alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 156 (Monday, August 13, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Page 40081]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-17331]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

 Geological Survey

[GX18DK00GUF0200]


Notice of Renewal of the Advisory Committee on Water Information

AGENCY: United States Geological Survey.

ACTION: Notice of renewal of the Advisory Committee on Water 
Information Charter.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

    Following consultation with the General Services Administration, 
notice is hereby given that the Secretary of the Interior is renewing 
the Advisory Committee on Water Information (ACWI).
    The ACWI has been established under the authority of the Office of 
Management and Budget and Budget Memorandum No. M-92-01 and the Federal 
Advisory Committee Act. The purpose of this Presidential Committee is 
to represent the interests of water-information users and professionals 
in advising the Federal Government on Federal water-information 
programs and their effectiveness in meeting the Nation's water-
information needs. Member organizations help to foster communications 
between the Federal and non-Federal sectors on sharing water 
information.
    Membership represents a wide range of water resources interests and 
functions. Representation on the ACWI includes all levels of 
government, academia, private industry, and professional and technical 
societies. Member organizations designate their representatives and 
alternates. Membership is limited to a maximum of 35 organizations.
    The Committee will function solely as an advisory body, and in 
compliance with the provisions of the Federal Advisory Committee Act. 
The Charter will be filed under the Act, 15 days from the date of 
publication of this notice.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Adrienne Bartlewitz, Acting ACWI 
Executive Secretary, U.S. Geological Survey, 12201 Sunrise Valley 
Drive, MS 436, Reston, VA 20192. Telephone: 703-648-4304; Fax: 703-648-
5002.

    Dated: June 29, 2018.
Ryan Zinke,
Secretary of the Interior.
[FR Doc. 2018-17331 Filed 8-10-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4338-11-P
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3021 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3021

     To prohibit the admission to the United States as refugees of 
  individuals who have served in the armed forces of Iraq during the 
                         Persian Gulf conflict.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 8, 1993

 Mr. Gallegly introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
     To prohibit the admission to the United States as refugees of 
  individuals who have served in the armed forces of Iraq during the 
                         Persian Gulf conflict.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PROHIBITION OF ADMISSION TO THE UNITED STATES AS REFUGEES OF 
              INDIVIDUALS WHO HAVE SERVED IN THE ARMED FORCES OF IRAQ 
              DURING THE PERSIAN GULF CONFLICT.

    (a) In General.--Notwithstanding any other provision of law, 
individuals who have served in the armed forces of Iraq during the 
Persian Gulf conflict may not be admitted to the United States as 
refugees under the Immigration and Nationality Act.
    (b) Persian Gulf Conflict Defined.--For purposes of this section, 
the term ``Persian Gulf conflict'' means the period beginning on August 
2, 1990, and ending on February 27, 1991.

                                 <all>
```
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Byron WADE.

No. 62404.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

June 30, 1978.

In re: Byron Wade applying for Writ of Habeas Corpus. Parish of Carroll.

Motion denied.
#### Human LEFSHETZ, Petitioner, v. FLORIDA INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION and Miami Springs Villas, Inc., Respondents.

No. 67-269.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Third District.

July 17, 1967.

Rehearing Denied Aug. 16, 1967.

PER CURIAM.

Certiorari denied.
#### John P. WAKEMAN, Mary R. Wakeman, Jane W. Wakeman, Wakeman Family Trusts A., B., C. and D., individually and as partners doing business as Wakeman Construction Company, and National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, Pa., a corporation, Appellants, v. CITY OF DEERFIELD BEACH, Florida, for the use and benefit of Infilco, Division of Fuller Company, a corporation, Appellee.

No. 70-424.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Oct. 28, 1970.

Rehearing Denied Jan. 28, 1971.

C. Robert Burns, Burns, Middleton, Rogers, Farrell & Faust, Palm Beach, for appellants.

Mark Maurer, Maurer, Maurer & Maurer, and Cecil T. Farrington, Fort Lauder-dale, for appellee infilco.

*796PER CURIAM.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the record on appeal and heard oral argument. On the basis thereof, it is the conclusion of this court that the appellants have failed to make error appear. Accordingly, the judgment from which the present appeal has been taken is affirmed.

Affirmed.

CROSS, C. J., and McCAIN and REED, JJ., concur.
#### SOUTH FLORIDA ELECTRIC COMPANY, Inc., a Florida corporation, et al., Appellants, v. UNITED BONDING INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellee.

No. 70-1269.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Feb. 10, 1971.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA DA 23-0150 PAMELA JO POLEJEWSKI,

Plaintiffand Appellant, v. CASCADE COUNTY, JOHN and JANE DOE,

Defendants and Appellees. ORDER

On November 28, 2023, we issued an Opinion in the above-entitled action, affirmingthe District Court'sdismissal ofPolejewski's lawsuit against Cascade County on issue preclusion grounds, and declaring Polejewski a vexatious litigant. Polejewski v. Cascade Cty., 2023 MT 230N. Polejewski timely filed a petition for rehearing. M. R.App. P. 20(1)(a)provides that a petition for rehearingwill be considered only when theCourt "overlooked some fact material tothe decision,"when "it overlooked some question presented by counsel that would have proven decisive to the case," or when "its decision conflicts with a statute or controlling decision not addressed" by the Court. Having fully considered Polejewski's petition, we conclude that rehearing is not warranted under the standards ofM. R. App. P. 20(1)(a). Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the petition for rehearing is DENIED. The Clerk ofCourt is directed to mail copies ofthis Order to Pamela Jo Polejewski and all counsel ofrecord.

` r> DATED this day ofJanuary, 2024.


## r 'k 

### JAN 0 9 27:if ChiefJustice Bowen GreenwoodJrt 01/09/2024

Case Number: DA 23-0150

# 9eP-A;-&-MciWp
Summary	of	Interagency	Working	Comments	on	Draft	Language	under									

E.O.	13563	and	12866	Interagency	Review.		Subject	to	Further	Policy	Review.

9Comments on U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Proposed Rule, “Control of Air Pollution from 

Motor Vehicles: Tier 3 Motor Vehicle Emission and Fuel Standards,” RIN 2060-AQ86

V.F.6.a. Gasoline Used in Military Applications

In our diesel fuel program, we provided an exemption for diesel fuel used in tactical 

military vehicles and nonroad engines and equipment with a national security exemption (NSE) 

from the vehicle and engine emissions standards. Due to national security considerations, some 

of EPA’s existing regulations allow the military to request and receive NSEs for vehicles, 

engines, and equipment from emissions regulations if the operational requirements for such 

vehicles, engines, or equipment warrant such an exemption. Fuel used in these applications 

would also be exempt if it is used in tactical military vehicles, engines, or equipment that are not 

covered by an NSE but, for national security reasons (such as the need to be ready for immediate 

deployment overseas), these applications need to be fueled on the same fuel as those with an 

NSE. We are proposing this exemption under the proposed Tier 3 gasoline program.
# C_2018420EN.01000801.xml

| 20.11.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 420/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.11.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 420/8

---

Corrigendum to notice concerning the anti-dumping measures in force in respect of imports into the Union of ceramic tableware and kitchenware originating in the People’s Republic of China: change of the names of companies subject to the anti-dumping rate for cooperating non-sampled companies

(
  Official Journal of the European Union OJ C 414 of 20 November 2014
  )

(2018/C 420/05)

On page 9, in the table, in the second column of the third row:

for:

‘Guangdong Jinqiuangyi Ceramics Co., Ltd.’,

read:

read:

‘Guangdong Jinqiangyi Ceramics Co., Ltd.’.

---
#### STATE of Florida, by and through Reubin O’D. Askew, Governor, and Robert L. Shevin, Attorney General, and State of Florida Department of Pollution Control, Petitioners, v. CITIES SERVICE COMPANY, a corporation authorized to do business in Florida, Respondent.

No. 72-516.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Oct. 5, 1972.

Certiorari dismissed.
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

**SECTION1350 CERTIFICATION**

In connection with the AnnualReport on Form 10-K/A of Veritas DGC Inc. (the “Company”) for the year endedJuly 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the datehereof (the “Report”), I, Thierry Pilenko, Chief Executive Officer of theCompany, certify, pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 6 of Title 18 of theUnited States Code, that:

1.               The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934;

2.               The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

November 28, 2006
| /s/ THIERRY PILENKO     |   |
|-------------------------|--------|
| Thierry Pilenko         |
| Chief Executive Officer |

 

This certification is furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed to be a part of the Reportor “filed” for any purpose whatsoever.

----
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-6636

BALDWIN NEIL FOSTER, Plaintiff - Appellant, and SYBIL FOSTER, Plaintiff, versus IDA WARREN, Attorney, Defendant - Appellee.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. James C. Cacheris, Senior District Judge. (CA-98-284-AM) Submitted: October 8, 1998 Decided: October 26, 1998 Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Baldwin Neil Foster, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Baldwin Neil Foster appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 1998) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Foster v. Warren , No. CA-98-284-AM (E.D. Va. Apr. 2, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
* Pursuan t to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

____________________ No. 99-10070

____________________ In The Matter Of: ALLIANCE HEALTH OF FORT WORTH INC, Debtor, INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE, Appellee,

v. CHERRY STREET PARTNERS, LP, Appellant.

_________________________________________________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas

(4:98-CV-691-A)

_________________________________________________________________ November 3, 1999 Before KING, Chief Judge, and REYNALDO G. GARZA and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: *
AFFIRMED. See 5 TH C IR . R. 47.6.
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 3220

To amend the Public Health Service Act with respect to increasing the

number of health professionals who practice in the United States in

a field of primary health care.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

OCTOBER 5, 1993

Mr. TRAFICANT introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Energy and Commerce

A BILL

To amend the Public Health Service Act with respect to

increasing the number of health professionals who practice in the United States in a field of primary health

care.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Health Professions

5 Education Availability Act of 1993’’.
2

•HR 3220 IH

1 SEC. 2. ESTABLISHMENT IN CERTAIN HEALTH PROFES2 SIONS EDUCATION PROGRAMS OF REQUIRE3 MENTS REGARDING PRIMARY HEALTH CARE

4 AND ADMISSION OF DOMESTIC APPLICANTS.

5 Section 791 of the Public Health Service Act (42

6 U.S.C. 295j), as added by section 102 of Public Law 102–

7 408 (106 Stat. 1994), is amended—

8 (1) by redesignating subsections (b) and (c) as

9 subsections (c) and (d), respectively; and

10 (2) by inserting after subsection (a) the follow11 ing subsection:

12 ‘‘(b) CERTAIN REQUIREMENTS FOR SCHOOLS.—

13 ‘‘(1) PRIMARY HEALTH CARE.—The Secretary

14 may make an award of a grant or contract under

15 this title to a health professions school only if the

16 school agrees that the school will, in accordance with

17 such criteria as the Secretary may establish, carry

18 out a program—

19 ‘‘(A) to emphasize training in primary

20 health care; and

21 ‘‘(B) to encourage the students of the

22 school to enter a field of primary health care as

23 a career choice.

24 ‘‘(2) DOMESTIC APPLICANTS.—

25 ‘‘(A) The Secretary may make an award of

26 a grant or contract under this title to a health
3

•HR 3220 IH

1 professions school only if the school agrees that,

2 in considering applications for admission to the

3 programs of health professions education oper4 ated by the school, the school will admit an in5 dividual who is not a citizen or permanent resi6 dent alien of the United States only if no quali7 fied applicant who is such a citizen or alien is

8 seeking admission.

9 ‘‘(B) For purposes of subparagraph (A),

10 the term ‘program of health professions edu11 cation’ includes medical residency training pro12 grams and other postgraduate programs in

13 health professions education.’’.

14 SEC. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE.

15 This Act takes effect October 1, 1993, or upon the

16 date of the enactment of this Act, whichever occurs later.

Æ
# In the United States Court of Federal Claims

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

No. 17-809V Filed: January 30, 2018

UNPUBLISHED

TERESA FOWLER,

Petitioner,

v.

SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES,

Respondent. Special Processing Unit (SPU); Ruling on Entitlement; Concession; Table Injury; Influenza (Flu) Vaccine; Shoulder Injury Related to Vaccine Administration (SIRVA)

Ronald Craig Homer, C onway, Homer, P.C., Bost on, MA, for petitioner. Justine Elizabeth Walters, U.S. Department of Justice, Wa shington, DC, for respondent.

RULING ON ENTITLEMENT 1

Dorsey , Chief Special Master:

On June 15, 2017, petitioner filed a petit ion for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq.

, 2 (the “Vaccine Act”). Petitioner alleges that she suffer ed from a shoulder injury related to vaccine administration (“SIRVA”) following an influenz a (“flu”) vaccination administered on October 20, 2014. Petition at 1. The case was assigned to the Sp ecial Processing Unit of the Office of Special Masters.

On January 29, 2018, respondent filed his Ru le 4(c) report in which he concedes that petitioner is entitled to compensation in this case. Respondent’s Rule 4(c) Report

at 1. Specifically, respondent concluded that pet itioner’s claim meets the criteria for a SIRVA, and that petitioner is entitled to a presumption of causation Id. at 6.

1 Because this unpublished ruling contains a reaso ned explanation for the action in this case, the undersigned intends to post it on the United States Cour t of Federal Claims' website, in accordance with
the E-Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic Government Services). In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact medical or other inform ation, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, t he undersigned agrees that the identified material fits within this definition, the undersigned will redact such material from public access.

2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for ease of citation, all “§” references to the Vaccine Ac t will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. § 300aa (2012).Respondent further agrees that , in light of the information contained in the record, entitlement to compensati on is appropriate under the terms of the Vaccine Act. Id. at 6-

7.

In view of respondent’s positio n and the evidence of record, the undersigned finds that petitioner is entitled to compensation.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/Nora Beth Dorsey Nora Beth Dorsey Chief Special Master
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 

RESEARCH TRIANGLE PARK, NC 27711 

APR 2 3 2012 OFFICE OF 

AIR QUALITY PLANNING 

AND STANDARDS 

MEMORANDUM 

SUBJECT: 

FROM: 

TO: 

Second Extension of Comment Period for 1Oth Conference on Air Quality 

Modeling 

J£. -Ov,' Q... ·, - · . • <:::::::> George M Bridgers, Model Clearinghouse Director C!J'7) '~ 

Air Quality Modeling Group, C439-01 

Docket#: EPA-HQ-OAR-2012-0056 

On April 2, 2012, an "Extension of Comment Period for 1Oth Conference on Air Quality 

Modeling" memorandum was posted on the 1Oth Conference on Air Quality Modeling 

(Modeling Conference) informational website and also in the official Docket (EPA-HQ-OAR20 12-0056) for the Conference. In this memorandum, the public comment period for the 

Conference was extended from April 16 to April 30 to allow additional time for commenters to 

assemble and provide their comments, recommendations, and feedback. 

When the April 2, 2012 memorandum was submitted to the Docket, it was anticipated 

that two model assessment and evaluation reports announced prior to the Modeling Conference 

would be available by early April for review and comment. There have been unforeseen delays 

that have prevented the delivery of these reports. It is now anticipated that these reports will be 

posted to Modeling Conference's informational website by no later than May 15, 2012. 

In response to the delays of the two model assessment and evaluation reports and 

additional requests for further extension of the public comment period, we are extending the 

comment period again. With the submission of this second memorandum to the Docket, the 

comment period for the 1Oth Conference on Air Quality Modeling is herby extended to June 15, 

2012. All comments should be submitted to the Docket by the close of business on June 15 and 

per the instructions that were provided in the original Federal Register publication. 

We apologize for any inconvenience that the two extensions of the comment period may 

have caused. If there are any questions regarding this comment period extension, please contact 

George Bridgers ofEPA's Air Quality Modeling Group at (919) 541-5563 or 

bridgers.george@epa. gov. 

Recycled/Recyclable • Printed wtth Vegetable Oil Based Inks on 100% Recycled Paper (40% Postconsumer)
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

Supreme Court No. DA 19-0648

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

ANDREW PIERCE LAKE,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Pursuant to authority granted under Mont. R. App. P. 26(1), the Appellant is 

given an extension of time until October 14, 2020 to prepare, file and serve the 

Appellant’s opening brief.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

September 14 2020

09/14/2020

Case Number: DA 19-0648
# C_2014005EN.01000201.xml

| 9.1.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 5/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.1.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 5/2

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.7003 — DLG/Team)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2014/C 5/02

On 3 January 2014, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32014M7003. EUR-Lex is the online access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32014M7003. EUR-Lex is the online access to the European law.

---