alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

**WRITTEN STATEMENT**

**PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

In connection with Annual Report of Comtech Group, Inc. and itssubsidiaries (the “Company”) on Form l0-K for the period ended December 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, Hope Ni, Chief Financial Officer ofthe Company certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13a-14(b) or 15d-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

Dated: March 16, 2006
26.5

15.1

71.2

28.8

20.7

15.5

11.9

28.2

0 50 

Equally veteran/nonveteran

Nonveteran

Veteran

Equally minority/nonminority

Nonminority

Minority

Equally male-/female-owned

Men-owned

Women-owned

All firms

Percent of respondent firms that are family-owned

Family-Owned Businesses for Selected Ownership Gro

(Total reporting firms: 

13,706,504)

(Total reporting firms: 

3,691,571)

(Total reporting firms: 

7,353,153)

(Total reporting firms: 

2,661,780)

(Total reporting firms: 

2,082,125)

(Total reporting firms: 

11,404,174)

(Total reporting firms: 

220,206)

(Total reporting firms: 

1,312,416)

(Total reporting firms: 

11,665,475)

(Total reporting firms: 

728,613)

Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 2007 Survey of Business Owners – Released June 14, 2011

Equally men-/women-owned
# C_2014014EN.01001001.xml

| 18.1.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 14/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.1.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 14/10

---

Special Report No 15/2013 ‘Has the “Environment” component of the LIFE programme been effective?’

2014/C 14/09

The European Court of Auditors hereby informs you that Special Report No 15/2013 ‘Has the “Environment” component of the LIFE programme been effective?’ has just been published.

The report can be accessed for consultation or downloading on the European Court of Auditors' website: http://eca.europa.eu

A hard copy version of the report may be obtained free of charge on request to the Court of Auditors:

| European Court of Auditors |
| --- |
| Unit ‘Audit: Production of Reports’ |
| 12, rue Alcide de Gasperi |
| 1615 Luxembourg |
| LUXEMBOURG |
| Tel. +352 4398-1 |
| E-mail: eca-info@eca.europa.eu |

European Court of Auditors

Unit ‘Audit: Production of Reports’

12, rue Alcide de Gasperi

1615 Luxembourg

LUXEMBOURG

Tel. +352 4398-1

E-mail: eca-info@eca.europa.eu

or by filling in an electronic order form on EU-Bookshop.

---
Exhibit 23





Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm





We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements (Form S-8 No.s 333-134779, 333-89994, 33-59564, 333-87534, 333-81163, 333-80971, 333-118504) of The Dixie Group, Inc. of our reports dated March 5, 2007 with respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedule of The Dixie Group, Inc.,  The Dixie Group, Inc. managements assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of  The Dixie Group, Inc. included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 30, 2006.



/s/ Ernst & Young LLP



Atlanta, Georgia

March 5, 2007
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     This  schedule  contains  summary  financial   information  extracted  from
financial  statements for the three month period ended May 31, 1995 and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000027850
<NAME>                        MARITIME TRANSPORT & TECHNOLOGY, INC.
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                     $
       
<S>                                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              May-31-1995
<PERIOD-START>                                 Mar-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                                   May-31-1995
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                         0
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  0
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               0
<PP&E>                                         0
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          0
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   0
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               0
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                0
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            0
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   0
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  .00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  .00
        



</TABLE>
<PAGE>
                                                                      EXHIBIT 24

                               POWER OF ATTORNEY


     The undersigned Directors of PHOENIX FOOTWEAR GROUP, INC. do hereby
constitute and appoint James R. Riedman and Greg A. Tunney their true and lawful
attorneys and agents, to execute the Phoenix Footwear Group, Inc. Annual Report
on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2002, for us and in our
names as Directors, to comply with the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the
rules, regulations and requirements of the Securities and Exchange Commission in
connection therewith.


Dated:  March 28, 2003                  /s/ Edward Bloomberg
                                        ------------------------
                                        Edward Bloomberg


Dated:  March 28, 2003                  /s/ Steven DePerrior
                                        ------------------------
                                        Steven DePerrior


Dated:  March 28, 2003                  /s/ Gregory Harden
                                        ------------------------
                                        Gregory Harden


Dated:  March 28, 2003                  /s/ James R. Riedman
                                        ------------------------
                                        James R. Riedman


Dated:  March 28, 2003                  /s/ Wilhelm Pfander
                                        ------------------------
                                        Wilhelm Pfander


Dated:  March 28, 2003                  /s/ Gary E. Pflugfelder
                                        ------------------------
                                        Gary E. Pflugfelder


Dated:  March 28, 2003                  Greg A. Tunney
                                        ------------------------
                                        Greg A. Tunney
**EXHIBIT 32.1**
**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.SECTION 1350,****as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**
     In connection with the Form 10-K of DeanHolding Company (the “Company”) for the year endedDecember 31, 2003, as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the“Report”), I, Gregg L. Engles, Chief ExecutiveOfficer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 ofthe Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Report fully complieswith the requirements of Section 13(a) orSection 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, asamended, and the information contained in the Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Company.
 /s/ GREGG L. ENGLES      Gregg L. Engles     *Chief Executive Officer*
Date: March 30, 2004
Note: This certification accompanies the Reportpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002and shall not be deemed filed, except to the extent required bythe Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, by the Company for purposes ofSection 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, asamended.
EXHIBITS

                       APAC TELESERVICES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

           EXHIBIT (11) - STATEMENT RE:  COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE
                                     (Unaudited)

          <TABLE>
          <CAPTION>
                                                                                 Thirteen Weeks Ended
                                                                            March 29,             March 30, 
                                                                               1998                  1997
                                                                          (000's omitted, except per share data) 

                            <S>                                       <C>                     <C>               
                            Basic shares:
                             Average shares outstanding               48,810                  46,584

                             Net income                               $4,917                  $8,473

                             Net income per share                      $0.10                   $0.18



                            Diluted shares:
                             Average shares outstanding               48,810                  46,586
                             Net effect of dilutive stock
                              options - based upon the
                              treasury stock method using
                              quarter-end market price                   994                   1,415
                                Total shares                          49,804                  48,001
                                
                             Net income                               $4,917                  $8,473

                             Net income per share                      $0.10                   $0.18

                 </TABLE>
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA PR 07-0011

IN THE MATTER OF CALLINGA RETIRED DISTRICT JUDGETO ACTIVE SERVICE 

# FILED MAY 2 1 2020
Bowen Greenwood Clerk of Supreme Court State of Montana ORDER

The Honorable Luke Berger, Judge of the District Court for the Fifth Judicial District of the State of Montana, has requested the assistance ofretired District Judge Mike Salvagni to assume jurisdiction of Madison County Cause No. DR 2015-15, William J. Brennan v. TracyDannof/k/a/TracyS.Brennan. Judge Salvagni has retired under the provisions of the Montana Judges' Retirement System and,being subject to call for duty pursuant to § 19-5-103(a)and (b), MCA,has advised that he is agreeable to assisting the Fifth Judicial District Court with the above-listed matter. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: 1. The Honorable Mike Salvagni,retired District Judge,is hereby called to active service in the District Court of the Fifth Judicial District of the State of Montana, to assume judicial authority of Madison County Cause No. DR 2015-15, William J. Brennan v. Tracy Dannof/k/a/ Tracy S. Brennan, and is hereby authorized to proceed with any and all necessary hearings, opinions, and orders, including final resolution of said matter. 2. For all active service,Judge Salvagni shall be paid the salary compensation to which he is entitled by § 19-5-103(2)(b), MCA,and actual expenses, if any, shall be reimbursed. 3.A copy ofthis Order shall be filed with the Clerk ofCourt ofthe Fifth Judicial District,Madison County,with the request that this Order be sent to all counsel ofrecord in the above-listed matter. 05/21/2020

Case Number: PR 07-00114. A copy ofthis Order shall also be furnished to the Honorable Luke Berger,the

Honorable Mike Salvagni, and to Cathy Pennie, Office of the Supreme Court Administrator. This Order is entered by the ChiefJustice pursuant to Article VII, Section 6(3)of the 1972 Montana Constitution, and statutes enacted in conformity therewith and in implementation thereof. DATED this day ofMay,2020.

J" ChiefJustice

2
Co ^^^^-^p^'-vi^ViTC 

Adams, Kevin (OST) 

From: Robert Stanford Island Air [stanford@alaska.com] 

Sent: Tuesday, April 06, 2010 3:37 PM 

To: Adams, Kevin (OST) 

Subject: Island Air essential bid Karluk ; :' 

Kevin Adams 

Essential Air Service Division 

Office of Aviation Analysis 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE 

Washington, DC 20590 

Re: Essential Air Service at Karluk, AK Docket 2004-19342 

In regards to the letter of Servant Air dated March 18, 2010 Island Air would like to offer the 

following comments. 

1. Servant Air's Proposal to offer service to Karluk Alaska unsubsidized, and after bid 

closer wherein no bid was originally placed seems to be irresponsible and not in the 

best interest of the village of Karluk. Furthermore in their proposal they seem to 

foreshadow their intentions to again discontinue Karluk service. In their bid of 1 -11 -

2010 Mr. Cratty states (Servant Air retains its right to reduce service on 90-days notice if the 

service situation at Akhiok and Karluk changes.) It is clear to this carrier they have no 

intention of maintaining unsubsidized service and are only forcing a re-bid of the 

current contracts. 

2. Servant Air has filed for a new service to Larsen Bay Alaska with their current fleet of 

single engine aircraft to begin April 2, 2010. It seems confusing that if you have the 

aircraft to begin this service that you wouldn't have the ability to complete the last 11 

minutes of flying to the unsubsidized destination. Once again this shows their true 

intentions. 

The last time Servant Air was awarded the Karluk essential service contract Island Air 

was extended and required to cover for Servant Air's supposed inability to begin 

service. This is nothing more than a delay tactic in order to not have to operate in the 

more difficult winter months. Especially now that their bid guarantees a financial 

loss! We feel that if continual service has not been initiated within 60 days of their 

recent accident (March 15, 2010) that Servant Air should be disqualified for Karluk, 

Alaska. 

At present the Department has not issued any written order extending Island Air for 

Karluk Option One or Two in its more recent bid proposals. As Island Air is 
continuing to fly an Essential Service schedule into the village of Karluk we request at 

this time that an order be issued so as to apply our current billing. 

Robert G Stanford 

Island Air 

907-539-1182 

Smile4all7@comcast.net 

Stanford @ alaska.com
Exhibit 24
                              POWER OF ATTORNEY

      The undersigned, being a director of Detection Systems, Inc.
("Company"), hereby constitutes and appoints Karl H. Kostusiak, Frank J. Ryan
and David B. Lederer, or any of them, his true and lawful attorneys and
agents, each with full power and authority to act as such without the other,
to sign the name of the undersigned to the Company's fiscal 1998 Annual
Report on Form 10-K, and any amendments thereto, filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the
related rules and regulations thereunder, the undersigned hereby ratifying
and confirming all that said attorneys and agents, or any of them, shall do
or cause to be done by virtue hereof.

      IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has signed and delivered these
presents as of the date(s) shown below:

/s/ Donald R. Adair                       5/28/98
/s/ Mortimer B. Fuller III                6/2/98
/s/ David B. Lederer                      6/5/98
/s/ Edward C. McIrvine                    5/28/98
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA 

OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL, 

 Petitioner 

 v. 

JAMES ALLEN STEINER, 

 Respondent 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

No. 1965 Disciplinary Docket No. 3 

No. 103 DB 2013 

Attorney Registration No. 39650 

(Allegheny County) 

O R D E R 

PER CURIAM 

AND NOW, this 7th day of August, 2015, upon consideration of the Report and 

Recommendations of the Disciplinary Board dated June 18, 2015; it is hereby 

 ORDERED that James Allen Steiner is suspended from the Bar of this 

Commonwealth for a period of one year retroactive to December 16, 2013, and he shall 

comply with all the provisions of Pa.R.D.E. 217. 

 It is further ORDERED that Respondent shall pay costs to the Disciplinary Board 

pursuant to Pa.R.D.E. 208(g).
#### Charles A. MEANA, Appellant, v. ST. PETERSBURG KENNEL CLUB, INC., a Florida corporation, Appellee.

No. 72-273.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

June 6, 1973.

Rehearing Denied July 19, 1973.

*330L. C. Schowe of Riley, Schowe & Salts-man, St. Petersburg, for appellant.

John T. Allen, Jr. and Ross H. Stanton, Jr., of Harrison, Greene, Mann, Davenport, Rowe & Stanton, St. Petersburg, for appellee.

HOBSON, Judge.

Appellant was injured in a motorcycle accident on Gandy Boulevard at the entrance to the St. Petersburg Kennel Club. He brought a personal injury action against the Kennel Club for negligence of its employees in the operation of a manually controlled traffic light signal at the entrance. Upon trial the jury found that the Kennel Club was negligent and awarded appellant $200 damages. The uncontroverted amount of property damages, medical expenses and loss of earnings totaled $715. Appellant testified as to pain and suffering, impairment, sensitivity and loss of manual dexterity in his left hand. There was un-contradicted medical testimony that appellant had sustained five to ten per cent permanent impairment to his left hand.

Appellant moved for a new trial on the issue of damages only, and appellee tendered an additional amount of $515 to settle. The lower court ordered appellee to pay the special damages in the amount of $715, and denied the motion for new trial. No motion for new trial on the issue of liability was made, nor has. appellee filed a cross-assignment of error.

Although the jury was properly instructed as to pain and suffering and permanent injury, it clearly disregarded these instructions and failed to consider all of the elements of damages involved. Nor did the judgment of the trial judge cure the verdict by granting an additur to cover the special damages.

The jury’s verdict was grossly inadequate and legally inconsistent with the proof of the alleged injury. Griffis v. Hill, Fla.1969, 230 So.2d 143; Grossman v. Short, Fla.App.1970, 235 So.2d 11; Short v. Grossman, Fla.1971, 245 So.2d 217. It can only be concluded that the jury did not consider all the elements of damages involved; Pickel v. Rosen, Fla.App.1968, 214 So.2d 730; Anastasio v. Summersett, Fla.App.1969, 217 So.2d 854; Hancock v. Smith, Fla.App.1971, 248 So.2d 211.

Reversed and remanded with directions to grant appellant a new trial upon the issue of damages only.

Reversed and remanded with directions.

MANN, C. J., and McNULTY, J., concur. '
Rule 1921. Notice to the Chief Justice and to the Judicial Conduct Board

Whenever a judge receives notice that he or she is the subject of any federal or state 

criminal investigation or prosecution through a target letter, a subject letter, a 

presentment, an indictment, an arrest, a summons, a complaint, or by any other legal 

process, the judge must report the receipt of such notice in writing to the Chief Justice 

and to the Judicial Conduct Board within five (5) days.
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE

SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of Dionics, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-KSB for the period ended December 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), the undersigned certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of the undersigneds knowledge, that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



July 14, 2008                                        /s/ Bernard Kravitz

Dated:  _______________________ By:   _______________________________________

Bernard Kravitz,

President and Chief Executive Officer

(Principal Executive Officer)





July 14, 2008                                         /s/ Bernard Kravitz

Dated:  _______________________ By:   _______________________________________

Bernard Kravitz,

Principal Financial Officer
260 La. 1138

#### STATE of Louisiana ex rel. Preston PEBWORTH v. C. Murray HENDERSON, Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary, et al.

No. 52236.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

March 8, 1972.

In re: Preston Pebworth applying for writs of certiorari, mandamus and habeas corpus.

Writ denied. The showing made does not warrant the exercise of our original or supervisory jurdisdiction.
Martin, Michael (OST) 

From: Scott [scott.one@gmail.com] : \:..V;'^r':\-yrlrY.> 

Sent: Monday, February 06, 2012 9:55 AM ^''''^•''''•-iApJ?}-^-:^ 

To: EAS(OST) v:..;,i UFhHMi IUP; 

Subject: Selection of a newair carrier service in Presque Isle 

L! p !2- i' 

I wanted to offer my opinion as a small business owner in Northern Maine concerning the selection of a new air 

carrier at PQI under the EAS program. While both Peninsula Airways and Sovereign Air both offer proposals 

that meet the base requirements of providing non-stop service to BOS from PQI - only Sovereign Air actually 

makes a proposal to improve the route from its current state. Peninsula Airways would like to maintain service 

with a SAAB 340B aircraft which is currently the same plane being used by Colgan Air. While sufficient, it is 

not a very attractive aircraft to try and expand traffic to our regional hub. It's loud, uncomfortable (with limited 

space for taller passengers) and slow. On the other hand. Sovereign Air with proposal #1 is offering a more 

modem Domier 328JET which will lower round trip times, increase passenger comfort and offer an attractive 

quick hop for people traveling to and from BOS/PQI. 

Offering modem non-stop jet service would be a great step forward and an economic opportunity to make travel 

to this region more attractive. 

Scott
#### In re ESTATE of Minnie MERZ, Deceased. Lillian FARLEY, Petitioner, v. UNION TRUST NATIONAL BANK, Administrator C. T. A. of the Estate of Minnie Merz, Deceased, Respondent.

No. 43632.

Supreme Court of Florida.

May 21, 1973.

Certiorari denied. 273 So.2d 795.

CARLTON, C. J., and ROBERTS, ERVIN, ADKINS and DEKLE, JJ., concur.