alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2014077EN.01000201.xml

| 15.3.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 77/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.3.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 77/2

---

Notice for the attention of the persons and entity subject to the restrictive measures provided for in Council Decision 2011/235/CFSP and in Council Regulation (EU) No 359/2011 concerning restrictive measures directed against certain persons, entities and bodies in view of the situation in Iran

2014/C 77/02

The following information is brought to the attention of the persons and entity that appear in the Annex to Council Decision 2011/235/CFSP (1) and in Annex I to Council Regulation (EU) No 359/2011 (2) concerning restrictive measures directed against certain persons, entities and bodies in view of the situation in Iran. The grounds for listing of those persons appear in the relevant entries in those Annexes.

1

2

The persons and entity concerned may submit a request to the Council, together with supporting documentation, that the decision to include them on the abovementioned lists should be reconsidered, before 1 April 2014, to the following address:

| Council of the European Union |
| --- |
| General Secretariat |
| DG C 1C |
| Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175 |
| 1048 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |
| E-mail: sanctions@consilium.europa.eu |

Council of the European Union

General Secretariat

DG C 1C

Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175

1048 Bruxelles/Brussel

BELGIQUE/BELGIË

E-mail: sanctions@consilium.europa.eu

Any observations received will be taken into account for the purpose of the Council's periodic review, in accordance with Article 12(4) of Regulation (EU) No 359/2011, of the list of designated persons and entities.

---

(1)  OJ L 100, 14.4.2011, p. 51.

1

(2)  OJ L 100, 14.4.2011, p. 1.

2

---
Exhibit 32.2

Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as

Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Digital Realty Trust, Inc. (the Company) hereby certifies, to
such officers knowledge, that:

(i) the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period ended
September 30, 2010 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates and for the periods indicated.

Dated: November 9, 2010



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/    A. WILLIAM STEIN
|A. William Stein       
|Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant to Securities and Exchange Commission Release 33-8238, dated June 5, 2003, this certification is being furnished and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or incorporated by reference in any registration statement of the Company filed under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.
Table 4.  Estimates of the Total Housing Inventory for the
                United States:  Third Quarter 2005 and 2006

(Estimates are in thousands and may not add to total, due to rounding)


                                    Third     Third    90-Percent
                                   quarter   quarter   Confidence Interval(+) 2006
Type                                 2005      2006    of 2006       of       Percent
                                   estimate  estimate  estimate  difference  of total

All housing units.................  124,119   126,225       (X)        (X)       100

  Occupied........................  108,431   109,629       317        288        87
    Owner occupied................   74,588    75,646       628        430        60
    Renter occupied...............   33,843    33,984       537        415        27

  Vacant..........................   15,688    16,595       359        316        13
    Year-round vacant.............   11,854    12,606       353        301        10
      For rent....................    3,773     3,808       173        193         3
      For sale only...............    1,481     1,935       105        125         2
      Rented or sold,
      awaiting occupancy..........    1,191     1,159        74        106         1
      Held off market.............    5,409     5,704       245        210         5
        For occasional use........    1,799     1,850       142        122         1
        Temporarily occupied
        by persons with
        usual residence elsewhere.    1,020     1,121       111         94         1
        For other reasons.........    2,590     2,733       172        147         2

    Seasonal vacant...............    3,834     3,989       229        199         3
    aA 90-percent confidence interval is a measure of an estimate's reliability.  The larger the confidence interval is, in relation to the size of the
          estimate, the less reliable the estimate.
         (X)  Not Applicable.  Since the number of housing units is set equal to an independent national measure, there is no sampling error,
         and hence no confidence interval.
NOTE:  Since first quarter 2003, the Current Population Survey/Housing Vacancy Survey (CPS/HVS) estimates have been controlled to independent
            housing unit counts.  Doing so should make the CPS/HVS estimate of housing units more  comparable to other Census Bureau housing surveys.
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 3241

To assure that advertisements by States for participation in their lotteries

are subject to regulation by the Federal Trade Commission.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

OCTOBER 7, 1993

Mr. MCCRERY introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Energy and Commerce

A BILL

To assure that advertisements by States for participation

in their lotteries are subject to regulation by the Federal

Trade Commission.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. LOTTERY ADVERTISEMENTS.

4 The advertisements by States to encourage participa5 tion in lotteries administered by the States are subject to

6 the regulations of the Federal Trade Commission respect7 ing unfair and deceptive acts or practices under section

8 5 of the Federal Trade Commission Act.

Æ
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     Article 5 of Regulation S-X
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000027984
<NAME>                        The Deltona Corporation
<MULTIPLIER>                  1,000
<CURRENCY>                    U.S. dollars

<S>                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                 12-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>             DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                JAN-1-1999
<PERIOD-END>                  DEC-31-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>               1
<CASH>                        548
<SECURITIES>                  0
<RECEIVABLES>                 2,448
<ALLOWANCES>                  (899)
<INVENTORY>                   8,307
<CURRENT-ASSETS>              911
<PP&E>                        1,948
<DEPRECIATION>                (1,458)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                11,913
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>         6,024
<BONDS>                       11,714
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>         0
<PREFERRED>                   0
<COMMON>                      13,544
<OTHER-SE>                    (21,748)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>  11,913
<SALES>                       8,339
<TOTAL-REVENUES>              8,837
<CGS>                         3,693
<TOTAL-COSTS>                 6,733
<OTHER-EXPENSES>              1,620
<LOSS-PROVISION>              0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>            851
<INCOME-PRETAX>               (367)
<INCOME-TAX>                  0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>           (367)
<DISCONTINUED>                0
<EXTRAORDINARY>               0
<CHANGES>                     0
<NET-INCOME>                  (367)
<EPS-BASIC>                   (.03)
<EPS-DILUTED>                 (.03)



</TABLE>
ex10a.htm
















Exhibit (10)(a)

















Consent of Ernst & Young LLP, Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm












We consent to the reference to our firm under the caption “Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm” in Post-Effective Amendment No. 5 to the 1933 Act Registration Statement (Form N-4 No. 333-193276) and Amendment No. 376 to the 1940 Act Registration Statement (Form N-4 No. 811-09763), and to the use therein of our reports dated (a) March 31, 2016, with respect to the financial statements of Lincoln Life & Annuity Company of New York and (b) April 12, 2016, with respect to the financial statements of Lincoln New York Account N for Variable Annuities for the interests in a separate account under individual flexible payment deferred variable annuity contracts.







/s/ Ernst & Young LLP














Philadelphia, Pennsylvania


November 16, 2016
# C_2014043EN.01000202.xml

| 14.2.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 43/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.2.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 43/2

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.6996 — Secop/ACC Austria)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2014/C 43/04

On 11 December 2013, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32013M6996. EUR-Lex is the online access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32013M6996. EUR-Lex is the online access to the European law.

---
ex10a.htm
















Exhibit (10)(a)

















Consent of Ernst & Young LLP, Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm












We consent to the reference to our firm under the caption “Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm” in Post-Effective Amendment No. 8 to the 1933 Act Registration Statement (Form N-4 No. 333-179107) and Amendment No. 148 to the 1940 Act Registration Statement (Form N-4 No. 811-03214), and to the use therein of our reports dated (a) March 31, 2016, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of The Lincoln National Life Insurance Company and (b) April 20, 2016, with respect to the financial statements of Lincoln National Variable Annuity Account C for the interests in a separate account under individual flexible payment deferred variable annuity contracts.












/s/ Ernst & Young LLP









Philadelphia, Pennsylvania


November 16, 2016
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 150 (Friday, August 3, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Page 38161]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-16667]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-4377-DR; Docket ID FEMA-2018-0001]


Texas; Amendment No. 1 to Notice of a Major Disaster Declaration

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice amends the notice of a major disaster declaration 
for the State of Texas (FEMA-4377-DR), dated July 6, 2018, and related 
determinations.

DATES: This amendment was issued July 19, 2018.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dean Webster, Office of Response and 
Recovery, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street SW, 
Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-2833.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that the incident 
period for this disaster is closed effective July 13, 2018.

(The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA) 
are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, Community 
Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis Counseling; 
97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034, Disaster Unemployment 
Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance Grant; 97.048, 
Disaster Housing Assistance to Individuals and Households In 
Presidentially Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049, Presidentially 
Declared Disaster Assistance--Disaster Housing Operations for 
Individuals and Households; 97.050 Presidentially Declared Disaster 
Assistance to Individuals and Households--Other Needs; 97.036, 
Disaster Grants--Public Assistance (Presidentially Declared 
Disasters); 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant.)


Brock Long,
Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.
[FR Doc. 2018-16667 Filed 8-2-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 9111-23-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                           3,076
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    3,526
<ALLOWANCES>                                       311
<INVENTORY>                                         25
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                12,108
<PP&E>                                           3,923
<DEPRECIATION>                                   2,520
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  13,787
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            4,606
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            40
<OTHER-SE>                                       9,072
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    13,787
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                26,424
<CGS>                                           19,237
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   23,488
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  40
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,896
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,207
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,689
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,689
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.42)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.40)


</TABLE>
### •H^fe,'-Cr: cb P:I^^E'R! ^ 

### '• ',.f i Vertica l Advantag e Helicopters



## DSTOFTOiSPORTm

, , :'^^^£': Z ,U;:M . V . !-:•;'•"?-^r-- - ;>- ; ,-.,,,„.,v..www.vaheU.coiT i ,':'V"'''-'n\':(C ' "/\"'*i : '3t)''" ' ••••""•'•••''• ' info@vaheli.co m -:lt.(. " T o Who m I tMa

yConcern : Thi s lette ri s a forma l reques tbyVertica l Advantag e Helicopters , LL C par t135 certificat e numbe r V5QA173 M fo ra n exemptio n t o a portio n o fth e require d FA Adru g an d alcoho l testin g requirements . Currently , FA

Aregulations , FA

R 91.14 7 an d 1 4 CFR par t12 0 stat e tha ta h operato ro fa par t91.14 7 sightseein g lette ro fauthorizatio n an d par t 135 ai rcarrie rcertificat e mus thav e a separat e dru g an d alcoho l testin g progra m fo rbot h certificates . I woul d lik e t o as k tha tYf e mayb e permitte d t o us e jus t on e approve d dru g an d alcoho l testin g progra m fo rbot h o fthes e operations . I believ e thi s v/oul d b e i n th e publi cinteres tan d no ti n an yv^a yjeopardi2 e safety . W e ar e a ver y smal l compan yvnt h onl y3 employees . Currently , v/e hav e al l thre e covere d employee s (tW o pilots , an d on e mechanic ) o n th e FA R par t91.14 7 lette ro fauthorization . O n th e par t135 ai rcarrie r certificat e v/e hav e on e o fthos e sam e pilot s an d th e sam e mechani cliste d as covere d employees . B y alloyin g Vertica l Advantag e Helicopters , LL C t o combin e thes e tw o dru g an d alcoho l testin g programs , al l covere d emplpyee s wil l remai n subjec tt o rando m dru g an d alcoho l testing . A s a smal l operator , bein g require d t o maintai n tw o separat e dru g an d alcoho l testin g program s t o provid e duplicat e testin g o fth e sam e employee s i s costl yfo rou rbusines s an d ineffident . Havin g tw o dru g an d alcoho l program s t o tes t th e sam e peopl e twic e doe s no ti n an ywa ymak e ou roperatio n safer . Allowin g u s t o merg e thes e tw o program s v/il l provid e cos tsaving s fo rou rbusiness , whil e stil t ensurin g tha tal l covere d employee s ar e subjec tt o rando m dru g an d alcoho l testing. : ''^'^ ! ^ ;' ! !' ' I than k you rver ymuc h fo ryou rattentio n i n thi s matter . I fyo u hav e an yfurthe rquestions , pileas e contac t m e a t513-746-7994 . tca n als o b e reache d byemai l a tinfo@vaheli.com .

Mat tRup e Directo ro fOperation s Vertica l Advantag e Helicopters , LL C

Vertica l Advantag e Helicopter s - 246 0 Greentre e Rd . - Lebanon , Olii o 4503 6 - 513.746.799 4 - www.vaheli.co m
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 326

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to make the exclusion for

amounts received under group legal services plans permanent.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JANUARY 5, 1993

Mr. RANGEL (for himself, Mr. SHAYS, and Mr. SCHUMER) introduced the

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

A BILL

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to make

the exclusion for amounts received under group legal

services plans permanent.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. PERMANENT EXTENSION OF EXCLUSION FOR

4 EMPLOYER-PROVIDED GROUP LEGAL SERV5 ICES PLANS.

6 (a) GENERAL RULE.—Section 120 of the Internal

7 Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by striking subsection

8 (e) (relating to termination) and by redesignating sub9 section (f) as subsection (e).
2

•HR 326 IH

1 (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—Subsection (a) of

2 section 104 of the Tax Extension Act of 1991 is amended

3 by striking paragraph (2).

4 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by

5 this section shall apply to taxable years beginning after

6 December 31, 1991.

Æ
#### Bobby Lee WHITE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. P-67.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Sept. 23, 1971.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
#### STATE v. Spencer C. CROSS et al.

No. 39373.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Feb. 1970.

Mandamus denied without opinion.
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk's Office, Atlanta, March 13, 2018. I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written. , Clerk. 

# Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA, March 13, 2018 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order A18D0323. DIANNE L. SIMMONS v. ROGER DALE SIMMONS. Upon consideration of the Application for Discretionary Appeal, it is ordered that it be hereby DENIED.
LC NUMBERS: 2015CA0251
**EXHIBIT 23.1**

 

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENTREGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

** **

We hereby consent to the incorporation byreference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (No. 333-103489,333-111997, 333-56438, 333-87223) and Form S-3 (333-116036) of Veritas DGCInc. of our report dated October 10, 2005 relating to the financialstatements, financial statement schedule, managements assessment of theeffectiveness of internal control over financial reporting and theeffectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, which appears in thisForm 10-K.

 

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

 

Houston, Texas

October 10, 2005

 

----
#### Michael Edward STOUDT, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. R-208.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Sept. 19, 1972.

Robert P. Miller, Public Defender, for appellant.

*363Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., and Raymond L. Marky, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appel-lee.

PER CURIAM.

The briefs and the record on appeal having been read and given full consideration, and appellant having failed to demonstrate reversible error, the judgment of the lower court hereby appealed is affirmed.

CARROLL, DONALD K., Acting C. J., and WIGGINTON and RAWLS, JJ., concur.
#### Henrietta FURMANIK, Appellant, v. NORTHEAST AIRLINES, INC., Appellee.

No. 71-1036.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

May 23, 1972.

Rehearing Denied June 12, 1972.

Sibley, Giblin, Levenson & Ward and Alan M. Glaser, Miami Beach, for appellant.

Patton, Kanner, Nadeau, Segal & Stobs, Miami, for appellee.

Before PEARSON and CHARLES CARROLL, JJ., and WILLIS, ROBERT E., Associate Judge.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, plaintiff, below, appeals from the entry of a summary judgment in favor of the defendant airline. The action was based on the death of two greyhound racing dogs; negligence and breach of contract were alleged.

Due to a delay in take off from the airport both dogs suffocated. They had been shipped, and appropriate payment made under a “no value declared” airbill. The plaintiff took the position that contracts relieving a carrier from liability caused by its negligence were void as a matter of public policy.

The defendant asserted that regardless of the question of negligence the tariff schedule limited the liability to a specified amount under the regulations of the Civil Aeronautics Board. With this we agree and affirm the entry of the summary judgment by the lower court.

It is our view that we are not dealing with the question of relieving the carrier from liability but with the question of whether the carrier’s liability may be limited by filed and approved tariff regulations.

> “Under the tariff provisions, it was plaintiff’s duty to declare the higher rate if she wished protection in excess of the limited amount. Vogelsang v. Delta Air Lines, Inc., 193 F.Supp. 613 (S.D.N.Y.1961), affirmed 302 F.2d 709 (2d Cir. 1962) ; Milhizer v. Riddle Airlines, Inc., [185 F.Supp. 110 (E. D. Mich., S.D. I960)]; Melnick v. National Air Lines, [189 Pa.Super. 316, 150 A.2d 566 (1959)]; Wilkes v. Braniff Airways, Inc. [288 P.2d 377 (Okl.1955)]; Jones v. Northwest Airlines, 22 Wash.2d 863, 157 P.2d 728 (1945); Radinsky v. Western Air Lines, Inc., 125 Colo. 286, 242 P.2d 815 (1952).” Eastern Air Lines v. Williams, 282 Ala. 421, 211 So.2d 912, 915 (1968).

> “Tariffs filed with the Civil Aeronautics Board, if valid, are conclusive and exclusive, and the rights and liabilities between airlines and their passengers are governed thereby.” Slick Airways, Inc. v. United States, 292 F.2d 515, 154 Ct.Cl. 417.

Affirmed.