alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>
 
                             AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT
                             ----------------------

This agreement effective as of November 1, 1995, by and between First National
Bank of Omaha ("FNBO"), a national banking association with principal offices at
One First National Center, Omaha, Nebraska, and P.M.T. Services, Inc.
("COMPANY") a corporation with principal offices at Two Maryland Farms, Suite
200, Brentwood, TN 37027.

WHEREAS, FNBO and COMPANY are parties to a Processing Agreement dated March 1,
1994 as well as an Amendment to Processing Agreement dated August 7, 1995 (such
Agreement, together with all its schedules and addenda and amendments is herein
called the "AGREEMENT");

WHEREAS, FNBO and COMPANY desire to amend the AGREEMENT to incorporate the terms
and conditions of the USBC Association Plan (an amendment to the FNBO Merchant
Application Guidelines);

NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the AGREEMENT, and their mutual promises
made herein, FNBO and COMPANY agree as follows:

1.    Terms which are typed herein and are not defined herein shall have the 
      same meanings as when described in the AGREEMENT.
 
2.    Attached hereto and incorporated into AGREEMENT by this reference is the
      USBC Association PLAN. Company agrees to be bound by and operate
      consistent with the terms and conditions stated therein.
      
3.    FNBO may amend such USBC Association Plan from time to time as it deems
      reasonable and appropriate.
 
4.    Except as amended hereby, FNBO and COMPANY reaffirm the obligations of 
      each as they are contained in the AGREEMENT.

In witness whereof the parties have set their hands on the date first written
above.



First National Bank of Omaha:           P.M.T. Services, Inc.:


By:    /s/ Nicholas W. Baxter           By:  /s/Richardson M. Roberts
   ------------------------------          -------------------------------

Title:    Vice President                Title:  Chief Executive Officer
      ---------------------------             ----------------------------
Exhibit








Schedule I (Restricted Stock Unit Award with Relative TSR Vesting)
Performance Condition


Performance Period:  [     ]
Relative TSR Condition


TSR Measurement Period:  [   ]


Relative TSR Condition:  The Relative TSR Condition shall be satisfied if the Company’s Total Shareholder Return (as calculated below) during the TSR Measurement Period, as compared to the Total Shareholder Return of the other companies within the Peer Group, is [               ].  For the avoidance of doubt, if the Relative TSR Condition is not satisfied, then all outstanding RSUs shall be forfeited and immediately cancelled.


“Total Shareholder Return” means, with respect to any company, an amount (expressed as a percentage return) equal to:


(i) the sum of (x) the Ending Stock Price minus the Beginning Stock Price, plus (y) the amount of any dividends and distributions paid on a per share basis (calculated as if such dividends had been reinvested in the applicable company’s common stock on the applicable dividend date) cumulatively over the performance period,


divided by


(ii) the Beginning Stock Price.


“Beginning Stock Price” means, with respect to any company, the average closing price per share of common stock for the twenty (20) trading days immediately prior to the first trading day of the TSR Measurement Period.


“Ending Stock Price” means, with respect to any company, the average closing price per share of common stock for the twenty (20) trading days immediately prior to the last day of the TSR Measurement Period.


“Peer Group” means the following companies:


[                                ]




Any company in the Peer Group that ceases to be publicly held during the TSR Measurement Period (i) due to bankruptcy, liquidation or reorganization, shall remain in the Peer Group for purposes of calculation of the Relative TSR Condition (with such company deemed to have a Total Shareholder Return of -100% and ranked at the bottom of the Peer Group) or (ii)  due to a merger, sale, acquisition, business combination or other similar event, shall be excluded from the Peer Group for purposes of calculation of the Relative TSR Condition.
Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed February 28 , 2013

.

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14

- 12

- 01094

- CV

SANDRA SMITH , Appellant

V.

HOUSTON HOUSING AUTH ORITY

- IRVINTON VILLAGE , Appellee

On Appeal from the Co unty Civil C our t at Law No

. 1

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 1022614

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

This is an appeal from a judgment signed December 3 , 2012. The notice of appeal was filed December 7 , 2012. To date, our records show that appellant has not paid the $175.00 appellate filing fee. See Tex. R. App. P. 5 (requiring payment of fees in civil cases unless indigent); Tex. R. App. P. 20.1 (listing requirements for establishing indigence); see also ; Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. ' 51.207.2

On January 17, 2013 , this court ordered appellant to pay the appellate filing
fee on or before February 1, 2013 , or the appeal would be dismissed. Appellant has not paid the appellate filing fee. Accordingly, the ap peal is ordered dismissed.
See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3 (c) (allowing involuntary dismissal of case because appellant has failed to comply with notice from clerk requiring response or other action within specified time).

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justice s Christopher, Jamison, and McCally

.
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NOS. WR-84,278-01 & 84,278-02

EX PARTE MARCUS PURNELL WILHITE, Applicant

ON APPLICATIONS FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

CAUSE NOS. 1141857-A & 1178148-A IN THE 208TH DISTRICT COURT

FROM HARRIS COUNTY

Per curiam. ALCALA, J., filed a concurring opinion in which JOHNSON, J., joined.

YEARY, J., filed a concurring opinion in which KEASLER and HERVEY, JJ., joined.

O R D E R

Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the

clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court these applications for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex

parte Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of two counts

of aggravated robbery and sentenced to fifteen years’ imprisonment on each count. The Fourteenth

Court of Appeals affirmed his convictions. Wilhite v. State, Nos. 14-09-00913-CR & 14-09-00918-

CR (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] July 29, 2010) (not designated for publication).

Applicant contends, among other things, that trial counsel rendered ineffective assistance. 

Without making credibility findings or other specific findings of fact in response to Applicant’s
2

ineffective assistance of trial counsel claim, the trial court concluded that Applicant’s pleas were

voluntary and that Applicant had not demonstrated that counsel was ineffective. The trial court

recommended that we deny relief. We believe that the trial court’s findings of fact and conclusions

of law are not sufficient to resolve Applicant’s claims. 

If the trial court elects to hold a hearing, it shall determine whether Applicant is indigent. 

If Applicant is indigent and wishes to be represented by counsel, the trial court shall appoint an

attorney to represent him at the hearing. TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. art. 26.04. 

The trial court shall make further findings of fact and conclusions of law as to whether

counsel’s conduct was deficient and her deficient conduct prejudiced Applicant. The trial court shall

also make any other findings of fact and conclusions of law that it deems relevant and appropriate

to the disposition of Applicant’s claims for habeas corpus relief.

This application will be held in abeyance until the trial court has resolved the fact issues. The

issues shall be resolved within 90 days of this order. A supplemental transcript containing all

affidavits and interrogatories or the transcription of the court reporter’s notes from any hearing or

deposition, along with the trial court’s supplemental findings of fact and conclusions of law, shall

be forwarded to this Court within 120 days of the date of this order. Any extensions of time shall

be obtained from this Court.

Filed: June 15, 2016

Do not publish
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AS OF JULY 8, 2000; THE CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOR THE 36 WEEKS ENDED JULY 8, 2000; & THE
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS FOR THE 36 WEEKS ENDED JULY 8,
2000 & IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   OTHER
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          OCT-28-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUL-08-2000
<CASH>                                           7,261
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   86,458
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,458
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               114,329
<PP&E>                                          51,443
<DEPRECIATION>                                  30,336
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 177,717
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           56,380
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           159
<OTHER-SE>                                      71,834
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   177,717
<SALES>                                        444,397
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               446,699
<CGS>                                          353,492
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  437,977
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 (213)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 2,972
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,142
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  6,793
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,683
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              4,110
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     4,110
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.26
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.26


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.1

                Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
                             as Adopted Pursuant to
                  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of CFC International,  Inc.
and  subsidiaries  (the "Company") for the quarter ended March 31, 2004 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),
I, Gregory M. Jehlik, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted
pursuant to ss. 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, that, to the best of my
knowledge:

     (1) The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.


Date:  May 9, 2005      /s/             Gregory M. Jehlik
                        ------------------------------------------------------
                           Gregory M. Jehlik
                           President and Chief Executive Officer

This   certification   accompanies  the  Report  pursuant  to  ss.  906  of  the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 and shall not,  except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,  be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of ss.
18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has been
provided by CFC International,  Inc., and will be retained by CFC International,
Inc.  and  furnished to the  Securities  Exchange  Commission  or its staff upon
request.
----

----

| (1)   | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|-----------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2)   | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|-----------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:  September 22, 2010 | By:    | /s/Benjamin L. Denny                  |
|-------------------------------------|--------|---------------------------------------|
|                                |   | Benjamin L. Denny                     |
|                                |   | President and Chief Executive Officer |
|                                |
|                                |
| Date:  September 22, 2010 | By:    | /s/G. Randall Allison       |
|                                |   | G. Randall Allison                    |
|                                |   | Chief Financial Officer               |
#### DIXIE PLYWOOD COMPANY OF MIAMI, INC. and Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co., Petitioners, Cross-Respondents, v. Charles C. TAYLOR and the Industrial Relations Commission, Respondents, Cross-Petitioner.

No. 43403.

Supreme Court of Florida,

April 12, 1973.

Certiorari denied.

ERVIN, Acting C. J., and ADKINS, BOYD, McCAIN and DEKLE, JJ., concur.
IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Churchill Community Development, LP, :

Paradigm Consultants, LLC, Ramesh :

Jain and Vikas Jain :

:

v. : No. 208 C.D. 2019

:

Allegheny County Health Department, :

Appellant :

O R D E R

NOW, February 19, 2020

, having considered A ppellant ’ s application

for reargument and A ppellee s ’ answer in response thereto , the application is denied.

MARY HANNAH LEAVITT,

P resident Judge
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Protect Pharmaceutical Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Ramesha Sesha, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)           The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)            The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





/s/ Ramesha SeshaRamesha SeshaChief Executive OfficerNovember 21, 2011





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.  The foregoing certifications are accompanying the Company's Form 10-Q solely pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Form 10-Q or as a separate disclosure document.
MICHAELD.BISHOP8THDISTRICT,MICHIGANCOMMITTEEONTHEJUDICIARYCOMMITTEEONEDUCATIONANDTHEWORKFORCE<trnngrtssnftlttlllnittllj!)ouseofll\epresentatfbesllllla.aftingtnn.ll(!t2U515-22UBOctober28,2015TheHonorableAnthonyFoxxSecretaryofTransportationOfficeoftheSecretaryU.S.DepartmentofTransportation1200NewJerseyAvenue,SEWashington,DC20590DearSecretaryFoxx:428CANNONHOUSEOFFICEBUILDINGWASHINGTON,DC20515(202)711EASTGRANDRIVER,SUITEABRIGHTON,MJ48116(810)227-8600WWW.MIKEBISHOP.HOUSE.GOVWewritetodayseekingatimelyresolutioningrantinganapplicationfiledforaslotexemptiontoallowcontinuednonstopservicefromLansing,Michigan(LAN)toWashingtonD.C.(DCA).WithSunCountrynolongerservicingthisroute,aquickdecisioniscrucialtoensurealapseinserviceisasshortaspossible.ThereareanumberofwaysinwhichthisroutebenefitsMichiganders,chiefamongthemisincreasedeconomicactivityandconnectivity.ArecentassessmentoftheeconomicimpactsbyTrillionAviation,Inc.foundthatcontinuedservicewouldhavepositiveeconomicbenefitofupto$16millionannuallyontheairportandsurroundingregion.Inaddition,LansingistheseatoftheMichigan governmentandEastLansingishometooneofthenation'sleadingresearchuniversities.Thistransportationlineisessentialinconnectingthesecentersofactivitytothenation'scapitalinaquickandefficientmanner.Thankyouagainforyourconsideration.Pleasedonothesitatetocontactusifyouhaveanyquestionsregardingthisrequest.MemberofCongressMoolenaaremberofCongressSincerely,TimalbergMemberofCongress
#### Frank Wilson WHITEHEAD, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 74-3.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

March 13, 1974.

Appeal dismissed.
#### STATE of Louisiana v. John Ernest BIRABENT.

No. 54262.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Feb. 1, 1974.

In re: John Ernest Birabent applying for writs of certiorari, prohibition, mandamus and for stay order.

Writ denied. We pretermit whether the trial court committed error, cf. State v. Lawrence, 221 La. 861, 60 So.2d 464 (1952), because relator has an adequate remedy in the trial court if error was committed.

BARHAM, J.,

concurs. The issues presented here may be more pointedly made by motions in the trial court if prosecution continues. Adequate remedy is available in this Court if the trial court errs in future rulings.

DIXON, J.,

dissents. A grand jury indictment cannot be “amended” by the court from manslaughter to murder. Defendant has already been placed in jeopardy for this killing.
# C_2014051EN.01001001.xml

| 22.2.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 51/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.2.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 51/10

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

21 February 2014

(2014/C 51/04)

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,3707 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 140,50 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4625 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,82183 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 8,9953 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,2195 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,3670 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 27,368 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 311,89 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,1661 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,5222 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 3,0097 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,5283 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,5304 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 10,6313 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,6558 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,7376 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 469,53 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 15,1355 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 8,3495 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,6685 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 16 097,50 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,5158 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 61,092 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 49,0415 |
| THB | Thai baht | 44,603 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 3,2577 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 18,2348 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 85,1580 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,3707

JPY

Japanese yen

140,50

DKK

Danish krone

7,4625

GBP

Pound sterling

0,82183

SEK

Swedish krona

8,9953

CHF

Swiss franc

1,2195

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,3670

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

27,368

HUF

Hungarian forint

311,89

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

PLN

Polish zloty

4,1661

RON

Romanian leu

4,5222

TRY

Turkish lira

3,0097

AUD

Australian dollar

1,5283

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,5304

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

10,6313

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,6558

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,7376

KRW

South Korean won

1 469,53

ZAR

South African rand

15,1355

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

8,3495

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,6685

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

16 097,50

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,5158

PHP

Philippine peso

61,092

RUB

Russian rouble

49,0415

THB

Thai baht

44,603

BRL

Brazilian real

3,2577

MXN

Mexican peso

18,2348

INR

Indian rupee

85,1580

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
SCWC

- 18

- 0000655

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI  I

STATE OF HAWAI ‘ I , Respondent/Plaintiff

- Appellee ,

vs.

JIMMY MOON LEE , Petitioner/Defendant

- Appellant.

CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS

(CAAP

- 18

- 0000655; 1DCW

- 16

- 0004128 )

ORDER REJECT ING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI (By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, and Wilson, JJ.,

and Circuit Judge Crabtree, due to vacancy )

P etitioner ’s application for writ of certiorari filed

on July 29 , 2020, is hereb y rejected

.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai  i, September 3, 2020

.
/s/ Mark E. Recktenwald
/s/ Paula A. Nakayama

/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna

/s/ Michael D. Wilson
/s/ Jeffrey P. Crabtree Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCWC-18-0000655 03-SEP-2020 02:16 PM
V

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 3281

To authorize the Secretary of Transportation to issue a certificate of documentation with appropriate endorsement for employment in the coastwise

trade of the United States for the vessel TOO MUCH FUN.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

OCTOBER 13, 1993

Ms. BYRNE introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee

on Merchant Marine and Fisheries

A BILL

To authorize the Secretary of Transportation to issue a

certificate of documentation with appropriate endorsement for employment in the coastwise trade of the

United States for the vessel TOO MUCH FUN.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That notwithstanding section 27 of the Merchant Marine

4 Act, 1920 (46 App. U.S.C. 883), the Act of June 19, 1886

5 (46 App. U.S.C. 289), and section 12106 of title 46,

6 United States Code, the Secretary of Transportation may

7 issue a certificate of documentation with appropriate en8 dorsement for employment in the coastwise trade of the
2

•HR 3281 IH

1 United States for the vessel TOO MUCH FUN (United

2 States official number 936565).

Æ