alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 7.2


CUTCO INDUSTRIES, INC.                       OFFICE OF THE CHAIRMAN OF THE BOARD





                                  June 16, 1997

Mr. Michael Kramer
9 Ryder Court
Dix Hills, NY  11746

                  Re: Amendment of Employment Agreement

Dear Mr. Kramer:

     On June 13, 1997, the Board of Directors approved the amendment to your
present Employment Agreement to provide that the Agreement be extended on the
same terms and conditions as the prior year for a one year period ending July
31, 1998.

     Kindly indicate your agreement to the above by signing below.

                                       Sincerely,

                                       CUTCO INDUSTRIES, INC.

                                       /s/Marvin W. Marcus
                                       ----------------------
mwm/ms                                 Marvin W. Marcus
                                       Chairman
AGREED TO:


           /s/ Michael Kramer
           -----------------------
           MICHAEL KRAMER
##### 



Exhibit 32.1 Certification required by Rule 13a-14(b) or
Rule 15d-14(b) and Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 In connection with the Amendment No. 1 to Annual Report of Dominion Resources Black Warrior
Trust (the Trust) on Form 10-K/A for the period ended December 31, 2004, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, not in its
individual capacity but solely as the trustee of the Trust, certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to its knowledge:  (1)
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and(2)
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Trust. BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., TRUSTEE FOR
DOMINION RESOURCES BLACK WARRIOR TRUSTApril 5, 2005
    By:
    /s/ Ron E. HooperRon E. Hooper,Senior Vice President, Royalty Management


Bank of America, N.A. A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Dominion
Resources Black Warrior Trust and will be retained by Dominion Resources Black Warrior Trust and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
House Calendar No. 194

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 3110

[Report No. 103–635]

A BILL

To designate the United States courthouse and

eral Building’’.Thompson United States Courthouse and FedStreets in Reno, Nevada, as the ‘‘Bruce R.eastern corner of Liberty and South VirginiaFederal building to be constructed at the southAUGUST 1, 1994

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be

printed
IB

House Calendar No. 194

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 3110

[Report No. 103–635]

To designate the United States courthouse and Federal building to be constructed at the southeastern corner of Liberty and South Virginia Streets

in Reno, Nevada, as the ‘‘Bruce R. Thompson United States Courthouse

and Federal Building’’.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

SEPTEMBER 21, 1993

Mrs. VUCANOVICH introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Public Works and Transportation

AUGUST 1, 1994

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed

A BILL

To designate the United States courthouse and Federal

building to be constructed at the southeastern corner

of Liberty and South Virginia Streets in Reno, Nevada,

as the ‘‘Bruce R. Thompson United States Courthouse

and Federal Building’’.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 3110 RH

1 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

2 The United States courthouse and Federal building

3 to be constructed at the southeastern corner of Liberty

4 and South Virginia Streets in Reno, Nevada, is designated

5 as the ‘‘Bruce R. Thompson United States Courthouse

6 and Federal Building’’.

7 SEC. 2. LEGAL REFERENCES.

8 Any reference in any law, regulation, document,

9 record, map, or other paper of the United States to the

10 courthouse and Federal building referred to in section 1

11 is deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Bruce R. Thompson

12 United States Courthouse and Federal Building’’.
<PAGE>   1


                        [RYDER SCOTT COMPANY LETTERHEAD]



                                 March 31, 1999


Dominion Resources Black Warrior Trust
NationsBank of Texas, N.A.
NationsBank Plaza - 17th Floor
901 Main Street
Dallas, Texas  75202

Gentlemen:

          We hereby consent to the inclusion of our report dated March 5, 1999, 
concerning the reserves and revenue, as of January 1, 1999, of certain royalty 
interests owned by Dominion Resources Black Warrior Trust in the Form 10-K for 
the year ended December 31, 1998, of the Dominion Resources Black Warrior Trust 
to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.


                                                       Very truly yours,



                                                       /s/ RYDER SCOTT COMPANY
                                                           PETROLEUM ENGINEERS


                                                           RYDER SCOTT COMPANY
                                                           PETROLEUM ENGINEERS




CPM/sw
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 156 (Monday, August 13, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Page 40115]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-17330]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice: 10499 ]


Notice of Determinations; Culturally Significant Objects Imported 
for Exhibition--Determinations: ``Nordic Impressions: Art From 
[Aring]land, Denmark, the Faroe Islands, Finland, Greenland, Iceland, 
Norway, and Sweden, 1821-2017'' Exhibition

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: I 
hereby determine that certain objects to be included in the exhibition 
``Nordic Impressions: Art from [Aring]land, Denmark, the Faroe Islands, 
Finland, Greenland, Iceland, Norway, and Sweden, 1821-2017,'' imported 
from abroad for temporary exhibition within the United States, are of 
cultural significance. The objects are imported pursuant to loan 
agreements with the foreign owners or custodians. I also determine that 
the exhibition or display of the exhibit objects at The Phillips 
Collection, Washington, District of Columbia, from on or about October 
13, 2018, until on or about January 13, 2019, and at possible 
additional exhibitions or venues yet to be determined, is in the 
national interest. I have ordered that Public Notice of these 
determinations be published in the Federal Register.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Julie Simpson, Attorney-Adviser, 
Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State (telephone: 202-
632-6471; email: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#f6859395829f9998c4c2c3cfb68582978293d8919980"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="c2b1a7a1b6abadacf0f6f7fb82b1b6a3b6a7eca5adb4">[email protected]</span></a>). The mailing address is U.S. 
Department of State, L/PD, SA-5, Suite 5H03, Washington, DC 20522-0505.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The foregoing determinations were made 
pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 
(79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), E.O. 12047 of March 27, 1978, the 
Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 Stat. 2681, 
et seq.; 22 U.S.C. 6501 note, et seq.), Delegation of Authority No. 234 
of October 1, 1999, Delegation of Authority No. 236-3 of August 28, 
2000, and Delegation of Authority No. 236-11 of July 27, 2018.

Jennifer Z. Galt,
Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary for Educational and Cultural 
Affairs, Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2018-17330 Filed 8-10-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4710-05-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3443 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3443

To amend title 5, United States Code, to provide that none of the funds 
in the Employees' Compensation Fund shall be used to pay compensation, 
   benefits, or expenses for individuals convicted of fraud or other 
         violations in connection with benefits from such fund.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            November 3, 1993

 Ms. Shepherd introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                    Committee on Education and Labor

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend title 5, United States Code, to provide that none of the funds 
in the Employees' Compensation Fund shall be used to pay compensation, 
   benefits, or expenses for individuals convicted of fraud or other 
         violations in connection with benefits from such fund.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. TERMINATION OF BENEFITS.

    (a) Termination.-- Section 8102 of title 5, United States Code 
(``the Act'') is amended by redesignating subsection (b) as subsection 
(c) and by adding after subsection (a) the following new subsection:
    ``(b) An individual convicted of--
            ``(1) a violation of section 1920 of title 18 with respect 
        to benefits under subchapter I of chapter 81 of this title, or
            ``(2) any felony fraud related to the application for or 
        receipt of benefits under subchapter I or III of chapter 81 of 
        this title,
shall (in addition to any other penalties provided by this subchapter) 
as of the date of the conviction, forfeit all entitlement to such 
benefits.''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) shall 
apply with respect to a conviction for a violation or felony described 
in such amendment which occurs after the date of the enactment of this 
Act.

                                 <all>
```
# AIRCRAFT INSURANCE POLICY COVERAGE IDENTIFICATION PAGE 

# U. S. SPECIALTY INSURANCE COMPANY

I 

### A CAPITAL STOCK COMPANY I 

### ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES: 1340 3 

### NORTHWEST FREEWAY I 

### HOUSTON , TEXAS 77040-6094 

### YOUR POLICY NUMBER 

# Prior Policy No
. AC3001464-00



### NAME INSURED YOUR AGENT ' S NAME AND ADDRESS Director's Chair Productions, LLC 

### & the managers/members thereof Costello Insurance Associates, Inc.



### YOUR ADDRESS 5239 Pembroke Way San Ramon, CA, 94582 Post Office Box 28280 Tempe, 

### Al.. , 85285



### POLICY PERIOD : 12 : 01 

### A
.M. STANDARD TIME AT YOUR ABOVE ADDRESS FROM : 03/04/2015 

### TO : 10/24/2015 

### LOCATION OF AIRCRAFT:The aircraft will be principally based at PRIVATE STRIP, SAN RAMON, CA 

### DESCRIPT ION O F A IRCRAFT :You have told us that each of the aircraft below (1) 

### has an FAA standard airworth iness certificate unless noted below*; and (2) 

### is solely and unconditi onally owned by you unless noted differently in Item 1 

### a nd/or 11 

### or endorsements we issue.

500 $ NOS: ANNUAL E NDORSEMENT FORMS:

Form Name Form Version Form Title {08/10) PROTECTING THE PRIVACY OF INFORMATION {08/10) WAR HIJACKING AND OTHER PERILS EXCLUSION AlP 1106 (08/10) Document Number: 592772 Page 1 of 3

# AIRCRAFT INSURANCE POLICY COVERAGE IDENTIFICATION PAGE 

# U

. S. SPECIALTY INSURANCE COMPANY YOUR POLICY NUMBER Prior Policy No
. I A CAPITAL STOCK COMPANY I ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES: 13403 NORTHWEST FREEWAY I HOUSTON, TEXAS 77040-6094 {08/1 0} {08/1 0} (01/12) (08/1 0) (08/1 0) (04/14) (04/14) 12 13 (12/13) 12 13 12 13 AIRCRAFT POLICY CONDITIONS HELICOPTERIROTORCRAFT STATE OF CALIFORNIA AMENDATORY ENDORSEMENT POLICY CHANGES AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHY NOTICE OF AVAILABILITY OF TERRORISM INSURANCE COVERAGE EXCLUSION OF CERTIFIED ACTS OF TERRORISM CONDITIONAL EXCLUSION OF TERRORISM CONDITIONAL EXCLUSION OF TERRORISM NOTICE TO POLICYHOLDERS POTENTIAL RESTRICTIONS OF TERRORISM COVERAGE NOTICE TO POLICYHOLDERS POTENTIAL RESTRICTIONS OF TERRORISM COVERAGE AC3001464-00

No pilot certificate or medical certificate required

Open Piiot Warranty

UAV operators as approved 

### by the Named Insured
. No pilot certificate or medical certificate required Named Pilots

No Named Pilots Named Pilots with Requirements

AlP 1106 (08/1 0) Document Number: 592772 Page 2 of 3

# AIRCRAFT INSURANCE POLICY COVERAGE IDENTIFICATION PAGE 

# U. S. SPECIALTY INSURANCE COMPANY

I 

### ACAPITAL STOCK COM PANY. I 

### ADMINISTRATIVE O FFIC ES: 13403 N ORTHWEST F REEWAY I 

### HOUSTON, TEXAS 77040-6094 UAV0001 Your Operation for Aerial Photography and/or Mapping
UAV0002 Your Operation for Aerial Photography and/or Mapping 

# YOUR P OLI CY NUMBER Prior Policy No
. AC3001464-00



## ADDITIONAL INTEREST : Payment for Aircraft Physical Loss or Damage under Coverage F or G will be made to you and



## Countersigned this
__ day of
____ _ Authorized Representative

AlP 1106 (08/10) Document Number: 592772 Page 3 of 3
SCPW

- 23-0000056

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI ‘ I

CAMERON NICE and MARTHA NICE, Petitioners,

vs. THE HONORABLE RANDAL VALENCIANO, Judge of the Circuit Court of the Fifth Circuit, State of Hawai ʻ i, Respondent.

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING (5CCV-22-0000027)

ORDER (By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, Wilson, and Eddins, JJ.) Upon consideration of the March 8, 2023 submission from Cameron and Martha Nice, and the record in this matter, we conclude the submission is, in part, a second motion for reconsideration of this court’s February 10, 2023 order, which denied their original petition for a writ of mandamus, and is, in part, a series of motions for fresh relief, including (1) for interlocutory review of a February 23, 2023 hearing in the underlying litigation; (2) an order from this court removing Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCPW-23-0000056 17-MAR-2023 08:04 AM Dkt. 24 ORD2 Judge Valenciano from the underlying litigation and/or requiring his recusal; (3) an order directing Judge Valenciano to vacate his January 26, 2023 order, which granted withdrawal of the law firm which previously had represented the Nices; (4) an order directing Judge Valenciano to reschedule a number of hearings to accommodate the Nices; (5) an order directing the former firm to renew its representation and/or refund monies to the Nices which were previously paid; (6) an order directing the Disciplinary

Board of the Hawai ʻ i Supreme Court and the Office of Disciplinary Counsel to expedite any investigations of the Nices’ allegations of misconduct against a number of attorneys involved in the underlying litigation; and (7) the provision of free legal representation and/or consultation. We further conclude that either the requested relief is prohibited by court rule, see Rule 40(e) of the Hawai ʻ i Rules of Appellate Procedure, or the Nices, in their additional requests for relief, fail to establish a clear and indisputable right to relief or that they lack other means to adequately redress the alleged wrong, or both. See Straub Clinic & Hospital v. Kochi, 81 Hawai ʻ i 410, 414, 917 P.2d 1284, 1288 (1996); In re Disciplinary Bd. of

Hawai ʻ i Supreme Court, 91 Hawai ʻ i 363, 368-69, 984 P.2d 688, 693- 94 (1999); Breiner v. Sunderland, 112 Hawai ʻ i 60, 68, 143 P.3d 1262, 1270 (2006). Therefore,3 I t is ordered that the motions are denied in their entirety. DATED: Honolulu, Hawai ʻ i, March 17 , 202 3

. /s/ Mark E. Recktenwald /s/ Paula A. Nakayama /s/ Sabrina S. McKenna /s/ Michael D. Wilson /s/ Todd W. Eddins
#### COPLAN PIPE & SUPPLY CO., Inc., a Florida corporation, Appellant, v. Alec P. COURTELIS, Appellee.

No. 67-922.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Third District.

Nov. 14, 1967.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed.
EXHIBIT 7.1

CUTCO INDUSTRIES, INC.                      OFFICE OF THE CHAIRMAN OF THE BOARD








                                 August 14, 1996

Mr. Don vonLiebermann
54 Kellogg Hill Road
Weston, CT  06883

                  Re:  Amendment of Employment Agreement

Dear Mr. vonLiebermann:

     On June 13, 1997, the Board of Directors approved the amendment to your
present Employment Agreement to provide that the Agreement be extended on the
same terms and conditions as the prior year for a one year period ending July
31, 1998.

     Kindly indicate your agreement to the above by signing below.

                                       Sincerely,

                                       CUTCO INDUSTRIES, INC.

                                       /s/Marvin W. Marcus
                                       ------------------------
                                       Marvin W. Marcus
mwm/ms                                 Chairman
AGREED TO:


       /s/ Don vonLiebermann
       ------------------------                    
       DON VON LIEBERMANN
#### John Leonard FINCH, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 71-381.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Sept. 16, 1971.

Appeal from Criminal Court of Record, Orange County; Warren H. Edwards, Judge.

Appeal dismissed.
#### CONTAINER CORPORATION OF AMERICA, a Delaware corporation, Appellant, v. Gene LONG, as Tax Assessor of Bradford County, Florida, et al., Appellees.

No. Q-268.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Feb. 1, 1973.

Rehearing Denied April 3, 1973.

Edward McCarthy, Jr., of Freeman, Richardson, Watson, Slade & McCarthy, Jacksonville, for appellant.

Theron A. Yawn, Starke, for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

This is a companion case to Container Corporation of America v. Gene Long, etc., et al., 274 So.2d 571, in which an opinion of reversal has this day been filed. The judgment appealed herein is reversed and the cause remanded for further proceedings for the reasons and upon the authorities cited in the opinion rendered in the companion case mentioned above.

Reversed.

RAWLS, Acting C. J., WIGGINTON, J., and POWELL, GILLIS E., Associate Judge, concur.
June 9, 2015

Mr. Mathew Berman LA Sky Aerials

377 Fresh Meadows Road Simi Valley, CA 93065

Dear Mr. Berman:

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your request for an exemption from Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR) . It explains why we can not process your request and what you should do in the next 30 days.

Why We Can Not Process Your Request

We entered your March 10, 2015, exemption request on behalf of LA Sky Aerials into the public docket (No. FAA-2015-0573), but we are unabl e to process your request any further. The information you sent does not comply with the requirements of § 11.81 (copy enclosed). For us to consider the request any further, you must send us all of the following:

 The specific section or sections of 14 CFR from which you seek relief, the extent of the relief you seek, and the reason you seek relief.

 The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, how it would benefit the public as a whole.

 Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your request.

What You Should Do

If you want us to process your request any further, you must send the information described earlier to reach us within 30 days. Please note that § 11.63(d) requires you to send your petition for exemption at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption.2

If We Do Not Hear From You

If we do not hear from you within 30 days, we will close the docket without notifying you further. If you have any questions or require additional time, you may call (202) 267-9677.

Sincerely,

/s/

Brenda Robeson Program Analyst, Airmen and Airspace Rules Division

Enclosure
#### SANITARY LINEN SERVICE CO. of Florida, a Florida corporation, d/b/a Sanitary Uniform Rental Service, et al., Appellants, v. EXECUTIVE UNIFORM RENTAL, INC., a Florida corporation, et al., Appellees.

No. 72-996.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Dec. 15, 1972.

Heller & Kaplan, Miami, for appellants.

Ginsberg & Goldman, ■ North Miami Beach, Michael A. Pelle, Hallandale, for appellees.

Before BARKDULL, C. J., and PEARSON and HAVERFIELD, JT.

PER CURIAM.

Appellants, who were plaintiffs below, seek review by interlocutory appeal of an order denying their motion to strike appel-lee’s, Joseph Turetsky, demand for jury trial. The cause was originally instituted upon appellants’ complaint for temporary and permanent injunctions and other equitable relief. The principal issue now before this court is whether a circuit court judge in an equity case could properly exercise his discretion and permit a jury trial pursuant to a motion by the parties to determine the issues involved in the case.

We hold that the submission of questions of fact to a jury in cases involving equitable relief, which questions are traditionally within the province of the chancellor, is a matter within the judicial discretion of the lower court. Berg v. New York Life In*433surance Co., Fla.1956, 88 So.2d 915; Degge v. First State Bank of Eustis, 145 Fla. 438, 199 So. 564 (1941); St. Sophia Greek Orthodox Community v. Vamvaks, Fla.App. 1968, 213 So.2d 313. Appellants have failed to show any abuse of that discretion in the case sub judice, therefore, the order denying appellants’ motion to strike the demand for jury trial will be affirmed and the trial judge is directed to exercise his discretion as to whether or not the issues before him should be heard by a jury.

The remaining orders before this court on interlocutory appeal are without sufficient merit to warrant a reversal. Accordingly, the orders appealed will be affirmed.

Affirmed.
#### STATE of Florida on the relation of WEST FLAGLER ASSOCIATES, LTD., a Florida Limited Partnership, Relator, v. BOARD OF BUSINESS REGULATION ot the State of Florida, et al., Respondents.

No. 0-22.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Aug. 31, 1970.

Roth, Segal & Lavine, Orlando, and Patton, Kanner, Tietig & Segal, Miami, for relator.

A. R. Brautigam, Executive Director, Wilbur Brewton, Earl Faircloth, Atty. Gen., and T. T. Turnbull, Asst. Atty. Gen., Fishback, Davis, Dominick, Simonet & Salfi, Orlando, Sibley, Giblin, Levenson & Ward, Miami Beach, Hoffman, Kem-per & Johnson, George W. Wright, Jr., of Mershon, Sawyer, Johnston, Dunwody & Cole, Miami and Millard Caldwell, for respondents.

PER CURIAM.

This Court issued its Alternative Writ of Mandamus and Rule Nisi in Prohibition in this cause. Response and return thereto have been filed by the respondents together with their respective briefs and oral argument has been heard.

That in full consideration of the foregoing this Court is of the opinion and so hold that there is no legal basis shown for the issuance of a Preemptory Writ of Mandamus in said cause in that the act sought to be coerced is discretionary and not purely ministerial and therefore the Alternative Writ heretofore issued is hereby discharged.

It appearing from the record that the Board had completed the action prayed *678to be prohibited, prohibition will not lie and the petition therefor is hereby denied.

JOHNSON, C. J., and WIGGINTON, J., concur.

SPECTOR, J., dissents.

SPECTOR, Judge,

dissenting:

I respectfully dissent from the opinion of the court for the reasons set forth in my dissent in Biscayne Kennel Club. Inc. v. Board of Business Regulation et al., 239 So.2d 53, filed August 31, 1970.