alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 00-20818 Conference Calendar

ALCARIO BARRIOS, JR., Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus JOHNNY’S SPORT SHOP; MICHAEL L. GRIGAR; JEFF ARGO; R. H. (CURLY) WIED, Defendants-Appellees.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. H-99-CV-2730

-------------------- June 14, 2001 Before WIENER, DeMOSS, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Alcario Barrios, Texas prisoner # 834396, appeals the district court’s dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 suit under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(1) for failure to state a claim. Barrios had alleged that an employee of Johnny’s Sport Shop sold Barrios a shotgun knowing that Barrios was on felony probation and that theemployee entrapped Barrios into a felon-in-possession-of-afirearm offense. On appeal, Barrios argues that the shop’s employee conspired with a state actor to entrap Barrios and couldNo. 00-20818 -2- thus be held liable under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, that the district court erred when it dismissed Barrios’s complaint prematurely without allowing him to amend his complaint or file additional pleadings, and, liberally construed, that he cannot have his felon-in-possession conviction invalidated because the charge is still pending. We review the district court’s dismissal de novo . See Ruiz v. United States , 160 F.3d 273, 275 (5th Cir. 1998). A dismissal of a complaint for failure to state a claim is proper when, taking the plaintiff’s allegations as true, it appears that no relief could be granted on the plaintiff’s alleged facts. See Bass v. Parkwood Hosp. , 180 F.3d 234, 240 (5th Cir. 1999). The district court correctly determined that Barrios could not seek 42 U.S.C. § 1983 relief for an allegedly illegal search and detention on the felon-in-possession charge until that charge had been invalidated. See Heck v. Humphrey , 512 U.S. 477, 486-87 (1994); see also Randell v. Johnson , 227 F.3d 300,300-01 (5th Cir. 2000), petition for cert. filed , (U.S. Dec. 26, 2000)(No. 00-1054). The district court’s dismissal of Barrios’s complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A was not premature and was not error.
AFFIRMED.
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 3194

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide for inflation adjustments to the income threshold amounts at which 85 percent of social

security benefits become includable in gross income.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

SEPTEMBER 30, 1993

Mr. FILNER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Ways and Means

A BILL

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide

for inflation adjustments to the income threshold

amounts at which 85 percent of social security benefits

become includable in gross income.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Equal Indexing for

5 Seniors Act of 1993’’.

6 SEC. 2. INFLATION ADJUSTMENTS.

7 (a) GENERAL RULE.—Subsection (c) of section 86 of

8 the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (as amended by the
2

•HR 3194 IH

1 Revenue Reconciliation Act of 1993) is amended by add2 ing at the end thereof the following new paragraph:

3 ‘‘(3) INFLATION ADJUSTMENT TO ADJUSTED

4 BASE AMOUNTS.—In the case of any taxable year be5 ginning in a calendar year after 1994, each dollar

6 amount contained in paragraph (2) shall be in7 creased by an amount equal to—

8 ‘‘(A) such dollar amount, multiplied by

9 ‘‘(B) the cost-of-living adjustment deter10 mined under section 1(f)(3) for the calendar

11 year in which the taxable year begins, by sub12 stituting ‘calendar year 1993’ for ‘calendar year

13 1992’.

14 If any increase determined under the preceding sen15 tence is not a multiple of $50, such increase shall

16 be rounded to the next lowest multiple of $50.’’

17 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by

18 subsection (a) shall apply to taxable years beginning after

19 December 31, 1993.

Æ
# C_2014045EN.01000101.xml

| 15.2.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 45/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.2.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 45/1

---

2014/C 45/01

Last publication of the Court of Justice of the European Union in the Official Journal of the European Union

Official Journal of the European Union

OJ C 39, 8.2.2014

OJ C 39, 8.2.2014

Past publications

Past publications

OJ C 31, 1.2.2014

OJ C 24, 25.1.2014

OJ C 15, 18.1.2014

OJ C 9, 11.1.2014

OJ C 377, 21.12.2013

OJ C 367, 14.12.2013

These texts are available on:

EUR-Lex: http://eur-lex.europa.eu

---
#qfcontent tr.qf-persist div.qf-geobox {
  height: 80px !important;
}
U.S. flag
              An official website of the United States government





---

close


Croatia
 Basic Facts Population
 People per sq. km
 Males per 100 females
 Children per woman
 Goods exported from U.S.
 Goods imported to U.S.
 Change in exports from U.S. for 2013 to 2022
 A Closer Look Source
 Comparisons
 Compared to the U.S.
 Compared to the World
 K = Thousands
				M = Millions
				B = Billions
  Merchandise Trade U.S. Trade in Manufactured Goods
 Top Exported Goods by U.S. State or Territory
 Population Current and Projected Population
 Population by Age and Sex
 Source and Notes Source: U.S. Census Bureau, International Database (demographic data) and USA Trade Online (trade data); Central Intelligence Agency, The World Fact Book (country reference maps). This application presents data for 228 countries and areas of the world with a 2024 population of 5,000 or more. For eleven of those countries and areas, only demographic data are presented. "Data not available" indicates that data are not available from this application.  In such instances, data may be available elsewhere at the census.gov website. Trade figures presented for France do not include data for overseas departments French Guiana, Guadeloupe, Martinique, Mayotte, and Reunion but do include data for dependencies Saint Barthelemy and Saint Martin.  Trade figures for the United Kingdom include data for crown dependencies Guernsey, Isle of Man, and Jersey. To learn more about world population projections, go to Notes on the World Population Clock. To learn more about international trade data, go to Guide to Foreign Trade Statistics. All trade figures are in U.S. dollars on a nominal basis.


CONNECT WITH US
 Information Quality
                    Data Linkage Infrastructure
                    Data Protection and Privacy Policy
                    Accessibility      
                    FOIA
                    Inspector General
                    No FEAR Act
                    U.S. Department of Commerce
                    USA.gov
  Measuring America's People, Places, and Economy
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
No. 1D 18

- 3281

_____________________________
P RESTON P AMPHILE ,
Petitioner
,

v.

S TATE OF F LORIDA , Respondent

.

_____________________________

Petition for Belated Appeal

— Origi nal Jurisdiction

.

December 31, 2018

P ER C URIAM

. This timely sworn petition seeks belated appeal of a September 18, 2017, order declaring Petitioner competent to proceed nunc pro tunc to the time of trial. We d ismiss the petition because of a jurisdic tional issue.

After a jury trial, Petitioner was found guilty and judgments and sentences were rendered on December 2, 2014, in Leon County Circuit Court case number 2014

- CF

- 1428. In 2016, Petitioner filed a petition alleging ineffective assistance of appellate counsel raising four grounds. The petition was granted in part, the judgments and sentences were reversed, and the cause was remanded for further proceedings on the question of establishing Petitioner’s competency at the time of trial. See2 Pamp hile v. State , 216 So. 3d 765 (Fla. 1st DCA 2017). On remand, the circuit court issued a nunc pro tunc order on the competency issue, but did not re

- enter the judgments and sentences. An order on competency is not independently reviewable under rule 9.14 0(b), Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure.

Because no appealable order has been rendered by the circuit court, the petition for belated appeal is d ismissed

.
L EWIS , W INOKUR , and J AY , JJ., concur

.

_____________________________ Not final until dispos ition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________

Preston Pamphile, pro se
, Petitioner

. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General
, Samuel B. Steinberg and Jason W. Rodriguez, Assistant Attorneys Genera l, Tallahassee
, for Respondent

.
<PAGE>

                                                                  EXHIBIT 10.24

                                  [ITeX LOGO]


June 3, 2000


Ying Shiau
1204 Wilhelmina Way
San Jose, CA 95120

Dear Ying,

I am pleased to confirm our offer to you for regular, full-time exempt
employment as Vice President of Manufacturing Services with Integrated
Telecom Express. Based in Santa Clara, Calif. you will report directly to Bob
Gardner, Chief Operating Officer.

We are offering you a salary paid at the rate of $5,769.23 per pay period
(the equivalent of $150.00 per year) which will be paid bi-weekly during the
term of your employment. Additionally, health and dental/vision insurance
plans are available starting on the first day of the calendar month following
your date of hire. Subject to approval by ITeX's Board of Directors, you will
be granted options to purchase 155,000 shares of the common stock of ITeX at
a price to be decided by the Board. These options are to vest over four years
according to ITeX's standard vesting schedule commencing from the date of
hire. Should you leave ITeX during the vesting period, your options will
cease to accrue, as more fully described in ITeX's option plan. You will also
be granted options to purchase 50,000 shares of the restricted stock of ITeX
at a price also to be determined by the board. The details of these
restricted shares are explained in detail in ITeX's Restricted Stock Option
Plan.

By countersigning this letter, you accept our offer and confirm that (i) you
are not a party to any employment agreement or other contract or arrangement
which prohibits your full time employment with ITeX, (ii) you will not
disclose any trade secret or confidential information of any third party to
ITeX, and (iii) you do not know of any conflict which would restrict your
employment with ITeX.

Your employment with ITeX is "at will" and is of no specific duration.
However, our intent is to provide the tools and environment that will help
you achieve the highest level of success.

If you have any questions concerning this offer, please contact me
immediately at (408) 513-9220. If you accept our offer, please sign this
offer letter where indicated and fill out and sign the attached Application
for Employment form and return them to me or fax them to my private fax
number (408) 579-0194. This offer will expire of its own accord if it is not
accepted in writing by 5pm on June 9, 2000.

I am personally delighted that you will be joining the ITeX team and we are
looking forward to working with you. Welcome aboard!


Sincerely,                            Accepted and agreed




/s/ DOUGLAS B. LINN                  By: /s/ YING SHIAU
--------------------------              --------------------------------------
Douglas B. Linn
Director of Human Resources          Start Date:  6/6/00
                                                ------------------------------
                                                (Start Date by 7/5/00 expected
                                                on or before 7/5/00)



                       Integrated Telecom Express, Inc.
                                   [ADDRESS]
#### Fred O. DICKINSON, Jr., as Comptroller of the State of Florida, et al., Appellants, v. SWIFT & COMPANY, a corporation and Swift Agricultural Chemicals Corporation, a corporation, Appellees.

No. S-120.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

May 22, 1973.

Larry Levy and J. W. Chalkley, III, Tallahassee, for appellants.

L. Robert Frank, of Allen, Dell, Frank & Trinkle, Tampa, for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

This cause having been orally argued before the Court, the briefs and record on appeal having been read and given full consideration, and the appellants having failed to demonstrate reversible error, the order of the lower court appealed from herein is affirmed. See State ex rel. Drum Service Company of Florida v. Kirk, 234 So.2d 358 (Fla.1970) and Dickinson et al. v. Stauffer Chemical Company, etc., 268 So.2d 396 (Fla.App.1972).

CARROLL, DONALD, K., Acting C. J., and RAWLS and JOHNSON, JJ., concur.
<PAGE>




                                                                    EXHIBIT 24.8

                  Certified Resolution as to Power of Attorney



      The undersigned hereby certifies on behalf of Carrier1 International S.A.,
a societe anonyme organized under the laws of the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg (the
"Company") that the Board of Directors of the Company at a meeting held on
August 2, 2000, duly adopted resolutions substantially in the form of the
following; and that said resolutions are in full force and effect:

      that any Authorized Officer (as defined below), be, and each of them
      hereby is, authorized and empowered to execute and cause the Registration
      Statement to be filed with the Commission, in the name and on behalf of
      the Company, with such changes therein as such officers executing the same
      shall deem necessary or advisable and shall approve, such approval to be
      conclusively evidenced by such execution; and that each of the Authorized
      Officers be, and hereby is, authorized to prepare or cause to be prepared,
      to execute in the name and on behalf of the Company, and cause to be filed
      with the Commission, such amendments (including, without limitation, any
      pre-effective and post-effective amendments and any subsequent
      registration statements pursuant to Rule 462(b) under the Securities Act)
      to the Registration Statement and supplements to the prospectus or
      prospectuses forming a part thereof as such officers may deem necessary or
      advisable, an "AUTHORIZED OFFICER" being any one of (i) the members of the
      Board of Directors of the Company, (ii) Stig Johansson, Eugene A. Rizzo,
      Kees van Ophem, Neil E. Craven, Terje Nordahl, Joachim W. Bauer and (iii)
      any other person designated by one or more members of the Board of
      Directors of the Company to act on his or her behalf;

      WHEREBY, the Company has caused this certificate to be executed on its
behalf by the undersigned this 2nd day of August, 2000.


                                          /s/ Kees van Ophem
                                          ------------------------------
                                          Name: Kees van Ophem
                                          Title: Vice President, Purchase
                                                 and General Counsel
# C_2012314EN.01000201.xml

| 18.10.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 314/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.10.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 314/2

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

17 October 2012

2012/C 314/02

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,3120 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 103,23 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4592 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,81150 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 8,6587 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,2106 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 7,3960 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 24,794 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 279,00 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,6962 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,1029 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,5777 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,3629 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,2690 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,2915 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 10,1704 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,6009 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,5954 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 450,48 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 11,3669 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 8,2059 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,5405 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 12 577,46 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 3,9769 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 53,896 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 40,2880 |
| THB | Thai baht | 40,187 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 2,6676 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 16,8231 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 69,3590 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,3120

JPY

Japanese yen

103,23

DKK

Danish krone

7,4592

GBP

Pound sterling

0,81150

SEK

Swedish krona

8,6587

CHF

Swiss franc

1,2106

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

7,3960

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

24,794

HUF

Hungarian forint

279,00

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,6962

PLN

Polish zloty

4,1029

RON

Romanian leu

4,5777

TRY

Turkish lira

2,3629

AUD

Australian dollar

1,2690

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,2915

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

10,1704

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,6009

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,5954

KRW

South Korean won

1 450,48

ZAR

South African rand

11,3669

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

8,2059

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,5405

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

12 577,46

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

3,9769

PHP

Philippine peso

53,896

RUB

Russian rouble

40,2880

THB

Thai baht

40,187

BRL

Brazilian real

2,6676

MXN

Mexican peso

16,8231

INR

Indian rupee

69,3590

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
EX-10.27



 Exhibit 10.27 
  





 
 March 1, 2016 

Thomas A. Peterson 
 Dear Tom:

 This will confirm our discussions over the past couple weeks about the CFO position. 

You will be appointed CFO effective immediately. Your new salary will be $285k and you will be eligible for the company merit adjustment on
June 1. Your new salary will be retroactive to February 1, 2016 when we first discussed. 
 You will be eligible for up to a 70% bonus
starting with the 2016 calendar year. You will receive a new tranche of equity at the CFO level along with other senior management in the next couple weeks. That equity will begin to vest on January 1, 2016. 

In the event there is a change of control of the company or the company goes public (the “Event”), you will be eligible for a
severance payment equal to 12 months of your then existing base salary if you are not asked to remain in your present position for a minimum of one year, with the same or substantially the same duties. After one year from such an Event or in the
event you voluntarily resign your position prior to said time or in the event of a termination for Cause as defined below, you will no longer be eligible for a severance payment. 

Further, in the event you are terminated for other than Cause and if you have not voluntarily resigned your position prior to April 9, 2018,
you will be paid the following amounts on the schedule noted below that otherwise would have been distributed to you on your normal vesting schedule had you remained employed by the Company, which amounts have been deposited on your behalf in the
Hostess Management account attributable to the first tranche of equity that you received as of April of 2013. 
 a) If terminated before
4/9/16, $100k would accelerate ($400k remainder paid as scheduled on 4/9/17 and 4/9/18) 
 b) If terminated between 4/9/16 and 4/9/17, $200k
would accelerate ($200k remainder paid as scheduled on 4/9/18) 
 c) If terminated between 4/9/17 and 4/9/18, $200k would accelerate (no
remainder to be paid out on 4/9/18) 
 Cause for purposes of this Offer shall be defined as fraud or misappropriation of corporate funds,
your commission of a felony, gross neglect of your duties as CFO, violation of a corporate rule or regulation that results in termination or any action which would disqualify you from serving as a CFO in a public company under SEC or other
applicable rules. 
 Congrats on this. Let me know by email if ok, and we’ll get to Matt for processing. 

 

	
	 Sincerely,

	
	 Michael J. Cramer

	 





	 Chief Administrative Officer



 Hostess Brands, LLC / P.O. Box 419593 / Kansas City, MO 64141-6593
#### Marie W. SHARPE, a single woman, Appellant, v. HERMAN A. THOMAS, INC., a Florida corporation, Appellee.

No. 67-703.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Third District.

Nov. 7, 1967.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
Exhibit
32



CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In
connection with the quarterly report of KinerjaPay Corp. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September
30, 2017 (the “Report”), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Meigisonnata
Widjaja, CFO of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:



1.
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
and



2.
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.



|/s/
    Meigisonnata Widjaja | 
|---------------------------- | 
|Meigisonnata
    Widjaja     | 
|CFO                          | 
|Dated:
    December 8, 2017  | 



A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to KinerjaPay Corp. and will be retained by
the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.