alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32


Section 906 Certification





Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to


18 U.S.C. § 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002








Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officers of FelCor Lodging Trust Incorporated (the “Company”) hereby certify, to such officers' knowledge, that:





(i) the accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2010 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;





and





(ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated:  February 24, 2011








/s/Richard A. SmithRichard A. SmithChief Executive Officer/s/Andrew J. WelchAndrew J. WelchChief Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUL-01-2000
<CASH>                                           2,254
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   38,713
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (1,105)
<INVENTORY>                                     32,691
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                81,514
<PP&E>                                          52,324
<DEPRECIATION>                                (10,425)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 238,472
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           45,979
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                      4,784
<COMMON>                                        32,143
<OTHER-SE>                                     (8,362)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   238,472
<SALES>                                        142,706
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               142,706
<CGS>                                          121,821
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   12,894
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               8,033
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (42)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       576
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               7991
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (618)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.18)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
# C_2014408EN.01003001.xml

| 15.11.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 408/30 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.11.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 408/30

---

EUROPEAN CHEMICALS AGENCY

Publication of the final accounts for the financial year 2013

2014/C 408/30

The complete version of the final accounts may be found at the following address:

http://echa.europa.eu/documents/10162/13611/echa_annual_accounts_2013_en.pdf

---
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-6427

HAYWARD LEON ROGERS,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

COLIE L. RUSHTON; HENRY MCMASTER, Attorney

General,

Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Anderson. Margaret B. Seymour, District Judge.

(8:05-cv-01555-MBS)

Submitted: June 22, 2006 Decided: July 3, 2006

Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Hayward Leon Rogers, Appellant Pro Se. Derrick K. McFarland,

OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF SOUTH CAROLINA, Columbia, South

Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Hayward Leon Rogers seeks to appeal the district court’s

order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and

dismissing without prejudice his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000) petition.

The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge

issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)

(2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a

substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28

U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by

demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that any

assessment of the constitutional claims by the district court is

debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by

the district court is likewise debatable. Miller-El v. Cockrell,

537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484

(2000); Rose v. Lee, 252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001). We have

independently reviewed the record and conclude that Rogers has not

made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of

appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
# C_2013214EN.01000702.xml

| 27.7.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 214/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.7.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 214/7

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.6970 — The Blackstone Group/Multi Corporation)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2013/C 214/04

On 22 July 2013, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32013M6970. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32013M6970. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.

---
<PAGE>


                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.7

                                 AMENDMENT NO. 2
                                     TO THE
                             DEL LABORATORIES, INC.
                          EMPLOYEE 401(K) SAVINGS PLAN

         WHEREAS, by the provisions of Article X of the Del Laboratories, Inc.
Employee 401(k) Savings Plan ("Plan"), the Employer has the right to amend the
Plan; and

         WHEREAS, the Employer wishes to amend certain provisions of the Plan;

         NOW THEREFORE, the Plan shall be and it is hereby amended as follows:

                                  FIRST CHANGE

Effective April 1, 2000, Article 1.13 shall be amended to read as follows:

"1.13    "Entry Date" shall mean January 1, April 1, July 1 and October 1."

                                  SECOND CHANGE

Effective April 1, 2000, Article 2.01 shall be amended to read as follows:

"2.01    INITIAL ELIGIBILITY

         Each Employee other than Leased Employees or collectively-bargained
employees shall be eligible to become a Participant on the Entry Date following
such Employee's date of hire and attainment of age twenty-one (21) provided he
is still an Employee on the date as of which admission to participate becomes
effective."

                                  THIRD CHANGE

Effective April 1, 2000, Article 3.02(a) shall be amended to read as follows:

"3.02    SALARY REDUCTION CONTRIBUTIONS.

(a)      Each Participant may elect to accept a reduction in salary
         from the Employer equal to any whole percentage of his
         Compensation, from one percent (1%) to twenty percent (20%) of
         such Compensation without

<PAGE>


         regard to the  salary  reduction,  subject to the right of the
         Employer  to amend or revoke  the  Participant's  election  as
         provided in subsection (b) below. The Employer will contribute
         to the Trust the amount of each Participant's Salary Reduction
         Contribution to be held in the Participant's Account."

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Employer has executed this amendment to the
Plan this 16th day of March, 2000.

                                             DEL LABORATORIES, INC.

                                             By  s/ Gene Wexler
                                             Authorized Officer of the Employer
# C_2013253EN.01000101.xml

| 3.9.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 253/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.9.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 253/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.6828 — Delta Air Lines/Virgin Group/Virgin Atlantic Limited)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2013/C 253/01

On 20 June 2013, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32013M6828. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32013M6828. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.

---
#### Mrs. Vera E. JACKSON v. Mrs. J. P. WALKER, Sheriff & Tax Collector.

No. 45938.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

Oct. 26, 1970.

Sam P. Cooper, Jr., Picayune, for appellant.

Entry of Appearance by L. Jack Stewart, Picayune, but no brief of appellee filed.

GILLESPIE, Presiding Justice.

The appellant filed a brief and an assignment of error. No brief was filed by the appellee. The case was submitted without argument.

In United States F. & G. Co. v. State for Use and Benefit of Tompkins, 204 So.2d 852 (Miss.1967), this Court stated:

> The failure to file this brief (by the appellee) is tantamount to a confession of error, and will be accepted as such, and the jugment of the court below will be reversed, since an answer to the appellant’s brief cannot be safely made by us, without our doing that which the appel-lee, by its attorney, should have done, i. e., brief the appellee’s side of the case. This we are not called on to do, therefore the case falls within, and is governed by, W. T. Raleigh Co. v. Armstrong, 165 Miss. 380, 140 So. 527 (1932). (204 So.2d at 852-853).

Since the appellant’s brief in the case at bar makes out an apparent case of error, we do not regard it our obligation to look to the record to find a way to avoid the force of the appellant’s argument.

Reversed. Judgment rendered for the appellant.

RODGERS, JONES, SMITH and ROBERTSON, JJ., concur.
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 3312

To direct the Secretary of the Interior to revise a map relating to the

Coastal Barrier Resources System.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

OCTOBER 19, 1993

Mr. PICKETT introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Merchant Marine and Fisheries

A BILL

To direct the Secretary of the Interior to revise a map

relating to the Coastal Barrier Resources System.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. TECHNICAL REVISIONS TO MAP.

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of the Interior

5 shall, before the end of the 30-day period beginning on

6 the date of the enactment of this Act, make such technical

7 revisions to the map described in subsection (b) as are

8 necessary to ensure that depictions on that map of areas

9 as ‘‘otherwise protected areas’’—
2

•HR 3312 IH

1 (1) do not include any area that is not an oth2 erwise protected area within the meaning of that

3 term under section 12 of the Coastal Barrier Im4 provement Act of 1990 (16 U.S.C. 3503 note); and

5 (2) do not include any of the area described as

6 follows:

7 Beginning at a point located at the intersection

8 of the westerly right-of-way line of the present Sand9 piper Road (60.00 feet wide) at the northern prop10 erty line of the property now owned by the City of

11 Virginia Beach, acquired by deed from Washington’s

12 Forest, Inc., dated December 26, 1965, and duly re13 corded in the Circuit Court of the City of Virginia

14 Beach, Virginia, in Deed Book 932 page 32, and

15 running; thence—

16 (A) south 82 degrees, 50 minutes, 00 sec17 onds west, a distance of 1615.19 feet to a

18 point; thence,

19 (B) north 08 degrees, 00 minutes, 00 sec20 onds west, a distance of 531.84 feet to a point;

21 thence,

22 (C) north 78 degrees, 33 minutes, 00 sec23 onds east, a distance of 2268.56 feet to a point;

24 thence,
3

•HR 3312 IH

1 (D) south 11 degrees, 27 minutes, 00 sec2 onds east, a distance 302.06 feet to a point;

3 thence,

4 (E) south 82 degrees, 50 minutes, 00 sec5 onds west, a distance of 110.15 feet to a point;

6 thence,

7 (F) south 15 degrees, 06 minutes, 52 sec8 onds east, a distance of 403.88 feet to a point;

9 thence, and

10 (G) south 82 degrees, 50 minutes, 00 sec11 onds west, a distance of 607.55 feet to the

12 point or place of beginning;

13 containing approximately 31.4 acres.

14 (b) MAP DESCRIBED.—The map referred to in sub15 section (a) is—

16 (1) included in a set of maps entitled ‘‘Coastal

17 Barrier Resources System’’, dated October 24, 1990;

18 and

19 (2) entitled ‘‘Back Bay Unit, VA–62P’’.

Æ
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 160 (Friday, August 17, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Page 41093]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-17785]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


Center for Scientific Review; Notice of Closed Meetings

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended, notice is hereby given of the following meetings.
    The meetings will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: Center for Scientific Review Special Emphasis 
Panel; PAR-17-144: Limited Competition: National Primate Research 
Centers (P51).
    Date: September 11-14, 2018.
    Time: 8:00 a.m. to 12:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: Hotel Vintage Portland, 422 SW Broadway, Portland, OR 
97205.
    Contact Person: Brian H. Scott, Ph.D., Scientific Review 
Officer, National Institutes of Health, Center for Scientific 
Review, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Bethesda, MD 20892, 301-827-7490, 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#4220302b232c31212d3636022f232b2e6c2c2b2a6c252d34"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="6604140f07081505091212260b070f0a48080f0e48010910">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Name of Committee: Brain Disorders and Clinical Neuroscience 
Integrated Review Group; Pathophysiological Basis of Mental 
Disorders and Addictions Study Section.
    Date: September 13-14, 2018.
    Time: 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: Renaissance Orlando at SeaWorld, 6677 Sea Harbor Drive, 
Orlando, FL 32821.
    Contact Person: Boris P. Sokolov, Ph.D., Scientific Review 
Officer, Center for Scientific Review, National Institutes of 
Health, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Room 5217A, MSC 7846, Bethesda, MD 
20892, 301-408-9115, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#5e3c2d3135313231281e3d2d2c7030373670393128"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="583a2b37333734372e183b2b2a76363130763f372e">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.306, 
Comparative Medicine; 93.333, Clinical Research, 93.306, 93.333, 
93.337, 93.393-93.396, 93.837-93.844, 93.846-93.878, 93.892, 93.893, 
National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: August 13, 2018.
Sylvia L. Neal,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2018-17785 Filed 8-16-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### Clarence Ervin BLACK, M.D. v. Carol MOORE, wife of Clarence Ervin BLACK, M.D.

No. 53911.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Jan. 14, 1974.

Concurring Opinion Jan. 31, 1974.

A. D. Freeman, Morphy, Freeman, Hol-brook & Faulkner, New Orleans, for defendant-relator.

Sydney J. .Parlongue, Philip R. Riegel, Jr., New Orleans, for plaintiff-respondent.

TATE, Justice.

We granted supervisory writs, 281 So.2d 760 (La. 1973), to review the trial court’s issuance of a restraining order without bond. On the plaintiff-husband’s application, the order without bond not only restrained the defendant-wife from disposing or encumbering community property, La.C. Civ.P. art. 3944, but also from harassing the plaintiff by telephone calls-to his office or to his associates.

The restraining order was issued on August 16, 1973, in connection with the husband’s suit for separation and divorce.After a motion by the wife to dissolve the order was dismissed, the husband himself dismissed the suit for separation. In consequence, the ancillary interlocutory restraining order was also vacated.

The issue of the proper issuance or not. of the restraining order is therefore moot.

*612Upon dissolution of a wrongfully obtained restraining order, the party restrained may recover damages and attorney’s fees. La.C.Civ.P. art. 3608. In this instance, however, the wife subject to the restraining order has no cause of action against her husband for any wrongful issuance. For La.R.S. 9:291 (1960) provides that a married woman may not sue her spouse during the existence of the marriage except in certain limited instances, which do *not*include a cause of action in the respect noted.

Therefore, no relief can be granted the relator-wife in the instant suit. The issue before us is thus moot. This court will not ordinarily rule upon a moot issue where our decree can give no practical relief to the parties before us. State ex rel. Preston v. Henderson, 283 So.2d 230 (La. 1973).

Our ruling here is not intended to affect the liability, if any, of the husband as head and master of the community to the wife’s attorney for his reasonable ■' fee arising from the defense of an unsuccessful suit for separation or divorce brought by the husband against the wife. See summary of jurisprudence in Tanner v. Tanner, 229 La. 399, 86 So.2d 80, 82-84 (1956).

For the reasons assigned, the writ is recalled, and the relator’s application for writs is dismissed as moot.

Writ recalled and application dismissed as moot.

SUMMERS, J., concurs in the decree and assigns reasons.

SUMMERS, Justice

(concurring).

I see no need for this opinion to go into the question of the husband’s liability, if any, as head and master of the community to the wife’s attorney for fees arising from the defense of an unsuccessful suit for separation or divorce brought by the husband against the wife. This question is not before us and we should not suggest the litigation and probable outcome of questions between spouses which may best be left in repose.
EXHIBIT 32

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of The Banker's Store, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended May 31, 2005 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Paul D.
Clark, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that based on my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Dated: September 7, 2005                    /s/ Paul D. Clark
                                            -----------------
                                            Paul D. Clark
                                            President, Chief Executive Officer,
                                            and Chief Financial Officer


                                       16