alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 20.1



                        TANNER'S RESTAURANT GROUP, INC.:

                             NOTICE OF ACTION TAKEN
                                       BY
                               THE WRITTEN CONSENT
                                OF THE HOLDERS OF
              A MAJORITY OF THE OUTSTANDING SHARES OF COMMON STOCK


     Pursuant to Section 9.10(A)(4) of the Texas Business Corporation Act,
notice is hereby given of the following action taken by the written consent (the
"Written Consent") of the holders of a majority of the outstanding shares of
common stock of Tanner's Restaurant Group, Inc. (the "Company"):

     On May 11, 2000, the holders of a majority of the outstanding shares the
common stock of the Company elected the following persons to the Board of
Directors of the Company:

                                 Jose A. Auffant
                                 Rollin M. Shouse

     Pursuant to the terms of the Written Consent, all members serving on the
Board of Directors on the date immediately preceding the date of the Written
Consent were removed, and Messrs. Auffant and Shouse became the only members of
the Board of Directors.

     This Notice of Action Taken by the Written Consent of the Holders of a
Majority of the Outstanding Shares of Common Stock has been executed as of this
1st day of June, 2000.

                                                Tanner's Restaurant Group, Inc.


                                                By: /s/ Jose A. Auffant
                                                -----------------------
                                                Name: Jose A. Auffant
                                                Title: Chief Executive Officer
# C_2014072EN.01000201.xml

| 11.3.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 72/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.3.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 72/2

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.7156 — WEX/Radius/European Fuel Card Business of Esso)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2014/C 72/02

On 5 March 2014, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32014M7156. EUR-Lex is the online access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32014M7156. EUR-Lex is the online access to the European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
# C_2013140EN.01000601.xml

| 18.5.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 140/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.5.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 140/6

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

17 May 2013

2013/C 140/02

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,2869 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 131,87 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4524 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,84475 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 8,5922 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,2449 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 7,5393 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 25,989 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 290,56 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,6993 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,1704 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,3370 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,3646 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,3216 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,3220 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 9,9911 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,5917 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,6156 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 437,84 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 12,0764 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,9040 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,5710 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 12 554,93 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 3,8890 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 52,964 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 40,3876 |
| THB | Thai baht | 38,324 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 2,6100 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 15,8403 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 70,6060 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,2869

JPY

Japanese yen

131,87

DKK

Danish krone

7,4524

GBP

Pound sterling

0,84475

SEK

Swedish krona

8,5922

CHF

Swiss franc

1,2449

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

7,5393

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

25,989

HUF

Hungarian forint

290,56

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,6993

PLN

Polish zloty

4,1704

RON

Romanian leu

4,3370

TRY

Turkish lira

2,3646

AUD

Australian dollar

1,3216

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,3220

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

9,9911

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,5917

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,6156

KRW

South Korean won

1 437,84

ZAR

South African rand

12,0764

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,9040

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,5710

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

12 554,93

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

3,8890

PHP

Philippine peso

52,964

RUB

Russian rouble

40,3876

THB

Thai baht

38,324

BRL

Brazilian real

2,6100

MXN

Mexican peso

15,8403

INR

Indian rupee

70,6060

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
Exhibit 4.268




---



##### 



1




---



##### 



2




---



##### 



3




---



##### 



4




---



##### 



5




---



##### 



6




---



##### 



7




---



##### 



8




---



##### 



9




---



##### 



10




---



##### 



THE DETROIT EDISON COMPANYBy:
    /s/ Edward SolomonName:
    Edward SolomonTitle:
    Assistant Treasurer  By:
    /s/ Sandra Kay EnnisName:
    Sandra Kay EnnisTitle:
    Corporate Secretary 11




---



##### 



THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON TRUST
COMPANY, N.A., as TrusteeBy:
    /s/ Alexis M. JohnsonName:
    Alexis M. JohnsonTitle:
    Authorized Officer  By:
    /s/ J. Michael BanasName:
    J. Michael BanasTitle:
    Vice President 12




---



##### 



EXHIBIT A
 No. R-___
    
    $
   
       
 A-1




---



##### 



A-2




---



##### 



A-3




---



##### 



A-4




---



##### 



A-5




---



##### 



A-6




---



##### 



THE DETROIT EDISON COMPANY[Corporate Seal]By:Name:Title: ATTEST:By:Name:Title: A-7




---



##### 



THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON TRUST COMPANY, N.A.
as TrusteeBy:Authorized Signatory 
 A-8




---



##### 



A-9
#### Susan BARNETT and Mrs. K. L. Barnett, Sr. v. Lawrence M. MILLS.

No. 45973.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

Sept. 21, 1970.

Walker & Sullivan, Laurel & Waynes-boro, for appellants.

William Vol Jones, Jr., W. Vol Jones, Waynesboro, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
Exhibit 32


                         CERTIFICATION UNDER SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


Pursuant  to  Section  906  of  the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of  2002,  each  of the
undersigned   certifies   that  the  annual  report  fully   complies  with  the
requirements  of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the  Securities  Exchange Act of 1934
and that  information  contained  in this amended  annual  report on Form 10-K/A
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of
operations of The Deltona Corporation.


/S/ Antony Gram
---------------
Antony Gram
Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer
August 13, 2003



/S/ Robert O. Moore
-------------------
Robert O. Moore
Chief Financial Officer
August 13, 2003


     A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has
been  provided  to The Deltona  Corporation  and will be retained by The Deltona
Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
upon request.

     The foregoing certification  accompanies the issuer's amended annual report
on Form 10-K/A and is not filed as provided in SEC Release Nos. 33-8212, 34-4751
and IC-25967, dated June 30, 2003.


<PAGE>
#### The STATE of Florida ex rel. Janvier Charles KNIGHT, Relator, v. Louie L. WAINWRIGHT, as Director of the Division of Corrections, State of Florida, Respondent.

No. 71-1102.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Oct. 20, 1971.

PER CURIAM.

Habeas corpus denied.
# C_2013310EN.01000201.xml

| 25.10.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 310/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.10.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 310/2

---

Initiation of proceedings

(Case COMP/M.7009 — Holcim/Cemex West)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2013/C 310/02

On 22 October 2013, the Commission decided to initiate proceedings in the abovementioned case after finding that the notified concentration raises serious doubts as to its compatibility with the internal market. The initiation of proceedings opens a second phase investigation with regard to the notified concentration, and is without prejudice to the final decision on the case. The decision is based on Article 6(1)(c) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004.

The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their observations on the proposed concentration to the Commission.

In order to be fully taken into account in the procedure, observations should reach the Commission not later than 15 days following the date of this publication. Observations can be sent to the Commission by fax (+32 22964301 / 22967244) or by post, under reference COMP/M.7009 — Holcim/Cemex West, to the following address:

| European Commission |
| --- |
| Directorate-General for Competition |
| Merger Registry |
| 1049 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |

European Commission

Directorate-General for Competition

Merger Registry

1049 Bruxelles/Brussel

BELGIQUE/BELGIË

---
#### STATE of Florida ex rel. Cornelious HEARD, Relator, v. Honorable Alfonso C. SEPE, in his official capacity as Judge of the Criminal Court of Record in and for Dade County, Florida, Respondent.

No. 71-156.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Feb. 12, 1971.

PER CURIAM.

Prohibition dismissed.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 05-7330

CHARLES R. LABOONE, Petitioner - Appellant,
versus RONALD J. ANGELONE, Director, Virginia Department of Corrections, Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Henry Coke Morgan, Jr., Senior District Judge. (CA-96-746-2) Submitted: November 17, 2005 Decided: November 29, 2005 Before WILKINSON, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Charles R. LaBoone, Appellant Pro Se. Linwood Theodore Wells, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: Charles R. LaBoone seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his motion filed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b). The district court found that LaBoone’s motion actually sought relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000), and dismissed the action because he failed to first obtain authorization from this court to file a successive § 2254 petition. See 28 U.S.C. § 2244(b) (2000). The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of his constitutional claims is debatable and that any dispositive procedural rulings by the district court are also debatable or wrong. SeeMiller-El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee , 252 F.3d 676, 683 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that LaBoone has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
COMPANY SANITIZED. DOES NOT CONTAIN TSCA CBI2010/15 PFOA Global Stewardship ProgramCompany Report: Summary of Annual Emissions and Product ContentSECTION 1: REPORT DATEOctober 2009SECTION 2: COMPANY IDENTIFICATIONCompany NameArkema Inc.2aStreet Address2000 Market StreetPhiladelphia, PA 19103SECTION 3: SUMMARY OF EMISSIONSReporting Period (use calendar year - e.g. Jan 1, 2000 to Dec 31, 2000)Jan 1, 2008 to Dec 31, 2008Releases to all environmental media fromfluoropolymer and telomer manufactureOperationsChemical categorykgs1mersfluoropolyofkgscategoryofkgstelomersofkgscategoryofkgsPFOA, PFOA salts andhigher homologues> 1,000 – 10,000 > 0.001 – 0.01NA3aU.S. facilitiesPrecursorsNA NANAPFOA, PFOA salts andhigher homologues> 1,000 – 10,000 > 0.001 – 0.01NA3bNon-U.S. facilitiesPrecursorsNA NANAPlease provide information on the methods, assumptions, uncertainties and detection limits for the data provided above.3cFor each chemical category, the quantity of chemical released was determined for each process using mass balances, engineering calculations,and actual measurements of the chemical. The total quantity released is the sum of releases from thedifferent processes. The margin oferror for the total quantity released for all of the chemical categories is approximately +/- 5%.COMPANY SANITIZED. DOES NOT CONTAIN TSCA CBISECTION 4: SUMMARY OF PRODUCT CONTENTReporting Period (use calendar year - e.g. Jan 1, 2000 to Dec 31, 2000)Jan 1, 2008 to Dec 31, 2008Product typeFluoropolymer dispersionsOther fluoropolymers1Telomer based products4aProduction volume (kgs/year)2> 100,000 kgs – 1,000,000 kgsOver 1,000,000 kgsNAConcentration3OperationsChemical categoryFluoropolymer dispersions4(ppm wet-weight)Other fluoropolymers1,5(ppb dry-weight)Telomer based products6(ppb dry-weight)PFOA, PFOA saltsand higherhomologues> 100 ppm – 300 ppm> 50,000 ppb - 100,000 ppbNA4bU.S.facilitiesPrecursorsNA NANAPFOA, PFOA saltsand higherhomologuesNA> 50,000 ppb - 100,000 ppbNA4cNon-U.S.facilitiesPrecursorsNA NANA4dPlease provide information on the methods, assumptions, uncertainties and detection limits for the data provided above.1Fluoropolymers manufactured with PFOA or related chemicals.2Use the following ranges: (1) Zero (2) > 0 – 10kgs; (3) > 10 kgs – 100 kgs; (4) > 100 kgs – 1,000 kgs; (5) > 1,000 kgs – 10,000 kgs; (6) > 10,000kgs –100,000 kgs; (7) > 100,000 kgs – 1,000,000 kgs; (8) Over 1,000,000 kgs.3Concentration should reflect the concentration ofchemical in the product as sold by the reporting company. If the reporting company has informationconcerning the concentration of chemical in the product as used by others – for example, as incorporated by dilution into a formulation – that additionalinformation would also be helpful.4This value should be expressed as a weighted average concentration and range.5This value should be expressed as a maximum concentration.6This value should be expressed as a simple (not weighted) average and range.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

CHRISTOPHER JOHNS,

 Petitioner

 v.

UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION

BOARD OF REVIEW,

 Respondent

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 198 WAL 2014

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the

Order of the Commonwealth Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 19th day of August, 2014, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AS OF JUNE 30, 2000 AND THE CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2000 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                           6,500
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    2,426
<ALLOWANCES>                                      (48)
<INVENTORY>                                          3
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 4,365
<PP&E>                                           2,731
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (2,183)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  10,688
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            7,713
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         4,703
<OTHER-SE>                                     (3,168)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    10,688
<SALES>                                          3,817
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 4,562
<CGS>                                            1,225
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    8,831
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    82
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (4,351)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (591)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (3,760)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (3,760)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.27)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.27)


</TABLE>
crws20160830_10q.htm


Exhibit 10.1

 

 

CROWN CRAFTS, INC.

2014 OMNIBUS EQUITY COMPENSATION PLAN

 

AMENDMENT NO. 1

 

 

This Amendment No. 1 to the 2014 Omnibus Equity Compensation Plan (the “Plan) of CROWN CRAFTS, INC., a Delaware corporation (the “Corporation”), is effective as of August 9, 2016.

 

	 	
1.
	
Section 14.2 of the Plan is hereby amended and restated in its entirety as follows:



 

“14.2     Election to Withhold Shares. If the Committee so permits, shares of Company Stock may be withheld to satisfy the Company’s tax withholding obligation with respect to Grants paid in Company Stock, at the time such Grants become taxable, up to an amount that does not exceed the maximum statutory tax rates in the applicable jurisdictions.”

 

	 	
2.
	
The remaining provisions of the Plan shall remain in full force and effect in accordance with their terms, except as such terms are specifically amended by, or conflict with, this Amendment.



 

* * * * *
#### Francis A. RODRIGUE, Sr. v. B. G. MAYET d/b/a Bonnet Carre Cattle Company, et al.

No. 8967.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Fourth Circuit.

June 13, 1978.

Porteous, Toledano, Hainkel & Johnson, James S. Thompson, New Orleans, for defendant-appellee.

*1325Daniel E. Becnel, Jr. and Barry J. Landry, Reserve, for plaintiff-appellant.

Before REDMANN, GARSAUD and De-SONIER, JJ.

DeSONIER, Judge.

Plaintiff appeals from a judgment dismissing his suit for personal injuries sustained when his automobile killed a cow. Named defendants were the alleged owner of the cow, B. G. Mayet, d/b/a Bonnet Carre Cattle Company, and its liability insurer.

Louisiana’s stock law applicable to U. S. Highway 61, R.S. 3:2803, and the codal article making the owner responsible for damage caused by an animal, C.C. Art. 2321, are interpreted to place on the animal’s owner the burden of proving that he was free of negligence. An owner

> must not only show he has taken all reasonably prudent precautions . . , but must also explain the presence of the livestock on the highway by showing how the animal escaped in order to overcome the presumption of negligence and to prove freedom from fault in the slightest degree. *Womack v. Rhymes,*La.App., 300 So.2d 226, 231, writ refused, La., 303 So.2d 179.

Accordingly, plaintiff need not show negligence on the owner’s part. If he established that defendant is the owner, he recovers.

But plaintiff did not establish defendant’s ownership. The trial judge’s reasoning that there was “no evidence offered to place ownership in the defendant” is supported by the record.

For the reasons assigned, the judgment appealed from is affirmed.

*AFFIRMED.*
U.S. flag
              An official website of the United States government





---

close


back button
 Cameroon source
 Print Share
 Basic Facts Population
 People per sq. km
 Males per 100 females
 Children per woman
 Goods exported from U.S.
 Goods imported to U.S.
 Change in exports from U.S. for 2014 to 2023
 A Closer Look Source
 Comparisons
 Compared to the U.S.
 Compared to the World
 K = Thousands
                M = Millions
                B = Billions
  Merchandise Trade U.S. Trade in Manufactured Goods
 Top Exported Goods by U.S. State or Territory
 Population Current and Projected Population
 Population by Age and Sex
 Source and Notes Source: U.S. Census Bureau, International Database (demographic data) and USA Trade Online (trade data); Central Intelligence Agency, The World Fact Book (country reference maps). This application presents data for 228 countries and areas of the world with a 2024 population of 5,000 or more. For eleven of those countries and areas, only demographic data are presented. "Data not available" indicates that data are not available from this application.  In such instances, data may be available elsewhere at the census.gov website. Trade figures presented for France do not include data for overseas departments French Guiana, Guadeloupe, Martinique, Mayotte, and Reunion but do include data for dependencies Saint Barthelemy and Saint Martin.  Trade figures for the United Kingdom include data for crown dependencies Guernsey, Isle of Man, and Jersey. To learn more about world population projections, go to Notes on the World Population Clock. To learn more about international trade data, go to Guide to Foreign Trade Statistics. All trade figures are in U.S. dollars on a nominal basis.


CONNECT WITH US
 Information Quality
                    Data Linkage Infrastructure
                    Data Protection and Privacy Policy
                    Accessibility      
                    FOIA
                    Inspector General
                    No FEAR Act
                    U.S. Department of Commerce
                    USA.gov
  Measuring America's People, Places, and Economy
#### STATE of Louisiana ex rel. Garnett WATSON v. C. Murray HENDERSON, Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary.

No. 53012.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Jan. 25, 1973.

In re: Garnett Watson applying for remedial writs and writ of habeas corpus.

Writ denied. There is no factual basis for the complaint.