alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2014147EN.01000401.xml

| 16.5.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 147/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.5.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 147/4

---

Opinion of the Advisory Committee on restrictive agreements and dominant position Meeting on 17 February 2014 concerning a preliminary draft decision relating Case C.39398 Visa MIF

Rapporteur: Malta

2014/C 147/04

| (1) | The Advisory Committee shares the Commission’s concerns expressed in its draft Decision as communicated to the Advisory Committee on 5 February 2014 under Article 101 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (‘TFEU’) and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

The Advisory Committee shares the Commission’s concerns expressed in its draft Decision as communicated to the Advisory Committee on 5 February 2014 under Article 101 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (‘TFEU’) and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement.

| (2) | The Advisory Committee agrees with the Commission that the proceedings concerning Visa Europe can be concluded by means of a decision pursuant to Article 9(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1/2003. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

The Advisory Committee agrees with the Commission that the proceedings concerning Visa Europe can be concluded by means of a decision pursuant to Article 9(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1/2003.

| (3) | The Advisory Committee agrees with the Commission that the commitments offered by Visa Europe are suitable, necessary and proportionate and should be made legally binding on Visa Europe. |
| --- | --- |

(3)

The Advisory Committee agrees with the Commission that the commitments offered by Visa Europe are suitable, necessary and proportionate and should be made legally binding on Visa Europe.

| (4) | The Advisory Committee agrees with the Commission that, in light of the commitments offered by Visa Europe, there are no longer grounds for action by the Commission against Visa Europe, without prejudice to Article 9(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1/2003. |
| --- | --- |

(4)

The Advisory Committee agrees with the Commission that, in light of the commitments offered by Visa Europe, there are no longer grounds for action by the Commission against Visa Europe, without prejudice to Article 9(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1/2003.

| (5) | The Advisory Committee asks the Commission to take into account any other points raised during the discussion. |
| --- | --- |

(5)

The Advisory Committee asks the Commission to take into account any other points raised during the discussion.

| (6) | The Advisory Committee recommends the publication of its opinion in the Official Journal of the European Union. |
| --- | --- |

(6)

The Advisory Committee recommends the publication of its opinion in the Official Journal of the European Union.

Official Journal of the European Union

---
#### STATE of Florida ex rel. Jose A. NOVOA and Pedro Franco, Relators, v. Honorable Murray GOODMAN, as Judge of the Criminal Court of Record in and for Dade County, Florida, Respondent.

No. 71-744.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

July 7, 1971.

PER CURIAM.

Prohibition dismissed.
#### Harold Milton CHALLIS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 214.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Fourth District.

Feb. 2, 1967.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
Certification of CFO Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                            (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

      In connection with the annual report of DataMetrics Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ending October 31, 2003 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Rafik
Moursalien, Controller of the Company, does hereby certify, pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350), that to my knowledge:

            (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

            (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.

                                        DATAMETRICS CORPORATION

                                        By: /s/ Rafik Moursalien
                                            ------------------------------------
                                            Rafik Moursalien, Controller

                                            Dated: September 30, 2005
EXHIBIT
14





CODE
OF ETHICS AND BUSINESS CONDUCT


CROFF
ENTERPRISES, INC.





The Company has adopted this Code of
Ethics and Business Conduct, applicable to the Company’s principal executive
officer, principal accounting officer and/or controller, principal financial
officer, and any persons performing similar functions.





●We shall at
all times comply with all applicable governmental laws, rules and
regulations.





●We shall
provide full, fair, accurate, timely, and understandable disclosure in reports
and documents that we file with, or submit to, the Securities and Exchange
Commission and in other public communications.





●We shall
conduct ourselves and our business in an honest and ethical manner.





●We reject
bribery in all its forms.





●We shall
provide sufficient information to enable customers and others to make their own
informed decisions.





●We shall
not advertise in a false or misleading manner.





●We shall
respect all requests for confidentiality of information.





●We shall be
alert to situations that might cause a conflict of interest or have the
appearance of a conflict and shall provide full disclosure when an actual or
apparent conflict of interest arises and shall ethically handle any actual or
apparent conflict of interest between personal and professional
relationships.





●We shall
promptly report any violation of this Code that we become aware of to the Board
of Directors of the Company.
Scott E. Sayre 

7750 Tecumseh Trail 

Cincinnati, Ohio 45243 

Email: t34pilot@cinci.rr.com Cell: 513-315-9333 

6/9/2015 

US Department of Transportation, Docket Operations 

West Building, Ground Floor, Room W12-140 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE 

Washington, DC 20590 

RE: Request for Exemption 

Dear Folks, 

Via Certified Receipt Mail 

~··: i . 

I am a "person" and hereby request an exemption to 14CFR, Federal Aviation Regulation 91.881, civil subsonic jet airplanes weighing 

75,000 pounds or less. This regulation is in regard to stage 3 noise compliance. Effective date December 31, 2015. 

I am type rated in a Morane Saulnier MS-760 airplane. I fly several ofthese aircraft. I hold an Airline Transport Pilot certificate# 

2123029. 

In the docket for rule making for this regulatory change, this make and model was excluded from the FAA analysis. The docket 

number is FAA-2013-0503; Arndt. No. 91.328. 

This make and model airplane has a gross weight of8,750 pounds and thereby is a small aircraft, under 12,500 pounds. This aircraft is 

a twin engine jet powered airplane. This airplane was certified in the United States July 1958. Type Certificate number 7A3. 

This airplane is clearly listed in FAA Advisory Circular 36-3H. change 1, dated 5/25/2012, Estimated Airplane Noise Levels in AWeighed Decibels. The data provided in this AC was provided by DGAC (French Aviation Authority) as noted in the AC. The noise 

levels are within the stage 3 noise compliance requirements. The operation of these aircraft will not be in any conflict with stage 3 

noise regulations. 

The FAA Approved Airplane Flight Manual does not contain data regarding Stage 3 compliance. The present flight manual is dated 

April1963. This exemption has no effect on safety. 

This airplane is the first Very Light Jet (VLJ) and has historical roots. These airplanes operate for personal transportation oftheir 

respective owners and also are frequently taken to "Airshows" for display to the general public. 

This new regulation takes effect December 31, 2015. Exemption to this regulation is needed before this date to allow for recurrent 

training and normal operations of these airplanes in the National Airspace System. 

Summary: An Exemption is hereby granted to Scott E. Sayre, holder of Airline Transport Pilot certificate 2123029 to operate Morane 

Saulnier MS-760 series aircraft to and from any suitable airports in the contiguous United States. 

Thank you for your assistance in this matter.
CERTIFICATION OF CFO PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                            (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

      In connection with the annual report of DataMetrics Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ending October 31, 2004 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Rafik
Moursalien, Controller of the Company, does hereby certify, pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350), that to my knowledge:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.

DATAMETRICS CORPORATION


By: /s/ Rafik Moursalien
   -------------------------------------
        Rafik Moursalien, Controller

Dated: February 17, 2006
      ----------------------------------
An official website of the United States government                

----

end of header

Census.govNewsroom

# Newsroom Archive

Skip left menu navigation                          - About the Newsroom
                          - Facts for Features
                          - **News Releases**
                          - Press Kits
                          - Tip Sheets

## Andrew W. Hait

### *U.S. Census Bureau*

Andrew W. Hait is a Survey Statistician/Economist in the Economic Planning and Coordination Division at the U.S. Census Bureau.  With 25 years of service at the Bureau, Andy oversees and coordinates the data products and data user training for the Economic Census and survey programs. He also is the lead geographic specialist in the Economic Programs directorate. Andy holds a bachelor's degree in Economics from Syracuse University and has a Masters Certificate in Project Management from George Washington University.

CONNECT WITH US**********

                            - Information Quality
                            - Data Linkage Infrastructure
                            - Data Protection and Privacy Policy
                            - Accessibility
                            - FOIA
                            - Inspector General
                            - No FEAR Act
                            - U.S. Department of Commerce
                            - USA.gov

----

Measuring America's People, Places, and Economy

Is this page helpful?
YesNo

NO THANKS

255 characters maximum255 characters maximum reached

Thank you for your feedback.Comments or suggestions? 

PIO@census.gov
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Elizabeth A. Weaver

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

July 26, 2010 

s0719 

Order 

 

July 26, 2010 

140276 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 140276 

 COA: 294275 

Wayne CC: 05-003395 

JOSEPH ALLEN PALMER, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the November 18, 2009 

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-6540

FRANKIE L. BATTLE,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

VIVIAN REYNOLDS, individually and in her official capacity as jailhouse chief supervisor

officer of Marion County jailhouse in the city

of Marion County within the state of South

Carolina; HOWARD GELESPY; KENNY DAVIS; THOMAS

S. PAYNE, III; DOCTOR DERWELL; DOCTOR BECK;

DOCTOR BLANTON; SAMUEL J. FRIEDMAN; J. NURSE;

MARION COUNTY, individually and in their

official capacity as a municipal corporation

organized under and pursuant to the laws of

the state of South Carolina; MARION COUNTY,

Jailhouse Supervisors in the offices or commissioner, individually and in their official

capacity as the local governing entity policy

maker of South Carolina and in their supervisory roles for the county of Marion, South

Carolina,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Charleston. Henry M. Herlong, Jr., District

Judge. (CA-94-2254-20-AJ)

Submitted: August 22, 1996 Decided: September 5, 1996

Before RUSSELL, HALL, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.
2

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Frankie L. Battle, Appellant Pro Se. L. Hunter Limbaugh, WILLCOX,

MCLEOD, BUYCK, BAKER & WILLIAMS, P.A., Florence, South Carolina,

for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
3

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals the district court's order dismissing his 42

U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint. Appellant's case was referred to a

magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) (1988). The

magistrate judge recommended that relief be denied and advised

Appellant that failure to file timely objections to this recommendation could waive appellate review of a district court order based

upon the recommendation. Despite this warning, Appellant failed to

object to the magistrate judge's recommendation.

The timely filing of objections to a magistrate judge's

recommendation is necessary to preserve appellate review of the

substance of that recommendation when the parties have been warned

that failure to object will waive appellate review. Wright v.

Collins, 766 F.2d 841, 845-46 (4th Cir. 1985). See generally Thomas

v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140 (1985). Appellant has waived appellate review

by failing to file objections after receiving proper notice.

Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court. We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
# C_2012029EN.01000101.xml

| 2.2.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 29/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.2.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 29/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.6449 — DCC Energy/Swea Energi)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2012/C 29/01

On 27 January 2012, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32012M6449. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32012M6449. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.

---
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 3240

To amend title 38, United States Code, to eliminate the terms for appointment for members of the Board of Veterans Appeals and to ensure

pay equity between those members and administrative law judges.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

OCTOBER 7, 1993

Mr. EVANS introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee

on Veterans’ Affairs

A BILL

To amend title 38, United States Code, to eliminate the

terms for appointment for members of the Board of

Veterans Appeals and to ensure pay equity between those

members and administrative law judges.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. ELIMINATION OF TERMS OF APPOINTMENT

4 FOR MEMBERS OF THE BOARD OF VETERANS

5 APPEALS.

6 Section 7101(b) of title 38, United States Code, is

7 amended—
2

•HR 3240 IH

1 (1) by striking out the second sentence of para2 graph (2);

3 (2) by striking out paragraph (3); and

4 (3) by redesignating paragraph (4) as para5 graph (3).

6 SEC. 2. PAY OF MEMBERS OF THE BOARD OF VETERANS

7 APPEALS.

8 (a) Section 7101(b) of title 38, United States Code,

9 as amended by section 1, is further amended by adding

10 at the end the following:

11 ‘‘(4) A member of the Board (other than the Chair12 man and Vice Chairman) shall receive compensation and

13 other benefits equivalent to those payable to an adminis14 trative law judge under section 5372 of title 5.’’.

15 (b) The rate of basic pay payable to an individual

16 who is a member of the Board of Veterans Appeals on

17 the date of the enactment of this Act may not be reduced

18 by reason of this Act below the rate payable to such indi19 vidual on the day before the effective date specified in sec20 tion 3.

21 SEC. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE.

22 The amendments made by sections 1 and 2 shall take

23 effect on the first day of the first pay period beginning

24 after the date of the enactment of this Act.

Æ
# C_2012376EN.01000201.xml

| 6.12.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 376/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.12.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 376/2

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

5 December 2012

2012/C 376/02

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,3065 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 107,31 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4599 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,81190 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 8,6510 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,2128 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 7,3560 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 25,218 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 282,62 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,6965 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,1198 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,5445 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,3350 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,2483 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,2960 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 10,1255 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,5826 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,5921 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 414,07 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 11,4554 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 8,1395 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,5200 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 12 582,01 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 3,9735 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 53,378 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 40,2670 |
| THB | Thai baht | 40,083 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 2,7511 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 16,9098 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 71,2780 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,3065

JPY

Japanese yen

107,31

DKK

Danish krone

7,4599

GBP

Pound sterling

0,81190

SEK

Swedish krona

8,6510

CHF

Swiss franc

1,2128

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

7,3560

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

25,218

HUF

Hungarian forint

282,62

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,6965

PLN

Polish zloty

4,1198

RON

Romanian leu

4,5445

TRY

Turkish lira

2,3350

AUD

Australian dollar

1,2483

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,2960

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

10,1255

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,5826

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,5921

KRW

South Korean won

1 414,07

ZAR

South African rand

11,4554

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

8,1395

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,5200

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

12 582,01

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

3,9735

PHP

Philippine peso

53,378

RUB

Russian rouble

40,2670

THB

Thai baht

40,083

BRL

Brazilian real

2,7511

MXN

Mexican peso

16,9098

INR

Indian rupee

71,2780

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
ex10a.htm
















Exhibit (10)(a)

















Consent of Ernst & Young LLP, Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm












We consent to the reference to our firm under the caption “Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm” in Post-Effective Amendment No. 18 to the 1933 Act Registration Statement (Form N-4 No. 333-171097) and Amendment No. 301 to the 1940 Act Registration Statement (Form N-4 No. 811-08441), and to the use therein of our reports dated (a) March 31, 2016, with respect to the financial statements of Lincoln Life & Annuity Company of New York and (b) April 12, 2016, with respect to the financial statements of Lincoln Life & Annuity Variable Annuity Account H for the interests in a separate account under individual flexible payment deferred variable annuity contracts.


 


/s/ Ernst & Young LLP



















Philadelphia, Pennsylvania


November 16, 2016
Final Listing of Questionnaire Files for Steam Electric Rulemaking Record

Plant ID 06910

Removed 

from Public 

(Non-CBI) 

Docket1

Copyright 

Flag2

File Name Description

x 06910\06910_Checklist_092910_version34.xls EPA Technical Review Checklist Workbook

06910\06910_Completeness_Checklist.xls EPA Completeness Review Checklist

06910\06910_HardcopyLog.doc EPA log of hardcopy documents submitted

x 06910\06910_PartA.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 06910\06910_PartB.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 06910\06910_PartC.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 06910\06910_PartD.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 06910\06910_PartE.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 06910\06910_PartH.xls Plant submitted survey file

06910\Certification Statement_06910.pdf Plant certification statement

x 06910\Supporting Documentation\06910_MAP-1 A5-2 Plant diagram.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

06910\Supporting Documentation\06910_MLPP Thermal Evaluation 26Aug03.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

06910\Supporting Documentation\06910_MLPPthermalSupp14Aug04.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 06910\Supporting Documentation\06910_WB-1 A5-3 Water balance diagram.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

1

 Final reviewed survey responses are located in the Steam Electric Technical Questionnaire Database . 

2

 Copyright documents are available from the docket.