alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2013228EN.01000302.xml

| 7.8.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 228/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.8.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 228/3

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.6986 — Bain Capital/Maisons du Monde)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2013/C 228/04

On 31 July 2013, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32013M6986. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32013M6986. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.

---
U.S. flag
              An official website of the United States government





---

close


Denmark
 Basic Facts Population
 People per sq. km
 Males per 100 females
 Children per woman
 Goods exported from U.S.
 Goods imported to U.S.
 Change in exports from U.S. for 2013 to 2022
 A Closer Look Source
 Comparisons
 Compared to the U.S.
 Compared to the World
 K = Thousands
				M = Millions
				B = Billions
  Merchandise Trade U.S. Trade in Manufactured Goods
 Top Exported Goods by U.S. State or Territory
 Population Current and Projected Population
 Population by Age and Sex
 Source and Notes Source: U.S. Census Bureau, International Database (demographic data) and USA Trade Online (trade data); Central Intelligence Agency, The World Fact Book (country reference maps). This application presents data for 228 countries and areas of the world with a 2024 population of 5,000 or more. For eleven of those countries and areas, only demographic data are presented. "Data not available" indicates that data are not available from this application.  In such instances, data may be available elsewhere at the census.gov website. Trade figures presented for France do not include data for overseas departments French Guiana, Guadeloupe, Martinique, Mayotte, and Reunion but do include data for dependencies Saint Barthelemy and Saint Martin.  Trade figures for the United Kingdom include data for crown dependencies Guernsey, Isle of Man, and Jersey. To learn more about world population projections, go to Notes on the World Population Clock. To learn more about international trade data, go to Guide to Foreign Trade Statistics. All trade figures are in U.S. dollars on a nominal basis.


CONNECT WITH US
 Information Quality
                    Data Linkage Infrastructure
                    Data Protection and Privacy Policy
                    Accessibility      
                    FOIA
                    Inspector General
                    No FEAR Act
                    U.S. Department of Commerce
                    USA.gov
  Measuring America's People, Places, and Economy
#### Martin J. SHAUGNESSY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 71-632.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Sept. 16, 1971.

Appeal from Court of Record, Broward County; Neis R. Pearson, Judge.

Appeal dismissed.
#### Rex A. STAGE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 70-629.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Sept. 22, 1970.

Appeal dismissed.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Transportation

###### Federal Highway Administration

# AGENCY:

Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), Department of Transportation (DOT).

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The FHWA is issuing this notice to advise the public that we are rescinding the September 26, 2013, NOI to prepare an EIS for a proposed project, the I-90 Tolling Project, to manage congestion and traffic flow on I-90 between I-5 and I-405, and contribute revenue to the sustainable, long-term funding for timely completion of the SR 520 Bridge Replacement and HOV Program and maintenance and future transportation improvements on I-90.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Lindsey Handel, Urban Transportation Engineer, Federal Highway Administration, Washington Division, 711 S. Capitol Way, Suite 501, Olympia, WA 98501; telephone: 360-753-9550; and email: *lindsey.handel@dot.gov.*

      ( print page 41142)    

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

On September 26, 2013, FHWA published a Notice of Intent to prepare an EIS for the I-90 Tolling Project to manage congestion and traffic flow on I-90 between I-5 and I-405, and contribute revenue to the sustainable, long-term funding for timely completion of the SR 520 Bridge Replacement and HOV Program and maintenance and future transportation improvements on I-90. The passage of the Connecting Washington state funding package in 2015 provided sufficient funding to complete the SR 520 Bridge Replacement, eliminating part of the purpose for this project. Any futureI-90 tolling projects will progress under a separate environmental review process in accordance with all applicable laws and regulations.

Issued on: August 13, 2018.

Daniel M. Mathis,

FHWA Division Administrator, Olympia, WA.

[FR Doc. 2018-17757 Filed 8-16-18; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910-RY-P
# C_2013001EN.01001201.xml

| 4.1.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 1/12 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.1.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 1/12

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

31 December 2012

2013/C 1/03

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,3194 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 113,61 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,461 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,8161 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 8,582 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,2072 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 7,3483 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 25,151 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 292,3 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,6977 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,074 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,4445 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,3551 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,2712 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,3137 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 10,226 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,6045 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,6111 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 406,23 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 11,1727 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 8,2207 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,5575 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 12 713,97 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,0347 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 54,107 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 40,3295 |
| THB | Thai baht | 40,347 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 2,7036 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 17,1845 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 72,56 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,3194

JPY

Japanese yen

113,61

DKK

Danish krone

7,461

GBP

Pound sterling

0,8161

SEK

Swedish krona

8,582

CHF

Swiss franc

1,2072

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

7,3483

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

25,151

HUF

Hungarian forint

292,3

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,6977

PLN

Polish zloty

4,074

RON

Romanian leu

4,4445

TRY

Turkish lira

2,3551

AUD

Australian dollar

1,2712

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,3137

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

10,226

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,6045

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,6111

KRW

South Korean won

1 406,23

ZAR

South African rand

11,1727

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

8,2207

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,5575

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

12 713,97

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,0347

PHP

Philippine peso

54,107

RUB

Russian rouble

40,3295

THB

Thai baht

40,347

BRL

Brazilian real

2,7036

MXN

Mexican peso

17,1845

INR

Indian rupee

72,56

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
In the United States Court of Federal Claims 

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS 

No. 17-809V 

 Filed: January 30, 2018 

UNPUBLISHED 

TERESA FOWLER, 

 Petitioner, 

v. 

SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND 

HUMAN SERVICES, 

 Respondent. 

Special Processing Unit (SPU); 

Ruling on Entitlement; Concession; 

Table Injury; Influenza (Flu) Vaccine; 

Shoulder Injury Related to Vaccine 

Administration (SIRVA) 

   

Ronald Craig Homer, Conway, Homer, P.C., Boston, MA, for petitioner. 

Justine Elizabeth Walters, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent. 

RULING ON ENTITLEMENT1

Dorsey, Chief Special Master: 

 On June 15, 2017, petitioner filed a petition for compensation under the National 

Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq.,

2 (the “Vaccine 

Act”). Petitioner alleges that she suffered from a shoulder injury related to vaccine 

administration (“SIRVA”) following an influenza (“flu”) vaccination administered on 

October 20, 2014. Petition at 1. The case was assigned to the Special Processing Unit 

of the Office of Special Masters. 

On January 29, 2018, respondent filed his Rule 4(c) report in which he concedes 

that petitioner is entitled to compensation in this case. Respondent’s Rule 4(c) Report 

at 1. Specifically, respondent concluded that petitioner’s claim meets the criteria for a 

SIRVA, and that petitioner is entitled to a presumption of causation Id. at 6. 

                                                            

1 Because this unpublished ruling contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, the 

undersigned intends to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website, in accordance with 

the E-Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of 

Electronic Government Services). In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), petitioner has 14 days to 

identify and move to redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an 

unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, the undersigned agrees that the identified material fits 

within this definition, the undersigned will redact such material from public access. 

2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for 

ease of citation, all “§” references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. § 

300aa (2012). 
Respondent further agrees that, in light of the information contained in the record, 

entitlement to compensation is appropriate under the terms of the Vaccine Act. Id. at 6-

7. 

 In view of respondent’s position and the evidence of record, the 

undersigned finds that petitioner is entitled to compensation. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

 s/Nora Beth Dorsey 

 Nora Beth Dorsey 

 Chief Special Master
EXHIBIT 32.1


                           SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                               SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In  connection  with the  Quarterly  Report  of  Creative  Bakeries,  Inc.  (the
"Company") on form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2004, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on or about the date hereof, I Ronald Schutte
President and Chief  Executive  Officer of the Company  certify,  pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge, that

      (i)   the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) and
            Section  15(d) of the  Securities  Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
            and

      (ii)  the  information  contained  in the Report  fairly  present,  in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company at the dates and for the periods indicated.


Date: May 24, 2004
                                          /s/ Ronald Schutte
                                          -----------------------------------
                                          Ronald Schutte
                                          President and Chief Executive Officer




A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the  electronic  version of this written  statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to Creative  Bakeries,  Inc. and will
be retained by and furnished to the Securities  and Exchange  Commissions or its
staff upon request.
EXHIBIT A 
 
Report of Independent Accounts 
 
To the Shareholders and 
  Board of Directors 
Pharmacia & Upjohn, Inc. 
 
We have reviewed the condensed consolidated balance sheet of Pharmacia &  
Upjohn, Inc. and subsidiaries as of March 31, 1998, and the related  
condensed consolidated statements of earnings and cash flows for the  
three month period ended March 31, 1998 and 1997.  These financial  
statements are the responsibility of the company's management. 
 
We conducted our review in accordance with standards established by the  
American Institute of Certified Public Accountants.  A review of interim  
financial information consists principally of applying analytical  
procedures to financial data and making inquiries of persons responsible  
for financial and accounting matters.  It is substantially less in scope  
that an audit conducted in accordance with generally accepted auditing  
standards, the objective of which is the expression of an opinion  
regarding the financial statements taken as a whole.  Accordingly, we do  
not express such an opinion. 
 
Based on our review, we are not aware of any material modifications that  
should be made to the condensed consolidated financial statements  
referred to above, for them to be in conformity with generally accepted  
accounting principles. 
 
We have previously audited, in accordance with generally accepted  
auditing standards, the consolidated balance sheet as of December 31,  
1997, and the related consolidated statements of earnings, shareholders'  
equity, and cash flows for the year then ended (not presented herein);  
and in our report, dated February 17, 1998, we expressed an unqualified  
opinion on those consolidated financial statements.  In our opinion, the  
information set forth in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance  
sheet as of December 31, 1997, is fairly stated, in all material  
respects, in relation to the consolidated balance sheet from which it  
has been derived. 
 
 
                                    Coopers & Lybrand L.L.P. 
 
Chicago, Illinois 
April 27, 1997
#### Marcia Lynn CHRISTY, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 70-1234.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

June 8, 1971.

Rehearing Denied July 9, 1971.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3086 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3086

         To reduce the size of the Federal civilian workforce.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 15, 1993

 Mr. Franks of New Jersey (for himself and Mr. Boehner) introduced the 
 following bill; which was referred jointly to the Committees on Post 
           Office and Civil Service and House Administration

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
         To reduce the size of the Federal civilian workforce.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Government Employee Limitation 
Act''.

SEC. 2. REDUCTION IN FEDERAL CIVILIAN WORKFORCE.

    (a) Definition.--For purposes of this section, the term ``civilian 
employees in the executive branch'' means all civilian employees within 
the executive branch of the Government (other than in the United States 
Postal Service or the Postal Rate Commission).
    (b) Limitations.--The average total number of civilian employees in 
the executive branch may not exceed--
            (1) 2,095,600 in fiscal year 1994;
            (2) 2,045,200 in fiscal year 1995;
            (3) 1,994,800 in fiscal year 1996;
            (4) 1,994,400 in fiscal year 1997; or
            (5) 1,894,000 in fiscal year 1998.
    (c) Averaging.--The average total number of civilian employees in 
the executive branch in a fiscal year shall, for purposes of this 
section, be the average number in such fiscal year, as determined under 
regulations prescribed under subsection (e). Any such average shall be 
determined on a ``full-time equivalent'' basis.
    (d) Voluntary Measures.--To the extent practicable, any reductions 
necessary to achieve compliance with any limitation under subsection 
(b) shall be effected through attrition or other voluntary measures.
    (e) Regulations.--The President shall prescribe regulations to 
carry out this section.

SEC. 3. SENSE OF THE HOUSE.

    (a) In General.--It is the sense of the House of Representatives 
that appropriate measures should be taken to provide that, effective 
beginning with the 104th Congress, the maximum number of permanent 
positions authorized for each Member under the Clerk Hire Allowance 
shall not exceed the number which is 2 less than the maximum number so 
authorized for the 103d Congress.
    (b) Definition.--For the purpose of this section, the term 
``Member'' means a Member of the House of Representatives, a Delegate 
to the House of Representatives, and the Resident Commissioner from 
Puerto Rico.

                                 <all>
```
#### Mrs. Carolyn BALDWIN, Appellant, v. JOHN HULSEBOSCH & ASSOCIATES, d/b/a Snelling & Snelling, Appellees.

No. 46529.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

Feb. 15, 1972.

Rehearing Denied March 27, 1972.

Barnett, Montgomery, McClintock & Cunningham, Jackson, for appellant.

Stennett, Wilkinson & Ward, James A. Peden, Jr., Jackson, for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
#### Roy D. NICHOLS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 69-219.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Second District.

Oct. 1, 1969.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

February 18, 2004

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 03-40903

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

HECTOR GARCIA-CAMACHO,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. B-03-CR-193-ALL

--------------------

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, EMILIO M. GARZA, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Hector Garcia-Camacho appeals the sentence imposed following

his guilty plea conviction of being found in the United States

after deportation/removal in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. 

Garcia-Camacho contends that the “felony” and “aggravated felony”

provisions of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(1) and (2) are unconstitutional. 

He therefore argues that his conviction must be reduced to one

under the lesser included offense found in 8 U.S.C. § 1362(a),

his judgment must be reformed to reflect a conviction only under
No. 03-40903

-2-

that provision, and his sentence must be vacated and the case

remanded for resentencing to no more than two years’ imprisonment

and one year of supervised release. 

In Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 235

(1998), the Supreme Court held that the enhanced penalties in

8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) are sentencing provisions, not elements of

separate offenses. The Court further held that the sentencing

provisions do not violate the Due Process Clause. Id. at 239-47. 

Garcia-Camacho acknowledges that his arguments are foreclosed by

Almendarez-Torres, but asserts that the decision has been cast

into doubt by Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 490 (2000). 

He seeks to preserve his arguments for further review. 

Apprendi did not overrule Almendarez-Torres. See Apprendi,

530 U.S. at 489-90; United States v. Dabeit, 231 F.3d 979, 984

(5th Cir. 2000). This court must follow Almendarez-Torres

“unless and until the Supreme Court itself determines to overrule

it.” Dabeit, 231 F.3d at 984 (internal quotation marks and

citation omitted). The judgment of the district court is

AFFIRMED.

The Government has moved for a summary affirmance in lieu of

filing an appellee’s brief. In its motion, the Government asks

that an appellee’s brief not be required. The motion is GRANTED. 

AFFIRMED; MOTION GRANTED.