alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2013092EN.01000301.xml

| 28.3.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 92/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.3.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 92/3

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.6877 — Oiltanking GmbH/Gunvor Group Ltd/PT Oiltanking Karimun)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2013/C 92/02

On 18 March 2013, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32013M6877. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32013M6877. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.

---
# C_2013372EN.01000401.xml

| 19.12.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 372/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.12.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 372/4

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

18 December 2013

(2013/C 372/03)

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,3749 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 141,61 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4606 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,84010 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 8,9892 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,2211 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,3795 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 27,734 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 298,49 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,7028 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,1783 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,4723 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,8137 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,5434 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4621 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 10,6586 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,6660 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,7306 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 448,32 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 14,2257 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 8,3483 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,6360 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 16 594,88 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,4808 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 60,872 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 45,3050 |
| THB | Thai baht | 44,365 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 3,1994 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 17,8211 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 85,3840 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,3749

JPY

Japanese yen

141,61

DKK

Danish krone

7,4606

GBP

Pound sterling

0,84010

SEK

Swedish krona

8,9892

CHF

Swiss franc

1,2211

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,3795

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

27,734

HUF

Hungarian forint

298,49

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,7028

PLN

Polish zloty

4,1783

RON

Romanian leu

4,4723

TRY

Turkish lira

2,8137

AUD

Australian dollar

1,5434

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4621

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

10,6586

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,6660

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,7306

KRW

South Korean won

1 448,32

ZAR

South African rand

14,2257

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

8,3483

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,6360

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

16 594,88

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,4808

PHP

Philippine peso

60,872

RUB

Russian rouble

45,3050

THB

Thai baht

44,365

BRL

Brazilian real

3,1994

MXN

Mexican peso

17,8211

INR

Indian rupee

85,3840

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
<PAGE>

                                                                   Exhibit 23.5

                           CONSENT OF DIRECTOR NOMINEE

        The undersigned hereby consents to serve as a director of Watson
Wyatt & Company Holdings, a Delaware corporation, (the "Company") subject to
his election by the stockholders of the Company and to the inclusion of him
as a nominee for director of the Company in any proxy statement or
registration statement filed and/or distributed by or on behalf of the
Company.

Dated:  September 13, 2000

                                                     /s/  David P. Marini
                                                     -------------------------
                                                     Name:  David P. Marini
OCT Li 2022 

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL 

No. 85479 

. HA.PRC'WN 

SUPREMF: URT 

TY C.1_,Ekri 

K.EY MAYEN BURTON, 

Appellant, 

vs. 

THE STATE OF NEVADA, 

Respondent. 

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 

It I,)17A

This is a pro se notice of appeal from a district court order 

denying a postconviction petition for a writ of habeas corpus. Eighth 

Judicial District Court, Clark County; Crystal Eller, Judge. 

This court's review of this appeal reveals a jurisdictional defect. 

Specifically, the district court entered its order denying appellant's petition 

on July 18, 2022. The district court served notice of entry of that order on 

appellant on July 20, 2022. Appellant did not file the notice of appeal, 

however, until October 4, 2022, well after the expiration of the 30-day 

appeal period prescribed by NRS 34.575. See NRAP 4(b); Lozada u. State, 

110 Nev. 349, 352, 871 P.M 944, 946 (1994) (explaining that an untimely 

notice of appeal fails to vest jurisdiction in this court). Accordingly, this 

court 

ORDERS this appeal DISMISSED. 

A6.•k , J 

Hardesty 

/ekSY"A—Q

Stiglich Herndon 

2 

4414- "' 
cc: Hon. Crystal Eller, District Judge 

Key Mayen Burton 

Attorney General/Carson City 

Clark County District Attorney 

Eighth District Court Clerk 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 

tO 1.447A ,4:4-411t.;., 2
#### Patrick J. O’BRIEN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 71-1037.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Dec. 19, 1972.

Charles W. Musgrove, Public Defender, and Norman J. Kapner, Asst. Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Andrew I. Friedrich, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The defendant was charged with breaking and entering a building with intent to commit a misdemeanor, to-wit: Petty Larceny. He pleaded guilty at arraignment and the sole question presented on appeal is whether the defendant made an understanding waiver of counsel. We have examined the colloquy between the court, the prosecutor and the defendant, and from it we are able to say, without doubt on our part, that the defendant made a voluntary, intelligent and understanding waiver of counsel. Thus, no error has been made to appear in this connection and the judgment must be affirmed.

In canvassing the whole trial court procedure we notice an uncertainty or lack of clarity as concerns the sentence imposed. It arises from this exchange:

> “THE COURT: It is the judgment and sentence of the Court that you be imprisoned by confinement in the Division of Corrections for a term of six months to four years.

> How long have you been in jail ?

> “THE DEFENDANT: Since the 11th.

> “THE COURT: The 11th. That would be from six months to four years, eleven months and nineteen days.”

We feel it would be apropriate to remand this case to the trial court for clarification of sentence.

Affirmed upon the merits, and remanded for clarification of sentence.

REED, C. J., and CROSS, JJ., concur. WALDEN and
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3077 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3077

 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow tips received for 
providing food or beverages for consumption off the employer's premises 
   to be taken into account under the credit for the employer social 
                     security tax on certain tips.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 14, 1993

  Mr. Talent introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow tips received for 
providing food or beverages for consumption off the employer's premises 
   to be taken into account under the credit for the employer social 
                     security tax on certain tips.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled, That (a) paragraph (2) 
of section 45B(b) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (defining excess 
employer social security tax) is amended to read as follows:
            ``(2) Only certain tips taken into account.--In applying 
        paragraph (1), there shall be taken into account only tips 
        received from customers in connection with the provision of 
        food or beverages in circumstances where the tipping of 
        employees serving food or beverages to customers is 
        customary.''
    (b) The amendment made by subsection (a) shall apply to taxes paid 
after December 31, 1993.

                                 <all>
```
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

JUDGMENT

No. 04-16-00422-CR

Ruben ZAVALA,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the County Court at Law No. 2, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 485563

Honorable Jason Wolff, Judge Presiding

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE MARION, JUSTICE ANGELINI, AND JUSTICE RIOS

In accordance with this court’s memorandum opinion of this date, the judgment of the trial 

court is AFFIRMED.

SIGNED February 8, 2017.

_____________________________

Karen Angelini, Justice
#### STATE of Florida ex rel. William W. KEEGAN, Petitioner, v. Jack SANDSTROM, Warden, Dade County Jail, Respondent.

No. 43561.

Supreme Court of Florida.

April 16, 1973.

CARLTON, C. J., and ROBERTS, Mc-CAIN and DEKLE, JJ, concur.

ERVIN, J, dissents.

ERVIN, Justice

(dissenting) :

The sufficiency of an application for bail pending appeal is to be tested by applying the principles laid down in Young-*473hans v. State, Fla., 90 So.2d 308. See Florida Appellate Rule 6.15, 32 F.S.A. Under the facts here presented I believe the petitioner is entitled to bail pending appeal and I would, therefore, treat the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus as a Petition for Writ of Conflict Certiorari, issue the Writ and quash the decision below.
# C_2014019EN.01003502.xml

| 22.1.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 19/35 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.1.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 19/35

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.7092 — Lixil Group/Development Bank of Japan/Grohe Group)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2014/C 19/06

On 12 December 2013, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32013M7092. EUR-Lex is the online access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32013M7092. EUR-Lex is the online access to the European law.

---
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT

TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, each of the undersigned officers of Phoenix Footwear Group, Inc. (the Company), does hereby certify with respect to the annual report of the
Company on Form 10-K for the year ended January 2, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the 10-K Report), that:

(1) The 10-K Report fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) The information contained in the 10-K Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.

The undersigned have executed this Certification effective as of March 30, 2010.



/s/ Russell D. HallRussell D. HallPresident and Chief Executive Officer/s/ Dennis T. NelsonDennis T. NelsonChief Financial Officer, Secretary and Treasurer


A
signed original of this Certification required by Section 906 has been provided to Phoenix Footwear Group, Inc. and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### Leon BRUCKNER, Appellant, v. Genevieve ABRAHAM and Norma Jean Abraham, Appellees.

No. 73-1343.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Dec. 3, 1973.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed.
# C_2012382EN.01000601.xml

| 12.12.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 382/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.12.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 382/6

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.6759 — LBO France Gestion/Blue Holding Luxembourg)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2012/C 382/05

On 6 December 2012, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32012M6759. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32012M6759. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.

---
U.S. flag
              An official website of the United States government Skip to main content   end of header Census.gov Newsroom Releases Miscellaneous
 Newsroom Archive
 Skip left menu navigation
 About the Newsroom
 				Facts for Features
 				**News Releases**
 				Press Kits
 				Tip Sheets
 Release Information CB12-TPS.20 **Contact:**  Public Information Office
301-763-3030/763-3762 (fax)
 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:  THURSDAY, April 12, 2012 “America By the Numbers” on C-SPAN's “Washington Journal” Each Friday, C-SPAN's “America By the Numbers” segment features information from the federal statistical system. The program highlights the trends and allows the public to call in or email their views. On Friday April 13, Patricia Hu, Associate Administrator and Director of the Bureau of Transportation Statistics will discuss airline performance. More information is available at
 <http://www.c-span.org/Series/Washington-Journal/>. **No news release associated with this report. Tip Sheet only.**
  CONNECT WITH US

Information Quality
                    Data Linkage Infrastructure
                    Data Protection and Privacy Policy
                    Accessibility      
                    FOIA
                    Inspector General
                    No FEAR Act
                    U.S. Department of Commerce
                    USA.gov
                   Measuring America's People, Places, and Economy
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 96-1848 JOHN L. WILSON, JR.; CONSTANCE A. WILSON, Petitioners - Appellants, versus UNITED S TATES OF AMERICA; INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE, Respondents - Appellees.

No. 96-1889 JOHN L. WILSON, JR.; CONSTANCE A. WILSON, Petitioners - Appellants, versus UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE, Respondents - Appellees.Appeals from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Asheville. Lacy H. Thornburg, District Judge. (MISC-96-23-1-T) Submitted: January 9, 1997 Decided: January 16, 199723 Before HALL and MIC HAEL, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. John L. Wilson, Jr., Constance A. Wilson, Appellants Pro Se. Gary R. Allen, Charles Edward Brookhart, Alice Lizbeth Ronk, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Appellants appeal the district court's orders granting the Respondents' motion for summary enforcement of a third party summons and denying Appellants' motion for a stay of enforcement pending appeal. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinions and find no reversible error. Ac cordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Wilson v. United States , No. MISC-96-23-1-T (W.D.N.C. May 29 & June 7, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
#### Robert Lewis MOSLEY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 71-194.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Sept. 22, 1971.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
U.S. flag
              An official website of the United States government





---

close


back button
 Australia source
 Print Share
 Basic Facts Population
 People per sq. km
 Males per 100 females
 Children per woman
 Goods exported from U.S.
 Goods imported to U.S.
 Change in exports from U.S. for 2014 to 2023
 A Closer Look Source
 Comparisons
 Compared to the U.S.
 Compared to the World
 K = Thousands
                M = Millions
                B = Billions
  Merchandise Trade U.S. Trade in Manufactured Goods
 Top Exported Goods by U.S. State or Territory
 Population Current and Projected Population
 Population by Age and Sex
 Source and Notes Source: U.S. Census Bureau, International Database (demographic data) and USA Trade Online (trade data); Central Intelligence Agency, The World Fact Book (country reference maps). This application presents data for 228 countries and areas of the world with a 2024 population of 5,000 or more. For eleven of those countries and areas, only demographic data are presented. "Data not available" indicates that data are not available from this application.  In such instances, data may be available elsewhere at the census.gov website. Trade figures presented for France do not include data for overseas departments French Guiana, Guadeloupe, Martinique, Mayotte, and Reunion but do include data for dependencies Saint Barthelemy and Saint Martin.  Trade figures for the United Kingdom include data for crown dependencies Guernsey, Isle of Man, and Jersey. To learn more about world population projections, go to Notes on the World Population Clock. To learn more about international trade data, go to Guide to Foreign Trade Statistics. All trade figures are in U.S. dollars on a nominal basis.


CONNECT WITH US
 Information Quality
                    Data Linkage Infrastructure
                    Data Protection and Privacy Policy
                    Accessibility      
                    FOIA
                    Inspector General
                    No FEAR Act
                    U.S. Department of Commerce
                    USA.gov
  Measuring America's People, Places, and Economy
# C_2014371EN.01001701.xml

| 18.10.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 371/17 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.10.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 371/17

---

Notice of the impending expiry of certain anti-dumping measures

(2014/C 371/10)

1.   As provided for in Article 11(2) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009 of 30 November 2009 on protection against dumped imports from countries not members of the European Community (1), the Commission gives notice that, unless a review is initiated in accordance with the following procedure, the anti-dumping measures mentioned below will expire on the date mentioned in the table below.

1

2.   Procedure

Procedure

Union producers may lodge a written request for a review. This request must contain sufficient evidence that the expiry of the measures would be likely to result in a continuation or recurrence of dumping and injury.

Should the Commission decide to review the measures concerned, importers, exporters, representatives of the exporting country and Union producers will then be provided with the opportunity to amplify, rebut or comment on the matters set out in the review request.

3.   Time limit

Time limit

Union producers may submit a written request for a review on the above basis, to reach the European Commission, Directorate-General for Trade (Unit H-1), CHAR 4/39, 1000 Brussels, Belgium (2) at any time from the date of the publication of the present notice but no later than three months before the date mentioned in the table below.

2

4.   This notice is published in accordance with Article 11(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009.

| Product | Country(ies) of origin or exportation | Measures | Reference | Date of expiry (3) |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Silicon | The People’s Republic of China
  The Republic of Korea
  Taiwan | Anti-dumping duty | Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 467/2010 imposing definitive anti-dumping duties on imports of silicon originating in the People’s Republic of China (OJ L 131, 29.5.2010, p. 1) as extended to imports consigned from the Republic of Korea and extended to imports consigned from Taiwan by Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 311/2013 (OJ L 95, 5.4.2013, p. 1). | 30.5.2015 |

Product

Country(ies) of origin or exportation

Measures

Reference

Date of expiry (3)

3

Silicon

The People’s Republic of China

The Republic of Korea

Taiwan

Anti-dumping duty

Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 467/2010 imposing definitive anti-dumping duties on imports of silicon originating in the People’s Republic of China (OJ L 131, 29.5.2010, p. 1) as extended to imports consigned from the Republic of Korea and extended to imports consigned from Taiwan by Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 311/2013 (OJ L 95, 5.4.2013, p. 1).

30.5.2015

---

(1)  OJ L 343, 22.12.2009, p. 51.

1

(2)  Fax +32 22956505.

2

(3)  The measure expires at midnight of the day mentioned in this column.

3

---