alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Alexander G. HARRIS, Appellant, v. AETNA INSURANCE COMPANY, a Connecticut corporation, and Continental Casualty Company, an Illinois corporation, Appellees.

No. 67-392.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Third District.

March 12, 1968.

Rehearing Denied April 10, 1968.

Lane, French, Primm, Lane & Carrier, Miami, for appellant.

Dixon, Dejarnette, Bradford, Williams, McKay & Kimbrell and James A. Dixon, Jr., Knight, Underwood, Peters, Hoeveler & Pickle, Miami, for appellees.

Before CHARLES CARROLL, C. J., and PEARSON and SWANN, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

The appellant was the plaintiff in a declaratory decree action in which he sought to establish that his policies of insurance with the defendant-appellee were in effect on a day certain. The basis for the claimed coverage on the day designated was an alleged notification by telephone. The trial court found as a matter of fact that the phone call was not made. This finding is supported by evidence in the record. The judgment is therefore affirmed upon authority of Board of County Com’rs of Highlands County v. F. A. Sebring Realty Co., Fla.1953, 63 So.2d 256; Highland Lakes, Inc. v. Art Present Real Estate, Inc., Fla.App.1962, 147 So.2d 348, 349.

Affirmed.
EXHIBIT 32.1

                           SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION

         In connection with the quarterly report of BCS Solutions (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended October 31, 2010 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Tyler Vorhies, President
of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. SS. 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.

November 8, 2010                        /s/ Tyler Vorhies
                                        -----------------
                                        Tyler Vorhies, President, Principal
                                        Executive Officer, Principal Financial
                                        and Accounting officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
# Court of Appeals

First District of Texas

BILL OF COSTS

No. 01

- 15

- 00907

- CV

John Freeman Junior

v

.

Formosa Management, L.L.C.

NO. 2013

- 76492 IN THE 234TH DISTRICT COUR T OF HARRIS C OUNTY

TYPE OF FEE CHARGES PAID/DUE STATUS PAID BY

MT FEE

MT FEE

MT FEE

MT FEE

MT FEE

MT FEE

CLK RECORD

FILING $15.00

$10.00

$10.00

$10.00

$10.00

$10.00

$545.00

$205.00 01/02/2017

11/22/2016

05/02/2016

04/03/2016

02/16/2016

01/21/2016

01/04/2016

10/27/2015 INDIGENT

INDIGENT

E

- PAID

INDIGENT

INDIGENT

INDIGENT

INDIGENT

INDIGEN T ANT

ANT

APE

ANT

ANT

ANT

ANT

ANT



### The costs incurred on appeal to the First Court of Appeals Houston, Texas are $815.00.

Court costs in this case have been taxed in this Court’s judgmentI, Christopher A. Prine

, Clerk o f the Court of Appeals for the Fi rst District of Texas, do hereby

certify that this is a true statement of the costs of appeal in this case.

IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, witness my

hand and the seal of the Court of Appeals for the First District of Texas, this 25 th day of May, 2018

.
# C_2012167EN.01001601.xml

| 13.6.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 167/16 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.6.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 167/16

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

12 June 2012

2012/C 167/05

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,2492 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 99,40 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4324 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,80385 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 8,8640 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,2012 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 7,5465 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 25,682 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 296,92 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,6969 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,3283 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,4630 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,2860 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,2601 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,2852 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 9,6923 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,6097 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,6046 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 461,71 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 10,5284 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,9594 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,5565 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 11 770,30 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 3,9731 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 53,521 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 41,0800 |
| THB | Thai baht | 39,562 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 2,5654 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 17,5712 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 69,7120 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,2492

JPY

Japanese yen

99,40

DKK

Danish krone

7,4324

GBP

Pound sterling

0,80385

SEK

Swedish krona

8,8640

CHF

Swiss franc

1,2012

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

7,5465

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

25,682

HUF

Hungarian forint

296,92

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,6969

PLN

Polish zloty

4,3283

RON

Romanian leu

4,4630

TRY

Turkish lira

2,2860

AUD

Australian dollar

1,2601

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,2852

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

9,6923

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,6097

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,6046

KRW

South Korean won

1 461,71

ZAR

South African rand

10,5284

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,9594

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,5565

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

11 770,30

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

3,9731

PHP

Philippine peso

53,521

RUB

Russian rouble

41,0800

THB

Thai baht

39,562

BRL

Brazilian real

2,5654

MXN

Mexican peso

17,5712

INR

Indian rupee

69,7120

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
# C_2013382EN.01000201.xml

| 31.12.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 382/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

31.12.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 382/2

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

30 December 2013

2013/C 382/03

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,3783 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 145,02 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4603 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,83640 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 8,9283 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,2259 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,4255 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 27,480 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 296,80 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,7025 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,1487 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,4707 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,9348 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,5520 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4764 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 10,6886 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,6866 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,7481 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 454,26 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 14,4257 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 8,3555 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,6250 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 16 839,12 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,5408 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 61,211 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 45,1700 |
| THB | Thai baht | 45,230 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 3,2208 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 18,0096 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 85,3040 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,3783

JPY

Japanese yen

145,02

DKK

Danish krone

7,4603

GBP

Pound sterling

0,83640

SEK

Swedish krona

8,9283

CHF

Swiss franc

1,2259

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,4255

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

27,480

HUF

Hungarian forint

296,80

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,7025

PLN

Polish zloty

4,1487

RON

Romanian leu

4,4707

TRY

Turkish lira

2,9348

AUD

Australian dollar

1,5520

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4764

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

10,6886

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,6866

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,7481

KRW

South Korean won

1 454,26

ZAR

South African rand

14,4257

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

8,3555

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,6250

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

16 839,12

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,5408

PHP

Philippine peso

61,211

RUB

Russian rouble

45,1700

THB

Thai baht

45,230

BRL

Brazilian real

3,2208

MXN

Mexican peso

18,0096

INR

Indian rupee

85,3040

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
II 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1887 

To clarify terms of cooperation between the Consumer Product Safety Commission and foreign government agencies in order to improve safety 

of imported products, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

DECEMBER 20, 2013 

Mrs. MCCASKILL introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation 

A BILL 

To clarify terms of cooperation between the Consumer Product Safety Commission and foreign government agencies 

in order to improve safety of imported products, and 

for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. AUTHORIZATION FOR FOREIGN GOVERNMENTS 

4 TO SHARE INFORMATION OBTAINED FROM 

5 THE CONSUMER PRODUCT SAFETY COMMIS6 SION. 

7 Section 29(f) of the Consumer Product Safety Act 

8 (15 U.S.C. 2078(f)) is amended— 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 1887 IS

1 (1) by redesignating paragraphs (2) through 

2 (5) as paragraphs (3) through (6), respectively; 

3 (2) by inserting after paragraph (1) the fol4 lowing: 

5 ‘‘(2) ADDITIONAL PROVISIONS FOR FOREIGN

6 GOVERNMENT AGENCIES.— 

7 ‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—The Commission may 

8 authorize a foreign government agency that ob9 tains information from the Commission under 

10 paragraph (1) to make that information avail11 able to another foreign government agency of 

12 the same foreign government, including a polit13 ical subdivision of that foreign government that 

14 is located within the same territory or adminis15 trative area as the foreign government agency 

16 disclosing the information, if an appropriate of17 ficial of the foreign government agency dis18 closing the information certifies, by prior agree19 ment, memorandum of understanding with the 

20 Commission, or other written certification, that 

21 the foreign government agency will establish 

22 and apply confidentiality restrictions that con23 form with the restrictions under paragraph (1). 

24 ‘‘(B) CONSTRUCTION.—Nothing in this 

25 paragraph shall be construed to prohibit a forVerDate Mar 15 2010 00:39 Dec 27, 2013 Jkt 039200 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\S1887.IS S1887

jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 1887 IS

1 eign government agency that obtains informa2 tion from the Commission under paragraph (1) 

3 from disclosing that information to a legislative 

4 or judicial authority with jurisdiction over that 

5 foreign government agency.’’; and 

6 (3) by amending paragraph (4), as redesig7 nated, by striking ‘‘paragraph (4)’’ and inserting 

8 ‘‘paragraph (5)’’. 

Æ 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
<PAGE>


                                  EXHIBIT 23.2
               CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

NHancement Technologies Inc.
Pleasanton, California

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Prospectus
constituting a part of Amendment No. 2 to this Registration Statement of our
report dated December 14, 1999, relating to the consolidated financial
statements of NHancement Technologies Inc. appearing in the Company's Annual
Report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended September 30, 1999.

We also consent to the reference to us under the caption "Experts" in the
Prospectus.

/s/ BDO SEIDMAN, LLP

BDO SEIDMAN, LLP
San Francisco, California
August 17, 2000
**EXHIBIT 31.1**
**CERTIFICATION**
I, Gregg L. Engles, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Dean Holding Company; 2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material factnecessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances underwhich such statements were made, not misleading with respectto the period covered by this annual report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this annual report, fairly present in allmaterial respects the financial condition, results of operations and cashflows of Dean Holding Company as of, and for, the periodspresented in this quarterly report; 4. Dean Holding Company’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures(as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for DeanHolding Company and have:
 a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to DeanHolding Company and its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known tous by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this quarterly report is being prepared;  b. Evaluated the effectiveness of Dean Holding Company’s disclosurecontrols and procedures and presented in this annual report ourconclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures as of the period covered by this annual report, based onsuch evaluation; and  c. Disclosed in this annual report any change in Dean HoldingCompany’s internal control over financial reporting that occurredduring Dean Holding Company’s most recent fiscal quarter that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect,Dean Holding Company’s internal control over financial reporting.
5. Dean Holding Company’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, basedon our most recent evaluation of internal control overfinancial reporting, to Dean Holding Company’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the registrant’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions):
 a. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which arereasonably likely to adversely affect Dean Holding Company’s abilityto record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
 b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in Dean Holding Company’sinternal control over financial reporting.
 /s/ GREGG L. ENGLES      Gregg L. Engles *Chief Executive Officer*
March 17, 2005
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED
JUNE 30, 2000 EXTRACTED FROM THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF INCOME AND
COMPREHENSIVE INCOME, CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET, CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS AND THE NOTES THERETO AND IS QUALIFIED IN
ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                           5,129
<SECURITIES>                                    35,930
<RECEIVABLES>                                  153,657
<ALLOWANCES>                                  (11,734)
<INVENTORY>                                     93,856
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               304,194
<PP&E>                                         213,149
<DEPRECIATION>                                (94,767)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 500,821
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          100,240
<BONDS>                                            549
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       179,134
<OTHER-SE>                                     153,867
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   500,821
<SALES>                                        414,677
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               414,677
<CGS>                                          230,033
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  385,369
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               (2,531)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 2,456
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             (1,725)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 31,839
<INCOME-TAX>                                    12,810
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             19,239
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    19,239
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .72
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .72


</TABLE>
# C_2013165EN.01000302.xml

| 11.6.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 165/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.6.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 165/3

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.6854 — Cameron/Schlumberger/Onesubsea)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2013/C 165/05

On 15 April 2013, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32013M6854. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32013M6854. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.

---
IIA

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 3197

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

NOVEMBER 9 (legislative day, NOVEMBER 2), 1993

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Governmental Affairs

AN ACT

To redesignate the postal facility located at 2100 North

13th Street in Reading, Pennsylvania, as the ‘‘Gus Yatron Postal Facility’’.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. REDESIGNATION.

4 The postal facility located at 2100 North 13th Street

5 in Reading, Pennsylvania, and known as the Reading Gen6 eral Mail Facility, shall be known and designated as the

7 ‘‘Gus Yatron Postal Facility’’.
2

•HR 3197 RFS

1 SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

2 Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document,

3 paper, or other record of the United States to the postal

4 facility referred to in section 1 shall be deemed to be a

5 reference to the Gus Yatron Postal Facility.

Passed the House of Representatives November 8,

1993.

Attest: DONNALD K. ANDERSON,

Clerk.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Commerce

###### Foreign-Trade Zones Board

          - [B-26-2018]

On April 11, 2018, AFL Telecommunications, LLC submitted a notification of proposed production activity to the FTZ Board for its facility within FTZ 38, in Duncan, South Carolina.

                    The notification was processed in accordance with the regulations of the FTZ Board (15 CFR part 400), including notice in the                     **Federal Register**                     inviting public comment (83 FR 17790, April 24, 2018). On August 9, 2018, the applicant was notified of the FTZ Board's decision that no further review of the activity is warranted at this time. The production activity described in the notification was authorized, subject to the FTZ Act and the FTZ Board's regulations, including Section 400.14, and to a restriction requiring privileged foreign status (19 CFR 146.41) on admissions of aramid yarn, ripcord, binder string and water swellable yarn.                

Dated: August 9, 2018.

Elizabeth Whiteman,

Acting Executive Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2018-17561 Filed 8-14-18; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v.

GUILLERMO VALLEJO

- MORENO,

Defendant

- Appellant. No. 18

- 501 00

D.C. No. 3:14

- cr

- 01252

- W

MEMORANDUM *

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of California

Thomas J. Whelan, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted October 22, 2018 **

Before: SILVERMAN, GRABER, and GOULD, Circuit Judges.

Guillermo Vallejo

- Moreno appeals from the sentence of twelve months and

one day imposed upon revocation of supervised release. Pursuant to Anders v.

California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Vallejo

- Moreno’s counsel has filed a brief stating

that there are no grounds for relief, along with a moti on to withdraw as counsel of

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 

# FILED

OCT 29 2018

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEAL S2 18

- 50100

record. We have provided Vallejo

- Moreno the opportunity to file a pro se

supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been

filed.

Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio , 488 U.S.

75, 80 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal.

Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED.

AFFIRMED.