alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
## ScottE. Sayre 7750 Tecumseh Trail Cincinnati, Ohio 45243 Email: t34pilot@cinci.rr.com Cell: 513-315-9333 6/9/2015 US Department ofTransportation, Docket Operations WestBuilding, Ground Floor, RoomW12-140 1200 NewJersey Avenue, SE Washington, DC 20590

RE: Request for Exemption

DearFolks, Via Certified Receipt Mail **~··:** i .

I am a "person" and herebyrequest an exemption to 14CFR, Federal Aviation Regulation 91.881, civil subsonicjet airplanes weighing 75,000 pounds or less. This regulation is inregard to stage 3 noise compliance. Effective date December 31, 2015. I amtype rated in a Morane SaulnierMS-760 airplane. I fly several ofthese aircraft. I hold an Airline Transport Pilot certificate# 2123029. In the docket for rule making for this regulatory change, this make and model was excluded from the FAA analysis. The docket number is FAA-2013-0503; Arndt. No. 91.328. This make and model airplane has a gross weight of8,750 pounds and thereby is a small aircraft, under 12,500 pounds. This aircraft is a twin enginejetpowered airplane. This airplane was certified in the United States July 1958. Type Certificate number 7A3. This airplane is clearly listed inFAAAdvisory Circular 36-3H. change 1, dated 5/25/2012, Estimated Airplane Noise Levels inAWeighed Decibels. The dataprovided in this AC was providedbyDGAC (French Aviation Authority) as noted in the AC. The noise levels are within the stage 3 noise compliance requirements. The operation ofthese aircraft will notbe in any conflict with stage 3 noise regulations. The FAA Approved Airplane FlightManual does not contain dataregarding Stage 3 compliance. The present flight manual is dated April1963. This exemptionhas no effect on safety. This airplane is the first VeryLightJet (VLJ) and has historical roots. These airplanes operate for personal transportation oftheir respective owners and also are frequently taken to "Airshows" for displayto the general public. Thisnewregulation takes effect December 31, 2015. Exemption to this regulation is neededbefore this date to allow for recurrent training and normal operations ofthese airplanes in the National Airspace System. Summary: An Exemption is hereby granted to Scott E. Sayre, holder ofAirline TransportPilotcertificate 2123029 to operate Morane Saulnier MS-760 series aircraftto and from any suitable airports in the contiguous United States. Thank you for your assistance in this matter.
#### CARROLL CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, Inc. and United States Fidelity and Guaranty Company, both corporations, Petitioners, v. Luther H. PUGH, Jr. and the Florida Industrial Commission, Respondents.

No. 36956.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Feb. 21, 1968.

J. Nixon Daniel, Jr., and Beggs, Lane, Daniel, Gaines & Davis, Pensacola, for petitioners.

*277Jack S. Graff, of Levin, Askew, War-field, Levin & Graff, Pensacola, Patrick H. Mears, Tallahassee, and J. Franklin Garner, Lakeland, for respondents.

PER CURIAM.

By petition for a writ of certiorari *yvt*have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission bearing date October 24, 1967.

We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 32 F.S.A.

Our consideration of the petition, the record and briefs leads us to conclude that there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law.

The petition is therefore denied.

It is so ordered.

CALDWELL, C. J., and ROBERTS, DREW, ERVIN and ADAMS, JJ., concur.
**EXHIBIT 31.2**

**CERTIFICATION**

I, Kirk A. Waldron,Chief Financial Officer of SMTEK International, Inc., certify that:

1.     I havereviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the annual report on Form 10-K/Aof SMTEK International, Inc.;

2.     Based on my knowledge, this report does notcontain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a materialfact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances underwhich such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;
| Date: October 22, 2004 |
|-----------------------------|
| By:                         | /s/ Kirk A. Waldron |   |
|                        | Kirk A. Waldron |
|                        | *Chief Financial Officer* |
|                        | SMTEK International, Inc. |

 

16

----
Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h

Elizabeth A. Weave r

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathaway,

J ustices 

# Order

June 11, 2010

140296

GREGORY J. BOWENS, PAULA M. BRIDGES, and GARY A. BROWN, Plaintiffs-Appellees, and

ROBERT B. DUNLAP and PHILLIP A. TALBERT, Plaintiffs, v SC: 140296 COA: 282711 Wayne CC: 02-233251-CZ ARY, INC., d/b/a AFTERMATH ENTERTAINMENT, PHILLIP J. ATWELL, CHRONIC 2001 TOURING, INC., GERONIMO FI LM PRODUCTIONS, INC., and ANDRE YOUNG, Defendants-Appellants, and

AMAZON.COM, INC., AOL TIME WARNER, INC., BARNES & NOBLE , INC., BARNES & NOBLE.COM, INC., BE ST BUY COMPANY, INC., BLOCKBUSTER, IN C., BORDERS GROUP, INC., CDNOW, INC., JOHN DOE #1, JOHN DOE #2, EAGLE ROCK ENTERTAINMENT, EAGLE VISION, INC., HARMONY HOUSE RECO RDS & TAPES, HASTINGS ENTERTAINMENT, INC., HMV MEDIA GROUP, HONIGMAN MILLER SCHWARTZ & COHN, L.L.P., HOUSE OF BLUES CONCERTS/HEWITT/SILVA, L.L.C., INGRAM ENTERTAINMENT HOLDINGS, INTERSCOPE RECORDS, INC., ERVIN JOHNSON, MAGIC JO HNSON PRODUCTIONS, L.L.C., METROPOLITAN ENTERTAINMENT GROUP, INC., MGA, INC., MOVIE GALLERY.COM, INC., MTS, INC/TOWER RECORDS, THE MUSICL AND GROUP, INC., PANAVISION, INC., RADIO EVENTS GROUP, INC., RED DISTRIBUTION, INC., PHIL ROBINSON, WILLIAM SILVA, TRANS WORLDI, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk June 11, 2010

p0608 2

ENTERTAINMENT CORPOR ATION, KIRDIS TUCKER, WHEREHOUSE ENTERTAINMENT, INC., and WH SMITH, P.L.C., Defendants.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application fo r leave to appeal the September 24, 2009 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is GRANTED. The parties shall include among the issues to be briefed: (1 ) whether, as a matter of law, the videotaped conversation in question was a “private conver sation” or “private discourse” for purposes of the eavesdropping st atutes, MCL 750.539a, et seq .; and (2) whethe r, and under what circumstances, a public-official- or police-pl aintiff possesses a reasonable expectation of privacy under MCL 750.5 39c in conversations with private citizens in pursuit of official business in enforcing state or local laws and ordinances.
Exhibit 32.1








CERTIFICATION OF THE PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER


PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the annual report of DGT Holdings Corp., (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ended July 30, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, John J. Quicke, Principal Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:





1.
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and








2.
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








September 26, 2011

/s/ John J. QuickeName:
John J. QuickeTitle:
President and Chief Executive Officer

(Principal Executive Officer)
## In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

No. 02

- 23

- 00031

- CR

D AVID R

IOS

, Appellant

V

.

T HE S TATE OF T EXAS §

§

§

§

§ On A ppeal from the 371st District

Court

of Tarrant County ( 1672755D )

November 30, 2023

Memorandum Opinion by Chief Justice

Sudderth

(nfp)

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that there

was error in the tr ial co urt’s judgment. The judgment is modified to reflect that Rios

pleaded “ not true

. ” Further, although the trial court ’ s judgment states that the trial

court found allegations 1

– 6 and 7 (a) true, the record reflects that the tri al court found

allegatio ns 1

– 6, 7(

b), and 7(c)

— but not 7(a)

— true

, we likewise correct this portion of

the judgment

. It is ordered that the judgment of the trial court is affirmed as

modified.SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

By /s/ Bonnie Sudderth

Chief Ju stice Bonnie Sudderth
Exhibit 5.2

[Karr-Tuttle-Campbell Letterhead]

August 23, 2000

Merrill
Corporation
One Merrill Circle
St. Paul, Minnesota 55108

| | RE: |  | Registration Statement on Form S-1
| | --- |  | ----------------------------------

Ladies and Gentlemen:

We
have acted as special counsel to FMC Resource Management Corporation, a Washington corporation ("FMC"), one of the subsidiary guarantors of Merrill Corporation, a Minnesota
corporation (the "Company"). FMC is named as an additional registrant in the Registration Statement on Form S-1 (the "Registration Statement") filed by the Company and its
guarantors with the Securities and Exchange Commission, with respect to the registration by the Company and the guarantors of the resale of up to $15,157,000 aggregate principal amount of the
Company's 12% Series A Senior Subordinated Notes due 2009 (the "Notes") and the guarantees by the Guarantors (the "Subsidiary Guarantees"), including the guaranty by FMC (the "FMC Subsidiary
Guaranty"), on behalf of a certain selling noteholder named therein (the "Selling Noteholder"), which Notes and Subsidiary Guarantees may be offered for resale by the Selling Noteholder from time to
time as described in the Registration Statement.

In
acting as special counsel for FMC and arriving at the opinion expressed below, we have examined and relied upon such records, documents and other instruments as, in our judgment,
are necessary or appropriate in order to express the opinion hereinafter set forth. We have assumed the genuineness of all signatures, the authenticity of all documents submitted to us copies of
originals, and the conformity to original documents of all documents submitted to us as facsimile or photostatic copies.

Based
upon and subject to the foregoing, we are of the opinion that the FMC Subsidiary Guaranty being registered for resale with the Notes by the Selling Noteholder under the
Registration Statement has been duly authorized, executed and delivered.

We
express no opinion herein other than the laws of the State of Washington and the federal laws of the United States.

We
hereby consent to the filing of this opinion as Exhibit 5.1 to the Registration Statement, to its use as part of the Registration Statement, and to the use of our name under
the caption "Legal Matters" in the prospectus constituting a part of the Registration Statement.

| |  | Very truly yours,                                       
| |  | --------------------------------------------------------
| |  | KARR TUTTLE CAMPBELL,
A Professional Service Corporation
| |  | /s/ Karr Tuttle Campbell                                

| |  | By: |  | /s/DIANA K. CAREYDiana K. Carey, Authorized Agent
| |  | --- |  | -------------------------------------------------

---
<PAGE>

                                                                      Exhibit 23



REPORT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS ON FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES



To the Board of Directors of Culbro Corporation


    Our audits of the consolidated financial statements referred to in our 
report dated January 28, 1997, appearing in the 1996 Annual Report to 
Shareholders of Culbro Corporation (which report and consolidated financial 
statements are incorporated by reference in this Annual Report on Form 10K) 
also included an audit of the Financial Statement Schedules listed in Item 
14(a) of this Form 10-K. In our opinion, these Financial Statement Schedules 
present fairly, in all material respects, the information set forth therein 
when read in conjunction with the related consolidated financial statements.

/s/ Price Waterhouse

PRICE WATERHOUSE LLP

New York, New York
January 28, 1997








                          CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS



    We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statement on Form S-8 (No. 2 - 94202) of Culbro Corporation of our report dated
January 28, 1997 appearing in the 1996 Annual Report to Shareholders which is
incorporated in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.  We also consent to the
incorporation by reference of our report on the Financial Statement Schedules
which appears above.



/s/ Price Waterhouse

PRICE WATERHOUSE LLP

New York, New York
March 12,  1997
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAY-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JUN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               FEB-28-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                          176821
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    45472
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      43317
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                270856
<PP&E>                                           39411
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  337157
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            42590
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             1
<OTHER-SE>                                      293719
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    337157
<SALES>                                         152818
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                158754
<CGS>                                            90941
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   140127
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                (3851)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  22478
<INCOME-TAX>                                      7966
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              18320
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     18320
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.25
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.19
        

</TABLE>
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 3098

To amend title 18, United States Code, to prohibit the possession of a

handgun or handgun ammunition by, or the private transfer of a handgun or handgun ammunition to, a juvenile.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

SEPTEMBER 21, 1993

Mr. GLICKMAN (for himself and Mr. CASTLE) introduced the following bill;

which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

A BILL

To amend title 18, United States Code, to prohibit the possession of a handgun or handgun ammunition by, or

the private transfer of a handgun or handgun ammunition to, a juvenile.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Youth Handgun Safety

5 Act of 1993’’.
2

•HR 3098 IH

1 SEC. 2. PROHIBITION OF THE POSSESSION OF A HANDGUN

2 OR HANDGUN AMMUNITION BY, OR THE PRI3 VATE TRANSFER OF A HANDGUN OR HAND4 GUN AMMUNITION TO, A JUVENILE.

5 (a) DEFINITION.—Section 921(a) of title 18, United

6 States Code, is amended by adding at the end the follow7 ing:

8 ‘‘(29) The term ‘handgun’ means—

9 ‘‘(A) a firearm that has a short stock and is de10 signed to be held and fired by the use of a single

11 hand; and

12 ‘‘(B) any combination of parts from which a

13 firearm described in subparagraph (A) can be as14 sembled.’’.

15 (b) OFFENSE.—Section 922 of such title is amended

16 by adding at the end the following:

17 ‘‘(s)(1)(A) It shall be unlawful for any person to sell,

18 deliver, or transfer to a juvenile—

19 ‘‘(i) a handgun; or

20 ‘‘(ii) ammunition that is suitable for use only in

21 a handgun.

22 ‘‘(B) Subparagraph (A) shall not apply to a transfer

23 of a handgun to a juvenile—

24 ‘‘(i) with the permission of a parent or legal

25 guardian of the juvenile;
3

•HR 3098 IH

1 ‘‘(ii) for target practice, hunting, or a course of

2 instruction in the safe use of a handgun, under the

3 supervision of an adult who is not prohibited by

4 Federal, State, or local law from possessing a fire5 arm; and

6 ‘‘(iii) in accordance with State and local law.

7 ‘‘(2)(A) It shall be unlawful for any person who is

8 a juvenile to possess—

9 ‘‘(i) a handgun; or

10 ‘‘(ii) ammunition that is suitable for use only in

11 a handgun.

12 ‘‘(B) Subparagraph (A) shall not apply to the posses13 sion of a handgun by a juvenile—

14 ‘‘(i) during target practice, hunting, or a course

15 of instruction in the safe use of a handgun, under

16 the supervision of an adult who is not prohibited by

17 Federal, State, or local law from possessing a fire18 arm; and

19 ‘‘(ii) in accordance with State and local law.

20 ‘‘(3) For purposes of this subsection, the term ‘juve21 nile’ means a person who has not attained 18 years of

22 age.’’.

23 (c) PENALTY.—Section 924(a) of such title is amend24 ed—
4

•HR 3098 IH

1 (1) in paragraph (1) by striking ‘‘paragraph (2)

2 or (3) of’’; and

3 (2) by adding at the end the following:

4 ‘‘(5) A person who knowingly violates section 922(s)

5 shall be fined not more than $1,000, imprisoned for not

6 more than 1 year, or both.’’.

Æ
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT
OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q
of Ilustrato Pictures International Inc. (the “Company”) for the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2023, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Nicolas Link, and I Krishnan Krishnamoorthy
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of
my knowledge:



|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                               
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   |                                                                                                                                                     
|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





|                           | Ilustrato Pictures International Inc. |                                                  
|-------------------------- | ------------------------------------- | -------------------------------------------------
|                           |                                       |                                                  
|Dated: August 21,
    2023 | By:                                   | /s/
    Nicolas Link                             
|                           |                                       | Nicolas Link                                     
|                           |                                       | Chief Executive Officer
    (principal executive)







| | Ilustrato
    Pictures International Inc. |                                                                      
| | ----------------------------------------- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------
| |                                           |                                                                      
| | By:                                       | /s/
    Krishnan Krishnamoorthy                                      
| |                                           | Krishnan Krishnamoorthy                                              
| |                                           | Chief Financial Officer (principal accounting, and financial officer)







This certification accompanies this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by such Act, be deemed filed by
the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”). Such certification
will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act,
except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it by reference.
<PAGE>


                                  EXHIBIT 23.2







                          INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT



We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No.
333-90891 on Form S-8 and Registration Statement Nos. 33-71798, 33-93914 and
333-37955 on Form S-3 of Dura Pharmaceuticals, Inc. of our report dated February
9, 1999, on our audit of Spiros Development Corporation II, Inc. for the year
ended December 31, 1998 and the period September 23, 1997 (date of
incorporation) through December 31, 1997, appearing in this Current Report on
Form 8-K of Dura Pharmaceuticals, Inc. to be filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on or about September 15, 2000.


/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP

San Diego, California
September 15, 2000
#### Lewis B. ROMERO, Individually and On Behalf of his minor Son, Gregory Romero, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Yvonne DENCAUSSE, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 3870.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Third Circuit.

June 19, 1972.

Caffery, Duhe & Davis by Jerry A. Oubre, Oswald A. Decuir,- New Iberia, for defendant-appellant.

Burton E. Cestia, Jr., George D. Ernest, Jr., New Iberia, Davidson, Meaux, One-bane & Donohoe by L. Lane Roy, Lafayette, for plaintiff-appellee.

Before FRUGÉ, SAVOY, and DOMEN-GEAUX, JJ.

FRUGÉ, Judge.

This is a suit arising out of an inter-sectional collision of two automobiles. Plaintiff was traveling on a through street and had the right-of-way. Defendant entered the intersection in a crossing maneuver from a fully stopped position on a side street on plaintiff’s right. The trial court determined that the accident resulted from the negligence of defendant. Defendant has appealed. We affirm that decision; there is no manifest error.

For the foregoing reasons, the judgment appealed from is affirmed. Appellant to pay all costs.

Affirmed.