alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 32**

**Section 1350 CertificationsPursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002(Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title18, United States Code)**

Pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350,Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), each of the undersigned officersof Credit Suisse (USA), Inc. (the “Company”) does hereby certify, to suchofficer’s knowledge, that:

1.                the Annual Reporton Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005 of theCompany (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.                theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| March 20, 2006 | /s/ BRADY W. DOUGAN |
|---------------------|---------------------|
|                | Name:               | Brady  W. Dougan |
|                | Title:              | *President  and Chief Executive Officer* |
| March 20, 2006 | /s/ DAVID C. FISHER |
|                | Name:               | David  C. Fisher |
|                | Title:              | *Chief  Financial and Accounting Officer* |

 

----
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON STATE OF WASHINGTON, Respondent,

v. COUNT MARKANTHONY CORHAN, AKA MARK ANTHONY CORHAN, Appellant. No. 70499-1-1 DIVISION ONE UNPUBLISHED OPINION

FILED: June 30, 2014 PerCuriam. Count Corhan appeals from thejudgment and sentence 

### entered after he pleaded guilty to three counts ofharassment
- domestic violence. The State concedes, and we agree, thatthe trial courterroneously 

### imposed a 72-month term ofprobation. We reverse the sentence and remand for further proceedings. See RCW 9.95.210(1 )(a); State v. Parent, 164Wn. App. 210, 212, 267 P.3d 358 (2011). In his statement ofadditional grounds for review, Corhan alleges that he 

### did not understand the terms of his plea bargain, that he was unable to read the plea documents because his attorney denied his requestfor reading glasses, that 

### the deputy prosecutorand defense counsel changed theterms ofthe plea bargain without his consent, and that he did not committhe charged crimes. But becausethese contentions allrest on factual allegations and materials that are not part ofthe record on appeal, we cannot considerthem. See State v. McFarland, 127 Wn.2d 322, 355, 899 P.2d 1251 (1995) (reviewing courts do not consider matters outside the record in a direct appeal).No. 70499-1-1/2 

### Accordingly, we affirmCorhan's conviction. We reverse the sentence and remand for further proceedings. Affirmed in part, reversed inpart, and remanded.

For The Court: 

# I^O^

'J'- O jr- >,^) c_ m

_ 22 O-'.T 03 O -^;-fl IP- -n: com y O O'J'

• * ....: —•; CO v£>
<PAGE>

                                                                   Exhibit 16.1

BDO SEIDMAN LLP


September 11, 2000


Securities and Exchange Commission
450 Fifth Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C.,  20549


Ladies and Gentlemen:

We have been furnished with a copy of the response to Item 4 of Form 8-K for the
event that occurred on September 6, 2000 to be filed by our former client,
NHancement Technologies Inc. We agree with the statements made in response to
that Item insofar as they relate to our firm.


Very truly yours,

/s/  BDO Seidman LLP
Exhibit 32(a)
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 (2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 Dated: November 17, 2010
    /s/ Saed MohseniSaed MohseniPresident and Chief Executive Officer

(Principal Executive Officer) Dated: November 17, 2010
    /s/ James J. OConnorJames J. OConnorChief Financial Officer, Treasurer and Secretary
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
#### Alvin Glenn MARTINA, Appellant, v. Henry V. EVANS et ux., Appellees.

No. S-39.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

May 17, 1973.

Rehearing Denied June 8, 1973.

Alfred O. Shuler, Shuler & Shuler, Apalachicola, for appellant.

*565Herbert P. Sapp, Jr., Panama City, for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

See Martens v. State, 100 So.2d 440 (3 Fla. App. 1958).

CARROLL, DONALD K., Acting C. J„ and JOHNSON and RAWLS, JJ., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                     102,169,779
<SECURITIES>                                72,132,087
<RECEIVABLES>                               10,879,757
<ALLOWANCES>                                 (250,000)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           189,051,603
<PP&E>                                      19,593,633
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,418,395
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             558,378,087
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       21,299,438
<BONDS>                                      5,344,785
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       370,639
<OTHER-SE>                                 533,199,547
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               558,378,087
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            10,808,039
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                6,334,269
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            25,238,009
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           (18,137,239)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       (18,137,239)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                              (18,137,239)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.51)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.51)


</TABLE>
#### AMERICANA HOTEL, INC. v. ZABLE.

No. 39078.

Supreme Court of Florida.

March 1970.

Rehearing Denied April 22, 1970.

Certiorari denied without opinion. 226 So.2d 272.
In the Matter of: 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

z S^OHlf^J^toERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATIONIN 

• •) /OID 

Bush Air Cargo, Inc. 

. FAA Docket No. Unassigned /QfJ^f^ ^ ^ ' 

Judge Not Assigned (F^ ^ ^ ^ 

ANSWER 

COMES NOW respondent. Bush Air Cargo, Inc., and through the undersigned 

answers the Federal Aviation Administration ("FAA") complaint as follows: 

1. Respondent admits the allegations in paragraph I of the complaint. 

2. Respondent admits the Eillegations in paragraph 11(2) of the complaint. 

3. Respondent admits the allegations in paragraph 11(3) of the complaint. 

4. Respondent admits the allegations in paragraph 11(4) of the complaint. 

5. Respondent admits the allegations in paragraph 11(5) of the complaint. 

6. Respondent denies the allegations in paragraph 111(1) of the complaint. 

7. Respondent denies the allegations in paragraph 111(2) of the complaint. 

8. Respondent denies the allegations in paragraph 111(1) of the complaint 

WHEREFORE respondent requests the administrative law judge to: 

1. Dismiss the FAA's complaint with prejudice; 

2. Alternatively, if found in violation as alleged, find the violation was 

harmless error and assess no penalty; 

3. Alternatively, if foimd in violation as alleged, assess the company a more 

appropriate fine. 

FAAv.BAC 

Answer; Page 1 of 2 
Dated this 23"* day of March, 2010 

Barton M. Tieman, President 

Bush Air Cargo, Inc. 

P.O. Box 93144 

Anchorage, Ak 99509 

(907) 277-7657 Ph 

(907) 274-1725 Fax 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I certify that on March 23, 2010 

A copy(s) of the foregoing was delivered 

by U.S. Mail to: 

(1 copy) 

Office of the Regional Counsel 

Attention: Glen Brown 

222 West 7"" Avenue #14 

Anchorage, Alaska 99513-7587 

(Original and 1 copy) 

Fededral Aviation Administration 

ATTN: Hrg Doc Clk, AGC-430 

Wilbur Wright BIdg-Ste 2Wigg 

800 Independence Avenue, 

Waslvogton, DC 2^ 9 L 

V 

Barton M. Tieman 

FAAv.BAC 

Answer; Page 2 of 2
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 3395

To require the preparation of risk assessments in connection with Federal

health and safety or environmental regulations, and for other purposes.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

OCTOBER 27, 1993

Mr. TAUZIN (for himself, Mr. CONDIT, Mr. STENHOLM, Mr. LAUGHLIN, and

Mr. HAYES) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce

A BILL

To require the preparation of risk assessments in connection

with Federal health and safety or environmental regulations, and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. RISK ASSESSMENTS.

4 (a) PUBLICATION REQUIRED.—In promulgating any

5 final regulation relating to public health and safety or the

6 environment after the date of enactment of this Act, the

7 Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency

8 shall publish each of the following in the Federal Register:
2

•HR 3395 IH

1 (1) An estimate, performed with as much speci2 ficity as practicable, of the risk of the health and

3 safety of individual members of the public addressed

4 by the regulation and its effect on human health or

5 the environment and the costs associated with imple6 mentation of, and compliance with, the regulation.

7 (2) A comparative analysis of the risk ad8 dressed by the regulation relative to other risks to

9 which the public is exposed.

10 (3) The Administrator’s certification that—

11 (A) the estimate under paragraph (1) and

12 the analysis under paragraph (2) are based

13 upon a scientific evaluation of the risk to the

14 health and safety of individual members of the

15 public and to human health or the environment

16 and are supported by the best available sci17 entific data;

18 (B) the regulation will substantially ad19 vance the purpose of protecting the public

20 health and safety or the environment against

21 the specified identified risk; and

22 (C) the regulation will produce benefits to

23 the public health and safety or the environment

24 that will justify the cost to the Government and
3

•HR 3395 IH

1 the public of implementation of and compliance

2 with the regulation.

3 (b) REPORT.—In the event that the Administrator

4 cannot make the certification required under subsection

5 (a), the Administrator shall report to Congress that such

6 certification cannot be made and shall include a statement

7 of the reasons therefor in such report and in the final reg8 ulation.

9 (c) EFFECT OF CERTIFICATION.—The certification

10 required by this section shall not be construed to amend,

11 modify, or alter any statute and shall not be subject to

12 judicial review. Nothing in this section shall be construed

13 to grant a cause of action to any person.

Æ
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS THE SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM APAC
CUSTOMER SERVICES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES FORM 10-Q FOR THE TWENTY-SIX WEEKS
ENDED JULY 2, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH 10-Q
FILING.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUL-02-2000
<CASH>                                          29,060
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   77,377
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,166
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               121,134
<PP&E>                                         133,678
<DEPRECIATION>                                  78,339
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 234,008
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           64,425
<BONDS>                                         96,758
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           495
<OTHER-SE>                                      62,427
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   234,008
<SALES>                                        236,958
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               236,958
<CGS>                                          179,633
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  219,042
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               5,326
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 12,590
<INCOME-TAX>                                     5,036
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              7,554
<DISCONTINUED>                                     115
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     7,669
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .16
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .15


</TABLE>
Exhibit 32



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER



Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted), Anthony J. Bettencourt, Chief Executive Officer of Verity,
Inc. (the Company), and Steven R. Springsteel, the Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certify that, to the best of their knowledge:



1. The Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended November 30, 2004, and to which this Certification
is attached as Exhibit 32, (the Periodic Report) fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2. The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have set their hands hereto as of the 7th day of January, 2005.



/s/ ANTHONY J. BETTENCOURTAnthony J. BettencourtChief Executive Officer and President/s/ STEVEN R. SPRINGSTEELSteven R. SpringsteelSenior Vice President of Finance and Administration and Chief Financial Officer




This
certification accompanies the Form 10-Q to which it relates, is not deemed to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of Verity, Inc. under the Securities Act of 1933, as
amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made before or after the date of the Form 10-Q), irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.
<PAGE>


                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.6

                                 AMENDMENT NO. 1
                                     TO THE
                             DEL LABORATORIES, INC.
                          EMPLOYEE 401(K) SAVINGS PLAN

                               W I T N E S S E T H

         WHEREAS, by the provisions of Article X of the Del Laboratories, Inc.
Employee 401(k) Savings Plan ("Plan"), the Employer has the right to amend the
Plan; and

         WHEREAS, the Employer wishes to amend and clarify certain provisions of
the January 1, 1989, restatement of the Plan;

         NOW THEREFORE, the Plan shall be and it is hereby amended as follows:

                                  FIRST CHANGE

Article 12.02(a) shall be clarified by substituting the following, effective
January 1, 1989:

(a)  The highest rate of Profit Sharing Contributions and forfeitures
     (determined as a percentage of compensation) allocated to the account of
     any Key Employee. However, if the highest rate allocated to a Key Employee
     is less than three percent (3%), amounts contributed as a result of a
     salary reduction agreement must be included in determining contributions
     made on behalf of Key Employees.

                                  SECOND CHANGE

Article 3.03(d) shall be amended by complete deletion.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Employer has executed this amendment to the
Plan this 21st day of December, 1995.

Signed, sealed and delivered in the presence of:

                                                     DEL LABORATORIES, INC.

                                                    By:  s/ Melvyn C. Goldstein

                                                              Employer
#### Grover Allen PRICE, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 67-105.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Third District.

Nov. 14, 1967.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
# Materials Not Included in **Airworthiness Directive (AD) Docket**

Docket Number: F AA- 2013 - 0540 Directorate Identifier: 2012 - NM - 185 -AD

747 - 53A2478, R2 --- 7/15/10 747 - 53A2478, R1 --- 3/27/08 747 - 53 - 2721, R2 --- 3/17/11 7/47 - 53 - 2721, R1 --- 6/24/10 747 - 53 - 2721 --- 5/28/09

Name/Description of Item(s) Not Included in FDMS Docket and Maintained in the Supplemental AD Docket 

### MA **Y BE VIEWED A T:**  Federal Aviation Administration

Transport Airplane Directorate Rules Docket 1601 Lind Ave. SW., Renton, WA 98057 425.227.1221 **DURING THE HOURS OF:** 9 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. Form Date: 0 3/05/2008
# C_2013347EN.01000401.xml

| 28.11.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 347/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.11.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 347/4

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

27 November 2013

2013/C 347/04

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,3596 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 138,43 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4586 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,83405 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 8,9100 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,2305 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,2530 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 27,341 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 299,08 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,7029 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,2036 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,4376 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,7499 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,4952 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4382 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 10,5406 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,6638 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,7056 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 447,24 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 13,8377 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 8,2839 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,6433 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 16 038,43 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,3922 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 59,378 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 44,8979 |
| THB | Thai baht | 43,670 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 3,1311 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 17,8203 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 84,5060 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,3596

JPY

Japanese yen

138,43

DKK

Danish krone

7,4586

GBP

Pound sterling

0,83405

SEK

Swedish krona

8,9100

CHF

Swiss franc

1,2305

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,2530

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

27,341

HUF

Hungarian forint

299,08

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,7029

PLN

Polish zloty

4,2036

RON

Romanian leu

4,4376

TRY

Turkish lira

2,7499

AUD

Australian dollar

1,4952

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4382

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

10,5406

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,6638

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,7056

KRW

South Korean won

1 447,24

ZAR

South African rand

13,8377

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

8,2839

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,6433

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

16 038,43

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,3922

PHP

Philippine peso

59,378

RUB

Russian rouble

44,8979

THB

Thai baht

43,670

BRL

Brazilian real

3,1311

MXN

Mexican peso

17,8203

INR

Indian rupee

84,5060

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
An official website of the United States government                

----

end of header

Census.govNewsroomReleasesCensus 2000

# Newsroom Archive

Skip left menu navigation                          - About the Newsroom
                          - Facts for Features
                          - **News Releases**
                          - Press Kits
                          - Tip Sheets

### Release Information

**CB00-CN.30**
**Contact:**  Decennial Media Relations          301-457-3691/301-457-3620 (fax) 301-457-1037 (TDD) e-mail: 2000usa@census.gov

## FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:  FRIDAY, MARCH 31, 2000

## Census Bureau Reports 50 Percent of Census Forms Have Been Mailed Back

### ** CENSUS BUREAU MEDIA ADVISORY **

The Census Bureau reported today that 50 percent of Census 2000 forms have been returned, according to the latest "initial response rates" published by the Census Bureau. 

States setting the pace in census mail responses include Ohio (58 percent), Nebraska, Michigan, Pennsylvania (all at 57 percent), and Iowa and Massachusetts (56 percent). 

"Although I am very pleased to report these rates today, we still have many more responses to go before," said Census Bureau Director Kenneth Prewitt. 

Daily release of the response rates, which started last Monday and will continue through April 11, cover state and local jurisdictions that are mailing back their census forms — about 39,000 governmental entities.  Prewitt has challenged states, local and tribal governments to surpass 1990 mail response rates by at least 5 percentage points as part of a promotional campaign, How America Knows What America Needs.

The Census Bureau also is reporting today that 322 jurisdictions have met the How America Knows What American Needs target. 

"The census is as important to our nation as highways and telephone lines. It's how America knows what America needs," added Prewitt. "It will provide the data that will help target more than $2 trillion in federal funds during the next decade for schools, employment services, housing assistance, hospital services, programs for the elderly and much more." 

To review the daily initial response rates, visit the Census Bureau's Web site at <https://www.census.gov>. For questions relating to filling out the form, please call 1-800-471-9424. 

CONNECT WITH US**********

                            - Information Quality
                            - Data Linkage Infrastructure
                            - Data Protection and Privacy Policy
                            - Accessibility
                            - FOIA
                            - Inspector General
                            - No FEAR Act
                            - U.S. Department of Commerce
                            - USA.gov

----

Measuring America's People, Places, and Economy

Is this page helpful?
YesNo

NO THANKS

255 characters maximum255 characters maximum reached

Thank you for your feedback.Comments or suggestions? 

PIO@census.gov
#### In re Donald S. KLEIN.

No. 54344.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Feb. 1, 1974.

In re: Donald S. Klein applying for Reinstatement ' of License to Practice Law.

Application for reinstatement granted.