alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Iridium
LLC's financial statements for the quarter ended September 30, 1997 and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000948421
<NAME> IRIDIUM LLC
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                           9,189
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                37,660
<PP&E>                                       3,060,644
<DEPRECIATION>                                  48,722
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,190,885
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          414,872
<BONDS>                                      1,015,513
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     38,511
<COMMON>                                     2,019,107
<OTHER-SE>                                   (304,090)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,190,885
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                84,997
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (84,095)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (84,095)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (84,095)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.60)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.54)
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
 
 In connection with the Quarterly Report of Pharmacyclics, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Robert W. Duggan, Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer
 of the Company, certify, pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350), that to my knowledge:
 
 (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 /s/ ROBERT W. DUGGANRobert W. DugganChairman of the Board and Chief Executive OfficerNovember 5, 2010
 
 
 
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
 
 In connection with the Quarterly Report of Pharmacyclics, Inc, a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Rainer M. Erdtmann, Vice President, Finance and Administration and Secretary of the Company, certify, pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350), that to my knowledge:
 
 (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 /s/ RAINER M. ERDTMANNRainer M. ErdtmannVice President, Finance and Administration and Secretary (Principal Accounting and Financial Officer)November 5, 2010
#### STATE of Florida ex rel. Michael Robert RETCHIN, Relator, v. Honorable Jack M. TURNER, Judge, Criminal Court of Record, Dade County, Florida, Respondent.

No. 71-144.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Feb. 11, 1971.

PER CURIAM.

Prohibition denied.
#### Guion T. DeLOACH and Gertrude DeLoach, his wife, Appellants, v. THREE BAYS PROPERTIES #2, INC., and Gables Estates Club, Inc., Appellees.

No. 67-262.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Third District.

Dec. 27, 1967.

Guión T. DeLoach, Leonard G. McNeil, Miami, for appellants.

Mershon, Sawyer, Johnston, Dunwody & Cole and Robert G. Lilly, Jr., Miami, for Three Bays.

Walton, Lantaff, Schroeder, Carson & Wahl and Aubrey V. Kendall, Miami, for Gables Estates.

Before PEARSON, BARKDULL and HENDRY, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal by the plaintiffs in the trial court, seeking a reversal of an adverse order dismissing their complaint for declaratory relief.

We affirm.

 The record on appeal, viewed in a light most favorable to the appellants, fails to demonstrate that they were entitled to a declaration of rights at the time of the entry of the order here under review. Bryant v. Gary, Fla.1954, 70 So.2d 581; Colby, v. Colby, Fla.App.1960, 120 So.2d 797; Grable v. Hillsborough County Port Authority, Fla.App.1961, 132 So.2d 423. The most that a declaration could have done would have been to render an advisory opinion. Colby v. Colby, supra; Ashe v. City of Boca Raton, Fla.App.1961, 133 So.2d 122; Village of Virginia Gardens v. City of Miami Springs, Fla.App.1965, 171 So.2d 199. There was no- present existing controversy between the parties at the time the cause was dismissed. Colby v. Colby, supra; Grable v. Hillsborough County Port Authority, supra; Perry v. Genung, Fla. App.1964, 163 So.2d 54.

Therefore, the action of the chancellor be and the same is hereby affirmed.

Affirmed.
# C_2014081EN.01000401.xml

| 20.3.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 81/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.3.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 81/4

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

19 March 2014

2014/C 81/03

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,3913 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 141,31 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4641 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,83680 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 8,8339 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,2167 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,3175 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 27,460 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 310,08 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,1982 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,4915 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 3,0910 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,5269 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,5545 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 10,8026 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,6142 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,7615 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 488,77 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 14,9134 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 8,6212 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,6598 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 15 740,61 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,5667 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 62,404 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 49,9800 |
| THB | Thai baht | 44,754 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 3,2493 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 18,3039 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 84,7928 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,3913

JPY

Japanese yen

141,31

DKK

Danish krone

7,4641

GBP

Pound sterling

0,83680

SEK

Swedish krona

8,8339

CHF

Swiss franc

1,2167

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,3175

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

27,460

HUF

Hungarian forint

310,08

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

PLN

Polish zloty

4,1982

RON

Romanian leu

4,4915

TRY

Turkish lira

3,0910

AUD

Australian dollar

1,5269

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,5545

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

10,8026

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,6142

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,7615

KRW

South Korean won

1 488,77

ZAR

South African rand

14,9134

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

8,6212

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,6598

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

15 740,61

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,5667

PHP

Philippine peso

62,404

RUB

Russian rouble

49,9800

THB

Thai baht

44,754

BRL

Brazilian real

3,2493

MXN

Mexican peso

18,3039

INR

Indian rupee

84,7928

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
# C_2015126EN.01002401.xml

| 18.4.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 126/24 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.4.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 126/24

---

Corrigendum to Notice from the Government of the Hellenic Republic concerning Directive 94/22/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on the conditions for granting and using authorizations for the prospection, exploration and production of hydrocarbons

(
  Official Journal of the European Union C 400 of 13 November 2014
  )

Official Journal of the European Union C 400 of 13 November 2014

(2015/C 126/09)

On page 9:

for:

for:

‘Application Deadline is the first working day after six (6) calendar months from the date of publication of this Notice of the Call for Tenders in the Official Journal of the European Union.’,

read:

read:

‘Application Deadline is the first working day after eight (8) calendar months from the date of publication of this Notice of the Call for Tenders in the Official Journal of the European Union.’.

---
# C_2013080EN.01001301.xml

| 19.3.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 80/13 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.3.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 80/13

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

18 March 2013

2013/C 80/06

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,2929 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 122,88 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4547 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,85620 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 8,3370 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,2221 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 7,5015 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 25,620 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 307,17 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,7012 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,1565 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,4153 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,3466 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,2446 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,3211 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 10,0351 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,5686 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,6157 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 439,04 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 11,8662 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 8,0399 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,5875 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 12 557,23 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,0487 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 52,595 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 39,9180 |
| THB | Thai baht | 38,179 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 2,5697 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 16,1410 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 69,9780 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,2929

JPY

Japanese yen

122,88

DKK

Danish krone

7,4547

GBP

Pound sterling

0,85620

SEK

Swedish krona

8,3370

CHF

Swiss franc

1,2221

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

7,5015

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

25,620

HUF

Hungarian forint

307,17

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,7012

PLN

Polish zloty

4,1565

RON

Romanian leu

4,4153

TRY

Turkish lira

2,3466

AUD

Australian dollar

1,2446

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,3211

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

10,0351

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,5686

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,6157

KRW

South Korean won

1 439,04

ZAR

South African rand

11,8662

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

8,0399

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,5875

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

12 557,23

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,0487

PHP

Philippine peso

52,595

RUB

Russian rouble

39,9180

THB

Thai baht

38,179

BRL

Brazilian real

2,5697

MXN

Mexican peso

16,1410

INR

Indian rupee

69,9780

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
# C_2014084EN.01000101.xml

| 22.3.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 84/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.3.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 84/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.7023 — Publicis/Omnicom)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2014/C 84/01

On 9 January 2014, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32014M7023. EUR-Lex is the online access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32014M7023. EUR-Lex is the online access to the European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
# C_2013252EN.01000202.xml

| 31.8.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 252/2 |
| --------- | -- | -------------------------------------- | ------- |

---

Decisions adopted by the Court of Justice at its General Meeting on 9 July 2013

2013/C 252/03

At its meeting on 9 July 2013, the Court decided to assign Mr Rodin to the First and Sixth Chambers.

In consequence, the composition of the First and Sixth Chambers is as follows.

| | First Chamber
Mr Tizzano, President of the Chamber. Ms Berger, Messrs Borg Barthet, Levits, Kasel and Rodin, Judges. | | Mr Tizzano, President of the Chamber. | | Ms Berger, Messrs Borg Barthet, Levits, Kasel and Rodin, Judges. |
| | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | | ------------------------------------- | | ---------------------------------------------------------------- |
| | Mr Tizzano, President of the Chamber. | | | | |
| | Ms Berger, Messrs Borg Barthet, Levits, Kasel and Rodin, Judges. | | | | |

| | Sixth Chamber
Ms Berger, President of the Chamber, Messrs Borg Barthet, Levits, Kasel and Rodin, Judges. | | Ms Berger, President of the Chamber, | | Messrs Borg Barthet, Levits, Kasel and Rodin, Judges. |
| | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | | ------------------------------------ | | ----------------------------------------------------- |
| | Ms Berger, President of the Chamber, | | | | |
| | Messrs Borg Barthet, Levits, Kasel and Rodin, Judges. | | | | |

---
[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________ No. 16

- 13582 Non

- Argument Calendar

________________________ D.C. Docket No. 4:15

- cr
- 10014

- JEM

- 1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff

- Appellee,

versus DANIEL MICHAEL SZABO,
Defendant

- Appellant.

________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida

________________________ (January 9, 2017) Before WILLIAM PRYOR , JULIE CARNES and JILL PRYOR , Circuit Judge s. PER CURIAM: Daniel Szabo appeals h is sentence of 27 months of imprisonment for failing

to obey an order from the Coast Guard to heave to his vessel

. 18 U.S.C.

Case: 16-13582 Date Filed: 01/09/2017 Page: 1 of 32 § 2237(a)(1). Szabo argues that his sentence i s procedurally unreasonable because
the district court de nied his request for a two

- level reduction of his offense level
for acceptance of responsibility. See United States Sentencing Guidelines Manual § 3E1.1(a) (Nov. 2015) . We affirm. The district court did not clearly err by finding that Szab o had not accept ed responsibility for his offense . Szabo offered to plead guilty to failing to heave to his vessel , but in so doing h e refused to recognize th at his conduct was unlawful , to express any “remorse or contrition” for his wrongdoing , s ee United States v. Rodriguez , 959 F.2d 193, 195 (11th Cir. 1992) , or to disclose all of the misdeeds for which he was accountable, see U.S.S.G. § 3E1.1 cmt. n.1(A)

. Szabo repeatedly disregard ed marine officers’ orders to heave to and endanger ed them and other
boaters . Szabo, who was inebriated , led the officers on a high

- speed chase through populated waterways ; fired his gun multiple times at the officers ; sped toward their
vessel while daring them to veer away ; rammed their vessel with his ding hy ; insulted the officers by calling them “water pigs” ; and boasted that he could not be caught unless sh o t in the forehead

. Eventually, Szabo collided with the Coast
Guard vessel . The officers arrested Szabo after subduing him with pepper spray.
Szabo testi fied and disavow ed virtually any memory of the incident . The district court, which enjoyed “a unique position to evaluate” Szabo, discredited his testimony

. S ee U.S.S.G. § 3E1.1 cmt. n.5

. “ [W] e are [not] left with the definite and

Case: 16-13582 Date Filed: 01/09/2017 Page: 2 of 33 firm conviction that a mistake has been committed ” by deny ing Szabo a reduction for acceptance of respon sibility

. S ee Crystal Entm’ t & Filmworks, Inc. v. Jurado , 643 F.3d 1313, 1320 (11th Cir. 2011) (internal quotation marks and citation omitted). Szabo’s sentence is procedur ally reasonable.
We AFFIRM Szabo’s sentence. Case: 16-13582 Date Filed: 01/09/2017 Page: 3 of 3
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1


                             CERTIFICATION PURSUANT
                            TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, each of the undersigned officers of Phoenix Footwear
Group, Inc., (the "Company"), does hereby certify with respect to the Annual
Report of the Company on Form 10-K for the year ended December 27, 2003, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "10-K Report"), that:

      (1)   the 10-K Report fully complies with the requirements of Sections
            13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
            and

      (2)   the information contained in the 10-K Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.

      The undersigned have executed this Certification effective as of March 26,
2004.

                                /s/ JIM R REIDMAN
                        -----------------------------------
                                  Jim R. Riedman
                        Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

                                /s/ KENNETH WOLF
                        -----------------------------------
                                   Kenneth Wolf
                        Chief Financial Officer & Treasurer

A signed original of this Certification has been provided to Phoenix Footwear
Group, Inc. and will be retained by Phoenix Footwear Group, Inc. and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
II 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 1896 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to extend the new markets 

tax credit and provide designated allocations for areas impacted by a 

decline in manufacturing. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 7, 2014 

Mr. BROWN introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to extend 

the new markets tax credit and provide designated allocations for areas impacted by a decline in manufacturing. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Manufacturing Com5 munities Investment Act’’. 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 1896 IS

1 SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF NEW MARKETS TAX CREDIT WITH 

2 DESIGNATED ALLOCATIONS FOR AREAS IM3 PACTED BY DECLINE IN MANUFACTURING. 

4 (a) EXTENSION OF CREDIT.—Section 45D(f)(1) of 

5 the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by striking 

6 the period at the end of subparagraph (G) and inserting 

7 ‘‘, and’’ and by adding at the end the following new sub8 paragraph: 

9 ‘‘(H) $5,000,000,000 for 2014, 2015, and 

10 2016.’’. 

11 (b) ALLOCATIONS DESIGNATED FOR AREAS IM12 PACTED BY DECLINE IN MANUFACTURING.—Section 

13 45D(f) of such Code is amended by adding at the end the 

14 following new paragraph: 

15 ‘‘(4) ALLOCATIONS FOR AREAS IMPACTED BY

16 DECLINE IN MANUFACTURING.—The new markets 

17 tax credit limitation otherwise determined under 

18 paragraph (1) for calendar years 2014, 2015, and 

19 2016 shall each be increased by $1,000,000,000. A 

20 qualified community development entity shall be eli21 gible for an allocation under paragraph (2) of the in22 crease described in the preceding sentence only if a 

23 significant mission of such entity is providing invest24 ments and services to persons in the trade or busi25 ness of manufacturing products in communities 

26 which have suffered major manufacturing job losses 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 1896 IS

1 or a major manufacturing job loss event, as des2 ignated by the Secretary. Paragraph (3) shall be ap3 plied separately with respect to the increase provided 

4 under this paragraph.’’. 

5 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

6 this section shall apply to calendar years beginning after 

7 December 31, 2013. 

Æ 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
#### Vincent WOODS, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 73-490.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Oct. 30, 1973.

Rehearing Denied Dec. 11, 1973.

Phillip A. Hubbart, Public Defender and Lewis S. Kinder, Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen. and Stephen V. Rosin, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appel-lee.

' Before BARKDULL, C. J., and PEARSON and HAVERFIELD, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

The appellant was found guilty by a jury of robbery. On this appeal he asserts error upon the admission into evidence of a police report. Appellant concedes that a portion of the police report was admissible into evidence because it was admitted at his request in order that he might cross-examine a police officer as to the officer’s credibility. Appellant urges, however, in his initial point on appeal, that only the first page of the four page report should have been admitted into evidence. The trial court ruled that the report should be considered as a unit, and thereafter appellant cross-examined from the entire report. This point does not demonstrate prejudicial error because appellant, having sought to impeach a witness upon the basis of statements contained in the report, cannot later object to the admission of the report upon the ground that it contains hearsay statements. See Cox v. State, Fla.App.1969, 219 So.2d 762. Cf. Morey v. State, 72 Fla. 45, 72 So. 490 (1916).

Appellant has presented two additional points. One point alleges that improper remarks were voiced by the state attorney in his closing argument. A second point claims prejudice in the use of certain photographs submitted to the victim for identification purposes prior to appellant’s arrest. The record does not support appellant’s claim of prejudice on either of these points. Reversible error has not been shown.

Affirmed.