alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2014020EN.01000601.xml

| 23.1.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 20/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.1.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 20/6

---

New national side of euro coins intended for circulation

(2014/C 20/06)

Image

National side of the new commemorative 2-euro coin intended for circulation and issued by Luxembourg

National side of the new commemorative 2-euro coin intended for circulation and issued by Luxembourg

Euro coins intended for circulation have legal tender status throughout the euro area. For the purpose of informing the public and all parties who handle the coins, the Commission publishes a description of the designs of all new coins (1). In accordance with the Council conclusions of 10 February 2009 (2), euro-area Member States and countries that have concluded a monetary agreement with the European Union providing for the issuing of euro coins are allowed to issue commemorative euro coins intended for circulation, provided that certain conditions are met, particularly that only the 2-euro denomination is used. These coins have the same technical characteristics as other 2-euro coins, but their national face features a commemorative design that is highly symbolic in national or European terms.

1

2

Issuing country: Luxembourg

Issuing country

Subject of commemoration: the 175th anniversary of the independence of the Grand-Duchy of Luxembourg

Subject of commemoration

Description of the design: The coin depicts on the right hand side of its inner part the effigy of His Royal Highness, the Grand-Duke Henri, looking to the right, and on the left hand side of its inner part, vertically positioned, the years ‘1839’ and ‘2014’ and the name of the issuing country ‘LËTZEBUERG’. The inscriptions ‘ONOFHÄNGEGKEET’ and ‘175 Joër’ appear at the bottom of the inner part of the coin.

Description of the design

The coin’s outer ring depicts the 12 stars of the European flag.

Number of coins to be issued: 1,4 million

Number of coins to be issued

Date of issue: January 2014

Date of issue

---

(1)  See OJ C 373, 28.12.2001, p. 1, for the national faces of all the coins issued in 2002.

1

(2)  See the conclusions of the Economic and Financial Affairs Council of 10 February 2009 and the Commission Recommendation of 19 December 2008 on common guidelines for the national sides and the issuance of euro coins intended for circulation (OJ L 9, 14.1.2009, p. 52).

2

---
# C_2013308EN.01000101.xml

| 23.10.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 308/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.10.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 308/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.6990 — Vodafone/Kabel Deutschland)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2013/C 308/01

On 20 September 2013, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32013M6990. EUR-Lex is the online access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32013M6990. EUR-Lex is the online access to the European law.

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                          22,635
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                50,000
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    425,111
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                       1,922,050
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                         1,884,623
<LOANS>                                         98,626
<ALLOWANCE>                                        100
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,639,427
<DEPOSITS>                                   1,377,567
<SHORT-TERM>                                 1,051,856
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                             39,261
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           24,225
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           148
<OTHER-SE>                                     146,370
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>               2,639,427
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  1,416
<INTEREST-INVEST>                               36,378
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                     0
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                37,794
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                              12,510
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              24,837
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           12,957
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                        0
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                 41,774
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 11,295
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                      11,295
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     7,266
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.49
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.48
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    2.15
<LOANS-NON>                                          0
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                   100
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                        0
<RECOVERIES>                                         0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                  100
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                                 0
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0


</TABLE>
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 3251

To amend title II of the Social Security Act to extend the provisions which

currently suspend payment of old-age, survivors, and disability insurance

benefits to individuals imprisoned upon conviction of a felony so as

to apply to all individuals imprisoned throughout at least 1 month upon

conviction of any criminal offense, and to amend title XVI of such

Act to suspend payment of supplemental security income benefits to

such individuals.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

OCTOBER 7, 1993

Mr. TORKILDSEN (for himself, Mr. MEEHAN, Mr. CANADY, Mr. COPPERSMITH, Mr. FRANK of Massachusetts, Mr. BLUTE, Mr. KLUG, Mr. ZIMMER, Mr. GOSS, Mr. LEVY, and Mrs. THURMAN) introduced the following

bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

A BILL

To amend title II of the Social Security Act to extend the

provisions which currently suspend payment of old-age,

survivors, and disability insurance benefits to individuals

imprisoned upon conviction of a felony so as to apply

to all individuals imprisoned throughout at least 1 month

upon conviction of any criminal offense, and to amend

title XVI of such Act to suspend payment of supplemental security income benefits to such individuals.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 3151 IH

1 SECTION 1. SUSPENSION OF PAYMENT OF OLD-AGE, SURVI2 VORS, AND DISABILITY INSURANCE BENE3 FITS FOR INDIVIDUALS IMPRISONED

4 THROUGHOUT AT LEAST 1 MONTH UPON

5 CONVICTION OF A CRIMINAL OFFENSE.

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 202(x) of the Social Secu7 rity Act (42 U.S.C. 402(x)) is amended—

8 (1) in paragraph (1), by striking ‘‘during

9 which’’ and inserting ‘‘throughout which’’, and by

10 striking ‘‘an offense’’ and all that follows and insert11 ing ‘‘a criminal offense.’’; and

12 (2) in paragraph (3), by striking ‘‘an offense

13 which constituted a felony under applicable law’’ and

14 inserting ‘‘a criminal offense’’.

15 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by

16 subsection (a) shall apply with respect to months begin17 ning on or after the date of the enactment of this Act.

18 SEC. 2. SUSPENSION OF SUPPLEMENTAL SECURITY IN19 COME BENEFITS FOR INDIVIDUALS IMPRIS20 ONED THROUGHOUT AT LEAST 1 MONTH

21 UPON CONVICTION OF A CRIMINAL OFFENSE.

22 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 1611(e) of the Social Se23 curity Act (42 U.S.C. 1382c(a)(1)) is amended by insert24 ing after paragraph (3) the following:

25 ‘‘(4)(A) A person shall not be an eligible individual

26 or an eligible spouse for purposes of this title with respect
3

•HR 3151 IH

1 to any month if, throughout the month, the person is con2 fined in a jail, prison, or other penal institution or correc3 tional facility, pursuant to a conviction of a criminal of4 fense.

5 ‘‘(B) The requirements of section 202(x)(3) shall

6 apply in like manner to the carrying out of this para7 graph.’’.

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by

9 subsection (a) shall apply to benefits for calendar months

10 beginning on or after the date of the enactment of this

11 Act.

Æ
coke-ex101_189.htm



Exhibit 10.1

 



September 3, 2015

VIA EMAIL (hank.flint@ccbcc.com) 

CCBCC OPERATIONS, LLC
4100 Coca-Cola Plaza 
Charlotte, NC 28211 
Attn: Henry W. Flint


	
Re:
	
Distribution Agreement (the “Agreement”) entered into as of March 26, 2015 (“Effective Date”) between Monster Energy Company (“MEC”) and Ccbcc Operations, LLC (“Distributor”). Capitalized terms not otherwise defined herein shall have the meaning ascribed such terms in the Agreement and all references to section numbers shall refer to the section numbers in the Agreement.
	
 




Dear Mr. Flint:

MEC has determined, pursuant to the terms of the Agreement, and Distributor has agreed, that marketing, promoting, selling or sampling Products in K-12 schools, at K-12 school events or at activities in the immediate vicinity of K-12 schools may impair the value or otherwise damage the reputation or goodwill of MEC, the Products and the Trademarks.

This letter of amendment (the “Amendment”) is therefore entered into to formally amend the terms of the Agreement as of the Effective Date to give effect to the foregoing by adding the following Section 3.y. to Section 3 of the Agreement:

“y.Distributor shall not (a) directly sell Products in K-12 schools, including in school automated vending machines and concession stands, (b) directly provide samples of Products in or within the immediate vicinity of K-12 schools or (c) market, promote, sell or sample Products in K-12 schools or at K-12 school events or activities on K-12 school premises.”

Distributor and MEC acknowledge and agree that (a) this Amendment shall become effective as of the Effective Date when executed by both MEC and Distributor, (b) the Agreement, as amended by this Amendment, shall continue in full force and effect in accordance with its terms, and (c) this Amendment is limited as specified herein and shall not constitute an amendment or waiver of any other provision of the Agreement. This Amendment may be executed in any number of counterparts, each of which shall be an original but all of which, when taken together shall constitute one agreement.

 

 



 

Please acknowledge your acceptance of and agreement with the terms of this Amendment by signing where indicated below. Please return an original copy to MEC for its files.

Sincerely,

MONSTER ENERGY COMPANY

 

 /s/ Rodney Sacks

Rodney Sacks

Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

 

ACKNOWLEDGED AND AGREED TO:

CCBCC OPERATIONS, LLC

By:  /s/ Umesh Kasbekar

Print Name:  Umesh Kasbekar

Its:  Vice President
Exhibit 99.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report
of Dynamic Health Products, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the quarterly period ended December 31, 2002, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Cani I. Shuman, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ Cani I. Shuman

Cani I. Shuman

Chief Financial Officer

February 14, 2003
#### PIZZA PALACE OF MIAMI, INC., Appellant, v. Clifford RUSSELL et al., Appellees.

No. 71-409.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Jan. 18, 1972.

Rehearing Denied Feb. 9, 1972.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?


CA2012368EN.01000101.xml


| | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 28.11.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CA 368/1 |

---

Corrigendum to the notice of open competition

COM/AD/17/10 — SENIOR ECONOMIST

(
[Official Journal of the European Union C 289 A of 26 October 2010](http://publications.europa.eu/resource/oj/JOC_2010_289_A_TOC)
)

(2012/C 368 A/01)

On page 7, Section VII ‘Reserve list’, in point 1:

for:

| | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | | | --- | --- | | ‘1. | Candidates placed on the reserve list | | [...] The list will be valid until 31 December 2012.’ |

read:

| | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | | | --- | --- | | ‘1. | Candidates placed on the reserve list | | [...] The list will be valid until 31 December 2015.’ |

---
#### LISBON HOLDING AND INVESTMENT CO., Ltd., etc., et al., Petitioners, v. VILLAGE APARTMENTS, INC., etc., Respondent.

No. 40169.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Dec. 4, 1970.

Certiorari dismissed. 237 So.2d 197.
261 La. 540

#### CENTRAL CREDIT CORPORATION, MID-CITY BRANCH, Inc. v. James R. RAVENCRAFT.

No. 52375.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 18, 1972.

In re: James R. Ravencraft applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, Parish of East Baton Rouge. 258 So.2d 560.

Writ refused. On the facts found by the Court of Appeal there is no error of law in the judgment.
EXHIBIT 23.1
             Consent of Independent Certified Public Accountants

We have issued our reports dated December 11, 1998, accompanying the 
consolidated financial statements and schedule included in the Annual Report 
of Datamarine International, Inc. and Subsidiaries on Form 10-K for the year 
ended October 3, 1998.  We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference 
of said reports in the Registration Statements of Datamarine International, 
Inc. and Subsidiaries on Forms S-8 (File No. 2-68937) pertaining to the 
Employee Stock Purchase Plan, on Form S-8 (File No. 33-45832) pertaining to 
the 1991 Stock Option Plan, and on Form S-8 (File No. 333-06927) pertaining 
to the 1995 Stock Option Plan for Non-employee Directors.


/s/ GRANT THORNTON LLP
    ------------------

Seattle, Washington
January 19, 1999
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 18
- 6923

OLANDIO RAY WORKMAN , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,

v. METRO PCS MOBILE PHONE COMPANY; MR. RICHARDSON; MR. LEWIS, Greenville County Sheriff’s Office; GREENVILLE COUNTY SHERIFF’S OFFICE , Defendants

- Appellees

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina , at Greenville

. R. Bryan Harwell , District Judge. ( 6:17

- cv
- 01208

- RBH

- KFM )

Submitted : November 15, 2018 Decided: November 20, 2018

Before MOTZ and HARRIS , Circuit Judges , and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge

.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion

.
Olandio Ray Workman, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Olandio Ray Workman seeks to appeal the district court’s order adopting the magistrate judge’s recommendations and dismissing Workman’s 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint as to some Defendants and staying the action as to some De fendants

. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2012), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2012); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp. , 337 U.S. 541, 545

- 46 (1 949). The order
Workman seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.
DISMISSED
#### Victor H. Graymount, Plaintiff, *v.*Else F. Schlemmer et al., Defendants.

Supreme Court, Special Term, New York County,

October 15, 1953.

*Lipkowitz, Plant <$> Lewis*for defendants.

*John F. Davidson*for plaintiff.

Irving L. Levey, J.

Plaintiff seeks recovery for services alleged to have been rendered to the defendant Schlemmer in connection with “ endeavoring to procure and procuring a purchaser for certain personal property owned by said defendant ”, consisting of a stock interest in a business.

Admittedly, there was no written contract or memorandum between the parties, and the plaintiff, apparently with this in mind, attempts now to establish his claim on the basis of an implied contract to pay the reasonable value of his services.

Unfortunately for the plaintiff, however, subdivision 10, of section 31 of the Personal Property Law, as amended as recently as 1949, acts as an effective bar to success in his behalf.

To permit recovery on the theory advanced by the plaintiff would, in effect, nullify the purposes of the statute, the language of which is so clear and unambiguous that it warrants not the slightest deviation.

Even the recommendation of the Law Revision Commission in urging its enactment explicitly indicated the intent of the section: *“*Its purpose is to provide that contracts or agreements for the compensation of business brokers must be evidenced by a memorandum in writing and signed by the party to be charged.” (1949 Report of N. T. Law Revision Commission, p. 613.)

Accordingly, the motion for summary judgment is granted.
Figure 1.

Full-time Employment in the Past 12 Months by TANF and Poverty Status:

2006 and 2009

Notes: This analysis includes only families with children under age 18. For information on confidentiality protection and sampling

and nonsampling error, see <http://www.census.gov/sipp/source.html>.

Source: U.S. Census Bureau, Survey of Income and Program Participation (SIPP), 2004 Panel Waves 6–8, 2008 Panel Waves 1–3.

In percent

0

20

40

60

80

100

No full-time employment Full-time employment 1–11 months Full-time employment all 12 months

All families TANF families Poor non-TANF families Other non-TANF families

2006 2009 2006 2009 2006 2009 2006 2009
#### William STACY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 69-298.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Sept. 25, 1970.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

**In the Matter of**

**CALVIN ARTHUR JONES**

**PETITION FOR REINSTATEMENT FROM INACTIVE STATUS**  **: :**  **: :**  **: :**  **: No. 73 DB 2016 (No. 51 RST 2016)** 

**Attorney Registration No. 65523** 

**(Bucks County)**

O R D E R

PER CURIAM

AND NOW **, this 1 st**  **day of July, 2016, the Report and Recommendation of Disciplinary Board Member dated June 23, 2016, is appro**  **ved and it is ORDERED that Calvin Arthur Jones, who has been on Inactive Status, ha**  **s never been suspended or disbarred, and has demonstrated that he has the moral**  **qualifications, competency and learning in law required for admission to practice in**  **the Commonwealth, shall be and is, hereby reinstated to active status as a member of the Ba**  **r of this Commonwealth. The expenses incurred by the Board in the investigation and**  **processing of this matter shall be paid by the Petitioner.**
#### In re BREVARD COUNTY GRAND JURY INTERIM REPORT, FALL TERM 1970.

No. 41356.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Nov. 4, 1971.

Certiorari denied. 249 So.2d 709.

ROBERTS, C. J., and ADKINS, BOYD, McCAIN and DEKLE, JJ., concur.
### SERVED DECEMBER 7, 2012

In The Matter Of: DocketNo. FAA-2012-0020 BRENDAN AIRWAYS, LLC, ) ) ) ) ) Case No. 2011 EA 170024 Respondent



### ORDERDISMISSING PROCEEDING

On December 6, 2012, the Complainant, the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), filed an Agency's Withdrawal ofComplaint. There is a Motion Conference and a Hearing currently set in this matter.



### It

### Is Hereby Ordered:

1) The December 18,2012 Telephone Motion Conference, set for 11:00am12:00pm EST, is cancelled.

2) The Hearing set onApril 9, 2013 and April10, 2013 inthe Philadelphia, Pennsylvania area is cancelled. ·
3) Pursuant to 14 C.F.R. §13.215, the Complainant, the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), has Withdrawn its Complaint, and this proceedingis dismissed withprejudice.

Attachment: Service List

### SERVICE LIST- BY U.S. MAIL

ORIGINAL.& ONE COPY

Federal Aviation Administration 800 Independence Avenue, S.W. Washington, DC 20591 Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430, Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2W10001

·Mr. Zachary M. Berman, Esq.



### Complainant's Counsel Office ofthe Regional Counsel, ASO-7 Eastern Region Federal Aviation Administration 1Aviation Plaza Jamaica, NY 11434 TEL: 718-553-3258 FAX: 718-995.:5699

Mr. Jason Dickstein, Esq. 

### Respondent's Counsel Washington Aviation Group 2233 Wisconsin Avenue, N.W., #503 .Washington, DC 20007 TEL: 202 628-6776 FAX:**202-628~8948**

JudgeJ.R Sullivan 

### US. Administrative LawJudge Office ofHearings, M-20 U.S. Department ofTransportation 1200 NewJersey Avenue, S.E. (E11-310) Washington, DC 20590 TEL: 202-366-2132 FAX: 202-366-7536 

### ONE COPY FDMS NO. FAA-2012-0020 (Civil Penalty Action)

1 Service was byU.S. Mail. For service in person or by expedited courier, use the following address: Federal Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2W1000, Washington, DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430.