alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>


                                                                 EXHIBIT 11.1


                      DONALDSON, LUFKIN & JENRETTE, INC.
            SCHEDULE OF COMPUTATION OF WEIGHTED AVERAGE NUMBER OF
            COMMON SHARES AND COMMON SHARE EQUIVALENTS OUTSTANDING
  AND NET EARNINGS AND PRO FORMA NET EARNINGS PER SHARE FOR THE YEARS ENDED
                       DECEMBER 31, 1996, 1995 AND 1994
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>


                                                       Years Ended December 31,
                                                 1996        1995        1994
                                                 ----        ----        ----
                                                 (in thousands, except per share data)
<S>                                              <C>         <C>         <C>   
Weighted Average Common Shares:
 Average Common Shares Outstanding               53,300      50,570
 Average Restricted Stock Units Outstanding       5,152         894
 Average Common Shares Issuable Under
    Employee Benefit Plans                        1,466         193

 Pro forma weighted average common shares
  and common share equivalents used in
  calculating earnings per share                      -           -       51,475
                                                --------    -------      -------

Weighted Average Common Shares Outstanding       59,918      51,657
                                                ========    =======

Pro forma Weighted Average Common Shares
 Outstanding                                                              51,475
                                                                         =======
Earnings:
 Net Income                                    $291,300    $179,100     $123,000
 Less: Preferred Stock Dividend Requirement      18,653      19,868       20,970
                                               --------    --------     --------
Earnings Applicable to Common Shares           $272,647    $159,232     $102,030
                                               ========    ========     ========
Earnings Per Common Share                      $   4.55    $  3.08
                                               ========    ========

Pro forma Earnings Per Common Share                                     $   1.98
                                                                       ========= 
</TABLE>

                                        79
#### John Thomas TUCKER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 2321.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Fourth District.

Sept. 13, 1968.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Broward County; George W. Tedder, Jr., Judge.

Appeal quashed.
### Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h

Elizabeth A. Weave r

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathaway,

J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk July 26, 2010

s0719 

# Order

July 26, 2010

140276

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 140276 COA: 294275 Wayne CC: 05-003395 JOSEPH ALLEN PALMER, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application fo r leave to appeal the November 18, 2009 order of the Court of Appeals is consider ed, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
# C_2014070EN.01000101.xml

| 8.3.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 70/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.3.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 70/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.6974 — Metinvest/Lanebrook/Southern GOK)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2014/C 70/01

On 5 February 2014, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32014M6974. EUR-Lex is the online access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32014M6974. EUR-Lex is the online access to the European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 161 (Monday, August 20, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Page 42121]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-17869]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS EXAMINATION COUNCIL

[Docket No. AS18-09]


Appraisal Subcommittee; Notice of Meeting

AGENCY: Appraisal Subcommittee of the Federal Financial Institutions 
Examination Council.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In accordance with Section 1104(b) of Title 
XI of the Financial Institutions Reform, Recovery, and Enforcement Act 
of 1989, as amended, notice is hereby given that the Appraisal 
Subcommittee (ASC) will meet in open session for its regular meeting:
    Location: Federal Reserve Board--International Square location, 
1850 K Street NW, Washington, DC 20006.
    Date: August 29, 2018.
    Time: 10:00 a.m.
    Status: Open.

Reports

Chairman
Executive Director
Delegated State Compliance Reviews
Financial Report
Notation Votes

Action and Discussion Items

Open Session Minutes
    <bullet> April 23, 2018
    <bullet> May 9, 2018
    <bullet> June 8, 2018
Appraisal Foundation FY19 Grant Proposal
    <bullet> Foundation Grant for AQB and ASB
    <bullet> State Grant for State Investigator Training
FY19 ASC Budget Proposal
FY19-23 ASC Strategic Plan

How To Attend and Observe an ASC Meeting

    If you plan to attend the ASC Meeting in person, we ask that you 
send an email to <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#e8858d8d9c81868f9ba8899b8bc68f879e"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="b2dfd7d7c6dbdcd5c1f2d3c1d19cd5ddc4">[email protected]</span></a>. You may register until close of 
business four business days before the meeting date. You will be 
contacted by the Federal Reserve Law Enforcement Unit on security 
requirements. You will also be asked to provide a valid government-
issued ID before being admitted to the Meeting. The meeting space is 
intended to accommodate public attendees. However, if the space will 
not accommodate all requests, the ASC may refuse attendance on that 
reasonable basis. The use of any video or audio tape recording device, 
photographing device, or any other electronic or mechanical device 
designed for similar purposes is prohibited at ASC meetings.

    Dated: August 14, 2018.
James R. Park,
Executive Director.
[FR Doc. 2018-17869 Filed 8-17-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6700-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Exhibit 12.1

CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON (USA), INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES  Statements Re Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges  (Unaudited)  (In millions, except for ratio)

|                                                                 |                                                    | Year Ended December 31,
|---------------------------------------------------------------- | -------------------------------------------------- | -----------------------
|
|
|Earnings:                                                        |                                                    |                        
|                                                                 | Income (loss) before provision for income taxes(1) |                        
|Add: Fixed charges                                               |                                                    |                        
|                                                                 | Interest (gross)                                   |                        
|                                                                 | Interest factor in rents                           |                        
|                                                                 |                                                    |                        
|                                                                 |                                                    | Total fixed charges    
|Earnings before fixed charges and provision for income taxes (1) |                                                    | $                      
|                                                                 |                                                    |                        
|Ratio of earnings to fixed charges and preferred dividends       |                                                    |                        

---

---

QuickLinks
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                         193,797
<SECURITIES>                                    73,668
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 1,793
<PP&E>                                          34,432
<DEPRECIATION>                                  12,666
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 291,303
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            8,634
<BONDS>                                         10,500
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          1
<COMMON>                                           227
<OTHER-SE>                                     271,941
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   291,303
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 1,514
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   16,655
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (12,220)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (12,220)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (12,220)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.54)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.54)


</TABLE>
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04

- 18

- 00487

- CV

IN RE Samantha Renee VEGA

Original Mandamus Proceeding 1

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice Marialyn Barnard, Justice Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

Delivered and Filed: September 26, 2018

PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS DISMISSED AS MOOT

On July 17, 2018, r elator filed a petition for writ of mandamus and a motion for emergency

relief , which we denied . After considering the petition , rulings made by the trial court at a

subsequent hearing

, and briefing filed by relator after the hearing, this court concludes relator is

not entitled to the relief sought because the petition for writ of mandamus is moot . Accordingly,

the petition for writ of mandamu s is dismissed as moot

. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 52.8(a).

PER CURIAM

1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2018

- CI

- 12371, styled In the Matter of the Marriage of Christopher Post

and Samantha Ren e e Vega , pending in the 288th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas, the Honorable Norma Gonzales presiding.
#### WOLLARD AIRCRAFT EQUIPMENT, INC., a Washington corporation, Appellant, v. J. A. POSTELL et al., Appellees.

No. 72-476.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

June 30, 1972.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed.
#### M. G. CONLEY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 68-389.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Second District.

April 9, 1969.

Robert E. Jagger, Public Defender, and Joseph F. McDermott, Asst. Public Defender, Clearwater, for appellant.

Earl Faircloth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and William D.' Roth, Asst. Atty. Gen., Lakeland, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed on authority of Morgan v. State (Fla.App.2d 1962), 142 So.2d 308 and Rohdin v. State (Fla.App.2d 1958), 105 So.2d 371.

This case is clearly distinguishable from Specht v. Patterson (1967), 386 U.S. 605, 87 S.Ct. 1209, 18 L.Ed.2d 326, and Townsend v. Burke (1948), 334 U.S. 736, 68 S.Ct. 1252, 92 L.Ed. 1690; and our decision is wholly consonant with Williams v. New York (1949), 337 U.S. 241, 69 S.Ct. 1079, 93 L.Ed. 1337.

LILES, C. J., and PIERCE and Mc-NULTY, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 32.1
 Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
  1.
    
    the Report fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 2.
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 Date: May 16, 2011

/s/
Jeffrey WeaverJeffrey WeaverPresident and Chief Executive OfficerDate: May 16, 2011

/s/
Suzanne C. SallsSuzanne C. SallsSenior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 23.1



Consent of Independent Registered
Public Accounting Firm



We consent to the incorporation by
reference in the following Registration Statements:



| | (1) | Registration Statement No. 333-142424 on Form S-8 pertaining to Delta Air Lines, Inc. 2007 Performance
Compensation Plan,
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | Registration Statement No. 333-149308 on Form S-8 pertaining to Delta Air Lines, Inc. 2007 Performance
Compensation Plan,
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (3) | Registration Statement No. 333-154818 on Form S-8 pertaining to Delta Air Lines, Inc. 2007 Performance
Compensation Plan,
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (4) | Registration Statement No. 333-151060 on Form S-8 pertaining to Northwest Airlines Corporation
2007 Stock Incentive Plan,
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (5) | Registration Statement No. 333-212525 on Form S-8 pertaining to Delta Air Lines, Inc.
                                                               Performance Compensation Plan,
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (6) | Registration Statement No. 333-206258 on Form S-3 pertaining to Pass Through Certificates, and
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (7) | Registration Statement No. 333-209571 on Form S-3 pertaining to Common Stock;
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------



of our reports dated February 13,
2017, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of Delta Air Lines, Inc., and the effectiveness of internal control
over financial reporting of Delta Air Lines, Inc. included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) of Delta Air Lines, Inc. for the year
ended December 31, 2016.



/s/ Ernst & Young LLP



Atlanta, Georgia

February 13, 2017
#### Fred McMILLIAN, Petitioner, v. POWELL BROTHERS, INC. et al., Respondents.

No. 40179.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Nov. 30, 1970.

Certiorari denied.

ROBERTS, Acting C. J., and DREW, CARLTON, ADKINS and BOYD, JJ., concur.
254 La. 789

#### STATE of Louisiana v. Ronald LEE.

No. 50151.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Oct. 14, 1969.

In re: Ronald Lee applying for writ of habeas corpus.

Writ granted. The trial court is ordered to immediately hold a bail bond hearing for a determination of the correct bond upon a proper basis and one other than that shown in the return. See C.C.Pr. Article 317, and Louisiana v. Blanchard, 254 La. 644, 226 So.2d 336. See order.

HAMLIN, J.,

is of the opinion that, on the showing made, application should be denied.

It is Ordered that the Honorable Oliver P. Schulingkamp, Judge of Section F, Criminal District Court, Parish of Orleans, immediately hold a bail bond hearing for a determination of the correct bond upon a proper basis and one other than that shown in the return.
Methyl Bromide Inventory

16,422 MT

12,994 MT

9,974 MT

7,941 MT

6,458 MT

4,271 MT

3,064 MT

1,803 MT

0

2,000

4,000

6,000

8,000

10,000

12,000

14,000

16,000

18,000

2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010

Methyl Bromide (MT)

End of Year Inventory

Values are for the amount of inventory at the end of that year.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                             400
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                       39
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   466
<PP&E>                                              68
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     610
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              242
<BONDS>                                            161
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        13,467
<OTHER-SE>                                    (13,259)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       610
<SALES>                                            105
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   105
<CGS>                                               64
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      202
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  14
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (23)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               (23)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (23)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
#### Mrs. Agnes Ezell WEST v. TAYLOR HOTEL COURTS, INC.

No. 44259.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

Feb. 13, 1967.

William F. Riley, Natchez, E. P. Lobrano, Jr., Satterfield, Shell, Williams & Buford, Jackson, for appellant.

Joe W. Hobbs, Watkins & Eager, Jackson, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
<PAGE>

                                                                     Exhibit 5.1


                         [PALMER & DODGE LLP LETTERHEAD]



TELEPHONE: (617) 573-0100                             FACSIMILE: (617) 227-4420

                                 August 21, 2000

Tampa Electric Company
702 North Franklin Street
Tampa, Florida  33602

Ladies and Gentlemen:

         Reference is made to our opinion dated July 13, 1998 and included as
Exhibit 5.1 to the Registration Statement (the "Registration Statement") on Form
S-3 (File No. 333-55875) filed by Tampa Electric Company (the "Company"), a
Florida corporation, with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
"Commission") under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the "Securities
Act"). We are rendering this supplemental opinion in connection with the
prospectus supplement (the "Prospectus Supplement") dated August 16, 2000, filed
by the Company with the Commission pursuant to Rule 424 under the Securities
Act. The Prospectus Supplement relates to the offering by the Company of $150
million principal amount of REset Put Securities due 2015 (the "Notes"), which
Notes are covered by the Registration Statement. We understand that the Notes
are to be offered and sold in the manner described in the Prospectus Supplement.

         We have acted as your counsel in connection with the preparation of the
Registration Statement and the Prospectus Supplement. We are familiar with the
proceedings of the Board of Directors of the Company in connection with the
authorization, issuance and sale of the Notes. We have examined such other
documents as we consider necessary to render this opinion. We advise you that,
in our opinion, when the Notes have been duly executed and authenticated in

<PAGE>

August 21, 2000
Page 2

accordance with the Indenture relating to the Notes and issued and sold as
contemplated in the Prospectus Supplement, the Notes will constitute valid and
legally binding obligations of the Company, subject to bankruptcy, insolvency,
fraudulent transfer, reorganization, moratorium and similar laws of general
applicability relating to or affecting creditors' rights and to general equity
principles. We have relied as to certain matters on information obtained from
public officials, officers of the Company and other sources believed by us to be
responsible.

         The opinion rendered herein is limited to the laws of the Commonwealth
of Massachusetts and the federal laws of the United States. For purposes of our
opinion as to the enforceability of the Indenture and the Notes, we are
rendering such opinion as though the laws of Massachusetts governed,
notwithstanding the recitations in such instructions that the laws of another
jurisdiction may govern.

         We hereby consent to the filing of this opinion as part of the
Registration Statement and to the reference to our firm under the caption "Legal
Matters" in the Prospectus Supplement.

                                                     Very truly yours,

                                                     /s/ Palmer & Dodge LLP