alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# U ni te d S ta te s Co ur t of A pp ea ls For the Eig hth Circu it

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ _ No. 1 6- 43 85

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ _ Hen ry Est ua rd o Di az-Ga rci a,
ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll l Peti ti on er

,

v.
Je ffer so n B . Ses si on s, II I, Att or ne y Gene ral of t he Uni te d S ta te s,
ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll l Resp on de nt

.

__ __ __ __ __ __ Pet it io n fo r Rev ie w of a n Ord er o f th e Bo ard of I m

m ig rat io n Ap pe al s

__ __ __ __ __ __ Su bm it te d: Sep te m

be r 25 , 20 17 Fi le d: Octo be r 11 , 20 17 [Un pu bl is he d]

__ __ __ __ __ __ Befo re WOL LMAN, BOW MAN, an d C OLLOTO N, Circ ui t J ud ge s.

__ __ __ __ __ __ PER CURI AM.

Gua te m al an ci ti zen Hen ry Est ua rd o Diaz

- G a r c i a pe ti ti on s fo r rev ie w of an
or de r of th e Bo ard of Im

m ig rat io n App eal s di sm is si ng hi s ap pe al fro m th e d eci si on of an im m ig rat io n jud ge (IJ ), whi ch de ni ed hi m wit hh ol di ng of rem ov al an d rel ie fun de r th e Co nv en ti o n Aga in st Tort ur e (CAT). Diaz -Garc ia so ug ht im m ig rat io n 1 rel ie f ba se d on hi s reli gi on an d on hi s m em be rs hi p in th e pr op os ed pa rti cu la r so ci al gr ou p “ Gua te m al an s who ha ve reject ed ga ng recr ui tm en t as y ou th an d ha ve fle d th e
co un try an d can no t ret ur n.” Afte r care fu l co ns id erat io n, we co nc lu de th at su bs ta nt ia l

ev id en ce su pp or ts t h e d e n ia l of wit hh ol di ng rel ie f, be cau se : (1 ) Diaz -Garc ia ’s pr op os ed so ci al gr ou p is no t co g n i z a b le ; an d (2 ) th e reco rd do es no t co m pe l th e
co nc lu si on th at th e ga ng m em be rs who be at an d th reat en ed Diaz -Garc ia whe n he refu se d th ei r recr ui tm en t effo rts di d so fo r an y reas on ot he r th an to i n c r eas e th ei r
nu m be rs , r at he r th an o n a c c o u n t o f hi s rel ig io n or an y ot he r pr ot ect ed gr ou nd

. Se e De Ca st ro -Gu ti er re

z v. Hol de r , 71 3 F.3 d 37 5, 37 9- 80 (8 th Ci r

. 2 01 3) (s ta nd ard of

rev ie w; en um erat ed gr ou nd s fo r im m ig rat io n rel ie f); Ort iz -Pu e n t e s v

. Hol de r , 66 2 F.3 d 4 81 , 48 3- 84 (8t h C ir. 2 01 1)

.

W e fu rth er co nc lu de th at su bs ta nt ia l ev id en ce su pp or ts th e ag en cy ’s de ni al of CAT rel ie f, be cau se Diaz

- G arci a di d no t sh ow th at he was to rtu red , o r wou ld m or e li ke ly th an no t be to rtu red by th e Gua te m al an go ve rn m en t, or pe op le a c ti ng on th e go ve rn m en t’s be ha l f

, i f he ret ur ne d. Se e De Ca st ro -Gu ti er re z , 71 3 F.3 d at 38 1. Acco rd in gl y , th e p et it io n i s d en ie d. Se e 8t h C ir. R . 47 B.

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __

The IJ ’s de te rm in at io n th at Diaz -Garc ia ’s as y lu m cl ai m was ti m e-b arre d is no t 1 be fo re t hi s p an el

. -2

-
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3194 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3194

  To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide for inflation 
  adjustments to the income threshold amounts at which 85 percent of 
      social security benefits become includable in gross income.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 30, 1993

  Mr. Filner introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide for inflation 
  adjustments to the income threshold amounts at which 85 percent of 
      social security benefits become includable in gross income.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Equal Indexing for Seniors Act of 
1993''.

SEC. 2. INFLATION ADJUSTMENTS.

    (a) General Rule.--Subsection (c) of section 86 of the Internal 
Revenue Code of 1986 (as amended by the Revenue Reconciliation Act of 
1993) is amended by adding at the end thereof the following new 
paragraph:
            ``(3) Inflation adjustment to adjusted base amounts.--In 
        the case of any taxable year beginning in a calendar year after 
        1994, each dollar amount contained in paragraph (2) shall be 
        increased by an amount equal to--
                    ``(A) such dollar amount, multiplied by
                    ``(B) the cost-of-living adjustment determined 
                under section 1(f)(3) for the calendar year in which 
                the taxable year begins, by substituting `calendar year 
                1993' for `calendar year 1992'.
        If any increase determined under the preceding sentence is not 
        a multiple of $50, such increase shall be rounded to the next 
        lowest multiple of $50.''
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) shall 
apply to taxable years beginning after December 31, 1993.

                                 <all>
```
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 3042

To prohibit discrimination in contracting with potential contractors and subcontractors in federally funded construction projects on the basis of

certain labor relations policies of the potential contractors and subcontractors.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

SEPTEMBER 9, 1993

Mr. PAXON (for himself, Mr. BALLENGER, and Mr. RAMSTAD) introduced the

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Government Operations

A BILL

To prohibit discrimination in contracting with potential contractors and subcontractors in federally funded construction projects on the basis of certain labor relations policies of the potential contractors and subcontractors.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Federal Construction

5 Equity Act of 1993’’.
2

•HR 3042 IH

1 SEC. 2. CONSIDERATION OF CERTAIN LABOR RELATIONS

2 POLICIES OF OFFERORS ON CONSTRUCTION

3 CONTRACTS.

4 (a) PROHIBITION.—The Office of Federal Procure5 ment Policy Act (41 U.S.C. 401 et seq.) is amended by

6 adding at the end the following new section:

7 ‘‘PROHIBITION REGARDING CONSIDERATION OF CERTAIN

8 LABOR RELATIONS POLICIES OF OFFERORS ON CON9 STRUCTION CONTRACTS

10 ‘‘SEC. 29. (a) Notwithstanding any other provision

11 of law, no person may be denied a contract or subcontract

12 described in subsection (b), or participation in such a con13 tract or subcontract, in whole or in part on the basis of

14 that person’s policy regarding entering into or adhering

15 to a collective bargaining agreement or any similar agree16 ment.

17 ‘‘(b) Subsection (a) applies to a construction contract

18 entered into by an executive agency, a contract for any

19 other construction funded in whole or in part with funds

20 provided by the Federal Government, and any subcontract

21 under such a contract.

22 ‘‘(c) The Federal Acquisition Regulation shall include

23 provisions for the enforcement of the prohibition in sub24 section (a).

25 ‘‘(d) For the purposes of this section, the term ‘con26 struction’ includes rehabilitation, alteration, conversion,
3

•HR 3042 IH

1 extension, and repair of buildings, highways, or other im2 provements to real property.’’.

3 (b) DEFINITION.—Section 4 of such Act (41 U.S.C.

4 2302) is amended—

5 (1) by striking out ‘‘and’’ at the end of para6 graph (10);

7 (2) by striking out the period at the end of

8 paragraph (11) and inserting in lieu thereof ‘‘; and’’;

9 and

10 (3) by adding at the end the following new

11 paragraph:

12 ‘‘(12) The term ‘Federal Acquisition Regula13 tion’ means the Federal Acquisition Regulation is14 sued pursuant to section 25(c)(1).’’.

Æ
# C_2013177EN.01S00301.xml

| 22.6.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 177/s3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.6.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 177/s3

---

NOTICE

On 22 June 2013, in Official Journal of the European Union C 177 A, the ‘Common catalogue of varieties of vegetable species — fourth supplement to the 31st complete edition’ will be published.

Official Journal of the European Union

Subscribers to the Official Journal may obtain the same number of copies and language versions of this Official Journal as those to which they subscribe free of charge. They are requested to return the attached order form, duly completed and bearing their subscription registration number (code appearing on the left of each label and beginning with: O/...). This Official Journal will remain available free of charge for one year from the date of its publication.

Non-subscribers can order this Official Journal against payment from one of our sales offices (see http://publications.europa.eu/others/agents/index_en.htm).

This Official Journal — like all Official Journals (L, C, CA, CE) — can be consulted free of charge online at http://eur-lex.europa.eu

Image

---
# C_2014185EN.01003301.xml

| 17.6.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 185/33 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.6.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 185/33

---

Statement from the European Commission on Article 7(3) of the Joint Procurement Agreement to procure medical countermeasures pursuant to Decision No 1082/2013/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council

(2014/C 185/05)

The Joint Procurement Agreement to procure medical countermeasures aims to facilitate the coordination of practical matters relating to the joint purchasing activities it covers. It does not confer any competence or public law power in relation to public health to the Union or its institutions. Article 7(3) of the Agreement applies only to decision-making processes relating to the internal administrative governance of the joint procurement process itself. It is intended only to be used as a last resort where required to avoid situations of decisional blockage.

---
# C_2013256EN.01000101.xml

| 5.9.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 256/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.9.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 256/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.7001 — Carlyle/Klenk Holz)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2013/C 256/01

On 21 August 2013, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32013M7001. EUR-Lex is the online access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32013M7001. EUR-Lex is the online access to the European law.

---
<PAGE>

                                                                       Exhibit 5

                             [BLUESTONE LETTERHEAD]

                                                    September 11, 2000

Bluestone Software, Inc.
300 Stevens Drive
Philadelphia, PA 19113

          Re:  2000 Employee Stock Purchase Plan
               Registration Statement on Form S-8

Gentlemen:

                    I am the General Counsel for Bluestone Software, Inc., a
Delaware corporation (the "Company"), and have acted in such capacity in
connection with the registration under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended
(the "Act") of 600,000 shares of the Company's common stock, $0.001 par value
(the "Common Stock"), to be offered pursuant to the Company's 2000 Employee
Stock Purchase Plan (the "Plan") upon the terms and subject to the conditions
set forth in the Registration Statement on Form S-8 (the "Registration
Statement") relating thereto to be filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on September 11, 2000.

                    In connection therewith, I have examined originals or copies
certified or otherwise identified to my satisfaction of the Certificate of
Incorporation of the Company, the By-laws of the Company, the corporate
proceedings with respect to the offering of the shares and such other documents
and instruments as I have deemed necessary or appropriate for the expression of
the opinion contained herein.

                   I have assumed the authenticity and completeness of all
records, certificates and other instruments submitted to me as originals, the
conformity to original documents of all records, certificates and other
instruments submitted to me as copies, the authenticity and completeness of the
originals of those records, certificates and other instruments submitted to me
as copies and the correctness of all statements of fact contained in all
records, certificates and other instruments that I have examined.

                   Based on the foregoing, and giving due regard to such legal
considerations as I have deemed relevant, I am of the opinion that the shares of
Common Stock that may be issued by the Company pursuant to the Plan have been
duly and validly authorized for issuance and, when issued and paid for in
accordance with the Plan and the Registration Statement, and subject to the
Registration Statement becoming effective under the Act and to compliance with
such state securities rules, regulations and laws as may be applicable, will be
duly and validly issued, fully paid and nonassessable.

         I hereby consent to the filing of this opinion as an exhibit to the
Registration Statement.

                                            Very truly yours,

                                            /s/ PAUL T. PORRINI
                                            -----------------------------
                                            Paul T. Porrini
                                            Senior Vice President,
                                            General Counsel and Secretary
# C_2013376EN.01000101.xml

| 21.12.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 376/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.12.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 376/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.7101 — Brookfield Property/Starwood/Interhotel Portfolio)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2013/C 376/01

On 13 December 2013, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32013M7101. EUR-Lex is the online access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32013M7101. EUR-Lex is the online access to the European law.

---
260 La. 411

#### Mrs. Imogene HOCUT v. INSURANCE COMPANY OF NORTH AMERICA.

No. 52003.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Jan. 17, 1972.

In re: Insurance Company of North America, applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, Parish of Cameron. 254 So.2d 108.

Writ denied. On the facts found by the Court of Appeal, there is no error of law in the judgment complained of.

McCALEB, C. J., and BARHAM and DIXON, JJ., are of the opinion that the application should be granted.
H. R. 3186

One Hundred Third Congress

of the

United States of America

AT THE SECOND SESSION

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,

the twenty-fifth day of January, one thousand nine hundred and ninety-four

An Act

To designate the United States courthouse located in Houma, Louisiana, as the

‘‘George Arceneaux, Jr., United States Courthouse’’.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

The United States courthouse located at 800 East Main Street

in Houma, Louisiana, is designated as the ‘‘George Arceneaux,

Jr., United States Courthouse’’.

SEC. 2. LEGAL REFERENCES.

Any reference in a law, regulation, document, record, map,

or other paper of the United States to the courthouse referred

to in section 1 is deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘George Arceneaux,

Jr., United States Courthouse’’.

Speaker of the House of Representatives.

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
ex10a.htm
















Exhibit (10)(a)

















Consent of Ernst & Young LLP, Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm












We consent to the reference to our firm under the caption “Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm” in Post-Effective Amendment No. 33 to the 1933 Act Registration Statement (Form N-4 No. 333-135039) and Amendment No. 520 to the 1940 Act Registration Statement (Form N-4 No. 811-08517), and to the use therein of our reports dated (a) March 31, 2016, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of The Lincoln National Life Insurance Company and (b) April 12, 2016, with respect to the financial statements of Lincoln Life Variable Annuity Account N for the interests in a separate account under individual flexible payment deferred variable annuity contracts.







/s/ Ernst & Young LLP







Philadelphia, Pennsylvania


November 10, 2016
#### GULF COAST TRUCK & EQUIPMENT CO. v. SANFORD et al.

No. 39362.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Feb. 1970.

Certiorari denied without opinion.
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3188 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3188

   To amend the Central Bering Sea Fisheries Enforcement Act of 1992.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 29, 1993

   Mr. Young of Alaska (for himself, Mr. Studds, Mr. Manton, and Mr. 
 Fields of Texas) introduced the following bill; which was referred to 
             the Committee on Merchant Marine and Fisheries

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend the Central Bering Sea Fisheries Enforcement Act of 1992.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Sea of Okhotsk Fisheries Enforcement 
Act of 1993''.

SEC. 2. FISHING PROHIBITION.

    The Central Bering Sea Fisheries Enforcement Act of 1992, Public 
Law 102-582, (16 U.S.C. 1823 note), is amended--
            (1) in section 302, by inserting the words ``and the 
        Central Sea of Okhotsk'' after ``Central Bering Sea''; and
            (2) in section 306, by inserting the following new 
        definition as paragraph (7):
            ``(7) Sea of okhotsk.--The term `Central Sea of Okhotsk' 
        means the central Sea of Okhotsk area which is more than two 
        hundred nautical miles seaward of the baselines from which the 
        breadth of the territorial sea of the Russian Federation is 
        measured''.

                                 <all>
```
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1303 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1303

    To amend certain appropriations Acts to repeal the requirement 
    directing the Administrator of General Services to sell Federal 
  property and assets that support the operations of the Plum Island 
Animal Disease Center in Plum Island, New York, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                July 16 (legislative day, July 15), 2013

 Mr. Blumenthal (for himself, Mr. Schumer, and Mr. Murphy) introduced 
the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee 
                    on Environment and Public Works

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To amend certain appropriations Acts to repeal the requirement 
    directing the Administrator of General Services to sell Federal 
  property and assets that support the operations of the Plum Island 
Animal Disease Center in Plum Island, New York, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REPEAL OF REQUIREMENT TO SELL CERTAIN FEDERAL PROPERTY IN 
              PLUM ISLAND, NEW YORK.

    (a) Repeal of Requirement in Public Law 110-329.--Section 540 of 
the Department of Homeland Security Appropriations Act, 2009 (division 
D of Public Law 110-329; 122 Stat. 3688) is repealed.
    (b) Repeal of Requirement in Public Law 112-74.--Section 538 of the 
Department of Homeland Security Appropriations Act, 2012 (6 U.S.C. 190 
note; division D of Public Law 112-74) is repealed.
                                 <all>
```