alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-6063

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

RAYED FAWZI ABED,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western

District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Samuel G. Wilson, Chief District

Judge. (CR-97-24-R, CA-01-383-7)

Submitted: June 20, 2002 Decided: June 26, 2002

Before MICHAEL and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Marcia Gail Shein, LAW OFFICE OF MARCIA G. SHEIN, P.C., Decatur,

Georgia, for Appellant. Thomas Jack Bondurant, Jr., Assistant

United States Attorney, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Rayed Fawzi Abed seeks to appeal the district court’s order

denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.

2001). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion

and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate

of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the

district court. United States v. Abed, Nos. CR-97-24-R; CA-01-383-

7 (W.D. Va. Oct. 22, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

DISMISSED
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

JAMES M. KUSH,

Petitioner

v.

WORKERS' COMPENSATION APPEAL BOARD (POWER CONTRACTING COMPANY),

Respondents :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 241 WAL 2018

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from

the Order of the Commonwealth Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 5th day of December, 2018

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED

.
EXHIBIT
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Annual Report of Centenary International Corporation (the
“Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2009, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,
Carlos Fabian De Sousa, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:





(1)
            the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





(2)
            the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of the operations of the
      Company.





/s/ Carlos Fabian De
  Sousa


Carlos
Fabian De Sousa


Chief
Executive Officer


March 22,
2010





This
certification accompanies this Report pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, be deemed filed by Registrant for the purposes of §18 of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. This certification shall not be incorporated
by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made before or after
the date of this Report), irrespective of any general incorporation language
contained in such filing.





A signed
original of this written statement required by §906 has been provided to the
Registrant and will be retained by the Registrant and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### INTERNATIONAL GRANITE *&*MARBLE CORPORATION, a New York corporation, Appellant, v. SEA LEDGE PROPERTIES, INC., a Florida corporation, McDonough Overseas, Inc., et al., Appellees.

No. 1522.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Fourth District.

Sept. 20, 1968.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
# C_2014041EN.01000101.xml

| 12.2.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 41/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.2.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 41/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.7019 — Trimet/EDF/Newco)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2014/C 41/01

On 12 December 2013, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32013M7019. EUR-Lex is the online access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32013M7019. EUR-Lex is the online access to the European law.

---
Exhibit 32.2 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, 

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO 

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of T2 Biosystems, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q/A for the period ending September 30, 2019 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, John M. Sprague, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and 

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company. 

 

| /s/ John M. Sprague                                                           |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| John M. Sprague                                                               |
| Chief Financial Officer

(principal accounting officer and financial officer) |

Date: November 19, 2019 

This certification accompanies each Report pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of §18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. 

A signed original of this written statement required by §906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
**Exhibit 32.1**











Certification of CEO Pursuant to


18 U.S.C. Section 1350,


As Adopted Pursuant to


Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002











In connection with the Annual Report of Crested Corp. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on April __. 2005 (the "Report"), John L. Larsen Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of his knowledge, that:





(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.











/s/ John L. Larsen


John L. Larsen,


Chief Executive Officer


April 12, 2005








This certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Crested Corp. and will be retained by Crested Corp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### Thomas Jefferson JACKSON, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 68-879.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Third District.

April 1, 1969.

Thomas Jefferson Jackson, in pro. per.

Earl Faircloth, Atty. Gen., for appellee.

Before PEARSON, BARKDULL ' and HENDRY, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

This court, proceeding in the manner outlined and recommended by the Supreme Court of the United States in Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 744, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493, having deferred ruling on a motion of the public defender to withdraw as counsel for the indigent defendant-appellant, and having furnished appellant with a copy of the public defender’s memorandum brief, and having allowed the appellant a reasonable specified time within which to raise any points that he chose in support of his appeal, and the appellant having failed to respond thereto, , on consideration thereof upon full examination of the proceedings we conclude that the appeal is wholly frivolous. Whereupon, the public defender’s said motion to withdraw is granted, and the order or judgment appealed is hereby affirmed.
# C_2013148EN.01000101.xml

| 28.5.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 148/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.5.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 148/1

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

27 May 2013

2013/C 148/01

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,2939 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 130,59 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4531 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,85560 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 8,5964 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,2452 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 7,5480 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 25,968 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 289,23 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,7013 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,1935 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,3443 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,3871 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,3405 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,3357 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 10,0453 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,5997 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,6293 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 452,42 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 12,4424 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,9201 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,5620 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 12 676,25 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 3,9190 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 53,811 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 40,5950 |
| THB | Thai baht | 38,636 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 2,6542 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 16,1537 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 71,9100 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,2939

JPY

Japanese yen

130,59

DKK

Danish krone

7,4531

GBP

Pound sterling

0,85560

SEK

Swedish krona

8,5964

CHF

Swiss franc

1,2452

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

7,5480

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

25,968

HUF

Hungarian forint

289,23

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,7013

PLN

Polish zloty

4,1935

RON

Romanian leu

4,3443

TRY

Turkish lira

2,3871

AUD

Australian dollar

1,3405

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,3357

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

10,0453

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,5997

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,6293

KRW

South Korean won

1 452,42

ZAR

South African rand

12,4424

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,9201

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,5620

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

12 676,25

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

3,9190

PHP

Philippine peso

53,811

RUB

Russian rouble

40,5950

THB

Thai baht

38,636

BRL

Brazilian real

2,6542

MXN

Mexican peso

16,1537

INR

Indian rupee

71,9100

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
<TABLE>
                                        EXHIBIT 12 
 
                         PHARMACIA & UPJOHN, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES 
                     COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES 
                             (U.S. dollar amounts in millions) 
 
 
<CAPTION> 
                                      Nine Months          Year Ended December 31, 
                                        Ended 
                                     September 30, 
                                         1998        1997    1996    1995    1994    1993 
                                    --------------   ----    ----    ----    ----    ---- 
<S>                                    <C>          <C>     <C>    <C>     <C>     <C>
Earnings from continuing  
 operations before income taxes        $ 815        $ 468   $ 838  $1,136  $1,271  $  778 
 
Less: Equity in undistributed  
 net income (loss) of companies  
 owned less than 50%                      37          (32)      5       7       8       8 
                                       --------     -----  ------  ------  ------  ------ 
                                         778          500     833   1,129   1,263     770 
 
Add: 
 Amortization of previously  
   capitalized interest                    9           12      11      10       8       6 
 
 Fixed charges included in the above: 
   Interest and amortization of debt  
   expense                                35           58*     82     121     139     209 
 
 Rental expense representative  
  of an interest factor                   30           38      37      35      35      32 
                                       --------     -----  ------  ------  ------  ------ 
Earnings from continuing operations   
 before income taxes and fixed  
 charges                               $ 852        $ 608*  $ 963  $1,295  $1,445  $1,017 
                                       ========     =====  ======  ======  ======  ====== 
Interest incurred and amortization  
 of debt expense                       $  61        $  90   $ 115  $  149  $  164  $  234 
 
Rental expense representative of an  
 interest factor                          30           38      37      35      35      32 
                                       --------     -----  ------  ------  ------  ------ 
 
Total fixed charges                    $  91        $ 128   $ 152  $  184  $  199  $  266 
                                       ========     =====  ======  ====== =======  ====== 
 
Ratio of earnings to fixed charges       9.4          4.8*    6.2     7.0     7.2     3.8 
                                       =====         ====    ====    ====    ====    ==== 
 
 
*Revised from Form 10-K. 
  
</TABLE>
**Exhibit15**

To theBoard of Directors andShareholders of Investors Financial Services Corp:

We havereviewed, in accordance with standards of the Public Company AccountingOversight Board (United States), the unaudited interim financial information ofInvestors Financial Services Corp. and subsidiaries for the periods endedSeptember 30, 2006 and 2005, as indicated in our report dated November 6, 2006;because we did not perform an audit, we expressed no opinion on thatinformation.

We areaware that our report referred to above, which is included in your QuarterlyReport on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2006, is incorporatedby reference in the following Registration Statements:

Filedon Form S-8:

RegistrationStatement No. 333-72786Registration Statement No. 333-79639Registration Statement No. 333-43353Registration Statement No. 333-131145

We alsoare aware that the aforementioned report, pursuant to Rule 436(c) under theSecurities Act of 1933, is not considered a part of the Registration Statementsprepared or certified by an accountant or a report prepared or certified by anaccountant within the meaning of Sections 7 and 11 of that Act.
| /s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP |   |
|-------------------------------|--------|
|                          |
| Boston, Massachusetts         |
| November 6, 2006              |

 

----
Exhibit 32.0
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1.
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and2.
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the consolidated financial condition and results of operations of the Company
as of and for the period covered by the Report.
  By:

/s/
Michael P. GavinMichael P. GavinPresident and Chief Executive Officer,
Chief Financial Officer and Director

(principal executive officer and principal
financial and accounting officer)
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

July 26, 2017

No. 04-17-00144-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF L.R.,III AND A.R. CHILDREN,

From the 216th Judicial District Court, Kerr County, Texas

Trial Court No. 15759A

Honorable Cathy Morris, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

The appellant’s request for appointment of attorney ad-litem is hereby DENIED. 

_________________________________

Irene Rios, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 26th day of July, 2017.

___________________________________

Luz Estrada

Chief Deputy Clerk
#### Rowan E. QUIN v. Lucious H. QUIN and Southwest Gas Producing Co., Inc.

No. 47277.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

Oct. 29, 1973.

Joe N. Pigott, McComb, for appellant.

Jones & Patterson, Brookhaven, Wells, Gerald, Brand, Watters & Cox, A. Jerry Sheldon, Jackson, for appellees.

Appeal from Chancery Court, Lincoln County; Mike Carr, Chancellor.

Before RODGERS, P. J., and SMITH, ROBERTSON, SUGG and BROOM, JJ.

Affirmed.
FIRST AMENDMENT

FIRST AMENDMENT, dated as of January 1, 2001 to the equity forward transaction
(the "Transaction") between Northeast Utilities ("NU") and Bank One, NA
(Illinois) evidenced by the Confirmation dated December 9, 1999 (the
"Confirmation"). Capitalized terms used and not defined herein have the meaning
given to them in the Confirmation.

WHEREAS, the parties hereto desire to amend the Transaction as described herein:

NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual agreements herein, the parties
hereto agree as follows:

1. The Termination Date of the Transaction shall be June 29, 2001, subject to
adjustment in accordance with the Modified Following Business Day Convention,
the terms of the Party B Net Settlement Option, the Party A Optional Termination
and the Party B Optional Termination.

2. January 15, 2001, April 15, 2001 and the Termination Date shall be Party A
Calculation Period Payment Dates with respect to this Transaction.

3. January 2, 2001, January 15, 2001 and April 15, 2001 shall be Calculation
Period Interest Reset Dates with respect to this Transaction.

4.  With effect from the Calculation Period commencing January 4, 2001, the
Spread shall be 2.00 percent .

5. This First Amendment constitutes the entire Agreement and understanding of
the parties with respect to its subject matter and supersedes all oral
communications and prior writings with respect thereto.

6. No amendment, modification or waiver in respect of this First Amendment will
be effective unless in writing (including a writing evidenced by a facsimile
transmission) and executed by each of the parties.

7.  This Amendment may be executed in counterparts each of which shall be
deemed to be an original.

8. This Amendment will be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws
of the State of New York (without reference to choice of law doctrine).

9. Limited Liability. No shareholder or trustee of NU shall be held to any
liability whatever for the payment of any sum of money or for damages or
otherwise under this Amendment, and this Amendment shall not be enforceable
against any such trustee in their or his or her individual capacities or
capacity and this Amendment shall be enforceable against the trustees of NU only
as such, and every person, firm, association, trust or corporation having any
claim or demand arising under this Amendment and relating to NU, its
shareholders or trustees shall look solely to the trust estate of NU for the
payment or satisfaction thereof.


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Amendment as of the date
first above written.

NORTHEAST UTILITIES               BANK ONE, NA

By:                               By:
Name:                             Name:
Title:                            Title:
EXHIBIT 32





CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
AND PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT
OF 2002



I, Kenneth Spiegeland, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of ACM
Corporation on Form 10-Q for the three months ended August 31, 2012 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects
the financial condition and results of operations of ACM Corporation.







|Date: January 18, 2013 | By: /s/ Kenneth Spiegeland      
|---------------------- | --------------------------------
|                       | Kenneth Spiegeland              
|                       | President, Treasurer            
|                       | (Principal Executive Officer,   
|                       | Principal Accounting Officer and
|                       | Principal Financial Officer)
Antidegradation and Variances discussion with ASIWPCA

Wednesday, November 17, 2:00 – 3:30 pm

EPA Headquarters (conference call)

Attendees:

 EPA OW-OST - Grace Robiou, Shari Barash, Christina Christensen, Fred Leutner, 

Chelsea Morris, Heather Goss

 States: [get full list from Sean (?)]

Topics covered:

 Regulatory revision possibilities for antidegradation - possible effects on states, and state 

feedback

 Regulatory revision possibilities for variances - possible effects on states, and state 

feedback
II 

Calendar No. 298 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 1963 

To repeal section 403 of the Bipartisan Budget Act of 2013. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 27, 2014 

Mr. PRYOR (for himself, Mrs. HAGAN, Mrs. SHAHEEN, and Mr. BEGICH) 

introduced the following bill; which was read the first time 

JANUARY 28, 2014 

Read the second time and placed on the calendar 

A BILL 

To repeal section 403 of the Bipartisan Budget Act of 2013. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. REPEAL OF CERTAIN REDUCTIONS MADE BY 

4 THE BIPARTISAN BUDGET ACT OF 2013. 

5 Section 403 of the Bipartisan Budget Act of 2013 

6 (Public Law 113–67) is repealed as of the date of the en7 actment of such Act. 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Calendar No. 298 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 1963 

A BILL 

To repeal section 403 of the Bipartisan Budget Act 

of 2013. 

JANUARY 28, 2014 

Read the second time and placed on the calendar 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
260 La. 133

#### Frank H. PENDER v. NATIONAL FIRE AND MARINE INSURANCE COMPANY.

No. 51923.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Dec. 13, 1971.

In re: Southern Farm Bureau Casualty Insurance Company applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, Parish of Natchitoches. 255 So.2d 95.

Writ refused. No error of law.