alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Equal Employment Opportunity Commission

# CONTACT PERSON FOR FURTHER INFORMATION:

Bernadette B. Wilson, Executive Officer on (202) 663-4077.

Dated: August 15, 2018.

Bernadette B. Wilson,

Executive Officer, Executive Secretariat.

[FR Doc. 2018-17922 Filed 8-15-18; 4:15 pm]

 BILLING CODE 6570-01-P
----

----

|   | 1.           The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2.           The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company. |
|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date: November 23, 2015 | By:    | /s/ Dennis Alexander                                               |   |
|-------------------------|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                    | Name:  | Dennis Alexander                                                   |   |
|                    | Title: | Chief Executive Officer and Director (Principal Executive Officer) |   |

----
#### Caruso *v.*Members B. & L. Assn., Appellant.

Argued October 12,. 1934.

*213Before Trexler, P. J., Keller, Cunningham, Baldbige, Stadteeld, Parker and James, JJ.

*D. Arthur Magaziner,*and with him *Laurence Brunswick*and *Clinton O. Mayer,*for appellant.

*John F. E. Eiffel,*and with him *Leon J. Obermayer*of *Edmonds, Obermayer & Rebmann,*for appellee.

November 22, 1934:

Per Curiam,

The matter arose in a petition praying for a decree to satisfy a mortgage belonging to the defendant building and loan association. The státement of the question involved is “under the undisputed evidence in this case was defendant insolvent when plaintiff sought to apply his shares on account of his mortgage indebtedness ?

The answer to this is that there was sufficient evidence to support the finding of the court that the company was solvent. There were several appraisers who testified, according to their investigations, that the company was insolvent on December 16, 1932. There were other reports made by accountants presumably just as competent, which show that the association was earning money, mating profits and that profits were *214allocated to the various series. It was for the judge, sitting as chancellor, to determine what the real fact was. It was not a matter of law. It was a matter of accepting and rejecting contradictory evidence. It seems that the chancellor was fully justified in the conclusion reached. The fact that a building and loan association has not liquid assets sufficient to meet any imaginable demand does not prove insolvency. The evidence shows that the defendant is a going concern which in all probability will eventually pay all the indebtedness it carries. The question before the court for determination was upon considering the testimony and the documentary evidence, whether or not the defendant has shown that.it was insolvent on December 16, 1932. Solvency or insolvency is a question of fact. The defendant having alleged insol-' vency, it was its duty to prove it. B. & L. Assoc. v. Polak, 102 Pa. Superior Ct. 36, 156 A. 556; Savitz B. & L. Assoc. v. Lissman, 101 Pa. Superior Ct. 501. Of course, if the association was solvent the right to appropriate the shares to the payment of the loan followed. Crawford v. New Spartan B. & L. Assoc., 112 Pa. Superior Ct. 113 and cases therein cited: 170 A. 695.

The decree of the lower court is affirmed. Appellant ■to pay the costs.
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3143 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3143

     To authorize issuance of a certificate of documentation with 
       appropriate endorsement for the vessel GRIZZLY PROCESSOR.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 27, 1993

 Mr. Young of Alaska introduced the following bill; which was referred 
           to the Committee on Merchant Marine and Fisheries

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
     To authorize issuance of a certificate of documentation with 
       appropriate endorsement for the vessel GRIZZLY PROCESSOR.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled, That, notwithstanding 
section 27 of the Merchant Marine Act, 1920 (46 App. U.S.C. 883), and 
sections 12106, 12107, and 12108 of title 46, United States Code, as 
applicable on the date of this Act, the Secretary of Transportation may 
issue a certificate of documentation with appropriate endorsement for 
the vessel GRIZZLY PROCESSOR, Canadian official number 369183.

                                 <all>
```
```

[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 184 (Thursday, September 22, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Pages 65462-65463]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-22826]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

Twentieth RTCA SC-223 Aeronautical Mobile Airport Communication 
System Plenary Calling Notice

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), U.S. Department of 
Transportation (DOT).

ACTION: Twentieth RTCA SC-223 Aeronautical Mobile Airport Communication 
System Plenary Calling Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FAA is issuing this notice to advise the public of a 
meeting of Twentieth RTCA SC-223 Aeronautical Mobile Airport 
Communication System Plenary Calling Notice.

DATES: The meeting will be held November 08-09, 2016, 09:00 a.m.-05:00 
p.m. and November 10, 2016 09:00 a.m.-12:00 p.m.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at: RTCA Headquarters, 1150 18th 
Street NW., Suite 910, Washington, DC 20036.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Rebecca Morrison at rmorrison@rtca.org 
or (202) 330-0654, or The RTCA Secretariat, 1150 18th Street NW., Suite 
910, Washington, DC 20036, or by telephone at (202) 833-9339, fax at 
(202) 833-9434, or Web site at http://www.rtca.org.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant to section 10(a)(2) of the Federal 
Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463, 5 U.S.C., App.), notice is 
hereby given for a meeting of the Twentieth RTCA SC-223 Aeronautical 
Mobile Airport Communication System Plenary Calling Notice. The agenda 
will include the following:

November 8 & 9, 9:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m., November 10, 9:00 a.m. to 12:00 
p.m.

1. Welcome, Introductions, Administrative Remarks
2. Review of Previous Meeting Notes and Action Items
3. Review of Current State of Industry Standards
    a. ICAO WG-I
    b. AEEC IPS Sub Committee
4. Current State of Industry Activities
    a. SESAR Programs
    b. ESA IRIS Precursor
    c. Any Other Activities
5. IPS Technical Discussions
    a. Review of Profiling Report on IPv6 Functions and Corresponding 
RFCs
    b. Review of IPS RFC Profiles
    c. Prioritization of Additional IETF RFCs for Profiling
6. Any Other Topics of Interest
7. Plans for Next Meetings
8. Review of Action Items and Meeting Summary

[[Page 65463]]

9. Adjourn

    Attendance is open to the interested public but limited to space 
availability. With the approval of the chairman, members of the public 
may present oral statements at the meeting. Persons wishing to present 
statements or obtain information should contact the person listed in 
the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section. Members of the public may 
present a written statement to the committee at any time.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on September 19, 2016.
Mohannad Dawoud,
Management & Program Analyst, Partnership Contracts Branch, ANG-A17 
NextGen, Procurement Services Division, Federal Aviation 
Administration.
[FR Doc. 2016-22826 Filed 9-21-16; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
```
263 La. 377

#### STATE of Louisiana v. Billy Wayne SINCLAIR.

No. 50645.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Oct. 26, 1972.

William J. Guste, Jr., Atty. Gen., Harry H. Howard, Asst. Atty. Gen., Lee A. Hart-ley, Sp. Counsel, Sargent Pitcher, Jr., Dist. Atty., for plaintiff-appellee.

Elie, ¿trickier & Dennis, Richard B. Sobol, New Orleans, for defendant-appellant.

PER CURIAM.

Defendant, Billy Wayne Sinclair, was convicted of murder, and the death sentence imposed was affirmed by this Court. 258 La. 84, 245 So.2d 365 (1971).

Citing Stewart v. Massachusetts, 408 U. S. 845, 92 S.Ct. 2845, 33 L.Ed.2d 744 (1972), following Furman v. Georgia, 408 U.S. 238, 92 S.Ct. 2726, 33 L.Ed.2d 346 (1972), the United States Supreme Court vacated the judgment herein insofar as it left undisturbed the death penalty imposed and remanded this case to this Court for further proceedings. 408 U.S. 939, 92 S.Ct. 2871, 33 L.Ed.2d 760 (1972).

We construe the Mandate of the United States Supreme Court to require the imposition of a sentence other than death. Cf., State v. Shaffer, 260 La. 605, 257 So.2d 121 (1971) and State v. Duplessis, 260 La. 644, 257 So.2d 135 (1971).

Accordingly, in compliance with the Mandate of the United States Supreme Court, the death sentence imposed upon defendant is annulled and set aside, and the case is remanded to the 19th Judicial District Court with instructions to the trial judge to sentence the defendant to life imprisonment.

Case remanded.
# C_2012266EN.01000101.xml

| 4.9.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 266/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.9.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 266/1

---

Interest rate applied by the European Central Bank to its main refinancing operations (1):

1

0,75 % on 1 September 2012

Euro exchange rates (2)

2

3 September 2012

2012/C 266/01

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,2568 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 98,43 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4512 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,79120 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 8,4161 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,2008 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 7,3015 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 24,894 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 284,90 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,6963 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,1933 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,4921 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,2878 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,2278 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,2400 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 9,7484 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,5753 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,5682 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 422,42 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 10,5856 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,9686 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,4733 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 12 007,25 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 3,9118 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 52,669 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 40,7375 |
| THB | Thai baht | 39,250 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 2,5503 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 16,6224 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 69,7960 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,2568

JPY

Japanese yen

98,43

DKK

Danish krone

7,4512

GBP

Pound sterling

0,79120

SEK

Swedish krona

8,4161

CHF

Swiss franc

1,2008

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

7,3015

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

24,894

HUF

Hungarian forint

284,90

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,6963

PLN

Polish zloty

4,1933

RON

Romanian leu

4,4921

TRY

Turkish lira

2,2878

AUD

Australian dollar

1,2278

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,2400

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

9,7484

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,5753

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,5682

KRW

South Korean won

1 422,42

ZAR

South African rand

10,5856

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,9686

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,4733

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

12 007,25

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

3,9118

PHP

Philippine peso

52,669

RUB

Russian rouble

40,7375

THB

Thai baht

39,250

BRL

Brazilian real

2,5503

MXN

Mexican peso

16,6224

INR

Indian rupee

69,7960

---

(1)  Rate applied to the most recent operation carried out before the indicated day. In the case of a variable rate tender, the interest rate is the marginal rate.

1

(2)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

2

Source:

---
EXHIBIT 11

                    THE DELTONA CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

                COMPUTATION OF NET INCOME (LOSS) PER COMMON SHARE
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                            Years Ended
                                            ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                            December 31,     December 31,  December 31,   December 31,    December 31,
                                                1997            1996           1995            1994          1993
                                            ------------    ------------   -----------    ------------   -------------
<S>                                         <C>              <C>           <C>            <C>            <C>
Computation of primary income (loss)
  per common share<F1>:

 Loss before extraordinary item.....         $  (1,326)      $  (1,227)    $   (2,905)    $   (3,906)    $(8,772)
                                             =========       =========     ==========     ==========     =======
 Net income (loss)..................         $  (1,326)      $    (896)    $   (2,203)    $   (3,906)    $(8,772)
                                             =========       =========     ==========     ==========     =======
 Net income (loss) applicable
   to common stock..................         $  (1,326)      $    (896)    $   (2,203)    $   (3,906)    $(8,772)
                                             =========       =========     ==========     ==========     =======
 Total weighted average common shares
   outstanding......................         $   6,754       $   6,730     $    6,669     $    6,669     $ 6,057
                                             =========       =========     ==========     ==========     =======
 Per Common Share Data:
  Loss before extraordinary items            $    (.20)     $    (.18)    $     (.43)    $     (.59)    $ (1.45)
                                             =========       =========     ==========     ==========     =======

 Net income (loss)..................         $    (.20)      $    (.13)    $     (.33)    $     (.59)    $ (1.45)
                                             =========       =========     ==========     ==========     =======

<FN>
------------------------

     <F1>Basic   earnings  per  common   share   assuming   full   dilution  was
         approximately the same for all periods.

</FN>
</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 31.2




CERTIFICATION






I, David Meynarez, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer, certify that:






1.
I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009 of QSGI INC. (the “Registrant”);






2.
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;






3.
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;






4.
The Registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Registrant and have:






(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;






(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and






(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the Registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the Registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the Registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and






5.
The Registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the Registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):






(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and






(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Registrant's internal control over financial reporting.




Date: November 4, 2011

/s/ David MeynarezDavid Meynarez

Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                                          5
<LEGEND>
     THIS SCHEDULE  CONTAINS SUMMARY  FINANCIAL  INFORMATION  EXTRACTED FROM THE
     FY96  CONSOLIDATED  BALANCE SHEET AND CONSOLIDATED  STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS
     AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                                 1,000
       
<S>                                                  <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                      12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                  SEP-28-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                       SEP-28-1996
<CASH>                                                     178,997
<SECURITIES>                                                25,624
<RECEIVABLES>                                              272,295
<ALLOWANCES>                                                14,480
<INVENTORY>                                                129,783
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                           616,812
<PP&E>                                                     638,972
<DEPRECIATION>                                             471,300
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                             860,443
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                      366,184
<BONDS>                                                    149,971
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                            0
<PREFERRED>                                                      0
<COMMON>                                                   460,312
<OTHER-SE>                                                (131,248)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                               860,443
<SALES>                                                    924,140
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                         1,322,250
<CGS>                                                      618,351
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                              877,692
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                           407,281
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                          13,072
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                             31,645
<INCOME-TAX>                                                 3,500
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                         28,145
<DISCONTINUED>                                                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                  0
<CHANGES>                                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                                                28,145
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                 0.68
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                 0.68

        

</TABLE>