alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 3284

Entitled the ‘‘Asylum Abuse Prevention Act of 1993’’.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

OCTOBER 14, 1993

Mrs. BENTLEY (for herself, Mr. STUMP, Mr. GALLEGLY, Mr. LEVY, Mr.

BARTLETT of Maryland, and Mr. MACHTLEY) introduced the following

bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

A BILL

Entitled the ‘‘Asylum Abuse Prevention Act of 1993’’.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. LIMITATION ON ASYLUM.

4 Section 208 of the Immigration and Nationality Act

5 (8 U.S.C. 1158) is amended by adding at the end the fol6 lowing:

7 ‘‘(e) Notwithstanding subsection (a), an alien, who

8 departs the country of nationality (or in the case of an

9 alien having no nationality, the country in which the alien

10 last habitually resided) and passes through another coun-
2

HR 3284 IH

1 try which provides asylum or safe haven to refugees may

2 not apply for or be granted asylum in the United States.’’.

Æ
Exhibit 32(a)

**THE DAYTON POWER AND LIGHT COMPANY**

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned officers of The Dayton Power and Light Company  (the“Issuer”) hereby certify that the Issuer’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2003, whichthis certificate accompanies, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of1934 and that the information contained therein fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of the Issuer.

A signed original of this writtenstatement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating,acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed formwithin the electronic version of this statement required by Section 906, hasbeen provided to the Issuer and will be retained by the Issuer and furnished tothe SEC or its staff upon request.

Signed:

| /s/ JAMES V. MAHONEY                  |   |
|---------------------------------------|--------|
|                                       |   |
| James V. Mahoney                      |
| President and Chief Executive Officer |

Date:  November 5, 2004
#### LOUISIANA POWER AND LIGHT COMPANY v. John C. B. JUMONVILLE.

No. 7039.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana. First Circuit.

May 29, 1967.

Rehearing Denied June 30, 1967.

Andrew P. Carter, of Monroe & Le-mann, New Orleans, Charles O. Dupont, Plaquemine, for appellant.

R. Gordon Kean, Jr., and Robert A. Hawthorne, Jr., of Sanders, Miller, Downing & Kean, Baton Rouge, William O. Templet of Middleton & Templet, Plaque-mine, for appellee.

Before LOTTINGER, REID, and SAR-TAIN, JJ.

REID, Judge.

This case was consolidated for trial in the District Court, separate judgments to be rendered and likewise consolidated for argument and submission in this Court, with separate decisions to be rendered.

For the reasons this day handed down in the companion case of Louisiana Power and Light Company v. Ristroph, 200 So.2d 14, No. 7038, the judgment of the Lower Court is affirmed.

Affirmed.
#### The People of the State of New York, Plaintiff, *v.*Anonymous, Defendant.

County Court, Columbia County,

December 9, 1953.

*932
      *J ohn N. McLaren, District Attorney,*for plaintiff.

*Michael Le Satvyer*for defendant.

Connor, J.

The defendant is charged with the crime of burglary third degree, allegedly committed in the County of Columbia on the 1st day of July, 1952. On the 1st day of August, 1952, one month after the alleged crime in Columbia County, but over a year prior to his being indicted by the Grand Jury of Columbia County, he was convicted in the State of Massachusetts of the crime of breaking and entering. The question before this court is the interpretation of section 913-e of the Code of Criminal Procedure, which apparently has never been interpreted. That section provides as follows: “ For the purpose of this title, the term *‘*youth ' shall mean a minor who has reached the age of sixteen years or over but has not reached the age of nineteen years; and the term ' youthful offender ' shall mean a youth who has committed a crime not punishable by death or life imprisonment, who has not previously been convicted of a felony, and who is adjudged a youthful offender pursuant to the provisions of the following sections."

While the defendant at this time has been convicted of a felony in the State of Massachusetts, a State which apparently has not adopted the youthful offenders' statute, he, nevertheless, at the time that he is alleged to have committed this crime in the county of Columbia, had not previously been convicted of a felony.

I hold that the term *“*previously been convicted of a felony " applies to the time of the commission of the crime, for which the youth seeks the benefit of the Youthful Offenders' Act, and not as to his status at the time of apprehension or indictment for the crime.

This is the same reasoning as has been applied by the courts to the interpretation of the statutes dealing with second, third and fourth offenders. (See *People*v. *Plath,*71 N. Y. S. 2d 667.)
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3114 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3114

To authorize the Secretary of Transportation to issue a certificate of 
   documentation with appropriate endorsement for employment in the 
    coastwise trade of the United States for the vessel ABORIGINAL.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 21, 1993

   Mr. Reed introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
               Committee on Merchant Marine and Fisheries

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To authorize the Secretary of Transportation to issue a certificate of 
   documentation with appropriate endorsement for employment in the 
    coastwise trade of the United States for the vessel ABORIGINAL.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled, That notwithstanding 
section 27 of the Merchant Marine Act, 1920 (46 App. U.S.C. 883), the 
Act of June 19, 1886 (46 App. U.S.C. 289), and section 12106 of title 
46, United States Code, the Secretary of Transportation may issue a 
certificate of documentation with appropriate endorsement for 
employment in the coastwise trade of the United States for the vessel 
ABORIGINAL (United States official number 942118).

                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 23


                   CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the incorporation of our
report dated March 11, 1998, on the December 31, 1997 consolidated financial
statements, included in this form 10-K, into the Company's previously filed
Registration Statement File Numbers 33-18187, 33-30522, 33-43131, 2-88509,
33-54842, 33-54844, 33-54846, 33-54850, 33-62253, 33-63215, and 333-31707.

/s/ ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP

ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP

Houston, Texas 
March 20, 1998
#### Solomon SCHWARTZ, as Personal Representative of Sara Schwartz, and Solomon Schwartz, Individually, Appellant, v. AMERICAN HOME ASSURANCE COMPANY, a Foreign Corporation and Vincent Grande, Appellees.

No. 75-701.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Sept. 1, 1978.

Before HAVERFIELD, C. J., KEHOE, J., and CHARLES CARROLL (Ret.), Associate Judge.

ORDER ON MANDATE

PER CURIAM.

Whereas, the judgment of this court was entered on May 11, 1976 (334 So.2d 268) affirming the summary final judgment of *969the circuit court of Dade County, in the above styled cause, and

Whereas, on review of this court’s judgment, by certiorari, the Supreme Court of Florida by its opinion and judgment filed May 4, 1978, 360 So.2d 383, and mandate now lodged in this court, quashed this court’s judgment;

Now, Therefore, It is Ordered that the mandate of this court heretofore issued in this cause on July 6, 1976 is withdrawn, the judgment of this court filed May 11,1976 is vacated and the said opinion and judgment of the Supreme Court of Florida is herewith made the opinion and judgment of this court, the summary final judgment of the trial court appealed herein is reversed and the cause is remanded for further proceedings not inconsistent with the opinion and judgment of the Supreme Court of Florida. Costs allowed shall be taxed in the trial court (Rule 3.16(b), Florida Appellate Rules).
Union Calendar No. 148

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 3085

[Report No. 103–266]

A BILL

To improve administrative services and support

for other purposes.provided to the National Forest Foundation, and

SEPTEMBER 28, 1993

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the

State of the Union and ordered to be printed
IB

Union Calendar No. 148

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 3085

[Report No. 103–266]

To improve administrative services and support provided to the National

Forest Foundation, and for other purposes.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

SEPTEMBER 15, 1993

Mr. DE LA GARZA introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Agriculture

SEPTEMBER 28, 1993

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union

and ordered to be printed

A BILL

To improve administrative services and support provided to

the National Forest Foundation, and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘National Forest Foun5 dation Act Amendment Act of 1993’’.
2

HR 3085 RH

1 SEC. 2. PURPOSE.

2 It is the purpose of this Act—

3 (1) to provide for startup and matching funds

4 for project expenses to carry out the National Forest

5 Foundation Act; and

6 (2) to extend the funding authorization for

7 startup expenses for 1 year.

8 SEC. 3. ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES AND SUPPORT.

9 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 405 of the National For10 est Foundation Act (16 U.S.C. 583j–3) is amended—

11 (1) in subsection (a)—

12 (A) by inserting ‘‘, project,’’ after ‘‘admin13 istrative’’; and

14 (B) by striking ‘‘following the date of en15 actment of this title’’ and inserting ‘‘beginning

16 October 1, 1992’’; and

17 (2) in subsection (b)—

18 (A) by striking ‘‘from the date of enact19 ment of this title’’ and inserting ‘‘beginning Oc20 tober 1, 1992’’; and

21 (B) by inserting ‘‘and project’’ after ‘‘ad22 ministrative’’.

23 (b) TECHNICAL AMENDMENT.—Section 410(b) of

24 such Act (16 U.S.C. 583j–8(b)) is amended by striking

25 ‘‘following the date of enactment of this title,’’ and insert26 ing ‘‘beginning October 1, 1992,’’.
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of The Dixie Group, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the year ended December 26, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Daniel K. Frierson, the Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:



(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



/s/DANIEL K. FRIERSON

Daniel K. Frierson, Chief Executive Officer
Date:   March 3, 2010



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to The Dixie Group, Inc. and will be retained by The Dixie Group, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
From: Christopher Bolduc [mailto:cabolduc@lbl.gov]

Sent: Thursday, November 03, 2011 3:27 PM

To: Richard Parker

Cc: rick.anderson@faypwc.com; tballo@earthjustice.org; ScottB@lvmetals.com;

john.caskey@nema.org; jerry.corkran@cooperindustries.com;

john.cymbalsky@ee.doe.gov; adelaski@standardsasap.org; Teckman@nwcouncil.org;

gbf1@pge.com; carlos.gaytan@ge.com; rgreeson@federalpacific.com;

bruce.r.hirsch@bge.com; jhodge@howard.com; mhyland@appanet.org;

dave.millure@metglas.com; snadel@aceee.org; wes.patterson@us.abb.com;

Eric.Petersen@aksteel.com; Raymond.Polinski@atimetals.com;

artrosenfeld@gmail.com; srosenstock@eei.org; rroy@nrdc.org;

robert.saint@nreca.coop; chuck.simmons@pgnmail.com; BermanEconomics@gmail.com;

Daniel.Cohen@hq.doe.gov; greg.coulter405@gmail.com; Jim.creevy@nema.org;

ahofmann@publicpower.org; pkumar@publicpower.org; jmauer@standardsasap.org;

Aaron.Meyers@cooperindustries.com; jrossetti@mlgw.org; Paul.Ryan@hitmet.com;

jerry.schoen@aksteel.com; bsmith@federalpacific.com; mwal tner@nrdc.org;

kwinder@mleainc.com; cabolduc@lbl.gov; Brian Coffey; kcoughlin@lbl.gov;

brenda.edwards@ee.doe.gov; jeremiah.freeman@ee.doe.gov; Caitlin Johnson; Zhimei

Luo; emily.marchetti@ee.doe.gov; Michael Rivest; gjrosenquist@lbl.gov;

charlied@uus.org; phopkinson@hvolt.com; James.Lass@cleco.com;

maheshsampat@bellsouth.net; DYoung@energy

‐ solution.com;

chad.kennedy@us.schneider

‐ electric.com; eduardorobles@eaton.com;

vijay.tendulkar@onyxpower.com; thomas.patzner@us.schneider

‐ electric.com;

carlosgsiqueiros@eaton.com; Raba, Jim

Subject: MV Liquid

‐ immersed LCC and NIA Results Update

All,

It has been pointed out to me, that some of the la bels in the document were

incorrect and may have caused unnecessary confusion. Also, there was an error in

how TSL 4 (domestically available material) was defined for designs lines 1 and

4; this only impacts the results presented on pages 18 and 19.

These oversights have been addressed in the att ached file.

Thank you,

‐ Chris Bolduc

On Wed, Nov 2, 2011 at 7:23 PM, Christopher Bolduc <cabolduc@lbl.gov> wrote:

> Dear Committee Members,

>

> Please find the draft LCC and NIA results for liquid

‐ immersed

> medium

‐ voltage transformers (design lines 1

‐ 5) attached.

>

> A summary of ch anges and additional sensitivities will be distributed

> before next week's meeting.

>

> Thank you,

> ‐‐ Chris Bolduc

>

> ‐‐‐‐

> Chris Bolduc> Energy Efficiency Standards Group

> Environmental Energy Technologies Division Lawrence Berkeley National

> Laboratory t. 416

‐ 535

‐ 7546 c. 647

‐ 832

‐ 4021

>

‐‐

‐‐‐‐

Chris Bolduc

Energy Efficiency Standards Group

Environmental Energy Technologies Division Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory

t. 416

‐ 535

‐ 7546 c. 647

‐ 832

‐ 4021
# C_2014084EN.01000501.xml

| 22.3.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 84/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.3.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 84/5

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

21 March 2014

2014/C 84/04

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,3780 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 141,07 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4646 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,83570 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 8,8541 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,2182 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,3695 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 27,458 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 312,59 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,1975 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,4848 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 3,0862 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,5199 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,5435 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 10,6960 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,6146 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,7567 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 488,64 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 14,9968 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 8,5792 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,6625 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 15 741,70 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,5591 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 62,385 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 50,0300 |
| THB | Thai baht | 44,592 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 3,2138 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 18,2695 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 83,9547 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,3780

JPY

Japanese yen

141,07

DKK

Danish krone

7,4646

GBP

Pound sterling

0,83570

SEK

Swedish krona

8,8541

CHF

Swiss franc

1,2182

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,3695

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

27,458

HUF

Hungarian forint

312,59

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

PLN

Polish zloty

4,1975

RON

Romanian leu

4,4848

TRY

Turkish lira

3,0862

AUD

Australian dollar

1,5199

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,5435

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

10,6960

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,6146

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,7567

KRW

South Korean won

1 488,64

ZAR

South African rand

14,9968

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

8,5792

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,6625

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

15 741,70

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,5591

PHP

Philippine peso

62,385

RUB

Russian rouble

50,0300

THB

Thai baht

44,592

BRL

Brazilian real

3,2138

MXN

Mexican peso

18,2695

INR

Indian rupee

83,9547

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
#### Geraldine LAWMAN, Appellant, v. D. J. WHALEN et al., Appellees. Edward Cleveland SMITH, Appellant, v. D. J. WHALEN et al., Appellees.

Nos. N-491, N-490.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

March 28, 1972..

Dale E. Rice, of Campbell & Rice, Crest-view, for appellants.

Charles R. Timmel, of Timmel, Handley & Campbell, Ft. Walton Beach, for appel-lees.

PER CURIAM.

Appellants seek review of an adverse final judgment rendered in favor of appel-lees Whalen pursuant to a jury verdict in favor of the latter.

This litigation was instituted by appellants against the appellees to recover for injuries sustained in an automobile collision involving a car owned by the Whalens and driven by Janelle Kiernan, a minor. Janelle was a friend of the Whalen’s daughter, Phyllis. The factual issue which was tried by the jury was whether Janelle was driving the Whalen automobile with the consent of the daughter, Phyllis.

The jury rendered its verdict in favor of the plaintiffs against the defendant, Janelle Kiernan, but found a verdict in favor of the Whalen defendants. Inherent in the verdict favoring the Whalens was a finding of fact that Janelle Kiernan did not have the consent of her friend, Phyllis Whalen, to drive the car at the time the collision occurred.

Appellants contend that the trial court erroneously instructed the jury on the elements and nature of consent as it relates to the liability of an automobile owner for the use or misuse of the vehicle.

We have carefully reviewed the instructions given and those about which appellants complain and hold that the appellants were not prejudiced by the language of the instructions given since they more than fairly reflect the law of consent as it relates to the subject matter of this *498cause. We have also considered appellants’ contention that the number of instructions given on the issue of consent tended to unduly emphasize that particular facet of the case and was therefore prejudicial to the plaintiff. We hold that this contention is also without merit in light of the numerous instructions requested by appellants themselves on the subject. Moreover, no objections were made at the trial against the giving of the instructions now complained of or regarding the inundative effect of the charges raised in this appeal.

Having reviewed the record on appeal, and considered the briefs and arguments of counsel, and it appearing therefrom that appellants have failed to demonstrate error, the judgments reviewed herein are affirmed.

SPECTOR, C. J., and WIGGINTON and JOHNSON, JJ., concur.
#### Walter J. ZIMMERMAN and Dolores Zimmerman, Appellants, v. Philip C. LANGE and Emily S. Lange, Appellees.

No. 72-796.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Dec. 31, 1973.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
# C_2014008EN.01000601.xml

| 11.1.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 8/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.1.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 8/6

---

Special Report No 16/2013 ‘Taking stock of “single audit” and the Commission’s reliance on the work of national audit authorities in Cohesion’

2014/C 8/04

The European Court of Auditors hereby informs you that Special Report No 16/2013 ‘Taking stock of “single audit” and the Commission’s reliance on the work of national audit authorities in Cohesion’ has just been published.

The report can be accessed for consultation or downloading on the European Court of Auditors' website (http://eca.europa.eu).

A hard copy version of the report may be obtained free of charge on request to the Court of Auditors:

| European Court of Auditors |
| --- |
| Unit ‘Audit: Production of Reports’ |
| 12, rue Alcide de Gasperi |
| 1615 Luxembourg |
| LUXEMBOURG |
| Tel. +352 4398-1 |
| E-mail: eca-info@eca.europa.eu |

European Court of Auditors

Unit ‘Audit: Production of Reports’

12, rue Alcide de Gasperi

1615 Luxembourg

LUXEMBOURG

Tel. +352 4398-1

E-mail: eca-info@eca.europa.eu

or by filling in an electronic order form on EU-Bookshop.

---