alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-09-00652-CR

John Bender, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, 331ST JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NO. D-1-DC-08-904109, HONORABLE CHARLES E. MILLER JR., JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

PER CURIAM

Appellant’s appointed counsel has filed a motion to withdraw. In her motion, counsel

states that appellant is an attorney, but not currently licensed to practice. She says that “[s]ince the

inception of this appeal, [she] has been in a struggle with the Appellant over who is the appellate

lawyer in this case.” She states that instead of the brief that she has been preparing, appellant wants

her to file a brief that he has written but that counsel is unwilling to sign. Counsel states that she and

appellant agree that she should withdraw to allow appellant to pursue the appeal himself. Attached

to the motion is a letter from appellant confirming his desire to represent himself.

The motion is granted in part. The appeal is abated and the cause is remanded to the

district court. Upon remand, the court shall promptly conduct a hearing at which appellant shall be

admonished of the disadvantages of self-representation and evidence shall be developed as to
whether appellant’s decision to relinquish the benefits of counsel is knowinglyand voluntarilymade. 

If appellant persists in his request to dismiss counsel, the district court shall allow counsel to

withdraw from the case and make available to appellant a copy of the appellate record. Appellant

will have thirty days from the date of the hearing to file a pro se brief.

A supplemental record, including the reporter’s record of the hearing and copies of

all orders entered by the district court, shall be filed with the Clerk by October 25, 2010.

Before Chief Justice Jones, Justices Puryear and Pemberton

Abated

Filed: September 10, 2010

Do Not Publish

2
Exhibit 10b


                                   MINUTES of a Meeting of the
                                   Compensation Committee of
                                   DETECTION SYSTEMS, INC.,
                                   held at the offices of
                                   Detection Systems, Inc.,
                                   Fairport, New York on the
                                   4th day of June, 1996.



     A discussion was held concerning possible changes in
officer compensation.  Then, upon motion duly made, seconded,
and unanimously approved, it was:

     RESOLVED:  That effective June 4, 1996, officers'
     compensation and benefits through May 30, 1997 will be as
     follows:

          Medical expenses.  That reimbursement of all personal
          and family medical expenses not covered by Company
          insurance plans, up to 10% of base salary, shall be
          granted to the Company's officers.
Exhibit 32.2



Certification Pursuant to

U.S.C. Section 1350,

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Devcon International Corp. (the
Company) on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Stephen J. Ruzika, President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                     |  |                                             
|-------------------- |  | --------------------------------------------
|Date: April 15, 2005 |  | /s/ Stephen J. Ruzika                       
|                     |  | Stephen J. Ruzika                           
|                     |  | President                                   
|                     |  | (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
This site uses Cascading Style Sheets to present information. Therefore, it may not display properly when
        disabled.


USA Population(depicts US population)


World Population(depicts World population)


Population estimates as of April 11, 2024(date data was received)
An official website of the United States government                

----

end of header

Census.govNewsroomReleasesMiscellaneous

# Newsroom Archive

Skip left menu navigation                          - About the Newsroom
                          - Facts for Features
                          - **News Releases**
                          - Press Kits
                          - Tip Sheets

### Release Information

**CB12-TPS.87**
**Contact:**  Public Information Office301-763-3030

## FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:  MONDAY, DEC. 10, 2012

## Follow Our Economy Using the Census Bureau's Mobile App

Check out the Census Bureau’s mobile app, “America’s Economy” for several key Census Bureau economic indicators this week: Quarterly Financial Report - Manufacturing, Mining, Wholesale Trade, and Selected Service Industries for the third quarter of 2012 (Dec. 10); U.S. International Trade in Goods and Services for October 2012 (Dec. 11); Monthly Wholesale Trade: Sales and Inventories for October 2012 (Dec.11); Advance Monthly Sales for Retail and Food Services for November 2012 (Dec. 13); and Manufacturing and Trade - Inventories and Sales for October 2012 (Dec. 13). Get the news on the go as it is released through “America’s Economy,” the Census Bureau’s free, easy-to-use mobile app, available for download for both Apple and Android phones and tablets. The app provides real-time updates for 16 key economic indicators from the Census Bureau, Bureau of Labor Statistics and Bureau of Economic Analysis.  <https://www.census.gov/mobile/>.

**No news release associated with this product. Tip Sheet only.**

CONNECT WITH US**********

                            - Information Quality
                            - Data Linkage Infrastructure
                            - Data Protection and Privacy Policy
                            - Accessibility
                            - FOIA
                            - Inspector General
                            - No FEAR Act
                            - U.S. Department of Commerce
                            - USA.gov

----

Measuring America's People, Places, and Economy

Is this page helpful?
YesNo

NO THANKS

255 characters maximum255 characters maximum reached

Thank you for your feedback.Comments or suggestions? 

PIO@census.gov
FW: E.O. 12866 Meeting on EGU MACT Rule Higgins, Cortney to: RobertJ Wayland, Bill Maxwell, Karen Thundiyil
11/15/2011 09:16 AM

Hi all, Consistent with our EOs, attached are the handouts from the 11/10 meeting on the EGU MACT rule. We will post these, along with the list of attendees, on our website shortly.

Regards,
Cortney

-----Original Appointment----- From: Echols, Mabel E. Subject: E.O. 12866 Meeting on EGU MACT Rule When: Thursday, November 10, 2011 11:30 AM-12:00 PM (UTC-05:00) Eastern Time (US & Canada). Where: Room 9104 New Executive Office Building

Randall Gerard, Podesta Group has requested this meeting.

2060AP52_2011_11_10_Podesta_Handout1.pdf

2060AP52_2011_11_10_Podesta_Handout2.pdf
Opinion issued September 3 , 2020

In The 

## Court of Appeals For The 

## First District of Texas

———————————— NO. 01
- 20
- 00393
- CV

——————————— IN RE OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS , Relat or

Original Proceeding on Petition for Writ of Mandamus

MEMORANDUM OPINION Relator, the Office of the Attorney General of Texas, filed a petition for writ of mandamus to compel the trial court to vacate its order staying the denial of real party in interest, C.J.P.’s, renewal of his vehicle registration. 1 On June 15, 2020, the Attorney General filed a motion to dismiss the petition. Real party in interest filed

1 The underlying case is In the Interest of __, Minor Child , cause number 7219*RH99 , pending in the 300th District Court of Brazoria County, Texas, the Honorable Patrick Bulanek presiding.2

a response asserting that the petition should be denied because the issues within the petition are untimely and unripe and because the Attorney G eneral has failed to exhaust all remedies. Real party in interest also agrees that the petition is moot because the Attorney General issued a notice of release of denial of vehicle registration and attached a copy of this notice. Because both parties agre e that the issues in this proceeding are moot and the petition should be dismissed, the Court grants the motion. We dismiss the petition. All pending motions are dismissed as moot. PER CURIAM Panel consists of Justices Kelly, Goodman, and Countiss

.
EXHIBIT 32.2





CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER





PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)





In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2018 (the “Report”) of New Mountain Finance Corporation (the “Registrant”), as filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Shiraz Y. Kajee, the Chief Financial Officer of the Registrant, hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge, that:





|    |                                                                                                                                  
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

|    |                                                                                                                                                        
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.




/s/ SHIRAZ Y. KAJEEName:Shiraz Y. KajeeDate:May 7, 2018
<PAGE>

              CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

The Board of Directors and Stockholders
Donaldson, Lufkin & Jenrette Inc.:


We consent to incorporation by reference in registration statements, No.
333-65681, on Form S-8, No. 333-53499, on Form S-3, No. 333-73405, on Form S-3,
and No. 333-74549, on Form S-3, of our report dated February 2, 1999, except as
to footnote 19, which is as of March 17, 1999, relating to the consolidated
statements of financial condition of Donaldson, Lufkin & Jenrette Inc. and
subsidiares as of December 31, 1998 and 1997 and the related consolidated
statements of income, changes in stockholders' equity and cash flows for each
of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 1998, and the related
financial schedule, which report appears in the December 31, 1998, annual
report on Form 10-K of Donaldson, Lufkin & Jenrette Inc.





/s/ KPMG LLP
------------------
New York, New York
March 30, 1999
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-6540

FRANKIE L. BATTLE, Plaintiff - Appellant,
versusVIVIAN REYNOLDS, individually and in her official capacity as jailhouse chief supervisor officer of Marion County jailhouse in the city of Marion County within the state of South Carolina; HOWARD GELESPY; KENNY DAVIS; THOMAS S. PAYNE, III; DOCTOR DERWELL; DOCTOR BECK; DOCTOR BLANTON; SAMUEL J. FRIEDMAN; J. NURSE; MARION COUNTY, individually and in their official capacity as a municipal corporation organized under and pursuant to the laws of the state of South Carolina; MARION COUNTY,Jailhouse Supervisors in the offices or commissioner, individually and in their official capacity as the local governing entity policymaker of South Carolina and in their supervisory roles for the county of Marion, South Carolina, Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Charleston. Henry M. Herlong, Jr., District Judge. (CA-94-2254-20-AJ) Submitted: August 22, 1996 Decided: September 5, 1996 Before RUSSELL, HALL, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.2 Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Frankie L. Battle, Appellant Pro Se. L. Hunter Limbaugh, WILLCOX, MCLEOD, BUYCK, BAKER & WILLIAMS, P.A., Florence, South Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).3 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the district court's order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint. Appellant's case was referred to a magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) (1988). The magistrate judge recommended that relief be denied and advisedAppellant that failure to file timely objections to this recommendation could waive appellate review of a district court order based upon the recommendation. Despite this warning, Appellant failed to object to the magistrate judge's recommendation. The timely filing of objections to a magistrate judge's recommendation is necessary to preserve appellate review of the substance of that recommendation when the parties have been warned that failure to object will waive appellate review. Wright v. Collins , 766 F.2d 841, 845-46 (4th Cir. 1985). See generally Thomas v. Arn , 474 U.S. 140 (1985). Appellant has waived appellate review by failing to file objections after receiving proper notice. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF BLUE WAVE SYSTEMS INC. AS OF SEPTEMBER 30, 1999 AND FOR
THE THREE MONTHS THEN ENDED, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                           1,688
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    6,990
<ALLOWANCES>                                       157
<INVENTORY>                                      6,528
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                15,769
<PP&E>                                          10,261
<DEPRECIATION>                                   7,095
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  20,123
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            7,612
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           149
<OTHER-SE>                                      10,590
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    20,123
<SALES>                                          7,391
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 7,391
<CGS>                                            3,358
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    3,358
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 3,703
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  52
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    300
<INCOME-TAX>                                        28
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                272
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       272
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .02
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .02



</TABLE>
Certification Pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

As Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Firsthand
Technology Value Fund, Inc. (the “Company”) for the quarter ended June 30, 2018, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), Kevin Landis and Omar Billawala, as Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, respectively, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to §
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of their knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|Date: August 9, 2018    | 
|----------------------- | 
|                        | 
|                        | 
|Kevin Landis            | 
|Chief Executive Officer | 
|                        | 
|                        | 
|Omar Billawala          | 
|Chief Financial Officer |
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D22-1274

_____________________________

HARRIS WALKER,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Gadsden County.

Robert R. Wheeler, Judge.

September 28, 2022

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

LEWIS, MAKAR, and BILBREY, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________
2

Harris Walker, pro se, Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General; David Welch and Julian E. 

Markham, Assistant Attorneys General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3496 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3496

   To amend title 18, United States Code, to increase penalties for 
                 certain arson and explosives offenses.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           November 10, 1993

 Mr. Hoyer (for himself and Mr. Weldon) introduced the following bill; 
          which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend title 18, United States Code, to increase penalties for 
                 certain arson and explosives offenses.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled, That section 844 of 
title 18, United States Code, is amended--
            (1) in each of subsections (f) and (i)--
                    (A) by striking ``not more than ten years'' and 
                inserting ``not less than 5 nor more than 20 years'';
                    (B) by striking ``not more than twenty years'' and 
                inserting ``not less than 10 nor more than 40 years'';
                    (C) by striking ``or fined not more than $10,000, 
                or both'' and inserting ``and shall be subject to a 
                fine under this title'';
                    (D) by striking ``or fined not more than $20,000, 
                or both'' and inserting ``and shall be subject to a 
                fine under this title''; and
                    (E) by inserting ``not less than 20'' after ``any 
                term of years''; and
            (2) in subsection (h)--
                    (A) by striking ``five years'' and inserting ``10 
                years''; and
                    (B) by striking ``ten years'' and inserting ``20 
                years''.

                                 <all>
```
254 La. 799

#### STATE of Louisiana v. Phillip BORDELON.

No. 50164.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Oct. 14, 1969.

In re: Phillip Bordelon applying for writs of certiorari (review), prohibition, mandamus and for a stay order.

The application is denied. There is no error in the ruling complained of.
#### STATE of Louisiana ex rel. Joseph GRAY, Jr. v. C. Murray HENDERSON, Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary, et al.

No. 54150.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Dec. 19, 1973.

In re: Joseph Gray, Jr. applying for writs of mandamus and habeas corpus.

Writ denied. The trial judge having, by his return, stated that the application below was denied on November 14, 1973, this application to mandamus him to act is now moot.

BARHAM, J.,

concurs. This is another occasion where this jurisdiction (24th Judicial District Court) has failed to act on a writ application for an unduly length of time contrary to positive law. The' delay here was six months. This Court should not countenance this procedure.