```

[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 164 (Thursday, August 23, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Pages 42640-42644]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-18194]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

RIN 0648--XG261

U.S. Purse Seine Fishery in the Western and Central Pacific 
Ocean; Notice of Intent To Prepare an Environmental Impact Statement

AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and 
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.

ACTION: Notice; intent to prepare an environmental impact statement; 
announcement of public scoping period; request for comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: NMFS is gathering information necessary to prepare an 
Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) for future management actions for 
the U.S. purse seine fishery in the western and central Pacific Ocean 
(WCPO). This notice of intent to prepare an EIS represents the 
beginning of the public scoping process and invites interested parties 
to provide comments on alternatives to be considered in an EIS and to 
identify potential issues, concerns, and any reasonable additional 
alternatives that should be considered.

DATES: To ensure consideration during the development of this EIS, 
written comments on the scope and alternatives to be considered in the 
EIS must be submitted no later than October 8, 2018.
    Public comments will also be accepted during two webinars scheduled 
for 9:30-11:30 a.m. September 11, 2018 and 11:30 a.m.-1:30 p.m., 
September 14, 2018. Both webinars are scheduled in Hawai[revaps]i 
Standard Time (HST; UTC-10:00). Please notify David O'Brien (see FOR 
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT, below) by August 31, 2018, if you plan to 
attend either or both webinars. Instructions for connecting or calling 
in to the webinars will be emailed to meeting participants. 
Accommodations for persons with disabilities are available; 
accommodation requests should be directed to David O'Brien at least 10 
working days prior to the webinar.

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments on the scope of this EIS by either 
of the following methods:
     Electronic submission: Submit all electronic public 
comments via the Federal e-Rulemaking Portal.
    1. Go to www.regulations.gov/#!docketDetail;D=NOAA-NMFS-2018-0062,
    2. Click the ``Comment Now!'' icon, complete the required fields, 
and
    3. Enter or attach your comments.

--OR--
     Mail: Submit written comments to Michael D. Tosatto, 
Regional Administrator, NMFS, Pacific Islands Regional Office (PIRO), 
1845 Wasp Blvd., Building 176, Honolulu, HI 96818.
    Instructions: Comments sent by any other method, to any other 
address or individual, or received after the end of the comment period 
might not be considered by NMFS. All comments received are a part of 
the public record and will generally be posted for public viewing on 
www.regulations.gov without change. All personal identifying 
information (e.g., name and address), confidential business 
information, or otherwise sensitive information submitted voluntarily 
by the sender will be publicly accessible. Do not submit confidential 
business information, or otherwise sensitive or protected information. 
NMFS will accept anonymous comments (enter ``N/A'' in the required 
fields if you wish to remain anonymous).
    Copies of this document can be obtained from Michael D. Tosatto, 
Regional Administrator, NMFS PIRO (see address above) and are available 
at www.regulations.gov/#!docketDetail;D=NOAA-NMFS-2018-0062.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: David O'Brien, NMFS PIRO, at 
[email protected], or at (808) 725-5038.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background

    Purse seine vessels flagged to the United States fish for skipjack 
tuna (Katsuwonus pelamis) and other tunas in the WCPO. The fishery 
developed in the 1970s and early 1980s as some U.S. tuna vessels moved 
west from fishing grounds in the eastern Pacific. The vessels 
participating in this fishery currently are large: Between 175 and 260 
feet in length with crews of between 19 and 40. Purse seining is 
fishing by setting a vertically oriented net around a school of fish, 
and then closing, or ``pursing'', the bottom of the net to capture the 
fish. The vessels use purse seine nets up to about 6,500 feet long and 
600 feet deep and in recent years (2013-2017) vessels set their nets, 
on average, once per fishing day.
    NMFS manages the fishery in accordance with U.S. laws implementing 
international agreements, including the Treaty on Fisheries Between the 
Governments of Certain Pacific Island States and the Government of the 
United States of America,\1\ also known as the South Pacific Tuna 
Treaty (hereafter, Treaty), and conservation and management measures 
adopted by the Western and Central Pacific Fisheries Commission 
(hereafter, Commission or WCPFC). The fishery operates in the exclusive 
economic zones (EEZs) of the Pacific Island parties to the Treaty 
(hereafter, PIPs) and that of the United States, as well as on the high 
seas in the WCPO. This EIS will address all U.S. tuna purse seine 
fisheries within the area of application of the Convention on the 
Conservation and Management of Highly Migratory Fish Stocks in the 
Western and Central Pacific Ocean; a map of which is available at the 
WCPFC website at: www.wcpfc.int/doc/convention-area-map.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ Parties to the Treaty include: Australia, Cook Islands, 
Federated States of Micronesia, Republic of Fiji, Republic of 
Kiribati, Republic of Marshall Islands, Republic of Nauru, New 
Zealand, Niue, Republic of Palau, Independent State of Papua New 
Guinea, Independent State of Samoa, Solomon Islands, Kingdom of 
Tonga, Tuvalu, Republic of Vanuatu and the United States of America.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The U.S. purse seine fleet is not the only fishing fleet active in 
this region. Other major flags of purse seine fishing vessels in the 
region include: Japan, Kiribati, Korea, Papua New Guinea, and Taiwan. 
The U.S. fleet's fishing activities accounted for approximately 14 
percent of the total purse seine fishing effort--measured in fishing 
days--in the WCPO from 2010 through 2016.\2\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \2\ Pacific Community--Oceanic Fisheries Programme. 2017. 
WCPFC14 Information Papers 05--Revision 1 (20 Nov 2017) Catch and 
Effort Tables on Tropical Tuna CMMs. Available at: www.wcpfc.int/node/30076..
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The regulations under which the U.S. fleet operates require changes 
in response to new decisions of the

[[Page 42641]]

Commission and new provisions of the Treaty, as well as changes in 
other laws. The Commission typically adopts new conservation and 
management measures relevant to this fishery annually. The PIPs and the 
United States agreed to amendments to the Treaty and its Annexes in 
2016, along with a Memorandum of Understanding regarding their intent 
to provisionally apply some of the amendments pending completion of 
ratification and entry into force. Some provisions of the Treaty 
Annexes extend only through 2020 or 2022. NMFS promulgates regulations 
to implement the Commission's decisions (50 CFR part 300, subpart O) 
under authority of the Western and Central Pacific Fisheries Convention 
Implementation Act (16 U.S.C. 6901 et seq.) and provisions of the 
Treaty (50 CFR part 300, subpart D) under authority of the South 
Pacific Tuna Act (16 U.S.C. 973-973r). In addition, NMFS may regulate 
the fishery to meet the requirements of the Endangered Species Act (16 
U.S.C. 1531 et seq.), Marine Mammal Protection Act (16 U.S.C. 1361 et 
seq.), Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act (16 
U.S.C. 1801 et seq.), and other applicable laws.
    Regulations may control fishing effort and/or catches, specify open 
and closed areas and/or the use and design of fishing gear, among 
others. Recent regulatory changes have focused on Commission decisions 
limiting total fishing effort and the number of sets associated with 
fish aggregating devices (FADs). The objectives of these decisions 
include reducing fishing mortality on bigeye tuna (Thunnus obesus), 
which are caught primarily when fishing on FADs, and controlling 
fishing mortality on yellowfin tuna (Thunnus albacares) and skipjack 
tuna.
    The proposed action in this EIS is the continued authorization of 
the U.S. purse seine fishery in the WCPO. Analysis of this proposed 
action under the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA; 42 U.S.C. 
4321, et seq.) involves examining likely future management of the 
fishery. Since management measures (including Commission decisions, 
Treaty provisions, and other applicable laws) can change substantially 
each year, a wide range of alternative regulatory approaches would be 
appropriate as action alternatives for consideration in this EIS.

Purpose and Need for the Proposed Action

    The purpose of and need for the proposed action is the continued 
authorization of the U.S. purse seine fishery in the WCPO under 
existing and reasonably foreseeable future management measures.

Alternatives for Consideration

    Both no-action and action alternatives have been drafted for 
consideration during the public scoping period. NMFS has not yet 
identified a preferred alternative or preferred alternatives. Briefly, 
these alternatives are:

No-Action Alternatives

    No-action alternatives are used in NEPA documents to establish the 
baseline against which the environmental impacts of the action 
alternatives are assessed, and they are often thought of as either 
maintaining the status quo--or current management--or not proceeding 
with the proposed action. There would still be environmental 
consequences of not proceeding with the proposed action, and defining 
no-action alternatives allows for the explicit evaluation of these 
impacts on their own and in relation to action alternatives. NMFS is 
considering analyzing two separate no-action alternatives in this EIS: 
A no-action alternative under which there would be no U.S. purse seine 
fishery in the WCPO (a no-fishery alternative), as well as a no-action 
alterative under which fishing operations and management would continue 
as they have in recent years (the status quo alternative).
    Specifics of these two draft no-action alternatives are:
     No-action alternative A: No fishery. No U.S. purse seine 
fishing in any portion of the WCPO, which includes the EEZs of the 
United States and other countries, as well as the high seas.
     No-action alternative B: Status quo. A fishery with 
regulatory conditions and fishing activity distributed across the EEZs 
of the United States and other countries and the high seas in 
proportions similar to that seen in recent years (2014-2017). 
Specifically, a fishery with approximately 7,000 fishing days of 
effort, 7,000 total net sets and 2,800 FAD sets (40 percent FAD sets).

Action Alternatives

    Action alternatives are generally the management options proposed 
or considered when the NEPA process begins. The action alternatives are 
meant to describe potential alternative approaches to achieve the 
defined purpose and need of the proposed action. NMFS recommends 
analyzing two specific classes of action alternatives in the EIS:
    1. Alternatives that control the type and amount of fishing, such 
as limits on fishing effort, catches, and fishing methods; and
    2. Alternatives that control the allocation and use of fishing 
privileges amongst participants in the fishery.
    We address these two classes of draft action alternatives 
separately here and describe how they would be addressed concurrently 
in the EIS.
Alternatives That Control the Type and Amount of Fishing
    The controls on type and amount of fishing will be the primary 
drivers of environmental consequences of the fishery. The NMFS approach 
to developing action alternatives has been to review recent 
regulations, Treaty terms, and Commission decisions to understand the 
potential range of future management actions. There has been 
significant variability in management approaches in recent years, and 
both more and less restrictive regulatory changes have occurred.
    Recent controls on the type and amount of fishing have focused on 
limits on fishing effort generally and restrictions on the use of FADs 
(i.e., limits on a subset of fishing effort). For both fishing effort 
and FAD use, NFMS has drafted alternatives that cover a wide range of 
possible future management outcomes (Table 1). NMFS is suggesting this 
approach to extend the usefulness of the analysis in this EIS, as the 
environmental impacts of future management measures that are not 
specifically analyzed can be quickly estimated relative to those that 
are.
Fishing Effort Regulations
    The annual fishing effort possible by the U.S. WCPO purse seine 
fleet is currently limited by the Treaty, which limits the number of 
license applications that may be forwarded to the Treaty Administrator 
to 40. Given the recent average of one net set per fishing day per 
vessel and imagining 40 vessels actively fishing about 80 percent of 
the time, a theoretical maximum annual effort level is approximately 
12,000 fishing days (or 12,000 sets). Over the last 15 years, the 
highest annual fishing effort recorded by the fleet was 8,664 fishing 
days (2014). The maximum number of U.S. purse seine vessels fishing in 
any of the last 15 years has been 40 (2013 and 2014), but it has been 
as low as 15 vessels (2005) and is currently 33 (2018). For the 
purposes of evaluating potential future management actions in this EIS, 
U.S. purse seine effort levels up to 12,000 fishing days annually are 
plausible. Along with the two no-action alternatives, representing 0 
and 7,000 fishing days of effort, respectively, NMFS is considering

[[Page 42642]]

analyzing three action alternatives with respect to limits on fishing 
effort: 5,000, 9,000, and 12,000 fishing days (Table 1).
    The annual fishing effort associated with the action alternatives 
would be distributed across the U.S. EEZ, the high seas, and the EEZs 
of the PIPs. Since 2009, fishing effort in the U.S. EEZ and on the high 
seas in the WCPFC Convention Area has been limited in accordance with 
Commission decisions. The limits on the number of days of effort have, 
in the past, applied to the combined high seas and the U.S. EEZ 
(referred to in U.S. fisheries regulations as the Effort Limit Area for 
Purse Seine, or ELAPS). The combined U.S. EEZ and high seas limits 
dropped from 2,588 fishing days per year in 2009-2013 to 1,828 fishing 
days per year in 2014-2017. Future effort limits could apply to the 
U.S. EEZ and high seas areas separately. NMFS has recently implemented 
a limit of 458 fishing days in the U.S. EEZ--with the potential to 
increase to 558 fishing days if certain conditions are met--and 1,370 
fishing days on the high seas for 2018 (see final rule implementing 
recent decisions of the WCPFC at 83 FR 33851, published July 18, 2018; 
hereafter ``2018 Final Rule'').
    The number of fishing days available to the U.S. purse seine fleet 
in the EEZs of the PIPs is higher than the number of fishing days 
available in the U.S. EEZ or on the high seas. The Treaty specifies a 
set number of ``upfront'' days that are available each year for the 
U.S. fleet to fish in the EEZs of PIPs. The Treaty Annexes stipulate 
the maximum number of upfront days that are available to the U.S. fleet 
and the price per day. The Treaty also identifies that ``additional'' 
days can be purchased by the owners of U.S. vessels directly from 
individual PIPs. Any conditions put by the PIPs on the use of these 
additional days must be consistent with the Treaty terms, but no other 
specifications--such as price--are defined in the Treaty. Provisions 
allowing for additional fishing day purchases were adopted as part of 
the 2016 amendments to the Treaty, and 2017 was the first year that the 
option of purchasing additional days was available under the amended 
Treaty. The only limit to the number of additional days available to 
the U.S. purse seine fleet are limits internally agreed by the PIPs on 
the number of fishing days they will make available--which might be 
informed to some degree by the decisions of the WCPFC--and competition 
for their purchase by other international purse seine fleets.
    Ultimately, the spatial distribution of fishing effort (i.e., with 
respect to the U.S. EEZ, the high seas, and the PIPs' EEZs) will depend 
largely on the amount of effort that is available in each area each 
year. For each action alternative, NMFS would address the specifics of 
effort distribution within each alternative (Table 1) separately; and 
where necessary, NMFS would discuss the implications of variable effort 
distribution on impacts of that alternative to the human environment.
FAD Regulations
    Fish aggregating devices, or FADs, are generally floating objects; 
they include natural objects as well as rafts deployed from purse seine 
vessels specifically to aggregate tuna. FADs tend to attract marine 
life, including tunas, and can be an effective method to increase tuna 
catch per unit of fishing effort. Purse seine sets on FADs tend to 
result in higher catches of targeted skipjack tuna than unassociated 
sets, but also increase the catch of bigeye tuna--most of which is 
relatively young--and young yellowfin tuna, as well as other marine 
life. Recent FAD regulations have included: Prohibitions on the times 
and/or locations that FADs can be deployed, serviced, or set on; limits 
on the annual number of FAD-directed purse seine sets; and a 
combination of both seasonal prohibitions and numerical limits. In 
addition, a recent Commission decision includes a limit of 350 FADs 
with activated instrumented buoys that each fishing vessel may have 
deployed at any given time (see 2018 Final Rule).
    NMFS has implemented FAD-use prohibition periods for the U.S. purse 
seine fleet in the WCPFC Convention Area for 2009-2017 in line with 
Commission decisions. The prohibition periods were in August and 
September in 2009, July through September in 2010-2012, July through 
October in 2013 and 2014, and July through September in 2015-2017. 
There was also a complete prohibition on the use of FADs on the high 
seas for 2017. The 2018 Final Rule established FAD use prohibitions for 
a three-month period (July through September in 2018) and an additional 
FAD use prohibition period in high seas areas for two months (November 
and December 2018). In addition to FAD setting prohibitions, NMFS 
limited the total number of purse seine sets on FADs (``FAD sets'') to 
2,522 per year in 2016 and 2017, in line with Commission decisions. The 
Commission did not establish FAD set limits for 2018.
    Reasonably foreseeable future FAD measures for the fleet could 
include further FAD use prohibition periods and/or set limits as seen 
in recent years, as well as the potential for limitations for FAD 
design, restrictions for FAD construction materials and reductions in 
the number of FADs with activated instrumented buoys. Despite this 
broad range of potential FAD-related management measures, NMFS suggests 
that the total number of FAD sets--measured as the proportion of total 
sets made--could approximate the implications of any proposed future 
FAD management measure.
    NMFS recommends evaluating four levels of FAD restrictions, ranging 
from a full prohibition on FAD sets to a higher proportion of FAD sets 
than seen in recent years, across each of the fishing effort-based 
alternatives (Table 1). The proportion of total sets that would occur 
on FADs across this range would be equal to 0, 20, 40 and 60 percent of 
the total number of sets made. FAD restrictions leading to 40 percent 
of total sets on FADs would be similar to the FAD restrictions 
experienced by the fleet over the last five years (average 38 percent 
of sets on FADs, 2013-2017) when a range of FAD management measures 
were in place. The 20 percent and 60 percent FAD set proportions bound 
the range of FAD set proportions for the fleet over during the last 
decade (min 27 percent, max 54 percent, 2008-2017). The full 
prohibition level (0 percent FAD sets) ensures the complete range of 
potential FAD restrictions will be analyzed in the EIS.
    These proposed action alternatives, related to controls on the type 
and amount of fishing, are meant to capture the full range of 
foreseeable future management measures in the fishery. By combining a 
wide range of fishing effort levels and FAD restrictions into these 
proposed action alternatives (Table 1), the impact analysis should be 
relevant to a wide range of future management measures related to 
effort or FAD restrictions. NMFS interprets these fishing effort and 
FAD restrictions as proxies for other types of management measures, 
meaning the application of the impact analysis can be wider still. For 
example, fishing effort levels would be directly applicable to 
management measures specifying skipjack tuna or yellowfin tuna catch 
limits as well as a range of time and area closures. FAD restrictions--
measured as proportion of sets on FADS--are proxies for bigeye tuna and 
yellowfin tuna catch limits, FAD design or material specification, and 
a range of FAD set closure times and/or locations. With this approach, 
nearly all foreseeable future management measures can be evaluated 
relative to the environmental impacts of these proposed action 
alternatives.

[[Page 42643]]

  Table 1--The Amount of Fishing Effort, in Fishing Days, and Number of
 FAD Sets Under Proposed Action and No-Action Alternatives That Control
the Type and Amount of Fishing To Be Analyzed in an Environmental Impact
             Statement for the U.S. WCPO Purse Seine Fishery
------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                          Fishing effort   Number of FAD
               Alternative                (fishing days)       sets
------------------------------------------------------------------------
No Action A.............................               0             n/a
    Action 1a...........................           5,000               0
    Action 1b...........................           5,000           1,000
    Action 1c...........................           5,000           2,000
    Action 1d...........................           5,000           3,000
No Action B.............................           7,000           2,800
    Action 2a...........................           9,000               0
    Action 2b...........................           9,000           1,800
    Action2c............................           9,000           3,600
    Action 2d...........................           9,000           5,400
    Action 3a...........................          12,000               0
    Action 3b...........................          12,000           2,400
    Action 3c...........................          12,000           4,800
    Action 3d...........................          12,000           7,200
------------------------------------------------------------------------

Control of Allocation and Use of Fishing Privileges
    One of the most significant amendments to the Treaty in 2016 is the 
way that vessel owners obtain and pay for fishing privileges--fishing 
days--in the EEZs of the PIPs. As described previously, both upfront 
and additional days are available under the Treaty to U.S. purse seine 
vessels. The Treaty specifies requirements for the timing of 
notification of upfront fishing day commitments, transfers of upfront 
fishing days among vessel owners, and notifications of additional 
fishing day arrangements. In the first two years under the amended 
Treaty (2017 and 2018), vessel owners have collaborated to allocate the 
available upfront days amongst themselves, conduct in-season transfers 
of those days, and communicate both information on upfront and 
additional day arrangements to NMFS. NMFS has provided owners with 
updates on day usage as well as helped informally resolve issues that 
arise over fishing days between U.S. vessels owners and PIPs, based on 
data available to NMFS.
    NMFS is proposing to evaluate alternative approaches for 
allocation, transfers and use tracking of fishing privileges under the 
Treaty. These alternatives would address the following considerations: 
(1) Timely provision of information to meet requirements and 
obligations of the United States under the Treaty, decisions of the 
Commission and other U.S. law; (2) addressing and resolving allocation 
disputes; (3) addressing vessels joining or leaving the fishery; (4) 
providing flexibility to fleet participants with respect to obtaining 
and using fishing days from PIPs; and (5) minimizing regulatory burden 
and cost.
    NMFS is considering evaluation of three alternative allocation and 
use tracking approaches that would fulfill the requirements defined 
above. These approaches are action alternatives that would first be 
compared separately and then discussed relative to any differential 
impact they would have on the human environment when combined with the 
no-action and action alternatives in Table 1. Like the control of type 
and amount of fishing alternatives, these control of allocation and use 
alternatives are intended to bound the full range of possibilities for 
analysis; and proceed from the lowest to highest level of NMFS 
oversight. The three proposed alternatives are:
    1. An industry-led allocation and use tracking method, where 
decisions related to allocation, transfers and tracking of available 
fishing privileges were made by an organization of fishery participants 
based on approaches they collectively specified;
    2. A collaborative industry-NMFS approach where NMFS would 
facilitate industry decisions regarding allocation, transfer, and use 
through both regulatory and non-regulatory mechanisms; and
    3. A specified allocation, transfer and use-tracking approach 
primarily under NMFS management and oversight.
    Besides comments on these three proposed allocation and use 
alternatives, NMFS is specifically requesting comment on two additional 
aspects of these alternatives. The first concerns allocation and use of 
fishing privileges. Treaty and implementing agreements currently allow 
for assignment of vessel days at the U.S. vessel owner level. Tracking 
at the vessel owner level provides flexibility for those owners that 
have multiple vessels, but complicates the tracking of fishing day use 
as there are not vessel specific limits to monitor. NMFS seeks comment 
on the appropriate ``level'' for allocation and use tracking of fishing 
privileges in these proposed alternatives; be it the vessel, the vessel 
owner or some other level. Second, the numbers of U.S. EEZ and high 
seas fishing days available to the fleet in the WCPO have been limited 
since 2009 in accordance with decisions of the Commission. These 
limited fishing privileges have not previously been subject to 
allocation and are fished in an ``Olympic'' or ``derby'' style; meaning 
that they are available on a first-come, first-served basis to vessels 
that are permitted to fish in those areas. NMFS is also seeking comment 
on whether the proposed alternatives for control of allocation and use 
of fishing privileges should be extended from considering only 
privileges under Treaty to include fishing privileges in the U.S. EEZ 
and on the high seas in the WCPO--to the extent it is limited under 
WCPFC or other decisions.
    NMFS recognizes that consultation and collaboration with U.S. purse 
seine vessel owners and operators on the approaches for allocation of 
effort in this fishery is needed, and sees this notice of intent to 
develop an EIS as an initial step in this process. The public comment 
received through this notice of intent and analysis of alternatives for 
allocation and use of fishing privileges in this EIS will inform future 
NMFS-industry discussions.

Summary

    Given the wide range of potential future management approaches in 
this fishery, NMFS is proposing action alternatives that span the broad 
range of management measures foreseeable under U.S. regulations to 
implement the

[[Page 42644]]

Treaty, decisions of the Commission, and other U.S. law. In total, NMFS 
has tentatively identified two no-action alternatives, three action 
alternatives related to controls on the type and amount of fishing 
(Table 1), and three alternatives related to the allocation and use of 
fishing privileges. NMFS plans to analyze the environmental 
consequences of implementing each of the alternatives by assessing the 
direct, indirect, and cumulative effects of each to the human 
environment in the Western and Central Pacific Ocean.
    By evaluating alternatives that span the full range of reasonably 
foreseeable future management measures, the environmental impacts of 
future management actions not explicitly analyzed could be estimated 
relative to those calculated in this EIS.

    Authority: 42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.

    Dated: August 20, 2018.
Margo B. Schulze-Haugen,
Acting Director, Office of Sustainable Fisheries, National Marine 
Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 2018-18194 Filed 8-22-18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-P
```