STATE OF FLORIDA

STATE BOARD OF CONSERVATION

DIVISION OF GEOLOGY

FLORIDA GEOLOGICAL SURVEY

Robert O. Vernon, Director

REPORT OF INVESTIGATIONS NO. 31

GROUND-WATER RESOURCES

OF

COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA

By

H. J. McCoy

U.S. Geological Survey

Prepared by the

UNITED STATES GEOLOGICAL SURVEY

in cooperation with

COLLIER COUNTY

the

CITY OF NAPLES

and the

FLORIDA GEOLOGICAL SURVEY

Tallahassee

1962
AGRICULTURAL

LIBRARY

FLORIDA STATE BOARD

OF

CONSERVATION

Farris Bryant

Governor

Tom Adams Richard Ervin

Secretary of State Attorney General

J. Edwin Larson Ray E. Green

Treasurer Comptroller

Thomas D. Bailey Doyle Conner

Superintendent of Public Instruction Commissioner of Agriculture

W. Randolph Hodges

Director

ii
LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL

TALLAHASSEE

August 8, 1962

Honorable Farris Bryant, Chairman

Florida State Board of Conservation

Tallahassee, Florida

Dear Governor Bryant:

The Division of Geology is publishing, as Florida Geological Survey

Report of Investigations No. 31, a report on the ground-water resources

of Collier County, prepared by Mr. H. J. McCoy, geologist with the

U. S. Geological Survey, in cooperation with the City of Naples, Collier

County, and this department.

The report recognizes two major aquifers as the source of ground

water in Collier County. The lower aquifer is highly mineralized, but

contains usable water, and the more shallow aquifer is the source of

large supplies, which are utilized by municipalities and domestic users.

Adequate supplies of fresh water are present in the Naples area and by

proper planning, these can be developed in an orderly manner and salt

water encroachment can be prevented.

Respectfully yours,

Robert O. Vernon

Director and State Geologist

iii
Completed manuscript received

July 5, 1962

Published for the Florida Geological Survey

By Rose Printing Company

Tallahassee, Florida

August 8, 1962

iv
CONTENTS

Page

Abstract ___ 1

Introduction 2

Purpose and scope of investigation 2

Previous investigations 2

Well-numbering system 4

Acknowledgments 4

Geography 4

General features 4

Climate 5

Physiography and drainage -__ 6

Geology __ 10

General statement 10

Miocene Series 10

Tampa Formation 10

Hawthorn Formation __ _11

Tamiami Formation ___ _ 12

Pliocene Series __ 13

Caloosahatchee Marl 13

Pleistocene and Recent Series _ 13

Anastasia Formation 13

Fort Thompson Formation __14

Miami Oolite 14

Pleistocene. terraces and Recent deposits 15

Test-well drilling 15

Ground water 16

Principles of occurrence 16

Floridan aquifer _ ___ 17

Piezometric surface - 18

Recharge and discharge 20

Availability and use of ground water -- -- _ _ 22

Shallow aquifer 24

Recharge and discharge 925

Water-level fluctuations 30

Availability and use of ground water - __ 31

Quantitative studies 35

Hydraulics of aquifers 35

Aquifer tests 36

Quality of water 41

Floridan aquifer 4-------- 44

Shallow aquifer 46

Salt-water contamination - 51

Recent and residual enroachment --- 54

Upward leakage 56

Summary 57

References ---- __59

Well logs __-___-_ __--____- - 61

v
ILLUSTRATIONS

Figure Page

1 Florida Peninsula showing location of Collier County - -_ 3

2 Collier County showing location of wells and geologic sections

A-A' and B-B' facing 4

3 Collier County showing the geology exclusive of organic soils facing 6

4 Physiographic regions of Collier County 8

5 Map showing surficial flow in Collier County 9

6 Lithologic cross section along A-A' in figure 2 facing 12

7 Lithologic cross section along line B-B' in figure 2 - facing 14

8 The piezometric surface of the Floridan aquifer, July 6-17, 1961 _-- 19

9 Piezometric surface of the Floridan aquifer in Collier

County, 1960 facing 20

10 Map of Everglades showing location of wells and cross section along

line C-C' _ 21

11 Cross section along line C-C' in figure 10, showing amount of open hole

in wells 23

12 Northwestern Collier County showing locations of the Naples municipal

well fields, and geologic cross sections along lines D-D', E-E', and

F-F' _____ facing 24

13 Geologic cross section and chloride content of water along line D-D' in

figure 12 25

14 Geologic cross section and chloride content of water along line E-E' in

figure 12 26

15 Geologic cross section and chloride content of water along line F-F' in

figure 12 _ 27

16 Hydrograph of well 610-147-14 showing daily high, monthly pumpage

from Naples well field, and daily rainfall at Naples, June 1958-

December 1960 28

17 Hydrographs of wells 606-120-1, 625-116-1, and 617-134-3, and daily

rainfall at Miles City and Lake Trafford, 1960 29

18 Water-level contour map of northwestern Collier County,

August 15, 1960 facing 30

19 Water-level contour map of northwestern Collier County,

March 29, 1960 _ facing 30

20 Graph showing annual pumpage from the Naples well fields, 1945-62 _ 32

21 Naples well field area showing municipal supply wells and observation

weUs - 34

22 Graph showing drawdown in observation wells at the end of the 30-hour

aquifer test, January 9-10, 1959, and sketch showing wells used in the test 37

23 Idealized sketch showing flow in a leaky artesian aquifer system 38

24 Graph showing drawdowns in wells 610-147-9 and 610-147-15 during

aquifer test January 9-10, 1959, and theoretical drawdown for artesian,

water-table, and leaky-aquifer conditions 39

25 Sketch showing wells used in pumping test, April 8-10, 1960, and graph

showing drawdown at end of the 44-hour test 40

26 Drawdown and recovery of water level in well 629-127-3 showing effects

of pumping test, April 8-10, 1960 42

27 Northwestern Collier County showing chloride content of water from

selected wells and surface-water observation points facing 46

28 Idealized sketch of fresh-water and salt-water distribution in an unconfined coastal aquifer to illustrate the Ghyben-Herzberg relation _ 52

29 Sketch showing the fresh-water- salt-water interface according to the

potential theory and the Ghyben-Herzberg principle 53

vi
Table .Page

1 Average monthly temperature at Naples and Everglades, the average

monthly rainfall at Naples, Everglades, Lake Trafford, and Miles City ._ 6

2 Chemical analyses of water from selected wells that penetrate the

Floridan aquifer in Collier County 45

3 Chemical analyses of water from selected wells that penetrate the shallow

aquifer in Collier County _ ______ 47

4 Chloride content in parts per million, from selected wells in northwestern Collier County ____ 48

5 Well records in Collier County, Florida .........-_-_.-.. ....._ 66

vii

GROUND-WATER RESOURCES OF

COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA

By

H. J. McCoy

ABSTRACT

Two major aquifers are the sources of ground-water supplies in Collier

County. 1 The lower is the Floridan aquifer, and wells penetrating it

throughout most of the county will flow. Except in the town of Everglades, where it yields water containing about 800 ppm (parts per

million) of chloride, the Floridan aquifer produces water too highly

mineralized for most purposes. The main producing zones of the Floridan

aquifer in Collier County are the permeable limestones of the Tampa

Formation, of Early Miocene Age, and those in the lower part of the

Hawthorn Formation, of Middle Miocene Age. The fine sand and clay

section in the upper part of the Hawthorn Formation confines the Floridan aquifer. The top of the aquifer is generally about 400 feet below the

land surface.

The chief source of fresh ground water in Collier County is an extensive shallow aquifer which extends from the land surface to a depth

of about 130 feet in the northwestern part of the county, to a depth of

about 90 feet in the southern part, and to a depth of about 60 feet in

the central and northeastern parts. The aquifer thins to a featheredge

along the eastern county boundary.

The permeable zones of the shallow aquifer are the Pamlico Sand

and solution-riddled limestones of the Anastasia Formation, of Pleistocene

Age, and the Tamiami Formation of Late Miocene Age. Semi-confining

layers of marl impede the vertical movement of water within the aquifer.

The shallow ground water in the southern coastal areas contains very

high concentrations of chloride as a result of sea-water encroachment.

The shallow water in the Naples area is of good quality, containing

about 250 ppm of dissolved solids. This is due in part to a high freshwater head adjacent to the coast and the resultant flushing of ground

water. In the areas inland from Naples the ground water contains greater

concentrations of chlorides and dissolved solids, which are due to residual

SThe classification and nomenclature of the rock units conform to the usage of

the Florida Geological Survey and also, except for the Tampa Formation and the

Ocala Group and its subdivisions, to that of the U.S. Geological Survey, which

regards the Tampa as the Tampa Limestone and the Ocala Group as two formations,

the Ocala Limestone and the Inglis Limestone. The Ocala Group as used by the

Florida Geological Survey includes the Crystal River, Williston, and Inglis Formations.

1
2 FLORIDA GEOLOGICAL SURVEY-BULLETIN THITY-ONE

sea water and lack of flushing of the shallow aquifer. In the Immokalee

area, water from the shallow aquifer is potable but its quality varies

considerably with different well depths.

The coefficient of transmissibility of the shallow aquifer in the

Naples area ranges from 92,000 gpd (gallons per day) per foot to 180,000

gpd per foot and the coefficient of storage ranges from 0.001 to 0.004.

In the vicinity of Immokalee the coefficient of transmissibility is about

60,000 gpd per foot and the coefficient of storage is 0.0002.

Adequate supplies of fresh ground water are available in Naples

and vicinity, and these can be developed in an orderly manner to prevent

salt-water encroachment. Controlled drainage of inland areas can provide fresh water to replenish ground-water supplies of coastal areas as

urbanization expands.

INTRODUCTION

PURPOSE AND SCOPE OF INVESTIGATION

Since 1950 the population of the coastal areas of Collier County,

Florida (fig. 1), has increased rapidly. With this increase has come the

need for additional quantities of potable water. Recognizing this, the

Collier County Board of Commissioners, in cooperation with the city of

Naples, requested the U.S. Geological Survey to investigate the groundwater resources of the county. Such an investigation was begun in

November 1959 by the Geological Survey in cooperation with Collier

County. An appreciable part of the data was obtained during a continuing cooperative program begun in 1951 with the city of Naples.

The investigation included the following phases: (1) assembling and

evaluating existing basic data; (2) obtaining data related to the availability and movement of ground water; (3) determining the hydrologic

and geologic characteristics of the subsurface materials; (4) determining

the chemical quality of ground water; and (5) preparing a report of the

results of the investigation.

The investigation was under the general supervision of Philip E. LaMoreaux, former chief of the Ground Water Branch of the Geological

Survey, Washington, D. C., and under the immediate supervision of

M. I. Rorabaugh, district engineer, Tallahassee, and Howard Klein,

geologist, U.S. Geological Survey, Miami, Florida.

PREVIOUS INVESTIGATIONS

Two reports, "Ground-Water Resources of the Naples Area, Collier

County, Florida" in 1954 and "Ground-Water Resources of Northwest

Collier County, Florida" in 1961, summarize the geologic and hydrologic
GROUND-WATER RESOURCES OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 3

S 84' 82* 81a 6 0

s

G E O R G IA >--

S GAD ---- NASSAU I

SEN / r- M HAMILTON

LIBERTY WAKULLA TAYLO I --

SFRANKLIN ,

SIALAOHUA PUTNA DIXIE I ALA PUTtM- FLA GLER

II LUSI29 ---- "----,-- ___----__________ --- .'-- U' • _L- -- 

-________I o . , < CITRUS UKEr LAC , I

HERNANM ORANGE

PASCO r ' ^

F1 o m ~'~... . i^ -,•

O ILLSBOROUGH OSCEOLA-i- t

\ ^I lTe°mapo ) POL K 1

S' NDIAN RIVER

SMANATEE HARDEE OKEEHOBE

HIGHLANDS C

SARA DESOTO F MARTIN

r MEE - 27

CHARLOTTE- GLADES

re i

l

A- -- l---.-^, JLEE HENORY PALM BEACH

BRi A/ 26'

Miami 0

MONROE\ DADE

25 0 A_- 25 50 75 10 Miles

25'

Figure 1. Florida Peninsula showing location of Collier County.
4 FLORIDA GEOLOGICAL SURVEY-BULLETIN THIRTY-ONE

conditions in northwestern Collier County. The U.S. Geological Survey

maintains water-level recording gages in the city of Naples well-field

area, in eastern Collier County near the Broward County boundary, and

east of Immokalee at the Hendry County boundary. Significant parts

of the 1954 and 1960 reports are incorporated in this report because

they pertain to the overall development of water resources .in northwestern Collier County.

WELL-NUMBERING SYSTEM

The well-numbering system used in this report is based on longitude

and latitude coordinates. As shown in figure 2, Collier County has been

divided into quadrangles by a grid of 1-minute parallels (of latitude)

and 1-minute meridians (of longitude). The well numbers were assigned

by their locations within the grid system. Each number consists of three

parts; the first part is the last degree digit and the 2-minute digits of

latitude, on the south side of the 1-minute quadrangle; the second part

is the last degree digit and the 2-minute digits of longitude on the east

side of the quadrangle; the third part is the order in which the well was

inventoried within the quadrangle. The first degree digit of north latitude and west longitude is omitted because all wells have the same

digit. For example, well 609-147-17 designates the 17th well inventoried

in the quadrangle bounded by latitude 26009' on the south and longitude

81047' on the east.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

Appreciation is expressed to Mr. W. H. Turner, Collier County engineer, for his cooperation and courtesy throughout the investigation; to

Mr. W. F. Savidge, Naples Water Plant superintendent, for his cooperation and information concerning ground-water use and proposed wellfield locations for the municipal water supply in and around Naples;

to the Collier Development Corporation for its cooperation in permitting

access to many unused wells on its properties; and to the residents of

Collier County for furnishing information about their wells. Thanks are

extended to the following well drillers of the area for information on the

subsurface geology and the depth, construction, and yield of wells:

Mr. Albert Miller of Fort Myers, Mr. James Whatley of Immokalee, and

Mr. Carl May of Naples.

GEOGRAPHY

GENERAL FEATURES

Collier County comprises 2,032 square miles in the southwestern part

of the Florida Peninsula (fig. 1.) Its population has increased from 6,488
8r52' 50' 45' 40' 35' 30' 25' 20' 15' 10 05' 8100' 55' 80°50' 26 '34 1 1 1 I I I I I I I I I I I 26034' --- BI ' 8* 81 11,46874 _313 .... • -'26"11 --

- - 20 HEND1RY COUNTY23

141 o a . 30'

EXPLANATION 4 26 i

I ' I 2ý .2 1.[ 3

Well and well number '" 272'6 S z5-5f

A A' -- -- l 2 INSET, B -

Line of 'ection C U N Y 1 1 E i IAN , 

a- ., 26"09,

0 1 2 3 4 5miles COUNTY e o 25'

.8140 81"39'

·P25'564 F.2 

.1- 22 20

- 22

LEED4.R C SINSET U T y20 C

GC 0 LI E R4

INSE . .26-07- 1 

3 SU NILAND D Y C O UN T

0 O L I E R C O UN Y .T

I K __ _ I _ -- --- D ii i \ - -I --- I_ -^ - --- 0

Id IZZ

LES

OO - -- 

i L 

KlceF a S o Islard ^ ||5IsF - c ^_ 2^Sf z^I I IIISET 0,7 a L)

F e 2 or l Cy toTi n 

l o e

Figure< 2A. an B oB' A-A' and B-B'

/J ^if^ggg^^,' :AA4 0 L.o LLI E R ---- ------ ^-C 0 U N T V

/ 0 0 E N c C O U I Y 

25*45 I I I ' II 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I I I 25,45. 81r52' 50' 45' 40' 35' 30' 25 20' 15' 10' 05' 81°00' 55' 80°50'

Base taken from mops of the Florida State Road Department

Figure 2. Collier County showing location of wells and geologic sections

A-A' and B-B'
GROUND-WATER RESOURCES OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 5

in 1950 to 15,753 in 1960, more than half of which is in the three principal

towns. Naples (fig. 2) has a population of 4,650, and its suburbs to the

north and east increase this figure to more than 9,000. During each winter

season a large number of tourists visit this coastal area. Immokalee has

a population of 4,800, which is increased periodically by the influx of

migrant farm laborers. The town of Everglades has decreased in population from 800 in 1950 to 550 in 1960.

The principal occupation of the county is truck farming. The most

important crops are tomatoes, cucumbers, peppers, and watermelons.

Cattle raising is carried on also. Tourism is important to the economy of

the area, particularly the coastal towns of Naples and Everglades. Oil

production adds considerably to the economy, as the only producing oil

field in Florida is located at Sunniland in central Collier County (fig. 2).

Quarrying of limestone for road and building materials is also a sizable

industry.

There are three major roads in Collier County (fig. 2); the Tamiani

Trail (U.S. Highway 41) is the main arterial road through the county.

State Highway 29 connects Everglades with Immokalee and Immokalee

with northern towns; and State Highway 846 connects Naples with Immokalee and Immokalee with eastern towns. There are several unimproved roads, but a large part of the interior of the county can be reached

only by specially equipped vehicles.

CLIMATE

The climate of Collier County is humid subtropical but temperatures

are moderated by winds from the Gulf of Mexico and the Atlantic

Ocean. Table 1 shows temperature and rainfall averages at weather stations within the county. The average annual temperature for coastal

Collier County is approximately 750 F. The warmest months are usually

July and August. The humidity is high but frequent afternoon thundershowers prevent extremely high temperatures.

Rainfall records from the Naples, Everglades, and Lake Trafford

stations show that there is not a significant variation in the average

annual rainfall throughout much of the county, but that large differences

do occur during a single year. During the very wet year of 1959 the

Miles City station recorded 88.76 inches of rainfall, the greatest yearly

rainfall of record in the county, whereas the station at Everglades recorded 64.29 inches. That year also established a new high for Naples,

where 72.50 inches was recorded. Several dry years occurred during

which less than 35 inches fell.
6 FLORIDA GEOLOGICAL SURVEY-BULLETIN THITY-ONE

TABLE 1. Average Monthly Temperature at Naples and Everglades, and

Average Monthly Rainfall at Naples, Everglades,

Lake Trafford, and Miles City

Temperature (*F)* Rainfall (inches)t

Month

Lake

Naples Everglades Naples Everglades Trafford Miles City

January......... 65.9 67.0 1.50 1.58 1.48 2.83

February....... 67.3 67.5 1.49 1.43 1.93 2.53

March......... 72.1 70.4 2.28 2.21 2.83 4.41

April........... 74.1 73.9 2.54 2.63 2.79 3.39

May........... 77.3 77.5 4.15 4.63 5.02 8.15

June........... 81.3 81.0 7.81 8.87 6.29 9.64

July........... 82.7 82.2 8.65 8.40 7.94 10.29

August......... 83.3 82.9 7.97 7.27 6.87 8.54

September...... 82.3 82.1 9.93 9.75 8.99 9.46

October........ 77.4 78.2 5.77 4.24 6.19 7.16

November...... 71.9 72.1 1.51 1.24 1.28 1.38

December...... 67.3 68.2 1.27 1.35 2.05 2.32

Yearly average.. 75.1 75.2 54.84 53.78 53.86 74.06

* Period of record, US. Weather Bureau, Naples, 1942-60; Everglades, 1926-60.

" Period of record, U.S. Weather Bureau, Naples, 1943-60; Everglades, 1926-60; Lake Trafford, 1951-60: and Miles City. 1957-60.

PHYSIOGRAPHY AND DRAINAGE

Collier County lies within the Atlantic Coastal Plain physiographic

province (Meinzer, 1923, pl. 28). It is part of the Terraced Coastal

Lowlands physiographic region of Florida as subdivided by Puri and

Vernon (1959, p. 7, fig. 3).

The Terraced Coastal Lowlands were formed during the interglacial

stages of the Pleistocene Epoch, when sea level was much higher than

it is today and Florida was nearly covered by the ocean. When the sea remained relatively stationary for a long period, current and wave action

developed relatively flat surfaces on the ocean floor. During the glacial

stages the sea retreated and the flat surfaces emerged as marine terraces

which had gentle seaward dips. Wave action at the inland margin of

the sea would generally cut a scarp or bench into the abutting landmass,

leaving a well-defined shoreline when the sea retreated. In many places,

however, either wave-cut benches were not formed or they were masked

by later deposition or the growth of vegetation.

..
EXPLANATION

N I I

Pamlico Sand

Talbot Formation z

Miami Oolite

0 10 miles

Ft, Thompson Formation

.* *. .

|'s Anastasia Formation

- 4/ Caloosahatchee Marl <

Immokalee ', H

S_ Tamiami Formation H

Napl es

Everglades

Figure 8, Collier County showing the geology exclusive of organic soils,
GROUND-WATER RESOURCES OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 7

Cooke (1945, p. 245-248; 273-311) recognized seven terraces representing seven stands of the sea during Pleistocene time. Of these terraces

only the lowest two are within the surface altitudes of Collier County:

the Pamlico terrace at 25 feet above msl (mean sea level) and the

Talbot terrace at 25-42 feet above msl. Parker and Cooke (1944, p.24)

included a still lower shoreline, called Silver Bluff terrace, which is

recognizable along Biscayne Bay in Miami, Florida, where it cuts into

the rock at an altitude of 5 feet.

The writer was unable to distinguish any field evidence of the ancient

shorelines in Collier County. However, from aerial photographs and

topographic maps, a part of the Pamlico shoreline can be traced which

correlates with that of Parker and Cooke (1944, pl. 14). Parker and

Cooke (p. 26) indicated that during Pamlico time, while most of south

Florida was covered by the sea, an island existed south of the Caloosahatchee River. This island was probably a remnant of the Talbot terrace

which stood between 25 and 42 feet above sea level. As can be seen

in figure 8, only a small part of the island extended into Collier County.

This island was referred to as Immokalee Island by Parker, et al.,

(1955, p. 189).

During the last glacial stage of the Pleistocene, the sea retreated to

about 25 feet below its present level and left many parallel beach ridges

and bars in southern Florida. Sand was transported southward beyond

Everglades and Marco Island and dunes were formed. Sand dunes are

the foundations of many of the islands in the Ten Thousand Islands area,

and the top of one dune on Marco Island stands 52 feet above sea level,

the highest land point in Collier County (Parker and Cooke, 1944, p. 26).

Davis (1943, fig. 1) divided Collier County into three physiographic

regions: the Flatlands, the Big Cypress Swamp, and the Southwest Coast

and Ten Thousand Islands (fig. 4). The Flatlands region contains a

great number of marshes and swamps, cypress stands, and open-water

depressions. These include the Corkscrew Marsh, Lake Trafford, and

the Okaloacoochee Slough (fig. 5). Numerous embayments, lagoons,

creeks, and rivers occur in this region along the Gulf of Mexico. The Big

Cypress Swamp covers the flat, poorly drained central and eastern parts

of the county and is characterized by swamps containing large cypress

trees, islands of pine forests, and wet marl prairies. Most of the region

is less than 15 feet above sea level. The Southwest Coast and Ten

Thousand Islands has many tidal streams, bays, lagoons, and thousands

of shoal-water islands. Much of the area is covered by mangrove swamps

and salt-water marshes.

Drainage in Collier County is sluggish, because of the general flat

topography, and is mainly through the interconnected sloughs (fig. 5).
8 FLORIDA GEOLOGICAL SURVEY-BULLETN TIRTY-ONE

N

F L A T L A N S o miles 0 10 miles

Figure 4. Physiographic regions of Collier County.

There are many creeks and rivers along the coastline, but they do not

extend great distances inland. The principal drainage channels are the

Gordon River at Naples, the Barron River at Everglades, the Turner

River east of Everglades, and the Cocohatchee River in the northwestern

part of the county. Major canal construction has extended the drainage

of the Cocohatchee and Barron rivers considerable distances inland.

The digging of several major canals has altered the natural drainage

to some extent. The canal adjacent to the Tamiami Trail (U.S. Highway

41) acts chiefly to collect southward runoff from the Big Cypress Swamp

and distribute the water to the nearest outlets beneath the highway. It

has little effect on drainage except in areas where it joins streams that

discharge to the gulf, such as the Barron and Turner rivers. The recently

constructed borrow canals adjacent to State Highways 858 and 846
GROUND-WATER RESOURCES OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 9

EXPLANATION

I mmokolee SDirection of surficiol flow

Naples

1IN

7 --_miles, - 'E _ 4ld10 

Figure 5. Surficial flow in Collier County.

constitute the beginning of a program of drainage and development in

northwestern Collier County. The canal adjacent to State Highway 846

connects with the Cocohatchee River and extends more than 12 miles

inland into frequently flooded areas, where land-surface elevations in

places exceed 15 feet.

The Barron River Canal probably diverts a sizable amount of water

from the Fakawatchee Swamp. Drainage in eastern and west-central

Collier County is so poor that the area remains flooded for long periods

after the end of each rainy season.

Deep Lake, one of five sinkhole lakes in southern Florida (Parker

and Cooke, 1944, p. 44) is just east of State Highway 29, and about 14

miles north of Everglades (fig. 2). It has vertical or overhanging sides to

depths ranging from 35 to 50 feet, below which it slopes gradually to

its deepest point of 95 feet. It resulted from underground solution and

collapse of limestone.
10 FLORIDA GEOLOGICAL SURVEY-BULLETIN THIRTY-ONE

GEOLOGY

GENERAL STATEMENT

The peninsula of Florida is an emerged part of a large extension of

the ancient continental landmass. The extension is called the Floridian

Plateau (Vaughan, 1910). The core of this plateau is formed of igneous

and metamorphic rocks known as the basement complex. Sedimentary

rocks overlying the core range in thickness from about 4,000 feet near the

center of the peninsula to more than 12,000 feet in Collier County

(Parker and Cooke, 1944, p. 18). The predominant materials in this

county to a depth of about 700 feet are sand, limestone, and clay; below

700 feet the rocks are chiefly limestone and dolomite.

The only producing oil field in Florida is located in Collier County,

near Sunniland (fig. 2). Oil was discovered at a depth of 11,626 feet,

where it is trapped in structural folds within the sediments of Trinity

Age in the Lower Cretaceous Series. The discovery well was completed

on September, 26, 1943, but was later abandoned. Additional wells were

drilled and the field is still producing. Oil-exploration wells drilled in

Collier County furnish valuable information for the study of the deep

structures and stratigraphy of southern Florida.

Rocks of Miocene Age and younger are the only materials in Collier

County that will yield water suitable for irrigation, municipal, or domestic purposes. Older rocks of Oligocene and Eocene Age yield large

quantities of water to deep flowing wells, but the water is too highly

mineralized for ordinary uses. Therefore, only those formations that yield

water of fair to good quality or in usable quantities will be described here

in detail.

MIOCENE SERIES

TAMPA FORMATION

Cooke (1945, p. 111-115) defined the Tampa Formation as the Lower

Miocene sandy limestones that overlie the Suwannee Limestone of Oligocene Age and grade upward into the younger Hawthorn Formation.

In Collier County, the Tampa Formation is represented primarily by a

sandy limestone or a calcareous sandstone. The sand is predominantly

quartz and occurs in pockets or thin beds, or is disseminated in the

limestone matrix. In well cuttings, the limestone varies from a dirty buff

color to a very light color. Some phosphatic material is associated with

the Tampa Formation in Collier County.

In oil-exploratory wells in the central part of the county, the Tampa

Formation is approximately 200 feet thick. In one well, near Sunniland,

J
GROUIND-WATER RESOURCES OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 11

the top of the Tampa Formation was reached at a depth of 411 feet.

In well 609-115-1, 5 miles east of Miles City, the Tampa Formation

was penetrated in the interval between 400 and 578 feet below land

surface. In well 556-128-1 on the southern mainland and well 554-143-1

on Marco Island, the Tampa Formation was reached at depths of 376

and 350 feet, respectively. Several flowing wells in the Naples area

probably are of sufficient depth to penetrate the Tampa Formation, but

no record of the well cuttings is available. The 300-foot test well

616-141-2, 82 miles northeast of Naples, did not reach the Tampa

Formation (fig. 6).

In Collier County, the limestones of the Tampa Formation probably

are the chief source of the water yielded by flowing wells which penetrate the upper part of the Floridan aquifer, the principal artesian

system that underlies Florida (Parker, 1951, p. 831).

HAWTHORN FORMATION

The Middle Miocene Hawthorn Formation in Collier County overlies

the Tampa Formation and underlies the Tamiami Formation of Late

Miocene Age. It is composed predominantly of clay but it contains also

stringers or lenses of sand and gravel and thin layers of limestone and

shells. The limestones generally occur near the bottom of the formation.

The clay and sandy clay in the formation are relatively impermeable.

In places they resemble commercial modeling clay. Because of the characteristic low permeability of the clay, the Hawthorn Formation forms

the main part of the confining section that caps the Floridan aquifer.

The boundary between the green clay of the Hawthorn Formation

and the gray-green silty, sandy clays of the overlying Tamiami Formation is very difficult, if not impossible, to determine from fossils. Lithologic

differences cannot be used to differentiate because there appears to

be a gradational zone between the Hawthorn Formation and the Tamiami Formation (figs. 6, 7). However, it is estimated by the author that

the Hawthorn Formation in Collier County ranges in thickness from

about 250 to 300 feet, and that the top of the formation ranges in depth

from less than 100 feet in the Sunniland-Immokalee area to more than

200 feet along the western coastal areas. Figure 7 shows the subsurface

lithology along line B-B' in figure 2.

Parker, et al., (1955, p. 84) stated that artesian wells penetrating

limestones in the lower part of the Hawthorn Formation in coastal

Collier County have water levels that correspond with those of deeper

wells. This indicates that the lower limestones of the Hawthorn Formation
12 FLORDA GEOLOGICAL SURVEY-BULLETIN THIRTY-ONE

are interconnected with the main body of limestones of the Floridan

aquifer and they may be considered the top of the aquifer. However,

some of these wells probably extend into the Tampa Formation in order

that adequate yield may be obtained.

Information obtained by Klein (1954, p. 22) has shown that soft

limestones in the Hawthorn Formation at depths of 200 to 250 feet in the

Naples area yield low to moderate quantities of water. Wells tapping

these beds have water levels considerably lower than those of deeper

wells, and the contained water is more saline than water from the Floridan aquifer. These relatively shallow limestones probably constitute a

separate artesian system.

TAMIAMI FORMATION

The Tamiami Formation as defined by Parker (1955, p. 85) includes

all the Upper Miocene deposits in southern Florida. It underlies nearly

all of Collier County (fig. 8), and in the southern and eastern parts of

the county it is exposed at the surface or is covered by a thin veneer of

7gnger deposits. Parker (1955, p. 85) indicated that the formation has

a maximum thickness of about 150 feet in southern Florida. The exact

thicknesses of the formation were not determined from test wells in

Collier County because Tamiami sediments are gradational with ,the

older Hawthorn sediments. Schroeder and Klein (1954, p. 4) suggested a

thickness of about 50 feet for the Tamiami Formation at Sunniland.

The Tamiami Formation is composed predominantly of tan to light

gray sandy and silty clay and shell marls. The lower part of the formation is chiefly shelly, fine sand and greenish clayey marls. These materials are of low permeability and constitute the upper part of the

confining beds of the Floridan aquifer.

The upper part of the Tamiami Formation throughout most of Collier

County is composed of relatively thin, solution-riddled, highly permeable

and very fossiliferous limestone. This limestone member appears to wedge

out a few miles west, south, and east of Immokalee, and according to

Schroeder and Klein (1954, p. 4) it does not occur near the Dade-Broward

County boundary. In well 625-116-1 (fig. 6), 9 miles east of Immokalee at the Hendry County boundary, the limestone was penetrated at a

depth of 22 feet and was more than 82 feet thick. The shallow depth of

the wells immediately east of Immokalee indicates that the member

is thinning to the west. In the vicinity of Naples, the top of the limestones of the Tamiami Formation ranges from about 25 to 55 feet below

the land surface. In southern and southeastern Collier County, it is exposed at the surface or is overlain by a thin veneer of younger materials.
c c\J I- ro c

.... .:... B _ Mean __ Sea _ ' ." -- Level _- ""_ " _

• -- {EXPLANATION

- | ^:~Lithologic Symbols

n SL e Limestone _Sand Clay Shells Phosphatic

.i • 't: or material S'" i • "marlr

0 - -

2Iu 6. LhM e 0 i (D 

Mean Sea Level ---------- I

Fomarl
GROUND-WATER RESOURCES OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 13

It is exposed in canals,and ditches, and is quarried extensively along U.S.

Highway 41 in the southern part of the county and along State Highway

29, principally in the vicinity of Sunniland. In the quarried areas the

limestone is characterized by the large echinoid Encope macrophora

tamiamiensis.

The Tamiami Formation is probably unconformable with overlying

younger sediments. Schroeder and Klein (1954, p. 4) described the surface of the formation in the eastern part of the county as undulating and

dissected. They indicated also that the dissection occurred prior to

Pliocene deposition and possibly again during the Pleistocene.

The limestone of the Tamiami Formation forms the principal shallow

aquifer in Collier County. Its high permeability and widespread occurrence indicate its great importance in the development of large water

supplies in the county.

PLIOCENE SERIES

CALOOSAHATCHEE MARL

The Caloosahatchee Marl is predominantly a grayish green silty,

sandy, shell marl with interbedded layers of sand, silt, clay, and marl

(Parker, et al., 1955, p. 89). The formation rests unconformably on the

Tamiami Formation in the eastern part of Collier County (fig. 3). In

well 625-116-1, 9 miles east of Immokalee, 18 feet of gray sandy, shelly

marl was penetrated (fig. 6) which may represent the Caloosahatchee

Marl. It overlies solution-riddled limestone of the Tamiami Formation.

The generally low permeability of the Caloosahatchee Marl causes

wells drawing water from it to have low yields.

PLEISTOCENE AND RECENT SERIES

ANASTASIA FORMATION

The Anastasia Formation represents the marine deposits of prePamlico Age of the Pleistocene Series in Collier County. Parker, et al.,

(1955, pl. 4) indicated that the Anastasia Formation occurs in a band

about 5 to 6 miles wide along the west coast of Collier County (fig. 3).

At its type locality, Anastasia Island near St. Augustine, the Anastasia

Formation is a coquinoid limestone. In Collier County, however, it appears as a light cream to light gray sandy limestone and tan shelly, sandy

marl containing many Chione cancellata.

Although the Anastasia Formation is present only in a small part of

Collier County (fig. 3), it causes much difficulty in well drilling. Many

small-diameter wells have been abandoned or restricted to shallow depths
14 FLORIDA GEOLOGICAL SURVEY-BULETIN THIRTY-ONE

because drillers could not penetrate a hard, dense limestone in the

formation.

The Anastasia Formation is exposed along the canal banks on the

north side of State Highway 846. Two miles east of the intersection

of State Highway 846 and U.S. Highway 41, the hard limestone of the

formation is very near the land surface and dips toward the Gulf of

Mexico. In well 613-148-1, the formation is 22 feet below land surface

and is probably about 15 feet thick (fig. 6).

The Anastasia Formation probably overlies the Tamiami -Formation

unconformably in most areas of the county. In the southern part of

Collier County along U.S. Highway 41 and in the Sunniland quarries,

very thin beds of hard tan limestone or sandstone, which contain abundant

Chione cancellata, overlie and fill depressions of the old eroded surface

of the Tamiami Formation. Parker, et al., (1955, p. 85) assigned this

limestone to be Anastasia Formation.

Limestones of the Anastasia Formation are generally permeable and

where they are thick, as at Naples, they form an important part of the

shallow aquifer.

FORT THOMPSON FORMATION

The Fort Thompson Formation is composed of alternating marind

and fresh-water deposits. The deposits consist of sand, marl, shell marl,

sandstone, and limestone of fresh-water and marine origin which were

deposited during one or several of the glacial stages of the Pleistocene

(Klein, 1954, p. 13). Any sequence of fresh-water and marine beds, or

fresh-water beds alone, older than Recent fresh-water deposits is considered as representing the Fort Thompson Formation of Pleistocene

Age. (See Schroeder and Klein, 1954, p. 5; Parker, et al., 1955, p. 90-99.)

The Fort Thompson Formation occurs in the eastern part of Collier

County (fig. 3) where it rests unconformably on the Tamiami Formation.

Test drilling indicated that along the eastern boundary of the county the

Fort Thompson Formation ranges in thickness from 3 to 9 feet (Schroeder

and Klein, 1954).

Klein (1954, p. 12-13) described a zone of fresh-water gastropods

overlying the Anastasia Formation in Naples. This zone may represent

or be equivalent to the uppermost zone of the Fort Thompson Formation.

MIAMI OOLITE

The southeast corner of Collier County is covered by the Miami

Oolite, a gray, porous, oolitic limestone (fig. 3). The contact between

the Miami Oolite and the underlying Tamiami Formation can be seen
Io

"•o M0 I T m "

S0 surface

Or , Land L a' 

i " -; .. . Mean - - sea level R.

-cc

! .- ,: - .^ !:- .

r 

; -6 ,-^

S; .--"-- . -

S-eOEXPLANATION

Lithologic Symbols

-3CO- Sand Limestone Clay Shells Phosphatic

or material

Smarl

-320- 0 o I 2 3 miles

Scale

-tsC1

Figure 7. Lithologic cross section along line B-B' in figure 2. Figure 7. Lithologic •cross secton along line.B-B' in figure 2. |'
GROUND-WATER RESOURCES OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 15

in canal banks along U.S. Highway 41 a few miles west of the Dade

County boundary. The Miami Oolite in Collier County probably does

not exceed 5 feet in thickness, but it thickens eastward in Dade County,

where it forms an integral part of the Biscayne aquifer.

PLEISTOCENE TERRACES AND RECENT DEPOSITS

As discussed in the section on physiography, marine terraces were

formed by fluctuations of the sea level during interglacial stages of the

Pleistocene. When the ancient sea stood 42 feet above present sea

level, the Talbot terrace was formed. It is present in Collier County

only in the northern part, where its deposits blanket Immokalee Island

(fig. 3). Deposits of the Talbot terrace are characterized by very fine to

coarse quartz sand and some silt or clay. The sands of the Talbot Formation yield ample water to many shallow sand-point wells in the

vicinity of Immokalee.

The Pamlico Sand was deposited when the sea covered all the land

area of Collier County, which was less than 25 feet above present sea

level (fig. 3). In Collier County the Pamlico Sand is composed of fine

to medium quartz. The base of this sand is 10 to 15 feet below msl in

the Naples area where it immediately overlies the Anastasia Formation.

The uppermost material is white or light gray medium grained quartz

sand, which grades downward to a highly colored rust brown fine

grained quartz sand. The color is apparently caused by the vertical

migration of organic materials in percolating ground water (Klein, 1954,

p. 13). In the interior areas of Collier County, the Pamlico Sand forms

a thin blanket over the Tamiami Formation or the thin, hard limestone

layer of the Anastasia Formation (fig. 6). After the close of Pamlico time

the terrace surface was altered by winds to form dunes. These dunes are

greatly emphasized on Marco Island but are less noticeable along the

upper west coast of the county. The Pamlico Sand forms the top unit

of the shallow aquifer in Collier County.

Recent deposits are composed chiefly of organic materials, derived

from decayed vegetation, mixed with the terrace deposits. Thin accumulations of peat and muck occur also in the Big Cypress Swamp where

they are mixed locally, in depressions, with marly and sandy materials.

TEST-WELL DRILLING

Twelve test wells were drilled in Collier County during the first year

of the investigation. The wells ranged in depth from 123 to 700 feet

below the land surface. The locations of the test wells were determined by the amount and distribution of geologic, hydrologic, and
16 FLORIDA GEOLOGICAL SURVEY-BULLETIN THIRTY-ONE

quality-of-water information obtained during the well inventory phase of

the investigation. The test wells were therefore drilled in areas where

information was scarce or nonexistent.

Samples of the materials penetrated by the test wells were taken at

5-foot intervals whenever possible. When a layer of permeable rock was

penetrated, a water sample was pumped from that layer. In thick permeable zones water samples were pumped at 10-foot intervals. When material of low permeability was penetrated and its water yield was small,

water samples were collected from that depth by use of the bailer.

Several water samples from highly permeable zones were collected for

complete chemical analysis; all the water samples were analyzed for

chloride content.

Water-level measurements were made during the drilling of each

test well. An analysis of these water levels indicates differences in pressure head within a given aquifer or between aquifers. When a permeable

zone was pumped, the yield of the well was estimated at that depth

and water-level measurements were made after pumping stopped to

determine the rate of recovery of the water level. The rate of recovery

is a factor in determining the relative permeability of the tested zone.

One test well, 5 miles east of Miles City, penetrated the Floridan

aquifer. This well was drilled to furnish data on the occurrence of relatively fresh water in the aquifer in the southern part of the county.

During the period 1957-58, several exploratory wells were drilled in

the vicinity of Naples in cooperation with the city of Naples. These wells

were drilled to determine areas that might be developed as sources of

additional water for municipal supply, and to determine the extent of

salt-water encroachment from the Gulf of Mexico. They are also used

as water-level observation wells and are sampled at regular intervals to

determine changes in the salt content of the water.

Rock cuttings and water samples were collected during the drilling

of six privately owned wells. The logs of 18 wells are given in table 5.

GROUND WATER

PRINCIPLES OF OCCURRENCE

Ground water composes one part of the earth's water-circulating system known as the hydrologic cycle. In this cycle water is taken from the

earth's surface into the atmosphere by evaporation. It condenses and

returns to the surface as precipitation. When it falls on land areas the

water moves downward under gravitational forces, seeking to fill all the

pore spaces of the host rock or soil. The portion of material that is filled

r
GROUND-WATER RESOURCES OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 17

with water is called the zone of saturation. The pore spaces of the material overlying the saturated zone are filled with water and air and this material is called the zone of aeration. Water in the zone of saturation is

known as ground water; water in the zone of aeration is referred to as

vadose water (Meinzer, 1923, p. 29-32; 38-39; 76-83). The direction of

movement of vadose water is generally downward because of gravity.

Ground water occurs in permeable geologic formations called

aquifers. If water in the aquifer is unconfined, the upper surface of the

zone of saturation is under atmospheric pressure and is called the water

table. The direction of movement of ground water is controlled by the

slope of the water table.

Confined aquifers, also called artesian aquifers, occur where ground

water is confined by relatively impermeable formations and is under

pressure greater than atmospheric. The direction of movement of ground

water in an artesian aquifer is from points of high pressure to points of

low pressure. Water in a well penetrating a nonartesian aquifer will

rise no higher than the water table, whereas water in a well penetrating

an artesian aquifer will rise above the bottom of the confining formation

to a height determined by the hydrostatic pressure of the aquifer. The

height to which water will rise in tightly cased wells penetrating an

artesian aquifer is called the piezometric or pressure surface. If the piezometric surface is above land surface, the water will flow from the well.

Unconfined or nonartesian aquifers are replenished by the downward infiltration of rainfall, or downward seepage from lakes and

rivers. This replenishment, or recharge, generally occurs throughout the

extent of the aquifer. Confined or artesian aquifers can receive recharge

only in areas where the confining bed is absent, breached, or somewhat

permeable, and the recharge water has a greater head than the water

in the artesian aquifer.

FLORIDAN AQUIFER

Most of Florida is underlain by thick sections of permeable limestones of Miocene and pre-Miocene Ages. These limestones form an

extensive artesian aquifer from which most of the large ground-water

supplies for the central and northern parts of Florida are obtained. Stringfield (1936, p. 125-132, 146) described the aquifer and mapped the

piezometric surface in 1933 and 1934. The name "Floridan aquifer" was

introduced by Parker, et al., (1955, p. 189) to include all parts of the

thick permeable section of limestones of Middle and Late Eocene Age

and Oligocene Age, which constitute a single hydrologic unit, and the
18 FLORIDA GEOLOGICAL SUiVEY-BLLETIN TIRTY-ONE

Tampa Formation and permeable parts of the Hawthorn Formation

which form the top of the aquifer and which are in hydrologic contact

with the rest of the aquifer. The Floridan aquifer is confined by relatively impermeable limestone layers in the Hawthorn Formation and by

the overlying clay and silt beds of the Hawthorn and Tamiami Formations.

The Floridan aquifer underlies all of Collier County. It slopes very

gently in a southerly direction in the county, and the top of the aquifer

is almost everywhere less than 400 feet below msl. The thickness of the

Floridan aquifer in Collier County is not known, but several wells 2,000

feet deep do not completely penetrate it. It yields large amounts of water

to wells by natural flow, but the water is usually so highly mineralized

that its use is limited.

The yield and pressure of the artesian water in the Floridan aquifer

vary with depth. Well 609-115-1, 5 miles east of Miles City, receives

water from two zones within the aquifer. The casing of the well is so

constructed that the two zones are independent of one another. The

upper part of the well is cased to 312 feet below the land surface and

has an open hole from 312 to 485 feet. The lower part of the well is cased

from land surface to 587 feet below the land surface and has an open

hole from 587 to 700 feet. Although each of the open-hole zones yielded

about the same quantity of water, there was a significant difference in

their pressures. On May 26, 1961, the water level of the shallow zone

was 30 feet above msl, whereas that of the deep zone was 52 feet above

msl. The magnitude of the head differential indicates that the material

between the two open-hole intervals is of relatively low permeability and

that the zones may be separate artesian systems.

Two wells in Goodland (fig. 2) also show differences in pressure

resulting from differences in depth. Well 555-139-2 is 540 feet deep and

has 179 feet of open hole. Well 555-139-5 is 342 feet deep and has 22 feet

of open hole. Their water pressures are respectively 33 and 26 feet above

msl.

In the Naples area, isolated lenses or stringers of limestone and shells

within the thick confining section of the Hawthorn Formation have

sufficient permeability to yield moderate quantities of water to relatively

shallow artesian wells. However, these units are not of great importance

because their yield to wells is small and the quality of the water is no

better than that from the Floridan aquifer.

PIEZOMETRIC SURFACE

The piezometric surface of the Floridan aquifer is an imaginary surface representing the pressure head of the confined water and is the
GROUND-WATER RESOURCES OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 19

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR GEOLOGICAL SURVEY

87" 86° 85* 84' 83* 31/' 7-77-

4

.-- EXPLANATION

100 • - 4 to which woler would hove risen in tightly cased wells that * penetrate the major woler-bearing formollons in the Floridan - a oquifer, July 6-17, 1961.

Contour interval 20 feel

- 0 100 32'

S o 0

284 80

260

. 31

29'ý- " -.. •

-30.

25~* /

o"

84. 83 o 82* 81* 0 2

Florido by U.S. Geological Survey by Florida Geological Survey

Figure 8. The piezometric surface of the Floridan aquifer, July 6-17, 1961.

-7 8'0

SO

Bese taken from 1933 edition Of mOP Of Contours taken from mop Series no.]

Florida by U.S. Geological Surney . by Florida Geological Survey

Figure 8. The piezometric surface of the Floridan aquifer, July 6-17, 1961.
20 FLORIDA GEOLOGICAL SURVEY-BULLETI THRTY-ONE

height to which water will rise in tightly cased wells that penetrate the

aquifer. The configuration of the piezometric surface of the Floridan

aquifer in peninsular Florida is shown by the contour lines in figure 8.

The piezometric surface of the Floridan aquifer in Collier County

ranges from 22 feet above msl at Naples to 58 feet above msl in the

northern part of the county, north of Immokalee. It is higher than the land

surface in all parts of the county except the high sand dunes on Marco

Island. The piezometric surface slopes in a southwesterly direction to

the Gulf of Mexico (fig. 9). Ground water in the Floridan aquifer moves

downgradient from areas of high artesian pressure to areas of low artesian

pressure along flow lines which are perpendicular to the contour lines.

Therefore, the flow of ground water in the Floridan aquifer in Collier

County is generally to the southwest. The distortion of the regional pattern of the piezometric surface in the area north of Immokalee is the

result of discharge of several flowing wells in that area.

In figure 9, the slope of the piezometric surface in the coastal and

adjacent areas is fairly steep, indicating discharge from the aquifer in

offshore areas. The average slope in the downgradient areas is about 1

foot per mile; in upgradient areas it decreases and averages about half a

foot per mile. The relatively equal spacing between contour lines

suggests that all the observation wells, measured for pressure readings

used in the preparation of figure 9, penetrate the Floridan aquifer.

RECHARGE AND DISCHARGE

The Floridan aquifer is replenished where the aquifer is at or near

the land surface, or where the altitude of the recharge water is higher than

the piezometric surface and the confining bed is thin, breached, or

relatively permeable. These areas are known as recharge areas. The

principal recharge area for central and southern Florida is Polk County

and vicinity, where the piezometric surface of the aquifer is highest, as

shown in figure 8. In some areas of Polk County, leaky confining beds

overlie the Floridan aquifer (Stewart, 1959, p. 55), and recharge water

under high head can infiltrate vertically from shallow water-bearing

materials to the Floridan aquifer which contains water under a lower

head.

The water level in the Floridan aquifer in Polk County and vicinity

is at a higher altitude than it is in the surrounding areas. The water in

the aquifer moves downgradient, perpendicular to the contour lines, to

points of discharge, principally springs and wells. Discharge by upward

leakage through the confining beds probably occurs in downgradient _-
8r52' 50' 45' 40' 35' 30 25' 20' 15' 10' 05' 8100' 55' 8050

S 1 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 26°34

N 09 .7

H E N\D R Y C 0 U N T Y

30' - - - EXPLANATION

i3Well 30'

3- |iwell

56

- IUpper number is well number

SLower number is water level, in

5 COUNTY - MMO ALEE feet above mean sea level

0 1 2 3 4 5 mile CU N TY " r 25' i . •25 5 5. '

\ - - 0 .-* 5 Contour on the piezometric surface

S/ of the Floridan aquifer in feet

0 above mean sea level, 1960;

dashed where inferred; contour

2 - I intirval 5 feet 20

L \L\ E E Note:

C O-t L IE R * - E No upper number indicates well

S\inventoried in previous investigation

. \\H "' - h ' E N D R Y C O U N T Y ~ -'\\* - ---- /----------------------- -7- -- - - 1 15

\ \ CO LIER \ COUNTY 

\ \ \ \ \ o 1

G 0 L L I E R C 0 U N T Y-

\ \ \ -I

0

2*od 0 5\ 26 '00

s o Dom

c

o

PELAND

-4-

Island 55'

Islaod R ep e C0,70 

g, 'A-t ,-o, DW 50' C/-n._ 0 L L3 I E R C 0 U N T Y

/ MONROE 0 C 0 U N T Y

C 0

254 1 1 1 1 11 15045' 8r52 50' 45' 40' 35' 30' 25 20' - 5' 10 05' 8100' 55' 80050' Base token from maps of the Florida State Road Department

Figure 9. Piezometric surface of the Floridan aquifer in Collier County, 1960.
GROUND-WATER RESOURCES OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 21

areas where the piezometric surface is higher than the water level of the

shallow materials.

Water is discharged from the aquifer in Collier County by about

50 flowing wells. There probably are others which have been capped and

abandoned for many years. The casings of abandoned wells deteriorate

and considerable leakage takes place in the subsurface through them.

25052'

02

S c . Municipal supply well

6 E and number

SPrivate supply well

and number

( 02 0 1/2 mile

51'

chi Scale

25050

Ic'

800

C < m ;=

0,

4-

25050' 82

81"24' 81023 '

Figure 10. Map of Everglades showing location of wells and cross section along

line C-C'.
22 FLORIDA GEOLOGICAL SURVEY-BULLETIN THRTY-ONE

The Floridan aquifer probably crops out on the ocean floor at a

considerable distance from the coast of Collier County. Because the artesian pressure at the coast is high, 22 to 25 feet above msl, considerable

offshore discharge from the aquifer can be expected through submarine

springs.

As there is a large upward pressure gradient within the Floridan

aquifer, shown by water-level measurements in the test well east of

Miles City, water can be continuously discharged from the lower zones

through open well bores into shallow zones. This movement of water can

be extremely important in wells containing long intervals of open hole,

especially where the lower zones contain very highly mineralized water.

AVAILABILITY AND USE OF GROUND WATER

Ground water from the Floridan aquifer is available by natural flow

to wells throughout Collier County except on the high sand dunes of

Marco Island. However, its use is greatly limited because of its relatively

high mineral content. Generally, the water is too salty for most purposes but it is used as a supplemental supply in irrigation systems.

About 40 percent of the flowing artesian wells in Collier County are in

the Immokalee area (fig. 2). Most of these wells were originally used

for irrigation but many have been abandoned or are used only as an

auxiliary supply. Several deep wells in the Naples area are used to

maintain lake levels and supply irrigation water. One artesian well in

downtown Naples was used for many years as a fire-protection well.

The town of Everglades obtains its water supply from four flowing

artesian wells which penetrate the Floridan aquifer (fig. 10). It is the

only place in southern Florida where the quality of the water from the

Floridan aquifer approaches the standards of the U.S. Public Health

Service for drinking water. Usually, wells penetrating the aquifer in the

area south of Lake Okeechobee yield water with a chloride content near

or greater than 1,000 ppm.

During the period 1927-29, four wells were drilled in the town of

Everglades to furnish the municipal supply. Well 551-123-1 was drilled

in the northern part of the town but was abandoned because of the poor

quality of the water. Wells 551-123-2, 3, and 4 were drilled approximately

half a mile south of well 551-123-1. The three wells in this field form a

triangle about 150 feet long on each side. In 1935, well 550-123-1 was

drilled about half a mile south of the well field. A year later, wells

551-123-2 and 3 were deepened to increase their yield. In 1961, water

supplies for the town were furnished by wells 551-123-2 and 3, and wells

551-123-4 and 550-123-1 were reserved for emergencies.
GROUND-WATER RESOURCES OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 23

S N

Si t o

z -400 -0

c-550 ore projected into cross Cosing

O 0.1 mile -450- -5 hole in wells. -500- --- - \ I L---~ 

L_ EXPLANATION

Z -550 Note: Wells 551-125-1 and 2 C \

S-50- re is p a rojected into cross a sing b in csection at right angles

S-600 Open hole i

c e 0 0.1 mile /

-650or water shale was reached at a depth of about 380 feet. The presence

Figure 11. ross section along line C-C' in figure 10, showing amount of open

hole in. wells.

Figure 11 is a cross section in Everglades. The casing bottoms and

total depths of the wells have been presented to show the differences

in construction. Lack of detailed information prohibits determining the

reasons for the differences in amount of open hole in wells relatively

close together.

In four wells, a formation described by the drillerss a water rock

or water shale was reached at a depth of about 380 feet. The presence

of this stratum is probably the reason that the casings in most of the wells

end above this depth. Wells 551-123-2 and 3 were drilled until caving

halted the operation. No explanation is given for the depths of the

other wells. After setting the casing, the driller probably continued to

make open hole until the desired yield was obtained. This supposition is

somewhat supported by the fact that all the wells mentioned above,

except 550-123-1, have been deepened, indicating that the initial flow

had decreased or had become inadequate to supply the demand.

Wells 554-122-1 and 556-128-1 are respectively 4 miles north and 7

miles northwest of Everglades (fig. 2). Both are flowing artesian wells

and yield water of the same salinity. The total depth of well 556-128-1 is

unknown, but it is probably no greater than that of the wells in the
24 FLORIDA GEOLOGICAL SURVEY-BULLETIN THIRTY-ONE

Everglades well field. Well 556-128-1 reached the dark green dense clay

of the Hawthorn Formation at a depth of 292 feet, and a light gray

limestone in the Floridan aquifer at 376 feet. The well was drilled to a

total depth of 392 feet. The materials penetrated in well 556-128-1 correlate very closely to those in well 551-123-6. Well 551-123-6 reached the

green day at a depth of 275 feet and the limestone at 371 feet. The

salinity of the water from well 551-123-6 for the interval 371-414 feet

was considerably higher than that from well 556-128-1.

SHALLOW AQUIFER

The shallow aquifer is the principal source of fresh water in Collier

County. It is composed of the Pleistocene terrace sands, the Anastasia

Formation, and the upper permeable limestones of the Tamiami Formation. The lower parts of the Tamiami Formation, together with the impermeable sections of the Hawthorn Formation constitute the confining

layer for the Floridan aquifer.

The shallow aquifer has a maximum thickness of about 130 feet in

western Collier County, where the Pamlico Sand, the Anastasia Formation, and limestones of the Tamiami Formation are all present and are

fairly well interconnected. It thins eastward to a thickness of about 60,

feet near Sunniland, and wedges out near the Dade County boundary,

where the shallow materials are composed of marls and fine sand. In

southern Collier County, the shallow aquifer is composed entirely of

solution-riddled, highly permeable limestone of the Tamiami Formation

which extends to a depth of at least 90 feet below the land surface.

Test drilling and data on the depth and yield of existing wells in the

Immokalee area indicate a marked change in the lithology of the shallow aquifer in that area. The subsurface materials in the vicinity of

Immokalee are chiefly clastic sediments ranging from marls to very coarse

sands. No limestones of appreciable thickness or permeability were penetrated within the upper 100 feet of the section. Several beds or lenses of

coarse quartz sand occur in this upper section which would probably

yield large quantities of water to screened wells; however, most of the

wells of high yield penetrate limestones and shell beds at depths o•200,

feet or more. These deeper limestones may be interconnected with. the

shallow aquifer.

The thick section of clastics may be part of a frontal edge of a large

delta, which, according to Bishop (1956, p. 26), extended southward

through Highlands County (on the north) during the Miocene Epoch. To

the east and west of the Immokalee area the clastic sediments grade into

'~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ' . c .* . ..
"""^ i '. .i . - . .-. . .l..- -.. . . ... r . . ..... . . ... 

F F'9 617-146-1

48 48 s s

S616-145-1 616-141 -1 616-141-2

* 614-146-1

S612-146-1

9I

f 6TR 10-147-2

PLNT F - 610-146-1

- 610-147-11

610-147 23

610-1 7-2

609-148-13 609-143-1 609-141-1

SNAPLE " EXPLANATION NAPLE / V i

SWATER I , ' LINE OF CROSS SECTION

PANTI 6 0 7-1 4 5 -1 D-- - D

WELL FIELDS

T UNUSED IN USE PROPOSED

I TEST AND OBSERVATION

WELL

0 I 2miles

... . .(9 t ,2 6 .

Base taken from U, S. Geological

Survey topographic quadrangles

Figure 12. Northwestern Collier County showing locations of the Naples municipal well fields and geologic cross sections along lines D-D', E-E', and F-F',
GROUND-WATER RESOURCES OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 25

S+o o o +2 t. o -- o dye mbl u

i0 , 5 EXPLANA TIeN w ~n

-4 0 1o/ ---92- 3 -- --.- :: -4c

Ii - LIMISTDNE -

N -Co ,"( *:

01 C TOLESIZ

iC

in N

in figure 12.

permeable marine limestones which yield large quantities of water to

open-hole wells.

The shallow aquifer supplies large amounts of water for irrigation

throughout the county. The Pleistocene sands yield small amounts of

fresh water to very shallow wells on Marco Island.

During 1957-59, several exploratory wells were drilled east and northeast of Naples in connection with the expansion of water facilities for

Naples (fig. 12). Figures 13, 14 and 15 show the lithology of the shallow

aquifer along the three cross-sectional lines indicated in figure 12. The

cross sections show that east of Naples the aquifer is compared almost

entirely of limestone. Northeast of Naples the aquifer becomes thinner

and. the limestone is interbedded with sand and marl. The Pamlico Sand

(uppermost part of the aquifer), which is about 15 to 20 feet thick

in Naples, thins rapidly eastward.

RECHARGE AND DISCHARGE

The shallow aquifer is recharged principally by local rainfall that

percolates downward to the zone of saturation. During periods of high
26 FLORIDA GEOLOGICAL SURVEY-BULLETIN THIRTY-ONE

E E ~N i 0..

*20 +20

mean ____ se- level 0

-to

-2C 1 68 -20

-

30 II -30

i-40 22 / -

40

SEXPLANATION 202

-5C -50 b.IMESTOME -43 242-2

S~~ / -96

-ac RL /

water -9 levels it is possible that ELLS canals and streams would /9/ afford 655 some- 0 

r nt at or nr the ld sra, r rge by rinl is rrid an

-, C / / 110

-:60 L' _ 385 4" , row | -160

Figure 14. eologic cross section and chloride content of water along line E-E'

in figure 12.

water levels it is possible that canals and streams would afford some

recharge to the aquifer for a short time. Where impermeable layers are

present at or near the land surface, recharge by rainfall is restricted and

much potential recharge is lost by sheet flow to the streams, sloughs,

canals, and Gulf of Mexico.

In the Naples area, a confining bed of silt and marl occurs within

the shallow aquifer and impedes the downward infiltration of ground

water. Materials above the confining bed readily soak up and store a large

amount of rainfall. In much of the area northeast of Naples, a layer of very

hard, dense limestone of low permeability occurs at or immediately below

the land surface. The low permeability greatly decreases the amount of

downward infiltration to the aquifer, and as a result much of the water

in this area drains off as overland flow and does not recharge the aquifer.

f.1.
GROUND-WATER RESOURCES OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 27

- o i 2--- -oot L -+t - 

A +0

Mean sea - level

-0 -70 -10

I I // -1^

-120 -230

0 j 51--- -0

-140 [ a = -40

- o0 -150

-t60 I O S3 I 1 -160

Figure 15. Geologic cross section and chloride content of water along line F-F'

in figure 12.

Figures 16 and 17 show the effect of rainfall on water levels in observation wells penetrating the shallow aquifer in the county.

Well 610-147-14 (fig. 16) is in the Naples well field and is affected by pumping. However, the altitude of the plotted daily highs correlates

closely with rainfall recorded at Naples. The graph of pumpage from the

well field shows that pumping magnifies the fluctuations, especially

during dry periods when pumping is increased.

Water levels in wells 617-184-3 and 625-116-1 are compared to rainfall

recorded at Lake Trafford (fig. 17). Well 617-134-3 is about 10 miles

southwest and well 625-116-1 is about 13 miles east of Lake Trafford.

Time lapses of several days can be noted between rains recorded and

rises in water levels. Some rains show little if any effect, indicating that

probably no rain fell in the vicinity of the well. The same situation appears to be true for well 606-120-1 and Miles City (fig. 17). The hydrographs

show that some areas remain flooded for a considerable time during the

rainy season. rainy season.
W - - - -... ,-- GA.. N -.- .-.- ---. 3- -

• A ' ! • '," _L I I 1 1.

,o.4 -_ . ..... -L _ K\ i...

Til . ,,_ ,.,_ ., - _. _ .,, i 4. .. " .! , . ! _ , 1 , . . ., . i , .

B.

Figure 16. Hydrograph of well 610-147-14 showing daily high, monthly purnpage from Naples well field, and daily rainfall at Naples, June 1958-December 1960.

z-93

from Naples well field, and daily rainfall at Naples, June 1958-December 1960.
GROUND-WATER RESOURCES OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 29

- ! 1Wellw 606-120-I _ I

-7

MILES CITY

-2-

I I ,

SWell 61-1 34-3

1 i

- -" -t

-2 -- -- --- I-- ------- I ----- V 1---------- 51- I

-

I LAKE TRAFFORD

cS2-

JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUNE JULY UG SEPT OCT NOV DEC

1960

Figure 17. Hydrographs of wells 606-120-1, 625-116-1, and 617-134-3, and daily

rainfall at Miles City and Lake Trafford, 1960.

Ground-water losses from the shallow aquifer occur by natural discharge into streams, drainage canals, and the Gulf of Mexico; by evapotranspiration; and by pumping from wells. Losses by natural discharge

are greatest during periods of high rainfall, when ground-water levels

are highest. Also, when ground-water levels are high many parts of the

county are flooded, and as a result the rate of evaporation increases.
80 FLORIDA GEOLOGICAL SURVEY-BULLETIN THIRTY-ONE

Transpiration by plants also account for large losses. Ground water discharged by natural processes far exceeds the amount discharged by

pumping.

Ground-water use is greatest along the western coastal area and in

the northern part of Collier County. In the coastal area the rapid spread

of urbanization has increased the demand for municipal supplies (fig.

16). Several housing subdivisions are supplied by privately owned water

systems. Also, hundreds of small-diameter wells in the area are used

for lawn irrigation and individual household supplies where no municipal

supplies are available.

In northern Collier County scores of large-diameter wells are used

to irrigate truck crops. East of Immokalee wells yield as much as 1,000

gpm (gallons per minute), or more.

WATER-LEVEL FLUCTUATIONS

Fluctuations of the water table in the shallow aquifer reflect changes

in the amount of ground water in storage in the aquifer. Fluctuations

are caused by recharge by rainfall, and discharge by outflow from the

aquifer, evapotranspiration, and pumping of wells. Water levels in wells

near the coast are affected by gulf tides. Minor fluctuations in some areas

result from variations in atmospheric pressure. Rainfall, evapotranspiration, and pumping are the most important factors in the fluctuation of

water levels in the shallow aquifer in Collier County. The hydrographs

in figures 16 and 17 show the fluctuations of water levels in different

areas of Collier County.

Water levels in several wells in northwestern Collier County were

measured to determine the altitude and configuration of the water table

during periods of high and low rainfall. These wells tap the uppermost

section of the aquifer. Figure 18 shows the approximate altitude and

configuration of the water table in the Naples area on August 15, 1960,

after a period of heavy rainfall. The configuration of the contours shows

that the aquifer is recharged by local rainfall. The steep water-table

gradient on the west side toward the gulf suggests that the sandy surface

material is only moderately permeable and can therefore retain large

amounts of ground water in storage. In general, the water table conforms to the topography of the area and the contours indicate that underflow is westward to the Gulf of Mexico, southward to Naples Bay and

the Naples well field, and eastward to the Gordon River drainageway.

Figure 19 shows the configuration and altitude of the water table on

March 29, 1960, after a period of deficient rainfall (Sherwood and Klein,

1960). The pattern is similar to that of August 15, 1960, but the altitude ' *** ' ,.\ ^ * t,_
i °\. , lI 1

3G77 \G

I (b \0

g 4/

O 'S

6.07 13.77

Iu.oi wer to 

90 16.12

wter-tble altitude, in

Sfeet,on 9. Augus 15,229603 

50 /2--- 5

2.37

C 4

NAPLE EXPLANATION

06.60

C ontour showing thea

water-fable altitudei

- feet, -on August 15, z1 960

Contour showing the water-table altitude

in feet; dashed where

inferred; contour interval

2 feet; datum is mean

sea level.

o I 2miles

R25- F - R26E

Base taken from U. S. Geological Survey topographic quadrangles

Figure 18. Water-level contour map of northwestern Collier County, August 15,

1960.
.f" - - C i ' ............

4N

T

48

i' ii

I 0 /

5

lT T TE

"low

contour interval 2 feet;

datum is mean sea level.

1960.

onturvaionterval and

of watse n salevel.

R2: 26 loetke rmU.S eooia

Suve toorpi quadrangle Fiue1.Wtrlvlcntu npo otwsen ole ony ac 9 1960
GROUND-WATER RESOURCES OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 31

of the water surface is somewhat lower. Both contour maps show the

effect of pumping in the municipal well field, which is indicated by a shallow water-table depression in the northeastern part of the city.

Water-level measurements made during the drilling of test wells and

supply wells along the coastal area showed differences in head between

the upper and lower parts of the aquifer. Along the central part of the

ridge, the water levels in shallow wells (25-30 feet deep) ranged from

1 to 3 feet higher than the water levels in wells penetrating the deeper

part of the aquifer (60-100 feet deep). Such head differential causes

downward leakage of ground water. It is typical of the recharge areas,

and the magnitude of the differential is related to the degree of confinement of the zone between the two parts of the aquifer. In the peripheral

areas where discharge from the aquifer takes place, the head relationship is reversed; the water levels in deep wells range 1 to 2 feet higher

than those in the shallow wells and upward leakage occurs. In the municipal well-field area, where wells 60 to 100 feet deep are heavily pumped,

water levels in the upper part of the aquifer are substantially higher

than those in the lower part and much of the ground water pumped is

supplied by downward leakage in the area of the cone of depression.

The graphs in figure 16 show the relationship between pumpage,

rainfall, and water-level fluctuations in well 610-147-14, in the Naples

well field, for the period June 1958 - December 1960. Although the well

penetrates the lower part of the aquifer, the response of the water level

in the well to rainfall is rapid. Pumping is the major factor causing large

declines in the vicinity of the well field; other fluctuations such as those

caused by tides and variations in barometric pressure are minor.

AVAILABILITY AND USE OF GROUND WATER

The shallow aquifer is the prinicpal source of fresh ground water

in the county except for the area in the vicinity of Everglades. The

limestone of the Tamiami Formation is the chief water-bearing zone of

the aquifer in most of the county. On Marco Island, the Pamlico Sand provides the only obtainable potable ground-water supply.

The shallow aquifer yields ground water at various depths depending

on the location. In the west to west-central part of the county, it produces from a zone that ranges in depth from about 35 to 100 feet below

the land surface; in the central part, from 20 to 90 feet; in the northern

part, from shell beds and coarse sand lenses at various depths in the

Pleistocene terrace and other sediments; in the southern part, from land

surface to about 30 feet; and in the southeastern part, from about 20 to

25 feet.
32 FLORIDA GEOLOGICAL SURVEY-BULLETIN THIRTY-ONE

--500 0- -- - - - * * -

5d~ 00 -- ----- ----- _ ----- _ ----- _ ----- _ -------- _

0

^j300--

-4 520

7C

I6 14 19,56 958 9 196S6

-S

90-

.80

560 - - y--A50-

4-

:;ý 30 - - 7--- -- ----- -------

20-

I46 48 1950 1952 1954 1956 1958 1960 962

Figure 20. Graph showing annual pumpage from the Naples well fields, 1945-62.

Large quantities of ground water are obtained from the shallow

aquifer in the farm belt which stretches from Immokalee southwestward

to the Tamiami Trail (U.S. Highway 41) north of Naples. Irrigation wells
GROUND-WATER RESOURCES OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 33

near the western edge of the farm belt are generally about 60 to 70

feet deep, but farther inland their maximum depth is about 100 feet.

The small community of Copeland obtains its water supply from the

limestone of the Tamiami Formation. Well 556-121-2, which supplies

Copeland, was drilled to a depth of 30 feet in 1945. At that time the

cypress lumber industry was near its peak and the population of Copeland was considerably greater than the 1960 population of 100 to 150.

During 1945 the well was pumped at an average rate of 75,000 gpd, or an

annual amount of 27.4 million gallons. The well was still in operation in

1961.

Before 1945, the municipal supply for Naples was obtained from one

6-inch and two 4-inch wells located in the southern part of the city,

between Naples Bay and the Gulf of Mexico (fig. 12). These wells were

closely spaced and were pumped heavily for short periods, which caused

salt water to move inland and upward and thus contaminate the aquifer.

During 1945-46, a new well field was established north of the original

well field. This field comprises 22 small-diameter wells (3- and 4-inch)

spaced 400 feet apart. To dimish the effect of large drawdowns of the

water levels, each well was pumped at a rate not to exceed 30 gpm. This

control of withdrawals distributed the effect of pumping over a large area

and reduced the hazard of salt-water encroachment. The annual pumpage from this well field increased from about 33 million gallons in 1947

to 122 million gallons in 1954.

The city officials proposed the establishment of a new permanent

well field because of the constantly increasing demand for water (fig.

20), the high cost of pumping 22 wells, and the constant threat of saltwater encroachment from the Gulf of Mexico and the Gordon River

into the field. Their objective was to establish a well field in the cypress

swamp area east and north of the city; but no data were available as to

the continuity of the aquifer and the quality of the ground water in that

area. The city officials believed that a productive field in this area

could furnish sufficient water for all the coastal ridge area of Collier

County. A new well field was developed in 1954 in the northeastern part

of the city (fig. 12), and further expansion of facilities would be inland.

Water-treatment plant No. 2 was built at this field.

In 1958, three wells were drilled northeast of water plant No. 2 to

supplement the supply from the well field. The layout of the present

well field with the extension wells is shown in figure 21. Total pumpage

from the well field and extension was 414 million gallons in 1960, more

than 25 percent above the total for 1959.
410/ EXPLANATION

OBSERVATION WELL

9 SUPPLY WELL

RECORDING GAGE

5S e " 1 IN 411 1 610-147-4 -7- 1

4 6 14 610-04714 

S0610-147-4717

1 \0610-147-15

610-147-6 0610-147-7

610-147-9

610-147-18 610-147-8 0

610-147 2 61047- 610-47-2 701 0 04. -47-5 o 610-147-12 610-147-1

610-147-3

147-4

60 148-1 C0

Figure 21. Naples well field area showing municipal supply wells and observation

wells.
GROUND-WATER RESOURCES OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 35

QUANTITATIVE STUDIES

HYDRAULICS OF AQUIFERS

When a well tapping a shallow aquifer begins to discharge, water is

removed form the aquifer surrounding the well and the water level is

lowered. The amount that the level is lowered at the well is called the

drawdown. The decline of the water table near the discharging well is

rapid and large but decreases rapidly outward from the well. An inverted

cone, centered at the discharging well, defines the dewatered part of

the aquifer and is referred to as the cone of depression or cone of influence. As the discharge continues at a constant rate, the cone spreads

outward, thereby diverting more water to the well.

If recharge is available and a sufficient amount can be diverted

toward the well to balance the withdrawal, the cone spreads no farther,

and the shape of the cone will remain constant. Deepening of the cone

will result if the discharge rate is increased or if another nearby well in the

aquifer begins discharging. When pumping from the well ceases, the water

level immediately starts to recover, rapidly at first, then at a slowly decreasing rate, to the static water level of the area.

The rate of drawdown and recovery in the vicinity of a well depends

in part upon the transmissibility of the aquifer. In an aquifer of high

transmissibility the drawdown is relatively small and the cone of depression is wide and shallow; in an aquifer of low transmissibility the drawdown is relatively great and the cone is narrow and deep.

Unlike the effect of withdrawal from a water-table well, where the

result is a dewatering of the aquifer within the cone of depression, withdrawal from an artesian well results in a lowering of pressure at the well,

and the effect, theoretically, is transmitted with the speed of sound

throughout the aquifer. In an artesian aquifer, water is released from

storage as a result of the compaction or squeezing of sediments when the

artesian pressure is lowered, and as a result of the slight expansion of

water itself. The basic principle of the cone of influence remains in effect

for both types of aquifers, but the cone develops more rapidly in an

artesian aquifer because the amount of water released from storage per

unit area is much smaller than that resulting from dewatering an unconfined aquifer.

From data obtained by observing water levels in a pumped well and

observation wells in the cone of influence, the coefficients of transmissibility and storage can be determined.

The coefficient of transmissibility is the capacity of an aquifer to

transmit water. It is expressed as the quantity of water, in gallons per
36 FLORIDA GEOLOGICAL SURVEY-BULLETIN THIRTY-ONE

day, that will move through a vertical section of the aquifer 1 foot wide

under a hydraulic gradient of 1 foot per foot (Theis, 1938, p. 892). The

coefficient of storage is a measure of the capacity of an aquifer to store

water and is defined as the volume of water released from or taken into

storage per unit surface area of the aquifer per unit change in the component of head normal to that surface.

In aquifers where leakage occurs through semiconfining beds, a leakage coefficient can be determined. The leakage coefficient (Hantush,

1956, p. 702) characterizes the ability of semiconfining beds above or

below an aquifer to transmit water to the aquifer. It may be defined as

the quantity of water that crosses a unit area at the interface between

the main aquifer and its confining bed, if the difference between the

head in the main aquifer and in the beds supplying the leakage is unit.

AQUIFER TESTS

Seven aquifer tests were made in or near Collier County prior to this

investigation. Six of the tests were made in Naples in connection with

well-field development, and one was made at the county boundary east

of Immokalee. The first three tests were made in 1951-52 to determine

the safe rate of pumping from the well field in the southern part of the

city. From analyses of the water-level data obtained from these tests, a

coefficient of transmissibility of 92,000 gpd per foot and a coefficient of

storage of 0.001 were determined (Klein, 1954, p. 47).

Further studies in the area and a comparison of future water demands

and the availability of water indicated that the municipal supplies would

have to be extended northward where water levels were higher and

where the threat of salt-water contamination was less. In 1954, water

plant No. 2 (fig. 21) was built and the new well field was established

(fig. 12).

Aquifer tests made by Sherwood and Klein (1961) in the new field

indicated that the transmissibility -of the aquifer increased northward,

and in the proposed area of expansion (fig. 12) a coefficient of transmissibility of 185,000 gpd per foot was computed. The tests indicated that,

although the upper part of the aquifer contained semiconfining layers,

downward leakage was considerable when the well field was pumped.

This leakage reduced drawdowns in the lower, pumped zone of the

aquifer. The Gordon River, east of the well field was determined to be

a source of replenishment at times when the field was pumped heavily.

Figure 22 shows the drawdowns in observation wells at the end of

a 30-hour pumping test in the proposed area of development. The
GC.CUND-WVATs.: iEOURCES OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 87

DISTANCE, IN FEET FROM PUMPING WELL

o 0 0 0

wu 0.5 U. 610147-80 0610-147-9 - '

: 610-147-170

S 0I.0 610-147-7 610-14718

2.0

610-147-1 /, / ?, - 0

610-147-13

610-147-15

610-147-7

EXPLANATION *189 WELL BEING PUMPED

01ol63

OBSERVATION WELL

APPROXIMATE AREA

FLOODED DURING TEST 610147

0610-147-18 610-147-8 0 100 200 300 400 500

SCALE IN FEET

- GORDON RIVER 1700 FEET EAS--- --

Figure 22. Graph showing drawdown in observation wells at the end of the 30-hour

aquifer test, January 9-10, 1959, and sketch showing wells used in the test.

drawdowns in wells between the pumped well and the Gordon River

were substantially less than in wells west of the pumped well. The coefficient of leakage computed for this test ranged from 0.001 to 0.008 gpd per

square foot per foot of head difference. In general, the coefficient

increased eastward.

In the ideal leaky-aquifer system (fig. 28) of Jacob (1946, p. 199) the

water table in the nonartesian aquifer is maintained at a constant level
38 FLORIDA GEOLOGICAL SURVEY-BULLETIN THIRTY-ONE

WELL

WATER TABLE

PIEZOMETRIC UIRFACE

SNONARTESIAN AQUIFER

SEMIPERVIOUS

S//CONFINING BED

<-- ARTESIAN AQUIFER

IMPERVIOUS BED

Figure 23. Idealized sketch showing flow in a leaky artesian aquifer system.

by recharge. Pumping from the artesian aquifer causes a cone of depression to form which expands until the amount of downward leakage

equals the amount of water withdrawn. In the Naples area. however, the

water table in the shallow sands of the upper zone is not maintained constant due to insufficient recharge; therefore, the rate of downward leakage to the pumped zone will decline and the cone of depression will

continue to spread.

Figure 24 shows drawdown graphs of wells 610-147-9 and 610-147-15

during the aquifer test of January 1959 (fig. 22). The A curves represent the theoretical drawdown for artesian conditions with no recharge

and were computed from the coefficients of transmissibility and storage

determined from the aquifer tests. The B curves represent the theoretical

drawdowns for nonartesian conditions with no recharge and after extended time. The B curves were computed with a coefficient of storage

of 0.15 (characteristic of nonartesian aquifers) and a coefficient of trans-.

missibility 10 percent higher than that determined from the test (to take

into account the transmissibility of the upper zone). The water levels

near the end of the test were constant, indicating leaky-aquifer conditions and downward leakage was keeping pace with discharge. The C

curves are projections of the observed data and indicate the water level

would remain constant if sufficient recharge was available. The D curves
GROUND-WATER RESOURCES OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 39

TIME IN MINUTES,SINCE PUMPING BEGAN 11000 10000 100000 00 PO

610-147-15

* CU 1 R C\

.5 - -

1 IIT 1 9 1 iear I I I i Month 

UV

0.5- - -- - U!, E'>

EXPLANATION

CURVE A C Theoretical drowdown ortesion conditions S (no recharge) N

CURVE B " X ,i ! ill I Theoretical drowdownwoter-foble conditions I i (no recharge) URV A CURVE C G .

Drawdown.leoky-aquiter conditions i

Observed drowdowni

.5Theoretical drowdown(unlimited recharge) -

CURVE D i II Theoretical drowdown.leoky-aquifer conditions (no rechorge_ I

Figure 24. Graph showing drawdowns in wells 610-147-9 and 610-147-15 during

aquifer test January 9-10, 1959, and theoretical drawdown for artesian, watertable, and leaky-aquifer conditions.

represent the theoretical drawdown in a leaky aquifer with no recharge

and were computed from the coefficients of transmissibility and storage

determined from the test.

The drawdown caused by longtime pumping is reflected at the water

table, and is controlled by the coefficients of storage and transmissibility

of the upper and lower zones, and the availability of replenishment.

Cities along the lower east coast of Florida have developed large

water supplies by locating well fields near canals. These canals tap

large water reserves in inland areas and are controlled near their outlets
40 FLORIDA GEOLOGICAL SURVEY-BULLETIN THIRTY-ONE

by salinity barriers (check dams). Water levels in the well fields are

maintained by infiltration from the canals into the aquifer. Because of

relatively high inland swamps draining toward the Gulf of Mexico and

the hydraulic characteristics of the shallow aquifer, large water supplies

can be obtained in northwestern Collier County by methods similar to

those used in southeastern Florida.

In June 1958, a pumping test on wells in the shallow aquifer was made

at the Collier County boundary, east of Immokalee (Klein, Litchtler, and

Schroeder, written communication). Wells 625-116-1 and -2 were used

as observation wells, and a large-diameter irrigation well just east of

the county boundary was pumped at 1,300 gpm. Analyses of the data

from the wells in Collier County indicated that the average coefficient

of transmissibility was 910,000 gpd per foot, the average coefficient of

storage was 0.00033 and the average coefficient of leakage was 0.000014

gpd per square foot per foot of vertical head.

The low permeability of the 15-foot layer of sandy clay that caps

the aquifer in this area (fig. 7) is indicated by the small coefficient of

leakage. The relatively low coefficient of storage indicates that artesian

conditions prevail in the aquifer. The high transmissibility of the aquifer

DISTANCE, IN FEET, FROM PUMPED WELL

100 1,000 10,000

629-126-1

1.0 ,

1.5 - 629-127-3 * 629-127-1

z ,629-127-2

(Pumped well) 0 400 800 feet

S2.Scale z2 0 - N

S(Pumped 

629-127-3 well) 0 40

2.5 629-127-1

3.0

629-126-1

3.5 I - I I I-l- I II I I I I I 'I I I

Figure 25. Sketch showing wells used in pumping test, April 8-10, 1960, and

graph showing drawdown at the end of the 44-hour test.
GROUND-WATER RESOURCES OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 41

and the large areal extent of the main limestone of the aquifer indicate

that very large quantities of water probably are available east and southeast of Immokalee.

During April 8-10, 1960, a pumping test was made 5 miles northwest

of Immokalee. Figure 25 is a sketch showing the locations of the observation wells and the pumped well used during the test and a graph of

the drawdowns recorded at the end of the test.

Well 629-127-2 was pumped for 44 hours at 152 gpm. The water was

discharged into an adjacent drainage ditch which conveyed it from the

immediate area. Recording gages were installed on the three observation

wells to obtain a complete record of the water-level fluctuations-in the

wells. The gages were in operation a week before the test to

obtain background data on the natural fluctuations of the water level.

These background records were used to adjust the recorded drawdowns

obtained during the pumping period.

Figure 26 is a hydrograph of the uncorrected drawdown and recovery data from well 629-127-3. Pumping of an irrigation well 1.9 miles

west of the test site started about 4 hours after the pumping test began;

however, the effect of this pumping is not apparent on the drawdown

curve of figure 26. The slight undulations on the hydrograph probably

are caused by variations in atmospheric pressure and evapotranspiration.

The drawdown data were adjusted to correct for the fluctuations

caused by factors other than pumping. Coefficients of transmissibility

and storage computed from this test were 58,000 gpd per foot and

0.00024, respectively, at well 629-127-1 and 62,000 gpd per foot and

0.00026, respectively, at well 629-127-3. These values are considerably

lower than those computed for the Naples area. The leakage coefficient

at the Immokalee site was computed at 0.00073 gpd per square foot per

foot of vertical head at well 629-127-1 and 0.00099 gpd per square foot

per foot of vertical head at well 629-127-3. These values also are much

lower than those computed for Naples and indicate more effective confining layers above the main producing zone of the aquifer in the area

northwest of Immokalee. Therefore, in this area the main producing

zone receives less recharge by downward leakage than the main producing zone in the Naples area. The low coefficients of storage in the

area indicate that the main producing zone is under artesian conditions.

QUALITY OF WATER

Aquifers in Collier County contain very large supplies of ground

water, but in many places the water is unsuitable for drinking as the result

of the high concentrations of undesirable minerals.
APRIL 1960

S APR APRIL 9 APRIL I10 APRIL II APRIL 12

yTtest pump on 9.0 1-14 PM

T 9.

9,A - Approtiemat timS9.6 . Approimote time form

pump, 1.9 miles to west* ,pp i tim

§ 9.6 - toa ed fm pump stoppd

, 10.0

5 10.2 -

S10.4 - I Tet pump off S90.'49:33 AM

12'ISPM 3 6 9 12M 3 6 9 12N 3 6 9 12M 3 6 9 12N 3 6 9 12M 3 6 9 12N 3 6 9 12M 3 6 9 1115AM

Figure 26. Drawdown and recovery of water level in well 629-127-3 showing

effects of pumping test, April 8-10, 1960.
GROUND-WATER RESOURCES OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 43

The amount and character of the chemical constituents in ground

water are controlled for the most part by the composition of the rocks

through which the water passes; the temperature and pressure of the

water and the duration of contact with the rocks; and the amount of

material in solution or suspension. However, salt-water encroachment can

cause normally fresh ground water to become highly mineralized under

certain conditions.

Most drinking-water supplies in the United States conform to standards established by the U.S. Public Health Service. Below are some of

the more common constituents and the maximum limits recommended by

the U.S. Public Health Service (1961).

Chloride 250 ppm

Dissolved solids, desirable 500 ppm

Dissolved solids, permitted 1,000 ppm

Iron, manganese, together 0.3 ppm

Iron in quantities greater than that listed above is objectionable

because it imparts a disagreeable taste and it quickly discolors objects

with which it comes into contact. Its presence in ground water is unpredictable as to both depth and location. Fortunately, iron can be removed

easily by aeration and filtration.

The amount of dissolved solids indicates the degree of mineralization of ground water.

The words "salt water" as used in this report identify ground water

containing large amounts of chloride. About 91 percent of the dissolvedsolids content of sea water consists of chloride salts. Thus, determinations

of the chloride content of ground water are generally a reliable indication

of the extent to which normally fresh ground water has become contaminated with sea water.

Normal sea water has a chloride content of about 19,000 ppm. Some

individuals can taste the salt in water having a chloride content of 500

ppm. If a salty taste is not noticed at this concentration, the water may

have a "flat" taste. Most persons can detect salt in ground water having a

chloride content of 750 ppm or more.

Hardness is a measure of the calcium and magnesium content of

ground water and is customarily expressed as the equivalent of calcium

carbonate. Water having a hardness of less than 60 ppm is rated as soft;

of 60 to 120 ppm, as moderately hard; and of 120 to 200 ppm, as hard.

Water having a hardness of more than 200 ppm ordinarily requires softening for most uses.
44 FLORIDA GEOLOGICAL SURVEY-BULLETIN THIRTY-ONE

The pH indicates the acidity or alkalinity of the ground water. The

pH scale ranges from 0 to 14, with 7 indicating neutral water. Values less

than 7 denote increasing acidity, and those greater than 7 denote increasing alkalinity.

FLORIDAN AQUIFER

Except in the town of Everglades and vicinity, the Floridan aquifer

in Collier County yields water undesirable for drinking. The chloride

content of the water generally is more than 1,000 ppm. Table 2 gives

the results of the chemical analysis of water samples from certain wells

in the Floridan aquifer.

The high mineralization in the water from the Floridan aquifer is due

to either, or to a combination, of the following factors: (1) Sea water

that was trapped in the sediments at the time they were deposited on

the floor of an ancient sea (connate or residual sea water); (2) sea water

that entered the aquifer during interglacial stages of the Pleistocene

Epoch, when most of Florida was covered by shallow seas; and (3) a

recent salt-water encroachment of the Floridan aquifer. The aquifer has

undergone flushing action, but considerable contaminants remain.

In the vicinity of the town of Everglades, the Floridan aquifer yields

relatively fresh water. In 1960, the chloride content of the water from

individual wells in the municipal well field ranged from 190 to 360 ppm,

and the water from well 550-123-1, south of the field, contained 240 ppm.

Following is a tabulation of the changes of chloride content of the water

from three wells in Everglades (fig. 10, 11):

Date Chloride content, in ppm

Well Well Well

550-123-1 551-123-2 551-123-3

Feb. 1949 __ 278 185

Aug. 1949 98

Apr. 1950 282 186

Jan. 1951 __ 287 186

Sept. 1951 _ 285 192

Mar. 1952 99 295 195

Oct. 1952 95 190

Aug. 1954 106 255 _

Oct. 1959 240 350 _

May 1960 __ 360 190

The relatively low chloride content of water from wells 550-123-1 and

551-123-3 indicates some of the water moving southward from the
TABLE. 2. Chemical Analyses of Water from Selected Wells that Penetrate the Floridan Aquifer in Collier County 0

(All results are in parts per million except thse for color, pH, and specific conductance)

Specific o

Date Cal- Mag- Pctas- Bicar- Chlo- Flu- Dis- Hard- conductWell sam;le Depth Silica Iron cium nesium Sodium slum bonate Sulfate ride cride solved ness as Color pH ance

number collected (feet) (Si02) (Fe) (Ca) (Mg) (Na) (K) (HCO0) (SO4) (Cl) (F) solids CaCO3 (microhmos

at 250C)

50-12-1........ 10- 5-35 503 0.5 0.06 20 26 22 ........ 366 197 106 ........ 800 155 ........ ............

551-123-6........ 3-11-57 536 15 .01 63 76 567 20 276 212 000 0.7 2,070 470 0 7.7 3,480

554-118-3........ 12- 3-56 446 17 .02 00 117 060 25 230 455 1,400 1.0 3,400 728 15 8.0 5,360

554-143-1........ 4-28-50 402 12 .64 288 167 1,000 200 106 488 2,800 .5 6,010 504 0 7.0 8,010

550-128-1........ 4- 8-50 302 10 1.6 54 44 245 1.5 316 00 310 1.1 047 316 0 8.0 1,660

600-115-1........ 0-23-50 485 33 .22 68 93 725 37 414 372 085 1.2 2,570 552 2 7.4 4,320

630-126-i........ 12-15-41 566 ........ .01 108 99 433 ........ 180 302 820 ........ ........ 677 5 ........ ............ a
46 FLORIDA GEOLOGICAL SURVEY-BULLETIN THIRTY-ONE

recharge area (in central Florida) remains relatively uncontaminated

throughout its course to the south end of the peninsula. This fresh-water

zone may constitute only a very thin section of permeable limestone in

the uppermost part of the aquifer.

The increase in chloride content in recent years may be due to the

following: (1) Upward leakage of inferior water, under high pressure,

through open well bores to zones of fresh water under lower pressure,

during a long period of continued water use; (2) upward movement of

inferior water resulting from large drawdowns caused by heavy industrial use of water from deep wells in an area about 2,000 feet north of the

well field.

SHALLOW AQUIFER

Ground-water samples were collected at different depths during the

drilling of test wells and from certain wells. The chemical analyses of the

ground water in the shallow aquifer in Collier County are shown in table

3. Ground-water samples for the analysis of chloride content were taken

from every well inventoried during the investigation. Water from the

aquifer is generally potable and could be used without treatment; however, it is hard and softeners are used in many systems.

In areas southeast of Naples and near Copeland, residents use commercially bottled water for their drinking supply.' This does not mean

that individual water supplies cannot be treated to supply potable ground

water, but rather the expense of treatment may exceed the cost of

bottled water. Ground-water supplies are still used for purposes other

than drinking.

Domestic ground-water supplies in the Immokalee area are obtained

generally from permeable beds in the Hawthorn Formation. This is probably due to the fact that the water from the Hawthorn beds has less

undesirable constituents such as iron and hardness. However, many wells

penetrating shallow sand or shelly material in the aquifer yield ground

water of good quality which does not require treatment.

The data from table 3 and the analysers reported by Klein (1954,

p. 38-40) show that ground water from the' shallow aquifer in the Naples

area is relatively high in mineral content except along and immediately

east of the coastal area. Figure 27 shows the approximate chloride content of water samples from wells and surface-water sampling points in

northwestern Collier County. The. complete results from the chloride

sampling are shown in table 4.
1 N

-r 

48 

T e 141 T4

S IS

- 2 58 26 C1

100 61 140

: 67 1 43

72

449

1J12

Ii T- ot

S S

79 3- 4

1 4 4

8 1 p per milion)

7.3,-}i4 71Well;upper " number 7........ 6. -. O50 Sinumberof wellT 

50 , depth ot eir ll "

22 1551 00 s

-5 7 - -re 0 l

5911 

8

24

U observation Surface water point 101--250

and station number 251-500

013 o

SChlore than 500tent

2 123 (parts per million) 120 Well~upper number 0... "*-

cal50 taken from U, S, Geolo isse 

Survey topographic quadrangles

s. 51 -100 s

Figure 27 Northwestern Coier County showing chloride content o water 101from250

slctd nd wells surfce-water observation point

and station number 251-500

More than 500

-1wsolccc .. ,lls .. , ... vC,,,.. unmen. olsev tomnm4w pontesu
TABLE 3. Chemical Analyses of Water from Selected Wells that Penetrate the Shallow Aquifer in Collier County

(Results in parts per million except those for color, pH, and specific conductance)

Depth of Dissample Date sld Speciic Well belo of - Silica Iran Cal- M - Sodium Pota- Bicr- Sulfate Chlo- Flu- Nitrate aolids Hard- conde.

number land lection (502) (Fe) dum nsim (Na) dn booate (50) ride oride (Oid ) (rmi- n as tance pH Color

.zrfae (C) (M) (K) (HCO) (CI) (F) due at CaCO (micromho

(feet) ISM0) at 25'C)

-59-120-1 44 8-14-59 5.4 0.01 56 5.0 17 0.5 198 10 25 0.2 0.3 220 160 378 8.1 15

606-143-1 142 8-13-59 20 .02 140 15 75 3.0 374 11 10 .0 1.4 781 411 1,140 7.5 8

608-1464 90 1-16-59 13 2.1 130 8.6 24 .0 386 4.0 48 .1 .0 492 360 747 8.0 0

60147-22 40 1-11-52 ................ ........ ........ 4* ........ 314 4.5 62 ........ 1.0 ........ 244 6 7.7 ..... 70 1-14-52 11.0 .10 69 3 8.8 .6 218 4.5 . 15 .1 .5 241 184 368 7.8 45

609-115-1 28 9- 2-59 10 1.9 144 2.1 16 .3 466 .2 25 .3 .8 478 368 708 7.0 8 5

609-120-1 90 8-20-59 11 .00 54 7.7 12 .4 210 .0 15 .2 .1 207 166 364 7.5 5

609-141-1 41 7-16-58 17 .09 166 32 162 5.6 438 77 325 .2 1.5 1,000 731 1.720 7.3 20 0

609-143-1 44 7-17-58 12 .01 166 15 97 2.6 464 7.5 205 .3 .9 735 572 1,270 7.3 23

610-146-1 28 7-28-58 ........ ........ 119 6.6 35 .7 ........ 10 68 ....... ........ ........ 324 753 ....... ...... 52 7-28-58 ........ ........ 148 13 102 2.7 ........ 43 202 ........ ........ ....... 418 1,280 ........ ........ 96 7-28-58 ................ 214 36 315 4.4 ........ 178 65 ........ ........ ........ 682 2,790 ..............

610-147-13 63 3-19-58 11.0 .27 72 .1 9.0 .9 220 1 18 .1 .7 225 180 394 7.6 28

612-146-1 85 7-30-58 ........ .03 13 8.0 46 2.3 ........ 10 92 ................ ........ 290 766 ........ ........

612-148-2 75 1-22-58 ........ .01 68 9 ........ ........ 252 3 15 .5 ........ 229 208 ............ 7.5 18

616-131-1 110 8-10-59 23 .01 70 15 40 4.6 308 14 41 .4 .2 365 236 609 8.1 15

616-141-2 46 7-28-59 10 2.3 170 6.3 26 .2 520 4.4 46 .0 .3 599 474 911 7.1 68

240 8- 3-59 20 .76 196 89 631 21 236 440 1,150 .1 1.0 2,660 1,517 4,530 ....... 5

616-145-1 58 7-20-58 24 1.0 134 29 162 7.2 418 122 275 .3 .1 960 5r5 1.640 7.3 17

621-135-2 92 7-24-59 25 .78 72 16 39 4.0 336 11 32 .0 .6 370 246 625 7.6 2

625-116-1 54 3-10-55 17 .36 114 16 50 2.6 451 .1 69 .3 2.0 534 353 876 7.3 75

625-124-1 282 5-16-58 30 .02 98 22 18 1.9 40I• 4.0 38 .2 .1; 407 338 702 7.7 25

SSodium, potasium as sodium (SN).
TABLE 4. Chloride Content, in Parts Per Million, fron Selected Wells in Northwestern Collier County

(Depth of sample given in feet below land surface)

Depth Cb.- Depth Chlo. Depth Chlo- Depth Chlo- Well number (feet) Date rile (feet) Date rite (feeu) Diate ride (feet) Date rid

605-14.-2................ 32 1- 2-50 130 ................ .... ............. ....................................

605-143-3 ............... . 32 1- 2-50 174 ........ .. . ........ ... ......... ... ..... ... ........................ .... ....

605-14 -4 ................. 42 1- 2-50 13 .. ........ ... .................. ....... ..... . . ......... ........... ......

665-144-2. ................ 83 1- 2-50 172 ................. ........ .... ...................................................

607-145-1................ ..... 25 11-17-58 83 66 11-17-58 153 92 11-17-58 304 110 11-18-58 472 46 11-17-58 92

607-146-2................. 120 1-1-50 119 .......................... ............................ ........ ...... .. ......

608-146-6................. 72 1-16-50 127 .............. ......... ........ ........................................ . ..... 

609-141-1 ................. 41 7-14-58 325 64 7-14-58 445 144 7-16-58 885 ..........................

609-143-1.................. 44 7-17-58 205 70 7-17-58 580 123 7-17-58 1,750 ......... 7-17-58 1,250

609-147-24 ................ 78 5- 6-54 16 ............................... ...

609-14-12................ 72 12-31-52 168 ........ 3- 7-5d 165 ........ 3-13-61 158 ........ 5- 8-61 186 5-15-53 181 .... 2-27-57 182 ........ 4-28-61 156 ........ 6- 6-61 166 - -5 168 ........ 320-58 190 ........ 5- 2-61 170 ........ 7-14-61 162 ........ 2-28-55 169

610-146-1................. 28 7-28-58 68 61 7-28-58 242 06 7-28-58 655 120 7-29-58 875 52 7-28-58 202

610-147-5.................. 75 2-28-55 20 ........ 6- 8-59 26 ........ 8-15-60 34 ........ 6-16-61 30 3- 7-56 15 ........ 12- 3-59 16 ........ 3-13-61 22 ........ 7-14-61 28 s- 5-58 17 ....... 1- 6-60 15 ........ 4-2-61 34 ....... -11-61 30 5-4-54 20 ........ 3-29-60 24 .. . 5-19-61 36

610-147-6................. 32 3-14-56 15 74 3-14-56 13 ........ ...... . ... ..... ........

610-147-7. ................ 50 7-29-56 18 ..............

610-147-9...................... 51 3-25-58 59 ........ 1-19-59 50 .................................................... 610-147-11.............. . 20 8-20-57 1,430 90 8-20-57 24 156 8-21-57 965 ........ 12- 3-59 615 44 -20-57 22 110 8-20-57 18 ........ 5- 4-59 352 ........ 1-6-60 470 60 8-20-57 43 141 8-20-57 385 ........ 6- 8-59 340 ......... 3-29-60 1,020
610-147-12 ................ 17 -21-57 29 61 8-21-57 73 100 8-22-57 69 ........ 3-26-58 72

40 8-21-57 23 80 8-22-57 55 133 8-22-57 67

610-147-13............... 16 3-19-68 18 24 3-19-58 19 63 3-19-58 18 ...........................

610-147-22................ 142 3-29-60 20 ........ 4-26-61 50 ......... 5-18-61 38 ........ 7-14-61 34 .3-15-61 24 ........ 5- 2-61 26 ........ 6-16-61 32

610-147-23................. 64 3- 7-52 11 157 3-14-56 28 ........ 3-29-60 14 ........ 5-19-61 46

84 3- 7-52 8 ......... 3-20-58 25 ........ S-15-61 24 6-16-61 39

120 3-14-58 18 ........ 2-13-50 21 ........ 3-13-61 14 ........ 7-14-61 34

130 3-14-56 17 ........ 3- 4-59 17 ........ 4-26-61 58 ........ -11-61 34

140 3-14-56 16 ........ 12- 3-59 21

610-148-1................. 33 8-16-56 22 59 8-16-56 25 ........ ................ .................... ........

610-148-2............. . 60 8-16-56 18 166 5- 4-59 79 166 3-13-61 34 166 5-19-61 48 123 3-20-58 16 166 6- 8ý59 60 168 4-26-61 40 166 6-16-61 40

145 3-20-58 32 166 3-20-60 44 166 5- 2-61 42 166 7-14-61 38

166 3-20-58 85 166 8-15-60 68

610-148-................. 35 8-17-56 14 58 8-17-56 13 ........ ........... ..... ..................

611-147-7................. 14 11-12-59 34 ... . ......... ....... .............. ......... . ... ... . ..

611-148-2................. 14 11-12-59 30 ..... .. .... ... .. .... .. ..... . . ....... .... ... ...... ........

612-146-1 .............. ..... 28 7-29-58 67 72 7-30-58 78 100 7-30-58 97 123 7-30-58 151

48 7-29-58 90

612-147-1 ................. 55 11-13-58 28 ............... ..................................................... ........

612-148-4................ . 14 11-11-59 24 .......... ..... ........ . . ... .... . .... ..

613-147-1................. 60 11-13- 8 4 .................. ... ....... . . .... .. . ...... .. . .... .

614-146-1...... ....... 20 11-18-68 70 61 11-18-58 176 82 11-18-58 260 103 11-19-58 260

614-147-1 ................. 60 11-13-58 38 ........ ....... .... . ............. . .. ......... ..... ...................

614-147-2................. 14 11-11-59 19 ........ . . .. . ..... ... .... . .... . .. ............ .... .

614-148-1................. 14 11-11-59 18 . . . .. . . .. . ...... . ....

615-146-3 ................. 70 3-29-3 0 190 ........ ..... . ...............

615-147-21... ............. 100 3-28-60 314 ... ....................... . ........ . .

615-147-2 ................ 61 3-28-60 200 . . .. . ........ ......

15--147-3 ................ 6.7 3-28-60 530 ............ ]c
'1'A111 4,-(Coutiiluuld)

D)loth Chla. Depth COlo- e. pt)l COhl- Popth Ch1lo

Well IniBzi1roi (foot) DaItao ide (fuot) Dato ridl (foot) )Dto rido (foot) Date ride

015-147-4 , . ,,,,,,,,,,, ,, 7 8 g-ai - o0 10 , . . ., , , , . . , ., , . , . , . ... ,* ., , . .,

015-147-5 ................. 3-0-10 200. . ....... .. 

015-148-1 ........ ..... .., 14 11-11-5fi 61 ... .... . . .. .......... .. .... ...

010-141-1 .................. 2 7-18-58 87

010-141-2, .,..,........,,, 25 7-20-50 28 00 7-20-50 72 140 7-20-50 140 2.10 8-3-50 1,150

40 7-20-50 40

010-145-1 ..,,,........... 58 7-20-58 275 .................................................

010-140-2 . .. .......... ... 50 3-23-60 200 ........ .......... ..... . ...... ... . .......... ........ ..... ....

017-140-1................. 20 11-21-58 45 80 12-21-58 044 100 12-21-58 2,400 141 12-21-58 2,100 C

44 11-24-58 51 82 12-21-58 000

i
GROUND-WATER RESOURCES OF COUIxER COUNTY, FLORIDA 51

Chemical analyses of water samples from wells along the coastal ridge

indicate the presence of a hard limestone water that is suitable, for most

uses, with or without chemical treatment. As ground water must seep

through a considerable thickness of sand and rock to reach the producing

zones in the aquifer, it is generally free of harmful bacteria and suspended material. However, it dissolves some of the rocks through which

it moves and this action is aided by the presence of carbon dioxide

which is absorbed by rainfall from the atmosphere and from organic material in the soil. Calcium and bicarbonate, from the solution on calcium

carbonate in the limestone, are the principal ions in ground water in most

of the coastal ridge area.

The high mineral content of the ground water east of the coastal

strip is due primarily to constituents derived from sea water, in addition to the calcium and bicarbonate derived from the limestone in the

aquifer. The chloride content of the water ranges from less than 100 ppm

to more than 2,000 ppm and may come from three possible sources: (1)

Direct movement inland from the sea and along tidal reaches of streams;

(2) residual sea water left in the sediments at the time of deposition or

during former invasions of the sea; and (3) upward movement of salty

water from deeper artesian aquifers.

SALT-WATER CONTAMINATION

Under normal conditions, coastal aquifers discharge fresh ground

water into the ocean at or seaward of the coastline. Large withdrawals of

ground water from these aquifers can cause the seaward movement to

decrease or reverse, thereby causing salt water to enter the aquifer and

move inland to contaminate the wells. This phenomenon is called saltwater intrusion or salt-water encroachment.

Considerable study has been made of the phenomenon. The GhybenHerzberg theory assumed (1) that an interface exists between fresh and

salt water due to the difference in their densities, (2) no flow is present

in either the fresh- or salt-water zone, and (3) the water table slopes

seaward. From these assumptions the following equation was developed:

hf Z=---

Ps-Pf

where Z = depth to salt water, in feet below mean sea level; hf = height

of fresh water, in feet above mean sea level; and Ps - Pf = the difference

in densities of salt water and fresh water. If standard figures are inserted

for the two densities, the equation becomes:

Z = 40 hf
52 FLORIDA GEOLOGICAL SURVEY-BULLETIN THIRTY-ONE

LAND SURFACE

_ 

WATER -TABL E

MEAN SEA LEVE L _ 

FRESH WATER

EXPLA1ATION

h .h.iqht af frsh atr.. in

Adepth to salt. water. in feet ,

Figure 28. Idealized sketch of fresh-water and salt-water distribution in an unconfined coastal aquifer to illustrate the Ghyben-Herzberg relation.

According to this principle, for every foot of fresh ground-water head

above mean sea level in coastal aquifers there will be 40 feet of fresh

water below mean sea level (fig. 28).

However, this principle assumes that the fresh water is static and for

this reason gives only approximately the position of the interface. An

exact equation for determining the shape and position of the interface

with a known rate of discharge of fresh water under one set of boundary

conditions (fig. 29) has been devised by Glover (1959) for an analogous

problem of free-surface gravity flow:

y'- 2Q x- Q

2 =0

rk yk2

x = distance measured horizontally landward from shoreline (feet).

y = distance measured vertically downward from sea level (feet).

Q = fresh-water flow per unit length of shoreline (square feet per second).

k = permeability of the strata carrying the fresh-water flow (feet per second).

-y = excess of the specific gravity of sea water over fresh water (dimensionless).

Figure 29 is a comparison of Glover's interface with that of

Ghyben-Herzberg. Because the interface is in a hydrodynamic rather than

a hydrostatic balance, it is farther seaward.
GROUND-WATER RESOURCES OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 53

Land

_ -Woter taoble sufc - Sea level-.&

Sol er" te r

-- 0--`1 ea--

Figure 29. Sketch showing the fresh-water-salt-water interface according to the

potential theory and the Ghyben-Herzberg principle.

Kohout (1960) showed, from field observations made at Miami, that

the actual salt-water interface is farther seaward than is indicated by

either principle in figure 29, not only because of seaward flow of the

fresh ground water, but also because of the cyclic flow within the saltwater front. Cooper (1959) expressed the hypothesis of salt-water cyclic

flow and referred to the salt-water-fresh-water contact not as an interface but as a zone of diffusion wherein salt water moves inland along

the aquifer floor, moves upward into the zone of diffusion, and then

returns to the sea.

From the above brief and general history of salt-water encroachment

studies, it can be seen that the Ghyben-Herzberg relation will give the

maximum extent that the salt-water front will move inland under a

specific set of hydrologic conditions.

In Collier County, contamination of the ground water by salt-water

encroachment has occurred chiefly in coastal areas adjacent to major

streams and drainage canals that flow to the ocean. These waterways

enhance the possibility of sea-water encroachment in two ways: (1)

They lower ground-water levels, thereby reducing the fresh-water head

opposing the inland movement of sea water; and (2) they provide access for sea water to move inland during dry periods. for sea water to move inland durinig dry periods.
54 FLORIDA GEOLOGICAL SURVEY-BULLETIN THIRTY-ONE

RECENT AND RESIDUAL ENCROACHMENT

The Naples area is vulnerable to two types of salt-water contamination: (1) Sea water can move laterally inland directly from the Gulf of

Mexico, Naples Bay, and the lower part of the Gordon River that is

affected by tides; and (2) chemical analyses (table 3) indicate that salty

water at depth east of Naples is probably residual sea water trapped

during the deposition of the sediments or that it entered the sediments

when the sea covered the Naples area during Pleistocene time.

Examples of both types of encroachment are shown by data collected

during the drilling of well 610-147-11, east of the well-field extension and

near the upper tidal reach of the Gordon River (fig. 14, 15). Chloride

analyses of water samples taken from test well 610-147-11, as shown in

figure 14, indicate that salt water from the Gordon River had infiltrated

downward to a depth of about 25 feet below msl in the uppermost limestone bed of the aquifer. The salt-water contamination from the

river was reported to have caused the loss of several rows of litchi trees

near the river in the Caribbean Botanical Gardens (fig. 21).

Litholigic and chloride data from well 610-147-11 (fig. 14, sec. E-E')

show that the uppermost layer of limestone is underlain by 10 feet of

marl which separates shallow water of high chloride content from deeper

water of low chloride content. The difference in the quality of the water

may be caused by either, or a combination, of the following factors:

(1) The marl layer is sufficiently impermeable to form an effective seal

between the upper and lower limestones; (2) well 610-147-11 is near the

Gordon River, a discharge area, and the pressure head in the lower part

of the aquifer is greater than it is in the shallow part, thus preventing the

downward movement of salty water.

The high chloride content below 130 feet in well 610-147-11 indicates

that salt water has moved inland beneath the Gordon River, presumably as a result of local lowering of the ground-water levels in the adjacent drainage area. The fluctuation of chloride content of water samples collected periodically from a depth of 156 feet below the land

surface reflects the movement of the salt front deep in the aquifer in

response to changes in ground-water levels (table 3). The low chloride

content of the water at a depth of 135 feet in well 610-147-12 (table 4)

indicates that in 1958 the deep salt wedge had not reached that well.

The extent of the salt-water encroachment at depth in the Cocohatchee River basin has not been determined because of the lack of

deep observation wells near the lower reaches of the river. However,

the presence of water containing 664 ppm of chloride at a depth of 60
GROUND-WATER RESOURCES OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 55

feet and 2,400 ppm of chloride at a depth of 103 feet below the land

surface in well 617-146-1 suggests the possibility of recent encroachment

beneath canals that extend inland from the river. A determination of the

origin of this high chloride content can be made by periodic sampling of

the well and complete chemical analysis of the water.

Extensive encroachment from the sea has not occurred west of the

well field, although water levels in the area are lowered by pumping

in the well field and numerous canals extend inland from the gulf. However, inland movement of salt water is indicated by a fluctuation of

chloride content of samples, taken periodically from March 1958 to July 1961, that ranged between 34 and 85 ppm at a depth of 166 feet in well

610-148-2.

Major encroachment probably is being retarded by the high groundwater levels (fig. 16, 18, 19). The hydrographs of wells 610-148-2 and

610-147-11 correlate closely; accordingly, the long-term hydrograph of

well 610-147-11 (fig. 16) suggests that the water levels in well 610-148-2

probably averaged between 4 and 5 feet above sea level during the

period 1958 through September 1959, a period of heavy rainfall and above

normal ground-water levels. The head of fresh ground water above sea

level would indicate that fresh water extends to the base of the aquifer

at this point. Encroachment may be retarded also by beds of marl in the

aquifer, which probably extend seaward under the gulf.

Although the encroachment of salt water toward the well field has

been slight, the salt-water front near well 610-148-2 indicates that longterm lowering of ground-water levels caused by extension of the canal

system or increased pumping during a long dry period might cause encroachment that would endanger the well field.

Because the chloride content of the water is an indicator of changes

in mineral content, the data in figure 27 show that highly mineralized

water occurs north of Naples near the Cocohatchee River and east of

the coastal ridge as much as 10 miles inland from the coast. Comparison

of water-level contour maps (fig. 18, 19) and the topography of the area

indicates that ground-water levels east of the ridge range from 5 to 15 feet

above sea level. The lines of equal chloride content in figures 13, 14, and

15 show that the chloride content of the ground water increases gradually

with depth in the eastern part of the area, but rather sharply in material

of low permeability near the bottom of the aquifer. The high water levels

and the inland location of the Big Cypress area indicate that the high

mineral content of the ground water in that area is not caused by the

recent encroachment of sea water. The high mineral content of ground

water in materials of low permeability in the lower part of the aquifer
56 FLORIDA GEOLOGICAL SURVEY-BULLETIN THIRTY-ONE

suggests that the source of contamination is connate salt water or upward

leakage from the deeper artesian aquifer.

Ground water in the shallow aquifer along the southwestern and

southern coast of Collier County is highly mineralized. The water levels

in the area are not high enough to impede salt-water intrusion from the

gulf.

Poor flushing of the ground water within the shallow aquifer probably

accounts for the high mineralization of the ground water in the interior

of the county. The lack of flushing is caused partly by dense beds of

relatively impermeable limestones at shallow depths retarding the infiltration of rainfall. Poor flushing because of retarded rainfall infiltration

is exhibited east of Naples where ground water from shallow depths has

a high chloride content and surface water has a low chloride content.

Also in this area, the water-table gradient is almost flat except adjacent

to tidal streams and Naples Bay. The data obtained from wells 616-141-1

and 616-141-2 indicate drainage in the inland areas can improve the

quality of the ground water in the shallow aquifer. Well 616-141-1 was

drilled July 18, 1958 near a drainage canal which had been completed

prior to that date. At a depth of 26 feet the chloride content of water

from the well was 87 ppm. Well 616-141-2 was drilled July 29, 1959 about

100 yards east and the same distance from the canal. At a depth of

26 feet the chloride content of water from the well was 38 ppm, indicating that the construction of the canal had steepened the water-table

gradient and caused considerable flushing during the 1-year period.

UPWARD LEAKAGE

Test-drilling information indicates that head differentials large enough

to cause upward leakage do not exist in the shallow aquifer in the county

except in the coastal ridge area in Naples. Moreover, in the central part

of the county, the chloride content of the ground water is relatively low

throughout the entire thickness of the aquifer, which indicates that

contamination would not take place even if upward leakage did exist.

Data pertaining to the possibility of upward leakage of salt water

from deep water-bearing strata were collected during the drilling of well

616-141-2 in the northwestern part and well 609-115-1 in the central

part of the county. Well 616-141-2 was drilled to a depth of 300 feet in

January 1959. The analyses of water samples collected at 46 feet and

240 feet below the land surface are given in table 3. Materials of very

low permeability were penetrated between the base of the shallow aquifer

(about 130 feet below the land surface) and a permeable bed at 230 to

240 feet below the land surface, from which the lower sample was taken.
GROUND-WATER RESOURCES OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 57

Water levels measured as drilling progressed in the section of low permeability ranged from 5.4 to 14.8 feet below the land surface. Water levels

in both the shallow aquifer and the lower permeable zone were less

than 1 foot below the land surface. Water-level measurements in all zones

were made under the same conditions. The extremely high mineral content of the lower sample from well 616-141-2 indicates a source for contamination of the shallow aquifer from below but the head differential

between the two levels suggests that no upward flow was occurring.

Well 609-115-1 was drilled to a total depth of 700 feet in September

1959. When the well was 28 feet deep, the water level was 0.41 foot

below the land surface and the chloride content was 25 ppm. When

the well was 485 feet deep, the water level was 32 feet above the land

surface and the chloride content was 985 ppm. This indicates that upward leakage can take place from the lower, more mineralized Floridan

aquifer into the overlying shallow aquifer if the confining beds separating

the two aquifers are thin. Leaky casing penetrating the Floridan aquifer

also can permit upward leakage.

SUMMARY

The Floridan aquifer underlies all of Collier County and wells penetrating the aquifer flow except in the area of high dunes on Marco

Island. However, except in the town of Everglades and vicinity, the

ground water from the Floridan aquifer is highly mineralized and unsuitable for drinking. The Tampa Formation of late Miocene Age is the chief

source of water for the Floridan aquifer in Collier County. The top of the

aquifer is about 400 feet below the land surface.

The shallow aquifer is the principal source of fresh ground water in

Collier County. It comprises the Pamlico Sand, Anastasia Formation, and

permeable limestones of the Tamiami Formation. Marl beds of varying

thicknesses in the upper portion of the aquifer restrict the vertical permeability in certain parts of the county. The shallow aquifer extends from

the land surface to about 130 feet below in the northwestern part of

Collier County, to about 90 feet in the southern part, and to about 60

feet in the central and northeastern parts. The aquifer thins to a featheredge along the Dade-Broward County boundary.

Ground water in the shallow aquifer in the Naples area is of good

quality, containing about 250 ppm of dissolved solids. This is due in part

to the high fresh-water head adjacent to the coast and the resultant

flushing of ground water.

The ground water of the shallow aquifer in the same coastal communities in Collier County is unsuitable for drinking because of contamination
58 FLORIDA GEOLOGICAL SURVEY-BULLETIN THIRTY-ONE

by salt water. Ground water is available in the interior of the county but

it is highly mineralized owing to poor flushing of the aquifer. High concentrations of chloride in the area east and northeast of Naples are due

to poor flushing of the aquifer and to residual salt-water contamination.

The results of aquifer tests indicate that the shallow aquifer will produce large quantities of water with moderate drawdowns in water levels,

especially in areas where surface water can recharge the aquifer. The

topography, drainage pattern, and hydraulic characteristics of the shallow

aquifer in northwestern Collier County indicate that supplies equal to

present water needs can be developed along the eastern edge of the

coastal ridge and the adjacent drainageway. Additional supplies can be

developed from the same area by the use of infiltration in conjunction

with the drainage of inland areas. Present and future well fields may be

safeguarded from salt-control dams near the gulf in major streams.

A continuing appraisal of the quantity and quality of water in storage

in northwestern Collier County will be needed for the maximum development of the area. The immediate need is for water-level and streamflow

data for use in the design of a comprehensive water-control system.

Studies of flood-control and drainage systems in southeastern Florida

have shown that, with proper location and operation of salinity controls

and carefully planned overall drainage systems, large inland areas can be

developed for urban or agricultural use without depletion of essential

ground-water resources.
GROUND-WATER RESOURCES OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 59

REFERENCES

Bishop, E. W.

1956 Geology and ground-water resources of Highlands County, Florida:

Florida Geol. Survey Rept. Inv. 15.

Cooke, C. W. (also see Parker, G. G.)

1945 Geology of Florida: Florida Geol. Survey Bull. 29.

Cooper, H. H., Jr.

1959 A hypothesis concerning the dynamic balance of fresh water and

salt water in a coastal aquifer: Jour. Geophys. Research, v. 64,

no. 4, p. 461-467.

Davis, J. H.

1943 The natural features of southern Florida, especially the vegetation

and the Everglades: Florida Geol. Survey Bull. 25.

Ferguson, G. E. (see Parker, G. G.)

Glover, R. E.

1959 The pattern of fresh-water flow in a coastal aquifer: Jour. Geophys.

Research, v. 64, no. 4, p. 457-459.

Hantush, M. C.

1956 Analysis of data from pumping tests in leaky aquifers: Am. Geophys.

Union Trans., v. 37, no. 6, p. 702-714.

Jacob, C. E.

1946 Radial flow in a leaky artesian aquifer: Am. Geophys. Union

Trans., v. 27, no. 2, p. 199.

Klein, Howard (also see Schroeder, M. C.; Sherwood, C. B.)

1954 Ground-water resources of the Naples area, Collier County, Florida:

Florida Geol. Survey Rept. Inv. 11.

Kohout, F. A.

1960 Cyclic flow of salt water in the Biscayne aquifer of southeastern

Florida: Jour. Geophys. Research, v. 65, no. 7, p. 2133-2141.

Lichtler, W. F.

1960 Geology and ground-water resources of Martin County, Florida:

Florida Geol. Survey Rept. Inv. 23.

Love, S. K. (see Parker, G. G.)

Meinzer, O. E.

1923 The occurrence of ground water in the United States, with a discussion of principles; U.S. Geol. Survey Water-Supply Paper 489.

Parker, G. G.

1944 (and Cooke, C. W.) Late Cenozoic geology of southern Florida,

with a discussion of the ground water: Florida Geol. Survey Bull.

27.

1951 Geologic and hydrologic factors in the perennial yield of the

Biscayne aquifer: Am. Water Works Assoc. Jour., v. 43, p. 817-834.

Parker, G. G.

1955 (and Ferguson, G. E., Love, S. K., et al.) Water resources of

southeastern Florida, with special reference to the geology and

ground water of the Miami area: U.S. Geol. Survey Water-Supply

Paper 1255.
60 FLORIDA GEOLOGICAL SURVEY-BULLETIN THIRTY-ONE

Puri, H. S.

1959 (and Vernon, R. O.) Summary of the geology of Florida and a

guidebook to the classic exposures: Florida Geol. Survey Spec. Pub. 5.

Rorabaugh, M. I.

1956 Ground water in northeastern Louisville, Kentucky, with reference

to induced infiltration: U.S. Geol. Survey Water-Supply Paper 1360-

B.

Schroeder, M. C.

1954 (and Klein, Howard) Geology of the western Everglades area,

southern Florida: U.S. Geol. Survey Circ. 314.

1961 (and Klein, Howard) Ground-water resources of northwestern Collier County, Florida: Florida Geol. Survey Inf. Circ. 29.

Stewart, H. G., Jr.

1959 Interim report on the geology and ground-water resources of northwestern Polk County, Florida: Florida Geol. Survey Inf. Circ. 23.

Stringfield, V. T.

1936 Artesian water in the Florida peninsula: U.S. Geol. Survey WaterSupply Paper, 773-C.

Theis, C. V.

1938 The significance and nature of the cone of depression in groundwater bodies: Econ. Geology, v. 33, no. 8, p. 889-902.

Todd, D. K.

1959 Ground-water hydrology: New York, John Wiley & Sons.

U.S. Public Health Service.

1961 Drinking water standards: Am. Water Works Jour., v. 53, no. 8,

p. 939-945.

U.S. Public Health Service

1961 Drinking water standards: Am. Water Works Jour., v. 53, no. 8,

p. 939-945.

Vaughan, T. W.

1910 A contribution to the history of the Floridian Plateau: Carnegie

Inst. Washington Pub. 133, Papers Tortugas Lab., v. 4, p. 99-185.

Vernon, R. O. (see Puri, H. S.)
GROUND-WATER RESOURCES OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 61

WELL LOGS

WELL 554-143-1

Depth, in feet

Material below land surface

Beach sand, shell, and fill material ...................... ... 0............ 0- 13

Sand, quartz, fine, shelly, last 3 feet containing greenish marl ..... 13 - 33

Sand, quartz, fine; dark green marl, less shell than above ............ 33- 44

Limestone, gray to white, hard, shelly .................................. 44- 58

Limestone, tan to white, ranging from soft to very soft; light tangreen marl streaks at 128 feet and 153 feet .............................. 58- 193

Sand, quartz, fine to coarse, cemented with CaCOa, quartz grains

are well rounded; greenish marl -.......-.............. .......... .............. 193- 273

Clay, green, marly, sandy, some shell from above; clay becomes

harder at 330 feet -...................... ............................ ......-------. 273 - 343

Limestone, yellow, crystalline; phosphatic material; some clay .... 343- 353

Limestone, white, shelly, phosphatic, marly; becomes softer at 373

feet .................................................................................. .. 353 - 404

WELL 556-128-1

Depth, in feet

Material below land surface

Sand, quartz, marly .................................. .....................- .. 0- 12

Limestone, gray to white, shelly, Pecton shells ...................... .... 12 -162

Limestone, buff to gray; coarse, quartz sand; shell; marl ........... 162- 252

Limestone, buff to gray, shelly; green clay ...................................... 252 - 262

Clay, marly, sandy, bluish gray, shell ...... ................. 262-292 2................ 

Clay, dense, tight dark green, becoming sandy at 325 feet, phosphatic at 348 feet, and hard zone at 365 .................................. 292- 376

Limestone, light gray to dirty white, marly, phosphatic ............... 376 - 392

Note: Well was drilled with rotary drill rig. Samples were washed free of drilling

mud, thereby any sand or silt-size particles were removed.

WELL 559-120-1

Depth, in feet

Material below land surface

Sand, brown, organic, and limestone fill rock ............................... 0- 10

Limestone, light tan to white, soft, permeable ............................. 10- 44

Sand, quartz, fine to medium, brown; white limestone ..--------...... 44- 50

Sand, quartz, fine to medium, brown .................................... 50 - 150

Sand, quartz, fine to medium, brown; green clay ...................-....... 105- 126

WELL 606-143-1

Depth, in feet

Material below land surface

Limestone, light gray to buff, very hard, sandy, marly --.............. 0- 20

Shell, hash, cream to buff, marly, soft ...--..--------- ........................ 20- 30

Limestone, light tan, shelly, phosphatic; permeable ............ 30 - 60

Limestone, light gray, sandy, some shell, soft; hard zone at 100

feet ---..-..................------------------------------- 60-127

Limestone, light cream to dark gray, soft, sandy shelly ------... . 127- 142
62 FLORIDA GEOLOGICAL SURVEY-BULLETIN THIRTY-ONE

WELL 607-145-1

Depth, in feet

Material below land surface

Sand, quartz, surface --------- - 0- 9

Marl, dark, hard _____ __ 9- 13

Sand, quartz, fine to medium, marly, very shelly _.__ 13- 25

Limestone, white to dark gray, shelly sandy, permeable --....... 25- 92

Sand, quartz, very fine, gray to tan . _ --- 92- 115

Sand, quartz, very fine to medium, tan to green, phosphatic ...--. 115- 141

WELL 609-115-1

Depth, in feet

Material below land surface

Sand, black, organic, marly, shelly -.... 0- 24

Sand, quartz, fine, shelly; small amount of limestone .......- ......- 24- 56

Sand, quartz, buff to pink, phosphatic; fossiliferous limestone .... 56- 66

Sand, quartz, very fine, shelly, phosphatic -- -.--- 66- 76

Sand, quartz, fine to coarse, white to light gray phosphatic ...... 76- 112

Sand, quartz, very fine, phosphatic; green clay ..------.----..-....---.. 112- 132

Clay, green, tight; quartz sand, decreasing in lower part -............. 132 - 158

Clay, gray-green, hard; very coarse, phosphatic, quartz sand;

greenish material at 200 feet may be phosphatic, crystalline

limestone or iron-bearing silica -----..--- -- .. 158-238

Clay, gray-green, sandy, phosphatic, shelly --- --...-.--....-- ..... 238-244

Shell, hash; quartz sand loosely cemented with CaCO.; 3-foot thick

layer of clay at 261 feet _... --......- ------..------.......--....- 244-290

Clay, bluish green, sandy, shelly, phosphatic _ _---__- - 290- 400

Limestone, light gray, friable or "rotten," shelly; abundance of

shell hash at 425-435 feet __ _ __- __-_ 400-485

Limestone, very light gray to cream, sandy, phosphatic ........--.-.. 485- 530

Limestone, light gray, shelly, phosphatic, clayey .... - 530- 570

Clay, green, tight, shelly; light gray limestone -------.. .. ...-...-...- . 570- 575

Limestone, light gray to white, phosphatic, clayey; varying amounts

of shell with depth; very hard limestone zone 3-4 feet thick at

587 feet ___ -_____ -------.... -____- 575 - 700

WELL 609-120-1

Depth, in feet

Material below land surface

Limestone, light tan, very hard, fossiliferous; very hard ...... 0- 30

Limestone, white to light tan, shelly; pink coating on shells ...-..... 30- 38

Limestone, white, phosphatic -__- _.--.-- 38- 40

Sand quartz, very fine, white _ _ 40- 72

Limestone, white to light gray phosphatic, sandy 72-103

Sand, quartz, silt-size to very coarse, clayey _ .- 103- 122

WELL 613-148-1

Depth, in feet

Material below land surface

Sand, fine to medium, brown; organic material -___ 0- 22

Limestone, light gray, sandy, shelly, marly 22- 44
GROUND-WATER RESOURCES OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 63

Limestone, gray, sandy; greenish shelly clay; phosphatic nodules -_ 44 - 48

Limestone, gray, shelly, sandy, phosphatic; permeable .................... 48- 72

Limestone, white, friable, granular; permeable ..........------........ ..-- 72- 128

Limestone, light gray, sandy, some shell .--................-- -------------...... 128 - 136

Sand, quartz, fine to very fine, white ---...-----...... .........----.. -------.. . 136 - 142

WELL 614-146-1

Depth, in feet

Material below land surface

Sand, quartz, yellow .-----..---...........-........... . -----------........ 0- 4

Sand, quartz, fine, gray; indurated gray limestone ...........------..-... 4- 17

Limestone, gray, sandy, shelly, permeable ...--...--.......---.................. 17- 89

Sand, quartz, fine, dark gray, phosphatic, marly ....................-------- 39- 44

Limestone, dark gray, sandy, shelly ....-----....-----------------. 44- 85

Sand, quartz, medium, limy ....---............--------------. 85- 115

WELL 616-131-1

Depth, in feet

Material below land surface

Sand, dark-brown, organic .--.............----..---........ .....---..----..- 0- 10

Limestone, sandy, light tan to gray ..-...-................-------.......... --- . 10- 20

Limestone, light gray, clay, sandy -.--..----..-.............---------------.... 20- 40

Clay, green, soft; light gray limestone ....------.....--------............ . 40- 60

Clay, green, soft, sandy, shelly ......................---- .--- ......... 60- 80

Limestone, light to dark gray, hard, shelly, phosphatic and sandy

in lower part; very permeable ------............ --. ............... ----...--. 80- 130

WELL 616-141-2

Depth, in feet

Material below land surface

Limestone fill rock and sand .........------......... ---------------- 0- 10

Shell, hash, cream colored; limestone, marly ...........--....----- --.... . 10- 35

Limestone, light cream, shelly, phosphatic --..---..--..-............---... --.. 35- 46

Limestone, white to dark gray; light green clay in varying

amounts .---............ ------------....---.----------------------------- 46- 90

Limestone, gray, sandy; sand-filled cavity at 105 feet .---..........----- 90 -150

Clay, gray-green, soft, sandy, phosphatic ............--- .....-......-----------. . 150- 160

Limestone, light cream, sandy, phosphatic ---..-..........------------..... 160- 170

Limestone, very shelly, clayey, and phosphatic; clay increasing -... 170- 220

Limestone, white and gray, clayey, phosphatic .--...--..---....... ....------- 220- 240

Clay, green, sandy, phosphatic; gray limestone -..----..........---------... . 240- 270

Clay, green, sandy, hard ----.............-.......--.---.......-......-. .------- 270- 300

WELL 617-146-1

Depth, in feet

Material below land surface

Sand, quartz, dark, organic ..- ..----------.........-- .....--- ..----- 0- 1

Limestone, gray, fossiliferous, very hard, impermeable ..--------..... 1- 23

Sand, quartz, medium, gray to white, shelly; dark gray to tan

limestone -.---------------- ------- -------------- 23- 55

Clay, dark green ---...............------ -------------------------------- 55- 75

Marl, green, shelly limestone in lower part; permeable ---.--..----..- 75- 94
64 FLORIDA GEOLOGICAL SURVEY-BULLETIN THIRTY-ONE

Limestone, white; sandy in lower part; permeable -_____ ---- - 94 - 121

Sand, quartz, very fine, white phosphatic --- 121 - 141

WELL 621-135-2

Depth, in feet

Material below land surface

Fill material __ __-- ____ 0- 10

Sand, quartz, medium, tan; gray limestone; shell in lower part --.. 10- 40

Clay, marly, shelly, greenish tan _.- -__--_ --- 40- 60

Limestone, dark gray, shelly, becoming sandy in lower part --...- 60- 90

Sand, quartz, very fine, limy, clayey, phosphatic .._-.....- - 90- 95

Limestone, buff-colored, phosphatic, sandy, becoming shelly in last

7 feet; permeable _ _ -- ___ . _ 95- 123

WELL 621-136-5

Depth, in feet

Material below land surface

Sand, quartz, fill material, and organic material ___ 0- 10

Shell, tan, hash, fill material ..__ ..... ........ _ _ ...... 10- 20

Limestone, light gray and shell hash ____ 20- 30

Limestone, light gray, sandy, marly, becoming harder and darker

gray at bottom; permeable -------- 30- 55

Limestone, gray to white, with greenish gray clay, sand, and

phosphatic material in lower part; permeable - _- 55-118

Sand, quartz, very fine; white and gray limestone fragments .--.. 118- 120

Sand, quartz, fine, white _____- - -.-------- -.------- 120- 130

WELL 622-125-2

Depth, in feet

Material below land surface

Sand, quartz, fine to medium, organic material ... 0_-_. - 10

Sand, quartz, fine, gray, marly, phosphatic, clay in lower part _- 10- 35

Marl, sandy, green, phosphatic 35- 48

Limestone, white to gray; fine to medium quartz sand, abundance

of white and black shell fragments __-- _ 48- 53

Sandstone, probably CaCO, cement _-___ 53 - 60

Sand, quartz, medium to coarse, becoming finer _ _ 60- 120

WELL 625-123-3

Depth, in feet

Material below land surface

Surface sand, fill, and organic matter .. --... _-- ......... - ...... .. 0- 10

Sand, quartz, fine, dirty white, becoming whiter with depth; marl,

light brown, decreasing in amount with depth; phosphatic material in lower part _-------_-___ 10- 37

Sand, quartz, fine, gray -____ _ _------____ _ 37- 70

Sand, quartz, medium to coarse, gray, phosphatic material 70- 80

Sand, quartz, medium, poorly consolidated, marly 80- 90

Clay, greenish gray, sandy, marly, becomes green in lower part .. 90- 110

Sand, quartz, coarse, marly; tightly cemented sandstone in lower

part 110-129
GROUND-WATER RESOURCES OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 65

Sand, quartz, medium, marly; semi-indurated gray limestone ...._- 129- 145

Sand, quartz, coarse; phosphatic material; dark green soft clay in

lower part .......................... 145- 171

Clay, sandy, dark green; phosphatic material .... 171- 175

Clay, sandy, light gray; white limestone ---___ ......... _........ 175- 177

Limestone, white to buff, sandy, phosphatic material _ . 177- 190

Sand, quartz clear to gray, coarse; limestone fragments; phosphatic

material ----------- . _____ ... ----------....... _ 190 - 212

Clay, marly, light gray to green; fine to medium quartz sand;

phosphatic material ..--..........-----------....---...- -.... ... 212 - 303

WELL 626-123-1

Depth, in feet

Material below land surface

Sand, quartz, medium, brown, marly; organic material _ --.. ___ 0 - 10

Sand, quartz, medium, light brown, shelly, marly; becomes very

shelly in lower part ___......._ _ .............................. 10- 30

Sand, quartz, very fine, gray, phosphatic _ 30- 40

Sand, quartz, coarse, gray, clayey, phosphatic; contains corals;

sand becomes pebble size in lower part ---- __.-___ . ------...... 40- 60

Sand, quartz, very fine, light gray, phosphatic; becomes coarser

with dark green marl in lower part --_.---. -_---_-----......._ ...... 60- 100

Sand, quartz, coarse to pebble-size; sandstone; shell fragments;

dark green marly clay -- . . . -----.................... ____... -- .... 100-116

Sand, quartz, coarse to pebble-size; green marly clay -.----------. 116 - 140

Sand, quartz, very fine, gray, marly, clayey, phosphatic ..-----..... 140 - 150

WELL 626-126-1

Depth, in feet

Material below land surface

Sand, quartz, fine to medium, white to gray --........ _.. ....-. -. ... 0- 15

Sand, quartz, fine to very coarse, well rounded, white, becoming

finer in lower part ___ ____ _ 15- 41

Sand, quartz, fine, gray, with phosphatic material ---................. 41- 50

Sand, quartz, coarse to very coarse, white well rounded; phosphatic material ------......- ........ - --.................-.... --...... --. 50- 73

Sand, quartz, gravel-size, white to gray; phosphatic material ------- 73- 85

Sand, quartz, fine to very fine, white to pink; green-blue clay;

light brown to buff marl ____.-----..________ ___ 85- 95

Sand, quartz, fine, marly __ ... . ____. 95- 123
'I'Aurit 5. Well lucourds In Colltr County, Florid

Aquifer: I, shallow aquifer; P, Floridan aqulfer, Remarks: W- is the Florida Geological Survey well number,

Usel Pl, public supply; 0, oservation; D, domestic; T, test (if not noted in remarks section, it refers to a well drilled for water and earth smplesr); Ir, Irrigation; 8, stook; In, Industrial,

Casing Measuring point Water level Yield Chloride

Above

Year Depth Above Eleva or Team.

Well Owner Driller com. ofwell Aqui- or tion below pera- Use Remarks

number pleted (feet) Depth Diam. fer below above (-) Date of Gal- Parts D.e ,ture

(feet) eter Description land meau me&s measur- Ions per per sampled ('F)

(inches) surface sea uing ment minute million

(feet) level point

(feet)

680-126-1 Humble Oil Co...... May Bros......... 1941 506 160 4% F Top of 41-inch casing. 1.0 ..... 11.5 12-15-41 350 .............. 82 T Oil exploratory

630-123-1 Atlantio Coast Line.. ................... ............. ....... 4 F Top of 4-inch discharge pipe......... 2.0 ....... 1.4 10- 0-50 150 825 10-0-59 80 Ir

-2 do.,,....,,,, ...... .. ......... ... . ....... 4 F do ........... 1 . 10.0 1- 99 ..... 1,030 10- 9-59 80 Ir

-8 J. Houghteling...... B. and D. Well Lower edge of 21-inch

Drillers.......... 1950 6 48 3 8 elbow.......... . 1.5 ....... - 6.45 8-13-52 ....... ............... .... Ir

-4 do............ do........... 192 16 ....... 5 Top of 0-inch casing.. .5 ...... - 7.48 8-13-52 ....... 17 8-13-50 77 Ir

680-122-1 Atlantic Coast Line.. ..................... ............... 4 F Land surface........ .0 ....... 23.5 10- 9-50 150 1,100 10- 0-50 80.5 Ir

-2 J. Houghteling...... B. and D. Well Top of 3-inch

Drillers.......... 180 50 40 3 8 coupling........... 1.0 ....... - 4.40 8-13-52 ....... 17 8-13-52 ..... Ir

-3 do............ do............ 192 85 ....... 6 8 Top of 6-inch casing.. 1.3 ....... - 4.61 8-13-52 ....... ................. ...... Ir

- 4.74 10- 0-59

S629-12 ..................... J. H. Whatlcy........ ... 660 ....... 6 F Top of 6-inch discharge pipe........ 2.0 ..... 21.8 10- 0-50 200 ... 10- 0-89 80.4 Ir

629-127-1 Collier Corp........... ............ ....... 20 ....... 6 8 Top of 6-inch casing.. .0 ....... -10.35 5- 8-59 ...... 48 5- 8-59 ...... Ir

-2 do........... ......................... 2 ...... 6 8 do............ 1.0.......- .3 - ....... 35 5-8-50 ...... Ir

-8 do............................ ............ 8 .......................... ...... ....... ....... ....................................... Ir

-4 ................... J. M. Whatley.............. 1,11 ....... F Top of galvanized oxtension on discharge

Spipe ............ .7 ...... 11.7 10- 8-50 100 1,100 10- 8-59 84.5 Ir Flowing wild
029-120-1 Collier Corp......... .................... ....... 26 ....... 6 8 Top of 0-inch casing.. .0 ....... - 7.74 6- 8-95 ....... 83 5- 8-80 ...... Ir

629-14-1 Bud Fredricks....... Miller Bros.. .............. 55 ....... 6 8 ................................................. 700 38 5- 7-6 75.5 Ir

S -2 do............ do.......... ... ....... 8 ....... 6 8 ................. ............ .... ....... .... . ....... 48 5- 7-50 ..... Ir

620-122-1 Atlantic Land and Top of discharge

SImprovement Co.. J. M. Whatley...... 1988 702 304 6 F pipe............. 1.3 ....... 20.0 10- 9-59 90 080 10- 0-59 70 Ir

S -2 ........................ ... .................. 4 F' do........... 2 ...... 200 10- 9-59 100 1,120 10- 0-59 81 Ir

-3 ....................... . ......................... 4 F do........... 1.0 ....... 24.0 10- 9-59 ....... 1,090 10- 9-59 81 Ir

962f124-1 Bud Fredricks...... Paul Dukes......... ....... 45-55 30 6 8 ................. ....... ....... ................. 138 5- 7-59 75 Ir

/ -2 do............ ......................... 800? ....... 0 F Land surface........ .0 38 9.0 5- 7-59 50 520 5- 7-59 80 Ir

627-127-1 ..................... .......................... 750 ....... 4 F Top of 4-inch disScharge pipe........ 2.0 ....... 16.1 10- 8-50 15 1,120 10- 8-60 82.5 Ir

.627-120-1 University of Florida

Agricultural Experiment Station.. J.M. Whatley...... ...... 184 168 2 ...... Land surface......... 0 ......- 10.0 5- -50 ........................ ...... Ir

-2 do............ do............ 1957 184 ....... 2 ..... .................. .... .......... ....... .......... ....... 75 3-10-59 ...... Ir

;' ' - .................... do................. 682 ....... 6 F Top of 6-inch elbow... 1.6 ...... 19.2 10- 8-59 50 1,018 10- 8-50 83 Ir

6 27-126-1 , Stokes.............. .................. . 3 89 ....... 4 S Top of 4-inch casing.. 1.75 ....... - 7.26 6- 2-59 ....... 62 6- 2-59 ...... Ir

'. -2. do............ ................... .... 35 ...... 4 S Top of 4-inch unthreaded easing.... .88 ....... - 5.90 6- 2-59 ....... 30 6- 2-59 ...... Ir

626-127-1 Frank Corbett....... .................... 1058 40 40 1l S ................ ........... ... ....... 8 3 4-0 ...... Ir

:626-120-1 USGS............. Miller Bros......... 159 123 84 2 S Top of 2-inch casing.. 1.1 .... - 5.2 0-23-59 55 20 8-23-59 ...... T

i626-125-12 Kenneth Glidden.... ............ ........... 250 ....... 2 ...... ................. ........................... ...... 39 3-25-60 ...... D

-2 Knox Blount........ Dave Buschmann.... 1957 230 210 2 ........................... ................... ....... 19 3-25-59 ..... D

626-128-1 USGS............. Miller Bros ........ 1950 153 144 2 S Land surface......... 0 ....... - 4.34 7-12-590 .............. .......... .. T

626-121-1 Collier Corp........ Ray Messer......... 1 3 23 6 ...................... .... .. ................... ................ Ir

625-120-1 do............. MaysBros.......... 1941 753 228 4A F ................ ..... ....... ....... ....... ... 81 T Oil exploratory

-2 Tom Lynn.......... D.Buschmann...... 1957 227 200 1A ...... Land surface......... .0 ....... -18.0 8- -57 25 23 3- 4-50 ...... D

-3 R.M. Anderson..... do............ 1.57 6. 1 S ............ ......... . .. .............. 42 4- 5-59 ...... D

-4 do....do .... do.......... 1050 35 35 1X S ..................... ..................... ...... ... 25 4- 5-59 ..... D

, ,, 
TAPL~ 5. (Continued)

Cuiug Measuring point Water level Yield Chloride

Above

Year Depth Above Eleva- or Tern.

Well Owner Driller com- of well Aqui- or tion below pere. Use Remarks

number pleted (feet) Depth Diam. fer below above (-) Date of Gal- Parts Date ture

(feet) eter Description land mean mea- meuur. lons per per sampled ('F)

(inches) surface sea uring ment minute million

(feet) level point

(feet)

61 -125-1 H.E. M cDaniel.......... .......... . . 1040 196 ....... 4 ... .... ..................................... ..... ...... . ....... 4 -27-50 ...... D

-6 do. ...................................... 220 ....... 4 ...... ................................................. ....... 17 3-27-50 ..... D

-7 J.0. Dupree........ D.Bihmann....... 1057 130 125 1% ...... ..... ........................ ..... ................ 1 3-27-0 ...... D

-8 Chas.Scott......... O.B. Fowler...... 155 42 ....... 2 ...... ...... ............. ........................... 38 3-27-50 ...... D

-9 L. H. Grots......... D. Busm..... ...... 1052 180 ..................... .21 .............. ...... ........ ....... 48 3-27-50 ...... D

-10 Lloyd Brown.... . M. Whatley.... 1050 242 210 2 .............................. ....................... .... 50 3-27-50 ...... D

625-125-1 Collier County Board

ofPublic Instruction Fred'a Barn....... . 1058 250 103 4 . ..... ..................... ....................... 00 7 -13-5 ...... PS

-2 do............ J. M. Whatley...... 1957 187 ....... 4 S ............. .. ............... ....... .......... ...... 48 -1 ..... PS

-3 Immokalee Gas .... do.................. 125 70 1, S .................... ...... ........ .............. 80 40 5-17-58 ...... In

-4 Mr.Shirlin ........ D.Buschmann...... 1051 133 ....... 2 S ............... ......... .......................... ....... 47 3-25-59 ...... D

- Mrs. Bethear:....... do........... 1047 00 ,..... 2 S8 ......................... ...... ....... .......... ...... 35 3-27-5 ...... D

-6 doo........... do............ 1984 120 ...... 3 8 ................. ....... ............. ............... 70 3-27-50 ...... D

-7 do............ do............ 1054 120 ....... 3 8 ....................... ....... ........ ......... ...... 48 3-27-59 ...... D

625-124-1 Florida State Agriculture Marketing

Board............ J.M. Whatloy...... 1050 202 208 6 ...... Land surface........ ............... -13.5 4- -56 250 ................... .. In

-2 J.M. Whatley...... do................. 783 ....... 4 F do....... ... ............ 10.0 3-25-5 100 1,040 3-25-59 ...... In

-3 Atlantic Coast Line...................... 1010 500 ....... 6 F Top of 6-inch casing.. 1.5 ...... .0 10-22-40 ....... ....... .......... 70 In

625-123-1 Collier Corp....... .................... 1050 35 24 0 8 ................................ ............. ... ........ ...... ...... Ir

-2 , do.......................... . 1050 30 20 0 S ....................... .............. . ..... ....... ....... ........ ...... Ir

-3 USGS ............. Miller Bros..... 10590 03 284 3 8 Land surface.... ............. -10.88 7- 8-59 ...... 38 7- 8-50 ...... T
025-116-1 do............ B. and D. Well

Drillers.......... 1052 54 22 0 8 Top of 8-inch casing.. .0 ....... -2.77 6-11-52 ...... 06 0-11-50 ...... T

-2 Collier Corp..... . .............. ......... 51 ............. 8 Top casing .......... .5 ....... - 2.20 6-17-58 500 70 0-17-58 ...... Ir

624-125-1 Collier County Board

of Public Instruction J.M. Whatley...... 1050 278 218 4 ...... Land surface......... .0 ....... 4.0 2- -50 ....... 26 3-10-59 ...... PS

-2 Florida ForeatSrvice D.Buschmann...... 1058 107 104 4 8 do............. .0 ....... - 3.0 1056 100 24 8-18-59 ...... D

-3 Mrs. Carl MoPhail................... .. 154 100 ....... 2 8 ............. ......... .. ......... ......... ....... 08 3-27-50 ...... D

023-128-1 Collier Corp....................... .... ..... 37 ...... . 0' 8 Top of 6-inch casing.. .......... - 3.95 3-16-50 ....... 31 3-16-50 ...... 8

62-13-1 Humble Oil Co ..... Loffland Bros....... 1040 12:210 ........ ..................... . ......... ............. ...................... T Oil exploratory,

W-2103

622-126-1 Don Lucas ......... ........ ....... ... .... ... ... ...... . ............ ................ ........................ ....... 20 3-10-59 ...... D

-2 USG............... Miller Bros.......... 159 120 112 2 8 ............................. ...... ........... ... ....... 20 7-14-50 ...... T Chloride sample

taken at 50-53

foot interval

621-135-1 Collier Corp....... do................. 00 .. 8 8 Top of 8-inch casing.. .5 ...... - 2.35 3-24-50 ....... 34 3-24-59 ...... Ir

-2 U8S8S............. do........... 1059 120 120 2 8 Top of 2-inch casing.. .88....... - 2.38 7-24-50 ....... 38 7-24-50 ...... T Chloride sample

taken at 88-93

-3 Sam Shaw.......... ......................................... 8 ...... Top of 8-inch casing................ ....... .................................... foot interval

-4 do........................... .. .... .... ........... 8 ...... do................................ .............................

621-134-1 Collier Corp ..................... ....... 84 ....... 4 8 Top of 8-inch casing. .55 ...... - 2.74 3-24-50 ....... 4 3-24-5 ...... Ir

621-132-1 do...............,............ ... ..... 115 ....... 8 8 do............. . ..... - 1.68 3-24-50 ....... 85 3-24-50 ...... Ir

621-131-1 do........... ............ ....... ....... 92 ...... 8 8 do....... ............ - 4.30 3-16-50 ....... 51 3-10-59 ...... Ir

-2 do......... ........ .......... . ....... 112 ....... 8 8 do............ .5 ....... - 3.07 3-17-50 ...... 111 3-17-59 ...... Ir

-3 do............................. .... 10 ....... 8 8 do............ . .0 ....... - 1.74 3-24-59 ...... 57 3-24-50 ..... Ir

-4 do.......................... ....... 105 ....... 8 8 do........... ............. ......... . .....................

-5 U808G.............. Miller Bros......... 1050 130 123 2 8 ................... ..... ... ......... ......... ....... 44 7-21-50 ...... T

621-180-1 Collier County...................... . ....... 82 ...... 8 8 Top of 8-inch casing.. .0 ....... - 3.42 3-17-50 ....... 48 3-17-50 ...... Ir

620-135-1 do........... ..................... .... .......... 8 8 do.............. . ...... - 1.74 3-23-50 ....... 55 3-23-59 ...... Ir

610-130-1 Humble Oil Co...... Dorris Ballow....... 1040 11,000 ...... 20 ....................................... ... ........ ............... ..... T Oil exploratory,

W-1885

618-184-1 Collier Corp........ J.M. Whatloy...... ...... 18 ...... 8 8 Top of 8-inch casing.. .05 ....... - 108 3-10-59 ....... 47 3-10-50 ...... Ir

-2 do............ do....... .... ...... 31 ....... 8 8 do............. .06...... - 1.38 3-16-50 ...... 34 3-16-50 ...... Ir

---------------------- ___---- -- --- -- ------------- --- -- -- ---- ___i -- ---------
TALBN 5, (Continued)

Casui Measuring point Water level Yield Chloride

Above

Year Depth Above Eleva. or Ten.

Well Owner Driller com- of well Aqul- or tion below pers. Use Remarks

number pleted (feet) Depth Diam- for below above (-) Date of Gal. Parts Date ture

(feet) eter Description land mean meas- measur- lons per per sampled ('F)

(inches) surface sea uring ment minute million

(feet) level point

(feet)

618-184-3 Tony Rosbough..... Miller Bros............... 1 ... .... .. 0 8 ............... ............ ... .. ........ 800 56 8-17-50 ...... Ir

618-188-1 do... .......... do....... ... ...... .. 5 ....... 0 .............. . ...... ..... ............... . . 1,000 50 8-17-59 ...... Ir

-2 do... ......... do .. ... ...... 1058 25 ....... 0 8 ................... .......... ......... . .......... 800 37 3-17-50 ...... Ir

617-140-1 Collier Corp......, Carl May .......... 158 141 124 , 2 8 ................. .. ... ....... ................ 2,100 12-21-58 ...... T

617-184-1 Tony Rosbough ... ,, J.M. Whatley ..... ....... 875 ....... 0 F Land surface......... ............ 25.0 0-12-01 250 785 8-16-50 ...... Ir

-2 do.. ......... do......... ... .. .. 60 ....... 8 .................... ...... ........ ... .......... 1,000 61 -17-5Ir

-3 do..... .... do........ ....... 38 .... 0 8 Top of 6inch casing.. 2.38 ....... - 5.03 - 0-50 ....... 71 4-22-59 ...... Ir Equipped with

continuous

waterevel

recorder

617-182-1 do ............ do........... 1058 30 ....... 6 8 do........ ........ ..... ....... ........ 800 43 3-17- ..... I

616-149-1 Mr. Baker....... ......... ver......... 18 50 .... 2 8 . .............. .... ...... ... ............... 30 12-29-59 ...... D

616-148-1 C. B. Lamberteons... do............ 150 38 ....... 2 8 ........................ ...... 48 1- 5-60 ...... D

16-147-1 6-L Farms .......... Miller Bros.... .... 1959 30 ..... 2 2..................... 8 ... . ............... ..................... D

618 -148 -1 John Pulling........ do ......... .. ..... 05 ....... 8 8 ..................... ....... .... ................ ..... ... ... ........ . ..... Ir

S-2 Palm River Estates.. Chis Rivers......... 1960 52 42 2 8 .................... ............. .. .............. ... 290 3- 2-60 ...... Ir

816-145-1 UBGS8.............. Carl May.......... 158 58 ....... 2 8 Top of l.inch casing 3. ....... ....... ................... 275 7-20-58 ...... T , .1 *
616-141-1 USGS .............. CarlMay.......... 1058 51 51 2 S ................................... ................. 87 7-18-58 ...... T Cusing broke at

21 foot

-2 do ............ Miller Bros......... 1059 300 232 2 H Land surface ........ . 0 ....... - .59 8- 4-59 ....... 1,100 8- 3-59 ...... T Chloride sample

taken it 230-

240 feet

016-136-1 do............ do .......... 1950 130 125 2 S do ........... .0 ....... - .39 8-10-50 10 30 8-10-59 ...... T interval

615-149-1 Claude Grimm...... Chiz Rivers......... 10985 60 ....... 2 8 ............. ....... ... . ... .......... ....... 194 12-20-509 ...... D

-2, Mr. Van Camp ...... do .. ...... ....... 40 ....... 2 S .............. . . ....... ....... .......... ....... 458 12-29-59 ...... D

615-148-1 USGS............ USGS....:......... 1059 11 9 134 S Top of 1l-inch casing 1.33 8.74 - 5.56 1- 5-60 ....... 51 11-11-09 ...... 0

- 2.67 8-15-60 ..... .......................

-2 0. L. Foster ....... .,,,.. ............,,...... ....... 2 8 ..................... ....... ....... ........................ 35 12-20-59 ...... D

S8 Ms. Downing ...... Chia Rivers......... 1050 51 42 2 S ..................... ....... ....... ...... ....... 49 12-20-59 ..... D

-4 R. P. Boyd......... do............ 1955 48 ....... 2 8 .................................. ....... ................. 81 12-20-59 ..... D

-5 Myrtle E. Wilkens... do... ....... 1957 35 ....... 2 S ............... ........ .............. .............. 14 12-29-59 ...... D

.-6 M r. Kopen ......... Sweet ..... ....... ....... 56 ....... 2 8 .................... ...... .... .. ....... ......... ....... 17 1- 5-60 ...... D

-7 M. A. Tropf....... ............ ...... 50....... 2 S ................ .............. . .......... . ...... 64 1- 5-60 ...... D

.-8 Earl Craig ......... Chia Rivers......... 1960 3 2 ......... ........ .... ....... ................. 210 1- 5-00 ...... D

S -9 do ........... do ............ 1060 41 ....... 2 8 ..................... ... ... .. . ................ ....... 2 1- 5-60 ...... D

615-147-1 Ralph May......... do ............ 1959 100 ....... 8 8 ..... .... ....... . .. ............. ...... 1,000 314 3-28-60 ...... Ir

-2 do............ Miller Bros ........ 1959 61 ...... 8 S ...... ............... ... ............... 200 3-28-60 Ir

-38 do ............ do ......... 1959 67 ....... 8 8 ............................ . . .......... ....... 30 3-28-60 ..... Ir

-4 do ........... do............ 1959 72 ....... 8 8 ......................... ....................... 19 3-20-60 ..... Ir

-5 6.L Farms........ . . do......... 1959 45 ....... 8 S ............... . ..... ....... ......... .......... ....... 200 3-20-60 ...... Ir

-6 do........... do.......... .......... 1 1d59o 59 ... ..... 8 .... ..................... ....................................... ......... ...... Ir

615-140-1 do ........... do............ 1959 65 ....... 8 S ................ ........... ..... . ....... .... ...... ...... ......... ...... Ir

-2 do .......... do............ 1059 65 ....... 8 ....................... ...................................... Ir

' do............ do ............ 1950 65 ...... 8 S ..................... ..... ... .. . ...... ......... ..... .. 100 3-29-60 ...... Ir

S -4. John Pulling........ do ............ 1959 65 ....... 8 8 ..................... ................................. ........ ............. Ir

-~ -5 do ........... do............ 1959 70 ....... 8 .......................................... .. ................. Ir

S -6 6.L Farms......... do..... ... .. 1 1 59 ....... 0 19 8 . ...................... ....... ........... ......... ... .... ... ... ... ............. Ir

615-120-1 Collier Corp ....... C.E. Failing Co .... 142 1,100 ....... 4% F ................. . . . . ....... ........ . .... .. .......... 82 T Oil Exploratory

614-148-1 USGS.............. USGS.............. 1959 11 9 IM S Top of l•-inch easing .5 15.70 - 6.35 3-20-60 ....... 18 11-11-50 ...... 0

- 1.02 8-15-60

014-147-1 Doyle Hodges...... Carl May ......... 19058 5 ....... 2 S ................. .. . ...... . ..... ...... . 38 11-13-59 ...... D

, 4
TARIa 5, (Continued)

Casing Measuring point Water level Yield Chloride

Above

Year Depth Above Eleva. or Tern.

Well Owner Driller conm- of well Aqul. or tion below pers. Use Remarki number pleted (feet) Depth Diam- fer below above (-) Date of Gal- Parts Date ture (feet) eter Description land mean meaw. measur. lons per per sampled ('F) (inches) surface sea uring ment minute million

(feet) level point

(feet)

614-147-2 USOS............. UBGS.............. 1950 12 0 1% 8 Top of IJ,-luoh casing 0,35 11,5 - 4.32 3-20-60 .. 1... 1 1-11-80 ...... 0

614-14-1 Coller Corp ........ Carl May.......... 1058 115 115 2 8 .. ........... ............ ............. ....... 20 11-18- ...... T Chorida sample

taken at a

614-057-1 John . Harris...... John S. Harri ...... .. .......... 23 23 ........... ...... .. .... .. ......... D depthof 82ft.

614-085-1 do............ do........ ....... . I 11 1 8 ..................... . .... 

614-054-1 do... do......... . do.................. 11 1 . .... .11 . .. .. .. ..

613-148-1 Collier Corp........ Carl May.......... 1000 135 128 2 8 Land surface........ .0 ....... - ,54 8-10-60 ....... 35 8-10-60 ...... T

613-147-1 David Veencehoten .... ....... ...... ....... ................ . .............. ......... ....... 4 11-1-88 .. . D

612-148-1 John Pulling........................ . 1058 78 ...... ...................... ............. .......... 00 18 - 4-0 ..... PS

-2 do........... ................. 1958 75 ....... 6 .................... . ....... ................. 0 44 6- 4-80 .. . PS -3 do............ ... .......... 1958 75 ....... 6 8 . .......... 00 30 - 4-0 ... PS

-4 US8.......... U808.............. 1050 11 0 1 8 Top of l-inch casing 1.7 18.43 - 5.30 3-29-60....... 24 11-11-59 ......

- 2.14 8-15-60

-5 do............ do............ 1059 11 0 1• do.... ........ , 5 10.88 - 5.71 3-29-60 ....... ....... .......... ... . 0

- 1.80 8-15-60

612-147-1 D. H. McBride...... Chia Rivers ..... 155 55 50 2 ...... ... . ....... ..... .............. ...... 28 11-13-58 D

-2 do............ do........... 1055 40 40 2 S ............. .............. 60 11-13-58 D
-3 USGS.............. USGS............. 1980 11 0 1 8 Top of 14.inch casing .55 13.43 - 3.25 1- 5-60 ...... 11-11- ...... 0 tolen

- 4.39 3-20-60

612-146-1 do............ Carl May.......... 1068 123 10 2 8 ........................... . .. .............. 150 7-29-58 ...... T

612-053-1 JohnS. Harris...... do ........ .... . 75 ....... 1 .................. ...... . . ... ... ....... .............. ...... D

612-052-1 do.............. .................... 11 11 1 ....................................... .......................... D

611-148-1 USGS.............. UBGS............. 1959 11 0 13 8 Top of l-inch casing 1.5 15.33 - 6,25 12- 3-59 ....... 835 11-12-59 ...... 0 Stolen

-b.6.9 1-5-60

S -2 do............ do............ 1959 11 9 1% S do............. .75 15.98 - 7.83 8-29-60 ....... 111 11-12-59 ...... 0

- 3.75 8-15-60

611-147-1 P. H. Gadaden, Jr... Bell Well Drilling.... 1058 5 ....... 2 8 ..................... ....... .... ...... .......... ....... 34 6- 4-50 ...... D

-2 Mr. Conrad......... Chic Rivers......... 1952 45 ....... 2 8 ........ .... ...... ....... ..... ... ........ ....... 46 6- 4-59 ...... D

S -3 R. A. Walker ....... R. A. Walker....... ............................ .................... ...... ...... ....... ................. 26 6- 4-59 ...... D

-4 RobertBurgan... Robert Burgan...... ........ .. . ....... . 8 .................................. ... ... .... ....... 88 6- 4-59 ...... D

-5 Hole-in-the-Wall Hartley's Water

Golf Course ..... System......... ....... 60 ....... 2 S .................. ....... .............. ............. ... 54 6- 8-59 ...... PS

S ' - ; do.......... . do............ ...... ....... 2 8 ............... .. ......... ....... ....... ....... ... ....... 24 6- 8-59 ...... PS

, -7 USGS............. USGS............ 1989 11 0 2 S Top of 1-inch casing .75 11.26 - 439 3-2-60 ...... 34 11-12-60 ...... 0 Deetroyed by

S- 1.83 8-15-60 SRD

610-148-1 Collier Corp....... Carl May......... . 1056 54 51 2 Top of 2-inch casing.. .8 ....... - 2.16 8-10-56 75 25 8-16-56 ...... T

-2 do.......... do............. do. .. 1956 00 50 2 8 do.............. . . ...... - 6.51 8-16-6 50 ....... ......... ...... T

.16 145 ....... ...... do............. 1.7 8.55 - 9.87 4-28-61 ...... 40 4-28-61 ...... 0

- 5.47 8-15-60 ...... 68 8-15-60

-3 do............ do............ 1956 58 4 2 8 do............. .8 ....... - 5,70 8-17-56 75 ....................... T

-4 do............ do........... 196 00 50 2 S do............. .4 ...... -12.09 8-27-56 ...... 16 8-27-56 ..... T

-5 USGS... USG......USG.............. 1959 11 9 1 8 Top of 14-inch caing .86 5.44 - 5.03 4-2-61 ....... 60 11-12-50 ..... 0

- 3.04 8-11-61 ...... .. ..............

610-147-1 City of Naples...... Carl May.... ..... 1953 0 85 6 8 .................................................. 500 ....... ............... PS

-2 do............ do............ 1953 87 77 2 8 .......................... ....... ... .. ...... .......... . .......... ...... PS

-3 do.... ....... do............ 10954 .............. 6 8 ................... ... ... ........... ........ ........................ ...... P

-4 do ............ do ............ 1954 50 ...... 6 8 ..................... .. .................. .... .... ...... PS

-5 Caribbean Gardens.. do............ 1094 70-75 ...... 0 S8 .............................. ................. ..... 24 8-11-61 ...... PS

-6 USGS............. do............ 156 74 73 2 S Land surface......... .0 ...... - 4.74 3-14-50 .................. ........ T

-7 Mrs.LawrenceTlbbett ............................ 40 ...... 2 8 Top of 2-inch casing. 3.18 ....... ................ ....... .......... .... Ir

-8 do ............ .. .... .......... . ........ 48 ....... 3 Top of 3-inch casing.. .4 ........ ................. ....... 39 1-19-50 ...... Ir

, .
TAMEx 5. (Conlinued)

ruwing Aluauring Pointr Water level, V'llf d (1,11111rido

Abovey Year Depth I w i Vv.z.

walo l ner DYi&lav s - na well , Lil.t uuI, b1aliw perilu. MIN f lwa

malbIr pfeted (feet) Depth DiNmu . fr 1ahmw ailve D-) olli&t if Qud. P"we Out turd

(free) etti Dee'ipui8un' l a dzl Ih IIumtMnw'M 1 Ir6Wi per per aUmplud (od )

(inches) Burblue usaw Mwi nwua minutib maillbin

(hote), ll ioll Pninh

130-14704 M ,LLaw eeMb rtt.................... .. ...... 42 .. ... o sin& caluun . . ...-... 51)1 ...,,... 1k, -2 d% _ ... ............. .I ..... .. .. ... . ... S.... .. . . . .. . .... .. . .. .. .

-ll L1i~ MFI~aa.: ~ ib~ (;"I1I·~......../: Ij151/ ·U~ r....... ....... Uatfunj ..... ........ Rr31L(W((,... ) Dr O beft)I.....( o -11 Can7b Gat.*11 a u Miay a .,bftn,.. 1Cast of Von ft, auDlow. . 1.7733 4.817, &.58 3ý-z-dfll ........ D"(190) i 3 ...... 31. w el 

CH5 of ...... 6% ... 20 2 .. i5 8......5........6............. I2' 3i20'-6 1..... .

-22 M 4 inwa... e..165 S . Too? of 4W ouiv i1 .- .......

-1 City iofNaple.s. .2.........I $- 914191 . M -19 G. E. dM.r. Car May 4we . 9Lc~oiin., i -W Dil

-20 Ca d e........ &I... 19os ' G,.o. ;.. 5 S ' -17, d oa...,. I.......... , 1951 b 01 K.....( 1 5i 7o f6[ ad Lioaein~l 2. .l,( -8.. l-. OI3( Cbl I'·II.II; 301 V-WI-SOBI II··.·I PS II~tts -21' M. G. PaRnm. CalMa 96 0 K...

1958.. 2I K:::: of 7.w 11.0.. -MJ b

-3 d.......... e18 17 7 2, W 6 as-0s -il pum5iM6

- GS.......... U011)..... 6op 21 T all % ancarom 2,-9 HAM 7 1-3284, 11 S.-2 DLM1iu i...-e.......

-5&.27 5-1111-IS

-25 d o.......1...... .1 t (t ; l% S d ....... 2,5 ) 1.47 I-4.61) 5-2-15 ...,..,..,, U 3-51 . .

3'6718L-D-611 i -26 Chibean Gardens.. Curl Masy........... 1061 ;SO-40, 1 7 TOP OfS 44-21-I

inoni l4-Gae. ...... 7 7 I ................ .............
61o-u46-r City of aples ...... Ca rlM ay.......... 1 98 96 20 9 2 .......... .. ........ ..... .. ........ ..... ..... ...... .. .. ... 7- - .........

*SMS-2I USGS........ --.. SGS.............. 1081 9 S B S TopfonB n afi 2t .. 4.ainau.... 2 -9 ........... ..... ,..... ................. D I iquledle wit

rameordk

60-148-1 Cityof Naples ...... JoeMahanc e....... 1949 74 61 4 S 7Tbpo, ffal•taiu i... 1 ........... - vw *- -1I 25 ;, s-T-S 7T, )

-2 do............. do............ - 1980- 2 88 4 S dC.ilL....... 5 -....... 22 11 S...........T.. S-T SS

-3 LawrnneTi bett... .JeITowunsend ...... 1 0 6O 6 2fl S ...................... ...... ..................... .. .. 5 85 1- e! l

-4 Jui aE lesluman... dm........... I980 55 50 2 S ............... .... II.. ....... - -l.i S

-5 NpIasBeach Cub

Ho......................... ............ S190 Tp, of 6-cincal an ... .9 ..... ... - S l 1 5$-21- ........... 1: 8- -5 80 i

'*-6 d ... ...... .............. . 10..... 1930 SO ....... S8 d ................ -1.. ............ - 1.lI a -8- i1 . 2..... - ....... S 

S -7 do ............ .................... 1930 63 ....... f S ......... ... ..... .... . .... .... ... ......... ..... .....8;- - ..... . .

-' B.W .Mo ft........ C hizRivers ......... 1950 46 ....... 3 S ......... ................. ........................ 5 S- - S r

-9 W.T. Tk sdale..... Aabrey Cooper...... 1951 6 601 2 S ............................................................. 2 928 4 i1 &

-10 do ........... do ........... 195 83 S 2 i....,............... S .............. ... ..... ...... . .. ........ ... 9G -a i-Si r

-11I USGS.............. M aerBres ........ 1952 78 62 2 S TpeT of•' '- i aene,,. .. ........... -7. E-, 1 •- ........... 4 I- ' ......

-12 Dthner............ ............... 1951 40, ....... I %.... S ......... .. .... .... ............ ......- . ........-..... ..... ..... 3l -20 .. ., , -13 UIISGS................ MIter Bro- ........ 195 TI 6Bi i S T3akioS.inb aaicnau .. 2, ..... 42- ......... 5 4-2- SMm Brof....... 1952 71'661nafl gal" ........... 16 2-2S! 6'D

-34 Naphs BBeach CInb - 4.2B -111 D8u ...... 1. ' -11--011;

S H one ............. J.P. ah•rey ...... l a go 82 8 S .................... .. ....... .......... ................ ... .... ..... ............... ...

69-3 -1 CSlrofNapfes ...... dcx........... 1951 83 ....... 4 S TO'p ofr b4achiaai. ..... .. $..1 - ti. ll 31i-ill ...... 28.. 6-7-2 r-S ! l

-2. dc ........... l doL ........... 1951 63 ....... 4 ................ .. .. ........ ................. ... . 8 - T-86 20) Es

- d............. ........... 1951 T3 ... . 4 S Up oflacp, . eaoeina . ........ . I -t - T7.1i •8-6i ... 25 ' 8-7 Sill 7 I5 BES

S -4 do ........... d .1 ........... 9 1 3 ..... 4 S ........... . .. . ..... .. ............ ,................... 3S Tr-3s1 l- ...... S -6 da ........... d o............. 95 II ....... 3 S ............ . ............ ....... . ...... .......... . ........... li ... .. 2 s.. T - -.. - l5<

-S da............ d06........... 1949 T7S 65 4 T opi of 4•bli s hi sinig. I.5 , ...... ... -12t.7 8- V-5• ..... 12 7-7- 179) ' S

-7 do ........... d o............ 1949 75 ....... 4 S do-1 ........... 1... . • . ......... - J.8 - ..... .... .... ............ .. .

-9 a........... do............ 1950 4 5 .. 9 ...... . i 4 - do........... do........... di 1980 8T. 7 4 S aob .......... 5....... .2(31- ..... 5 8- TrlS0 S

-11 9 o.h I .a n ........ ... . do.... ...... .. .... ..... .. .......... .. ............ ... . .... 22 1... 8 ..... - r- . .l ....I

-12 da........... e o............ 19 33 ........ S .... .... . . . .. ... .. . . ... . . . , S. 

-13 C rnverNeroSchool J . P.Mobu rte...... 1980 9B T 4 S I .. ... ............. ... . .... ....... .. , .. ............. ...... . ..... b i O .. .... I... 

-14 W.R. Rom er. ..... , Joha PtE i ....... 1951 63 6 60 i l 8 .. ...... ......... . .... ... . ...... ..... .... . 25 - ,81 D i 

-1S J.G.Samptse ........ . ................... 945 60 ......... i S Btom Epo ie 6i1

elbirw........ . . 7 . ......... - 3.3,9 -a -Si l ..... ...,...,. ... .. ....

-16 do............ JoeM ha rey ........ 1945 52 ......... ; 1 S e... . 1........ U..... , - 3.2S 8- -SI ....... 2 -5 4i - 4.... 

-17 d . ........... .......... ... ... .... 1949 431 ....... 6; S, o... ...... . i ......... - 2.,3 8-5~ 8. ..... 411 8- S 78; i

-1 do .. .......... ......... .................. ... ... Bottomipief ofi 3-inoh

Snipp nelbow. o 2... - -56......... &2 
-d

TAIBL 5, (Continued)

Casing Measuring point Water level Yield Chloride

Above

Year Depth Above Eleva- or TerWell Owner Driller corn ofwell Aqui- or tion below per*. Us Remarku

number pleted (feet) De th Dism- for below above (-) Date of Gal. Puts Date ture

(feet) eter Description land mean meas- mesur- lons per per sampled (F)

(inches) surface sea uring ment minute million

(feet) level point

(feet)

6-147-1 J. G.. ampl ........................... 1949 62 ....... 8 Top of 3.inch nipple

on &.inch caing.... 0.7 ....... - 7.21 8- 7-51 ....... .. ........... ...... Ir

-20 Neapolitan Enterpriase............ ChiRivera......... 1981 63 ....... 3 8 ........................... . ...... .......... ....... 18 8- 8-51 78 PS Supplies 3 homes

Ir and a unrsery -21 R x Lhman...... ......... ........ 1037 72 ....... 2 ............ .. ................... ... .... 18 8- -51 80 D

-22 . .Sampl....... Joe Maharrey....... 1949 52 ....... 6 S Bottomlip of 6-inch

tee............... .3 ...... - 3.31 8-23-51 ....... 43 8-21-51 ...... Ir

-23 CityofNaples...... do............. 1051 68 ....... 4 S Topof 4-inch caing,....... ........ ......... ................. 10 8-16-51 ...... S1

-24 do........... MillerBrce......... 152 78 63 2 8 Top of 2-inch aing.. 2.0 ....... - 4.84 1-10-52 ....... 15 1-10-52 ...... 0

-25 do............ do........... 1952 113 112 2 8 do............ 1.7 ....... -13.91 1-17-52 ....... 448 1-17-52 ...... 0

-26 do........... Bert Dudley........ 13 57 37 6 8 ..................... ....... ...... ..... .. ......... ........ ...... S

609-145-1 Naples Swamp

Buggy Assn......................... 187................................. 17 ............................................... .... ...................... P

60(-143-1 City of Naples...... C.W. May........ 1958 123 104 2 8 ...................... ....... ................. 1.750 7-17-8 ...... T

60-141-1 do............ do............ 1958 144 80 4 5 ............... ..... ....... ...... ......... ..... 88 8-14-58 ...... T

609-120-1 USG.............. Miller Bros......... 1059 122 82 2 8 ................... .... ..... .................... 15 8-20-59 ..... T

609-115-1 do............ do.......... 1950 485 312 4 F Lnd surface......... ...... 15 16 5-21-61 5 985 -23-50 ...... T Single well con700 587 2% F do............. ....... 15 38 5-21-61 12 1,950 10-8-59 ............ structed to

perform as two

wells of different depths
608-148-f LA.Orick......... Chis iers.......... 1949 52 ....... a 8 .................... ......... .. ........ . ......... 31 1. 8- -1 S Ir

-2 Ad Miner.......... Aubrey Cooper...... 1950 60 ....... 2 8 ............................ ....... ....... .......... ....... 408 9-26-51 80 Ir

-3 J.E. Turner........ Jeff Townsend...... 1950 42 ....... 2 8 ............................ ....... ....... ............... 21 9-26-51 79 Ir

-4 C.J.Summerall.... C.J.Summerall..... 1949 42 ....... 1 8 ................................. ....... ................. 15 9-26-1 ...... Ir

-6 L O. Clark......... Aubrey Cooper...... 1950 42 ....... 2 8 ...................................... .......... ....... 14 9-26-51 82 Ir

-6 RoyBrack......... do............ 1950 42 ...... 2 .................... ......... ...... ................. 113 9-26-1 80 Ir

-7 William Storter..... Jeff Townsend...... 1949 45 ....... 8 .. ................... ............................. 442 9-26-1 79 Ir

-8 .M. McClaskey... Aubrey Cooper...... 1951 40 ....... 1% 8 ................... ....... ..... ...... ................. 242 4-29-2 ...... Ir

-9 H.C.Sherier....... do... ......... 1951 42 ....... 1 S 8 ..................... ... ... ....... ................... 17 4-29-M ...... Ir

. -10 L.. Grimes........ do............ 1951 46 ....... 1 8 .................... ....... .. ............. 118 4-29-52 ...... Ir

-11 R.L. Williams...... J.P. Mahrrey...... 1951 ....... ....... 2 8 ........................... ............................ 21 .......... ...... Ir

608-147-1 C.L.Yonze... .... .................... 140 110 ....... 3 8 ................... .......... ................... ....... 22 7-31-46 78 PS

-2 City of Naples...... Joe Maharrey............. 73 66 3 8 Top of 3-inch casing.. 1.81 .............. ............... 43 7-31-46 ...... PS

-3 do........ ................... 7 6 4 S .................... ................... . . 43 8- 7-51 79 P8

-4 do............ do ............ ... ..................... 4 8 .. ...... .. .. ...... ....... ................. ....... 25 8- 7-51 79 PS

' , -5 -5 do do........... ........... do.......... do............ ....... .. 73 73 ....... ....... 4 4 8 8 ................... ................ .... ....... ....... ....... ...... ................. ...... ......... ....... ....... 41 41 8- 8- 7-51 7-14 78.5 78.5 PSPS

-6 do............ do................. 3 ....... 4 8 ................................ ................. 25 8-31-46 78 PS

-7 JackPrince......... .................... 1930 27 ...... 1 8 .................. .................... .......... ....... 19 8-8-1 79 D

-8 Naples Supply Co... Joe Maharrey....... 1950 70 ....... 3 8 ................................ ....... ................. 45 8- 8-51 8 In

-0 John Polling.............. ....... 1939 33 ....... 2 8 ...................... .............................. 32 8- 8-51 80 8

-10 Trail End Motel.... .................. 1981 75 70 4 8 ................... ........... .. ........................ 89 8- 8-51 79 Ir

-11 CityIceandFuelCo.................... 1930 73 70 3 .................. ..... ...... ... . ....... ...... ..... ................ In

-12 Comb Fish Co...... ........................................ 1% 8 ........... ................. ..... ................ 270 8- 9-51 79 In

-13 City ce and FuelCo................... 1940 73 ....... 3 8 ............ ....... .................... 167 8- 9-81 78 In

-14 do............ .................... 1922 .............. 4 8 Top of 4-inch casing .0 ....... - 3.78 8- 9-51 ....... 200 8-9-51 ...... In

-15 City of Naples...... Joe Maharrey....... 1941 66 60 3 8 ..................... ....... ......... ... ............ ................ 0

S -16 do............ do........... 1951 72 60 4 8 ..................... .............. . ...... 16 10-11-51 ...... PS

S '-17 do............ do. .......... 1951 81 78 4 8 ................... ............... ...... ....... 31 10-12-51 ...... PS

-18 do............ do........... 1951 40 27 6 8 .................. ........... ....... ...... .......... ...... 15 10-12-51 ...... PS

S' -19 do. .......... do.......... 1951 76 74 4 8 ................. ......... ..... . ........... 12 8-16-51 ...... PS

S -20 Bea Shell Motel..... Chi Rivers................ 78 68 4 8 ........................ ...... ...... ................ 27 10-17-51 ...... D

-21 City of Naples...... Joe Maharrey....... 1939 540 300 5 F Top of -inch coupling 1.0 ....... 21.5 1-18-2 ....... 2,180 12-17-1 ...... In Fire well

-22 do............ M.........Mi Br......... 1952 70 69 2 8 Top of 2-inch cnsing.. 1.6 ....... - 4.28 1-14-52 ....... 27 1-14-52 ......

-23 A. Dimeola......... Chiz River......... 1049 55 ....... 1 8 ..................... ... . . ..... ........ ........ ....... 145 3-11-52 ..... D

-24 City of Naples...... B.Dudley......... 1953 33 27 6 8 ..................... ...... ....... ......................... ............... PS

-25 do........... do.. ........ 1952 22 19 4 8 .................... ...... . ........ ..... .. ....... ......... ..... PS

-26 do............ do............ 1952 69 82 4 8 ....................... ............. ......... . ...... 4 6-25-3 ...... PS

-27 Clam Canning Plant. ................. . . 63 .. 6 .................... ....... ............. ....... .................... 78 In

-28 J.L. Kirk.......... ubrey Cooper...... 191 42 ...... 2 8 ... ........ ............ 168 8- 9-51 77 Ir

: aI
TA~ra 5, (Continued)

('uiu Measuring point Water level Yield Chloride

Above

Year Depth Above Eleva. or Temn

Well Owner Driller com- of well Aqui. or tlon below pers- Use Remarks

number pleted (feet) Depth Diam. fer below above (-) Date of aal. Parts Date ture

(feet) eter Description land mean mesa. measur- lons er per sampled (OF)

(inches) surface ea uriog ment minute million

(feet) level point

(feet)

608-4 - C.A. Newell.... .. ............... .. ... 19 3 63 60 2 8 ............................ .... ........................ . . .. .......... ...... D

-2 do ................................. 193 3 72 .................. ....... . .... .................... ................ D

-3 John Townsend..... Chis Rivers......... .... ..... .... .... 8 ................... .................... .... 7 1-16- ..... D

-4 C. M. Townsend .... do............ . 00..... 2 8 ........................................... 30 79 1-16-59 ...... D

-5 Rev. Walton......... .............. ..... 70 63 2 S .................... .. ....... ....... 70 87 1-16- ...... D

-6 Aubrey Cooper.;;..: Aubrey Cooper..... ....... 72 72 1 l 8 ..................... ...... . .......... . 127 1-16-59 ..... D

-7 do............ do................. 84 54 2 8 ........................ .. . ........... . ....... 54 1-16- .... D

007-148-1 J. . Sample........ J.P. Maharrey...... 1952 325 300 6 F Top of discharge pipe 0.0 4.0 18.0 5-21-61 1,000 2,040 2-11-52 ...... Ir Flowing well

607-147-1 V. L.Belding........................ 1951 245 235 4 8 .................. .... . ....................... 4,400 11-13-51 ...... Ir

607-146-1 Tom Hamilton...... CarlMay.......... ....... 102 95 2 8 .................. ...... . ....................... 80 1-16-9 ...... D

-2 Glades Motel....... do............ ..... 120 105 2 8 ........................... ............................ 11 1-16-59 ...... PS

-3 Roland Weeks...... Chi Rivers...... 1958 18 18 2 8 ..................... ....... .... ....... ................ 266 116-5 ...... D

, -4 Thomas Weeks...... CarlMay......... 195 43 43 2 8 ............. ...... .... ..................... 29 1-16-59 ...... D

-5 Hampton........... do........... 1955 43 43 2 8 ................. .......... ............... .. ... ....... ................ D

' -6 DickTownsend..... do...... ...... . .. 70 0 ....... 2 8 ............................ ... . . . ...... ... . .. .. ....... ...... D

607-14-1 Collier Development

Corp............ do.......... 1958 141 120 2 8 ............... ... ..... ........ ...... 270 11-17-58 ...... T

606-148-1 W.B.Uihlein....... Richard. ......... 1937 470 ....... 6 F ................... ....... ... ................. 1,90 8- 0-51 78 Ir

606-148-1 USG8............ MillerBra......... 195 142 105 2 ........................ ... ...... ......... ................... 80 T
606-120-1- Collier Development

Corp............. ................ ....... 45 ...... 4 8 ............................ ..... .............. 6-16-1 ...... 0 Equippedwith

recorder

605-148-1 A.Nystrom......... Miller Brc......... 1049 220 213 4 ........................... .... .. .......... ....... 240 1-20-52 ...... Ir

605-144-1 John Seekford.......................... 1958 33 ....... 2 S ................... ........ ................. ...... 130 1- 2-59 ...... D

-2 Albert Anderson.... Chis Rivers......... 1 83 30 2 .............................. ................. 172 1- 2-59 ...... D

605-143-1 Jack Cannon........ do.......... 1.......... ... 2 8 ............... ... . .... ...... . .. .......... ...... 92 1- 2-59 ...... D

-2 George Nemchik.... do........... 1957 82 32 2 8 ...................... ................ ...... ...... 130 1- 2-59 ...... D

-3 TravisBickford do..... do2 .... 197 ............ 82 ..... ...... ...................... ....... 174 1- 2-59 ...... D

-4 1.0. Edwards ...... C.W.May......... 1958 42 38 2 8 ..................... 1.. ...... ....... ... ....... 134 1- 2-59 ...... D

04-144-1 Charles McCool..... H. .Snowball..... 1958 30 30 2 8 .................... . ................. ....... 80 1- 2-59 ...... D Not used for

drikinag

604-148-1 William French..... do........... 1958 25 2 2 8 .................... ........................... ...... 08 12-31-58 ...... D

-2 J.G.Breau......... C. W. May......... 1954 32 32 2 S ..................... .......... ......... ....... 82 12-31-58 ...... D, Ir

-3 do......... .... do............ 1953 32 32 2 S .................. ... .... . ....... .......... ....... . ....... ............... D, Ir

-4 do............ do............ 1954 22 22 4 8 . .................. .............. .... .......... ...... ....... ............... Ir

-5 do.......... . do............ 1954 27 22 4 8 ............. . .... ... .............. .......... ....... 78 12-31-58 ...... Ir

-6 J.H. aunt........ do................. 2 20 * 20 6 8 ................... . . . .... ...................... ..................... Ir

-7 do ............ do................... 30 30 6 S .............. .. .. . ............ ...... ....... 88 12-31-58 ...... Ir

-8 Claude Hunter...... H. R. Snowball..... 1958 84 34 2 8S .................. .. . .. ................... ....... 56 1- 2-59 ...... D

S603-141-1 L.L. Loach......... C. W. May........ 1958 31 34 2 8 Top of 2-inch casing.. .43....... - 2.45 2-12-59 ....... 220 2-12-59 ...... 0

-2 do............ do........... 1958 34 34 2 8 do............. .2 ....... - 2.33 2-12-59 ...... 314 2-12-59 ...... 0

S -3 do............ do. .......... 1958 30 34 2 S do ....... .............. - 2.4 2-12-59 ....... 238 2-12-59 ..... 0

-4 do............ do........... 1958 30 34 2 8 do........... 1.0 ...... - 2.61 2-12-59 ....... 204 2-12-59 ..... 0

S -5 do............ do............ 1958 28 34 4 S Top of 4-inch casing. .97 ...... - 2.87 2-12-59 ....... 156 2-12-59 ...... 0

602-142-1, Barefoot Williams... Chi Rivers......... 1954 16 11 2 8 Top of 2-inch tee..... 1.5 ...... - 2.72 12-30-58 ....... 760 2-12-59 ...... D

S -2 Carl Puhhbas........ .... ..... ............... ..................... F .................... . ............................. . ........... ...... ..... Flowing well

-3 J.G.Breau......... H.R.Snowball........... 27 27 2 8 ................. ..... .......... ......... ..... ....... 424 12-30-58 ...... Ir

602-141-1 L. Loach......... C. W. May......... 1958 42 38 2 8 ..................... ...... ................ Salty from 28

feet downward

559-120-1 USGS............ Miller Broe......... 1959 127 126 2 8 Top of 2-inch casing.. .7 ...... - 1.35 8-17-59 ....... 31 8-14-59 ...... T

558-143-1 G.L. Lowenstein.... Kellog.................... 800- ....... F Top of 2-inch vertical

900 tee.............. 2.0 10- 14.5 10-28-40 ....... ................ 70 D *Exactdepth of

well unknown

cc
TABI.B 5, (Continued)

Cuing Meauring point Water level Yield Chloride

Above

Year Depth Above Eleva. or Tern.

Well Owner Driller com. of well Aqul- or tion below pera. Use Remarks number pleted (feet) Depth Diam. for below above (-) Date of Gal. Parts Date ture

(feet) eter Description land mean meas. measur- lone per per sampled ('F) (Inches) surface sea uring ment minute million

(feet) level point

(feet)

668-148-2 MarooHighland,Iuc,. Carl May .......... 1057 53 48 2 ..... ..... ... .......... 17,200 0- 5-7 .... T Chloride less

than 40 ppm

to depth of 20

feet

557-120-1 Collier Corp........ Humble Oil Co..... 1052 300 7 ................... . . .... ............... . ....... ......... ...... T Log in Collier

County engi

necr's filo 850-148-1 ................. .......... .. .. ... ....... ... ....... . . .. ................... 78 ...... ' -2 Barron Collier...... .......... ....... ....... 12 ....... 2 8 Surface.................. ...... - 0.0 10-28-40 .............. ..... 76 D

-3 Richard Brooks...... ................. ...... .... ....... . .. ................. . . .......... ................ 35 5-11-50 ..... D

550-142-1 J.M. Barfield ..... Miller Broe........ 1020 200-300 ....... 4 F? ............... ...... .... ... 2,550 10-28-40 78. ..... Flowing -2 Maroo sland8chool. ................. ....... 22 .. ............... . ...... ........... ........ 75 5-11-50 ...... D *200/day

,66-128-1 L. G.Ncrris....... J. M. Whatley...... 109 302 300 4 F Top of 4-inch casing,. 0,5 3 33.5 4-10-50 100 330 4- 8-0 78 D Flowing

650-121-1 Lee Tidewater

Cypress Co....... Humble Oil Co...... ...... 440 ............ F Top of 0-inch casing.. 1.5 ....... 32,0 7-25-40 Flow 2,810 7-25-46 75 A

-2 do.......... .. ............... 145 80 15 ........ ..... . . ...... . ...... ...... .... 0 27 7-25-46 77 D

655-142-1 Collier Development

Corp............. .................... ....... 13 ....... 2 S Top of curbing...... 1.2 ....... -11.4 10-28-40 ....... .. . .. .......... 78 In

-2 J. M. Bareld......................... .... 22 ....... 1 8 .............. ........ .............. 59 10-28-40 ..... D , -8 Naples Construction

Co............... .................... 199 20 ....... .............. ....... ....... ..... ........... 23 -11-9 .... In
d55-i =t-l .GCoilier DevelUeije

ul ,

SCorp............. Libby and Freeman. ... , . ....... ....... ........ ................... .. ... .... ............... 1,700 12-21-49 ............ Well never coriplated

-2 do........... Humble Oil Co....... 1940 540 361 7 F Top of 3-inch elbow... 2.0 11is 19.2 12-21-49 ....... 4,000 12-21-49 80 Ir

-3 Ken Fogetad........ ...... ... . 14 13.... ...... 2 8.............. ................... ..... .......... ....... 80 12-21-40 ...... D Two wellsin

manifold 20

-4 Collier Development Top of 0-inch valve feet apart

Corp............. Libby and Freeman......... 351 345 0 F flange............. 3. 6.- 21.3 6-20-50 ....... ,800 6-20-50 79 ...... Flowing

-5 H. F. Pcttit........ Paul Lawrence..... ....... 342 320 3 F Top of 1lJ-inch valve 4.5 4+ 17.5 0-20-80 ....... 2,250 6-20-50 78.2 ...... do.

54-143-1 U.S. Air Force...... J M. Whatley and

Miller Bros....... 1059 404 851 8 F Top of 8-inch casing.. .0 0.0 18.0 4-27-59 600 2,700 4-27-59 ...... In Flowing

854-142-1 Mr. Kice........... Miller................... .................. .... .. . . . .. ........ .. ............. 2,080 10-28-40 ............ Abandonedflowing

-2 Al Groseman........ do ..... ...... ....... 376 ....... 4 F ..................... ... ......... ............. ...... . 2,590 1-19-47 77.5 ...... Flowing

S -3 City of Caxambae ......................... , 7 ........ .... ... 12x12 foot curbing.... .0 20: - 4.7 10-28-40 ....... 70 10-28-40 77 PS

S654-140-1 G. B. Patrick.......... .................. 139 1 ....... 3/4 8 ................... ...... ...... .......... ....... 3. 7 10-28-40 80 D

-2 do........... ...... ............ . 137 12 ..... . 1 5 .................. . . . ....... ... ........ ... . .............. ....... 81 D

5 4-122-1 Collier Development

Corp...... . ........ ........... .. ..... ..... ..... F Land surface........ .0 4 34.5 5-20-01 .... 388 -19-0 ...... PS Flowing

854-118-1 Ralph Brown...... . O.L. Norman...... . 1939 450 ..... . 6 F ................. ........... .... .. . ...... .. . ...... ....... ....... ............ Flowing'

'-2 .do............ FrankNoyes....... 1930 450 ....... . F ................. ........... . . . .. .... ..... .. . ......... ... .. In do.

-3 K. G. Hoy......... Anderson......... 103 440 ...... 3 F Center of gage....... 3,5 5.0 34,0 10-29-40 ....... 1,460 10-29-40 72 D do.'

-118-1 . A. Griffin........ E. A, Griffin........ 145 14 ....... 2 8 Top of well.......... 1.3 ....... - 1.0 6- 4-46 ...... 4,800 11- 2-1 ...... D, In

551-123-1 Lee County Light & Maharrey and

Power Co........ Norman,.......... 1938 28 370 0 F .................. .... ............. ................. 1,650 9-13-48 ..... In

-2 City of Everglades,, Miller.............. 1027 463 377 F ................ ...... .... ... . . ... ..... ..... . 10 -19-60 ...... PS

-3 do............ Maharrey and

Norman......... 1986 478 407 6 F .................. . .................. ... ......... 360 -19-60 ...... PS

-4 do............ ..................... ....... 03 375 8 F ............... ...... .......... ...... ................. 121 10-28-59 ...... PS

-5 do ........ ................ . .... .. .... ....... 400 ...... 8 F ................................. ...... . ........ ........ 1,440 193 .... .

-6 do.......... MillerBrcs,... .... 1957 612 304 8 F Top of casing.,..... 2,4 ..... ' 18.4 10- -69 200 885 10- -69 78 In

880-123-1 City of Everglades,, Maharroy and

Norman.......... 1935 803 37 6 F Surface.............. .0 4.0 26.0 0- -61 ...... 240 10-26-90 ...... PS

00

I-
TAB.i 5. (Continued)

Cluing Meuuring point Water level Yield Chloride

Abcve

Year Depth Above Eleva. ar Term

Well Owner Driller orm. of well Aqui- or tion below pert. VU Remarks

number pleted (rfeet) Depth Diam- fer below above (-) Date of Gal- Parts Date ture

(feet) eter Description land mean mesa- meuaur. lon per per sampled (' )

(inches) surface sea uring ment minute million

(feet) level point

S (feet)

LA.W.G Log on'

i. lin Coelir

County engiSnesrig o"iee '8 -121-1 0. Hamilton....... Libby and Freeman.. 1049 484 436 5 F Top of incb eaing.. 1.5 ....... 81.5 8-16-49 400 1,250 8-16-49 ...... D

-2 Ted BmaUwood..... .................... ....... 456 417 8 F ..................... ...... ....................... 700 8-18-4 ...... D

3 do............ Libby and Freeman.. 149 47 ....... 4 F ..................... ....... ....... ....................... 950 9-19-4 ...... D

-4 Collier County..... ................... .. ..... 430 ....... 6 F ..................... ........................ ... 400 2-20-7 ...... ......

Y,'• '

, ,:.

,•,,,~~~~· ,•/ . ',,,.,•'