[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 165 (Friday, August 24, 2018)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 42850-42851]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-18243]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Defense Acquisition Regulations System

48 CFR Part 236

[Docket DARS-2018-0039]
RIN 0750-AJ75


Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement: Exemption From 
Design-Build Selection Procedures (DFARS Case 2018-D011)

AGENCY: Defense Acquisition Regulations System, Department of Defense 
(DoD).

ACTION: Proposed rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: DoD is proposing to amend the Defense Federal Acquisition 
Regulation Supplement to implement a section of the National Defense 
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2018 that allows for more than five 
offerors on solicitations issued using two-phase design-build selection 
procedures for indefinite-delivery, indefinite-quantity contracts that 
exceed $4 million.

DATES: Comments on the proposed rule should be submitted in writing to 
the address shown below on or before October 23, 2018, to be considered 
in the formation of a final rule.

ADDRESSES: Submit comments identified by DFARS Case 2018-D011, using 
any of the following methods:
    [cir] Federal eRulemaking Portal: http://www.regulations.gov. 
Search for ``DFARS Case 2018-D011''. Select ``Submit a Comment Now'' 
and follow the instructions provided to submit a comment. Please 
include ``DFARS Case 2018-D011'' on any attached document.
    [cir] Email: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#9bf4e8ffb5fffdfae9e8dbf6faf2f7b5f6f2f7"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="29465a4d074d4f485b5a694448404507444045">[email protected]</span></a>. Include DFARS Case 2018-D011 in 
the subject line of the message.
    [cir] Fax: 571-372-6094.
    [cir] Mail: Defense Acquisition Regulations System, Attn: Ms. 
Heather Kitchens, OUSD(A&S)DPC/DARS, Room 3B941, 3060 Defense Pentagon, 
Washington, DC 20301-3060.
    Comments received generally will be posted without change to http://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information provided. To 
confirm receipt of your comment(s), please check www.regulations.gov, 
approximately two to three days after submission to verify posting 
(except allow 30 days for posting of comments submitted by mail).

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Heather Kitchens, telephone 571-
372-6104.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Background

    This rule proposes to revise the DFARS to implement section 823 of 
the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2018 (Pub. L. 
115-91). Section 823 amends 10 U.S.C. 2305a to allow for more than the 
maximum number of five offerors when a solicitation is issued using 
two-phase design-build selection procedures for an indefinite-delivery, 
indefinite-quantity (IDIQ) contract that exceeds $4 million.
    Prior to the amendments made by section 823, 10 U.S.C. 2305a 
required the head of the contracting activity to approve the 
contracting officer's justification that it is in the best interest of 
the Government to exceed the maximum number of five offerors that may 
be selected to submit phase-two proposals, if certain conditions apply. 
Section 823 eliminates the requirement for such a justification when 
the solicitation is for an IDIQ contract that exceeds $4 million.

II. Discussion and Analysis

    The two-phase design-build selection procedures authorized by 10 
U.S.C. 2305a are implemented at Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) 
subpart 36.3. The statutory requirement for a contracting officer to 
justify exceeding the maximum number of five offerors is implemented at 
FAR 36.303-1(a)(4). This rule proposes to implement section 823 by 
adding a new DFARS section 236.303-1(a)(4), to be used in lieu of the 
procedures at FAR 36.303-1(a)(4). The new DFARS section implements 10 
U.S.C. 2305a, as amended by section 823, by providing--
    <bullet> The new authority to exceed the five offeror maximum when 
the solicitation is for an IDIQ contract that exceeds $4 million;
    <bullet> The authority to exceed the five offeror maximum when the 
contracting officer's decision is approved by the head of the 
contracting activity when the solicitation is for a contract that 
exceeds $4 million; and
    <bullet> A statement that the number of offerors is at the 
contracting officer's discretion when the solicitation is for a 
contract that does not exceed $4 million.

[[Page 42851]]

III. Applicability to Contracts at or Below the Simplified Acquisition 
Threshold and for Commercial Items, Including Commercially Available 
Off-the-Shelf Items

    This rule does not propose to create any new provisions or clauses 
or impact any existing provisions or clauses.

IV. Executive Orders 12866 and 13563

    Executive Order (E.O.s) 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess 
all costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if 
regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize 
net benefits (including potential economic, environmental, public 
health and safety effects, distributive impacts, and equity). E.O. 
13563 emphasizes the importance of quantifying both costs and benefits, 
of reducing costs, of harmonizing rules, and of promoting flexibility. 
This is not a significant regulatory action and, therefore, was not 
subject to review under section 6(b) of E.O. 12866, Regulatory Planning 
and Review, dated September 30, 1993. This is not a major rule under 5 
U.S.C. 804.

V. Executive Order 13771

    This proposed rule is not expected to be an E.O. 13771, Reducing 
Regulation and Controlling Regulatory Costs, regulatory action, because 
this proposed rule is not significant under E.O. 12866.

VI. Regulatory Flexibility Act

    DoD does not expect this proposed rule to have a significant 
economic impact on a substantial number of small entities within the 
meaning of the Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 601 et seq., 
because the scope of the rule only changes internal Government 
operating procedures for the design-build selection procedures. 
However, an initial regulatory flexibility analysis has been performed 
and is summarized as follows:
    This rule proposes to amend the Defense Federal Acquisition 
Regulation (DFARS) to implement section 823 of the National Defense 
Authorization Act (NDAA) for Fiscal Year (FY) 2018 (Pub. L. 115-91). 
Section 823 amends 10 U.S.C. 2305a to allow contracting officers to 
exceed the maximum number of five offerors for solicitations issued 
using two-phase design-build selection procedures for indefinite-
delivery, indefinite-quantity (IDIQ) contracts that exceed $4 million.
    The objective of this rule is to implement the statutory changes to 
the two-phase design-build selection procedures by adding a new DFARS 
section 236.303-1(a)(4), to be used in lieu of Federal Acquisition 
Regulation 23.303-1(a)(4). The new DFARS section provides--
    <bullet> The new authority to exceed the five offeror maximum when 
the solicitation is for an IDIQ contract that exceeds $4 million;
    <bullet> The authority to exceed the five offeror maximum when the 
contracting officer's decision is approved by the head of the 
contracting activity when the solicitation is for a contract that 
exceeds $4 million; and
    <bullet> A statement that the number of offerors is at the 
contracting officer's discretion when the solicitation is for a 
contract that does not exceed $4 million.
    The legal basis for this rule is section 823 of the NDAA for FY 
2018.
    Based on FY 2017 data from the Federal Procurement Data System, DoD 
issued approximately 499 new awards for construction exceeding $4 
million, to include IDIQ contracts, purchase orders, and orders under 
basic ordering agreements. Of the 499 new awards for construction, 
approximately 305 awards were made to 252 unique small businesses 
entities.
    This proposed rule does not include any new reporting, 
recordkeeping, or other compliance requirements for small entities. 
However, this rule may create additional opportunities for small 
entities, because the rule allows the maximum number of offerors 
selected to submit phase-two proposals to exceed five, when the 
solicitation is for an IDIQ contract valued at greater than $4 million, 
without requiring additional justification or approval.
    The rule does not duplicate, overlap, or conflict with any other 
Federal rules.
    There are no known significant alternative approaches to the 
proposed rule that would meet the requirements of the applicable 
statute.
    DoD invites comments from small business concerns and other 
interested parties on the expected impact of this rule on small 
entities.
    DoD will also consider comments from small entities concerning the 
existing regulations in subparts affected by this rule in accordance 
with 5 U.S.C. 610. Interested parties must submit such comments 
separately and should cite 5 U.S.C. 610 (DFARS Case 2018-D011), in 
correspondence.

VI. Paperwork Reduction Act

    The rule does not contain any information collection requirements 
that require the approval of the Office of Management and Budget under 
the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. chapter 35).

List of Subjects in 48 CFR Part 236

    Government procurement.

Jennifer Lee Hawes,
Regulatory Control Officer, Defense Acquisition Regulations System.

    Therefore, 48 CFR 236 is proposed to be amended as follows:

PART 236--CONSTRUCTION AND ARCHITECT-ENGINEER CONTRACTS

0
1. The authority citation for part 236 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  41 U.S.C. 1303 and 48 CFR chapter 1.

0
2. Add subpart 236.3 to read as follows:
Subpart 236.3--Two-Phase Design-Build Selection Procedures
Sec.
236.303-1 Phase One

Subpart 236.3--Two-Phase Design-Build Selection Procedures


236.303-1  Phase One.

    (4) In lieu of the requirements at FAR 36.303-1(a)(4)--
    (i) If the contract value exceeds $4 million, the maximum number of 
offerors specified in the solicitation that are to be selected to 
submit phase-two proposals shall not exceed five, unless--
    (A) The solicitation is issued for an indefinite-delivery 
indefinite-quantity contract for design-build construction; or
    (B) The head of the contracting activity, delegable to a level no 
lower than the senior contracting official within the contracting 
activity, approves the contracting officer's decision with respect to 
an individual solicitation, that a maximum number greater than five is 
in the best interest of the Government and is consistent with the 
purposes and objectives of the two-phase selection procedures. The 
decision shall be documented in the contract file (10 U.S.C 2305a(d)).
    (ii) If the contract value is at or below $4 million, the maximum 
number of offerors specified in the solicitation that are to be 
selected to submit phase-two proposals is at the discretion of the 
contracting officer.

[FR Doc. 2018-18243 Filed 8-23-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 5001-06ep-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>