alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 3206

To amend the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968 to

allow personnel at correctional facilities to qualify to receive certain benefits.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

SEPTEMBER 30, 1993

Mr. STRICKLAND (for himself and Mr. MANN) introduced the following bill;

which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

A BILL

To amend the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets

Act of 1968 to allow personnel at correctional facilities

to qualify to receive certain benefits.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Public Safety Officers’

5 Benefits Fairness Act’’.

6 SEC. 2. BENEFITS FOR PERSONNEL IN CORRECTIONAL

7 FACILITIES.

8 Section 1204(5) of the Omnibus Crime Control and

9 Safe Streets Act of 1968 is amended—
2

•HR 3206 IH

1 (1) by striking the comma after ‘‘corrections’’;

2 and

3 (2) by inserting in lieu thereof ‘‘(including per4 sonnel in correctional facilities),’’.

Æ
# C_2013016EN.01000901.xml

| 19.1.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 16/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.1.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 16/9

---

Call for proposals under the annual work programme on the Integrated Maritime Policy for 2012

(Commission Implementing Decision C(2012) 1447)

2013/C 16/04

The European Commission, Directorate-General for Mobility and Transport, has launched a call for proposals in order to award grants to projects in accordance with the priorities and objectives defined in the annual work programme on the Integrated Maritime Policy for 2012 adopted by the Commission on 12 March 2012 (C(2012) 1447).

The maximum amount available under this call for proposals is EUR 400 000.

The call is closing on 27 April 2013.

27 April 2013

The complete text of the call for proposals is available on:

http://ec.europa.eu/transport/facts-fundings/grants/index_en.htm

---
# C_2014046EN.01000202.xml

| 18.2.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 46/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.2.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 46/2

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.7159 — NEC/Mitsubishi/Infosec)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2014/C 46/04)

On 11 February 2014, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32014M7159. EUR-Lex is the online access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32014M7159. EUR-Lex is the online access to the European law.

---
xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?


C\_2014327EN.01000401.xml


| | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 19.9.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 327/4 |

---

Information communicated by Member States regarding State aid granted under Commission Regulation (EC) No 800/2008 declaring certain categories of aid compatible with the common market in application of Articles 87 and 88 of the EC Treaty (General Block Exemption Regulation)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2014/C 327/02

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Aid number | SA.37892 (2013/X) | |
| Member State | Italy | |
| Member State reference number | | |
| Name of the Region (NUTS) | VENETO Article 107(3)(c) | |
| Granting authority | | | | --- | | REGIONE DEL VENETO | | PALAZZO BALBI DORSODURO 3901 30123 VENEZIA | | www.regione.veneto.it | | |
| Title of the aid measure | RILANCIARE L'IMPRESA VENETA — Progetti di innovazione e di sviluppo — Modalità a sportello — anno 2013 | |
| National legal basis (Reference to the relevant national official publication) | LR 10/90 «ORDINAMENTO SISTEMA DI FORMAZIONE PROFESSIONALE E ORGANIZZAZIONE DELLE POLITICHE REGIONALI DEL LAVORO. DGR N. 1566/2009 “POLITICHE ATTIVE PER IL CONTRASTO ALLA CRISI OCCUPAZIONALE”. DGR 1675/2011 “PIANO DELLE POLITICHE ATTIVE PER IL CONTRASTO ALLA CRISI VALORIZZAZIONE DEL CAPITALE UMANO — POLITICHE PER L’OCCUPAZIONE E L'OCCUPABILITA”» — DGR 869 DEL 04/06/2013 — DDR N. 998 DEL 14/11/2013 — 7o SPORTELLO | |
| Type of measure | Scheme | |
| Amendment of an existing aid measure | | |
| Duration | 14.11.2013 — 31.12.2013 | |
| Economic sector(s) concerned | TRANSPORTATION AND STORAGE, MANUFACTURING, CONSTRUCTION | |
| Type of beneficiary | SME, large enterprise | |
| Annual overall amount of the budget planned under the scheme | EUR 0,252 (in millions) | |
| For guarantees | — | |
| Aid Instrument (Art. 5) | Direct grant | |
| Reference to the Commission decision | — | |
| If co-financed by Community funds | DGR 869 DEL 04/06/2013 — DDR N. 998 DEL 14/11/2013 — 7o SPORTELLO — EUR 0,25 (in millions) | |
| Objectives | Maximum aid intensity in % or Maximum aid amount in national currency | SME-bonuses in % |
| General training (Art. 38(2)) | 80 % | 0 % |

Web link to the full text of the aid measure:

http://www.regione.veneto.it/web/formazione/moduli-fse

Rilanciare l'impresa veneta — Progetti innovazione e sviluppo

---
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 3178

To extend retroactively until January 1, 1996, the prior suspension of duty

on amiloride hydrochloride.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

SEPTEMBER 29, 1993

Ms. MARGOLIES-MEZVINSKY introduced the following bill; which was referred

to the Committee on Ways and Means

A BILL

To extend retroactively until January 1, 1996, the prior

suspension of duty on amiloride hydrochloride.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SUSPENSION OF DUTY AMILORIDE HYDRO4 CHLORIDE.

5 Heading 9902.30.88 of the Harmonized Tariff

6 Schedule of the United States is amended by striking out

7 ‘‘12/31/92’’ and inserting ‘‘12/31/95’’.

8 SEC. 2. APPLICABILITY.

9 (a) IN GENERAL.—The amendment made by section

10 1 applies with respect to goods entered, or withdrawn from
2

•HR 3178 IH

1 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after

2 the date of the enactment of this Act.

3 (b) RETROACTIVE PROVISION.—Notwithstanding sec4 tion 514 of the Tariff Act of 1930 or any other provision

5 of law, upon proper request filed with the appropriate cus6 toms officer within 180 days after the 15th day after the

7 date of the enactment of this Act, any entry or withdrawal

8 from warehouse—

9 (1) that was made after December 31, 1992,

10 and before such 15th day; and

11 (2) with respect to which there would have been

12 no duty if the amendment made by section 1 applied

13 to such entry or withdrawal;

14 shall be liquidated or reliquidated as though such amend15 ment applied to such entry or withdrawal.

Æ
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.2

                         INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

    We consent to the incorporation by reference in this Registration Statement
on Form S-3 of Tyco International Ltd. and Tyco International Group S.A. of our
report dated September 30, 1998 (relating to the consolidated statements of
operations, changes in stockholders' equity and cash flows of United States
Surgical Corporation and its subsidiaries for the nine month period ended
September 30, 1997 and the related financial statement schedule for the nine
month period ended September 30, 1997), which report is included in Tyco
International Ltd.'s Annual Report on Amendment No. 3 on Form 10-K/A for the
year ended September 30, 1999. We also consent to the reference to us under the
heading "Experts" in the Prospectus, which is part of this Registration
Statement.

                                          /s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

Stamford, Connecticut
August 16, 2000
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-7408

STEPHAN DELANDO RITTER,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

STATE OF MARYLAND,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Greenbelt. Deborah K. Chasanow, District Judge. (CA97-3012-DKC)

Submitted: August 27, 1998 Decided: September 10, 1998

Before NIEMEYER and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Stephan Delando Ritter, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying

relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 &

Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s

opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning

of the district court. Ritter v. Maryland, No. CA-97-3012-DKC (D.

Md. Sept. 15, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

DISMISSED
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the Report on Form 10-Q of Investors Financial Services Corp. (the "Company") for the period ending March 31, 2004 as filed on May 7, 2004 and
amended on the date hereof by the filing of an amendment on Form 10-Q/A (the "Report"), I, Kevin J. Sheehan, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, hereby certify, pursuant to 18. U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



|/s/KEVIN J. SHEEHANKevin J. Sheehan
Chairman and
Chief Executive Officer |  | 
|------------------------------------------------------------------------ |  | 

November 15, 2004

A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Investors Financial Services Corp. and will be retained by Investors Financial Services Corp. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

In
connection with the Report on Form 10-Q of Investors Financial Services Corp. (the "Company") for the period ending March 31, 2004 as filed on May 7, 2004 and
amended on the date hereof by the filing of an amendment on Form 10-Q/A (the "Report"), I, John N. Spinney, Jr., Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, hereby certify, pursuant to
18. U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



|/s/JOHN N. SPINNEY, JR.John N. Spinney, Jr.
Senior Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer |  | 
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | 

November 15, 2004

A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Investors Financial Services Corp. and will be retained by Investors Financial Services Corp. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---



QuickLinks
EXHIBIT A

INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANT'S REPORT


To the Shareholders and
  Board of Directors
Pharmacia & Upjohn, Inc.

We have reviewed the condensed consolidated balance sheet of Pharmacia &
Upjohn, Inc. and Subsidiaries as of June 30, 1997, and the related
condensed consolidated statements of earnings and cash flows for the three- 
month and six-month periods ended June 30, 1997 and 1996.  These financial
statements are the responsibility of the company's management.

We conducted our review in accordance with standards established by the 
American Institute of Certified Public Accountants.  A review of interim
financial information consists principally of applying analytical
procedures to financial data and making inquiries of persons responsible
for financial and accounting matters.  It is substantially less in scope
that an audit conducted in accordance with generally accepted auditing
standards, the objective of which is the expression of an opinion
regarding the financial statements taken as a whole.  Accordingly, we do
not express such an opinion.

Based on our review, we are not aware of any material modifications that
should be made to the condensed consolidated financial statements referred
to above for them to be in conformity with generally accepted accounting
principles.

We have previously audited, in accordance with generally accepted
auditing standards, the consolidated balance sheet as of December 31,
1996, and the related consolidated statements of earnings, shareholders'
equity, and cash flows for the year then ended (not presented herein);
and in our report, dated February 26, 1997, we expressed an unqualified 
opinion on those consolidated financial statements.  In our opinion, the
information set forth in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance
sheet as of December 31, 1996, is fairly stated, in all material
respects, in relation to the consolidated balance sheet from which it
has been derived.


                                                Coopers & Lybrand L.L.P.

Chicago, Illinois
July 29, 1997
<PAGE>



                                                                    EXHIBIT 3.1

                                CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT
                                           OF
                              CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION
                                           OF
                                    DAY RUNNER, INC.


              DAY RUNNER, INC., a corporation organized and existing under the
General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware (the "Corporation"), does
hereby certify that;

                  FIRST: At a meeting of the Board of Directors of the
Corporation, the Board duly adopted resolutions setting forth a proposed
amendment to the Certificate of Incorporation of the Corporation, declaring
said amendment to be advisable and calling a meeting of the stockholders of
the Corporation for consideration thereof.

                  SECOND: Thereafter, pursuant to a resolution of the Board of
Directors of the Corporation, a special meeting of the stockholders of the
Corporation was duly called and held, upon notice in accordance with Section
222 of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware, at which meeting
the necessary number of shares as required by statute was voted in favor of
the amendment.

                  THIRD:  The resolution setting forth the amendment approved
by the vote of the stockholders and the Board is as follows:

                  RESOLVED, that the first paragraph of Article IV of the
Company's Certificate of Incorporation be amended to read in its entirety as
follows:

     "The total number of shares of all classes of stock which the corporation
     is authorized to issue is 30,000,000 shares, consisting of 29,000,000
     shares of Common Stock having a par value of $0.001 per share (the `Common
     Stock') and 1,000,000 shares of Preferred Stock having a par value of
     $0.001 per share (the `Preferred Stock'). Upon amendment of this Article
     IV, each five shares of Common Stock outstanding is combined and converted
     into one share of Common Stock. No fractional shares or scrip shall be
     issued in connection with the combination and all calculations that would
     result in the issuance of fractional shares shall be rounded to the
     nearest whole share (with .5 being rounded up)."

FOURTH:  The aforesaid amendment was duly adopted in accordance with the
provisions of Section 242 of the General Corporation Law of the State of
Delaware.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Day Runner, Inc. has caused this Certificate of Amendment
to be signed by Mark Vidovich, its authorized officer, this 27th day of April,
2000.

                                              DAY RUNNER, INC.

                                              Mark Vidovich
                                              --------------------------
                                              Chairman of the Board
Jf oui'tij Cotirt of

^an glntomo,

October 22, 2013

No. 04-13-00409-CR and 04-13-00410-CR

Roy MARTINEZ, Jr.,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 25lh Judicial District Court, Guadalupe County, Texas

Trial Court No. 12-1530-CR and 13-0756-CR-C

Honorable W.C. Kirkcndall, Judge Presiding

ORDER

The court reporter's notices of late record are DENIED AS MOOT. Appellant has filed

motions seeking to dismiss these appeals.

MarialyrKBarnaryflf, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF', have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 22nd day of October, 2013.

Keith E. Mottle

Clerk of Court
260 La. 1141

#### STATE of Louisiana ex rel. Clarence JACKSON v. C. Murray HENDERSON, Warden, Louisiane State Penitentiary.

No. 52237.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

March 8, 1972.

In re: Clarence Jackson applying for writs of habeas corpus, mandamus and certiorari.

Writ denied: The showing made is insufficient to justify the exercise of our original or supervisory jurisdiction.
#### Robert Lee McGILL, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 69-79.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

May 14, 1971.

Robert G. Ferrell, III, Public Defender, and Ned N. Julian, Jr., Asst. Public Defender, Cocoa, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, Rodney Durrance, Jr., and Charles W. Musgrove, Asst. Attys. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

On the basis of our review of the briefs and record on appeal which have been given full consideration, and appellant having failed to demonstrate reversible error, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed on the authority of Brumley v. State, Fla.App.1969, 224 So.2d 447. See also Potts v. State, Fla.App.1971, 242 So.2d 729.

Affirmed.

CROSS, C. J., and REED and MAGER, JJ-, concur.
39160 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 153 / Wednesday, August 8, 2018 / Notices 

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY 

Office of Foreign Assets Control 

Notice of OFAC Sanctions Actions; 

Sanctions Actions Pursuant to 

Directive One of Executive Order 13662 

AGENCY: Office of Foreign Assets 

Control, Treasury. 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of the 

Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets 

Control (OFAC) is publishing the names 

of persons who are no longer subject to 

the prohibitions imposed pursuant to 

Directive One under Executive Order 

13662 of March 20, 2014, ‘‘Blocking 

Property of Additional Persons 

Contributing to the Situation in 

Ukraine.’’ 

DATES: OFAC’s actions described in this 

notice were effective on July 25, 2018. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: The 

Department of the Treasury’s Office of 

Foreign Assets Control: Associate 

Director for Global Targeting, tel.: 202– 

622–2420; Assistant Director for 

Sanctions Compliance & Evaluation, 

tel.: 202–622–2490; Assistant Director 

for Licensing, tel.: 202–622–2480, 

Assistant Director for Regulatory Affairs, 

tel.: 202–622–4855, or the Department 

of the Treasury’s Office of the Chief 

Counsel (Foreign Assets Control), Office 

of the General Counsel, tel.: 202–622– 

2410. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Electronic Availability 

The Sectoral Sanctions Identification 

List (SSI List) and additional 

information concerning OFAC sanctions 

programs are available from OFAC’s 

website at http://www.treasury.gov/ofac. 

Notice of OFAC Actions 

On July 25, 2018, OFAC removed 

from the SSI List the persons listed 

below, who were subject to prohibitions 

imposed pursuant to Directive One 

under Executive Order 13662. 

Entity 

EESTI KREDIIDIPANK AS (a.k.a. AS 

EESTI KREDIIDIPANK; a.k.a. 

ESTONIAN CREDIT BANK; a.k.a. 

JOINT-STOCK COMPANY EESTI 

KREDIDIPANK), Narve Road 4, Tallinn 

15014, Estonia; SWIFT/BIC EKRD EE 

22; website http://www.krediidipank.ee; 

Executive Order 13662 Directive 

Determination—Subject to Directive 1; 

All offices worldwide; for more 

information on directives, please visit 

the following link: https://

www.treasury.gov/resource-center/ 

sanctions/Programs/Pages/ukraine.aspx

#directives [UKRAINE–EO13662] 

(Linked To: BANK OF MOSCOW). 

Dated: July 25, 2018. 

Andrea M. Gacki. 

Acting Director, Office of Foreign Assets 

Control. 

[FR Doc. 2018–16907 Filed 8–7–18; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4810–AL–P 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES
<PAGE>


                                                                     EXHIBIT 5.1


                          [PALMER & DODGE LETTERHEAD]





                                 August 14, 2000



Dyax Corp.
One Kendall Square
Building 600
Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139


         We are rendering this opinion in connection with the Registration
Statement (the "Registration Statement") on Form S-1 (Commission File No.
333-37394) of Dyax Corp. (the "Company") filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, on or about the date
hereof. The Registration Statement relates to up to 4,000,000 shares (4,600,000
shares if the underwriters' over-allotment option is exercised in full) of the
Company's Common Stock, $0.01 par value per share (the "Shares"). We understand
that the Shares are to be offered and sold in the manner described in the
Registration Statement.

         We have acted as your counsel in connection with the preparation of the
Registration Statement. We are familiar with the proceedings of the Board of
Directors on March 16, 2000 and May 10, 2000 in connection with the
authorization, issuance and sale of the Shares. We have examined such other
documents as we consider necessary to render this opinion.

         Based upon the foregoing, we are of the opinion that the Shares have
been duly authorized and, when issued and delivered by the Company against
payment therefor at the price to be determined pursuant to the Resolutions, will
be validly issued, fully paid and non-assessable.

         We hereby consent to the filing of this opinion as a part of the
Registration Statement and to the reference to our firm under the caption "Legal
Matters" in the Prospectus filed as part thereof.

                                Very truly yours,

                                /s/ PALMER & DODGE LLP

                                PALMER & DODGE LLP