alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
U.S. flag
              An official website of the United States government Skip to main content   end of header Census.gov Newsroom Releases Miscellaneous
 Newsroom Archive
 Skip left menu navigation
 About the Newsroom
 				Facts for Features
 				**News Releases**
 				Press Kits
 				Tip Sheets
 Release Information CB12-137 **Contact:**  Public Information Office
301-763-3030
 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:  WEDNESDAY, AUG. 1, 2012 RSVP Today: Media Advisory — Census Bureau to Host Webinar on All Products Have a Classification Number — Learn How to Find Yours What:
 The U.S. Census Bureau is the official source for U.S. export and import statistics and is responsible for issuing regulations governing the reporting of all export shipments from the United States. In this third webinar in the eight-part series learn how to determine the correct classification for your product and what tools and resources are available to help you narrow your search. See complete series at: <https://www.census.gov/newsroom/releases/archives/news_conferences/webinars_exporting.html>. The event will consist of a simultaneous audio conference and online presentation. A question-and-answer session will follow the presentation. Please login early, as some setup is required.
 When:
 Wednesday, Aug. 8, 1 p.m. (EDT)
 Who:
 Mayumi Escalante, supervisor, Classification Area, Foreign Trade Division,
U.S. Census Bureau
 RSVP today:
 Sign up for webinar at:
    <https://www.mymeetings.com/emeet/rsvp/index.jsp?customHeader=mymeetings&Conference_ID=9124723&passcode=1354409>.			
To register for this event:
1. Go to the URL listed above and choose Web RSVP under Join Events.
2. Provide your information for the event leader and then click submit.
3. Registration closes one hour prior to event. **If closed captioning is required:** <http://livewrite.nccsite.com/view/cb0808>
 Follow @uscensusbureau on Twitter, Facebook, Flickr, YouTube and Ustream




CONNECT WITH US
 Information Quality
                    Data Linkage Infrastructure
                    Data Protection and Privacy Policy
                    Accessibility      
                    FOIA
                    Inspector General
                    No FEAR Act
                    U.S. Department of Commerce
                    USA.gov
  Measuring America's People, Places, and Economy
# C_2014233EN.01003001.xml

| 18.7.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 233/30 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.7.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 233/30

---

Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union

Cases where the Commission raises no objections

(Text with EEA relevance, except for products falling under Annex I of the Treaty)

2014/C 233/02

| Date of adoption of the decision | 18.12.2013 |
| --- | --- |
| Aid number | SA.37522 (2013/N) |
| Member State | Italy |
| Region | — | — |
| Title (and/or name of the beneficiary) | Non-productive investments N 52e/2010 |
| Legal basis | REGOLAMENTO (CE) n. 1698/2005
  REGOLAMENTO (CE) N. 1974/2006
  Misura 227 del PSR 2007 2013 della Regione Campania -CCI 2007IT06RPO019- originariamente approvato con Decisione n. C(2007)5712 del 20 novembre 2007 e nuovamente approvato con Decisione n. C(2012) 9747 del 19/12/2012
  Lettera Commissione SG (2010) D/7528 del 31/05/2010
  Legge regionale 11/96 |
| Type of measure | Scheme | — |
| Objective | Forestry |
| Form of aid | Direct grant |
| Budget | — |
| Intensity | 100 % |
| Duration (period) | 01.01.2014 — 31.12.2014 |
| Economic sectors | Forestry and logging |
| Name and address of the granting authority | Francesco Massaro |
| Regione Campania AdG PSR 2007-13 Centro Direzionale di Napoli- Isola A/6 80143 Napoli |

Date of adoption of the decision

18.12.2013

Aid number

SA.37522 (2013/N)

Member State

Italy

Region

—

—

Title (and/or name of the beneficiary)

Non-productive investments N 52e/2010

Legal basis

REGOLAMENTO (CE) n. 1698/2005

REGOLAMENTO (CE) N. 1974/2006

Misura 227 del PSR 2007 2013 della Regione Campania -CCI 2007IT06RPO019- originariamente approvato con Decisione n. C(2007)5712 del 20 novembre 2007 e nuovamente approvato con Decisione n. C(2012) 9747 del 19/12/2012

Lettera Commissione SG (2010) D/7528 del 31/05/2010

Legge regionale 11/96

Type of measure

Scheme

—

Objective

Forestry

Form of aid

Direct grant

Budget

—

Intensity

100 %

Duration (period)

01.01.2014 — 31.12.2014

Economic sectors

Forestry and logging

Name and address of the granting authority

Francesco Massaro

Regione Campania AdG PSR 2007-13 Centro Direzionale di Napoli- Isola A/6 80143 Napoli

Other information

—

The authentic text(s) of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found at:

http://ec.europa.eu/competition/elojade/isef/index.cfm.

---
#### STATE of Florida ex rel. DADE COUNTY OPTOMETRIC ASSOCIATION, Inc., Appellant, v. FAMILY OPTICAL SERVICE, Appellee.

No. 67-735.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Third District.

April 16, 1968.

Rehearing Denied May 8, 1968.

Fred A. Jones, Jr., Miami, for appellant.

David A. Graves, Miami, for appellee.

Before CHARLES CARROLL, C. J., and BARKDULL and SWANN, JJ.

SWANN, Judge.

This is an appeal from an order of the trial court which dismissed the plaintiff’s amended complaint with prejudice.

An examination of the amended complaint reveals that it did not contain sufficient allegations of a nuisance, as defined in Fla.Stat. § 823.05, F.S.A., as to entitle the plaintiff to bring this action pursuant to Fla.Stat. § 64.11, F.S.A. The alleged misleading advertising may not be enjoined as a nuisance by this plaintiff under the facts here alleged. See also Fla.Stat. §§ 817.46 and *463.19,*F.S.A.; Pompano Horse Club v. State, 93 Fla. 415, 111 So. 801, 52 A.L.R. 51 (1927).

Accordingly, the order of dismissal is hereby

Affirmed.
U.S. flag
              An official website of the United States government Skip to main content   end of header Census.gov Newsroom Releases 2010 Census
 Newsroom Archive
 Skip left menu navigation
 About the Newsroom
 				Facts for Features
 				**News Releases**
 				Press Kits
 				Tip Sheets
 Release Information CB11-CN.58 **Contact:**  Public Information Office
301-763-3030
 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:  TUESDAY, MARCH 1, 2011 Media Advisory — Census Bureau Ships Local 2010 Census Data to Delaware http://www2.census.gov/census_2010/01-Redistricting_File--PL_94-171/ http://factfinder2.census.gov The data will include summaries of population totals, as well as data on race, Hispanic origin and voting age for multiple geographies within the state, such as census blocks, tracts, voting districts, cities, counties and school districts. According to Public Law 94-171, the Census Bureau must provide redistricting data to the 50 states no later than April 1 of the year following the census. As a result, the Census Bureau is delivering the data state-by-state on a flow basis in February and March. All states will receive their data by April 1, 2011.
  https://www.census.gov/rdo http://2010.census.gov/news/press-kits/redistricting.html Please visit http://2010.census.gov/2010census/data/ for an interactive map showcasing county-level population change from 1960 to 2010, as well as state-level data on race and Hispanic or Latino origin for 2010. The widget will be updated as states are released and can be embedded on your website. Follow us on Twitter, Facebook, Flickr and YouTube (/uscensusbureau).
  CONNECT WITH US

Information Quality
                    Data Linkage Infrastructure
                    Data Protection and Privacy Policy
                    Accessibility      
                    FOIA
                    Inspector General
                    No FEAR Act
                    U.S. Department of Commerce
                    USA.gov
                   Measuring America's People, Places, and Economy
NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

CHRISTINE CORONA,

Plaintiff

- Appellant,

v. MICHELE VERDEROSA; et al.,

Defendants

- Appellees. No. 15

- 16163 D.C. No. 2:14

- cv - 01473

- MCE

- AC

MEMORANDUM *

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California Morrison C. England, Jr., District Judge, Presiding

Submitted October 25, 2016 **
Before: LEAVY, GRABER, and CHRISTEN , Circuit Judges. Christine Corona appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment dismissing her 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging d eprivation of her constitutional rights in connection with an arrest, search, and seizure . We have jurisdiction under
28 U. S.C. § 1291. We review de novo. Hebbe v. Pliler , 627 F.3d 338, 341

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 

# FILED

NOV 3 2016 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLER K U.S. COURT OF APPEAL S2 15

- 16163

(9th Cir. 2010) (dismissal for failure to state a claim under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6)); Olsen v. Idaho State Bd. of Med. , 363 F.3d 916, 922 (9th Cir. 2004) (dismissal on the basis of jud icial immunity )

. We affirm. The district court properly dismissed the claims against defendants Gatie, Jones, Vinson, and Montgomery because Corona failed to allege facts sufficient to state a plausible § 1983 claim. See Hebbe , 627 F.3d at 341

- 42 (though pro se pleadings are to be liberally construed, a plaintiff must still present factual allegations sufficient to state a plausible claim for relief) ; see also West v. Atkins , 487 U.S. 42, 48 (1988) (“To state a claim under § 1983, a plaintiff must allege the violation of a right secured by the Constitution and laws of the United States, and must show that the alleged deprivation was committed by a person acting under the color of state law.”)

. The district court properly dismissed the claims against defe ndant Judge
Verderosa on the ground that the judge was absolutely immune from civil liability,

s ee Schucker v. Rockwood , 846 F.2d 1202, 12 04 (9th Cir. 1988) ( judges are absolutely immune from damage actions taken within the jurisdiction of their

courts ) , a nd properly dismissed the claims against defendant Tweddell on the ground that she was entitled to quasi

- judicial immunity , see Curry v. Castillo (In re3 15

- 16163

Castillo) , 297 F.3d 940, 948 (9th Cir. 2002) (individuals who perform functions that are judicial in na ture, or have a sufficiently close nexus to the adjudicative process are entitled to a grant of quasi

- judicial immunity)

. Corona’s contention regarding alleged judicial bias is unpersuasive. We do not consider matters not specifically and distinctly raised and argued in the opening brief, or arguments and allegations raised for the first time on appeal. See Padgett v. Wright , 587 F.3d 983, 985 n.2 (9th Cir. 2009).
AFFIRMED.
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3197 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3197

 To redesignate the Post Office building located at 13th and Rockland 
 Streets in Reading, Pennsylvania, as the ``Gus Yatron Federal Postal 
                              Facility''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 30, 1993

Mr. Holden (for himself and Mr. Gilman) introduced the following bill; 
  which was referred to the Committee on Post Office and Civil Service

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To redesignate the Post Office building located at 13th and Rockland 
 Streets in Reading, Pennsylvania, as the ``Gus Yatron Federal Postal 
                              Facility''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REDESIGNATION.

    The Post Office building located at 13th and Rockland Streets in 
Reading, Pennsylvania, and known as the Reading General Mail Facility, 
shall be known and designated as the ``Gus Yatron Federal Postal 
Facility''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the Post Office building referred to in 
section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the Gus Yatron Federal 
Postal Facility.

                                 <all>
```
#### Gloria Delesdernier, wife of Paul MARCHAND, et al. v. ESTATE of Julia Loga, wife of George M. DELESDERNIER, et al. Succession of George W. DELESDERNIER. Succession of Mrs. Julia Theresa Loga, wife of George W. Delesdernier.

No. 60565.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Oct. 26, 1977.

In re: Paul Delesdernier, Succession of Ira Delesdernier, Sr. and Gael Keene Ralph applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, Parish of Plaquemines.

Writ denied.

DIXON, J.,

would grant.
AAM-12-122-E 

December 20, 2011 

 Exemption No. 10025A 

 Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2010-0243 

Mr. Anthony Mateer 

Director of Operations 

Kansas City Aviation Center, Inc. 

15325 S. Pflumm 

Olathe, KS 66062 

Dear Mr. Mateer: 

This letter is to inform you that we have granted your petition to extend Exemption 

No. 10025. It explains the basis for our decision, describes its effect, and lists the conditions 

and limitations. 

The Basis for Our Decision 

By letter dated December 3, 2011, you petitioned the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) 

on behalf of Kansas City Aviation Center, Inc. (Kansas City Aviation Center) for an 

extension of Exemption No. 10025. That exemption from part 120 of Title 14, Code of 

Federal Regulations (14 CFR) allows Kansas City Aviation Center, which is operating under 

separate parts of the regulation, to cover its safety-sensitive employees under one testing 

program. 

In your petition, you indicate that there has been no change in the conditions and reasons 

relative to public interest and safety that were the basis for granting the original exemption. 

The FAA has determined that good cause exists for not publishing a summary of the petition 

in the Federal Register because the requested extension of the exemption would not set a 

precedent, and any delay in acting on this petition would be detrimental to Kansas City 

Aviation Center. 
 2

Our Decision 

The FAA has determined that the justification for the issuance of Exemption No. 10025 

remains valid with respect to this exemption and is in the public interest. Therefore, under the 

authority provided by 49 U.S.C. 40113 and 44701, which the FAA Administrator has 

delegated to me, I grant your petition, subject to the conditions and limitations listed below. 

Conditions and Limitations 

1. Employees of Kansas City Aviation Center are subject to the drug and alcohol 

regulations at all times while conducting operations under part 135 or part 91. 

2. The drug and alcohol testing program must be implemented under the auspices of the 

Kansas City Aviation Center part 135 operation, not under part 91. 

The Effect of Our Decision 

Our decision extends the termination date of Exemption No. 10025 to March 31, 2014 unless 

sooner superseded or rescinded. This letter must be attached to, and is a part of, Exemption 

No. 10025. 

Sincerely, 

/s/ 

James R. Fraser, M.D. 

Deputy Federal Air Surgeon
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000830656
<NAME> BOSTON BIOMEDICA

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                         260,273
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                7,120,606
<ALLOWANCES>                                 (785,036)
<INVENTORY>                                  7,547,377
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            15,865,614
<PP&E>                                      14,337,246
<DEPRECIATION>                             (5,816,298)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              27,265,878
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       10,981,565
<BONDS>                                      2,541,104
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        56,145
<OTHER-SE>                                  13,282,869
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                27,265,878
<SALES>                                      6,136,942
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            14,584,721
<CGS>                                        3,018,033
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                9,540,064
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             6,193,058
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                60,398
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           (404,860)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,552,839)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   590,080
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (962,759)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (962,759)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.18)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.18)


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 10(mm)

[STATE OF                 STATE OF FLORIDA
 FLORIDA                  DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION
 SEAL]                    ------------------------------------------------------
                          Lawton Chiles                      Richard T. Farrell
                            Governor                              Secretary

Sharon J. Hummerhielm, Vice President
The Deltona Corporation
999 Brickell Avenue, Suite 700
Miami, Florida 33131

RE:  The Deltona Corporation - DE00009781
     Swan Development Corporation - DE00017867
     St. Augustine Shores, Units 2 and 7 - PRLE003175
     St. Augustine Shores, Unit 8 - PRLE003175
     Material Change No. MC00005348
     Bulk Sale/Co-Registration/Escrow Agreement

Dear Ms. Hummerhielm:

This letter is in response to the material change request number MC00005348.

As the Division understands the material change request submitted by The Deltona
Corporation  ("Deltona"),  Deltona will be conveying all of its  remianing  land
inventory  and  obligations  in  St.  Augustine   Shores   Subdivision  to  Swan
Development  Corporation  ("Swan").  Consequently,  Swan  will  need to become a
Co-Registrant.  The existing St.  Augustine  Shores  Improvement  Trust Account,
which holds  $14,909.66 as of 11/30/97,  will be replaced  with a St.  Augustine
Shores Refund Escrow  Agreement.  Swan has already placed $1,000,000 in a Refund
Escrow Account in the care of Five Points Title Services  Company,  Inc., acting
Escrow Agent.

The Division does hereby grant conceptual approval of MC00005348. Final approval
will be based upon receipt of all final and/or recorded documents.

THIS  APPROVAL  ONLY VERIFIES  YOUR  COMPLIANCE  WITH THE FILING AND  DISCLOSURE
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
REQUIREMENTS  OF CHAPTER 498,  FLORIDA  STATUTES,  AND DOES NOT  CONSTITUTE  THE
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DIVISION'S ENDORSEMENT OF THE OFFERING, DEVELOPMENT, OR ANY REPRESENTATIONS MADE
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ABOUT THE SUBJECT OF THIS FILING.  THIS APPROVAL DOES NOT RELIEVE THE REGISTRANT
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
OF ANY DUTY OR RESPONSIBILITY UNDER THE FLORIDA STATUTES,  THE RULES PROMULGATED
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
BY THE DIVISION THEREUNDER, OR ANY APPLICABLE LAW.
-------------------------------------------------


Examined by:                            Sincerely,




/s/ Manny J. Bas                        /s/ James F. Mullins, Chief
-----------------------------           ---------------------------
Financial Examiner/Analyst II           Bureau of Land Sales Regulation

JEM/MJB

         DIVISION OF FLORIDA LAND SALES, CONDOMINIUMS AND MOBILE HOMES
                       BUREAU OF LAND SALES REGISTRATION
 NORTHWOOD CENTRE * 1940 NORTH MONROE STREET * TALLAHASSEE, FLORIDA 32399-1034
                 Telephone (904) 488-1122 * Fax (904) 921-5450
REGULATORY EVALUATION

Directorate Identifier: 2012-NM-039-AD

Executive Order 12866:

Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action”?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:

Is the AD significant?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)

Regulatory Flexibility Act:

Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)

Intrastate Aviation in Alaska:

This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is it appropriate to include specific 

requirements for aircraft operated in Alaska, where aviation might be the only mode of 

transportation?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)
1

The Honorable Susan Webber Wright, United States District Judge for the

Eastern District of Arkansas, adopting the report and recommendations of the

Honorable H. David Young, United States Magistrate Judge for the Eastern District

of Arkansas. 

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 06-2759

___________

Charles Whited, *

*

Appellant, *

* Appeal for the United States

v. * District Court for the Eastern

* District of Arkansas.

Keith Waddle, Major, Disciplinary * [UNPUBLISHED]

Hearing Officer, Cummins Unit, ADC; *

R. Gaylon Lay, Warden, Cummins *

Unit, ADC; James Gibson, Hearing *

Officer Administrator, Arkansas *

Department of Correction, *

*

Appellees. *

___________

Submitted: April 25, 2007

Filed: May 3, 2007 

___________

Before WOLLMAN, MURPHY, and BYE, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Arkansas prisoner Charles Whited appeals the district court’s1

 preservice

dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint, in which he alleged that prison officials
-2-

violated his due process rights by wrongly confining him to punitive isolation for

fifteen days after he failed to report to work on the hoe squad. Upon de novo review,

see Cooper v. Schriro, 189 F.3d 781, 783 (8th Cir. 1999) (per curiam), we agree with

the district court that Whited failed to state a due process claim related to his

disciplinary sanction. See Sandin v. Conner, 515 U.S. 472, 483-86 (1995) (finding

30 days in disciplinary segregation did not work “major disruption” in inmate’s

environment because it did not exceed similar confinement in either duration or

degree of restriction); cf. Wilkinson v. Austin, 545 U.S. 209, 213, 223-24 (2005)

(finding atypical and significant hardship at supermax prison where, in addition to

conditions similar to most in solitary confinement, placement is indefinite, is reviewed

only annually after initial 30-day review, and disqualifies otherwise eligible inmate

for parole consideration). Moreover, any due process violations committed during the

disciplinary hearing were cured by the subsequent reversal of the disciplinary

conviction. See Wycoff v. Nichols, 94 F.3d 1187, 1189 (8th Cir. 1996) (reversal of

disciplinary case against prisoner constituted part of due process prisoner received,

and it cured alleged due process violation based on initial decision to sanction

prisoner). 

The judgment is affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

______________________________