alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>   1

                                                                   EXHIBIT 24(g)


                                POWER OF ATTORNEY

         KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS that the undersigned director of United
Dominion Industries Limited hereby constitutes and appoints Richard L. Magee and
William Dries and each of them singly, his true and lawful attorney-in-fact and
agent, with full power of substitution and resubstitution, for him and in his
name, place and stead, in any and all capacities, to sign the Annual Report on
Form 10-K of United Dominion Industries Limited for the year ended December 31,
1999, and any or all amendments and supplements thereto, and to file the same
with all exhibits thereto and other documents in connection therewith, with the
Securities and Exchange Commission, the New York Stock Exchange, the Toronto
Stock Exchange and any Canadian securities commissions, granting unto said
attorney-in-fact and agent full power and authority to do and perform each and
every act and thing requisite and necessary to be done in and about the
premises, as fully to all intents and purposes as he might or could do in
person, hereby ratifying and confirming all that said attorney-in-fact and agent
may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.

  /s/ J. A. Grant
-----------------------------------
      J. A. Grant, Director



    February 11, 2000
560 S.E.2d 924

#### M. MORGAN CHERRY AND ASSOCIATES, LTD., Appellant, v. Natalie W. CHERRY, Appellee.

Record No. 2854-00-4.

Court of Appeals of Virginia.

March 26, 2002.

Before: FITZPATRICK, C.J., and BENTON, WILLIS, ELDER, BRAY, ANNUNZIATA, BUMGARDNER, FRANK, HUMPHREYS, CLEMENTS and AGEE, JJ.

*11UPON A PETITION FOR REHEARING EN BANC

On February 5, 2002 came the appellant, by counsel, and filed a petition praying that the Court set aside the judgment rendered herein on January 22, 2002, and grant a rehearing *en banc*thereof.

On consideration whereof, the petition for rehearing *en banc*is granted, the mandate entered herein on January 22, 2002 is stayed pending the decision of the Court *en banc,*and the appeal is reinstated on the docket of this Court.

The parties shall file briefs in compliance with Rule 5A:35. The appellant shall attach as an addendum to the opening brief upon rehearing *en banc*a copy of the opinion previously rendered by the Court in this matter. It is further ordered that the appellant shall file with the clerk of this Court twelve additional copies of the appendix previously filed in this case.
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 3356

To designate the United States courthouse under construction at 611 Broad

Street, in Lake Charles, Louisiana, as the ‘‘Edwin Ford Hunter, Jr.,

United States Courthouse’’.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

OCTOBER 26, 1993

Mr. HAYES introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee

on Public Works and Transportation

A BILL

To designate the United States courthouse under construction at 611 Broad Street, in Lake Charles, Louisiana,

as the ‘‘Edwin Ford Hunter, Jr., United States Courthouse’’.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

4 The United States courthouse under construction at

5 611 Broad Street, in Lake Charles, Louisiana, shall be

6 known and designated as the ‘‘Edwin Ford Hunter, Jr.,

7 United States Courthouse’’.
2

•HR 3356 IH

1 SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

2 Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document,

3 paper, or other record of the United States to the court4 house referred to in section 1 shall be deemed to be a ref5 erence to the ‘‘Edwin Ford Hunter, Jr., United States

6 Courthouse’’.

Æ
Background 

ENCLOSURE 1 

San Joaquin Valley Paved Road Dust Calculation for PM2.5 

Based on EMFAC2011 VMT Growth 

The San Joaquin Valley 2012 PM2.5 Plan (Plan) was adopted by the Air District on 

December 2012 and approved by the Air Resources Board (ARB) as a revision to the 

California State Implementation Plan on January 24, 2013, and submitted to the 

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (U.S. EPA) on March 4, 2013. 

Subsequently, U.S. EPA requested that paved road dust emissions be based on VMT 

data instead of centerline miles. This minor accounting change does not impact the 

attainment demonstration for 2019 or the NOx Reasonable Further Progress (RFP) 

demonstration contained in the Plan. In addition, there is no impact on the 

transportation conformity budgets. 

Analysis 

Table 1 compares the 2014, 2017, and 2019 wintertime PM2.5 emissions for paved 

road dust from the Plan and the updated calculation including VMT growth based on 

EMFAC2011. The winter season paved road dust emissions are shown because 

PM2.5 concentrations measured in the San Joaquin Valley are highest in the winter 

months, as documented in the Plan. 

Year 

2014 

2017 

2019 

Table 1. San Joaquin Valley Winter PM2.5 Emissions 

2012 PM2.5 Plan vs. Updated Calculation 

Projected Emissions (tpd) 

2012 PM2.5 Plan Updated Calculation 

Paved Road Total Direct Paved Road Total Direct 

Dust PM2.5 Dust PM2.5 

4.5 64.4 4.5 64.7 

4.5 63.5 4.7 64.0 

4.5 64.0 4.8 64.6 

The new paved road dust emissions in 2014, 2017, and 2019 increase by zero, 0.2, and 

0.3 tons per day (tpd) respectively over the 4.5 tpd assumed in the Plan for the same 

years. This minor accounting change does not impact the attainment demonstration for 

2019. Total geologic emissions were reported to be 2 to 5 percent of PM2.5 and shown 

to contribute a maximum of 5 percent on peak days. The RFP demonstration contained 

in the Plan was only for NOx and is not impacted. 

The Plan includes transportation conformity budgets for 2014, 2017, and 2019. These 

budgets do not include paved road dust which was determined to be insignificant. The 
updated calculation does not impact the insignificance determination or transportation 

conformity budgets contained in the Plan as submitted. 

Conclusion 

The minor accounting change to paved road dust emissions for the Plan to replace 

centerline mile growth with VMT growth does not impact the attainment demonstration 

for 2019, the NOx RFP demonstration, or transportation conformity budgets contained 

in the Plan.
DearSirorMadam,

IamwritingtoaddmysupporttotheSection333ExemptionPetitionbeingfiledbyThomasLandecker.Iama

privatepilot,licensenumber1872788,andhavebeenflyingforover40years.Myexperiencerangesfromhang

gliders,paragliders,ultralights,andnow3axisaircraft.IflyinandoutofTheSeaRanchairfieldover160times

peryear.IamthecurrentPresidentofTheSeaRanchFlyingSociety,alocalflyingclubwithover300members.

KnowingCA51andthelargersurroundingarea,IhavereadMr.Landecker’sproposalandfindittobewell

thoughtoutandonethatwouldnotadverselyaffectsafetyinthearea.AsUAbecomemorenumerousandlocal

pressureincreasestoutilizedronetechnologycommercially,itbecomesincreasinglyimportanttohaveasafe,

legalalternativetounlicensedoperators.IbelieveMr.LandeckerwillbeanexcellentlicensedoperatorandIurge

theFAAtoapprovehisrequest.

Ifyouhaveanyquestions,pleasefeelfreetocalloremail.Myemailaddressisjdewildeer@earthlink.net.Myland

lineis(707)785-2764.Andcellphoneis(707)367-2544.

Sincerely,

JamesF.DeWilder

President,theSeaRanchFlyingSociety

The Sea Ranch Association • POB 16 • 975 Annapolis Rd.• The Sea Ranch,CA 95497
```

[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 91 (Monday, May 12, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 27031]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-10886]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

Tenth Meeting: RTCA Special Committee 227, Standards of 
Navigation Performance

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), U.S. Department of 
Transportation (DOT).

ACTION: Meeting Notice of RTCA Special Committee 227, Standards of 
Navigation Performance.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FAA is issuing this notice to advise the public of the 
tenth meeting of the RTCA Special Committee 227, Standards of 
Navigation Performance

DATES: The meeting will be held June 16, 2014 from 9:00 a.m.-4:30 p.m.

ADDRESSES: RTCA Headquarters, 1150 18th Street NW., Suite 910, 
Washington, DC 20036.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: The RTCA Secretariat, 1150 18th Street 
NW., Suite 910, Washington, DC 20036, or by telephone at (202) 330-0662 
or (202) 833-9339, fax at (202) 833-9434, or Web site at http://www.rtca.org. In addition, Sophie Bousquet may be contacted directly at 
email: sbousquet@rtca.org.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant to section 10(a)(2) of the Federal 
Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463, 5 U.S.C., App.), notice is 
hereby given for a meeting of Special Committee 227. The agenda will 
include the following:

June 16, 2014

 Welcome/Introductions/Administrative Remarks
 Agenda Overview
 Overview of Planned Work Program for the Week
    [cir] MASPS DO-236C Change 1 FRAC Resolution
    [cir] MOPS Rev DO-283 Change Proposals
 Plenary Review--MASPS/MOPS (all week)
    [cir] Planned Work Schedule (Note, schedule subject to change based 
upon progress/pace/issue)
    [cir] Review/Release of Change 1 to DO-236C
    [cir] 9:00 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. each day
 Technical Requirements Breakout Sessions (as needed)
 Other Business

    Attendance is open to the interested public but limited to space 
availability. With the approval of the chairman, members of the public 
may present oral statements at the meeting. Persons wishing to present 
statements or obtain information should contact the person listed in 
the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section. Members of the public may 
present a written statement to the committee at any time.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on May 5, 2014.
Paige Williams,
Management Analyst, NextGen, Business Operations Group, Federal 
Aviation Administration.
[FR Doc. 2014-10886 Filed 5-9-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
```
|EXHIBIT 23
|----------

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statement on Form S-3 (Nos. 333-85907, 33-56965, 333-16869 and 333-04971) and in the
Registration Statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 333-67175, 333-67173, 333-25837, 33-39529,
33-50369, 33-52699, 333-76935, 333-57504, 333-57506 and 333-52018) of Crown Cork & Seal
Company, Inc of our report dated March 14, 2001 relating to the financial statements,
which appears in the Annual Report to Shareholders, which is incorporated in this Annual
Report on Form 10-K. We also consent to the incorporation by reference of our report
dated March 14, 2001 relating to the financial statement schedules, which appears in this
Form 10-K.

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Philadelphia, PA
March 30, 2001

---
# C_2013187EN.01001301.xml

| 29.6.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 187/13 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.6.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 187/13

---

Call for proposals under the 2013 work programmes of the seventh framework programme for research, technological development and demonstration activities

2013/C 187/11

Notice is hereby given of the launch of a call for proposals under the 2013 ‘Cooperation’ work programme of the seventh framework programme for research, technological development and demonstration activities (2007 to 2013).

Proposals are invited for the following call. Call deadlines and budget are given in the call text, which is published on the relevant European Commission website.

‘Cooperation’ specific programme:

‘Cooperation’ specific programme:

| Theme | Call identifier |
| --- | --- |
| 2. | Food, agriculture and fisheries and biotechnology |

Theme

Call identifier

2.

Food, agriculture and fisheries and biotechnology

FP7-KBBE-2013-FEEDTRIALS

This call for proposals relates to the work programme adopted by Commission Decision C(2012) 4536 of 9 July 2012 as amended by Commission Decision C(2013) 3953 of 27 June 2013.

Information on the modalities of the call, the work programme, and the guidance for applicants on how to submit proposals is available through the relevant European Commission website (http://ec.europa.eu/research/participants/portal).

---
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TORULE 13a-14(b) UNDER THE EXCHANGE ACT 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of North American Scientific,Inc. (“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending July 31, 2003, as filedwith the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),we, L. Michael Cutrer, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Companyand, Alan I. Edrick, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, to thebest of our knowledge, pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) under the Securities ExchangeAct of 1934 and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 ofthe Sarbanes–Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)                                  TheReport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange of 1934; and

 

(2)                                  Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| Date:  August  29, 2003 | By:    | /s/ L. Michael Cutrer   |
|------------------------------|--------|-------------------------|
|                         |   | L. Michael Cutrer       |
|                         |   | Chief Executive Officer |
|                         |   |
| Date:  August  29, 2003 | By:    | /s/ Alan I. Edrick      |
|                         |   | Alan I. Edrick          |
|                         |   | Chief Financial Officer |

 

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE WET
SEAL, INC. CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AND CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          FEB-03-2001
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-30-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUL-29-2000
<CASH>                                      34,598,000
<SECURITIES>                                43,643,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                4,607,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                 44,212,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           102,141,000
<PP&E>                                     162,704,000
<DEPRECIATION>                              80,158,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             229,661,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       75,551,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     1,381,000
<OTHER-SE>                                 139,582,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               229,661,000
<SALES>                                    258,794,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           258,794,000
<CGS>                                      195,085,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               61,305,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                         (1,986,000)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              4,390,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                 1,712,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          2,678,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 2,678,000
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.21
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.21


</TABLE>
# C_2017399EN.01021701.xml

| 24.11.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 399/217 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.11.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 399/217

---

P8_TA(2015)0432

EU-Saint Vincent and the Grenadines agreement on the short-stay visa waiver ***

European Parliament legislative resolution of 15 December 2015 on the draft Council decision on the conclusion, on behalf of the European Union, of the Agreement between the European Union and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines on the short-stay visa waiver (07191/2015 — C8-0148/2015 — 2015/0061(NLE))

(Consent)

(2017/C 399/37)

The European Parliament,

The European Parliament

| — | having regard to the draft Council decision (07191/2015), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the draft Council decision (07191/2015),

| — | having regard to the draft Agreement between the European Union and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines on the short-stay visa waiver (07115/2015), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the draft Agreement between the European Union and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines on the short-stay visa waiver (07115/2015),

| — | having regard to the request for consent submitted by the Council in accordance with Article 77(2)(a) and Article 218(6), second subparagraph, point (a)(v), of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (C8-0148/2015), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the request for consent submitted by the Council in accordance with Article 77(2)(a) and Article 218(6), second subparagraph, point (a)(v), of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (C8-0148/2015),

| — | having regard to Rule 99(1), first and third subparagraphs, Rule 99(2) and Rule 108(7) of its Rules of Procedure, |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to Rule 99(1), first and third subparagraphs, Rule 99(2) and Rule 108(7) of its Rules of Procedure,

| — | having regard to the recommendation of the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs (A8-0325/2015), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the recommendation of the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs (A8-0325/2015),

| 1. | Gives its consent to conclusion of the agreement; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Gives its consent to conclusion of the agreement;

| 2. | Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council, the Commission and the governments and parliaments of the Member States and of Saint Vincent and the Grenadines. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council, the Commission and the governments and parliaments of the Member States and of Saint Vincent and the Grenadines.

---
#### Elizabeth McDANIEL, as the mother of Mary McDaniel, deceased, Appellant, v. Avelino A. MENDEZ, Appellee.

No. 66-608.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Third District.

April 18, 1967.

*76Norman Miller, Miami, and Marvin L. .Lessne, Fort Lauderdale, for appellant.

Louis H. Stallman, Miami Beach, for appellee.

Before PEARSON, BARKDULL and SWANN, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant seeks review of a final order of the trial court, dismissing with prejudice her complaint seeking damages in a tort action.

The deceased daughter of the appellant was playing with the appellee’s daughter on a couch, located on the concrete [or terrazzo] floor of the carport of appellee’s residence. While engaged in such play, the deceased fell from the couch striking her head on the hard surface of the floor. As a result of the injuries, the child died. The appellant brought the instant action seeking damages, alleging negligence on the part of the appellee and/or the creation of an attractive nuisance by the appellee. The appellee moved to dismiss the complaint and the court entered the order appealed, dismissing the complaint with prejudice after opportunity for amendment was declined. We affirm.

The deceased was a licensee on the defendant’s premises. See: Goldberg v. Straus, Fla.1950, 45 So.2d 883; Lowery v. Rosenberg, Fla.App.1962, 147 So.2d 321. The couch was not inherently dangerous nor a trap, nor was it maintained in such manner so as to create a dangerous condition, and did not constitute an attractive nuisance. See: Miller v. Guernsey Construction Company, Fla.App.1959, 112 So.2d 55; Edwards v. Maule Industries, Inc., Fla.App.1962, 147 So.2d 5; 23 Fla.Jur., Negligence, § 63.

Therefore, the final order here under review is hereby affirmed.

Affirmed.
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 2-10-369-CR

FRANCISCO JAVIER MENJIVAR APPELLANT

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS STATE

----------

FROM THE 396TH DISTRICT COURT OF TARRANT COUNTY

----------

MEMORANDUM OPINION1 AND JUDGMENT

----------

We have considered appellant=s “Motion To Dismiss Appeal.@ The motion

complies with rule 42.2(a) of the rules of appellate procedure. Tex. R. App. P.

42.2(a). No decision of this court having been delivered before we received this 

motion, we grant the motion and dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.2(a), 

43.2(f). 

PER CURIAM

PANEL: MCCOY, MEIER, and GABRIEL, JJ.

DO NOT PUBLISH

Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b)

 

1See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.
DELIVERED: September 30, 2010
Appellants have filed a "Motion for Determination of Final

Order," recognizing a potential jurisdictional defect and asking this court to clarify whether the order designated in their notice of appeal is substantively appealable. Respondents have filed a response.

Having considered the motion and the response, we conclude that the order awarding attorney fees is not substantively appealable because no final judgment has been entered in the district court action and the order is not appealable under any statute or court rule. 

### See NRAP 3A(b)(1) (identifying orders and judgments that are substantively appealable); 

### Lee v. GNLV Corp., 116 Nev. 424, 426, 996 P.2d 416, 417 (2000) (explaining that a final judgment is one that disposes of all issues presented in the case, leaving nothing for the future consideration of the district court, except for post-judgment issues such as attorney fees and costs). Accordingly, because we lack jurisdiction over this appeal, 

### see Taylor Constr. Co. v. Hilton Hotels, 100 Nev. 207, 209, 678 P.2d 1152, 1153 (1984) (providing that this court has jurisdiction to consider an appeal only when the appeal is authorized by statute or court rule), we

ORDER this appeal DISMISSED.'

'In light of this order, we deny as moot appellants' February 15, 2013, motion to extend certain deadlines.

SUPREME COURT

OF NEVADA
(0) 1947A 2cc: Ninth Judicial District Court Dept. 1 Dyer, Lawrence, Penrose, Flaherty, Donaldson & Prunty Matuska Law Offices, Ltd. Thomas J. Hall Attorney General/Carson City Douglas County Clerk

SUPREME COURT

OF NEVADA
(0) I947A 3