alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
ADJUSTING THE FREEZER DRAWER 

LEVEL 

1. Locate the height-adjuster ( 1 ) in the freezer drawer. 

Unscrew the 8 Phillips screws ( 2 ) slighUy to loosen 

the door. 

2. Loosen the controller 

screw ( 3 ) with a Phillips 

SCr9'Ndriver (+). 

3. Find the best level to align the door slope. 

• After adjustment, 

tighten the 

controlier screw 

and then the 

philips screws. 

Example) The slope is about O.08inch (2mm) as shown below, 

- Rotate the height adjuster to -2.0 to reduce the door slope. 

INSTALLING THE WATER 

DISPENSER LINE 

A water dispenser with a filter is one of the helpful 

features on your new refrigerator. To help promote 

better health, the water filter removes unwanted 

particles from your water. However, it does not 

sterilize or destroy microorganisms. You may need to 

purchase a water purifying system to do that. 

In order for the ice maker to operate property, a water 

pressure of 20-125 psi is required. 

Under nonnal conditions, a 170 cc (S.7S oz.) cup can 

be filled in about 10 seconds. 

If the refrigerator is installed in an area with low water 

pressure (below 20psij, you can install a booster pump 

to compensate for the low pressure. 

After you have connected the water line, make 

sure the water storage tank inside the refrigerator is 

properly filled. To do this, press the water dispenser 

lever until the water runs from the water outlet. 

fU?l Water line installation kits are available at extra 

ll::.J cost from your dealer. 

We recommend using a water line installation kit that 

contains copper tubing and 1A ~ compression nut. 

Connecting to the water supply line 

,. >~""o"'. ___ ~ 

2. Locate the nearest cold water drinking line and 

install the pipe 

clamp and shut 

off valve. Cold water line ___ +-

Shut off valve 

3. Connect the water line installation kit to the shut off 

valve. 

Cold wat&f" lin. __ + 

Water lin. installation kit 

Pipe clamp 

Shut off valve 

setting up _09
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                      24,797,000
<SECURITIES>                                 9,131,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                9,523,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                 1,565,000
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            45,761,000
<PP&E>                                       7,382,000
<DEPRECIATION>                               3,186,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              52,205,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       16,154,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       121,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  35,930,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                52,205,000
<SALES>                                     16,374,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            22,520,000
<CGS>                                        1,359,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                3,118,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            18,620,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               263,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,369,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                   509,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            860,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   860,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.07
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.07
        

</TABLE>
#### Robert R. FRANK, Appellant, v. LINCOLN BAY FRONT BUILDING CORP., a Florida corporation, and City of Miami Beach, a Municipal corporation, Appellees.

No. 70-1059.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Feb. 4, 1971.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5 
<LEGEND> 
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE 
EARNINGS STATEMENT AND THE BALANCE SHEET AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY 
BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.  THIS FINANCIAL DATA SCHEDULE
IS RESTATED DUE TO THE CHANGE IN ACCOUNTING STANDARD FOR EARNINGS
PER SHARE (SFAS 128). 
 
</LEGEND> 
<RESTATED> 
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000 
        
<S>                             <C> 
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS 
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997 
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997 
<CASH>                                             981 
<SECURITIES>                                         0 
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,566 
<ALLOWANCES>                                        95 
<INVENTORY>                                      1,016 
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 4,679 
<PP&E>                                           6,056 
<DEPRECIATION>                                   2,601 
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  10,697 
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            2,414 
<BONDS>                                            567<F1> 
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0 
<PREFERRED>                                        284 
<COMMON>                                             5 
<OTHER-SE>                                       5,648 
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    10,697 
<SALES>                                          3,338 
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 3,400 
<CGS>                                            1,053 
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    1,053 
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   564<F2> 
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0 
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  18 
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    564 
<INCOME-TAX>                                       192 
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                372 
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0 
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0 
<CHANGES>                                            0 
<NET-INCOME>                                       372 
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .72 
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .71 
<FN> 
<F1>EXCLUDES COMPANY'S GUARANTEE OF ESOP DEBT:  240 
<F2>ONLY INCLUDES R&D EXPENSE. 
</FN> 
        


</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                               ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In   connection with the Annual Report of Del Laboratories, Inc. (the "Company")
     on Form 10-K/A for the period ended December 31, 2003 as filed with the
     Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I Dan
     K. Wassong, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
     Section 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
     Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




/S/ DAN K. WASSONG
------------------------------------
Dan K. Wassong
Chief Executive Officer
December 2, 2004



<PAGE>
#### Pinyoung THOMPSON, Petitioner, v. CITY OF ORLANDO, Respondent.

No. 71-7.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Jan. 28, 1971.

Certiorari dismissed.
<PAGE>



                                                            Exhibit 5 to Annual
                                                            Report On Form 10-K
                                                            For the Year Ended
                                                            December 31, 1995




                                        April 14, 1995



Mr. William McMenemy
c/o Del Laboratories, Inc.
565 Broad Hollow Road
Farmingdale, New York  11735

Dear Mr. McMenemy:

     This will confirm that your Employment Agreement, as amended and extended,
is further extended to March 31, 2000.

     In all other respects the Employment Agreement, as amended and extended,
shall continue in full force and effect.

     Please signify your agreement with the foregoing by counter-signing the
copy of this letter and returning it to me.

                                        Very truly yours,

                                        DEL LABORATORIES, INC.



                                        By: /s/ Dan K. Wassong
                                            ----------------------
                                            Dan K. Wassong
                                            Chairman of the Board

ACCEPTED AND AGREED:



/s/ William McMenemy
---------------------
William McMenemy
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Cogo Group, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period
ending December 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Frank Zheng, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to my knowledge that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



/s/ Frank ZhengFrank ZhengChief Financial OfficerDate: March 16, 2009


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Cogo Group,
Inc. and will be retained by Cogo Group, Inc. furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<partyblock><br><br><div align="center"><b><font size="+1">NY Refinishing, Inc., Respondent,<br><br>against<br><br>James C. Lucas, Appellant. </font></b></div><br><br><p>James C. Lucas, appellant pro se.NY Refinishing, Inc., respondent pro se (no brief filed).</p><p>Appeal from a judgment of the City Court of Middletown, Orange County (Richard J. Guertin, J.), entered October 18, 2018. The judgment, after a nonjury trial, awarded plaintiff the principal sum of $850.</p><p>ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed, without costs.</p><p>Plaintiff commenced this commercial claims action to recover the principal sum of $850 for unpaid work it had performed for defendant. At a nonjury trial, plaintiff's owner testified that, over a 20-hour period, he had refinished and reglazed defendant's bathtub and shower in a professional and workmanlike manner, and was owed the agreed-upon price of $850. Plaintiff submitted photographs of the finished work. Defendant testified that there were defects in plaintiff's work. Following the trial, the City Court awarded plaintiff the principal sum of $850.</p><p>In a commercial claims action, our review is limited to a determination of whether "substantial justice has . . . been done between the parties according to the rules and principles of substantive law" (UCCA 1807-A [a]; <i>see</i> UCCA 1804-A; <i>Ross v Friedman</i>, 269 AD2d 584 [2000]; <i>Williams v Roper</i>, 269 AD2d 125 [2000]). The determination of a trier of fact as to issues of credibility is given substantial deference, as a trial court's opportunity to observe and evaluate the testimony and demeanor of the witnesses affords it a better perspective from which to assess their credibility (<i>see Vizzari v State of New York</i>, 184 AD2d 564 [1992]; <i>Kincade v Kincade</i>, 178 AD2d 510 [1991]). The deference normally accorded to the credibility determinations of a trial court applies with greater force in the Commercial Claims Part of the court, given the limited scope of review (<i>see Williams v Roper</i>, 269 AD2d at 126).</p><p>Upon a review of the record, we find that the City Court's determination in favor of plaintiff rendered substantial justice between the parties in accordance with the rules and principles of substantive law (<i>see</i> UCCA 1804-A, UCCA 1807-A [a]).</p><p>Accordingly, the judgment is affirmed.</p><p>TOLBERT, J.P., RUDERMAN and EMERSON, JJ., concur.</p><br>ENTER:<br>Paul Kenny<br>Chief Clerk<br>Decision Date: January 30, 2020<br><br><div align="center"><form method="LINK" action="../../slipidx/at_2_idxtable.shtml"><input type="submit" value="Return to Decision List"></form></div></partyblock>
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3255 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3255

To repeal the Cable Television Consumer Protection and Competition Act 
                                of 1992.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 12, 1993

 Mr. Barton of Texas introduced the following bill; which was referred 
                to the Committee on Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To repeal the Cable Television Consumer Protection and Competition Act 
                                of 1992.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Cable Consumer Protection and 
Competition Act of 1993''.

SEC. 2. REPEAL OF 1992 CABLE REREGULATION LAW.

    (a) Repeal.--Except as provided in subsection (c), the Cable 
Television Consumer Protection and Competition Act of 1992 is repealed.
    (b) Effect of Repeal; Restoration of Prior Law.--Except as provided 
in subsection (c), each section of the Communications Act of 1934 
amended by the Cable Television Consumer Protection and Competition Act 
of 1992 shall be applied as if the Cable Television Consumer Protection 
and Competition Act of 1992 had not been enacted.
    (c) Retransmission Consent.--Notwithstanding subsection (a), 
section 6 of the Cable Television Consumer Protection and Competition 
Act of 1992 is not repealed.

SEC. 3. REGULATIONS RESCINDED.

    Any regulations prescribed by the Federal Communications Commission 
to implement amendments made by the Cable Television Consumer 
Protection and Competition Act of 1992 (other than section 25 thereof) 
shall cease to be effective on the date of enactment of this Act. The 
Commission shall promptly act to amend or rescind its regulations as 
necessary to comply with this Act.

                                 <all>
```
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20460 

Ms. Lisa Messinger 

V ectren Corporation 

I N. Main Street 

Evansville, Indiana 47708 

Ms. Messinger: 

JUL 3 1 2013 

OFFICE OF WATER 

The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has received your request for plant-specific 

information, including estimated compliance costs and pollutant removals, related to the 

proposed revisions to the Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric 

Power Generating Point Source Category (Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-OW-2009-0819). In 

response to your request, please find enclosed a disc containing one file and six attachments for 

each plant for which costs/removals are being provided. The file and attachments present the 

input values and the costs and pollutant removals for the requested plants, as well as additional 

information regarding EPA's estimation of these values. The EPA is providing costs and 

pollutant removals for the following plants: 

• A.B. Brown Generating Station (08502); and 

• F.B. Culley Generation Station (08965). 

The information provided in the enclosed disc may contain information that was claimed by your 

company's plants as confidential business information (CBI) in response to the Questionnaire for 

the Steam Electric Power Generating Effluent Guidelines. The EPA is not responsible for the 

release of this CBI if you or others in your company provide these attachments to other parties. If 

you have any questions regarding these estimates, please contact me at (202) 566-1755 or 

alicea.jezebele@epa.gov. 

Thank you for your interest in the steam electric effluent guidelines rulemaking process. 

Sincerely, 

Jezebele Alicea Virella 

Engineering and Analysis Division (4303T) 

Enclosures 

Internet Address (URL) • http·/fwww.epa.gov 

Recycled/Recyclable • Printed w1th Vegetable Oil Based Inks on 100% Postconsumer. Process Chlorine Free Recycled Paper
# C_2014046EN.01000102.xml

| 18.2.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 46/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.2.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 46/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.6258 — Teva/Cephalon)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2014/C 46/02)

On 13 October 2011, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32011M6258. EUR-Lex is the online access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32011M6258. EUR-Lex is the online access to the European law.

---
# C_2014053EN.01000101.xml

| 25.2.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 53/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.2.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 53/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.7173 — Apax Partners/Trader Media Group)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2014/C 53/01

On 13 February 2014, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32014M7173. EUR-Lex is the online access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32014M7173. EUR-Lex is the online access to the European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                                              5

<S>                                                 <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                       3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                                DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                                   JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                                     MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                                                 193,000
<SECURITIES>                                                                 0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                        5,490,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                                        (1,862,000)
<INVENTORY>                                                          4,132,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                                     8,517,000
<PP&E>                                                               6,298,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                                      (3,998,000)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                      14,564,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                                7,133,000
<BONDS>                                                                      0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                                        0
<PREFERRED>                                                                  0
<COMMON>                                                            23,676,000
<OTHER-SE>                                                         (19,520,000)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                        14,564,000
<SALES>                                                              8,403,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                                     8,403,000
<CGS>                                                                3,787,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                                0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                     4,685,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                             0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                                   2,847,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                                      2,778,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                                            54,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                                  2,724,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                                               0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                              0
<CHANGES>                                                                    0
<NET-INCOME>                                                         2,724,000
<EPS-BASIC>                                                               0.27
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                             0.25


</TABLE>
Exhibit
      23.2
   CONSENT
        OF REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
 
 In
        connection with the foregoing 2006 Form 10-K to be filed with the Washington,
        D.C. Office of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, we hereby consent
        to
        the inclusion of our report dated March 17, 2006 related to the audits of
        the
        financial statements of Croff Enterprises, Inc. as of December 31, 2005,
        and for
        each of the two years in the period ended December 31, 2005.
  Denver,
                    Colorado
                
                /s/CAUSEY
                    DEMGEN & MOORE
                    INC.August
                    27,
                    2007