alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
250 La. 533

#### Jack N. DYER v. Alvin J. DAVIS et al.

No. 48405.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 14, 1967.

In re: Jack N. Dyer applying for certio-rari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, Parish of East Baton Rouge. 189 So.2d 678.

Writ refused. The result is correct.
#### Fred Lawrence SNYDER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 73-973.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Feb. 15, 1974.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 159 (Thursday, August 16, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Page 40777]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-17677]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute on Drug Abuse; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute on Drug Abuse Special 
Emphasis Panel; SEP for NIDA Medications Development.
    Date: September 28, 2018.
    Time: 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate cooperative agreement 
applications.
    Place: Hilton Garden Inn Bethesda, 7301 Waverly Street, 
Bethesda, MD 20814.
    Contact Person: Ivan K. Navarro, Ph.D., Scientific Review 
Officer, Office of Extramural Policy and Review, Division of 
Extramural Research, National Institute on Drug Abuse, NIH, DHHS, 
6001 Executive Boulevard, Room 4242, MSC 9550, Bethesda, MD 20892, 
301-827-5833, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#9ef7e8fff0b0f0ffe8ffececf1def0f7f6b0f9f1e8"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="aec7d8cfc080c0cfd8cfdcdcc1eec0c7c680c9c1d8">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos.: 93.279, Drug 
Abuse and Addiction Research Programs, National Institutes of 
Health, HHS)

    Dated: August 10, 2018.
Natasha M. Copeland,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2018-17677 Filed 8-15-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:

MONDAY, JULY 23, 2012

Robert Bernstein CB12-131

Public Information Office 

301-763-3030

e-mail: <pio@census.gov> 

U.S. Launches Interactive HIV/AIDS Database

on Census.gov

The U.S. Census Bureau today launched an interactive global resource on the prevalence of 

HIV infection and AIDS cases and deaths. The database was developed in 1987 and now holds 

149,000 statistics, an increase of approximately 10,800 new estimates in the last year, making it 

the most complete of its kind in the world. The launch comes as thousands of people worldwide 

meet in Washington, D.C., for the International AIDS Conference this week.

The resource is maintained by the Census Bureau with funding from the U.S. President’s 

Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR) through the United States Agency for International 

Development (USAID).

U.S. Global AIDS Coordinator Ambassador Eric Goosby, head of PEPFAR, said on the 

launch, “This release of the HIV/AIDS database will expand global access to data that are critical 

to understanding the epidemic. This information is invaluable for the evidence-based response 

PEPFAR is championing.”

Census Bureau Director Robert Groves said “This database provides the people who need it 

with quality statistics ─ supporting the life-saving efforts of our partners at PEPFAR and USAID 

and the doctors, nurses and public health officials working to reach the end of AIDS.”

The tool is a library of statistics from more than 12,000 articles in international scientific and 

medical journals, individual countries’ annual HIV/AIDS surveillance reports, and papers and 

posters presented at international conferences.

The menu-driven access tool permits users to search for statistical information in countries 

and territories across the world, as well as by subpopulation, geographic subarea (such as urban 

and rural), age, sex and year (back to 1960). 

Statistics for the United States are available separately from the Centers for Disease Control and 

Prevention.

-X-
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AND CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS INCLUDED IN
THE COMPANY'S FORM 10-Q AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          APR-28-2001
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-30-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUL-29-2000
<CASH>                                          45,759
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  270,769
<ALLOWANCES>                                  (11,169)
<INVENTORY>                                    153,239
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               568,022
<PP&E>                                         360,979
<DEPRECIATION>                               (155,249)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,717,921
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          413,625
<BONDS>                                      1,051,329
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            37
<OTHER-SE>                                     224,303
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,717,921
<SALES>                                        545,771
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               545,771
<CGS>                                          402,283
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  150,561<F1>
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                20,537<F2>
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   573
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              29,785
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (57,968)
<INCOME-TAX>                                  (12,853)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (45,115)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (1.22)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.22)
<FN>
<F1>Includes $2,795 of operating restructuring costs.
<F2>Includes $19,668 of foreign currency transaction loss.
</FN>


</TABLE>
# C_2013303EN.01000301.xml

| 19.10.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 303/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.10.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 303/3

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.6987 — BP Europa/Grupa Lotos/Lotos Tank)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2013/C 303/02

On 11 October 2013, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32013M6987. EUR-Lex is the online access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32013M6987. EUR-Lex is the online access to the European law.

---
```

[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 95 (Tuesday, May 17, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 28425]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-12180]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION

Sunshine Act Meetings

TIME AND DATE: 11 a.m., Friday June 10, 2011.

PLACE: 1155 21st St., NW., Washington, DC, 9th Floor Commission 
Conference Room.

STATUS: Closed.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: Surveillance and Enforcement Matters.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Sauntia S. Warfield, 202-418-5084.

Sauntia S. Warfield,
Assistant Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2011-12180 Filed 5-13-11; 11:15 am]
BILLING CODE 6351-01-P
```
<PAGE>

                                                                  EXHIBIT 21.1




List of Subsidiaries


ENTITY                               JURISDICTION OF ORGANIZATION
------                               ----------------------------
iTurf Finance Company                Delaware
Ontap.com Inc.                       New Jersey
TheSpark.com Inc.                    Massachusetts
#### Sidney W. SMITH, Appellant v. Roy RENDERER, Appellee.

No. 66-1073.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Third District.

Nov. 7, 1967.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion

should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited

circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-40160

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

GUSTAVO CASTILLO-MEDINA

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 1:06-CR-1007-1

Before WIENER, GARZA, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Gustavo Castillo-Medina appeals his conviction and sentence for illegal

reentry following deportation in violation of 8 U.S.C. §§ 1326(a) and (b).

Castillo-Medina argues that the district court erred in applying a 16-level

enhancement pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 2L1.2(b)(1)(A)(ii), based on the

determination that his 1992 Texas conviction for burglary of a habitation

constitutes a crime of violence. Because Castillo-Medina did not object to the

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

October 18, 2007

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk
No. 07-40160

2

imposition of the enhancement in the district court, review is for plain error.

See United States v. Garza-Lopez, 410 F.3d 268, 272 (5th Cir. 2005).

Castillo-Medina recognizes that this court has previously held that an

offense committed under TEX. PENAL CODE § 30.02(a)(1), the statute of his

conviction, is a crime of violence for purposes of § 2L1.2, but argues that the

Supreme Court’s recent decision in James v. United States, 127 S. Ct. 1586,

1599-1600 (2007), overrules this circuit’s precedent. His argument is

unpersuasive.

In United States v. Gomez-Guerra, 485 F.3d 301, 304 & n.3 (5th Cir. 2007),

this court noted that the analysis in James expressly does not concern

enumerated offenses and pertains only to a residual provision in 18 U.S.C.

§ 924(2)(B)(ii), which § 2L1.2 does not contain. Consequently, James is not

dispositive of this case. Moreover, because this court has repeatedly held that

an offense under § 30.02(a)(1) constitutes a crime of violence for purposes of

§ 2L1.2,the district court did not plainly err in applying the enhancement under

§ 2L1.2(b)(1)(A)(ii). See Gomez-Guerra, 485 F.3d at 304; United States v.

Garcia-Mendez, 420 F.3d 454, 456-57 (5th Cir. 2005); see also United States v.

Murillo-Lopez, 444 F.3d 337, 339, 344 (5th Cir. 2006).

In light of Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 (2000), Castillo-Medina

challenges the constitutionality of § 1326(b)’s treatment of prior felony and

aggravated felony convictions as sentencing factors rather than elements of the

offense that must be found by a jury. This court has held that this issue is “fully

foreclosed from further debate.” United States v. Pineda-Arrellano,

492 F.3d 624, 625 (5th Cir. 2007), petition for cert. filed (Aug. 28, 2007)

(No. 07-6202).

Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-6063

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

JOHNNY THOMAS,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Fox, Chief District

Judge. (CR-94-75-7-1-F)

Submitted: February 13, 1997 Decided: February 27, 1997

Before WIDENER and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Johnny Thomas, Appellant Pro Se. Harold Franklin Askins, Assistant

Attorney General, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant filed an untimely notice of appeal. We dismiss for

lack of jurisdiction. The time periods for filing notices of appeal

are governed by Fed. R. App. P. 4. These periods are "mandatory and

jurisdictional." Browder v. Director, Dep't of Corrections, 434

U.S. 257, 264 (1978) (quoting United States v. Robinson, 361 U.S.

220, 229 (1960)). Criminal defendants have ten days within which to

file in the district court notices of appeal from judgments or

final orders. Fed. R. App. P. 4(b).

The district court entered its judgment order on December 12,

1994; Appellant's notice of appeal was filed on Dec. 23, 1996.

Appellant's failure to note a timely appeal leaves this court

without jurisdiction to consider the merits of Appellant's appeal.

We therefore dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AT SEPTEMBER 30, 2000 (UNAUDITED) AND THE
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER
30, 2000 (UNAUDITED) AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000949244
<NAME> ALTERNATE MARKETING NETWORKS, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                           2,208
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    5,625
<ALLOWANCES>                                       100
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 7,907
<PP&E>                                             377
<DEPRECIATION>                                     269
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  10,284
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            2,274
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        10,524
<OTHER-SE>                                     (2,513)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    10,284
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                17,138
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   12,844
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   9
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  3,026
<INCOME-TAX>                                       785
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              2,242
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,242
<EPS-BASIC>                                      .52
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .52


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32



             CERTIFICATION REQUIRED BY 18 U.S.C. SS.1350, AS ADOPTED
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



      In connection with the annual report of Decorator Industries, Inc. ("the
      Company") on Form 10-K for the annual period ended January 1, 2005, as
      filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
      "Report"), we, William A. Bassett, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
      and Michael K. Solomon, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
      pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

          (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
               or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and


          (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
               material respects, the financial condition and results of
               operations of the Company.




Date: March 31, 2005             By: /s/  William A. Bassett
      --------------               ----------------------------------------
                                   William A. Bassett, Chief Executive Officer


Date: March 31, 2005             By: /s/  Michael K. Solomon
      --------------                 -------------------------------------
                                    Michael K. Solomon, Chief Financial Officer
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

Nos. 98-40689 & 98-40695 Conference Calendar

DAVID DAVIS ET AL., Plaintiffs, WILLIE A. MILTON, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus WAYNE SCOTT, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, INSTITUTIONAL DIVISION, ET AL., Defendants-Appellees. * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

WILLIE A. MILTON ET AL., Plaintiffs, WILLIE A. MILTON, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus WAYNE SCOTT, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, INSTITUTIONAL DIVISION, ET AL., Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeals from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC Nos. G-96-CV-269 & G-96-CV-360

- - - - - - - - - -No. 98-40689 & 98-40695 -2-

* This matter is being decided by a quorum. 28 U.S.C. § 46(d).

** Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. February 10, 1999 Before BARKSDALE and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges. *
PER CURIAM: ** Willie A. Milton, Texas state prisoner #561014, appeals from the district court’s dismissals of his civil rights complaints as frivolous and for failure to state a claim upon which relief could be granted. Milton argues that he was retaliated against for acting as a jailhouse lawyer for two fellow inmates. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. To the extent that Milton also raised a claim under the Americans with Disabilities Act, he has abandoned such claim on appeal. See Yohey v. Collins , 985 F.2d 222, 224-25 (5th Cir. 1993). The appeals are without arguable merit and thus frivolous. Because the appeals are frivolous, they are DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2. The dismissal of these appeals as frivolous and the dismissals by the district court total four “strikes” for purposes of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). See Adepegba v. Hammons , 103 F.3d 383, 387-88 (5th Cir. 1996). Milton is now barred from filing any civil action or appeal in forma pauperis unless he is under imminent danger of serious physical injury. § 1915(g). APPEALS DISMISSED.
# PIOB
#### Sherman A. KATZ and Paul Koenig, Appellants, v. WORLD AIRWAYS, INC., Appellee.

No. 72-665.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Oct. 2, 1972.

Appeal from Court of Record, Broward County; Thomas J. Reddick, Jr., Judge.

Appeal dismissed.
#### B. Allen TEMPLE, Plaintiff-Defendant in Reconvention-Appellee, v. L. L. GOEBEL, Defendant-Plaintiff in Reconvention-Appellant.

No. 12043.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Second Circuit.

March 6, 1973.

Drew, White, Drew & Drew by R. Harmon Drew, Jr., Minden, for plaintiff-appel-lee, B. Allen Temple.

Bodenheimer, Jones, Klotz & Simmons by G. M. Bodenheimer, Jr., Shreveport, for defendant in reconvention-appellee, B. Allen Temple.

Campbell, Campbell, Marvin & Johnson by John T. Campbell, Minden, for defendant-plaintiff in reconvention-appellant, L. L. Goebel.

Before BOLIN, HEARD and HALL, JJ.

BOLIN, Judge.

By this action B. Allen Temple seeks to recover for personal injuries and damage to his pickup truck allegedly caused by the negligence of L. L. Goebel in driving his Chevrolet car to the left directly in front of Temple at a street intersection in Min-den, Louisiana. Goebel answered denying negligence, alternatively pleading contributory negligence against Temple, and reconvened seeking to recover for his personal injuries as well as damage to his automobile. For reasons dictated into the record the trial judge concluded the accident was caused solely by the negligence of Goebel. From judgment in favor of Temple against Goebel for $341.26 for damage to his truck but rejecting all other demands, Goebel appeals. We affirm the ruling of the lower court.

The accident occurred where four streets converge, forming an irregular shaped intersection. The traffic is controlled by multiple overhead electric signal lights. Prior to the accident Temple had stopped his truck facing north, waiting for a traffic light to turn from red to green. Goebel was on the opposite side of the same light, second in line behind another car, facing south, likewise stopped and waiting for the light to turn from red to green. There were no protective arrows for left-turning motorists on this light and it turned from red to green at the same time for both north and southbound traffic. As the light turned to green Temple proceeded to drive his truck north in low *437gear. At approximately the same time Goebel and the car in front of him began moving south into the intersection. The lead car made a successful left turn and proceeded east and Goebel was negotiating a left turn when the Temple truck struck the right rear side of his car before he could clear the intersection.

While there is some conflict in the evidence, we find Goebel gave no signal indicating his intention to turn left. We further find Temple was proceeding straight through the intersection pursuant to a green light, at a reasonable rate of speed, and had entered the intersection at approximately the same time as the vehicle ahead of Goebel.

The lower court found that Goebel’s act of turning left in front of oncoming traffic in the manner in which he did was the sole cause of the accident and we agree. Since plaintiff has neither appealed nor answered the appeal and Goebel has not questioned the amount of the award, the judgment is affirmed at appellant’s cost.