alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                          12,934
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    552,886
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                       2,014,058
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                         1,971,951
<LOANS>                                        113,004
<ALLOWANCE>                                        100
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,811,661
<DEPOSITS>                                   1,407,947
<SHORT-TERM>                                 1,177,855
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                             45,549
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           24,232
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           298
<OTHER-SE>                                     155,780
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>               2,811,661
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  2,812
<INTEREST-INVEST>                               76,949
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                     0
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                79,761
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                              25,356
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              53,774
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           25,987
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                        0
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                 82,096
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 23,849
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                      23,849
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    15,387
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.52
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.50
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    2.08
<LOANS-NON>                                          0
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                   100
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                        0
<RECOVERIES>                                         0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                  100
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                               100
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0


</TABLE>
#### MERRYDALE GLASS WORKS, INC. v. Mike MERRIAM.

No. 60688.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Oct. 26, 1977.

In re: Merrydale Glass Works, Inc. applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, Parish of East Baton Rouge, 349 So.2d 1315.

Denied.
# C_2014020EN.01000501.xml

| 23.1.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 20/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.1.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 20/5

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

22 January 2014

(2014/C 20/05)

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,3566 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 141,57 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4622 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,81900 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 8,7958 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,2345 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,3655 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 27,535 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 302,18 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,1650 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,5266 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 3,0634 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,5291 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4876 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 10,5237 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,6268 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,7337 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 450,61 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 14,7038 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 8,2107 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,6385 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 16 472,27 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,5199 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 61,460 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 45,9745 |
| THB | Thai baht | 44,632 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 3,2072 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 18,0441 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 83,9530 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,3566

JPY

Japanese yen

141,57

DKK

Danish krone

7,4622

GBP

Pound sterling

0,81900

SEK

Swedish krona

8,7958

CHF

Swiss franc

1,2345

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,3655

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

27,535

HUF

Hungarian forint

302,18

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

PLN

Polish zloty

4,1650

RON

Romanian leu

4,5266

TRY

Turkish lira

3,0634

AUD

Australian dollar

1,5291

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4876

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

10,5237

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,6268

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,7337

KRW

South Korean won

1 450,61

ZAR

South African rand

14,7038

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

8,2107

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,6385

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

16 472,27

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,5199

PHP

Philippine peso

61,460

RUB

Russian rouble

45,9745

THB

Thai baht

44,632

BRL

Brazilian real

3,2072

MXN

Mexican peso

18,0441

INR

Indian rupee

83,9530

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
Order entered November 24, 2015

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-15-00853-CR

SELVIN SANTOS-HERNANDEZ, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 292nd Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. F13-30682-V

ORDER

The Court ORDERS the trial court to make findings of fact regarding whether appellant 

has been deprived of the reporter’s record because of ineffective counsel, indigence, or for any 

other reason.

 The trial court shall first determine whether appellant desires to prosecute the appeal. If 

the trial court determines that appellant does not desire to prosecute the appeal, it shall 

make a finding to that effect.

 If the trial court determines that appellant desires to prosecute the appeal, it shall next 

determine whether appellant is indigent and entitled to proceed without payment of costs 

for the reporter’s record. If appellant is entitled to proceed without payment of costs, the 

trial court shall make a finding to that effect. Moreover, if appellant is indigent, the trial 

court is ORDERED to take such measures as may be necessary to assure effective 

representation, which may include appointment of new counsel. If the trial court finds 

appellant is not indigent, it shall determine whether retained counsel has abandoned the 

appeal.
 The trial court shall next determine: (1) the name and address of each court reporter who 

recorded the proceedings in this cause; (2) the court reporter’s explanation for the delay 

in filing the reporter’s record; and (3) the earliest date by which the reporter’s record can 

be filed. 

We ORDER the trial court to transmit a record, containing the written findings of fact, 

any supporting documentation, and any orders, to this Court within THIRTY DAYS of the date 

of this order.

The appeal is ABATED to allow the trial court to comply with this order. The appeal 

shall be reinstated thirty days from the date of this order or when the findings are received, 

whichever is earlier.

/s/ LANA MYERS 

JUSTICE
#### Walter PRATER v. SCHUYLKILL PRODUCTS CO., INC.

No. 53934.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Sept. 26, 1973.

In re: Walter Prater applying for Cer-tiorari, or Writ of Review, to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, Parish of East Baton Rouge, 281 So.2d 829.

Writ denied. No error of law of judgment.
# C_2014079EN.01000401.xml

| 18.3.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 79/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.3.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 79/4

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

17 March 2014

2014/C 79/04

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,3906 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 141,45 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4633 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,83675 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 8,8604 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,2154 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,2800 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 27,411 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 312,30 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,2220 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,5078 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 3,0932 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,5311 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,5393 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 10,7981 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,6235 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,7594 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 484,94 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 14,9197 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 8,5895 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,6583 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 15 702,84 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,5570 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 62,081 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 50,7310 |
| THB | Thai baht | 44,843 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 3,2720 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 18,3712 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 85,2361 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,3906

JPY

Japanese yen

141,45

DKK

Danish krone

7,4633

GBP

Pound sterling

0,83675

SEK

Swedish krona

8,8604

CHF

Swiss franc

1,2154

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,2800

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

27,411

HUF

Hungarian forint

312,30

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

PLN

Polish zloty

4,2220

RON

Romanian leu

4,5078

TRY

Turkish lira

3,0932

AUD

Australian dollar

1,5311

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,5393

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

10,7981

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,6235

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,7594

KRW

South Korean won

1 484,94

ZAR

South African rand

14,9197

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

8,5895

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,6583

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

15 702,84

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,5570

PHP

Philippine peso

62,081

RUB

Russian rouble

50,7310

THB

Thai baht

44,843

BRL

Brazilian real

3,2720

MXN

Mexican peso

18,3712

INR

Indian rupee

85,2361

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                       1,943,000
<SECURITIES>                                 2,029,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    118,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             4,393,000
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,474,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,211,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       126,000
<OTHER-SE>                                   3,137,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 4,474,000
<SALES>                                         40,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                40,000
<CGS>                                           23,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,011,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (961,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (961,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.38)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        



</TABLE>
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 3077

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow tips received for

providing food or beverages for consumption off the employer’s premises

to be taken into account under the credit for the employer social security

tax on certain tips.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

SEPTEMBER 14, 1993

Mr. TALENT introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Ways and Means

A BILL

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow tips

received for providing food or beverages for consumption

off the employer’s premises to be taken into account

under the credit for the employer social security tax

on certain tips.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That (a) paragraph (2) of section 45B(b) of the Internal

4 Revenue Code of 1986 (defining excess employer social se5 curity tax) is amended to read as follows:

6 ‘‘(2) ONLY CERTAIN TIPS TAKEN INTO AC7 COUNT.—In applying paragraph (1), there shall be
2

•HR 3077 IH

1 taken into account only tips received from customers

2 in connection with the provision of food or beverages

3 in circumstances where the tipping of employees

4 serving food or beverages to customers is cus5 tomary.’’

6 (b) The amendment made by subsection (a) shall

7 apply to taxes paid after December 31, 1993.

Æ
Order entered October 6, 2016

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-16-00506-CV

STEVEN B. AUBREY, BENEFICIARY OF THE AUBREY FAMILY TRUST CREATED 

UNDER THE WILL OF RICHARD BUCK AUBREY, DECEASED, Appellant

V.

BETSY S. AUBREY, TRUSTEE OF THE AUBREY FAMILY TRUST CREATED 

UNDER THE WILL OF RICHARD BUCK AUBREY, DECEASED, Appellee

On Appeal from the 14th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DC-15-11685

ORDER

We GRANT appellant’s October 4, 2016, second unopposed motion for extension of 

time to file his amended brief. Appellant’s brief received by the Clerk of the Court on October 3, 

2016, is ORDERED filed as of the date of this order. Appellee’s brief shall be filed within 

THIRTY DAYS of the date of this order.

/s/ ELIZABETH LANG-MIERS 

JUSTICE
#### Sol BIALICK and Bialick Associates, Appellants, v. BEEFY KING INTERNATIONAL, INC. a Florida corporation, Appellee.

No. 72-7.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Oct. 4, 1972.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 00-10849 Conference Calendar

ROQUE T. ARANDA, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus JON KEY, Gaines County Sheriff; RICKY B. SMITH, District Attorney; GARY L. JOHNSON, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, INSTITUTIONAL DIVISION; BOARD OF PARDONS AND PAROLES, Defendants-Appellees.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 5:00-CV-198-C

-------------------- February 14, 2001 Before SMITH, BARKSDALE, and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: * Roque T. Aranda, Texas prisoner # 805045, appeals the dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint in which he alleged that his sentence had been improperly enhanced by the use of unauthenticated prior conviction records and that the Texas Board of Pardons and Paroles was improperly using those prior conviction records against him.No. 00-10849 -2- Aranda’s claim that his sentence was improperly enhanced is not cognizable because neither his conviction nor his sentence has been invalidated. See Heck v. Humphrey , 512 U.S. 477, 487 (1994). Aranda’s claim against the Texas Board of Pardons and Paroles is also without merit. Since, in Texas, it is entirely speculative whether an inmate will actually obtain parole, there is no constitutional expectancy of parole. Madison v. Parker , 104 F.3d 765, 768 (5th Cir. 1997). Because Aranda cannot show the violation of a clearly established constitutional right to parole, his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 claim must fail. See West v. Atkins , 487 U.S. 42, 48 (U.S. 1988). Aranda’s appeal is without arguable merit. See Howard v. King , 707 F.2d 215, 220 (5th Cir. 1983). It is DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2. The three-strikes provision of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g) “prohibits a prisoner from proceeding IFP if he has had three actions or appeals dismissed for frivolousness, maliciousness, or failure to state a claim.” Carson v. Johnson , 112 F.3d 818, 819 (5th Cir. 1997) (citing Adepegba v. Hammons , 103 F.3d 383, 385 (5th Cir. 1996)). Aranda has previously had at least one strike against him. Aranda v. Millsaps , No. 99-11394 (5th Cir. Aug. 29, 2000). Aranda has acquired another two strikes as a result of this frivolous complaint and appeal. See Adepegba , 103 F. 3d at 386-88. Additionally, Aranda today accumulates two more strikes in another appeal before this court. Aranda v. Shaw , No. 00- 10844. He now has at least five strikes. Accordingly, ArandaNo. 00-10849 -3- may no longer proceed IFP in any civil action or appeal filed while he is in prison unless he is under imminent danger of serious physical injury. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). APPEAL DISMISSED; ALL OUTSTANDING MOTIONS DENIED; 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g) BAR IMPOSED.
# CA2013182EN.01000101.xml

| 27.6.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CA 182/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.6.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CA 182/1

---

RESERVE LIST (1)

1

OPEN COMPETITION

EPSO/AD/235/12

CROATIAN-LANGUAGE (HR) LAWYER-LINGUISTS (AD 7)

(2013/C 182 A/01)

‘Court of Justice’ channel

| BIŽAJIĆ | Robert |
| --- | --- |
| BOŽAC | Ivana |
| IVANČEVIĆ | Ivana |
| KUKEC | Lana |
| ROMIĆ | Mirna |
| STANKOVIĆ | Danijel |
| ZELJKO | Maja |

BIŽAJIĆ

Robert

BOŽAC

Ivana

IVANČEVIĆ

Ivana

KUKEC

Lana

ROMIĆ

Mirna

STANKOVIĆ

Danijel

ZELJKO

Maja

The reserve list will be valid until 23 April 2016.

23 April 2016

---

(1)  A successful candidate may explicitly request her/his name not be published.

1

---
# C_2013187EN.01000601.xml

| 29.6.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 187/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.6.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 187/6

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.6848 — Aegon/Santander/Santander Vida/Santander Generales)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2013/C 187/04

On 29 April 2013, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32013M6848. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32013M6848. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.

---
#### LITTLE BEAVER THEATER, INC., a Florida corporation d/b/a Mini Adult Theatre, 7321 Collins Avenue, Miami Beach, Florida, Relator, v. Honorable Rhea GROSSMAN in her official capacity as Judge of the Eleventh Judicial Circuit and E. B. Leatherman, in his official capacity as Clerk of the Circuit Court of the Eleventh Judicial Circuit, Respondents.

No. 71-145.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Feb. 10, 1971.

PER CURIAM.

Prohibition dismissed.
11TH COURT OF APPEALS

EASTLAND, TEXAS

JUDGMENT

In the matter of the Estate of * From the County Court at Law

James Booker Hogan, deceased, of Brown County,

 Trial Court No. PRB014208

No. 11-20-00170-CV * June 9, 2022

* Memorandum Opinion by Williams, J. 

 (Panel consists of: Bailey, C.J.,

 Trotter, J., and Williams, J.)

This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that there is no

error in the order below. Therefore, in accordance with this court’s opinion, the 

order of the trial court is in all things affirmed. The costs incurred by reason of 

this appeal are taxed against Gary E. Hogan.
# C_2014385EN.01001201.xml

| 31.10.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 385/12 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

31.10.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 385/12

---

Notice for the attention of persons and entities subject to the restrictive measures provided for in Council Decision 2012/642/CFSP and in Council Regulation (EC) No 765/2006 concerning restrictive measures against Belarus

(2014/C 385/03)

The following information is brought to the attention of the persons and entities designated in the Annex to Council Decision 2012/642/CFSP, as amended by Council Decision 2014/750/CFSP (1), and in Annex I to Council Regulation (EC) No 765/2006, as implemented by Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1159/2014 (2) concerning restrictive measures against Belarus.

1

2

The Council of the European Union, after having reviewed the list of persons and entities designated in the above-mentioned Annexes, has determined that the restrictive measures provided for in Decision 2012/642/CFSP and Regulation (EC) No 765/2006 should continue to apply to those persons and entities. The grounds for designations of those persons and entities appear in the relevant entries in those Annexes.

The attention of the persons and entities concerned is drawn to the possibility of making an application to the competent authorities of the relevant Member State(s) as indicated in the websites in Annex II to Regulation (EC) No 765/2006, in order to obtain an authorisation to use frozen funds for basic needs or specific payments (cf. Article 3 of the Regulation).

The persons and entities concerned may submit a request to the Council before 1 September 2015, together with supporting documentation that the decision to include them on the above-mentioned list should be reconsidered, to the following address:

| Council of the European Union |
| --- |
| General Secretariat |
| DG C 1C |
| Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175 |
| 1048 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |
| E-mail: sanctions@consilium.europa.eu |

Council of the European Union

General Secretariat

DG C 1C

Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175

1048 Bruxelles/Brussel

BELGIQUE/BELGIË

E-mail: sanctions@consilium.europa.eu

Any observations received will be taken into account for the purpose of the Council's periodic review, pursuant to Article 8(2) of Decision 2012/642/CFSP and Article 8a(4) of Regulation (EC) No 765/2006, of the list of designated persons and entities.

---

(1)  OJ L 311, 31.10.2014, p. 39.

1

(2)  OJ L 311, 31.10.2014, p. 2.

2

---