alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2013379EN.01000801.xml

| 28.12.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 379/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.12.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 379/8

---

New national side of euro coins intended for circulation

(2013/C 379/10)

Image

National side of the new commemorative 2-euro coin intended for circulation and issued by the Netherlands

National side of the new commemorative 2-euro coin intended for circulation and issued by the Netherlands

Euro coins intended for circulation have legal tender status throughout the euro area. For the purpose of informing the public and all parties who handle the coins, the Commission publishes a description of the designs of all new coins (1). In accordance with the Council conclusions of 10 February 2009 (2), euro-area Member States and countries that have concluded a monetary agreement with the European Union providing for the issuing of euro coins are allowed to issue commemorative euro coins intended for circulation, provided that certain conditions are met, particularly that only the 2-euro denomination is used. These coins have the same technical characteristics as other 2-euro coins, but their national face features a commemorative design that is highly symbolic in national or European terms.

1

2

Issuing country: The Netherlands

Issuing country

Subject of commemoration: 200 years Kingdom of the Netherlands

Subject of commemoration

Description of the design: The inner part of the design shows a continuing ribbon that starts from the outside depicting the effigy of King Willem-Alexander and continues to depict the effigies of his six predecessors: Queen Beatrix, Queen Juliana, Queen Wilhelmina, King Willem III, King Willem II and King Willem I. The effigies are surrounded by the inscription ‘Willem-Alexander Koning der Nederlanden’ followed by the Royal Dutch mintmark, the mint master mark, the year 2013, the initials of the designer and at the left side of the effigies the inscription ‘200 jaar Koninkrijk der Nederlanden’.

Description of the design

The coin’s outer ring depicts the 12 stars of the European flag.

Number of coins to be issued: 3,5 million

Number of coins to be issued

Date of issue: November 2013

Date of issue

---

(1)  See OJ C 373, 28.12.2001, p. 1 for the national faces of all the coins issued in 2002.

1

(2)  See the conclusions of the Economic and Financial Affairs Council of 10 February 2009 and the Commission Recommendation of 19 December 2008 on common guidelines for the national sides and the issuance of euro coins intended for circulation (OJ L 9, 14.1.2009, p. 52).

2

---
<PAGE>


                                                                   EXHIBIT 11.2

                       DONALDSON, LUFKIN & JENRETTE, INC.
             SCHEDULE OF COMPUTATION OF WEIGHTED AVERAGE NUMBER OF
             COMMON SHARES AND COMMON SHARE EQUIVALENTS OUTSTANDING
               AND DILUTED EARNINGS PER SHARE FOR THE YEARS ENDED
                        DECEMBER 31, 1997, 1996 AND 1995



<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                            Years Ended December 31,

                                                                    1997             1996            1995
                                                                    ----             ----            ----
                                                                     (in thousands, except per share data)

<S>                                                                <C>              <C>             <C>
Weighted Average Common Shares:
    Average Common Shares Outstanding                              55,139           53,300          50,570
    Average Restricted Stock Units Outstanding                      3,543            5,152             894
    Average Common Shares Issuable Under
      Employee Benefit Plans                                        3,830              904             116
    Average Common Shares Issuable for
      Convertible Debt                                                237                -               -
                                                                 --------         --------        --------


Weighted Average Common Shares Outstanding                         62,749           59,356          51,580

Earnings:
   Net Income                                                    $408,250         $291,300        $179,100
    Less:  Preferred Stock Dividend Requirement                    12,144           18,653          19,868

    Less: Interest, net of Taxes on Convertible Debt                  308                -               -
                                                                 --------         --------        --------

Earnings Applicable to Diluted Common Shares                     $396,414         $272,647        $159,232
                                                                 ========         ========        ========

Diluted Earnings Per Common Share:                               $   6.32         $   4.59        $   3.09
                                                                 ========         ========        ========
</TABLE>












                                      84
#### Johnny MORRIS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 78-259.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Aug. 2, 1978.

Robert E. Jagger, Public Defender, and Anthony Rondolino, Asst. Public Defender, Clearwater, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and C. Marie King, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. *See DeLanie v. State,*262 So.2d 655 (Fla.1972).

GRIMES, C. J., and HOBSON and SCHEB, JJ., concur.
`[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3286 Engrossed in House (EH)]

103d CONGRESS

  1st Session

                               H. R. 3286

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

To authorize the Secretary of the Interior to lease certain properties 
             at the Presidio of San Francisco, California.






103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3286

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT


 
To authorize the Secretary of the Interior to lease certain properties 
             at the Presidio of San Francisco, California.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. LETTERMAN-LAIR COMPLEX AT PRESIDIO.

    The Secretary of the Interior is authorized to negotiate and enter 
into leases, at fair market rental and without regard to section 321 of 
chapter 314 of the Act of June 30, 1932 (40 U.S.C. 303b), for all or 
part of the Letterman-LAIR complex at the Presidio of San Francisco to 
be used for scientific, research or educational purposes. For 5 years 
from the date of enactment of this section, the proceeds from any such 
lease shall be retained by the Secretary and used for the preservation, 
restoration, operation and maintenance, improvement, repair and related 
expenses incurred with respect to Presidio properties. For purposes of 
any such lease, the Secretary may adjust the rental by taking into 
account any amounts to be expended by the lessee for preservation, 
maintenance, restoration, improvement, repair and related expenses with 
respect to the leased properties.

            Passed the House of Representatives November 15, 1993.

            Attest:






                                                                 Clerk.`
Conference Call with Tribal Environmental Professionals

February 11, 2010

Meeting Note to the Docket

Discussion Topics

On February 11, 2010, representatives from the US Environmental Protection Agency 

(EPA) participated in a meeting to update interested members from the National Tribal 

Air Association (NTAA) on the status of the rule titled: “Review of New Sources and 

Modifications in Indian Country.” The attendees discussed the: 

• Proposed schedule for finalizing the rule
# C_2014408EN.01001301.xml

| 15.11.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 408/13 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.11.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 408/13

---

EUROPEAN MONITORING CENTRE FOR DRUGS AND DRUG ADDICTION

Publication of the final accounts for the financial year 2013

2014/C 408/13

The complete version of the final accounts may be found at the following address:

http://www.emcdda.europa.eu/html.cfm/index230495EN.html

---
Exhibit 32.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of Congoleum Corporation (the "Company") on
Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Roger S. Marcus,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350,
as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the
best of my knowledge:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.


March 24, 2005


/s/ Roger S. Marcus
---------------------
Roger S. Marcus
Chief Executive Officer


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Congoleum Corporation and will be retained by Congoleum Corporation
and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.

This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of ss.
18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
Exhibit 10.1

 

AMENDMENT TO

THE EMPIRE DISTRICT ELECTRIC COMPANY

SUPPLEMENTAL EXECUTIVE RETIREMENT PLAN

 

Reference is made to The Empire District Electric Company Supplemental Retirement Plan (the “Plan”) originally adopted by The Empire District Electric Company (the “Employer”) effective as of January 1, 1994 and most recently amended and restated effective as of January 1, 2014.

 

Section 3.1(a) of the Plan is hereby amended, effective as of January 1, 2002, to read in its entirety as follows:

 

(a)         Benefit Amount. If at any time any benefit otherwise payable under the provisions of the Retirement Plan with respect to a Participant, including any benefit payable to a Participant’s spouse or other beneficiary, shall be reduced by reason of the limitations on maximum benefits imposed under Section 415(b) of the Code and/or the limitation on the amount of compensation that may be considered under Section 401(a) (17) of the Code, the Participant, or the Participant’s spouse or other beneficiary, shall be entitled to receive a benefit under this Plan (an “Accrued Benefit”) equal to the excess, if any, of

 

(1)                                 The amount of the benefit under the Retirement Plan, calculated without regard to the limitations imposed by Sections 415 and 401(a)(17) of the Code and with any amounts deferred by the Participant under an Employer-sponsored deferred compensation plan treated as compensation for purposes of this determination, over

 

(2)                                 The amount of the benefit under the Retirement Plan as limited by Sections 401(a)(17) and 415 of the Code.

 

This amendment shall cease to be effective, if, prior to the date that the merger (the “Merger”) of Liberty Sub Corp. with and into the Employer is consummated, the Board of Directors of the Employer revokes this amendment.

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Employer has caused this amendment of the Plan to be executed on its behalf this 14th day of November, 2016, but to be effective as of January 1, 2002.

 

	
 
    	
THE EMPIRE DISTRICT ELECTRIC   COMPANY
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
By:
    	
/s/ Bradley Beecher
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
Name: Bradley Beecher
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
Title: President and   CEO
No. 00-7336.

#### Williams *v.*McCord.

C. A. 4th Cir. Certio-rari denied.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Friday Addison, Appellant.

[738 NYS2d 580]

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (West, J.), rendered November 5, 1999, convicting him of manslaughter in the second degree, upon.a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

*453Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant’s contention that the evidence was legally insufficient to support his conviction of manslaughter in the second degree under a theory of accomplice liability *(see,*Penal Law § 125.15 [1]; § 20.00) is unpreserved for appellate review *(see,*CPL 470.05 [2]; *People v Gray,*86 NY2d 10). In any event, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution *(see, People v Contes,*60 NY2d 620), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence *(see,*CPL 470.15 [5]).

The defendant’s remaining contentions are either unpreserved for appellate review or without merit. Altman, J.P., Adams, Townes and Prudenti, JJ., concur.
#### CORBIN TRUCKING COMPANY, INC., Petitioner, v. STEWART TITLE GUARANTY COMPANY, Respondent.

No. 43579.

Supreme Court of Florida.

May 21, 1973.

Certiorari denied. #189 Fla.App. (73).

ROBERTS, Acting C. J., and ERVIN, ADKINS, BOYD and McCAIN, JJ., concur.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano 

Richard H. Bernstein, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 August 21, 2015

a0818

Order 

Clerk

August 21, 2015

152098

In re BARTLETT, Minors. SC: 152098

COA: 323962

Allegan CC Family Division:

13-051776-NA

_____________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the May 14, 2015 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
#### Johnnie Carl LLOYD, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 68-36.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Second District.

Sept. 20, 1968.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
ACCOMPANYING CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF DATAMETRICS
CORPORATION AS OF AND FOR THE TWELVE MONTH PERIOD ENDING OCTOBER 26, 1997 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-27-1996
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          OCT-26-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-26-1997
<CASH>                                             200
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    2,923
<ALLOWANCES>                                        48
<INVENTORY>                                      5,996
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 9,244
<PP&E>                                           5,849
<DEPRECIATION>                                   4,618
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  11,546
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            7,005
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           133
<OTHER-SE>                                      34,177
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    11,546
<SALES>                                         16,797
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                16,797
<CGS>                                           13,401
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   13,401
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 6,013
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 474
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (3,091)
<INCOME-TAX>                                        10
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (3,101)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (3,101)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  ($0.24)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  ($0.24)
        

</TABLE>
#### Irene Maxcy WELLS, Petitioner, v. The STATE of Florida, Respondent.

No. 43319.

Supreme Court of Florida.

March 22, 1973.

Rehearing Denied May 30, 1973.

Certiorari denied. 270 So.2d 399.

CARLTON, C. J., and ROBERTS, ERVIN, ADKINS and BOYD, JJ., concur.

McCAIN and DEKLE, JJ., dissent.
<PAGE>

                           DONALDSON, LUFKIN & JENRETTE, INC.
            STATEMENT RE COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
                              AND PREFERRED DIVIDENDS

                                                       For the Years Ended
                                                --------------------------------
                                                  1994        1995       1996
                                                ----------  ---------- ---------
Earnings:
     Income before provision for
       income taxes                            $  205,000  $  298,500 $  473,800

Add: Fixed Charges
       Interest(gross)                          2,116,655   2,699,769  2,865,800

       Interest factor in rents                    18,565      22,064     25,515
                                                ----------  ---------- ---------
       Total fixed charges                      2,135,220   2,721,833  2,891,315
                
Add: Preferred dividends                           20,970      19,868     18,653

     Combined fixed charges and preferred
       dividends                                2,156,190   2,741,701  2,909,968

Earnings before fixed charges, preferred
  dividends and provision for income taxes     $2,340,220  $3,020,333 $3,365,115
                                               ==========  ========== ==========
Ratio of earnings to fixed charges
  and preferred dividends                            1.09        1.10       1.16
                                               ==========  ========== ==========


<PAGE>


           STATEMENT RE COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

				     	               FISCAL YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
     				    -----------------------------------------------------------
				       1992        1993         1994	  1995       1996
                                    ----------  ----------   ----------- ----------  -----------
<S>                                  <C>           <C>        <C>           <C>        <C>
Earnings:
  Income before provision for
    income taxes                    $  245,000  $  302,000   $  205,000  $  298,500  $  473,800

Add: Fixed Charges
     Interest expense (gross)        1,130,709   1,465,303    2,116,655   2,699,769   2,865,800

       Interest factor in rents         13,899      15,432       18,565      22,064      25,515
                                    ----------  ----------   ----------- ----------  -----------
       Total fixed charges           1,144,608   1,480,735    2,135,220   2,721,833   2,891,315

Earnings before fixed charges,
  and provision for income taxes    $1,389,608  $1,782,735   $2,340,220  $3,020,333  $3,365,115
                                    ==========  ==========   ==========  ==========  ==========
Ratio of earnings to fixed charges        1.21        1.20         1.10        1.11        1.16
                                    ==========  ==========   ==========  ==========  ==========

</TABLE>
#### Ury Gertsenstein, Appellant, *v.*Peninsular & Oriental Steam Navigation Co., Respondent.

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department,

May 14, 1953.

*Norman Coplan*and *Philip Weinstein*for appellant.

*Leonard 8. Leaman*for respondent.

Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements.

Concur: Hoestadter, Edbr and Schreiber, JJ.
# C_2014222EN.01000201.xml

| 12.7.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 222/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.7.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 222/2

---

Notice for the attention of the persons subject to the restrictive measures provided for in Council Decision 2014/145/CFSP, as amended by Council Decision 2014/455/CFSP, and in Council Regulation (EU) No 269/2014 as implemented by Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 753/2014 concerning restrictive measures in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine

2014/C 222/03

The following information is brought to the attention of the persons that appear in the Annex to Council Decision 2014/145/CFSP (1), as amended by Council Decision 2014/455/CFSP (2), and in Annex I to Council Regulation (EU) No 269/2014 (3), as implemented by Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 753/2014 (4) concerning restrictive measures in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine.

1

2

3

4

The Council of the European Union has decided that the persons that appear in the above-mentioned Annexes should be included in the list of persons and entities subject to restrictive measures provided for in Council Decision 2014/145/CFSP and in Council Regulation (EU) No 269/2014 concerning restrictive measures in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine. The grounds for designations of those persons appear in the relevant entries in those Annexes.

The attention of the persons concerned is drawn to the possibility of making an application to the competent authorities of the relevant Member State(s) as indicated in the web sites in Annex II to Council Regulation (EU) No 269/2014, in order to obtain an authorisation to use frozen funds for basic needs or specific payments (cf. Article 4 of the Regulation).

The persons concerned may submit a request to the Council, together with supporting documentation, that the decision to include them on the above-mentioned list should be reconsidered, to the following address:

| Council of the European Union |
| --- |
| General Secretariat |
| DG C 1C |
| Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175 |
| 1048 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |
| E-mail: sanctions@consilium.europa.eu. |

Council of the European Union

General Secretariat

DG C 1C

Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175

1048 Bruxelles/Brussel

BELGIQUE/BELGIË

E-mail: sanctions@consilium.europa.eu.

The attention of the persons concerned is also drawn to the possibility of challenging the Council’s decision before the General Court of the European Union, in accordance with the conditions laid down in Article 275, 2nd paragraph, and Article 263, 4th and 6th paragraphs, of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union.

---

(1)  OJ L 78, 17.3.2014, p. 16.

1

(2)  OJ L 205, 12.7.2014, p. 25.

2

(3)  OJ L 78, 17.3.2014, p. 6.

3

(4)  OJ L 205, 12.7.2014, p. 7.

4

---