alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-18-00277-CR

Joseph Rauch

v.

The State of Texas

§

§

§

§

§

From the 16th District Court

of Denton County (F16-1107-16)

August 23, 2018

Per Curiam 

(nfp)

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that 

the appeal should be dismissed. It is ordered that the appeal is dismissed for 

want of jurisdiction.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

PER CURIAM
**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO**

**18      U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION      906 OF THE**

**SARBANES-OXLEY      ACT OF 2002**

|   | (i) | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section                15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|--------|-----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (ii) | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|--------|------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:                May 20, 2008 |                                                                                         |
|-----------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                              | /s/                Anthony J. Merante                                                        |
|                              | Anthony                J. Merante                                                            |
|                              | President,                Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial                Officer |

----
Exhibit 31.3

Certification of Principal Executive Officer

I, Timothy P. Walbert, certify that:



| | 1. | I have reviewed this Amendment No. 2 to the quarterly report on Form 10-Q/A of Horizon Pharma plc; and
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------





|                                                |  | 
|----------------------------------------------- |  | 
|Date: May 26, 2017                              |  | 
|                                                | 
|/s/ Timothy P. Walbert                          |  | 
|Timothy P. Walbert                              |  | 
|Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer |  | 
|(Principal Executive Officer)                   |  |
COURT OF APPEALS

	SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

	FORT WORTH

	NO. 2-06-343-CV

IN RE DAVID BLACK	RELATOR

	------------

	ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

	------------

	MEMORANDUM OPINION1

	------------

	The court has considered relator's petition for writ of mandamus and is of the opinion that relief should be denied.  Accordingly, relator's petition for writ of mandamus is denied.

	Relator shall pay all costs of this original proceeding, for which let execution issue.

								PER CURIAM

PANEL A:  DAUPHINOT, GARDNER and MCCOY, JJ.

DELIVERED: October 4, 2006
U.S. flag
              An official website of the United States government Skip to main content   end of header Census.gov Newsroom Releases 2010 Census
 Newsroom Archive
 Skip left menu navigation
 About the Newsroom
 				Facts for Features
 				**News Releases**
 				Press Kits
 				Tip Sheets
 Release Information CB11-CN.34 **Contact:**  Public Information Office
301-763-3030
 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:  TUESDAY, FEB. 15, 2011 Media Advisory — Census Bureau Ships Local 2010 Census Data to South Dakota http://www2.census.gov/census_2010/01-Redistricting_File--PL_94-171/ http://factfinder2.census.gov The data will include summaries of population totals, as well as data on race, Hispanic origin and voting age for multiple geographies within the state, such as census blocks, tracts, voting districts, cities, counties and school districts. According to Public Law 94-171, the Census Bureau must provide redistricting data to the 50 states no later than April 1 of the year following the census. As a result, the Census Bureau is delivering the data state-by-state on a flow basis in February and March. All states will receive their data by April 1, 2011.
  https://www.census.gov/rdo http://2010.census.gov/news/press-kits/redistricting.html Please visit http://2010.census.gov/2010census/data/ for an interactive map showcasing county-level population change from 1960 to 2010, as well as state-level data on race and Hispanic or Latino origin for 2010. The widget will be updated as states are released and can be embedded on your website. Follow us on Twitter, Facebook, Flickr and YouTube (/uscensusbureau).
  CONNECT WITH US

Information Quality
                    Data Linkage Infrastructure
                    Data Protection and Privacy Policy
                    Accessibility      
                    FOIA
                    Inspector General
                    No FEAR Act
                    U.S. Department of Commerce
                    USA.gov
                   Measuring America's People, Places, and Economy
OCT Li 2022

ORDERDISMISSINGAPPEAL No. 85479

. HA.PRC'WN SUPREMF: URT
TY C.1_,Ekri K.EY MAYEN BURTON, Appellant, vs. THE STATE OF NEVADA, Respondent. IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA

It I,)17A This is a pro se notice of appeal from a district court order

denying a postconviction petition for a writ of habeas corpus. Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County; Crystal Eller, Judge.

Thiscourt'sreview ofthisappeal reveals ajurisdictional defect. Specifically, the district court entered its order denying appellant'spetition
on July 18, 2022. The district court served notice of entry of that order on appellant on July 20, 2022. Appellant did not file the notice of appeal, however, until October 4, 2022, well after the expiration of the 30-day appeal period prescribed by NRS 34.575. See NRAP 4(b); Lozada u. State, 110 Nev. 349, 352, 871 P.M 944, 946 (1994) (explaining that an untimely notice of appeal fails to vest jurisdiction in this court). Accordingly, this court ORDERSthis appeal DISMISSED.



# A6.•k , J Hardesty 

## /ekSY"A—Q Stiglich Herndon 

# 2 

# 4 41 4

- "'cc: Hon. Crystal Eller, District Judge Key Mayen Burton Attorney General/Carson City Clark County District Attorney Eighth District Court Clerk

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA
tO 1.447A ,4:

4 -411t.;. , 2
**Exhibit      32.1**

**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO**

**18      U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION      906 OF THE**

**SARBANES-OXLEY      ACT OF 2002**

| (i)   | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) and                Section                15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|-----------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (ii)   | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:              August 14,              2007 |                                                                                                                          |                                                                |
|-------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                            |                                                                                                                               |
|                                                 |                                                                                                                               | /s/                Anthony J. Merante      |
|                                            | Anthony                J. MerantePresident,                Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial                Officer |

----
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

October 31, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

131313 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices 

v SC: 131313 

 COA: 266042 

Oakland CC: 1967-002894-FX 

PORFIDIO RAY ACOSTA, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the May 17, 2006 order 

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has 

failed to meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D). 

s1023 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

October 31, 2006 

 Clerk
#### Bruce David DUGGINS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 71-607.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Oct. 4, 1972.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
**Exhibit32(a)**

 

**THE DAYTON POWER ANDLIGHT COMPANY**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

The undersigned officer of TheDayton Power and Light Company (the “Issuer”) hereby certify that the Issuer’sAnnual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2005, which thiscertificate accompanies, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information containedtherein fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Issuer.

 

A signed original of thiswritten statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating,acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed formwithin the electronic version of this statement required by Section 906, hasbeen provided to the Issuer and will be retained by the Issuer and furnished tothe Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

Signed:

 
| /s/ James V.  Mahoney                  |   |
|----------------------------------------|--------|
| James V.  Mahoney                      |
| President  and Chief Executive Officer |

 

 

Date:  March1, 2006

 

The foregoing certificate is being furnishedsolely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and is not being filed as a part ofthe Issuer’s Annual Report or as a separate disclosure document.

 

----
### NUMBER 13 - 16 - 00 291 - C V COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

IN R E SHARYLAND UTILITIES, L.P.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus.

ORDER Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Rodriguez and Garza Per Curiam Order
Relator , Sharyland Utilities, L.P. , f iled a petition for writ of mandamus and
emergency motion for temporary relief in the above cause on May 31, 2016

. Through this original pro ceeding, relator seeks to compel the tri al court to withdraw a May 26, 2016 temporary restraining order requiring relator “to desist and refrain from electrifying the electromagnetic powerlines at the area of the easement” passing through the property of the real party in interest, William Gault

. Through its emergency motion for temporary relief , relator seeks to stay the temporary restraining order pending resolution of this original proceeding

.2

The Court, having examined and fully considered the motion for emergency relief , is of the opinion that the motion should be granted. Accordingly, we GRANT relator’s emergency motion for temporary relief and order the trial court’s May 26, 2016 order to be STAYED pending further order of this Court. The Court requests that Gault, o r any others whose interest would be directly affected by the relief sought, file a response to the petition for writ of mandamus on or before the expiration of ten days from the date of this order. See T EX

. R

. A PP

. P

. 52.2, 52.4, 52.8. IT IS SO ORDERED

. PER CURIAM
D elivered and filed this 1 st day of June , 201 6

.
Exhibit 32.1

















CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. Section 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In connection with the Quarterly Report of Auscrete Corporation (the “Company’) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2013 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date here of (the “report”), I, John Sprovieri, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1.
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.
The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated this 17th day of November, 2013.








/s/John Sprovieri/s/John SprovieriChief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
ex10a.htm
















Exhibit (10)(a)

















Consent of Ernst & Young LLP, Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm












We consent to the reference to our firm under the caption “Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm” in Post-Effective Amendment No. 73 to the 1933 Act Registration Statement (Form N-4 No. 333-36316) and Amendment No. 525 to the 1940 Act Registration Statement (Form N-4 No. 811-08517), and to the use therein of our reports dated (a) March 31, 2016, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of The Lincoln National Life Insurance Company and (b) April 12, 2016, with respect to the financial statements of Lincoln Life Variable Annuity Account N for the interests in a separate account under individual flexible payment deferred variable annuity contracts.







/s/ Ernst & Young LLP














Philadelphia, Pennsylvania


November 16, 2016
FILED

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

APR 29, 2010

JOHN LEY

 CLERK

[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________

No. 09-11559

Non-Argument Calendar

________________________

D. C. Docket No. 98-00085-CR-BAE-4

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

JOHNNY MACK MOBLEY,

Defendant-Appellant.

________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Georgia

_________________________

(April 29, 2010)

Before EDMONDSON, BIRCH and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Johnny Mack Mobley, proceeding pro se, appeals the denial of his motion
for a sentence reduction pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2). Mobley’s motion was

based on Amendment 706 to the Sentencing Guidelines, which reduced base

offense levels applicable to crack cocaine. On appeal, Mobley argues that the

district court: (1) erred by denying his § 3582(c)(2) motion based on his postsentencing conduct; (2) violated United States v. Booker, 543 U.S. 220, 125 S. Ct.

738, 160 L. Ed. 2d 621 (2005), by considering such conduct, (3) violated his

constitutional double jeopardy rights; and (4) erred by considering his prison

disciplinary reports without allowing him an opportunity to respond.

We review a district court’s decision not to reduce a defendant’s sentence

pursuant to § 3582(c)(2) for abuse of discretion. United States v. Moreno, 421

F.3d 1217, 1219 (11th Cir. 2005). An abuse of discretion occurs if a district court

“fails to apply the proper legal standard or to follow proper procedures in making

[its] determination.” Birmingham Steel Corp. v. TVA, 353 F.3d 1331, 1335 (11th

Cir. 2003).

In United States v. Jules, - - F.3d - -, 2010 WL 348044, at *5 (11th Cir. Feb.

2, 2010), we held that “each party must be given notice of and an opportunity to

contest new information relied on by the district court in a § 3582(c)(2)

proceeding.” In that case, the district court relied on a memorandum from the

Probation Office containing information on Jules’s prison conduct in denying his §

2
3582(c)(2) motion. Id. at *1. In this case, the district court relied on Mobley’s

prison conduct record in denying Mobley’s § 3582(c)(2) motion; however, the

record does not demonstrate that Mobley was given notice or an opportunity to

contest the information contained within that record. Thus, the district court

abused its discretion by not affording Mobley this opportunity. On remand,

Mobley must be given an opportunity to contest the information contained in his

prison conduct record. The district court is not required to grant Mobley a hearing

to contest this information; allowing him to contest it in writing is sufficient. Id. at

*5.

We reject Mobley’s additional allegations of error.

AFFIRMED, in part; VACATED, in part; AND REMANDED.

3
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 21
- 0485 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. CORY LEVI GOODMAN ,

Defendant and Appellant.

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including November 7 , 2022, within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening b rief on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

September 29 2022

09/29/2022

Case Number: DA 21-0485
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 156 (Monday, August 13, 2018)]
[Presidential Documents]
[Page 39871]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-17465]




                        Presidential Documents 



Federal Register / Vol. 83 , No. 156 / Monday, August 13, 2018 / 
Presidential Documents

___________________________________________________________________

Title 3--
The President

[[Page 39871]]

                Notice of August 8, 2018

                
Continuation of the National Emergency With 
                Respect to Export Control Regulations

                On August 17, 2001, the President issued Executive 
                Order 13222 pursuant to the International Emergency 
                Economic Powers Act (50 U.S.C. 1701 et seq.). In that 
                order, the President declared a national emergency with 
                respect to the unusual and extraordinary threat to the 
                national security, foreign policy, and economy of the 
                United States related to the expiration of the Export 
                Administration Act of 1979, as amended (50 U.S.C. 4601 
                et seq.). Because the Congress has not renewed the 
                Export Administration Act, the national emergency 
                declared on August 17, 2001, must continue in effect 
                beyond August 17, 2018. Therefore, in accordance with 
                section 202(d) of the National Emergencies Act (50 
                U.S.C. 1622 (d)), I am continuing for 1 year the 
                national emergency declared in Executive Order 13222, 
                as amended by Executive Order 13637 of March 8, 2013.

                This notice shall be published in the Federal Register 
                and transmitted to the Congress.
                <GRAPHIC(S) NOT AVAILABLE IN TIFF FORMAT>
                
                    (Presidential Sig.)

                THE WHITE HOUSE,

                    August 8, 2018.

[FR Doc. 2018-17465
Filed 8-10-18; 8:45 am]
Billing code 3295-F8-P
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 159 (Thursday, August 16, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Page 40795]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-17662]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

PRESIDIO TRUST


Notice of Public Meeting

AGENCY: The Presidio Trust.

ACTION: Notice of public meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with the Presidio Trust Act, and in accordance 
with the Presidio Trust's bylaws, notice is hereby given that a public 
meeting of the Presidio Trust Board of Directors will be held 
commencing 4:30 p.m. on September 27, 2018, at the Officers' Club, 50 
Moraga Avenue, Presidio of San Francisco, California.
    The purposes of this meeting are: To provide the Board Chair's 
report; to provide the Chief Executive Officer's report; to receive 
presentations of concept proposals for development of the Fort Scott 
site; to receive public comment on the concept proposals for the Fort 
Scott site; to consider and potentially select which proposers will be 
invited to respond to a Request for Proposal for the Fort Scott site; 
and to receive public comment on other matters pertaining to Trust 
business.
    Individuals requiring special accommodation at this meeting, such 
as needing a sign language interpreter, should contact Mollie Matull at 
415.561.5300 prior to September 18, 2018.

DATES: The meeting will begin at 4:30 p.m. on September 27, 2018.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at the Officers' Club, 50 Moraga 
Avenue, Presidio of San Francisco.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Nancy J. Koch, General Counsel, the 
Presidio Trust, 103 Montgomery Street, P.O. Box 29052, San Francisco, 
California 94129-0052, Telephone: 415.561.5300.

    Dated: August 9, 2018.
Nancy J. Koch,
General Counsel.
[FR Doc. 2018-17662 Filed 8-15-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4310-4R-P