alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned certifies
that to the best of his knowledge (1) this Quarterly Report of Corporate Capital Trust, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2013, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (this Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and (2) the information contained in this Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition of the Company as of September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012 and its results of operations for the period ended September 30, 2013.

|                        |  |  |  |                          |  |                                                                           
|----------------------- |  |  |  | ------------------------ |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                        |  | 
|Date: November 14, 2013 |  |  |  | /s/ Andrew A. Hyltin    
|                        |  |  |  |                          |  | Andrew A. Hyltin Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)    
|                        |  | 
|Date: November 14, 2013 |  |  |  | /s/ Paul S. Saint-Pierre
|                        |  |  |  |                          |  | Paul S. Saint-Pierre Chief Financial
Officer (Principal Financial Officer)
#### FLORIDA STATE HOSPITAL, Petitioner, v. Annie Nadine VICKERY and State of Florida Department of Commerce, Industrial Relations Commission, Respondents.

No. 43620.

Supreme Court of Florida.

June 8, 1973.

Certiorari denied.

CARLTON, C. J., and ROBERTS, BOYD, McCAIN and DEKLE, JJ., concur.
260 La. 1137

#### Richard J. DUNN v. PARISH OF JEFFERSON.

No. 52226.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

March 8, 1972.

In re: Parish of Jefferson applying for certiorari or writ of review to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, Parish of Jefferson. 256 So.2d 664.

Writ denied. The result is correct.
#### Helen McMILLAN v. STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE CO. et al. Thomas HUTCHINSON v. STATE FARM INSURANCE CO. et al.

No. 60689.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Oct. 26, 1977.

In re: State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co., and Helen J. Stilley applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, Parish of Livingston, 349 So.2d 949.

Granted.

It is ordered that the writ of review issue; that the Court of Appeal send up the record in duplicate of the case; and that counsel for plaintiff and defendant be notified.
#### In re ESTATE of John A. OSTMAN, Deceased.

No. 66-125.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Third District.

Feb. 15, 1967.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed.
1

Filed 9/6/13 P. v. Nicoll CA3

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for 

publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication 

or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT

(Tehama)

----

THE PEOPLE,

Plaintiff and Respondent,

v.

CHRISTINA RENEE NICOLL,

Defendant and Appellant.

C071815

(Super. Ct. No. NCR81054)

This case comes to us pursuant to People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436 (Wende). 

Having reviewed the record as required by Wende, we affirm the judgment. 

We provide the following brief description of the facts and procedural history of 

the case. (See People v. Kelly (2006) 40 Cal.4th 106, 110, 124.)

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

On February 2, 2011, around 11:00 p.m., defendant Christina Renee Nicoll 

became angry with her husband after he came home intoxicated. They first argued inside 
2

the house, where several items were broken and defendant threw her husband’s clothes 

on the front steps. The argument then moved outside, where defendant threw a rock at 

her husband, striking him in the forehead. Defendant then got into her car and drove 

toward where her husband was standing, causing him to jump out of the way. Next, 

she rammed her husband’s truck, causing her car to become stuck underneath the truck. 

Defendant showed signs of being under the influence of drugs, including displaying 

rapid eye movement, dilated pupils that did not react to light, rapid pulse, and quickly 

changing moods. She had also urinated in her pants.

Defendant pleaded guilty to corporal injury to a spouse (Pen. Code, § 273.5, 

subd. (a)) and driving under the influence of drugs or alcohol (Veh. Code, § 23152, 

subd. (a)), and was placed on three years’ formal probation. 

Defendant subsequently admitted violating her probation by smoking 

methamphetamine. The trial court revoked probation, sentenced defendant to three 

years in state prison and awarded 245 days of presentence credit (147 actual and 

98 conduct). The trial court subsequently amended the award of presentence credits 

to 294 days (147 actual and 147 conduct). 

Defendant obtained a certificate of probable cause (Pen. Code, § 1237.5) and 

appeals. 

DISCUSSION

We appointed counsel to represent defendant on appeal. Counsel filed an opening 

brief that sets forth the facts of the case and requests this court to review the record and 

determine whether there are any arguable issues on appeal. (Wende, supra, 25 Cal.3d 

436.) Defendant was advised by counsel of the right to file a supplemental brief within 

30 days of the date of filing of the opening brief. More than 30 days have elapsed, and 

we have received no communication from defendant. Having undertaken an examination 

of the entire record, we find no arguable error that would result in a disposition more 

favorable to defendant.
3

DISPOSITION

The judgment is affirmed.

 MURRAY , J.

We concur:

 BLEASE , Acting P. J.

 HOCH , J.
254 La. 798

#### STATE ex rel. Jack Wesley DENNIS v. C. M. HENDERSON, Warden Louisiana State Penitentiary.

No. 50161.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Oct. 14, 1969.

In re: Jack Wesley Dennis applying for writ of certiorari.

Application denied. The showing made 'does not warrant the exercise of our supervisory jurisdiction.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                             261
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    2,623
<ALLOWANCES>                                      (33)
<INVENTORY>                                      1,200
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 4,835
<PP&E>                                           7,664
<DEPRECIATION>                                   4,061
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  10,332
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              859
<BONDS>                                            412
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            37
<OTHER-SE>                                       8,994
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    10,332
<SALES>                                          4,407
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 5,407
<CGS>                                            2,957
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    1,366
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    88
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  14
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,066
<INCOME-TAX>                                       235
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                746
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       746
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .22
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .21


</TABLE>
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

December 30, 2014

No. 04-13-00558-CV

BRUINGTON ENGINEERING, LTD.,

Appellant

v.

PEDERNAL ENERGY, LLC,

Appellee

From the 49th Judicial District Court, Zapata County, Texas

Trial Court No. 7,767

Honorable Jose A Lopez, Judge Presiding

ORDER

Sitting: Catherine M. Stone, Chief Justice

Karen A. Angelini, Justice

Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice

Marialyn Barnard, Justice; dissenting, with opinion to follow

Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice; dissenting

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

Luz Elena Chapa, Justice; dissenting

On August 27, 2014, this court issued its opinion in this appeal. Appellee Pedernal 

Energy, L.L.C. filed a motion for en banc reconsideration, and this court requested a response 

from Appellant. 

Having considered Appellee’s motion and Appellant’s response, a majority of the en 

banc court votes to DENY the motion. See TEX. R. APP. P. 49.7.

_________________________________

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 30th day of December, 2014.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
Exhibit









Exhibit 4.3




November 28, 2016 




Securities and Exchange Commission
100 F Street, N.E.
Washington, D.C.  20549


		
	Re:
	The Scotts Miracle-Gro Company – Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2016 




Ladies and Gentlemen:


The Scotts Miracle-Gro Company, an Ohio corporation (“Scotts Miracle-Gro”), is today filing its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2016 (the “Form 10-K”).


Neither Scotts Miracle-Gro nor any of its consolidated subsidiaries has outstanding any instrument or agreement with respect to its long-term debt, other than those filed or incorporated by reference as an exhibit to the Form 10-K, under which the total amount of long-term debt authorized exceeds ten percent (10%) of the total assets of Scotts Miracle-Gro and its subsidiaries on a consolidated basis.  In accordance with the provisions of Item 601(b)(4)(iii) of SEC Regulation S-K, Scotts Miracle-Gro hereby agrees to furnish to the SEC, upon request, a copy of each such instrument or agreement defining the rights of holders of long-term debt of Scotts Miracle-Gro or the rights of holders of long-term debt of one of Scotts Miracle-Gro’s consolidated subsidiaries, in each case which is not being filed or incorporated by reference as an exhibit to the Form 10-K.


Very truly yours,


THE SCOTTS MIRACLE-GRO COMPANY


/s/ THOMAS RANDAL COLEMAN


Thomas Randal Coleman
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer


14111 Scottslawn Road Marysville, OH 43041 937-644-0011     
www.scotts.com
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAY-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JUN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAY-31-2000
<CASH>                                               5
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     5
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       5
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,644
<OTHER-SE>                                     (1,639)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         5
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                         0
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
#### In the Interest of the minor Leonard Keith JACKSON.

No. 54203.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Dec. 19, 1973.

In re: Kenneth Jackson applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, Parish of Jefferson,

It is ordered that the writ of review issue; that the Court of Appeal send up the record in duplicate of the case; and that counsel for plaintiff and defendant be notified.
EXHIBIT 21
                                SUBSIDIARIES

The Registrant has two wholly-owned subsidiaries: SEA, Inc. - A Delaware 
Corporation, and Nautical Realty A/S - A Danish Corporation.  The primary 
asset of Nautical Realty A/S was sold during the year and the dissolution of 
Nautical Realty A/S commenced October 1, 1997.

The Registrant has a 97.5% owned subsidiary - Narrowband Network Systems, 
Inc. - A Washington Corporation, and a 60% owned subsidiary - Datamarine 
International Australia PTY, LTD. - A New South Wales, Australia 
Corporation.
#### Lillian SMITH, Appellant, v. Wayne N. SMITH, Appellee.

No. 70-523.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Oct. 6, 1970.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
#### Andrea Sue FAULK, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 72-1384.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

March 20, 1973.

Andrea Sue Faulk, in pro. per.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., for ap-pellee.

Before PEARSON, CHARLES CARROLL and HENDRY, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

This court, proceeding in the manner outlined and recommended by the Supreme Court of the United States in Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 744, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493, having deferred ruling on a motion of the public defender to withdraw as counsel for the indigent defendant-appellant, and having furnished appellant *549with a copy of the public defender’s memorandum brief, and having allowed the appellant a reasonable specified time within which to raise any points that he chose in support of this appeal, and the appellant having failed to respond thereto, on consideration thereof upon full examination of the proceedings we conclude that the appeal is wholly frivolous. Whereupon, the public defender’s said motion to withdraw is granted, and the order or judgment appealed is hereby affirmed.
# C_2014049EN.01000102.xml

| 21.2.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 49/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.2.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 49/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.6454 — Limagrain/KWS/Genective JV)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2014/C 49/02)

On 27 June 2013, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32013M6454. EUR-Lex is the online access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32013M6454. EUR-Lex is the online access to the European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
# C_2014338EN.01002901.xml

| 27.9.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 338/29 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.9.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 338/29

---

Information communicated by Member States regarding closure of fisheries

2014/C 338/07

In accordance with Article 35(3) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1224/2009 of 20 November 2009 establishing a Community control system for ensuring compliance with the rules of the common fisheries policy (1), a decision has been taken to close the fishery as set down in the following table:

1

| Date and time of closure | 28.8.2014 |
| --- | --- |
| Duration | 28.8.2014-31.12.2014 |
| Member State | Ireland |
| Stock or Group of stocks | RNG/8X14- |
| Species | Roundnose grenadier (Coryphaenoides rupestris) |
| Zone | EU and international waters of VIII, IX, X, XII and XIV |
| Type(s) of fishing vessels | — |
| Reference number | 36/DSS |

Date and time of closure

28.8.2014

Duration

28.8.2014-31.12.2014

Member State

Ireland

Stock or Group of stocks

RNG/8X14-

Species

Roundnose grenadier (Coryphaenoides rupestris)

Coryphaenoides rupestris

Zone

EU and international waters of VIII, IX, X, XII and XIV

Type(s) of fishing vessels

—

Reference number

36/DSS

---

(1)  OJ L 343, 22.12.2009, p. 1.

1

---
**Exhibit 23**

 
|   |   |                      | [Letterhead] |
|--------|--------|---------------------------|--------------|
|   |   | Deloitte & Touche LLP |
|   |   | 111 S. Wacker Drive       |
|   |   | Chicago,  Illinois 60606  |

 

 

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENTREGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

 

 

We consent to theincorporation by reference in Registration Statement Nos. 333-86790, 333-108705,and 333-128071 of John Deere Capital Corporation and subsidiaries on Form S-3of our report dated December 16, 2005, appearing in the Annual Report onForm 10-K of John Deere Capital Corporation and subsidiaries for theyear ended October 31, 2005, and to the reference to us under the heading “Experts”in the Prospectus, which is part of such Registration Statements.

 

 

DELOITTE &TOUCHE LLP

Chicago, Illinois

 

December 16, 2005

 

----
#### STATE of Florida, Appellant, v. Dale Edward HOLLINGSHEAD, Appellee.

Nos. 70-857 and 70-861.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

May 14, 1971.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Charles W. Musgrove, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellant.

L. B. Vocelle and Charles E. Thomson, Vero Beach, for appellee.

OWEN, Judge.

Dale Edward Hollingshead was separately informed against for leaving the scene of an accident involving a fatality, proscribed by F.S. Section 317.071, F.S.A., and manslaughter by operation of a motor vehicle while intoxicated, proscribed by F.S. Section 860.01, F.S.A. The state appeals an. identical order in each case, which granted defendant’s motion to suppress the results of blood tests administered to him in the hospital after his arrest following the accident.

Mr. Hollingshead did not voluntarily consent to the withdrawal of the blood sample. We think it evident from the record that the court granted the motions to suppress the blood test solely because of the absence of voluntary consent on the part of the defendant. However, the trial court did not at that time have the benefit of the opinion of the Supreme Court of Florida in the case of State v. Mitchell, 245 So.2d 618, opinion filed March 3, 1971, recognizing that under certain circumstances the donor’s voluntary consent to withdrawal of a blood sample is immaterial. See also, Schmerber v. State of California, 384 U.S. 757, 86 S.Ct. 1826, 16 L.Ed.2d 908 (1966), and Wilson v. State, Fla.1969, 225 So.2d 321.

The order appealed in each case is reversed and these causes remanded for the purpose of the motions being further considered in light of the authorities above cited, with the court authorized to conduct a further evidentiary hearing on the motion in each case to the extent it deems it necessary or desirable to do so.

Reversed and remanded.

WALDEN and REED, JJ., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>      5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED
FROM DIONICS, INC.'S REPORT FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1997
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<PERIOD-TYPE>                  YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>              DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                   DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                         473,400
<SECURITIES>                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                  192,300
<ALLOWANCES>                   0
<INVENTORY>                    359,500
<CURRENT-ASSETS>               1,050,600
<PP&E>                         1,686,300
<DEPRECIATION>                 1,636,100
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                 1,121,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>          188,300
<BONDS>                        1,255,900
<COMMON>                       38,400
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>          0
<PREFERRED>                    0
<OTHER-SE>                     1,522,800
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>   1,121,000
<SALES>                        1,801,500
<TOTAL-REVENUES>               1,801,500
<CGS>                          1,264,200
<TOTAL-COSTS>                  1,626,600
<OTHER-EXPENSES>               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>             65,400
<INCOME-PRETAX>                147,500
<INCOME-TAX>                   1,400
<INCOME-CONTINUING>            146,100
<DISCONTINUED>                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                0
<CHANGES>                      0
<NET-INCOME>                   146,100
<EPS-PRIMARY>                  .040
<EPS-DILUTED>                  .039



</TABLE>