alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 21-0485

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

CORY LEVI GOODMAN,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, 

and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including November 7, 2022, within which to prepare, 

file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

September 29 2022

09/29/2022

Case Number: DA 21-0485
[J-29-2018]

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Appellee

v.

HOWARD WILLIAM DEWEESE,

Appellant

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 69 MAP 2017

Appeal from the Order of the Superior 

Court at No. 1998 MDA 2016 dated 

5/8/17, affirming in part and vacating in 

part the PCRA order of Dauphin County 

Court of Common Pleas, Criminal 

Division, at No. CP-22-CR-0003531-2010 

dated 11/8/16 and remanding for 

resentencing

Submitted: March 2, 2018

ORDER

PER CURIAM DECIDED: June 1, 2018

AND NOW, this 1st day of June, 2018, this appeal is dismissed as having been 

improvidently granted.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> US DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                           1,512
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    9,300
<ALLOWANCES>                                       215
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                12,256
<PP&E>                                           4,618
<DEPRECIATION>                                   2,991
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  14,384
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            3,341
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            40
<OTHER-SE>                                      10,714
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    14,384
<SALES>                                         22,706
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                22,706
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   20,169
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                  (96)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,692
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,026
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,666
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,666
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.42
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.40


</TABLE>
**Exhibit 99.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION OFCHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**

**PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANTTO**

**SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connectionwith the Quarterly Report of North American Scientific, Inc. (“Company”) onForm 10-Q for the period ending January 31, 2003, as filed with the Securitiesand Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Alan I. Edrick,Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, certify pursuant to 18U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes–OxleyAct of 2002, that:

 

(1)     TheReport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange of 1934; and

 

(2)     Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 
| Date:  March 7, 2003 |                                               |
|---------------------------|----------------------------------------------------|
|                      |
| By:                       | /s/ Alan I.  Edrick                                |   |
|                      | Alan I.  Edrick                                    |
|                      | Senior Vice  President and Chief Financial Officer |
|                           |                                                    |  |  |

 

----
#### Nathaniel WHITAKER, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. J-480.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. First District.

Sept. 19, 1968.

Richard Ervin, III, Public Defender and John D. Buchanan, Jr., Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.

*99Earl Faircloth, Atty. Gen., and Raymond L. Marky, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

This cause having been orally argued before the Court, the briefs and record on appeal having been read and given full consideration, and the appellant having failed to demonstrate reversible error, the judgment of the lower court hereby appealed from is affirmed.

WIGGINTON, C. J., and CARROLL, DONALD K., and SPECTOR, JJ., concur.
<PAGE>

                                                                   Exhibit 23.2


                          CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the reference to our firm under the caption "Experts" and to
the use of our report dated March 29, 2000 (except for Notes 5 and 15, as to
which the date is April 28, 2000), with respect to the financial statements
of dELiA*s Inc. included in the Registration Statement (Form S-4 No.
333-00000) and related Joint Proxy Statement/Prospectus of iTurf Inc. for the
registration of 27,844,294 shares of its common stock.



                                       /s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP


New York, New York
August 28, 2000
Exhibit








Exhibit 10-s-1


Rockwell Collins, Inc.
Non-Employee Director Compensation Summary
As of October 1, 2016


Initial Election to Board
		
	•
	Granted restricted stock units ("RSUs") with a value equal to:


		
	◦
	$100,000 plus


		
	◦
	$120,000 multiplied by a fraction where the numerator is the number of days until the next Annual Meeting of Shareowners and the denominator is 365.




Annual Retainer 
		
	•
	$100,000 payable in equal quarterly installments at the beginning of each quarter.




Annual Equity Grant
		
	•
	At each Annual Meeting of Shareowners, granted RSUs with a value of $120,000.




Annual Lead Independent Director Fees
		
	•
	Additional cash retainer of $30,000, payable in equal quarterly installments at the beginning of each quarter.




Annual Committee Chair Fees
		
	•
	Audit - $25,000


		
	•
	Compensation - $20,000


		
	•
	Technology and Cybersecurity - $20,000


		
	•
	Nominating and Governance - $15,000


		
	•
	Corporate Strategy and Finance - $15,000


		
	•
	All chair fees are payable in equal quarterly installments at the beginning of each quarter.




Annual Audit Committee Fees
		
	•
	Each Audit Committee member, other than the Chair, receives $10,000, payable in equal quarterly installments at the beginning of each quarter.




Annual Deferral Opportunity
		
	•
	Prior to the start of each calendar year, a non-employee director may elect to defer all or a portion of his or her cash fees by electing to receive RSUs in lieu thereof.








* All annual amounts may be prorated for service periods of less than a year.
Order entered April 14, 2020

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-20-00152-CV

ALPHA OMEGA CHL, INC., Appellant

V.

MIN LAW FIRM, P.C., Appellee

On Appeal from the 160th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DC-12-07799

ORDER

As directed by this Court, appellant has provided written verification that it 

has requested and made arrangements to pay for the reporter’s record. 

Accordingly, we ORDER Gina Udall, Official Court Reporter for the 160th 

Judicial District Court, to file the reporter’s record within thirty days of the date 

of this order. 

We DIRECT the Clerk of this Court to send a copy of this order to Ms. 

Udall and all parties. 

/s/ ROBERT D. BURNS, III

CHIEF JUSTICE
<PAGE>

                                                               Exhibit 10.8.1

                                CUTCO INDUSTRIES, INC.
                                 6900 Jericho Turnpike
                                Syosset, New York 11791





                                        August 2, 1999



Mr. Marvin Marcus
45 Cardinal Drive
East Hills, New York 11576


Dear Mr. Marcus:

         Reference is hereby made to your employment agreement with CutCo
Industries, Inc. (the "Company") dated as of October 15, 1998, as amended as
of April 1, 1999 (the "Employment Agreement").

         This letter is being delivered to induce you to resign your
employment as an officer and employee of the Company. In lieu of any
severance or termination of employment payments or other compensation you may
be entitled to receive under the Employment Agreement following termination of
employment after a change of control of the Company, you agree to accept the
sum of $100,000 in full satisfaction of any such, or any other, compensation
and severance claims.

         The Company hereby reaffirm the validity of its undertakings set
forth in the Indemnity Agreement dated as of October 15, 1998 between the
Company and you, and agrees that any expenses (including reasonable fees and
disbursements of counsel selected by you) incurred by you after the date
hereof in connection with the informal inquiry commenced by the Southeast
Regional Office of the Securities and Exchange Commission regarding CutCo
Acquisition Corporation shall be promptly reimbursed by the Company.

         As of the date hereof, you shall deliver to the Company all credit
cards of the Company and consent that the Company cancel, in accordance with
applicable law, all benefits and corporate perquisites, other than the use of
a Company leased vehicle.



                                    Very truly yours,


                                    CUTCO INDUSTRIES, INC.


                                    By:  /s/ Ron Oren
                                       ------------------------
                                             Ron Oren
                                             President




AGREED TO:



----------------------------------
Marvin Marcus
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-7588

DIVETO M. ALLEN,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

DANIEL T. MAHON, Warden,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. David G. Lowe, Magistrate Judge.

(CA-96-831)

Submitted: March 12, 1998 Decided: March 31, 1998

Before LUTTIG, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Diveto M. Allen, Appellant Pro Se. Margaret Ann Bullock Walker,

Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
* Both parties consented to the jurisdiction of the magistrate

judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) (1994).

2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant seeks to appeal the magistrate judge's order denying

relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 &

Supp. 1997).* We have reviewed the record and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. Allen v. Mahon, No. CA-96-831 (E.D. Va. Nov. 4,

1997). We deny Appellant's motion for appointment of counsel. We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
# C_2013170EN.01002201.xml

| 15.6.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 170/22 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.6.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 170/22

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

14 June 2013

2013/C 170/05

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,3303 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 126,37 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4582 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,85150 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 8,6096 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,2322 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 7,6405 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 25,718 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 291,41 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,7017 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,2347 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,4588 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,4674 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,3841 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,3524 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 10,3258 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,6469 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,6638 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 498,62 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 13,2051 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 8,1558 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,4718 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 13 139,52 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,1445 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 56,895 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 42,2453 |
| THB | Thai baht | 40,681 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 2,8302 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 16,8411 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 76,5390 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,3303

JPY

Japanese yen

126,37

DKK

Danish krone

7,4582

GBP

Pound sterling

0,85150

SEK

Swedish krona

8,6096

CHF

Swiss franc

1,2322

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

7,6405

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

25,718

HUF

Hungarian forint

291,41

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,7017

PLN

Polish zloty

4,2347

RON

Romanian leu

4,4588

TRY

Turkish lira

2,4674

AUD

Australian dollar

1,3841

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,3524

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

10,3258

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,6469

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,6638

KRW

South Korean won

1 498,62

ZAR

South African rand

13,2051

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

8,1558

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,4718

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

13 139,52

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,1445

PHP

Philippine peso

56,895

RUB

Russian rouble

42,2453

THB

Thai baht

40,681

BRL

Brazilian real

2,8302

MXN

Mexican peso

16,8411

INR

Indian rupee

76,5390

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AT JULY 31, 2000 AND THE CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED JULY 31, 2000.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          OCT-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             NOV-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUL-31-2000
<CASH>                                          96,508
<SECURITIES>                                     7,293
<RECEIVABLES>                                   53,800
<ALLOWANCES>                                       874
<INVENTORY>                                     94,504
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               251,537
<PP&E>                                         426,944
<DEPRECIATION>                                 178,847
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 555,447
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          103,703
<BONDS>                                        421,006
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   (129,768)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   555,447
<SALES>                                        438,087
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               438,087
<CGS>                                          372,430
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  372,430
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                32,885
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                  (15)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              34,200
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  7,299
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              7,299
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     7,299
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
# C_2014408EN.01001001.xml

| 15.11.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 408/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.11.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 408/10

---

EUROPEAN INSTITUTE FOR GENDER EQUALITY

Publication of the final accounts for the financial year 2013

2014/C 408/10

The complete version of the final accounts may be found at the following address:

http://www.acer.europa.eu/The_agency/Organisation/Administrative_Board/Pages/Opinions.aspx

---
NO. 07-05-0005-CV

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AT AMARILLO

PANEL B

FEBRUARY 10, 2005

______________________________

IN RE NOAH DAVIS, RELATOR

_______________________________

Before JOHNSON, C.J., and QUINN and CAMPBELL, JJ.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Relator Noah Davis seeks mandamus directing respondent Kay Alexander, Court

Coordinator of the County Court at Law of an unspecified county, to file and set his motion

for hearing. 

 Relator’s Petition for Writ of Mandamus does not assert that mandamus should

issue (1) to protect this court’s jurisdiction, or (2) against a judge of or acting within the area

comprising the seventh judicial appellate district. We do not have jurisdiction to issue

mandamus directed to respondent. See TEX. CONST. art. V, § 6; TEX. GOV’T. CODE ANN.

§ 22.221(a),(b) (Vernon 1988 & Supp. 2004). 

We dismiss for want of jurisdiction. 

Phil Johnson

Chief Justice
#### Thomas F. O’ROURKE, Appellant, v. ASSOCIATES DISCOUNT CORPORATION and The First State Bank of Miami, Appellees.

No. 71-256.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Feb. 8, 1972.

Feibelman, Friedman, Britton & Stettin, Fort Lauderdale, for appellant.

Shutts *&*Bowen, William A. Ingraham, Jr., Miami, for appellees.

Before SWANN, C. J., and PEARSON and BARKDULL, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal in which an opinion of the Supreme Court of Florida has changed the law applicable at the time of the decision in the trial court.1 See First National Bank of Leesburg v. Hector Supply Company, Fla.App.1971, 236 So.2d 204; quashed Fla.1971, 254 So.2d 777. Accordingly the final judgment in garnishment is reversed. See Coleman v. American Bankers Insurance Co. of Fla., Fla.App.1969, 228 So.2d 410.

*299Reversed and remanded for further proceedings in accordance with the law set forth in First National Bank of Leesburg v. Hector Supply Company, supra.

1

. The instant appeal has been delayed by numerous stipulations to await the decision in the Supreme Court.
**Exhibit 23**

 

**Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement of Continental Materials Corporation (Company) on Form S-8 (File No. 33-23671) of our report dated April 15, 2011, on our audits of the consolidated financial statements of the Company as of January 1, 2011 and January 2, 2010, and for the years then ended, which report is included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

 

 
| /s/   **BKD, LLP**         |
|----------------------------|
|                       |
| Indianapolis, Indiana |
| April 15,   2011      |

 

----
#### SOUTH FLORIDA ELECTRIC COMPANY, Inc., a Florida corporation, et al., Appellants, v. UNITED BONDING INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellee.

No. 70-1270.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Feb. 10, 1971.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed.
EXHIBIT 31.2**CERTIFICATIONS**I, Victor F. Sellier, certify that:1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Argon ST, Inc.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this annual report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, resultsof operations, and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisannual report; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have: a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, ismade known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this report is being prepared;  b. Designed such internal control over financial reporting or caused such internalcontrol over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to providereasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and thepreparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generallyaccepted accounting principles.  c. Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this reportbased on such evaluation; and  d. Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter thathas materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions): a. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operationof internal control over financial reporting which are reasonable likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and  b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employeeswho have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.Date: December 14, 2005   /s/ Victor F. Sellier     Victor F. Sellier  Chief Financial Officer  
78
#### STATE of Florida ex rel., Samuel Herbert KIRBY, Relator, v. Louie L. WAINWRIGHT, Director, Division of Corrections of the State of Florida, Respondent.

No. 70-1053.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Nov. 10, 1970.

PER CURIAM.

Habeas Corpus denied.