### 43414 Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 142 / Tuesday, July 24, 2012 / Notices

Dated: July 18, 2012. Thomas M. Countryman, Assistant Secretary of State for International Security and Nonproliferation.

[FR Doc. 2012–18041 Filed 7–23–12; 8:45 am]

**BILLING CODE 4710–25–P**

**DEPARTMENT OF STATE**

**[Public Notice 7962]**

**Bureau of Political-Military Affairs; Statutory Debarment Under the Arms**  **Export Control Act and the**
**International Traffic in Arms Regulations** 

**ACTION :**  Notice.

**SUMMARY :**  Notice is hereby given that the Department of State has imposed statutory debarment pursuant to § 127.7(c) of the International Traffic in Arms Regulations (‘‘ITAR’’) (22 CFR Parts 120 to 130) on persons convicted of violating, or conspiracy to violate, Section 38 of the Arms Export Control Act, as amended (‘‘AECA’’) (22 U.S.C. 2778). Further, a public notice was published in the Federal Register on Tuesday, November 15, 2011, listing persons statutorily debarred pursuant to the ITAR; this notice makes one
correction to that notice.

**DATES :**  Effective Date: The effective date
is the date of this notice.

**FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT :**  Lisa Aguirre, Director, Office of Defense Trade Controls Compliance, Bureau of Political-Military Affairs, Department of State (202) 632–2798.

**SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION :**  Section 38(g)(4) of the AECA, 22 U.S.C. 2778(g)(4), prohibits the Department of State from issuing licenses or other approvals for the export of defense
articles or defense services where the applicant, or any party to the export, has been convicted of violating certain statutes, including the AECA. The statute permits limited exceptions to be made on a case-by-case basis. In implementing this provision, Section 127.7 of the ITAR provides for ‘‘statutory debarment’’ of any person who has been convicted of violating or conspiring to violate the AECA. Persons subject to statutory debarment are prohibited from participating directly or indirectly in the export of defense articles, including technical data, or in the furnishing of defense services for which a license or other approval is required.

Statutory debarment is based solely upon conviction in a criminal proceeding, conducted by a United States Court, and as such the administrative debarment procedures
outlined in Part 128 of the ITAR are not applicable.

The period for debarment will be determined by the Assistant Secretary for Political-Military Affairs based on the underlying nature of the violations, but will generally be for three years from the date of conviction. Export privileges may be reinstated only at the request of the debarred person followed by the necessary interagency consultations, after a thorough review of the circumstances surrounding the conviction, and a finding that appropriate steps have been taken to mitigate any law enforcement concerns, as required by Section 38(g)(4) of the AECA. Unless export privileges are reinstated, however, the person remains
debarred.

Department of State policy permits debarred persons to apply to the Director, Office of Defense Trade Controls Compliance, for reinstatement beginning one year after the date of the debarment. Any decision to grant reinstatement can be made only after the statutory requirements of Section 38(g)(4) of the AECA have been
satisfied.

Exceptions, also known as transaction exceptions, may be made to thisdebarment determination on a case-bycase basis at the discretion of theAssistant Secretary of State for PoliticalMilitary Affairs, after consulting with the appropriate U.S. agencies. However, such an exception would be granted only after a full review of all circumstances, paying particular attention to the following factors: whether an exception is warranted by overriding U.S. foreign policy or national security interests; whether an exception would further law
enforcement concerns that are consistent with the foreign policy or national security interests of the United States; or whether other compelling
circumstances exist that are consistent with the foreign policy or national security interests of the United States,
and that do not conflict with law
enforcement concerns. Even if exceptions are granted, the debarment continues until subsequent

reinstatement.

Pursuant to Section 38(g)(4) of the AECA and Section 127.7(c) of the ITAR, the following persons are statutorily
debarred as of the date of this notice (Name; Date of Conviction; District; Case No.; Month/Year of Birth): (1) Miguel Avendano-Reyna; April 30, 2012; U.S. District Court, Southern District of Texas; Case No. 7:11CR00999–S1–001; April, 1976. (2) Davoud Baniameri (aka Davoud Baniamery, David Baniameri, David Baniamery); August 12, 2011; U.S. District Court, Northern District of Illinois; Case No. 09–CR–736–1; August, 1972. (3) Donald V. Bernardo; November 16, 2011; U.S. District Court, Southern District of Florida; Case No. 1:10– 60331–CR–SEITZ–1; November,

1938. (4) Jorge Blanco-Castillo; September 20, 2011; U.S. District Court, Southern District of Texas; Case No. 1:11CR00178–001; November, 1969. (5) Igor Bobel; May 11, 2012; U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Pennsylvania; Case No. 11–CR– 00749–HB–1; February, 1968. (6) Oscar Edwardo Cantu; March 21, 2012; U.S. District Court, Southern District of Texas; Case No. 7:11CR00686–S1–001; March, 1980. (7) Henson Chua; November 8, 2011; U.S. District Court, Middle District of Florida; Case No. 8:11–CR–137– T–30AEP; January, 1964. (8) Kue Sang Chun; November 15, 2011; U.S. District Court, Northern District of Ohio; Case No. 1:11CR00009–001; October, 1943. (9) Luz Sylvia Cortez; November 28, 2011; U.S. District Court, Southern District of Texas; Case No. 7:10CR00061–002; April, 1976. (10) Dan Tran Dang; April 16, 2012; U.S. District Court, Central District of California; Case No. SACR 08– 00322–CJC; December, 1954. (11) Santos Isidro de la Paz; May 11, 2012; U.S. District Court, Southern District of Texas; Case No. 7:11CR00396–007; September,

1988. (12) Anna Fermanova; October 26, 2011; U.S. District Court, Eastern District of New York; Case No. CR11– 00008(CBA); July, 1986. (13) Galaxy Aviation Services; June 30, 2011; U.S. District Court, Middle District of Georgia; Case No. 5:10– CR–00058–004–MTT; N/A. (14) Ruslan Gilchenko; February 4, 2011; U.S. District Court, District of Arizona; Case No. CR10–00233– 001–PHX–FJM; October, 1976. (15) Juan Victorian Gimenez; March 21, 2012; U.S. District Court, Southern District of Florida; Case No. 1:11– 20669–CR–MARTINEZ–1; October,

1983. (16) Enrique Gustavo Gonzalez; April 28, 2012; U.S. District Court, Southern District of Texas; Case No. 7:10CR01032–001; September,

1990. (17) Issac Obed Gonzalez; July 11, 2011; U.S. District Court, Southern


### 43415 Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 142 / Tuesday, July 24, 2012 / Notices

District of Texas; Case No. 7:10CR01171–001; October, 1989. (18) Steven Neal Greenoe; January 10, 2012; U.S. District Court, Eastern District of North Carolina; Case No. 5:10–CR–277–1H; November, 1973. (19) Stephen Glen Guerra; February 6, 2012; U.S. District Court, Western District of Texas; Case No. W–11– CR–200(04); February, 1979. (20) Oscar Hernandez-Bravo (aka Oscar Bravo Hernandez); April 4, 2012; U.S. District Court, Southern District of Texas; Case No. 7:09CR00809–S1–001; February,

1971. (21) Chou-Fu Ho; September 20, 2011; U.S. District Court, Southern District of California; Case No. 10CR2415 BTM; September, 1971. (22) Rene Huerta, Jr.; August 16, 2011; U.S. District Court, Southern District of Texas; Case No. 1:10CR01396–001; October, 1972. (23) Liem Duc Huynh (aka Duc Huynh); April 17, 2012; U.S. District Court, Central District of California; Case No. SACR 08–00322–CJC; September, 1959. (24) Octavio Ibarra-Sanchez; February 22, 2012; U.S. District Court, Southern District of Texas; Case No. 7:11CR01518–001; March, 1984. (25) Phillip Andro Jamison; November 8, 2011; U.S. District Court, Southern District of California; Case No. 10CR3618–H; February, 1980. (26) Young Su Kim; August 19, 2011; U.S. District Court, District of Colorado; Case No. 11–cr–00171– LTB–01; August, 1953. (27) Marc Knapp; September 13, 2011; U.S. District Court, District of Delaware; Case No. 10CR108–LPS; December, 1974. (28) Connor H. Kraegel; August 24, 2011; U.S. District Court, District of Maryland; Case No. AW–8–11–CR– 0273–001; October, 1990. (29) Li Li (aka Lea Li); October 3, 2011; U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Virginia; Case No. 1:10CR00207– 002; April, 1978. (30) Mario Julian Martinez-Bernache; March 15, 2012; U.S. District Court, Southern District of Texas; Case No. 1:11CR00759–001; August, 1989. (31) Scott Michael Miller; December 1, 2011; U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York; Case No. 06 Crim. 0566 (DC); August, 1958. (32) Placido Molina, Jr.; March 2, 2012; U.S. District Court, Southern District of Texas; Case No. 1:11CR00530–001; September,

1984. (33) Balraj Naidu; December 20, 2010; U.S. District Court, District of Maryland; Case No. CCB–1–08–CR– 00091–002; February, 1967. (34) Jamal Nehme; May 26, 2011; U.S. District Court, District of Delaware; Case No. 09–CR–74–01 GMS; April,

1963. (35) Joseph Oldani; June 3, 2009; U.S. District Court, Southern District of West Virginia; Case No. 3:08–00287; August, 1987. (36) Timothy Oldani; June 3, 2009; U.S. District Court, Southern District of West Virginia; Case No. 3:09–00010; November, 1984. (37) John Dennis Tan Ong (aka Dennis Ong, John Tan Ong); December 19, 2011; U.S. District Court, Northern District of Georgia; Case No. 1:10– cr–352–JEC–01; November, 1973. (38) Juan Narcizo Oyervides-Campos; November 21, 2011; U.S. District Court, Southern District of Texas; Case No. 7:11CR00338–001; July,

1990. (39) Manuel Mario Pavon; January 13, 2012; U.S. District Court, Southern District of Texas; Case No. 7:11CR01434–S–001; June, 1991. (40) Jerome Stuart Pendzich; October 12, 2011; U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Tennessee; Case No. 3:10–CR–168–001; March, 1977. (41) Lee Roy Perez; December 13, 2011; U.S. District Court, Southern District of Texas; Case No. 7:11CR00389–001; July, 1987. (42) Julio Alejandro Quirino; August 31, 2011; U.S. District Court, Southern District of Texas; Case No. 7:10CR01171–002; November, 1984. (43) Ramadan Rama; July 21, 2011; U.S. District Court, Eastern District of North Carolina; Case No. 5:10–CR– 397–1D; December, 1970. (44) Martin Ramirez-Rodriguez (aka Julian Garcia-Penaloza, AlbertoMoreno-Garza, Machin AguilarGaona); November 9, 2010; U.S. District Court, Northern District of Florida; Case No. 5:10CR39–002– RS; October, 1983. (45) Jose Arturo Ramon-Herrada; February 24, 2012; U.S. District Court, Southern District of Texas; Case No. 7:11CR00853–002; February, 1983. (46) Felix Reyes; July 28, 2011; U.S. District Court, Southern District of Texas; Case No. 7:10CR01500–001; March, 1992. (47) Jose Guadalupe Reyes-Martinez; November 21, 2011; U.S. District Court, Southern District of Texas; Case No. 7:11CR00396–010; September, 1982. (48) Adrian Jesus Reyna; January 27, 2012; U.S. District Court, Western District of Texas; Case No. W–11– CR–200(01); July, 1986. (49) Gerardo Domingo Rodriguez-Rivera; January 13, 2012; U.S. District Court, Southern District of Texas; Case No. 7:11CR01434–S–002; June,

1993. (50) Nestor Omar Sauceda-Trevino; July 18, 2011; U.S. District Court, Southern District of Texas; Case No. 1:11CR00240–001; May, 1990.

(51) Hamid Seifi, (aka Hank Seifi); July 5, 2011; U.S. District Court, Middle District of Georgia; Case No. 5:10–CR– 00058–003–MTT; March, 1963.

(52) Chan Hok Shek, (aka John Chan); September 27, 2011; U.S. District Court, District of Massachusetts; Case No. 1:08–CR–10317–001–DPW; December,

1953.

(53) Andrew Silcox; March 1, 2012; U.S. District Court, Western District of Texas; Case No. SA–11–CR–883(1)FB; March, 1958.

(54) Oscar Sorroza-Garcia; July 5, 2011; U.S. District Court, Southern District of California; Case No. 09CR3600–BEN; October, 1973.

(55) Staff Gasket Manufacturing Corp.; September 15, 2011; U.S. District Court, District of New Jersey; Case No. 2:CR11– 0256–01; N/A.

(56) Swiss Technology, Inc.; November 15, 2011; U.S. District Court, District of New Jersey; Case No. 2:11– CR–473–JLL–01; N/A.

(57) Leonardo Talamantez; April 23, 2012; U.S. District Court, Western District of Texas; Case No. DR–11–CR– 1354(2)–AM; July, 1986.

(58) The Parts Guys, LLC; November 3, 2011; U.S. District Court, Middle District of Georgia; Case No. 5:10–CR– 00058–002–MTT; N/A.

(59) Michael Edward Todd; November 8, 2011; U.S. District Court, Middle District of Georgia; Case No. 5:10–CR– 00058–001–MTT; June, 1980.

(60) Alfonso Torres; May 12, 2012; U.S. District Court, Southern District of Texas; Case No. 7:11CR00687–001; October, 1970.

(61) Hong Wei Xian, (aka Harry Zan); October 3, 2011; U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Virginia; Case No. 1:10CR00207–001; December, 1978.

(62) Lian Yang; October 27, 2011; U.S. District Court, Western District of Washington; Case No. 2:11CR00094TSZ–001; February, 1964.

(63) Nguessan Yao; December 15, 2011; U.S. District Court, Northern District of California; Case No. CR–10– 00434–002; January, 1955.

(64) Edgar Daniel Zapata; April 30, 2012; U.S. District Court, Southern District of Texas; Case No. 7:11CR00396–001; August, 1980.

As noted above, at the end of the three-year period following the date of this notice, the above named persons/ entities remain debarred unless export privileges are reinstated.


### 43416 Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 142 / Tuesday, July 24, 2012 / Notices

Debarred persons are generally ineligible to participate in activity regulated under the ITAR (see e.g., sections 120.1(c) and (d), and 127.11(a)). Also, under Section 127.1(c) of the ITAR, any person who has knowledge that another person is subject to debarment or is otherwise ineligible may not, without disclosure to and written approval from the Directorate of Defense Trade Controls, participate, directly or indirectly, in any export in which such ineligible person may
benefit there from or have a direct or
indirect interest therein.

Further, Federal Register document 2011–29470, published at 76 FR 70805, Tuesday, November 15, 2011, is corrected on page 70807, line 12 through line 15 to read as follows:

1. Andrew V. ODonnell; August 1, 2011; U.S. District Court, Northern District of Georgia; Case No. 1:10–CR– 491–CAP; July, 1977. That notice of statutory debarment incorrectly identified the debarred party
as ‘‘Andrew V. O’Donnell’’ and the
Month/Year of birth of the debarred party as ‘‘July, 1997.’’

This notice is provided for purposes of making the public aware that the persons listed above are prohibited from participating directly or indirectly in activities regulated by the ITAR, including any brokering activities and in any export from or temporary import
into the United States of defense articles, related technical data, or
defense services in all situations covered by the ITAR. Specific case information may be obtained from the
Office of the Clerk for the U.S. District Courts mentioned above and by citing the court case number where provided.

Dated: July 17, 2012. Andrew J. Shapiro,Assistant Secretary, Bureau of PoliticalMilitary Affairs, Department of State.

[FR Doc. 2012–18043 Filed 7–23–12; 8:45 am]

**BILLING CODE 4710–25–P**

**OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES**
**TRADE REPRESENTATIVE**

**Notice of Meeting of the Industry Trade Advisory Committee on Small and**  **Minority Business (ITAC–11)**

**AGENCY :**  Office of the United States Trade Representative.

**ACTION :**  Notice of a partially opened meeting.

**SUMMARY :**  The Industry Trade Advisory Committee on Small and Minority Business (ITAC–11) will hold a meeting on Friday, August 10, 2012, from 9:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. The meeting will be opened to the public from 1:00 p.m. to 4:00 p.m.

**DATES :**  The meeting is scheduled for August 10, 2012, unless otherwise
notified.

**ADDRESSES :**  The meeting will be held at the University Club Atop Symphony Towers, San Diego, CA.

**FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT :**  Laura Hellstern, DFO for ITAC–11 at (202) 482–3222, Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230.

**SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION :**  The Agenda topics to be discussed are:

—Pre-Decisional Deliberations on a

draft Letter of Recommendation on U.S. & Foreign Commercial Service Proposed New Increases in Fees.
—Access to and use of U.S. Small

Business Administration State Trade and Export Promotion (STEP) Grants by San Diego-area business. —Congressional perspective on trade

barriers for small and minority
business. —Update on pending trade legislation

that would impact small and minority
businesses.

Christine L. Turner, Assistant U.S. Trade Representative, Intergovernmental Affairs and Public Engagement.

[FR Doc. 2012–18016 Filed 7–23–12; 8:45 am]

**BILLING CODE 3190–W2–P**

**DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION**

**Office of the Secretary**

**[Docket DOT–OST–2010–0235]**

**Application of Star Marianas Air, Inc. for Commuter Authority** 

**AGENCY :**  Department of Transportation.

**ACTION :**  Notice of Order to Show Cause (Order 2012–7–21).

**SUMMARY :**  The Department of Transportation is directing all interested persons to show cause why it should not issue an order tentatively finding Star Marianas Air, Inc., fit, willing, and able to provide scheduled passenger service as a commuter air carrier using small aircraft pursuant to Part 135 of the Federal Aviation Regulations.

**DATES :**  Persons wishing to file objections should do so no later than July 31, 2012.

**ADDRESSES :**  Objections and answers to objections should be filed in Docket
DOT–OST–2010–0235 and addressed to U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket Operations, (M–30, Room W12– 140), 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., West Building Ground Floor, Washington, DC 20590, and should be served upon the parties listed in Attachment A to the
order.

**FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT :**  Catherine J. O’Toole, Air Carrier Fitness Division (X–56, Room W86–489), U.S. Department of Transportation, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590, (202) 366–9721.

Dated: July 17, 2012.
Susan L. Kurland, Assistant Secretary for Aviation and International Affairs.

[FR Doc. 2012–18042 Filed 7–23–12; 8:45 am]

**BILLING CODE P**

**DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION**

**ITS Industry Forum on Connected Vehicles: Moving From Research**  **Towards Implementation; Notice of Public Meeting** 

**AGENCY :**  ITS Joint Program Office, Research and Innovative Technology Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation.

**ACTION :**  Notice.

The U.S. Department of Transportation (USDOT) Intelligent Transportation System Joint Program Office (ITS JPO) will host a free public meeting and webinar to provide updates and promote a lively discussion on theConnected Vehicle Safety, Vehicle-toInfrastructure, and Testing programs; along with a special session discussing lessons learned in deploying ITS. The public meeting will take place September 25–27, 2012, 9:00 a.m.–4:30 p.m. at the Hyatt Regency Chicago, 151 East Wacker Drive, Chicago, Illinois, USA 60601, 312–565–1234. Persons planning to attend the meeting or participate in the webinar should register online at www.itsa.org/ safetymeeting no later than August 30,

2012.

The goal of the meeting and webinar is to identify where we are and what remains in getting to the 2013 decision on Vehicle Communications for Safety, discuss what is evolving in terms of a
robust Vehicle-to-Infrastructure environment, and identify what we have learned from past ITS deployments that can help with success for the future.

About the Connected Vehicle Research Program at USDOT

Connected Vehicle research at USDOT is a multimodal program that involves using wireless communication between vehicles, infrastructure, and personal communications devices to