alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3233 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3233

To require the Secretary of Agriculture to take such actions as may be 
necessary to control the infestation of southern pine beetles currently 
            ravaging wilderness areas in the State of Texas.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 6, 1993

Mr. Wilson introduced the following bill; which was referred jointly to 
          the Committees on Natural Resources and Agriculture

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To require the Secretary of Agriculture to take such actions as may be 
necessary to control the infestation of southern pine beetles currently 
            ravaging wilderness areas in the State of Texas.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ACTIONS TO CONTROL THE SOUTHERN PINE BEETLE IN WILDERNESS 
              AREAS IN TEXAS.

    (a) Active Control Required.--Notwithstanding section 4(c) of the 
Wilderness Act (16 U.S.C. 1133(c)) and section 4(a) of the Texas 
Wilderness Act of 1984 (Public Law 98-574; 98 Stat. 3051), the 
Secretary of Agriculture shall undertake active measures--
            (1) to control the infestation of the southern pine beetle 
        in the five wilderness areas in the State of Texas designated 
        in section 2 of the Texas Wilderness Act of 1984; and
            (2) to prevent the spread of the southern pine beetle from 
        such wilderness areas to adjacent private forest lands.
    (b) Types of Control Measures.--Measures undertaken to control the 
infestation of southern pine beetles in wilderness areas in the State 
of Texas may include the use of salvage harvesting of timber stands 
that--
            (1) are already substantially damaged by the southern pine 
        beetle; or
            (2) will prevent the spread of the southern pine beetle to 
        healthy stands of timber.

                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 32.1

Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as

Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Digital Realty Trust, Inc. (the Company) hereby certifies, to
such officers knowledge, that:

(i) the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period ended
September 30, 2010 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates and for the periods indicated.

Dated: November 9, 2010



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/    MICHAEL F. FOUST
|Michael F. Foust       
|Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant to Securities and Exchange Commission Release 33-8238, dated June 5, 2003, this certification is being furnished and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or incorporated by reference in any registration statement of the Company filed under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.
Final Listing of Questionnaire Files for Steam Electric Rulemaking Record

Plant ID 00635

Removed 

from Public 

(Non-CBI) 

Docket1

Copyright 

Flag2File Name3

Description

x 00635\00635_Checklist.xls EPA Technical Review Checklist Workbook

00635\00635_Completeness_Checklist.xls EPA Completeness Review Checklist

x 00635\00635_Part A.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 00635\00635_Part B.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 00635\00635_Part C.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 00635\00635_Part D.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 00635\00635_Part H.xls Plant submitted survey file

00635\Certification Statement Plant ID 00635.pdf Plant certification statement

x 00635\Supplemental Documents\00635_Mitchell Diagram D-1.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 00635\Supplemental Documents\00635_Mitchell Diagram D-2.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 00635\Supplemental Documents\00635_Mitchell Diagram WB-1.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

00635\Supplemental Documents\00635_Mitchell Map-1.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

00635\Supplemental Documents\00635_Mitchell Map-2.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

00635\Supplemental Documents\00635_Transmittal letter - Georgia Power.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

1

 Final reviewed survey responses are located in the Steam Electric Technical Questionnaire Database . 

2

 Copyright documents are available from the docket. 

3

 No hardcopy log is included for this plant as no hardcopy materials were received.
Exhibit 32.2

Statement of Principal Accounting Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002, I, Stephen Feldschuh,
certify that:

      1. The annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003 of
      Daxor Corporation fully complies with the requirements of Section 13a or
      15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
      material respects, the financial condition, and results of operations of
      the Company.

      Date: April 15, 2005


      /s/ Stephen Feldschuh
      ---------------------------
      Stephen Feldschuh
      Vice President of Operations and
      Principal Accounting Officer
### IN THE TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10
- 19
- 00107
- CV IN RE JASON PAUL MIL LER
Original Proceeding

ORDER
Relator Jason Paul Miller’s Emergency Motion to Stay is granted. The trial court’s March 8, 2019 Order on Motion to Compel Discovery and for Sanctions in T rial C ourt
Cause N o. D18

- 27176

- CV in the 13th District Court of Navarro County, Texas, is stayed
pen ding further order of this Court. A response is requested to Relator’s “Petition for Writ of Mandamus.” See T EX
. R.
A PP
. P. 51.8(b). Any response must be filed with the Clerk of this Court within 21 days
from the date of this Order.
The record filed wi th Relator’s Petition for Writ of Mandamus also appears to lack material documents, e.g. , the motion to compel discovery and for sanctions. See T EX
. R.In re Miller Page 2

A PP
. P. 52.7(a)(1). The record may be supplemented pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 52.7( b).

PER CURIAM Before Chief Justice Gray, Justice Davis, and Justice Neill Order issued and filed March 29, 2019
J~~~ ED STq T

~

S 

UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 

o ~~~ r e WASHINGTON, D.C. 20460 

o 

yTq~ PROj '

G~ 2 

F E B 1 2 2013 

Mr. J. R. Stroble 

Manager, National TRU Program 

Carlsbad Field Office 

U.S. Department of Energy 

P.O. Box 3090 

Carlsbad, NM 88221-3090 

Dear Mr. Stroble: 

OFFICE OF 

AIR AND RADIATION 

On November 28, 2012, the Carlsbad Field Office (CBFO) requested, as a Tier 1(T1) change, that the 

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) approve the addition of Waste Stream SR-RH-235F.01 to 

the baseline approval for the remote-handled (RH) transuranic (TRU) waste program at the Savannah 

River Site (SRS). The enclosed report (EPA Air pocket No. A-98-49; II-A4-170) discusses EPA's 

evaluation of pertinent information and our approval. As a result, SRS may dispose of this waste at the 

Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP). 

EPA conducted a Baseline Inspection of the CCP (Central Characterization Project) RH TRU waste 

characterization program at SRS in 2011. The April 2012 SRS baseline final inspection report (see EPA 

Docket No. A-98-49; II-A4-161) documents EPA's approval of the processes for RH transuranic (TRU) 

debris waste streams. Table 1 of that (baseline) report defined the use of the MCS/ISOCS to provide any 

information other than the relative determinations of plutonium-239 ( 239Pu), 240Pu and 241Pu to 

americium-241 ( 241Am) as a T1 change that requires EPA approval before implementation. However, as 

a result of the current evaluation, EPA has made one substantive change to the SRS-CCP radiological 

characterization T1 designations shown in bold in Table 1 of the (Tier 1) report. EPA now approves the 

SRS-CCP MCS/ISOCS to measure the isotopic ratios of the constituents of RH TRU wastes irrespective 

of the radionuclides being measured. However, use of the MCS/ISOCS for direct quantification of RH 

TRU wastes for WIPP disposal is not approved. EPA also made minor modifications to the tiering table 

as part of EPA's ongoing efforts to harmonize the format and language of the tiering tables for all RH 

waste characterization programs. 

If you have any questions regarding this approval, please contact Rajani Joglekar at (202) 343-9462 or 

Ed Feltcorn at (202) 343-9422. 

Sincerely, 

Tom Peake, Director 

Center for Waste Management and Regulations 

Enclosure 

Intemet Address (URL) • http://www.epa.gov 

Recycled/Recyclable o Printed with Vegetable Oil Based Inks on 100% Postconsumer, Process Chlorine Free Recycled Paper 
cc: Electronic Distribution 

Christine Gelles, DOE EM 

Doug Tonkay, DOE EM 

Alton Harris, DOE EM 

Joe Franco, CBFO 

Marcus Pinzel, CBFO NTP 

Courtland Fesmire, CBFO QA 

Ron Reeves, WTS-CCP 

Irene Joo, WTS-CCP 

Mark Pearcy, WTS-CCP 

Trais Kilphuis, NMED 

Tim Hall, NMED 

Raymond Lee, EPA HQ 

Site Documents
Exhibit 32.2



                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                               ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In   connection with the Annual Report of Del Laboratories, Inc. (the "Company")
     on Form 10-K/A for the period ended December 31, 2003 as filed with the
     Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I
     Enzo J. Vialardi, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
     to Section 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
     Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




/S/ ENZO J. VIALARDI
------------------------------------
Enzo J. Vialardi
Chief Financial Officer
December 2, 2004
#### In the Matter of John T. Pleakis, Respondent, v Howard M. Peterson, as Executive Secretary of Office of Cattaraugus County Civil Service Commission and as Director of Personnel for County of Cattaraugus, et al., Appellants.

(Appeal No. 2.)

[722 NYS2d 777]

—Appeal unanimously dismissed without costs *(see,*CPLR 5701 [b] [1]). (Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Cattaraugus County, Feeman, Jr., J. — CPLR art 78.) Present — Pigott, Jr., P. J., Wisner, Hurlbutt, Kehoe and Lawton, JJ.
United States Court of Appeals

for the Fifth Circuit

No. 20-10614

Summary Calendar

United States of America, 

Plaintiff—Appellee,

versus

Raymond Mandell Howard, 

Defendant—Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:12-CR-159-2

Before Higginbotham, Jones, and Willett, Circuit Judges.

Per Curiam:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Raymond 

Mandell Howard has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in 

accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States 

v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Howard has not filed a response. We 

* Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this 

opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited 

circumstances set forth in 5th Circuit Rule 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

July 23, 2021

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Case: 20-10614 Document: 00515949551 Page: 1 Date Filed: 07/23/2021
No. 20-10614

2

have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record 

reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal 

presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s 

motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from 

further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See

5th Cir. R. 42.2.

Case: 20-10614 Document: 00515949551 Page: 2 Date Filed: 07/23/2021
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 3055

To revive and extend until January 1, 1996, the suspension of duty on

Tfa Lys Pro in free base and tosyl salt forms.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

SEPTEMBER 13, 1993

Mr. VALENTINE introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Ways and Means

A BILL

To revive and extend until January 1, 1996, the suspension

of duty on Tfa Lys Pro in free base and tosyl salt forms.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. REVIVAL AND EXTENSION OF DUTY SUSPEN4 SION.

5 Heading 9902.30.53 of the Harmonized Tariff

6 Schedule of the United States is amended by striking ‘‘12/

7 31/92’’ and inserting ‘‘12/31/95’’.

8 SEC. 2. APPLICABILITY.

9 (a) IN GENERAL.—The amendment made by section

10 1 applies with respect to goods entered, or withdrawn from
2

•HR 3055 IH

1 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after

2 the date of the enactment of this Act.

3 (b) RETROACTIVE APPLICATION TO CERTAIN EN4 TRIES.—Notwithstanding section 514 of the Tariff Act of

5 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1514) or any other provision of law, upon

6 a request filed with the appropriate customs officer before

7 the date that is 90 days after the date of the enactment

8 of this Act, any entry, or withdrawal from warehouse for

9 consumption, of goods described in heading 9902.30.53 of

10 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States that

11 was made—

12 (1) after December 31, 1992, and

13 (2) before the 15th day after the date of the en14 actment of this Act,

15 shall be liquidated or reliquidated as though such entry

16 or withdrawal occurred on the 15th day after the date of

17 the enactment of this Act.

Æ
Exhibit 32.01

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Yearly Report on Form 10-K of Di Giorgio Corporation (the
"Company") for the yearly period ended December 27, 2003, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Richard B.
Neff, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Lawrence S. Grossman, as
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


/s/ Richard B. Neff
-----------------------------
Richard B. Neff
Chief Executive Officer
March 9, 2004


/s/ Lawrence S. Grossman
--------------------------
Lawrence S. Grossman
Chief Financial Officer
March  9, 2004


This certification accompanies each Report pursuant to ss.906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of ss.18
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### James F. POLLACK et ux., et al., Appellants, v. METROPOLITAN DADE COUNTY, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, et al., Appellees.

No. 71-202.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Oct. 12, 1971.

Rehearing Denied Nov. 30, 1971.

James F. Pollack, Miami, for appellants.

Stuart L. Simon, County Atty. and Gary S. Brooks, Asst. County Atty., for appel-lees.

Before SWANN, C. J., and PEARSON and CHARLES CARROLL, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed, see: West Virginia Hotel Corp. v. W. C. Foster Co., 101 Fla. 1147, 132 So. 842 (1931); Lee v. Atlantic Coast Line R. Co., 141 Fla. 545, 194 So. 252 (1940); Powell v. Kelly, Fla.1969, 223 So. 2d 305.
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3321 Received in Senate (RDS)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3321

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

            November 16 (legislative day, November 2), 1993

                                Received

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
  To provide increased flexibility to States in carrying out the Low-
                 Income Home Energy Assistance Program.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. INCREASED STATE FLEXIBILITY IN THE LOW-INCOME HOME ENERGY 
              ASSISTANCE PROGRAM.

    Section 927 of the Housing and Community Development Act of 1992 
(Public Law 102-550) is amended--
            (1) in subsection (a)--
                    (A) by striking the parenthetical phrase; and
                    (B) by inserting before the period ``, except as 
                provided in subsection (d)'';
            (2) in subsection (b)--
                    (A) by striking ``such'' and inserting in lieu 
                thereof ``or receiving energy''; and
                    (B) by inserting before the period ``for any 
                program in which eligibility or benefits are based on 
                need, except as provided in subsection (d)''; and
            (3) by inserting at the end thereof the following new 
        subsection:
    ``(d) Special Rule for Low-Income Home Energy Assistance Program.--
For purposes of the Low-Income Home Energy Assistance Program, tenants 
described in subsection (a)(2) who are responsible for paying some or 
all heating or cooling costs shall not have their eligibility 
automatically denied. A State may consider the amount of the heating or 
cooling component of utility allowances received by tenants described 
in subsection (a)(2) when setting benefit levels under the Low-Income 
Home Energy Assistance Program. The size of any reduction in Low-Income 
Home Energy Assistance Program benefits must be reasonably related to 
the amount of the heating or cooling component of the utility allowance 
received and must ensure that the highest level of assistance will be 
furnished to those households with the lowest incomes and the highest 
energy costs in relation to income, taking into account family size, in 
compliance with section 2605(b)(5) of the Low-Income Home Energy 
Assistance Act of 1981 (42 U.S.C. 8624(b)(5)).''.

            Passed the House of Representatives November 15, 1993.

            Attest:

                                           DONNALD K. ANDERSEN,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
# C_2012212EN.01000101.xml

| 19.7.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 212/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.7.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 212/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.6515 — Arrow Electronics/Altimate Group)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2012/C 212/01

On 25 June 2012, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32012M6515. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32012M6515. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.

---
**Exhibit 23.1**

 

**Consent of Independent Registered PublicAccounting Firm**

 

TheBoard of Directors

SMTEKInternational, Inc.:

 

We hereby consent to the incorporation byreference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (File Nos. 333-74400,333-08689, 333-72139, 333-44612, 333-49954, 333-49956 and 333-117579) and theRegistration Statements on Form S-3 (File Nos. 333-02969 and 333-31349) ofSMTEK International, Inc. of our report dated August 5, 2004 relating to theconsolidated financial statements which appears in this annual report on Form10-K.

 

 
| /s/  PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP |
|--------------------------------------|
|                                 |
| PricewaterhouseCoopers  LLP          |
| Los Angeles,  California             |
| September 2,  2004                   |

 

----
#### Candace LANGSTON, Appellant, v. David GAIR, Appellee.

No. 72-1216.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Nov. 2, 1972.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed.