alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO**

**18U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**ASADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with theReport on Form 10-Q of Investors Financial Services Corp. (the “Company”) forthe period ending June 30, 2004 as filed on the date hereof (the“Report”), I, Kevin J. Sheehan, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, herebycertify, pursuant to 18. U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

 

1.               TheReport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.               Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

 

 
|     /s/Kevin  J. Sheehan |   |
|----------------------------------------------|--------|
| Kevin J. Sheehan                             |
| Chairman and                                 |
| Chief Executive  Officer                     |

 

August 6,2004

 

A signed original of thiswritten statement required by Section 906 has been provided to InvestorsFinancial Services Corp. and will be retained by Investors Financial ServicesCorp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff uponrequest.

 

 

In connection with theReport on Form 10-Q of Investors Financial Services Corp. (the “Company”) forthe period ending June 30, 2004 as filed on the date hereof (the“Report”), I, John N. Spinney, Jr., Senior Vice President and Chief FinancialOfficer, hereby certify, pursuant to 18. U.S.C. Section 1350, as adoptedpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to myknowledge:

 

1.               TheReport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.               Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

 

 
|     /s/John  N. Spinney, Jr. |   |
|--------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Senior Vice  President and                       |
| Chief  Financial Officer                         |

 

August 6,2004

 

A signed original of thiswritten statement required by Section 906 has been provided to InvestorsFinancial Services Corp. and will be retained by Investors Financial ServicesCorp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff uponrequest.

 

----
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

IN THE INTEREST OF: S.G. A MINOR

PETITION OF: L.G., FATHER :

:

:

:

: No. 410 EAL 2023

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 2nd day of February, 2024

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED

.
[DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________ No. 14

- 13267 Non

- Argument Calendar

________________________ D.C. Docket No. 6:03

- cr - 00065

- PGB

- GJK

- 9 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff

- Appellee,
versus JOHN C. PATTERSON , Defendant

- Appellant.

________________________ Appeal from the Unit ed States District Court for the Middle District of Florida

________________________ (February 20, 2015) Before MARCUS , WILLIAM PRYOR and MARTIN , Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: John C. Patterson , a federal prisoner proceeding pro se, appeals the district court’s dismissal of his “Motion to Compel for Specific Performance of Plea Agreement or Withdraw[a]l of Guilty Plea,” which he filed under the Mandamus

Case: 14-13267 Date Filed: 02/20/2015 Page: 1 of 22 Act, 28 U.S.C. § 1361. Patterson claimed that the government breached a plea agreemen t he signed in 2003. The district cou rt denied relief, concluding that Patterson was not entitled to mandamus because he had an adequate alternative remedy to pursue his claim
. 1 W e affirm. We review for abuse of discretion the district court’s denial of a writ of mandamus
. See In re Stewart , 641 F.3d 1271, 1275 (11th Cir. 2001 ) (per curiam)
. Mandamus is appropriate only if , among other things, no other adequate remedy is available. Cash v. Barnhart , 327 F.3d 1252, 1258 (11th Cir. 2003) (per curiam)
. Patterson h ad several remedies. He could have raised his breach

- of

- plea

agreement claim on direct appeal
. See United States v. Copeland , 381 F.3d 1101, 1104

– 05 (11th Cir. 2004). Or he could have raised it in a 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion. See United States v. Al

- Arian , 514 F.3d 1184, 1191 (11th Cir. 2008) (per curiam)
. He did neither. For that reason, the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying mandamus
. AFFIRMED.

1 The district court alternatively construed Patterson’s filing as a 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion and dismissed it as successive. Patterson has neither obtained a certificate of appealability on this issue nor argued that it was error. W e thus consider only the dis trict court’s dismissal under § 1361. Case: 14-13267 Date Filed: 02/20/2015 Page: 2 of 2
#### William J. TURNER, Appellant, v. TRADE-MOR, INC., a Florida corporation, Appellee.

No. 1288.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Fourth District.

June 28, 1968.

Rehearing Denied July 16, 1968.

J. Russell Hornsby and William A. Jacob of Law Office of J. Russell Hornsby, Orlando, for appellant.

Eli H. Subin of Roth, Segal & Levine, Orlando, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed on authority of Cloud v. Fallis, Fla. 1959, 110 So.2d 669.

CROSS and McCAIN, JJ., and PATTEN, GEORGE L., Associate Judge, concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS  SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  SUMMARY  FINANCIAL   INFORMATION  EXTRACTED  FROM  THE
ACCOMPANYING CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF DATATMETRICS CORPORATION AS OF
AND FOR THE TWELVE MONTH  PERIOD ENDED  OCTOBER 25, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                    1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              OCT-25-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   OCT-25-1998
<CASH>                                                        228
<SECURITIES>                                                    0
<RECEIVABLES>                                               1,979
<ALLOWANCES>                                                    0
<INVENTORY>                                                 4,140
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                            6,402
<PP&E>                                                      7,407
<DEPRECIATION>                                              5,100
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                             12,719
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                       5,269
<BONDS>                                                         0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                           0
<PREFERRED>                                                     0
<COMMON>                                                      156
<OTHER-SE>                                                 37,910
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                               12,719
<SALES>                                                     7,742
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                            7,742
<CGS>                                                       5,570
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                               5,570
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                            4,917
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                            518
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                            (3,263)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                    7
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                        (3,270)
<DISCONTINUED>                                                  0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                 0
<CHANGES>                                                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                               (3,270)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                (.22)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                (.22)
        


</TABLE>
# C_2013195EN.01000102.xml

| 6.7.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 195/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.7.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 195/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.6900 — Borealis/Rosier/GPN)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2013/C 195/02

On 3 June 2013, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32013M6900. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32013M6900. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.

---
-82 -80 -78 -76 -74

36 38 40 

### ★
▲ ▲ ▲ ▲



### ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ 500 1000 1500 1000 18 12 06 00 09/26 

### NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL 

## Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 26 Sep 07

EDAS Meteorological DataSource★at 38.90 N 76.65 WMeters AGL
**Exhibit 32.3**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF2002

 

I, Robert E. Gowdy, Jr., as PrincipalAccounting Officer of Einstein Noah Restaurant Group, Inc. (the “Company”),certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(3)   the QuarterlyReport of the Company on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30,2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”),fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(4)   the informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| Dated:  November 6, 2008 | By:  /s/ ROBERT E. GOWDY, Jr.       |
|-------------------------------|------------------------------------------|
|                          | Robert  E. Gowdy, Jr.               |
|                          | Controller  and Chief Accounting Officer |

 

----
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 3186

To designate the United States courthouse located in Houma, Louisiana,

as the ‘‘George Arceneaux, Jr., United States Courthouse’’.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

SEPTEMBER 29, 1993

Mr. TAUZIN (for himself, Mr. HAYES, Mr. JEFFERSON, Mr. FIELDS of Louisiana, Mr. LIVINGSTON, Mr. MCCRERY, and Mr. BAKER of Louisiana) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Public Works and Transportation

A BILL

To designate the United States courthouse located in Houma,

Louisiana, as the ‘‘George Arceneaux, Jr., United States

Courthouse’’.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

4 The United States courthouse located at 800 East

5 Main Street in Houma, Louisiana, is designated as the

6 ‘‘George Arceneaux, Jr., United States Courthouse’’.

7 SEC. 2. LEGAL REFERENCES.

8 Any reference in a law, regulation, document, record,

9 map, or other paper of the United States to the courthouse
2

•HR 3186 IH

1 referred to in section 1 is deemed to be a reference to

2 the ‘‘George Arceneaux, Jr., United States Courthouse’’.

Æ
U.S. flag
              An official website of the United States government





---

close


back button
 Mexico source
 Print Share
 Basic Facts Population
 People per sq. km
 Males per 100 females
 Children per woman
 Goods exported from U.S.
 Goods imported to U.S.
 Change in exports from U.S. for 2014 to 2023
 A Closer Look Source
 Comparisons
 Compared to the U.S.
 Compared to the World
 K = Thousands
                M = Millions
                B = Billions
  Merchandise Trade U.S. Trade in Manufactured Goods
 Top Exported Goods by U.S. State or Territory
 Population Current and Projected Population
 Population by Age and Sex
 Source and Notes Source: U.S. Census Bureau, International Database (demographic data) and USA Trade Online (trade data); Central Intelligence Agency, The World Fact Book (country reference maps). This application presents data for 228 countries and areas of the world with a 2024 population of 5,000 or more. For eleven of those countries and areas, only demographic data are presented. "Data not available" indicates that data are not available from this application.  In such instances, data may be available elsewhere at the census.gov website. Trade figures presented for France do not include data for overseas departments French Guiana, Guadeloupe, Martinique, Mayotte, and Reunion but do include data for dependencies Saint Barthelemy and Saint Martin.  Trade figures for the United Kingdom include data for crown dependencies Guernsey, Isle of Man, and Jersey. To learn more about world population projections, go to Notes on the World Population Clock. To learn more about international trade data, go to Guide to Foreign Trade Statistics. All trade figures are in U.S. dollars on a nominal basis.


CONNECT WITH US
 Information Quality
                    Data Linkage Infrastructure
                    Data Protection and Privacy Policy
                    Accessibility      
                    FOIA
                    Inspector General
                    No FEAR Act
                    U.S. Department of Commerce
                    USA.gov
  Measuring America's People, Places, and Economy
#### The BEAM, INC., a Florida corporation, Appellant, v. COSMOPOLITAN MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, a New York corporation, Appellee.

No. 67-1029.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Third District.

May 21, 1968.

Rehearing Denied June 11, 1968.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

CARL ELISAS WHITEHEAD,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 427 WAL 2018

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 20th day of March, 2019, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.

Justice Wecht did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.
U.S. flag
              An official website of the United States government Skip to main content   end of header Census.gov Newsroom Releases Miscellaneous
 Newsroom Archive
 Skip left menu navigation
 About the Newsroom
 				Facts for Features
 				**News Releases**
 				Press Kits
 				Tip Sheets
 Release Information CB12-R.30 **Contact:**  Public Information Office
301-763-3030
 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:  FRIDAY, OCT. 12, 2012 Census Bureau Names Saeed Fahia to National Advisory Committee on Racial, Ethnic and Other Populations The U.S. Census Bureau announced today the establishment of the National Advisory Committee on Racial, Ethnic and Other Populations and has named Saeed Fahia as a member of the committee. The National Advisory Committee will advise the Census Bureau on a wide range of variables that affect the cost, accuracy and implementation of the Census Bureau’s programs and surveys, including the once-a-decade census. The committee, which is comprised of 32 members from multiple disciplines, will advise the Census Bureau on topics such as housing, children, youth, poverty, privacy, race and ethnicity, as well as lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender and other populations. “We expect that the expertise of this committee will help us meet emerging challenges the Census Bureau faces in producing statistics about our diverse nation,” said Thomas Mesenbourg, the Census Bureau’s acting director. “By helping us better understand a variety of issues that affect statistical measurement, this committee will help ensure that the Census Bureau continues to provide relevant and timely statistics used by federal, state and local governments as well as business and industry in an increasingly technologically oriented society.” The National Advisory Committee members, who serve at the discretion of the Census Bureau director, are chosen to serve based on expertise and knowledge of the cultural patterns, issues and/or statistical needs of hard-to-count populations. **Saeed Fahia** is the executive director of the Confederation of Somali Community of Minnesota. He has a bachelor’s degree in physics from Somali National University, a master’s degree in physics from Eastern Michigan University and a doctorate in education from the University of Massachusetts. Fahia seeks to enhance the lives of Somalis in Minnesota by strengthening their capacity to become contributing members of society, while preserving their culture, delivering appropriate advocacy services, working to unite groups in Minnesota and educating the community-at-large about Somali people. He creates and supervises programs to assist Somalis to resettle in Minnesota and integrate successfully into American life.
  CONNECT WITH US

Information Quality
                    Data Linkage Infrastructure
                    Data Protection and Privacy Policy
                    Accessibility      
                    FOIA
                    Inspector General
                    No FEAR Act
                    U.S. Department of Commerce
                    USA.gov
                   Measuring America's People, Places, and Economy
# C_2012156EN.01001401.xml

| 2.6.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 156/14 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.6.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 156/14

---

Corrigendum to the call for expressions of interest for the members of the Scientific Committee of the European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights (FRA) — Ref.: CEI-SCIE-2012

(
  Official Journal of the European Union C 152 of 30 May 2012
  )

Official Journal of the European Union C 152 of 30 May 2012

2012/C 156/10

On page 11, under ‘9.DEADLINE’, first paragraph:

DEADLINE

for:

‘The closing date for submission of applications is 4 July 2012 at 13.00 (local time, GMT +1).’,

read:

‘The closing date for submission of applications is 11 July 2012 at 13.00 (local time, GMT +1).’.

---
257 La. 976

#### Ronald FURNESS, Individually and as Administrator of the Estate of his Minor Daughter, Wendy Furness v. AMERICAN MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY et al.

No. 51169.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

March 3, 1971.

In re: Ronald Furness, Individually and as Administrator of the Estate of his Minor Daughter, Wendy Furness, applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, Parish of Orleans. 242 So.2d 273.

Writ refused. On the facts found by the Court of Appeal, the result is correct.
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 2996

To amend the Community Reinvestment Act of 1977 to exempt small depository institutions and depository institutions located in small towns and

rural areas from the requirements of such Act.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

AUGUST 6, 1993

Mr. SLATTERY introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Banking, Finance and Urban Affairs

A BILL

To amend the Community Reinvestment Act of 1977 to

exempt small depository institutions and depository institutions located in small towns and rural areas from

the requirements of such Act.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Community Reinvest5 ment Act Amendments of 1993’’.
2

•HR 2996 IH

1 SEC. 2. EXEMPTION FOR SMALL AND RURAL DEPOSITORY

2 INSTITUTIONS.

3 The Community Reinvestment Act of 1977 (12

4 U.S.C. 2901 et seq.) is amended by adding at the end

5 the following new section:

6 ‘‘SEC. 809. EXEMPTION FOR SMALL AND RURAL BANKS.

7 ‘‘This title shall not apply to a regulated financial in8 stitution—

9 ‘‘(1) the total assets of which do not exceed

10 $100,000,000; and

11 ‘‘(2) which is located in a rural area or in a

12 town with a population of 50,000 or less.

Æ
Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathawa y A lton Thomas Davis,

J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk November 22, 2010

d1115 

# Order

November 22, 2010

141049-51

ROBIN DECKER, as Next Friend of ERIC DECKER, a Minor, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 141049-51 COA: 284155; 285870; 290633 Montcalm CC: 06-007819-NH MICHAEL STOIKO, M.D., SPECTRUM HEALTH HOSPITALS, INC., d/b/a BUTTERWORTH HOSPITAL, and SPECTRUM HEALTH HOSPITALS, INC., d/b/a DEVOS CHILDREN’S HOSPITAL, Defendants-Appellants,

and

MICHAEL ROCHOWIAK, D.O., ALBERTO BETANCOURT, M.D., CARSON CITY HOSPITAL, d/b/a CENTER FOR WOMEN’S HEALTH CARE, and CARSON CITY HOSPITAL, INC., Defendants-Appellees,

and

BLUE CROSS BLUE SHIELD, Intervening Plaintiff.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the applicati on for leave to appeal the March 30, 2010 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.