alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
House Calendar No. 120

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 3356

[Report No. 103–348]

A BILL

To designate the United States courthouse under

Jr., United States Courthouse’’.Charles, Louisiana, as the ‘‘Edwin Ford Hunter,construction at 611 Broad Street, in Lake

NOVEMBER 10, 1993

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be

printed
IB

House Calendar No. 120

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 3356

[Report No. 103–348]

To designate the United States courthouse under construction at 611 Broad

Street, in Lake Charles, Louisiana, as the ‘‘Edwin Ford Hunter, Jr.,

United States Courthouse’’.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

OCTOBER 26, 1993

Mr. HAYES introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee

on Public Works and Transportation

NOVEMBER 10, 1993

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed

A BILL

To designate the United States courthouse under construction at 611 Broad Street, in Lake Charles, Louisiana,

as the ‘‘Edwin Ford Hunter, Jr., United States Courthouse’’.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

HR 3356 RH

1 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

2 The United States courthouse under construction at

3 611 Broad Street, in Lake Charles, Louisiana, shall be

4 known and designated as the ‘‘Edwin Ford Hunter, Jr.,

5 United States Courthouse’’.

6 SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

7 Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document,

8 paper, or other record of the United States to the court9 house referred to in section 1 shall be deemed to be a ref10 erence to the ‘‘Edwin Ford Hunter, Jr., United States

11 Courthouse’’.
#### Johnny Bolton FORD, Petitioner, Cross-Respondent, v. Frank J. QUARZENSKI and the Industrial Relations Commission, Respondents, Cross-Petitioner.

No. 42559.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Oct. 18, 1972.

Certiorari denied.

ROBERTS, C. J., and ADKINS, BOYD, McCAIN and DEKLE, JJ., concur.
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 3314

To provide for a review of all Federal programs that assess or mitigate

the risks to women’s health from environmental exposures, and for a

study of the research needs of the Federal Government relating to

such risks.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

OCTOBER 19, 1993

Ms. SLAUGHTER (for herself, Mrs. UNSOELD, and Ms. FURSE) introduced the

following bill; which was referred jointly to the Committees on Energy

and Commerce and Science, Space, and Technology

A BILL

To provide for a review of all Federal programs that assess

or mitigate the risks to women’s health from environmental exposures, and for a study of the research needs

of the Federal Government relating to such risks.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Federal Risk Assess5 ment in Women’s Health Act of 1993’’.
2

•HR 3314 IH

1 SEC. 2. INTERAGENCY REVIEW.

2 The Office of Science and Technology Policy, through

3 the Federal Coordinating Council for Science, Engineer4 ing, and Technology, and in consultation with the Office

5 of Research on Women’s Health of the National Institutes

6 of Health, shall conduct a review of all Federal programs

7 that assess or mitigate the risks to women’s health from

8 environmental exposures, including programs setting

9 standards for exposure to various pollutants, toxic sub10 stances, pesticide use, and pesticide residues. The results

11 of such review, including recommendations for ensuring

12 that women’s health needs are addressed by Federal pro13 grams and policies, shall be transmitted to the Congress

14 within 6 months after the date of enactment of this Act.

15 SEC. 3. STUDY OF RESEARCH NEEDS.

16 The National Institute of Environmental Health

17 Sciences shall enter into a contract with the National Re18 search Council of the National Academy of Sciences for

19 the carrying out by such Council, in consultation with the

20 Office of Research on Women’s Health of the National

21 Institutes of Health, for a study to determine the status

22 of the science base and needs of the Federal Government

23 for research relating to the risks to women’s health from

24 environmental exposures, for the purpose of assessing and

25 mitigating such risks. The results of such study shall be
3

•HR 3314 IH

1 transmitted to the Congress within one year after the date

2 of enactment of this Act.

Æ
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000949298
<NAME> CENTRAL PARKING CORPORATION
<RESTATED>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1998             SEP-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1998             OCT-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998             JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                          38,330                  40,938
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   30,617                  52,239
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0                       0
<INVENTORY>                                          0                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                89,182                 128,217
<PP&E>                                         382,336                 414,166
<DEPRECIATION>                                  11,158                  16,670
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 926,505               1,051,917
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          111,973                 153,665
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          110,000                 110,000
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                           366                     367
<OTHER-SE>                                     332,599                 344,292
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   926,505               1,051,917
<SALES>                                              0                       0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               429,651                 554,606
<CGS>                                          326,882                 422,858
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  377,888                 520,096
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0                       0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              24,927                  25,272
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 32,567                  12,040
<INCOME-TAX>                                    13,267                   9,804
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             19,300                   2,236
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                  (1,002)
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                    19,300                   1,234
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.57                    0.03
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.56                    0.03


</TABLE>
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

THE STATE OF TEXAS, §

§ No. 08

- 14

- 00272

- CR

Appellant,

§ Appeal from the

v.

§ County Court at Law No. 7

VICTOR MANUEL GALLEGOS, of El Paso County, Texas

Appellee. §

§ (TC# 20120C00942)

J U D G M E N T

The Court has considered this cause on the record and concludes there was error in the

judgment. We therefore reverse the order granting the motion for a directed verdict and the

judgment of acquittal, reinstate the jury’s verdict of guilty, and remand the cause to the trial court

for a punishment hearing, in accordance with the opinion of the Court. This decision shall be

certified below for observance.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 9TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2015.

STEVEN L. HUGHES, Justice

Before McClure, C.J., Rodriguez, and Hughes, JJ.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-7384

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

BARRY ALAN JOHNSON,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

South Carolina, at Florence. Terry L. Wooten, Chief District 

Judge. (4:11-cr-02156-TLW-1)

Submitted: January 14, 2016 Decided: January 20, 2016

Before AGEE, WYNN, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Barry Alan Johnson, Appellant Pro Se. William E. Day, II, 

Assistant United States Attorney, Florence, South Carolina, for 

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Barry Alan Johnson appeals from the district court’s orders 

granting his motion for modification of sentence, 18 U.S.C. 

§ 3582(c)(2) (2012), and denying his motion for reconsideration. 

We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. 

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district 

court. United States v. Johnson, No. 4:11-cr-02156-TLW-1 

(D.S.C. July 31, 2015; Aug. 19, 2015). We dispense with oral 

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately 

presented in the materials before this court and argument would 

not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 161 (Monday, August 20, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Page 42198]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-17920]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice: 10512]


Certification Related to the Central Government of Haiti Under 
the Department of State, Foreign Operations, and Related Programs 
Appropriations Act, 2018

    Pursuant to section 7045(c) (1) of the Department of State, Foreign 
Operations, and Related Programs Appropriations Act, 2018 (Div. K, Pub. 
L. 115-141), I hereby certify that the central Government of Haiti is 
taking effective steps, which are in addition to steps taken since the 
certification and report submitted on August 3, 2017, if applicable, 
to:
    <bullet> Strengthen the rule of law in Haiti, including by 
selecting judges in a transparent manner based on merit; reducing pre-
trial detention; respecting the independence of the judiciary; and 
improving governance by implementing reforms to increase transparency 
and accountability, including through the penal and criminal codes;
    <bullet> Combat corruption, including by implementing the anti-
corruption law enacted in 2014 and prosecuting corrupt officials;
    <bullet> Increase government revenues, including by implementing 
tax reforms, and increase expenditures on public services; and
    <bullet> Resolve commercial disputes between United States entities 
and the Government of Haiti.

    Dated: August 13, 2018.
Michael Pompeo,
Secretary of State.
[FR Doc. 2018-17920 Filed 8-17-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4710-29-P
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23-B

                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS
 
We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statement on Form S-8 (No. 333-09679) and the Registration Statements on Form
S-3 (No. 33-63875, No. 333-10517 and No. 333-17517) of Veritas DGC Inc., of our
report dated September 20, 1996 appearing on page 17 of Veritas DGC Inc.'s
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended July 31, 1998.
 
PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS
Chartered Accountants
 
October 2, 1998
EXHIBIT
32.1 CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT
Section 1350 Certification In connection with the
annual report of Hydron Technologies, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the
year ended September 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (the Report), I, Richard Banakus, Interim President and Principal
Financial and Accounting Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
SS. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that: 1. The Report fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and 2. The information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and result of operations of the Company. HYDRON
 TECHNOLOGIES, INC./s/: Richard BanakusRichard BanakusInterim President,
 Principal Financial and Accounting OfficerJanuary 13, 2010
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3238 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3238

 To clarify the tax treatment of certain environmental clean-up costs.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 7, 1993

Mr. Brewster (for himself, Mr. Jefferson, and Mr. Camp) introduced the 
 following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To clarify the tax treatment of certain environmental clean-up costs.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. TAX TREATMENT OF CERTAIN ENVIRONMENTAL CLEAN-UP COSTS NOT TO 
              CHANGE.

    (a) In General.--In the administration of subchapter B of chapter 1 
of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, the Secretary of the Treasury or 
his delegate shall continue to treat amounts paid or incurred in 
connection with the environmental remediation activities of a trade or 
business as deductible under the provisions of section 162 of such Code 
(relating to trade or business expenses) rather than under the 
provisions of section 263 of such Code (relating to capital 
expenditures) or section 263A of such Code (relating to capitalization 
and inclusion in inventory costs of certain expenses), notwithstanding 
the position taken in Technical Advice Memorandum 9315004.
    (b) Definition of Environmental Remediation Activity.--For purposes 
of this section, the term ``environmental remediation activity'' 
means--
            (1) the conduct of an environmental assessment of any 
        petroleum storage or marketing site, and
            (2) the clean-up of contamination resulting from petroleum 
        leakage (including the removal and cleaning of soil and 
        measures to reduce contamination of underlying water).

SEC. 2. EFFECTIVE DATE.

    The provisions of this Act shall apply with respect to taxable 
years beginning after the date of enactment of this Act and with 
respect to taxable years for which the period for making claim for 
credit or refund of an overpayment of taxes under chapter 1 of the 
Internal Revenue Code of 1986 has not expired as of such date.

                                 <all>
```
# C_2014017EN.01001201.xml

| 21.1.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 17/12 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.1.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 17/12

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

20 January 2014

2014/C 17/09

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,3566 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 141,05 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4623 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,82620 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 8,7830 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,2337 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,3775 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 27,524 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 301,71 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,1578 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,5360 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 3,0379 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,5388 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4838 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 10,5225 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,6405 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,7310 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 443,23 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 14,6895 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 8,2111 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,6320 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 16 406,48 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,5004 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 61,214 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 45,7878 |
| THB | Thai baht | 44,518 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 3,1637 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 17,9546 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 83,5380 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,3566

JPY

Japanese yen

141,05

DKK

Danish krone

7,4623

GBP

Pound sterling

0,82620

SEK

Swedish krona

8,7830

CHF

Swiss franc

1,2337

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,3775

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

27,524

HUF

Hungarian forint

301,71

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

PLN

Polish zloty

4,1578

RON

Romanian leu

4,5360

TRY

Turkish lira

3,0379

AUD

Australian dollar

1,5388

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4838

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

10,5225

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,6405

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,7310

KRW

South Korean won

1 443,23

ZAR

South African rand

14,6895

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

8,2111

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,6320

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

16 406,48

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,5004

PHP

Philippine peso

61,214

RUB

Russian rouble

45,7878

THB

Thai baht

44,518

BRL

Brazilian real

3,1637

MXN

Mexican peso

17,9546

INR

Indian rupee

83,5380

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
# C_2012296EN.01000501.xml

| 2.10.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 296/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.10.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 296/5

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

1 October 2012

2012/C 296/04

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,2877 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 100,42 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4554 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,79830 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 8,4731 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,2095 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 7,3780 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 25,080 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 285,13 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,6962 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,1057 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,5223 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,3117 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,2431 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,2667 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 9,9850 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,5533 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,5827 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 435,49 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 10,7321 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 8,0926 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,4255 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 12 334,98 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 3,9433 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 53,731 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 40,2230 |
| THB | Thai baht | 39,648 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 2,6098 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 16,5824 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 67,4870 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,2877

JPY

Japanese yen

100,42

DKK

Danish krone

7,4554

GBP

Pound sterling

0,79830

SEK

Swedish krona

8,4731

CHF

Swiss franc

1,2095

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

7,3780

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

25,080

HUF

Hungarian forint

285,13

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,6962

PLN

Polish zloty

4,1057

RON

Romanian leu

4,5223

TRY

Turkish lira

2,3117

AUD

Australian dollar

1,2431

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,2667

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

9,9850

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,5533

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,5827

KRW

South Korean won

1 435,49

ZAR

South African rand

10,7321

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

8,0926

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,4255

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

12 334,98

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

3,9433

PHP

Philippine peso

53,731

RUB

Russian rouble

40,2230

THB

Thai baht

39,648

BRL

Brazilian real

2,6098

MXN

Mexican peso

16,5824

INR

Indian rupee

67,4870

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 03-4939

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
MARTEZ COLEMAN, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. Joseph F. Anderson, Jr., Chief District Judge. (CR-01-506) Submitted: August 25, 2004 Decided: September 28, 2004 Before WILLIAMS, MOTZ, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. William T. Toal, JOHNSON, TOAL & BATTISTE, P.A., Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellant. J. Strom Thurmond, Jr., United States Attorney, Mark C. Moore, Assistant United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: Martez Coleman was convicted after a jury trial of membership in a conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute and to distribute cocaine base and powder, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 846 (2000), possession with intent to distribute cocaine base, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841 (2000), killing, or counseling, commanding, inducing, or procuring, and aiding and abetting in a killing while involved in a 21 U.S.C. § 841 offense, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2 (2000), 21 U.S.C. § 848(e)(1)(A) (2000), and using a firearm in a drug crime or crime of violence, murder, and aiding and abetting in murder, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2 (2000), 18 U.S.C. § 924(j) (2000). Coleman was sentenced to life sentences for these offenses. Coleman has timely appealed. On appeal, Coleman asserts that the district court erred by (1) allowing the Government to bolster the testimony of two Government witnesses; (2) permitting the Government to introduce a witness’ testimony that effectively punished Coleman for exercising his right to remain silent; and (3) denying his Fed. R. Crim. P. 33 motion for a new trial. We review a district court’s evidentiary rulings for abuse of discretion. General Elec. Co. v. Joiner , 522 U.S. 136, 141-42 (1997). A district court’s denial of a Fed. R. Crim. P. 33 motion for a new trial is also reviewed for abuse of discretion. United States v. Arrington , 757 F.2d 1484, 1486 (4th Cir. 1985).- 3 - Following careful review of the record, we reject Coleman’s claims as meritless. The testimony of the two witnesses in question was not impermissibly bolstered, United States v. Lewis , 10 F.3d 1086, 1089 (4th Cir. 1993); Coleman’s right to remain silent was not infringed by the testimony of another witness, United States v. Whitehead , 618 F.2d 523, 527 (4th Cir. 1980); and Coleman failed to satisfy the requirements necessary to receive a new trial, UnitedStates v. Chavis , 880 F.2d 788, 793 (4th Cir. 1989). Accordingly, we affirm Coleman’s conviction and sentence. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

               CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement
(Form S-8) pertaining to the 1996 Incentive Stock Plan and the 1998 Employee
Stock Purchase Plan of Abgenix, Inc. of our report dated January 28, 2000 with
respect to the financial statements of Abgenix, Inc. included in the Company's
Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.


                                                           /s/ Ernst & Young LLP


Palo Alto California
September 6, 2000