alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>
                                                                               .
                                                                               .
                                                                               .


                                                                  EXHIBIT 12-21

                           THE DETROIT EDISON COMPANY
               COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>


                                                               Twelve Months Ended December 31
                                              ------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                2004          2003          2002          2001          2000
                                              ----------    ----------    ----------    ---------     ----------
<S>                                           <C>           <C>           <C>           <C>           <C>
(Millions of Dollars)

EARNINGS:
    Pretax earnings.......................       $214         $397         $534           $320         $586
    Fixed charges.........................        294          294          322            314          311
                                                 ----         ----         ----           ----         ----
NET EARNINGS                                     $508         $691         $856           $634         $897
                                                 ----         ----         ----           ----         ----


FIXED CHARGES:
    Interest expense......................       $280         $284         $319           $306         $277
       Adjustments........................         14           10            3              8           34
                                                 ----         ----         ----           ----         ----
FIXED CHARGES                                    $294         $294         $322           $314          311
                                                 ----         ----         ----           ----         ----
Ratio of earnings to fixed charges               1.73         2.35         2.66           2.02         2.88
                                                 ====         ====         ====           ====         ====

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3369 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3369

  To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to exempt certain Small 
Business Administration financing from the provisions of section 514 of 
                               such Code.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 26, 1993

  Mr. Rangel introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to exempt certain Small 
Business Administration financing from the provisions of section 514 of 
                               such Code.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled, That (a) subsection (c) 
of section 514 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (defining 
acquisition indebtedness) is amended by adding at the end thereof the 
following new paragraph:
            ``(10) Certain sba financing.--For purposes of this 
        section, the term `acquisition indebtedness' does not include 
        any participating or other security (including debentures) 
        issued by a small business investment company licensed pursuant 
        to section 301(c), or operating under the authority of section 
        301(d), of the Small Business Investment Act of 1958, as 
        amended, but only if such security is purchased or guaranteed, 
        or is part of a pool or trust with respect to which trust 
        certificates are guaranteed, by the Small Business 
        Administration under such Act.''
    (b) The amendment made by subsection (a) shall apply to taxable 
years beginning after the date of the enactment of this Act.

                                 <all>
```
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

November 5, 2018

No. 04-18-00392-CR

STATE of Texas,

Appellant

v.

Lee Allison GOINS,

Appellee

From the 187th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2018CR2733

Honorable Joey Contreras, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

The Appellee’s Motion for Extension of Time to File Brief is GRANTED. The appellee’s 

brief is due on November 30, 2018.

_________________________________

Marialyn Barnard, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 5th day of November, 2018.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
ex10a.htm
















Exhibit (10)(a)

















Consent of Ernst & Young LLP, Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm












We consent to the reference to our firm under the caption “Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm” in Post-Effective Amendment No. 15 to the 1933 Act Registration Statement (Form N-4 No. 333-175691) and Amendment No. 375 to the 1940 Act Registration Statement (Form N-4 No. 811-09763), and to the use therein of our reports dated (a) March 31, 2016, with respect to the financial statements of Lincoln Life & Annuity Company of New York and (b) April 12, 2016, with respect to the financial statements of Lincoln New York Account N for Variable Annuities for the interests in a separate account under individual flexible payment deferred variable annuity contracts.







/s/ Ernst & Young LLP




 












Philadelphia, Pennsylvania


November 16, 2016
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OFTHE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

I, Paul J.B, Murphy, III, as Chairman andChief Executive Officer of New World Restaurant Group, Inc. (the “Company”),certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)          the Quarterly Report ofthe Company on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 29, 2004, as filed withthe Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of1934; and

 

(2)          the informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| August 5, 2004 | By: /s/ PAUL J. B. MURPHY, III       |
|---------------------|--------------------------------------|
|                | Paul J. B. Murphy, III               |
|                | Chairman and Chief Executive Officer |
|                | Principal Executive Officer          |

 

----
# C_2013182EN.01000201.xml

| 27.6.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 182/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.6.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 182/2

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

26 June 2013

2013/C 182/02

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,3024 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 127,33 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4599 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,84820 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 8,7615 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,2262 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 7,9470 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 25,858 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 297,28 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,7023 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,3445 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,4500 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,5208 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,4033 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,3649 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 10,1048 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,6730 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,6602 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 506,81 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 13,1663 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 8,0065 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,4595 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 12 977,00 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,1780 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 56,631 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 42,8745 |
| THB | Thai baht | 40,609 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 2,8828 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 17,2046 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 79,1100 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,3024

JPY

Japanese yen

127,33

DKK

Danish krone

7,4599

GBP

Pound sterling

0,84820

SEK

Swedish krona

8,7615

CHF

Swiss franc

1,2262

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

7,9470

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

25,858

HUF

Hungarian forint

297,28

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,7023

PLN

Polish zloty

4,3445

RON

Romanian leu

4,4500

TRY

Turkish lira

2,5208

AUD

Australian dollar

1,4033

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,3649

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

10,1048

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,6730

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,6602

KRW

South Korean won

1 506,81

ZAR

South African rand

13,1663

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

8,0065

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,4595

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

12 977,00

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,1780

PHP

Philippine peso

56,631

RUB

Russian rouble

42,8745

THB

Thai baht

40,609

BRL

Brazilian real

2,8828

MXN

Mexican peso

17,2046

INR

Indian rupee

79,1100

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3174 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3174

     To suspend until January 1, 1997, the duty on finasteride and 
                          finasteride tablets.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 29, 1993

   Ms. Margolies-Mezvinsky introduced the following bill; which was 
              referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
     To suspend until January 1, 1997, the duty on finasteride and 
                          finasteride tablets.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. SUSPENSION OF DUTY ON FINASTERIDE AND FINASTERIDE TABLETS.

    Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of 
the United States is amended by inserting in numerical sequence the 
following new headings:
      

``  9902.31.12  N-(1,1-dimethylethyl-3-                   No change        No change        On or before 12/    
                 oxo-4-aza-5-alpha-                                                          31/96           '';
                 androst-1-ene-17-beta-                                                                      and
                 carboxamide                                                                                    
                 (finasteride)                                                                                  
                 (provided for in                                                                               
                 subheading 2933.79.50)  Free                                                                   
    9902.32.02  N-(1,1-dimethylethyl-3-                   No change        No change        On or before 12/    
                 oxo-4-aza-5-alpha-                                                          31/96           ''.
                 androst-1-ene-17-beta-                                                                         
                 carboxamide tablets                                                                            
                 (finasteride tablets)                                                                          
                 (provided for in                                                                               
                 subheading 3004.90.60)  Free                                                                   

SEC. 2. EFFECTIVE DATE.

    The amendment made by section 1 applies with respect to goods 
entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after the 
15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.

                                 <all>
```
vvus_EX 10-1


		
			Exhibit 10.1
		

		
			 
		

		
			 
		

		
			 
		

		
			August 29, 2016
		

		
			 
		

		
			Via email:
		

		
			 
		

		
			John Slebir
		

		
			General Counsel
		

		
			VIVUS, Inc.
		

		
			351 E. Evelyn Ave.
		

		
			Mountain View, CA 94041
		

		
			 
		

		
			Re:Termination Notice
		

		
			 
		

		
			Dear Mr. Slebir:
		

		
			 
		

		
			This is to confirm our agreement that the date of termination of the License and Commercialization Agreement between VIVUS, Inc. and Auxilium Pharmaceuticals, LLC (formerly Auxilium Pharmaceuticals, Inc.), an Endo international company, dated October 10, 2013 (the “License Agreement”), is hereby extended to September  30, 2016.
		

		
			 
		

		
			Sincerely,
		

		
			 
		

		
			AUXILIUM PHARMACEUTICALS, LLCENDO VENTURES LIMITED
		

		
			 
		

		
			/s/ Deanne Voss/s/ Robert Cobuzzi
		

		
			Deanne VossRobert Cobuzzi
		

		
			Assistant SecretaryDirector
		

		
			 
		

		
			 
		

		
			 
		

		
			Accepted and agreed:
		

		
			 
		

		
			VIVUS, INC.
		

		
			 
		

		
			/s/ John L. Slebir
		

		
			John L. Slebir
		

		
			SVP, General Counsel
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 2868

To designate the Federal building located at 600 Camp Street in New

Orleans, Louisiana, as the ‘‘John Minor Wisdom United States Courthouse’’.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

AUGUST 4, 1993

Mr. JEFFERSON (for himself, Mr. LIVINGSTON, Mr. TAUZIN, Mr. FIELDS of

Louisiana, Mr. MCCRERY, Mr. BAKER of Louisiana, and Mr. HAYES) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Public Works and Transportation

A BILL

To designate the Federal building located at 600 Camp

Street in New Orleans, Louisiana, as the ‘‘John Minor

Wisdom United States Courthouse’’.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

4 The Federal building located at 600 Camp Street in

5 New Orleans, Louisiana, shall be known and designated

6 as the ‘‘John Minor Wisdom United States Courthouse’’.

7 SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

8 Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document,

9 paper, or other record of the United States to the Federal
2

•HR 2868 IH

1 building referred to in section 1 shall be deemed to be

2 a reference to the ‘‘John Minor Wisdom United States

3 Courthouse’’.

Æ
EXHIBIT 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of IZEA Holdings, Inc., a Nevada corporation (the “Company”), on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2012 , as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Edward Murphy, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)           The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)           The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





Dated: August 14, 2012





/s/ Edward MurphyEdward MurphyChief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 00-6678

ROBERT P. HOWARD,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

THOMAS R. CORCORAN; ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE

STATE OF MARYLAND,

Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Baltimore. Benson E. Legg, District Judge. (CA-97-

1467-L)

Submitted: September 29, 2000 Decided: October 18, 2000

Before WIDENER and WILKINS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Robert P. Howard, Appellant Pro Se. John Joseph Curran, Jr., Attorney General, Ann Norman Bosse, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF

MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Robert P. Howard appeals the district court’s order denying

relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 &

Supp. 2000). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s

opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a

certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See Howard v. Corcoran, No. CA-97-

1467-L (D. Md. Apr. 13, 2000). We deny Howard’s motion for preparation of transcripts at Government expense. We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 12-A

                        Delmarva Power & Light Company

                      Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges
                      ----------------------------------
                            (Dollars in Thousands)
                            ----------------------

<TABLE> 
<CAPTION> 

                                             1997         1996         1995         1994         1993
                                         ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------
<S>                                      <C>          <C>          <C>          <C>          <C> 
Net income                                $105,709      $116,187     $117,488     $108,310     $111,076
                                         ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------

Income taxes                                72,155        78,340       75,540       67,613       67,102
                                         ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------

Fixed charges:
       Interest on long-term debt
            including amortization of
            discount, premium and
            expense                         78,350        69,329       65,572       61,128       62,651
       Other interest                       12,835        12,516       10,353        9,336        9,245
       Preferred dividend require-
            ments of a subsidiary
            trust                            5,687         1,390         -            -            -
                                         ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------
            Total fixed charges             96,872        83,235       75,925       70,464       71,896
                                         ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------

Nonutility capitalized interest               (208)         (311)        (304)        (256)        (246)
                                         ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------

Earnings before income taxes
       and fixed charges                  $274,528      $277,451     $268,649     $246,131     $249,828
                                         ============ ============ ============ ============ ============

Ratio of earnings to fixed charges            2.83          3.33         3.54         3.49         3.47

</TABLE> 

For purposes of computing the ratio, earnings are net income plus income taxes
and fixed charges, less nonutility capitalized interest. Fixed charges consist
of interest on long- and short-term debt, amortization of debt discount,
premium, and expense, dividends on preferred securities of a subsidiary trust,
plus the interest factor associated with the Company's major leases, and
one-third of the remaining annual rentals.
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT
RYAN S. POPE, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D17-3358 ) STATE OF FLORIDA, ) ) Appellee. ) ___________________________________) Opinion filed April 27, 2018. Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Polk County; Neil A. Roddenberry, Judge. Ryan S. Pope, pro se.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. LaROSE, C.J., and MORRIS and SALARIO, JJ., Concur.
#### MID-CITY NURSERY, INC. v. PAPS FOOD CENTER, INC.

No. 4873.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Fourth Circuit.

Feb. 23, 1972.

Benjamin Washastrom, New Orleans, for plaintiff-appellant.

Shelby H. Moore, Jr., New Orleans, for defendant-appellee.

Before REDMANN, GULOTTA and BOUTALL, JJ.

REDMANN, Judge.

Plaintiff appeals from the rejection on the merits of its claim for a balance due under a contract for potted chrysanthemums.

Defendant’s evidence supports the conclusion that the last delivery of flowers was rejected because the flowers were not yet in bloom and were therefore unsaleable for the traditional New Orleans chrysanthemum day, November 1st. Plaintiff’s evidence would support a contradictory conclusion that defendant rejected the last shipment of flowers not because they were not in bloom but because defendant ordered more than it was able to sell (although defendant argues their unopened state impeded sales).

The burden of proof is plaintiff’s. The trial judge evidently found plaintiff’s *406version of the facts not proven. We are unable, from this record, to say he erred in rejecting plaintiff’s claim.

The judgment is affirmed.
<PAGE>
                                                                EXHIBIT 23.1

INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

     We consent to the use in this Amendment No. 2 to the Registration
Statement No. 333-40500 of Elastic Networks Inc. of our report dated June 16,
2000 (August 4, 2000 as to Note 15 and August 25 as to Note 17 (which
expresses an unqualified opinion and includes an explanatory paragraph
relating to the restatement described in Note 17)), appearing in the
Prospectus, which is part of such Registration Statement, and to the
reference to us under the headings "Selected Historical Financial
Information" and "Experts" in such Prospectus.

/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP


Atlanta, Georgia
August 29, 2000
#59.6

Written statements distributed at workshop:

Harry Misuriello, Director of Buildings and Utility Program Alliance to Save Energy (see Docket #50)

David C. Kalensky, Manager Codes and Standards, Gas Technology Institute (see Docket #51)

David B. Goldstein, Ph.D., Natural Resources Defense Council (see Docket #52)

Steven Nadel, Executive Director, Harvey Sachs, Buildings Program Director, American Council for an

Energy-Efficient Economy (see Docket #53)

James A. Ranfone, Managing Director, American Gas Association (see Docket #54)

Isaac Elnecave, Energy Efficiency Standards Project Manager, Northeast Energy Efficiency Partnerships,

Inc.(see Docket #55)

EE-RM/STD-01-350 COMMENT 59.6