alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 3.6

                         CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT OF THE

                          CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION

                                       OF

                              DEL ELECTRONICS CORP.

                    Under  Section  805 of the  Business  Corporation  Law it is
hereby certified that:

                 FIRST:     The name of the Corporation is DEL ELECTRONICS CORP.


                 SECOND: The certificate of incorporation of the Corporation was
filed by the Department of State on October 26, 1954.

                 THIRD: The amendment of the certificate of incorporation of the
Corporation effected by this certificate of amendment is as follows:

                 to  change   the  name  of  the   Corporation   to  DEL  GLOBAL
TECHNOLOGIES CORP.

                 FOURTH:  To  accomplish  the  foregoing  amendment,   paragraph
"First" of the certificate of incorporation of the Corporation is hereby amended
to read as follows:


                 "FIRST: The name of the Corporation is DEL GLOBAL  TECHNOLOGIES
CORP."


                 FIFTH:   The  foregoing   amendment  of  the   certificate   of
incorporation  of the  Corporation  was authorized by the Board of Directors and
followed by the majority vote of the holders of all of the outstanding shares of
the  Corporation  entitled  to vote  on such  amendment  of the  certificate  of
incorporation.


                 IN WITNESS  WHEREOF,  we have hereunto signed this  certificate
this 14th day of February,  1996, and affirmed that the  statements  made herein
are true under penalties of perjury.



                                             /S/Leonard A. Trugman
                                             -----------------------
                                             Leonard A. Trugman, President



                                             /S/Michael Taber      
                                             ----------------------
                                             Michael Taber, Secretary
Williams, Renee (OST) 

From: 

Sent: 

Rich Corbett [tiparrotheads@yahoo.com] 

Saturday, August 21,20102:52 PM 

To: EAS (OST) 

Subject: Support for Cape Air at Watertown, NY 

Hello, 

We have already sent in a letter of support for Cape Air's EAS proposal for the North Country stations in New 

York. Seeing the newspaper story today showing Jefferson County has decided to announce their support for 

Cape Air's compeititor on the last day of submissions has forced me to write one more time. Since the 1000 

Islands Parrot Head Club has already expressed our support for the Cape Air proposal and since there was no 

public forum by Jefferson County for people to express their opinion, we hope you will accept this as a rebuttal 

to the Jefferson County endorsement. 

In our previous letter of support, we told of how Cape Air had supported the 1000 Islands Parrot Head Club and 

how they have helped us raise over $10,000 for Make A Wish over the past three summers. 

We are sure you know, but we want to point out the added cost of the Gulfstream International proposal for 

service that is being offered by Cape Air albeit with a quick stop in Albany. Gulfstream is offering less flights 

per day. Yes, on weekdays, this would provide nine more seats on two flights than Cape Air offers on three, but 

on weekends, it would actually offer less seats with only one flight per day, again at a much higher subsidy. 

Newspaper (Watetown Daily Times) reports say Gulfstream swayed Massena's endorsement after the Town had 

already voted to support Cape Air by offering Albany service out of Ogdensburg if they receive the contract. It 

is unfair to change their proposal in midstream after they have seen the opposing proposal. On top of that, 

Ogdensburg has endorsed Cape Air with a connecting flight, Albany to Boston, at a much lower subsidy level. 

Gulfstream says they will maintain flights for $39 to Boston. With a proposed $15 million in subsidies for the 

three airports over two years, they could afford to fly people for free! Is this what EAS is intended to do? 

We also feel it was unfair for Jefferson County to hold back their endorsement until the last day of public 

comment, in effect keeping the public from responding to their endorsement. 

If the community was filling the Cape Air flights, we could understand the need for larger aircraft. The Beech 

1900 has serviced this area before without being able to produce the numbers Jefferson County is looking for. 

Is it worth a $15 million gamble over two years to move away from a stable air carrier that continues to provide 

reliable service while being a good partner in the community? 

We hope you consider our comments. 

Thank you 

Andrea Bos 

President 

1000 Islands Parrot Head Club 

P.O. Box 8263 

Watertown, NY 13601 

1
U.S. flag
              An official website of the United States government





---

close


Norway
 Basic Facts Population
 People per sq. km
 Males per 100 females
 Children per woman
 Goods exported from U.S.
 Goods imported to U.S.
 Change in exports from U.S. for 2013 to 2022
 A Closer Look Source
 Comparisons
 Compared to the U.S.
 Compared to the World
 K = Thousands
				M = Millions
				B = Billions
  Merchandise Trade U.S. Trade in Manufactured Goods
 Top Exported Goods by U.S. State or Territory
 Population Current and Projected Population
 Population by Age and Sex
 Source and Notes Source: U.S. Census Bureau, International Database (demographic data) and USA Trade Online (trade data); Central Intelligence Agency, The World Fact Book (country reference maps). This application presents data for 228 countries and areas of the world with a 2024 population of 5,000 or more. For eleven of those countries and areas, only demographic data are presented. "Data not available" indicates that data are not available from this application.  In such instances, data may be available elsewhere at the census.gov website. Trade figures presented for France do not include data for overseas departments French Guiana, Guadeloupe, Martinique, Mayotte, and Reunion but do include data for dependencies Saint Barthelemy and Saint Martin.  Trade figures for the United Kingdom include data for crown dependencies Guernsey, Isle of Man, and Jersey. To learn more about world population projections, go to Notes on the World Population Clock. To learn more about international trade data, go to Guide to Foreign Trade Statistics. All trade figures are in U.S. dollars on a nominal basis.


CONNECT WITH US
 Information Quality
                    Data Linkage Infrastructure
                    Data Protection and Privacy Policy
                    Accessibility      
                    FOIA
                    Inspector General
                    No FEAR Act
                    U.S. Department of Commerce
                    USA.gov
  Measuring America's People, Places, and Economy
<PAGE>   1
                                 Exhibit 11.1



                          ELANTEC SEMICONDUCTOR, INC.
                 STATEMENT RE COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS (LOSS)
                     (IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                               Three Months Ended
                                                                   December 31,
                                                             ------------------------
                                                              1996             1995
                                                             -------          -------
<S>                                                          <C>              <C>
Net income                                                   $   (97)         $ 1,121
                                                             =======          =======

Common and common equivalent shares outstanding:
   Common stock                                                8,759            8,142
   Common stock options                                          ---            1,032
                                                             -------          -------
                                                               8,759            9,174

Common and common equivalent shares used in
   computing per share amounts                                 8,759            9,174
                                                             =======          =======
Net income per share                                         $ (0.01)         $  0.12
                                                             =======          =======
</TABLE>



-------------- 
(1) Effect of Common Stock options is excluded in 1996 as effect 
    is antidilutive.
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3246 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 3246

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             July 20, 1994

  Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Governmental 
                                Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
To amend title 39, United States Code, to make applicable with respect 
  to the United States Postal Service certain exclusionary authority 
  relating to the treatment of reemployed annuitants under the civil 
            service retirement laws, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF EXCLUSIONARY AUTHORITY.

    Section 1005(d) of title 39, United States Code, is amended--
            (1) by striking ``(d)'' and inserting ``(d)(1)''; and
            (2) by adding at the end the following:
    ``(2) The provisions of subsections (i) and (l)(2) of section 8344, 
and of subsections (f) and (i)(2) of section 8468, of title 5 shall 
apply with respect to the Postal Service. For purposes of so applying 
such provisions--
            ``(A) any reference in such provisions to the head of an 
        Executive agency shall be considered a reference to the 
        Postmaster General; and
            ``(B) any reference in such provisions to an employee shall 
        be considered a reference to an officer or employee of the 
        Postal Service.''.

SEC. 2. ASSIGNMENT AUTHORITY.

    Section 8706(e) of title 5, United States Code, is amended--
            (1) by striking ``Federal judge'' and inserting ``employee 
        or former employee'';
            (2) by striking ``judge's'' and inserting ``employee's or 
        former employee's''; and
            (3) by striking ``purchase'' and inserting ``purchased''.
            Passed the House of Representatives July 19, 1994.
            Attest:
                                                   DONNALD K. ANDERSON,
                                                                 Clerk.
```
# C_2014408EN.01002501.xml

| 15.11.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 408/25 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.11.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 408/25

---

IMI JOINT UNDERTAKING

Publication of the final accounts for the financial year 2013

2014/C 408/25

The complete version of the final accounts may be found at the following address:

http://www.imi.europa.eu/sites/default/files/uploads/documents/Budget%20and%20Accounts/2013_Final%20Annual%20Accounts.docx_.pdf

---
# C_2012384EN.01000301.xml

| 13.12.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 384/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.12.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 384/3

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.6715 — CNOOC/Nexen)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2012/C 384/02

On 7 December 2012, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32012M6715. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32012M6715. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.

---
## COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02

- 18

- 00188

- CV

Mark Scho mburg

v.

Bankers Insurance, LLC §

§

§

§ From the 271st District Court

of Wise County (CV17

- 07

- 554)

Ju ly 19 , 201 8

Per Curiam



### JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that

the appeal should be dismissed. It is ordered that the appeal is dismissed for

want of jurisdiction.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

PER CURIAM
#### Leola Cary DARVILLE et vir., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. SOUTHERN FARM BUREAU CASUALTY INSURANCE CO. et al., Defendants-Appellees.

No. 7061.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, First Circuit.

May 29, 1967.

Rehearing Denied June 30, 1967.

Percy, Macmurdo & Gray, Baton Rouge, for appellants.

Theo. F. Cangelosi, John Schwab and Robert L. Cangelosi, Baton Rouge, for Hy-mel Store Co., defendant-third-party plaintiff and appellant.

Robert J. Vandaworker, of Taylor, Porter, Brooks, Fuller & Phillips, Baton Rouge, for Southern Farm Bureau Cas. Ins. Co., defendant-appellee.

Before ELLIS and BAILES, JJ.

BAILES, Judge.

For the reasons assigned in the companion case of Harris et al. v. Hymel Store Co., Inc., et al., La.App., 200 So.2d 84, decided by us this day, the judgment of the trial court in favor of defendant, Southern Farm Bureau Casualty Insurance Co. and against the plaintiffs granting summary judgment, with prejudice, is reversed.

It is further ordered that the judgment in favor of the third party defendant, Southern Farm Bureau Casualty Insurance Co., and against third party plaintiff, Hymel Store Co. Inc., granting summary judgment, with prejudice, is reversed.

It is further ordered that this matter is remanded to the trial court for further proceedings not inconsistent herewith. Defendant, Southern Farm Bureau Casualty Insurance Company, is condemned to pay all court costs incurred in connection with the motion for summary judgment.

Reversed and remanded.

LANDRY, J., recused.
#### In re ESTATE of Eddie MONTSDEOCA, Deceased. Appeal of Marjorie Elaine HILL.

No. 73-869.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

March 13, 1974.

Appeal dismissed.
#### RELIANCE INSURANCE CO. v. DADE COUNTY.

No. 39384.

Supreme Court of Florida.

March 1970.

Rehearing Denied April 16, 1970.

Certiorari denied without opinion. 230 So.2d 21.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AND CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS ON PAGES TWO AND THREE
OF THE COMPANY'S FORM 10-Q FOR THE YEAR TO DATE AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY
BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                       3,588,954
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               19,221,056
<ALLOWANCES>                                 4,038,540
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            31,398,350
<PP&E>                                      27,787,863
<DEPRECIATION>                               4,840,151
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             123,761,327
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           38,105
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        63,258
<OTHER-SE>                                  71,924,385
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               123,761,327
<SALES>                                      9,090,079
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            26,175,964
<CGS>                                        2,630,645
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               29,893,042
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                             4,086,420
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,572,573
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (3,845,556)
<INCOME-TAX>                               (1,029,544)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (2,816,012)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (2,816,012)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.38)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.38)


</TABLE>
##### 



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO  18 U. S. C. SECTION 1350  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 Date: March 7, 2006
    
    /s/ DAVID E. MEADORDavid E. MeadorExecutive Vice President and Chief FinancialOfficer of The Detroit Edison Company
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with this Quarterly Report of PDK Energy Inc., on Form 10-Q for the Quarter ending April 30, 2013 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Eric Joffe, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify to the best of my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) Such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the nine months ended April 30, 2013, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and April 30, 2013 fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of PDK Energy Inc.



|June 12, 2013 | By: | /s/ Eric Joffe                                                | 
|------------- | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------- | 
|              |     | Eric Joffe                                                    | 
|              |     | Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer               | 
|              |     | (Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer) |
Exhibit 21.1

Subsidiaries



|                                             |  |                             
|-------------------------------------------- |  | ----------------------------
|Name                                         |  | Jurisdiction of
Organization
|Palm Harbor G.P., Inc.                       |  | Nevada                      
|Standard Casualty Company                    |  | Texas                       
|Better Homes Systems, Inc.                   |  | Washington                  
|Palm Harbor Holding, Inc.                    |  | Nevada                      
|Standard Insurance Agency, Inc.              |  | Texas                       
|CountryPlace Mortgage, Ltd.                  |  | Texas                       
|Palm Harbor Homes I, L.P.                    |  | Texas                       
|Magic Living, Inc.                           |  | Nevada                      
|Palm Harbor Marketing, Inc.                  |  | Nevada                      
|Palm Harbor Manufacturing, L.P.              |  | Texas                       
|Palm Harbor GenPar, L.L.C.                   |  | Nevada                      
|Palm Haven Insurance Agency of Florida, Inc. |  | Florida                     
|Palm Harbor Insurance Agency of Texas, Inc.  |  | Texas                       
|Nationwide Homes, Incorporated               |  | Delaware                    
|CountryPlace Acceptance Corporation          |  | Nevada                      
|CountryPlace Acceptance GP, LLC              |  | Texas                       
|CountryPlace Acceptance LP, LLC              |  | Delaware                    
|CountryPlace Funding, Inc.                   |  | Delaware                    
|Palm Harbor Albemarle, LLC                   |  | Delaware
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3202 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3202

   To suspend temporarily the duty on film of polymers of propylene.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 30, 1993

 Mr. Moakley introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To suspend temporarily the duty on film of polymers of propylene.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SUSPENSION OF DUTY.

    Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of 
the United States is amended by inserting in numerical sequence the 
following new subheading:

      

``  9902.39.20  Film of polymers of                        No change        No change        On or before 12/   
                 propylene (provided for                                                      31/97           ''
                 in subheading                                                                                . 
                 3920.20.00)............  Free                                                                  

SEC. 2. EFFECTIVE DATE.

    The amendment made by the first section of this Act applies with 
respect to articles entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for 
consumption, on or after the 15th day after the date of the enactment 
of this Act.

                                 <all>
```