alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                 Exhibit 23.1

                       Consent of Independent Accountants

The Board of Directors
Creativepro.com, Inc.:

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (No.
000-26837) on Form 8-K/A of ImageX.com, Inc. of our report dated February 29,
2000, except note 13, which is as of March 17, 2000, with respect to the
consolidated balance sheets of Creativepro.com, Inc. as of December 31, 1999 and
1998, and the related consolidated statements of operations, shareholders'
equity (deficit), and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period
ended December 31, 1999, which report appears in the Form 8-K/A of ImageX.com,
Inc. dated on or around August 25, 2000.

                                     /s/ KPMG LLP

Portland, Oregon
August 24, 2000


                                       33
#### Evelyn DAVERN, Appellant, v. Michael J. DAVERN, Appellee.

Nos. 70-922, 70-923.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

May 11, 1971.

Richard L. Lapidus, Miami, for appellant.

Phillips & Phillips, and John E. Kirk, Miami, for appellee.

Before PEARSON, C. J., and CHARLES CARROLL and BARKDULL, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

This appeal is from a post judgment order entered in a divorce suit, relating to custody. The order awarded the husband custody of the two children of the parties, sons five and seven years of age. The wife appealed, presenting three points which 1⁄8 effect represent a contention that the decision is not supported by the evidence and is against the weight of the evidence.

In the challenged order the trial court found “the best interest and welfare of said minor children would best be served by their remaining in the custody of the father,” and thereupon awarded him the custody. The trial court reached that decision after hearing from more than a dozen witnesses, whose testimony covered 268 pages of the record, and after hearing the arguments of counsel thereon covering 30 pages.

The determination of custody of the children was a matter resting in the sound judicial discretion of the trial court controlled by the law relating thereto, with *774a paramount consideration being the welfare of the children involved. Having considered the record and the arguments and briefs of counsel, we conclude no reversible error has been shown, and find no reason sufficient in law to disturb the decision of the trial court.

Affirmed.
U.S. flag
              An official website of the United States government Skip to main content   end of header Census.gov Newsroom Releases News Conferences
 Newsroom Archive
 Skip left menu navigation
 About the Newsroom
 				Facts for Features
 				News Releases
 				**Press Kits**
 				Tip Sheets
 2007-2011 American Community Survey 5-Year Estimate **News Release:** Census Bureau Releases American Community Survey Estimates, Most Detailed Portrait of Every U.S. Community **Media Advisory:** Census Bureau to Host  Web Conference on 2007-2011 American Community Survey Estimates that Provide  Statistics for Every Community across the Nation **Access the ACS 5-year Estimates**QuickFacts - Get a quick profile of your community, including the new ACS estimatesEasy Stats - Build your own table by selecting topic and geographyDetailed data - Search the 11 billion estimates on American FactFinderFTP site - Download all of the detailed tables, including for block groups **ACS Briefs**Poverty  and Shared Households by State: 2011Food  Stamp/Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) Receipt in the Past 12  Months for Households by State: 2010 and 2011Public Assistance Receipt  in the Past 12 Months for Households: 2010 and 2011Marital  Events of Selected Group Quarters Population: 2009-2011Multigenerational  Households: 2009-2011 **Technical Webinar***Monday, Dec. 3, 2012, 1 p.m. EST* Presentation Slides  Archived Webinar Transcript **Speaker**Barbara Downs, chief, Data Analysis and User Education  Branch, American Community Survey Office **Data User Guidance**2011 Data  Release 2011  Data Product ChangesDocumentationWhen to  use 1-year, 3-year, and 5-year estimatesComparison  GuidanceComparing  ACS 5-year and Census 2000Zip Code Tabulation AreasHow to Find Statistics for Your Neighborhood **Additional Resources**ACS Home Page The  Face of Government: Education
  CONNECT WITH US

Information Quality
                    Data Linkage Infrastructure
                    Data Protection and Privacy Policy
                    Accessibility      
                    FOIA
                    Inspector General
                    No FEAR Act
                    U.S. Department of Commerce
                    USA.gov
                   Measuring America's People, Places, and Economy
Exhibit 31.2
 Certification of Chief Financial Officer  Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Standard Financial Corp.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 a)
    
    designed such disclosure controls and procedures or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is
made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared;b)
    
    evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report
based on such evaluation;c)
    
    disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter
(the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants
internal control over financial reporting;
 5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
 a)
    
    all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely
affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; andb)
    
    any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting.
 May 11, 2011
    /s/ Colleen M. BrownDate
    Colleen M. BrownSenior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer 34
```

                                                                    Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATIONS

I, James A. Risher, certify that:

1. I have reviewed  this Annual  Report on Form 10-K of Del Global  Technologies
Corp.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact  necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the  circumstances  under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.  Based  on my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and  other  financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial  condition,  results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The  registrant's  other  certifying  officer(s)  and I are  responsible  for
establishing and maintaining  disclosure  controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures,  or caused such disclosure
controls and  procedures to be designed  under our  supervision,  to ensure that
material  information  relating to the  registrant,  including its  consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,  particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Evaluated the  effectiveness  of the  registrant's  disclosure  controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions  about the effectiveness
of the disclosure  controls and procedures,  as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c)  Disclosed in this report any change in the  registrant's  internal  control
over  financial  reporting  that occurred  during the  registrant's  most recent
fiscal quarter (the registrant's  fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual
report) that has  materially  affected,  or is  reasonably  likely to materially
affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying  officer(s) and I have disclosed,  based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting,  to the
registrant's  auditors  and the audit  committee  of the  registrant's  board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

All significant  deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
of internal  control over financial  reporting  which are  reasonably  likely to
adversely  affect the  registrant's  ability to record,  process,  summarize and
report financial information; and

 Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
who have a significant role in the registrant's  internal control over financial
reporting.

Date:  October 11, 2007

      /s/ James A. Risher
      -----------------
      James A. Risher
      Chief Executive Officer
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                         2,127,781
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  428,817
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    1,751,353
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               4,380,561
<PP&E>                                         1,186,589
<DEPRECIATION>                                 635,816
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 6,641,433
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          666,862
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       49,603
<OTHER-SE>                                     19,429,931
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   6,641,433
<SALES>                                        3,983,303
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               4,167,985
<CGS>                                          1,590,148
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  1,590,148
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               4,460,504
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,882,667)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (1,882,667)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,882,667)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (0.38)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (0.38)
        


</TABLE>
U.S. flag
              An official website of the United States government





---

close


back button
 Vietnam source
 Print Share
 Basic Facts Population
 People per sq. km
 Males per 100 females
 Children per woman
 Goods exported from U.S.
 Goods imported to U.S.
 Change in exports from U.S. for 2014 to 2023
 A Closer Look Source
 Comparisons
 Compared to the U.S.
 Compared to the World
 K = Thousands
                M = Millions
                B = Billions
  Merchandise Trade U.S. Trade in Manufactured Goods
 Top Exported Goods by U.S. State or Territory
 Population Current and Projected Population
 Population by Age and Sex
 Source and Notes Source: U.S. Census Bureau, International Database (demographic data) and USA Trade Online (trade data); Central Intelligence Agency, The World Fact Book (country reference maps). This application presents data for 228 countries and areas of the world with a 2024 population of 5,000 or more. For eleven of those countries and areas, only demographic data are presented. "Data not available" indicates that data are not available from this application.  In such instances, data may be available elsewhere at the census.gov website. Trade figures presented for France do not include data for overseas departments French Guiana, Guadeloupe, Martinique, Mayotte, and Reunion but do include data for dependencies Saint Barthelemy and Saint Martin.  Trade figures for the United Kingdom include data for crown dependencies Guernsey, Isle of Man, and Jersey. To learn more about world population projections, go to Notes on the World Population Clock. To learn more about international trade data, go to Guide to Foreign Trade Statistics. All trade figures are in U.S. dollars on a nominal basis.


CONNECT WITH US
 Information Quality
                    Data Linkage Infrastructure
                    Data Protection and Privacy Policy
                    Accessibility      
                    FOIA
                    Inspector General
                    No FEAR Act
                    U.S. Department of Commerce
                    USA.gov
  Measuring America's People, Places, and Economy
#### Bernard JOYCE, Appellant, v. SPITZER MOTORS OF MIAMI, INC., et al., Appellees.

Nos. 73-335, 73-420.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Nov. 20, 1973.

Rehearing Denied Dec. 11, 1973.

Podhurst, Orseck & Parks and Edward J. Sternlieb, Miami, for appellant.

Sinclair, Louis, Sand & Siegel, Miami, and John Zavertnik, North Miami Beach, for appellees.

Before BARKDULL, C. J., and PEARSON and HAVERFIELD, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. Brown v. Cahill, Fla.App. 1963, 157 So.2d 871; Williams v. Williams, Fla.App.1965, 172 So.2d 488; Maule Industries, Inc. v. Watson, Fla.App.1967, 201 So.2d 631; United Theaters of Florida, Inc., v. State, Fla.App.1972, 259 So.2d 210.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-7188

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

ALFRED IBIDA,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Baltimore. J. Frederick Motz, Chief District Judge;

Walter E. Black, Jr., Senior District Judge. (CR-95-266-JFM, CA98-1726-B)

Submitted: March 9, 2000 Decided: March 15, 2000

Before WILKINS, TRAXLER, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Alfred Ibida, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Reeves Harding, Assistant

United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Alfred Ibida seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his motion for a certificate of appealability. Because Ibida

did not timely appeal the denial of his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West

Supp. 1999) motion, he is not entitled to a certificate of appealability. Accordingly, we deny Ibida’s motion for a certificate of

appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Ka 'Ohana 0 Kalaupapa Board ofDirectors Clarence "Boogie" Kahilihiwa President Pauline Ahulau Chow Vice President Pauline Ka'iulani Puahala Hess Treasurer MaldaMalo

Director GloriaMarks

Director Mark Ellis Director Glenn Harada

Director Sol Kaho'ohalahala Director Colette Machado Director Channaine Woodward Director Sister Davilyn Ah Chick, OSF Director Patrick Boland Director Valerie Monson Coordinator and Secretary ... To Honor and To Perpetuate"

March 19, 2014 Kevin D. Schlemmer, Chief EssentialAir Service & Domestic Analysis Division U.S. Department ofTransportation 1200 NewJerseys Ave, SE Washington, DC 20590 Re: Order 2013-10-3, serving Kalaupapa, Hawaii, in support ofMakani Kai Airlines Sentvia email and US Mail Aloha Chief Schlemmer, I have been a resident of Kalaupapa for more than 50 years and serve as President ofKa 'Ohana 0 Kalaupapa, a nonprofit organization dedicated to advocating for the Kalaupapa community, developing educationalprograms and working in collaboration onthe preservation ofhistory. Our 'Ohanais made up of Kalaupapa residents, family members/descendants, friends, students, clergy and anyone interested in Kalaupapa. As you are aware Kalaupapa wentthrough a period ofpoor air service coupled with airfares thatwere more expensive than tickets from Honolulu to the West Coast. The community was so pleased when the Eseential Air Contract was awarded to Makani Kai two years ago.**Th~** service provided 

### by Makani Kai has been exemplary

- they are nearly always on time, keep the airfares reasonable and provide friendly assistance to make travel to and from Kalaupapa enjoyable again. Many ofus evenknow the owner of the airlines, Richard Shummer, by name - and he's always available to talk with us. We wrote a letter of supportlast October for Makani Kai to continue to be awarded the EAS contract, butwe understand that the deadline has been extended so we are taking this opportunity to write again with our strong supportfor Makani Kai. We believe that the Kalaupapa community is nearlyunanimous- ifnotunanimous- in their support. We understand there are other applicants for the contract and this letter is not to write disparaging of those airlines, butto urgeyou to consider the opinions ofKalaupapafirst in making this decision which willimpacttheir lives the most. We understand thatthe other applicants have letters of supportfrom people who do not live at Kalaupapa, butwe would ask you to ask them to show the letters and petitions of supportthey have from Kalaupapa residents. Many ofthose who have signed support letters for other applicants mightnever have even traveled to Kalaupapa before so this decision willnot affect them like itwill affect the people of Kalaupapa who rely onthe airlines selected to receive the EAS contract.

P.O. Box 1111 Kalaupapa, Hawai'i 96742 www.kalaupapaohana.org

### Makani Kai has served Kalaupapa in an outstanding manner. They should berewarded with that record andbe allowed to continue service here. Please listen to thevoices of Kalaupapa when you make his decision. Thankyou for this opportunity to comment.
#### Paul HARRELL v. STATE of Mississippi.

No. 47444.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

Oct. 8, 1973.

*595Thomas J. Brewer, Jackson, for appellant.

A. F. Summer, Atty. Gen., by Karen Gil-foy, Sp. Asst. Atty. Gen., Jackson, for ap-pellee.

RODGERS, Presiding Justice.

This is an appeal from a judgment of the Circuit Court of Rankin County, Mississippi, in which the trial court denied relief under application for a writ of error coram nobis sought by Paul Harrell to obtain a new trial in a case where the petitioner had pleaded guilty to armed robbery.

The petitioner contended in the trial court, and now contends here, that he was denied his constitutional right to have an attorney at a time when he was being interrogated by the officers after he had been arrested, and that the State failed to show that he effectively waived this right.

We have examined the testimony in this case, and the record shows that the officers repeatedly advised the defendant, Paul Harrell, that he could have the aid of an attorney, and that he could remain silent; but the defendant not only voluntarily confessed to the robbery, he showed the officers where the money taken from the bank was buried. There is no merit in this contention.

The petitioner also claims that his plea of guilty was not voluntarily given, but was coerced by the officers. He contends that he was promised a “light sentence” and that one of the officers threatened his family. He admitted that his attorney tried to get him to plead not guilty. He testified that he figured he would get seven (7) or twelve (12) years if he pled guilty.

The testimony of all the other witnesses refutes the contention of the prisoner. The prosecution overwhelmingly established the fact that his plea of guilty was freely and voluntarily made. Th'e mere fact that the defendant was not educated does not exempt him from punishment for a crime he obviously committed.

The judgment of the circuit judge denying a writ of error coram nobis was correct and must be affirmed.

Affirmed.

INZER, ROBERTSON, WALKER and BROOM, JJ,, concur.
**EXHIBIT 23.2**

**INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT**

    We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement Nos. 33-87344 and 333-76367 of Merix Corporation onForm S-8 of our report dated June 25, 1999, appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Merix Corporation for the year ended May 27, 2000. 

DELOITTE &TOUCHE LLP 

Portland,Oregon