alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
U.S. flag
              An official website of the United States government Skip to main content   end of header Census.gov Newsroom Releases Governments
 Newsroom Archive
 Skip left menu navigation
 About the Newsroom
 				Facts for Features
 				**News Releases**
 				Press Kits
 				Tip Sheets
 Release Information CB11-TPS.08 **Contact:**
 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:  TUESDAY, MARCH 29, 2011 2010 4th Quarter Summary of State and Local Government Tax Revenue Tax revenues grew in the fourth quarter, marking the fifth straight quarter of positive growth. Corporate income tax revenue, general sales tax revenue and individual income tax revenue increased, while property tax revenue declined. The decline in property tax revenue is the first decline since the first quarter of 2010. This summary shows quarterly tax revenue data on property, sales, license, income and other taxes. Data are shown for individual state governments as well as national-level estimates of total state and local taxes, including 12-month calculations. This quarterly survey has been conducted continuously since 1962. Internet address: <https://www.census.gov/govs/qtax/>. **No news release associated with this report. Tip Sheet only.**
  CONNECT WITH US

Information Quality
                    Data Linkage Infrastructure
                    Data Protection and Privacy Policy
                    Accessibility      
                    FOIA
                    Inspector General
                    No FEAR Act
                    U.S. Department of Commerce
                    USA.gov
                   Measuring America's People, Places, and Economy
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              SEP-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 OCT-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                          5,640,000
<SECURITIES>                                            0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   4,238,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (401,000)
<INVENTORY>                                     1,289,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               11,205,000
<PP&E>                                          3,390,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (2,196,000)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 12,447,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           3,713,000
<BONDS>                                                 0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                   0
<PREFERRED>                                             0
<COMMON>                                       21,453,000
<OTHER-SE>                                    (12,719,000)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   12,447,000
<SALES>                                         4,133,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                4,133,000
<CGS>                                           1,746,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                           0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                2,297,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   90,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 53,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   143,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                        1,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               142,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                         0
<CHANGES>                                               0
<NET-INCOME>                                      142,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                           0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0.02
        


</TABLE>
#### STATE of Florida, Appellant, v. J. P. MORGAN, Jr., Appellee.

No. 70-246.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Oct. 28, 1970.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
Affirmed an d Memorandum Opinion filed October 27 , 2011

.

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________ NO. 14

- 1 0

- 00 839

- CR

____________ LIONEL JAMES BARRETT , Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 339th District Court

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 1233841



### MEMORANDUM OPINION
Appellant entered a plea of guilty to failure to register as a sex offender . On August 17, 2010 , the trial cour t sentenced a ppellant to confinement for 30 years in the Institutional Division of the Texas Dep artment of Criminal Justice . Appellant filed a timely notice of appeal.
Appellant ’ s appointed counsel filed a brief in which s he concludes the appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit. The brief meets the requirement s of Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396 (1967), by presenting a professional evaluation of2

the record and demonstrating why there are no arguable grounds to be advanced. See High v. State , 573 S.W.2d 807 (Tex. Crim. App. 1978).
A copy of counsel ’ s brief was delivered to appellant. Appellant was advised of the right to examine the appellate record and file a pro se response. See Stafford v. State
, 813 S.W.2d 503, 510 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991). As of this date, more than forty

- five days has passed and no pro se response has been filed.
We have carefully reviewed the record and counsel ’ s brief and agree the appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit. Further, we find no reversible error in the record

. We are not to address the merits of each claim raised in an Anders brief or a pro se response when we have determined there are no arguable grounds for review. See Bledsoe v. State
, 178 S.W.3d 824, 82 7

– 28 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005).
Accordingly, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Hedges and Justices Anderson and Christopher. Do Not Publish

— T ex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-7444

ROBERT EDWARD LEE SHELL, Plaintiff - Appellant,

v. CHARLES PRUITT; WILLIAM MASSELLO, III, Doctor, Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Glen E. Conrad, District Judge. (7:09-cv-00278-gec-mfu)

Submitted: January 14, 2010 Decided: January 21, 2010

Before MOTZ, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Robert Edward Lee Shell, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Robert Edward Lee Shell appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Shell v. Pruitt , No. 7:09-cv-00278-gec-mfu (W.D. Va. July 15, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
#### John LUCYSZYN, Appellant, v. Teodore LUCYSZYN and Anna Lucyszyn, Appellees.

No. 1913.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Fourth District.

Sept. 13, 1968.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Broward County; Jose A. Gonzalez, Jr., Judge.

Appeal dismissed.
**Exhibit 31.1****Certification**I, Gregg L. Engles, certify that:1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Dean Holding Company; 2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, result ofoperations and cash flows of Dean Holding Company as of, and for the periods presented in thisreport; 4. Dean Holding Company’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for Dean Holding Company and have: a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to Dean Holding Company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known tous by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report isbeing prepared;  b. Evaluated the effectiveness of Dean Holding Company’s disclosure controls and proceduresand presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and  c. Disclosed in this report any change in Dean Holding Company’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during Dean Holding Company’s most recent fiscal quarter(Dean Holding Company’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, Dean Holding Company’sinternal control over financial reporting; and5. Dean Holding Company’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to Dean Holding Company’sauditors and the audit committee of Dean Holding Company’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions): a. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectDean Holding Company’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and  b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who havea significant role in Dean Holding Company’s internal control over financial reporting./s/ Gregg L. Engles
# C_2013270EN.01000301.xml

| 19.9.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 270/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.9.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 270/3

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

18 September 2013

2013/C 270/02

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,3352 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 132,18 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4579 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,83580 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 8,6263 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,2370 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 7,8915 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 25,813 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 298,47 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,7026 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,2328 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,4715 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,6704 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,4281 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,3762 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 10,3530 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,6242 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,6805 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 443,31 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 13,1304 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 8,1730 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,6078 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 14 803,24 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,3186 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 57,946 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 43,1380 |
| THB | Thai baht | 42,272 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 3,0067 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 17,2742 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 84,7180 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,3352

JPY

Japanese yen

132,18

DKK

Danish krone

7,4579

GBP

Pound sterling

0,83580

SEK

Swedish krona

8,6263

CHF

Swiss franc

1,2370

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

7,8915

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

25,813

HUF

Hungarian forint

298,47

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,7026

PLN

Polish zloty

4,2328

RON

Romanian leu

4,4715

TRY

Turkish lira

2,6704

AUD

Australian dollar

1,4281

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,3762

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

10,3530

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,6242

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,6805

KRW

South Korean won

1 443,31

ZAR

South African rand

13,1304

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

8,1730

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,6078

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

14 803,24

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,3186

PHP

Philippine peso

57,946

RUB

Russian rouble

43,1380

THB

Thai baht

42,272

BRL

Brazilian real

3,0067

MXN

Mexican peso

17,2742

INR

Indian rupee

84,7180

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
# Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

August 6, 2015

N o. 04

- 14

- 00263

- CV

In the Interest of H.O. , a Child,

From the 408th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2012

- EM5

- 01553

Honorable Karen H. Pozza, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

Sitting: Karen Angelini, Justice

Marialyn Barnard, Justice

Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

The panel has considered appellant’s motion for rehearing, and the motion is DENIED.

_________________________________ Karen Angelini, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I h ave hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 6th day of August, 2015

.

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
June 10, 2015 

 

Mr. Leif Murray 

3707 N County Road 1050W 

Fairbanks, IN 47849 

Dear Mr. Murray: 

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your request for an exemption. It 

explains why we can not process your request and what you should do in the next 30 days. 

Why We Can Not Process Your Request 

We entered your May 19, 2015, exemption request into the public docket (No. FAA-2015-

1781), but we are unable to process your request any further. The information you sent does 

not comply with the requirements of § 11.81 (copy enclosed). For us to consider the request 

any further, you must send us all of the following: 

 The specific section or sections of 14 CFR from which you seek relief, the extent of the 

relief you seek, and the reason you seek relief. 

 The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, how it would 

benefit the public as a whole. 

 Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your request. 

What You Should Do 

If you want us to process your request any further, you must send the information described 

earlier to reach us within 30 days. Please note that § 11.63(d) requires you to send your 

petition for exemption at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption. 
2 

If We Do Not Hear From You 

If we do not hear from you within 30 days, we will close the docket without notifying you 

further. If you have any questions or require additional time, you may call (202) 267-9677. 

Sincerely, 

/s/ 

Brenda Robeson 

Program Analyst, Airmen and 

 Airspace Rules Division 

Enclosure
260 La. 127

#### Mrs. Alma DICKERSON v. BARNARD & BURK INDUSTRIAL CORPORATION et al.

No. 51952.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Dec. 13, 1971.

In re: Alma Dickerson applying for certiorari or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, Parish of East Baton Rouge. 253 So.2d 574.

It is ordered that the writ of review issue; that the Court of Appeal send up the record in duplicate of the case; and that counsel for plaintiff and defendant be notified.
EXHIBIT 23.1





CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM





To the Board of Directors


Crown Crafts, Inc. and Subsidiaries:





We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements No. 33-64499 and No. 333-136868 on Form S-8 of Crown Crafts, Inc. and subsidiaries of our report dated June 13, 2011, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of Crown Crafts, Inc. and subsidiaries as of April 3, 2011 and March 28, 2010, and the related consolidated statements of income, shareholders’ equity and cash flows for the years then ended, and the related financial statement schedule, which report appears in the April 3, 2011 annual report on Form 10-K of Crown Crafts, Inc. and subsidiaries.





/s/ KPMG LLP





Baton Rouge, Louisiana


June 13, 2011
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. 

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit ______________________ 

WYOMING SAWMILLS, INC.,

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

v. 

UNITED STATES, 

Defendant-Appellee. 

____________________ 

2010-5160 

______________________

 

 Appeal from the United States Court of Federal 

Claims in No. 07-CV-861, Judge Susan G. Braden. 

______________________ 

JUDGMENT 

______________________ 

JULIE A. WEIS, Haglund Kelley Horngren Jones & 

Wilder, LLP of Portland, Oregon, argued for plaintiffappellant. 

L. MISHA PREHEIM, Attorney, Commercial Litigation 

Branch, Civil Division, United States Department of 

Justice, of Washington, DC, argued for defendantappellee. With him on the brief were TONY WEST, 

Assistant Attorney General, JEANNE E. DAVIDSON, 

Director, and BRYANT G. SNEE, Deputy Director. Of 

counsel on the brief was JOSHUA SCHNELL, Office of 

General Counsel, United States Department of 

Agriculture, of Washington, DC. 

______________________ 
THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is 

ORDERED and ADJUDGED: 

 PER CURIAM (GAJARSA, SCHALL, and PROST, Circuit 

Judges). 

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36. 

 ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

 April 20, 2011 /s/ Jan Horbaly

 Date Jan Horbaly 

 Clerk
# C_2014234EN.01000301.xml

| 19.7.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 234/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.7.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 234/3

---

Information on infringement procedure 2013/4108

2014/C 234/03

The European Commission wishes to inform the complainants concerned that infringement procedure 2013/4108 on access to the profession of draughtsman (‘delineante’) in Spain was closed on 10 July 2014.

delineante

---
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3133 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3133

To authorize the Secretary of Transportation to issue a certificate of 
   documentation with appropriate endorsement for employment in the 
      coastwise trade of the United States for the vessel ELISSA.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 27, 1993

  Mr. Brooks introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
               Committee on Merchant Marine and Fisheries

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To authorize the Secretary of Transportation to issue a certificate of 
   documentation with appropriate endorsement for employment in the 
      coastwise trade of the United States for the vessel ELISSA.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled, That notwithstanding 
section 27 of the Merchant Marine Act, 1920 (46 App. U.S.C. 883), the 
Act of June 19, 1886 (46 App. U.S.C. 289), and section 12106 of title 
46, United States Code, the Secretary of Transportation may issue a 
certificate of documentation with appropriate endorsement for 
employment in the coastwise trade of the United States for the vessel 
ELISSA (United States official number 697285).

                                 <all>
```
# C_2013222EN.01000701.xml

| 2.8.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 222/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.8.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 222/7

---

Interest rate applied by the European Central Bank to its main refinancing operations (1):

1

0,50 % on 1 August 2013

Euro exchange rates (2)

2

1 August 2013

2013/C 222/05

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,3236 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 130,69 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4551 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,86920 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 8,6914 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,2317 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 7,8345 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 25,955 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 298,83 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,7029 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,2346 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,4230 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,5635 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,4733 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,3630 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 10,2656 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,6662 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,6836 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 486,41 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 13,0772 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 8,1142 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,5190 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 13 606,09 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,2918 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 57,740 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 43,7150 |
| THB | Thai baht | 41,402 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 3,0087 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 16,8653 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 80,0030 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,3236

JPY

Japanese yen

130,69

DKK

Danish krone

7,4551

GBP

Pound sterling

0,86920

SEK

Swedish krona

8,6914

CHF

Swiss franc

1,2317

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

7,8345

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

25,955

HUF

Hungarian forint

298,83

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,7029

PLN

Polish zloty

4,2346

RON

Romanian leu

4,4230

TRY

Turkish lira

2,5635

AUD

Australian dollar

1,4733

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,3630

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

10,2656

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,6662

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,6836

KRW

South Korean won

1 486,41

ZAR

South African rand

13,0772

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

8,1142

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,5190

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

13 606,09

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,2918

PHP

Philippine peso

57,740

RUB

Russian rouble

43,7150

THB

Thai baht

41,402

BRL

Brazilian real

3,0087

MXN

Mexican peso

16,8653

INR

Indian rupee

80,0030

---

(1)  Rate applied to the most recent operation carried out before the indicated day. In the case of a variable rate tender, the interest rate is the marginal rate.

1

(2)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

2

Source:

---