alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          APR-30-2001
<PERIOD-START>                             MAY-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUL-29-2000
<CASH>                                           2,741
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   71,053
<ALLOWANCES>                                     4,829
<INVENTORY>                                     12,559
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               135,230
<PP&E>                                         105,195
<DEPRECIATION>                                  66,108
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 230,757
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           98,514
<BONDS>                                        117,899
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,159
<OTHER-SE>                                      34,309
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   230,757
<SALES>                                         42,846
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                90,647
<CGS>                                           33,275
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   67,683
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                28,486
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,018
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (7,540)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (7,540)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (7,540)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.69)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.69)


</TABLE>
#### FRANK RENNOLDS & ASSOCIATES, INC., a Florida corporation, Appellant, v. Scott KELLY and Michael Sisson, d/b/a Michael Sisson Organization, Appellees.

No. 67-427.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Third District.

Feb. 13, 1968.

Swink & Swink, Miami, for appellant.

Pallot, Silver, Pallot, Stern & Proby, Miami, for appellee Scott Kelly.

Before CHARLES CARROLL, C. J., and PEARSON and BARKDULL, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the action of the trial judge in dismissing the amended complaint with prejudice. It sought recovery on a purported advertising contract involving a campaign for political office.

The contract sued upon was not executed by a campaign treasurer or deputy campaign treasurer, in accordance with § 99.161(4) (a) (5) (6), Fla.Stat. (1965), F.S.A. Therefore, the trial judge was eminently correct under the authority of Schaal v. Race, Fla.App.1961, 135 So.2d 252.

Affirmed.
# C_2013355EN.01000901.xml

| 5.12.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 355/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.12.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 355/9

---

NOTICE OF OPEN COMPETITION

2013/C 355/08

The European Personnel Selection Office (EPSO) is organising the following open competition:

EPSO/AST/129/13 — Assistants (AST 3) in the following fields:

| 1. | Accounting/Financial management |
| --- | --- |

1.

Accounting/Financial management

| 2. | Economy/Finance |
| --- | --- |

2.

Economy/Finance

| 3. | Legal matters |
| --- | --- |

3.

Legal matters

The competition notice is published in 24 languages in Official Journal C 355 A of 5 December 2013.

Further information can be found on the EPSO website: http://blogs.ec.europa.eu/eu-careers.info/

---
MEMORANDUM TO FILE 

TO: Docket No. EPA-R09-OAR-2013-0009; Approval of Air Quality 

Implementation Plans; Navajo Nation; Regional Haze Requirements for Navajo 

Generating Station; Proposed Rule 

FROM: Anita Lee 

Date: March 11, 2013 

Subject: Record of Meeting with Maricopa Stanfield Irrigation District during Public 

Comment Period 

1. Participants at Meeting 

 Janet McCabe, EPA 

 Tamara Saltman, EPA 

 Phil Lorang, EPA 

 Anita Lee, EPA 

 Grant Ward, MSID 

 Paul Orme, MSID 

 Dan Thelander, MSID 

 Siebe Honstra, MSID 

 Monte Ward, MSID 

2. Date and Location of Meeting: 

 March 11, 2013, Washington, DC 

3. General Statement of the Topic of Discussion: 

 Expressed concerns about statements in EPA’s TSD – page 80-82 and concerns about Energy 

Strategies Report page 79. 

4. Copy of Any Materials Presented or Received (MSID stated they would email materials to EPA 

Region 9 following the meeting – as of 4/2/13, Region 9 has not received materials from MSID): 

 Analysis of proposed rule on NIA 

 MSID water use history 2003 – 2012
Filed 3/28/23 In re D.S. CA5

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for 

publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication 

or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

In re D.S., a Person Coming Under the Juvenile 

Court Law.

THE PEOPLE,

Plaintiff and Respondent,

v.

D.S.,

Defendant and Appellant.

F084790

(Super. Ct. No. JJD072941)

OPINION

THE COURT*

APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Tulare County. Hugo J. Loza, 

Judge.

Helen Hoeffel, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and 

Appellant.

Office of the State Attorney General, Sacramento, California, for Plaintiff and 

Respondent.

-ooOoo-

* Before Hill, P. J., Levy, J. and Franson, J.
2.

Appointed counsel for minor D.S. asked this court to review the record to 

determine whether there are any arguable issues on appeal. (People v. Wende (1979) 25 

Cal.3d 436.) Minor was advised of his right to file a supplemental brief within 30 days of 

the date of filing of the opening brief. Minor did not respond. Finding no arguable error 

that would result in a disposition more favorable to minor, we affirm.

BACKGROUND

Beginning in April 2020, three petitions pursuant to Welfare and Institutions Code 

section 602 were filed against minor. 

Then, on March 4, 2022, officers stopped minor, who was 17 years old, and

two other males in a vehicle that was speeding and had expired registration. A loaded 

weapon with a magazine containing live rounds was found within minor’s reach under 

the passenger seat where he was seated. The officers detained minor. 

On March 8, 2022, a subsequent Welfare and Institutions Code section 602 

petition was filed alleging felony possession of a firearm (Pen. Code, § 29610) and 

misdemeanor possession of live ammunition (Pen. Code, § 29650). 

On May 9, 2022, the juvenile court found the allegations true at a contested 

jurisdictional hearing. 

On June 13, 2022, the juvenile court ordered defendant to continue as a ward on 

probation in his sister’s custody with various terms and conditions. 

On August 11, 2022, minor filed a notice of appeal. 

DISCUSSION

Having undertaken an examination of the entire record, we find no evidence of 

any arguable error that would result in a disposition more favorable to minor.

DISPOSITION

The juvenile court’s findings and orders are affirmed.
#### GULFSTREAM PARK RACING ASSOCIATION, INC., a Florida corporation, Petitioner, v. BOARD OF BUSINESS REGULATION OF the DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS REGULATION et al., Respondents.

No. 73-205.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

May 15, 1973.

*553Landefeld & Romanik, Hollywood, for petitioner.

Herbert M. Klein and J. Riley Davis, Tallahassee, for respondents.

Before BARKDULL, C. J., and PEARSON and HENDRY, JJ.

1

. The “outs book” is a listing of uncashed tickets on which payment is due. By statute the unclaimed fund for payment of tickets escheats to the State of Florida after one year. See Fla.Stat. § 650.164, F.S.A.

PER CURIAM.

The petitioner, Gulfstream Park Racing Association, Inc., has filed in this court a petition for certiorari seeking review of an order of the Board of Business Regulation which denied the request of Gulfstream Park that it be permitted to deduct from the “outs book” 1 twenty uncashed pari-mutuel tickets. Petitioner urges that the record before the Board of Business Regulation was not sufficient to support the decision reached by the Board. Our review of the record convinces us that the record is sufficient.

Petitioner’s second point claims that the factual determination made by the Board is improper because it precludes a determination that pari-mutuel tickets can ever be lost. This contention does not follow from the Board’s decision. We are concerned on this petition for certiorari with the question of whether the record is so devoid of a basis for the Board’s action that the order on review must be quashed. By our order denying certiorari, we do not preclude a trial of the suggested issue at a proper time before an appropriate tribunal.

Petitioner presents an additional point urging that Fla.Stat. § 550.164, F.S. A., is unconstitutional because it fails to provide due process when money held for uncashed tickets escheats to the State of Florida. We hold that this point is not properly before us inasmuch as the order which we are called upon to review makes no reference to escheat, and the findings of fact of the Director of the Division of Pari-Mutuel Wagering conclusively show that the application of the petitioner for a reduction of the “outs” ticket account was made prior to the time that any question of escheat could have arisen. There-fpre, we respectfully decline to pass upon the constitutionality of the statute mentioned.

Accordingly, certiorari is denied.

It is so ordered.
#### SUNRISE COCKTAIL LOUNGE, INC., a Florida corporation, Appellant, v. James J. JAMES, and Rosa Lena Craig, jointly and severally, Appellees.

No. 73-100.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Nov. 6, 1973.

Rehearing Denied Dec. 11, 1973.

Gus Efthimiou, Jr., Miami, for appellant.

Irving Mark Wolff and Ralph H. Bear-den, Jr., Miami, for appellees.

Before BARKDULL, C. J., and PEARSON and HENDRY, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed upon authority of Town of Davie v. Hartline, Fla.1967, 199 So.2d 280; Marinelli v. Weaver, Fla.App.1968, 208 So.2d 489.
**Exhibit
      32.2**





**Form
      of 906
      Certifications**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED**


**PURSUANT
      TO
      SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with
      the Annual Report of U.S. Xpress Enterprises, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K
      for the year ending December 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
      Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned hereby certifies,
      pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350 (as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002) that he is the Chief Financial Officer of the Company and
      that: (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
      or
      15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and (2) the information contained
      in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
      and results of operations of the Company.








/s/
      Ray M.
      Harlin


Ray
      M.
      Harlin


Executive
      Vice
      President of Finance and


Chief
      Financial
      Officer








Date:
      March  ,
      2007
Exhibit 11
                             DETECTION SYSTEMS, INC.
                        COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE
                      (In thousands, except per share data)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

Year Ended March 31,                                1999       1998*      1997
                                                    ----       ----     ----
<S>                                               <C>        <C>        <C>
Net income applicable to common
stock                                             $4,471     $1,382     $3,725
                                                   =====      =====      =====
Weighted average number of shares                  6,319      5,433      4,359
                                                   =====      =====      =====
Basic earnings per share                           $0.71      $0.25      $0.85
                                                   =====      =====      =====
Shares attributable to deferred
compensation plans and stock
options and warrants                                 508        290        575
                                                    ====       ====       ====
Diluted earnings per share:                        $0.65      $0.24      $0.76
                                                    ====       ====       ====
</TABLE>


* Due to losses incurred in the third and fourth quarters,  the effect of shares
attributed to options, warrants and deferred compensation was reduced by 297,000
in arriving at the  year-to-date  weighted  average number of shares included in
diluted earnings per share, to avoid anti-dilution.
# C_2014082EN.01000301.xml

| 21.3.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 82/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.3.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 82/3

---

Notice for the attention of the persons subject to the restrictive measures provided for in Council Decision 2011/172/CFSP and in Council Regulation (EU) No 270/2011 concerning restrictive measures directed against certain persons, entities and bodies in view of the situation in Egypt

2014/C 82/03

The following information is brought to the attention of the persons who are designated in the Annex to Council Decision 2011/172/CFSP and in Annex I to Council Regulation (EU) No 270/2011 concerning restrictive measures directed against certain persons, entities and bodies in view of the situation in Egypt.

The Council of the European Union, after having reviewed the list of persons designated in the above-mentioned Annexes, has determined that the restrictive measures provided for in Council Decision 2011/172/CFSP and in Council Regulation (EU) No 270/2011 should continue to apply to those persons.

The attention of the persons concerned is drawn to the possibility of making an application to the competent authorities of the relevant Member State(s) as indicated on the websites in Annex II to Council Regulation (EU) No 270/2011, in order to obtain an authorisation to use frozen funds for basic needs or specific payments (cf. Article 4 of the Regulation).

The persons concerned may submit a request to the Council before 30 January 2015, together with supporting documentation, that the decision to include them on the above-mentioned list should be reconsidered to the following address:

before 30 January 2015

| Council of the European Union |
| --- |
| General Secretariat |
| DG C 1C |
| Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175 |
| 1048 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |
| E-mail: sanctions@consilium.europa.eu |

Council of the European Union

General Secretariat

DG C 1C

Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175

1048 Bruxelles/Brussel

BELGIQUE/BELGIË

E-mail: sanctions@consilium.europa.eu

Any observations received will be taken into account for the purpose of the Council's next review, in accordance with Article 12 of Regulation (EU) No 270/2011, of the list of designated persons.

---
-79 -78 -77 -76 -75

 38

 39

 40

★

▲▲

▲

▲

★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲

 500

 1000

 1500

 100

18 12 06 00

08/07

NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL

 Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 07 Aug 07

 EDAS Meteorological Data

Source

★ at 38.86 N 77.06 W Meters AGL
DEAR MR Thomas Gardner: I'm a long-time advocate for cleaner water, and have participated fully in 

past Triennial Review sessions with our AR Dept. of Env'l Quality...

I've reviewed your possible changes, A (Antigegradation) through E: (Triennial Reviews) , and 

wholeheartedly suggerst they will be improvements and strengthen the achievements of the EPA.--

I DO APPROVE THEM! Respectfully, W A Saunders (501)664-2539
# C_2014019EN.01003501.xml

| 22.1.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 19/35 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.1.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 19/35

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.6981 — TPG/Servco/Fender Musical Instrument)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2014/C 19/05

On 16 December 2013, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32013M6981. EUR-Lex is the online access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32013M6981. EUR-Lex is the online access to the European law.

---
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 312 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 312

    To amend title 39 of the United States Code to provide for door 
delivery of mail to the physically handicapped, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 5, 1993

 Mr. Quillen introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
               Committee on Post Office and Civil Service

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To amend title 39 of the United States Code to provide for door 
delivery of mail to the physically handicapped, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Mail Delivery to Physically 
Handicapped Act of 1993''.

SEC. 2. DOOR DELIVERY TO THE PHYSICALLY HANDICAPPED.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter IV of chapter 36 of title 39, United 
States Code, is amended by inserting after section 3662 the following 
new section:
``Sec. 3663. Door delivery of mail to the physically handicapped
    ``(a) Door delivery of mail shall be provided by the Postal Service 
to any resident whose application for door delivery of mail is approved 
by the Postal Service under this section.
    ``(b)(1) Any resident may file with the Postal Service, in such 
form and such manner as shall be prescribed by the Postal Service by 
regulation, an application for door delivery of mail under this 
section.
    ``(2) Any such application shall be approved by the Postal Service 
if the application includes a certificate of a licensed physician, in a 
form which shall be prescribed by the Postal Service by regulation, 
stating that the physician has conducted a medical examination of the 
resident and that the examination revealed that the resident is 
physically handicapped to the extent that delivery of mail to such 
resident other than by door delivery would impose an immediate or 
potential medical or physical hardship on such resident.
    ``(c) Door delivery of mail to a resident shall begin immediately 
upon approval by the Postal Service of the application by that resident 
for door delivery of mail under this section.
    ``(d) The Postal Service shall prescribe regulations to carry out 
the provisions of this section.''.
    (b) Table of Sections.--The table of sections for chapter 36 of 
title 39, United States Code, is amended by inserting after the item 
relating to section 3662 the following new item:

``3663. Door delivery of mail to the physically handicapped.''.

                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 24

POWER OF ATTORNEY 

KNOW ALL BY THESE PRESENTS, that each person whose signature appears below constitutes and appoints Suzanne S. Bettman, Andrew B. Coxhead and Daniel N. Leib, or any of them, his or her true and lawful attorney-in-fact and agent, with full power of substitution and resubstitution, in any and all capacities, to sign the Annual Report on Form 10-K of R.R. Donnelley & Sons Company for its fiscal year ended December 31, 2013 and any and all amendments thereto, and to file the same with all exhibits thereto, and other documents in connection therewith, with the Securities and Exchange Commission, granting unto said attorney-in-fact and agent full power and authority to do and perform each and every act and thing requisite and necessary to be done in and about the premises, as fully to all intents and purposes as he or she might or could do in person, hereby ratifying and confirming all that said attorney-in-fact and agent, or her substitute, may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof. This Power of Attorney shall be effective from the date on which it is signed until June 30, 2014. 

Dated:  February 20, 2014

 

| /s/ Susan M. Cameron    |   | /s/ Richard K. Palmer  |
|-------------------------|--------|------------------------|
| Susan M. Cameron        |   | Richard K. Palmer      |
|                    |   |                   |
| /s/ Lee A. Chaden       |   | /s/ John C. Pope       |
| Lee A. Chaden           |   | John C. Pope           |
|                    |   |                   |
| /s/ Richard L. Crandall |   | /s/ Michael T. Riordan |
| Richard L. Crandall     |   | Michael T. Riordan     |
|                    |   |                   |
| /s/ Susan M. Gianinno   |   | /s/ Oliver R. Sockwell |
| Susan M. Gianinno       |   | Oliver R. Sockwell     |
|                    |   |                   |
| /s/ Judith H. Hamilton  |   | /s/ Stephen M. Wolf    |
| Judith H. Hamilton      |   | Stephen M. Wolf        |
|                    |   |                   |
| /s/ Jeffrey G. Katz     |   |                   |
| Jeffrey G. Katz         |   |                   |