alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                   Exhibit 32.2

                           SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Central Parking Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the three and nine months ending June 30, 2003 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on August 14, 2003 (the
"Report"), I, V. Jeffrey Heavrin, Chief Accounting Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (b)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.




                                                      /s/ V. JEFFREY HEAVRIN
                                                      ------------------------
                                                      V. Jeffrey Heavrin
                                                      Chief Accounting Officer

A SIGNED ORIGINAL OF THIS WRITTEN STATEMENT REQUIRED BY SECTION 906 HAS BEEN
PROVIDED TO CENTRAL PARKING CORPORATION AND WILL BE RETAINED BY CENTRAL PARKING
CORPORATION AND FURNISHED TO THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION OR ITS
STAFF UPON REQUEST.

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss 1350, and is not being filed for purposes of Section
18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be
incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before
or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in
such filing. This certification is executed as of August 14, 2003.
U.S. flag
              An official website of the United States government Skip to main content   end of header Census.gov Newsroom Releases Health Care & Insurance Income & Wealth
 Newsroom Archive
 Skip left menu navigation
 About the Newsroom
 				Facts for Features
 				**News Releases**
 				Press Kits
 				Tip Sheets
 Release Information CB12-TPS.59 **Contact:**  Public Information Office
301-763-3030
 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:  THURSDAY, SEPT. 13, 2012 Income, Poverty and Health Insurance Coverage: 2011, Live on C-SPAN's "Washington Journal" "America by the Numbers" Segment In 2011, median household income declined, the poverty rate was not statistically different from the previous year and the percentage of people without health insurance coverage decreased. Find out more on Friday, Sept. 14, at approximately 8 a.m. EDT as David S. Johnson, chief of the Social, Economic and Housing Statistics Division at the U.S. Census Bureau discusses statistics about income, poverty and health insurance coverage. Each Friday, C-SPAN's "America by the Numbers" segment features information from the federal statistical system. The program highlights the trends and allows the public to call in or email their views. More information on previous C-SPAN programs is available at 
<https://www.census.gov/newsroom/cspan.html>.
  CONNECT WITH US

Information Quality
                    Data Linkage Infrastructure
                    Data Protection and Privacy Policy
                    Accessibility      
                    FOIA
                    Inspector General
                    No FEAR Act
                    U.S. Department of Commerce
                    USA.gov
                   Measuring America's People, Places, and Economy
**Exhibit32.1**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

I, Paul J.B, Murphy, III, as Chief Executive Officer of New WorldRestaurant Group, Inc. (the “Company”), certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,that:

 

(1)          theQuarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-Q/A for the period ended September28, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”),fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)          theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| Dated: May  6, 2005 | By:                          | /s/ PAUL J.  B. MURPHY, III |   |
|---------------------|------------------------------|-----------------------------|--------|
|                | Paul J. B.  Murphy, III      |
|                | Chief  Executive Officer     |
|                | Principal  Executive Officer |

 

----
Exhibit 32

         Certification of CEO and CFO Pursuant to18 U.S.C. Section 1350

The  undersigned,  Jeremy  D.  Peter-Hoblyn  and  David  W.  Whitwell,  in their
capacities  as  Chief  Executive  Officer  and  Chief Financial Officer of Clean
Diesel Technologies, Inc. (the "Registrant") do each hereby certify with respect
to  the  Quarterly  Report  on  Form 10-Q of the Registrant for the period ended
March 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
thereof  (the  "Report"),  that,  to  the  best  of  his  knowledge:


             (1)  The  Report  fully  complies  with  the  requirements  of
       Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

             (2)  The  information  contained  in the Report fairly presents, in
       all  material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
       of  Registrant  as  of,  and  for,  the periods presented in this Report.



              /S/  JEREMY  D.  PETER-HOBLYN
              ---------------------------------------------
              JEREMY  D.  PETER-HOBLYN
              CHIEF  EXECUTIVE  OFFICER  AND  DIRECTOR
              AUGUST  13,  2004

              /S/  DAVID  W.  WHITWELL
              ---------------------------------------------
              DAVID  W.  WHITWELL
              CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER, VICE PRESIDENT ANDTREASURER
              AUGUST  13,  2004

Pursuant  to  Section  906  of  the  Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (the "Act") this
certification  accompanies  the  Report  and  shall  not,  except  to the extent
required by the Act, be deemed filed by Registrant for purposes of Section 18 of
the  Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934,  as  amended.

A  signed  original  of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document  authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears  in  typed  form within the electronic version of this written statement
required  by  Section  906, has been provided to Clean Diesel Technologies, Inc.
and will be retained by Clean Diesel Technologies, Inc. and will be furnished to
the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  or  its  staff  upon  request.


<PAGE>
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

FRANCIS RAJ,

 Petitioner - Appellant,

 v.

MICHAEL L. BENOV, Warden,

 Respondent - Appellee.

No. 11-17469

D.C. No. 1:11-cv-01165-LJO

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of California

Lawrence J. O’Neill, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted November 19, 2013** 

Before: CANBY, TROTT, and THOMAS, Circuit Judges.

Francis Raj appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment denying his 28

U.S.C. § 2241 habeas petition challenging a prison disciplinary action that resulted

in the loss of good time credits. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We

FILED

DEC 09 2013

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

 * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

 ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
review the denial of a section 2241 petition de novo, see Tablada v. Thomas, 533

F.3d 800, 805 (9th Cir. 2008), and we affirm.

Raj was found to have violated the Bureau of Prisons’ Prohibited Acts Code

104, based on his possession of a razor blade. See 28 C.F.R. § 541.13, Table 3,

Code 104 (2010) (prohibiting “[p]ossession, manufacture, or introduction of a gun,

firearm, weapon, sharpened instrument, knife, dangerous chemical, explosive or

any ammunition”). Raj contends that this finding was not supported because a

razor blade is not a “weapon” or “sharpened instrument.” This contention is

unavailing because a razor blade removed from a disposable razor is inherently

dangerous. Accordingly, Raj’s due process rights were not violated because some

evidence supports the disciplinary findings. See Superintendent v. Hill, 472 U.S.

445, 455 (1985).

In his reply brief, Raj also contends that the disciplinary hearing officer at

Taft Correctional Institution lacked authority to discipline him. Because this

contention was not raised in Raj’s petition before the district court, we decline to

consider it on appeal. See Cacoperdo v. Demosthenes, 37 F.3d 504, 507 (9th Cir.

1994) (“Habeas claims that are not raised before the district court in the petition are

not cognizable on appeal.”).

AFFIRMED. 

2 11-17469
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 3175

To extend retroactively until January 1, 1996, the prior suspension of duty

on L-alanyl - L-proline, also known as Ala Pro.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

SEPTEMBER 29, 1993

Ms. MARGOLIES-MEZVINSKY introduced the following bill; which was referred

to the Committee on Ways and Means

A BILL

To extend retroactively until January 1, 1996, the prior

suspension of duty on L-alanyl - L-proline, also known

as Ala Pro.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SUSPENSION OF DUTY ON ALA PRO.

4 Heading 9902.30.90 of the Harmonized Tariff

5 Schedule of the United States is amended by striking out

6 ‘‘12/31/92’’ and inserting ‘‘12/31/95’’.

7 SEC. 2. APPLICABILITY.

8 (a) IN GENERAL.—The amendment made by section

9 1 applies with respect to goods entered, or withdrawn from
2

•HR 3175 IH

1 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after

2 the date of the enactment of this Act.

3 (b) RETROACTIVE PROVISION.—Notwithstanding sec4 tion 514 of the Tariff Act of 1930 or any other provision

5 of law, upon proper request filed with the appropriate cus6 toms officer within 180 days after the 15th day after the

7 date of the enactment of this Act, any entry or withdrawal

8 from warehouse—

9 (1) that was made after December 31, 1992,

10 and before such 15th day; and

11 (2) with respect to which there would have been

12 no duty if the amendment made by section 1 applied

13 to such entry or withdrawal;

14 shall be liquidated or reliquidated as though such amend15 ment applied to such entry or amendment.

Æ
| 1. | The Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the period ending April 3, 2011 (the “Periodic Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and |
|----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Dated:  June 13, 2011 | /s/ Olivia W. Elliott                 |
|---------------------------------|---------------------------------------|
|                            | Olivia W. Elliott, Vice President and |
|                            | Chief Financial Officer               |
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 95-50869 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus RANDY JOE WHITE, Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. W-94-CR-68

- - - - - - - - - - August 2, 1996 Before HIGGINBOTHAM, WIENER, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Randy Joe White appeals his jury conviction for being a felon in possession of a firearm in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 922(g)(1) and 924(a). White argues that the district court committed plain error in refusing to allow a defense witness to testify because she was present during the Government’s presentation of two witness’ testimony in violation of the district court’s sequestration order. Because White and his trial counsel had knowledge and consented to the witness’No. 95-50869 - 2 - presence in the courtroom after the district court imposed the sequestration order, the district court did not commit plain error in excluding the testimony. United States v. Kilijan , 456 F.2d 555, 560 (8th Cir. 1972). White also argues that the Government did not present sufficient evidence to support his conviction for being a felon in possession of a firearm. He contends that there was not sufficient evidence that he possessed the firearm. Because White failed to move for a judgment of acquittal at the close of the evidence, his claim is reviewable only to determine whether there was a manifest miscarriage of justice. United States v. Laury , 49 F.3d 145, 151 (5th Cir.), cert. denied , 116 S. Ct. 162 (1995). We have reviewed the record and it is not “devoid of evidence pointing to guilt” or “so tenuous that a conviction would be shocking.” United States v. Pierre , 958 F.2d 1304, 1310 (5th Cir.), (en banc), cert. denied , 506 U.S. 898 (1992).
AFFIRMED.
`[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3197 Engrossed in House (EH)]

103d CONGRESS

  1st Session

                               H. R. 3197

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

To redesignate the postal facility located at 2100 North 13th Street in 
     Reading, Pennsylvania, as the ``Gus Yatron Postal Facility''.






103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3197

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT


 
To redesignate the postal facility located at 2100 North 13th Street in 
     Reading, Pennsylvania, as the ``Gus Yatron Postal Facility''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REDESIGNATION.

    The postal facility located at 2100 North 13th Street in Reading, 
Pennsylvania, and known as the Reading General Mail Facility, shall be 
known and designated as the ``Gus Yatron Postal Facility''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the postal facility referred to in 
section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the Gus Yatron Postal 
Facility.

            Passed the House of Representatives November 8, 1993.

            Attest:






                                                                 Clerk.`
An official website of the United States government                

----

end of header

Census.govNewsroomReleases

# Newsroom Archive

Skip left menu navigation                          - About the Newsroom
                          - Facts for Features
                          - **News Releases**
                          - Press Kits
                          - Tip Sheets

## Construction Industries

The Newsroom site has been redesigned and relocated.  This is the archive area.

For the most current releases please visit the redesigned newsroom at:https://www.census.gov/newsroom.html

For previous press releases please contact the Public Information Office at 301-763-3030.

### 2012

                          - December  3:   Survey of Market Absorption: 3rd Quarter 2012
                          - November 19:   Follow Residential Construction Through the Census Bureau's Mobile App
                          - June  1:   2011 Characteristics of New Housing 

CONNECT WITH US**********

                            - Information Quality
                            - Data Linkage Infrastructure
                            - Data Protection and Privacy Policy
                            - Accessibility
                            - FOIA
                            - Inspector General
                            - No FEAR Act
                            - U.S. Department of Commerce
                            - USA.gov

----

Measuring America's People, Places, and Economy

Is this page helpful?
YesNo

NO THANKS

255 characters maximum255 characters maximum reached

Thank you for your feedback.Comments or suggestions? 

PIO@census.gov
#### Benny DOUGLAS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 70-832.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Feb. 28, 1973.

T. David Burns, Bartow, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Charles Corees, Jr., Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant was indicted by the Grand Jury for murder in the first degree. He was subsequently tried and convicted of murder in the second degree and was sentenced to twenty years.

*399Appellant has assigned nine points which he contends was error committed by the trial court in the course of this trial. We have examined the record and briefs filed and no reversible error having been made to appear the judgment is therefore affirmed.

MANN, C. J., and LILES and McNULTY, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 32.1
 Certification pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
  1.
    
    the report fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934; and2.
    
    the information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 May 11, 2011
    /s/ Timothy K. ZimmermanDate
    Timothy K. ZimmermanPresident and Chief Executive OfficerMay 11, 2011
    /s/ Colleen M. BrownDate
    Colleen M. BrownSenior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer   35
EXHIBIT 32.1

                           SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION

         In connection with the quarterly report of BCS Solutions (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended January 31, 2011 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Tyler Vorhies, President
of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. SS. 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.

March 14, 2011                          /s/ Tyler Vorhies
                                        -----------------
                                        Tyler Vorhies, President, Principal
                                        Executive Officer, Principal Financial
                                        and Accounting officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Docket No: FAA - 2015 - 1270 Dir ID: 2014 - NM - 222 -AD
Exhibit 32.1

















CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. Section 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In connection with the Quarterly Report of Auscrete Corporation (the “Company’) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2016 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date here of (the “report”), I, John Sprovieri, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1.
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.
The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated this 22nd day of August, 2016.








/s/John Sprovieri/s/John SprovieriChief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
$1,642

$1,775

$1,995

$1,580

$1,138

$2,036

$1,287

$1,391 $1,452 $1,511 $1,496

$1,564

$336 $362 

$521 

$46 

($381)

$450 

-$1,000

-$500

$0

$500

$1,000

$1,500

$2,000

$2,500

2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010

Figure 1. Total State Government Revenue, General Revenue and Social Insurance Trust 

Revenue: 2005-2010

Total Revenue General Revenue Social Insurance Trust Revenue

Source: U.S. Census Bureau 2005 - 2010 Annual Survey of State Government Finances

(Billions of dollars)
# C_2014070EN.01000301.xml

| 8.3.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 70/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.3.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 70/3

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

7 March 2014

2014/C 70/03

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,3894 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 143,02 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4630 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,82850 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 8,8590 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,2191 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,2780 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 27,333 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 310,00 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,1920 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,4973 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 3,0483 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,5216 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,5261 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 10,7820 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,6341 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,7552 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 475,83 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 14,7777 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 8,5109 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,6565 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 15 821,42 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,5246 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 61,570 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 50,4997 |
| THB | Thai baht | 44,833 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 3,2387 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 18,2956 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 84,8382 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,3894

JPY

Japanese yen

143,02

DKK

Danish krone

7,4630

GBP

Pound sterling

0,82850

SEK

Swedish krona

8,8590

CHF

Swiss franc

1,2191

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,2780

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

27,333

HUF

Hungarian forint

310,00

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

PLN

Polish zloty

4,1920

RON

Romanian leu

4,4973

TRY

Turkish lira

3,0483

AUD

Australian dollar

1,5216

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,5261

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

10,7820

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,6341

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,7552

KRW

South Korean won

1 475,83

ZAR

South African rand

14,7777

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

8,5109

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,6565

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

15 821,42

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,5246

PHP

Philippine peso

61,570

RUB

Russian rouble

50,4997

THB

Thai baht

44,833

BRL

Brazilian real

3,2387

MXN

Mexican peso

18,2956

INR

Indian rupee

84,8382

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---