alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
U.S. flag
              An official website of the United States government





---

close


Spain
 Basic Facts Population
 People per sq. km
 Males per 100 females
 Children per woman
 Goods exported from U.S.
 Goods imported to U.S.
 Change in exports from U.S. for 2013 to 2022
 A Closer Look Source
 Comparisons
 Compared to the U.S.
 Compared to the World
 K = Thousands
				M = Millions
				B = Billions
  Merchandise Trade U.S. Trade in Manufactured Goods
 Top Exported Goods by U.S. State or Territory
 Population Current and Projected Population
 Population by Age and Sex
 Source and Notes Source: U.S. Census Bureau, International Database (demographic data) and USA Trade Online (trade data); Central Intelligence Agency, The World Fact Book (country reference maps). This application presents data for 228 countries and areas of the world with a 2024 population of 5,000 or more. For eleven of those countries and areas, only demographic data are presented. "Data not available" indicates that data are not available from this application.  In such instances, data may be available elsewhere at the census.gov website. Trade figures presented for France do not include data for overseas departments French Guiana, Guadeloupe, Martinique, Mayotte, and Reunion but do include data for dependencies Saint Barthelemy and Saint Martin.  Trade figures for the United Kingdom include data for crown dependencies Guernsey, Isle of Man, and Jersey. To learn more about world population projections, go to Notes on the World Population Clock. To learn more about international trade data, go to Guide to Foreign Trade Statistics. All trade figures are in U.S. dollars on a nominal basis.


CONNECT WITH US
 Information Quality
                    Data Linkage Infrastructure
                    Data Protection and Privacy Policy
                    Accessibility      
                    FOIA
                    Inspector General
                    No FEAR Act
                    U.S. Department of Commerce
                    USA.gov
  Measuring America's People, Places, and Economy
EXHIBIT 99.2




                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of LumaLite  Holdings,  Inc. on Form 10-KSB
for the period  ending  December  31,  2002,  as filed with the  Securities  and
Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I, Hank Schumer,  Chief
Financial Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, that, to
the best of my knowledge and belief:

         (1)      the Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      the information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in
                  all material respects,  the financial  condition and result of
                  operations of the Company.



 /s/  Hank Schumer
Hank Schumer
Chief Financial Officer
March 19, 2003
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM CONSOLIDATED BALANCE
SHEET AND CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF INCOME AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                          27,259
<SECURITIES>                                     8,452
<RECEIVABLES>                                    6,678
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (706)
<INVENTORY>                                        220
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                43,629
<PP&E>                                           9,080
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (4,216)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  57,323
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           12,638
<BONDS>                                            852
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            93
<OTHER-SE>                                      43,685
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    57,323
<SALES>                                         16,742
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                27,369
<CGS>                                              785
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    1,842
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                23,967
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  85
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  3,704
<INCOME-TAX>                                       251
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              3,453
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     3,453
<EPS-BASIC>                                       1.29
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.48


</TABLE>
**Exhibit      32.1**

**CERTIFICATIONS      PURSUANT TO **

**SECTION      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

**(18      U.S.C. SECTION 1350)**

|                                  |                                                 |                                    |
|---------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------|
|                                  |                                                      |
| Date:              September 11, 2006 | By:                                        | /s/ L.              Michael Cutrer |
|                                  | L.                Michael Cutrer                     |
|                                  | President                and Chief Executive Officer |
|                                  |                                                                                           |                                                 |
|---------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------|
|                                  |                                                                                                |
| Date:              September 11, 2006 | By:                                                                                  | /s/              James W. Klingler    |
|                                  | James                W. Klingler                                                               |
|                                  | Senior                Vice President and Chief                Financial                Officer |

----
### C o ^^^^-^p^'-vi^ViT C Adams , Kevi n (OST) From : Rober t Stanfor d Islan d Ai r[stanford@alaska.com ] Sent : Tuesday , Apri l 06 , 201 0 3:3 7 P M To : Adams , Kevi n (OST) Subject : Islan d Ai ressentia l bi d Karlu k ; : ' Kevi n Adam s Essentia l Ai r

Servic e Divisio n Offic e o f Aviatio n Analysi s U.S
. Departmen t

o f Transportatio n 120 0 Ne w Jerse y Avenue , S E Washington , D C 2059 0 Re : Essentia l Ai r

Servic e at

Karluk , A K

Docke t 2004-1934 2 I n regard s t o th e lette r

o f Servan t Ai r date dMarc h 18 , 201 0 Islan dAi r woul dlik e t o offer

th e followin g comments . 1
. Servan t

Air' s Proposa l t o offer

servic e t o Karlu k

Alask aunsubsidized , an dafter bi d close r wherei n n o bi dwa s originall y place dseem s t o b e irresponsibl e an dno t i n th e bes t interes t o f th e villag e o f

Karluk
. Furthermor e i n thei r proposa l the y see mt o foreshado w thei r

intention s t o agai n discontinu e Karlu k service
. I n thei r

bi do f 1 -1 1 - 201 0 Mr
. Cratty state s (Servan t Ai r retain s it s righ t t o reduc e service o n 90-days notic

e i f th e servic e situatio n a t Akhio k an dKarlu k changes. ) I t

i s clear t o thi s carrie r

the y hav e n o intentio n o f

maintainin g unsubsidize dservic e an dar e onl y forcin g are-bi dof th e curren t contracts . 2
. Servan t

Ai r ha s file dfor

ane w servic e t o Larse n Ba y Alask awith thei r curren t flee t of singl e engin e aircraf

t t o begi n Apri l 2 , 2010
. I t seem s confusin g tha t

if yo u hav e th e aircraf t t o begi n thi s servic e tha t yo u wouldn' t

hav e th e ability t o complet e th e las t 1 1 minute s o f

flyin g t o th e unsubsidize ddestination
. Onc e agai n thi s show s thei r tru e intentions
. Th e las t tim e Servan t

Ai r wa s awarde dth e Karlu k essentia l servic e contrac t Islan dAi r wa s extende dan drequire dt o cove r for Servan t Air' s suppose dinabilit y t o begi n service
. Thi s i s nothin g mor e tha n adela y tacti c i n orde r t o no t hav e t o operat e i n th e mor e difficul t

winte r months
. Especiall y no w that thei r bi dguarantee s afinancia l loss ! W e fee l that

i f continua l servic e ha s no t bee n initiate dwithi n 6 0 day s o f thei r recen t acciden t (Marc h 15 , 2010 ) tha t

Servan t Ai r shoul db e disqualifie dfor Karluk , Alaska
. A t presen t th e Departmen t

ha s no t issue dan y writte n orde r extendin g Islan dAi r

for Karlu k Optio n On e o r

Two i n it s mor e recen t

bi dproposals
. A s Islan dAi r i scontinuin g t o fly a n Essentia l Servic e schedul e int o th e villag e o f Karlu k w e reques t

a t thi s tim e tha t

an orde r b e issue ds o a s t o appl y ou r curren t billing
. Rober t G Stanfor d Islan dAi r 907-539-118 2 Smile4all7@comcast.ne t Stanfor d@ alaska.co m
Exhibit 32.1

















CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. Section 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In connection with the Quarterly Report of Auscrete Corporation (the “Company’) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2012 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date here of (the “report”), I, John Sprovieri, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1.
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.
The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated this 14th day of November, 2012.








/s/John Sprovieri/s/John SprovieriChief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
# C_2012079EN.01000302.xml

| 17.3.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 79/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.3.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 79/3

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.6499 — FCC/Mitsui Renewable Energy/FCC Energia)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2012/C 79/03

On 12 March 2012, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32012M6499. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32012M6499. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.

---
#### Janie Brown et al., Appellants, v New York City Housing Authority, Respondent.

[735 NYS2d 766]

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Marilyn Shafer, J.), entered October 18, 2000, which granted defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Defendant made a prima facie showing that it provided ade*263quate supervision of the infant plaintiff and, based upon the infant’s own testimony, it is uncontradicted that the accident was due to the unanticipated intervention of another camper who suddenly tripped the infant plaintiff in the course of play *(see, Mirand v City of New York,*84 NY2d 44, 49-50). Concur— Mazzarelli, J.P., Rosenberger, Ellerin, Wallach and Marlow, JJ.
#### W. C. McDUFFIE et al., Petitioners, v. L. P. HILL, and his wife, Virginia Hill, Respondents.

No. 36349.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Oct. 18, 1967.

Rehearing Denied Nov. 14,1967.

Brannon, Brown, Norris, Vocelle & Haley, Lake City, for petitioners.

*326Gordon P. Blitch, Jacksonville, for respondents.

PER CURIAM.

The Petition for Writ of Certiorari, Fla. App., 196 So.2d 790, reflected probable jurisdiction in this Court. We issued the Writ and have heard argument of the parties. After argument and upon further consideration of the matter, we have determined that the Writ was improvidently issued. Therefore, the Writ is hereby discharged and the Petition for Writ of Cer-tiorari dismissed.

It is so Ordered.

CALDWELL, C. J., DREW and THOR-NAL, JJ., and WHITE, Circuit Judge (Retired), concur.

ERVIN, J., concurs specially with Opinion.

ERVIN, Justice

(concurring specially with opinion):

I concur in the decision to discharge the writ. While I believe that the owners of the adjacent soil on Alligator Lake because of its size and the history of its use have rights similar to riparian owners to contin-uancy of the lake in its natural condition, it does not appear from its determination of the present facts of this case that the District Court’s decision conflicts with other appellate decisions. It found that the Respondents’ dike and well were designed to protect their pasture lands lying landward of the lake’s high water mark and do not unduly interfere with the common rights of other owners adjacent to the lake. I do not perceive the decision of the District Court to have such finality as to preclude subsequent relief if it is later demonstrated in a proper case that the rights and lands of other adjacent owners are interfered with in the common use and enjoyment of the lake.
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 315 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 315

  To limit medicare denials by peer review organizations of medically 
                 necessary inpatient hospital services.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 5, 1993

 Mr. Quillen introduced the following bill; which was referred jointly 
      to the Committees on Ways and Means and Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To limit medicare denials by peer review organizations of medically 
                 necessary inpatient hospital services.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. LIMITATION ON MEDICARE DENIAL OF MEDICALLY NECESSARY 
              INPATIENT HOSPITAL SERVICES.

    (a) In General.--Notwithstanding any provision of the medicare 
program to the contrary, except as provided in subsection (b), payment 
may not be denied by the Secretary or a PRO under the medicare program 
with respect to inpatient hospital services on the basis that the 
services were not reasonable and medically necessary (or not allowable 
under subsection (a)(1) or (a)(9) of section 1862 of the Social 
Security Act) if a physician has made the certification required under 
section 1814(a)(3) of such Act with respect to the services.
    (b) Exception.--Subsection (a) shall not apply to inpatient 
hospital services ordered by a physician whom the Secretary or PRO has 
determined (after notice and opportunity for a hearing) has a clear 
pattern of certifying as reasonable and medically necessary inpatient 
hospital services that are not reasonable and medically necessary.
    (c) Definitions.--In this section:
            (1) The term ``medicare program'' refers to the programs 
        under title XVIII of the Social Security Act, and includes the 
        peer review program established under part B of title XI of 
        such Act.
            (2) The term ``PRO'' refers to a utilization and quality 
        control peer review organization which has a contract under 
        part B of title XI of the Social Security Act.
            (3) The term ``Secretary'' means the Secretary of Health 
        and Human Services.

                                 <all>
```
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-6941

PHILLIP ANTHONY DAYE,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

B. J. BARNES, Sheriff; WILLARDEAN DULA,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle

District of North Carolina, at Durham. William L. Osteen, District

Judge. (CA-01-94-1)

Submitted: September 5, 2002 Decided: September 11, 2002

Before MOTZ, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Phillip Anthony Daye, Appellant Pro Se. Susan D. Moore, COUNTY

ATTORNEY’S OFFICE, Greensboro, North Carolina; Perry Cleveland

Henson, Sr., Amanda Mary Willis, HENSON & HENSON, L.L.P.,

Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Phillip Anthony Daye appeals the district court’s order

denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 2002)

complaint under 28 U.S.C.A. § 1915A (West Supp. 2002). We have

reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion accepting the

magistrate judge’s recommendation and find that this appeal is

frivolous. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of

the district court. Daye v. Barnes, No. CA-01-94-1 (M.D.N.C. May

29, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before

the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
#### Marva WATSON, Appellant, v. John WATSON, Appellee.

No. 71-881.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Jan. 25, 1972.

Appeal from Circuit Court, St. Lucie County; D. C. Smith, Judge.

Appeal dismissed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF GT BICYCLES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES AS OF AND FOR THE
NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1996 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FORM 10-Q FOR SEPTEMBER 30, 1996.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                           1,071
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   41,660
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (1,618)
<INVENTORY>                                     66,257
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               110,549
<PP&E>                                           8,020
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (3,219)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 137,301
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           21,581
<BONDS>                                         60,932
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            10
<OTHER-SE>                                      54,778
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    54,788
<SALES>                                        145,399
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               145,399
<CGS>                                          104,272
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  104,272
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                26,519
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,514
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 12,094
<INCOME-TAX>                                     4,039
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              8,055
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     8,055
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.81
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.81
        

</TABLE>