alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Commerce

###### Foreign-Trade Zones Board

          - [B-27-2018]

On April 6, 2018, Albany Safran Composites LLC (ASC), submitted a notification of proposed production activity to the FTZ Board for its facility within FTZ 81, in Rochester, New Hampshire. There is an application pending for FTZ designation at the ASC facility under FTZ 81 (FTZ Docket S-97-2018).

                    The notification was processed in accordance with the regulations of the FTZ Board (15 CFR part 400), including notice in the                     **Federal Register**                     inviting public comment (83 FR 17644, April 23, 2018). On August 6, 2018, the applicant was notified of the FTZ Board's decision that no further review of the activity is warranted at this time. The production activity described in the notification was authorized, subject to the FTZ Act and the FTZ Board's regulations, including Section 400.14.                

Dated: August 8, 2018.

Elizabeth Whiteman,

Acting Executive Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2018-17415 Filed 8-13-18; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk's Office, Atlanta, September 20, 2024.

I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes 

of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto 

affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Court of Appeals 

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA, September 20, 2024

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order

A25I0030. LINDA LYLE HAMBY et al v. STEVEN L. MORTON.

Upon consideration of the Application for Interlocutory Appeal, it is ordered that it be 

hereby DENIED.

LC NUMBERS:

20A03796
103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 3186

AN ACT

To designate the United States courthouse located

Jr., United States Courthouse’’.in Houma, Louisiana, as the ‘‘George Arceneaux,
103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 3186

AN ACT

To designate the United States courthouse located in Houma,

Louisiana, as the ‘‘George Arceneaux, Jr., United States

Courthouse’’.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

4 The United States courthouse located at 800 East

5 Main Street in Houma, Louisiana, is designated as the

6 ‘‘George Arceneaux, Jr., United States Courthouse’’.
2

•HR 3186 EH

1 SEC. 2. LEGAL REFERENCES.

2 Any reference in a law, regulation, document, record,

3 map, or other paper of the United States to the courthouse

4 referred to in section 1 is deemed to be a reference to

5 the ‘‘George Arceneaux, Jr., United States Courthouse’’.

Passed the House of Representatives November 15,

1993.

Attest:

Clerk.
#### Mrs. Mary John KIMBROUGH v. The L. B. LAMPTON COMPANY, a corporation, and Harlan T. Buckalew.

No. 47198.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

Oct. 1, 1973.

Maxey, Clark & Casey Laurel, John K. Keyes, A. A. Calhoun, Collins, for appellant.

Gibbes, Graves, Mullins & Bullock, Laurel, for appellees.

GILLESPIE, Chief Justice:

Mrs. Mary John Kimbrough sued The Lampton Company and its driver, Bucka-lew, in the Circuit Court of Jones County to recover for personal injuries sustained in a motor vehicle collision. The jury found for the defendant and Mrs. Kim-brough appealed to this Court.

Buckalew, driving Lampton’s truck south on Highway 28, approached the intersection with Highway 84 about the same time Mrs. Kimbrough approached the intersection traveling from the west on Highway 84. The vehicles collided, and Mrs. Kim-brough was injured. The evidence was *600sharply conflicting, resulting in a serious factual issue for the jury. In our view of the case, the only question requiring discussion is whether the trial court erred in granting over plaintiff’s objection defendant’s instruction No. 9. The instruction stated:

> [Tjhat the driver of a motor vehicle does not have the right to a clear and unobstructed highway, but must constantly keep the automobile being then and there driven by her under control, must continue on the alert, must keep a proper lookout ahead and anticipate the presence of other persons and vehicles upon said highway and must, at all times, drive her motor vehicle at such a rate of speed to enable her to avoid injury to such person, when they come, or by the exercise of ordinary care, would come within her vision or under her observation.

It instructed the jury to find for the defendant if Mrs. Kimbrough “failed to observe the aforesaid duties,” and if such failure, if any, was the sole cause of the accident.

Substantially the same instruction was disapproved in Stewart v. White, 220 So.2d 271 (Miss.1969), and held to be reversible error in Jones v. Phillips, 263 So.2d 759 (Miss.1972). The instruction complained of is erroneous for the reasons stated in the two cited cases, and we find it to be reversible error in the present case.

Reversed and remanded.

PATTERSON, SMITH, ROBERTSON and SUGG, JJ., concur.
#### Randy HOLMES, by and through his father and next best friend, Loran M. Holmes and Loran M. Holmes, individually, Appellants, v. Wiley BROOKS et al., Appellees.

No. 71-1155.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Nov. 3, 1972.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed.
#### Neil M. THORN, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

No. 43636.

Supreme Court of Florida.

June 7, 1973.

Certiorari denied. 273 So.2d 807.

CARLTON, C. J., and ROBERTS, BOYD, McCAIN and DEKLE, JJ., concur.
#### Rachael Hotard THOMASON v. Hugh Montgomery THOMASON, III.

No. 60639.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Oct. 26, 1977.

In re: Rachael Hotard Thomason, applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, Parish of Tangipahoa, 349 So.2d 928.

Granted.

It is ordered that the writ of review issue; that the Court of Appeal send up the record in duplicate of the case; and that counsel for plaintiff and defendant be notified.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 20-6120

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

MICHAEL KENNY CARTER, a/k/a Blaze,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at 

Columbia. J. Michelle Childs, District Judge. (3:17-cr-00351-JMC-1; 3:18-cv-02707-

JMC)

Submitted: June 16, 2020 Decided: June 19, 2020

Before MOTZ and KING, Circuit Judges, and SHEDD, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Michael Kenny Carter, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Michael Kenny Carter seeks to appeal the district court’s orders denying relief on

his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2018) motion and his Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e) motion. The orders are

not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. See 28 

U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B) (2018). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a 

substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2018). 

When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by 

demonstrating that reasonable jurists could find the district court’s assessment of the 

constitutional claims debatable or wrong. See Buck v. Davis, 137 S. Ct. 759, 773-74 (2017). 

When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate 

both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable and that the motion states a 

debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Gonzalez v. Thaler, 565 U.S. 134, 

140-41 (2012) (citing Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000)). 

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Carter has not made 

the requisite showing. Accordingly, although we grant Carter’s motion to supplement his 

motion for a certificate of appealability, we deny the motion for a certificate of 

appealability and dismiss the appeal. Carter’s motion to remove the case from abeyance is 

denied because the case is not in abeyance. We dispense with oral argument because the 

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and 

argument would not aid the decisional process. 

DISMISSED
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 2870

To amend title I of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974

to exempt from preemption under such title certain provisions of the

law of the State of Washington relating to health plans.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

AUGUST 4, 1993

Mr. KREIDLER (for himself, Mr. SWIFT, Mr. DICKS, Ms. CANTWELL, and Mrs.

UNSOELD) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Education and Labor

A BILL

To amend title I of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 to exempt from preemption under such

title certain provisions of the law of the State of Washington relating to health plans.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Washington State

5 Health Services Reform Enabling Act of 1993’’.
2

•HR 2870 IH

1 SEC. 2. EXEMPTION FROM ERISA PREEMPTION OF CERTAIN

2 PROVISIONS OF THE LAW OF THE STATE OF

3 WASHINGTON RELATING TO HEALTH PLANS.

4 Section 514(b) of the Employee Retirement Income

5 Security Act of 1974 (29 U.S.C. 1144(b)) is amended by

6 adding at the end the following new paragraph:

7 ‘‘(9) Subsection (a) of this section shall not apply to

8 the following provisions of the law of the State of Wash9 ington—

10 ‘‘(A) section 212 of Chapter 492, Laws of 1993

11 (relating to enrollment of certain employees in the

12 Washington basic health plan);

13 ‘‘(B) sections 301 and 304 of Chapter 492,

14 Laws of 1993 (relating to taxation of premiums and

15 hospitals);

16 ‘‘(C) sections 406(7) and 454 of Chapter 492,

17 Laws of 1993 (relating to medical risk adjustment

18 mechanisms);

19 ‘‘(D) section 427 of Chapter 492, Laws of 1993

20 (relating to benefits required to be offered by reg21 istered employer health plans);

22 ‘‘(E) section 430 of Chapter 492, Laws of 1993

23 (relating to requirements applicable to registered

24 employer health plans); and

25 ‘‘(F) section 464 of Chapter 492, Laws of

26 1993, as amended by section 3 of Chapter 494,
3

•HR 2870 IH

1 Laws of 1993 (relating to requirements that employ2 ers offer and pay a portion of the costs of employee

3 health care coverage).’’.

Æ
Exhibit 10.1


[Branch Banking and Trust Company Letterhead]







October 31, 2016







Mr. Emmett Pepe


Chief Financial Officer


GSE Systems, Inc.


1332 Londontown Blvd.


Sykesville, MD 21784







Dear Emmett:







The purpose of this letter is to confirm that the Bank has agreed to the following:







The Bank has agreed to extend the Revolving Credit Expiration Date until March 31, 2017, as defined in the Master Loan and Security Agreement dated November 22, 2011 in Section 1.1(a), by and among GSE Systems, Inc. and GSE Performance Solutions (collectively, the Co-Borrowers) and Branch Banking and Trust Company (successor by merger to Susquehanna Bank).







Respectfully,


Robert P Whelen, Jr.


Senior Vice President


Tel (410) 230-1073
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

HECTOR MARTINEZ

,

Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS

,

State

. '

'

'

'

'

' No. 08

- 1 3

- 00 363

- CR

Appeal from the

409 th District Court

of El Paso County, Texas

(TC# 20100D00750 )

O R D E R

The Court GRANTS the Appellant ’ s third motion for extension of time to file the brief

until December 4 , 201 4

. NO FURTHER MOTIONS FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE

THE APPELLANT ’ S BRIEF WILL BE CONSIDERED BY THIS COURT.

It is further ORDERED that the Hon. Ruben P. Morales

, the Appellant ’ s Attorney

,

prepare the Appellant ’ s brief and forward the same to this Court on or before December 4 , 201 4

.

IT IS SO ORDE RED this 2 2 nd day of October , 2014

.

PER CURIAM
U.S. flag
              An official website of the United States government Skip to main content   end of header Census.gov Newsroom Releases 2010 Census
 Newsroom Archive
 Skip left menu navigation
 About the Newsroom
 				Facts for Features
 				**News Releases**
 				Press Kits
 				Tip Sheets
 Release Information CB09-CN.15 **Contact:**  Public Information Office
(301) 763-3030 (phone)
(301) 763-3762 (fax)
(301) 457-1037 (TDD)PIO@census.gov
 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:  MONDAY, JULY 20, 2009 2010 Census Promotional Videos Win Numerous Awards A series of 2010 Census promotional videos have won several prestigious Telly Awards as well as a Videographer Award of Excellence -- awards that honor the best in video production. The videos were produced by the Public Information Office at the U.S. Census Bureau as part of a collaborative effort between headquarters, regional and contracting staff. They were submitted for consideration by contractors Therese Allen and Corey Petree. The four- to seven-minute videos, titled "A New Portrait of America," were produced to reach different segments of the population including the general, African-American, Asian, Hispanic, Native American/Alaska Native, Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islanders, and Puerto Rican audiences. In the nonbroadcast productions category, the videos received silver Tellys for use of music and editing, and a bronze Telly was awarded for government relations. In the Internet/online video category, a silver Telly was awarded for music and a bronze Telly was awarded for editing. The videos also received the 2009 Videographer Award of Excellence in the government/federal and creativity/video/original music categories. The "New Portrait of America" videos include diverse images from throughout the country as well as interviews with community leaders. They are used at activities and events to promote the 2010 Census and encourage everyone's participation in next year's national count. The "New Portrait of America" videos may be  viewed at the following link: <http://2010.census.gov/mediacenter/>. **ABOUT THE 2010 CENSUS** The 2010 Census is a count of everyone living in  the United States and is mandated by the U.S. Constitution. Census data are  used to distribute congressional seats to states, to distribute more than $435  billion in federal funds to local, state and tribal governments each year and  to make decisions about what community services to provide. The 2010 Census  questionnaire will be one of the shortest in history, consisting of 10  questions and taking about 10 minutes to complete. Strict laws protect the  confidentiality of respondents and the information they provide.
  CONNECT WITH US

Information Quality
                    Data Linkage Infrastructure
                    Data Protection and Privacy Policy
                    Accessibility      
                    FOIA
                    Inspector General
                    No FEAR Act
                    U.S. Department of Commerce
                    USA.gov
                   Measuring America's People, Places, and Economy
Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h

Elizabeth A. Weave r

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathaway,

J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk March 19, 2010

jam 

# Order

March 19, 2010

140212

MICHAEL D. RAINEY,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v SC: 140212

CoA: 294360

DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS,

Defendant-Appellee.

___________________ ________________

On order of the Chief Justice, plai ntiff-appellant having failed to pay the partial filing fee as required by the order of January 22, 2010, the Clerk of the Court is hereby directed to close this file.
#### INTERCOASTAL DRYDOCK, INC. v. STATE ROAD DEPARTMENT.

No. 36988.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Feb. 1968.

Certiorari denied without opinion. 203 So.2d 19.
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 3140

To authorize the Secretary of Transportation to issue a certificate of documentation with appropriate endorsements for employment in the coastwise trade and on the Great Lakes for the vessel MARINE STAR.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

SEPTEMBER 27, 1993

Mr. CALLAHAN introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Merchant Marine and Fisheries

A BILL

To authorize the Secretary of Transportation to issue a

certificate of documentation with appropriate endorsements for employment in the coastwise trade and on

the Great Lakes for the vessel MARINE STAR.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That notwithstanding section 27 of the Merchant Marine

4 Act, 1920 (46 App. U.S.C. 883), the Act of June 19, 1986

5 (46 App. U.S.C. 289), and sections 12106 and 12107 of

6 title 46, United States Code, the Secretary of Transpor7 tation may issue a certificate of documentation with the

8 appropriate endorsements for employment in the coastwise
2

HR 3140 IH

1 trade of the United States and on the Great Lakes for

2 the marine vessel MARINE STAR (Official Number

3 248329).

Æ
## 

EXHIBIT 23

Consent of Independent Accountants

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (No. 33-28779, No. 33-29304 and No. 333-32030) of Teltone Corporation of our report
dated July 19, 2000, except for Note 6 for which the date is August 10, 2000, relating to the financial statements appearing in this Form 10-KSB.

/s/
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

PricewaterhouseCoopers
LLP
Seattle, Washington
September 18, 2000

---

## QuickLinks
##### 



Exhibit 32.2

Certification of Chief Financial Officer (1)

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as created by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the following certification is being made to
accompany the Registrants Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended
August 2, 2003:

In connection with the Annual Report of Del Global Technologies Corp. (the
Company) on Form 10-
K for the fiscal year ended August 2, 2003 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Thomas V. Gilboy,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350,
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that to my
knowledge:



| | (1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
as amended; and
| | --- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
| | (2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the Company.     

|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ Thomas V. Gilboy   
|                       
|Name: Thomas V. Gilboy 
|Chief Financial Officer
|Date: November 3, 2003 



| | (1) |  | A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906
has been provided to Del Global Technologies Corp and will be retained
by Del Global Technologies Corp. and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
| | --- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
| |     |  | The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a
separate disclosure document.                                                                                   

-62-
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                              3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                          11,239
<SECURITIES>                                     3,478
<RECEIVABLES>                                    5,031
<ALLOWANCES>                                       493
<INVENTORY>                                      6,933
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                26,854
<PP&E>                                          17,890
<DEPRECIATION>                                   9,319
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  36,051
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            9,785
<BONDS>                                          2,183
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            88
<OTHER-SE>                                      23,995
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    24,083
<SALES>                                          7,822
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 8,494
<CGS>                                            4,703
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    4,703
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 3,830
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 128
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     77
<INCOME-TAX>                                        10
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 67
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                        67
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.01
        

</TABLE>