alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>   5
<LEGEND>
    THE SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  SUMMARY  FINANCIAL  INFORMATION  EXTRACTED  FROM THE
    CONSOLIDATED   FINANCIAL  STATEMENTS  OF  DOUGHTIE'S  FOODS,  INC.  AND  ITS
    SUBSIDIARIES  FOR THE YEAR ENDED  DECEMBER  27, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
    ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>  1,000
       
<S>                                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-27-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                 DEC-29-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-27-1997
<CASH>                                                  27
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        9,195
<ALLOWANCES>                                           628
<INVENTORY>                                          4,669
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                    13,704
<PP&E>                                               6,139
<DEPRECIATION>                                       3,513
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                      16,445
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                4,871
<BONDS>                                              2,738
<COMMON>                                             1,495
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<OTHER-SE>                                           7,341
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                        16,445
<SALES>                                             85,233
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                    85,233
<CGS>                                               71,133
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                       83,478
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                         0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                     242
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      1,513
<INCOME-TAX>                                           566
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                    947
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                           947
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                         0.63
<EPS-DILUTED>                                         0.63
        

</TABLE>
#### Max P. ENGEL and Paul Pollack, as co-partners d/b/a Engel & Pollack, Individually and for use and benefit of William H. Cooper and Betty Cooper, his wife, Appellants, v. The LAWYERS CO-OPERATIVE PUBLISHING COMPANY, a foreign corporation, Appellee.

No. 66-556.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Third District.

April 25, 1967.

Leo M. Alpert, Miami, for appellants.

Mershon, Sawyer, Johnston, Dunwody & Cole and James E. Glass and Woodrow M. Melvin, Jr., Miami, for appellee.

Before PEARSON, CHARLES CARROLL and BARKDULL, JJ.

CHARLES CARROLL, Judge.

This is an appeal by the plaintiffs below from an order granting a motion of the defendant and dismissing the cause as to certain plaintiffs.

The plaintiffs Max P. Engel and Paul Pollack, comprising a law partnership, filed an action on behalf of themselves and for use and benefit of William H. Cooper and Betty Cooper, his wife, who were their clients. They alleged that a set of American Jurisprudence purchased by them from the defendant, a law book publishing company, included a Desk Book which contained a listing of the statutory periods of limitations for types of actions in the various states; that they relied thereon as to the limitation period in the State of Alabama for an action they were employed to prosecute there for their said clients; that during the first year after the cause of action arose, and in which it could have been sued upon in Alabama, the attorneys did not bring the action there because of reliance on information contained in the Desk Book which gave the Alabama limitation period for such an action as being six years, whereas in fact the limitation period was one year. Breach of implied warranty of fitness was alleged. A motion of the defendant to dismiss was denied as to the plaintiff lawyers individually, but was granted as to their clients William H. Cooper and Betty Cooper, his wife, for use and benefit of whom the lawyers also had sued.

Without expressing any opinion on the sufficiency of the complaint as it applies to *94the plaintiff attorneys individually — a question which we consider is not before us on this appeal — we affirm the order appealed from on authority of Rodriguez v. Shell’s City, Inc., Fla.App.1962, 141 So.2d 590, as it appears from the complaint that the plaintiff clients were not users of the product.

Affirmed.
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 3342

To establish a toll free number in the Department of Commerce to assist

consumers in determining if products are American-made.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

OCTOBER 21, 1993

Mr. TRAFICANT introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Energy and Commerce

A BILL

To establish a toll free number in the Department of Commerce to assist consumers in determining if products

are American-made.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. ESTABLISHMENT OF TOLL FREE NUMBER.

4 (a) ESTABLISHMENT.—Within 180 days of the date

5 of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Commerce

6 shall establish a toll free number which may be used by

7 consumers—

8 (1) to determine if a product is made in Amer9 ica, and
2

•HR 3342 IH

1 (2) learn where products may be purchased or

2 learn a telephone number which will provide infor3 mation on the purchase of products.

4 The Secretary shall publish the number in the Federal

5 Register and undertake such outreach activities as may

6 be appropriate to publicize the number.

7 (b) USE.—Consumers who use the toll free number

8 shall be informed that the product list is not complete but

9 is derived from registrations under section 2.

10 SEC. 2. REGISTRATION.

11 The Secretary of Commerce shall establish a proce12 dure under which the manufacturer of a product which

13 is made in America may register with the Secretary and

14 have such product included in the information available

15 through the toll free number established under section 1.

16 SEC. 3. PENALTY.

17 Any manufacturer of a product who registers a prod18 uct with the Secretary of Commerce under section 2 which

19 is not made in America may not offer such product for

20 purchase by the Federal Government and shall be subject

21 to prosecution under section 5 of the Federal Trade Com22 mission Act for making a deceptive claim.

23 SEC. 4. DEFINITION.

24 For purposes of this Act, the term ‘‘made in Amer25 ica’’ means—
3

•HR 3342 IH

1 (1) an unmanufactured end product mined or

2 produced in the United States, or

3 (2) an end product manufactured in the United

4 States if the cost of its components mined, pro5 duced, or manufactured in the United States exceeds

6 50 percent of the cost of all of its components.

Æ
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER

Appellate case name: Victor Keith Wilson v. The State of Texas

Appellate case number: 01-18-00509-CR

Trial court case number: 95CR0904

Trial court: 10th District Court of Galveston County

Although the supplemental record indicates that a copy of the record was sent to appellant 

by the trial court clerk, appellant has filed a motion asserting that he did not receive the record and 

requests (1) another copy of the record and (2) an extension of time to file his pro se response to 

appointed counsel’s Anders brief. The motion is GRANTED. 

The trial court clerk shall, no later than 10 days from the date of this order, provide another 

copy of the record, including the clerk’s record, the reporter’s record, and any supplemental 

records, to appellant. The trial court clerk shall further certify to this Court, within 15 days of the 

date of this order, the date upon which delivery of the record to appellant is made.

Appellant’s pro se response to appointed counsel’s brief shall be filed within 60 days of 

the date of this order. No further extensions will be granted.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: ___/s/ Sarah Beth Landau_____

 Acting individually 

Date: __May 23, 2019_
#### Lydia RICHARD, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Calvin SENSAT, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 3875.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Third Circuit.

June 19, 1972.

Rehearing Denied July 12, 1972.

Homer E. Barousse, Jr., Crowley, for defendant-appellant.

John G. Poteet, Jr., Lafayette, for plaintiff-appellee.

Before FRUGÉ, SAVOY, and DO-MENGEAUX, JJ.

DOMENGEAUX, Judge.

The defendant herein appeals a district court judgment condemning him to pay the sum of $750.00 plus medical expenses to his legally separated wife as the result of his commission of a battery upon her person. The plaintiff wife answered the appeal seeking an increase in the damages awarded her.

We have reviewed the evidence and the law and find that the result reached in the district court is correct. Accordingly, the judgment is affirmed at defendant-appellant’s costs in both courts.

Affirmed.
#### John Steven COOPER, Appellant, v. Louie L. WAINWRIGHT, Director, Division of Corrections, Appellee.

No. 43621.

Supreme Court of Florida.

July 12, 1973.

Certiorari denied.

CARLTON, C. J., and ROBERTS, ERVIN, McCAIN and DEKLE, JJ., concur.
##### 



Exhibit 23.1 CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PETROLEUM ENGINEERS Ralph E. Davis Associates, Inc. hereby consents to the reference to our firm and to its having
prepared a report of DOMINION RESOURCES BLACK WARRIOR TRUST (the Company), and an estimate of the
proved gas reserves for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004. We hereby further consent to the
use of the report dated February 10, 2005 appearing in the Companys Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2005 and in all current and future registration statements of the Company that
incorporate by reference such Form 10-K. RALPH E. DAVIS ASSOCIATES, INC.By:
    /s/ Allen C. BarronName:
    Allen C. BarronFebruary 10, 2005
    
    Title:
    President Consultants to the Oil and Natural Gas Industries Since the 1920s
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3423 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3423

     To clear certain impediments to the licensing of a vessel for 
 employment in the coastwise trade and fisheries of the United States.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            November 2, 1993

  Mr. Paxon introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
               Committee on Merchant Marine and Fisheries

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
     To clear certain impediments to the licensing of a vessel for 
 employment in the coastwise trade and fisheries of the United States.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
That, notwithstanding section 27 of the Merchant Marine Act, 1920 (46 
App. U.S.C. 883) and sections 12106, 12107, and 12108 of title 46, 
United States Code, as applicable on the date of this Act, the 
Secretary of Transportation may issue a certificate of documentation 
with appropriate endorsement for the vessel NAN-SEA, United States 
official number O.N.572933.

                                 <all>
```
#### CITY OF NEW ORLEANS v. William F. KLOCK and United Services Automobile Association.

No. 4494.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Fourth Circuit.

Dec. 6, 1971.

Robert K. Tracy, New Orleans, for plaintiff-appellant.

Eugene B. Vickery, Jr., of Porteous, Toledano, Hainkel & Johnson, Rudolph R. Schoemann, New Orleans, for defendants-appellees.

Before LEMMON, STOULIG and BARNETTE, JJ.

LEMMON, Judge.

This suit was consolidated for trial with that of United Services Automobile Association, et al. v. Travelers Insurance Company, et al., bearing Docket Number 4493 in this court, 255 So.2d 418, decided this day.

For the reasons assigned in that case, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

Affirmed.
#### FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF MIRAMAR, Petitioner, v. Gerald A. LEWIS, as Comptroller and as Head of the Department of Banking and Finance of the State of Florida, and Barnett Bank of Hollywood In Miramar, Florida, appearing in proper person as Barnett Bank of Broward County, Respondents.

No. II-479.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Sept. 1, 1978.

Rehearing Denied Oct. 24, 1978.

Joseph C. Jacobs & Robert J. Angerer of Ervin, Varn, Jacobs, Odom & Kitchen, Tallahassee, Warren W. Koffler, Washington, D.C., for petitioner.

S. Craig Kiser and Franklyn J. Wollett, Tallahassee, Bruce A. Weihe of Houston, Cooper & Easthope, Fort Lauderdale, for respondents.

PER CURIAM.

Petitioner brings for review the final agency action of the Comptroller of the State of Florida in granting the application of the Barnett Bank of Hollywood to open a branch bank in the City of Miramar.

Upon considering the briefs, the record and oral argument, we find no reversible error in this case. See *McDonald v. Dept. of Banking and Finance,*346 So.2d 569 (Fla. 1st DCA 1977), and *Fraser v. Lewis,*360 So.2d 1116 (Fla. 1st DCA 1978). Accordingly, the Petition for Review is DENIED.

SMITH, Acting C. J., and MELVIN and BOOTH, JJ., concur.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

October 21, 2004

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 04-60345

Conference Calendar

 

ELLIS MANN,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

LEON SMITH; MAXINE SMITH; JOHN DOES,

Defendants-Appellees.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Mississippi

USDC No. 1:04-CV-469-GuRo

--------------------

Before JOLLY, JONES, and WIENER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Ellis Mann appeals the dismissal for lack of subject matter

jurisdiction of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 lawsuit seeking to have

custody of his daughter restored to him. He argues that the

dismissal was erroneous because the district court had

jurisdiction under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and under 28 U.S.C. § 1332 as

he has recently moved to California. 

The district court lacked the authority to assume

jurisdiction over Mann’s attempt to modify the terms of a state-
No. 04-60345

-2-

court child custody order. See Rykers v. Alford, 832 F.2d 895,

900 (5th Cir. 1987); see also Chrissy F. by Medley v. Miss. Dept.

of Public Welfare, 995 F.2d 595, 599 (5th Cir. 1993). The appeal

is without arguable merit and is DISMISSED as frivolous. See 5TH

CIR. R. 42.2; Howard v. King, 707 F.2d 215, 219-20 (5th Cir.

1983). We caution Mann that the filing of frivolous appeals and

motions will invite the imposition of a sanction. 

APPEAL DISMISSED; SANCTION WARNING ISSUED.
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**Certification of CFO Pursuantto**

**18 U.S.C. Section 1350,**

**as Adopted Pursuant to**

**Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of NetSpend Holdings, Inc.(the “Company”) for the quarter ended September 30, 2010 as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), George W.Gresham, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuantto 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to his knowledge:

 

(1)   the Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)          theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 
| /s/ George W. Gresham |                    |
|-----------------------|-------------------------|
| Name:                 | George W. Gresham       |   |
| Title:                | Chief Financial Officer |   |

 

Date:November 10, 2010

 

Asigned original of this written statement required by Section 906, orother document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting thesignature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of thiswritten statement required by Section 906, has been provided to theCompany and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities andExchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

----
EXHIBIT 11Q


                           DECORATOR INDUSTRIES, INC.
             COMPUTATION OF DILUTED INCOME PER SHARE OF COMMON STOCK
                FOR THE FIVE FISCAL YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 29, 2001


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                              2001               2000               1999               1998               1997
                           ----------         ----------         ----------         ----------         ----------
<S>                        <C>                <C>                <C>                <C>                <C>
Net income                 $  861,561         $  133,198         $2,552,278         $3,080,895         $2,898,339
                           ==========         ==========         ==========         ==========         ==========

Average number of
Common Shares
Outstanding                 2,812,882          3,041,364          3,378,721          3,631,457          3,714,838

Dilutive effect of
Stock options on
Net income                      7,895             35,896            138,960            249,162            253,542
                           ----------         ----------         ----------         ----------         ----------

                            2,820,777          3,077,260          3,517,681          3,880,619          3,968,380
                           ==========         ==========         ==========         ==========         ==========

Diluted earnings
Per share:

Net income                 $     0.31         $     0.04         $     0.73         $     0.79         $     0.73
                           ==========         ==========         ==========         ==========         ==========
</TABLE>



Note:    Per share amounts and shares outstanding for 1997 have been adjusted
         for the five-for-four stock split effective July 21, 1998.
Exhibit 32.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 The undersigned, Merlyn Kirk, hereby certifies, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: (1)the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of GreenChoice International, Inc. for the period ended July 31, 2011 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of GreenChoice International, Inc.  Dated: September 16, 2011/s/ Merlyn KirkMerlyn KirkPresident, Secretary, Treasurer and Director(Principal Executive Officer, Principal FinancialOfficer, and Principal Accounting Officer)
#### Vincent J. WATERHOUSE, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 71-691.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Jan. 11, 1972.

Rehearing Denied Jan. 28, 1972.

*398Norman Francis Haft, Miami, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., and Joel D. Rosenblatt, Asst. Atty. Gen., for ap-pellee.

Before PEARSON, CHARLES CARROLL and HENDRY, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal by the defendant below from a judgment of conviction of possession of narcotic drug, on two counts of an information; one count relating to marijuana and the other to cocaine. The defendant was arrested in the nighttime, for an observed violation of a traffic regulation, which consisted of running a red light. A check made by the officer at the time of the arrest disclosed there were outstanding fugitive warrants against the defendant predicated upon earlier traffic offenses. The defendant was given the Miranda warnings by the officer, and chose not to answer any questions without an attorney present. Prior to having the defendant’s automobile towed away, the officer made an inventory search thereof, in the course of which, when a flashlight was shone into the car the officer saw the narcotic drugs lying in the car under the seat.

In the circumstances of this case, the contentions of the appellant that the search was unlawful, and that the court erred in refusing to suppress the evidence thus obtained, are without merit.

Affirmed.
|    |                                                                                              |
|----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| 1. | I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of FelCor Lodging Limited Partnership; and |

|    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            |
|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| 2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report. |

|                       |
|-----------------------|
|                       |  |  |
| Date:  April 28, 2017 |   | /s/ Steven R. Goldman |
|                  |   | Steven R. GoldmanChief Executive Officer of FelCor Lodging Trust Incorporated, asgeneral partner of FelCor Lodging Limited Partnership |
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA 

WESTERN DISTRICT 

BENJAMIN WRIGHT, 

 Petitioner 

 v. 

COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF 

ALLEGHENY COUNTY, 

 Respondent 

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 101 WM 2015 

ORDER 

PER CURIAM 

AND NOW, this 24th day of February, 2016, the Application for Leave to File 

Original Process and the Petition for Writ of Mandamus and/or Extraordinary Relief, to 

the extent it seeks mandamus relief, are GRANTED. The Court of Common Pleas of 

Allegheny County is DIRECTED to adjudicate Petitioner’s pending filing within 90 days. 

The Prothonotary is DIRECTED to serve this order on the President Judge of the 

Court of Common Pleas of Allegheny County. 

Justice Eakin did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.
#### Rudolph C. HERRING v. STATE.

No. 39425.

Supreme Court of Florida.

March 1970.

Appeal dismissed without opinion. 229 So.2d 675.
Exhibit 23.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PETROLEUM ENGINEERS

Ralph E. Davis Associates, Inc. hereby consents to the reference to our firm and to its having prepared a report of DOMINION RESOURCES BLACK WARRIOR TRUST
(the Company), and an estimate of the proved gas reserves for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013. We hereby further consent to the use of the report dated February 26, 2014 appearing in the Companys Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013 and in all current and future registration statements of the Company that incorporate by reference such Form 10-K.



RALPH E. DAVIS ASSOCIATES, INC.By:

/s/ Allen C. BarronName:

Allen C. BarronTitle:

President


March 10, 2014

Consultants to the Oil and Natural Gas Industries Since the 1920s