Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 31 / Friday, February 14, 2014 / Proposed Rules 8905 

1The other Federal agencies included the Federal 

Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC), the Federal 

Trade Commission (FTC), the National Credit 

Union Administration (NCUA), the Office of the 

Comptroller of the Currency (OCC), the Office of 

Thrift Supervision (OTS), the Securities and 

Exchange Commission (SEC), and the Commodity 

Futures Trading Commission (CFTC). 

2The GLB Act’s privacy provisions are set forth 

in sections 502 and 503. 15 U.S.C. 6802–6803. 

3 12 U.S.C. 5481(14). The Dodd-Frank Act, Public 

Law No. 111–203, 124 Stat. 1376, was signed into 

law on July 21, 2010. 

4The Dodd-Frank Act did not transfer the Board’s 

authority under section 501(b) of the GLB Act to 

establish information security standards for 

financial institutions subject to its jurisdiction. 15 

U.S.C. 6801(b). Therefore, the CFPB does not have 

authority to prescribe regulations for GLBA section 

505 as it applies to section 501(b). 

5 76 FR 79025 (Dec. 21, 2011). 

I. Discussion 

Subtitle A of Title V of the GrammLeach-Bliley Act, 15 U.S.C. 6801–6809, 

titled ‘‘Disclosure of Nonpublic Personal 

Information,’’ limits the circumstances 

in which a financial institution can 

disclose nonpublic personal information 

about a consumer to nonaffiliated third 

parties and requires financial 

institutions to provide certain privacy 

notices to their customers who are 

consumers. Prior to July 21, 2011, 

rulemaking authority under section 504 

of the GLB Act was shared by eight 

Federal agencies, including the Board.1

Each of the agencies issued consistent 

and comparable rules to implement the 

GLB Act’s privacy provisions; 2 the 

Board implemented its rule as 

Regulation P, 12 CFR Part 216. 

Section 1002(14) of the Dodd-Frank 

Act 3 transferred rulemaking authority 

for a number of consumer financial 

protection laws, including the authority 

to prescribe regulations under GLB Act 

section 504(a)(1)(A) as it pertains to 

sections 502 through 509 of the Act.4

This transfer of rulemaking authority 

from the Board and other Federal 

agencies to the Bureau became effective 

on July 21, 2011. In connection with the 

transfer, the Bureau published an 

interim final rule to establish its own 

Regulation P, 12 CFR Part 1016, to 

implement the privacy provisions of the 

GLB Act (Bureau Interim Final Rule).5

The Bureau Interim Final Rule 

substantially duplicates the Board’s 

Regulation P and covers financial 

institutions and other persons for which 

the Bureau has rulemaking authority 

pursuant to section 504(a)(1)(A) of the 

GLB Act. The Bureau Interim Final Rule 

does not impose any new substantive 

obligations on regulated entities. 

The scope of the Board’s Regulation P 

is set forth in § 216.1(b)(1) and states 

that the part applies to state member 

banks, bank holding companies and 

certain of their nonbank subsidiaries or 

affiliates, state uninsured branches and 

agencies of foreign banks, commercial 

lending companies owned or controlled 

by foreign banks, and Edge and 

agreement corporations. As a result, all 

of the entities formerly subject to the 

Board’s rule are covered by the Bureau 

Interim Final Rule. Accordingly, the 

Board is proposing to repeal its 

Regulation P. 

II. Initial Regulatory Flexibility 

Analysis 

The Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 

U.S.C. 601 et seq.) (RFA) generally 

requires an agency to perform an 

assessment of the impact a rule is 

expected to have on small entities. 

Based on its analysis, and for the 

reasons stated below, the Board believes 

that this proposed rule will not have a 

significant economic impact on a 

substantial number of small entities. A 

final regulatory flexibility analysis will 

be conducted after consideration of 

comments received during the public 

comment period. 

1. Statement of the need for, and 

objectives of, the proposed rule. As 

noted above, section 1002(14) of the 

Dodd-Frank Act transferred rulemaking 

authority for a number of consumer 

financial protection laws from the Board 

to the Bureau, effective July 21, 2011, 

including the Board’s rulemaking 

authority under section 504(a)(1)(A) of 

the GLB Act. The Bureau issued the 

Bureau Interim Final Rule to implement 

the privacy provisions of the GLB Act in 

connection with the transfer of this 

rulemaking authority to the Bureau. All 

of the entities formerly subject to the 

Board’s Regulation P are covered by the 

Bureau Interim Final Rule. 

Consequently, the Board’s proposal to 

repeal the Board’s Regulation P, 12 CFR 

Part 216, will not have any effect on 

entities that were formerly subject to the 

Board’s rule. 

2. Small entities affected by the 

proposed rule. The proposed rule would 

repeal the Board’s Regulation P, 12 CFR 

Part 216, because the Board no longer 

has rulewriting authority for the 

provisions of the GLB Act that were 

implemented in this regulation. All of 

the entities previously subject to the 

Board’s Regulation P are now subject to 

the Bureau’s Regulation P. 

Consequently, the proposed repeal 

would not affect any entity, including 

any small entity. 

3. Recordkeeping, reporting, and 

compliance requirements. The proposed 

rule would repeal the Board’s 

Regulation P, 12 CFR Part 216, and 

would therefore not impose any 

recordkeeping, reporting, or compliance 

requirements on any entities. Existing 

requirements remain the same under the 

Bureau’s Regulation P. 

4. Other federal rules. The Board is 

proposing to repeal its Regulation P (12 

CFR Part 216) because of the Bureau’s 

overlapping Regulation P (12 CFR Part 

1016). 

5. Significant alternatives to the 

proposed revisions. Because the repeal 

of the Board’s Regulation P (12 CFR Part 

216) will have no impact, there are no 

significant alternatives that would 

further minimize the economic impact 

of the proposed rule on small entities. 

III. Paperwork Reduction Act 

In accordance with the Paperwork 

Reduction Act (PRA) of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 

3506; 5 CFR 1320 Appendix A.1), the 

Board reviewed the rule under the 

authority delegated to the Federal 

Reserve by the Office of Management 

and Budget (OMB). The proposed rule 

contains no requirements subject to the 

PRA. 

List of Subjects in 12 CFR Part 216 

Banks, banking, Consumer protection, 

Foreign banking, Holding companies, 

Privacy, Reporting and recordkeeping 

requirements. 

Authority and Issuance 

For the reasons set forth in the 

preamble, under 15 U.S.C. 6801 et seq, 

the Board proposes to amend Regulation 

P, 12 CFR Part 216, and the Official Staff 

Commentary, as set forth below: 

PART 216—PRIVACY OF CONSUMER 

FINANCIAL INFORMATION 

(REGULATION P) 

■ 1. Part 216 is removed and reserved. 

By order of the Board of Governors of the 

Federal Reserve System, February 10, 2014. 

Robert deV. Frierson, 

Secretary of the Board. 

[FR Doc. 2014–03267 Filed 2–13–14; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6210–01–P 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

Federal Aviation Administration 

14 CFR Part 39 

[Docket No. FAA–2013–0882; Directorate 

Identifier 2013–NE–29–AD] 

RIN 2120–AA64 

Airworthiness Directives; Rolls-Royce 

Deutschland Ltd & Co KG Turbofan 

Engines 

AGENCY: Federal Aviation 

Administration (FAA), DOT. 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
8906 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 31 / Friday, February 14, 2014 / Proposed Rules 

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking 

(NPRM). 

SUMMARY: We propose to adopt a new 

airworthiness directive (AD) for all 

Rolls-Royce Deutschland Ltd & Co KG 

(RRD) BR700–725A1–12 turbofan 

engines. This proposed AD was 

prompted by reports of wear on the 

receptors of the double-ended unions in 

the fuel metering unit (FMU) housing on 

BR700–725A1–12 engines causing fuel 

leakage. This proposed AD would 

require removal of the affected FMUs. 

We are proposing this AD to prevent 

failure of the FMU, which could lead to 

damage to one or more engines and 

damage to the airplane. 

DATES: We must receive comments on 

this proposed AD by April 15, 2014. 

ADDRESSES: You may send comments by 

any of the following methods: 

• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to 

http://www.regulations.gov and follow 

the instructions for sending your 

comments electronically. 

• Mail: Docket Management Facility, 

U.S. Department of Transportation, 1200 

New Jersey Avenue SE., West Building 

Ground Floor, Room W12–140, 

Washington, DC 20590–0001. 

• Hand Delivery: Deliver to Mail 

address above between 9 a.m. and 5 

p.m., Monday through Friday, except 

Federal holidays. 

• Fax: 202–493–2251. 

For service information identified in 

this AD, contact Rolls-Royce 

Deutschland Ltd & Co KG, Eschenweg 

11, Dahlewitz, 15827 BlankenfeldeMahlow, Germany; phone: 49 0 33– 

7086–1883; fax: 49 0 33–7086–3276. 

You may view this service information 

at the FAA, Engine & Propeller 

Directorate, 12 New England Executive 

Park, Burlington, MA 01803. For 

information on the availability of this 

material at the FAA, call 781–238–7125. 

Examining the AD Docket 

You may examine the AD docket on 

the Internet at http://

www.regulations.gov by searching for 

and locating Docket No. FAA–2013– 

0882; or in person at the Docket 

Operations office between 9 a.m. and 5 

p.m., Monday through Friday, except 

Federal holidays. The AD docket 

contains this proposed AD, the 

mandatory continuing airworthiness 

information (MCAI), the regulatory 

evaluation, any comments received, and 

other information. The street address for 

the Docket Operations office (phone: 

800–647–5527) is the same as the Mail 

address provided in the ADDRESSES

section. Comments will be available in 

the AD docket shortly after receipt. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Glorianne Niebuhr, Aerospace Engineer, 

Engine Certification Office, FAA, Engine 

& Propeller Directorate, 12 New England 

Executive Park, Burlington, MA 01803; 

phone: 781–238–7132; fax: 781–238– 

7199; email: glorianne.neibuhr@faa.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Comments Invited 

We invite you to send any written 

relevant data, views, or arguments about 

this proposed AD. Send your comments 

to an address listed under the 

ADDRESSES section. Include ‘‘Docket No. 

FAA–2013–0882; Directorate Identifier 

2013–NE–29–AD’’ at the beginning of 

your comments. We specifically invite 

comments on the overall regulatory, 

economic, environmental, and energy 

aspects of this proposed AD. We will 

consider all comments received by the 

closing date and may amend this 

proposed AD based on those comments. 

We will post all comments we 

receive, without change, to http://

www.regulations.gov, including any 

personal information you provide. We 

will also post a report summarizing each 

substantive verbal contact with FAA 

personnel concerning this proposed AD. 

Using the search function of the Web 

site, anyone can find and read the 

comments in any of our dockets, 

including, if provided, the name of the 

individual who sent the comment (or 

signed the comment on behalf of an 

association, business, labor union, etc.). 

You may review the DOT’s complete 

Privacy Act Statement in the Federal 

Register published on April 11, 2000 

(65 FR 19477–78). 

Discussion 

The European Aviation Safety Agency 

(EASA), which is the Technical Agent 

for the Member States of the European 

Community, has issued EASA AD 2013– 

0229R1, dated November 21, 2013 

(referred to hereinafter as ‘‘the MCAI’’), 

to correct an unsafe condition for the 

specified products. The MCAI states: 

Occurrences have been reported of finding 

wear on the receptors of the double-ended 

unions in the Fuel Metering Unit (FMU) 

housing on BR700–725A1–12 engines. 

This condition, if not corrected, could lead 

to fuel leak resulting in engine in-flight 

shutdown and consequent reduced control of 

the aeroplane. 

Failure of the FMU due to these 

conditions will result in loss of thrust 

control and damage to the engine. You 

may examine the MCAI in the AD 

docket on the Internet at http://

www.regulations.gov by searching for 

and locating it in Docket No. FAA– 

2013–0882. 

FAA’s Determination and Requirements 

of This Proposed AD 

This product has been approved by 

the aviation authority of Germany, and 

is approved for operation in the United 

States. Pursuant to our bilateral 

agreement with the European 

Community, EASA has notified us of 

the unsafe condition described in the 

MCAI and service information 

referenced above. We are proposing this 

AD because we evaluated all 

information provided by EASA and 

determined the unsafe condition exists 

and is likely to exist or develop on other 

products of the same type design. This 

proposed AD would require removal of 

the affected FMUs and their 

replacement with a part eligible for 

installation. 

Costs of Compliance 

We estimate that this proposed AD 

affects 24 RRD turbofan engines 

installed on aircraft of U.S. registry. We 

also estimate that it would take about 6 

hours per engine to comply with this 

proposed AD. The average labor rate is 

$85 per hour. Required parts cost about 

$293,960 per engine. Based on these 

figures, we estimate the cost of this 

proposed AD on U.S. operators to be 

$7,067,280. 

Authority for This Rulemaking 

Title 49 of the United States Code 

specifies the FAA’s authority to issue 

rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, 

section 106, describes the authority of 

the FAA Administrator. ‘‘Subtitle VII: 

Aviation Programs,’’ describes in more 

detail the scope of the Agency’s 

authority. 

We are issuing this rulemaking under 

the authority described in ‘‘Subtitle VII, 

Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: 

General requirements.’’ Under that 

section, Congress charges the FAA with 

promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in 

air commerce by prescribing regulations 

for practices, methods, and procedures 

the Administrator finds necessary for 

safety in air commerce. This proposed 

regulation is within the scope of that 

authority because it addresses an unsafe 

condition that is likely to exist or 

develop on products identified in this 

rulemaking action. 

Regulatory Findings 

We determined that this proposed AD 

would not have federalism implications 

under Executive Order 13132. This 

proposed AD would not have a 

substantial direct effect on the States, on 

the relationship between the national 

Government and the States, or on the 

distribution of power and 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 31 / Friday, February 14, 2014 / Proposed Rules 8907 

responsibilities among the various 

levels of government. 

For the reasons discussed above, I 

certify this proposed regulation: 

(1) Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory 

action’’ under Executive Order 12866, 

(2) Is not a ‘‘significant rule’’ under 

the DOT Regulatory Policies and 

Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 

1979), 

(3) Will not affect intrastate aviation 

in Alaska to the extent that it justifies 

making a regulatory distinction, and 

(4) Will not have a significant 

economic impact, positive or negative, 

on a substantial number of small entities 

under the criteria of the Regulatory 

Flexibility Act. 

We prepared a regulatory evaluation 

of the estimated costs to comply with 

this proposed AD and placed it in the 

AD docket. 

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39 

Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation 

safety, Incorporation by reference, 

Safety. 

The Proposed Amendment 

Accordingly, under the authority 

delegated to me by the Administrator, 

the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 

39 as follows: 

PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS 

DIRECTIVES 

■ 1. The authority citation for part 39 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701. 

§ 39.13 [Amended] 

■ 2. The FAA amends § 39.13 by adding 

the following new airworthiness 

directive (AD): 

Rolls-Royce Deutschland Ltd & Co KG: 

Docket No. FAA–2013–0882; Directorate 

Identifier 2013–NE–29–AD. 

(a) Comments Due Date 

We must receive comments by April 15, 

2014. 

(b) Affected ADs 

None. 

(c) Applicability 

This AD applies to all Rolls-Royce 

Deutschland Ltd & Co KG (RRD) BR700– 

725A1–12 turbofan engines. 

(d) Reason 

This AD was prompted by reports of wear 

on the receptors of the double-ended unions 

in the fuel metering unit (FMU) housing on 

BR700–725A1–12 engines causing fuel 

leakage. We are issuing this AD to prevent 

failure of the FMU, which could lead to 

damage to one or more engines, and damage 

to the airplane. 

(e) Actions and Compliance 

Comply with this AD within the 

compliance times specified, unless already 

done. 

(1) After the effective date of this AD, 

before the FMU has accumulated 650 flight 

hours (FHs) since new, or within 30 days, 

whichever occurs later, remove FMU part 

number (P/N) G3000FMU02 or P/N 

G3000FMU03, and replace it with a part 

eligible for installation. 

(2) Thereafter, remove the FMU at intervals 

not to exceed 650 FHs and replace it with a 

part eligible for installation. 

(f) Installation Prohibition 

After the effective date of this AD, do not 

install FMU P/N G3000FMU02 onto any 

engine, or install any engine with FMU P/N 

G3000FMU02 onto any airplane. 

(g) Definition 

For the purpose of this AD, an FMU 

eligible for installation is a new FMU or an 

FMU with P/N G3000FMU03 that has 

accumulated fewer than 650 FHs since 

installation on any airplane or since last 

repair using RRD Alert Non-Modification 

Service Bulletin (NMSB) No. ALERT SB– 

BR700–73–A900309, Revision 1, dated 

November 8, 2013. 

(h) Alternative Methods of Compliance 

(AMOCs) 

The Manager, Engine Certification Office, 

may approve AMOCs for this AD. Use the 

procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19 to make 

your request. 

(i) Related Information 

(1) For more information about this AD, 

contact Glorianne Niebuhr, Aerospace 

Engineer, Engine Certification Office, FAA, 

Engine & Propeller Directorate, 12 New 

England Executive Park, Burlington, MA 

01803; phone: 781–238–7132; fax: 781–238– 

7199; email: glorianne.niebuhr@faa.gov. 

(2) Refer to MCAI European Aviation 

Safety Agency AD 2013–0229R1, dated 

November 21, 2013. You may examine the 

MCAI in the AD docket on the Internet at 

http://www.regulations.gov by searching for 

and locating it in Docket No. FAA–2013– 

0882. 

(3) RRD Alert NMSB No. ALERT SB– 

BR700–73–A900309, Revision 1, dated 

November 8, 2013, which is not incorporated 

by reference in this AD, can be obtained from 

RRD, using the contact information in 

paragraph (i)(4) of this AD. 

(4) For service information identified in 

this AD, contact Rolls-Royce Deutschland Ltd 

& Co KG, Eschenweg 11, Dahlewitz, 15827 

Blankenfelde-Mahlow, Germany; phone: 49 0 

33–7086–1944; fax: 49 0 33–7086–3276. 

(5) You may view this service information 

at the FAA, Engine & Propeller Directorate, 

12 New England Executive Park, Burlington, 

MA. For information on the availability of 

this material at the FAA, call 781–238–7125. 

Issued in Burlington, Massachusetts, on 

February 6, 2014. 

Colleen M. D’Alessandro, 

Assistant Directorate Manager, Engine & 

Propeller Directorate, Aircraft Certification 

Service. 

[FR Doc. 2014–03252 Filed 2–13–14; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910–13–P 

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND 

HUMAN SERVICES 

Food and Drug Administration 

21 CFR Part 1 

[Docket No. FDA–2013–N–0013] 

Sanitary Transportation of Human and 

Animal Food; Public Meetings on 

Proposed Rule 

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, 

HHS. 

ACTION: Notification of public meetings. 

SUMMARY: The Food and Drug 

Administration (FDA or we) is 

announcing three public meetings to 

discuss the proposed rule that would 

establish requirements for shippers, 

carriers by motor vehicle and rail 

vehicle, and receivers engaged in the 

transportation of food, including food 

for animals, to use sanitary 

transportation practices to help ensure 

the safety of the food they transport. The 

proposed rule is part of our larger effort 

to focus on prevention of food safety 

problems throughout the food chain and 

is part of our implementation of the 

Sanitary Food Transportation Act of 

2005 (2005 SFTA) and the FDA Food 

Safety Modernization Act (FSMA). The 

purpose of the public meetings is to 

inform the public of the provisions of 

the proposed rule and the rulemaking 

process (including how to submit 

comments, data, and other information 

to the rulemaking docket) as well as 

solicit oral stakeholder and public 

comments on the proposed rule and to 

respond to questions about the rule. 

DATES: See section II, ‘‘How to 

Participate in the Public Meetings,’’ in 

the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section 

for dates and times of the public 

meetings, closing dates for advance 

registration, and information on 

deadlines for submitting either 

electronic or written comments to FDA’s 

Division of Dockets Management. 

ADDRESSES: See section II, ‘‘How to 

Participate in the Public Meetings,’’ in 

the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For 

questions about registering for the 

meeting, to register by phone, or to 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS