alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                5
<LEGEND>
     THIS SCHEDULE  CONTAINS SUMMARY  FINANCIAL  INFORMATION  EXTRACTED FROM THE
     FY97  CONSOLIDATED  BALANCE SHEET AND CONSOLIDATED  STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS
     AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                 1,000
       
<S>                                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                           YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                       SEP-27-1997
<PERIOD-END>                            SEP-27-1997
<CASH>                                          216,814
<SECURITIES>                                    151,455
<RECEIVABLES>                                   312,963 
<ALLOWANCES>                                     16,588
<INVENTORY>                                     166,008
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                858,236
<PP&E>                                          657,351
<DEPRECIATION>                                  476,941
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                1,134,868  
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           391,822
<BONDS>                                         212,750
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                 0
<PREFERRED>                                           0
<COMMON>                                        607,130 
<OTHER-SE>                                      (88,350)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  1,134,868
<SALES>                                       1,142,561
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                              1,533,169
<CGS>                                           772,721
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                 1,021,569 
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                448,427
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                      0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               15,422 
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  58,300
<INCOME-TAX>                                      2,400
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              55,900  
<DISCONTINUED>                                        0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                       0
<CHANGES>                                             0
<NET-INCOME>                                     55,900
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      1.26
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      1.27

        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Veritas DGC Inc.
(the "Company") for the year ended July 31, 2002 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Form 10-K"), I, Matthew D.
Fitzgerald, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

                  1. The Form 10-K fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

                  2. The information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the Company.

October 7, 2002

                                             /s/ Matthew D. Fitzgerald
                                             -----------------------------------
                                             Matthew D. Fitzgerald
                                             Chief Financial Officer
# C_2014297EN.01001201.xml

| 4.9.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 297/12 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.9.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 297/12

---

Notice of the expiry of certain anti-dumping measures

(2014/C 297/03)

Further to the publication of a notice of impending expiry (1) following which no duly substantiated request for a review was lodged, the Commission gives notice that the anti-dumping measure mentioned below will shortly expire.

1

This notice is published in accordance with Article 11(2) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009 of 30 November 2009 (2) on protection against dumped imports from countries not members of the European Community.

2

| Product | Country(ies) of origin or exportation | Measures | Reference | Date of expiry (3) |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Tube and pipe fittings of iron or steel | Thailand | Anti-dumping duty | Council Regulation (EC) No 803/2009 (OJ L 233, 4.9.2009, p. 1) in so far as it concerns Thailand | 5.9.2014 |

Product

Country(ies) of origin or exportation

Measures

Reference

Date of expiry (3)

3

Tube and pipe fittings of iron or steel

Thailand

Anti-dumping duty

Council Regulation (EC) No 803/2009 (OJ L 233, 4.9.2009, p. 1) in so far as it concerns Thailand

5.9.2014

---

(1)  OJ C 366, 14.12.2013, p. 35.

1

(2)  OJ L 343, 22.12.2009, p. 51.

2

(3)  The measure expires at midnight of the day mentioned in this column.

3

---
Exhibit



EXHIBIT 10.11



FOURTH AMENDMENT TO ASSET PURCHASE AGREEMENT
THIS FOURTH AMENDMENT TO ASSET PURCHASE AGREEMENT (this “Amendment”) is entered into as of October 17, 2016 by and between CEDAR CREST, LLC, a Louisiana limited liability company (“Seller”), and SENIORS INVESTMENTS II, LLC a Delaware limited liability company (“Buyer”).  
WHEREAS, Seller and Buyer previously entered into that certain Asset Purchase Agreement (the “Original Agreement”, and as amended from time to time, the “Agreement”) dated as of March 31, 2016 with respect to certain premises commonly known as “Cedar Crest Personal Memory Living” located in the City of Lafayette, Louisiana, more particularly described on Schedule 3.1(a) to the Agreement.  
WHEREAS, the parties desire to make certain modifications to the Agreement as are more particularly described herein.
NOW, THEREFORE, for good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto hereby agree as follows:  
1.    Defined Terms.  All capitalized terms used and not defined herein shall have the meanings given to them in the Agreement.   
2.    Extension of the Study Period.  The definition of “Study Period” (as defined in Section 12.1 of the Agreement) shall be amended in its entirety to mean “the period beginning on the Effective Date and ending at 11:59 PM PST on November 11, 2016” such that the Study Period shall expire at 11:59 PM PST on November 11, 2016.  All references in the Agreement to the “expiration of the Study Period” shall be deemed to occur at 11:59 PM PST on November 11, 2016.
3.    Closing Date.  Clause (A) of the third sentence of Section 5.1 of the Agreement is hereby deleted and replaced in its entirety with the following: “on November 30, 2016”.
4.    Other Portfolio Closing Condition.  Section 13.1(s) of the Agreement is hereby deleted in its entirety.
5.    Except as expressly modified hereby, the Agreement is hereby ratified and shall remain in full force and effect, enforceable in accordance with its terms.”
6.    This Amendment may be executed in multiple counterparts, which taken together shall constitute one and the same instrument, and executed counterparts may be delivered via facsimile or e-mail, the parties agreeing to be bound by such delivery.  
7.    In the event of any inconsistency between this Amendment and the Agreement, the terms of this Amendment shall govern.


	
			
	 
	1
	 

	 












This Amendment has been executed as of the date and year first above written.


BUYER:
	
			
	Seniors Investments II, LLC

	a Delaware limited liability company

	 
	 
	 

	By:
	/s/ Carl Mittendorff

	Name:
	Carl Mittendorff

	Title:
	Sole Member






SELLER:
	
			
	Cedar Crest, LLC

	a Louisiana limited liability company

	 
	 
	 

	By:
	/s/ Maurice Hannie

	Name:
	Maurice Hannie

	Title:
	Managing Member






	
			
	 
	S-1
P.1 

OAR Box 1830 

Prepped by Ollie Stewart 

Document Number: 

20) IV-B-16 

Docket Number: 

A-87-11 

Printed 11/13/2008 7:20:52 AM Sheet 20 of 232 
P.2 

^

t0S % 

ft-97-n 

3Z -B-'f* 

UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 

ANN ARBOR. MICHIGAN 48105 

JAN 5 !9& 

MEMORANDUM 

V 

tf* 

OFFICE OF 

AIR AND RADIATION 

\ # 

c; 

SUBJECT: Fuel Tank Slosh Tests Done on EPA Prototype and 

Stock Rollover/Vent Valves 

FROM: Jean M. Schwendeman, Mechanical Engineer

 V W ^ "] / -sTu^^M^^^ 

Standards Development and Support Branch (j 

TO: Public Dockets A-87-11* and A-85-21 

THRU: John F. Anderson, Senior Project Manager 

Standards Development and Support Branch j 

I 

EPA has performed slosh tests on the rollover/vent valve 

used on the onboard refueling control "simple system" design. 

These tests were part of the effort to evaluate the in-use 

leakage 'protection of the valve. There is no official 

requirement that slosh tests be performed on fuel tank rollover 

valves. However, because GT Products, the manufacturer of 

EPA's simple system valve, performs these tests on the stock 

valves which they currently manufacture, EPA decided to test 

the simple system valve this way also. For comparison 

purposes^ EPA also tested current stock valves manufactured by 

GT Products and Stant. 

EPA performed the tests using the same equipment and 

method that GT uses to test current production valves. The 

equipment consists of a rectangular "slosh tank" which holds 

approximately 10 gallons of Stoddard solvent. The test valve 

is mounted on the top towards one end of the tank. The tank is 

placed o'n rods and rolled back and forth over approximately 

three feet of distance in about one to two seconds. A window 

is located on the side of the tank so that the wave motion of 

the solvent and its contact with the valve can be observed. A 

piece of tubing is connected to the valve opening so that any 

leakage can be collected in a beaker and measured. 

The: results of the tests showed that each valve had 

excellent leakage control during sloshing. None of the valves 

leaked any measurable quantity of fuel over the 30 second test 

period. Based upon these tests, it appears that the EPA simple 

system valve provides as much control against leakage during 

sloshing of the fuel tank as do stock GT and Stant valves.
EXHIBIT 31.1


                  CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                         THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


I, Ron Schutte, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this  quarterly  report on Form 10-QSB of Creative  Bakeries,
Inc;

2. Based on my  knowledge,  this  quarterly  report  does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact  necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the  circumstances  under which such statements
were made,  not  misleading  with  respect to the period  covered by this annual
report;

3.  Based  on my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and  other  financial
information  included in this quarterly report,  fairly presents in all material
respects the financial  condition,  results of operations  and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4. I am responsible for  establishing  and maintaining  disclosure  controls and
procedures  (as  defined  in  Exchange  Act Rules  13a-14  and  15d-14)  for the
registrant  and I have:

      a)  designed  such  disclosure  controls  and  procedures  to ensure  that
material  information  relating to the  registrant,  including its  consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to me by others within those entities,  particularly
during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

      b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures  as of a date  within 90 days prior to the  filing of this  quarterly
report (the "Evaluation Date"); and


      c)  presented  in  this  quarterly   report  our  conclusions   about  the
effectiveness of the disclosure  controls and procedures based on our evaluation
as of the Evaluation Date;


5. I have disclosed,  based on our most recent  evaluation,  to the registrant's
auditors and the audit  committee  of the  registrant's  board of directors  (or
persons performing the equivalent function):


      a) all  significant  deficiencies  in the design or  operation of internal
controls  which  could  adversely  affect  the  registrant's  ability to record,
process,  summarize  and  report  financial  data  and have  identified  for the
registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and


      b) any fraud,  whether or not material,  that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and


6. I have  indicated  in  this  quarterly  report  whether  or  not  there  were
significant  changes  in  internal  controls  or in  other  factors  that  could
significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent
evaluation,   including  any  corrective  actions  with  regard  to  significant
deficiencies and material weaknesses.



Date: May 24, 2004


/s/ Ron Schutte
------------------------------------
Ron Schutte
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
#### In the Interest of D. E. B., a Minor.

No. 67-124.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Third District.

Feb. 15, 1967.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF SYSTEMS COMMUNICATIONS, INC. FOR THE FISCAL PERIOD
ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  172,868
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               320,202
<PP&E>                                         132,982
<DEPRECIATION>                                (76,960)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 381,206
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        4,103,314
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                    109,764
<COMMON>                                        36,862
<OTHER-SE>                                 (4,542,858)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   381,206
<SALES>                                        123,300
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               123,300
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  981,448
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               508,725
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             172,206
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (520,737)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   225,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (295,737)
<DISCONTINUED>                                189,547
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                177,688
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    71,498
<EPS-BASIC>                                      .00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .00


</TABLE>
Exhibit 99.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of North American Scientific, Inc. ("Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending
July 31, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, L. Michael Cutrer, President and Chief Executive Officer, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:



|    |                                                                            
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
|By: | /s/L. MICHAEL CUTRERL. Michael Cutrer President
and Chief Executive Officer

---

QuickLinks
#### Norman R. SNYDER, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

No. 7272.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Second District.

March 1, 1967.

Rehearing Denied April 3, 1967.

*218See also, Fla.App., 180 So.2d 359.

A. Lamar Matthews, Jr., of Dye, Dye, Smith & Cleary, Bradenton, for petitioner.

Earl Faircloth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Robert R. Crittenden, Asst. Atty. Gen., Lakeland, for respondent.

SHANNON, Judge.

Petitioner has filed this petition for writ of certiorari seeking review of a decision of the Circuit Court for Manatee County.

Petitioner was tried in the county court in Manatee County on an information-charging him with the crime of passing worthless checks under Fla.Stat., Sec. 832.05, F.S.A. The jury found petitioner guilty and he was sentenced to a term of 90' days in the county jail.

The first question for our determination is whether this court has jurisdiction. The petitioner was tried in the county court for a violation, of Fla.Stat., Sec. 832.05, F.S.A. Under the Florida Constitution, .Art. V, Sec. 6, F.S.A., a circuit court has appellate jurisdiction in all civil and criminal cases arising in the county court, or before county judges’ courts, of all misdemeanors tried in criminal courts of record. A violation of Fla.Stat., Sec. 832.05, F.S.A., is designated as a misdemeanor in the statute itself, so the Circuit Court for Manatee County had appellate jurisdiction of this case. The circuit court affirmed petitioner’s conviction and he filed a petition for writ of certiorari in this court. Judgments rendered by a circuit court in the exercise of its final appellate jurisdiction may be reviewed by district courts of appeal through the procedure of certiorari. Fla.Const. Art. V, Sec. 5, Sub-sec. (3); Frazee v. Frazee, Fla.App.1966, 185 So.2d 484; Ellison v. City of Fort Lauderdale, Fla.1966, 183 So.2d 193; and Dresner v. City of Tallahassee, Fla.1964, 164 So.2d 208. Therefore, we have jurisdiction to determine whether or not the writ of certiorari should be granted.

Throughout the proceedings in the lower courts petitioner has contended that the statute under which he was convicted (Fla.Stat., Sec. 832.0J5, F.S.A.) is unconstitutional. In Ennis v. State, Fla. 1957, 95 So.2d 20, cert. denied, 355 U.S. 868, 78 S.Ct. 117, 2 L.Ed.2d 74, this statute was impliedly *219held to be constitutional by the Florida Supreme Court. The opinion contains an excellent discussion of statutes of other states which are substantially the same as Fla. Stat., Sec. 832.05, F.S.A., and which have been held to be constitutional. See Shargaa v. State, Fla.1955, 84 So.2d 42. The purpose of these statutes and the Florida statute is to penalize persons for putting into circulation certain kinds of worthless commercial paper. There seems to be no constitutional prohibition against a legislative act ■of this nature.

We have considered each of petitioner’s points on appeal and have found them without merit. Therefore, we hold that Fla. Stat., Sec. 832.05, F.S.A., is constitutional. Accordingly, the petition for writ of cer-tiorari is denied.

ALLEN, C. J., and HOBSON, J., concur.
251 La. 671

#### Howard J. de la HOUSSAYE v. STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY.

No. 48972.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Jan. 15, 1968.

In re: Howard J. de la Houssaye applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, Parish of Jefferson. 202 So.2d 287.

Writ refused. On the facts found by the Court of Appeal, there is no error of law in its judgment.

McCALEB, J., thinks that a writ should be granted.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-29-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             MAR-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-28-1998
<CASH>                                           7,048
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    2,275
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      1,930
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                11,255
<PP&E>                                             696
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  11,951
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           30,390
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          1
<COMMON>                                            23
<OTHER-SE>                                    (18,462)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    11,951
<SALES>                                         12,229
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                12,229
<CGS>                                           10,992
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   10,992
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                10,088
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 608
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (9,459)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (9,459)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (9,459)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.40)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.40)
        

</TABLE>