alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Ray Agins, Landlord, Respondent, *v.*Herbert Aronowitz, Tenant, and Joseph D. McGoldrick, as State Rent Administrator, Intervener, Appellant.

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Department,

May 21, 1953.

*Emory Gardiner*and *Robert H. Schaffer*for appellant.

*Samuel Turchin*for respondent.

*Per Curiam.*

The State Rent Administrator may intervene in a proceeding of this kind (State Residential Rent Law, § 11, subd. 4, as amd. by L. 1951, ch. 443, § 1; *Matter of Sbeglia*v. *McGoldrick,*N. Y. L. J. Oct. 17,1952, p. 851, col. 1). The moving affidavit discloses that on the date of trial the landlord was aware but did not apprise the court of the fact that the Rent *251Administrator had rejected as invalid and not made in good faith the lease purporting to increase the maximum rent. Accordingly, in the interests of substantial justice, the motion for a new trial should have been granted *(Nugent*v. *Metropolitan St. Ry. Co.,*46 App. Div. 105; N. Y. City Mun. Ct. Code, § 6, subd. 7; *Di Caprio v. Di Grazia,*N. Y. L. J., March 27,1953, p. 1033, col. 1).

The order should be unanimously reversed upon the law and the facts, without costs and motion in all respects granted.

Walsh, Murphy and Ughetta, JJ., concur.

Order reversed, etc.
Order entered April 16 , 2021

In The 

### Court of Appeals **Fifth District of Texas at Dallas**

No. 05

- 21

- 00194

- CV

IN RE SCOTT FRENKEL , Relator

O riginal Proceeding from the 296th Judicial Distric t Court Co llin County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 296

- 03470

- 2016

O RDER Before Justices Molberg, Reichek, and Smith
Before the Court are relator ’ s (1) March 29, 2021 motion to seal the petition
for writ of mandamus ; ( 2) March 29, 2021 motion to consider and seal t he in

camera s upplemental record , and (3) April 14, 2021 motion to sea l the in camera supplement al record

. R elator states that the petition ’ s appendix and supplemental
record contain documents that were filed under seal in the trial court , and he ask s
this Court to main tain the petition and supplement al record under seal. The trial

court ’ s March 1, 2021 sealing order, however, does not meet the re quirements of
Rule 76a

. See T EX

. R. C IV

. P. 7 6a (setting forth the re quirements for sealing court records)

.We w ill TEMPORARILY SEAL t he petition for writ of mandam us and supplemental record pending further order of th is Court . The parties have

T WENTY D AYS from the date of this order to provide a proper Rule 76a order
from th e trial court permitting the filing of th e document s under seal and to supplement the mandamus record with a copy of that order. Failure to do so will
result in t he denial of the motion, unless, within that time frame, the parties submit
brief ing establishing a valid legal basis on which we may m aintain the document s
under seal withou t an order sealing the document s in the trial court.
Also bef ore the C o urt is relator ’ s March 31, 2021 second emergency motion for temporary relief

. Based on relator ’ s April 13, 2021 letter advising us that the
trial court has now granted his requested relief , we DENY the second emergency
motion as moot.

/s/ AMANDA L. REICHEK JUSTICE
# C_2013357EN.01000801.xml

| 6.12.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 357/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.12.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 357/8

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

5 December 2013

2013/C 357/05

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,3594 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 138,73 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4596 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,83130 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 8,8631 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,2262 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,4035 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 27,450 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 301,83 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,7028 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,1894 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,4660 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,7784 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,5038 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4487 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 10,5407 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,6565 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,7044 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 441,59 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 14,2302 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 8,2811 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,6400 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 16 245,79 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,3883 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 59,641 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 44,8932 |
| THB | Thai baht | 43,881 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 3,2225 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 17,7086 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 83,8650 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,3594

JPY

Japanese yen

138,73

DKK

Danish krone

7,4596

GBP

Pound sterling

0,83130

SEK

Swedish krona

8,8631

CHF

Swiss franc

1,2262

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,4035

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

27,450

HUF

Hungarian forint

301,83

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,7028

PLN

Polish zloty

4,1894

RON

Romanian leu

4,4660

TRY

Turkish lira

2,7784

AUD

Australian dollar

1,5038

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4487

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

10,5407

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,6565

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,7044

KRW

South Korean won

1 441,59

ZAR

South African rand

14,2302

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

8,2811

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,6400

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

16 245,79

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,3883

PHP

Philippine peso

59,641

RUB

Russian rouble

44,8932

THB

Thai baht

43,881

BRL

Brazilian real

3,2225

MXN

Mexican peso

17,7086

INR

Indian rupee

83,8650

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
#### Newt V. MILLS v. Jerry A. ADAMS.

No. 62409.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

June 30, 1978.

In re: Newt V. Mills applying for certio-rari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Second Circuit. Parish of Jackson. 352 So.2d 287.

Writ granted.

It is ordered that the writ of review issue; that the Court of Appeal send up the record in duplicate of the case; and that counsel for plaintiff and defendant be notified.
U.S. flag
              An official website of the United States government





---

close


Haiti
 Basic Facts Population
 People per sq. km
 Males per 100 females
 Children per woman
 Goods exported from U.S.
 Goods imported to U.S.
 Change in exports from U.S. for 2013 to 2022
 A Closer Look Source
 Comparisons
 Compared to the U.S.
 Compared to the World
 K = Thousands
				M = Millions
				B = Billions
  Merchandise Trade U.S. Trade in Manufactured Goods
 Top Exported Goods by U.S. State or Territory
 Population Current and Projected Population
 Population by Age and Sex
 Source and Notes Source: U.S. Census Bureau, International Database (demographic data) and USA Trade Online (trade data); Central Intelligence Agency, The World Fact Book (country reference maps). This application presents data for 228 countries and areas of the world with a 2024 population of 5,000 or more. For eleven of those countries and areas, only demographic data are presented. "Data not available" indicates that data are not available from this application.  In such instances, data may be available elsewhere at the census.gov website. Trade figures presented for France do not include data for overseas departments French Guiana, Guadeloupe, Martinique, Mayotte, and Reunion but do include data for dependencies Saint Barthelemy and Saint Martin.  Trade figures for the United Kingdom include data for crown dependencies Guernsey, Isle of Man, and Jersey. To learn more about world population projections, go to Notes on the World Population Clock. To learn more about international trade data, go to Guide to Foreign Trade Statistics. All trade figures are in U.S. dollars on a nominal basis.


CONNECT WITH US
 Information Quality
                    Data Linkage Infrastructure
                    Data Protection and Privacy Policy
                    Accessibility      
                    FOIA
                    Inspector General
                    No FEAR Act
                    U.S. Department of Commerce
                    USA.gov
  Measuring America's People, Places, and Economy
II0(a)(2 re4Uireri,eh-o 1ttlé’A

InfrsJctre

2) enorb

j áIIfloIr*InI5JetI1tñt

ent air uIlty sa ads, (NMQS)fr tHose

at autl,otity tb

cCept1hg 6tiifl1nton, ônfastctsTr slons

The kis 1ibn drtM,j

the J4-hotTi

n atiduIte n(Pf45) N, whichtbPAØrom.i1gared rnSe,ber 1 snd proØsed SIP 1ieSnd supplerrients soüi1IWies 2001 Plan which

rqulreMt aive-tth

wa[ PM2S NAAQls1bJfr, I ..

át156S:SStrèet:

Interested pat(es may Ubmlt llrTlénts in Writ ing on these poposedSIP révislons prior the pUblic heariri; dd either aAy or hi Writfh atth UbIlj1eflng’ f. u are Unable

jhto ubmIt your comments in advance4te r11C FieaHng please addre yourcommito

Air uai1ahagementSudn k

‘

HNOflCEWXLL AWEAR

0, C

0

C

C,, I

00

-t

Cl 0

NOTICE OFPUBLIC

‘reViSIonto meet thënfrstruure.

AirA

$&rce

(p0

(p

(p

00

-I0

-t0

(D)

C?,

I

Q-)

CPj3 4
# C_2012377EN.01000701.xml

| 7.12.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 377/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.12.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 377/7

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

6 December 2012

2012/C 377/04

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,3072 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 107,66 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4592 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,81135 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 8,6294 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,2114 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 7,3360 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 25,195 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 283,48 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,6963 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,1340 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,5418 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,3388 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,2456 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,2961 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 10,1308 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,5693 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,5936 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 417,21 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 11,4205 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 8,1439 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,5320 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 12 591,79 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 3,9845 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 53,525 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 40,3332 |
| THB | Thai baht | 40,079 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 2,7199 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 16,8684 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 70,7690 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,3072

JPY

Japanese yen

107,66

DKK

Danish krone

7,4592

GBP

Pound sterling

0,81135

SEK

Swedish krona

8,6294

CHF

Swiss franc

1,2114

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

7,3360

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

25,195

HUF

Hungarian forint

283,48

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,6963

PLN

Polish zloty

4,1340

RON

Romanian leu

4,5418

TRY

Turkish lira

2,3388

AUD

Australian dollar

1,2456

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,2961

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

10,1308

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,5693

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,5936

KRW

South Korean won

1 417,21

ZAR

South African rand

11,4205

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

8,1439

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,5320

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

12 591,79

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

3,9845

PHP

Philippine peso

53,525

RUB

Russian rouble

40,3332

THB

Thai baht

40,079

BRL

Brazilian real

2,7199

MXN

Mexican peso

16,8684

INR

Indian rupee

70,7690

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 2935

To provide for the designation and operation of the Silas B. Hays Community

Hospital at Fort Ord, California as a satellite facility of a uniformed

services treatment facility.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

AUGUST 6, 1993

Mr. FARR of California introduced the following bill; which was referred to

the Committee on Armed Services

A BILL

To provide for the designation and operation of the Silas

B. Hays Community Hospital at Fort Ord, California

as a satellite facility of a uniformed services treatment

facility.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. CONVERSION OF SILAS B. HAYS COMMUNITY

4 HOSPITAL AT FORT ORD, CALIFORNIA TO A

5 SATELLITE FACILITY OF A UNIFORMED SERV6 ICES TREATMENT FACILITY.

7 (a) NEGOTIATIONS FOR OPERATIONS OF HOS8 PITAL.—The Secretary of Defense shall enter into negotia-
2

•HR 2935 IH

1 tions with a uniformed services treatment facility de2 scribed in section 911(a) of the Military Construction Au3 thorization Act, 1982 (42 U.S.C. 248c(a)), for the purpose

4 of arranging for the facility to assume operation of the

5 Silas B. Hays Army Community Hospital at Ford Ord,

6 California, in a manner consistent with the managed-care

7 delivery and reimbursement model required under section

8 718(c) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fis9 cal Year 1991 (Public Law 101–510; 104 Stat. 1587).

10 (b) TREATMENT AS USTF SATELLITE FACILITY.—

11 Upon completion of the negotiations under subsection (a),

12 the Secretary of Defense shall—

13 (1) consider the hospital to be a satellite facility

14 of the uniformed services treatment facility, as de15 scribed in section 721(a) of the National Defense

16 Authorization Act for Fiscal Years 1992 and 1993

17 (Public Law 102–190; 105 Stat. 1405); and

18 (2) designate the hospital as a facility of the

19 uniformed services for the purposes of chapter 55 of

20 title 10, United States Code.

21 (c) COMPLETION OF NEGOTIATIONS.—The Secretary

22 shall complete the negotiations under subsection (a) and

23 make the designation under subsection (b)(2) not later

24 than September 30, 1994.

Æ
#### Thomas Jackson JONES, Jr., Appellant, v. Susie B. JONES, Appellee.

No. 73-704.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Feb. 21, 1974.

Appeal dismissed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                      52,467,719
<SECURITIES>                                81,141,118
<RECEIVABLES>                               25,002,977
<ALLOWANCES>                                   644,132
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           164,041,746
<PP&E>                                      37,394,454
<DEPRECIATION>                               4,309,960
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             491,259,040
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       34,939,534
<BONDS>                                      2,086,672
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       380,060
<OTHER-SE>                                 453,252,774
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               491,259,040
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            56,766,601
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               31,579,640
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                           143,534,956
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           6,556,465
<INCOME-PRETAX>                          (111,791,530)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                      (111,791,530)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                             (111,791,530)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (3.03)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (3.03)


</TABLE>
# STATEOFLOUISIANA COURTOFAPPEAL,FIRSTCIRCUIT CAMSOFT DATA SYSTEMS, INC. VERSUS NO. 2022 CW 1209 SOUTHERN ELECTRONICS SUPPLY, INC. AND ACTIVE SOLUTIONS, LLC 

### JANUARY 18, 2024
In Re:
BEFORE: Camsoft Data Systems, Inc., applying writs, 19th Judicial District Court, Baton Rouge, No. 582741. McCLENDON, HOLDRIDGE, AND GREENE, JJ. for supervisory Parish of East
REFERRAL TO APPEAL RECALLED; WRIT DENIED. The criteria set forth in Herlitz Construction Co., Inc. v. Hotel Investors of New Iberia, Inc., 396 So.2d 878 (La. 1981) (per curiam), are not met. PMc GH Greene, J., concurs andwould deny the writ.

COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT 

# (,\.s,,J) DEPUTY CLERK OF COURT FOR THE COURT
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 3182

To amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to permit the admission

to the United States of nonimmigrant students and visitors who are

the spouses and children of United States permanent resident aliens,

and for other purposes.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

SEPTEMBER 29, 1993

Mr. PALLONE introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on the Judiciary

A BILL

To amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to permit

the admission to the United States of nonimmigrant

students and visitors who are the spouses and children

of United States permanent resident aliens, and for other

purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 3182 IH

1 SECTION 1. ADMISSION OF CERTAIN ‘‘B’’ AND ‘‘F’’ VISA

2 NONIMMIGRANTS WHO ARE SPOUSES OR

3 CHILDREN OF UNITED STATES PERMANENT

4 RESIDENT ALIENS.

5 Section 212 of the Immigration and Nationality Act

6 (8 U.S.C. 1182) is amended by adding at the end thereof

7 the following new subsection:

8 ‘‘(o)(1) Notwithstanding any other provision of law,

9 no alien—

10 ‘‘(A) who is the spouse or child of an alien law11 fully admitted for permanent residence to the United

12 States,

13 ‘‘(B) who seeks admission to the United States

14 for purposes of visiting the permanent resident

15 spouse or parent or for studying in the United

16 States, and

17 ‘‘(C) who is otherwise qualified,

18 may be denied issuance of a visa, or may be denied admis19 sion to the United States, as a nonimmigrant alien de20 scribed in section 101(a)(15)(B) who is coming to the

21 United States temporarily for pleasure or as a non22 immigrant alien described in section 101(a)(15)(F).

23 ‘‘(2) Whenever an alien described in paragraph (1)

24 seeks admission to the United States as a nonimmigrant

25 alien described in section 101(a)(15)(B) who is coming

26 temporarily for pleasure or as a nonimmigrant alien de-
3

•HR 3182 IH

1 scribed in section 101(a)(15)(F), the fact that a petition

2 has been filed on the alien’s behalf for classification of

3 the alien as an alien lawfully admitted for permanent resi4 dence shall not constitute evidence of the alien’s intention

5 to abandon his or her foreign residence.

6 ‘‘(3) Notwithstanding any other provision of law, any

7 alien—

8 ‘‘(A) who is issued a nonimmigrant visa under

9 paragraph (1),

10 ‘‘(B) who was admitted to the United States,

11 and

12 ‘‘(C) who remains in the United States longer

13 than the period authorized for such nonimmigrant

14 status,

15 shall be ineligible to receive an immigrant visa for a period

16 of up to one year after the alien’s priority date has been

17 reached, as the Secretary of State may determine.’’.

Æ
# C_2013352EN.01000101.xml

| 30.11.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 352/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.11.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 352/1

---

2013/C 352/01

Last publication of the Court of Justice of the European Union in the Official Journal of the European Union

Official Journal of the European Union

OJ C 344, 23.11.2013

OJ C 344, 23.11.2013

Past publications

Past publications

OJ C 336, 16.11.2013

OJ C 325, 9.11.2013

OJ C 313, 26.10.2013

OJ C 304, 19.10.2013

OJ C 298, 12.10.2013

OJ C 291, 5.10.2013

These texts are available on:

EUR-Lex: http://eur-lex.europa.eu

---
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Dynamic Health Products, Inc. (the Company)
on Form 10-QSB for the three months ended September 30, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Mandeep K. Taneja, Chief Executive Officer and President of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                     
|-------------------------------------
|/s/ Mandeep K. Taneja                
|Mandeep K. Taneja                    
|Chief Executive Officer and President
|November 13, 2006
260 La. 409

#### Mrs. Renee LEVY, Wife of and Marvin RAINES v. TRAVELERS INSURANCE COMPANY.

No. 52032.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Jan. 17, 1972.

In re: Mrs. Renee Levy, Wife of and Marvin Raines, applying for writ of certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, Parish of Orleans. 254 So.2d 659.

It is ordered that the writ of review issue ; that the Court of Appeal send up the record in duplicate of the case; and that counsel for plaintiff and defendant be notified.
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE Economics and Statistics Administration U.S. Census Bureau

Source: U.S. Census Bureau, Census 2000 for the U.S. Virgin Islands and the 2010 Census for the U.S. Virgin Islands

For more information visit www.census.gov.

West End Northside

Southside

Tutu

East End

Charlotte Amalie

Water Island

U.S.VIRGIN ISLANDS - 2010 Census Results

Percent Change in Population by Census Subdistrict: 2000 to 2010

Central

Cruz Bay

Coral

Bay

East

End

Northwest

East End

Northcentral

Southcentral

Sion Farm

Southwest

Anna's Hope Village

Frederiksted

Christian- sted

10.0 to 15.3

0.0 to 9.9

-10.0 to -0.1

-17.9 to -10.1

Percent Change

Percent Change for U.S. Virgin Islands Population: -2.0%

ST. JOHN Island (County Equivalent)

Census Subdistrict

(County Subdivision Equivalent)

Tutu

ST. THOMAS ISLAND

ST. JOHN ISLAND

ST. CROIX ISLAND

0 5 mi

0 5 mi

0 5 mi
Order entered December 1, 2014

In The 

## Court of Appeals **Fifth District of Texas at Dallas** No. 05 - 14 - 01090 - CV ZOHRA KHWAJA, Appellant V. QUIK - WAY RETAIL ASSOCIATE S II, LTD., Appellee On Appeal from the 95th Judicial District Court Dallas County, Tex as Trial Court Cause No. DC - 14 - 01589 

### O RDER We GRANT appellant’s November 25, 2014 unopposed motion for an extension of time to file a brief. We ORDER the brief tendered to this Court by appellant on November 25, 2014 filed as of the date of this order.

/s/ ELIZABETH LANG

- MIERS JUSTICE