alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
This
Addendum is made as of this August 29, 2016, by and between PositiveID Corp. (the “Company”) and GHS Investments,
LLC (“Investor”) to the Secured Convertible Promissory Note between the Company and Investor dated August 11, 2016,
including all schedules and exhibits thereto, as amended and modified by this Addendum (the “Note”). The Company wishes
to amend and modify the Note, all on the terms and conditions set forth in this Addendum.


 


1.
Section 1.2(a) of the Note has been revised to add the following: Notwithstanding anything set forth in the Note, the minimum
conversion price shall not be less than $.00005.


 


	 	ACCEPTED
    & ACKNOWLEDGED	 
	 	 	 
	 	Positive
    ID Corp.	 
	 	 	 	 
	 	By:	/s/
    William Caragol	 
	 	Name:	William
    Caragol	 
	 	Title:	Chief
    Executive Oficer	 
	 	 	 	 
	 	GHS
    INVESTMENTS, LLC 	 
	 	 	 	 
	 	By:	/s/
    Mark Grober	 
	 	Name:	Mark
    Grober	 
	 	Title:	Member	 




 



    	Page 1 of 1
<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT 23.1

                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS


We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statement on Form S-8 (No. 33-44805, No. 33-72504, 33-80637 and
No. 333-35338) of Trimark Holdings, Inc. of our report dated September 21,
2000 relating to the financial statements and financial statement schedule,
which appears in this Form 10-K.




PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

Century City, California
September 28, 2000
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 21.1


List of Subsidiaries


Vastera Limited, a company organized under the laws of England.


Vastera Solution Services Corporation, a Delaware corporation.
* The Honorable Charles R. Wolle, United St ates District Judge for the southern District of Iowa. 

## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 05-1988

___________ Edmund T. Biggs, * * Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the Southern * District of Iowa. Deere & Company; John Deere * Company, sued as John Deere * [UNPUBLISHED] Davenport Works; International Union, * United Automobile, Aerospace & * Agricultural Implement Workers of * America, Local 281, * * Appellees. *

___________ Submitted: April 20, 2006 Filed: May 2, 2006

___________ Before MELLOY, FAGG, and BENTON, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Edmund T. Biggs appeals the district court’s * adverse grant of summary judgment in Biggs's Employment Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) lawsuit. Having conducted de novo review, seeTorres v. UNUM Life Ins. Co. of Am. , 405-2- F.3d 670, 677 (8th Cir. 2005), we agree Biggs’s ERISA claims must fail: the issues he raises are foreclosed by a settleme nt agreement he signed in 1991. Cf. Leavitt v. Nw. Bell Tel. Co. , 921 F.2d 160, 162 (8th Cir. 1990) (private settlements of ERISA claims do not compromise policies underlying ERISA). Biggs offered no evidence in support of his claims of fraud, breach of fiduciary duty, or improper conduct involving either the settlement agreement or the calculation of his benefits. His remaining assertions are either raised for the first time on appeal or are without merit. Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. We also deny the pending motion.

______________________________
xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?


C\_2014358EN.01000501.xml


| | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 10.10.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 358/5 |

---

EU-27 ethyl alcohol balance sheet for 2013

(Established on 12 September 2014 in accordance with Article 2 of Regulation (EC) No 2336/2003 (1))

2014/C 358/06

| | | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | EU-27 ethyl alcohol balance sheet for 2013 Established on 12 September 2014 in accordance with Article 2 of Regulation (EC) No 2336/2003[(1)](#ntr1-C_2014358EN.01000501-E0001) | | | Hectolitres of pure alcohol (HLPA) |
| 1. | Initial stock | | | — |
| | | | | --- | --- | | — | Agricultural origin | | | | 14 035 597 |
| | | | | --- | --- | | — | Non-agricultural origin | | | | — |
| 2. | Production | | | — |
| | | | | --- | --- | | — | Agricultural origin | | | | 60 073 779 |
| | | | | --- | --- | | — | Non-agricultural origin | | | | — |
| 3. | Imports[(2)](#ntr2-C_2014358EN.01000501-E0002) [(3)](#ntr3-C_2014358EN.01000501-E0003) | | | 7 348 868 |
| | | | | --- | --- | | — | 0 % duty | | | | 4 381 681 |
| | | | | --- | --- | | — | Reduced duty | | | | — |
| | | | | --- | --- | | — | 100 % duty | | | | 2 967 187 |
| 4. | Total resources | | | 81 458 244 |
| 5. | Exports | | | 674 810 |
| 6. | Internal consumption | | | 64 367 834 |
| | Agricultural | Non-agricultural | Total |
| Food | 9 964 666 | | |
| Industrial | 5 850 135 | | |
| Fuel[(3)](#ntr3-C_2014358EN.01000501-E0003) | 45 455 169 | | |
| Other | 3 097 864 | | |
| | Total: | 64 367 834 | | |
| 7. | Final stock | | | — |
| | | | | --- | --- | | — | Agricultural origin | | | | 16 415 600 |
| | | | | --- | --- | | — | Non-agricultural origin | | | | — |
| | | | | |

---

[(1)](#ntc1-C_2014358EN.01000501-E0001)  Commission Regulation (EC) No 2336/2003 of 30 December 2003 introducing certain detailed rules for applying Council Regulation (EC) No 670/2003 laying down specific measures concerning the market in ethyl alcohol of agricultural origin ([OJ L 346, 31.12.2003, p. 19](http://publications.europa.eu/resource/oj/JOL_2003_346_R_TOC)).

[(2)](#ntc2-C_2014358EN.01000501-E0002)  Covers only products under codes CN 2207 10, CN 2207 20, CN 2208 90 91 and CN 2208 90 99.

[(3)](#ntc3-C_2014358EN.01000501-E0003)  Excludes 4 million HLPA under CN 3824 90 97 and 1,5 million HLPA of ETBE under CN 2909 19 10 used to produce fuel.

Sources: Communications from the Member States/Eurostat COMEXT.

---
Swanson, Brian (OST) boT- nc^T- l£3t>t> - Lg'^'=^.^ 

From: Devany, Dennis (OST) 

Sent: Tuesday, January 18, 2011 8:07 AM 

To: Swanson, Brian (OST) 

Subject: FW: Kalaupapa EAS subsidy -^^ 

CO -^5'^-'3:: 

From: valerie monson fmailtoivaleriemonson@yahoo.com] ^ ._^ 

Sent: jvionday, January 17, 2011 9:40 Pi^I J ? S^ ^ 

To: Devany, Dennis (OST) uj 

Subject: Kalaupapa EAS subsidy °~ 

CO 

Aloha Mr. DeVany, 

I am writing in support of an Essential Air Service subsidy being granted to an air carrier serving Kalaupapa, 

Hawaii. I began flying to Kalaupapa 22 years ago from my home on Maui and have many friends still living 

there and many friends whose graves I like to visit. 

As you probably know, the only way to reach Kalaupapa on the ground is by way of mule or walking down a 

steep cliff trail. Most people arrive on the small airplanes that fly in and out of Kalapuapa a few times a day. 

I would definitely visit Kalaupapa more often if fares were lower. The EAS subsidy would allow the people of 

Kalaupapa to have more flexibility in being able to travel to other islands to visit family or conduct other 

business and also allow their families and friends to visit them at Kalaupapa more often. 

I hope an EAS subsidy will be granted to an air carrier with a strong record of service in Hawaii. 

Respectfully, 

Valerie Monson 

175 Kealaloa Avenue 

Makawao, Hawaii 96768
SERVED JUNE 3, 2010 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

WASHINGTON, D.C. 

In the Matter of: 

Sky West Airlines, Inc. 

JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER 

FAA DOCKET CP: CP09NM00) 2 

FAA Case No. 2009NM060042 

Judge: Richard C. Goodwin 

STIPULATION 

All parties, by and through their respective attorneys of record, hereby stipulate and set 

forth the following briefing schedule: 

No later than June 18.2Q1Q. both parties will complete the Joint Statement of Facts. 

No later than July 2.2010. attorney for the FAA will submit the opening brief pertaining 

to sanction. 

No later than July 16,2010. attorney for Sky West will file his reply brief pertaining to 

sanction. 

No later than July 30.2010. attorney for the FAA will file a rebuttal reply brief 

If there are Requests for Oral Argument they will be filed no later than July 16.2010. 

and if granted, such arguments will be held in SaifCaRS^ity at a tiifte so Ordered by the Judge. 

DATED: MA^OSJi.Toto ^Ju^' 

ODD C. EMERSON 

Attorney for Sky West Airlines, Inc. 

DATED: ZS"/^ ^ -?*>/ / 

^ SCOTT R. MORRIS 

Attorney for FAA 
ORDER 

The Court having read and considered the foregoing Joint Stipulation, and good cause 

appearing therefore, IT IS ORDERED that the timeline specified, absent good cause show, shall 

be complied with. 

DATED: 
FAA Docket No. CP09NM0012 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

SERVICE LIST 

ORIGINAL & ONE COPY 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Wilbur Wright Building—Suite 2W1000' 

ONE COPY 

Todd C. Emerson, Respondent's Counsel 

Director, Government and Legal Affairs 

Sky West Airlines 

444 South River Road 

St. George, UT 84790 

TEL: 435-634-3530 

FAX: 435-634-3505 

Scott R. Morris, Complainant's Counsel 

Attorney, Office of the Regional Counsel 

Northwest Mountain Region, ANM-7 

Federal Aviation Administration 

1601 Lind Avenue, S.W. 

Renton, WA 98057 

TEL: 425-227-1417 

FAX: 425-227-1007 

The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin, Administrative Law Judge 

Office of Hearings, M-20 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. 

East Building Ground Floor, Room El2-320 

Washington, DC 20590 

TEL: 202-366-2139 Attorney-Advisor 

202-366-5121 Legal Assistant 

FAX: 202-366-7536 

' Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person or by expedited courier, use the following address: 

Federal Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building—Suite 

2W1000, Washington, DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430.
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 14**  **- 6545** 

GENE WAYNE HAYMOND , Petitioner

- Appellant ,
v. PAT CHAVIS , Respondent

- Appellee
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina , at Statesville
. Robert J. Conrad, Jr. , District Judge. ( 5:13

- cv - 00019

- RJC )

Submitted : August 28, 2014 Decided: September 3, 2014

Before WILKINSON, KING, and DUNCAN , Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion
. Gene Wayne Haymond, Appellant Pro Se. Mary Carla Babb, Assistant Attorney General, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Gene Wayne Haymond seeks to appeal the district

cou rt’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2012) petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C.
§ 2253(c)(1) (A) (2012) . A certificate of appealability will not issue absen t “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012)
. When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the distric t court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller

- El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336

- 38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must d emonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the petition states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack , 529 U.S. at 484

- 85. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Haymond h as not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny Haymond’s motion for a certificate of appealability, deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis, and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal3 contentions are adequ ately presented in the materials before th is court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
# CA2014073EN.01000101.xml

| 12.3.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CA 73/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.3.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CA 73/1

---

RESERVE LIST
   (1)

RESERVE LIST

1

OPEN COMPETITIONS

OPEN COMPETITIONS

EPSO/AD/250/13 — ADMINISTRATORS (AD 6)

ADMINISTRATORS

FOOD SAFETY (POLICY AND LEGISLATION)

FOOD SAFETY (POLICY AND LEGISLATION)

(2014/C 73 A/01)

| BAAYEN | ROBERT PAUL |
| --- | --- |
| BARNA | ADRIENN |
| BERLINGIERI | FRANCESCO |
| BERTEZZOLO | GIULIA |
| BRIGGS | JONATHAN WILLIAM |
| CARLUCCI | FRANCESCO FELICE |
| COGNAULT | CAROLINE |
| DI RUBBO | PASQUALE |
| DOMINGUEZ ORIVE | FRANCISCO JAVIER |
| FABRIZI | LAURA |
| FERRARA | MARIA |
| GOULAKI | OLGA |
| KAMMENOU | MARIA |
| KANTORSKA | KAJA |
| KILGALLEN | BRIAN |
| KLEMENCIC | MATJAZ |
| KOSTENZER | KLAUS |
| KROON | KAIDO |
| PAOLINO | MARIANNA |
| PEREZ ALVAREZ | LAURA |
| PERUCHO MARTINEZ | SARA |
| RADEMAKERS | ELINE |
| RÄSÄNEN | LEENA |
| ROSADO MARTIN | PEDRO |
| VANDER STAPPEN | ARIANE |
| VELIGRATLI | ELENI |
| VERNIER | LAURENT |
| VILA | GEMA |

BAAYEN

ROBERT PAUL

BARNA

ADRIENN

BERLINGIERI

FRANCESCO

BERTEZZOLO

GIULIA

BRIGGS

JONATHAN WILLIAM

CARLUCCI

FRANCESCO FELICE

COGNAULT

CAROLINE

DI RUBBO

PASQUALE

DOMINGUEZ ORIVE

FRANCISCO JAVIER

FABRIZI

LAURA

FERRARA

MARIA

GOULAKI

OLGA

KAMMENOU

MARIA

KANTORSKA

KAJA

KILGALLEN

BRIAN

KLEMENCIC

MATJAZ

KOSTENZER

KLAUS

KROON

KAIDO

PAOLINO

MARIANNA

PEREZ ALVAREZ

LAURA

PERUCHO MARTINEZ

SARA

RADEMAKERS

ELINE

RÄSÄNEN

LEENA

ROSADO MARTIN

PEDRO

VANDER STAPPEN

ARIANE

VELIGRATLI

ELENI

VERNIER

LAURENT

VILA

GEMA

The reserve list will be valid until 11 February 2017.

11 February 2017

---

(1)  A successful candidate may explicitly request her/his name not be published.

1

---
# C_2014061EN.01000101.xml

| 1.3.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 61/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.3.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 61/1

---

2014/C 61/01

Last publication of the Court of Justice of the European Union in the Official Journal of the European Union

Official Journal of the European Union

OJ C 52, 22.2.2014

OJ C 52, 22.2.2014

Past publications

Past publications

OJ C 45, 15.2.2014

OJ C 39, 8.2.2014

OJ C 31, 1.2.2014

OJ C 24, 25.1.2014

OJ C 15, 18.1.2014

OJ C 9, 11.1.2014

These texts are available on:

EUR-Lex: http://eur-lex.europa.eu

---
EXHIBIT 10.70

August 17, 1998

Mr. William L. Stephan

Dear Bill:

In the event that you would be involuntarily terminated
from the Company for any reason other than cause,
("Cause" being defined as illegal activity, gross
negligence, or gross violation of company policy) Datron
Systems Incorporated agrees to pay you twelve months of
severance pay through salary continuance at your then
current rate of pay, exclusive of any incentive or bonus
payments except as may be defined in applicable bonus or
incentive plans in effect at the date of termination.

During your severance period, Datron Systems
Incorporated will continue to provide your medical,
dental, vision, and all life insurance policies in the
manner in which you enjoyed these benefits during
employment.  After the severance period has passed, you
will be eligible to participate in these benefits under
COBRA provisions.

If within the twelve-month period immediately following
your involuntary  termination, you engage in activities
directly competing with Datron Systems Incorporated,
severance benefits described above will cease.

Very truly yours,

/s/D. A. DERBY
Chairman, President and
Chief Executive Officer
Not for P ubl ication in West's Fe deral Report er



# U nit edSta tes C ou rt of App eal s

For t h e Firs t C ircu it

No. 08-1461 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellee,
v. MITCHELL MCGUIRE, Defendant, Appellant.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF MAINE [Hon. George Z. Singal, U.S. District Judge]
Before Lipez, Selya and Howard, Circuit Judges.
Mitchell McGuire on brief pro se. Renée M. Bunker, Assistant U.S. Attorney, and Paula D. Silsby, United States Attorney, on brief for appellee.

January 14, 2009Amendment 706, effective November 1, 2007, reduced the base 1 offense levels for crack offenses by two levels. Amendment 713, effective March 3, 2008, made amendment 706 retroactive. -2- Per Curiam . This is defendant Mitchell McGuire's pro se appeal from the district court's denial o f a sentence reduction under 18 U.S.C. § 3582 and the recently amended crack guidelines. 1 The only argument that defendant makes on appeal is that the district court denied him due process by treating his motion for appointment of counsel as a motion for a sentence reduction and denying it as such.

We need not consider the merits of that due-process argument because any error i n denying a reduction without first giving defendant an opportunity to be heard was harmless; it is clear that the reduction would have been correctly denied in any event. United States v. Ganun, 547 F.3d 46, 47 (1st Cir. 2008) (per curiam). As recognized by the district court, defendant was statutorily ineligible for a sentence reduction under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) because his guideline range was based on the career offe n d e r guideline rather than the crack guideline and therefore was not "based on a sentencing range that has subsequently been lowered" by the recent crack cocaine amendments. United States v. Ayala-Pizarro, 2008 WL 5338459, at *1 (1st Cir. Dec. 23, 2008); United States v. Caraballo, 2008 WL 5274853, at *5 (1st Cir. Dec. 22, 2008).-3- Accordingly, the district court's order denying a sentence reduction is affirmed.
# C_2014046EN.01000201.xml

| 18.2.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 46/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.2.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 46/2

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.7062 — Rudus East/Lujabetoni/JV)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2014/C 46/03)

On 10 February 2014, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32014M7062. EUR-Lex is the online access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32014M7062. EUR-Lex is the online access to the European law.

---
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
No. 1D 21

- 3709

_____________________________ C ODY A NDREW D URNING , Appellant,

v.

S TATE O F F LORIDA , Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Clay County

. Don H. Lester , Judge

. September 29, 2022

P ER C URIAM

.
A FFIRMED

.
L EWIS , M AKAR , and B ILBREY , JJ., concur

.

_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________2 Jessica J. Yeary, Public Defender, and Lori A. Willner, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee
, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee
, for Appellee.
# C_2012314EN.01000601.xml

| 18.10.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 314/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.10.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 314/6

---

Call for proposals under the 2013 work programme ‘People’ of the seventh EC framework programme for research, technological development and demonstration activities

2012/C 314/06

Notice is hereby given of the launch of a call for proposals under the 2013 work programme ‘People’ of the seventh framework programme of the European Community for research, technological development and demonstration activities (2007 to 2013).

Proposals are invited for the following call. Call deadline and budget are given in the call text, which is published on the CORDIS website.

‘People’ specific programme:

‘People’ specific programme:

| Call title | Call identifier |
| --- | --- |
| Reintegration grants | FP7-PEOPLE-2013-CIG |

Call title

Call identifier

Reintegration grants

FP7-PEOPLE-2013-CIG

This call for proposals relates to the 2013 work programme adopted by Commission Decision C(2012) 4561 of 9 July 2012.

This call for proposals relates to the 2013 work programme adopted by Commission Decision C(2012) 4561 of 9 July 2012.

Information on the modalities of the call, the work programme, and the guide for applicants on how to submit proposals is available through the CORDIS website:

http://cordis.europa.eu/fp7/calls/

---
# C_2013273EN.01001301.xml

| 21.9.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 273/13 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.9.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 273/13

---

AVERAGE COSTS OF BENEFITS IN KIND

2013/C 273/05

AVERAGE COSTS OF BENEFITS IN KIND — 2009

The annual average costs do not take into account the reduction of 20 % provided for in Articles 94(2) and 95(2) of Council Regulation (EEC) No 574/72 (1).

1

The net monthly average costs have been reduced by 20 %.

I.   Application of Article 94 of Regulation (EEC) No 574/72

Application of Article 94 of Regulation (EEC) No 574/72

The amounts to be refunded with regard to the benefits in kind provided in 2009 to members of the family as referred to in Article 19(2) of Council Regulation (EEC) No 1408/71 (2) will be determined on the basis of the following average costs:

2

| | Annual | Net monthly |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Malta | EUR 896,55 | EUR 59,77 |

Annual

Net monthly

Malta

EUR 896,55

EUR 59,77

II.   Application of Article 95 of Regulation (EEC) No 574/72

Application of Article 95 of Regulation (EEC) No 574/72

The amounts to be refunded with regard to benefits in kind provided in 2009 under Articles 28 and 28a of Regulation (EEC) No 1408/71 will be determined on the basis of the following average costs (only per capita from 2002):

| | Annual | Net monthly |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Malta | EUR 2 056,94 | EUR 137,13 |

Annual

Net monthly

Malta

EUR 2 056,94

EUR 137,13

---

(1)  OJ L 74, 27.3.1972, p. 1.

1

(2)  OJ L 149, 5.7.1971, p. 2.

2

---
#### Lily Mae MEREDITH, Appellant, v. William J. ORCUTT, Jr., et ux., Appellees.

No. J-196.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. First District.

April 9, 1968.

Rehearing Denied June 24, 1968.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.