alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 9
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                      25,029,586
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                460,281,597
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                     749,448,367
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                       757,781,734
<LOANS>                                     47,503,504
<ALLOWANCE>                                    100,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                           1,332,357,450
<DEPOSITS>                                 551,694,613
<SHORT-TERM>                               672,444,111
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                         12,308,082
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                       24,166,257
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        64,456
<OTHER-SE>                                  71,679,931
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>           1,332,357,450
<INTEREST-LOAN>                              1,910,559
<INTEREST-INVEST>                           48,283,937
<INTEREST-OTHER>                               946,609
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                            51,141,105
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                          13,868,308
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          31,998,055
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                       19,143,050
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                        0
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                              41,760
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                             60,280,132
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             15,153,739
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                  15,153,739
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 8,651,917
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.31
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.31
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    2.38
<LOANS-NON>                                          0
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                               100,000
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                        0
<RECOVERIES>                                         0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                              100,000
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                                 0
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                        100,000
        

</TABLE>
#### Levi Richard McCLENDON, Petitioner, v. Louie L. WAINWRIGHT, Director, Division of Corrections, Respondent.

No. 72-654.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

July 31, 1973.

Richard L. Jorandby, Public Defender, and Bruce J. Daniels, Asst. Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for petitioner.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Nelson E. Bailey, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for respondent.

OWEN, Chief Judge.

By habeas corpus we have granted petitioner delayed appellate review of an order entered May 5, 1972 denying his motion to vacate under Rule 3.850, RCrP, 33 F.S.A.

On June 8, 1970, without counsel present, petitioner pled guilty to the offense of aggravated assault. On February 17, 1971, he was adjudged guilty and sentenced. On July 22, 1971, petitioner filed his motion to vacate judgment and sentence alleging as ground for relief that he was without counsel at the time he pled guilty. The motion was denied by order of July 28, and on appeal therefrom, McClendon v. State, Fla. *704App.1972, 260 So.2d 255, we stated as follows :

> “The motion alleged as the ground for relief that defendant was without counsel at the time he pled guilty. This allegation standing alone is insufficient to show a right to relief under Rule 3.850 CrPR. On this basis only we affirm the appealed order. Rose v. State, Fla.App.1970, 235 So.2d 353.”

Petitioner then filed in the trial court on May 2, 1972, a further motion to vacate in which he alleged not only the fact that he was without counsel when he pled guilty, but also that at the time of entering the plea he was indigent, that he desired to have the aid of counsel, and that he had not waived his right to counsel. With these additional allegations, the motion was legally sufficient, if true, to entitle petitioner to relief. Lawson v. State, Fla.1970, 231 So.2d 205; Rose v. State, Fla.App.1970, 235 So.2d 353. Nonetheless, the court again denied the motion without evi-dentiary hearing. The order denying the motion (which is the order appealed) stated that the court would not consider this ground since it was the subject of a prior motion which had been denied and affirmed on appeal.

Our prior per curiam opinion (260 So.2d 255) affirming the order of July 28, 1971 simply held that the order correctly denied the motion because the allegations were legally insufficient. This did not foreclose consideration of a new motion to vacate on the same grounds where the necessary allegations have been added. Archer v. State, Fla.App.1964, 166 So.2d 163. Since the record does not conclusively show that such allegations are not true, an evidentiary hearing is required. The order is reversed and this cause remanded for further proceedings consistent herewith.

Reversed and remanded.

CROSS and MAGER, JJ., concur.
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 3317

To prohibit the United States representative to the United Nations from

voting to approve, expand, or extend any United Nations peacekeeping,

peacemaking, or peace-enforcing operation unless the President notifies

the Congress before that vote.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

OCTOBER 19, 1993

Mr. ROGERS introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Foreign Affairs

A BILL

To prohibit the United States representative to the United

Nations from voting to approve, expand, or extend any

United Nations peacekeeping, peacemaking, or peace-enforcing operation unless the President notifies the Congress before that vote.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 3317 IH

1 SECTION 1. CONGRESSIONAL NOTIFICATION REQUIRE2 MENT REGARDING UNITED NATIONS PEACE3 KEEPING, PEACEMAKING, AND PEACE-EN4 FORCING OPERATIONS.

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—The United States representative

6 to the United Nations shall not vote to approve, expand,

7 or extend any United Nations peacekeeping, peacemaking,

8 or peace-enforcing operation under Chapter VI or VII of

9 the Charter of the United Nations unless, at least 15 days

10 before such vote, the President notifies the appropriate

11 congressional committees of—

12 (1) the total estimated cost of the operation;

13 (2) the source of funding for the United States

14 contribution to the operation, such as whether such

15 funding will require—

16 (A) a budget request or an amendment to

17 an existing budget request;

18 (B) a reprogramming of existing funds; or

19 (C) a request for supplemental appropria20 tions;

21 (3) the anticipated duration and scope of the

22 operation;

23 (4) the anticipated termination date of the op24 eration;

25 (5) the goals of the operation; and
3

•HR 3317 IH

1 (6) the United States interests that will be

2 served by the operation.

3 (b) APPROPRIATE CONGRESSIONAL COMMITTEES

4 DEFINED.—For purposes of this section, the term ‘‘appro5 priate congressional committees’’ means the Committee on

6 Appropriations, the Committee on Armed Services, and

7 the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of Rep8 resentatives and the Committee on Appropriations, the

9 Committee on Armed Services, and the Committee on For10 eign Relations of the Senate.

Æ
#### GODSHALL v. HESSEN.

No. 39212.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Feb. 1970.

Rehearing Denied March 9, 1970.

Certiorari denied without opinion. 227 So.2d 506.
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 160 (Friday, August 17, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Pages 41140-41141]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-17756]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY


Meeting of the Regional Energy Resource Council

AGENCY: Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA).

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The TVA Regional Energy Resource Council (RERC) will hold a 
meeting on Wednesday, September 5, 2018, to discuss the scenarios and 
strategies that TVA has identified for the 2019 Integrated Resource 
Plan.
    The RERC was established to advise TVA on its energy resource 
activities and the priority to be placed among competing objectives and 
values. Notice of this meeting is given under the Federal Advisory 
Committee Act (FACA).

[[Page 41141]]


DATES: The public meeting will be held on Wednesday, September 5, 2018, 
from 10:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m., EDT.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at the Hilton Knoxville, 501 West 
Church Avenue, Knoxville, Tennessee 37902, and will be open to the 
public. Anyone needing special access or accommodations should let the 
contact below know at least a week in advance.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Barbie Perdue, 865-632-6113, 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#3e5c5f4e5b4c5a4b5b7e4a485f10595148"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="157774657067716070556163743b727a63">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The meeting agenda includes the following:

1. Introductions
2. Overview of the 2019 Integrated Resource Plan (IRP) and Supplemental 
Environmental Impact Statement status
3. Overview of the Scenarios and Strategies identified for the 2019 IRP
4. Public Comments
5. Council Discussion and Advice

    The RERC will hear opinions and views of citizens by providing a 
public comment session starting at 12:45 p.m., EDT, lasting up to one 
hour, on Wednesday, September 5, 2018. Persons wishing to speak are 
requested to register at the door between 11:00 a.m. and 12:00 p.m., 
EDT, on Wednesday, September 5, 2018, and will be called on during the 
public comment period. TVA will set time limits for providing oral 
comments, once registered. Handout materials should be limited to one 
printed page. Written comments are also invited and may be mailed to 
the Regional Energy Resource Council, Tennessee Valley Authority, 400 
West Summit Hill Drive, WT-9-D, Knoxville, Tennessee 37902.

    Dated: August 10, 2018.
Joseph J. Hoagland,
Vice President, Enterprise Relations and Innovation, Tennessee Valley 
Authority.
[FR Doc. 2018-17756 Filed 8-16-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 8120-08-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
EXHIBIT 31.1

 CERTIFICATION OF INTERIM PRESIDENT, PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL AND ACCOUNTING OFFICER
          PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 AND
                           ITEM 307 OF REGULATION S-K

I, David Pollock, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Form 10-KSB of Hydron Technologies, Inc. for the period
ended September 30, 2007;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business
issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the
small business issuer and have:

(a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the small business issuer, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c) disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business
issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's fourth fiscal
quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting; and

5. I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control
over financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit
committee of the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions):

(a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting.

/s/ David Pollock
-----------------
David Pollock
Chief Executive Officer, Principal Financial and Accounting Officer

December 28, 2007
262 La. 126

#### STATE of Louisiana ex rel. Garnett WATSON v. C. Murray HENDERSON, Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary.

No. 52506.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

May 30, 1972.

In re: Garnett Watson applying for remedial writs and writ of habeas corpus.

Writ granted. The plea of guilty waived non-jurisdictional defects in the indictment and prosecution prior thereto. Nevertheless, under the allegations, the petitioner is entitled to an evidentiary hearing as to the alleged involuntariness of the plea.

HAMLIN, J.,

dissents. The sentence was imposed prior to April 2, 1969. Cf. Halliday v. U. S., 394 U.S. 831, 89 S.Ct. 1498, 23 L.Ed.2d 16 (1969).

SUMMERS, J.,

dissents. See State v. Johnson, 260 La. 902, 257 So.2d 654 (1971) overruling State ex rel. Jackson v. Henderson, 260 La. 90, 255 So.2d 85 (1971).
# C_2013072EN.01000102.xml

| 12.3.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 72/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.3.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 72/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.6765 — Precision Castparts/Titanium Metals)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2013/C 72/02

On 19 December 2012, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32012M6765. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32012M6765. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.

---
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 23.5


                   CONSENT OF U.S. BANCORP PIPER JAFFRAY INC.


We hereby consent to the inclusion in the Registration Statement on Form S-4 of
iTurf Inc. ("iTurf") relating to the proposed merger of dELIA*s Inc. with and
into a wholly owned subsidiary of iTurf, of our opinion letter, dated as of
August 16, 2000, appearing as Annex C to the Joint Proxy Statement/Prospectus
which is a part of the Registration Statement, and to the references of our firm
name therein. In giving such consent, we do not thereby admit that we come
within the category of person whose consent is required under Section 7 or
Section 11 of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the rules and
regulations adopted by the Securities and Exchange Commission thereunder, nor do
we admit that we are experts with respect to any part of such Registration
Statement within the meaning of the term "experts" as used in the Securities Act
of 1933, as amended, or the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange
Commission thereunder.


Very truly yours,


By /s/ U.S. Bancorp Piper Jaffray Inc.
   -----------------------------------
   U.S. Bancorp Piper Jaffray Inc.


Minneapolis, Minnesota
August 25, 2000
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Securities and Exchange Commission

# FEDERAL REGISTER CITATION OF PREVIOUS ANNOUNCEMENT:

83 FR 38759, August 7, 2018.

# PREVIOUSLY ANNOUNCED TIME AND DATE OF THE MEETING:

Thursday, August 9, 2018 at 2:00 p.m.

# CHANGES IN THE MEETING:

The Closed Meeting scheduled for Thursday, August 9, 2018 at 2:00 p.m. has been changed to Thursday, August 9, 2018 at 1:00 p.m.

# CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION:

For further information and to ascertain what, if any, matters have been added, deleted or postponed, please contact the Office of the Secretary at (202) 551-5400.

Dated: August 7, 2018.

Brent J. Fields,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2018-17259 Filed 8-8-18; 11:15 am]

BILLING CODE 8011-01-P
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Teresa Medina, Also Known as Maria Gonzalez, Appellant.

[721 NYS2d 829]

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Cooperman, J.), rendered February 4, 1999, convicting her of attempted murder in the first degree, criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree, and criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

*564The Supreme Court properly ruled, after a *Sandoval*hearing *(see, People v Sandoval,*34 NY2d 371), that if the defendant took the stand, the prosecutor could question her about her four petit larceny convictions and their underlying facts *(see, People v Walker,*83 NY2d 455; *People v Branch,*155 AD2d 475; *People v Myrick,*128 AD2d 732), her use of aliases *(see, People v Walker, supra),*and her status as an illegal alien *(see, People v Caicedo,*173 AD2d 630; *People v Ortero,*75 AD2d 168).

The defendant’s sentence was neither harsh nor excessive *(see, People v Suitte,*90 AD2d 80).

The defendant’s remaining contention is without merit. Altman, J. P., McGinity, Luciano and H. Miller, JJ., concur.
mhtx_ex105.htm

EXHIBIT 10.5
 
Imagion Biosystems Inc., Irrevocable Proxy
 
	1.	Manhattan Scientifics, Inc., (“MSI”) the sole shareholder of Common Stock of Imagion Biosystems, Inc., a Nevada corporation (the “Company”), hereby grants to the Investors (the “Investors”) under the Note Purchase Agreement of even date herewith (the “NPA”), an irrevocable proxy as set forth below. This proxy is a condition of and an inducement to the Investors providing capital to the Company under the NPA.
	 
	 

	2.	The Acquirer grants to the Investors this as the Acquirer’s proxy to vote all shares of the Company held by MSI (the “Shares”) as the Investors deems appropriate in the best interest of the Corporation on all matters reasonably required to carry out the spinout plan described in the term sheet attached as an exhibit hereto.
	 
	 

	3.	This Irrevocable Proxy will terminate on the first to occur of: (a) the closing of the first sale of the Company’s Common Stock in a firm commitment, underwritten public offering on the Australian Stock Exchange, or (b) three years after the date hereof.
	 
	 

	4.	Those issues on which this Irrevocable Proxy shall be authorized to vote shall include any corporate event and all matters for which shareholders may vote.
	 
	 

	5.	The Company may accept a communication from any Investor concerning voting pursuant to this Irrevocable Proxy as representing a communication of all the Investors, and any Investor making such communication represents and warrants to the Company that such Investor has the right and authority to make such communication on behalf of all the Investors


 
Dated: 10 Nov. 2016
 
	 	IMAGION BIOSYSTEMS, INC., a Nevada corporation	
	 	 	 	 
		By:	/s/ Robert Proulx
	
	 
	Name: 
	Robert Proulx
	 
	 	Title:	Director
	 
	 	 	 	 
	 
	MANHATTAN SCIENTIFICS, INC., a Delaware corporation
	 

	 
	 
	 
	 

	 
	By: 
	/s/ Manny Tsoupanarias
	 

	 
	Name: 
	Manny Tsoupanarias
	 

	 
	Title: 
	CEO
No. 00-7344.

#### Lay *v.*Litscher.

C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.