alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
- 257 -

Nebraska Supreme Court Advance Sheets

308 Nebraska Reports

DICK v. KOSKI PROF. GROUP

Cite as 308 Neb. 257

Robert Dick, appellee and cross-appellant, v. Koski 

Professional Group, P.C., third-party plaintiff, 

appellant and cross-appellee, and Bland & 

Associates, P.C., third-party defendant, 

appellee and cross-appellant.

___ N.W.2d ___

Filed January 29, 2021. No. S-19-132.

supplemental opinion

Appeal from the District Court for Douglas County: J 

Russell Derr, Judge. Former opinion modified. Motion for 

rehearing overruled.

Robert M. Slovek and Dwyer Arce, of Kutak Rock, L.L.P., 

for appellant.

Aaron A. Clark, Ruth A. Horvatich, and Cody E. 

Brookhouser-Sisney, of McGrath, North, Mullin & Kratz, P.C., 

L.L.O., for appellee Robert Dick.

Ryan M. Kunhart and Jeffrey J. Blumel, of Dvorak Law 

Group, L.L.C., for appellee Bland & Associates, P.C.

Heavican, C.J., Cassel, Stacy, Funke, Papik, and 

Freudenberg, JJ.

Per Curiam.

This case is before us on a motion for rehearing filed 

by the appellant, Koski Professional Group, P.C. (KPG), 

Nebraska Supreme Court Online Library

www.nebraska.gov/apps-courts-epub/

02/05/2021 01:08 AM CST
- 258 -

Nebraska Supreme Court Advance Sheets

308 Nebraska Reports

DICK v. KOSKI PROF. GROUP

Cite as 308 Neb. 257

concerning our opinion in Dick v. Koski Prof. Group, 307 Neb. 

599, 950 N.W.2d 321 (2020).

We find no substantive merit to KPG’s motion and overrule 

it, but modify the opinion as follows:

(1) In the background section, under the subheading 

“Peremptory Challenges,” we withdraw the last sentence of 

the sole paragraph and substitute the following: “Other than a 

marked copy of a jury roster included in a supplemental transcript, the jury selection process is not otherwise reflected in 

the appellate record.”

(2) In the analysis section, under the subheading “Peremptory 

Challenges (Assignment of Error No. 1),” we withdraw the 

seventh paragraph and substitute the following:

We do not decide that question here. While KPG has 

offered a marked copy of a jury roster in a supplemental 

transcript, the markings on that roster do not match the 

roster’s legend sufficiently to support KPG’s claim that 

it exhausted all its peremptory challenges. As such, the 

record is insufficient to support its assignment of error 

even if we found merit to KPG’s legal premise.

The remainder of the opinion shall remain unmodified.

Former opinion modified.

Motion for rehearing overruled.

Miller-Lerman, J., not participating.
```

[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 197 (Thursday, October 10, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Page 62002]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-24411]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 8496]

In the Matter of the Designation of Muhammad Jamal, Also Known as 
Abu Ahmed, Also Known as Muhammad Jamal al-Kashef, as a Specially 
Designated Global Terrorist Pursuant to Section 1(b) of Executive Order 
13224, as Amended

    Acting under the authority of and in accordance with section 1(b) 
of Executive Order 13224 of September 23, 2001, as amended by Executive 
Order 13268 of July 2, 2002, and Executive Order 13284 of January 23, 
2003, I hereby determine that the individual known as Muhammad Jamal, 
also known as Abu Ahmed, also known as Muhammad Jamal al-Kashef, 
committed, or poses a significant risk of committing, acts of terrorism 
that threaten the security of U.S. nationals or the national security, 
foreign policy, or economy of the United States.
    Consistent with the determination in section 10 of Executive Order 
13224 that ``prior notice to persons determined to be subject to the 
Order who might have a constitutional presence in the United States 
would render ineffectual the blocking and other measures authorized in 
the Order because of the ability to transfer funds instantaneously,'' I 
determine that no prior notice needs to be provided to any person 
subject to this determination who might have a constitutional presence 
in the United States, because to do so would render ineffectual the 
measures authorized in the Order.
    This notice shall be published in the Federal Register.

    Dated: August 28, 2013.
John F. Kerry,
Secretary of State.
[FR Doc. 2013-24411 Filed 10-9-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-10-P
```
C-7 ,` ~ r C~ 

fi 

: ki, 

Qi 

~1 d ~ `~ ~ `~` `~ , J ~~ \ ` o 

IV 
77 

CA- ) 1 

V, 

U ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 

nt 

tA r6 

Sk 

Ab Sz 

I• 

C--D Z 

cl 

~ ~, ~ ~~ ~ i ~ ~ ls~ ~ ~ o 

J\lj 
~ ~ -_ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ `'~ ~ ~• ,~ - ~ •_ 

` 

~ 

~ ~ 

~ 7 

itza 

~ 

~ / ~ ~ 

S 

~ ~\4,• ti 

~i 

~C-_ ~i ~ 

~ .. ~7 ~ •j ` 

kI

N 

1 

r.,1 ® ~ ~ ~ 'V ~ ~ ` ' ~ f~ ~ 

® 

J 

`

C~ 

CC

> 

~_ ~ 
~ I ~ 

////~^\\\~1 

C (~ 

Z 

ky) 

t ` 

NJ 
i ~ 

C`,, 

,. 

- j 

~` 

i I 

,'~ ~ ~ ~ 

1 

~~ ; 

.~_~ 

\ 

~ 

~. 

~ 

~~~111 

~ 

_~ ~ 

r\-~ 

-✓ 

\ 

~ ~~'.J 

,_ 

~ 

`--~ 

~ 1`\ 

~ 

h l 

1 ~ ^ 

.~ wl 

C,~"`~~~JJJ 

~~ i 

~v 

~ i 

\ R_ 

~ _, ~ ,i ~' , 

\ ~; 

~ 

~v 

~ 

~ 

~ 

~'~C 

~ 

G 

~ 

` 

~ 

~ ~ •. ;b 

~ 

. 

~~ 

0 

~ 

~ 

~ 

~. 

~, 

~ 

~' 

~ 

'y~. 

~ 

~ 

~ 

~ ~ 

`~
Exhibit








Exhibit 10.1
OUTSIDE DIRECTOR COMPENSATION PACKAGE


Effective January 1, 2017, Atlanticus Holdings Corporation (the “Company”) will pay each outside director who is independent in accordance with the NASDAQ and SEC rules governing director independence (an “Eligible Director”) the following for service to the Company:
	
				
	Annual Cash Retainer
	$50,000
	


	Attendance Fee for Each Board Meeting (including telephonic attendance)
	$
	3,000
	


	Attendance Fee for Each Committee Meeting (including telephonic attendance)
	$
	1,500
	







In addition, the Chairman of the Audit Committee will receive an additional annual fee of $25,000.  The Chairman of each of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and the Compensation Committee will receive an additional annual fee of $10,000.   The Annual Cash Retainer and the Committee Chair fees will be paid in quarterly installments.
Each Eligible Director also will receive a restricted stock award of 19,000 shares, such grant to be effective on January 1, 2017.  The restricted stock award will vest in two equal annual installments beginning on the first anniversary of the grant date.  
The Company also will reimburse all reasonable out-of-pocket travel expenses that are incurred in connection with board and committee meetings.
U.S. flag
              An official website of the United States government Skip to main content   end of header Census.gov Newsroom Releases Miscellaneous Population
 Newsroom Archive
 Skip left menu navigation
 About the Newsroom
 				Facts for Features
 				**News Releases**
 				Press Kits
 				Tip Sheets
 Release Information CB11-TPS.41 **Contact:**  Public Information Office
301-763-3030/763-3762 (fax)
 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:  WEDNESDAY, OCT. 26, 2011 USA Counties Demographic, economic and governmental data from the Census Bureau and other federal agencies, presented for the purpose of multicounty comparisons or single county profiles. National- and state-level data are presented as well. The statistical files cover topics such as agriculture, crime, education, health, retail trade and vital statistics. New in this update are additional statistics from the 2010 Census, the 2007 Survey of Business Owners, County Business Patterns and Nonemployer Statistics. Internet address:  
<http://censtats.census.gov/usa/usa.shtml>. **No news release associated with this product. Tip Sheet only.**
  CONNECT WITH US

Information Quality
                    Data Linkage Infrastructure
                    Data Protection and Privacy Policy
                    Accessibility      
                    FOIA
                    Inspector General
                    No FEAR Act
                    U.S. Department of Commerce
                    USA.gov
                   Measuring America's People, Places, and Economy
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATION

I, Mark Shapiro, certify that:

 1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Central Parking
Corporation;

 2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

 4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

 a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

 b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

 c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control
over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent
fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting;
and

 5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors
(or persons performing the equivalent function):

 a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

 b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.

Date: May 13, 2004           By: /s/ MARK SHAPIRO
                                 ---------------------------------------------
                                 Mark Shapiro
                                 Senior Vice President and Chief Financial
                                 Officer
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.3

CONTACT:      Investor Relations                 (NYSE:  BMC)
                  (612) 851-6000                     FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

                 BMC INDUSTRIES TO SUPPLY HDTV MASKS TO THOMSON

July 5, 2000 -- Minneapolis, Minnesota - BMC Industries, Inc. has been selected
by THOMSON multimedia (NYSE: TMS) as a supplier of shadow masks for its new
lineup of Digital High-Definition Television ("HDTV") Receivers.

THOMSON multimedia, the manufacturer and marketer of RCA, GE and PROSCAN home
entertainment products in the United States as well as other major consumer
electronics brands around the world, announced earlier this month new HDTV
models that will dramatically reduce consumer prices for HDTV products.

Thomson will use BMC's shadow masks for its 38-inch widescreen high-definition
television, the world's largest direct-view widescreen HDTV. BMC's masks will be
manufactured in Cortland, New York and Mullheim, Germany through a new
manufacturing process developed by BMC for advanced televisions. "BMC is excited
to be supporting THOMSON at the forefront of the Digital TV revolution," said
Benoit Pouliquen, BMC's President and Chief Operating Officer. "We believe that
BMC is well positioned to benefit from the launch of new high-definition and
flat screen TVs worldwide."

This press release contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of
Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 that are intended to be covered by the safe harbors created
thereby. Statements made in this press release which are not strictly
historical, including statements regarding future performance, are
forward-looking statements and as such are subject to a number of risks and
uncertainties, including, among others, consumer demand for direct-view HDTV
receivers; ability to meet customer requirements; and competition with
alternative technologies and products. Certain of these and other risks and
uncertainties are discussed in further detail in BMC's Annual Report and Form
10-K for the year ended December 31, 1999 and other documents filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission.

                                     -more-
<PAGE>


BMC Industries, Inc. is one of the world's largest manufacturers of aperture
masks for color picture tubes used in televisions and computer monitors. BMC is
also a leading producer of polycarbonate, glass and plastic eyewear lenses.
BMC's common stock is traded on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol
"BMC". For more information about BMC, visit the Company's website:
www.bmcind.com.

                                      -30-
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3209 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3209

                For the relief of Kevin and Nancy Weiss.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 30, 1993

 Mr. Gingrich introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
                For the relief of Kevin and Nancy Weiss.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ROLLOVER OF GAIN ON SALE OF PRINCIPAL RESIDENCE.

    (a) In General.--For purposes of applying section 1034 of the 
Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to rollover of gain on sale of 
principal residence) with respect to the residence sold by Kevin and 
Nancy Weiss on November 2, 1987, in Ridgefield, Connecticut, the 
residence purchased by Kevin and Nancy Weiss on November 15, 1989, in 
Atlanta, Georgia, shall be treated as purchased within 2 years after 
the date of the sale of such Ridgefield, Connecticut, residence.
    (b) If refund or credit of any overpayment of tax resulting from 
the application of subsection (a) is prevented at any time before the 
close of the 1-year period beginning on the date of the enactment of 
this Act by the operation of any law or rule of law (including res 
judicata), refund or credit of such overpayment (to the extent 
attributable to the application of subsection (a)) may, nevertheless, 
be made or allowed if claim therefor is filed before the close of such 
1-year period.

                                 <all>
```
#### In the Matter of Philip Maturi, Petitioner, against John J. Balint, as Superintendent of Buildings of the City of Yonkers, Respondent.

Supreme Court, Special Term, Westchester County,

November 24, 1953.

*1012
      *John J. McQuade*for petitioner.

<7. *Raymond Hannon, Corporation Counsel,*for respondent.

Gallagher, J.

This is a proceeding under article 78 of the Civil Practice Act to compel the superintendent of buildings of the city of Yonkers to issue a building permit.

Petitioner’s application proposes to erect a building of two stories containing thirty-two rooms, a laundry and workroom, a boiler room, a kitchen and dining room and office space. Each room contains a cabinette unit with sink, range, refrigerator and cabinets, and each room has a toilet and shower. The rooms can be made interconnecting in pairs. Parking is provided for thirty-six automobiles. The property is located in a BA zone. The permit has been refused on the ground the structure is a motel which is not a permitted use in any district.

In BA districts there are allowed, among other uses, those allowed in any residential district. In multi-family residence districts there are allowed apartment houses and hotels in some *1013districts. Consequently, apartment houses or hotels are allowed in BA districts. As last amended by Yonkers General Ordinance No. 32 of 1949, both apartment houses and hotels are defined, the former as “ a building arranged, intended or designed to be occupied by three or more families living independently of each other as separate housekeeping units ”. A hotel is defined as “ a building arranged, intended or designed to be occupied, for compensation, by three or more individuals or groups of individuals living independently but having a common heating system and a general dining room ”.

The instant application, if it does not meet the definition of an apartment, certainly meets the definition of a hotel.

It is true that the instant amendment was adopted prior to the elaboration of the motel or motor court in recent years. The more modern of these structures would appear to be a simplified hotel for purely transient trade. The one at bar certainly comes within the above definition of a hotel. If the municipality seeks to differentiate between different types of hotels, it must do so specifically by ordinance. The ordinance before the court does not do so. The building for which a permit is here sought is clearly within the permitted uses of the ordinance. Petition granted. Submit order on two days’ notice.
# C_2013200EN.01000701.xml

| 12.7.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 200/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.7.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 200/7

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

11 July 2013

2013/C 200/03

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,3044 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 129,63 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4584 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,86290 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 8,7055 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,2414 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 7,9290 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 25,898 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 292,47 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,7026 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,3349 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,4275 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,5359 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,4162 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,3572 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 10,1178 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,6588 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,6460 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 467,17 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 12,9828 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,9982 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,5440 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 13 001,45 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,1327 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 56,469 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 42,5405 |
| THB | Thai baht | 40,619 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 2,9450 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 16,7374 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 78,0400 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,3044

JPY

Japanese yen

129,63

DKK

Danish krone

7,4584

GBP

Pound sterling

0,86290

SEK

Swedish krona

8,7055

CHF

Swiss franc

1,2414

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

7,9290

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

25,898

HUF

Hungarian forint

292,47

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,7026

PLN

Polish zloty

4,3349

RON

Romanian leu

4,4275

TRY

Turkish lira

2,5359

AUD

Australian dollar

1,4162

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,3572

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

10,1178

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,6588

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,6460

KRW

South Korean won

1 467,17

ZAR

South African rand

12,9828

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,9982

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,5440

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

13 001,45

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,1327

PHP

Philippine peso

56,469

RUB

Russian rouble

42,5405

THB

Thai baht

40,619

BRL

Brazilian real

2,9450

MXN

Mexican peso

16,7374

INR

Indian rupee

78,0400

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
#### Ann V. MULLEN, Appellant, v. Thomas F. MULLEN, Appellee.

No. 73-201.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Oct. 26, 1973.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
Exhibit 32.01   CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Quarterly Report of North Springs Resources Corp. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending January 31, 2012 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Harry Lappa, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.      /s/ Harry Lappa By: Harry Lappa Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer  Dated: March 21, 2012  A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
**Appendix D : Student Interview Protocol**  **Protocol G: 15 randomly selected students**  These questions are from the School

- wide Evaluation Tool (SET) 1 and Individual Students

Systems Evaluation Tool (ISSET) 2 and stay the same at each wave. Date: Interviewer_ID: District_ID: School_I D: **Introduction (introduction will be repeated for each randomly selected student at each wave; no identifiable information will be collected from the respondent):**  Hi, my name is _________ and I work with the MTSS
- B Study . We are here to learn more about yo ur school. Would y ou like to answer two questions about y our school?
1) What are the _________________ (school rules, high 5's, 3 bee’s)? (Define what the acron ym means based on information learned in principal interview.) 2) Have you received a ________________________ ___ since ________________? (reward for appropriate behavior) (2 months ago)

1 Sugai et al., 2005 2 Anderson et al., 2014.