alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Final Listing of Questionnaire Files for Steam Electric Rulemaking Record

Plant ID 02512

Removed 

from Public 

(Non-CBI) 

Docket1

Copyright 

Flag2

File Name Description

02512\02512_Completeness_Checklist.xls EPA Completeness Review Checklist

02512\02512_HardcopyLog.doc EPA log of hardcopy documents submitted

x 02512\02512_PartA.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 02512\02512_PartE.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 02512\02512_PartH.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 02512\02512_PlantID_Checklist.xls EPA Technical Review Checklist Workbook

02512\Certification Statement Plant ID 02512.pdf Plant certification statement

02512\Supporting Documentation\02512_Redhawk_02512_A5_Q2_Maps_1and2.ppt Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 02512\Supporting Documentation\02512_Redhawk_02512_A5_Q3_WaterBalanceDiagram.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 02512\Supporting Documentation\REDHAWK_02512_A11_6_Algae Wastewater Analysis.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

02512\Supporting Documentation\02512_ICR CoverLetter.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

2

 Copyright documents are available from the docket. 

1

 Final reviewed survey responses are located in the Steam Electric Technical Questionnaire Database .
# C_2014336EN.01002201.xml

| 26.9.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 336/22 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.9.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 336/22

---

Information communicated by Member States regarding closure of fisheries

(2014/C 336/08)

In accordance with Article 35(3) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1224/2009 of 20 November 2009 establishing a Community control system for ensuring compliance with the rules of the common fisheries policy (1), a decision has been taken to close the fishery as set down in the following table:

1

| Date and time of closure | 28.8.2014 |
| --- | --- |
| Duration | 28.8.2014-31.12.2014 |
| Member State | Ireland |
| Stock or group of stocks | ALF/3X14- |
| Species | Alfonsinos (Beryx spp.) |
| Zone | EU and international waters of III, IV, V, VI, VII, VIII, IX, X, XII and XIV |
| Type(s) of fishing vessels | — |
| Reference number | 34/DSS |

Date and time of closure

28.8.2014

Duration

28.8.2014-31.12.2014

Member State

Ireland

Stock or group of stocks

ALF/3X14-

Species

Alfonsinos (Beryx spp.)

Beryx

Zone

EU and international waters of III, IV, V, VI, VII, VIII, IX, X, XII and XIV

Type(s) of fishing vessels

—

Reference number

34/DSS

---

(1)  OJ L 343, 22.12.2009, p. 1.

1

---
EXHIBIT 23.0













CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT
REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM






The Board
of Directors


CPI
Corp.:




We
consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements No.
333-142077, No. 333-124611, No. 333-08634, No. 333-08636, No. 333-64296, and No.
33-19981 on Forms S-8 of CPI Corp. of our reports dated May 8, 2008, with
respect to the consolidated balance sheets of CPI Corp. and subsidiaries as of
February 2, 2008 and February 3, 2007, and the related consolidated statements
of operations, changes in stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the
years in the three-year period ended February 2, 2008, and the effectiveness of
internal control over financial reporting as of February 2, 2008, which reports
appear in the February 2, 2008 annual report on Form 10-K of CPI
Corp.
 
 Our
report dated May 8, 2008 with respect to the consolidated financial
statements refers to CPI Corp.’s adoption of the provisions of Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 123 (Revised 2004), Share-Based Payment, in 2006 and the
provisions of SFAS No. 158, Employers’
Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and Other Postretirement Plans, in
2006.
 
 Our
report dated May 8, 2008 with respect to the consolidated financial
statements states that the Company’s consolidated statements of operations,
changes in stockholders’ equity and cash flows for the year ended February 4,
2006 have been restated.
 
 Our
report dated May 8, 2008 on the effectiveness of internal control over
financial reporting as of February 2, 2008 expresses our opinion that the
Company did not maintain effective internal control over financial reporting as
of February 2, 2008 because of the effect of material weaknesses on the
achievement of the objectives of the control criteria and contains an
explanatory paragraph that states that the existence of three material
weaknesses resulted in more than a remote likelihood that a material
misstatement of the Company's annual or interim financial statements would not
be prevented or detected in various account balances.





/s/
      KPMG LLPKPMG
      LLP

















St.
Louis, Missouri


May 8,
2008
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk's Office, Atlanta, March 03, 2020.

I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes 

of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto 

affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Court of Appeals 

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA, March 03, 2020

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order

A20I0182. TERRY D. JACKSON et al. v. LANETTE YVONNE JONES.

Upon consideration of the Application for Interlocutory Appeal, it is ordered that it be 

hereby GRANTED. The Appellant may file a Notice of Appeal within 10 days of the date of 

this order. The Clerk of Superior Court is directed to include a copy of this order in the record 

transmitted to the Court of Appeals.

LC NUMBERS:

2017CV288999
## In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

No. 02

- 19

- 00410

- CR

K IRK L YNN W RIGHT

, Appellant

V

.

T HE S TATE OF T EXAS §

§

§

§

§ On Appeal from the 297th District

Court

of Tarrant C ounty (1565460D)

December 5, 2019

Opinion by Chief Justice Sudderth

(nfp)

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that the

appeal should be dismissed. It is ordered that the appeal is dismissed

.

SECOND DISTRIC T COURT OF APPEALS

By

__ /s/ Bonnie Sudderth

_______________ Chief Justice Bonnie Sudderth
# C_2014044EN.01000401.xml

| 15.2.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 44/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.2.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 44/4

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

14 February 2014

(2014/C 44/05)

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,3707 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 139,48 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4620 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,82035 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 8,8486 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,2221 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,3550 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 27,436 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 309,05 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,1495 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,4850 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,9962 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,5176 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,5017 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 10,6306 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,6379 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,7289 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 453,10 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 14,9803 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 8,3162 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,6560 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 16 208,53 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,5160 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 61,102 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 48,0840 |
| THB | Thai baht | 44,296 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 3,2837 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 18,1673 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 84,9080 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,3707

JPY

Japanese yen

139,48

DKK

Danish krone

7,4620

GBP

Pound sterling

0,82035

SEK

Swedish krona

8,8486

CHF

Swiss franc

1,2221

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,3550

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

27,436

HUF

Hungarian forint

309,05

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

PLN

Polish zloty

4,1495

RON

Romanian leu

4,4850

TRY

Turkish lira

2,9962

AUD

Australian dollar

1,5176

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,5017

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

10,6306

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,6379

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,7289

KRW

South Korean won

1 453,10

ZAR

South African rand

14,9803

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

8,3162

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,6560

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

16 208,53

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,5160

PHP

Philippine peso

61,102

RUB

Russian rouble

48,0840

THB

Thai baht

44,296

BRL

Brazilian real

3,2837

MXN

Mexican peso

18,1673

INR

Indian rupee

84,9080

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
Exhibit



EXHIBIT 10.57



AMENDMENT TO THE AMENDED AND RESTATED
ASHLAND INC. SUPPLEMENTAL EARLY
RETIREMENT PLAN FOR CERTAIN EMPLOYEES


WHEREAS, Ashland Inc. (“Ashland”), maintains the Amended and Restated Ashland Inc. Supplemental Early Retirement Plan for Certain Employees (the “Plan”) for the benefit of employees eligible to participate therein; and
WHEREAS, Ashland is the sponsor of the Plan; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to Article IV, Section 5, of the Charter of the Personnel and Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of Ashland Inc., said Personnel and Compensation Committee (the “Committee”) has retained authority to amend or transfer any of the benefit plans of Ashland and its subsidiaries and affiliates that are more than 50% owned by Ashland; and
WHEREAS, the Committee has approved the transfer of the sponsorship of the Plan from Ashland to Valvoline LLC; and
WHEREAS, the Chief Financial Officer of Ashland Inc. has been delegated the authority by the Committee to prepare and execute any and all amendments necessary to give effect to this decision of the Committee.   
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, the Plan is amended, effective September 1, 2016, as follows:


		
	I.
	The following sentence is added to Section 1.01 of the Plan:


“In accordance with a corporate reorganization, effective as of September 1, 2016, sponsorship of the Plan was transferred from Ashland Inc. to Valvoline LLC (“Valvoline”).”
		
	II.
	All references in the Plan to “Ashland” and “Ashland Inc.” after Section 1.01 are hereinafter changed to “Valvoline” and “Valvoline LLC” respectively.


		
	III.
	In all other respects the Plan shall remain unchanged.




IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Chief Financial Officer has caused this amendment to the Plan to be executed this __________ day of                 , 2016.


       /s/ J. Kevin Willis
By:                                                       
Chief Financial Officer, Ashland Inc.
1... Sitting by assignment.

i i i i i i

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-08-00120-CR

Fernando MARROQUIN,

Appellant

v. 

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 186th Judicial District Court of Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2005-CR-5884

Honorable Pat Priest, Judge Presiding1

Opinion by: Steven C. Hilbig, Justice

Sitting: Karen Angelini, Justice

Rebecca Simmons, Justice

Steven C. Hilbig, Justice

Delivered and Filed: December 3, 2008

MOTION TO WITHDRAW GRANTED; AFFIRMED

Fernando Marroquin pled nolo contendere to felony driving while intoxicated pursuant to a

plea agreement. The trial court assessed a six year sentence in accordance with the agreement,

suspended imposition of the sentence, and placed Marroquin on community supervision. The State

later filed a motion to revoke, alleging Marroquin violated various conditions of his community

supervision. After Marroquin pled true to nine of the alleged violations, the trial court revoked his
-2-

community supervision and sentenced him to four years imprisonment in the Texas Department of

Criminal Justice - Institutional Division. Marroquin appeals. 

Marroquin’s court-appointed appellate attorney filed a motion to withdraw and a brief in

which she raises arguable points of error, but nonetheless concludes this appeal is frivolous and

without merit. The brief meets the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), High

v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807 (Tex. Crim. App. 1978), and Gainous v. State, 436 S.W.2d 137 (Tex. Crim.

App. 1969). Counsel states Marroquin was provided a copy of the brief and motion to withdraw and

informed of his right to review the record and file his own brief. He has not done so.

After reviewing the record and counsel’s brief, we find no reversible error and agree with

counsel the appeal is wholly frivolous. See Bledsoe v. State, 178 S.W.3d 824, 826-27 (Tex. Crim.

App. 2005). We therefore grant the motion to withdraw filed by Marroquin’s counsel and affirm the

trial court’s judgment. See id.; Nichols v. State, 954 S.W.2d 83, 86 (Tex. App.–San Antonio 1997,

no pet.); Bruns v. State, 924 S.W.2d 176, 177 n.1 (Tex. App.–San Antonio 1996, no pet.).

No substitute counsel will be appointed. Should Marroquin wish to seek further review of

this case by the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals, he must either retain an attorney to file a petition

for discretionary review or file a pro se petition for discretionary review. Any petition for

discretionary review must be filed within thirty days from the date of either this opinion or the last

timely motion for rehearing that is overruled by this court. See TEX.R.APP. P. 68.2. Any petition for

discretionary review must be filed with this court, after which it will be forwarded to the Texas Court

of Criminal Appeals along with the rest of the filings in this case. See id. R. 68.3. Any petition for

discretionary review must comply with the requirements of Rule 68.4 of Texas Rules of Appellate

Procedure. See id. R. 68.4.

Steven C. Hilbig, Justice 

Do not publish
# C_2014408EN.01001601.xml

| 15.11.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 408/16 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.11.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 408/16

---

EUROPEAN TRAINING FOUNDATION

Publication of the final accounts for the financial year 2013

2014/C 408/16

The complete version of the final accounts may be found at the following address:

http://www.etf.europa.eu/wpubdocs.nsf/0/0D6C651E7913244EC1257CEF0040821F/$File/GB14DEC006_EN.pdf

---
EXHIBIT 32.1




CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 USC, SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Quarterly Report of Heartland Bridge Capital, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on or about the date hereof (the “Report”), I, James F. Groelinger, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2) Information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Dated: May 16, 2011

/s/ James F. GroelingerBy:
James F. GroelingerChief Executive Officer




A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Heartland Bridge Capital, Inc. and will be retained by Heartland Bridge Capital, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
`[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3186 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.R.3186
                       One Hundred Third Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America


                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

          Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,
 the twenty-fifth day of January, one thousand nine hundred and ninety-
                                  four


                                 An Act

  
 
  To designate the United States courthouse located in Houma, Louisiana, 
as the

          ``George Arceneaux, Jr., United States Courthouse''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The United States courthouse located at 800 East Main Street in 
Houma, Louisiana, is designated as the ``George Arceneaux, Jr., United 
States Courthouse''.

SEC. 2. LEGAL REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, regulation, document, record, map, or other 
paper of the United States to the courthouse referred to in section 1 is 
deemed to be a reference to the ``George Arceneaux, Jr., United States 
Courthouse''.







                                Speaker of the House of Representatives.







                             Vice President of the United States and    
                                                President of the Senate.`
ex10-64.htm


Exhibit 10.70

 

 



 

 

Complementary Agreement of Land Mortgage Loan Contract 

 

Party A (Lender): Shijiazhuang Zhongbo Automobile Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as "Party A") 

 

Party B (Borrower): Northern Altair Nanotechnologies Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as "Party B") 

 

1. Party A and Party B signed two sums of land mortgage loan contracts respectively in September 2015 and March 2016; the total amount of the two loan contract is RMB 59,400,000.00. After friendly negotiation of both parties, the loan interest of Article I under the original contract has changed as: The loan interest of the two sums in 2015 and 2016 is zero; it begins to calculate interest accrual from 2017. 

 

2. The original contract clauses are invariant. 

 

3. This agreement is in quadruplicate with Party A and Party B holding two respectively. 

 

	
Party A: Shijiazhuang Zhongbo Automobile Co., Ltd. 



Shijiazhuang Zhongbo Automobile Co., Ltd. (Seal) 
	
Party B: Northern Altair Nanotechnologies Co., Ltd. 



Northern Altair Nanotechnologies Co., Ltd. 

	
Legal representative (or authorized representative): Sun Guohua


	
Legal representative (or authorized representative): Wei Guohua 



	
MM/DD/YYYY 
	
MM/DD/YYYY
`[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3321 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.R.3321
                       One Hundred Third Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America


                          AT THE FIRST SESSION

          Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,
  the fifth day of January, one thousand nine hundred and ninety-three


                                 An Act


 
   To provide increased flexibility to States in carrying out the Low-
                 Income Home Energy Assistance Program.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. INCREASED STATE FLEXIBILITY IN THE LOW-INCOME HOME ENERGY 
ASSISTANCE PROGRAM.
    Section 927 of the Housing and Community Development Act of 1992 
(Public Law 102-550) is amended--
        (1) in subsection (a)--
            (A) by striking the parenthetical phrase; and
            (B) by inserting before the period ``, except as provided in 
        subsection (d)'';
        (2) in subsection (b)--
            (A) by striking ``such'' and inserting in lieu thereof ``or 
        receiving energy''; and
            (B) by inserting before the period ``for any program in 
        which eligibility or benefits are based on need, except as 
        provided in subsection (d)''; and
        (3) by inserting at the end thereof the following new 
    subsection:
    ``(d) Special Rule for Low-Income Home Energy Assistance Program.--
For purposes of the Low-Income Home Energy Assistance Program, tenants 
described in subsection (a)(2) who are responsible for paying some or 
all heating or cooling costs shall not have their eligibility 
automatically denied. A State may consider the amount of the heating or 
cooling component of utility allowances received by tenants described in 
subsection (a)(2) when setting benefit levels under the Low-Income Home 
Energy Assistance Program. The size of any reduction in Low-Income Home 
Energy Assistance Program benefits must be reasonably related to the 
amount of the heating or cooling component of the utility allowance 
received and must ensure that the highest level of assistance will be 
furnished to those households with the lowest incomes and the highest 
energy costs in relation to income, taking into account family size, in 
compliance with section 2605(b)(5) of the Low-Income Home Energy 
Assistance Act of 1981 (42 U.S.C. 8624(b)(5)).''.







                                Speaker of the House of Representatives.







                             Vice President of the United States and    
                                                President of the Senate.`
### T E X A S C O U R T O F A P P E A L S , T H I R D D I S T R I C T , A T A U S T I N

NO. 03-09-00652- CR

John B ender, Appellant

v. The State of Texas, App ellee

F ROM TH E DISTRI CT COURT O F TRAVIS CO UNTY, 331 ST JUDICI AL DISTRICT NO. D-1 -DC- 08- 9041 09, H ONO RAB LE CHARLES E. M ILLER JR., JUDGE P RESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N PER C URIAM

A p p e lla nt’s appointed counsel has filed a motion to withdraw. In her motion, counse l states that appellant is an attorney , but not curr ently licensed to prac tice. She say s that “[s] ince the inception of this appea l, [she] has been in a strug g le with the Appellant over who is the appellate lawyer in this case .” She states that instead of the brief that she has been prepa ring , appellant wants her to file a brief that he has written but that counsel is unwilling to sign. Counsel states that she and appellant ag ree that she should withdraw to allow appellant to pursue the appea l himself. Attache d to the motion is a letter

from appe llant confirminghis desire to represe nt himself. The motion is g rante d in part. The appea l is abate d and the cause is rema nded to the district court. Upon rema nd, the court shall promptly conduct a hear ing at which appellant shall be admonished of t h e d i sadvanta g es of self-r epre sentation and evidenc e shall be develope d as towhether appellant ’ s d e c is io n to r e li n quish the benef its of counsel is knowing ly and voluntarily made. I f appellant per s i s t s i n his reque st to dismiss counsel, the district court shall allow counsel to withdraw f

rom the ca se and make ava ilable to appellant a copy of the appellate rec ord. Appe llant will have thirty

day s from the date of the he aringto file a pro se brief. A supplemental rec ord, including the repor ter’s rec ord of the hear ing a nd copies of all order s entere d by

the district court, shall be f iled with the Clerk by

October 25, 2010.

Be fore Chief J ustice Jones, J ustices Pury ear and Pember

ton Abated Filed: September

10, 2010 Do Not Publish

2
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 3368

To provide that each State may furnish one additional statue for placement

in National Statuary Hall in the Capitol, and for other purposes.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

OCTOBER 26, 1993

Mr. PETERSON of Florida introduced the following bill; which was referred to

the Committee on House Administration

A BILL

To provide that each State may furnish one additional statue

for placement in National Statuary Hall in the Capitol,

and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That section 1814 of the Revised Statutes of the United

4 States (40 U.S.C. 187) is amended—

5 (1) in the second sentence, by striking out

6 ‘‘two’’ and inserting in lieu thereof ‘‘three’’; and

7 (2) by adding at the end the following new sen8 tences: ‘‘A State may not furnish any additional

9 statue during the first 100 years after the date on

10 which it furnishes its third statue under this section.
2

•HR 3368 IH

1 A State shall be entitled to furnish one additional

2 statue in each later 100-year period.’’.

Æ