alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.2
 Certification of Chief Financial Officer
Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of SP Bancorp, Inc.;
 2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;
 3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the consolidated financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented
in this report;
 4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is
made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared;
 b)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this
report based on such evaluation; and
 c)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control
over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal
quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect,
the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and
 5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of the registrants board of directors:
 a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely
affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; and
 b)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting.
 Date: May 16, 2011

/s/
Suzanne C. SallsSuzanne C. SallsSenior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
##### 



Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Vodavi Technology,
Inc., (the Company) for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2003 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, Gregory K. Roeper, President and Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C.
78m(a) or 78o(d)); and  
| | --- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
| | (2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.

| |  |                                                                         
| |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |  | /s/ Gregory K. Roeper                                                   
| |  |                                                                         
| |  | Gregory K. Roeper
President and Chief Executive Officer
October 28, 2003

22
#### CONFEDERATION LIFE ASSOCIATION, a Canadian corporation, also known as La Confederacion Del Canada, Petitioner, v. Manuel Antonio VEGA y ARMINAN, Respondent.

No. 37195.

Supreme Court of Florida.

May 29, 1968.

Rehearing Denied July 1, 1968.

Shutts & Bowen, Cotton Howell, Miami, Covington & Burling, John G. Laylin, William A. Dobrovir, and George V. Allen, Jr., Washington, D. C., for petitioner.

Helliwell, Melrose & DeWolf, Thomas B. DeWolf and Michael G. Martin, Miami, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The District Court of Appeal, Third District, having certified to us that its decision in the case of Confederation Life Association v. Vega y Arminan, 207 So.2d 33, passes upon a question of great public interest, we have jurisdiction of the petition for certiorari herein pursuant to Section 4(2), Article V, State Constitution, F.S.A.

Our study of the case leads us to the conclusion that the decision of the District Court is correct and we adopt it as our answer to the certified question.

The writ of certiorari is discharged.

ROBERTS, ERVIN and ADAMS, JJ., and SPECTOR, District Court Judge, concur.

CALDWELL, C. J., dissents.
#### Donald J. KING, Appellant, v. KLOSTER REDERI A/S, d/b/a Norwegian Carribbean Lines, Appellee.

No. 73-716.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Nov. 13, 1973.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
# C_2013378EN.01001901.xml

| 24.12.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 378/19 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.12.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 378/19

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.7100 — New Mountain Capital/Alexander Mann Solutions)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2013/C 378/08

On 13 December 2013, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32013M7100. EUR-Lex is the online access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32013M7100. EUR-Lex is the online access to the European law.

---
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 23.2

                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS


We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in this Registration
Statement on Form S-4 of WCB Holding Corp. of our reports dated February 17,
2000 relating to the financial statements and financial statement schedules,
which appear in Entergy Corporation's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year
ended December 31, 1999. We also consent to the reference to us under the
heading "Experts" in such Registration Statement.

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

New Orleans, Louisiana
August 21, 2000
U.S. flag
              An official website of the United States government Skip to main content   end of header Census.gov Newsroom Releases Miscellaneous
 Newsroom Archive
 Skip left menu navigation
 About the Newsroom
 				Facts for Features
 				**News Releases**
 				Press Kits
 				Tip Sheets
 Release Information CB12-162 **Contact:**  Public Information Office
301-763-3030
 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:  WEDNESDAY, AUG. 29, 2012 Media Advisory — RSVP Today: Census Bureau to Host Webinar on Filing Export Information Electronically — The ABCs of AES What:
 The U.S. Census Bureau is the official source for U.S. export and import statistics and is responsible for issuing regulations governing the reporting of all export shipments from the United States. This fifth webinar in the eight-part series will familiarize you with the Automated Export System (AES), including how to report your export shipments to the AES, how to avoid common problems and how to respond to error messages. See complete series at: <https://www.census.gov/newsroom/releases/archives/news_conferences/webinars_exporting.html>. Please dial in by phone to listen to a simultaneous audio conference while viewing the online presentation. A question-and-answer session will follow the presentation. Please log in early, as some setup is required.
 When:
 Wednesday, Sept. 5, 1 p.m. (EDT)
 Who:
 Nidaal Jubran, client representative, Automated Export Systems Branch, Foreign Trade Division, U.S. Census Bureau
 RSVP today:
 Sign up for webinar at: https://www.mymeetings.com/emeet/rsvp/index.jsp?customHeader=mymeetings &Conference_ID=9987477&passcode=9368993


If closed captioning is required: http://livewrite.nccsite.com/view/cb0905

To register for this event:
1. Go to the URL listed above.
2. Provide your information for the event leader and then click submit.
3. Registration closes one hour prior to event.
  Follow @uscensusbureau on Twitter, Facebook, Flickr, YouTube and Ustream.
  CONNECT WITH US

Information Quality
                    Data Linkage Infrastructure
                    Data Protection and Privacy Policy
                    Accessibility      
                    FOIA
                    Inspector General
                    No FEAR Act
                    U.S. Department of Commerce
                    USA.gov
                   Measuring America's People, Places, and Economy
**Final Listing of Questionnaire Files for Steam Electric Rulemaking Record**

**Plant ID 06627**  **Removed from Public**  **(Non-CBI) Docket**  **1 Copyright** 

**Flag 2**  **File Name Description**  x 

### 06627\06627_Checklist_110810_version34.xls EPA Technical Review Checklist Workbook



### 06627\06627_Completeness_Checklist.xls EPA Completeness Review Checklist 

### 06627\06627_HardcopyLog.doc EPA log of hardcopy documents submitted x 

### 06627\06627_Part A.xls Plant submitted survey file x 

### 06627\06627_Part E.xls Plant submitted survey file x 

### 06627\06627_Part H.xls Plant submitted survey file



### 06627\Certification Statement Plant ID 06627.pdf Plant certification statement x 

### 06627\Supplemental Documents\06627_A5-3 WB Diagram.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

06627\Supplemental Documents\06627_AEP ELGs ICR submittal letter 9-13-10.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey 06627\Supplemental Documents\06627_AEP LBM A5-2 Aerial Map.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

1Final reviewed survey responses are located in the Steam Electric Technical Questionnaire Database
. 2Copyright documents are available from the docket.
nav.qf-topnav div.qf-icon[data-view="map"],
  nav.qf-topnav div.qf-icon[data-view="chart"] {
  visibility: hidden !important;
  display: none !important;
}
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.2

                              STATEMENT PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                                 AS REQUIRED BY
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of John Deere Capital Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the period ending October 31, 2002, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the
undersigned hereby certify that to the best of our knowledge:

1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

December 20, 2002  /s/ R. W. Lane       Chairman and Principal Executive Officer
-----------------  -----------------

December 20, 2002  /s/ N. J. Jones      Senior Vice President and
-----------------  -----------------    Principal Financial Officer
#### William Lamar ROSE, Appellant, v. D. Vernon SMITH, Appellee.

No. 6874.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Second District.

Feb. 3, 1967.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
**REGULATORY EVALUATION**

**Directorate Identifier:** 201 2

- NM

- 039

- AD

**Executive Order 12866:** Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action”? YES ( ) explain NO (X) **DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:** Is the AD significant? YES ( ) explain NO (X) **Regulatory Flexibility Act:** Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? YES ( ) explain NO (X) **Intrastate Aviation in Alaska:** This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. I s it appropriate t o include specific requirements for aircraft operated in Alaska, where aviation might be the only mode of transportation? YES ( ) explain NO (X)
#### Succession of Mrs. Ida BROWN, Wife of Henry SCIE, and the Said Henry Scie.

No. 4367.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Fourth Circuit.

Nov. 2, 1970.

William Barnett, New Orleans, for ad-ministratrix, Mrs. Pearl Scie Eskind.

John Dolan, John Coman, Jr., New Orleans, for Mrs. Doretha Evans, Mrs. Lillian Profit and Henry Scie.

Before SAMUEL, CHASEZ, and LE-SUEUR, JJ.

CHASEZ, Judge.

Mrs. Pearl Scie Eskind, as administratrix of the estate of her parents Mrs. Ida Brown, wife of and Henry Scie, filed a petition in the lower court to sell real estate of the succession at private sale. The real estate sought to be sold was the family *584home, which bears the municipal number of 471 Brooklyn Avenue, and which is located in Jefferson Parish.

Three of the eleven heirs filed an opposition to the application to sell the property.

The administratrix filed a rule to show cause why the application to sell the property at private sale should not he granted and the opposition should not be dismissed. The rule was heard on April 6, 1970 and after witnesses testified and evidence was produced, the rule was made absolute and the opposition to the application of the administratrix was dismissed.

The appellants failed to perfect a timely suspensive appeal but were granted a de-volutive appeal on May 15, 1970.

On May 22, 1970 pursuant to an order of the District Court and in accordance with an Agreement of Sale between the administratrix and a third-party purchaser, the property was sold at private sale. The administratrix subsequently filed this motion to dismiss the appeal on the ground that it has become moot. We concur and the appeal will accordingly be dismissed.

A devolutive appeal does not suspend the effect or the execution of an appealable order or judgment, LSA-C.C.P. art. 2087. See also Fayard v. Celestan, La.App. 227 So.2d 795 (4th Cir. 1969); and Hibernia National Bank in New Orleans v. Mary, La.App. 174 So.2d 200 (4th Cir. 1965). These cases dealt with devolutive appeals from foreclosure proceedings where the property had been sold subsequent to the appeal. However, there is no significant difference in the theory to be applied.

Since the sale has already taken place, there is no order or judgment this court could render which would grant appellants the relief which they seek or undo that which has already been done.

For the foregoing reasons, the motion to dismiss is sustained and the appeal is dismissed.

Motion to dismiss sustained, appeal dismissed.
No. 00-7329.

#### Sedgwick *v.*Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation et al.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 23.3

INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

We consent to the use in this Registration Statement of iTurf Inc. on Form
S-4 of our report dated March 30, 1999 (April 14, 1999 as to Note 1 sentences
two and three), appearing in the Prospectus, which is part of this
Registration Statement.

We also consent to the reference to us under the heading "Experts" in such
Prospectus.

/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

New York, New York
August 28, 2000
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned,
certifies that to the best of his knowledge (1) this Quarterly Report of Corporate Capital Trust, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
the date hereof (this Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and (2) the information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition of the Company as of September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010.



|                       |  |  |  |     |  |                              
|---------------------- |  |  |  | --- |  | -----------------------------
|Date: November 9, 2011 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/ Paul S. Saint-Pierre     
|                       |  |  |  |     |  | PAUL S. SAINT-PIERRE         
|                       |  |  |  |     |  | Chief Financial Officer      
|                       |  |  |  |     |  | (Principal Financial Officer)
# C_2013237EN.01000101.xml

| 15.8.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 237/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.8.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 237/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.6843 — Siemens/Invensys Rail)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2013/C 237/01

On 18 April 2013, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32013M6843. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32013M6843. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.

---
M A N D A T E

THE STATE OF TEXAS

TO THE 131ST JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF BEXAR COUNTY, GREETINGS:

Before our Court of Appeals for the Fourth District of Texas on April 29, 2015, the cause upon appeal to revise

or reverse your judgment between

In the Interest of B.C., P.C., Jr., and A.C., Appellant

V.

No. 04-14-00744-CV and Tr. Ct. No. 2013-PA-01143

was determined, and therein our said Court of Appeals made its order in these words:

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the trial court’s

judgment is AFFIRMED.

It is ORDERED that no costs shall be assessed against Mother, Raquel P.,

or Father, Paul C, in relation to this appeal because they each qualify as

indigent under TEX. R. APP. P. 20.

WHEREFORE, WE COMMAND YOU to observe the order of our said Court of Appeals for the Fourth

District of Texas, in this behalf and in all things have the order duly recognized, obeyed, and executed.

WITNESS the Hon. Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice of the Court of Appeals for the Fourth District of

Texas, with the seal of the Court affixed and the City of San Antonio on July 8, 2015.

KEITH E. HOTTLE, CLERK

Cynthia A. Martinez

Deputy Clerk, Ext. 53853
BILL OF COSTS

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, FOURTH DISTRICT, AT SAN ANTONIO

No. 04-14-00744-CV

In the Interest of B.C., P.C., Jr., and A.C.

v.

(NO. 2013-PA-01143 IN 131ST JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF BEXAR COUNTY)

TYPE OF FEE CHARGES PAID BY

Balance of costs owing to the Fourth Court of Appeals, San Antonio, Texas: 0.00

Court costs in this cause shall be paid as per the Judgment issued by this Court.

I, KEITH E. HOTTLE, CLERK OF THE FOURTH COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF

TEXAS, do hereby certify that the above and foregoing is a true and correct copy of the cost bill of

THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS, showing the charges and

payments, in the above numbered and styled cause, as the same appears of record in this office.

IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, witness my hand and the Seal of the COURT OF APPEALS for

the Fourth District of Texas, this July 8, 2015.

KEITH E. HOTTLE, CLERK

Cynthia A. Martinez

Deputy Clerk, Ext. 53853
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 3243

To suspend temporarily the duties on sumatriptan succinate (bulk and dosage

forms).

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

OCTOBER 7, 1993

Mr. PRICE of North Carolina (for himself, Mr. HOAGLAND, Mr. LANCASTER,

and Mr. VALENTINE) introduced the following bill; which was referred to

the Committee on Ways and Means

A BILL

To suspend temporarily the duties on sumatriptan succinate

(bulk and dosage forms).

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SUMATRIPTAN SUCCINATE (BULK AND DOSAGE

4 FORMS).

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of

6 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is

7 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following

8 new headings:
2

•HR 3243 IH

‘‘ 9902.31.12 3-[2-(dimethylamino)ethyl]-Nmethyl-1H-indole-5-

methanesulphonamide (1:1)

succinate (sumatriptan succinate-bulk form) (provided for

in subheading 2935.00.46) .... Free No change No change On or before 12/31/

95

9902.31.13 3-[2-(dimethylamino)ethyl]-Nmethyl-1H-indole-5-

methanesulphonamide (1:1)

succinate (sumatriptan succinate-dosage form) (provided

for in subheading 3004.90.60) Free No change No change On or before 12/31/

95

’’.

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by

2 subsection (a) applies with respect to goods entered, or

3 withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after

4 the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.

Æ
This site uses Cascading Style Sheets to present information. Therefore, it may not display properly when
        disabled.


# Population Clock

View Population Clock Data


USA Population(depicts US population)


World Population(depicts World population)


Population estimates as of April 11, 2024(date data was received)