alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
>
Tsu -- - »*
ee | m4 i “rae

: OF THE UNITED STATES. morn
SCHEDULE No. 1.—POPULATION: deetnite Dente ma tit
“36h fy 8a

x
* yy " _
° wr

]
Le
Enumeration District No.

init cy sestaiits x

in

‘ripe tare

ee Bee pm nee we
ee eee

if
i:

lees oe pees Orig oe Jee 1 tee
on tae ae hee

Atteeted cobeoet Ge

1 Beside ent
te
ee et

m OA 15 U4 FH DeDroma

on Di if... 4 Ae. : P af en ie

Historic census records are maintained and released by the National Archives and Records Administration, not the U.S. Census Bureau.

Visit http://www.archives.gov for more information about publicly available records like the one shown here.

mor er Nee THM DE wi A ahels Ny Dah hath &lT,
HEAT le Viglen eta  Wilahnes Meth Dalz

Virlenn Pwth cht Velvedic.

Verte Mahe Nevth. Dcheta Neth 19 late

fy F . . ‘ , J alba.

Te re Vanni Ip

Vata A ; ri path Dakota

28.4 . As se s

Pd =
- 4 y}
— am fin 2. 2A

TM Ot Wed aS )
Wy New (16130 Mts

i ae oe oe oe

rn
7
3
u
p
ws
a7
-
f°
wo
3
a
383
a
aS
”
tr
a»
30
0

<@- 4 ry

&$ 38

P de~ Gee “ Li & Roem A

SCHEDULE No. J.—POPULATION—Continued.
SPECIAL INQUIRIES RELATING TO INDIANS.

INSTRUCTIONS FOR FILLING THIS SCHEDULE.
CONTUNUED PROM -a~ SDE OF srCEET)

The following instructions apply to columns 29 to 3s:

COLUMN 29.-- Write the Indian name, if the person has one, in addition
te the English name given in column 3. If the Indian has only one name,
Indian or English, repeat the name in this column.

Courusxs 34, 31, asp 32.—If the Indian was born in thie country
answer: should be obtained, if possible, to inquiries 13, 14, and 15, relating
t the state of birth of the person and of his or her parenta In any event
secure the name of the tribe with which the person is connected and the name
of the tribe of his or her parents, and enter the same in columns 30, 31, and 53.

CoLrus 33.—If the Indian has no white bloud, write 6. If he or she has
white bhad, write 4, i, i, whichever fraction is nearest the truth.

Cotcus 4.—If the Indian man is living with more than one wife, or if
the Indian woman is a plaral wife or has more than one busted, write
“Vea.” If net, write “No.” If the Indian is single, leave the column blank.

Crruzexsuir.—If the Indian was born in this country, no entry can be
made in columne 14, 17, of 18; but for columne 35, 36, and 37 anewers must
be obtained. If the Indian was burn in ancther country, anewers will be

marie beth in columns 16, 17, aed 14, and in columns 35, 34, and 37, in acoord-
a © with the facts.

two cases the atewer to this inquiry is “* Yea”

An Indies on & reservation, without en allotment, or roaming over un-
“mot tazed,~ aad for euch Indians the answer

Cotcus 34.—If the Indian was born in tribal relations, but has
Amencan citisenship, write the year in which it was scquired. If he or the
Geet

° ecqeired cHtasemahip Tecet ving an elloteent
“thersthetse tg pms ele hl ite ae cael
other manasa, write “ Na” or she has m4
chip, leave the column bank. as ah |
y th a bewt, or
- te living
103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 3514

AN ACT

To clarify the regulatory oversight exercised by the

to certain electric borrowers.Rural Electrification Administration with respect
103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 3514

AN ACT

To clarify the regulatory oversight exercised by the Rural

Electrification Administration with respect to certain

electric borrowers.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. ADMINISTRATIVE PROHIBITIONS APPLICABLE

4 TO CERTAIN ELECTRIC BORROWERS.

5 Section 306E of the Rural Electrification Act of 1936

6 is amended to read as follows:
2

•HR 3514 EH

1 ‘‘SEC. 306E. ADMINISTRATIVE PROHIBITIONS APPLICABLE

2 TO CERTAIN ELECTRIC BORROWERS.

3 ‘‘(a) IN GENERAL.—For the purpose of relieving bor4 rowers of unnecessary and burdensome requirements, the

5 Administrator, guided by the practices of private lenders

6 with respect to similar credit risks, shall issue regulations,

7 applicable to any electric borrower under this Act whose

8 net worth exceeds 110 percent of the outstanding principal

9 balance on all loans made or guaranteed to the borrower

10 by the Administrator, to minimize those approval rights,

11 requirements, restrictions, and prohibitions that the Ad12 ministrator otherwise may establish with respect to the op13 erations of such a borrower.

14 ‘‘(b) SUBORDINATION OR SHARING OF LIENS.—At

15 the request of a private lender providing financing to such

16 a borrower for a capital investment, the Administrator

17 shall, expeditiously, either offer to share the government’s

18 lien on the borrower’s system or offer to subordinate the

19 government’s lien on that property financed by the private

20 lender.

21 ‘‘(c) ISSUANCE OF REGULATIONS.—In issuing regu22 lations implementing this section, the Administrator may

23 establish requirements, guided by the practices of private

24 lenders, to ensure that the security for any loan made or

25 guaranteed under this Act is reasonably adequate.
3

•HR 3514 EH

1 ‘‘(d) AUTHORITY OF THE ADMINISTRATOR.—Nothing

2 in this section limits the authority of the Administrator

3 to establish terms and conditions with respect to the use

4 by borrowers of the proceeds of loans made or guaranteed

5 under this Act or to take any other action specifically au6 thorized by law.’’.

7 SEC. 2. ISSUANCE OF REGULATIONS.

8 The Administrator of the Rural Electrification Ad9 ministration shall issue interim final regulations imple10 menting this Act not later than 180 days after enactment.

11 If the regulations are not issued within such period of

12 time, the Administrator may not, until the Administrator

13 issues such regulations, require prior approval of, establish

14 any requirement, restriction, or prohibition, with respect

15 to the operations of any electric borrower under the Rural

16 Electrification Act of 1936 whose net worth exceeds 100

17 percent of the outstanding principal balance on all loans

18 made or guaranteed to the borrower by the Administrator.
`[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3049 Engrossed in House (EH)]

103d CONGRESS

  1st Session

                               H. R. 3049

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

    To extend the current interim exemption under the Marine Mammal 
      Protection Act for commercial fisheries until April 1, 1994.






103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3049

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT


 
    To extend the current interim exemption under the Marine Mammal 
      Protection Act for commercial fisheries until April 1, 1994.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled, That section 114(a)(1) 
of the Marine Mammal Protection Act of 1972 (16 U.S.C. 1383a(a)(1)), is 
amended by striking ``October 1, 1993,'' and inserting in lieu thereof 
``April 1, 1994,''.

            Passed the House of Representatives September 21, 1993.

            Attest:






                                                                 Clerk.`
#### Johnny M. GARDNER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 71-604.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

March 22, 1972.

Walter R. Talley, Public Defender, and D. Turner Matthews, Asst. Public Defender, Brandenton, for appellant.

*508Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Charles Corees, Jr., Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed on authority of Steinhauser v. State, Fla.App.2d 1969, 228 So.2d 446.

PIERCE, C. J., and LILES and MANN, JJ., concur.
#### R. Bruce JONES, Jr., Appellant, v. Patricia C. JONES, Appellee.

No. 70-715.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Oct. 7, 1970.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Palm Beach County; Hugh MacMillan, Judge.

Appeal quashed.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 24.2

INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT
-----------------------------


We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement Nos. 33-
14969 and 33-78128 each on Form S-8 of our report dated January 30, 1998 (which
expresses an exception relating to the Company's accounting for certain spare
and repair parts inventories and includes an explanatory paragraph relating to
recurring losses from operations and liquidity problems which raise substantial
doubt about the Company's ability to continue as a going concern) appearing in
this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Datametrics Corporation for the fiscal year
ended October 26, 1997.


/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP

Jericho, New York
February 5, 1998
# C_2012251EN.01000102.xml

| 21.8.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 251/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.8.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 251/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.6537 — Faurecia/Plastal)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2012/C 251/02

On 23 July 2012, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32012M6537. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32012M6537. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.

---
##### 



Exhibit 32-6

CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT

I, David E. Meador, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of
Detroit Edison Company (the Company), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that to the best of my
knowledge and belief:



|(1) |  | the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the annual period ended
December 31, 2003 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C.
78m or 78o(d)); and
|--- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   
|(2) |  | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.                                                                                           

|                     |  |                                          
|-------------------- |  | -----------------------------------------
|Dated: March 1, 2004 |  | /s/ DAVID E. MEADOR                      
|                     |  |                                          
|                     |  | David E. Meador                          
|                     |  | Senior Vice President and Chief Financial
|                     |  | Officer of Detroit Edison Company
#qfcontent,
#qfcontent > div,
#qfcontent > nav {
  min-width: 295px !important;
}
<PAGE>



                                  EXHIBIT 23.1






               CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS



We consent to the inclusion of our report dated March 21, 2000, with respect to
the financial statements of Spiros Development Corporation II, Inc. for the year
ended December 31, 1999 in the Current Report on Form 8-K of Dura
Pharmaceuticals, Inc. that is expected to be filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on or about September 15, 2000, and to the incorporation by
reference of such Form 8-K in Registration Statement No. 333-90891 on Form S-8
and Registration Statement Nos. 33-71798, 33-93914, and 333-37955 on Form S-3 of
Dura Pharmaceuticals, Inc.



                                                       /s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP

San Diego, California
September 15, 2000
##### 



THE DETROIT EDISON COMPANY
COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
 Twelve Months Ended December 312007
    
    
    2006
    
    
    2005
    
    
    2004
    
    
    2003(Millions of Dollars)Earnings:Pretax earnings
    
    $
    466
    
    
    $
    482
    
    
    $
    426
    
    
    $
    214
    
    
    $
    397Fixed charges
    
    
    315
    
    
    
    299
    
    
    
    280
    
    
    
    294
    
    
    
    294Net earnings
    
    $
    781
    
    
    $
    781
    
    
    $
    706
    
    
    $
    508
    
    
    $
    691Fixed charges:Interest expense
    
    $
    294
    
    
    $
    278
    
    
    $
    267
    
    
    $
    280
    
    
    $
    284Adjustments
    
    
    21
    
    
    
    21
    
    
    
    13
    
    
    
    14
    
    
    
    10Fixed charges
    
    $
    315
    
    
    $
    299
    
    
    $
    280
    
    
    $
    294
    
    
    $
    294Ratio of earnings to fixed charges
    
    
    2.48
    
    
    
    2.61
    
    
    
    2.52
    
    
    
    1.73
    
    
    
    2.35
Exhibit 32.1


                           SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                               SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In  connection  with the  Quarterly  Report of  Brooklyn  Cheesecake  & Desserts
Company,  Inc. (the "Company") on form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30,
2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange  Commission on or about the date
hereof, I, Anthony J. Merante,  President,  Chief Executive  Officer,  and Chief
Financial Officer of the Company certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, that to the
best of my knowledge, that

      (i)   the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) and
            Section  15(d) of the  Securities  Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
            and

      (ii)  the  information  contained  in the Report  fairly  present,  in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company at the dates and for the periods indicated.

Date: December 6, 2006
                             /s/ Anthony J. Merante
                             -----------------------------------
                             Anthony J. Merante
                             President, Chief Executive Officer,
                             and Chief Financial Officer


A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the  electronic  version of this written  statement
required by Section  906,  has been  provided to Brooklyn  Cheesecake & Desserts
Company,  Inc.  and will be  retained by and  furnished  to the  Securities  and
Exchange Commissions or its staff upon request
#### Bernard P. GOLDFARB, Appellant, v. STROLLER FISHERIES, INC., a Florida corporation, Appellee.

No. 68-598.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Third District.

Sept. 25, 1968.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed.
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 2984

To amend the Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act of 1991

relating to an urban mobility project for New York City, New York.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

AUGUST 6, 1993

Mr. NADLER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Public Works and Transportation

A BILL

To amend the Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency

Act of 1991 relating to an urban mobility project for

New York City, New York.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That item 9 of the table set forth in section 1106(b)(2)

4 of the Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act

5 of 1991 (105 Stat. 2044) is amended by striking ‘‘Im6 provements on Miller Highway in New York City, NY’’

7 and inserting ‘‘Improvements to the 72nd Street station

8 of the Interborough Rapid Transit line located at intersec9 tion of West 72nd Street and Broadway, New York, NY’’.

Æ
# C_2014408EN.01000301.xml

| 15.11.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 408/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.11.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 408/3

---

COMMUNITY PLANT VARIETY OFFICE

Publication of the final accounts for the financial year 2013

2014/C 408/03

The complete version of the final accounts may be found at the following address:

http://www.cpvo.europa.eu/main/en/home/about-the-cpvo/financing

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME AND CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                             193
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   12,471
<ALLOWANCES>                                       249
<INVENTORY>                                     10,926
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                26,231
<PP&E>                                          58,007
<DEPRECIATION>                                  32,744
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  55,991
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           20,307
<BONDS>                                            468
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         3,167
<OTHER-SE>                                      14,858
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    55,991
<SALES>                                         86,039
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                86,039
<CGS>                                           64,754
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   64,754
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 781
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (968)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (171)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (797)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (797)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.50)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.50)
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 23.01
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statements Nos.
33-27873, 33-62531 and 33-62533 of Daedalus Enterprises, Inc. on Form S-8 of
our report dated September 18, 1996 (October 25, 1996 as to the third and
fifth paragraphs of Note D and the entire Note K), (which expresses an
unqualified opinion and includes and explanatory paragraph relating to
substantial doubt about the Company's ability to continue as a going
concern)  appearing in the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Daedalus
Enterprises, Inc. and Subsidiaries for the year ended July 31, 1996.

/s/Deloitte & Touche LLP
---------------------------
Deloitte & Touche LLP
Ann Arbor, Michigan
October 25, 1996
<PAGE>


                                                                   Exhibit 23.14

To the Board of Directors and Shareholders of
Security Capital European Realty
Luxembourg

We have audited the consolidated statement of net assets of Security Capital
European Realty (the "Company") as at 31 December 2000, and the related
consolidated statement of operations, the statement of changes in consolidated
net assets, the statement of changes in shares outstanding, the statement of
investments and the notes to the consolidated financial statements for the year
ended 31 December 2000. These consolidated financial statements are the
responsibility of the Board of Directors of the Company. Our responsibility is
to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our
audit.

We conducted our audit in accordance with International Standards on Auditing
and auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America. Those
Standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable
assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of
material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence
supporting the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements.
An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant
estimates made by the Board of Directors, as well as evaluating the overall
consolidated financial statements presentation. We believe that our audit
provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements described above give, in
conformity with Luxembourg legal and regulatory requirements, a true and fair
view of the financial position of Security Capital European Realty at December
31, 2000 and the results of its operations and changes in net assets
for the year ended 31 December 2000.

Accounting practices required by the Luxembourg legal and regulatory framework
very in certain important respects from accounting principles generally accepted
in the United States of America. The application of the latter would have affect
the determination of the consolidated results of its operations expressed in
United States dollars for the year ended December 31, 2000 and the determination
of shareholders' equity and consolidated financial position also expressed in
United States dollars at December 31, 2000 to the extend summarized in Note 19
to the consolidated financial statements.

Supplementary information included in the annual financial report has been
reviewed in the context of our mandate but has not been subject to specific
audit procedures carried out in accordance with the standards described above.
Consequently, we express no opinion on such information. We have no observation
to make concerning such information in the context of the financial statements
taken as a whole.

PricewaterhouseCoopers S.a.r.l.                   Luxembourg, 14 March 2001
Reviseur d'entreprises
Represented by




Pascal Rakovsky
Amaury Eward