12-2634-cv Garcia v. Jane & John Does

**UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS** 1

2

**FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT** 3

4

5 **At a stated term of the United States Court of Appeals** 6 **for the Second Circuit, held at the Thurgood Marshall United** 7 **States Courthouse, 40 Foley Square, in the City of New York, on** 8 **the 17 th**  **day of December, two thousand fourteen,** 9

10

**Present:** 11 **ROBERT A. KATZMANN,** 12 **Chief Judge,** 13 **DENNIS JACOBS,** 14 **GUIDO CALABRESI,*** 15 **JOSÉ A CABRANES,** 16 **ROSEMARY S. POOLER,** 17 **REENA RAGGI,** 18 **RICHARD C. WESLEY,** 19

**PETER W. HALL** 20 **DEBRA ANN LIVINGSTON,** 21 **GERARD E. LYNCH,** 22 **DENNY CHIN,** 23 **RAYMOND J. LOHIER, JR.,** 24 **SUSAN L. CARNEY,** 25 **CHRISTOPHER F. DRONEY,** 26 **Circuit Judges.** 27

28

--------------------------------------x 29 **Karina Garcia, as Class Representative** 30 **on behalf of herself and others similarly** 31 **situated,Yari Osorio, as Class Representative** 32 **on behalf of herself and others similarly** 33 **situated, Benjamin Becker, as Class** 34 **Representative on behalf of himself and** 35 **others similarly situated, Cassandra Regan, as** 36 **Class Representative on behalf of herself and** 37 **others similarly situated, Yareidis Perez,** 38 **as Class Representative on behalf of herself** 39 **and others similarly situated, Tyler Sova,** 40 **as Class Representative on behalf of himself** 41 **and others similarly situated, Stephanie Jean** 42 **Umoh, as Class Representative on behalf of** 43 **herself and others similarly situated, Michael** 44 **Crickmore, as Class Representative on behalf** 45**of himself and others similarly situated,** 46 **Brooke Feinstein,as Class Representative on** 47 **behalf of herself and others similarly situated,** 48

49 **Plaintiffs - Appellees,** 50

51 **Marcel Cartier, as Class Representative** 52 **on behalf of himself and others similarly situated,** 53

54 **Plaintiff,** 55

56
**v. 12-2634** 57

58 **Jane and John Does 1-40, Individually and in** 59 **their official capacities,** 60

61 **Defendants - Appellants,** 62 **Raymond W. Kelly, Individually and in his** 63 **official capacity, City of New York, Michael R.** 64 **Bloomberg, in his official capacity and** 65 **Individually,** 66

67 **Defendants.** 68

--------------------------------------x 69

70 For Plaintiffs- Mara Verheyden-Hillard (Andrea Hope 71 Appellees: Costello and Carl Messineo, on the 72 brief), Partnership for Civil Justice 73 Fund, Washington, DC 74 For Defendants- Ronald E. Sternberg, Assistant 75 Appellants: Corporation Counsel (Leonard Koerner 76 and Arthur G. Larkin, Assistant 77 Corporation Counsel, on the brief), for 78 Zachary W. Carter, Corporation Counsel 79 of the City of New York, New York, NY 80

81
**ORDER** 82

83 Following disposition of this appeal on August 21, 2014, an 84 active judge of the Court requested a poll on whether to rehear 85 the case in banc . A poll having been conducted and a majority of 86 the active judges of the Court having voted in favor of 87 rehearing this appeal in banc

, 88

89 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this appeal be heard in banc

. See 90 Fed. R. App. P. 35(a). The in banc panel will consist of the 91 active judges of the Court and (subject to his election) the 92senior circuit judge who served on the three-judge panel. See 28 93 U.S.C. § 46(c). 94

95 The panel having recommended withdrawal of its opinions in 96 this case, such withdrawal shall be noted on the docket by the 97 Clerk of Court. 98

99 A briefing schedule will follow in due course. 100

101

102

FOR THE COURT: 103 Catherine O’Hagan Wolfe 104 Clerk of Court 105

106

107

108

109 * Senior Circuit Judge Guido Calabresi was a member of the 110 initial three-judge panel that heard this appeal and is 111 therefore eligible to participate in in banc rehearing. 112 See 28 U.S.C. § 46 (c)(1). 113