alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT31.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

I,Edwin Witarsa Ng, certify that:

 

1.I have reviewed this quarterly report of KinerjaPay Corp.;

 

2.Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessaryto make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respectto the period covered by this report;

 

3.Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in allmaterial respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the issuer as of, and for, the periods presentedin this report;

 

4.As the issuer’s certifying officer, I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures(as 4efined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in ExchangeAct Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the issuer and have:

 

(a)Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,to ensure that material information relating to the issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by otherswithin those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

 

(b)Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designedunder our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation offinancial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

 

(c)Evaluated the effectiveness of the issuer’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusionsabout the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based onsuch evaluation; and

 

(d)Disclosed in this report any change in the issuer’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the issuer’smost recent fiscal quarter (the issuer’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected,or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the issuer’s internal control over financial reporting; and

 

5.As the issuer’s certifying officer, I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internal control over financialreporting, to the issuer’s auditors and the audit committee of the issuer’s board of directors (or persons performingthe equivalent functions if applicable):

 

(a)All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting whichare reasonably likely to adversely affect the issuer’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;and

 

(b)Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the issuer’sinternal control over financial reporting.
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3150 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3150

  To designate the Federal Justice Building in Miami, Florida, as the 
           ``James Lawrence King Federal Justice Building''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 28, 1993

Mr. Hastings (for himself and Mrs. Meek) introduced the following bill; 
 which was referred to the Committee on Public Works and Transportation

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To designate the Federal Justice Building in Miami, Florida, as the 
           ``James Lawrence King Federal Justice Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The Federal Justice Building located at 99 Northeast Fourth Street 
in Miami, Florida, shall be known and designated as the ``James 
Lawrence King Federal Justice Building''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the Federal building referred to in 
section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``James Lawrence 
King Federal Justice Building''.

                                 <all>
```
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

JUDGMENT

No. 04-14-00491-CV

William M. COLLINS and Patricia Collins,

Appellants

v.

Dr. Oliver WILLIAMS,

Appellee

From the 216th Judicial District Court, Gillespie County, Texas

Trial Court No. 13648

Honorable N. Keith Williams, Judge Presiding

BEFORE JUSTICE ANGELINI, JUSTICE BARNARD, AND JUSTICE MARTINEZ

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the order of the trial court is 

AFFIRMED. It is ORDERED that appellee, Dr. Oliver Williams, recover his costs of this appeal 

from appellants, William M. Collins and Patricia Collins.

SIGNED May 6, 2015.

_____________________________

Marialyn Barnard, Justice
##### 



1)
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q/A of World Air Holdings, Inc.;2)
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement
of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
report;3)
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of
the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4)
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of
the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most
recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely
to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial
reporting; and5)
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control
over financial reporting.
 Date: 2/21/06
    /s/ Randy J. MartinezRandy J. Martinez
Chief Executive Officer
of World Air Holdings, Inc.
# C_2014014EN.01000201.xml

| 18.1.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 14/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.1.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 14/2

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.7080 — Dimension Data/Nextiraone Assets)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2014/C 14/03

On 9 January 2014, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32014M7080. EUR-Lex is the online access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32014M7080. EUR-Lex is the online access to the European law.

---
EXHIBIT 32.2



CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF

THE SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002



In connection
with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Dataram Corporation (the “Company”), as filed with the U.S. Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Anthony M. Lougee, the Chief Accounting Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements
    of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report
    fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|Dated: August 7, 2015 | By: | /s/ Anthony M. Lougee    | 
|--------------------- | --- | ------------------------ | 
|                      |     | Anthony M. Lougee        | 
|                      |     | Chief Accounting Officer |
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR ADC TELECOMMUNICATIONS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES FOR
THE SIX-MONTH PERIOD ENDED APRIL 30, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          OCT-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             NOV-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-30-1999
<CASH>                                         171,528
<SECURITIES>                                    41,285
<RECEIVABLES>                                  358,811<F1>
<ALLOWANCES>                                     7,942
<INVENTORY>                                    215,759<F2>
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               856,216
<PP&E>                                         559,119
<DEPRECIATION>                                 265,948
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,465,442
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          336,082
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        27,216
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,088,352
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,465,442
<SALES>                                        860,885
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               860,885
<CGS>                                          452,776
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  452,776
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               342,657
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 2,307
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               5,914
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 64,285
<INCOME-TAX>                                    28,677
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             35,608
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    35,608
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.13
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.13
<FN>
<F1>AMOUNT IS NET OF ALLOWANCE FOR BAD DEBT AND RETURNS
<F2>AMOUNT IS NET OF OBSOLESCENCE RESERVES
</FN>


</TABLE>
# C_2013379EN.01000101.xml

| 28.12.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 379/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.12.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 379/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.7070 — Gestamp Eólica/Banco Santander/JV)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2013/C 379/01)

On 16 December 2013, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32013M7070. EUR-Lex is the online access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32013M7070. EUR-Lex is the online access to the European law.

---
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 97-2019
LAWRENCE VERLINE WILDER, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus RICHARD RILEY, SECRETARY, UNITED STATESDEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION; SALLIE MAE, INCORPORATED; FREEMAN A. HRABOWSKI, Presi dent, University of Maryland, Baltimore County; MICHAEL HOOKER, President, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District ofMaryland, at Baltimore. Frederic N. Smalkin, District Judge. (CA97-2230-S) Submitted: October 23, 1997 Decided: November 13, 1997 Before HAMILTON and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Lawrence Verline Wilder, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) complaint. We have reviewed the recordand the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Wilder v. Riley, Sec., United States Dep't of Educ. , No. CA-97-2230-S (D. Md. July 24, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
#### Dr. Charles J. ASWELL, Plaintiff and Appellee, v. Olide VIDRINE, Defendant and Appellant.

No. 3798.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Third Circuit.

April 19, 1972.

Preston N. Aucoin, Ville Platte, for defendant-appellant.

Dubuisson & Dubuisson by William A. Brinkhaus, Opelousas, for plaintiff-appel-lee.

Before FRUGÉ, HOOD and CULPEP-PER, JJ.

CULPEPPER, Judge.

This case was consolidated with Dupre (d/b/a Dupre’s Hospital & Clinic) v. Vidrine, La.App., 261 So.2d 288, in which a separate judgment is rendered by us this date. For the reasons stated in our decision in the companion case, the judgment appealed is reversed and set aside, and this case is remanded to the district court.

The costs of this appeal are assessed against the third party defendant, Southern Farm Bureau Casualty Insurance Company. Costs in the district court must await a final judgment there.

Reversed and remanded.

HOOD, J., dissents, being of the opinion that the judgment of the trial court is correct.
No. 00-7282.

#### Perkins *v.*Moore, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections.

C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.
**Exhibit 31.2****CERTIFICATION**     I, David A. Husband, certify that:     1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Vodavi Technology, Inc.;     2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations, and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;     4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:     a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controlsand procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;     b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and proceduresand presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and     c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting; and;     5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):     a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability torecord, process, summarize, and report financial information ; and     b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.Date: May 1, 2006                                                       /s/ David A. Husband   David A. Husband   Chief Financial Officer
# C_2014111EN.01000501.xml

| 12.4.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 111/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.4.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 111/5

---

Notice for the attention of the persons to which measures provided for in Council Decision 2011/235/CFSP, as amended by Council Decision 2014/205/CSFP and in Council Regulation (EU) No 359/2011, as implemented by Council implementing Regulation (EU) No 371/2014 concerning restrictive measures directed against certain persons, entities and bodies in view of the situation in Iran apply

(2014/C 111/03)

COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION

The following information is brought to the attention of the persons that appear in the Annex to Council Decision 2011/235/CFSP, as amended by Council Decision 2014/205/CSFP (1), and in Annex I to Council Regulation (EU) No 359/2011, as implemented by Council implementing Regulation (EU) No 371/2014 (2) concerning restrictive measures directed against certain persons, entities and bodies in view of the situation in Iran.

1

2

The Council of the European Union has decided that the persons that appear in the above-mentioned Annexes should be included in the list of persons and entities subject to restrictive measures provided for in Decision 2011/235/CFSP and in Regulation (EU) No 359/2011.

The attention of the persons concerned is drawn to the possibility of making an application to the competent authorities of the relevant Member State(s) as indicated on the websites in Annex II to Regulation (EU) No 359/2011, in order to obtain an authorisation to use frozen funds for basic needs or specific payments (cf. Article 4 of the Regulation).

The persons concerned may submit a request to the Council before 14 February 2015, together with supporting documentation, that the decision to include them on the above-mentioned list should be reconsidered, to the following address:

before 14 February 2015

| Council of the European Union |
| --- |
| General Secretariat |
| DG C 1C |
| Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175 |
| 1048 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |

Council of the European Union

General Secretariat

DG C 1C

Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175

1048 Bruxelles/Brussel

BELGIQUE/BELGIË

E-mail: sanctions@consilium.europa.eu

The attention of the persons concerned is also drawn to the possibility of challenging the Council’s decision before the General Court of the European Union, in accordance with the conditions laid down in Article 275, second paragraph, and Article 263, fourth and sixth paragraphs, of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union.

---

(1)  OJ L 109, 12.4.2014, p. 26.

1

(2)  OJ L 109, 12.4.2014, p. 10.

2

---