alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.1 / 32.2  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002   In connection with the Quarterly Report of New Media Insight Group, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended October 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, David Carpenter, Principal Executive and Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that;  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.  /s/ David Carpenter Name:  David Carpenter Title:    Principal Executive and Financial Officer Date:    December 9, 2010
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

August 6, 2015

No. 04-14-00263-CV

In the Interest of H.O., a Child,

From the 408th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2012-EM5-01553

Honorable Karen H. Pozza, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

Sitting: Karen Angelini, Justice

Marialyn Barnard, Justice

Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

The panel has considered appellant’s motion for rehearing, and the motion is DENIED.

_________________________________

Karen Angelini, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 6th day of August, 2015.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-29-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             MAR-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-28-1998
<CASH>                                           8,438
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 8,438
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   8,438
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           27,385
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          1
<COMMON>                                            23
<OTHER-SE>                                    (18,947)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     8,438
<SALES>                                         16,475
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                16,475
<CGS>                                           14,952
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   14,952
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 9,051
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 916
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (9,967)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (9,967)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (9,967)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.42)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.42)
        

</TABLE>
U.S. flag
              An official website of the United States government Skip to main content   end of header Census.gov Newsroom Releases Population
 Newsroom Archive
 Skip left menu navigation
 About the Newsroom
 				Facts for Features
 				**News Releases**
 				Press Kits
 				Tip Sheets
 Release Information CB12-TPS.14 **Contact:**  Public Information Office
301-763-3030
 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:  TUESDAY, MARCH 27, 2012 Evaluation Estimates of the Population for the United States, States and Counties: April 1, 2000, to July 1, 2010 Internet tables and downloadable files contain vintage 2010 estimates of total population, births, deaths, migration and demographic characteristics including age, sex, race and Hispanic origin. The estimates were produced with an administrative records method that incorporates special censuses and local challenges. Additional tables and a downloadable file contain alternative estimates produced with the same method but do not incorporate special censuses and local challenges. All estimates are based on the 2000 Census and were created without knowledge of the 2010 Census results. The evaluation estimates are available on the population estimates Web page Internet address: <https://www.census.gov/popest/research/eval-estimates/eval-est.html> **No news release associated with this report. Tip Sheet only.**
  CONNECT WITH US

Information Quality
                    Data Linkage Infrastructure
                    Data Protection and Privacy Policy
                    Accessibility      
                    FOIA
                    Inspector General
                    No FEAR Act
                    U.S. Department of Commerce
                    USA.gov
                   Measuring America's People, Places, and Economy
#### Katie L. GRISSOM, Petitioner, v. B & B GROCERY et al., Respondents.

No. 43743.

Supreme Court of Florida.

July 12, 1973.

Certiorari denied,

CARLTON, C. J., and ROBERTS, ERVIN, ADKINS and BOYD, JJ., concur.
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2027 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

113th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2027

   To authorize an additional district judgeship for the district of 
                                 Idaho.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           February 12, 2014

 Mr. Crapo (for himself and Mr. Risch) introduced the following bill; 
  which was read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To authorize an additional district judgeship for the district of 
                                 Idaho.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DISTRICT JUDGESHIP FOR THE DISTRICT OF IDAHO.

    (a) In General.--The President shall appoint, by and with the 
advice and consent of the Senate, 1 additional district judge for the 
district of Idaho.
    (b) Technical and Conforming Amendment.--The table in section 
133(a) of title 28, United States Code, is amended by striking the item 
relating to Idaho and inserting the following:

``Idaho....................................................         3''.
 

                                 <all>
```
# C_2014060EN.01000201.xml

| 1.3.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 60/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.3.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 60/2

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

28 February 2014

2014/C 60/02

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,3813 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 140,63 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4625 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,82625 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 8,8525 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,2153 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,2750 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 27,344 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 310,45 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,1676 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,5018 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 3,0555 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,5414 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,5357 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 10,7172 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,6400 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,7487 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 473,27 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 14,7584 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 8,4882 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,6493 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 16 038,85 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,5265 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 61,674 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 49,9431 |
| THB | Thai baht | 45,068 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 3,2120 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 18,3091 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 85,3056 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,3813

JPY

Japanese yen

140,63

DKK

Danish krone

7,4625

GBP

Pound sterling

0,82625

SEK

Swedish krona

8,8525

CHF

Swiss franc

1,2153

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,2750

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

27,344

HUF

Hungarian forint

310,45

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

PLN

Polish zloty

4,1676

RON

Romanian leu

4,5018

TRY

Turkish lira

3,0555

AUD

Australian dollar

1,5414

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,5357

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

10,7172

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,6400

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,7487

KRW

South Korean won

1 473,27

ZAR

South African rand

14,7584

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

8,4882

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,6493

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

16 038,85

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,5265

PHP

Philippine peso

61,674

RUB

Russian rouble

49,9431

THB

Thai baht

45,068

BRL

Brazilian real

3,2120

MXN

Mexican peso

18,3091

INR

Indian rupee

85,3056

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
#### Gaiel Elsworth HURRELL, Appellant, v. Arthur Lewis UTTER and W. R. Grace and Company, Inc., a foreign corporation doing business in the State of Florida, Appellees.

No. 66-953.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Third District.

Nov. 21, 1967.

Claude L. Eichel, Miami, for appellant.

Weinstein & Weissenborn, Miami, for appellees.

Before PEARSON, BARKDULL and SWANN, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed on the authority of Foremost Dairies, Inc., of the South v. Godwin, 1946, 158 Fla. 245, 26 So.2d 773; Miller v. James, Fla.App.1966, 187 So.2d 901.
* This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the doctrines

of law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. The court generally

disfavors the citation of orders and judgments; nevertheless, an order and

judgment may be cited under the terms and conditions of 10th Cir. R. 36.3.

F I L E D

United States Court of Appeals

Tenth Circuit

JUL 22 1998

PATRICK FISHER

Clerk

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

TENTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee, No. 97-4132

v. (District of Utah)

ROBERT ARCE RAMIREZ,

also known as CALIMAN

HERNANDEZ, also known as

ROBERTO MENDEZ-GOMEZ

Defendant - Appellant.

(D.C. No. 96-CR-277-01) 

ORDER AND JUDGMENT*

Before PORFILIO, KELLY, and HENRY, Circuit Judges.

Roberto Arce Ramirez pleaded guilty to distributing methamphetamine in

violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1) and 18 U.S.C. § 2. The district court sentenced

him to 151 months’ imprisonment, and he now appeals, arguing that his sentence

is too lengthy. After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has

determined unanimously that oral argument would not assist the determination of
2

this appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a); 10th Cir. R. 34.1.9. We exercise

jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and order the case submitted without oral

argument.

The indictment to which Mr. Ramirez pleaded guilty charged him with

distributing more than 100 grams of a mixture or substance containing detectable

amounts of methamphetamine. The presentence investigation determined that

Mr. Ramirez had distributed at least 2.28 kilograms of methamphetamine. After

assessing a two-level increase in the offense level for possession of a firearm

and a three-level reduction for acceptance of responsibility, the district court

arrived at an offense level of thirty-one. The court reduced Mr. Ramirez’s

criminal history category from V to IV after Mr. Ramirez’s attorney successfully

argued that one of his prior convictions had been double-counted. The resulting

range of sentences under the United States Sentencing Guidelines was 151 to 188

months.

In this appeal, Mr. Ramirez’s attorney has filed a brief pursuant to Anders

v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). She has also filed a motion to withdraw. 

According to his attorney, Mr. Ramirez contends that a term of 151 months’

imprisonment is too long for the kind of offense that he has committed. 

However, his attorney states that there are no meritorious legal grounds for this

argument.
3

We agree with Mr. Ramirez’s attorney. Mr. Ramirez was sentenced at the

low end of the Guideline range, and there is no indication that the district court

erred in applying the Guidelines. A defendant may not appeal a sentence solely

on the grounds that it is too harsh. See United States v. Garcia, 919 F.2d 1478,

1482 (10th Cir. 1990) (dismissing appeal of sentence within proper guideline

range for lack of jurisdiction). We therefore grant Mr. Ramirez’s attorney’s

motion to withdraw and dismiss this appeal for lack of jurisdiction.

 The mandate shall issue forthwith.

 Entered for the Court,

Robert H. Henry

Circuit Judge
Exhibit 31.4

Certification of Principal Financial Officer

I, Paul W. Hoelscher, certify that:



| | 1. | I have reviewed this Amendment No. 2 to the quarterly report on Form 10-Q/A of Horizon Pharma plc; and
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------





|                                                  |  | 
|------------------------------------------------- |  | 
|Date: May 26, 2017                                |  | 
|                                                  | 
|/s/ Paul W. Hoelscher                             |  | 
|Paul W. Hoelscher                                 |  | 
|Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer |  | 
|(Principal Financial Officer)                     |  |
#### STATE of Florida ex rel. Donald GAVAGNI, Relator, v. Honorable Alfonso SEPE, Judge of the Circuit Court of the 11th Judicial Circuit of Florida, Criminal Division, and all other judges of the Circuit Court, Criminal Division, Respondents.

No. 73-125.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Jan. 29, 1973.

PER CURIAM.

Prohibition dismissed.
EXHIBIT 31.1

                  CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                         THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Ron Schutte, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Brooklyn Cheesecake &
Desserts Company, Inc;

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the
registrant and I have:

      a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to me by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

      b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing of this quarterly
report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

      c) Presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation
as of the Evaluation Date;

5. I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's
auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or
persons performing the equivalent function):

      a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the
registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

      b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and

6. I have indicated in this quarterly report whether or not there were
significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could
significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent
evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant
deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Date: November 21, 2005

/s/ Ron Schutte
------------------------------------
Ron Schutte
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
# C_2014088EN.01000901.xml

| 27.3.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 88/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.3.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 88/9

---

NOTICE OF OPEN COMPETITION

NOTICE OF OPEN COMPETITION

2014/C 88/06

The European Personnel Selection Office (EPSO) is organising open competition:

EPSO/AD/278/14 — Administrators (AD 7) in the following fields:

| 1. | Digital forensics |
| --- | --- |

1.

Digital forensics

| 2. | Operational analysis |
| --- | --- |

2.

Operational analysis

The competition notice is published in 24 languages in Official Journal C 88 A of 27 March 2014.

Further information can be found on the EPSO website: http://blogs.ec.europa.eu/eu-careers.info/

---
1 The Honorable Susan Webber Wright, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas, adopting the report and recommendations of the Honorable H. David Young, United States Ma gistrate Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas. 

## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 06-2759

___________ Charles Whited, * * Appellant, * * Appeal for the United States v. * District Court for the Eastern * District of Arkansas. Keith Waddle, Major, Disciplinary * [UNPUBLISHED] Hearing Officer, Cummins Unit, ADC; * R. Gaylon Lay, Warden, Cummins * Unit, ADC; James Gibson, Hearing * Officer Administrator, Arkansas * Department of Correction, * * Appellees. *

___________ Submitted: April 25, 2007 Filed: May 3, 2007

___________ Before WOLLMAN, MURPHY, and BYE, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Arkansas prisoner Charles Whited appeals the district court’s 1 preservice dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint, in which he alleged that prison officials-2- violated his due process rights by wrongly confining him to punitive isolation for fifteen days after he failed to report to work on the hoe squad. Upon de novo review,
see Cooper v. Schriro , 189 F.3d 781, 783 (8th Cir. 1999) (per curiam), we agree with the district court that Whited failed to state a due process claim related to his disciplinary sanction. See Sandin v. Conner , 515 U.S. 472, 483-86 (1995) (finding 30 days in disciplinary segregation did not work “major disruption” in inmate’s environment because it did not exceed sim ilar confinement in either duration or degree of restriction); cf. Wilkinson v. Austin , 545 U.S. 209, 213, 223-24 (2005) (finding atypical and significant hardship at supermax prison where, in addition to conditions similar to most in solitary confin ement, placement is indefinite, is reviewed only annually after initial 30-day review, and disqualifies otherwise eligible inmate for parole consideration). Moreover, any due process vi olations committed during the disciplinary hearing were cured by the s ubsequent reversal of the disciplinary conviction. See Wycoff v. Nichols , 94 F.3d 1187, 1189 (8th Ci r. 1996) (reversal of disciplinary case against prisoner constitute d part of due process prisoner received, and it cured alleged due process violation based on initial decision to sanction prisoner).
The judgment is affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

______________________________
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2947 Engrossed Amendment Senate (EAS)]

103d CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 2947

_______________________________________________________________________

                               AMENDMENTS
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  

                  In the Senate of the United States,

                            April 12 (legislative day, April 11), 1994.
      Resolved, That the bill from the House of Representatives (H.R. 
2947) entitled ``An Act to amend the Commemorative Works Act, and for 
other purposes'' do pass with the following

                              AMENDMENTS:

 (1)Page 6, line 1, after ``Administrator'' insert: (as appropriate)

 (2)Page 6, line 3, after ``the'' insert: Secretary or Administrator 
determines the fundraising efforts with respect to the commemorative 
work have misrepresented an affiliation with the commemorative work or 
the United States.

 (3)Page 6, strike out lines 4 to 13.

 (4)Page 6, lines 15 and 16, strike out [operations prepared] and 
insert: operations, including financial statements audited

 (5)Page 6, line 18, strike out [work.] and insert: work.''.

 (6)Page 6, strike out lines 19 to 25.

 (7)Page 7, line 6, strike out [(1) Section] and insert: Section

 (8)Page 7, strike out lines 12 to 16.

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
```