```

[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 38 (Wednesday, February 26, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 10799-10800]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-04174]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[Petition IV-2011-1; FRL-9907-12-Region 9]

Clean Air Act Operating Permit Program; Petition for Objection to 
State Operating Permit for Hu Honua Bioenergy Facility, LLC; Pepeekeo, 
Hawaii

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice of final order on petition to object to a state 
operating permit.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Pursuant to Clean Air Act (CAA) Section 505(b)(2) and 40 CFR 
70.8(d), the EPA Administrator signed an Order, dated February 7, 2014, 
partially granting and partially denying a petition to object to a CAA 
title V operating permit proposed by the Clean Air Branch, 
Environmental Management Division, Hawaii Department of Health (HDOH) 
for the Hu Honua Bioenergy Facility, LLC (Hu Honua) in Pepeekeo, 
Hawaii. For the Issues that EPA denied, the Order constitutes a final 
action on the petition submitted by the Law Office of Marc Chytilo, on 
behalf of Preserve Pepeekeo Health & Environment (Petitioner), on 
August 26, 2011. Pursuant to section 505(b)(2) of the CAA, a petitioner 
may seek judicial review in the United States Court of Appeals for the 
appropriate circuit of those portions of the petition which EPA denied. 
Any petition for review shall be filed within 60 days from the date 
this notice appears in the Federal

[[Page 10800]]

Register, pursuant to section 307 of the CAA.

ADDRESSES: Copies of the Order, the petition, and all pertinent 
information relating thereto are on file at the following location: EPA 
Region 9; Air Division; 75 Hawthorne Street; San Francisco, California 
94105.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Gerardo Rios, Air Permits Office, EPA 
Region 9, at (415) 972-3974 or rios.gerardo@epa.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The CAA affords EPA a 45-day period to 
review and, as appropriate, the authority to object to operating 
permits proposed by state permitting authorities under title V of the 
CAA, 42 U.S.C. 7661-7661f. Section 505(b)(2) of the CAA and 40 CFR 
70.8(d) authorize any person to petition the EPA Administrator to 
object to a title V operating permit within 60 days after the 
expiration of EPA's 45-day review period if EPA has not objected on its 
own initiative. Petitions must be based only on objections to the 
permit that were raised with reasonable specificity during the public 
comment period provided by the state, unless the petitioner 
demonstrates that it was impracticable to raise these issues during the 
comment period or the grounds for the issues arose after this period.
    The petitioner submitted a petition regarding Hu Honua on August 
26, 2011, requesting that EPA object to the CAA title V operating 
permit, identified as Covered Source Permit Number 0724-01-C. The 
Petitioner alleged that the permit was not consistent with the CAA 
because: (1) EPA raised objectionable issues in its comment letter on 
the proposed permit; (2) the permit fails to ensure compliance with 
criteria air pollutant emission limits; (3) the permit fails to ensure 
compliance with Best Available Control Technology (BACT) requirements 
for CO; (4) the permit fails to ensure compliance with hazardous air 
pollutant (HAP) emission limits; (5) the baghouse is not adequately 
described or monitored; (6) the permit fails to ensure compliance with 
applicable state law and State Implementation Plan (SIP) requirements; 
(7) the permit fails to ensure compliance with Maximum Achievable 
Control Technology (MACT) requirements for major sources of HAPs; (8) 
the permit impermissibly exempts startups and shutdowns from emissions 
limits; (9) the facility's biomass handling, chipping, and storage 
operations do not qualify as an ``insignificant activity''; (10) the 
permit fails to address emissions from trona or lime and ash handling; 
(11) HDOH failed to address ammonia slip and sulfuric acid mist 
emissions; (12) HDOH failed to directly regulate and evaluate the 
impacts of PM2.5; and (13) HDOH failed to adequately respond 
to significant public comments.
    On February 7, 2014, the Administrator issued an Order partially 
granting and partially denying the petition. The Order explains EPA's 
rationale for partially granting and partially denying the petition.

    Dated: February 11, 2014.
Jared Blumenfeld,
Regional Administrator, Region IX.
[FR Doc. 2014-04174 Filed 2-25-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
```