alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23-C
 
                        CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS
 
We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No.
33-63875 on Form S-3, Registration Statement No. 333-09679 on Form S-8,
Registration Statement No. 333-17517 on Form S-3, Registration Statement No.
333-38377 on Form S-8, Registration Statement No. 333-41829 on Form S-8,
Registration Statement No. 333-48953 on Form S-8, Registration Statement No.
333-57603 on Form S-8, and Registration Statement No. 333-65081 on Form S-8 of
our report dated October 10, 1996 on the consolidated statements of income, cash
flows and changes in stockholders' equity of Veritas DGC Inc. and subsidiaries
for the year ended July 31, 1996 appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K
for the year ended July 31, 1998.
 
DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
 
Houston, Texas
October 2, 1998
EXHIBIT 23.2

            CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
            --------------------------------------------------------

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements (Forms S-8 Nos. 33-78296, 33-84554, and 33-11765) of Hydron
Technologies, Inc. and the related prospectuses of our audit report dated
February 20, 2007 with respect to the consolidated balance sheet at December 31,
2006 and consolidated statements of operations, changes in shareholders' equity
(deficit) and cash flows of Hydron Technologies, Inc. for the year ended
December 31, 2006 in the Form 10-KSB.

/s/ SHERB & CO., LLP

Boca Raton, Florida
April 2, 2007
#### AMERICAN EXPRESS COMPANY, Appellant, v. HABERSIN CAMERA SHOPS, INC., Appellee.

No. 68-174.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Third District.

April 23, 1968.

Walton, Lantaff, Schroeder, Carson & Wahl, Miami, for appellant.

Richard C. Carter, Jr., Miami, for ap-pellee.

Before PEARSON, HENDRY and SWANN, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

This is a certificate under Rule 4.6, Florida Appellate Rules, 32 F.S.A., from the Circuit Court of Dade County, sitting as an appellate court, in an appeal from a small claims court. We do not think the question certified is properly before this court. The circuit court has final appellate jurisdiction of all cases arising in the small claims court. Therefore, the question is hereby denied. Jaworski v. City of Opa-Locka, Fla.1963, 149 So.2d 33.
#### Cleveland HOLLINGSHEAD, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. J-45 Merged with Nos. G-22 and H-60.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. First District.

Dec. 19, 1967.

See also, Fla., 188 So.2d 788.

Joe J. Harrell, of Harrell, Caro, Middle-brooks & Wiltshire, Pensacola, for appellant.

Earl Faircloth, Atty. Gen., and R. Grable Stoutamire, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Pursuant to the opinion of the Supreme Court of Florida in Hollingshead v. Wainwright,1 this Court entered its order affording to Hollingshead, in the name of habeas corpus, the opportunity of full appellate review of his judgment of conviction of robbery in the Court of Record, Escambia County, Florida, on June 9, 1963. We appointed Joe Harrell, Esquire, to serve as Appellant’s attorney in this proceeding, and he has ably performed his responsibilities by presenting to this Court every possible grievance that Hollingshead might have suffered in the trial of the cause.

We have considered at length the trial proceedings, the transcript of record and the briefs of the parties, and conclude that the eight points on appeal urged by Appellant are without merit. Suffice it to say that there was ample substantial evidence to support the verdict of the jury, which *352was fairly instructed as to the applicable law.

This Court having afforded Hollingshead a full appellate review in the name of habe-as corpus and having found an absence of reversible error as to the trial of the cause, we, therefore, decline to issue the writ.

RAWLS,' Acting C. J., JOHNSON and SPECTOR, JJ., concur.

1

. Hollingshead v. Wainwright, 194 So.2d 577 (Fla.1967). Also see Hollingshead v. Wainwright, 384 U.S. 31, 86 S.Ct. 1284, 16 L.Ed.2d 333.
Exhibit







November 8, 2016




Mr. Babatunde (Segun) Omidele
6407 Grand Canyon Gate
Katy, TX 77450
RE:  RETENTION BONUS


Erin Energy Corporation (the “Company”) is pleased to hereby offer you a retention bonus (the “Bonus”) that will be earned and paid on the following conditions:


		
	1.
	The Bonus will be earned by you on May 26, 2019 if you are still employed with the Company:




		
	2.
	If your employment terminates at any time before May 26, 2019, for any reason, the right to the Bonus, or any portion thereof, will lapse and be forfeited;




		
	3.
	The amount of the Bonus will equal the sum of two times your then current (on May 26, 2019) annual  Base Salary (as defined in your employment agreement); and




The Bonus will be paid in twenty-four equal monthly installments commencing on the last day of the first month following the termination of your employment with the Company.


If you are in agreement with the terms set forth herein, please sign below.
    


ERIN ENERGY CORPORATION




By:  
          Heidi Wong
Senior Vice President
Corporate Services




EMPLOYEE ACKNOWLEDGEMENT AND AGREEMENT:




Employee Signature:             Date:   November 14, 2016  
Babatunde (Segun) Omidele
#### KARL v. FLORIDA REAL ESTATE COMMISSION.

No. 39378.

Supreme Court of Florida.

March 1970.

Certiorari denied without opinion. 229 So.2d 610.
DJI S1000 PRE-FLIGHT CHECKLIST

BEFORE DEPARTING FOR SITE CHECK

Aircraft (AC) and Remote Controller (RC) batteries fully charged

Tablet fully charged

Portable Radio for communicating with manned AC fully charged

Ensure SD card has free space and is inserted into the camera

Ensure Firmware is updated on AC and RC(s)

Cache location maps into all DJI Pilot app devices

Check for frequency (FX) used by local manned AC (Skyvector.com)

Check if flight location is in No-Fly Zone (Check here: airmap.io)

Program local FX into portable radio

Check for NOTAMs and Temporary Flight Restrictions (TFRs) 

Check weather

 Precipitation less than 5-10%

 Winds under 20kts

 Cloud layer above 500' (152M)

 1 statute mile visibility

LOCATION ON-SITE CHECK

Check flying area free of overhead obstructions

 Wires, low flying AC, trees, tall buildings

 Antennas that may interfere with compass and GPS reception

Weather meets conditions

 Winds under 20 kts (23 MPH or 10 meters per second)

 Clouds above 500’ (152M)

 Visibility for 1 statute mile

Confirm flight plan with camera operator and/or spotter
PHYSICAL AIRCRAFT CHECK

Desired ND filter attached to camera

Camera locked in place

SD card in camera

Motors clear of Foreign Object Debris (FOD)

Check propellers for any melting, misshapen, or cracks

Propellers hand tight

Prop locks firmly 

REMOTE CONTROLLER CHECK

Antennas oriented Properly

Switch to P-GPS mode

Landing gear switch oriented down

Check battery level of RC for minimum 95%

DJI GO APP CHECK

Maximum Flight altitude set 121 Meters (400’)

Failsafe Mode, Set for 10M Clearance above lowest obstacle in flight plan

RC Signal Lost set to Return-to-Home

Check Sensors

 Gyroscope between “-1.0 to +1.0”

 Acceleration between “-1.0 to +1.0”

 Compass MOD between “1400 - 1599”

 Check IMU

Image Transmission Channel set

Note: Watch channels for 30 seconds to ensure selected channel is indeed stable

Battery Cells all 4.28V or greater

 At least 98% battery

 Ensure no greater than .2V between battery cells

Adjust Gimbal Roll to make level

Ensure enough Satellites are locked (recommend 16)
Set Camera Orientation mode

Turn all devices to airplane mode

Face AC into the wind

Check heading of Aircraft

Start Video recording

Start Propellers using a Combined Stick Command (CSC)

Ensure blue dot representing RC is accurately located on map

Ensure home point is accurately set on map

Ensure elevation reads 0 (zero)
# Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

Mar ch 25, 2020

No. 04

- 19

- 00788

- CR

Frank Coty FALZON

, Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 379th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2017CR3240

Honorable Ron Rangel, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

Appellant’s motion for extension of time is GRANTED. We ORDER appellant to file his

brief on or before April 24, 2020. N o further extensions will be granted.

_________________________________ Liz a A. Rodriguez , Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 25th day of March, 2020

.

___________________________________ M ichael A. C ruz

, Clerk of Court
EXHIBIT 99(i)

                             CERTIFICATION PURSUANT
                            TO 18 U.S.C SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of Hydron Technologies, Inc. (the
"Registrant") on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2002 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 31, 2003, hereof (the "Report"),
the undersigned officers certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 5 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.


                                        HYDRON TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

                                           /s/ Richard Banakus
                                          ---------------------------
                                             Richard Banakus
                                             Chief Executive Officer
                                             March 31, 2003
This site uses Cascading Style Sheets to present information. Therefore, it may not display properly when disabled.

This site requires Javascript enabled to retrieve and display data.

# U.S. Census Bureau		Highest Density	

### 

 | 

###
103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 3167

AMENDMENTS
In the Senate of the United States,

October 28 (legislative day, October 13), 1993.

Resolved, That the bill from the House of Representatives (H.R. 3167) entitled ‘‘An Act to extend the emergency

unemployment compensation program, to establish a system

of worker profiling, and for other purposes’’ do pass with the

following

AMENDMENTS:

1 Ω1æPage 11, line 2, strike out ø1994’’.¿ and insert:

2 1994’’.

3 SEC. 9. REDUCTION OF FEDERAL FULL-TIME EQUIVALENT

4 POSITIONS.

5 (a) DEFINITION.—For purposes of this section, the

6 term ‘‘agency’’ means an Executive agency as defined under

7 section 105 of title 5, United States Code, but does not in8 clude the General Accounting Office.

9 (b) LIMITATIONS ON FULL-TIME EQUIVALENT POSI10 TIONS.—The President, through the Office of Management

11 and Budget (in consultation with the Office of Personnel
2

HR 3167 EAS

1 Management), shall ensure that the total number of full2 time equivalent positions in all agencies shall not exceed—

3 (1) 2,095,182 during fiscal year 1994;

4 (2) 2,044,100 during fiscal year 1995;

5 (3) 2,003,846 during fiscal year 1996;

6 (4) 1,963,593 during fiscal year 1997;

7 (5) 1,923,339 during fiscal year 1998; and

8 (6) 1,883,086 during fiscal year 1999;

9 (c) MONITORING AND NOTIFICATION.—The Office of

10 Management and Budget, after consultation with the Office

11 of Personnel Management, shall—

12 (1) continuously monitor all agencies and make

13 a determination on the first date of each quarter of

14 each applicable fiscal year of whether the require15 ments under subsection (b) are met; and

16 (2) notify the President and the Congress on the

17 first date of each quarter of each applicable fiscal

18 year of any determination that any requirement of

19 subsection (b) is not met.

20 (d) COMPLIANCE.—If at any time during a fiscal year,

21 the Office of Management and Budget noifies the President

22 and the Congress that any requirement under subsection (b)

23 is not met, no agency may hire any employee for any posi24 tion in such agency until the Office of Mangement and

25 Budget notifies the President and the Congress that the total
3

HR 3167 EAS

1 number of full-time equivalent positions for all agencies

2 equals or is less than the applicable number required under

3 subsection (b).

4 (e) WAIVER.—Any provision of this section may be

5 waived upon—

6 (1) a determination by the President of the exist7 ence of war or a national security requirement; or

8 (2) the enactment of a joint resolution upon an

9 affirmative vote of three-fifths of the Members of each

10 House of the Congress duly chosen and sworn.

11 Ω2æPage 11, after line 2, insert:

12 SEC. 10. LIMITATION ON ELIGIBILITY FOR EMERGENCY UN13 EMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION.

14 Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the

15 amendments made by sections 2 and 8 of this Act shall not

16 apply to any individual whose taxable income (as defined

17 in section 63 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986) for any

18 taxable year ending in 1992 exceeds $120,000.

Attest:

Secretary.
Exhibit-32.1 -- Certification per Sarbanes-Oxley Act (Section 906)

 

I am the Chief Executive and Financial Officer of AcroBoo,Inc., a Nevada corporation (the "Company"). I am delivering this certificate in connection with the amended Form10-Q/A of the Company for the quarter ended June 30, 2011 and filed with the U. S. Securities and Exchange Commission("Form 10-Q/A").

 

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I hereby certify that, to the best of my knowledge, the Form 10-Q/A fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in theForm 10-Q/A fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 

Dated: September 8, 2011

 

/s/ Dan Furlong

Dan Furlong

Principal Executive Officer

Principal Financial Officer
Exhibit 32

Section 1350 Certifications  Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002  (Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code)

Pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), each of the
undersigned officers of Credit Suisse First Boston (USA), Inc. (the "Company") does hereby certify, to such officer's knowledge, that:



|March 30, 2004 |  | /s/BRIAN D. FINN  
|-------------- |  | ------------------
|               |  | Name:             
|               |  | Title:            
|March 30, 2004 |  | /s/DAVID C. FISHER
|               |  | Name:             
|               |  | Title:            

---

QuickLinks
**Exhibit 31.1**

** **

**CERTIFICATION**

 

I, Colin Marshall, certify that:

 

1.             Ihave reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Cloud Peak Energy ResourcesLLC;

 

2.             Basedon my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statementsmade, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3.             Basedon my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;

 

4.             Theregistrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

 

a.             designedsuch disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

 

b.             *Reserved.*

 

c.             evaluatedthe effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

 

d.             disclosedin this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter(the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) thathas materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

 

5.             Theregistrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

 

a.             allsignificant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and

 

b.             anyfraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.

 

Dated: November 10, 2010

 
|   |   | /s/ Colin Marshall      |
|--------|--------|-------------------------|
|   |   | Colin Marshall          |
|   |   | Chief Executive Officer |

 

----
*

 Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be

published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 01-40233

Summary Calendar

 

BROWN FREIGHT SYSTEMS, INC.,

 Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

TEXACO, INC.,

 Defendant-Appellee.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. B-99-CV-120

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

October 17, 2001

Before DAVIS, BENAVIDES and STEWART, Circuit Judges:

PER CURIAM:*

Brown Freight Systems, Inc., (BFS), appeals from the district court’s decision granting

summary judgment to Texaco, Inc., in BFS’s discrimination claim brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. §

1981. Although BFS established that it was a minority-owned business, it failed to establish a prima

facie case of discrimination because there was no genuine issue of materialfact whether the company

was qualified for an available contract with Texaco. See LaPierre v. Benson Nissan, Inc., 86 F.3d

444, 448 (5th Cir. 1996). Accordingly, the district court did not err in granting Texaco summary

judgment on BFS’s § 1981 claim, and the court’s decision is AFFIRMED. See McDonnell-Douglas

Corp. v. Green, 411 U.S. 792, 801-02 (1973).
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit ______________________ 

VALEANT INTERNATIONAL BERMUDA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v.

ACTAVIS, INC., WATSON LABORATORIES, INC. - 

FLORIDA, AND ACTAVIS PHARMA, INC.,

Defendants-Appellants.

______________________ 

2012-1117, -1307

______________________ 

Appeals from the United States District Court for the 

Southern District of Florida in No. 10-CV-20526.

______________________ 

JUDGMENT

______________________ 

THERESA M. GILLIS, Mayer Brown LLP, of New York, 

New York, argued for plaintiff-appellee. With her on the 

brief were JOHN J. MOLENDA. Of counsel on the brief were

THOMAS W. JENKINS and ERICK J. PALMER, of Chicago, 

Illinois. 

JEFFREY J. TONEY, Kasowitz, Benson Torres & Friedman LLP, of Atlanta, Georgia, argued for defendantsappellants. With him on the brief were JONATHAN K.

WALDROP and DARCEY L. JONES. Of counsel on the brief 
 

was NORMAN E.B. MINNEAR, of New York, New York. Of 

counsel was PARKER C. ANKRUM, of Redwood, California. 

______________________ 

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED: 

 PER CURIAM (DYK, O’MALLEY, and WALLACH, Circuit 

Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

 ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

October 16, 2013 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole

 Date Daniel E. O’Toole

 Clerk
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

                   CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

    As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the incorporation by
reference in this Registration Statement of our report dated April 25, 2000
included in Peregrine Systems, Inc. Form 10-K for the year ended March 31, 2000
and our reports dated March 17, 2000 and February 27, 1998 on Telco Research
Corporation Limited and Telco Research Corporation included in Peregrine
Systems, Inc. Form 8-K/A dated May 22, 2000 and to all references to our Firm
included in this Registration Statement.

                                          /s/ ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP

San Diego, California
September 7, 2000