alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>
 
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

                      CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Prospectus 
constituting part of the Registration Statements on Form S-3 (Nos. 333-00164, 
333-16757, 333-19157, 333-24783, 333-26075, 333-27403 and 333-37849 and the 
Registration Statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 33-88974, 33-88976, 33-97000 and 
333-33021) of PMT Services, Inc. of our report dated September 23, 1997, except
as to Note 17 which describes the pooling of interests with Bancard, Inc. which
is as of October 2, 1997, appearing on page 30 of this Form 10-K. We also 
consent to the incorporation by reference of our report on the Financial 
Statement Schedules, which appears on page 65 of such annual report on 
Form 10-K.

PRICE WATERHOUSE LLP

Nashville, Tennessee
September 23, 1997
except as to the pooling
of interests with 
Bancard, Inc. which is 
as of October 2, 1997
Exhibit 23

LOGO

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The Board of Directors

Cooperative Bankshares, Inc.

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements (Nos. 333-92219, 333-22335, and 333-101442) on Forms S-8 of Cooperative Bankshares, Inc. of
our reports dated March 10, 2008, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of Cooperative Bankshares, Inc. and Subsidiary, and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, which reports appear in the
December 31, 2007 annual report on Form 10-K of Cooperative Bankshares, Inc.

LOGO

Greenville, North Carolina

March 10, 2008
Exhibit 32-62
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO  18 U. S. C. SECTION 1350  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 Date: February 18, 2011
    /S/ DAVID E. MEADORDavid E. MeadorExecutive Vice President and Chief Financial
Officer of The Detroit Edison Company
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 20-6925

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

RAYMOND IDEMUDIA AIGBEKAEN,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. 

James K. Bredar, Chief District Judge. (1:15-cr-00462-JKB-2)

Submitted: November 18, 2021 Decided: November 24, 2021

Before MOTZ, WYNN, and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges.

Vacated and remanded by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Raymond Idemudia Aigbekaen, Appellant Pro Se. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Raymond Idemudia Aigbekaen appeals the district court’s order denying his 18 

U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A)(i) motion for compassionate release. Before seeking 

compassionate release in the district court, an inmate must satisfy the threshold requirement 

of 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A). However, as we recently held, this requirement is 

nonjurisdictional and, thus, subject to forfeiture or waiver if not timely raised. See United 

States v. Muhammad, 16 F.4th 126, 129-30 (4th Cir. 2021). 

Here, the district court—which did not have the benefit of our decision in 

Muhammad—erred by sua sponte raising the threshold requirement and denying relief on 

that basis. See id. at 130. Accordingly, we vacate the district court’s order and remand for 

further proceedings. In addition, we deny Aigbekaen’s motions to appoint counsel, to 

supplement the record, to unseal part of the record, to order a limited remand, for release 

pending appeal, to dismiss part of the indictment, and for resentencing. 

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are 

adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process.

VACATED AND REMANDED
U.S. flag
              An official website of the United States government Skip to main content   end of header Census.gov Newsroom Releases 2010 Census
 Newsroom Archive
 Skip left menu navigation
 About the Newsroom
 				Facts for Features
 				**News Releases**
 				Press Kits
 				Tip Sheets
 Release Information CB10-CN.69 **Contact:**  Public Information Office
301-763-3691
 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:  FRIDAY, JULY 30, 2010 Last Day to Ensure You Are Included in 2010 Census Telephone Assistance Line Closes July 30 The U.S. Census Bureau reminded the nation today that on Friday, July 30, it will shut down its toll-free telephone assistance line. More than 130,000 interviews have been completed via the toll free line. Friday is the last day for callers who feel they may have been overlooked in the census to complete their 2010 questionnaire quickly over the phone. “I urge residents that believe they did not receive a form, who did not mail it back or have not been contacted by a census enumerator to call 1-866-872-6868 to ensure they are included in the 2010 Census, making this the best count of the American population to date,” said U.S. Census Bureau Director Robert M. Groves. For more than three months, individuals who believed they weren't included in the census were invited to call the toll-free assistance lines (open 8 a.m. to 9 p.m. and available in English, Spanish, Chinese, Korean, Vietnamese and Russian) to provide their information. July 30 is the last day to take an interview over the toll free line to leave enough time for Census Bureau professionals to process the data and ensure that residents are counted in the right place and prepare the state population counts by the statutory deadline of Dec. 31, 2010. ABOUT THE 2010 CENSUS The 2010 Census is a count of everyone living in the United States and is mandated by the U.S. Constitution. Census data are used to apportion congressional seats to states, to distribute more than $400 billion in federal funds to tribal, state and local governments each year and to make decisions about what community services to provide. The 2010 Census form is one of the shortest in U.S. history, consisting of 10 questions, taking about 10 minutes to complete. Strict confidentiality laws protect the respondents and the information they provide.
  CONNECT WITH US

Information Quality
                    Data Linkage Infrastructure
                    Data Protection and Privacy Policy
                    Accessibility      
                    FOIA
                    Inspector General
                    No FEAR Act
                    U.S. Department of Commerce
                    USA.gov
                   Measuring America's People, Places, and Economy
### Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h

Elizabeth A. Weave r

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathaway,

J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk September 11, 2009

l0831 

# Order

September 11, 2009

138744

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 138744 COA: 282082 Wayne CC: 07-008882-FC LESTER SINGLETON, JR., Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the applicati on for leave to appeal the March 17, 2009 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
#### Helen McMILLAN v. STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTO. INS. CO. et al. Thomas HUTCHINSON v. STATE FARM INSURANCE CO.

No. 60723.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Oct. 26, 1977.

In re: Helen McMillan a/k/a Helen J. Stilley applying for certiorari, or writ of review to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, Parish of Livingston.

Granted.

. It is ordered that the writ of review issue; that the Court of Appeal send up the record in duplicate of the case; and that counsel for plaintiff and defendant be notified.
#### Woodrow EDWARDS v. STATE.

No. 37229.

Supreme Court of Florida.

April 1968.

Certiorari dismissed without opinion. 199 So.2d 795.
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 348

To preserve jobs in the boating industry by amending the Internal Revenue

Code of 1986 to repeal the luxury excise tax on boats.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JANUARY 5, 1993

Mr. SHAW (for himself, Mr. CARDIN, Mr. BONIOR, Mr. TAUZIN, Mr. SUNDQUIST, Mr. BACCHUS of Florida, Mr. CRANE, Mrs. JOHNSON of Connecticut, Mr. HUGHES, Ms. SNOWE, Mr. GOSS, Mr. SHAYS, Mr. MACHTLEY,

Mr. MCCRERY, and Mr. LEVIN) introduced the following bill; which was

referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

A BILL

To preserve jobs in the boating industry by amending the

Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to repeal the luxury

excise tax on boats.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Boating Industry Jobs

5 Preservation Act of 1991’’.
2

•H348 IH

1 SEC. 2. REPEAL OF LUXURY EXCISE TAX ON BOATS.

2 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 4002 of the Internal Rev3 enue Code of 1986 (relating to luxury tax on boats) is

4 hereby repealed.

5 (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENTS.—

6 (1) Paragraph (2) of section 4004(b) of such

7 Code is amended—

8 (A) by striking ‘‘, boat,’’ in subparagraph

9 (A)(iii), and

10 (B) by striking ‘‘, $100,000 in the case of

11 a boat,’’ in subparagraph (B).

12 (2) Paragraph (2) of section 4011(c) of such

13 Code is amended—

14 (A) by striking ‘‘, BOATS,’’ in the heading,

15 (B) by striking ‘‘, boat,’’ in subparagraph

16 (A), and

17 (C) by striking ‘‘a boat or’’ in subpara18 graph (B)(i).

19 (3) Subpart A of part I of subchapter A of

20 chapter 31 of such Code is amended by redesignat21 ing sections 4003 and 4004 as sections 4002 and

22 4003, respectively.

23 (4) Subsection (c) of section 4221 of such Code

24 is amended by striking ‘‘4002(b), 4003(c), 4004(a)’’

25 and inserting ‘‘4002(c), 4003(a)’’.
3

•H348 IH

1 (5) Subsection (d) of section 4222 of such Code

2 is amended by striking ‘‘4002(b), 4003(c), 4004(a)’’

3 and inserting ‘‘4002(c), 4003(a)’’.

4 (6) The table of sections for subpart A of part

5 I of subchapter A of chapter 31 of such Code is

6 amended by striking the last 3 items and inserting

7 the following:

‘‘Sec. 4002. Aircraft.

‘‘Sec. 4003. Rules applicable to subpart A.’’

8 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by

9 this section shall take effect on January 1, 1991.

Æ
## 

Exhibit 12.1

Merrill Corporation       Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fix Charges  (dollars in thousands)

|                                                |  |   |        |   |   |        |   |   |        |   |   |        |   |   |        | Pro Forma |  
|----------------------------------------------- |  | - | ------ | - | - | ------ | - | - | ------ | - | - | ------ | - | - | ------ | --------- | -
|
|
|
|                                                |  |   |        |   |   |        |   |   |        |   |   |        |   |   |        |           |  
|Income (loss) before provision for income taxes |  | $ | 18,706 |   | $ | 32,484 |   | $ | 46,466 |   | $ | 47,671 |   | $ | (8,801 | )         | $
|                                                |  |   |        |   |   |        |   |   |        |   |   |        |   |   |        |           |  
|Fixed charges                                   |  |   |        |   |   |        |   |   |        |   |   |        |   |   |        |           |  
|Cash interest expense                           |  |   | 1,099  |   |   | 4,124  |   |   | 4,321  |   |   | 3,961  |   |   | 12,771 |           |  
|Amortization of deferred financing costs        |  |   |       |   |   | 30     |   |   | 74     |   |   | 64     |   |   | 253    |           |  
|1/3 rent expense from operating leases          |  |   | 1,708  |   |   | 2,003  |   |   | 2,673  |   |   | 3,010  |   |   | 3,722  |           |  
|                                                |  |   |        |   |   |        |   |   |        |   |   |        |   |   |        |           |  
|Total fixed charges                             |  |   | 2,807  |   |   | 6,157  |   |   | 7,068  |   |   | 7,035  |   |   | 16,746 |           |  
|                                                |  |   |        |   |   |        |   |   |        |   |   |        |   |   |        |           |  
|Earnings + fixed charges                        |  | $ | 21,513 |   | $ | 38,641 |   | $ | 53,534 |   | $ | 54,706 |   | $ | 7,945  |           | $
|                                                |  |   |        |   |   |        |   |   |        |   |   |        |   |   |        |           |  
|Earnings to fix charges(1)                      |  |   | 7.7    | x |   | 6.3    | x |   | 7.6    | x |   | 7.8    | x |   |        |           |  

---

---



## QuickLinks
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from financial
statements dated December 31, 1996 and is qualified in its entirety by reference
to such financial statements. *Dollar amounts are based on conversion rate of 
1,530 Lire to the Dollar which prevailed on December 31, 1996.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                        12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                    DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                           $5,412,418
<SECURITIES>                              0
<RECEIVABLES>                    21,935,294
<ALLOWANCES>                        849,673
<INVENTORY>                      21,462,745
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                 54,303,268
<PP&E>                           23,946,405
<DEPRECIATION>                   14,847,059
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                  102,295,425
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>            48,402,614
<BONDS>                          10,763,399
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                     0
<PREFERRED>                               0
<COMMON>                             54,248
<OTHER-SE>                       25,410,458
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>     63,271,895
<SALES>                          63,271,895
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                 63,271,895
<CGS>                            55,009,804
<TOTAL-COSTS>                    14,775,817
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                   (813,825)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                          0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                4,289,542
<INCOME-PRETAX>                  (9,167,974)
<INCOME-TAX>                        388,889
<INCOME-CONTINUING>              (9,804,575)
<DISCONTINUED>                            0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                           0
<CHANGES>                                 0
<NET-INCOME>                     (9,804,575)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                         (2.14)
<EPS-DILUTED>                         (2.14)
        


</TABLE>
p.1 

OAR Box 1828 

Prepped by Ollie Stewart 

Document Number: 

224) ll-K- (I) -37 

Docket Number: 

A-83-27 

Printed 11/12/200811:12:56 AM Sheet 224 of 325 
P.2 

II-K-CJO-37 

TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT REPORT FOR INDUSTRIAL BOILER 

APPLICATIONS: FLUE GAS DESULFURIZATION. 

Radian Corporation. 

November 1979. 

THIS INFORMATION CAN BE FOUND IN DOCKET A-79-02, ITEM 

II-K-(I)-37
#### Louise B. McMULLEN and Margaret B. Webber, Petitioners, v. RAMSEY STOCK FARMS, INC., etc. and V. E. Whitehurst & Sons, Inc., etc., Respondents.

No. 43452.

Supreme Court of Florida.

April 12, 1973.

Certiorari denied. 272 So.2d 844.

CARLTON, C. J., and ROBERTS, ADKINS and DEKLE, JJ., concur.

ERWIN, J., dissents.
Figure 2.

Behavioral Risk Factors for Population Aged 50 and Over by Sex: 2007-2010
(In percent. Data based on sample. For information on confidentiality protection, sampling error, nonsampling
error, and definitions, see www.who.int/healthinfo/systems/sage/)

(HB Male current smoker [ Male past smoker
WM Female current smoker [])) Female past smoker

China

Ghana

India

Mexico

Russia

South
Africa

T T T T T 1
Oo 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80

(HB Male heavy drinker [9 Male nonheavy drinker
fl Female heavy drinker (4) Female nonheavy drinker

China

Ghana

India

Mexico

Russia

South
Africa

T T T T T T T 1
oO 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80

Note: Smoker is defined as tobacco user who may smoke, snuff, or chew tobacco products. Heavy drinking is defined as five or
more standard drinks per day for men and four or more standard drinks per day for women.

Source: Study on Global Ageing and Adult Health (SAGE), 2007-2010.
EXHIBIT 32.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report of PDK Energy Inc. (the "Registrant") on Form 10-Q for the period ending April 30, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Eric Joffe, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge: (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.  /s/ Eric JoffeEric Joffe
Chief Executive Officer and
Chief Financial Officer(Principal Executive Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)  Dated:  June 8, 2011
1 The Honorable Ronald E. Longstaff, United States District Judge for the Southern District of Iowa. 

## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 03-1011

___________ United States of America, * * Appellee, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the Southern * District of Iowa. Steven Curtis McIntosh, * * [PUBLISHED] Appellant. *

___________ Submitted: May 23, 2003 Filed: May 29, 2003

___________ Before MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, BYE, and RILEY, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Steven Curtis McIntosh appeals the district court’s 1 judgment denying his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion as untimely. The district court granted a certificate of appealability on the issue whether equitable tolling should extend the limitations period in this case.-2- Mr. McIntosh’s conviction became final upon completion of direct review when the Supreme Court denied certiorari on May 14, 2001, and he had one year from that date to file his section 2255 motion. See 28 U.S.C. § 2255(1)-(4) (absent impediment created by governmental action, newly recognized right, or newly discovered facts, one-year period of limitation runs from date on which judgment of conviction becomes final); Sweet v. Delo , 125 F.3d 1144, 1155 (8th Cir. 1997) (Supreme Court’s denial of certiorari fixes point of finality of conviction), cert. denied , 523 U.S. 1010 (1998); see also United States v. Marcello , 212 F.3d 1005, 1008 (7th Cir.) (conviction became final, thus triggering one-year limitations period for § 2255 motion, on date Supreme Court denied certiorari petition following direct appeal, and not on date denial of certiorari was filed and docketed with court of appeals), cert. denied , 531 U.S. 878 (2000); Adams v. United States , 173 F.3d 1339, 1342-43 (11th Cir. 1999) (per curiam) (without deciding point at which conviction becomes final, holding that appellate court’s receipt of denial of certiorari does not fix finality). At the earliest, Mr. McIntosh filed his motion on May 29, 2002, seeMoore v. United States , 173 F.3d 1131, 1135 (8th Cir. 1999) (extending application of prisonmailbox rule to pro se § 2255 motions), believing it was not due until June 22, 2002, a year after the district court docketed the Supreme Court’s denial of certiorari. Because we agree with the district court that equitable tolling based on Mr. McIntosh’s mistake about the deadline is not warranted, we affirm. See CrossBey v. Gammon , 322 F.3d 1012, 1015-16 (8th Cir. 2003) (unrepresented prisoner’s lack of legal knowledge does not support equitable tolling); Jihad v. Hvass , 267 F.3d 803, 805-06 (8th Cir. 2001) (equitable tolling affords otherwise time-barred petitioner exceedingly narrow window of relief; equitable tolling is proper only when extraordinary circumstances beyond prisoner’s control make it impossible to file petition on time).-3- A true copy.

Attest:
CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
Exhibit 31.1
 Certification of Chief Executive Officer  Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
 I, Timothy K. Zimmerman, certify that:1.
    
    I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Standard Financial Corp.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 a)
    
    designed such disclosure controls and procedures or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is
made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared;b)
    
    evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report
based on such evaluation;c)
    
    disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter
(the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants
internal control over financial reporting;
 5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
 a)
    
    all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely
affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; andb)
    
    any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
who have a significant role in registrants internal control over financial reporting.
 Date February 11, 2011
    /s/ Timothy K. ZimmermanTimothy K. Zimmerman 29