alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                           WINTHROP & WEINSTINE, P.A.
                            3000 Dain Rauscher Plaza
                              60 South Sixth Street
                          Minneapolis, Minnesota 55402
                                 (612) 347-0700



                               September 13, 2000

                                                                     Exhibit 5.1

Securities and Exchange Commission
450 - 5th Street NW
Washington, D.C.  20549

Re:      Vicom, Incorporated - Registration Statement on Form S-1 for Offering
         of Subordinated Debentures

Gentlemen:

We have acted as legal counsel for Vicom, Incorporated, a Minnesota corporation
(the "Company"), in connection with the preparation of a Registration Statement
on Form S-1, as amended (the "Registration Statement"), filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC"), File No. 333-44734, and the
Prospectus to be used in conjunction with the Registration Statement (the
"Prospectus"), relating to the registration under the Securities Act of 1933, as
amended, of the offer and sale by the Company of up to $50 million in
subordinated debentures (the "Debentures") to be sold in the manner set forth in
the Registration Statement. The Debentures are being offered under an Indenture
(the "Indenture") to be entered into by and between the Company and Firstar Bank
Minnesota, National Association, as trustee thereunder (the "Trustee").

In connection therewith, we have examined (a) the Articles of Incorporation and
Bylaws of the Company, both as amended to date; (b) the corporate proceedings of
the Company relative to its organization and to the authorization and issuance
of the Debenture; (c) the Registration Statement and the Prospectus; and (d) the
form of Indenture filed as an exhibit to the Registration Statement. In addition
to such examination, we have reviewed such other proceedings, certificates,
documents and records and have ascertained or verified such additional facts as
we deem necessary or appropriate for purposes of this opinion.

Based upon the foregoing, we are of the opinion that:

<PAGE>

Vicom, Incorporated
September 13, 2000
Page 2


1.   The Company has been legally incorporated and is validly existing under the
     laws of the State of Minnesota.

2.   All necessary corporate action has been taken by the Company to authorize
     the offer and sale of the Debentures.

3.   Upon the sale of the Debentures as described in the Registration Statement
     and the execution of the Indenture by the Company and the Trustee, the
     Debentures will be legally issued, fully paid and nonassessable and will be
     binding obligations of the Company in accordance with their terms and the
     terms of the Indenture.

We hereby consent to the filing of this opinion as an exhibit to the
Registration Statement and to the reference to our firm under the "Legal
Matters" section in the Prospectus.

Very truly yours,

WINTHROP & WEINSTINE, P.A.


By -     /s/ Michele D. Vaillancourt
         Michele D. Vaillancourt
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 3049

To extend the current interim exemption under the Marine Mammal

Protection Act for commercial fisheries until April 1, 1994.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

SEPTEMBER 13, 1993

Mr. STUDDS (for himself, Mr. YOUNG of Alaska, and Mr. SAXTON) introduced

the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Merchant Marine and Fisheries

A BILL

To extend the current interim exemption under the Marine

Mammal Protection Act for commercial fisheries until

April 1, 1994.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That section 114(a)(1) of the Marine Mammal Protection

4 Act of 1972 (16 U.S.C. 1383a(a)(1)), is amended by strik5 ing ‘‘October 1, 1993,’’ and inserting in lieu thereof ‘‘April

6 1, 1994,’’.

Æ
#### John STEWART, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 70-967.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Jan. 28, 1971.

Appeal from Criminal Court of Record, Orange County; W. Rogers Turner, Judge.

Appeal dismissed.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 17-6419

DAVID MICHAEL BOMBER,

Petitioner - Appellant,

v.

HAROLD CLARKE, Director, Dept. of Corrections,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at 

Roanoke. Elizabeth Kay Dillon, District Judge. (7:16-cv-00171-EKD-RSB)

Submitted: July 27, 2017 Decided: August 1, 2017

Before AGEE and FLOYD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

David Michael Bomber, Appellant Pro Se. Victoria Lee Johnson, OFFICE OF THE 

ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

David Michael Bomber seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on 

his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2012) petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice 

or judge issues a certificate of appealability. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(A) (2012). A 

certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a 

constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012). When the district court denies 

relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable 

jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is 

debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller-El v. 

Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on 

procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural 

ruling is debatable, and that the petition states a debatable claim of the denial of a 

constitutional right. Slack, 529 U.S. at 484-85. 

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Bomber has not 

made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny Bomber’s motion for a certificate of 

appealability, deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis, and dismiss the appeal. We 

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately 

presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional 

process. 

DISMISSED
#### Dale Edward JONES, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Nos. 69-714, 69-715.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Aug. 19, 1970.

Jim D. Syprett of Crabtree, Butler, Brush, Syprett & Meshad, Sarasota, for appellant.

Earl Faircloth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Michael N. Kavouklis, Asst. Atty. Gen., Lakeland, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

We have examined the record, the briefs and all other papers filed in this matter and no reversible error having been shown, the judgment appealed from is therefore affirmed.

LILES, Acting C. J., and PIERCE, J., concur.

McNULTY, J., dissents with opinion.

McNULTY, Judge

(dissenting).

The one meritorious point on appeal is whether an unloaded pistol, not used as a bludgeon, constitutes a “deadly weapon” so as to support a conviction of aggravated assault. Our sister court in the First District concluded in the affirmative, Bass v. State, (1970), 232 So.2d 25. I disagree. The element of placing the victim in fear of imminent peril is embodied in the assault itself; but it’s the control of a “deadly weapon” by the perpetrator which raises the assault to the higher degree of crime, the gravamen of which is the present ability to inflict death or great bodily harm. Solitro v. State (Fla.App.2d 1964), 165 So.2d 223. This is hardly possible with an unloaded gun not used as a bludgeon. See, 79 A.L.R.2d 1424.
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 156 (Monday, August 13, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Page 39987]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-17308]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

RIN 0648-XG412


Mid-Atlantic Fishery Management Council (MAFMC); Public Meetings

AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and 
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.

ACTION: Notice; public meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Mid-Atlantic Fishery Management Council's (Council) Spiny 
Dogfish Advisory Panel (AP) will meet to review recent fishery 
performance and develop a Fishery Performance Report and/or other 
recommendations in preparation for development of annual specifications 
commencing May 1, 2019. Specifications can be set for up to five years.

DATES: The meeting will be held Monday, August 27, 2018, from 4:30 p.m. 
to 7 p.m.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held via webinar, but anyone can also 
attend at the Council office address (see below). The webinar link is: 
http://mafmc.adobeconnect.com/dogfishap2018/. Please call the Council 
at least 24 hours in advance if you wish to attend at the Council 
office.
    Council address: Mid-Atlantic Fishery Management Council, 800 N. 
State St., Suite 201, Dover, DE 19901; telephone: (302) 674-2331.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Christopher M. Moore, Ph.D. Executive 
Director, Mid-Atlantic Fishery Management Council; telephone: (302) 
526-5255. The Council's website, www.mafmc.org also has details on the 
proposed agenda, webinar access, and briefing materials.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The purpose of the meeting is to create a 
Fishery Performance Report by the Council's Spiny Dogfish Advisory 
Panel. The intent of the report is to facilitate structured input from 
the Advisory Panel members into the specifications development process.

Special Accommodations

    The meeting is physically accessible to people with disabilities. 
Requests for sign language interpretation or other auxiliary aid should 
be directed to M. Jan Saunders, (302) 526-5251, at least 5 days prior 
to the meeting date.

    Dated: August 8, 2018.
Tracey L. Thompson,
Acting Deputy Director, Office of Sustainable Fisheries, National 
Marine Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 2018-17308 Filed 8-10-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 3510-22-P
# C O G I S

­ P r o d u c t i o n D a t a I n q u i r y

P r o d u c t i o n r e p o r t s w i l l b e l i s t e d b y y e a r a n d w i l l s h o w m o n t h l y p r o d u c t i o n w i t h i n t h e y e a r s e l e c t e d

.

D a t a c a n b e r

e q u e s t e d b y W e l l

, F a c i l i t y / L e a s e

, O p e r a t o r

, C o u n t y

, o r F i e l d

.

D i s p l a y P r o d u c t i o n D a t a a c c o r d i n g t o :

W e l l O p e r

a t o r C o u n t y F i e l d

W a r n i n g : G r o u p i n g b y w e l l o r f a c i l i t y / l e a s e

, w i t h o u t e n t e r i n g s e a r c h c r i t e r i a b e l o w

, w i l l r e t u r n a l a r g e n u m b e r o f r e c o r d s

. C o n s i d e r u s i n g t h e " L i m i t

R e c o r d s " s e l e c

t i o n u n t i l y o u a r e s u r e y o u h a v e t h e c o r r e c t s e a r c h c r i t e r i a f

o r y o u n e e d s

.

E n t e r s e a r c h c r i t e r i a :



### Y e a r R a n g e 2 0 1 5 

### t o 2 0 1 5



### C o u n t y

S e l e c t c o u n t y h e r

e

i f y o u a r e N O T u s i n g

A P I c o d e s

. 

### A D A M S

A L A M O S A

A R A P A H O E

A R C H U L E T A

B A C A

B E N T

B O U L D E R

B R O O M F I E L D

C H A F F E E

C H E Y E N N E

C L E A R C R E E K

C O N E J O S

C O S T I L L A

C R O W L E Y

C U S T E R

D E L T A

D E N V E R

D O L O R E S Y o u m a y s e l e c t m u l t i p l e c o u n t i e s b y h o l d i n g d o w n t h e C t r l k e y w h i l e c l i c k i n g

. 

### W e l l A P I C o u n t y C o d e : S e q u e n c e C o d e : W e l l B o r e C o d e :



### O p e r a t o r N a m e N u m b e r

F a c i l i t y / L e a s e N a m e N u m b e r

F i e l d N a m e N u m b e r

L o c a t i o n : Q t r q t r S e c T w p R a n g e

L i m i t R e c o r d s 1 0 R e c o r d s C a u t i o n : C O G I S c o n t a i n s t e n s o f t h o u s a n d s o f r e c o r d s !



### S u b m i t R e s e t

N o t e : B e g i n n i n g J a n u a r

y 1 s t

, 1 9 9 9 o i l

, g a s a n d w a t e r p r o d u c t i o n h a s t o b e s u b m i t t e d t o t h e C o m m i s s i o n b y w e l l

. P r i o r t o
# **Exhibit 15**

 

**LETTER OF AWARENESS FROM DELOITTE& TOUCHE LLP**

 

To the Board of Directors and

Shareholders of InvestorsFinancial Services Corp:

 

We have made a review, inaccordance with standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board(United States), of the unaudited interim financial information of InvestorsFinancial Services Corp. and subsidiaries for the periods ended September 30,2005 and 2004, as indicated in our report dated November 2, 2005; because wedid not perform an audit, we expressed no opinion on that information.

 

We are aware that our reportreferred to above, which is included in your Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q forthe quarter ended September 30, 2005, is incorporated by reference in thefollowing Registration Statements:

 

Filed on Form S-8:

Registration Statement No.333-72786

Registration Statement No.333-79639

Registration Statement No.333-43353

 

We also are aware that theaforementioned report, pursuant to Rule 436(c) under the Securities Act of1933, is not considered a part of the Registration Statements prepared orcertified by an accountant or a report prepared or certified by an accountantwithin the meaning of Sections 7 and 11 of that Act.

 

 
|  /s/DELOITTE  & TOUCHE LLP |   |
|-------------------------------------|--------|
| Boston,  Massachusetts              |
| November  2, 2005                   |

 

----
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 156 (Monday, August 13, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Page 40089]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-17230]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION


Proposal Review Panel for Computing and Communication 
Foundations; Notice of Meeting

    In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-
463, as amended), the National Science Foundation (NSF) announces the 
following meeting:

    Name and Committee Code: Proposal Review Panel for Computing and 
Communication Foundations (#1192)--Expeditions in Computing 
Division--Year 2 DeepSpec Site Visit
    Date and Time: September 5, 2018; 7:00 p.m.-9:00 p.m.
    September 6, 2018; 8:00 a.m.-9:00 p.m.
    September 7, 2018; 8:30 a.m.-3:30 p.m.
    Place: BU George Sherman Union, Metcalf Hall, 775 Commonwealth 
Ave. Boston, MA 02215.
    Type of Meeting: Part-Open.
    Contact Person: Mitra Basu, Expeditions in Computing Program, 
National Science Foundation, 2415 Eisenhower Avenue, Alexandria, 
Virginia 22314; Telephone 703/292-8910.
    Purpose of Meeting: Site visit to assess the progress of the EIC 
Award: CCF-1522074, ``Collaborative Research: Evolvable Living 
Computing--Understanding and Quantifying Synthetic Biological 
Systems' Applicability, Performance, and Limits,'' and to provide 
advice and recommendations concerning further NSF support for the 
project.

Agenda

Wednesday, September 5, 2018

    7:00 p.m.-9:00 p.m.: Closed--Evening briefing to discuss the 
Expeditions award and forthcoming site visit.

Thursday, September 6, 2018

    8:00 a.m.-12:30 p.m.: Open--Presentations by Awardee 
Institution, faculty staff and students, to Site Team and NSF Staff. 
Discussions and question and answer sessions.
    1:30 p.m.-2:00 p.m.: Closed--NSF Staff and Panelists 
deliberation.
    2:00 p.m.- 5:00 p.m.: Open--Continued presentations by Awardee 
Institution. Response and feedback to presentations by Site Team and 
NSF Staff. Discussions and question and answer sessions. Draft 
report on education and research activities. Complete written site 
visit report with preliminary recommendations.
    6:00 p.m.-9:00 p.m.: Closed--NSF Staff and Panelists working 
dinner.

Friday, September 7, 2018

    8:30 a.m.-10:00 a.m.: Open--Expeditions PIs responses to issues 
raised by panelists.
    10:30 a.m.-2:30 p.m.: Closed--Panelists prepare site visit 
report.
    2:30 p.m.-3:30 p.m.: Open--Presentation of site visit report to 
Expeditions leadership team.

    Reason for Closing: Topics to be discussed and evaluated during 
closed portions of the site review will include information of a 
proprietary or confidential nature, including technical information; 
and information on personnel. These matters are exempt under 5 
U.S.C. 552b(c), (4) and (6) of the Government in the Sunshine Act.

    Dated: August 7, 2018.
Crystal Robinson,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 2018-17230 Filed 8-10-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 7555-01-P
<PAGE>


                                                                 Exhibit 3(ii).5


                        BURNHAM PACIFIC PROPERTIES, INC.
                               (the "Corporation")

                               AMENDMENT TO BYLAWS


        On August 14, 2000, the Board of Directors of the Corporation amended
the Bylaws of the Corporation by:

         Deleting therefrom the second sentence of ARTICLE II, Section 13(a)(2)
in its entirety and inserting the following in lieu thereof:

                     "To be timely, a stockholder's notice shall be delivered to
         the secretary at the principal executive offices of the Corporation not
         later than the close of business on the 50th day nor earlier than the
         close of business on the 90th day prior to the first anniversary of the
         preceding year's annual meeting; provided however, that in the event
         that the date of the annual meeting is advanced by more than 30 days or
         delayed by more than 60 days from such anniversary date or if the
         Corporation has not previously held an annual meeting, notice by the
         stockholder to be timely must be so delivered not earlier than the
         close of business on the 90th day prior to such annual meeting and not
         later than the close of business on the later of the 50th day prior to
         such annual meeting or the tenth day following the day on which public
         announcement of the date of such meeting is first made by the
         Corporation."



                                        6
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Small Business Administration

          - 13 CFR Part 121

      ( print page 40660)    

### CFR Correction

In Title 13 of the Code of Federal Regulations, revised as of January 1, 2018, on page 393, in § 121.201, in the table “Small Business Size Standards by NAICS Industry”, the entry for NAICS code 336999 under Subsector 336 is completed by adding “All Other Transportation Equipment Manufacturing” under NAICS U.S. industry title and “1,000” under Size standards in number of employees.

[FR Doc. 2018-17794 Filed 8-15-18; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE 1301-00-D
# C_2014087EN.01000201.xml

| 26.3.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 87/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.3.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 87/2

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.7139 — GDF SUEZ/Omnes Capital/Predica Prevoyance/FEIH)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2014/C 87/02

On 19 March 2014, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32014M7139. EUR-Lex is the online access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32014M7139. EUR-Lex is the online access to the European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
#### HENICAN, JAMES AND CLEVELAND, a partnership v. Mrs. Mildred CHIASSON, divorced wife of Zachary A. Strate.

No. 60542.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Oct. 26, 1977.

In re: Henican, James & Cleveland, A Partnership applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, Parish of Orleans, 348 So.2d 689.

Writ denied.

SANDERS, C. J., and CALOGERO, J.,

would grant the writ.
1

COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

IN RE: CEMEX CONSTRUCTION 

MATERIALS PACIFIC SOUTH, L.L.C.,

 

 Relator.

§

§

§

§

§

No. 08-18-00135-CV

AN ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

IN MANDAMUS

O R D E R

Pending before the Court is the Relator’s motion to stay all proceedings, including the

discovery order signed by the Honorable Linda Y. Chew, Judge of the 327th District Court of El 

Paso County, Texas, on July 17, 2018, in cause number 2017-DCV1047, styled Christine Borrego, 

as Executor of the Estate and Statutory Death Beneficiary of Johnny Borrego; and Melissa Ruiz, 

Individually, and Robben Lee Betancourt, as Executor of the Estate and Statutory Death 

Beneficiary of Ruben Betancourt Ramirez, and Jose Gabino Garcia and Humbero Muela, both 

individually, v. Cemex El Paso, Inc., Cemex Construction Materials South, LLC, Jobe Materials, 

LP, and Ranchos Real Land Holdings, LLC. The motion to stay is granted only with respect to 

the July 17, 2018 discovery order. The request to stay all proceedings in the case is denied. The 

stay will remain in effect pending resolution of this original proceeding or further order of this 

Court. 
2

Further, the Court has determined that no action will be taken on the Relator’s Petition for 

Writ of Mandamus pending a response from the Real Party(ies) in Interest. The response is due 

on or before August 30, 2018.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 31

st day of July, 2018.

PER CURIAM

Before McClure, C.J., Rodriguez and Palafox, JJ.