alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Income Opportunity Realty Investors, Inc. 10-Q

Exhibit
32.1



Certification
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906

Of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



Each
of the undersigned officers of Income Opportunity Realty Investors, Inc., a Nevada corporation (the “Company”) hereby
certifies that:



| | (i) | The
    Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the nine months ended September 30, 2020 fully complies with the requirements
    of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (ii) | The
    information contained in the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the nine months ended September 30, 2020 fairly
    presents in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company, at and for the period
    indicated.
| | ---- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                            |     | INCOME
    OPPORTUNITY REALTY INVESTORS, INC.                                                                     
|--------------------------- | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                            |     |                                                                                                                   
|Date:
    November 12, 2020 | By: | /s/
    Gene S. Bertcher                                                                                          
|                            |     | Gene S. Bertcher                                                                                                  
|                            |     | Executive
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
        (Principal
Executive and Principal Financial Officer)
# C_2014013EN.01000101.xml

| 17.1.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 13/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.1.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 13/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.7105 — NTT Data Corporation/Everis Participaciones)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2014/C 13/01

On 7 January 2014, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32014M7105. EUR-Lex is the online access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32014M7105. EUR-Lex is the online access to the European law.

---
# U ni te d S ta te s Co ur t of A pp ea ls For the Eig hth Circu it

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ _ No. 1 8- 12 75

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ _ Alan Co le Ons ta d

ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll l Pla in ti

ff - App el la nt

v.

W en dy Kelle y , Direc to r of ADC (Orig in al ly nam ed as Wend y Kell y ); J am es Gib so n, Warde n, Var ne r Su pe r Max (Orig in al ly nam ed as Gi bs on ); F lo ria W as hi ng to n, M rs ., Clas si fic at io n Off ic er, Varn er Su pe r Max (Orig in al ly nam ed as W as hi ng to n) ; St ev en Ric ke tt s, M ajor , Tuck er Un it (Orig in al ly nam ed as R ic ke tt ); Doe s, Warde n (s ig ne d 2 nd st ep gri ev an ce); Dire ct or y (si gn ed 3rd st ep gri ev an ce); Dep ut y W ard en (at Tuck er Un it on 9/ 20 /1 6) ; M ars ha ll D. Reed , Depu ty D ire ct or ,

ADC; Will ia m s, Dep ut y

W ard en , Tuck er Un it

ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll l Defe nd

an ts - App el le es

__ __ __ __ __ __ App eal fro m

Uni te d S ta te s Di st ric t Co ur t fo r th e Eas te rn Dis tri ct of Ark an sa s - P in e Bl uf f

__ __ __ __ __ __ Su bm it te d: Sep te m

be r 19 , 20 18 Fi le d: Sep te m

be r 25 , 20 18 [Un pu bl is he d]

__ __ __ __ __ __ Befo re WOL LMAN, BOW MAN, an d S HEPHERD, Circ ui t J ud ge s.

__ __ __ __ __ __

PER CURI AM.In m at e Alan Co le Ons ta d ap pe al s fro m th e or de rs o f t h e Dis tri ct Co ur t 1

gr an ti ng su m

m ary jud gm en t to th e rem ai ni ng de fen da nt Ja m es Gib so n and en te rin g jud gm en t ag ai n st Ons ta d in hi s 42 U.S.C. § 19 83 act io n. Afte r de no vo rev ie w, vi ewin g th e reco rd in th e li gh t m os t fav or ab le to Ons ta d an d dr awin g al l reas on ab le in fere nc es in hi s fav or , we fin d no ba si s fo r ov ert ur ni ng th e D i s t r i c t C ou rt’s well

reas on ed de te rm in at io n th at Gib so n was en ti tl ed to qu al ifi ed im m un it y

. 2 See Jo hn so n

v. Bl au ka t , 45 3 F.3 d 11 08
, 11 12 (8 th Ci r. 20 06 ) (s ta nd ard of rev ie w). W e affi rm th e jud gm en t. See 8t h C ir. R . 47 B.

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ _

1 The Hon or ab l e J e r o m e T. Kearn ey , Uni te d St at es Mag is tra te Ju dg e fo r th e East ern Dis tri ct of Ark an sa s, to who m th e cas e was refe rred fo r fin al di sp os it io n by

co ns en t o f th e p art ie s, 2 8 U.S.C. § 63 6( c).

2 O n s t ad ha s ab an do ne d hi s cl ai m s ag ai ns t th e ot he r de fen da nt s. See Hes s v

. Abl es , 71 4 F.3d 10 48
, 10 51 n.2 (8 th Ci r. 20 13 ) (n ot in g th at a cl ai m was ab an do ne d be cau se th e ap pe ll an t di d no t “ br ie f th is co ur t on why di sm is sa l was in ap pr op ria te ”).

-2

-
# U n i ted S t a te s Cou r t o f Appe a l s F OR T HE D IS TRICT OF C OLUM BIA C IRCUI T

___ ___ ___ ___ 

## No. 24-5090 September Term, 2023 1: 24-c v -006 50-UNA Filed O n: August 2, 2 024 Matth ew Jones,

App ellant v . Judicial B ranch of

United Sta tes G overnme nt, App ellee ON A PPE A L FROM THE UNITED STA TES DIS TRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA BEFORE: Kat sas, Ra o, a nd Childs, Circuit Ju dges J U D G M E N T T his ap pea l was co nside red o n th e reco rd f rom the United Sta tes District Cou rt for th e District of

Colum bia a nd on the brief f iled b y ap pellan t. S ee Fed. R. Ap p. P

. 34(a )(2); D.C. Cir. Rule 34 (j). It is ORDERED A ND A DJUDGED tha t th e d istrict court’s o rder en tered March 2 7, 202 4, b e a f

f irmed . T he district cou rt correctly conclud ed tha t ap pellan t’s com plaintwas f rivolou s be cause it lacke d a n a rg uab le ba sis eithe r in law or in fact. Se e Neitzke v. W illiams, 4 90 U.S. 3 19, 32 5 (19 89); see also 2 8 U.S .C. § 191 5(e)(2)(B)(i)(providing tha t “the cou rt sha ll dismiss t he case at a ny time if the cou rt de term ines t hat

. . . th e action or a ppe al . . . is f rivolou s or m alicious”). Pursua nt t o D.C. Circuit Ru le 36 , th is dispo sition will no t be pu blished . T he Clerk is directe d to w ithho ld issua nce of the m and ate he rein u ntil seven d ays af ter reso lution of an y tim ely petition for rehe aring or pe tition for rehe aring en ban c. S ee Fed. R. Ap p. P. 4 1(b); D.C. Cir. Rule 41

. Per Curiam
FOR THE COURT: Mark J. La nger, Clerk BY: /s/ Daniel J. Reidy Depu ty Cl erk
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL  INFORMATION  EXTRACTED FROM THE BALANCE
SHEETS, STATEMENTS OF OPERATION,  STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY, STATEMENTS
OF CASH FLOWS,  AND THE NOTES  THERETO,  WHICH MAY BE FOUND ON PAGES F-1 THROUGH
F-12 OF THE COMPANY'S  FORM 10-K FOR THE PERIOD ENDED  DECEMBER 31, 1997, AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                     U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                         6,538
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  0
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               6,538
<PP&E>                                         0
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 6,538
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          2,109,950
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       23,144
<OTHER-SE>                                     (5,230,445)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   6,538
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               151
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               7,799
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (7,648)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (7,648)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (7,648)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (0.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (0.01)



</TABLE>
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Vernon Carter, Appellant.

[721 NYS2d 849]

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Defendant contends that he was denied effective assistance of counsel based upon the failure of defense counsel to request a hearing to determine whether his statement to the police should have been suppressed as the product of an illegal arrest. Defendant has failed to show that a motion to suppress on that ground, “if made, would have been successful and that counsel otherwise failed to provide meaningful representation” *(People v Willis,*261 AD2d 946, *lv denied*93 NY2d 1029). The police were dispatched at 2:30 a.m. to investigate an alarm at a clothing store, where they observed defendant exit through a door that had obviously been pried open. The police properly asked defendant his name *(see generally, People v De Bour,*40 NY2d 210, 223), and defendant made a statement in response to that inquiry. Supreme Court properly denied defendant’s motion to suppress the statement as involuntarily made *(see, People v Wiesmore,*204 AD2d 1003, 1003-1004, *lv denied*84 NY2d 873), and defendant has failed to show that the court would have suppressed his statement if defense counsel had sought a probable cause hearing. Upon our review of the record, we conclude that defendant was provided meaningful representation *(see, People v Benevento,*91 NY2d 708, 712-713). (Appeal from Judgment of Supreme Court, Monroe County, Cornelius, J. — Burglary, 3rd Degree.) Present — Green, J. P., Pine, Hayes, Scudder and Burns, JJ.
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 1**  **1 -**  **6 4**  **61**

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , P laintiff

- Appell ee ,
v.
J AMAL MITCHELL, a/k/a Boo , Defendant

– Appell ant
. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eas tern District of Virginia , at Alexandria
. James C. Cacheris , Senior District Judge. ( 1 : 0 2

- c r - 0 0 025

- JCC

- 1 )

Submitted : Jul y 2 8 , 2011 Decided: August 2, 2011

Before SHEDD, AGEE, and DIAZ , Circuit Judges.

Affirm ed by unpublished per curiam opinion
.
Jamal Mitchell , Appellant Pro Se
. Thomas More Hollenhorst , Assistant United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Jamal Mitchell appeals the district court ’s order denying his motion for return of property, pursuant to Fed. R. Crim. P. 41(g). We have reviewed the record and find no abuse of discretion. United States v. Chambers , 192 F.3d 374, 376 (3d Cir. 1999). Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stat ed by the district court. See United States v. Mitchell , No. 1:02

- cr 00025

- JCC

- 1 (E.D. Va. Feb. 7, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
# C_2014289EN.01000501.xml

| 29.8.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 289/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.8.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 289/5

---

Communication from the Commission

on the quantity of certain products in the milk and milk products sector available for the period from 1 October to 31 December 2014 under certain quotas opened by the Union

2014/C 289/04

Import licenses which were allocated for the second half of 2014 for certain quotas referred to in Commission Regulation (EC) No 2535/2001 (1), did not cover the full quantity available under those quotas. The remaining quantities are laid out in the Annex. They will be available from 1 October to 31 December 2014.

1

---

(1)  OJ L 341, 22.12.2001, p. 29.

1

---

ANNEX

| Products originating in New Zealand |
| --- |
| Quota number | Quantity (kilograms) |
| 09.4182 | 29 947 000 |
| 09.4195 | 23 776 000 |
| 09.4514 | 2 928 000 |
| 09.4515 | 1 641 000 |

Products originating in New Zealand

Quota number

Quantity (kilograms)

09.4182

29 947 000

09.4195

23 776 000

09.4514

2 928 000

09.4515

1 641 000

---
#### ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY, a foreign corporation, Appellant, v. Lyda L. MASON, Appellee.

No. 67-101.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Third District.

Aug. 7, 1967.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed.

Appealing after remand Fla.App., 189 So.2d 907.
# C_2012369EN.01000502.xml

| 29.11.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 369/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.11.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 369/5

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.6713 — Tech Data/Specialist Distribution Group/ETC Metrologie/Best'Ware France/SDG BV)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2012/C 369/04

On 24 October 2012, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32012M6713. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32012M6713. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.

---
# lnventoryExpertService A division of the American Chemical Society Phone: B00-631-1884, 614-447-3870 Fax: 614-447-3747 

### E-mail: answers@cas.org 

### Web: WNW. 

### cas. org/products/other-cas- products/client-services/


## June 11, 2015 Colonial Chemical, Incorporated ATTN: Mrs. Kacie E. Howard PO Box 111 225 Colonial Drive South Pittsburg, TN 37380 Dear Mrs. Howard: Thank you for your Inventory Expert Service (IES) order of June 09, 2015. The processing results are attached. To ensure efficient processing of your substance(s), it is important that these results are included with your PMN report for when reporting to the EPA. An invoice will be issued for the cost of the technical processing for your order. Thank you for the opportunity to provide this service. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, Candice Egelhoff CAS Client Services Enclosure(s)

CAS 2540 Olentangy River Road P.O. Box 3343 Columbus, OH 43210-0334 USA

# lnventoryExpertService**--~~---------------** 

### A division of the American Chemical Society Phone: 800-631-1884, 614-447-3870 Fax: 614-447-3747 E-mail: answers@cas.org Web: 

## www. cas. org/products/other-cas- products/client-services/



# INVENTORY EXPERT SERVICE REPORT

IES Order Number: 393499 Registry Number: 690995-44-9 CA Index Name: Quaternary ammonium compounds, (3-chloro-2-hydroxypropyl)coco alkyldimethyl, chlorides

CAS 

## Please print the above CA 

## Index Name on the appropriate page of your PMN.
If this box is checked, CAS has made correction(s) marked in red to your IES order. Please make the same corrections to your PMN before submitting it to the EPA.
2540 Olentangy River Road P.O. Box 3343 Columbus, OH 43210-0334 USA111111111111111 11 11111 1111

# IIII~ NON-CBI SUBMI SS ION PMN2015P4A 

# PMN Pa e 4a For a dass 2 substance· (1) Lis t t he Immed i ate precu rsor subst ances with the i r respective CAS Reg istry N um bers . (2) Describe the nat u r e of the reaction or process . (3) Indicate the range of compositio n an d the typical co mp os ition (w h e re appropriate). e . (1) List the Immediate p recursor subs t a n ce names w ith t heir respect ive CAS Registry Numbers. amlne s, coco alkyl dimeth yl CAS RN 61788-93-0 oxirane, 2-(chloromethy l ) · CAS RN 106-89- 8 Hydroc hloric Acid CAS RN 76474 -01 - 0

En t er Attachment filename for Part I , Section B, 1. e. (1) e . (2) Desc ribe the nature of the reaction or p rocess . coco alkyl dimethy l amine neut ra i l zod with hydrochlo ric acid, t h e n re acted wit

Enter Attachment file n ame fo r e. (3) I nd i cate the r ange of composition an 

## cDr.-r )**lme thy** **iam ine**  64.2 uxirane , 2-(chloromethyl)· 25.7 hydroch l ori c acid 10 . 1

Ente r Attachment nl ena me for Part I , Section B, 1 . e . (3) Con lld ential 

# D



# D

D

EPA FOR M 7710-25 (Rev . 6 -09) Replaces p rev i ous editions of EPA Fo rm 7710-25 Page 5

# ColaCat 86 

# t0<'-0**alkyl** O H

C l
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned certifies
that to the best of his knowledge (1) this Quarterly Report of Corporate Capital Trust, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2016, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(this Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and (2) the information contained in this Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition of the Company as of June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015 and its results of operations for the period ended June 30, 2016.



|                      |  |  |  |  |  |                           |  |                                                                      |  | 
|--------------------- |  |  |  |  |  | ------------------------- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | 
|                      |  |  |  | 
|                      |  |  | 
|Date: August 12, 2016 |  |  |  |  |  | /s/ Thomas K. Sittema    
|                      |  |  |  |  |  |                           |  | Thomas K. Sittema                                                   
|                      |  |  |  |  |  |                           |  | Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)               
|                      |  |  |  | 
|                      |  |  | 
|Date: August 12, 2016 |  |  |  |  |  | /s/ Steven D. Shackelford
|                      |  |  |  |  |  |                           |  | Steven D. Shackelford                                               
|                      |  |  |  |  |  |                           |  | Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
<PAGE>

                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements on Form S-8 (No. 333-46162 and 333-38632) of Moldflow Corporation
of our report dated August 8, 2000, related to the consolidated financial
statements and financial statement schedule of Moldflow Corporation, which is
included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2000.

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

Boston, Massachusetts
September 22, 2000
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 292

To provide for the establishment of a new medical facility for veterans

in south Texas.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JANUARY 5, 1993

Mr. ORTIZ (for himself and Mr. DE LA GARZA) introduced the following bill;

which was referred to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs

A BILL

To provide for the establishment of a new medical facility

for veterans in south Texas.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. NEW VETERANS’ ADMINISTRATION MEDICAL

4 FACILITY IN SOUTH TEXAS.

5 (a) PROJECT AUTHORIZATION.—The Secretary of

6 Veterans Affairs is authorized—

7 (1) to acquire a site in south Texas suitable for

8 a medical facility; and

9 (2) to construct a medical facility on such site.
2

•HR 292 IH

1 (b) FUNDING.—There are authorized to be appro2 priated such sums as may be necessary for the purposes

3 of subsection (a), but the amount appropriated for the

4 construction of the medical facility may not exceed the

5 product of (1) the number of beds to be included in the

6 facility, and (2) $290,000.

7 (c) DEFINITION.—For purposes of this section, the

8 term ‘‘medical facility’’ has the meaning given the term

9 in section 5001(3) of title 38, United States Code.

Æ