T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pa ne l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l ar g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2).

Th e H o n o r ab l e J a me s G . Carr , Se n i o rD i s tr i c tJu d g e f o rth e U . S. ** * D i s tr i c tC ourtf

orthe N orthe rn D i s tr i c tof O hi o, s i tt i ng byde s i gna t i on. NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T F R AN C I S C O J . MAC E DO C A S T E L L O N , A K A F r a nc e s c o M a c e do, P et i t i on er , v. E R I C H . H O L D E R , J r ., A tto rn e yG e n e r a l, R e s p o n d e n t. N o. 09- 73816 A ge nc yN o. A 075- 769- 946 ME MOR AN DU M *

O n P e t i t i on f

orR e vi e w of

a n O r de rof

the B o a r do f I m m ig r a tio n A p p e a ls S ubm i tt e d F e bruary12, 2013 ** P a s a d e n a , C a lif

o rn ia B ef ore: B E R Z O N and W A T F O R D , C i rc ui tJudg es , and C A R R , S eni or D i stri ct Judg e. *** 

# FI LED APR04 2 013 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS2

P e t i t i one r , F r a nc i s c o J . M a c e do- C a s t e l l on, pe t i t i ons f orr e vi e w of

aB oar d of I m m i gr a t i on A ppe a l s ( B I A ) or de rde ny i ng hi s m ot i on t o r e ope n a s unt i m e l y . T he B I A a l s o c onc l ude d tha tthe ne w e vi de nc e M a c e do- C a s t e l l on s ubm i tt e d di d not w a rr a ntr e ope ni ng i n a nye ve nt . F orthe f ol l ow i ng r e a s ons , w e di s m i s s the pe t i t i on. M a c e do- C a s t e l l on f

i r s ta r gue s tha the s houl d be e nt i t l e d t o e qui t abl e t ol l i ng b e c au s e h is a tto rn e yc o m m itte df r au dw h e n s h e p r o m is e dto f ile h is m o tio n to re op en i n a t i m el y m anner and fai l ed t o d o so. H ow ever , he di d n otprov i de prop er e v id e n c e o f

th e p u rp o rte dm is c o n du c t to th e B I A , n o rh a s h e d o n e s o h e r e . See L opezv . I

. N . S. , 1 8 4 F .3 d1 0 9 7 , 1 1 0 0 ( 9 th C ir . 1 9 9 9 ) . T h u s , th e B I A d idn o t e rrin d en yi n g M aced o -C ast el l o n ’ s m o t i o n as u n t i m el y. E ven i f M ac edo-C as t el l on ’ s m ot i on t o reopen w er e t i m el y, w e w ou l d l ac k ju r is d ic tio n to r e v ie w th e B I A ’s d e n ia l b e c au s e it “p e rta in [ e d ] o n lyto th e m e r its basi s f or a pre vi ou sl y- m ade di sc re t i on ary det erm i nat i on . ” Ferna ndezv. G on zales , 439 F . 3d 592, 603 ( 9th C i r . 2006) . H e r e , the B I A pr e vi ous l yde ni e d M a c e doC as t el l on ’ s app l i cat i on for c ance l l at i on of re m ov albase d o n the di sc re t i on ary det erm i nat i on thathe fa i l ed t o est abl i sh “ exce pt i on aland extre m el y unu sual hardshi p” t o a qu al i fy i ng re l at i ve. 8 U . S . C . § 1 22 9b (b)( 1). M ac edo-C as t el l on fi l ed am o tio n to r e o p e n b a s e do n th e s a m e typ e o f e v id e n c e o n w h ic h h e p r e v io u s ly r e l i e d t o s upporthi s c a nc e l l a t i on of r e m ova l c l a i m , a nd the B I A c onc l ude d tha tthe3

evi dence w as i nsuffi ci entt o w arrantre op eni ng hi s c as e. U nd er Ferna ndez , we w o u ldlack ju risd icti o n to re v iew th is d eterm in atio n b ec au se M ac ed o -C as tell o n ’s pet i t i on pres ent s “ es se nt i al l y the sam e di sc re t i on ary i ss ue ori gi nal l y dec i ded. ” Ferna ndez , 439 F . 3d a t600. I n a n ye v e n t, th e B I A ’s d e n ia l o f M a c e d o - C a s te llo n ’s m o tio n to r e o p e n d id notr e s ul ti n avi ol a t i on of due pr oc e s s . A due pr oc e s s vi ol a t i on m ayr e s ul tf r om the B IA ’ s f ai l ure t o revi ew approp ri at el y a l l of the evi dence provi ded t o i t . H ow ever , it is “p r e s u m e d ” th a t th e B I A “r e v ie w [ e d ] a ll th e e v id e n c e p r e s e n te du n le s s [ it] expl i ci t l y e xp re ss es otherw i se . ” L ar i ta-M ar t i nezv . I

. N . S. , 220 F . 3d 1092, 1095 (9 th C i r. 2 0 0 0 ) (i n t ern al q u o t at i o n m ark s o m i tt ed ). M o reo v er, b ecau se M a c e d o - C a s te llo n ’s w if e is n e ith e raU .S . c itiz e n n o ralaw f u l p e rm an e n t r e s id e n t, the B oard w as no tob l i ged t o g i ve w ei gh tt o the evi dence re gardi ng her m edi ca l c ondi t i on. M a c e do- C a s t e l l on ha s the r e f or e f a i l e d t o pr ovi de i nf

orm a t i on s uf

f i c i e nt t o de m ons tr a t e adue pr oc e s s vi ol a t i on. P E T I T I ON F OR RE V I E W DI S MI S S E D.