alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3317 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3317

To prohibit the United States representative to the United Nations from 
 voting to approve, expand, or extend any United Nations peacekeeping, 
peacemaking, or peace-enforcing operation unless the President notifies 
                     the Congress before that vote.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 19, 1993

  Mr. Rogers introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Foreign Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To prohibit the United States representative to the United Nations from 
 voting to approve, expand, or extend any United Nations peacekeeping, 
peacemaking, or peace-enforcing operation unless the President notifies 
                     the Congress before that vote.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CONGRESSIONAL NOTIFICATION REQUIREMENT REGARDING UNITED 
              NATIONS PEACEKEEPING, PEACEMAKING, AND PEACE-ENFORCING 
              OPERATIONS.

    (a) In General.--The United States representative to the United 
Nations shall not vote to approve, expand, or extend any United Nations 
peacekeeping, peacemaking, or peace-enforcing operation under Chapter 
VI or VII of the Charter of the United Nations unless, at least 15 days 
before such vote, the President notifies the appropriate congressional 
committees of--
            (1) the total estimated cost of the operation;
            (2) the source of funding for the United States 
        contribution to the operation, such as whether such funding 
        will require--
                    (A) a budget request or an amendment to an existing 
                budget request;
                    (B) a reprogramming of existing funds; or
                    (C) a request for supplemental appropriations;
            (3) the anticipated duration and scope of the operation;
            (4) the anticipated termination date of the operation;
            (5) the goals of the operation; and
            (6) the United States interests that will be served by the 
        operation.
    (b) Appropriate Congressional Committees Defined.--For purposes of 
this section, the term ``appropriate congressional committees'' means 
the Committee on Appropriations, the Committee on Armed Services, and 
the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives and 
the Committee on Appropriations, the Committee on Armed Services, and 
the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate.

                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 32





CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
AND PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT
OF 2002



I, Kenneth Spiegeland, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of ACM
Corporation on Form 10-Q for the three months ended November 30, 2012, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects
the financial condition and results of operations of ACM Corporation.







|Date: January 18, 2013 | By: /s/ Kenneth Spiegeland      
|---------------------- | --------------------------------
|                       | Kenneth Spiegeland              
|                       | President, Treasurer            
|                       | (Principal Executive Officer,   
|                       | Principal Accounting Officer and
|                       | Principal Financial Officer)
#### Andrew LEWIS v. Mrs. Sara PAILET d/b/a Jefferson Bottling Co. and Fireman’s Fund American Ins. Co.

No. 60561.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Oct. 26, 1977.

In re: Andrew Lewis applying for certio-rari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, Parish of Orleans, 349 So.2d 338.

Denied.
257 La. 978

#### STATE of Louisiana v. Leah Bernadette HODGES.

No. 51215.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

March 3, 1971.

In re: Leah Bernadette Hodges applying for writs of certiorari, prohibition and mandamus.

Writ refused. The showing made does not warrant the exercise of our supervisory jurisdiction.
Order filed January 10, 2023 

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-22-00370-CV

____________

IN RE TANGSHAN CHENYANG SPORTS EQUIPMENT CO. LTD., 

Relator

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

WRIT OF MANDAMUS

On Appeal from the 189th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2019-50841

ORDER

On May 26, 2022, relator Tangshan Chenyang Sports Equipment Co., Ltd. 

filed a petition for writ of mandamus in this court. See Tex. Gov’t Code 

Ann. § 22.221; see also Tex. R. App. P. 52. Relator asks this court to compel the 

Honorable Scott Dollinger to vacate his May 2, 2022 order granting the motion to 

compel discovery responses in connection with relator’s special appearance. 

Because Judge Dollinger ceased to hold the office of Judge of the 189th 

District Court, Harris County, Texas, we are required to abate this mandamus 

proceeding to permit the respondent’s successor, the Honorable Tamika Craft, to 

consider the decision regarding relator’s request for relief. See Tex. R. App. P. 

7.2(b); see also In re Baylor Med. Ctr. at Garland, 280 S.W.3d 227, 228 (Tex. 2008) 
(orig. proceeding) (“Mandamus will not issue against a new judge for what a former 

one did.”). 

Therefore, we abate this proceeding, treat it as a closed case, and remove it 

from the court’s active docket. This original proceeding is abated until February 9, 

2023, to permit Judge Craft to consider the order underlying relator’s request for 

relief. On or before that date, Judge Craft shall advise the court of the action taken 

on relator’s request by filing a signed order reflecting her ruling concerning relator’s 

request for relief with this court. The court will then consider a motion to reinstate 

or dismiss the original proceeding, as appropriate.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Christopher and Justices Wise and Jewell.
# C_2013273EN.01001501.xml

| 21.9.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 273/15 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.9.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 273/15

---

AVERAGE COSTS OF BENEFITS IN KIND

2013/C 273/07

AVERAGE COSTS OF BENEFITS IN KIND — 2010

(To be applied with regard to EFTA countries for 2010)

To be applied with regard to EFTA countries for 2010

(To be applied with regard to EU Member States between 1 January 2010 and 30 April 2010)

To be applied with regard to EU Member States between 1 January 2010 and 30 April 2010

The annual average costs do not take into account the reduction of 20 % provided for in Articles 94(2) and 95(2) of Council Regulation (EEC) No 574/72 (1).

1

The net monthly average costs have been reduced by 20 %.

I.   Application of Article 94 of Regulation (EEC) No 574/72

Application of Article 94 of Regulation (EEC) No 574/72

The amounts to be refunded with regard to the benefits in kind provided in 2010 (2) to members of the family as referred to in Article 19(2) of Council Regulation (EEC) No 1408/71 (3) will be determined on the basis of the following average costs:

2

3

| | Annual | Net monthly |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Cyprus | EUR 831,23 | EUR 55,42 |

Annual

Net monthly

Cyprus

EUR 831,23

EUR 55,42

II.   Application of Article 95 of Regulation (EEC) No 574/72

Application of Article 95 of Regulation (EEC) No 574/72

The amounts to be refunded with regard to benefits in kind provided in 2010 (4) under Articles 28 and 28a of Regulation (EEC) No 1408/71 will be determined on the basis of the following average costs (only per capita from 2002):

4

| | Annual | Net monthly |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Cyprus | EUR 1 130,35 | EUR 75,35 |

Annual

Net monthly

Cyprus

EUR 1 130,35

EUR 75,35

---

(1)  OJ L 74, 27.3.1972, p. 1.

1

(2)  In relation to EU Member States, this amount applies with regard to the benefits in kind provided in the period between 1 January 2010 and 30 April 2010.

2

(3)  OJ L 149, 5.7.1971, p. 2.

3

(4)  See footnote 2.

4

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> UT
<LEGEND>
THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF INCOME, BALANCE SHEET, STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS AND
STATEMENT OF COMMON SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CIK> 0000028385
<NAME> DETROIT EDISON COMPANY
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<BOOK-VALUE>                                  PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                    8,500,667
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                    470,323
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                         756,649
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                     1,146,838
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              10,874,477
<COMMON>                                     1,451,199
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                      500,238
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                          1,391,104
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>               3,342,541
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                    144,405
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                         3,740,434
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                                   0
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                            0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                  10,001
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                  144,214
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                            0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                    115,742
<LEASES-CURRENT>                               144,499
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>               3,232,641
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>               10,874,477
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                    3,642,043
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                           226,567
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                   2,796,789
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                   3,023,356
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                        618,687
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                             (3,237)
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>                 615,450
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                       287,912
<NET-INCOME>                                   327,538
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                     16,015
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                  311,523
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                       319,263
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                      275,166
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                       1,086,049
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
No. 11407.

#### The W. A. Banks Company *v.*Stevens.

Decided December 14, 1909.

Error to Circuit Court of Cuyahoga county.

*Messrs. White, Johnson, McCqslin & Cannon,*for plaintiff in error.

*Messrs. Weed, Miller & Nason,*for defendant in error.

Judgment affirmed.

Crew, C. J., Summers, Spear, Davis and Shauck, JJ., concur.
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS



We consent to the incorporation by reference in (1) the Registration Statement
Number 33-25066 on Form S-8, dated October 21, 1988 and (2) we agree to the
incorporation by reference in the Resale Prospectus of our report, dated
September 4, 1998, on the consolidated financial statements of CutCo Industries,
Inc. and Subsidiaries appearing in the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the year
ended June 30, 1998.


                                              /s/ NUSSBAUM  YATES & WOLPOW, P.C.

                                                  NUSSBAUM  YATES & WOLPOW, P.C.

Melville, New York
October 7, 1998

87209
                                    - E-14 -

<PAGE>


               CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS



We consent to the incorporation by reference in (1) the Registration Statement
Number 33-25066 on Form S-8, dated October 21, 1988 and (2) we agree to the
incorporation by reference in the Resale Prospectus of our report, dated August
29, 1998, on the consolidated financial statements of CutCo Industries, Inc. and
Subsidiaries appearing in the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended
June 30, 1998.


/s/ GRANT THORNTON LLP

GRANT THORNTON LLP



Melville, New York
October 7, 1998
Mark E. McKinnon Mark.McKinnon@dentons.com

D 703.336.8708

Dentons US LLP

1676 International Drive • Penthouse

McLean, VA 22102

United States

T 703.336.8800

F 703.336.8750

Salans FMC SNR Denton

McKenna Long

dentons.com

November 4, 2015

U.S. Department of Transportation

Docket Management System

1200 New Jersey Ave., SE

Washington, D.C. 20590

Re: Delivery of Operating Documents (Docket No. FAA-2015-4947-0001)

To Whom it May Concern:

As you are aware, this office represents the University of Maine regarding the abovereferenced Petition for Exemption, in which the University of Maine seeks regulatory relief to 

allow commercial operation of small unmanned aircraft system. Please accept this letter as 

confirmation that the University of Maine operating documents were submitted electronically via email to 333exemptions@faa.gov. 

If you have any questions or require any additional information to process the University of 

Maine Petition, please do not hesitate to contact us. 

Very truly yours,

Mark E. McKinnon

Counsel for the University of Maine.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF SYSTEMS COMMUNICATIONS, INC. FOR THE FISCAL PERIOD
ENDED JUNE 30, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1
<CURRENCY>   US DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                         134,012
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   62,081
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (8,404)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               433,360
<PP&E>                                       1,060,045
<DEPRECIATION>                               (290,316)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,490,356
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        6,129,666
<BONDS>                                      3,350,017
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                  1,945,820
<COMMON>                                        11,184
<OTHER-SE>                                 (8,001,971)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,490,356
<SALES>                                      1,467,344
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,467,344
<CGS>                                           90,849
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                3,121,848
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                           (2,166,470)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             248,529
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                266,481
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            266,481
<DISCONTINUED>                                 563,011
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   829,492
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .08
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
##### 



Exhibit 10.14
 
 PERSONAL AND CONFIDENTIAL
  
    8.
    
    Except for (1) your termination of employment in connection with a Change in Control as
defined in the Employment Security Agreement referenced above, or (2) your termination of
employment by APAC for cause (defined as (i) gross misconduct or gross negligence in the
performance of your employment duties; (ii) willful disobedience by you of the lawful
directions received from the Company or from the person to whom you directly report or of
established policies of the Company; or (iii) commission by you of a crime involving fraud or
moral turpitude that can reasonably be expected to have an adverse effect on the business,
reputation or financial situation of the Company), or (3) your termination as a result of
your resignation from employment with the Company other than for Agreed Reason, and provided
you sign a then-current Waiver & Release Agreement, APAC will pay you severance equal to (x)
the monthly amount of your then-current Base Salary plus (y) the amount necessary to reimburse
you for payments you make in connection with your exercise of your rights under COBRA to
continue your and your dependants medical and dental benefits in accordance with the terms of
the Companys welfare plans as may be in effect from time to time during each of the following
twelve (12) months following such termination.




---



##### 



(1)
    
    without your written consent, (i) your duties and
responsibilities are materially reduced or diminished from those in effect on
your commencement of employment, or (ii) you no longer report to the Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, and instead are required to report to a
supervisor with materially diminished authority, duties or responsibilities
compared to that of the Chief Executive Officer of the Company, or(2)
    
    your base salary is reduced and not in accordance with a
compensation reduction applicable to all senior executives salaries generally,
or(3)
    
    any other material breach of the terms of the Letter or the
terms of your employment in general.




---



##### 



APAC CUSTOMER SERVICES, INC.
 ACCEPTED BY:/s/ JAMES MCCLENAHANJames McClenahan Date:
#### Lorn A. MAZEROLLE et al., Appellants, v. STATE of Florida DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION et al., Appellee.

No. O-471.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Sept. 14, 1972.

*365Warren Adrian Rachels, of William T. Basford, Jr. Law Offices, Jacksonville, for appellants.

William Lee Allen, Jacksonville, Geoffrey B. Dobson and Barbara Ann McPherson, Tallahassee, for appellee.

SPECTOR, Chief Judge.

Appellants seek reversal of a judgment in a condemnation action awarding them $760.00 for their property taken. At the trial on the question of value, testimony of appellants’ witness as to the legal description of the land to be taken was held inadmissible. Appellants assign that ruling as error. We agree.

The testimony of Charles Bassett, a registered land surveyor, was proffered to determine how much land was actually taken. He testified that the description in the order of taking read that the survey line could be on the southerly line of the right of way, but it appeared that they intended it to be on the center line of the right of way because the description stated that the property is 67 feet from the survey line, exclusive of existing road right of way. This is a particularly significant ambiguity since if the survey line is taken to be on the southerly right-of-way line, then there is an additional 3,350 square feet for which compensation would be due.

Section 73.071(3), Florida Statutes, F.S. A., provides that:

> “(3) The jury shall determine solely the amount of compensation to be paid, which compensation shall include:

> (a) The value of the property sought to be appropriated.”

Although appellee cites this statute as a basis for affirming the trial court’s decision, this court cannot see how a jury can set a valuation on property when they do not know how much property was actually taken. It is true that the sufficiency of the legal description would perhaps be more properly raised at the time of the order of taking, but that does not necessarily mean that the erroneous description cannot later be corrected in order to facilitate the jury’s function of setting proper compensation for property actually taken.

The exclusion of the evidence sought to be given by appellants’ witness concerning the apparent ambiguity as to the location and amount of land taken ef*366fectively interfered with the jury’s ability to arrive at a value verdict based upon appellants’ version of the facts had the jury elected to believe that version.

Accordingly, the judgment reviewed herein is reversed.

RAWLS and JOHNSON, JJ., concur.
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 3172

To amend the definition of rural community to expand eligibility for economic

recovery funds.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

SEPTEMBER 29, 1993

Mr. DEFAZIO (for himself, Mr. INSLEE, and Mr. SMITH of Oregon) introduced

the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Agriculture

A BILL

To amend the definition of rural community to expand

eligibility for economic recovery funds.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That section 2374(3) of the Food, Agriculture, Conserva4 tion, and Trade Act of 1990 (7 U.S.C. 6612 (3)) is

5 amended to read as follows:

6 ‘‘(3) The term ‘rural community’ means—

7 ‘‘(A) any town, township, municipality, or

8 other similar unit of general purpose local gov9 ernment, or any area represented by a not-for10 profit corporation or institution organized
2

HR 3172 IH

1 under state or federal law to promote broad

2 based development, or unit of general purpose

3 local government, as approved by the Secretary,

4 that has a population of not more than 10,000

5 individuals, is located within a county in which

6 at least 15 percent of the total primary and sec7 ondary labor and proprietor income is derived

8 from forestry, wood products, and forest related

9 industries such as recreation, forage production,

10 and tourism and that is located within the

11 boundary, or within 100 miles of the boundary,

12 of a national forest; or

13 ‘‘(B) any county that is not contained

14 within a Metropolitan Statistical Area as de15 fined by the United States Office of Manage16 ment and Budget, in which at least 15 percent

17 of the total primary and secondary labor and

18 proprietor income is derived from forestry, wood

19 products, and forest-related production, and

20 tourism and that is located within the bound21 ary, or within 100 miles of the boundary, of a

22 national forest.’’.

Æ