### 29475 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 99 / Thursday, May 22, 2014 / Notices

following nonexertional limitations generally do significantly erode an occupational base: Loss of bilateral manual dexterity (sedentary jobs); constriction of visual field (light and medium jobs); no stooping, and poor balance when standing or walking on uneven terrain. See SSR 96–9p: Policy Interpretation Ruling Titles II and XVI: Determining Capability To Do Other Work—Implications of a Residual Functional Capacity for Less Than a Full Range of Sedentary Work, at *5–6. SSR 83–14: Titles II and XVI: Capability To Do Other Work—
The Medical-Vocational Rules as a Framework for Evaluating a Combination of Exertional and Nonexertional Impairments. SSR 83–10: Titles II and XVI: Determining Capability to do Other Work—The Medical-Vocational Rules of Appendix 2 and SSR 83–12: Titles II and XVI: Capability to
do Other Work—The Medical-Vocational Rules as a Framework For Evaluating Exertional Limitations Within a Range of Work or Between Ranges of Work also provide helpful adjudicative guidance on using the rules and the impact of nonexertional impairments on the exertional occupational base. occupational base is not significantly eroded by non-exertional limitations, the adjudicator may use the Grid rules as a framework, and VE testimony is not required.

In Brock, the ALJ found that Brock retained the ability to perform unskilled work. Pursuant to SSR 85–15, the ALJ
found Brock’s non-exertional limitations
had little or no effect on the occupational base of medium exertional level unskilled work before applying the
framework of Grid rule 203.25 to find
Brock was not disabled.

The Brock Court’s decision differs from our policy because it held that, because the ALJ found Brock had severe mental impairments, ‘‘the ALJ should have consulted a [VE] in determining whether Brock had the RFC to perform other jobs that exist in significant number in the national economy.’’ The holding requires the ALJ to consult a VE before denying a claim at step five of our sequential evaluation process when
the claim involves an individual with a severe mental impairment(s), regardless of whether adjudicative guidance
available in an SSR holds that the resulting nonexertional limitation(s) does not significantly erode the occupational base and application of the applicable Grid rule is appropriate.

Explanation of How We Will Apply the
Brock Decision Within the Circuit

This Ruling applies only to claims in which the claimant resides in Arkansas, Iowa, Minnesota, Missouri, Nebraska, North Dakota, and South Dakota at the
time of the determinations or decision at the initial, reconsideration, and ALJ hearing levels.

In making a disability determination or decision at step five of the sequential evaluation process (or the last step in the sequential evaluation process in continuing disability review claims), we will not rely exclusively on the Grid rules as a framework for decision making when an individual has a severe mental impairment(s). Before we deny a claim for disability benefits at step five (or the last step in the sequential evaluation process in continuing disability review claims) when a
claimant has a severe mental impairment(s), we will produce VE evidence in claims at the hearing level.
For claims decided at the initial and reconsideration levels, we will use evidence from a VS, the Dictionary of Occupational Titles (DOT), or another reliable source of job information, such as the ones listed in 20 CFR 404.1566(d) and 416.966(d).

At the Appeals Council level, the Appeals Council will use this AR to determine whether it was correctly applied at the hearing level. However, when the Appeals Council exercises its authority to issue a corrective unfavorable decision, the Appeals Council may rely on vocational evidence adduced at the hearing.

[FR Doc. 2014–11841 Filed 5–21–14; 8:45 am]

**BILLING CODE 4191–02–P**

**DEPARTMENT OF STATE**

**[PUBLIC NOTICE: 8743]**

**Culturally Significant Objects Imported**
**for Exhibition Determinations: ‘‘The**
**Holocaust’’ Exhibition**

**SUMMARY :**  Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: Pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 (79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), Executive Order 12047 of March 27, 1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 Stat.

2681, et seq.; 22 U.S.C. 6501 note, et

seq. ), Delegation of Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, Delegation of Authority No. 236–3 of August 28, 2000 (and, as appropriate, Delegation of Authority No. 257 of April 15, 2003), I hereby determine that the objects to be
included in the exhibition ‘‘The Holocaust,’’ imported from abroad for temporary exhibition within the United States, are of cultural significance. The objects are imported pursuant to a loan agreement with the foreign owner or
custodian. I also determine that the exhibition or display of the exhibit objects at the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum, Washington, DC, from on or about June 12, 2014, until on or about June 11, 2017, and at possible additional exhibitions or venues yet to be determined, is in the national
interest. I have ordered that Public
Notice of these Determinations be published in the Federal Register

. **FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT :**  For further information, including a list of the exhibit objects, contact Julie Simpson, Attorney-Adviser, Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State (telephone: 202–632–6467). The mailing address is U.S. Department of State, SA–5, L/PD, Fifth Floor (Suite 5H03), Washington, DC 20522–0505.

Dated: May 15, 2014. Kelly Keiderling, Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary, Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs, Department of State.

[FR Doc. 2014–11907 Filed 5–21–14; 8:45 am]

**BILLING CODE 4710–05–P**

**DEPARTMENT OF STATE**

**[Public Notice 8741]**

**Culturally Significant Objects Imported**
**for Exhibition Determinations: ‘‘Taras Shevchenko: Poet, Artist, Icon’’** 

**AGENCY :**  Department of State.

**ACTION :**  Notice, correction.

**SUMMARY :**  On March 4, 2014, notice was published on page 12261 of the Federal Register (volume 79, number 42) of determinations made by the Department of State pertaining to the exhibition ‘‘Taras Shevchenko: Poet, Artist, Icon.’’
The referenced notice is corrected here to include additional objects as part of the exhibition. Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: Pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 (79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), Executive Order 12047 of March 27, 1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 Stat. 2681, et seq.; 22 U.S.C. 6501

note, et seq. ), Delegation of Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, Delegation of Authority No. 236–3 of August 28, 2000 (and, as appropriate, Delegation of Authority No. 257 of April 15, 2003), I hereby determine that the additional objects to be included in the exhibition ‘‘Taras Shevchenko: Poet, Artist, Icon,’’ imported from abroad for temporary exhibition within the United States, are of cultural significance. The additional objects are imported pursuant to a loan agreement with the foreign owner or
custodian. I also determine that the exhibition or display of the additional objects at the Ukrainian Museum, New York, New York, from on or about June 6, 2014, until on or about November 14, 2014, and at possible additional exhibitions or venues yet to be determined, is in the national interest.
I have ordered that Public Notice of these Determinations be published in
the Federal Register

.


### 29476 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 99 / Thursday, May 22, 2014 / Notices

**FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT :**  For further information, including a list of the imported objects, contact Paul W. Manning, Attorney-Adviser, Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State (telephone: 202–632–6469). The mailing address is U.S. Department of State, SA–5, L/PD, Fifth Floor (Suite 5H03), Washington, DC 20522–0505.

Dated: May 15, 2014. Kelly Keiderling, Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary, Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs, Department of State.

[FR Doc. 2014–11915 Filed 5–21–14; 8:45 am]

**BILLING CODE 4710–05–P**

**DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION**

**Office of the Secretary of Transportation** 

**Requirements for the Secretary of Transportation’s Recognizing Aviation**  **and Aerospace Innovation in Science and Engineering Awards; Amendments** 

**AGENCY :**  Office of the Secretary of Transportation, U.S. Department of Transportation.

**ACTION :**  Reissuance of the announcement of Requirements for the Secretary of Transportation’s RAISE (Recognizing Aviation and Aerospace Innovation in Science and Engineering)
Awards. This notice is identical to the April 7, 2014 notice announcing the 2014 competition (located at 79 FR 19167) except for a change in the date for submitting expressions of interest. Department of Transportation has
decided that interested students could benefit from more time to develop proposals for the 2014 competition. Thus, we are extending the date for submitting early expressions of interest until September 2, 2014. Students are strongly encouraged to submit outlines of their project proposals, as described below, by that date. The deadline for final submissions remains October 31,

2014.

Authority: 15 U.S.C. 3719 (America COMPETES Act).

Award Approving Official: Anthony Foxx, Secretary of Transportation.

**SUMMARY :**  Pursuant to a recommendation by the Future of Aviation Advisory Committee, the Secretary of Transportation is announcing the third-annual competition to recognize students with the ability to demonstrate unique, innovative thinking in aerospace science and engineering. In its third year, the Secretary has decided to create two divisions within the award: a high school division and a university division (both undergraduate and graduate). The Secretary of Transportation intends to use the awards to incentivize students at high
schools and universities to think creatively in developing innovative solutions to aviation and aerospace issues, and to share those innovations with the broader community.

**DATES :**  Effective on April 01, 2014 to October 31, 2014.

**FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT :**  Patricia Watts, Ph.D., Federal Aviation Administration, (609) 485–5043, patricia.watts@faa.gov, or James Brough, Federal Aviation Administration, (781)

238–7027, james.brough@faa.gov

.

**SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION :**  Subject of Challenge Competition: The Secretary’s RAISE (Recognizing Aviation & Aerospace Innovation in Science and Engineering) Award will recognize innovative scientific and engineering
achievements that will have a significant impact on the future of aerospace or aviation. Following an open solicitation by the United States Department of Transportation (‘‘the Department’’), the Secretary of Transportation (‘‘the Secretary’’) will designate an Award Review Board Chair, who will submit nominations to the Secretary for final consideration. The rules for this competition will be
available at http://www.challenge.gov

. Eligibility

To be eligible to participate in the Secretary’s RAISE Award competition,
students must be U.S. citizens or permanent residents. For the high school division, the students must have
been enrolled in at least one semester (or quarterly equivalent) at a U.S. high school (or equivalent approved home school program) in 2014. For the University division, the student must
have been enrolled in a U.S.-based college or university for at least one semester (or quarterly equivalent) in 2014. Students may participate and be recognized as individuals or in teams.
Each member of a team must meet the eligibility criteria. An individual may join more than one team. There is no charge to enter the competition.

The following additional rules apply: 1. Candidates shall submit a project in the competition under the rules promulgated by the Department;

2. Candidates shall agree to execute
indemnifications and waivers of claims against the Federal government as provided in this Notice; 3. Candidates may not be a Federal entity or Federal employee acting within the scope of employment;

4. Candidates may not be an employee of the Department, including but not
limited to the Federal Aviation Administration, or the Research and Innovative Technology Administration;

5. Candidates shall not be deemed ineligible because an individual used
Federal facilities or consulted with Federal employees during a competition, if the facilities and employees are made available to all individuals participating in the competition on an equitable basis;

6. The competition is subject to all applicable Federal laws and regulations. Participation constitutes the Candidates’ full and unconditional agreement to these rules and to the Secretary’s decisions, which are final and binding
in all matters related to this competition;

7. Submissions which in the Secretary’s sole discretion are determined to be substantially similar to a prior submitted entry may be disqualified;

8. Submissions must be original, be the work of the Candidates, and must not violate the rights of other parties. All submissions remain the property of the applicants. Each Candidate represents and warrants that he, she, or the team, is the sole author and owner of the submission, that the submission is wholly original, that it does not infringe any copyright or any other rights of any third party of which the Candidate is aware, and, if submitted in electronic form, is free of malware;

9. By submitting an entry in this contest, contestants and entrants agree to assume any and all risks and waive any claims against the Federal
Government and its related entities (except in the case of willful misconduct) for any injury, death, damage, or loss of property, revenue or profits, whether direct, indirect, or consequential, arising from their participation in this contest, whether the injury, death, damage, or loss arises through negligence of otherwise. Provided, however, that by registering or submitting an entry, contestants and entrants do not waive claims against the Department arising out of the unauthorized use or disclosure by the agency of the intellectual property, trade secrets, or confidential information of the entrant;

10. The Secretary and the Secretary’s designees have the right to request access to supporting materials from the Candidates;

11. The submissions cannot have been submitted in the same or substantially