alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3. NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T RO BERT C. K O N O P, A p p e lla n t, a nd OF F I C I AL C OMMI T T E E OF U N SECU RED CRED I TO RS, C re di t or, v. H A W A I I A N A I R L I N E S , I N C ., R e or ga ni i z e d D e bt or- C hapt e r11 B a nkrupt c yC a s e N o. 03- 00817, A pp el l ee , a nd J OS HU A G OT B AU M a n d OF F I C E OF THE U. S. TR USTE E, T ru st ees. N o. 08- 16128 D. C. No . 1 : 0 7 - c v - 0 0 2 2 3 - DA EB MK ME MOR AN DU M * 

# FI LED OC T 27 2010 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALST he pa ne l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l a r g u m e n t. See F ed . R . A p p . P . 3 4 (a )( 2 ). A cc o rd in g ly, K o n o p ’s m o tio n to h a v e o r a l a r g u m e n t h e ldin P a s a d e n a , C a lif o rn ia , is d e n ie d . 08- 16128 2 A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt

f o rth e D is tr ic t o f

H a w a ii D a vi d A . E z r a , D i s tr i c tJ udge , P r e s i di ng S ubm i tt e d O c t obe r19, 2010 ** B e f o r e : O ’S C A N N L A I N , T A L L M A N , a n dB E A , C ir c u it J u d g e s . R obe rtC . K onop appe a l s pr o s e f r om the di s tr i c tc ourt ’ s j udgm e nta f f i rm i ng the ba nkrupt c yc ourt ’ s or de rde ny i ng K onop’ s m ot i on t o a m e nd orc l a r i f yhi s pr oof of c l a i m . W e ha ve j ur i s di c t i on unde r28 U . S . C . §158( d) . W e r e vi e w de c i s i ons of th e b an k ru p tcy c o u rt in d ep en d en tl y w ith o u t d ef er en ce to th e d istrict co u rt’s d e te rm in a tio n s . L ei ch t

y v. N ea ry ( I n r e Str and) , 37 5 F . 3d85 4, 85 7 (9th C i r. 20 04 ). W e a f f i rm. T he ba nkrupt c yc ourtdi d notc l e a r l ye rrbyf i ndi ng tha tK onop’ s pr oof of cl ai m di d n oti ncl ud e are qu es tfor e qu i t abl e r el i ef because the cl ai m sum m ary f o c u s e d o n m o n e taryd a m a g e s a n din c lu d e do n lyas in g le , p a s t- te n s e r e f e r e n c e to e q u itab le r e lie f

. Se e A rr ow E le c tr oni c s , I nc . v . J us tus ( I n r e Kay pr o) , 218 F . 3d 1070, 1073 ( 9th C i r . 2000) ( ba nkrupt c yc ourt ’ s f i ndi ngs of

f a c ta r e r e vi e w e d f

or c l e a re rr or ) . F urthe r , the ba nkrupt c yc ourtdi d notabus e i t s di s c r e t i on byde ny i ng08- 16128 3 K o n o p ’s m o tio n to a m e n d th e p r o o f o f c la im a s u n tim e ly . See R ob er t s Farm s I

nc. v. B u l tm a n (In re R o b ert s Fa rm s) , 9 8 0 F .2 d1 2 4 8 , 1 2 5 1 ( 9 th C ir . 1 9 9 2 ) . K on op ’ s r em ai ni ng cont ent i on s are un pers uasi ve. K o n o p ’s r e q u e s t f

o rju d ic ia l n o tic e is d e n ie d . AF F I RME D.
#### Roger NOBLE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1200.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Fourth District.

Feb. 7, 1967.

Appeal from Court of Record, Broward County; John G. Ferris, Judge.

Appeal quashed.
## COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02

- 18

- 00277

- CR

Joseph Rauch

v.

The State of Texas §

§

§

§

§ From the 16th District Court

of Denton County (F16

- 1107

- 16)

August 23, 2018

Per Curiam

(nfp)



### JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that

the appeal should be dismissed. It is ordered that the appeal is dismissed for

want of jurisdiction.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

PER CURIAM
#### CONRAD v. LARSON.

No. 36760.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Feb. 1968.

Certiorari denied without opinion. 207 So.2d 529.
### Swanson , Bria n (OST) boT - nc^T - l£3t>t > - Lg'^'=^. ^ From : Devany , Denni s (OST ) Sent : Tuesday , Januar y18 , 2011 8:0 7 A M To : Swanson , Bria n (OST ) Subject : FW : Kalaupap a EA S subsid y-^ ^

C O -^5'^-'3: : From : valeri e monso n fmailtoivaleriemonson@yahoo.com ] ^ ._ ^ Sent : jvionday , January17 , 201 1 9:4 0 Pi^I J ? S^ ^ To : Devany , Denni s (OST ) u j Subject : Kalaupap a EA S subsid y° ~ C O Aloh aMr . DeVany , I amwritin g i n support

o f a n Essentia l Ai r

Servic e subsid y bein g grante dt o a n ai r carrie r servin g Kalaupapa , Hawaii . I bega n flyin g t o Kalaupap a2 2 year s ag o fro mmy hom e o n Mau i an dhav e man y friend s stil l livin g ther e an dman y friend s whos e grave s I lik e t o visit . A s yo u probabl y know , th e onl y way t o reac h Kalaupap ao n th e groun di s b y way o f mul e o r walkin g dow n a stee p clif f trail . Mos t

peopl e arriv e o n th e smal l airplane s tha t fl y i n an dou t

o f Kalapuap aafew time s aday . I woul ddefinitel y visi t

Kalaupap amor e ofte n i

f fare s wer e lower . Th e EA S subsid y woul dallo w th e peopl e o f Kalaupap at o hav e mor e flexibility i n bein g abl e t o trave l t o othe r island s t o visi t

famil y o r conduc t othe r busines s an dals o allo w thei r familie s an dfriend s t o visi t the ma t Kalaupap amor e often . I hop e an EA S subsid y wil l b e grante dt o an ai r carrie r wit h astron g recor do f

servic e i n Hawaii . Respectfully , Valeri e Monso n 17 5 Kealalo aAvenu e Makawao , Hawai i 9676 8
# CA2013204EN.01000201.xml

| 18.7.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CA 204/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.7.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CA 204/2

---

RESERVE LIST (1)

1

OPEN COMPETITION

EPSO/AST/121/12

CONFERENCE TECHNICIANS (AST 3)

(2013/C 204 A/02)

| AUTIN | Arnaud |
| --- | --- |
| BOTTARO | Mauro |
| BOGHE | Peter |
| COLAS | Charles |
| CONIAC | Catalin-Mihai |
| COPPENS | Johan |
| DE CASTRO | Sonia |
| DELRONCHE | Etienne |
| DELSO LUCAS | Patricia Maria |
| D'HELFT | Jeroen |
| DIONIS MARTI | Pascual |
| FILIPIC | Maksimiljan |
| GANGOLF | Boris |
| GEVERS | Olivier |
| KAUCKY | Pavel |
| MURRAY | Paul |
| MUSIC | Emir |
| OVAERT | Jean Philippe |
| PIERARD | Vincent |
| SAIDI | Zoheir |
| SANCHEZ RODRIGUEZ | Jose Maria |
| VALLDEORIOLA | Sandra |
| VAN DE VELDE | Maarten |
| WALTHER | Bernard |

AUTIN

Arnaud

BOTTARO

Mauro

BOGHE

Peter

COLAS

Charles

CONIAC

Catalin-Mihai

COPPENS

Johan

DE CASTRO

Sonia

DELRONCHE

Etienne

DELSO LUCAS

Patricia Maria

D'HELFT

Jeroen

DIONIS MARTI

Pascual

FILIPIC

Maksimiljan

GANGOLF

Boris

GEVERS

Olivier

KAUCKY

Pavel

MURRAY

Paul

MUSIC

Emir

OVAERT

Jean Philippe

PIERARD

Vincent

SAIDI

Zoheir

SANCHEZ RODRIGUEZ

Jose Maria

VALLDEORIOLA

Sandra

VAN DE VELDE

Maarten

WALTHER

Bernard

The reserve list will be valid until 7 June 2016.

7 June 2016

---

(1)  A successful candidate may explicitly request her/his name not be published.

1

---
Exhibit
32


CERTIFICATIONS








Certification
of CEO and CFO Pursuant to 18  U.S.C. Section 1350








The
undersigned, Bernhard Steiner and Ann B. Ruple, in their capacities as Chief
Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, respectively, of Clean Diesel
Technologies, Inc. (the “Registrant”) do each hereby certify with respect to the
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Registrant for the period ended June 30,
2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the “Report”), that, to the best of his or her knowledge:





(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant as of, and
for, the periods presented in this Report.








/s/  Bernhard
    SteinerBernhard
      SteinerPresident,
      Chief Executive Officer and DirectorAugust
      11, 2008/s/  Ann B. RupleAnn
      B. RupleChief
      Financial Officer, Vice President and TreasurerAugust
      11, 2008





Pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (the “Act”), this certification
accompanies the Report and shall not, except to the extent required by the Act,
be deemed filed by Registrant for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
by Section 906, has been provided to Clean Diesel Technologies, Inc. and will be
retained by Clean Diesel Technologies, Inc. and will be furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### Raymond William DRISCOLL, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 70-765.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Aug. 20, 1971.

Appeal from Court of Record, Broward County; Humes T. Lasher, Judge.

Appeal dismissed.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-575
In Re: JOHN H. LEA, JR., Petitioner.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. Submitted: January 23, 1997 Decided: January 31, 1997 Before RUSSELL, WILKINS, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. John H. Lea, Jr., Petitioner Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: John H. Lea, Jr., a federal prisoner, brought this petition for writ of mandamus alleging that the district court had unduly delayed acting on a matter pending before it. Lea alleges that hefiled a 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1994) motion in the United States District Court, Eastern District of Virginia, Alexandria Division in December 1994. Lea did not submit any portion of the district courtrecord to aid in understanding the matter set forth in the petition. See Fed. R. App. P. 21(a). The Alexandria Division of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia has no record of any pending actions involving Lea before it, nor does it have any record of any action filed in December 1994. We therefore deny the petition. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AS OF SEPTEMBER 30, 1997 AND THE RELATED CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENT OF INCOME FOR THE YEAR THEN ENDED AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                          53,257
<SECURITIES>                                     2,426
<RECEIVABLES>                                  108,004
<ALLOWANCES>                                       197
<INVENTORY>                                     20,955
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               200,228
<PP&E>                                         107,463
<DEPRECIATION>                                  67,353
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 282,282
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           91,992
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              234
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     175,086
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   282,282
<SALES>                                        388,154
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               394,385
<CGS>                                          296,991
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  296,991
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                76,766
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,837
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 18,791
<INCOME-TAX>                                     6,598
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             12,193
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    12,193
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.36
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.36
        

</TABLE>
**UN PUBLISHED** 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 10** 
**- 1301** 

CARLOS EDWARD MARTIN ,
Plaintiff

- Appellant ,
and

TASHIANA ANITA MARTIN ,
Plaintiff ,

v.
LEON LOTT, as Representative for the Office of the Richmond County Sh eriff’ s Department; DEPUTY BEN FIELDS, in his individual capacity as deputy w ith the Richland County Sheriff’ s Department; DEPUTY JOSEPH CLARK, in his individual capacity as deputy w ith the Richland County Sheriff’ s Department ,
Defendants

- Appellees

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina , at Columbia

. Joseph F. Anderson, Jr. , District Judge. ( 3:07

- cv
- 03782

- JFA )

Submitted : December 30, 2010 Decided: January 1 8 , 2011

Before WILKINSON and WYNN , Circu it Judges , and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge

.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.2 Carlos Edward Martin, Appellant Pro Se. William Henry Davidson, II, Robert David Garfield, Kristy Markay Grafton, Andrew Lindemann, DAVIDSON & LINDEMANN, PA, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.3 PER CURIAM:

Carlos E dward Martin appeals the district court’s
order granting summary judgment in part to defendant s on his 42

U.S.C. § 1983 (2006 ) complaint. We have reviewed the record and
find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the
reasons stated by the district court. Martin v. Lott , No. 3:07

-

cv
- 03782

- JFA (D.S.C. Feb. 9 , 2010). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts an d legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would

not aid the decisional process
.

AFFIRMED
<PAGE>



                                                            Exhibit 6 to Annual
                                                            Report On Form 10-K
                                                            For the Year Ended
                                                            December 31, 1995




                                        April 14, 1995



Mr. Melvyn C. Goldstein
c/o Del Laboratories, Inc.
565 Broad Hollow Road
Farmingdale, New York  11735

Dear Mr. Goldstein:

     This will confirm that your Employment Agreement, as amended and extended,
is further extended to March 31, 1998.

     In all other respects the Employment Agreement, as amended and extended,
shall continue in full force and effect.

     Please signify your agreement with the foregoing by counter-signing the
copy of this letter and returning it to me.

                                        Very truly yours,

                                        DEL LABORATORIES, INC.



                                        By:/s/ Dan K. Wassong
                                           ----------------------
                                           Dan K. Wassong
                                           Chairman of the Board

ACCEPTED AND AGREED:



/s/ Melvyn C. Goldstein
-----------------------
Melvyn C. Goldstein
# C_2013142EN.01000101.xml

| 22.5.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 142/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.5.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 142/1

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

20 May 2013

2013/C 142/01

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,2853 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 131,86 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4528 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,8456 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 8,5754 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,246 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 7,5143 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 26,121 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 289,99 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,6997 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,1821 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,3473 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,3736 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,314 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,3212 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 9,9766 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,576 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,6132 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 437,99 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 12,1601 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,8903 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,571 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 12 548,08 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 3,8739 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 52,982 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 40,268 |
| THB | Thai baht | 38,315 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 2,6134 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 15,8305 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 70,801 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,2853

JPY

Japanese yen

131,86

DKK

Danish krone

7,4528

GBP

Pound sterling

0,8456

SEK

Swedish krona

8,5754

CHF

Swiss franc

1,246

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

7,5143

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

26,121

HUF

Hungarian forint

289,99

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,6997

PLN

Polish zloty

4,1821

RON

Romanian leu

4,3473

TRY

Turkish lira

2,3736

AUD

Australian dollar

1,314

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,3212

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

9,9766

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,576

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,6132

KRW

South Korean won

1 437,99

ZAR

South African rand

12,1601

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,8903

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,571

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

12 548,08

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

3,8739

PHP

Philippine peso

52,982

RUB

Russian rouble

40,268

THB

Thai baht

38,315

BRL

Brazilian real

2,6134

MXN

Mexican peso

15,8305

INR

Indian rupee

70,801

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE

F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

O RDER

Appellate case name: Kaylen Dewayne Simmons v. The State of Texas

Appellate case number: 01

- 13

- 00930

- CR

Trial court case number: 12

- CR

- 2519

Trial court: 212th District Court of Galve ston County

Appellant has filed a “Motion to Recall Mandate” because he has filed a Petition for Writ

of Certiorari with the Supreme Court of the United States. The motion is granted . This Court

orders that the Clerk of the Court withdraw the mandate is sued on April 10, 2015.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Rebeca Huddle

 Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Date: May 5, 2015
561 S.E.2d 754

#### Lars James HANSON, Appellant, v. COMMONWEALTH of Virginia, Appellee.

Record No. 1311-97-4.

Court of Appeals of Virginia.

April 2, 2002.

In accordance with the order of the Supreme Court of Virginia entered on November 2, 2001, the opinion previously rendered by this Court on January 26, 1999 is withdrawn, the mandate entered on that date is vacated and this matter is remanded to the trial court for a new sentencing hearing. This Court’s order entered on March 8, 1999 is also vacated.

This order shall be published and certified to the trial court.
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 10**  **- 7723** 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

– Appellee ,
v. LEROY ONON SMOOT , Defendant

- Appellant
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District o f South Carolina , at Florence
. R. Bryan Harwell , District Judge. ( 4:06

- cr - 01034

- RBH

- 1; 4:10

- cv - 70236

- RBH )

Submitted : April 21, 2011 Decided: April 26, 2011

Before WILKINSON, GREGORY, an d DUNCAN , Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by un published per cur iam opinion
. Leroy Onon Smoot, Appellant Pro Se. Jeffrey Mikell Johnson, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Leroy Onon Smoot seeks to appeal the district court’s order dismissing as untimely his 28 U.S.C. A. § 2255 (West Supp. 2010) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2006) . A certificat e of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006)
. When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasona ble jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller

- El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336

- 38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack , 529 U.S. at 484

- 85. We have independently reviewed th e record and conclude that Smoot has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materi als3 before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process. DISMISSED
# C_2013299EN.01000101.xml

| 15.10.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 299/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.10.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 299/1

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

14 October 2013

2013/C 299/01

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,3564 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 133,19 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4589 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,84830 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 8,7988 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,2334 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,1325 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 25,560 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 295,70 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,7028 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,1828 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,4618 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,6929 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,4313 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4041 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 10,5179 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,6228 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,6886 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 454,56 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 13,4792 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 8,2830 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,6165 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 14 812,70 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,3150 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 58,442 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 43,7873 |
| THB | Thai baht | 42,462 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 2,9507 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 17,6773 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 83,3290 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,3564

JPY

Japanese yen

133,19

DKK

Danish krone

7,4589

GBP

Pound sterling

0,84830

SEK

Swedish krona

8,7988

CHF

Swiss franc

1,2334

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,1325

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

25,560

HUF

Hungarian forint

295,70

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,7028

PLN

Polish zloty

4,1828

RON

Romanian leu

4,4618

TRY

Turkish lira

2,6929

AUD

Australian dollar

1,4313

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4041

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

10,5179

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,6228

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,6886

KRW

South Korean won

1 454,56

ZAR

South African rand

13,4792

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

8,2830

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,6165

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

14 812,70

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,3150

PHP

Philippine peso

58,442

RUB

Russian rouble

43,7873

THB

Thai baht

42,462

BRL

Brazilian real

2,9507

MXN

Mexican peso

17,6773

INR

Indian rupee

83,3290

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---