alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31-30**FORM 10-K CERTIFICATION**I, David E. Meador, certify that:1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of The Detroit Edison Company; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, ismade known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this report is being prepared;  b. (Intentionally omitted)  c. Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and proceduresand presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based onsuch evaluation; and  d. Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter(the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions): a. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operationof internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and  b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employeeswho have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.   /s/ DAVID E. MEADOR David E. Meador
# C_2013075EN.01000601.xml

| 14.3.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 75/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.3.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 75/6

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.6811 — Innovation Network Corporation of Japan/Renesas Electronics Corporation)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2013/C 75/02

On 5 March 2013, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32013M6811. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32013M6811. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.

---
<PAGE>   1
                                 Exhibit 11.1



                          ELANTEC SEMICONDUCTOR, INC.
                 STATEMENT RE COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS
                     (IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                 Three Months Ended       Nine Months Ended
                                                       June 30,                June 30,
                                                   ---------------         ---------------
                                                    1997     1996           1997     1996
                                                   ------   ------         ------   ------

<S>                                                <C>      <C>            <C>      <C>
Net income .....................................   $   98   $1,323         $   67   $3,657
                                                   ======   ======         ======   ======

Common and common equivalent shares outstanding:
   Common stock ................................    8,962    8,468          8,842    8,429
   Common stock options ........................      277      800            429      908
                                                   ------   ------         ------   ------
Common and common equivalent shares used in
  computing per share amounts ..................    9,239    9,448          9,271    9,337
                                                   ======   ======         ======   ======

Net income per share ...........................   $ 0.01   $ 0.14         $ 0.01   $ 0.39
                                                   ======   ======         ======   ======
</TABLE>
<PAGE>
                                                                     EXHIBIT 5.1


August 29, 2000


Pharsight Corporation
800 West El Camino Real, Suite 200
Mountain View, California  94040


Ladies and Gentlemen:

You have requested our opinion with respect to certain matters in connection
with the filing by Pharsight Corporation (the "Company") of a Registration
Statement on Form S-8 (the "Registration Statement") with the Securities and
Exchange Commission covering the offering of up to 6,932,905 shares of the
Company's Common Stock, $.001 par value, (the "Shares") pursuant to its 2000
Equity Incentive Plan, 2000 CEO Non-Qualified Stock Option Plan, 1997 Stock
Option Plan and 1995 Stock Option Plan (the "Plans").

In connection with this opinion, we have examined the Registration Statement,
your Restated and Amended Certificate of Incorporation and By-laws, as amended,
and such other documents, records, certificates, memoranda and other instruments
as we deem necessary as a basis for this opinion. We have assumed the
genuineness and authenticity of all documents submitted to us as originals, the
conformity to originals of all documents submitted to us as copies thereof, and
the due execution and delivery of all documents where due execution and delivery
are a prerequisite to the effectiveness thereof.

On the basis of the foregoing, and in reliance thereon, we are of the opinion
that the Shares, when sold and issued in accordance with the Plan, the
Registration Statement and related Prospectus, will be validly issued, fully
paid, and nonassessable (except as to shares issued pursuant to certain deferred
payment arrangements, which will be fully paid and nonassessable when such
deferred payments are made in full).

We consent to the filing of this opinion as an exhibit to the Registration
Statement.

Very truly yours,

COOLEY GODWARD LLP


By:         /s/  Brett D. White
   ------------------------------------
               Brett D. White
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3113 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3113

To authorize the Secretary of Transportation to issue a certificate of 
   documentation with appropriate endorsement for employment in the 
     coastwise trade of the United States for the vessel ENDEAVOUR.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 21, 1993

 Mrs. Johnson of Connecticut introduced the following bill; which was 
       referred to the Committee on Merchant Marine and Fisheries

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To authorize the Secretary of Transportation to issue a certificate of 
   documentation with appropriate endorsement for employment in the 
     coastwise trade of the United States for the vessel ENDEAVOUR.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled, That notwithstanding 
section 27 of the Merchant Marine Act, 1920 (46 App. U.S.C. 883), the 
Act of June 19, 1886 (46 App. U.S.C. 289), and section 12106 of title 
46, United States Code, the Secretary of Transportation may issue a 
certificate of documentation with appropriate endorsement for 
employment in the coastwise trade of the United States for the vessel 
ENDEAVOUR (United States official number 602496).

                                 <all>
```
#### Jimmy P. SPURLOCK, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 72-839.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Aug. 15, 1973.

Rehearing Denied Sept. 10, 1973.

*587James C. Dauksch, Jr., Orlando, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., Andrew W. Lindsey, Asst. Atty. Gen., and Joel Remland, Legal Intern, Tallahassee, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Defendant was convicted of buying, receiving and aiding in the concealment of stolen property. He was sentenced to three years and appeals the judgment and sentence.

The jury verdict failed to fix the value of the stolen goods and to allege defendant knew the goods were stolen.

The verdict was defective because it failed to set value. Alvarez v. State, Fla.1918, 75 Fla. 286, 78 So. 272; Vaughn v. State, Fla.1941, 147 Fla. 12, 2 So.2d 122; both cases overruled on other grounds in Tidwell v. State, Fla.1942, 151 Fla. 333, 9 So.2d 630. As defendant concedes he failed to object below to the verdict, he failed to move for a new trial, and never attacked the verdict by a proper motion in arrest of judgment so that there is no reviewable judicial act; ergo, there is no merit to defendant’s first point on appeal. Biesendorfer v. State, Fla.App.1969, 227 So.2d 322.

There is merit to defendant’s second appellate point, which challenges the failure of the judgment to recite knowledge on defendant’s part. We reverse and remand on authority of Biesendorfer v. State, supra; Eagle v. State, Fla.App.1972, 270 So.2d 468; Myers v. State, Fla.1934, 115 Fla. 627, 155 So. 797, with directions to the trial court to enter a proper judgment.

There is no merit to defendant’s third point.

Reversed and remanded, with directions.

OWEN, C. J., and WALDEN and CROSS, JJ., concur.
Certification Pursuant to
 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
 As Adopted Pursuant to
 Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
 
 In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Firsthand Technology Value Fund, Inc. (the “Company”) for the quarter ended September 30, 2012, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), Kevin Landis, as Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:
 
 (1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
  (2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
  Date: November 21, 2012
 
 /s/ Kevin Landis
 Kevin Landis
 Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
# C_2014260EN.01001001.xml

| 9.8.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 260/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.8.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 260/10

---

Summary of Commission Decisions on authorisations for the placing on the market for the use and/or for use of substances listed in Annex XIV to Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning the Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH)

(Published pursuant to Article 64(9) of Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (1))

1

2014/C 260/10

Decisions granting an authorisation

Decisions granting an authorisation

| Date of decision | Substance name | Holder of the authorisation | Authorisation number | Authorised use | Date of expiry of review period | Reasons for the decision |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 7 August 2014 | Bis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate (DEHP)
  EC No: 204-211-0
  CAS No: 117-81-7 | Rolls-Royce plc |
| PO Box 31, Derby |
| Derbyshire DE24 OBJ |
| UNITED KINGDOM |

Date of decision

Substance name

Holder of the authorisation

Authorisation number

Authorised use

Date of expiry of review period

Reasons for the decision

7 August 2014

Bis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate (DEHP)

EC No: 204-211-0

CAS No: 117-81-7

Rolls-Royce plc

PO Box 31, Derby

Derbyshire DE24 OBJ

UNITED KINGDOM

REACH/14/1/0

Processing of a stop-off formulation containing DEHP during the diffusion bonding and manufacture of aero engine fan blades

21 February 2022

| — | Risk is adequately controlled in accordance with Article 60(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006. |
| --- | --- |

—

Risk is adequately controlled in accordance with Article 60(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006.

| — | There are no suitable alternatives at present and search for technically feasible alternatives is ongoing under a 5-10 year research programme. |
| --- | --- |

—

There are no suitable alternatives at present and search for technically feasible alternatives is ongoing under a 5-10 year research programme.

---

(1)  OJ L 396, 30.12.2006, p. 1.

1

---
# C_2013206EN.01000401.xml

| 20.7.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 206/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.7.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 206/4

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.6938 — MAHLE/Behr KG)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2013/C 206/02

On 16 July 2013, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in German and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32013M6938. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32013M6938. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS  SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  SUMMARY  FINANCIAL   INFORMATION  EXTRACTED  FROM  THE
CONSOLIDATED  CONDENSED BALANCE SHEETS,  STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS,  STATEMENT OF
STOCKHOLDERS'  EQUITY AND  STATEMENT  OF CASH FLOWS FROM FORM 10K FOR THE PERIOD
ENDED JANUARY 1, 2000
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                  1,000

<S>                                               <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                     YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                 JAN-1-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                      JAN-1-2000
<CASH>                                                   988
<SECURITIES>                                               0
<RECEIVABLES>                                         93,574
<ALLOWANCES>                                           4,729
<INVENTORY>                                           61,546
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     161,667
<PP&E>                                                21,595
<DEPRECIATION>                                        11,357
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       273,406
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                105,270
<BONDS>                                              155,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                      0
<PREFERRED>                                                0
<COMMON>                                                   0
<OTHER-SE>                                             5,968
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         273,406
<SALES>                                            1,406,094
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   1,413,827
<CGS>                                              1,274,856
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      1,381,587
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                      (1,980)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         700
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                    16,679
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                       17,541
<INCOME-TAX>                                           7,872
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                    9,669
<DISCONTINUED>                                             0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                            0
<CHANGES>                                                  0
<NET-INCOME>                                           9,669
<EPS-BASIC>                                                0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                              0



</TABLE>
levelath 

March 31, 2008 

Attn: Mr. Richard Cordes 

Air Quality Division 

Minnesota Pollution Control Agency 

520 Lafayette Road North 

St. Paul, MN 55155-4194 

FedEx # 8444 2168 5304 

Re: Hibbing Taconite Company's Administrative Order by Consent Alternative Method 

Proposal for Furnace Line 2 

Dear Mr. Cordes: 

Hibbing Taconite Company (HTC) is required, as part of the Administrative Order by Consent signed by 

the MPCA and HTC on March 3, 2008, to submit an Alternative Method Proposal by March 31, 2008 for 

monitoring NOx emissions on a continuous basis for Furnace Line 2. 

Enclosed, please find HTC's Alternative Method Proposal for Furnace Line 2. Accompanying the 

proposal is a CD-ROM of the extended performance test and internal process data required by the 

Administrative Order by Consent. 

As indicated in the MPCA's letter dated March 26, 2008, the extension request by HTC dated March 20, 

2008 was approved. The Quality Assurance/Quality Control protocol required in Part 10.e. of the Order 

for Furnace Line 2 will be submitted with the Alternative Method Proposals for Furnace Lines 1 and 3 by 

June 30, 2008. 

If you have any questions or concerns, please feel free to contact me at (218) 262-6856. 

Sincerely, 

Andrea J. Hayden 

Section Manager — Environmental 

Hibbing Taconite Company 

cc: E. LaTendresse (GMO) 

D. Cartella (Cleveland-Cliffs Inc) 

J. Flegel (Cliffs-Duluth) 

B. Beresford (MPCA-Cover Letter Only) Hibbing Taconite Company 

Cliffs Mining Company, 

Managing Agent 

County Highway 5 North 

P0. Box 589 

Hibbing, MN 55746-0589 

218.262.5950 PH
U.S. flag
              An official website of the United States government Skip to main content   end of header Census.gov Newsroom Releases News Conferences
 Newsroom Archive
 Skip left menu navigation
 About the Newsroom
 				Facts for Features
 				News Releases
 				**Press Kits**
 				Tip Sheets
 Webinar: Migration Data Products **November 15, 2011 at 10:00 a.m. EST** **Event Materials** Archived Webinar [ MPEG | WMV ]

Presentation:Slides [PDF] Media Advisory: Census Bureau Webinar to Highlight Migration Data
News Release: Mover Rate Reaches Record Low, Census Bureau Reports | Spanish Version Data Sets:
   - *Geographical Mobility: 2011*
   - *Geographical Mobility: 2008 to 2009* 
   - *2010 ACS state-to-state migration flow tables*
   - *Lifetime Mobility in the United States: 2010 [PDF]* Speaker Biographies: 
   - Alison Fields, Chief, Journey-to-Work & Migration Statistics Branch, U.S. Census Bureau
   - William Frey, Senior Fellow, Brookings Institution and Research Professor in Population Studies, University of Michigan
   - Stanley Rolark, Chief, Public Information Office, U.S. Census Bureau Background Materials Geographical Mobility page
Metropolitan Policy Program, Brookings Institution
Blog
  CONNECT WITH US

Information Quality
                    Data Linkage Infrastructure
                    Data Protection and Privacy Policy
                    Accessibility      
                    FOIA
                    Inspector General
                    No FEAR Act
                    U.S. Department of Commerce
                    USA.gov
                   Measuring America's People, Places, and Economy
#### CITY OF ST. PETERSBURG, Florida, Appellant, v. Charles P. KELLEY et al., Appellees.

No. 70-450.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

March 31, 1971.

Rehearing Denied May 26, 1971.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.