alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Certification of CEO and CFO Pursuant to
 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
 As Adopted Pursuant to
 Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
 
 In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Firsthand Technology Value Fund, Inc. (the “Company”) for the quarter ended September 30, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), Kevin Landis, as Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:
 
 (1)           The report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 134; and
 
 (2)           The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 /s/ Kevin LandisName: Kevin LandisTitle: Chief Financial Officer and Chief Financial OfficerDate: August 9, 2013
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 2913

To eliminate the retroactive tax increases contained in the Revenue

Reconciliation Act of 1993.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

AUGUST 6, 1993

Mr. ARMEY introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee

on Ways and Means

A BILL

To eliminate the retroactive tax increases contained in the

Revenue Reconciliation Act of 1993.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. ELIMINATION OF RETROACTIVE TAX IN4 CREASES.

5 Notwithstanding any provision of the Revenue Rec6 onciliation Act of 1993—

7 (1) the amendments made by sections 13201,

8 13202, 13203, and 13221 of such Act (relating to

9 individual and corporate income tax rate increases)

10 shall take effect on the date of the enactment of
2

•HR 2913 IH

1 such Act and the provisions of section 15 of the In2 ternal Revenue Code of 1986 shall apply to the rate

3 changes provided by such amendments and such

4 date of enactment shall be treated as the effective

5 date of such changes for purposes of such section

6 15, and

7 (2) the amendments made by section 13208 of

8 such Act (relating to estate and gift tax rates) shall

9 only apply to the estates of decedents dying, and

10 gifts made, after such date of enactment.

Æ
Comment Info: =================

General Comment:I do believe that allowing responsible citizens to participate in commerce using this technology(UAS) will benefit consumers as well s business owners.
well as business owners . Safety concerns are well  founded. Please keep in mind that a business is attempting to generate commerce not spend it.
This reality alone causes business owners to protect their investment. In doing so the public directly benefits from this diligent
effort to keep the tools of the trade intact. 
Thank You for your consideration in this matter.
                                        Michael Starley
# C_2017399EN.01021201.xml

| 24.11.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 399/212 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.11.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 399/212

---

P8_TA(2015)0427

EU-Trinidad and Tobago agreement on the short-stay visa waiver ***

European Parliament legislative resolution of 15 December 2015 on the draft Council decision on the conclusion, on behalf of the European Union, of the Agreement between the European Union and the Republic of Trinidad and Tobago on the short-stay visa waiver (07196/2015 — C8-0151/2015 — 2015/0054(NLE))

(Consent)

(2017/C 399/32)

The European Parliament,

The European Parliament

| — | having regard to the draft Council decision (07196/2015), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the draft Council decision (07196/2015),

| — | having regard to the draft Agreement between the European Union and the Republic of Trinidad and Tobago on the short-stay visa waiver (07129/2015), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the draft Agreement between the European Union and the Republic of Trinidad and Tobago on the short-stay visa waiver (07129/2015),

| — | having regard to the request for consent submitted by the Council in accordance with Article 77(2)(a) and Article 218(6), second subparagraph, point (a)(v), of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (C8-0151/2015), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the request for consent submitted by the Council in accordance with Article 77(2)(a) and Article 218(6), second subparagraph, point (a)(v), of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (C8-0151/2015),

| — | having regard to Rule 99(1), first and third subparagraphs, Rule 99(2) and Rule 108(7) of its Rules of Procedure, |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to Rule 99(1), first and third subparagraphs, Rule 99(2) and Rule 108(7) of its Rules of Procedure,

| — | having regard to the recommendation of the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs (A8-0323/2015), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the recommendation of the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs (A8-0323/2015),

| 1. | Gives its consent to conclusion of the agreement; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Gives its consent to conclusion of the agreement;

| 2. | Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council, the Commission and the governments and parliaments of the Member States and of the Republic of Trinidad and Tobago. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council, the Commission and the governments and parliaments of the Member States and of the Republic of Trinidad and Tobago.

---
Order entered January 12 , 2015

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05
- 14
- 00428
- CR HUGO SILVA, Appellant

V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 4

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cau se No. F12
- 53639
- K



### O RDER
The Court ORDERS the trial court to conduct a hearing to determine why appellant’s brief has not been filed. In this regard, the trial court shall make appropriate findings and recommendations and determine whether appellant des ires to prosecute the appeal, whether appellant is indigent, or if not indigent, whether retained counsel has abandoned the appeal. See
T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 38.8( b ). If the trial court cannot obtain appellant’s presence at the hearing, the
trial court shall c onduct the hearing in appellant’s absence. See Meza v. State , 742 S.W.2d 708 (Tex. App.

– Corpus Christi 1987, no pet.) (per curiam). If appellant is indigent, the trial court is ORDERED to take such measures as may be necessary to assure effective represe ntation, which may include appointment of new counsel.We ORDER the trial court to transmit a record of the proceedings, which shall include

written findings and recommendations, to this Court within THIRTY DAYS of the date of this order. This appeal is ABATED to allow the trial court to comply with the above order. The appeal shall be reinstated thirty days from the date of this order or when the findings are received, whichever is earlier.
/s/ ADA BROWN JUSTICE
amch_Ex10_4


		
			Exhibit 10.4
		

		
			 
		

		
			AMC Entertainment Holdings, Inc. 
		

		
			Non-Employee Director Compensation Program 
		

		
			Summary
		

		
			Revised November 3, 2016
		

		
			Effective January 1, 2017
		

		
			 
		

		
			Each member of the Board of Directors (the “Board”) of AMC Entertainment Holdings, Inc. (the “Company”), including directors that are not independent under the rules and regulations of the New York Stock Exchange and Securities and Exchange Commission but excluding those directors that are employed by the Company, its parent company Dalian Wanda Group Co., Ltd., or their affiliates (the “Non-Employee Directors”), will receive the following annual compensation:
		

			
	
			
				 ·
			

			
	
			
			an annual cash retainer of $150,000;




			
	
			
				 ·
			

			
	
			
			an annual stock award with a value of $65,000;




			
	
			
				 ·
			

			
	
			
			an annual cash retainer of $5,000 for service on each of the Company’s Audit, Compensation, and Nominating & Corporate Governance Committees;




			
	
			
				 ·
			

			
	
			
			an annual cash retainer of $20,000 for service as the chairman of the Company’s Audit Committee; and




			
	
			
				 ·
			

			
	
			
			an annual cash retainer of $10,000 for service as the chairman of each of the Company’s Compensation, and Nominating & Corporate Governance Committees.




		
			Stock awards will be made pursuant to the Company’s 2013 Equity Incentive Plan and issued on the same date annual grants are made to members of the Company’s senior management team.  Non-Employee Directors may elect to receive all or a portion of their annual cash retainers in stock.  The number of shares to be awarded will be determined by dividing the award value by the average closing price of the stock for the five trading days prior to the date of the stock award.  Stock awards must be retained until the earlier to occur of (i) the third anniversary of the date of grant or (ii) the departure of the Non-Employee Director from the Board.   
		

		
			Cash retainers will be paid in four equal installments at the beginning of each calendar quarter.
		

		
			If a director begins service after January 1, the annual cash retainer and the annual stock award will be prorated for the partial year of service.  Cash retainers for committee service need not be pro-rated in the first year of service.
		

		
			Additionally, the Company shall reimburse the Non-Employee Directors for their reasonable out-of-pocket travel and related expenses incurred in connection with their service on the Board.
#### CHESAPEAKE HOUSE, INC., Appellant, v. LEE MUTUAL INSURANCE AGENCY, INC., Appellee.

No. 69-572.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Sept. 11, 1970.

Rehearing Denied Oct. 15, 1970.

A. N. Spence, Miami, for appellant.

Robert T. Shafer, Jr., and James A. Franklin, Jr., of Henderson, Franklin, Starnes & Holt, Fort Myers, for appellee.

MANN, Judge.

An insurance broker is not, as a matter of law, the insured’s agent for receipt of premium refund upon cancellation. Hermann v. Niagara Fire Ins. Co., 1885, 100 N.Y. 411, 3 N.E. 341. Whether the broker is agent as a matter of fact is not determined by the record on which summary judgment was entered. Agency, pleaded here, is yet to be determined. Miller v. Chase & Co., 1924, 88 Fla. 500, 102 So. 553. See 44 C.J.S. Insurance § 168; 44 Am.Jur.2d Insurance § 151 et seq.

Reversed and remanded.

HOBSON, C. J., and LILES, J., concur.
[Deloitte & Touche Letterhead]









INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT



We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration
Statement Nos. 333-10561,  333-28145, 33-65088, and 333-
23623 of John Deere Capital Corporation on Form S-3 of our
report dated November 25, 1997, appearing in this Annual
Report on Form 10-K of John Deere Capital Corporation for
the year ended October 31, 1997, and to the reference to us
under the heading "Experts" in the Prospectuses, which are
part of such Registration Statements.



DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
Chicago, Illinois

January 21, 1998
U.S. flag
              An official website of the United States government Skip to main content   end of header Census.gov Newsroom Releases Miscellaneous
 Newsroom Archive
 Skip left menu navigation
 About the Newsroom
 				Facts for Features
 				**News Releases**
 				Press Kits
 				Tip Sheets
 Release Information CB11-TPS.20 **Contact:**
 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:  THURSDAY, JUNE 30, 2011 Consumer Expenditure Survey Tracks Consumer Spending Since 1979, the Census Bureau's Consumer Expenditure Survey has supplied the nation with household data used to help compute the Consumer Price Index, a key measure of the economy released by the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. In July 2011, the next round of interviews takes place for this quarterly survey. The survey collects information [PDF] on spending for housing, groceries, health care, transportation and other vital goods and services. Internet address: <http://www.bls.gov/cex/>. **No news release associated with this report. Tip Sheet only.**
 
 CONNECT WITH US

Information Quality
                    Data Linkage Infrastructure
                    Data Protection and Privacy Policy
                    Accessibility      
                    FOIA
                    Inspector General
                    No FEAR Act
                    U.S. Department of Commerce
                    USA.gov
                   Measuring America's People, Places, and Economy
***Exhibit 31.1***
***CERTIFICATIONS***
I, Walter F. Schneider, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Del Global TechnologiesCorp.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statementof a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statementswere made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in thisreport, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, theperiods presented in this report; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrantand have:
(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known tous by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this report is being prepared; (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controlsand procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the endof the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’smost recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter inthe case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting; and
5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, basedon our most recent evaluation of internal control over financialreporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of theregistrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):
(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the designor operation of internal control over financial reporting which arereasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability torecord, process, summarize and report financial information; and (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management orother employees who have a significant role in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting.       Date: Octber 29, 2004 /s/ Walter F. Schneider       Walter F. Schneider        Chief Executive Officer
-1-
# United States Court **of Appeals**  **f or the Fifth Circuit** 

**____________** No. 24 - 10152 Summary Calendar

**____________ United States of America,**  Plaintiff
— Appellee **,** versus **Islam Yaser -**  **Abdel Said,** Defendant
— Appellant **.**

**______________________________** Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 4:20 - CR - 292 - 1

**______________________________** Before **Wiener, Ho,** and **Ramirez,** Circuit Judges **. Per Curiam**  **:** ***** The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Islam Yaser Abdel Said has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Said has filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected

**_____________________** * This opinion is not designated for publication. See **5th Cir .**  **R .**  47.5. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED September 4, 2024 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 24-10152 Document: 42-1 Page: 1 Date Filed: 09/04/2024No. 24 - 10152

2 therein, as well as Said ’s response. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is **GRANTED** , counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the appeal is **DISMISSED** . See **5th Cir. R** . 42.2. Said’s motion to appoint new counsel is **DENIED** . Case: 24-10152 Document: 42-1 Page: 2 Date Filed: 09/04/2024
<PAGE>


          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
           PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Amcast Industrial Corporation (the
"Issuer") on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended August 31, 2002, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Byron O. Pond, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Issuer, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Issuer.

By: /s/ Byron O. Pond
----------------------
   Byron O. Pond
   Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
   November 13, 2002
#### RTC CORPORATION, a Florida corporation, and Albert J. Berry, jointly and severally, Appellants, v. SEA-LAND SERVICE, INC., a corporation, Appellee.

No. 72-1281.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Feb. 19, 1973.

Rehearing Denied March 13, 1973.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3052 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3052

To amend the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States to correct 
           the tariff treatment of certain nickel catalysts.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 13, 1993

 Mr. Santorum introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States to correct 
           the tariff treatment of certain nickel catalysts.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CERTAIN NICKEL CATALYSTS.

    The Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by 
striking subheading 3815.11.00 and inserting the following new 
subheadings, with a superior heading thereto having the same degree of 
indentation as subheading 3815.12.00, and with the subheadings 
3815.11.10 and 3815.11.20 having the same degree of indentation as 
subheading 3815.90.10:
      

``  ..........    With nickel or nickel compounds as the                                                        
                   active substance:                                                                            
    3815.11.10    Containing nickel powder, or nickel                       Free             25%                
                   compound powder, suspended or                             (A,CA,E,IL)                        
                   encapsulated in vegetable oil or                                                             
                   tallow................................  3.7%                                                 
    3815.11.20    Other..................................  Free                              25%                
                                                                                                              ''

SEC. 2. EFFECTIVE DATE.

    The amendment made by section 1 shall apply with respect to goods 
entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after the 
15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.

                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 7.1

CutCo Industries, Inc.                      Office of the Chairman of the Board


                                                 July 27, 1998

Mr. Don vonLiebermann
54 Kellogg Hill Road
Weston, CT  06883

     Re:  Amendment of Employment Agreement

Dear Mr. vonLiebermann:

     On July 27, 1998, the Board of Directors approved the amendment to your
present Employment Agreement to provide that the Agreement be extended on the
same terms and conditions as the prior year for a one year period ending July
31, 1999.

     Kindly indicate your agreement to the above by signing below.


                                                     Sincerely,

                                                     CUTCO INDUSTRIES, INC.


                                                     /s/  Marvin W. Marcus    
                                                     ----------------------
                                                           Marvin W. Marcus
MWM/ms                                                     Chairman

AGREED TO:


       /s/ Don vonLiebermann   
       ----------------------
           DON VON LIEBERMANN



87209

                                     - E-6 -