alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 3094

To provide for the transfer of the Naval Hospital located at the Orlando

Naval Training Center, Florida, to the Department of Veterans Affairs

for use as an expanded ambulatory care center, a nursing home complex,

and a facility for related medical purposes.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

SEPTEMBER 21, 1993

Ms. BROWN of Florida introduced the following bill; which was referred jointly

to the Committees on Armed Services and Veterans’ Affairs

A BILL

To provide for the transfer of the Naval Hospital located

at the Orlando Naval Training Center, Florida, to the

Department of Veterans Affairs for use as an expanded

ambulatory care center, a nursing home complex, and

a facility for related medical purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. LAND TRANSFER, ORLANDO NAVAL HOSPITAL,

4 FLORIDA.

5 (a) TRANSFER REQUIRED.—The Secretary of the

6 Navy shall transfer the Orlando Naval Hospital described

7 in subsection (b), including all buildings and improve-
2

•HR 3094 IH

1 ments thereon, from the jurisdiction and control of the

2 Department of the Navy to the jurisdiction and control

3 of the Department of Veterans Affairs. The transfer re4 quired by this section shall be made without compensation

5 or reimbursement.

6 (b) DESCRIPTION OF LAND.—The real property re7 ferred to in subsection (a) is a tract of real property con8 sisting of the Orlando Naval Hospital and its supporting

9 functions, which occupy approximately 110 acres in the

10 City of Orlando, Florida, on the northeast corner of the

11 Naval Training Center Campus, just south of Winter

12 Park, Florida.

13 (c) USE OF PROPERTY.—The Secretary of Veterans

14 Affairs shall use the real property transferred pursuant

15 to subsection (a) as an expanded ambulatory care center,

16 a nursing home complex, and a facility for related medical

17 purposes.

18 (d) LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY.—The exact

19 acreage and legal description of the real property to be

20 transferred pursuant to subsection (a) shall be determined

21 by a survey that is satisfactory to the Secretary of the

22 Navy. The Secretary of Veterans Affairs shall bear the

23 cost of such survey.

24 (e) TIME FOR TRANSFER.—The transfer of real prop25 erty required by this section shall occur on a date agreed
3

•HR 3094 IH

1 upon by the Secretary of the Navy and the Secretary of

2 Veterans Affairs, but not later than one month after the

3 date on which the Secretary of the Navy closes the Or4 lando Naval Hospital.

Æ
# C_2014238EN.01000301.xml

| 23.7.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 238/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.7.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 238/3

---

Notice for the attention of the persons to whom restrictive measures provided for in Council Decision 2012/285/CFSP and Council Regulation (EU) No 377/2012 concerning restrictive measures directed against certain persons, entities and bodies threatening the peace, security or stability of the Republic of Guinea-Bissau apply

2014/C 238/02

The following information is brought to the attention of the persons that appear in Annexes II and III to Council Decision 2012/285/CFSP (1) and in Annex I to Council Regulation (EU) No 377/2012 (2) concerning restrictive measures directed against certain persons, entities and bodies threatening the peace, security or stability of the Republic of Guinea-Bissau.

1

2

The Council of the European Union, after having reviewed the list of persons designated in the abovementioned Annexes, has determined that the restrictive measures provided for in Decision 2012/285/CFSP and in Regulation (EU) No 377/2012 should continue to apply to those persons.

The attention of the persons concerned is drawn to the possibility of making an application to the competent authorities of the relevant Member State(s) as indicated on the websites in Annex II to Regulation (EU) No 377/2012, in order to obtain an authorisation to use frozen funds for basic needs or specific payments (cf. Article 4 of the Regulation).

The persons concerned may submit a request to the Council, together with supporting documentation, that the decision to include them on the above-mentioned lists should be reconsidered, by 30 April 2015, to the following address:

by 30 April 2015

| Council of the European Union |
| --- |
| General Secretariat |
| DG C 1C |
| Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175 |
| 1048 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |
| E-mail: sanctions@consilium.europa.eu |

Council of the European Union

General Secretariat

DG C 1C

Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175

1048 Bruxelles/Brussel

BELGIQUE/BELGIË

E-mail: sanctions@consilium.europa.eu

Any observations received will be taken into account for the purpose of the Council’s periodic review, in accordance with Article 5(2) of Decision 2012/285/CFSP and Article 11(4) of Regulation (EU) No 377/2012.

---

(1)  OJ L 142, 1.6.2012, p. 36.

1

(2)  OJ L 119, 4.5.2012, p. 4.

2

---
#### SONNENBLICK-GOLDMAN CORP., OF FLORIDA, et al., Appellants, v. Morris GREENBERG, Appellee. Morris GREENBERG, Appellant, v. SONNENBLICK-GOLDMAN CORP., OF FLORIDA, etc., et al., Appellees.

Nos. 73-388, 73-390.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Nov. 20, 1973.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
IN THE MATTER OF THE PETITION

FOR REINSTATEMENT OF DONALD SAUNDERS LITMAN TO THE MARYLAND BAR • IN THE
• COURT OF APPEALS
• OF MARYLAND
• Misc. Docket AG • No. 84 • September Term, 2015 ORDER The Court having considered the Petition for Reinstatement filed by Donald Saunders Litman, Bar Counsel's response thereto, and upon good cause shown, it is this 19th day of May, 2016 ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland a majority of the Court, that the petition be, and it is hereby, GRANTED, and that Donald Saunders Litman is hereby reinstated to the practice of law in Maryland, and it is further ORDERED, that the Clerk of this Court shall replace the name of Donald Saunders Litman on the register of the attorneys in this Court and certify that fact to the Trustees of the Client Protection Fund and to the Clerks of all judicial tribunals in this State. /s/ Mary Ellen Barbera Chief Judge
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     This  schedule  contains  summary  financial   information  extracted  from
financial  statements  for the twelve  month  period  ended May 31,  1999 and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1

<S>                                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              MAY-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 JUN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAY-31-1999
<CASH>                                         122,161
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  397,467
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    508,017
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               1,038,170
<PP&E>                                         334,397
<DEPRECIATION>                                 298,695
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 1,105,167
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          232,595
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       147,881
<OTHER-SE>                                     413,072
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   1,105,167
<SALES>                                        1,933,737
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               1,933,737
<CGS>                                          933,890
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  985,084
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               (3,217)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (51,194)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (67,438)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (67,438)
<EPS-BASIC>                                 (.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                 (.01)




</TABLE>
COURT OF CHANCERY

OF THE

STATE OF DELAWARE

ANDRE G. BOUCHARD

CHANCELLOR

LEONARD L. WILLIAMS JUSTICE CENTER

500 N. KING STREET, SUITE 11400

WILMINGTON, DELAWARE 19801-3734

November 27, 2019

Kevin R. Shannon, Esquire 

Potter Anderson & Corroon LLP 

1313 North Market Street 

Wilmington, DE 19801 

Jennifer C. Voss, Esquire 

Skadden Arps Slate Meagher 

& Flom LLP 

920 North King Street, 7th Floor 

Wilmington, DE 19801

Jeremy D. Eicher, Esquire 

Eicher Law LLC 

1007 North Orange Street, 4th Floor 

Wilmington, DE 19801

Frank E. Noyes, II, Esquire

Offit Kurman, P.A.

1201 N. Orange Suite, Suite 10E

Wilmington, DE 19801

RE: In re: TransPerfect Global, Inc.

Civil Action No. 9700-CB 

Elizabeth Elting v. Philip R. Shawe, et al. 

Civil Action No. 10449-CB

Dear Counsel:

Pending before the court is the second motion for certification of an 

interlocutory appeal that Respondents have filed within the past thirty days. This 

time, Respondents seek to appeal two orders the court entered on November 1, 2019 

(the “Second Orders”) arising out of the same dispute that was the subject of a 

Memorandum Opinion (“Opinion”) and Order (the “First Order”) issued on October 

17, 2019. 
In re TransPerfect Global, Inc., et al.

Civil Action Nos. 9700, 10449-CB

November 27, 2019

2

On November 18, 2019, the court denied Respondents’ motion to certify an 

interlocutory appeal of the Opinion and First Order (the “Interlocutory Order”). As 

explained in the Interlocutory Order, “the risk of piecemeal appeals is manifest” in 

this case.1 For this reason, the court expressed its view that an interlocutory appeal 

of the Opinion and the First Order and/or of the Second Orders made no sense until 

two other outstanding, directly-related matters had been adjudicated, namely “(i) the 

amount of the Contempt Fee Award and (ii) the resolution of any objections 

Respondents may make to the Fee Orders.”

2

 Thereafter, a single interlocutory 

appeal of all those rulings could be taken together.

The court’s calculus of the costs versus the benefits of an interlocutory appeal 

remains the same now as it did in the Interlocutory Order. Accordingly, for the 

reasons stated there, Respondents’ motion for certification of an interlocutory appeal 

of the Second Orders is DENIED. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Sincerely,

/s/ Andre G. Bouchard

Chancellor

AGB/gm

 

1 Dkt. 1410 ¶ 9.

2

Id. ¶¶ 9-10.
CONVERSION FACTORS FOR 

# f,.

.**.~** ,UNIFORM ANNUAL COST, EQUIVALENT FIRST COST. PRESENT WORTH 

# '1- & MULTIPLY GIVEN GIVEN DESIRED BY 

# , 

# -- UNIFORM ANNUAL COST UNIFORM ANNUAL COST 

### .;, ))**7~** EQUIVALENT



## . " I· °FIRST COST EQUIVALENT FIRST COST PRESENT WORTH UNIFORM ANNUAL COST 1 (FCR) (PWF) (FCR) EQUIVALENT FIRST COST PRESENT WORTH (FCR) (PWF)

PRESENT WORTH UNIFORM ANNUAL COST 1 (PWF)

1 PRESENT WORTH EQUIVALENT FIRST COST (PWF) (FCR) 

# g WHERE: FCR = FIXED UlARGE RATE PWF = PRESENT WORTH FACTOR OF A UNIFORM ANNUAL SERIES WHERE PWF MAY BE PWFE

. OR PWFS

. 

# A) hL**/~!/** -I (1] ) 

# LL )(Lv

- 16

- 

# ) FFe ). C1
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

    We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in this Registration
Statement on Form S-3 of our report dated October 21, 1999, except as to the
information presented under the heading "Revision" in Note 1, which is as of
June 12, 2000, relating to the financial statements and financial statement
schedule, which appears in Tyco International Ltd.'s Amendment No. 3 on
Form 10-K/A to Form 10-K for the year ended September 30, 1999. We also consent
to the reference to us under the heading "Experts" in such Registration
Statement.

                                          /s/ PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS

Hamilton, Bermuda
August 16, 2000
Exhibit








AMENDMENT 
TO 
CINCINNATI BELL INC. 
DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN FOR OUTSIDE DIRECTORS


This is an Amendment to the Cincinnati Bell Inc. Deferred Compensation Plan for Outside Directors (the “Plan”), which Amendment is effective as of October 30, 2015, to document resolutions adopted by the Board of Directors of Cincinnati Bell Inc. on October 30, 2015, as follows:


Section 8.1 of the Plan is hereby amended to read as follows: 


8.1    Right and Procedure to Terminate Plan.  CBI reserves the right to terminate the Plan, or portions thereof treated as aggregated under Code Section 409A, in their entirety. 


(a)Procedure to Terminate Plan.  The procedure for CBI to terminate the Plan is as follows.  In order to terminate the Plan, or aggregated portions of the Plan, the Board shall adopt resolutions, pursuant and subject to the regulations or by-laws of CBI and any applicable law, and either at a duly called meeting of the Board or by a written consent in lieu of a meeting, to terminate the Plan or aggregated portions thereof.  Such resolutions shall set forth therein the effective date of the Plan’s termination.


(b)Effect of Termination of Plan.  The Plan is hereby irrevocably terminated effective October 30, 2015 (the “Plan Termination Date”) with respect to all deferrals to the Plan made at the election of a Participant, and the Plan is hereby frozen with respect to phantom stock awards deferred under the Plan.  On and after the Plan Termination Date, Participants may not make deferrals under the Plan, and no Company contribution may be made under the Plan.  Each Participant’s remaining accrued and unpaid benefits, other than phantom stock benefits, shall be paid to the Participant in the form of a single lump sum payment on November 7, 2016, in accordance with plan termination rules in Treasury Regulation Section 1.409A-3(j)(4)(ix). Notwithstanding the foregoing, any benefits under the Plan that would be payable under the Plan prior to the Plan Termination Date if the Company had not taken action to terminate the Plan shall be paid in accordance with their original schedule.  Further, phantom stock deferred under the Plan shall continue to be subject to the Plan’s terms.  


IN ORDER TO EFFECT THE FOREGOING PLAN REVISIONS, the sponsor of the Plan, has caused its name to be subscribed to this Plan amendment, to be effective as of October 30, 2015.


	
					
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 

	 
	 
	 
	CINCINNATI BELL INC.

	 
	 
	 
	 
	 

	 
	 
	 
	By
	/s/ Christopher J. Wilson

	 
	 
	 
	 
	 

	 
	 
	 
	Title
	Vice President and General Counsel

	 
	 
	 
	 
	 

	 
	 
	 
	Date
	November 7, 2016
# C_2013172EN.01000101.xml

| 18.6.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 172/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.6.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 172/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.6876 — Sumitomo Electric Industries/Anvis Group)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2013/C 172/01

On 24 May 2013, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32013M6876. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32013M6876. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.

---
In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

No. 02-19-00284-CR

KIRK ALAN PEARSON, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS

§

§

§

§

§

§

On Appeal from 

County Criminal Court No. 2

of Tarrant County (1522986)

September 03, 2020

Opinion by Justice Gabriel

(nfp)

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that there 

was no reversible error in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment 

of the trial court is affirmed.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS 

By /s/ Lee Gabriel

 Justice Lee Gabriel
#### Ernest Jay TAMERS, Appellant, v. Hon. Wm. R. HEIDTMAN, Sheriff, Palm Beach County, Florida, Appellee.

No. 42925.

Supreme Court of Florida.

June 8, 1973.

Cause dismissed.

CARLTON, C. J., and ADKINS, BOYD, McCAIN and DEKLE, JJ., concur,
#### FEDERAL TITLE AND INSURANCE CORPORATION v. SOLANO.

No. 39382.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Feb. 1970.

Certiorari denied without opinion.
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATIONS

I, Joseph Sinicropi, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Del Laboratories, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal
quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report)
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.

Date: March 29, 2006

                                                     /s/ Joseph Sinicropi
                                                     --------------------
                                                         Joseph Sinicropi
                                                         Chief Financial Officer
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 156 (Monday, August 13, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Page 40113]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-17270]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

[Disaster Declaration #15620 and #15621; MICHIGAN Disaster Number MI-
00066]


Presidential Declaration of a Major Disaster for Public 
Assistance Only for the State of MICHIGAN

AGENCY: U.S. Small Business Administration.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This is a Notice of the Presidential declaration of a major 
disaster for Public Assistance Only for the State of Michigan (FEMA-
4381-DR), dated 08/02/2018.
    Incident: Severe Storms, Flooding, Landslides, and Mudslides.
    Incident Period: 06/16/2018 through 06/18/2018.

DATES: Issued on 08/02/2018.
    Physical Loan Application Deadline Date: 10/01/2018.
    Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date: 05/02/2019.

ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business 
Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport 
Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A Escobar, Office of Disaster 
Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street SW, 
Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416, (202) 205-6734.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that as a result of 
the President's major disaster declaration on 08/02/2018, Private Non-
Profit organizations that provide essential services of a governmental 
nature may file disaster loan applications at the address listed above 
or other locally announced locations.
    The following areas have been determined to be adversely affected 
by the disaster:

Primary Counties: Gogebic, Houghton, Menominee.
    The Interest Rates are:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                Percent
------------------------------------------------------------------------
For Physical Damage:
  Non-Profit Organizations With Credit Available Elsewhere..       2.500
  Non-Profit Organizations Without Credit Available                2.500
   Elsewhere................................................
For Economic Injury:
  Non-Profit Organizations Without Credit Available                2.500
   Elsewhere................................................
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The number assigned to this disaster for physical damage is 15620B 
and for economic injury is 156210.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number 59008)

Rafaela Monchek,
Acting Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance.
[FR Doc. 2018-17270 Filed 8-10-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
# 323