alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
U.S. flag
              An official website of the United States government Skip to main content   end of header Census.gov Newsroom Releases Economic Surveys
 Newsroom Archive
 Skip left menu navigation
 About the Newsroom
 				Facts for Features
 				**News Releases**
 				Press Kits
 				Tip Sheets
 Release Information CB11-TPS.06 **Contact:**  Public Information Office
(301) 763-3030 (phone)
(301) 763-3762 (fax)
(301) 457-1037 (TDD)PIO@census.gov
 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:  WEDNESDAY, MARCH 23, 2011 2009 Business Dynamics Statistics (BDS) 2009 Business Dynamics Statistics (BDS) http://www.ces.census.gov/docs/bds/plugin-BDS%20March%202011%20single_0322_FINAL.pdf **No news release associated with this report. Tip Sheet only.**
 
 CONNECT WITH US

Information Quality
                    Data Linkage Infrastructure
                    Data Protection and Privacy Policy
                    Accessibility      
                    FOIA
                    Inspector General
                    No FEAR Act
                    U.S. Department of Commerce
                    USA.gov
                   Measuring America's People, Places, and Economy
<PAGE>


                                  UNITED STATES
                       SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                             Washington, D.C. 20549

                                    FORM 8-K

                                 CURRENT REPORT

Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of The Securities Exchange Act of 1934

Date of report (Date of earliest event reported) - SEPTEMBER 8, 2000
                                                   -----------------

                                   BYL BANCORP
                                   -----------
             (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

         CALIFORNIA                    000-23257             33-0755794
         ----------                    ---------             ----------
   (Name or other jurisdiction        (Commission          (IRS Employer
        of incorporation)             File Number)       Identification No.)



1875 NORTH TUSTIN STREET, ORANGE, CALIFORNIA                     92865
--------------------------------------------                     -----
  (Address of principal executive office)                      (Zip Code)


(Registrants' telephone number, including area code) -- (714) 685-1317
                                                        --------------


                  ---------------------------------------------
         (Former name or former address, if changed since last report.)


                                       1

<PAGE>



Item 5.  OTHER EVENTS

BYL Bancorp ("BYL"), the holding company for BYL Bank Group, announced its
intention to appoint Sy Jacobs to the boards of directors of both BYL and BYL
Bank Group, subject to all necessary regulatory approvals. The appointment is
made as part of an agreement with an investor group led by Mr. Jacobs, of JAM
Partners, L.P., pursuant to which the investor group will withdraw its request
to BYL to include an alternative slate of directors at its annual meeting of
stockholders scheduled for September 27, 2000.

Item 7.  FINANCIAL STATEMENT AND EXHIBITS

(c)      Exhibits

10.15    Agreement by and among BYL Bancorp, BYL Bank Group, JAM Partners, L.P.,
         Sy Jacobs, Everest Partners Limited Partnership, Everest Managers,
         L.L.C., David M. W. Harvey and Nick Becker

99(1)    Copy of Press Release.



                                       2
<PAGE>



                                    SIGNATURE

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1934, the Registrant has
duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned hereunto
duly authorized.

                                       BYL BANCORP


Dated: September 8, 2000               By: /s/ Robert Ucciferri
                                       ----------------------------------------
                                       Robert Ucciferri
                                       President and Chief Executive Officer


                                       3
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>   5
<LEGEND>
    THE SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  SUMMARY  FINANCIAL  INFORMATION  EXTRACTED  FROM THE
    CONSOLIDATED   FINANCIAL  STATEMENTS  OF  DOUGHTIE'S  FOODS,  INC.  AND  ITS
    SUBSIDIARIES  FOR THE YEAR ENDED  DECEMBER  26, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
    ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>  1,000
       
<S>                                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-26-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 Dec-28-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-26-1998
<CASH>                                                  17
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        8,012
<ALLOWANCES>                                           360
<INVENTORY>                                          4,626
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                    12,579
<PP&E>                                               6,295
<DEPRECIATION>                                       3,763
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                      15,223
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                4,686
<BONDS>                                                683
<COMMON>                                             1,495
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<OTHER-SE>                                           8,359
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                        15,223
<SALES>                                             87,194
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                    87,194
<CGS>                                               73,043
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                       85,089
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                         0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                     162
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      1,943
<INCOME-TAX>                                           746
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  1,197
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                         1,197
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                          .80
<EPS-DILUTED>                                          .80
        

</TABLE>
# C_2014033EN.01000901.xml

| 5.2.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 33/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.2.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 33/9

---

Call for proposals — ‘Enterprise Europe Network: Growth-oriented business support services improving competitiveness and access to markets for EU enterprises’ under the EU programme for Competitiveness of Enterprises and SMEs (COSME Regulation (EU) No 1287/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council (1))

1

2014/C 33/06

The Executive Agency for Small and Medium Sized Enterprises (EASME) is hereby launching a call for proposals to establish the Enterprise Europe Network for the period 2015-2020 by selecting the organisations that will participate in the Network.

The call is closing on 15 May 2014.

Information on the modalities of the call and guidance to proposers on how to submit projects, is available on http://ec.europa.eu/enterprise/contracts-grants/calls-for-proposals/index_en.htm

The helpdesk can be reached on EASME-COSME-EEN-CALL-2014@ec.europa.eu

---

(1)  Regulation (EU) No 1287/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 December 2013 establishing a Programme for the Competitiveness of Enterprises and small and medium-sized enterprises (COSME) (2014-2020) and repealing Decision No 1639/2006/EC (OJ L 347, 20.12.2013, p. 33).

1

---
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3414 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3414

 To amend title 39, United States Code, to grant State governments the 
     discretion to assign mailing addresses to sites within their 
                             jurisdiction.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 28, 1993

Mr. Saxton (for himself, Mr. Gallo, Mr. Ridge, Mr. Smith of New Jersey, 
 and Mr. Zimmer) introduced the following bill; which was referred to 
             the Committee on Post Office and Civil Service

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend title 39, United States Code, to grant State governments the 
     discretion to assign mailing addresses to sites within their 
                             jurisdiction.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled, That chapter 4 of title 
39, United States Code (relating to the authority of the United States 
Postal Service) is amended--
            (1) by adding at the end the following:
``Sec. 414. Authority of State governments to designate mailing 
              addresses
    ``(a) Notwithstanding section 404(a)(1), State governments shall 
have the discretion to designate mailing addresses for all sites within 
their jurisdiction.
    ``(b) Whenever a State government designates a mailing address 
under subsection (a), such government shall include as part of such 
mailing address--
            ``(1) the name of the municipality in which the site of 
        such address is geographically situated; and
            ``(2) the ZIP code number assigned to the site of such 
        address by the Postal Service.
    ``(c) A mailing address designated by a State government under 
paragraph subsection (a) shall become effective 30 days after the 
Postal Service receives written notice from such government of the 
designation of such address, subject to subsection (d).
    ``(d) Notification under subsection (c) shall not become effective 
unless the postmaster for each post office responsible for delivering 
mail to any of the proposed addresses reviews and makes recommendations 
to ensure that duplicative street names and faulty numbering systems do 
not exist within the jurisdiction involved.''; and
            (2) by inserting in the table of sections, after the item 
        relating to section 413, the following:

``414. Authority of State governments to designate mailing 
                            addresses.''.

                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 32.1




Certification
of Chief Executive Officer(1)
 
 
 
 Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, the following certification is being made to accompany the Registrant’s
Annual Report on Form 10-K  for the period ended August 2,
2008:
 
 In
connection with the Annual Report of Del Global Technologies Corp. (the
“Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ended August 2, 2008 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, James
A. Risher, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. § 1350, adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
that to my knowledge:
 
 (1)            The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d),
as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
and
 
 (2)            The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 
 
 /s/
      James A. RisherName:
      James A. RisherTitle:
      Chief Executive OfficerDate:
      October 6, 2008
 
 
 
 
 
 
 (1)            A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Del Global Technologies Corp and will be retained by Del Global
Technologies Corp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
its staff upon request.
 
 The
foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure
document.
<PAGE>

                                                             Exhibit 23.6

              CONSENT OF MORGAN STANLEY & CO. INCORPORATED

We hereby consent to the use in the Registration Statement of WCB Holding
Corp. on Form S-4 and in the Proxy Statement/Prospectus of FPL Group, Inc.
and Entergy Corporation which is part of the Registration Statement, of our
opinion dated July 28, 2000 appearing as Annex C to such Proxy
Statement/Prospectus, to the description therein of such opinion and to the
references therein to our name in the section entitled "Opinions of Entergy's
Financial Advisors". In giving the foregoing consent, we do not admit that we
come within the category of persons whose consent is required under Section 7
of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the "Securities Act"), or the
rules and regulations promulgated thereunder, nor do we admit that we are
experts with respect to any part of such Registration Statement within the
meaning of the term "experts" as used in the Securities Act or the rules and
regulations promulgated thereunder.


                                                    MORGAN STANLEY & CO.
                                                    INCORPORATED


                                                    By: /s/ Lyle D. Miller
                                                        --------------------
                                                        Lyle D. Miller
                                                        Principal

New York, New York
August 24, 2000
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

SALT RIVER PROJECT

AGRICULTURAL IMPROVEMENT

AND POWER DISTRICT, a municipal

corporation and political subdivision of the

State of Arizona; et al.,

 Plaintiffs - Appellants,

 v.

REYNOLD R. LEE; et al.,

 Defendants - Appellees.

No. 09-15306

D.C. No. 3:08-cv-08028-JAT

MEMORANDUM *

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Arizona

James A. Teilborg, District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted February 10, 2010

San Francisco, California

Before: GOODWIN, BERZON and IKUTA, Circuit Judges.

Salt River Project Agricultural Improvement and Power District and

Headwaters Resources, Inc., collectively referred to as Salt River Project, appeal

FILED

MAR 19 2010

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
the district court’s grant of a Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b) motion to dismiss for failure to

exhaust the contractual grievance procedures in a lease between Salt River Project

and the Navajo Nation. We review the district court’s application of substantive

law de novo, and its findings of fact for clear error. Ritz v. Int’l Longshoremen’s &

Warehousemen’s Union, 837 F.2d 365, 369 (9th Cir. 1998) (per curiam). We

reverse.

The district court erred in ordering Salt River Project to refer its claims to

the United States Secretary of the Interior pursuant to the grievance procedures in

§ 25 of the 1969 Lease. Assuming, without deciding, that those procedures apply

to Salt River Project’s claims, Salt River Project has already submitted its dispute

to the Secretary of the Interior under both § 25 of the 1969 Lease and § 10 of the §

323 Grant. The Secretary, without regard to the pending litigation, reviewed the

substance of the dispute and addressed Salt River Project’s request for intervention

by the Secretary. Letter from Carl J. Artman, Assistant Secretary – Indian Affairs,

U.S. Dep’t of the Interior, to Jane D. Alfano, Corporate Counsel, Salt River Project

(May 10, 2008). The Secretary later declined to reconsider his initial decision. 

Letter from George T. Skibine, Acting Deputy Assistant for Policy and Economic

Development, U.S. Dep’t of the Interior, to John J. Egbert, Esq., Jennings, Strouss

& Salmon, PLC (October 2, 2008). Contrary to the district court’s supposition,

Salt River Project has no further obligation to submit its dispute to the Secretary
under the 1969 Lease’s dispute resolution provisions. Its claims are thus properly

before the district court. See Arizona Public Service Co. v. Aspaas, 77 F.3d 1128,

1132-34 (9th Cir. 1995).

REVERSED and REMANDED for further proceedings.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                          59,455
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                59,455
<PP&E>                                     155,817,500
<DEPRECIATION>                              70,231,426
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              85,645,529
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          112,500
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                  85,533,029
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                85,645,529
<SALES>                                     22,849,760
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            22,926,636
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  699,832
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             22,226,804
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                22,226,804
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     2.83
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     2.83
        

</TABLE>
#### Pedro M. VALLES, Appellant, v. Paul S. BEY, Sr., Appellee.

No. 67-501.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Third District.

Aug. 14, 1967.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed.
Regulatory Evaluation

Docket No. FAA-2011-1222 Directorate Identifier: 2010-NM-268-AD

If you make changes to the values in the table below, you must ensure the totals update 

accordingly. If they do not, click (or Tab) into and then out of the changed cell.

Estimated Costs:

Action

(e.g., Inspection, 

replacement)

Do not include oncondition costs here

Costs per Product (e.g., aircraft, engine, 

propeller, appliance)

Work-hours

(include 

access, testing, 

and close-up)

Labor 

cost 

(@$85/h

our)

Parts Cost Total Costs 

(labor + 

parts)

Number of 

U.S. 

Registered

Products

Total Cost 

for U.S. Fleet

Modify or replace

to a -7

2.0 $ 170.00 $223 $ 393.00 557 $218,901.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

3/10/11 Concurrent 

costs approved by eng. $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

SB 5A3307-25-3 1.0 $ 85.00 $1,749 and

$1,836

$1,834 and

$1,921

$1,021,538.

$1,069,997.

SB 25-349 1.0 $ 85.00 0 $ 85.00 $ 47,345.

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

The known number of products in compliance:

Total Costs of compliance for U.S. fleet: $ 218,901

Costs covered under warranty (if known) $

On-Condition Costs: 

Action

(e.g., Inspection, 

replacement)

Work-hours 

(include access, 

testing, and closeup)

Labor cost 

(@$85/hour)

Parts Cost Cost per Product

SB 5A3307-25-389 1.0 $ 85.00 $942.00 $1,027.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00
Special considerations for Economic Analysis (Use this field to explain anything in the Estimated 

Costs table that was assumed or might not be obvious. This field can also be used to explain warranty costs):

Executive Order 12866:

Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action”?

YES* NO 

*Explanation: 

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:

Is the AD significant? 

YES* NO 

*Explanation: 

Regulatory Flexibility Act:

Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? Explain

for either a Yes or No answer.

YES NO 

Explanation: 

Intrastate Aviation in Alaska:

This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is it appropriate to include specific requirements 

for aircraft operated in Alaska where aviation might be the only mode of transportation?

YES* NO 

*Explanation: