alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# CA2013204EN.01000301.xml

| 18.7.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CA 204/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.7.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CA 204/3

---

Corrigendum to the reserve list of competition EPSO/AD/235/12 — Croatian-language (HR) Lawyer-linguists (AD7)

(
  Official Journal of the European Union C 182 A of 27 June 2013
  )

(
  Official Journal of the European Union C 182 A of 27 June 2013

(2013/C 204 A/03)

On page 1:

for:

| ‘BIŽAJIĆ | Robert’, |
| --- | --- |

‘BIŽAJIĆ

Robert’,

read:

| ‘BIJAŽIĆ | Robert’. |
| --- | --- |

‘BIJAŽIĆ

Robert’.

---
# C_2017316EN.01029001.xml

| 22.9.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 316/290 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.9.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 316/290

---

P8_TA(2015)0303

Protocol amending the Marrakesh agreement establishing the World Trade Organization (consent) ***

European Parliament legislative resolution of 9 September 2015 on the draft Council decision on the conclusion, on behalf of the European Union, of the Protocol Amending the Marrakesh Agreement Establishing the World Trade Organization (06040/2015 — C8-0077/2015 — 2015/0029(NLE))

(Consent)

(2017/C 316/41)

The European Parliament,

The European Parliament

| — | having regard to the draft Council decision (06040/2015), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the draft Council decision (06040/2015),

| — | having regard to the draft Protocol Amending the Marrakesh Agreement Establishing the World Trade Organization (06041/2015), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the draft Protocol Amending the Marrakesh Agreement Establishing the World Trade Organization (06041/2015),

| — | having regard to the request for consent submitted by the Council in accordance with Article 207(4) and Article 218(6), second subparagraph, point (a) (v), of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (C8-0077/2015), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the request for consent submitted by the Council in accordance with Article 207(4) and Article 218(6), second subparagraph, point (a) (v), of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (C8-0077/2015),

| — | having regard to its non-legislative resolution of 9 September 2015 (1) on the draft decision, |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to its non-legislative resolution of 9 September 2015 (1) on the draft decision,

1

| — | having regard to Rule 99(1), first and third subparagraphs, Rule 99(2), and Rule 108(7) of its Rules of Procedure, |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to Rule 99(1), first and third subparagraphs, Rule 99(2), and Rule 108(7) of its Rules of Procedure,

| — | having regard to the recommendation of the Committee on International Trade and the opinion of the Committee on Development (A8-0237/2015), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the recommendation of the Committee on International Trade and the opinion of the Committee on Development (A8-0237/2015),

| 1. | Gives its consent to conclusion of the Protocol; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Gives its consent to conclusion of the Protocol;

| 2. | Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council, the Commission and the governments and parliaments of the Member States and to the World Trade Organization. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council, the Commission and the governments and parliaments of the Member States and to the World Trade Organization.

---

(1)  Texts adopted of that date, P8_TA(2015)0304.

1

---
I

I

I

STATE OF LOUISIANA

COURT OF APPEAL, F111IRST CIRCUIT

STATE OF LOUISIANA

VERSUS

NO. 2023 KW 0170

THEODORE SMITH

In Re: Theodore

Judicial

220022. 

Smith, applying

District Court, 

MARCH 27, 2023

for supervisory

Parish of St. 

I

writs, 

Tammany, 

22nd

No. 

BEFORE: GUIDRY, C.J., WOLFE AND MILLER, JJ. 

I

WRIT DENIED ON THE SHOWING MADE. ', Relator failed to include

the application for postconviction relief, the state's answer, 

I

if any, the trial court's ruling and any other portions of the

district court record that might support the claims raised in

the application for postconviction relief. Supplementation of

this writ application and/ or an application for rehearing will

not be considered. See Uniform Rules of Louisiana Courts of

Appeal, Rules 2-18. 7 & 4-9. Any future filing on this issue

should include the entire contents o'if this application, the

missing items noted above, and a copy o~ this ruling. 

COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT

DEPUTY CLERK OF COURT

FOR THE COURT

JMG

EW

SMM
#### Ethel M. O’BYRNE, Appellant, v. KARKIM, INC., a Florida corporation, Appellee.

No. 67-60.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Second District.

Nov. 8, 1967.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
# C_2013031EN.01000801.xml

| 2.2.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 31/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.2.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 31/8

---

Interest rate applied by the European Central Bank to its main refinancing operations (1):

1

0,75 % on 1 February 2013

Euro exchange rates (2)

2

1 February 2013

2013/C 31/05

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,3644 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 125,78 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4602 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,86170 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 8,6022 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,2351 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 7,4275 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 25,638 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 292,37 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,7003 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,1792 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,3750 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,3936 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,3132 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,3637 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 10,5847 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,6191 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,6934 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 493,94 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 12,2120 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 8,4965 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,5915 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 13 251,54 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,2452 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 55,502 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 40,9094 |
| THB | Thai baht | 40,659 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 2,7089 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 17,3704 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 72,5830 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,3644

JPY

Japanese yen

125,78

DKK

Danish krone

7,4602

GBP

Pound sterling

0,86170

SEK

Swedish krona

8,6022

CHF

Swiss franc

1,2351

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

7,4275

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

25,638

HUF

Hungarian forint

292,37

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,7003

PLN

Polish zloty

4,1792

RON

Romanian leu

4,3750

TRY

Turkish lira

2,3936

AUD

Australian dollar

1,3132

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,3637

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

10,5847

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,6191

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,6934

KRW

South Korean won

1 493,94

ZAR

South African rand

12,2120

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

8,4965

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,5915

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

13 251,54

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,2452

PHP

Philippine peso

55,502

RUB

Russian rouble

40,9094

THB

Thai baht

40,659

BRL

Brazilian real

2,7089

MXN

Mexican peso

17,3704

INR

Indian rupee

72,5830

---

(1)  Rate applied to the most recent operation carried out before the indicated day. In the case of a variable rate tender, the interest rate is the marginal rate.

1

(2)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

2

Source:

---
#### Martha CONNORS, Petitioner, v. SPRING GARDEN APARTMENTS et al., Respondents.

No. 43773.

Supreme Court of Florida.

July 12, 1973.

Certiorari denied.

ROBERTS, Acting C. J., and ERVIN, ADKINS, BOYD and McCAIN, JJ., concur.
# C_2013196EN.01000102.xml

| 9.7.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 196/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.7.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 196/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.6897 — Shell/Repsol (major part of LNG business))

(Text with EEA relevance)

2013/C 196/02

On 2 July 2013, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32013M6897. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32013M6897. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.

---
Name (Last, First, Middle) Title Company/

Organization

Street Address Phone Email

Webinar Attendees: Distribution Transformers Preliminary Analysis Public Meeting

City State/ Fax

Prov

Zip Country

Meeting Date: Tuesday, April 5, 2011

Engineer SCE 6042 N. Irwindale neha.arora@sce.com

Avenue

Arora, Neha Irwindale CA 91702 USA

Product Manager Arkansas Electric 

Cooperatives, Inc.

Baldwin, Travis 1 Cooperative Way Little Rock AR 72219 USA 501.570.2388 travis.baldwin@aeci.com

Carlson, Todd Director - Quality ERMCO PO Box 1228 Dyersburg TN 38305 USA 731-288-2472 tcarlson@ermco-eci.com

Staff Engineer Cooper Power Systems jerry.corkran@cooperindustries.c

om

Corkran, Jerry 1900 East North Street Waukesha WI 53188 USA 262-524-4355

Coulter, Greg Engineering Consultant Transformers 4052 Riviera Drive Salisbury NC 28144 USA 704-962-1009 N/A greg.coulter405@gmail.com

DeRouen, Craig Director of Engineering ERMCO 2125 Industrial Road Dyersburg TN 38024 USA 731-288-4338 cderouen@ermco-eci.com

Senior VP Engineering 

Services

American Public Power 

Association

1875 Connecticut mhyland@appanet.org

Avenue, NW

Hyland, Michael Washington DC 20009 USA 202-467-2986

NRDC 40 W. 20th Street 212-727-4637 kkennedy@nrdc.org

or 718-230-

1958

Kennedy, Katherine Brooklyn NY 11215 USA

Project Manager II Energy Solutions 1610 Harrison Street 510-482- bkundu@energy-solution.com

4420
x 261

Kundu, Bijit Oakland CA 94612 USA 510-482-4421

Petrosino, Thomas Consultant Prolec GE / TRP Consulting 1917 Park Road Charlotte NC 28203 USA 704-904-5509 tpetrosino@carolina.rr.com

Siqueiros, Carlos Engineering Manager Eaton Corp 4100 Rio Bravo El Paso TX 79924 USA 915-401-8302 carlossiqueiros@eaton.com

Director

Sustainable Electrical 

Energy

Copper Development 

Association

455 Massacheusetts zstrong@cda.copper.org

Ave, NW

202-558-

7625
212-

251-7238

Strong, Zolaikha Washington DC 20001 USA 202-380-9085

Owner Dave Weigand - Transformer 

Engineering Services

811-1985 Richmond dweigand@sympatico.com

Street

Weigand, Dave London ON N5X 0A6 CAN 519-663-5432

Wilks, Alan CEO Wilks Consulting 1049 Valley Road Dyersburg TN 38024 USA 731-285-2450 awilks@ieee.org

Sr. Electrical Designer Hammond Power Solutions, 

Inc.

wwong@hammondpowersolution

s.com

Wong, Watson USA 519-822-2441 N/A

Young, Daniel Project Manager Energy Solutions 1610 Harrison Street Oakland CA 94612 USA dyoung@energy-solution.com

Contacts Included: 16 Docket Id: EERE-2010-BT-STD-0048

05/05/2011 16:48:20 Page 1 of 1
#### Tommy APLIN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. T-23.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Dec. 4, 1973.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED DE CEMBER 6, 2019

NO. 03

- 19

- 00731

- CV

Sergio Alderete, Jr., Appellant

v.

The Attorney General of Texas, Appellee

APPEAL FROM COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 4 OF WILLIAMSON COUNTY

BEFORE JUSTICES GOODWIN, BA KER, AND KELLY

DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION

-- OPINION BY JUSTICE GOODWIN

Having reviewed the record

, it appears that the C ourt lacks jurisdiction over the appeal

.

The refore, the C ourt dismisses the appeal for want of jurisdiction

. Because appellant ’ s notice of

a ppeal was filed with the trial court and expressly requested a hearing in the trial court from the

order sig ned by the asso ciate judge , n o ad judication of cost s is made.
250 La. 535

#### Raymond BROWN et al. v. B & G CRANE SERVICE, INC., and/or Sun Erection Co., Inc., et al.

No. 48637.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 14, 1967.

In re: Great American Insurance Company applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, Parish of Orleans. 194 So.2d 746.

Writ refused. On the factual finding of the Court of Appeal, there is no error of law in its judgment.
#### John J. McCLAIN, III, Petitioner, v. The STATE of Florida, Respondent.

No. 38175.

Supreme Court of Florida.

March 12, 1969.

Jack J. Taffer and Mosca & Barone, Miami, for petitioner.

Earl Faircloth, Atty. Gen., for respondent.

PER CURIAM:

An extension of time was granteed to petitioner at the time the petition for cer-tiorari was filed in this cause to file his *4supporting record and brief. Neither has been filed.

The Court sua sponte has examined the petition and finds it to be frivolous and patently filed solely for delay. It is, therefore, dismissed with prejudice. The Clerk of this Court shall forthwith advise the Clerk of the District Court and Trial Court of this order.

No petition for re-hearing will be entertained.

It is so ordered.

DREW, Acting C. J., THORNAL, CARLTON, ADKINS and BOYD, JJ., concur.
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 3189

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow a charitable contribution deduction for certain expenses incurred by whaling captains in

support of Native Alaskan subsistence whaling.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

SEPTEMBER 29, 1993

Mr. YOUNG of Alaska introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Ways and Means

A BILL

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow a

charitable contribution deduction for certain expenses incurred by whaling captains in support of Native Alaskan

subsistence whaling.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. CHARITABLE CONTRIBUTION DEDUCTION FOR

4 CERTAIN EXPENSES INCURRED IN SUPPORT

5 OF NATIVE ALASKAN SUBSISTENCE WHAL6 ING.

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 170 of the Internal Reve8 nue Code of 1986 (relating to charitable, etc., contribu-
2

•HR 3189 IH

1 tions and gifts) is amended by redesignating subsection

2 (m) as subsection (n) and by inserting after subsection

3 (l) the following new subsection:

4 ‘‘(m) EXPENSES PAID BY CERTAIN WHALING CAP5 TAINS IN SUPPORT OF NATIVE ALASKAN SUBSISTENCE

6 WHALING.—

7 ‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—In the case of an individual

8 who is recognized by the Alaska Eskimo Whaling

9 Commission as a whaling captain charged with the

10 responsibility of maintaining and carrying out sanc11 tioned whaling activities and who engages in such

12 activities during the taxable year, the amount de13 scribed in paragraph (2) (to the extent such amount

14 does not exceed $7,500 for the taxable year) shall be

15 treated for purposes of this section as a charitable

16 contribution.

17 ‘‘(2) AMOUNT DESCRIBED.—The amount de18 scribed in this paragraph is the aggregate of the rea19 sonable and necessary whaling expenses paid by the

20 taxpayer during the taxable year in carrying out

21 sanctioned whaling activities. For purposes of the

22 preceding sentence, the term ‘whaling expenses’ in23 cludes expenses for—

24 ‘‘(A) the acquisition and maintenance of

25 boats, weapons, and gear used in the hunt,
3

•HR 3189 IH

1 ‘‘(B) the supplying of food for the crew

2 and other provisions for carrying out sanctioned

3 whaling activities, and

4 ‘‘(C) storage and distribution of the catch

5 from such activities.

6 ‘‘(3) SANCTIONED WHALING ACTIVITIES.—For

7 purposes of this subsection, the term ‘sanctioned

8 whaling activities’ means subsistence bowhead whale

9 hunting activities conducted pursuant to the man10 agement plan of the Alaska Eskimo Whaling Com11 mission.’’

12 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by

13 subsection (a) shall apply to all taxable years beginning

14 before, on, or after the date of the enactment of this Act.

Æ
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Freddie Leroy BURTON.

No. 54296.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Feb. 1, 1974.

In re: Freddie Leroy Burton, applying for writ of certiorari.

Writ denied. Evidentiary hearing established that applicant violated conditions of his probation and that probation was properly revoked under La.C.Cr.P. Art. 900(4).
Exhibit 23.1

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The Board of Directors

Devcon International Corp and Subsidiaries:

We consent to the incorporation
by reference in the registration statements listed below of Devcon International Corp. and Subsidiaries of our report dated April 16, 2007, with respect to the consolidated balance sheet of Devcon International Corp. and Subsidiaries as of December
31, 2006, and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders equity and comprehensive (loss) income, and cash flows for the year ended December 31, 2006, which report appears in the December 31, 2006 annual report on Form
10-K of Devcon International Corp. and Subsidiaries.



| |  |  | Forms S-8 (Registration No. 333-113853, No. 33-59557 and No. 333-92231)
| | - |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | Forms S-3 and S-3/A (Registration No. 333-119158 and No. 33-65235)
| | - |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------

/s/ Berenfeld, Spritzer, Shechter & Sheer LLP

Certified Public Accountants

Fort Lauderdale, Florida

April 16, 2007
<PAGE>   1




                                                                   EXHIBIT 23-11


INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

We consent to the incorporation by reference of our report dated January 26,
1998 appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of DTE Energy Company and The
Detroit Edison Company for the year ended December 31, 1997 in the following
registration statements:


      FORM                                        REGISTRATION NUMBER

      DTE ENERGY COMPANY
      Form S-3                                    33-57545
      Form S-8                                    333-00023

      THE DETROIT EDISON COMPANY
      Form S-3                                    33-53207
      Form S-3                                    33-64296




DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

Detroit, Michigan
February 23, 1998
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 162 (Tuesday, August 21, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Pages 42281-42282]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-18003]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. OR18-32-000]


Notice of Petition for Declaratory Order; Cactus II Pipeline LLC

    Take notice that on August 9, 2018, pursuant to Rule 207(a)(2) of 
the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission's (Commission) Rules of 
Practice and Procedure, 18 CFR 385.207(a)(2) (2017), Cactus II Pipeline 
LLC (Cactus II Pipeline or Petitioner), filed a petition for a 
declaratory order to approve the specified rate structure, terms of 
service, and open season procedures for its proposed Cactus II Pipeline 
Project, which will transport crude oil from various West Texas 
Counties in the Permian Basin to Corpus Christi, Texas, all as more 
fully explained in the petition.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest this filing must 
file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of 
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211, 385.214). Protests will be 
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to 
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a notice of 
intervention or motion to intervene, as appropriate. Such notices, 
motions, or protests must be filed on or before the comment date. 
Anyone filing a motion to intervene or protest must serve a copy of 
that document on the Petitioner.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and 
interventions in lieu of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at http://www.ferc.gov. Persons unable to file electronically should submit an 
original and 5 copies of the protest or intervention to the Federal 
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE, Washington, DC 
20426.
    This filing is accessible on-line at http://www.ferc.gov, using the 
``eLibrary'' link and is available for review in the Commission's 
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an ``eSubscription'' 
link on the website that enables subscribers to receive email 
notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For 
assistance with any FERC Online service, please email 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#31777463727e5f5d585f54624441415e434571575443521f565e47"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="b3f5f6e1f0fcdddfdaddd6e0c6c3c3dcc1c7f3d5d6c1d09dd4dcc5">[email protected]</span></a>, or call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For 
TTY, call (202) 502-8659.
    Comment Date: 5:00 p.m. Eastern time on September 7, 2018.


[[Page 42282]]


    Dated: August 14, 2018..
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2018-18003 Filed 8-20-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Stephen J. Markman

, Chief Justice

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Kurtis T. Wilder

Elizabeth T. Clement

, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

September 12, 2018

d0905 

# Order

Clerk September 12, 2018

156400

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 156400

COA: 337265

St. Clair CC: 08

- 001351

- FC

DONALD ROBERT BURKE,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the July 7, 2017 order of

the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, b ecause we are not persuaded that

the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.