alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
An official website of the United States government                

----

end of header

Census.govNewsroomReleases

# Newsroom Archive

Skip left menu navigation                          - About the Newsroom
                          - Facts for Features
                          - **News Releases**
                          - Press Kits
                          - Tip Sheets

## Mobility of the Population

The Newsroom site has been redesigned and relocated.  This is the archive area.

For the most current releases please visit the redesigned newsroom at:https://www.census.gov/newsroom.html

For previous press releases please contact the Public Information Office at 301-763-3030.

### 2012

                          - December 10:   Census Bureau Reports National Mover Rate Increases  After a Record Low in 2011
                          - September 27:   Populations Increasing in Many Downtowns, Census Bureau Reports
                          - March 28:   Census Bureau Releases First Information Since 2000 Census  on Moves Between Counties

### 2011

                          - November 15:   Mover Rate Reaches Record Low, Census Bureau Reports
                          - November 15:   Oficina del Censo divulga tasa de personas que cambiaron residencia alcanza su nivel más bajo
                          - May 23:   Census Bureau Reports Housing is Top Reason People Moved Between 2009 and 2010

CONNECT WITH US**********

                            - Information Quality
                            - Data Linkage Infrastructure
                            - Data Protection and Privacy Policy
                            - Accessibility
                            - FOIA
                            - Inspector General
                            - No FEAR Act
                            - U.S. Department of Commerce
                            - USA.gov

----

Measuring America's People, Places, and Economy

Is this page helpful?
YesNo

NO THANKS

255 characters maximum255 characters maximum reached

Thank you for your feedback.Comments or suggestions? 

PIO@census.gov
Exhibit 21

                          DEL GLOBAL TECHNOLOGIES CORP.

                             PRINCIPAL SUBSIDIARIES

                              AS OF AUGUST 3, 2002

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Name                                State of Incorporation           Conducts Business Under
----                                ----------------------           -----------------------
<S>                                    <C>                               <C>
Del Global Technologies Corp.              New York                      Del High Voltage

Del Medical Imaging Corp.                  Delaware                            Same

Villa Sistemi Medicali S.p.A.          Italy (80% owned)                       Same

Bertan High Voltage Corp.                  New York                            Same

RFI Corporation                            Delaware                            Same
</TABLE>
#### Robert RUBINSTEIN d/b/a Robert Rubinstein Interiors, Inc., Appellant, v. Murray MESTER, Appellee.

No. 77-585.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Sept. 19, 1978.

Rehearing Denied Oct. 20, 1978.

Sidney B. Shapiro and Mitchell M. Goldman, Miami, for appellant.

Horton, Perse & Ginsberg, Barry L. Gar-ber, Miami, for appellee.

Before HENDRY and KEHOE, JJ., and CHARLES CARROLL (Ret.), Associate Judge.

KEHOE, Judge.

Appellant, defendant below, brings this appeal from a final judgment entered by the trial court on March 2, 1977, after a non-jury trial, in favor of appellee, plaintiff below. We reverse.

In March of 1975, appellee entered into a contract with appellant for his services as an interior decorator and designer. Under the terms of the contract, appellee made an initial payment to appellant of $16,500. Thereafter, the record reflects that appellee became dissatisfied with appellant’s estimate of the number of rolls of wallpaper and the labor charges to hang the paper necessary to complete that portion of the contract. Based upon appellee’s dissatisfaction with appellant’s performance, appellee, by a letter dated June 26, 1975, unilaterally terminated the contract. Thereafter, ap-pellee filed a complaint for damages seeking damages in the amount of $16,500. After a non-jury trial, the trial court entered a final judgment in favor of appellee in the amount of $13,500, and awarded appellant the sum of $3,000 for services rendered under the contract. From this final judgment, appellant brings the instant appeal.

We have carefully reviewed the record and, after considering the evidence in a light most favorable to appellee, have *987concluded that the evidence was insufficient to sustain the findings of the trial court that appellant breached the contract in question and that appellee was entitled to damages. See, e. g., *Commercial Bank of Kendall v. Costley,*324 So.2d 182 (Fla. 3d DCA 1975); *Apeco Marina, Inc. v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Co.,*301 So.2d 136 (Fla. 3d DCA 1974); *Manchester Insurance & Indemnity Co. v. Novack,*284 So.2d 433 (Fla. 3d DCA 1973); and *Heath v. First National Bank of Milton,*213 So.2d 883 (Fla. 1st DCA 1968). The total overestimation and overcharge, if any, under the contract was so insignificant as to not justify a rescission or revocation of the contract. Further, we note that appellee, subsequent to approving the estimates made by appellant under the contract, attempted to base his complaint upon an alleged discrepancy which amounted, at most, to less than 1.4% of the entire contract price.

However, in our opinion, the record does clearly show that appellee breached his contract with appellant; therefore, the' trial court should have granted judgment in favor. of appellant pursuant to his counterclaim set forth in his answer and counterclaim. Accordingly, the final judgment appealed is reversed and the cause is remanded to the trial court for the purpose of ascertaining damages under the contract, consistent with this opinion.

Reversed and remanded with directions.
<PAGE>   1

                                                                   EXHIBIT 12(b)

                       DEAN FOODS COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES

 COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES AND PREFERRED STOCK DIVIDENDS

                             (Dollars in thousands)


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                 FISCAL YEARS ENDING MAY
                                               ------------------------------------------------------------
                                                 2001         2000         1999         1998         1997
                                                 ----         ----         ----         ----         ----
<S>                                            <C>          <C>          <C>          <C>          <C>
Income (loss) from continuing operations
     before taxes                              $120,903     $173,274     $115,297     $143,730     $124,529
                                               ------------------------------------------------------------

Fixed charges:
        Interest expense                         74,053       50,148       39,098       21,101       15,071
        Portion of rentals (33%)                 18,414       16,797       13,916       10,758        8,417
                                               ------------------------------------------------------------

        Total fixed charges                      92,467       66,945       53,014       31,859       23,488
                                               ------------------------------------------------------------

Earnings from continuing operations before
     taxes and fixed charges                   $213,370     $240,219     $168,311     $175,589     $148,017
                                               ============================================================

Ratio of earnings to fixed charges and
preferred stock dividends                           2.3          3.6          3.2          5.5          6.3
                                               ============================================================
</TABLE>
#### WINEGARD v. FARM STORES, INC., et al.

No. 39211.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Feb. 1970.

Certiorari denied without opinion.
# C_2014041EN.01000201.xml

| 12.2.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 41/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.2.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 41/2

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

11 February 2014

2014/C 41/02

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,3676 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 140,00 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4622 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,83075 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 8,8200 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,2235 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,3680 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 27,530 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 310,10 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,1825 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,4768 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 3,0076 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,5148 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,5093 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 10,6072 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,6416 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,7330 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 457,65 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 15,0272 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 8,2879 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,6545 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 16 609,27 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,5579 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 61,610 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 47,5073 |
| THB | Thai baht | 44,757 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 3,2895 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 18,1600 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 85,0904 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,3676

JPY

Japanese yen

140,00

DKK

Danish krone

7,4622

GBP

Pound sterling

0,83075

SEK

Swedish krona

8,8200

CHF

Swiss franc

1,2235

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,3680

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

27,530

HUF

Hungarian forint

310,10

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

PLN

Polish zloty

4,1825

RON

Romanian leu

4,4768

TRY

Turkish lira

3,0076

AUD

Australian dollar

1,5148

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,5093

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

10,6072

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,6416

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,7330

KRW

South Korean won

1 457,65

ZAR

South African rand

15,0272

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

8,2879

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,6545

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

16 609,27

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,5579

PHP

Philippine peso

61,610

RUB

Russian rouble

47,5073

THB

Thai baht

44,757

BRL

Brazilian real

3,2895

MXN

Mexican peso

18,1600

INR

Indian rupee

85,0904

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY WASHINGTON , D.C. 20460

Cherilyn Moore Syngenta Crop Protection Regulatory Affairs PO Box 18300 Greensboro, NC 27419-8300 OFFICE OF CHEMICAL SAFETY AND POLLUTION PREVENTION November 5, 2014

RE: EPA Review ofDataWaiver Request for Primisulfuron-methyl GDCI-128973-1206 Dear Ms. Moore: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has completed its review ofthe waiver request for OSCPP Guideline 835.4400, anaerobic aquatic metabolism study for primisulfuron-methyl. This waiver request was submitted onFebruary 11, 2014, with Syngenta's one-yearprogress report for the Data CallIn (DCI) referenced above. Please find a copy ofthe review attached for your files. The Agency has determined that the anaerobic aquatic metabolism study is no longer needed for the current registration review ofprimisulfuron-methyl; the information submitted by Syngenta is sufficient to inform the environmental fate and effects assessment. In the absence ofthis data, EPA will assume a 178 day anaerobic aquatic metabolism half-life for primisulfuron-methyl in the risk assessment conducted for registrationreview. Therefore, the Agency is hereby waiving the datarequirements for Guideline 835.4400 in the aforementioned DCI. Please contact Christina Scheltemaofmy staffwith any questions you may have. She can be reached byphone (703-308-2201) or email (scheltema.christina@epa.gov). Sincerely,

# Paai&IJ_~ PatriciaParrott, Chief
. Risk Mitigation and Implementation Branch 3 Pesticide Re-evaluation Division
Enclosure: EPA Response to Waiver Requestfor anAnaerobicAquaticMetabolism Study (GDLN 835.4400) in Support of the Registration Review of Primisulfuron-Methyl. September 4, 2014.
cc: Kahle "Bo" Davis, Registration Division
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3147 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3147

 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to make the targeted jobs 
  credit permanent and to treat as a member of a targeted group every 
 individual who has received a Department of Defense campaign ribbon, 
         liberation ribbon, or national defense service medal.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 28, 1993

  Mr. Edwards of Texas (for himself, Mr. McCrery, Mr. Jefferson, Mr. 
McCloskey, Mr. Fish, Mr. Frost, Ms. Eddie Bernice Johnson of Texas, Mr. 
    Hayes, Mr. Chapman, Mr. Sarpalius, Mr. Lancaster, Mr. Baker of 
  Louisiana, Mr. Filner, and Mr. Levy) introduced the following bill; 
         which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to make the targeted jobs 
  credit permanent and to treat as a member of a targeted group every 
 individual who has received a Department of Defense campaign ribbon, 
         liberation ribbon, or national defense service medal.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. TARGETED JOBS CREDIT MADE PERMANENT; RECIPIENTS OF CERTAIN 
              DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE RIBBONS AND MEDALS TREATED AS 
              MEMBERS OF TARGETED GROUP.

    (a) Credit Made Permanent.--
            (1) In general.--Subsection (c) of section 51 of the 
        Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to targeted jobs 
        credit) is amended by striking paragraph (4).
            (2) Effective date.--The amendment made by paragraph (1) 
        shall apply to individuals who begin work for the employer 
        after June 30, 1992.
    (b) Recipients of Certain Department of Defense Ribbons and Medals 
Treated as Members of a Targeted Group.--
            (1) In general.--Subparagraph (C) of section 51(d)(1) of 
        such Code (relating to members of targeted groups) is amended 
        to read as follows:
                    ``(C) a conflict-era veteran,''.
            (2) Conflict-era veteran.--Paragraph (4) of section 51(d) 
        of such Code is amended to read as follows:
            ``(4) Conflict-era veteran.--The term `conflict-era 
        veteran' means any individual who is certified by the 
        designated local agency as having been awarded by the 
        Department of Defense--
                    ``(A) a campaign ribbon,
                    ``(B) a liberation ribbon, or
                    ``(C) a national defense service medal.''
            (3) Effective date.--The amendments made by this subsection 
        shall apply to individuals who begin work for the employer 
        after December 31, 1992.

                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 23.1








CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING
FIRM





To the Board of Directors and Stockholders
of


Del Global Technologies Corp.


Roselle, Illinois





We consent to the incorporation by reference in
Registration Statements on Form S-8 (No 333-38024, No. 333-69723, No. 033-09133,
No. 033-65439, No. 033-78910, No. 033-52088, and No. 033-19772), on Form S-1
(No. 333-113866) and on Form S-3 (No. 333-38042) of Del Global Technologies
Corp. of our report datedNovember 4, 2009,
relating to the consolidated financial statements which appears in this Annual
Report on Form 10-K.








/s/ BDO SEIDMAN, LLP





Chicago, Illinois





November
9, 2009
This site uses Cascading Style Sheets to present information. Therefore, it may not display properly when disabled.

This site requires Javascript enabled to retrieve and display data.

# U.S. Census Bureau		United States Population Growth by Region
CTS Corporation
 Form 10-K 2010
 
 ­­­­
 EXHIBIT (23)(a)
 
   
 
 CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERERD PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
  
 We have issued our report dated February 23, 2011, with respect to the consolidated financial statements, schedule, and internal control over financial reporting included in the Annual Report of CTS Corporation and Subsidiaries on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010.  We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of said report in the Registration Statements of CTS Corporation on Form S-3 (No. 333-72146, effective November 9, 2001) and on Forms S-8 (Nos. 333-159542, effective May 28, 2009, and 333-116287, effective June 8, 2004).
 
 
 
 /s/ GRANT THORNTON LLP
 Chicago, Illinois
 February 23, 2011
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

February 2, 2023

No. 04-22-00621-CV

Donald LEMPAR,

Appellant

v.

Patrick BALLANTYNE, Cynthia Orr, Goldstein & Orr, PLLC,

Appellees

From the 166th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2022CI05174

Honorable Angelica Jimenez, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

 Appellant’s motion for an extension of time to file his reply brief in response to 

Appellee Ballantyne’s brief is GRANTED. Appellant’s reply brief is due on or before February 

15, 2023.

_________________________________

Liza A. Rodriguez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 2nd day of February, 2023.

___________________________________

MICHAEL A. CRUZ, Clerk of Court
254 La. 795

#### BARNETT HOME APPLIANCE CORPORATION v. Henry A. GUIDRY, Jr., Henry A. Guidry, Sr.

No. 50036.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Oct. 14, 1969.

In re: Henry A. Guidry, Sr., applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, Parish of St. Martin. 224 So.2d 134.

Writ refused. On the facts found by the Court of Appeal, the result is correct.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                          18,155
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                          65,967
<DEPRECIATION>                                   4,999
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  85,432
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                         42,441
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            15
<OTHER-SE>                                      41,103
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    85,432
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                10,732
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    5,286
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 1,890
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               4,021
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 17,922
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             17,922
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    17,922
<EPS-BASIC>                                      11.70
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    11.70


</TABLE>
# CITY OF BRAWLEY

February 12, 2015 Mr. Scott Faulk U.S. Department ofTransportation 1200 New JerseyAvenue, SE Washington, DC 20590 ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES 383 Main Street Brawley, CA 92227 Phone: (760) 351-3048 FAX: (760) 351-3088

Re: Essential Air Service Eligibility- Imperial County Airport (California) Mr

. Faulk: On behalf ofthe City of Brawley, thank you for the opportunity to retain the Essential Air Service ("EAS") Program at the Imperial County Airport ("IPL"). The purpose of this letter is to reiterate the significant need for the continuance of the EAS Program in our community. The City of Brawley is committed to the Program's success and fully understands the importance ofthe resource. We look forward to supporting continued growth in enplanements. Sincerely,



# ~--- I. 

# ;!:._
George A. Nava Mayor
# C_2013075EN.01000701.xml

| 14.3.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 75/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.3.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 75/7

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

13 March 2013

2013/C 75/03

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,2981 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 124,59 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4570 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,86780 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 8,2931 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,2319 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 7,4430 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 25,632 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 305,65 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,7012 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,1385 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,3890 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,3510 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,2573 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,3304 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 10,0695 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,5730 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,6202 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 433,78 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 11,9595 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 8,0667 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,5865 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 12 580,03 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,0345 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 52,627 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 39,9200 |
| THB | Thai baht | 38,424 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 2,5440 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 16,0835 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 70,4950 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,2981

JPY

Japanese yen

124,59

DKK

Danish krone

7,4570

GBP

Pound sterling

0,86780

SEK

Swedish krona

8,2931

CHF

Swiss franc

1,2319

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

7,4430

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

25,632

HUF

Hungarian forint

305,65

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,7012

PLN

Polish zloty

4,1385

RON

Romanian leu

4,3890

TRY

Turkish lira

2,3510

AUD

Australian dollar

1,2573

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,3304

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

10,0695

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,5730

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,6202

KRW

South Korean won

1 433,78

ZAR

South African rand

11,9595

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

8,0667

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,5865

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

12 580,03

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,0345

PHP

Philippine peso

52,627

RUB

Russian rouble

39,9200

THB

Thai baht

38,424

BRL

Brazilian real

2,5440

MXN

Mexican peso

16,0835

INR

Indian rupee

70,4950

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---