alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
From: John.A.Dege@dupont.com [mailto:John.A.Dege@dupont.com]

Sent: Monday, October 13, 2014 8:11 AM

To: Hirtz, Paula

Subject: RE: DuPont Comment on the Off

- Site Waste and Recovery Operations NESHAP

Thanks

, we are reviewing applicability even for sites with OSWRO in their Title Vs.

T he remaining DuPont sites are at Mobile, Alabama and Orange,TX.

I can send their Title V addresses later;

Our previous company air expert on this rule has retired.

The two sit es are major for HAPs.

From: Julian.Bingham@dupont.com [mailto:Julian.Bingham@dupont.com]

Sent: Tuesday, December 30, 2014 11:32 AM

To: John.A.Dege@dupont.com

Cc: Hirtz, Paula

Subject: RE: OSWRO Rulemaking Docket Memo

Hi John, Paula,

The Mobile site only accepts wastewater from AMVAC (the sites old “C Unit”) that has a VOHAP

concentration of less than 400 ppmw.

Julian Bingham

DuPont MMC

251.679.5294

From: Debbie.J.Mulrooney@dupont.com [mailto:Debbie.J.Mulrooney@dupont.com]

Sent: Monday, January 05, 2015 10:39 AM

To: Hirtz, Paula

Cc: Thomas.S.Webster

- III@dupont.com; Patricia.McGee@dupont.com

Subject: RE: OSWRO Rulemaking Docket Memo

- info

Hi Paula,

As you probably know, John Dege is retired as of December 31. I am now the OSWRO co ntact for

corporate DuPont.

Regarding the Sabine River Works site, the unit that is subject to OSWRO is a hazardous waste

incinerator area. The incinerator itself is subject to both RCRA and MACT EEE. The incinerator receives

wastes from other DuPont site s as both liquids and in containers. The liquid waste is stored in tanks in

the incinerator area. These tanks are subject to OSWRO and also RCRA. No waste is received from

outside the company.

Please let me know if you have any other questions. I am includ ing my contact information below,

however, come the middle of the month email will be the best way to reach me as I will be moving to a

different Wilmington location in mid

- January and will have a new phone number.

Debbie Mulrooney

Debbie.j.mulrooney@dupont.com

(302) 774

- 8083

1007 Market St.

Wilmington, DE 19898From: Debbie.J.Mulrooney@dupont.com [mailto:Debbie.J.Mulrooney@dupont.com]

Sent: Wednesday, January 07, 2015 3:34 PM

To: Hirtz, Paula

Subject: RE: OSWRO Rulemaking Docket Memo

- info

Hi Paula,

Here are the answers to your questions:

 The reduction in emissions of hydrazine, chlorine and HCl from the Axis, AL site are the result of

changes to a different mix of products that have different raw materials and emissions

 The reduction in nickel emissions from the Sabine River Works site is due to a reduction in a

nickel

- containing waste stream received at the incinerator from an on

- site process.

Please let me know if you need any other inform ation,

Debbie
# C_2014068EN.01000101.xml

| 7.3.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 68/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.3.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 68/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.7176 — CFAO/Carrefour/JV)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2014/C 68/01

On 28 February 2014, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in French and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32014M7176. EUR-Lex is the online access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32014M7176. EUR-Lex is the online access to the European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3321 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3321

  To provide increased flexibility to States in carrying out the Low-
                 Income Home Energy Assistance Program.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 20, 1993

  Mr. Frank of Massachusetts introduced the following bill; which was 
   referred jointly to the Committees on Banking, Finance and Urban 
         Affairs, Education and Labor, and Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To provide increased flexibility to States in carrying out the Low-
                 Income Home Energy Assistance Program.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. INCREASED STATE FLEXIBILITY IN THE LOW-INCOME HOME ENERGY 
              ASSISTANCE PROGRAM.

    Section 927 of the Housing and Community Development 
Reauthorization Act of 1992 (Public Law 102-550) is amended--
            (1) in subsection (a)--
                    (A) by striking the parenthetical phrase; and
                    (B) by inserting before the period ``, except as 
                provided in subsection (d)'';
            (2) in subsection (b)--
                    (A) by striking ``such'' and inserting in lieu 
                thereof ``or receiving energy''; and
                    (B) by inserting before the period ``for any 
                program in which eligibility or benefits are based on 
                need, except as provided in subsection (d)''; and
            (3) by inserting at the end thereof the following new 
        subsection:
    ``(d) Special Rule for Low-Income Home Energy Assistance Program.--
For purposes of the Low-Income Home Energy Assistance Program, tenants 
described in subsection (a)(2) who are responsible for paying heating 
or cooling costs shall not have their eligibility automatically denied. 
A State may consider the amount of the heating or cooling component of 
utility allowances received by tenants described in subsection (a)(2) 
when setting benefit levels under the Low-Income Home Energy Assistance 
Program. The size of any reduction in Low-Income Home Energy Assistance 
Program benefits must be reasonably related to the amount of the 
heating or cooling component of the utility allowance received and must 
ensure that the highest level of assistance will be provided to those 
households with the highest energy burdens in compliance with section 
2605(b)(5) of the Low-Income Home Energy Assistance Act of 1981 (42 
U.S.C. 8624(b)(5)).''.

                                 <all>
```
NO. 07-10-00510-CV

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AT AMARILLO

PANEL A

MAY 5, 2011

MARIA ANTONIETTA BERGIA, APPELLANT

v.

VICTOR BERGIA, APPELLEE 

 FROM THE 72ND DISTRICT COURT OF LUBBOCK COUNTY;

NO. 2010-550,438; HONORABLE RUBEN GONZALES REYES, JUDGE

Before CAMPBELL and HANCOCK and PIRTLE, JJ.

**MEMORANDUM OPINION**

Appellant, Maria Antonietta Bergia, filed a notice of appeal of an order granting appellee, Victor Bergia, summary judgment.  We dismiss for want of jurisdiction.

On August 11, 2010, the trial court signed an Order on Motion for Summary Judgment, which dismissed Maria’s claims with prejudice.  On September 10, 2010, Maria timely filed a motion for new trial.[footnoteRef:1]  The clerk’s record does not contain an order on Maria’s motion, so it appears that Maria’s motion was overruled by operation of law.  See TEX. R. CIV. P. 329b(c).  Maria filed notice of appeal in the trial court on December 15, 2010. [1:  In a civil case, notice of appeal must be filed within 30 days after the judgment is signed unless any party files certain motions, including a motion for new trial, which extends the time for filing a notice of appeal to 90 days after the judgment is signed.  See TEX. R. APP. P. 26.1(a).] 

By letter dated April 15, 2011, we notified Maria that her notice of appeal appears to have been untimely filed, and that it was not filed within 15 days of the date that it was due.  See TEX. R. APP. P. 26.3; Verburgt v. Dorner, 959 S.W.2d 615, 616-17 (Tex. 1997).  As such, we directed Maria to file a written response explaining why the notice of appeal was filed late, or why appellant believes it was timely filed on or before April 25, 2011.  We additionally informed Maria that failure to comply with the Court’s directive may result in dismissal of her appeal.  See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(a), (c). 

	To date, Maria has not responded to our directive and has not identified how her notice of appeal was sufficient to invoke the jurisdiction of this Court.  Consequently, we now dismiss this appeal for want of jurisdiction and for Maria’s failure to comply with a directive of this Court.  TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(a), (c).

								Mackey K. Hancock

									Justice

2

2
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 23.4

                           CONSENT OF DIRECTOR NOMINEE

         The undersigned hereby consents to serve as a director of Watson
Wyatt & Company Holdings, a Delaware corporation, (the "Company") subject to
her election by the stockholders of the Company and to the inclusion of her
as a nominee for director of the Company in any proxy statement or
registration statement filed and/or distributed by or on behalf of the
Company.

Dated:  September 13, 2000

                                                   /s/  Elizabeth M. Caflisch
                                                   ----------------------------
                                                   Name: Elizabeth M. Caflisch
# C_2014027EN.01000201.xml

| 30.1.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 27/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.1.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 27/2

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.7035 — Austevoll Seafood/Kvefi/JV)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2014/C 27/03)

On 19 December 2013, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32013M7035. EUR-Lex is the online access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32013M7035. EUR-Lex is the online access to the European law.

---
IIA

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 3285

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

NOVEMBER 9 (legislative day, NOVEMBER 2), 1993

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Governmental Affairs

AN ACT

To redesignate the postal facility located at 1401 West Fort

Street, Detroit, Michigan, as the ‘‘George W. Young

Post Office’’.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. REDESIGNATION.

4 The postal facility located at 1401 West Fort Street,

5 in Detroit, Michigan, shall be known and designated as

6 the ‘‘George W. Young Post Office’’.

7 SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

8 Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document,

9 paper, or other record of the United States to the postal

10 facility referred to in section 1 shall be deemed to be a

11 reference to the ‘‘George W. Young Post Office’’.
2

HR 3285 RFS

Passed the House of Representatives November 8,

1993.

Attest: DONNALD K. ANDERSON,

Clerk.
Exhibit 31.3.1  CERTIFICATIONS  O&R - Principal Executive Officer  I, John D. McMahon, the principal executive officer of Orange and
Rockland Utilities, Inc., certify that:  1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year
ended  December 31, 2003 of Orange
and Rockland Utilities, Inc.;  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects
the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant
as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;  4. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible
for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:  (a) Designed such disclosure controls and
procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed
under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by
others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this
report is being prepared;  (b) 
[Paragraph omitted pursuant to SEC Release Nos. 33-8238 and 34-47986.]  (c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the
registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report
our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and
procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such
evaluation; and  (d) Disclosed in this report any change in the
registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the
registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter
in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably
likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial
reporting; and  5. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants
board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):  (a) All significant deficiencies and material
weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial
reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants
ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that
involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the
registrants internal control over financial reporting.  Date: March 29, 2004/s/John D. McMahonJohn D. McMahonPresident and Chief Executive Officer
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 23.1

                         Consent of Ernst & Young, LLP
                   Independent Certified Public Accountants

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
(forms S-3 No. 33-47060, 33-47610, 33-61204, 33-78296, 33-84554 and 333-11765)
of Hydron Technologies, Inc. and in the related Prospectus of our report dated
February 19, 1997,  with respect to the financial statements of Hydron
Technologies, Inc. included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended
December 31, 1996.


/s/ Ernst & Young, LLP


West Palm Beach, Florida
March 25, 1997
1

13 16 20 16 14 13 13

32 27 29 34 33 27 26

37 36 31 29 33 39 39

12 12 13 13 11 11 12

6 8 8 9 10 10 10

0%

25%

50%

75%

100%

1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 2012

75 years and older

65-74 years

45-64 years

30-44 years

Under 30 years

Source: U.S. Census Bureau, Current Population Survey, 1960, 1970, 1980, 1990, 2000, 2010, 2012 

Annual Social and Economic Supplements.

Figure 1. Households by age of householder: 

1960-2012
103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 3049

AN ACT

To extend the current interim exemption under the

fisheries until April 1, 1994.Marine Mammal Protection Act for commercial
103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 3049

AN ACT

To extend the current interim exemption under the Marine

Mammal Protection Act for commercial fisheries until

April 1, 1994.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That section 114(a)(1) of the Marine Mammal Protection

4 Act of 1972 (16 U.S.C. 1383a(a)(1)), is amended by strik5 ing ‘‘October 1, 1993,’’ and inserting in lieu thereof ‘‘April

6 1, 1994,’’.

Passed the House of Representatives September 21,

1993.

Attest:

Clerk.
|     (1)       | Such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2010, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|     (2)       | The information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2010, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Triple Dragon Acquisition Corp. |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                                                  |   |                                                           |   |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Date: November 8, 2010        | By:    | /s/ Samuel May                                                 |   |
|                                                                  |   | Samuel May                                                     |   |
|                                                                  |   | President, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer |   |
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 3321

To provide increased flexibility to States in carrying out the Low-Income

Home Energy Assistance Program.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

OCTOBER 20, 1993

Mr. FRANK of Massachusetts introduced the following bill; which was referred

jointly to the Committees on Banking, Finance and Urban Affairs, Education and Labor, and Energy and Commerce

A BILL

To provide increased flexibility to States in carrying out

the Low-Income Home Energy Assistance Program.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. INCREASED STATE FLEXIBILITY IN THE LOW4 INCOME HOME ENERGY ASSISTANCE PRO5 GRAM.

6 Section 927 of the Housing and Community Develop7 ment Reauthorization Act of 1992 (Public Law 102–550)

8 is amended—

9 (1) in subsection (a)—
2

•HR 3321 IH

1 (A) by striking the parenthetical phrase;

2 and

3 (B) by inserting before the period ‘‘, except

4 as provided in subsection (d)’’;

5 (2) in subsection (b)—

6 (A) by striking ‘‘such’’ and inserting in

7 lieu thereof ‘‘or receiving energy’’; and

8 (B) by inserting before the period ‘‘for any

9 program in which eligibility or benefits are

10 based on need, except as provided in subsection

11 (d)’’; and

12 (3) by inserting at the end thereof the following

13 new subsection:

14 ‘‘(d) SPECIAL RULE FOR LOW-INCOME HOME EN15 ERGY ASSISTANCE PROGRAM.—For purposes of the Low16 Income Home Energy Assistance Program, tenants de17 scribed in subsection (a)(2) who are responsible for paying

18 heating or cooling costs shall not have their eligibility

19 automatically denied. A State may consider the amount

20 of the heating or cooling component of utility allowances

21 received by tenants described in subsection (a)(2) when

22 setting benefit levels under the Low-Income Home Energy

23 Assistance Program. The size of any reduction in Low24 Income Home Energy Assistance Program benefits must

25 be reasonably related to the amount of the heating or cool-
3

•HR 3321 IH

1 ing component of the utility allowance received and must

2 ensure that the highest level of assistance will be provided

3 to those households with the highest energy burdens in

4 compliance with section 2605(b)(5) of the Low-Income

5 Home Energy Assistance Act of 1981 (42 U.S.C.

6 8624(b)(5)).’’.

Æ
^mRTMENTOF 

."ANSPORTATfON 

SERVED AUGUST 26,2010 ''^^^ OPERATIONS 

i m m 21 A 9:29 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

WASHINGTON, DC 

IN THE MATTER OF 

DONNA R. DEVANEY 

FAA DOCKET NO. CPlOWPOOl 1 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

DMS NO. FAA-2010-0785 

NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT OF PROCEEDING 

This proceeding (heretofore designated as Case No. 2010WP250031) has been assigned to 

Administrative Lavk? Judge Richard C. Goodwin. All future pleadings and other communications 

regarding this proceeding shall be served on the Judge, the FAA Hearing Docket, and the other 

persons on the attached Service List. 

Ronnie A. Yod( 

Chief Administrative 

Attachment - Service List 
FAA Docket No. CPlOWPOOl 1 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

SERVICE LIST 

ORIGINAL & ONE COPY 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Wilbur Wright Building - Suite 2W1000' 

ONE COPY 

Donna R. Devaney, Respondent 

212 Steeplebrook Dr. 

Spring Branch, TX 78070 

TEL: 830-885-5797 

Adam Runkel, Complainant's Counsel 

Office of the Regional Counsel 

Western-Pacific Region, AWP-7.12 

Federal Aviation Administration 

P.O. Box 92007 

Los Angeles, CA 90009-2007 

TEL: 310-725-7142 

FAX: 310-725-6816 

The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin, Administrative Law Judge 

Office of Hearings, M-20 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. 

East Building Ground Floor, Room El2-320 

Washington, DC^0590 

TEL: Attorney-Advisor 202-366-2139 

Legal Assistant 202-366-5121 

FAX: 202-366-7536 

' Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person or by expedited courier, use the following address: 

Hearing Docket, Federal Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S. W., Wilbur Wright Building - Room 

2014, Washington, DC 20591, Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430.