alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 
                     18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Pharmacyclics, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the
"Company"), on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
"Report"), I, Robert W. Duggan, Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer
of the Company, certify, pursuant to   906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.   1350), that to my knowledge:

(1)

(2)

/s/

---

May 12, 2009



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 
                                 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Pharmacyclics, Inc, a Delaware corporation (the
"Company"), on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
"Report"), I, Rainer M. Erdtmann, Vice President, Finance and Administration and Secretary of the Company, certify, pursuant to
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.   1350), that to my knowledge:

(1)

(2)

/s/ RAINER M. ERDTMANN

---

May 12, 2009
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT

TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Sara Lee Corporation (the Company) for the fiscal year ended July 1, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the Report), I, Brenda C. Barnes, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                 
|-------------------------------------------------
|Dated: September 14, 2006                        
|                                                 
|/s/ Brenda C. Barnes,                            
|Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**

 

**PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2011 (the “Report”) of New Mountain Finance Holdings, L.L.C.  (the “Registrant”), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Adam B. Weinstein, the Chief Financial Officer of the Registrant, hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge, that:

 

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.

 
|      | /s/ Adam B. Weinstein    |
|-----------|--------------------------|
| **Name:** | **Adam B. Weinstein**    |
| **Date:** | **August 11, 2011** |

 

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM (A) VERITAS
DGC INC.'S FORM 10-K FOR THE YEAR ENDED JULY 31, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH 10K.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUL-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             AUG-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               JUL-31-1997
<CASH>                                          71,177
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  121,592
<ALLOWANCES>                                       646
<INVENTORY>                                      2,333
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               205,435
<PP&E>                                         240,758
<DEPRECIATION>                                 108,004
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 381,261
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           83,365
<BONDS>                                         75,588
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           200
<OTHER-SE>                                     221,101
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   381,261
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               362,715
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  332,406
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               7,484
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 30,309
<INCOME-TAX>                                     6,062
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             25,125
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    25,125
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.33
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.33
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>   1
                                  VERITY, INC.

                   STATEMENT OF COMPUTATION OF LOSS PER SHARE
                    (IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE AMOUNTS)


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                   THREE MONTHS ENDED
                                                                  AUG. 31,    AUG. 31,
                                                                    1995        1996
                                                                    ----        ----
<S>                                                               <C>         <C>
Primary and Fully Diluted:
  Weighted average common shares outstanding for the period...
                                                                      1,822      10,744
  Common Equivalent Shares pursuant to Staff Accounting                             ---
    Bulletin No. 83...........................................        2,236
                                                                  ---------   ---------
Shares used in per share calculation..........................                   10,744
                                                                      4,058
                                                                  =========   =========
Net loss before accretion.....................................    $    (436)  $  (1,283)
Accretion to redemption value of mandatorily redeemable           
  preferred stock.............................................         (418)        ---
                                                                  ---------   ---------
Net loss applicable to common stockholders....................    $    (854)  $  (1,283)
                                                                          
                                                                  =========   =========
Net loss per share............................................    $   (0.21)    $ (0.12)
                                                                  =========   =========       
</TABLE>
                                                                  


                                       88
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff - Appellee,

 v.

NZELO CHINEDU OKAFOR,

 Defendant - Appellant.

No. 13-50070

D.C. No. 2:99-cr-01088-MMM-1

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Central District of California

Margaret M. Morrow, District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted December 5, 2013

Pasadena, California

Before: CANBY, WATFORD, and HURWITZ, Circuit Judges.

Defendant Nzelo Okafor appeals the district court’s order denying his

motion to reduce his sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) and his motion

for reconsideration of the district court’s earlier reduction of his sentence. We

FILED

DEC 19 2013

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

 * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

Page 1 of 3
review de novo whether the district court has jurisdiction to reduce a defendant’s

sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2). United States v. Austin, 676 F.3d 924, 926

(9th Cir. 2012). We review for abuse of discretion the district court’s denial of a

motion for reconsideration. United States v. Tapia-Marquez, 361 F.3d 535, 537

(9th Cir. 2004). 

A defendant is eligible for a sentence reduction if the sentence originally

imposed was “based on a sentencing range that has subsequently been lowered by

the Sentencing Commission.” 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2). The district court properly

concluded that Okafor was not eligible for a further sentence reduction because

Amendment 750 did not lower his applicable guidelines range. The district court

determined on three occasions—during Okafor’s original sentencing proceeding,

first sentence reduction proceeding, and second sentence reduction

proceeding—that Okafor’s base offense level is that associated with 2.812

kilograms of a mixture containing cocaine base. The offense level associated with

2.812 kilograms of a mixture containing cocaine base remains 36, as it was when

the court granted Okafor’s first sentence reduction motion. USSG Manual, §

2D1.1(c)(2) (2012). Because Okafor’s base offense level and criminal history

category have not been lowered since his sentence was last reduced, he is not

eligible for a sentence reduction.

Page 2 of 3
The district court also did not abuse its discretion in denying Okafor’s

motion for reconsideration of its earlier reduction of his sentence. Okafor

proffered no new evidence to support his claim that his sentence should have been

reduced to an amount below 193 months. Nor did Okafor point to any

misrepresentation, mistake, or surprise that might warrant reconsideration. See

Fed. R. Civ. P. § 60(b)(1), (2); United States v. Fiorelli, 337 F.3d 282, 286 (3d Cir.

2003) (noting that motions for reconsideration may be filed in criminal cases and

are subject to Fed. R. Civ. P. 59 and 60). Under these circumstances, the district

court appropriately denied Okafor’s motion for reconsideration. 

AFFIRMED. 

Page 3 of 3
260 La. 1127

#### William J. SIMON v. FORD MOTOR COMPANY et al.

No. 52228.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

March 8, 1972.

In re: William J. Simon applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, Parish of East Baton Rouge.

It is ordered that the writ of review issue; that the Court of Appeal send up the record in duplicate of the case; and that counsel for plaintiff and defendant be notified.
Exhibit
32.1




CERTIFICATION




In
connection with the quarterly report of Geos Communications, Inc. (the
“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending June 30, 2010, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Andrew L. Berman, Chief
Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer) of the Company, hereby certify
as of the date hereof, solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350
of the United States Code, that to the best of my knowledge:




(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as
applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and




(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates
and for the periods indicated.




Date:August  13,
      2010
                      /s/ Andrew L.
  BermanAndrew
      L. Berman
                        Chief
      Executive Officer
                        (Principal
      Executive
Officer)
V

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 3209

For the relief of Kevin and Nancy Weiss.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

SEPTEMBER 30, 1993

Mr. GINGRICH introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Ways and Means

A BILL

For the relief of Kevin and Nancy Weiss.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. ROLLOVER OF GAIN ON SALE OF PRINCIPAL

4 RESIDENCE.

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—For purposes of applying section

6 1034 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to

7 rollover of gain on sale of principal residence) with respect

8 to the residence sold by Kevin and Nancy Weiss on No9 vember 2, 1987, in Ridgefield, Connecticut, the residence

10 purchased by Kevin and Nancy Weiss on November 15,

11 1989, in Atlanta, Georgia, shall be treated as purchased
2

•HR 3209 IH

1 within 2 years after the date of the sale of such Ridgefield,

2 Connecticut, residence.

3 (b) If refund or credit of any overpayment of tax re4 sulting from the application of subsection (a) is prevented

5 at any time before the close of the 1-year period beginning

6 on the date of the enactment of this Act by the operation

7 of any law or rule of law (including res judicata), refund

8 or credit of such overpayment (to the extent attributable

9 to the application of subsection (a)) may, nevertheless, be

10 made or allowed if claim therefor is filed before the close

11 of such 1-year period.

Æ
U.S. flag
              An official website of the United States government Skip to main content   end of header Census.gov Newsroom Releases Construction Industries Housing
 Newsroom Archive
 Skip left menu navigation
 About the Newsroom
 				Facts for Features
 				**News Releases**
 				Press Kits
 				Tip Sheets
 Release Information CB12-TPS.27 **Contact:**  Public Information Office
301-763-3030
 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:  FRIDAY, JUNE 1, 2012 2011 Characteristics of New Housing This report provides annual statistics on the characteristics of new privately owned residential structures for the U.S. and the nation’s four regions — Northeast, South, Midwest and West. The statistics are gathered from the Census Bureau’s Survey of Construction, and the report includes characteristics such as type of wall material, number of bedrooms and bathrooms, type of financing, heating and square footage. Internet address: <https://www.census.gov/construction/chars/>. **No news release associated with this report. Tip Sheet only.**
  CONNECT WITH US

Information Quality
                    Data Linkage Infrastructure
                    Data Protection and Privacy Policy
                    Accessibility      
                    FOIA
                    Inspector General
                    No FEAR Act
                    U.S. Department of Commerce
                    USA.gov
                   Measuring America's People, Places, and Economy
#### GULF ENTERPRISES, INC. v. MARYLAND CASUALTY COMPANY.

No. 53014.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Jan. 23, 1973.

In re: Maryland Casualty Company applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, Parish of Orleans. 267 So.2d 733.

Writ denied: the result is correct.

SUMMERS and BARHAM, Justices, are of the opinion the writ should be granted.
U.S. flag
              An official website of the United States government Skip to main content   end of header Census.gov Newsroom Releases African American Business Ownership En Español
 Newsroom Archive
 Skip left menu navigation
 About the Newsroom
 				Facts for Features
 				**News Releases**
 				Press Kits
 				Tip Sheets
 Release Information CB11-R.16SP **Contact:**  Briana Kaya Public Information Office
301-763-3030/3762 (fax)
 PARA PUBLICACIÓN INMEDIATA:  MARTES, 8 DE FEBRERO DE 2011 La Oficina del Censo Revela un Aumento de 71 Por Ciento en el Número de Empresas Cuyos Propietarios son de Raza Negra en el Área Metropolitana de Detroit El número de empresas cuyos propietarios son de raza negra en el área estadística  metropolitana de Detroit-Warren-Livonia, Mich., aumentó a 53,380 en el 2007 de 31,208 empresas en el 2002, lo cual representa un aumento de 71.0 por ciento, anunció hoy la Oficina del Censo de los Estados Unidos. Durante el mismo período, los ingresos generados por dichas empresas aumentaron 16.9 por ciento con $3.7 mil millones. A nivel nacional, el número de empresas cuyos propietarios son de raza negra aumentó a 1.9 millones de empresas, un aumento de 60.5 por ciento, y las ventas de dichas empresas aumentaron a $137.5 mil millones, un aumento de 55.1 por ciento. Las industrias en el área metropolitana con el mayor número de empresas cuyos propietarios son de raza negra incluyen servicios de reparación, maintenimiento, personales y de lavandería (14,199 empresas); cuidado de salud y asistencia social (13,662 empresas); y  servicios de administración y apoyo y manejo de desperdicios y remediación (5,569 empresas). Dichos datos provienen de la Encuesta de Empresarios de 2007, la cual forma parte del Censo Económico de 2007. La encuesta provee información detallada cada cinco años sobre empresas cuyos propietarios son de raza negra, incluyendo el número de firmas, ventas e ingresos, número de empleados remunerados y nómina anual para estados, condados, ciudades y áreas metropolitanas.  La Encuesta de Empresarios se levanta cada cinco años como parte del censo económico. La encuesta de 2007 recopiló datos de una muestra de más de 2.3 millones de empresas. Los datos recopilados en la muestra de una encuesta están sujetos a la variabilidad de la muestra y a errores ajenos al muestreo. Los errores ajenos al muestreo se deben a errores en las respuestas, falta de respuestas o cobertura. Para más información acerca del diseño, metodología y limitaciones de los datos de la Encuesta de Empresarios, consulte  <https://www.census.gov/econ/sbo/methodology.html>. Nota del editor: Los datos están disponibles en  https://www.census.gov/econ/sbo/.
  CONNECT WITH US

Information Quality
                    Data Linkage Infrastructure
                    Data Protection and Privacy Policy
                    Accessibility      
                    FOIA
                    Inspector General
                    No FEAR Act
                    U.S. Department of Commerce
                    USA.gov
                   Measuring America's People, Places, and Economy
#### Arnett BRYANT, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

No. 43937.

Supreme Court of Florida.

July 10, 1973.

Cause dismissed. 276 So.2d 184.

CARLTON, C. J., and ROBERTS, ERVIN, McCAIN and DEKLE, JJ., concur.
#### ROGER DEAN CHEVROLET, INC., etc., Petitioner, v. William JOHNSON, etc., et al., Respondents. GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION, etc., Petitioner, v. William JOHNSON, etc., et al., Respondents.

Nos. 43692, 43695.

Supreme Court of Florida.

July 12, 1973.

Certiorari denied. 274 So.2d 261.

ERVIN, Acting C. J., and ADKINS, BOYD, McCAIN and DEKLE, JJ., concur.
From: "Higgins, Cortney" <Cortney_Higgins@omb.eop.gov> 

To: RobertJ Wayland/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Karen Thundiyil/DC/USEPA/US@EPA 

Date: 12/08/2011 06:14 PM 

Subject: FW: E.O. 12866 Meeting on EGU MACT Rule 

Hi, 

Attached is the handout from the meeting today. 

 

Regards, 

Cortney 

 

-----Original Appointment----- 

From: Echols, Mabel E. 

Subject: E.O. 12866 Meeting on EGU MACT Rule 

When: Thursday, December 08, 2011 1:00 PM-1:30 PM (UTC-05:00) Eastern 

Time 

(US & Canada). 

Where: Room 10103 NEOB 

 

This meeting was requested by Anthony Kavanagh, American Electric Power.
```

[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 10 (Tuesday, January 15, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Page 2961]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-00787]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION

Sunshine Act Meeting--Closed Meeting

    The following notice of a closed meeting is published pursuant to 
the provisions of the Government in the Sunshine Act, Public Law 94-
409, 5 U.S.C. 552b.

AGENCY HOLDING THE MEETING:  Commodity Futures Trading Commission.

TIME AND DATE: January 14, 2013 at 10:00 a.m.

PLACE: Three Lafayette Center, 1155 21st St. NW., Washington, DC, 9th 
Floor Commission Conference Room.

STATUS: Closed.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: Litigation Matters. In the event that the 
time or date of this meeting changes, an announcement of the change, 
along with the new time and place of the meeting will be posted on the 
Commission's Web site at www.cftc.gov.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Stacy D. Yochum, Counsel to the 
Executive Director, 202-418-5157.

Stacy D. Yochum,
Counsel to the Executive Director.
[FR Doc. 2013-00787 Filed 1-11-13; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 6351-01-P
```
EXHIBIT 32.2

WRITTEN STATEMENT

PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with Annual Report of Comtech Group, Inc. and its
subsidiaries (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, Hope Ni, Chief Financial Officer of
the Company certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13a-14(b) or 15d-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                      |  |        |  |                        
|--------------------- |  | ------ |  | -----------------------
|Dated: March 28, 2006 |  | By:    |  | /s/ Hope Ni            
|                      |  | Name:  |  | Hope Ni                
|                      |  | Title: |  | Chief Financial Officer
**Exhibit 32**

 

**STATEMENT PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350AS REQUIRED BYSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with theAnnual Report of John Deere Capital Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Kfor the year ending October 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned herebycertify that to the best of our knowledge:

 

1.               TheReport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.               Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
|   | December 22, 2004 | */s/ R. W. Lane*      | * * | Chairman and Principal Executive Officer               |
|--------|------------------------|-----------------------|----------|--------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                   |                  |     |                                                   |
|   |                   |                  |     |                                                   |
|   | December 22, 2004 | */s/ Nathan J. Jones* | * * | Senior Vice President and Principal Financial  Officer |

 

A signed original of this written statementrequired by Section 906 has been provided to John Deere CapitalCorporation and will be retained by John Deere Capital Corporation andfurnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

1

----