alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32





FULUCAI PRODUCTIONS LTD.





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. Section 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of FuLuCai Productions Ltd. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending January 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, James Durward, as Chief Executive Officer, President (Principal Executive Officer) of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








Date: March 11, 2011
By:
/s/ James DurwardName:
James DurwardTitle:
President, Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 1350 of Title 18 of the United States Code has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





The foregoing certification is being furnished as an exhibit to the Report pursuant to Item 601(b)(32) of Regulation S-K and Section 1350 of Title 18 of the United States Code and, accordingly, is not being filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission as part of the Report and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (whether made before or after the date of the Report, irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.)
**EXHIBIT 31.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

 

I, Robert A. Hamwee, Chief Executive Officer of New Mountain Finance Holdings, L.L.C., certify that:

 

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of New Mountain Finance Holdings, L.L.C.;

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

 

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

 

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

 

c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

 

a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

 

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

 

Dated this day of November 14, 2011

 

 
| /s/ Robert A. Hamwee |
|----------------------|
| **Robert A. Hamwee** |

 

----
Exhibit 32.2Certification of Principal Financial Officer (1)Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,the following certification is being made to accompany the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-Kfor the period ended July 30, 2005:In connection with the Annual Report of Del Global Technologies Corp. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Kfor the period ended July 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the datehereof (the “Report”), I, Mark Koch, Principal Accounting Officer of the Company, certify, pursuantto 18 U.S.C. § 1350, adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that to myknowledge:     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), asapplicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.         /s/ Mark A Zorko       Name: Mark A Zorko      Title: Principal Financial Officer      Date: October 27, 2006         (1) A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided toDel Global Technologies Corp and will be retained by Del Global Technologies Corp. and furnished tothe Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and is notbeing filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.
1 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF IDAHO

Docket No. 41843

STATE OF IDAHO

,

Plaintiff-Respondent

,

v.

JOSHUA MICHAEL TRENT

,

Defendant-Appellant

. )

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

) 2014 Unpublished Opinion No. 704

Filed: August 28, 2014

Stephen W. Kenyon, Clerk

THIS IS AN UNPUBLISHED

OPINION AND SHALL NOT

BE CITED AS AUTHORITY

Appeal from the District Court of the Fourth Judicial District, State of Idaho, Ada
County. Hon. Michael E. Wetherell , District Judge.

Order denying I.C.R. 35 motion for reduction of sentence, affirmed

.

Sara B. Thomas, State Appellate Public Defender; Shawn F. Wilkerson, Deputy
Appellate Public Defender, Boise, for appellant.

Hon. Lawrence G. Wasden, Attorney General; Kenneth K. Jorgensen, Deputy
Attorney General, Boise, for respondent.

________________________________________________

Before GUTIERREZ, Chief Judge; GRATTON, Judge;
and MELANSON, Judge

PER CURIAM

Joshua Michael Trent pled guilty to felony driving under the influence . I.C. § § 18

- 8004,

18

- 8005(6) . The district court sentenced Trent to a unified term of eight years, with a minimum

period of confinment of two and one

- half years

. Trent filed an I.C.R 35 motion, which the

district court denied. Trent appeals.

A motion for reduction of sentence under I.C.R. 35 is essentially a plea for leniency,

addressed to the sound discretion of the court. State v. Knighton , 143 Idaho 318, 319, 144 P.3d

23, 24 (2006); State v. Allbee , 115 Idaho 845, 846, 771 P.2d 66, 67 (Ct. App. 1989). In

presenting a Rule 35 motion, the defendant must show that the sentence is excessive in light of

new or additional information subsequently provided to the district court in support of the

motion. State v. Huffman , 144 Idaho 201, 203, 159 P.3d 838, 840 (2007). Upon review of the2 record, we conclude no abuse of discretion has been shown. Therefore, the district court’s order

denying Trent ’s Rule 35 motion is aff irmed.
**Final Listing of Questionnaire Files for Steam Electric Rulemaking Record**

**Plant ID 06910**  **Removed from Public**  **(Non-CBI) Docket**  **1 Copyright** 

**Flag 2**  **File Name Description**  x 

### 06910\06910_Checklist_092910_version34.xls EPA Technical Review Checklist Workbook



### 06910\06910_Completeness_Checklist.xls EPA Completeness Review Checklist 

### 06910\06910_HardcopyLog.doc EPA log of hardcopy documents submitted x 

### 06910\06910_PartA.xls Plant submitted survey file x 

### 06910\06910_PartB.xls Plant submitted survey file x 

### 06910\06910_PartC.xls Plant submitted survey file x 

### 06910\06910_PartD.xls Plant submitted survey file x 

### 06910\06910_PartE.xls Plant submitted survey file x 

### 06910\06910_PartH.xls Plant submitted survey file



### 06910\Certification Statement_06910.pdf Plant certification statement x 

### 06910\Supporting Documentation\06910_MAP-1 A5-2 Plant diagram.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey



### 06910\Supporting Documentation\06910_MLPP Thermal Evaluation 26Aug03.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey 

### 06910\Supporting Documentation\06910_MLPPthermalSupp14Aug04.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 

### 06910\Supporting Documentation\06910_WB-1 A5-3 Water balance diagram.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

1Final reviewed survey responses are located in the Steam Electric Technical Questionnaire Database

. 2Copyright documents are available from the docket.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of VR Holdings, Inc. for the fiscal quarter ending June 30, 2011, I, John E. Baker, Chief Executive Officer of VR Holdings, Inc., hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that:

1.

The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of VR Holdings, Inc.

Dated: August 22, 2011

/s/ John E. Baker

John E. Baker

Chief Executive Officer of VR Holdings, Inc.
Order entered April 16, 2021

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-21-00194-CV

IN RE SCOTT FRENKEL, Relator

Original Proceeding from the 296th Judicial District Court

Collin County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 296-03470-2016

ORDER

Before Justices Molberg, Reichek, and Smith

Before the Court are relator’s (1) March 29, 2021 motion to seal the petition 

for writ of mandamus; (2) March 29, 2021 motion to consider and seal the in 

camera supplemental record, and (3) April 14, 2021 motion to seal the in camera

supplemental record. Relator states that the petition’s appendix and supplemental 

record contain documents that were filed under seal in the trial court, and he asks

this Court to maintain the petition and supplemental record under seal. The trial 

court’s March 1, 2021 sealing order, however, does not meet the requirements of 

Rule 76a. See TEX. R. CIV. P. 76a (setting forth the requirements for sealing court 

records).
We will TEMPORARILY SEAL the petition for writ of mandamus and 

supplemental record pending further order of this Court. The parties have 

TWENTY DAYS from the date of this order to provide a proper Rule 76a order 

from the trial court permitting the filing of the documents under seal and to 

supplement the mandamus record with a copy of that order. Failure to do so will 

result in the denial of the motion, unless, within that time frame, the parties submit 

briefing establishing a valid legal basis on which we may maintain the documents

under seal without an order sealing the documents in the trial court.

Also before the Court is relator’s March 31, 2021 second emergency motion 

for temporary relief. Based on relator’s April 13, 2021 letter advising us that the 

trial court has now granted his requested relief, we DENY the second emergency 

motion as moot.

/s/ AMANDA L. REICHEK

JUSTICE
<PAGE>
                                                            Exhibit 23.1

                           INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT


The Board of Directors and Shareholders
Del Laboratories, Inc.:

We consent to incorporate by reference in the Registration Statement (No. 
33-27777) on Form S-8 and Registration Statement (No. 33-64777) on Form S-8 
of Del Laboratories, Inc. of our report dated February 19, 1999, relating to 
the consolidated balance sheets of Del Laboratories, Inc. and subsidiaries as 
of December 31, 1998 and 1997 and the related consolidated statements of 
earnings, shareholders' equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the 
three-year period ended December 31, 1998, and the related schedule which 
report appears in the December 31, 1998 annual report on Form 10-K of Del 
Laboratories, Inc.

                                    KPMG LLP

Melville, New York
March 26, 1999
#### Johnnie LEE, a/k/a James Brown, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 72-927.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

June 21, 1973.

Richard L. Jorandby, Public Defender, and Richard S. Power, Asst. Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Fredric J. Scott, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. Cf. Beckton v. State, Fla.App.1969, 227 So.2d 223.

CROSS and MAGER, JJ., and MORROW, RUSSELL O., Associate Judge, concur.
#### Clarence SLOAN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1215.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Fourth District.

July 28, 1967.

Appeal from Criminal Court of Record, Orange County; Warren H. Edwards, Judge.

Appeal dismissed.
#### Belarmino GONZALEZ, Anna Gonzalez, and Norma Iris Collazo, Appellants, v. FIREMAN’S FUND INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellee.

No. 70-415.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Jan. 29, 1971.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3280 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3280

  To suspend temporarily the duties on salmeterol xinafoate (bulk and 
                             dosage forms).

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 13, 1993

   Mr. Valentine (for himself, Mr. Price of North Carolina, and Mr. 
  Lancaster) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To suspend temporarily the duties on salmeterol xinafoate (bulk and 
                             dosage forms).

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SALMETEROL XINAFOATE (BULK AND DOSAGE FORMS).

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:
      

       ``  9902.31.12   4-Hydroxy-<greek-a><SUP>1-[[[6-(4-            No change      No change      On or before     
                         phenylbutoxy)hexyl]amino]-                                             12/31/95      ''
                         methyl]-1,3-                                                                          .
                         benzenedimethanol, 1-hydroxy-                                                          
                         2-naphthalenecarboxylate                                                               
                         (CAS No. 94749-08-3)                                                                   
                         (provided for in subheadings                                                           
                         2922.50.25 and 3004.90.60)..  Free                                                     

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
with respect to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for 
consumption, on or after the 15th day after the date of the enactment 
of this Act.

                                 <all>
```
### IN THE SUPREME COURT STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA

2022 ND 81

Bejan David Etemad, Petitioner and Appellant

v. State of North Dakota, Respondent and Appellee

No. 20210343

Appeal from the District Court of Grand Forks County, Northeast Central Judicial District, the Honorable Jay D

. Knudson , Judge.

AFFIRMED

. Per Curiam

. Scott O. Diamond, Fargo, ND , for petitioner and appellant.
Ashlei A. Neufeld, Assistant State’s Attorney, Grand Forks, ND , for respondent and appellee.1 Ete mad v. State No. 20210343
Per Curiam.
[¶1] Bejan David Etemad appealed from a district court order denying his amended application for post

- conviction relief. On appeal, Etemad argues the district court erred in finding that he knowingly, intelligently, and voluntarily waived his right to counsel. Following a post

- conviction evidentiary hearing, the court found that Etemad knowingly, intelligently, and voluntarily waived his right to counsel. We conclude the district court’s findings are not clearly erroneous and the court did not err in denying Ete mad’s application for post

conviction relief. We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2).
[¶2] Jon J. Jensen, C.J. Gerald W. VandeWalle Daniel J. Crothers Lisa Fair McEvers Jerod E. Tufte
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3108 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3108

 To authorize the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to expand the scope of 
               services provided veterans in Vet Centers.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 21, 1993

   Mr. Smith of New Jersey introduced the following bill; which was 
             referred to the Committee on Veterans' Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To authorize the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to expand the scope of 
               services provided veterans in Vet Centers.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SCOPE OF SERVICES PROVIDED IN VET CENTERS.

    (a) Expansion of Services.--Section 1712A of title 38, United 
States Code, is amended--
            (1) in subsection (a)(1) by inserting ``and, to the extent 
        otherwise authorized by law, may furnish such additional needed 
        services as described in subsection (h)'' in the first sentence 
        after ``life''; and
            (2) by adding at the end the following new subsection:
    ``(h) In operating centers under this section, the Secretary may 
provide (1) preventive health care services, (2) medical services 
reasonably necessary in preparation for hospital admission, and (3) 
referral services to assist in obtaining specialized care. The 
Secretary shall provide such services through such health care 
personnel as the Secretary determines appropriate.''.
    (b) Report.--Not later than one year after the date of the 
enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall submit to the Committees on 
Veterans' Affairs of the Senate and House of Representatives a report 
relating to the implementation of the amendments made by subsection 
(a). The report shall include the following:
            (1) The number of veterans provided services described in 
        section 1712A(h) of title 38, United States Code, as added by 
        subsection (a).
            (2) The number of centers which provided services described 
        in that section.
            (3) An assessment of the effect providing such services has 
        had on access to and timeliness of service delivery.

                                 <all>
```
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3045 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3045

To extend through December 31, 1995, the existing temporary suspension 
    of the duty on diphenyldichlorosilane and phenyltrichlorosilane.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 9, 1993

 Mr. Solomon introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To extend through December 31, 1995, the existing temporary suspension 
    of the duty on diphenyldichlorosilane and phenyltrichlorosilane.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled, That heading 9902.30.77 
of subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the 
United States is amended by striking out ``12/31/92'' and inserting in 
lieu thereof ``12/31/95''.
    Sec. 2. The amendment made by the first section of this Act applies 
with respect to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, after 
December 31, 1992.

                                 <all>
```
<PAGE>   1






                                                                 FORM 10-K

EXHIBIT 21.                SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                                     State or Other
                                                                     Jurisdiction of                                    
                                                                     Incorporation                            
         Name of Subsidiary                                          or Organization                            
         ------------------                                          ---------------
<S>                                                                  <C>            <C> 
The Elco Corporation                                                 Ohio           (1)

         ELDISC Export Co. (100% owned by The Elco Corporation)      Delaware       (1)

         Harvel Plastics, Inc. (85% owned by The Elco Corporation)   Pennsylvania   (1)

Seibert-Oxidermo, Inc.                                               Michigan       (1)

Wayne Chemical Products Company                                      Michigan       (2)
</TABLE>



(1) Financial statements of subsidiary company included in the Consolidated
    financial statements.

(2) Inactive Corporation