alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
CHARLES CASTON, 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA 

aka ELIJAH MUHAMMAD, JR., 

Plaintiff, 

FILED 

FEB 1 J 2009 

NAN~Y MAYER WHITT. . 

U.S. D1STftt!T ~~ Q,fR« 

v. 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

Civil Action No. 09 0281 

SWITZERLAND, et al., 

Defendants. 

MEMORANDUM OPINION 

This matter comes before the court on review of plaintiff s application to proceed in 

forma pauperis and pro se civil complaint. The court will grant the application, and dismiss the 

complaint. 

The court must dismiss a complaint if it is frivolous, malicious, or fails to state a claim 

upon which relief can be granted. 28 U.S.c. § 1915(E)(1)(B). In Neitzke v. Williams, 490 U.S. 

319 (1989), the Supreme Court states that the trial court has the authority to dismiss not only 

claims based on an indisputably meritless legal theory, but also claims whose factual contentions 

are clearly baseless. Claims describing fantastic or delusional scenarios fall into the category of 

cases whose factual contentions are clearly baseless. Id. at 328. The trial court has the discretion 

to decide whether a complaint is frivolous, and such finding is appropriate when the facts alleged 

are irrational or wholly incredible. Denton v. Hernandez, 504 U.S. 25, 33 (1992). 

Plaintiff alleges that defendants, among which are a foreign nation and professional sports 

teams, have violated unspecified rights protected by the Fourth, Fifth, Sixth and Eighth 

1 
Amendments to the United States Constitution. He further alleges that defendants have stolen oil 

paintings and photographs from him and have deprived him of sleep. Plaintiff demands the 

replacement of all court judges and all police officers, as well as the return of property seized by 

Switzerland. 

The court is mindful that complaints filed by pro se litigants are held to less stringent 

standards than those applied to formal pleadings drafted by lawyers. See Haines v. Kerner, 404 

U.S. 519, 520 (1972). Having reviewed plaintiffs complaint, it appears that its factual 

contentions are baseless and wholly incredible. For this reason, the complaint is frivolous and 

must be dismissed. 

An Order consistent with this Memorandum Opinion is issued separately. 

Date: ~. ;). ~I D2.0t) 'I 

2
#### Mrs. Gladys Marie LEGER et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. SOUTHERN FARM BUREAU CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY and John E. Richard, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 3914.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Third Circuit.

Aug. 4, 1972.

Cormie & Morgan by Robert E. Morgan, Lake Charles, for plaintiff-appellant.

*266Holt & Woodley by Meredith T. Holt, Camp, Carmouche, Palmer, Carwile & Barsh by Harry E. Barsh, Jr., Plauché, Smith & Hebert by Allen L. Smith, Jr., Lake Charles, for defendant-appellee.

Before FRUGÉ, SAVOY and CULPEP-PER, JJ.

FRUGE, Judge.

For the reasons assigned in the companion suit Leger v. Southern Farm Bureau Casualty Insurance Company et al., 265 So.2d 264 (La.App. 3rd Cir., 1972), decided this date, the judgment appealed from is reversed, and the case is remanded for a trial by jury on the merits.

Appellees are to pay all costs of this appeal.

Reversed and remanded.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Elizabeth A. Weaver

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

March 19, 2010 

jam 

Order 

 

March 19, 2010 

140212 

MICHAEL D. RAINEY, 

 Plaintiff-Appellant, 

v SC: 140212 

 CoA: 294360 

DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, 

 Defendant-Appellee. 

___________________________________ 

 On order of the Chief Justice, plaintiff-appellant having failed to pay the 

partial filing fee as required by the order of January 22, 2010, the Clerk of the Court is 

hereby directed to close this file.
# C_2013162EN.01000801.xml

| 7.6.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 162/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.6.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 162/8

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.6842 — Goldman Sachs/TPG Lundy/Verna Group)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2013/C 162/04

On 14 May 2013, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32013M6842. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32013M6842. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.

---
M E M O R A N D U M

To: File

From: Wienke Tax, EPA Region IX, Air Planning Office

Date: January 14, 2011

Concerning: EPA Proposed Rule to Partially Approve and Partially Disapprove San Joaquin Valley Fine

Particulate Matter (PM2.5) Attainment Plan

– Meeting Notes, Community Meeting in

Fresno, January 10, 2011.

_____________________________

On Monday, January 10, 2011, EPA Region 9 hosted a meeting in Fresno, California, with residents of the

San Joaquin Valley (SJV) and representatives from environmental and advocacy organizations. The

purpose of the meeting was to explain EPA’s proposed action on the SJV PM2.5 Attainment Plan and

how to participate in EPA’s rulemaking process. See 75 FR 74518 (Nov. 30, 2010).

EPA staff explained basic Clean Air Act (CAA) provisions such as the National Ambient Air Quality

Standards (NAAQS), and State Implementation Plan (SIP) requirements. Then EPA staff discussed what

was submitted by the California Air Resources Board (CARB) and the San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution

Control District (SJVAPCD) to address the CAA requirements for PM2.5 SIPs. Finally, EPA staff discussed

the proposed action taken on the SJV PM2.5 SIP. EPA staff answered questions from the audience

throughout the presentation.

The meeting handouts, and the PowerPoint presentation given by EPA are attached to this

memorandum.
#### Fred N. DUNN, Appellant, v. John J. BAESSLER, Ralph Bradley Ward, Arthur F. Wood, Harold F. Beard and Moseley Collins, Appellees.

No. 69-546.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Nov. 4, 1970.

Rehearing Denied Jan. 28, 1971.

Robert E. Austin, Jr., of Davis, McLin, Burnsed & Austin, Leesburg, and L. E. Brown, Tavares, for appellant.

William P. Doyle, Fort Lauderdale, ■ for John J. Baessler.

John T. Brennan, of Carlton Brennan & McAliley, Fort Pierce, for Arthur F. Wood, Harold F. Beard and Moseley Collins.

PER CURIAM.

On the basis of the briefs, record, and oral argument, it is our opinion that neither appellant nor the appellees who cross-assigned error have demonstrated reversible *781error; therefore, the judgment appealed from is hereby affirmed.

Affirmed.

REED, J., and COOPER, RICHARD H., Associate Judge, concur.

WALDEN, J., dissents, with opinion.

WALDEN, Judge

(dissenting).

It is my view that the trial court erred in its disposition of Count IV of Plaintiff’s -amended complaint.

I,therefore, dissent.
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 2867

To amend title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 with respect to establishing

an unlawful employment practice based on disparate treatment.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

AUGUST 4, 1993

Mr. HASTINGS introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Education and Labor

A BILL

To amend title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 with

respect to establishing an unlawful employment practice

based on disparate treatment.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Disparate Treatment

5 Employment Discrimination Amendment of 1993’’.

6 SEC. 2. AMENDMENT.

7 Section 706 of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (42

8 U.S.C. 2000e-5) is amended by adding at the end the fol9 lowing:
2

•HR 2867 IH

1 ‘‘(l)(1) An unlawful employment practice based on

2 disparate treatment is established if—

3 ‘‘(A) the complaining party, by a preponderance

4 of the evidence, proves a prima facie case that the

5 respondent engaged in conduct that constitutes un6 lawful disparate treatment based on race, color, reli7 gion, sex, or national origin; and

8 ‘‘(B) either—

9 ‘‘(i) the respondent fails to produce any

10 evidence to rebut such case; or

11 ‘‘(ii)(I) the respondent clearly articulates,

12 and produces evidence of, one or more legiti13 mate, nondiscriminatory reasons for the con14 duct alleged to be the unlawful disparate treat15 ment; and

16 ‘‘(II) the complaining party demonstrates

17 that each of such reasons is not true, but a pre18 text for discrimination that is the unlawful dis19 parate practice.

20 ‘‘(2) Paragraph (1) shall not be construed to specify

21 the only method by which an unlawful employment prac22 tice based on disparate treatment may be established.’’.

Æ
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3110 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 3110

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

               August 9 (legislative day, August 8), 1994

 Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and 
                              Public Works

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the United States courthouse and Federal building to be 
 constructed at the southeastern corner of Liberty and South Virginia 
   Streets in Reno, Nevada, as the ``Bruce R. Thompson United States 
                   Courthouse and Federal Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The United States courthouse and Federal building to be constructed 
at the southeastern corner of Liberty and South Virginia Streets in 
Reno, Nevada, is designated as the ``Bruce R. Thompson United States 
Courthouse and Federal Building''.

SEC. 2. LEGAL REFERENCES.

    Any reference in any law, regulation, document, record, map, or 
other paper of the United States to the courthouse and Federal building 
referred to in section 1 is deemed to be a reference to the ``Bruce R. 
Thompson United States Courthouse and Federal Building''.

            Passed the House of Representatives August 8, 1994.

            Attest:

                                           DONNALD K. ANDERSON,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
EXHIBIT 32



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Public Service Company of New Hampshire (the registrant) on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), we, Cheryl W. Grisé and David R. McHale,  certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the registrant.



/s/ Cheryl W. Grisé

(Signature)

Cheryl W. Grisé

Chief Executive Officer



/s/ David R. McHale

(Signature)

David R. McHale

Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer



March 16, 2005



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the registrant and will be retained by the registrant and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### Walter FLANSBURG, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 73-1534.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

March 28, 1974.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed.
U.S. flag
              An official website of the United States government Skip to main content   end of header Census.gov Newsroom Releases Health Care & Insurance Income & Wealth Poverty
 Newsroom Archive
 Skip left menu navigation
 About the Newsroom
 				Facts for Features
 				**News Releases**
 				Press Kits
 				Tip Sheets
 Release Information CB12-166 **Contact:**  Public Information Office
301-763-3030 Press kit  How We Measure Poverty and Income
 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:  WEDNESDAY, SEPT. 5, 2012 Media Advisory — Census Bureau to Announce Findings for Income, Poverty and Health Insurance Coverage What:
 The U.S. Census Bureau will hold an audio news conference to announce the findings from its report: *Income, Poverty, and Health Insurance Coverage in the United States: 2011*. This annual report contains the official national findings from the Current Population Survey (CPS). The Web conference will consist of a simultaneous audio conference and online presentation. There will be no physical event. Information on accessing the Web conference is provided below. Reporters will be able to ask questions during the audio conference once the presentation is complete. For information about setting up an interview with a subject matter expert, see below. These findings will not be embargoed.
 When:
 Wednesday, Sept. 12, 10 a.m. EDT
 Who:
 David Johnson, chief, Social, Economic and Housing Statistics Division, U.S. Census Bureau
 Online news
conference page
 The CPS report, data tables and news release will be posted online shortly
after the Web conference begins and can be accessed at 
<https://www.census.gov/newsroom/releases/archives/news_conferences/20120912_ip_newsconf.html>. We expect substantial interest in these findings. Therefore, we recommend that you log in to the audio conference and online presentation well in advance.
 Details:
 **Audio conference — access information**
Toll free number: 888-989-4394
Passcode: CENSUS Note: Stay on the line until operator asks for the passcode. Do not key in passcode.
 Online presentation — access information
 Please login early, as some setup is required.
URL: https://www.mymeetings.com/nc/join/
Conference number: PW2599186
Audience passcode: CENSUS
 If closed captioning is required: <http://livewrite.nccsite.com/view/cb0912>.




CONNECT WITH US
 Information Quality
                    Data Linkage Infrastructure
                    Data Protection and Privacy Policy
                    Accessibility      
                    FOIA
                    Inspector General
                    No FEAR Act
                    U.S. Department of Commerce
                    USA.gov
  Measuring America's People, Places, and Economy
EXHIBIT 31.1 / 31.2 CERTIFICATIONS  I,
David Carpenter, certify that:  1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of New Media
Insight Group, Inc. 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other
financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure
controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange
Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have; (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under my supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to me by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; (b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused
such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under my
supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of
financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external
purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles; (c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report my conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and (d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by this
report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and 5. I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internal
control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit
committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the
equivalent functions): (a) All significant deficiencies and material weakness in the design
or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control
over financial reporting. Date:
 March 15, 2011 /s/
David Carpenter David
Carpenter Principal
Executive and Financial Officer
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-7641

FRANK BLAKESLEE COX, III,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

DAVID ROBINSON, Warden; W. WILSON, Sergeant;

LIEUTENANT JOHNSON, Watch Commander; LINDA

HAGAMAN, Chief Secretary,

Defendants - Appellees,

and

V. FITZGERALD, Nurse; B. ARCHER, Nurse;

SERGEANT TAYLOR; NURSE CLAIRMOUNT; LEVESTER

THOMPSON, Head Doctor,

Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Rebecca B. Smith, District Judge.

(CA-97-549-2)

Submitted: March 25, 1999 Decided: March 31, 1999

Before WILKINS and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior

Circuit Judge.
2

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Frank Blakeslee Cox, III, Appellant Pro Se. Mark Ralph Davis,

OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for

Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
3

PER CURIAM:

Frank Blakeslee Cox, III, appeals from the district court’s

order granting summary judgment in favor of some of the Defendants

and denying the motion to dismiss claims against other Defendants

in this 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 1998) action. We dismiss

the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because the order is not

appealable. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final

orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (1994), and certain interlocutory and

collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (1994); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b);

Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541 (1949). The

order here appealed is neither a final order nor an appealable

interlocutory or collateral order.

We deny Cox’s motion for an immediate transfer to the protective custody unit at Keen Mountain Correctional Center and dismiss the appeal as interlocutory. We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

DISMISSED
U.S. flag
              An official website of the United States government





---

close


Japan
 Basic Facts Population
 People per sq. km
 Males per 100 females
 Children per woman
 Goods exported from U.S.
 Goods imported to U.S.
 Change in exports from U.S. for 2013 to 2022
 A Closer Look Source
 Comparisons
 Compared to the U.S.
 Compared to the World
 K = Thousands
				M = Millions
				B = Billions
  Merchandise Trade U.S. Trade in Manufactured Goods
 Top Exported Goods by U.S. State or Territory
 Population Current and Projected Population
 Population by Age and Sex
 Source and Notes Source: U.S. Census Bureau, International Database (demographic data) and USA Trade Online (trade data); Central Intelligence Agency, The World Fact Book (country reference maps). This application presents data for 228 countries and areas of the world with a 2024 population of 5,000 or more. For eleven of those countries and areas, only demographic data are presented. "Data not available" indicates that data are not available from this application.  In such instances, data may be available elsewhere at the census.gov website. Trade figures presented for France do not include data for overseas departments French Guiana, Guadeloupe, Martinique, Mayotte, and Reunion but do include data for dependencies Saint Barthelemy and Saint Martin.  Trade figures for the United Kingdom include data for crown dependencies Guernsey, Isle of Man, and Jersey. To learn more about world population projections, go to Notes on the World Population Clock. To learn more about international trade data, go to Guide to Foreign Trade Statistics. All trade figures are in U.S. dollars on a nominal basis.


CONNECT WITH US
 Information Quality
                    Data Linkage Infrastructure
                    Data Protection and Privacy Policy
                    Accessibility      
                    FOIA
                    Inspector General
                    No FEAR Act
                    U.S. Department of Commerce
                    USA.gov
  Measuring America's People, Places, and Economy
#### Raymond F. CARTER, Individually and as President of Citrus Heights Manor Civic Association, an unincorporated association, Appellant, v. DELBAR, INC., a Florida corporation, and Vilanor, Inc., a Florida corporation, Appellees.

No. 73-577.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Feb. 20, 1974.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.