FI LED U. S . COURT OF AP PE ALS E L E V E N T H C IR C U IT Se pt e m be r 11, 2008 T HOM AS K. KAHN CL E RK [ DO NO T P UB L I S H] I N THE UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS F O R T H E E L E V E N T H C IR C U IT

________________________ N o. 05- 16431 N on -A rgum entC al endar

________________________ D . C. D o c k e tN o . 9 5 - 0 0 4 3 0 - CR- SH U N I T E D S T A T E S O F A M E R I C A , P la in tif f - A p p e lle e , v ersu s R O B E R T B U T L E R , D e f e n d a n t- A p p e lla n t.

________________________ A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt f orthe S outhe rn D i s tr i c tof F l or i da

_________________________ ( S e p t e m b e r 11, 2008) B efo re B L A C K , M A R C U S an d P R Y O R , C i rcu i tJu d g es. P E R C U R I A M: R ob ertB ut l er , a f

eder al pri soner procee di ng pro se, appeal s f rom the distri ct c o u r t ’ s d e n ia l o f

h is 1 8 U .S .C . § 3 5 8 2 ( c ) m o tio n to m o d if y h is 3 6 0 - m o n th s e nt e nc e , ba s e d on gui de l i ne A m e ndm e nt506, w hi c h a ddr e s s e d the de f i n i t i on of2

“ O ff ense S t atut ory M ax im u m ” i n U . S . S . G . § 4 B 1. 1 cm t . n. 2. O n app ea l , B ut l er a r gue s tha tthe di s tr i c tc ourte rr e d by de ny i ng hi s § 3582 (c) m o t i on w i thout r e c a l c ul a t i ng hi s gui de l i ne r a nge unde rth e am endm e nt , a nd tha tthe r e c or d di d not s u p p o rtth e d e n i a l . A f

t e rc a r e f u l r e v i e w , w e a f

f i rm. W e r e v ie w ad is tr ic t c o u rt ’ s o r d e rd e n y in g as e n te n c e r e d u c tio n , p u r s u a n t to § 3582( c ) ( 2) , f

orabus e of

di s c r e t i on. U ni t ed S t a t e s v. M or e no, 421 F . 3d 1217, 1 2 1 9 ( 1 1 th C ir . 2 0 0 5 ) . U n d e rth e G u id e lin e s , th e o f f e n s e le v e l o f

ac a r e e r o f

f e n d e ris g e n e r a lly de t e rm i ne d by ref

e r e nc e t o hi s of

f e ns e s t a tut ory m a xi m um . S e e U . S . S . G . § 4B 1. 1. A m en d m en t5 0 6 , effecti v e N o v em b er 1 , 1 9 9 4 , ch an g ed th e d efi n i t i o n o f “ o ffen se st atut ory m axi m um ” s o thati ti ncl ud ed o n ly the basi c s t atut ory m axi m um , ra ther tha n am a xi m um tha tha d b een i n cre a s e d by vi r tue of the de f e nda nt ’ s pr i or co n v i ct i o n s: ‘O f fen se S t atu t o ry M ax i m u m , ’ fo r th e p u rp o ses o f [§ 4 B 1 . 1 ] ref e r s to the m a xi m um t e rm of i m pr i s onm e ntauthor i z e d f orthe of

f e ns e of conv i ct i on thati s acr i m e of vi ol ence o r control l ed subst ance offe nse, noti nc l udi ng a ny i nc r e a s e i n tha tm a xi m um t e rm unde ras e nt e nc i ng e n h a nc e m e ntpr ovi s i on tha tappl i e s be c aus e of the de f e nda nt ’ s pr i or cr i m i nal re cord (s uch sent enci ng enhancem entprov i si on s are cont ai ned, for e xam pl e, i n 2 1 U . S . C . § 8 4 1 (b )( 1)(A ), (b)( 1)(B ), ( b )(1 ) ( C ) , a nd ( b) ( 1) ( D ) ) . F ore xa m pl e , w he r e the s t a tut ory m a xi m um t erm of i m pri sonm entun der 21 U . S . C . § 8 41 (b)( 1)(C ) i s i ncre as ed f r om tw e nty y e a r s t o thi r ty y ears be c aus e the de f e nda ntha s one or m ore qual i fy i ng pri or drug conv i ct i on s, the ‘ O ffense S t atut ory3

M ax i m u m ’ fo rthe purpos e s of thi s gui de l i ne i s tw e nty y e a r s a nd not th i rty years. U .S .S .G . A p p . C , A m e n d . 5 0 6 ( e m p h a s is a d d e d ) . A p p ly in g th is a m e n d m e n t, B ut l e rc ont e nds tha tw he n he w a s s e nt e nc e d i n J ul y 1997, the s en t en ci ng e nha nc e m e nt s s houl d notha ve be e n i n cl u d ed i n de t e rm i ni ng hi s of f e ns e l e ve l f

or pu rposes of U . S . S . G . § 4 B 1. 1. T hu s, h e sa ys, hi s off ense l evel shou l d h ave been 32, r a the rtha n 37. Y e t i n M a y 1 9 9 7 , th e Su p r e me Co u r th e l d th a tA me n d me n t5 0 6 v i o l a t e d the p l ai n l an g u ag e o f 2 8 U . S . C . § 9 4 4 (h ) b ec a u se th atsect i o n req u i red th at“ o ffen se st atut ory m axi m um ” m usti ncl ud e s ent enci ng enhancem entprov i si on s. U ni t ed S t a t e s v. L a B ont e , 520 U . S . 751, 757- 62 ( 1997) . I n r e s p o n se t o L a B ont e , the C om m i ss i on i ss ued A m endm ent56 7, w hi ch am ended § 4B 1. 1 cm t. n .2 t o speci fy th at“ o ffen se st atu t o ry m ax i m u m ” i n cl u d es sen t en ci n g en h an ce m e n tp ro v i si o n s. S e e U .S .S .G . A p p . C , A m e n d . 5 6 7 . W e f in d n o m e r it to B u tle r ’s a r g u m e n t t h a t th e d is tr ic t c o u r t ab u s e d its di sc re t i on in d en yin g h i s § 35 82 (c ) m ot i on . U nd erS ec t i on 35 82 (c )( 2), a di stri ct c ourtm a y m odi f

y ade f e nda nt ’ s pr e vi o u sl y i m pos e d s e nt e nc e , a f t e rc ons i de r i ng the 18 U . S . C . § 3553( a ) f a c t or s , w he n the t erm of i m pr i s onm e ntw a s ba s e d on a gu i de l i ne r a ng e tha t w a s s ub s e qu e nt l y l ow e r e d by the Se nt e nc i ng Comm i s s i on , as l ong a s the r e duc t i on i s c on si st en tw i th the C om m i s s i on pol i c y s t a t e m e nt s . 184

U . S . C . § 3 5 8 2 ( c ) ( 2 ) . H e r e , h o w e v e r , A me n d me n t5 0 6 - - w h i c h Bu t l e rn o w c l a i ms w as re troac t i vel y app l i cabl e t o h i m -- w as i n p l ac e i n Jul y 199 7, w hen h e w as s e n te n c e d . A s ar e s u l t, th a t a m e n d m e n t c o u ld n o t h a v e b e e n r e tr o a c tiv e ly appl i cabl e t o h im , a n d h e there fore i s notent i t l ed t o rel i ef un der S ec t i on 35 82 (c ). M or e ove r , a tthe t i m e he w a s s e nt e nc e d, the S upr e m e C our tha d a l r e a dy in v alid ated A m en d m en t 5 0 6 , an d th e d istrict c o u rt co rr ec tl y c alcu lated B u tl er ’s se nt ence base d o n the gu i del i nes thatw er e val i d and appl i cable to hi m atthatt i m e. A cc o rd in g ly, th e d istrict co u rt d id n o t ab u se it s d iscr etio n in d e n y in g B u tl er ’s § 3 5 8 2 ( c ) mo t i o n , a n d w e a f f i rm. AF F I RME D.