alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### J. B. UPTON and Virginia L. Upton, his wife, Appellants, v. STATE of Florida DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, Appellee.

No. Q-76.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Dec. 19, 1972.

*471Robert D. Canada, of Henderson, Richardson, Canada, Henry, Buchanan & Mun-roe, Tallahassee, for appellants.

Geoffrey B. Dobson and Barbara Ann McPherson, Tallahassee, for appellee.

JOHNSON, Judge.

This is an appeal from a final judgment, pursuant to a jury verdict, in a condemnation action and from order denying one item of costs.

It is revealed from the record on appeal that the appellants’ farm, through and over which a right of way was being condemned, consisted of approximately 1040 acres. About 85 acres was being taken in the right of way; also 216 acres of the farm would be severed from the rest of the farm by the right of way, and access to the 216 acres would be at least impaired. The State’s only witness as to value of the land taken, including severance damage to remainder, testified that in his opinion the highest and best use of the property was agricultural and fixed the value, including severance, at $48,565.00. This witness admitted that he had not taken into account any subsurface mineral in fixing his value.

The appellants, defendants below, produced as their first witness a retired farmer, who was familiar with farming of the nature operated by the defendants, and that he knew about the operation cost, normal expected returns, as well as what he thought the loss of business damage would be by taking the right of way, as well as practical loss of the 216 acres, and assessed it at $100,000.00. The State did not rebut this testimony but relied solely on its appraiser’s testimony.

The next witness for the defendants testified that he had examined the subsurface and made numerous core subsoil examinations and found a large deposit of dolomitic limestone and calcitic limestone with an estimated value of $680,000.00.

The appellants’ assignments of error numbered 1, 3, 4, 5 and 7, covered in appellants’ brief as point one, include the question of business damage. The appellants had submitted testimony as to business damages, unrebutted, and the jury ignored that item of damage in arriving at its verdict. This was error. The trial court had previously ruled that farming was a business, and therefore, it is our opinion that, even though the trial court was correct in not granting a directed verdict on this item of damage, the jury was in error in ignoring this item and the trial court was in error in not rejecting the jury verdict as being not in accordance with law.

Also error was made when the costs of the mining engineers were not admitted. The thought of the landowner in using the subsurface material in a commercial inan-ner was not so far removed as a profitable operation that the defendants’ costs incurred therein should have been allowed.

These reasons, verdict, judgment and order on costs, are reversed and the cause remanded for a new trial.

SPECTOR, C. J., and CARROLL, DONALD K., J., concur.
#### Patricia J. HORNEY, Appellant, v. Albert L. HORNEY, Appellee.

No. 73-959.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Oct. 26, 1973.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Orange County; Parker Lee McDonald, Judge.

Appeal dismissed.
# C_2014236EN.01000502.xml

| 22.7.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 236/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.7.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 236/5

---

Commission communication pursuant to Article 17 of Regulation (EC) No 1008/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council on common rules for the operation of air services in the Community

Invitation to tender in respect of the operation of scheduled air services in accordance with public service obligations

(Text with EEA relevance)

2014/C 236/06

| Member State | Ireland |
| --- | --- |
| Concerned routes | Kerry–Dublin
  Donegal–Dublin |
| Period of validity of the contract | 1 February 2015-31 January 2017 with possible 1 year extension following satisfactory review after 18 months of initial contract |
| Deadline for the submission of tenders | 2 months after the date of publication of this tender invitation |
| Address where the text of the invitation to tender and/or documentation related to the public tender and the public service obligations can be obtained free of charge | Department of Transport, Tourism and Sport |
| 44 Kildare Street |
| Dublin 2 |
| IRELAND |
| Airports Division |
| Tel. +353 16041299 / +353 16041616 |
| Fax +353 16041681 |
| E-mail: Airportsdivision@dttas.ie |

Member State

Ireland

Concerned routes

Kerry–Dublin

Donegal–Dublin

Period of validity of the contract

1 February 2015-31 January 2017 with possible 1 year extension following satisfactory review after 18 months of initial contract

Deadline for the submission of tenders

2 months after the date of publication of this tender invitation

Address where the text of the invitation to tender and/or documentation related to the public tender and the public service obligations can be obtained free of charge

Department of Transport, Tourism and Sport

44 Kildare Street

Dublin 2

IRELAND

Airports Division

Tel. +353 16041299 / +353 16041616

Fax +353 16041681

E-mail: Airportsdivision@dttas.ie

---
EXHIBIT 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of The Dixie Group, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the year ended December 26, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Jon A. Faulkner, the Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:



(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



/s/JON A. FAULKNER

Jon A. Faulkner, Chief Financial Officer
Date:  March 3, 2010



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to The Dixie Group, Inc. and will be retained by The Dixie Group, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### CURTIS, INC., Appellant, v. Robert C. JOHNSON, Appellee.

No. 71-228.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Nov. 3, 1971.

Rehearing Denied Dec. 2, 1971.

Gregory A. Presnell, of Akerman, Senter-fitt, Eidson & Wharton, Orlando, for appellant.

No appearance for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Upon examination of the briefs and record on appeal submitted in this cause (oral argument having been waived), this court can find no abuse of discretion in the order appealed from. We, therefore,

Affirm.

WALDEN and CROSS, JJ., and AG-NER, ROYCE, Associate Judge, concur.
| 1.     | Such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended December 31, 2010, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                |
|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                      |
| 2.     | The information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended December 31, 2010, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Tianyu Steel Inc. |

| By:                | /s/ Yoel Neeman                   |
|--------------------|-----------------------------------|
|     | Yoel NeemanPresident and Director |
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Charlene Mary SAIA.

No. 53155.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Jan. 23, 1973.

In re: Charlene Mary Saia applying for writs of certiorari, prohibition, mandamus and stay order.

Writ denied. Applicant has an adequate remedy of review if the event of conviction.
05/06/2013 10:01 9072765291 

### HOZUBIN&MOBERLY PAGE 02

tAW OFFICEOf 

### HOZUBIN &MOBERLY 310l SlRI'LT,SUI11:403 ANUiORAGE,AJ<9,51ll

Ta:('J()1) Z76-5Z91 FAx: (1107) 27l;-5291 -**~-** t :·!

..

## n:r\.;T

# r;**~** 

### U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION-:**:~~.;..t_:;-+/ Tif'''**  

### OFFICE OF HEARINGS ·'**-r~~l',--:·,~l;! ~..;._:,·._.,** 



### In the Matter of:
TGI FREIGHT WASHINGTON, DC 

### .c i U."'f:1 f.:-\i .l.,:.**-~~.)**
l . ! ' 

### --:> II. \; lJ i <.,...f f • ._: I } } 

### )FAA Docket No. CP10NM0012 )DMS NO. FAA-2010-1079

_______________________________)Judge RICHARD C. GOODWIN


### NON-OPPOSED MOTION TO EXTEND DEADLINE
COMES NOW TGI FREIGHT, by and through its counsel of record, the Law Office of Hozubin & Moberly, and hereby requests a one-week extension in which to file its Post-Hearing Brief, currently due May 6, 2013. The undersigned is out of state on other matters and requests a one-week extension to May 13, 2013. The undersigned certifies that counsel for the FAA does not oppose this request. DATED this 6th 

### day of May, 2013. LAW OFFICE OF HOZUBIN & 

### MOBERLY Attorneys for TGI Freight

# By:~~**~ebecca J~**  

## 1'- Alaska Bar No. 980601605/05/2013 10:01 9072755291 

### HOZUBIN&MOBERLY PAGE 03

LAWOfflCEOF HOZUBIN &MOBERLY JlO I(S'I'RUT,StJITE40S ANOj'ORACE,AK**99~01**

TU: (90'1) 276--5297 FAX: (907)**276~2n** 

### ORDER TGI Freight's request for a one-week extension is 

### GRANTED. Its Post-Hearing Brief is due by 

### May 13, 2013.


### DATED this day 

### of May, 2013.

Honorable Richard 

# c. Goodwin 

# u.s. Administrative Law Judge

Non-Opposed Motion for Extension of Time In the Matter of TGI Freiqht Docket No. CP10NM0012 Page 205/06/2013 10:01 9072765291 

### HDZUBIN&MDBERLY

LAW OI'FICE Of' 

### HOZUBIN &MOBERLY a\11J< S'OUZT,SVIm40(1 ANOIORAG!i,AK**99~01**

'l'£,l.! (907) 276-5291 f'AX: {007) ;!ti;.S291 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that on the**~** day of May 2013 1 a true and correct copy of the foregoing was served on the following:**Ori~inal** Plus 1 Copy-VIA**Faosimil~** Federal Aviation Administration 800 Independence Avenue, 

## s.w. Washington, 

### DC 20591 Attn: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2Wl000 (202) 493-5142

- fax 1 Copy=VIA Facsimile The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin, Adm1nistrative Law Judge 

### U.S. Department of Transportation Office of Hearings, M-20 1200 New Jersey Avenue, 

### S.E. 

### East Building, Ground Floor, Room E12-320 Washington, DC 20590 (202) 366-7536

- fax One Copy-VIA**Faosimil~** Howard L. Martin, Jr. Regional Counsel, Office of Regional Counsel,**AAL~7** Alaska Region Federal Aviation Administration 222 West 7tn Avenue #14 Anchorage, AK 99513-7587 On& Copy=VIA Facsimile Cheryl M. Jones, Sr. Attorney Office of Regional Counsel Alaska Region Federal Aviation Administration 222 West 7th Avenue #14 Anchorage, AK 99513-7587 LAW & MOBERLY

9l00/942/pleact/Non-Opp re Extension

Non-Opposed Motion for Extens1on of Time In the Matter of TGI Freiqht Docket No. CP10NM0012 Page 3 

### PAGE 04
# States S1501
#### Ponciano Rene RODRIGUEZ, Appellant, v. STATE FARM MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellee.

No. 71-480.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Nov. 16, 1971.

Samuel Benson, Miami, and Judith A. Brechner, Miami Beach, for appellant.

Carey, Dwyer, Austin, Cole & Selwood, and Steven R. Berger, Miami, for appellee.

Before PEARSON, HENDRY and BARKDULL, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See: United Contractors, Inc. v. United Construction Corp., Fla.App.1966, 187 So.2d 695; McInnis v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Ins. Co., Fla.App.1968, 208 So.2d 481; Kaplan v. Phoenix of Hartford Insurance Co., Fla.App.1968, 215 So.2d 893.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                           7,097
<SECURITIES>                                     7,010    
<RECEIVABLES>                                    5,024
<ALLOWANCES>                                       469
<INVENTORY>                                      6,722
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                26,090
<PP&E>                                          17,177
<DEPRECIATION>                                   8,848
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  35,055
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            9,020
<BONDS>                                          2,033
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            88
<OTHER-SE>                                      23,914
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    24,002
<SALES>                                          7,687
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 8,001
<CGS>                                            4,810
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    4,810
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 3,389
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  62
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (111)
<INCOME-TAX>                                      (14)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               (97)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (97)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.01)
        

</TABLE>
### -APARTMEN TO F :-.-KE i OPERATION S iOi l MA T3 1 A;i : 3 1 Augusl26 , 201 0 Ms . Susa nKurkin d Assisian l Sccrctnry io r

Aviatio n an dInternationa l Aftair s U.S . Deparlnien t

o f Transportatio n 40 0 7'^St..SV V Washinaion , D.C . 2059 0 Dea r Ms . Kurland : 1 a mwritin g i

n suppoi i o f

th e for t Wayne-Alle n County Airport Authority' s applicatio n fo r th e Smal l Communit y Ai r

Servic e Developmen t

Progra m(Docke t

OS'r-2010-0124} . Th e Authorit y i s takin g anove l Eiji

duniqu e approac htowar dencouragin g competitiv e activit y an dcos t reductio n amon g passenge r ai r servic e provider s a

t th e For t Wayn e Internationa l Aiipor t (FWA) . Pleas e giv e thi s applicatio never y possibl e consideration . Th e geograph y o f th e Foi l Wayn e marke t present s adifficul t

challeng e fo

r passenge r

servic e developmen t

a t FWA. W e are surrounde dby larg e hu b airport s tha t provid e direc t

servic e t o anumbe r

o f destination s a s wel l a s medium-size dairport s tha t hav e th e advantag e o f

greate r competitio n that

help s t o kee p ticke t price s lowe r

i n thei r markets . Traditionall y airport s hav e sough t t o brin g i n low-cos t

carrier s o r

sel l thei r passenge r

servic e provider s o n additiona l destinations . Botho f thes e tactic s hav e met

wit hlimite dsucces s i

n thi s market . A s th e airlin e industry continue s t o consolidate , th e opportunitie s t o '"sell " th e airline s o n expandin g thei r

ai r servic e t o smalle r

airport s ar c increasingl y difficult . Th e .Authority' s solutio n t o thi s proble mi s uniqu e an di s acredi t t o thei r focu s o n developin g appropriat e marke t researc han didentifyin g creativ e application s fo r th e air servic e developmen t

challenge . I woul dlike t o expres s m y stron g suppor t

fo r thi s applicatio n an dagai n urg e yo u t o giv e i t every possibl e consideration , 'i'han k you .

Michae l A . Banancfe

BURT , BLFF , DIXON . SUTTO N& BLOOM , LL P 20 0 Bas t Mai nStreet . Suit e 100 0 Fort Wayne , I

N4680 2
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23b



                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS



We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statement on Form S-8 (No. 333-09679) and the Registration Statements on Form
S-3 (No. 33-63875, No. 333-10517 and No. 333-17517) of Veritas DGC Inc., on our
report dated September 20, 1996 appearing on page 18 of Veritas DGC Inc.'s
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended July 31, 1997.


PRICE WATERHOUSE
Chartered Accountants

October 14, 1997
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                             603
<SECURITIES>                                    29,570
<RECEIVABLES>                                   15,286
<ALLOWANCES>                                       335
<INVENTORY>                                      7,359
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                54,111
<PP&E>                                           5,349
<DEPRECIATION>                                   2,805
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  59,620
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           11,467
<BONDS>                                            180
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            17
<OTHER-SE>                                      47,731
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    59,620
<SALES>                                         10,772
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                10,772
<CGS>                                            5,810
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    5,810
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 8,538
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (3,335)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (3,335)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (3,335)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (0.193)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (0.193)


</TABLE>
#### In re ESTATE of Jacob H. HOTOPP, Deceased.

No. 39364.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Feb. 1970.

Mandamus denied without opinion.
#### Robert A. SCHROETER, Sr., Appellant, v. Robert A. SCHROETER, Jr., et al., Appellees.

No. 73-1070.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Dec. 27, 1973.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Orange County.

Appeal dismissed.
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3236 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3236

To amend title 23, United States Code, to authorize a State to include 
  in highway construction contracts a guaranty or warranty clause for 
                       materials and workmanship.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 7, 1993

Mr. Beilenson introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
              Committee on Public Works and Transportation

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend title 23, United States Code, to authorize a State to include 
  in highway construction contracts a guaranty or warranty clause for 
                       materials and workmanship.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. GUARANTY AND WARRANTY CLAUSES.

    Section 114 of title 23, United States Code, is amended by adding 
at the end the following:
    ``(c) Guaranty and Warranty Clauses.--A State highway department 
may, in accordance with standards developed by the Secretary, include a 
clause in a contract for the construction of a Federal-aid highway 
which requires the contractor to guarantee or warrant materials and 
workmanship. Any such clause shall apply to a specific construction 
product or feature and may not provide for routine maintenance.''.

                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 USC, SECTION
1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002





In connection with
the Quarterly Report of InterCore Energy, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2012, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on or about the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Frederick Larcombe,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:



(1)      The Report fully complies with
the requirements of Sections 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)      Information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|Dated:  August 20, 2012 |     |                        
|----------------------- | --- | -----------------------
|                        |     | /s/ Frederick Larcombe 
|                        | By: | Frederick Larcombe     
|                        |     | Chief Financial Officer



A signed original of this written statement
required by Section 906 has been provided to InterCore Energy, Inc. and will be retained by InterCore Energy, Inc. and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
**Exhibit 23****CONSENT OF INDEPENDNET REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-3(Nos. 333-04947, 333-25717, 333-46357, 333-51588, 333-62599, 333-122221, 333-125040, 333-128862 and333-138102) and Form S-8 (File Nos. 333-32579, 333-66041, 333-69869, 333-102662, 333-126228 and333-126230) of FelCor Lodging Trust Incorporated of our reports dated March 1, 2007, relating tothe financial statements, financial statement schedule, management’s assessment of theeffectiveness of internal control over financial reporting and the effectiveness of internalcontrol over financial reporting, which appears in this Form 10-K./s/PricewaterhouseCoopers LLPDallas, Texas
### Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h Marilyn Kell y Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathawa y Mary Beth Kell y Brian K. Zahra,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk October 24, 2011

d1017 

# Order

October 24, 2011

143501

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 143501 COA: 303889 Wayne CC: 10-002606-FH MICHAEL GAINOUS, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appe al the June 10, 2011 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.