alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2014113EN.01002401.xml

| 15.4.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 113/24 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.4.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 113/24

---

Notice for the attention of the persons and entities subject to the restrictive measures provided for in Council Decision 2013/183/CFSP concerning restrictive measures against the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea

2014/C 113/04

The following information is brought to the attention of the persons and entities that appear in Annexes II and III to Council Decision 2013/183/CFSP (1) concerning restrictive measures against the Democratic People's Republic of Korea.

1

The Council of the European Union, after having reviewed the list of persons and entities designated in the above-mentioned Annexes, has determined that the restrictive measures provided for in Decision 2013/183/CFSP should continue to apply to those persons and entities.

The attention of the persons and entities concerned is drawn to the possibility of making an application to the competent authorities of the relevant Member State(s) as indicated in the web-sites in Annex II to Council Regulation (EC) No 329/2007 (2), in order to obtain an authorisation to use frozen funds for basic needs or specific payments (cf. Article 7 of the Regulation).

2

The persons and entities concerned may submit a request to the Council, together with supporting documentation, that the decision to include them on the above-mentioned lists should be reconsidered, before 15 January 2015, to the following address:

| Council of the European Union |
| --- |
| General Secretariat |
| DG C 1C |
| Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175 |
| 1048 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |
| e-mail: sanctions@consilium.europa.eu |

Council of the European Union

General Secretariat

DG C 1C

Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175

1048 Bruxelles/Brussel

BELGIQUE/BELGIË

e-mail: sanctions@consilium.europa.eu

Any observations received will be taken into account for the purpose of the Council's periodic review, in accordance with Article 22(2) of Decision 2013/183/CFSP.

---

(1)  OJ L 111, 23.4.2013, p. 52.

1

(2)  OJ L 88, 29.3.2007, p. 1.

2

---
Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed February 28, 2013.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14-12-01094-CV

SANDRA SMITH, Appellant

V.

HOUSTON HOUSING AUTHORITY-IRVINTON VILLAGE, Appellee

On Appeal from the County Civil Court at Law No. 1

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 1022614

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

This is an appeal from a judgment signed December 3, 2012. The notice of 

appeal was filed December 7, 2012. To date, our records show that appellant has 

not paid the $175.00 appellate filing fee. See Tex. R. App. P. 5 (requiring payment 

of fees in civil cases unless indigent); Tex. R. App. P. 20.1 (listing requirements for 

establishing indigence); see also; Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. ' 51.207. 
2

On January 17, 2013, this court ordered appellant to pay the appellate filing 

fee on or before February 1, 2013, or the appeal would be dismissed. Appellant 

has not paid the appellate filing fee. Accordingly, the appeal is ordered dismissed. 

See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(c) (allowing involuntary dismissal of case because 

appellant has failed to comply with notice from clerk requiring response or other 

action within specified time). 

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Christopher, Jamison, and McCally.
EXHIBIT 32.1

                           SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION

         In connection with the quarterly report of Benefit Solutions
Outsourcing, Corp. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended November
30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I,
Jamie Mills, President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. SS. 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.

February 15, 2011                       /s/ Jamie Mills
                                        ---------------
                                        Jamie Mills
                                        President, Secretary, Treasurer,
                                        Principal Executive Officer,
                                        Principal Financial and Accounting
                                        Officer and Sole Director


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
# C_2014053EN.01002701.xml

| 25.2.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 53/27 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.2.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 53/27

---

Notification by Slovenia to the European Commission pursuant to Article 37 of Regulation (EC) No 562/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing a Community Code on the rules governing the movement of persons across borders (Schengen Borders Code)

Amendment to the information provided by Slovenia in the OJ C 18, 24.1.2008

2014/C 53/06

I.   Article 21(c) — Possibility for a Member State to provide by law for an obligation to hold or carry papers and documents

Article 21(c) — Possibility for a Member State to provide by law for an obligation to hold or carry papers and documents

The Republic of Slovenia implemented that obligation in Article 7(1) of the Aliens Act (Uradni List RS (UL RS = Official Gazette of the Republic of Slovenia) No 50/2011), which provides that every alien must have a valid passport to enter, leave or stay in the Republic of Slovenia. The penalty for breaching that requirement is laid down in point 1 of Article 143 of the Act.

Official Gazette of the Republic of Slovenia

II.   Article 21(d) — Obligation on third-country nationals to report their presence on the territory of any Member State

Article 21(d) — Obligation on third-country nationals to report their presence on the territory of any Member State

In Slovenia, the reporting requirement is laid down in Article 10 of the Residence Registration Act (UL RS No 59/2006 and amendments in UL RS No 111/2007). The arrival or departure of an alien staying in a tourist or hotel establishment must be reported by the accommodation provider within 12 hours of the alien's reception or departure. If aliens who do not have a residence permit or a residence registration certificate in the Republic of Slovenia do not stay with an accommodation provider, they must themselves report to the relevant police station within three days of crossing the national border and report their departure when they leave. The penalty for breaching that requirement is laid down in Article 24 of the Residence Registration Act.

III.   Article 4(3) — Penalties for the unauthorised crossing of external borders at places other than border crossing points or at times other than the fixed opening hours

Article 4(3) — Penalties for the unauthorised crossing of external borders at places other than border crossing points or at times other than the fixed opening hours

In Slovenia, a fine is provided for in Article 145 of the Aliens Act (UL RS No 50/2011). The fine laid down for the offence is between EUR 500 and EUR 1 200.

---
<PAGE>

                                                                  Exhibit 23.1



                     CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS


We hereby consent to the use in this Registration Statement on Form S-1 of
our reports dated January 26, 2000 relating to the financial statements and
financial statement schedule of JNI Corporation, which appear in such
Registration Statement. We also consent to the references to us under the
heading "Experts" in such Registration Statement.


PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

San Diego, California
September 26, 2000
EXHIBIT 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with Amendment No. 1 to the Quarterly Report of Plandel Resources, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended November 30, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Mario Santos Gregorio, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:





(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








/s/ Mario Santos GregorioMario Santos GregorioPresident and Chief Executive Officer



October 3, 2012
Order entered July 21, 2014

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-14-00617-CV

CHARLES JONES, Appellant

V.

JAMES P. NEIL, Appellee

On Appeal from the 59th Judicial District Court

Grayson County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. CV-12-2015

ORDER

Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, we DENY as moot appellant’s May 20, 2014 

motion to adopt previously-filed clerk’s and reporter’s record. 

/s/ ELIZABETH LANG-MIERS 

JUSTICE
#### Murray et ux. *v.*Hoffman, Appellant.

Argued October 9, 1934.

Before Trexler, P. J., Keller, Cunningham, Baldbige, Stadteeld, Parker and James, JJ.

*149
      *David Friedman,*and with him *Alexander M. DeHaven,*for appellant.

*Albert L. Moise,*for appellee.

November 22, 1934:

Pee Cxjexam,

There are four separate appeals from two separate actions in trespass brought in the municipal court. They were argued together. Damages were claimed for injuries received in an automobile collision. At the trial the judge in his charge to the jury, without any motion on behalf of the defendant, stated that as to Joseph Murray, one of the plaintiffs, “there is no damage shown for him, therefore, the trial judge will enter a non-suit as to Joseph Murray.” The verdicts rendered in favor of the other plaintiffs were $15 for Florence Murray; $96.82 for Albert J. Murray and $25 for Helen Murray. The court en banc took off the non-suit as to Joseph Murray and granted a new trial to the other plaintiffs for the reason that the verdicts were inadequate. This action of the court is the subject of the present appeal. Defendant argues that as there is a rule of court which provides that a motion to take off a non-suit must be filed within four days *150after the verdict is rendered, the court should not have taken it off. It may be conceded that as a matter of absolute right Joseph Murray had no standing to be heard in his motion to remove the non-suit. The time under the rules had expired. This, however, did not prevent the court to act favorably on the motion if the interests of justice demanded it. We find no abuse of discretion in this. The rules of court are designed to expedite the administration of justice, not to prevent its exercise. Having granted a new trial to the other plaintiffs it was no more than right that Joseph Murray should have the same privilege. The entering of the non-suit, during the delivery of the charge, was improper and although it is.not so stated in the opinion filed by the court en banc, it may have been in its mind that if a motion had been made in the usual way and reasons for it assigned, the plaintiff might have supplemented his proof or at least asked the court to allow him to do so.

The reason for the granting of a new trial was the inadequacy of the verdicts. A reading of the testimony shows plainly that the amount is very small in comparison to the damages sustained. For example, Mrs. Helen Murray was awarded $25. She testified what her injuries were. She suffered with her teeth; she was treated by the doctor a number of times; took a large quantity of aspirin to kill the pain and she was informed by the doctor that she had a kind of tumor; her cheek was black and blue and her face was swollen terribly, she did not go out of the house for ten days and was still at the time of the trial suffering pain in the back of her head. A similar observation could be made as to the other plaintiffs. We find no abuse of discretion in the action of the court.

Nos. 284, 286 and 287; in each the order of the lower court granting a new trial is affirmed. In No. 285, the order taking off the non-suit is affirmed.
#### Herbst, Admx. *v.*Derrick, Appellant.

*206Argued October 2, 1934.

Before Tbexleb, P. J., Kelleb, Cunningham, Baldbige, Stadteeld, Pabkeb and James, JJ.

*209P. *Edward Barenkopf,*and with him *Earry Felix,*for appellant.

*Earry Lapensohn,*for appellee.

November 22, 1934:

Pee Curiam,

The judgment of the lower court is affirmed on the opinion of Judge Parry.
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3391 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3391

To restore eligibility for burial in national cemeteries to unremarried 
                           surviving spouses.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 27, 1993

 Mr. Sangmeister introduced the following bill; which was referred to 
                   the Committee on Veterans' Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To restore eligibility for burial in national cemeteries to unremarried 
                           surviving spouses.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled, That section 2402(5) of 
title 38, United States Code, is amended by inserting ``(which for 
purposes of this chapter includes an unremarried surviving spouse who 
had a subsequent remarriage which was terminated by death or divorce)'' 
after ``surviving spouse''.

                                 <all>
```
#### PEOPLES AMERICAN NATIONAL BANK OF NORTH MIAMI, Appellant, v. Dell J. LOCKWOOD and Dean D. Lockwood, and Saf-T-Clean, Inc., Appellees.

No. 67-521.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Third District.

Feb. 13, 1968.

Rehearing Denied March 4, 1968.

George C. Vogelsang, Miami, for appellant.

Fowler, White, Collins, Gillen, Humkey & Trenam and Fred R. Ober, Miami, for Saf-T-Clean, appellee.

Before PEARSON, BARKDULL and HENDRY, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Winn-Dixie Stores, Inc. v. Fellows, Fla.App.1963, 153 So.2d 45.
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2882 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2882

To amend section 615(e) of the Individuals with Disabilities Education 
  Act to limit the award of attorneys' fees under the section to fees 
incurred for or in connection with the commencement and prosecution of 
                            a civil action.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             August 5, 1993

  Mr. Duncan introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                    Committee on Education and Labor

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend section 615(e) of the Individuals with Disabilities Education 
  Act to limit the award of attorneys' fees under the section to fees 
incurred for or in connection with the commencement and prosecution of 
                            a civil action.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. LIMITATION ON ATTORNEYS' FEES.

    Section 615(e)(4) of the Individuals with Disabilities Education 
Act (20 U.S.C. 1415(e)(4)) is amended--
            (1) by striking subparagraph (B) and inserting the 
        following:
    ``(B) In any civil action brought in a State court or in a district 
court of the United States under this subsection, the court, in its 
discretion, may award reasonable attorneys' fees incurred for or in 
connection with the commencement and prosecution of the civil action as 
part of the costs to the parents or guardian of a child or youth with a 
disability who is the prevailing party.'';
            (2) in subparagraph (C), by striking ``action or 
        proceeding'' and inserting ``civil action'';
            (3) in subparagraph (4)(D)--
                    (A) in the matter preceding clause (i), by striking 
                ``action or proceeding'' and inserting ``civil 
                action'';
                    (B) in clause (i), by striking ``Procedure or,'' 
                and all that follows and inserting ``Procedure.''; and
                    (C) in clause (iii), by striking ``or 
                administrative officer'';
            (4) in clauses (i) and (iii) of subparagraph (F), by 
        striking ``action or proceeding,'' and inserting ``civil 
        action,''; and
            (5) in subparagraph (G), by striking ``action or 
        proceeding'' and inserting ``civil action''.

                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT
      23.1










**Consent
      Of Independent**




**Registered
      Public Accounting Firm**





We
      hereby
      consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on
      Form
      S-8 (No. 333-119849) of WindsorTech, Inc. of our report dated January 28, 2005,
      except as to the restatement discussed in Note 1 to the consolidated financial
      statements, which is as of November 11, 2005, relating to the consolidated
      financial statements, which appears in this Form 10-KSB/A.











/s/
      RubinBrown LLP





St.
      Louis, Missouri


November
      11, 2005
U.S. flag
              An official website of the United States government Skip to main content   end of header Census.gov Newsroom Releases Housing
 Newsroom Archive
 Skip left menu navigation
 About the Newsroom
 				Facts for Features
 				**News Releases**
 				Press Kits
 				Tip Sheets
 Release Information CB12-TPS.32 **Contact:**  Public Information Office
301-763-3030
 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:  THURSDAY, JUNE 14, 2012 State and County Housing Unit Estimates: July 1, 2011 Updated estimates of the nation's housing stock at the national, state and county levels show growth or decline in units since the 2010 Census. Internet address is: <https://www.census.gov/popest/data/housing/totals/2011/index.html>. **No news release associated with this product. Tip Sheet only.**
  CONNECT WITH US

Information Quality
                    Data Linkage Infrastructure
                    Data Protection and Privacy Policy
                    Accessibility      
                    FOIA
                    Inspector General
                    No FEAR Act
                    U.S. Department of Commerce
                    USA.gov
                   Measuring America's People, Places, and Economy
#### Emma TAYLOR, Appellant, v. CITY OF OPA LOCKA, a municipal corporation, Appellee.

No. 70-1206.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Dec. 18, 1970.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> BD
<LEGEND>
The schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the condensed
consolidated financial statements and is qualified in its entirety by reference 
to such financial statements.



               DONALDSON, LUFKIN & JENRETTE, INC. & SUBSIDIARIES

                            Financial Data Schedule
                     (In thousands, except per share data)
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                       1,049,253
<RECEIVABLES>                               10,296,819
<SECURITIES-RESALE>                         20,063,348
<SECURITIES-BORROWED>                       23,967,639
<INSTRUMENTS-OWNED>                         13,668,863
<PP&E>                                         450,706
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              72,282,236
<SHORT-TERM>                                   515,646
<PAYABLES>                                   9,900,383
<REPOS-SOLD>                                35,775,580
<SECURITIES-LOANED>                          7,322,186
<INSTRUMENTS-SOLD>                           8,938,949
<LONG-TERM>                                  3,482,003
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          200,000
<PREFERRED>                                    375,000
<COMMON>                                        12,281
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,540,418
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                72,282,236
<TRADING-REVENUE>                             (92,782)
<INTEREST-DIVIDENDS>                         2,221,309
<COMMISSIONS>                                  853,703
<INVESTMENT-BANKING-REVENUES>                1,461,076
<FEE-REVENUE>                                   91,815
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,455,851
<COMPENSATION>                               2,231,655
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                600,500
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                     600,500
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   370,800
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     2.93
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     2.65
        


</TABLE>
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY WASHINGTO N , D.C. 20460

Ms. Lisa Messinger V ectren Corporatio n I N. Main Street Evansville, Ind i ana 47708 Ms. Messinger: 

## JUL 3 1 2013 OFFICE OF WATER

The U.S. Env ironmental Protection Agency (EPA) has received you r request for plant-specific information, including esti mated compliance co st s and pollutant removals, related to the proposed revisions to the Effluent Limita tions Guidelines and Standards fo r the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Source Category (Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-OW -2009-0819). In response to your request , please find enclosed a disc containi ng one file and si x attachment s for each plant for which costs/removals are being provided . The file and attac hments present the input values and the costs and po ll utant removals for the requested p l ants, as well as additional information regarding EPA's esti mation of these values . The EPA is providing costs and poll utan t removals for the follow ing plants: • A.B. Brown Generating Station (08502); and • F.B. Culley Generation Station (08965). The information provided in the enclosed disc may contain information that was claimed by yo ur company ' s plants as confidential business information (CBI) in response to the Questionnairefor the Steam Electric Power Generating Effluent Guidelines. T he EPA is no t responsib l e for the release of this CBI if you or others in your company provide these attachments to other parties. If you have any quest i ons regarding these estim ates, please contact me at (202) 566- 1755 or alicea.jezebele @epa.gov. Thank you for your interest in the steam electric effluen t guide li nes rulemaking proces s. Sincerely, Jezebele Alicea Virella Engineering and Analysis Division (4303T) Enclosures

Internet Address (U RL ) • http ·/fwww . epa . gov Recycled/Recyclable • P r i nted w1th Vegetable O i l Based I nks o n 100% Postconsumer. Process Ch l ori ne Free Recycled Paper