alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                  EXHIBIT 12-B

                         DELMARVA POWER & LIGHT COMPANY

           RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES AND PREFERRED DIVIDENDS
                             (DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                    1995       1994       1993       1992       1991
                                  --------   --------   --------   --------   --------
<S>                               <C>        <C>        <C>        <C>        <C>

Net income (1)                    $117,488   $108,310   $111,076    $98,526    $80,506
                                  --------   --------   --------   --------   --------
Income taxes (1)                    75,540     67,613     67,102     54,834     43,249
                                  --------   --------   --------   --------   --------

Fixed charges:
 Interest on long-term debt
  including amortization of
  discount, premium and
  expense                           65,572     61,128     62,651     66,976     68,133
 Other interest                     10,353      9,336      9,245      8,449     10,192
                                  --------   --------   --------   --------   --------
   Total fixed charges              75,925     70,464     71,896     75,425     78,325
                                  --------   --------   --------   --------   --------
Nonutility capitalized interest       (304)      (256)      (246)      (231)      (143)
                                  --------   --------   --------   --------   --------
Earnings before income taxes
 and fixed charges                $268,649   $246,131   $249,828   $228,554   $201,937
                                  ========   ========   ========   ========   ========
Fixed charges                      $75,925    $70,464    $71,896    $75,425    $78,325
Preferred dividend requirements     16,185     15,948     14,803     15,785     11,672
                                  --------   --------   --------   --------   --------
                                   $92,110    $86,412    $86,699    $91,210    $89,997
                                  ========   ========   ========   ========   ========
Ratio of earnings to fixed charges
 and preferred dividends              2.92       2.85       2.88       2.51       2.24

</TABLE>

For purposes of computing the ratio, earnings are net income plus income 
taxes and  fixed charges, less nonutility capitalized interest.  Fixed 
charges consist of interest on long- and short-term debt, amortization of 
debt discount, premium, and expense, plus the interest factor associated with 
the Company's major leases, and one-third of the remaining annual rentals.  
Preferred dividend requirements represent annualized preferred dividend 
requirements multiplied by the ratio that pre-tax income bears to net income.

(1) Net income and income taxes related to the cumulative effect of a change 
    in accounting for unbilled revenues recorded in 1991 are excluded from the 
    computation of this ratio.
U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket Operations

West Building Ground Floor, Room w12 - 1 40 1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. Washington, DC 20590 

## Application **to Amend**

**Section 333 Exemption No. 12787**  **Reg ulatory Docket No. FAA** **- 2015**  **- 1845**  November 1, 2015 **Petitioner:** Ravenwood HD Services, llc 13870 East River Vista Circle Palmer, AK 99645 Cell: 907- 631 - 8791 Email: kevin@ravenwoodhd.com
Greetings, By letter from the FAA dated September 8, 2015, an exemption was granted to Ravenwood HD Services for relief under Section 333. That letter was marked Section 333 Exemption No. 12787 Regulatory Docket No. FAA- 2015 - 1845 . Ravenwood HD Services hereby requests that the exemption so granted be amended to include 3D Robotics Iris, Solo, Aero, and Aero- M. Ravenwood HD Services also requests that the exemption include the following DJI models: Phantom 2/ 3 , Inspire, Spreading Wings, and Flame Wheel. Re levant facts and reasoning are:  Size, weight and performance specification of the requested platforms are substantially similar to those of the 3D Robotics X8+ in all relevant aspects : o Gross weight: less than 55 lbs . o Top Speed: less than 87 knots. o All requested airframes can be operated safely at less than 400 AGL  The findings, rationale and conclusions contained in the FAA’s Exemption No. 12787 apply without modification to this application to include all airframes contained herein. Thank you for your consideration of this important request. Please advise us of any a dditional information that is required. Sincerely,

/ Kevin D. Hubbard/ Managing Member, Ravenwood HD Services llc
#### Phillip CHAFETZ, Appellant, v. Arthur PUNTERVOLD, Appellee.

No. 67-87.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Third District.

Aug. 7, 1967.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed.
V

Private Calendar No. 14

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 3344

[Report No. 103–836]

For the relief of Lloyd B. Gamble.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

OCTOBER 21, 1993

Ms. BYRNE introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee

on the Judiciary

OCTOBER 5, 1994

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House and ordered to be printed

A BILL

For the relief of Lloyd B. Gamble.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. APPROPRIATION OF FUNDS.

4 (a) PAYMENT.—The Secretary of the Treasury shall

5 pay, out of any money in the Treasury not otherwise ap6 propriated, to Lloyd B. Gamble of Fairfax, Virginia, the

7 sum of $253,488.
2

HR 3344 RH

1 (b) BASIS.—The payment required by subsection (a)

2 shall be to compensate Lloyd B. Gamble for the injuries

3 sustained by him as a result of the administration to him,

4 without his knowledge, of lysergic acid diethylamide by

5 United States Army personnel in 1957.

6 SEC. 2. SATISFACTION OF CLAIMS.

7 The payment made pursuant to section 1 shall be in

8 full satisfaction of all claims Lloyd B. Gamble may have

9 against the United States for any injury described in such

10 section.

11 SEC. 3. INELIGIBILITY FOR ADDITIONAL BENEFITS.

12 Upon payment of the sum referred to in section 1,

13 Lloyd B. Gamble shall not be eligible for any compensa14 tion or benefits from the Department of Veterans Affairs

15 or the Department of Defense for any injury described in

16 such section.

17 SEC. 4. LIMITATION OF AGENTS AND ATTORNEYS FEES.

18 It shall be unlawful for an amount of more than 10

19 percent of the amount paid pursuant to section 1 to be

20 paid to or received by any agent or attorney for any service

21 rendered to Lloyd B. Gamble in connection with the bene22 fits provided by this Act. Any person who violates this sec23 tion shall be guilty of an infraction and shall be subject

24 to a fine in the amount provided in title 18, United States

25 Code.

Private Calendar No. 14

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 3344

[Report No. 103–836]

A BILL

For the relief of Lloyd B. Gamble.

OCTOBER 5, 1994

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House and

ordered to be printed
# C_2014079EN.01000301.xml

| 18.3.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 79/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.3.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 79/3

---

Notice for the attention of the persons subject to the restrictive measures provided for in Council Decision 2014/145/CFSP and in Council Regulation (EU) No 269/2014 concerning restrictive measures in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine

2014/C 79/03

The following information is brought to the attention of the persons who appear in the Annex to Council Decision 2014/145/CFSP (1) and in Annex I to Council Regulation (EU) No 269/2014 (2) concerning restrictive measures in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine.

1

2

The Council of the European Union has decided that the persons that appear in the abovementioned Annexes should be included in the list of persons and entities subject to restrictive measures provided for in Council Decision 2014/145/CFSP and in Council Regulation (EU) No 269/2014 concerning restrictive measures in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine. The grounds for designations of those persons appear in the relevant entries in those Annexes.

The attention of the persons concerned is drawn to the possibility of making an application to the competent authorities of the relevant Member State(s) as indicated in the websites in Annex II to Council Regulation (EU) No 269/2014, in order to obtain an authorisation to use frozen funds for basic needs or specific payments (cf. Article 4 of the Regulation).

The persons concerned may submit a request to the Council, together with supporting documentation, that the decision to include them on the abovementioned list should be reconsidered, to the following address:

| Council of the European Union |
| --- |
| General Secretariat |
| DG C 1C |
| Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175 |
| 1048 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |

Council of the European Union

General Secretariat

DG C 1C

Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175

1048 Bruxelles/Brussel

BELGIQUE/BELGIË

E-mail: sanctions@consilium.europa.eu

The attention of the persons concerned is also drawn to the possibility of challenging the Council's decision before the General Court of the European Union, in accordance with the conditions laid down in Article 275, second paragraph, and Article 263, fourth and sixth paragraphs, of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union.

---

(1)  OJ L 78, 17.3.2014, p. 16.

1

(2)  OJ L 78, 17.3.2014, p. 6.

2

---
#### Pat William ALMOND v. Helen Ann Butler ALMOND.

No. 62395.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

June 30, 1978.

In re: Pat William Almond applying for certiorari, or writ of review to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit. Parish of W. Baton Rouge. 357 So.2d 875.

Writ denied.

SANDERS, C. J., and DENNIS, J., would grant the writ.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.2


INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

We consent to the incorporation by reference in this Registration Statement of
Tab Products Co. on Form S-8 of our report dated June 28, 2000 (August 10, 2000
as to Notes 8 and 16) appearing in the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Tab
Products Co. for the year ended May 31, 2000.


     /s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP
--------------------------------------
DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

San Jose, California
September 18, 2000
U.S. flag
              An official website of the United States government





---

close


Philippines
 Basic Facts Population
 People per sq. km
 Males per 100 females
 Children per woman
 Goods exported from U.S.
 Goods imported to U.S.
 Change in exports from U.S. for 2013 to 2022
 A Closer Look Source
 Comparisons
 Compared to the U.S.
 Compared to the World
 K = Thousands
				M = Millions
				B = Billions
  Merchandise Trade U.S. Trade in Manufactured Goods
 Top Exported Goods by U.S. State or Territory
 Population Current and Projected Population
 Population by Age and Sex
 Source and Notes Source: U.S. Census Bureau, International Database (demographic data) and USA Trade Online (trade data); Central Intelligence Agency, The World Fact Book (country reference maps). This application presents data for 228 countries and areas of the world with a 2024 population of 5,000 or more. For eleven of those countries and areas, only demographic data are presented. "Data not available" indicates that data are not available from this application.  In such instances, data may be available elsewhere at the census.gov website. Trade figures presented for France do not include data for overseas departments French Guiana, Guadeloupe, Martinique, Mayotte, and Reunion but do include data for dependencies Saint Barthelemy and Saint Martin.  Trade figures for the United Kingdom include data for crown dependencies Guernsey, Isle of Man, and Jersey. To learn more about world population projections, go to Notes on the World Population Clock. To learn more about international trade data, go to Guide to Foreign Trade Statistics. All trade figures are in U.S. dollars on a nominal basis.


CONNECT WITH US
 Information Quality
                    Data Linkage Infrastructure
                    Data Protection and Privacy Policy
                    Accessibility      
                    FOIA
                    Inspector General
                    No FEAR Act
                    U.S. Department of Commerce
                    USA.gov
  Measuring America's People, Places, and Economy
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 3050

To expand the boundaries of the Red Rock Canyon National Conservation

Area.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

SEPTEMBER 13, 1993

Mr. BILBRAY introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Natural Resources

A BILL

To expand the boundaries of the Red Rock Canyon National

Conservation Area.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. BOUNDARY EXPANSION.

4 Section 3(a)(2) of the Red Rock Canyon National

5 Conservation Area Establishment Act of 1990 (16 U.S.C.

6 460ccc–1(a)(2)) is amended to read as follows:

7 ‘‘(2) The conservation area shall consist of ap8 proximately 176,500 acres as generally depicted on

9 a map entitled ‘Red Rock Canyon National Con-
2

•HR 3050 IH

1 servation Area—Proposed Expansion’, numbered

2 NV–RRCNCA–002, and dated August 1993.’’.

Æ
Exhibit 32.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


           In connection with the Annual Report of Trident Rowan Group, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2001, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Mark S. Hauser, Joint Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

           1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
              or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

           2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
              material respects, the financial condition and results of
              operations of the Company.


Date: May 25, 2004
                                                /s/ Mark S. Hauser
                                                ------------------------
                                                Mark S. Hauser


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
SECTION 1.  Amendments to Indenture.  The Indenture is hereby
amended as follows:

                  1.1.  Clause (vi) of the definition of "Permitted  Investment"
in Section 1.1 of the Indenture is amended by deleting the  references to "$10.0
million"  and "15  consecutive  days"  set  forth  therein  and  replacing  such
references with "$20.0 million" and "45 consecutive days," respectively.

                  1.2.  Section  4.8(c) of the  Indenture is amended by deleting
the references to "$10.0  million" and "15  consecutive  days" set forth therein
and replacing such references  with "$20.0  million" and "45 consecutive  days,"
respectively.
#### Richard Keller AVENELL, Appellant, v. The FLORIDA NATIONAL BANK AT ORLANDO, a United States banking corporation, Appellee.

No. 71-552.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Aug. 16, 1971.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Orange County; B. C. Muszynski, Judge.

Appeal dismissed.
#### In the Matter of the Accounting of Ben H. Brown, as Ancillary Administrator of the Estate of Ike Menschefrend, Deceased.

Surrogate’s Court, New York County,

June 26, 1953.

*662
      *Theodore Garris*for ancillary administrator, petitioner.

*Nathaniel L. Goldstein, Attorney-General (Samuel A. Hirshowits*and *Flavius N. Coster ella*of counsel), for unknown distributees, respondent.

Collins, S.

The court holds that the Abandoned Property Law has no application to the bank accounts here in question as the payment by the banks to the ancillary administrator indicates that his right to receive the property was established to their satisfaction and under the terms of subdivision *2*of section 300, the property ceased to be deemed abandoned, if it were ever such in fact. Section 272 of the Surrogate’s Court Act has no application to the funds now in the hands of the ancillary administrator as the person entitled to the distribution is not unknown but is the domiciliary administrator appointed by the proper court in California. The inference that the property escheats because of the lack of present knowledge as to the persons who will ultimately receive the balance for distribution is without merit. While no New York State case in point has been cited or found on independent investigation, the case of *Matter of Lyon’s Estate*(175 Wash. 115) sets out a similar problem and helps to persuade the court that there is no escheat but that the balance of the property on hand should be transmitted by the ancillary administrator to the domiciliary administrator to be administered pursuant to the laws of California. The fee of the attorney for the petitioner has been fixed and allowed in the amount requested.

Submit decree on notice accordingly.
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3422 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3422

 To authorize the Secretary of the Navy to transfer, without regard to 
  the required waiting period, an obsolete naval vessel to the United 
 States Naval Shipbuilding Museum, Quincy, Massachusetts, upon making 
                        certain determinations.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            November 2, 1993

  Mr. Studds introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Armed Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To authorize the Secretary of the Navy to transfer, without regard to 
  the required waiting period, an obsolete naval vessel to the United 
 States Naval Shipbuilding Museum, Quincy, Massachusetts, upon making 
                        certain determinations.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. WAIVER OF WAITING PERIOD TO TRANSFER VESSEL.

    Notwithstanding subsection (c)(2) of section 7308 of title 10, 
United States Code, the Secretary of the Navy may transfer under such 
section the obsolete heavy cruiser U.S.S. Salem to the United States 
Naval Shipbuilding Museum in Quincy, Massachusetts, immediately upon 
the Secretary's determination that--
            (1) such cruiser is in environmentally safe condition as 
        determined by appropriate tests, including tests administered 
        by the Environmental Protection Agency; and
            (2) such Museum has adequate financial resources to 
        maintain such cruiser in a condition satisfactory to the 
        Department of the Navy.

                                 <all>
```
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

MICHAEL RAMON OCHOA,

Petitioner

v.

DR. ARTHUR LEVINE, ET AL,

Respondents :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 137 WAL 2019

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 16th day of September, 2019

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED

.

Justice Wecht did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.
# C_2012052EN.01000102.xml

| 22.2.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 52/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.2.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 52/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.6436 — Volkswagen Financial Services/D'Ieteren/Volkswagen D'Ieteren Finance JV)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2012/C 52/02

On 20 December 2011, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32011M6436. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32011M6436. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.

---
EXHIBIT 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of IZEA Holdings, Inc., a Nevada corporation (the “Company”), on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2012 , as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Edward Murphy, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)           The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)           The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





Dated: May 15, 2012





/s/ Edward MurphyEdward MurphyChief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)