alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 23.1

                         Consent of Independent Auditors

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement Number
33-18690 on Form S-8 dated December 21, 1987, in Registration Statement Number
33-28080 on Form S-8 dated April 11, 1989, in Registration Statement Number
33-28084 on Form S-8 dated April 11, 1989, in Registration Statement Number
33-38176 on Form S-8 dated December 20, 1990, in Registration Statement Number
33-28075 on Form S-3 dated April 11, 1989, in Registration Statement Number
33-61290 on Form S-8 dated April 19, 1993, in Registration Statement Number
333-00133 on Form S-8 dated January 10, 1996, in Registration Statement Number
333-89729 on Form S-8 dated October 26, 1999, in Registration Statement Number
333-35652 on Form S-8 dated April 26, 2000, in Registration Statement Number
333-35654 on Form S-8 dated April 26, 2000, in Registration Statement Number
333-98835 on Form S-8 dated August 28, 2002, in Registration Statement Number
333-98873 on Form S-8 dated August 28, 2002, in Registration Statement Number
333-100415 on Form S-8 dated October 8, 2002, and in Registration Statement
Number 333-100477 on Form S-8 dated October 10, 2002 of our report dated October
15, 2002, with respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedule of
Amcast Industrial Corporation and subsidiaries included in this Annual Report
(Form 10-K) for the year ended August 31, 2002.

/s/ Ernst & Young LLP
November 11, 2002
Dayton, Ohio
Blueprint




 





AMENDMENT TO SUBLICENSE AGREEMENT

This Amendment (“Amendment”) to the Sublicense Agreement dated as of August 2, 2007 (the “Agreement”) by and among Endra, Inc., a Delaware corporation (“Endra”), and Optosonics,
Inc. (“Optosonics”) is entered into on this 18th day of January, 2011 (the “Amendment Effective Date”). For purposes hereof, all capitalized terms used herein but not defined herein shall have the meanings given to them in the Agreement.

Pursuant to Section 15.4 of the Agreement, Endra and Optosonics hereby agree as follows:

1. Section 3 .6.3(iii) of the Agreement is hereby deleted and replaced in its entirety as follows:

“(iii)                       The diligence requirement will likewise be satisfied if Endra makes a commercial sale of any Product to any third party no later than forty-five (45) months from the Effective Date (the “Commercialization
Date”); provided however that Endra may, in its sole discretion, extend the Commercialization Date on a month-by-month basis for up to 9 months beyond the forty-five (45) month anniversary of the Effective Date by paying to Optosonics $5,000 for each month that the Commercialization Date is so extended.”

2. The Agreement is hereby confirmed and continues in all respects expect as set forth in Section 1 above. This Amendment shall not constitute or imply a waiver of any rights or obligations under the Agreement or
an admission as to any facts related to the Agreement.

3. Any determination that any provision of this Amendment or any application thereof is invalid, illegal, or unenforceable in any respect in any instance shall not affect the validity, legality, or enforceability
of such provision in any other instance, or the validity, legality, or enforceability of any other provision of this Amendment.

4. No modification, amendment or waiver of any provision of this Amendment shall be effective unless executed in writing by Endra and Optosonics.

5. All rights and obligations hereunder, including matters of construction, validity, and performance, shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the internal laws of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts
and are intended to take effect as sealed instruments.

6. This Amendment may be executed simultaneously in two or more counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original.

[Remainder of Page Intentionally Blank.]

 



1







 



 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused this Amendment to be executed by their duly authorized representatives as of the Amendment Effective Date.

 

ENDRA, INC.

 

 

By:               /s/ Michael Thornton                                                            

Name:          Michael Thornton

Title:            Chief Operating Officer, ENDRA INC.

 

 

OPTOSONICS, INC.

 

 

By:               /s/ Robert Kruger                                                            

Name:          Robert Kruger

Title:            President, OPTOSONICS, INC.

 

 

 

2
# C_2014075EN.01000201.xml

| 14.3.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 75/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.3.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 75/2

---

New national sides of euro circulation coins

2014/C 75/02

Euro circulation coins have legal tender status throughout the euro area. The Commission publishes all new euro coin designs (1) with a view to informing all parties required to handle coins in the course of their work as well as the public at large.

1

Belgium has updated the design of the Belgian national face of euro coins to be produced from 2014 in order to illustrate the change in the position of the Head of State. Coins from previous years featuring the old Belgian national face will remain valid.

| | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 EURO CENT | 2 EURO CENT | 5 EURO CENT | 10 EURO CENT |
| | | | |
| 20 EURO CENT | 50 EURO CENT | 1 EURO | 2 EURO |

Image

Image

Image

Image

1 EURO CENT

2 EURO CENT

5 EURO CENT

10 EURO CENT

Image

Image

Image

Image

20 EURO CENT

50 EURO CENT

1 EURO

2 EURO

Issuing country: Belgium

Date of issue: March 2014

Description of the designs: All the denominations feature the effigy of the new Head of State His Majesty Philippe, King of the Belgians, in profile to the right. To the left of the effigy, the indication of the issuing country ‘BE’ and on top of it the royal monogram. Under the effigy, the mint master mark at the left and the mint mark at the right flank the year of issuance.

The coin's outer ring depicts the 12 stars of the European flag.

The edge lettering on the 2-euro coin is 2 **, repeated six times, alternately upright and inverted.

---

(1)  See OJ C 373, 28.12.2001, p. 1, OJ C 254, 20.10.2006, p. 6 and OJ C 248, 23.10.2007, p. 8 for a reference to the other euro coins.

1

---
### Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h
Elizabeth A. Weave r

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathaway,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk July 26, 2010

s0719 

# Order

July 26, 2010

140873

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 140873 COA: 277919 Macomb CC: 2007-000056-FC JOSEPH HENDRIX, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application fo r leave to appeal th e February 25, 2010 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented s hould be reviewed by this Court.
# C_2013332EN.01001201.xml

| 15.11.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 332/12 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.11.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 332/12

---

Initiation of proceedings

(Case COMP/M.6992 — Hutchison 3G UK/Telefonica Ireland)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2013/C 332/02

On 6 November 2013, the Commission decided to initiate proceedings in the abovementioned case after finding that the notified concentration raises serious doubts as to its compatibility with the internal market. The initiation of proceedings opens a second phase investigation with regard to the notified concentration, and is without prejudice to the final decision on the case. The decision is based on Article 6(1)(c) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004.

The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their observations on the proposed concentration to the Commission.

In order to be fully taken into account in the procedure, observations should reach the Commission not later than 15 days following the date of this publication. Observations can be sent to the Commission by fax (+32 22964301 / 22967244) or by post, under reference COMP/M.6992 — Hutchison 3G UK/Telefonica Ireland, to the following address:

| European Commission |
| --- |
| Directorate-General for Competition |
| Merger Registry |
| 1049 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |

European Commission

Directorate-General for Competition

Merger Registry

1049 Bruxelles/Brussel

BELGIQUE/BELGIË

---
Exhibit










Exhibit 10.11(c)






Executive Officers of
The Scotts Miracle-Gro Company
who are parties to form of
Tier 1 Participation Agreement under
The Scotts Company LLC Executive Severance Plan






	
			
	 
	 
	 

	 
	 
	Effective Date of

	Name and Principal Position
	 
	Tier 1 Participation

	with The Scotts Miracle-Gro Company
	 
	Agreement

	 
	 
	 

	Denise S. Stump, Executive Vice President, Global Human Resources and Chief Ethics Officer
	 
	November 5, 2011

	 
	 
	 

	Michael C. Lukemire, President and Chief Operating Officer
	 
	April 26, 2012

	 
	 
	 

	Ivan C. Smith, Executive Vice President, General Counsel, Corporate Secretary and Chief Compliance Officer
	 
	July 10, 2013

	 
	 
	 

	Thomas Randal Coleman, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
	 
	April 15, 2014
EXHIBIT 32.1

                Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
                             as Adopted Pursuant to
                  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of CFC International,  Inc.
and  subsidiaries  (the  "Company") for the quarter ended  September 30, 2005 as
filed with the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof  (the
"Report"), I, Gregory M. Jehlik, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350,
as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, that, to the
best of my knowledge:

     (1) The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.


Date: November 3, 2005          /s/                     Gregory M. Jehlik
                                -----------------------------------------
                                   Gregory M. Jehlik
                                   President and Chief Executive Officer

This   certification   accompanies  the  Report  pursuant  to  ss.  906  of  the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 and shall not,  except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,  be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of ss.
18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has been
provided by CFC International,  Inc., and will be retained by CFC International,
Inc.  and  furnished to the  Securities  Exchange  Commission  or its staff upon
request.
EXHIBIT 32.2

                             CERTIFICATION PURSUANT
                            TO 18 U.S.C SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Hydron Technologies, Inc. (the
"Registrant") on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2003 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on April 12, 2004, hereof (the "Report"),
the undersigned officers certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.


HYDRON TECHNOLOGIES, INC.


/s/: TERRENCE S. MCGRATH
-------------------------
Terrence S. McGrath
Chief Operating Officer
July 15, 2004

                                       18
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINING SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AT AUGUST 31, 1998 (UNAUDITED) AND THE
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED AUGUST 31, 1998
(UNAUDITED) IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAY-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JUN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               AUG-31-1998
<CASH>                                           5,243
<SECURITIES>                                    18,460
<RECEIVABLES>                                    9,756
<ALLOWANCES>                                       666
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                33,786
<PP&E>                                          17,446
<DEPRECIATION>                                  10,568
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  41,166
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           15,127
<BONDS>                                              2
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            12
<OTHER-SE>                                      26,025
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    41,166
<SALES>                                          9,889
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                13,220
<CGS>                                              437
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    1,519
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                10,608
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   5
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,380
<INCOME-TAX>                                       150
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,230
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,230
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.11<F1>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.10
<FN>
<F1>FOR PURPOSES OF THIS EXHIBIT, PRIMARY MEANS BASIC.
</FN>
        


</TABLE>
#### Preston N. AUCOIN, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Delores Marie WILLIAMS (Alfred), Defendant-Appellant.

No. 4564.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Third Circuit.

March 12, 1974.

Fusilier, Pucheu & Soileau, by A. Gay-nor Soileau, Ville Platte, for defendant-appellant.

Preston N. Aucoin, Ville Platte, for plaintiff-appellee.

Before CULPEPPER, DOMENGEAUX and WATSON, JJ.

CULPEPPER, Judge.

Plaintiff-appellee, Preston N. Aucoin, moves to dismiss the suspensive appeal of the defendant-appellant, Delores Marie Williams, on the grounds that the appellant failed to timely file her appeal bond, and that the amount of the bond was insufficient for a suspensive appeal.

The appellee, Preston N. Aucoin, obtained a judgment on December 6, 1973, for legal fees against the appellant, Delores Marie Williams, for the amount of $29,166.66, plus *7%*interest per annum thereon from August 4, 1971, until paid. The appellant did not apply for a new trial. On December 17, 1973, the defendant was granted a suspensive appeal to this court upon her furnishing bond in the amount of $750.00. The appellant filed her bond on February 5, 1974, some 60 days after the rendition of judgment and long after the 15-day delay for perfecting a sus-pensive appeal. LSA-C.C.P. Art. 2123. The bond, however, was filed within the delay for taking a devolutive appeal, LSA-C.C.P. Art. 2087, and we therefore dismiss the appellant’s suspensive appeal and reinstate her appeal as devolutive. Where the appeal bond is not filed within the delay allowed for a suspensive appeal, but is filed within the delay allowed for a *505devolutive appeal, the appeal will be sustained as a devolutive appeal. This is true notwithstanding the fact that the motion and order of appeal failed to include any mention of a devolutive appeal. R. E. Rabalais & Son, Inc. v. United Bonding Insurance Company, 225 So.2d 23 (La.App. 3rd Cir., 1969); Joffrion v. Sears, Roebuck & Company, 266 So.2d 563 (La.App. 3rd Cir., 1972); Succession of Willie Garrett v. R. W. Garrett, 288 So.2d 659 (La.App. 3rd Cir., 1974).

Since we have dismissed the appellant’s suspensive appeal, the question as to the sufficiency of the suspensive appeal bond is now moot.

For the reasons assigned, the appellant’s suspensive appeal is hereby dismissed, and the appeal is maintained as devolutive.

Suspensive appeal dismissed, appeal entertained as devolutive.
EXHIBIT 32








CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Gilad David, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of Net Profits Ten Inc. on Form 10-Q for the three months ended March 31, 2011 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of Net Profits Ten Inc.





Date:  May 23, 2011





By:/s/ Gilad DavidGilad David,President(Principal Executive Officer
# C_2014227EN.01000501.xml

| 17.7.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 227/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.7.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 227/5

---

Explanatory Notes to the Combined Nomenclature of the European Union

2014/C 227/04

Pursuant to the second indent of Article 9(1)(a) of Council Regulation (EEC) No 2658/87 (1), the Explanatory Notes to the Combined Nomenclature of the European Union (2) are hereby amended as follows:

1

2

| 1. | on page 31, the third paragraph of the explanatory note to CN code ‘
  0304 11 10 Fillets
  ’ is deleted; |
| --- | --- |

1.

on page 31, the third paragraph of the explanatory note to CN code ‘
  0304 11 10 Fillets
  ’ is deleted;

0304 11 10 Fillets

| 2. | on page 31, the third paragraph of the explanatory note to CN codes ‘
  0304 19 01 to 0304 19 39 Fillets
  ’ is deleted. |
| --- | --- |

2.

on page 31, the third paragraph of the explanatory note to CN codes ‘
  0304 19 01 to 0304 19 39 Fillets
  ’ is deleted.

0304 19 01 to 0304 19 39 Fillets

---

(1)  Council Regulation (EEC) No 2658/87 of 23 July 1987 on the tariff and statistical nomenclature and on the Common Customs Tariff (OJ L 256, 7.9.1987, p. 1).

1

(2)  OJ C 137, 6.5.2011, p. 1.

2

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                          16,086
<SECURITIES>                                     1,924
<RECEIVABLES>                                   27,800
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,711
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               362,839
<PP&E>                                       1,760,922
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,315,875
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 888,200
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          372,280
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       206,712
<OTHER-SE>                                      14,408
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   888,200
<SALES>                                         64,449
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                72,267
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  293,162
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               4,865
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (224,769)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (224,760)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 21- SCHEDULE OF SUBSIDIARIES

1.       EasyGrocer.com, Inc.
2.       Fiesta Market, Inc.
3.       Pioneer Food Stores, Inc.
4.       Rose Trucking Corp.
5.       W.R. Activities Corp.
6.       W.R. Hillside Corp.
7.       W.R. Purchasing Corp.
8.       W.R. Service Corp.
9.       W.R. Service II Corp.
10.      W.R. Service III Corp.
11.      W.R. Service IV Corp.
12.      W.R. Service V Corp.
13.      WRCBC Leasing Corp.
14.      WRFT Holdings, Inc.
15.      White Rose, Inc.
16.      White Rose Puerto Rico, LLC
<PAGE>   1
                                   Exhibit 23

                                 THOMAS MONAHAN
                           CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANT
                              208 LEXINGTON AVENUE
                           PATERSON, NEW JERSEY 07502
                              VOICE (973) 790-8775
                               FAX (973) 790-8845

To The Board of Directors and Shareholders
of  Maritime Transport & Technology, Inc.

         I have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheet of Maritime
Transport & Technology, Inc. as of August 31, 1997 and May 31, 1998 and the
related statements of operations, cash flows and shareholders' equity for the
years ended August 31, 1996 and 1997 and for the year ended May 31, 1998. These
financial statements are the responsibility of the company's management. My
responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on
my audit.

         I conducted my audit in accordance with generally accepted auditing
standards. Those standards require that I plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material
misstatement. An audit includes examining on a test basis, evidence supporting
the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes
assessing the accounting principles and significant estimates made by
management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation.
I believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for my opinion.

         In my opinion, the financial statements referred to above present
fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Maritime Transport &
Technology, Inc. as of August 31, 1997 and May 31, 1998 and the related
statements of operations, cash flows and shareholders' equity for the years
ended August 31, 1996 and 1997 and for the year ended May 31, 1998 in conformity
with generally accepted accounting principles.




                                         /s/ Thomas P. Monahan
                                         ---------------------------------------
                                             Thomas P. Monahan, CPA
September 30, 1998
Paterson, New Jersey