Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 161 / Monday, August 20, 2018 / Notices 42139 

The State asserts that this river system 

was navigable at the time of Alaska 

Statehood. As such, the State contends 

that ownership of the lands underlying 

this river system automatically passed 

from the United States to the State in 

1959 at the time of Statehood under the 

Equal Footing Doctrine; the Submerged 

Lands Act of 1953; the Alaska Statehood 

Act of 1959; and other title navigability 

law. Section 315 of FLPMA authorizes 

the BLM to issue an RDI when it 

determines that a record interest of the 

United States in lands has terminated by 

law or is otherwise invalid, and a 

disclaimer will help remove a cloud on 

title to such lands. 

The State’s application is for an RDI 

for all submerged lands underlying the 

portion of the Fortymile River System 

described below. Specifically, these are 

all submerged lands between the 

ordinary high water marks of the left 

and right banks of the Fortymile River, 

beginning sixty feet upstream of the 

international border with Canada, 

upstream to the confluence of the North 

and South Forks of the Fortymile River 

within section 10, township 8 south, 

range 30 east, Fairbanks Meridian, 

Alaska; all submerged lands between 

the ordinary high water marks of the left 

and right banks of the South Fork of the 

Fortymile River beginning at the 

confluence with the North Fork of the 

Fortymile River upstream to the 

confluence of the Mosquito and 

Dennison Forks of the Fortymile River 

within section 8, township 26 north, 

range 18 east, Fairbanks Meridian, 

Alaska; and all submerged lands 

between the ordinary high water marks 

of the left and right banks of the North 

Fork of the Fortymile River, beginning 

at its confluence with the South Fork of 

the Fortymile River, upstream to the 

dead-end slough which is a remnant of 

the Knik in section 20, township 6 

south, range 29 east, Fairbanks 

Meridian, Alaska. The State listed the 

main stem of the Fortymile River’s 

coverage on the USGS 1:63,360 series 

topographic map Eagle A–2 (1956), 

Eagle B–1 (1956) and Eagle B–2 (1956); 

for the North Fork of the Fortymile 

River, Eagle A–2 (1956), Eagle B–2 

(1956) and Eagle B–3 (1956); and the 

South Fork of the Fortymile River is 

shown on the Eagle A–2 (1956) 

quadrangle. 

Over time, the precise location of the 

submerged lands described above may 

vary between townships due to the 

ambulatory nature of these water bodies. 

An RDI is a legal document through 

which the BLM disclaims the United 

States’ interest in, or ownership of, 

specified lands, but the disclaimer does 

not grant, convey, transfer, or renounce 

any title or interest in the lands, nor 

does it release any tax, judgment, or 

lien. This Notice of Application is to 

inform the public of the pending 

application and the State’s supporting 

evidence, as well as to provide the 

opportunity to comment or provide 

additional information to the BLM. 

The BLM will not make a final 

decision on the merits of the State’s 

application before November 19, 2018. 

During this 90-day period, interested 

parties may comment on the State’s 

application, FF–97215, and supporting 

evidence. Interested parties may also 

comment on the BLM’s draft report, 

which is available on the BLM’s RDI 

website (see FOR FURTHER INFORMATION

CONTACT above). 

Copies of the State’s application, 

supporting evidence, the BLM draft 

report, and comments, including names 

and street addresses of commenters, will 

be available for public review at the 

BLM Alaska Public Information Center 

(Public Room), 222 West 8th Avenue, 

Anchorage, Alaska, during regular 

business hours 8 a.m. to 4 p.m., Monday 

through Friday, except holidays. 

Before including your address, phone 

number, email address, or other 

personally identifying information in 

your comment, you should be aware 

that your entire comment—including 

your personally identifiable 

information—may be made publicly 

available at any time. While you can ask 

the BLM in your comment to withhold 

your personally identifiable information 

from public review, we cannot 

guarantee that we will be able to do so. 

If the BLM determines the State’s 

evidence and any additional 

information the agency receives 

concerning the State’s application is 

sufficient to reach a favorable 

determination, and neither the records 

nor a valid objection discloses a reason 

not to disclaim, the BLM may decide to 

approve the application for the RDI. 

Authority: 43 CFR 1864.2. 

Erika L. Reed, 

Deputy State Director, Division of Lands and 

Cadastral, Alaska. 

[FR Doc. 2018–17878 Filed 8–17–18; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4310–JA–P 

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR 

Bureau of Land Management 

[18X.LLID933000.L14400000.ET0000; IDI– 

38117] 

Public Land Order No. 7872; 

Withdrawal of National Forest System 

Land for the Dump Creek Diversion 

Ditch, Idaho 

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, 

Interior. 

ACTION: Public Land Order. 

SUMMARY: This Order withdraws 107.02 

acres of National Forest System land 

from location and entry under the 

United States mining laws for a period 

of 20 years to protect the Dump Creek 

Diversion Ditch within the Salmon 

National Forest. The purpose of this 

withdrawal is to ensure the continued 

conservation of the aquatic and riparian 

habitats, and to protect the Federal 

watershed investments in the Salmon 

River Drainage. 

DATES: This Public Land Order takes 

effect on August 20, 2018. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jeff 

Cartwright, Bureau of Land Management 

(BLM), Idaho State Office (208) 373– 

3885. Persons who use a 

telecommunications device for the deaf 

(TDD) may call the Federal Relay 

Service (FRS) at 1–800–877–8339 to 

reach the Bureau of Land Management 

contact during normal business hours. 

The FRS is available 24 hours a day, 7 

days a week, to leave a message or 

question with the above individual. You 

will receive a reply during normal 

business hours. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This order 

withdraws the land on behalf of the 

United States Forest Service for the 

purpose of preserving the existing 

groundwater regime and to protect the 

integrity of the reclamation and 

watershed stabilization and investment 

of Federal funds within the Dump Creek 

project. 

Order 

By virtue of the authority vested in 

the Secretary of the Interior by Section 

204 of the Federal Land Policy and 

Management Act of 1976, 43 U.S.C. 

1714, it is ordered as follows: 

1. Subject to valid existing rights, the 

following described National Forest 

System land is hereby withdrawn from 

location and entry under the United 

States mining laws for a period of 20 

years to preserve the existing 

groundwater regime and to protect the 

integrity of the reclamation and 

watershed stabilization and investment 


daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with NOTICES
42140 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 161 / Monday, August 20, 2018 / Notices 

1The record is defined in sec. 207.2(f) of the 

Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 

CFR 207.2(f)). 

of Federal funds within the Dump Creek 

project. The land will remain open to 

discretionary uses. 

Salmon National Forest 

Boise Meridian 

T. 23 N., R. 20 E., 

Secs. 12, 13, and 24. 

Beginning at USLM No. 4, Eureka Mining 

District, said Monument No. 4 being more 

particularly located in the unsurveyed 

NW1⁄4SE1⁄4 Section 24. From point of 

beginning, North 4°32′52′′ East 5061.93 feet 

to Corner No. 1, the True Point of Beginning, 

said Corner being identical with Corner No. 

1 Lemhi Gold Placer, as shown on Moose 

Creek Hydraulic Placer Mineral Survey Plat 

No. 3057. Thence North 0°01′ West, 4109.7 

feet along the west line of Lemhi Gold Placer 

to a point at the intersection of line 1–2 of 

Rocky Mountain Placer, MS No. 1867, which 

point lies North 58°56′ West, 58.1 feet from 

Corner No. 1 of MS No. 1867 and said point 

being Corner No. 2 of herein described lands; 

Thence North 58°56′ West, along line 1–2 of 

MS No. 1867 for a distance of 817.35 feet to 

Corner No. 3; Thence South 0°01′ East, 

4529.24 feet to Corner No. 4; Thence South 

8°33′ East, 1877.1 feet to Corner No. 5; 

Thence South 89°49′ East, 883 feet to Corner 

No. 6, said Corner No. 6 being identical with 

Corner No. 4 of Moose Creek Hydraulic 

Placer MS 3057; Thence North 8°33′ West, 

1877.1 feet along the west line of said Moose 

Creek Hydraulic Placer to Corner No. 7 said 

Corner No. 7 being identical with Corner No. 

5 of MS No. 3057; Thence North 89°49′ West, 

183 feet to Corner No. 1, the True Point of 

Beginning. 

The area described aggregates 107.02 acres 

in Lemhi County. 

2. The withdrawal made by this order 

does not alter the applicability of the 

general land laws governing the use of 

National Forest System land under 

lease, license, or permit, or governing 

the disposal of their mineral or 

vegetative resources other than under 

the mining laws. 

3. This withdrawal will expire 20 

years from the effective date of this 

order unless, as a result of a review 

conducted before the expiration date 

pursuant to Section 204(f) of the Federal 

Land Policy and Management Act of 

1976, 43 U.S.C. 1714(f) the Secretary 

determines that the withdrawal shall be 

extended. 

Dated: July 9, 2018. 

Joseph R. Balash, 

Assistant Secretary, Land and Minerals 

Management. 

[FR Doc. 2018–17870 Filed 8–17–18; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3410–11–P 

INTERNATIONAL TRADE 

COMMISSION 

[Investigation Nos. 701–TA–489 and 731– 

TA–1201 (Review)] 

Drawn Stainless Steel Sinks From 

China; Determination 

On the basis of the record 1 developed 

in the subject five-year reviews, the 

United States International Trade 

Commission (‘‘Commission’’) 

determines, pursuant to the Tariff Act of 

1930 (‘‘the Act’’), that revocation of the 

countervailing and antidumping duty 

orders on drawn stainless steel sinks 

from China would be likely to lead to 

continuation or recurrence of material 

injury to an industry in the United 

States within a reasonably foreseeable 

time. 

Background 

The Commission, pursuant to section 

751(c) of the Act (19 U.S.C. 1675(c)), 

instituted these reviews on March 1, 

2018 (83 FR 8887) and determined on 

June 4, 2018 that it would conduct 

expedited reviews (83 FR 30193, June 

27, 2018). 

The Commission made these 

determinations pursuant to section 

751(c) of the Act (19 U.S.C. 1675(c)). It 

completed and filed its determinations 

in these reviews on August 14, 2018. 

The views of the Commission are 

contained in USITC Publication 4810 

(August 2018), entitled Drawn Stainless 

Steel Sinks from China: Investigation 

Nos. 701–TA–489 and 731–TA–1201 

(Review). 

By order of the Commission. 

Issued: August 15, 2018. 

Lisa Barton, 

Secretary to the Commission. 

[FR Doc. 2018–17868 Filed 8–17–18; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7020–02–P 

INTERNATIONAL TRADE 

COMMISSION 

Summary of Commission Practice 

Relating to Administrative Protective 

Orders 

AGENCY: U.S. International Trade 

Commission. 

ACTION: Summary of Commission 

practice relating to administrative 

protective orders. 

SUMMARY: Since February 1991, the U.S. 

International Trade Commission 

(‘‘Commission’’) has published in the 

Federal Register reports on the status of 

its practice with respect to violations of 

its administrative protective orders 

(‘‘APOs’’) under title VII of the Tariff 

Act of 1930, in response to a direction 

contained in the Conference Report to 

the Customs and Trade Act of 1990. 

Over time, the Commission has added to 

its report discussions of APO breaches 

in Commission proceedings other than 

under title VII and violations of the 

Commission’s rules including the rule 

on bracketing business proprietary 

information (‘‘BPI’’) (the ‘‘24-hour 

rule’’). This notice provides a summary 

of breach investigations (APOB 

investigations) completed during 

calendar year 2017. This summary 

addresses an APOB investigation related 

to a proceeding under title VII of the 

Tariff Act of 1930. The Commission 

intends that this report inform 

representatives of parties to Commission 

proceedings as to some specific types of 

APO breaches encountered by the 

Commission and the corresponding 

types of actions the Commission has 

taken. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ron 

Traud, Office of the General Counsel, 

U.S. International Trade Commission, 

telephone (202) 205–3427. Hearing 

impaired individuals are advised that 

information on this matter can be 

obtained by contacting the 

Commission’s TDD terminal at (202) 

205–1810. General information 

concerning the Commission can also be 

obtained by accessing its website 

(https://www.usitc.gov). 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Representatives of parties to 

investigations or other proceedings 

conducted under title VII of the Tariff 

Act of 1930, section 337 of the Tariff Act 

of 1930, the North American Free Trade 

Agreement (NAFTA) Article 1904.13, 

and safeguard-related provisions such as 

section 202 of the Trade Act of 1974, 

may enter into APOs that permit them, 

under strict conditions, to obtain access 

to BPI (title VII) and confidential 

business information (‘‘CBI’’) 

(safeguard-related provisions and 

section 337) of other parties or nonparties. See, e.g., 19 U.S.C. 1677f; 19 

CFR 207.7; 19 U.S.C. 1337(n); 19 CFR 

210.5, 210.34; 19 U.S.C. 2252(i); 19 CFR 

206.17; 19 U.S.C. 1516a(g)(7)(A); and 19 

CFR 207.100, et. seq. The discussion 

below describes an APO breach 

investigation that the Commission has 

completed during calendar year 2017, 

including a description of actions taken 

in response to this breach. 

Since 1991, the Commission has 

published annually a summary of its 

actions in response to violations of 


daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with NOTICES