alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 325

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to extend and modify the

targeted jobs credit.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JANUARY 5, 1993

Mr. RANGEL introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Ways and Means

A BILL

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to extend

and modify the targeted jobs credit.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. EXTENSION AND MODIFICATION OF TARGETED

4 JOB CREDIT.

5 (a) EXTENSION.—Paragraph (4) of section 51(c) of

6 the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to termi7 nation) is hereby repealed.

8 (b) RESTORATION OF ECONOMICALLY DISADVAN9 TAGED YOUTH STATUS TO INDIVIDUALS WHO HAVE NOT

10 ATTAINED AGE 25.—
2

•HR 325 IH

1 (1) IN GENERAL.—Subparagraph (B) of section

2 51(d)(3) of such Code is amended by striking ‘‘age

3 23’’ and inserting ‘‘age 25’’.

4 (2) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made

5 by paragraph (1) shall apply to individuals who

6 begin work for the employer after June 30, 1992.

7 SEC. 2. CREDIT ELIGIBILITY FOR CERTAIN VETERANS.

8 (a) VETERANS DESIGNATED.—Paragraph (1) of sec9 tion 51(d) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating

10 to members of targeted groups) is amended by striking

11 ‘‘or’’ at the end of subparagraph (I), by striking the period

12 at the end of subparagraph (J) and inserting ‘‘, or’’, and

13 by adding at the end thereof the following new subpara14 graph:

15 ‘‘(K) an economically disadvantaged vet16 eran.’’

17 (b) ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED VETERAN DE18 FINED.—Section 51(d) of such Code is amended by adding

19 at the end thereof the following new paragraph:

20 ‘‘(17) VETERAN WHO IS A MEMBER OF AN ECO21 NOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED FAMILY.—The term

22 ‘veteran who is a member of an economically dis23 advantaged family’ means any individual who is cer24 tified by the designated local agency as—
3

•HR 325 IH

1 ‘‘(A) having served in the active military,

2 naval, or air services (other than active duty for

3 training) of the United States,

4 ‘‘(B) having been discharged or released

5 from such service under conditions other than

6 dishonorable, and

7 ‘‘(C) being a member of an economically

8 disadvantaged family (determined under para9 graph (11)).’’

10 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by

11 this section shall apply to individuals who begin work for

12 the employer after June 30, 1993.

Æ
U.S. flag
              An official website of the United States government





---

close


Serbia
 Basic Facts Population
 People per sq. km
 Males per 100 females
 Children per woman
 Goods exported from U.S.
 Goods imported to U.S.
 Change in exports from U.S. for 2013 to 2022
 A Closer Look Source
 Comparisons
 Compared to the U.S.
 Compared to the World
 K = Thousands
				M = Millions
				B = Billions
  Merchandise Trade U.S. Trade in Manufactured Goods
 Top Exported Goods by U.S. State or Territory
 Population Current and Projected Population
 Population by Age and Sex
 Source and Notes Source: U.S. Census Bureau, International Database (demographic data) and USA Trade Online (trade data); Central Intelligence Agency, The World Fact Book (country reference maps). This application presents data for 228 countries and areas of the world with a 2024 population of 5,000 or more. For eleven of those countries and areas, only demographic data are presented. "Data not available" indicates that data are not available from this application.  In such instances, data may be available elsewhere at the census.gov website. Trade figures presented for France do not include data for overseas departments French Guiana, Guadeloupe, Martinique, Mayotte, and Reunion but do include data for dependencies Saint Barthelemy and Saint Martin.  Trade figures for the United Kingdom include data for crown dependencies Guernsey, Isle of Man, and Jersey. To learn more about world population projections, go to Notes on the World Population Clock. To learn more about international trade data, go to Guide to Foreign Trade Statistics. All trade figures are in U.S. dollars on a nominal basis.


CONNECT WITH US
 Information Quality
                    Data Linkage Infrastructure
                    Data Protection and Privacy Policy
                    Accessibility      
                    FOIA
                    Inspector General
                    No FEAR Act
                    U.S. Department of Commerce
                    USA.gov
  Measuring America's People, Places, and Economy
#### M. H. ROSENHOUSE, Appellant, v. N. J. SCHUMER et al., Appellees.

No. 967.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Fourth District.

Feb. 8, 1967.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Brevard County; Williarh G. Akridge, Judge.

Appeal dismissed.
**Exhibit 32.2**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

The undersigned hereby certifies, in his capacity as the Principal Financial Officer of China ShouGuan Mining Corporation (the “Company”), for the purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of his knowledge:

(1)  The Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 21, 2015 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

| Dated:   May 20, 2015

/s/ Chengqing Tan

  

Chengqing Tan 

Principal Financial Officer

 

(Principal Financial Officer)

This certification accompanies each Report pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of §18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request. |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS For the Fifth Circuit

No. 01-40953 Summary Calendar

In The Matter of: THOMAS A. RIVERA; SONIA DE LA ROSA;

ANTONIO MARTINEZ; JOHN BRAUN,

Debtors.

-------------------------------------

THOMAS A. RIVERA; SONIA DE LA ROSA; ROBERT P. MCGUILL; ISMAEL ESPINOSA; MARICELA GARZA;; STEPHEN PEREZ, for themselves and on behalf of all others similarly situated,

Appellants,

VERSUS

AT&T CORP.; TIME WARNER, INC.; TELE-COMMUNICATIONS, INC.; TCI CABLEVISION OF TEXAS, INC.; TEXAS CABLE PARTNERS LP; KBL CABLESYSTEMS OF THE SOUTHWEST, INC.; TCI CENTRAL, INC.; TIME WARNER ENTERTAINMENT COMPANY LP; TWI CABLE, INC.,

Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court For the Southern District of Texas

(V-00-CV-93)
March 25, 2002

Before DeMOSS, PARKER, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that this

opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4.

2 PER CURIAM: *

The “Rivera appellants” (as defined in their Notice of Appeal

filed under date of July 20, 2001) brought this suit against AT&T

Corporation and the other corporations named in their Notice of

Appeal (the “cable television providers”) asserting a civil class

action on behalf of themselves and other similarly situated under

the federal Racketeering Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act

(RICO) premised upon the theory that the cable television providers

were violating RICO by charging a $3 or $5 monthly fee for late

payment of bills f or television services. The cable television

providers moved to dismiss the Rivera appellants’ lawsuit under

Rule 12(b)(6) because the Rivera appellan ts’ petition failed to

state a claim or cause of action upon which recovery could be made.

T he district judge granted such motion after entering a 12-page

order which carefully analyzed the Rivera ap pellants’ petition.

The Rivera appellants now appeal to this Court.

We have carefully reviewed the bri efs, the reply brief, the

record excerpts, and relevant portions of the record itself. For

the reasons stated by the district court in its Order of Dismissal3

filed April 18, 2001, we affirm the decision of the district court

to dismiss with prejudice all of the Rivera appellants’ claims

against the cable television providers.

AFFIRMED

.
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2908 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2908

                  For the relief of Peggi M. Houston.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             August 6, 1993

Mr. Ballenger introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
                  For the relief of Peggi M. Houston.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. AUTHORITY TO FILE CLAIM.

    Notwithstanding--
            (1) any law barring an action against the United States for 
        injuries sustained incident to service by any member of the 
        Armed Forces of the United States; and
            (2) section 2680(k) of title 28, United States Code,
Peggi M. Houston of Newland, North Carolina, may present a claim and 
commence an action under chapter 171 of title 28, United States Code, 
for the wrongful death of her husband, Captain Thomas C. Houston, in 
connection with the allegedly negligent medical diagnosis and treatment 
by United States Army personnel at the aid station and Medical 
Dispensary for the Eleventh Army Calvary Regiment in Fulda, Germany, in 
1993.

                                 <all>
```
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3206 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3206

  To amend the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968 to 
   allow personnel at correctional facilities to qualify to receive 
                           certain benefits.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 30, 1993

  Mr. Strickland (for himself and Mr. Mann) introduced the following 
       bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968 to 
   allow personnel at correctional facilities to qualify to receive 
                           certain benefits.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Public Safety Officers' Benefits 
Fairness Act''.

SEC. 2. BENEFITS FOR PERSONNEL IN CORRECTIONAL FACILITIES.

    Section 1204(5) of the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act 
of 1968 is amended--
            (1) by striking the comma after ``corrections''; and
            (2) by inserting in lieu thereof ``(including personnel in 
        correctional facilities),''.

                                 <all>
```
#### PARK LANE CAFETERIA NO. 2, etc., et al., Petitioners, v. Celester PARKER et al., Respondents.

No. 38873.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Nov. 20, 1970.

Certiorari dismissed.
#### Otis WATTS, Jr., Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 72-1124.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

May 15, 1973.

Pollack, Yocom & Haggard, Alvin E. Entin, Miami, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., and William L. Rogers, Asst. Atty. Gen., and Sheridan Weinstein, Legal Intern, for appellee.

Before BARKDULL, C. J., and PEARSON and HAVERFIELD, JJ.

*566PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. Peacock v. State, Fla.App.1964, 160 So.2d 541; Simpson v. State, Fla.App.1968, 211 So.2d 862; Mahone v. State, Fla.App.1969, 222 So.2d 769; Ricks v. State, Fla.App.1971, 242 So.2d 763; McKissack v. State, Fla.App.1971, 243 So.2d 14; Williams v. State, Fla.App.1971, 243 So.2d 215; Arbogast v. State, Fla.App. 1972, 266 So.2d 161.
RESPONDED ON DECEMBER 1, 2009 9:32 AM 

Carol J. Carmody, President, Carmody & Associates 

1. Review the last 2 Commission reports (Le. the Baliles report and the Mineta report) 

to see what recommendations may be useful. A lot of smart people participated in both 

those efforts and we need not re-tread the same ground. 

2. Review the efforts and organization of the ATO to determine if it has worked as 

intended. Are there ways the FAA leadership and the ATO could be more effective in 

delivering NEXGEN benefits? 

3. How will the FAA assure technical expertise on its advisory committees in light of 

the Administration concerns on participation of lobbyists? Are there ways to secure the 

views and participation of experts from all parts of the industry? 

4. Assess the status of aeronautical/air traffic R&D. The FAA's R&D budget is 

minimal; much of the aviation research previously done by NASA has been 

discontinued. How should important R&D be funded? Who should do it? 

5. Much of the past year has been spent discussing FAA funding mechanisms and all 

that the various mechanisms entail. Two truths have emerged: the FAA needs an assured 

funding stream to implement and execute capacity solutions; Trust Fund revenues are 

/ ' r~ intended to fund capacity improvements for the traveling public. The FAA administrator 

should have the strongest voice in determining the value of capacity improvements. Is 

the aviation community prepared to allow the FAA to do this? The Commission should 

consider how to reinforce and reinvigorate the top management of the FAA (who are 

confirmed by the Senate and therefore accountable) to make the decisions about 

resources and projects that will deliver the system improvements that are so desperately 
needed. Otherwise the current quagmire of competing voices, differing agendas and 

interest group pressure will continue to the detriment of solid gains in the aviation 

arena.
H. R. 3049

One Hundred Third Congress

of the

United States of America

AT THE FIRST SESSION

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,

the fifth day of January, one thousand nine hundred and ninety-three

An Act

To extend the current interim exemption under the Marine Mammal Protection

Act for commercial fisheries until April 1, 1994.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled, That section

114(a)(1) of the Marine Mammal Protection Act of 1972 (16 U.S.C.

1383a(a)(1)), is amended by striking ‘‘October 1, 1993,’’ and inserting

in lieu thereof ‘‘April 1, 1994,’’.

Speaker of the House of Representatives.

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.

19:33 Sep 23, 1993 VerDate 01-JUL-93 Jkt 059200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6655 Sfmt 6501 E:\BILLS\H3049.ENR bend06
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

SHAWN KEVIN BRES,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 231 WAL 2019

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 2nd day of January, 2020, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

GRANTED. The issue, as stated by petitioner, is:

Did the Superior Court err in ruling that the Honorable Donna Jo McDaniel 

correctly treated the Petitioner’s Amended Post-Conviction Relief Act 

Petition and/or Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, which challenged the 

constitutionality of Subchapter I of the Pennsylvania Sex Offender 

Registration and Notification Act (which was recently enacted into law on 

February 21, 2018), as an untimely petition filed pursuant to the PostConviction Relief Act?
#### William GOLDBERG and Elizabeth Ann Goldberg, his wife, Appellants, v. CONTEXT INDUSTRIES, INC., etc., et al., Appellees.

No. 77-1053.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Sept. 12, 1978.

Rehearing Denied Oct. 18, 1978.

*975Philip M. Gerson, Miami, for appellants.

Wicker, Smith, Blomqvist, Davant, MeMath, Tutan & O’Hara and Richard A. Sherman, Miami, for appellees.

Before HENDRY and BARKDULL, JJ., and PARKER, J. GWYNN (Ret.), Associate Judge.

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal by appellants/plaintiffs from an adverse summary final judgment entered in an action for personal injuries sustained by appellant, William Goldberg in a slip and fall accident at the place of his employment.

The action was brought against: (1) Context Industries, Inc., the lessee of the premises; (2) Armer E. White and Harold D. White, tenants in common owners of the premises; (3) Bobby L. Johns, the general contractor for construction at the premises; and (4) Tropical Landscape Co., the landscape contractors for the premises.

All defendants moved for a summary judgment. The motion was granted in favor of Context Industries, Inc. on the ground that appellants’ claims were barred because William Goldberg had accepted workman’s compensation benefits from Context Realty, Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of Context Industries, Inc. The motion was denied as to the other defendants.

The point on appeal is whether the parent corporation of a wholly owned subsidiary which appears as a joint insured with the subsidiary corporation on a policy of workmen’s compensation insurance is the “employer” of an injured employee of the subsidiary corporation so as to bar an independent tort action against the parent corporation after the employee has collected workman’s compensation from the subsidiary corporation.

The trial court ruled that the action against the parent corporation was barred because workman’s compensation had been collected by appellant Goldberg from the subsidiary corporation, Context Realty, Inc. After a careful examination of the record on appeal, we have concluded that summary judgment was properly entered in favor of appellee, Context Industries, Inc.

Accordingly, the final summary judgment appealed from is hereby affirmed.

Affirmed.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

TIMOTHY MORGAN,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 258 MAL 2021

Petition for Allowance of Appeal

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 7th day of September, 2022

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED

. The application for amici curiae is DENIED as moot.
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 158 (Wednesday, August 15, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Pages 40617-40618]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-17577]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

[Disaster Declaration #15626 and #15627; Nebraska Disaster Number NE-
00071]


Administrative Declaration of a Disaster for the State of 
Nebraska

AGENCY: U.S. Small Business Administration.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This is a notice of an Administrative declaration of a 
disaster for the State of Nebraska dated 08/07/2018.
    Incident: Severe Storms and Flooding.
    Incident Period: 06/25/2018 through 06/30/2018.

DATES: Issued on 08/07/2018.
    Physical Loan Application Deadline Date: 10/09/2018.
    Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date: 05/07/2019.

ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business 
Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport 
Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A. Escobar, Office of Disaster 
Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street SW, 
Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416, (202) 205-6734.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that as a result of 
the Administrator's disaster declaration, applications for disaster 
loans may be filed at the address listed above or other locally 
announced locations.
    The following areas have been determined to be adversely affected 
by the disaster:
    Primary Counties:
    Iowa.
    Contiguous Counties:

[[Page 40618]]

    Nebraska: Thurston, Burt, Dakota, Wayne, Monona, Cuming, Dixon, 
Woodbury.
    The Interest Rates are:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                Percent
------------------------------------------------------------------------
For Physical Damage:
  Homeowners With Credit Available Elsewhere.................      3.875
  Homeowners Without Credit Available Elsewhere..............      1.938
  Businesses With Credit Available Elsewhere.................      7.220
  Businesses Without Credit Available Elsewhere..............      3.610
  Non-Profit Organizations With Credit Available Elsewhere...      2.500
  Non-Profit Organizations Without Credit Available Elsewhere      2.500
For Economic Injury:
  Businesses & Small Agricultural Cooperatives Without Credit      3.610
   Available Elsewhere.......................................
  Non-Profit Organizations Without Credit Available Elsewhere      2.500
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The number assigned to this disaster for physical damage is 15626 B 
and for economic injury is 15627 0.
    The States which received an EIDL Declaration # are Nebraska and 
Iowa.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number 59008)

    Dated: August 7, 2018.
Linda E. McMahon,
Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2018-17577 Filed 8-14-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 8025-01-P