alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>
<PAGE> 70
                                                                   
                                                                    Exhibit 23








                           CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS




We  consent to the  incorporation by  reference in  the Registration Statement
(Form S-3 Number 33-47865)  of  American  General  Finance, Inc.  and  in  the
related Prospectus  of our report dated February 14, 1997, with respect to the
consolidated  financial statements  and schedule  of American General Finance,
Inc. and subsidiaries included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for  the year
ended December 31, 1996.


                                                 ENRST & YOUNG LLP


Indianapolis, Indiana
March 18, 1997
<PAGE>
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

## FILED March 7, 2007 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-41198 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus MIGUEL ANGEL RAUDEZ-OROZCO, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 7:05-CR-1025-ALL

-------------------- Before KING, WIENER, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Miguel Angel Raudez-Orozco raises arguments that are foreclosed by AlmendarezTorres v. United States , 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998), which held that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) is a penalty provision and not a separate criminal offense. The Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is
AFFIRMED.
# C_2012107EN.01000101.xml

| 13.4.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 107/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.4.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 107/1

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

12 April 2012

2012/C 107/01

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,3153 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 106,54 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4384 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,82470 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 8,8912 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,2027 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 7,6100 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 24,803 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 296,90 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,6989 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,1802 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,3745 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,3664 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,2645 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,3132 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 10,2128 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,6001 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,6507 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 500,58 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 10,4472 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 8,2961 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,4758 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 12 055,30 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,0360 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 56,176 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 38,7840 |
| THB | Thai baht | 40,564 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 2,4075 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 17,2124 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 67,8550 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,3153

JPY

Japanese yen

106,54

DKK

Danish krone

7,4384

GBP

Pound sterling

0,82470

SEK

Swedish krona

8,8912

CHF

Swiss franc

1,2027

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

7,6100

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

24,803

HUF

Hungarian forint

296,90

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,6989

PLN

Polish zloty

4,1802

RON

Romanian leu

4,3745

TRY

Turkish lira

2,3664

AUD

Australian dollar

1,2645

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,3132

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

10,2128

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,6001

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,6507

KRW

South Korean won

1 500,58

ZAR

South African rand

10,4472

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

8,2961

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,4758

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

12 055,30

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,0360

PHP

Philippine peso

56,176

RUB

Russian rouble

38,7840

THB

Thai baht

40,564

BRL

Brazilian real

2,4075

MXN

Mexican peso

17,2124

INR

Indian rupee

67,8550

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
EXHIBIT
10.33  Date  Name Address City, State Zip Code Country  Dear             :  Pursuant to the terms and conditions of the Veritas DGC Inc. Share
Incentive Plan (the Plan), you have been granted Non-Qualified Stock Options
to purchase              
shares of common stock, $.01 par value, of Veritas DGC Inc. as outlined below.  Granted To:
  
  NameSSNGrant Date:Options Granted:Option Price:
  
  per share
  
  Total Cost to Exercise:
  
  $Expiration Date:Vesting Schedule:
  
  Options to purchase
               shares will be exercisable onOptions to purchase
               shares will be exercisable onOptions to purchase
               shares will be exercisable onOptions to purchase
               shares will be exercisable on  By my signature below, I hereby acknowledge receipt of this grant
letter issued to me under the terms and conditions of the Plan.  I further acknowledge receipt of a copy of
the Plan and agree to conform to all of the terms and conditions of this grant
letter and the Plan.   Signature:
  
  
  Date:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Description of Capital Transaction                               Years ended

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

                                  December 30,   December 31,   December 25,   December 26,   December 28,
                                     1995           1994           1993           1992           1991
                                  ------------   ------------   ------------   ------------   ------------

<S>                               <C>            <C>            <C>            <C>            <C>

Shares issued and outstanding
  December 29, 1990               1,019,781      1,019,781      1,019,781      1,019,781      1,019,781

Acquisition of treasury stock          (462)          (462)          (462)          (462)          (115)
Acquisition of treasury stock        (2,926)        (2,926)        (2,926)        (2,194)         -  
Acquisition of treasury stock        (2,541)        (2,541)        (1,578)         -              -  
Acquisition of treasury stock        (5,334)        (2,622)         -              -              -  
Acquisition of treasury stock          (750)         -              -              -              -  
                                  ---------      ---------      ---------      ---------      --------- 


Weighted average number of
  shares outstanding              1,007,768      1,011,230      1,014,815      1,017,125      1,019,666
                                  ---------      ---------      ---------      ---------      --------- 
                                  ---------      ---------      ---------      ---------      --------- 

</TABLE>                               
                       

Note:

The effects of the treasury stock transactions on the weighted average
number of shares outstanding are Clculated as follows:

1991
----

462 shares times 91 days divided by 364 days equals 115.

1992
----

2,926 shares times 273 days divided by 364 days equals 2,194.

1993
----

2,541 shares times 226 days divided by 364 days equals 1,578.

1994
----

2,934 shares times 280 days divided by 371 days equals 2,215.
2,400 shares times 63 days divided by 371 days equals 407.

1995
----

3,000 shares times 91 days divided by 364 days equals 750.
2,991 shares times 0 days divided by 364 days equals 0.

<PAGE>
<PAGE>
                                                                  EXHIBIT 99 (b)



    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and
(b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), each of the
undersigned officers of Detrex Corporation, a Michigan corporation (the
"Company"), does hereby certify with respect to the Annual Report of the Company
on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002, as filed with the Securities
Exchange Commission on the date hereof ( the "Report") that:

      (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) Information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
          respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
          Company.


March 28, 2003                          /s/ Thomas E. Mark
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Thomas E. Mark
                                        President and Chief Executive Officer


March 28, 2003                          /s/ Steven J. Quinlan
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Steven J. Quinlan
                                        Vice-President -- Finance, Chief
                                        Financial Officer and Treasurer
EXHIBIT 15


Securities & Exchange Commission
450 Fifth Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20549

RE:  Pharmacia & Upjohn, Inc.
     Registration on Form 10-Q

We are aware that our report dated July 29, 1997, on our review of interim
financial information of Pharmacia & Upjohn, Inc. and Subsidiaries for the
three-month and six-month periods ended June 30, 1997 and 1996, included in
this Form 10-Q, is incorporated by reference in the Company's prospectus on
Form S-8 Registration Statement (No. 033-63903) and the prospectus on Form S-8
Registration Statement (No. 333-03109).  Pursuant to Rule 436(c) under the
Securities Act of 1933, this report should not be considered a part of the
registration statements prepared or certified by us within the meaning of
Sections 7 and 11 of the Act.


                                                    Coopers & Lybrand L.L.P.


Chicago, Illinois
August 13, 1997
Exhibit 11


  DEL GLOBAL TECHNOLOGIES CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES

  COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE
  FISCAL YEAR ENDED JULY 31, 1999





                                                                      Per Share
                                            Net Income     Shares       Amount
                                            ----------     ------       ------



      Basic Earnings Per Share:

      Income available to common
        shareholders                       $ 6,671,600    7,683,616      $.87
                                           -----------                   ====



      Effect of Dilutive Securities:

      Warrants                                               13,763

      Options                                               466,939
                                           -----------   ----------

      Diluted Earnings Per Share           $ 6,671,600    8,164,319      $.82
                                           ===========   ==========      ====
**Exhibit 31.4*****CERTIFICATIONS***Mark A. Zorko, certify that:1. I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to Annual Report on Form 10-K of Del Global TechnologiesCorp.;2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4. The Company’s other certifying officer(s) and are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the Company and have: (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the Company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is madeknown to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in whichthis report is being prepared;  (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and proceduresand presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based onsuch evaluation; and  (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the Company’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the Company’s most recent fiscal quarter (theCompany’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal controlover financial reporting; and5. The Company’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Company’s auditors and theaudit committee of the Company’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions): (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operationof internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the Company’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employeeswho have a significant role in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.         Date: November 22, 2006 /s/ Mark A. Zorko       Mark A. Zorko      Principal Accounting Officer  
32
#### Joseph DELLA VALLE, Petitioner, v. Jack WHEELER, Clerk of the Circuit Court in and for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Respondent.

No. 2034.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Fourth District.

April 19, 1968.

Tobias Simon and Beverly Gurevitz, Miami, for petitioner.

Richard M. Sauls, of Thomas, Sturrup, Sauls & Della-Donna, Fort Lauderdale, for respondent.

OWEN, Judge.

Petitioner sought the issuance of an alternative writ of mandamus to require the respondent, as Clerk of the Circuit Court of the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, to perform in accordance with an order entered by the Honorable Douglas S. Lambeth, as Judge of the Court of Record in and for Broward County, Florida. Petitioner, having been indicted for the crime of perjury alleged to have been committed by him while testifying under oath before the 1966 Fall Term Grand Jury of the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit of Florida, obtained from Judge Lambeth an order dated February 21, 1968, directing the respondent to deliver to the court reporter certain notebooks containing testimony before the grand jury, which notebooks were being held by respondent pursuant to the provisions of F.S.1965, Section 905.27, F.S.A. The same order required that the court reporter transcribe the testimony given before the grand jury by petitioner, as well as the testimony of all witnesses testifying before said grand jury concerning the petitioner, with the original of the transcript to be delivered to the court and the copy to the county solicitor and a copy to petitioner’s attorney of record. Respondent notified petitioner’s counsel that due to the questionable jurisdiction of a judge of the court of record over the grand jury records, respondent would be unable to comply with Judge Lambeth’s order until such time as respondent was ordered by the appropriate circuit court judge to relinquish control of the reporter’s notes of the grand jury proceedings.

The petition for alternative writ of mandamus is denied. The petition does not allege and the record before us does not establish that petitioner does not have any other adequate legal remedy. In State of Florida ex rel. Bateman v. O’Toole, Fla.App. 1967, 203 So.2d 527, we settled the question *251of the authority of the judge of the court of record to order the clerk of the circuit court to release the court reporter’s notes of grand jury proceedings. There is no showing made in the petition or in the record before us that petitioner cannot obtain from the Court of Record of Broward County, Florida, enforcement of its order of February 21, 1968. The petition,'not making out a prima facie case for this reason, is denied.

REED, J., concurs.

CROSS, J., agrees to conclusion.
#### Joseph Davis, Inc., Claimant, *v.*State of New York, Defendant.

(Claim No. 31826.)

Court of Claims,

January 5, 1954.

*Samuel D. Magavern*for claimant.

*Nathaniel L.*Goldstein, *Attorney-General (Lawrence H. Wagner*of counsel), for defendant.

Majob, J.

This is a motion made by claimant to transfer the above-entitled claim from the Utica District Calendar to the Buffalo District Calendar. Pursuant to rule 2 of the Court of Claims Rules, St. Lawrence County is in the Utica District.

The request for such change of venue is based on convenience of witnesses.

The claim herein is for $6,947.58 for work, labor and services *performed for*the State upon certain boiler tubes in the St. Lawrence State Hospital, Ogdensburg, St. Lawrence County, New York.

The provisions of the Civil Practice Act concerning change of venue in the Supreme Court are applicable to the Court of Claims. *(Richards v. State of New York,*281 App. Div. 947.) The calendar practice of the Court of Claims is set forth in rule 2 of the Court of Claims Act.

The affidavit submitted on this motion by the claimant, or the reasons advanced by its counsel, are insufficient to order a change of venue under the applicable provisions of section 187 of the Civil Practice Act. Such affidavit is one of generalities *1051and of little help to the court in determining who are necessary-witnesses, or as to their convenience. *(Frenk*v. Katz, 104 N. Y. S. 2d 393; *Richards*v. *State of New York, supra.)*

Claimant’s motion to transfer the claim from the Utica District Calendar to the Buffalo District Calendar is denied. Submit order accordingly.
##### 



Exhibit 32.2 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Vodavi Technology,
Inc. (the Company) for the quarter ended June 30, 2004, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, David
A. Husband, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, to my best
knowledge and belief, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to §
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company. /s/ David A. Husband  
 21
EXHIBIT 23-14

INDEPENDENT AUDITORS CONSENT

We consent to the incorporation by reference of our report dated January 24, 2001 appearing in this Annual Report
on Form 10-K of DTE Energy Company and The Detroit Edison Company for the year ended December 31, 2000 in the
following registration statements:

|                           |  |                     | 
|-------------------------- |  | ------------------- | 
|Form                       |  | Registration Number | 
|                          
|                          
|                          
|                          
|                          
|                          
|                          
|                          
|                          
|                          
|                          
|                          
|                          
|                          
|                          
|                          
|DTE Energy Company        
|                          
|                          
|                          
|                          
|Form S-3                   |  | 33-57545            | 
|                          
|                          
|                          
|                          
|Form S-4                   |  | 333-89175           | 
|                          
|                          
|                          
|                          
|Form S-8                   |  | 333-00023           | 
|                          
|                          
|                          
|                          
|                          
|                          
|                          
|                          
|                          
|                          
|                          
|                          
|                          
|                          
|                          
|                          
|The Detroit Edison Company
|                          
|                          
|                          
|                          
|Form S-3                   |  | 33-53207            | 
|                          
|                          
|                          
|                          
|Form S-3                   |  | 33-64296            | 
|                          
|                          
|                          
|                          
|Form S-3                   |  | 333-65765           | 











Deloitte & Touche LLP

Detroit, Michigan
March 1, 2001