alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER



Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted), Anthony J. Bettencourt, Chief
Executive Officer of Verity, Inc. (the Company), and Steven R. Springsteel, the Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certify that, to the best of their knowledge:



1. The Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended
November 30, 2003, and to which this Certification is attached as Exhibit 32, (the Periodic Report) fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2. The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have set their hands hereto as of the 9th day of January, 2004.



|/s/ ANTHONY J. BETTENCOURT           
|-------------------------------------
|Anthony J. Bettencourt               
|Chief Executive Officer and President



|/s/ STEVEN R. SPRINGSTEEL                                                      
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Steven R. Springsteel                                                          
|Senior Vice President of Finance and Administration and Chief Financial Officer
# C_2014049EN.01000201.xml

| 21.2.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 49/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.2.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 49/2

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

20 February 2014

(2014/C 49/03)

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,3706 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 139,91 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4625 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,82200 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 8,9606 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,2203 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,3625 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 27,382 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 313,58 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,1801 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,5246 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 3,0292 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,5269 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,5189 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 10,6298 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,6555 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,7352 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 474,49 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 15,1857 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 8,3394 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,6693 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 16 178,08 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,5360 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 61,379 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 49,1162 |
| THB | Thai baht | 44,680 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 3,2738 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 18,2701 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 85,4780 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,3706

JPY

Japanese yen

139,91

DKK

Danish krone

7,4625

GBP

Pound sterling

0,82200

SEK

Swedish krona

8,9606

CHF

Swiss franc

1,2203

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,3625

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

27,382

HUF

Hungarian forint

313,58

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

PLN

Polish zloty

4,1801

RON

Romanian leu

4,5246

TRY

Turkish lira

3,0292

AUD

Australian dollar

1,5269

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,5189

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

10,6298

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,6555

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,7352

KRW

South Korean won

1 474,49

ZAR

South African rand

15,1857

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

8,3394

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,6693

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

16 178,08

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,5360

PHP

Philippine peso

61,379

RUB

Russian rouble

49,1162

THB

Thai baht

44,680

BRL

Brazilian real

3,2738

MXN

Mexican peso

18,2701

INR

Indian rupee

85,4780

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
EXHIBIT 23.0



                   INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT



The Board of Directors and Stockholders
CPI Corp.:


We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration
statements Nos. 33-50082 and 002-86403 on Forms S-8 of CPI Corp. of our
report dated April 4, 2002, except for paragraph 3 of note 4, which is
as of April 12, 2002, relating to the consolidated balance sheets of CPI
Corp. and subsidiaries as of February 2, 2002 and February 3, 2001 and the
related consolidated statements of earnings, changes in stockholders'
equity and cash flows for each of the fiscal years in the three-year period
ended February 2, 2002, and the related schedule, which report appears in
the 2001 annual report on Form 10-K of CPI Corp.






/s/ KPMG LLP
-------------------------
    KPMG LLP



St. Louis, Missouri
May 1, 2002
#### John C. MOSLEY, Jr., Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. O-270.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Sept. 21, 1971.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

October 31, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice 131400 & (67)(72) Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, Justices

v SC: 131400 COA: 258574 Oakland CC: 04-196584-FH JAMES GARY RENAUD, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the motion for immediate consideration is GRANTED. The application for leave to ap peal the April 18, 2 006 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be review ed by this Court. The motion to remand is DENIED.

p1023 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

October 31, 2006

Clerk
Electronically Filed

Intermediate Court of Appeals

CAAP-13-0001305

05-DEC-2014

10:01 AM
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-6756

PRESTON D. JOHNSON,

Petitioner - Appellant,

v.

MICHAEL MCCALL; HENRY D. MCMASTER,

Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

South Carolina, at Florence. Cameron McGowan Currie, District 

Judge. (4:08-cv-03840-CMC)

Submitted: February 28, 2011 Decided: March 7, 2011

Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, and KING and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Preston D. Johnson, Appellant Pro Se. William Edgar Salter, 

III, Assistant Attorney General, Donald John Zelenka, Deputy 

Assistant Attorney General, Columbia, South Carolina, for 

Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Preston D. Johnson seeks to appeal the district 

court’s orders accepting the recommendation of the magistrate 

judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2006)

petition, and denying reconsideration of that order. The orders

are not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a 

certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2006). A 

certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a 

substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 

28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006). When the district court denies 

relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by 

demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the 

district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is 

debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 

(2000); see Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003). 

When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the 

prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural 

ruling is debatable, and that the petition states a debatable 

claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack, 529 U.S. 

at 484-85. We have independently reviewed the record and 

conclude that Preston has not made the requisite showing. 

Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss 

the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts 

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials 
3

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional 

process.

DISMISSED
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 3195

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to increase the income threshold

amounts at which 85 percent of social security benefits become includible

in gross income.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

SEPTEMBER 30, 1993

Mr. FILNER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Ways and Means

A BILL

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to increase

the income threshold amounts at which 85 percent of

social security benefits become includible in gross income.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Middle Income Senior

5 Tax Relief Act of 1993’’.

6 SEC. 2. INCREASE IN INCOME THRESHOLD AMOUNTS.

7 (a) GENERAL RULE.—Paragraph (2) of section 86(c)

8 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (as amended by the

9 Revenue Reconciliation Act of 1993) is amended—
2

•HR 3195 IH

1 (1) by striking ‘‘$34,000’’ and inserting

2 ‘‘$37,000’’, and

3 (2) by striking ‘‘$44,000’’ and inserting

4 ‘‘$54,000’’.

5 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by

6 subsection (a) shall apply to taxable years beginning after

7 December 31, 1993.

Æ
Page 1 of 3

Disposition Comments

Docket No: FAA-2014-0007 These comments are in

Directorate ID: 2012-NM-038-AD response to an SNPRM

Originating Office Tracking No.: 2012-0023

Next Step: FRAN SNPRM

 No Comments/Only Supportive Comments Received – If this box is checked, no signatures are 

required.

No Has the referenced service information been revised since the NPRM was issued? If yes,

list latest revision and attach a copy. Note that changes beyond the scope of the previously 

published NPRM will require a new notice. Contact the Directorate focal point for guidance.

Instructions: Summarize all comments by issue (not by commenter) and provide your recommended resolution of 

each issue. All comments relating to the same issue should be discussed together. Do not list all of the issues 

from one commenter together. If changes to the AD are required based on the comments received, explain why and 

describe in detail what change(s) you recommend. Reference FAA-IR-M-8040.1C Chapter 9.

ISSUE 1: Select one of the following: 

If other, explain: 

Commenter(s): 

What change to the AD action is requested? 

Why is the change requested or how is it justified? 

Do we agree? 

If YES, we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: 

If PARTIALLY AGREE, we agree with because We disagree with because 

Make the following changes to the AD: 

If NO, we don’t agree because 

ISSUE 2: Select one of the following: 

If other, explain: 

Commenter(s): 

What change to the AD action is requested? 

Why is the change requested or how is it justified? 

Do we agree? 

If YES, we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: 

If PARTIALLY AGREE, we agree with because We disagree with because 

Make the following changes to the AD:
Page 2 of 3

If NO, we don’t agree because 

For additional issues, double-click here
Page 3 of 3

Signature Section

Signature indicates concurrence with this action.

Originating Office Tracking No.: 

ASE Printed Name: Date

Branch Manager Date
Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm



The Board of Directors
Dataram Corporation:

We consent to incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement
(No. 33-56282) on Form S-8 of Dataram Corporation and subsidiaries of
our reports dated July 8, 2005, relating to the consolidated statements
of earnings, stockholders' equity and cash flows of Dataram Corporation
and subsidiaries for the year ended April 30, 2005, and the related
financial statement schedule for the year ended April 30, 2005 which
reports appear in the April 30, 2007 annual report on Form 10-K of
Dataram Corporation.


/s/ KPMG LLP
Short Hills, New Jersey
July 25, 2007
# C_2013033EN.01000401.xml

| 5.2.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 33/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.2.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 33/4

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

4 February 2013

2013/C 33/04

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,3552 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 125,63 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4599 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,86190 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 8,5823 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,2350 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 7,4275 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 25,669 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 293,23 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,7003 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,1640 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,3720 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,3790 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,2990 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,3509 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 10,5081 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,6002 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,6781 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 478,02 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 12,1188 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 8,4482 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,5915 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 13 112,82 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,2080 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 55,000 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 40,6490 |
| THB | Thai baht | 40,344 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 2,6975 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 17,1751 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 72,1980 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,3552

JPY

Japanese yen

125,63

DKK

Danish krone

7,4599

GBP

Pound sterling

0,86190

SEK

Swedish krona

8,5823

CHF

Swiss franc

1,2350

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

7,4275

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

25,669

HUF

Hungarian forint

293,23

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,7003

PLN

Polish zloty

4,1640

RON

Romanian leu

4,3720

TRY

Turkish lira

2,3790

AUD

Australian dollar

1,2990

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,3509

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

10,5081

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,6002

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,6781

KRW

South Korean won

1 478,02

ZAR

South African rand

12,1188

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

8,4482

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,5915

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

13 112,82

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,2080

PHP

Philippine peso

55,000

RUB

Russian rouble

40,6490

THB

Thai baht

40,344

BRL

Brazilian real

2,6975

MXN

Mexican peso

17,1751

INR

Indian rupee

72,1980

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
EXHIBIT 10.15


                                                 June 1, 2002
Mr. Harvey Alstodt
c/o Del Laboratories, Inc.
178 EAB Plaza, 8th floor
Uniondale, NY 11556

Re:  Amendment to Employment Agreement

Dear Harvey:

     Reference is made to the employment agreement , dated April 1, 2001 (as
amended, the "AGREEMENT"), between you and Del Laboratories, Inc. ("DEL").
              ---------                                            -----

     Del and you hereby agree to amend the Agreement as follows:

In the first sentence of Section 2 ("Salary"), the phrase "Three Hundred Twenty
Thousand Dollars ($320,000)" shall be deleted and replaced by the phrase "Three
Hundred Fifty Thousand Dollars ($350,000).

     As amended hereby, the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect.

                                             Sincerely,
                                             DEL LABORATORIES, INC.


                                             By: /s/ Dan K. Wassong
                                                     Dan K. Wassong
                                                     President

      ACCEPTED AND AGREED TO:

      /s/ Harvey Alstodt
      Harvey Alstodt


                                       1
<PAGE>
23 17 27 36

54

68

64

66

62

45

9 19

8 3 1

0%

25%

50%

75%

100%

Under 30

years

30-44

years

45-64

years

65-74

years

75 years

and older

Figure 2. Distribution of household 

size by age of householder: 2012

5 or more

persons

2-4 persons

1 person

Source: U.S. Census Bureau, Current Population Survey, 2012 

Annual Social and Economic Supplements.
Exhibit 31.1



                  CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                         THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


I, Anthony J. Merante, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Brooklyn Cheesecake &
Desserts Company, Inc;

2. Based on my  knowledge,  this  quarterly  report  does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact  necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the  circumstances  under which such statements
were made,  not  misleading  with  respect to the period  covered by this annual
report;

3.  Based  on my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and  other  financial
information  included in this quarterly report,  fairly presents in all material
respects the financial  condition,  results of operations  and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4. I am responsible for  establishing  and maintaining  disclosure  controls and
procedures  (as  defined  in  Exchange  Act Rules  13a-14  and  15d-14)  for the
registrant and I have:
      a)  designed  such  disclosure  controls  and  procedures  to ensure  that
material  information  relating to the  registrant,  including its  consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to me by others within those entities,  particularly
during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

      b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures  as of a date  within 90 days prior to the  filing of this  quarterly
report (the "Evaluation Date"); and


      c)  presented  in  this  quarterly   report  our  conclusions   about  the
effectiveness of the disclosure  controls and procedures based on our evaluation
as of the Evaluation Date;


5. I have disclosed,  based on our most recent  evaluation,  to the registrant's
auditors and the audit  committee  of the  registrant's  board of directors  (or
persons performing the equivalent function):


      a) all  significant  deficiencies  in the design or  operation of internal
controls  which  could  adversely  affect  the  registrant's  ability to record,
process,  summarize  and  report  financial  data  and have  identified  for the
registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and


      b) any fraud,  whether or not material,  that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and


6. I have  indicated  in  this  quarterly  report  whether  or  not  there  were
significant  changes  in  internal  controls  or in  other  factors  that  could
significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent
evaluation,   including  any  corrective  actions  with  regard  to  significant
deficiencies and material weaknesses.



Date: May 26, 2006


/s/ Anthony J. Merante


-----------------------------------------------------------------
Anthony J. Merante
President, Chief Executive Officer, and Chief Financial Officer
#### Clifford DAKER, Relator, v. Honorable James M. REASBECK, as Judge of the Court of Record, in and for Broward County, Florida, Respondent.

No. 71-99.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Feb. 17, 1971.

Prohibition denied.
# C_2014234EN.01000601.xml

| 19.7.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 234/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.7.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 234/6

---

Information communicated by Member States regarding closure of fisheries

2014/C 234/07

In accordance with Article 35(3) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1224/2009 of 20 November 2009 establishing a Community control system for ensuring compliance with the rules of the common fisheries policy (1), a decision has been taken to close the fishery as set down in the following table:

1

| Date and time of closure | 26.6.2014 |
| --- | --- |
| Duration | 26.6.2014 - 31.12.2014 |
| Member State | The Netherlands |
| Stock or Group of stocks | COD/03AN. |
| Species | Cod (Gadus Morhua) |
| Zone | Skagerrak |
| Type(s) of fishing vessels | — |
| Reference number | 13/TQ43 |

Date and time of closure

26.6.2014

Duration

26.6.2014 - 31.12.2014

Member State

The Netherlands

Stock or Group of stocks

COD/03AN.

Species

Cod (Gadus Morhua)

(Gadus Morhua)

Zone

Skagerrak

Type(s) of fishing vessels

—

Reference number

13/TQ43

---

(1)  OJ L 343, 22.12.2009, p. 1.

1

---
#### A. B. PETERSON, Jr., Appellant, v. Stanley C. WASMAN and Mildred Wasman, his wife, Appellees.

No. I-65.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. First District.

Jan. 26, 1967.

Rehearing Denied Feb. 22, 1967.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
#### The STATE of Florida ex rel. Thomas FRANKLIN, Jr., a minor, and Thomas Franklin, Sr., his Father, Relators, v. The Honorable Murray GOODMAN, Judge of the Criminal Court of Record in and for Dade County, Florida, Respondent.

No. 71-1039.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Sept. 28, 1971.

PER CURIAM.

Prohibition dismissed.
<PAGE>



EXHIBIT 3.2

                            CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT
                                       OF
                              AMENDED AND RESTATED
                          CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION
                                       OF
                          TRANSKARYOTIC THERAPIES, INC.

                             Pursuant to Section 242
                        of the General Corporation Law of
                             the State of Delaware

         Transkaryotic Therapies, Inc. (hereinafter called the "Corporation"),
organized and existing under and by virtue of the General Corporation Law of the
State of Delaware, does hereby certify as follows:

         At a meeting of the Board of Directors of the Corporation a resolution
was duly adopted, pursuant to Section 242 of the General Corporation Law of the
State of Delaware, setting forth an amendment to the Certificate of
Incorporation of the Corporation and declaring said amendment to be advisable.
The stockholders of the Corporation duly approved said proposed amendment at a
meeting in accordance with Section 242 of the General Corporation Law of the
State of Delaware. The resolution setting forth the amendment is as follows:

RESOLVED:          That the first paragraph of Article FOURTH of the Certificate
                   of Incorporation of the Corporation be and hereby is deleted
                   in its entirety and the following paragraph is inserted in
                   lieu thereof:

                   FOURTH: The total number of all classes of stock which the
                   Corporation shall have authority to issue is 110,000,000
                   shares, consisting of (i) 100,000,000 shares of Common Stock,
                   $.01 par value per share ("Common Stock"), and (ii)
                   10,000,000 shares of Preferred Stock, $.01 par value per
                   share ("Preferred Stock").

<PAGE>

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Corporation has caused this Certificate of
Amendment to be signed by its President this 15th day of June, 2000.

                                       Transkaryotic Therapies, Inc.



                                        By: /s/ RICHARD F SELDEN
                                           ------------------------------------
                                        Richard F Selden, M.D., Ph.D., President









                                       2