alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Ruby LAMPMAN, Appellant, v. CITY OF NORTH MIAMI, a municipal corporation, and Daniel DeCicco, Appellees.

No. 67-557.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Third District.

April 23, 1968.

Ralph M. Jones, Miami, for appellant.

Stephens, Demos & Magill, Dean, Adams, George *&*Wood, Miami, for appellees.

Before CHARLES CARROLL, C. J., and PEARSON and HENDRY, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff below appeals an order granting summary final judgment in favor of the defendants. We find this case to be closely analogous to the case of Visingardi v. Tirone, Fla.1966, 193 So.2d 601. It is the burden of a party moving for summary judgment to show conclusively that no material issues remain for trial. Plaintiff must, of course, prove the elements of her cause of action, but she need not do so until trial. To require her to prove her case in order to successfully oppose a motion for summary judgment imposes a burden upon plaintiff that is neither contemplated nor justified under the cases and rules of procedure. Therefore, the order appealed must be reversed.

Reversed.
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 311

To provide reduced rates for nonprofit senior citizens organizations.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JANUARY 5, 1993

Mr. QUILLEN introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Post Office and Civil Service

A BILL

To provide reduced rates for nonprofit senior citizens

organizations.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That (a) section 3626 of title 39, United States Code, is

4 amended by adding at the end thereof the following new

5 subsection:

6 ‘‘(m)(1) In the administration of this section, the

7 rates for third-class mail matter mailed by a qualified non8 profit organization of senior citizens shall be the rates cur9 rently in effect under former section 4452 of this title for

10 third-class mail matter mailed by a qualified nonprofit or11 ganization.
2

HR 311 IH

1 ‘‘(2) For the purposes of this subsection, the term

2 ‘qualified nonprofit organization of senior citizens’ means

3 any nonprofit organization whose membership is composed

4 of senior citizens and whose primary purpose is the ad5 vancement of activities and programs of benefit to senior

6 citizens.’’.

7 (b) Section 2401(c) of title 39, United States Code,

8 is amended by striking ‘‘and 3626(a)–(h) and (j) to (k)’’

9 and inserting ‘‘and subsections (a)–(h), (j) to (k), and (m)

10 of section 3626’’.

Æ
#### Ellis THOMAS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 71-708.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Oct. 5, 1972.

Appeal dismissed.
Exhibit 32.1
 
 
 
 Certification of CEO Pursuant to
 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
 As Adopted Pursuant to
 Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
 
 In connection with the Quarterly Report of Zhong Wen International Holding Co., Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Sun Hongyi, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of his knowledge, that:
 
 (1)           The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2)           The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
 
 
 
 /s/ Sun HongyiChief Executive Officer and Chief Financial OfficerMay 11, 2011
 
 
 This certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
 
 A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Zhong Wen International Holding Co., Inc. and will be retained by Zhong Wen International Holding Co., Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
R 9 A i r P e rm i t

s to: O me r S ha l ev 09 / 24/ 2012 03 : 18

PM S ent b y: G eoff

r e y G l a ss

----- Fo rw

a r ded b y G eo ffr

e y G l a ss /R 9

/USEPA/US on 09

/ 24/ 2012 03 : 18

P M -----

M A R S H A LL to: R9

A i rP e rm i ts 09 / 23/ 2012 04 : 32

AM

I liv e a cr o ss the h i gh w a y f r o m S

. P

. i n A nde rs on and the l a s t w ee ko r s o I' v e not i c ed a l ot o fb r o w n s m o k e
c o m i ng out o fthe gene r at i ng f a c ili t y the y a l r ead y ha v e. M y

que s t i on i s , ha v e the y on l y s ta rted r unn i ng i t i n the da y t i m e r e c ent l y . I don't e v e r r e m e m be r s ee i ng the s m o k e. I f i gu r ed the y on l y r an at n i ght .I w ou l d ha v e to be aga i n s t i t i f w e w ill be i n cr ea s i ng the a m ount o fb r o w n s m o k e

--- S M OG-- I F Y O U W ILL IN T O T H E A IR. Ma rs ha ll K nau ss , 6220 Do l o r e s a ve
# C_2012387EN.01002701.xml

| 15.12.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 387/27 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.12.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 387/27

---

Corrigendum to notice of open competition EPSO/AST/125/12

(
  Official Journal of the European Union C 384 of 13 December 2012
  )

Official Journal of the European Union C 384 of 13 December 2012

2012/C 387/10

The publication of notice of open competition EPSO/AST/125/12 is to be considered null and void.

---
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-41241

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

FRANCISCO GUTIERREZ-PINEDA,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 2:09-CR-697-1

Before WIENER, PRADO, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

*

Francisco Gutierrez-Pineda (Gutierrez) pleaded guilty pursuant to a

written plea agreement to possession with intent to distribute cocaine, and the

district court sentenced him to 108 months of imprisonment. More than five

months after the entry of the judgment, he filed a notice of appeal. The district

court denied Gutierrez leave to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP) on appeal,

certifying that the appeal was not taken in good faith in light of the untimeliness

of his notice of appeal.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

May 10, 2011

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not *

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

Case: 10-41241 Document: 00511471752 Page: 1 Date Filed: 05/10/2011
No. 10-41241

Gutierrez moves this court for appointment of counsel and leave to appeal

IFP. We may dismiss an appeal when considering an interlocutory motion if the

appeal “is frivolous and entirely without merit.” 5TH CIR. R. 42.2. Gutierrez did

not file his notice of appeal within 14 days after the entry of the judgment as

required by Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 4(b)(1)(A)(i) or within Rule

4(b)(4)’s 30-day window for seeking an extension of time. He is not entitled to

have the untimeliness of his notice of appeal disregarded. See United States v.

Leijano-Cruz, 473 F.3d 571, 574 (5th Cir. 2006). Accordingly, we deny the

motions for appointment of counsel and leave to appeal IFP, and we dismiss the

appeal as frivolous. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

MOTIONS DENIED; APPEAL DISMISSED.

2

Case: 10-41241 Document: 00511471752 Page: 2 Date Filed: 05/10/2011
```

[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 161 (Monday, August 20, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Page 42144]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-17899]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Antitrust Division

Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and 
Production Act of 1993--National Fire Protection Association

    Notice is hereby given that, on July 31, 2018, pursuant to Section 
6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 
15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), National Fire Protection 
Association (``NFPA'') has filed written notifications simultaneously 
with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing 
additions or changes to its standards development activities. The 
notifications were filed for the purpose of extending the Act's 
provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual 
damages under specified circumstances. Specifically, NFPA has provided 
an updated and current list of its standards development activities, 
related technical committee and conformity assessment activities. 
Information concerning NFPA regulations, technical committees, current 
standards, standards development and conformity assessment activities 
are publicly available at nfpa.org.
    On September 20, 2004, NFPA filed its original notification 
pursuant to Section 6(a) of the Act. The Department of Justice 
published a notice in the Federal Register pursuant to Section 6(b) of 
the Act on October 21, 2004 (69 FR 61869).
    The last notification was filed with the Department on May 8, 2018. 
A notice was published in the Federal Register pursuant to Section 6(b) 
of the Act on May 25, 2018 (83 FR 24348).

Suzanne Morris
Chief, Premerger and Division Statistics Unit, Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. 2018-17899 Filed 8-17-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4410-11-P
```
#### Arthur Franklin GRIFFIN, Petitioner, v. M R & R TRUCKING COMPANY, a Florida corporation, Respondent.

No. 36579.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Jan. 24, 1968.

Logue, Bennett & Williams, Panama City, and William J. Rish, Port St. Joe, for petitioner.

Benjamin W. Redding, of Barron & Hilton, Panama City, and Wilfred C. Varn, of Ervin, Pennington, Varn & Jacobs, Tallahassee, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of certiorari reflected apparent jurisdiction in this Court. We issued the writ and have heard oral argument of the parties. After argument and upon further consideration of the matter we have determined that the cited decisions present no direct conflict as required by Article V, Section 4, Florida Constitution, *211F.S.A. Therefore, the writ must be and is hereby discharged and the petition for writ of certiorari is dismissed.

It is so ordered.

CALDWELL, C. J., and THOMAS, DREW, THORNAL and ADAMS, JJ., concur.
### TEXA S C OU R T OF A PPEAL S, THIR D DIST R ICT , AT AU STIN NO. 03-0 7 -00 656 -CV In re Ciro Rivera ORI GINAL PRO CEEDING FRO M CALDWELL COUNTY M E M O R

A N D U M O P I N I O N Relator Ciro Rive ra ’s M otion for Tempora ry Relief and his Petition for Writ of Mandamus ar e denie d.

G. Alan Waldrop, Just ice Be fore Chief J ustice L aw, Justi ces Pembe rton and Waldrop Filed: Nove mber 27, 2007
** **
**Exhibit      32.1**

**CERTIFICATIONS      PURSUANT TO **

**SECTION      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

**(18      U.S.C. SECTION 1350)**

|                                          |                                                                                                            |                                    |
|-----------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------|
|                                     |                                                                                                       |                               |
| Date:              March 16, 2007   | By:                                                                                                   | /s/ L.              Michael Cutrer |
|                                          |                                                                                                                 |
|                                          |  L.                Michael Cutrer President                and Chief                Executive Officer |
|                                    |                                                                                                                             |                                          |
|-----------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------|
| Date:              March 16, 2007  | By:                                                                                                                    | /s/ James              W. Klingler  |
|                                    |                                                                                                                                  |
|                                    |  James                W. Klingler Senior                Vice President and Chief                Financial Officer |

----
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Con-way Inc. (the Company) for the period
ended December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Kevin C. Schick, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant
to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dated: February 27, 2008



|                    |  |                        
|------------------- |  | -----------------------
|/s/ Kevin C. Schick
|Name:               |  | Kevin C. Schick        
|Title:              |  | Chief Financial Officer
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.2

                         INDEPENDENT AUDITOR'S CONSENT

The Board of Directors and Stockholders
Viatel, Inc.:

    The audits referred to in our report dated March 1, 2000, included the
related financial statement schedule as of December 31, 1999 and for each of the
years in the three-year period ended December 31, 1999, incorporated by
reference in the registration statement. This financial statement schedule is
the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express
an opinion on this financial statement schedule based on our audits. In our
opinion, such financial statement schedule, when considered in relation to the
basic consolidated financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly in all
material respects the information set forth therein.

    We consent to the use of our reports incorporated herein by reference and to
the reference to our firm under the heading "Experts" in the prospectus.

<TABLE>
<S>                                                    <C>
                                                       /s/ KPMG LLP
                                                       ----------------------------
                                                       KPMG LLP
</TABLE>

New York, New York
September 7, 2000
# C_2013085EN.01000201.xml

| 23.3.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 85/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.3.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 85/2

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

22 March 2013

2013/C 85/02

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,2948 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 122,85 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4527 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,85280 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 8,4232 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,2212 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 7,5395 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 25,832 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 307,25 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,7023 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,1803 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,4283 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,3558 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,2412 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,3259 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 10,0517 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,5559 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,6177 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 449,45 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 12,0706 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 8,0433 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,5945 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 12 629,65 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,0295 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 52,877 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 40,0100 |
| THB | Thai baht | 37,964 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 2,6072 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 16,0711 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 70,3610 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,2948

JPY

Japanese yen

122,85

DKK

Danish krone

7,4527

GBP

Pound sterling

0,85280

SEK

Swedish krona

8,4232

CHF

Swiss franc

1,2212

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

7,5395

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

25,832

HUF

Hungarian forint

307,25

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,7023

PLN

Polish zloty

4,1803

RON

Romanian leu

4,4283

TRY

Turkish lira

2,3558

AUD

Australian dollar

1,2412

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,3259

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

10,0517

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,5559

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,6177

KRW

South Korean won

1 449,45

ZAR

South African rand

12,0706

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

8,0433

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,5945

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

12 629,65

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,0295

PHP

Philippine peso

52,877

RUB

Russian rouble

40,0100

THB

Thai baht

37,964

BRL

Brazilian real

2,6072

MXN

Mexican peso

16,0711

INR

Indian rupee

70,3610

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 159 (Thursday, August 16, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Page 40800]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-17632]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-83829; File No. SR-NYSEAMER-2018-22]


Self-Regulatory Organizations; NYSE American LLC; Notice of 
Withdrawal of a Proposed Rule Change To Amend Exchange Rule 7.35E 
Relating to the Auction Reference Price for a Trading Halt Auction 
Following a Regulatory Halt

August 10, 2018.
    On May 15, 2018, NYSE American LLC (``Exchange'' or ``NYSE 
American'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission 
(``Commission''), pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities 
Exchange Act of 1934 (``Act'') \1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ a 
proposed rule change to amend Exchange Rule 7.35E relating to the 
Auction Reference Price for a Trading Halt Auction following a 
regulatory halt. The proposed rule change was published for comment in 
the Federal Register on June 5, 2018.\3\ On July 18, 2018, pursuant to 
Section 19(b)(2) of the Act,\4\ the Commission designated a longer 
period within which to approve the proposed rule change, disapprove the 
proposed rule change, or institute proceedings to determine whether to 
disapprove the proposed rule change.\5\ The Commission has received one 
comment letter in response to the proposed rule change.\6\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
    \3\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 83341 (May 30, 
2018), 83 FR 26121 (Jun. 5, 2018) (Notice).
    \4\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).
    \5\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 83668 (Jul. 18, 
2018), 83 FR 35040 (Jul. 24, 2018).
    \6\ See Letter from Duane Fiedler, to Secretary, Securities and 
Exchange Commission (Jun. 23, 2018).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    On August 10, 2018, the Exchange withdrew the proposed rule change 
(SR-NYSEAmer-2018-22).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets, 
pursuant to delegated authority.\7\
Brent J. Fields,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2018-17632 Filed 8-15-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 8011-01-P
U.S. flag
              An official website of the United States government Skip to main content   end of header Census.gov Newsroom Releases Governments
 Newsroom Archive
 Skip left menu navigation
 About the Newsroom
 				Facts for Features
 				**News Releases**
 				Press Kits
 				Tip Sheets
 Release Information CB11-TPS.27 **Contact:**  Public Information Office
301-763-3030/763-3762 (fax)
 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:  TUESDAY, SEPT. 27, 2011 2011 2nd Quarter Summary of State and Local Government Tax Revenue https://www.census.gov/govs/qtax/
  CONNECT WITH US

Information Quality
                    Data Linkage Infrastructure
                    Data Protection and Privacy Policy
                    Accessibility      
                    FOIA
                    Inspector General
                    No FEAR Act
                    U.S. Department of Commerce
                    USA.gov
                   Measuring America's People, Places, and Economy
# C_2013376EN.01000102.xml

| 21.12.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 376/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.12.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 376/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.7118 — AXA/Norges Bank/SZ Tower)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2013/C 376/02

On 16 December 2013, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32013M7118. EUR-Lex is the online access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32013M7118. EUR-Lex is the online access to the European law.

---
Once the district court has entered a final, written order

resolving all of the claims and issues below, any aggrieved party may appeal. Accordingly, we

ORDER this appeal DISMISSED.

cc: Hon. T. Arthur Ritchie, Jr., District Judge, Family Court Division Stacey Midby-Weiss Michael Brian Weiss Eighth District Court Clerk

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA 2 (0) 1947A 0