alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 3253

To rename Huntington Lake, Indiana, the ‘‘J. Edward Roush Lake’’.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

OCTOBER 7, 1993

Ms. LONG introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee

on Public Works and Transportation

A BILL

To rename Huntington Lake, Indiana, the ‘‘J. Edward

Roush Lake’’.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. RENAMING OF RESERVOIR.

4 Huntington Lake located on the Wabash River in

5 Huntington and Wells Counties, Indiana, authorized by

6 section 203 of the Flood Control Act of 1958 (72 Stat.

7 312) shall be known and designated as the ‘‘J. Edward

8 Roush Lake’’.

9 SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

10 Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document,

11 paper, or other record of the United States to the lake
2

•HR 3253 IH

1 referred to in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference

2 to the ‘‘J. Edward Roush Lake’’.

Æ
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                            5

<S>                                  <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                              6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                    DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                         JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                   209,352
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                            395,748
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                              180,277
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                         850,384
<PP&E>                                   680,398
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                         2,466,643
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                  1,050,134
<BONDS>                                        0
<COMMON>                                   5,305
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<OTHER-SE>                                     0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>           2,466,643
<SALES>                                1,128,817
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               0
<CGS>                                    892,486
<TOTAL-COSTS>                          1,125,222
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                         3,422
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           62,094
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       38,279
<DISCONTINUED>                            23,815
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                              62,094
<EPS-BASIC>                               0.01
<EPS-DILUTED>                               0.00




</TABLE>
<PAGE>

                   HYDRON TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

         Exhibit (11) - Statement Re: Computation of Earnings Per Share

                                         Years Ended December 31,
                                   --------------------------------------
                                      1996           1995         1994
                                   ------------  ------------  -----------

Primary:

Average shares outstanding           22,905,175    22,632,180   22,077,710
Net effect of dilutive stock
   options - based on the
   treasury stock method using
   average market price                       -       506,485      589,260
                                   ------------  ------------  -----------

Totals                               22,905,175    23,138,665   22,666,970
                                   ============  ============  ===========

Net income                         $ (2,823,977) $  1,782,588  $ 3,638,206
                                   ============  ============  ===========

Per share amount                   $      (0.12) $       0.08  $      0.16
                                   ============  ============  ===========


Fully diluted:

Average shares outstanding           22,905,175    22,632,180   22,077,710
Net effect of dilutive stock
   options - based on the
   treasury stock method using
   quarter-end market price                   -       519,203      825,044
                                   ------------  ------------  -----------

Totals                             $ 22,905,175  $ 23,151,383  $22,902,754
                                   ============  ============  ===========

Net income                         $ (2,823,977) $  1,782,588  $ 3,638,206
                                   ============  ============  ===========

Per share amount                   $      (0.12) $       0.08  $      0.16
                                   ============  ============  ===========
# C_2014344EN.01000301.xml

| 2.10.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 344/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.10.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 344/3

---

Opinion of the Advisory Committee on restrictive practices and dominant position given at its meeting of 28 April 2014 regarding a draft decision relating to Case AT.39985 — Motorola — Enforcement of GPRS standard-essential patents

Rapporteur: Bulgaria

2014/C 344/04

| 1. | The Advisory Committee agrees with Commission’s assessment in the draft decision that in the exceptional circumstances of the case and in the absence of any objective justification, Motorola has infringed Article 102 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union and Article 54 of the EEA Agreement by seeking and enforcing an injunction against Apple before the courts of the Federal Republic of Germany. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The Advisory Committee agrees with Commission’s assessment in the draft decision that in the exceptional circumstances of the case and in the absence of any objective justification, Motorola has infringed Article 102 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union and Article 54 of the EEA Agreement by seeking and enforcing an injunction against Apple before the courts of the Federal Republic of Germany.

| 2. | The Advisory Committee agrees with the Commission not to impose a fine on Motorola. |
| --- | --- |

2.

The Advisory Committee agrees with the Commission not to impose a fine on Motorola.

| 3. | The Advisory Committee recommends the publication of its opinion in the Official Journal of the European Union. |
| --- | --- |

3.

The Advisory Committee recommends the publication of its opinion in the Official Journal of the European Union.

Official Journal of the European Union

---
U.S. flag
              An official website of the United States government





---

close


Cameroon
 Basic Facts Population
 People per sq. km
 Males per 100 females
 Children per woman
 Goods exported from U.S.
 Goods imported to U.S.
 Change in exports from U.S. for 2013 to 2022
 A Closer Look Source
 Comparisons
 Compared to the U.S.
 Compared to the World
 K = Thousands
				M = Millions
				B = Billions
  Merchandise Trade U.S. Trade in Manufactured Goods
 Top Exported Goods by U.S. State or Territory
 Population Current and Projected Population
 Population by Age and Sex
 Source and Notes Source: U.S. Census Bureau, International Database (demographic data) and USA Trade Online (trade data); Central Intelligence Agency, The World Fact Book (country reference maps). This application presents data for 228 countries and areas of the world with a 2024 population of 5,000 or more. For eleven of those countries and areas, only demographic data are presented. "Data not available" indicates that data are not available from this application.  In such instances, data may be available elsewhere at the census.gov website. Trade figures presented for France do not include data for overseas departments French Guiana, Guadeloupe, Martinique, Mayotte, and Reunion but do include data for dependencies Saint Barthelemy and Saint Martin.  Trade figures for the United Kingdom include data for crown dependencies Guernsey, Isle of Man, and Jersey. To learn more about world population projections, go to Notes on the World Population Clock. To learn more about international trade data, go to Guide to Foreign Trade Statistics. All trade figures are in U.S. dollars on a nominal basis.


CONNECT WITH US
 Information Quality
                    Data Linkage Infrastructure
                    Data Protection and Privacy Policy
                    Accessibility      
                    FOIA
                    Inspector General
                    No FEAR Act
                    U.S. Department of Commerce
                    USA.gov
  Measuring America's People, Places, and Economy
Williams, Renee (OST) ^OT-/).^T- I'SM-^Hk^^^ 

.••^f-icpORTATION 

From: JjemlOO [jjem100@aol.com] "--f^DCDATiOKi^ 

Sent: Friday, October 01, 2010 9:04 AM - .^ t i 'JrtnAl 1UI\0 

To: EAS (OST) 

Subject: Airline travel between Massena and Albany --v.-j |';^r it] p B"- I 8 

Dear Mr. DeVany: 

I am writing regarding the upcoming decision as to which airiine will provide service to Massena, Watertown, 

and Ogdensburg, New York. 

I am hoping that you will continue to allow CapeAir to provide the service between Albany and Massena as it is 

a vital service for those from Massena traveling to anywhere in the greater Capital District area and for many of 

those who wish to continue their flight south to New York City and other destinations around the country. 

The students of Holy Name of Jesus Academy rely on CapeAir to accommodate their travel needs for travel 

between Massena and Albany Airport. At the present time, the student body is made up of approximately 106 

students. Four years ago, the school began, with just over 40 students. The school will continue to grow at this 

rate for several years. Since the great majority of the students are from from outside of New York, and outside 

of the United States, there exists a great demand for airline from Massena connecting to Albany Airport. 

Thank you so much for your time and attention to my request. 

Sincerely, 

Mrs. Jeanne Jemison 

Marcellus NY 13108
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE O F FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME E XPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED
NICO LE CELESTE ANDRE , App ellant ,

v. Cas e No

. 5D 22 -9 8 LT Cas e No. 2021- CF

- 00 1078- A

STAT E OF FLORIDA ,

Appellee

. ________________________________/
Decisio n filed December 6 , 2 022 Appeal from the Circuit Court for Citru s County , Richard A. Howard, J udge.
Matthew J

. Metz, Pu blic D efender, and S usan A

. Fagan, A ssistant Public Defender, Daytona B each, f or Appellant. Ashley M oody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Daniel P. Caldwell, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.
PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

EVANDER, WALLIS and EDWARDS , JJ., concur.
# C_2014384EN.01000401.xml

| 30.10.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 384/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.10.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 384/4

---

Notice concerning a request pursuant to Article 35 of Directive 2014/25/EU — Extension of Deadline

Request made by a Member State

2014/C 384/04

On 15 May 2014 the Commission received a request in accordance with Article 35 of Directive 2014/25/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 February 2014 on procurement procedures by entities operating in the water, energy, transport and postal services sectors and repealing Directive 2004/17/EC (1).

1

This request, made by the Republic of Poland, concerns the production and wholesale of electricity in that country. The relevant notice was published on page 14 of OJ C 186 on 18 June 2014. A first notice of prolongation of deadline was published in OJ C 310 of 12 September 2014. The prolonged deadline was 31 October 2014.

Pursuant to the fourth subparagraph of point 1 of Annex IV of Directive 2014/25/EU, the deadline may be further extended by the Commission with the agreement of those having made the request for exemption concerned. Given that the need to obtain and analyse further information, and with the agreement of the Republic of Poland, the period available to the Commission for deciding on this request is hereby extended further by 37 working days.

The final deadline is therefore 31 December 2014.

---

(1)  OJ L 94, 28.3.2014, p. 243.

1

---
lb 

i ICICLE 

August 20, 2012 

Mr. Dennis DeVany 

Chief, Essential Air Service and Domestic Analysis 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE 

Washington, D.C. 20590 

RE: Essential Air Service for Adak, Alaska 

DOT-OST-2000-8556 

Dear Mr. DeVany, 

Icicle Seafoods, Inc. supports the selection of Alaska Airlines to provide essential air service to the 

community of Adak, Alaska. 

00 

Icicle is a diversified seafood processing company with operations throughout coastal Alaska, including 

Adak. We have utilized Alaska Airlines to move both passengers and cargo to and from Adak since the 

airline first started servicing the community in 2003. 

We have found the services provided by Alaska Airlines essential to our business. Our needs require a 

reliable airline to move freight, fresh seafood, employees, and fishermen. It works very well to have all 

of our needs met by a single carrier and aircraft. Alaska Airlines has proven to be safe, dependable, e;md 

responsive to our needs. 

We respectfully urge DOT to select Alaska Airlines to continue to provide essential air service to Adak, 

Alaska. 

Sincerely, 

ICICLE SEAFOODS, INC. 

~~~NVJ Kris Norosz 

Government Affairs 

cc: Mr. Kevin Adams, U.S. DOT, Essential Air Service and Domestic Analysis 

1'v1r. Steve Hatter, Deputy Commissioner, Alaska Dept. of Transportation & Public Facilities 

ICICLE SEAFOODS, INC. 

4019-2]St Avenue West • Seattle, WA 98199 

P.O. Box 79003 • Seattle, WA 98119 • Tel: 206-282-0988 • Fax: 206-282-7222
Reader’s Guide for Chlorfenapyr

CRM: Susan Bartow

EPA/OCSPP/OPP/PRD

Reader’s Guide to Chlorfenapyr Docket # EPA-HQ-OPP-2010-0467

Publication Date: December 8, 2010

The Agency is providing the “Readers Guide” to allow the reader to more easily access and navigate the various entries contai ned in the chlorfenapyr docket.

Federal Register and Docket Organizational Documents:

Docket Item 1. Reader’s Guide to the Chlorfen apyr Docket # EPA-HQ-OPP-2010-0467.

Pesticide Re-evaluation Division Document

Docket Item 2. Chlorfenapyr Final Work Plan (FWP) for Registration Review. December
8, 2010.

Human Health Document

Docket Item 3. Chlorfenapyr. Public Comments Rega rding the Health Effects Division’s (HED’s) Human-Health Assessment Scoping Document in Support of Registration Review of 26-MAY- 2010. HED’s Response to Public Comments. November 4, 2010.

Environmental Fate and Effects Documents

Docket Item 4. Registration Review – Problem Form ulation Revised Based on Public Comments for Ecological Risk, Environmental Fate, and Endangered Species Assessments for Chlorfenapyr. October 28, 2010.

Docket Item 5. Response to Comments on the Pre liminary Problem Formulation for Chlorfenapyr. October 28, 2010.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          AUG-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             SEP-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               AUG-31-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                           6,928
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   97,819
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     77,166
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               203,057
<PP&E>                                         401,012
<DEPRECIATION>                               (144,254)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 533,486
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          134,102
<BONDS>                                        174,061
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         9,209
<OTHER-SE>                                     161,557
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   533,486
<SALES>                                        588,933
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               588,933
<CGS>                                          495,908
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  495,908
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              13,182
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 31,538
<INCOME-TAX>                                    12,221
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             19,317
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    19,317
<EPS-BASIC>                                       2.11
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     2.11


</TABLE>
November 10, 2015



### JUDGMENT 

## The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

IN THE INTEREST OF X .F.H., Z.T.A.A. AND J.D.K., CHILDREN

NO. 14

- 15

- 00492

- CV

________________________________ This cause, an appeal from a judgment terminating parental rights signed May 11, 2015, was heard on the transcript of the record. We have inspected the record and find no error in the ju dgment. We order the judgment of the court below AFFIRMED

. We further order this decision certified below for observance. We further order that mandate be issued immediately.
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 3031

To repeal the reduction in the deductible portion of business meals and

entertainment made by the Revenue Reconciliation Act of 1993.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

SEPTEMBER 8, 1993

Mr. ZIMMER (for himself, Mr. LIGHTFOOT, and Mr. PORTMAN) introduced the

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

A BILL

To repeal the reduction in the deductible portion of business

meals and entertainment made by the Revenue Reconciliation Act of 1993.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. REPEAL OF REDUCTION IN DEDUCTIBLE POR4 TION OF BUSINESS MEALS AND ENTERTAIN5 MENT.

6 Section 13209 of the Revenue Reconciliation Act of

7 1993 is hereby repealed, and the Internal Revenue Code

8 of 1986 shall be applied and administered as if such sec9 tion (and the amendments made thereby) had not been

10 enacted.
2

•HR 3031 IH

Æ
#### STATE of Florida, Petitioner, v. Joseph Warren MONCUR, Respondent.

No. 42489.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Aug. 4, 1972.

Certiorari denied. 262 So.2d 688.

CARLTON, Acting C. J., and ADKINS, BOYD, McCAIN and DEKLE, JJ., concur.
This fileset includes supporting documents for BART-eligible sources in Oklahoma granted 

waivers by ODEQ after permit modifications. Each facility has applied for a permit modification to 

include federally enforceable limits on potential emissions and allow them to qualify for waivers from 

installing from BART. 

Georgia Pacific Consumer Products LP – Muskogee Mill

• Georgia Pacific_#2 03-30-07.pdf 

• Georgia Pacific_#3 03-30-07.pdf 

• Georgia Pacific_#4 03-30-07.pdf 

• Georgia Pacific_03-20-08.pdf 

• Georgia Pacific_03-29-07.pdf 

• Georgia Pacific_03-30-07.pdf 

• Georgia Pacific_04-07-08.pdf 

• Georgia Pacific_04-09-08.pdf 

• Georgia Pacific_07-31-07.pdf 

• Georgia Pacific_Draft Georgia Pacific Muskogee.pdf 

• Georgia Pacific_March 2007.pdf 

• GP Muskogee Mill 99113-v9.doc 

International Paper – Valliant Paper Mill

• Intl Paper Valiant.doc 

• Intl Paper Valient 97057-v10.doc 

Western Farmers Electric Coop – Anadarko Plant

• Western Farmers Electric.doc 

• Western Farmers Electric 2005037-vr1.doc 

• Western Farmers Electric 2005037-vr2.doc
#### James D. CANTRELL, Appellant, v. RESERVE INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellee.

No. 71-822.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Aug. 21, 1972.

Samuel E. Murrell, Jr., and S. G. Green, of Sam E. Murrell & Sons, Orlando, for appellant.

David A. Maney, Tampa, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

We have reviewed the briefs and record on appeal and heard oral argument. On the basis thereof, we are of the opinion that no reversible error has been demonstrated. The judgment appealed from is, therefore, affirmed. Malone v. Howell, 1939, 140 Fla. 693, 192 So. 224; Walker v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co., Fla.App.1958, 101 So.2d 437; and Cleland v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Ins. Co., 1959, 99 Ga.App. 130, 107 S.E.2d 904. See also Massey v. Standard Accident Insurance Company, 1939, 280 Ky. 23, 132 S.W.2d 530.

Affirmed.

OWEN and MAGER, JJ, and WEHLE, VICTOR O, Associate Judge, concur.
#### James MADDEN as Executor of the Estate of Francis Southerland, Appellant, v. A. B. GAVIN, Appellee.

No. I-128.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. First District.

Feb. 7, 1967.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE O F FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT NO T FINAL UNTIL TIME E XPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED JA RVIS KELLY , App ellant ,
v. Case No. 5D 21

- 2848 LT Case No. 2020

- CF

- 044620

- AX STAT E OF FLORIDA ,

Appellee

. ________________________________/ Decision filed October 25, 2022 Appeal from the Circuit Court for Brevard County , Tesha Ballou , Judge. Matthew J. Metz, Public D efender, and Susan A. Fagan, Assistant Pu blic Defend er, Daytona Be ach, for Appellant. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Rebecca Rock Mc Guigan, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee. PER CURIAM.
AFFIRMED. LAMBERT, C.J. , EVANDER an d EDWARDS , JJ., c oncur.
#### Bernice S. LEWIS, feme sole, Appellant, v. Raymond PURVIS, Appellee.

No. 379.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Fourth District.

Feb. 9, 1967.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
Exhibit 32.1

                           SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION
                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF
                         THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Brooklyn Cheesecake & Desserts
Company, Inc. (the "Company") on form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31,
2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on or about the date
hereof, I, Anthony J. Merante, President and Chief Executive Officer of the
Company certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge,
that

      (i)   the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) and
            Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
            and

      (ii)  the information contained in the Report fairly present, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company at the dates and for the periods indicated.

Date: May 22, 2006


                     /s/ Anthony J. Merante
                     ----------------------------------
                     Anthony J. Merante
                     President, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to Brooklyn Cheesecake & Desserts
Company, Inc. and will be retained by and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commissions or its staff upon request.