2 . 3 0 0 2 . 4 0 0 2 . 5 0 0 2 . 6 0 0 2 . 7 0 0 2 . 8 0 0 2 . 9 0 0 3 . 0 0 0 3 . 1 0 0 3 . 2 0 0 3 . 3 0 0 3 . 4 0 0 3 . 5 0 0 3 . 6 0 0 3 . 7 0 0 3 . 8 0 0 3 . 9 0 0 4 . 0 0 0 1 20 0 . 0 584 0 . 0 1 30 0 . 0 584 0 . 0 1 40 0 . 0 584 0 . 0 1 00 0 0 1 50 0 0 2 00 0 0 50 0 0 1 32 8 . 0 580 0 . 0 1 32 8 . 0 5 90 0 . 0 5 00 0 1 00 0 0 1 50 0 0 2 00 0 0 2 . 3 0 0 2 . 4 0 0 2 . 5 0 0 2 . 6 0 0 2 . 7 0 0 2 . 8 0 0 2 . 9 0 0 3 . 0 0 0 3 . 1 0 0 3 . 2 0 0 3 . 3 0 0 3 . 4 0 0 3 . 5 0 0 3 . 6 0 0 3 . 7 0 0 3 . 8 0 0 3 . 9 0 0 4 . 0 0 0TWO-WAYTRAVELTIME (SEC)TWO-WAYTRAVELTIME (SEC) 

## PROPOSED

WELLSITE MC692-C NORTH SOUTH WEST EAST Filename: 122152b_ill_MC692-C-2.cdr Project No. 1012-2152b



## INLINE 1328 

# Illustration MC692-C-2. Portions of Inline 1328 and Crossline 5840 Showing Conditions Beneath Proposed Wellsite MC692-C CROSSLINE 5840 HORIZON 30 SEAFLOOR

HORIZON 40

RELA TIVE AMPLITUDE

Peak Trough RELA TIVE AMPLITUDE

Peak Trough 

## PROPOSED WELLSITE MC692-C

HORIZON 10 HORIZON 20

T OP OF SAL T CHANNEL CHANNEL L in e : T ra ce : Horizontal Distance (ft): 

## MC 691 MC

692 MC 693 MC 692 MC 648

“MC GREEN UNIT” “MC BLUE UNIT”

LIMITOF INVESTIGA

TION

### 1 30 0 . 0 5 84 0 . 0 1 40 0 . 0 584 0 . 0 1 00 0 0 1 50 0 0 2 . 3 0 0 2 . 4 0 0 2 . 5 0 0 2 . 6 0 0 2 . 7 0 0 2 . 8 0 0 2 . 9 0 0 3 . 0 0 0 3 . 1 0 0 3 . 2 0 0 3 . 3 0 0 3 . 4 0 0 3 . 5 0 0 3 . 6 0 0 3 . 7 0 0 3 . 8 0 0 3 . 9 0 0 4 . 0 0 0 50 0 0 Line: Trace: W A TER FLOW AND GAS POTENTIAL 

### Shallow Water Flow and Gas Potential HIGH 0 1 2 3 0 = NEGLIGIBLE 1 = LOW 2 = MODERA

TE 3 = HIGH NEGLIGIBLE 

### Horizon Lithology/Stratigraphy



# Illustration MC692C-3. T ophole Prognosis Chart, Proposed Wellsite MC692-C, Mississippi Canyon Block 692 Potential Drilling Constraints Filename: 22152_ill_MC692-C-3.cdr Project No. 1012-2152b

W ater Flow Gas 3-D Seismic Section Through Proposed Wellsite MC692-C X = 1,196,237 FT; Y

= 10,275,252 FT Crossline 5840 at Inline 1328 

## N S Horizon TWT (sec, bsl) Depth (ft, bml) Depth (ft, bsl)



## CROSSLINE 5840TWO-WAYTIMETRAVEL(SEC) SEAFLOOR HORIZON 10 HORIZON 20 2.415 2.472 2.556

4.000 159 394

4,893 -5,917 -6,076 -6,31 1

-10,810 

### PROPOSED WELLSITE MC692-C

HORIZON 30 2.681 749 -6,666 Distance (ft): Horizontal

Interbedded turbidite and mass-transport deposits. Sediments will likely consist of alternating sands, silts, and clays. Moderate potential for overpressured sands. Low potential for shallow gas.

HORIZON 40 3.339 2,719 -8,636 MC 692 MC 698

The seafloor dips to the southeast at about 0.2°. There is a negligible potential for high-density deepwater benthic communities within 2,000 ft of the surface location.

Low potential for shallow water flow and shallow gas. Channel, mass-transport, and turbidite deposits. Sediments likely consist of clays, silts, and possible thin sand seams. Well-layered clays and silts. “MC Blue Unit”- Moderate potential for overpressured sands. Low potential for shallow gas. Low potential for shallow water flow. Negligible potential for shallow gas. Negligible potential for shallow water flow and shallow gas.

LIMIT OF INVESTIGA

TION INTERF ACE INTERF ACE -7,390 2.929 1,473

-8,268 2,351 3.220

RELA TIVE AMPLITUDE

Peak Trough F AUL T 3.968

-10,700 4,783 

### CHANNEL UNIT 1 Unit UNIT 2 UNIT 3 UNIT 4

UNIT 5 Interbedded slope-fan and mass-transport deposits. Sediments are likely alternating sands, silts, and clays. “Green Unit”- Moderate potential for overpressured sands. Low potential for shallow gas. Low potential for shallow water flow and shallow gas. Clay-rich mass-transport and turbidite deposits. Sediments likely consist of clays, silts, and possible thin sand seams. Stratified clays and silts interlayered with thin, mud-rich turbidite and mass-transport deposits. Thin sand seams are possible within the turbidites. Mass-transport deposits. Sediments are likely clays and silts with possible discontinuous sand seams.