alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.1


                           CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a)
and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), each
of the undersigned officers of INNOVATIVE PRODUCTS OPPORTUNITIES INC.,
a Delaware corporation (the "Company"), does hereby certify, to such
officer's knowledge, that:

The quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2011(the
"Form 10-Q") of the Company fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the
information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




/s/  Doug Clark
----------------------------------------
By:  Doug Clark
Chief  Executive  Officer


/s/ Robert MacLean
----------------------------------------
By: Robert MacLean
Chief Financial and Accounting Officer

May 5, 2011

<PAGE>
#### John G. FUZZARD and Virginia M. Fuzzard, his wife, Appellants, v. John A. SALT and Irma G. Salt, his wife, et al., Appellees.

No. 70-416.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Dec. 15, 1970.

Rehearing Denied Jan. 13, 1971.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
254 La. 790

#### Ena Marie CHAUVIN v. UNITED STATES FIDELITY AND GUARANTY COMPANY et al.

No. 50007.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Oct. 14, 1969.

In re: United States Fidelity and Guaranty Company and Howard Reed d/b/a Dairy Queen No. 1 applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, Parish of Lafayette. 223 So.2d 441.

The application is denied. According to the facts of this case as found to be by the Court of Appeal, there appears no error of law in the judgment complained of.

BARHAM, J., is of the opinion the writ should be granted. Under the facts found by the Court of Appeal and plaintiffs own testimony, plaintiff is guilty of contributory negligence as a matter of law. The holding of the Court of Appeal under these facts makes the owner of public premises an insurer of those who use the premises and is contrary to our law.
Order entered July 11, 2022

In The 

### Court of Appeals **Fifth District of Texas at Dallas**

No. 05

- 22

- 00139

- CR

KEPHREN MARCUS THOMAS , Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

On Appeal from the 283rd Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. F 20

- 36078

- T

O RDER

Before the Court is court reporter Sharina Fowler ’ s July 7, 2022 request for

additional time to file the reporter ’ s record. We GRANT the request and ORDER

the reporter ’ s record due by August 8, 2022

.

/s/ ROBERT D. BURNS, III CHIEF JUSTICE
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3341 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3341

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

             November 3 (legislative day, November 2), 1993

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Veterans' Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
To amend title 38, United States Code, to increase the rate of special 
pension payable to persons who have received the Congressional Medal of 
                                 Honor.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. INCREASE IN RATE OF SPECIAL PENSION FOR PERSONS ON THE MEDAL 
              OF HONOR ROLL.

    (a) In General.--Section 1562(a) of title 38, United States Code, 
is amended by striking ``$200'' and inserting ``$400''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) shall 
apply with respect to months beginning after the date of the enactment 
of this Act.

            Passed the House of Representatives November 2, 1993.

            Attest:

                                           DONNALD K. ANDERSON,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 335 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 335

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to repeal the luxury tax on 
                                 boats.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 5, 1993

   Mr. Roth introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to repeal the luxury tax on 
                                 boats.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REPEAL OF LUXURY TAX ON BOATS.

    (a) General Rule.--Subpart A of part I of subchapter A of chapter 
31 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to luxury taxes) is 
amended by striking section 4002 and by redesignating sections 4003 and 
4004 as sections 4002 and 4003, respectively.
    (b) Conforming Amendments.--
            (1) The table of sections for such subpart A is amended by 
        striking the last 3 items and inserting the following:

                              ``Sec. 4002. Aircraft.
                              ``Sec. 4003. Rules applicable to subpart 
                                        A.''
            (2) Subparagraph (B) of section 4003(b)(2) of such Code, as 
        redesignated by subsection (a), is amended by striking ``, 
        $100,000 in the case of a boat,''.
            (3) Paragraph (2) of section 4011(c) of such Code is 
        amended--
                    (A) by striking ``, boats,'' in the heading,
                    (B) by striking ``, boat,'' in subparagraph (A), 
                and
                    (C) by striking ``a boat or'' in subparagraph 
                (B)(i).
            (4) Sections 4221(c) and 4222(d) of such Code are each 
        amended by striking ``4002(b), 4003(c), 4004(a)'' and inserting 
        ``4002(c), 4003(a)''.
    (c) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall take 
effect on the date of the enactment of this Act.

                                 <all>
```
| 1.   | I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010 of QSGI INC. (the “Registrant”); |
|----------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2.   | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; |
|----------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 3.   | Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; |
|----------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 4.   | The Registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Registrant and have: |
|----------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 5.   | The Registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the Registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): |
|----------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date: February 15, 2012 |   | /s/ David Meynarez                                              |
|-------------------------|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------|
|                    |   | David MeynarezChief Financial Officer and Treasurer   |

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>      5
<LEGEND>       THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION
               EXTRACTED FROM LYNTON GROUP, INC.'S AUDITED ANNUAL
               REPORT FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1997
               AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
               SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>   1
       
<S>                          <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>            SEP-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>               OCT-1-1996
<PERIOD-END>                 SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                          726,645
<SECURITIES>                          0
<RECEIVABLES>                 4,513,695
<ALLOWANCES>                     22,196
<INVENTORY>                     803,677
<CURRENT-ASSETS>              6,235,945
<PP&E>                       18,045,935
<DEPRECIATION>                4,652,703
<TOTAL-ASSETS>               26,223,248
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>         7,287,302
<BONDS>                      13,459,832
<COMMON>                      1,918,462
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                 0
<PREFERRED>                           0
<OTHER-SE>                    2,605,398
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY> 26,223,248
<SALES>                      25,585,102
<TOTAL-REVENUES>             25,585,102
<CGS>                        19,229,033
<TOTAL-COSTS>                23,062,317
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                 77,347
<LOSS-PROVISION>                      0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>            1,161,549
<INCOME-PRETAX>               1,283,889
<INCOME-TAX>                    238,393
<INCOME-CONTINUING>           1,045,496
<DISCONTINUED>                        0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                  46,864
<CHANGES>                             0
<NET-INCOME>                  1,092,360
<EPS-PRIMARY>                      0.17
<EPS-DILUTED>                      0.17
        

</TABLE>
#### Edith R. PEREZ et al., Appellants, v. Ran M. COHEN et al., Appellees.

Nos. 77-350, 77-351.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Sept. 19, 1978.

Rehearing Denied Oct. 20, 1978.

Magill, Sevier & Reid and Victor H. Womack, Miami, for appellants.

John Carruthers, II, Jeanne Heyward, Miami, for appellees.

Before HENDRY, HUBBART and KE-HOE, JJ.

KEHOE, Judge.

Appellants, plaintiffs below, bring these consolidated appeals from orders dismissing their complaints for failure to prosecute and orders denying their motions to set aside the orders of default. We affirm.

It is undisputed by the parties that there was no record activity in the respective causes for a one year period. However, appellants contend that, pursuant to Florida Rule Civil Procedure 1.420(e), there was action “otherwise” in the causes, by their participating in another appeal related to these causes, which precluded the trial court from properly dismissing their complaints for failure to prosecute. We hold, as the trial court found, that this other activity was insufficient to avoid the imposition of the sanctions order by the trial court. Fla.R.Civ.P. 1.420(e). Accordingly, the orders appealed are affirmed.

Affirmed.
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 3391

To restore eligibility for burial in national cemeteries to unremarried surviving

spouses.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

OCTOBER 27, 1993

Mr. SANGMEISTER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Veterans’ Affairs

A BILL

To restore eligibility for burial in national cemeteries to

unremarried surviving spouses.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That section 2402(5) of title 38, United States Code, is

4 amended by inserting ‘‘(which for purposes of this chapter

5 includes an unremarried surviving spouse who had a sub6 sequent remarriage which was terminated by death or di7 vorce)’’ after ‘‘surviving spouse’’.

Æ
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
COMPANY'S CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AS OF JUNE 30, 2000 AND THE
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED JUNE
30, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-2001
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                          14,349
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   74,822
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (4,178)
<INVENTORY>                                    209,600
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               308,528
<PP&E>                                         146,837
<DEPRECIATION>                                (60,971)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 496,799
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          149,778
<BONDS>                                        337,864
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             1
<OTHER-SE>                                       4,364
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   496,799
<SALES>                                        130,093
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               130,093
<CGS>                                          104,618
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  104,618
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               8,762
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,719)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (752)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (967)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (967)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
1

Gurdoglanyan, Nicole

From: Jose Aviles [armytrucker36@gmail.com]

Sent: Friday, April 27, 2012 10:51 AM

To: GovernmentAffairs

Subject: Travel from DCA to SJU non stop

This is a great idea of having a non stop flight from Ronald Reagan to San Juan because it avoid more layovers 

and will reduce the travel time at least for 3hours, which it is important for me that I am military that each 

minutes are counted and appreciated. Please add this non flight schedule so it helps us to travel more frequently 

to our island to see family and friends. There is a lot of puertoricans serving in the military around the DC area 

that would like to see this happen. Thanks.
# C_2015149EN.01000101.xml

| 6.5.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 149/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.5.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 149/1

---

RECOMMENDATION OF THE EUROPEAN CENTRAL BANK

of 27 March 2015

to the Council of the European Union on the external auditors of the Deutsche Bundesbank

(ECB/2015/14)

(2015/C 149/01)

THE GOVERNING COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN CENTRAL BANK,

Having regard to the Statute of the European System of Central Banks and of the European Central Bank, and in particular Article 27.1 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | The accounts of the European Central Bank (ECB) and national central banks of the Member States whose currency is the euro are audited by independent external auditors recommended by the ECB’s Governing Council and approved by the Council of the European Union. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

The accounts of the European Central Bank (ECB) and national central banks of the Member States whose currency is the euro are audited by independent external auditors recommended by the ECB’s Governing Council and approved by the Council of the European Union.

| (2) | The mandate of the Deutsche Bundesbank’s current external auditors, Ernst & Young AG Wirtschaftsprüfungsgesellschaft Steuerberatungsgesellschaft, ended with the audit for the financial year 2014. It is therefore necessary to appoint external auditors from the financial year 2015. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

The mandate of the Deutsche Bundesbank’s current external auditors, Ernst & Young AG Wirtschaftsprüfungsgesellschaft Steuerberatungsgesellschaft, ended with the audit for the financial year 2014. It is therefore necessary to appoint external auditors from the financial year 2015.

| (3) | The Deutsche Bundesbank has selected KPMG AG Wirtschaftsprüfungsgesellschaft as its external auditors for the financial years 2015 to 2020, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

The Deutsche Bundesbank has selected KPMG AG Wirtschaftsprüfungsgesellschaft as its external auditors for the financial years 2015 to 2020,

HAS ADOPTED THIS RECOMMENDATION:

It is recommended that KPMG AG Wirtschaftsprüfungsgesellschaft should be appointed as the external auditors of the Deutsche Bundesbank for the financial years 2015 to 2020.

Done at Frankfurt am Main, 27 March 2015.

The President of the ECB

Mario DRAGHI

---
P u rsuan t t o 5 T H C IR . R. 47. 5, t h e courtha s det erm i n ed that t h i s opi n i on * shou l d n otbe pu bl i shed an d i s not preceden texcept u n der t h e l i m i t ed c i r c um s t anc e s s e tf

o r t h i n 5 T H C IR . R. 47. 5. 4. 

### INTHE UNI TED S TATESCOU RT OFAPPEALS

FORTHE FIFTH CIRCU IT

N o. 08- 41312 C onfer enc e Cal endar UN I TE D S TA TE S OF AM ERI CA, P l ai n t i f f
- A pp el l ee v. J OE T HO M AS T UCKER, D e fe nda nt - Appe l l ant

A pp ealf

rom t h e U n i t ed S t ates D i st ri ctC ou rt f ort he E as t er n D i st r i c tof Texas U S D C N o . 6 :91 -C R -3 0 -1 B ef ore W IE N E R , B E N AV ID E S , an d S T E W A R T , C i rcui tJu dg es. P E R C U R IA M: * A p p e al i n g t h e j u dg m en ti n a cr i m i n alcase, Joe T h om as T u cker r ai se s ar gum ent s t hatar e f or ec l os ed by Un itedS ta tes v. D o u b lin , 572 F. 3d 235, 2 3 6 -3 9 (5 th C ir . 2 0 0 9 ), pe t i t i o n f o rc e r t . f

i le d (S e p t . 2 1 , 2 0 0 9 ) (N o . 0 9 -6 6 5 7 ), w h i ch rejectedthe arg u m en t t h a t Un i t ed S t ate s v. B ooker , 543 U . S. 220 ( 2005) appl i es i n 18 U . S. C . § 3582(c ) ( 2) proc ee di ngs and hel d thata di st r i c tc our tm ay n otreduce a sentence bel ow t h e m i n i m u m provi ded i n t h e am en ded G u i del i n es. United States Court of App eals

Fifth Circuit 

### F I L E D October 20, 2009 Cha rl es R. F ulb ru g e II I ClerkN o. 08- 41312

2 The G o ve r nm e nt ’ s m o t i o n f o rs um m ar y af

f i rm an c e i s G RA N TE D , a nd the j u d g me n to f

t h e d i s t r i c tc o u r ti s A F F I RMED.
Exhibit 32.1
                                                                    ------------


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 *

         In connection with the Annual Report of WindsorTech, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Marc
Sherman, Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:


         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Act of 1934; and


         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.


Date: March 25, 2004                           /s/ MARC SHERMAN
                                               ----------------
                                                   Marc Sherman
                                                   Chairman of the Board and
                                                   Chief Executive Officer

* A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to WindsorTech, Inc. and will be
retained by WindsorTech, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.



                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 *

         In connection with the Annual Report of WindsorTech, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Edward
L. Cummings, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:


         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Act of 1934; and


         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.


Date: March 25, 2004                           /s/ EDWARD L. CUMMINGS
                                               ----------------------
                                                   Edward L. Cummings
                                                   Chief Financial Officer

* A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to WindsorTech, Inc. and will be
retained by WindsorTech, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.