## To: Cortney_Higgins@omb.eop.gov From: Melanie King/RTP/USEPA/US Date: 01/11/2013 04:39PM Cc: RobertJ Wayland/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Michael Horowitz/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, Paul Balserak/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, Paula VanLare/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, Larry Sorrels/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Amy Lamson/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA Subject: revised RICE preamble and impacts memo Cortney, Attached is a redline/strikeout of the preamble and the impacts memo, which shows the changes we made in response to interagency comments and also correcting minor typos etc. Larry is going to be sending you the revised RIA very shortly. I have to run to pick up my kids but I'll check email later or you can call Bob if you have any issues. Thanks and hope you have a great time camping. (See attached file: E O 12866 RICE Reconsideration 2060-AQ58 Final 20130111 pm REDLINE.docx)(See attached file: RICE NESHAP Reconsideration Impacts - Final Rule 1-11- 13 DRAFT.docx) Melanie King Energy Strategies Group Sector Policies and Programs Division Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Mail Code D243-01 RTP, NC 27711 Phone: (919) 541-2469 Fax: (919) 541-5450 king.melanie@epa.gov

=DRAFT – DELIBERATIVE – DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE 

# E C 

# /

R Incorporated Providing Environmental Technical Support Since 1989

501 Eastowne Drive, Suite 325  Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27514 Telephone: (919) 484-0222  Fax: (919) 484-0122 MEMORANDUM

DATE: January 11 , 2013

SUBJECT: RICE NESHAP Reconsideration Final Am endments - Cost and Environmental Impacts FROM: Tanya Parise, EC/R, Inc. TO: Melanie King, EPA OAQPS/SPPD/ESG

The EPA is finalizing amendments to the national emission standards for hazardous air pollutants (NESHAP) for stationary reciprocating internal com bustion engines (RICE) in 40 CFR part 63, subpart ZZZZ. The purpose of this memorandum is to present the estimated impacts associated with the amendments being promulgated compared to the 2010 final rules (75 FR 9648 and 75 FR 51570) that addressed existing stationary RICE less than or equal to 500 horsepower (H P) located at major sources and existing stationary RICE located at area sources. This memorandum will also discuss amendments that will affect other engines subject to the RICE NESHAP and the effect on impacts for those engines. The amendments include alternative compliance opti ons for certain stationary engines, management practices for a subset of existing stationary engines in sparsely populated areas, and alternative monitoring and compliance options for the same engines in populat ed areas. In addition, the EPA is increasing the demand response (DR) allowance for stationary emergency RICE. The sp ecific amendments being finalized and how these changes will affect emission reduction estimates and the total costs of the rule are discussed in the paragraphs that follow. It should be noted that these impacts are identical to those estimated for the amendments proposed to the RICE NESHAP in June 2012. Non-Emergency Stationary SI RICE >500 HP Located at Area Sources Engines in Sparsely Populated Areas Existing stationary non-emergency 4-stroke lean burn (4SLB) and 4-stroke rich burn (4SRB) spark ignition (SI) engines greater than 500 HP at area sources that are in sparsely populated (remote) areas will be subject to management practices under the amendments. A remote area is defined as either: (1) an offshore area that is beyond the line of ordinary low water along that portion of the coast of the United States that is in direct contact with the open seas and beyond the line marking the seaward limit of inland waters; (2) a pipeline segment with 10 or fewer buildings intended for human occupancy and no buildings intended for human occupancy with four or more stories within 220 ya rds (200 meters) on either side of the centerline of any continuous 1-mile (1.6 kilometers) length of pipeli ne and that does not lie within 100 yards (91 meters) of either a building or a small, well-defined outsi de area (such as a playground, recreation area, outdoor theater, or other place of public assembly) that is occ upied by 20 or more persons on at least 5 days a week for 10 weeks in any 12-month period; or (3) engines not located on pipelines that have 5 or fewer buildings Field Code Changed

Deleted: 4DRAFT – DELIBERATIVE – DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE

2 intended for human occupancy within a 0.25 mile radius around the engine. Under the amendments, these engines are no longer subject to emission standards necessitating the use of aftertreatment, but subject to management practices instead; no em ission reductions have been estima ted from meeting the management practices. The capital and annual costs for these engine s would decrease substantially from those estimated for the 2010 final rule because owners and operators would not have to purchase, operate and maintain a catalyst, plus owners and operators would not be required to monitor the catalyst inlet temperature continuously or record the pressure drop monthly. The only costs attributed to engines subject to management practices are for maintaining records of the maintenance conducted on the engine in order to dem onstrate that the engine is operated and maintained according to the manufacturer’s em ission-related operation and main tenance (O&M) requirements or the owner or operator’s own maintenance plan. It is expected that the majority of owners and operators are already following some type of O&M requirements a nd little additional burden is expected. Therefore, minimal recordkeeping costs were estimated at 1 hour per year for each engine at a technical labor rate of $72 per hour. Owners and operators of SI engines that ar e subject to management practices are not subject toany reporting requirements and therefore no reporting costs were estimated for these engines. Existing nonemergency 4-stroke SI engines greater than 500 HP at area sources are predominantly located in sparsely populated areas; more specifically, according to industr y information, about 90 percent of these engines are in Class 1 areas. Engines in Populated Areas Existing stationary non-emergency 4SLB and 4SRB SI engines greater than 500 HP at area sources that are not in remote areas are subject to an equi pment standard under the amendments that would require the use of a catalyst. Under the am endments, existing stationary non- emergency 4SLB SI engines do not have to meet numeric emission limits, but have to demonstrate by testing that the catalyst is achieving a 93 percent carbon monoxide (CO) reduction or that CO em issions at the engine exhaust do not exceed 47 parts per million by volume, dry basis (ppm vd). Existing stationary non-emerge ncy 4SRB engines are required to demonstrate via testing that the catalyst is reducing CO by 75 percent or more, or alternatively that total hydrocarbons (THC) emissions are being reduced by 30 pe rcent or more. Alternatively, 4SRB engines can demonstrate compliance with a CO concentration level of 270 ppmvd at 15 percent O 2 . Given that owners and operators would still have to use add-on controls on their engines and the same catalyst performance is expect ed as previously estimated, and because pollutant reductions estimated for the 2010 rule are conservatively based on the averag e control efficiencies observed during EPA’s testing program at Colorado State University (CSU) for 4SLB engines and industry testing for 4SRB engines, the same emissions reductions estimated for the 2010 rule are expected under the amendments for existing stationary non-emergency 4SLB and 4SRB SI engines greater than 500 HP at area sources in populated areas. The control efficiencies are documented in the memorandum “Imp acts Associated with NESHAP for Existing Stationary SI RICE” available from www.regulations.gov as Document ID Numbers EPA-HQOAR-2008-0708-0542, The changes are expected to lower costs in term s of monitoring and testing expenses. Under the amendments, owners and operators no longer have to perform monthly m easurements of the pressure drop across the catalyst. Owners and operators are still be required to monitor the catalyst inlet temperature or use a high temperature shutdown device to protect the catalyst , but they do not have to continuously record the catalyst inlet temperature. High temperature shut down devices are typical on engines and the EPA hasDRAFT – DELIBERATIVE – DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE

3 assumed that all the engines will already have such a device installed on their units. Therefore, no cost has been estimated for this requirement. The costs would be further reduced for 4SRB SI engines because the rule will allow less expensive CO and THC testing in place of formaldehyde testing, which is more expensive. Non-emergency engines in populated areas will con tinue to be subject to the same recordkeeping and reporting requirements as required in 2010 rule, such as reading instructions, training personnel, submitting an initial notification, and submitting semi-annual comp liance reports. It is estimated that a total of 14 hours will be needed, including 4 hours for reading the rule , 4 hours for training, and 6 hours for preparing and submitting notifications and compliance reports. Existin g non-emergency 4-stroke engines greater than 500 HP at area sources in populated areas account for 10 percent of the total population of 4-stroke engines above 500 HP at area sources, according to industry estimates. THC Compliance Demonstration Option In addition to a reduction in testing costs discu ssed for existing 4-stroke e ngines at area sources and the estimated cost impacts presented in Table 2, additi onal savings are expected for owners and operators of existing and new stationary 4SRB engines above 500 HP located at major sources. Owners and operators of these engines currently have the option of either li miting the concentration of formaldehyde or reducing formaldehyde emissions, a requirement that was promulgated as part of the original 2004 RICE NESHAP rulemaking. The amendments provide these owners and operators an alternative THC compliance demonstration option. It is expected that owners and operators will take advantage of the THC testing option as opposed to testing for formaldehyde, but the number of engines that will be tested for THC instead of formaldehyde is unknown. Therefore, the specific cost savings associated with this amendment has not been calculated, however, it is expected that the testing burden will be substantially reduced. The cost of formaldehyde stack testing used to estimate testing costs for the 2004 rule was close to $6,000. Estimates available today indicate that CO or THC testing can be performed for around $1,000. Subsequently, it is possible that cost savings related to performance testing could be as high as 80 percent. Emergency DR The EPA is increasing the DR allowance for sta tionary emergency engines. The amendments would increase the DR allowance for emer gency engines from 15 hours per year (hrs/yr) to an allowance of 100 hrs/yr that would include operation for maintenance a nd testing purposes and DR operation. Engines greater than 300 HP that operate for more than 15 hrs/yr for emergency DR must use ultra low sulfur diesel (ULSD) and report on an annual basis the dates and time s the engines operated for emergency DR purposes. To estimate emissions from emergency engines the EPA has previously estimated that these types of engines would on average operate for 50 hrs/yr. The average hours of operation for emergency engines is not expected to change based on the amendments and 50 hrs/yr is still believed to be representative of average emergency engine operation. Therefore, the emissions previously calculated remain appropriate. In terms of any revenue generated from participation in DR programs, the EPA expects owners and operators will benefit financially, however, the EPA does not know to what extent. The EPA expects there will be savings and/or income generated through participation in em ergency DR programs, but the EPA has not accounted for any potential revenue in estimating the costs and be nefits of the amendments. It is uncertain how many engines participate in these programs and how freque ntly stationary emergency engines would operate if they are called upon. According to data from DR progr ams in ISO-NE and PJM territories backup generationDRAFT – DELIBERATIVE – DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE

4 was dispatched for less than 30 hours during the summers of 2008, 2009 and 2010. a Another example of emergency engines operating infrequen tly for DR programs can be found in Table 1 of a 2010 letter from EnerNOC to EPA b that presents a summary of emergency DR events in New England. According to EnerNOC, emergency engines have only been called upon three times in New England, where the duration of the events was 3.75, 5.95 and 16.5 hours in 2006, 2005 , and 2003, respectively. Other factors, such as the annual revenue from DR programs (which varies), are al so uncertain making it problematic to estimate the economic benefit of such programs. As such, the EPA has not estimated any costs associated with the emergency engine amendments. For the final rule, the EPA is requiring that if engines greater than 300 HP exceed or agree to be available for more than 15 hrs/yr for emergency DR that the owners/operators use ULSD fuel and report annually the dates and times the engines operated for emergency DR purposes. The rule requires owners/operators to being using ULSD on January 1, 2015. Owners and operators would have to begin tracking engine operation for the 2015 calendar year and submit the first annual report early in 2016 that would cover 2015. The costs associated with other requ irements of the rule discussed in this memorandum have been assessed for 2013, the year owners and oper ators will have to start complying with the rule. However, the costs associated with ULSD fuel and annual reporting would not be incurred in 2013, but will start later in 2015/2016, which for NESHAPs is outside the typical time period the EPA presents estimates for. With that said, conducting a complete estimate of the total impact of the ULSD requirement associated with operating for more than 15 hrs/yr for emergency DR in any year is still not possible because the number of engines that would be affected by th is requirement is unknown. The EPA does not know the number of engines that will be operated for emergenc y DR and the EPA does not know how many of those engines would operate for more than 15 hrs/yr. The EPA believes the ULSD cost would be balanced out by the reduced engine maintenance that is expected from using this fuel. Also, the cost difference between ULSD fuel and higher sulfur fuel is small, especially considering that the yearly operation for emergency DR would be limited to no more than 100 hours per year, and subsequently also the fuel consumption. As of July 2012, the pre-tax cost of ULSD to the end user was $3.003 per gallon. c The cost of other No. 2 diesel fuels ranged from $2.753 to $2.989 per gallon, depending on the sulfur content and other fuel characteristics. The difference in fuel costs could therefore range from 1.4 to 25 cents per gallon between UL SD and various No. 2 diesel fuels. At the end of July 2012, the cost of residual fuel oil was $2.406, which compared to the cost of ULSD is about 60 cents per gallon higher. Based on the amount of and heating value of the fu el currently used by these engines, switching to ULSD fuel would have a small cost impact because the engines are used so infrequently. Based on the lower heating value of U.S. conventional diesel of 128,450 Btu/gal d , a 300 HP engine operating for 100 hrs/yr may use approximately 1,560 gal diesel/yr. Therefore, the fuel cost differential of switching from No. 2 diesel

a Memorandum from Stacy Angel, Synapse Energy Economics, Inc. to Doug Hurley, Synapse Energy Economics. Sample Revenue for a 1 MW Backup Generation Unit. June 27, 2011. b Attachment 2 to Letter from Richard H. Counihan, EnerNOC to Melanie King, EPA. February 11, 2011.EPA-HQOAR-2008.0708-0748.2.

c Refiner Petroleum Product Prices by Sales Type. Sales to End Users. http://www.eia.gov/dnav/pet/p et_pri_refoth_dcu_nus_m.htm . July 2012. d http://cta.ornl.gov/bedb/appendix_a/Lower_and_Higher_Heating_Values_of_Gas_Liquid_and_Solid_Fuels.pdf. Deleted: and reporting Deleted: sDRAFT – DELIBERATIVE – DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE

5 fuel to ULSD may cost between $22 and $391 on an annua l basis for each engine, as a rough estimate. Based on the lower heating value, switching from residual fuel oil to ULSD may cost $860 per year, depending on the residual fuel oil quality, hours of operation, and size of the engine. Regarding the impact of the requirement to report emergency DR operation, the EPA anticipates that in most cases, the entity that dispatches the engines to operate, such as the curtailment service provider or utility, will report the information to EPA on behalf of the facility that owns the engine. Thus, the burden of the reporting requirement will likely be on the entities that dispatch the engines. The number of entities is uncertain, but the EPA was able to obtain estima tes from the National Rural Electric Cooperative Association of the number of cooperatives that have engines participating in demand response. The NRECA estimated that approximately 446 local utilities w ould engage in the reporting requirement. The EPA estimates that each utility would spend approximately 16 hours per year reporting the information to the EPA. This results in an estimated burden of 7,128 hour s at a cost of $610,000 per year, beginning in the year 2015. The EPA also received information from one cu rtailment service provider, EnerNOC, who estimated the burden of the requirement to be 1,000 hours at a co st of $60,000 in the first year of implementation, 2015, and 250 hours at a cost of $15,000 in subsequent years. Using an estimated number of 70 curtailment service providers nationwide that are operating engi nes for emergency demand response, the burden for curtailment service providers would be 70,000 hours at a cost of $4.2 million in the first year of implementation, 2015, and 17,500 hours at a cost of $1 m illion in subsequent years. Summing the totals for the cooperatives and curtailment service providers yiel ds a total of 77,128 labor hours at a cost of $4.8 million in the first year that reporting is required, 2015, and 24,628 labor hours at a cost of $1.7 million in subsequent years. Finally, as discussed above, the EPA has not estima ted the increased revenue from DR participation by generators with emergency engines, which would likely offset some of the costs (if not all) associated with the ULSD and reporting requirements. Therefore, the EPA believes it is justified in not quantifying these costs that begin to be incurred in 2016, which, as discussed, will be difficult to fully estimate. Stationary Agricultural RICE The EPA is specifying that certified Tier 3 existi ng stationary compression ignition (CI) engines at area sources that were installed before June 12, 2006, are automatically be in compliance with the NESHAP and are not be subject to aftertreatment-forcing standards. This means that these engines will not be required to install add-on controls and subsequently no emission reduction has been estimated for this group of engines. The EPA is no longer accounting for a redu ction in emissions from these engines effectively lowering the estimate of emissions reductions previous ly estimated for the 2010 rule. In California, San Joaquin Valley has identified 17 Tier 3 CI engines in stalled between January 1 and June 12, 2006, which is the number of engines that EPA has used to estimate the impacts of this amendment. In addition, the EPA is specifying that certifie d Tier 1 and Tier 2 existing stationary CI engines greater than 300 HP at area sources th at will be replaced within the next few years due to state/local rules are subject to management practices until 2015, after whic h the numeric emission limits of the NESHAP apply. In California there are 49 of these Tier 1 engines and 360 of these Tier 2 engines, which are the number of engines the EPA has used to estimate the impacts of this amendment. The EPA has not estimated any emissions reductions or control costs under the RICE NE SHAP for these 409 stationary Tier 1 and Tier 2 certified CI engines in the year 2013. Deleted: The costs associated with the reporting requirements would be minimal since facilities are already required to keep records. Because the number of engines that would be reporting the dates/times of emergency DR operation is not known, a total estimate cannot be generated. In terms of the effort to submit annual reports, it is expected that one hour per year per facility would be sufficient to comply with this requirement. As of June 2012, the total compensation for management/professional staff was $51.23 e . Adjusting this compensation rate by applying an overhead rate of 167 percent yields a total wage rate of $85.60, which is expected to cover the reporting requirement.DRAFT – DELIBERATIVE – DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE

6 Remote Stationary RICE in Alaska The EPA is also broadening the definition of remo te area sources of Alaska in the RICE NESHAP. Currently, remote areas are those that are not on th e Federal Aid Highway System (FAHS). This change permits existing stationary CI engines at other remote area sources in Alaska to meet management practices as opposed to emission standards likely necessitating af tertreatment. However, the EPA is unable to quantify the number of engines in remote areas of Alaska that w ould be able to qualify for this provision. Therefore, it was not possible to assess the environmental and econo mic impacts associated wi th this amendment. The EPA does not know how many facilities would be consid ered remote and does not have any information on how many engines are affected.

While the EPA does not have sufficient information to quantify the total impact of this change, the EPA can provide an example of the impact for an individual facility. For instance, the Bailey Power Plant operated by the Ketchikan Public Utilities has four (4) stationary diesel engines. Two (2) rated at 4,500 kilowatt (KW), one (1) rated at 6,450 KW and one (1 ) rated at 10,500 KW. If these four engines would be subject to management practices instead of aftertreatme nt, the lost HAP reductions is estimated to be 1.3 tpy total from the four engines. The lost CO, PM, and VOC emissions are estimated at 1 tpy, 3.7 tpy, and 35 tpy, respectively, in total from these four engines. Under the amendments, the facility would avoid total capital costs associated with required aftertreatment of ove r $960,000. The facility would avoid annual expenditures related to aftertreatment operating and maintenance costs of more than $176,000 per year, if management practices only are required for these engines. A summary of the emission reductions associated wi th the amendments and those estimated for the 2010 final rule are presented in Table 1. Table 1. Summary of Pollutant Reductions for Existing Stationary RICE f

Pollutant Emission Reductions (tpy) in the year 2013 Previous Estimate (2010 Final Rule) RICE Reconsideration (2012 Amendments) CI SI CI SI HAP 1,014 6,008 1,005 1,778 CO 14,342 109,321 14,238 22,211 PM 2,844 N/A 2,818 N/A NO x N/A 96,479 N/A 9,648 VOC 27,395 30,907 27,142 9,147 Tables 2 and 3 present the pollutant reductions by HP and by area/major sources for the SI and CI portion of the rule, respectively.

f The estimates presented in Tables 1 through 6 are for existing stationary RICE less than or equal to 500 HP located at major sources and existing stationary RICE located at area sources.DRAFT – DELIBERATIVE – DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE

7 Table 2. Pollutant Reductions for Existing Stationary SI RICE – by HP b

Size Range (HP) Emission Reductions (tpy) in the year 2013 HAP CO NO x VOC Major Sources 25-50 0 0 0 0 50-100 0 0 0 0 100-175 744 7,124 0 3,826 175-300 277 2,653 0 1,424 300-500 288 2,755 0 1,480 500-600 N/A N/A N/A N/A 600-750 N/A N/A N/A N/A

>750 N/A N/A N/A N/A Total Major 1,308 12,532 0 6,730 Area Sources 25-50 0 0 0 0 50-100 0 0 0 0 100-175 0 0 0 0 175-300 0 0 0 0 300-500 0 0 0 0 500-600 101 2,070 2,063 517 600-750 22 453 452 113

>750 347 7,156 7,133 1,787 Total Area 470 9,679 9,648 2,418 Total 1,778 22,211 9,648 9,147DRAFT – DELIBERATIVE – DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE

8 Table 3. Pollutant Reductions for Existing Stationary CI RICE – by HP b

Size Range (HP) Emission Reductions (tpy) in the year 2013 HAP CO PM VOC Major Sources 50-100 0 0 0 0 100-175 44 2,072 123 1,183 175-300 57 1,571 161 1,549 300-500 145 2,362 407 3,923 500-600 18 209 50 478 600-750 11 107 31 300

>750 36 236 102 982 Total Major 312 6,558 874 8,416 Area Sources 50-100 0 0 0 0 100-175 0 0 0 0 175-300 0 0 0 0 300-600 363 5,244 1,017 9,798 600-750 91 879 256 2,463

>750 239 1,557 671 6,466 Total Area 693 7,680 1,944 18,727 Total 1,005 14,238 2,818 27,142 A summary of the costs associated with the amendm ents and those estimated for the 2010 final rule are presented in Table 4. All costs were converted to 2010 dollars for purposes of presenting costs associated with the rule in present day terms. However, because the costs estimated for the 2010 rule were in 2008 and 2009 dollars for the CI and SI engine portion of the rule , respectively, the costs fo r the amendments in Table 2 are also shown in those years in order to be able to compare on a consistent basis. Tables 5 and 6 present the cost impacts by NAICS code for the SI and CI portion of the rule, respectively. Table 4. Summary of Cost Impacts for Existing Stationary RICE b

Engine Previous Estimate (2010 Final Rule) RICE Reconsideration (2012 Amendments) Total Annual Cost SI $253 million ($2009) $251 million ($2010) $115 million ($2009) $115 million ($2010) CI $373 million ($2008) $375 million ($2010) $372 million ($2008) $373 million ($2010) Total Capital Cost SI $383 million ($2009) $380 million ($2010) $103 million ($2009) $103 million ($2010) CI $744 million ($2008) $748 million ($2010) $737 million ($2008) $740 million ($2010)DRAFT – DELIBERATIVE – DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE

9 Please refer to the memoranda enti tled “Impacts Associated with NESHAP for Existing Stationary CI RICE” and “Impacts Associated with NESHAP fo r Existing Stationary SI RICE” available from www.regulations.gov as Document ID Numbers EPA-HQ-OAR-2008-0708-0329 and EPA-HQ-OAR-2008- 0708-0542 for additional assumptions and further information on the 2010 rule estimates. The EPA used cost indicies in order to convert between 2008, 2009, and 2010 dollars. Specifically, the Marshall & Swift (M&S) Equipment Cost Index for the different years were applied to total cost estimates to convert the costs to a specific year. To convert the 2009 costs associated with the existing SI engine portion of the rule to 2010 dollars, the EPA divided the total cost by the M&S Annual Index for 2009 (1,468.6) and multiplied the resulting cost by the M& S Equipment Cost Index for 2010 (1,457.4). Similarly, to convert from 2008 dollars, which was the year the costs were previously presented for the existing CI engine portion of the rule, the EPA divided the tota l cost by the M&S Annual Index for 2008 (1,449.3) and multiplied the resulting cost by the M&S Annual Index for 2010 (1,457.4).10Table 5. Summary of Cost Impacts for ExistingStationary SI RICE – by NAICS (2009 Dollars)NAICSMajor SourceArea SourceTotal (Major + Area)Capital CostAnnual CostCapital CostAnnual CostCapital CostAnnual CostElectric Power Generation (2211)$52,905,258 $63,062,494 $11,698,144 $12,138,277 $64,603,403 $75,200,772Natural Gas Transmission (48621)$1,484,494 $1,462,530 $13,718,381 $6,142,839 $15,202,876 $7,605,369Crude Petroleum & NG Production (211111) $4,561,236 $6,138,383 $71,439 $951,462 $4,632,675 $7,089,844Natural Gas Liquid Producers (211112) $4,561,236 $6,138,383 $71,439 $951,462 $4,632,675 $7,089,844National Security (92811) $5,878,362 $7,006,944 $1,299,794 $1,348,697 $7,178,156 $8,355,641HydroPowerUnits(335312) $0 $25,248 $0 $37,872 $0 $63,120Irrigation Sets (335312) $3,025,050 $3,230,856 $3,285,890 $4,999,041 $6,310,940 $8,229,896Welders (333992) $247,440 $679,896 $0 $570,130 $247,440 $1,250,027Total $72,663,076$87,744,734$30,145,088$27,139,780$102,808,163$114,884,514Table 6. Summary of Cost Impacts for ExistingStationary CI RICE – by NAICS (2008 Dollars)NAICSMajor SourceArea SourceTotal (Major + Area)Capital CostAnnual CostCapital CostAnnual CostCapital CostAnnual CostElectric Power Generation (2211)$161,766,376 $90,982,105 $464,947,798 $202,463,116 $626,714,174 $293,445,222Hospitals (622110)$20,220,797 $11,372,763 $0$0 $20,220,797 $11,372,763Crude Petroleum & NG Production (211111) $2,374,401 $3,807,478 $1,590,115 $2,597,836 $3,964,516 $6,405,314Natural Gas Liquid Producers (211112) $2,374,401 $3,807,478 $1,590,115 $2,597,836 $3,964,516 $6,405,314National Security (92811)$20,220,797 $11,372,763 $51,660,866 $22,495,902 $71,881,663 $33,868,665Hydro Power Units (335312)$0 $16,637$0$22,959$0$39,597Irrigation Sets (335312)$10,294,073 $11,791,567 $34,145 $5,208,084 $10,328,218 $16,999,651Welders (333992)$108,260 $1,481,447 $0 $1,881,380 $108,260 $3,362,827Total $217,359,106$134,632,238$519,823,039$237,267,114$737,182,145$371,899,35211 Stationary Diesel RICE on OCS Vessels and Rigs In the original assessment of affected sources that would be covered by the amendments, the EPA did not consider that there could be circum stances during which stationary CI RICE on Outer Continental Shelf (OCS) vessels could be considered stationary and consequently subject to the RICE NESHAP. Therefore, impacts from these units were not assessed in the proposed rule impacts analysis dated May 10, 2012 (EPA-HQ-OAR-2008-0708-0857). The engines in question would be larger than 500 HP and would be considered area sources when they become stationary sources during drilling in the OCS. Consequently, under the proposed rule, thes e engines would have been subject to emission standards outlined in Table 2d of the proposal. Mee ting the emission standards under the proposal would likely have required the use of add-on controls , namely oxidation catalyst, in this case. Comments received on the June 7, 2012, proposed rule argued that there are feasibility issues with complying with the RICE NESHAP for sta tionary diesel engines on offshore vessels and platforms/rigs. Specifically, according to commenters, OCS facilities face strict weight and space constraints for instance, which limit control and testin g options. To comply with the requirements of the RICE NESHAP would not be cost effective, accord ing to commenters. Instead, commenters with sources on the OCS affected by the RICE NESHAP reque sted that stationary engines in these locations be permitted to comply with the rule by following ma intenance practices, similar to those required for smaller (less than 300 HP) existi ng stationary di esel engines. Based on information obtained from EPA Regional Offices, the EPA has identified that in 2013 there are expected to be up to 5 vessels or drilling rigs operating on the OCS that would be subject to the RICE NESHAP as existing sources. Specifically, ba sed on available information obtained from EPA Regions 4 and 10, there would be one drillship in the Chukchi Sea on the Alaska OCS and four drilling rigs or drillships on the OCS of the Gulf of Mexi co. The EPA estimated baseline HAP emissions from these units according to information available in their permits. To be conservative and to estimate the worst-case scenario, HAP emissions were estimated based the maximum allowable amount of operation per drilling season. A summary of the estimated HAP emissions for 2013 are presented in Table 7. Table 7. Total Baseline HAP Emissions from Stationary Engines on OCS Vessels Based on Projected Activity for 2013 Vessel/Rig g tons/yr lb/yr Deepwater Nautilus 2.13E-01 426 Discoverer Spirit 4.76E-03 10 Discoverer 1.13E-01 226 Pathfinder 6.85E-01 1,369 DD1 7.34E-01 1,469

Total: 1.75 h 3,500 As indicated in Table 7, baseli ne emissions from stationary e ngines on OCS sources are low and represent a small amount of total emissions (less than 0.06 percent) from all stationary diesel engines in the U.S. It is unlikely that in the event that the fina l rule did not allow these engines to comply with the rule by following maintenance practices that thes e units would be equipped with oxidation catalyst.

g These are known vessels/rigs that are currently permitted, but similar rigs may be used from year to year. h Note that the HAP emissions are conservative estimates an d may be higher than actual emissions from these sources.DRAFT – DELIBERATIVE – DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE

12 More than likely, owners and operators of these e ngines would have sought a technical infeasibility exemption under 40 CFR 55.7, and if granted, these engines would not have been required to use oxidation catalyst or any other HAP-reducing contro l technology. The exemption would have required the engines to employ a substitute requirement in place of the orig inal RICE NESHAP requirements, which may have involved measures to offset the emis sions from these engines. However, the amount of HAP emissions that would have be en offset is unknown and the EPA is not able to estimate the magnitude of those emissions in the absence of requi ring maintenance practice for these engines. Also, according to Region 4, because the only criteria pollutants the RICE NESHAP requires are CO and formaldehyde as VOC, it is possible that under the ex emption only offsets for these pollutants would be required. Also, the EPA has the discretion to set th e offset ratio to ensure onshore standards and increments are met. Therefore, it is not possibly to quantify the potential offset s that would be required, if the engines were to seek a technical in feasibility exemption under 40 CFR part 55.***E.O. 12866 Review – Draft – Do Not Cite, Quote, or Release During Review***

E.O. 12866 RICE Reconsideration 2060-AQ58 Final 2013011

6560-50-P

**ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY**

**40 CFR Part 63 [EPA-HQ-OAR-2008-0708, FRL-**  **9756-4 ]**  **RIN 2060-AQ58**

**National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants for Reciprocating Internal Combustion Engines; New Source**  **Performance Standards for Stationary Internal Combustion Engines**

**AGENCY:** Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

**ACTION:** Final rule.

**SUMMARY:** The EPA is finalizing amendments to the national emission standards for hazardous air pollutants for stationary reciprocating internal combustion engines. The final amendments include alternative testing options for certain large spark ignition (generally natural gas-fueled) stationary reciprocating internal combustion engines, management practices for a subset of existing spark ignition stationary reciprocating internal combustion engines in sparsely populated areas and alternative monitoring and compliance options for the same engines in populated areas. The EPA is establishing management practices for existing compression ignition engines on offshore vessels. The EPA is also finalizing limits on the hours that stationary emergency engines may be used for emergency demand response and Deleted: 201 3 0109

Deleted: **XXXX-Y*****E.O. 12866 Review – Draft – Do Not Cite, Quote, or Release During Review*** Page 2 of 228 establishing fuel and reporting requirements for certain emergency engines used for emergency demand response. The final amendments also correct minor technical or editing errors in the current regulations for stationary reciprocating internal combustion engines.

**DATES** : This final rule is effective on [INSERT DATE 60 DAYS AFTER PUBLICATION IN THE FEDERAL REGISTER]. The incorporation by reference of certain publications listed in this final rule is approved by the Director of the Federal Register as of [INSERT DATE 60 DAYS AFTER PUBLICATION IN THE FEDERAL REGISTER].

**ADDRESSES:** The EPA has established a docket for this action under Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-OAR-2008-0708

. The EPA also relies onmaterials in Docket ID Nos. EPA-HQ-OAR-2002-0059, EPA-HQ-OAR2005-0029, and EPA-HQ-OAR-2005-0030 and incorporates those

dockets into the record for this final rule. All documents in the docket are listed on the www.regulations.gov website. Although listed in the index, some information is not publicly available, e.g., Confidential Business Information or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Certain other material, such as copyrighted material, is not placed on the Internet and will be publicly available only in hard copy form. Publicly available docket materials are available either electronically through www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at the Air and Radiation Docket, EPA/DC, EPA West, Room 3334, 1301***E.O. 12866 Review – Draft – Do Not Cite, Quote, or Release During Review*** Page 3 of 228 Constitution Ave., NW, Washington, DC. The Public Reading Room is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding legal holidays. The telephone number for the Public Reading Room is (202) 566-1744, and the telephone number for the Air Docket is (202) 566-1742.

**FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:** Ms. Melanie King, Energy Strategies Group, Sector Policies and Programs Division (D243- 01), Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27711; telephone number (919) 541-2469; facsimile number (919) 541-5450; email address king.melanie@epa.gov.

**SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION** : Background Information Document . On June 7, 2012 (77 FR 33812), the EPA proposed amendments to the national emission standards for hazardous air pollutants (NESHAP) for stationary reciprocating internal combustion engines (RICE) and the new source performance standards (NSPS) for stationary engines. A summary of the public comments on the proposal and the EPA’s responses to the comments, as well as the Regulatory Impact Analysis Report, are available in Docket ID No. EPA–HQ–OAR–2008–0708.

**SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION** : Organization of This Document

. The following outline is provided to aid in locating information in the preamble.

I. General Information A. Executive Summary B. Does this action apply to me?***E.O. 12866 Review – Draft – Do Not Cite, Quote, or Release During Review*** Page 4 of 228 C. Where can I get a copy of this document? D. Judicial Review II. Summary of Final Amendments A. Total Hydrocarbon Compliance Demonstration Option B. Emergency Demand Response and Reliability C. Peak Shaving D. Non-Emergency Stationary SI RICE Greater than 500 HP Located at Area Sources E. Stationary CI RICE Certified to Tier Standards F. Definition for Remote Areas of Alaska G. Requirements for Offshore Vessels H. Miscellaneous Corrections and Revisions III. Summary of Significant Changes Since Proposal A. Emergency Demand Response and Reliability B. Peak Shaving C. Non-Emergency Stationary SI RICE Greater than 500 HP Located at Area Sources D. Definition for Remote Areas of Alaska E. Requirements for Offshore Vessels IV. Summary of Environmental, Energy and Economic Impacts A. What are the air quality impacts? B. What are the cost impacts? C. What are the benefits? D. What are the non-air health, environmental and energy impacts? V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews A. Executive Order 12866: Regulatory Planning and Review and Executive Order 13563: Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review B. Paperwork Reduction Act C. Regulatory Flexibility Act D. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act E. Executive Order 13132: Federalism F. Executive Order 13175: Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments G. Executive Order 13045: Protection of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks H. Executive Order 13211: Actions Concerning Regulations that Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use I. National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act J. Executive Order 12898: Federal Actions to Address Environmental Justice in Minority Populations and Low-Income Populations K. Congressional Review Act

**I. General Information*****E.O. 12866 Review – Draft – Do Not Cite, Quote, or Release During Review*** Page 5 of 228 A. Executive Summary 1. Purpose of the Regulatory Action The purpose of this action is to finalize amendments to the NESHAP for stationary RICE under section 112 of the Clean Air Act (CAA). This final rule was developed to address certain issues that were raised by various stakeholders through lawsuits, several petitions for reconsideration of the 2010 RICE

NESHAP amendments and other communications. This final rule also provides clarifications and corrects minor technical or editing

errors in the current RICE NESHAP and revises the NSPS for stationary engines, 40 CFR part 60, subparts IIII and JJJJ, for consistency with the RICE NESHAP. This action is conducted under the authority of section 112 of the CAA, “Hazardous Air Pollutants” (HAP), which requires the

EPA to establish NESHAP for the control of HAP from both new and existing sources in regulated source categories. 2. Summary of the Major Provisions of the Regulatory Action After promulgation of the 2010 RICE NESHAP amendments, the EPA received several petitions for reconsideration, legal challenges, other communications raising issues related to practical implementation and certain factual information that had not been brought to the EPA’s attention during the rulemaking. The EPA has considered this information and comments submitted in response to the proposed amendments, and believes***E.O. 12866 Review – Draft – Do Not Cite, Quote, or Release During Review*** Page 6 of 228

that amendments to the rule to address certain issues are appropriate. Therefore, the EPA is finalizing amendments to 40 CFR part 63, subpart ZZZZ, NESHAP for stationary RICE. The current regulation applies to owners and operators of existing and new stationary RICE at major and area sources of HAP emissions. The applicability of the rule remains the same and is not changed by this final rule. The EPA is also finalizing amendments to the NSPS for stationary engines to conform with certain amendments finalized for the RICE NESHAP. The key amendments to the regulations are summarized in the following paragraphs. The EPA is adding an alternative compliance demonstration option for stationary 4-stroke rich burn (4SRB) spark ignition (SI) engines subject to a 76 percent or more formaldehyde reduction requirement. Owners and operators of 4SRB engines will be permitted to demonstrate compliance with the 76 percent formaldehyde reduction emission standard by testing emissions of total hydrocarbons (THC) and showing that the engine is achieving at least a 30 percent reduction of THC emissions. The alternative compliance option provides a less expensive and less complex, but equally effective, method for demonstrating compliance than testing for formaldehyde. Certain stationary RICE are maintained in order to be able to respond to emergency power needs. This action finalizes***E.O. 12866 Review – Draft – Do Not Cite, Quote, or Release During Review*** Page 7 of 228 limitations on the operation of emergency engines for emergency demand response programs. The final rule limits operation of stationary emergency RICE as part of an emergency demand response program to within the 100 hours per year that were already permitted for maintenance and testing of the engines. The limitation of 100 hours per year ensures that a sufficient number of hours are available for engines to meet regional transmission organization and independent system operator tariffs and other requirements for participating in various emergency demand response programs and will assist in stabilizing the grid during periods of instability, preventing electrical blackouts and supporting local electric system reliability. The final rule also limits operation of certain emergency engines used to avert potential voltage collapse or line overloads that could lead to the interruption of power supply in a local area or region to 50 hours per year; this operation counts as part of the 100 hours of year permitted for maintenance and testing of the engine. This rule also establishes fuel and reporting requirements for emergency engines larger than 100 horsepower (HP) used for this purpose or used (or contractually obligated to be available) for more than 15 hours of emergency demand response per calendar year. The EPA is finalizing management practices for owners and operators of existing stationary 4-stroke SI engines above 500***E.O. 12866 Review – Draft – Do Not Cite, Quote, or Release During Review*** Page 8 of 228 HP that are area sources of HAP emissions and where the engines are remote from human activity. A remote area is defined as either a Department of Transportation (DOT) Class 1 pipeline

location 1 , or, if the engine is not on a pipeline, if within a 0.25 mile radius of the facility there are 5 or fewer buildings intended for human occupancy. The EPA determined that a 0.25 mile radius was appropriate because it is similar to the area used for the DOT Class 1 pipeline location. This final rule establishes management practices for these sources rather than numeric emission limits and associated testing and monitoring. This provision and the division of remote and non-remote engines into two separate subcategories addresses reasonable concerns with accessibility, infrastructure and staffing that stem from the remoteness of the engines and higher costs that would be associated with compliance with the existing requirements. Existing stationary 4-stroke SI engines above 500 HP at area sources that are in populated areas (defined as not in DOT pipeline Class 1 areas, or if not on a pipeline, if within a 0.25 mile radius of the engine there are more than 5 buildings intended for human occupancy) are subject to an equipment standard that requires the installation of HAP-reducing

1 A Class 1 location is defined as an offshore area or any class location unit that has 10 or fewer buildings intended for human occupancy and no buildings with four or more stories within 220 yards (200 meters) on either side of the centerline of any continuous 1-mile (1.6 kilometers) length of pipeline.***E.O. 12866 Review – Draft – Do Not Cite, Quote, or Release During Review*** Page 9 of 228 aftertreatment. The EPA has the discretion to set an equipment standard as generally available control technology (GACT) for engines located at area sources of HAP. Sources are required to test their engines to demonstrate compliance initially, perform catalyst activity check-ups and either monitor the catalyst inlet temperature continuously or employ high temperature shutdown devices to protect the catalyst. To address how certain existing compression ignition (CI) engines are currently regulated, the EPA is specifying that any existing CI engine above 300 HP at an area source of HAP emissions that was certified to meet the Tier 3 engine standards 2 and was installed before June 12, 2006, is in compliance with the NESHAP. This provision creates regulatory consistency between the same engines installed before and after June 12, 2006. Engines at area sources of HAP for which construction commenced before June 12, 2006, are considered existing engines

under the NESHAP. The EPA is finalizing amendments to the requirements for existing stationary Tier 1 and Tier 2 certified CI engines located at area sources that are subject to state and locally enforceable requirements requiring replacement of the engine by June 1, 2018. This addresses a specific concern regarding the

2 See 40 CFR part 89-- Control of Emissions from New and In-Use Nonroad Compression-Ignition Engines.***E.O. 12866 Review – Draft – Do Not Cite, Quote, or Release During Review*** Page 10 of 228 interaction of the NESHAP with certain rules for agricultural engines in the San Joaquin Valley in California. The EPA is allowing these engines to meet management practices under the RICE NESHAP from the May 3, 2013, compliance date until January 1, 2015, or 12 years after installation date, but not later than June 1, 2018. This provision addresses concerns about requiring owners and operators to install controls on their engines in order to meet the RICE NESHAP, and then having to replace their engines shortly thereafter due to state and local rules specifying the replacement of engines. Owners and operators will have additional time to replace their engines without having to install controls, but are required to use management practices during that period. Another change the EPA is making is to broaden the

definition of remote area sources in Alaska in the RICE NESHAP. Previously, remote areas were considered those that are not on the Federal Aid Highway System (FAHS). This change permits existing stationary CI engines at other remote area sources in Alaska to meet management practices rather than numerical emission standards likely to require aftertreatment. These remote areas have the same challenges as areas not on the FAHS, and complying with the current rule would similarly be prohibitively costly and potentially infeasible. In addition to

area sources located in areas of Alaska that are not accessible***E.O. 12866 Review – Draft – Do Not Cite, Quote, or Release During Review*** Page 11 of 228 by the FAHS being defined as remote and subject to management practices, any stationary RICE in Alaska meeting all of the following conditions are subject to management practices: (1) The only connection to the FAHS is through the Alaska Marine Highway System, or the stationary RICE operation is within an isolated grid in Alaska that is not connected to the statewide electrical grid referred to as the Alaska Railbelt Grid, and (2) At least 10 percent of the power generated by the stationary RICE on an annual basis is used for residential purposes, and (3) The generating capacity of the area source is less than 12 megawatts (MW), or the stationary RICE is used exclusively for backup power for renewable energy. The last significant change the EPA is finalizing is to require compliance with management practices rather than numeric emission limits in the RICE NESHAP for existing CI RICE on offshore drilling vessels on the Outer Continental Shelf (OCS) that become subject to the RICE NESHAP as a result of the operation of the OCS regulations (40 CFR part 55). The finalamendments specify that owners and operators of existing nonemergency CI RICE with a site rating greater than 300 HP on offshore drilling vessels on the OCS are required to change the oil every 1,000 hours of operation or annually, whichever occurs***E.O. 12866 Review – Draft – Do Not Cite, Quote, or Release During Review*** Page 12 of 228 first; inspect and clean air filters every 750 hours of operation or annually and replace as necessary; inspect fuel filters and belts, if installed, every 750 hours of operation or annually and replace as necessary; and inspect all flexible hoses every 1,000 hours of operation or annually and replace as necessary. Owners and operators can elect to use an oil analysis program to extend the oil change requirement.

3. Costs and Benefits These final amendments will reduce the capital and annual costs of the original 2010 amendments by $287 million and $139 million, respectively. The EPA estimates that with these final amendments, the capital cost of compliance with the 2010 amendments to the RICE NESHAP in 2013 is $840 million and the annual cost is $490 million ($2010). These costs are identical

to the costs estimated for the amendments to the RICE NESHAP proposed on June 7, 2012, since the changes from the proposal do not affect the costs of the rule in the year 2013. The capital and annual costs of the original 2010 final rule and the 2010 final rule with these final amendments incorporated into the

rule are shown in Table 1. Table 1. Summary of Cost Impacts for Existing Stationary RICE

**Engine 2010 Final Rule**  **2010 Final Rule with these Final Amendments**  **Total Annual Cost SI**  $253 million $251 million $115 million ($2010)***E.O. 12866 Review – Draft – Do Not Cite, Quote, or Release During Review*** Page 13 of 228 ($2009) ($2010) **CI** $373 million ($2008) $375 million ($2010) $373 million ($2010) **Total Capital Cost SI**  $383 million ($2009) $380 million ($2010) $103 million ($2010)

**CI** $744 million ($2008) $748 million ($2010) $740 million ($2010)

These final amendments would also result in decreases to the emissions reductions estimated in 2013 from the original

2010 RICE NESHAP amendments. The reductions that were estimated for the original 2010 RICE NESHAP amendments were 7,000 tpy of HAP, 124,000 tpy of CO, 2,800 tpy of PM, 96,000 tpy of NOx and 58,000 tpy of VOC. The estimated reductions in 2013 from the 2010 RICE NESHAP rulemaking with these final amendments are 2,800 tons per year (tpy) of HAP, 36,000 tpy of carbon monoxide (CO), 2,800 tpy of particulate matter (PM), 9,600 tpy of nitrogen oxide (NOx), and 36,000 tpy of volatile organic compounds (VOC). The difference in the emission reductions is primarily due to the changes to the requirements for existing 4- stroke stationary SI RICE at area sources of HAP that are in

remote areas. These emission reduction estimates are identical to those estimated for the June 7, 2012, proposed amendments to the RICE NESHAP. The emission reductions of the original 2010

final rule and the 2010 final rule with these final amendments incorporated into the rule are shown in Table 2. Table 2. Summary of Reductions for Existing Stationary RICE***E.O. 12866 Review – Draft – Do Not Cite, Quote, or Release During Review*** Page 14 of 228

**Pollutant Emission Reductions (tpy)**  **in the year 2013 2010 Final Rule**  **2 010 Final Rule with**  **these Final Amendments CI SI**  **C I**  **S I**  **HAP** 1,014 6,008 1,005 1,778 **CO** 14,342 109,321 14,238 22,211 **PM** 2,844 N/A 2,818 N/A **NO x**  N/A 96,479 N /A 9 ,648 **VOC** 27,395 30,907 27,142 9,147

The EPA estimates the monetized co-benefits in 2013 of the original 2010 RICE NESHAP amendments with these final amendments incorporated to be $830 million to $2,100 million (2010 dollars) at a 3-percent discount rate and $740 million to $1,800 million (2010 dollars) at a 7-percent discount rate. The benefits that were estimated for the original 2010 RICE NESHAP amendments were $1,500 million to $3,600 million (2010 dollars) at a 3-percent discount rate and $1,300 million to $3,200 million (2010 dollars) at a 7-percent discount rate. A summary of the monetized co-benefits estimates for CI and SI engines at discount rates of 3 percent and 7 percent for the original 2010

final rule and the 2010 final rule with these final amendments incorporated into the rule is in Table 3 of this preamble. Table 3. Summary of the Monetized PM 2.5 Co-Benefits Final Amendments to the NESHAP for Stationary CI and SI Engines (millions of 2010 dollars) a, b***E.O. 12866 Review – Draft – Do Not Cite, Quote, or Release During Review*** Page 15 of 228

Pollutant Emission reductions

(tons per

year) Total monetized co-benefits

(3 percent Discount) Total monetized co-benefits

(7 percent Discount) Original 2010 Final Rules c Stationary CI Engines Total Benefits 2,844 PM 2.5 27,395 VOC $950 to $2,300 $860 to $2,100 Stationary SI Engines Total Benefits 96,479 NOx 30,907 VOC $510 to $1,300 $470 to $1,100 2010 Final Rules with these Final Amendments Stationary CI Engines Directly emitted PM 2.5 2,818 $770 to $1,900 $690 to $1,700 Stationary SI Engines NOx 9,648 $62 to $150 $ 55 to $140

a All estimates are for the analysis year (2013) and are rounded to two significant figures so numbers may not sum across rows. The total monetized co-benefits reflect the human health benefits associated with reducing exposure to PM 2.5 through reductions of PM 2.5 precursors, such as NOx and directly emitted PM 2.5 . It is important to note that the monetized co-benefits do not include reduced health effects from exposure to HAP, direct exposure to NO 2 , exposure to ozone, ecosystem effects or visibility impairment. b PM co-benefits are shown as a range from Pope, et al. (2002) to Laden, et al. (2006). These models assume that all fine particles, regardless of their chemical composition, are equally potent in causing premature mortality because the scientific evidence is not yet sufficient to allow differentiation of effects estimates by particle type.

c The benefits analysis for the 2010 final rules applied outdated benefit-per-ton estimates compared to the updatedestimates described in this preamble and reflected monetized cobenefits for VOC emissions, which limits direct comparability with the monetized co-benefits estimated for this final rule. In addition, these estimates have been updated from their original currency years to 2010$, so the rounded estimates for the 2010 final rules may not match the original RIAs.***E.O. 12866 Review – Draft – Do Not Cite, Quote, or Release During Review*** Page 16 of 228

We have not re-estimated the benefits for the final rule compared to the proposal because the emission reductions

estimated for the final rule are the same as those estimated for the proposed amendments. Since the June 7, 2012, reconsideration proposal, the EPA has made several updates to the approach we use to estimate mortality and morbidity benefits in the PM NAAQS Regulatory Impact Analysis (RIA), 3,4 including updated epidemiology studies, health endpoints, and population data. Although the EPA has not re-estimated the benefits for this rule to apply this new approach, these updates generally offset each other, and we anticipate that the rounded benefits estimated for this rule are unlikely to be different than those provided

above. More detail regarding the air quality and cost impacts and

the benefits from this action can be found in section IV of this preamble. B. Does this action apply to me?

3 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (U.S. EPA). 2012a. Regulatory Impact Analysis for the Proposed Revisions to the National Ambient Air Quality Standards for Particulate Matter

. EPA-452/R-12-003. Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards, Health and Environmental Impacts Division. June. Available at http://www.epa.gov/ttnecas1/regdata/RIAs/PMRIACombinedFile_Bookm arked.pdf. 4 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (U.S. EPA). 2012b. Regulatory Impact Analysis for the Final Revisions to the National Ambient Air Quality Standards for Particulate Matter

. EPA-452/R-12-003. Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards, Health and Environmental Impacts Division. December. Available at http://www.epa.gov/pm/2012/finalria.pdf.***E.O. 12866 Review – Draft – Do Not Cite, Quote, or Release During Review*** Page 17 of 228 Regulated Entities . Categories and entities potentially regulated by this action include: Category NAICS 1 Examples of regulated entities Any industry using a stationary internal combustion engine as defined in the final amendments. 2211 Electric power generation, transmission, or distribution. 622110 Medical and surgical hospitals.

48621 Natural gas transmission.

211111 Crude petroleum and natural gas production. 211112 Natural gas liquids producers. 92811 National security.

1 North American Industry Classification System. This table is not intended to be exhaustive, but rather provides a guide for readers regarding entities likely to be regulated by this action. To determine whether an engine is regulated by this action, owners and operators should examine the applicability criteria of this final rule. For any questions regarding the applicability of this action to a particular entity, consult the person listed in the preceding **FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT**

section. C. Where can I get a copy of this document? In addition to being available in the docket, an electronic copy of this final action will also be available on the Worldwide Web (WWW) through the Technology Transfer Network (TTN). Following signature, a copy of this final action will be posted on the TTN’s policy and guidance page for newly proposed Formatted Table***E.O. 12866 Review – Draft – Do Not Cite, Quote, or Release During Review*** Page 18 of 228 or promulgated rules at the following address: http://www.epa.gov/ttn/oarpg/. The TTN provides information and technology exchange in various areas of air pollution control.

D. Judicial Review Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA, judicial review of this final rule is available only by filing a petition for review in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit by [INSERT DATE 60 DAYS AFTER PUBLICATION IN FEDERAL REGISTER]. Under section 307(d)(7)(B) of the CAA, only an objection to this final rule that was raised with reasonable specificity during the period for public comment can be raised during judicial review. Moreover, under section 307(b)(2) of the CAA, the requirements established by this final rule may not be challenged separately in any civil or criminal proceedings brought by EPA to enforce these requirements. Section 307(d)(7)(B) of the CAA further provides that “[o]nly an objection to a rule or procedure which was raised with reasonable specificity during the period for public comment (including any public hearing) may be raised during judicial review.” This section also provides a mechanism for us to convene a proceeding for reconsideration, “[i]f the person raising an objection can demonstrate to the EPA that it was impracticable to raise such objection within [the period for public comment] or if the grounds for such objection arose after***E.O. 12866 Review – Draft – Do Not Cite, Quote, or Release During Review*** Page 19 of 228 the period for public comment (but within the time specified for judicial review) and if such objection is of central relevance to the outcome of the rule.” Any person seeking to make such a

demonstration to us should submit a Petition for Reconsideration to the Office of the Administrator, U.S. EPA, Room 3000, Ariel Rios Building, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20460, with a copy to both the person(s) listed in the preceding

**FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT**  section, and the Associate General Counsel for the Air and Radiation Law Office, Office of General Counsel (Mail Code 2344A), U.S. EPA, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20460. **II. Summary of Final Amendments**

This action finalizes amendments to the NESHAP for RICE in 40 CFR part 63, subpart ZZZZ. This action also finalizes amendments to the NSPS for stationary engines in 40 CFR part 60, subparts IIII and JJJJ. The NESHAP for stationary RICE to regulate emissions of HAP was developed in several stages. The EPA initially addressed stationary RICE greater than 500 HP located at major sources of HAP emissions in 2004 (69 FR 33473). The EPA addressed new stationary RICE less than or equal to 500 HP located at major sources and new stationary RICE located at area sources in 2008 (73 FR 3568). Most recently, requirements for existing stationary RICE less than or equal to 500 HP located at major sources and existing stationary RICE located at***E.O. 12866 Review – Draft – Do Not Cite, Quote, or Release During Review*** Page 20 of 228 area sources were finalized in 2010 (75 FR 9648 and 75 FR 51570). The EPA is finalizing these amendments to address a number of issues that have been raised by different stakeholders through lawsuits, several petitions for reconsideration of the 2010 RICE NESHAP amendments, and other communications. The EPA is also finalizing revisions to 40 CFR part 60, subparts IIII and JJJJ for consistency with the RICE NESHAP and to make minor

corrections and clarifications. The amendments that the EPA is finalizing in this action are discussed in this section. The changes from the proposal to this final rule are discussed in

section III.

A. Total Hydrocarbon Compliance Demonstration Option The EPA is adding an alternative method of demonstrating compliance with the NESHAP for existing and new stationary 4SRB non-emergency engines greater than 500 HP that are located at major sources of HAP emissions. Under these final amendments, the emission standard remains the same, that is, existing and new stationary 4SRB engines greater than 500 HP and located at major sources are still required to reduce formaldehyde emissions by 76 percent or more or limit the concentration of formaldehyde in the stationary RICE exhaust to 350 parts per billion by volume, dry basis or less at 15 percent oxygen (O 2 ). This final rule adds an alternative compliance demonstration***E.O. 12866 Review – Draft – Do Not Cite, Quote, or Release During Review*** Page 21 of 228 option to the existing method of demonstrating compliance with the formaldehyde percent reduction standard. The current method is to test engines for formaldehyde. The alternative for owners and operators of 4SRB engines meeting a 76 percent or more formaldehyde reduction is to test their engines for THC showing that the engine is achieving at least a 30 percent reduction of THC emissions. Including this optional THC compliance demonstration option reduces the cost of compliance significantly while continuing to achieve the same level of HAP

emission reduction because the emission standards would remain the same. As discussed in the June 7, 2012 , proposal, data provided to EPA indicate that a strong relationship exists between percentage reductions of THC and percentage reductions of formaldehyde (the surrogate for HAP emissions in the NESHAP) on rich burn engines using non-selective catalytic reduction (NSCR). Data analyzed by the EPA indicate that if the NSCR is reducing THC by at least 30 percent from 4SRB engines, formaldehyde emissions are guaranteed to be reduced by at least 76 percent, which is the percentage reduction required for the relevant engines. Indeed, the percentage reduction of formaldehyde is invariably well above the 76 percent level, and is usually above 90 percent. Therefore, the EPA concluded that for SI 4SRB engines using NSCR and meeting the NESHAP by showing a percentage reduction of HAP, it would be appropriate to allow***E.O. 12866 Review – Draft – Do Not Cite, Quote, or Release During Review*** Page 22 of 228 sources to demonstrate compliance with the NESHAP by showing a THC reduction of at least 30 percent. Owners and operators of existing stationary 4SRB engines less than or equal to 500 HP that are required to limit the concentration of formaldehyde in the stationary RICE exhaust to 10.3 parts per million by volume, dry basis (ppmvd) or less at 15 percent O 2 do not have the option to demonstrate compliance using THC and must continue to demonstrate compliance by testing for formaldehyde following the methods and procedures specified in the rule because the EPA could not verify a clear relationship between concentrations of THC and concentrations of formaldehyde in the exhaust from these SI 4SRB engines. Owners and operators opting to use the THC compliance demonstration method must demonstrate compliance by showing that the average reduction of THC is equal to or greater than 30 percent. Owners and operators of 4SRB stationary RICE complying with the requirement to reduce formaldehyde emissions and demonstrating compliance by using the THC compliance demonstration option must conduct performance testing using Method 25A of 40 CFR part 60, appendix A – Determination of Total Gaseous Organic Concentration Using a Flame Ionization Analyzer. Measurements of THC at the inlet and the outlet of the NSCR must be on a dry basis and corrected to 15 percent O 2 or equivalent carbon dioxide content. To correct to 15 percent O 2 ,***E.O. 12866 Review – Draft – Do Not Cite, Quote, or Release During Review*** Page 23 of 228 dry basis, owners and operators must measure oxygen using Method 3, 3A or 3B of 40 CFR part 60, appendix A, or ASTM Method D6522- 00 (2005) and measure moisture using Method 4 of 40 CFR part 60, appendix A, or Test Method 320 of 40 CFR part 63, appendix A, or ASTM D6348-03. Because owners and operators are complying with a percent reduction requirement, the method used must be suitable for the entire range of emissions since pre and post-catalyst emissions must be measured. Method 25A is capable of measuring emissions down to 5 ppmv and is, therefore, an appropriate method for measuring THC emissions for compliance demonstration purposes. The EPA is allowing sources the option to meet a minimum THC percent reduction of 30 percent by using Method 25A of 40 CFR part 60, appendix A to demonstrate compliance with the formaldehyde percent reduction in 40 CFR part 63, subpart ZZZZ. B. Emergency Demand Response and Reliability The EPA is finalizing certain revisions to the proposal regarding use of existing engines for emergency demand response and system reliability. Following is a summary of the prior requirements for these engines, including those in the 2010 regulation, a discussion of the information and input the EPA received in response to the proposal, and a description of the provisions being finalized in this action. Existing emergency engines less than or equal to 500 HP located at major sources of HAP and existing emergency engines***E.O. 12866 Review – Draft – Do Not Cite, Quote, or Release During Review*** Page 24 of 228 located at area sources of HAP were not regulated under the RICE NESHAP rulemakings finalized in 2004 and 2008. They could operate uncontrolled for an unlimited amount of time. The 2010 RICE NESHAP rulemaking for the first time established requirements for these existing emergency engines, requiring affected engines to comply by May 3, 2013, for stationary CI RICE and October 19, 2013, for stationary SI RICE. Under the RICE NESHAP requirements originally finalized in 2010, these existing emergency stationary engines must limit operation to

situations like blackouts and floods and to a maximum of 100 hours per year for other specified operations beginning with the applicable compliance date in 2013 for the engine. The limitation of 100 hours per year included maintenance checks and readiness testing of the engine, as well as a limit of 15 hours per year for use as part of a demand response program if the regional transmission organization or equivalent balancing authority and transmission operator has determined there are emergency conditions that could lead to a potential electrical blackout, such as unusually low frequency, equipment overload, capacity or energy deficiency, or unacceptable voltage level. Under the 2010 regulation, existing emergency engines were required to meet management practice standards based on proper operation and maintenance of the engine; meeting these standards***E.O. 12866 Review – Draft – Do Not Cite, Quote, or Release During Review*** Page 25 of 228 would not require installation of aftertreatment to control

emissions. Soon after the 2010 rule was final, the EPA received petitions for reconsideration of the 15-hour limitation for emergency demand response that was finalized in the 2010 rule. According to one petition, the 15-hour limit, while usually adequate to cover the limited hours in which these engines are expected to be called upon, would not be sufficient to allow these emergency engines to participate in emergency demand response programs since some regional transmission organizations and independent system operators require engines be available for more than 15 hours in order to meet emergency demand response situations. For example, PJM’s Emergency Load Response Program requires that emergency engines guarantee that they will be available for 60 hours per year. By contrast, another petition asked EPA to eliminate the emergency demand response provision because of the adverse effects that the petitioner

believes would result from increased emissions from these engines. The EPA received other comments that addressed the types of situations in which engines are called upon for emergency demand response and system reliability. The EPA believes that the emergency demand response programs that exist across the country are important programs that protect the reliability and stability of the national***E.O. 12866 Review – Draft – Do Not Cite, Quote, or Release During Review*** Page 26 of 228 electric service grid. The use of stationary emergency engines as part of emergency demand response programs can help prevent grid failure or blackouts, by allowing these engines to be used for limited hours in specific circumstances of grid instability prior to the occurrence of blackouts. A standard that requires owners and operators of stationary emergency engines that participate in emergency demand response programs to apply aftertreatment could make it economically infeasible for these engines to participate in these programs, impairing the ability of regional transmission organizations and independent system operators to use these relatively small, quick-starting and reliable sources of energy to protect the reliability of their systems in times of critical need. Information provided by commenters on the proposal indicates that these emergency demand response events are rarely called. 5 The limited circumstances specified in the final rule for operation of stationary emergency engines for emergency demand response purposes include periods during which the Reliability Coordinator, or other authorized entity as determined by the Reliability Coordinator, has declared an Energy Emergency Alert (EEA) Level 2 as defined in the North American Electric Reliability Corporation (NERC) Reliability Standard EOP-002-3,

5 See document number EPA-HQ-OAR-2008-0708-1142 in the rulemaking docket.***E.O. 12866 Review – Draft – Do Not Cite, Quote, or Release During Review*** Page 27 of 228 Capacity and Energy Emergency, and during periods where there is a deviation of voltage or frequency of 5 percent or more below standard voltage or frequency. During EEA Level 2 alerts there is insufficient energy supply and a true potential for electrical blackouts. System operators must call on all available resources during EEA Level 2 alerts in order to stabilize the grid to prevent failure. Therefore, this situation is a good indicator of severe instability on the system, which the EPA believes is appropriately considered an emergency situation. Consistent normal voltage provided by the utility is often called power quality and is an important factor in local electric system reliability. Reliability of the system requires electricity being provided at a normal expected voltage. The

American National Standards Institute standard C84.1-1989 defines the maximum allowable voltage sag at below 5 percent. On the local distribution level local voltage levels are therefore important and a 5 percent or more change in the normal voltage or frequency is substantial and an indication that additional resources are needed to ensure local distribution system reliability. In addition to the circumstances described above, the EPA

also received comments on other situations where the local transmission and distribution system operator has determined

that there are conditions that could lead to a blackout for the***E.O. 12866 Review – Draft – Do Not Cite, Quote, or Release During Review*** Page 28 of 228 local area where the ready availability of emergency engines is critical to system reliability. These include situations where:

 The engine is dispatched by the local balancing authority or local transmission and distribution system operator.

 The dispatch is intended to mitigate local transmission and/or distribution limitations so as to avert potential voltage collapse or line overloads that could lead to the interruption of power supply in a local area or region.

 The dispatch follows reliability, emergency operation or similar protocols that follow specific NERC, regional, state, public utility commission or local standards or guidelines. The EPA believes the operation of emergency engines in these

situations should be addressed in the final rule as well. Therefore, based on the EPA’s review of the petitions and comments that the EPA has received with respect to emergency demand response and system reliability, the EPA has concluded that it is appropriate to revise the provisions for stationary engines used in these limited circumstances. The provisions the EPA is amending are in §§63.6640(f) and 63.6675 of 40 CFR part 63, subpart ZZZZ. The final amendments to those sections specify that owners and operators of stationary emergency RICE can operate their engines as part of an emergency demand response program within the 100 hours already provided for operation for***E.O. 12866 Review – Draft – Do Not Cite, Quote, or Release During Review*** Page 29 of 228 maintenance and testing. Owners and operators of stationary emergency engines can operate for up to 100 hours per year for emergency demand response and system reliability during periods in which the Reliability Coordinator, or other authorized entity as determined by the Reliability Coordinator, has declared an EEA Level 2 as defined in the NERC Reliability Standard EOP-002- 3, Capacity and Energy Emergency, and during periods where there is a deviation of voltage or frequency of 5 percent or greater below standard voltage or frequency. In addition, existing emergency stationary RICE at area sources of HAP can operate for up to 50 hours per year if all of the following conditions are

met:

 The engine is dispatched by the local balancing authority or local transmission and distribution system operator.

 The dispatch is intended to mitigate local transmission and/or distribution limitations so as to avert potential voltage collapse or line overloads that could lead to the interruption of power supply in a local area or region.

 The dispatch follows reliability, emergency operation or similar protocols that follow specific NERC, regional, state, public utility commission or local standards or guidelines.***E.O. 12866 Review – Draft – Do Not Cite, Quote, or Release During Review*** Page 30 of 228

 The owner or operator has a pre-existing plan that contemplates the engine’s operation under the circumstances described above; and

 The owner or operator identifies and records the specific NERC, regional, state, public utility commission or local standards or guidelines that are being followed for dispatching the engine. The local balancing authority or local transmission and distribution system operator may keep these records on behalf of the engine owner or operator. For all engines operating to satisfy emergency demand response or system reliability under the circumstances described above, the hours spent for emergency demand response operation and local system reliability are added to the hours spent for maintenance and testing purposes and are counted towards the limit of 100 hours per year. If the total time spent for maintenance and testing, emergency demand response, and system reliability operation exceeds 100 hours per year, the engine will not be considered an emergency engine under this subpart and will need to meet all requirements for non-emergency engines. As noted above, the EPA received comments expressing concerns about the emissions from emergency engines, noting that the engines are likely to be dispatched on days when energy***E.O. 12866 Review – Draft – Do Not Cite, Quote, or Release During Review*** Page 31 of 228 demand is high, which often coincides with days when air quality is poor. While the EPA is sensitive to these concerns, the availability of these engines for a more tailored response to emergencies may be preferable in terms of air quality impacts than relying on other generation, including coal-fired spinning reserve generation. After consideration of the concerns raised in the comments, the EPA is finalizing provisions that require stationary emergency CI RICE with a site rating of more than 100 brake HP and a displacement of less than 30 liters per cylinder that operate or are contractually obligated to be available for more than 15 hours per year (up to a maximum of 100 hours per year) for emergency demand response, or that operate for local system reliability, to use diesel fuel meeting the specifications of 40 CFR 80.510(b) beginning January 1, 2015, except that any existing diesel fuel purchased (or otherwise obtained) prior to January 1, 2015, may be used until depleted. The specifications of 40 CFR 80.510(b) require that diesel fuel have a maximum sulfur content of 15 ppm and either a minimum

cetane index of 40 or a maximum aromatic content of 35 volume percent; this fuel is referred to as “ultra low sulfur diesel fuel” (ULSD). This emission reduction requirement was not part of the original 2010 rulemaking. Although the EPA does not have information specifying the percentage of existing stationary emergency CI engines currently using residual fuel oil or non-***E.O. 12866 Review – Draft – Do Not Cite, Quote, or Release During Review*** Page 32 of 228 ULSD distillate fuel, the most recent U.S. Energy Information

Administration data available for sales of distillate and

residual fuel oil to end users 6 show that significant amounts of non-ULSD are still being purchased by end users that typically operate stationary combustion sources, including stationary emergency CI engines. For example, in the category of Commercial End Use, sales data for the year 2011 show that only 56 percent

of the total distillate and residual fuel oil sold was ULSD. The data provided for Electric Power End Use show that 57 percent of total fuel sold was residual fuel oil. For Industrial End Use, the percentage of total fuel that was residual fuel oil was 26 percent. The EPA believes that requiring cleaner fuel for these stationary emergency CI engines will significantly limit or reduce the emissions of regulated air pollutants emitted from these engines, further protecting public health and the environment. Information provided to EPA by commenters 7 showed that the use of ULSD will significantly reduce emissions of air toxics, including metallic HAP (e.g., nickel, zinc, lead) and

benzene. In addition to the fuel requirement, owners and operators of stationary emergency CI RICE larger than 100 HP that operate

6 U.S. Energy Information Administration. Distillate Fuel Oil and Kerosene Sales by End Use. Available at http://www.eia.gov/dnav/pet/pet_cons_821use_dcu_nus_a.htm. 7 See document number EPA-HQ-OAR-2008-0708-1459 in the rulemaking docket.***E.O. 12866 Review – Draft – Do Not Cite, Quote, or Release During Review*** Page 33 of 228 or are contractually obligated to be available for more than 15 hours per year (up to a maximum of 100 hours per year) for emergency demand response must report the dates and times the engines operate for emergency demand response annually to the EPA, beginning with operation during the 2015 calendar year. Owners and operators of these engines are also required to report the dates, times and situations that the engines operate to mitigate local transmission and/or distribution limitations annually to the EPA, beginning with operation during the 2015 calendar year. This information is necessary to determine whether these engines are operating in compliance with the regulations and will assist the EPA in assessing the impacts of the emissions from these engines. The EPA is adding these requirements beginning in January, 2015, rather than upon initial implementation of the NESHAP for existing engines in May or October of 2013, to provide sources with appropriate lead time to institute these new requirements and make any physical adjustments to engines and other facilities like tanks or other containment structures, as well as any needed adjustments to contracts and other business activities, that may be necessitated by these new requirements. The EPA is also amending the NSPS for stationary CI and SI engines in 40 CFR part 60, subparts IIII and JJJJ, respectively, to provide the same limitation for stationary emergency engines***E.O. 12866 Review – Draft – Do Not Cite, Quote, or Release During Review*** Page 34 of 228 for emergency demand response and system reliability operation as for engines subject to the RICE NESHAP. The NSPS regulations currently do not include such a provision for emergency demand response or system reliability operation; the issue was not raised during the original promulgation of the NSPS. The EPA is adding an emergency demand response and system reliability provision under the NSPS regulations in these final amendments. The EPA is revising the existing language in §§60.4211(f) and 60.4219 of 40 CFR part 60, subpart IIII, and §§60.4243(d) and 60.4248 of 40 CFR part 60, subpart JJJJ, to specify that emergency engines must limit operation for engine maintenance and testing and emergency demand response to a maximum of 100 hours per year; 50 of the 100 hours may be used to operate to mitigate local reliability issues, as discussed previously for

the RICE NESHAP. The EPA is also finalizing amendments to the NSPS regulations that require owners and operators of stationary emergency engines larger than 100 HP that operate or are contractually obligated to be available for more than 15 hours per year (up to a maximum of 100 hours per year) for emergency demand response to report the dates and times the engines operated for emergency demand response annually to the EPA, beginning with operation during the 2015 calendar year. Owners and operators of these engines are also required to report the***E.O. 12866 Review – Draft – Do Not Cite, Quote, or Release During Review*** Page 35 of 228 dates, times and situations that the engines operate to mitigate local transmission and/or distribution limitations annually to the EPA, beginning with operation during the 2015 calendar year. Emergency engines subject to 40 CFR part 60, subpart IIII are already required by subpart IIII to use diesel fuel that meets the requirements of 40 CFR 80.510(b). The 2010 regulation specified that existing emergency engines at area sources of HAP that are residential, commercial, or institutional facilities were not subject to the RICE NESHAP requirements as long as the engines were limited to no more than 15 hours per year for emergency demand response. The EPA is specifying in the final rule that existing emergency engines at area sources of HAP that are residential, commercial, or institutional facilities are subject to the applicable requirements for stationary emergency engines in the RICE NESHAP if they operate or are contractually obligated to be available for more than 15 hours per year (up to a maximum of 100 hours per year) for emergency demand response, or they operate to mitigate local transmission and/or distribution limitations. Information provided by commenters on the 2010 regulation and the amendments proposed in June 2012 indicates that these engines typically operate less than 15 hours per year for emergency demand response.***E.O. 12866 Review – Draft – Do Not Cite, Quote, or Release During Review*** Page 36 of 228 For stationary emergency engines above 500 HP at major sources of HAP that were installed before June 12, 2006, prior to these final amendments, there was no emergency demand response provision and there was no time limit on the use of emergency engines for routine testing and maintenance in §63.6640(f)(2)(ii). Those engines were not the focus of the 2010 RICE NESHAP amendments; therefore, the EPA did not make any changes to the requirements for those engines as part of the 2010 amendments. For consistency, the EPA is now also revising 40 CFR part 63, subpart ZZZZ to require owners and operators of stationary emergency engines above 500 HP at major sources of HAP installed prior to June 12, 2006, to limit operation of their engines for maintenance and testing and emergency demand response program to a total of 100 hours per year. These engines would also be required to use diesel fuel meeting the specifications of 40 CFR 80.510(b) beginning January 1, 2015, however, if the engine operates or is contractually obligated to be available for more than 15 hours per year. Any existing diesel fuel purchased (or otherwise obtained) prior to January 1, 2015 may be used until depleted. In addition to the fuel requirement, owners and operators of these engines must report the dates and times the engines operate for emergency demand response annually to the EPA, beginning with operation during the 2015 calendar year.***E.O. 12866 Review – Draft – Do Not Cite, Quote, or Release During Review*** Page 37 of 228 More detail regarding the public comments regarding emergency demand response and the EPA’s responses can be found in the Response to Public Comments document available in the rulemaking docket. C. Peak Shaving In the June 7, 2012, proposal, the EPA proposed a temporary provision for existing stationary emergency engines located at area sources to apply the 50 hours per year that is allowedunder §63.6640(f) for non-emergency operation towards any nonemergency operation, including peak shaving. The peak shaving provision was proposed to expire in April 2017. As discussed further in section III.B, the EPA is not finalizing the proposed temporary 50-hour provision for existing stationary emergency engines located at area sources engaged in peak shaving and other non-emergency use as part of a financial arrangement with another entity. However, in consideration of the short time between this final rule and the May 3, 2013, or October 19, 2013, compliance dates for affected sources, this final rule includes a provision limiting the use of existing stationary emergency engines located at area sources to 50 hours per year prior to May 3, 2014, for peak shaving or non-emergency demand response to generate income for a facility, or to otherwise supply power as part of a financial arrangement with another entity if the engines are operated as part of a peak shaving***E.O. 12866 Review – Draft – Do Not Cite, Quote, or Release During Review*** Page 38 of 228 (load management) program with the local distribution system operator and the power is provided only to the facility itself or to support the local distribution system. This extension provides additional time so that these sources that wish to engage in peak shaving can come into compliance with the applicable requirements for non-emergency engines. D. Non-Emergency Stationary SI RICE Greater than 500 HP Located

at Area Sources The EPA is finalizing amendments to the requirements that apply to existing stationary non-emergency 4-stroke SI RICE greater than 500 HP located at area sources of HAP emissions, which are generally natural gas fired engines. The EPA is creating a subcategory for existing spark ignition engines located in sparsely populated areas. Engines located in remote areas that are not close to significant human activity may be difficult to access, may not have electricity or communications, and may be unmanned most of the time. The costs of the emission controls, testing, and continuous monitoring requirements may be unreasonable when compared to the HAP emission reductions that would be achieved, considering that the engines are in sparsely populated areas. Moreover, the location of these engines is such that there would be limited public exposure to the emissions. The EPA believes that establishing a subcategory for SI engines at area sources of HAP located in***E.O. 12866 Review – Draft – Do Not Cite, Quote, or Release During Review*** Page 39 of 228 sparsely populated areas accomplishes the agency’s goals and is adequate in protecting public health. The EPA is creating this subcategory using criteria based on the existing DOT classification system for natural gas pipelines. This system classifies locations based on their distance to natural gas pipelines covered by the Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration regulations. The DOT system defines a class location unit as an onshore area that extends 220 yards or 200 meters on either side of the centerline of any continuous 1-mile (1.6 kilometers) length of natural gas pipeline. The DOT approach further classifies pipeline locations into Class 1 through Class 4 locations based on the number of buildings intended for human occupancy. A Class 1 location is defined as an offshore area or any class location unit that has 10 or fewer buildings intended for human occupancy. The DOT classification system also has special provisions for locations where buildings with four or more stories above ground are prevalent and locations that lie within 100 yards (91 meters) of either a building or a small, well-defined outside area (such as a playground, recreation area, outdoor theater, or other place of public assembly) that is occupied by 20 or more persons on at least 5 days a week for 10 weeks in any 12-month period. To be considered remote under this final rule, a source on a pipeline could not fall under these special provisions and, in addition,***E.O. 12866 Review – Draft – Do Not Cite, Quote, or Release During Review*** Page 40 of 228 must be in a Class 1 location. For those engines not associated with pipelines, the EPA is using similar criteria. An engine would be considered to be in sparsely populated areas if within 0.25 mile radius of the engine there are 5 or fewer buildings intended for human occupancy. Owners and operators of existing stationary non-emergency 4-stroke lean burn (4SLB) and 4SRB RICE greater than 500 HP at area sources that are in sparsely populated areas as described above would be required to perform the following:

 Change oil and filter every 2,160 hours of operation or annually, whichever comes first;

 Inspect spark plugs every 2,160 hours of operation or annually, whichever comes first, and replace as necessary;

and

 Inspect all hoses and belts every 2,160 hours of operation or annually, whichever comes first, and replace as

necessary. Sources have the option to use an oil analysis program as described in §63.6625(i) of the rule in order to extend the specified oil change requirement. The oil analysis must be performed at the same frequency specified for changing the oil in Table 2d of the rule. The analysis program must at a minimum analyze the following three parameters: Total Acid Number, viscosity, and percent water content. The condemning limits for***E.O. 12866 Review – Draft – Do Not Cite, Quote, or Release During Review*** Page 41 of 228 these parameters are as follows: Total Acid Number increases by more than 3.0 milligrams of potassium hydroxide per gram from Total Acid Number of the oil when new; viscosity of the oil has changed by more than 20 percent from the viscosity of the oil when new; or percent water content (by volume) is greater than 0.5. If none of these condemning limits are exceeded, the engine owner or operator is not required to change the oil. If any of the limits are exceeded, the engine owner or operator must change the oil within 2 business days of receiving the results of the analysis; if the engine is not in operation when the results of the analysis are received, the engine owner or operator must change the oil within 2 business days or before commencing operation, whichever is later. The owner or operator must keep records of the parameters that are analyzed as part of the program, the results of the analysis, and the oil changes for the engine. The analysis program must be part of the maintenance plan for the engine. Owners and operators of existing stationary 4SLB and 4SRB area source engines above 500 HP in sparsely populated areas would also have to operate and maintain the stationary RICE and aftertreatment control device (if any) according to the manufacturer's emission-related written instructions or develop their own maintenance plan, which must provide to the extent practicable for the maintenance and operation of the engine in a***E.O. 12866 Review – Draft – Do Not Cite, Quote, or Release During Review*** Page 42 of 228 manner consistent with good air pollution control practice for minimizing emissions. Owners and operators of engines in sparsely populated areas would have to conduct a review of the surrounding area every 12 months to determine if the nearby population has changed. If the engine no longer meets the criteria for a sparsely populated area, the owner and operator must within 1 year comply with the emission standards specified below for populated areas. For engines in populated areas, i.e., existing stationary 4SLB and 4SRB non-emergency engines greater than 500 HP at area sources that are located on DOT Class 2 through Class 4 pipeline segments or, for engines not associated with pipelines, that do not meet the 0.25 mile radius with 5 or less buildings criteria, the EPA is revising the requirements that were finalized in the 2010 rule. The EPA is adopting an equipment standard requiring the installation of a catalyst to reduce HAP emissions. Owners and operators of existing area source 4SLB non-emergency engines greater than 500 HP in populated areas would be required to install an oxidation catalyst. Owners and operators of existing area source 4SRB non-emergency engines greater than 500 HP in populated areas would be required to install NSCR. Owners and operators must conduct an initial test to demonstrate that the engine achieves at least a 93 percent reduction in CO emissions or a CO concentration level of 47 ppmvd at 15 percent O 2 , if the***E.O. 12866 Review – Draft – Do Not Cite, Quote, or Release During Review*** Page 43 of 228 engine is a 4SLB engine. Similarly, owners and operators must conduct an initial performance test to demonstrate that the engine achieves at least either a 75 percent CO reduction, a 30 percent THC reduction, or a CO concentration level of 270 ppmvd at 15 percent O 2 if the engine is a 4SRB engine. The initial test

must consist of three test runs. Each test run must be of at least 15 minute duration, except that each test run conducted using appendix A to 40 CFR part 63, subpart ZZZZ must consist of one measurement cycle as defined by the method and include at least 2 minutes of test data phase measurement. To measure CO, emission sources must use the CO methods already specified in subpart ZZZZ, or appendix A to 40 CFR part 63, subpart ZZZZ. The THC testing must be conducted using EPA Method 25A. The owner or operator of both engine types must also use a high temperature shutdown device that detects if the catalyst inlet temperature is too high, or, alternatively, the owner or operator can monitor the catalyst inlet temperature continuously and maintain the temperature within the range specified in the rule. For 4SLB engines the catalyst inlet temperature must remain at or above 450°F and at or below 1,350°F. For 4SRB engines the temperature must be greater than or equal to 750°F and less than or equal to 1,250°F at the catalyst inlet. Owners and operators must in addition to the initial performance test conduct annual checks of the catalyst to ensure***E.O. 12866 Review – Draft – Do Not Cite, Quote, or Release During Review*** Page 44 of 228 proper catalyst activity. The annual check of the catalyst must at a minimum consist of one 15-minute run using the methods discussed above, except that each test run conducted using appendix A to 40 CFR part 63, subpart ZZZZ must consist of one measurement cycle as defined by the method and include at least 2 minutes of test data phase measurement. Owners and operators of 4SLB engines must demonstrate during the catalyst activity test that the catalyst achieves at least a 93 percent reduction in CO emissions or that the engine exhaust CO emissions are no more than 47 ppmvd at 15 percent O 2 . Owners and operators of 4SRB engines must demonstrate during the catalyst activity check that their catalyst is reducing CO emissions by 75 percent or more, the CO concentration level at the engine exhaust is less than or equal to 270 ppmvd at 15 percent O 2, or THC emissions are being reduced by at least 30 percent. If the emissions from the engine do not exceed the levels required for the initial test or annual checks of the catalyst, then the catalyst is considered to be working properly. If the emissions exceed the specified pollutant levels in the rule, the exceedance(s) is/are not considered a violation, but the owner or operator would be required to shut down the engine and take appropriate corrective action (e.g., repairs, clean or replace the catalyst, as appropriate). A follow-up test must be conducted within 7 days of the engine being started up again to***E.O. 12866 Review – Draft – Do Not Cite, Quote, or Release During Review*** Page 45 of 228 demonstrate that the emission levels are being met. If the retest shows that the emissions continue to exceed the specified levels, the stationary RICE must again be shut down as soon as safely possible, and the engine may not operate, except for purposes of start-up and testing, until the owner/operator demonstrates through testing that the emissions do not exceed the levels specified. E. Stationary CI RICE Certified to Tier Standards The EPA is amending the requirements for any stationary CI engine certified to the Tier 3 standards in 40 CFR part 89 (Tier 2 for engines above 560 kilowatt (kW)) located at an area source and installed before June 12, 2006. The EPA is finalizing amendments to specify that any existing certified Tier 3 (Tier 2 for engines above 560 kW) CI engine that was installed before June 12, 2006, is in compliance with the RICE NESHAP. This amendment includes any existing stationary Tier 3 (Tier 2 for engines above 560 kW) certified CI engine located at an area source of HAP emissions. Without these amendments, Tier 3 engines, which were built to meet stringent emission standards, would not be able to comply with the applicable RICE NESHAP emission standards for existing engines without further testing and monitoring, and possible retrofit with further controls, due to differences in the emission standards and testing protocols in the RICE NESHAP versus the Tier 3 standards in 40 CFR part***E.O. 12866 Review – Draft – Do Not Cite, Quote, or Release During Review*** Page 46 of 228 89. However, an identical engine certified to the Tier 3 standards (or Tier 2 standards for engines above 560 kW) in 40 CFR part 89 that was installed after June 12, 2006, would not have to be retrofit in order to comply with the NESHAP. The EPA believes that the Tier 3 standards (Tier 2 for engines above 560 kW) are technologically stringent regulations and believes it is unnecessary to require further regulation of engines meeting

these standards. The EPA is also amending the requirements for existing stationary CI engines that are certified to the Tier 1 and Tier 2 standards in 40 CFR part 89, located at area sources of HAP, greater than 300 HP and subject to a state or local rule that requires the engine to be replaced. The EPA does not think it is appropriate to require emission controls on a stationary CI engine that is going to be retired only a short time after the rule goes into effect. These engines (equipped with aftertreatment) could end up being in operation for less than 2 years or at most only 5 years before having to be replaced with a certified Tier 4 engine. It would not be reasonable to require the engine owner to invest in costly controls and monitoring equipment for an engine that will be replaced shortly after the installation of the controls. Consequently, the EPA is allowing these engines to meet management practices from the applicable May 3, 2013, compliance date until January 1, 2015, or 12 years***E.O. 12866 Review – Draft – Do Not Cite, Quote, or Release During Review*** Page 47 of 228 after installation date (whichever is later), but not later than June 1, 2018, after which time the CO emission standards in Table 2d of 40 CFR part 63, subpart ZZZZ) apply. The management practices include requirements for when to inspect and replace the engine oil and filter, air cleaner, hoses and belts. The complete details of which management practices are required are shown in Table 2d of the rule. Owners and operators of these existing stationary CI engines located at area sources of HAP emissions that intend to meet management practices rather than the emission limits prior to January 1, 2015, or 12 years after installation date, but not later than June 1, 2018, must submit a notification by March 3, 2013, stating that they intend to use this provision and identifying the state or local regulation that the engine is subject to.

F. Definition for Remote Areas of Alaska The RICE NESHAP amendments finalized in 2010 specified less stringent requirements for existing non-emergency CI engines at

area sources located in remote areas of Alaska. Remote areas are defined under the 2010 rule as those not accessible by the FAHS. In this action, the EPA is expanding the definition of remote areas of Alaska to extend beyond areas that are not accessible by the FAHS. The EPA is expanding the current definition because some areas that are accessible by the FAHS face the same challenges as areas that are not accessible, including high***E.O. 12866 Review – Draft – Do Not Cite, Quote, or Release During Review*** Page 48 of 228 energy costs, extreme weather conditions, lengthy travel times, inaccessibility, and very low population density. Many of these areas are not connected to the electric grid and rely on back up diesel generation to support fluctuating renewable energy systems. The energy supply system is another area that is particularly different in Alaska compared to the rest of the country where the majority of customers are connected to the grid. These final amendments specify that existing stationary CI engines at area sources of HAP in areas of Alaska that are accessible by the FAHS and that meet all of the following criteria will also be considered remote and subject to management practices under the rule:

 The stationary CI engine is located in an area not connected to the Alaska Railbelt Grid,

 At least 10 percent of the power generated by the engine per year is used for residential purposes, and

 The generating capacity of the area source is less than 12 MW, or the engine is used exclusively for backup power for renewable energy. The EPA is limiting the remote classification to engines that are used at least partially for residential purposes, where the impact of higher energy costs is of greatest concern. The

classification is further limited to sources that are used infrequently as backup for renewable power, or that are at***E.O. 12866 Review – Draft – Do Not Cite, Quote, or Release During Review*** Page 49 of 228 smaller capacity facilities, which are generally in more sparsely populated areas.

G. Requirements for Offshore Vessels The EPA is revising the requirements in the RICE NESHAP for existing non-emergency CI RICE greater than 300 HP on offshore vessels that are area sources of HAP. Engines on vessels on the OCS in certain circumstances become subject to the provisions of the RICE NESHAP as a result of the operation of the OCS regulations at 40 CFR part 55. The rationale for this revision is discussed further in section III.D. The EPA is finalizing thefollowing management practice requirements for existing nonemergency CI RICE greater than 300 HP on offshore vessels that

are area sources of HAP:

 change oil every 1,000 hours of operation or annually, whichever comes first, except that sources can extend the period for changing the oil if the oil is part of an oil analysis program as discussed below and the condemning limits are not exceeded;

 inspect and clean air filters every 750 hours of operation or annually, whichever comes first, and replace as

necessary;

 inspect fuel filters and belts, if installed, every 750 hours of operation or annually, whichever comes first, and replace as necessary; and Formatted: Underline***E.O. 12866 Review – Draft – Do Not Cite, Quote, or Release During Review*** Page 50 of 228

 inspect all flexible hoses every 1,000 hours of operation or annually, whichever comes first, and replace as

necessary. These sources may use an oil analysis program in order to extend the specified oil change requirement. The analysis program must at a minimum analyze the following three parameters: Total Base Number, viscosity and percent water content. The analysis must be conducted at the same frequency specified for changing the engine oil. If the condemning limits provided below are not exceeded, the engine owner or operator is not required to change the oil. If any of the condemning limits are exceeded, the engine owner or operator must change the oil within two business days or before continuing to use the engine, whichever is later. The condemning limits are as follows:

 Total Base Number is less than 30 percent of the Total Base Number of the oil when new; or

 viscosity of the oil has changed by more than 20 percent from the viscosity of the oil when new; or

 percent water content (by volume) is greater than 0.5. Owners and operators of these existing stationary CI RICE must develop a maintenance plan that specifies how the management practices will be met and keep records to demonstrate that the required management practices are being met.

H. Miscellaneous Corrections and Revisions***E.O. 12866 Review – Draft – Do Not Cite, Quote, or Release During Review*** Page 51 of 228 The EPA is making some minor corrections and clarifications to the stationary engine rules to address miscellaneous issues.

The revisions are as follows:

 Revising Tables 1b and 2b of 40 CFR part 63, subpart ZZZZ to correct language requiring the pressure drop to be at plus or minus 10 percent of 100 percent load for all engines. The engines that were regulated in 2010 are not subject to the load requirements and therefore the EPA is correcting these tables to make this clear.

 Adding a footnote to Table 1b of 40 CFR part 63, subpart ZZZZ stating that sources can petition the Administrator for a different temperature range consistent with Table 2b

of the rule.

 Correcting rows 8 and 10 in Table 2d of 40 CFR part 63, subpart ZZZZ to indicate that the requirements apply to non-emergency, non-black start stationary RICE greater than 500 HP that are 4SLB and 4SRB that operate more than 24 hours per year, as intended in the original rule.

 Revising the language in §63.6625(b) of 40 CFR part 63, subpart ZZZZ that states “...in paragraphs (b)(1) through (5) of this section” to “in paragraphs (b)(1) through (6)

of this section.”***E.O. 12866 Review – Draft – Do Not Cite, Quote, or Release During Review*** Page 52 of 228

 Changing Tables 2c and 2d of 40 CFR part 63, subpart ZZZZ, where it currently specifies to inspect air cleaner, to also specify that it must be replaced as necessary.

 Revising §63.6620(b) of 40 CFR part 63, subpart ZZZZ to indicate that testing must be conducted within plus or minus 10 percent of 100 percent load for stationary RICE greater than 500 HP located at a major source (except existing non-emergency CI stationary RICE greater than 500 HP located at a major source) that are subject to testing.

 Specifying that, as was intended in the rule adding these requirements, the operating limitations (pressure drop and catalyst inlet temperature) in Tables 1b and 2b of 40 CFR part 63, subpart ZZZZ do not have to be met during startup.

 For consistency, and as provided in the original RICE NESHAP for other stationary RICE, clarifying in 40 CFR part 63, subpart ZZZZ that the existing stationary RICE regulated in 2010 (i.e., engines constructed before June 12, 2006, that are less than or equal to 500 HP located at major sources or engines located at area sources) must burn landfill or digester gas equivalent to 10 percent or more of the gross heat input on an annual basis in order to qualify as a landfill or digester gas engine under the

rule.***E.O. 12866 Review – Draft – Do Not Cite, Quote, or Release During Review*** Page 53 of 228

 Clarifying §60.4207(b) of 40 CFR part 60, subpart IIII to specify that owners and operators of stationary CI engines less than 30 liters per cylinder that are subject to the subpart that use diesel fuel must use diesel fuel that meets the requirements of 40 CFR 80.510(b), except owners and operators may use up any diesel fuel acquired prior to October 1, 2010, that does not meet the requirements of 40 CFR 80.510(b) for nonroad diesel fuel.

 Adding appendix A to 40 CFR part 63, subpart ZZZZ, which includes procedures that can be used for measuring CO emissions from existing stationary 4SLB and 4SRB stationary

RICE above 500 HP located at area sources of HAP that are complying with the emission limits in Table 2d of 40 CFR part 63, subpart ZZZZ.

 Reinstating the footnotes for Table 2 of 40 CFR part 60, subpart JJJJ. The footnotes were inadvertently removed when the rule was amended on June 28, 2011 (76 FR 37954).

 Adding “part 60” in Table 4 of the NESHAP, in row 2 where it refers to 40 CFR appendix A.

 Clarifying in §63.6625(a) of 40 CFR part 63, subpart ZZZZ that a continuous emission monitoring system is only required to be installed at the outlet of the control***E.O. 12866 Review – Draft – Do Not Cite, Quote, or Release During Review*** Page 54 of 228 device for engines that are complying with the requirement

to limit the concentration of CO.

 Adding definitions of terms used in Equation 4 of §63.6620 of 40 CFR part 63, subpart ZZZZ.

 Clarifying that, as was intended in the rule adding these requirements, all of the standards for stationary SI RICE in §60.4231(b) of 40 CFR part 60, subpart JJJJ are for stationary SI RICE that use gasoline.

 Clarifying that, as was intended in the rule adding these requirements, all of the standards for stationary SI RICE in §60.4231(c) of 40 CFR part 60, subpart JJJJ are for stationary SI RICE that are rich burn engines that use liquified petroleum gas (LPG).

 Clarifying that, as was intended in the rule adding these requirements, all of the standards for stationary SI RICE in §60.4231(d) of 40 CFR part 60, subpart JJJJ are for stationary SI RICE that are not gasoline engines or rich burn engines that use LPG.

 Clarifying in §63.6625(b)(1) and the entries for §63.8(c)(1)(i) and (iii) in Table 8 of 40 CFR part 63, subpart ZZZZ that a startup, shutdown, and malfunction plan is not required for a continuous parameter monitoring system.***E.O. 12866 Review – Draft – Do Not Cite, Quote, or Release During Review*** Page 55 of 228

 Clarifying in the entry for §63.10(b)(1) in Table 8 of 40 CFR part 63, subpart ZZZZ that the most recent two years of

data do not have to be retained on site.

 Revising footnote 2 of Table 2c and footnote 1 of Table 2d of 40 CFR part 63, subpart ZZZZ to include a reference to §63.6625(j), as was intended in the rule addressing these requirements. **III. Summary of Significant Changes Since Proposal** A. Emergency Demand Response and Reliability The EPA proposed to limit operation of emergency stationary RICE as part of an emergency demand response program to within the 100 hours per year that is already permitted for maintenance and testing of the engines. The EPA proposed that owners and operators of stationary emergency engines could operate the engines for emergency demand response when the Reliability Coordinator, or other authorized entity as determined by the Reliability Coordinator, has declared an EEA Level 2 as defined in the NERC Reliability Standard EOP-002-3, Capacity and Energy Emergencies, plus during periods where there is a deviation of voltage or frequency of 5 percent or more below standard voltage or frequency. After considering public comments received on the proposed rule, the EPA is finalizing the proposed amendment to limit operation for maintenance and testing and emergency demand response to no more than 100 hours per year.***E.O. 12866 Review – Draft – Do Not Cite, Quote, or Release During Review*** Page 56 of 228 The EPA received some comments in support of the provision for emergency demand response operation, while other commenters opposed the limitation. The commenters who supported the provision noted that the engines are rarely called for emergency demand response, and that the EPA has limited the emergency demand response operation to emergency situations where a blackout is imminent. The commenters also noted that the public health impacts created by a widespread power outage outweigh the air quality impacts from the engines. The EPA agrees with the commenters that it is appropriate to include a provision for operation of emergency engines for a limited number of hours per year as part of emergency demand response programs to help prevent grid failure or blackouts. Preventing stationary emergency engines from being able to qualify and participate in emergency demand response programs without having to apply aftertreatment could force owners and operators to remove their engines from these programs, which could impair the ability of regional transmission organizations and independent system operators to use these relatively small, quick-starting and reliable sources of energy to protect the reliability of their systems. The commenters who opposed the provision for demand response provided no significant argument that the conditions***E.O. 12866 Review – Draft – Do Not Cite, Quote, or Release During Review*** Page 57 of 228 under which these engines would be permitted to operate for emergency demand response would not be emergency conditions. Commenters who opposed the provision were concerned about the air quality and health impacts of emissions from stationary engines. The commenters were concerned that recent actions by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) that impact demand response compensation in organized wholesale energy markets will greatly increase the amount of demand response participating in organized wholesale capacity markets. In response to the commenters, the EPA notes that, prior to the 2013 compliance dates for existing engines, there are no limitations on the hours of operation for those engines. The standards that go into effect in 2013 will for the first time establish requirements for these engines, including limitations on their hours of operation in certain situations such as emergency demand response, and ULSD fuel requirements which will reduce HAP emissions from the engines. Regarding the FERC regulations and their effect on use of demand response in capacity markets, these are comments more appropriately directed towards the FERC. As noted above, the emergency demand response situations during which the emergency engines may be used for a limited number of hours per year are appropriately considered emergency situations.***E.O. 12866 Review – Draft – Do Not Cite, Quote, or Release During Review*** Page 58 of 228 Commenters were also concerned that these engines would be called to operate for demand response on high ozone days, further contributing to nonattainment with ozone standards. However, other commenters noted that emergency demand response events do not predominantly occur on ozone exceedance days. These commenters also note that some of the commenters opposing use of emergency engines during emergency demand response would benefit by such a limitation because other emission sources may be used instead of the emergency engines, including sources that some of these commenters may operate, and that the effect on total emissions of using these alternative emission sources is not clear. Concerns about contribution to ozone nonattainment by stationary engines can be addressed through area-specific requirements such as state-based State Implementation Plans that

would be directed towards ozone nonattainment areas. More detail regarding the public comments and the EPA’s responses can be found in the Response to Public Comments document available in the rulemaking docket. As mentioned in the previous paragraph, in response to the concerns about the air quality impact of emissions from emergency engines operating in emergency demand response programs, and based on public comments received on the proposed rule, the EPA is finalizing a requirement for owners and operators of existing emergency CI stationary RICE with a site***E.O. 12866 Review – Draft – Do Not Cite, Quote, or Release During Review*** Page 59 of 228 rating of more than 100 brake HP and a displacement of less than 30 liters per cylinder that use diesel fuel and operate or are contractually obligated to be available for more than 15 hours per year (up to a maximum of 100 hours per year) for emergency demand response to use diesel fuel that meets the requirements in 40 CFR 80.510(b) for nonroad diesel fuel. This fuel requirement also applies to owners and operators of new emergency CI stationary RICE with a site rating of more than 500 brake HP with a displacement of less than 30 liters per cylinder located at a major source of HAP that use diesel fuel and operate or are contractually obligated to be available for more than 15 hours per year (up to a maximum of 100 hours per year) for emergency demand response. Owners and operators must begin meeting this ULSD fuel requirement on January 1, 2015, except that any existing diesel fuel purchased (or otherwise obtained) prior to January 1, 2015, may be used until depleted. As noted by commenters on the proposed amendments and as discussed in section II.B, requiring the use of diesel fuel meeting the requirements of 40 CFR 80.510(b) is expected to reduce the HAP emissions significantly from the engines compared to emissions resulting from use of unregulated diesel fuel. The fuel requirement begins on January 1, 2015, in order to give affected sources appropriate lead time to institute these new requirements and make any physical adjustments to engines and***E.O. 12866 Review – Draft – Do Not Cite, Quote, or Release During Review*** Page 60 of 228 other facilities like tanks or containment structures, as well as any needed adjustments to contracts and other business activities, that may be necessitated by these new requirements. The final amendments also require owners and operators of emergency stationary RICE larger than 100 HP that operate or are contractually obligated to be available for more than 15 hours per year (up to a maximum of 100 hours per year) for emergency demand response to submit an annual report to the EPA documenting the dates and times that the emergency stationary RICE operated for emergency demand response, beginning with the 2015 calendar year. Commenters on the proposed amendments recommended that the EPA gather information on the impacts of the emissions from emergency engines during emergency demand response situations. The EPA agrees that a reporting requirement will increase the EPA’s ability to ensure that these engines are operating in compliance with the regulations and that it will provide further information regarding the impacts of these engines on emissions. In response to these comments, the EPA is establishing a requirement to annually report to EPA the engine location and duration of operation for emergency demand response. This information will be used by the EPA, as well as state and local air pollution control agencies, to assess the health impacts of the emissions from these engines and to aid the EPA in ensuring that these engines comply with the Deleted:***E.O. 12866 Review – Draft – Do Not Cite, Quote, or Release During Review*** Page 61 of 228 regulations. Additional discussion of the rationale for the fuel and reporting requirements, as well as responses to other significant comments regarding emergency engines engaged in emergency demand response, can be found in the Response to

Public Comments document in the docket. Public commenters, in particular the National Rural Electric Cooperative Association (NRECA), indicated that the proposed EEA Level 2 and 5 percent voltage or frequency deviation triggers did not account for situations when the local balancing authority or transmission operator for the local electric system has determined that electric reliability is in jeopardy, and recommended that the EPA include additional situations where the local transmission and distribution system operator has determined that there are conditions that could

lead to a blackout for the local area. The comments from NRECA indicated that rural distribution lines are not configured in a typical grid pattern, but instead have distribution lines that can run well over 50 miles from a substation and regularly extend 15 miles or longer. During periods of exceptionally heavy stress within the region or sub-region, electricity from regional power generators may not be available because of transmission constraints, according to the commenter. The commenter indicated that in many cases, there may be only one***E.O. 12866 Review – Draft – Do Not Cite, Quote, or Release During Review*** Page 62 of 228 transmission line that feeds the rural distribution system, and no alternative means to transmit power into the local system. In response to those comments and in recognition of the unique challenges faced by the local transmission and distribution system operators in rural areas, the EPA is specifying in the final rule that existing emergency stationary RICE at area sources can be used for 50 hours per year as part of a financial arrangement with another entity if all of the following conditions are met:

 The engine is dispatched by the local balancing authority or local transmission and distribution system operator.

 The dispatch is intended to mitigate local transmission and/or distribution limitations so as to avert potential voltage collapse or line overloads that could lead to the interruption of power supply in a local area or region.

 The dispatch follows reliability, emergency operation or similar protocols that follow specific NERC, regional, state, public utility commission or local standards or guidelines.

 The power is provided only to the facility itself or to support the local transmission and distribution system.

 The owner or operator identifies and records the specific NERC, regional, state, public utility commission or local***E.O. 12866 Review – Draft – Do Not Cite, Quote, or Release During Review*** Page 63 of 228 standards or guidelines that are being followed for dispatching the engine. The local balancing authority or local transmission and distribution system operator may keep these records on behalf of the engine owner or operator. Engines operating in systems that do not meet the conditions described here will not be considered emergency engines if they operate for these purposes as part of a financial arrangement with another entity. Stationary emergency CI RICE with a site rating of more than 100 brake HP and a displacement of less than 30 liters per cylinder located at area sources that operate for this purpose are also required to use diesel fuel meeting the specifications of 40 CFR 80.510(b) beginning January 1, 2015, except that any existing diesel fuel purchased (or otherwise obtained) prior to January 1, 2015, may be used until depleted. Owners and operators of these engines are also required to report the dates and times the engines operated for this purpose annually to the EPA, beginning with operation during the 2015 calendar year. The report must also identify the entity that dispatched the engine and the situation that necessitated the dispatch of the engine. Further discussion of the rationale for the changes is available in the Response to Public Comments document in the docket. B. Peak Shaving***E.O. 12866 Review – Draft – Do Not Cite, Quote, or Release During Review*** Page 64 of 228 The EPA proposed a temporary provision for existing stationary emergency engines located at area sources to applythe 50 hours per year that is allowed under §63.6640(f) for nonemergency operation towards any non-emergency operation, including operation as part of a financial agreement with another entity. The peak shaving provision was proposed to expire in April 2017. The purpose of the proposed provision for peak shaving was to give sources an additional resource for maintaining reliability while facilities are coming into compliance with the NESHAP From Coal and Oil-Fired Electric Utility Steam Generating Units (77 FR 9304). Based on public comments received on the proposal, the EPA is not finalizing the proposed provision for peak shaving in this action. As noted by the commenters, operation for peak shaving does not fairly come under the definition of emergency use as it is designed to increase capacity in the system, rather than responding to an emergency situation such as a blackout or imminent brownout. The EPA believes that peak shaving activity and other activities designed to increase capacity should be treated as part of long term capacity planning, not as use akin to emergencies. The EPA agrees with commenters who state that allowance for emergency engines to be used for peak shaving could well lead to increased use of these engines, particularly in situations that are not emergency situations. The EPA also agrees that use of internal***E.O. 12866 Review – Draft – Do Not Cite, Quote, or Release During Review*** Page 65 of 228 combustion engines for peak shaving is not based on emergency use, but instead is generally based on the economic benefit gained by operating the engine rather than another power source. The EPA agrees with the commenters that there is not sufficient information on the record to show that these engines are needed to maintain reliability while facilities are coming into compliance with the NESHAP From Coal and Oil-Fired Electric Utility Steam Generating Units, and the commenters who supported the limited temporary provision did not provide information to show that rule would cause reliability issues that necessitate the operation of these engines. The EPA believes that given this information, it is appropriate to treat use of internal combustion engines as peak power units not as emergency use but as normal power generation, and thus believes it is appropriate to require emissions aftertreatment requirements (or similar controls as appropriate for non-emergency engines) for engines engaging in these activities for compensation. Further discussion is available in the Response to Public Comments

document in the docket. However, in consideration of the short time between this final rule and the May 3, 2013, or October 19, 2013 compliance dates for affected sources, this final rule permits the use of existing stationary emergency engines located at area sources for 50 hours per year through May 3, 2014 for peak shaving or***E.O. 12866 Review – Draft – Do Not Cite, Quote, or Release During Review*** Page 66 of 228 non-emergency demand response to generate income for a facility, or to otherwise supply power as part of a financial arrangement with another entity if the engines are operated as part of a peak shaving (load management) program with the local distribution system operator and the power is provided only to the facility itself or to support the local distribution system. Owners and operators of these engines, which have heretofore not been regulated, may have taken actions based on the June 7, 2012, proposal that would now leave them in danger of being in noncompliance with the applicable requirements for the engine in

the RICE NESHAP. C. Non-Emergency Stationary SI RICE Greater than 500 HP Located

at Area SourcesThe EPA proposed to require existing stationary nonemergency 4-stroke SI RICE greater than 500 HP located at area sources of HAP that are in sparsely populated areas to meet management practices. The proposed management practices required the engine owner and operator to change the oil and filter and inspect spark plugs, hoses and belts every 1,440 hours of operation or annually, whichever comes first. The proposed management practices were based on similar requirements for existing non-emergency stationary SI RICE smaller than 500 HP. The EPA received public comments indicating that the interval for performing the management practices for engines larger than***E.O. 12866 Review – Draft – Do Not Cite, Quote, or Release During Review*** Page 67 of 228 500 HP should be every 2,160 hours of operation or annually,

whichever comes first. Commenters indicated that larger engines have increased capabilities compared to smaller size engines, which allows engines to extend the maintenance interval. Larger engines have increased oil capacities, use improved oil grades/synthetics, and use oil sweetening systems, according to the commenters. Commenters also noted that larger engines use better quality, more expensive spark plugs that last longer than 1,440 hours, and that less frequent maintenance intervals reduce the environmental impacts associated with disposing waste oils and traveling to remote locations. The EPA agrees with the arguments presented by the commenters. Therefore, in this final rule, EPA is requiring engine owners and operators to change the oil and filter and inspect spark plugs, hoses and belts every 2,160 hours of operation or annually, whichever comes first. For existing stationary non-emergency SI 4SRB RICE that are in populated areas, the EPA proposed an equipment standard that required the installation of NSCR to reduce HAP emissions. The proposed rule required these engines to demonstrate that the catalyst achieves at least a 75 percent CO reduction or a 30 percent THC reduction. The EPA is retaining this requirement in this final rule, but is adding another option in response to public comments that allows the owner and operator of the engine to demonstrate that the catalyst achieves a CO concentration***E.O. 12866 Review – Draft – Do Not Cite, Quote, or Release During Review*** Page 68 of 228 level of 270 ppmvd at 15 percent O 2 . As noted by the public comments, this represents a 75 percent reduction from typical uncontrolled emissions from existing stationary non-emergency SI 4SRB RICE and is the CO standard required for new SI 4SRB engines in the NSPS for stationary SI engines. The EPA is also clarifying that, as was intended in the original proposal, engines located in Class 4 locations are not considered remote. More detail regarding the public comments and the rationale for these changes can be found in the Response to Public Comments document, which is available in the docket for this rulemaking.

D. Definition for Remote Areas of Alaska The EPA proposed to expand the definition of remote areas of Alaska to extend beyond areas that are not accessible by the FAHS. Specifically, the EPA proposed that areas of Alaska that are accessible by the FAHS and that met all of the following criteria would also be considered remote and subject to management practices under the rule: (1) the stationary CI engine is located in an area not connected to the Alaska Railbelt Grid; (2) at least 10 percent of the power generated by the engine per year is used for residential purposes; and (3) the generating capacity of the area source is less than 12 MW, or the engine is used exclusively for backup power for renewable energy and is used less than 500 hours per year on a 10-year rolling average. After considering the public comments received***E.O. 12866 Review – Draft – Do Not Cite, Quote, or Release During Review*** Page 69 of 228 on the proposed criteria, the EPA is finalizing the first two criteria as proposed, but finalizing a slightly different third criterion. In this final rule, existing CI engines at area sources of HAP are considered remote if they meet the first and second criteria above and they are either at a source with a generating capacity less than 12 MW, or used exclusively for backup power for renewable energy. Based on public comments received on the proposal, the EPA is not finalizing the limitation that the engine be used less than 500 hours per year on a 10-year rolling average. Commenters indicated that basing the applicability on the previous 10 years of operation would ignore recent investments in renewable energy that have significantly decreased engine hours of operation in recent years. The EPA is also defining “backup power for renewable energy” in this final rule as engines that provide backup power to a facility that generates electricity from renewable energy resources, as that term is defined in Alaska Statute 42.45.045(l)(5). The rationale for these changes can be found in the Response to Public Comments document available in the

docket.

E. Requirements for Offshore Vessels The RICE NESHAP does not on its face apply to mobile sources, including marine vessels. However, the regulations applicable to sources on the OCS, codified at 40 CFR part 55,***E.O. 12866 Review – Draft – Do Not Cite, Quote, or Release During Review*** Page 70 of 228 specify that vessels are OCS sources when they are (1) permanently or temporarily attached to the seabed and erected thereon and used for the purpose of exploring, developing or producing resources there from, within the meaning of section 4(a)(1) of the OCS Lands Act (43 U.S.C. §1331, et seq .); or (2) physically attached to an OCS facility, in which case only the stationary sources aspects of the vessels will be regulated. 40 CFR 55.2. The OCS regulations provide that NESHAP requirements apply to a vessel that is an OCS source where the provisions are “rationally related to the attainment and maintenance of the federal or state ambient air quality standards or the requirements of part C of title I of the Act.” 40 CFR 55.13(e). The EPA received comments during the public comment period for the June 7, 2012, proposal recommending that the RICE NESHAP be amended such that for any existing non-emergency CI RICE above 300 HP on offshore vessels on the OCS that become subject to the RICE NESHAP as a result of the operation of the OCS regulations (40 CFR part 55), such engines may meet the NESHAP through management practices rather than numeric emission limits. This amendment was not contained or contemplated in the June 7, 2012, proposal. However, the comments indicated several significant issues related to application of the NESHAP to regulation of existing marine vessel engines located in the OCS as a result of the OCS regulations; in particular, whether the***E.O. 12866 Review – Draft – Do Not Cite, Quote, or Release During Review*** Page 71 of 228 numerical standards applicable to other CI engines located at area sources (marine vessels located in the OCS are generally located at area sources) are technologically feasible for existing marine engines located in the OCS. Some commenters noted specific technological issues relevant to engines on

marine vessels in the OCS. The commenters indicated that emission controls for existing CI RICE to meet the NESHAP may be technically infeasible due to weight and space constraints, catalyst fouling from the low-load engine operation required by the U.S. Coast Guard, safety concerns regarding engine backpressure and lack of catalyst vendor experience with retrofitting. Commenters suggested that, to the extent marine vessel engines become subject to the NESHAP as a result of the OCS regulations, these engines should be subject to GACT requirements that the commenters believe are more appropriate for these types of engines. The commenters indicated that management practices similar to those currently required in the rule for existing non-emergency stationary CI RICE smaller than 300 HP are more appropriate as GACT for existing non-emergency stationary CI RICE above 300 HP on vessels operating on the OCS. Based on these comments, the EPA published a reopening of the comment period to take further comment on whether the RICE NESHAP should be revised to require management practices for

these vessels (77 FR 60341). Based on the comments received Deleted:

.***E.O. 12866 Review – Draft – Do Not Cite, Quote, or Release During Review*** Page 72 of 228 during the two comment periods, the EPA agrees with the commenters that management practices are more reasonable as GACT for existing non-emergency stationary CI RICE larger than 300 HP on vessels operating on the OCS and is finalizing management practices for these engines. The EPA did not receive any public comments indicating that HAP emission controls were generally available and had been demonstrated for the large engines on the vessels. The final management practices include changing the oil every 1,000 hours of operation or annually, whichever comes first; inspecting and cleaning air filters every 750 hours of operation or annually, whichever comes first, and replacing as necessary; inspecting fuel filters and belts, if installed, every 750 hours of operation or annually, whichever comes first, and replacing as necessary; and inspecting all flexible hoses every 1,000 hours of operation or annually, whichever comes first, and replacing as necessary. Facilities have the option of using an oil analysis program to extend the oil change requirement. Additional discussion of the rationale for these changes can be found in the Response to Public Comments document

available in the docket. **IV. Summary of Environmental, Energy and Economic Impacts**

A. What are the air quality impacts?

The EPA estimates that the rule with the final amendments incorporated will reduce emissions from existing stationary RICE***E.O. 12866 Review – Draft – Do Not Cite, Quote, or Release During Review*** Page 73 of 228 as shown in Table 4 of this preamble. The emissions reductions the EPA previously estimated for the 2010 amendments to the RICE NESHAP are shown for comparison. Reductions are shown for the year 2013, which is the first year the final RICE NESHAP will be implemented for existing stationary RICE. Table 4. Summary of Reductions for Existing Stationary RICE

**Pollutant Emission Reductions (tpy)**  **in the year 2013 2010 Final Rule**  **2010 Final Rule with these Final Amendments**  **CI SI**  **C I**  **S I**  **HAP** 1,014 6,008 1,005 1,778 **CO** 14,342 109,321 14,238 22,211 **PM** 2,844 N/A 2 ,818 N /A **NO x**  N/A 96,479 N/A 9,648 **VOC** 27,395 30,907 27,142 9,147 The EPA estimates that more than 900,000 stationary CI engines will be subject to the rule in total, but only a small number of stationary CI engines are affected by the final amendments in this action. The EPA did not estimate any changes

in the reductions from the 2010 rule for the amendments associated with emergency engines. To determine emissions from emergency engines for the 2010 rule, the EPA estimated that these types of engines would on average operate for 50 hours per year. The average hours of operation for emergency engines is not expected to change based on the final amendments and 50 hours per year is still believed to be representative of average emergency engine operation. Information provided by commenters Formatted Table***E.O. 12866 Review – Draft – Do Not Cite, Quote, or Release During Review*** Page 74 of 228 demonstrated that these engines have been operated very infrequently for emergency demand response events. 8 Therefore, the emissions previously calculated remain appropriate. It is estimated that approximately 330,000 stationary SI engines will be subject to the rule in total; however, only a subset of stationary SI engines are affected by the final

amendments in this action. The decrease in estimated reductions for SI engines is primarily due to final amendments to the requirements for existing 4SRB and 4SLB SI engines larger than

500 HP at area sources of HAP that are in remote areas. Those engines were required by the 2010 rule to meet emission limits that were expected to require the installation of aftertreatment to reduce emissions; under these final amendments, those engines are required to meet management practices that would not require

the installation of aftertreatment. Further information regarding the estimated reductions of this final rule can be found in the memorandum titled, “RICE NESHAP Reconsideration Final Amendments - Cost and Environmental Impacts,” which is available in the docket (EPA-HQ-OAR-2008-0708). The EPA did not estimate any impacts associated with the minor changes to the NSPS for stationary CI and SI engines. B. What are the cost impacts?

8 See document number EPA-HQ-OAR-2008-0708-1142 in the rulemaking docket.***E.O. 12866 Review – Draft – Do Not Cite, Quote, or Release During Review*** Page 75 of 228 The final amendments are expected to reduce the overall cost of the original 2010 RICE NESHAP amendments. The EPA estimates that with these final amendments incorporated, the cost of the rule for existing stationary RICE will be as shown in Table 5 of this preamble. The costs the EPA previously

estimated for the 2010 amendments to the RICE NESHAP are shown for comparison. The costs that were previously estimated are shown in the original year ($2008 for CI and $2009 for SI), as well as updated to 2010 dollars. Table 5. Summary of Cost Impacts for Existing Stationary RICE

**Engine 2010 Final Rule**  **2010 Final Rule with these Final Amendments**  **Total Annual Cost SI**  $253 million ($2009) $251 million ($2010) $115 million ($2010)

**CI** $373 million ($2008) $375 million ($2010) $373 million ($2010) **Total Capital Cost SI**  $383 million ($2009) $380 million ($2010) $103 million ($2010)

**CI** $744 million ($2008) $748 million ($2010) $740 million ($2010)

Further information regarding the estimated cost impacts of the final amendments, including the cost of the final amendments in 2010 dollars, can be found in the memorandum titled, “RICE

NESHAP Reconsideration Final Amendments - Cost and Environmental Impacts,” which is available in the docket (EPA-HQ-OAR-2008- 0708). The EPA did not estimate costs associated with the changes to the NSPS for stationary CI and SI engines. The Formatted Table

Formatted Table***E.O. 12866 Review – Draft – Do Not Cite, Quote, or Release During Review*** Page 76 of 228 changes to the NSPS are minor and are not expected to impact the

costs of those rules.

C. What are the benefits? Emission controls installed to meet the requirements of this final rule will generate benefits by reducing emissions of HAP as well as criteria pollutants and their precursors, including CO, NOx and VOC. NOx and VOC are precursors to PM 2.5 (particles smaller than 2.5 microns) and ozone. The criteria pollutant benefits are considered co-benefits for this rule. For this final rule, the EPA was only able to quantify the health co-benefits associated with reduced exposure to PM 2.5 from emission reductions of NOx and directly emitted PM 2.5 . The EPA has not re-estimated the benefits from the proposal for this final rule because the emission reductions have not changed since the reconsideration proposal. 11

11 Since the June 7, 2012 reconsideration proposal, the EPA has made several updates to the approach used to estimate mortality and morbidity benefits, as demonstrated in the RIA for the PM NAAQS. Changes include applying the concentration-response functions from more recent epidemiology studies, adding some health endpoints, and updating population data. Although the EPA has not re-estimated the benefits for this rule by applying these changes, we anticipate that the rounded benefits estimated for this rule are unlikely to be very different than those provided here. Specifically, we anticipate that the changes that would likely lead to small increases in the benefits would likely be offset by changes that would likely lead to small decreases in the benefits. References for the RIA for the PM NAAQS are: (1) U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (U.S. EPA). 2012a. Regulatory Impact Analysis for the Proposed Revisions to the National Ambient Air Quality Standards for Particulate Deleted: Since the June 7, 2012, reconsideration proposal, the EPA has made several updates to the approach we use to estimate mortality and morbidity benefits in the PM NAAQS RIA, 9,10 including updated epidemiology studies, health endpoints, and populationdata. Although the EPA has not reestimated the benefits for this rule to apply this new approach, these updates generally offset each other, and we anticipate that the rounded benefits estimated for this rule are unlikely to be different than those provided above.***E.O. 12866 Review – Draft – Do Not Cite, Quote, or Release During Review*** Page 77 of 228 The EPA previously estimated that the monetized co-benefits in 2013 of the stationary CI NESHAP would be $940 million to $2,300 million (2008 dollars) at a 3-percent discount rate and $850 million to $2,100 million (2008 dollars) at a 7-percent

discount rate. 12 For stationary SI engines, EPA previously estimated that the monetized co-benefits in 2013 would be $510 million to $1,200 million (2009 dollars) at a 3-percent discount rate) and $460 million to $1,100 million (2009 dollars) at a 7- percent discount rate. 13 The final amendments are expected to reduce the overall emission reductions of the rules, primarily due to the changes to requirements for engines in remote areas. In addition to revising the anticipated emission reductions, the EPA has also

Matter. EPA-452/R-12-003. Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards, Health and Environmental Impacts Division. June. Available at http://www.epa.gov/ttnecas1/regdata/RIAs/PMRIACombinedFile_Bookm arked.pdf. (2) U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (U.S. EPA). 2012b. Regulatory Impact Analysis for the Final Revisions to the National Ambient Air Quality Standards for Particulate Matter. EPA-452/R-12-003. Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards, Health and Environmental Impacts Division. December. Available at http://www.epa.gov/pm/2012/finalria.pdf. 12 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 2010. Regulatory Impact Analysis (RIA) for Existing Stationary Compression Ignition Engines NESHAP: Final Draft . Research Triangle Park, NC. February. http://www.epa.gov/ttn/ecas/regdata/RIAs/CIRICENESHAPRIA2-17- 0cleanpublication.pdf. 13 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 2010. Regulatory Impact Analysis (RIA) for Existing Stationary Spark Ignition (SI) RICE NESHAP: Final Report . Research Triangle Park, NC. August. http://www.epa.gov/ttn/ecas/regdata/RIAs/riceriafinal.pdf.***E.O. 12866 Review – Draft – Do Not Cite, Quote, or Release During Review*** Page 78 of 228 updated the methodology used to calculate the co-benefits to be consistent with methods used in more recent rulemakings, which

is summarized below and discussed in more detail in the CI and SI Final Reconsideration RIAs, the RIAs for this rulemaking. The

EPA estimates the monetized co-benefits of the final amendments of the CI NESHAP in 2013 to be $770 million to $1,900 million (2010 dollars) at a 3-percent discount rate and $690 million to $1,700 million (2010 dollars) at a 7-percent discount rate. For SI engines, the EPA estimates the monetized co-benefits of the final amendments in 2013 to be $62 million to $150 million (2010 dollars) at a 3-percent discount rate and $55 million to $140 million (2010 dollars) at a 7-percent discount rate. Using alternate relationships between PM 2.5 and premature mortality supplied by experts, higher and lower co-benefits estimates are plausible, but most of the expert-based estimates

fall between these two estimates. 14 A summary of the monetized co-benefits estimates for CI and SI engines at discount rates of 3 percent and 7 percent is in Table 6 of this preamble.

14 Roman, et al. , 2008. Expert Judgment Assessment of the Mortality Impact of Changes in Ambient Fine Particulate Matter in the U.S. , Environ. Sci. Technol., 42, 7, 2268 – 2274.***E.O. 12866 Review – Draft – Do Not Cite, Quote, or Release During Review*** Page 79 of 228 Table 6. Summary of the Monetized PM 2.5 Co-Benefits Final Amendments to the NESHAP for Stationary CI and SI Engines (millions of 2010 dollars) a, b

Pollutant Emission reductions

(tons per

year) Total monetized co-benefits

(3 percent Discount) Total monetized co-benefits

(7 percent Discount) Original 2010 Final Rules c Stationary CI Engines Total Benefits 2,844 PM 2.5 27,395 VOC $950 to $2,300 $860 to $2,100 Stationary SI Engines Total Benefits 96,479 NOx 30,907 VOC $510 to $1,300 $470 to $1,100 2010 Final Rules with these Final Amendments Stationary CI Engines Directly emitted PM 2.5 2,818 $770 to $1,900 $690 to $1,700 Stationary SI Engines NOx 9,648 $62 to $150 $55 to $140

a All estimates are for the analysis year (2013) and are rounded to two significant figures so numbers may not sum across rows. The total monetized co-benefits reflect the human health benefits associated with reducing exposure to PM 2.5 through reductions of PM 2.5 precursors, such as NOx and directly emitted PM 2.5 . It is important to note that the monetized co-benefits do not include reduced health effects from exposure to HAP, direct exposure to NO 2 , exposure to ozone, ecosystem effects or visibility impairment. b PM co-benefits are shown as a range from Pope, et al. (2002) to Laden, et al. (2006). These models assume that all fine particles, regardless of their chemical composition, are equally potent in causing premature mortality because the scientific evidence is not yet sufficient to allow differentiation of effects estimates by particle type.

c The benefits analysis for the 2010 final rules applied outdated benefit-per-ton estimates compared to the updatedestimates described in this preamble and reflected monetized cobenefits for VOC emissions, which limits direct comparability with the monetized co-benefits estimated for this final rule. In addition, these estimates have been updated from their original currency years to 2010$, so the rounded estimates for the 2010 final rules may not match the original RIAs. Formatted Table

Formatted Table***E.O. 12866 Review – Draft – Do Not Cite, Quote, or Release During Review*** Page 80 of 228

These co-benefits estimates represent the total monetized human health benefits for populations exposed to less PM 2.5 in 2013 from controls installed to reduce air pollutants in order

to meet this final rule. To estimate human health co-benefits of these rules, the EPA used benefit-per-ton factors to quantify the changes in PM 2.5 -related health impacts and monetized benefits based on changes in directly emitted PM 2.5 and NOx emissions. These benefit-per-ton factors were derived using the general approach and methodology laid out in Fann, Fulcher and Hubbell (2009). 15 This approach uses a model to convert emissions

of PM 2.5 precursors into changes in ambient PM 2.5 levels and another model to estimate the changes in human health associated with that change in air quality, which are then divided by the emission reductions to create the benefit-per-ton estimates. However, for these rules, the EPA utilized air quality modeling of emissions in the “Non-EGU Point other” category because the EPA does not have modeling specifically for stationary engines. 16,17 The primary difference between the estimates used in

15 Fann, N., C.M. Fulcher, B.J. Hubbell. 2009. The influence of location, source, and emission type in estimates of the human health benefits of reducing a ton of air pollution . Air Qual Atmos Health (2009) 2:169–176. 16 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 2012. Technical support document: Estimating the benefit per ton of reducing PM 2.5 precursors from other point sources

. Research Triangle Park, NC. 17 Stationary engines are included in the other non-EGU point source category. If the affected stationary engines are more***E.O. 12866 Review – Draft – Do Not Cite, Quote, or Release During Review*** Page 81 of 228 this analysis and the estimates reported in Fann, Fulcher and Hubbell (2009) is the air quality modeling data utilized. While the air quality data used in Fann, Fulcher and Hubbell (2009) reflects broad pollutant/source category combinations, such as all non-EGU stationary point sources, the air quality modeling data used in this analysis has narrower sector categories. In addition, the updated air quality modeling data reflects more recent emissions data (2005 rather than 2001) and has a higher spatial resolution (12 km rather than 36 km grid cells). The benefits methodology, such as health endpoints assessed, risk estimates applied, and valuation techniques applied did not change. As a result, the benefit-per-ton estimates presented herein better reflect the geographic areas and populations likely to be affected by this sector. However, these updated estimates still have similar limitations as all national-average benefit-per-ton estimates in that they reflect the geographic distribution of the modeled emissions, which may not exactly match the emission reductions in this rulemaking, and they may not reflect local variability in population density,

rural than the average of the non-EGU sources modeled, then it is possible that the benefits may be somewhat less than the EPA has estimated here. The TSD provides the geographic distribution of the air quality changes associated with this sector. It is important to emphasize that this modeling represents the best available information on the air quality impact on a per ton basis for these sources.***E.O. 12866 Review – Draft – Do Not Cite, Quote, or Release During Review*** Page 82 of 228 meteorology, exposure, baseline health incidence rates or other local factors for any specific location. 18 The EPA applies these national benefit-per-ton estimates calculated for this sector separately for directly emitted PM 2.5 and NOx and multiply them by the corresponding emission reductions. The sector modeling does not provide estimates of

the PM 2.5 -related benefits associated with reducing VOC emissions, but these unquantified benefits are generally small compared to other PM 2.5 precursors. More information regarding the derivation of the benefit-per-ton estimates for this category is

available in the Technical Support Document , which is available

in the docket for this rulemaking

. These models assume that all fine particles, regardless of their chemical composition, are equally potent in causing premature mortality because the scientific evidence is not yet

18 To the extent that the PM2.5 improvements achieved by the 2010 final rule would have been located in areas with lower average population density compared to the engines regulated under these amendments, there is a potential for the estimated loss in benefits to be overstated by the use of national-average benefit-per-ton estimates. For example, if only engines in areas with higher population density are regulated, this scenario should result in higher benefit-per-ton estimates than a scenario only regulating engines in areas with lower population density. It is important to note that the benefit-per-ton estimates that EPA applied in this assessment reflect pollution transport as well as a variety of emission source locations, including areas with high and low population density. Without information regarding the specific location of the engines affected by the 2010 final rule and the amendments, it is not possible to be more precise regarding the true magnitude of the loss in benefits. Deleted: technical support document***E.O. 12866 Review – Draft – Do Not Cite, Quote, or Release During Review*** Page 83 of 228 sufficient to allow differentiation of effects estimates by particle type. The main PM 2.5 precursors affected by this final rule are directly emitted PM 2.5 and NOx. Even though the EPA assumes that all fine particles have equivalent health effects, the benefit-per-ton estimates vary between precursors depending on the location and magnitude of their impact on PM 2.5 levels, which drive population exposure. For example, directly emitted

NOx has a lower benefit-per-ton estimate than direct PM 2.5 because it does not form as much PM 2.5 ; thus, the exposure would be lower, and the monetized health benefits would be lower. It is important to note that the magnitude of the PM 2.5 cobenefits is largely driven by the concentration response function for premature mortality. Experts have advised the EPA to consider a variety of assumptions, including estimates based both on empirical (epidemiological) studies and judgments elicited from scientific experts, to characterize the uncertainty in the relationship between PM 2.5 concentrations and premature mortality. The EPA cites two key empirical studies, one based on the American Cancer Society cohort study 19 and the extended Six Cities cohort study. 20 In the RIA for the proposed

19 Pope, et al. , 2002. Lung Cancer, Cardiopulmonary Mortality, and Long-term Exposure to Fine Particulate Air Pollution

. Journal of the American Medical Association 287:1132-1141. 20 Laden, et al. , 2006. Reduction in Fine Particulate Air Pollution and Mortality . American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine 173: 667-672. Deleted: PM 2 .5***E.O. 12866 Review – Draft – Do Not Cite, Quote, or Release During Review*** Page 84 of 228 reconsideration amendments rule, which is available in the docket, the EPA also includes benefits estimates derived from the expert judgments and other assumptions.

The EPA strives to use the best available science to support our benefits analyses. The EPA recognizes that interpretation of the science regarding air pollution and health is dynamic and evolving. After reviewing the scientific literature, the EPA has determined that the no-threshold model is the most appropriate model for assessing the mortality benefits associated with reducing PM 2.5 exposure. Consistent with this finding, the EPA has conformed the previous threshold sensitivity analysis to the current state of the PM science by incorporating a new “Lowest Measured Level” (LML) assessment in the RIA accompanying these rules. While an LML assessment provides some insight into the level of uncertainty in the estimated PM mortality benefits, the EPA does not view the LML as a threshold and continues to quantify PM-related mortality impacts using a full range of modeled air quality

concentrations.

Most of the estimated PM-related co-benefits for these rules would accrue to populations exposed to higher levels of

PM 2.5 . For this analysis, policy-specific air quality data are not available due to time or resource limitations, and, thus, the EPA is unable to estimate the percentage of premature***E.O. 12866 Review – Draft – Do Not Cite, Quote, or Release During Review*** Page 85 of 228 mortality associated with this specific rule’s emission

reductions at each PM 2.5 level. As a surrogate measure of mortality impacts, the EPA provides the percentage of the population exposed at each PM 2.5 level using the source apportionment modeling used to calculate the benefit-per-ton estimates for this sector. Using the Pope, et al. (2002) study, 77 percent of the population is exposed to annual mean PM 2.5 levels at or above the LML of 7.5 micrograms per cubic meter (μg/m 3 ). Using the Laden, et al. (2006) study, 25 percent of the population is exposed above the LML of 10 μg/m 3 . It is important to emphasize that we have high confidence in PM 2.5 -related effects down to the lowest LML of the major cohort studies. This fact is important, because, as the EPA models avoided premature deaths among populations exposed to levels of PM 2.5 , the EPA has lower confidence in levels below the LML for each study. Every benefit analysis examining the potential effects of a change in environmental protection requirements is limited, to some extent, by data gaps, model capabilities (such as geographic coverage) and uncertainties in the underlying scientific and economic studies used to configure the benefit and cost models. Despite these uncertainties, the EPA believes the benefit analysis for these rules provides a reasonable indication of the expected health benefits of the rulemaking under a set of reasonable assumptions. This analysis does not***E.O. 12866 Review – Draft – Do Not Cite, Quote, or Release During Review*** Page 86 of 228 include the type of detailed uncertainty assessment found in the

2006 PM 2.5 National Ambient Air Quality Standard (NAAQS) RIA because the EPA lacks the necessary air quality input and monitoring data to run the benefits model. In addition, the EPA has not conducted air quality modeling for these rules, and using a benefit-per-ton approach adds another important source of uncertainty to the benefits estimates. The 2006 PM 2.5 NAAQS benefits analysis 21 provides an indication of the sensitivity of our results to various assumptions.

It should be noted that the monetized co-benefits estimates provided above do not include benefits from several important benefit categories, including exposure to HAP, NOx, ozone, as well as ecosystem effects and visibility impairment. Although the EPA does not have sufficient information or modeling available to provide monetized estimates for these amendments, the EPA includes a qualitative assessment of these unquantified

benefits in the RIAs for these final amendments. For more information on the benefits analysis, please refer to the CI and SI RIAs for these amendments, which are available

in the docket.

21 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 2006. Proposed amendments Regulatory Impact Analysis: PM 2.5 NAAQS . Prepared by Office of Air and Radiation. October. Available on the Internet at http://www.epa.gov/ttn/ecas/ria.html

.***E.O. 12866 Review – Draft – Do Not Cite, Quote, or Release During Review*** Page 87 of 228 D. What are the non-air health, environmental and energy impacts? The EPA does not anticipate any significant non-air health, environmental or energy impacts as a result of these final

amendments. **V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews** A. Executive Order 12866: Regulatory Planning and Review and Executive Order 13563: Improving Regulation and Regulatory

Review Under section 3(f)(1) of Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993), this action is an “economically significant regulatory action” because it is likely to have an annual effect on the economy of $100 million or more. Accordingly, the EPA submitted this action to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for review under Executive Order 12866 and Executive Order 13563 (76 FR 3821, January 21, 2011), and any changes made in response to OMB recommendations have been documented in the docket for this action. In addition, the EPA prepared a RIA of the potential costs and benefits

associated with this action. A summary of the monetized benefits, compliance costs and

net benefits for the 2010 rule with the final amendments to the stationary CI engines NESHAP at discount rates of 3 percent and 7 percent is in Table 7 of this preamble. The summary for***E.O. 12866 Review – Draft – Do Not Cite, Quote, or Release During Review*** Page 88 of 228 stationary SI engines is included in Table 8 of this preamble. OMB Circular A-4 recommends that analysis of a change in an existing regulatory program use a baseline that assumes “no change” in the existing regulation. For purposes of this final rule, however, the EPA has decided that it is appropriate to assume a baseline in which the original 2010 rule did not exist. The EPA feels that this baseline is appropriate because full implementation of this final rule has not taken place as of yet (it will take place in 2013). In addition, this assumption is consistent with the baseline definition applied in the proposed NESHAP for Industrial, Commercial, and Institutional Boilers (76 FR 80532) and NSPS for Commercial/Industrial Solid Waste Incineration Units (76 FR 80452). We have not re-estimated the benefits from the proposal for this final rule because the emission reductions have not changed since the reconsideration proposal. Since the June 7, 2012, reconsideration proposal, we have updated the epidemiology studies used to calculate mortality and morbidity benefits in the PM NAAQS proposal RIA. 22 These updates would reduce the monetized benefits estimated for the RICE NESHAP reconsideration by less than 4 percent.

22 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (U.S. EPA). 2012. Regulatory Impact Analysis for the Proposed Revisions to the National Ambient Air Quality Standards for Particulate Matter. EPA-452/R-12-003. Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards, Health and Environmental Impacts Division. June. Available at http://www.epa.gov/ttnecas1/regdata/RIAs/PMRIACombinedFile_Bookm arked.pdf.***E.O. 12866 Review – Draft – Do Not Cite, Quote, or Release During Review*** Page 89 of 228 Table 7. Summary of the Monetized Benefits, Compliance Costs and Net benefits for the 2010 Rule with the Final Amendments to the Stationary CI Engine NESHAP in 2013 (millions of 2010 dollars) a 3-Percent Discount Rate 7-Percent Discount Rate Total Monetized Benefits b $770 to $1,900 $690 to $1,700 Total Compliance Costs c $373 $373 Net Benefits $400 to $1,500 $320 to $1,300

Non-Monetized Benefits Health effects from exposure to HAP Health effects from direct exposure to NO 2 and ozone Health effects from PM 2 .5 exposure from VOC Ecosystem effects Visibility impairment

a All estimates are for the implementation year (2013) and are rounded to two significant figures. b The total monetized co-benefits reflect the human health benefits associated with reducing exposure to PM 2.5 through reductions of PM 2.5 precursors, such as NOx and directly emitted PM 2.5 . Co-benefits are shown as a range from Pope, et al. (2002) to Laden, et al. (2006). These models assume that all fine particles, regardless of their chemical composition, are equally potent in causing premature mortality because the scientific evidence is not yet sufficient to allow differentiation of effects estimates by particle type.

c The engineering compliance costs are annualized using a 7- percent discount rate. Table 8. Summary of the Monetized Benefits, Compliance Costs and Net benefits for the 2010 Rule with the Final Amendments to the Stationary SI Engine NESHAP in 2013 (millions of 2010 dollars) a 3-Percent Discount Rate 7-Percent Discount Rate Total Monetized Benefits b $62 to $150 $55 to $140 Total Compliance Costs c $115 $115 Net Benefits $-53 to $35 $-60 to $25

Non-Monetized Benefits Health effects from exposure to HAP Health effects from direct exposure to NO 2 and ozone Formatted Table

Formatted Table***E.O. 12866 Review – Draft – Do Not Cite, Quote, or Release During Review*** Page 90 of 228

Health effects from PM 2 .5 exposure from VOC Ecosystem effects Visibility impairment

a All estimates are for the implementation year (2013) and are rounded to two significant figures. b The total monetized co-benefits reflect the human health benefits associated with reducing exposure to PM 2.5 through reductions of PM 2.5 precursors, such as NOx and directly emitted PM 2.5 . Co-benefits are shown as a range from Pope, et al. (2002) to Laden, et al. (2006). These models assume that all fine particles, regardless of their chemical composition, are equally potent in causing premature mortality because the scientific evidence is not yet sufficient to allow differentiation of effects estimates by particle type.

c The engineering compliance costs are annualized using a 7- percent discount rate. For more information on the cost-benefit analysis, please refer to the RIA for these final amendments, which is available

in the docket for this rulemaking

. B. Paperwork Reduction Act The information collection requirements in this final rule for stationary SI RICE have been submitted for approval to OMB under the Paperwork Reduction Act, 44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq. The information collection requirements are not enforceable until OMB approves them. As discussed in this preamble to this final action, there are reporting requirements that will begin in 2016. Owners and operators of emergency stationary engines that operate or are contractually obligated to be available for more than 15 hours per year for emergency demand response must document their operation in annual reports to the EPA. These reports are***E.O. 12866 Review – Draft – Do Not Cite, Quote, or Release During Review*** Page 91 of 228 necessary to enable EPA or States to identify affected facilities that may not be in compliance with the requirements. The burden of this reporting requirement is not included in the ICR burden estimate because it is after the first 3 years after which sources must begin complying with the rule. The reporting burden beginning in 2016 would only be included starting with

the first ICR renewal. The EPA estimates the annual burden of this reporting requirement to be approximately 77,128 labor hours at a cost of $4.8 million in the first year that reporting is required, 2015, and 24,628 labor hours at a cost of $1.7 million in subsequent years. An Agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number. The OMB control numbers for EPA’s regulations in 40 CFR are listed in 40 CFR part 9. When this ICR is approved by OMB, the Agency will publish a technical amendment to 40 CFR part 9 in the Federal Register to display the OMB control number for the approved information collection requirements contained in this final

rule. The OMB has previously approved the information collection requirements contained in the 2010 RICE NESHAP final rulemaking, including those for stationary CI RICE, under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act, 44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq. and has***E.O. 12866 Review – Draft – Do Not Cite, Quote, or Release During Review*** Page 92 of 228 assigned OMB control number 2060-0548. The OMB control numbers for the EPA's regulations in 40 CFR are listed in 40 CFR part 9. C. Regulatory Flexibility Act The Regulatory Flexibility Act generally requires an agency to prepare a regulatory flexibility analysis of any rule subject to notice and comment rulemaking requirements under the Administrative Procedure Act or any other statute unless the agency certifies that the rule will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities. Small entities include small businesses, small organizations and small governmental jurisdictions. For purposes of assessing the impacts of this rule on small entities, small entity is defined as: (1) A small business as defined by the Small Business Administration’s (SBA) regulations at 13 CFR 121.201; (2) a small governmental jurisdiction that is a government of a city, county, town, school district or special district with a population of less than 50,000; and (3) a small organization that is any not-for-profit enterprise which is independently owned and operated and is not dominant in its

field. The SBA defines a small business in terms of the maximum employment, annual sales, or annual energy-generating capacity (for electricity generating units—EGUs) of the owning entity. As mentioned earlier in this preamble, facilities across several***E.O. 12866 Review – Draft – Do Not Cite, Quote, or Release During Review*** Page 93 of 228 industries use affected CI and SI stationary RICE; therefore, a number of size standards are utilized in this analysis. After considering the economic impacts of this final rule on small entities, I certify that this action will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities. The small entities directly regulated by this final rule are those in the 15 industries identified in the 6-digit NAICS code represented in this analysis; the employment size standard (where it applies) varies from 500 to 1,000 employees. The annual sales standard (where it applies) is as low as 0.75 million dollars and as high as 33.5 million dollars. In addition, for the electric power generation industry, which is one of the affected industries, the small business size standard is an ultimate parent entity defined as having a total electric output of 4 million megawatt-hours in the previous fiscal year. We have determined that the percentage of small entities impacted by this final rule having annualized costs of greater than 1 percent of their sales is less than 2 percent of all affected small entities according to the small entity analysis. Although the final reconsideration rule will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities, the EPA nonetheless tried to reduce the impact of this rule on small entities. When developing the revised standards, the EPA took special steps to ensure that the burdens imposed on***E.O. 12866 Review – Draft – Do Not Cite, Quote, or Release During Review*** Page 94 of 228 small entities were minimal. The EPA conducted several meetings with industry trade associations to discuss regulatory options and the corresponding burden on industry, such as recordkeeping and reporting. In addition, as mentioned earlier in this preamble, the EPA is reducing the regulatory requirements for a variety of area sources affected under each of the RICE rules with amendments to the final RICE rules promulgated in 2010. For more information on the small entity impacts associated with this rulemaking, please refer to the Economic Impact and Small Business Analyses in the public docket. These analyses can be found in the RIA for each of the rules affected by this

action.

D. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act This rule does not contain a federal mandate that may result in expenditures of $100 million or more for state, local and tribal governments, in the aggregate, or the private sector in any one year. The EPA is finalizing management practices for certain existing engines located at area sources and is finalizing amendments that will provide owners and operators with alternative and less expensive compliance demonstration methods. As a result of these changes, the EPA anticipates a

substantial reduction in the cost burden associated with this rule. Thus, this final rule is not subject to the requirements

of sections 202 or 205 of UMRA.***E.O. 12866 Review – Draft – Do Not Cite, Quote, or Release During Review*** Page 95 of 228 This final rule is also not subject to the requirements of section 203 of UMRA because it contains no regulatory requirements that might significantly or uniquely affect small governments. The changes being finalized in this action by the agency will mostly affect stationary engine owners and operators and will not affect small governments. These final amendments

will lead to a reduction in the cost burden.

E. Executive Order 13132: Federalism This action does not have federalism implications. It will not have substantial direct effects on the states, on the relationship between the national government and the states or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government, as specified in Executive Order 13132. This action primarily affects private industry, and does not impose significant economic costs on state or local governments. Thus, Executive Order 13132 does not apply to this action. In the spirit of Executive Order 13132, and consistent with the EPA policy to promote communications between the EPA and state and local governments, the EPA specifically solicited comment on the proposed action from state and local officials.

F. Executive Order 13175: Consultation and Coordination with

Indian Tribal Governments This action does not have tribal implications, as specified in Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000). It***E.O. 12866 Review – Draft – Do Not Cite, Quote, or Release During Review*** Page 96 of 228 will not have substantial direct effects on tribal governments, on the relationship between the federal government and Indian tribes or on the distribution of power and responsibilities between the federal government and Indian tribes, as specified in Executive Order 13175. Thus, Executive Order 13175 does not apply to this action. In the spirit of Executive Order 13175, and consistent with the EPA policy to promote communications between the EPA and tribal governments, the EPA has conducted outreach to tribal governments by providing information on the rule during National Tribal Air Association/EPA Policy Calls.

G. Executive Order 13045: Protection of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks

The EPA interprets Executive Order 13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997) as applying only to those regulatory actions that are based on health or safety risks, such that the analysis required under section 5-501 of the Executive Order has the potential to influence the regulation. This action is not subject to Executive Order 13045 because it is based solely on technology performance. H. Executive Order 13211: Actions Concerning Regulations that Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use This action is not a “significant energy action” as defined in Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355 (May 22, 2001)), because it is not likely to have a significant adverse effect on the***E.O. 12866 Review – Draft – Do Not Cite, Quote, or Release During Review*** Page 97 of 228 supply, distribution or use of energy. This action reduces the burden of the rule on owners and operators of stationary engines by providing less burdensome compliance demonstration methods to owners and operators and greater flexibility in the operation of emergency engines. As a result of these changes, the EPA anticipates a substantial reduction in the cost burden

associated with this rule. I. National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act Section 12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (“NTTAA”), Public Law No. 104-113, 12(d) (15 U.S.C. 272 note) directs the EPA to use voluntary consensus standards in its regulatory activities unless to do so would be inconsistent with applicable law or otherwise impractical. Voluntary consensus standards are technical standards (e.g., materials specifications, test methods, sampling procedures and business practices) that are developed or adopted by voluntary consensus standards bodies. NTTAA directs the EPA to provide Congress, through OMB, explanations when the agency decides not to use available and applicable voluntary consensus standards. This rulemaking involves technical standards. The EPA has decided to use EPA Method 25A of 40 CFR part 60, appendix A. While the agency identified two voluntary consensus standards as being potentially applicable, the EPA has decided not to use them in this rulemaking. The two candidate voluntary consensus***E.O. 12866 Review – Draft – Do Not Cite, Quote, or Release During Review*** Page 98 of 228 standards, ISO 14965:2000(E) and EN 12619 (1999), identified would not be practical due to lack of equivalency, documentation, validation data and other important technical and policy considerations. The search and review results have been documented and are placed in the docket for this final rule.

J. Executive Order 12898: Federal Actions to Address Environmental Justice in Minority Populations and Low-Income Populations Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629 (February 16, 1994)) establishes federal executive policy on environmental justice. Its main provision directs federal agencies, to the greatest extent practicable and permitted by law, to make environmental justice part of their mission by identifying and addressing, as appropriate, disproportionately high and adverse human health or environmental effects of their programs, policies and activities on minority populations and low-income populations in the United

States.

The EPA has concluded that it is not feasible to determine whether there would be disproportionately high and adverse human health or environmental effects on minority, low income or indigenous populations from this final rule, as the EPA does not have specific information about the location of the stationary RICE affected by this final rule. The EPA has taken steps to reduce the impact of the final changes for SI engines by Deleted: Formatted: Indent: First line: 0.5"

Deleted: ¶

Deleted: spark ignition***E.O. 12866 Review – Draft – Do Not Cite, Quote, or Release During Review*** Page 99 of 228 limiting the subcategory for remote engines to those that are not in populated areas. K. Congressional Review Act The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq ., as added by the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule, to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the United States. The EPA will submit a report containing this rule and other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. A Major rule cannot take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal Register . This action is a “major rule” as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2). This rule will be effective on [INSERT DATE 60 DAYS AFTER PUBLICATION IN THE FEDERAL REGISTER].***E.O. 12866 Review – Draft – Do Not Cite, Quote, or Release During Review*** National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants for Reciprocating Internal Combustion Engines; New Source Performance Standards for Stationary Internal Combustion Engines Page 100 of 228 **List of Subjects** 40 CFR part 60 Administrative practice and procedure, Air pollution control, Incorporation by reference, Intergovernmental relations, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements. 40 CFR part 63 Administrative practice and procedure, Air pollution control, Hazardous substances, Incorporation by reference, Intergovernmental relations, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.

______________________ Dated:

______________________ Lisa P. Jackson, Administrator. Deleted:

.***E.O. 12866 Review – Draft – Do Not Cite, Quote, or Release During Review*** Page 101 of 228

6560-50-P

For the reasons stated in the preamble, title 40, chapter I of the Code of Federal Regulations is amended as follows: **PART 60—[AMENDED]** 1. The authority citation for part 60 continues to read as

follows: Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401, et seq

. **Subpart A—[amended]**

2. Section 60.17 is amended by adding paragraph (r) to read

as follows: §60.17 Incorporations by reference.

* * * * * (r) The following material is available from the North American Electric Reliability Corporation, 3353 Peachtree Road NE, Suite 600, North Tower, Atlanta, GA 30326, http://www.nerc.com, and is available at the following website: http://www.nerc.com/files/EOP-002-3_1.pdf. (1) North American Electric Reliability Corporation, Reliability Standards for the Bulk of Electric Systems of North America, Reliability Standard EOP-002-3, Capacity and Energy Emergencies, updated November 19, 2012, IBR approved for §§60.4211(f) and 60.4243(d). (2) [Reserved]Page 102 of 228

**Subpart IIII—[amended]** 3. Section 60.4207 is amended by revising paragraph (b) to

read as follows: §60.4207 What fuel requirements must I meet if I am an owner or operator of a stationary CI internal combustion engine subject to this subpart?

* * * * * (b) Beginning October 1, 2010, owners and operators of stationary CI ICE subject to this subpart with a displacement of less than 30 liters per cylinder that use diesel fuel must use diesel fuel that meets the requirements of 40 CFR 80.510(b) for nonroad diesel fuel, except that any existing diesel fuel purchased (or otherwise obtained) prior to October 1, 2010, may be used until depleted.

* * * * * 4. Section 60.4211 is amended by revising paragraph (f) to

read as follows: §60.4211 What are my compliance requirements if I am an owner or operator of a stationary CI internal combustion engine?

* * * * * (f) If you own or operate an emergency stationary ICE, you must operate the emergency stationary ICE according to the requirements in paragraphs (f)(1) through (3) of this section. In order for the engine to be considered an emergency stationaryPage 103 of 228

ICE under this subpart, any operation other than emergency operation, maintenance and testing, emergency demand response, and operation in non-emergency situations for 50 hours per year, as described in paragraphs (f)(1) through (3) of this section, is prohibited. If you do not operate the engine according to the requirements in paragraphs (f)(1) through (3) of this section, the engine will not be considered an emergency engine under this subpart and must meet all requirements for non-emergency engines. (1) There is no time limit on the use of emergency stationary ICE in emergency situations. (2) You may operate your emergency stationary ICE for any combination of the purposes specified in paragraphs (f)(2)(i) through (iii) of this section for a maximum of 100 hours per calendar year. Any operation for non-emergency situations as allowed by paragraph (f)(3) of this section counts as part of the 100 hours per calendar year allowed by this paragraph (f)(2). (i) Emergency stationary ICE may be operated for maintenance checks and readiness testing, provided that the tests are recommended by federal, state or local government, the manufacturer, the vendor, the regional transmission organization or equivalent balancing authority and transmission operator, or the insurance company associated with the engine. The owner orPage 104 of 228

operator may petition the Administrator for approval of

additional hours to be used for maintenance checks and readiness testing, but a petition is not required if the owner or operator maintains records indicating that federal, state, or local standards require maintenance and testing of emergency ICE beyond 100 hours per calendar year. (ii) Emergency stationary ICE may be operated for emergency demand response for periods in which the Reliability Coordinator under the North American Electric Reliability Corporation (NERC) Reliability Standard EOP-002-3, Capacity and Energy Emergencies (incorporated by reference, see §60.17), or other authorized entity as determined by the Reliability Coordinator, has declared an Energy Emergency Alert Level 2 as defined in the NERC Reliability Standard EOP-002-3. (iii) Emergency stationary ICE may be operated for periods where there is a deviation of voltage or frequency of 5 percent or greater below standard voltage or frequency. (3) Emergency stationary ICE may be operated for up to 50 hours per calendar year in non-emergency situations. The 50 hours of operation in non-emergency situations are counted as part of the 100 hours per calendar year for maintenance and testing and emergency demand response provided in paragraph (f)(2) of this section. Except as provided in paragraph (f)(3)(i) of this section, the 50 hours per calendar year forPage 105 of 228

non-emergency situations cannot be used for peak shaving or nonemergency demand response, or to generate income for a facility to an electric grid or otherwise supply power as part of a financial arrangement with another entity. (i) The 50 hours per year for non-emergency situations can be used to supply power as part of a financial arrangement with another entity if all of the following conditions are met: (A) The engine is dispatched by the local balancing authority or local transmission and distribution system operator; (B) The dispatch is intended to mitigate local transmission and/or distribution limitations so as to avert potential voltage collapse or line overloads that could lead to the interruption of power supply in a local area or region. (C) The dispatch follows reliability, emergency operation or similar protocols that follow specific NERC, regional, state, public utility commission or local standards or guidelines. (D) The power is provided only to the facility itself or to support the local transmission and distribution system. (E) The owner or operator identifies and records the entity that dispatches the engine and the specific NERC, regional, state, public utility commission or local standards or guidelines that are being followed for dispatching the engine. The local balancing authority or local transmission andPage 106 of 228

distribution system operator may keep these records on behalf of the engine owner or operator. (ii) [Reserved]

* * * * * 5. Section 60.4214 is amended by adding paragraph (d) to

read as follows: §60.4214 What are my notification, reporting, and recordkeeping requirements if I am an owner or operator of a stationary CI internal combustion engine?

* * * * * (d) If you own or operate an emergency stationary CI ICE with a maximum engine power more than 100 HP that operates or is contractually obligated to be available for more than 15 hours per calendar year for the purposes specified in §60.4211(f)(2)(ii) and (iii) or that operates for the purposes specified in §60.4211(f)(3)(i), you must submit an annual report according to the requirements in paragraphs (d)(1) through (3)

of this section. (1) The report must contain the following information: (i) Company name and address where the engine is located. (ii) Date of the report and beginning and ending dates of the reporting period. (iii) Engine site rating and model year.Page 107 of 228

(iv) Latitude and longitude of the engine in decimal degrees reported to the fifth decimal place. (v) Hours operated for the purposes specified in §60.4211(f)(2)(ii) and (iii), including the date, start time, and end time for engine operation for the purposes specified in §60.4211(f)(2)(ii) and (iii). (vi) Number of hours the engine is contractually obligated to be available for the purposes specified in §60.4211(f)(2)(ii) and (iii). (vii) Hours spent for operation for the purposes specified in §60.4211(f)(3)(i), including the date, start time, and end time for engine operation for the purposes specified in 60.4211(f)(3)(i). The report must also identify the entity that dispatched the engine and the situation that necessitated the dispatch of the engine. (2) The first annual report must cover the calendar year 2015 and must be submitted no later than March 31, 2016. Subsequent annual reports for each calendar year must be submitted no later than March 31 of the following calendar year. (3) The annual report must be submitted electronically using the subpart specific reporting form in the Compliance and Emissions Data Reporting Interface (CEDRI) that is accessed through EPA’s Central Data Exchange (CDX) (www.epa.gov/cdx). However, if the reporting form specific to this subpart is notPage 108 of 228

available in CEDRI at the time that the report is due, the written report must be submitted to the Administrator at the appropriate address listed in §60.4. 6. Section 60.4219 is amended by revising the definition of “Emergency stationary internal combustion engine” to read as

follows: §60.4219 What definitions apply to this subpart?

* * * * * Emergency stationary internal combustion engine means any stationary reciprocating internal combustion engine that meets all of the criteria in paragraphs (1) through (3) of this definition. All emergency stationary ICE must comply with the requirements specified in §60.4211(f) in order to be considered emergency stationary ICE. If the engine does not comply with the requirements specified in §60.4211(f), then it is not considered to be an emergency stationary ICE under this subpart. (1) The stationary ICE is operated to provide electrical power or mechanical work during an emergency situation. Examples include stationary ICE used to produce power for critical networks or equipment (including power supplied to portions of a facility) when electric power from the local utility (or the normal power source, if the facility runs on its own power production) is interrupted, or stationary ICE used to pump water in the case of fire or flood, etc.Page 109 of 228

(2) The stationary ICE is operated under limited circumstances for situations not included in paragraph (1) of this definition, as specified in §60.4211(f). (3) The stationary ICE operates as part of a financial arrangement with another entity in situations not included in paragraph (1) of this definition only as allowed in §60.4211(f)(2)(ii) or (iii) and §60.4211(f)(3)(i).

* * * * * **Subpart JJJJ—[amended]** 7. Section 60.4231 is amended by revising paragraphs (b) through (d) to read as follows:

§60.4231 What emission standards must I meet if I am a manufacturer of stationary SI internal combustion engines or equipment containing such engines?

* * * * * (b) Stationary SI internal combustion engine manufacturers must certify their stationary SI ICE with a maximum engine power greater than 19 KW (25 HP) (except emergency stationary ICE with a maximum engine power greater than 25 HP and less than 130 HP) that use gasoline and that are manufactured on or after the applicable date in §60.4230(a)(2), or manufactured on or after the applicable date in §60.4230(a)(4) for emergency stationary ICE with a maximum engine power greater than or equal to 130 HP, to the certification emission standards and other requirementsPage 110 of 228

for new nonroad SI engines in 40 CFR part 1048. Stationary SI internal combustion engine manufacturers must certify their emergency stationary SI ICE with a maximum engine power greater than 25 HP and less than 130 HP that use gasoline and that are manufactured on or after the applicable date in §60.4230(a)(4) to the Phase 1 emission standards in 40 CFR 90.103, applicable to class II engines, and other requirements for new nonroad SI engines in 40 CFR part 90. Stationary SI internal combustion engine manufacturers may certify their stationary SI ICE with a maximum engine power less than or equal to 30 KW (40 HP) with a total displacement less than or equal to 1,000 cubic centimeters (cc) that use gasoline to the certification emission standards and other requirements for new nonroad SI engines in 40 CFR part 90 or 1054, as appropriate. (c) Stationary SI internal combustion engine manufacturers must certify their stationary SI ICE with a maximum engine power greater than 19 KW (25 HP) (except emergency stationary ICE with a maximum engine power greater than 25 HP and less than 130 HP) that are rich burn engines that use LPG and that are manufactured on or after the applicable date in §60.4230(a)(2) , or manufactured on or after the applicable date in §60.4230(a)(4) for emergency stationary ICE with a maximum engine power greater than or equal to 130 HP, to the certification emission standards and other requirements for newPage 111 of 228

nonroad SI engines in 40 CFR part 1048. Stationary SI internal combustion engine manufacturers must certify their emergency stationary SI ICE greater than 25 HP and less than 130 HP that are rich burn engines that use LPG and that are manufactured on or after the applicable date in §60.4230(a)(4) to the Phase 1 emission standards in 40 CFR 90.103, applicable to class II engines, and other requirements for new nonroad SI engines in 40 CFR part 90. Stationary SI internal combustion engine manufacturers may certify their stationary SI ICE with a maximum engine power less than or equal to 30 KW (40 HP) with a total displacement less than or equal to 1,000 cc that are rich burn engines that use LPG to the certification emission standards and other requirements for new nonroad SI engines in 40 CFR part 90 or 1054, as appropriate. (d) Stationary SI internal combustion engine manufacturers who choose to certify their stationary SI ICE with a maximum engine power greater than 19 KW (25 HP) and less than 75 KW (100 HP) (except gasoline and rich burn engines that use LPG and emergency stationary ICE with a maximum engine power greater than 25 HP and less than 130 HP) under the voluntary manufacturer certification program described in this subpart must certify those engines to the certification emission standards for new nonroad SI engines in 40 CFR part 1048. Stationary SI internal combustion engine manufacturers whoPage 112 of 228

choose to certify their emergency stationary SI ICE greater than 25 HP and less than 130 HP (except gasoline and rich burn engines that use LPG), must certify those engines to the Phase 1 emission standards in 40 CFR 90.103, applicable to class II engines, for new nonroad SI engines in 40 CFR part 90. Stationary SI internal combustion engine manufacturers may certify their stationary SI ICE with a maximum engine power less than or equal to 30 KW (40 HP) with a total displacement less than or equal to 1,000 cc (except gasoline and rich burn engines that use LPG) to the certification emission standards for new nonroad SI engines in 40 CFR part 90 or 1054, as appropriate. For stationary SI ICE with a maximum engine power greater than 19 KW (25 HP) and less than 75 KW (100 HP) (except gasoline and rich burn engines that use LPG and emergency stationary ICE with a maximum engine power greater than 25 HP and less than 130 HP) manufactured prior to January 1, 2011, manufacturers may choose to certify these engines to the standards in Table 1 to this subpart applicable to engines with a maximum engine power greater than or equal to 100 HP and less than 500 HP.

* * * * * 8. Section 60.4243 is amended by revising paragraph (d) to

read as follows: §60.4243 What are my compliance requirements if I am an owner or operator of a stationary SI internal combustion engine?Page 113 of 228

* * * * * (d) If you own or operate an emergency stationary ICE, you must operate the emergency stationary ICE according to the requirements in paragraphs (d)(1) through (3) of this section. In order for the engine to be considered an emergency stationary ICE under this subpart, any operation other than emergency operation, maintenance and testing, emergency demand response, and operation in non-emergency situations for 50 hours per year, as described in paragraphs (d)(1) through (3) of this section, is prohibited. If you do not operate the engine according to the requirements in paragraphs (d)(1) through (3) of this section, the engine will not be considered an emergency engine under this subpart and must meet all requirements for non-emergency engines. (1) There is no time limit on the use of emergency stationary ICE in emergency situations. (2) You may operate your emergency stationary ICE for any combination of the purposes specified in paragraphs (d)(2)(i) through (iii) of this section for a maximum of 100 hours per calendar year. Any operation for non-emergency situations as allowed by paragraph (d)(3) of this section counts as part of the 100 hours per calendar year allowed by this paragraph (d)(2).Page 114 of 228

(i) Emergency stationary ICE may be operated for maintenance checks and readiness testing, provided that the tests are recommended by federal, state or local government, the manufacturer, the vendor, the regional transmission organization or equivalent balancing authority and transmission operator, or the insurance company associated with the engine. The owner or operator may petition the Administrator for approval of

additional hours to be used for maintenance checks and readiness testing, but a petition is not required if the owner or operator maintains records indicating that federal, state, or local standards require maintenance and testing of emergency ICE beyond 100 hours per calendar year. (ii) Emergency stationary ICE may be operated for emergency demand response for periods in which the Reliability Coordinator under the North American Electric Reliability Corporation (NERC) Reliability Standard EOP-002-3, Capacity and Energy Emergencies (incorporated by reference, see §60.17), or other authorized entity as determined by the Reliability Coordinator, has declared an Energy Emergency Alert Level 2 as defined in the NERC Reliability Standard EOP-002-3. (iii) Emergency stationary ICE may be operated for periods where there is a deviation of voltage or frequency of 5 percent or greater below standard voltage or frequency.Page 115 of 228

(3) Emergency stationary ICE may be operated for up to 50 hours per calendar year in non-emergency situations. The 50 hours of operation in non-emergency situations are counted as part of the 100 hours per calendar year for maintenance and testing and emergency demand response provided in paragraph (d)(2) of this section. Except as provided in paragraph(d)(3)(i) of this section, the 50 hours per year for nonemergency situations cannot be used for peak shaving or nonemergency demand response, or to generate income for a facility to an electric grid or otherwise supply power as part of a financial arrangement with another entity. (i) The 50 hours per year for non-emergency situations can be used to supply power as part of a financial arrangement with another entity if all of the following conditions are met: (A) The engine is dispatched by the local balancing authority or local transmission and distribution system operator; (B) The dispatch is intended to mitigate local transmission and/or distribution limitations so as to avert potential voltage collapse or line overloads that could lead to the interruption of power supply in a local area or region. (C) The dispatch follows reliability, emergency operation or similar protocols that follow specific NERC, regional, state, public utility commission or local standards or guidelines.Page 116 of 228

(D) The power is provided only to the facility itself or to support the local transmission and distribution system. (E) The owner or operator identifies and records the entity that dispatches the engine and the specific NERC, regional, state, public utility commission or local standards or guidelines that are being followed for dispatching the engine. The local balancing authority or local transmission and distribution system operator may keep these records on behalf of the engine owner or operator. (ii) [Reserved]

* * * * * 9. Section 60.4245 is amended by adding paragraph (e) to

read as follows: §60.4245 What are my notification, reporting, and recordkeeping requirements if I am an owner or operator of a stationary SI internal combustion engine?

* * * * * (e) If you own or operate an emergency stationary SI ICE with a maximum engine power more than 100 HP that operates or is contractually obligated to be available for more than 15 hours per calendar year for the purposes specified in §60.4243(d)(2)(ii) and (iii) or that operates for the purposes specified in §60.4243(d)(3)(i), you must submit an annual reportPage 117 of 228

according to the requirements in paragraphs (e)(1) through (3)

of this section. (1) The report must contain the following information: (i) Company name and address where the engine is located. (ii) Date of the report and beginning and ending dates of the reporting period. (iii) Engine site rating and model year. (iv) Latitude and longitude of the engine in decimal degrees reported to the fifth decimal place. (v) Hours operated for the purposes specified in §60.4243(d)(2)(ii) and (iii), including the date, start time, and end time for engine operation for the purposes specified in §60.4243(d)(2)(ii) and (iii). (vi) Number of hours the engine is contractually obligated to be available for the purposes specified in §60.4243(d)(2)(ii) and (iii). (vii) Hours spent for operation for the purposes specified in §60.4243(d)(3)(i), including the date, start time, and end time for engine operation for the purposes specified in 60.4243(d)(3)(i). The report must also identify the entity that dispatched the engine and the situation that necessitated the dispatch of the engine. (2) The first annual report must cover the calendar year 2015 and must be submitted no later than March 31, 2016.Page 118 of 228

Subsequent annual reports for each calendar year must be submitted no later than March 31 of the following calendar year. (3) The annual report must be submitted electronically using the subpart specific reporting form in the Compliance and Emissions Data Reporting Interface (CEDRI) that is accessed through EPA’s Central Data Exchange (CDX) (www.epa.gov/cdx). However, if the reporting form specific to this subpart is not available in CEDRI at the time that the report is due, the written report must be submitted to the Administrator at the appropriate address listed in §60.4. 10. Section 60.4248 is amended by revising the definition of “Emergency stationary internal combustion engine” to read as

follows: §60.4248 What definitions apply to this subpart?

* * * * * Emergency stationary internal combustion engine means any stationary reciprocating internal combustion engine that meets all of the criteria in paragraphs (1) through (3) of this definition. All emergency stationary ICE must comply with the requirements specified in §60.4243(d) in order to be considered emergency stationary ICE. If the engine does not comply with the requirements specified in §60.4243(d), then it is not considered to be an emergency stationary ICE under this subpart.Page 119 of 228

(1) The stationary ICE is operated to provide electrical power or mechanical work during an emergency situation. Examples include stationary ICE used to produce power for critical networks or equipment (including power supplied to portions of a facility) when electric power from the local utility (or the normal power source, if the facility runs on its own power production) is interrupted, or stationary ICE used to pump water in the case of fire or flood, etc. (2) The stationary ICE is operated under limited circumstances for situations not included in paragraph (1) of this definition, as specified in §60.4243(d). (3) The stationary ICE operates as part of a financial arrangement with another entity in situations not included in paragraph (1) of this definition only as allowed in §60.4243(d)(2)(ii) or (iii) and §60.4243(d)(3)(i).

* * * * * 11. Table 2 to Subpart JJJJ of Part 60 is revised to read

as follows: **Table 2 to Subpart JJJJ of Part 60 –- Requirements for Performance Tests**  As stated in §60.4244, you must comply with the following requirements for performance tests within 10 percent of 100 percent peak (or the highest achievable) load: **For each Complying with the**  **requirement to**  **You must Using According to the**  **following requirement** Page 120 of 228

**s** 1. Stationary SI internal combustion engine demonstrati ng compliance according to §60.4244. a. limit the concentrati on of NO x in the stationary SI internal combustion engine exhaust i. Select the sampling port location and the number of traverse points; ( 1) Method 1 or 1A of 4 0 CFR part 60, Appendix A or ASTM Method D6522- 00(Reapprov ed 2005) a,

e

. (a) If using a control d evice, the sampling site must be located at the outlet of t he control device. ii. Determine the O 2 concentrati on of the stationary internal combustion engine exhaust at the sampling port location; (2) Method 3, 3A, or 3B b of 40 CFR part 60, appendix A or ASTM Method D6522- 00(Reapprov ed 2005) a,

e

. (b) Measurement s to determine O 2 concentrati on must be m a de at the same time as the measurement s for NO x concentrati on. iii. If necessary, determine the exhaust flowrate of the stationary internal combustion engine exhaust; (3) Method 2 or 19 of 4 0 CFR part 60, appendix A

.Page 121 of 228

iv. If necessary, measure moisture content of the stationary internal combustion engine exhaust at the sampling port location; and ( 4) Method 4 of 40 CFR part 60, a ppendix A, Method 320 of 40 CFR part 63, a ppendix A, or ASTM D 6348-03 e

. (c) Measurement s to determine moisture must be m ade at the same time as the measurement for NO x concentrati on.

v. Measure NO x at the exhaust of the stationary internal combustion engine. ( 5) Method 7E of 40 CFR part 60, a ppendix A, Method D6522- 00(Reapprov ed 2005) a,

e , Method 320 of 40 CFR part 63, a ppendix A, or ASTM D 6348-03 e

. ( d) Results of this test consist of t he average of the three 1- hour or longer runs.

b. limit the concentrati on of CO in the stationary SI internal combustion engine exhaust i. Select the sampling port location and the number of traverse points; ( 1) Method 1 or 1A of 4 0 CFR part 60, appendix A or ASTM Method D6522- 00(Reapprov ed 2005) a,e

. (a) If using a control d evice, the sampling site must be located at the outlet of t he control device.Page 122 of 228

ii. Determine the O 2 concentrati on of the stationary internal combustion engine exhaust at the sampling port location; (2) Method 3, 3A, or 3B b of 40 CFR part 60, appendix A or ASTM Method D6522- 00(Reapprov ed 2005) a,e

. (b) Measurement s to determine O 2 concentrati on must be ma d e at the same time as the measurement s for CO concentrati on. iii. If necessary, determine the exhaust flowrate of the stationary internal combustion engine exhaust; (3) Method 2 or 19 of 4 0 CFR part 60, appendix A

.

iv. If necessary, measure moisture content of the stationary internal combustion engine exhaust at the sampling port location; and ( 4) Method 4 of 40 CFR part 60, a ppendix A, Method 320 of 40 CFR part 63, a ppendix A, or ASTM D 6348-03 e

. (c) Measurement s to determine moisture must be m ade at the same time as the measurement for CO concentrati on.Page 123 of 228

v. Measure CO at the exhaust of the stationary internal combustion engine. ( 5) Method 10 of 40 CFR part 60, a ppendix A, A STM Method D6522- 00(Reapprov ed 2005) a,e , Method 320 of 40 CFR part 63, a ppendix A, or ASTM D 6348-03 e

. ( d) Results of this test consist of t he average of the three 1- hour or longer runs.

c. limit the concentrati on of VOC in the stationary SI internal combustion engine exhaust i. Select the sampling port location and the number of traverse points; ( 1) Method 1 or 1A of 4 0 CFR part 60, appendix A. (a) If using a control d evice, the sampling site must be located at the outlet of t he control device. ii. Determine the O 2 concentrati on of the stationary internal combustion engine exhaust at the sampling port location; (2) Method 3, 3A, or 3B b of 40 CFR part 60, appendix A or ASTM Method D6522- 00(Reapprov ed 2005) a,e

. (b) Measurement s to determine O 2 concentrati on must be m a de at the same time as the measurement s for VOC concentrati on.Page 124 of 228

iii. If necessary, determine the exhaust flowrate of the stationary internal combustion engine exhaust; (3) Method 2 or 19 of 4 0 CFR part 60, appendix A

.

iv. If necessary, measure moisture content of the stationary internal combustion engine exhaust at the sampling port location; and ( 4) Method 4 of 40 CFR part 60, a ppendix A, Method 320 of 40 CFR part 63, a ppendix A, or ASTM D 6348-03 e

. (c) Measurement s to determine moisture must be m ade at the same time as the measurement for VOC concentrati on.Page 125 of 228

v. Measure VOC at the exhaust of the stationary internal combustion engine. (5) M ethods 25A and 18 of 4 0 CFR part 60, a ppendix A, Method 25A with the use of a methane cutter as described in 40 CFR 1065.265, Method 18 of 40 CFR part 60, appendix A c,d , Method 320 of 40 CFR part 63, a ppendix A, or ASTM D 6348-03 e

. ( d) Results of this test consist of t he average of the three 1- hour or longer runs.

a You may petition the Administrator for approval to use alternative methods for portable analyzer. b You may use ASME PTC 19.10-1981, Flue and Exhaust Gas Analyses, for measuring the O 2 content of the exhaust gas as an alternative to EPA Method 3B.

c You may use EPA Method 18 of 40 CFR part 60, appendix A, provided that you conduct an adequate presurvey test prior to the emissions test, such as the one described in OTM 11 on EPA’s website (http://www.epa.gov/ttn/emc/prelim/otm11.pdf). d You may use ASTM D6420-99 (2004), Test Method for Determination of Gaseous Organic Compounds by Direct Interface Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectrometry as an alternative to EPA Method 18 for measuring total nonmethane organic.

e Incorporated by reference, see 40 CFR 60.17.

**PART 63--[AMENDED]** 12. The authority citation for part 63 continues to read as

follows:Page 126 of 228

Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401, et seq

. **Subpart A--[amended]** 13. Section 63.14 is amended by: a. Revising paragraphs (b)(28) and (b)(54); b. Adding paragraph (d)(10); c. Revising paragraph (i)(1); and d. Adding paragraph (s) to read as follows: §63.14 Incorporations by reference.

* * * * * (b) * * * (28) ASTM D6420-99 (Reapproved 2004), Standard Test Method for Determination of Gaseous Organic Compounds by Direct Interface Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry (Approved October 1, 2004), IBR approved for §§ 60.485(g), 60.485a(g), 63.457(b), 63.772(a) and (e), 63.1282(a) and (d), 63.2351(b), 63.2354(b) and table 8 to subpart HHHHHHH of this part.

* * * * * (54) ASTM D6348-03, Standard Test Method for Determination of Gaseous Compounds by Extractive Direct Interface Fourier Transform Infrared (FTIR) Spectroscopy, approved 2003, IBR approved for §§ 63.457, 63.1349, table 4 to subpart DDDD of this part, table 4 to subpart ZZZZ of this part, and table 8 to subpart HHHHHHH of this part.

* * * * *Page 127 of 228

(d) * * * (10) Alaska Statute, Title 42 – Public Utilities And Carriers And Energy Programs, Chapter 45 – Rural and Statewide Energy Programs, Article 1, Power Assistance Programs, Sec. 42.45.045. Renewable energy grant fund and recommendation program, effective May 3, 2012, available at http://www.legis.state.ak.us/basis/folio.asp, IBR approved for

§63.6675.

* * * * * (i) * * * (1) ANSI/ASME PTC 19.10-1981, Flue and Exhaust Gas Analyses [Part 10, Instruments and Apparatus], issued August 31, 1981, IBR approved for §§ 63.309(k), 63.457(k), 63.772(e) and (h), 63.865(b), 63.1282(d) and (g), 63.3166(a), 63.3360(e), 63.3545(a), 63.3555(a), 63.4166(a), 63.4362(a), 63.4766(a), 63.4965(a), 63.5160(d), 63.9307(c), 63.9323(a), 63.11148(e), 63.11155(e), 63.11162(f), 63.11163(g), 63.11410(j), 63.11551(a), 63.11646(a), 63.11945, table 5 to subpart DDDDD of this part, table 4 to subpart JJJJJ of this part, table 5 to subpart UUUUU of this part, and table 1 to subpart ZZZZZ of this part.

* * * * * (s) The following material is available from the North American Electric Reliability Corporation, 3353 Peachtree Road NE, Suite 600, North Tower, Atlanta, GA 30326,Page 128 of 228

http://www.nerc.com, and is available at the following website: http://www.nerc.com/files/EOP-002-3_1.pdf. (1) North American Electric Reliability Corporation, Reliability Standards for the Bulk of Electric Systems of North America, Reliability Standard EOP-002-3, Capacity and Energy Emergencies, updated November 19, 2012, IBR approved for §63.6640(f). (2) [Reserved] **Subpart ZZZZ--[amended]** 14. Section 63.6585 is amended by adding paragraph (f) to

read as follows: §63.6585 Am I subject to this subpart?

* * * * * (f) The emergency stationary RICE listed in paragraphs (f)(1) through (3) of this section are not subject to this subpart. The stationary RICE must meet the definition of an emergency stationary RICE in §63.6675, which includes operating according to the provisions specified in §63.6640(f). (1) Existing residential emergency stationary RICE located at an area source of HAP emissions that do not operate or are not contractually obligated to be available for than 15 hours per calendar year for the purposes specified in §63.6640(f)(2)(ii) and (iii) and that do not operate for the purpose specified in §63.6640(f)(4)(ii).Page 129 of 228

(2) Existing commercial emergency stationary RICE located at an area source of HAP emissions that do not operate or are not contractually obligated to be available for more than 15 hours per calendar year for the purposes specified in §63.6640(f)(2)(ii) and (iii) and that do not operate for the purpose specified in §63.6640(f)(4)(ii). (3) Existing institutional emergency stationary RICE located at an area source of HAP emissions that do not operate or are not contractually obligated to be available for more than 15 hours per calendar year for the purposes specified in §63.6640(f)(2)(ii) and (iii) and that do not operate for the purpose specified in §63.6640(f)(4)(ii). 15. Section 63.6590 is amended by revising paragraph (b)(1)(i) and (b)(3)(iii) and removing paragraphs (b)(3)(vi) through (viii) to read as follows. §63.6590 What parts of my plant does this subpart cover?

* * * * * (b) * * * (1) * * * (i) The stationary RICE is a new or reconstructed emergency stationary RICE with a site rating of more than 500 brake HP located at a major source of HAP emissions that does not operate or is not contractually obligated to be available for more thanPage 130 of 228

15 hours per calendar year for the purposes specified in §63.6640(f)(2)(ii) and (iii).

* * * * * (3) * * * (iii) Existing emergency stationary RICE with a site rating of more than 500 brake HP located at a major source of HAP emissions that does not operate or is not contractually obligated to be available for more than 15 hours per calendar year for the purposes specified in §63.6640(f)(2)(ii) and (iii).

* * * * * 16. Section 63.6595 is amended by revising paragraph (a)(1)

to read as follows: §63.6595 When do I have to comply with this subpart? (a) * * * (1) If you have an existing stationary RICE, excluding existing non-emergency CI stationary RICE, with a site rating of more than 500 brake HP located at a major source of HAP emissions, you must comply with the applicable emission limitations, operating limitations and other requirements no later than June 15, 2007. If you have an existing non-emergency CI stationary RICE with a site rating of more than 500 brake HP located at a major source of HAP emissions, an existing stationary CI RICE with a site rating of less than or equal to 500 brake HP located at a major source of HAP emissions, or anPage 131 of 228

existing stationary CI RICE located at an area source of HAP emissions, you must comply with the applicable emission limitations, operating limitations, and other requirements no later than May 3, 2013. If you have an existing stationary SI RICE with a site rating of less than or equal to 500 brake HP located at a major source of HAP emissions, or an existing stationary SI RICE located at an area source of HAP emissions, you must comply with the applicable emission limitations, operating limitations, and other requirements no later than October 19, 2013.

* * * * *

17. Section 63.6602 is revised to read as follows: §63.6602 What emission limitations and other requirements must I meet if I own or operate an existing stationary RICE with a site rating of equal to or less than 500 brake HP located at a major source of HAP emissions? If you own or operate an existing stationary RICE with a site rating of equal to or less than 500 brake HP located at a major source of HAP emissions, you must comply with the emission limitations and other requirements in Table 2c to this subpart which apply to you. Compliance with the numerical emission limitations established in this subpart is based on the results of testing the average of three 1-hour runs using the testingPage 132 of 228

requirements and procedures in §63.6620 and Table 4 to this subpart. 18. Section 63.6603 is amended by: a. Revising the section heading; b. Revising paragraph (a); c. Revising paragraph (b); and d. Adding paragraphs (c) through (f) to read as follows: §63.6603 What emission limitations, operating limitations, and other requirements must I meet if I own or operate an existing stationary RICE located at an area source of HAP emissions?

* * * * * (a) If you own or operate an existing stationary RICE located at an area source of HAP emissions, you must comply with the requirements in Table 2d to this subpart and the operating limitations in Table 2b to this subpart that apply to you.(b) If you own or operate an existing stationary nonemergency CI RICE with a site rating of more than 300 HP located at an area source of HAP that meets either paragraph (b)(1) or (b)(2) of this section, you do not have to meet the numerical CO emission limitations specified in Table 2d of this subpart. Existing stationary non-emergency CI RICE with a site rating of

more than 300 HP located at an area source of HAP that meet either paragraph (b)(1) or (b)(2) of this section must meet the management practices that are shown for stationary non-emergencyPage 133 of 228

CI RICE with a site rating of less than or equal to 300 HP in Table 2d of this subpart. (1) The area source is located in an area of Alaska that is not accessible by the Federal Aid Highway System (FAHS). (2) The stationary RICE is located at an area source that meets paragraphs (b)(2)(i), (b)(2)(ii), and (b)(2)(iii) of this

section. (i) The only connection to the FAHS is through the Alaska Marine Highway System (AMHS), or the stationary RICE operation is within an isolated grid in Alaska that is not connected to the statewide electrical grid referred to as the Alaska Railbelt

Grid. (ii) At least 10 percent of the power generated by the stationary RICE on an annual basis is used for residential

purposes. (iii) The generating capacity of the area source is less than 12 megawatts, or the stationary RICE is used exclusively for backup power for renewable energy.(c) If you own or operate an existing stationary nonemergency CI RICE with a site rating of more than 300 HP located

on an offshore vessel that is an area source of HAP and is a nonroad vehicle that is an Outer Continental Shelf (OCS) source as defined in 40 CFR 55.2, you do not have to meet the numericalPage 134 of 228

CO emission limitations specified in Table 2d of this subpart. You must meet all of the following management practices: (1) Change oil every 1,000 hours of operation or annually, whichever comes first. Sources have the option to utilize an oil analysis program as described in §63.6625(i) in order to extend the specified oil change requirement. (2) Inspect and clean air filters every 750 hours of operation or annually, whichever comes first, and replace as

necessary. (3) Inspect fuel filters and belts, if installed, every 750 hours of operation or annually, whichever comes first, and replace as necessary. (4) Inspect all flexible hoses every 1,000 hours of operation or annually, whichever comes first, and replace as

necessary. (d) If you own or operate an existing non-emergency CI RICE with a site rating of more than 300 HP located at an area source

of HAP emissions that is certified to the Tier 1 or Tier 2

emission standards in Table 1 of 40 CFR 89.112 and that is subject to an enforceable state or local standard that requires the engine to be replaced no later than June 1, 2018, you may until January 1, 2015, or 12 years after the installation date of the engine (whichever is later), but not later than June 1, 2018, choose to comply with the management practices that arePage 135 of 228

shown for stationary non-emergency CI RICE with a site rating of less than or equal to 300 HP in Table 2d of this subpart instead of the applicable emission limitations in Table 2d, operating limitations in Table 2b, and crankcase ventilation system requirements in §63.6625(g). You must comply with the emission limitations in Table 2d and operating limitations in Table 2b that apply for non-emergency CI RICE with a site rating of more than 300 HP located at an area source of HAP emissions by January 1, 2015, or 12 years after the installation date of the engine (whichever is later), but not later than June 1, 2018. You must also comply with the crankcase ventilation system requirements in §63.6625(g) by January 1, 2015, or 12 years after the installation date of the engine (whichever is later), but not later than June 1, 2018. (e) If you own or operate an existing non-emergency CI RICE with a site rating of more than 300 HP located at an area source of HAP emissions that is certified to the Tier 3 (Tier 2 for engines above 560 kilowatt (kW)) emission standards in Table 1 of 40 CFR 89.112, you may comply with the requirements under this part by meeting the requirements for Tier 3 engines (Tier 2 for engines above 560 kW) in 40 CFR part 60 subpart IIII instead of the emission limitations and other requirements that would otherwise apply under this part for existing non-emergency CIPage 136 of 228

RICE with a site rating of more than 300 HP located at an area

source of HAP emissions. (f) An existing non-emergency SI 4SLB and 4SRB stationary RICE with a site rating of more than 500 HP located at area sources of HAP must meet the definition of remote stationary RICE in §63.6675 on the initial compliance date for the engine, October 19, 2013, in order to be considered a remote stationaryRICE under this subpart. Owners and operators of existing nonemergency SI 4SLB and 4SRB stationary RICE with a site rating of

more than 500 HP located at area sources of HAP that meet the definition of remote stationary RICE in §63.6675 of this subpart as of October 19, 2013 must evaluate the status of their stationary RICE every 12 months. Owners and operators must keep

records of the initial and annual evaluation of the status of the engine. If the evaluation indicates that the stationary RICE no longer meets the definition of remote stationary RICE in §63.6675 of this subpart, the owner or operator must comply with all of the requirements for existing non-emergency SI 4SLB and 4SRB stationary RICE with a site rating of more than 500 HP located at area sources of HAP that are not remote stationary RICE within 1 year of the evaluation.

19. Section 63.6604 is revised to read as follows: §63.6604 What fuel requirements must I meet if I own or operate a stationary CI RICE?Page 137 of 228

(a) If you own or operate an existing non-emergency, nonblack start CI stationary RICE with a site rating of more than 300 brake HP with a displacement of less than 30 liters per cylinder that uses diesel fuel, you must use diesel fuel that meets the requirements in 40 CFR 80.510(b) for nonroad diesel

fuel. (b) Beginning January 1, 2015, if you own or operate an existing emergency CI stationary RICE with a site rating of more than 100 brake HP and a displacement of less than 30 liters per cylinder that uses diesel fuel and operates or is contractually obligated to be available for more than 15 hours per calendar year for the purposes specified in §63.6640(f)(2)(ii) and (iii) or that operates for the purpose specified in §63.6640(f)(4)(ii), you must use diesel fuel that meets the requirements in 40 CFR 80.510(b) for nonroad diesel fuel, except that any existing diesel fuel purchased (or otherwise obtained) prior to January 1, 2015, may be used until depleted. (c) Beginning January 1, 2015, if you own or operate a new emergency CI stationary RICE with a site rating of more than 500 brake HP and a displacement of less than 30 liters per cylinder located at a major source of HAP that uses diesel fuel and operates or is contractually obligated to be available for more than 15 hours per calendar year for the purposes specified in §63.6640(f)(2)(ii) and (iii), you must use diesel fuel thatPage 138 of 228

meets the requirements in 40 CFR 80.510(b) for nonroad diesel fuel, except that any existing diesel fuel purchased (or otherwise obtained) prior to January 1, 2015, may be used until depleted. (d) Existing CI stationary RICE located in Guam, American Samoa, the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands, at area sources in areas of Alaska that meet either §63.6603(b)(1) or §63.6603(b)(2), or are on offshore vessels that meet §63.6603(c) are exempt from the requirements of this section. 20. Section 63.6605 is amended by revising paragraph (a) to

read as follows: §63.6605 What are my general requirements for complying with this subpart? (a) You must be in compliance with the emission limitations, operating limitations, and other requirements in this subpart that apply to you at all times.

* * * * * 21. Section 63.6620 is amended by revising paragraphs (b), (d) and (e) to read as follows: §63.6620 What performance tests and other procedures must I

use?

* * * * * (b) Each performance test must be conducted according to the requirements that this subpart specifies in Table 4 to thisPage 139 of 228

subpart. If you own or operate a non-operational stationary RICE that is subject to performance testing, you do not need to start up the engine solely to conduct the performance test. Owners and operators of a non-operational engine can conduct the performance test when the engine is started up again. The test must be conducted at any load condition within plus or minus 10 percent of 100 percent load for the stationary RICE listed in paragraphs (b)(1) through (4) of this section. (1) Non-emergency 4SRB stationary RICE with a site rating of greater than 500 brake HP located at a major source of HAP

emissions. (2) New non-emergency 4SLB stationary RICE with a site rating of greater than or equal to 250 brake HP located at a major source of HAP emissions. (3) New non-emergency 2SLB stationary RICE with a site rating of greater than 500 brake HP located at a major source of

HAP emissions. (4) New non-emergency CI stationary RICE with a site rating of greater than 500 brake HP located at a major source of HAP

emissions.

* * * * * (d) You must conduct three separate test runs for each performance test required in this section, as specified inPage 140 of 228

§63.7(e)(3). Each test run must last at least 1 hour, unless otherwise specified in this subpart. (e)(1) You must use Equation 1 of this section to determine

compliance with the percent reduction requirement:

Where:

C i = concentration of carbon monoxide (CO), total hydrocarbons (THC), or formaldehyde at the control device inlet, C o = concentration of CO, THC , or formaldehyde at the control device outlet, and R = percent reduction of CO, THC , or formaldehyde emissions.

(2) You must normalize the CO, THC, or formaldehyde

concentrations at the inlet and outlet of the control device to a dry basis and to 15 percent oxygen, or an equivalent percent carbon dioxide (CO 2 ). If pollutant concentrations are to be corrected to 15 percent oxygen and CO 2 concentration is measured in lieu of oxygen concentration measurement, a CO 2 correction

factor is needed. Calculate the CO 2 correction factor as described in paragraphs (e)(2)(i) through (iii) of this section. (i) Calculate the fuel-specific F o value for the fuel burned during the test using values obtained from Method 19, Section 5.2, and the following equation: C i - C o

C i x 100 = R ( Eq . 1)

Deleted: ) (non-methane

Deleted: (non-methane),

Deleted: ( non - m ethane),Page 141 of 228

Where:

F o = Fuel factor based on the ratio of oxygen volume to the ultimate CO 2 volume produced by the fuel at zero percent excess air. 0.209 = Fraction of air that is oxygen, percent/100. F d = Ratio of the volume of dry effluent gas to the gross calorific value of the fuel from Method 19, dsm 3 /J (dscf/10 6 Btu). F c = Ratio of the volume of CO 2 produced to the gross calorific value of the fuel from Method 19, dsm 3 /J (dscf/10 6 Btu) (ii) Calculate the CO 2 correction factor for correcting

measurement data to 15 percent O 2 , as follows: Where:

X co2 = CO 2 correction factor, percent. 5.9 = 20.9 percent O 2 - 15 percent O 2 , the defined O 2 correction value, percent. (iii) Calculate the CO, THC , and formaldehyde gas concentrations adjusted to 15 percent O 2 using CO 2 as follows:

Where:

C adj = Calculated concentration of CO, THC , or formaldehyde adjusted to 15 percent O 2. C d = Measured concentration of CO, THC , or formaldehyde, uncorrected. X CO2 = CO 2 correction factor, percent. %CO 2 = Measured CO 2 concentration measured, dry basis, percent. F o = 0.209 F d F c ( Eq . 2)

X CO2 = 5.9 F o ( Eq . 3)

C adj = C d X CO2 % CO 2 ( Eq . 4) Deleted: ( non - m ethane),

Deleted: (non-methane),

Deleted: (non-methane),Page 142 of 228

* * * * * 22. Section 63.6625 is amended by: a. Revising the first sentence in paragraph (a); b. Revising the first sentence in paragraph (b); c. Revising paragraph (b)(1)(iv); d. Revising paragraph (e)(6), e. Revising paragraph (g), f. Revising paragraph (i); and g. Revising paragraph (j) to read as follows: §63.6625 What are my monitoring, installation, collection, operation, and maintenance requirements? (a) If you elect to install a CEMS as specified in Table 5 of this subpart, you must install, operate, and maintain a CEMS

to monitor CO and either O 2 or CO 2 according to the requirements in paragraphs (a)(1) through (4) of this section. If you are meeting a requirement to reduce CO emissions, the CEMS must be

installed at both the inlet and outlet of the control device. If you are meeting a requirement to limit the concentration of CO,

the CEMS must be installed at the outlet of the control device.

* * *

* * * * * (b) If you are required to install a continuous parameter monitoring system (CPMS) as specified in Table 5 of this subpart, you must install, operate, and maintain each CPMSPage 143 of 228

according to the requirements in paragraphs (b)(1) through (6)

of this section. * * *

* * * * * (iv) Ongoing operation and maintenance procedures in accordance with provisions in §63.8(c)(1)(ii) and (c)(3); and

* * * * * (e) * * * (6) An existing non-emergency, non-black start stationary

RICE located at an area source of HAP emissions which combusts landfill or digester gas equivalent to 10 percent or more of the gross heat input on an annual basis.

* * * * *(g) If you own or operate an existing non-emergency, nonblack start CI engine greater than or equal to 300 HP that is not equipped with a closed crankcase ventilation system, you must comply with either paragraph (g)(1) or paragraph (g)(2) of this section. Owners and operators must follow the manufacturer’s specified maintenance requirements for operating and maintaining the open or closed crankcase ventilation systems and replacing the crankcase filters, or can request the Administrator to approve different maintenance requirements that are as protective as manufacturer requirements. Existing CI engines located at area sources in areas of Alaska that meet either §63.6603(b)(1) or §63.6603(b)(2) do not have to meet thePage 144 of 228

requirements of paragraph (g) of this section. Existing CI engines located on offshore vessels that meet §63.6603(c) do not have to meet the requirements of paragraph (g) of this section. (1) Install a closed crankcase ventilation system that prevents crankcase emissions from being emitted to the atmosphere, or (2) Install an open crankcase filtration emission control system that reduces emissions from the crankcase by filtering the exhaust stream to remove oil mist, particulates and metals.

* * * * * (i) If you own or operate a stationary CI engine that is subject to the work, operation or management practices in items 1 or 2 of Table 2c to this subpart or in items 1 or 4 of Table 2d to this subpart, you have the option of utilizing an oil analysis program in order to extend the specified oil change requirement in Tables 2c and 2d to this subpart. The oil analysis must be performed at the same frequency specified for changing the oil in Table 2c or 2d to this subpart. The analysis program must at a minimum analyze the following three parameters: Total Base Number, viscosity, and percent water content. The condemning limits for these parameters are as follows: Total Base Number is less than 30 percent of the Total Base Number of the oil when new; viscosity of the oil has changed by more than 20 percent from the viscosity of the oilPage 145 of 228

when new; or percent water content (by volume) is greater than 0.5. If all of these condemning limits are not exceeded, the engine owner or operator is not required to change the oil. If any of the limits are exceeded, the engine owner or operator must change the oil within 2 business days of receiving the results of the analysis; if the engine is not in operation when the results of the analysis are received, the engine owner or operator must change the oil within 2 business days or before commencing operation, whichever is later. The owner or operator must keep records of the parameters that are analyzed as part of the program, the results of the analysis, and the oil changes for the engine. The analysis program must be part of the maintenance plan for the engine. (j) If you own or operate a stationary SI engine that is subject to the work, operation or management practices in items 6, 7, or 8 of Table 2c to this subpart or in items 5, 6, 7, 9, or 11 of Table 2d to this subpart, you have the option of utilizing an oil analysis program in order to extend the specified oil change requirement in Tables 2c and 2d to this subpart. The oil analysis must be performed at the same frequency specified for changing the oil in Table 2c or 2d to this subpart. The analysis program must at a minimum analyze the following three parameters: Total Acid Number, viscosity, and percent water content. The condemning limits for thesePage 146 of 228

parameters are as follows: Total Acid Number increases by more than 3.0 milligrams of potassium hydroxide (KOH) per gram from Total Acid Number of the oil when new; viscosity of the oil has changed by more than 20 percent from the viscosity of the oil when new; or percent water content (by volume) is greater than 0.5. If all of these condemning limits are not exceeded, the engine owner or operator is not required to change the oil. If any of the limits are exceeded, the engine owner or operator must change the oil within 2 business days of receiving the results of the analysis; if the engine is not in operation when the results of the analysis are received, the engine owner or operator must change the oil within 2 business days or before commencing operation, whichever is later. The owner or operator must keep records of the parameters that are analyzed as part of the program, the results of the analysis, and the oil changes for the engine. The analysis program must be part of the maintenance plan for the engine. 23. Section 63.6630 is amended by: a. Revising the section heading; b. Revising paragraph (a); c. Adding paragraph (d); and d. Adding paragraph (e) to read as follows:Page 147 of 228

§63.6630 How do I demonstrate initial compliance with the emission limitations, operating limitations, and other requirements? (a) You must demonstrate initial compliance with each emission limitation, operating limitation, and other requirement that applies to you according to Table 5 of this subpart.

* * * * * (d) Non-emergency 4SRB stationary RICE complying with the requirement to reduce formaldehyde emissions by 76 percent or more can demonstrate initial compliance with the formaldehyde emission limit by testing for THC instead of formaldehyde. The testing must be conducted according to the requirements in Table 4 of this subpart. The average reduction of emissions of THC determined from the performance test must be equal to or greater than 30 percent. (e) The initial compliance demonstration required for existing non-emergency 4SLB and 4SRB stationary RICE with a site rating of more than 500 HP located at an area source of HAP that are not remote stationary RICE and that are operated more than 24 hours per calendar year must be conducted according to the following requirements: (1) The compliance demonstration must consist of at least

three test runs.Page 148 of 228

(2) Each test run must be of at least 15 minute duration, except that each test conducted using the method in appendix A to this subpart must consist of at least one measurement cycle and include at least 2 minutes of test data phase measurement. (3) If you are demonstrating compliance with the CO concentration or CO percent reduction requirement, you must measure CO emissions using one of the CO measurement methods specified in Table 4 of this subpart, or using appendix A to this subpart. (4) If you are demonstrating compliance with the THC percent reduction requirement, you must measure THC emissions using Method 25A, reported as propane, of 40 CFR part 60, appendix A. (5) You must measure O 2 using one of the O 2 measurement methods specified in Table 4 of this subpart. Measurements to

determine O 2 concentration must be made at the same time as the

measurements for CO or THC concentration. (6) If you are demonstrating compliance with the CO or THC percent reduction requirement, you must measure CO or THC

emissions and O 2 emissions simultaneously at the inlet and outlet

of the control device. 24. Section 63.6640 is amended by: a. Amending the section heading; b. Revising paragraph (a);Page 149 of 228

c. Revising paragraph (c); and d. Revising paragraph (f) to read as follows: §63.6640 How do I demonstrate continuous compliance with the emission limitations, operating limitations, and other requirements? (a) You must demonstrate continuous compliance with each emission limitation, operating limitation, and other requirements in Tables 1a and 1b, Tables 2a and 2b, Table 2c, and Table 2d to this subpart that apply to you according to methods specified in Table 6 to this subpart.

* * * * * (c) The annual compliance demonstration required for existing non-emergency 4SLB and 4SRB stationary RICE with a site rating of more than 500 HP located at an area source of HAP that are not remote stationary RICE and that are operated more than 24 hours per calendar year must be conducted according to the following requirements: (1) The compliance demonstration must consist of at least

one test run. (2) Each test run must be of at least 15 minute duration, except that each test conducted using the method in appendix A to this subpart must consist of at least one measurement cycle and include at least 2 minutes of test data phase measurement.Page 150 of 228

(3) If you are demonstrating compliance with the CO concentration or CO percent reduction requirement, you must measure CO emissions using one of the CO measurement methods specified in Table 4 of this subpart, or using appendix A to this subpart. (4) If you are demonstrating compliance with the THC percent reduction requirement, you must measure THC emissions using Method 25A, reported as propane, of 40 CFR part 60, appendix A. (5) You must measure O 2 using one of the O 2 measurement methods specified in Table 4 of this subpart. Measurements to

determine O 2 concentration must be made at the same time as the

measurements for CO or THC concentration. (6) If you are demonstrating compliance with the CO or THC percent reduction requirement, you must measure CO or THC

emissions and O 2 emissions simultaneously at the inlet and outlet

of the control device. (7) If the results of the annual compliance demonstration show that the emissions exceed the levels specified in Table 6 of this subpart, the stationary RICE must be shut down as soon as safely possible, and appropriate corrective action must be taken (e.g., repairs, catalyst cleaning, catalyst replacement). The stationary RICE must be retested within 7 days of being restarted and the emissions must meet the levels specified inPage 151 of 228

Table 6 of this subpart. If the retest shows that the emissions continue to exceed the specified levels, the stationary RICE must again be shut down as soon as safely possible, and the stationary RICE may not operate, except for purposes of startup and testing, until the owner/operator demonstrates through testing that the emissions do not exceed the levels specified in Table 6 of this subpart.

* * * * * (f) If you own or operate an emergency stationary RICE, you must operate the emergency stationary RICE according to the requirements in paragraphs (f)(1) through (4) of this section. In order for the engine to be considered an emergency stationary RICE under this subpart, any operation other than emergency operation, maintenance and testing, emergency demand response, and operation in non-emergency situations for 50 hours per year, as described in paragraphs (f)(1) through (4) of this section, is prohibited. If you do not operate the engine according to the requirements in paragraphs (f)(1) through (4) of this section, the engine will not be considered an emergency engine under this subpart and must meet all requirements for non-emergency engines. (1) There is no time limit on the use of emergency stationary RICE in emergency situations.Page 152 of 228

(2) You may operate your emergency stationary RICE for any combination of the purposes specified in paragraphs (f)(2)(i) through (iii) of this section for a maximum of 100 hours per calendar year. Any operation for non-emergency situations as allowed by paragraphs (f)(3) and (4) of this section counts as part of the 100 hours per calendar year allowed by this paragraph (f)(2). (i) Emergency stationary RICE may be operated for maintenance checks and readiness testing, provided that the tests are recommended by federal, state or local government, the manufacturer, the vendor, the regional transmission organization or equivalent balancing authority and transmission operator, or the insurance company associated with the engine. The owner or operator may petition the Administrator for approval of

additional hours to be used for maintenance checks and readiness testing, but a petition is not required if the owner or operator maintains records indicating that federal, state, or local standards require maintenance and testing of emergency RICE beyond 100 hours per calendar year. (ii) Emergency stationary RICE may be operated for emergency demand response for periods in which the Reliability Coordinator under the North American Electric Reliability Corporation (NERC) Reliability Standard EOP-002-3, Capacity and Energy Emergencies (incorporated by reference, see §63.14), orPage 153 of 228

other authorized entity as determined by the Reliability Coordinator, has declared an Energy Emergency Alert Level 2 as defined in the NERC Reliability Standard EOP-002-3. (iii) Emergency stationary RICE may be operated for periods where there is a deviation of voltage or frequency of 5 percent or greater below standard voltage or frequency. (3) Emergency stationary RICE located at major sources ofHAP may be operated for up to 50 hours per calendar year in nonemergency situations. The 50 hours of operation in non-emergency situations are counted as part of the 100 hours per calendar year for maintenance and testing and emergency demand response provided in paragraph (f)(2) of this section. The 50 hours per year for non-emergency situations cannot be used for peak shaving or non-emergency demand response, or to generate income for a facility to supply power to an electric grid or otherwise supply power as part of a financial arrangement with another entity. (4) Emergency stationary RICE located at area sources ofHAP may be operated for up to 50 hours per calendar year in nonemergency situations. The 50 hours of operation in non-emergency situations are counted as part of the 100 hours per calendar year for maintenance and testing and emergency demand response provided in paragraph (f)(2) of this section. Except as provided in paragraphs (f)(4)(i) and (ii) of this section, the 50 hoursPage 154 of 228

per year for non-emergency situations cannot be used for peak shaving or non-emergency demand response, or to generate income for a facility to an electric grid or otherwise supply power as part of a financial arrangement with another entity.(i) Prior to May 3, 2014, the 50 hours per year for nonemergency situations can be used for peak shaving or nonemergency demand response to generate income for a facility, or to otherwise supply power as part of a financial arrangement with another entity if the engine is operated as part of a peak shaving (load management program) with the local distribution system operator and the power is provided only to the facility itself or to support the local distribution system. (ii) The 50 hours per year for non-emergency situations can be used to supply power as part of a financial arrangement with another entity if all of the following conditions are met: (A) The engine is dispatched by the local balancing authority or local transmission and distribution system operator. (B) The dispatch is intended to mitigate local transmission and/or distribution limitations so as to avert potential voltage collapse or line overloads that could lead to the interruption of power supply in a local area or region.Page 155 of 228

(C) The dispatch follows reliability, emergency operation or similar protocols that follow specific NERC, regional, state, public utility commission or local standards or guidelines. (D) The power is provided only to the facility itself or to support the local transmission and distribution system. (E) The owner or operator identifies and records the entity that dispatches the engine and the specific NERC, regional, state, public utility commission or local standards or guidelines that are being followed for dispatching the engine. The local balancing authority or local transmission and distribution system operator may keep these records on behalf of the engine owner or operator.

* * * * * 25. Section 63.6645 is amended by adding a new paragraph (i) to read as follows:

§63.6645 What notifications must I submit and when?

* * * * * (i) If you own or operate an existing non-emergency CI RICE with a site rating of more than 300 HP located at an area source

of HAP emissions that is certified to the Tier 1 or Tier 2 emission standards in Table 1 of 40 CFR 89.112 and subject to an enforceable state or local standard requiring engine replacement and you intend to meet management practices rather than emission limits, as specified in §63.6603(d), you must submit aPage 156 of 228

notification by March 3, 2013, stating that you intend to use the provision in §63.6603(d) and identifying the state or local regulation that the engine is subject to. 26. Section 63.6650 is amended by adding paragraph (h) to

read as follows: §63.6650 What reports must I submit and when ?

* * * * * (h) If you own or operate an emergency stationary RICE with a site rating of more than 100 brake HP that operates or is contractually obligated to be available for more than 15 hours per calendar year for the purposes specified in §63.6640(f)(2)(ii) and (iii) or that operates for the purpose specified in §63.6640(f)(4)(ii), you must submit an annual report according to the requirements in paragraphs (h)(1) through (3) of this section. (1) The report must contain the following information: (i) Company name and address where the engine is located. (ii) Date of the report and beginning and ending dates of the reporting period. (iii) Engine site rating and model year. (iv) Latitude and longitude of the engine in decimal degrees reported to the fifth decimal place. (v) Hours operated for the purposes specified in §63.6640(f)(2)(ii) and (iii), including the date, start time,Page 157 of 228

and end time for engine operation for the purposes specified in §63.6640(f)(2)(ii) and (iii). (vi) Number of hours the engine is contractually obligated to be available for the purposes specified in §63.6640(f)(2)(ii) and (iii). (vii) Hours spent for operation for the purpose specified in §63.6640(f)(4)(ii), including the date, start time, and end time for engine operation for the purposes specified in §63.6640(f)(4)(ii). The report must also identify the entity that dispatched the engine and the situation that necessitated the dispatch of the engine. (viii) If there were no deviations from the fuel requirements in §63.6604 that apply to the engine (if any), a

statement that there were no deviations from the fuel requirements during the reporting period. (ix) If there were deviations from the fuel requirements in §63.6604 that apply to the engine (if any), information on the number, duration, and cause of deviations, and the corrective

action taken. (2) The first annual report must cover the calendar year 2015 and must be submitted no later than March 31, 2016. Subsequent annual reports for each calendar year must be submitted no later than March 31 of the following calendar year.Page 158 of 228

(3) The annual report must be submitted electronically using the subpart specific reporting form in the Compliance and Emissions Data Reporting Interface (CEDRI) that is accessed through EPA’s Central Data Exchange (CDX) (www.epa.gov/cdx). However, if the reporting form specific to this subpart is not available in CEDRI at the time that the report is due, the written report must be submitted to the Administrator at the appropriate address listed in §63.13. 27. Section 63.6655 is amended by revising the introductory text of paragraph (f) to read as follows: §63.6655 What records must I keep?

* * * * * (f) If you own or operate any of the stationary RICE in paragraphs (f)(1) through (2) of this section, you must keep records of the hours of operation of the engine that is recorded through the non-resettable hour meter. The owner or operator must document how many hours are spent for emergency operation, including what classified the operation as emergency and how many hours are spent for non-emergency operation. If the engine is used for the purposes specified in §63.6640(f)(2)(ii) or (iii) or §63.6640(f)(4)(ii), the owner or operator must keep records of the notification of the emergency situation, and the date, start time, and end time of engine operation for these purposes. * * *Page 159 of 228

* * * * * 28. Section 63.6675 is amended by: a. Adding in alphabetical order the definition of Alaska Railbelt Grid; b. Adding in alphabetical order the definition of Backup power for renewable energy ; c. Revising the definition of Emergency stationary RICE ;

and d. Adding in alphabetical order the definition of Remote stationary RICE to read as follows. §63.6675 What definitions apply to this subpart?

Alaska Railbelt Grid means the service areas of the six regulated public utilities that extend from Fairbanks to Anchorage and the Kenai Peninsula. These utilities are Golden Valley Electric Association; Chugach Electric Association; Matanuska Electric Association; Homer Electric Association; Anchorage Municipal Light & Power; and the City of Seward Electric System.

* * * * * Backup power for renewable energy means an engine that provides backup power to a facility that generates electricity from renewable energy resources, as that term is defined in Alaska Statute 42.45.045(l)(5) (incorporated by reference, see §63.14).Page 160 of 228

* * * * * Emergency stationary RICE means any stationary reciprocating internal combustion engine that meets all of the criteria in paragraphs (1) through (3) of this definition. All emergency stationary RICE must comply with the requirements specified in §63.6640(f) in order to be considered emergency stationary RICE. If the engine does not comply with the requirements specified in §63.6640(f), then it is not considered to be an emergency stationary RICE under this subpart. (1) The stationary RICE is operated to provide electrical power or mechanical work during an emergency situation. Examples include stationary RICE used to produce power for critical networks or equipment (including power supplied to portions of a facility) when electric power from the local utility (or the normal power source, if the facility runs on its own power production) is interrupted, or stationary RICE used to pump water in the case of fire or flood, etc. (2) The stationary RICE is operated under limited circumstances for situations not included in paragraph (1) of this definition, as specified in §63.6640(f). (3) The stationary RICE operates as part of a financial arrangement with another entity in situations not included in paragraph (1) of this definition only as allowed in §63.6640(f)(2)(ii) or (iii) and §63.6640(f)(4)(i) or (ii).Page 161 of 228

* * * * * Remote stationary RICE means stationary RICE meeting any of the following criteria: (1) Stationary RICE located in an offshore area that is beyond the line of ordinary low water along that portion of the

coast of the United States that is in direct contact with the open seas and beyond the line marking the seaward limit of

inland waters. (2) Stationary RICE located on a pipeline segment that meets both of the criteria in paragraphs (2)(i) and (ii) of this

definition. (i) A pipeline segment with 10 or fewer buildings intended for human occupancy and no buildings with four or more stories within 220 yards (200 meters) on either side of the centerline of any continuous 1-mile (1.6 kilometers) length of pipeline. Each separate dwelling unit in a multiple dwelling unit building is counted as a separate building intended for human occupancy. (ii) The pipeline segment does not lie within 100 yards (91 meters) of either a building or a small, well-defined outside area (such as a playground, recreation area, outdoor theater, or other place of public assembly) that is occupied by 20 or more persons on at least 5 days a week for 10 weeks in any 12-month period. The days and weeks need not be consecutive. The buildingPage 162 of 228

or area is considered occupied for a full day if it is occupied for any portion of the day. (iii) For purposes of this paragraph (2), the term pipeline segment means all parts of those physical facilities through which gas moves in transportation, including but not limited to pipe, valves, and other appurtenance attached to pipe, compressor units, metering stations, regulator stations, delivery stations, holders, and fabricated assemblies. Stationary RICE located within 50 yards (46 meters) of the pipeline segment providing power for equipment on a pipeline segment are part of the pipeline segment. Transportation of gas means the gathering, transmission, or distribution of gas by pipeline, or the storage of gas. A building is intended for human occupancy if its primary use is for a purpose involving the presence of humans. (3) Stationary RICE that are not located on gas pipelines and that have 5 or fewer buildings intended for human occupancy and no buildings with four or more stories within a 0.25 mile radius around the engine. A building is intended for human occupancy if its primary use is for a purpose involving the presence of humans.

* * * * * 29. Table 1b to Subpart ZZZZ of Part 63 is revised to read

as follows:Page 163 of 228

**Table 1b to Subpart ZZZZ of Part 63. Operating Limitations for Existing, New, and Reconstructed SI 4SRB Stationary RICE >500 HP**  **Located at a Major Source of HAP Emissions** As stated in §§63.6600, 63.6603, 63.6630 and 63.6640, you must comply with the following operating limitations for existing, new and reconstructed 4SRB stationary RICE >500 HP located at a major source of HAP emissions:

**For each... Y**  **ou must meet the following operating limitation, except**  **during periods of startup...** 1. existing, new and reconstructed 4SRB stationary RICE >500 HP located at a major source of HAP emissions complying with the requirement to reduce formaldehyde emissions by 76 percent or more (or by 75 percent or more, if applicable) and using NSCR;

or existing, new and reconstructed 4SRB stationary RICE >500 HP located at a major source of HAP emissions complying with the requirement to limit the concentration of formaldehyde in the stationary RICE exhaust to 350 ppbvd or less at 15 percent O 2 and using NSCR; a. maintain your catalyst so that the pressure drop across the catalyst does not change by more than 2 inches of water at 100 percent load plus or minus 10 percent from the pressure drop across the catalyst measured during the initial performance test; and b. maintain the temperature of your stationary RICE exhaust so that the catalyst inlet temperature is greater than or equal to 750°F and less than or equal to 1250°F. 1Page 164 of 228

2. existing, new and reconstructed 4SRB stationary RICE >500 HP located at a major source of HAP emissions complying with the requirement to reduce formaldehyde emissions by 76 percent or more (or by 75 percent or more, if applicable) and not using NSCR;

or existing, new and reconstructed 4SRB stationary RICE >500 HP located at a major source of HAP emissions complying with the requirement to limit the concentration of formaldehyde in the stationary RICE exhaust to 350 ppbvd or less at 15 percent O 2 and not using NSCR. Comply with any operating limitations approved by the Administrator.

1 Sources can petition the Administrator pursuant to the requirements of 40 CFR 63.8(f) for a different temperature range. 30. Table 2b to Subpart ZZZZ of Part 63 is revised to read

as follows: **Table 2b to Subpart ZZZZ of Part 63** 

. **Operating Limitations for New and Reconstructed 2SLB and CI Stationary RICE >500 HP**  **Located at a Major Source of HAP Emissions, New and Reconstructed 4SLB Stationary RICE**  **≥ 250 HP Located at a Major**  **Source of HAP Emissions, Existing CI Stationary RICE >500 HP** As stated in §§63.6600, 63.6601, 63.6603, 63.6630, and 63.6640, you must comply with the following operating limitations for new and reconstructed 2SLB and CI stationary RICE >500 HP located at a major source of HAP emissions; new and reconstructed 4SLB stationary RICE ≥ 250 HP located at a major source of HAP emissions; and existing CI stationary RICE >500 HP **:**

**For each... You must meet the following**  **operating limitation, except during periods of startup...**  1. New and reconstructed 2SLB and CI stationary RICE >500 HP located at a major source of a. maintain your catalyst so that the pressure drop across t he catalyst does not change by Formatted TablePage 165 of 228

HAP emissions and new and reconstructed 4SLB stationary RICE ≥ 250 HP located at a major source of HAP emissions complying with the requirement to reduce CO emissions and using an oxidation catalyst;

and

New and reconstructed 2SLB and CI stationary RICE >500 HP located at a major source of HAP emissions and new and reconstructed 4SLB stationary RICE ≥ 250 HP located at a major source of HAP emissions complying with the requirement to limit the concentration of formaldehyde in the stationary RICE exhaust and using an oxidation catalyst more than 2 inches of water at 100 percent load plus or minus 10 percent from the pressure drop across the catalyst that was measured during the initial performance test; and b. maintain the temperature of your stationary RICE exhaust so that the catalyst inlet temperature is greater than or equal to 450°F and less than or equal to 1350°F. 1

2. Existing CI stationary RICE >500 HP complying with the requirement to limit or reduce the concentration of CO in the stationary RICE exhaust and using an oxidation catalyst a. maintain your catalyst so that the pressure drop across the catalyst does not change by more than 2 inches of water from the pressure drop across the catalyst that was measured during the initial performance test; and b. maintain the temperature of your stationary RICE exhaust so that the catalyst inlet temperature is greater than or equal to 450°F and less than or equal to 1350°F. 1Page 166 of 228

3. New and reconstructed 2SLB and CI stationary RICE >500 HP located at a major source of HAP emissions and new and reconstructed 4SLB stationary RICE ≥ 250 HP located at a major source of HAP emissions complying with the requirement to reduce CO emissions and not using an oxidation catalyst;

and

New and reconstructed 2SLB and CI stationary RICE >500 HP located at a major source of HAP emissions and new and reconstructed 4SLB stationary RICE ≥ 250 HP located at a major source of HAP emissions complying with the requirement to limit the concentration of formaldehyde in the stationary RICE exhaust and not using an oxidation catalyst

and existing CI stationary RICE >500 HP complying with the requirement to limit or reduce the concentration of CO in the stationary RICE exhaust and not using an oxidation catalyst Comply with any operating limitations approved by the Administrator.

1 Sources can petition the Administrator pursuant to the requirements of 40 CFR 63.8(f) for a different temperature range. 31. Table 2c to Subpart ZZZZ of Part 63 is revised to read

as follows: **Table 2c to Subpart ZZZZ of Part 63** 

. **Requirements for Existing Compression Ignition Stationary RICE Located at a Major Source**  **of HAP Emissions and Existing Spark Ignition Stationary RICE ≤**  **500 HP Located at a Major Source of HAP Emissions** Formatted TablePage 167 of 228

As stated in §§63.6600, 63.6602, and 63.6640, you must comply with the following requirements for existing compression ignition stationary RICE located at a major source of HAP emissions and existing spark ignition stationary RICE ≤ 500 HP located at a major source of HAP emissions **:**

**F or each...**  **You must meet the following requirement,**  **except during periods of startup...**  **D uring periods of**  **startup you must...**

1. Emergency stationary CI RICE and black start stationary CI RICE. 1 a. Change oil and filter every 500 hours of operation or annually, whichever comes first; 2 b. Inspect air cleaner every 1,000 hours of operation or annually, whichever comes first, and replace as necessary; c. Inspect all hoses and belts every 500 hours of operation or annually, whichever comes first, and replace as necessary. 3 Minimize the engine’s time spent a t idle and minimize t he engine’s startup t ime at startup to a

period needed for a ppropriate and safe loading of the engine, not to exceed 30 minutes, a fter which time the non- s tartup emission

limitations apply. 32. NonEmergency, nonblack start stationary CI RICE <100 HP. a. Change oil and filter every 1,000 hours of operation or annually, whichever comes first 2 ; b. Inspect air cleaner every 1,000 hours of operation or annually, whichever comes first, and replace as necessary; c. Inspect all hoses and belts every 500 hours of operation or annually, whichever comes first, and replace as necessary. 33. NonEmergency, nonblack start CI stationary RICE 100< HP< 300 HP. Limit concentration of CO in the stationary RICE exhaust to 230 ppmvd or less at 15 percent O 2 . Formatted TablePage 168 of 228

4. NonEmergency, nonblack start CI stationary RICE 300<HP< 500. a. Limit concentration of CO in the stationary RICE exhaust to 49 ppmvd or less at 15 percent O 2 ; or b. Reduce CO emissions by 70 percent or more.5. NonEmergency, nonblack start stationary CI RICE >500 HP. a. Limit concentration of CO in the stationary RICE exhaust to 23 ppmvd or less at 15 percent O 2 ; or b. Reduce CO emissions by 70 percent or more. 6. Emergency stationary SI RICE and black start stationary SI RICE. 1 a. Change oil and filter every 500 hours of operation or annually, whichever comes first; 2 b. Inspect spark plugs every 1,000 hours of operation or annually, whichever comes first, and replace as necessary; c. Inspect all hoses and belts every 500 hours of operation or annually, whichever comes first, and replace as necessary. 37. NonEmergency, nonblack start stationary SI RICE <100 HP that are not 2SLB stationary RICE. a. Change oil and filter every 1,440 hours of operation or annually, whichever comes first 2 ; b. Inspect spark plugs every 1,440 hours of operation or annually, whichever comes first, and replace as necessary; c. Inspect all hoses and belts every 1,440 hours of operation or annually, whichever comes first, and replace as necessary. 3Page 169 of 228

8. NonEmergency, nonblack start 2SLB stationary SI RICE <100 HP. a. Change oil and filter every 4,320 hours of operation or annually, whichever comes first 2 ; b. Inspect spark plugs every 4,320 hours of operation or annually, whichever comes first, and replace as necessary; c. Inspect all hoses and belts every 4,320 hours of operation or annually, whichever comes first, and replace as necessary. 39. Nonemergency, nonblack start 2SLB stationary RICE 100 ≤ HP ≤ 500 Limit concentration of CO in the stationary RICE exhaust to 225 ppmvd or less at 15 percent O 210. Nonemergency, nonblack start 4SLB stationary RICE 100 ≤ HP ≤ 500 Limit concentration of CO in the stationary RICE exhaust to 47 ppmvd or less at 15 percent O 211. Nonemergency, nonblack start 4SRB stationary RICE 100 ≤ HP ≤ 500 Limit concentration of formaldehyde in the stationary RICE exhaust to 10.3 ppmvd or less at 15 percent O 212. Nonemergency, nonblack start stationary RICE 100 ≤ HP ≤ 500 which combusts landfill or digester gas equivalent to 10 percent or more of the gross heat input on an annual basis Limit concentration of CO in the stationary RICE exhaust to 177 ppmvd or less at 15 percent O 2

1 If an emergency engine is operating during an emergency and it is not possible to shut down the engine in order to perform the work practice requirements on the schedule required in Table 2c of this subpart, or if performing the work practice on the Formatted TablePage 170 of 228

required schedule would otherwise pose an unacceptable risk under federal, state, or local law, the work practice can be delayed until the emergency is over or the unacceptable risk under federal, state, or local law has abated. The work practice should be performed as soon as practicable after the emergency has ended or the unacceptable risk under federal, state, or local law has abated. Sources must report any failure to perform the work practice on the schedule required and the federal, state or local law under which the risk was deemed unacceptable. 2 Sources have the option to utilize an oil analysis program as described in §63.6625(i) or (j) in order to extend the specified oil change requirement in Table 2c of this subpart. 3 Sources can petition the Administrator pursuant to the requirements of 40 CFR 63.6(g) for alternative work practices. 32. Table 2d to Subpart ZZZZ of Part 63 is revised to read

as follows: **Table 2d to Subpart ZZZZ of Part 63** 

. **Requirements for Existing Stationary RICE Located at Area Sources of HAP Emissions**  As stated in §§63.6603 and 63.6640, you must comply with the following requirements for existing stationary RICE located at area sources of HAP emissions **:**

**For each... You must meet the**  **following requirement, except**  **during periods of startup...**  **During periods of startup you must...** 

1. Non-Emergency, non-black start CI stationary RICE < 300 HP a. Change oil and filter every 1,000 hours of operation or annually, whichever comes first; 1 b. Inspect air cleaner every 1,000 hours of operation or annually, whichever comes first, and replace as necessary; c. Inspect all hoses and belts every 500 hours of Minimize the engine’s time spent at idle and minimize the engine’s startup time at startup to a period needed for appropriate and safe loading of the engine, not to exceed 30 minutes, after which time the non-startup emission limitations apply. Formatted TablePage 171 of 228

operation or annually, whichever comes first, and replace as necessary. 2. Non-Emergency, non-black start CI stationary RICE 300<HP< 500 a. Limit concentration of CO in the stationary RICE exhaust to 49 ppmvd at 15 percent O 2 ; or b. Reduce CO emissions by 70 percent or more. 3. Non-Emergency, non-black start CI stationary RICE >500 HP a. Limit concentration of CO in the stationary RICE exhaust to 23 ppmvd at 15 percent O 2 ; or b. Reduce CO emissions by 70 percent or more. 4. Emergency stationary CI RICE and black start stationary CI RICE 2 a. Change oil and filter every 500 hours of operation or annually, whichever comes first; 1 b. Inspect air cleaner every 1,000 hours of operation or annually, whichever comes first, and replace as necessary; and c. Inspect all hoses and belts every 500 hours of operation or annually, whichever comes first, and replace as necessary.Page 172 of 228

5. Emergency stationary SI RICE; black start stationary SIRICE; nonemergency, nonblack start 4SLB stationary RICE >500 HP that operate 24 hours or less per calendar year; non-emergency, non-black start 4SRB stationary RICE >500 HP that operate 24 hours or less per calendar year 2 a. Change oil and filter every 500 hours of operation or annually, whichever comes first; 1 b. Inspect spark plugs every 1,000 hours of operation or annually, whichever comes first, and replace as necessary; and c. Inspect all hoses and belts every 500 hours of operation or annually, whichever comes first, and replace as necessary. 6. Non-emergency, non-black start 2SLB stationary RICE a. Change oil and filter every 4,320 hours of operation or annually, whichever comes first; 1 b. Inspect spark plugs every 4,320 hours of operation or annually, whichever comes first, and replace as necessary; and c. Inspect all hoses and belts every 4,320 hours of operation or annually, whichever comes first, and replace as necessary.Page 173 of 228

7. Non-emergency, non-black start 4SLB stationary RICE ≤ 500 HP a. Change oil and filter every 1,440 hours of operation or annually, whichever comes first; 1 b. Inspect spark plugs every 1,440 hours of operation or annually, whichever comes first, and replace as necessary; and c. Inspect all hoses and belts every 1,440 hours of operation or annually, whichever comes first, and replace as necessary. 8. Non-emergency, non-black start 4SLB remote stationary RICE >500 HP a. Change oil and filter every 2,160 hours of operation or annually, whichever comes first; 1 b. Inspect spark plugs every 2,160 hours of operation or annually, whichever comes first, and replace as necessary; and c. Inspect all hoses and belts every 2,160 hours of operation or annually, whichever comes first, and replace as necessary.Page 174 of 228

9. Non-emergency, non-black start 4SLB stationary RICE >500 HP that are not remote stationary RICE and that operate more than 24 hours per calendar year Install an oxidation catalyst to reduce HAP emissions from the stationary RICE

10. Non-emergency, non-black start 4SRB stationary RICE ≤ 500 HP a. Change oil and filter every 1,440 hours of operation or annually, whichever comes first; 1 b. Inspect spark plugs every 1,440 hours of operation or annually, whichever comes first, and replace as necessary; and c. Inspect all hoses and belts every 1,440 hours of operation or annually, whichever comes first, and replace as necessary.Page 175 of 228

11. Non-emergency, non-black start 4SRB remote stationary RICE >500 HP a. Change oil and filter every 2,160 hours of operation or annually, whichever comes first; 1 b. Inspect spark plugs every 2,160 hours of operation or annually, whichever comes first, and replace as necessary; and c. Inspect all hoses and belts every 2,160 hours of operation or annually, whichever comes first, and replace as necessary. 12. Non-emergency, non-black start 4SRB stationary RICE >500 HP that are not remote stationary RICE and that operate more than 24 hours per calendar year Install NSCR to reduce HAP emissions from the stationary RICEPage 176 of 228

13. Non-emergency, non-black start stationary RICE which combusts landfill or digester gas equivalent to 10 percent or more of the gross heat input on an annual basis a. Change oil and filter every 1,440 hours of operation or annually, whichever comes first; 1 b. Inspect spark plugs every 1,440 hours of operation or annually, whichever comes first, and replace as necessary; and c. Inspect all hoses and belts every 1,440 hours of operation or annually, whichever comes first, and replace as necessary. 1 Sources have the option to utilize an oil analysis program as described in §63.6625(i) or (j) in order to extend the specified oil change requirement in Table 2d of this subpart. 2 If an emergency engine is operating during an emergency and it is not possible to shut down the engine in order to perform the management practice requirements on the schedule required in Table 2d of this subpart, or if performing the management practice on the required schedule would otherwise pose an unacceptable risk under federal, state, or local law, the management practice can be delayed until the emergency is over or the unacceptable risk under federal, state, or local law has abated. The management practice should be performed as soon as practicable after the emergency has ended or the unacceptable risk under federal, state, or local law has abated. Sources must report any failure to perform the management practice on the schedule required and the federal, state or local law under which the risk was deemed unacceptable. 33. Table 3 to Subpart ZZZZ of Part 63 is revised to read

as follows: **Table 3 to Subpart ZZZZ of Part 63. Subsequent Performance Tests** As stated in §§63.6615 and 63.6620, you must comply with the following subsequent performance test requirements: Formatted TablePage 177 of 228

**For each... Complying with the**  **requirement to... Y**  **ou must...**

1. New or reconstructed 2SLB stationary RICE >500 HP located at major sources; new or reconstructed 4SLB stationary RICE ≥ 250 HP located at major sources; and new or reconstructed CI stationary RICE >500 HP located at major sources. Reduce CO emissions and not using a CEMS Conduct subsequent performance tests semiannually 1

.

2. 4SRB stationary RICE ≥ 5,000 HP located at major sources. Reduce formaldehyde emissions Conduct subsequent performance tests semiannually 1

. 3. Stationary RICE >500 HP located at major sources and new or reconstructed 4SLB stationary RICE 250 ≤ HP ≤ 500 located at major sources. Limit the concentration of formaldehyde in the stationary RICE exhaust Conduct subsequent performance tests semiannually 1

.

4. Existing nonemergency, nonblack start CI stationary RICE >500 HP that are not limited use stationary RICE Limit or reduce CO emissions and not using a CEMS Conduct subsequent performance tests every 8,760 hours or 3 years, whichever comes first.5. Existing nonemergency, nonblack start CI stationary RICE >500 HP that are limited use stationary RICE Limit or reduce CO emissions and not using a CEMS Conduct subsequent performance tests every 8,760 hours or 5 years, whichever comes first.

1 After you have demonstrated compliance for two consecutive tests, you may reduce the frequency of subsequent performance tests to annually. If the results of any subsequent annual performance test indicate the stationary RICE is not inPage 178 of 228

compliance with the CO or formaldehyde emission limitation, or you deviate from any of your operating limitations, you must resume semiannual performance tests. 34. Table 4 to Subpart ZZZZ of Part 63 is revised to read

as follows: **Table 4 to Subpart ZZZZ of Part 63. Requirements for Performance Tests**  As stated in §§63.6610, 63.6611, 63.6612, 63.6620, and 63.6640, you must comply with the following requirements for performance tests for stationary RICE:

**For each...**  **Complying with the**  **requirement to...**  **You must...**  **Using... According to the**  **following requirements** 

**...** 1. 2SLB, 4SLB, and CI stationary RICE a. reduce CO emissions i. Measure the O 2 at the inlet and outlet of the control device; and (1) Method 3 or 3A or 3B of 40 CFR part 60, appendix A, or ASTM Method D6522-00 (Reappro ved 2005) a,c

. (a) Measurements to determine O 2 must be made at the same time as the measurements for COconcentration.

ii. Measure the CO at the inlet and the outlet of the control device (1) ASTM D6522-00 (Reappro ved 2005) a,b,c

or Method 10 of 40 CFR part 60, appendix A. (a) The COconcentration must be at 15 percent O 2 , dry basis.Page 179 of 228

2. 4SRB stationary RICE a. reduce formaldehyd e emissions i. Select the sampling port location and the number of traverse points; and (1) Method 1 or 1A of 40 CFR part 60, appendix A §63.7(d) (1)(i) (a) sampling sites must be located at the inlet and outlet of the control device.

ii. Measure O 2 at the inlet and outlet of the control device; and (1) Method 3 or 3A or 3B of 40 CFR part 60, appendix A, or ASTM Method D6522- 00(Reapp roved 2005) a

. (a) measurements to determine O 2 concentratio n must be made at the same time as the measurements for formaldehyde or THC concentratio n. iii. Measure moisture content at the inlet and outlet of the control device; and (1) Method 4 of 40 CFR part 60, appendix A, or Test Method 320 of 40 CFR part 63, appendix A, or ASTM D 6348-03 a (a) measurements to determine moisture content must be made at the same time and location as the measurements for formaldehyde or THC concentratio n.Page 180 of 228

iv. If demonstra ting complianc e with the formaldeh yde percent reduction requireme nt, measureformaldehyde at the inlet and the outlet of the control device (1) Method 320 or 323 of 40 CFR part 63, appendix A; or ASTM D6348- 03 a , provided in ASTM D6348-03 Annex A5 (Analyte Spiking Techniqu e), the percent R must be greater than or equal to 70 and less than or equal to 130. (a) formaldehydeconcentration must be at 15 percent O 2 , dry basis. Results of this test consist of the average of the three 1-hour or longer runs.Page 181 of 228

v. If demonstra ting complianc e with the THC percent reduction requireme nt, measure THC at the inlet and the outlet of the control device (1) Method 25A, reported as propane, of 40 CFR part 60, appendix A (a) THCconcentration must be at 15 percent O 2 , dry basis. Results of this test consist of the average of the three 1-hour or longer runs.

3. Stationary RICE a. limit theconcentration offormaldehyde or CO in the stationary RICE exhaust i. Select the sampling port location and the number of traverse points; and (1) Method 1 or 1A of 40 CFR part 60, appendix A §63.7(d) (1)(i) (a) if using a control device, the sampling site must be located at the outlet of the control device. ii. Determine the O 2 concentra tion of the stationar y RICE exhaust at the sampling port location; and (1) Method 3 or 3A or 3B of 40 CFR part 60, appendix A, or ASTM Method D6522- 00(Reapp roved 2005) a

. (a) measurements to determine O 2 concentration must be made at the same time and location as the measurements for formaldehyde or COconcentration. iii. Measure moisture (1) Method 4 of 40 (a) measurements to determine Deleted: non-methanePage 182 of 228

content of thestationary RICE exhaust at the sampling port location; and CFR part 60, appendix A, or Test Method 320 of 40 CFR part 63, appendix A, or ASTM D 6348-03 a moisture content must be made at the same time and location as the measurements for formaldehyde or CO concentratio n. iv. Measureformaldehyde at the exhaust of thestationary RICE; or (1) Method 320 or 323 of 40 CFR part 63, appendix A; or ASTM D6348-03

a , provided in ASTM D6348-03 Annex A5 (Analyte Spiking Techniqu e), the percent R must be greater than or equal to 70 and less than or equal to 130. (a) Formaldehyde concentratio n must be at 15 percent O 2 , dry basis. Results of this test consist of the average of the three 1-hour or longer runs.

v. measure CO at the exhaust (1) Method 10 of 40 CFR part (a) CO concentratio n must be at 15 percentPage 183 of 228

of thestationary RICE. 60, appendix A, ASTM Method D6522-00 (2005) a,c , Method 320 of 40 CFR part 63, appendix A, or ASTM D6348-03

a

. O 2 , dry basis. Results of this test consist of the average of the three 1-hour or longer runs.

a Incorporated by reference, see 40 CFR 63.14. You may also obtain copies from University Microfilms International, 300 North Zeeb Road, Ann Arbor, MI 48106.. b You may also use Method 320 of 40 CFR part 63, appendix A, or ASTM D6348-03.

c ASTM-D6522-00 (2005) may be used to test both CI and SI stationary RICE. 35. Table 5 to Subpart ZZZZ of Part 63 is revised to read

as follows: **Table 5 to Subpart ZZZZ of Part 63. Initial Compliance with Emission Limitations, Operating Limitations,**  **and Other Requirements**  As stated in §§63.6612, 63.6625 and 63.6630, you must initially comply with the emission and operating limitations as required by the following:

**For each . . . Complying with the**  **requirement to . . .**  **You have demonstrated**  **initial compliance if . . .**  Deleted: **Work Practices, and Management Practices** Page 184 of 228

1. New orreconstructed nonemergency 2SLB stationary RICE >500 HP located at a major source of HAP, new orreconstructed nonemergency 4SLB stationary RICE ≥ 250 HP located at a major source of HAP, non-emergency stationary CI RICE >500 HP located at a major source of HAP, and existing non-emergency stationary CI RICE >500 HP located at an area source of HAP. a. Reduce CO emissions and using oxidation catalyst, and using a CPMS i. The average reduction of emissions of CO determined from the initial performance test achieves the required CO percent reduction; and

ii. You have installed a CPMS to continuously monitor catalyst inlet temperature according to the requirements in §63.6625(b); and

iii. You have recorded the catalyst pressure drop and catalyst inlet temperature during the initial performance test.Page 185 of 228

2. Non-emergency stationary CI RICE >500 HP located at a major source of HAP, and existing non-emergency stationary CI RICE >500 HP located at an area source of HAP. a. Limit the concentration of CO, using oxidation catalyst, and using a CPMS i. The average CO concentration determined from the initial performance test is less than or equal to the CO emission limitation; and

ii. You have installed a CPMS to continuously monitor catalyst inlet temperature according to the requirements in §63.6625(b); and

iii. You have recorded the catalyst pressure drop and catalyst inlet temperature during the initial p erformance test. 3. New orreconstructed nonemergency 2SLB stationary RICE >500 HP located at a major source of HAP, new orreconstructed nonemergency 4SLB stationary RICE ≥ 250 HP located at a major source of HAP, non-emergency stationary CI RICE >500 HP located at a major source of HAP, and existing non-emergency stationary CI RICE >500 HP located at an area source of HAP. a. Reduce CO emissions and not using oxidation catalyst i. The average reduction of emissions of CO determined from the initial performance test achieves the required CO percent reduction; and

ii. You have installed a CPMS to continuously monitor operating parameters approved by the Administrator (if any) according to the requirements in §63.6625(b); and

iii. You have recorded thePage 186 of 228

approved operating parameters (if any) during the initial performance test. 4. Non-emergency stationary CI RICE >500 HP located at a major source of HAP, and existing non-emergency stationary CI RICE >500 HP located at an area source of HAP. a. Limit the concentration of CO, and not using oxidation catalyst i. The average CO concentration determined from the initial performance test is less than or equal to the CO emission limitation; and

ii. You have installed a CPMS to continuously monitor operating parameters approved by the Administrator (if any) according to the requirements in §63.6625(b); and

iii. You have recorded the approved operating parameters (if any) during the initial performance test.Page 187 of 228

5. New orreconstructed nonemergency 2SLB stationary RICE >500 HP located at a major source of HAP, new orreconstructed nonemergency 4SLB stationary RICE ≥ 250 HP located at a major source of HAP, non-emergency stationary CI RICE >500 HP located at a major source of HAP, and existing non-emergency stationary CI RICE >500 HP located at an area source of HAP. a. Reduce CO emissions, and using a CEMS i. You have installed a CEMS to continuously monitor CO and either O 2 or CO 2 at both the inlet and outlet of the oxidation catalyst according to the requirements in §63.6625(a); and

ii. You have conducted a performance evaluation of your CEMS using PS 3 and 4A of 40 CFR part 60, appendix B; and iii. The average reduction of CO calculated using §63.6620 equals or exceeds the required percent reduction. The initial test comprises the first 4-hour period after successful validation of the CEMS. Compliance is based on the average percent reduction achieved during the 4-hour period.Page 188 of 228

6. Non-emergency stationary CI RICE >500 HP located at a major source of HAP, and existing non-emergency stationary CI RICE >500 HP located at an area source of HAP. a. Limit the concentration of CO, and using a CEMS i. You have installed a CEMS to continuously monitor CO and either O 2 or CO 2 at the outlet of the oxidation catalyst according to the requirements in §63.6625(a); and

ii. You have conducted a performance evaluation of your CEMS using PS 3 and 4A of 40 CFR part 60, appendix B; and iii. The average concentration of CO calculated using §63.6620 is less than or equal to the CO emission limitation. The initial test comprises the first 4-hour period after successful validation of the CEMS. Compliance is based on the average concentration measured during the 4-hour period. 7. Non-emergency 4SRB stationary RICE >500 HP located at a major source of HAP. a. Reduce formaldehyde emissions and u sing NSCR i. The average reduction of emissions of formaldehyde determined from the initial performance test is equal to or greater than the required formaldehydePage 189 of 228

percent reduction, or the average reduction of emissions of THC determined from the initial performance test is equal to or greater than 30 percent; and

ii. You have installed a CPMS to continuously monitor catalyst inlet temperature according to the requirements in §63.6625(b); and

iii. You have recorded the catalyst pressure drop and catalyst inlet temperature during the initial performance test. 8. Non-emergency 4SRB stationary RICE >500 HP located at a major source of HAP. a. Reduce formaldehyde emissions and not using NSCR i. The average reduction of emissions of formaldehyde determined from the initial performance test is equal to or greater than the required formaldehyde percent reduction or the average reduction of emissions of THC determined from the initial performance test is equal to or greater than 30 percent; and

ii. You havePage 190 of 228

installed a CPMS to continuously monitor operating parameters approved by the Administrator (if any) according to the requirements in §63.6625(b); and

iii. You have recorded the approved operating parameters (if any) during the initial performance test. 9. New orreconstructed nonemergency stationary RICE >500 HP located at a major source of HAP, new orreconstructed nonemergency 4SLB stationary RICE 250 ≤ HP ≤ 500 located at a major source of HAP, andexisting nonemergency 4SRB stationary RICE >500 HP located at a major source of HAP. a. Limit the concentration of formaldehyde i n the stationary RICE exhaust and using oxidation catalyst or NSCR i. The average formaldehyde concentration, corrected to 15 percent O 2 , dry basis, from the three test runs is less than or equal to the formaldehyde emission limitation; and

ii. You have installed a CPMS to continuously monitor catalyst inlet temperature according to the requirements in §63.6625(b); and

iii. You have recorded the catalyst pressure drop and catalyst inlet temperature during the initial performance test. 10. New orreconstructed nonemergency a. Limit the concentration of formaldehyde in the i. The average formaldehyde c oncentration,Page 191 of 228

stationary RICE >500 HP located at a major source of HAP, new orreconstructed nonemergency 4SLB stationary RICE 250 ≤ HP ≤ 500 located at a major source of HAP, andexisting nonemergency 4SRB stationary RICE >500 HP located at a major source of HAP. stationary RICE exhaust and not using oxidation catalyst or NSCR corrected to 15 percent O 2 , dry basis, from the three test runs is less than or equal to the formaldehyde emission limitation; and

ii. You have installed a CPMS to continuously monitor operating parameters approved by the Administrator (if any) according to the requirements in §63.6625(b); and

iii. You have recorded the approved operating parameters (if any) during the initial performance test.11. Existing nonemergency stationary RICE 100 ≤ HP ≤ 500 located at a major source of HAP, andexisting nonemergency stationary CI RICE 300<HP ≤ 500 located at an area source of HAP. a. Reduce CO emissions. i. The average reduction of emissions of CO or formaldehyde, as applicable determined from the initial performance test is equal to or greater than the required CO or formaldehyde, as applicable, percent reduction.12. Existing nonemergency stationary RICE 100 ≤ HP ≤ 500 located at a major source of HAP, andexisting nonemergency a. Limit the concentration of formaldehyde or CO in the stationary RICE exhaust. i. The average formaldehyde or CO concentration, as applicable, corrected to 15 percent O 2 , dry basis, from the three test runs isPage 192 of 228

stationary CI RICE 300<HP ≤ 500 located at an area source of HAP. less than or equal to the formaldehyde or CO emission limitation, as applicable.13. Existing nonemergency 4SLB stationary RICE >500 HP located at an area source of HAP that are not remote stationary RICE and that are operated more than 24 hours per calendar year a. Install an oxidation catalyst i. You have conducted an initial compliance demonstration as specified in §63.6630(e) to show that the average reduction of emissions of CO is 93 percent or more, or the average CO concentration is less than or equal to 47 ppmvd at 15 percent O 2 ii. You have installed a CPMS to continuously monitor catalyst inlet temperature according to the requirements in §63.6625(b), or you have installed equipment to automatically shut down the engine if the catalyst inlet temperature exceeds 1350°F.14. Existing nonemergency 4SRB stationary RICE >500 HP located at an area source of HAP that are not remote stationary RICE and that are operated more than 24 hours per calendar year a. Install NSCR i. You have conducted an initial compliance demonstration as specified in §63.6630(e) to show that the average reduction of emissions of CO is 75 percent or more, the average COPage 193 of 228

concentration is less than or equal to 270 ppmvd at 15 percent O 2 , or the average reduction of emissions of THC is 30 percent or more ii. You have installed a CPMS to continuously monitor catalyst inlet temperature according to the requirements in §63.6625(b), or you have installed equipment to automatically shut down the engine if the catalyst inlet temperature exceeds 1250°F.

36. Table 6 to Subpart ZZZZ of Part 63 is revised to read

as follows: **Table 6 to Subpart ZZZZ of Part 63. Continuous Compliance with Emission Limitations, and**  **Other Requirements** As stated in §63.6640, you must continuously comply with the emissions and operating limitations and work or management practices as required by the following:

**For each . . . Complying with the**  **requirement to . .**

**. You must**  **demonstrate continuous**  **compliance by**

**. . .** 1. New orreconstructed nonemergency 2SLB stationary RICE a. Reduce CO emissions and using an oxidation catalyst, and using i. Conducting semiannual performance tests for CO to Deleted: **Operating Limitations, Work Practices,**  Deleted: **Management Practices**Page 194 of 228

>500 HP located at a major source of HAP, new orreconstructed nonemergency 4SLB stationary RICE ≥ 250 HP located at a major source of HAP, and new orreconstructed nonemergency CI stationary RICE >500 HP located at a major source of HAP. a CPMS demonstrate that the required CO percent reduction is achieved a ; and ii. Collecting the catalyst inlet temperature data according to §63.6625(b); and

i ii. Reducing these data to 4-hour rolling averages; and

i v. Maintaining the 4-hour rolling a verages within the operating l imitations for the catalyst inlet temperature; and v. Measuring the pressure drop a cross the catalyst once per month and demonstrating that the pressure drop a cross the catalyst is within the operating limitation established during the performance test. 2. New orreconstructed nonemergency 2SLB stationary RICE >500 HP located at a major source of HAP, new orreconstructed nonemergency 4SLB stationary RICE a. Reduce CO emissions and not using an oxidation catalyst, and using a CPMS i. Conducting semiannual performance tests for CO to demonstrate that the required CO percent reduction is achieved a ; and ii. Collecting thePage 195 of 228

≥ 250 HP located at a major source of HAP, and new orreconstructed nonemergency CI stationary RICE >500 HP located at a major source of HAP. approved operating parameter (if any) data according to §63.6625(b); and

i ii. Reducing these data to 4-hour rolling averages; and

i v. Maintaining the 4-hour rolling averages within t he operating l imitations for the operating parameters established during the performance test. 3. New orreconstructed nonemergency 2SLB stationary RICE >500 HP located at a major source of HAP, new orreconstructed nonemergency 4SLB stationary RICE ≥ 250 HP located at a major source of HAP, new orreconstructed nonemergency stationary CI RICE >500 HP located at a major source of HAP, and existing non-emergency stationary CI RICE >500 HP. a. Reduce CO emissions or limit the concentration of CO in the stationary RICE exhaust, and using a CEMS i. Collecting the monitoring data according to §63.6625(a), reducing the measurements to 1- hour averages, calculating the percent reduction o r concentration of CO emissions according to §63.6620; and ii. Demonstrating that the catalyst achieves the required percent reduction of CO emissions over the 4-hour averaging p eriod, or that the emission remain at or below the CO concentration limit; andPage 196 of 228

iii. Conducting an a nnual RATA of your C EMS using PS 3 and 4A of 40 CFR part 60, appendix B, as well as daily and periodic data quality checks in accordance with 40 CFR part 60, appendix F, procedure 1. 4. Non-emergency 4SRB stationary RICE >500 HP located at a major source of HAP. a. Reduce formaldehyde emissions and using NSCR i. Collecting the catalyst inlet temperature data according to §63.6625(b); and ii. reducing these data to 4-hour rolling averages; and iii. Maintaining the 4-hour rolling a verages within the operating l imitations for the catalyst inlet temperature; and iv. Measuring the pressure drop a cross the catalyst once per month and demonstrating that the pressure drop a cross the catalyst is within the operating limitation established during the performance test. 5. Non-emergency 4SRB stationary RICE >500 HP a. Reduce formaldehyde emissions and not i. Collecting the approved operating p arameter (if any)Page 197 of 228

located at a major source of HAP. using NSCR data according to §63.6625(b); and ii. Reducing these data to 4-hour rolling averages; and iii. Maintaining the 4-hour rolling a verages within the operating l imitations for the operating parameters established during the performance test. 6. Non-emergency 4SRB stationary RICE with a brake HP ≥ 5,000 located at a major source of HAP. a. Reduce formaldehyde emissions Conducting semiannual performance tests f or formaldehyde to demonstrate that the required formaldehyde percent reduction is achieved, or to demonstrate that the average reduction of emissions of THC d etermined from the p erformance test is e q ual to or greater than 30 percent. a 7. New orreconstructed nonemergency stationary RICE >500 HP located at a major source of HAP and new orreconstructed nonemergency 4SLB stationary RICE 250 ≤ HP ≤ 500 located at a major source a. Limit the concentration of formaldehyde i n the stationary RICE exhaust and using oxidation catalyst or NSCR i. Conducting semiannual performance tests f or formaldehyde to demonstrate that your emissions remain at or below the formaldehyde concentration limit a ; and

i i. C ollecting thePage 198 of 228

of HAP. catalyst inlet temperature data according to §63.6625(b); and

i ii. Reducing these data to 4-hour rolling averages; and

i v. Maintaining the 4-hour rolling a verages within the operating l imitations for the catalyst inlet temperature; and v. Measuring the pressure drop a cross the catalyst once per month and demonstrating that the pressure drop a cross the catalyst is within the operating limitation established during the performance test. 8. New orreconstructed nonemergency stationary RICE >500 HP located at a major source of HAP and new orreconstructed nonemergency 4SLB stationary RICE 250 ≤ HP ≤ 500 located at a major source of HAP. a. Limit the concentration of formaldehyde in the stationary RICE exhaust and not using oxidation catalyst or NSCR i. Conducting semiannual performance tests f or formaldehyde to demonstrate that your emissions remain at or below the formaldehyde concentration limit a ; and ii. Collecting the approved operating parameter (if any) data according to §63.6625(b); andPage 199 of 228

i ii. Reducing these data to 4-hour rolling averages; and

i v. Maintaining the 4-hour rolling a verages within the operating l imitations for the operating parameters established during the performance test. 9. Existing emergency and black start stationary RICE ≤ 500 HP located at a major source ofHAP, existing nonemergency stationary RICE <100 HP located at a major source of HAP, existing emergency and black start stationary RICE located at an area source of HAP,existing nonemergency stationary CI RICE ≤ 300 HP located at an area source ofHAP, existing nonemergency 2SLB stationary RICE located at an area source of HAP,existing nonemergency stationary SI RICE located at an area a. Work or Management practices. i. Operating and maintaining the stationary RICE according to the manufacturer’s emission-related operation and maintenance instructions; or ii. Develop and follow your own maintenance plan which must provide to the extent p racticable for the maintenance and operation of the engine in a manner consistent with good air pollution control practice for minimizing emissions.Page 200 of 228

source of HAP which combusts landfill or digester gas equivalent to 10 percent or more of the gross heat input on an annual basis, existing non-emergency 4SLB and 4SRB stationary RICE ≤ 500 HP located at an area source ofHAP, existing nonemergency 4SLB and 4SRB stationary RICE >500 HP located at an area source of HAP that operate 24 hours or less per calendar year, andexisting nonemergency 4SLB and 4SRB stationary RICE >500 HP located at an area source of HAP that are remote stationary RICE. 10. Existing stationary CI RICE >500 HP that are not limited use stationary RICE. a. Reduce CO emissions, or l i mit the concentration of CO in the stationary RICE exhaust, and using oxidation catalyst i. Conducting performance tests every 8,760 hours or 3 years, whichever comes first, for CO or formaldehyde, as appropriate, to demonstrate that the required CO or formaldehyde, as appropriate, percent reduction is achieved or t hat your emissions remain at or belowPage 201 of 228

the CO or formaldehyde concentration limit; and ii. Collecting the catalyst inlet temperature data according to §63.6625(b); and

i ii. Reducing these data to 4-hour rolling averages; and

iv. M aintaining the 4-hour rolling a verages within the operating l imitations for the catalyst inlet temperature; and v. Measuring the pressure drop a cross the catalyst once per month and demonstrating that the pressure drop a cross the catalyst is within the operating limitation established during the performance test. 11. Existing stationary CI RICE >500 HP that are not limited use stationary RICE. a. Reduce CO emissions, or l i mit the concentration of CO in the stationary RICE exhaust, and not using oxidation catalyst i. Conducting performance tests every 8,760 hours or 3 years, whichever comes first, for CO or formaldehyde, as appropriate, to demonstrate that the required CO orPage 202 of 228

formaldehyde, as appropriate, percent reduction is achieved or t hat your emissions remain at or below the CO or formaldehyde concentration limit; and ii. Collecting the approved operating parameter (if any) data according to §63.6625(b); and

i ii. Reducing these data to 4-hour rolling averages; and

i v. Maintaining the 4-hour rolling a verages within the operating l imitations for the operating parameters established during the performance test. 12. Existing limited use CI stationary RICE >500 HP. a. Reduce CO emissions or limit the concentration of CO in the stationary RICE exhaust, and using an oxidation catalyst i. Conducting performance tests every 8,760 hours or 5 years, whichever comes first, for CO or formaldehyde, as appropriate, to demonstrate that the required CO or formaldehyde, as appropriate, percent reduction is achieved or t hat your emissionsPage 203 of 228

remain at or below the CO or formaldehyde concentration limit; and ii. Collecting the catalyst inlet temperature data according to §63.6625(b); and

i ii. Reducing these data to 4-hour rolling averages; and

i v. Maintaining the 4-hour rolling a verages within the operating l imitations for the catalyst inlet temperature; and v. Measuring the pressure drop a cross the catalyst once per month and demonstrating that the pressure drop a cross the catalyst is within the operating limitation established during the performance test. 13. Existing limited use CI stationary RICE >500 HP. a. Reduce CO emissions or limit the concentration of CO in the stationary RICE exhaust, and not using an oxidation catalyst i. Conducting performance tests every 8,760 hours or 5 years, whichever comes first, for CO or formaldehyde, as appropriate, to demonstrate thatPage 204 of 228

the required CO or formaldehyde, as appropriate, percent reduction is achieved or t hat your emissions remain at or below the CO or formaldehyde concentration limit; and ii. Collecting the approved operating parameter (if any) data according to §63.6625(b); and

i ii. Reducing these data to 4-hour rolling averages; and

i v. Maintaining the 4-hour rolling a verages within the operating l imitations for the operating parameters established during the performance test.14. Existing nonemergency 4SLB stationary RICE >500 HP located at an area source of HAP that are not remote stationary RICE and that are operated more than 24 hours per calendar year a. Install an oxidation catalyst i. Conducting annual compliance demonstrations as specified in §63. 6 640(c) to show that the average reduction of emissions of CO is 9 3 percent or more, or the average CO concentration is less than or equal to 47 ppmvd at 15 percent O 2 ; andPage 205 of 228

either ii. Collecting the catalyst inlet temperature data according to §63.6625(b), r educing these data to 4-hour rolling averages; and maintaining the 4- hour rolling a verages within the limitation of greater than 450°F and less than or equal to 1350°F f or the catalyst inlet temperature; or iii. Immediately shutting down the engine if the catalyst inlet t emperature exceeds 1350° F.15. Existing nonemergency 4SRB stationary RICE >500 HP located at an area source of HAP that are not remote stationary RICE and that are operated more than 24 hours per calendar year a. Install NSCR i. Conducting annual compliance demonstrations as specified in §63.6640(c ) to show that the average reduction of emissions of CO is 75 percent or more, the average CO concentration is less than or equal to 270 ppmvd at 15 percent O 2, or the average reduction o f emissions of THC is 30 percent or more; and either ii. Collecting the catalyst inlet temperature data according to §63.6625(b),Page 206 of 228

r educing these data to 4-hour rolling averages; and maintaining the 4- hour rolling a verages within the limitation of greater than or equal to 750°F and less than or equal to 1250°F for the catalyst inlet temperature; or iii. Immediately shutting down the engine if the catalyst inlet t emperature exceeds 1250° F.

a After you have demonstrated compliance for two consecutive tests, you may reduce the frequency of subsequent performance tests to annually. If the results of any subsequent annual performance test indicate the stationary RICE is not in compliance with the CO or formaldehyde emission limitation, or you deviate from any of your operating limitations, you must resume semiannual performance tests. 37. Table 7 to Subpart ZZZZ of Part 63 is revised to read

as follows: **Table 7 to Subpart ZZZZ of Part 63. Requirements for Reports** As stated in §63.6650, you must comply with the following requirements for reports:

**For each . . . You must submit a .** 

**. . The report must**  **contain . . . You must submit**  **the report . .**

**.**1. Existing nonemergency, nonblack start stationary RICE 100 ≤ HP ≤ 500 located at a major source of HAP; existing Compliance report a. If there are no deviations from any emission limitations or operating limitations i. Semiannually according to the requirements in §63.6650(b)(1)- (5) for engines that are notPage 207 of 228

non-emergency, non-black start stationary CI RICE >500 HP located at a major source ofHAP; existing nonemergency 4SRB stationary RICE >500 HP located at a major source ofHAP; existing nonemergency, nonblack start stationary CI RICE >300 HP located at an area source of HAP; new orreconstructed nonemergency stationary RICE >500 HP located at a major source of HAP; and new orreconstructed nonemergency 4SLB stationary RICE 250 ≤ HP ≤ 500 located at a major source of HAP that apply to you, a statement that there were no deviations from the emission limitations or operating limitations during the reporting period. If there were no periods during which the CMS, including CEMS and CPMS, was out-of-control, as specified in §63.8(c)(7), a statement that there were not periods during which the CMSwas out-ofcontrol during the reporting period; or limited use stationary RICE subject to numerical emission limitations; and ii. Annually according to the requirements in §63.6650(b)(6)- (9) for engines that are limited use stationary RICE subject to numerical emission limitations.

b. If you had a deviation from any emission limitation or operating limitation during the reporting period, the information in §63.6650(d). If there were periods during which the CMS, including CEMS and CPMS, was out-of-control, as specified in §63.8(c)(7), i. Semiannually according to the requirements in §63.6650(b).Page 208 of 228

the information in §63.6650(e); or c. If you had a malfunction during the reporting period, the information in §63.6650(c)(4). i. Semiannually according to the requirements in §63.6650(b).

2. New orreconstructed nonemergency stationary RICE that combusts landfill gas or digester gas equivalent to 10 percent or more of the gross heat input on an annual basis Report a. The fuel flow rate of each fuel and the heating values that were used in your calculations, and you must demonstrate that the percentage of heat input provided by landfill gas or digester gas, is equivalent to 10 percent or more of the gross heat input on an annual basis; and i. Annually, according to the requirements in §63.6650.

b. The operating limits provided in your federally enforceable permit, and any deviations from these limits; and i. See item 2.a.i.

c. Any problems or errors suspected with i. See item 2.a.i.Page 209 of 228

the meters.3. Existing nonemergency, nonblack start 4SLB and 4SRB stationary RICE >500 HP located at an area source of HAP that are not remote stationary RICE and that operate more than 24 hours per calendar year Compliance report a. The results of the annual compliance demonstration, if conducted during the reporting period. i. Semiannually according to the requirements in §63.6650(b)(1)- (5)

4. Emergency stationary RICE that operate or are contractually obligated to be available for more than 15 hours per year for the purposes specified in §63.6640(f)(2)(ii) and (iii) or that operate for the purposes specified in §63.6640(f)(4)( ii) Report a. The information in §63.6650(h)(1) i. annually according to the requirements in §63.6650(h)(2)- (3)

38. Table 8 to Subpart ZZZZ of Part 63 is amended by: a. Revising the entry for §63.8(c)(1)(i); b. Revising the entry for §63.8(c)(1)(iii); and c. Revising the entry for §63.10(b)(1) to read as follows: **Table 8 to Subpart ZZZZ of Part 63. Applicability of General Provisions to Subpart ZZZZ.**  As stated in §63.6665, you must comply with the following applicable general provisions.

**General Subject of Citation Applie Explanation** Page 210 of 228

**Provisions Citation**  **s to Subpar**  **t** * * * * * * * §63.8(c)(1) (i) Routine and predictable SSM No

* * * * * * * §63.8(c)(1) (iii) Compliance with operation and maintenance requirements No

* * * * * * * §63.10(b)(1) Record retention Yes Except that the most recent 2 years of data do not have to be retained on site. * * * * * * *

39. Appendix A to Subpart ZZZZ of Part 63 is added to read

as follows: **Appendix A Protocol for Using an Electrochemical Analyzer to Determine**  **Oxygen and Carbon Monoxide Concentrations from Certain Engines**

1.0 Scope and Application. What is this Protocol? This protocol is a procedure for using portable electrochemical (EC) cells for measuring carbon monoxide (CO) and oxygen (O 2 )

concentrations in controlled and uncontrolled emissions from existing stationary 4-stroke lean burn and 4-stroke rich burn reciprocating internal combustion engines as specified in the applicable rule. 1.1 Analytes. What does this protocol determine?Page 211 of 228

This protocol measures the engine exhaust gas concentrations of carbon monoxide (CO) and oxygen (O 2 ). **Analyte CAS No.**  **S ensitivity**  Carbon monoxide (CO) 630-08-0 Minimum detectable limit should be 2

percent of the nominal range or 1 ppm, whichever is less restrictive. Oxygen (O 2 ) 7782-44-7

1.2 Applicability. When is this protocol acceptable? This protocol is applicable to 40 CFR part 63, subpart ZZZZ. Because of inherent cross sensitivities of EC cells, you must not apply this protocol to other emissions sources without specific instruction to that effect. 1.3 Data Quality Objectives. How good must my collected data be? Refer to Section 13 to verify and document acceptable analyzer performance. 1.4 Range. What is the targeted analytical range for this protocol? The measurement system and EC cell design(s) conforming to this protocol will determine the analytical range for each gas component. The nominal ranges are defined by choosing up-scale calibration gas concentrations near the maximum anticipated flue gas concentrations for CO and O 2 , or no more than twice the permitted CO level. Formatted TablePage 212 of 228

1.5 Sensitivity. What minimum detectable limit will this protocol yield for a particular gas component? The minimum detectable limit depends on the nominal range and resolution of the specific EC cell used, and the signal to noise ratio of the measurement system. The minimum detectable limit should be 2 percent of the nominal range or 1 ppm, whichever is

less restrictive. 2.0 Summary of Protocol In this protocol, a gas sample is extracted from an engine exhaust system and then conveyed to a portable EC analyzer for

measurement of CO and O 2 gas concentrations. This method provides measurement system performance specifications and sampling protocols to ensure reliable data. You may use additions to, or modifications of vendor supplied measurement systems (e.g., heated or unheated sample lines, thermocouples, flow meters, selective gas scrubbers, etc.) to meet the design specifications of this protocol. Do not make changes to the measurement system from the as-verified configuration (Section 3.12).

3.0 Definitions 3.1 Measurement System . The total equipment required for the

measurement of CO and O 2 concentrations. The measurement system consists of the following major subsystems:

3.1.1 Data Recorder . A strip chart recorder, computer or digital recorder for logging measurement data from the analyzer output.Page 213 of 228

You may record measurement data from the digital data display manually or electronically. 3.1.2 Electrochemical (EC) Cell . A device, similar to a fuel cell, used to sense the presence of a specific analyte and generate an electrical current output proportional to the analyte concentration.

3.1.3 Interference Gas Scrubber . A device used to remove or neutralize chemical compounds that may interfere with the selective operation of an EC cell. 3.1.4 Moisture Removal System . Any device used to reduce the concentration of moisture in the sample stream so as to protect the EC cells from the damaging effects of condensation and to minimize errors in measurements caused by the scrubbing of soluble gases. 3.1.5 Sample Interface . The portion of the system used for one or more of the following: sample acquisition; sample transport; sample conditioning or protection of the EC cell from any degrading effects of the engine exhaust effluent; removal of particulate matter and condensed moisture. 3.2 Nominal Range . The range of analyte concentrations over which each EC cell is operated (normally 25 percent to 150 percent of up-scale calibration gas value). Several nominal ranges can be used for any given cell so long as the calibrationPage 214 of 228

and repeatability checks for that range remain within specifications.

3.3 Calibration Gas . A vendor certified concentration of a specific analyte in an appropriate balance gas.

3.4 Zero Calibration Error . The analyte concentration output exhibited by the EC cell in response to zero-level calibration

gas. 3.5 Up-Scale Calibration Error . The mean of the difference between the analyte concentration exhibited by the EC cell and the certified concentration of the up-scale calibration gas.

3.6 Interference Check . A procedure for quantifying analytical interference from components in the engine exhaust gas other than the targeted analytes. 3.7 Repeatability Check . A protocol for demonstrating that an EC cell operated over a given nominal analyte concentration range provides a stable and consistent response and is not significantly affected by repeated exposure to that gas. 3.8 Sample Flow Rate . The flow rate of the gas sample as it passes through the EC cell. In some situations, EC cells can experience drift with changes in flow rate. The flow rate must be monitored and documented during all phases of a sampling run. 3.9 Sampling Run . A timed three-phase event whereby an EC cell’s response rises and plateaus in a sample conditioning phase, remains relatively constant during a measurement data phase,Page 215 of 228

then declines during a refresh phase. The sample conditioning phase exposes the EC cell to the gas sample for a length of time sufficient to reach a constant response. The measurement data phase is the time interval during which gas sample measurements can be made that meet the acceptance criteria of this protocol. The refresh phase then purges the EC cells with CO-free air. The refresh phase replenishes requisite O 2 and moisture in the electrolyte reserve and provides a mechanism to de-gas or desorb any interference gas scrubbers or filters so as to enable a stable CO EC cell response. There are four primary types of sampling runs: pre- sampling calibrations; stack gas sampling; post-sampling calibration checks; and measurement system repeatability checks. Stack gas sampling runs can be chained together for extended evaluations, providing all other procedural specifications are met. 3.10 Sampling Day . A time not to exceed twelve hours from the time of the pre-sampling calibration to the post-sampling calibration check. During this time, stack gas sampling runs can be repeated without repeated recalibrations, providing all other sampling specifications have been met. 3.11 Pre-Sampling Calibration/Post-Sampling Calibration Check. The protocols executed at the beginning and end of each sampling day to bracket measurement readings with controlled performance

checks.Page 216 of 228

3.12 Performance-Established Configuration . The EC cell and sampling system configuration that existed at the time that it initially met the performance requirements of this protocol.

4.0 Interferences. When present in sufficient concentrations, NO and NO 2 are two gas species that have been reported to interfere with CO

concentration measurements. In the likelihood of this occurrence, it is the protocol user’s responsibility to employ and properly maintain an appropriate CO EC cell filter or scrubber for removal of these gases, as described in Section

6.2.12. 5.0 Safety. [Reserved] 6.0 Equipment and Supplies. 6.1 What equipment do I need for the measurement system? The system must maintain the gas sample at conditions that will prevent moisture condensation in the sample transport lines, both before and as the sample gas contacts the EC cells. The essential components of the measurement system are described

below. 6.2 Measurement System Components. 6.2.1 Sample Probe . A single extraction-point probe constructed of glass, stainless steel or other non-reactive material, and of length sufficient to reach any designated sampling point. ThePage 217 of 228

sample probe must be designed to prevent plugging due to condensation or particulate matter. 6.2.2 Sample Line . Non-reactive tubing to transport the effluent from the sample probe to the EC cell. 6.2.3 Calibration Assembly (optional) . A three-way valve assembly or equivalent to introduce calibration gases at ambient pressure at the exit end of the sample probe during calibration checks. The assembly must be designed such that only stack gas or calibration gas flows in the sample line and all gases flow through any gas path filters. 6.2.4 Particulate Filter (optional) . Filters before the inlet of the EC cell to prevent accumulation of particulate material in the measurement system and extend the useful life of the components. All filters must be fabricated of materials that are non-reactive to the gas mixtures being sampled. 6.2.5 Sample Pump . A leak-free pump to provide undiluted sample gas to the system at a flow rate sufficient to minimize the response time of the measurement system. If located upstream of the EC cells, the pump must be constructed of a material that is non-reactive to the gas mixtures being sampled. 6.2.8 Sample Flow Rate Monitoring . An adjustable rotameter or equivalent device used to adjust and maintain the sample flow rate through the analyzer as prescribed.Page 218 of 228

6.2.9 Sample Gas Manifold (optional) . A manifold to divert a portion of the sample gas stream to the analyzer and the remainder to a by-pass discharge vent. The sample gas manifold may also include provisions for introducing calibration gases directly to the analyzer. The manifold must be constructed of a material that is non-reactive to the gas mixtures being sampled.

6.2.10 EC cell . A device containing one or more EC cells to

determine the CO and O 2 concentrations in the sample gas stream. The EC cell(s) must meet the applicable performance specifications of Section 13 of this protocol.

6.2.11 Data Recorder . A strip chart recorder, computer or digital recorder to make a record of analyzer output data. The data recorder resolution (i.e., readability) must be no greater than 1 ppm for CO; 0.1 percent for O 2 ; and one degree (either o C

or o F) for temperature. Alternatively, you may use a digital or analog meter having the same resolution to observe and manually record the analyzer responses.

6.2.12 Interference Gas Filter or Scrubber . A device to remove interfering compounds upstream of the CO EC cell. Specificinterference gas filters or scrubbers used in the performanceestablished configuration of the analyzer must continue to be

used. Such a filter or scrubber must have a means to determine when the removal agent is exhausted. Periodically replace orPage 219 of 228

replenish it in accordance with the manufacturer’s

recommendations. 7.0 Reagents and Standards. What calibration gases are needed?

7.1 Calibration Gases . CO calibration gases for the EC cell must be CO in nitrogen or CO in a mixture of nitrogen and O 2. Use CO calibration gases with labeled concentration values certified by the manufacturer to be within ± 5 percent of the label value. Dry ambient air (20.9 percent O 2 ) is acceptable for calibration

of the O 2 cell. If needed, any lower percentage O 2 calibration gas must be a mixture of O 2 in nitrogen.

7.1.1 Up-Scale CO Calibration Gas Concentration. Choose one or more up-scale gas concentrations such that the average of the stack gas measurements for each stack gas sampling run are between 25 and 150 percent of those concentrations. Alternatively, choose an up-scale gas that does not exceed twice the concentration of the applicable outletstandard. If a measured gas value exceeds 150 percent of the upscale CO calibration gas value at any time during the stack gas sampling run, the run must be discarded and repeated.

7.1.2 Up-Scale O 2 Calibration Gas Concentration.

Select an O 2 gas concentration such that the difference between the gas concentration and the average stack gas measurement or reading for each sample run is less than 15 percent O 2 . When the average exhaust gas O 2 readings are above 6 percent, you may usePage 220 of 228

dry ambient air (20.9 percent O 2 ) for the up-scale O 2 calibration

gas.

7.1.3 Zero Gas . Use an inert gas that contains less than 0.25 percent of the up-scale CO calibration gas concentration. You may use dry air that is free from ambient CO and other combustion gas products (e.g., CO 2 ). 8.0 Sample Collection and Analysis 8.1 Selection of Sampling Sites

**.** 8.1.1 Control Device Inlet. Select a sampling site sufficiently downstream of the engine so that the combustion gases should be well mixed. Use a single sampling extraction point near the center of the duct (e.g., within the 10 percent centroidal area), unless instructed otherwise.

8.1.2 Exhaust Gas Outlet. Select a sampling site located at least two stack diameters downstream of any disturbance (e.g.,turbocharger exhaust, crossover junction or recirculation takeoff) and at least one-half stack diameter upstream of the gas discharge to the atmosphere. Use a single sampling extraction point near the center of the duct (e.g., within the 10 percent centroidal area), unless instructed otherwise. 8.2 Stack Gas Collection and Analysis

**.** Prior to the first stack gas sampling run, conduct that the pre-sampling calibration in accordance with Section 10.1. Use Figure 1 to record all data. Zero the analyzer with zero gas. Confirm and record that thePage 221 of 228

scrubber media color is correct and not exhausted. Then position the probe at the sampling point and begin the sampling run at the same flow rate used during the up-scale calibration. Record the start time. Record all EC cell output responses and the flow rate during the “sample conditioning phase” once per minute until constant readings are obtained. Then begin the “measurement data phase” and record readings every 15 seconds for at least two minutes (or eight readings), or as otherwise required to achieve two continuous minutes of data that meet the specification given in Section 13.1. Finally, perform the “refresh phase” by introducing dry air, free from CO and other combustion gases, until several minute-to-minute readings of

consistent value have been obtained. For each run use the “measurement data phase” readings to calculate the average stack gas CO and O 2 concentrations.

8.3 EC Cell Rate. Maintain t he EC cell sample flow rate so thatit does not vary by more than ± 10 percent throughout the presampling calibration, stack gas sampling and post-sampling calibration check. Alternatively, the EC cell sample flow rate can be maintained within a tolerance range that does not affect the gas concentration readings by more than ± 3 percent, as instructed by the EC cell manufacturer. 9.0 Quality Control (Reserved)

10.0 Calibration and StandardizationPage 222 of 228

10.1 Pre-Sampling Calibration

**.** Conduct the following protocol once for each nominal range to be used on each EC cell before performing a stack gas sampling run on each field sampling day. Repeat the calibration if you replace an EC cell before completing all of the sampling runs. There is no prescribed order for calibration of the EC cells; however, each cell must complete the measurement data phase during calibration. Assemble the measurement system by following the manufacturer's recommended protocols including for preparing and preconditioning the EC cell. Assure the measurement system has no leaks and verify the gas scrubbing agent is not depleted. Use Figure 1 to record all data.

10.1.1 Zero Calibration. For both the O 2 and CO cells, introduce zero gas to the measurement system (e.g., at the calibration assembly) and record the concentration reading every minute until readings are constant for at least two consecutive minutes. Include the time and sample flow rate. Repeat the steps in this section at least once to verify the zero calibration for each component gas.

10.1.2 Zero Calibration Tolerance

**.** For each zero gas introduction, the zero level output must be less than or equal to ± 3 percent of the up-scale gas value or ± 1 ppm, whichever is less restrictive, for the CO channel and less than or equal to ± 0.3 percent O 2 for the O 2 channel.Page 223 of 228

10.1.3 Up-Scale Calibration. Individually introduce each calibration gas to the measurement system (e.g., at the calibration assembly) and record the start time. Record all EC cell output responses and the flow rate during this “sample conditioning phase” once per minute until readings are constant for at least two minutes. Then begin the “measurement data phase” and record readings every 15 seconds for a total of two minutes, or as otherwise required. Finally, perform the “refresh phase” by introducing dry air, free from CO and other combustion gases, until readings are constant for at least two consecutive minutes. Then repeat the steps in this section at least once to verify the calibration for each component gas. Introduce all gases to flow through the entire sample handling system (i.e., at the exit end of the sampling probe or the calibration assembly). 10.1.4 Up-Scale Calibration Error

**.** The mean of the difference of the “measurement data phase” readings from the reported standard gas value must be less than or equal to ± 5 percent or ± 1 ppm for CO or ± 0.5 percent O 2 , whichever is less restrictive, respectively. The maximum allowable deviation from the mean measured value of any single "measurement data phase" reading must be less than or equal to ± 2 percent or ± 1 ppm for CO or ± 0.5 percent O 2 , whichever is less restrictive, respectively.Page 224 of 228

10.2 Post-Sampling Calibration Check . Conduct a stack gas postsampling calibration check after the stack gas sampling run or

set of runs and within 12 hours of the initial calibration. Conduct up-scale and zero calibration checks using the protocol in Section 10.1. Make no changes to the sampling system or EC cell calibration until all post-sampling calibration checks have been recorded. If either the zero or up-scale calibration error exceeds the respective specification in Sections 10.1.2 and 10.1.4 then all measurement data collected since the previous

successful calibrations are invalid and re-calibration and resampling are required. If the sampling system is disassembled or the EC cell calibration is adjusted, repeat the calibration check before conducting the next analyzer sampling run. 11.0 Analytical Procedure The analytical procedure is fully discussed in Section 8. 12.0 Calculations and Data Analysis

Determine the CO and O 2 concentrations for each stack gas sampling run by calculating the mean gas concentrations of the data recorded during the “measurement data phase”.

13.0 Protocol Performance Use the following protocols to verify consistent analyzer performance during each field sampling day.

13.1 Measurement Data Phase Performance Check . Calculate the mean of the readings from the “measurement data phase”. ThePage 225 of 228

maximum allowable deviation from the mean for each of the individual readings is ± 2 percent, or ± 1 ppm, whichever is

less restrictive. Record the mean value and maximum deviation for each gas monitored. Data must conform to Section 10.1.4. The EC cell flow rate must conform to the specification in Section

8.3. Example: A measurement data phase is invalid if the maximum deviation of any single reading comprising that mean is greater than ± 2 percent or ± 1 ppm (the default criteria). For example, if the mean = 30 ppm, single readings of below 29 ppm and above 31 ppm are disallowed).

13.2 Interference Check

**.** Before the initial use of the EC cell and interference gas scrubber in the field, and semi-annually thereafter, challenge the interference gas scrubber with NO and

NO 2 gas standards that are generally recognized as representative of diesel-fueled engine NO and NO 2 emission values. Record the responses displayed by the CO EC cell and other pertinent data on Figure 1 or a similar form. 13.2.1 Interference Response

**.** The combined NO and NO 2 interference response should be less than or equal to ± 5 percent of the up-scale CO calibration gas concentration. 13.3 Repeatability Check

**.** Conduct the following check once for each nominal range that is to be used on the CO EC cell within 5 days prior to each field sampling program. If a field samplingPage 226 of 228

program lasts longer than 5 days, repeat this check every 5 days. Immediately repeat the check if the EC cell is replaced or if the EC cell is exposed to gas concentrations greater than 150 percent of the highest up-scale gas concentration. 13.3.1 Repeatability Check Procedure . Perform a complete EC cell sampling run (all three phases) by introducing the CO calibration gas to the measurement system and record the response. Follow Section 10.1.3. Use Figure 1 to record all data. Repeat the run three times for a total of four complete runs. During the four repeatability check runs, do not adjust the system except where necessary to achieve the correct calibration gas flow rate at the analyzer. 13.3.2 Repeatability Check Calculations

**.** Determine the highest and lowest average “measurement data phase” CO concentrations from the four repeatability check runs and record the results on Figure 1 or a similar form. The absolute value of the difference between the maximum and minimum average values recorded must not vary more than ± 3 percent or ± 1 ppm of the up-scale gas value,

whichever is less restrictive. 14.0 Pollution Prevention (Reserved) 15.0 Waste Management (Reserved) 16.0 Alternative Procedures (Reserved)

17.0 ReferencesPage 227 of 228

(1) “Development of an Electrochemical Cell Emission Analyzer Test Protocol”, Topical Report, Phil Juneau, Emission Monitoring, Inc., July 1997. (2) “Determination of Nitrogen Oxides, Carbon Monoxide, and Oxygen Emissions from Natural Gas-Fired Engines, Boilers, and Process Heaters Using Portable Analyzers”, EMC Conditional TestProtocol 30 (CTM-30), Gas Research Institute Protocol GRI96/0008, Revision 7, October 13, 1997. (3) "ICAC Test Protocol for Periodic Monitoring”, EMC Conditional Test Protocol 34 (CTM-034), The Institute of Clean Air Companies, September 8, 1999. (4) “Code of Federal Regulations”, Protection of Environment, 40 CFR, Part 60, Appendix A, Methods 1-4; 10.

Table 1: Appendix A - Sampling Run Data. Facility________________ Engine I.D.______________ Date_________ Run Type: (__) (__) (__) (__) (X) Pre-Sample Stack Gas Post-Sample Repeatability Calibration Sample Cal. Check Check Run # 1 1 2 2 3 3 4 4 T ime Scrub. OK FlowRate Gas 

## O 2 

## CO O 2 

## CO O 2 

## CO O 2 

## CO

Sample Cond. Phase “ “ “ “ Formatted TablePage 228 of 228

Measurement Data Phase “ “ “ “ “ “ “ “ “ “

Mean

Refresh

Phase

“ “ “ “