alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 3102

To amend the Truth in Lending Act, Truth in Savings Act, and Consumer

Leasing Act to modify certain disclosure requirements.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

SEPTEMBER 21, 1993

Mr. LAROCCO (for himself and Mr. CASTLE) introduced the following bill;

which was referred to the Committee on Banking, Finance and Urban Affairs

A BILL

To amend the Truth in Lending Act, Truth in Savings

Act, and Consumer Leasing Act to modify certain disclosure requirements.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. CONSUMER CREDIT DISCLOSURES.

4 The Truth in Lending Act of 1968 (15 U.S.C. section

5 1601 et seq.) is amended by inserting the following new

6 section 1639:

7 ‘‘CONSUMER CREDIT DISCLOSURES IN RADIO

8 ADVERTISING

9 ‘‘SEC. 1639. For advertisements, announcements, or

10 solicitations made through any radio broadcast, the disclo-
2

HR 3102 IH

1 sures required by section 1637 and section 1638 of this

2 title may be made by providing consumers with access to

3 the disclosure information through toll-free telephone

4 numbers or by other means which provide consumers with

5 the disclosure information prior to the extension of cred6 it.’’.

7 SEC. 2. CONSUMER SAVINGS DISCLOSURES.

8 Section 4303(b) of The Truth in Savings Act of 1991

9 (12 U.S.C. section 4301 et seq.) is amended:

10 (1) by redesignating section 4302(b) as section

11 4302(b)(2); and

12 (2) by inserting immediately before it the fol13 lowing new subsection:

14 ‘‘(b)(1) For advertisements, announcements, or so15 licitations made through any radio broadcast, the disclo16 sures required by this section may be made by providing

17 consumers with access to the disclosure information

18 through toll-free telephone numbers or by other means

19 which provide consumers with the disclosure information

20 prior to the opening of an account.’’.

21 SEC. 3. CONSUMER LEASE DISCLOSURES.

22 Section 1667c of the Consumer Leasing Act of 1976

23 (15 U.S.C. section 1601 et seq.) is amended—

24 (1) by redesignating section 1667c(b) as section

25 1667c(c); and
3

HR 3102 IH

1 (2) by inserting immediately before it the fol2 lowing new subsection:

3 ‘‘(b) For advertisements, announcements, or solicita4 tions made through any radio broadcast, the disclosures

5 required by this section may be made by providing con6 sumers with access to the disclosure information through

7 toll-free telephone numbers or by other means which pro8 vide consumers with the disclosure information prior to

9 a lease.’’.

Æ
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

November 29, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 130574 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman, JOANN KUSMIERZ, KERRY KUSMIERZ, Justices
 

KIM L. LINDEBAUM, JAMES B. 

LINDEBAUM, and M SUPPLY CO., 

Plaintiffs-Appellees, 

v SC: 130574 

 COA: 258021 
 Bay CC: 01-003467-CZ

JOYCE SCHMITT and DIANE RANKIN,

Defendants-Appellants, 

and 

RONALD SCHMITT,

Defendant.
 

_________________________________________/ 

On November 14, 2006, the Court heard oral argument on the application for leave 

to appeal the November 15, 2005 judgment of the Court of Appeals. On order of the 

Court, the application is again considered. MCR 7.302(G)(1). In lieu of granting leave 

to appeal, we REVERSE that part of the Court of Appeals judgment assessing case 

evaluation sanctions, and REMAND this case to the Bay Circuit Court for further 

proceedings not inconsistent with this order. Because the parties stipulated to a lump 

sum case evaluation award, there was no “amount of the evaluation . . . as to . . . 

particular pair[s] of parties” for purposes of MCR 2.403(O)(4)(1). Without such an 

amount, the court cannot compare the verdict to the case evaluation award for each pair 

of parties as required by the court rules, and the court cannot determine whether either 

party received a more favorable verdict. Therefore, neither party is entitled to case 

evaluation sanctions. Plaintiffs are directed to reimburse defendants for the case 

evaluation sanctions that have already been paid. 

We do not retain jurisdiction. 

d1121 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

November 29, 2006 

 Clerk
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3039 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3039

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to repeal the excise tax on 
                       luxury passenger vehicles.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 9, 1993

 Mr. Hoagland introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to repeal the excise tax on 
                       luxury passenger vehicles.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REPEAL OF LUXURY TAX ON PASSENGER VEHICLES.

    (a) In General.--Chapter 31 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 
(relating to retail excise taxes) is amended by striking subchapter A.
    (b) Conforming Amendments.--
            (1) Subsection (c) of section 4221 of such Code is amended 
        by striking ``4001(c), 4001(d), or''.
            (2) Subsection (d) of section 4222 of such Code is amended 
        by striking ``4001(c), 4001(d),''.
            (3) The table of subchapters for chapter 31 of such Code is 
        amended by striking the item relating to subchapter A.
    (c) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall take 
effect on January 1, 1993.

                                 <all>
```
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 12.0

                             COOPER INDUSTRIES, INC.
               COMPUTATION OF RATIOS OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
                          (Dollar Amounts in Thousands)
                                  (Unaudited)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                   Year Ended December 31,
                                             -----------------------------------------------------------------
                                                2001           2000           1999          1998          1997
                                             ----------    ----------    ----------    ----------   ----------
<S>                                          <C>           <C>           <C>           <C>          <C>

Interest Expense                             $   84,700    $  100,300    $   55,200    $  101,900   $   90,400

Capitalized Interest                              1,462         3,946            --            --           --

Estimated Interest Portion of Rent Expense       13,369        15,614        13,948        12,352       10,864
                                             ----------    ----------    ----------    ----------   ----------

Fixed Charges                                $   99,531    $  119,860    $   69,148    $  114,252   $  101,264
                                             ==========    ==========    ==========    ==========   ==========

Income from Continuing Operations
    Before Income Taxes                      $  316,400    $  549,900    $  518,600    $  523,600   $  483,200

Add: Fixed Charges                               98,069       115,914        69,148       114,252      101,264

Less: Equity in (Earnings) / Losses of
      50% or Less Owned Companies                (2,922)       (3,367)       (1,069)          595         (320)
                                             ----------    ----------    ----------    ----------   ----------

Earnings Before Fixed Charges                $  411,547    $  662,447    $  586,679    $  638,447   $  584,144
                                             ==========    ==========    ==========    ==========   ==========

Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges                 4.1x          5.5x          8.5x          5.6x         5.8x
</TABLE>
<PAGE>

                                                                   Exhibit 23(a)




                    CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the incorporation of
our report dated June 16, 2000 (except for certain matters discussed in Note
6 to the consolidated financial statements, as to which the date is August
15, 2000) included in this Form 10-K, into the Company's previously filed
Registration Statement Nos. 33-62967, 33-62971, 33-72928, 333-32394,
333-68059 and 333-37913.

                                                         /s/ ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP

Minneapolis, Minnesota,
   August 15, 2000


                                       44
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

JUDGMENT

No. 04

- 13

- 00685

- CR

Derwin Jamaal STRAUGHTER

, Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the County Court at Law No. 1, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 360666

The Honorable John D. Fleming, Judge Presiding

BEFORE JUSTICE ANGELINI

, JUSTICE ALVAREZ , AND JUSTICE CHAPA

In accordance with this c ourt’s opinion of this date, the judgment of the trial court is

MODIFIED as follows:

It is ORDERED that any assessment of attorney’s fees against Derwin Jamaal

Straughter be deleted from the judgment.

As modified, the judgment of the trial court is AFFIRMED.

SIGNED June 4, 2014.

_____________________________ Karen Angelini, Justice
(January 24, 2002)

#### Patricia A. Hutchinson, Respondent, v Zurich Scudder Investments, Inc., Formerly Known as Scudder Kemper Investments, Inc., Appellant, et al., Defendants.

[737 NYS2d 25]

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Jane Solomon, J.), entered on or about May 18, 2001, which, in this action for breach of employment contract, defamation and declaratory relief, insofar as appealed from, denied defendant Zurich Scudder Investments, Inc.’s (hereinafter Scudder) motion to dismiss the second and third causes of action, unanimously reversed, on the law, with costs, the motion granted, and the causes of action for breach of employment contract and declaratory relief dismissed.

The IAS court erred in denying Scudder’s motion to dismiss the breach of contract claim. Plaintiff makes no claim that she was promised employment for a fixed duration and, thus, her employment is presumed to be a hiring at will, terminable at any time by either party *(see, Ferring v Merrill Lynch & Co.,*244 AD2d 204, quoting *Matter of De Petris v Union Settlement Assn.,*86 NY2d 406; *Sabetay v Sterling Drug,*69 NY2d 329, 336). Nor has she successfully refuted the presumption of at-will employment by her claim that Scudder’s obligation to pay her the promised compensation became fixed when she rejected the prospective employer’s offer and accepted Scudder’s. Turning down other offers of employment is insufficient to rebut the presumption, absent a showing that plaintiff was induced to do so in reliance on a written policy statement providing assurance of continued employment *(see, Arrington v Liz Claiborne, Inc.,*260 AD2d 267). Concur — Williams, J.P., Andrias, Saxe, Wallach and Lerner, JJ.
# C_2013343EN.01001501.xml

| 23.11.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 343/15 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.11.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 343/15

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.6922 — Triton/Logstor)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2013/C 343/02

On 23 August 2013, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32013M6922. EUR-Lex is the online access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32013M6922. EUR-Lex is the online access to the European law.

---
-84 -82 -80 -78 -76 -74 -72

 34

 36

 38

 40

★

▲

▲

▲

▲

★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲

 500

 1000

 1500

 100

18 12 06 00

09/26

NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL

 Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 26 Sep 07

 EDAS Meteorological Data

Source

★ at 38.81 N 76.74 W Meters AGL

★

■

■

■

■

★ ■ ■ ■

■

★

●

● ●

●

★

●

● ●

●
EXHIBIT 31.2




CERTIFICATION






I, Marc Sherman, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, certify that:






1.
I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010 of QSGI INC. (the “Registrant”);






2.
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;






3.
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;






4.
The Registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Registrant and have:






(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;






(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and






(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the Registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the Registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the Registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and






5.
The Registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the Registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):






(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and






(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Registrant's internal control over financial reporting.




Date: February 15, 2012

/s/ Marc ShermanMarc Sherman

Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
**EXHIBIT 31.1**
**CERTIFICATIONS**
I, Terry L. Collins, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Argon ST, Inc.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary tomake the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which suchstatements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered bythis annual report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this annual report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations, and cash flows ofthe registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annualreport; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrantand have:
 a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or causedsuch disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made knownto us by others within those entities, particularly during theperiod in which this report is being prepared;  b. Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosurecontrols and procedures and presented in this report our conclusionsabout the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, asof the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and  c. Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter that has materially affected, oris reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting; and
5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based onour most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting,to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’sboard of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
 a. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in thedesign or operation of internal control over financial reportingwhich are reasonable likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and  b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management orother employees who have a significant role in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting.
Date: December 14, 2004
/s/ Terry L. Collins
#### A. A. HOLIDAY RENT-A-CAR, INC., a Florida corporation, Appellant, v. MIDWEST MUTUAL INSURANCE CO., an Iowa corporation, Appellee.

No. 67-565.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Third District.

Nov. 7, 1967.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
# etab11
# C_2013051EN.01000401.xml

| 22.2.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 51/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.2.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 51/4

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

21 February 2013

2013/C 51/04

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,3186 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 122,85 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4596 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,86420 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 8,4615 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,2290 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 7,4755 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 25,496 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 292,47 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,6997 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,1735 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,3795 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,3656 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,2859 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,3437 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 10,2267 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,5796 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,6344 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 435,48 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 11,7640 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 8,2274 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,5905 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 12 807,01 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,0975 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 53,829 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 40,0680 |
| THB | Thai baht | 39,373 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 2,5935 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 16,8313 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 72,0020 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,3186

JPY

Japanese yen

122,85

DKK

Danish krone

7,4596

GBP

Pound sterling

0,86420

SEK

Swedish krona

8,4615

CHF

Swiss franc

1,2290

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

7,4755

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

25,496

HUF

Hungarian forint

292,47

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,6997

PLN

Polish zloty

4,1735

RON

Romanian leu

4,3795

TRY

Turkish lira

2,3656

AUD

Australian dollar

1,2859

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,3437

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

10,2267

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,5796

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,6344

KRW

South Korean won

1 435,48

ZAR

South African rand

11,7640

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

8,2274

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,5905

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

12 807,01

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,0975

PHP

Philippine peso

53,829

RUB

Russian rouble

40,0680

THB

Thai baht

39,373

BRL

Brazilian real

2,5935

MXN

Mexican peso

16,8313

INR

Indian rupee

72,0020

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---