alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2013345EN.01000101.xml

| 26.11.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 345/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.11.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 345/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.7022 — Immochan/CNP Assurances/Galerie Commerciale de Kirchberg)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2013/C 345/01

On 14 November 2013, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in French and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32013M7022. EUR-Lex is the online access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32013M7022. EUR-Lex is the online access to the European law.

---
# C_2016265DE.01000501.xml

| 21.7.2016 | DE | Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union | C 265/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.7.2016

DE

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union

C 265/5

---

Berichtigung der Rahmenregelung der Europäischen Union für staatliche Beihilfen im Agrar- und Forstsektor und in ländlichen Gebieten 2014-2020

(
  Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union C 204 vom 1. Juli 2014
  )

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union C 204 vom 1. Juli 2014

(2016/C 265/06)

Seite 41, Randnummer 217:

Anstatt:

Anstatt

„Die folgenden Arten von landwirtschaftlichen Nutztieren kommen für eine Förderung in Betracht: Schafe, Ziegen, Equiden, Schweine und Vögel.“

muss es heißen:

muss es heißen

„Die folgenden Arten von landwirtschaftlichen Nutztieren kommen für eine Förderung in Betracht: Rinder, Schafe, Ziegen, Equiden, Schweine und Vögel.“

Seite 51, Randnummer 315, einleitender Satz:

Anstatt:

Anstatt

„Die Beihilfe sollte zur Förderung von Formen der Zusammenarbeit gewährt werden, die mindestens zwei Einrichtungen und insbesondere Folgendes betreffen:“

muss es heißen:

muss es heißen

„Die Beihilfe sollte zur Förderung von Formen der Zusammenarbeit gewährt werden, die mindestens zwei Einrichtungen, ungeachtet der Tatsache, ob diese im Agrarsektor tätig sind, solange ausschließlich der Agrarsektor von der Zusammenarbeit profitiert, und insbesondere Folgendes betreffen:“.

Seite 93, Randnummer 701, einleitender Satzteil:

Anstatt:

Anstatt

„Die Zusammenarbeit, an der mindestens zwei Einrichtungen beteiligt sein müssen, von denen mindestens eine ein nicht im Agrarsektor tätiges Unternehmen ist, betrifft insbesondere“

muss es heißen:

muss es heißen

„Die Zusammenarbeit, an der mindestens zwei Einrichtungen beteiligt sein müssen, betrifft insbesondere“.

---
Exhibit
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report
of Protect Pharmaceutical Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the
period ended June 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, William D. Abajian, Chief
Executive Officer and Principal Accounting Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1) 
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) 
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.





/s/
      William
      D. AbajianWilliam
      D. AbajianChief
      Executive OfficerActing
      Principal Accounting OfficerAugust
      23, 2010





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.  The
foregoing certifications are accompanying the Company's Form 10-Q solely
pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and
(b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code) and is not
being filed as part of the Form 10-Q or as a separate disclosure
document.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 18-1681

AZADEH CHEGINI,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

HARBORVIEW MORTGAGE LOAN TRUST 2006-12; BANK OF AMERICA, 

N.A., Individually and as successor to: Countrywide Financial Corporation, 

Countrywide Home Loans, Countrywide Home Loans Servicing, L.P. 

(“Countrywide-Bana”); SELECT PORTFOLIO SERVICING, INC.; 

HARBORVIEW MORTGAGE LOAN TRUST MORTGAGE PASS-THROUGH 

CERTIFICATES, SERIES 2006-12; COUNTRYWIDE HOME LOANS, 

INCORPORATED; DOES 1 - 100,

Defendants – Appellees,

and

MORTGAGE GUARANTY INSURANCE CORPORATION, (“MGIC”),

Defendant. 

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at 

Alexandria. T. S. Ellis, III, Senior District Judge. (1:17-cv-00927-TSE-TCB)

Submitted: February 25, 2019 Decided: March 5, 2019

Before NIEMEYER, WYNN, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.
2

Dismissed in part and affirmed in part by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Azadeh Chegini, Appellant Pro Se. William Dean Ledoux, Jr., ECKERT SEAMANS 

CHERIN & MELLOTT, LLC, Richmond, Virginia; Nathaniel Patrick Lee, 

MCGUIREWOODS, LLP, Tysons Corner, Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
3

PER CURIAM:

Azadeh Chegini seeks to appeal the district court’s orders dismissing her civil 

action arising out of her default on her home mortgage. Before addressing the merits of 

Chegini’s appeal, we first must be assured that we have jurisdiction. Porter v. Zook, 803 

F.3d 694, 696 (4th Cir. 2015). We find that we lack jurisdiction to review the district 

court’s November 2017 dismissal order because Chegini designated only the district 

court’s May 2018 dismissal order in her notice of appeal, in contravention of Fed. R. Civ. 

P. 3(c)(1)(B), causing one Defendant to receive no notice of her appeal. See Jackson v. 

Lightsey, 775 F.3d 170, 176-77 (4th Cir. 2014). Accordingly, we dismiss Chegini’s 

appeal as to the November 2017 dismissal order.

However, because the remaining Defendants received notice of Chegini’s appeal 

and have had an opportunity to brief all of the issues in this case, Chegini’s failure to 

designate the March 2018 dismissal order in her notice of appeal did not prejudice them. 

Thus we may review this order in addition to the May 2018 dismissal order. See id. 

Having reviewed the record, we find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the 

reasons stated by the district court. Chegini v. Harborview Mortg. Loan Tr., No. 1:17-cv00927-TSE-TCB (E.D. Va. Mar. 6, 2018 & May 31, 2018). We dispense with oral 

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the 

materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED IN PART; 

AFFIRMED IN PART
# C_2013376EN.01000202.xml

| 21.12.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 376/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.12.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 376/2

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.7087 — Vitol/Carlyle/Varo)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2013/C 376/04

On 17 December 2013, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32013M7087. EUR-Lex is the online access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32013M7087. EUR-Lex is the online access to the European law.

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-27-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-27-1997
<CASH>                                         532,896
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                2,265,614
<ALLOWANCES>                                   234,973
<INVENTORY>                                  4,867,708
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             7,674,326
<PP&E>                                       5,032,823
<DEPRECIATION>                               3,062,703
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              10,139,922
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        4,425,393
<BONDS>                                      1,815,693
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        13,205
<OTHER-SE>                                   3,885,631
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                10,139,922
<SALES>                                     12,090,678
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            12,090,678
<CGS>                                        8,243,556
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                8,243,556
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                29,824
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                89,691
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             563,617
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (2,030,422)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   737,909
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (2,768,331)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (2,768,331)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (2.11)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (2.11)
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>
<PAGE> 69

                                                                    Exhibit 23








                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS




We  consent to the  incorporation by  reference in  the Registration Statement
(Form  S-3  Number  33-47865) of  American General  Finance,  Inc. and  in the
related Prospectus of our report dated February 12, 1996, with respect to  the
consolidated financial  statements and schedule  of American General  Finance,
Inc. and subsidiaries included  in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year
ended December 31, 1995.


                                                  ERNST & YOUNG LLP


Indianapolis, Indiana
March 20, 1996
<PAGE>
## COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02

- 13

- 00066

- CV

Aida Haji, Individually and as Representative of the Estate of

Behnam William Arabu, Deceased,

and as Next Friend of Alexander

Behnam William, a Minor

v.

Valentine Enterprises , Inc.; Valentine
Delivery Services, LLC; and Darrell

Valentine §

§

§

§ From the 48th District Court

o f Tarrant County (048

- 264074

- 13 )

March 27, 2014

Opinion by Ju stice Gabriel



### JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that

there was no error in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment of

the trial court is affirmed.

It is further ordered that appellant Ai da Haji, Individually and as

Representative of the Estate of Behnam William Arabu, Deceased, and as Next

Friend of Alexander Behnam William, a Minor shall pay all costs of this appeal,

for which let execution issue.SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

/s/ Lee Gabriel

By

____ _____________________________ Justice Lee Gabriel
ex10a.htm
















Exhibit (10)(a)

















Consent of Ernst & Young LLP, Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm












We consent to the reference to our firm under the caption “Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm” in Post-Effective Amendment No. 67 to the 1933 Act Registration Statement (Form N-4 No. 333-36304) and Amendment No. 527 to the 1940 Act Registration Statement (Form N-4 No. 811-08517), and to the use therein of our reports dated (a) March 31, 2016, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of The Lincoln National Life Insurance Company and (b) April 12, 2016, with respect to the financial statements of Lincoln Life Variable Annuity Account N for the interests in a separate account under individual flexible payment deferred variable annuity contracts.







/s/ Ernst & Young LLP




 












Philadelphia, Pennsylvania


November 16, 2016
#### LITTLE BEAVER THEATER, INC., a Florida corporation, et al., Appellants, v. STATE of Florida ex rel. Richard E. GERSTEIN, as State Attorney of the Eleventh Judicial Circuit of the State of Florida, Appellee.

No. 71-142.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Feb. 10, 1971.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed.
#### Harry L. CAMPBELL, Appellant, v. Lloyd MACK; Florida Airmotive, Inc., a Florida corporation; and Fairfax Broadcasting Company, Inc., a Florida corporation, Appellees.

No. 69-143.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Fourth District.

Oct. 6, 1969.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
No. 00-7290.

#### Dunn *v.*Missouri.

Ct. App. Mo., Eastern Dist. Certiorari denied.
103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 3197

AN ACT

To redesignate the postal facility located at 2100

the ‘‘Gus Yatron Postal Facility’’.North 13th Street in Reading, Pennsylvania, as
103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 3197

AN ACT

To redesignate the postal facility located at 2100 North

13th Street in Reading, Pennsylvania, as the ‘‘Gus Yatron Postal Facility’’.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. REDESIGNATION.

4 The postal facility located at 2100 North 13th Street

5 in Reading, Pennsylvania, and known as the Reading Gen6 eral Mail Facility, shall be known and designated as the

7 ‘‘Gus Yatron Postal Facility’’.
2

•HR 3197 EH

1 SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

2 Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document,

3 paper, or other record of the United States to the postal

4 facility referred to in section 1 shall be deemed to be a

5 reference to the Gus Yatron Postal Facility.

Passed the House of Representatives November 8,

1993.

Attest:

Clerk.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT

TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Sara Lee Corporation (the Company) for the fiscal year ended June 28, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the Report), I, L.M. (Theo) de Kool, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial and Administrative Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                                       
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------
|Dated: August 27, 2008                                                 
|                                                                       
|/s/ L.M. (Theo) de Kool,                                               
|Executive Vice President and Chief Financial and Administrative Officer
# United States Court **of Appeals**  **f or the Fifth Circuit** 

No. 20

- 10614 Summary Calendar

**United States of America,**

Plaintiff

— Appellee **,**

versus

**Raymond Mandell Howard,**

Defendant

— Appellant

**.**

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 4:12

- CR

- 159

- 2

Before **Higginbotham, Jones,** and **Willett ,**  Circuit Judges

**. Per Curiam**  **:** *

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Raymond
Mandell Howard has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in
accordance with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States
v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Howard has not filed a response. We

* Pursuant to **5th Cir cuit**  **R ule**  47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in **5th Cir cuit**  **R ule**  47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED July 23, 2021
Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 20-10614 Document: 00515949551 Page: 1 Date Filed: 07/23/2021No. 20

- 10614

2 have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appella te review. Accordingly, counsel’s
motion for leave to withdraw is **GRANTED** , counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the **APPEAL IS DISMISSED**

. See
**5th Cir. R.** 42.2

. Case: 20-10614 Document: 00515949551 Page: 2 Date Filed: 07/23/2021
<PAGE>

                       SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

                             WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549


             -------------------------------------------------------


                                    FORM 8-K

                                 CURRENT REPORT


                         PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
                     OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934


                Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported):
                                  August 15, 2000


                          HONDA AUTO LEASE TRUST 1999-A
               (Exact name of registrant specified in its charter)


DELAWARE                   333-72303                      33-0846301
(State or other            (Commission                    (IRS Employer
jurisdiction of            File Number)                   Identification No.)
incorporation of
organization)


HONDA TITLING C L.P.
HONDA TITLING D L.P.
700 VAN NESS AVENUE
TORRANCE, CA                                              90501
-------------------------------------------------         -------------
(Address of principal executive offices)                  (Zip Code)


Registrant's telephone number, including area code: (310) 781-6146
                                                              6148


<PAGE>

Item 5.     Other Events


     On August 15, 2000, the Principal and Interest collected during the
preceding calendar month, net of certain adjustments as provided for in the
1999-A Securitization Trust Agreement dated as of July 1, 1999 (the
"Agreement"), between Honda Titling C L.P. and Honda Titling D L.P., as
Transferors, and U.S. Bank National Association, as Owner Trustee, Wilmington
Trust Company, as Delaware Owner Trustee, and Bank of New York, as Indenture
Trustee, (together the "Trustees") were distributed to holders of Notes
("Noteholders") and certificates ("Certificateholders") representing special
units of beneficial interest ("SUBI'S") in the Honda Auto Lease Trust 1999-A
Auto Lease Asset-Backed Notes and Certificates. In accordance with the
Agreement, the Servicer's Certificate, as defined in the Agreement, was
furnished to the Indenture Trustees for distribution to the Noteholders and
Certificateholders, and as such, was distributed by the Indenture Trustees to
the Noteholders and Certificateholders. A copy of the Servicer's Certificate
is being filed as Exhibit 20 to this Current Report on Form 8-k.

Item 7 (c). Exhibits  20



SIGNATURES



       Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned hereunto duly authorized.



Honda Auto Lease Trust 1999-A
By:   American Honda Finance Corporation, as Servicer

By:
/s/ John I. Weisickle
John I. Weisickle, Vice President, Finance
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 02-6063

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus RAYED FAWZI ABED, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Samuel G. Wilson, Chief District Judge. (CR-97-24-R, CA-01-383-7) Submitted: June 20, 2002 Decided: June 26, 2002 Before MICHAEL and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Marcia Gail Shein, LAW OFFICE OF MARCIA G. SHEIN, P.C., Decatur, Georgia, for Appellant. Thomas Jack Bondurant, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Rayed Fawzi Abed seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 2001). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Abed , Nos. CR-97-24-R; CA-01-383- 7 (W.D. Va. Oct. 22, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED