alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                         535,651
<SECURITIES>                                   549,281
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,937,240
<PP&E>                                          64,797
<DEPRECIATION>                                  19,700
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,149,083
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          447,992
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    20,360,346
<OTHER-SE>                                           0 
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,701,091
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,123,195
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             134,381
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (721,552)
<INCOME-TAX>                                    45,500
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (676,052)
<DISCONTINUED>                             (1,317,925)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,993,977)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (.151)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (.151) 
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

                          INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

         We consent to the use in the Post-Effective Amendment No. 1 to the
Registration Statement of HomeSeekers.com, Incorporated on Form S-3 of our
report dated July 22, 1999 and August 4, 1999 on the consolidated balance
sheets of HomeSeekers.com, Incorporated as of June 30, 1999 and 1998, and the
related statements of operations, stockholders' deficit and cash flows for
the years then ended.

         We also consent to the reference to us under the heading "Experts" in
such Registration Statement.


/s/ Albright, Persing & Associates, Ltd.
-----------------------------------------
ALBRIGHT, PERSING & ASSOCIATES, LTD.
Reno, Nevada
August 18, 2000
## MID-MICHIGA N

_;'^'rAnTMENTOr ^ BUSINESSTRWE L^i/^rVvii^^T? ^ 

# COALITIO N OPERAHUI^K >
Februar y6 , 201 2
Docke t Managemen tFacilit y U.S . Departmen to fTransportatio n 120 0 Ne wJerse yAvenu e S E Wes t Buildin g Groun d Floor , Roo m W12-14 0 Washington , D C 2059 0 Re : Su n Countr ySlo tExemptio n - Docke tNumbe rFAA-2012-008 9 Ladie s an d Gentlemen : Su n Countr yAirline s ha s requeste d a n exemptio n fro m th e slo tlimi tfo rRonal d Reaga n Washingto n Nationa l Airpor t(DCA ) se tfort h i n § 93.123(a) , t o permi tth e FAAt o creat e ai rcarrie rslot s durin g certai n limite d hour s fo rSu n Country' s use. . Th e propose d ai rcarrie rslot s woul d replac e tw o slo texemption s under^DO TOrde r2010-12-1 6 awarde d t o Su n Country . O n Januar y6 , 2012 , th e Unite d State s Cour t o f Appeal s fo rth e Distric to fColumbi a Circui tvacate d th e DO TOrder , an d Su n Countr ywil l los e it s existin g servic e betwee n DC Aan d Lansing' s Capita l Regio n Internationa l Airport . Specifically , Su n Countr y desire s on e dail yslo tdurin g oac h o fth e 100 0 an d 110 0 hours . Th e propose d exemptio n woul d permi t Su n Countr yt o continu e operatin g it s existin g service s an d avoi d a n inequitabl e resul to fth e Court' s order . Th e Mid-Michiga n Busines s Trave l Coalitio n represent s mor e tha n 20 0 businesses , educationa l an d governmenta l organization s i n th e Greate rLansin g region,.includin g mos to fth e majo remployer' s i n th e region . Th e Coalition' s missio n is t o suppor tth e developmen to fthe.stronges tpossibl e ai rservic e a t Capita l Regio n Internationa l Airport , a s w e recogniz e th e airpor trepresent s a one.billio n dolla rannua l economi cimpactt o ou rregion . T o tha tend . Washingto n D C i s th e mos timportan tdestinatio n fo rth e Greate rLansin g regiona l busines s comrnunity , an d eliminatio n o fdirec tservic e t o DC Awoul d b e a seriousMos s fo rou rcommunity. " -Th e Su n Country-DCA-servlce-i s essential-to-th e economi cgrov^rt h o fth e Greate rLansing"Region . Th e dail yservic e is th e onl ylarg e aircraf t(737-800 ) sen/Ic e t o Washingto n Reaga n Airport , i n th e stat e o f Michiga n outsid e o fDetroit . Prio rt o Su n Country , th e regiona l communit yhadrequeste d th e introductio n o fthi s servic e fro m numerou s othe rairlin e operator s withou tsuccess . Accordingly , i ti s critica l tha t th e FAAtak e th e necessar ystep s t o ensure " th e continuatio n o fth e Su n Countr yslot s a tth e establishe d fligh ttime s i n suppor to fGreate rLansing' s busines s an d economi cgrovirth . You rimmediat e approva l o fthi s exemptio n s o tha tSu n Countr yca n begi n t o ente rfligh tschedule s fo r sal e fo rth e balanc e o f201 2 wil l b e greatl yappreciated. . Sincerely , . . . . ,
Ros s P. - Woodstock , Administrator Mid-Michiga n Busines s Trave l Coalitio n
EXHIBIT 31.1 / 31.2 CERTIFICATIONS  I,
David Carpenter, certify that:  1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of New Media
Insight Group, Inc. 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other
financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure
controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange
Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have; (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under my supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to me by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; (b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused
such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under my
supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of
financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external
purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles; (c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report my conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and (d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by this
report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and 5. I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internal
control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit
committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the
equivalent functions): (a) All significant deficiencies and material weakness in the design
or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control
over financial reporting. Date:
 December 9, 2010 /s/
David Carpenter David
Carpenter Principal
Executive and Financial Officer
#### Andrew TAYLOR et ux. v. CNA INSURANCE GROUP et al.

No. 54334.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Feb. 1, 1974.

In re: Andrew Taylor and Mary Jane Taylor applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, Parish of East Baton Rouge. 286 So.2d 488.

It is ordered that the writ of review issue; that the Court of Appeal send up the record in duplicate of the case; and that counsel for plaintiff and defendant be notified.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

GEORGE JARVIS AUSTIN,

Plaintiff

- Appellant,

v.
TESLA, INC.; et al.,

Defendants

- Appellees. No. 21

- 15151

D.C. No. 3:20

- cv

- 00800

- EMC

MEMORANDUM *

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California Edward M. Chen, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted June 15, 2022 * *

Before: SILVERMAN, WATFORD, and FORREST, Circuit Judges.

George Jarvis Austin a ppeals pro se from the district court’s judgment

dismissing his action alleging federal and state law violations stemming from his

employment termination

. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We

review de novo a dismissal under Federal Ru le of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). Hebbe

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 

# FILED

JUN 28 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS2 21

- 15151

v. Pliler , 627 F.3d 338, 341 (9th Cir. 2010). We affirm.
The district court properly dismissed Austin’s action because Austin failed

to allege facts sufficient to state a wage theft or retaliation claim under the Fai r

Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”)

. See Landers v. Quality Comm c’ ns, Inc. , 771 F.3d
638, 645 (9th Cir. 2015) (“[A] plaintiff asserting a violation of the FLSA overtime

provisions must allege that she worked more than forty hours in a given workweek

without be ing compensated for the hours worked in excess of forty during that
week”); see also Ashcroft v. Iqbal , 556 U.S. 662, 678 (2009) (“To survive a motion

to dismiss, a complaint must contain sufficient factual matter, accepted as true, to

state a claim to rel ief that is plausible on its face.” (internal quotation marks

omitted)).

The district court did not abuse its discretion in denying Austin leave to

amend because amendment would have been futile. See Cervantes v. Countrywide

Home Loans, Inc. , 656 F.3d 1034, 1041 (9th Cir. 2011) (setting forth standard of

review and stating that leave to amend may be denied where amendment would be

futile); Zucco Partners, LLC v. Digimarc Corp. , 552 F.3d 981, 1007 (9th Cir.
2009) (“[W]here the plaintiff has pr eviously been granted leave to amend and has

subsequently failed to add the requisite particularity to its claims, the district

court ’ s discretion to deny leave to amend is particularly broad.” (internal quotation

marks omitted)).3 21

- 15151

We do not consider matter s not specifically and distinctly raised and argued

in the opening brief, or arguments and allegations raised for the first time on

appeal. See Padgett v. Wright , 587 F.3d 983, 985 n.2 (9th Cir. 2009).

All pending motions and requests are denied.

AFFIRM ED.
### -80 -79 -78 -77 -76 -75
37 38 39 

## ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ 

## ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ 

### 500 1000 1500 100 18 12 06 00 06/19 

## NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL 

# Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 19 Jun 07

EDAS Meteorological DataSource★at 38.86 N 77.06 WMeters AGL 

## ★
■ ■ ■ 

## ★ ■ ■ ■ ■ 

## ★

● ● 

## ★ ● ● ● ●
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                           5,092
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   52,789
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,733
<INVENTORY>                                      4,904
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                73,036
<PP&E>                                         133,677
<DEPRECIATION>                                  39,803
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 178,084
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           39,207
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           120
<OTHER-SE>                                      63,042
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   178,084
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               362,819
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  342,223
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    62
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   880
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               5,542
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 14,236
<INCOME-TAX>                                     6,358
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     7,878
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .65
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .65
        

</TABLE>
United States Environmental Protection Agency

Air Division

Technical Support Document

For The

Ventura County Air Pollution Control District

Rule 2 , Definitions

Prepared by: Cynthia G. Allen

Reviewed by: Andrew Steckel

J anuary 201 2AGENCY: Ventura County Air Pollution Control District

Submittal Date : September 27, 2011

Adoption Date: April 12, 2011

Completeness Date: October 24, 2011

Submitted Rule: Rule 2 , Definitions

Applicable SIP: Submitted on July 20, 2010 ( adopted on January 12, 2010

and approved on March 7, 2011 ) ( 76 FR 12280 )

Background :

The USEPA has recently taken steps to add green house gases (GHGs)

to the list of regulated pollutants. Because the thresholds of significance for

GHGs are substantia lly higher than those for criteria and hazardous pollutants,

EPA is proposing to tailor their regulations to include GHGs. The District has

determined that certain revisions to District Rules and Regulations are required

to implement EPA’s tailoring requi rements.

Summary :

Ventura County Air Pollution Control District ( VCAPCD) Rule 2,

Definitions, is being amended by adding new definitions and revisions to existing

definitions.

New definitions added are Greenhouse Gases (GHGs), Particulate Matter

(PM

- 2 .5 ), Portable, and Stationary.

Revisions to existing definitions are Air Contaminant, Equipment, Motor

Vehicle, and Stationary Source.

EPA Evaluation

The Ventura County APCD does not anticipate any emission changes or

any significant impacts to regula ted sources or the APCD resulting from the

amendments to Rule 2.

There will be no effect on air pollution emissions from Rule 2 since the

changes are mostly administrative.EPA is recommending approval of Ventura County APCD Rule 2 under

section 110(k) as meeting the requirements of section 110(a) and Part D of the

Clean Air Act, as amended in 1990.

Attachments

1. Submitted Rule 2 , Definitions (adopted April 12, 2011 ).

2. SIP Approved Rule 2 (adopted January 12, 2010 ).

3. Strikeo ut/underline version of Rule 2

.
xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?


C\_2014418EN.01002301.xml


| | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 21.11.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 418/23 |

---

Information communicated by Member States regarding State aid granted under Commission Regulation (EC) No 800/2008 declaring certain categories of aid compatible with the common market in application of Articles 87 and 88 of the EC Treaty (General Block Exemption Regulation)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2014/C 418/03

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Aid number | SA.37738 (2013/X) | |
| Member State | United Kingdom | |
| Member State reference number | | |
| Name of the Region (NUTS) | NORTHERN IRELAND Article 107(3)(c) | |
| Granting authority | | | | --- | | Department of Agriculture and Rural Development | | Research Challenge Fund Team | | Department of Agriculture and Rural Development | | Room 359, Dundonald House | | Upper Newtownards Road | | BELFAST BT4 3SB | | http://www.dardni.gov.uk | | |
| Title of the aid measure | Department of Agriculture and Rural Development Research Challenge Fund (Northern Ireland) 2013 — 2016 | |
| National legal basis (Reference to the relevant national official publication) | Section 2(1) of the European Communities Act 1972 Section 7(1)(a) of the Northern Ireland Act 1998 | |
| Type of measure | Scheme | |
| Amendment of an existing aid measure | | |
| Duration | 01.11.2013 — 31.10.2016 | |
| Economic sector(s) concerned | AGRICULTURE; FORESTRY AND FISHING | |
| Type of beneficiary | SME, large enterprise | |
| Annual overall amount of the budget planned under the scheme | GBP 1 (in millions) | |
| For guarantees | GBP 0.00 (in millions) | |
| Aid Instrument (Art. 5) | Direct grant | |
| Reference to the Commission decision | — | |
| If co-financed by Community funds | | |
| Objectives | Maximum aid intensity in % or Maximum aid amount in national currency | SME-bonuses in % |
| Industrial research (Art. 31(2)(b)) | 50 % | |
| Experimental development (Art. 31(2)(c)) | 50 % | |

Web link to the full text of the aid measure:

http://www.dardni.gov.uk/index/education-and-research/dard-research/research-challenge-fund.htm

---
EX-4.4



 Exhibit 4.4 

JOINDER AGREEMENT TO EXCHANGE AND REGISTRATION RIGHTS AGREEMENT 

February 9, 2016 
 Reference is
hereby made to the Exchange and Registration Rights Agreement, dated as of February 9, 2016 (the “Registration Rights Agreement”), by and among EIG INVESTORS CORP. (the “Issuer”), the guarantors listed in Part A of
Schedule II to the Purchase Agreement (as defined in the Registration Rights Agreement) and GOLDMAN, SACHS & CO., CREDIT SUISSE SECURITIES (USA) LLC and JEFFERIES LLC, as the representatives of the several Initial Purchasers. Unless
otherwise defined herein, terms defined in the Registration Rights Agreement and used herein shall have the meanings given to them in the Registration Rights Agreement. 

1. Joinder of the Guarantor. Each other signatory hereto (each, a “Guarantor”), hereby agrees to become bound by
the terms, conditions and other provisions of the Registration Rights Agreement with all attendant rights, duties and obligations stated therein, with the same force and effect as if originally named as “Guarantor” therein and as if such
Guarantor executed the Registration Rights Agreement on the date thereof. 
 2. Governing Law. This Registration Rights Agreement
Joinder, and any claim, controversy or dispute arising under or related to this Registration Rights Agreement Joinder, shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of New York. 

3. Counterparts. This agreement may be executed in any number of counterparts and by the parties hereto in separate counterparts,
each of which when so executed shall be deemed to be an original and all of which taken together shall constitute one and the same agreement. 

4. Amendments. No amendment or waiver of any provision of this Registration Rights Agreement Joinder, nor any consent or approval
to any departure therefrom, shall in any event be effective unless the same shall be in writing and signed by the parties hereto. 
 5.
Headings. The headings in this Registration Rights Agreement Joinder are for convenience of reference only and shall not limit or otherwise affect the meaning hereof. 

[Signature Page Follows] 







 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Agreement as of the date first written above.

  

					
	 CONSTANT CONTACT, INC.
 CARDSTAR,
INC.
 SINGLEPLATFORM, LLC

		
	By:	 	 /s/ Hari Ravichandran

		 	Name:	 	Hari Ravichandran
		 	Title:	 	Chief Executive Officer and President
	
	CARDSTAR PUBLISHING, LLC
	By:	 	CARDSTAR, INC., its sole member
		
	By:	 	 /s/ Hari Ravichandran

		 	Name:	 	Hari Ravichandran
		 	Title:	 	Chief Executive Officer and President


 [Signature Page to Registration Rights Agreement Joinder]
EXHIBIT 32.2

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of The Singing Machine Company, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the year ended March 31, 2006 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Danny
Zheng, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to The Singing Machine Company, Inc. and will be retained by The
Singing Machine Company, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.

                                        /S/ Danny Zheng
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Danny Zheng
                                        Chief Financial Officer
                                        (Principal Financial Officer)

                                        Date: July 14, 2006