alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 3364

To provide for adjustment of immigration status for certain Haitian children.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

OCTOBER 26, 1993

Mrs. MEEK introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee

on the Judiciary

A BILL

To provide for adjustment of immigration status for certain

Haitian children.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. ADJUSTMENT OF IMMIGRATION STATUS FOR

4 CERTAIN HAITIAN CHILDREN.

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—The status of any alien described

6 in subsection (b) shall be adjusted by the Attorney Gen7 eral, under such regulations as the Attorney General may

8 prescribe, to that of an alien lawfully admitted for perma9 nent residence if—
2

•HR 3364 IH

1 (1) the alien applies for such adjustment within

2 18 months after the date of the enactment of this

3 Act;

4 (2) the alien is otherwise eligible to receive an

5 immigrant visa and is otherwise admissible to the

6 United States for permanent residence, except in de7 termining such admissibility the grounds for exclu8 sion specified in paragraphs (4), (5), (6), and (7)(A)

9 of section 212(a) of the Immigration and Nationality

10 Act shall not apply and the Attorney General may,

11 in his or her discretion, waive any other provision of

12 such section (other than paragraph (2)(C) and sub13 paragraphs (A), (B), (C), or (E) of paragraph (3))

14 with respect to such an adjustment for humanitarian

15 purposes or to assure family unity;

16 (3) the alien is not an alien described in section

17 243(h)(2) of the Immigration and Nationality Act;

18 (4) the alien is physically present in the United

19 States on the date the application for such adjust20 ment is filed; and

21 (5) the alien is residing with a parent who is a

22 citizen or permanent resident of the United States.

23 (b) ALIENS ELIGIBLE FOR ADJUSTMENT OF STA24 TUS.—The benefits provided by subsection (a) shall apply

25 to any alien—
3

•HR 3364 IH

1 (1) who is a national of Haiti; and

2 (2) who qualifies for a visa under section

3 203(a)(1) or (a)(2) of the Immigration and Nation4 ality Act as the unmarried son, daughter, or child of

5 a citizen or permanent resident of the United States.

6 (c) APPLICATION OF IMMIGRATION AND NATIONAL7 ITY ACT PROVISIONS.—Except as otherwise specifically

8 provided in this section, the definitions contained in the

9 Immigration and Nationality Act shall apply in the admin10 istration of this section.

11 (d) NO OFFSET IN NUMBER OF VISAS AVAILABLE.—

12 When an alien is granted the status of having been law13 fully admitted for permanent residence pursuant to this

14 section, the Secretary of State shall not be required to re15 duce the number of immigrant visas authorized to be is16 sued under the Immigration and Nationality Act and the

17 Attorney General shall not be required to charge the alien

18 any fee.

Æ
EXHIBIT 32.2

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                                  PURSUANT TO
                            18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Jessica Bradshaw, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge,
Guru Health Inc.'s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A for the quarter ended August
31, 2011 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that

     (1)  The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.


Date: October 20, 2011                      /s/ Jessica Bradshaw
                                           -------------------------------------
                                    Name:  Jessica Bradshaw
                                    Title: Secretary, Treasurer Chief Financial
                                           Officer, Director
**EXHIBIT 31.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

 

I, Robert A. Hamwee, Chief Executive Officer of New Mountain Finance Corporation, certify that:

 

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of New Mountain Finance Corporation;

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

 

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

 

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

 

c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

 

a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

 

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

 

Dated this day of November 14, 2011

 

 

| /s/ Robert A. Hamwee |
|----------------------|
| **Robert A. Hamwee** |

 

----
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 03-1839

LAWYERS TITLE INSURANCE CORPORATION, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus ROBERT L. HAIRE; MARY JO HAIRE, Defendants - Appellants. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District ofMaryland, at Baltimore. Catherine C. Blake, District Judge. (CA02-4111-CCB) Submitted: February 27, 2004 Decided: August 30, 2004 Before WIDENER, TRAXLER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Onkar N. Sharma, SHARMA & BHANDARI, Silver Spring, Maryland, for Appellants. Gerald W. Heller, Jessica N. Drexler, LINOWES AND BLOCHER, L.L.P., Bethesda, Maryland, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: Robert L. Haire and Mary Jo Haire appeal from the district court’s order granting summary judgment in favor of Lawyers Title Insurance Corporation on Lawyers Title’s claims for breach of contract, negligent misrepresentation, indemnity, and breach of guaranty arising out of the Haires’ sale of real estate. We have reviewed the parties’ briefs, the joint appendix, and the district court’s opinion and orders and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Lawyers Title Ins. Corp. v. Haire , No. CA-02-4111-CCB (D. Md. June 18, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
U.S. flag
              An official website of the United States government Skip to main content   end of header Census.gov Newsroom Releases News Conferences
 Newsroom Archive
 Skip left menu navigation
 About the Newsroom
 				Facts for Features
 				News Releases
 				**Press Kits**
 				Tip Sheets
 **Event Materials** Presentation:
National   [PDF] | Northern Virginia [PDF] Media Advisory: Census Bureau Webinar to Highlight Characteristics of Businesses and Business Owners News Release: Half of U.S. Respondent Businesses Were Home-Based, Majority Self-Financed, Census Bureau Reports Charts:  
    - Chart 1.  Characteristics of Businesses and Business Owners, Types of Workers Used: 2007 [PDF]
    - Chart 2.  Characteristics of Businesses and Business Owners,Owner's Service-Disabled Veteran Status by Gender: 2007 [PDF]
    - Chart 3.  Characteristics of Businesses and Business Owners, Owner's Education Background by Gender: 2007 [PDF]
    - Chart 4.  Family-Owned Businesses for Select Ownership Groups: 2007 [PDF]
    - Chart 5.  Businesses Operating as a Franchise in Selected Industries: 2007 [PDF]
    - Chart 6.  Home-Based Firms by Receipts Size: 2007 [PDF] 
       - Chart 7.  Family-Owned Firms by Industry: 2007 [PDF]
    - Chart 8.  Home-Based Businesses in Selected Industries: 2007 [PDF] Speaker Biographies: 
   - Thomas L. Mesenbourg Jr., Deputy Director, U.S. Census Bureau
   - David Hinson, national director, Minority Business Development Agency
   - Stanley Rolark, Chief, Public Information Office, U.S. Census Bureau
   - Lee Wentela, Branch Chief, Company Statistics Division, U.S. Census Bureau
   - Anthony Caruso, Project Manager, Company Statistics Division, U.S. Census Bureau
   - Katherine Russell, Project Manager, Survey of Business Owners and Self-Employed Persons,    U.S. Census Bureau Background Materials Minority Business Development Agency
Searching and Accessing Survey of Business Owners Data on American FactFinder [PDF]
Survey of Business Owners Web site
Census Bureau Blog entry: Half of U.S. Businesses Operated from the Home
 
 CONNECT WITH US

Information Quality
                    Data Linkage Infrastructure
                    Data Protection and Privacy Policy
                    Accessibility      
                    FOIA
                    Inspector General
                    No FEAR Act
                    U.S. Department of Commerce
                    USA.gov
                   Measuring America's People, Places, and Economy
#### Clyde P. DAVIS, as next friend and parent of Clint Davis, a minor, Appellant, v. Charles P. ZONA and Ace Glass and Mirror Company, Inc., a Florida corporation, Appellees.

No. 7169.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Second District.

April 19, 1967.

Rehearing Denied May 16, 1967.

George T. Swartz, of Allen, Knudsen, Swartz, Richardson & DeBoest, Fort Myers, for appellant.

Robert T. Shafer, Jr., of Henderson, Franklin, Starnes & Holt, Fort Myers, for appellees.

PER CURIAM:

The appellant, plaintiff below, appeals from a final judgment entered on a jury *44verdict in favor of appellees, defendants below.

Appellant alleges prejudicial error in the ruling by the trial court at the pretrial conference that each side of the case would be limited to three peremptory challenges.

Appellees have moved to dismiss this appeal on the ground that the record before this court does not include the judicial act sought to be reviewed. Upon examination, we find that the original record1 does not contain a reported transcript of the pre-trial conference or a pretrial order. The rule is well settled that when relief is sought on appeal the appellant must provide the court with an adequate record for review. Morceau v. Meader, 179 So.2d 242 (D.C.A.Fla.1965), Gleim v. Gleim, 176 So.2d 610 (D.C.A.Fla. 1965). Finding no basis in the record upon which to consider the merits of this appeal, the motion to dismiss the appeal is granted.

SHANNON, Acting C. J., and LILES and HOBSON, JJ., concur.
#### Lilian BORNSTEIN, Appellant, v. Fotis CONSTANTIN, Appellee.

No. 71-864.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Oct. 1, 1971.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Elizabeth A. Weaver

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway, Justices

Order 

June 11, 2010 

140296 

GREGORY J. BOWENS, PAULA M. 

BRIDGES, and GARY A. BROWN, 

Plaintiffs-Appellees, 

and 

ROBERT B. DUNLAP and PHILLIP A. 

TALBERT, 

 Plaintiffs, 

v SC: 140296 

 COA: 282711 

Wayne CC: 02-233251-CZ 

ARY, INC., d/b/a AFTERMATH 

ENTERTAINMENT, PHILLIP J. 

ATWELL, CHRONIC 2001 TOURING, 

INC., GERONIMO FILM PRODUCTIONS, 

INC., and ANDRE YOUNG, 

 Defendants-Appellants, 

and 

AMAZON.COM, INC., AOL TIME WARNER, 

INC., BARNES & NOBLE, INC., BARNES & 

NOBLE.COM, INC., BEST BUY COMPANY, 

INC., BLOCKBUSTER, INC., BORDERS GROUP, 

INC., CDNOW, INC., JOHN DOE #1, 

JOHN DOE #2, EAGLE ROCK 

ENTERTAINMENT, EAGLE VISION, INC., 

HARMONY HOUSE RECORDS & TAPES, 

HASTINGS ENTERTAINMENT, INC., 

HMV MEDIA GROUP, HONIGMAN MILLER 

SCHWARTZ & COHN, L.L.P., HOUSE OF 

BLUES CONCERTS/HEWITT/SILVA, L.L.C., 

INGRAM ENTERTAINMENT HOLDINGS, 

INTERSCOPE RECORDS, INC., ERVIN 

JOHNSON, MAGIC JOHNSON PRODUCTIONS, 

L.L.C., METROPOLITAN ENTERTAINMENT 

GROUP, INC., MGA, INC., MOVIE 

GALLERY.COM, INC., MTS, INC/TOWER 

RECORDS, THE MUSICLAND GROUP, INC., 

PANAVISION, INC., RADIO EVENTS GROUP, 

INC., RED DISTRIBUTION, INC., PHIL 

ROBINSON, WILLIAM SILVA, TRANS WORLD 
I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

June 11, 2010 

p0608 

 

2

ENTERTAINMENT CORPORATION, KIRDIS 

TUCKER, WHEREHOUSE ENTERTAINMENT, 

INC., and WH SMITH, P.L.C., 

Defendants. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the September 24, 2009 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is GRANTED. The parties shall 

include among the issues to be briefed: (1) whether, as a matter of law, the videotaped 

conversation in question was a “private conversation” or “private discourse” for purposes 

of the eavesdropping statutes, MCL 750.539a, et seq.; and (2) whether, and under what 

circumstances, a public-official- or police-plaintiff possesses a reasonable expectation of 

privacy under MCL 750.539c in conversations with private citizens in pursuit of official 

business in enforcing state or local laws and ordinances.
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 99-25

                  TWELFTH AMENDMENT TO TRUST AGREEMENT BETWEEN
                      FIDELITY MANAGEMENT TRUST COMPANY AND
                           THE DETROIT EDISON COMPANY

      THIS TWELTH AMENDMENT, dated as of the first day of August, 2000, by and
between Fidelity Management Trust Company (the "Trustee") and The Detroit Edison
Company (the "Sponsor");

                                   WITNESSETH:

      WHEREAS, the Trustee and the Sponsor heretofore entered into a Trust
Agreement dated June 30, 1994, as amended with regard to The Detroit Edison
Savings & Investment Plan, The Detroit Edison Savings & Investment Plan for
Employees Represented by Local 17 of the International Brotherhood of Electrical
Workers, and The Detroit Edison Savings & Investment Plan for Employees
Represented by Local 223 of the Utility Workers Union of America (collectively
and individually, the "Plan"): and

      WHEREAS, the Trustee and the Sponsor now desire to amend said Trust
Agreement as provided for in Section 14 thereof;

      NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the above premises the Trustee and the
Sponsor hereby amend the Trust Agreement by:

      (1)   Amending the "Other" Section of Schedule "A" to add the following:

            -     For terminated and retired participants with outstanding
                  loans: Fidelity shall provide to these participants a loan
                  coupon book for the purpose of scheduling and processing loan
                  repayments.

      IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Trustee and the Sponsor have caused this Twelfth
Amendment to be executed by their duly authorized officers effective as of the
day and year first above written.

THE DETROIT EDISON COMPANY    FIDELITY MANAGEMENT TRUST
                              COMPANY

By   /s/ Darrell K. Ferrell         By  /s/ Carolyn Redden
     ------------------                 -----------------------------
     Darrell K. Ferrell                 Carolyn Redden
     Date July 11, 2000                 Vice President   Date 2/18/00

Detroit Edison-LPS
Twelfth Amendment
#### Davis *v.*Industrial Health, Accident and Life Insurance Co., Appellant.

Appeal No. 380,

Before Trexler, P. J., Keller, Cunningham, Baldrige, Stadteeld and Parker, JJ.

January 4, 1935:

Opinion by

Baldrige, J.,

This action was tried with that of Florence Davis v.. The State Mutual Benefit Society. The same facts and legal principles are involved in both cases. We have filed an opinion this day in that case, and for the. reasons therein set forth, judgment of the court below is affirmed.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1



                    CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

         As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the
incorporation by reference in this registration statement of our report dated
December 27, 1999 (except with respect to the matter discussed in Note A, for
which the date is August 7, 2000) included in SatCon Technology Corporation's
Form 10-K, as amended, for the year ended September 30, 1999.

                                        /s/ Arthur Andersen LLP

Boston, Massachusetts
August 14, 2000
# C_2012305EN.01001301.xml

| 10.10.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 305/13 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.10.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 305/13

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

9 October 2012

2012/C 305/04

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,2953 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 101,35 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4575 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,80790 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 8,6117 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,2111 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 7,4050 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 24,936 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 283,40 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,6963 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,0777 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,5675 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,3490 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,2663 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,2632 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 10,0422 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,5770 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,5913 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 439,28 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 11,3321 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 8,1465 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,4865 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 12 445,44 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 3,9805 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 53,646 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 40,2740 |
| THB | Thai baht | 39,701 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 2,6289 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 16,5661 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 68,2779 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,2953

JPY

Japanese yen

101,35

DKK

Danish krone

7,4575

GBP

Pound sterling

0,80790

SEK

Swedish krona

8,6117

CHF

Swiss franc

1,2111

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

7,4050

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

24,936

HUF

Hungarian forint

283,40

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,6963

PLN

Polish zloty

4,0777

RON

Romanian leu

4,5675

TRY

Turkish lira

2,3490

AUD

Australian dollar

1,2663

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,2632

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

10,0422

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,5770

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,5913

KRW

South Korean won

1 439,28

ZAR

South African rand

11,3321

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

8,1465

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,4865

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

12 445,44

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

3,9805

PHP

Philippine peso

53,646

RUB

Russian rouble

40,2740

THB

Thai baht

39,701

BRL

Brazilian real

2,6289

MXN

Mexican peso

16,5661

INR

Indian rupee

68,2779

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
#### WKAT, INC., a Florida corporation, and Lee Vogel, Appellants, v. Leonard H. RUBIN, Appellee.

No. 69-23.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Third District.

April 1, 1969.

Rehearing Denied April 18, 1969.

*22Tobias Simon, Scott, McCarthy, Steel, Hector & Davis, Miami, for appellants.

Ronald S. Golub, Miami, for appellee.

Before PEARSON, HENDRY and SWANN, JJ.

PEARSON, Judge.

This cause was set for oral argument before the court. Prior to argument we noted an apparent lack of jurisdiction. We thereupon removed the cause from the calendar and requested the parties to file briefs concerning this court’s jurisdiction to consider an appeal from the following order:

> “THIS CAUSE came on to be heard before the Court upon the Plaintiff’s motion for partial summary judgment and upon the Defendants’ motion for summary judgment; and the Court having heard argument of counsel and having examined the pleadings, affidavits and depositions contained in the file, finds that the doctrine as first enunciated New York Times v. Sullivan, 376 U.S. 254 [84 S.Ct. 710, 11 L.Ed.2d 686], and as later enunciated in subsequent cases, is not applicable at the case at bar, and therefore, the Court being fully advised in the premises, it is, upon consideration

> “ORDERED that the aforesaid motions be and the same are hereby denied, except as above set forth.”

Appellants frame the issue before us concisely:

> “Rule 4.2a, Florida Appellate Rules, allows interlocutory appeals ‘ * * * from orders granting partial summary judgment on liability in civil actions, * * * >

> “If the language of Rule 4.2a quoted above allows an interlocutory appeal from an order which disposes of some, but not all, issues of liability, this appeal lies. If that language in Rule 4.2a allows an interlocutory appeal only from an order completely disposing of all issues of liability against the defending party, the order of the lower court is not appealable.”

They urge the first of these interpretations on this court.

We think such an interpretation is not justified by the language of the rule. We think further that the interpretation urged would allow interlocutory appeals from every order in a common law case which in any way touched upon liability. Such orders may be entered at many stages in the trial of a common law case. The broad use of interlocutory appeals suggested is not within the traditional framework of the trial of a common law case. The resulting delay in the disposition of cases would be unfortunate.

We think the Supreme Court intended to permit interlocutory appeals from orders granting partial summary judgment on liability in civil cases only when those orders are completely dispositive of the issue of liability.

Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed.

It is so ordered.