alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>   1

                                                                   EXHIBIT 24(e)


                                POWER OF ATTORNEY

         KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS that the undersigned director of United
Dominion Industries Limited hereby constitutes and appoints Richard L. Magee and
William Dries and each of them singly, his true and lawful attorney-in-fact and
agent, with full power of substitution and resubstitution, for him and in his
name, place and stead, in any and all capacities, to sign the Annual Report on
Form 10-K of United Dominion Industries Limited for the year ended December 31,
1999, and any or all amendments and supplements thereto, and to file the same
with all exhibits thereto and other documents in connection therewith, with the
Securities and Exchange Commission, the New York Stock Exchange, the Toronto
Stock Exchange and any Canadian securities commissions, granting unto said
attorney-in-fact and agent full power and authority to do and perform each and
every act and thing requisite and necessary to be done in and about the
premises, as fully to all intents and purposes as he might or could do in
person, hereby ratifying and confirming all that said attorney-in-fact and agent
may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.

  /s/ R. S. Dickson
-----------------------------------
      R. S. Dickson, Director



    February 11, 2000
# C_2014047EN.01000201.xml

| 19.2.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 47/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.2.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 47/2

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

18 February 2014

2014/C 47/03

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,3731 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 140,77 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4619 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,82330 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 8,9220 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,2221 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,3430 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 27,392 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 310,18 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,1538 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,4903 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,9933 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,5212 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,5059 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 10,6494 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,6522 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,7315 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 463,53 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 14,9064 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 8,3323 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,6628 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 16 263,96 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,5278 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 61,239 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 48,4030 |
| THB | Thai baht | 44,557 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 3,2915 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 18,1366 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 85,2820 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,3731

JPY

Japanese yen

140,77

DKK

Danish krone

7,4619

GBP

Pound sterling

0,82330

SEK

Swedish krona

8,9220

CHF

Swiss franc

1,2221

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,3430

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

27,392

HUF

Hungarian forint

310,18

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

PLN

Polish zloty

4,1538

RON

Romanian leu

4,4903

TRY

Turkish lira

2,9933

AUD

Australian dollar

1,5212

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,5059

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

10,6494

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,6522

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,7315

KRW

South Korean won

1 463,53

ZAR

South African rand

14,9064

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

8,3323

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,6628

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

16 263,96

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,5278

PHP

Philippine peso

61,239

RUB

Russian rouble

48,4030

THB

Thai baht

44,557

BRL

Brazilian real

3,2915

MXN

Mexican peso

18,1366

INR

Indian rupee

85,2820

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
#### Joseph N. TRAIGLE, Collector of Revenue v. AMI, INC., et al.

No. 53944.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Sept. 26, 1973.

In re: Joseph N. Traigle, Collector of Revenue, applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, Parish of Rapides, 280 So.2d 858.

Application not considered. Not timely filed.
# CA2013308EN.01001101.xml

| 23.10.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CA 308/11 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.10.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CA 308/11

---

ADDENDUM TO THE RESERVE LIST

OPEN COMPETITION EPSO/AD/230/12 (AD 5)

(Official Journal of the European Union C 112 A of 19 April 2013)

(Official Journal of the European Union C 112 A of 19 April 2013)

(2013/C 308 A/07)

EPSO/AD/230/12 (AD 5) — Administrators in the following fields:

| 1. | EUROPEAN PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION |
| --- | --- |

1.

EUROPEAN PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION

| 2. | LAW |
| --- | --- |

2.

LAW

| 3. | AUDIT |
| --- | --- |

3.

AUDIT

| 4. | COMMUNICATION |
| --- | --- |

4.

COMMUNICATION

| 5. | EXTERNAL RELATIONS |
| --- | --- |

5.

EXTERNAL RELATIONS

On page 3:

2.   LAW

| USHER | Josephine |
| --- | --- |

USHER

Josephine

---
This site uses Cascading Style Sheets to present information. Therefore, it may not display properly when disabled.

This site requires Javascript enabled to retrieve and display data.

# U.S. Census Bureau		Current Population	

      - U.S. Population
      - World Population

date

 | 

### 

### 

###
MT

AK

NM

OR MN

KS

SD

ND

MO

WA

FL

IL

WI NY

PA

MI

OH

IA

ME

MA

CT 

AZ

HI

NV

TX

CO

AR

LA

MS AL

TN

KY

IN

OK

CA

WY

UT

ID

NE

GA

NC

VA

SC

WV

RI 

DE 

MD 

DC 

NJ 

Figure 3.

Divorce Rates for Men by State: 2009

(For information on confidentiality protection, sampling error, nonsampling error, 

and definitions, see www.census.gov/acs/www/)

VT NH

U.S. average: 

9.2 divorces 

per 1,000 men 

15 and older

Divorce Rates and 

Statistical Significance

6.1–7.9

8.0–9.2

9.3–10.9

11.0–13.5

Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey, 2009.

• •

•

•

• •

•

•

•

• •

•

•

•

•

•

•

•

•

•

•

•

•

• Different from U.S. average

Statistical significance

Divorce rates
#### Chester R. BOLIN, d/b/a Bolin Supply Company, a/k/a Bolin Farm Supply Company, Appellant, v. FMC CORPORATION, Niagara Chemical Division, a corporation, Appellee.

No. 71-290.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

June 25, 1971.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
### Martin , Michae l (OST) From : Scot t [scott.one@gmail.com ] : \:..V;'^r':\-yrlrY. > Sent : Monday , February 06 , 201 2 9:5 5 A M ^''''^•''''•-iApJ?}-^-: ^ To : EAS(OST ) v:..;, i UFhHM i IUP ; Subject : Selectio n o f a newai rcarrie rservic e i n Presqu e Isl e L ! p !2 - i ' I wante dt o offe

r my opinio n a s asmal l busines s owne r i n Norther n Main e concernin g th e selectio n o f ane w ai r carrie r a t PQ I unde r

th e EA S program . Whil e both Peninsul aAirway s an dSovereig n Ai r both offe r proposal s tha t mee t th e bas e requirement s o f providin g non-sto p servic e t o BO S fro mPQ I - onl y Sovereig n Ai r actuall y make s aproposa l t o improv e th e rout e fro mit s curren t state. Peninsul aAirway s woul dlik e t o maintai n servic e wit h aSAA B 340 B aircraf

t whic h i s currentl y th e sam e plan e bein g use db y Colga n Air
. Whil e sufficient , i t i s no t aver y attractiv e aircraf

t t o tr y an dexpan dtraffi c t o ou r regiona l hub
. It' s loud , uncomfortabl e (with limite d spac e for talle r passengers ) an dslow
. O n th e othe r hand
. Sovereig n Ai r

with proposa l # 1 i s offerin g amor e mode mDomie r

328JE T whic h wil l lowe r roun dtri p times , increas e passenge r comfor t an doffe r an attractiv e quic k ho p for peopl e travelin g t o an dfro mBOS/PQI
. Offerin g mode mnon-sto p je t servic e woul db e agreat

ste p forwardan da

n economi c opportunit y t o mak e trave l t o thi s regio n mor e attractive
. Scott
<PAGE>

                                                              Exhibit 4.6

                                   [SPECIMEN]

                   INCORPORATED UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF
                                 DELAWARE


NUMBER                                                              SHARES
XXXXXX                                                              XXXXXX

                      JOHN DEERE CAPITAL CORPORATION

        AUTHORIZED CAPITAL_______________SHARES___________PAR VALUE

THIS CERTIFIES THAT___________________________________________is the owner of 

________________________________________________full paid and non-assessable

SHARES OF THE CAPITAL STOCK OF______________________________________________

transferable on the books of the Corporation in person or by duly authorized 
Attorney upon surrender of this Certificate properly endorsed.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF the said Corporation has caused this Certificate to be 
signed by its duly authorized officers and sealed with the Seal of the 
Corporation,

this ___________________________day               of_______________ A.D. 19___

________________________________                    __________________________
                      SECRETARY                                    PRESIDENT

                                     
<PAGE>

FOR VALUE RECEIVED, ___hereby sell, assign and transfer

unto_____________________________________________________________

___________________________________________________________Shares

represented by the within Certificate, and do hereby irrevocably constitute 
and appoint

________________________________________________________Attorney
to transfer the said Shares on the books of the within named Corporation with 
full power of substitution in the premises.

Dated____________________ 19__
     In presence of

_________________________       ___________________________________


             NOTICE: THE SIGNATURE TO THIS ASSIGNMENT
         MUST CORRESPOND WITH THE NAME AS WRITTEN UPON THE
FACE OF THE CERTIFICATE IN EVERY PARTICULAR, WITHOUT ALTERATION OR 
               ENLARGEMENT, OR ANY CHANGE WHATEVER













                           THIS SPACE IS NOT TO BE
                             COVERED IN ANY WAY
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk's Office, Atlanta, June 20, 2024. I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written. , Clerk. 

# Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA, June 20, 2024 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order A24D0352. NYOTA BAKER v. ADRIAN ALBRITTON. Upon consideration of the Application for Discretionary Appeal, it is ordered that it be hereby DENIED.
LC NUMBERS: 2021CV349554
U.S. flag
              An official website of the United States government Skip to main content   end of header Census.gov Newsroom Releases American Community Survey (ACS) Economic Census
 Newsroom Archive
 Skip left menu navigation
 About the Newsroom
 				Facts for Features
 				**News Releases**
 				Press Kits
 				Tip Sheets
 Release Information CB12-TPS.39 **Contact:**  Public Information Office
301-763-3030
 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:  MONDAY, JULY 2, 2012 Census Bureau Launches “How Do We Know?” Historical Infographic in Honor of Independence Day As we celebrate this Independence Day, we reflect on how our Founding Fathers enshrined the importance of statistics in our Constitution as a vital tool for measuring our people, places and economy. Since 1790, the U.S. Census has been much more than a simple head count; it has charted the growth and composition of our nation. The questions have evolved over time to address our changing needs. Today, the Decennial Census, the Economic Census and the American Community Survey give Congress and community leaders the information they need to make informed decisions that shape our democracy. These statistics are how we know how our country is doing. This summer, the Census Bureau will launch more infographics and interactive features that will provide a look at “How Do We Know?” Visit <https://www.census.gov/how> to view today's infographic and to learn more about “How Do We Know?” Follow @uscensusbureau on Facebook, Twitter, Flickr, YouTube and Pinterest (#HowDoWeKnow) for updates. **No news release associated with this product. Tip Sheet only.**
  CONNECT WITH US

Information Quality
                    Data Linkage Infrastructure
                    Data Protection and Privacy Policy
                    Accessibility      
                    FOIA
                    Inspector General
                    No FEAR Act
                    U.S. Department of Commerce
                    USA.gov
                   Measuring America's People, Places, and Economy
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 3214

To amend title IV of the Social Security Act to enhance educational opportunity, increase school attendance, and promote self-sufficiency among

welfare recipients.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

OCTOBER 5, 1993

Mr. KNOLLENBERG introduced the following bill; which was referred jointly

to the Committees on Ways and Means and Energy and Commerce

A BILL

To amend title IV of the Social Security Act to enhance

educational opportunity, increase school attendance, and

promote self-sufficiency among welfare recipients.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Children’s Education

5 Opportunity Act’’.

6 SEC. 2. STATE OPTION TO ESTABLISH LEARNFARE PRO7 GRAMS.

8 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 402(a) of the Social Secu9 rity Act (42 U.S.C. 602(a)) is amended—
2

•HR 3214 IH

1 (1) by striking ‘‘and’’ at the end of paragraph

2 (44);

3 (2) by striking the period at the end of para4 graph (45) and inserting ‘‘and;’’; and

5 (3) by inserting after paragraph (45) the fol6 lowing:

7 ‘‘(46) at the option of the State, provide that—

8 ‘‘(A) the needs of an individual will not be

9 taken into consideration (or will be only partly

10 taken into consideration) under paragraph (7)

11 for any month if—

12 ‘‘(i) the individual has attained the

13 age specified in the applicable State com14 pulsory school attendance law at which a

15 child must begin to attend school, but has

16 not attained 17 years of age; and

17 ‘‘(ii) the State agency determines that

18 the individual has failed without good

19 cause to regularly attend an elementary,

20 secondary, vocational school, or other ap21 propriate school; and

22 ‘‘(B) an individual whose needs are not

23 taken into consideration (or are only partly

24 taken into consideration) by reason of subpara25 graph (A) shall, nevertheless, be considered to
3

•HR 3214 IH

1 be receiving aid under this part for purposes of

2 determining—

3 ‘‘(i) the eligibility for such aid of any

4 other individual to whom paragraph (7)

5 applies; and

6 ‘‘(ii) eligibility for medical assistance

7 under the State plan approved under title

8 XIX.’’.

9 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by

10 subsection (a) shall take effect on January 1, 1994, and

11 shall apply to payments under part A of title IV and title

12 XIX of the Social Security Act for calendar quarters be13 ginning on or after such date.

Æ
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Justice Morales, Appellant.

[736 NYS2d 229]

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Laura Visitacion-Lewis, J.), entered on or about February 17, 1999, unanimously affirmed.

Application by appellant’s counsel to withdraw as counsel is granted *(see, Anders v California,*386 US 738; *People v Saunders,*52 AD2d 833). We have reviewed this record and agree with appellant’s assigned counsel that there are no non-frivolous points which could be raised on this appeal.

Pursuant to Criminal Procedure Law § 460.20, defendant has the right to apply for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals by making application to the Chief Judge of that Court and by submitting such application to the Clerk of that Court or to a Justice of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of this Department on reasonable notice to the respondent within thirty (30) days after service of a copy of this order, with notice of entry.

Denial of the application for permission to appeal by the judge or justice first applied to is final and no new application may thereafter be made to any other judge or justice. Concur— Nardelli, J.P., Tom, Sullivan, Ellerin and Rubin, JJ.
EXHIBIT 32








CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Issam Abud, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of Income Now Consulting on Form 10-Q for the three months ended November 30, 2010 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of Income Now Consulting





Date:  January 24, 2011





By: /s/ Issam AbudIssam Abud,President and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer, Principal Accounting Officer,and Principal Financial Officer)
Background ENCLOSURE 1 San Joaquin Valley Paved Road Dust Calculation for PM2.5 Based on EMFAC2011 VMT Growth

The San Joaquin Valley 2012 PM2.5 Plan (Plan) was adopted by the Air District on December2012 and approved by the Air Resources Board (ARB) as a revision to the California State Implementation Plan on January 24, 2013, and submitted to the U

.S

. Environmental Protection Agency (U.S. EPA) on March 4, 2013. Subsequently, U.S. EPA requested that paved road dust emissions be based on VMT data instead ofcenterline miles

. This minor accounting change does not impact the attainment demonstration for 2019 orthe NOx Reasonable Further Progress (RFP) demonstration contained in the Plan

. In addition, there is no impact on the transportation conformity budgets. Analysis Table 1 compares the 2014, 2017, and 2019 wintertime PM2.5 emissions for paved road dust from the Plan and the updated calculation including VMT growth based on EMFAC2011. The winter season paved road dust emissions are shown because PM2

.5 concentrations measured in the San Joaquin Valley are highest in the winter months, as documented in the Plan.

Year

2014 2017 2019 Table 1. San Joaquin Valley Winter PM2.5 Emissions 2012 PM2.5 Plan vs. Updated Calculation Projected Emissions (tpd) 2012 PM2.5 Plan Updated Calculation Paved Road Total Direct Paved Road Total Direct Dust PM2.5 Dust PM2.5 4.5 64.4 4.5 64.7 4.5 63.5 4.7 64.0 4.5 64.0 4.8 64.6 The new paved road dust emissions in 2014, 2017, and 2019 increase by zero, 0.2, and 0.3 tons per day (tpd) respectively overthe 4.5 tpd assumed in the Plan forthe same years. This minor accounting change does not impactthe attainment demonstration for 2019. Total geologic emissions were reported to be 2 to 5 percent of PM2.5 and shown to contribute a maximum of5 percent on peak days

. The RFP demonstration contained in the Plan was onlyfor NOx and is not impacted

. The Plan includes transportation conformity budgets for 2014, 2017, and 2019

. These budgets do not include paved road dustwhich was determined to be insignificant. Theupdated calculation does not impactthe insignificance determination ortransportation conformity budgets contained in the Plan as submitted. Conclusion The minor accounting change to paved road dust emissions for the Plan to replace centerline mile growth with VMT growth does not impactthe attainment demonstration for 2019, the NOx RFP demonstration, ortransportation conformity budgets contained in the Plan

.
U.S. flag
              An official website of the United States government Skip to main content   end of header Census.gov Newsroom Releases Income & Wealth Poverty
 Newsroom Archive
 Skip left menu navigation
 About the Newsroom
 				Facts for Features
 				**News Releases**
 				Press Kits
 				Tip Sheets
 Release Information CB11-06 **Contact:**  Robert Bernstein Public Information Office
301-763-3030/3672 (fax)
 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:  TUESDAY, JAN. 4, 2011 Census Bureau Releases Alternative Income and Poverty Estimates The Census Bureau has released alternative income and poverty estimates covering calendar year 2009, including breakdowns by age, sex and race. These estimates do not revise or replace the official 2009 income and poverty estimates released Sept. 16, 2010. The official estimate of the national poverty rate remains at 14.3 percent. The Census Bureau has released alternative measures of poverty for many years based on the recommendations of Congress and the National Academy of Sciences. The purpose of these alternate measures is to show the effect on income and poverty measures when factoring in a range of poverty thresholds and different assumptions about income sources (such as subsidized housing or free or reduced-price school lunches).
  CONNECT WITH US

Information Quality
                    Data Linkage Infrastructure
                    Data Protection and Privacy Policy
                    Accessibility      
                    FOIA
                    Inspector General
                    No FEAR Act
                    U.S. Department of Commerce
                    USA.gov
                   Measuring America's People, Places, and Economy
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.3

                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

         We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in this
Registration Statement on Form S-8 of our report dated December 3, 1999 relating
to the financial statements of Ling Electronics, Inc. and Subsidiary, which
appears in SatCon Technology Corporation's Current Report on Form 8-K/A, dated
October 21, 1999.

                                        /s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
                                        PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

Albany, New York
August 14, 2000
Exhibit 21.1

DEL LABORATORIES, INC. - Subsidiaries


DOMESTIC
Del Laboratories, Inc. (Delaware)
Del Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (Delaware)
565 Broad Hollow Realty Corp. (New York)
Parfums Schiaparelli, Inc. (New York)
Royce & Rader, Inc. (Delaware)
Sally Hansen, Inc. (New York)
Del International, Inc. (New York)

FOREIGN
Del Laboratories (Canada) Inc. (Canada)
Del Pharmaceutics (Canada) Inc. (Canada)
Del Laboratories Limited (U.K.)
Del Pharmaceuticals Ltd. (U.K.)
Pade Mexicana, S.A. de C.V. (Mexico)
Laboratorios del De Mexico, S.A. de C.V.
DLI (Proprietary) Ltd. (South Africa)