alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2012202EN.01000501.xml

| 10.7.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 202/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.7.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 202/5

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

9 July 2012

2012/C 202/05

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,2293 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 97,81 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4387 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,79360 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 8,6225 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,2010 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 7,4965 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 25,536 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 289,61 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,6962 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,2333 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,5340 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,2441 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,2082 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,2554 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 9,5332 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,5484 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,5631 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 404,59 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 10,1986 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,8336 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,4958 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 11 582,42 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 3,9194 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 51,686 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 40,6070 |
| THB | Thai baht | 39,043 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 2,4948 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 16,5464 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 68,7610 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,2293

JPY

Japanese yen

97,81

DKK

Danish krone

7,4387

GBP

Pound sterling

0,79360

SEK

Swedish krona

8,6225

CHF

Swiss franc

1,2010

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

7,4965

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

25,536

HUF

Hungarian forint

289,61

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,6962

PLN

Polish zloty

4,2333

RON

Romanian leu

4,5340

TRY

Turkish lira

2,2441

AUD

Australian dollar

1,2082

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,2554

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

9,5332

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,5484

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,5631

KRW

South Korean won

1 404,59

ZAR

South African rand

10,1986

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,8336

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,4958

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

11 582,42

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

3,9194

PHP

Philippine peso

51,686

RUB

Russian rouble

40,6070

THB

Thai baht

39,043

BRL

Brazilian real

2,4948

MXN

Mexican peso

16,5464

INR

Indian rupee

68,7610

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
<PAGE>
<PAGE> 71

                                                                Exhibit 23






                      CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS




We  consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement
(Form S-3  Number 33-47865) of  American General  Finance, Inc. and  in the
related Prospectus of our  report dated February 23, 1998, with  respect to
the consolidated  financial statements  and  schedule of  American  General
Finance, Inc. and subsidiaries  included in this Annual Report  (Form 10-K)
for the year ended December 31, 1997.


                                           ERNST & YOUNG, LLP


Indianapolis, Indiana
March 17, 1998
<PAGE>
Order entered March 19, 2015

In The 

## Court of Appeals **Fifth District of Texas at Dallas**
No. 05
- 14
- 01592
- CV LAVANTIA HAMILTON, Appellant V. MARY LEE, Appellee On Appeal from the 305th Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No . JD - 11
- 00436
- X 

### O RDER The clerk’s record in this case is overdue. By postcard dated December 23, 2014, we notified the Dallas County District Clerk that the clerk’s record was overdue. We directed the district clerk to file the clerk’s record within th irty days. To date, the clerk’s record has not been filed. Accordingly, we ORDER the Dallas County District Clerk to file, within TEN DAYS of the date of this order, either the clerk’s record or written verification that appellant has not been found indig ent and has not paid for the record. We NOTIFY appellant that if we receive verification s he is not indigent and has not paid for the record, we will, without further notice, dismiss the appeal

. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 37.3(b).We DIRECT the Clerk of the Cou rt to send a copy of this order by electronic transmission to Felicia Pitre, Dallas County District Clerk and to all parties.

/s/ CAROLYN WRIGHT CHIEF JUSTICE
Exhibit 10.18



                                                     September 7, 2001
Mr. William McMenemy
c/o Del Laboratories, Inc.
178 EAB Plaza, 8th floor
Uniondale, NY  11556

Re:  Amendment to Employment Agreement

Dear Bill:

         Reference is made to the employment agreement , dated April 1, 2001 (as
amended, the "AGREEMENT"), between you and Del Laboratories, Inc. ("DEL").

         Del and you hereby agree to amend the Agreement as follows:

1.       In the second sentence of Section 1 ("Title; Term"), the phrase
         "four-year term" shall be deleted and replaced by the phrase "five-year
         term".

2.       In the first sentence of Section 2 ("Salary"), the phrase "Three
         Hundred Twenty Thousand Dollars ($320,000)" shall be deleted and
         replaced by the phrase "Three Hundred Fifty Thousand Dollars
         ($350,000).

3.       In the first sentence of Section 7(c) ("Legal and Accounting Fees"),
         the figure "$10,000" shall be deleted and replaced by the figure
         "$15,000".

         As amended hereby, the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect.

                                                     Sincerely,
                                                     DEL LABORATORIES, INC.


                                                     By: /s/ Dan K. Wassong
                                                         ------------------
                                                            Dan K. Wassong
                                                            President

     ACCEPTED AND AGREED TO:

     /s/ William McMenemy
     --------------------
     William McMenemy






<PAGE>
APPENDIX D

CMS Performance Evaluation Test Report
**Final Listing of Questionnaire Files for Steam Electric Rulemaking Record**

**Plant ID 09093**  **Removed from Public**  **(Non-CBI) Docket**  **1 Copyright** 

**Flag 2**  **File Name Description**  09093\09093_ Certification Statement.pdf Plant certification statement 09093\09093_ HardcopyLog.doc EPA log of hardcopy documents submitted 09093\09093_Completeness Checklist.xls EPA Completeness Review Checklist x 09093\09093_PartA.xls Plant submitted survey file x 09093\09093_PartB.xls Plant submitted survey file x 09093\09093_PartC.xls Plant submitted survey file x 09093\09093_PartD.xls Plant submitted survey file x 09093\09093_PartE.xls Plant submitted survey file x 09093\09093_PartH.xls Plant submitted survey file x 09093\09093_PlantID_Checklist.xls EPA Technical Review Checklist Workbook

09093\SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS\09093_ash block diagramx.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x x 09093\SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS\09093_Closed ponds and landfill plot plan.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 09093\SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS\09093_Corrective Actions Design Approval.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

09093\SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS\09093_Site Locus Map.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey 09093\SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS\09093_Site Plan.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 09093\SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS\09093_Water Balance Diagram.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

1Final reviewed survey responses are located in the Steam Electric Technical Questionnaire Database

. 2Copyright documents are available from the docket.
#### In re Richard Joe JOHNSON, alias v. STATE. Ex parte Richard Joe Johnson.

SC 678.

Supreme Court of Alabama.

Jan. 31, 1974.

Myron K. Allenstein, Gadsden, for petitioner.

No brief for the State.

FAULKNER, Justice.

Petition of Richard Joe Johnson for Cer-tiorari to the Court of Criminal Appeals to review and revise the judgment and decision of that Court in Johnson alias v. State, 52 Ala.App. 94, 289 So.2d 662.

Writ denied.

HEFLIN, C. J., and MERRILL, HAR-WOOD and MADDOX, JJ., concur.
<PAGE>

                       SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

                             Washington, D.C. 20549

                           ---------------------------

                                    Form 8-K

                                 CURRENT REPORT
                       PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF
                       THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

        Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported): August 15, 2000


                           AAMES FINANCIAL CORPORATION
             (Exact name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)


         Delaware                        0-19604                  95-340340
----------------------------           ------------          -----------------
(State or Other Jurisdiction           (Commission           (IRS Employer
     of Incorporation)                 File Number)          Identification No.)



                       350 South Grand Avenue, 52nd Floor
                          Los Angeles, California 90071
                    (Address of Principal Executive Offices)



                                 (323) 210-5000
              ----------------------------------------------------
              (Registrant's Telephone Number, Including Area Code)


                                       NA
          -------------------------------------------------------------
          (Former Name or Former Address, if Changed Since Last Report)




<PAGE>

ITEM 5.  OTHER EVENTS

         Reference is made to the press release of Registrant issued on August
15, 2000 which contains information meeting the requirements of this Item 5 and
is incorporated herein by this reference. A copy of the press releases are
attached to this Form 8-K as Exhibit 99.1.


ITEM 7.  FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND EXHIBITS

         (c)               EXHIBITS

         99.1              Press release issued August 15, 2000.


                                       2
<PAGE>



                                   SIGNATURES

         Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended, the Registrant has duly caused this Current Report on Form 8-K to be
signed on its behalf by the undersigned hereunto duly authorized.


                                            AAMES FINANCIAL CORPORATION





Dated: August 17, 2000                      By:      /s/     Ralph W. Flick
                                                     ---------------------------
                                                     Ralph W. Flick
                                                     Assistant Secretary


                                       3
<PAGE>



                                  EXHIBIT INDEX


Exhibit No.                         Description of Exhibit
-----------                         ----------------------

      99.1                          Press release issued August 15, 2000.


                                       4
# C_2014234EN.01000602.xml

| 19.7.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 234/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.7.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 234/6

---

Information communicated by Member States regarding closure of fisheries

2014/C 234/08

In accordance with Article 35(3) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1224/2009 of 20 November 2009 establishing a Community control system for ensuring compliance with the rules of the common fisheries policy (1), a decision has been taken to close the fishery as set down in the following table:

1

| Date and time of closure | 25.6.2014 |
| --- | --- |
| Duration | 25.6.2014 - 31.12.2014 |
| Member State | Ireland |
| Stock or Group of stocks | ARU/567. |
| Species | Greater silver smelt (Argentina silus) |
| Zone | Union and international waters of V, VI and VII |
| Type(s) of fishing vessels | — |
| Reference number | 11/TQ43 |

Date and time of closure

25.6.2014

Duration

25.6.2014 - 31.12.2014

Member State

Ireland

Stock or Group of stocks

ARU/567.

Species

Greater silver smelt (Argentina silus)

Argentina silus

Zone

Union and international waters of V, VI and VII

Type(s) of fishing vessels

—

Reference number

11/TQ43

---

(1)  OJ L 343, 22.12.2009, p. 1.

1

---
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

 WASHINGTON, D.C. 20460

 OFFICE OF WATER

MEMORANDUM

DATE: August 1, 2011 

SUBJECT: Corrections made to the Belews Creek data provided by Duke Energy

TO: Ronald Jordan, USEPA

FROM: Cuc Schroeder, USEPA

This memorandum provides a summary of the corrections made to the Belews Creek data

provided to EPA by Duke Energy. The data were initially delivered to EPA on July 15, 2011. 

After an initial review of the data, some issues were found, and EPA subsequently asked for 

clarification regarding these issues.

In an email from Ronald Jordan to Nathan Craig (dated 07/20/2011), EPA detailed the 

inconsistencies found in the data and requested Duke Energy to address the potential errors. 

Duke Energy responded to EPA’s request in an email from Nathan Craig to Ronald Jordan (dated 

07/21/2011). The data issues that were clarified all had to do with errors in certain detection 

indicators. The table given below provides details about the corrections made to the data. The 

corrections are arranged by sampling location, analyte, and collection date.
Page 2

Table: Summary of the corrected detection indicators for the Belews Creek data, arranged by 

sampling location, analyte, and date.

Sampling Location Analyte Date Original Detect Indicator Corrected Detect Indicator

Bio 1 In

Copper 1/21/2010 Detected Non-Detected

Chromium 4/7/2010 Detected Non-Detected

Mercury 2/6/2008 Detected Non-Detected

2/9/2008 Detected Non-Detected

Zinc

2/7/2008 Non-Detected Detected

2/15/2008 Non-Detected Detected

3/1/2008 Non-Detected Detected

3/15/2008 Non-Detected Detected

3/17/2008 Non-Detected Detected

3/18/2008 Non-Detected Detected

2/9/2008 Detected Non-Detected

8/18/2008 Detected Non-Detected

8/25/2008 Detected Non-Detected

9/22/2008 Detected Non-Detected

Bio 2 Eff

Arsenic

2/7/2008 Non-Detected Detected

2/8/2008 Non-Detected Detected

2/10/2008 Non-Detected Detected

2/12/2008 Non-Detected Detected

2/13/2008 Non-Detected Detected

2/14/2008 Non-Detected Detected

2/15/2008 Non-Detected Detected

2/16/2008 Non-Detected Detected

2/17/2008 Non-Detected Detected

2/21/2008 Non-Detected Detected

Cadmium 2/6/2008 Detected Non-Detected

2/9/2008 Detected Non-Detected

Chromium 2/6/2008 Detected Non-Detected

2/9/2008 Detected Non-Detected

Mercury

2/6/2008 Detected Non-Detected

9/29/2008 Non-Detected Detected

8/11/2010 Non-Detected Detected

9/8/2010 Non-Detected Detected

10/7/2010 Non-Detected Detected

Selenium 3/3/2008 Non-Detected Detected
#### Martha A. JONES, sometimes known as Martha Bragg, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 71-330.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Feb. 1, 1972.

Appeal dismissed.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                   EXHIBIT 10(l)


                                                  May 23, 2001

VIA FEDERAL EXPRESS

Mr. Richard E. Bailey

Dear Dick:

     This letter is to confirm our recent conversation regarding a clarification
of the letter agreement dated April 30, 2001 (the "Severance Agreement") between
you and Dean Foods Company (the "Company") concerning your separation from
employment by the Company.

     Specifically, this letter is to amend the Severance Agreement to eliminate
an inconsistency in its terms. For your convenience, I have enclosed a copy of
the signed Severance Agreement. Accordingly, the Severance Agreement is hereby
amended as follows:

     Enumerated Point 1 under the section captioned "CIC Benefits" is
     eliminated in its entirety and the following provision is inserted in
     its place:

     "1. A payment equal to $984,000.00, in lieu of two years of annual
     incentive bonus awards, less legal deductions, payable within thirty
     (30) days after the above-described Change-In-Control of the Company."

All other provisions of the Severance Agreement shall remain in full force and
effect.

     In order to accept this amendment to the Severance Agreement, please return
a signed copy of this letter to me within twenty-one (21) days after the date of
your receipt of this letter. You can also revoke this amendment within seven (7)
days after you sign it. You are advised to contact an attorney prior to
executing this amendment.


<PAGE>   2


     Please acknowledge immediately below that you received this amendment on
May 24, 2001. You may do so by signing each of the three enclosed originals
under the receipt line and return one duplicate original to me in the enclosed
overnight envelope.

                                                  Very truly yours,

                                                  DEAN FOODS COMPANY


                                                  /s/ Dale E. Kleber
                                                  -----------------------------
                                                  Dale E. Kleber
                                                  Vice President, Secretary and
                                                  General Counsel
DEK:mc
Enclosures




I received this Amendment on     5/24/01
                             ---------------

                                             Signature:  /s/ Richard E. Bailey
                                             -----------------------------------
                                             Date:   5/24/01
                                                  ------------------------------

I have read and understand the Amendment and accept and agree to it.

                                             Signature:  /s/ Richard E. Bailey
                                             -----------------------------------
                                             Date:   5/24/01
                                                  ------------------------------


Employee's Full name:

Richard E. Bailey
No. 11386.

#### King et al., Exrs., *v.*Smith.

Decided December 14, 1909.

.Error to Circuit Court of Perry county.

*Mr. M. A. Daugherty,*for plaintiffs in error.

*Mr. John Ferguson*and *Mr. Owen Yost,*for defendant in error.

Judgment affirmed.

Crew, C. J., Spear, Davis, Shauck and Price, JJ., concur.
#### Larry Vincent GYSIN, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 67-837.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Third District.

Oct. 26, 1967.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed.
#### William H. Rohr, Respondent, *v.*George W. Linch, as Receiver of the Second Avenue Railroad Company, Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department,

October, 1912.)

Appeal—settlement of case on — expiration of time to — City Court of city of New York.

Where an order of the City Court of the city of New York, denying a new trial, and reciting that it was entered on motion of plaintiff’s attorney, was not served on the defendant, an order denying his motion to settle the ease on appeal will be reversed on the ground that his time to appeal from the order denying the new trial had not expired.

Appeal by defendant from an order of the City Court of the city of ¡New York denying the defendant’s motion to settle his proposed case on appeal.

Charles E. Chalmers, for appellant.

Abraham ¡M¡. Pariser, for respondent.

Guy, J.

Plaintiff recovered a verdict on February 29, 1912, on' which judgment was entered on March 2, 1912, and a copy of the judgment with notice of entry was duly served on the same day.

On March fourth, defendant entered and on March fourth or sixth he served a copy of the usual order denying his motion for a new trial, which recited that it was entered on motion of the plaintiff’s attorney. This order was never served upon defendant, but was only served by defendant upon plaintiff.

On March 30, 1912, .defendant served a notice of appeal from both judgment and order.

The time to serve a notice of appeal from the judgment ex pired on March twelfth (Code Civ. Pro., § 3190), but the time to appeal from the order denying a motion for a new *46trial hacl not expired, because that order was never served upon the defendant. Code Civ. Pro., § 3190; Bayliss N. Tr. & App. 173; Harnett v. Westcott, 16 N. Y. St. Repr. 810; Kolatch v. Wiltchik, N. Y. L. J. March 16, 1909.

Service by the loser upon the winner does not limit the former’s time to appeal. Kilmer v. Hathorn, 78 N. Y. 228, 231, 232; Smith v. Havens Relief Soc., 115 App. Div. 185, 187; McGruer v. Abbott, 47 id. 191, 193.

Order reversed and motion granted, with ten dollars costs and disbursements of the appeal.

Seabury and Bijur, JJ., concur.

Order reversed and motion granted.
Appeal Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed August 8, 2019.

In The 

Fourteenth Court of Appeals 

NO. 14-19-00350-CV

JIMMY GETTINGS, Appellant 

V.

DARLENE BOUNDS, GRADY GETTINGS, BELVA GETTINGS, CHURCH 

OF CHRIST, MILL ROAD, OF DURHAM, NORTH CAROLINA, CHURCH 

OF CHRIST OF CHAMPIONS OF HOUSTON, TEXAS DOES 1-25, 

Appellees 

On Appeal from the 189th District Court 

Harris County, Texas 

Trial Court Cause No. 2018-02794 

MEMORANDUM OPINION 

This is an appeal from two orders: (1) “Order Granting Grady and Belva 

Gettings’ Motion for Sanctions Against Plaintiff for Failure to Comply with Notice 

and Service of Subpoena Per Rule 21 and 21a, and for Discovery Sanctions,” signed 

April 1, 2019; and (2) “Order on Gettings Family Defendants’ No-Evidence Motion 

for Summary Judgment,” signed April 8, 2019. The district clerk has certified that 
2

the record below does not contain a signed final judgment. 

Generally, appeals may be taken only from final judgments. Lehmann v. Har 

Con Corp., 39 S.W.3d 191, 195 (Tex. 2001). When orders do not dispose of all 

pending parties and claims, the orders remain interlocutory and unappealable until 

final judgment is rendered unless a statutory exception applies. Bally Total Fitness 

Corp. v. Jackson, 53 S.W.3d 352, 352 (Tex. 2001); Jack B. Anglin Co., Inc. v. Tipps, 

842 S.W.2d 266, 272 (Tex. 1992) (orig. proceeding). There are no statutory 

provisions granting the right to appeal the interlocutory orders at issue in this case.

On June 28, 2019, we notified the parties of our intent to dismiss the appeal 

for want of jurisdiction unless any party filed a response in this court by July 12, 

2019, demonstrating grounds for continuing the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(a). 

No response has been filed. 

The appeal is dismissed for lack of appellate jurisdiction.

PER CURIAM 

Panel consists of Chief Justice Frost and Justices Wise and Hassan.