alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
U.S. flag
              An official website of the United States government





---

close


back button
 Singapore source
 Print Share
 Basic Facts Population
 People per sq. km
 Males per 100 females
 Children per woman
 Goods exported from U.S.
 Goods imported to U.S.
 Change in exports from U.S. for 2014 to 2023
 A Closer Look Source
 Comparisons
 Compared to the U.S.
 Compared to the World
 K = Thousands
                M = Millions
                B = Billions
  Merchandise Trade U.S. Trade in Manufactured Goods
 Top Exported Goods by U.S. State or Territory
 Population Current and Projected Population
 Population by Age and Sex
 Source and Notes Source: U.S. Census Bureau, International Database (demographic data) and USA Trade Online (trade data); Central Intelligence Agency, The World Fact Book (country reference maps). This application presents data for 228 countries and areas of the world with a 2024 population of 5,000 or more. For eleven of those countries and areas, only demographic data are presented. "Data not available" indicates that data are not available from this application.  In such instances, data may be available elsewhere at the census.gov website. Trade figures presented for France do not include data for overseas departments French Guiana, Guadeloupe, Martinique, Mayotte, and Reunion but do include data for dependencies Saint Barthelemy and Saint Martin.  Trade figures for the United Kingdom include data for crown dependencies Guernsey, Isle of Man, and Jersey. To learn more about world population projections, go to Notes on the World Population Clock. To learn more about international trade data, go to Guide to Foreign Trade Statistics. All trade figures are in U.S. dollars on a nominal basis.


CONNECT WITH US
 Information Quality
                    Data Linkage Infrastructure
                    Data Protection and Privacy Policy
                    Accessibility      
                    FOIA
                    Inspector General
                    No FEAR Act
                    U.S. Department of Commerce
                    USA.gov
  Measuring America's People, Places, and Economy
No. 00-7304.

#### Caston *v.*Cain, Warden.

C. A. 5th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.
#### Gerald J. MAY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 73-442.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Feb. 22, 1974.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
# C_2014371EN.01001801.xml

| 18.10.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 371/18 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.10.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 371/18

---

Notice of the impending expiry of certain anti-dumping measures

(2014/C 371/11)

1.   As provided for in Article 11(2) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009 of 30 November 2009 on protection against dumped imports from countries not members of the European Community (1), the Commission gives notice that, unless a review is initiated in accordance with the following procedure, the anti-dumping measures mentioned below will expire on the date mentioned in the table below.

1

2.   Procedure

Procedure

Union producers may lodge a written request for a review. This request must contain sufficient evidence that the expiry of the measures would be likely to result in a continuation or recurrence of dumping and injury.

Should the Commission decide to review the measures concerned, importers, exporters, representatives of the exporting country and Union producers will then be provided with the opportunity to amplify, rebut or comment on the matters set out in the review request.

3.   Time limit

Time limit

Union producers may submit a written request for a review on the above basis, to reach the European Commission, Directorate-General for Trade (Unit H-1), CHAR 4/39, 1000 Brussels, Belgium (2) at any time from the date of the publication of the present notice but no later than three months before the date mentioned in the table below.

2

4.   This notice is published in accordance with Article 11(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009.

| Product | Country(ies) of origin or exportation | Measures | Reference | Date of expiry (3) |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Certain cargo scanning systems | The People’s Republic of China | Anti-dumping duty | Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 510/2010 (OJ L 150, 16.6.2010, p. 1). | 17.6.2015 |

Product

Country(ies) of origin or exportation

Measures

Reference

Date of expiry (3)

3

Certain cargo scanning systems

The People’s Republic of China

Anti-dumping duty

Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 510/2010 (OJ L 150, 16.6.2010, p. 1).

17.6.2015

---

(1)  OJ L 343, 22.12.2009, p. 51.

1

(2)  Fax +32 22956505.

2

(3)  The measure expires at midnight of the day mentioned in this column.

3

---
D^.I^^^3DIN6IPI^LI^

CO^TY^1111716^'S O^^C^

Lisa P. Jackson, Administrator 

United States Environmental Protection Agency Headquarters 

Ariel Rios Building 

1200 Pennsylvania Avenue NW 

Mail Code 1IOIA 

Washington, DC 20460 

Re: South Carolina Petition for Reconsideration: 2008 Ozone NAAQS Designations 

Dear Administrator Jackson: 

On April 30, 2012, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) designated the eastern part of York 

County, South Carolina "nonattainment" for the 2008 8-hour ozone National Ambient Air Quality 

Standard (NAAQS). The EPA included this portion of York County in the Charlotte-Gastonia-Salisbury, 

NC-SC (Charlotte) nonattainment area based on their belief that this part of York County contributed to 

the ozone violations in Charlotte. 

After consultation with the South Carolina Department of Health and Environmental Control (DHEC) 

along with other private stakeholders and public jurisdictions in the area, York County believes this 

determination was rushed and made without adequate time to fully consider DHECs submissions, that the 

EPA provided insufficient consultation and detail in its Technical Support Documentation (TSD) to give 

us a clear understanding of the rationale used in making this decision, and, further, that there was an 

inconsistent application of scientific rationale. Consequently, the York County Council has authorized 

me to submit this letter of support; joining DHEC in their request that the EPA reconsider this decision in 

light of the Petition for Reconsideration referenced above as was submitted by DHEC to the EPA on July 

20, 2Q12-

James E. Baker 

York County Manager 

cc: Bill Harris, Chief, Catawba Indian Nation 

Randy Imler, Executive Director, Catawba Council of Governments 

Danny Funderburk, Mayor, Fort Mill, South Carolina 

George Sheppard, Mayor, Tega Cay, South Carolina 

Doug Echols, Mayor, Rock Hill, South Carolina 

Myra C. Reece, Chief, Bureau of Air Quality, DI-IEC 

6 South Congress Street, Post Office Box 66, York, South Carolina 29745-0066

Telephone: (803) 684-8511 Fax: (803) 684-8550 Web: www.yorkcountygov.com
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

We hereby consent to the use in this Registration Statement on Form S-1 of our
reports dated July 28, 2000, relating to the consolidated financial statements
of Roxio, Inc., and July 14, 2000, relating to the financial statements of Wild
File, Inc., which appear in such Registration Statement. We also consent to the
references to us under the heading "Experts" in such Registration Statement.

/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

San Jose, California
September 20, 2000
<PAGE>   1

                                                                      EXHIBIT 21

                         SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT

     The following is a list of all subsidiaries of the Registrant at July 31,
1999 owned by the Registrant or one or more of its other subsidiaries:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                STATE OR COUNTRY
CORPORATE NAME OF SUBSIDIARY                                    OF INCORPORATION
----------------------------                                  --------------------
<S>                                                           <C>
Veritas Energy Services Inc.................................  Canada
Veritas DGC Land Ltd........................................  Canada
Canex Information Services Ltd..............................  Canada
Veritas Geoservices Ltd.....................................  Canada
Veritas Energy Services (US) Inc............................  Canada
Veritas Energy Services Inc.................................  Canada
Digicon Geophysical Corp....................................  Delaware
Veritas DGC Asia Pacific Ltd................................  Delaware
Veritas DGC Ltd.............................................  United Kingdom
Veritas DGC Australia (Pty) Ltd.............................  Australia
Veritas DGC Land Inc........................................  Delaware
Veritas Seismic S.A.........................................  Venezuela
Veritas DGC (Malaysia) Sdn. Bhd.............................  Malaysia
Veritas DGC (B) Sdn Bhd.....................................  Brunei
Veritas Geophysical Inc.....................................  Delaware
Veritas DGC Land Guatemala S.A..............................  Guatemala
Digicon de Venezuela C.A....................................  Venezuela
Digicon (Nigeria) Ltd.......................................  Nigeria
Veritas DGC Singapore Pte. Ltd..............................  Singapore
P.T. Digicon Mega Pratama...................................  Indonesia
Digital Exploration (Nigeria) Limited.......................  Nigeria
Seismic Company of America, Inc.............................  Delaware
Euroseis, Inc...............................................  Delaware
Veritas Geophysical I.......................................  Cayman Islands
Veritas Geophysical II......................................  Cayman Islands
Veritas Geophysical III.....................................  Cayman Islands
Veritas Geophysical IV......................................  Cayman Islands
Veritas Geophysical do Brasil, Ltda.........................  Brazil
Digicon Finance N.V.........................................  Netherlands Antilles
VTS Properties, Inc.........................................  Delaware
Geophysical Services Inc....................................  Delaware
Digicon Sub Corp............................................  Delaware
Veritas Geophysical (Norway) AS.............................  Norway
674916 Alberta Ltd..........................................  Canada
Time Seismic Exchange Ltd...................................  Canada
</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-7691

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

KENNETH HAWKINS,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Anderson. G. Ross Anderson, Jr., District

Judge. (CR-94-32, CA-96-2098-8-13)

Submitted: October 7, 1997 Decided: October 28, 1997

Before ERVIN and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Kenneth Hawkins, Appellant Pro Se. Elizabeth Jean Howard, OFFICE

OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Greenville, South Carolina, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying

his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1997).

We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district

court. United States v. Hawkins, Nos. CR-94-32; CA-96-2098-8-13

(D.S.C. Aug. 14, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

DISMISSED
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of VR Holdings, Inc. for the fiscal quarter ending December 31, 2012, I, John E. Baker, Chief Executive Officer of VR Holdings, Inc., hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that:

1.

Such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ending December 31, 2012, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.

The information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ending December 31, 2012, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of VR Holdings, Inc.

Date: February 19, 2013.

/s/ John E. Baker

John E. Baker, Chief Executive Officer of VR Holdings, Inc
Motion Granted; Appeal Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed December 

4, 2018.

In The 

Fourteenth Court of Appeals 

NO. 14-18-00914-CR

RACHEL NICOLE RYAN, Appellant 

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee 

On Appeal from the 25th District Court 

Guadalupe County, Texas 

Trial Court Cause No. 16-2227-CR-C 

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N 

Appellant Rachel Nicole Ryan has signed and filed a written motion to 

withdraw her notice of appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.2. Because this court has not 

delivered an opinion, we grant appellant’s motion and dismiss the appeal. 

PER CURIAM 

Panel consists of Justices Boyce, Christopher, and Jewell 

Do Not Publish – Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b)
U.S. flag
              An official website of the United States government Skip to main content   end of header Census.gov Newsroom Releases Manufacturing
 Newsroom Archive
 Skip left menu navigation
 About the Newsroom
 				Facts for Features
 				**News Releases**
 				Press Kits
 				Tip Sheets
 Release Information CB12-186 **Contact:**  Adria ThomasPublic Information Office
301-763-3030
 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:  MONDAY, OCT. 1, 2012 Media Advisory — Census Bureau Participates in Manufacturing Day Oct. 5 in San Diego What:
 The U.S. Census Bureau is participating in  Manufacturing Day with Workshops for Warriors, a San Diego-based nonprofit  organization dedicated to providing free job training and certification to  veterans. Manufacturing Day has been designed to expand knowledge about and improve  general public perception of manufacturing careers and manufacturing's value to  the U.S. economy. Facility tours and presentations will begin immediately  following the opening ceremony. The Census Bureau measures the nation's  manufacturing sector through its economic indicators, manufacturing surveys,  the upcoming 2012 Economic Census and other statistics.
 When:
 Friday, Oct. 5, 2012; 10:30 a.m. to 3 p.m. (PDT)
 Who:
 Hernan Luis y  Prado, founder, Workshops for Warriors
Rodney Grover, senior development  officer, Society Manufacturing Engineers Education Foundation
Mendel Gayle, chief, Manufacturing and Construction  Division, U.S. Census Bureau
 Where:
 Workshops for Warriors
  2970 Main Street
  San Diego, CA  92113 For more information and to register, go to http://www.mfgday.com/event/13/workshops-for-warriors-facility-tour-presentation. For  more information on the 2012 Economic Census, go to http://www.business.census.gov.
  CONNECT WITH US

Information Quality
                    Data Linkage Infrastructure
                    Data Protection and Privacy Policy
                    Accessibility      
                    FOIA
                    Inspector General
                    No FEAR Act
                    U.S. Department of Commerce
                    USA.gov
                   Measuring America's People, Places, and Economy
#### Albert LEROY, individually and as natural tutor of the minor, Susan Doris Leroy, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Patsy K. COOPER et al., Defendants-Appellees.

No. 3483.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Third Circuit.

Aug. 20, 1971.

Whitehead & McCoy by Kenneth D. McCoy, Natchitoches, for plaintiff-appellant.

Bodenheimer, Jones, Klotz & Simmons by G. M. Bodenheimer, Jr. and Gordon E. Rountree of Cook, Clark, Egan, Yancey & King, Shreveport, for defendants-appellees.

Before SAVOY, CULPEPPER and MILLER, JJ.

SAVOY, Judge.

This is the companion case to the case of Lewis v. Cooper, et al., 251 So.2d 805 (La.App. 3 Cir. 1971) rendered this date. See that case for a discussion of the facts and the holding.

For the reasons assigned in said companion case, the judgment of the district court is affirmed. All costs of appeal are assessed against plaintiff.

Affirmed.
#### STATE of Florida, Appellant, v. Stuart CLYDE, Appellee.

No. 73-756.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Feb. 15, 1974.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

WENDELL GRAVES,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 104 EAL 2018

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 26th day of June, 2018

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED

.
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk's Office, Atlanta, August 25, 2021. I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written. , Clerk. 

# Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA, August 25, 2021 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order A22D0011. SEDRICK WILSON v. THE STATE. Upon consideration of the Application for Discretionary Appeal, it is ordered that it be hereby DENIED.
LC NUMBERS: 2017CR03039
# C_2013272EN.01000401.xml

| 20.9.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 272/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.9.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 272/4

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.6960 — SNCF/COMSA-EMTE/CRT)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2013/C 272/02

On 16 September 2013, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32013M6960. EUR-Lex is the online access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32013M6960. EUR-Lex is the online access to the European law.

---
Exhibit



Exhibit 10.43



AMENDMENT TO 
ASHLAND INC. SUPPLEMENTAL DEFINED 
CONTRIBUTION PLAN FOR CERTAIN EMPLOYEES


WHEREAS, Ashland Inc. amended and restated the Ashland Inc. Supplemental Defined Contribution Plan for Certain Employees (the “Plan”) effective January 1, 2015; and
WHEREAS, the Personnel and Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of Ashland Global Holdings Inc. (the “Committee”) approved the freeze of the Plan effective September 30, 2016; and
WHEREAS, Section 9.1 of the Plan permits the amendment of the Plan;
NOW, THEREFORE, pursuant to Section 9.1 of the Plan and the approval of the Committee, the Plan is hereby amended effective September 30, 2016 as follows:
1.    Section 3.1 is amended by the addition of the following at the end thereof:
“Notwithstanding the foregoing, participation in the Plan is closed and frozen as to new Participants effective September 30, 2016, and no Eligible Employees shall commence Plan participation after September 30, 2016.”
2.    The following new Section 4.1(c) is added to the Plan:
“(c)    Freeze of Substitute Contribution.  Notwithstanding the foregoing provisions of this Section 4.1, no Substitute Contributions shall be credited to Participants’ Accounts with respect to Participants’ post-September 30, 2016, Incentive Compensation, Excess Base Compensation and Excess Base Compensation Deferrals.”
3.    Section 4.2(a) is amended by the addition of the following at the end thereof:
“The foregoing Performance Retirement Contribution provision shall only apply to Participants’ pre-October 1, 2016, Incentive Compensation, Excess Base Compensation and Excess Base Compensation Deferrals.”
4.    The following new Section 4.2(b)(vi) is added to the Plan:
“(vi)    Notwithstanding the foregoing, no Basic Retirement Contributions shall be credited to Participants’ Accounts with respect to Participants’ post-September 30, 2016, Incentive Compensation, Excess Base Compensation and Excess Base Compensation Deferrals.”











5.    Section 4.2(c) is amended by the addition of the following at the end thereof:
“Notwithstanding the foregoing, no Discretionary Profit Sharing Contributions shall be made after September 30, 2016.”
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Ashland Global Holdings Inc. has caused its duly authorized officer to execute this Amendment to Ashland Inc. Supplemental Defined Contribution Plan for Certain Employees on the date set forth below.


ASHLAND GLOBAL HOLDINGS INC.




/s/ Peter J. Ganz
By:_____________________________________
Peter J. Ganz
Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary




- 2 -
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 3279

To suspend temporarily the duty on ranitidine hydrochloride (bulk and dosage

forms).

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

OCTOBER 13, 1993

Mr. VALENTINE (for himself, Mr. PRICE of North Carolina, and Mr. LANCASTER) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

A BILL

To suspend temporarily the duty on ranitidine hydrochloride

(bulk and dosage forms).

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. RANITIDINE HYDROCHLORIDE.

4 Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized Tar5 iff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting

6 in numerical sequence the following new heading:
2

•HR 3279 IH

‘‘ 9902.31.12 N[2-[[[5-

[(dimethylamino)methyl]-2-

furanyl]methyl]thio]ethyl]-

N’-methyl-2-nitro-1,1-

ethenediamine, hydrochloride (ranitidine hydrochloride-bulk form, provided for in subheading

2932.19.50007) (ranitidine

hydrochloride-dosage form,

provided for in subheading

3004.90.60) ........................ Free No change No change On or before

12/31/95 ’’.

1 SEC. 2. EFFECTIVE DATE.

2 The amendment made by section 1 applies with re3 spect to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for

4 consumption, on or after the 15th day after the date of

5 enactment of this Act.

Æ