alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
258 La. 246

#### Bluford E. UPTON v. MORRISON MERCHANDISING CORPORATION OF LOUISIANA.

No. 51250.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

March 29, 1971.

In re: Morrison Merchandising Corporation of Louisiana applying for certiorari or writ of review to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, Parish of Jefferson. 243 So.2d 349.

Writ denied. On the facts found by the Court of Appeal we can not say the result is incorrect.
#### Eugene RAIN, Appellant, v. Ivan H. SMITH et al., as copartners, d/b/a Reynolds, Smith and Hills, et al., Appellees.

No. R-273.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

March 6, 1973.

Rehearing Denied April 6, 1973.

William N. Long, of Lowry, Holden & Long, Gainesville, for appellant.

Marion R. Shepard, of Mathews, Osborne & Ehrlich, Jacksonville, for appel-lees.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed on authority of Waters v. Rockana Carriers, Inc., 171 So.2d 57 (Fla. App.1965), and May v. Allied Chlorine & Chemical Products, Inc., 168 So.2d 784 (Fla.App.1964).

SPECTOR, C. J., and WIGGINTON and JOHNSON, JJ., concur.
## 

EXHIBIT 15

September 8,
2000

Securities
and Exchange Commission
450 5th Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20549

Commissioners:

We
are aware that our report dated August 15, 2000, on our review of the interim consolidated financial information of Intimate Brands, Inc. and Subsidiaries (the
"Company") as of and for the period ended July 29, 2000 and included in the Company's quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter then ended is incorporated by reference in its
registration statement on Form S-3, Registration No. 333-78485, and the registration statements on Form S-8, Registration
Nos. 333-04921 and 333-04923.

Very
truly yours,

|/s/PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP |  | 
|----------------------------- |  | 
|PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP    |  | 

Columbus,
Ohio

---

## QuickLinks
OFFICE OF THE ATlORNMGENERAL OF TEXAS 

AUSTIN 

Honorable George II. Sheppard 

conptroller 03, PubUo A~oouatr 

~twbln, Texas. 

. 

Thfhe qusrrtfoa hns arisen ln.thle deyatmnt 

as to whether a witaelre traveling to euoh oourt 

or gand jury on a railway pass or ia. a sttte 

autor,obile would be entitled to thb three oents a 

per nLle aa lndloated la the above quoted seatiqn 

of Art101e 1030, C.C*P* 
,- - 

‘. .ll6 

Hooorablr Oeorfa Ii. Sheppard, pago 0 

, 

*In some lmtaaoea witnessoe are carrled 

to oourt by peaae offlaers or rtute patrolmen 

In atato owned auixcnobilesb Fould ouch wittie33 be ontltlod to hla thr?a oents n tila?n 

1 

. Prior to Its’ amendaent, SootIOn 1 Of Art1010 lo%, 

V.A.C.C.P., provided t&at such altnoasa 

“a . , ohall,.ba allOwed his actual travolin~ aznmees. not etoesdinr: 4 cmts gor 

ZiiTF~oia~. to and r:;turnin:: fro31 the oour5 

orrend jury, by thg naaroat practical coaVQ~MQO, and two dollars per dry for each 

dcy he “--?y necessarily bo aboont iron haze 

as a witness In such oaaa.W 

You cm respectfully ~dvlsod tkst it is the oyinion 

or this de~artmnt that auoh ~~ltnesses would bo entitled to 

thz% oorits Far mile .f,oln”, to and returnini: fro;? the oourt 

or @md jury by the nearest praotioal. cowsyar.as. ‘.%ethrr 

they truvelled 02 a railway ;ms, with seats officera, la 

jbte om~d auto?nobllss, or in their own sutonoblles would 

be Imatjerlal. 

However, we wish to >olnt out that State cmployoes 

oannot olals tr~vazing expsases fro?! the ztate and also 

frm the court ln stats oases+ See Subdivision U(a) OS 

saction 2 of tha Departmental Amroprlation Bill, 47th Logirlature or Tons, which roads as tollowr; 

“a, No traveling erponsoi shall be 

* olaixid, allowed, or pnld ualees Incurred while 

travelinir, on State business. My 9tete 

0rricid or saployee sntitlsd to traveiI0g 

~XPXNJ~S out of state appropriations herein 

made, who Is la~ally or oiiicially raquired 

to be preeant at the trial of any State 0880, 

shall not alctin; trovelln~ ox~onses fro?, the 

St&t& aid ulfio from the Court vjhersir. zld 

CRBO 5s :\sadlng. It by oYersi@t, duplioata 

cl~~lzs are fllud for said travollzq ox.p.sra 

and oolleoted, then naid offioors or 

e~gloyeoe s>&ll rel&buroe ani? refund to 

tho X-ate Treaauror an amount equal to thr 
c 

reapactive amount oolleotsd under such 

xitnoss iaer and mlleugr olalm.* 

WF x eaw 

:
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3044 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3044

             To prohibit retroactive income tax increases.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 9, 1993

  Ms. Schenk (for herself, Ms. Shepherd, Mr. Fingerhut, Mr. Deal, Ms. 
 Eshoo, Ms. Furse, Mrs. Clayton, Mr. Klink, and Mr. McHale) introduced 
  the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and 
                                 Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
             To prohibit retroactive income tax increases.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Ban on Retroactive Taxes Act''.

SEC. 2. PROHIBITION OF RETROACTIVE INCOME TAX INCREASES.

    No provision of law increasing individual income tax rates or 
corporate income tax rates may apply to taxable years beginning before 
the date of the enactment of such law.

                                 <all>
```
262 La. 128

#### STATE of Louisiana ex rel. Albert PARR v. C. Murray HENDERSON, Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary, et al.

No. 52501.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

May 30, 1972.

In re: Albert Parr applying for remedial writs and writ of habeas corpus.

Application denied. Inasmuch as the State informs us that this matter is fixed for hearing on June 1, 1972, the application is moot.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.6


              CONSENT OF PERSON NAMED AS ABOUT TO BECOME A DIRECTOR


         Pursuant to Rule 438 promulgated under the Securities Act of 1933, as
amended, I, George W. Davis, hereby consent to be named as a person about to
become a director of WCB Holding Corp. in this registration statement on Form
S-4.

                                                           /s/ George W. Davis
                                                           ---------------------
                                                           George W. Davis
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 157 (Tuesday, August 14, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Page 40269]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-17436]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY


Electricity Advisory Committee

AGENCY: Office of Electricity, Department of Energy.

ACTION: Notice of renewal.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Pursuant to the Federal Advisory Committee Act, and in 
accordance with Title 41 of the Code of Federal Regulations, and 
following consultation with the Committee Management Secretariat, 
General Services Administration, notice is hereby given that the 
Electricity Advisory Committee's (EAC) charter has been renewed for a 
two-year period beginning on August 8, 2018.
    The Committee will provide advice and recommendations to the 
Assistant Secretary for Electricity on programs to modernize the 
Nation's electric power system.
    Additionally, the renewal of the EAC has been determined to be 
essential to conduct Department of Energy business and to be in the 
public interest in connection with the performance of duties imposed 
upon the Department of Energy by law and agreement. The Committee will 
continue to operate in accordance with the provisions of the Federal 
Advisory Committee Act, adhering to the rules and regulations in 
implementation of that Act.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Matt Rosenbaum, Designated Federal 
Officer at (202) 586-1060.

    Issued at Washington, DC, on August 8, 2018.
Wayne D. Smith,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 2018-17436 Filed 8-13-18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450-01-P
WATER QUALITY CONTROL PLAN 

FOR THE SAN DIEGO BASIN (9)

SEPTEMBER 8, 1994 

(with amendments effective on or before April 4, 2011) 

CALIFORNIA REGIONAL WATER QUALITY CONTROL BOARD 

SAN DIEGO REGION
WATER QUALITY CONTROL PLAN 

FOR THE SAN DIEGO BASIN (9)

Adopted by the 

California Regional Water Quality Control Board 

San Diego Region 

on September 8, 1994 

Approved by the 

State Water Resources Control Board 

on December 13, 1994 

and the 

Office of Administrative Law 

on April 26, 1995 

(with amendments effective on or before April 4, 2011) 

Cover Design by Sharon Norton, State Water Resources Control Board 

Cover Photographs clockwise from top left corner: 

San Diego Marine Life Refuge (2004) by D. Gregorio 

San Mateo Creek Steelhead (1999) by L. Pardy 

Kelp at La Jolla Shores (2006) by L. Pardy 

San Diego Bay by SWRCB 

Cold Creek Falls (1995) by J. Smith 

September 8, 1994 edition prepared by 

David T. Barker, P.E., Senior Water Resource Control Engineer 

Kristin K. Schwall P.E., Water Resources Control Engineer D

Linda L. Pardy, Environmental Scientist
STATE OF CALIFORNIA

EDMUND G. BROWN JR., Governor 

MATTHEW RODRIQUEZ, Agency Secretary, California Environmental Protection Agency 

State Water Resources Control Board 

Charles R. Hoppin, Chair Water Quality 

Frances Spivy-Weber, Vice Chair Public 

Tam M. Doduc Civil Engineer 

Steven Moore Sanitary Engineer 

Felicia Marcus Attorney 

Thomas Howard, Executive Director 

1001 I St., Sacramento, CA 95814 

Phone (916) 341-5254 

http://www.waterboards.ca.gov/ 

California Regional Water Quality Control Board 

San Diego Region

Grant Destache, Chair

Gary Strawn, Vice Chair

Eric Anderson 

George Loveland 

Henry Abarbanel 

Tomas Morales 

Vacant 

David W. Gibson, Executive Officer

James G. Smith, Assistant Executive Officer 

9174 Sky Park Court, Suite 100 

San Diego, CA 92123-4340 

Phone (858) 467-2952 

Fax (858) 571-6972 

http://www.waterboards.ca.gov/sandiego/
<PAGE>

                                                                       EXHIBIT 5

[LETTERHEAD OF GRAY CARY WARE & FREIDENRICH LLP]
400 Hamilton Avenue, Palo Alto, CA  94301-1825
Phone:  650-328-6561       Fax:  650-327-3699        www.gcwf.com

September 18, 2000

Securities and Exchange Commission
450 Fifth Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C.  20549

Ladies and Gentlemen:

As legal counsel for Tab Products Co., a Delaware corporation (the "Company"),
we are rendering this opinion in connection with the registration under the
Securities Act of 1933, as amended, of up to 800,000 shares of the Common Stock,
$0.01 par value, of the Company which may be issued pursuant to the Tab Products
Co. Tax Deferred Savings Plan (the "Plan").

We have examined all instruments, documents and records which we deemed relevant
and necessary for the basis of our opinion hereinafter expressed. In such
examination, we have assumed the genuineness of all signatures and the
authenticity of all documents submitted to us as originals and the conformity to
the originals of all documents submitted to us as copies. We are admitted to
practice only in the State of California and we express no opinion concerning
any law other than the law of the State of California, the corporation laws of
the State of Delaware and the federal law of the United States. As to matters of
Delaware corporation law, we have based our opinion solely upon our examination
of such laws and the rules and regulations of the authorities administering such
laws, all as reported in standard, unofficial compilations. We have not obtained
opinions of counsel licensed to practice in jurisdictions other than the State
of California.

Based on such examination, we are of the opinion that the 800,000 shares of
Common Stock which may be issued upon exercise of options and purchase rights
granted under the Plan are duly authorized shares of the Company's Common Stock,
and, when issued against receipt of the consideration therefor in accordance
with the provisions of the Plan, will be validly issued, fully paid and
nonassessable. We hereby consent to the filing of this opinion as an exhibit to
the Registration Statement referred to above and the use of our name wherever it
appears in said Registration Statement.

Respectfully submitted,

     /s/ Gray Cary Ware & Freidenrich LLP

GRAY CARY WARE & FREIDENRICH LLP
Order entered June 17, 2021

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-19-00385-CV

KIMBERLY D. HOGAN, Appellant

V.

ASPIRE FINANCIAL, INC., D/B/A ASPIRE LENDING, Appellee

On Appeal from the 162nd Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DC-18-01806

ORDER

Appellant Kimberly D. Hogan’s June 7, 2021 motion to correct the record/ 

docket is DENIED.

/s/ CRAIG SMITH

JUSTICE
# C_2013257EN.01001001.xml

| 6.9.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 257/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.9.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 257/10

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.6977 — OMERS/AIMCO/VUE)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2013/C 257/03

On 25 July 2013, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32013M6977. EUR-Lex is the online access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32013M6977. EUR-Lex is the online access to the European law.

---
Exhibit 31(b)
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a)
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
      a)
    
    designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is
made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this annual report is being prepared;b)
    
    [reserved]
 c)
    
    evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report
based on such evaluation; and
 d)
    
    disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter
(the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of the annual report) that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants
internal control over financial reporting.
  a)
    
    all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely
affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; and
 b)
    
    any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting.
  /s/ James J. OConnorJames J. OConnorChief Financial Officer, Treasurer and
Secretary
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3177 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3177

        To suspend until January 1, 1997, the duty on levodopa.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 29, 1993

   Ms. Margolies-Mezvinsky introduced the following bill; which was 
              referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
        To suspend until January 1, 1997, the duty on levodopa.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SUSPENSION OF DUTY ON LEVODOPA.

    Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of 
the United States is amended by inserting in numerical sequence the 
following new heading:

      

``  9902.31.12  3-hydroxy-L-tyrosine                       No change        No change        On or before 12/   
                 (provided for in                                                             31/96           ''
                 subheading 2922.50.25).  Free                                                                . 

SEC. 2. EFFECTIVE DATE.

    The amendment made by section 1 applies with respect to goods 
entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after the 
15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.

                                 <all>
```
# C_2013077EN.01001701.xml

| 15.3.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 77/17 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.3.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 77/17

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

14 March 2013

2013/C 77/04

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,2937 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 124,79 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4575 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,86570 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 8,3784 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,2347 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 7,5320 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 25,615 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 305,30 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,7013 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,1549 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,3981 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,3456 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,2495 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,3279 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 10,0370 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,5811 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,6193 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 438,38 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 11,9594 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 8,0415 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,5846 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 12 553,58 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,0246 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 52,574 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 39,8412 |
| THB | Thai baht | 38,358 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 2,5460 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 16,0628 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 70,3340 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,2937

JPY

Japanese yen

124,79

DKK

Danish krone

7,4575

GBP

Pound sterling

0,86570

SEK

Swedish krona

8,3784

CHF

Swiss franc

1,2347

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

7,5320

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

25,615

HUF

Hungarian forint

305,30

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,7013

PLN

Polish zloty

4,1549

RON

Romanian leu

4,3981

TRY

Turkish lira

2,3456

AUD

Australian dollar

1,2495

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,3279

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

10,0370

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,5811

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,6193

KRW

South Korean won

1 438,38

ZAR

South African rand

11,9594

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

8,0415

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,5846

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

12 553,58

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,0246

PHP

Philippine peso

52,574

RUB

Russian rouble

39,8412

THB

Thai baht

38,358

BRL

Brazilian real

2,5460

MXN

Mexican peso

16,0628

INR

Indian rupee

70,3340

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report of SL Green Operating Partnership, L.P.(the “Company”) on Form 10-Q as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Marc Holliday, Chief ExecutiveOfficer of SL Green Realty Corp., the sole general partner of the Company,hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

1.                                       The Reportfully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), asapplicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.                                       The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
|               | /s/  Marc Holliday                 |   |
|--------------------|------------------------------------|--------|
| Name:              | Marc  Holliday                     |
| Title:             | Chief  Executive Officer           |
|               | of  SL Green Realty Corp., the     |
|               | general  partner of the registrant |
|               |                               |
| November  12, 2010 |

 

----
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-14-00348-CV

Justin Vacek, Appellant

v.

Paula Vacek, Appellee

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF COMAL COUNTY, 433RD JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NO. C2010-1360D, HONORABLE DIB WALDRIP, JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Appellant Justin Vacek filed his notice of appeal on May 30, 2014. That day, we

notified Vacek that he was required to make a written request and arrangements to pay for the clerk’s

record and the reporter’s record within ten days from his receipt of our letter. The clerk’s record

from the trial court was due to be filed in this Court on July 28.

On August 19, this Court notified Vacek that no clerk’s record had been filed due to

his failure to pay or make arrangements to pay the fee for preparing the clerk’s record. The Court’s

notice requested that Vacek make arrangements for the clerk’s record and submit a status report

regarding this appeal by August 29. In addition, the notice informed Vacek that his appeal was

subject to dismissal if he did not comply with our instructions. To date, Vacek has not filed a status

report or otherwise responded to this Court’s notice, and the clerk’s record has not been filed.

If the trial court’s clerk fails to file the clerk’s record due to appellant’s failure to pay

or make arrangements to pay for the clerk’s fee for preparing the record, the appellate court may
dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution unless the appellant was entitled to proceed without

payment of costs. Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(b). In this case, Vacek has not established that he is entitled

to proceed without payment of costs, see Tex. R. App. P. 20.1 (providing procedure for establishing

indigence on appeal), and he has failed to pay or make arrangements to pay the clerk’s fee for

preparing the clerk’s record. We therefore dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See Tex. R.

App. P. 42.3(b).

__________________________________________

David Puryear, Justice

Before Justices Puryear, Pemberton, and Field

Dismissed for Want of Prosecution

Filed: November 21, 2014

2