alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit
32



CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In
connection with the quarterly report of KinerjaPay Corp. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September
30, 2017 (the “Report”), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Edwin Witarsa
Ng, CEO of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:



1.
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
and



2.
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.



|/s/
    Edwin Witarsa Ng    | 
|--------------------------- | 
|Edwin
    Witarsa Ng        | 
|CEO                         | 
|Dated:
    December 8, 2017 | 



A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to KinerjaPay Corp. and will be retained by
the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### DADE COUNTY, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, et al., Appellants, v. HOME MILK PRODUCERS ASSOCIATION, Appellee.

No. 69-372.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Third District.

Oct. 9, 1969.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed.
259 La. 696

#### STATE of Louisiana and the Parish of Caddo v. GULF STATES THEATRES OF LOUISIANA, INC., et al.

No. 51714.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Sept. 13, 1971.

In re: Greater Broadmoor Theatres, Inc., Gulf States Theatres of Louisiana, Inc., and Joseph Gianforte applying for writs of prohibition, certiorari and mandamus.

Application denied. Since the issues presented will be determined by the Court of Appeal after the appeal fixed Oct. 13, the interests of justice will not be served by granting the application.
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk's Office, Atlanta, October 01, 2015. I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written. , Clerk. 

# Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA, October 01, 2015 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order A16A0102. KENNETH RAY EVANS v. TRINITY SERVICES GROUP, INC. et al..
Upon consideration of the APPELLANT'S motion FOR PERMISSION TO WITHDRAW THE APPEAL in the above styled case, it is ordered that the motion is hereby GRANTED.
# C_2013165EN.01000301.xml

| 11.6.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 165/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.6.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 165/3

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.6841 — Goldman Sachs/TPG Lundy/Tulloch Homes Group Limited)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2013/C 165/04

On 22 April 2013, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32013M6841. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32013M6841. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.

---
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

February 4, 2019

No. 04-18-00760-CV

John Loan PRICE,

Appellant

v.

MG BUILDING MATERIALS, LTD.,

Appellee

From the County Court at Law No. 3, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 20417CV05199

Honorable Karen Crouch, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

Appellant’s brief was due to be filed by December 31, 2018. Neither the brief nor a 

motion for extension of time was filed. On January 7, 2019, this court ordered appellant to file, 

by January 22, 2019, a brief and a written response reasonably explaining: (1) his failure to 

timely file a brief, and (2) why appellee is not significantly injured by appellant’s failure to 

timely file a brief. 

One day after the deadline, on January 23, 2019, appellant filed a brief but did not file a 

written response as required by the January 7 order. Accordingly, appellant’s late-filed brief will 

not be accepted until appellant files a written response reasonably explaining: (1) his failure to 

timely file a brief, and (2) why appellee is not significantly injured by appellant’s failure to 

timely file a brief. If appellant fails to file a written response within ten (10) days of the date of 

this order, we will dismiss the appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(c) (allowing involuntary 

dismissal if appellant fails to comply with court order).

_________________________________

Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 4th day of February, 2019.

___________________________________

KEITH E. HOTTLE,

Clerk of Court
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned certifies
that to the best of his knowledge (1) this Quarterly Report of Corporate Capital Trust, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2015, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (this Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and (2) the information contained in this Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition of the Company as of March 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014 and its results of operations for the period ended March 31, 2015.



|                   |  |  |  |  |  |                                                                     
|------------------ |  |  |  |  |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: May 14, 2015 |  |  |  |  |  | /s/ Thomas K. Sittema                                               
|                   |  |  |  |  |  | Thomas K. Sittema                                                   
|                   |  |  |  |  |  | Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive
Officer)               
|                   |  |  | 
|Date: May 14, 2015 |  |  |  |  |  | /s/ Steven D. Shackelford                                           
|                   |  |  |  |  |  | Steven D. Shackelford                                               
|                   |  |  |  |  |  | Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial
and Accounting Officer)
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 303

To amend title 38, United States Code, to permit retired members of the

Armed Forces who have service-connected disabilities to receive compensation from the Department of Veterans Affairs concurrently with

retired pay, without deduction from either.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JANUARY 5, 1993

Mr. BILIRAKIS (for himself, Mr. YOUNG of Florida, and Mr. SHAYS) introduced the following bill; which was referred jointly to the Committees on

Veterans’ Affairs and Armed Services

A BILL

To amend title 38, United States Code, to permit retired

members of the Armed Forces who have service-connected disabilities to receive compensation from the Department of Veterans Affairs concurrently with retired

pay, without deduction from either.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That section 5304(a)(1) of title 38, United States Code,

4 is amended by adding at the end thereof the following:

5 ‘‘Notwithstanding the preceding sentence, emergency offi6 cers’, regular, or reserve retirement pay may be paid to

7 any veteran concurrently with compensation for any serv-
2

•HR 303 IH

1 ice-connected disability, without deduction from either the

2 retirement pay or the compensation; however, nothing in

3 this sentence shall permit payment of retirement pay and

4 of compensation based upon the same disability.’’.

Æ
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 01-10484 

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

TODD WILLIAM GAY,

Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 3:92-CR-494-G-1

- - - - - - - - - -

February 21, 2002

Before JOLLY, JONES, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Todd William Gay, federal prisoner # 23676-077, appeals the

district court’s denial of his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) motion to

reduce his sentence based on Amendment 599 to U.S.S.G. § 2K2.4

(relating to use of a firearm in relation to a crime of

violence). Gay argues that the five-year consecutive sentence he

received for his conviction under 18 U.S.C. § 924(c), and the

presentence report’s five-level enhancement pursuant to U.S.S.G.

§ 2B3.1(b)(2)(C) for brandishing a firearm, resulted in double

counting.
No. 01-10484 

-2-

Because the weapon enhancement applied only to the February

bank robbery, which was not the basis for the 18 U.S.C. § 924(c)

conviction, there was no double counting/Amendment 599 violation. 

See U.S.S.G. § 2K2.4, comment. (n.2). 

AFFIRMED.
63.0

70.4

65.1

63.1 64.5 

0

102030405060708090

100

Agriculture, forestry, 

fishing and hunting

Construction Information Professional, scientific, 

and technical services

Administrativ

support and w

managemen

remediation se

Percent of respondent firms that were home-based

NAICS sectors

Home-Based Businesses in Selected Industries: 

(Total reporting 

firms: 130,914)

(Total reporting 

firms: 1,698,721)

(Total reporting 

firms: 211,569) (Total reporting 

firms: 2,355,721)

(Total repor

firms: 954,0

Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 2007 Survey of Business Owners – Released June 14, 2011
# CA2014019EN.01000101.xml

| 22.1.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CA 19/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.1.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CA 19/1

---

Cancellation notice

(2014/C 19 A/01)

The European Medicines Agency has decided to cancel the following selection procedures:

| — | EMA/CA/S/039: Contract Staff (short-term), Scientific Support to the European Surveillance of Veterinary Antimicrobial Consumption (ESVAC) (FG IV) (1), |
| --- | --- |

—

EMA/CA/S/039: Contract Staff (short-term), Scientific Support to the European Surveillance of Veterinary Antimicrobial Consumption (ESVAC) (FG IV) (1),

EMA/CA/S/039: Contract Staff (short-term), Scientific Support to the European Surveillance of Veterinary Antimicrobial Consumption (ESVAC) (FG IV) (1

| — | EMA/CA/S/040: Contract Staff (short-term), Scientific Secretariat to the European Commission Opinions on Antimicrobial Resistance, Veterinary Medicines Department (FG IV) (2). |
| --- | --- |

—

EMA/CA/S/040: Contract Staff (short-term), Scientific Secretariat to the European Commission Opinions on Antimicrobial Resistance, Veterinary Medicines Department (FG IV) (2).

EMA/CA/S/040: Contract Staff (short-term), Scientific Secretariat to the European Commission Opinions on Antimicrobial Resistance, Veterinary Medicines Department (FG IV) (2

---

(1)  OJ C 320 A, 6.11.2013, p. 2.

1

(2)  See footnote 1.

2

---
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 2869

To extend until December 31, 1998, the temporary suspension of duties

on 2,6-Dichlorobenzonitrile, relating to mixtures and inerts.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

AUGUST 4, 1993

Mrs. JOHNSON of Connecticut (by request) introduced the following bill; which

was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

A BILL

To extend until December 31, 1998, the temporary suspension of duties on 2,6-Dichlorobenzonitrile, relating to

mixtures and inerts.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF TEMPORARY SUSPENSION OF

4 DUTIES ON 2,6-DICHLOROBENZONITRILE RE5 LATING TO MIXTURES AND INERTS.

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.38.14 of the Har7 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended

8 by striking ‘‘12/31/92’’ and inserting ‘‘12/31/98’’.

9 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—
2

HR 2869 IH

1 (1) IN GENERAL.—The amendment made by

2 subsection (a) applies with respect to goods entered,

3 or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on

4 or after the fifteenth day after the date of the enact5 ment of this Act.

6 (2) RELIQUIDATION.—Notwithstanding section

7 514 of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1514) or

8 any other provision of law, upon proper request filed

9 with the appropriate customs officer on or before the

10 date which is ninety days after the date of enact11 ment of this Act, any entry, or withdrawal from

12 warehouse for consumption, of an article described

13 in heading 9902.38.14 of the Harmonized Tariff

14 Schedule of the United States that was made—

15 (A) after December 31, 1992, and

16 (B) before the fifteenth day after the date

17 of enactment of this Act;

18 shall be liquidated or reliquidated as though such

19 entry or withdrawal occurred on the date that is fif20 teen days after the date of the enactment of this

21 Act.

Æ
#### STATE of Florida, Appellant, v. William STEINMETZ and Ronald Hansen, Appellees.

No. 76-1863.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Sept. 27, 1977.

Michael J. Satz, Assigned State Atty., and Linda De Bene, Asst. State Atty., Fort Lauderdale, for appellant.

Lawrence E. Hoffman, Miami Beach, Martin Blitstein and Ross Rosenberg, Miami, for appellees.

Before PEARSON, NATHAN and HUB-BART, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Reversed and remanded for further proceedings based on the following authorities: *Austin v. State ex rel. Christian,*310 So.2d 289, 290-91 (Fla.1975); *Hart v. State,*144 Fla. 409, 198 So. 120 (1940); *State v. Viscito,*349 So.2d 196 (Fla. 3d DCA 1977); *Carey v. State,*349 So.2d 820 (Fla. 3d DCA 1977).
U.S. flag
              An official website of the United States government Skip to main content   end of header Census.gov Newsroom Releases Governments
 Newsroom Archive
 Skip left menu navigation
 About the Newsroom
 				Facts for Features
 				**News Releases**
 				Press Kits
 				Tip Sheets
 Release Information CB11-TPS.52 **Contact:**  Public Information Office
301-763-3030/763-3762 (fax)
 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:  WEDNESDAY, DEC. 28, 2011 Finances of Selected State and Local Government Employee Retirement Systems: 3rd Quarter 2011 This quarterly survey provides national summary statistics on the revenues, expenditures and composition of assets of the 100 largest state and local public employee retirement systems in the United States. These 100 systems comprise 89.4 percent of financial activity among such entities, based on the 2007 Census of Governments. This survey presents the most current statistics about investment decisions by state and local public employee retirement systems, which are among the largest types of institutional investors in the U.S. financial markets. These statistical tables are published three months after each calendar quarter and show national financial transactions and trends for the past five years. Internet address:  
<https://www.census.gov/govs/qpr/>. **No news release associated with this report. Tip Sheet only.**
  CONNECT WITH US

Information Quality
                    Data Linkage Infrastructure
                    Data Protection and Privacy Policy
                    Accessibility      
                    FOIA
                    Inspector General
                    No FEAR Act
                    U.S. Department of Commerce
                    USA.gov
                   Measuring America's People, Places, and Economy
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3304 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3304

     To amend the Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act to allow State 
           disapproval of Federal offshore leasing decisions.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 19, 1993

 Mr. Cox (for himself, Mr. Johnston of Florida, Mr. Goss, Mr. Ravenel, 
 and Mr. Zimmer) introduced the following bill; which was referred to 
                   the Committee on Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
     To amend the Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act to allow State 
           disapproval of Federal offshore leasing decisions.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled, That section 19(d) of 
the Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act (43 U.S.C. 1345(d)) is amended to 
read as follows:
    ``(d) Any decision by the Secretary to approve a proposed lease 
sale under section 8, a proposed exploration plan under section 
11(c)(1), or a proposed development and production plan under section 
25(h)(1) shall be transmitted to the Governor of each affected State, 
and shall not become effective until the passage of--
            ``(1) in the case of a State that permits action under this 
        subsection by initiative, such time as the State by law shall 
        prescribe, not to exceed 2 years; or
            ``(2) in all other cases, 6 months,
after such transmittal without such affected State, under appropriate 
provisions of State law, acting to disapprove such decision.''.

                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUL-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             AUG-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUL-31-2000
<CASH>                                          43,154
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  117,242
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,749
<INVENTORY>                                      5,055
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               176,076
<PP&E>                                         409,284
<DEPRECIATION>                                 262,706
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 611,808
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           83,132
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           251
<OTHER-SE>                                     382,693
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   611,808
<SALES>                                        353,079
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               353,079
<CGS>                                          232,366
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  232,366
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               109,039
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              14,123
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 12,365
<INCOME-TAX>                                     5,006
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              6,668
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  (187)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     6,481
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .25
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .25


</TABLE>
LIST OF EXHIBITS

A - North Shore and South Shore Routes (p. 2; Endnote 10)

B - Email from James D. Harmon, Jr. to Kenneth Ready dated July 13, 2016 (p. 7; Endnote 41)

C - East Hampton Vector Helicopter Tracks Covering July and August 2016 (p. 10)

D - Complaints by Town (October 30, 2014) (p. 10; Endnote 60)

E - FAA PDARS graphics dated July 15, August 4, 7 and 8, 2016 (p. 10; Endnote 61)

F - PDARS tracks from July 1 and July 4, 2016 (p. 12)

G - East Hampton HTO Vector Helicopter Tr acking Graphics dated July 1 and 4, 2016 (p. 12; Endnote 70)

H - East Hampton HTO Helicopter Complaint “Heat Map” (March 18, 2016) (p. 10; Endnote 63)

I - Noise Abatement Compliance Report, Complaint Maps (July and August 2016) (p. 10; Endnote 63)

J - ERHC, East Hampton Airport Nois e Abatement Plan, 2016 Routes, p. 4 (2016) (p. 13; Endnote 79)

### EXHIBIT H61Helicopter Complaint Density(Based on complainant identification of aircraft type)

### EXHIBIT I

# Noise Abatement Compliance Report: July 1 st 

# – 5 th 

# 2016

Prepared for weekly meeting with EHRC, Sound Aircraft Services, and ATCT

Prepared By: PM 7/6/2016 

### Complaint Map

# Noise Abatement Compliance Report: July 8 th 

# – 11 th 

# 2016

Prepared for weekly meeting with EHRC, Sound Aircraft Services, and ATCT

Prepared By: PM 7/12/2016 Curfew Violations

Total: 4



### Complaint Map

# Noise Abatement Compliance Report: July 15 th 

# – 18 th 

# 2016

Prepared for weekly meeting with EHRC, Sound Aircraft Services, and ATCT

Prepared By: PM 7/19/2016 Curfew Violations

Total: 4



### Complaint Map

# Noise Abatement Compliance Report: July 22 nd 

# – 25 th 

# 2016

Prepared for weekly meeting with EHRC, Sound Aircraft Services, and ATCT

Prepared By: PM 7/26/2016 Curfew Violations

Total: 4



### Complaint Map

# Noise Abatement Compliance Report: July 29 th 

# – August 1 st 

# 2016

Prepared for weekly meeting with EHRC, Sound Aircraft Services, and ATCT

Prepared By: PM 8/2/2016 Curfew Violations

Total: 1



### Complaint Map

# Noise Abatement Compliance Report: August 5 th 

# – August 8 th 

# 2016

Prepared for weekly meeting with EHRC, Sound Aircraft Services, and ATCT

Prepared By: PM 8/9/2016 

### Complaint Map

# Noise Abatement Compliance Report: August 12 th 

# – August 15 th 

# 2016

Prepared for weekly meeting with EHRC, Sound Aircraft Services, and ATCT

Prepared By: PM 8/16/2016 Curfew Violations

Total: 0



### Complaint Map

# Noise Abatement Compliance Report: August 19 th 

# – August 22 nd 

# 2016

Prepared for weekly meeting with EHRC, Sound Aircraft Services, and ATCT

Prepared By: MC 8/23/2016 

### Complaint Map

# Noise Abatement Compliance Report: August 26 th 

# – August 29 nd 

# 2016

Prepared for weekly meeting with EHRC, Sound Aircraft Services, and ATCT

Prepared By: MC 8/30/2016 Curfew Violations

Total: 3

### EXHIBIT J

# 2016 Routes

DRAFT Original 4