alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Raymond BOOKOUT, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. T-265.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Nov. 6, 1973.

Rehearing Denied Dec. 12, 1973.

Brooks Taylor, Crestview, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., and Carolyn M. Smurkowski, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

*663PER CURIAM.

Appellant seeks reversal of his conviction in a jury trial on charges of breaking and entering with intent to commit a felony and possession of burglary tools for which he was sentenced to two concurrent three year terms of imprisonment.

We have reviewed the record on appeal and the briefs filed herein and our consideration thereof requires a conclusion that no error was committed in the trial court. Accordingly, the judgment herein is affirmed.

WIGGINTON, Acting C. J., and JOHNSON and SPECTOR, JJ., concur.
ex10a.htm
















Exhibit (10)(a)

















Consent of Ernst & Young LLP, Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm












We consent to the reference to our firm under the caption “Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm” in Post-Effective Amendment No. 13 to the 1933 Act Registration Statement (Form N-4 No. 333-186895) and Amendment No. 366 to the 1940 Act Registration Statement (Form N-4 No. 811-09763), and to the use therein of our reports dated (a) March 31, 2016, with respect to the financial statements of Lincoln Life & Annuity Company of New York and (b) April 12, 2016, with respect to the financial statements of Lincoln New York Account N for Variable Annuities for the interests in a separate account under individual flexible payment deferred variable annuity contracts.







/s/ Ernst & Young LLP


 


Philadelphia, Pennsylvania


November 16, 2016
# C_2017265EN.01015801.xml

| 11.8.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 265/158 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.8.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 265/158

---

P8_TA(2015)0239

Nomination of a Member of the Court of Auditors — Bettina Michelle Jakobsen

European Parliament decision of 7 July 2015 on the nomination of Bettina Michelle Jakobsen as a Member of the Court of Auditors (C8-0122/2015 — 2015/0803(NLE))

(Consultation)

(2017/C 265/22)

The European Parliament,

The European Parliament

| — | having regard to Article 286(2) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament (C8-0122/2015), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to Article 286(2) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament (C8-0122/2015),

| — | having regard to Rule 121 of its Rules of Procedure, |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to Rule 121 of its Rules of Procedure,

| — | having regard to the report of the Committee on Budgetary Control (A8-0198/2015), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the report of the Committee on Budgetary Control (A8-0198/2015),

| A. | whereas Parliament’s Committee on Budgetary Control proceeded to evaluate the credentials of the nominee, in particular in view of the requirements laid down in Article 286(1) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union; |
| --- | --- |

A.

whereas Parliament’s Committee on Budgetary Control proceeded to evaluate the credentials of the nominee, in particular in view of the requirements laid down in Article 286(1) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union;

| B. | whereas at its meeting of 17 June 2015 the Committee on Budgetary Control heard the Council’s nominee for membership of the Court of Auditors; |
| --- | --- |

B.

whereas at its meeting of 17 June 2015 the Committee on Budgetary Control heard the Council’s nominee for membership of the Court of Auditors;

| 1. | Delivers a favourable opinion on the Council’s nomination of Bettina Michelle Jakobsen as a Member of the Court of Auditors; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Delivers a favourable opinion on the Council’s nomination of Bettina Michelle Jakobsen as a Member of the Court of Auditors;

| 2. | Instructs its President to forward this decision to the Council and, for information, the Court of Auditors, the other institutions of the European Union and the audit institutions of the Member States. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Instructs its President to forward this decision to the Council and, for information, the Court of Auditors, the other institutions of the European Union and the audit institutions of the Member States.

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                             449
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        4
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                        323
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   893
<PP&E>                                             269
<DEPRECIATION>                                     140
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   1,253
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            1,095
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            12
<OTHER-SE>                                     (1,284)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   (1,253)
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                              685
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      685
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 1,897
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 746
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (3,318)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (3,318)
<DISCONTINUED>                                      36
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (3,282)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.39)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.39)


</TABLE>
Facility Name: Cargill, Inc. Date: Permit Writer: Gregg P. Fortunato Source No.: 00045 Date of Last Inspection: Inspector: Gregg P. Fortunato Facility Address:2330 Buoy Street, Memphis, TN 38113

TSP SO2 VOC CO NOx Pb PERC PM10 CO2e HAPS 0045-01TV November 20, 2014 November 20, 2019 1000 41.08 3.43 91.87 NA NA NA NA 41.05 NA 2000 NA 8.76 210.68 NA NA NA NA NA NA 3000 NA 13.15 102.48 NA NA NA NA NA NA 4000 164.71 191.90254.11 49.10 202.59 NA NA 164.71109,275 5000 97.79 9.28 127.33 NA NA NA NA 97.79 NA 6000 3.24 13.14 6.35 37.76 26.28 NA NA 3.00 7,635 7000 2.78 NA 7.36 NA NA NA NA 2.78 NA 8000 65.02 4,009 93.56 2,373 786 NA NA 63.23602,903 9000 7.64 18.69 3.73 29.13 39.42 NA NA 7.64 10,841 10000 73.15 NA 135.24 NA NA NA NA 70.80 NA 11000 4.56 NA 711.60 NA NA NA NA 4.56 NA 12000 0.83 17.75 0.05 1.25 5.00 NA NA 0.83 67 460.84,285.41,744.42,490.21,059.3 NA NA 456.4730,721 >25 >250 >250 >250 >250 >250 NA NA >250>100,000>25 Classification A A A A A GGGG, DDDDD ZZZZY, Db, Dc, DD, GG CHECKif nonattainment status X X 

# EMISSION SUMMARY TABLE

Ref. 9/6/13 Cargill email for CO and VOC (and Appx. 1 of Eval. for non Control Plan Sources of VOC) Permit No. Emission Group ID Expiration Date PSD/NSR Renewal Issue Date Pollutant Allowable (tons per rolling 12-month period) MACT

Ref. 9/6/13 Cargill email for CO and VOC . See Cargill application dated 8/30/10 for NOx emissions. SO2 and TSP from exp. Permit CO emissions: FW based on AP-42, PC see 8/3/09 Cargill submittal, Stoker see 8/6/09 Cargill submittal November 20, 2014 May 2, 2014

YES NESHAP

YES YES >25 NSPS

NOx, VOC, PM10, CO, SO2 497 tons VOC from extraction and 214.62 tons VOC from imported oil refining (See Cargill email dated 9/4/13)

Subparts Pollutants Potential to Emit YES

TOTAL (allowable) Ref. 9/6/13 Cargill email for CO and VOC . See Cargill application dated 8/30/10 for NOx emissions. SO2 and TSP from exp. permit

Emergency Generators/Fire Pump Incorporates 0045-13PC (EP No. 10013)
# C_2014077EN.01000301.xml

| 15.3.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 77/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.3.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 77/3

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

14 March 2014

2014/C 77/03

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,3884 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 140,63 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4633 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,83665 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 8,8676 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,2124 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,3075 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 27,358 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 314,55 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,2423 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,5118 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 3,1040 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,5382 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,5393 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 10,7816 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,6270 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,7569 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 487,99 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 14,9400 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 8,5385 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,6556 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 15 731,14 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,5541 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 62,021 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 50,9305 |
| THB | Thai baht | 44,829 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 3,2849 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 18,4553 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 84,9562 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,3884

JPY

Japanese yen

140,63

DKK

Danish krone

7,4633

GBP

Pound sterling

0,83665

SEK

Swedish krona

8,8676

CHF

Swiss franc

1,2124

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,3075

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

27,358

HUF

Hungarian forint

314,55

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

PLN

Polish zloty

4,2423

RON

Romanian leu

4,5118

TRY

Turkish lira

3,1040

AUD

Australian dollar

1,5382

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,5393

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

10,7816

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,6270

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,7569

KRW

South Korean won

1 487,99

ZAR

South African rand

14,9400

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

8,5385

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,6556

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

15 731,14

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,5541

PHP

Philippine peso

62,021

RUB

Russian rouble

50,9305

THB

Thai baht

44,829

BRL

Brazilian real

3,2849

MXN

Mexican peso

18,4553

INR

Indian rupee

84,9562

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
#### SUN PLASTICS, INC., Appellant, v. INTERNATIONAL IDENTIFIERS, INC., and Associated Grocers of Florida, Appellees.

No. 67-962.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Third District.

Aug. 6, 1968.

Rehearing Denied Aug. 27, 1968.

Koenig & Katz, Ft. Lauderdale, for appellant.

Daisy Richards Bisz and Richard M. Gale, Miami, for appellees.

Before PEARSON, HENDRY and SWANN, JJ.

HENDRY, Judge.

This is an appeal to review a summary final judgment entered in favor of the defendant in an action for breach of contract.

The question for our determination is whether the appellee, Associated Grocers of Florida, Inc., sustained its burden of showing the non existence of any issue of fact, particularly as to the existence of a principal-agent relationship between the appel-lee and its codefendant, International Identifiers, Inc., so as to entitle Associated Grocers to a summary judgment.

The trial court found, in its summary final judgment, that the pleadings, depositions, exhibits and admissions on file in the cause, together with the affidavits of Dan S. Davis, director of store development for appellee, show that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact, and that, on this basis, appellee was entitled to a summary judgment as a matter of law.

Appellee urges affirmance on several counts, one of which is that certain deposi*259tions and interrogatories which were considered by the trial court in arriving at its judgment have not been included in the record on appeal. We find this to be true and, therefore, agree with appellee’s contention.

This court held in Greene v. Hoiriis, Fla.App.1958, 103 So.2d 226, that it is unable to consider a point on appeal requiring review of depositions to determine whether there was an issue of fact presented to the trial judge when it appears that such depositions are not included in the record transmitted to the appellate court. See also: Geiger v. City of Leesburg, Fla.App.1966, 186 So.2d 260.

No reversible error having been made to appear, the judgment appealed is affirmed.

Affirmed.
Exhibit 12-A





Delmarva Power & Light Company





Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges


(Dollars in Thousands)





Year Ended December 31,2001

2000

1999

1998

1997Income before extraordinary item

$
203,409

$
141,816

$
142,179

$
112,410

$
105,709Income taxes


141,810


81,510


95,321


72,276


72,155Fixed charges:Interest on long-term debtincluding amortization ofdiscount, premium and expense


63,765


77,178


77,790


81,132


78,350Other interest


3,388


7,512


6,117


9,328


12,835Preferred dividend requirements of a subsidiary trust


5,687


5,687


5,687


5,688


5,687Total fixed charges


72,840


90,377


89,594


96,148


96,872Nonutility capitalized interest














(208
)Earnings before extraordinary item,income taxes, and fixed charges

$
418,059

$
313,703

$
327,094

$
280,834

$
274,528Ratio of earnings to fixed charges


5.74


3.47


3.65


2.92


2.83





For purposes of computing the ratio, earnings are income before extraordinary
item plus income taxes and fixed charges, less nonutility capitalized interest. Fixed charges consist of interest on long- and short-term debt, amortization of debt discount, premium, and expense, dividends on preferred securities of a subsidiary
trust, plus the estimated interest component of rentals.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-10484 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus TODD WILLIAM GAY, Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:92-CR-494-G-1

- - - - - - - - - - February 21, 2002 Before JOLLY, JONES, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Todd William Gay, federal prisoner # 23676-077, appeals the district court’s denial of his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) motion to reduce his sentence based on Amendment 599 to U.S.S.G. § 2K2.4 (relating to use of a firearm in relation to a crime of violence). Gay argues that the five-year consecutive sentence he received for his conviction under 18 U.S.C. § 924(c), and the presentence report’s five-level enhancement pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 2B3.1(b)(2)(C) for brandishing a firearm, resulted in double counting.No. 01-10484 -2- Because the weapon enhancement applied only to the February bank robbery, which was not the basis for the 18 U.S.C. § 924(c) conviction, there was no double counting/Amendment 599 violation. See U.S.S.G. § 2K2.4, comment. (n.2). AFFIRMED.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                         2,258,858
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  17,316,472
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (4,705,035)
<INVENTORY>                                    4,468,718
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               23,317,084
<PP&E>                                         71,749,178
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (28,715,682)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 82,430,119
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          16,406,831
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       449,894
<OTHER-SE>                                     11,204,757
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   82,430,119
<SALES>                                        66,178,252
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               66,178,252
<CGS>                                          54,426,634
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  54,426,634
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               8,814,680
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             2,113,224
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                823,714
<INCOME-TAX>                                   339,441
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            484,273
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   484,273
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  .11
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  .11
        


</TABLE>
# C_2013260EN.01000101.xml

| 7.9.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 260/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.9.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 260/1

---

2013/C 260/01

Last publication of the Court of Justice of the European Union in the Official Journal of the European Union

Official Journal of the European Union

OJ C 252, 31.8.2013

OJ C 252, 31.8.2013

Past publications

Past publications

OJ C 245, 24.8.2013

OJ C 233, 10.8.2013

OJ C 226, 3.8.2013

OJ C 215, 27.7.2013

OJ C 207, 20.7.2013

OJ C 189, 29.6.2013

These texts are available on:

EUR-Lex: http://eur-lex.europa.eu

---
Neil C. Johnston (Sr.) 

# H A N D ~~ 

# A R E N D A L L Real Estate, Land Use & Timber section L L C L A W Y E R S Direct Dial (251) 694-6247 Direct Fax (251) 544-1618 nj ohnston@handarendall. coin RSA TOWER , 11 NORTH WATER STREET, SIJITE 30200 MOI3ILE, ALABAMA 36602 (251) 432-5511 Post Office Box 123 Mobile, Alabama 36601 ' Facsimile: (251) 694-6375 February 19, 2015

1) VIA UPS OVERNIGHT 2) VIA ELECTRONIC SUBMISSION - REGULATIONS.GOV U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket Operations Attn: Mr. Anthony Foxx Secretary of Transportation West Building Ground Floor, Room w12-140 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE. Washington, DC 20590-001

Re: Application on Behalf of Robert K. Keller, Ph.D. and the Atlantic Coast Conservancy for a Small Unmanned Aircraft System

Dear Mr. Foxx: On behalf of Robert K. Keller, Ph. D. and the Atlantic Coast Conservancy, we submit this Application for Exemptions under Section 333 of the FAA Reform and Modernization Act of 2012 and Part 11 of the Federal Aviation Regulations electronically through regulations.gov

. We have also mailed a signed, Application package for your review. Should you have any questions or require additional information, please contact us at 251-694- 6247.
Y

Neil C:-J1Qhnst9n (Sr.) For the Firm 

# I
Carolyne B. Jones For the Firm

MOBILE■ BIRMINGI-IAM■ ATIIENS■ FAIRI-IOPE
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-6933

ISMAIL MUHAMMAD, a/k/a Wayne Anthony Garrett,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

W. ALVIN HUDSON, Sheriff, Roanoke City Jail;

M. MCMILLAN, Major; D. A. BLEVINS, Captain; R.

D. ADKINS, Lieutenant; SERGEANT RATLIFF; SERGEANT HULL; SERGEANT STUART; LEO B. WATKINS,

Sergeant; TRAVIS CURTIS, Deputy; JAMES TROUT,

Deputy; THE CITY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA,

Defendants - Appellees,

and

CORRECTIONAL MEDICAL SERVICES; CATHY WILLIAMS;

KAREN MILLER, M.D.; CHUCK JENNINGS,

Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western

District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, District Judge.

(CA-95-1231-R)

Submitted: November 19, 1998 Decided: December 2, 1998

Before HAMILTON and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior

Circuit Judge.
2

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Ismail Muhammad, Appellant Pro Se. Robert F. Rider, RIDER, THOMAS,

CLEAVELAND, FERRIS & EAKIN, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Ismail Muhammad appeals the district court’s order denying his

motion for a new trial, Fed. R. Civ. P. 59. Our review of the record and the district court’s opinion discloses no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.

Muhammad v. Hudson, No. CA-95-1231-R (W.D. Va. June 5, 1998). We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED