2008 D e c i sion s O p inion s of the U nit e d S t at e s C our t of Appe al s for the Thir d C ir c uit 9-18-2008 

# R ync a vage v . Ame r F ami l

y Li fe Ins P r e c e de n t i al or N on-P r e c e de n t i al : N on-P r e c e de nt i al D ocke t N o . 07-4013

F o l low thi s a nd a dd it ion al work s at : http://d i git alc ommon s .l a w . vi l l a nova . e du/thir dc ir c uit_2008

Thi s de c i sion i s br ou ght t o you for f r e e a nd ope n a c c e s s b y the O p inion s of the U nit e d S t at e s C our t of Appe al s for the Thir d C ir c uit at V i l l a no va U nive r sity S choo l of L a

w Di git al Reposit or y

. It h as be e n a c c ept e d for inclusion in 2008 D e c i sion s b y a n author i z e d a dmini s tr at or of V i l l a no va U nive r sity S choo l of L a

w Di git al Reposit or y

. F or mor e inform at ion, p le as e c ont a ct Be n j amin . C a rl s on@l a

w . vi l l a no va . e du . Re c omme nde d C it at ion " R ynca vag e v . Ame r F ami ly L i fe In s " (2008). 2008 D e cisio n s . P ape r 516. http://d i git alc ommon s .l a

w . vi l l a nova . e du/thir dc ir c uit_2008/516NOT P RE CE DE NT I AL UN I TED STATES CO UR T OF A PP EALS F O R T H E T H IR D C IR C U IT

___________ N o. 07- 4013

___________ J OSEPH RY NC AV AG E, A ppel l ant v. AM ERI CAN FAM I LY L I F E I NSURANCE C O M P A N Y O F C O L U M B U S , IN C .; AM ERI CAN FAM I LY L I F E I NSURANCE COM P ANY OF NE W YORK, I NC.

___________ O n A p p ea l from the U n it ed S tat es D istri ct C o u rt f o r th e M id d le D istric t o f P e n n sy lv a n ia ( D . C . C i vi l N o. 06- cv- 01711) M agi s t r at e J udge: T he H onor abl e M al achyE . M anni on

___________ Subm i t t ed U nderT hi r d C i r cui tL A R 34. 1( a)

Sept ember9, 2008 B efore: S L O V ITE R , F U E N T E S , and N Y G A A R D , C i rcui tJudg es.

( Fi l ed: Sept ember18, 2008)

___________ OPI NI ON O F THE COURT

___________ N Y G A A R D , C i r cui tJ udge.2

I n Penns y l vani a, a br eac h of contr actcl ai m has a s t atut e of l i m i t at i ons of four y ear s . 42 Pa. C ons . St at . A nn. § 5525( a) ( 8) . T he D i s t r i ctC our tdi s m i s s ed A ppel l ant J os eph R yncava ge’ s compl ai ntpur s uantt o Fed. R . C i v. P. 12( b) ( 6) beca us e i tw as fi l ed a f te r t h e a p p lic a b le s ta tu te o f lim ita tio n s h a d ru n o n h is b re a c h o f c o n tr a c t c la im s . R yncava ge i s an i ndepende ntcontr act orw ho s ol d i ns ur ance fort he A ppel l ee c o m p a n y . T h e iss u e in h is a c tio n is o v e r c o m m iss io n s R yn c a v a g e c o n ten d s h e w a s to r ece i ve. R yncava ge’ s amended compl ai nti ndi cat es t hathe “w as not i fi ed vi a a l et t eron Ju ly3 0 , 2 0 0 2 . . . co n f

irm in g th a t h is n e w b u sin e ss c o m m iss io n s a n d re n e w a ls w o u ld c e a se e f f e c tiv e A u g u st 2 9 , 2 0 0 2 .” T h e re c o rd a lso re f lec ts th a t th e A p p e llee sp e c if ica lly not i fi ed R yncava ge that“ef fec t i ve A ugus t29, 2002, y ou w i l l not[s i c] l ongerr ece i ve comm i s s i ons on new bus i nes s . ” R yncava ge s ued the A ppel l ee f orbr eac h of contr act , but f ile d h is o ri g in a l c o m p la in t o n A u g u s t 3 1 , 2 0 0 6 . R yncava ge ar gues t hatt he D i s t r i ctC our terr ed bynotext endi ng t he s t atut e of l i m i t at i ons pas tA ugus t29, 2006, beca us e hi s new comm i s s i on paym ent s w er e not ant i ci pat ed unt i l s om e l at er , uncert ai n dat e. H e al s o ar gues t hatt he A ppel l ee’ s l et t erof Ju ly3 0 , 2 0 0 2 , co u ld b e tre a ted a s a n a n ticip a to ryre p u d iatio n a n d th a t h e w a s e n tit led to a w a it A p p e lle e ’s f

a ilu re to p e rf

o rm b e f o re f ilin g s u it. W e have r evi ew ed the br i efs fi l ed byt he part i es and conc l ude that , es s ent i al l yfor t he r eas ons s etfor t h byt he D i s t r i ctC our t , i t s j udgm entw i l l be af fi r m ed.