alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.01   CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Quarterly Report of Mokita Ventures, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending August 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Irma N. Colón-Alonso, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.      /s/ Irma N. Colón-Alonso By: Irma N. Colón-Alonso Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer  Dated: October 24, 2011  A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**





**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**





**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**





SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of The Banker's Store, Inc. (the "Company")
      on Form 10- KSB for the fiscal year  ended May 31, 2007 as filed with
      the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
      Vincent C. Buckman, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
      certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
      the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that based on my knowledge:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.







*Dated:
                August 9, 2007**/s/
                Vincent C. Buckman**Vincent
                C. Buckman*President
                and Chief Executive Officer
No. 11351.

#### The Southeastern Ohio Railway, Light & Power Co. *v.*The Moxahala Park & Amusement Co.

Decided February 15, 1910.

Error to Circuit Court of Muskingum county.

*Mr. Edward R. Meyer,*for plaintiff in error.

*Mr. C. E. Swingle*and *Mr. F. H. Southard,*for defendant in error.

Judgment affirmed.

Crew, Spear and Shauck, JJ., concur.
Exhibit
10.22


 


 


February
5, 2013


 


David
M. Slager


Regals
Capital LP


152
West 57th Street


9th Floor


New
York, NY 10019


 


Dear
David:


 


This
letter is to confirm certain undertakings that Oramed Pharmaceuticals Inc. (the "Company") has made in connection
with your recent investment in the Company. The Company for ten years from October 26, 2012 on will not:


 


		1.	Grant
                                         stock options with an exercise price of less than $6.00 per share, as adjusted for stock
                                         splits and the like; or



 


		2.	Grant
                                         stock options to officers, directors, employees or consultants exercisable into more
                                         than 125,000 shares of common stock of the Company, in the aggregate per calendar year,
                                         without the consent of the top 3 non-founding shareholders (ie top 3 shareholders outside
                                         of Nadav Kidron and Dr. Miriam Kidron and other related parties).






 


Sincerely,


 


/s/
Nadav Kidron


 



Nadav
Kidron, CEO


 





Oramed
Pharmaceuticals, Inc.  |  2 Elza Street, Jerusalem, Israel 93706.  |  www.oramedpharma.com


Phone:
011 972-54-790 9058  |  Fax: 011 972-2-679 2336  |  Email: info@oramedpharma.com
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM ULTRATECH
STEPPER INC., FORM 10-Q AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                          37,557
<SECURITIES>                                    95,925
<RECEIVABLES>                                   13,388
<ALLOWANCES>                                       235
<INVENTORY>                                     30,294
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               182,134
<PP&E>                                          53,189
<DEPRECIATION>                                  31,195
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 222,416
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           54,385
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            21
<OTHER-SE>                                     167,748
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   222,416
<SALES>                                         55,292
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                63,428
<CGS>                                           35,578
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   41,732
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                13,158
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   600
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 142
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (10,845)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (10,845)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                     (18,883)
<NET-INCOME>                                  (29,728)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (1.40)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.40)


</TABLE>
Order entered June 19, 2015

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-15-00646-CV

ADT SECURITY SERVICES, INC., Appellant

V.

VAN PETERSON FINE JEWELERS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 191st Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 09-12111

ORDER

On June 3, 2015, we denied the unopposed motion of nonresident attorney Charles C. 

Eblen for pro hac vice admission without prejudice to filing a motion accompanied by a motion 

of the resident practicing Texas attorney with whom he shall be associated. On June 8, 2015, the 

Court received the motion of resident counsel in support of Mr. Eblen’s unopposed motion for 

pro hac vice admission. 

Accordingly, we VACATE our order dated June 3, 2015. We now GRANT the June 2, 

2015 unopposed motion for pro hac vice admission of nonresident attorney Charles C. Eblen. 

We DIRECT the Clerk of this Court to add Charles C. Eblen as counsel pro hac vice.

/s/ ELIZABETH LANG-MIERS 

JUSTICE
# C_2013298EN.01000101.xml

| 12.10.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 298/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.10.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 298/1

---

2013/C 298/01

Last publication of the Court of Justice of the European Union in the Official Journal of the European Union

Official Journal of the European Union

OJ C 291, 5.10.2013

OJ C 291, 5.10.2013

Past publications

Past publications

OJ C 284, 28.9.2013

OJ C 274, 21.9.2013

OJ C 260, 7.9.2013

OJ C 252, 31.8.2013

OJ C 245, 24.8.2013

OJ C 233, 10.8.2013

These texts are available on:

EUR-Lex: http://eur-lex.europa.eu

---
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY RESEARCH TRIANGLE PARK, NC 27711



## APR 2

## 3 2012 OFFICE OF AIR Q UALITY PLANNING AND STANDARDS MEMORANDUM SUBJECT:
FROM:

TO: Second Extension of Comment Period for 1Oth Conference on Air Quality Modeling 

# J£.

-Ov,' Q... ·, - · . • <:::::::> George M Bridgers, Model Clearinghouse Director 

### C!J'7)**'~** Air Quality Modeling Group , C439-01 Docket# : EPA-HQ-OAR-2012-0056
On April 2 , 2012 , an "Extension of Comment Period for 1Oth Conference on Air Quality Modeling" memorandum was posted on the 1Oth Conference on Air Quality Modeling (Modeling Conference) informational website and also in the official Docket (EPA-HQ-OAR20 12-0056) for the Conference. In this memorandum, the public comment period for the Conference was extended from April 16 to April 30 to allow additional time for commenters to assemble and provide their comments, recommendations , and feedback. When the April 2, 2012 memorandum was submitted to the Docket, it was anticipated that two model assessment and evaluation reports announced prior to the Modeling Conference would be available by early April for review and comment. There have been unforeseen delays that have prevented the delivery of these reports. It is now anticipated that these reports will be posted to Modeling Conference's informational website by no later than May 15 , 2012. In response to the delays of the two model assessment and evaluation reports and additional requests for further extension of the public comment period, we are extending the comment period again. With the submission of this second memorandum to the Docket, the comment period for the 1Oth Conference on Air Quality Modeling is herby extended to June 15 , 2012
. All comments should be submitted to the Docket by the close ofbusiness on June 15 and per the instructions that were provided in the original Federal Register publication. We apologize for any inconvenience that the two extensions ofthe comment period may ha ve caused. Ifthere are any questions regarding this comment period extension, please contact George Bridgers ofEPA's Air Quality Modeling Group at (919) 541-5563 or bridgers.george @ epa. gov.

Recycled/Recyclable • Printed wtth Vegetable Oil Based Inks on 1 00% Recy cled Paper (40% Postcon sumer )
Exhibit 32-53
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO  18 U. S. C. SECTION 1350  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 Date: February 23, 2010
    /S/ ANTHONY F. EARLEY, JR.Anthony F. Earley, Jr.Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of The Detroit Edison Company
Order entered February 13, 2015

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-14-01222-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF D.C. AND Q.C., CHILDREN

On Appeal from the 429th Judicial District Court

Collin County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 429-01053-2013

ORDER

The clerk’s and reporter’s records are past due. On January 12, 2015, we granted 

appellant an extension to February 23, 2015 to file the records. Before the Court is appellant’s 

February 11, 2015 second motion seeking a sixty-day extension of time to file the clerk’s record 

and reporter’s record. We GRANT the motion as follows:

We ORDER Andrea Stroh Thompson, Collin County District Clerk, to file, by MARCH 

16, 2015, either: (1) the clerk’s record; or (2) written verification that appellant has not paid or 

made arrangements to pay for the clerk’s record. We caution appellant that, if the Court receives 

written notification of no payment or payment arrangements, we will dismiss the appeal for want 

of prosecution without further notice. See TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3(b). 

We ORDER Shawn Gant, Official Court Reporter for the 429th Judicial District Court of 

Collin County, Texas, to file, by MARCH 23, 2015, either: (1) the reporter’s record; or (2) 

written verification that appellant has not paid or made arrangements to pay for the reporter’s 
record. We caution appellant that if the Court receives written verification of no payment or 

payment arrangements, the Court will order the appeal submitted without the reporter’s record. 

See TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3(c).

We DIRECT the Clerk of this Court to send a copy of this order by electronic 

transmission to Andrea Stroh Thompson, Shawn Gant, appellant, and counsel for appellee. 

/s/ ELIZABETH LANG-MIERS 

JUSTICE
#### STATE of Florida ex rel. Robert L. SHEVIN, Attorney General, Relator, v. William C. PIERCE, as Chief Judge, et al., Respondents.

No. 42611.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Nov. 22, 1972.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., and Charles Corees, Jr., Asst. Atty. Gen., for relator.

William J. Switalski, of Switalski & Lazzara, Tampa, for respondents.

*665PER CURIAM.

We here consider suggestion of the State for a writ of prohibition prohibiting the District Court of Appeal, Second District, from hearing the appeal of Lonnie E. Cox, Jr., from an order of the Circuit Court of Pinellas County, Florida, granting the State’s motion for reconsideration of a former order of said Circuit Court dismissing and forever discharging said Lonnie E. Cox, Jr. from prosecution under an information charging Cox with aggravated assault and kidnapping. Said former order was issued under the purported authority of Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, Rule 1.191(a)(1), known as the Speedy Trial Rule, 33 F.S.A.

Rule Nisi in Prohibition was issued. Respondents have advised no answer or return will be filed.

This matter being at issue, it is the opinion of this Court that the Circuit Court order granting reconsideration of the former order discharging Lonnie E. Cox, Jr. purportedly under the Speedy Trial Rule, is a nonappealable interlocutory order and that the District Court is without jurisdiction to consider it. See Article V, section 5(3), Constitution of Florida, F.S.A. See also State v. Smith, Fla.App.1971, 254 So.2d 402. That decision was approved by this Court in State v. Smith and Figgers, 260 So.2d 489. The sole provision promulgated by this Court for appellate review of pretrial orders in criminal cases is found in Rule 6.3, subd. b, Florida Appellate Rules, 32 F.S.A. which only allows appeal therefrom by the State.

Nothing herein is intended to preclude Lonnie E. Cox, Jr. from raising the question of the validity of the order of reconsideration re: application of the speedy trial rule in his cause in any appeal he takes from a final judgment therein.

The foregoing considered, peremptory writ is hereby issued directed to Respondents prohibiting them from taking jurisdiction of the appeal of Lonnie E. Cox from said order of reconsideration.

It is so ordered.

ROBERTS, C. J., and CARLTON, ADKINS and BOYD, JJ., concur.

ERVIN, J., dissents with opinion.

ERVIN, Justice.

I dissent. I see little reason why the District Court of Appeal under its supervisory jurisdiction could not consider the fundamental question of whether Lonnie E. Cox, Jr. was entitled to discharge under the speedy trial rule itnder the circumstances in this case. Having secured the original order of discharge, he was aggrieved by its reconsideration on the State’s motion. Even though technically an appeal does not lie, it would appear the notice of appeal could have been treated by the District Court as a petition for an extraordinary writ under its supervisory jurisdiction. See last paragraph of Article V, Section 5(3), State Constitution.
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3344 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 3344

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

            October 7 (legislative day, September 12), 1994

                                Received

            October 8 (legislative day, September 12), 1994

       Read twice and referred to the Committee on Armed Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
                   For the relief of Lloyd B. Gamble.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. APPROPRIATION OF FUNDS.

    (a) Payment.--The Secretary of the Treasury shall pay, out of any 
money in the Treasury not otherwise appropriated, to Lloyd B. Gamble of 
Fairfax, Virginia, the sum of $253,488.
    (b) Basis.--The payment required by subsection (a) shall be to 
compensate Lloyd B. Gamble for the injuries sustained by him as a 
result of the administration to him, without his knowledge, of lysergic 
acid diethylamide by United States Army personnel in 1957.

SEC. 2. SATISFACTION OF CLAIMS.

    The payment made pursuant to section 1 shall be in full 
satisfaction of all claims Lloyd B. Gamble may have against the United 
States for any injury described in such section.

SEC. 3. INELIGIBILITY FOR ADDITIONAL BENEFITS.

    Upon payment of the sum referred to in section 1, Lloyd B. Gamble 
shall not be eligible for any compensation or benefits from the 
Department of Veterans Affairs or the Department of Defense for any 
injury described in such section.

SEC. 4. LIMITATION OF AGENTS AND ATTORNEYS FEES.

    It shall be unlawful for an amount of more than 10 percent of the 
amount paid pursuant to section 1 to be paid to or received by any 
agent or attorney for any service rendered to Lloyd B. Gamble in 
connection with the benefits provided by this Act. Any person who 
violates this section shall be guilty of an infraction and shall be 
subject to a fine in the amount provided in title 18, United States 
Code.

            Passed the House of Representatives October 7, 1994.

            Attest:

                                           DONNALD K. ANDERSON,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
EXHIBIT 32





GLOBAL VISION HOLDINGS, INC.



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES -OXLEY ACT OF
2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Global Vision Holdings,
Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2013, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Glen W. Carnes the Principal Executive, Financial and Accounting Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 (including subsections (a) (b) and (c) thereof), as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------





Date: August 19, 2013



/s/ Glen W. Carnes








Glen W. Carnes

Principal Executive, Financial and Accounting
Officer









1
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

The undersigned officer of Courier Corporation (the “Company”)hereby certifies that the Company’s annual report on Form 10-K for theyear ended September 25, 2010 to which this certification is attached (the“Report”), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the datehereof, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, andthat the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| *November 24, 2010* | * * | By:                                              | *s/James F. Conway III* |
|--------------------------|----------|--------------------------------------------------|-------------------------|
| Date                     |     | James F. Conway III                              |
|                     |     | Chairman, President, and Chief Executive Officer |

 

 

This certification shall not be deemed “filed” for anypurpose, nor shall it be deemed to be incorporated by reference into anyfiling, under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of1934.

 

----
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 3108

To authorize the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to expand the scope of services

provided veterans in Vet Centers.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

SEPTEMBER 21, 1993

Mr. SMITH of New Jersey introduced the following bill; which was referred

to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs

A BILL

To authorize the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to expand

the scope of services provided veterans in Vet Centers.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SCOPE OF SERVICES PROVIDED IN VET CEN4 TERS.

5 (a) EXPANSION OF SERVICES.—Section 1712A of

6 title 38, United States Code, is amended—

7 (1) in subsection (a)(1) by inserting ‘‘and, to

8 the extent otherwise authorized by law, may furnish

9 such additional needed services as described in sub10 section (h)’’ in the first sentence after ‘‘life’’; and
2

•HR 3108 IH

1 (2) by adding at the end the following new sub2 section:

3 ‘‘(h) In operating centers under this section, the Sec4 retary may provide (1) preventive health care services, (2)

5 medical services reasonably necessary in preparation for

6 hospital admission, and (3) referral services to assist in

7 obtaining specialized care. The Secretary shall provide

8 such services through such health care personnel as the

9 Secretary determines appropriate.’’.

10 (b) REPORT.—Not later than one year after the date

11 of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall submit

12 to the Committees on Veterans’ Affairs of the Senate and

13 House of Representatives a report relating to the imple14 mentation of the amendments made by subsection (a). The

15 report shall include the following:

16 (1) The number of veterans provided services

17 described in section 1712A(h) of title 38, United

18 States Code, as added by subsection (a).

19 (2) The number of centers which provided serv20 ices described in that section.

21 (3) An assessment of the effect providing such

22 services has had on access to and timeliness of serv23 ice delivery.

Æ
#### WEST CALCASIEU PORT HARBOR AND TERMINAL DISTRICT v. CAJUN MARINE SERVICES, INC., and Alfred A. Devall, d/b/a Calcam Fleeting Service.

No. 60536.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Oct. 26, 1977.

In re: Alfred A. Devall d/b/a Calcam Fleeting Service and Devall’s Towing and Boat Service, Inc. applying for certiorari, or writ of review to the Court of Appeal, *1210Third Circuit, Parish of Calcasieu, 348 So.2d 169.

Denied.
#### Norman Henry DESPRES, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. N-299.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Oct. 1, 1970.

Louis O. Frost, Jr., Public Defender, and Gerald Sohn, Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.

Earl Faircloth, Atty. Gen., and J. Christian Meffert, Asst. Atty. Gen., for ap-pellee.

PER CURIAM.

The briefs and record on appeal having been read and given full consideration and *599appellant having failed to demonstrate reversible error, the judgment appealed is hereby affirmed.

JOHNSON, C. J., and SPECTOR and WIGGINTON, JJ., concur.