alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 31.1**

 

**CERTIFICATIONOF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

 

I, L. Michael Cutrer, certify that:

 

 1.    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Qof North American Scientific, Inc.;

 

 2.    Based on my knowledge, this report does not containany untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material factnecessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances underwhich such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;

 

 3.    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements,and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in allmaterial respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flowsof the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

 

 4.    The registrant’s other certifying officer and I areresponsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures(as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrantand have:

 

a)     Designed such disclosure controls and procedures,or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant,including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others withinthose entities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;

 

b)    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’sdisclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusionsabout the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of theend of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

 

c)     Disclosed in this report any changes in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarterin the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonablylikely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting; and

 

 5.    The registrant’s other certifying officer and Ihave disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control overfinancial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee ofregistrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):

 

a)     All significant deficiencies and materialweaknesses in the design or operation of internal controls over financialreporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

 

b)    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involvesmanagement or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting.

 
|  Date: September 21, 2004    |
|----------------------------------------|
|                                   |
| /s/  L. Michael Cutrer                 |   |
| L.  Michael Cutrer                     |
| President  and Chief Executive Officer |

 

----
# C_2014408EN.01004001.xml

| 15.11.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 408/40 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.11.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 408/40

---

RESEARCH EXECUTIVE AGENCY

Publication of the final accounts for the financial year 2013

2014/C 408/40

The complete version of the final accounts may be found at the following address:

http://ec.europa.eu/rea/index_en.htm

---
Certification Pursuant to
 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
 As Adopted Pursuant to
 Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
 
 In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Firsthand Technology Value Fund, Inc. (the “Company”) for the quarter ended June 30, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), Kevin Landis, as Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:
 
 (1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
  (2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 
 Date: August 8, 2011
 
 
 /s/ Kevin Landis
 Kevin Landis
 Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

                          Consent of Ernst & Young LLP

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form
S-3 No. 333-24135) pertaining to the Palm Harbor Homes, Inc. Employee Savings
Plan, and in the Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-52535) and in the
related Prospectus of Palm Harbor Homes, Inc. and subsidiaries, of our report
dated May 3, 2002, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of Palm
Harbor Homes, Inc. and subsidiaries included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K)
for the year ended March 29, 2002.





May 24, 2002
Dallas, Texas
262 La. 1

#### STATE of Louisiana v. Commodore JENKINS.

No. 52437.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

May 18, 1972.

Law Offices of W. T. McCain, Robert L. Kennedy, Colfax, for defendant-appellant.

William J. Guste, Jr., Atty. Gen., Harry H. Howard, Asst. Atty. Gen., Sam L. Wells, Dist. Atty., for plaintiff-appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The defendant juvenile was tried by the juvenile court and recommitted to the Louisiana Training Institute at Scotland-ville for an indefinite period of time. He appeals that judgment and recommitment to this Court.

We take cognizance, ex proprio motu, that this Court is without appellate jurisdiction of appeals by juveniles from the juvenile courts. La.Const. art. VII, sections 10, 29, 52; State v. Barrios, 254 La. 93, 222 So.2d 869 (1969).

It is ordered that this case be, and it is hereby, transferred to the Third Circuit Court of Appeal, La.R.S. 13:4441.
# C_2016310EN.01009101.xml

| 25.8.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 310/91 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.8.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 310/91

---

P8_TA(2015)0020

The accession of Gabon to the 1980 Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction *

European Parliament legislative resolution of 11 February 2015 on the proposal for a Council decision on the declaration of acceptance by the Member States, in the interest of the European Union, of the accession of Gabon to the 1980 Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction (COM(2011)0904 — C8-0263/2014 — 2011/0441(NLE))

(Consultation)

(2016/C 310/17)

The European Parliament,

The European Parliament

| — | having regard to the proposal for a Council decision (COM(2011)0904), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the proposal for a Council decision (COM(2011)0904),

| — | having regard to Article 38, fourth paragraph, of the 1980 Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction, |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to Article 38, fourth paragraph, of the 1980 Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction,

| — | having regard to Article 81(3) and Article 218(6), second subparagraph, point (b), of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament (C8-0263/2014), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to Article 81(3) and Article 218(6), second subparagraph, point (b), of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament (C8-0263/2014),

| — | having regard to the opinion of the Court of Justice of 14 October 2014, |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the opinion of the Court of Justice of 14 October 2014,

| — | having regard to Rules 59 and 108(7) of its Rules of Procedure, |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to Rules 59 and 108(7) of its Rules of Procedure,

| — | having regard to the report of the Committee on Legal Affairs (A8-0007/2015), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the report of the Committee on Legal Affairs (A8-0007/2015),

| 1. | Approves the proposal for a Council decision and approves the acceptance of the accession; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Approves the proposal for a Council decision and approves the acceptance of the accession;

| 2. | Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council, the Commission and the governments and parliaments of the Member States and of Gabon. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council, the Commission and the governments and parliaments of the Member States and of Gabon.

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                             907
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   10,488
<ALLOWANCES>                                    (3,523)
<INVENTORY>                                     10,386
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   367
<PP&E>                                           1,800
<DEPRECIATION>                                  (1,387)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  19,422
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                         22,368
<COMMON>                                         6,734
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                     (24,613)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    19,422
<SALES>                                          8,212
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 8,650
<CGS>                                            2,437
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    5,131
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 2,966
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                (1,706)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,781
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (1,227)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (1,227)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                    331
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (896)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     (.13)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (.13)



</TABLE>
#### Arthur MELANCON, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. REPUBLIC PETROLEUM CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 6836.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana. First Circuit.

Dec. 28, 1966.

Rehearing Denied Feb. 6, 1967.

Writ Refused March 27, 1967.

C. Ellis Henican, of Henican, James & Cleveland, Steeg & Shushan, New Orleans, Peltier & Peltier, Thibodaux, Sehrt, Boyle & Wheeler, New Orleans, for appellant.

Victor A. Sachse, of Breazeale, Sachse & Wilson, Paul M. Hebert, Baton Rouge, Johnny X. Allemand, Thibodaux, for ap-pellee.

Before LANDRY, ELLIS and BAILES, JJ. ' ' '

BAILES, Judge.

The issues in this case are identical to those in the consolidated case of Bollinger v. Republic Petroleum Corporation, this day decided by us and reported in 194 So.2d 139.

Therefore, for the reasons assigned in said consolidated case, the judgment of the trial court is reversed and there is judgment herein rejecting the demands of the plaintiff, at his costs.

Reversed.
<PAGE>   1

                                                                    Exhibit 21.1

                                  Subsidiaries


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                      Name                          Jurisdiction of Organization
                      ----                          ----------------------------
<S>                                                 <C>
         AAA Factory Model Center, Inc.                       Tennessee
         Palm Harbor Finance Corporation                      Texas
         Palm Harbor G.P., Inc.                               Nevada
         Standard Casualty Corp.                              Texas
         Better Homes Systems, Inc.                           Washington
         Palm Harbor Investments, Inc.                        Nevada
         Palm Harbor Holding, Inc.                            Nevada
         Standard Insurance Agency, Inc.                      Texas
         CountryPlace Mortgage, Ltd.                          Texas
         Palm Harbor Homes I, L.P.                            Texas
         First Home Mortgage Corporation                      Georgia
</TABLE>
#### Walter L. MEDLIN, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

No. 44059.

Supreme Court of Florida.

July 12, 1973.

Certiorari dismissed, sua sponte.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

## FILED June 25, 2003 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-50147 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus FELIX FIDEL GUARDIOLA-SALAS, also known as Fidel Guardiola-Salas, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. EP-02-CR-1111-ALL-PM

-------------------- Before DeMOSS, DENNIS, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Felix Fidel Guardiola-Salas appeals the sentence imposed following his guilty plea conviction of being found in the United States after deportation/removal in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Guardiola complains that his sentence was improperly enhanced pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) based on a prior conviction. He argues that the sentencing provision is unconstitutional. Guardiola thus contends that his sentence should not exceed theNo. 03-50147 -2- two-year maximum term of imprisonment prescribed in 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a).
In Almendarez-Torres v. United States , 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998), the Supreme Court held that the enhanced penalties in 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) are sentencing provisions, not elements of separate offenses. The Court further held that the sentencing provisions do not violate the Due Process Clause. Id. at 239-47. Guardiola acknowledges that his argument is foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres , but asserts that the decision has been cast into doubt by Apprendi v. New Jersey , 530 U.S. 466, 490 (2000). He seeks to preserve his argument for further review. Apprendi did not overrule Almendarez-Torres
. See Apprendi , 530 U.S. at 489-90; United States v. Dabeit , 231 F.3d 979, 984 (5th Cir. 2000). This court must follow Almendarez-Torres “unless and until the Supreme Court itself determines to overrule it.” Dabeit , 231 F.3d at 984 (internal quotation marks and citation omitted). The judgment of the district court is
AFFIRMED. The Government has moved for a summary affirmance in lieu of filing an appellee’s brief. In its motion, the Government asks that an appellee’s brief not be required. The motion is GRANTED.
AFFIRMED; MOTION GRANTED.
An official website of the United States government                

----

end of header

Census.govNewsroomReleases2010 Census

# Newsroom Archive

Skip left menu navigation                          - About the Newsroom
                          - Facts for Features
                          - **News Releases**
                          - Press Kits
                          - Tip Sheets

### Release Information

**CB07-DR.07**
**Contact:**  Stacy GimbelPublic Information Office(301) 763-3030 (phone)(301) 763-3762 (fax)(301) 457-1037 (TDD)PIO@census.gov

## FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:  THURSDAY, APRIL 5, 2007

## Media Advisory — U.S. Census Bureau Kicks Off 2008 Dress Rehearsal

### Commerce Under Secretary to Attend Fayetteville Event

CONNECT WITH US**********

                            - Information Quality
                            - Data Linkage Infrastructure
                            - Data Protection and Privacy Policy
                            - Accessibility
                            - FOIA
                            - Inspector General
                            - No FEAR Act
                            - U.S. Department of Commerce
                            - USA.gov

----

Measuring America's People, Places, and Economy

Is this page helpful?
YesNo

NO THANKS

255 characters maximum255 characters maximum reached

Thank you for your feedback.Comments or suggestions? 

PIO@census.gov
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Stephen J. Markman

, Chief Justice

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Kurtis T. Wilder

Elizabeth T. Clement

, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

September 12, 2018

s0905 

# Order

Clerk September 12, 2018

155673

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 155673

COA: 334918

Saginaw CC: 2010

- 033977

- FC

STEVEN DEWAYAN OWENS

, Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the March 6 , 2017 order

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has

failed to meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D).

W ILDE R , J., did not participate because he was on the Court of Appeals panel.
#### COOK QUIK, INC. and Employers Service Corporation, Petitioners, v. Lewis J. JOINER and Florida Industrial Commission, Respondents.

No. 38136.

Supreme Court of Florida.

March 12, 1969.

Calvin A. Pope, Peter P. Behuniak and Pope & Burton, Tampa, for petitioners.

Denzil Y. Causey, J.r., H. Guy Smith, Jr., Tampa, Patrick H. Mears, and J. Franklin Garner, Tallahassee, for respondents.

PER CURIAM.

By petition for writ of certiorari, we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission bearing date November 20, 1968.

*5We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 32 F.S.A.

Our consideration of the petitions, records and briefs leads us to conclude that there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law.

The petition for certiorari is therefore denied.

Attorneys’ fees in the amount of $250.00 are awarded to respondent-Lewis J. Joiner’s attorney.

It is so ordered.

ROBERTS, Acting C. J., and DREW, THORNAL, CARLTON and ADKINS, JJ., concur.
Order entered June 19, 2015

In The 

## Court of Appeals **Fifth District of Texas at Dallas**
No. 05
- 15
- 00646
- CV
ADT SECURITY SERVICE S, INC., Appellant
V. VAN PETERSON FINE JE WELERS, Appellee On Appeal from the 191st Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 09
- 12111 

### O RDER On June 3, 2015, we denied the unopposed motion of nonresi dent attorney Charles C.
Eblen for pro hac vice admission without prejudice to filing a motion accompanied by a motion of the resident practicing Texas attorney with whom he shall be associated. On June 8, 2015, the Court received the motion of resident counsel in support of Mr. Eblen’s unopposed motion for pro hac vice admission. Accordingly, we VACATE our order dated June 3, 2015. We now GRANT the J une 2, 2015 unopposed motion for pro hac vice admission of nonresident attorney Charles C. Eblen.
We DIRECT the Clerk of this Court to add Charles C. Eblen as counsel pro hac vice.
/s/ ELIZABETH LANG

- MIERS JUSTICE
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

November 2, 2015

No. 04-15-00338-CV

Arthur BUTCHER,

Appellant

v.

CITY OF SAN ANTONIO, Acting by and through its agent City Public Service Board 

d/b/a CPS Energy,

Appellee

From the 408th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2013-CI-05172

Honorable John D. Gabriel, Jr., Judge Presiding

O R D E R

Appellant's motion for extension of time to file amended brief is hereby GRANTED. 

_________________________________

Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 2nd day of November, 2015.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
<PAGE>




                                                                    EXHIBIT 24.1

                                POWER OF ATTORNEY

        KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS: That the undersigned hereby
constitutes and appoints Stig Johansson, Joachim W. Bauer, Kees van Ophem, Neil
E. Craven, Eugene A. Rizzo and Terje Nordahl and each of them (with full power
to act alone) the undersigned's true and lawful attorney-in-fact and agent, with
full power of substitution and resubstitution, for and in the name and on behalf
of the undersigned, to execute any and all instruments and documents, and to do
any and all other acts and things, that any such attorney-in-fact and agent may
deem necessary or advisable, in compliance with the Securities Act of 1933, as
amended (the "Securities Act"), the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended
and any rules, regulations and requirements of the Securities and Exchange
Commission (the "Commission") in respect thereof, in connection with the
registration under the Securities Act of shares of capital of Carrier 1
International S.A. (the "Shares") pursuant to a registration statement (the
"Registration Statement") to be filed with the Commission relating to the
offering from time to time to the public by beneficial holders of Dollar
Warrants and Euro Warrants of Carrier 1 International S.A. and by any other
person named in such Registration Statement of Shares (and any depositary
receipts in respect thereof); including specifically, but without limiting the
generality of the foregoing, the power and authority to execute, for and in the
name and on behalf of the undersigned in any and all capacities, the
Registration Statement, and any and all supplements and amendments (including,
without limitation, any pre-effective and post-effective amendments and any
subsequent registration statements pursuant to Rule 462(b) under the Securities
Act) to such Registration Statement, and any and all other instruments or
documents filed as a part of, or in connection with, such Registration Statement
and supplements and amendments thereto (including, without limitation, if
necessary, a registration statement under the Securities Act of depositary
shares represented by American depositary receipts to be filed on Form F-6); and
the undersigned hereby ratifies and confirms all that such attorneys-in-fact and
agents, or any of them, shall do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.

Signed this 2nd day of August, 2000.

                                                   /s/ Glenn M. Creamer
                                                   -----------------------------
                                                   Name: Glenn M. Creamer