alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 24**

**POWER OF ATTORNEY**

KNOWALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS, that each person whose signature appears belowconstitutes and appoints Brady W. Dougan, D. Neil Radey and Andrew M. Hutcher,and each of them severally, his or her true and lawful attorney-in-fact withpower of substitution and resubstitution to sign in his or her name, place andstead, in any and all capacities, to do any and all things and execute any andall instruments that such attorney may deem necessary or advisable under theSecurities Act of 1934 and any rules, regulations and requirements of the U.S.Securities and Exchange Commission in connection with Credit Suisse (USA), Inc.’sAnnual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005and any and all amendments hereto, as fully for all intents and purposes as heor she might or could do in person, and hereby ratifies and confirms all saidattorneys-in-fact and agents, each acting alone, and his or her substitute orsubstitutes, may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.
|                       | **Name** | ** **                                       | ** ** |                     | **Title** | ** ** | ** ** |  | **Date** | ** ** |
|-----------------------|----------|--------------------------------------------------|------------|---------------------|-----------|------------|------------|--|----------|------------|
| /s/ BRADY W.  DOUGAN  |     | Director,  President and Chief Executive Officer |       | March 20, 2006 |
| Brady  W. Dougan      |     | (Principal Executive  Officer)                   |       |                |
| /s/ DAVID C.  FISHER  |     | Chief Financial  and Accounting Officer          |       | March 20, 2006 |
| David  C. Fisher      |     | (Principal Financial and  Accounting Officer)    |       |                |
| /s/ NEIL  MOSKOWITZ   |     | Director                                         |       | March 20, 2006 |
| Neil  Moskowitz       |     |                                             |       |                |
| /s/ LEWIS H.  WIRSHBA |     | Director                                         |       | March 20, 2006 |
| Lewis H. Wirshba      |     |                                             |       |                |

 

----
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 11.2

                       DONALDSON, LUFKIN & JENRETTE, INC.
             SCHEDULE OF COMPUTATION OF WEIGHTED AVERAGE NUMBER OF
             COMMON SHARES AND COMMON SHARE EQUIVALENTS OUTSTANDING
               AND DILUTED EARNINGS PER SHARE FOR THE YEARS ENDED
                        DECEMBER 31, 1998, 1997 AND 1996

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                                   Years Ended December 31,
                                                               1998          1997        1996
                                                               ----          ----        ----
                                                            (in thousands, except per share data)
<S>                                                          <C>          <C>         <C>    
  Weighted Average Common Shares:
      Average Common Shares Outstanding                        119,111      110,278     106,600
      Average Restricted Stock Units Outstanding                 2,497        7,086      10,304
      Average Common Shares Issuable Under
        Employee Benefit Plans                                  10,372        7,660       1,808
      Average Common Shares Issuable for
        Convertible Debt                                             -          474           -
                                                             ---------    ---------   ---------


  Weighted Average Common Shares Outstanding                   131,980      125,498     118,712

  Earnings:
       Net Income                                            $ 370,800    $ 408,250   $ 291,300
       Less:  Preferred Stock Dividend Requirement              21,310       12,144      18,653

      Less: Interest, net of taxes on Convertible Debt               -          308           -
                                                             ---------    ---------   ---------

  Earnings Applicable to Diluted Common Shares               $ 349,490    $ 396,414   $ 272,647
                                                             =========    =========   =========

  Diluted Earnings Per Common Share:                         $    2.65    $    3.16   $    2.30
                                                             =========    =========   =========

</TABLE>
#### E. B. ANDREWS, Appellant, v. CITY OF LAKE BUTLER, a municipal corporation, Appellee.

No. 40566.

Supreme Court of Florida.

July 24, 1972.

Appeal dismissed.
### Summary of State CAIR Allocation Methodologies Are allocations adjusted for fuel type ( including fuel adjustment factors ) ? DC Yes, FIP DE Yes, FIP MD Yes, model rule methodology GA Yes, model rule methodology KY Yes, model rule methodology MS Yes, model rule methodology TN Yes, model rule methodology IN Yes, model rule methodology OH Yes, model rule methodology FL Yes, model rule methodology (plus bonus for biomass – 150%) WV Yes, model rule methodology (no gas units, so they did not include t he gas factor) LA Yes, model rule methodology for utility units IA Yes, model rule
- like (including the fuel adjustment factors), but permanent TX Yes (coal 0.9; nat. gas 0.5; non
-coal non
- nat.gas 0.3) SC Yes (coal 1.0; non
-coal 0.6) MI Yes, for units with permit limits 0.10 #/MMBtu; others: No, heat input IL Yes, output NY No, heat input VA No, heat input AL No, heat input MA No, output WI No, output AR No, output NJ No, output, includes rewards for lower emitting units CT No, output, weighted 120% to pre
- 1990 units in 2009 - 2011 PA No, output, with extra for ARP
-exempt units (waste coal) MO No, table in rule, no formula NC No, table in rule, no formula The model rule methodology included fuel adjustment factors for determining allocations (1.0 for coal, 0.60 for oil, and 0.40 for gas or other fuels). This methodology was also used for allocating under CAIR FIPs. Seventeen states adjusted allocations based on fuel type (13 of those were either FIP allocations or SIP
based alloca tions that used the model allocation methodology or a close variation). Eleven states based allocations on other factors and did not adjust for fuel
-type.
#### Frank L. “Bud” PALMIERI, and Bud Palmieri Real Estate, Inc., a Florida corporation, Petitioners, v. FLORIDA REAL ESTATE COMMISSION, and Upton B. Mackall, Respondents.

No. 70-970.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Dec. 22, 1970.

Certiorari dismissed.
Exhibit 32.1

Certification required by Rule 13a-14(b) or

Rule 15d-14(b) and Section 906 of

the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Dominion Resources Black Warrior Trust (the Trust) on Form 10-K for the period ended
December 31, 2013, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, not in its individual capacity but solely as the trustee of the Trust, certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to its knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Trust.
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|               |  |  |  |                                                                           |  |                                          
|-------------- |  |  |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | -----------------------------------------
|               |  |  |  | BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., TRUSTEE FOR DOMINION RESOURCES BLACK WARRIOR
TRUST
|March 10, 2014 |  |  |  | By:                                                                       |  | /s/ Ron E. Hooper                        
|               |  |  |  |                                                                           |  | Ron E. Hooper,                           
|               |  |  |  |                                                                           |  | Senior Vice President, Royalty Management
|               |  |  |  |                                                                           |  | Bank of America, N.A.                    

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Dominion Resources Black Warrior
Trust and will be retained by Dominion Resources Black Warrior Trust and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<PAGE>
                                       
                 JOHN DEERE CAPITAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
                COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
                             (THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>


                                                         FOR THE YEARS ENDED OCTOBER 31,
                                 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                   1998              1997              1996              1995              1994
                                 --------          --------          --------          --------          --------
<S>                              <C>               <C>               <C>               <C>               <C>
Earnings:
  Income before income
    taxes and changes
    in accounting                $233,534          $211,251          $206,588          $175,360          $161,809
  Fixed charges                   373,236           330,648           276,726           240,913           168,507
                                 --------          --------          --------          --------          --------
    Total earnings               $606,771          $541,899          $483,314          $416,273          $330,316
                                 --------          --------          --------          --------          --------
                                 --------          --------          --------          --------          --------

Fixed charges:
  Interest expense               $368,381          $326,866          $273,748          $238,445          $166,591
  Rent expense                      4,856             3,782             2,978             2,468             1,916
                                 --------          --------          --------          --------          --------
    Total fixed charges          $373,236          $330,648          $276,726          $240,913          $168,507
                                 --------          --------          --------          --------          --------
                                 --------          --------          --------          --------          --------

Ratio of earnings to
  fixed charges *                    1.63              1.64              1.75              1.73              1.96
                                 --------          --------          --------          --------          --------
                                 --------          --------          --------          --------          --------
</TABLE>

-------

"Earnings" consist of income before income taxes, the cumulative effect of 
changes in accounting and fixed charges. "Fixed charges" consist of interest 
on indebtedness, amortization of debt discount and expense, an estimated 
amount of rental expense under capitalized leases which is deemed to be 
representative of the interest factor and rental expense under operating 
leases.

*   The Company has not issued preferred stock. Therefore, the ratios of 
    earnings to combined fixed charges and preferred stock dividends are the 
    same as the ratios presented above.
Exhibit
32.1




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 *




In
connection with the Annual Report of QSGI INC (the "Company") on Form 10-K for
the year ended December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Marc Sherman, Chairman of the
Board and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:




(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Act of 1934; and




(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.




Date:
      March 30, 2009
            
            /s/Marc
      ShermanMarc
      Sherman
              Chairman
      of the Board and Chief Executive
Officer


·
            A
      signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to QSGI INC. and will be
      retained by QSGI INC. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
      Commission or its staff upon
request.







CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 *




In
connection with the Annual Report of QSGI INC. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for
the year ended December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Edward L. Cummings, Chief
Financial Officer and Treasurer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:




(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Act of 1934; and




(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.




Date:
      March 30, 2009
            
            /s/Edward L.
      CummingsEdward
      L. Cummings
              Chief
      Financial Officer and Treasurer


*           A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to QSGI INC. and will be retained
by QSGI INC. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.
# C_2013279EN.01000602.xml

| 27.9.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 279/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.9.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 279/6

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.7025 — Oiltanking/Macquarie/Chemoil Storage)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2013/C 279/03

On 23 September 2013, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32013M7025. EUR-Lex is the online access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32013M7025. EUR-Lex is the online access to the European law.

---
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

JOHN WILLIAM SNYDER,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D19-1277

[October 24, 2019]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.850 motion from the Circuit Court for 

the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, St. Lucie County; Charles A. Schwab, 

Judge; L.T. Case No. 562013CF002636A.

John William Snyder, Bonifay, pro se.

No appearance required for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

TAYLOR, MAY and FORST, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-6555

KEITH SAMPSON, Petitioner - Appellant,

v. GENE M. JOHNSON, Director of the Virginia Department of Corrections, Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Rebecca Beach Smith, District Judge. (2:08-cv-00125-RBS-JEB)

Submitted: July 14, 2009 Decided: July 23, 2009

Before WILKINSON and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Keith Sampson, Appellant Pro Se. Susan Mozley Harris, Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Keith Sampson seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2006) petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2006). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that any assessment of the constitutional claims by the district court is debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by the district

court is likewise debatable. See Miller-El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee , 252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Sampson has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 156 (Monday, August 13, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Page 40086]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-17376]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR


Vacancy Posting for a Member of the Administrative Review Board

    Summary of Duties: A Member of the Administrative Review Board (the 
Board) serves in all matters of the Board as assigned, including policy 
decisions and technology proposals. The incumbent participates in 
rendering decisions of the Board. Each decision is set forth in a 
written opinion which sets forth the basis of the decision. The Member 
of the Board analyzes and evaluates the legal and factual aspects of 
each case and conducts necessary research. Research includes 
examination of laws, regulations, procedures as well as prior Board 
decisions on whistleblower, immigration, child labor, employment 
discrimination, federal construction, and service contract cases made 
under other jurisdiction or general statutory or common law.
    Appointment Type: Excepted--The term of appointment is for two 
years or less and may be extended.
    Qualifications: The applicant should be well versed in law and the 
appeals process, as well as have the ability to interpret regulations 
and to come to a consensus to determine an overall appeals 
determination with Members of board.
    To Be Considered: Applicants must provide a detailed resume 
containing a demonstrated ability to perform as a Member of the Board.
    Closing Date: Resumes must be submitted (postmarked, if sending by 
mail; submitted electronically; or received, if hand-delivered) by 
11:59 p.m. EDT on September 15, 2018. Resumes must be submitted to: 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#e2919b8e948b83cc888d8a8ca2868d8ecc858d94"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="27545e4b514e46094d484f496743484b09404851">[email protected]</span></a> or mail to: U.S. Department of Labor, 200 
Constitution Avenue NW, ATTN: Office of Executive Resources, Room 
N2495, Washington, DC 20210, phone: 774-365-6851. This is not a toll-
free number.

    Dated: August 6, 2018.
Bryan Slater,
Assistant Secretary for Administration & Management.
[FR Doc. 2018-17376 Filed 8-10-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4510-HW-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

**SECTION1350 CERTIFICATION**

In connection with the AnnualReport on Form 10-K/A of Veritas DGC Inc. (the “Company”) for the year endedJuly 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the datehereof (the “Report”), I, Mark E. Baldwin, Chief Financial Officer of theCompany, certify, pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 6 of Title 18 of theUnited States Code, that:

1.               TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934;

2.               The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

November 28, 2006
| /s/ MARK E. BALDWIN     |   |
|-------------------------|--------|
| Mark E. Baldwin         |
| Chief Financial Officer |

 

This certification isfurnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 andshall not be deemed to be a part of the Report or “filed” for any purposewhatsoever.

----