Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 159 / Thursday, August 16, 2018 / Notices 40745 

1See Stainless Steel Flanges from India: 

Preliminary Affirmative Determination of Sales at 

Less Than Fair Value, Preliminary Affirmative 

Determination of Critical Circumstances, 

Postponement of Final Determination, and 

Extension of Provisional Measures, 83 FR 13246 

(March 28, 2018) (Preliminary Determination) and 

accompanying Preliminary Decision Memorandum 

(PDM). 

additional information may contact the 

Midwestern Regional Office at (312) 

353–8311. 

Records generated from this meeting 

may be inspected and reproduced at the 

Midwestern Regional Office, as they 

become available, both before and after 

the meeting. Records of the meeting will 

be available via www.facadatabase.gov 

under the Commission on Civil Rights, 

Illinois Advisory Committee link 

(http://www.facadatabase.gov/ 

committee/meetings.aspx?cid=246). 

Select ‘‘meeting details’’ and then 

‘‘documents’’ to download. Persons 

interested in the work of this Committee 

are directed to the Commission’s 

website, http://www.usccr.gov, or may 

contact the Midwestern Regional Office 

at the above email or street address. 

Agenda 

Welcome and Roll Call 

Discussion: Civil Rights in Illinois 

Public Comment 

Future Plans and Actions 

Adjournment 

Dated: August 10, 2018. 

David Mussatt, 

Supervisory Chief, Regional Programs Unit. 

[FR Doc. 2018–17643 Filed 8–15–18; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE P 

COMMISSION ON CIVIL RIGHTS 

Notice of Public Meeting of the Ohio 

Advisory Committee to the U.S. 

Commission on Civil Rights 

AGENCY: U.S. Commission on Civil 

Rights. 

ACTION: Announcement of meeting. 

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given, 

pursuant to the provisions of the rules 

and regulations of the U.S. Commission 

on Civil Rights (Commission) and the 

Federal Advisory Committee Act that 

the Ohio Advisory Committee 

(Committee) will hold a meeting via 

teleconference on Friday September 14, 

2018, from 9 a.m.–4 p.m. EDT for the 

purpose of hearing testimony regarding 

civil rights and education funding in the 

state. 

DATES: The meeting will be held on 

Friday September 14, 2018, from 9 a.m.– 

4 p.m. EDT. 

ADDRESSES: Cleveland State University, 

Fenn Tower, 1938 E 24th Street, 

Cleveland, OH 44115. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Melissa Wojnaroski, DFO, at 

mwojnaroski@usccr.gov or 312–353– 

8311. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This 

meeting is open to the public. An open 

comment period will be provided to 

allow members of the public to make a 

statement, beginning at 4 p.m. To 

request individual accommodations for 

persons with disabilities planning to 

attend, please contact the Regional 

Programs Unit at 312–353–8311 at least 

10 days prior to the meeting. Members 

of the public are also entitled to submit 

written comments; the comments must 

be received in the regional office within 

30 days following the meeting. Written 

comments may be mailed to the 

Regional Programs Unit, U.S. 

Commission on Civil Rights, 230 S 

Dearborn, Suite 2120, Chicago, IL 

60604. They may also be faxed to the 

Commission at (312) 353–8324, or 

emailed to Carolyn Allen at callen@

usccr.gov. Persons who desire 

additional information may contact the 

Regional Programs Unit at (312) 353– 

8311. 

The Committee intends to examine 

Ohio’s school funding formula and its 

impact on access to education on the 

basis of color, race, sex, religion, 

national origin, and/or disability status. 

The Committee will examine (a) the 

extent to which the state’s school 

funding formula may contribute to a 

disparate impact on educational access 

and outcomes on the basis of these 

federally protected categories, (b) if the 

policies and practices are reasonably 

necessary to the education success of 

the students or other aspects of the 

education system, and (c) alternative 

policies and practices with the 

demonstrated potential to address such 

concerns. The Committee will hear 

testimony from community members, 

advocates, academics, public and 

private school administrators, and 

government officials. 

Records generated from this meeting 

may be inspected and reproduced at the 

Regional Programs Unit Office, as they 

become available, both before and after 

the meeting. Records of the meeting will 

be available via www.facadatabase.gov 

under the Commission on Civil Rights, 

Ohio Advisory Committee link (http://

www.facadatabase.gov/committee/ 

meetings.aspx?cid=268). Persons 

interested in the work of this Committee 

are directed to the Commission’s 

website, http://www.usccr.gov, or may 

contact the Regional Programs Unit 

Office at the above email or street 

address. 

Agenda 

Opening Remarks and Introductions 

(9:00 a.m.–9:15 a.m.) 

Panel 1: Academic (9:15 a.m.–10:45 

a.m.) 

Panel 2: Private Schools & Public 

Charter Schools (11:00 a.m.–12:30 

p.m.) 

Break (12:30 p.m.–1:30 p.m.) 

Panel 3: Public Schools & Community 

(1:30 p.m.–3:00 p.m.) 

Open Forum (3:00 p.m.–4:00 p.m.) 

Closing Remarks (4:00 p.m.) 

Dated: August 13, 2018. 

David Mussatt, 

Supervisory Chief, Regional Programs Unit. 

[FR Doc. 2018–17706 Filed 8–15–18; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6335–01–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–533–877] 

Stainless Steel Flanges From India: 

Final Affirmative Determination of 

Sales at Less Than Fair Value and 

Final Affirmative Critical Circumstance 

Determination 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce 

(Commerce) determines that imports of 

stainless steel flanges from India are 

being, or are likely to be, sold in the 

United States at less than fair value 

(LTFV) during the period of 

investigation (POI) July 1, 2016, through 

June 30, 2017. 

DATES: Applicable August 16, 2018. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Benito Ballesteros or Christian Llinas, 

AD/CVD Operations, Office V, 

Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 

Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, 

DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–7425 or 

(202) 482–4877, respectively. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On March 28, 2018, Commerce 

published in the Federal Register the 

preliminary affirmative determination of 

sales at LTFV in the antidumping duty 

(AD) investigation of stainless steel 

flanges from India.1 The Coalition of 

American Flange Producers and its 

individual members, Core Pipe 

Products, Inc. and Maass Flange 

Corporation (collectively, the 

petitioners), Chandan Steel Limited 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES
40746 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 159 / Thursday, August 16, 2018 / Notices 

2See Memorandum, ‘‘Issues and Decision 

Memorandum for the Final Affirmative 

Determination in the Less-Than-Fair-Value 

Investigation of Stainless Steel Flanges from India,’’ 

dated concurrently with this determination and 

hereby adopted by this notice (Issues and Decision 

Memorandum or IDM). 

3See Antidumping Duties; Countervailing Duties, 

Final Rule, 62 FR 27296, 27323 (May 19, 1997). 4See Initiation Notice. 5The Echjay single entity is comprised of Echjay 

Forgings Pvt Limited, Echjay Industries Private 

Limited, Echjay Forging Industries Private Limited, 

and Spire Industries Pvt. Limited. 

6The Bebitz/Viraj single entity is comprised of 

Bebitz Flanges Works Private Limited, Viraj Profiles 

Limited (Viraj), Flanschen werk Bebitz GmbH 

(FBG), Bebitz USA, Inc. (Bebitz USA), and Viraj 

USA, Inc. (Viraj USA). 

(Chandan), Bebitz Flanges Works Pvt. 

Ltd. (Bebitz) and Echjay Forgings Pvt. 

Ltd. (Echjay) (collectively, the 

respondents) filed case and rebuttal 

briefs. A summary of the events that 

occurred since Commerce published the 

Preliminary Determination, as well as a 

full discussion of the issues raised by 

parties for this final determination, may 

be found in the accompanying Issues 

and Decision Memorandum.2 The Issues 

and Decision Memorandum is a public 

document, and is on file electronically 

via Enforcement and Compliance’s 

Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 

Centralized Electronic Service System 

(ACCESS). ACCESS is available to 

register users at http://access.trade.gov, 

and to all parties in the Central Records 

Unit, Room B8024 of the main 

Department of Commerce building. In 

addition, a complete version of the 

Issues and Decision Memorandum can 

be accessed directly at http://

enforcement.trade.gov. The signed and 

electronic versions of the Issues and 

Decision Memorandum are identical in 

content. 

Scope of the Investigation 

The product covered by this 

investigation is stainless steel flanges 

from India. For a complete description 

of the scope of this investigation, see 

Appendix I. 

Scope Comments 

In accordance with the preamble to 

Commerce’s regulations,3 the Initiation 

Notice set aside a period of time for 

parties to raise issues regarding product 

coverage (i.e., scope).4 As no interested 

parties submitted timely comments on 

the scope of this investigation, we made 

no changes to the scope language as it 

appeared in the Initiation Notice. 

Period of Investigation 

The period of investigation is July 1, 

2016, through June 30, 2017. 

Verification 

As provided in section 782(i) of the 

Act, between April and May 2018, 

Commerce verified the sales and cost 

data reported by Chandan. We used 

standard verification procedures, 

including an examination of relevant 

accounting and production records, and 

original source documents provided by 

the respondents. 

Analysis of Comments Received 

All issues raised in the case and 

rebuttal briefs that were submitted by 

interested parties in this investigation 

are addressed in the Issues and Decision 

Memorandum. A list of these issues is 

attached to this notice at Appendix II. 

Use of Facts Available and Adverse 

Facts Available 

For purposes of this final 

determination, Commerce determined 

the Echjay single entity’s 5 and the 

Bebitz/Viraj single entity’s 6 margin on 

the basis of adverse facts available, 

pursuant to sections 776(a)(2)(B)–(C) 

and 776(b) of the Act. For further 

information, see the Issues and Decision 

Memorandum. 

Changes Since the Preliminary 

Determination 

Based on our analysis of the 

comments received and our finding at 

verification, we made certain changes to 

the margin calculations. For a 

discussion of these changes, see the 

Issues and Decision Memorandum. 

Final Affirmative Determination of 

Critical Circumstances 

For the final determination, we 

continue to find that critical 

circumstances exist with respect to 

imports of stainless steel flanges from 

Chandan, the Bebitz/Viraj single entity, 

the Echjay single entity, and companies 

covered by the ‘‘all others’’ rate. Thus, 

pursuant to section 735(a)(3) of the Act, 

and 19 CFR 351.206, we find that 

critical circumstances exist with respect 

to subject merchandise produced or 

exported by Chandan, the Bebitz/Viraj 

single entity, the Echjay single entity, 

and ‘‘all others.’’ For further discussion, 

see the Issues and Decision 

Memorandum at ‘‘Critical 

Circumstances.’’ 

All-Others Rate 

Section 735(c)(5)(A) of the Act 

provides that the estimated ‘‘all-others’’ 

rate shall be an amount equal to the 

weighted average of the estimated 

weighted-average dumping margins 

established for exporters and producers 

individually investigated, excluding any 

zero or de minimis margins, and any 

margins determined entirely under 

section 776 of the Act. Because the final 

rate determined for the Echjay single 

entity and the Bebitz/Viraj single entity 

is based entirely on adverse facts 

available, we, therefore, based the ‘‘all 

others’’ rate on the rate calculated for 

Chandan. For a discussion of this 

methodology, see the Issues and 

Decision Memorandum. 

Final Determination Margins 

The final estimated weighted-average 

dumping margins are as follows: 

Exporter or producer 

Estimated 

weightedaverage 

dumping 

margin 

(percent) 

Cash 

deposit rate 

(adjusted for 

offset(s)) 

(percent) 

Chandan .................................................................................................................................................................. 19.16 14.29 

Echjay single entity .................................................................................................................................................. 145.25 140.38 

Bebitz/Viraj single entity .......................................................................................................................................... 145.25 145.25 

All Others ................................................................................................................................................................. 19.16 14.29 

Disclosure 

We will disclose the calculations 

performed with respect to Chandan’s 

weighted-average dumping margin to 

interested parties within five days of the 

public announcement of this final 

determination in accordance with 19 

CFR 351.224(b). With respect to the 

Echjay single entity and the Bebitz/Viraj 

single entity, because Commerce relied 

on adverse facts available to determine 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 159 / Thursday, August 16, 2018 / Notices 40747 

7See Issues and Decision Memorandum at 7–8. 

the rate for these entities and selected 

the highest petition margin as the 

adverse facts available rate, there are no 

calculations to disclose.7

Continuation of Suspension of 

Liquidation 

For entries made by Chandan, the 

Bebitz/Viraj single entity, the Echjay 

single entity, and companies covered by 

the ‘‘all others’’ rate, in accordance with 

section 735(c)(4)(B) of the Act, because 

we continue to find that critical 

circumstances exist, we will instruct 

CBP to continue to suspend liquidation 

of all appropriate entries of stainless 

steel flanges from India which were 

entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, 

for consumption on or after December 

28, 2017, which is 90 days prior to the 

date of publication of the preliminary 

determination of this investigation in 

the Federal Register. 

Commerce will instruct CBP to 

require a cash deposit equal to the 

estimated amount by which the normal 

value exceeds the U.S. price as shown 

above. Commerce normally adjusts cash 

deposits for estimated antidumping 

duties by the amount of export subsidies 

countervailed in a companion 

countervailing duty (CVD) proceeding, 

when CVD provisional measures are in 

effect. Any such adjusted cash deposit 

rate may be found in the ‘‘Final 

Determination Margins’’ section, above. 

Additionally, pursuant to section 

735(c)(1)(B)(ii) of the Act and 19 CFR 

351.210(d), Commerce will instruct CBP 

to require a cash deposit for such entries 

of merchandise equal to the estimated 

weighted-average dumping margin or 

the estimated all-others rate, as follows: 

(1) The cash deposit rate for the 

respondents listed above will be equal 

to the respondent-specific estimated 

weighted-average dumping margin 

determined in this final determination; 

(2) if the exporter is not a respondent 

identified above but the producer is, 

then the cash deposit rate will be equal 

to the respondent-specific estimated 

weighted-average dumping margin 

established for that producer of the 

subject merchandise; and (3) the cash 

deposit rate for all other producers and 

exporters will be equal to the all-others 

estimated weighted-average dumping 

margin. The suspension of liquidation 

will remain in effect until further notice. 

ITC Notification 

In accordance with section 735(d) of 

the Act, we will notify the ITC of the 

final affirmative determination of sales 

at LTFV. Because the final 

determination in this proceeding is 

affirmative, in accordance with section 

735(b)(2) of the Act, the ITC will make 

its final determination as to whether the 

domestic industry in the United States 

is materially injured, or threatened with 

material injury, no later than 45 days 

after our final determination. If the ITC 

determines that material injury or threat 

of material injury does not exist, the 

proceeding will be terminated, and all 

cash deposits will be refunded. If the 

ITC determines that such injury does 

exist, Commerce will issue an 

antidumping duty order directing CBP 

to assess, upon further instruction by 

Commerce, antidumping duties on all 

imports of the subject merchandise 

entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, 

for consumption on or after the effective 

date of the suspension of liquidation, as 

discussed above in the ‘‘Continuation of 

Suspension of Liquidation’’ section. 

Notification Regarding Administrative 

Protective Orders 

This notice serves as a reminder to 

parties subject to administrative 

protective order (APO) of their 

responsibility concerning the 

destruction of proprietary information 

disclosed under APO in accordance 

with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely 

written notification of return/ 

destruction of APO materials, or 

conversion to judicial protective order, 

is hereby requested. Failure to comply 

with the regulations and the terms of an 

APO is a violation subject to sanction. 

This determination and this notice are 

issued and published pursuant to 

sections 735(d) and 777(i)(1) of the Act. 

Notification to Interested Parties 

We are issuing and publishing this 

determination and notice in accordance 

with sections 735(d) and 777(i) of the 

Act and 19 CFR 352.210(c). 

Dated: August 10, 2018. 

James Maeder, 

Associate Deputy Assistant Secretary for 

Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 

Operations performing the duties of Deputy 

Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Operations. 

Appendix I 

Scope of the Investigation 

The products covered by this investigation 

are certain forged stainless-steel flanges, 

whether unfinished, semi-finished, or 

finished (certain forged stainless-steel 

flanges). Certain forged stainless steel flanges 

are generally manufactured to, but not 

limited to, the material specification of 

ASTM/ASME A/SA182 or comparable 

domestic or foreign specifications. Certain 

forged stainless steel flanges are made in 

various grades such as, but not limited to, 

304, 304L, 316, and 316L (or combinations 

thereof). The term ‘‘stainless steel’’ used in 

this scope refers to an alloy steel containing, 

by actual weight, 1.2 percent or less of carbon 

and 10.5 percent or more of chromium, with 

or without other elements. 

Unfinished stainless-steel flanges possess 

the approximate shape of finished stainless 

steel flanges and have not yet been machined 

to final specification after the initial forging 

or like operations. These machining 

processes may include, but are not limited to, 

boring, facing, spot facing, drilling, tapering, 

threading, beveling, heating, or compressing. 

Semi-finished stainless steel flanges are 

unfinished stainless-steel flanges that have 

undergone some machining processes. 

The scope includes six general types of 

flanges. They are: (1) Weld neck, generally 

used in butt-weld line connection; (2) 

threaded, generally used for threaded line 

connections; (3) slip-on, generally used to 

slide over pipe; (4) lap joint, generally used 

with stub-ends/butt-weld line connections; 

(5) socket weld, generally used to fit pipe 

into a machine recession; and (6) blind, 

generally used to seal off a line. The sizes 

and descriptions of the flanges within the 

scope include all pressure classes of ASME 

B16.5 and range from one-half inch to 

twenty-four inches nominal pipe size. 

Specifically excluded from the scope of this 

investigation are cast stainless steel flanges. 

Cast stainless steel flanges generally are 

manufactured to specification ASTM A351. 

The country of origin for certain forged 

stainless-steel flanges, whether unfinished, 

semi finished, or finished is the country 

where the flange was forged. Subject 

merchandise includes stainless steel flanges 

as defined above that have been further 

processed in a third country. The processing 

includes, but is not limited to, boring, facing, 

spot facing, drilling, tapering, threading, 

beveling, heating, or compressing, and/or any 

other processing that would not otherwise 

remove the merchandise from the scope of 

the investigation if performed in the country 

of manufacture of the stainless-steel flanges. 

Merchandise subject to this investigation is 

typically imported under headings 

7307.21.1000 and 7307.21.5000 of the 

Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United 

States (HTSUS). While HTSUS subheadings 

and ASTM specifications are provided for 

convenience and customs purposes, the 

written description of the scope is 

dispositive. 

Appendix II 

List of Topics Discussed in the Issues and 

Decision Memorandum 

I. Summary 

II. Background 

III. Scope of the Investigation 

IV. Final Determination of Critical 

Circumstances 

V. Affiliation and Collapsing 

VI. Changes Since the Preliminary 

Determination 

VII. Use of Adverse Facts Available 

VIII. Discussion of the Issues 

Comment 1: Application of Total AFA for 

Bebitz/Viraj single entity 

Comment 2: Collapsing of Echjay and its 

Affiliates, and Application of Total AFA 

to the Echjay Single Entity 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES
40748 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 159 / Thursday, August 16, 2018 / Notices 

1See Multilayered Wood Flooring from the 

People’s Republic of China: Initiation of 

Antidumping Duty New Shipper Reviews; 2014– 

2015, 80 FR 45192 (July 29, 2015). 

2See Multilayered Wood Flooring from the 

People’s Republic of China: Rescission of 

Antidumping Duty New Shipper Reviews; 2015– 

2015, 81 FR 74393 (October 26, 2016) (Final 

Rescission). 

3See Huzhou Muyun Wood Co. Ltd. v. United 

States, 41 CIT __, 279 F. Supp. 3d 1215 (CIT 2017). 

4See Huzhou Muyun Wood Co., Ltd. v. United 

States, 2018 WL 3455350 (CIT July 16, 2018). 

5 Id. at *8 (referring to the factors outlined at 

section 751(a)(2)(B)(iv) of the Act). 

6See MLWF Amended Final Determination, 79 FR 

21509 (May 2, 2014) (MLWF Amended Final 

Determination). 

Comment 3: Product Characteristics used 

in the CONNUM Methodology 

Comment 4: Application of Partial AFA for 

Packing Costs 

Comment 5: Home Market Sales Viability 

Comment 6: Credit Expenses 

Comment 7: Clarification of the Scope of 

the Order 

Comment 8: Import Duties 

Comment 9: G&A Expense Ratio 

Calculation 

Comment 10: Antidumping Duty Cash 

Deposit Rate offset by the Countervailing 

Duty Export Subsidy Rate 

IX. Conclusion 

[FR Doc. 2018–17688 Filed 8–15–18; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–570–970] 

Multilayered Wood Flooring From the 

People’s Republic of China: Notice of 

Court Decision Not in Harmony With 

Final Rescission of the Antidumping 

Duty New Shipper Review 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: On July 16, 2018, the United 

States Court of International Trade (CIT) 

issued a final judgment in Huzhou 

Muyun Wood Co., Ltd., LLC. v. United 

States ordering the Department of 

Commerce (Commerce) to proceed with 

Huzhou Muyun Wood Co., Ltd.’s 

(Muyun Wood) new shipper review of 

the antidumping duty order on 

multilayered wood flooring (wood 

flooring) from the People’s Republic of 

China (China). Commerce is notifying 

the public that the final judgment in this 

case is not in harmony with the final 

rescission of the new shipper review. 

DATES: Applicable beginning July 26, 

2018. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Aleksandras Nakutis, Office IV, 

Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 

Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, 

DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–3147. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

Muyun Wood is a Chinese producer/ 

exporter of wood flooring. On June 13, 

2015, Huzhou Muyun Wood Co., Ltd.’s 

(Muyun Wood) requested a new shipper 

review. On July 29, 2015, Commerce 

initiated the requested new shipper 

review covering the period of December 

1, 2014, through May 31, 2015.1

On October 26, 2016, Commerce 

issued the Final Rescission.2 In the 

Final Rescission, Commerce determined 

that Muyun’s single sale was not bona 

fide and, accordingly, rescinded its new 

shipper review. Muyun Wood 

challenged Commerce’s findings in the 

Final Rescission at the CIT. 

On December 11, 2017, the CIT 

remanded for Commerce to determine 

whether Muyun Wood’s sale during the 

review period was bona fide.3 In 

accordance with the Court’s decision, 

Commerce reconsidered its previous 

analysis and continued to determine 

that Muyun Wood’s single sale was nonbona fide. Specifically, Commerce 

considered the following factors 

weighed against finding Muyun’s sale 

bona fide: (1) The price reported by 

Muyun Wood was significantly higher 

than the highest comparison sales price 

for identical merchandise reported 

during a contemporaneous period; (2) 

the evidence indicating that Muyun 

Wood’s unaffiliated and new customer 

did not resell the entirety of the 

merchandise at question for a profit; and 

(3) the singular nature of the sale. 

On July 16, 2018, the CIT held that 

Commerce’s ultimate conclusion that 

the sale was not bona fide was not 

supported by substantial evidence and 

that the rescission of the new shipper 

review cannot be upheld.4 The CIT 

found that the totality of the 

circumstances do not support a finding 

that the sale was not bona fide, given 

that the sales quantity was typical, the 

expenses incurred were normal, the sale 

was made at arm’s length, the payment 

timing was not atypical, and a 

substantial majority of the product was 

resold for a profit.5 The CIT entered 

judgment, ordering Commerce to 

proceed with Muyun Wood’s new 

shipper review. 

Timken Notice 

In its decision in Timken, as clarified 

by Diamond Sawblades, the CAFC held 

that, pursuant to section 516A(e) of the 

Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act), 

Commerce must publish a notice of a 

court decision that is not ‘‘in harmony’’ 

with Commerce’s determination and 

must suspend liquidation of entries 

pending a ‘‘conclusive’’ court decision. 

The CIT’s July 16, 2018 final judgment, 

ordering Commerce to proceed with 

Muyun Wood’s new shipper review, 

constitutes a final decision of that court 

that is not in harmony with the Final 

Rescission.6 This notice is published in 

fulfillment of the publication 

requirements of Timken. 

This notice is issued and published in 

accordance with sections 516A(e)(1), 

751(a)(1), and 777(i)(1) of the Act. 

Dated: August 9, 2018. 

James Maeder, 

Associate Deputy Assistant Secretary for 

Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 

Operations performing the duties of Deputy 

Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Operations. 

[FR Doc. 2018–17562 Filed 8–15–18; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[C–533–878] 

Stainless Steel Flanges From India: 

Final Affirmative Countervailing Duty 

Determination and Final Affirmative 

Determination of Critical 

Circumstances 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce 

(Commerce) determines that 

countervailable subsidies are being 

provided to producers and exporters of 

stainless steel flanges from India during 

the period of investigation January 1, 

2016, through December 31, 2016. 

DATES: Applicable August 16, 2018. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Ryan Mullen or Chelsey Simonovich, 

AD/CVD Operations, Office V, 

Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 

Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, 

DC 20230; telephone (202) 482–5260 or 

(202) 482–1979, respectively. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On January 23, 2018, Commerce 

published the Preliminary 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES