alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2017366EN.01016401.xml

| 27.10.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 366/164 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.10.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 366/164

---

P8_TA(2015)0399

Accession to the Extended Commission of the Convention for the Conservation of Southern Bluefin Tuna ***

European Parliament legislative resolution of 24 November 2015 on the draft Council decision on the conclusion, on behalf of the European Union, of the Agreement in the form of an Exchange of Letters between the European Union and the Commission for the Conservation of Southern Bluefin Tuna (CCSBT) concerning the membership of the Union in the Extended Commission of the Convention for the Conservation of Southern Bluefin Tuna (07134/2015 — C8-0323/2015 — 2015/0036(NLE))

(Consent)

(2017/C 366/22)

The European Parliament,

The European Parliament

| — | having regard to the draft Council decision (07134/2015), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the draft Council decision (07134/2015),

| — | having regard to the Exchange of Letters to obtain membership of the Extended Commission of the Convention for the Conservation of Southern Bluefin Tuna, |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the Exchange of Letters to obtain membership of the Extended Commission of the Convention for the Conservation of Southern Bluefin Tuna,

| — | having regard to the request for consent submitted by the Council in accordance with Article 43(2) and Article 218(6), second subparagraph, point (a), of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (C8-0323/2015), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the request for consent submitted by the Council in accordance with Article 43(2) and Article 218(6), second subparagraph, point (a), of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (C8-0323/2015),

| — | having regard to Rule 99(1), first and third subparagraphs, Rule 99(2), and Rule 108(7) of its Rules of Procedure, |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to Rule 99(1), first and third subparagraphs, Rule 99(2), and Rule 108(7) of its Rules of Procedure,

| — | having regard to the recommendation of the Committee on Fisheries (A8-0318/2015), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the recommendation of the Committee on Fisheries (A8-0318/2015),

| 1. | Gives its consent to the conclusion of the Agreement; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Gives its consent to the conclusion of the Agreement;

| 2. | Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council, the Commission and the governments and parliaments of the Member States and the Commission for the Conservation of Southern Bluefin Tuna. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council, the Commission and the governments and parliaments of the Member States and the Commission for the Conservation of Southern Bluefin Tuna.

---
csgs-ex1053a_6.htm



Exhibit 10.53A

AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT

 

This Amendment No. 1 to Employment Agreement is made and entered into on the 17th day of November, 2016, among CSG SYSTEMS INTERNATIONAL, INC. ("CSGS"), a Delaware corporation, CSG SYSTEMS, INC. ("Systems"), a Delaware corporation, and KENNETH KENNEDY (the "Executive").  CSGS and Systems collectively are referred to in this Amendment No. 1 Employment Agreement as the "Companies". 

 

*  *  *

 

WHEREAS, the Companies and the Executive entered into an Employment Agreement dated March 1, 2016 (the "Employment Agreement"); and 

 

WHEREAS, the Companies and the Executive desire to amend the Employment Agreement as set forth in this Amendment No. 1; 

 

NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing recitals and the agreements of the parties contained in this document, the Companies and the Executive agree as follows: 

 

1.Effective immediately, clause (iii) of subparagraph (e) of Paragraph 10 of the Employment Agreement is amended in its entirety so as to read as follows: 

 


	
 
	
"(iii)
	
An amount equal to three (3) times the sum of (1) the Executive's Base Salary for the calendar year in which the Termination Date occurs plus (2) the performance-based cash bonus which the Executive would receive for the calendar year in which the Termination Date occurs if the Companies attained 100% of their performance goals for such calendar year, reduced as necessary so that the actual amount, if any, payable under this clause (iii) plus the applicable amounts of any other relevant payments or benefits under this subparagraph (e) is $1.00 less than the amount which would result in the imposition of a tax under Section 4999 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the "Code"), on "excess parachute payments" (as defined in Section 280G of the Code), such amount to be paid in a lump sum by the Companies to the Executive no later than thirty (30) days after the determination of such amount;".  
	
 




 

2.As amended by this Amendment No. 1 to Employment Agreement, the Employment Agreement will remain in full force and effect according to its terms. 

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, each of the parties has caused this Amendment No. 1 to Employment Agreement to be executed as of the date first set forth above. 

 


		
	
CSG SYSTEMS INTERNATIONAL, INC., 
	
 

	
a Delaware corporation 
	
 

	
 
	
 

	
By: /s/ Bret C. Griess
	
/s/ Kenneth Kennedy

	
Bret C. Griess, Chief Executive Officer
	
Kenneth Kennedy

	
 
	
 

	
CSG SYSTEMS, INC., a Delaware corporation
	
 

	
 
	
 

	
By: /s/ Bret C. Griess
	
 

	
Bret C. Griess, Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 32.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Protect Pharmaceutical Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Keith M Elison, Chief Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)           The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)            The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





/s/ Keith M ElisonKeith M ElisonChief Financial Officer

Chief Accounting OfficerMay 13, 2011





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.  The foregoing certifications are accompanying the Company's Form 10-Q solely pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Form 10-Q or as a separate disclosure document.
#### Emery FORTNER, Admr. of Estate of Arvie Fortner, Deceased, v. SOUTHERN BELL TEL. & TEL. CO., a Corp., et al.

No. 44257.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

Jan. 30, 1967.

Suggestion of Error Overruled Feb. 27, 1967.

Blass & Smith, Wiggins, W. T. Bailey, Lucedale, Holleman & Plurlbert, Gulfport, for appellant.

Frank J. Plammond, Jr., Moss Point, Mize, Thompson & Mize, Rae Bryant and Thomas L. Stennis, II, Gulfport, Daniel, Coker & Horton and Ruby B. Weeks, Jackson, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

.Affirmed.
#### Nick STEWART, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 70-1165.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

May 11, 1971.

*772Phillip A. Hubbart, Public Defender, and Alan S. Becker, Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., and Alan M. Medof, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

Before PEARSON, C. J., and CHARLES CARROLL and SWANN, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

The appellant was tried before the court and convicted of the offense of robbery. On appeal he argued the trial court committed error by refusing to exclude the testimony of the victim, the principal witness for the state. The ground for seeking to exclude such testimony was that the witness had failed to appear prior to trial for a deposition which had been sought by the defendant, for which the witness had been subpoenaed.

When the case was called for trial the defendant’s attorney informed the court of this situation, and announced he was ready to proceed only if the testimony of such witness would be excluded. Thereupon the court recessed the cause to afford defendant’s attorney time to interview the witness. At the conclusion of the recess period, and in response to a question from the court the defendant’s attorney announced he was ready to proceed.

Appellant’s brief makes reference to the case of Ramirez v. State, Fla.App.1970, 241 So.2d 744, wherein it was held that refusal of the trial court to exclude the testimony of a non-listed witness is error only if it is shown to have prejudiced the defendant in preparation for trial. Appellant contends that the refusal of the court to exclude the testimony of the victim in this case was prejudicial without showing in what respect it so operated. We agree with the position of the state that the record fails to disclose such prejudice. Compare Richardson v. State, Fla.1971, 246 So.2d 771. No reversible error having been shown, the judgment is affirmed.
# C_2014188EN.01001601.xml

| 20.6.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 188/16 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.6.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 188/16

---

Information communicated by Member States regarding closure of fisheries

(2014/C 188/05)

In accordance with Article 35(3) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1224/2009 of 20 November 2009 establishing a Community control system for ensuring compliance with the rules of the common fisheries policy (1), a decision has been taken to close the fishery as set down in the following table:

1

| Date and time of closure | 22.5.2014 |
| --- | --- |
| Duration | 22.5.2014 - 31.12.2014 |
| Member State | Denmark |
| Stock or Group of stocks | SAN/234_2 |
| Species | Sandeel (Ammodytes spp.) |
| Zone | Union waters of sandeel management area 2 |
| Type(s) of fishing vessels | — |
| Reference number | 06/TQ43 |

Date and time of closure

22.5.2014

Duration

22.5.2014 - 31.12.2014

Member State

Denmark

Stock or Group of stocks

SAN/234_2

Species

Sandeel (Ammodytes spp.)

Ammodytes spp.

Zone

Union waters of sandeel management area 2

Type(s) of fishing vessels

—

Reference number

06/TQ43

---

(1)  OJ L 343, 22.12.2009, p. 1.

1

---
!"

#
!
 
   
  $


 






""
%

!


&


'&(


()*+,

$


"!


(






#


-
   
"
  .

  $(/







& $  

  

 
 -
 

 




(


!
 
&


*+0

1  
 


(     


   
  

 ."









" 



/
"
2
"
  
  

 
 "   



/





  






  
   
 
   
  
 -
 "
 
 
  
 (      
 ! 

 
  
 

 ( 

  
 
 


  
"

3 1

 


-
(!


" 


 



 

   
 "

 
 


( /
"
 

" 
3(

   4
 

 
  
 3(
    
   

 "
 !
  
 
   
"
 


 



&.


,

5(&200(1'(' )25 )8//

3XUVXDQW WR 6L[WK &LUF

(/(&7521,& &,7$7,21  )

)LOH 1DPH D

	

	

.56$7819$

;;;;;;;;;;;;

#$0$'28

0$'28



	

100,*5$7,21 $1'

$785$/,=$7,21

8(59,&(

	

5=
 6
!
 

1

+>	



@*
,

A

.
@8


3
 
@*57835BB8#

;;;;;;;;;;;;


	

	  3 8 $&=

  * 7 8
 :*:8127 21C1D A1C1815 6


35  =

  * 7 
	 	
 	


$PDGRX SURGXFHG D GRFXPHQW KH FODLPHG WR EH KLV ELUWK FHUWLILFDWH

IURP 0DXULWDQLD EXW WKH GRFXPHQW ZDV QRW DXWKHQWLFDWHG RU WUDQVODWHG LQWKH UHFRUG


 :8 A7=6#7 5. *:8127 21C1DA1C18154A2 6











$17D 6 *578 2 *
  =



#  

 
 3   1
(
   
!

1
(
3

 
-
 
"
"

 






 

"!

F

 
  
-
  

  
 
    
"







.

 



3(
 






",>?"
F
 

#$




:
8
*
,,



'&2!

5,?,>

"


G 	
,HIH,IHI   
 1   :82G,	?,HIH,IHI
 

 



 


!





#>,+


     


 
  7  (!

   .   .  
  4
      
  


	
 









 
-
  "


"

-


  
 
   %8

)  
/
J
 #

J $( 
  
!






  J ( 
"





!

 


J(

 
  8

 " 
  
 ( 

 "
   










&
 
     

" 
 -
(  /
 %KL



%8

)*



 

/

#-
(
   
 
 




!


 
-
(/
(
"

!

 (&    
 

   
   


"



> 	
 	


!


/

BF







&



"

 
=#    
  
 
  
 BF
  !   

 
!

  

 
 
!
   
 
 


BF
 
  
   
 




!





"
  
 BF
 

    
 




!

 






/
 








2"
!
 %KL
   





 
KL) 
  + 4
 
 
  %

 

!
 






""
/

)


(
BF
    
 
 


 BF


!
 


1
"
-

3






"




.

&


 #



 
  

 % 
 
!)*?4
&


     , 
 


 

 %
"
)  
 

 %




(
)%



!
"




)*?









%!
"


)*?
:

-





%K-L


!
 
(&


)*>0D





%KL
(
!"



N
!"

)*>
 

$/


-







%K-L


!
 
(&


)*+0

	
 


    8

 .5
 
 
 


 


2
 &
@%5 



%8



 


"
 
  
  

 

,
 


3
"!

 

"&


"










   




 
8

    
  

 
 
  #   

  

 


   
 &  A&8






:
8
4
&

 
%1(&


)* 
 " 
 
(

"&  
 
  $
 
 
"  
 :
 8
(
!

!      
 






3$

 
 
 "  #$ 8






 
" 
 &
 ( 
3
$

 	
 	


3
  
 
 
  -
 



( 



!
"
  

/
   

 -
 


   
"
  
!


  
 
   
   

!
 

"

F



 
 


 
 

#
-


(      
 -
(
" "





 &

  &     
 
   #   

  
 

   

      


 


"" 



  
-


(  


. 
 -
 
-

 (  

!




"


8

  
 -
 "

 ( %


"
)*	 
%!
 

  
 

   G,0,H IH>I)  %


""

  
B!

 
:
8
)*,

 

 
 -
(   
 3  

1 
  
 3  
 
 
  
-
(!


"  



3

"(

!

"




-
"



 




3  


"
  
""


#" 
 
 
  

   
 
 

  . 
 3  
 
 -
(


 

( !





    
 
    

!

:
8
 !




	
 3 "
/
 
 

!


 
   
 
/
 3(










  
  !
 "


     
/
"
-
   
"
  4
 
!
1
(



+.		?H>2,

4
 
!

  
"

 


	


2	000IH
(

 
   %   

  
!


! 
!

  
 

"
IJ.		H	2,
I1
H>2,0I

    "
 

!
" 

 





 




 


"


/ "
 
  
 



"
BF

!


BF
"


 
7
H"
#### Mrs. Louise Whitfield WILLIS v. Bernel W. WILLIS.

No. 61819.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

March 31, 1978.

In re: Bernel W. Willis applying for cer-tiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit. Parish of Orleans. 355 So.2d 999.

Denied.

SUMMERS and CALOGERO, JJ., would grant.
# C_2013202EN.01000101.xml

| 16.7.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 202/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.7.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 202/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.6955 — KKR/Bidco/South Staffordshire PLC)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2013/C 202/01

On 10 July 2013, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32013M6955. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32013M6955. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.

---
# C_2013373EN.01001902.xml

| 20.12.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 373/19 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.12.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 373/19

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.7044 — Blackstone/Cambourne/Goldman Sachs/Rothesay)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2013/C 373/06

On 29 November 2013, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32013M7044. EUR-Lex is the online access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32013M7044. EUR-Lex is the online access to the European law.

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                           3,426
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  142,517
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,359
<INVENTORY>                                     77,939
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               225,249
<PP&E>                                          46,091
<DEPRECIATION>                                  11,753
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 408,186
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          100,107
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            4,295
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     135,676
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   408,186
<SALES>                                        444,519
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               444,519
<CGS>                                          343,913
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   80,593
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   117
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               7,180
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 12,716
<INCOME-TAX>                                     5,496
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              7,220
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     7,220
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .57
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .56


</TABLE>
**Exhibit 23.1**

**Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

The Board of Directors

Cogo Group, Inc.: 

We consent tothe incorporation by reference in the registration statement (Nos. 333-164699, 333-144326 and 333-125696) on Form S-8 of Cogo Group, Inc. of our reports dated March 16, 2011, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of Cogo Group, Inc.and its subsidiaries as of December 31, 2010 and 2009, and the related consolidated statements of income and comprehensive income, changes in equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2010 andthe effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2010, which reports appear in the December 31, 2010 annual report on Form 10-K of Cogo Group, Inc. and to the reference to our firm under the heading“Selected Financial Data” in the annual report. 

/s/ **KPMG**

Hong Kong, China 

March 16, 2011
EXHIBIT 32.2

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                                  PURSUANT TO
                            18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Jessica Bradshaw, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge,
Guru Health Inc.'s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended February
29, 2012 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that

     (1)  The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.


Date: April 16, 2012                       /s/ Jessica Bradshaw
                                           -------------------------------------
                                    Name:  Jessica Bradshaw
                                    Title: Secretary, Treasurer Chief Financial
                                           Officer, Director
#### Luddie P. WEAVER v. Glenn J. O’BANION et al. Luddie P. WEAVER v. LOUISIANA STATE POLICE DEPT.

No. 62353.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

June 30, 1978.

In re: Luddie P. Weaver applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit. Parish of East Baton Rouge. 359 So.2d 706.

Writ denied.

SUMMERS, TATE and DENNIS, JJ., would grant the writ.
# C_2014453EN.01002701.xml

| 17.12.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 453/27 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.12.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 453/27

---

Commission information notice pursuant to Article 16(4) of Regulation (EC) No 1008/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council on common rules for the operation of air services in the Community

Repeal of public service obligations in respect of scheduled air services

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2014/C 453/14)

| Member State | ITALY |
| --- | --- |
| Routes concerned | Aosta-Rome Fiumicino and vice versa |
| Original date of entry into force of the public service obligations | 29 September 2013 |
| Date of repeal | 18 November 2014 |
| Address where the text and any relevant information and/or documentation relating to the public service obligation can be obtained | Reference document


  OJ C 41, 13.2.2013, p. 3.
  For further information, please contact:





  Ministero delle Infrastrutture e dei Trasporti |
| Direzione Generale per Aeroporti e il Trasporto Aereo |
| Tel. +39 0659084908/4041/4350 |
| Fax +39 0659083280 |
| E-mail: dg.ta@pec.mit.gov.it |
| Internet: http://www.mit.gov.it |

Member State

ITALY

Routes concerned

Aosta-Rome Fiumicino and vice versa

Original date of entry into force of the public service obligations

29 September 2013

Date of repeal

18 November 2014

Address where the text and any relevant information and/or documentation relating to the public service obligation can be obtained

Reference document

Reference document

OJ C 41, 13.2.2013, p. 3.

For further information, please contact:

Ministero delle Infrastrutture e dei Trasporti

Direzione Generale per Aeroporti e il Trasporto Aereo

Tel. +39 0659084908/4041/4350

Fax +39 0659083280

E-mail: dg.ta@pec.mit.gov.it

Internet: http://www.mit.gov.it

---