Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 209 / Wednesday, October 29, 2014 / Rules and Regulations 64305 

Authority: 5 U.S.C. 301, 552, 552a; 8 U.S.C. 

1101, 1103, 1304, 1356, 1356b; 31 U.S.C. 

9701; Public Law 107–296, 116 Stat. 2135 (6 

U.S.C. 1 et seq.); E.O. 12356, 47 FR 14874, 

15557, 3 CFR, 1982 Comp., p. 166; 8 CFR part 

2; Pub. L. 112–54. 

Subpart A—Applying for Benefits, 

Surety Bonds, Fees 

■ 2. Section 103.2(b)(19) is revised to 

read as follows: 

§ 103.2 Submission and adjudication of 

benefit requests. 

* * * * * 

(b) * * * 

(19) Notification. (i) Unrepresented 

applicants or petitioners. USCIS will 

only send original notices and 

documents evidencing lawful status 

based on the approval of a benefit 

request directly to the applicant or 

petitioner if the applicant or petitioner 

is not represented. 

(ii) Represented applicants or 

petitioners. (A) Notices. When an 

applicant or petitioner is represented, 

USCIS will send original notices both to 

the applicant or petitioner and his or 

her authorized attorney or accredited 

representative. If provided in this title, 

on the applicable form, or on form 

instructions, an applicant or petitioner 

filing a paper application or petition 

may request that all original notices, 

such as requests for evidence and 

notices of decision, only be sent to the 

official business address of the 

applicant’s or petitioner’s authorized 

attorney or accredited representative, as 

reflected on a properly executed Notice 

of Entry of Appearance as Attorney or 

Accredited Representative. In such 

instances, a courtesy copy of the 

original notice will be sent to the 

applicant or petitioner. 

(B) Electronic notices. For 

applications or petitions filed 

electronically, USCIS will notify both 

the applicant or petitioner and the 

authorized attorney or accredited 

representative electronically of any 

notices or decisions. Except as provided 

in paragraph (b)(19)(ii)(C) of this 

section, USCIS will not issue paper 

notices or decisions for electronicallyfiled applications or petitions, unless: 

(1) The option exists for the applicant 

or petitioner to request to receive paper 

notices or decisions by mail through the 

U.S. Postal Service, by indicating this 

preference in his or her electronic 

online account profile in USCIS’s 

electronic immigration system; or 

(2) USCIS, in its discretion, 

determines that issuing a paper notice 

or decision for an electronically-filed 

application or petition is warranted. 

(C) Approval notices with attached 

Arrival-Departure Records. USCIS will 

send an original paper approval notice 

with an attached Arrival-Departure 

Record, reflecting USCIS’s approval of 

an applicant’s request for an extension 

of stay or change of status, to the official 

business address of the applicant’s or 

petitioner’s attorney or accredited 

representative, as reflected on a 

properly executed Notice of Entry of 

Appearance as Attorney or Accredited 

Representative or in the address section 

of the online representative account 

profile in USCIS’s electronic 

immigration system, unless the 

applicant specifically requests that the 

original approval notice with an 

attached Arrival-Departure Record be 

sent directly to his or her mailing 

address. 

(iii) Secure identity documents. 

USCIS will send secure identification 

documents, such as a Permanent 

Resident Card or Employment 

Authorization Document, only to the 

applicant or self-petitioner unless the 

applicant or self-petitioner specifically 

consents to having his or her secure 

identification document sent to the 

official business address of the 

applicant’s or self-petitioner’s attorney 

of record or accredited representative, as 

reflected on a properly executed Notice 

of Entry of Appearance as Attorney or 

Accredited Representative or in the 

address section of the online 

representative account profile in 

USCIS’s electronic immigration system. 

* * * * * 

Jeh Charles Johnson, 

Secretary. 

[FR Doc. 2014–25622 Filed 10–28–14; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 9111–97–P 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

Federal Aviation Administration 

14 CFR Part 39 

[Docket No. FAA–2014–0285; Directorate 

Identifier 2014–NM–035–AD; Amendment 

39–17990; AD 2012–26–15 R1] 

RIN 2120–AA64 

Airworthiness Directives; Honeywell 

International Inc. Air Data Pressure 

Transducers 

AGENCY: Federal Aviation 

Administration (FAA), Department of 

Transportation (DOT). 

ACTION: Final rule; removal. 

SUMMARY: We are removing 

Airworthiness Directive (AD) 2012–26– 

15, which applied to certain Honeywell 

International Inc. air data pressure 

transducers as installed on various 

aircraft. AD 2012–26–15 required doing 

various tests or checks of equipment 

having certain air data pressure 

transducers, removing equipment if 

necessary, and reporting the results of 

the tests or checks. As an option to the 

tests or checks, AD 2012–26–15 allowed 

removal of affected equipment having 

certain air data pressure transducers. 

We issued AD 2012–26–15 to detect and 

correct inaccuracies of the pressure 

sensors, which could result in altitude, 

computed airspeed, true airspeed, and 

Mach computation errors. AD 2012–26– 

15 reported that these errors could 

reduce the ability of the flightcrew to 

maintain the safe flight of the aircraft 

and could result in consequent loss of 

control of the aircraft. Since we issued 

AD 2012–26–15, we have received new 

data indicating that the safety risk is 

lower than originally estimated. 

DATES: This AD becomes effective 

December 3, 2014. 

ADDRESSES: You may examine the AD 

docket on the Internet at http://

www.regulations.gov/

#!docketDetail;D=FAA-2014-0285; or in 

person at the Docket Management 

Facility, U.S. Department of 

Transportation, Docket Operations, M– 

30, West Building Ground Floor, Room 

W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., 

Washington, DC. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Sreekant Sarma, Aerospace Engineer, 

Systems and Equipment Branch, ANM– 

130L, FAA, Los Angeles Aircraft 

Certification Office, 3960 Paramount 

Boulevard, Lakewood, CA 90712–4137; 

phone: 562–627–5351; fax: 562–627– 

5210; email: sreekant.sarma@faa.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Discussion 

We issued a notice of proposed 

rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14 CFR 

part 39 by adding an AD that would 

apply to certain Honeywell 

International Inc. air data pressure 

transducers as installed on various 

aircraft. The NPRM published in the 

Federal Register on May 28, 2014 (79 

FR 30498). The NPRM was prompted by 

new data indicating that the safety risk 

is lower than originally estimated. The 

NPRM proposed to remove AD 2012– 

26–15, Amendment 39–17310 (78 FR 

1735, January 9, 2013). 

Comments 

We gave the public the opportunity to 

participate in developing this AD. We 

considered the comment received. 


rmajette on DSK2TPTVN1PROD with RULES
64306 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 209 / Wednesday, October 29, 2014 / Rules and Regulations 

Boeing concurred with the NPRM (79 

FR 30498, May 28, 2014). 

Conclusion 

We reviewed the available data, 

including the comment received, and 

determined that air safety and the 

public interest require adopting this AD 

as proposed except for minor editorial 

changes. We have determined that these 

minor changes: 

• Are consistent with the intent that 

was proposed in the NPRM (79 FR 

30498, May 28, 2014); and 

• Do not add any additional burden 

upon the public than was already 

proposed in the NPRM (79 FR 30498, 

May 28, 2014). 

Authority for This Rulemaking 

Title 49 of the United States Code 

specifies the FAA’s authority to issue 

rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, 

section 106, describes the authority of 

the FAA Administrator. ‘‘Subtitle VII: 

Aviation Programs,’’ describes in more 

detail the scope of the Agency’s 

authority. 

We are issuing this rulemaking under 

the authority described in ‘‘Subtitle VII, 

Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: 

General requirements.’’ Under that 

section, Congress charges the FAA with 

promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in 

air commerce by prescribing regulations 

for practices, methods, and procedures 

the Administrator finds necessary for 

safety in air commerce. This regulation 

is within the scope of that authority. 

Regulatory Findings 

We determined that this AD will not 

have federalism implications under 

Executive Order 13132. This AD will 

not have a substantial direct effect on 

the States, on the relationship between 

the national government and the States, 

or on the distribution of power and 

responsibilities among the various 

levels of government. 

For the reasons discussed above, I 

certify that this AD: 

1. Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory 

action’’ under Executive Order 12866; 

2. Is not a ‘‘significant rule’’ under the 

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures 

(44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); 

3. Will not affect intrastate aviation in 

Alaska; and 

4. Will not have a significant 

economic impact, positive or negative, 

on a substantial number of small entities 

under the criteria of the Regulatory 

Flexibility Act. 

Examining the AD Docket 

You may examine the AD docket on 

the Internet at http://

www.regulations.gov/

#!docketDetail;D=FAA-2014-0285; or in 

person at the Docket Management 

Facility between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., 

Monday through Friday, except Federal 

holidays. The AD docket contains this 

AD, any comments received, and other 

information. The street address for the 

Docket Operations office (telephone 

(800) 647–5527) is in the ADDRESSES

section. 

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39 

Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation 

safety, Incorporation by reference, 

Safety. 

Adoption of the Amendment 

Accordingly, under the authority 

delegated to me by the Administrator, 

the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as 

follows: 

PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS 

DIRECTIVES 

■ 1. The authority citation for part 39 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701. 

§ 39.13 [Amended] 

■ 2. The FAA amends § 39.13 by 

removing Airworthiness Directive (AD) 

2012–26–15, Amendment 39–17310 (78 

FR 1735, January 9, 2013), and adding 

the following new AD: 

2012–26–15 R1 Honeywell International 

Inc.: Amendment 39–17990; Docket No. 

FAA–2014–0285; Directorate Identifier 

2014–NM–035–AD. 

(a) Effective Date 

This AD becomes effective December 3, 

2014. 

(b) Affected ADs 

This action rescinds AD 2012–26–15, 

Amendment 39–17310 (78 FR 1735, January 

9, 2013). 

(c) Applicability 

This action applies to air data pressure 

transducers, as installed in air data 

computers (ADC), air data modules (ADM), 

air data attitude heading reference systems 

(ADAHRS), and digital air data computers 

(DADC) having the part numbers and serial 

numbers identified in Honeywell Alert 

Service Bulletin ADM/ADC/ADAHRS–34– 

A01, dated November 6, 2012. This appliance 

is installed on, but not limited to, the aircraft 

specified in paragraphs (c)(1) through (c)(16) 

of this AD. 

(1) Airbus Model A318–111, –112, –121, 

and –122 airplanes. 

(2) Airbus Model A319–111, –112, –113, 

–114, –115, –131, –132, and –133 airplanes. 

(3) Airbus Model A320–111, –211, –212, 

–214, –231, –232, and –233 airplanes. 

(4) Airbus Model A321–111, –112, –131, 

–211, –212, –213, –231, and –232 airplanes. 

(5) Airbus Model A330–223F, –243F, –201, 

–202, –203, –223, –243, –301, –302, –303, 

–321, –322, –323, –341, –342, and –343 

airplanes. 

(6) Airbus Model A340–211, –212, –213, 

–311, –312, –313, –541, and –642 airplanes. 

(7) AGUSTA S.p.A. Model AW139 

helicopters. 

(8) Bell Helicopter Textron Canada Limited 

Model 429 helicopters. 

(9) The Boeing Company Model 767–200, 

–300, –300F, and –400ER series airplanes; 

and Model 777–200, –200LR, –300, –300ER, 

and 777F series airplanes. 

(10) Cessna Aircraft Company Model 

560XL (560 Excel and 560 XLS) airplanes. 

(11) Dassault Aviation Model MYSTERE– 

FALCON 900 airplanes and Model FALCON 

2000 airplanes. 

(12) Empresa Brasileira de Aeronautica 

S.A. (EMBRAER) Model EMB–135BJ 

airplanes. 

(13) Gulfstream Aerospace Corporation 

Model GIV–X and GV–SP airplanes. 

(14) Learjet Inc. Model 45 airplanes. 

(15) PILATUS AIRCRAFT LTD. Model PC– 

12/47E airplanes. 

(16) Viking Air Limited (Type Certificate 

previously held by Bombardier Inc.; de 

Havilland, Inc.) Model (Twin Otter) DHC–6– 

400 airplanes. 

(d) Subject 

Air Transport Association (ATA) of 

America Code 34, Navigation. 

Issued in Renton, Washington, on 

September 23, 2014. 

Dionne Palermo, 

Acting Manager, Transport Airplane 

Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service. 

[FR Doc. 2014–24558 Filed 10–28–14; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910–13–P 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

Federal Aviation Administration 

14 CFR Part 39 

[Docket No. FAA–2014–0431; Directorate 

Identifier 2013–NM–041–AD; Amendment 

39–18003; AD 2014–21–09] 

RIN 2120–AA64 

Airworthiness Directives; The Boeing 

Company Airplanes 

AGENCY: Federal Aviation 

Administration (FAA), DOT. 

ACTION: Final rule. 

SUMMARY: We are superseding 

Airworthiness Directive (AD) 2005–14– 

07 for certain The Boeing Company 

Model 727, 727C, 727–100, 727–100C, 

727–200, and 727–200F series airplanes. 

AD 2005–14–07 required repetitive 

inspections of the carriage attach fittings 

on the inboard and outboard foreflaps of 

each wing for cracking and other 

discrepancies, and corrective actions if 

necessary. This new AD requires 

reducing certain repetitive inspection 

intervals for the inboard and outboard 


rmajette on DSK2TPTVN1PROD with RULES