alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>   1

Exhibit 15

Awareness of PricewaterhouseCoopers

August 13, 1999

Securities and Exchange Commission
450 Fifth Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20549

Commissioners:

We are aware that our report dated July 23, 1999 on our review of interim
financial information of Pharmacia & Upjohn, Inc., (the "Company") for the three
and six-month periods ended June 30, 1999 and included in the Company's
quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter then ended is incorporated by
reference in the Company's Form S-8 Registration Statement (No. 333-74783) dated
March 22, 1999, (No. 333-74785) dated March 22, 1999, (No. 333-76659) dated
April 20, 1999, (No. 333-76657) dated April 20, 1999, and (No. 333-03109) dated
May 3, 1996, and in the Company's Form S-3 Registration Statement (No.
333-82723) dated July 23, 1999 and in the Company's Form S-4 Registration
Statement (No. 333-84253) dated August 2, 1999.

Very truly yours,



PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP










                                       26
Exhibit 32.1  SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION  In connection with the quarterly report of Big Clix, Corp. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q /A Amendment No. 1 for the period ended March 31, 2013 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Patrick Yore, President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. SS. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.  August 14 , 2013  /s/ Patrick Yore Patrick Yore, President, Principal Executive Officer, Principal Financial and Accounting officer  A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

JUDGMENT

No. 04

- 14

- 00639

- CV

In the Interest of L.A. , A.W., A.W., A.W., E.W., and A.W., C hildren

From the 224th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2013

- PA

- 01513

Honorable Charles E. Montemayor, Associate Judge Presiding

BEFORE JUSTICE ANGELINI

, JUSTICE MARTINEZ , AND JUSTICE CHAPA

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the trial court’s Order of Termination

is AFFIRMED as to M.S.W., the only party that appealed.

I t is ORDERED that no costs shall be assessed against appellant, M.S.W., because she is

indigent.

SIGNED December 31, 2014.

_____________________________ Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice
#### Robert “Bobby” FOLSOM, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 71-645.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Feb. 16, 1973.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS

<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                             DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                                JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                                  DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                                              876,368
<SECURITIES>                                                        125,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                                       18,913,836
<ALLOWANCES>                                                        (4,984,839)
<INVENTORY>                                                         4,779,121
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                                    27,895,994
<PP&E>                                                              66,767,866
<DEPRECIATION>                                                      (27,119,417)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                      86,433,260
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                               19,183,305
<BONDS>                                                             0
<COMMON>                                                            449,894
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                               0
<PREFERRED>                                                         0
<OTHER-SE>                                                          12,064,133
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                        86,433,260
<SALES>                                                             64,243,751
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                                    64,243,751
<CGS>                                                               53,678,713
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                       0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                    22,975,774
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                    150,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                                  2,668,277
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                                     (15,229,013)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                        307,010
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                                 (15,536,023)
<DISCONTINUED>                                                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                     0
<CHANGES>                                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                                        (15,536,023)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                       (3.45)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                       (3.45)



</TABLE>
## J-C\,(r\**wr\,~~ -~:)**  

### tekler -1-o C 0 1Ylf'fc4fl 

### ot**~vert. hcvrct.S.>~:tcv'"l"'**  (lee-e.'**(./j~** fyoi'Y\ cu'YfbA-- 5**~o.{'e.."l-, ~**  o,re:.o..._.**-~+** hcts**~ .re}en:k-tes;~**  

### I.**rtfi~**

. .**R~El~D** (n**0u(ll'~l(\** rtA-o)8o'3.. JUL072015 

### J-- hwik..

### ~**dealc':Ju,r,~** 

### £o..;J h&rcw·

### ~ {6r Y.

### CcAr>~A~~j~f.~sno.V. 

### T-hG\M:- Y"'<.a.J()l) 

## to**be\ieN'~** 

### YYtj ceil 

## ptwv 

## Cveri<PrV \> 

## :bev'::/1-1--o.d::.zJ**~** 

## u.s-eJ 

## +o**op.e~.PY,:) ~'Ia;_);~**  

### :C.. he<-v-e....-en.dure..d 

### ·\+ti)**e\..)e!~ u~n**  CllT1-Vcv\

### .1-z,wov·~~-}$:'3oo,'lh**)usJ--~.-e** 

### , lunclll. l \: 3cs CVfYI; C:Uc.ci upon 

### q**e~~** .ko"W\. l.)J<::sv}::_ , 

### [**~** 

### 0'ko**~$- (Jqs~**  

## CCL«:) ofp\cur\.e.._) 

### dropp:v:.J -\-o an un<;0vk 

### ct\+-i·+v<k**;e:j~~** :so 

### lOL<J 

# .r- CW"\**ctlmcr.&~~Yl);clQ** -J-h_Q_ 

### p!Oir'-e._ 

# ;r+- n.af9£J1.5 qGt-k

### -fr<q_uerJ-~ ·

### ·J:_~ :I'

### ~o .-fc. 

### ¥Yj kb!niCJJ 

### ,Suhpe o-e.di=\-CacfJ j 

### Lflt.JY'cJ) J 

### 9 0 hov'J.R-

### h~'hJ**Wl~** 

### Yh-) t..U

### i~ Ovf\-ct -€VCVl d

### u~tj rHrM-..)



## o-x=- ; 'll+. '(Y"\0.. 

# I "**~ a..,lr-c.~.+£**  u.:.:.HJtJ. k

### CC>f);~C/ 

### oJ) ct} rhJ)-e)) 

### yYt,ed**~~~:#anJ** 5ome_

### -h~) 

### ·rni'l**~~"** (){:.je!n

### roo~)**~** YtCl\JJ-e- 

### ta**-~ .i&VYJovh,-~'**  

### I

## c.:on~okJ KjcanJ .PflA 

# +w;**~~o** also 

### In

## ~.~.k**(Y)&Olto~ ~)**  

### ·fcr[oLi-twre:. I.AJQ.J YltJ.+ Yf)\Juh 

### l Cd\J 

## Jd d. 6**l:;ui--pu1-~** \.) tcl.e0 OY\ q 

## rvo w\¥vt 

### rn.-) 

### oomyJ-\e.r.**:L:)o+-~?<a.~~~y0..ej** wcw:l 

### J vJ+ 1-E:j**~~fi\q_+;ze.._ tt~** **.h,~** GlM**t~'-?ovk~** 5o**~w~_- ::Lct\s~** **co~~** 

### L"JC"fYI 1\fl 6o5A«>**~** 

### rec..e.cueJ. cL 

### l**~tk-** iY"l 16part ;K.... 

### JP}'V)J 

### +h1.s 

## Je:j ...}h,'YIJ

### J:_ -}1'vY\- -\-hl3 ·i> 0e-+



### M~ **-vv~** 

# ·* f=A-Pr

**~1-toJd opo~.**  

# ·r woucl

**\)Je\~**
**~** 

## off o rtvn

**,-t~** 

### ·4-o d \; c;vJ) 

# *

**~~** 

### h_x 

### d+-et--anq 

### .fo

**\~r(\_d-** 

### hcr,A) 

### '{ov propo»L ·to 

## pt-ever-Jra semi 

### ircur 511-tJo;{ror-.._

**~c-~** ('e_cvlll h)(< 

## T- I cul kwanl 1u

**}~;;'tJ** 

## FvovY\- 'j ou



### rn~1 

## -,p 

## J' b4



### I~ **~·n__r** ?- 

### 4 IJ.eu.;brf d ).,Q_

**~** 

### &>rLhr 

## rnr+ 6lg05
6 66:

**~** 31Y

- '-\?-o?-. /

**c-e~** \

### m LO

..... . .

I I I I I I I I I I I
* This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the doctrines

of law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. The court generally

disfavors the citation of orders and judgments; nevertheless, an order and judgment

may be cited under the terms and conditions of 10th Cir. R. 36.3. 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

Filed 8/22/96

FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT

ESTHER MOSES, on behalf of

Herbert Moses, deceased,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

ROGER C. BOND, M.D.; SANFORD

FITZIG, M.D.; ALEX D. AMMAR,

M.D.; EMERGENCY MEDICAL

SERVICES OF SEDGWICK

COUNTY; CHESTER L. PINKSTON,

JR., Wichita Police ID 1438,

Defendants-Appellees.

No. 95-3382

(D.C. No. 95-4112-DES)

(D. Kan.)

ORDER AND JUDGMENT*

Before ANDERSON, LOGAN, and MURPHY, Circuit Judges.

After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined

unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the determination of
-2-

this appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a); 10th Cir. R. 34.1.9. The case is therefore

ordered submitted without oral argument.

Plaintiff appeals the district court’s dismissal of her medical malpractice

action for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. We review such a dismissal de

novo. Laguna Gatuna, Inc. v. Browner, 58 F.3d 564, 565 (10th Cir. 1995), cert.

denied, 116 S. Ct. 771 (1996). 

Generally, federal courts have subject matter jurisdiction only if a case

involves parties with diverse citizenship in an action for at least $50,000, 28

U.S.C. § 1332, or if the case involves a question of federal law, 28 U.S.C. § 1331. 

See United States ex rel. Gen. Rock & Sand Corp. v. Chuska Dev. Corp., 55 F.3d

1491, 1496 (10th Cir. 1995). Because all of the parties to this action are Kansas

residents, plaintiff has failed to establish diversity jurisdiction. See id. at 1495. 

Plaintiff also has failed to allege a federal claim against the defendant physicians. 

Further, even if we liberally construed plaintiff’s complaint to allege federal

constitutional claims against the ambulance service and the police officer under

42 U.S.C. § 1983, see Haines v. Kerner, 404 U.S. 519, 520-21 (1972), those

claims would be barred by the applicable two-year Kansas statute of limitations. 
-3-

See Baker v. Board of Regents, 991 F.2d 628, 630 & n.1 (10th Cir. 1993) (citing

Kan. Stat. Ann. § 60-513(a)(4)).

AFFIRMED. The mandate shall issue forthwith.

Entered for the Court

James K. Logan 

Circuit Judge
#### John SMETANA, Appellant, v. Dolores SMETANA, Appellee.

No. 69-433.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

June 22, 1970.

Rehearing Denied Sept. 9, 1970.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
y



### MANDATE



## Court of Appeals

**First District of Texas**

NO. 01

- 1 5

- 00 20 9

- CV

DOCTORS PRACTICE MANAGEMENT, INC. , Appellant

V.

MEDICAL MULTIMEDIA ADVERTISING, INC. , Appellee

Appeal from the 234 th District Court of Harris County. (Tr. Ct. No. 20 1 3

- 36797 ).

TO THE 234 TH DISTRICT COURT OF HARRIS COUNTY, GREETINGS:

Before this Court , on the 4 th day of June

, 201 5 , the cause upon appeal to revise or to

reverse your judgment was determined. This Court made its order in these words:

This case is an appeal from the final judgment signed by the trial court on December 8, 2014. After due consideration, the Court grants the parties’ joint motion to reverse a nd render judgment. Accordingly, the

Court vacates the trial court’s judgment and renders judgment that Medical Multimedia Advertising, Inc. take nothing in its action against Doctors Practice Management, Inc.; that Doctors Practice Management, Inc. take nothing in its counterclaims against Medical Multimedia Advertising, Inc.; that all claims that were or could have been brought by Medical Multimedia Advertising, Inc. in this lawsuit are dismissed with prejudice; that all

counterclaims that were or could have been brought by Doctors Practice Management, Inc. in this lawsuit are dismissed with prejudice; and that each party shall bear its own expenses and attorney fees.

The Court orders that costs be taxed against the party incurring the

same.The Court or ders that this decision be certified below for observance.

Judgment rendered June 4 , 201 5

.

Per curiam opinion delivered by panel consisting of Chief Justice

Radack and Justices Higley and Massengale

.

WHEREFORE, WE COMMAND YOU to observe the order of our said Court in

this behalf and in all things to have it duly recognized, obeyed, and executed.

June 1 6 , 2015

Date CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE

CLERK OF THE COURT
<TABLE> <S> <C>




<ARTICLE> 5


<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                          90,771
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                4,116,577
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             4,209,703
<PP&E>                                         362,646
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (53,794)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,906,638
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,380,288
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                    109,764
<COMMON>                                       101,985
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,305,953
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 4,906,638
<SALES>                                      4,633,647
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             4,633,647
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,212,785
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              (2,180)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              2,423,042
<INCOME-TAX>                                   920,396
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,502,646
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,502,646
<EPS-BASIC>                                      .07
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .07



</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1918 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

113th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 1918

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide a special change 
     in status rule for employees who become eligible for TRICARE.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            January 14, 2014

 Mrs. Shaheen introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide a special change 
     in status rule for employees who become eligible for TRICARE.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Clarity for Military Retiree Health 
Care Act''.

SEC. 2. SPECIAL CHANGE IN STATUS RULE FOR EMPLOYEES WHO BECOME ELIGIBLE 
              FOR TRICARE.

    (a) In General.--Subsection (g) of section 125 of the Internal 
Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by adding at the end the following new 
paragraph:
            ``(5) Change in status relating to tricare eligibility.--
        For purposes of this section, if a cafeteria plan permits an 
        employee to revoke an election during a period of coverage and 
        to make a new election based on a change in status event, an 
        event that causes the employee to become eligible for coverage 
        under the TRICARE program shall be treated as a change in 
        status event.''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by this section shall apply 
to events occurring after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
### Page 1 of 3 **Disposition Comments Docket No:**  

### FAA - 201 4 - 0 7 71 These comments are in **Directorate ID:** 

### 201 4 - CE - 0 06 - AD response to an SNPRM Originating Office Tracking No.: **Next Step:** FRAN SNPRM 

### N o C omments/Only

Supportive Comments Received

– If this box is checked, no signatures are required. No 

### Has the reference d service information been revised since the NPRM was issued? I f ye s, lis t latest revision and attach a cop y. Note that changes beyond the scope of the previously published NPRM will require a new notice. Contact the Directorate focal point for guidance. Instructions: Summarize all comments **by issue** (not by commenter) and provide your recommended resolution of each issue. **All comments relating to the sam e issue should be discussed together.**  Do not list all of the issues from one commenter together. If changes to the AD are required based on the comments received, explain why and describe in detail what change(s) you recommend. Reference FAA - IR- M - 8040.1C Chapter 9. **ISSUE 1:** Select one o

f the following : If other, explain : Commenter(s): What change to the AD action is requested? Why is the change requested or how is it justified? Do we agree? If **YES,** we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: If **PARTIALLY AGREE** , we agree with because We disagree with because

Make the following changes to the AD: If **NO** , we don’t agree because **ISSUE 2**  **:** Select one of the following :

If other, explain : Commenter(s): What change to the AD action is requested? Why is the change requested or how is it justified? Do we agree? If **YES,** we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: If **PARTIALLY AGREE** , we agree with because We disagree with because Make the following changes to the AD:

### Page 2 of 3

If **NO** , we don’t agree because **For additional issues, do uble**  **- click**  **here**

### Page 3 of 3 **S ignature Section**  Signature indicates concurrence with this action. Originating Office Tracking No.: **ASE** Printed Name **: Date** 

**Branch M anager**  **Date**
#### WORLD BUSINESS BROKERS, INC., a Florida corporation, Appellant, v. CARTER MANUFACTURING COMPANY, INC., et al., Appellees.

No. 73-389.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Oct. 30, 1973.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed.
Materials Not Included in

Airworthiness Directive (AD) Docket

 Docket Number: FAA-2013-0869

 Directorate Identifier: 2013NM063AD

 767-27A0222 --- 6/24/10

Name/Description of Item(s) Not Included in FDMS Docket and Maintained in the 

Supplemental AD Docket

MAY BE VIEWED AT: Federal Aviation Administration

Transport Airplane Directorate

Rules Docket

1601 Lind Ave. SW.,

Renton, WA 98057

425.227.1221

DURING THE HOURS OF: 9 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday through Friday,

except Federal holidays.

Form Date: 03/05/2008
251 La. 674

#### SOUTHERN BELL TELEPHONE *&*TELEGRAPH COMPANY v. ADMINISTRATOR, DIVISION OF EMPLOYMENT SECURITY OF DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, State of Louisiana, and Patricia B. Broussard.

No. 49009.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Dec. 20, 1967.

In re: F. C. Doyal, Jr., Administrator of the Division of Employment Security, Department of Labor, State of Louisiana, for certiorari, or writ of review to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, 203 So.2d 749.

It is ordered that the writ of review issue ; that the Court of Appeal send up the record in duplicate of the case; and that counsel for plaintiff and defendant be notified.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The contract proposals and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the contract proposals, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences Special Emphasis Panel; Pharmacology Studies and Model Development.                    

*Date:*                         September 12, 2018.                    

*Time:*                         9:30 a.m. to 12:00 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate contract proposals.                    

*Place:*                         National Institutes of Health, One Democracy Plaza, Room 1087, 6701 Democracy Boulevard, Bethesda, MD 20892 (Telephone Conference Call).                    

*Contact Person:*                         M. Lourdes Ponce, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, Office of Scientific Review, National Center for Advancing Translational, Sciences (NCATS), National Institutes of Health, 6701 Democracy Blvd., Democracy 1, Room 1073, Bethesda, MD 20892, 301-435-0810,                         *lourdes.ponce@nih.gov*.                    

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.859, Pharmacology, Physiology, and Biological Chemistry Research; 93.350, B—Cooperative Agreements; 93.859, Biomedical Research and Research Training, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: August 14, 2018.

Melanie J. Pantoja,

Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2018-17926 Filed 8-17-18; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE 4140-01-P