alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2014447EN.01000501.xml

| 13.12.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 447/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.12.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 447/5

---

Adoption of Commission Decision on the transitional national plan communicated by the Portuguese Republic in accordance with Article 32(5) of Directive 2010/75/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council

(2014/C 447/08)

On 11 December 2014, the Commission adopted Decision C(2014) 9360 on the transitional national plan communicated by the Portuguese Republic in accordance with Article 32(5) of Directive 2010/75/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24 November 2010 on industrial emissions (integrated pollution prevention and control) on industrial emissions (1).

1

This document is available on the following internet site: https://circabc.europa.eu/w/browse/36205e98-8e7a-47d7-808d-931bc5baf6ee

---

(1)  OJ L 334, 17.12.2010, p. 17.

1

---
#### ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY v. TOWN OF VILLE PLATTE et al.

No. 53097.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Jan. 25, 1973.

In re: Allstate Insurance Company applying for Certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, Parish of Evangeline. 269 So.2d 298.

Application denied; the result is correct.

BARHAM, J.,

dissents from the refusal. The Court of Appeal errs as a matter of law in the standard for the contributory negligence of plaintiff. Moreover, it errs in pretermitting the negligence of defendants, if negligence is the basis for recovery since that negligence may affect the degree of responsibility of plaintiff. Further, negligence may not be the proper basis for considering recovery. Plaintiff may be responsible under C.C. Art. 2315 for fault not requiring negligence or under contract. Contributory negligence may not be a defense. We must review the entire record to determine these issues.
#### Lorenzo WILLIAMS, Petitioner, v. CARLSON BROTHERS DREDGING; New Amsterdam Casualty Company and the Florida Industrial Commission, Respondents.

No. 36942.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Feb. 21, 1968.

R. K. Roberson of Clayton & Roberson, De Land, for petitioner.

Paul W. Smalbein, Jr., of Howell, Kirby, Montgomery, Sands & D’Aiuto, Daytona Beach, Patrick H. Mears, Tallahassee, and J. Franklin Garner, Lakeland, for respondents.

PER CURIAM.

By petition for a writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission bearing date October 24, 1967.

We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 32 F.S.A.

Our consideration of the petition,, the record and briefs leads us to conclude that there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law.

The petition is therefore denied.

It is further ordered that the petitioner’s petition for allowance of attorneys’ fees, be and the same is hereby denied.

CALDWELL, C. J., and ROBERTS, DREW, THORNAL and ERVIN, JJ., concur.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

KENNETH L. BEAVER,

Appellant

v.

PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF 

CORRECTIONS,

Appellee

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 19 EAP 2019

Appeal from the Commonwealth 

Court Order dated 2/28/19 at 272 

MD 2018

ORDER

PER CURIAM DECIDED: March 26, 2020

AND NOW, this 26th day of March, 2020, the Order of the Commonwealth Court 

is AFFIRMED.
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

    We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in this Registration
Statement on Form S-3 of our report dated November 3, 1999 relating to the
consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedule, which
appears in Semitool, Inc.'s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
September 30, 1999. We also consent to the reference to us under the heading
"Experts" in such Registration Statement.

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Boise, Idaho
September 1, 2000
EXHIBIT 99.1


      CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT
                TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of The Singing Machine Company, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the period ended March 31, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Edward
Steele, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and result of
                  operations of the Company.



Date:     July 16, 2003                  /s/ Edward Steele
                                         -----------------
                                         Edward Steele
                                         Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
                                         (Principal Executive Officer)
Exhibit 32.1





Certification of CEO Pursuant to


18 U.S.C. Section 1350,


As Adopted Pursuant to


Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Zhong Wen International Holding Co., Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Sun Hongyi, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of his knowledge, that:





(1)           The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)           The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





/s/ Sun HongyiChief Executive Officer and Chief Financial OfficerAugust 15, 2011





This certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Zhong Wen International Holding Co., Inc. and will be retained by Zhong Wen International Holding Co., Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

DEANDRE PAYTON JONES, JR.,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 102 WAL 2019

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 17th day of September, 2019

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED

.
# RECEIVED APR302013 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

FEDERAL AVIATIONADMINISTRATION OFFICE OF HEARINGS WASHINGTON, DC 

## HEARINGDOCKET

In theMatter of: FAADOCKET No. FAA-2013-0040 MartinaireAviation LLC FAA CaseNo.2011SW700189 (Civil PenaltyAction) Respondent FDMS No. FAA-2013-0040

JUDGE GOODWIN
AMENDED SECOND NOTICE OF DEPOSITION To: Mr. Michael L. Dworkin, Esquire Michael L. Dworkin andAssociates 465 California Street, Suite 210 San Francisco, California 94104 PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that the Complainant, Federal Aviation Administration will take the oral deposition of the persons specifiedbelow, at the dates, times, and place specified for all purposes permittedby the Rules of Practice, Part 13, Subpart G, of the Federal Aviation Regulations, 14 CFR § 13.220 ( j ) . DEPONENT: Cory Smith, May 15, 2013, 9:00 a.m. Central StandardTime. DEPONENT: Michael Bates, May 16, 2013, 9:00 a.m. Central StandardTime. The undersigned will take the discovery depositions of the above-named deponents before a court reporter in the city of Fort Worth, Texas on the 15ili and 16ili days of May 2013. The depositions will begin at 9:00 a.m. and continue until finished. The depositions will take place at the FederalAviation Administration, SouthwestRegion, Office ofRegional Counsel, 2601 MeachamBlvd., Room 674, FortWorth, Texas 76137. You are required to be present and ready at the dates, time, andplace for oral examination.Respectfully submitted this 29lli day of April 2013.
ERIC E. ANDERSON Regional Counsel Southwest Region

2CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE Re: MartinaireAviation, LLC, FAA CaseNo. 2011SW700189 I hereby certify that on this date, I have sent via Federal Express a true copy of theAmended SecondNotice ofDeposition addressed as follows to: Mr. Michael L. Dworkin andAssociates Law Offices 465 California Street, Suite 210 San Francisco, California 94104-1808 (FAX and Federal Express) Federal AviationAdministration Attn: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2W1000 800 Independence Avenue SW Washington, DC 20591 (Original plus one copy) (Federal Express) The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin Administrative Law Judge Office of Hearings, M-20 Department of Transportation 1200 New JerseyAvenue, S.W. Washington, DC 20590 FAX: 1-202-366-7536 (FAX and Federal Express)
ERIC E. ANDERSON Regional Counsel Southwest Region

s Archier, AgencyAttorney

(817) 222-5074

3 Dated: April 29, 2013
#### Barry SPAHN, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 70-1191.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

June 22, 1971.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
In The

Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana

______________________________

No. 06-08-00018-CR

______________________________

MARLA AMELIA RODRIGUEZ, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

 

On Appeal from the 124th Judicial District Court

 Gregg County, Texas

Trial Court No. 35775-B

 

Before Morriss, C.J., Carter and Moseley, JJ.

Memorandum Opinion by Chief Justice Morriss
See Williamson v. State, 175 S.W.3d 522, 523–24 (Tex. App.—Texarkana 2005, no pet.); 1

Delacruz v. State, 167 S.W.3d 904 (Tex. App.—Texarkana 2005, no pet.)).

2

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Marla Amelia Rodriguez has appealed from her open plea of guilty to the offense of burglary

of a habitation. See TEX. PENAL CODE ANN. § 30.02(c)(2) (Vernon 2003). She was sentenced by

the trial court to five years' confinement.

On appeal, Rodriguez contends her sentence is disproportionate to the crime and violates

societal norms, thus violating the Eighth Amendment, citing Kennedy v. Louisiana, ___ U.S. ___,

128 S.Ct. 2641 (2008). To preserve such complaint for appellate review, Rodriguez must have

presented to the trial court a timely request, objection, or motion that stated the specific grounds for

the desired ruling, or the complaint must be apparent from the context. See TEX. R. APP. P.

33.1(a)(1); Harrison v. State, 187 S.W.3d 429, 433 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005); Williams v.

State, 191 S.W.3d 242, 262 (Tex. App.—Austin 2006, no pet.) (claims of cruel and unusual

punishment must be presented in timely manner); Nicholas v. State, 56 S.W.3d 760, 768 (Tex.

App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 2001, pet. ref'd) (failure to complain to trial court that sentences were

cruel and unusual waived claim of error for appellate review). We have reviewed the record of the

trial proceeding. No relevant request, objection, or motion was made. And, while this Court has

held that a motion for new trial is an appropriate way to preserve this type of claim for review,1

Rodriguez' motion for new trial did not contain an allegation that the sentence was disproportionate

to the offense. She has not preserved such an issue for appeal.
3

Therefore, we affirm the trial court's judgment.

Josh R. Morriss, III

Chief Justice

Date Submitted: August 28, 2008

Date Decided: August 29, 2008

Do Not Publish
Exhibit 32.1

















CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. Section 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In connection with the Quarterly Report of Auscrete Corporation (the “Company’) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2014 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date here of (the “report”), I, John Sprovieri, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1.
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.
The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated this 12th day of August, 2014.








/s/John Sprovieri/s/John SprovieriChief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
<PAGE>


                                                                    Exhibit 23.2

                          INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

         We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration
statements on Form S-8 No's. 333-38521, 333-38523, 333-38525, 333-38527,
333-38531, 333-38533, 333-38537, 333-48167, 333-38539, 333-61395, 333-65688,
333-65704, Form S-4 No's. 333-61401 and 333-47926 and Form S-3 No. 333-64979 of
Security Capital Group of our reports dated January 30, 2001, except as to Note
16, which is as of February 28, 2001, with respect to the balance sheets of
Archstone Communities Trust as of December 31, 2000 and 1999, and the related
statements of earnings, shareholders' equity, and cash flows for each of the
years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2000, and the related
schedule, which reports appear in the December 31, 2001 annual report on Form
10-K of Security Capital Group Incorporated.



                                                        KPMG LLP

Chicago, Illinois
March 28, 2002
<PAGE>

                                                                   Exhibit 23.6

                           CONSENT OF DIRECTOR NOMINEE

        The undersigned hereby consents to serve as a director of Watson
Wyatt & Company Holdings, a Delaware corporation, (the "Company") subject to
his election by the stockholders of the Company and to the inclusion of him
as a nominee for director of the Company in any proxy statement or
registration statement filed and/or distributed by or on behalf of the
Company.

Dated:  September 13, 2000

                                               /s/  J. P. Orbeta
                                               --------------------------
                                               Name:  J. P. Orbeta
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 9
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                       7,833,975
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                            94,000,000
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                232,492,592
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                     379,448,852
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                       376,956,153
<LOANS>                                     43,801,483
<ALLOWANCE>                                     84,114
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             783,212,331
<DEPOSITS>                                 488,661,498
<SHORT-TERM>                               224,626,676
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                         10,540,453
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        64,443
<OTHER-SE>                                  59,319,261
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>             783,212,331
<INTEREST-LOAN>                              1,589,761
<INTEREST-INVEST>                           22,701,659
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                     0
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                            24,291,420
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                           5,565,501
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          11,589,658
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                       12,701,762
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                   49,114
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                             (8,421)
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                             44,806,915
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              8,921,548
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                   8,921,548
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 5,488,552
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.85
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.85
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    3.34
<LOANS-NON>                                          0
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                35,000
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                        0
<RECOVERIES>                                         0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                               84,114
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                                 0
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                         84,114
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>   1
                                                                   EXHIBIT 21


                                                                   

                        SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                                             State or Other
                                                                             Jurisdiction of
                                                                             Incorporation
      Name of Subsidiary                                                     or Organization
      ------------------                                                     ---------------    

<S>                                                                              <C>              <C>
The Elco Corporation                                                              Ohio             (1)

         ELDISC Export Co. (100% owned by The Elco Corporation)                   Delaware         (1)

         Harvel Plastics, Inc. (85% owned by The Elco Corporation)                Pennsylvania     (1)

Seibert-Oxidermo, Inc.                                                            Michigan         (1)

Detrex Industrial Water Treatment                                                 Michigan         (2)

Wayne Chemical Products Company                                                   Michigan         (2)

</TABLE>



(1)      Financial statements of subsidiary company included in the
         Consolidated financial statements.

(2)      Inactive Corporations
## I N T H E C O U R T O F C R I M I N A L A P P E A L S O F T E X A S NO. WR-93,351-01

EX P ARTE ARMAN DO MARTINEZ , Appli cant

ON AP P LICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORP US CAUSE NO. 20160D04459-409-1 IN THE 409TH DIST RICT COURT

F ROM EL P ASO COUNTY

Per curiam . O R D E R Applicant was convicted of attempt to commit murder and sentenc ed to life imprisonment. The Eig hth Court of Appea ls aff irmed his conviction. Martinez v. State , No. 08-19-00046- CR (Tex. App. — El Paso, Fe b. 10, 2021). Applicant filed this application for a writ of habea s corpus in the county of conviction, and the district cler k forwa rded it to this Court. See T E X . C O D E C R I M . P R O C . art. 11.07. Applicant contends that appellate counsel fail ed t o timely inform Applicant that his conviction had been affirmed and advise him of hi s rig ht to file a pro se petition for discretionary revie w. Applicant has alleg ed facts t hat, i f t rue, might entitle him to relief

. Ex parte W

ilson , 956 S.W

. 2 d 25 (Tex. Crim. App. 1997); Ex parte Crow , 180 S.W .3d 135 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005).2

Acc ording ly , the rec ord should be develope d. The trial court is the appropr iate forum for finding s of fac t. T E X . C O D E C R I M . P R O C . art. 11.07, § 3(d). The trial court sha ll order appellate counsel to respond to Applicant’s claim. I n developing the record, the tr ial court may use any means set out in Art i cle 11.07, § 3(d). I f the trial court elec ts to hold a hear ing, it shall deter mine whether Applicant is indige nt. I f Applicant is indige nt and wants to be repr esente d by counsel, the trial court shall appoint counsel to repr esent him at the hear ing. S ee T E X . C O D E C R I M . P R O C . art. 26.04. I f counsel is appointed or reta ined, the trial court shall immediately notify this Court of counsel’s

name. The trial co u rt s h al l make finding s of fac t and conclusions of law as to whether appellate counsel timely informed Applicant that his c onviction ha d been aff irmed and that he had a rig ht to file a pro se petition for discretionar y revie w. The trial court shall also deter mine whether Applicant would have timely filed a petition for discretionar y revie w b u t fo r appellate counsel’s alleg ed defic ient perf

ormanc e. The trial c ourt may make a ny other finding s and conclusions that it de ems appropr iate in re sponse to Applicant’s c laim. The trial court shall make findings of fac t and conclusions of l aw within nin et y day s from the date of this order

. The district cler k shall then immediately forwa rd to this Court the trial court’s finding s and conclusions and the rec ord develope d on rema nd, including, among other things, aff idavits, motions, objections, proposed finding s and conclusions, order s, and transcr ip t s from hear ings and depositions. See T E X . R. A P P . P. 73.4(b)( 4). Any extensions of time must be reque sted by the trial cour

t and obtained f

rom this Court.

Filed: January

12, 2022 Do not publish
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

**(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)**

 

In connection with the filing with the SEC of the Quarterly Report ofNorth American Scientific, Inc. (“Company”) on Form 10-Q/A for the quarterended July 31, 2004 (the “Report”), L. Michael Cutrer, President and ChiefExecutive Officer of the Company and, James W. Klingler, Senior Vice Presidentand Chief Financial Officer of the Company, respectively, do each herebycertify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18U.S.C. Section 1350), that to his knowledge:

 

(1)                           TheReport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

 

(2)                           Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| Date:  March 11, 2005 | By:    | /s/ L. Michael Cutrer                               |   |
|----------------------------|--------|-----------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                       |   | L. Michael Cutrer                                   |   |
|                       |   | President and Chief Executive Officer               |   |
|                       |   |                                                |   |
|                       |   |                                                |   |
| Date:  March 11, 2005 | By:    | /s/ James W. Klingler                               |   |
|                       |   | James W. Klingler                                   |   |
|                       |   | Senior Vice President and 

Chief Financial Officer |   |

 

----