alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 11.1


                                  VERITY, INC.

            STATEMENT OF COMPUTATION OF NET INCOME AND LOSS PER SHARE
                    (In thousands, except per share amounts)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                     Three Months Ended               Nine Months Ended
                                                                   Feb. 29         Feb. 28         Feb. 29          Feb. 28
                                                                     1996            1997            1996             1997
                                                                     ----            ----            ----             ----
<S>                                                                <C>            <C>              <C>             <C>
Primary and Fully Diluted:
  Weighted average common shares outstanding for the period         10,279          10,841           5,766           10,800
  Common equivalent shares pursuant to Staff Accounting
    Bulletin No. 83 .......................................             --              --           1,118               --
  Common equivalent shares from dilutive stock options ....            826              --              --               --
                                                                   -------        --------         -------         --------
Shares used in per share calculation ......................         11,105          10,841           6,884           10,800
                                                                   =======        ========         =======         ========
Net income (loss) before accretion ........................        $   112        $(10,825)        $  (662)        $(11,886)
Accretion to redemption value of mandatorily redeemable
  preferred stock .........................................             --              --            (611)              --
                                                                   -------        --------         -------         --------
Net income (loss) applicable to common stockholders .......        $   112        $(10,825)        $(1,273)        $(11,886)
                                                                   =======        ========         =======         ========
Net income (loss) per share ...............................        $  0.01        $  (1.00)        $ (0.18)        $  (1.10)
                                                                   =======        ========         =======         ========
</TABLE>



                                       20
Exhibit 32.01   CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Quarterly Report of Mokita, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending May 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Irma N. Colón-Alonso, Chief Executive and Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.   /s/ Irma N. Colón-Alonso By: Irma N. Colón-Alonso Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer  Dated: July 12, 2011  A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### Mario MACHIN, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 72-669.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Dec. 15, 1972.

Phillip A. Hubbart, Public Defender, and Alan S. Becker, Asst. Public Defender, and William Clay, Legal Intern, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., and Arnold R. Ginsberg, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

Before BARKDULL, C. J., and PEARSON and HAVERFIELD, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Defendant-appellant, Mario Machin, seeks review of a judgment of conviction and sentence based upon a jury verdict finding him guilty of unlawful introduction of contraband into a place of detention.

Defendant was an inmate at the Florida Division of Corrections Road Prison at Big Pine Key in Monroe County. One evening defendant Machin was late in returning to the camp following a family furlough and upon his arrival he was searched by the officers in charge whereupon marijuana was found in his possession. On appeal defendant argues that the information filed charging him with a violation of F.S. § 944.47, F.S.A. was legally insufficient because the Big Pine Key Road Camp was not identified as part of the Florida Division of Corrections.

The purpose of an information is to fairly apprise the defendant of the offense with which he is charged. Drozewski v. State, Fla.1955, 84 So.2d 329. An information should not be dismissed “unless *465the court shall- be of the opinion that the indictment, information, or affidavit is so vague, indistinct and indefinite as to mislead the accused and embarrass him in the preparation of his defense or expose him after conviction or acquittal to substantial danger of a new prosecution for the same offense.” CrPR 3.140(o), 33 F.S.A. The information hereunder review is sufficient under the above requirements to place defendant on notice. He was not misled or embarrassed in the preparation of his defense and he was not exposed to possible double jeopardy. State v. Moss, Fla.App.1968, 206 So.2d 692; State v. Cossack, Fla.App.1967, 205 So.2d 344.

Defendant’s remaining point has been examined and found to be without sufficient merit to demand a reversal.

No reversible error having been made to appear, the judgment and sentence hereunder review are affirmed.

Affirmed.
Exhibit 32.01  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Amended Quarterly Report of DMH International, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q/A for the period ending September 30, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Jon-Marc Garcia, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officercertify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.   /s/ Jon-Marc Garcia By: Jon-Marc Garcia Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer  Dated: May 11, 2012     A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
##### 



Exhibit 31.1 Certification Required by Rule 13a-14(a)
or Rule 15d-14(a) I, Ron Hooper, certify that:  1.
    I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Dominion Resources Black Warrior Trust,
for which Bank of America, N.A., acts as Trustee;2.
    Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this annual report;3.
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
distributable income and changes in trust corpus of the registrant as of, and for, the periods
presented in this annual report;4.
    I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)), or for causing such
controls and procedures to be established and maintained, for the registrant and I have: a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under my supervision, to ensure that material information relating
to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to me by others
within those entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report is being
prepared; b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this annual report my conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure
controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such
evaluation; and c) disclosed in this annual report any change in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the
registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control
over financial reporting;  5.
    I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the registrants auditors:




---



##### 



a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have
a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting. In giving the certifications in paragraphs 4 and 5 above, I have relied to the extent I
consider reasonable on information provided to me by Dominion Black Warrior Basin, Inc. Date: March 16, 2005 By:
    /s/ Ron E. HooperRon E. HooperSenior Vice President and Administrator
Bank of America, N.A.
#### Leo J. GOLUB, Appellant, v. Rebecca N. GOLUB, Appellee.

No. 74-124.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

March 13, 1974.

Appeal dismissed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                             5
<MULTIPLIER>                          1000
<CURRENCY>                            USD

<S>                                   <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                         12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                     MAR-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                        APR-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                          MAR-31-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                       1
<CASH>                                7,799
<SECURITIES>                          0
<RECEIVABLES>                         23,525
<ALLOWANCES>                          (1,020)
<INVENTORY>                           32,594
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                      68,720
<PP&E>                                35,148
<DEPRECIATION>                        (22,583)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                        95,618
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                 17,591
<BONDS>                               0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                 0
<PREFERRED>                           0
<COMMON>                              329
<OTHER-SE>                            58,135
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>          95,618
<SALES>                               141,918
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                      141,918
<CGS>                                 85,537
<TOTAL-COSTS>                         134,736
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                      507
<LOSS-PROVISION>                      0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                    1,090
<INCOME-PRETAX>                       5,585
<INCOME-TAX>                          2,117
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                   3,468
<DISCONTINUED>                        0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                       0
<CHANGES>                             0
<NET-INCOME>                          3,468
<EPS-BASIC>                         0.55
<EPS-DILUTED>                         0.51



</TABLE>
<PAGE>




 
                                 EXHIBIT 23
                                 ----------

                     Consent of Independent Accountants





























<PAGE>

                                                                      Exhibit 23

Consent of Independent Accountants

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement of
Delmarva Power & Light Company on Form S-3 (File No. 333-24059), and the
Registration Statements of Conectiv on Form S-3 (File Nos. 333-72251 and 333-
44219) and Form S-8 (File No. 333-50063), of our report dated February 5, 1999,
on our audits of the consolidated financial statements of Delmarva Power & Light
Company as of December 31, 1998 and 1997 and for each of the three years in the
period ended December 31, 1998, which report is included in this Form 10-K.



/s/ Pricewaterhouse Coopers LLP
-------------------------------
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
March 26, 1999
#### Wilhelmine Reppstein, Plaintiff in Error, *vs.*St. Louis Mutual Insurance Company, Defendant in Error.

1. *Guardians*— Appointment, *order of-*— Recital *of names of minors.*— In the order of the Probate Court appointing A. the guardian of the minor children of B., it is not necessary to set out the names of the children. Such recital serves only as a means of identification.

*Error to Gasconade-Circuit Court.*

*Lay*and Belch, for Plaintiff in Error.

*Cline, Jameson*& *Day,*for Defendant in Error.

Ewing, Judge,

delivered the opinion of the court.

This is an action on the life policy of Gottlieb Reppstein, deceased, by the minor children of said Reppstein, by their guardian, the widow of said deceased.

On the trial, the plaintiffs offered to read in evidence the record of the Probate County of Gasconade County appointing Wilhelmine Reppstein guardian of the persons and 'curator of the estate of said minors, and also offered in evidence the bond of said Wilhelmina as such guardian.

The evidence was objected to by the defendant, and excluded by the court, on the ground that the record was not competent proof of the appointment of said Wilhelmine and that the bond was no part of the record.

*482Plaintiff thereupon took a non-suit, a motion to set aside which being overruled, they excepted and bring the cause here by writ of error. The defect in the record, which it is claimed renders it inadmissible as evidence of the appointment, is the omission of the names of the minor children." They are referred to as the *“*minor heirs, ” of 'Gottlieb Reppstein, with the further recital in the order that her bond in a sum named with certain persons as sureties, giving, their names, “is by the court examined and approved.” The bond, which appears to have been approved the same day, sets forth the names of the minors, and refers in appropriate terms to the order of appointment, and the bond seems to have been duly recorded.

It is probable that such orders usually contain the names of the wards, but is this essential to the validity of the appointment ?

The only purpose it answers, is the means of identification, and if this object can be attained, though not so readily perhaps, by a more general description, this particularity becomes unessential, and a reference to the minors by name may be dispensed with. The terms of the order are sufficiently definite for this purpose.

There can be no difficulty in identifying the “ minor heirs, ” mentioned in the order as the minor children of the deceased for whom the guardian was appointed. Moreover, the bond of the guardian, the approval which is recited in the order making the appointment, sets out the names of all the minor children.

The evidence was improperly excluded.

The judgment of the Circuit Court is reversed and the cause remanded.

The other Judges concur.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Neal Fauntleroy, Appellant.

[737 NYS2d 298]

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Suffolk County (Gazzillo, J.), rendered September 19, 2000, convicting him of attempted criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

We reject the defendant’s contention that he was deprived of the effective assistance of counsel *(see, People v Baldi,*54 NY2d 137). The defendant’s attorney negotiated an advantageous plea agreement that limited the defendant’s exposure to any imprisonment by permitting him the opportunity to complete a drug treatment program *(see, People v Mobley,*221 AD2d 376). In addition, there is no merit to the defendant’s contention that he was not provided with proper written notification of his termination from the drug treatment program *(see,*14 NYCRR 1020.9 [f] [2], [3]). Florio, J.P., S. Miller, Friedmann, Adams and Prudenti, JJ., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Swift Energy
Operating Partners 1995-A, Ltd.'s balance sheet and statement of operations con-
tained in its Form 10-Q for the quarter  ended June 30, 1997 and is qualified in
its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                         349,721
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  138,909
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               496,381
<PP&E>                                         3,544,910
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (877,039)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 3,164,252
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          72,213
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     3,084,869
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   3,164,252
<SALES>                                        335,906
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               356,475
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  635,387<F1>
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (321,549)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (321,549)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (321,549)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0
<FN>
<F1>Includes  lease  operating  expenses,  production  taxes  and  depreciation,
depletion and  amortization  expense.  Excludes general and  administrative  and
interest expense.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

The undersigned, the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer of State Bank Financial Corporation (the “Company”), each certify that, to his knowledge:

 

1.               The quarterly report of the Company for the period ended June 30, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on this date (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.               The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 
|   | /s/   Joseph W. Evans     |
|--------|---------------------------|
|   | Joseph   W. Evans         |
|   | Chief   Executive Officer |
|   | August 15,   2011    |
|   |                      |
|   | /s/   John S. Poelker     |
|   | John   S. Poelker         |
|   | Chief   Financial Officer |
|   | August 15,   2011    |

 

----
#### ILOWITE v. FLORIDA REAL ESTATE COMMISSION.

No. 36910.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Feb. 1968.

Rehearing Denied March 26, 1968.

Certiorari denied without opinion. 203 So.2d 679.
Third District Court of Appeal

State of Florida

Opinion filed March 29, 2023.

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

No. 3D23-154

Lower Tribunal No. F07-39012

________________

Patrick Lively,

Appellant,

vs.

The State of Florida,

Appellee.

An Appeal under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(b)(2) from 

the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Ramiro C. Areces, Judge.

Patrick Lively, in proper person.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, for appellee.

Before LOGUE, MILLER and BOKOR, JJ. 

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
251 La. 676

#### In re STATE in the Interest of the minor Johnny NOEL, Jr.

No. 49041.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Jan. 11, 1968.

In re: Johnny Noel, Jr. applying for writ of habeas corpus.

Writ refused. Applicant has not made a sufficient showing to warrant the exercise of this Court’s original or supervisory jurisdiction.
Exhibit 23.1



Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm



The Board of Directors

Devcon International
Corp.:



We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration
statements listed below of Devcon International Corp. and subsidiaries of our report dated April 14, 2005, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of Devcon International Corp. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2004 and 2003, and the
related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders equity and comprehensive (loss) income, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2004, which report appears in the December 31, 2004 annual
report on Form 10-K of Devcon International Corp. and subsidiaries.



| |  | Forms S-8 (Registration No. 33-32968, No. 33-59557 and No. 333-92231)
|- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  | Forms S-3 (Registration No. 333-119158)
|- |  | ---------------------------------------



/s/ KPMG LLP



Fort Lauderdale, Florida

April 14, 2005