alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
S ee T EX . R. A PP . P

. 52 .8 ( d ) ( “ W h e n d e ny ing relief, t he c our t m ay han d do w n an opi nion but is not 1 re q u i re d to d o s o .”); T EX . R. A PP . P

. 4 7

. 4 (d i s t i n g u i s h i n g o p i n i o n s a n d m e m o ra n d u m o p i n i o n s ). 

### NU M BER 1 3 - 0 9 - 0 0 3 8 0 - CR 

## CO URT O F AP P E ALS THI RTE E NTH DI S TRI CT O F T E XAS CO RP US CHRI S TI -E DI NBURG I N R E T HE ST AT E O F T EX AS EX REL . ST EP HEN B . T YL ER, CR I M I NA L DI ST RI CT AT T O RN EY O F VI CT O RI A C O UN T Y, T EX AS

O n P et i t i o n fo rW r i t

o f Man d am u s. M E M ORA N D U M OP I N I ON B efo r e Ju st i ces R o d r i g u ez , G ar z a, an d V el a P erC ur i am Me mo r andu m O pi ni on 1 Rel at or , t he S t at e of

T exas ex r el

. S t ephen B

. Tyl er , C r i m i nal D i st r i ct A t t or ney of V i ct or i a C ount y, T exas, f i l ed a pet i t i on forw r i tof m andam us i n t he above cause on Jul y 7, 2009. T he C ourt r equest ed and r ecei ved a r esponse t o t he pet i t i on forw r i tof m andam us fr o m th e C i tyo f V i cto ri a , t h e r e a l p a rt yi n i n te re s t.2

M andam us r el i ef

m ay be gr ant ed i f

t he r el at orshows t hat : ( 1) t he actsoughtt o be c o m p e lle d is p u r e lym in is t e r ia l; a n d ( 2 ) t h e r e is n o a d e q u a t e r e m e d ya tla w. See D el eon v . Di s t. C l e rk, 187 S

. W

. 3d 473, 474 ( Tex. C r i m . A pp. 2006) ( or i g. pr oceedi ng)

. T he r el at or m ust have a “ cl earr i ght ” t o t he r el i ef sought and t he m er i t s of t he r el i ef soughtm ust be “b e y o n d d i s p u te .” S ee i d. “ The r equi r em ent of a cl ear l egal r i ght necess i t at es t hatt he l aw pl ai nl y desc r i bes t he dut y t o be perfor m ed such t hatt her e i s no r oom fort he exer ci se of d i s c re ti o n .” I d. Ma n d a mu s ma y a l s o i s s u e toc o rr e ct a v o i d o rd e r. Se e , e . g . , Sta t eex r e l. Mi l l sap v. Lozano , 6 9 2 S .W .2 d 4 7 0 , 4 8 2 ( T e x . C ri m. A p p . 1 9 8 5 ). The C ourt , havi ng exam i ned and f ul l y cons i der ed t he pet i t i on for w r i tof m andam us a n d th e r e s p o n s e th e re to , i s o f th e o p i n i o n th a t re l a to r h a s n o t s h o w n h i ms e l f e n ti tl e d to th e re l i e f s o u g h t. Ac c o rd i n g l y , th e p e ti ti o n fo r w ri t o f m a n d a mu s i s D E N IE D

. S ee T EX . R. A PP . P. 5 2 .8 (a ). PER C UR I AM D o n o t p u b l i s h

. S eeT EX . R. A PP . P. 4 7 .2 (b ). M em or andum O pi ni on del i ver ed and f i l ed t hi s 29t h day of

Jul y, 2009.
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Modern Mobility Aids, Inc.  (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended December 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Sergei Khorolski, Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer) of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

| (1) |   | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                 |
|-----|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| (2) |   | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |

 

 

| Dated: February 11, 2011   | By:    | /s/ Sergei Khorolski                                            |
|--------------------------------------|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                 |   | Sergei KhorolskiChief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer) |

 

 

----
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3200 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3200

To renew until January 1, 1996, the previous suspension of duty on 2,2-
      dimethylcyclopropylcarboxamide, also known as D-carboxamide.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 30, 1993

Mr. Kanjorski introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To renew until January 1, 1996, the previous suspension of duty on 2,2-
      dimethylcyclopropylcarboxamide, also known as D-carboxamide.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF PRIOR SUSPENSION OF DUTY.

    Heading 9902.30.68 (relating to 2,2-Dimethylcyclopropylcarboxamide) 
of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by 
striking out ``12/31/92'' and inserting ``12/31/95''.

SEC. 2. APPLICABILITY.

    (a) In General.--The amendment made by section 1 applies with 
respect to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, 
on or after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
    (b) Retroactive Provision.--Notwithstanding section 514 of the 
Tariff Act of 1930 or any other provision of law to the contrary, upon 
a request filed with the appropriate customs officer within 195 days 
after the date of the enactment of this Act, any entry or withdrawal 
from warehouse for consumption of goods to which the amendment made by 
section 1 applies--
            (1) that was made after December 31, 1992, and before the 
        15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act; and
            (2) with respect to which there would have been a lower 
        duty if the amendment made by section 1 had applied to such 
        entry or withdrawal;
shall be liquidated or reliquidated as though such entry or withdrawal 
had occurred on such 15th day.

                                 <all>
```
September 23, 2015

Dear Mr. Holzer:

This letter is to inform y ou that the following informati on is missing from your petition (Docket No. FAA

− 2015

− 2803). This information is necessary for the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) to process your petition.

 Describe the aircraft make(s), model(s) , and type(s) (i.e., fixed-wing, rotorcraft, lighter-than-air) for the proposed UAS operati on. The description(s) should include the maximum weight (including pa yload). This information can be located in the aircraft manual(s).

Please submit the additional information (non-proprietary) to your docket at www.regulations.gov and submit any proprietary information to the FAA Headquarters or electronically via email to 333exemptions@faa.gov. If you want us to process your request any further, we must receive the information desc ribed above by 10/7/15. If we do not receive the information, we will close the doc ket without notifying you further.

If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at (202) 267-4712.

Sincerely,
/s/
Brenda Robeson Program Analyst
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE CONDEN-
SED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS OF AEARO CO. AS OF 6-30-98 (UNAUDITED) AND 9-30
-97 AND THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS (UNAUDITED) FOR THE
9 MOS. ENDED 6-30-98 AND 1997 CONTAINED IN AEARO CO.'S FORM 10-Q FOR THE QUARTER
ENDED 6-30-98, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH 10-Q.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                           5,261
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   44,146
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (1,447)
<INVENTORY>                                     38,780
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                89,993
<PP&E>                                          85,901
<DEPRECIATION>                                (26,570)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 294,298
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           58,000
<BONDS>                                        219,123
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             1
<OTHER-SE>                                      13,630
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   294,298
<SALES>                                        217,803
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               217,803
<CGS>                                          121,973
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  121,973
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                76,138
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              19,698
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    (6)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,302
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (2,308)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (2,308)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (83.25)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (83.25)
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Dynamic Health Products, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the quarterly period ended September
30, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Mandeep K. Taneja, Chief Executive Officer and President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to
ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                     
|-------------------------------------
|/s/ Mandeep K. Taneja                
|Mandeep K. Taneja                    
|Chief Executive Officer and President
|November 15, 2004
#### William WOOD, Jr., Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. T-35.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

July 3, 1973.

William Wood, Jr., in pro per.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., and Michael M. Corin, Asst. Atty. Gen., for ap-pellee.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant seeks reversal of the order denying his post-conviction motion to vacate judgment and sentences.

We have carefully reviewed the record on appeal and the briefs filed by the par*335ties, and it is our conclusion that appellant has failed to demonstrate reversible error in the proceedings below. Accordingly, the order appealed herein is affirmed.

WIGGINTON, Acting C. J., and SPEC-TOR and JOHNSON, JJ., concur.
#### Grace ANDERSON et al., Appellants, v. Jessie James CRAYTON et al., Appellees.

No. 71-333.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Jan. 25, 1972.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
Exhibit 32.3

Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as

Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

Pursuant to 18
U.S.C. § 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Digital Realty Trust, Inc., in its capacity as the sole general partner of Digital Realty Trust, L.P. (the Operating
Partnership), hereby certifies, to such officers knowledge, that:

(i) the accompanying Amendment No. 1 to the Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q of the Operating Partnership for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2012 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the Operating Partnership at the dates and for the periods indicated.

Dated: December 21, 2012



|                                                                                                      
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/    MICHAEL F.
FOUST                                                                               
|Michael F. Foust                                                                                      
|Chief Executive Officer Digital Realty Trust, Inc., sole general partner of Digital Realty Trust,
L.P.

Pursuant to Securities and Exchange Commission Release 33-8238, dated June 5, 2003, this certification is being
furnished and shall not be deemed filed by the Operating Partnership for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or incorporated by reference in any registration statement of the Operating Partnership filed
under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
the Operating Partnership and will be retained by the Operating Partnership and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### THE FLORIDA BAR, Petitioner, v. Sidney POLLER, Respondent.

No. 36288.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Oct. 4, 1967.

Rehearing Denied Nov. 14, 1967.

Thomas E. Sholts, West Palm Beach, for The Florida Bar, complainant.

Jepeway & Gassen, Miami, for respondent.

*324PER CURIAM.

On April 1, 1967 the Board of Governors of The Florida Bar entered its judgment in part as follows:

> “The Complaint of The Florida Bar charged that the respondent had misappropriated trust funds in the amount of $15,921.02.

> “The referee found the respondent guilty as charged in this Complaint. The referee further found that respondent’s rehabilitation is not a good possibility because of a previous conviction and disciplinary action for misuse of trust funds. The referee recommended that respondent be disbarred.

> “The Board of Governors concurs in and adopts the findings of the referee. The Board is also constrained to observe that this record shows a lack of candor by respondent toward his client whose funds had been misappropriated and toward the referee in the discussion of his former disciplinary case. The Board of Governors, upon consideration, is in agreement with the findings and recommendations of the referee. It is accordingly

> “ORDERED and ADJUDGED that respondent be disbarred and that he pay the costs of these proceedings in the amount of $273.15.”

Respondent has petitioned this Court for review contending that the Board of Governors failed or neglected to consider certain mitigating circumstances and that the penalty of disbarment is too severe.

We have examined the record, the report of the referee, the judgment of the Board and heard oral argument on behalf of the parties. We find the recommended judgment of disbarment is amply justified by the facts.

Accordingly, it is Ordered that the judgment of the Board of Governors, dated April 5, 1967, be approved; that respondent be disbarred from the practice of law and pay the costs of these proceedings in the amount of Two Hundred Seventy-three and 15/100 ($273.15) Dollars.

It is so ordered.

CALDWELL, C. J., and THOMAS, ROBERTS, THORNAL and ERVIN, JJ., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Swift Energy
Operating Partners 1995-A, Ltd.'s balance sheet and statement of operations con-
tained in its Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 1997 and is qualified in
its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                         349,721
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  138,909
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               496,381
<PP&E>                                         3,544,910
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (877,039)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 3,164,252
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          72,213
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     3,084,869
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   3,164,252
<SALES>                                        130,072
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               139,078
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  118,339<F1>
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                1,599
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            1,599
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   1,599
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0
<FN>
<F1>Includes lease operating expenses, production taxes and depreciation,
depletion and amortization expense.  Excludes general and administrative and
interest expense.
</FN>
        


</TABLE>
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 3260

To require the Comptroller General of the United States to conduct a study

regarding the ability of Mexico to carry out its obligations under the

North American Free Trade Agreement and the NAFTA Supplemental

Agreements.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

OCTOBER 12, 1993

Mr. TRAFICANT introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Ways and Means

A BILL

To require the Comptroller General of the United States

to conduct a study regarding the ability of Mexico to

carry out its obligations under the North American Free

Trade Agreement and the NAFTA Supplemental Agreements.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. STUDY.

4 The Comptroller General of the United States shall

5 undertake a study regarding the ability, on both a short6 term and a long-term basis, of the Government of Mexico

7 to carry out its obligations under the North American
2

•HR 3260 IH

1 Free Trade Agreement and the NAFTA Supplemental

2 Agreements. The study shall specifically address the effect

3 of the Government of Mexico’s performance in carrying

4 out such obligations on manufacturing and employment

5 in the United States, as well as the ability of that Govern6 ment to enforce its environmental or other regulatory obli7 gations under such Agreements.

8 SEC. 2. SUBMISSION OF REPORT TO CONGRESS.

9 Within 1 year after the date of the enactment of this

10 Act, the Comptroller General of the United States shall—

11 (1) complete the study required under section

12 1; and

13 (2) submit to the Congress a report containing

14 the results of the study.

Æ
# C_2017349EN.01008701.xml

| 17.10.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 349/87 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.10.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 349/87

---

P8_TA(2015)0329

Subjecting 4,4'-DMAR and MT-45 to control measures *

European Parliament legislative resolution of 6 October 2015 on the draft Council implementing decision on subjecting 4-methyl-5-(4-methylphenyl)- 4,5-dihydrooxazol-2-amine (4,4'-DMAR) and 1-cyclohexyl-4-(1,2-diphenylethyl)piperazine (MT-45) to control measures (10009/2015 — C8-0183/2015 — 2014/0340(NLE))

(Consultation)

(2017/C 349/18)

The European Parliament,

The European Parliament

| — | having regard to the Council draft (10009/2015), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the Council draft (10009/2015),

| — | having regard to Article 39(1) of the Treaty on European Union, as amended by the Treaty of Amsterdam, and Article 9 of Protocol No 36 on Transitional Provisions, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament (C8-0183/2015), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to Article 39(1) of the Treaty on European Union, as amended by the Treaty of Amsterdam, and Article 9 of Protocol No 36 on Transitional Provisions, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament (C8-0183/2015),

| — | having regard to Council Decision 2005/387/JHA of 10 May 2005 on the information exchange, risk-assessment and control of new psychoactive substances (1), and in particular Article 8(3) thereof, |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to Council Decision 2005/387/JHA of 10 May 2005 on the information exchange, risk-assessment and control of new psychoactive substances (1), and in particular Article 8(3) thereof,

1

| — | having regard to Rule 59 of its Rules of Procedure, |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to Rule 59 of its Rules of Procedure,

| — | having regard to the report of the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs (A8-0262/2015), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the report of the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs (A8-0262/2015),

| 1. | Approves the Council draft; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Approves the Council draft;

| 2. | Calls on the Council to notify Parliament if it intends to depart from the text approved by Parliament; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Calls on the Council to notify Parliament if it intends to depart from the text approved by Parliament;

| 3. | Asks the Council to consult Parliament again if it intends to substantially amend the text approved by Parliament; |
| --- | --- |

3.

Asks the Council to consult Parliament again if it intends to substantially amend the text approved by Parliament;

| 4. | Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council and the Commission. |
| --- | --- |

4.

Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council and the Commission.

---

(1)  OJ L 127, 20.5.2005, p. 32.

1

---