## COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH NO. 02 - 14 - 00203 - CR NO. 02 - 14 - 00204 - CR NO. 02 - 14 - 00205 - CR

COURTNEY ADAM WATTS APPELLANT V. THE STATE OF TEXAS STATE

---------- FROM CRIMINAL DISTRI CT COURT NO. 2 OF TA RRANT COUNTY TRIAL COURT NO S . 1236670D, 1236671D , 1236802D

---------- 

### MEMORANDUM OPINION 1

---------- Appellant Courtney Adam Watts appeals his conviction of possession of marijuana, five pounds or less but more than four ounces, in cause number 02

- 14

- 00 203

- CR , which contain ed a third

- degree

- felony

- deadly

- weapon enhancement notice; his conviction of possession with intent to deliver a

1 See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.2

controlled substance, twenty

- eight grams or more but less than 200 grams (alprazolam), in cause number 02

- 14

- 00204

- CR, which contained a deadly weapon finding notice; and his conviction of possession with intent to deliver a controlled substance, twenty

- eight grams or more but less than 200 grams (dihydrocodeinone), in cause number 02

- 14

- 00205

- CR , which contained a deadly weapon finding notice

. See Tex. Health & Safety Code Ann. §§ 481.114 (c) , .121(b)(3) (West 2010)

. Watts made open pleas of guilty to these offenses and pleas of true to the deadly weapon allegations , and the trial court sentenced him to eight years’ confinement for each offense, to be served concurrently. See id. § 481.121(b)(3); Tex. Penal Code Ann. § § 12.33

– .34 (West 2011) , § 12 .35(c)(1) (West 2011 & Supp. 2014 ). Watts ’s court

- appointed appellate counsel has filed a motion to withdraw as counsel and a brief in support of that motion in each case that meet the requirements of Anders v. California by presenting a professional evaluation of the record demonstrating why there are no arguable grounds for relief. 386 U.S. 738, 87 S. Ct. 1396 (1967). Watts had the opportunity to fi le a pro se response but has not done so , and t h e State has not filed a brief. Once an appellant’s court

- appointed attorney files a motion to withdraw on the ground that an appeal is frivolous and fulfills the requirements of Anders , this court is obliga ted to undertake an independent examination of the record. See Stafford v. State , 813 S.W.2d 503, 511 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991); Mays v. State , 904 S.W.2d 920, 922

– 23 (Tex. App.

— Fort Worth 1995, no pet.). Only then may3

we grant counsel’s motion to withdraw. See Penson v. Ohio , 488 U.S. 75, 82

– 83, 109 S. Ct. 346, 351 (1988). We have carefully reviewed the record and counsel’s brief in each case and have determined that based on the bill of costs in each case, the trial court’s judgment requires correction wi th regard to the assessment of $344 in court
costs. We may modify the judgment in an Anders appeal and affirm the judgment as modified. Bray v. State , 179 S.W.3d 725, 726 (Tex. App.

— Fort Worth 2005, no pet.) (en banc); see Johnson v. State , 423 S.W.3d 38 5, 390 (Tex. Crim. App. 2014) (stating that we review the assessment of court costs on appeal to determine if there is a basis for the cost); see also Tex. Code Crim. Proc. Ann. art. 103.001 (West 2006 ) (“A cost is not payable by the person charged with th e cost until a written bill is produced . . . containing the items of cost, signed by the officer who charged the cost or the officer who is entitled to receive payment for the cost.”). Here, the trial court assessed $344 in court costs in each case, but t he numerical cost breakdown by the district clerk’s office supports an assessment of only $334 in each case. Therefore, we modify the trial court’s judgment and the order to withdraw funds from Watts’s inmate trust account in each case to reflect $3 3 4 in court costs. Except for the bill of costs in each case, w e agree with counsel that th ese appeal s are wholly frivolous and without merit; we find nothing in the record that might arguably support the m
. See Bledsoe v. State , 178 S.W.3d 824, 827

– 284

(Tex. C rim. App. 2005); see also Meza v. State , 206 S.W.3d 684, 685 n.6 (Tex. Crim. App. 2006). Accordingly, we grant counsel’s motion to withdraw in each

case and af firm the trial court’s judgment s as modified.

/s/ Bonnie Sudderth BONNIE SUDDERTH JUSTICE PANEL: GARDNER, WALKER , and SUDDERTH, JJ. DO NOT PUBLISH Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b) DELIVERED: May 2 8 , 2015