Skin Notation (SK) Profile

Pentachlorophenol (PCP)

[CAS No. 87-86-5]

Department of Health and Human Services

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health 
ii

This information is distributed solely for the purpose of pre-dissemination peer review under applicable 

information quality guidelines. It has not been formally disseminated by the National Institute for 

Occupational Safety and Health. It does not represent and should not be construed to represent any 

agency determination or policy.

Disclaimer

Mention of any company or product does not constitute endorsement by the National Institute for 

Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH). In addition, citations to Web sites external to NIOSH 

do not constitute NIOSH endorsement of the sponsoring organizations or their programs or 

products. Furthermore, NIOSH is not responsible for the content of these Web sites. 

Ordering Information

To receive this document or information about other occupational safety and health topics, 

contact NIOSH: 

Telephone: 1-800-CDC-INFO (1-800-232-4636)

TTY: 1-888-232-6348

E-mail: cdcinfo@cdc.gov

Or visit the NIOSH Web site: www.cdc.gov/niosh

For a monthly update on news at NIOSH, subscribe to NIOSH eNews by visiting 

www.cdc.gov/niosh/eNews.

Suggested Citation

NIOSH [20XX]. NIOSH skin notation profile: Pentachlorophenol (PCP). By Hudson NL, 

Dotson GS. Cincinnati, OH: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for 

Disease Control and Prevention, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, DHHS 

(NIOSH) Publication No. XXX

DHHS (NIOSH) Publication No. XXX
iii

This information is distributed solely for the purpose of pre-dissemination peer review under applicable 

information quality guidelines. It has not been formally disseminated by the National Institute for 

Occupational Safety and Health. It does not represent and should not be construed to represent any 

agency determination or policy.

Foreword

As the largest organ of the body, the skin performs multiple critical functions, such as serving as 

the primary barrier to the external environment. For this reason, the skin is often exposed to 

potentially hazardous agents, including chemicals, which may contribute to the onset of a 

spectrum of adverse health effects ranging from localized damage (e.g., irritant contact 

dermatitis and corrosion) to induction of immune-mediated responses (e.g., allergic contact 

dermatitis and pulmonary responses), or systemic toxicity (e.g., neurotoxicity and hepatoxicity). 

Understanding the hazards related to skin contact with chemicals is a critical component of 

modern occupational safety and health programs. 

In 2009, the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) published Current 

Intelligence Bulletin (CIB) 61 – A Strategy for Assigning New NIOSH Skin Notations [NIOSH 

2009-147]. This document provides the scientific rationale and framework for the assignment of 

multiple hazard-specific skin notations (SK) that clearly distinguish between the systemic 

effects, direct (localized) effects, and immune-mediated responses caused by skin contact with 

chemicals. The key step within assignment of the hazard-specific SK is the determination of the 

hazard potential of the substance, or its potential for causing adverse health effects as a result of 

skin exposure. This determination entails a health hazard identification process that involves use 

of the following:

 Scientific data on the physicochemical properties of a chemical

 Data on human exposures and health effects

 Empirical data from in vivo and in vitro laboratory testing

 Computational techniques, including predictive algorithms and mathematical models that 

describe a selected process (e.g., skin permeation) by means of analytical or numerical 

methods. 

This Skin Notation Profile provides the SK assignments and supportive data for 

pentachlorophenol (PCP). In particular, this document evaluates and summarizes the literature 

describing the hazard potential of the substance and its assessment according to the scientific 

rationale and framework outlined in CIB 61. In meeting this objective, this Skin Notation Profile

intends to inform the audience—mostly occupational health practitioners, researchers, policyand decision-makers, employers, and workers in potentially hazardous workplaces—so that 

improved risk-management practices may be developed to better protect workers from the risks 

of skin contact with the chemicals of interest.

John Howard, M.D.

Director

National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
iv

This information is distributed solely for the purpose of pre-dissemination peer review under applicable 

information quality guidelines. It has not been formally disseminated by the National Institute for 

Occupational Safety and Health. It does not represent and should not be construed to represent any 

agency determination or policy.

Contents

FOREWORD ............................................................................................................................................................III

ABBREVIATIONS.....................................................................................................................................................V

GLOSSARY .............................................................................................................................................................VII

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS..................................................................................................................................... VIII

1.0 INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................................................1

1.1 GENERAL SUBSTANCE INFORMATION:.................................................................................................................1

1.2 PURPOSE..............................................................................................................................................................1

1.3 OVERVIEW OF SK ASSIGNMENT ..........................................................................................................................1

2.0 SYSTEMIC TOXICITY FROM SKIN EXPOSURE (SK: SYS) ......................................................................2

3.0 DIRECT EFFECTS ON SKIN (SK: DIR)...........................................................................................................5

4.0 IMMUNE-MEDIATED RESPONSES (SK: SEN) .............................................................................................6

5.0 SUMMARY............................................................................................................................................................6

REFERENCES ............................................................................................................................................................8

APPENDIX: CALCULATION OF THE SI RATIO FOR PCP............................................................................12

OVERVIEW...............................................................................................................................................................12

CALCULATION .........................................................................................................................................................14

APPENDIX REFERENCES...........................................................................................................................................15
v

This information is distributed solely for the purpose of pre-dissemination peer review under applicable 

information quality guidelines. It has not been formally disseminated by the National Institute for 

Occupational Safety and Health. It does not represent and should not be construed to represent any 

agency determination or policy.

Abbreviations

ACGIH American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists 

CIB Current Intelligence Bulletin

cm2squared centimeter(s)

cm/hour centimeter(s) per hour

DEREK Deductive Estimation of Risk from Existing Knowledge

DIR skin notation indicating the potential for direct effects to the skin following 

contact with a chemical

DMBA dimethylbenzanthracene 

EC European Commission 

GHS Globally Harmonized System for Classification and Labelling of Chemicals

IARC International Agency for Research on Cancer

(IRR) subnotation of SK: DIR indicating the potential for a chemical to be a skin irritant 

following exposure to the skin

kaq coefficient in the watery epidermal layer

kp skin permeation coefficient 

kpol coefficient in the protein fraction of the stratum corneum

kpsc permeation coefficient in the lipid fraction of the stratum corneum 

LD50 dose resulting in 50% mortality in the exposed population

LDLo dermal lethal dose

LOAEL lowest-observed-adverse-effect level 

log KOW base-10 logarithm of a substance’s octanol–water partition

M molarity

m

3

cubic meter(s)

mg milligram(s)

mg/kg milligram(s) per kilogram body weight

mg/m3 milligram(s) per cubic meter

mL milliliter(s)

MW molecular weight

NIOSH National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health

NOAEL no-observed-adverse-effect level

NTP National Toxicology Program

OEL occupational exposure limit

OSHA Occupational Safety and Health Administration

PCP pentachlorophenol

REL recommended exposure limit

RF retention factor 

SEN skin notation indicating the potential for immune-mediated reactions following 

exposure of the skin

SI ratio ratio of skin dose to inhalation dose

SK skin notation
vi

This information is distributed solely for the purpose of pre-dissemination peer review under applicable 

information quality guidelines. It has not been formally disseminated by the National Institute for 

Occupational Safety and Health. It does not represent and should not be construed to represent any 

agency determination or policy.

SW solubility in water

SYS skin notation indicating the potential for systemic toxicity following exposure of 

the skin

TPA 12-O-tetradecanoylphorbol-13-acetate

USEPA United States Environmental Protection Agency 

μg microgram(s)

μg/cm2 microgram(s) per square centimeter 

μg/cm2/hour microgram(s) per square centimeter per hour 

μL microliter(s) 
vii

This information is distributed solely for the purpose of pre-dissemination peer review under applicable 

information quality guidelines. It has not been formally disseminated by the National Institute for 

Occupational Safety and Health. It does not represent and should not be construed to represent any 

agency determination or policy.

Glossary 

Absorption—The transport of a chemical from the outer surface of the skin into both the skin 

and systemic circulation (including penetration, permeation, and resorption). 

Acute exposure—Contact with a chemical that occurs once or for only a short period of time. 

Cancer—Any one of a group of diseases that occurs when cells in the body become abnormal 

and grow or multiply out of control. 

Contaminant—A chemical that is (1) unintentionally present within a neat substance or mixture 

at a concentration less than 1.0% or (2) recognized as a potential carcinogen and present within a 

neat substance or mixture at a concentration less than 0.1%. 

Cutaneous (or percutaneous)—Referring to the skin (or through the skin). 

Dermal—Referring to the skin. 

Dermal contact—Contact with (touching) the skin. 

Direct effects—Localized, non-immune-mediated adverse health effects on the skin, including 

corrosion, primary irritation, changes in skin pigmentation, and reduction/disruption of the skin 

barrier integrity, occurring at or near the point of contact with chemicals. 

Immune-mediated responses—Responses mediated by the immune system, including allergic 

responses. 

Sensitization—A specific immune-mediated response that develops following exposure to a 

chemical, which, upon re-exposure, can lead to allergic contact dermatitis (ACD) or other 

immune-mediated diseases such as asthma, depending on the site and route of re-exposure. 

Substance—A chemical. 

Systemic effects—Systemic toxicity associated with skin absorption of chemicals after exposure 

of the skin.
viii

This information is distributed solely for the purpose of pre-dissemination peer review under applicable 

information quality guidelines. It has not been formally disseminated by the National Institute for 

Occupational Safety and Health. It does not represent and should not be construed to represent any 

agency determination or policy.

Acknowledgments

This document was developed by the Education and Information Division (Paul Schulte, Ph.D., 

Director). G. Scott Dotson, Ph.D., was the project officer for this document, assisted in great part 

by Naomi Hudson, Dr.P.H., MPH, Todd Niemeier, M.Sc., and Sudha Pandalai, M.D., Ph.D. The 

basis for this document was a report (Toxicology Excellence for Risk Assessment [TERA]) 

contracted by NIOSH and prepared by Bernard Gadagbui, Ph.D., and Andrew Maier, Ph.D. 

For their contribution to the technical content and review of this document, special 

acknowledgment is given to the following NIOSH personnel:

Denver Field Office

Eric Esswein, M.Sc.

Division of Applied Research and Technology 

Clayton B’Hymer, Ph.D. 

John Snawder, Ph.D.

Mark Toraason, Ph.D.

Division of Respiratory Disease Studies 

Gregory A. Day, Ph.D. 

Aleksander Stefaniak, Ph.D. 

Division of Surveillance, Hazard Evaluations, and Field Studies

Matt Dahm, M.Sc. 

Aaron Sussell, Ph.D. 

Loren Tapp, M.D. 

Education and Information Division

Devin Baker, M.Ed.

Charles L. Geraci, Ph.D.

Thomas J. Lentz, Ph.D.

Richard Niemeier, Ph.D.

Sudha Pandalai, M.D., Ph.D.

Health Effects Laboratory Division

Stacey Anderson, Ph.D. 

H. Fredrick Frasch, Ph.D. 

Vic Johnson, Ph.D.

Michael Luster, Ph.D. 

Paul Siegel, Ph.D.

Berran Yucesoy, Ph.D. 
ix

This information is distributed solely for the purpose of pre-dissemination peer review under applicable 

information quality guidelines. It has not been formally disseminated by the National Institute for 

Occupational Safety and Health. It does not represent and should not be construed to represent any 

agency determination or policy.

National Personal Protection Technology Laboratory

Heinz Ahlers, M.Sc.

Angie Shepherd

For their contribution to the technical content and review of this document, special 

acknowledgment is given to the following CDC personnel:

Office of Surveillance, Epidemiology and Laboratory Services/Epidemiology and Analysis 

Program Office 

Barbara Landreth, M.A.

In addition, special appreciation is expressed to the following individuals for serving as 

independent, external reviewers and providing comments that contributed to the development or 

improvement of this document:

 G. Frank Gerberick, Ph.D., The Procter and Gamble Company, Cincinnati, OH

 Dori Germolec, Ph.D., National Toxicology Program, National Institute for 

Environmental Health Sciences, Research Triangle, NC

 Ben Hayes, M.D., Ph.D., Division of Dermatology, Vanderbilt School of Medicine, 

Nashville, TN 

 Jennifer Sahmel, M.Sc., CIH, ChemRisk, Boulder, CO

 James Taylor, M.D., Industrial Dermatology, The Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH
1

This information is distributed solely for the purpose of pre-dissemination peer review under applicable 

information quality guidelines. It has not been formally disseminated by the National Institute for Occupational 

Safety and Health. It does not represent and should not be construed to represent any agency determination or 

policy.

1.0 Introduction 

1.1 General Substance Information: 

Chemical: Pentachlorophenol (PCP)

CAS No: 87-86-5

Molecular weight (MW): 266.4

Molecular formula: C6Cl5OH

Structural formula:

Synonyms: PCP, Penta; 2,3,4,5,6-Pentachlorophenol

Uses: PCP has historically been one of the most widely used biocides in the United States [ATSDR 

2001]. Its primary application has been as a wood preservative. 

1.2 Purpose 

This skin notation profile presents (1) a brief summary of epidemiological and toxicological data 

associated with skin contact with PCP and (2) the rationale behind the hazard-specific skin notation 

(SK) assignment for PCP. The SK assignment is based on the scientific rationale and logic outlined in 

the Current Intelligence Bulletin (CIB) 61: A Strategy for Assigning New NIOSH Skin Notations

[NIOSH 2009]. The summarized information and health hazard assessment are limited to an evaluation 

of the potential health effects of dermal exposure to PCP. A literature search was conducted through 

February 2013 to identify information on PCP, including but not limited to data relating to its 

toxicokinetics, acute toxicity, repeated-dose systemic toxicity, carcinogenicity, biological 

system/function–specific effects (including reproductive and developmental effects and 

immunotoxicity), irritation, and sensitization. Information was considered from studies of humans, 

animals, or appropriate modeling systems that are relevant to assessing the effects of dermal exposure to 

PCP. 

1.3 Overview of SK Assignment

PCP is potentially capable of causing numerous adverse health effects following skin contact. A critical 

review of available data has resulted in the following SK assignment for PCP: SK: SYS (FATAL)-DIR 

(IRR). Table 1 provides an overview of the critical effects and data used to develop the SK assignment 

for PCP. 
2

This information is distributed solely for the purpose of pre-dissemination peer review under applicable 

information quality guidelines. It has not been formally disseminated by the National Institute for Occupational 

Safety and Health. It does not represent and should not be construed to represent any agency determination or 

policy.

Table 1. Summary of the SK Assignment for PCP

Skin Notation Critical Effect Available Data

SK: SYS (FATAL) Immunotoxicity;

CNS effects (weight loss, profuse 

sweating); fever

Limited human and animal 

data

SK: DIR (IRR) Skin irritation; tumor promoter Sufficient animal data

2.0 Systemic Toxicity from Skin Exposure (SK: SYS)

Toxicokinetic studies following dermal exposure to PCP were identified. Two epidemiological studies 

(a cohort study and a case series) were identified [Begley et al. 1977; Jones et al. 1986] that measured 

the amount of PCP in the plasma and urine in occupationally exposed workers, and provided evidence of 

absorption of PCP. In the cohort study, the blood concentrations of workers exposed to PCP (1.3 

micrograms per 100 millilitres [μg/100mL]) were significantly higher than the mean of the unexposed 

workers (0.26 μg/100mL) [Jones et al. 1986]. Begley et al. [1977] reported PCP concentrations in the 

blood averaging 5.1 parts per million (ppm) in 18 volunteers at a wood treatment plant. However, in 

both of these studies [Begley et al. 1977; Jones et al. 1986], the contribution of dermal exposure to the 

total exposure was not quantified. Kehoe et al. [1939] reported that PCP was well absorbed into the 

tissues of rabbits and caused accelerated respiration, hyperpyrexia, hyperglycemia and glycosuria to the 

exposed rabbits.

In vitro toxicokinetic studies in humans [Hortsman et al. 1989] also demonstrated that PCP is rapidly 

absorbed following dermal exposure, with 16% (aqueous solution of sodium PCP) and 62% (diesel oil 

solution of PCP) of the applied dose being absorbed in human cadaver skin. Baynes et al. [2002] 

evaluated the influence of single and binary solvents, a surfactant, and a rubifacient/vasodilator on the 

flux, permeability, and diffusivity of PCP following topical doses of 40 microgram per square 

centimeter (μg/cm2) or 4 μg/cm2in porcine skin membrane in vitro. Absorption of PCP ranged from 

1.55 to 15.62% for the high dose and 0.43 to 7.20% for the low dose, depending on the solvent [Baynes 

et al. 2002]. Flux ranged between 0.18 and 1.54 microgram per square centimeter per hour 

(μg/cm2/hour) at the high dose and 0.004 and 0.052 μg/cm2/hour, while permeability values ranged from 

0.06 to 0.65 μg/cm (high dose) and 0.04 to 0.19 μg/cm (low dose) [Baynes et al. 2002]. The potential of 

PCP to pose a skin absorption hazard was also evaluated, with use of a predictive algorithm for 

estimating and evaluating the health hazards of dermal exposure to substances [NIOSH 2009]. The 

evaluation method compares an estimated dose accumulated in the body from skin absorption and an 

estimated dose from respiratory absorption associated with a reference occupational exposure limit. On 

the basis of this algorithm, a ratio of the skin dose to the inhalation dose (SI ratio) of 0.77 was calculated 

for PCP. An SI ratio of ≥0.1 indicates that skin absorption may significantly contribute to the overall 

body burden of a substance [NIOSH 2009]; therefore, PCP is considered to be absorbed through the skin 

following dermal exposure. Additional information on the SI ratio and the variables used in its 

calculation are included in the appendix.
3

This information is distributed solely for the purpose of pre-dissemination peer review under applicable 

information quality guidelines. It has not been formally disseminated by the National Institute for Occupational 

Safety and Health. It does not represent and should not be construed to represent any agency determination or 

policy.

No dermal lethal concentration (LDLo) for humans has been identified. The reported dermal LD50 values 

(the dose resulting in 50% mortality in the exposed animals) reported for rats were 320 to 330 

milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg) [Gaines 1969]. In rabbits the LD50 values reported were between 316 

mg/kg and 631 mg/kg [Younger Laboratories Incorporated 1974, 1975, 1977]. Deichman [1942] and 

Kehoe et al. [1039] reported minimal lethal doses of PCP after cutaneous application that ranged from 

50 mg/kg to 170 mk/kg, depending on the vehicle solution. Kehoe et al. [1939] reported increased 

respiratory and cardiac rates and anorexia and weight loss when rabbits were given lethal and sub lethal 

doses. While the minimum lethal doses for rabbits were less than 200 mg/kg, the critical dermal LD50

value that identifies a chemical substance with the potential to be acutely fatal, the reported acute dermal 

LD50 values for rats and rabbits exceed this value. However, the reported LD50 values are lower than the 

critical dermal LD50 value of 2000 mg/kg body weight that identifies chemical substances with the 

potential for acute dermal toxicity [NIOSH 2009]. Therefore, on the basis of these data, PCP is acutely 

toxic following dermal exposure.

One epidemiological study and numerous case reports and case series of systemic effects produced by 

dermal exposure to PCP were identified. The epidemiological study looked at a cohort of workers across 

6 industries, of which 209 workers were exposed to PCP and 101 workers were not exposed [Jones et al. 

1986]. A case report from dermal absorption of PCP, based on urine measurement of the substance from 

48 hours to 30 days after exposure, was reported in an individual exposed to an organic solvent 

containing PCP when cleaning a paint brush using unprotected hands during the process [Bevenue et al. 

1967]. Numerous case reports described severe toxicity and/or death in individuals exposed 

predominantly by the dermal route to PCP [Blair 1961; Bergner et al. 1965; Robson et al. 1969; Wood et 

al. 1983]; however in several of these studies there was also potential for inhalation exposure. 

Symptoms commonly reported in the case series included weight loss, profuse sweating, and fever. In 

the fatal cases, there was extensive dermal exposure that occurred. For example, Bergner et al. [1965] 

presented a case series where five workers were exposed to PCP when dipping their hands in a mixture 

containing PCP when they were treating wood, one of which was a fatality. Use of gloves or other 

personal protective equipment (PPE) is not documented; however the authors did note that the fatality 

did not use PPE [Bergner et al. 1965]. Robson et al. [1969] reported 2 deaths in infants that had dermal 

contact to PCP through dermal exposure after bedding linens and diapers had been laundered in PCP. In 

a fatal case report involving only dermal exposure to PCP, the worker’s clothing was reported to have 

been covered in PCP powder on more than one occasion during the 3 weeks he worked in the chemical 

plant [Gray et al. 1985]. After death, the autopsy showed that the lungs were congested and edematous, 

the liver was congested and pale, and there was moderate cerebral edema [Gray et al. 1985].

No subchronic or chronic dermal toxicity studies in animals were identified and repeat-dose dermal 

toxicity studies of PCP in animals were limited to one study. In this study, repeated cutaneous 

application on the back of rabbits (once or twice a week for periods ranging from 6 to 61 weeks) of 10 to 

50 mg/kg of a 4% solution of PCP in Stanolex fuel oil produced no significant changes of the 

erythrocyte counts, differential counts, and hemoglobin levels, but resulted in the death of eight of 20 

rabbits [Deichmann et al. 1942]. The lowest dose that resulted in mortality after dermal application was 

250 mg/kg [Beichmann et al. 1942]. A Lowest Observed Adverse Effect Level (LOAEL) of 250 mg/kg 

can be observed from this study since no other health outcomes were reported. Because the LOAEL 

observed in this study is lower than the critical dose 1000 mg/kg that identifies chemical substances with 
4

This information is distributed solely for the purpose of pre-dissemination peer review under applicable 

information quality guidelines. It has not been formally disseminated by the National Institute for Occupational 

Safety and Health. It does not represent and should not be construed to represent any agency determination or 

policy.

the potential for repeated-dose toxicity [NIOSH 2009], this assessment concludes that PCP has the 

potential to be systemically available and potentially lethal. 

No standard toxicity or specialty studies evaluating biological system/function specific effects 

(including reproductive and developmental effects and immunotoxicity) following dermal exposure to 

PCP were identified. However, Daniel et al. [1995] reported alterations in immune functions (severe T 

lymphocyte dysfunction) in workers exposed to PCP-containing pesticides for more than 6 months. 

Another case study of immune function alterations was reported following a prolonged exposure in 

workers who brushed technical-grade PCP onto wood strips [Colosio et al. 1993]. However, lack of 

quantitative data regarding the PCP exposure level and duration precludes estimation of the dose at 

which these effects were elicited. 

Several epidemiological studies were identified that reported conflicting findings on the ability of PCP 

to cause cancer in humans [Gilbert et al. 1990; Johnson et al. 1990; Hardell et al. 1994]. In a study that 

reported a positive correlation between skin contact to PCP and systemic cancers, the investigators 

described potential confounding factors including the possibility that the effects observed may also be 

due to other components/impurities of commercial grade of PCP used [Hardell et al. 1994]. No standard 

rodent cancer bioassays investigating the ability of PCP to cause systemic cancers following dermal 

exposure were identified. In a skin tumor promotion study, Chang et al. [2003] reported that histological 

examination revealed lymphomas in the liver, spleen, and kidney in mice treated with 50 micrograms 

(μg) PCP in 100 microliters (μL) of acetone twice a week for 20 or 25 weeks following treatment with a 

tumor initiator. Table 2 summarizes carcinogenic designations of multiple governmental and 

nongovernmental organizations for PCP. 

Table 2. Summary of the carcinogenic designations* for PCP by numerous governmental and 

nongovernmental organizations

Organization Carcinogenic designation 

NIOSH [2005] No designation

NTP [2014] No designation

USEPA [2014] Likely to be carcinogenic to humans

European Parliament [2008] GHS Carcinogenicity Category 2: Suspected of causing 

cancer

IARC [2012] Group 2B: Possibly carcinogenic to humans

EC [2013]† R40: Limited evidence of a carcinogenic effect

ACGIH [2014] Group A3: Confirmed animal carcinogen with unknown 

relevance to humans

ACGIH = American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists; EC = European Commission, Joint Research, 

Institute for Health and Consumer Protection; GHS = Globally Harmonized System for Labelling and Classification of 

Chemicals; IARC = International Agency for Research on Cancer; NIOSH = National Institute for Occupational Safety and 

Health; NTP = National Toxicology Program; USEPA = United States Environmental Protection Agency.

* The listed cancer designations were based on data from nondermal (such as oral or inhalation) exposure since studies using 

the dermal route of exposure were unavailable.

†Date accessed.
5

This information is distributed solely for the purpose of pre-dissemination peer review under applicable 

information quality guidelines. It has not been formally disseminated by the National Institute for Occupational 

Safety and Health. It does not represent and should not be construed to represent any agency determination or 

policy.

Information from case reports [Begley et al. 1977; Jones et al. 1986]

1

, and in vitro studies [Hortsman 

et al. 1989; Baynes et al. 2002] indicate that PCP is absorbed through the skin following dermal 

exposure. Acute dermal toxicity studies in animals [Gaines 1969; Younger Laboratories Incorporated 

1974, 1975, 1977; Gasiewicz 1991], experimental studies in rabbits [Kehoe et al 1939], a repeat dose 

study [Beichmann et al. 1942], and immunotoxicity observed by Daniel et al. [1995] demonstrate that 

the substance is systemically available, acutely toxic and can cause hematological effects and 

immunotoxicity. Several cases of acute toxicity followed by death has also been reported [Blair 1961; 

Bergner et al. 1965; Robson et al. 1969; Gray et al. 1985] following dermal exposure. Therefore, on 

the basis of the data for this assessment, PCP is assigned the SK: SYS(FATAL) notation. 

3.0 Direct Effects on Skin (SK: DIR)

No human or animal in vivo studies on corrosivity of PCP or in vitro tests for corrosivity using human or 

animal skin models or in vitro tests of skin integrity using cadaver skin were identified. A number of 

dermal irritation studies in experimental animals were identified. According to Kehoe et al. [1939], the 

severity of skin irritation of rabbits exposed to PCP depended to a large extent on the vehicle employed, 

with the most pronounced effects seen with petroleum solvents; however even the most pronounced 

effects were reversible. Deichmann et al. [1942] observed local and systemic effects following repeated 

cutaneous application of PCP in various solvents to the rabbit skin. Based on their results, Deichmann et 

al. [1942] concluded that irritation of the skin and marked reversible local damage is the usual result of 

cutaneous application of single or repeated doses of PCP in fuel oils. Johnson et al. [1973] reported acne 

in rabbits after technical-grade PCP was applied to the ear. However, the authors found no such effects 

after applying chemically pure PCP, an observation that suggests that contaminants rather than PCP may 

be responsible for the effects. Studies conducted by Younger Laboratories Incorporated [1974, 1975] 

observed a primary irritation score of 2.1 in rabbits administered 0.5 milliliters (mL) of undiluted PCP, 

indicating slight irritation. The authors reported a defatting effect for 10 to 14 days following 

administration. The structure activity relationship model, Deductive Estimation of Risk from Existing 

Knowledge (DEREK), predicted PCP to be negative for skin irritation. 

Animal studies were reviewed that investigated the potential for PCP to promote the growth of skin 

tumors. A skin tumor promotion study involved a single application to the dorsal shaved skin of each of 

10 mice of 100 μg of DMBA in 100 μL of acetone as an initiator, followed one week later by topical 

treatment with 0, 2.5, 50, or 1000 μg PCP in 100 μL of acetone twice a week for 20 or 25 weeks from 

the treatment of DMBA [Chang et al. 2003]. PCP induced a significant increase in squamous cell 

papillomas, described by Chang et al. 2003 as benign, in mouse skin, however the effect was less than 

what was seen when using the classical tumor promoter 12-O-tetradecanoylphorbol-13-acetate (TPA, 

2.5 μg per mouse) as a positive control. Epidermal hyperplasia and increased proliferation index were 

also reported with PCP exposure [Chang et al. 2003]. Chang et al. [2003] concluded that PCP was a 

tumor promoter in this study. 

 

1References in bold text indicate studies that serve as the basis of the SK assignments.
6

This information is distributed solely for the purpose of pre-dissemination peer review under applicable 

information quality guidelines. It has not been formally disseminated by the National Institute for Occupational 

Safety and Health. It does not represent and should not be construed to represent any agency determination or 

policy.

Although direct skin effect data in humans is unavailable, the animal data indicate PCP is a skin irritant 

[Kehoe et al. 1939; Deichmann et al. 1942; Johnson et al. 1973] and tumor promoter [Chang et al. 

2003]. Therefore, on the basis of the data for this assessment, PCP is assigned the SK: DIR (IRR) 

notation. 

4.0 Immune-mediated Responses (SK: SEN)

There is insufficient information available to suggest that PCP is a skin sensitizer. Although chloracne, 

chronic urticaria, and pemphigus vulgaris have been reported following exposure to technical grade PCP 

possibly with high dioxin levels [Cole et al. 1986; Lambert et al. 1986; Gerhard et al. 1991], these 

reactions are not delayed-type hypersensitivity reactions. No specific information on skin sensitization 

due to PCP is available from occupational exposure experience. No standard studies in humans or 

animals were identified regarding skin sensitization potential of PCP. DEREK predicted PCP to be 

negative as a skin sensitizer. Absence of human patch tests or predictive tests in animals preclude 

adequate evaluation of the potential of PCP to be a skin sensitizer. Therefore, on the basis of the data for 

this assessment, PCP is not assigned the SK: SEN notation. 

5.0 Summary

Information from case reports [Begley et al. 1977; Jones et al. 1986], and in vitro studies [Hortsman et 

al. 1989; Baynes et al. 2002] indicate that PCP is absorbed through the skin following dermal exposure. 

Acute dermal toxicity studies in animals [Gaines 1969; Younger Laboratories Incorporated 1974, 

1975, 1977; Gasiewicz 1991], experimental studies in rabbits [Kehoe et al 1939], a repeat dose study 

[Beichmann et al. 1942], and immunotoxicity observed by Daniel et al. [1995] demonstrate that the 

substance is systemically available, acutely toxic and can cause hematological effects and 

immunotoxicity. Several cases of acute toxicity followed by death has also been reported [Blair 1961; 

Bergner et al. 1965; Robson et al. 1969; Gray et al. 1985] following extensive dermal exposure. 

Although direct skin effect data in humans are unavailable, the animal data indicate PCP is a likely skin 

irritant in humans [Kehoe et al. 1939; Deichmann et al. 1942; Johnson et al. 1973] and tumor 

promoter [Chang et al. 2003]. Insufficient data are available to determine if PCP is capable of causing 

systemic or skin cancers following dermal exposures. Studies that evaluated the skin sensitization 

potential of PCP were not identified, precluding assessment of this endpoint. Therefore, on the basis of 

these assessments, PCP is assigned a composite skin notation of SK: SYS(FATAL)-DIR (IRR). 

Table 3 summarizes the skin hazard designations for PCP previously issued by NIOSH and other 

organizations. The equivalent dermal designations for PCP, according to the Globally Harmonized 

System (GHS) of Classification and Labelling of Chemicals, are Acute Toxicity Category 3 (Hazard 

statement: Toxic in contact with the skin) and Skin Irritation Category 2 (Hazard statement: Causes skin 

irritation) [European Parliament 2008]. 
7

This information is distributed solely for the purpose of pre-dissemination peer review under applicable 

information quality guidelines. It has not been formally disseminated by the National Institute for Occupational 

Safety and Health. It does not represent and should not be construed to represent any agency determination or 

policy.

Table 3. Summary of previous skin hazard designations for PCP

Organization Skin hazard designation 

NIOSH [2005] [skin]: Potential for dermal absorption

OSHA [2015]*[skin]: Potential for dermal absorption

ACGIH [2001] [skin]: PCP caused chloracne in workers and is readily abosrped 

through the skin cauing systemic toxicity and death

EC [2013]* R24: Toxic in contact with skin

R38: Irritating to skin

ACGIH = American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists; EC = European Commission, Joint Research, 

Institute for Health and Consumer Protection; NIOSH = National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health; OSHA = 

Occupational Safety and Health Administration.

*Date accessed.
8

This information is distributed solely for the purpose of pre-dissemination peer review under applicable 

information quality guidelines. It has not been formally disseminated by the National Institute for Occupational 

Safety and Health. It does not represent and should not be construed to represent any agency determination or 

policy.

References

Note: Asterisks (*) denote sources cited in text; daggers (†) denote additional resources.

*ACGIH (American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists) [2014]. Pentachlorophenol. In: 

TLVs and BEIs: Based on the documentation of threshold limit values for chemical substances and 

physical agents and biological exposure indices. Cincinnati, OH: American Conference of 

Governmental Industrial Hygienists.

*ATSDR [2001]. Toxicological profile for pentachlorophenol. Atlanta, GA: U.S. Department of Health 

and Human Services, Public Health Service, ATSDR, http://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/toxprofiles/tp51.pdf. 

Accessed: 01-27-15.

*Baynes RE, Brooks JD, Mumtaz M, Riviere JE [2002]. Effect of Chemical Interactions in PCP 

Mixtures on Skin and Membrane Transport. Tox Sci 69:295-305.

*Begley J, Reichert EL, Rashad MN, Klemmer HW [1977]. Association between renal function tests 

and pentachlorophenol exposure. Clin Toxicol 11(1): 97-106.

*Bergner H, Constantinidis P, Martin JH [1965]. Industrial pentachlorophenol poisoning in Winnipeg. 

Can Med Assoc J 92: 448-451.

*Bevenue A, Haley TJ, Klemmer HW [1967]. A note on the effects of a temporary exposure of an 

individual to pentachlorophenol. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol 2: 293-296.

*Blair DM [1961]. Dangers in using and handling sodium pentachlorophenate as a molluscicide. Bull 

World Health Organ 25: 597-601.

*Boutwell RK, Bosch DK [1959]. The tumor-promoting action of phenol and related compounds for 

mouse skin. Cancer Res 19:413-424.

*Chang WC, Jeng JH, Shieh CC, Tsai YC, Ho YS, Guo HR, Liu HI, Lee CC, Ho SY, Wang YJ [2003]. 

Skin tumor-promoting potential and systemic effects of pentachlorophenol and its major metabolite 

tetrachlorohydroquinone in CD-1 Mice. Mol Carcinog 36(4): 161-170.

*Cole GW, Stone O, Gates D, Culver D [1986]. Chloracne from PCP-preserved wood. Contact 

Dermatitis 15: 164-168.

*Colosio C, Maroni M, Barcellini W, Maroni P, Alcini D, Colombi A, Cavallo D, Foa V [1993]. 

Toxicological and immune findings in workers exposed to PCP (PCP). Arch Environ Health 48:81-88.

*Daniel V, Huber W, Bauer K, Opelz G [1995]. Impaired in-vitro lymphocyte responses in patients with 

elevated PCP (PCP) blood levels. Arch Environ Health 50:287-292.
9

This information is distributed solely for the purpose of pre-dissemination peer review under applicable 

information quality guidelines. It has not been formally disseminated by the National Institute for Occupational 

Safety and Health. It does not represent and should not be construed to represent any agency determination or 

policy.

*Deichmann W, Machle W, Kitzmiller KV, Thomas G [1942]. Acute and chronic effects of PCP and 

sodium pentachlorophenate upon experimental animals. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 76:104-117.

*EC (European Commission) [ND]. Pentachlorophenol. In: EINICS (European Inventory of Existing 

Commercial Chemical Substances), http://esis.jrc.ec.europa.eu/. Accessed: 04-04-13.

*European Parliament, Council of the European Union [2008]. Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008

of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 December 2008 on classification, labeling and 

packaging of substances and mixtures, amending and repealing Directives 67/548/

EEC and 1999/45/EC, and amending Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006. OJEU, Off J Eur Union L353:1–

1355, http://eurex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:L:2008:353:0001:1355:EN:PDF. 

Accessed: 01-27-15.

*Gasiewicz TA [1991]. Nitro Compounds and Related Phenolic Pesticides – PCP. In: Handbook of 

Pesticide Toxicology, Vol. 3, Classes of Pesticides, pp 1206-1253, Hayes, WJ and Lews Jr., Eds. 

Adademic Press, Inc. New York.

*Gerhard I, Derner M, and Runnebaum B [1991]. Prolonged Exposure to Wood Preservatives Induces 

Endocrine and Immunologic Disorders in Women. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 165: 487-488. 

*Gilbert FI Jr, Minn CE, Duncan RC, Wilkinsin J [1990]. Effects of PCP and other chemical 

preservatives on the health of wood-treating workers in Hawaii. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 19:603-

609.

*Gray RE, Gilliland RD, Smith EE, Lockard VG, Hume AS [1985]. PCP intoxication: Report of a fatal 

case, with comments on the clinical course and pathologic anatomy. Arch Environ Health 40:161-164.

*Hardell L, Eriksson M, Degerman A [1994]. Exposure to Phenoxyacetic Acids, Chlorophenols, or 

Organic Solvents in Relation to Histopathology, Stage, and Anatomical Localization of Non-Hodgkin’s 

Lymphoma. Cancer Res 54: 2386-2389.

†Hardell L, Erikksson M, Degereman A [1995]. Meta-analysis of four Swedish case-control studies on 

exposure to pesticides as risk-factor for soft-tissue sarcoma including the relation to tumour localization 

and histopathological type. Int J Oncol 6:847-851.

†Hertzman C, Teschke K, Ostry A, Hershler R, Dimich-Ward H, Kelley S, Spinelli JJ, Gallagher RP, 

McBride M, Marion SA [1997]. Mortality and cancer incidence among sawmill workers exposed to 

chlorophenate wood preservatives. Am J Public Health 87:71-79.

*Horstman SW, Rossner A., Kalman DA, Morgan MS [1989]. Penetration of PCP and tetrachlorophenol 

through human skin. Journal of Environmental Science and Health - Part A Environmental Science and 

Engineering 24: 229-242.
10

This information is distributed solely for the purpose of pre-dissemination peer review under applicable 

information quality guidelines. It has not been formally disseminated by the National Institute for Occupational 

Safety and Health. It does not represent and should not be construed to represent any agency determination or 

policy.

†Hoppin JA, Tolbert PE, Herrick RF, Freedman DS, Ragsdale BD, Horvat KR, Brann EA [1998]. 

Occupational chlorophenol exposure and soft tissue sarcoma risk among men aged 30-60 years. Am J 

Epidemiol 148:693-703.

*IARC (International Agency for Research on Cancer) [2012]. Agents reviewed by the IARC 

monographs. In: IARC monographs on the evaluation of carcinogenic risks to humans, 

http://monographs.iarc.fr/ENG/Monographs/PDFs/index.php. Accessed: 01-27-15.

†Jäppinen P, Pukkala E, Tola S [1989]. Cancer incidence of workers in a Finnish sawmill. Scand J Work 

Environ Health 15:18-23.

*Johnson RL, Gehring PJ, Kociba RJ, Schwetz BA [1973]. Chlorinated dibenzodioxins and PCP. 

Environ Health Perpect. 5: 171-175. 

*Johnson CC, Feingold M, Tilley B [1990]. A meta-analysis of exposure to phenoxy acid herbicides and 

chlorophenols in relation to risk of soft tissue sarcoma. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 62:513-520.

*Jones RD, Winter DP, Cooper AJ [1986]. Absorption study of PCP in persons working with wood 

preservatives. Human Toxicol 5:189-194.

†Jorens PG, Schepens JC [1993]. Human PCP poisoning. Human and Exp Toxicol 12:479-495.

*Kehoe, RAW [1939]. Toxic effects upon rabbits of PCP and sodium pentachlorophenate. J. Ind. Hyg. 

Toxicol. 21: 160.

*Lambert J, Schepens P, Janssens J, Dockx P [1986]. Skin lesions as a sign of subacute PCP 

intoxication. Acta Derm Venreol 66:170-172.

*Lampi P, Hakilinen T, Luostarinen T, Pukkala E, Teppo L [1992]. Cancer incidence following 

chlorophenol exposure in a community in South Finland. Arch Environ Health 47(39): 167-175

*NIOSH [2005]. NIOSH pocket guide to chemical hazards. Cincinnati, OH: U.S. Department of Health 

and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Institute for Occupational 

Safety and Health, DHHS (NIOSH) Publication No. 2005-149, http://www.cdc.gov/niosh/npg/. 

Accessed: 01-27-15.

*NIOSH [2009]. Current intelligence bulletin 61: a strategy for assigning new NIOSH skin notations. 

Cincinnati, OH: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and 

Prevention, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, DHHS (NIOSH) Publication No. 

2009-147, http://www.cdc.gov/niosh/docs/2009-147/pdfs/2009-147.pdf. Accessed: 01-27-15.

*NTP [2014]. Report on Carcinogens. Thirteenth Edition; U.S. Department of Health and Human 

Services, Public Health Service. National Toxicology Program, 

http://ntp.niehs.nih.gov/pubhealth/roc/roc13/index.html. Accessed: 01-27-15.
11

This information is distributed solely for the purpose of pre-dissemination peer review under applicable 

information quality guidelines. It has not been formally disseminated by the National Institute for Occupational 

Safety and Health. It does not represent and should not be construed to represent any agency determination or 

policy.

*OSHA [ND]. Pentachlorophenol. In: OSHA occupational and chemical database, 

https://www.osha.gov/chemicaldata/chemResult.html?recNo=726. Accessed: 01-27-15.

†Qiao GL, Brooks JD, Riviere JE [1997]. PCP dermal absorption and disposition from soil in swine: 

Effects of occlusion and skin microorganism inhibition. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 147:234-246.

*Robson AM, Kissane JM, Elvick HN, Pundavcla L [1969]. PCP poisoning in a nursery for newborn 

infants: I. Clinical features and treatment. J Pediatr 75:309-316.

*USEPA [2014]. Integrated Risk Information System: pentachlorophenol. In: Integrated Risk 

Information System, http://www.epa.gov/iris/subst/0086.htm. Accessed: 01-27-15.

†Wester RC, Maibach HI, Sedik L, Melendres J, Wade M, DiZio S [1993]. Percutaneous absorption of 

PCP from soil. Fundam Appl Toxicol 20:68-71.

*Wood S, Rom WN, White GL, Logan DC [1983]. PCP poisoning. J Occup Med 25:527-530.

*Younger Laboratories Incorporated [1974]. Toxicologic investigation of AD 73/penta blend. Younger 

Laboratories Incorporated, Project #Y-74-121 for Monsanto Company. On file with the U.S. 

Environmental Protection Agency under TSCA Section 8D. OTS #0546023. Document #88-920007878.

*Younger Laboratories Incorporated [1975]. Toxicologic investigation of penta (prilled). Younger 

Laboratories Incorporated, Project #Y-74-261 for Monsanto Company. On file with the U.S. 

Environmental Protection Agency under TSCA Section 8D. OTS #0570564. Document #88-920007950.

*Younger Laboratories Incorporated [1977]. Toxicity studies on penta oil E101-6001. Younger 

Laboratories Incorporated, Project #Y-77-255 for Monsanto Company. On file with the U.S. 

Environmental Protection Agency under TSCA Section 8D. OTS #0545854. Document #88-920007660.
12

This information is distributed solely for the purpose of pre-dissemination peer review under applicable 

information quality guidelines. It has not been formally disseminated by the National Institute for Occupational 

Safety and Health. It does not represent and should not be construed to represent any agency determination or 

policy.

Appendix: Calculation of the SI Ratio for PCP

This appendix presents an overview of the SI ratio and a summary of the calculation of the SI ratio for 

PCP. Although the SI ratio is considered in the determination of a substance’s hazard potential following 

skin contact, it is intended only to serve as supportive data during the assignment of the NIOSH SK. An 

in-depth discussion on the rationale and calculation of the SI ratio can be found in Appendix B of the 

Current Intelligence Bulletin (CIB) 61: A Strategy for Assigning New NIOSH Skin Notations [NIOSH 

2009]. 

Overview 

The SI ratio is a predictive algorithm for estimating and evaluating the health hazards of skin exposure 

to substances. The algorithm is designed to evaluate the potential for a substance to penetrate the skin 

and induce systemic toxicity [NIOSH 2009]. The goals for incorporating this algorithm into the 

proposed strategy for assigning SYS notation are as follows:

(1) Provide an alternative method to evaluate substances for which no clinical reports or animal 

toxicity studies exist or for which empirical data are insufficient to determine systemic effects.

(2) Use the algorithm evaluation results to determine whether a substance poses a skin absorption 

hazard and should be labeled with the SYS notation.

The algorithm evaluation includes three steps:

(1) determining a skin permeation coefficient (kp) for the substance of interest,

(2) estimating substance uptake by the skin and respiratory absorption routes, and 

(3) evaluating whether the substance poses a skin exposure hazard.

The algorithm is flexible in the data requirement and can operate entirely on the basis of the 

physicochemical properties of a substance and the relevant exposure parameters. Thus, the algorithm is 

independent of the need for biologic data. Alternatively, it can function with both the physicochemical 

properties and the experimentally determined permeation coefficient when such data are available and 

appropriate for use.

The first step in the evaluation is to determine the kp for the substance to describe the transdermal 

penetration rate of the substance [NIOSH 2009]. The kp, which represents the overall diffusion of the 

substance through the stratum corneum and into the blood capillaries of the dermis, is estimated from 

the compound’s molecular weight (MW) and base-10 logarithm of its octanol–water partition coefficient 

(log KOW). In this example, kp is determined for a substance with use of Equation 1. A self-consistent set 

of units must be used, such as outlined in Table A1. Other model-based estimates of kp may also be used 

[NIOSH 2009].
13

This information is distributed solely for the purpose of pre-dissemination peer review under applicable 

information quality guidelines. It has not been formally disseminated by the National Institute for Occupational 

Safety and Health. It does not represent and should not be construed to represent any agency determination or 

policy.

Equation 1: Calculation of Skin Permeation Coefficient (kp)

psc pol aq

p

k k k

k

1 1

1







where kpsc is the permeation coefficient in the lipid fraction of the stratum corneum, kpol is the coefficient 

in the protein fraction of the stratum corneum, and kaq is the coefficient in the watery epidermal layer.

These components are individually estimated by

log kpsc = −1.326 + 0.6097 × log Kow − 0.1786 × MW0.5

kpol = 0.0001519 × MW−0.5

kaq = 2.5 × MW−0.5

The second step is to calculate the biologic mass uptake of the substance from skin absorption (skin 

dose) and inhalation (inhalation dose) during the same period of exposure. The skin dose is calculated as 

a mathematical product of the kp, the water solubility (SW) of the substance, the exposed skin surface 

area, and the duration of exposure. Its units are milligrams (mg). Assume that the skin exposure 

continues for 8 hours to unprotected skin on the palms of both hands (a surface area of 360 squared 

centimeters [cm2]). 

Equation 2: Determination of Skin Dose

Skin dose = kp × Sw × Exposed skin surface area × Exposure time

 = kp(cm/hour) × Sw (mg/cm3) × 360 cm2× 8 hours

The inhalation dose (in mg) is derived on the basis of the occupational exposure limit (OEL) of the 

substance—if the OEL is developed to prevent the occurrence of systemic effects rather than 

sensory/irritant effects or direct effects on the respiratory tract. Assume a continuous exposure of 8 

hours, an inhalation volume of 10 cubic meters (m3) inhaled air in 8 hours, and a factor of 75% for 

retention of the airborne substance in the lungs during respiration (retention factor, or RF).

Equation 3: Determination of Inhalation Dose

Inhalation dose = OEL × Inhalation volume × RF

 = OEL (mg/m3) × 10 m3× 0.75

The final step is to compare the calculated skin and inhalation doses and to present the result as a ratio of 

skin dose to inhalation dose (the SI ratio). This ratio quantitatively indicates (1) the significance of 

dermal absorption as a route of occupational exposure to the substance and (2) the contribution of 

dermal uptake to systemic toxicity. If a substance has an SI ratio greater than or equal to 0.1, it is 

considered a skin absorption hazard.
14

This information is distributed solely for the purpose of pre-dissemination peer review under applicable 

information quality guidelines. It has not been formally disseminated by the National Institute for Occupational 

Safety and Health. It does not represent and should not be construed to represent any agency determination or 

policy.

Calculation 

Table A1 summarizes the data applied in the previously described equations to determine the SI ratio for 

PCP. The calculated SI ratio was 0.77. On the basis of these results, PCP is predicted to represent a skin 

absorption hazard.

Table A1. Summary of Data used to Calculate the SI Ratio for PCP 

Variables Used in Calculation Units Value 

Skin permeation coefficient

Permeation coefficient of stratum corneum lipid path(kpsc) cm/hour 0.1284

Permeation coefficient of the protein fraction of the stratum 

corneum (kpol) cm/hour 1.0097 × 10-5

Permeation coefficient of the watery epidermal layer (kaq) cm/hour 0.1662

Molecular weight (MW)

*

amu 226.34

Base-10 logarithm of its octanol–water partition coefficient 

(Log Kow)

* None 5.12

Calculated skin permeation coefficient (kp) cm/hour 7.2448 × 10-2

Skin dose

Water solubility (Sw)

* mg/cm3

0.014

Calculated skin permeation coefficient (kp) cm/hour 7.2448 × 10-2

Estimated skin surface area (palms of hand) cm2360

Exposure time hour 8

Calculated skin dose mg 2.92

Inhalation Dose

Occupational exposure limit (OEL)† mg/m30.5

Inhalation volume m

3

10

Retention factor (RF) None 0.75

Inhalation dose mg 3.75

Skin dose–to–inhalation dose (SI) ratio None 0.77

*

Variables identified from SRC [ND].

†

The OEL used in calculation of the SI ratio for PCP was the NIOSH recommended exposure limit (REL) [NIOSH 

2005].
15

This information is distributed solely for the purpose of pre-dissemination peer review under applicable 

information quality guidelines. It has not been formally disseminated by the National Institute for Occupational 

Safety and Health. It does not represent and should not be construed to represent any agency determination or 

policy.

Appendix References 

NIOSH [2005]. NIOSH pocket guide to chemical hazards. Cincinnati, OH: U.S. Department of Health 

and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Institute for Occupational 

Safety and Health, DHHS (NIOSH) Publication No. 2005–149, http://www.cdc.gov/niosh/npg/. 

Accessed: 01-27-15.

NIOSH [2009]. Current intelligence bulletin 61: a strategy for assigning new NIOSH skin notations. 

Cincinnati, OH: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and 

Prevention, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, DHHS (NIOSH) Publication No. 

2009-147, http://www.cdc.gov/niosh/docs/2009-147/pdfs/2009-147.pdf. Accessed: 01-27-15.

SRC [ND]. Interactive PhysProp database demo, 

http://esc.syrres.com/fatepointer/webprop.asp?CAS=87865. Accessed: 01-27-15.