alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2014060EN.01000101.xml

| 1.3.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 60/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.3.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 60/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.7124 — CPPIB/INTU/Parque Principado)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2014/C 60/01

On 25 February 2014, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32014M7124. EUR-Lex is the online access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32014M7124. EUR-Lex is the online access to the European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3286 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3286

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

            November 16 (legislative day, November 2), 1993

                                Received

            November 17 (legislative day, November 2), 1993

    Read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural 
                               Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
To authorize the Secretary of the Interior to lease certain properties 
             at the Presidio of San Francisco, California.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. LETTERMAN-LAIR COMPLEX AT PRESIDIO.

    The Secretary of the Interior is authorized to negotiate and enter 
into leases, at fair market rental and without regard to section 321 of 
chapter 314 of the Act of June 30, 1932 (40 U.S.C. 303b), for all or 
part of the Letterman-LAIR complex at the Presidio of San Francisco to 
be used for scientific, research or educational purposes. For 5 years 
from the date of enactment of this section, the proceeds from any such 
lease shall be retained by the Secretary and used for the preservation, 
restoration, operation and maintenance, improvement, repair and related 
expenses incurred with respect to Presidio properties. For purposes of 
any such lease, the Secretary may adjust the rental by taking into 
account any amounts to be expended by the lessee for preservation, 
maintenance, restoration, improvement, repair and related expenses with 
respect to the leased properties.

            Passed the House of Representatives November 15, 1993.

            Attest:

                                           DONNALD K. ANDERSON,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
ABRAHAM FREDERICK
BROWN

,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

,

Appellee

. IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO
FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND
DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D 13

- 4623

_____________________________/

Opinion filed February 25, 2015.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County

. Mallory D. Cooper, Judge

.

Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender, and Courtenay H. Miller, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee , for Appellan t.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Kristen Lynn Bonjour, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee , for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

WOLF

, BENTON

, and MAKAR

, J J

. , CONCUR.
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATION JOINT CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

I, Emanuel Arbib, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Trident Rowan Group, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual
report; and

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

July 18, 2003


/s/ Emanuel Arbib

Joint Chief Executive Officer


                                       85
# C_2013195EN.01000101.xml

| 6.7.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 195/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.7.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 195/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.6739 — Allianz/VW Financial Services/JV)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2013/C 195/01

On 7 March 2013, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in German and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32013M6739. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32013M6739. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.

---
Exhibit 4.1 


 

  


 

  


 Alaia Capital, LLC 


 10 Corbin Drive 


 Darien, Connecticut 06820 


 


 November 18, 2016 


 


 ALAIA Market Linked Trust, Series 1-1 


 ALAIA SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Defined Outcome Solution 


 c/o The Bank of New York Mellon, as Trustee 


 2 Hanson Place, 12th Floor 


 Brooklyn, New York 11217 


 

  



	
Re:

	
ALAIA SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Defined Outcome Solution (the “Fund”)







 


 


 Ladies and Gentlemen: 


 


 We have examined the Registration Statement (File No. 333-206756) for the above captioned Fund.  We hereby consent to the use in the Registration Statement of the references to Alaia Capital, LLC as evaluator. 


 


 You are hereby authorized to file a copy of this letter with the Securities and Exchange Commission. 


 


 


 


	   	  Very truly yours, 	   
	   	   	   
	   	  Alaia Capital, LLC 	   
	   	   	   
	   	
 By: 

	
 /s/ Oscar Loynaz 

	   
	   	   	
 Oscar Loyanz 

	   
	   	   	
 Managing Director
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 3453

To amend the Drug-Free Schools and Communities Act of 1986 to provide

for the continuation of the programs of such Act.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

NOVEMBER 4, 1993

Mr. OWENS introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee

on Education and Labor

A BILL

To amend the Drug-Free Schools and Communities Act of

1986 to provide for the continuation of the programs

of such Act.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Drug-Free Schools and

5 Communities Act Amendments of 1993’’.
2

•HR 3453 IH

1 SEC. 2. AUTHORIZATIONS OF APPROPRIATIONS FOR PRO2 GRAMS OF DRUG-FREE SCHOOLS AND COM3 MUNITIES ACT OF 1986.

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 5111(a)(1) of the Drug5 Free Schools and Communities Act of 1986 (42 U.S.C.

6 3181(a)(1)) is amended—

7 (1) by striking ‘‘and’’ after ‘‘1989,’’; and

8 (2) by inserting before the period the following:

9 ‘‘, and such sums as may be necessary for each of

10 the fiscal years 1994 through 1998’’.

11 (b) TRAINING OF TEACHERS, COUNSELORS, AND

12 SCHOOL PERSONNEL; EMERGENCY GRANTS.—Section

13 5111(a)(2)(A) of the Drug-Free Schools and Communities

14 Act of 1986 (42 U.S.C. 3181(a)(2)(A)) is amended—

15 (1) by striking ‘‘and’’ after ‘‘1989,’’; and

16 (2) by inserting before the period the following:

17 ‘‘, and such sums as may be necessary for each of

18 the fiscal years 1994 through 1998’’.

19 (c) EMERGENCY GRANTS.—Section 5111(a)(3) of the

20 Drug-Free Schools and Communities Act of 1986 (42

21 U.S.C. 3181(a)(3)) is amended by inserting before the pe22 riod the following: ‘‘, and such sums as may be necessary

23 for each of the fiscal years 1994 through 1998’’.

Æ
#### RIVERLAND ENCO SERVICE CENTER and Mutual Casualty Company, Appellants, v. Richard W. GADDY and Ralph G. McGlauthen, Appellees.

No. 72-172.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

May 24, 1972.

Appeal from Court of Record, Broward County; John G. Ferris, Judge.

Appeal dismissed.
In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

No. 02-23-00031-CR

DAVID RIOS, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS

§

§

§

§

§

On Appeal from the 371st District 

Court

of Tarrant County (1672755D)

November 30, 2023

Memorandum Opinion by Chief Justice 

Sudderth

(nfp)

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that there 

was error in the trial court’s judgment. The judgment is modified to reflect that Rios 

pleaded “not true.” Further, although the trial court’s judgment states that the trial 

court found allegations 1–6 and 7(a) true, the record reflects that the trial court found 

allegations 1–6, 7(b), and 7(c)—but not 7(a)—true, we likewise correct this portion of 

the judgment. It is ordered that the judgment of the trial court is affirmed as 

modified.
SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS 

By /s/ Bonnie Sudderth

 Chief Justice Bonnie Sudderth
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED
FROM THE REGISTRANT'S CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AND CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOR THE TWELVE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 1999
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                           5,548
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   11,154
<ALLOWANCES>                                       187
<INVENTORY>                                     11,890
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                32,157
<PP&E>                                          26,907
<DEPRECIATION>                                  16,659
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  48,167
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           11,850
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            31
<OTHER-SE>                                      31,364
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    48,167
<SALES>                                         59,084
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                59,362
<CGS>                                           40,324
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   40,324
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                15,879
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 326
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,833
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,131
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,702
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,702
<EPS-BASIC>                                     0.63
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.63


</TABLE>
#### Efern MARTINEZ, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 71-684.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

June 14, 1972.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
U.S. flag
              An official website of the United States government Skip to main content   end of header Census.gov Newsroom Releases African American Business Ownership En Español
 Newsroom Archive
 Skip left menu navigation
 About the Newsroom
 				Facts for Features
 				**News Releases**
 				Press Kits
 				Tip Sheets
 Release Information CB11-R.19SP **Contact:**  Briana Kaya Public Information Office
301-763-3030/3762 (fax)
 PARA PUBLICACIÓN INMEDIATA:  MARTES, 8 DE FEBRERO DE 2011 La Oficina del Censo Revela un Aumento de 70 Por Ciento en el Número de Empresas Cuyos Propietarios son de Raza Negra en el Área Metropolitana de Miami El número de empresas cuyos propietarios son de raza negra en el área estadística metropolitana de Miami-Fort Lauderdale-Pompano Beach, Fla., aumentó a 99,512 en el 2007 de 58,559 en el 2002, lo cual representa un aumento de 69.9 por ciento, anunció hoy la Oficina del Censo de los Estados Unidos. Durante el mismo período, los ingresos generados por dichas empresas aumentaron 61.8 por ciento con  $4.9 mil millones. A nivel nacional, el número de empresas cuyos propietarios son de raza negra aumentó a 1.9 millones de empresas, un aumento de 60.5 por ciento, y las ventas de dichas empresas aumentaron a $137.5 mil millones, un aumento de 55.1 por ciento. Las industrias en el área metropolitana con el mayor número de empresas cuyos propietarios son de raza negra incluyen cuidado de salud y asistencia social (21,267 empresas); servicios de reparación, mantenimiento, personales y de lavandería (20,808 empresas); y servicios de administración y apoyo y manejo de desperdicios y remediación (12,050 empresas). Dichos datos provienen de la Encuesta de Empresarios de 2007, la cual forma parte del Censo Económico de 2007. La encuesta provee información detallada cada cinco años sobre empresas cuyos propietarios son de raza negra, incluyendo el número de firmas, ventas e ingresos, número de empleados remunerados y nómina anual para estados, condados, ciudades y áreas metropolitanas.  https://www.census.gov/econ/sbo/methodology.html
  CONNECT WITH US

Information Quality
                    Data Linkage Infrastructure
                    Data Protection and Privacy Policy
                    Accessibility      
                    FOIA
                    Inspector General
                    No FEAR Act
                    U.S. Department of Commerce
                    USA.gov
                   Measuring America's People, Places, and Economy
DEAR MR Thomas Gardner: I'm a long

- time advocate for cleaner water, and have participated fully in

past Triennial Review sessions with our AR Dept. of Env'l Quality...

I've reviewed your possible changes, A (Antigegradation) through E: (Triennial Revi ews) , and

wholeheartedly suggerst they will be improvements and strengthen the achievements of the EPA.

-- I DO APPROVE THEM! Respectfully, W A Saunders (501)664

- 2539
#### RESTAURANT ASSOCIATES INDUSTRIES OF FLORIDA, INC., a Florida corporation, Appellant, v. DADE COUNTY, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, et al., Appellee.

No. 73-1239.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Dec. 5, 1973.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed.
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 163 (Wednesday, August 22, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Page 42490]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-18118]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

RIN 0648-XG432


North Pacific Fishery Management Council; Public Meeting

AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and 
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.

ACTION: Notice of telephonic meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The North Pacific Fishery Management Council (Council) 
Observer Advisory Committee Subgroup will meet September 5, 2018.

DATES: The meeting will be held on Wednesday, September 5, 2018, from 1 
[hairsp]p.m. to 2:30 p.m.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held telephonically. Teleconference 
line: (907) 271-2896.
    Council address: North Pacific Fishery Management Council, 605 W 
4th Ave., Suite 306, Anchorage, AK 99501-2252; telephone: (907) 271-
2809.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Elizabeth Figus, Council staff; 
telephone: (907) 271-2809.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Agenda

    The agenda will include: A discussion of the Observer Program Fee 
Analysis developments since June 2018, including an outline, 
alternatives, monitoring objectives, and discussion of analysis 
methods.

Public Comment

    Public comment letters will be accepted and should be submitted 
either electronically to Elizabeth Figus, Council staff: 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#f6b39a9f8c979493829ed8909f918385b698999797d8919980"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="7431181d0e151611001c5a121d130107341a1b15155a131b02">[email protected]</span></a> or through the mail: North Pacific Fishery 
Management Council, 605 W 4th Ave., Suite 306, Anchorage, AK 99501-
2252. In-person oral public testimony will be accepted at the 
discretion of the chair.

Special Accommodations

    The meeting is physically accessible to people with disabilities. 
Requests for sign language interpretation or other auxiliary aids 
should be directed to Shannon Gleason at (907) 271-2809 at least 7 
working days prior to the meeting date.

    Dated: August 17, 2018.
Tracey L. Thompson,
Acting Deputy Director, Office of Sustainable Fisheries, National 
Marine Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 2018-18118 Filed 8-21-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 3510-22-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### CITY OF MIAMI, Appellant, v. Wallace D. CULBERTSON et al., Appellees.

No. 73-318.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Aug. 28, 1973.

Alan H. Rothstein, City Atty., and R. Harris Turner, Asst. City Atty., for appellant.

John R. Farrell, Miami, Sibley, Giblin, Levenson & Ward, Miami Beach, for ap-pellees.

Before PEARSON, HENDRY and HAVERFIELD, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from an order allowing attorney’s fees in an eminent domain proceeding. The point presented challenges the amount of the fee.

The record reveals that the fee was less an amount than the amount testified to by any of the three expert witnesses. The City declined to present any evidence and stated upon inquiry by the trial judge, “I don’t know what a reasonable fee is . 1 want to throw that in your lap.” Upon further inquiry by the trial judge, the City stated that in such matters it used a rule of thumb of ten percent of the award. The amount allowed in this unusual and difficult case is less than twelve percent of the award. We conclude that the City has failed to show an abuse of judicial discretion. See Florida East Coast Railway Co. v. Martin County, Fla.1965, 171 So.2d 873; Dean v. State Road Department, Fla.App.1966, 184 So.2d 517.

Affirmed.
# C_2014046EN.01000501.xml

| 18.2.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 46/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.2.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 46/5

---

Notice for the attention of the persons subject to the restrictive measures provided for in Council Decision 2011/172/CFSP and in Council Regulation (EU) No 270/2011 concerning restrictive measures directed against certain persons, entities and bodies in view of the situation in Egypt

(2014/C 46/06)

COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

The following information is brought to the attention of the persons who appear in the Annex to Council Decision 2011/172/CFSP (1) and in Annex I to Council Regulation (EU) No 270/2011 (2) concerning restrictive measures directed against certain persons, entities and bodies in view of the situation in Egypt. The grounds for listing of those persons appear in the relevant entries in those Annexes.

1

2

The persons concerned may submit a request to the Council, together with supporting documentation, that the decision to include them on the abovementioned lists should be reconsidered, before 4 March 2014, to the following address:

| Council of the European Union |
| --- |
| General Secretariat |
| DG C 1C |
| Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175 |
| 1048 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |

Council of the European Union

General Secretariat

DG C 1C

Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175

1048 Bruxelles/Brussel

BELGIQUE/BELGIË

E-mail: sanctions@consilium.europa.eu

Any observations received will be taken into account for the purpose of the Council's periodic review, in accordance with Article 12 of Regulation (EU) No 270/2011, of the list of designated persons.

---

(1)  OJ L 76, 22.3.2011, p. 63.

1

(2)  OJ L 76, 22.3.2011, p. 4.

2

---