alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit



Exhibit 10.2



REVOLVING NOTE


$35,000,000.00    Sioux Falls, South Dakota
November 15, 2016




DAKTRONICS, INC., a South Dakota corporation (the “Borrower”), promises to pay to the order of U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, a national banking association (the “Lender”) at 141 North Main Avenue, Sioux Falls, South Dakota 57104, the principal amount of Thirty-five Million and No/100 Dollars ($35,000,000.00) or, if less, the aggregate unpaid principal amount of all Revolving Loans made by the Lender to the Borrower pursuant to Section 2.1(a) of the Agreement (as hereinafter defined), in immediately available funds, together with interest on the unpaid principal amount hereof at the rates and on the dates set forth in the Agreement.  The Borrower shall pay the principal of and accrued and unpaid interest on the Revolving Loans in full on the Facility Termination Date.


The Lender is hereby authorized to record in accordance with its usual practice the date and amount of each Revolving Loan and the date and amount of each principal payment hereunder.


This Revolving Note is the Note issued pursuant to, and is entitled to the benefits of, the Credit Agreement dated November 15, 2016 (which, as it may be amended or modified and in effect from time to time, is herein called the “Agreement”), between the Borrower and the Lender, to which Agreement reference is hereby made for a statement of the terms and conditions governing this Revolving Note, including the terms and conditions under which this Revolving Note may be prepaid or its maturity date accelerated.  Capitalized terms used herein and not otherwise defined herein are used with the meanings attributed to them in the Agreement.


In the event of default hereunder, the undersigned agrees to pay all costs and expenses of collection, including reasonable attorneys’ fees.  The undersigned waives demand, presentment, notice of nonpayment, protest, notice of protest and notice of dishonor.


THE VALIDITY, CONSTRUCTION AND ENFORCEABILITY OF THIS NOTE SHALL BE GOVERNED BY THE INTERNAL LAWS OF THE STATE OF SOUTH DAKOTA WITHOUT GIVING EFFECT TO THE CONFLICT OF LAWS PRINCIPLES THEREOF, BUT GIVING EFFECT TO FEDERAL LAWS OF THE UNITED STATES APPLICABLE TO NATIONAL BANKS.


                        


[signature page follows]


1
{02422594.2}








DAKTRONICS, INC.


     /s/ Reece A. Kurtenbach
     Reece A. Kurtenbach, Chief Executive Officer    
   


     /s/ Sheila M. Anderson
     Sheila M. Anderson, Chief Financial Officer




		
	STATE OF SOUTH DAKOTA
	)


: SS
		
	COUNTY OF BROOKINGS
	)




On this the 15th day of November, 2016, before me personally appeared Reece A. Kurtenbach, known to me to be the Chief Executive Officer, and Sheila M. Anderson, known to me to be the Chief Financial Officer, of Daktronics, Inc., the corporation that is described in and that executed the within instrument and acknowledged to me that such corporation executed the same.


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I hereunto set my hand and official seal.




/s/ Jan Mandel
Notary Public - South Dakota
My Commission Expires:
June 11, 2020


2
{02422594.2}
May 20, 2015

Mr. Ken Fayal

61359 Rock Bluff Lane Bend, OR 97702

Dear Mr. Ken Fayal:

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your request for an exemption. It explains why we can not process your request and what you should do in the next 30 days.

Why We Can Not Process Your Request

We entered your March 25th, 2015 exemption request on behalf into the public docket (No. FAA-2015-0755), but we are unable to pr ocess your request any further. The information you sent does not comply with the requirements of § 11.81 (copy enclosed). For us to consider the request any further, you must send us all of the following:

 The specific section or sections of 14 CFR from which you seek relief, the extent of the relief you seek, and the reason you seek relief.

 The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, how it would benefit the public as a whole.

 The reasons why the exemption would not adversely affect safety or how the exemption would provide a level of safety at least equal to that provided by the rule from which you seek an exemption.

 Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your request.2

What You Should Do

If you want us to process your request any further, you must send the information described earlier to reach us within 30 days. Please note that § 11.63(d) requires you to send your petition for exemption at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption.

If We Do Not Hear From You

If we do not hear from you within 30 days, we will close the docket without notifying you further. If you have any questions or require additional time, you may call (202) 267-9677.

Sincerely,

/s/

Brenda Robeson Program Analyst, Airmen and Airspace Rules Division

Enclosure
# C_2013064EN.01000901.xml

| 5.3.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 64/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.3.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 64/9

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

4 March 2013

2013/C 64/07

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,3007 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 121,67 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4555 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,86400 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 8,3801 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,2256 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 7,4455 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 25,660 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 296,71 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,7004 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,1398 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,3650 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,3444 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,2821 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,3380 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 10,0878 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,5818 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,6212 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 419,30 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 11,8202 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 8,0979 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,5955 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 12 636,45 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,0413 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 53,085 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 39,9987 |
| THB | Thai baht | 38,800 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 2,5809 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 16,6451 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 71,3630 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,3007

JPY

Japanese yen

121,67

DKK

Danish krone

7,4555

GBP

Pound sterling

0,86400

SEK

Swedish krona

8,3801

CHF

Swiss franc

1,2256

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

7,4455

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

25,660

HUF

Hungarian forint

296,71

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,7004

PLN

Polish zloty

4,1398

RON

Romanian leu

4,3650

TRY

Turkish lira

2,3444

AUD

Australian dollar

1,2821

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,3380

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

10,0878

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,5818

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,6212

KRW

South Korean won

1 419,30

ZAR

South African rand

11,8202

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

8,0979

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,5955

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

12 636,45

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,0413

PHP

Philippine peso

53,085

RUB

Russian rouble

39,9987

THB

Thai baht

38,800

BRL

Brazilian real

2,5809

MXN

Mexican peso

16,6451

INR

Indian rupee

71,3630

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
# C_2013029EN.01000401.xml

| 31.1.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 29/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

31.1.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 29/4

---

NOTICE OF OPEN COMPETITION

2013/C 29/04

The European Personnel Selection Office (EPSO) is organising the following open competition:

EPSO/AD/248/13 — Administrators (AD 6) in the building sector in the following fields:

| 1. | Security of buildings |
| --- | --- |

1.

Security of buildings

| 2. | Engineering in specialised building techniques |
| --- | --- |

2.

Engineering in specialised building techniques

The competition notice is published in 23 languages in Official Journal C 29 A of 31 January 2013.

Further information can be found on the EPSO website: http://blogs.ec.europa.eu/eu-careers.info/

---
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 3147

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to make the targeted jobs

credit permanent and to treat as a member of a targeted group every

individual who has received a Department of Defense campaign ribbon,

liberation ribbon, or national defense service medal.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

SEPTEMBER 28, 1993

Mr. EDWARDS of Texas (for himself, Mr. MCCRERY, Mr. JEFFERSON, Mr.

MCCLOSKEY, Mr. FISH, Mr. FROST, Ms. EDDIE BERNICE JOHNSON of

Texas, Mr. HAYES, Mr. CHAPMAN, Mr. SARPALIUS, Mr. LANCASTER, Mr.

BAKER of Louisiana, Mr. FILNER, and Mr. LEVY) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

A BILL

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to make

the targeted jobs credit permanent and to treat as a

member of a targeted group every individual who has

received a Department of Defense campaign ribbon, liberation ribbon, or national defense service medal.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 3147 IH

1 SECTION 1. TARGETED JOBS CREDIT MADE PERMANENT;

2 RECIPIENTS OF CERTAIN DEPARTMENT OF

3 DEFENSE RIBBONS AND MEDALS TREATED

4 AS MEMBERS OF TARGETED GROUP.

5 (a) CREDIT MADE PERMANENT.—

6 (1) IN GENERAL.—Subsection (c) of section 51

7 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to

8 targeted jobs credit) is amended by striking para9 graph (4).

10 (2) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made

11 by paragraph (1) shall apply to individuals who

12 begin work for the employer after June 30, 1992.

13 (b) RECIPIENTS OF CERTAIN DEPARTMENT OF DE14 FENSE RIBBONS AND MEDALS TREATED AS MEMBERS OF

15 A TARGETED GROUP.—

16 (1) IN GENERAL.—Subparagraph (C) of section

17 51(d)(1) of such Code (relating to members of tar18 geted groups) is amended to read as follows:

19 ‘‘(C) a conflict-era veteran,’’.

20 (2) CONFLICT-ERA VETERAN.—Paragraph (4)

21 of section 51(d) of such Code is amended to read as

22 follows:

23 ‘‘(4) CONFLICT-ERA VETERAN.—The term ‘con24 flict-era veteran’ means any individual who is cer25 tified by the designated local agency as having been

26 awarded by the Department of Defense—
3

•HR 3147 IH

1 ‘‘(A) a campaign ribbon,

2 ‘‘(B) a liberation ribbon, or

3 ‘‘(C) a national defense service medal.’’

4 (3) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made

5 by this subsection shall apply to individuals who

6 begin work for the employer after December 31,

7 1992.

Æ
#### STATE of Florida, Appellant, v. Otis Neal FELTON, Jr., and Barbara Jean Felton, Appellees.

No. T-327.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Dec. 27, 1973.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF MDU COMMUNICATIONS INTERNATIONAL,
INC. FOR THE QUARTER AND NINE MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2000, AND IS QUALIFIED IT
ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-2000             SEP-30-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000             JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                       6,421,488               6,421,488
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  146,221                 146,221
<ALLOWANCES>                                  (22,000)                (22,000)
<INVENTORY>                                          0                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             6,787,985               6,787,985
<PP&E>                                       5,912,990               5,912,990
<DEPRECIATION>                               (602,082)               (602,082)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              12,203,243              12,203,243
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,156,725               1,156,725
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                  8,679,973               8,679,973
<COMMON>                                     5,588,789               5,588,789
<OTHER-SE>                                 (3,222,244)             (3,222,244)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                12,203,243              12,203,243
<SALES>                                        310,644                 896,433
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               410,836               1,076,866
<CGS>                                          110,022                 436,671
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,318,888              10,699,029
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0              11,502,222
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                  22,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,602                  52,845
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,908,052)             (9,622,163)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (1,908,052)             (9,622,163)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,908,052)            (21,124,385)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.14)                  (1.71)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.14)                  (1.71)


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32

       CERTIFICATION REQUIRED BY 18 U.S.C.SS.1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the annual report of Decorator Industries, Inc. ("the
Company") on Form 10-K for the annual period ended December 31, 2005, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
we, William A. Bassett, Chief Executive Officer and President of the Company,
and Michael K. Solomon, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.

          Date: March 29, 2006               By: /s/  William A. Bassett
                --------------                   ------------------------------
                                                 William A. Bassett,
                                                 Chief Executive Officer and
                                                 President


          Date: March 29, 2006               By: /s/  Michael K. Solomon
                --------------                   ------------------------------
                                                 Michael K. Solomon,
                                                 Chief Financial Officer
# C_2014052EN.01000202.xml

| 22.2.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 52/2 |
| --------- | -- | -------------------------------------- | ------ |

---

Decisions adopted by the Court in its General Meeting on 5 November 2013

2014/C 52/03

At its General Meeting on 5 November 2013, the Court decided to assign Ms Jürimäe to the Fourth and Ninth Chambers.

Consequently, the composition of the Fourth and Ninth Chambers is as set out below.

| | Fourth Chamber
Mr Bay Larsen, President of the Chamber Mr Malenovský, Ms Jürimäe, Mr Safjan and Ms Prechal, Judges | | Mr Bay Larsen, President of the Chamber | | Mr Malenovský, Ms Jürimäe, Mr Safjan and Ms Prechal, Judges |
| | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | | --------------------------------------- | | ----------------------------------------------------------- |
| | Mr Bay Larsen, President of the Chamber | | | | |
| | Mr Malenovský, Ms Jürimäe, Mr Safjan and Ms Prechal, Judges | | | | |

| | Ninth Chamber
Mr Safjan, President of the Chamber Mr Malenovský, Ms Prechal and Ms Jürimäe, Judges | | Mr Safjan, President of the Chamber | | Mr Malenovský, Ms Prechal and Ms Jürimäe, Judges |
| | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | | ----------------------------------- | | ------------------------------------------------ |
| | Mr Safjan, President of the Chamber | | | | |
| | Mr Malenovský, Ms Prechal and Ms Jürimäe, Judges | | | | |

---
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 23.3

                                Yankwich & Associates
                               130 Bishop Allen Drive
                           Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139
                              Telephone: (617) 491-4343
                              Facsimile: (617) 491-8801




Leon R. Yankwich
Direct Line: (617) 491-8909

August 14, 2000

                          Consent of Yankwich & Associates

     Yankwich & Associates hereby consents to the reference to the firm under
the caption `Experts' in the Prospectus that is a part of the Registration
Statement on Form S-1 of Dyax Corp.



                                                     /s/ Leon R. Yankwich
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO
 18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350
 
 In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Pharmacyclics, Inc., a Delaware
corporation (the “Company”), on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30,
2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I,
Robert W. Duggan, Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.
§ 1350), that to my knowledge:
 
 (1) The Report fully complies with the
requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and
 
 (2) The information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of the Company.
  /s/
      Robert W. DugganRobert
      W. DugganChairman
      of the Board and Chief Executive OfficerNovember
      3, 2009
 CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO
 18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350
 
 In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Pharmacyclics, Inc, a Delaware
corporation (the “Company”), on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30,
2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I,
Rainer M. Erdtmann, Vice President, Finance and Administration and Secretary of
the Company, certify, pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18
U.S.C. § 1350), that to my knowledge:
 
 (1) The Report fully complies with the
requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and
 
 (2) The information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of the Company.
  /s/
      Rainer M. ErdtmannRainer
      M. ErdtmannVice
      President, Finance and Administration and Secretary (Principal Accounting
      and Financial Officer)November
      3, 2009
#### Jessie SHOEMAKER, Petitioner, v. Louie L. WAINWRIGHT, Director, Division of Corrections, State of Florida, Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services, Respondent.

No. 71-26.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Jan. 26, 1971.

Habeas corpus denied.
**Exhibit 32.1**
SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION
I, E. Randall Chestnut, Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer of CrownCrafts, Inc. (the “Company”), do hereby certify, in accordance with 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adoptedpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:
1. The Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the period ending April 3, 2005 (the“Periodic Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
2. The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
Dated: June 15, 2005               /s/ E. Randall Chestnut   E. Randall Chestnut, Chairman of the Board,   President and Chief Executive Officer
1

In The

Court of Appeals

Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

________________

NO. 09-13-00298-CV 

________________

IN THE INTEREST OF T.H.

__________________________________________________________________

On Appeal from the 317th District Court

Jefferson County, Texas

Trial Cause No. C-216,393

__________________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant D.M., the father of the minor child T.H., appeals the trial court’s 

final order in a suit affecting the parent-child relationship. We affirm the trial 

court’s order.

The Department of Family and Protective Services (“the Department”) filed 

an original petition for protection of a child, for conservatorship, and for 

termination in a suit affecting the parent-child relationship. After conducting an 

evidentiary hearing, the trial court did not terminate D.M.’s parental rights, but 

instead appointed T.H.’s maternal grandparents permanent managing conservators 
2

of T.H. and appointed D.M. possessory conservator. The trial court’s order 

provided that D.M. would have access to T.H. unless he should appear to be under 

the influence; gave the managing conservators the right to supervise D.M.’s visits 

and to require D.M. to submit to a drug test; and prohibited D.M. from having 

overnight or unsupervised visits with T.H. 

D.M.’s appointed counsel submitted a brief in which he concludes that there 

are no arguable grounds to be advanced on appeal. The brief provides counsel’s 

professional evaluation of the record, and counsel notified D.M. that he found no 

meritorious issues for appeal, provided a copy of the record to D.M., and notified 

D.M. of his right to file a pro se brief. Because this proceeding began as one in 

which the Department sought termination of parental rights, this Court accepted 

the Anders brief filed by appointed counsel. See High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807 

(Tex. Crim. App. 1978); see generally Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967); 

In the Interest of L.D.T., 161 S.W.3d 728, 731 (Tex. App.—Beaumont 2005, no 

pet.) (applying Anders procedure in an appeal from termination of parental rights). 

This Court also notified appellant of his right to file a pro se response, as well as 

the deadline for filing it. We received no response from D.M.

After reviewing the clerk’s record, the reporter’s record, and counsel’s brief, 

we agree with counsel’s conclusion that there are no plausible grounds for appeal. 
3

We find no arguable error requiring us to order appointment of new counsel to rebrief this appeal. Compare Stafford v. State, 813 S.W.2d 503, 511 (Tex. Crim. 

App. 1991). We affirm the trial court’s order appointing D.M. possessory 

conservator of the minor child T.H. and grant appellate counsel’s motion to 

withdraw.

AFFIRMED. 

______________________________

 STEVE McKEITHEN

 Chief Justice

Submitted on November 5, 2013

Opinion Delivered November 21, 2013

Before McKeithen, C.J., Kreger and Horton, JJ.