alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Brighter, Bolder, Better



# Amadeus Ancillary Services

for airlines

August 2012© 2012 Amadeus IT Group SA

Page 2 of 6 Brighter, Bolder, Better



# Overview

The Amadeus Distribution Platform offers a comprehensive range of solutions all of which

are carefully designed to meet an airline’s specific sales & distribution needs.

Designed to enhance the entire process of travel agency distribution – from product display

and sales facilitation to sales optimisation and post-sales business analysis.

Amadeus specialized portfolios contain a range of distribution solutions to enable and

enhance each of these steps for tailored distribution needs.

In relation of optional services, the followi ng pages describe two specific Amadeus solutions:

• Amadeus Ancillary Services

Enables airlines to maximize revenue and profits by selling ancillary services through all

sales channels and at each touch point between the airline and its customers.

The Amadeus ancillary services product is already in use. At this time, six airlines 1 

### are using

the product in the GDS channel, and up to 17 have signed up. In addition, 17 airlines are

using the product in other distribution channels and up to 44 airlines have signed up to use

Amadeus technology to sell Ancillary Services. No U.S. airlines have signed up for this

service.

• Amadeus Electronic Miscellaneous Documents Server

Amadeus Electronic Miscellaneous Documents Serv er (EMD Server) enables the airlines to

reduce costs, improve revenue collection and enhance customer experience, eliminating

manual paper processes, supporting the collection of all ancillary services types or providing

interline and multi-coupon EMDs.

Currently, up to 56 airlines have contracted Amadeus’ EMD Server. Amadeus created the

word’s first interline EMD link between Finnair and Egypt Air.

Amadeus Ancillary Services and EMD Server are available for airlines globally and our

merchandising solutions allow a great level of personalization for example by adjusting

pricing or availability according to frequent flye r number, or tailored according to bilateral

agreements between Travel Management Co mpanies (TMCs) and corporations.

The following pages include a brief description of the products mentioned above

1 Qantas, Air France, CorsairFly, KLM, Iberia and Finnair© 2012 Amadeus IT Group SA

Pa g e 3 of 6 B righter, Bo l der, Bette r© 2012 Amadeus IT Group SA

Pa g e 4 of 6 B righter, Bo l der, Bette r© 2012 Amadeus IT Group SA

Pa g e 5 of 6 B righter, Bo l der, Bette r© 2012 Amadeus IT Group SA

Pa g e 6 of 6 B righter, Bo l der, Bette r
# C_2016328EN.01001501.xml

| 6.9.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 328/15 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.9.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 328/15

---

P8_TA(2015)0093

Amendment of the multiannual financial framework for the years 2014-2020 ***

European Parliament legislative resolution of 15 April 2015 on the draft Council regulation amending Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 1311/2013 laying down the multiannual financial framework for the years 2014/2020 (05479/2015 — C8-0047/2015 — 2015/0010(APP))

(Special legislative procedure — consent)

(2016/C 328/06)

The European Parliament,

The European Parliament

| — | having regard to the draft Council regulation (05479/2015), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the draft Council regulation (05479/2015),

| — | having regard to the request for consent submitted by the Council in accordance with Article 312 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union and Article 106a of Treaty establishing the European Atomic Energy Community (C8-0047/2015), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the request for consent submitted by the Council in accordance with Article 312 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union and Article 106a of Treaty establishing the European Atomic Energy Community (C8-0047/2015),

| — | having regard to its resolution of 15 April 2014 on negotiations on the MFF 2014-2020: lessons to be learned and the way forward (1), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to its resolution of 15 April 2014 on negotiations on the MFF 2014-2020: lessons to be learned and the way forward (1),

1

| — | having regard to Rule 86 and Rule 99(1), first and third subparagraphs, of its Rules of Procedure, |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to Rule 86 and Rule 99(1), first and third subparagraphs, of its Rules of Procedure,

| — | having regard to the recommendation of the Committee on Budgets and the opinion of the Committee on Regional Development (A8-0125/2015), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the recommendation of the Committee on Budgets and the opinion of the Committee on Regional Development (A8-0125/2015),

| 1. | Gives its consent to the draft Council regulation amending Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 1311/2013 laying down the multiannual financial framework for the years 2014-2020 as set out in annex to this resolution; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Gives its consent to the draft Council regulation amending Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 1311/2013 laying down the multiannual financial framework for the years 2014-2020 as set out in annex to this resolution;

| 2. | Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council, the Commission and the national parliaments. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council, the Commission and the national parliaments.

---

(1)  Texts adopted, P7_TA(2014)0378.

1

---

ANNEX

COUNCIL REGULATION

(EU, Euratom) 2015/...

amending Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 1311/2013 laying down the multiannual financial framework for the years 2014-2020

(The text of this annex is not reproduced here since it corresponds to the final act, Council Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2015/623.)

---
SCWC-16-0000627

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI‘I 

________________________________________________________________ 

ASSOCIATION OF CONDOMINIUM HOMEOWNERS

OF TROPICS AT WAIKELE, by its Board of Directors,

Respondent/Plaintiff-Appellee,

vs.

PATSY NAOMI SAKUMA, Petitioner/Defendant-Appellant,

and

FIRST HAWAIIAN BANK, a Hawai‘i corporation; and

WAIKELE COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION, a Hawai‘i nonprofit 

corporation, Respondents/Defendants-Appellees

________________________________________________________________ 

CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS

(CAAP-16-0000627; CIV. NO. 1CC071001487)

ORDER REJECTING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI

(By: Nakayama, Acting C.J., McKenna, Wilson, and Eddins, JJ., 

with Circuit Judge Tonaki, in place of Recktenwald, C.J., 

recused.)

Petitioner/Defendant-Appellant Patsy Sakuma’s application

Electronically Filed

Supreme Court

SCWC-16-0000627

05-MAY-2021

10:57 AM

Dkt. 11 ODAC
2

for writ of certiorari filed on March 23, 2021, is hereby 

rejected. 

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai‘i, May 5, 2021. 

/s/ Paula A. Nakayama

/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna

/s/ Michael D. Wilson

/s/ Todd W. Eddins

/s/ John M. Tonaki
# C_2014025EN.01000601.xml

| 28.1.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 25/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.1.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 25/6

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

27 January 2014

2014/C 25/05

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,3658 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 140,39 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4620 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,82505 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 8,8057 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,2267 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,4380 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 27,475 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 304,93 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,1974 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,5372 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 3,1650 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,5618 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,5080 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 10,6050 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,6561 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,7444 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 477,22 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 15,2239 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 8,2593 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,6455 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 16 616,78 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,5652 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 61,962 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 47,2193 |
| THB | Thai baht | 44,921 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 3,2747 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 18,2949 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 86,1840 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,3658

JPY

Japanese yen

140,39

DKK

Danish krone

7,4620

GBP

Pound sterling

0,82505

SEK

Swedish krona

8,8057

CHF

Swiss franc

1,2267

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,4380

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

27,475

HUF

Hungarian forint

304,93

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

PLN

Polish zloty

4,1974

RON

Romanian leu

4,5372

TRY

Turkish lira

3,1650

AUD

Australian dollar

1,5618

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,5080

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

10,6050

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,6561

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,7444

KRW

South Korean won

1 477,22

ZAR

South African rand

15,2239

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

8,2593

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,6455

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

16 616,78

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,5652

PHP

Philippine peso

61,962

RUB

Russian rouble

47,2193

THB

Thai baht

44,921

BRL

Brazilian real

3,2747

MXN

Mexican peso

18,2949

INR

Indian rupee

86,1840

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
#### STATE of Florida, Petitioner, v. William REDDICK, Respondent.

No. 35924.

Supreme Court of Florida.

May 24, 1967.

Earl Faircloth, Atty. Gen., and William D. Roth, Asst. Atty. Gen., for petitioner.

John J. Duffy, Clearwater, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of certiorari reflected apparent jurisdiction in this Court. We issued the writ and have heard oral argument of the parties. After hearing argument and upon further consideration of the matter we have determined that the cited decisions present no direct conflict as required by Article V, Section 4, Florida Constitution, F.S.A. Therefore, the writ must be and is hereby discharged and the petition for writ of certiorari is dismissed.

It is so ordered.

THORNAL, C. J., and THOMAS, ROBERTS, DREW and O’CONNELL, JJ., concur.
**Exhibit 99.2**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED****PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the AnnualReport of U.S. Xpress Enterprises, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ending December 31, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned hereby certifies,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350 (as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002) that he is the Chief Financial Officer of the Company and that: (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

  

|                                                                                   |   |   |   |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|--------|
| /s/ RAY M. HARLIN                                                                      |   |   |   |
|                                                                                        |   |   |   |
| **Ray M. Harlin****Executive Vice President of Finance****and ChiefFinancial Officer** |   |   |   |
|                                                                                   |   |   |   |
| Date: March 31, 2003                                                                   |   |   |   |
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Marline WINIARSKI.

No. 62474.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

June 30, 1978.

In re: Marline Winiarski applying for writ of review. Parish of Catahoula.

Writ granted. Ruling of the trial judge denying motion to suppress is set aside; case remanded to district court for new suppression hearing in accordance with law. La.Code Crim.P. art. 703 C. See *State v. Schmidt,*359 So.2d 133 (La.1978); *State v. Braud,*357 So.2d 545 (La.1978); *State v. Franklin,*353 So.2d 1315 (La.1977).
Exhibit 31.1
**CERTIFICATIONS**
I, Larry H. Keener, certify that:
 1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Palm HarborHomes, Inc. (the “registrant”);  2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain anyuntrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material factnecessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstancesunder which such statements were made, not misleading with respect tothe period covered by this annual report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and otherfinancial information included in this annual report, fairly present inall material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presentedin this annual report;  4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d –15(e) for theregistrant and have:
 a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, orcaused such disclosures controls and procedures to be designedunder our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this annualreport is being prepared;  b. Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’sdisclosure controls and procedures and presented in this annualreport our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures as of the end of the period covered bythis report based on such evaluation; and  c. Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting that occurred duringthe registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
 5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed,based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financialreporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee ofregistrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):
 a. all significant deficiencies and material weaknessesin the design or operation of internal controls over financialreporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and  b. any fraud, whether or not material, that involvesmanagement or other employees who have a significant role in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting.     Date: May 3, 2004     By: /s/ Larry H. Keener       Larry H. Keener   Chief Executive Officer
#### Mrs. Ruth GUEST and Debra Kaye Guest v. Norman ROSS and Emma L. Ross.

No. 44276.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

Feb. 13, 1967.

Troutt & Moore, Senatobia, B. G. Perry, Horn Lake, for appellants.

Houston, Huggins & Hamberlin, South-aven, for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 04-6771

KRAIG SAVAGE, Petitioner - Appellant, versus WARDEN, DILLWYN CORRECTIONAL CENTER, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, District Judge. (CA-04-69) Submitted: August 12, 2004 Decided: August 19, 2004 Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Kraig Savage, Appellant Pro Se. Eugene Paul Murphy, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: Kraig Savage seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000). The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that his constitutional claims are debatable and that any dispositive procedural rulings by the district court are also debatable or wrong. See Miller-El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee , 252 F.3d 676, 683 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Savage has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
R9AirPermits to: Omer Shalev 09/24/2012 03:18 PM

Sent by: Geoffrey Glass

----- Forwarded by Geoffrey Glass/R9/USEPA/US on 09/24/2012 03:18 PM -----

MARSHALL to: R9AirPermits 09/23/2012 04:32 AM

I live across the highway from S. P. in Anderson and the last week or so I've noticed alot of brown smoke 

coming out of the generating facility they already have. My question is , have they only started running it in 

the day time recently. I don't ever remember seeing the smoke. I figured they only ran at night .I would 

have to be against it if we will be increasing the amount of brown smoke--- SMOG-- IF YOU WILL INTO 

THE AIR. Marshall Knauss, 6220 Dolores ave
#### Howard C. RIFE, Appellant, v. MOTEL INVESTORS, INC., a Montana corporation, not licensed to do business in the State of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1698.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Fourth District.

Sept. 23, 1968.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
<PAGE>


                                                               EXHIBIT 3(ii).6


                      BURNHAM PACIFIC PROPERTIES, INC.
                            (the "Corporation")


                            AMENDMENT TO BYLAWS


     On August 27, 2000, the Board of Directors of the Corporation amended
the Bylaws of the Corporation by:

     Deleting therefrom the second sentence of ARTICLE II, Section 13(a)(2) in
its entirety and inserting the following in lieu thereof:

          "To be timely, a stockholder's notice shall be delivered to the
     secretary at the principal executive offices of the Corporation not
     later than the close of business on the 47th day nor earlier than the
     close of business on the 90th day prior to the first anniversary of the
     preceding year's annual meeting; provided however, that in the event
     that the date of the annual meeting is advanced by more than 30 days or
     delayed by more than 60 days from such anniversary date or if the
     Corporation has not previously held an annual meeting, notice by the
     stockholder to be timely must be so delivered not earlier than the close
     of business on the 90th day prior to such annual meeting and not later
     than the close of business on the later of the 47th day prior to such
     annual meeting or the tenth day following the day on which public
     announcement of the date of such meeting is first made by the
     Corporation."
United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

November 1, 2004

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 04-30145

 

In The Matter of: JOSEPHINE D. DIMITRI

Debtor.

-------------------------

JOSEPHINE D. DIMITRI,

Appellant,

versus

WILLIAM C. GARRETT, Succession of; GRANVILLE SEMMES,

Individually and as executrix of the Succession of William C.

Garrett; DEBE GARRETT LEVIS, Individually and as executrix

of the Succession of William C. Garrett; BILLIE GARRETT

SEMMES, Individually and as executrix of the Succession of

William C. Garrett,

Appellees.

______________________

In The Matter of: JOSEPHINE D. DIMITRI

Debtor.

-------------------------

JOSEPHINE D. DIMITRI,

Appellant,
2

versus

GRANVILLE SEMMES, Individually and as executrix of the

Succession of William C. Garrett; DEBE GARRETT LEVIS,

Individually and as executrix of the Succession of William C.

Garrett; BILLIE GARRETT SEMMES, Individually and as

executrix of the Succession of William C. Garrett; WILLIAM

C. GARRETT, Succession of,

Appellees.

____________________

In The Matter of: JOSEPHINE D. DIMITRI

Debtor.

-------------------------

JOSEPHINE D. DIMITRI,

Appellant,

versus

GRANVILLE SEMMES, Individually and as executrix of the

Succession of William C. Garrett; DEBE GARRETT LEVIS,

Individually and as executrix of the Succession of William C.

Garrett; BILLIE GARRETT SEMMES, Individually and as

executrix of the Succession of William C. Garrett; WILLIAM

C. GARRETT, Succession of,

Appellees.

 

Appeal from the United States District Court for

the Eastern District of Louisiana

(USDC No. 03-CV-3241)

_______________________________________________________
*Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that this opinion should not be

published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R.

47.5.4.

3

Before REAVLEY, BENAVIDES and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The bankruptcy court properly exercised its powers in lifting the automatic stay

arising from a Chapter 11 bankruptcy petition filed in bad faith. 11 U.S.C.A. § 105(a);

see In re Little Creek Development Co., 779 F.2d 1068, 1071 (5th Cir. 1986). Further,

the court granted the motion to dismiss, based on bad faith of the filing, as demonstrated

by the record. See 11 U.S.C. § 1112(b); see In re Little Creek, 779 F.2d at 1072. The

district court was also correct in denying the motions for reconsideration and a new trial. 

See Brown v. Wright, 588 F.2d 708, 710 (9th Cir. 1978); see also Johnston v. Lucas, 786

F.2d 1254, 1257 (5th Cir. 1986). Finally, the “NASCO” motion was properly denied as it

was without merit. Chambers v. NASCO, Inc., 501 U.S. 32, 115 L.Ed.2d 27, 111 S.Ct

2123, 2132 (1991).

AFFIRMED.