alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 10.3







 





AMENDMENT TO TERMINALING SERVICES AGREEMENT


 


(September 7, 2016)


 


 


This Amendment to Terminaling Services Agreement
is made as of the 7th day of September, 2016 between Center Point Terminal Company, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (“Terminal”),
and Apex Oil Company, Inc., a Missouri corporation (“Customer”).


 


 


RECITALS


 


A.    
Terminal and Customer are party to that certain Terminaling Services Agreement dated August 14, 2013, as amended (collectively,
the “Agreement”), which Agreement provides for the storage and handling of various petroleum products
as specified therein at the Terminal Facilities.


 


B.     
Terminal and Customer desire to amend the Agreement pursuant to the terms and conditions contained herein.


 


 


AGREEMENT


 


In consideration of the foregoing, the mutual
covenants herein contained and other good and valuable consideration (the receipt, adequacy and sufficiency of which are hereby
acknowledged by the parties by their execution hereof), the parties agree as follows:


 


1.      
Definitions. All capitalized terms not otherwise expressly defined herein shall have the respective meanings given
thereto in the Agreement.


 


2.      
Amendments.


 


2.1       Stipulated
Volumes. Schedule B of the Agreement shall be amended to increase the Stipulated Volume at the North Little Rock Terminal
Facility by 57,000 barrels effective September 7, 2016, as shown on the Amended Schedule B attached hereto and incorporated
herein by this reference.


 


3.       No
Other Modifications. Nothing contained herein in any way impairs the Agreement or alters, waives, annuls, varies or affects
any provision, condition or covenant therein, except as specifically set forth in this Amendment to the Agreement. All other terms
and provisions of the Agreement remain in full force and effect.


 


 


 


[Signature Page Immediately Follows]


 






    	 



     


    

 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have duly executed this
Agreement as of the date first written above.


 


 


CENTER POINT TERMINAL COMPANY, LLC


 


 


By:/s/ Ken Fenton                          


Name:
Ken Fenton


Title:
Executive Vice President


 


 


 


APEX OIL COMPANY, INC.


 


 


By:/s/ Christopher J. Schmitt        


Name:
Christopher J. Schmitt


Title:
Chief Financial Officer


 






    	 



     


    

 


AMENDED SCHEDULE B


 


(Effective as of September 7, 2016)


 


 


STIPULATED VOLUMES AND TYPES OF PRODUCT


 


 


	 	Albany	Baltimore	Blakeley
    Island	Chesapeake	Gates	Glenmont	Greensboro	Jacksonville	Newark	North
    Little Rock	Salisbury	St.
    Louis	Total
	Stipulated
    Volumes/bbl	612,062	853,900	N/A	78,400	101,178	1,780,140	664,107	251,618	433,000	233,559	147,123	 	5,155,087
    (excluding biodiesel and asphalt)
	Biodiesel
    volumes/bbl	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	500	 	 	 	500
	Asphalt
    Stipulated Volumes/bbl	 	 	 	165,000	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	347,820	512,820


 


This Amended Schedule B reflects all revisions to
the Agreement as of September 7, 2016.
<PAGE>

                                                                  Exhibit 23.1


                     CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS


We hereby consent to the use in this Registration Statement on Form S-1 of
our reports dated January 26, 2000 relating to the financial statements and
financial statement schedule of JNI Corporation, which appear in such
Registration Statement. We also consent to the references to us under the
heading "Experts" in such Registration Statement.


PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

San Diego, California
June 30, 2000
Exhibit 11


  DEL GLOBAL TECHNOLOGIES CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES

  COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE
  FISCAL YEAR ENDED August 1, 1998





                                                                       Per Share
                                         Net Income        Shares       Amount
                                         ----------      ----------     ------

Basic Earnings Per Share:

Income available to common
       shareholders                      $5,788,588       7,518,945      $   .77
                                         ----------                      =======

Effect of Dilutive Securities:

Warrants                                                     18,514

Options                                                     668,662
                                         ----------       ---------      

Diluted Earnings Per Share               $5,788,588       8,206,121      $   .71
                                         ==========       =========      =======
261 La. 539

#### Walter L. McCANN, Individually and on behalf of his son, Alvin E. McCann v. BATON ROUGE GENERAL HOSPITAL and Argonaut Insurance Company et al.

No. 52377.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 18, 1972.

In re: Walter L. McCann applying for certiorari or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, Parish of East Baton Rouge. 258 So.2d 618.

It is ordered that the writ of review issue; that the Court of Appeal send up the record in duplicate of the case; and that counsel for plaintiff and defendant be notified.
EXHIBITS

                             APAC TELESERVICES, INC.

         EXHIBIT (11)--STATEMENT RE:  COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE
                                   (UNAUDITED)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                          THIRTEEN WEEKS ENDED                 THIRTY-NINE WEEKS ENDED
                                     SEPTEMBER 29,       OCTOBER 1,       SEPTEMBER 29,        OCTOBER 1, 
                                         1996               1995               1996                1995
                                                   (000's omitted, except for per share data)

<S>                                        <C>               <C>                <C>                <C>
Primary shares:
 Average shares outstanding                46,342            39,600             46,261             39,600
 Net effect of dilutive stock                                                         
  options - based upon the                                                            
  treasury stock method using                                                         
  average market price                      1,774               486              1,554                486
    Totals                                 48,116            40,086             47,815             40,086

Fully diluted shares:
 Average shares outstanding                46,342            39,600             46,261             39,600
 Net effect of dilutive stock                                                         
    options - based upon the                                                          
  treasury stock method using                                                         
  quarter-end market price                  2,150               486              1,938                486
    Totals                                 48,492            40,086             48,199             40,086
    
Net income                                 $8,620            $2,231            $20,456             $7,729


Pro forma income data:
 Net income as reported                                      $2,231                                $7,729
 Pro forma adjustment to                          
  recognize C corporation
  income taxes                                                 (877)                               (3,030)
    Pro forma net income                                     $1,354                                $4,699

Primary per share amounts:
 Net income as reported                     $0.18      $0.05                     $0.43       $0.19
 Pro forma adjustment                        -         (0.02)                    -           (0.07)
  Net income as adjusted                    $0.18      $0.03                     $0.43       $0.12

Fully diluted per share amounts:
 Net income as reported                     $0.17      $0.05                     $0.42       $0.19
 Pro forma adjustment                        -         (0.02)                    -           (0.07)
  Net income as adjusted                    $0.17      $0.03                     $0.42       $0.12


</TABLE>
260 La. 1134

#### Earl GUILLORY d/b/a Ozone Motor Line v. BRASWELL MOTOR FREIGHT LINES, INC.

No. 52215.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

March 8, 1972.

In re: Braswell Motor Freight Lines, Inc. applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Second Circuit, Parish of Caddo. 256 So.2d 646.

Writ refused. On the facts found by the Court of Appeal, there is no error of law in its judgment.

McCALEB, C. J., and HAMLIN and SUMMERS, JJ., are of the opinion that the writ should be granted.
#### DIVCO-WAYNE INDUSTRIES, INC. et al., Petitioners, v. EMPLOYERS INSURANCE OF WAUSAU et al., Respondents.

No. 39866.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Nov. 30, 1970.

Certiorari denied.

ERVIN, C. J., and ROBERTS, DREW, CARLTON and ADKINS, JJ., concur.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-7127

STEPHEN HENRY SMITH,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

THEODIS BECK, Secretary of NC Prison,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle,

District Judge. (CA-05-15-5-BO)

Submitted: March 30, 2006 Decided: April 6, 2006

Before TRAXLER, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Stephen Henry Smith, Appellant Pro Se. Clarence Joe DelForge, III,

NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Raleigh, North Carolina, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Stephen Henry Smith, a North Carolina prisoner, seeks to

appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his petition

filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000). An appeal may not be taken

from the final order in a habeas corpus proceeding unless a circuit

justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C.

§ 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue

absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional

right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this

standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that

the district court’s assessment of his constitutional claims is

debatable and that any dispositive procedural rulings by the

district court are also debatable or wrong. See Miller-El v.

Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S.

473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee, 252 F.3d 676, 683 (4th Cir. 2001).

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Smith

has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a

certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
21 A PRIL 2015

Twelfth Court of Appeals

1517 West Front Street

Suite 354

Tyler, TX 75702

Re: Walter Royer v. State

12

- 14

- 00074

- CR

12

- 14

- 00075

- CR

Ms. Lusk :

Attached, please find a copy of the letter sent to my client regarding the opinion issued by the

Court and the right to file a PDR

.

If there is anything else I need to do, please let me know.

Sincerely,

/s/ Austin Reeve Jackson27 M ARCH 2015

Mr. Lee Vincent

Inmate: 01978797

Gurney Unit

1385 FM 3328

Palestine, TX 75803

Re: Opinion

Mr. Vincent

Please find enclosed a copy of opinion issued by the Twelfth Court of Appeals in your case. The

Court has affirmed your conviction.

Should you desire to do so, you do have the right to file a pro se Petition for Discretionary

Review in the Court of Criminal Appeals. If you decide to pursue that option you must file your

petition prior to the expira tion of thirty days from the date of the court’s opinion. That is by, 24

April 2015.

I would be happy to address any questions or concerns you have if you will simply let me know.

Sincerely,

Austin Reeve Jackson
#### LATEX CONSTRUCTION COMPANY and Argonaut Insurance Company, Petitioners, v. John Moses McCORD, deceased, and Helen Ruth McCord et al., Respondents.

No. 42483.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Oct. 16, 1972.

Rehearing Denied Nov. 28, 1972.

Certiorari denied.

CARLTON, Acting C. J., and ADKINS, BOYD, McCAIN and DEKLE, JJ., concur.
#### Homer Charles NEAL, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 72-1034.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Nov. 7, 1973.

Appeal dismissed.
#### Charles E. STINES, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 72-846.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Nov. 16, 1972.

Appeal dismissed.
DECORATOR INDUSTRIES, INC.
             COMPUTATION OF DILUTED INCOME PER SHARE OF COMMON STOCK
                 FOR THE FIVE FISCAL YEARS ENDED JANUARY 2, 1999

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>


                                  1998                1997               1996              1995               1994
                                  ----                ----               ----              ----               ----
<S>                              <C>                 <C>                <C>               <C>                <C>       
Net income                       $3,080,895          $2,898,339         $3,065,220        $2,414,678         $2,823,770
                              ==============     ===============    ===============    ==============     ==============

Average number of
common shares
outstanding                       3,631,457           3,714,838          3,646,830         4,039,950          4,108,274

Dilutive effect of
stock options on
net income                          249,162             253,542            277,560           319,701            414,021
                              --------------     ---------------    ---------------    --------------     --------------

                                  3,880,619           3,968,380          3,924,390         4,359,651          4,522,295
                              ==============     ===============    ===============    ==============     ==============

Diluted earnings
per share:

Net income                            $0.79               $0.73              $0.78             $0.55              $0.62
                              ==============     ===============    ===============    ==============     ==============
</TABLE>



Note:   Per share amounts and shares outstanding have been adjusted for a
        five-for-four stock splits effective July 21, 1998 and June 13, 1997, a
        four-for-three stock split in June 1996 and a two-for-one stock split in
        April 1993.
**EXHIBIT
      23.1**










**Consent
      Of Independent**  **Registered
      Public Accounting Firm**







We
      hereby
      consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on
      Form
      S-8 (No. 333-119849) of QSGI INC. (formerly WindsorTech, Inc.) of our report
      dated February 17, 2006, relating to the consolidated financial statements,
      which appears in this Annual Report on Form 10-KSB.













/s/
      RubinBrown LLP





St.
      Louis, Missouri


March
      30,
      2006
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY WASHINGTON , D.C

. 20460

Mr. J. R. Stroble Manager, National TRU Program Ca rlsbad Field Office U.S. Department of Energy P.O. Box 3090 Carlsbad , NM 88221

- 3090 Dear 

### Mr. Stroble: 

### APR 1 6 2014 OFFICE OF A IR AN D R A D I A TION

On October I, 2013, the Carlsbad Field Office (CBFO) requested that, as a Tier I (TI) change, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) approve remote-handled (RH) tran suranic (TRU) w as te stream 10-EBR-SSOOO (Lot 5B) at the Idaho National Laboratory (INL) for disposal at the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP). EPA has reviewed the information provided and approves the addition of this waste stream to those approve d for disposal at WIPP. The enclosed report (EPA Docket No. A-98-49; II-A4- 183) details EPA's evaluation. This approval also allows the future addition of debris waste to this stream with a similar waste pedigree (radiological and physical contents) and characterized using the processes discu ssed in the enclosed report. If you have any questions regarding this approval, please contact Raj ani J oglekar at (202) 343-9462 o r Ed Feltcorn at (202) 343-9422.

Enclosure
cc: Electronic Distribution Alton Harris, DO E EM Joe Franco , CBFO Ma rcu s Pinzel, CBFO NTP Ben Rob erts , DO E ID Trais Kilphuis , NMED 

### Site Do cuments Sincerely,

# ~~ Tom Peake, Director Center for Waste Management and Regul ations

l nteme t Ad dress (UR L ) • http:// www . e pa . gov Rec:yc l edfRecyclable • Printed wit h Vegetable Oil Based Inks on 1OO"'o Postconsumer, Process Chlorine Free Recycled Paper
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 157 (Tuesday, August 14, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Pages 40215-40216]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-17511]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Forest Service


Snow King Mountain Resort On-Mountain Improvements Project 
Environmental Impact Statement. Bridger-Teton National Forest, Jackson 
Ranger District, Teton County, Wyoming

AGENCY: Forest Service, USDA.

[[Page 40216]]


ACTION: Correction and extension of comment period.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The USDA Forest Service, Bridger-Teton National Forest (BTNF) 
published in the Federal Register on August 3, 2018 a Notice of Intent 
(NOI) to prepare an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) for the Snow 
King Mountain Resort On-mountain Improvements Project. The NOI 
referenced an incorrect project website address and the date the 
comment period ends was unclear; this notice provides a technical 
correction to the NOI to provide the correct website and also clarifies 
and extends the scoping comment period.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mary Moore, Jackson District Ranger, 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#abc6cad9d2c6c4c4d9ceebcdd885cdcecf85ded8"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="5b363a2922363434293e1b3d28753d3e3f752e28">[email protected]</span></a> or (307) 739-5410. Individuals who use 
telecommunication devices for the deaf (TDD) may call the Federal 
Information Relay Service (FIRS) at 1-800-877-8339 between 8:00 a.m. 
and 8:00 p.m., Eastern Time, Monday through Friday.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Correction

    In the Federal Register on August 3, 2018 (83 FR 38117), on p. 
38117, in the first column, correct the DATES caption to read:
    DATES: Comments concerning the scope of the analysis must be 
received by September 13, 2018.

Correction

    In the Federal Register on August 3, 2018 (83 FR 38117) on page 
38118, in the second column, correct the first paragraph (under 
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION caption, in the Proposed Action subheading) 
to read:
    A more detailed description of the proposed action, including maps, 
is available at: http://www.fs.usda.gov/project/?project=54201.

    Dated: August 6, 2018.
Kevin Heikkila,
Acting Associate Deputy Chief, National Forest System.
[FR Doc. 2018-17511 Filed 8-13-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 3411-15-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
EXHIBIT 32.1

SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of Veritas DGC Inc. (the "Company") for the year ended July 31, 2004 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Form 10-K/A"), I, Thierry Pilenko, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
Section 1350 of Chapter 6 of Title 18 of the United States Code, that:

1.     The
Form 10-K/A fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;

2.     The
information contained in the Form 10-K/A fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

|May 27, 2005                                              |  | 
|--------------------------------------------------------- |  | 
|/s/THIERRY PILENKOThierry Pilenko Chief Executive Officer |  | 

A
signed original of this written statement required by Rule 13a-14(b) has been provided to Veritas DGC Inc. and will be retained by Veritas DGC Inc. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---



QuickLinks
Exhibit 32.2 
 
 CERTIFICATION OF THE PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
 PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 In connection with the annual report of DGT Holdings Corp., (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ended July 30, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Mark A. Zorko, Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:
 
 1.
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 
 2.
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 
 September 26, 2011

/s/ Mark A. ZorkoName:
Mark A. ZorkoTitle:
Chief Financial Officer

(Principal Financial Officer)
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3197 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3197

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

             November 9 (legislative day, November 2), 1993

  Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Governmental 
                                Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
To redesignate the postal facility located at 2100 North 13th Street in 
     Reading, Pennsylvania, as the ``Gus Yatron Postal Facility''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REDESIGNATION.

    The postal facility located at 2100 North 13th Street in Reading, 
Pennsylvania, and known as the Reading General Mail Facility, shall be 
known and designated as the ``Gus Yatron Postal Facility''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the postal facility referred to in 
section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the Gus Yatron Postal 
Facility.

            Passed the House of Representatives November 8, 1993.

            Attest:

                                           DONNALD K. ANDERSON,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE


SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Brooklyn Cheesecake & Desserts Company, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Anthony J. Merante, President, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(i)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(ii)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date: May 13, 2011


/s/ Anthony J. MeranteAnthony J. MeranteChairman, President, Chief Executive Officer and Chief FinancialOfficer