alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2014196EN.01000201.xml

| 26.6.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 196/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.6.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 196/2

---

Reorganisation measures

Decision on a reorganisation measure in respect of Societatea Carpatica Asig S.A.

(2014/C 196/02)

Publication made in accordance with Article 6 of Directive 2001/17/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 19 March 2001 on the reorganisation and winding-up of insurance undertakings

| Insurance undertaking | Societatea Carpatica Asig S.A., with its registered office at str. Nicolaus Olahus nr. 5, Turnul A, et.3-6, Centrul de Afaceri Sibiu, Sibiu, Romania, registered at the Office of the Trade Register with No J32/1053/29.11.1996 and Tax Code 8990884 |
| --- | --- |
| Date, entry into force and nature of the decision | Decision No 183 of 16 May 2014
  on launching the financial recovery procedure, based on a financial recovery plan, for Carpatica Asig S.A. |
| Competent authorities | The Financial Supervisory Authority (ASF), with its head office at Splaiul Independenței nr. 15, sector 5, Bucharest, Romania |
| Supervisory authority | The Financial Supervisory Authority (ASF), with its head office at Splaiul Independenței nr. 15, sector 5, Bucharest, Romania |
| Administrator appointed | — |
| Applicable law | Romania
  Government Emergency Order No 93/2012 on the establishment, organisation and functioning of the Financial Supervisory Authority, approved with amendments by Law No 113/2013, as amended;
  Law No 503/2004 on financial recovery, insolvency, voluntary dissolution and winding-up of insurance business, republished;
  Law No 32/2000 on insurance and insurance supervision, as amended. |

Insurance undertaking

Societatea Carpatica Asig S.A., with its registered office at str. Nicolaus Olahus nr. 5, Turnul A, et.3-6, Centrul de Afaceri Sibiu, Sibiu, Romania, registered at the Office of the Trade Register with No J32/1053/29.11.1996 and Tax Code 8990884

Date, entry into force and nature of the decision

Decision No 183 of 16 May 2014

on launching the financial recovery procedure, based on a financial recovery plan, for Carpatica Asig S.A.

Competent authorities

The Financial Supervisory Authority (ASF), with its head office at Splaiul Independenței nr. 15, sector 5, Bucharest, Romania

Supervisory authority

The Financial Supervisory Authority (ASF), with its head office at Splaiul Independenței nr. 15, sector 5, Bucharest, Romania

Administrator appointed

—

Applicable law

Romania

Government Emergency Order No 93/2012 on the establishment, organisation and functioning of the Financial Supervisory Authority, approved with amendments by Law No 113/2013, as amended;

Law No 503/2004 on financial recovery, insolvency, voluntary dissolution and winding-up of insurance business, republished;

Law No 32/2000 on insurance and insurance supervision, as amended.

---
<PAGE>

                                EXHIBIT 5
                                ---------

ATTORNEYS AT LAW
400 HAMILTON AVENUE
PALO ALTO, CA 94301-1825
TEL (650) 328-6561
FAX (650) 327-3699



                         August 31, 2000



Securities and Exchange Commission
450 Fifth Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20549

Ladies and Gentlemen:

     As legal counsel for iPrint.com, inc., a Delaware corporation (the
"Company"), we are rendering this opinion in connection with the registration
under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, of up to 3,728,548 shares of the
Common Stock, $0.001 par value, of the Company which may be issued pursuant to
the exercise of options and purchase rights granted under the iPrint.com, inc.
1997 Stock Option Plan, 2000 Outside Directors Stock Option Plan and 2000
Employee Stock Purchase Plan (the "Plans").

     We have examined all instruments, documents and records which we deemed
relevant and necessary for the basis of our opinion hereinafter expressed. In
such examination, we have assumed the genuineness of all signatures and the
authenticity of all documents submitted to us as originals and the conformity to
the originals of all documents submitted to us as copies. We are admitted to
practice only in the State of California and we express no opinion concerning
any law other than the law of the State of California, the corporation laws of
the State of Delaware and the federal law of the United States. As to matters of
Delaware corporation law, we have based our opinion solely upon our examination
of such laws and the rules and regulations of the authorities administering such
laws, all as reported in standard, unofficial compilations. We have not obtained
opinions of counsel licensed to practice in jurisdictions other than the State
of California.

     Based on such examination, we are of the opinion that the 3,728,548
shares of Common Stock which may be issued upon exercise of options and purchase
rights granted under the Plans are duly authorized shares of the Company's
Common Stock, and, when issued against receipt of the consideration therefore in
accordance with the provisions of the Plans, will be validly issued, fully paid
and nonassessable. We hereby consent to the filing of this opinion as an exhibit
to the Registration Statement referred to above and the use of our name wherever
it appears in said Registration Statement.

                             Respectfully submitted,

                             /s/ Gray Cary Ware & Freidenrich LLP

                             GRAY CARY WARE & FREIDENRICH LLP


                                      9
#### Howard N. PELZNER, Appellant, v. Dora SILVA et al., Appellees.

No. 71-421.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Nov. 9, 1971.

Pelzner & Schwedock, Miami, for appellant.

Smith & Koblegard, Ft. Pierce, for appel-lees.

Before SWANN, C. J., and CHARLES CARROLL and HENDRY, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See State ex rel. Branch V. DuVal, Fla.App.1971, 249 So.2d 468.
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3032 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3032

To authorize the Secretary of Transportation to issue a certificate of 
   documentation with appropriate endorsement for employment in the 
   coastwise trade of the United States for the vessel GALLANT LADY 
 (official number 986167) and the vessel GALLANT LADY (official number 
                    936769); and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 8, 1993

 Mr. Hastings introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
               Committee on Merchant Marine and Fisheries

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To authorize the Secretary of Transportation to issue a certificate of 
   documentation with appropriate endorsement for employment in the 
   coastwise trade of the United States for the vessel GALLANT LADY 
 (official number 986167) and the vessel GALLANT LADY (official number 
                    936769); and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. AUTHORIZATION OF DOCUMENTATION.

    (a) Authorization.--Notwithstanding section 27 of the Merchant 
Marine Act, 1920 (46 App. U.S.C. 883), the Act of June 19, 1886 (46 
App. U.S.C. 289), and section 12106 of title 46, United States Code, 
the Secretary of Transportation may issue a certificate of 
documentation with appropriate endorsement for employment in the 
coastwise trade of the United States for each of--
            (1) the vessel GALLANT LADY (official number 986167); and
            (2) the vessel GALLANT LADY (official number 936769).
    (b) Limitation on Authorized Trade.--Coastwise trade authorized 
under a certificate of documentation issued for a vessel under this 
section shall be limited to carriage of passengers--
            (1) who are employees of the owner of the vessel or of a 
        person that is affiliated with the owner;
            (2) who are employees of a person that has, or may have in 
        the future, a business relationship with the owner of the 
        vessel or with a person affiliated with the owner; or
            (3) in association with contributions to charitable 
        organizations, if no portion of the contributions are received, 
        directly or indirectly, by the owner of the vessel.
    (c) Expiration of Documentation.--A certificate of documentation 
issued under this section for a vessel shall not be effective after the 
date of the transfer of a controlling interest in or the ownership of 
the vessel, or the sale or other disposition of the vessel, to a person 
that is not affiliated with the person that is the owner of the vessel 
on the date of the enactment of this Act.

                                 <all>
```
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-6420

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

MICHAEL A. SHINGLER,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Albert V. Bryan, Jr., Senior

District Judge. (CR-97-318)

Submitted: May 14, 1998 Decided: June 3, 1998

Before WIDENER and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Michael A. Shingler, Appellant Pro Se. Charles Philip Rosenberg,

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Michael Shingler seeks to appeal the district court's order

denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 &

Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the district court's

opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning

of the district court. United States v. Shingler, No. CR-97-318

(E.D. Va. Mar. 11, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

DISMISSED
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2977 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2977

To amend title 38, United States Code, to provide, upon the death of a 
veteran who is receiving periodic monetary benefits from the Department 
 of Veterans Affairs, for the payment of all accrued benefits of that 
veteran to the veteran's spouse or dependent children, rather than only 
      benefits due and unpaid for a period not to exceed one year.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             August 6, 1993

 Mr. Montgomery (by request) introduced the following bill; which was 
             referred to the Committee on Veterans' Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend title 38, United States Code, to provide, upon the death of a 
veteran who is receiving periodic monetary benefits from the Department 
 of Veterans Affairs, for the payment of all accrued benefits of that 
veteran to the veteran's spouse or dependent children, rather than only 
      benefits due and unpaid for a period not to exceed one year.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PAYMENT OF ALL ACCRUED BENEFITS TO SURVIVING SPOUSE OR 
              DEPENDENT CHILDREN UPON DEATH OF BENEFICIARY.

    (a) In General.--Section 5121(a) of title 38, United States Code, 
is amended by striking out ``for a period not to exceed one year''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) shall 
take effect on October 1, 1993.

                                 <all>
```
RE: Carlsbad Energy Center - Data Request 

Tom W. Andrews 

to: 

Tom W. Andrews, Shaheerah Kelly 

06/02/2010 09:58 AM 

Cc: 

"Piantka, George" 

Show Details 

This time with the attachment.

From: Tom W. Andrews 

Sent: Wednesday, June 02, 2010 9:56 AM 

To: 'Kelly.Shaheerah@epamail.epa.gov' 

Cc: Tom W. Andrews; 'Piantka, George' 

Subject: RE: Carlsbad Energy Center - Data Request

 

Ms. Kelly:

As requested last Friday, enclosed is a summary of the annual fuel use and emissions for Encina Units 1-3 for 2009. Please give 

me a call at 916-444-6666 regarding the need for monthly fuel use/emissions for Encina Units 1-3 for the period from 1997 to 2009. 

 I’m not sure why the EPA would need monthly emissions/fuel use for a 13-year period given that PSD applicability is based on 

annual emissions.

From: Kelly.Shaheerah@epamail.epa.gov [mailto:Kelly.Shaheerah@epamail.epa.gov] 

Sent: Tuesday, June 01, 2010 4:03 PM 

To: Tom W. Andrews 

Subject: Carlsbad Energy Center - Data Request

 

Tom, 

We will need monthly, rather than annual, emissions and fuel data for the units at the Encina plant for the years 1997 to the 

present. Providing this data in an excel spreadsheet would be very helpful. Please let me know if this can be done and whether you 

can provide this info this week or at a later time. 

-Shaheerah 

************************************ 

Shaheerah Kelly 

Air Division (AIR-3) 

U S EPA Region 9 

75 Hawthorne Street 

San Francisco, CA 94105 

Phone: 415-947-4156 

Fax: 415-947-3579 

email: kelly.shaheerah@epa.gov

Page 1 of 1

6/12/2010
Encina Power Plant

2009 Annual Emissions for Units 1, 2, & 3

Unit 1 Unit 2 Unit 3 Total

Natural Gas (tons/year)

CO 14.6 29.9 14.9 59.4

NOx1 3.3 2.2 3.3 8.8

PM10 3.7 2.6 3.2 9.6

VOC 1.9 1.3 1.9 5.1

SOx1 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.5

Emission Factors2 for Units 1, 2, & 3

Factors for Natural Gas (lb/MMscf)

CO 4.18E+01 1.26E+02 4.34E+01

NOx

PM10 1.06E+01 1.10E+01 9.45E+00

VOC 5.50E+00 5.50E+00 5.50E+00

SOx

Fuel Use for Units 1, 2, & 3

Natural Gas1

(MMBtu/yr) 714,234 483,252 697,387 1,894,873Natural Gas

(MMscf/yr) 701 474 684 1,860

Notes:1. Based on information from EPA Acid Rain website (http://camddataandmaps.epa.gov/gdm/index.cfm?fuseaction=emissions.wizard).

2. SDAPCD emissions inventory report for 2009 has not been finalized yet; therefore, the emission factors from 2007 SDAPCD inventory repor
#### David STONE, Appellant, v. HERZFELD & STERN, Appellee.

No. 73-454.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Dec. 6, 1973.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                   DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                      JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                        MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                      496
<SECURITIES>                                  0
<RECEIVABLES>                                 0
<ALLOWANCES>                                  0
<INVENTORY>                                   0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            496
<PP&E>                                2,460,315
<DEPRECIATION>                                0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                        2,460,315
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                 2,285,092
<BONDS>                                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                         0
<PREFERRED>                                   0
<COMMON>                                  6,934
<OTHER-SE>                              175,222
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>          2,460,315
<SALES>                                       0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                              0
<CGS>                                         0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                 0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                         40,705
<LOSS-PROVISION>                              0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          830
<INCOME-PRETAX>                         (40,705)
<INCOME-TAX>                                  0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                     (40,705)
<DISCONTINUED>                                0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                               0
<CHANGES>                                     0
<NET-INCOME>                            (40,705)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                 0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                 0
        


</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1




Certification Pursuant to 18 USC, Section 1350,


as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





In connection with the Second Amended Report of Heartland Bridge Capital, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), James F. Groelinger, the Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 USC Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date:
April 8, 2011 By:
/s/ James F. GroelingerName: James F. GroelingerTitle:   Chief Executive Officer





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Heartland Bridge Capital, Inc. and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit



Exhibit 10.45



AMENDMENT TO THE 
VALVOLINE LLC NONQUALIFIED EXCESS BENEFIT PLAN
WHEREAS, Valvoline LLC (“Valvoline”) sponsors for the benefit of certain of its employees the Ashland Inc. Nonqualified Excess Benefit Plan (the “Excess Plan”); and
WHEREAS, Valvoline desires to cease future benefit accrual under the terms of the Excess Plan effective as of September 30, 2016 (the “Effective Date”); 
NOW, THEREFORE, the Excess Plan shall be amended as follows:
I.    Section 3(v) shall be added to the Plan to read as follows:
(v)    Plan Benefit Freeze. The benefit accrual of a Participant shall cease as of September 30, 2016 and no service or compensation of a Participant following that date shall result in any additional benefit due under this Plan. Notwithstanding the provisions of this Section 3(v), any early retirement benefits and subsidization reduction factors to all Participants providing services as of September 30, 2016 shall be provided if the Participant attains age 55 prior to retirement. In addition, any “Rule of 80” requirement to receive an early retirement or subsidized benefit shall be applied by including all service with both Ashland Inc. and Valvoline LLC for Participants for so long as Ashland Inc. (or any entity within the controlled group of Ashland Inc. determined in accordance with Section 414 of the Internal Revenue Code) remains in the same controlled group, as determined within Section 414 of the Internal Revenue Code, of Valvoline LLC. Upon the cessation of Ashland Inc. and Valvoline LLC to be within the same controlled group, determined in accordance with Section 414 of the Internal Revenue Code, only service with Valvoline LLC (or any entity within its controlled group determined in accordance with Section 414 of the Internal Revenue Code) shall be included in determining satisfaction of the “Rule of 80.” For the purpose of determining whether a Participant separates from service, so long as a Participant remains a service provider (within the terms of Code section 409A) for Valvoline LLC or Ashland LLC (or any entity within the controlled group of such entity determined in accordance with Section 414 of the Code), the Participant shall not be deemed to have incurred a separation from service.
II.    In all other respect the Plan shall remain unchanged.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this amendment to the Plan has been is executed this 30th day of September, 2016, to be effective as of the date indicated above.




/s/ Peter J. Ganz
By:_____________________________________
Peter J. Ganz
Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary
250 La. 534

#### Raymond BROWN et al. v. B & G CRANE SERVICE, INC., and/or Sun Erection Co., Inc., et al.

No. 48630.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 14, 1967.

In re: Raymond Brown and Jack O’Shea applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, Parish of Orleans. 194 So.2d 746.

Writ refused. On the factual finding of the Court of Appeal, there is no error of law in its judgment.
<PAGE>

                   CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS



As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the incorporation by
reference in this registration statement of our reports dated January 20,
2000, except with respect to certain information in Note M as to which the
date is March 8, 2000 and Note N as to which the date is May 31, 2000
included in Lone Star Technologies, Inc. Form 10-K/A for the year ended
December 31, 1999 and to all references to our Firm included in this
registration statement.



Dallas, Texas
 September 19, 2000

<PAGE>

                   CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS



As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the incorporation by
reference in this registration statement of our report on the consolidated
financial statements of Fintube Limited Partnership, dated February 4, 2000
included in Lone Star Technologies, Inc. Form 8-K, as amended, dated June 1,
2000 and to all references to our Firm included in this registration
statement.



Tulsa, Oklahoma
 September 19, 2000
EXHIBIT 32.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT
Section 1350 Certification In connection
with the annual report of Hydron Technologies, Inc. (the Company) on Form
10-K for the year ended September 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Richard Banakus, Interim President and
Principal Financial and Accounting Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. SS. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that: 1. The Report
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 2. The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company. HYDRON TECHNOLOGIES, INC./s/: Richard
  BanakusRichard BanakusInterim President, Principal Financial and Accounting OfficerJanuary 12, 2009