member of the CCSBT Extended Commission from its current status of
Cooperating Non-Member. The European Union has been a Cooperating Non-Member of
the CCSBT Extended Commission since 2006.

4.           BUDGETARY IMPLICATION

Annual expenditure will depend on the EU
contribution to the CCSBT's budget decided at its Annual Meeting, currently
estimated at roughly 70 000 € per year.

5.           OPTIONAL ELEMENTS

2015/0037 (NLE)

Proposal for a

COUNCIL DECISION

on the signing, on behalf of the European
Union, and provisional application of the Exchange of Letters to obtain
membership of the Extended Commission of the Convention for the Conservation of
Southern Bluefin Tuna

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the
Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 43(2) in
conjunction with Article 218(5) thereof,

Having regard to the proposal from the
European Commission,

Whereas:

(1)       (1)        The Union is
competent to adopt measures for the conservation of marine biological resources
under the common fisheries policy and to enter into agreements with third
countries and international organisations.

(2)       Pursuant to Council
Decision 98/392/EC ([3]),
the Union is a Contracting Party to the United Nations Convention on the Law of
the Sea of 10 December 1982, which requires all members of the international
community to cooperate in conserving and managing the biological resources of
the sea.

(3)       Pursuant to Council
Decision 98/414/EC ([4]),
the Union is a Contracting Party to the Agreement on the implementation of the
provisions of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea of 10
December 1982, relating to the Conservation and Management of Straddling Fish
Stocks and Highly Migratory Fish Stocks.

(4)       On 1 December 2009 the
Council authorised the European Commission to seek, on behalf of the European
Union, an amendment to the rules of Convention for the Conservation of Southern
Bluefin Tuna in order for the European Union to become a Contracting Party.

(5)       During its 20th meeting in
October 2013, the Commission for the Conservation of Southern Bluefin Tuna
amended the Resolution governing the Extended Commission to allow the European
Union to become a Member of the CCSBT Extended Commission through Exchange of
Letters.

(6)       Since vessels flying the
flags of Member States of the Union fish resources in the area of distribution
of Southern Bluefin Tuna, it is in the Union's interest to sign and
provisionally apply the Exchange of Letters for Membership of the CCSBT
Extended Commission in order to play an effective role in the implementation of
the Convention.

(7)       Upon completion of this
procedure the EU would be entitled to membership and vote in the CCSBT Extended
Commission and Extended Scientific Committee.

(8)       Such course of action will
also promote consistency in the Union's conservation approach across oceans and
reinforce its commitment to the long-term conservation and sustainable use of
fisheries resources globally,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The signature and provisional application
of the Exchange of Letters to obtain Membership of the Extended Commission of
the Convention for the Conservation of Southern Bluefin Tuna is hereby approved
on behalf of the Union.

Article 2

The President of the Council is hereby
authorised to designate the person(s) empowered to sign the Exchange of Letters
on behalf of the Union

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on the
day of its adoption.

Done at Brussels,

For
the Council

The
President

LEGISLATIVE FINANCIAL STATEMENT

1.           FRAMEWORK OF THE
PROPOSAL/INITIATIVE

1.1.    Title of the proposal/initiative

1.2.    Policy
area(s) concerned in the ABM/ABB structure

1.3.    Nature
of the proposal/initiative

1.4.    Objective(s)

1.5.    Grounds
for the proposal/initiative

1.6.    Duration
and financial impact

1.7.    Management
mode(s) planned

2.           MANAGEMENT MEASURES

2.1.    Monitoring
and reporting rules

2.2.    Management
and control system

2.3.    Measures
to prevent fraud and irregularities

3.           ESTIMATED FINANCIAL
IMPACT OF THE PROPOSAL/INITIATIVE

3.1.    Heading(s)
of the multiannual financial framework and expenditure budget line(s) affected

3.2.    Estimated
impact on expenditure

3.2.1. Summary of
estimated impact on expenditure

3.2.2. Estimated impact
on operational appropriations

3.2.3. Estimated impact
on appropriations of an administrative nature

3.2.4. Compatibility
with the current multiannual financial framework

3.2.5. Third-party
contributions

3.3.    Estimated impact on revenue

LEGISLATIVE FINANCIAL STATEMENT

1.           FRAMEWORK OF THE
PROPOSAL/INITIATIVE

1.1.        Title of the
proposal/initiative

1) Proposal for a Council Decision on the signing, on behalf of the
European Union, and provisional application of the Exchange of Letters to
obtain membership of the Extended Commission of the Convention for the
Conservation of Southern Bluefin Tuna

2) Proposal for a Council Decision to conclude, on behalf of the
European Union, the Exchange of Letters to obtain membership of the Extended
Commission of the Convention for the Conservation of Southern Bluefin Tuna

1.2.        Policy area(s) concerned
in the ABM/ABB structure[5]

11 03: To promote sustainable fisheries and healthy seas globally
(RFMOs and SFPAs)

1.3.        Nature of the
proposal/initiative

 ̈ The
proposal/initiative relates to a new action

 ̈ The
proposal/initiative relates to a new action following a pilot
project/preparatory action[6]

X The proposal/initiative relates to the extension of an existing
action

 ̈ The
proposal/initiative relates to an action redirected towards a new action

1.4.        Objective(s)

1.4.1.     The Commission's multiannual
strategic objective(s) targeted by the proposal/initiative

Contribution to long-term sustainability of fisheries worldwide,
measured by the number of emblematic tuna stocks fished with a fishing
mortality rate being at or below Fmsy levels as per relevant scientific advice.

1.4.2.     Specific objective(s) and
ABM/ABB activity(ies) concerned

Specific objective No 'RFMOs and SFPAs':

To contribute to long-term sustainability of fisheries worldwide
through an active involvement in international organisations and by concluding
sustainable fisheries partnership agreements with third countries.

ABM/ABB activity(ies) concerned

ABB activity 11 03: To promote sustainable fisheries and healthy
seas globally (RFMOs and SFPAs)

1.4.3.     Expected result(s) and
impact

Specify the effects
which the proposal/initiative should have on the beneficiaries/groups targeted.

The proposal seeks to ensure that the EU contributes to the
long-term management of Southern Bluefin Tuna in accordance with scientific
advice by becoming a Member of the CCSBT Extended Commission and Extended
Scientific Committee from the current status of Cooperating Non-Member.

Cooperating Non-Members participate fully in the activities of the
CCSBT but are not entitled to vote. The status of Cooperating Non-Member
requires adherence to the management and conservation objectives and measures
of the CCSBT.

1.4.4.     Indicators of results and
impact

Specify the
indicators for monitoring implementation of the proposal/initiative.

- Participation of the EU at the CCSBT meetings

- Improved long-term sustainability of the Southern Bluefin Tuna
stocks

1.5.        Grounds for the
proposal/initiative

1.5.1.     Requirement(s) to be met in
the short or long term

The CCSBT opened the participation of Regional Integration Organisations
(RIOs) as Members of the CCSBT Extended Committee at its Annual Meeting in
2013.

The main objective of the Council Decision is to allow the EU to
become Member of the CCSBT Extended Commission. This is necessary to ensure the
vote of the EU in the proceedings of CCSBT whose main goals are to promote the
long-term conservation and sustainable use of Southern Bluefin Tuna through
cooperation among the Contracting Parties.

1.5.2.     Added value of EU
involvement

The main interest in the CCSBT for the EU lies in the similarities
between the management of Southern Bluefin Tuna (CCSBT) and Atlantic Bluefin
Tuna (ICCAT) and the wish to ensure coherence in the management of these
stocks.

1.5.3.     Lessons learned from
similar experiences in the past

The EU, represented by the Commission, plays an active role in six
tuna organisations and 11 non-tuna Regional Fisheries Management Organisations
(RFMOs). RFMOs are international organisations formed by countries with fishing
interests in an area. Some of them manage all the fish stocks found in a
specific area, while others focus on particular highly-migratory species,
notably tuna, throughout vast geographical areas. The organisations are open
both to countries in the region (“coastal states”) and countries with interests
in the fisheries concerned.

While some RFMOs have a purely advisory role, most have management
powers to set catch and fishing effort limits, technical measures, and control
obligations.

Lessons learnt from the past indicate that the EU should direct its
efforts at tackling the main difficulties preventing RFMOs from delivering on
their mandates, by directing its actions along the following policy lines:

•        The functioning of RFMOs should be enhanced through
systematically conducted performance reviews, in line with the appropriate UN
Resolutions;

•        More reliable scientific data and advice should be
available to RFMOs through increasing the EU's investment in data collection,
applied research, scientific knowledge and in RFMOs' scientific activities
while encouraging other RFMO Members to do the same. The EU should also promote
a wider scope of scientific advice, notably through an implementation of the
precautionary and ecosystem approaches and complementing them with the tools of
socio-economic analysis;

•        To remedy the current situation of poor compliance of some
Members with RFMOs' conservation and management measures, the EU should promote
the following:

–        A periodic review of the compliance records of each
individual Party in the respective RFMOs;

–        Identification of reasons for the lack of compliance (e.g.
lack of capacity in developing countries) and addressing them in an
appropriate, focused manner;

–        Development and implementation of transparent and
non-discriminatory sanctions in cases of clear lack of compliance or political
engagement by Parties. This process could be accompanied by incentives to
reward "complying" and "transparent" actors (flag States or
fleets).

•        Overcapacity is an issue to be addressed both on a
multilateral level (the EU launching an initiative together with its main
partners) and RFMO level. The EU should advocate tackling overcapacity through
a review of the best available scientific advice on sustainable levels of catch
and consideration of measures to address it. Such measures could include
capacity freeze or reduction while taking into account the aspirations of the
developing States to develop their own fishery sector.

•        Adoption of decisions on management measures through
consensus is the best guarantee for the highest level of compliance.
Nevertheless, the EU should advocate a reform of decision-making systems in
RFMOs, in particular to allow for voting, where necessary.

1.5.4.     Compatibility and possible
synergy with other appropriate instruments

The proposal drives forward the global and multilateral agenda
promoting sustainable fisheries worldwide to address crucial issues such as
eradication of illegal, unreported and unregulated (IUU) fishing or reduction
of overcapacity.

Better integrates the fisheries, development, environment, trade and
other policies to further advance the objectives of sustainable and responsible
governance.

1.6.        Duration and financial
impact

 ̈ Proposal/initiative of limited
duration

– 
 ̈  Proposal/initiative in effect from [DD/MM]YYYY to [DD/MM]YYYY

– 
 ̈  Financial impact from YYYY to YYYY

X Proposal/initiative of unlimited
duration

– 
Implementation with a start-up period from YYYY
to YYYY,

– 
followed by full-scale operation.

1.7.        Management mode(s) planned

X Direct management by the
Commission

– 
X by its departments, including by its staff in
the Union delegations;

– 
 ̈  by the executive agencies

 ̈ Shared management with the Member States

 ̈ Indirect management by entrusting budget implementation tasks to:

– 
 ̈ third countries or the bodies they have designated;

– 
 ̈ international organisations and their agencies (to be specified);

– 
 ̈the EIB and the European Investment Fund;

– 
 ̈ bodies referred to in Articles 208 and 209 of the Financial
Regulation;

– 
 ̈ public law bodies;

– 
 ̈ bodies governed by private law with a public service mission to the
extent that they provide adequate financial guarantees;

– 
 ̈ bodies governed by the private law of a Member State that are
entrusted with the implementation of a public-private partnership and that
provide adequate financial guarantees;

– 
 ̈ persons entrusted with the implementation of specific actions in
the CFSP pursuant to Title V of the TEU, and identified in the relevant basic
act.

– If more than one management mode is
indicated, please provide details in the ‘Comments’ section.

Comments

2.           MANAGEMENT MEASURES

2.1.        Monitoring and reporting
rules

Specify frequency
and conditions.

Each year, theCCBST’s budget is adopted. The Extended Commission may
examine, verify and comment on the draft budget submitted by the CCSBT Secretariat.
The execution of these budgets is also scrutinised every year by the
Contracting Parties. The budget is to be adopted by consensus of the
Contracting Parties.

Reporting is also done on annual basis by the CCSBT Secretariat.

2.2.        Management and control
system

2.2.1.     Risk(s) identified

CCSBT Members regularly pay their contributions and currently there
are no arrears.

2.2.2.     Information concerning the
internal control system set up

CCSBT expenditure is reviewed by the Finance and Administration Committee.
Some specific programms are audited.

2.2.3.     Estimate of the costs and
benefits of the controls and assessment of the expected level of risk of error

Limited costs. Peer review. Subsequent revisions.

2.3.        Measures to prevent fraud
and irregularities

Specify existing or
envisaged prevention and protection measures.

The budget and expenditure are prepared by the CCSBT Secretariat,
then reviewed and endorsed by the Finance and Administration Committee and
approved by the CCSBT Extended Commission.

3.           ESTIMATED FINANCIAL
IMPACT OF THE PROPOSAL/INITIATIVE

3.1.        Heading(s) of the
multiannual financial framework and expenditure budget line(s) affected

· Existing budget lines

In order of
multiannual financial framework headings and budget lines.

Heading of multiannual financial framework || Budget line || Type of expenditure || Contribution

Number || Diff./Non-diff. || from EFTA countries || from candidate countries || from third countries || within the meaning of Article 21(2)(b) of the Financial Regulation

|| 11 03 02 Contribution to International Organisations (2) || Diff. || NO || NO || NO || NO

|| 11 01 04 01 : Contribution to International Organisations  - Expenditure on administrative management (2) || Non-diff. || NO || NO || NO || NO

|| 11 01 02 11: Other management expenditure (5) || Non-diff. || NO || NO || NO || NO

· New budget lines requested

In order of
multiannual financial framework headings and budget lines.

Heading of multiannual financial framework || Budget line || Type of expenditure || Contribution

Number || Diff./Non-diff. || from EFTA countries || from candidate countries || from third countries || within the meaning of Article 21(2)(b) of the Financial Regulation

|| || || || || ||

3.2.        Estimated impact on
expenditure

Annual expenditure will depend on the
contribution the EU must make to the Organisation's budget decided at the
Annual Meeting of the CCSBT (currently estimated at roughly 70.000 €)

3.2.1.     Summary of estimated impact
on expenditure

EUR million (to three decimal places)

Heading of multiannual financial framework || Number: 2 || Sustenable growth natural ressources ||

|| DG MARE || || || Year 2015 || Year 2016 || Year 2017 || Year 2018 || Year  2019 || Year 2020 || TOTAL

|| Ÿ Operational appropriations || || || || || || ||

|| 11. 03 02 || Commitments || (1) || 0.070 || 0.070 || 0.070 || 0.070 || 0.070 || 0.070 || 0.42

|| Payments || (2) || 0.070 || 0.070 || 0.070 || 0.070 || 0.070 || 0.070 || 0.42

|| Number of budget line || Commitments || (1a) || || || || || || ||

|| Payments || (2a) || || || || || || ||

|| Appropriations of an administrative nature financed from the envelope of specific programmes || || || || || || ||

|| Number of budget line11.01 04 01 || || (3) || 0.010 || 0.010 || 0.010 || 0.010 || 0.010 || 0.010 || 0.060

|| TOTAL appropriations for DG MARE || Commitments || =1+1a +3 || 0.080 || 0.080 || 0.080 || 0.080 || 0.080 || 0.080 || 0.48

|| Payments || =2+2a +3 || 0.080 || 0.080 || 0.080 || 0.080 || 0.080 || 0.080 || 0.48

Ÿ TOTAL operational appropriations || Commitments || (4) || 0.070 || 0.070 || 0.070 || 0.070 || 0.070 || 0.070 || 0.42

Payments || (5) || 0.070 || 0.070 || 0.070 || 0.070 || 0.070 || 0.070 || 0.42

Ÿ TOTAL appropriations of an administrative nature financed from the envelope for specific programmes || (6) || 0.010 || 0.010 || 0.010 || 0.010 || 0.010 || 0.010 || 0.60

TOTAL appropriations under HEADING <2> of the multiannual financial framework || Commitments || =4+ 6 || 0.080 || 0.080 || 0.080 || 0.080 || 0.080 || 0.080 || 0.48

Payments || =5+ 6 || 0.080 || 0.080 || 0.080 || 0.080 || 0.080 || 0.080 || 0.48

If more than one heading is affected by the proposal /
initiative:

Ÿ TOTAL operational appropriations || Commitments || (4) || || || || || || || ||

Payments || (5) || || || || || || || ||

Ÿ TOTAL appropriations of an administrative nature financed from the envelope for specific programmes || (6) || || || || || || || ||

TOTAL appropriations under HEADINGS 1 to 4 of the multiannual financial framework (Reference amount) || Commitments || =4+ 6 || || || || || || || ||

Payments || =5+ 6 || || || || || || || ||

Heading of multiannual financial framework || 5 || ‘Administrative expenditure’

EUR million (to three decimal places)

|| || || Year 2015 || Year 2016 || Year 2017 || Year 2018 || Year 2019 || Year 2020 || TOTAL

DG MARE || || ||

Ÿ Human resources || 0.026 || 0.026 || 0.026 || 0.026 || 0.026 || 0.026 || 0.156

Ÿ Other administrative expenditure || 0.008 || 0.008 || 0.008 || 0.008 || 0.008 || 0.008 || 0.048

TOTAL DG MARE || Appropriations || 0.034 || 0.034 || 0.034 || 0.034 || 0.034 || 0.034 || 0.204

TOTAL appropriations under HEADING 5 of the multiannual financial framework || (Total commitments = Total payments) || 0.034 || 0.034 || 0.034 || 0.034 || 0.034 || 0.034 || 0.204

EUR million (to three decimal places)

|| || || Year N || Year N+1 || Year N+2 || Year N+3 || Year N+4 || Year N+5 || TOTAL

TOTAL appropriations under HEADINGS 1 to 5 of the multiannual financial framework || Commitments || 0.114 || 0.114 || 0.114 || 0.114 || 0.114 || 0.114 || 0.684

Payments || 0.114 || 0.114 || 0.114 || 0.114 || 0.114 || 0.114 || 0.684

3.2.2.     Estimated impact on
operational appropriations

– 
 ̈  The proposal/initiative does not require the use of operational
appropriations

– 
X  The proposal/initiative requires the use of
operational appropriations, as explained below:

Commitment appropriations in EUR million (to three
decimal places)

Indicate objectives and outputs ò || || || Year 2015 || Year 2016 || Year 2017 || Year 2018 || Year 2019 || Year 2020 || TOTAL

|| || OUTPUTS

Type || Average cost || No || Cost || No || Cost || No || Cost || No || Cost || No || Cost || No || Cost || Total No || Total cost

SPECIFIC OBJECTIVE No 1 RFMO and SFPAs': To contribute to long-term sustainability of fisheries worldwide through an active involvement in international organisations and by concluding sustainable fisheries partnership agreements with third countries || || || || || || || || || || || || ||

Membership in CCSBT || || || 1 || 0.07 || 1 || 0.07 || 1 || 0.07 || 1 || 0.07 || 1 || 0.07 || 1 || 0.07 || 1 || 0.42

- Output || || || || || || || || || || || || || || || ||

- Output || || || || || || || || || || || || || || || ||

Subtotal for specific objective No 1 || 1 || 0.07 || 1 || 0.07 || 1 || 0.07 || 1 || 0.07 || 1 || 0.07 || 1 || 0.07 || 1 || 0.42

TOTAL COST || 1 || 0.07 || 1 || 0.07 || 1 || 0.07 || 1 || 0.07 || 1 || 0.07 || 1 || 0.07 || 1 || 0.42

3.2.3.     Estimated impact on
appropriations of an administrative nature

3.2.3.1.  Summary

– 
 ̈  The proposal/initiative does not require the use of appropriations
of an administrative nature

– 
X  The proposal/initiative requires the use of
appropriations of an administrative nature, as explained below:

EUR million (to
three decimal places)

|| Year 2015 || Year 2016 || Year 2017 || Year 2018 || Year 2019 || Year 2020 || TOTAL

HEADING 5 of the multiannual financial framework || || || || || || ||

Human resources || 0.026 || 0.026 || 0.026 || 0.026 || 0.026 || 0.026 || 0.156

Other administrative expenditure || 0.008 || 0.008 || 0.008 || 0.008 || 0.008 || 0.008 || 0.048

Subtotal HEADING 5 of the multiannual financial framework || 0.034 || 0.034 || 0.034 || 0.034 || 0.034 || 0.034 || 0.204

Outside HEADING 5 of the multiannual financial framework || || || || || || ||

Human resources || || || || || || ||

Other expenditure of an administrative nature || 0.010 || 0.010 || 0.010 || 0.010 || 0.010 || 0.010 || 0.060

Subtotal outside HEADING 5 of the multiannual financial framework || 0.010 || 0.010 || 0.010 || 0.010 || 0.010 || 0.010 || 0.060

TOTAL || 0.044 || 0.044 || 0.044 || 0.044 || 0.044 || 0.044 || 0.264

The appropriations
required for human resources and other expenditure of an administrative nature
will be met by appropriations from the DG that are already assigned to
management of the action and/or have been redeployed within the DG, together if
necessary with any additional allocation which may be granted to the managing
DG under the annual allocation procedure and in the light of budgetary
constraints.

3.2.3.2.  Estimated requirements of
human resources

– 
 ̈  The proposal/initiative does not require the use of human
resources.

– 
X  The proposal/initiative requires the use of
human resources, as explained below:

Estimate to be expressed in full time
equivalent units

|| || Year N || Year N+1 || Year N+2 || Year  N+3 || Year  N+4 || Year  N+5 ||

|| Ÿ Establishment plan posts (officials and temporary staff) || ||

|| XX 01 01 01 (Headquarters and Commission’s Representation Offices) || 0.2 || 0.2 || 0.2 || 0.2 || 0.2 || 0.2 ||

|| XX 01 01 02 (Delegations) || || || || || || ||

|| XX 01 05 01 (Indirect research) || || || || || || ||

|| 10 01 05 01 (Direct research) || || || || || || ||

Ÿ External staff (in Full Time Equivalent unit: FTE) ||

|| XX 01 02 01 (AC, END, INT from the ‘global envelope’) || || || || || || ||

|| XX 01 02 02 (AC, AL, END, INT and JED in the delegations) || || || || || || ||

|| XX 01 04 yy || - at Headquarters || || || || || || ||

|| - in Delegations || || || || || || ||

|| XX 01 05 02 (AC, END, INT - Indirect research) || || || || || || ||

|| 10 01 05 02 (AC, END, INT - Direct research) || || || || || || ||

|| Other budget lines (specify) || || || || || || ||

|| TOTAL || || || || || || ||

XX is the policy area or budget title
concerned.

The human resources
required will be met by staff from the DG who are already assigned to
management of the action and/or have been redeployed within the DG, together if
necessary with any additional allocation which may be granted to the managing
DG under the annual allocation procedure and in the light of budgetary
constraints.

Description of
tasks to be carried out:

Officials and temporary staff || Elaborate and contribute toward the definition of EU policies concerning the political, economic and technical aspects of internationa co-operation in the field of international fisheries. Represent the Union at meetings organised by CCSBT to present and defend the Union's position, as defined through the appropriate internal and institutional procedures. Ensure the liaison between the Extended Commission, Member States and the CCSBT Secretariat for the execution of intersessional work and tasks in the framework of CCSBT.

External staff ||

3.2.4.     Compatibility with the
current multiannual financial framework

– 
X  The proposal/initiative is compatible the
current multiannual financial framework.

– 
 ̈  The proposal/initiative will entail reprogramming of the relevant
heading in the multiannual financial framework.

Explain what reprogramming is required,
specifying the budget lines concerned and the corresponding amounts.

– 
 ̈  The proposal/initiative requires application of the flexibility
instrument or revision of the multiannual financial framework.

Explain what is required, specifying the
headings and budget lines concerned and the corresponding amounts.

3.2.5.     Third-party contributions

– 
The proposal/initiative does not provide for
co-financing by third parties.

Appropriations in EUR million (to three decimal places)

|| Year N || Year N+1 || Year N+2 || Year N+3 || Enter as many years as necessary to show the duration of the impact (see point 1.6) || Total

Specify the co-financing body || || || || || || || ||

TOTAL appropriations co-financed || || || || || || || ||

3.3.        Estimated impact on
revenue

– 
X  The proposal/initiative has no financial
impact on revenue.

– 
 ̈  The proposal/initiative has the following financial impact:

– 
 ̈         on own resources

– 
 ̈         on miscellaneous revenue

EUR
million (to three decimal places)

Budget revenue line: || Appropriations available for the current financial year || Impact of the proposal/initiative[7]

Year N || Year N+1 || Year N+2 || Year N+3 || Enter as many years as necessary to show the duration of the impact (see point 1.6)

Article ............. || || || || || || || ||

For miscellaneous
‘assigned’ revenue, specify the budget expenditure line(s) affected.

Specify the method for
calculating the impact on revenue.

[1]               See
Annex IG of Regulation No 43/2014 of 20 January 2014 fixing for 2014 the
fishing opportunities for certain fish stocks and groups of fish stocks,
applicable in Union waters and, to Union vessels, in certain non-EU waters ,
Official Journal of the European Union, L 24, 28.1.2014

[2]               16936/09
PECHE 364

[3]               OJ
L 179, 23.6.1998, p. 1.

[4]               OJ
L 189, 3.7.1998, p. 14.

[5]               ABM:
activity-based management; ABB: activity-based budgeting.

[6]               As
referred to in Article 54(2)(a) or (b) of the Financial Regulation.

[7]               As
regards traditional own resources (customs duties, sugar levies), the amounts
indicated must be net amounts, i.e. gross amounts after deduction of 25 %
for collection costs.

ANNEX

to the

Proposal for a Council Decision

on the signing, on behalf of the
European Union, and provisional application of the Exchange of Letters to
obtain membership in the Extended Commission of the Convention for the
Conservation of Southern Bluefin Tuna (CCSBT)

A. Letter
from the European Union

Sir/Madam,

I have the honour to refer to the Resolution
to establish an extended Commission and an Extended Scientific Committee
(hereafter ‘the Resolution’), as amended by the 20th Meeting of the CCSBT in
October 2013.

Paragraph 6 of the Resolution establishes that any regional economic integration
organisation, entity or fishing entity, vessels flagged to which have caught SBT at
any time in the previous three calendar years, may express its willingness to
the Executive Secretary of the Commission to become a member of the Extended
Commission and Extended Scientific Committee. To this end, the Executive
Secretary of the CCSBT, on behalf of the Commission, will conduct an Exchange
of Letters with the representative of such regional economic integration
organisation, entity or fishing entity to this effect.

Regarding Paragraph 7 of the Resolution there are no changes to the
EU entitlement of 10 tonnes for the years 2015-2017.

I should be obliged if you would acknowledge
receipt of this letter and confirm that this letter and your reply constitute
an Agreement between the CCSBT and the European Union to become Member of the
CCSBT Extended Commission and Extended Scientific Committee in accordance with
the provisions contained in the Resolution mentioned above.

The EU would like to indicate its firm commitment to continue to
respect the terms of the CCSBT Convention and comply with decisions of the
Extended Commission.

This agreement will apply from the day following
the day of your reply.

Please accept, Sir/Madam, the assurance of my highest
consideration.

For the European Union

The
President