alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31-13
**FORM 10-K CERTIFICATION**
I, Anthony F. Earley, Jr., certify that:
1.  I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of The Detroit Edison Company; 2.  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; 3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport; 4.  The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 a.  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, ismade known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this report is being prepared;  b.  (Intentionally omitted)  c.  Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and proceduresand presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based onsuch evaluation; and  d.  Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter(the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and
5.  The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):
 a.  All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operationof internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and  b.  Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employeeswho have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.   /s/ ANTHONY F. EARLEY, JR. Date: March 15, 2005   Anthony F. Earley, Jr.
<PAGE>



                                  EXHIBIT 23.1

               Consent of Ernst & Young LLP, Independent Auditors

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on
Form S-8 pertaining to the Supplemental Stock Option/Stock Issuance Plan of
Ultratech Stepper, Inc of our report dated January 25, 2000 with respect to the
consolidated financial statements of Ultratech Stepper, Inc. incorporated by
reference in its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
1999, and the related financial statement schedule included therein, filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission.



/s/ Ernst & Young LLP

ERNST & YOUNG LLP

San Jose, California
August 11, 2000
#### Inger ROGERS, Appellant, v. FIRST NATIONAL BANK AT WINTER PARK, a national banking association, Frank P. Glackin, Jr., James S. Fortiner and John Bartz, Appellees.

No. 1158.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Fourth District.

Feb. 1, 1967.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Orange County; Roger A. Barker, Judge.

Appeal dismissed.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Paul Campbell, Appellant.

[737 NYS2d 73]

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Michael Corriero, J.), entered June 29, 1999, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of burglary in the third degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to a term of 2V2 to 5 years, unanimously affirmed.

The verdict was based upon legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence. Evidence establishing that defendant entered a youth center by taking advantage of the fact that workers propped open a door that normally was kept locked, requiring admittance by buzzer, and that while inside defendant stole a stereo, hid in a darkened meter room and falsely claimed to be part of the cleaning crew, warranted the inference that he entered the building with intent to steal and with knowledge that he had no license or privilege to enter *(see, People v Castillo,*47 NY2d 270, 278; *People v White,*250 AD2d 500, *lv denied*92 NY2d 952). Concur — Nardelli, J.P., Andrias, Saxe, Ellerin and Marlow, JJ.
#### Adler LEDOUX v. Robert L. WATERBURY et al.

No. 53943.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Sept. 26, 1973.

In re: Robert L. Waterbury, Gladys Pitre Boagni and Dolores W. Danner applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, Parish of St. Landry, 280 So.2d 871.

It is ordered that the writ of review issue; that the Court ,of Appeal send up the record in duplicate of the case; and that counsel for plaintiff and defendant be notified.
No. 00-7355.

#### Thomas *v.*Halter, Acting Commissioner of Social Security.

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.
<PAGE>   1


                                                                    EXHIBIT 12-9

                           THE DETROIT EDISON COMPANY
                COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                                           Year Ended December 31
                                                          ------------------------------------------------------

                                                                1997                1996                1995
                                                                ----                ----                ----

                                                                       (Millions, except for ratio)

<S>                                                       <C>                <C>                 <C>            
Net income.............................................   $           417    $            328    $           434
                                                          ---------------    ----------------    ---------------

Taxes based on income:
   Current income taxes................................               308                 224                221
   Deferred taxes - net................................                (6)                 16                 79
   Investment tax credit adjustments - net.............               (14)                (15)               (17)
   Municipal and state.................................                 4                   3                  3
                                                          ---------------    ----------------    ---------------
     Total taxes based on income.......................               292                 228                286
                                                          ---------------    ----------------    ---------------

Fixed charges:
   Interest on long-term debt..........................               262                 275                275
   Amortization of debt discount, premium
     and expense.......................................                11                  12                 11
   Other interest......................................                 9                   4                 10
   Interest factor of rents............................                34                  34                 29
                                                          ---------------    ----------------    ---------------
     Total fixed charges...............................               316                 325                325
                                                          ---------------    ----------------    ---------------

Earnings before taxes based on income
   and fixed charges...................................   $         1,025    $            881    $         1,045
                                                          ===============    ================    ===============

Ratio of earnings to fixed charges.....................              3.24                2.71               3.21
</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3356 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3356

  To designate the United States courthouse under construction at 611 
 Broad Street, in Lake Charles, Louisiana, as the ``Edwin Ford Hunter, 
                    Jr., United States Courthouse''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 26, 1993

  Mr. Hayes introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
              Committee on Public Works and Transportation

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To designate the United States courthouse under construction at 611 
 Broad Street, in Lake Charles, Louisiana, as the ``Edwin Ford Hunter, 
                    Jr., United States Courthouse''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The United States courthouse under construction at 611 Broad 
Street, in Lake Charles, Louisiana, shall be known and designated as 
the ``Edwin Ford Hunter, Jr., United States Courthouse''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the courthouse referred to in section 1 
shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Edwin Ford Hunter, Jr., 
United States Courthouse''.

                                 <all>
```
#### Johnny Lee COATES, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 72-817.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Feb. 15, 1973.

Appeal dismissed.
# C_2014028EN.01001001.xml

| 31.1.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 28/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

31.1.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 28/10

---

Notice from the French authorities to the European Commission pursuant to Article 9 of Council Directive 2009/119/EC imposing an obligation on Member States to maintain minimum stocks of crude oil and/or petroleum products

2014/C 28/08

In accordance with Article 9(4) of Council Directive 2009/119/EC of 14 September 2009 imposing an obligation on Member States to maintain minimum stocks of crude oil and/or petroleum products, the French authorities are pleased to provide the Commission with the following information.

| 1. | The level of specific stocks the French authorities undertake to maintain is equivalent to 30 days of average daily consumption. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The level of specific stocks the French authorities undertake to maintain is equivalent to 30 days of average daily consumption.

| 2. | This commitment applies to the period from 1 February 2014 to 31 January 2015. |
| --- | --- |

2.

This commitment applies to the period from 1 February 2014 to 31 January 2015.

| 3. | The specific stocks will be composed of the following product categories:






  — | motor gasoline, |
| --- | --- | --- |

3.

The specific stocks will be composed of the following product categories:

—

motor gasoline,

| — | kerosene-type jet fuel, and |
| --- | --- |

—

kerosene-type jet fuel, and

| — | gas/diesel oil (distillate fuel oil). |
| --- | --- |

—

gas/diesel oil (distillate fuel oil).

---
#### Irwin RAY, Appellant, v. Rita Greenwood BRANTMAN, f/k/a Rita Greenwood, Appellee.

No. 70-648.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

March 2, 1971.

Rehearing Denied April 30, 1971.

Shalle Stephen Fine, Miami, for appellant.

Richard L. Lapidus, Miami, for appel-lee.

Before BARKDULL, HENDRY and SWANN, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. Compare Boymer v. Birmelin, Fla.App. 1969, 227 So.2d 358.
EXHIBIT 32.1





CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER





PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)





In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2019 (the “Report”) of New Mountain Finance Corporation (the “Registrant”), as filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Robert A. Hamwee, the Chief Executive Officer of the Registrant, hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge, that:





|    |                                                                                                                                  
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

|    |                                                                                                                                                        
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.




/s/ ROBERT A. HAMWEEName:Robert A. HamweeDate:November 6, 2019
#### HOMESTEAD GAS COMPANY and Hartford Accident *&*Indemnity Company, Petitioners, Cross-Respondents, v. William Frank LONES and the Industrial Relations Commission, Respondents, Cross-Petitioner.

No. 42491.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Oct. 18, 1972.

Certiorari denied.

ROBERTS, C. J., and ERVIN, BOYD, McCAIN and DEKLE, JJ., concur.
## I N T H E C O U R T O F C R I M I N A L A P P E A L S O F T E X A S NOS. WR-84,278-01 & 84,278- 02

EX P ARTE MARCU S PU RNELL WIL HITE , Appli cant

ON AP P LICATIONS FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS CAUSE NOS. 1141857-A & 1178148-A IN THE 208T H DISTRICT COURT F ROM HARRIS COUNTY

Per curiam . A L C A L A , J., fi led a con cu rring opin ion in wh ich J O H N S O N , J., joined. Y E A R Y , J., fi led a concurring opin ion in wh ich K E A S L E R and H E R V E Y , JJ., joined.

O R D E R P u rs u an t to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedur e, t h e cler k of t he trial court transmitt ed to this Court these appl i cations for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte Y oung , 418 S.W .2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of two counts of ag g ravated robber

y and sentenc ed to fiftee n y ear s’ imprisonment on eac h count. The Four teenth Court of Appea ls aff

irmed his convictions. W

ilhite v. State , Nos. 14-09-00913- CR & 14-09-00918- CR (Tex. App.—Houston [ 14th Dist.] J uly 29, 2010) (not desig nated f or publication). Applicant contends, among othe r thing s, that trial counsel rende red ineffe ctive assistance

. Wit hout making cre dibilit y finding s or other specific finding s of fac t in respo n s e to Applicant’s2

ineffe ctive as s istance of trial counsel claim, the trial court conclude d that Applicant’s pleas wer e voluntary and that App l i ca nt had not demonstrated that counsel was ineffe ctive. The trial court

rec ommended that we deny relief

. We believe that the trial court’s finding s of fac t and conclusions of law a re not suff

icient to resolve A

pplicant’s cla ims. I f t he trial court elects t o hold a hearing , it shall deter mine whether Applicant i s indige nt. I f Applicant is indige nt and wishes to be repr es en t ed by counsel, the trial court shall appoint an attorney to repre sent him at the hea ring . T E X . C O D E C R I M . P R O C . art. 26.04. T h e t ri al court shall make further finding s of fac t and conclusions of law as to wheth er counsel’s conduct was defic ient and her defic ient conduct prejudice d Applicant. The trial court shall also make a

ny other finding s of fac t a

nd conclusions of law tha t it deems releva nt and appr opriate to the dispositi on of Applica nt’s claims for ha

beas c orpus re lief. This application will be held in abey ance until the trial court has resolved the fac t issues. The issues shall be resolved wi t h i n 9 0 d ay s of this order

. A supplemental transcr ipt containing all aff idavits and int err og atories or the t ransc ription of t he court repor ter’s notes from any hear ing or deposition, along with the trial court’ s supplemental finding s of fa ct and c onclusions of law, shall be forwar ded to this Court within 120 day s of the date of this order. A ny extensions of time shall be obtained f

rom this Court.

Filed: June 15, 2016 Do not publish
**EXHIBIT 23.1**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENTAUDITORS**

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (File No. 33-91238, File No. 33-94878, File No. 33-99728 and File No.333-37795) of U.S. Xpress Enterprises, Inc. and subsidiaries of our report dated January 29, 2003, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of US Xpress Enterprises, Inc. and subsidiaries included in this Form 10-K for the year endedDecember 31, 2002.

Our audit also included financial statement Schedule II for the year ended December 31, 2002 of the US Xpress Enterprises, Inc. and subsidiaries listed inItem 15(a). This schedule is the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion based on our audit. In our opinion, the financial schedule referred to above, when considered in relation to the basic financialstatements taken as a whole, presents fairly in all material respects the information set forth therein. Financial Statement Schedule II for the years ended December 31, 2000 and 2001 listed in Item 15(a) was audited by other auditors who haveceased operations and whose report dated January 29, 2002 expressed an unqualified opinion on the Schedule. 

**/s/ Ernst & Young LLP                       **

----

Chattanooga, TennesseeMarch 26, 2003
# C_2013354EN.01001101.xml

| 4.12.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 354/11 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.12.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 354/11

---

Interest rate applied by the European Central Bank to its main refinancing operations (1):

1

0,25 % on 1 December 2013

Euro exchange rates (2)

2

3 December 2013

2013/C 354/07

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,3578 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 139,31 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4594 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,82710 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 8,8677 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,2287 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,2900 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 27,468 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 302,90 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,7028 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,2032 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,4617 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,7675 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,4873 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4465 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 10,5262 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,6457 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,7023 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 440,34 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 14,0306 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 8,2717 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,6358 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 15 945,05 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,3667 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 59,403 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 45,1500 |
| THB | Thai baht | 43,695 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 3,1951 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 17,9796 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 84,6690 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,3578

JPY

Japanese yen

139,31

DKK

Danish krone

7,4594

GBP

Pound sterling

0,82710

SEK

Swedish krona

8,8677

CHF

Swiss franc

1,2287

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,2900

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

27,468

HUF

Hungarian forint

302,90

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,7028

PLN

Polish zloty

4,2032

RON

Romanian leu

4,4617

TRY

Turkish lira

2,7675

AUD

Australian dollar

1,4873

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4465

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

10,5262

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,6457

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,7023

KRW

South Korean won

1 440,34

ZAR

South African rand

14,0306

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

8,2717

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,6358

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

15 945,05

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,3667

PHP

Philippine peso

59,403

RUB

Russian rouble

45,1500

THB

Thai baht

43,695

BRL

Brazilian real

3,1951

MXN

Mexican peso

17,9796

INR

Indian rupee

84,6690

---

(1)  Rate applied to the most recent operation carried out before the indicated day. In the case of a variable rate tender, the interest rate is the marginal rate.

1

(2)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

2

Source:

---
_______________________________________ __ ___________________ ________________ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

January 30, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh
Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly 131463(59) Maura D. Corrigan Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman,
Justices DETROIT FIREFIGHTERS ASSOCIATION, I.A.F.F. LOCAL 344, Plaintiff-Appellee, SC: 131463 v COA: 266654 Wayne CC: 05-526691-CL CITY OF DETROIT, Defendant-Appellant.

On order of the Chief Jus tice, the motion by the defend ant-appellant for extension of the time for filing their brief and appendi x is considered, and it appearing the filing was completed on January 23, 2007, the tim e for filing is extended to that date.

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

January 30, 2007

Clerk
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D2023

- 0324

_____________________________

B RANDI L UCAS B USE ,
Appellant,

v.

S TATE OF F LORIDA ,
Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Escambia County

. Jennie Kinsey , Judge

.

March 13, 2024

P ER C URIAM

.

A FFIRMED

. See Parks v. State , 371 So. 3d 392 (Fla. 1st DCA 2023).

O STERHAUS , C.J., and R AY and M.K. T HOMAS , JJ., concur

.

_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________2 Jessica J. Yeary , Public Defender, and Lori A. Willner

, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Heather Flanagan Ross, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee

, for Appellee.
EXHIBIT 32.2

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                                   PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Anthony R. Turnbull, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge,
I-Web Media, Inc.'s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended
June 30, 2010 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the
financial condition and results of operations of I-Web Media, Inc.


Date: 9/9/10                               By: /s/ Anthony R. Turnbull
                                              ----------------------------------
                                           Name:  Anthony R. Turnbull
                                           Title: Chief Financial Officer