alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Jermaine Jennings, Appellant.

[722 NYS2d 141]

—Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Ira Beal, J., at hearing; George Daniels, J., at jury trial and sentence), rendered November 10, 1998, convicting defendant of robbery in the second degree (2 counts), assault in the second degree (2 counts) and reckless endangerment in the first degree, and sentencing him to concurrent terms of 5 to 10 years on each robbery conviction and 3V2 to 7 years on each of the remaining convictions, unanimously affirmed.

The court properly denied defendant’s motion to suppress identification evidence. Defendant met a description that was sufficiently specific under the geographic and temporal circumstances presented herein. Therefore, the officer had reasonable suspicion to stop and detain defendant for investigative purposes, and was entitled to pat down and handcuff defendant as a safety precaution *(see, People v Allen,*73 NY2d 378, 379-380). This detention was not elevated to an arrest when defendant was promptly taken to a nearby location for a showup identification by another officer, who had observed defendant during his efforts to escape *(see, People v Chalwell,*272 AD2d 217, *lv denied*95 NY2d 889).

*286The hospital showup served the purpose of procuring a trustworthy identification while the victims’ memories were fresh *(see, People v Blanche,*90 NY2d 821; *People v Guiterrez,*270 AD2d 184) and was not conducted in an unduly suggestive manner. The victims viewed defendant separately, and without conferring.

A fair reading of the record establishes that defendant’s claim that certain evidence should have been precluded for lack of CPL 710.30 notice was waived *(see,*CPL 710.30 [3]; *People v Kirkland,*89 NY2d 903) and the issue involved was extensively litigated. In any event, any error in this regard would be harmless. Concur — Ellerin, J. P., Lerner, Saxe, Buckley and Friedman, JJ.
United States Environmental Protection Agency

Air Division

Technical Support Document

For The

Ventura County Air Pollution Control District

Rule 2, Definitions

Prepared by: Cynthia G. Allen

Reviewed by: Andrew Steckel

January 2012
AGENCY: Ventura County Air Pollution Control District

Submittal Date: September 27, 2011

Adoption Date: April 12, 2011

Completeness Date: October 24, 2011

Submitted Rule: Rule 2, Definitions

Applicable SIP: Submitted on July 20, 2010 (adopted on January 12, 2010 

and approved on March 7, 2011) (76 FR 12280)

Background:

The USEPA has recently taken steps to add green house gases (GHGs) 

to the list of regulated pollutants. Because the thresholds of significance for 

GHGs are substantially higher than those for criteria and hazardous pollutants, 

EPA is proposing to tailor their regulations to include GHGs. The District has 

determined that certain revisions to District Rules and Regulations are required 

to implement EPA’s tailoring requirements.

Summary:

Ventura County Air Pollution Control District (VCAPCD) Rule 2, 

Definitions, is being amended by adding new definitions and revisions to existing 

definitions. 

New definitions added are Greenhouse Gases (GHGs), Particulate Matter 

(PM-2.5), Portable, and Stationary. 

Revisions to existing definitions are Air Contaminant, Equipment, Motor 

Vehicle, and Stationary Source. 

EPA Evaluation

The Ventura County APCD does not anticipate any emission changes or 

any significant impacts to regulated sources or the APCD resulting from the 

amendments to Rule 2.

There will be no effect on air pollution emissions from Rule 2 since the 

changes are mostly administrative.
EPA is recommending approval of Ventura County APCD Rule 2 under 

section 110(k) as meeting the requirements of section 110(a) and Part D of the 

Clean Air Act, as amended in 1990. 

Attachments

1. Submitted Rule 2, Definitions (adopted April 12, 2011).

2. SIP Approved Rule 2 (adopted January 12, 2010).

3. Strikeout/underline version of Rule 2.
[Cite as Wright v. Hall, 2024-Ohio-803.]

STATE OF OHIO ) IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

)ss: NINTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT

COUNTY OF SUMMIT )

MICHELLE S. WRIGHT

Petitioner

v.

HOWARD E. HALL

Respondent

C.A. No. 31015

ORIGINAL ACTION IN 

PROCEDENDO

Dated: March 6, 2024

PER CURIAM.

{¶1} Petitioner, Michelle Wright, has filed a petition for writ of procedendo naming 

Judge Howard E. Hall as the respondent. Because Ms. Wright’s petition does not comply with the 

mandatory requirements of R.C. 2969.25, this Court must dismiss this action.

{¶2} R.C. 2969.25 sets forth specific filing requirements for inmates who file a civil 

action against a government employee or entity. Judge Hall is a government employee and Ms. 

Wright, incarcerated in the Summit County Jail, is an inmate. R.C. 2969.21(C) and (D). A case 

must be dismissed if the inmate fails to comply with the mandatory requirements of R.C. 2969.25 

in the commencement of the action. State ex rel. Graham v. Findlay Mun. Court, 106 Ohio St.3d 

63, 2005-Ohio-3671, ¶ 6 (“The requirements of R.C. 2969.25 are mandatory, and failure to comply 

with them subjects an inmate’s action to dismissal.”). Ms. Wright failed to comply with R.C. 

2969.25(C) in the filing of her action.
C.A. No. 31015

Page 2 of 3

 

{¶3} Ms. Wright failed to comply with R.C. 2969.25(C). An inmate seeking the waiver 

of filing fees, as Ms. Wright did in this case, must file an affidavit of indigency. Ms. Wright did 

file an affidavit of indigency, but all of the lines to be completed, other than her name, are blank. 

Pursuant to the statute, the affidavit must include, among other things, “[a] statement that sets forth 

the balance in the inmate account of the inmate for each of the preceding six months, as certified 

by the institutional cashier[.]” R.C. 2969.25(C)(1). The Ohio Supreme Court has construed these 

words strictly: an affidavit that “does not include a statement setting forth the balance in [an] 

inmate account for each of the preceding six months” fails to comply with R.C. 2969.25(C)(1). 

(emphasis sic.) State ex rel. Roden v. Ohio Dept. of Rehab. & Corr., 159 Ohio St.3d 314, 2020-

Ohio-408, ¶ 6.

{¶4} Ms. Wright filed a Financial Certificate to be completed by the institution. Some 

of the blanks on the form are filled in, including her name in one place and zeros for six account 

balances, although the months are not noted, and for her name in another place on the form. The 

form is not signed by Ms. Wright of the institutional cashier, but it is notarized.

{¶5} R.C. 2969.25(C) requires the filing of the statement of the prisoner account to be 

certified by the institutional cashier. Ms. Wright did not comply with this mandatory requirement.

{¶6} Because Ms. Wright did not comply with the mandatory requirements of R.C. 

2969.25(C), this case is dismissed. Costs are taxed to Ms. Wright. The clerk of courts is hereby 

directed to serve upon all parties not in default notice of this judgment and its date of entry upon 

the journal. Civ.R. 58.

BETTY SUTTON

FOR THE COURT
C.A. No. 31015

Page 3 of 3

 

CARR, J.

HENSAL, J.

CONCUR.

APPEARANCES:

MICHELLE WRIGHT, Pro se, Petitioner.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FORM 10-K OF
CROWN CRAFTS INC. FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED APRIL 2, 2000, AND IS QUALIFIED IN
ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FORM 10-K.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          APR-02-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             MAR-29-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-02-2000
<CASH>                                           1,453
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   29,012
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     73,269
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               112,489
<PP&E>                                         145,727
<DEPRECIATION>                                  72,705
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 215,004
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           49,001
<BONDS>                                        106,593
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         9,983
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   215,004
<SALES>                                        319,893
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               319,893
<CGS>                                          284,737
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  284,737
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                54,714
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              13,572
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (33,195)
<INCOME-TAX>                                    (4,047)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (29,148)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (29,148)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (3.39)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (3.39)


</TABLE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

In accordance with Title 41 of the U.S. Code of Federal Regulations, Section 102-3.65(a), notice is hereby given that the Charter for the NIH Clinical Center Research Hospital Board was renewed for an additional two-year period on May 29, 2018.

It is determined that the NIH Clinical Center Research Hospital Board is in the public interest in connection with the performance of duties imposed on the National Institutes of Health by law, and that these duties can best be performed through the advice and counsel of this group.

                    Inquiries may be directed to Claire Harris, Acting Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy, Office of the Director, National Institutes of Health, 6701 Democracy Boulevard, Suite 1000, Bethesda, Maryland 20892 (Mail Stop Code 4875),                     *harriscl@nih.gov*                     or Telephone (301) 496-2123.                

Dated: August 2, 2018.

Sylvia L. Neal,

Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2018-16979 Filed 8-7-18; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
#### BRITISH LAW INSURANCE CO. v. JOVAN CORPORATION.

No. 39418.

Supreme Court of Florida.

March 1970.

Certiorari denied without opinion. 229 So.2d 603.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>


<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Donnkenny
Corporation's Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet and Statement of Earnings and
is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED> 
<CIK>                                       0000029693
<NAME>                           DONNKENNY CORPORATION
<MULTIPLIER>                                     1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                           3,998
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   38,990
<ALLOWANCES>                                     9,269
<INVENTORY>                                     46,293
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                95,209
<PP&E>                                          19,567
<DEPRECIATION>                                   7,793
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 139,433
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           39,255
<BONDS>                                         50,761
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           140
<OTHER-SE>                                      55,138
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   139,433
<SALES>                                        255,179
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               255,179
<CGS>                                           57,603
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 1,449
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               5,154
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (11,607)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (3,319)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (8,233)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (8,233)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.59)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        


</TABLE>
U.S. flag
              An official website of the United States government Skip to main content   end of header Census.gov Newsroom Releases Governments
 Newsroom Archive
 Skip left menu navigation
 About the Newsroom
 				Facts for Features
 				**News Releases**
 				Press Kits
 				Tip Sheets
 Release Information CB12-TPS.37 **Contact:**  Public Information Office
301-763-3030/763-3762 (fax)
 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:  THURSDAY, JUNE 28, 2012 Quarterly Survey of Public Pensions: 1st Quarter 2012 This quarterly survey (formerly known as the Finances of Selected State and Local Government Employee Retirement Systems Survey) provides national summary statistics on the revenues, expenditures and composition of assets of the 100 largest state and local public employee retirement systems in the United States. These 100 systems comprise 89.4 percent of financial activity among such entities, based on the 2007 Census of Governments. This survey presents the most current statistics about investment decisions by state and local public employee retirement systems, which are among the largest types of institutional investors in the U.S. financial markets. These statistical tables are published three months after each calendar quarter and show national financial transactions and trends for the past five years. For more information, please visit <https://www.census.gov/govs/qpr/>. **No news release associated with this report. Tip Sheet only.**
  CONNECT WITH US

Information Quality
                    Data Linkage Infrastructure
                    Data Protection and Privacy Policy
                    Accessibility      
                    FOIA
                    Inspector General
                    No FEAR Act
                    U.S. Department of Commerce
                    USA.gov
                   Measuring America's People, Places, and Economy
<PAGE>

                                                                      Exhibit 23

                                                                    [Letterhead]
                                                           Deloitte & Touche LLP
                                                            Two Prudential Plaza
                                                        180 North Stetson Avenue
                                                        Chicago, Illinois  60601



INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No.
333-62622 of John Deere Capital Corporation on Form S-3 of our report dated
November 20, 2001, appearing in the Annual Report on Form 10-K of John Deere
Capital Corporation for the year ended October 31, 2001, and to the reference to
us under the heading "Experts" in the Prospectus, which is part of such
Registration Statement.


DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
Chicago, Illinois

January 8, 2002
**Exhibit 32**

** **

CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTEDPURSUANT TO

SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

The undersigned, theChief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer of Beach First NationalBancshares, Inc. (the “Company”), each certify that, to his knowledge onthe date of this certification:

 

1.               The quarterly report of the Company forthe period ended March 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on this date (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.               The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

 

 
|   | /s/ Walter E.  Standish, III |
|--------|-----------------------------------|
|   | Walter  E. Standish, III     |
|   | Chief  Executive Officer          |
|   | May 9, 2008                  |
|   |                              |
|   | /s/Gary S. Austin                 |
|   | Gary  S. Austin                   |
|   | Chief  Financial Officer          |
|   | May 9, 2008                  |

 

----
#### Alyce Ann LATUSEK, Petitioner, v. MOSAM CORPORATION, the Home Indemnity Company and the Florida Industrial Commission, Respondents.

No. 35366.

Supreme Court of Florida,

Nov. 9, 1966.

Rehearing Denied Nov. 29, 1966.

Charles F. Lindsay and Allen Clements, Miami, for petitioner.

Andrew L. Richard, Jr., Edwin H. Underwood, Jr., Wakefield & Underwood, Miami, Patrick H. Mears, Tallahassee, and J. Franklin Garner, Lakeland, for respondents.

PER CURIAM.

By petition for a writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission bearing date March 22, 1966.

We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 31 F.S.A,

Our consideration of the petition, the record and briefs leads us to conclude that there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law.

The petition is therefore denied.

The petition for attorney’s fees filed by Petitioner is also denied.

THORNAL, C. J., and THOMAS, ROBERTS, DREW and ERVIN, JJ., concur.
~~121 J ElECTRfC POWER ~~- RESEARCH INSTITUTE 

July 31, 2007 

Ronald Jordan 

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 

Ariel Rios Building 

1200 Pennsylvania Ave., N.W. 

Mail Code 4303T 

Washington, DC 20460 

Dear Mr. Jordan, 

As you requested, please find attached two copies each of the following reports 

summarizing EPRI's research efforts in characterizing power plant flue gas desulfurization 

(FGD) wastewater constituents. The reports attached are as follows: 

• Flue Gas Desulfurization (FGD) Wastewater CharaCterization: Screening Study 

(1010162) 

• EPRI Technical Manual: Guidance for Assessing Wastewater Impacts of FGD Scrubbers 

(1013313) 

• The Fate of Mercury Absorbed in Flue Gas Desulfurization (FGD) Systems (1009955) 

• Update to 1009955: Update on Enhanced Mercury Capture by Wet FGD: Technical 

Update. EPRI and the U.S. Deparbnent of Energy National Energy Technology 

Laboratory. (1012673). EPA did not specifically include this report in its request; 

however this Update is useful in providing the latest results. 

These reports are being provided to EPA to inform the Agency in its Effluent Guidelines 

Study of the Steam Electric industry. EPRI requests that these reports be used for purposes 

of this study only, and that the EPA not make the reports available to any third party or the 

public. Not only do the reports have information that EPRI subjects to license, these reports 

have economic value to EPRI. If the EPA allows access to the reports by others, this may 

affect EPRI's ability to provide the EPA other reports at no cost in the future. 

Please also find attached a report providing EPRI's perspectives on these wastewater 

characterization studies. Because of the R&D nature of much of this work as well as 

additional reasons discussed in the report, the FGD studies are likely not representative of 

FGD across the industry as a whole. Because of this, EPRI believes it is critical that we 

provide our perspectives on the background and objectives of these studies, as well as the 

potential limitations of the results from these studies. We have provided our perspectives on 
these data, but believe that the results are of limited benefit especially when EPA and EPRI 

are plarm.ing more wastewater specific studies of wet FGD systems. 

EPA had requested the Proceedings to the EPRI Workshop on Impact of FGDs on 

Wastewater. EPRI never published the proceedings of this workshop. TI1e intent of this 

workshop was to update utilities on the potential wastewater issues, encourage informal 

discussion of individual company issues, and to provide EPRI R&D direction. 

If you have any questions, please contact me at 650 855 2812 or pchu@epri.com. 

Paul Om 

Senior Project Manager 

Environment Sector 

EPRI
# C_2014408EN.01003701.xml

| 15.11.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 408/37 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.11.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 408/37

---

ENIAC JOINT UNDERTAKING

Publication of the final accounts for the financial year 2013

2014/C 408/37

The complete version of the final accounts may be found at the following address:

http://www.eniac.eu/web/documents/budget.php

---