alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              MAR-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 APR-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                         4,414
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  21,922
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (1,066)
<INVENTORY>                                    37,762
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               66,341
<PP&E>                                         32,322
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (19,902)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 92,812
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          17,244
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       328
<OTHER-SE>                                     55,416
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   92,812
<SALES>                                        138,045
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               138,045
<CGS>                                          85,163
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  129,397
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               (163)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             1,504
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                7,307
<INCOME-TAX>                                   2,836
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            4,471
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   4,471
<EPS-BASIC>                                  0.71
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0.65



</TABLE>
# t>cr-o5r - \^^ u "VUtt e 

# ^ Gogebic-Iro n Count y Airpor t GOGEBIC-IRO N AIRPOR T BOAR D Josep h Sonovetz . Chairrna n Robe d Ber g Ji m Olive r LeRo yKanga s Bria n Tarr o Bo b Mori n Joh n Will a Pau l Mullar d Donn a Scors e E556 0 Airpor t Roa d Ironwood , Michiga n 4993 8 Phone : 906-932-312 1 FAX : 906-932-440 1 e-mail ; rwdairplane@fly1roniironwoo d co m Duan e R . DuRay , Manage r Mind yPrenderville , Admi n Ass t

Apri l 30,201 0 Denni s Dcvan y Chief . Essentia ) Ai r

Servic e Division , X-S} ! OtYic e o f Aviatio n Analysi s Departmen t

o f Transportatio n 40 0 SeventhStrcet.S.W . Washington . D C Dea r Mr . DeVany . O n Apri l 29 , 2010 , th e Gogebic-Iro n Count y Aiipor f Boardhel daspecia l meetin g t o addres s th e EA S proposals . Th e publi c was invite dt o th e meetin g t o provid e opinions , concerns , an didea s regardin g th e proposal s submittetl t o th e DOT . Man y thought s and view s surface ddurin g th e meetin g an dth e Airport Boardweighe dal l o f

th e options . A vot e was take n recommendin g Great Lake s Airline s proposal b e accepte dt o provid e th e Gogebic-Iro n County Airport wit ha-)mmercia

l Airservie e fromSeptembe r 1 , 201 0 t o Augus t .31,2012 . Sincerelv . Airport Manage r
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<CIK>                         0000949373
<NAME>                        NEW WORLD COFFEE - MANHATTAN BAGEL, INC.
<MULTIPLIER>                  1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                  3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>              DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                 MAR-27-2000
<PERIOD-END>                   JUN-25-2000
<CASH>                          4,366
<SECURITIES>                    0
<RECEIVABLES>                   2,986
<ALLOWANCES>                    0
<INVENTORY>                     2,085
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                14,905
<PP&E>                          6,750
<DEPRECIATION>                  0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                  47,661
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>           7,779
<BONDS>                         15,474
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>           0
<PREFERRED>                     0
<COMMON>                        13
<OTHER-SE>                      17,929
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>    47,661
<SALES>                         8,466
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                10,168
<CGS>                           6,759
<TOTAL-COSTS>                   6,759
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                2,177
<LOSS-PROVISION>                0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>              461
<INCOME-PRETAX>                 771
<INCOME-TAX>                    0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>             771
<DISCONTINUED>                  0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                 0
<CHANGES>                       0
<NET-INCOME>                    771
<EPS-BASIC>                   .07
<EPS-DILUTED>                   .06


</TABLE>
#### Vincent H. CONBOY v. CITY OF NAPLES.

No. 39396.

Supreme Court of Florida.

March 1970.

Certiorari denied without opinion. 230 So.2d 476.
#### Gordon O’BRIEN, Appellant, v. E. Wilson PURDY, Director of Public Safety Department, Appellee.

No. 71-820.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Sept. 23, 1971.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed.
EXHIBIT
31.1




CERTIFICATION






I, Marc
Sherman, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, certify that:






1.
            I
      have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December
      31, 2007 of QSGI INC. (the
“Registrant”);






2.
            Based
      on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
      material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
      statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
      were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
      report;






3.
            Based
      on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
      included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
      financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
      Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
      report;






4.
            The
      Registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
      establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
      defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Registrant
      and have:






(a)
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;






(b)
Evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and






(c)
Disclosed in this report any change in the Registrant's internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the Registrant's most recent fiscal
quarter (the Registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report)
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
Registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and






5.
            The
      Registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
      most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to
      the Registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the Registrant's
      board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
      functions):






(a) All
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the Registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; and






(b) Any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the Registrant's internal control over financial
reporting.




Date:
      April 14, 2008
            
            /s/ Marc ShermanMarc
      Sherman
              Chairman
      and Chief Executive Officer
Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The Board of Directors
Dataram Corporation:

We consent to incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement
(No. 33-56282) on Form S-8 of Dataram Corporation and Subsidiaries of our
reports dated July 24, 2009, relating to the consolidated balance sheets of
Dataram Corporation and Subsidiaries as of April 30, 2009 and 2008, and the
related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders' equity and cash
flows for each of the years in the three-year period then ended, and the
related financial statement schedule which reports appear in the April 30,
2009 annual report on Form 10-K of Dataram Corporation.


/s/ J.H. COHN LLP

J.H. Cohn LLP
Lawrenceville, New Jersey
July 24, 2009
# C_2014210EN.01002801.xml

| 4.7.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 210/28 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.7.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 210/28

---

Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 TFEU

Cases where the Commission raises no objections

(Text with EEA relevance, except for products falling under Annex I of the Treaty)

2014/C 210/02

| Date of adoption of the decision | 15.05.2014 |
| --- | --- |
| Aid number | SA.38605 (2014/N) |
| Member State | Denmark |
| Region | — | — |
| Title (and/or name of the beneficiary) | Første skovrejsning på landbrugsarealer med henblik på at anlægge nye offentlige skove. Forlængelse af SA.33976 indtil 31/12/2014 |
| Legal basis | Lov om skove (LBK nr. 678 af 14/06/2013)
  BKG om tilskud til offentlig skovrejsning (BKG nr 1027 af 07/11/2012 med senere ændringer) |
| Type of measure | Scheme | — |
| Objective | Environmental protection, Forestry, Rural development (AGRI) |
| Form of aid | Direct grant |
| Budget | Overall budget: DKK 8 (in millions)
  Annual budget: DKK 8 (in millions) |
| Intensity | 100 % |
| Duration (period) | until 31.12.2014 |
| Economic sectors | Silviculture and other forestry activities |
| Name and address of the granting authority | Miljøministeriet, Naturstyrelsen |
| Haraldsgade 53, DK-2100 KBH Ø |

Date of adoption of the decision

15.05.2014

Aid number

SA.38605 (2014/N)

Member State

Denmark

Region

—

—

Title (and/or name of the beneficiary)

Første skovrejsning på landbrugsarealer med henblik på at anlægge nye offentlige skove. Forlængelse af SA.33976 indtil 31/12/2014

Legal basis

Lov om skove (LBK nr. 678 af 14/06/2013)

BKG om tilskud til offentlig skovrejsning (BKG nr 1027 af 07/11/2012 med senere ændringer)

Type of measure

Scheme

—

Objective

Environmental protection, Forestry, Rural development (AGRI)

Form of aid

Direct grant

Budget

Overall budget: DKK 8 (in millions)

Annual budget: DKK 8 (in millions)

Intensity

100 %

Duration (period)

until 31.12.2014

Economic sectors

Silviculture and other forestry activities

Name and address of the granting authority

Miljøministeriet, Naturstyrelsen

Haraldsgade 53, DK-2100 KBH Ø

Other information

—

The authentic text(s) of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found at:

http://ec.europa.eu/competition/elojade/isef/index.cfm.

---
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.1 Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report of Income Opportunity Realty Investors,
Inc. (the Company), on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2004, as filed
with Securities Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Ken
L. Joines, Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, and Acting
Principal Executive Officer, of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:  1.
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2.
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company. Date: August 15, 2004
    /s/ Ken L. JoinesKen L. JoinesExecutive Vice President, Chief Financial
Officer, and Acting Principal Executive
Officer
Exhibit 31.2 

 

CERTIFICATION 

 

I, Steven R. Springsteel, certify that: 

 

1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Verity, Inc.; 

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects thefinancial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 

 

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, includingits consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

 

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

 

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s mostrecent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I havedisclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

 

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses inthe design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

 

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

 

Date: April 12, 2004
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3051 Received in Senate (RDS)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3051

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

           September 22, (legislative day, September 7), 1993

                                Received

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
To provide that certain property located in the State of Oklahoma owned 
by an Indian housing authority for the purpose of providing low-income 
housing shall be treated as Federal property under the Act of September 
               30, 1950 (Public Law 874, 81st Congress).

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CERTAIN PROPERTY IN THE STATE OF OKLAHOMA OWNED BY INDIAN 
              HOUSING AUTHORITY FOR PURPOSE OF PROVIDING LOW-INCOME 
              HOUSING TREATED AS FEDERAL PROPERTY UNDER PUBLIC LAW 874, 
              81ST CONGRESS.

    (a) In General.--Any real property located in the State of Oklahoma 
that--
            (1) is owned by an Indian housing authority and used for 
        low-income housing (including housing assisted under the mutual 
        help homeownership opportunity program under section 202 of the 
        United States Housing Act of 1937), and
            (2) at any time prior to the date of the enactment of this 
        Act--
                    (A) was designated by treaty as tribal land, or
                    (B) satisfied the definition of Federal property 
                under section 403(1)(A) of the Act of September 30, 
                1950 (Public Law 874, 81st Congress),
shall be treated as Federal property under such section.
    (b) Applicability.--Subsection (a) shall apply only with respect to 
payments made under the Act of September 30, 1950 (Public Law 874, 81st 
Congress) for fiscal year 1994.

            Passed the House of Representatives September 21, 1993.

            Attest:

                                           DONNALD K. ANDERSON,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
EXHIBIT 31.1




CERTIFICATION






I, Marc Sherman, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, certify that:






1.
I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009 of QSGI INC. (the “Registrant”);






2.
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;






3.
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;






4.
The Registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Registrant and have:






(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;






(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and






(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the Registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the Registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the Registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and






5.
The Registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the Registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):






(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and






(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Registrant's internal control over financial reporting.




Date: November 4, 2011

/s/ Marc ShermanMarc Sherman

Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 11-2295

MELVIN C. BOMAR,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF BALTIMORE; DEBORAH MOORE-CARTER, 

Labor Commissioner; MARGARET B. MARTIN, Department of 

General Services Division Chief III; KHALIL ZAIED, Director, 

Department of General Services; REGINIA GRANDE-BROWN, 

Department of General Services, Personnel Director; DR. 

KEITH LEE, Mercy Medical Clinic; DR. AMY ESPY-SMITH, Mercy 

Medical Clinic; LISA CONIC, Mercy Medical Clinic,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

Maryland, at Baltimore. Richard D. Bennett, District Judge. 

(1:11-cv-00507-RDB)

Submitted: February 16, 2012 Decided: February 21, 2012

Before SHEDD, KEENAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed in part, dismissed in part by unpublished per curiam 

opinion.

Melvin C. Bomar, Appellant Pro Se. Cheryl Simpson Parker, 

Assistant City Solicitor, Baltimore, Maryland; Steven G. 

Metzger, GALLAGHER EVELIUS & JONES, LLP, Baltimore, Maryland, 

for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Melvin C. Bomar appeals the district court’s order 

dismissing his discrimination suit under Title VII of the Civil 

Rights Act of 1964 (“Title VII”), 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e and the 

Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”), 42 U.S.C. §§ 12101 

against the Mayor and City Council of Baltimore, Labor 

Commissioner Deborah Moore-Carter, Margaret B. Martin, Khalil 

Zaied, and Reginia Grande-Brown of the Department of General 

Services, as well as Doctors Keith Lee and Amy Espy-Smith, and 

Lisa Conic of the Mercy Medical Clinic. The district court 

dismissed with prejudice Bomar’s claims under the ADA for 

failure to state a cause of action. The district court further 

dismissed with prejudice Bomar’s claims under Title VII, except 

those claims against the Mayor and City Council of Baltimore.

We have reviewed the record and find no reversible 

error as to the district court’s dismissal of these claims with 

prejudice. We affirm for the reasons stated by the district 

court. Bomar v. Mayor & City Council of Baltimore, No. 1:11-cv00507-RDB (D. Md. Oct. 27, 2011).

This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final 

orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2006) and certain interlocutory and 

collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2006); Fed. R. Civ. P. 

54(b). Because the district court dismissed Bomar’s Title VII 

claims against the Mayor and City of Baltimore without 
3

prejudice, the district court’s dismissal of Bomar’s case is 

interlocutory and not appealable. Accordingly, we dismiss this 

portion of the appeal for lack of jurisdiction.

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and 

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials 

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional 

process.

AFFIRMED IN PART;

DISMISSED IN PART
Comment Info: =================

General Comment:2009-NM-201-AD.   See Attachment.