43414 Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 142 / Tuesday, July 24, 2012 / Notices 

Dated: July 18, 2012. 

Thomas M. Countryman, 

Assistant Secretary of State for International 

Security and Nonproliferation. 

[FR Doc. 2012–18041 Filed 7–23–12; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4710–25–P 

DEPARTMENT OF STATE 

[Public Notice 7962] 

Bureau of Political-Military Affairs; 

Statutory Debarment Under the Arms 

Export Control Act and the 

International Traffic in Arms 

Regulations 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that 

the Department of State has imposed 

statutory debarment pursuant to 

§ 127.7(c) of the International Traffic in 

Arms Regulations (‘‘ITAR’’) (22 CFR 

Parts 120 to 130) on persons convicted 

of violating, or conspiracy to violate, 

Section 38 of the Arms Export Control 

Act, as amended (‘‘AECA’’) (22 U.S.C. 

2778). Further, a public notice was 

published in the Federal Register on 

Tuesday, November 15, 2011, listing 

persons statutorily debarred pursuant to 

the ITAR; this notice makes one 

correction to that notice. 

DATES: Effective Date: The effective date 

is the date of this notice. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Lisa 

Aguirre, Director, Office of Defense 

Trade Controls Compliance, Bureau of 

Political-Military Affairs, Department of 

State (202) 632–2798. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Section 

38(g)(4) of the AECA, 22 U.S.C. 

2778(g)(4), prohibits the Department of 

State from issuing licenses or other 

approvals for the export of defense 

articles or defense services where the 

applicant, or any party to the export, has 

been convicted of violating certain 

statutes, including the AECA. The 

statute permits limited exceptions to be 

made on a case-by-case basis. In 

implementing this provision, Section 

127.7 of the ITAR provides for 

‘‘statutory debarment’’ of any person 

who has been convicted of violating or 

conspiring to violate the AECA. Persons 

subject to statutory debarment are 

prohibited from participating directly or 

indirectly in the export of defense 

articles, including technical data, or in 

the furnishing of defense services for 

which a license or other approval is 

required. 

Statutory debarment is based solely 

upon conviction in a criminal 

proceeding, conducted by a United 

States Court, and as such the 

administrative debarment procedures 

outlined in Part 128 of the ITAR are not 

applicable. 

The period for debarment will be 

determined by the Assistant Secretary 

for Political-Military Affairs based on 

the underlying nature of the violations, 

but will generally be for three years 

from the date of conviction. Export 

privileges may be reinstated only at the 

request of the debarred person followed 

by the necessary interagency 

consultations, after a thorough review of 

the circumstances surrounding the 

conviction, and a finding that 

appropriate steps have been taken to 

mitigate any law enforcement concerns, 

as required by Section 38(g)(4) of the 

AECA. Unless export privileges are 

reinstated, however, the person remains 

debarred. 

Department of State policy permits 

debarred persons to apply to the 

Director, Office of Defense Trade 

Controls Compliance, for reinstatement 

beginning one year after the date of the 

debarment. Any decision to grant 

reinstatement can be made only after the 

statutory requirements of Section 

38(g)(4) of the AECA have been 

satisfied. 

Exceptions, also known as transaction 

exceptions, may be made to this 

debarment determination on a case-bycase basis at the discretion of the 

Assistant Secretary of State for PoliticalMilitary Affairs, after consulting with 

the appropriate U.S. agencies. However, 

such an exception would be granted 

only after a full review of all 

circumstances, paying particular 

attention to the following factors: 

whether an exception is warranted by 

overriding U.S. foreign policy or 

national security interests; whether an 

exception would further law 

enforcement concerns that are 

consistent with the foreign policy or 

national security interests of the United 

States; or whether other compelling 

circumstances exist that are consistent 

with the foreign policy or national 

security interests of the United States, 

and that do not conflict with law 

enforcement concerns. Even if 

exceptions are granted, the debarment 

continues until subsequent 

reinstatement. 

Pursuant to Section 38(g)(4) of the 

AECA and Section 127.7(c) of the ITAR, 

the following persons are statutorily 

debarred as of the date of this notice 

(Name; Date of Conviction; District; 

Case No.; Month/Year of Birth): 

(1) Miguel Avendano-Reyna; April 30, 

2012; U.S. District Court, Southern 

District of Texas; Case No. 

7:11CR00999–S1–001; April, 1976. 

(2) Davoud Baniameri (aka Davoud 

Baniamery, David Baniameri, David 

Baniamery); August 12, 2011; U.S. 

District Court, Northern District of 

Illinois; Case No. 09–CR–736–1; 

August, 1972. 

(3) Donald V. Bernardo; November 16, 

2011; U.S. District Court, Southern 

District of Florida; Case No. 1:10– 

60331–CR–SEITZ–1; November, 

1938. 

(4) Jorge Blanco-Castillo; September 20, 

2011; U.S. District Court, Southern 

District of Texas; Case No. 

1:11CR00178–001; November, 1969. 

(5) Igor Bobel; May 11, 2012; U.S. 

District Court, Eastern District of 

Pennsylvania; Case No. 11–CR– 

00749–HB–1; February, 1968. 

(6) Oscar Edwardo Cantu; March 21, 

2012; U.S. District Court, Southern 

District of Texas; Case No. 

7:11CR00686–S1–001; March, 1980. 

(7) Henson Chua; November 8, 2011; 

U.S. District Court, Middle District 

of Florida; Case No. 8:11–CR–137– 

T–30AEP; January, 1964. 

(8) Kue Sang Chun; November 15, 2011; 

U.S. District Court, Northern 

District of Ohio; Case No. 

1:11CR00009–001; October, 1943. 

(9) Luz Sylvia Cortez; November 28, 

2011; U.S. District Court, Southern 

District of Texas; Case No. 

7:10CR00061–002; April, 1976. 

(10) Dan Tran Dang; April 16, 2012; U.S. 

District Court, Central District of 

California; Case No. SACR 08– 

00322–CJC; December, 1954. 

(11) Santos Isidro de la Paz; May 11, 

2012; U.S. District Court, Southern 

District of Texas; Case No. 

7:11CR00396–007; September, 

1988. 

(12) Anna Fermanova; October 26, 2011; 

U.S. District Court, Eastern District 

of New York; Case No. CR11– 

00008(CBA); July, 1986. 

(13) Galaxy Aviation Services; June 30, 

2011; U.S. District Court, Middle 

District of Georgia; Case No. 5:10– 

CR–00058–004–MTT; N/A. 

(14) Ruslan Gilchenko; February 4, 

2011; U.S. District Court, District of 

Arizona; Case No. CR10–00233– 

001–PHX–FJM; October, 1976. 

(15) Juan Victorian Gimenez; March 21, 

2012; U.S. District Court, Southern 

District of Florida; Case No. 1:11– 

20669–CR–MARTINEZ–1; October, 

1983. 

(16) Enrique Gustavo Gonzalez; April 

28, 2012; U.S. District Court, 

Southern District of Texas; Case No. 

7:10CR01032–001; September, 

1990. 

(17) Issac Obed Gonzalez; July 11, 2011; 

U.S. District Court, Southern 


sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 142 / Tuesday, July 24, 2012 / Notices 43415 

District of Texas; Case No. 

7:10CR01171–001; October, 1989. 

(18) Steven Neal Greenoe; January 10, 

2012; U.S. District Court, Eastern 

District of North Carolina; Case No. 

5:10–CR–277–1H; November, 1973. 

(19) Stephen Glen Guerra; February 6, 

2012; U.S. District Court, Western 

District of Texas; Case No. W–11– 

CR–200(04); February, 1979. 

(20) Oscar Hernandez-Bravo (aka Oscar 

Bravo Hernandez); April 4, 2012; 

U.S. District Court, Southern 

District of Texas; Case No. 

7:09CR00809–S1–001; February, 

1971. 

(21) Chou-Fu Ho; September 20, 2011; 

U.S. District Court, Southern 

District of California; Case No. 

10CR2415 BTM; September, 1971. 

(22) Rene Huerta, Jr.; August 16, 2011; 

U.S. District Court, Southern 

District of Texas; Case No. 

1:10CR01396–001; October, 1972. 

(23) Liem Duc Huynh (aka Duc Huynh); 

April 17, 2012; U.S. District Court, 

Central District of California; Case 

No. SACR 08–00322–CJC; 

September, 1959. 

(24) Octavio Ibarra-Sanchez; February 

22, 2012; U.S. District Court, 

Southern District of Texas; Case No. 

7:11CR01518–001; March, 1984. 

(25) Phillip Andro Jamison; November 

8, 2011; U.S. District Court, 

Southern District of California; Case 

No. 10CR3618–H; February, 1980. 

(26) Young Su Kim; August 19, 2011; 

U.S. District Court, District of 

Colorado; Case No. 11–cr–00171– 

LTB–01; August, 1953. 

(27) Marc Knapp; September 13, 2011; 

U.S. District Court, District of 

Delaware; Case No. 10CR108–LPS; 

December, 1974. 

(28) Connor H. Kraegel; August 24, 

2011; U.S. District Court, District of 

Maryland; Case No. AW–8–11–CR– 

0273–001; October, 1990. 

(29) Li Li (aka Lea Li); October 3, 2011; 

U.S. District Court, Eastern District 

of Virginia; Case No. 1:10CR00207– 

002; April, 1978. 

(30) Mario Julian Martinez-Bernache; 

March 15, 2012; U.S. District Court, 

Southern District of Texas; Case No. 

1:11CR00759–001; August, 1989. 

(31) Scott Michael Miller; December 1, 

2011; U.S. District Court, Southern 

District of New York; Case No. 06 

Crim. 0566 (DC); August, 1958. 

(32) Placido Molina, Jr.; March 2, 2012; 

U.S. District Court, Southern 

District of Texas; Case No. 

1:11CR00530–001; September, 

1984. 

(33) Balraj Naidu; December 20, 2010; 

U.S. District Court, District of 

Maryland; Case No. CCB–1–08–CR– 

00091–002; February, 1967. 

(34) Jamal Nehme; May 26, 2011; U.S. 

District Court, District of Delaware; 

Case No. 09–CR–74–01 GMS; April, 

1963. 

(35) Joseph Oldani; June 3, 2009; U.S. 

District Court, Southern District of 

West Virginia; Case No. 3:08–00287; 

August, 1987. 

(36) Timothy Oldani; June 3, 2009; U.S. 

District Court, Southern District of 

West Virginia; Case No. 3:09–00010; 

November, 1984. 

(37) John Dennis Tan Ong (aka Dennis 

Ong, John Tan Ong); December 19, 

2011; U.S. District Court, Northern 

District of Georgia; Case No. 1:10– 

cr–352–JEC–01; November, 1973. 

(38) Juan Narcizo Oyervides-Campos; 

November 21, 2011; U.S. District 

Court, Southern District of Texas; 

Case No. 7:11CR00338–001; July, 

1990. 

(39) Manuel Mario Pavon; January 13, 

2012; U.S. District Court, Southern 

District of Texas; Case No. 

7:11CR01434–S–001; June, 1991. 

(40) Jerome Stuart Pendzich; October 12, 

2011; U.S. District Court, Eastern 

District of Tennessee; Case No. 

3:10–CR–168–001; March, 1977. 

(41) Lee Roy Perez; December 13, 2011; 

U.S. District Court, Southern 

District of Texas; Case No. 

7:11CR00389–001; July, 1987. 

(42) Julio Alejandro Quirino; August 31, 

2011; U.S. District Court, Southern 

District of Texas; Case No. 

7:10CR01171–002; November, 1984. 

(43) Ramadan Rama; July 21, 2011; U.S. 

District Court, Eastern District of 

North Carolina; Case No. 5:10–CR– 

397–1D; December, 1970. 

(44) Martin Ramirez-Rodriguez (aka 

Julian Garcia-Penaloza, Alberto 

Moreno-Garza, Machin AguilarGaona); November 9, 2010; U.S. 

District Court, Northern District of 

Florida; Case No. 5:10CR39–002– 

RS; October, 1983. 

(45) Jose Arturo Ramon-Herrada; 

February 24, 2012; U.S. District 

Court, Southern District of Texas; 

Case No. 7:11CR00853–002; 

February, 1983. 

(46) Felix Reyes; July 28, 2011; U.S. 

District Court, Southern District of 

Texas; Case No. 7:10CR01500–001; 

March, 1992. 

(47) Jose Guadalupe Reyes-Martinez; 

November 21, 2011; U.S. District 

Court, Southern District of Texas; 

Case No. 7:11CR00396–010; 

September, 1982. 

(48) Adrian Jesus Reyna; January 27, 

2012; U.S. District Court, Western 

District of Texas; Case No. W–11– 

CR–200(01); July, 1986. 

(49) Gerardo Domingo Rodriguez-Rivera; 

January 13, 2012; U.S. District 

Court, Southern District of Texas; 

Case No. 7:11CR01434–S–002; June, 

1993. 

(50) Nestor Omar Sauceda-Trevino; 

July 18, 2011; U.S. District Court, 

Southern District of Texas; Case No. 

1:11CR00240–001; May, 1990. 

(51) Hamid Seifi, (aka Hank Seifi); 

July 5, 2011; U.S. District Court, Middle 

District of Georgia; Case No. 5:10–CR– 

00058–003–MTT; March, 1963. 

(52) Chan Hok Shek, (aka John Chan); 

September 27, 2011; U.S. District Court, 

District of Massachusetts; Case No. 

1:08–CR–10317–001–DPW; December, 

1953. 

(53) Andrew Silcox; March 1, 2012; 

U.S. District Court, Western District of 

Texas; Case No. SA–11–CR–883(1)FB; 

March, 1958. 

(54) Oscar Sorroza-Garcia; July 5, 

2011; U.S. District Court, Southern 

District of California; Case No. 

09CR3600–BEN; October, 1973. 

(55) Staff Gasket Manufacturing Corp.; 

September 15, 2011; U.S. District Court, 

District of New Jersey; Case No. 2:CR11– 

0256–01; N/A. 

(56) Swiss Technology, Inc.; 

November 15, 2011; U.S. District Court, 

District of New Jersey; Case No. 2:11– 

CR–473–JLL–01; N/A. 

(57) Leonardo Talamantez; April 23, 

2012; U.S. District Court, Western 

District of Texas; Case No. DR–11–CR– 

1354(2)–AM; July, 1986. 

(58) The Parts Guys, LLC; November 

3, 2011; U.S. District Court, Middle 

District of Georgia; Case No. 5:10–CR– 

00058–002–MTT; N/A. 

(59) Michael Edward Todd; November 

8, 2011; U.S. District Court, Middle 

District of Georgia; Case No. 5:10–CR– 

00058–001–MTT; June, 1980. 

(60) Alfonso Torres; May 12, 2012; 

U.S. District Court, Southern District of 

Texas; Case No. 7:11CR00687–001; 

October, 1970. 

(61) Hong Wei Xian, (aka Harry Zan); 

October 3, 2011; U.S. District Court, 

Eastern District of Virginia; Case No. 

1:10CR00207–001; December, 1978. 

(62) Lian Yang; October 27, 2011; U.S. 

District Court, Western District of 

Washington; Case No. 

2:11CR00094TSZ–001; February, 1964. 

(63) Nguessan Yao; December 15, 

2011; U.S. District Court, Northern 

District of California; Case No. CR–10– 

00434–002; January, 1955. 

(64) Edgar Daniel Zapata; April 30, 

2012; U.S. District Court, Southern 

District of Texas; Case No. 

7:11CR00396–001; August, 1980. 

As noted above, at the end of the 

three-year period following the date of 

this notice, the above named persons/ 

entities remain debarred unless export 

privileges are reinstated. 


sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
43416 Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 142 / Tuesday, July 24, 2012 / Notices 

Debarred persons are generally 

ineligible to participate in activity 

regulated under the ITAR (see e.g., 

sections 120.1(c) and (d), and 127.11(a)). 

Also, under Section 127.1(c) of the 

ITAR, any person who has knowledge 

that another person is subject to 

debarment or is otherwise ineligible 

may not, without disclosure to and 

written approval from the Directorate of 

Defense Trade Controls, participate, 

directly or indirectly, in any export in 

which such ineligible person may 

benefit there from or have a direct or 

indirect interest therein. 

Further, Federal Register document 

2011–29470, published at 76 FR 70805, 

Tuesday, November 15, 2011, is 

corrected on page 70807, line 12 

through line 15 to read as follows: 

1. Andrew V. ODonnell; August 1, 

2011; U.S. District Court, Northern 

District of Georgia; Case No. 1:10–CR– 

491–CAP; July, 1977. 

That notice of statutory debarment 

incorrectly identified the debarred party 

as ‘‘Andrew V. O’Donnell’’ and the 

Month/Year of birth of the debarred 

party as ‘‘July, 1997.’’ 

This notice is provided for purposes 

of making the public aware that the 

persons listed above are prohibited from 

participating directly or indirectly in 

activities regulated by the ITAR, 

including any brokering activities and 

in any export from or temporary import 

into the United States of defense 

articles, related technical data, or 

defense services in all situations 

covered by the ITAR. Specific case 

information may be obtained from the 

Office of the Clerk for the U.S. District 

Courts mentioned above and by citing 

the court case number where provided. 

Dated: July 17, 2012. 

Andrew J. Shapiro, 

Assistant Secretary, Bureau of PoliticalMilitary Affairs, Department of State. 

[FR Doc. 2012–18043 Filed 7–23–12; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4710–25–P 

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES 

TRADE REPRESENTATIVE 

Notice of Meeting of the Industry Trade 

Advisory Committee on Small and 

Minority Business (ITAC–11) 

AGENCY: Office of the United States 

Trade Representative. 

ACTION: Notice of a partially opened 

meeting. 

SUMMARY: The Industry Trade Advisory 

Committee on Small and Minority 

Business (ITAC–11) will hold a meeting 

on Friday, August 10, 2012, from 9:00 

a.m. to 4:00 p.m. The meeting will be 

opened to the public from 1:00 p.m. to 

4:00 p.m. 

DATES: The meeting is scheduled for 

August 10, 2012, unless otherwise 

notified. 

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at 

the University Club Atop Symphony 

Towers, San Diego, CA. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Laura Hellstern, DFO for ITAC–11 at 

(202) 482–3222, Department of 

Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution 

Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The 

Agenda topics to be discussed are: 

—Pre-Decisional Deliberations on a 

draft Letter of Recommendation on 

U.S. & Foreign Commercial Service 

Proposed New Increases in Fees. 

—Access to and use of U.S. Small 

Business Administration State Trade 

and Export Promotion (STEP) Grants 

by San Diego-area business. 

—Congressional perspective on trade 

barriers for small and minority 

business. 

—Update on pending trade legislation 

that would impact small and minority 

businesses. 

Christine L. Turner, 

Assistant U.S. Trade Representative, 

Intergovernmental Affairs and Public 

Engagement. 

[FR Doc. 2012–18016 Filed 7–23–12; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3190–W2–P 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

Office of the Secretary 

[Docket DOT–OST–2010–0235] 

Application of Star Marianas Air, Inc. 

for Commuter Authority 

AGENCY: Department of Transportation. 

ACTION: Notice of Order to Show Cause 

(Order 2012–7–21). 

SUMMARY: The Department of 

Transportation is directing all interested 

persons to show cause why it should 

not issue an order tentatively finding 

Star Marianas Air, Inc., fit, willing, and 

able to provide scheduled passenger 

service as a commuter air carrier using 

small aircraft pursuant to Part 135 of the 

Federal Aviation Regulations. 

DATES: Persons wishing to file 

objections should do so no later than 

July 31, 2012. 

ADDRESSES: Objections and answers to 

objections should be filed in Docket 

DOT–OST–2010–0235 and addressed to 

U.S. Department of Transportation, 

Docket Operations, (M–30, Room W12– 

140), 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., West 

Building Ground Floor, Washington, DC 

20590, and should be served upon the 

parties listed in Attachment A to the 

order. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Catherine J. O’Toole, Air Carrier Fitness 

Division (X–56, Room W86–489), U.S. 

Department of Transportation, 1200 

New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, 

DC 20590, (202) 366–9721. 

Dated: July 17, 2012. 

Susan L. Kurland, 

Assistant Secretary for Aviation and 

International Affairs. 

[FR Doc. 2012–18042 Filed 7–23–12; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE P 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

ITS Industry Forum on Connected 

Vehicles: Moving From Research 

Towards Implementation; Notice of 

Public Meeting 

AGENCY: ITS Joint Program Office, 

Research and Innovative Technology 

Administration, U.S. Department of 

Transportation. 

ACTION: Notice. 

The U.S. Department of 

Transportation (USDOT) Intelligent 

Transportation System Joint Program 

Office (ITS JPO) will host a free public 

meeting and webinar to provide updates 

and promote a lively discussion on the 

Connected Vehicle Safety, Vehicle-toInfrastructure, and Testing programs; 

along with a special session discussing 

lessons learned in deploying ITS. The 

public meeting will take place 

September 25–27, 2012, 9:00 a.m.–4:30 

p.m. at the Hyatt Regency Chicago, 151 

East Wacker Drive, Chicago, Illinois, 

USA 60601, 312–565–1234. Persons 

planning to attend the meeting or 

participate in the webinar should 

register online at www.itsa.org/ 

safetymeeting no later than August 30, 

2012. 

The goal of the meeting and webinar 

is to identify where we are and what 

remains in getting to the 2013 decision 

on Vehicle Communications for Safety, 

discuss what is evolving in terms of a 

robust Vehicle-to-Infrastructure 

environment, and identify what we have 

learned from past ITS deployments that 

can help with success for the future. 

About the Connected Vehicle Research 

Program at USDOT 

Connected Vehicle research at 

USDOT is a multimodal program that 

involves using wireless communication 

between vehicles, infrastructure, and 

personal communications devices to 


sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES