alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>



                                                                   Exhibit 10.21

                             SIXTH AMENDMENT TO THE
                 BIRDS EYE FOODS MASTER SALARIED RETIREMENT PLAN

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

          This amendment is adopted by Birds Eye Foods, Inc., a corporation duly
formed and existing under and by virtue of the laws of the State of Delaware
(referred to herein as the "Employer").

                                   WITNESSETH

          WHEREAS, the Employer has adopted the Birds Eye Foods Master Salaried
Retirement Plan (the "Plan") which was amended and restated effective January 1,
2001, and

          WHEREAS, the Employer has reserved the right pursuant to Section 10.1
of the Plan to amend it at any time, and

          WHEREAS, the Employer now wishes to amend the Plan;

          NOW, THEREFORE, the Plan is hereby amended effective as of March 28,
2005 by revising Paragraph (f) of Section 6.1 to read as follows:

     "If any benefit payable under the Plan has a single-sum Actuarial
     Equivalent present value which is less than or equal to $5,000 or such
     other amount as provided in Code Section 411(a)(11), such payment shall be
     made in the form of an Actuarially Equivalent lump-sum basis without the
     Participant's consent; provided, however, that if the single-sum Actuarial
     Equivalent present value is greater than $1,000, then the lump-sum payment
     to the Participant or an eligible retirement plan designated by the
     Participant shall be made only if the Participant elects in writing on
     forms provided by the Plan Administrator for such payment or transfer to an
     eligible retirement plan. The Actuarial Equivalent present value shall be
     based on the benefit otherwise payable at the Participant's Normal
     Retirement Date but shall not be less than the value as of the commencement
     date in the case of a Participant who is eligible for an Early Retirement
     Benefit. A Participant who terminates employment at a time when he is not
     vested in any portion of his employer-provided benefits shall be deemed to
     have received a lump sum payment of his full accrued benefit attributable
     to his employer-provided benefit as of the date of termination."

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Amendment has been executed this 25 day of August,
2005.

                                           BIRDS EYE FOODS, INC.


                                           By: /s/ Lois Warlick-Jarvie
                                               ---------------------------------
                                           Title: Vice President Human Resources


                                        1
# C_2012152EN.01000101.xml

| 30.5.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 152/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.5.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 152/1

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

28 May 2012

2012/C 152/01

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,2566 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 99,75 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4303 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,8001 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 8,9982 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,2019 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 7,5359 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 25,309 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 298,38 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,698 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,3394 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,468 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,3074 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,274 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,2871 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 9,7542 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,6477 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,6038 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 483,09 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 10,461 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,956 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,5576 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 11 814,52 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 3,9495 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 54,662 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 40,116 |
| THB | Thai baht | 39,721 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 2,4826 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 17,517 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 69,345 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,2566

JPY

Japanese yen

99,75

DKK

Danish krone

7,4303

GBP

Pound sterling

0,8001

SEK

Swedish krona

8,9982

CHF

Swiss franc

1,2019

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

7,5359

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

25,309

HUF

Hungarian forint

298,38

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,698

PLN

Polish zloty

4,3394

RON

Romanian leu

4,468

TRY

Turkish lira

2,3074

AUD

Australian dollar

1,274

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,2871

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

9,7542

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,6477

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,6038

KRW

South Korean won

1 483,09

ZAR

South African rand

10,461

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,956

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,5576

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

11 814,52

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

3,9495

PHP

Philippine peso

54,662

RUB

Russian rouble

40,116

THB

Thai baht

39,721

BRL

Brazilian real

2,4826

MXN

Mexican peso

17,517

INR

Indian rupee

69,345

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1614 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1614

 To require Certificates of Citizenship and other Federal documents to 
reflect name and date of birth determinations made by a State court and 
                          for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 30, 2013

  Ms. Klobuchar (for herself, Mr. Blunt, Ms. Landrieu, Mr. Enzi, Mr. 
    Barrasso, Mr. Durbin, Mr. Vitter, and Mr. Rubio) introduced the 
 following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on 
                             the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To require Certificates of Citizenship and other Federal documents to 
reflect name and date of birth determinations made by a State court and 
                          for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Accuracy for Adoptees Act''.

SEC. 2. RECOGNITION OF STATE COURT DETERMINATIONS OF NAME AND BIRTH 
              DATE.

    Section 320 of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1431) 
is amended by adding at the end the following:
    ``(c) A Certificate of Citizenship or other Federal document issued 
or requested to be amended under this section shall reflect the child's 
name and date of birth as indicated on a State court order, birth 
certificate, certificate of foreign birth, certificate of birth abroad, 
or similar State vital records document issued by the child's State of 
residence in the United States after the child has been adopted or 
readopted in that State.''.
                                 <all>
```
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 07-7604
MELVIN B. COLEY, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. WARDEN, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Deborah K. Chasanow, District Judge. (8:07-cv-01073-DKC) Submitted: June 5, 2008 Decided: June 26, 2008 Before MICHAEL and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Melvin B. Coley, Appellant Pro Se. Phillip Michael Pickus, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.- 2 - PER CURIAM: Melvin B. Coley appeals the district court’s order granting the Appellee’s Fed. R. Civ. P. 56 motion for summary judgment on Coley’s 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) claim. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Coley v. Warden , No. 8:07-cv-01073-DKC (D. Md. Sep. 27, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Exhibit 23(a)

         Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The Board of Directors
Dataram Corporation:


We consent to incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (No.
33-56282) on Form S-8 of Dataram Corporation and subsidiaries of our reports
dated July 8, 2005, relating to the consolidated balance sheets of Dataram
Corporation and subsidiaries as of April 30, 2005 and 2004, and the related
consolidated statements of operations, stockholders' equity and comprehensive
income (loss), and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period
ended April 30, 2005, and the related financial statement schedule which
reports appear in the April 30, 2005 annual report on Form 10-K of Dataram
Corporation.





KPMG LLP

Short Hills, New Jersey
July 27, 2005
See T EX . R. A PP . P. 5 2
. 8 ( d ) ( “ W h e n d e n y i n g r e l i e f , t h e c o u r t m a y h a n d d o wn a n o p i n i o n b u t i s not 1 re q u i re d to d o s o .”); T EX . R. A PP . P
. 47
. 4 (di s t i ng ui s hi ng op i ni on s an d m em ora nd um op i ni on s ). 

### NU M BER 13- 08- 0050 7-C V 

## COURT OF A PP EA LS T H I R T E E N T H D I S T R I C T O F T E X AS CORPUS CHRI ST I -E DI NBURG

____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ IN RE CLYDE NUBINE

____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ On Petit ion fo r Writ of M an da mus .

____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ 

## ME MOR A N D U M OP I N I ON Be fo re Ju stice s R od rigu ez, Garza, a nd Ve la M emo rand um Opin ion Pe r Cu riam 1 Re la tor, C lyde Nubine, pro se, f iled a pet ition fo r w rit of ma nda mu s in the a b o ve caus es on Aug ust12, 2008. R ela tor req uest s t hisC our

t t o i ss u e a w ri t of mandamus orde ring Ann a Marie Silv as, th e District C lerk of Bee Cou nty, to f ile and p ro c e ss his ple adi ng s. W e con clude this Court doe s n ot have jurisdiction to grantt he requeste d relief . Th is cour t doe s no t h a ve m a ndamus jur is dicti on ov er di str ict c ler ks unl essi t i s s how n tha t

### 2

is suanc e of the w ri t i s n eces sar y to enforc e our

j ur is dicti on. SeeT EX . G OV ' T C OD E A NN . § 22.221( a) , ( b)( Ver non 200 4) ; In r e Si m pson , 9 9 7 S. W .2 d 9 3 9 (T e x. Ap p .–W a co 19 9 9 , o rig. proceed ing ); In r

e St rick hause n , 9 9 4 S. W .2 d 93 6 (T e x. Ap p .– Ho u st o n [1 stDist .] 19 9 9 , o rig. proceed ing ); In r

e C or onado , 9 8 0 S. W .2 d 69 1 , 6 9 2 (T e x. A p p .– Sa n An to n io 19 9 8 , o rig. proceed ing ); see als o In reHayes , N O. 13- 05- 454- CV , 200 5 T e x. App. LEX IS 5 706, *2 (Tex . Ap p.–C or pus Chr is ti 2005, or ig . proceed ing ). W hen a dis tr ict c ler k refuses to acce pt a ple adi ng present ed for fili ng , t he par ty present ing the documentca n s eek re li ef byfil ing an a ppl ic ati on for w ri t of manda mus i n the dis tr ict c our

t, or att empti ng to file the p lea din g di re ctl y w it h a d is tr ict j udg e, ex pla ini ng i n a v er ified moti on th at t he c ler k refused to ac ceptthe ple adi ng for fil ing
. See In re Berna rd , 9 9 3 S. W .2 d 45 3 , 4 5 4 -5 4 4 (T e x. Ap p .– Ho u st o n [1 stDist .] 19 9 9 , o r ig. pro ce e d in g) (O’Conno r, J., concu rring ). Relator has nei ther

al leg ed nor

sh ow n tha t i ss uance of the w ri t i s n eces sar y to enforc e our

j ur is dicti on. Acc ord in gly , t he pet it ion for w ri t of mandamus i s h ereby DI SM ISSE D for w ant o f jur is dicti on. SeeT EX . R. A PP . P
. 5 2
. 8 (a ). P e n d in g m o t io n s , if a n y, are l ik ew is e D ISM ISSE D for want o f jur is dicti on.
PERC UR IAM Me moran dum Opi nio n del ivered and filed thi s 2 7th d ay

of Aug ust , 200 8.
#### David EVANS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 70-735.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

June 23, 1971.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Palm Beach County; Joseph P. Metzger, Judge.

Appeal dismissed.
# C_2013153EN.01000101.xml

| 31.5.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 153/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

31.5.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 153/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.6818 — Deutsche Bahn/Veolia Transport Central Europe)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2013/C 153/01

On 30 April 2013, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32013M6818. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32013M6818. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.

---
```

[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 151 (Friday, August 5, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 47538-47539]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-19891]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMISSION ON CIVIL RIGHTS

Agenda and Notice of Public Meeting of the Nevada Advisory 
Committee

    Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of the rules and 
regulations of the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights (Commission) and the 
Federal Advisory Committee Act (FACA) that a planning meeting the 
Nevada Advisory Committee (Committee) to the Commission will be held on 
Monday, August 22, 2011 at the Department of Employment, Training and 
Rehabilitation, 2800 East St. Louis Ave., Las Vegas, Nevada 89104. The 
meeting is scheduled to begin at 10 a.m. and adjourn at approximately 
12 p.m. The purpose of the meeting is to discuss the Committee's report 
on the status of civil rights and discuss future activity.
    Members of the public are entitled to submit written comments. The 
comments must be received in the Western Regional Office of the 
Commission by September 22, 2011. The address is Western Regional 
Office, U.S. Commission on Civil Rights, 300 N. Los Angeles Street, 
Suite 2010, Los Angeles, CA 90012. Persons wishing to e-mail their 
comments, or to present their comments verbally at the meeting, or who 
desire additional information should contact Angelica Trevino, Office 
Manager, Western Regional Office, at (213) 894-3437, (or for hearing 
impaired TDD 913-551-1414), or by e-mail to atrevino@usccr.gov. 
Hearing-impaired persons who will attend the meeting and require the 
services of a sign language interpreter should contact the Regional 
Office at least ten (10) working days before the scheduled date of the 
meeting.
    Records generated from this meeting may be inspected and reproduced 
at the Western Regional Office, as they become available, both before 
and after the meeting. Persons interested in the work

[[Page 47539]]

of this advisory committee are advised to go to the Commission's Web 
site, http://www.usccr.gov, or to contact the Western Regional Office 
at the above e-mail or street address. The meeting will be conducted 
pursuant to the provisions of the rules and regulations of the 
Commission and FACA.

    Dated in Washington, DC on August 2, 2011.
Peter Minarik,
Acting Chief, Regional Programs Coordination Unit.
[FR Doc. 2011-19891 Filed 8-4-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6335-01-P
```
#### Michael Anthony WEEDO, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Nos. 70-1232, 70-1233.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Nov. 16, 1971.

Martin S. Saxon, Miami, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., and Barry Scott Richard, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appel-lee.

Before CHARLES CARROLL, HEN-DRY and BARKDULL, JJ.

*368PER CURIAM.

Defendant-appellee was convicted following a trial in which he was found guilty by a jury of unlawful possession of a stolen driver’s license (Case No. 69-3983). Defendant also entered a plea of guilty to a charge of unlawful possession of marijuana and was adjudicated guilty of such charge (Case No. 69-8893).

Defendant, in this consolidated appeal, seeks reversal on the grounds that the prosecuting attorney made certain remarks in the closing argument that were prejudicial to the defendant and that the court erred in denying defendant’s motion to change his plea of guilty to that of not guilty ,in case number 69-8893.

We have carefully considered these points in the light of the record on appeal and the briefs and have concluded that no harmful error has been made to appear. Therefore the convictions and sentences are affirmed.

Affirmed.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-7604

MELVIN B. COLEY,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

WARDEN,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Greenbelt. Deborah K. Chasanow, District Judge.

(8:07-cv-01073-DKC)

Submitted: June 5, 2008 Decided: June 26, 2008

Before MICHAEL and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Melvin B. Coley, Appellant Pro Se. Phillip Michael Pickus, OFFICE

OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Melvin B. Coley appeals the district court’s order

granting the Appellee’s Fed. R. Civ. P. 56 motion for summary

judgment on Coley’s 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) claim. We have

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we

affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Coley v.

Warden, No. 8:07-cv-01073-DKC (D. Md. Sep. 27, 2007). We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20460 

Cherilyn Moore 

Syngenta Crop Protection 

Regulatory Affairs 

PO Box 18300 

Greensboro, NC 27419-8300 

OFFICE OF CHEMICAL SAFETY 

AND POLLUTION PREVENTION 

November 5, 2014 

RE: EPA Review of Data Waiver Request for Primisulfuron-methyl GDCI-128973-1206 

Dear Ms. Moore: 

The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has completed its review of the waiver request for 

OSCPP Guideline 835.4400, anaerobic aquatic metabolism study for primisulfuron-methyl. This waiver 

request was submitted on February 11, 2014, with Syngenta's one-year progress report for the Data CallIn (DCI) referenced above. Please find a copy of the review attached for your files. 

The Agency has determined that the anaerobic aquatic metabolism study is no longer needed for 

the current registration review of primisulfuron-methyl; the information submitted by Syngenta is 

sufficient to inform the environmental fate and effects assessment. In the absence of this data, EPA will 

assume a 178 day anaerobic aquatic metabolism half-life for primisulfuron-methyl in the risk assessment 

conducted for registration review. Therefore, the Agency is hereby waiving the data requirements for 

Guideline 835.4400 in the aforementioned DCI. 

Please contact Christina Scheltema of my staff with any questions you may have. She can be 

reached by phone (703-308-2201) or email (scheltema.christina@epa.gov). 

Sincerely, 

Paai&IJ_~ 

Patricia Parrott, Chief . 

Risk Mitigation and Implementation Branch 3 

Pesticide Re-evaluation Division 

Enclosure: EPA Response to Waiver Requestfor an Anaerobic Aquatic Metabolism Study (GDLN 

835.4400) in Support of the Registration Review of Primisulfuron-Methyl. September 4, 2014. 

cc: Kahle "Bo" Davis, Registration Division
<Page>


                                                                      EXHIBIT 14

                              BIRDS EYE FOODS, INC.
                              CODE OF ETHICS POLICY

Birds Eye Foods, Inc. (the "Company") recognizes and believes in the importance
of transacting business ethically and with integrity. The employees of the
Company have important roles in creating and maintaining a corporate culture
within the Company that fosters honesty and high ethical standards, as well as
ensures accurate and transparent reporting of the Company's financial results
and conditions.

Accordingly, our employees are bound by the following Code of Ethics, and each
agrees that he or she will:

     o    Act with honesty, ethically and with integrity, avoiding actual or
          apparent conflicts of interest in personal and professional
          relationships.

     o    Respect the confidentiality of information acquired in the course of
          his or her work. Confidential information acquired in the course of
          his or her work will not be used or disclosed except as required for
          the performance of his or her job and except when he or she is either
          authorized or otherwise legally obligated to disclose such
          information.

     o    Provide information that is accurate, complete, objective, relevant,
          timely and understandable to ensure full, fair, accurate, timely and
          understandable disclosure in reports and documents that the Company
          files with, or submits to, government agencies, including the
          Securities and Exchange Commission, and in other public communications
          made by the Company.

     o    Conduct himself or herself so as to comply with all applicable laws,
          rules and regulations of federal, state, and local governments, and
          other appropriate private and public regulatory agencies.

     o    Promptly report to the Company's General Counsel and/or the Chairman
          of the Audit Committee any conduct that he or she believes to be a
          violation of any provision of this Officer Code of Ethics, including
          any transaction or relationship that reasonable could be expected to
          give rise to such a conflict.

Violations of this Code of Ethics, including failures to report potential
violations by others, will be viewed as a severe disciplinary matter that may
result in personnel action, including termination of employment.


Date:                                  Signature:
      ------------------------------              ------------------------------

It is a violation of the Company's Non-Retaliation Policy for Employees to
retaliate against any employee who in good faith reports any violation (s) of
this Principal Executive Officer/Financial Officer Code of Ethics.